Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2012/07/18 - Agenda Packet
city of ANC;HU ~UC:AMUNC;A 10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477.2700 AGENDAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 1St and 3ro Wednesdays 4 7:00 P.M. JULY 18, 2012 ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room ................. 5:00 P.M. Call to Order Public Communications Conduct of Closed Session City Manager Announcements REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers ........................... 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS L. Dennis Michael Sam Spagnolo William Alexander Chuck Buquet Diane Williams CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK John R. Gillison James L. Markman Janice C. Reynolds l ~ ;~~ INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ~~ ~,~ , ( i ~. ,~~auN~~n TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD. AUTHORITY BOARD ANO CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board, Authority Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. or City Council should be given to the City During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any remaining "Public Communications" which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" item or on an "Administrative Hearing Item(s)," your name will be called when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS -Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's Public Library(-ies) and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST -Fire Board, Authority Board and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "vn- demand"from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the Citys website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhal!/council/vldeos.asp for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Fire Board, Authority Board and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire District Board and the Public Financing Authority Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.citvofrc.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~~~ ~'~ I "I ~ ~ , (ticnn~oNCn JULY 18, 2012 A. 5:00 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER -TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM A1. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Buquet and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM S C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION -TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM D1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(6) -ONE POTENTIAL CASE -SUCCESSOR AGENCY D2. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE AT DAY CREEK BOULEVARD; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: LINDA D. DANIELS, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND LEWIS OPERATING GROUP- SUCCESSOR AGENCY E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ~~t r`i "~ a ~ (~1 il:AMONGA JULY 18, 2012 2 CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Buquet and Williams ~~~ H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS ~~ H1. Recognition of the City of Rancho Cucamonga being designated as a Plug-In Electric Vehicle City Champion by Southern California Edison. H2. Fire District shares water safety tips for backyard swimming pools. H3. Recognition of Los Osos High School Girls Soccer Team Winners. H4. Presentations by Deputy George Dorta on crime prevention. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ~ PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 3 . «' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < <~~,~«~~~~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 18, 2012 CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J1. Approval of Minutes: June 20, 2012 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated June 13, 2012 through July 10, 2012 for the total amount ~ of $254,966.83. J3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2012. 10 J4. Approval of plans specifications and estimates and to authorize the advertising of the 14 "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Hellman Fire Station 177 Landscaping, to be funded from Account No. 3289501-5650/1597289-6314. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-042 17 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HELLMAN FIRE STATION 177 LANDSCAPING" IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS J5. Approval to set Annual Special Tax Levy for Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 21 88-1 (CFD No. 88-1) for Fiscal Year 2012/2013. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-043 23 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 J6. Approval to set Annual Special Tax Levy for Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 33 85-1 (CFD No. 85-1) for Fiscal Year 2012/2013. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-044 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO 35 CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 !/,'~~'~~'~~, ~ (G~n,~iuNC,, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 18, 2012 4 J7. Adoption of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities 45 District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 12-4 and ordering the annexation of such property located on the southwest corner of Archibald Ave. and 6th St. in Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (Beazer Homes Holding Corp, Owner - APN: 0210-062-08). RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-045 46 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILTIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 12-4 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 J8. Authorization to renew contracts (CO 89-136, CO 90-145, CO 93-006) with Mariposa 50 Horticultural Enterprises, Inc., of Irwindale, California, with no fee increase and consistent with the original competitive bid process for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 for the Maintenance of City Parks, Archibald Library and City and Fire District Landscape Sites, in an amount not to exceed $1,550,000 for City Facilities and $65,750 for Fire District Facilities to be funded from various general fund accounts, San Bernardino County Reimbursement Account, Capital Reserve Account, Landscape Maintenance District Accounts, CFD Account 868, Library Account 290 and Fire District Accounts approved in the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 budget. K. CONSENT CALENDAR -SUCCESSOR AGENCY K1. Release of Faithful Performance Bond No. 6294720 held in lieu of a Maintenance 51 Guarantee Bond, in the amount of $2,335,350.59, for the Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 - Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue, Contract No. RA09-014. K2. Accept the Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street 53 Improvement Project, Contract No. RA10-015 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $9,092,879.67. RESOLUTION NO. 12-108 56 A RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BIKE/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, ROUTE 66 TRAILHEAD AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. RA10-015 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L. CONSENT CALENDAR -PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY L1. Approval of Minutes: June 20, 2012 (Regular Meetinq,~_ r- ~/1'~~'~~ i ~ , ~ [i~nn.w~~~n FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 18, 2012 5 M. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL M1. Approval of Minutes: June 20, 2012 (Regular Meeting) M2. Approval of Check Register dated June 13, 2012 through July 10, 2012 and payroll ending July 10, 2012 for the total of $7,340,787.88. 57 M3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2012. 138 M4. Approval to allocate $7,250 awarded by the California State Library into Library Revenue 151 Account 1291000-4740/0-3730 and appropriate $7,250 into Expenditure Account 1291602- 5010/0-3730 for Emergency California Library Literacy Services Grant. M5. Approval to allocate $15,000 awarded by the National Endowment for the Arts into Library 152 Revenue Account 1301000-4740 and appropriate $7,500 into Expenditure Account 1301602-5200 and appropriate $7,500 into Expenditure Account 1301602-5300 for "Big Read" Grant. M6. Authorization for the transfer of one (1) 2013 Chevrolet Silverado Hybrid 2WD Crew Cab, 153 purchased from George Chevrolet of Bellflower, California, in the account of $37,811.60 in accordance to request for quote #115303, funded from Acct. No. 1105208-5604 (Air Quality Improvement Grant), to facilitate the vehicle's use by the County of San Bernardino for Police Department Services. M7. Authorization for the transfer of two (2) 2013 John Deere Utility Terrain Vehicles, purchased 154 from Cascade Turf, LLC of Montclair, California, in the amount of $35,940.53, in accordance to request for quote #115768 and one (1) 2012 Wells Cargo Enclosed Trailer purchased from Jacobsen Trailer, Inc. of Fowler, California, in the amount of $11,656.76, in accordance to request for quote #114645 funded from Acct. No. 1 381 701-5604 (Capital Outlay-Vehicle), to facilitate the vehicles' use by the County of San Bernardino for Police Department Services. 155 M8. Approval of a "Permit Parking District" for the residential area identified as "Bella Vista Drive, and Henry Street" generally located north of Hillside Road and west of Sapphire Street. RESOLUTION NO. 12-109 167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 10.50 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE M9. Release of Faithful Performance Bond No. 6294720 held in lieu of a Maintenance 169 Guarantee Bond, in the amount of $2,335,350.59, for the Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 - Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue, Contract No. 09-262. M10. Approve and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount 171 of $165,000.00 to International Line Builders, Inc., for operation and maintenance of the Arbors substation and the Municipal Utilities Electrical Distribution System within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utiltiy Services Area for FY 2012/13 to be funded from 1705303-5309 and 1705303-5603 Municipal Utility funds. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND g CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~,~~ ~ ; ~ ~ ,~,.,,~~~~:~ JULY 18, 2012 M11. Authorization to renew contracts (CO 89-136, CO 90-145, CO 93-006) with Mariposa 172 Horticultural Enterprises, Inc., of Irwindale, California, with no fee increase and consistent with the original competitive bid process for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 for the Maintenance of City Parks, Archibald Library and City and Fire District Landscape Sites, in an amount not to exceed $1,550,000 for City Facilities and $65,750 for Fire District Facilities to be funded from various general fund accounts, San Bernardino County Reimbursement Account, Capital Reserve Account, Landscape Maintenance District Accounts, CFD Account 868, Library Account 290 and Fire District Accounts approved in the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 budget. M12. Authorization to renew contract (CO 08-162) with United Pacific Service, Inc,. (UPS) of La 173 Habra, California, with no fee increase and consistent with the original competitive bid process for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 for City-Wide Tree Maintenance Services with no additional contract extensions granted thereafter in an annual amount of $620,000, to be funded from various City accounts as approved in the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 budget. M13. Accept the City Hall Main Lobby Ceiling Replacement Project, Contract No. 12-025 as 174 complete, release the bonds, accept the contractor's warranty and authorize the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $35,796.00. RESOLUTION NO. 12-110 177 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CITY HALL MAIN LOBBY CEILING REPLACEMENT PROJECT CONTRACT NO. 12-025 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M14. Authorization to renew contracts (CO 02-018, CO 09-125) with Trugreen Landcare of 178 Upland, California, with no fee increase and consistent with original competitive bid process for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 for the Maintenance of City Landscape Sites, in the amount of $680,000 to be funded from General Fund Account 316 (Street and Park Maintenance) and Landscape Maintenance District Accounts 136 (Caryn Community), 137 (North Etiwanda), 138 (South Etiwanda), 139 (Lower Etiwanda) and 140 (Rancho Etiwanda) as approved in the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Budget. M15. Approval an award for a one year services and supplies contract for existing copiers to Konica Minolta Business Solutions, Inc., of San Bernardino, California, in the amount of 179 $80,870. M16. Approve and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount 180 of $131,000.00 to Butsko Utility Design, Inc., for Technical Electrical Engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Service Area for FY 2012/13 to be funded from 1705303-5309 Municipal Utility Fund. M17. Approve and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount 181 of $132,000.00 to Applied Metering Technologies, Inc., for Installation, Configuration and Meter Reading Services within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Service Area for FY 2012/13 to be funded from 1705303-5309 Municipal Utility Fund. M18. Consideration to waive various fees and charges for the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of 182 Commerce Grape Harvest Festival and Carnival scheduled for August 17-19, 2012, at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter. ~'~ _ ~ ~,- ;~ ~ ~, , ~ a~,,..,,,N,,,, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 18, 2012 7 M19. Approval to set annual Special Taxes A and B for Community Facilities District No. 88-2 184 (Drainage and Law Enforcement) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 12-111 186 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT). M20. Approval to set annual benefit assessments for Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon 193 Drainage Basin) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 12-112 194 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS. M21. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill 205 Marketplace) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 12-113 206 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 201212013. M22. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South 213 Etiwanda) with a reduction in the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 12-114 215 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013. M23. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho 222 Cucamonga Corporate Park) with a reduction in the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 12-115 224 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK).FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013. M24. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho 230 Summit) operation of and Maintenance of Park and Parkways with no increase to the current rate. ~ : ; ~, , ~ ~,~ ~..,,,,~.,,, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA J u LY 18, 2012 8 RESOLUTION NO. 12-116 232 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "B" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 TO FINANCE THE OPERATION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF PARK AND PARKWAYS. M25. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho 239 Summit) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 12-117 240 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "A" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 M26. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 248 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 & 2), Series 2001-A with a reduction in the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 12-118 250 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 8~ 2), SERIES 2001-A. M27. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 259 (Improvement Area No. 3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B with a reduction in the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 12-119 261 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001- 6. M28. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 268 (Improvement Area No. 1, Zone 1, 2, & 3, Series 2003-A) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 12-120 270 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1, ZONES 1, 2 & 3), SERIES 2003-A. M29. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 277 (Improvement Area No. 2, Zones 1 & 2, Series 2003-B) with no increase to the current rate. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 18, 2012 9 RESOLUTION NO. 12-121 ~ 278 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2, ZONES 1, & 2), SERIES 2003-B. M30. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho 285 Etiwanda Estates) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 12-122 287 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES). M31. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner's 295 Grove) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 12-123 296 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013. M32. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador 303 on Route 66) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 12-124 304 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013. M33. Approval of Resolution establishing an annual levy for the costs incurred in the collection of 311 assessments within Assessment District No. 93-1, Masi Plaza. RESOLUTION NO. 12-125 313 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENTS DISTRICT NO. 93-1. M34. Approval of a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission regarding 320 proposed fee modifications for program activities and facilities operated by the Community Services Department. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 18, 2012 10 M35. Approval to renew contract #09-057 between NEC Corporation of America and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Telephone System Maintenance and Support Services for Fiscal Year 2012/13, in the amount of $84,992, and a contingency in the amount of $9,158, to be funded from Account No. 1001205-5300 (Contract Services). 341 N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. N1. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00571 AND ADDENDUM TO THE 342 GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A comprehensive update to the Development Code including a request to replace Title 17 (Development Code), modify Chapter 2.24 (Historic Preservation), modify Chapter 1.12 (Penalties, Administrative and Civil Remedies and General Provisions), delete Chapter 5.12 (Regulation of Entertainment), delete Title 14 (Signs), delete Chapter 19.08 (Tree Preservation) and other clarifying amendments of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code as well as a proposed addendum to the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR). This item was continued from the June 20, 2012, City Council Meeting. DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE 2012 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of a proposal to establish new development fees for Planning services as a result of the creation of new application types in the comprehensive update to the Development Code (DRC2010-00571). This item was continued from the June 20, 2012, City Council Meeting. ORDINANCE NO. 855 (FIRST READING) 414 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010- 00571, ACOMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. RESOLUTION NO. 12-101 491 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FEES FOR SERVICES RELATED TO APPLICATIONS FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW AND FOR THE MODIFICATION OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS. N2. Consideration to approve the Resolution confirming the diagrams and assessments, approve the annual Engineer's reports and order the levy and collection of annual 494 assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 for Fiscal Year 2012/2013. No increase of the assessment rate is proposed. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 18, 2012 11 RESOLUTION NO. 12-126 497 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013. N3. Consideration to approve the Resolution confirming the diagrams and assessments, 645 approve the annual Engineer's reports and order the levy and collection of annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10 for Fiscal Year 2012-2013. RESOLUTION NO. 12-127 649 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9, AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013. N4. Consideration to approve the Resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, approve ' 898 the annual Engineer s reports and order the levy and collection of the annual assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2011/2013. No increase of the assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 12-128 900 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 O. 14DVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 01. Approval of a Resolution adopting the Fire District's General Fund Final Budget for g14 Fiscal Year 2012/13 in the amount of $24,203,610. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, . ~ PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND ~ 2 ~~`~'~'~ ~'~ ' C S1~AAtUNIiA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 18, 2012 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-046 916 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FIXING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2012 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2013 P. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. P1. DESIGNATION OF A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATES FOR THE 2012 918 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING. P2. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE 922 LIBRARY FOUNDATION. P3. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per ___ Council Member.) Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING R. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra L. McKay, Assistant City ClerklRecords Manager, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 12, 2012, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. June 20, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 in the Tapia Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5;00 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were District/Council Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams, Vice President/Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and President/Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager and Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager. The following closed session items are being considered: D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR CHRIS PAXTON PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, THE MID-MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL LABOR GROUP AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES -FIRE, CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 REGARDING ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF A PERMANENT HIGHWAY EASEMENT INTEREST AND A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR FOR STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND RELATED PURPOSES FROM REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY LUPE VIRAMONTEZ AS TRUSTEE OF THE LUPE VIRAMONTEZ FAMILY TRUST DATED JULY 20, 1990 LOCATED AT 13408 BASE LINE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 0227-131-09 AND 0227-131-10. No persons were present wishing to speak. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements were made. The closed session recessed at 5:45 p.m. with no action taken. *DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 1 of 15 A special meeting of the City Council convened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams; Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director; Debra McKay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager; Adrian Garcia, Assistant City Clerk and Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk. H1. Recognition of the 2012 Youth Basketball Girls "C" Division All Stars for winning the Southern California Municipal Athletic Federation Championship. Mayor Michael presented certificates of achievement to the 2012 Youth Basketball Girls "C" Division All Stars and congratulated them on their achievements. H2. Recognition of the 2012 Youth Basketball Girls "B" Division Ballers for placing Second in the Southern California Municipal Athletic Federation Championship. Mayor Michael presented certificates of achievement to the 2012 Youth Basketball Girls "B" Division Ballers and congratulated them on their achievements. H3. Recognition of the 2012 Youth Basketball Boys "AA" Division Knicks for placing Second in the Southern California Municipal Athletic Federation Championship. Mayor Michael presented certificates of achievement to the 2012 Youth Basketball Boys "AA" Division Knicks and congratulated them on their achievements. H4. Recognition of the 2012 Youth Basketball Boys "B" Division Heat for winning the Southern California Municipal Athletic Federation Inland Valleys Championship. Mayor Michael presented certificates of achievement to the 2012 Youth Basketball Boys "B" Division Heat and congratulated them on their achievements. H5. Recognition of the U16 Boys for outstanding success in representing the 2012 Rancho Cucamonga Flames. Mayor Michael presented certificates of achievement to the U16 Youth Boys and congratulated them on their achievements. H6. Recognition of the U12 Boys Fall Program for outstanding achievement in Region, Area and Section playoffs. Mayor Michael presented certificates of achievement to the U12 Youth Boys and congratulated them on their achievements. H7. Recognition of Los Osos High School Girls Soccer Team Winners. Mayor Michael indicated that the Los Osos High School Soccer Team could not be present tonight and noted that they will be rescheduled. *DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 2 of 15 The special meeting adjourned at 6:34 p.m. The meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Financing Authority and City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. President/Chairman/Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Board Members/Board Members/Council Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams; Vice President/Vice ChairmanlMayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and President/Chairman/Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director; Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services; Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director; Veronica Fincher, Animal Services Director; Jeff Bloom, Interim Planning Director; Trang Huynh, Building & Safety Services Director; Police Chief Mike Newcombe; Debra McKay, Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk; Adrian Garcia, Assistant City Clerk and Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk. K. ANNOUNCEMENTSIPRESENTATIONS Mayor Michael noted that Mary Kuhn passed away. Mary began her career with the City in December of 1980. She worked in the Personnel Division and retired in November 1999. Mayor Michael and the members of the City Council expressed their condolences to the family. K1. Presentation of a Proclamation to Trudy Coleman and Juneteenth America, Inc., regarding "California Juneteenth National Freedom Day." Mayor Michael presented a proclamation to Trudy Coleman recognizing "California Juneteenth National Freedom Day." K2. Administration of Oaths of Office to newly re-appointed Park and Recreation Commissioners Kelly Matheny and Patricia Morris. (Mayor) Mayor Michael administered Oaths of Office to Commissioners Kelly Matheny and Patricia Morris. K3. Presentation of the American Public Power Association's 2011 Safety Award of Excellence. Fred Lyn, Utility Divisions Manager, presented the Mayor and City Council with the American Public Power Association's 2011 Safety Award of Excellence. K4. Proclamation for National Dump the Pump Day. Mayor Michael presented a proclamation for National Dump the Pump Day. *DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 3 of 15 K5. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the Freedom Courtyard Core Team and Mary Andrew on Receiving the 2012 California Park & Recreation Society (CPRS) District 11 Layman Award. Mayor Michael presented certificates of recognition to the Freedom Courtyard Core Team and Mary Andres for receiving the 2012 California Park & Recreation Society District 11 Layman Award. L1. Jerie Lee expressed a concern that the special budget meeting last Thursday was in another room and was not televised. She noted that the 2012/13 budget was not on the Internet and indicated that she would have liked to hear the deliberations on the budget. L2. Jim Moffatt indicated that the issue with military service has gotten out of hand. He noted that in 2010, Council Member Buquet did not mention his service in the military when all of the candidates were interviewed by the newspaper. Mr. Moffatt noted that the council member is evading the issue. L3. Susan Keithly indicated that she volunteers at the Animal Care and Adoption Center. She noted that the volunteers who work with the animals are concerned with the recent decision to solely use 501 c3 rescues. She requested a meeting to discuss this further. L4. Joanne Cudney stated that she has been rescuing animals on her own for 7 years. She noted that recently a Code Enforcement Officer came to her house and took pictures without identifying herself. Mrs. Cudney indicated that she wanted to obtain a kennel permit but noted that kennels are not allowed by the City. L5. Jennifer Corso indicated that she volunteers at the Animal Care and Adoption Center. She requested that the City place vinyl stickers on the front of the facility indicating that the Center was a low kill facility. Also, cameras should be placed in the facility and more adoption events should be held. L6. Janet Walton offered a prayer for the City Council and the audience. L7. Raymond Herrera expressed concerns about the recent Cinco de Mayo event. He also stated that anyone his age currently serving on the City Council who did not fight was a coward. Also, Mr. Herrera indicated that President Obama was a tyrant and that providing amnesty to the children of illegal aliens was illegal. L8. Robin Hvidston expressed disappointment that the City Council had promoted the Cinco de Mayo event in the City. She expressed a concern with the use of tax dollars to celebrate another culture. Ms. Hvidston provided information on the Mexican cartels currently operating in the United States. Council Member Buquet commented on the speakers question regarding his military service and provided a photograph of his discharge papers. John Lyons apologized to the City Council members who have served in the military. He supported the celebration of Cinco de Mayo. Lastly, Mr. Lyons commended the County Board of Supervisors for forming ajoint-powers authority that would look into establishing a program to help homeowners who are upside-down on their mortgages. *DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 4 of 15 The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. M1. Approval of Minutes: June 6, 2012 (Regular Meeting) June 6, 1021 (Budget Meeting) M2. Approval of Check Register dated May 30, 2012 through June 12, 2012 for the total amount of $114,654.94. M3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 2012. M4. Adoption of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 88-1, Annexation No. 88-12-1 located on the south side of Lemon Avenue west of Hermosa Avenue and ordering the annexation of such property to Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (Jaime Campos, Owner - APN: 0201-902-16). RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILTIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ANNEXATION N0.88-12-1 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Spagnolo, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. ~~ N. CONSENT CALENDAR -PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY N1. Approval of Minutes: June 6, 2012 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo, to approve the minutes. Motion carried 5-0. 01. Approval of Minutes: June 6, 2012 (Regular Meeting) June 6, 1021 (Budget Meeting) 02. Approval of Check Register dated May 30, 2012 through June 12, 2012 and payroll ending June 12, 2012 for the total of $4,553,902.70. 03. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 2012. 04. Release of Maintenance Bond No. PRF7615639-M in the amount of $64,426.00 for the Citywide Bridge Deck Maintenance Phase 2 of 3, Contract No. CO 10-059. *DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 5 of 15 05. Approval of Professional Services Agreement between City of Rancho Cucamonga and Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce for Economic Development Services. 06. Accept the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center LED Sign Project, Contract No. 12-017 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $51,590.00. RESOLUTION NO. 12-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER LED SIGN PROJECT CONTRACT NO. 12-017 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 07. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, adopting the amended Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for the expenditure of Measure "I" funds covering Fiscal Years 2011/2016 RESOLUTION NO. 12-083 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE AMENDED MEASURE "I" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COVERING FISCAL YEARS 2011/2016 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "I" FUNDS 08. Approval of a Resolution renewing the Professional Services Agreements with no fee increase and consistent with the original competitive bid process for Ninyo & Moore, Salem Engineering Group, Inc. and Leighton Consulting, Inc. for annual soils and materials testing services for FY 2012/2013, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City, to be funded from various individual project accounts as approved in the FY 2012/2013 Budget. RESOLUTION NO. 12-084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF AGREEMENTS WITH NINYO 8 MOORE, SALEM ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. AND LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. FOR ANNUAL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES FOR FY 2012/2013 FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY 09. Approval of a Resolution renewing the Professional Services Agreements with no fee increase and consistent with the original competitive bid process for Dan Guerra & Associates, Dawson Surveying, Inc., LEH 8 Associates, Westland Group, Inc. and CSD Land Surveying, Inc., for annual survey services for FY 2012/2013, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City, to be funded from various individual project accounts as approved in the FY 2012/2013 Budget. RESOLUTION NO. 12-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF AGREEMENTS WITH DAN GUERRA & ASSOCIATES, DAWSON SURVEYING, INC., LEH ~ ASSOCIATES, WESTLAND GROUP, INC. AND CSD LAND SURVEYING INC., FOR ANNUAL SURVEY SERVICES FOR FY 2012/2013 FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY *DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 6 of 15 010. Approval of a Resolution renewing the Professional Services Agreement with no fee increase and consistent with the original competitive bid process for Aufbau Corporation for providing annual construction inspection and engineering support services for FY 201212013, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City, to be funded from various individual project accounts as approved in the FY 2012/2013 Budget. RESOLUTION NO. 12-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF AGREEMENT WITH AUFBAU CORPORATION FOR PROVIDING ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR FY 2012/2013 FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY 011. Accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $146,411.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, J.F. Shea Construction Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $14,641.10, for the Replacement of Pedestrian Bridge Decks Crossing over Deer Creek Channel to be funded from Infrastructure Funds, Account Nos. 1198303-5650/1825198-0 and 1198303- 5650/ 1824198-0. 012. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the installation of a Solar Photovoltaic System at the Paul A. Biane Library at Victoria Gardens to be funded from Utility Fund, Account No. 17063035209 for construction of said project. RESOLUTION NO. 12-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM AT THE PAUL A. BIANE LIBRARY AT VICTORIA GARDENS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 013. Accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Band and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 16227-1, located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Meritage Homes of California, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 12-088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16227-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 014. Consideration of approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual Engineer's report, declaring the City Council's Intention to levy annual assessments with Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2012/13 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 12-089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS • DRAFT' Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 7 of 15 OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 RESOLUTION NO. 12-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 RESOLUTION NO. 12-091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON 015. Consideration of approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual Engineer's report, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, inclusive, for Fiscal Year 2012/13 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 12-092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 THROUGH 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 RESOLUTION NO. 12-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 THROUGH 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 RESOLUTION NO. 12-094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 THROUGH 8, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON 016. Consideration of approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual Engineer's report, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10 for Fiscal Year 2012/13 and setting the time * DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 8 of 15 and place for a public hearing thereon. (Revised staff report submitted) RESOLUTION NO. 12-095 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 36, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9, AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-13. RESOLUTION NO. 12-096 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9, AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-13. RESOLUTION NO. 12-097 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 36, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9, AND 10 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. 017. A Resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Mid-Manager, Supervisory/Professional and General Labor Group for the period 2012-2014. (Removed for Discussion) RESOLUTION NO. 12-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE MID-MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/ PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEE LABOR GROUP RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2012-13 AND 2013-14 018. A Resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino Public Employees Association for the period 2012- 2014. (Removed for Discussion) RESOLUTION NO. 12-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2012-13 AND 2013-14. *DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 9 of 15 019. Approval to transfer a City vehicle to the County of San Bernardino for Police Services. 020. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, providing for the pre-tax treatment of cost-sharing contributions to PERS under Section 414 (H) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code RESOLUTION NO. 12-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE PRE- TAX TREATMENT OF COST-SHARING CONTRIBUTATIONS TO PERS UNDER SECTION 414 (H) (2) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE 021. Accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $205,538, to the lowest responsive bidder, MG Enterprises, and authorize the expenditure of $205,538, plus a 10% contingency in the amount of $20,554; and authorize the appropriation and award of $50,000 (County grant) from fund 1272401- 5650; receive community contributions in the amount of $88,272 into Fund 272 and appropriate and award these funds for the Freedom Courtyard Project expenditure from Fund 272; and award $25,000 from Fund 120305-5650/1802120-6314 (Park Development); $26,480 from Fund 18882000-2313 (Park Trust Fund); and $36,340 from Fund 1882000-2354 (Park Trust Fund). (Removed for Discussion) City Manager John Gillison addressed Item 016 (Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10}, noting that the agenda title was incorrect as there will be an assessment increase in LMD 6-R}. Mayor Michael removed Items 017 and 018 for discussion. Council Member Buquet removed Item 021 for discussion. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Buquet, to approve the staff recommendations in the remaining staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. 017. A Resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Mid-Manager, Supervisory/Professional and General Labor Group for the period 2012-2014. (Removed for Discussion) RESOLUTION NO. 12-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE MID-MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/ PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEE LABOR GROUP RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2012-13 AND 2013-14 018. A Resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino Public Employees Association for the period 2012- 2014. (Removed for Discussion) RESOLUTION NO. 12-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA *DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 10 of 15 AND THE SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2012-13 AND 2013-14. 021. Accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $205,538, to the lowest responsive bidder, MG Enterprises, and authorize the expenditure of $205,538, plus a 10% contingency in the amount of $20,554; and authorize the appropriation and award of $50,000 (County grant) from fund 1272401- 5650; receive community contributions in the amount of $88,272 into Fund 272 and appropriate and award these funds for the Freedom Courtyard Project expenditure from Fund 272; and award $25,000 from Fund 120305-5650/1802120-6314 (Park Development); $26,480 from Fund 18882000-2313 (Park Trust Fund); and $36,340 from Fund 1882000-2354 (Park Trust Fund). (Removed for Discussion) Mayor Michael referenced agenda items 017 and 018 noted that many hard decisions have been made to balance the FY 2012/13 budget, including layoffs, furloughs, etc. He thanked the employees for partnering with the City during this d~cult time. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo concurred, and clarified the comments that he had made to the Daily Bulletin, which were taken out of context. Council Member Alexander noted a point of order. Council Member Buquet indicated that he removed agenda item 021 as an example of a good partnership with the community to honor our veterans. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Buquet, to approve the staff recommendations in agenda items 017, 018 and 021. Motion carried 5-0. The following Ordinances have been introduced for first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. The Fire Board, or Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by a Board Member, or Council Member. P1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN SUBAREA 18 TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2010-00685 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 5.3.2. of the Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 18 to add language requiring compliance with the building height limits in the LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Related Files: LA/Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan DRC2010-00157 and Development Code Amendment DRC2010-00984. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 854 (SECOND READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (IASP) SUBAREA 18 AMENDMENT DRC2010-00685, AMENDING SECTION 5.3.2 OF THE IASP SUBAREA 18 BY ADDING LANGUAGE REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITS IN THE LA/ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILITY PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. The Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager read the title of Ordinance No. 854. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo to adopt Ordinance No. 854 for second reading. Motion carried 5-0. *DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 11 of 15 The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. Q1. Adoption of a resolution making determinations regarding the proposed annexation of territory (Beazer Homes Holding Corp., Owner - APN 0210-062-08 -Annexation No. 12- 4) located on the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street to an existing Community Facilities District, calling a special election and authorizing submittal of levy of special taxes to the qualified electors. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 12-4) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY Rob Ball, Fire Marshall, presented the staff report. Chairman Michael opened the public hearing. With no one wishing to speak, Chairman Michael closed the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to adopt Resolution No. FD 12-029. Motion carried 5-0. The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. R1. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00571 AND ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A comprehensive update to the Development Code including a request to replace Title 17 (Development Code), modify Chapter 2.24 (Historic Preservation), modify Chapter 1.12 (Penalties, Administrative and Civil Remedies and General Provisions), delete Chapter 5.12 (Regulation of Entertainment), delete Title 14 (Signs), delete Chapter 19.08 (Tree Preservation) and other clarifying amendments of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code as well as a proposed addendum to the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR). DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE 2012 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of a proposal to establish new development fees for Planning services as a result of the creation of new application types in the comprehensive update to the Development Code (DRC2010-00571). * DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 12 of 15 ORDINANCE NO. 855 (FIRST READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00571, A COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF RESOLUTION NO. 12-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FEES FOR SERVICES RELATED TO APPLICATIONS FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW AND FOR THE MODIFICATION OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS City Attorney James Markman indicated that staff is requesting that this item be continued to July 18, 2012. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to continue this matter to July 18, 2012. Motion carried 5-0. The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. S1. Authorize the purchase and installation of one (1) lot of systems furniture, fixtures, and walls from GM Business Interiors, Inc. in the amount of $745,587.40, utilizing a competitively bid contract awarded by the County of San Bernardino, Contract Number 10-209, funded from Account Number 2660801-565011650660-0 (2004 Tax Allocation Bonds) and authorize the related appropriations into the appropriate account numbers to be determined by staff. (S1 and S2 discussed together. Revised staff report submitted) S2. Authorize the purchase and installation of one (1) NEC SV8300 telephone switch, hardware, and software from NEC Unified, Inc., in the amount of $36,711.36, utilizing GSA contract number GS-35F-0511T 877, funded from account numbers 2660801- 5650/1650660-0-$30,103.32 (2004 Tax Allocation Bonds) and 1188313-565011525188-0- $6,007.31 (Integrated Waste Management) and authorize the related appropriations into the appropriate account numbers to be determined by staff (S1 and S2 discussed together. Revised staff report submitted). Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager, presented the revised staff report City Attorney James Markman noted that the proposed action specifically identifies the source of funds, which is the 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds. In response to Mayor Michael, Mrs. Daniels noted that the Department of Finance has disapproved this request as there was not a contact in place at the time the legislation was enacted. She noted that there is a risk that if we proceed with this action and it is not approved by the Department of Finance and the subsequent lawsuit is not successful, that the City will need to fund this expense in another manner. In response to Mayor Michael, City Attorney James Markman indicated that other cities have been identified in multiple counties that would join the City of Rancho Cucamonga in a lawsuit, if needed. Council Member Buquet noted for the audience that the City issued the tax allocation bonds in 2004 with the expressed intent to complete capital improvements. We are currently constructed *DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 13 of 15 the municipal yard, which is being stopped due to a technicality. The City is being forced to take this action. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations as corrected in both of the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. T1. PRESENTATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ABOUT THE CLEAN-UP EVENT THAT OCCURRED ON MAY 19, 2012. (ORAL REPORT) Kurt Keating, Code Enforcement Supervisor, presented the staff report. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo, Mr. Keating indicated that there was a great response from the community. Speaker cards may be submitted for all those who wish to speak on the following topic(s). Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals wishing to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council, not to members of the audience. U1. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF INTERSECTION AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AT PECAN AVENUE (SHELBY PLACE NORTH) AND BASE LINE ROAD OVER A PORTION OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 0227-131-09 AND 0227-131-10 AS PART OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. SUBTT18806. RESOLUTION NO. 12-102 A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF INTERSECTION AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AT PECAN AVENUE (SHELBY PLACE NORTH) AND BASE LINE ROAD OVER A PORTION OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 0227- 131-09 AND 0227-131-10 AS PART OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. SUBTT18806 Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. In response to Council Member Buquet, Mr. James confirmed that this property is already encumbered with utilities and provides access and utility easements to other properties to the north. Mr. James also confirmed that 6,300 square feet is needed for roadway purposes and 1,200 square feet is needed for temporary construction purposes. Also, in response to Council Member Buquet, he indicated that the improvements would be done by a third party. *DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 14 of 15 In response to Mayor Michael, Mr. James displayed and commented on the map on Page 775. Mr. James indicated to Mayor Michael that development could potentially occur to the north and west of the take. Mayor Michael opened the hearing. Stephen P. Janis from the firm of Banks, Garcia 8~ Janis indicated that he is represents Lupe Viramontez, Trustee of the Viramontez Family Trust. He thanked Mr. James for a thorough presentation and indicated that his questions have been answered. Mayor Michael closed the hearing. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo to adopt Resolution No. 12-102. Motion carried 5-0. V. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. V1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) No announcements were made. W. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified. Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 9:12 p.m. in the memory of Mary Kuhn. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved::**** * DRAFT* Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes June 20, 2012 -Page 15 of 15 W W U ►► 000 A Q LLA t` a ) LL. w. U Jy bd t . 1 T` U �i Y ,. . U � p � � 40- Cam, •— cn c- G 0_ 0 _ O E U C6 cn _0 a--A 0 U j 0 }' O p C: - _0 U) O O N > 4-j - N - c O O M ::T N M N Cfl LO M ti M "zl- L L W Z m L O E m U U � O t � U M M O O O O O c O m L C U C O N M zt LO CO ti 00 O O N O O O O O O O O O O O �- O O O O O O O O O O O O O > N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q ro" � rOn M" cn W Ir RS o -: NOW h r to a (7) Q O � U •— to �. _ 0 � V � N � Ln - ------ I LV Qft co I � 1 N _..____.._.._..._ L O a cam• M O I ` y C 0 0 di rcy Tdi J � "C ` i o_ ` 0 em C 16 i 0 a awl u 3 /� Z '► _ c : �- O Z � W W a � a w 0 W } � z ° oc oc � w O Q °- a LLJ LL V W Z x � W V • tis •SANO�� r>�� _y O N L N O 4-O O O N (U =. L N p a. U N >+ o on aU -0 X a� � > (U 4-JWE O = •U a) 0 �O N Ln M O -61 0 � O O -p N O .61 � U Q O .� O i U O L f� O - E Ln _ .�..i O O N .L O N MOD N U 'N E 4-J aJ O O _ U C:on E Z E •� O L o � � '� a of ;o U4 >> L L L (� O "0 O E T � c O >' N w � L O 4-J ,0 f0 _ 4-# Q� 00 0 >% c � ., U E 3 N ° 0 vi 0 vi O O ✓Ind .0 OU 4-J >> On O "0 = O O U 0 u CD 4-J +� and � � � VAN QJ � � 4>7 V) V) 4-Jc cam' °' 0 on 'c c O � „ }, ca a NE EE c � a) uvr -cam O � 41 N L- '-' u �� a�i E 0 *L' °- v L Ong �' N Loner �' u �Y_ _� 3 o O 4; 0 +, on+� c 3 cC a W `� � r � v � -�v ^ v a � L a�', 3 c o uN N =3 4-J 3 � L�+ o Oc3 to won N 0 0 +-+ r �o 3a o. v +� >' 0 0 Ln E +� N u c . J on L � � Y � u N L 04-J u C 0 fC sue+ u = � u 0 '^ ++ L E .0 2 � C vNL N0 3 >, � NL � O ONfC CLn 0E -0 -c � N ^ � o � � E 0 � � 0L N N U1L0 RfX N00 L�'0 � 0 00 � O � N c7 c u w u r tO >1 O >. 0- vl >- }+ O O O O O 0 0 a +�7}`j 2z O Q 0 E v � u ° E � � 0 3 aU o0 CN u v E a �N On U V u v (1)� D .0 :3 C7 0 > V >% u u U 0 4-J o 0 0 u a ON O ra V °ry Tl- _a 1 r r •: i i r tPo ; LLJ LLI ujs. r I� fi • U SZ V T L � r ru -0 N Q Z C �> 0 N u a O Z a'' u Q U N 'r f� 13- a--+ m m u � N E N +O-+ N -0 N i Ou N -p E 22 \ 1 > E 0 � v � E •r N tn.� M 3 N on (Z o N fZ 4-j C O N a-1 O m O •^ � Q Q u E O E (0 5, O O N E a0cV) u uQ O u it u u` U Sz U� On C •r. •N Q) Q� '0 .C: U .� L a CL � .� of a c * c o a > N •a ° a.., W ,� c 3 3 0 � o ALP, i �: vv CZ, r }' _ f6 � > N 3 On a v V 4 O o O v L 1 f 0 v O C -p N N u .� N � - Q1 �O C: (U L 4J � O c '� .4-J r� O v U \ >% N aL-+ On cC v > - O O u O p 4-J N (1) 4- O N 0 a--> >, L � O C C N v 4-1 aJ d� O � t/� >+ a-+ 'n _0 O O N at cn U U p LA 4-J O i f a0 } i � onp � � o O , � U a., p M U p 4-+ O .0 -_ O 4-J a N ' O u N J 4-J f O a-+ O j, v- ~ d Ln QU Z� 4 w N � o _ m s D Z3 p +' L O Z O Q O fl- C D 0 0 "O V Q V u nnnn C L N W C N N � _ GJ N O J O V) CO) O .0 Q O O >> O v a L N 0 C r� v > > Rs O L 4-J O Q L L W (a -C t/1 0 0 D d-J N f� QJ f J f� 0 L U z a s UZ3 V E 0 L ? O O p - p 4-J 0 0 H t d D n �' ' i on C O > N c fU O On C � 1 N 4-+ QJ O C L v O .v L- a` a � on N x 3 a J O v Q J v O a •O N N d L U N d n. =) 4-J on E > O .� v QJ v C on U 'O N -0 O L C � N 4-J tin o 4-J on i Q •r � C N on •� �_ L f� � .0 J 1 ro " O On a U a U 4- C O- O Q) fo 'Q Q •: N N +j 0 4-J U N L L U v M 4_j "p C: QJ Z3 D N '� N Q) U N N •� �} •p an N a-0 � i U O .� U N O O U � N I O •�- N o Q) O N •Q) Q) O ra > V) > UV, 3 ■� V) M M ga S�SS W� ^� W N M U •U U a--J L 0 O U 0 4-J d ^ V) 0 0 va � 0 � (15 CL f� (� .� N 00 C = 0 O 0 > 7 co N E � fV Ln on � U (u 0 L 4-J Q) U N J C O� O = v N O -J O� �•L— N (u cLS 4- L L U �aU � �' � v _j U c 0 a Q) Q V U on ro co 0 -0 4 � v L N 0 � d v E one a on w u ° � on Q) V � w Z o� -o a M 4 -+ •i U a-+ on C p L L ° a� C' °u ON E 4.j 4-J ° ° 00 L �- U M Z OI U u N D .0 0 v •� U u o u U O p O u N Q � ore �- o U RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P1 Agenda Check Reeister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325840 2012/07/03 1 ALL STAR GLASS 220.30 AP 00325862 2012/07/03 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 50.43 AP 00325862 2012/07/03 l CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 16.81 AP 00325862 2012/07/03 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 20.90 AP 00325565 2012/07/03 ( CERVANTES, MIGUEL 261.00 AP 00325871 2012/07/03 ( CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS Ii• 162.70 AP 00326039 2012/07/03 ( ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 2,326.86 AP 00326041 2012/07/03 ( CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 5,712.00 AP 00326041 2012/07/03 l CALIFORNA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 248.11 Ap 00326049 2012/07/03 ( RAYNE WATER CONDITIONING INC 26.25 Ap 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 197.54 AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135.07 AP 00325829 2012/06/281 LN CURTIS AND SONS 322.43 AP 00325576 2012/06/271 AGILINE INC 40.00 AP 00325578 2012/06/27 ( ALL CITIES TOOLS 304.54 AP 00325578 2012/06/27 ( ALL CITIES TOOLS 148.01 AP 00325588 2012/06/27 ( ASR CONSTRUCTORS 49,320.17 AP 00325547 2012/06/21 ( AIRGAS WEST 19.09 AP 00325547 2012/06/21 ( AIRGAS WEST 36.16 AP 00325547 2012/06/21 ( AIRGAS WEST 137.89 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 242.64 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 143.91 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DIS'T'RICT 691.10 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 317.19 Ap 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP 00325091 20]2/06/131 49ERCOMMUNICATIONS 1,598.59 AP 00325099 2012/06/131 ALSCO 51.11 AP 00325099 2012/06/131 ALSCO 52.71 AP 00325099 2012/06/131 ALSCO 82.87 AP 00325099 2012/06/131 ALSCO 54.90 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 f ALSCO 52.21 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 43.91 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 42.31 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 68.46 AP 00325099 2012/06/131 ALSCO 46.59 AP 00325099 2012/06/131 ALSCO 45.02 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 114.10 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 71.34 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 66.93 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 f ALSCO 70.23 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 114.70 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 92.92 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 43.02 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 42.04 Ap 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 46.41 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Curren[ Dale: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 92.92 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 41.66 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 123.03 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 41.38 AP 00325331 2012/06/14 ( EMCOR SERVICE 1,205.64 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 41.38 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 58.73 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 39.80 pP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 71.32 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 74.01 AP 00325099 2012/06/131 ALSCO 72.91. AP 00325099 2012/06/131 ALSCO 121.44 AP 00325099 2012/06/131 ALSCO 72.92 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 8847 AP 00325099 2012/06/131 ALSCO 43.14 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 42.65 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 42.89 AP 00325099 20]2/06/13 ( ALSCO 91.22 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 283.92 AP 00325099 2012/06/13 ( ALSCO 121.68 AP 00325103 2012/06/13 ( ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 2,326.86 AP 00325144 2012/06/13 ( CLOUGHESY, DONALD 540.00 AP 00325348 2012/06/20 l ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 329.75 AP 00325348 2012/06/20 ( ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 667.28 AP 00325348 2012/06/20 1 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 345.53 AP 00325345 2012/06/20 ( ALFORD, TIM 200.00 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 50.91 AP 00325337 2012/06/141 LN CURTIS AND SONS 378.20 AP 00325337- 2012/06/14 l LN CURTIS AND SONS .127.15 AP 00325327 2012/06/141 AIRGAS WEST 46.63 AP 00325206 2012/06/13 1 LARKIN, DAVID W 284.60 AP 00325204 2012/06/13 1 LAFFIN, PHILIP 200.00 Ap 00325]97 2012/06/13 ( INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 283.50 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 84.07 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 93.00 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 304.35 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 596.22 AP 00325192 2012/06/13 1 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 193.94 AP 00325191 2012/06/13 1 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM - 11.32 AP 00325227 2012/06/13 ( NEXTEL 202.29 AP 00325225 2012/06/13 ( NAPA AUTO PARTS 14.54 AP 00325225 2012/06/13 ( NAPA AUTO PARTS 16.98 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 30.37 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 265.50 AP 00325213 2012/06/13 l MAGNUSON, PETER 50.00 P2 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:1 RANCHO, CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Aeenda Check Re¢ister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. AP 00325211 2012/06/13 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00325211 2012/06/131 00325457 00325449 00325448 00325448 00325448 00325446 00325446 00325446 00325446 00325446 00325446 00325446 00325446 00325446 00325446 00325441 00325441 00325428 00325428 00325426 00325425 00325425 00325418 00325408 00325403 00325402 00325402 00325397 00325380 00325375 00325372 00325371 00325366 00325366 00325366 00325366 00325366 00325366 00325366 00325366 00325364 00325305 2012/06/201 2012/06/20 I 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/20( 2012/06/20( 2012/06/201 2012/06/20( 2012/06/20( 2012/06/20( 2012/06/20 2012/06/20( 2012/06/20 2012/06/20 2012/06/20( 2012/06/20 1 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/20 1 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/20 1 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/20( 2012/06/20( 2012/06/20 2012/06/20 2012/06/20 2012/06/20 2012/06/20( 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. MIJAC ALARM COMPANY MARK CHRISTOPHER INC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC LIFE ASSIST INC LIFE ASSIST INC LIFE ASSIST INC LIFE ASSIST INC LIFE ASSIST INC LIFE ASSIST INC LIFE ASSIST INC LIFE ASSIST INC LIFE ASSIST INC LIFE ASSIST INC KME FIRE APPARATUS KME FIRE APPARATUS INDEPENDENT STATIONERS INDEPENDENT STATIONERS ICE MACHINE SALES AND SERVICE CO HOYTLUMBER CO,SM HOYT LUMBER CO., SM HARRIS, TY FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS FLEX-A-CHART FLEETPRIDE FLEETPRIDE EXERCISE EQUIPMENT SERVICE CO. CONSUMERS PIPE-FONTANA CDW-G CARQUEST AUTO PARTS CARNES, SANDRA G. BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. BASTIAN, DAVID VERIZON CALIFORNIA P3 Amount 168.59 8.55 80.27 30.00 126.43 2,004.74 2,555.24 276.30 1,256.38 7.10 21.25 207.21 31.67 1,519.17 414.41 2,459.01 5,431.14 21.25 485.95 227.01 54.75 5.62 294.49 85.09 6.52 250.00 662.61 1,237.14 71.38 32.14 488.93 2,298.48 565.06 24.50 424.08 364.43 527.44 4,324.95 122.84 739.91 1,349.57 131.99 75.96 250.00 531.19 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 07/I1/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Re>?ister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. ~ Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325305 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 80.03 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.65 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 112.26 AP 00325290 2012/06/13 1 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 81.00 Ap 00325290 2012/06/13 1 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 73.00 AP 00325290 2012/06/13 1 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 42.00 AP 00325284 2012/06/13 1 STATE FIRE TRAINING 65.00 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 725.93 AP 00325273 2012/06/13 1 SHRED PROS 55.00 AP 00325246 2012/06/13 f RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIF 180.00 AP 00325246 2012/06/13 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIP 70.00 AP 00325240 2012/06/13 ( PF SERVICES INC 578.31 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 36.55 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. -61.37 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 81.77 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 54.80 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 50.78 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 175.07 AP 00325208 2012/06/131 LOMALINDAUNIVERSITY 191.26 AP 00325206 2012/06/13 1 LARKIN, DAVID W 370.35 AP 00325191 2012/06/13 I HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 71.10 AP 00325175 2012/06/13 I GALLS INC 4,101.83 AP 00325169 2012/06/131 FLEETPRIDE II5.38 AP 00325165 2012/06/13 1 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 533.36 AP 00325147 2012/06/13 1 CONFIRE JPA 2,959.97 AP 00325147 2012/06/13 ( CONFIRE JPA 11,839.90 AP 00325147 2012/06/13 1 CONFIRE JPA 14,799.87 AP 00325144 2012/06/13 ( CLOUGHESY, DONALD 540.00 AP 00325105 2012/06/13 ( ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,852.50 AP 00325111 2012/06/13( BAUERCOMPRESSORS - 247.48 AP 00325566 2012/06/27 ( KILMER, STEPHEN 1,098.64 AP 00325567 2012/06/27 l WALKER, KENNETH 320.43 AP 00325464 2012/06/201 NUSTAGROUP.COM 1,226.48 AP 00325483 2012/06/201 PLUMMER, GARY 261.00 AP 00325497 2012/06/20 l SAN BERNARDINO CTY 3,168.50 AP 00325497 2012/06/20 ( SAN BERNARDINO CTY 633.70 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 214.87 AP 00325519 2012/06/201 UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC 500.00 AP 00325520 2012/06/201 UNIFIRSTUNIFORMSERVICE 60.49 AP 00325528 2012/06/201 VAN GAALEN LOCK & KEY 363.56 AP 00325533 2012/06/201 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.59 AP 00325614 2012/06/271 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 237.29 AP 00325543 2012/06/20 ( WINZER CORPORATION 255.52 AP 00325538 2012/06/20 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 86.33 AP 00325538 2012/06/20 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 258.99 P4 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 07/11/: Report; CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout 'Time: 07:1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Aeenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount Ap 00325538 2012/06/20 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 517.99 AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 473.73 AP 00325533 2012/06/201 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 550.02 AP 00325533 2012/06/20 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.42 AP 00325533 2012/06/20 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 119.25 AP 00325666 2012/06/271 GRAINGER 103.57 AP 00325666 2012/06/271 GRAINGER 514.45 AP 00325659 2012/06/271 FLEETPRIDE 69.52 AP 00325654 2012/06/271 EXERCISE EQUIPMENT SERVICE CO. 1,091.23 AP 00325640 2012/06/27 ( DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTEC 88.00 AP 00325640 2012/06/27 ( DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTEC 357.38 AP 00325637 2012/06/27 ( DAVENPORT, JAY E. 96.96 AP 00325614 2012/06/27 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 24.50 Ap 00325614 2012/06/27 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 7.92 AP 00325770 ~ 2012/06/27 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 88.56 AP 00325770 2012/06/27 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 45.96 Ap 00325770 2012/06/27 l SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 85.83 AP 00325770 2012/06/27 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 85.84 AP 00325770 2012/06/271 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 57.64 AP 00325770 2012/06/27 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 54.22 AP 00325770 2012/06/27 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 16.5 l AP 00325770 2012/06/27 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 140.85 AP 00325769 2012/06/27 ( SMART AND FINAL 68.08 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 44.18 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 387.50 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 61.37 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 72.84 AP 00326068 2012/07/101 EMCOR SERVICE 524.00 AP 00326065 2012/07/101 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC ~ 2,794.51 AP 00325811 2012/06/27 I WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 79.65 AP 00325808 2012/06/27 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 1,725.09 AP 00325806 2012/06/27 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 175.80 AP 00325898 2012/07/03 ( FLEETPRIDE 171.95 AP 00325898 2012/07/03 ( FLEETPRIDE 57.47 AP 00325897 2012/07/03 ( FLEET SERVICES INC. ~ 808.43 AP 00325896 2012/07/03 ( FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION 60.62 Ap 00325891 2012/07/03 ( ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO. 31.50 AP 00325891 2012/07/03 l ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO. 31.58 AP 00325887 2012/07/03 l EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 96.98 AP 00325881 2012/07/03 ( DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTEC 548.00 AP 00325881 2012/07/03 1 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTEC 88.00 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,142.77 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,055.40 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,359.18 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 852.84 P5 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Dale: 07/11/: Repor[: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount Ap 00325995 2012/07/031 SIGMANET 2,263.03 AP 00325972 2012/07/03 I PATTON SALES CORP 378.07 AP 00325941 2012/07/03 I MARLINK SA INC 135.00 AP 00325934 2012/07/03 1 LIGHTHOUSE, THE 457.77 AP 00325934 2012/07/03 ( LIGHTHOUSE, THE 13.53 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.42 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.42 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 f VERIZON CALIFORNIA 57.81 Ap 00326021 2012/07/03 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.59 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.70 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.70 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.70 AP 00326015 2012/07/03 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 58.79 AP 00326010 2012/07/03 ( TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 40.00 AP 00326008 2012/07/03 ( STRESS LESS EXPRESS LLC 425.00 AP 00325934 2012/07/03 1 LIGHTHOUSE, THE 38.87 AP 00325932 2012/07/03 I LEBA, QUANG 261.00 AP 00325932 2012/07/03 I LEBA, QUANG 125.00 AP 00325932 2012/07/03 ( LEBA, QUANG 57.22 AP 00325932 2012/07/03 l LEBA, QUANG 180.00 Ap 00325922 2012/07/03 ( ISG INFRASYS 482.90 AP 00325918 2012/07/03 ( HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 23.74 AP 00325902 2012/07/03 I FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 19.72 AP 00326074 2012/07/101 EMCOR SERVICE 1,615.00 Ap 00326074 2012/07/10 ( EMCOR SERVICE -1,615.00 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 157.16 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 123.66 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 7.67 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE L39 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 5.43 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 33.25 AP 00325806 2012/06/27 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 179.49 AP 00325806 2012/06/27 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 76.18 AP 00325806 2012/06/27 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA ~ 43.69 AP 00325799 2012/06/271 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 58.79 AP 00325793 2012/06/27 l TINDER, JOHN 600.00 AP 00325790 2012/06/27 ( TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 65.00 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,575.84 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,003.92 AP 00325769 2012/06/27 ( SMART AND FINAL - 68.08 Ap 00325740 2012/06/27 ( RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,640.03 AP 00325740 2012/06/271 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,660.00 AP 00325713 2012/06/27 ( NIKKIS FLAG SHOP 329.76 AP 00325687 2012/06/271 INTELLIBRIDGE PARTNERS LLC 610.00 Ap 00325682 2012/06/27 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 246.51 P6 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Curren[ Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check ReEister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325682 2012/06/27 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 95.30 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 326.04 AP 00325526 2012/06/20 ( UNITROL STINGER SPIKE SYSTEMS 234.70 AP 00325520 2012/06/20 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 58.79 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 536.00 AP 00325501 2012/06/201 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 90.16 AP 00325497 2012/06/20 I SAN BERNARDINO CTY .2,534.80 EP 00002614 2012/06/271 AIIIJMADA, ALEXANDER R 1,774.52 EP 00002615 2012/06/271 ALMAND, LLOYD 752.86 EP Ob002616 2012/06/271 BANTAU, VICTORIA 384.76 EP 00002616 2012/06/271 BANTAU, VICTORIA 842.06 EP 00002617 2012/06/27 l BAZAL, SUSAN 1,315.75 EP 00002617 2012/06/271 BAZAL, SUSAN 899.65 EP 00002618 2012/06/271 BERRY, DAVID 819.26 EP 00002619 2012/06/271 BILLINGS, ESTER 225.99 EP 00002620 2012/06/271 CARNES, KENNETH 631.44 EP 00002621 2012/06/27 ( CLABBY, RICHARD 819.26 EP 00002622 2012/06/27( CORCORAN, ROBERT 1,700.78 EP 00002623 2012/06/27 ( COX, FAYE 165.81 EP 00002624 2012/06/27 ( COX, KARL 752.86 EP 00002625 2012/06/27 ( CRANE, RALPH 2,215.40 EP 00002626 2012/06/27 ( CROSSLAND, WILBUR 443.62 EP 00002627 2012/06/27 1 DAGUE, JAMES 1,700.78 EP 00002628 2012/06/27 l DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 794.39 EP 00002629 2012/06/271 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A. 1,700.78 EP 00002630 2012/06/271 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 2,244.61 EP 00002631 2012/06/271 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 819.26 EP 00002632 2012/06/271 HEYDE, DONALD 1,700.78 EP 00002633 2012/06/27 ( HQTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 739.03 EP 00002633 2012/06/27 1 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 961.75 EP 00002634 2012/06/271 LANE, WILLIAM 2,244.61 EP 00002635 2012/06/27 ( LEE, ALLAN 1,405.36 EP 00002636 2012/06/27 ( LENZE, PAUL E 1,215.87 EP 00002637 2012/06/27 f LONGO, JOE 165.81 EP 00002638 2012/06/27 ( LUTTRULL, DARRELL 631.44 EP 00002639 2012/06/27 ( MACKALL, BENJAMIN 165.81 EP 00002640 2012/06/27 ( MAYFIELD, RON 2,913.62 EP 00002641 2012/06/271 MCKEE, JOHN 1,451.08 EP 00002642 2012/06/27 l MCMILLEN, LINDA 448.17 EP 00002642 2012/06/271 MCMILLEN, LINDA 304.69 EP 00002643 2012/06/27 I MCNEIL, KENNETH 2,215.40 EP 00002644 2012/06/27 ( MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 1,700.78 EP 00002645 2012/06/27 I MORGAN, BYRON 2,010.82 EP 00002646 2012/06/27 ( MYSKOW, DENNIS 819.26 EP 00002647 2012/06/27 f NAUMAN, MICHAEL 819.26 P7 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT A¢enda Check ReEister . 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. EP 00002648 EP 00002649 EP 00002650 EP 00002651 EP 00002652 EP 00002653 EP 00002654 EP 00002655 EP 00002656 EP 00002657 EP 00002658 EP 00002659 EP 00002660 EP 00002661 Check Date 2012/06/27( 2012/06/271 2012/06/27 2012/06/271 2012/06/27( 2012/06/27 I 2012/06/27( 2012/06/27( 2012/06/27( 2012/06/27( 2012/06/27( 2012/06/27( 2012/06/27( 2012/06/27( Vendor Name NEE,RON NELSON, MARY JANE PLOUNG,MICHAELJ POST, MICHAEL R SALISBURY, THOMAS SMITH, RONALD SPAGNOLO, SAM SPAIN, WILLIAM SULLIVAN~, JAMES TAYLOR, STEVE TULEY,TERRY VANDERKALLEN,FRANCIS WOLFE, DUANE YOWELL, TIMOTHY A Total for En[ity: P8 Amount 2,913.62 165.81 819.26 1,575.82 1,774.52 819.26 443.62 631.44 913.52 1,215.87 1,700.78 1,774.52 2,215.40 2,913.62 254,966.83 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Dale: 07/11/; Time: 07:1 d 0 E U U r c O U v_ ~~ a+ N C odr C d ~ N r w ~ ~ O N d ~ ~ O O ~ O M d ~ ~p c ii ~ ~ ~a P U ~~Q~D J / f i Y Q W b M f i ~w° O $ ~' N ~ 0 ~ m o ~ o r n m N N N O O O' O O' N m o n o m M f' M m YI N O O ~ O 0' ~ l a ~ I ° € ~ ~ l a ~ O ~~ a° Y d mj e m r O b N O e M ~ 0 .n m a m o G o ~ N m ~ m m qi 'G! N o e a n m m a r d q J[ ~ A O ~ T M a 17 l q O O Y q ~ r Vrl ~ 0 q! ~ 1~ N N o v a r r r m o m M M d- q 0 0 O ~ N ~ ~ 0 ' m O 1A O ~ 0 a ° ~ n ~ o c vi a n ~F A m C °c S IL q U W E w uqi _~ - ~i y ' C d Q F O1 ~J a '~ ~ i J LL C C O d N V N 7 a C cd a VC C d._ q L U8r N ~~ d m ~.. 3 U a~ H L C N d ~ d O ~ d d E ~~ qti o m a n L d T U U - n d ~ m c d c Elm m j W j C ~ _ O da v c O % O T d m N pO' a T 3 d L G ¢ ~ O E ' ~ N N E W o d d N m .L. N .L, m C C O rEH d d _" g a '^ d d LLda a c c y d d O .L_, U 0 a y o qda ~ E ~ - o d a n° c y d > > v> m ~ ~ E q ~ O > O N r O M V C~~ ap V d L O V m d b ~pp { U d t 3cm da T'U c N € w U m O d d ~aL tea.. ;, mda 1 c c c 3 ~ C' qt d m m a C ~ j d - O e Eda it M r A m yL!!~ ~ V ~ C E C O) ° YI m d a E ~ i+1 do o i $a m ~ nom d ~y N~5 >~ _<< d- ~~ m d U L ~ ~ Q ~ c C T d d " C N q q d ~a> ~ 0 T d U C O C N d m C m y ~ O~ O y Z ~ d F m O d M N C T ~ q t d 0 ~ O O O N G ~ m and a } m > ~ m '~ d u) m ~ O ~ o i ~ d ~ .E u U Q W ~ U Q w ~ P9 way Q N m LL O_ f > O al ~ s O 6 K a ~ a N O b O N N_ O O ao .~ a a C y o d ~ ~ Y a a ~" ~o f 3 'C w o~ mI n OI y 0 0 m m q lNl ~K O m 0 N N ~ m m q O O > r r Y N y 8 m ~ m ~ O O 0 m ~ q O O > r r 0 N N ~ a y ~ O O W « d '~ ~ E O°~ ~' C d ~ N ~ m m O O) C o > ° ~ °. V C 1 N A _ N _ N d N N O a a 0 ~ q o 0 d d c ~ d O ~ ~ ~~ o LL O O AW ~ a ~ e° a' d a m 0 ~ c > N Q m m H S c d V N m p o 2 ~ ~ N LL H A z m N w z_ U m 2 m W Q Q Q a U ~ p A J 3 0 a a N C LL c b N o o d C T C Q o 0 O Y J N N 0 N r 0 O O m m 0 0 m m O m m O O m 0a_ N OI m m P O O O O O O O N N n r m m m m P V 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 O O O O 0 0 N N N O 0 m 0 n m Y r n t O w U E ~ m 6 ~ LL J ~ ~ a w a p ~ W N LL 3 0 E c ~ O m 6 0 U N y o N T d a w d a ,.~ IL ~ 0 m O m N Q ac 0 E y a O m 4 C S h 0 O m Y N N S N a r 0 n i i m d m rn Q C «R 0 P10 w a N ~ ¢ O ~ > o i LL o a ~ a ~ a C 0 0 K N m m a ~D N ~ ~ m T~ 0 ~ o n ry N O O W d 4 f v u $ rd q N 9 4' O H m m ~ m ~ > + n y 0 p) 0 8 m 1O m N V ~~ W~ H C L d N 0 10 C d U N O ~ W N d N +~ O M O d ~ o c LL ~ ~' o a° ~j a d »~ N cG e a mm ~~ eA j A Q m Q pM N m M e'1 T N n n `m m m e 0 e 5 Z K 0 LL J Q U LL 0 0 Y e Z N m m Z m ~_ ~ Z d' a c C ~ u ° ~ Q o C Y d U ~ N a ~ a m °o U d N r N 0 n n a OI N n C N d f v a r a m U 0 H P11 w a LL O ~ - a o i ~ z d n f a C 0 N 0 rc m a U R R m b C O 6 E d a d N N N a a+ V r O N _ a' y ~ M a 7 O OI ~` ~ ` r V d C l6 m 3 O ~ ~ O c ° //~~ li .O •~ 4A - q d L_ O v ~ a N r w ~ LL ° N v a ~ m d C N 7 N T O n_ N a e ei Eli m m ~ ~ O z LL H z N W J Z A 2 E W bR ~ ¢ ~ N J y ~ ~' U ~ t O ~ J 0 g m v c c E ii ~ d O 5 E o m d C T C a O a o m o U J y r. O O 0 O 5 0 LL J U 0 E ~ y Z N T ~ L Z c f !3 ~ N O O Q O C Y O L Q N a ° N o a u'i i t Y Z m z F y o ¢ W ~ K F U rt LL Z ~ J J j v O ~ W W LL LL c n V N Q~ N VI O O m 1'll _N T C W Q W N Q ~ y W LL a ~ m IL ei n O O i N W F 0 U F Z Q W K _ ~ ~ E r n N ~ LL y Q U O O C m A Y Q J U_ m C rp ~ ~ O a q e N N b r ,: 0 m m N d m b O w a~~- ~¢~ LL ~ n o s ~~ 8 r rc o a ¢ a ~ d 0 C 0 a 0 K P13 Pooled State of California Money Investment Account Market Valuation 5/31 /2012 Description Carrying Cost Plus Accrued Interest Purch. Fair Value Accrued Interest United States Treasu Bills $ 17,023,917,280.94 $ 17,038,454,000.00 NA Notes $ 13,977,570,543.76 $ 14,036,500,000.00 $ 17,752,543.00 Federal A enc SBA $ 537,643,786.27 $ 537,920,691.88 $ 561,057.27 MBS-REMICs $ 341,326,441.71 $ 372,036,649.27 $ 1,627,671.62 Debentures $ 750,600,944.28 $ 751,188,000.00 $ 1,121,668.50 Debentures FR $ - $ - $ - Discount Notes $ 4,791,501,388.76 $ 4,799,289,000.00 NA GNMA $ 14,465.84 $ 14,592.59 $ 142.9, IBRD Debenture $ 399,931,803.28 $ 400,000,000.00 $ 922,224.OG IBRD Deb FR $ - $ - $ - CDs and YCDs FR $ 800,000,000.00 $ 800,000,000.00 $ 222,437.22 Bank Notes $ - $ - $ - CDs and YCDs $ 9,050,184,110.57 $ 9,049,348,212.86 $ 9,721,840.23 Commercial Pa er $ 3,099,244,569.37 $ 3,099,221,874.99 NA Co orate: Bonds FR $ - $ - $ - Bonds $ - $ - $ - Re urchase A reements $ - $ - $ - Reverse Re urchase $ - $ - $ - Time De osits $ 4,355,640,000.00 $ 4,355,640,000.00 NA AB 55 & GF Loans $ 9,055,458,171.26 $ 9,055,458,171.26 NA TOTAL $ 64,183,033,506.04 $ 64,295,071,192.85 $ 31,929,584.81 Fair Value Including Accrued Interest $ 64,327,000,777.66 Repurchase Agreements, Time Deposits, AB 55 & General Fund loans, and Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost). P74 STAFF REPORT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: July 18, 2012 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst II RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES AND TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE HELLMAN FIRE STATION 177 LANDSCAPING, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 3289501-5650/1597289-6314 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Fire Board approve the plans and specifications for the Hellman Fire Station 177 Landscaping project and approve the attached resolution, #FD 12-042, authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS: Staff is requesting authorization from the Fire Board to proceed with advertising the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Hellman Fire Station 177 Landscaping project. The construction project for the station was Contract No. FD 10-006 and was accepted as complete on April 18, 2012. During construction of Hellman Fire Station 177, it was decided to significantly revise the landscape theme for that station. The station site would serve as a demonstration project to assist those planning on installing Fire Wise landscape on their residential properties. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Safe Council would be instrumental in distributing pamphlets to the public, during events where they are represented, that would direct them to the station site to see examples of Fire Wise landscaping plants and design. The proposal received during the construction phase from the station's contractor to install this altered landscaping plan proved to be too expensive. As such and in an attempt to avoid delaying the opening and operation of the station, the original landscaping was deleted from the contractor's scope of work, with the intent to do a complete redesign of the new landscape treatment, and rebid the landscape portion of the project separately. .. P75.. HEI..I MAN FIRE STATTON 177 LANDSCAPING IDLY 18, 2012 PAGE 2 The projected timeline for the landscaping project estimates it will be complete by December 2012. The landscape project will add no additional costs above what was originally budgeted for the Hellman Fire Station project. Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications for the Hellman Fire Station 177 Landscaping project and approve the attached resolution, #FD 12-042, authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". Respectfully submitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution No. FD 12-042 P16 IL I D H ID D ~ I J ~ Q T ~ t wLal ~ ; , .. i , -- I BEEC V I y~ _~ _ i i pl__ WiLSpI~I A_T_ .~_ K- Y~' T ~ .__ _.f .J \ ~ ~ ~ 1 1210E RIG T- 2 O FiI/ ' Hellman Fire Station 177 --+-Y Landscaping r ~._~~ BASE {TNE RD I ~',1~ I ~ ~ -y°t r ~ Q ~ , - ~ , ~+- w Z S1'w~~~~~\ ~) 3~ I _ __ -.- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 JERSE9 ~ tllT,l p I rclL~.ar sr, I- ~~ ~ 4TH S~! .J Vicinity Map Hellman Fire Station 177 Landscaping RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-042 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HELLMAN FIRE STATION 177 LANDSCAPING" IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamohga. WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the plans and specifications presented by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "HELLMAN FIRE STATION 177 LANDSCAPING". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 21, 2012, sealed bids or proposals for the "HELLMAN FIRE STATION 177 LANDSCAPING" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the "HELLMAN .FIRE STATION 177 LANDSCAPING". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. They can also be found at www.dir.ca.gov/ under the "Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for P17 Resolution No. FD 12-042 -Page 1 of 4 each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5; as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the P18 Resolution No. FD 12-042 -Page 2 of 4 work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defihed in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. If the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. "The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable .laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to, a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor), or, both a Class "C-27" License (Landscaping Contractor) and a Class "C-29" License (Masonry Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number(s) on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. In an effort to go green and paperless, digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal, including any future addenda or revisions to the bid documents, are available by going to www.ciolist.com and signing up, by going to Member Login or Member Signup (it's free), then choose California, then scroll down to San Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities, then scroll down to Rancho Cucamonga and click on City Projects, then click on the Project of interest under the Title and follow directions for download. Note, copies of the plans, specifications, bid proposal, addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from the above website then printed. Prospective bidders must register for an account on www.ciolist.com to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s) and to receive email updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained on this site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to the bid documents, it is the responsibility of each prospective bidder to register with www.ciolist.com and to check this P19 Resolution No. FD 12-042 -Page 3 of 4 P20 website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to registered prospective bidders from www.ciplist.com. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "HELLMAN FIRE STATION 177 LANDSCAPING" may be directed to: Walter C. Stickney, PE Associate Engineer 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2740, ext. 4076 (e-mail at walt.sticknevCa~cityofrc.us) or Pamela Pane Management Analyst II 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2770 ext. 3006 (e-mail at pamela.pane(a~citvofrc.us) All questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids must be in writing (e-mail is acceptable) and received by the City no later than 5:00 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District is not responsible for questions undeliverable. ADVERTISE ON: July 26, 2012 and August 2, 2012 Resolution No. FD 12-042 -Page 4 of 4 P21 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: July 18, 2012 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Janet Walker, Management Analyst II RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY Subject: FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (CFD NO. 88-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Fire board adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax levy for Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2012/13. Pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Facilities Act of 1982, the Fire Board is authorized to annually levy the tax rate for fire protection services. BACKGROUND On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board adopted an Ordinance authorizing the annual levy of a special tax in CFD 88-1. The Ordinance authorized the District, by Resolution, to annually levy the special tax for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, purchase of equipment and operations and maintenance costs for fire protection services. This voter approved CFD and associated special tax was first initiated in Fiscal Year 1989/90. Fiscal Year 2012/13 is the twenty-fourth (24th) consecutive year the District has levied a special tax to provide required revenues for capital improvements (land, fire station facility, equipment) and fire protection services (personnel, operations and maintenance (O&M)) within this CFD. Accordingly, the Fiscal Year 2012/13 budget includes fully burdened personnel costs associated with existing memorandums of understanding between the District and its bargaining units as well as all related operations and maintenance costs, and capital improvements. ANALYSIS Due to the continued down economy, for Fiscal Year 2012/13, staff is proposing that the rates remain at the same level as FY 2011/12 tax levy for all developed property. The proposed fiscal year 2012/13 special tax levy will cover only a portion of the ongoing personnel and fire station 08M costs within the CFD; all remaining costs are covered by the Fire General Fund. The attached Resolution submitted for your approval establishes the recommended annual special tax to be levied in Fiscal Year 2012/13, which remains unchanged from Fiscal Year 2011/12, and is identified in Exhibit "A". The maximum special tax which could be levied has been adjusted utilizing P22 APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.88-1 (CFD NO. 88-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 JULY 18, 2012 the State of California, Department of Finance methodology for adjusting appropriations limits for State and Local Governments and for adjusting the maximum special tax rate that could be levied and is illustrated in Exhibit "B" of the Resolution,. The recommended special tax levy remains at less than half the special tax which could be levied, with the exception of the vacant land rate. During the budget workshops held on June 6 and June 14, 2012, the proposed CFD budget was reviewed. Respectfully submitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachment Resolution No. 12-043 Annual Report CFD 88-1 Map P23 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-043 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This community facilities district shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by ordinance, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said community facilities, district, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year and to adjust the maximum special tax authorization to be levied. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year (2012/13) for the referenced District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: P24 A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness, if any; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds, including sinking funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, including the administration of the special tax levy; D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: That the maximum authorized special tax rates for all developed properties are hereby adjusted pursuant to Ordinance No. 17. The maximum authorized special tax rates are set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "B". SECTION 6: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 7: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 8: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "public improvements," "special tax" or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 9: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. Resolution No. FD 12-043 -Page 2 of 5 P25 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the_ day of July 2012. Executed this _ day of July 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 12-043 -Page 3 of 5 P26 EXHIBIT "A" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 SPECIAL TAX LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 SPECIAL TAX LEVY SPECIAL TAX LEVY TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2U11/12 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $463.24 $463.24 (more than 3590 SF) B. Residential Class II $356.94 $356.94 (3077 to 3589 SF) C. Residential Class II $284.09 $284.09 (2564 to 3076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $248.26 $248.26 (2308 to 2563 SF) E. Residential Class V $214.97 $214.97 (2051 to 2307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $195.79 $195.79 (1795 to 2050 SF) G. Residential Class Vll $176.58 $176.58 (less than 1795 SF) Commercial/Industrial Property $712.77 per acre or $712.77 per acre or $0.064 $0.064 per sq.ft. or bldg per square foot or building area, whichever is greater . area, whichever is greater. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200 per lot or parcel $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre $10.00 per acre SF =Square Feet Resolution No. FD 12-043 -Page 4 of 5 P27 EXHIBIT "B" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 DEVELOPED PROPERTY MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $991.78 (more than 3590 SF) B. Residential Class II $761.23 (3077 to 3589 SF) C. Residential Class III $607.48 (2564 to 3076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $532.46 (2308 to 2563 SF) E. Residential Class V $455.65 (2051 to 2307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $420.86 (1795 to 2050 SF) G. Residential Class Vll $380.58 (less than 1795 SF) H. Commercial/Industrial Property $1,527.93 per acre or $0.1236 per sq.ft. or bldg area, whichever is greater. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre SF =Square Feet $1,040.18 $798.38 $637.13 $558.44 $477.89 $441.40 $399.15 $1,602.49 per acre or $0.1296 per square foot or building area, whichever is greater. $200.00 per lot or parcel $10.00 per acre NOTE: Escalation of maximum special rate. Calculation. formula Fiscal Year 2012/13 Pop. Change 'CPI 1.07 X 1.0377 = 1.0488 *CPI -California Per Capita Personal Income Resolution No. FD 12-043 -Page 5 of 5 P28 Resolution No. FD 12-043 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.88-1 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY 2012 P29 Resolution No. FD 12-043 BACKGROUND On Apri14, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-I and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District) adopted an Ordinance authorizing the District, by Resolution to annual levy a special tax in CFD No. 88-1 for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, and purchase of equipment and operations and maintenance costs for fire protection services. CFD No. 88-1 is located within the boundaries of Highland, Cherry, Day Creek Channel and the San Bernardino National Forest. The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted for (a) changes in cost of living (CPI); or (b) changes in the cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. The change in the CPI for Fiscal Year 2012- 2013 is1.0488 %. P30 DEVELOPED APPROVED UNDEVELOPED Resolution No. FD 12-043 FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 A. Residential Class 1 B. Residential Class 2 C. Residential Class 3 D. Residential Class 4 E. Residential Class 5 F. Residential Class 6 G. Residential Class 7 H. Commercial/Industrial $463.24/SFD $356.94/SFD $284.09/SFD $248.26/SFD $214.97/SFD $195.79/SFD $176.58/SFD $712.77/ACRE or $0.064/ SQ. FT. or whichever is greater $200.00/LOT OR PARCEL $10.00/ACRE P31 Resolution No. FD 12-043 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: COMMUNICATIONS $ 63,490.00 FIRE ADMINISTRATION, $ 98,530.00 OTHER SERVICES $1,688,070.00 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0.00 $1,850,090.00 SOURCES: TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCE $ 583,940.00 DELINQUENCIES $ 77,720.00 FEES $ 1,500.00 REIMBURSEMENTS $ 10,000.00 SPECIAL TAX $1,176,930.00 $1,850,090.00 P32 i ~O ~O *'r` V 'i w - ny ~~~ay~ m c J m ~ N = ~ w 3 m o 0 V ny ua~{!II!W ny uaneH ny ~~aH D nt/ pleq!uoab' ny uewllaH ~g ue!lau~e~ epu 18 ~{aaa~ nea ny aa~sauoo~ a ~~ ~ ~' C ~ J ~ ~ _? z ~.~._- C N ~ ~ ~' C N m a~ r m (n r .~ ~ o ~ ~ = U U ~ ~~ ~ 4 J ti•r J ~ D u7 0 r ~Se3 ~ L_ ~"-"-"~ ny epuenn!~3 ny ~a~sauoo~ ny ua~{!II!W ny uaneH ny esow~aH nb' Pleq!uo~'d •~ ~ '~ ny uewllaH I~ t L ny p e~(au!n iE'2eF;s~_frP FY v$£°E~~s Xy ~ o E ~ ?3$EC °"~yFSY~E ~ - _ ny anal ' ~~ ~=;; 083 C~ (n Q _a~. ~Ypak L 3 w ~ ~- a f3For:T'p eSfio ° Q ;vs > ~s~~g~Y€'~F~" ~ O g Y€~~.~.`u 3~ ;g €aa ~~~~E~=F " ~~~5~~ c t° ~ ~ u ~ gJ~ ~ ;u ° E o g Epe€Yr"e? t l~~ ' d y o o 2S :€ e. _se i4 "8 ~s~g$~F~~~ STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: July 18, 2012 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (CFD NO. 85-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Fire Board adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax levy for Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fiscal Year 2012/13. Pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Facilities Act of 1982, the Fire Board is authorized to annually levy the tax rate for fire protection services BACKGROUND On December 10, 1985, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services. The special tax is necessary to provide the required operation and maintenance revenue specific to ongoing fire protection and life safety services within the CFD. This voter approved Mello-Roos CFD and associated special tax was first initiated in FY 1986/87. At the time that CFD No. 85-1 was formed, the Mello-Roos Act provided that the Board of Directors, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 85-1, may, by ordinance, levy the special taxes at the rate and apportion such special taxes in the manner specified in the Rate and Method. Each year since CFD No. 85-1 was formed the Board of Directors has adopted an ordinance to levy the special taxes within CFD No. 85-1. The Mello-Roos Act has subsequently been amended to provide that the legislative body of a community facilities district may initially provide for the levy of a special tax by ordinance and through the enactment of such ordinance provide, by resolution, for the levy of the special tax in the current or future tax years. On May 18, 2011, an ordinance was introduced authorizing the levy of special taxes within Community Facilities District No. 85-1 by resolution rather than by ordinance. The ordinance was adopted and became effective July 1, 2011. P33 P34 APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY PAGE 2 FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.85-1 (CFD NO. 85-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 JULY 18, 2012 ANALYSIS It has been determined that there are sufficient revenues available in the CFD to meet all financial obligations without an increase to the CFD for fiscal year 2012/13. Therefore, the annual special tax rate for 2012/13 will remain unchanged from fiscal year 2011/12. The maximum tax rate which could be levied is adjusted per the March Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange Co. Consumer Price Index (CPI). The attached Resolution submitted for your approval establishes the recommended annual special tax to be levied in Fiscal Year 2012/13 as identified in Exhibit "A". The maximum special tax which could be levied is illustrated in Exhibit "B" of the Resolution, utilizing the lesser of: (a) changes in cost of living (CPI); or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code. Changes in cost of living (CPI) for 2012/13 are calculated at 2.0237% while changes in per capital cost of living and changes in population resulted in a calculation of 4.88%. Therefore, the lesser of the two calculations, the per capita cost of living (CPI) of 2.0237% is utilized to determine the maximum special tax rate. During the budget workshops held on June 6 and June 14, 2012, the proposed CFD No. 85-1 budget was reviewed by the Board. The proposed special tax levy rate for Fiscal Year 2012/13 is listed below. FISCAL RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL YEAR DWELLINGS PROPERTIES PROPERTIES 2011/12 $151.71 per DU $151.71 per AC + .082 SF Proposed 2012/13 $151.71 per DU $151.71 per AC + .082 SF Respecttu y submitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachment Resolution No. 12-044 Annual Report CFD 85-1 Map $151.71 per AC + .100 SF $151.71 per AC + .100 SF P35 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-044 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"), (a) initiated proceedings in 1985 to (i) form the Foothill Fire Protection District Community Facilities District No. 85-1 ("CFD No. 85-1") and (ii) authorize the levy of special taxes within CFD No. 85-1; (b) held a public hearing regarding the foregoing and formed CFD No. 85-1; and (c) conducted an election on December 10, 1985 and more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition authorizing the levy of special taxes in CFD No. 85-1, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by ordinance, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the annual levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said community facilities district at the rate and apportion the special tax in the manner specified in the resolution adopted pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 53318 of the Government Code), except that this-Board of Directors may levy the special tax at a lower rate; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors desires to levy a special tax in the Community Facilities District for the fiscal year 2012/13. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1: Levy of Special Tax. That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year (2012/13) for the referenced District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 2: Exemat Properties. That properties or entities of the State, Federal or other local governments shall be exempt from such special tax. SECTION 3: Use of Special Tax. That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: P36 (a) The construction, acquisition, expansion and/or rehabilitation of public facilities, within or for the benefit of the Community Facilities District generally described as follows: Fire protection and suppression facilities and appurtenances, including; equipment, real property and other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or longer. (b) The services to be provided within the Community Facilities District are generally described as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations and maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection within the Community Facilities District. (c) The repayment of advances and loans. The special tax shall be used solely for the purposes specified above and for no other purpose. SECTION 4: Annual Adjustment in Maximum Special Tax. Pursuant to authorization of the qualified electorate, this Board of Directors hereby declares that it shall annually adjust the maximum special tax based upon the lesser of: (a) changes in cost of living; or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code occurring within the Community Facilities District in the immediately preceding fiscal year. (c) The maximum authorized special tax rates are set forth in the attached referenced and incorporated Exhibit "B" SECTION 5: Collection of Special Tax. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes. Resolution No. FD 12-044 -Page 2 of 5 P37 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the_ day of July 2012. Executed this _ day of July 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 12-044 -Page 3 of 5 P38 EXHIBIT "A" SPECIAL TAX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 IN MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STRUCTURES Residential Multi-Family 2 DU: 3 DU: 4 DU: 5-14 DU: 15-30 DU: 31-80 DU: 81 - up DU: ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX ($151.71) per DU 1.75 ($151.71) 2.25 ($151.71) 2.65 ($151.71) 2.65 ($151.71) 6.15 ($151.71) 10.65 ($151.71) 23.15 ($151.71) + {.35 (TU - 4) ($151.71)} + {.30 (TU - 14) ($151.71)} + {.25 (TU - 30) ($151.71)} + {.20 (TU - 80) ($151.71)} Commercial ($154.78) per acre + $.082 per SF Industrial ($154.78) per acre + $.100 per SF NOTE: DU =Dwelling Unit TU =Total Units SF =Square Foot Reduction Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. Resolution No. FD 12-044 -Page 4 of 5 P39 EXHIBIT "B" MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 IN FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PER CAPITA COST MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX OF LIVING CHANGE 2011/2012 BASE FOR 2012/13 2.0237% $151.71 DU $154.78 DU MAXIMUM ANNUAL STRUCTURES SPECIAL TAX Residential ($154.78) per DU Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 ($154.78) 3 DU: 2.25 ($154.78) 4 DU: 2.65 ($154.78) 5-14 DU: 2.65 ($154.78) + {.35 (TU - 4)($154.78)} 15-30 DU: 6.15 ($154.78) + {.30 (TU - 14)($154.78)} 31-80 DU: 10.65 ($154.78) t {.25 (TU - 30)($154.78)} 81-up DU: 23.15 ($154.78) + {.20 (TU - 80)($154.78)} Commercial ($154.78) per acre + .084per SF Industrial ($154.78) per acre + .102 per SF NOTE: DU =Dwelling Unit TU =Total Units SF =Square Foot Reduction Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. Resolution No. FD 12-044 -Page 5 of 5 P40 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.85-1 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. FD 12-044 JULY 2012 P41 BACKGROUND On December 10, 1985, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District") voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit and to annually adjust the special tax and appropriations limit based upon changes in the cost of living and changes in population. The district is bounded generally on the north by the 210 Freeway, on the east by Etiwanda Ave. on the south by Fourth Street and on the west by Archibald Avenue. The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted for (a) changes in cost of living (CPI); or (b) changes in the cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. It has been determined that there are sufficient revenues available in the CFD to meet all financial obligations without an increase to the CFD for fiscal year 2012/13. Therefore, the annual special tax rate for 2012/13 will remain unchanged from fiscal year 2011/12. The maximum tax rate which could be levied is adjusted per the March Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange Co. Consumer Price Index (CPI). FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 The change in the CPI for Fiscal Yeaz 2012-2013 is 2.0237%. P42 Resolution No. FD 12-044 FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 STRUCTURES RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY 2DU: 3DU: 4DU: 5-14 DU: 15-30 DU: 31-80 DU: 81-UP DU COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX 151.71 PER DU 1.75($151.71) 2.25($151.71) 2.65($151.71) 2.65($151.71) + {.35(TU-4)(151.71)} 6.15($151.71) + {.30(TU-14) (151.71)} 10.65($151.71)+ {.25(TU-30) (151.71)} 23.1s($1s1.71>+ {.2o(TU-ao) (151.71)} ($151.71)per acre + $.082 per sq ft. ($151.71)per acre + $.100 per sq ft. P43 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT FIRE ADMINISTRATION, OTHER SERVICES DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE DELINQUENCIES FEES -- REIMBURSEMENTS SPECIAL TAX Resolution No. FD 12-044 $ 416,460.00 $1,383,780.00 $4,720,830.00 $ 0.00 $6,520,070.00 $ 40,300.00 $ 179,100.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 10,000.00 $6,286,070.00 $6,520,070.00 P44 N I i c0 C) - E 6 'i Q�: _j CO w ,' u_ CO C L.) 0 4M ! o Q .441-_ AV AJJayQ t: cn % r • r �� J m •� I ca 3 ia,c } o V m u_° ¢` SU inialliiir i VIL ! -c ri" . .._.._..,nb ISeD II eft. my epuenng3 ny epueM!}3 la ilaa�° ea 1' O i ' ' .._.. ny Jaisapou m �. V ny aaisayooH i I - i n ua IW —.._.._..—•-_y•! ny ua W i IIAy � \'-'-/ b' uane H i i I m''s ny uaneH ny esoua.laH • ny eSOWJaH i r4-% AV pleq!4oJb i Ii nb pleG!4oN i ny ueumIaH • I • .- co ny ueuallaH 1 -4 •." E V i paeAeu!A Is ue!lauaeo / ny t �=j§Ei evil*,,, ......-.4 ... „„„:p.._.._: pigp141.1 i , ..14..41111111110 ._.._..7.._.._. ._..• ' 111111 gtgii or ny 9A0-19 t E. -L"' r ■65 00 :cZ p a a> >, 1c1.1� o t CT) /1 141161112 154ii5 11,i P45 STAFF REPORT R~INCHO CUCdMONG~1 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: July 18, 2012 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING RESULTS OF ASPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNffY FACILfIIES DISTRICT N0.85.1, ANNEXATION N0.12~ AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVE. AND6TH ST. IN COMMUNfN FACIILRIESDISTRICT N0.85-1(BEAZER HOMES HOLDING CORP,OWNER-APN: 0210-062-08) RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of a resolution declaring results of a special election in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 12-4 (a proposal to create a 119 unit development on 18.7 acres at the southwest corner of Archibald Ave. and 6th St.). BACKGROUND On May 16, 2012, the Board declared its intention to annex APN 0210-062-08 into CFD No. 85-1. On June 20, 2012, a public hearing was held regarding the annexation and following such hearing, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution calling for a special election to submit the qualified electors of the Annexation Territory a ballot measure pertaining to the authorization to levy a special tax within the Annexation Territory. A special election was scheduled for June 27, 2012. On June 27, 2012, the landowner submitted their ballot to the Board Secretary. The Board Secretary has canvassed the ballot and completed the statement of votes cast (see Exhibit "A" of Resolution). The Landowner cast their vote unanimously in favor of the levy of the special tax in the Annexation Territory. Adoption of this resolution constitutes the formal action of the Board declaring the results of the election and the annexation of the Annexation Territory to Community Facilities District No. 85-1 and directs the recordation of an amendment to the existing Notice of Special Tax Lien. By recordation of this amendment, prospective purchasers of property within the Annexation Territory will have notice of the special tax obligation affecting such property. ~tfully su miffed, Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachments 1. Resolution No. FD 12-045 2. CFD 85-1 Map P46 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-045 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILTIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 12-4 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed is known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 12-4 ("Annexation Territory"), and, WHEREAS, the Board did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified voters of the Annexation Territory a proposition to levy a special tax in the Annexation Territory; and, WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the measure voted upon did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified voters, and the Board desires to declare the favorable results of the election and to order the annexation of the Annexation Territory to the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. The Board hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, as submitted by the Election Official, said Statement setting forth the number of votes cast in the election, the measure voted upon, and the number of votes given for and/or against the measure voted upon. A copy of said Certificate and Statement is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", referenced and so incorporated. SECTION 3. The Secretary is hereby directed to enter in the minutes of this meeting the results of the election and the STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST. SECTION 4. The Board hereby orders the annexation of the Annexation Territory to the District and further determines that the Board is now authorized to levy the special taxes within the Annexation Territory as approved and authorized by the qualified electors of the Annexation Territory. P47 SECTION 5. Immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, the AMENDMENT TO THE NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN (NOTICE OF ANNEXATION) shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2012. Executed this _ day of 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 12-045 -Page 2 of 3 P48 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )SS RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ) THE UNDERSIGNED, AS ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 12-4 SPECIAL ELECTION In said Fire Protection District held on Tune 27, 2012. I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes cast in said District, and the whole number of votes cast for the Measure in said District, and the totals of the respective columns and the totals as shown for the Measure aze full, true and correct. I. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST: II. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES FOR FOR 19 AND AGAINST PROPOSITION A AGAINST 0 WITNESS my hand and official Sea] this 3`a day of July, 2012. Election Official Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District State of California 1\GJVIUUVII IVV. 1 V IL'VYJ r4l~G J VI J !~ ~1' QO 1 1 DO ~ co ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ . ~ N •~ ~ 0 Q ~ Q ~ ~ ~ . y.+ Q 1 • V .` V ny ua~!II!W C O N epuenn!~3, ~aaJ~ lea __ ny Ja~sayoo~ ny uaneH ~ i i ny esowJaH i ny Pleq!yoJt~ ! i ny uewllaH ~S uegawe~ ~ U OZ xo z~ ae LY° - U VJ N ~, ~ c 'u~ ca m ny ~(JJay~ m c J N N fG m .r ~ r_^^ ^^ll V/ W C L J ~ ~ T (n M~ W P49 a~ ~ ~ m •- d' w 3 O ~ L Q .r ~ \ J .~ ~ C U U d ~ ~: d ~ ~,r ~ ~ ny Ja~sayoo~ ny ua~!II!W N o ny uaneH X a~ Q ny esowJaH ny pleq!yoJb' ' ~ ~, ~ ~ ny uewllaH ~,i'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ny pJel(au!n 1 ~8`.°_~e_3~A.~ t• ~ n a W LL V/ •4 3 L ~ o ~ E LL ¢ € ~~ ..E 3£ ~~ €a i a :a e~ ~~ O u~ 0 r ~Se~ VJ L ny epuenn!~3 STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT ~~~~ Date: July 18, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Mike Bell, Fire Chief gy; Dean Rodia, Parks/Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer Subject: AUTHORIZATION TO RENEW CONTRACTS (CO 89-136, CO 90-145, CO 93-006) WITH MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, INC., OF IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA, WITH NO FEE INCREASE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF CITY PARKS, ARCHIBALD LIBRARY AND CITY AND FIRE DISTRICT LANDSCAPE SITES, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,550,000 FOR CITY FACILITIES AND $65,750 FOR FIRE DISTRICT FACILITIES TO BE FUNDED FROM VARIOUS GENERAL FUND ACCOUNTS, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT, CAPITAL RESERVE ACCOUNT, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ACCOUNTS, CFD ACCOUNT 668, LIBRARY ACCOUNT 290 AND FIRE DISTRICT ACCOUNTS AS APPROVED IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council and Fire Board of Directors approve the authorization to renew contracts (CO 89-136, CO 90-145, CO 93-OD6) with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc., of Irwindale, California, with no fee increase and consistent with the original competitive bid process, for Fiscal Year 2012- 2013 for the maintenance of City parks, Archibald Library, and City and Fire District landscape sites, in an amount not to exceed $1,550,000 for City facilities and $65,750 for Fire District facilities to be funded from various General Fund accounts, San Bernardino County Reimbursement account, Capital Reserve account, Landscape Maintenance District accounts, CFD account 868, Library account 290 and Fire District accounts as approved in the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Mariposa is one of three landscape contractors used by the City to provide maintenance services at various landscape sites citywide. The City Council has previously awarded contracts (CO 90-145, 89-136, 93-006) to Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc. Mariposa has submitted a letter of intent expressing their desire to continue service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga with NO rate increase for the 2012-2013 fiscal year. Mariposa has provided good service during the last year and staff recommends continuing the contract with this contractor with the same scope of work as Fiscal Year 2011-2012. Re ec f IIyBa miffed William Wittkop Public Works Services Director Mike Bell Fire Chief P50 WW/DR:kh STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARThfENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the Successor Agency John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineeri g Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Enginee Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer RANCHO cUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 6294720 HELD IN LIEU OF A MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,335,350.59, FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PHASE 4 -GROVE AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. RA09-014 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Successor Agency authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 6294720 held in lieu of a Maintenance Guarantee Bond, in the amount of $2,335,350.59, for the Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 -Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue, Contract No. RA09-014. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Southwest Construction Company Inc. 2909 Rainbow Valley Blvd. Fallbrook. CA 92028 Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer P51 MAS/JAD/SH:Is P52 sr PROJECT Vicinity Map Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trai] Phases 4a and 4b Grove Ave to Amethyst Ave Please see attached Memo: Item K2. Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street Improvement Project- Resolution No. 12-108—'TITLE REVISED` P53 STAFF REPORT c- ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: July 18, 2012 CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Successor Agency John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineer L.6) Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer 6* Subject: ACCEPT THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BIKE/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, ROUTE 66 TRAILHEAD AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. RA10-015 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND, AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $9,092,879.67 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Successor Agency accept the Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street Improvement project, Contract No. RA10-015, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $8,259,323.45 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of$9,092,879.67. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street Improvements scope of work consisted of the construction of overcrossing bridge structure, reconstruction and widening of Foothill Boulevard, construction of storm drain, installation of traffic signal, street light, landscaping, and associated civil work. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: > Account Number: 2660801-5650/1189660-0 > City Council Approval to Advertise: April 7, 2010 > Publish dates for local paper: April 13 and 20, 2010 • Bid Opening: September 23, 2010 • Contract Award Date: October 6, 2010 • Low Bidder: Riverside Construction Company, Inc. > Contract Amount: $8,259,323.45 > 10% Contingency: $825,932.35 Please see attached Memo: Item K2. Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 P54 Trailhead and Street Improvement Project- Resolution No. 12-108—*TITLE REVISED* SUCCESSOR AGENCY STAFF REPORT Re: Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street Improvement Project July 18, 2012 Page 2 ➢ Final Contract Amount: $9,092,879.67 ➢ Difference in Contract Amount: $833,556.22 (10.09%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of fifty-six (56) Contract Change Orders (including the balancing statement). The notable changes that were significant to the increase of the Contract amount were: Install a temporary street light and power supply at Casa Volante entrance; tree removals in excess of the bid quantities; SCE plan changes after project was bid; cost incurred for extra depth waterline; and grinding, street sweeping and traffic control for AC overlay. The Balancing Statement accounted for increases and decreases in the bid quantities. Respectfully submitted, • Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/CB/SH:Is Attachment Item K2. —*TITLE REVISED* cra i-4 MEMORANDUM ' ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT L Date: July 18, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Successor Agency John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Sark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer OS Subject: City Council Successor Agency Agenda —July 18, 2012 — Item K2 Due to two minor change orders that were not submitted at the time the agenda was prepared, the amount of the final contract cost needs to be recalculated and therefore we ask that the improvements be accepted by the City Engineer, upon reconciliation of the final accounting. Therefore, Engineering Services Department is requesting the following City Council Agenda item title to be revised to the following: K2 ACCEPT THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BIKE/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, ROUTE 66 TRAILHEAD AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. RA10-015 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND, AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, SUBJECT TO RECONCILIATION OF THE FINAL ACCOUNTING. RESOLUTION NO. 12-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BIKE/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, ROUTE 66 TRAILHEAD AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. RA10-015 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK P55 VICINITY MAP ,~; r' _ _ _ _~~~~ ~u NICEST E cLu I ~~ __ •r f~ SAN I ~l I a 19TH O ( ~~E LINE D 1~^ CHU HST BLVD a < '\ TH ST ^ 6TH '~~~ /. .J 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BIKE/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ROUTE 66 TRAILHEAD AND STREET WIDENING PROJECT ~~`° N''' FROM SAN BERNARDII~'O RD TO VINEYARD AVE N.T.S. P56 RESOLUTION NO. 12-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BIKE/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, ROUTE 66 TRAILHEAD AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. RA10-015 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A' NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street Improvement project, Contract No. RA10-015, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the Successor Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aeenda Check ReEister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P57 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum Ap 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 18.75 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODARTBOOKS 1,675.60 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 1 BRODART BOOKS 919.96 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 210.62 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 2883 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 295.03 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 11.10 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 1788 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 15.57 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS 46.41 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS 11.10 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS 38.85 Ap 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 249.10 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 179.46 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 10.07 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 8.95 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 13.26 Ap 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 14.50 Ap 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 14.56 Ap 00326063 2012/07/10 I BRODART BOOKS 60.99 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS 15.69 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 16.81 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 212.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 14.57 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 2129 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 63.53 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 Ap 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 26.52 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 15.57 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 30.99 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 11.10 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS 14.00 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 19.06 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P58 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 20.04 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 17.73 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BROL)ART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 17.73 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS -17.20 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 6.48 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS -6.48 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 51.72 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODARTBOOKS -~ -51.72 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 8.59 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS -8.59 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 f BRODART BOOKS -4.30 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 25.45 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS -25.45 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 8.60 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS -8.60 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS -4.30 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 17.20 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS -17.20 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 21.56 AP - 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 9.53 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.33 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.17 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.33 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.32 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 7L61 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 15.42 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.55 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.32 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 8.67 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 8.68 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.14 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.09 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.86 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.86 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORMA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 9.03 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 8.64 Ap 00326069 2012/07/10 1 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.93 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Dale; 07/] 1/: Time: 07:0 P59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.49 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 9.37 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 15.26 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.09 Ap 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.48 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 21.61 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 12.63 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNL4 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.84 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.84 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 7.12 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 7.13 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE ~ 1.79 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 I CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.56 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 1 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.98 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.79 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 10.84 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 7. ] 3 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 11.15 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 13.48 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.88 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.87 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 7.63 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 1 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 341.78 AP 00326067 2012/07/101 DEKRA-CITE INDUSTRIES INC 4,065.85 AP 00326066 2012/07/101 DAPPER TIRE CO -427.10 AP 00326066 2012/07/10 l DAPPER TIRE CO 826.76 AP 00326066 2012/07/101 DAPPER TIRE CO 1,642.12 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 I COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 COMP U ZONE 63.57 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( COMP U ZONE 170.00 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( COMP U ZONE 293.08 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 313.81 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 503.95 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS -817.76 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 542.37 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS -542.37 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 1,985.70 Ap 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODARTBOOKS -1,985.70 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 1,195.86 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS -1,195.86 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 30.20 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS -30.20 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P60 Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 19.38 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS -19.38 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS ~ 4.30 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS -4.30 Ap 00326064 2012/07/10 1 BRODART BOOKS 8.60 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS -8.60 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS 4.30 Ap 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS -4.30 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS -4.30 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 11.65 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 223.97 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 111.99 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 25.77 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS -25.77 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 8.60 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS -8.60 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS -4.30 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 6.48 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS ~ -6.48 AP 00326064 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS -21.56 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 I BRODART BOOKS 2592 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS -25.92 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 6.48 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS -6.48 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 8.59 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS -8.59 AP 00326064 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 17.20 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 15.57 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 100.50 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 33.15 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 831.42 Ap 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS 89.41 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 55.80 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 53.64 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P61 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 14.57 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 50.40 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 92.90 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 106.58 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 44.78 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 58.08 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 60.85 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 58.40 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 1 BRODART BOOKS 62.56 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 82.33 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 29.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 19.35 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 13.17 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS 217.02 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS 13.73 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODARTBOOKS 2,109.87 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 612.24 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 80.46 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 I BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 13.26 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP 00326063 20]2/07/101 BRODARTBOOKS 11.10 AP 00326063 2012/07/]0 f BRODART BOOKS 33.15 AP 00326063 20] 2/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 692.85 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 2,386.94 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 37.54 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 12.58 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 20.32 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 20.32 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.78 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.78 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.55 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.55 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.78 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 5.52 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 I CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 13.56 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 26.04 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 7.58 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.84 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.84 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 5.96 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P62 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00326069 2012/07/10 I CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 12.52 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 I CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.10 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 22.47 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 16.66 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.16 AP 00326069. 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.16 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 10.96 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 10.96 Ap 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.32 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 6.97 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORMA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 9.69 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.71 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 0.74 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 I CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.91 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.23 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.23 AP 00326069 2012/07/]0 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 58.13 AP 00326069 2012/07/101. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1,187.32 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.18 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.23 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.17 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.17 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 0.93 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 77.50 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 I CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 81.84 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.32 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.55 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.78 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE - 1.78 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.18 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.17 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 f CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.10 Ap 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.10 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 83.70 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 8.60 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 10.15 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 12.19 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 I CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.10 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 I CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.01 Ap 00326069 2012/07/10 1 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.00 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.05 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 I CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 8.29 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 I CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE ~ 4.21 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 5.15 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 7.36 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Curren[ Dale: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P63 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.33 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 2.87 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 0.77 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 15.50 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 12.55 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 I CALIFORMA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 13.32 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 20.47 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 1 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 12.47 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 16.66 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 21.92 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 54.07 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 5.04 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 5.03 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.43 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.95 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.95 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 0.87 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORMA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 0.86 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 5.90 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.61 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 0.81 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 13.27 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 f CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 15.94 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 11.21 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 27.75 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 8.18 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 11.61 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 5.22 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE . 2.51 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 0.77 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 55.88 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORMA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 22.43 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.01 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 I CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.00 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.12 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 341.78 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 7.64 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 l CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3.10 AP 00326069 2012/07/10 ( CALIFORMA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 1.14 AP 00326069. 2012/07/10 ( EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES SALES INC 17,506.55 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES SALES INC 868.06 AP 00326069 2012/07/101 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES SALES INC 473.15 AP 00326070 2012/07/101 EWINGIRR[GATIONPRODUCTS 1,152.06 AP 00326070 2012/07/101 EWINGIRRIGATIONPRODUCTS 1,152.06 AP 00326071 2012/07/10 ( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 944.26 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Dale: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P64 Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00326072 2012/07/10 l DAPPER TIRE CO -268.83 AP 00326072 2012/07/10 l DAPPER TIRE CO 268.83 AP 00326072 2012/07/101 DAPPER TIRE CO -326.73 AP 00326072 2012/07/10 l DAPPER TIRE CO 326.73 Ap 00326072 2012/07/101 DAPPER TIRE CO -469.80 AP 00326072 2012/07/10 ( DAPPER TIRE CO 469.80 AP 00326072 2012/07/101 DAPPER TIRE CO 326.73 AP 00326072 2012/07/10 ( DAPPER TIRE CO -326.73 AP 00326072 2012/07/101 DAPPER TIRE CO 469.80 AP 00326072 2012/07/10 ( DAPPER TIRE CO -469.80 AP 00326072 2012/07/101 GOLF VENTURES WEST 758.13 AP 00326072 2012/07/10 ( GOLF VENTURES WEST 410.70 pP 00326072 2012/07/101 GOLF VENTURES WEST 278.08 AP 00326072 2012/07/101 GOLF VENTURES WEST - 41.39 AP 00326073 2012/07/10 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 426.42 AP 00326073 2012/07/10 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 125.00 AP 00326073 2012/07/10 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 571.13 AP 00326073 2012/07/10 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC - ~ 125.00 AP 00326073 2012/07/10 l HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 654.29 AP 00326074 2012/07/101 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 36.17 AP 00325876 2012/07/03 1 D & D SERVICES INC. 400.00 AP 00325877 2012/07/03 1 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 257.53 AP 00325878 2012/07/031 DE LA RNA 33,898.00 AP 00325878 2012/07/03 1 DE LA RNA -1,695.00 pP 00325878 2012/07/03 1 DE LA RIVA 1,898.00 AP 00325878 2012/07/03 f DE LA RIVA -95.00 AP 00325879 2012/07/03 ( DEL MECHANICAL 365.00 AP 00325880 2012/07/031 DEMCOINC ~ 107.93 AP 00325882 2012/07/03 1 DOGRA, SUBHASH 47.00 AP 00325883 2012/07/03 1 DOUGLASS, ELIZABETH ~ 40.00 AP 00325884 2012/07/03 1 DOWNEY, JENNIFER 11.08 AP 00325885 2012/07/03 ( DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 195.00 AP 00325886 2012/07/031 ECOLAB FOOD SAFETY SPECIALTIES 125.67 AP 00325887 2012/07/03 t EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 558.15 AP 00325888 2012/07/03 ( ELLIOT, WALTER 560.24 AP 00325889 2012/07/03 l ELY, ROBERT 100.00 Ap 00325890 2012/07/03 ( ENGELKE, LINDA 12.00 AP 00325892 2012/07/03 1 ERGON ASPHALT AND EMULSIONS 177.99 AP 00325892 2012/07/03 l ERGON ASPHALT AND EMULSIONS 171.14 AP 00325893 2012/07/03 1 ESTELLA, SOLEMA 5.00 Ap 00325894 2012/07/03 1 FASTENAL COMPANY 9.65 AP 00325894 2012/07/03 l FASTENAL COMPANY 61.70 AP 00325895 2012/07/031 FEDERAL EXPRESSCORP 22.18 AP 00325895 2012/07/03 1 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 34.29 AP 00325899 2012/07/03 ( FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 546.78 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum P65 pP 00325899 2012/07/03 1 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 86. 09 AP 00325899 20] 2/07/03 1 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 316. 25 AP 00325900 2012/07/03 1 FOSTER, TERESA 100. 00 AP 00325901 2012/07/03 ( FRANCO, RICARDO 7 .00 AP 00325903 2012/07/03 ( PRISSY, DALE A 10,745 .28 pP 00325903. 2012/07/03 ( PRISSY, DALE A 3,931 .20 AP 00325904 2012/07/03 l GAIL MATERIALS 2,038 .83 AP 00325905 2012/07/03 1 GATEWAY PET CEMETARY AND CREMATORY 505 .00 AP 00325906 2012/07/03 1 GILLISON, JOHN 40 .00 AP 00325907 2012/07/03 1 GOMEZ, HUMBERTO 105 .00 AP 00325908 2012/07/03 1 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,000 .00 AP 00325908 2012/07/03 l GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 45 .00 pP 00325909 2012/07/03 ( GRAINGER 282 .52 AP 00325909 2012/07/03 ( GRAINGER 66 .01 AP 00325909 2012/07/03 ( GRAINGER 230 .41 AP 00325909 2012/07/03 ( GRAINGER -106 .68 AP 00325909 2012/07/03 ( GRAINGER 900 .00 AP 00325909 2012/07/031 GRAINGER 300 .00 AP 00325909 2012/07/031 GRAINGER 300 .00 AP 00325909 2012/07/031 GRAINGER 107 .63 AP 00325910 2012/07/03 1 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 48 .49 AP 00325910 2012/07/03 1 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 1,222 .96 AP 00325910 2012/07/03 l GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 50 .80 AP 00325910 2012/07/03 ( GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 113 .14 AP 00325910 2012/07/03 ( GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 37 .17 AP 00325910 2012/07/03 ( GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. - 38 .79 pP 00325910 2012/07/03 t GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 29 .09 AP 00325910 2012/07/03 1 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 199 .34 AP 00325910 2012/07/03 1 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 99 .67 qP 00325910 2012/07/03 1 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 99 .67 AP 00325911 2012/07/03 1 GUTIERREZ, ANITA 54 .00 AP 00325912 2012/07/03 1 HALO BRANDED SOLUTIONS 2,097 .34 Ap 00325913 2012/07/03 1 HANSEN, BARBARA 151 .99 AP 00325914 2012/07/03 1 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 408 .22 AP 00325914 2012/07/03 1 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 349 .45 AP 00325914 2012/07/03 ( HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 349 .45 AP 00325915 2012/07/03 l HOME & LAND LLC ~ 229 .66 AP 00325916 2012/07/03 ( HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 881 .40 AP 00325916 2012/07/03 1 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 998 .01 AP 00325917 2012/07/03 I HOSE MAN INC 99 .61 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 27 92 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -24 .31 A}' 00325920 2012/07/03 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 97 .31 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 21 .41 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 23 .57 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P66 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 45.45 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 117.47 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 38.01 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 213.84 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 6.98 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 523.22 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 245.52 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 131.84 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 0.79 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 30.11 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 7.55 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 52.84 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 155.38 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 t INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 176.14 Ap 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 68.79 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 248.22 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 22.33 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 39.49 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 16.14 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 94.26 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 94.21 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 124.82 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 51.89 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -51.89 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 24.35 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 206.32 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 206.32 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 8.65 Ap 00325920 2012/07/031 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 24.35 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 26.16 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 42.17 AP 00325920 2012/07/03 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 160.38 AP 00325921 2012/07/03 I INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 42.35 AP 00325921 2012/07/03 I INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 38.76 AP 00325923 2012/07/03 ( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES. 1,143.38 AP 00325924 2012/07/03 ( K K WOODWORKING 6887 pP 00325924 2012/07/03 ( K K WOODWORKING 34.44 AP 00325925 2012/07/03 ( KANE, JOHN 121.50 AP 00325926 2012/07/03 l KANG, BOMAE 250.00 Ap 00325927 2012/07/03 1 KAUR, CHARANJIT 81.00 AP 00325928 2012/07/03 1 KOLA 99.9 2,980.00 AP 00325929 2012/07/03 I KREPS, GREG 45.29 AP 00325930 2012/07/03 I LABARGE, KAITLYNN 12.00 AP 00325931 2012/07/03 I LEAL, RUTH 81.00 AP 00325933 2012/07/03 I LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 660.00 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Dale: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P67 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00325933 2012/07/03 l LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 66.00 AP 00325935 2012/07/03 f LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 1,580.00 AP 00325935 2012/07/03 ( LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 1,690.00 AP 00325936 2012/07/03 ( LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 232.63 AP 00325936 2012/07/03 ( LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER -72.02 AP 00325936 2012/07/03 l LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 72.30 AP 00325937 2012/07/03 1 LYN, FRED 35.00 AP 00325938 2012/07/03 1 MANAGEMENT PARTNERS INC 5,905.00 AP 00325939 2012/07/03 1 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,200.00 AP 00325939 2012/07/03 1 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,200.00 AP 00325939 2012/07/03 1 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,289.37 AP 00325939 2012/07/03 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,097.63 AP 00325939 2012/07/03 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,976.95 AP 00325939 2012/07/03 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,995.25 AP 00325939 2012/07/03 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,518.50 AP 00325940 2012/07/03 ( MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 50.95 AP 00325942 2012/07/03 l MARTINEZ, ANTHONY 94.00 AP 00325943 2012/07/03 ( MAYER, SUSAN & MICHAEL 22.80 AP 00325944 2012/07/031 MC TRUCKING 1,184.91 AP 00325945 2012/07/03 1 MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 48.27 Ap 00325946 2012/07/03 l MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 184.31 AP 00325947 2012/07/03 ( MCWELCO PRODUCTS 2,484.73 AP 00325948 2012/07/03 ( MELEI, LII,IENI 250.00 AP 00325949 20]2/07/03 ( MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIF 4,656.00 AP 00325950 2012/07/03 ( MIDWEST TAPE 34.99 AP 00325950 2012/07/03 ( MIDWEST TAPE 9.99 AP 00325950 2012/07/03 ( MIDWEST TAPE 12.99 AP 00325950 2012/07/03( MIDWEST TAPE 1299 AP 00325950 2012/07/03( MIDWEST TAPE 229.12 AP 00325950 2012/07/03( MIDWEST TAPE ~ ~ 229.11 AP 00325950 2012/07/031 MIDWEST TAPE 192.95 AP 00325950 2012/07/03 1 MIDWEST TAPE 39.99 AP 00325950 2012/07/03 l MIDWEST TAPE ~ ~ 63.98 AP~ 00325950 2012/07/03 ( MIDWEST TAPE 51.98 AP 00325950 2012/07/03 ( MIDWEST TAPE 103.72 AP 00325950 2012/07/03 ( MIDWEST TAPE 135.91 AP 00325950 2012/07/03( MIDWEST TAPE 12.79 AP 00325951 2012/07/03 1 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 60.00 AP 00325952 2012/07/03 1 MILANES, YIKCIA 187.50 AP 00325953 2012/07/03 1 MINUTEMAN PRESS 430.74 AP 00325954 2012/07/03 1 MISSION REPROGRAPHICS 65.94 AP 00325955 2012/07/03 1 MOE, JOHN 646.50 AP 00325956 2012/07/03 l MORRIS, DOUG 250.00 AP 00325957 2012/07/03 ( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 111.84 AP 00325957 2012/07/03 ( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 322.17 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 11 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P68 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325957 2012/07/03 1 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 182.20 AP 00325957 2012/07/03 l MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 79.78 AP 00325957 2012/07/03 1 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 342.27 AP 00325957 2012/07/03 1 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 748.63 AP 00325958 2012/07/03 1 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 348.04 AP 00325959 2012/07/03 1 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 184.55 AP 00325959 2012/07/03 1 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 800.91 Ap 00325959 2012/07/031 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 1,142.59 AP 00325959 2012/07/03 I MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 175.36 Ap 00325959 2012/07/031 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 1,278.51 AP 00325959 2012/07/03 l MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 18.30 AP 00325959' 2012/07/03 ( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 227.57 AP 00325959 2012/07/03 l MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 8.41 AP 00325959 2012/07/03 ( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 184.33 AP 00325959 2012/07/03 ( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 2,183.49 AP 00325960 2012/07/03 ( NAPA AUTO PARTS 686.45 AP 00325960 2012/07/03 l NAPA AUTO PARTS 27.21 AP 00325961 2012/07/03 t NATIONAL ROOFING CONSULTANTS INC 3,400.00 AP 00325962 2012/07/03 1 NOCHE, CARMELA 253.00 AP . 00325964 2012/07/03 1 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 37.12 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 1 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 8.60 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 11.68 Ap 00325964 2012/07/03 I O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 10.43 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 I O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 10.25 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 I O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 5.58 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 I O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 35.67 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 I O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 4.30 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 1 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 8.60 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 1 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 4.30 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 l O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 4.30 Ap 00325964 2012/07/03 (• O'REILI,Y AUTO PARTS 12.61 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 22.14 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 181.08 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS - ~ 7.38 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 1 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 12.90 Ap 00325964 2012/07/03 I O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 11.09 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 I O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 8.43 Ap 00325964 2012/07/03 I O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 6.70 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 I O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 33.52 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 8.60 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 15.07 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 6.78 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 14.87 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 7.38 Ap 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 11.96 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Dale: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P69 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325964 2012/07/03 l O'REII.LY AUTO PARTS 6.78 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 7.38 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REII,LY AUTO PARTS 20.12 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 42.74 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REII.LY AUTO PARTS 20.85 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REII.LY AUTO PARTS 12.90 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REII,LY AUTO PARTS 12.07 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 11.55 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 17.04 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 21.50 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 42.17 AP 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 4.30 Ap 00325964 2012/07/03 ( O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 14.02 AP 00325965 2012/07/03 ( OFFICE DEPOT 3,722.01 AP 00325965 2012/07/03 ( OFFICE DEPOT -5.24 AP 00325965 2012/07/03 ( OFFICE DEPOT 1,642.11 AP 00325966 2012/07/03 ( ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 453.60 AP 00325967 2012/07/031 OPARC 396.00 AP 00325968 2012/07/03 1 OSHEL, DARLENE 58.00 AP 00325969 2012/07/03 l PALOMINO, MARIELLA 250.00 AP 00325970 2012/07/03 ( PANGO, MARIA THERESA 47.00 AP 00325971 2012/07/03 ( PATHFINDER CONSULTING 2,682.50 AP 00325973 2012/07/03 ( PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 344.06 AP 00325973 2012/07/03 ( PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 226.35 AP 00325973 2012/07/03 ( PETES ROAD SERVICE INC ~ 2,560.86 AP 00325974 2012/07/03 f PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,030.03 AP 00325975 2012/07/03 l POMONA VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 15,933.38 AP 00325976 2012/07/03 1 POSTER SOLUTIONS ~ 70.00 AP 00325976 2012/07/03 1 POSTER SOLUTIONS 23.72 AP 00325977 2012/07/03 l PRADQ MYLEEN 47.00 AP 00325978 2012/07/03 1 PRO SALES GROUP INC 14.55 AP 00325979 2012/07/03 ( PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 1,337.61 AP 00325979 2012/07/03 f PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 4,023.61 AP 00325980 2012/07/03 ( PSA PRINTING AND MAILING SERVICES INC 107.97 AP 00325980 2012/07/03 ( PSA PRINTING AND MAILING SERVICES INC 107.96 AP 00325980 2012/07/03 ( PSA PRINTING AND MAILING SERVICES INC 343.94 AP 00325981 2012/07/03 ( QUINLAN, JAMI 60.00 AP 00325982 2012/07/03 ( RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 228.88 AP 00325983 2012/07/03 l RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 119.82 AP 00325984 2012/07/03 1 REPUBLIC ITS 595.20 AP 00325984 2012/07/03 1 REPUBLIC ITS 319.14 AP 00325985 2012/07/03 1 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,267.00 AP 00325985 2012/07/03 1 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 5,110.40 AP 00325985 2012/07/03 1 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 14,181.48 AP 00325985 2012/07/03 1 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 29,598.07 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 13 Current Date: 07/11/: Report. CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P70 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount Ap 00325986 2012/07/03 ( RIGEL PRODUCTS AND SERVICE 301.70 AP 00325987 2012/07/03 1 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 1,225.23 AP 00325988 2012/07/03 1 ROBERTS, ALLISON ~ 120.00 AP 00325989 2012/07/03 1 RODRIGUEZ, SARAH 25.00 AP 00325990 2012/07/03 I RYLAND HOMES OF CALIFORNIA 113.63 AP 00325991 2012/07/03 I SAFE DESIGNS INC 261.34 AP 00325992 2012/07/03 ( SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 387.00 AP 00325992 2012/07/03 ( SAN BERNARDBQO CO AUDITOR CONT 387.00 AP 00325992 2012/07/03 l SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 516.00 AP 00325992 2012/07/03 ( SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 774.00 AP 00325992 2012/07/03 ( SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 387.00 AP 00325992 2012/07/03 ( SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 768.00 AP 00325992 2012/07/03 ( SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 790.00 AP 00325993 2012/07/03 ( SCOTT, APRIL 121.50 AP 00325994 2012/07/03 ( SHEAKLEY 197.80 AP 00325994 2012/07/03 ( SHEAKLEY 37.50 AP 00325994 2012/07/031 SHEAKLEY 110.00 AP 00325994 2012/07/031 SHEAKLEY 16.25 AP 00325994 2012/07/031 SHEAKLEY 12.00 AP 00325995 2012/07/031 SIGMANET 1,131.51 AP 00325995 2012/07/03 I SIGMANET ] 1,859.80 AP 00325995 2012/07/031 SIGMANET ~ 1,131.52 AP 00325995 2012/07/03 ( SIGMANET ],131.51 AP 00325996 2012/07/03 ( SIGN SHOP, THE 153.10 Ap 00325997 2012/07/03 ( SIR SPEEDY ~ 146.54 AP 00325998 2012/07/03 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 32.84 AP 00325999 2012/07/03 l SOUTH COAST AQMD 113.88 AP 00325999 2012/07/03 ( SOUTH COAST AQMD 113.88 AP 00325999 2012/07/03 l SOUTH COAST AQMD ~ ~ 113.88 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,649.96 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.61 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.42 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.44 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.49 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.61 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.49 Ap 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.17 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.42 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.61 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.74 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.61 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.97 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.55 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 24.42 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.61 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 14 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 15 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout P71 Amoum 27.66 24.55 24.61 17.26 24.42 28.91 24.94 27.49 28.92 74.26 87.24 87.12 24.50 24.62 24.62 107.49 101.99 79.25 113.46 22.83 22.83 23.01 22.63 24.62 43.79 24.62 33.27 72.98 61.60 78.58 24.50 24.62 42.47 71.78 97.76 74.95 84.77 61.02 24.62 21.91 23.21 215.65 24.36 33.72 33.71 Current Date: 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P72 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 201.96 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.81 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.23 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.75 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.88 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.52 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.86 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.58 pp 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.18 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.30 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 360.34 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.46 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.49 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.58 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.95 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.70 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.82 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.59 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.36 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALffORNIA EDISON 143.33 Ap 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.24 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.95 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.65 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.73 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.29 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.81 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.14 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.20 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.00 AP 00326003 20]2/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.83 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.07 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 163.19 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.75 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.07 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.81 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.49 Ap 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.36 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.87 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.52 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.14 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.92 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.46 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.05 AP 00326003 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.29 AP 00326004 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,099.61 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 16 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re¢ister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name AP 00326005 2012/07/03 ( SPOONFACTORY AP 00326005 2012/07/03 ( SPOONFACTORY AP 00326005 2012/07/03 ( SPOONFACTORY AP 00326005 2012/07/03 ( SPOONFACTORY AP 00326006 2012/07/03 ( STEEVE, WII.MA AP 00326006 2012/07/03 ( STEEVE, WILMA AP 00326007 2012/07/03 ( STEUER, MARK A AP 00326009 2012/07/031 TAYLOR, TRACY AP 00326011 2012/07/03 I TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL AP 00326011 2012/07/03 1 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL AP 00326012 2012/07/03 1 THOMPSON BUILDING MATERIALS AP 00326013 2012/07/03 1 TOMARK SPORTS INC AP 00326014 2012/07/03 1 TOOMOTH, DR MICHELE PERSON AP 00326014 2012/07/03 1 TOOMOTH, DR MICHELE PERSON AP 00326015 2012/07/031 UNIFIRSTUNIFORMSERVICE AP 00326015 2012/07/03 1 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE AP 00326015 2012/07/03 1 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE AP 00326016 2012/07/03 ( UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC AP 00326017 2012/07/03 ( UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC AP 00326018 2012/07/03 ( UPS AP 00326018 2012/07/03( UPS AP 00326018 2012/07/03( UPS AP 00326019 2012/07/03 ( VASTA, WILLIAM AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326089 2012/07/10 l DANCE DYNAMICS AP 00326088 2012/07/10 ( WELSH, AKEMI Ap 00326021 2012/07/031 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00326021 2012/07/03 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA P73 Amoum 490.00 1,050.00 210.00 665.00 105.54 8.00 585.00 69.00 50.00 25.00 238.34 108.66 10.00 75.00 48.58 597.88 110.98 8,740.00 168.12 42.88 46.78 29.10 269.38 84.78 43.60 210.49 10,939.00 2,000.00 475.70 475.70 4.98 18.14 38.59 18.14 38.59 35.81 35.81 1.23 149.60 37.42 18.65 35.81 20.24 18.14 18.14 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 17 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Curren[ Date: 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P74 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA .125.21 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA ~ 38.59 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.14 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.14 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.42 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.14 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 390.14 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.59 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.14 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 6.06 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 4.98 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.89 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 504.87 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 77.18 AP 00326021 2012/07/03 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 58.87 AP 00326022 2012/07/03 1 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 125.36 AP 00326022 2012/07/03 l VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 50.03 AP 00326022 2012/07/03 l VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 130.84 AP 00326023 2012/07/03 ( VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00326023 2012/07/03 ( VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00326023 2012/07/03 ( VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00326023 2012/07/03 1 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00326023 2012/07/03 I VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00326023 2012/07/03 I VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00326023 20]2/07/031 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00326023 2012/07/03 I VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00326023 2012/07/03 1 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00326023 2012/07/03 1 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00326023 2012/07/03 1 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP 00326023 2012/07/03 I VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL ~ 25.00 AP 00326024 2012/07/03 I VIRAMONTEZ, LUPE 3,000.00 AP 00326025 2012/07/03 I VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 AP 00326026 2012/07/03 l WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 69.66 AP 00326026 2012/07/03 l WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 257.42 AP 00326027 2012/07/03 l WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,059.05 AP 00326027 2012/07/03 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,086.30 AP 00326027 2012/07/03 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 960.05 AP 00326028 2012/07/03 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 636.80 AP 00326028 2012/07/03 l WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 30.13 AP 00326028 2012/07/03 I WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 505.89 AP 00326029 2012/07/03 I WEST PAYMENT CENTER 343.47 AP 00326030 2012/07/03 I WESTCOAST MEDIA 900.50 AP 00326031 2012/07/03 1 WILCOVE, JENNIFER 540.00 AP 00326032 2012/07/03 1 WILLIAMS, KARMEN 5.00 AP 00326033 2012/07/03 1 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 145.00 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: l8 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 P75 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00326033 2012/07/03 ( WORD MILL PUBLISHING 145.00 AP 00326033 2012/07/03 ( WORD MILL PUBLISHING 145.00 AP 00326033 2012/07/03 ( WORD MILL PUBLISHING 145.00 AP ~ 00326033 2012/07/03 ( WORD MILL PUBLISHING 145.00 AP 00326034 2012/07/03 ( WUMBUS CORPORATION 1,091.58 AP ~ 00326035 2012/07/03 1 XTREME DETAILING 450.00 AP 00326036 2012/07/03 I ZEE MEDICAL INC 485.97 AP 00326037 2012/07/03 ( ZFX INC 1,308.90 pP 00326038 2012/07/03 l ZORDILLA, GLADYS 20.00 AP 00325626 2012/06/27 ( CONTACT SECURITY INC 10,911.60 AP 00325627 2012/06/27 ( CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPA 79.40 AP 00325627 2012/06/27 l CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPA 16.39 AP 00325628 2012/06/27 ( COOPER, CHERYL 90.00 AP 00325629 2012/06/27 l COPELAND, KEN 99.00 AP 00325631 2012/06/27 ( COPPER CANYON BAND 400.00 AP 00325633 2012/06/27 ( CPRS DISTRICT XI 73.01 AP 00325634 2012/06/27 ( D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 416.46 AP 00325636 2012/06/27 ( DANCE TERRIFIC 1,573.00 AP 00325643 2012/06/27 l DOLLARHIDE, GINGER 72.00 pP 00325642 2012/06/27 l DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 7,238.17 AP 00325641 2012/06/27 ( DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2,596.00 AP 00325641 2012/06/271 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 864.00 AP 00325639 2012/06/271 DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 2,925.00 AP 00325639 2012/06/27 l DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 4,950.00 AP 00325638 2012/06/27 ( DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC. 450.00 AP 00325638 2012/06/27 l DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC. 400.00 AP 00325636 2012/06/27 ( DANCE TERRIFIC 152.10 AP 00325650 2012/06/27 ( EASTERLING, RAY 19.20 AP 00325650 2012/06/27 ( EASTERLING, RAY 67.20 AP 00325650 2012/06/27 ( EASTERLING, RAY 144.00 AP 00325649 2012/06/27 l EARLEY, IDA 165.60 AP 00325648 2012/06/27 ( DUNN, ANN MARIE 252.00 AP 00325648 2012/06/27 ( DUNN, ANN MARIE 1,317.60 AP 00325648 2012/06/27 ( DUNK, ANN MARIE 144.00 AP 00325648 2012/06/27 ( DUNN, ANN MARIE 81.00 AP 00325648 2012/06/271 DUNN, ANN MARIE 198.00 Ap 00325662 2012/06/271 GAIL MATERIALS 3,206.64 Ap 00325662 2012/06/27 ( GAIL MATERIALS 1,459.14 AP 00325662 2012/06/27 l GAIL MATERIALS 670.02 AP 00325662 2012/06/27 1 GAIL MATERIALS 2,038.83 Ap 00325661 2012/06/27 l FONTANA POLICE DEPARTMENT 3,877.50 AP 00325660 2012/06/27 ( FLICKINGER, GLORIA 84.00 AP 00325658 2012/06/27 ( FISHER SCIENTIFIC 286.66 AP 00325658 2012/06/27 l FISHER SCIENTIFIC 143.26 pP 00325657 2012/06/27 ( FELICIANQ ANTHONY 420.00 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 19 Current Date: 07/11/: Repor[ CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P76 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325669 2012/06/27 ( HAMILTON, MONIQUE 200.00 AP 00325669 2012/06/27 ( HAMILTON, MONIQUE 170.00 AP 00325669 2012/06/27 ( HAMILTON, MONIQUE 30.00 AP 00325668 2012/06/271 HADDON, SCOTT 15,633.42 AP 00325667 2012/06/271 HAAKER EQU[PMENT CO 130.50 AP ~ 00325666 2012/06/27 t GRAINGER 411.69 AP 00325666 2012/06/271 GRAINGER 453.06 AP 00325666 2012/06/271 GRAINGER 205.85 AP 00325666 2012/06/27 ( GRAINGER 75.91 AP 00325681 2012/06/27 l IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 659.77 AP 00325680 2012/06/27 ( WEHRLE, IKBAL 82.00 AP 00325679 2012/06/27 ( IDEAL GLASS TINTING 156.00 AP 00325678 2012/06/27 ( HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALITIES INC 174.56 AP 00325677 2012/06/27 ( HSU, STEVE 624.00 AP 00325676 2012/06/27 ( HOUSE OF RUTH 383.42 AP 00325675 2012/06/27 ( HOSE MAN INC 400.54 AP 00325675 2012/06/27 ( HOSE MAN INC 66.76 AP 00325675 2012/06/27 ( HOSE MAN INC 245.98 AP 00325682 2012/06/271 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 7.47 AP 00325682 2012/061271 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 2.31 AP 00325682 2012/06/271 INDEPENDENTC STATIONERS 25.75 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 10.38 AP 00325682 2012/06/271 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 61.53 Ap 00325682 2012/06/271 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 687.08 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 276.88 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 220.28 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 819.17 AP 00325684 2012/06/27 f INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 1,664.45 AP 00325683 2012/06/27 I INDERWIESCHE, MATT 1,749.00 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 255.40 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -5.06 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -5.06 Ap 00325682 2012/06/27 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -0.82 AP 00325682 2012/06/271 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 2.32 AP 00325682 2012/06/271 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 2.33 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 27.35 Ap 00325729 2012/06/271 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 160.00 AP 00325729 2012/06/27 I PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 153.00 AP 00325728 2012/06/27 I PIONEER MANUFACTURING 2,262.04 AP 00325728 2012/06/27 1 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 1,319.94 AP 00325727 2012/06/27 ( PINKERTON, FRANK 200.00 AP 00325726 2012/06/27 ( PETES ROAD SERVICE INC ~ 440.59 AP 00325725 2012/06/27 ( PEREZ, DOMINICK 2,000.00 AP 00325724 2012/06/27 ( PEP BOYS 5.92 AP 00325723 2012/06/271 PARS 3,500.00 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 20 Current Date: 07/1 ]/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name AP 00325722 2012/06/27 ( PAL CAMPAIGN AP 00325721 2012/06/27 ( PAHIA, REGINALD AP 00325720 2012/06/27 ( OTT, SHARON AP 00325720 2012/06/27 l OTT, SHARON AP 00325720 2012/06/271 OTT, SHARON AP 00325719 2012/06/271 OTT, LAURA AP 00325719 2012/06/27 1 OTT, LAURA AP 00325718 20]2/06/271 ORONA,PATRICIA AP 00325718 2012/06/271 ORONA, PATRICIA AP 00325717 2012/06/27 l ORKIN PEST CONTROL AP 00325717 2012/06/27 l ORKIN PEST CONTROL AP 00325716 2012/06/27 ( WALLS, OLIVIA AP 00325715 2012/06/27 ( OCEAN SYSTEMS AP 00325714 2012/06/27 ( NITHYA, SARVASMARANA AP 00325714 2012/06/27 ( NITHYA, SARVASMARANA AP 00325714 2012/06/27 ( NITHYA, SARVASMARANA Ap 00325714 2012/06/27 ( NITHYA, SARVASMARANA AP 00325712 2012/06/271 NEW DIMENSIONS AP 0032571 I 2012/06/271 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP 00325711 2012/06/27 1 NAPA AUTO PARTS Ap 00325711 2012/06/27 1 NAPA AUTO PARTS Ap 00325711 2012/06/271 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP 00325711 2012/06/27 l NAPA AUTO PARTS AP 00325711 2012/06/27 ( NAPA AUTO PARTS AP 00325710 2012/06/27 ( N-2 FITNESS AP 00325709 2012/06/27 ( MYERCHIN, NICOLE AP 00325708 2012/06/27 ( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR AP 00325708 2012/06/27 ( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR AP 00325707 2012/06/27 (- MOMS CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-WEST AP 00325706 2012/06/27 ( MIR, SHAZIA AP 00325705 2012/06/27( MIDWEST TAPE AP 00325704 2012/06/27 ( MIDDLE RIDGE INC AP 00325703 2012/06/271 MAUK, MELISSA AP 00325703 2012/06/27 I MAUK, MELISSA AP 00325702 2012/06/271 MARSHALL, SYLVTA pP 00325701 2012/06/27 l MARK CHRISTOPHER INC pP 00325701 2012/06/27 ( MARK CHRISTOPHER INC AP 00325700 2012/06/27 f MAIN STREET SIGNS AP 00325700 2012/06/27 ( MAIN STREET SIGNS AP 00325699 2012/06/27 ( MAD SCIENCE AP 00325698 2012/06/27 ( KONE INC AP 00325697 2012/06/27 ( KIM, DANIEL AP 00325697 2012/06/27 ( KIM, DANIEL AP 00325697 2012/06/27 l KIM, DANIEL AP 00325696 2012/06/271 KIDSART, KIDSART P77 Amoum 50.00 57.60 120.00 165.00 270.00 210.00 492.00 320.00 1,280.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 1,295.00 180.00 216.00 324.00 300.00 132.50 100.83 39.78 11.67 415.96 164.83 47.39 583.20 1,044.90 78.82 89.83 500.00 82.00 39.99 700.00 288.00 168.00 749.40 553.16 1,467.06 161.63 310.32 2,916.00 568.60 31.00 63.00 222.50 372.40 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 21 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date; 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P78 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325696 2012/06/271 KIDSART, KIDSART 558.60 AP 00325696 2012/06/27 ( KIDSART, KIDSART 319.20 AP 00325695 2012/06/27 f K K WOODWORKING 17.22 AP 00325695 2012/06/27 ( K K WOODWORKING 34.44 AP 00325694 2012/06/27 ( JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,421.00 AP 00325694 2012/06/27 ( JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 300.50 AP 00325694 2012/06/27 ( JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 62.00 AP 00325694 2012/06/27 ( JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 7,351.50 AP 00325693 2012/06/27 ( JOHNSON, TANISHA 336.00 AP 00325692 2012/06/27 ( JOHNSON, JENNY 52.50 AP 00325692 2012/06/27 ( JOHNSON, JENNY 90.00 AP 00325691 2012/06/27 ( JOHNSON LIFT HYSTER 121.59 AP 00325691 2012/06/27 ( JOHNSON LIFT HYSTER 359.68 AP 00325690 2012/06/27 l JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 335.08 AP 00325689 2012/06/271 JACKSON HIRSH INC 98.58 AP 00325688 2012/06/271 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 100.17 AP 00325686 2012/06/27 ( INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE INC 930.83 AP 00325686 2012/06/27 l INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE INC 219.38 AP 00325686 2012/06/27 ( INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE INC 164.14 AP 00325732 2012/06/27 ( PRECISION GYMNASTICS 3,446.80 AP 00325731 2012/06/27 ( PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 11.40 AP 00325730 2012/06/27 ( PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 143.46 AP 00325686 2012/06/27 ( INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE INC 555.89 AP 00325685 2012/06/27 ( INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 2,355.71 AP 00325685 2012/06/27 ( INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 602.16 AP 00325685 2012/06/27 ( INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 112.50 AP 00325685 2012/06/27 ( INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 75.00 AP 00325685 2012/06/27 ( INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 37.50 AP 00325685 2012/06/27 l INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 2,205.44 AP 00325685 2012/06/27 ( INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 275.68 AP 00325682 2012/06/271 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -L09 AP 00325682 2012/06/271 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -12.17 AP 00325682 2012/06/271 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -4.90 AP 00325682 2012/06/271 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 2.62 AP 00325682 2012/06/271 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 29.22 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 11.77 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 1.66 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS _18.55 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 0.90 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 2.50 AP 00325682 2012/06/271 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 2.50 AP 00325682 2012/06/271 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 28.07 AP 00325682 2012/06/27 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 64.21 AP 00325681 2012/06/271 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 123.00 AP 00325681 2012/06/271 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 21.77 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 22 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P79 Au_enda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name ~ Amoum AP 00325681 2012/06/271 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 1,161.94 AP 00325674 2012/06/271 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 53.29 AP 00325674 2012/06/271 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 59.05 AP 00325673 20]2/06/27( HII.TIINC 133.65 AP 00325672 2012/06/27 ( HI WAY SAFETY INC 620.64 AP 00325672 2012/06/27 ( HI WAY SAFETY INC -386.61 AP 00325671 2012/06/27 ( HEILIG, KELLY 724.50 AP 00325670 2012/06/27 ( HARBOUR, CAROL 964.00 AP 00325669 2012/06/27 ( HAMILTON, MONIQUE 144.00 AP 00325666 2012/06/27 ( GRAINGER 80.70 AP 00325666 2012/06/27 ( GRAINGER 28.33 AP 00325666 2012/06/27 ( GRAINGER 358.53 AP 00325666 2012/06/27 ( GRAINGER 73.56 AP 00325665 2012/06/27 ( GODINEZ, ALFONSO 100.00 AP 00325664 2012/06/27 ( GIORDANO, MARIANNA 76.80 AP 00325664 2012/06/271 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 39.00 AP 00325663 2012/06/271 GARCIA, VICTORIA 21.30 AP 00325656 2012/06/271 FASTENAL COMPANY 16.49 AP 00325655 2012/06/27 I EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 57.51 AP 00325655 2012/06/27 I EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 30.32 AP 00325655 2012/06/27 ( EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 234.14 AP 00325653 2012/06/27 ( EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 505.13 AP 00325653 2012/06/27 ( EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 285.97 AP 00325652 2012/06/27 ( ECOLAB INC. 143.14 AP 00325651 2012/06/27 ( EBSCO 4.40 AP 00325648 2012/06/27 ( DUNN, ANN MARIE 90.00 AP 00325648 2012/06/27 ( DUNN, ANN MARIE 144.00 AP 00325647 2012/06/27 ( DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 193.10 AP 00325646 2012/06/27 ( DUFFY, RICK 1,835.75 AP 00325645 2012/06/27 ( DREAM SHAPERS 475.00 _ AP 00325644 2012/06/27 l DREAM SHAPERS 475.00 AP 00325643 2012/06/271 DOLLARHIDE, GINGER 40.00 AP 00325643 2012/06/271 DOLLARHIDE, GINGER 24.00 AP 00325635 2012/06/271 DAGHDEVHtIAN, KATHY 369.00 AP 00325634 2012/06/271 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 537.08 AP 00325632 2012/06/27 l CPRS DISTRICT 11 713.35 AP 00325630 2012/06/271 COPIES & INK PRIlVTING INC. 818.46 AP 00325628 2012/06/27 ( COOPER, CHERYL 34.00 AP 00325628 2012/06/27 ( COOPER, CHERYL 302.40 AP 00325733 2012/06/27( -PRO SPRAY EQUIPMENT 129.46 Ap 00325734 2012/06/27 ( PROSHOT PRODUCTS 14.69 AP 00325735 2012/06/27 ( RAMIREZ, VERONICA 147.00 AP 00325736 2012/06/27 ( RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES 2,216.00 AP 00325736 2012/06/27 l RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES 306.00 AP 00325736 2012/06/27 l RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES 1,000.00 User:VLOPEZ-VERONICALOPEZ Page: 23 Current Date; 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Reeister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P80 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name - Amours AP 00325737 2012/06/27 I RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 218.18 AP 00325737 2012/06/27 ( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 2.96 AP 00325737 2012/06/27 ( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 1,236.11 AP 00325738 2012/06/271 RCPFA 9,315.70 AP 00325739 2012/06/271 RED WING SHOE STORE 171.27 AP 00325740 2012/06/271 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,451.09 AP 00325741 2012/06/27 I RICHARDSON, ANGELA 42.00 AP 00325742 - 2012/06/27 I ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 491.66 AP 00325743 2012/06/27 I ROBLES, RAUL P 75.00 AP 00325744 2012/06/27 I ROTARY CORPORATION 136.46 AP 00325745 2012/06/27 ( SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 222.43 AP 00325746 2012/06/27 l SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 192.00 AP 00325747 2012/06/27 ( SAN BERNARDINO CTY 9,734.90 AP 00325748 2012/06/27 I SAN BERNARDINO CTY DEPT OF PUBLIC WORK 54.61 AP 00325749 2012/06/27( SBPEA 729.17 AP 00325750 2012/06/27 ( SC FUELS 3,167.68 AP 00325750 2012/06/271 SC FUELS 15,348.69 AP 00325750 2012/06/27[ SC FUELS 14,168.02 AP 00325750 2012/06/271 SC FUELS 13,815.50 AP 00325750 2012/06/27 I SC FUELS 12,752.78 Ap 00325751 2012/06/27 l SCOTT, MICHAEL 97.68 AP 00325752 2012/06/27 f SEGURA, ANTOINETTE 51.00 AP 00325753 2012/06/27 I SENECHAL, CALVIN 136.80 AP 00325753 2012/06/27 t SENECHAL, CALVIN 122.40 AP 00325753 2012/06/27 ( SENECHAL, CALVIN 63.00 AP 00325753 2012/06/27 ( SENECHAL, CALVIN 45.00 AP 00325753 2012/06/27 ( SENECHAL, CALVIN 18.00 AP 00325753 ~ 2012/06/27 1 SENECHAL, CALVIN 111.00 AP 00325753 2012/06/271 SENECHAL, CALVIN 78.60 AP 00325753 2012/06/271 SENECHAL, CALVIN 140.40 AP 00325753 2012/06/27 I SENECHAL, CALVIN 118.80 AP 00325753 2012/06/27 I SENECHAL, CALVIN 43.20 AP 00325753 2012/06/27 I SENECHAL, CALVIN 108.00 AP 00325754 2012/06/27 ( SGV NAT'L COUNCIL OF NEGRO WOMEN 72.50 AP 00325755 2012/06/27 ( SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 71.86 AP 00325756 2012/06/27 I SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 397.34 Ap 00325757 2012/06/27 ( SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 AP 00325758 2012/06/27 l SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 18.70 AP 00325759 2012/06/27 l SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 255.00 AP 00325760 2012/06/27 1 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 186.79 AP 00325761 2012/06/27 l SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 30.51 AP 00325762 2012/06/27 l SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 25.00 AP 00325763 2012/06/27 I SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 AP 00325764 2012/06/27 t SHERROD FAMILY REUNION - 773.32 AP 00325765 2012/06/27 ( SHRED IT 36.52 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 24 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P81 Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325765 2012/06/271 SHRED IT 18.26 AP 00325765 2012/06/271 SHRED IT 18.26 AP 00325765 2012/06/271 SHRED IT 18.26 AP 00325766 2012/06/271 SHU JAN, WEI 135.00 AP 00325767 2012/06/271 SIGN SHOP, THE 80.81 AP 00325768 2012/06/27 l SILVER, EDNA 390.00 AP 00325768 2012/06/27 f SILVER, EDNA 390.00 AP 00325770 2012/06/27 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5.26 AP 00325770 2012/06/27 l SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 33.13 AP 00325770 2012/06/271 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 100.19 AP 00325770 2012/06/271 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 102.50 AP 00325770 2012/06/271 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 420.53 AP 00325770 2012/06/271 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 586.84 AP 00325770 2012/06/271 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,269.02 AP 00325770 2012/06/271 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,140.60 AP 00325770 2012/06/271 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 645.89 AP 00325770 2012/06/27 l SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 14.79 AP 00325770 2012/06/27 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 6.17 AP 00325770 2012/06/27 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 56.19 Ap 00325770 2012/06/27 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,097.18 AP 00325771 2012/06/27 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,011.04 AP 00325772 2012/06/27 ( SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY INC 712.80 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.09 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.55 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.09 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.31 pP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 136.41 AP 00325779 20]2/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.95 Ap 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 Ap 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.11 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 Ap 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.17 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.38 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.46 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.35 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.36 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.17 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.29 pP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.29 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 25 Curren[ Date: 07/1 I/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P82 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.02 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.64 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.26 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.29 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.52 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.80 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 28.15 pP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 Ap 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.29 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.23 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.04 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.98 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.09 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.09 AP' 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - 22.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.09 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.67 qP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.18 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.69 qP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.29 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.78 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.18 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.16 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CAL~ORNIA EDISON 179.20 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.23 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.73 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.65 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.05 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 152.05 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 qP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.71 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.31 Ap 00325779 2012/06/27 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.98 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 26 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register PortraibLayout Time: 07:0 CITY.OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P83 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.55 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.04 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.10 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 ~ 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ - 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.89 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.26 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.20 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.41 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.72 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.83 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 Ap 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 Ap 00325779 2012/06/27 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.90 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.08 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 Ap 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.95 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.52 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.43 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.52 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 Ap 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.09 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 Ap 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.45 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.74 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 281.32 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - 23.29 Ap 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.31 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.63 Ap 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.76 Ap 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.89 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 27 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AEenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P84 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.53 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.65 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 210.20 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.06 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.85 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.95 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.98 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.62 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.17 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.09 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.39 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.24 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.95 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.95 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.35 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 23.52 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.94 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.65 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.25 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.95 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.95 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.39 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.38 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.81 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.81 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.95 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 61.91 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.51 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.27 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.93 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.80 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 28 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P85 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.95 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.88 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,605.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.97 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.95 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.13 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.82 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 144.74 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - 23.29 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.51 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.29 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.81 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 23.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 247.02 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.58 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 165.68 AP 00325779 2012/061271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.84 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.01 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.71 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.77 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.10 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.30 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.11 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.78 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 326.71 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.50 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.96 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.55 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALffORNIA EDISON 229.43 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 212.86 AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.15 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.65 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.38 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALffORNIA EDISON 22.50 AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.52 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 29 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/27 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Ap 00325779 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/27 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/27 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325779 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325780 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325780 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325781 2012/06/271 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP 00325782 2012/06/27 ( SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS AP 00325783 2012/06/27 l STOFA, JOSEPH AP 00325784 2012/06/27 ( SUMARLI, LYDIA AP 00325785 2012/06/27 ( SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC AP 00325786 2012/06/27 1 SUNRISE FORD AP 00325786 2012/06/271 SUNRISE FORD Ap 00325786 2012/06/27 I SUNRISE FORD AP 00325786 2012/06/27 I SUNRISE FORD AP 00325786 2012/06/271 SUNRISE FORD AP 00325786 2012/06/27 I SUNRISE FORD AP 00325787 2012/06/271 TALATI, ARNAVAZ AP 00325788 2012/06/271 TALENT PLANET AP 00325789 2012/06/27 l TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS AP 00326058 2012/07/101 ABC LOCKSMITHS AP 00325791 2012/06/271 TERRY, DONNA Ap 00325792 2012/06/27 ( WILLIAMS, TINA AP 00325794 2012/06/27 ( TOLL ROADS VIOLATIONS DEPT, THE AP 00325795 2012/06/27 ( TOOLS R US INC AP 00325796 2012/06/27 ( TOTAL STRUCTURES INC AP 00325797 2012/06/27 ( TRACEY, VAL AP 00325797 2012/06/27 ( TRACEY, VAL AP 00325797 2012/06/27 ( TRACEY, VAL AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 30 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout P86 Amoum 24.10 22.95 46.32 26.49 22.95 22.76 92.76 22.95 164.72 309.63 91.93 126.97 23.15 22.95 22.76 24.62 3.05 59.05 34.38 35.94 93.88 874.00 10.00 749.70 2,454.40 3,517.95 7,538.45 7,035.89 1,507.69 3,015.38 2,512.82 205.00 1,983.85 1,348.31 -63.55 235.20 500.00 60.50 173.67 21.48 442.80 388.80 388.80 24.13 38.20 Curren[ Date: 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P87 Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name - Amoum AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 28.56 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 9.53 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 15.69 AP 00326059 2012/07/10 l AUTO BODY 2000 3,215.30 AP 00326058 2012/07/101 ABC LOCKSMITHS 9.69 AP 00326058 2012/07/10 ( ABC LOCKSMITHS 26.40 AP 00326058 2012/07/101 ABC LOCKSMITHS 121.98 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 10.07 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 38.94 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 I BRODART BOOKS 16.81 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 l BRODART BOOKS 15.68 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 23.52 Ap 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 19.84 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 38.21 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 90.10 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 42.00 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 53.97 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 126.88 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 21.29 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 59.35 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 52.29 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 106.55 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 18.21 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 f BRODART BOOKS 51.31 AP 00326063 2012/07/10 ( BRODART BOOKS 22.73 AP 00326063 2012/07/101 BRODART BOOKS 22.26 AP 00326058 2012/07/10 ( ABC LOCKSMITHS 31.60 AP 00326058 2012/07/101 ABC LOCKSMITHS 38.79 AP 00326058 2012/07/10 ( ABC LOCKSMITHS 366.79 AP 00326058 2012/07/10 ( ABC LOCKSMITHS 16.16 AP 00326058 2012/07/10 t ABC LOCKSMITHS -16.16 AP 00326058 2012/07/10 ( ABC LOCKSMITHS 927.46 AP 00326058 2012/07/101 ABC LOCKSMITHS -927.46 AP 00326058 2012/07/101 ABC LOCKSMITHS 63.55 AP 00325797 2012/06/271 TRACEY, VAL 183.60 AP 00325798 2012/06/27 l UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 208.00 AP 00325798 2012/06/271 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 65.00 AP 00325799 -2012/06/271 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 35.62 AP 00325799 2012/06/271 UNIFIRSTUNIFORMSERVICE 109.88 AP 00325799 2012/06/27 ( UNIFHtST UNIFORM SERVICE 48.58 AP 00325799 2012/06/27 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 12.96 AP 00325799 2012/06/271 UNIFIRST UMFORM SERVICE 676.63 AP 00325799 2012/06/27 ( UNIFII2ST UNIFORM SERVICE 724.83 AP 00325799 2012/06/271 UNIFIItSTUNIFORMSERVICE ~ 151.97 AP 00325800 2012/06/27 l UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 644.58 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 31 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ap_enda Check ReEister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P88 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325801 2012/06/271 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 152.71 AP 00325802 2012/06/271 UNITED WAY 183.00 AP 00325802 2012/06/271 UNITED WAY 6.00 AP 00325803 2012/06/271 UPS 47.96 AP 00325803 2012/06/271 UPS 86.59 AP 00325804 2012/06/271 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINTENACE 13,515.76 AP 00325804 2012/06/271 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINTENACE 52,861.97 AP 00325804 2012/06/271 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINTENACE 10,616.94 AP 00325804 2012/06/271 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINTENACE 33.15 AP 00325804 2012/06/27 ( VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINTENACE 432.40 AP 00325804 2012/06/271 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINTENACE 342.44 AP 00325804 2012/06/27 l VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINTENACE 50.00 AP 00325805 2012/06/27 ( VASQUEZ CONSTRUCTION 3,993.00 AP 00325806 2012/06/27 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 79.38 AP 00325806 2012/06/27 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 584.72 AP 00325806 2012/06/27 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA ~ 115.79 AP 00325806 20]2/06/27 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 46.54 AP 00325806 2012/06/271 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 67.91 AP 00325806 2012/06/271 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.31 AP 00325806 2012/06/271 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 115.76 AP 00325806 2012/06/271 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.07 AP 00325806 2012/06/271 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.42 AP 00325806 2012/06/271 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 35.81 AP 00325806 2012/06/271 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.59 AP 00325806 2012/06/271 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.65 AP 00325806 2012/06/271 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.42 AP 00325806 2012/06/271 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.59 AP 00325806 2012/06/27 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 80.97 AP 00325806 2012/06/27 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 524.27 AP 00325806 2012/06/271 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.14 AP 00325806 2012/06/27 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.42 AP 00325806 2012/06/27 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.51 AP 00325806 2012/06/271 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 79.96 AP 00325807 2012/06/271 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 79.99 AP 00325809 2012/06/271 WALLACE, GARY 51.00 AP 00325810 2012/06/271 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 320.17 AP 00325810 2012/06/271 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 380.38 AP 00325810 2012/06/27 I WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 1,384.59 AP 00325810 2012/06/27 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 179.43 AP 00325811 2012/06/27 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 33.19 AP 00325811 2012/06/27 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 89.53 AP 00325811 2012/06/271 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 95.59 AP 00325812 2012/06/27 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 4,256.]3 AP 00325812 2012/06/27 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 656.33 AP 00325812 2012/06/27 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 439.62 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 32 Current Date; 07/11/: Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layou[ Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P89 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325812 2012/06/271 WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 75.43 AP 00325812 2012/06/271 WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 1,430.92 AP 00325813 2012/06/27 I WEST COAST CONCERT LIGHTING 150.00 AP 00325814 2012/06/271 WEST SANITATION SERVICES INC 361.95 AP 00325814 2012/06/271 WEST SANITATION SERVICES INC 370.10 AP 00325815 2012/06/271 WILD PACKETS 4,495.50 AP 00325815 2012/06/271 WII.D PACKETS 999.00 AP 00325816 2012/06/27 l WILSON AND BELL 80.00 qp 00325816 2012/06/27 ( WILSON AND BELL 685.27 AP 00325817 2012/06/27 ( XTREME DETAILING 675.00 AP 00325818 2012/06/27 ( ZAVALA, PETER 36.00 AP 00325819 2012/06/27 ( ZIRGES, ARLENE 195.00 AP 00325819 2012/06/27 ( ZIRGES, ARLENE 195.00 Ap 00325819 2012/06/27 ( ZIRGES, ARLENE ~ 180.00 AP 00325381 2012/06/20 ( CORNERSTONE RECORDS MANAGEMENT 761.67 AP 00325382 2012/06/20 ( D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 477.88 AP 00325382 2012/06/20 l D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 662.13 AP 00325382 2012/06/201 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 196.11 AP 00325383 2012/06/20 I DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 9,180.72 AP 00325384 2012/06/201 DEL MECHANICAL 317.50 AP 00325386 2012/06/201 DGO AUTO DETAILING 155.00 AP 00325388 2012/06/20 ( DURKEL, CAROL 86.58 AP 00325388 2012/06/20 ( DURKEL, CAROL 48.84 AP 00325392 2012/06/20 ( ELLIS ENTERPRISES 70.00 AP 00325391 2012/06/20 ( ELITE COMPANIES US INC ~ ~ -877.50 AP 00325391 2012/06/20 f ELITE COMPANIES US INC 17,550.00 AP 00325390 2012/06/20 ( EGAN, BARBARA 48.00 AP 00325389 2012/06/20 ( DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 262.64 AP 00325389 2012/06/20 ( DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 694.77 AP 00325389 2012/06/20 ( DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 381.60 AP 00325389 2012/06/20 ( DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 1,055.95 AP 00325389 2012/06/20 ( DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 478.84 AP 00325399 2012/06/20 ( FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 71.72 AP 00325399 2012/06/20 l FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 22.18 AP 00325399 2012/06/201 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 12.34 AP 00325398 2012/06/201 FASTENAL COMPANY 85.31 AP 00325398 2012/06/201 FASTENAL COMPANY 51.19 AP 00325396 2012/06/20 l EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 40.00 AP 00325395 2012/06/20 ( ENVBtONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC. 1,982.57 AP 00325394 2012/06/20 ( EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES SALES INC 3,993.06 AP 00325394 2012/06/20 ( EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES SALES INC 14,192.64 AP 00325414 2012/06/20 ( GOODWILL OF SOUTHERN CALIF 465.00 AP 00325413 2012/06/20 ( GOOD YEAR SOCCER LEAGUE 145.00 AP 00325412 2012/06/20 ( GeWEIFAL, HESHAM 104.00 AP 00325411 2012/06/201 GAIUS, JOY 8.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 33 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P90 Check No. ~ Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00325410 2012/06/20 l PRISSY, DALE A 3,931.20 AP 00325410 2012/06/20 ( PRISSY, DALE A - 10,745.28 AP 00325409 2012/06/201 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 37.94 AP 00325409 2012/06/20 1 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 82.56 AP 00325407 2012/06/201 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 1,191.93 AP 00325422 2012/06/20 ( HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 342.86 AP 00325421 2012/06/20 ( HILDEBRAND, LADELL 19.50 AP 00325420 2012/06/20 ( HDS WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 15.39 AP 00325419 2012/06/20 t HARTE-HANKS SHOPPERS INC. 1,294.17 AP 00325417 2012/06/20 ( GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 1,174.48 AP 00325417 2012/06/20 ( GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 1,020.39 AP 00325417 2012/06/20 ( GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 1,389.98 AP 00325417 2012/06/20 ( GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 533.36 AP 00325416 2012/06/20 ( GRAINGER 1.89 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 20.66 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 8.33 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 3.87 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 43.23 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 17.42 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -3.88 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -43.34 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -17.47 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 94.61 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 34.27 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 283.75 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 62.92 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 361.74 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 490.94 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 89.80 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 174.37 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 74.65 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 385.96 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS ~ 52.74 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 4.32 Ap 00325428 2012/06/20 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 48.25 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 19.45 Ap 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 88.37 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 88.37 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 24.31 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 74.09 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 6.09 AP 00325462 2012/06/201 NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION 155.41 AP 00325461 2012/06/201 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 500.00 AP 00325461 2012/06/20 f MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION ~ 626.12 Ap 00325460 2012/06/20 ( MOORE, LORI 120.00 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 34 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P91 Ap_enda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name ~ Amoum Ap 00325459 2012/06/201 MOE, JOHN 651.00 AP 00325458 2012/06/201 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA IN~ 579.04 AP 00325456 2012/06/201 MIDWEST TAPE 14.39 AP 00325456 2012/06/201 MIDWEST TAPE 12.99 AP 00325456 2012/06/201 MIDWEST TAPE 12.99 AP 00325456 2012/06/201 MIDWEST TAPE 289.47 AP 00325456 2012/06/201 MIDWEST TAPE 721.00 AP 00325456 2012/06/20 ( MIDWEST TAPE 9.99 AP 00325456 2012/06/20 t MIDWEST TAPE 32.37 AP 00325456 2012/06/201 MIDWEST TAPE 67.35 AP 00325456 2012/06/201 MIDWEST TAPE 149.85 AP 00325456 2012/06/201 MIDWEST TAPE 105.49 AP 00325455 2012/06/201 MCWELCO PRODUCTS 2,484.73 AP 00325454 2012/06/201 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 92.16 AP 00325453 2012/06/20 ( MCI 35.09 AP 00325452 2012/06/201 MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 76.29 AP 00325451 2012/06/201 MATERIAL SALES UNLIMITED 1,001.23 AP 00325450 2012/06/201 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP 00325450 2012/06/201 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP 00325450 2012/06/201 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP 00325450 2012/06/20 1 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP 00325449 2012/06/20 l MARK CHRISTOPHER BQC 357.06 AP 00325448 2012/06/20 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,581.61 AP 00325448 2012/06/20 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 108.00 Ap 00325448 2012/06/20 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 108.00 AP 00325448 2012/06/20 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 108.00 AP 00325448 2012/06/20 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,737.36 AP 00325448 2012/06/20 1 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 870.75 AP 00325448 2012/06/201 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 696.51 AP 00325448 2012/06/201 MARIl'OSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 822.67 AP 00325448 2012/06/20 l MARB'OSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,059.09 AP 00325448 2012/06/201 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,022.47 AP 00325448 2012/06/20 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 6,578.73 AP 00325448 2012/06/201 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 15,998.13 AP 00325448 2012/06/20 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 587.54 AP 00325448 2012/06/20 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,289.21 AP 00325448 2012/06/201 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC ~ 618.29 AP 00325448 2012/06/20 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 31.71 AP 00325447 2012/06/20 ( LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 1,600.00 AP 00325447 2012/06/20 1 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 825.00 AP Ob325447 2012/06/201 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 550.00 AP 00325445 2012/06/201 LEO'S PARTY RENTALS 119.06 AP 00325444 2012/06/201 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 1,225.26 AP 00325444 2012/06/20 1 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 3,349.04 Ap 00325443 2012/06/201 KUSTOM IMPRINTS 734.62 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 35 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P92 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325442 2012/06/201 KOVENSKY, JANNA 40.00 AP 00325440 2012/06/20 ( KLEEN BLAST 62.97 AP 00325439 2012/06/20 ( KENS SPORTING GOODS 2,875.79 AP 00325439 2012/06/20 f KENS SPORTING GOODS 2,875.79 AP 00325438 2012/06/20 ( K. HOVNANIAN HOMES 59.31 AP 00325437 2012/06/20 ( JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,305.00 AP 00325436 2012/06/20 ( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 374.93 AP 00325436 2012/06/20 t JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES -5.77 AP 00325436 2012/06/20 ( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 227.54 AP 00325436 2012/06/20 ( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 79.30 AP 00325436 2012/06/201 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 34.59 AP 00325436 2012/06/201 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 5.41 AP 00325436 2012/06/201 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 6.78 AP 00325435 2012/06/201 JDC INC 1,107.77 AP 00325434 2012/06/201 J&D GUILLIAM CONSTRUCTION INC 275.00 AP 00325433 2012/06/201 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC 393.21 AP 00325432 2012/06/201 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 3,348.00 Al' 00325432 2012/06/20 l INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 2,156.98 AP 00325431 2012/06/201 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 51.62 AP 00325431 2012/06/201 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 55.40 AP 00325431 2012/06/201 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 34.84 AP 00325431 2012/06/20 t INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 64.72 AP 00325431 2012/06/20( INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 82.47 AP 00325431 2012/06/20 l INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 64.13 AP 00325465 2012/06/20 ( OAKVIEW CONSTRUCTORS INC -39,583.92 AP 00325465 2012/06/20 ( OAKVIEW CONSTRUCTORS INC 395,839.19 AP 00325463 2012/06/20 ( NEXTEL 1,122.62 AP 00325431 2012/06/20 l INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 58.53 AP 00325431 2012/06/201 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 40.10 AP 00325430 2012/06/201 INLAND OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY 67.34 AP 00325429 2012/06/201 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOAR 738.94 AP 00325429 2012/06/201 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOAR 936.98 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 16.14 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 t INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 733.23 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 t INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 308.28 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 96.01 Ap 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 511.58 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 46.53 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 24.94 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 300.48 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 25.52 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 56.43 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 16.00 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 1,506.12 Ap 00325428 2012/06/20 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS _ -49.33 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 36 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P93 Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No: Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 81.67 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 510.50 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 2.35 AP 00325428 2012/06/201 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 26.24 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 t INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 10.58 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 1.85 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 915.54 AP 00325428 2012/06/20 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 8.35 AP 00325424 2012/06/20 ( HOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC. 877.47 AP 00325423 2012/06/20 ( HOSE MAN INC 192.52 AP 00325423 2012/06/20 ( HOSE MAN INC 120.61 AP 00325423 2012/06/20 ( HOSE MAN INC 11.99 AP 00325423 2012/06/20 ( HOSE MAN INC ~ 4.86 AP 00325423 2012/06/20 ( HOSE MAN INC ~ ~ 36.10 AP 00325416 2012/06/20 ( GRAINGER 159.31 AP 00325416 2012/06/20 ( GRAINGER 214.02 AP 00325416 2012/06/20 ( GRAINGER 30.02 AP 00325416 2012/06/201 GRAINGER 55.36 AP 00325416 2012/06/201 GRAINGER 65.05 AP 00325416 2012/06/201 GRAINGER 58.58 AP 00325416 2012/06/201 GRAINGER 97.59 AP 00325415 2012/06/201 GOSE, DALE 21.54 AP 00325407 2012/06/20 f FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 3,884.82 AP 00325406 2012/06/20 ( FORD OF UPLAND INC 109.28 AP 00325406 2012/06/20 t FORD OF UPLAND INC 104.52 AP 00325406 2012/06/20 ( FORD OF UPLAND INC 154.97 AP 00325405 2012/06/20 ( FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 340.00 AP 00325404 2012/06/20 f FLORID, JOAN 25.00 AP 00325401 2012/06/20 ( FLEET SERVICES INC. ~ 16.33 AP 00325400 2012/06/20 ( FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 112.60 AP 00325393 2012/06/20 ( EMBROIDME 56.55 AP 00325392 2012/06/20 ( ELLIS ENTERPRISES 70.00 Ap 00325392 2012/06/20 l ELLIS ENTERPRISES 1,000.00 AP 00325392 2012/06/201 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 110.00 AP 00325392 2012/06/201 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 50.00 AP 00325392 2012/06/201 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 330.00 AP 00325392 2012/06/20 l ELLIS ENTERPRISES 75.00 AP 00325392 2012/06/20 f ELLIS ENTERPRISES 50.00 AP 00325388 2012/06/201 DURKEL, CAROL 56.61 AP 00325387 2012/06/20 t DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 212.37 AP 00325385 2012/06/20 ( DEMCO INC 75.57 AP 00325383 2012/06/20 ( DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 3,358.80 AP 00325383 2012/06/20 ( DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 16,690.00 AP 00325382 2012/06/20 ( D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 539.29 AP 00325465 2012/06/20 ( OAKVIEW CONSTRUCTORS INC 144,819.22 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 37 Current Date: 07/11/: Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P94 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325465 2012/06/20 I OAKVIEW CONSTRUCTORS DJC -14,481.92 AP 00325466 2012/06/201 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 1,566.00 AP 00325466 2012/06/201 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 132.00 AP 00325467 2012/06/201 OCLC INC 46.39 AP 00325468 2012/06/201 OFFICE DEPOT 1,500.74 Ap 00325469 2012/06/20 l OLOTOA, SHARON 40.00 AP 00325470 2012/06/20 ( ONTRAC 64.33 AP 00325470 2012/06/201 ONTRAC 43.79 Ap 00325471 2012/06/201 OUTREACH NATION 500.00 AP 00325472 2012/06/20 f PACIFIC MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS 11,752.41 AP 00325473 2012/06/20 [ PACIFIC TELEMANAGEMENT SERVICES 3,825.00 AP 00325474 2012/06/201 PARSAC 341,329.00 AP 00325474 2012/06/20 ( PARSAC 233,880.00 AP 00325475 2012/06/20 ( PATCHETT & ASSOCIATES 925.00 AP 00325475 2012/06/20 [ PATCHETT & ASSOCIATES 99.00 AP 00325476 2012/06/20 ( PATTON SALES CORP 38.25 AP 00325477 2012/06/201 PELLEGRINO CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC 1,000.00 AP 00325478 2012/06/201 PENNY PLUMBING 272.50 AP 00325479 2012/06/20 I PEP BOYS 15.09 AP 00325479 2012/06/201 PEP BOYS 71.12 AP 00325480 2012/06/201 PEPSI-COLA 292.50 AP 00325481 2012/06/201 PIP PRINTING 263.99 AP 00325482 2012/06/201 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 1,783.50 AP 00325484 2012/06/201 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 99.22 Ap 00325484 2012/06/201 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 75.00 AP 00325484 2012/06/20 I R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 468.43 AP . 00325484 2012/06/201 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 268.67 AP 00325484 2012/06/201 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 40.73 AP 00325484 - 2012/06/201 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 225.02 AP 00325484 2012/06/20 l R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 34.72 AP 00325484 2012/06/201 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 40.73 AP 00325484. 2012/06/20 I R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 42.99 AP 00325484 2012/06/20 ( R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 36.33 AP `00325484 2012/06/20 ( R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 42.99 AP 00325484 2012/06/20 ( R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 36.33 AP 00325484 2012/06/20 ( R AND R AUTOMOTNE 36.33 Ap 00325484 2012/06/201 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE 507.19 AP 00325484 2012/06/201 R AND R AUTOMOTNE 496.10 AP 00325484 2012/06/201 R AND R AUTOMOTNE 530.57 AP 00325484 2012/06/20 1 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 317.03 Ap 00325485 2012/06/201 R.J. MARSHBURN 4,000.00 AP 00325486 2012/06/201 RANGEL, HUGO 500.00 AP 00325487 2012/06/201 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 57.92 AP 00325487 2012/06/201 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 189.64 AP 00325487 2012/06/20 l RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 179.73 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 38 Current Date: 07/I1/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P95 Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325487 2012/06/20 ( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 160.33 AP 00325487 2012/06/20 ( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 18.86 AP 00325488 2012/06/201 RDO TRUST #80-5800 131.24 AP 00325489 2012/06/20 ( REISTER, ALICIA 96.96 AP 00325490 2012/06/201 REPUBLIC ITS 17,764.21 AP 00325490 2012/06/20 l REPUBLIC ITS 12,104.00 AP 00325490 2012/06/201 REPUBLIC ITS 3,327.90 AP 00325491 2012/06/20 1 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 12,854.77 AP 00325492 2012/06/201 RIGHTWAY 486.20 AP 00325493 2012/06/20 I ROMERO, ENEYDA 78.00 AP 00325494 2012/06/20 I SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 1,818.25 AP 00325494 2012/06/20 I SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 130.80 AP 00325495 2012/06/201 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,481.56 AP 00325496 2012/06/201 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,481.56 AP 00325498 2012/06/201 SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES, THE 672.38 AP 00325499 2012/06/201 SCORPION BACKHOE INC 2,450.00 AP 00325500 2012/06/201 SIGN SHOP, THE 517.20 AP 00325500 2012/06/201 SIGN SHOP, THE 96.98 AP 00325502 2012/06/20 l SOURCE GRAPHICS 290.38 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,806.69 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.01 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.51 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.23 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.94 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.03 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.98 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.22 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.91 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.91 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.23 Ap 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.18 Ap 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.33 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.87 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.74 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.58 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 46.46 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 39 Current Dale: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P96 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount pP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.77 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.69 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.37 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.55 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.33 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.1 I AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.48 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.60 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.22 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.29 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.11 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 Ap 00325509 2012/061201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.00 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.13 Ap 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.52 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.26 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.73 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.36 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.26 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509. 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.72 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.98 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.63 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.46 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.01 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.61 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.93 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 40 _ Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P97 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.09 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.36 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.98 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.63 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.81 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.75 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.63 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.72 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.66 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 195.36 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.75 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.53 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.93 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.95 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.87 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.28 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.11 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.23 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.13 Ap 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.26 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.96 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.34 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.88 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.03 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.88 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 Ap 00325509 2012/06/20 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 158.60 Ap 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,233.75 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.50 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.05 Ap 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 152.41 User VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 41 Current Date: 07/11/: Report; CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A¢enda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P98 Check No. ~ Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325509 2012/06/20 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.12 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.35 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.30 Ap 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - 49.23 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.53 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.91 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.99 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.74 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.48 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.48 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.84 Ap 00325509 2012/06/20 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 162.65 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 511.84 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.95 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.60 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.11 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.46 Ap 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.08 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.53 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.14 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.79 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.95 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.54 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.79 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.42 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,454.00 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 827.16 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.66 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.24 AP 00325509 20]2/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.99 Ap 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.79 qP 00325509 2012/06/20 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.85 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.75 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.16 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.03 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 42 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout. Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re¢ister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P99 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount Ap 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.26 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 I SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 218.69 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 203.04 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 146.71 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.08 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.46 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.46 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.09 Ap 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.37 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11,417.81 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.39 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 680.33 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.27 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.21 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.17 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.89 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.71 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 624.60 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 581.63 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 332.34 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.91 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.66 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.16 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 180.73 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.56 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.32 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 328.29 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 123.73 AP 00325509. 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.48 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 297.93 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.15 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.94 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.32 Ap 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 43 Current Date; 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P100 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.29 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.40 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.82 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.95 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.52 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.30 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00325509 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.74 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.34 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.77 AP 00325509 ~ 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.86 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.62 Ap 00325509 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.01 AP 00325510 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7.81 AP 00325510 2012/06/201 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.46 AP 00325510 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 263.73 AP 00325510 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.43 AP 00325510 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 299.76 AP 00325510 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ]78.20 AP 00325511 2012/06/20 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.92 AP 00325512 2012/06/20 ( SPARKLETTS 78.47 AP . 00325513 2012/06/20 ( SPOONFACTORY 60.00 AP 00325513 2012/06/201 SPOONFACTORY 140.00 AP 00325513 2012/06/20 ( SPOONFACTORY 210.00 AP 00325513 2012/06/20 ( SPOONFACTORY 3,500.00 AP 00325513 2012/06/20 ( SPOONFACTORY 2,030.00 AP 00325513 2012/06/20 ( SPOONFACTORY 1,050.00 AP 00325513 2012/06/20 ( SPOONFACTORY 70.00 AP 00325514 2012/06/20 ( STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 800.00 AP 00325515 2012/06/20 ( STEEVE, WILMA 117.11 AP 00325516 2012/06/20 ( STOVER SEED COMPANY 526.82 AP 00325517 2012/06/20 l SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 571.00 AP 00325518 2012/06/20 l TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 1,798.89 AP 00325595 2012/06/271 BISHOP COMPANY 3,106.72 AP 00325595 2012/06/271 BISHOP COMPANY 631.46 AP 00325594 2012/06/271 BERN MARIES PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 1,087.92 AP 00325593 2012/06/27 l BARNES AND NOBLE 949.67 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 44 Curren[ Date: 07/1 I/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P101 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325593 2012/06/27 I BARNES AND NOBLE 642.00 AP 00325592 2012/06/271 AVANTS, MARGE _ 120.00 AP 00325592 2012/06/271 AVANTS, MARGE 150.00 AP 00325591 2012/06/27 ( AUTO RESTORATORS INC 2,161.03 AP 00325590 2012/06/27 ( AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 63.10 AP 00325611 2012/06/27 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 AP 00325610 2012/06/27 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 150.00 AP 00325609 2012/06/27 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 294.29 AP 00325608 2012/06/27 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 AP 00325607 2012/06/27 l CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00 AP 00325606 2012/06/27 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, 100.00 AP 00325605 2012/06/27 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 AP 00325604 2012/06/27 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 AP 00325603 2012/06/27 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 72.50 AP 00325626 2012/06/27 ( CONTACT SECURITY INC 350.73 AP 00325626 2012/06/27 l CONTACT SECURITY INC 2,961.72 AP 00325626 2012/06/27 ( CONTACT SECURITY INC 4,364.64 AP 00325626 2012/06/27 ( CONTACT SECURITY INC 2,909.76 AP 00325626 2012/06/271 CONTACT SECURITY INC 1,961.48 AP 00325626 2012/06/271 CONTACT SECURITY INC 2,494.08 AP 00325625 2012/06/271 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 2,206.80 AP 00325624 2012/06/27 I COCHERELL, DOREEN 153.60 AP 00325623 2012/06/271 CLARKS PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 79.52 AP 00325622 2012/06/27 t CLARK, KAREN 846.00 AP 00325622 2012/06/27 ( CLARK, KAREN 144.00 AP 00325621 2012/06/27 t CIRIACKS, VALERIE ANN 96.00 AP 00325621 2012/06/27 ( CIRIACKS, VALERIE ANN 96.00 AP 00325620 2012/06/27 ( CHO, ANGELA 57.60 AP 00325619 2012/06/27 ( CHILTON, GABRIELLE 528.00 AP 00325618 2012/06/27 t CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 175.00 AP 00325617 2012/06/27 ( CHEN, DAVID 355.50 AP 00325616 2012/06/27 ( CDW-G ~ 517.68 AP 00325615 2012/06/27 ( CARTY, DIANE 648.00 AP 00325613 2012/06/27 ( CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 129.75 AP 00325612 2012/06/27 ( CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CORI 135.00 AP 00325612 2012/06/27 ( CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CORI 35.00 AP 00325602 2012/06/271 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3,650.00 AP 00325601 2012/06/271 CALBO 405.00 AP 00325600 2012/06/271 CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 62.63 AP 00325599 2012/06/271 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES 478.80 AP 00325599 2012/06/27 I BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES 308.00 AP 00325598 2012/06/271 BRENT BINNALL 2,402.69 AP 00325597 2012/06/271 BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN 659.33 AP 00325596 2012/06/271 BOGEA, GABRIELA 82.00 AP 00325521 2012/06/20 l UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA PARS TRUSTEE 1,875.61 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 45 Current Date; 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AHenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Ap 00325522 2012/06/20 1 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA PARS TRUSTEE AP 00325523 2012/06/201 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA PARS TRUSTEE AP 00325524 2012/06/20 l UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC AP 00325525 2012/06/20 ( UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC AP 00325527 2012/06/20( UPS AP 00325527 2012/06/20 ( UPS AP 00325527 2012/06/20 ( UPS AP 00325529 2012/06/201 VASQUEZ CONSTRUCTION AP 00325530 2012/06/201 Verizon AP 00325531 2012/06/20 I VERIZON BUSINESS AP 00325533 2012/06/20 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/201 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP ' 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA Ap 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/201 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/20 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325533 2012/06/201 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 00325534 2012/06/201 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP 00325535 2012/06/201 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LLC AP 00325536 2012/06/201 VISTA PAINT P702 Amoum 28,218.73 3,900.00 686.74 10.60 32.60 28.57 88.96 4,920.00 35.41 1,589.81 87.89 475.70 37.42 38.59 38.59 51.62 39.45 18.65 37.42 18.14 18.14 38.59 37.42 18.14 54.88 20.24 74.85 42.85 49.17 23.52 37.42 20.20 40.69 171.33 20.20 49.13 49.13 37.42 149.69 115.76 170.06 659.05 3,362.36 336.31 182.46 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 46 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P103 Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325537 2012/06/20 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 88.79 AP 00325537 2012/06/20 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 608.68 AP 00325537 2012/06/20 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 48.49 AP 00325538 2012/06/20 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 816.31 AP 00325538 2012/06/20 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,038.44 AP 00325538 2012/06/20 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 200.42 AP 00325539 2012/06/20 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES-CORP 4,47L63 AP 00325539 2012/06/20 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 6.21 AP 00325539 2012/06/20 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 3.90 AP 00325539 2012/06/20 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 137.68 AP 00325540 2012/06/20 ( WESTCOAST MEDIA 900.50 AP 00325541 2012/06/20 ( WHITTIER FERTILIZER 506.43 AP Ob325542 2012/06/20 ( WILD WONDERS INC 600.00 AP 00325542 2012/06/201 WILD WONDERS INC 600.00 AP 00325543 2012/06/20 l WINZER CORPORATION 111.71 AP 00325544 2012/06/201 XTREME DETAILING 450.00 AP 00325544 2012/06/20 l - XTREME DETAILING 600.00 AP 00325545 2012/06/20 l ZEE MEDICAL INC 90.06 AP 00325545 2012/06/201 ZEE MEDICAL INC 811.80 AP 00325833 2012/07/03 I ABM JANITORIAL SW 43,055.11 AP 00325833 2012/07/03 1 ABM JANITORIAL SW 970.48 AP 00325834 2012/07/03 1 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 527.06 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 l ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 1 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 1 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 1 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 1 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 I ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 ( ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 ( ADOBE AMMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 ( ADOBE AMMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 ( ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL - 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 ( ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 l ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 1 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 1 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 Ap 00325835 2012/07/03 ( ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 1 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 1 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 I ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 1 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 l ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 1 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325835 2012/07/03 1 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 Ap 00325836 2012/07/03 ( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 128.00 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 47 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P104 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325836 2012/07/03 1 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT - 96.50 AP 00325836 2012/07/03 1 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 128.00 AP 00325836 2012/07/03 1 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 96.50 AP 00325836 2012/07/03 I ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 96.50 Ap 00325836 2012/07/03 l ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 65.00 AP 00325836 2012/07/03 ( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 65.00 AP 00325836 2012/07/03 ( ADVANCED CHEMICAL.TRANSPORT 128.00 AP 00325836 2012/07/03 ( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 128.00 AP 00325836 2012/07/03 ( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 96.50 AP 00325836 2012/07/03 ( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 96.50 AP 00325837 2012/07/03 l AEI-CASC ENGINEERING INC. 8,094.12 AP 00325838 2012/07/03 l AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 341.00 AP 00325838 2012/07/03 ( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 6.40 AP 00325839 2012/07/03 ( AGILITY FUEL SYSTEMS 592.63 AP 00325839 2012/07/03 ( AGILITY FUEL SYSTEMS 592.63 AP 00325839 2012/07/03 1 AGII.ITY FUEL SYSTEMS 592.63 Ap 00325839 2012/07/03 l AGILITY FUEL SYSTEMS 592.63 AP 00325839 2012/07/03 1 AGILITY FUEL SYSTEMS 592.63 AP 00325839 2012/07/03 I AGILITY FUEL SYSTEMS 592.63 AP 00325839 2012/07/03 1 AGILITY FUEL SYSTEMS 592.63 AP 00325841 2012/07/03 1 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 4,386.69 AP 00325842 2012/07/031 ALPHAGRAPHICS 6788 AP 00325842 20]2/07/031 ALPHAGRAPHICS 22.63 AP 00325842 2012/07/03 ( ALPHAGRAPHICS 22.63 AP 00325842 2012/07/03 f ALPHAGRAPHICS 22.63 AP 00325842 2012/07/03 ( ALPHAGRAPHICS 22.63 AP 00325842 2012/07/03 ( ALPHAGRAPHICS ~ 22.63 AP 00325843 2012/07/03 ( AMERICAN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC 1,681.71 AP 00325844 2012/07/03 ( AMERICAN TRAINING RESOURCES INC 875.00 AP 00325844 2012/07/03 ( AMERICAN TRAINING RESOURCES INC 201.68 AP 00325845 2012/07/03 ( APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 7,142.00 AP 00325846 2012/07/03 l ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP 00325846 2012/07/03 ( ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP 00325847 2012/07/03 ( ARC 88.80 AP 00325848 2012/07/03 1 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 300.00 AP 00325849 2012/07/03 1 ASAP POWERSPORTS 431.00 AP 00325849 2012/07/03 1 ASAP POWERSPORTS 59.34 AP 00325850 2012/07/03 f BACHMAN, SHARON 250.00 AP 00325851 2012/07/03 ( BALDY FIRE AND SAFETY 77.00 AP 00325852 2012/07/03 ( BARKSDALE, CAROL 5.20 AP 00325853 2012/07/03 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 371.63 AP 00325853 2012/07/03 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 151.56 AP 00325853 2012/07/03 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 553.37 AP 00325853 2012/07/03 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 1,241.72 AP 00325853 2012/07/03 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 337.09 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 48 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P105 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325853 2012/07/03 1 BARNES AND NOBLE 337.09 AP 00325854 2012/07/03 ( BERG, MARK 75.41 AP 00325855 2012/07/03 ( BERNARD, JEREMY 229.50 AP 00325855 2012/07/03 ( BERNARD, JEREMY 255.00 AP 00325855 2012/07/03 ( BERNARD, JEREMY 308.70 AP 00325856 2012/07/03 ( BERNARD, JESSICA NASH 229.50 AP 00325856 2012/07/03 l BERNARD, JESSICA NASH 255.00 AP 00325856 2012/07/031 BERNARD, JESSICA NASH 308.70 AP 00325857 2012/07/03 1 BOLTON, HEATHER 59.39 AP 00325858 2012/07/03 1 BOWMAN, MARKETTA 65.00 AP 00325859 2012/07/03 1 BRAMBILA, RUBEN 5,833.33 AP 00325860 2012/07/03 1 BRESLIN, JOANN 35.00 AP 00325861 2012/07/03 I BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 5,672.83 AP 00325862 2012/07/03 1 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 912.21 AP 00325863 2012/07/03 l CASCADE TURF LLC 227.53 AP 00325863 2012/07/03 1 CASCADE TURF LLC 250.08 AP 00325864 2012/07/03 ( CASTELLANOS, RAQUEL 47.00 AP 00325866 2012/07/03 ( CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 500.00 AP 00325867 2012/07/03 ( CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 19934 AP 00325867 2012/07/03( CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 32.33 AP 00325867 2012/07/03( CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 242.44 AP 00325868 2012/07/03 1 COLUMBUS SUPPLY 771.14 AP 00325869 2012/07/03 1 COMMERCIAL TRANSPORATION SERVICES 195.00 AP 00325870 2012/07/031 CONFIRMDELIVERY.COM 93.00 AP 00325870 2012/07/031 CONFIRMDELIVERY.COM 15.00 AP 00325872 2012/07/03 1 COP TOWN UNIFORMS INC. 310.00 AP 00325873 2012/07/03 1 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 775.10 AP 00325874 2012/07/03 1 CRISTIANA, AMISTAD 500.00 AP 00325875 2012/07/03 ( CSD LAND SURVEYING 3,200.00 AP 00325875 2012/07/03 1 CSD LAND SURVEYING 854.00 AP 00326039 2012/07/03 1 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 145,725.35 AP 00326040 2012/07/03 ( CAL DEVELOPMENT LLC. 2,650.00 AP 00326041 2012/07/03 ( CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 137,520.91 AP 00326041 2012/07/03 f CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 495.07 AP 00326042 2012/07/03 ( CARGANILLA, PAUL 500.00 AP 00326043 2012/07/03 ( DELTA DENTAL 40,589.52 AP 00326044 2012/07/03 l INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 133.64 AP 00326045 2012/07/03 1 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 162,590.98 AP 00326045 2012/07/03 1 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 456.54 AP 00326045 2012/07/03 1 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 1,379.64 AP 00326046 2012/07/03 ( LOS ANGELES TIMES 172.80 AP 00326047 2012/07/03 ( PARSAC 3,323.00 AP 00326048 2012/07/03 ( PYRO SPECTACULARS INC 15,000.00 AP 00326050 2012/07/03 ( SAF-R-DIG UTILITY SURVEYS INC 2,000.00 AP 00326051 2012/07/03 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOC OF GOVERNME 15,250.00 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 49 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P106 Check No.~ Check Date Vendor Name - Amount AP 00326052 2012/07/03 ( STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 13,459.36 AP 00326052 2012/07/03 ( STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 3,075.31 AP 00326053 2012/07/03 ( STARWAY PRODUCTIONS 100.00 AP 00326054 2012/07/03 ( VASTA, WILLIAM 700.00 AP 00326055 2012/07/03 ( W L BUTLER CONSTRUCTION INC 500.00 AP 00326056 2012/07/03 ( WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL CALIFORNIA INC 1,000.00 AP 00326057 2012/07/03( WE TIP INC 7,740.00 AP 00325820 2012/06/28 l AUTO BODY 2000 931.20 Ap 00325820 2012/06/28 1 AUTO BODY 2000 857.54 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,180.57 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 88.89 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,891.61 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 902.39 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 162.25 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,071.50 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 848.12 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.82 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 576.22 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.56 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 34.97 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 77.14 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 837.06 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.62 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,242.43 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 802.88 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,106.28 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 887.10 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 176.07 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,744.92 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.10 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,395.56 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 224.95 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 113.06 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,032.37 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 971.91 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 63.73 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( ~ CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 213.45 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 205.92 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 881.82 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 74.52 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ~ 79.32 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.90 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 616.99 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,811.59 AP 00325823 -2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 234.65 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ ~ Page: 50 Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date; 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Ap 00325823 2012/06/28 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Ap 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Ap 00325823 2012/06/28 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP 00325823 2012/06/28 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Ap 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT P107 Amount. 219.25 1,043.57 119.67 1,128.38 92.47 200.15 86.08 192.75 159.42 139.12 1,039.26 181.54 82.55 97.36 259.98 164.23 52.06 101.06 97.42 160.12 116.52 114.67 195.27 208.79 158.18 198.25 320.29 5,063.07 7.118.09 829.49 3,344.68 1,714.10 2,847.99 2,925.53 95.83 2,949.75 572.17 128.82 390.71 2,391.17 4,925.35 2,318.54 840.21 1,004.15 172.10 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 51 Report. CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P108 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,187.58 AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,236.79 AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - 1,735.02 AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,625.18 AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 165.61 AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 123.45 AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 58.43 AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 290.98 AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 624.56 AP 00325823 2012/06/281 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 149.28 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.71 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 789.36 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,471.09 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 343.69 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ]55.88 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 389.97 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 381.06 AP 00325823 2012/06/28 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.80 AP 00325824 2012/06/28 ( DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 5,155.12 AP 00325824 2012/06/28 ( DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 181.02 AP 00325825 2012/06/28 ( DANS LAWNMOWER CENTER 2,000.00 AP 00325825 2012/06/28 ( DANS LAWNMOWER CENTER 2,172.07 AP 00325826 2012/06/28 ( DAPPER TIRE CO 996.16 AP 00325826 2012/06/28 ( DAPPER TIRE CO 241.67 AP 00325826 2012/06/28 ( DAPPER TIRE CO 1,680.96 AP 00325827 2012/06/28 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 456.41 AP 00325827 2012/06/28 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 296.95 AP 00325827 2012/06/28 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 60.30 AP 00325827 2012/06/28 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 739.72 AP 00325828 2012/06/28 ( HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 349.77 AP 00325830 2012/06/28 1 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,204.65 AP 00325830 2012/06/281 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 4,057.44 AP 00325830 2012/06/281 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 2,028.71 AP 00325831 2012/06/281 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 480.60 AP 00325831 2012/06/28 I TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,150.81 AP 00325831 2012/06/281 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,569.60 AP 00325831 2012/06/281 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 14,406.68 AP 00325831 2012/06/28 I TRUGREEN LANDCARE 20,018.55 AP 00325831 2012/06/28 I TRUGREEN LANDCARE 401.25 AP 00325831 2012/06/28 l TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,556.32 AP 00325831 2012/06/28 ( TRUGREEN LANDCARE 216.50 AP 00325831 2012/06/28 ( TRUGREEN LANDCARE 523.52 AP 00325831 2012/06/28 ( TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,813.85 AP 00325831 2012/06/28 ( TRUGREEN LANDCARE 844.92 AP 00325569 2012/06/27 ( A&V SOFTBALL 3,525.00 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 52 Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Curren[ Dale: 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP 00325570 2012/06/27 ( A'JONTUE, ROSE ANN AP 00325571 2012/06/27 ( A.Y. NURSERY INC. AP 00325572 2012/06/27 ( ACADEMY OF MUSIC AP 00325573 2012/06/27 ( WEATHERBY, ADRIANA AP 00325574 2012/06/27 ( ADVANCED UTILITY SYSTEMS CORP. AP 00325575 2012/06/27 ( AED BRANDS AP 00325576 2012/06/27( AGILINE INC AP 00325576 2012/06/27 ( AGILINE INC AP 00325576 2012/06/27( AGILINE INC AP 00325577 2012/06/27 ( ALFONSO, ASHLING AP 00325579 2012/06/27 ( ALL WELDING AP 00325579 2012/06/27 ( ALL WELDING AP 00325580 2012/06/27 ( ALLDATA Ap 00325581 2012/06/27 ( ALLEN, JOSH AP 00325582 ~ 2012/06/27 ( ANYTIME FITNESS AP 00325583 2012/06/27 ( AQUINQ, MARTIN AP 00325584 2012/06/27 ( ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES AP 00325585 2012/06/27 ( ARC AP 00325586 2012/06/27 ( AROCHQ ALMA AP 00325586 2012/06/27 ( AROCHQ ALMA AP 00325587 2012/06/27 ( ASAP POWERSPORTS AP 00325589 2012/06/27 ( ASSI SECURITY AP 00325589 2012/06/27 ( ASST SECURITY AP 00325589 2012/06/27 ( ASSI SECURITY Ap 00325589 2012/06/27 ( ASST SECURITY AP 00325589 2012/06/27 ( ASSI SECURITY AP 00325589 2012/06/27 ( ASST SECURITY AP 00325589 2012/06/27 ( ASSI SECURITY AP 00325546 2012/06/21 ( ABC LOCKSMITHS Ap 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552. 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS P109 Amoum 468.00 191.80 1,184.40 32.00 5,000.00 . 4,410.00 1,240.00 120.00 200.00 477.00 1,736.85 1,000.00 1,616.25 105.00 197.40 52.00 3.35 221.75 334.80 151.20 197.13 585.00 105.00 165.00 135.00 535.00 820.00 577.71 371.40 294.73 11.41 15.69 45.34 51.55 106.02 41.50 31.34 5.81 15.88 182.87 51.64 106.17 21.29 31.03 28.58 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 53 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS Ap 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 f BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS Ap 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS Ap 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS P710 Amount 15.66 15.51 53.32 42.54 24..-20 . 38.73 71.77 9.50 9.85 42.49 84.57 7.75 103.72 79.92 107.10 10.07 10.78 10.63 36.58 19.02 19.02 188.91 3.84 5.78 22.11 1,185.58 16.47 33.98 8.95 4.47 4.47 4.47 4.47 13.41 20.04 26.67 4.47 13.41 8.94 8.94 6.63 6.63 57.96 8.94 64.74 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 54 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P1 ~ 1 Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No, Check Dale Vendor Name ~ - Amount AP 00325552 ~ 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 37.77 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 0032SSS2 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 13.26 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 0032SS52 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 0032SSS2 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 11.10 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 20.04 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS ~ 6.63 AP 0032SSS2 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 366.24 AP 0032SSS2 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP' 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP- 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 26.82 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00325552 .2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 37.77 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP 00325SS2 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 39.78 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 94.09 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 41.50 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 37.18 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 14.01 AP 0032SS52 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 26.18 AP 0032SS52 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 15.23 AP 00325SS2 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 113.11 AP 00325SS2 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 14.00 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 41.67 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 64.96 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 24.73 AP 00325SS2 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 22.36 AP 00325SS2 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 60.45 AP 00325SS2 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 35.71 AP Ob3255S2 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 42.49 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 22.26 AP 00325SS2 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 106.55 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 34.89 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 f BRODART BOOKS 28.00 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: SS Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout ~ Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P112 Agenda Check ReEister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 25.74 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 10.78 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 10.07 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 34.50 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS ~ 46.65 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 11.15 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 19.02 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS ~ 29.65 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 25.11 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 1,198.73 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 10.63 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 25.98 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 1,076.91 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 13.41 Ap 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 28.83 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 17.88 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 11.10 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 4.47 Ap 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 28.98 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 13.26 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 11.10 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 13.26 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS, 19.89 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 13.25 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 15.57 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 357.31 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 ( BRODART BOOKS 46.41 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 11.10 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 1 BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00325552 2012/06/21 l BRODART BOOKS 328.47 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 601.47 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 648.08 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 87.83 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 56 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Ap 00325555 AP 00325555 AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 00325555 Check Date Vendor Name 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT P113 Amoum 698.23 193.45 824.62 646.21 750.16 207.90 1,267.27 1,145.95 983.14 1,195.22 153.25 1,782.73 9.81 24.45 119.15 145.98 148.74 246.72 357.12 234.59 137.97 127.18 53.40 270.68 234.39 64.60 62.97 76.74 167.33 133.49 184.57 125.50 374.91 990.98 53.39 236.39 104.37 201.16 280.96 239.84 162.72 149.57 84.07 471.01 91.77 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 57 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P714 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name ~ Amouni AP 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.98 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 138.60 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.48 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 50.23 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 582.44 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 61.14 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.08 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 187.14 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 210.26 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 145.59 Ap 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ~ 64.60 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 158.97 Ap 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 642.58 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 50.57 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 197.47 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 215.67 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 219.18 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 254.37 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 f CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 153.49 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 78.16 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 212.55 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 245.30 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 589.03 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 374.64 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 374.63 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 53.39 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 78.52 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 78.52 pp 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 175.49 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 199.92 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT i5L41 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 383.22 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 329.48 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 138.03 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 138.03 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.66 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.66 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 179.03 Ap 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 241.05 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 312.90 Ap 00325555 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 788.28 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATERDISTRICT 97.05 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 210.96 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 392.13 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 163.01 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 58 Current Date; 07/11/: Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P115 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name - Amoum AP 00325555 2012/06/2] 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 372.28 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 458.30 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 451.03 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 f CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 206.20 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 206.19 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 99.96 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 145.84 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 468.40 AP 00325555 2012/06/21 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 317.23 AP 00325556 2012/06/21 ( DAPPER TIRE CO 3,307.06 AP 00325556 2012/06/21 1 DAPPER TIRE CO 677.72 AP 00325557 2012/06/211 EMCORSERVICE 1,188.83 AP 00325557 2012/06/211 EMCORSERVICE 15,997.75 AP 00325558 2012/06/21 ( EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 150.01 AP 00325559 2012/06/21 l GOLF VENTURES WEST 97.19 AP 00325560 2012/06/21 1 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 60.88 AP 00325560 2012/06/21 1 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,082.98 AP 00325560 2012/06/21 l HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 426.99 AP 00325560 2012/06/21 l HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 250.00 AP 00325561 2012/06/21 ( HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 9:54 AP 00325561 2012/06/21 1 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 64.72 AP 00325561 2012/06/21 I HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 271.53 AP 00325561 2012/06/21 1 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 136.70 AP 00325561 2012/06/21 1 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC -48.22 AP 00325561 2012/06/21 1 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 4.41 AP 00325562 2012/06/21 I LIMS AUTO INC ~ 858.34 AP 00325563 2012/06/21 I NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 11,253.56 AP 00325563 2012/06/21 1 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 39,351.20 AP 00325563 2012/06/21 I NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 11,253.56 AP 00325563 2012/06/21 ( NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC -1,592.41 AP 00325563 2012/06/21 1 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 731.00 AP 00325564 2012/06/21 ( TRUGREEN LANDCARE 341.25 AP 00325565 2012/06/2] ( TW TELECOM 4,010.97 AP 00325092 2012/06/13 ( A&V SOFTBALL 2,100.00 AP 00325093 2012/06/13 l A.Y. NURSERY INC. 68.96 AP 00325094 2012/06/13 ( Al AUTOMOTIVE 283.38 AP 00325095 2012/06/13 1 ABM JANITORIAL SW 9,059.00 AP 00325096 2012/06/13 1 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 170.50 AP 00325096 2012/06/13 1 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 170.50 AP 00325097 2012/06/13 I AGILINE INC 1,400.00 AP 00325097 2012/06/13 I AGILINE INC 20.00 AP 00325097 2012/06/13 ( AGILINE INC 180.00 AP 00325100 2012/06/13 ( ALTEC INDUSTRIES 779.72 AP 00325101 2012/06/13 I AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 220.24 AP 00325101 2012/06/13 f AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 270.46 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 59 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P116 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325101 2012/06/131 AMTECHELEVATORSERVICES 250.37 AP 00325102 2012/06/13 1 ANIMAL HEALTH & SANITARY SUPPLY 1,067.46 AP 00325103 2012/06/13 1 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 149,073.26 AP 00325104 2012/06/13 1 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 7,333.53 AP 00325106 2012/06/13 ( ASPA 100.00 AP 00325107 2012/06/13 1 ASSET SYSTEMS INC. 1,450.00 AP 00325108 - 2012/06/13 f BARBARA'S ANSWERING SERVICE 572.00 AP 00325109 2012/06/13 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 1,060.40 Ap 00325109 2012/06/13 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 439.60 Ap 00325109 2012/06/13 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 552.42 AP 00325109 2012/06/13 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 177.51 AP 00325109 2012/06/13 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 1,048.00 AP 00325109 2012/06/13 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 137.55 AP 00325110 2012/06/13 ( BARTOLINI, EDWARD 25.00 AP 00325112 2012/06/13 ( BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC 125.10 AP 00325326 2012/06/14 ( ABC LOCKSMITHS 167.71 AP 00325326 2012/06/14 ( ABC LOCKSMITHS 892.40 AP 00325327 2012/06/14 ( AIRGAS WEST 181.66 AP 00325328 2012/06/14 ( AUTO BODY 2000 1,998.09 AP 00325329 2012/06/14 l COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00325329 2012/06/14 ( COMP U ZONE 49.03 AP 00325329 2012/06/14 l COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00325329 2012/06/14 ( COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00325329 2012/06/14 l COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00325330 2012/06/141 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 348.73 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.09 AP 00325330 2012/06/141 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 653.24 AP 00325330 2012/06/141 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 411.76 Ap 00325330 20]2/06/141 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 159.76 AP 00325330 2012/06/14( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 654.73 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 751.28 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 347.91 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 443.71 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 373.70 pP 00325330 2012/06/14 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 961.01 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 894.67 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 873.26 AP 00325330 2012/06/141 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 450.94 AP 00325330 2012/06/141 - CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ~ 375.54 AP 00325330 2012/06/141 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 252.10 AP 00325330 2012/06/141 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 785.52 AP 00325330 2012/06/141 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 228.29 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 214.28 AP 00325330 2012/06/141 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.47 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 60 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A>?enda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P117 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 Ap 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 100.86 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.26 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 78.57 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 172.11 AP 00325330 2012/06/141 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 102.52 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 237.50 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 167.98 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 440.89 AP 00325330 2012/06/14 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 225.11 AP 00325330 2012/06/141 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,330.03 AP 00325330 2012/06/141 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 96.77 AP 00325330 2012/06/141 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 8,049.65 AP 00325331 2012/06/141 EMCOR SERVICE 4,892.00 AP 00325332 2012/06/14 ( EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 36.57 AP 00325333 2012/06/14 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 886.35 AP 00325333 2012/06/14 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC ~ 250.00 AP 00325333 2012/06/141 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,081.28 AP 00325333 2012/06/14 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 125.00 AP 00325333 2012/06/141 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 853.41 AP 00325333 2012/06/141 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 125.00 AP 00325334 2012/06/141 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 390.14 AP 00325334 2012/06/14 l INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 565.07 AP 00325334 2012/06/14 f INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,345.64 Ap 00325334 2012/06/14 ( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 847.31 AP 00325334 2012/06/14 ( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 175.52 AP 00325334 2012/06/14 ( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 609.17 AP 00325334 2012/06/14 ( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 864.95 AP 00325334 2012/06/14 ( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 281.36 AP 00325334 2012/06/14 ( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,248.62 AP 00325335 2012/06/14 l INTERSTATE BATTERIES 39.30 AP 00325335 2012/06/14 1 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 3,684.86 AP 00325336 2012/06/14 l LIMS AUTO INC ~ 49.05 AP 00325336 2012/06/141 LIMS AUTO INC 49.05 AP 00325336 2012/06/14 ( LIMS AUTO INC 323.62 AP 00325336 2012/06/14 ( LIMS AUTO INC 374.77 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 148.31 AP 00326091 2012/07/10( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,455.07 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 570.64 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 632.19 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 157.96 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 12,349.70 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,583.26 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,582.78 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 61 Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check ReP.ister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P118 Check No. - Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00326091 2012/07/10 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 604.24 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 18.40 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,332.15 AP 00326091 2012/07/10( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 740.26 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 735.14 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 842.35 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,853.16 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,907.38 AP -00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,472.95 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,614.16 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,419.46 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,983.20 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 91.62 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 58.15 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 64.79 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,673.54 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 171.27 AP 00326091 2012/07/]01 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 621.47 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT. 234.59 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.56 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.66 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.81 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,434.01 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 899.66 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135.38 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,288.95 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,084.79 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,302.53 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.55 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 38.16 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.37 AP 0032609] 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 31.77 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 552.86 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 171.27 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ~ 116.08 AP Ob326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.66 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.88 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 243.01 AP 00326091 20]2/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 152.81 AP 00326091 2012/07/]0 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 321.28 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 47.23 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 678.51 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 79.23 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.18 Ap 00326091 2012/07/10 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.28 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 62 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CQCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P119 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amours pP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.28 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 70.02 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 155.58 pP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 94.18 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 245.76 pP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,211.85 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 24,314.10 AP 00326091 2012/07/10 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 413.14 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 220.55 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 6,222.61 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,483.52 AP 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,376.38 Ap 00326091 2012/07/101 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,268.27 AP 00325338 2012/06/201 3SI SECURITY SYSTEMS 2,336.24 AP 00325338 2012/06/201 3SI SECURITY SYSTEMS 1,939.50 Ap 00325339 2012/06/201 909 MAGAZINE 550.00 AP 00325340 2012/06/201 A AND R TIRE SERVICE -49.33 Ap 00325340 2012/06/201 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 149.87 AP 00325340 2012/06/20 ( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 19.47 Ap 00325340 2012/06/20 1 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 15.19 AP 00325340 2012/06/201 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 19.47 AP 00325340 2012/06/20 ( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 17.47 pP 00325340 2012/06/20 ( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 38.93 AP 00325340 2012/06/20 ( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 79.99 pP 00325340 2012/06/20 l A AND R TIRE SERVICE 544.27 AP 00325340 2012/06/20 l A AND R TIRE SERVICE 19.47 AP 00325340 2012/06/20 ( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 721.69 AP 00325340 2012/06/20 l A AND R TIRE SERVICE 19.47 pP 00325340 2012/06/20 l A AND R TIKE SERVICE 19.47 AP 00325340 2012/06/201 A AND R TIl2E SERVICE 19.47 AP 00325340 2012/06/20 ( A AND R TIRE SERVICE I,44L74 AP 00325340 2012/06/201 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 554.06 AP 00325340 2012/06/201 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,496.60 AP 00325340 2012/06/20 1 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 15.19 AP 00325340 2012/06/20 ( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 49.33 Ap 00325341 2012/06/20 ( A&V SOFTBALL 2,450.00 Ap 00325342 2012/06/20 ( ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 466.64 AP 00325342 2012/06/20 l ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 1,350.70 AP 00325343 2012/06/20 ( AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1,050.00 Ap 00325343 2012/06/20 ( AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 2,087.50 AP 00325343 2012/06/20 ( AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 187.50 Ap 00325344 2012/06/20 ( ALDER, MATTHEW 100.00 AP 00325346 2012/06/201 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 21,041.35 Ap 00325346 2012/06/20 ( ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 11,014.80 AP 00325346 2012/06/201 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 18,327.85 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 63 Curren[ Date; 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Reeistei- 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P120 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum Ap 00325346 2012/06/20 ( ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 22,046.35 Ap 00325346 2012/06/20 ( ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 21,999.45 AP 00325347 2012/06/20 ( ALL WELDING 2,413.60 AP 00325349 2012/06/20 ( ALPHAGRAPHICS 181.02 AP 00325349 2012/06/20 ( ALPHAGRAPHICS 22.63 AP 00325349 2012/06/20 ( ALPHAGRAPHICS 22.63 Ap 00325349 2012/06/20 ( ALPHAGRAPHICS 22.63 AP 00325349 2012/06/201 ALPHAGRAPHICS 2].55 Ap 00325350 2012/06/201 ALVILLAR, VALERIE 30.00 AP 00325113 2012/06/13 1 BERTGES, RUTH 209.24 AP 00325114 2012/06/13 I BEST GOLF CARTS INC. 75.00 AP 00325115 2012/06/13 1 BISHOP COMPANY 1,180.83 AP 00325116 2012/06/13 1 BLOOM, JEFFREY A 7,661.92 Ap 00325117 2012/06/13 l BOLIVAR, EMILIO 15.00 AP 00325118 2012/06/13 1 CABLE INC. 1,115.00 AP 00325118 2012/06/13 l CABLE INC. 721.56 AP 00325118 2012/06/13 ( CABLE INC. 1,658.16 AP 00325118 2012/06/13 ( CABLE INC. 315.00 AP 00325119 2012/06/13 ( CADY, COREY 300.00 AP 00325120 2012/06/13 ( CAIN, ROBERT 100.00 AP 00325121 2012/06/13 ( CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 691.60 AP 00325122 2012/06/13 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 AP 00325123 2012/06/13 l CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 AP 00325124 2012/06/13 1 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00 AP 00325125 2012/06/13 1 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 AP 00325126 2012/06/13 1 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 AP 00325127 2012/06/13 1 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 72.50 AP 00325128 2012/06/13 1 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 294.29 AP 00325129 2012/06/13 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 150.00 AP 00325130 2012/06/13 l CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 111.93 AP 00325131 2012/06/13 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 Ap 00325132 2012/06/13 ( CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 129.75 AP 00325133 2012/06/13 ( CALIFORNIA, STATE OF ~ ~ 62.50 AP 00325134 2012/06/13 l CARDENAS, JOE 52.00 AP 00325135 2012/06/13 I CASCADE TURF LLC 739.67 AP 00325136 2012/06/13 l CASE POWER AND EQUIPMENT 97.78 Ap 00325137 2012/06/13 1 CASTII,LO, JESSIE 250.00 AP 00325137 2012/06/13 I CASTILLO, JESSIE -62.50 AP 00325138 2012/06/13 1 CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DNISION 175.00 AP 00325139 2012/06/13 1 CHURCH OF CHRIST OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ 195.00 AP .00325140 2012/06/13 ( CINEVATIVE 4,000.00 Ap 00325140 2012/06/13 t CINEVATIVE ~ 4,000.00 AP 00325141 2012/06/13 ( CITY RENTALS 402.82 AP 00325142 2012/06/13 l CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 704.70 AP 00325143 2012/06/13 I CLEAR STREAM RECYCLING 697.69 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 64 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Curren[ Dale; 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re>rister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P121 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name - Amoum AP 00325]45 2012/06/13 ( COAST RECREATION INC 400.00 AP 00325145 2012/06/13 1 COAST RECREATION INC 634.36 AP 00325145 2012/06/13 1 COAST RECREATION INC 1,677.75 AP 00325146 2012/06/131 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 194.86 AP 00325146 2012/06/13 1 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 79.18 AP 00325146 2012/06/13 1 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 104.42 AP 00325146 2012/06/13 1 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 432.50 AP 00325146 2012/06/13 l CONCEPT POWDER COATING 89.04 Ap 00325148 2012/06/13 1 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPA 79.40 AP 00325148 2012/06/13 1 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPA' 16.39 AP 00325149 2012/06/13 1 CORPUS, DIOGENES R. 5,000.00 AP 00325150 2012/06/13 ( CORTEZ, LAURA 500.00 AP 00325151 2012/06/13 ( CPAC INC 5,215.26 AP 00325152 2012/06/13 ( CRUZ, BARBARA 500.00 AP~ 00325153 2012/06/13 ( D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 318.94 AP 00325154 2012/06/13 ( DAKTRONICS INC 114,495.19 AP 00325155 2012/06/13 ( DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 5,830.00 AP 00325156 2012/06/13 ( DEALER ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS 210.77 AP 00325157 2012/06/13 ( DELTA CARE USA 1,742.08 AP 00325158 2012/06/13 ( DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 224.00 AP 00325158 ~ 2012/06/13 ( DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2,467.00 AP 00325159 2012/06/13 ( DEVICES FOR LIFE LLC 1,466.06 AP 00325160 2012/06/13 1 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 188.56 AP 00325161 2012/06/13 1 DREAM SHAPERS 475.00 AP 00325162 2012/06/13 I DREAM SHAPERS 475.00 AP 00325163 2012/06/13 1 DURKEL, CAROL 53.28 AP 00325164 2012/06/13 1 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 2L33 AP 00325166 2012/06/13 1 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 70.00 AP 00325166 2012/06/13 1 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 940.00 AP 00325166 2012/06/13 1 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 460.00 AP 00325167 2012/06/13 ( EMBROIDME 34.48 AP 00325168 2012/06/13 ( EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 234.14 AP 00325168 2012/06/13 ( EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 167.72 AP 00325168 2012/06/13 ( EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY ~ 211.]0 AP 00325170 2012/06/13 ( FORTEX CONSTRUCTION INC 4,014.81 AP 00325170 2012/06/13 ( FORTEX CONSTRUCTION INC 5,085.19 Ap 00325170 2012/06/13 1 FORTEX CONSTRUCTION INC -401.48 AP 00325170 2012/06/13 1 FORTEX CONSTRUCTION INC -508.52 AP 00325171 2012/06/13 1 FOSS, RICHARD 15.00 AP 00325172 2012/06/13 1 FOWLER, MARCIA 950.00 AP 00325173 2012/06/13 1 GABEL, DWIGHT 500.00 AP 00325173 2012/06/13 1 GABEL, DWIGHT 40.00 AP 00325173 20]2/06/131 GABEL, DWIGHT 12.00 AP 00325174 2012/06/13 ( GAIL MATERIALS 1,049.66 AP 00325174 2012/06/13 ( GAIL MATERIALS 1,077.48 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 65 Current Date: 07/1 ]/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P122 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325176 2012/06/13 1 GARCIA, VICTORIA 49.70 AP 00325177 2012/06/131 GEOGRAPHICS 663.74 AP 00325177 2012/06/13 ( GEOGRAPHICS 1,151.58 AP 00325177 2012/06/13 ( GEOGRAPHICS 599.36 AP 00325178 2012/06/13 ( GEORGE CHEVROLET 51,321.42 AP 00325179 2012/06/131 GRAINGER 30.69 AP 00325180 2012/06/13 ( GRAVES & KING LLP 752.50 AP 00325181 2012/06/13 ( GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 249.53 AP 00325182 2012/06/13 l GURLEY, JAN 22.00 AP 00325183 2012/06/13 ( HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 94.20 AP 00325184 2012/06/13 ( HARBOUR, CAROL 964.00 AP 00325185 2012/06/13 ( HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 349.45 Ap 00325185 2012/06/13 ( HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 961.40 AP 00325186 2012/06/13 1 HOARD, BLAKE 3,000.00 AP 00325186 2012/06/13 ( HOARD, BLAKE 31.00 AP 00325187 2012/06/13 1 HOLLYWOOD RIDBON INDUSTRIES INC. 5,460.00 Ap 00325188 2012/06/13 1 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1,098.51 AP 00325188 2012/06/13 1 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 30.44 AP 00325189 2012/06/13 l HOSE MAN INC 105.30 AP 00325190 2012/06/13 1 HOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC. 9,430.68 AP 00325192 2012/06/13 ( HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 524.82 AP 00325192 2012/06/13 ( HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 12.49 Ap 00325192 2012/06/13 ( HSBC BUSD~IESS SOLUTIONS 143.10 AP 00325192 2012/06/13 ( HSBC BUSD~TESS SOLUTIONS 82.50 pp 00325192 2012/06/13 ( HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 200.12 AP 00325192 2012/06/13 ( HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 105.92 AP 00325192 2012/06/13 ( HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 159.73 AP 00325192 2012/06/13 ( HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 71.96 AP 00325192 2012/06/13 ( HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 5.50 AP 00325192 2012/06/13 ( HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 38.72 AP 00325193 2012/06/13 ( IMPETT, VICTORIA ANN 1,275.00 AP 00325193 2012/06/13 ( IMPETT, VICTORIA ANN 1,900.00 Ap 00325195 2012/06/13 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS - 18.44 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 24.15 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 216.17 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 10.62 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 41.08 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 f INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 12.68 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS_ 412.64 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 51.24 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 51.24 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 206.32 Ap 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 36.01 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 335.15 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 80.35 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 66 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P123 Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 60.99 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 55.52 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 187.81 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 66.06 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 249.16 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 9.07 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 4.08 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 108.48 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS _ 57.93 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 109.86 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 1,136.00 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 295.02 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 111.68 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 77.61 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 130.08 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 85.00 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 225.00 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 120.01 Ap 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 190.00 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 79.66 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 197.66 Ap 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 17.70 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 21.62 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 53.63 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 4.80 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 2.09 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 5.19 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 0.46 Ap 00325195 .2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 7.61 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 18.89 Ap 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 1.69 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 36.72 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -47.13 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 40.27 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 12.89 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 415.59 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 150.15 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 121.98 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 7.07 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 102.03 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 61.35 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 12.60 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 10.32 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 20.83 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 18.97 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 67 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P124 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 0.42 AP 00325195 2012/06/13 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 301.73 AP 00325196 2012/06/13 1 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATI01 2,272.50 AP 00325198 2012/06/13 l INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 133.64 AP 00325199 2012/06/13 f INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 52.50 AP 00325200 2012/06/13 ( IQVELOCITY C/O NEXBANK 3,000.00 AP 00325201 2012/06/13 ( JANA L SHEARER AND COVINGTON & CROWE L 12,450.00 AP 00325202 2012/06/13 ( KOA CORPORATION 854.94 AP 00325202 2012/06/13 ( KOA CORPORATION 1,994.85 AP 00325203 2012/06/13 ( KOLA 99.9 2,980.00 AP 00325205 2012/06/13 ( LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 20.00 AP 00325205 2012/06/13 ( LANCE~SOLL AND LUNGHARD 20.00 AP 00325205 2012/06/13 ( LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 20.00 AP 00325207 20!2/06/13 ( LINDEN, CYNTHIA 25.00 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 20.84 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 79.51 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 (. LOWES COMPANIES INC. 93.96 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 3.97 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 34.46 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 61.08 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 9.68 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 117.43 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 87.87 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 40.89 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. -38.36 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 20.35 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 27.73 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 46.05 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC.. 81.83 AP 0032521 ] 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 133.19 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 106.02 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 90.63 Ap 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 184.45 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 408.37 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 21.49 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 62.20 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 106.90 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 211.77 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 194.17 Ap 00325211 2012/06/13 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 64.23 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 30.69 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 121.04 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 16.07 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 25.42 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 29.05 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 68 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re>?ister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P125 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 36.51 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 67.88 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 62.78 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 14.49 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 14.74 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 51.90 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 371.37 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 I LOWES COMPANIES INC. 59.79 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 166.88 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 66.10 Ap 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 168.68 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 55.86 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 17.80 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 26.16 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 32.51 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 120.16 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. ~ 21.08 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 26.57 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 141.62 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 14.35 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 20.97 Ap 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 11.23 AP 00325211 ~ 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. ~ ~ 27.99 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 104.03 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. - 23.12 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 222.13 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 215.20 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 49.86 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 66.51 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 115.44 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 31.52 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 0.49 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 20.61 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 68.39 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 87.00 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 4.16 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 274.43 AP 00325211 2012/06/13 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 138.09 AP 00325212 2012/06/13 1 LUJAN, CHENOA 120.00 AP 00325214 2012/06/13 1 MAIN STREET SIGNS 1,259.81 AP 00325214 2012/06/13 1 MAIN STREET SIGNS 1,744.31 AP 00325215 2012/06/13 1 MANSFIELD GAS EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 499.92 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 1 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,988.67 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,111.08 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 12,197.13 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 69 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Curren[ Date: 07/11/: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re¢ister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P126 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00325216 2012/06/13 f MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 3,754.44 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,511.22 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 304.52 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 21,635.55 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 141.57 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 10,068.56 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,578.74 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 908.05 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 244.37 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 177.79 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 329.67 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 219.85 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 49.19 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 782.22 AP 00325216 2012/06/13 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 322.32 AP 00325217 2012/06/13 1 MCCALEB, ERIN 200.00 AP 00325218 2012/06/13 ( MEDINA, SANDRA 21.51 AP 00325219 2012/06/13 ( MIDWEST TAPE 64.98 AP 00325219 2012/06/13 ( MIDWEST TAPE 64.98 AP 00325219 2012/06/13 l MIDWEST TAPE 18.39 AP 00325219 2012/06/13 ( MIDWEST TAPE 50.97 AP 00325219 2012/06/13 ( MIDWEST TAPE 50.97 AP 00325219 2012/06/13 ( MIDWEST TAPE 11.19 AP 00325219 2012/06/13 1 MIDWEST TAPE 11.19 AP 00325219 2012/06/13 1 MIDWEST TAPE 76.14 AP 00325219 2012/06/13 ( MIDWEST TAPE 20.78 AP 00325219 2012/06/13 ( MIDWEST TAPE 10.39 AP 00325219 2012/06/13 ( MIDWEST TAPE 171.27 Ap 00325219 2012/06/13 ( MIDWEST TAPE 205.64 AP 00325220 2012/06/13 ( MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 34.00 AP 00325220 2012/06/13 l MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 34.00 AP 00325220 2012/06/13 1 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 34.00 AP 00325221 2012/06/13 ( MD.ANES, YIKCIA 550.00 AP 00325221 2012/06/13 1 MD.ANES, YIKCIA 575.00 AP 00325221 2012/06/13 ( MILANES, YIKCIA 100.00 AP 00325221 2012/06/13 ( MILANES, YIKCIA 125.00 Ap 00325221 2012/06/13 ( MD.ANES, YIKCIA 450.00 AP 00325221 2012/06/13 ( MILANES, YIKCIA 350.00 AP 00325222 2012/06/13 ( MMASC 75.00 AP 00325223 2012/06/13 ( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 198.09 AP 00325223 2012/06/13 ( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 86.70 AP 00325223 2012/06/13 ( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 77.88 AP 00325223 2012/06/13 l MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 80.21 AP 00325224 2012/06/13 ( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 913.56 AP 00325224 2012/06/13 ( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 554.91 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 70 Current Dale: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portiait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA F127 Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325224 2012/06/13 ( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 217.48 AP 00325224 2012/06/13 ( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 489.20 AP 00325224 2012/06/13 l MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 18.30 AP 00325225 2012/06/13 l NAPA AUTO PARTS 3.22 AP 00325225 2012/06/13 l NAPA AUTO PARTS 409.08 AP 00325225 2012/06/13 1 NAPA AUTO PARTS 122.68 AP 00325226 2012/06/13 1 NEAL T BAKER ENTERPRISES 5,000.00 AP 00325228 2012/06/13 1 NWOSU, LORETHA 31.08 AP 00325229 2012/06/13 1 ORACLE USA INC 7,411.82 AP 00325230 2012/06/13 1 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 21.12 Ap 00325231 2012/06/13 1 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 375.00 AP 00325231 2012/06/13 1 DRKIN PEST CONTROL 1,475.66 AP 00325232 2012/06/13 I PACIFIC COAST TOOL AND SUPPLY 2,392.74 AP 00325233 2012/06/13 1 PACIFIC GRAPHICS INC 17,927.00 AP 00325234 2012/06/13 t PAL CAMPAIGN 50.00 AP 00325235 2012/06/13 ( PATHFINDER CONSULTING 2,728.75 AP 00325236 2012/06/13 ( PATTON SALES CORD 20.43 AP 00325237 2012/06/13 f PENNY PLUMBING 198.23 AP 00325237 2012/06/13 ( PENNY PLUMBING 197.50 AP 00325237 2012/06/13 ( PENNY PLUMBING 197.50 AP 00325238 2012/06/13 ( PEREZ, DOMINICK 1,750.00 AP 00325239 2012/06/13 l PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 18.45 AP 00325239 2012/06/13 1 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 486.79 AP 00325241 2012/06/13 ( PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 1,287.00 AP 00325242 2012/06/13 1 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 143.46 AP 00325242 2012/06/13 ( PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 11.40 AP 00325243 2012/06/13 1 PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE 250.00 AP 00325244 2012/06/13 l PYRO SPECTACULARS INC ~ 15,000.00 AP 00325245 2012/06/13 1 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS 3,274.53 AP 00325245 20] 2/06/13 1 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS 3,274.53 Ap 00325247 2012/06/13 t RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I7; 50.00 AP 00325247 2012/06/13 l RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL Ii\ 50.00 AP 00325247 2012/06/13 ( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL 11; 50.00 AP 00325247 2012/06/13 ( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL Ir 50.00 AP 00325247 2012/06/13 ( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00325247 2012/06/13 l RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL Ir 50.00 AP 00325247 2012/06/13 l RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL 1N 50.00 Ap 00325247 2012/06/13 1 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I)\ 50.00 AP 00325247 2012/06/13 t RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I7; 50.00 AP 00325247 2012/06/13 f RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IK 50.00 AP 00325247 2012/06/13 1 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I)\ 50.00 AP 00325247 2012/06/13 f RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IK 50.00 AP 00325247 2012/06/13 ( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL Ii\ 50.00 AP 00325247 2012/06/13 ( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL it 50.00 AP 00325247 2012/06/13 ( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 25.00 User: VLOPEZ =VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 71 Curren[ Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P128 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325247 2012/06/13 1 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IK 25.00 Ap 00325247 2012/06/13 1 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IK 25.00 AP 00325248 2012/06/13 ( RBF CONSULTING 3,500.00 AP 00325248 2012/06/13 ( RBF CONSULTING 8,000.01 AP 00325249 ~ .2012/06/13 ( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 14.28 AP 00325250 2012/06/13 ( RCPFA 9,315.70 AP 00325251 2012/06/13 l RDO TRUST #80-5800 84.86 AP 00325252 2012/06/13 1 RECY-CAL SUPPLY LLC 1,928.73 AP 00325253 2012/06/13 l REPUBLIC ITS 461.80 AP 00325253 2012/06/13 ( REPUBLIC ITS 7,720.00 AP 00325254 2012/06/13 ( ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 344.65 AP 00325255 2012/06/13 ( ROBLES, RAUL P 135.00 AP 00325256 2012/06/13 ( ROGUE VALLEY QUAIL & FEEDER MICE INC 144.62 AP 00325257 2012/06/13 ( ROMERO, JOE - 10.00 AP 00325258 2012/06/13 ( SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT ~ 4,621.27 AP 00325259 2012/06/13 ( SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 623.40 Ap 00325260 2012/06/13 ( SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 957.22 AP 00325261 2012/061131 SBPEA 738.40 AP 00325262 2012/06/13 1 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 AP 00325263 2012/06/13 ( SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES - 397.34 AP 00325264 2012/06/13 1 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 18.70 AP 00325265 2012/06/13 1 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 255.00 AP 00325266 2012/06/13 1 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 186; 79 AP 00325267 2012/06/13 ( SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 30.51 AP 00325268 2012/06/13 1 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 25.00 AP 00325269 2012/06/13 1 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 60.00 AP 00325270 2012/06/13 ( SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES ~ 34.13 Ap 00325271 2012/06/13 1 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 39.44 AP 00325272 2012/06/13 ( SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 AP 00325274 2012/06/13 ( SIGN SHOP, THE 778.60 AP 00325275 2012/06/13 ( SMITH, SUSANNA 48.97 AP 00325276 2012/06/13 l SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES ~ 1,400.00 AP 00325276 2012/06/13 ( SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 650.00 AP 00325277 2012/06/13 l SOURCE GRAPHICS 212.16 Ap 00325277 2012/06/13 ( SOURCE GRAPHICS 54.86 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,258.62 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.44 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.40 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.00 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.04 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.59 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.09 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.88 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.18 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.64 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 72 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P129 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.80 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 379.71 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.43 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.07 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,122.74 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.91 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.94 pp 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.46 Ap 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.03 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.91 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.03 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.19 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.13 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 857.24 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.91 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.11 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.23 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.11 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 458.82 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.46 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.11 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.23 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.64 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.84 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.19 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.53 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.91 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.56 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.36 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.89 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.13 AP 00325280 20]2/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.10 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.64 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.11 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.93 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.26 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.1 l AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.23 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.85 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON . 24.23 Ap 00325280 2012/06/13 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.11 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.23 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.52 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.23 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 73 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 07/11 /: Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P130 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325280 2012/06/13 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,653.31 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.43 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.65 AP 00325280 20]2/06/131 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 24.23 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.36 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.23 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.15 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.66 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.55 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.72 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.48 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.23 Ap 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 396.23 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.91 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.56 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7,027.21 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.29 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.48 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.23 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.23 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.46 AP 00325280 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.36 Ap 00325280 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.04 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47,177.99 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24,622.74 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24,622.74 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17,636.05 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,383.91 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,930.01 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,416.35 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13,403.04 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,696.42 Ap 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.53 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.90 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,750.73 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11,165.62 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,890.31 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,830.04 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.28 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.23 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,413.16 AP 00325281 2012/06/13 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.47 AP 00325282 2012/06/13 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.67 AP 00325283 2012/06/13 ( SPECIALTIES DQC 358.00 AP 00325283 2012/06/13 ( SPECIALTIES INC 146.75 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 74 Current Date: 07/11G Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aeenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 P131 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00325285 2012/06/13 ( STERI-CLEAN LLC 540.00 AP 00325286 2012/06/13 l STERICYCLE INC 972.29 AP 00325286 2012/06/13 1 STERICYCLE INC 1,599.43 AP 00325287 2012/06/13 1 STOFA, JOSEPH 10.00 AP 00325288 2012/06/13 ( SUNBELT RENTALS INC 50.00 AP 00325289 2012/06/13 1 SUNNY EXPRESS INC 82.06 AP 00325291 2012/06/13 ( TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325291 2012/06/13 ( TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325291 2012/06/13 ( TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00325292 2012/06/13 ( THEATRICAL LIGHTING & SCENIC SERVICES LL 615.00 AP 00325293 2012/06/13 ( THOMPSON, KATHRYN 137.00 AP 00325294 2012/06/13 l TORGA ELECTRIC 2,700.00 AP 00325294 2012/06/13 l TORGA ELECTRIC ~ 100.00 AP 00325295 2012/06/13 1 TORRES, GERARDO 82.00 AP 00325296 2012/06/13 l TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC 124.94 AP 00325297 2012/06/13 1 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 31.30 Ap 00325297 2012/06/131 UNIFIRSTUIdIFORMSERVICE 765.03 AP 00325297 2012/06/13 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 109.88 AP 00325297 2012/06/13 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 23.96 AP 00325297 2012/06/13 ( UNIFIIiST UNIFORM SERVICE 31.30 AP 00325297 2012/06/13 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 852.41 AP 00325297 2012/06/13 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 109.88 AP 00325297 2012/06/13 ( UNIFDtST UNIFORM SERVICE 23.96 AP 00325298 2012/06/13 ( UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 813.13 AP 00325298 2012/06/13 ( UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 813.13 AP 00325298 2012/06/13 l UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 519.67 AP 00325298 2012/06/13 ( UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 519.67 AP 00325298 2012/06/13 1 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 519.67 AP 00325299 2012/06/13 1 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 217.78 AP 00325300 2012/06/13 l UNITED WAY 173.00 AP 00325300 2012/06/13 ( UNITED WAY 6.00 AP 00325301 2012/06/13 ( UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1,621.13 AP 00325302 2012/06/13 ( UPS 48.00 AP 00325303 2012/06/13 ( UTII.IQUEST 789.45 AP 00325303 2012/06/131 UTILIQUEST 1,066.45 AP 00325303 2012/06/131 UTILIQUEST 1,066.45 AP 00325304 2012/06/13 1 VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 715.46 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 77.18 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.65 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.14 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.65 AP 00325305 2012/06/131 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 79.02 AP 00325305 2012/06/131 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 3,152.67 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.42 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 39.45 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 75 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pt 32 Agenda Check Resister 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00325305 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 39.45 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.62 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 41.02 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.42 AP 00325305 2012/06/131 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 109.81 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.42 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.59 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.50 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 187.30 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 76.01 AP 00325305 -2012/06/13 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.42 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA ~ 18.14 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.59 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 t VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.59 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 374.95 AP 00325305 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 168.33 Ap 00325305 2012/06/13 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 5.01 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP 00325309 2012/06/131 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.17 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I- VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.17 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.17 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.17 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.17 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 15.54 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 17.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.17 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.17 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 26.68 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.17 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VER[ZON WIRELESS - LA 69.67 Ap 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 49.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS ~- LA 47.56 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.26 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 77.34 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA ~ 44.99 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 4.24 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.01 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 Ap 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 33.30 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 76 Current Date: 07/11/: Report'. CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P133 Agenda Check Resister 6/13/20]2 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.82 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.99 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 21.25 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA ~ 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l . VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 68.76 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.17 AP 00325309 2012/06/]3 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.17 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 19.14 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 1.17 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.17 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.t7 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 19.14 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.52 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP ~ 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/]3 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 81:02 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/131 VERIZONWIRELESS-LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.85 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.17 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53. AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 280.96 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.81 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 57.97 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 73.87 AP 00325309 20]2/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.02 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 77 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P134 Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.02 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.06 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 64.44 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.02 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.02 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.73 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.14 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.65 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.77 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 43.52 AP 00325356 2012/061201 ARNOLD F[ELDS PAINTING 1,800.00 AP 00325356 2012/06/20 ( ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 750.00 AP 00325355 2012/06/20 ( ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 6,682.50 AP 00325354 2012/06/20 ( ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 721.93 AP 00325353 2012/06/20 ( ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP 00325353 2012/06/201 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP 00325352 2012/06/20 ( ANDRONICOS, JOANN 120.00 AP 00325351 2012/06/20 ( AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE IE 50.00 AP 00325832 2012/07/02 ( CRUZ, KOLETT R. 2,249.66 AP 00325366 2012/06/20 l BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 1,013.76 AP 00325366 2012/06/20 ( BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 2,040.65 AP 00325365 2012/06/20 ( BIERMAN, V. MICHELLE 250.00 AP 00325363 2012/06/20 l BARNES AND NOBLE 101.50 AP 00325363 2012/06/20 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 103.26 AP 00325363 2012/06/20 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 228.00 AP 00325363 2012/06/20 ( BARNES AND NOBLE 293.35 AP 00325362 2012/06/20 ( BALDY FIRE AND SAFETY 229.46 AP 00325361 2012/06/20 ( B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 47.52 AP 00325379 2012/06/20 ( CONCEPT POWDER COATING 820.00 AP 00325378 2012/06/20 ( CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 4,846.60 AP 00325377 2012/06/20 ( CHHAVY, KIM 5.00 AP 00325376 2012/06/20 ( CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 109.99 AP 00325375 2012/06/20 ( CDW-G 843.26 AP 00325375 2012/06/20 f CDW-G 786.13 AP 00325375 2012/06/20 ( CDW-G 350.93 AP 00325375 2012/06/20 ( CDW-G 4,709.46 AP 00325374 2012/06/20 ( CASTREJON, DONNA 36.08 AP 00325374 2012/06/20 ( CASTREJON, DONNA 102.12 AP 00325373 2012/06/20 ( CASCADE TURF LLC 30.42 AP 00325373 2012/06/20 ( CASCADE TURF LLC 107.45 AP 00325370 2012/06/20 ( WOOLFOLK, CARMEN 986.10 AP 00325369 2012/06/20 ( CAPITOL BUILDERS HARDWARE INC. 2,601.45 AP 00325368 2012/06/20 ( CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 1,135.00 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 78 Current Date: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P135 Asenda Check Resister 6/]3/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum pp 00325367 2012/06/201 BREMER WHYTE BROWN & O'MEARA I,LP 2,483.77 AP 00325366 2012/06/20 I BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 23.00 AP 00325366 2012/06/20 l BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 2,067.69 AP 00325366 2012/06/20 I BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 18.00 AP 00325366 2012/06/20 I BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 163.47 AP 00325366 2012/06/20 f BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 27.04 AP 00325360 2012/06/20 ( AUTO RESTORATORS INC 4,523.89 AP 00325359 2012/06/20 ( AUSTIN POWER PONG 105.00 AP 00325358 2012/06/20 ( ASCE 50.00 AP 00325357 2012/06/20 ( ASAP POWERSPORTS 240.00 AP 00325357 2012/06/20 ( ASAP POWERSPORTS 530.93 AP 00325357 2012/06/201 ASAP POWERSPORTS 446.98 AP 00325357 2012/06/201 ASAP POWERSPORTS 260.80 AP 00325356 2012/06/201 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 1,500.00 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 51.85 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.11 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.19 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.82 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 pP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 32.92 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.45 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 101.47 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 65.01 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 33.00 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 3.39 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 82.31 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 61.62 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 82.08 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 47.97 AP 00325309 2012/06/]3 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 25.03 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.55 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 77.54 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 34.31 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.53 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.69 AP 00325309 2012/06/13 ( VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5.38 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 79 Current Date: 07/11/: Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout ~ Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -00325309 2012/06/13 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 00325309 2012/06/131 00325309 2012/06/131 00325310 2012/06/131 00325311 2012/06/131 00325312 2012/06/131 00325312 2012/06/131 00325312 2012/06/131 00325312 2012/06/13( 00325312 2012/06/13[ 00325312 2012/06/131 00325312 2012/06/131 00325313 2012/06/131 00325314 2012/06/13( 00325314 00325315 00325315 00325316 00325317 00325318 00325319 00325319 00325320 00325321 00325322 00325323 00325324 00325325 00002605 00002605 00002606 00002607 00002608 00002609 00002611 00002612 00002612 00002663 00002663 00002664 00002666 2012/06/13( 2012/06/13( 2012/06/131 2012/06/131 2012/06/13 1 2012/06/131 2012/06/131 2012/06/131 2012/06/131 2012/06/131 2012/06/131 2012/06/131 2012/06/131 2012/06/13( 2012/06/13( 2012/06/13 2012/06/13( 2012/06/13( 2012/06/13( 2012/06/13( 2012/06/20 2012/06/201 2012/06/201 2012/06/27 2012/06/271 2012/06/271 2012/07/03 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO VISION SERVICE PLAN CA VISTA PAINT VISTA PAINT VISTA PAINT VISTA PAINT VISTA PAINT VISTA PAINT VISTA PAINT WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WESCO RECEIVABLES CORD WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY WEST, CARLA WESTERN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC WHITEHEAD, LINDA WILSON AND BELL WONG, SAU MEI MAY XRI YOUNG,EDWARD ZFX INC CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMO7 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMO] CITIGROUP ENERGY INC RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SEMPRA GENERATION SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMOI CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMOt VIASYN INC MACDONALD, JAMIE P136 Amoum 39.14 50.16 36.53 37.13 36.82 -1.25 -0.06 270.04 10,916.16 119.17 32.94 27.94 182.46 27.94 154.49 27.94 686.91 306.61 390.16 1,227.09 1,422.30 40.08 14.10 75.36 -139.64 237.69 63.27 75.00 20.00 5,000.00 52.00 4,525.00 6,994.26 7,025.00 72,065.00 5,807.00 1,750.00 168,073.60 245.64 99,105.90 107,048.64 1,555.00 7,025.00 3,137.00 520.00 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 80 Curren[ Dale: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P137 Agenda Check Register 6/13/2012 through 7/10/2012 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum EP 00002666 2012/07/03 ( MACDONALD, JAMIE 94.35 To[al for Entity: 4,910,110.18 User: VLOPEZ -VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 81 Curren[ Dale: 07/11/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:0 P738 m 0 E U L U K O T U 01 C +" C~ C G V N ~ N 7 ~ (~ C ~ N 0 ~ ~ Q V ~ ~ M C C .O c ~~~~ 0 o a° ~. a E=Z \ -i V ~> m~ e o c c o w ni ~ o b rl > m m ~ F ~ ni o) N ' f Y c o ~ ni o 0 M E ' ' N ~ .~ GGG O W ~ ~? m O1 og r O ~ ~~ a° o ~ m W m < N n m I r e N O V O m m m o N A ~ O I~ m N b m N M ~ m n ai n e _ ~ o ~n ~ nJ N N p r n m m n m r m r A N r m m M 1+! r n r d d n b O ~ m r N ~ ~ ` M t p O i g w N c M ~ r ai ~~ 1~ m N N N m m m N m N O N ^ N N W Nl N N M ~ ~ O ' ~ m W N O O j h o o ^ m yl d jp 0 O O O O O ~ ~ '1 0 N O 1~ M Ct O N m o ° a ~ . n N N r of ~ rv ~ P Q ~c a w c ac 1LL U E N N ~ a ~i o c ~ m ry w o m m a ~ j ~ LL ~ C N N N d N o L a m u c ~ ~ ~ a > y ~ m c ~ CN U ~ S. d C Q vc N A Ury ~ N A ~°o u d m U ` O t Nc N ly O U J O U aEQ rn ~ 9 C m E ~y o dm a n E m a c m c a R ~ ry L N > C a T O =' E ) a o y o L c ~~ ~ d ` E w o N r C ~ '~ °- _ c m 5 ° ° x m o. Oa v ~ M n~ L F 1 ~ Q E ' T Q y U_ d N O M < m o$ d ~ N N C y ~ E N 7 ~ m ~ ~' ~ n c m ly m U ~ v O d ~ v U U ~ - T v ~ r ~ e n ~ c C ~ .n al a to o y v ^' = ° m m ~ E 3 v a N N ~ O OJ C _ m O ~ N m U ~ c ~ ~ ~ a C Y U m m ~ L y m C O o w E a _> o ~° N n m ; ~ .L_. \ L a O _ O ~ m m C m m n N !` e ~wrn `m' 1 O) C7 10 M V N d d U E L Ul O V ~ m E O ~ Q <v m mm c ~ m vi O) vi O O Ip m ^. ~ a o LL o~° 5 °o ~ I j 3 w m m U w m =cam v E m- d m N ~ d L ~' d H ry C m y.: `w -a ac c ~ T m - c m d U w m r q m ~ N O ~ a" U E m~ o ° u ~ " Z' d t ~~ a m K a' - al E m ` m ~ m O A m fn .. 1 ?~ N r N p c N N ~ _ > m ~ a E d Y 0 N 3 L N c ^' 1` i " w :~` C m 10 E > ~ ~ E m a t ' U a w _ ¢> o ~m >an~, r¢~ U m o a > o ig ~ ~ m O a ¢ a ~ d N N M 4 O o m m M o O N 6 ~ Ol `- C o Y o n d ~ ~ P139 a C O C Cd Y N ~ y V d > r ~ ~ C O U ~ w O N N O t ~ - M C O y C ~~°~ ,~ o ~• a° ~ v a° ~, rd m m m m m m m m m N M m v> Q m m n m r m r ~ Q Q ~ m m m m n n m 'C d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ Q n m. n 9 G N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~V N N N N N ~V N N N N . W < < M m m V Q A Q m' 01 m n f0 m f~ ' m' n O fD Q m f~ O n U N O O O ~V _ ~~ O N N N N_ ~_ N N N O O O_ N ` t` O ~V N N~ ~ b ~ ~ O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ O a ~ 0 0 y y 0 0 0 0 0 ~pp ~ 0 0 0 ~~' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d Y ~ Q l g ~'~ n W O n n O W m ~ m N p b w m Q w m ~ m n m Q O Q m C m O n ~ ~ d m Q m Q m m n w w W m m m Q Q N w W m m O O n m m m m m mm m W O 6 LL' N ~ N N m w m m m m m ~ Q m W N n m m m n O m m m m N Q N m ~ n n Q d ^~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a m m m O m o m o o n o m N m w o 0 0 0 0 0 o m o m n o 0 0 0 0 ~ N o f0 {7 m m O b m m m m m ~ m n n m Q Q Q O n N m m N N N O m m O O O m m m O O m N O N m' W m Q W O n m O n n N N O O O n' W O O O O N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J O m N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~" 0 0 ~ ~ ~ r' O ~ ~ N 8 E m O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o m o 'o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a y m G O O N N n n n O f O N N O O O O O b N' w m m O n 10 O ~'' O m m m m n m Q Q N m O m n m m m N O N m m n n N N O b 19 O N N E e' ~ ~ ~- ~ O m N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ N m d N N N m m Q O O O O m ~ O N O O O O O O O N O O N O O O O O w n O ~ n n w O m w Q O O N O O m n O O O O O O O N O O n O O O O O Q O W W Q m m m Q O O w O m m m W O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O O Q N O r n m o o W N o o n o m m n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 o m o 0 Y ~ m w m W m W O Q n W W O O m m O m O N_ O 0 o Q w O W w n O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O m O O O O O m O O O O O O n O m W O O d m m W W w w w w o 0 w W w o 0 0 0 o N o W m o W m m o 0 o w m w o w w O w w o m m m m u IH w m Q w w m ~ ~ w m o Q ~ m 0 0 o N m m w e e ~ N ~ o 0 0 N N m 0 o m Q N w w O O N m o o Q N N m Q m O m N N O Q d N m O O O O O' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ n n O O O O O O O O O O m N O O O O O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O q w W N m N N m N m N N m Y n W N N O m N O m m N m O N O b m O m O m n m n m m N N y W Q f0 W m O N m n n m p O W fD n 0 m N N N N n m N w w N N N w N w m' N N O m m m m O m m Q W m m N N n N W n N ~(p y p y ~ ~ m q i p b m O I N O O O m O O O O O N N t O e~ O O O N l A O O O b S O O O O W N m f'! Q m N N m ~ m N N m N N ~ N N N m Q N m N Q Q m N N Q m O Q N N Q O d m N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ n n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O w o W W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > n m n m o o 0 0 0 o m o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 w o 0 0 0 0 0 o w 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o 0 0 q w m O O O O O O m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p m m o O O O O o 0 0 0 o O O o 0 o O O O o 0 0 o O o O O o O o 0 0 b m O m O O O N O O O O O m N O O O O O m O O O O O N O O O O O O 1A m 01 O m N N m ~- m N m m N N ~ N N N m.Y N Q m N Q m N m Q m O Q m N Q Q d d W W O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N m 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N f ~ ~ r ~- f f N f f ~ q d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O t G N N ~V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N~ N N N ~Y Y t~ m fp m P P r p m m w N n 10 N N m 10 ' n f n O f0 Q w Ct O n 7 O ~ O N _ ~ " O N O N ~ O ~ N N ~ N N 0 ~ 0 0 O ~ m O N N N 1` N a (7 m IO 0 O r ~ b (~ O f7` 0 r ~~ l V Q Q fd 10 m o o s f~ r f~ m N m m 0 0 0 ~ ~ .- o 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 o m m o o w ~ a a a i e a i a a X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m r U U U U U U U U U m Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y C7 U' O O U' O V' U' U' ^ ~y Z Z Z Z 2 Z 2 2 2 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y r~ ~' ~' ~~ ~~~ - z a ¢¢ aa QQ Q ~ a s Q QQ QQ z Z Z z Z Z z z z z z z z S 2 2 S S 2 2 2 ~ z O r6 m m m m m m m a a a a a a a a s rt c~ a O O O O O O O O O r ~- t t ~~~ r t m mmm mmm m m E~~~ E E ~~~ y N 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ O Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Z Z z 2 Z z 2 Z Z a W W W W W W W W W a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Q a a a a a a 0 ¢ ¢¢ K K¢ K rc rc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F i U U U U U U U U U y ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ~ U d K K K K K K K m m t` E E E E~~ ~~~ E~~ ~~~~ E~ ~~~ H m z m a aaa aaa aao ooo o00 000 000 0000oo ooo a ~ W ~ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL S S S S S 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 S S S S S S S S S Z d m O J d a QJQ K QJQ QJQ QJQ K K C QJQ QJQ QJQ K¢ K JQa QJQ QJ¢ C K K QJQ QJQ QJQ K K K QJQ QJQ QJQ C C K QJ QJ JQ K K K QJ QJ QJ K K K QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ K K K K K K QJQ QJ¢ QJQ K K C QJQ K a 9 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W U c ^ p p p p p p p 0^ 0 0^ ^^ 0 ^ 0^ O^ 0 0 0 0^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ J q l + LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL ! nv J C ~ ~ b 0 o E LL U m O O n n W O p n m N m O m w w N O m w m N m m N N m W O w m m m O m m 0 0 0 ~` m ~ m Q m Q n ~ m m m W W O N m O O O N n C O m ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~° ° ~ ~ ~ ~ m C ~ e - . - ~J ~ ~ ~ > N o C T O rv T O d ~ a Z Z j O O N m ~ Y 3 U S J X O K _ W m Y m m m m m a LL S O Z] 6 ~ N W W O O Q o O a a 0 c7 z m LL> a Q S J LL LL U m Y d Z U X Q W LL ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 q ° ~ (7 O O Y Y Y Y Y¢Q N W X >} N X X n m m m n n n m m m n n n m m W n n n l l ¢¢ N N m m W O V' O U' U' f ] C7 O O K LL m m O O N d y m ~ m m m m m ~ ~ ~ m m m m m m ~ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m n Q Q~~~ m m m ~ Q Q m m m m G p Y m m m ` U J N LL m m m m m m m ~n ro of n m of m n n ei of oS n M M n n i+i n M M n n io M N m a m m n n n m n in N 3~ N N N N N N N N N d _ N Q a _ N ~ m o a o O N o m N o ~ o ~~ E Z' z n 1O o Q d ~ v i m P fD fD i N e e n n Y m n n N' e m q i F. O O O O m N ^ O GI O rr O O N O O N N n m P m N N N n N n m N ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ N A N N N N N N d R ` I Q y Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q f8 O O O O O 1n O O O m m N N K O O m m O ( V n ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ C N d O O O O< O n O tD N ~ O O O O Y O O O m N q O O O O V O t0 O [O O ~ O O O O m O N O N I Y O O O O m O N O Id N 8 0 0 0 N 0 of o ~ o o r m O O N N id O W O m ~ N O O O m Y N O a 0 W C d O ~ E °' v m >~ ~ ~ c o V C ' N a O L6 N O t ~ - M d C O C ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ 0 0 m Aa ~,a o ?o U a a dd ~u Lo c > A Qm c m i C J U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O r f0 N 0 0 0 N T m N Q m ~ [0`! Omi N T m ~ ~ V O O~ O N a m N ~ W ~ OI O 0 0 D o w o m o N N m m N V N m N °°°°°°°°° °°°°°°°°° 000000000 O O o ° ° ° o ° ° ° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O O N N N m N N N O N N N N° N N N N N N m Q~ O N m N ~ O a O O O O O O O 0 N N 0 m m N N Nm IV Q N N M !p1 O O 0 0 P V m N N N 0 0 O po N N W 01 t0 pb N YI N N 0 0 o ° 0 0 ° o N N N N O pN O 0 1- r U K u N_ o O N K F Q U x z e ~ > w Z a ~ w _ 9 O tl) m m 0 O O N r 0 a a 0 M K ~! m d Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z h 41 41 N N f/J 41 fA Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w J J J J J J J J~ i m w w w w w w w w~ a w w w w w w w w K d LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL F- O C ~ O W a 0 U m m m a ~o n rn m o M O O Q N ~°ll N N f p m N T C d Q m Oo nm ° `° ¢ > > ¢ n ~ ~ ~ nr 0 0 0 ~ LL ~ ~ LL l~L ~ ~ ~ N y m m N tO m N t0 V) m m LL m m m m m m m m m P N V C O m ~ 3 u vOi N O ~ S e m T r bn A N n m m N n m W m 3 m m e m 0 n :L N a a m 9 O f P140 Q fV U 0 o °i ~ rc a° 1 m 0 N 0 C 0 O P141 d ~ rn U a c ~ _ a .°. ,~ m o i ~ a ~,' ~ m °' o u a s o a o N O ~ ~ d T a d p S a a~ d d o N ~ p: O N d ~ < m ~ b M Y m N ~ ' ~ m N - N N A r ~ 0 j m m t0 O 1 ~ N Opi ` r N (~ W ~ N 0 m G +~ L O C y ~ d ~ U U d ~ ~ ~ N 1 O~ y 0 > m n (~ O r a `v O {a r O" L~ Nay a u i - d `° n m ~ ~ ' O O C C a // /~ ii ~ ~ ' ~•+ d N LL p ° ° d rd d d a ~ t° ~~ V ~ a ~o a ~ a dd Old o o m m q O d Q m V! O S z m O LL J Q U LL Q d H~ ~ Y Z c d N w a a m Z d A ~ `d a Q d ~ yMMM C d V d E O ~ t°. m Q °m ~ _ N ~ °o d °i c m m u N N N_ a ~ o m o a c S _ H U ! N f9 N O P142 N ~ a 41 01 n n (.~ M a ° ~> O al n ~ rc a ? rc a N N O W W u n N o m b N n W O O r q NI N W n m W n O W b N b O N N N V W N d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O d 3 O O O O O O O O O O O O N O N O O O O O N !!~~ O O O O O O O O f N O O O N d~ ~ E a O o O 0 O W V O O O o ai ~c o 0 o m 1+) ri O O o 0 O o N ri ~ - dL O O O 0 W O O O Of W O O O N N~ N N O W 01 N N N W O O O b Q: ~ 01 ~ W r N N N m N m C ~ m N W W C d d~ o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O m NI O o O m d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W W O O O W N d p d o c d o 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r ~ V O O O O O O N O O O O~ O O O N W m O m O W W O d O O O O N O O N O O N N ^ ~ a 0 m 0 m 0 0 W o o o w o o o W N b a ~ n ~ o h V N~ C ~ O N N O N V O ~ ~"~ ~ d ~ 7 3 ~ T ~ ~ U C m O t O 3 Z ~~ O C~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N • ~ D d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O ~ Y N^ N ~ N 0 N N 1 n 10 f0 l7 m 0 0 b N y N C ~ ~ N N N N O O r i i i i O N i i N O ii ~ V ~ ` b t0 b t0 D b 0 N 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O D D O O 10 fD O O W Q O O N O m o 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T w ~L r r ~ d [O m ^ 0 0 0 O n N ' OI O N O W O m W fD N N n n O N O O O O T JJ ~ O N N N O N ~ O ~ ~ O O N V C N 3 a rc O U h ^ 2 2 2 Z Y Y Y Y Y~ g O m Z Q Q Q Q Z Z Z Z Z~ Z Z Z Z LL H H F F m m m m m O U ~ y N U Z F ^^^^ Z Z Z Z Z Z Q Q LL H O ~ W W W W Q Q Q Q Q Q O O J Z ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ Z. U w m ~ U U U U www www ~ ~ ¢ z r r W E LL p > w a ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 0 0 o Q Q y Y g w U 9 E Q Q Q Q E E U a J J J J J J J J J J J J ~ (n Q ~ F ^ y F ~ Q O Q Q Q Q a a Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q K K K K K K K K K K Q QQ Q K K N L` N N N N ` T Q N W W W W W W W W W W W W L Z LL w ~ U ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ O ^ ^ ^ O W J d L O W W W W W W W W W W W W ~ Z ~ Q ~ C J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL g ~ U K O _' C C it O O e c a ~ d > > ~ LL y o U U Q ° C N m m v o ~ H m W n~ W o e e v E °o N ~ .p- C N r ~ ~ N N O Y N ~ °o O d N C ~ > ~ A N ~ C U ~ C d '" T C ~ O o O W m C C W Q _ n N L C c O W N f0 Y J J W d X F U Q N m > ( O O Y K O R N > W W . J O ¢ K O m a n n n W M M M M M p e N C h o N U N D i i e i ~ ~ ~° 0 ~ O > d m m m m m m m m m m e~ ip Y ~ ~ m~ ~ U J N LL n m in of of M m m m m m m N N i n ~ P743 m ~ g~ N N w n m m m m r r O O N N O N N r ~ m m m m v o r ~ n N m~° m e ~ v v i°n $ e m ~ m u i N N r ~ w n_ r_ m m r, r a m m o rv r a r of O N r n v o n n (upi n o+ ~ U j N N N m N S ~ W W w W W W t9 w M w w O ~ ~° o D o p e eQ ~ O O~ O~~ O I % O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 > o o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d o ~, ¢ a a a¢ a g g a a a¢ ¢ a a ' a a g g g g ' ' ~ 3z 'z 3 3 'z z z z z z 'z zz z z z z z z z f d q r r n d1 OI W O O N N N N O O O N N N O g S N N N N NO N S O O O 00 O t W m O m~ 0) m O m O ~ O+ O m C `1 ~ V ~ `! a m m M I 10 m m m ~ 0 W W c t (3 t3 p O W P Q Q ' •- •- C~ I~ n n m `l ( V ~ ~ N V { V [ V { 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m ~ (O N N O n o O _ O . q~~~ ~ d Q a n a a n 00000 u N zrzzz d y N y N N % O jy N ~ D D D N g N q N L D V O D V V V 9 D 9 O O C C q q 7 J %~~%~ C C C C C C C C C C C 7 J J J J J L L C C b' j J LL LL LL ~' F f' ~~ J LL J J 7 LL LL LL J J J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL ' c d ~ d c c c c c ~ `~ y Y m `d ' ` a x y ' u Y v w v m " 'Z` ` ` ~ 6 Y! d i ` i ` ~ ~ ~ . . ~L' i i i v ~ ~ q C C q q q C C d d q N N q N N q g N N q q q O q l ~ `2 ~ d d d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ v E 9 T T ~ v Q Q Q Q Q T T T T T T T d N N T >~ T T T >. d a d d d d V q y ___ _ " d C N d d C C C C C C C C C C C L 1 C C O O O ~%%%~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O~ C W ~ ~ ~ LL LL LL li LL ~ E ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ `G ~ ~ E N ' C C G O O C L ~ LL ~ = j C C J j C~ y j U C J (~ ( ~ C D C 9 J j LL C 9 j LL j lL p eOj LL p O N O t~ LL C LL LL LL t LL O IL ll F a ~ C y p' a s LL q O 6 N d~ 1- Q 1- a f l y d N q ° a~'i Bi ~ °w m u n n :! c n d~ ` ~ a i o o v ` m E~~ m m~¢ o: N N E o. N 5 a N¢ a U E a O c o 0 0 0 0 ~ o d m m ~ rn m N a LL LL LL LL N LL y q N q N _ N y C, 2 q 3 3 3 3 ~ 3 F o. v o d u q _ c _A n E d - 9 y LL t _ d ~ E J ~ C ° = N m n h . q E o v a ~ r1i O E q m ~ co m d '~ °o K C m W LL' W LL m N > m N m Q ^ ~ `? W m m' ~O j} u q m U h m °' O N p Z n ~ m m Z Z N~ ~ a m O o U ~ o U a U U N N X ~ ~ C O ~ d ~ E C d OI Q A U N LL N E c v Q l1 T C >U >_ W U Z Z m a P144 M m m C'1 O O O O) m O~ CJ 1~ ro m O O N N O, V W O Ot W A O m LLl N I` 1~ ' O O N ° N ° ~ ~ N~ O N W W QQ O O tV O gg ~ lM ~ ~ ~ M m m o o ~ n i7ie ro~ 3 m m e m $ a pd p d ~~ n m `° m m w~ N N V N N N O A . U ~ W IR M w Vi M 1A 19 w I S S O S S S O O O O O O O O O S O T O O O 00 O O O O C O O C O G O O O O O O O O O O f a a a a a ` g a a a a a a ' a a a a a g a ' a a a a a ' ' o z zz 3 3 z z z z z z z 3 z z z z z z z z z z z b q S S o e~ O O O S S N 0 S S S '8 '8 O O O N p m m m m m m m O O O C J O O O m m m m m O O O O O `b O O b m m I t q ° S~SCC ~ rvSS C~C~ C CCCC l`+ L`~~ CCCCC a aaa~ ~ aaamm ~ mmmm~~~ m~mm~ c a a u N c N O b IL N C (, 9 O 9 D O V 'C V D 9 V 'O 'O L V V V D O V D V 'O 9 q q C C C C C C C C C C ' ' ' C C C C C C C C C C F C OI $ t q J J J J J LL LL LL LL LL LL J J J J J LL LL LL LL LL J LL J J J J J J J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL J J~~ J J LL LL LL LL,LL 0 3 M = a a v v `u g q u m m v y w y m m `b `m E 1~/ N Y Y '~ 'C ~ x x z i le ~ x x '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ YE Y q C C g q q q q N g q q q q q g q q q q q q g q q q q J Cb > ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~i E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ U (, 9 T T T T u b g b b c c c c c v c T T m N N b b c c c c c m c T T T T T T m b b N b b b c c c c c c c T T T T T b b b b m c c c c c ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c C W ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `2 E E ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q 9 Z ~ C C - Qi OI C 0 q q b c C J O 9 9 .~' n f q b E q D .. .b °c ~ v D C °c ~ o'ci ~ ~ LL LL C v ~ LL C U Ut. = c J C C U LL D J? Q b O.' j C C J ~y D J? ~ d' C J C J LL O O~ ~ ~ O C J j ~ LL V ~ LL ' J O% N 3 m ~ m i C } S( N ~ U N a~ C U U p N ~ ~` q b b LL C a H ~ a H a l ( V- O a H U a LL ~ d U a f a LL b F a d E U a b m q~ N 0. ' N ' b jp N Z,N N 6 ' ~ q ~ q q_ 2 O u A N 6 ~ ~ b ~ q_ Z N ~j' 6 ~ ~ j u N~ L U N N C U N V b J d 6 b N U N u y y C ~ d 6 Ei N> W d C G b C ~~ '~ S N y¢¢ E a y P W N K 5 c ti W ~ $' ¢ i ? a b y~¢ ` a a y c a a e m a b m ~ m m m q a „ IL N LL IL LL y C _ N ~ N N N _ 2 F a 3 3 3 3 3 3 c ~ b ~ u u Y 0_' q q q m q a N a b Q Q b b m ~ o' o o b °' . c t t j U o 0 ~ ~ m' '° `° ~ ~ E E N N O O O O S O O O N O N O N N O N O N Z Z Z 2 Z Z O ~ ° ° O O ° LL LL LL LL LL LL U U U U U U N N X ~ ~ C O ~ d ~ E E N C d m Q N LL N E N c m Q LL a N W U Z Q Z LL m a P745 l ~ m Q V P Q~ S O m ~ W W O r W V Q O V f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ m N N O r O (O ~ N O O N O N < m m OI m N N mm Q N m O r to O N N 1"1 m o in ~n N N Ip 1p 1 1 P pp m Oi V N Q IG " I d ~ 0 0 m O~ n M N VN W p ql N (~ U ) w w w w w w w w w w w w w w .n w 9 o e a° ~ e a° e a ae e e a~ a a° ~~~ e ~ e e o o a o~ e I °' °o °o °o ~ o 0 0 0 0~ g o g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~, m a g g g a g a a a a a a a a a a a g a a a a a a¢ a¢ a ,~ o z z z z z z z z z z z z z z' z 'z i z z z z z z z i z z z f N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ v C CCCCCC C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C ? p m m m m m m~ m m m m m e e m m~ m in M ~ ~n m m m~~ N N N N a m w m m m w m w m m m m m m ~ n i~ n n n n .= .= .= .= 9 c m a U N C N O O jL N € y y 9 9 9 O 9 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 rn t= ~ C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O;~ C LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL V W W L y N N W N d W W V W N N N W N W N y y0. s x stx x C N N N N R N R N N N N N N N N N N N N t0 N 10 10 N R N N R J d l ~ ~ cl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cG °G cC U r 9 T T T T T T T T >, T T T T T T T T T T T T T T Z N O v N N v d N N N W W N L N N N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C V W E E ~ ~ `t E ~ E ~ ~ ~ E f ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ c m 9 m q c °c ~ ~ ~ v c g v u' °c LL v = 9 ~ a U U .tb. Z C d LL 'c °c ~] G C C U d > > c~ c> j e~ a `o `o ~ LL ~ a` o~ LL~ c x~ a` W§ °~ ~ W~ G ~ 8 `~ ~ LL 8 LL~ `~ r LL p N LL d a O N IL ryry 4 a N N LL O J V a LL C V N a 10 V ~~ 4 a a W 6 ~ W 6 W a N 1- 1- N O. LL a N ~ O a F- a~ N v V c~ E rv 2 O G~ o. m rv 2 E Ti ~ a 2 ;~? u !9 a p E a u v rv c v '6 v N d m 'u u v v v d'II v J c u d 'v ,`m v w> v E G 'p > E c v c m v v v v G = O N N Oi ~ 9 C N ~ v 9~ 'C a~~ 'e - G d er m a '~+ m¢^ a 5¢ o. ¢ rn tt~ a E LL cn vi K K a~ a ¢¢ a m E a 3 a e o 0 0 0 0 i v m m ~ m m yA a IL V N N LL y C ~ ~ 2 a i 3 i ~ 3 a v ~ ~ d ~n m m it # it w N N W N W N O a a~ a ~ > O " E E E w ~ n o v 9 >o o >o ~ ~ c m E E E ~ j o q q o 0 °m °O °o ~ o N N ry N ry Z Z Z Z Z ^ ^ ^ O O U U U U U m N % ~- C ~ 6 ~ d ~ E E E N c N m Q m IL N E c v Q m N LL a C N W U Z a Z LL m a" P146 e d N N u N O LL N q ~ t O ; M u ~ ~ ~ C ~ U L y ~ i c c 5 w ~ c § p ~ O L ~' U u p u O p r w E E N N o o m o 0 o m m ~n n o e o n o 0 o M ~n n n O ~ O N O O O n V t~f th n M ~i Nn n n r .= of ci ei m rn m M V j ~ - W IA w a o e~ o pa° o >° o m O O o O O o o O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~, :: a a a a a a a ~ o 'z 'z 'z zz 'z z 'z d n p n n n n n n p n L~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` al ~"C CCCCCC N VI VI N N N N a' ~ C CCCCCC C CI d °c ° °c ° °c °c c m J J O>> O O ~ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL ~ N N W N N N N N ~ x ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u u v m m v u v C C C C C C C C ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E a 0 ~ E v LL °c 2 j C~ O C~ LL iy V ~ 'ppyJp8 C Jp3 C F LL p¢ y~ Q H O u _ T ~ N L N U O N Np a U N~ N N` 'C '~' d m N K Q Q U= d t c ~ d m A Q N d - C 3 N F a 0 m m 5 0 v ~ N p P 9 ~ c '~ m E N O O O N O Z O LL U /+ N X ~ ~ C 6 ~ N ~ r E N C N OI Q f0 N N E d m Q N lL v v W U Z 6 Z LL N a N m qE U U L U O ~..~ U N d a+ C - C~C G a a~ ~ a 0 ~ C 7 N O 1E (/1 p ~ ~ °- M d ~~~` o C ~ ~ O a .~ a° V =Z U~ !~~ -~ U V N f > Q W O b O ~' T ~ p f O ~ O a Y d m ~ dd A E Nolen ~ ~ N d d o G t0'f N I p Ip N O O 0 ~ ~ m N f 0 !O Pl O e N r p O N n p O ~ ~ O O C C p' O O p O O p 0 0 0 N O p ~ O Y1 N so oe °O °n 0 N O ~e O g N N YI ui m LL'' e a~ c ~ h ~ ~- o O ~ n ~ O r o r vi o; ~ r N LL ` a m j o o p O1 M O r ao o a m o c c m > o a p V N o 0 0 0 o W m o N O p M O Y N C N ~ O h f p n d C c d c N N C m g g O y V ~ ~ ~ o ~ c y m mmF a °' c U LL u ~ C "y A ~ N m O W T w Y a ~ d ~ U H U Q W P147 ~ a N r Q ^ O 7 ~~ O E j LL LLI g d a ¢ f n N O N O M 10 4 N O N O IG P O 7 0 O N N a C o o og a- K rc m d ~ ~Q N N ~ d 'f v 0 T s E r N ~ N A q b O~ ~, N ., ~ e I d o SC b Z M COJ IO O h N O W M O ~K O H m ~ O 0 e 0 'm ~ c 0 e 0 o 0 g o ° m v i n y ~ O O O O 7 O O O O N p N _ ~ C Y C d d M C ^ , 7 ~ ~ O O ' ~ C ~ ~ C (Q N O O 7 C ~ y o° °o O /0 N O i° '^ ~ ~ - N1 .O C C p ~ O ~ ~ ~'a ~ e° a U d a' o mu °o lac N c O Qm o 3 n z rc 0 LL J Q U LL ~ m p Y -~ W Ca i l O Q O Z ~ rv s R Cl d Y c ~ A w m ~ ~ ~ o o y O a m O O N d O q 41 m Z a_ '~ ~ N ~ n ° v U m m pN O !ml em'1 ~ S m d o N N O1 T O O pO w O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P O O pO ny O O Y O O O O O O O 0 a O O O 0 a c m 8 °o, 0 O O Y o ~ e r 0 W C U C ~ LL J ~ ~ a W ~ W w LL d ~ .C N 7 u (/1 C o O o a o' U u C d Q rn Qd d Q m n LL e~ 0 N O °o 0 0 n N O O N N O O O N N 0 °e O N m m Q W P148 J d ~! ? a r n O ~ j a~ LL a0 a ¢ E a 6 'o C 0 0 rc m R a a~ N f ~'~ W q O~ E~ M ~e M g r r ~ 9~ N 0 Y 8 m d_ 7 0~1 N ~ ~ L Cd G W C M C Q N ~ 7 C O 16 ~ N O a ~ ~ ~ M ~ O d ._ m d C C O O ~ '- d ° ~a ~ e° U a o mm au q Q m 0 a C m m N 7 U M N 8 0 0 M M n n ~ N 0 0 o e M M N 10 O O O N O O O O O O OO O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O O O O N b O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 .°n gi a 0 0 0 O O °n 5 z 0 LL J 6 U LL 0 0 Y ~ Z m > z O_ ~ Z '~ ~ 9 O H Y C m n 0 •a 6 v `o a e m 1O x Y N m U °m 0 m m ~? SM a 0 0 n n N T O O O 0 O O O O O G O O O O O O O O O O V O O Op yO Y Q n nn O O O O P V ;i, i m S 0 e O O O Y o G v m t W U ~ W LL i ~ a w a Q C W N LL O d L~ .C N u N m O o 6 O U u w Q m d e a „~ m LL n 0 m 0 OO O O O O O N N O O yn O N Yf O O O h h 0 0 O O N W 0 a N O F P149 ~ a Q r 1~ O ~ j ni Y ao a ¢ f a 0 C N 0 K m m a N r O y N d ~, •' C M d d M ~ 41 G ~ ~ ~ T ~ C t0 ~ t 7 C T m O N m 7 ~ ~ ~, O d C ~! w C ~ U r ~ O Q N ~a U m C 7 7 m u m w m H W O N 6 E$ d d3 rc~ 0 d~ » w'w L p u a ~o ao o~ aG n r dq ~~ N (N V Y c m m .~ 6 m m V Y= m U a m ._ u m N C O U V C a Q a m LL 0 0 c 0 0 0 e 0 O e e c 0 0 0 0 N N 9 s 9 0 O N P150 ~ a ~ ¢ N m o ~ m ai & LL a° =~ f a 0 N O C 0 e c K STAFF REPORT - RANCHO Date: July 18, 2012 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager _ From: Robert Karatsu, Library Director Subject: APPROVAL TO ALLOCATE $7,250 AWARDED BY THE CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY INTO LIBRARY REVENUE ACCOUNT 1291000-4740/0-3730 AND APPROPRIATE $7,250 INTO EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT 1291602-5010/0- 3730 FOR EMERGENCY CALIFORNIA LIBRARY LITERACY SERVICES GRANT. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve and allocate $7,250 received from the California State Library into Library revenue account 1291000-4740/0-3730 and appropriate into Library expenditure account in the following manner: 1291602-5010/0-3730 Part-Time Salaries BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS $7,250 In May of 2012, the Library successfully applied for aone-time emergency California Library Literacy Services grant from the California State Library. With the retirement of the Library's Literacy Coordinator, these funds will be used to pay for some part-time salaries to keep the Adult Literacy program open, while at the same time providing Library administration some time to decide the most efficient and cost effective way to run the Literacy program in the future. All grant funding must be expended by August 31, 2012. FISCAL IMPACT No net impact on the Library Fund or General Fund as the grant does not have any City matching requirements and fully funds the items listed above. Respectfully submitted, P151 Robert Karatsu Library Director STAFF REPORT RANCHO Date: July 18, 2012 C,,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Robert Karatsu, Library Director Subject: APPROVAL TO ALLOCATE $15,000 AWARDED BY THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS INTO LIBRARY REVENUE ACCOUNT 1301000-4740 AND APPROPRIATE $7,500 INTO EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT 1301602-5200 AND APPROPRIATE $7,500 INTO EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT 1301602-5300 FOR "BIG READ" GRANT. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve and allocate $7,250 received from the California State Library into Library revenue account 1301000-4740 and appropriate into Library expenditure accounts in the following manner: 1301602-5200 1301602-5300 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Operations & Maintenance Contract Services $7,500 $7,500 In May of 2012, the Library successfully applied for a competitive "Big Read" grant from the National Endowment for the Arts. The Library has previously implemented successful "Big Read" programs, which is designed to have the entire community read and discuss one book. This year, the book selected is "The Great Gatsby." All programs and book discussions are tentatively scheduled to begin in January 2013. FISCAL IMPACT No net impact on the Library Fund or General Fund as the grant does not have any City matching requirements and fully funds the items listed above. Re~spe~ctfully submitted, Robert Karatsu Library Director P152 P153 STAFF REPORT AD;~fINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPAR'13LENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Newcombe, Police Chief By: Frank Montanez, Police Sergeant !`\ Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyery ~ Subject: Y~ RANCHO C,'UCAMONGA AUTHORIZATION FOR THE TRANSFER OF ONE (1) 2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO HYBRID 2VVD CREW CAB, .PURCHASED FROM GEORGE CHEVROLET OF BELLFLOWER, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,811.80 IN ACCORDANCE TO REQUEST FOR QUOTE #115303, FUNDED FROM ACCT. NO. 1105208-5804 (AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT), TO FACILITATE THE VEHICLE'S USE BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT SERVICES. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the transfer of one (1) 2013 Chevrolet Silverado 2WD Hybrid Crew Cab, purchased from George Chevrolet of Bellflower, California in the amount of $37,811.60, in accordance to Request for Quote #115303, funded from Acct. No. 1105208-5604 (Air Quality Improvement Grant), to facilitate the vehicles use by the County of San Bernardino for Police Department Services. Background/analysis The San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department has provided specifications for the vehicle to the Purchasing Department. Purchasing prepared and posted to the City's website, RFQ # 115303. The request to transfer the Chevrolet Silverado Hybrid 2WD Crew Cab to the San Bernardino Police Department for liability requirements will alleviate the City from liability while the vehicle is in use under ownership with the County of San Bernardino Sheriff's Department. At the end of the vehicle's service life, it will be transferred from the County of San Bernardino Sheriff's Department back to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for proper surplus disposition. STAFF- REPORT ADbfINISTR~ITIVE SERVICES DEPdRTD-TENT RANCHO Date: July 18, 2012 C,,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Newcombe, Police Chief By: Frank Montanez, Police Sergeant~~\\~ Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior BuyeP ~~~~~jjjjj Subject: P154 AUTHORIZATION FOR THE TRANSFER OF TWO (2) 2013 JOHN DEERE UTILITY TERRAIN VEHICLES, PURCHASED FROM CASCADE TURF, LLC OF MONTCLAIR, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,940.53, IN ACCORDANCE TO REQUEST FOR QUOTE #115788 AND ONE (1) 2012 WELLS CARGO ENCLOSED TRAILER PURCHASED FROM JACOBSEN TRAILER, INC. OF FOWLER, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,656.76, IN ACCORDANCE TO REQUEST FOR QUOTE #114645 FUNDED FROM ACCT. NO. 1381701- 5604 (CAPITAL OUTLAY-VEHICLE), TO FACILITATE THE VEHICLES' USE BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT SERVICES. It is recommended that the City Council authorize the transfer of two (2) 2013 John Deere Utility Terrain Vehicles and one (1) Wells Cargo Enclosed Trailer to facilitate the vehicles use by the County of San Bernardino for Police Department Services. Background/analysis On April 4, 2012 the City Council approved the acceptance of grant revenue in the amount of $46,810.00, awarded by the California Emergency Management Agency (FY 2011 Homeland Security Grant) to the city of Rancho Cucamonga and authorized appropriation into Account 1381701-5604 (Capital Outlay-Vehicles) for the purchase of two (2) utility vehicles and one (1) enclosed trailer for the purpose of response to a catastrophic incident. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department has provided specifications for the utility terrain vehicles and enclosed trailer to the Purchasing Department. Purchasing prepared and posted to the City's website, RFQ # 115768 and RFQ # 114645. The request to transfer the two (2) utility terrain vehicles and (1) enclosed trailer to the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department for liability requirements will alleviate the City from liability while the vehicles and trailer are in use under ownership with the County of San Bernardino Sheriff's Department. At the end of their service life, the vehicles and trailer will be transferred from the County of San Bernardino Sheriff's Department back to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for proper surplus disposition. 'See Public Communications, Speaker Card No. 2, Dennis Cisneros P155 and Speaker Card No. 4, Allan Donnelly with respective attachements STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 18, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Tasha Hunter, Engineering Technician Subject: APPROVAL OF A "PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT" FOR THE RESIDENTIAL AREA IDENTIFIED AS "BELLA VISTA DRIVE, AND HENRY STREET' GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND WEST OF SAPPHIRE STREET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Permit Parking District for the area shown in Exhibit "A", and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said resolution. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 18, 2012, the residents of Bella Vista Drive, and Henry Street, and Turquoise Street, submitted a petition to the City requesting the formation of a Permit Parking District. The Permit Parking District will consist of eighteen (18) homes verses the proposed nineteen (19) homes. Sixteen (16) of the nineteen (19) homes have signed the petition requesting permit parking. (See Exhibit "A") Of the three (3) residents that did not sign the petition, two (2) could not be contacted, and one (1) resident was opposed to the creation of a Permit Parking District, which was on Turquoise Street. Upon review of the petition, it has been determined that the residence located at 5271 Turquoise Street will be excluded from the parking district. The City's determination for excluding Turquoise Street is based upon not being adjacent to the other streets within the district and the resident is not in favor of the Permit Parking District; therefore, the residence will be excluded. The residents have proposed the Permit Parking District to be established and will be posted restricting all parking except by permit for seven days a week 24 hours a day. Any vehicle parked within this Permit Parking District without a permit is subject to being cited, unless it is an exempt vehicle as defined by the ordinance. An example of an exempt vehicle would be a vehicle belonging to a landscaping maintenance contractor in the process of doing his work, or a delivery truck making a delivery. The City's Municipal Code, Chapter 10.50, outlines the procedures for establishing a Permit Parking District. The code also provides for the City Engineer to create forms, rules and procedures necessary to manage a Permit Parking Program for a specific district. A copy of the forms, rules and procedures, including process and cost to obtain permits, has been reviewed with the residents. The forms, rules and procedures are attached to the Resolution establishing the Permit Parking District, and are entitled, "Engineer's Recommendation and Report". The attached resolution has been reviewed as to form by the City Attorney, and is acceptable for approval. P156 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT -PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT July 18, 2012 Pape 2 Respectfully submitted, ~-!°'~ Mark A. F~ ' Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/DFJ:tch c: Vicinity Map Resolution Engineer's Recommendation and Report P157 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Vicinity Map ;. ,..-- ; z~i ~~i.-~. SENDA ~ ! - -- ~r---;-- ~- i ;. ----- ...T~ 'vicaRa~ ~, ~~ ~ _~ i ' ~ ~~ ,~ ~ ~~ ~ --: ~ , ~ ~ r I~I ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,~ ' ~ ~ l I ,__L__i _ i ~i~~ I~-- ~ 's , ,~,,~, , ,L 1 --~ `~ ~ ~- SURREY '~ 1 SURREY --~ Z j ~- ~ ~ __ -~ 'In ~- -, e _ ~ ,x ~ ~ I -- L !~ T i I I I ~ I ~{ _ gym, ~._~~_ HILL~SIDE~-~ I___~L_- _ _ ~ j _..r ~~ -~ 'a~ ~ i ~ ~ i 1 ~ 1 N W E S 5271 TURQUIOSE STREET -EXCLUDED • ~'' i PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT Item: .~?q: RANCHO GUCAMONGA tld;zyar I_ I)IINNLti ,A11i:I IAI9_ . a~lu}'ar I'm~l errs SA.A-I $P:Ai;NGI ~, Cmnr~7l:11cmhr„ tl'u.ii:~~i.1.~U.i~:~~~r>era,Cniu_~:13u~~urr,Di:~~'r:1~'ui.r:~~iQ158 Ciq~~Ll,~nug~~r' 1<,nx~R.Ou.itiu TH1: CITY OP RANCHO CUCADtONGA ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION AND REPORT July 18, 2012 PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM A Permit Parking Program allows residents of a qualified neighborhood special permits that exempt them and their guests from certain on-street parking restrictions. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS • A Permit Parking District may be established by resolution of the City Council. • Residents requesting the creation of a Permit Parking District must submit a petition signed by at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the residents or property owners within the boundaries of the proposed district. (One vote per address.) • The boundaries of a proposed Permit Parking District shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. • An application for a parking permit may be made by any resident living within boundary of an approved district. • The applicant must show proof of residence less than 30 days old, and proof of ownership for each vehicle that a parking permit is requested for. RESTRICTIONS A parking permit does not exempt a vehicle from Section 10.44.130, "Storage of Vehicles upon Streets", of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. According to Section 10.44.130, a vehicle may not park in the same parking space on a public street for more than seventy-two (72) consecutive hours. A parking permit does not exempt a vehicle from City Municipal Code Section 10.64.030 "Parking Restriction", of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. According to Section 10.34.030, it is unlawful for any person to park or store any house car, trailer, camp trailer, trailer coach, camper, or boat upon any public street or highway or alley within the City for longer than one hour between the hours of 2:00 AM and 6:00 AM on any day. TYPES OF PERMITS AND DISPLAY There are two types of parking permits available. There are permanent stickers for owned vehicles and transferable guest parking permits. The "permanent sticker" parking permit for an owned vehicle shall be permanently affixed to the lower driver side of the inside of the rear window of the assigned vehicle. The transferable guest parking permit shall be hung from the inside rear view mirror. P159 NUMBER OF PERMITS ALLOWED • A maximum of three (3) "permanent sticker" parking permits may be issued to residents of a single dwelling unit. • A resident may request more than three (3) "permanent sticker" parking permits for special circumstances. Special circumstances will be reviewed by the City Engineer. • A resident will be allowed a maximum of five (5) guest parking permits at any time. EXPIRATION • Permanent parking permits for "owned vehicles" are valid for a period of up to three (3) years. • Permanent parking permits for owned vehicles will expire on July 31, 2015, and every three (3) years thereafter. • Guest parking permits are valid for a period of one (1) year. Guest parking permits will expire annually on July 31st. COST OF PARKING PERMITS • Parking permit for owned vehicles • Guest parking permit (5 max) • Replacement of lost or stolen permits • Exchange of an old guest permit for a new permit • Parking Permit for a new vehicle $10 for the first vehicle plus $2 for each additional vehicle (3 max) when registered all at the same time. $10 each $10 each Free $10 • Temporary Guest Parking Permit (valid for one day) Free The cost of parking permits is based on the cost of materials and staff time to manage the program and for keeping records. Costs are subject to change. GUEST PARKING PERMITS • Each guest parking permit shall be numbered sequentially. The number of the guest parking permit issued to a resident shall be recorded and kept on file. • Guest parking permits are valid for a period of one (1) year. Guest parking permits will expire annually on July 31st. • Expired guest parking permits may be exchanged for current guest parking permits at no cost. • Only a resident of the permit parking district may apply for, return or exchange guest parking permits. P160 TEMPORARY GUEST PARKING PERMIT • A resident may apply for an unlimited number of Temporary Guest Parking Permits. Temporary Guest Parking Permits are valid for one day. • Only a resident of the permit parking district may apply for Temporary Guest Parking Permits. SPECIAL EVENTS If a resident desires more than five (5) guest parking permits for a special event, the resident may apply for a special event permit that will temporarily suspend the need for visitors to display a parking permit. Staff may require that the resident fulfill special conditions, such as notifying neighbors of the special event, and bagging the permit parking district regulation signs. TO OBTAIN A PARKING PERMIT You may obtain a parking permit in person Monday through Thursday, 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 or by mailing a copy of your information to: City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Parking Permit Coordinator P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Residents must provide proof of residency less than 30 days old in one of the following forms: • Current utility bill, blank statement, credit card bill, or other bill statement that was sent through the mail on a monthly billing cycle • Rental/lease agreement signed within the last 30 days • Proof of property ownership, tax bill or new escrow papers Residents must also provide a copy of the following: • Valid Driver's license. • Copy of the vehicle registration (Note: the resident must be the registered owner). • Company cars not registered to you require a letter from the registered owner authorizing you to use the vehicle and referencing the vehicle's license plate number. • Vehicles registered to family members other than the home owner need a letter from the homeowner identifying them as a family member. FINE FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS • Fine per violation $50 (Fines are subject to change) P161 COVER LETTER June 18, 2012 Craig Cruz, Asst. Engineer (909)477-2740, X4057 Email: Craig.Cruz@cityofrc.us Joe. Stofa (909) 477-2740 Joe.Stofa@cityofrc.us City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering, Traffic Division 10500 Civic Center Drive, P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 PURPOSE: This is a PETITION TO EXTEND the existing Skyline Community Permit Parking District, to include: 5100 block of Henry Street (2 Residents ) (South of Almond Street, West of Sapphire, North of Bella Vista Drive) 8100 - 8200 Blocks of Bella Vista Drive ( 16 Residents ) (West of Sapphire Street, South of Almond Street) 5200 block of Turquoise Street (1 Resident ) (North of 7900 Appaloosa Court) REASON: The Skyline Community Permit Parking District is already RCPD law enforced on Skyline Street, Inspiration Drive, Crestview Lane, and Crestview Court above Almond Street. The Temporary Day Parking has been eliminated on 8100 block of Almond Street. Both City mitigation efforts have pushed regular and significant volume of Commuter Vehicles and large unruly crowds into the adjacent neighborhoods. Affected Residents in these adjacent neighborhoods seek relief from crime and nuisances caused by daily and weekly Commuter Vehicles with Visitors to Cucamonga Canyon Creek Recreation, day and night. This Commuter 'Vehicle Traffic has displaced Street Parking use by Residents and their Guests. The: Commuter Vehicle Traffic generate Noise, Littering, Vandalism, Graffiti, Private Property Trespass, Harassment and confrontations with Resident Property Owner Families. City-Trash Collection, Street Sweeping and USPS Deliveries are hampered.This is already having a negative impact on Resident property value and quality of life. Property Protection Task Force Reports by CVWD, RCPD, RCFD, Graffiti P162 Removal, Animal Control and Public Works will reflect these problems stemming from Recreational Access of Cucamonga Canyon Creek. City, County and the U.S. Forest Service need this help to educate the Public, control crime, protect Private Property and steer Commuter Vehicle Traffic away from adjacent neighborhoods seeking Unauthorized Access points to the Canyon where Public Utilities and CVWD Assets are at risk. The Rancho Cucamonga City MITIGATION STRATEGY should require: 1.J USFS-SBNF Closure. of Cucamonga Creek to Recreation until proper public facilities are in place for safe National Park Recreation, i.e.Bathrooms, People and Pet Litter Collection, Fire and Safety Hazard Protections and Medical Rescue Response by Ground or Air necessary to accommodate these ill prepared over-capacity crowds. Z.) Improve Big Tree Lane Entrance with Posted Closure of this Wilderness to Recreation. Post Trespass Regulations and support RCPD/RCPD Law Enforcement efforts outside their jurisdiction. 3.J U.S.F.S. Law Enforcement Officers with Off Highway Motor Vehicles should collaborate with CERT trained local Volunteer Wilderness Conservation Non-Profit Organizations, RCPD Equestrian and Citizen Patrols with Radio Communication capability. 4.J Traffic Camera Surveillance monitoring Access Points and known Recreation areas/Trails are needed to protect this Wilderness Area and adjacent Private Property with Grant Funded cost -effective strategy; as is already done in other areas of S.B.N.F. experiencing similar problems. ( See California National Park Campsites Improved for and Protected by Off Highway Motor Vehicle Law Enforcement. ~ S.) Wilderness Recreation/Protection Education should be a Requirement for an Access Permit and use of Paid Parking above Skyline Community, behind a U.S.F.S..Gate Regulating Access Hours on U.S.F.S. jurisdiction for their Law and Regulation Enforcement. Please approve expanding the Skyline Permit Parking District to regulate significant Commuter Vehicle Parking and relieve Public Nuisances in these adjacent neighborhoods, used for day and night Cucamonga Canyon Creek Recreational Access. Questions and implementation should be communicated directly to affected Residents. ,,, Submitted on behalf of affected Residents by: (~%J, Dennis Cisneros (909 948-5325 ~/ 51Z6 Henry Street, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91701 dcisneros5126@charter.net P163 RESIDENT PETITION FOR PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT This Petition requests a City Council Resolution to extend the Skyline Community Permit Parking District to include adjacent neighbors on Turquoise Street 5200 Block, Henry Street 5100 Block, and Bella Vista Drive 8100 - 8200 Blocks for 24 Hours 7 Days a Weel<. Affected Resident Homeowners are listed by Home address. Print the name of one Owner Contact Person who will be on record as the authorized person to order Parking Permits. Initial the Yes or No Box if you want your Street Parking protected in this way. A copy of the R.C. Municipal Permit Parking District Code is provided for your reference. Permits are only needed for EXTENDED STREET PARKING by Residents or Guests. "Commuter Vehicles" using Street Parking who are not Residents or their Visiting Guests are subject to Citation and after 72 Hours may be Towed/Stored at Owner expense. This will authorize Police to Cite Vehicles not Guests of Residents, and ensure adequate Street Parking for Residents and their Guests. Contractor Services and Delivery Vehicles are exempt. This completed Petition will be submitted to R.C. Engineering - Traffic Division for study and Recommendation to City Council for a Resolution to implement in a timely process. You may direct any questions to R.C. Traffic Division X909) 477-2740, X4057 Craig Cruz or .Joe Stofa regarding the Petition Approval process or this Permit Parking District. RESIDENCE CONTACT PERSON INITIAL YES or NO UNAVAILABLE 5~:~71 5200 TURQUOISE ST. Dianna Lee X 5125 HENRY ST. Liu Dih X 5126 HENRY ST. Dennis Cisneros X 8171 BELLA VISTA DR. Ronald Foster X 8172 BELLA VISTA DR. Richard Widdis X &~h;`~I'" 817-4 BELLA VISTA DR. Alan Donnelly X 8201 BELLA VISTA DR. ___________- 6/18/2012 A202 BELLA VISTA DR. Bhavana X 8226 BELLA VISTA DR. Jeff Mann X 8227 BELLA VISTA DR. _____ __ 6/18/Z012 8239 BELLA VISTA DR. Aziz Muhamma X 8251 BELLA VISTA DR. Farbora Murphy X 8263 BELLA VISTA DR. Jennifer Dirksen X 8274 BELLA VISTA DR. John Zhang X 8275 BELLA VISTA DR. R.S. Manalang X 8286 BELLA VISTA DR. Eugene Gines X 8287 BELLA VISTA DR. Ansel Boyce X 8298 BELLA VISTA DR. Stephen Riderer X 8299 BELLA VISTA DR. Laura French X P164 RESIDENT PET-ITION -FOR- PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT This Petition requests a City Council Resolution to extend the Skyline Community Permit Parking District to include adjacent neighbors on Turquoise Street SZ00 Block, Henry Street 5100 Block, and Bella Vista Drive 8100 - 8200 Blocks for 24 Hours 7 Days d Week. Affected Resident Homeowners are listed by Home address. Print the name of one Owner Contact Person who will be on record as the authorized person to order Parking Permits. Initial the Yes or No Box if you want your Street Parking protected in this way. A copy of the R.C. Municipal Permit Parking District Code is provided for your reference. Permits are only needed for EXTENDED STREET PARKING by Residents or Guests. "Commuter Vehicles" using Street Parking who are not Residents or their Visiting Guests are subject to Citation and after 72 Hours may be Towed/Stored at Owner expense. This will authorize Police to Cite Vehicles not Guests of Residents, and ensure adequate Street Parking for Residents and their Guests. Contractor Services and Delivery Vehicles are exempt. This completed Petition will be submitted to R.C. Engineering - Traffic Division for study and Recommendation to City Council for a Resolution to implement in a timely process. You may direct any questions to R.C. Traffic Division (909) 477-2740, X4057 Craig Cruz or Joe Stofa regarding the Petition Approval process or this Permit Parking District. RESIDENCE CONTACT PERSON INITIAL YES or NO UNAVAILABLE ~ - -;p ~5Z00 TURQUOISE ST . Dianna Lee __ _- --_-- , " 5125 HENRY ST. Rudy .~~T~__~~'n .5126 HENRY ST. Dennis Cisneros _ _--~ 8171 BELLA VISTA DR:' Ronald Foster _- _____-- 8172 BELLA VISTA DR.' Richard Widdis ___ ______~ 81$4 BELLA VISTA DR.'~ Alan Donnelly _ ___ _-______ 8201 BELLA VISTA DR. _-__-__-____ ' j ~ _-- --- -------- ~ZOZ. ..BELLA VISTA DR. .~ ~ : -- ----- 8226 BELLA VISTA DRr Jeff Mann--- -- ~ - ------ 8227 BELLA VISTA DR. ____._.__-_-_- , ~-~% i A v1 - -- ------- 8239 BELLA VISTA DR.< z z~L ~~~c~!•r __- -------- 8251 BELLA VISTA DR. =;tl~r~~^.~.et~'L?L_ ~ ALL -- ----- 8263 BELLA VISTA DR. ~~-c+'~ ~e~?~ ~~_~~+ -- ------ 8274 BELLA VISTA DR. 5 ~~~ ~`~~, t~ °' `~L~~~ ~ ' " ~' --- -------- ~~2' 8275 BELLA VISTA DR. _ _ - - ~ -t---- Gi --- -------- ~~- 8286 BELLA VISTA DR. nes E gene. ___ _________ 8287 BELLA VISTA DR. Z~UG CC'_ = -- ------- 8298 BELLA VISTA DR. ~~~ L'~~!1~~ ~- -- ------ ~ 8299 BELLA VISTA DR. ~ ~*~"?~_~~i,A:d? -- -------- o s~s9 °° soya ~ o m m x ¢ SOE9 ll'd r ~ O m N N ~ N ~ ~ N N M m ~ ------- --- ------ ---- ---- -- _.____. - __-_L___ _________________ ---- -is-3~tir+days-- ---~ -- -- ; a ~ 0 m N R ~ N N u1 ~ r N ~ N --E}ZF 3 P}FlA~i3 - - o d ~ N N ~ N ' -1~/~~tN3k ~~ ~ W N O Rl N 0 r N ~ ~ O ^0 98L8 ZL LB 0918 °' 0418 c r ro ~ ~ 8£~8 ~ ~' -A'd lOLFH3- m m 4 M W 0 N O M N ~ ~ r I~ N ~ N ul M O N N ~ ~ Q P165 O N II X W Z C O w N C _~ t H rn ^C' W .~ w~ ^W, W J I ~ - - ' ---'----~ U`' __, I ~I ~~`, ~Z' !; ~r' ~--- may, Z ~ ` , - ---~ -~ ~ ~---- a ~ f ~------- ' --~ "' -- 4 .. - ' ~ -- . ~-- ~ - Q' Z~~d -- __ ~~ ___ -~- I ~ ~ __ , ~ __--., , .___~ ndhsrwda~ __ ____ ,- ~ - _, __ D - -- i' i i v -_ ,- ~ ~ -- ~ l ~ I f - i '~ . - LL - __ _ ~ _ - ___.U_ - ~ -_ ___,__ a- -i--Ott©lHt~iH~2lV;-! --- - ' ,-~b'~3th~~f i; a ntr3113Qb'fW_~ I I ~ L-!_._!..---- '- - --------- ------ - 1'~;-'r-,---[ -- -- , ~- U ~ d µ F ~ tr*, _ - --- -- ~-- LLI ; (n '~ ' ~ 19 iJU~1.V'l _ 4 ~ ' .a --'- -•*'------' `---`` ~ ,--~---,n3`3QISl"liH---nt/-N'dW;7l3H----`' ',0---!I---;Q,'~- -.- '~~--"r------IdSRN^f1 ~ i--~----F~XSTAI.~R'-- '~-!-'~~-_.--r- ~',_=t su '~, ~ ,, -~ 4 -~ ua, -, ,. -S o _ ~ ~ --- ,~ i43Wb'i•f9`d _ ,- __ ~ 199a`d3----~~ i, ~ ~,, ~`6._ ~biji --- _S ~ --- -© `--4 g~'~'~ Q ~ ----~ ~ --nd - --- -- --- 'ii'. ' ~ ~riDts 'ns ` --- ts'rivt~ nvvdvrt~-----nd~ , rr~~ W Yb`d0- i s -~,'- - - d'dN'----'-----~S~'d~01-=t~ uj; -+~-I ts_ 1 is t~~dsti?r-` n '---~ ©; ~ ---©~ ~ ~ ~s-aavs~ ca .~sa~vs_is - - ~~ ~',,,o~,'~ ~ ai _ a a ~ -~---,--------'-- ~----'-; ---~ +ts ~arr~d~vs s ~rdi~tr~ ~--- --,~ -r--~, --- ;i~==_ -' - -- -~, -- ~~~~~Y ~---- --~ --, i '~ ', '' -~ ~ c~ r---------rttra~rDn~rztr-rr---'----~ P166 x 0 °o_ N II m m c a° a~ 7 H ~ Z~ U~ ~ o 'T. U P167 RESOLUTION NO. 12-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 10.50 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE A. Recitals. (i) Chapter 10.50 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code permits the establishment of a Permit Parking District in an area in which commuter vehicles (vehicles operated by persons whose destinations are to nonresidential areas or uses) substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of available parking spaces for the use of residents. (ii) Attached hereto as Exhibit A is an area, commonly referred to as "Bella Vista Drive, and Henry Street" and hereinafter referred to as "the Parking District" in which commuter vehicles occupied by persons who are in route to the Cucamonga Creek are for various recreational purposes substantially and regularly interfere with the use and availability of parking spaces in the Parking District. (iii) Substantial evidence has been presented to this Council demonstrating that the persons referred to in Recital (ii) above, not only occupy a majority of the parking spaces in the Parking District, but also block access to the District's residences and driveways, generate significant noise, engage in hostile confrontations with those residents, deposit trash and litter within the Parking District, and that these activities occur regularly in weekly and daily intervals. (iv) It is the purpose of this Resolution to establish the Parking District as an area within which parking shall be limited at all times to parking by residents of that District, their guests and those persons exempt from that limitation pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 10.50.100 (v) Pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 10.50.040 the Residents' petition for a Permit Parking District shall be submitted before the City Council with the Engineer's Recommendation and Report which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. (vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have been satisfied. B. Resolution: NOW, THEREFORE, it hereby is found, determined and resolved by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: This Council hereby finds that all of the facts stated in Part A of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based on substantial evidence presented to this Council, the Council further finds and determines as follows: A. Commuter vehicles as defined in subsection 10.50.020A of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of parking spaces for use of residents within the Parking District; Resolution No. 12-109 -Page 1 P168 B. The interference by commuter vehicles referred to' paragraph 2A above occurs at regular and significant daily and weekly intervals; and C. The commuter vehicles referred to in Paragraph 2A above cause and are the source of unreasonable noise, traffic hazards and environmental pollution within the Parking District. D. A petition of the Residents of the proposed Parking Permit District as been received by the Engineer and said petition was confirmed to have more then 75% of the Residents agree with the Parking Permit District. E. No unreasonable displacement. of commuter vehicles will result into surrounding residential areas. F. No alternative solution, other than the establishment of the Parking Permit District is feasible or practical. 3. Based on the findings set forth in paragraph 2 above, the Parking District hereby is established as a Permit Parking District pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 10.50 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and parking therein is restricted to those residents and their guests possessing permits issued by the City Engineer or his delegate and those exempt pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 10.50.100. 4. The Engineer's Recommendation and Report has been submitted with the petition and the City Council accepts and approves said Recommendation and Report inclusive of Cost of Parking Permits. 5. The City Engineer hereby is instructed to immediately cause appropriate signs to be placed and posted within the Parking District indicating the parking limitations established by this Resolution and to implement and administer the permit process specified in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Sections 10.50.070 and 10.50.080. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Resolution No. 12-109 -Page 2 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPa~RTMENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 6294720 HELD IN LIEU OF A MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,335,350.59, FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PHASE 4 -GROVE AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 09-262 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 6294720 held in lieu of a Maintenance Guarantee Bond, in the amount of $2,335,350.59, for the Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 -Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue, Contract No. 09-262. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Southwest Construction Company Inc. 2909 Rainbow Valley Blvd. Fallbrook, CA 92028 Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer P169 MAS/JAD/SH:Is P770 sr PROJECT Vicinity Map Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Phases 4a and 4b Grove Ave to Amethyst Ave P771 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEP.~IRTMENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager RANCHO CUCAMONGA From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager ~~ Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $165,000.00 TO INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS, INC., FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE ARBORS SUBSTATION AND THE MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY SERVICE AREA FOR FY 2012113 TO BE FUNDED FROM 17053035309 AND 17053035603 MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUNDS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a sole source Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $165,000.00 to International Line Builders, Inc. (ILB), for operation and maintenance of the Arbors Substation and the municipal utilities electrical distribution system within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) service area to be funded from Account 17053035309 and 17053035603 Municipal Utility Funds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Area. The Arbors Substation was constructed by ILB and became operational supplying permanent load on February 13, 2004. The backbone infrastructure was also installed by ILB and the City began serving Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center as well as other developments within the Municipal Utility Service Area with permanent electric service. Staff identified that specialized operation and maintenance services would be required to continue providing dependable service to the RCMU service area. ILB is a full service electrical distribution and transmission power line construction company with 30 years of experience in energy-related facility installation, repair and maintenance services nationwide. A benefit of continuing a contract with ILB is their staff is local and already extremely familiar with the electric infrastructure in Rancho Cucamonga. Given the complexity of the infrastructure, the City would be ensuring it has the most knowledgeable staff working and will guarantee a timely and effective response to any disruption of operations and public safety. Staff research found the rates are reasonable compared to other local electric municipalities.. It is recommended the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a sole source Professional Services Agreement for operation and maintenance of the Arbors Substation and the municipal utilities electrical distribution system within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area to be funded from Account 17053035309 and 17053035603. Resp ubmitted, _',~ '~_ u~r ~ '...:... Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Attachment(s) STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DER-1RTIoIENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager P172 ~. ~ i RANCHO C,UCAMONGA From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Mike Bell, Fire Chief gy; Dean Rodia, Parks/Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer Subject: AUTHORIZATION TO RENEW CONTRACTS (CO 89-136, CO 90-145, CO 93-006) WITH MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, INC., OF IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA, WITH NO FEE INCREASE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF CITY PARKS, ARCHIBALD LIBRARY AND CITY AND FIRE DISTRICT LANDSCAPE SITES, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,550,000 FOR CITY FACILITIES AND $65,750 FOR FIRE DISTRICT FACILITIES TO BE FUNDED FROM VARIOUS GENERAL FUND ACCOUNTS, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT, CAPITAL RESERVE ACCOUNT, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ACCOUNTS, CFD ACCOUNT 868, LIBRARY ACCOUNT 290 AND FIRE DISTRICT ACCOUNTS AS APPROVED IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council and Fire Board of Directors approve the authorization to renew contracts (CO 89-136, CO 90-145, CO 93-006) with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc., of Irwindale, California, with no fee increase and consistent with the original competitive bid process, for Fiscal Year 2012- 2013 for the maintenance of City parks, Archibald Library, and City and Fire District landscape sites, in an amount not to exceed $1,550,000 for City facilities and $65,750 for Fire District facilities to be funded from various General Fund accounts, San Bernardino County Reimbursement account, Capital Reserve account, Landscape Maintenance District accounts, CFD account 868, Library account 290 and Fire District accounts as approved in the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Mariposa is one of three landscape contractors used by the City to provide maintenance services at various landscape sites citywide. The City Council has previously awarded contracts (CO 90-145, 89-136, 93-006) to Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc. Mariposa has submitted a letter of intent expressing their desire to continue service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga with NO rate increase for the 2012-2013 fiscal year. Mariposa has provided good service during the last year and staff recommends continuing the contract with this contractor with the same scope of work as Fiscal Year 2011-2012. Re ec Ily3ro miffed William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director Mike Bell Fire Chief WW/DR:kh ~~~~:- ~P173 STAFF REPORT -/ PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEP~1RThfENT ~,~--,~ ~~~ i~~~_,1nA7N1-CrHTtO ~ Date: July 18, 2012 UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Dean Rodia, Parks/Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer Subject: AUTHORIZATION TO RENEW CONTRACT (CO 08-162) WITH UNITED PACIFIC SERVICE, INC. (UPS) OF LA HABRA, CALIFORNIA, WITH NO FEE INCREASE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 FOR CITY-WIDE TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES WITH NO ADDITIONAL CONTRACT EXTENSIONS GRANTED THEREAFTER IN AN ANNUAL AMOUNT OF $620,000, TO BE FUNDED FROM VARIOUS CITY ACCOUNTS AS APPROVED IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the contract renewal (CO 08-162) with United Pacific Service, Inc. (UPS) of La Habra, California, with no fee increase and consistent with the original competitive bid process for fiscal year 2012-2013 for city-wide tree maintenance services with no additional contract extensions granted thereafter for City-Wide Tree Maintenance Services in an annual amount of $620,000, to be funded from various city accounts as approved in the Fiscal Year 2011-2012 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 15, 2008, the City Council approved and awarded a competitively bid contract with United Pacific Service, Inc. (UPS) for city-wide tree maintenance services. The City's current tree inventory is approximately 70,000. The contract was valid for a one (1) year term through June 30, 2009 and may be extended on a year-to-year basis by mutual agreement of the City Manager and the contractor. All other terms and conditions of the original agreement remain intact. This is the last contract renewal for UPS as staff is preparing new specifications and will be going out to bid this fiscal year. For FY 2012-2013, UPS has submitted a letter of intent expressing their desire to continue service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga with no rate increase. There have been NO rate increases during the time UPS has been providing service to the City. UPS has proven to be a competent, customer service friendly Contractor. Therefore, staff recommends approving the Contract renewal with UPS for Fiscal Year 2011-2012. Res c Ily s bmitt d, William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director BW:DR:kh P174 STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEP~RTbtENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Michael Courtney, Facilities Supervisor Kenneth Fung, Assistant Engineer RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT THE CITY HALL MAIN LOBBY CEILING REPLACEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 12-025 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT THE CONTRACTOR'S WARRANTY, AND AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $35,796.00 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the City Hall Main Lobby Ceiling Replacement Project, Contract No. 12-025, as complete, authorize the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept the Contractor's Warranty, and authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $33,898.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $1,790.00, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $35,796.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction.ofthe Public Works Services Director. The City Hall Main Lobby Ceiling Replacement Project scope of work consisted of the replacement of existing spline ceiling system with the new "T-bar" ceiling system. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: - Budgeted Amount: - Account Numbers: - Engineer's Estimate: - City Council Approval to Advertise: - Publish dates for local paper: - Bid Opening: - Contract Award Date: - Low Bidder: $50,000.00 1025001-5602 $50,000.00 February 15, 2012 February 28 and March 6, 2012 March 27, 2012 April 18, 2012 De La Riva Construction, Inc. P175 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: CITY HALL MAIN LOBBY CEILING REPLACEMENT PROJECT July 18, 2012 Page 2 - Contract Amount: - 10% Contingency: - Final Contract Amount: - Difference in Contract Amount: $33, 898.00 $3,400.00 $35, 796.00 $1,898.00 (+5.61%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of one (1) Contract Change Order including the balancing statement. The notable change significant to the increase of the Contract were: the raising and reinstallation of six (6) can lights, the addition of twenty 12-gauge wires to the lights, the removal of existing wall clips and the installation of new wall clips as directed by City personnel. The balancing statement accounts for other minor increases and decreases in the bid quantities. Resp ully s mitted, William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director Attachment WW/MC:kf P176 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Gov't. Code Section 27383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: All public rights-of-way within boundaries of Contract No. 12-025 APN- N/A 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, P.O. BOX 807, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730. 3. On July 18, 2012 there was completed in the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: City Hall Main Lobby Ceiling Replacement Project 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: De La Riva Construction, Inc. 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: City Hall Main Lobby Ceiling Replacement Project CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation, Owner r 6 William Wittkopf Public Works Servi s Director P177 RESOLUTION NO. 12-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CITY HALL MAIN LOBBY CEILING REPLACEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 12-025 AND.AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the City Hall Main Lobby Ceiling Replacement Project, Contract No. 12-025, has been completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director; and complete. WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the Public Works Services Director is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P178 STAFF REPORT -~~~' _ PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT '~ RANCHO Date: July 18, 2012 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Dean Rodia, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer Subject: AUTHORIZATION TO RENEW CONTRACTS (CO 02-018, CO 09-125) WITH TRUGREEN LANDCARE OF UPLAND, CALIFORNIA, WITH NO FEE INCREASE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF CITY LANDSCAPE SITES, IN THE AMOUNT OF $680,000 TO BE FUNDED FROM GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT 316 (STREET AND PARK MAINTENANCE) AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ACCOUNTS 136 (CARYN COMMUNITY), 137 (NORTH ETIWANDA), 138 (SOUTH ETIWANDA), 139 (LOWER ETIWANDA) AND 140 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) AS APPROVED IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 BUDGET It is recommended that the City Council approve the contract renewals (CO 02-018, CO 09-125) with TruGreen LandCare of Upland, California, with no fee increase and consistent with the original competitive bid process, for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 for the maintenance of City landscape sites in the amount of $680,000 to be funded from General Fund Account 316 (Street and Park Maintenance) and Landscape Maintenance District Accounts 136 (Caryn Community), 137 (North Etiwanda), 138 (South Etiwanda), 139 (Lower Etiwanda) and 140 (Rancho Etiwanda) as approved in the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS TruGreen LandCare is one of three landscape contractors used by the City to provide maintenance services at various landscape sites citywide. The City Council has previously awarded contracts (CO 02-018, CO 09-125) to TruGreen LandCare. TruGreen LandCare has submitted a letter of intent expressing their desire to continue service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga with NO rate increase for the 2012-2013 Fiscal Year. TruGreen LandCare has provided good service during the last year and staff recommends continuing the contract with this contractor with the same scope of work as Fiscal Year 2011-2012. Re~ "'~/tfully bmitted, William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director WW/DR:kh STAFF REPORT ADMINISTR~ITIVE SERVICES DEPdRTMENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: From: ey: Subject: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services RANCHO CUCAMONGA Manuel E. Pilonieta, Information Se 'c Manage Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer APPROVE AN AWARD FOR EAR SERVICES AND SUPPLIES CONTRACT FOR EXISTING COPIERS TO KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC., OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $80,870 It is recommended that the City Council approve an award for a one year services and supplies contract for existing copier to Konica Minolta Business Solutions, Inc., of San Bernardino, California, in the amount of $80,870. Services and supplies will be funded from the following adopted budget contract services accounts: $7,000 (acct. 1001701-5300), $5,210 (acct. 1290601- 5300), $7,850 (acct. 1290606-5300), $6,310 (acct. 1290607-5300), $52,500 (acct. 1712001-5300), and $2,000 (acct. 3281501-5300). BACKGROUND As is a common and cost effective practice, the City uses an annual multi-function copier contract that provides maintenance, repair, and replacement of consumable supplies such as toner, staples, and other components. Based on a competitive bid in 2005, Konica Minolta Business Solutions, Inc. has been providing these services and supplies. Although these copiers are past their recommended useful life, as a cost deferment strategy, replacement of these units is being postponed. Staff anticipates going out to bid for copier replacements with services and supplies contract at a future date. P179 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTI,IENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: From: By: Subject: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager /~,~ RANCHO COCAMONGA APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $131,000.00 TO BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN, INC., FOR TECHNICAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SUPPORT WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY SERVICE AREA FOR FY 2012/13 TO BE FUNDED FROM 17053035309 MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUND RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a sole source Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $131,000.00 to Butsko Utility Design, Inc., for technical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area to be funded from Account 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Area. The Arbors Substation was constructed and became operational supplying permanent load on February 13, 2004. The backbone infrastructure was installed and the City began serving Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center as well as other developments within the Municipal Utility Service Area with permanent electric service. Butsko Utility Design, Inc. has been providing electrical engineering and design support since 2001 during the beginning planning stages of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. As the designer of the distribution system, Butsko Utility Design, Inc. is uniquely qualified to provide inspection, design and project management services for these vitally important and time-sensitive projects. They have a broad range of experience from each of California's major energy utilities including Sempra Energy, Southern California Edison and.Pacific Gas & Electric. It is recommended the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a sole source Professional Services Agreement for technical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area to be funded from Account 17053035309. Respectful_-ly submitted, -`tea` ~~a2~'~. ark teuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS: FL/rlf P180 Attachment(s) P181 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEP.1R"I'tifGNT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager !~ RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $132,000.00 TO APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., FOR INSTALLATION, CONFIGURATION AND METER READING SERVICES WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY SERVICE AREA FOR FY 2012/13 TO BE FUNDED FROM 17053035309 MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUND RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a sole source Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $132,000.00 to Applied Metering Technologies, Inc., (AMT) for installation, configuration and meter reading services within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area to be funded from Account 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Area. The Arbors Substation was constructed and became operational supplying permanent load on February 13, 2004. The backbone infrastructure was installed and the City began serving Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center as well as other developments within the Municipal Utility Service Area with permanent electric service. With the ongoing need to provide retail customers with accurate permanent metered electric service, staff found that Applied Metering Technologies, Inc., is the only provider in the area qualified in all aspects of electric meter services. They are certified and used by each of the three Investor Owned Utilities (Edison, San Diego Gas & Electric and PG&E). Staff surveyed other local publicly owned electric utilities and confirmed the rates provided are reasonable and comparable. It is recommended the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a sole source Professional Services Agreement for meter installation, configuration and meter reading services within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area to be funded from Account 17053035309. Respe I.y.submitted, ~ .... Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:FL/rlf Attachment(s) STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director By: Francie Palmer, Community Services Marketing Manager~~' RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION TO WAIVE VARIOUS FEES AND CHARGES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE GRAPE HARVEST FESTIVAL AND CARNIVAL SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 17-19, 2012, AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council waive various fees and charges for the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce Grape Harvest Festival and Carnival, for one year, scheduled for August 17-19, 2012, at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex. Fees recommended to be waived include: base rent, the move-in/move-out rental fee, the percentage payment on gross sales of food and beverage, and the percentage payment for parking fees as well as any City related permits required for the event. In addition it is recommended that the City Council approve the Chamber's request for the sale and consumption of alcohol (beer and/or wine) at one pavilion area and three separate satellite beer stations on site for the Grape Harvest Festival conditional on the issuance of an ABC (California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control) daily license provided to the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce has hosted a wine and grape festival for the community for a number of years. The location of this very popular event has changed over time from Guasti Park in Ontario, Victoria Gardens and last year returned to the Special Event Area at the Epicenter. The Chamber's 2012 event will take place starting on Friday, August 17`" and will continue throughout the weekend, ending Sunday evening, on August 19"'. Activities planned specifically by the,Chamber of Commerce for the Grape Harvest Festival include: a full scale carnival, Business Expo, arts and crafts booths, a community stage featuring local entertainment, traditional grape stomps, food and beverage vendors.and four wine and/or beer areas. The Chamber will be using the following locations at the Epicenter for their event: Parking Lot G (carnival rides/activities, business expo), Parking Lot A-B-C (Parking). In compliance with the City's Alcohol Ordinance, Number 634, which allows selected events at the Epicenter to sell or consume alcoholic beverages within restricted areas, the Chamber's beer/wine pavilion and three beer stations will be located in Parking lot G. Attendance at the Chamber's weekend event has been estimated by the Chamber at 12,000 to 15,000 individuals. P182 P183 FEE WAIVER REQUEST FOR R.9i\'CHO CUG Ll10i\'GA CHAMBER OF COA1h1ERCE GRAPE HARVEST PAGE 2 FESTTVAL AI\'D CARi'~IIVAL JULY 18, 2012 Hours of usage for the Grape Harvest will be as follows: • Thursday, August 16"' 5:00 p.m. until 11:00 p.m. (Load in) • Friday, August 17`" 5:00 p.m. until 11:00 p.m. • Saturday, August 18`h 10:00 a.m . until 11:00 p.m. • Sunday, August 19"' 10:00 a.m . until 8:00 p.m. • Monday, August 20"' 7:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. (Clean up) City staff recommends that City Council consider waiving the Municipal Code requiring a 10% Admission Tax from the gross sale of entry to the event. Section 3.36.140 of the City's Municipal Code provides for an exemption to the City's collection of its Admission Tax for an event that is a part of a City function/activity. In addition, staff would recommend that the percentage payment of 10% from the gross sales of food and beverage and 50% of the VIP parking revenue from the event also be waived. Staff recommends that the Chamber be responsible for all direct costs that are exclusively related to their planned activities. The Chamber would be required to pay for Grape Harvest related public works maintenance fees and police security charges, as well as providing a refundable damage security deposit for the event. Such charges are consistent with other events at the Epicenter where direct services are provided by City/Police staff to support the elements of the activity. City staff will work closely with the Chamber representatives to insure a cost effective program and to minimize the reimbursement costs to be paid by the Chamber. Staff recommends that the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce and their Carnival vendor be required to provide the following evidence of insurance coverage for the Grape Harvest Festival, no later than August 151: $2 million public liability insurance with a separate Additional Endorsement naming the City of Rancho Cucamonga as additionally insured for the full timeframe of the event, including move-in and move-out dates $1 million automobile insurance $1 million workers compensation insurance FISCAL IMPACT: It is recommended that the City Council approve a one year fee waiver for the Chamber for the rental fees of the Epicenter ($12,500), the Admission Tax from the sale of wrist bands to enter the event (estimated at $10,000.00), percentage payment from their food/beverage sales (estimated at $5,000) and the percentage payment of the parking fees ($4,000). This is consistent with the partnership arrangement the City and Chamber had in 2011. As planning for the Grape Harvest Festival is still underway and specific charges are not confirmed, it is also proposed that the City Council approve staffs recommended policy guidelines for the reimbursement of direct costs from the Chamber for Public Works maintenance charges and Police security fees that are directly attributed to the Grape Harvest Festival. Resp ctfully submitted, Nettie Nielsen Community Services Director P184 STAFF REPORT AD\QNIS'I'RATR'E SERVICES DEPARTI•fENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III t RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAXES A AND B FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATES. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds, and fund law enforcement operations and maintenance. There is no increase to the current rate for FY 2012-2013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 21, 1989, the City Council approved the formation of Community Facilities District No. 88-2 for Drainage Capital Facilities and Law Enforcement services and authorized the annual levy of special taxes to pay debt service on the bonds and fund the costs of law enforcement operations and maintenance. The special tax levied annually for drainage facilities is listed as Special Tax A -Drainage Facilities. On April 7, 1994, City Council approved Resolution No. 94-058, authorizing the issuance of bonds. On June 3, 1999, City Council adopted Resolution No. 99-127 authorizing the refunding of special tax bonds for this district. The refunding bonds were issued in July 1999 in the amount of $2,705,000. The special tax was set at 91 % of the maximum rate when the district was formed for the developed property. However, the authorized bond refunding adjusted the rate to 78% of the maximum special tax for the developed and undeveloped property. The collections from the annual levy will be used to pay debt service through the life of the bonds. The levy of special taxes annually for the Law Enforcement services is listed in Special Tax B -Law . Enforcement. When the City receives the collections, the funds for Special Tax B -Law Enforcement are transferred to the General Fund to offset the Law Enforcement costs. P185 CI'll' COUNSIL STALL REPOR'C CI'U NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE ANU le\W EN FORE\IENT) JULY 1 S, 2012 PAG12 Special Tax A -Drainage Facilities Residential Class I (3590+ S.F.) $735 Residential Class II (3077-3589 S.F.) $544 Residential Class III (2564-3076 S.F.) $408 Residential Class IV (2308-2563 S.F.) $326 Residential Class V (2051-2307 S.F.) $272 Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) $190 Undeveloped Property $1,190/acre Special Tax B -Law Enforcement Residential Class I (3590+ S. F.) Residential Class II (3077-3589 S. F.) Residential Class III (2564-3076 S.F.) Residential Class IV (2308-2563 S.F.) Residential Class V (2051-2307 S.F.) Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 Pt86 RESOLUTION NO. 12-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses. for the next fiscal year 2012-2013 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P187 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs. and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P188 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July, 2012. Executed this day of July, 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P189 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2012 P790 Resolution No. BACKGROUND On June 21, 1989, the City Council approved the formation of Community Facilities District No. 88-2 for Drainage Capital Facilities and Law Enforcement services. On June 27, 1989 the electors within the boundaries of the District authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of not to exceed $4,000,000 to finance certain public improvements to meet the needs of the new development, and approved the Special Tax Formula and levy of a Special Tax to pay principal and interest on the Bonds, pay directly for the facilities, pay administrative expenses and law enforcement operations and maintenance of the District and make any replenishment to the Reserve Fund. On April 7, 1994, City Council approved Resolution No. 94-058, authorizing the issuance of bonds in the principal amount of $2,920,000. On June 3, 1999, City Council adopted Resolution No. 99-127 authorizing the refunding of special tax bonds for this District. The refunding bonds were issued in July 1999 in the amount of $2,705,000. The special tax was set at 91 % of the maximum rate when the district was formed for the developed property. However, the authorized bond refunding adjusted the rate to 78% of the maximum special tax for the developed and undeveloped property. The collections from the annual levy will be used to pay debt service through the life of the bonds and also fund law enforcement operations and maintenance. The District's boundary is west of San Sevaine Road, east of Wardman Bullock Road, north of Hoppe Drive, and south of San Bernardino National Forest. FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 There is no increase for fiscal year 2012-2013 from the prior year. The current rates will provide sufficient funding to pay for operations and maintenance in the amount of $257,460. Community Facilities District No. 88-2 FY2012/2013 P191 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $232,300.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 24,460.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 0.00 TRANSFER OUT TO CFD-2 POLICE $ 700.00 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0.00 $257,460.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 20,650.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 2,200.00 TRANSFER IN FROM FUND BALANCE $ 0.00 SPECIAL TAX $272,190.00 $295,040.00 Community Facilities District No. 88-2 2 FY2012/2013 N DO ~~ /`I~t v N ~ N ~ •i ~ . J Q ~ •1.r c 1 ~ U U ® .n 0 O ~ ~ ny.iCJJay~ ~ 4 ~ ~ J tir o A• W d N •_ C m ' p In •~ 1 y D o 1 V j m m ~ 3 0 ~ li Q ~ 11 `~ i •_.._•._.._..~ .._.._.._.._.. i nH ise3 in .~ i ® i L •~ i ny ep _.._.._ . ~ ny epuenn!13 ~ ~ ® ~ j ~ ~8 ~aaJ~ ~(ea i ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.y i i V ny Jalsayooa i i ny Jalsayooa ~..~ j 1 1 ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._..- - i ny ua~!II!W 1 1 1 1 ny uaneH i i i my uaneH i i ny esowJaH ~ _ ! ny esowJaH i 1 nH PIeQ!4oJ`d ~ ~ ny pley!yoJb i ny uewllaH i - ~•/" i ~ ny uewllaH i ter" t r v ny p e~(au! n 1S ue!lawe~ ~ - 1 ./ ~7 . 1 t L s~t s l i - ,l ~ ~ •~ 1 p p vl~ °In l'Yq a t.._.. ~ •~ .._^ _. .. .. L.. ._~_ - -f n`d anOJ~ p { ~fi~BB"93 $e ° ~_. /"/ (n C m 2' V1 i q anti Fs ~E ~.._..~_.. .._.._.• C ~ Q ~ ~ ~ i ° ~ v ~ m m ll Og ~ FE1t d ~ v c ~€j ~+§~~~£~ ~ 3 3* ~' o' ~ j; ~ $3 g+, ~~k6~gae~$ 5 F • ,_SCs~7 Esn $ ~ d gg EaE:aid~~8~! STAFF REPORT ADhIINISTRATIVESERVlCES DEPARTbIENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III J RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) WITH. NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. It is recommended -that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting an annual benefit assessment levy for the maintenance and/or servicing of a drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin). There is no increase to the current rate for FY 2012-2013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 6, 1991, City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-331 for the annual levy of benefit assessments for the maintenance and/or servicing of a 27+ acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2, Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Drainage Area No. 91-2 was adeveloper-initiated district. Protection of the properties from the overland flows was necessary in order to receive development rights from the City. The costs associated with the maintenance of this district are passed on to the property owners, as they receive special and direct benefit that is distinguishable from the other property owners that are outside the boundary. There are 351 single-family homes within this boundary that receive this benefit. The total annual cost for maintenance to each home is $92.17. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Supplement to Final Engineer's Report 3. Map P193 P194 RESOLUTION NO. 12-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertook proceedings to authorize the levy and imposition of benefit assessments to pay for the annual drainage maintenance, including the removal of sediment and debris from the Day Canyon Channel improvements and basin, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 54703), said area of benefit being known and designated as DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (the "Drainage Area"); and WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented to this City Council a Supplemental Report (the "Supplemental Report") to the Final Engineer's Report Drainage Area No. 91-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga setting forth a description of the proposed service, cost estimate and assessment schedule for fiscal year 2012/2013 (the "Final Engineer's Report"); and WHEREAS, at this time this City Council desires to determine the cost of providing authorized services to be financed by the levy of a benefit assessment for fiscal year 2012/2013 and to determine and impose such benefit assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the Supplemental Report is hereby approved and ordered to be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. Said Supplemental Report generally consists of the following: A. A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived through the levy and collection of the benefit assessment; B. A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment; C. The amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel. P195 SECTION 3: That the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report is hereby adopted and has been utilized as the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment to be levied in fiscal year 2012/2013. SECTION 4: That this City Council hereby determines and orders that the benefit assessments described in the Supplemental Report within the Drainage Area are hereby confirmed and levied for fiscal year 2012/2013. SECTION 5: That the above confirmed and levied benefit assessment for fiscal year 2012-2013 shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as general County property taxes are collected and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of such County taxes shall be applicable to the collection and enforcement of these benefit assessments. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July, 2012. Executed this day of July, 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P196 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William J. Alexander, Councilmember Chuck Buquet, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager JULY 2012 P197 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Report Exhibit A -Description of Service Exhibit B -Cost Estimate Exhibit C -Assessment Schedule Map P 188 AGENCY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT: DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 TO: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982 This Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report (the "Annual Supplement") for City of Rancho Cucamonga Drainage Area No. 91-2 is hereby submitted consisting of the following documents, pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703. This Annual Supplement is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013. 1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE (Exhibit "A"): A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived from the levy and collection of the annual benefit assessment. 2. COST ESTIMATE (Exhibit "B"): A listing of all costs and expenses for the next fiscal year, including incidental expenses. 3. BENEFIT ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE (Exhibit "C"): The annual assessment schedule, setting forth the following: A. Annual Benefit Assessment: The amount of the proposed benefit assessment for each parcel. B. Description of Parcel: A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment, said parcel being described by the County Assessor's parcel number. P199 No benefit assessments shall be imposed or levied upon land owned by a Federal or State governmental agency and/or any other local agency. Any utility property and right-of-way shall be subject to assessment only to the extent that it is specifically benefited from the proposed services. Reference is made to the Final Engineer's Report as incorporated in Resolution No. 91- 331 for a description of the boundaries of the Drainage Area and each parcel therein and for the method of spreading the benefit assessment. Executed this day of July 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA By: Final approval, confirmation, and levy of the annual benefit assessment and all matters in the Annual Supplement were made on the day of July, 2012, by adoption of Resolution No. by the City Council. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A copy of said Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report was filed in the Office of the City Engineer and the City Clerk on the day of July, 2012. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICESlCITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA P200 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE The properties within Drainage Area No. 91-2 are located within the boundaries of the Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Protection of the properties within the district from overland flows requires the construction of a 27+ acre-foot desalting basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel. The channel improvements. will intercept the overland flows prior to reaching the properties and carry the storm water runoff, sediment, trash, organic material, and related debris to a desalting basin. Each year the sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris that accumulates in the desalting basin and channel must be removed and transported to an approved spoils site. The services proposed to be financed from the revenue derived from the levy and collections of the annual benefit assessment are as follows: A. Monthly on-site inspections of the desalting basin and channel. B. Bi-monthly weed abatement program for the desalting basin and channel. C. Removal of accumulated sediment, trash, organic. material, and other related debris from the desalting basin and channel to an approved spoils site. This service is expected to be provided annually. During times of excessive rainfall, this service may be required more frequently. P201 EXHIBIT B COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 A. Cost of Annual Maintenance Regular Salaries $30,840.00 Fringe Benefits $14,160.00 Subtotal $45,000.00 B. Incidental Expenses City Administration $ 6,570.00 Subtotal $ 6,570.00 C. Total Annual Costs $51,570.00 D. Contribution/Fund Balance ($18,440.00) Interest Earnings ( 1,720.00) Delinquencies ( 350.00) E. Balance to Assessment $31,060.00 P202 EXHIBIT C ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE WHEREAS, this City Council has previously, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703, formed Drainage Area No. 91-2 all in accordance with the provisions of said Act; and, WHEREAS, the Annual Supplement for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 consisting of certain documentation (including the amount of the proposed assessment-for each parcel, a description of the parcel and a description of the service proposed to be provided) has now been prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, the Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer by virtue of the power vested pursuant to said Act and by order of the legislative body, hereby makes and recommends the following benefit assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the service proposed to be financed through the levy of assessments and revenue derived for the fiscal year 2012-2013. Said costs and expenses are generally as follows: Personnel Salaries $ 45,000.00 Cost of Improvements $ 0.00 Incidental Expenses $ 6,570.00 Total Costs $ 51,570.00 Contribution/Fund Balance ($ 18,440.00) Subtotal $ 33,130.00 Interest ($ 1,720.00) Delinquent Assessments ($ 350.00) Balance to Assessment $ 31,060.00 I do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the several parcels of land within the area of benefit in proportion to the estimated benefits received, and hereby further state as follows: A. The amount of benefit assessment imposed is specifically related to the benefit of the parcel, which will be derived from the provision of the service to be provided. B. The annual aggregate amount of the total benefit assessment does not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service. C. The revenue derived from the benefit assessment shall not be used to pay for the cost of any service other than the service for which the benefit assessment was levied. P203 The assessment parcels herein refer to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels, and said Roll shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. The net amount to be assessed upon the lands has been spread and apportioned by formula as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report in accordance with the benefits received from each parcel, and in my opinion, said costs and expenses have been apportioned in direct relationship to the benefits received from the maintenance works of improvement. In the opinion of the undersigned, the benefit assessments have been spread and apportioned in accordance with the benefits to be received from the proposed work and services. Dated: DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT PARCEL NUMBER 0225-451-01 to 35 0225-451-39 to 46, 49,50,53 0225-451-55 to 62, 64 0225-462-01 to 07 0225-462-12 to 17 0225-463-03, 06 to 33 0225-464-01 to 04, 06, 07 0225-464-19 to 30 0225-471-01 to 58 0225-481-01 to 42 0225-491-01 to 19 0225-561-01 to 34 0225-571-01 to 35 0225-581-01 to 38 0225-681-01 to 03 0225-681-05 to 11 Total PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 351 Residential Parcels AMOUNT OF ASSESSMENT $32,352.00 $32,352.00 P204 N ~~ ~ ~ N J Q ~ ~i Q ~ ®. "" o f = G m o h ~ ~~~ ny ti~a4~ ~ y . 0 ! d r~ ~.G ,_.._.._.._.._ v J ti• o C ~ ~ A, i ~ N W _ C ~ J m ~ o 1 ~ ~ ~+ s 3 ~,ww ~ Q O v/ 1 m li Q 1 _....._.._.._.._.. y i i~_._.. -int/lse3 in H i ~ t v Q ~ ny ep _.._.._ .' ny epuenn!33 •1.~ i y- i i ~ ~ I _ ~8 ~aa~~ ~(eQ, Q~ ._.._.._.._.._.._.._..1 . m ny ~a3sayoob ny ~a3sayooa •~.. 1 ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._.._° - ~ ny ua~!II!W i ! i ny uaneH i - ~ - i °ny uaneH i ny esow~aH ~ ny esow~aH i nH PIe9!4o~V ~ nH PIe9!4oeH i ny uewllaH i ~~"~ ny uewllaH j fit" L t v _~ nV P~e~(au!n 3S ue!lawe~ ~Gs~e~aL¢Ga~ 1 s $x;Y pF 4€ E a N c f~ (r • •fn e1F~ °p~€ -•ti t ~ = 3 L s~~~~~=Y ~ ~ f6 o Q - ~c_$~5x3ag~~ c [O LL 5 V C y~fs~$€$E as ae Ey ~z sag gs'=€ V1 c0 ~G ie°FYpg• 0] 8?~ei xEf ~~e 2 gge3~ep$i~e~' U ~ud ors Fp=aag so 8~2~~8ag=a~5§ ~y EL~1 se~?4`Y EI /. ~~ U ~S~o GEl ec's $L P205 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: From By: Subject: Mayor and Members of the City Council RANCHO. C,UCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst, III APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting an annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate for FY 2012-2013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On December 1, 1993, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $4,825,000. On December 15, 1993, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 518 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on March 15, 1994, for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain public improvements that were required for and would permit the development of the properties within the district. On June 3, 1999, City Council adopted resolution No. 99-127 authorizing the refunding of special tax bonds for this district. The refunding bonds were issued in July, 1999 in the amount of $4,525,000. While the property owners within the district approved the maximum rate for the special tax at $20,000 per acre, the tax rate that is needed to meet obligations for FY 2012/2013 is $14,369 per acre. This is the same rate as in the prior fiscal year. This special tax shall be levied as long as necessary for each parcel of taxable property to pay for the facilities and to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P206 RESOLUTION NO. 12-113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code forthe State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2012-2013 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: P207 Resolution No. A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P208 Resolution No. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July 2012. Executed this day of July 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P209 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2012 P210 Resolution No. BACKGROUND On December 15, 1993, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $4,825,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of the street, storm drain, sewer and water improvements. The district is bounded on the north by Foothill Blvd., on the east by Etiwanda Ave. and on the west by Interstate 15. The maximum rate has been set at $20,000 per acre. This amount can be levied at a lower rate but cannot exceed the maximum tax rate as set. On July 1, 1999 this district was refunded as part of Rancho Cucamonga Reassessment District No. 1999-1 under the Rancho Cucamonga Public Finance Authority (the "Authority'). The Authority issued bonds to acquire the Acquired Obligations, fund separate reserve funds and pay the costs of issuing the Bonds. The acquired obligations for Community Facilities District 93-3 are the aggregate principal amount of $4,525,000. FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 The annual tax rate of $14,369 for fiscal year 2012-2013 will provide sufficient funding to pay for operations and maintenance in the amount of $428,510. Community Facilities District No. 93-3 FY2012/2013 P211 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $387,970.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 14,600.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0.00 $402,570.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 3,770.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCES $292,820.00 SPECIAL TAX $105,980.00 $402,570.00 $14,369 PER ACRE Community Facilities District No. 93-3 2 FY2012/2013 M M w V 'i ~I.r .y A~ W `~ V w O V ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny esow~aH nV Pleq!yo~y ny uewllaH 1S ue!lawe~ go ' ~. ..____ (q ~ C d ~ ~ C N m rn L m v m c J N m ..._..°_ - -• ny anal ' s t t O W ~ O Q f V- 3 E ~p~Ca c ~ N 5 i~ ny tiiay~ ..._ ~ d C _ J m ~ N L 3 m o 0 w Q ~ E ~ ~ . J ?' O a ~ U U ~ ^~ J ti•r ~ J ~~ ® ~ O 0 oN N O ~® I j nt/ ise3 cn ~, i ~ ny epuenn!l3 ~/~ ® ~.I .. .. ..Ji ny epuennll3 ~aa~~ /yea I ~ ._.._.._.._.._.._.y i ny ~a3sayooa i i i ny ~alsayooa _..: I i ny ua~pl!W my uaneH i ny esow~aH i inV Pleq!yo~y i ~.~' ~ ny uewllaH .t~~ L ny p e~(auy~ P213 STAFF REPORT ~ - ADhfINISTRATIVESERMCES DEPARTbfENT RANCHO Date: July 18, 2012 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) WITH A REDUCTION IN THE CURRENT RATE It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the special tax to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 7, 2000, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $1,365,000. On November 15, 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 645 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on December 21, 2000, for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain public facilities that included street, sewer, water, storm drain, landscaping and park improvements that were required for and would permit the development of the properties within the district. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2024-2025. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $658,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $111,310 for FY 2011/2012 to $90,160 for FY 2012/2013. This translates to a 19% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment. Because of the structure of the refunding, the savings to the property owners will be even greater beginning in FY 13/14. The levy of special taxes annually is based on the square footage of the home for residential properties and is based on acreage for non-residential properties. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report P214 STAFF REPORT CFll 2000-O1 JULY 18, 2012 PAGF. 2 3. Map P215 RESOLUTION NO. 12-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Year 2012-2013 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P216 Resolution No. Page SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal and interest on any. outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P217 Resolution No. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Page L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July, 2012. Executed this day of July, 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P218 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 SOUTH ETIWANDA ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2012 P219 Resolution No. BACKGROUND On November 7, 2000, the eligible landowner voters within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) authorized the issuance of bonds in the principal amount of $1,365,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of a portion of the facilities which generally are defined as street, storm drain, sewer, water landscaping and park improvements. The District is located east of Interstate 15 and is bordered by Foothill Boulevard to the south, East Avenue to the east, Base Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the west and is intersected by Miller Avenue. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $658,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $111,310 for FY 2011/2012 to $90,160 for FY 2012/2013. This translates to a 19% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment. Because of the structure of the refunding, the savings to the property owners will be even greater beginning in FY 13/14. FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 CFD 2000-01 SOUTH ETIWANDA DESCRIPTION 1. Residential Property 2. Residential Property 3. Residential Property BUILDING ZISE > 2301 Sq Ft 1801 - 2300 Sq Ft <1800 Sq Ft ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX $298.12 $283.22 $253.41 Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 FY2012/2013 P220 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $ 90,160.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 14,450.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1.500.00 $106,110.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 3,180.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCES $ 21,510.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 1,320.00 SPECIAL TAX $ 80,100.00 $106,110.00 Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 2 FY2012/2013 ~ d O ~ ~, O 0 ' O N ~ o J N '~ Q ~ U U ~ ~ V o ~ i`- ny tiiay~ _ ~ y r ~ o y ~ ,.. o ~ O ~ ~ C N ~ h ~ ~ °-° ~ ° C1 1 .~ N m m t o 3 0 ~ i ~i Q ._..~.._.._.._.._. i V ' i nb' lse3 in ' ~ 1' ~ i ny epueM!33 ' ~ ny epuenn!33 ~ i i ~ ~ i ~ ~8 ~aa~~ step i \_o_o_v_e_o_o_u' ' ny ~alsayooa =- n is sa o0 i d 3 y 21 ~ .~..~ j V 1 1 ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._..: i ny ua~!II!W - i i i i i i i n uane i y H i my uaneH i i _ ny esow~aH ~ ! ny esow~aH . i i nV Pleq!4o~V ~ . jnll Pleq!4o~b' i ny uewllaH i i ~•r'ln ny uewllaH i ~" ~ r' L L ~ ny p e~(au !n lg ue!lawe~ ~ i • ~i ~.r:~ «i r... _ i i ~;8g~=at~~ae 5~'-~apn~~8_yE ~aE;Y~ 94 . ~.._.. ~ ~ ,•+ ~ ` '~ ,._;-•ti.._..___ - -' ny anal 3 . ~ "°' ° ~~ `~ e ~ fr ti ••~' ~- t - ~ f9Y ~~ ,,. . •~ L ... J = 3 L ,€ g E €'g V ~ l0 o Q ~i-° 'pa a=FS Q' C m LL ss Bz°$i ga'°cF ~ ` N T p84EF `s;; fi € ~ y m gge~~~{°~a~ 6~ ~ 6 ~ S ~ 2 ~ ~ yj ge e ; ~°"t.~g PpE aa~ i $ ~ V `'~ ~ gg~~.a 5.u j~i 1aa s RSx~4 ~ C7 €€do&?E @;~€e P222 STAFF REPORT ADbfINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) WITH A REDUCTION IN THE CURRENT RATE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting an annual special tax levy for Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the special tax to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 7, 2000, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $6,835,000. On December 6, 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 646 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on December 21, 2000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Milliken Avenue, Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard with the street improvements to include but are not limited to demolition and grading, curb, gutter and sidewalks, traffic signals; entry feature and signs; fire hydrants; storm drains; water and sewer improvements; paving; striping; landscaping and irrigation improvements; public utilities and appurtenances. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $5,407,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $544,460 for FY 2011/2012 to $483,880 for FY 2012/2013. This translates to a 11% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment and those savings are passed on to all property owners within this District. Each July 1, commencing July 1, 2012 the Maximum Annual Special Tax will be increased by two percent (2%);pf the amount in effect for the previous fiscal year. The Special Taxes will be levied as follows: (1) The Special Tax will be levied on each Taxable Parcel in an amount equal to 100% P223 APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. JULY 18, 2012 Pncr:2 of the applicable Maximum Annual Special Tax; or (2) If the Special Tax Requirement will be satisfied by an amount less than the Maximum Annual Special Tax the Special Tax will be levied proportionately on each Taxable Parcel at less than 100% of the Maximum Annual Special Tax. For FY 2012/2013 the current rate is sufficient to meet fiscal obligations and there is no need for an increase of the special tax by 2%. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2024-2025. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P224 RESOLUTION NO. 12-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities .District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2012-2013 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established asset forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. . SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds. C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act. P225 D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 2012 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on , 2012. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P226 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2012 P227 Resolution No. ~3~(~3:AI~L`U7 On November 7, 2000, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $6,835,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Milliken Avenue, Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard; such street improvements to include but not to be limited to: demolition and grading, curb, gutter and sidewalks, traffic signals; entry feature and signs; fire hydrants; storm drains; water and sewer improvements; paving; striping; landscaping and irrigation improvements; public utilities and appurtenances. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $5,407,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $544,460 for FY 2011/2012 to $483,880 for 'FY 2012/2013. This translates to a 11 % overall reduction in the annual debt service payment and those savings are passed on to all property owners within this District. Each July 1, commencing July 1, 2012 the Maximum Annual Special Tax will be increased by two percent (2%) of the amount in effect for the previous fiscal year. The Special Taxes will be levied as follows: (1) The Special Tax will be levied on each Taxable Parcel in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Maximum Annual Special Tax; or (2) If the Special Tax Requirement will be satisfied by an amount less than the Maximum Annual Special Tax the Special Tax will be levied proportionately on each Taxable Parcel at less than 100% of the Maximum Annual Special Tax. Therefore, for FY 2012/2013 the current rate is sufficient to meet fiscal obligations and there is no need for an increase of the special tax by 2%. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2024-2025. FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 The annual tax rate for fiscal year 2012-2013 will be $3,980.10 per acre, and will provide sufficient funding for maintenance and operations in the amount of $537,472.00. Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 FY2012/2013 P228 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $483,880.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 35,650.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 CAPITAL PROJECT $401,360.00 $922,390.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 2,910.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 0.00 TRANSFER IN FROM FUND BALANCE .$382,010.00 SPECIAL TAX $537,470.00 $922,390.00 $3,980.10 PER ACRE Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 2 FY2012/2013 _ P229 N O ~ ~, O N O O N O 0 N p ~ ~ J N r a ~I.r f ,a ~_, o C U U ® `~ o w 3 ~ ny ~(Jiay~ N ~ y o i y J 1. o 0 ~ c ~3 y ~ ~ ~, m ~ _ o ~1 y m m L 3 o ° 1 . ~ 1 o ~ Q. .. ._....._.._.._.._.._ ~ ~ V ~ 'i ® i nt> lse3 in v i ny epuenn!33 ' ~ ny epuem43 ~- ! L i ~ ~g ~aaJ~ ~(ea i ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.y i ny Jalsayooa i i ny Jalsayooa ~ .~... V i I ~ ea~l!II!W f._.._.._.._.._ i n ua i i , d ~I.II.W i I i i i i ny uaneH ~ - ~ i my uaneH • i i ny esowJaH ~ ! ny esowJaH i i i- i ny Pleq!yoJV i i^d PIe9!4oJb' i ny uewllaH i -- ~,.-~"~ ny uewllaH •• 1 L ~! L ny p e~(au V' !n 39 ue!lawe~ ~ i ~ app§~'~F~~pfi z B8 r.._..~5_.._.._.._.._•~•• ~ N O O N ~'lg9 f:5~p 1E¢~ 4 ~ c a~0 li Q € =Bi _t i ~-g~3 as #~ ~9 , yy f y ~ !i Y Se.c 6 ~' ~ j ~ y ~ E x3 SS 66 3 N f0 m 55 o G pp p@@p@ a ¢ 9 2 ~ 2 o~ ~~ ` H3 TBp $ e " 3i)a=~g ~g s3 ®aa~~~~~ ~~~ aaa ,,. 8 s _a Cg ~ ~' & 8 ~ ! E ~ 3 E P230 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTR~ITIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT), OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKWAYS WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay for the operation and maintenance of parks and parkways. The Official Statement, Appendix B, Section C Maximum Special Tax -Developed Property 1. (c) authorizes an annual increase. Due to the current economic conditions, no increase is recommended for FY 2012/2013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 16, 2000 the City Council approved Resolution No. 00-149 and established Community Facilities District No. 2000-03. On October 11, 2000 the qualified electors of the District, being the owners of the land within the District, voted to approve the levy of a special tax to pay for certain public services and the administering of such District. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax. The District was authorized to finance park improvements including clearing and grading of park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape landscaping of parks and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north; State Route (210) Freeway to the south; Interstate 15 Freeway to the east and East Avenue to the west. On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2006, the Maximum Special Tax for Developed Property shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. However, the money collected at the current special tax rate along with a portion of fund balance will provide sufficient revenue to meet budgetary operations and maintenance expenses. Therefore, no increase is recommended for FY 2012/2013. P231 CITY COUNCII. S'PeAI~I~ Kf?POIYI' cro2000-03tt )u~.~' 18, 2012 P,~ci•: 2 Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P232 RESOLUTION NO. 12-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "B" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 TO FINANCE THE OPERATION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKAND PARKWAYS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) Special Tax "B" (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax "B" to be collected for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Annual status Report to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. P233 Resolution No. Page SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by the Ordinance, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of Special Tax "B"shall be used, in vyhole or in part, for the following: A. Payment of costs and expenses of the operation and maintenance of authorized parks and parkways and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; B. Payment of an amount necessary to fund or replenish an operating reserve for the costs of the operation of authorized parks and parkways; C. Payment of a proportionate share of Administrative Expenses as such tern is defined in the Modified Rate and Method The proceeds of Special Tax "B" shall be used asset forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: Special Tax "B" shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of Special Tax "B," and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special taz installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P234 Resolution No. Page PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July 2012. Executed this day of July 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P235 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-036 RANCHO SUMMIT ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution Na. JULY 2012 P236 Resolution No. BACKGROUND On August 16, 2000 City Council approved Resolution No. 00-149 and established Community Facilities District No. 2000-03; on October 11, 2000 the qualified electors of the District, being the owners of the land within the District, voted to approve the levy of a special tax to pay for certain public services and the administering of such District. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north; State Route (210) Freeway to the south; Interstate 15 Freeway to the east and East Avenue to the west. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 shall be assigned to a Zone and further classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non-Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11. On each July 1, the Maximum Special Tax B shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. However, the money collected at the current special tax rate along with a portion of fund balance will provide sufficient revenue to meet budgetary operations and maintenance expenses. FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 CFD2000-036 RANCHO SUMMIT Land Use Descriation Classes 1 - 10 Residential Property 11 Non-Residential Property Community Facilities Dis[ric[ 2000-036 FY2012/2013 Residential Floor Area <1,850 Sq. Ft to =>3,450 Sq Ft N/A Assigned Special Tax $1,000.62 $4,863 per Acre 1 P237 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $303,810.00 CITY ADMINISTRATION, $ 45,060.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE $ 54,520.00 CONTRACT SERVICES $ 41,100.00 CAPITAL OUTLAY $ 21,200.00 $465,690.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 8,950.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 3,960.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCE $117,780.00 SPECIAL TAX $335,000.00 $465,690.00 Community Facilities District 2000-03B 2 FY2012/2013 P238 M O ~ ~, O `~ ° C ~, o ~ N ~ o o J o w a 'a ~ w V o ~ ~ ~ CJ d o •. ~ L .~ ny ~(JJay~ ~. C1 y ~ ~ ! r J ~ .._.._.._.._i i y • o O • j C ~ N I~w/ v/ € N m ~ ~ ~ 1 m r 3 .~ _ m o 0 ` j - _.._. ' Q ~ ; ~ . _.._ _.._.._inVlse3 in v i nt/ epuennp3 ' j ny epueM43 ~ ! it :~" i : L i ~ ~ ~g ~aaJ~ ~(ea a_.._.._.._.._.._.._..€ i ny Jalsayooa i n Ja sa oo i y ~ y a i f..~ i i V i ,nV ua~l!II!W r._.._.._.._.._ _ i ny ua~!II!W i i i i i ny uaneH ~ i ny uaneH i ny esowJaH ny esowJaH i n e oJ ~ V PI Q!y V € nV Pleq!4oJV i ny uewllaH i ~.•~" ~ ny uewlfaH i r'' r L te ny pJe~(au v !n 1S ue!lawe~ r•, ~ 5z65..e $e ~.._..~ ~ .._r' Y. _. ._~ _ ii Ab'anOJ~ E g 9% ~€~ 3 ~ ' t € " p i@ 5 yy 'i- ~L? k ,i • ,J - 3 L j E~ 'p ~ ' (0 m p Q ~ ~olggF r'iEJ ° Q ~ LL pp a~s Be$6H ~~Fe p• ~~39 e ' ~ C __ m P S n $ E [8 °z $'giC ggg ~ 3 ~~ O g E~°ae€p~ $$e~3 ~ pa g =a$a~~~a p J T-i U ~ ~ GG Lgg y5'o ayp yp665 y€€ ~ Y ~~ FEf I $ PE6 P239 STAFF REPORT 1~Di\IINISTRdTIVE SERVICES DEPdRTbIENT . Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst II I RANCHO ~,;UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for FY 2012-2013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 11, 2000 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $9,835,000. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax, and on September 21, 2005 approved Resolution No. 05-278 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District was authorized to finance park improvements including clearing and grading of park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape landscaping of parks and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north; State Route (210) Freeway to the south; Interstate 15 Freeway to the east and East Avenue to the west. Bonds were issued on September 1, 2005 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and construction of certain public facilities, park and parkways improvements to serve property located within the District. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P240 RESOLUTION NO. 12-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "A" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code forthe State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous td establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2012-2013 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established asset forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P24t .. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P242 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July, 2012. Executed this day of July, 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P243 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03A RANCHO SUMMIT ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2012 P244 Resolution No. BACKGROUND On June 15, 2005, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-03, (Rancho Summit) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $9,835,000 for the purpose of financing the landscaping of parks and parkways, the acquisition and construction of certain park equipment and the construction of certain street improvements. The landscaping, park improvements and street improvements consist of regular type parks, equestrian facilities, basketball courts, ball fields, open space areas and certain off-site street improvements. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north; State Route (210) Freeway to the south; Interstate 15 Freeway to the east and East Avenue to the west. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 shall be assigned to a Zone and further classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non-Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11. Community Facilities District 2000-03A FY2012/2013 P245 FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 CFD2000-03A RANCHO SUMMIT Land Use Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Description Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Non-Residential Property Residential Floor Area <1,850 Sq. Ft 1,850 - 2,049 Sq. Ft 2,050 - 2,249 Sq. Ft 2,250 - 2,449 Sq. Ft 2,450 - 2,649 Sq. Ft 2,650 - 2,849 Sq. Ft 2,850 - 3;049 Sq. Ft 3,050 - 3,049 Sq. Ft 3,250 - 3,249 Sq. Ft _> 3,450 Sq. Ft N/A Resolution No. Assigned Special Tax $1,707 $1,899 $2,027 $2,046 $2, 061 $2,235 $2,462 $2,527 $2,677 $2,696 $12,600 per Acre Community Facilities District 2000-03A 2 FY2012/2013 P246 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $660,890.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 32,410.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 $694,800.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 9,630.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 8,250.00 TRANSFER IN FROM FUND BALANCE $ 0.00 SPECIAL TAX $713,750.00 $731,630.00 Community Facilities District 2000-03A 3 FY2012/2013 M O ~ ~, O "' O _ 0 O N ~ ° o ~ o > V _, ~ U U a o f i~ ny ti~ay~ d ~ y ~ J ti.. o O ' C ~ N y i ~ _ °_° it ° ~ j •~ N m m t o 3 0 1 li Q (~ i i 1 ^d lSe3 ~ i ny epueM!33 ' ~ ny epuenn!33 ! ~ j ~ ~ i ~ ~8 ~aa~~ ~(ep j ._.._.._.._.._.._.._..1 i ny ~alsayooa !- i i ny ialsayooa Q ...i j / ~ V 1 1 ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._.._ i ny ua~!II!W i i j i ~ j i n uane ~ ~ y. H i my uaneH j j ny esow~aH j - ! ny esow~aH i 1 n e o~` y Pl q!4 d n ' ' i i b PIeQ!4oib i ny uewllaH i - i ~•~" ~ ny uewllaH 1 ~t•• L L ~ ny p ea(au !n lS ue!lawe~ j - i • ~ ~.. i' ~ 1 1 'SY$`asplaa ~~~~ pgi 1~ ~ 1 r .~ "O . V 1 P ~i .y a£S~,Y 555 g3 r.._..~_.._.._.._.._•~° ~ fry O O aD ~$`gl$S~g s'gg$ m Q Ha-~° E w ~ c (0 ~ fs~ Bz ig ~ a Qg'a3 F€ °~n~"s 9E ~ ':a ~ C N 5 ~S~jP y m pp 6~~ ~~~ 66 @ 2. ei4~"iz 9 i9 ~d ~° a yg flfia £oae5 ' ;a ;~ ~Csj~ 2 g e;sea..s ~°SZ~p ~iB l Ss~i[ P I S o e P248 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATR'E SERPICES DEP.~RT1fENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2), SERIES 2001-A WITH A REDUCTION IN THE CURRENT RATE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 & 2), Series 2001-A. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the special tax to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2), Series 2001-A authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,240,000. On August 15, 2001 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001 to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District, including improvements to Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Baseline Road and Arbor Way, landscaping improvements within public right-of-way, storm drain and flood control improvements. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $9,093,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2030-2031. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $1,076,513.75 for FY 2011/2012 to $709,357.50 for FY 2012/2013. This translates to a 36% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment and those savings are passed on to all property owners within this District. P249 STAFF REPORT CFD 2001-O1A JULY 18, 2012 Pnci 2 Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map . P250 RESOLUTION NO. 12-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (IMPROVEMENT AREAS NO. 1 & 2), SERIES 2001-A WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 Series 2001-A) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2012-2013 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P251 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole.or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities. District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any"such collection. P252 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July, 2012. Executed this day of July, 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P253 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 1 AND No. 2 SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2001-A ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2012 P254 Resolution No. BACKGROUND On June 20, 2001, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,240,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The District is generally bordered on the north by Base Line Road, on the west by the Day Creek Flood Control Channel from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard and by the Southern California Edison right-of-way from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road, on the south by Interstate 15 and on the east by Etiwanda Avenue. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 shall be classified as Developed Property, Final Mapped Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, or Undeveloped Property, and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the sections below. The property in Improvement Area No. 1 is residential in use. The property in Improvement Area No. 2 is primarily commercial and contains Victoria Gardens. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $9,093,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2030-2031. By authorizing this refunding City Council approved a savings to the property owners of approximately 9% annually over the remaining life of the bond issues that created a reduction in the annual special tax to each property owner. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $1,076,513.75 for FY 2011/2012 to $709,357.50 for FY 2012/2013. This translates to a 36% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment and those savings are passed on to all property owners within this District. Community Facilities Distric[No.2001-OIA 1 FY2012/2013 P255 Resolution No. FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 CFD 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 1 LAND USE RESIDENTIAL CLASS DESCRIPTION FLOOR AREA ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX 1 Single Family Property => 3,250 Sq Ft $1,269.30 Per Dwelling Unit 2 Single Family Property 2,950 toFY,249 Sq $1,017.86 Per Dwelling Unit 3 Single Family Property 2,650 toFY,949 Sq $815.71 Per Dwelling Unit 4 Single Family Property 2,350 toF ,649 Sq $786.36 Per Dwelling Unit 5 Single Family Property 2,150 toF~,349 Sq $676.36 Per Dwelling Unit 6 Single Family Property 1,950 toFY,149 Sq $650.72 Per Dwelling Unit 7 Single Family Property < 1,950 Sq Ft $566.95 Per Dwelling Unit 8 Apartment Property Not Applicable $143.25 Per Dwelling Unit 9 Non-Residential Property Not Applicable $3,572.13 Per Acre INTERMEDIATE SPECIAL TAX FOR FINAL MAPPED PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL INTERMEDIATE MAXIMUM DESCRIPTION FLOOR AREA SPECIAL TAX Residential Property Not Applicable $6,508.49 Per Acre Non-Residential Property Not Applicable Community Facilities District No. 2001-O1A FY2012/2013 $6,508.49 Per Acre 2 P256 CFD 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 2 LAND USE CLASS DESCRIPTION Apartment Property 2 Other Residential Property Non-Residential Property ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX $143.25.00 Per Dwelling Unit $6,508.49 Per Acre $0.36 Per SO. FT. of Non- Residential Floor Area Community Facilities District No.2001-OIA FY2012/2013 P257 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $774,640.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 61,750.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 $837,890.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 260.00 OTHER REVENUE $ 0.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 16,500.00 TRANSFER IN FROM FUND BALANCE $ 78,900.00 SPECIAL TAX $742,230.00 $837,890.00 Community Facilities District No. 2001-O1A 4 FY2012/2013 ~ Q O ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ O a O rn N W N N N N ~ d v < a w h Y N < ~ v d ~ ~, _ . 0 0 V ~ O~ ~ ~ O E E U •y y ~ ~~ - ^d wa4~ ~ ... ~ N 0 ; .._.._.._.._ ~ J ~ r v ~ ~ ~ d ° ~ •~ ~ c J _ m ~ j d ~ t 3 V i m LL ¢` ~ i j .. ._....._.._.._.._. i® i ny lse3 cn i ~ ~ - ~ L v _.._.._ . . i ny epuenn93 ~ ny epuenn43 C i ~ i ( ' ~g ~aal~ i(e4 ~ ~ j ._.._.._.._.._.._.._..i i ny lalsayooa I V I ny lalsayooa ~..~ j 1 1 ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._.._ ~ j ny ua~!II!W i i j i i i ny uaneH i i i my uaneH i i ny esowlaH j - - - - !ny esowlaH i i nH Ple4!yo1V i i i i^d PIe4!4o1V i i ny uewllaH 1 - ~•~•' • ~ ny uewllaH 1 ~t• t t v i co ny Ple~(au !n s. 3S ue!lawe~ i i j ~~°~?EEj€~ii ES. r ga : : i E ~~ ~ . i ~rI ~ ._ ~ eepsiY~?ExC~ y •~..•• • L ~ e 3 L E.F ca°s~z a~~g ~ ° r.._..Z_.. ~ .._.._ ~ •~ ~ d ~ L. O eo g ggzE s ge `E 5~¢ ~sn~~F£ 4' C N f0 m O lL Q ~ & Eit ~E'sa A~ 'e£~~f i~~ 5 ~ W N m fl •~~~i °UEEv~3 a ° a xaQj~ ~a~6d =ES ~ Y EE3ai!°~~€'~ FzEsgEE B;;; Ii STAFF REPORT ADbIINISTRATIVE SERPICES DEPARTSIENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager ~~j From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services ~ By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III P259 RANCHO C;UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001-B WITH A REDUCTION IN THE CURRENT RATE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No.3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities . District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the special tax to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No.3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the' principal amount of $935,000. On August 15, 2001 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001 to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District, including improvements to Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Baseline Road and Arbor Way, landscaping improvements within public right-of-way, storm drain and flood control improvements. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $812,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. Because of the structuring of the refunding, the savings will vary each year. For each remaining year, the savings will be passed on to all property owners within this District. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2030-2031. P260 STAFF REPORT CFD NO. 2001-O1B Jv>;Y ls, 2012 PAC F. 2 Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P261 RESOLUTION NO. 12-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001-B WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3 Zone 7) Series 2001-B (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2012-2013 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P262 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P263 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July, 2012. Executed this day of July, 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P264 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 3 SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2001-B ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2012 P265 Resolution No. BACKGROUND On June 20, 2001, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $935,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The District is generally bordered on the north by Base Line Road, on the west by the Day Creek Flood Control Channel from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard and by the Southern California Edison right-of-way from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road, on the south by Interstate 15 and on the east by Etiwanda Avenue. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within each Zone of Improvement Area No. 3 shall be classified as Taxable or Non-Taxable Property and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the section below. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $812,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2030-2031. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. Because of the structuring of the refunding, the savings will vary each year. For each remaining year, the savings will be passed on to all property owners within this District. FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 CFD2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 3 TAXABLE ACREAGE BOND SHARE ZONE 1-FUTURE RDA 55.00 91.70% ZONE 7-LEGGIO, 42.74 8.30% MAXIMUM TAX PER ACRE $15,230.37 $1,495.75 Community Facilities District No. 2001-OIB FY2012/2013 P266 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $48,650.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 90.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 0.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 0.00 $48,740.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 0.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCES $ 0.00 OTHER REVENUE $ 0.00 SPECIAL TAX $68,270.00 $88,270.00 Community Facilities District No. 2001-O1 B 2 FY2012/2013 ~- m o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, .=o ~ m o 0 O O (~ W N N ~ M O N ~ ~° ~° `~ `~ N w ~ Y w ~ rn E E ~ .~ '~ a' ~ ~, ° o ° w~ N! _ U G E E ~ o Q ; .._.._.._.._ ~ J ti ~ V ~' 1 m o A, ~= ' c .l GI m ~ . i m m a o (~ ! ii Q 1 i .. .~.._.._.._.._. ®_"_' _' '-j ny;sea cn i _.._.._ ~ .~.G i ny epuenn!33 • , ny epueM!;3 i ~ C 1 ~g ~aaJ~ ~(ea ! •_.._.._.._.._.._.._..I I ny Ja;sayooa i ny Ja;sayooa ~..~ i i - i ny ua>I!II!W f._.._.._.._ - - ! ny ua>I!II!W i i i i i i ny uaneH ! - i ! my uaneH i i nyesowJaH j-- - - !nyesowJaH i I nb' PIe9!4oJ`d i ~ ny Pleq!yoJy ! ny uewllaH i .~•'''n uew a ~ ~ y II H i ter" L t v ny pJe~au !~ lS ue!lawe~ ' 1 i ~ & I S a G s~! a~e{ ,fie @ ~~3 rl p 1 M' i....;1 .• V.. ! I L i l7 ~"eEd Ei~~ ex II ~ ~ g¢ 1 t.._.._ ~ .•~ -p a. L i ~.._~•Y.._..___ _ _~n b'anOJ~ F a S3e gjg~ o~;i4 ~j°~E~~~E~a g2 gp ~ c 0] LL ggg EiE ~ n i c0 ~ . N m g g g ~~ $ C EZ~$a i9$3z; o~ ~ _ ¢ ~ n$ ~ ~ ~ I~ ' ~7 E3 ~ ~$ je § diEiFaEEFaP~! P268 STAFF REPORT 1~DMINItiTR~1TIVF SER\'ICE$ DEPAR'I'~tEN'1' Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III __ RANCHO cUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ZONES 1, 2 & 3, SERIES 2003-A) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 Zones 1, 2 & 3), Series 2003-A. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for FY 2012-2013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1), Series 2003-A authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedhess in the principal amount of $14,645,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax, and on May 21, 2003 approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 147 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 1 (Zones 1, 2 & 3). The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church Street, north of Arrow Route and east of the Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow Route north, to Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard north, to Church Street. The District is located within the Victoria Planned Community. Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003 to share in the provision of funds for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) along with a cultural center owned by the City, including a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. P269 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CFD 2003-O1 IA NO. 1 JULY 18, 2012 Pncr 2 Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P270 RESOLUTION NO. 12-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ZONES 1, 2 & 3) SERIES 2003-A WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to .the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 Zones 1, 2 & 3) Series 2003-A (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2012-2013 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P271 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. . D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above; and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall tie paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P272 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July, 2012. Executed this day of July, 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P273 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 1 SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2003-A ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY 2012 Resolution Na. P274 BACKGROUND Resolution No. On February 19, 2003, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01, Improvement Area No.1 (IA No. 1) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $16,000,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), along with a cultural center owned by the City, including a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. The District is generally bordered on the north by Church Street, on the east by Interstate 15, on the south by Arrow Route and on the west by the a Southern California Edison easement from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard and by Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard to Church Street. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the sections below. FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 CFD2003-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 1 ASSIGNED BACKUP SPECIAL NOTE SPECIAL TAX TAX - ZONE 1 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and Backup PROPERTY $4,318.00/ACRE $4,798.00/ACRE can increase 2% every year ZONE 1 UNDEVELOPED $170.OOIACRE $4 798.00/ACRE Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY , every year ZONE 2 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and Backup PROPERTY $10,500.00/ACRE $40,327.00/ACRE can increase 2% every year ZONE 2 UNDEVELOPED $170.00/ACRE $12,817.00/ACRE Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY every year ZONE 3 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and Backup PROPERTY $8,200.00/ACRE $11,413.00/ACRE can increase 2% every year ZONE 3 UNDEVELOPED $170.00/ACRE $11,413.00/ACRE Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY every year Community Facilities District No. 2003-OIA FY2012/2013 P275 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $1,043,120.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 27,380.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0.00 $1,072,000.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 9,780.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 850.00 TRANSFER IN FROM FUND BALANCE $ 26,080.00 SPECIAL TAX $1,035,290.00 $1,072,000.00 Community Facilities District No. 2003-O1A 2 FY2012/2013 ~ Q _d O ~ ~ r m ~ V] ~„~ O O O W O N W ~ ,~ a N h ~. ~ `F.r ~ 'i a' z ° N o o o y r Q ~ p ~ , C (j O , E E E ff AA /w ~~ 0 i O o ~~~ :--._.._.. ~ v ~ J r v ~ o ~ i a> c _ •~ .~ J m 1 ~' m t 3 a V ~ m ii ¢` ~ i i .. ._..,.._..~._.. i® _. 1 nt/.lse3 in i L ~+ i ny epuem!33 ~ -"-"-' ~ ny epuem!33 ~ i .1 ! - i 1 ~ i ~8 ~aaJ~ ~(ep ._.._.._.._.._.._.._..~ i ny Ja;sayooa !- - i V i ny Ja;sayooa °~..: i i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._ _ i ny ua~!II!W i i i ny uaneH i i i my uaneH. i i ny esowJaH i - - - ! ny esowJaH i 1 ^H PIeQ!4oJt/ ~ - jnV PIe4!4aJV i ny uewllaH i - ~•/" ~ ny uewllaH ~ ~ L L ~I' ~ 1 co 3S ue!lawe~ ~ ~ s~1€s:~~p~s - 1 a'~g Bai s =fa • ' ~ . _r Ty fr ~ ~ N O Q : • ~ ~ ~ m LL E~d ~CS ig 6Pdei TZ~f'~]3C ~ ~ v ~ Ot3 N f0 ~~ - m e__ i<p~ g9°b 3~u iZg E~;n•a 38aE$@ ~ -0a~ ~~ ~ 4 EEan°8V9€e g f F fl~8~~4ie z : P277 STAFF REPORT ADbIINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst II I RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-07 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ZONES 1 & 2, SERIES 2003-B) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2 Zones 1 & 2), Series 2003-B. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for FY 2012-2013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2), Series 2003-B authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,855,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax, and on May 21, 2003 approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 82 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 2 (Zones 1 & 2). The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church Street, north of Arrow Route and east of Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow Route north, to Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard north, to Church Street. The District is located within the Victoria Planned Community. Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003 to share in the provision of funds for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) along with a cultural center owned by the City, including a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P278 RESOLUTION NO. 12-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE 'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013, (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ZONES 1 & 2), SERIES 2003-B WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2 Zones 1 & 2), Series 2003-B) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as.authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses. related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish they='specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. ~:~ti;, ., NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2012-2013 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P279 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes; and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P280 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July, 2012. Executed this day of July, 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P281 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 2 SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2003-B ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2012 P282 Resolution No. BACKGROUND On February 19, 2003, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2003-01, Improvement Area No. 2 (IA No. 2) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,855,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) along with a cultural center owned by the City, including a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. The District is generally bordered on the north by Church Street, on the east by Interstate 15, on the south by Arrow Route and on the west by the a Southern California Edison easement from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard and by Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard to Church Street. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 CFD2003-07 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 2 ASSIGNED BACKUP SPECIAL NOTE SPECIAL TAX TAX ZONE 1 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and Backup PROPERTY $2,502.00/ACRE $3,110.00/ACRE can increase 2% every year ZONE 1 UNDEVELOPED $1 100.00/ACRE $3,110.00/ACRE Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY , every year ZONE 2 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and Backup PROPERTY $7,578.00/ACRE $9,423.00/ACRE can increase 2% every year ZONE 2 UNDEVELOPED $3 650.00/ACRE 423.00/ACRE $9 Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY , , every year Community Facilities District No. 2003-O1B FY2012/2013 P283 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $199,440.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 5,780.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0.00 $ 206,720.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 1,210.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 0.00 TRANSFER IN FROM FUND BALANCE $ 440.00 SPECIAL TAX $205,070.00 $206,720.00 Community Facilities District No. 2003-O16 2 FY2012/2013 ~- m O ~ (T _ N ~ IA ' M O m N N N N C O (/~ W N N p N N ~ `~ a h w N w ~ E _ ~ •Ini Q~ ! (~ G E E O O y ~ ice- ny ti~ay~ ~ ~ o ~; 0 4, N L_.._.._.._.._ ~ v J 1 r V ° y ~ d ~ ~ _ :~, i ~ °_° it 1 N m t 3 ° V ~ ~ Q ~ i j ~ .. ._.._.._.._.._.._. ® ~ ~ i nb'.1se3 in i i L_ !a+ i ny epuenn!33 _.._.._ . i ny epuenng3 ~ ! i .1 i ~8 ~aa~~ .(e4 ® i i .. ._.._.._.._.._.._ _.y i ny ~a~sayaoa - -- V i ny ~a3sayooa ~..~ j ~ 1 ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._..- -- -i ny ua~!II!W i i i i i i ny uaneH ! i - ! my uaneH i i ny esow~aH ~ - (- -- !ny esow~aH i 1 n`d Pley!4a~H ' i inb PIe9!4o~H i ny uewllaH i i ~.•~"~ ny uewllaH ~ 't' L r i co !nyp~e~(au ~ !n ~€s€a!~ ° ! a ~ ~ 1S ue!lawe~ ! ~i~y~g2$L r~•.I' Vi. ~ ~a ~ ~b ia~~~ g a r.._..Z_.._.._.._.._ _ m E s E -p ~ ~ T (6 m O Q LL ._~ g€°~€g~g'~~EE~~s 3 N m g; = m = g94;28gp3e~a igg~~ga2§8 ; ,, ~~ U aoaz•ea~za~ E2~c&Li~~a2 SL STAFF REPORT ADb[INISTRe1TIVESERVlCES DEPdRTDfENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III t; RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for FY 2012-2013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On September 15, 2004 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $45,000,000. On October 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 735 approving the levy of the special tax, and on June 7, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06-185 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on July 13, 2006 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and construction of certain public facilities, to serve property located within the District. The District was authorized to finance the following improvements: (a) Day Creek Boulevard - grading, storm drain, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping; (b) Etiwanda Avenue - grading, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping; (c) Cucamonga Valley Water District ("CVWD") reservoir transmission main; (d) storm drain facilities including the northern property line storm drain and the Etiwanda Avenue storm drain; (e) park facilities; (f) equestrian facilities; (g) school facilities now owned by the Etiwanda School District and by the Chaffey Joint Union High School District; (h) water and sewer facilities now owned by CVWD which were authorized and financed from the proceeds of capacity charges levied by CVWD; (i) flood control facilities now owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District; and,(j) open space also now owned by the County of San Bernardino. P285 P286 CI"I'Y COUNCIL. STAFF REPOR'C cFll 2004-01 )ULY 18, 2012 PAGE2 This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P287 RESOLUTION NO. 12-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2012-2013 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established asset forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is-not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P288 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P289 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July, 2012. Executed this day of July, 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P290 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2012 P291 Resolution No. BACKGROUND On September 2004, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $45,000,000 to pay the costs of issuing the bonds; fund the Reserve Fund for the Bonds and capitalized interest through September 1, 2006; the acquisition and construction of school facilities to be owned by Etiwanda and Chaffey Joint Union High School Districts; flood control facilities to be owned by San Bernardino County Flood Control District; open space to be owned by the County of San Bernardino; park and equestrian facilities; water and sewer facilities to be owned by Cucamonga Valley Water District; and the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Day Creek Boulevard, and Etiwanda Avenue; such street improvements to include but not to be limited to: grading, storm drain, sewer, water, dry utilities and landscaping. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax shall be levied for a period not to exceed fifty years commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-06, provided however that Special Taxes will cease to be levied in an earlier Fiscal Year if the CFD Administrator has determined (i) that all required interest and principal payments on the CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds have been paid; and (ii) all Authorized Facilities have been constructed. Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 FY2012/2013 P292 FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 Land Use Category 1 -Residential Property 2 -Residential Property 3 -Residential Property 4 -Residential Property 5 -Residential Property 6 -Non-Residential Property Developed Floor Area Greater 4,000 sq ft 3801 - 4000 sq ft 3601 - 3800 sq ft 3400 - 3600 sq ft Less than 3400 sq ft NA Maximum Special Tax $5,555 per unit $5,325 per unit $5,151 per unit $4,896 per unit $4,410 per unit $19,813 per acre Land Use Category 1 -Residential Property 2 -Residential Property 3 -Residential Property 4 -Residential Property 5 -Residential Property 6 -Non-Residential Property Developed Floor Area Greater 4,000 sq ft 3801 - 4000 sq ft 3601 - 3800 sq ft 3400 - 3600 sq ft Less than 3400 sq ft NA Actual Special Tax $5,555 per unit $5,325 per unit $5,151 per unit $4,896 per unit $4,410 per unit $14,800 per acre Resolution No. Community Facilities District No. 2004-O1 2 FY2012/2013 P293 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $ 2,836,900.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 27,560.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 11,500.00 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0.00 $ 2,875,960.00 SOURCES: DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 38,500.00 INTEREST REVENUE $ 20,530.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCES $ 0.00 SPECIAL TAX $2,908,790.00 $2,967,820.00 Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 3 FY2012Y2013 O ~ ~ ~, o O w 0 Q N E o J o ° .i , N ; a d ~, y ~ \_ ny lway~ J ~ r ~ 0 ; .._.._.._.._. ~ ~ h ~ ~ _ o y i ~ °_° it •~ ~ h m °° :c g 3 a ` a i V i .. ._..,.._.._.._.._.._ i®~~. in`dlse3 ~ i ~ uenn!33 -"-"-" ny epuem!33 ~ i ~ i ~ ~(ed i .. ._.._.._.._.._.._ _..~ i ny ialsayooa 0 i i ny ~a~sayoob V ,~..~ I i i i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._.._ I ny ua~!II!W i i i i i i ny uaneH ~ -i i my uaneH i i ny esowEaH i ! ny esowiaH i i nH Pleq!4o~H ~ ' . jnb PIeQ!4o~d i ny uewllaH i ~•~" ~ ny uewllaH i ~" `n ~' L L ~ ny p eRau !n iS ue!lawe~ ~ i ~ i°~,iEp ~~i •1 i ~ g ~~:B8 Eda t ~ ..i"~ ~:._. 1 : a~gfnl E~ 77si ~.._.. ! .•E ~ . . `~ .._t-"L.._.._._ _ _t ntf an01~ g g E}?~4 y3a 4 ~ a$ U) C m a' ~ £aa E i$ B e~ 5 ~ C m LL Q q@jt 'c fiy@@ ~s$~6~s d N m ~ ~ Epqpq aa °~~ E~{~ele ° _ f i~ ~e ~;aej ~'~ 'a~6;ja 8. a ~ ' ~~ ~ ~330~ $e° p$ d E E EE e5 2 a &e P295 STAFF REPORT t~DbiINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTbfENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager ~,(^ From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services ~/ By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate for FY 2012-2013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $5,800,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 769 approving the levy of the special tax, and on December 20, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06- 401 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Center Street, north of 26`" Street and west of Haven Avenue. Bonds were issued on January 25, 2007 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and of street improvements, landscape improvements within the public right-of-way, and water and sewer improvements. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map RESOLUTION NO. 12-123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2012-2013 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. P296 SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P297 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes. will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P298 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July, 2012. Executed this day of July, 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P299 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2012 P300 Resolution No. BACKGROUND On October 18, 2006, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2006-01 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $5,800,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of street improvements, landscaping improvements located in public right-of-way, fee related improvements such as transportation, beautification, parks and recreation and drainage, water capacity, water meter and sewer connection fees and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The District is located south of Arrow Route, east of Center Avenue, north of 26`" Street and west of Haven Avenue Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2006-01 shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the section below. FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 CFD 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE Floor Plan Home Size SQ. FT. Tri-Plex Plan 1 1335 Tri-Plex Plan 2 1803 Tri-Plex Plan 3 1920 SFD Plan 4 2188 SFD Plan 5 2627 SFD Plan 6 3173 Number of Units Special Tax 26 $ 2,324.00 26 $ 2,678.00 26 $ 2,774.00 28 $ 3,109.00 28 $ 3,379.00 22 $ 3,687.00 156 Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 FY2012/2013 P301 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $377,110.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 17,220.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 2,500.00 $396,830.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 4,500.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 0.00 TRANSFER IN FROM FUND BALANCE $ 0.00 SPECIAL TAX $446,060.00 $450,560.00 Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 2 FY2012/2013 O ~ ~, N O O ~ O E o J N y.+ a' c ~ ~ (~ o i ~ o ~~ y ~ ~~ - ny J(JJay~ N i.f J ~ ,_ ~n Q ; .._.._.._.._ ~ ~ ! c o N m ~ yr j ~ L_ 3 i m o 0 .~ ~i Q V i ~ .. ._....._.._.._.._. _ ' I® ~ ny ise3 vJ i L i ~ ny epuenn!13 _.._.._.. ~ ny epuenn43 ~ i C i i 1 ~8 >IaaJ~ lea i ny Jalsayooa ! - 0 i i ny Jalsayaoa V ,~..~ i i i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._..- - ny ua>I!II!W i i i i i i ny uaneH ~ -i i ® my uaneH i i ny esowJaH ~ ! ny esowJaH i ~ ny Ple4!4oJH ~ jnV Ple4!4oJV ny uewllaH i ~•~" ~ ny uewllaH j 't" t t v ny p e/Iau!n 3S ue!lawe~ i i $~iE?'t~ ~~2 / a bE~~~~~g°g¢ N d `~ j'~ y *$- 1_. •'..I•• UJ C m ~ (A fiYeEs9 ap~ °.f '~ N p Y 8 iE aF. f ~ ~ m u_ E~~~~~E~"~~~ ~ = m ~~~ ~~~~~n~a 6;an°S ~!" ` ' BLdoffEB~%2€e STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMEN'P Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager P303 t RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate for FY 2012-2013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,980,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 770 approving the levy of the special tax, and on December 20, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06- 402 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located south of Garcia Drive, east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of East Avenue. Bonds were issued on January 25, 2007 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition of street improvements, landscape improvements within the public right-of-way, and water and sewer improvements. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map RESOLUTION NO. 12-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2012-2013 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. P304 SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P305 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P306 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July, 2012. Executed this day of July, 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P307 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 AMADOR ON ROUTE 66 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2012 P308 Resolution No. BACKGROUND On October 18, 2006, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2006-02 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $2,980,000 to provide financing for a portion of the cost of for the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of street and transportation, landscaping, dry utilities, parks and recreation, drainage, water and sewer in addition to the engineering, design, planning, permitting and construction, coordination, together with other incidental costs. The District is located south of Garcia Drive, east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of East Avenue. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2006-02 shall be classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the section below. FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 CFD 2006-02 AMADOR ON ROUTE 66 Land Use Description Residential Floor Class Area 1 Single Family < 1,850 Sq. Ft. Detached Property 2 Single Family 1,601 - 1,850 Sq. Detached Property Ft. 3 Single Family 1,351 - 1,600 Sq. Detached Property Ft. 4 Single Family >1,351 Sq. Ft. Detached Property 5 Non-Residential N/A Property Maximum # of Special Tax Units $2,816 per unit 33 $2,697 per unit 33 $2,469 per unit 0 $2,241 per unit 33 $64,747 per acre 0 99 Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 FY2012/2013 P309 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $193,990.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 17,200.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 2.000.00 $213,190.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 2,280.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $ 0.00 SPECIAL TAX $245,640.00 $247,920.00 Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 2 FY2012/2013 N ~ O _ ~~ ~ N O O N ~ O N ~ O O J o w Q C U V `o ~ \_ ny /ways y t J ~ ~ O ; ._.._.._.._. ~ ~ d o y ~ i ~ _ ~ 7~1 ! ~ O] L p ~ ~ LL Q 1 i .. •..._.._.._.._.._4 ® !nV lse3 in i ^ ~ a i ny epuenn!;3 _.._.._.. ; ny epuem!33 ,~ i ~ i C ! i i i ~i8 >laaJ~ ~(ea .. ._.._.._.._.._.._ _..~ i ny Ja;sayooa i O i i ny Ja;sayooa f • ,~..~ V j I I ny uaJl!II!W f._.._.._.._.._ - i ny ua~!II!W i i i i j j ny uaneH ! ! i jny uaneH j ny esowJaH i - i ny esowJaH i ~ nd Pleq!yoJH - ' Pleq!yoJy jnb i ny uewllaH i fir" ~ ny uewllaH i f° t t ~ ! ny pJe~(au V !n ~ ! E a~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ F S F$,Fg, ,s: 1 '~ ~ ~.._. .._~ _ ~ ~ae4€ a.~,~Sg T ~946 e ~ ~gg t:E 4 ~ = m { 6k y y ¢{ $ 55gp E'~~L~d E;e l~ ~~ laa~i~e;~6 ~~ ~s~ U 6sad$$b ~ x o nEie iid F ~ P311 STAFF REPORT - ADD~QNI$TRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTb4ENT RANCHO Date: July 18, 2012 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY FOR THE COSTS INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1, MASI PLAZA RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing an annual levy for the costs incurred in the collection of assessments within Assessment District No. 93-1, Masi Plaza. No action is required to set the annual special assessment for this districts as the special assessments were established during formation of the district and remain unchanged through the life of the bonds, pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 4,1997, $2,990,000 in bonds were issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City') pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Bond Law"). All of the proceedings of the City to form the District, to levy the assessments and to acquire the improvements described and being financed with the proceeds of the bonds had been undertaken pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Improvement Act"), and Resolution of Intention No. 97-104 adopted by the City Council on February 19, 1997. The District, comprising approximately 23.64 acres, is situated along the south side of Foothill Boulevard and the west side of Rochester Avenue and consists of twenty-five developed lots subject to assessment. Proceeds of the bonds were used to acquire certain streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, traffic signal, water, sewer, storm drainage, public amenities and certain public utility improvements, constructed within the District and necessary for the existing and proposed development within the District. The Method of Assessment for the District was determined by the Assessment Engineer. The acquisition costs and proportionate share of the incidental costs for bid items were spread on a net assessable acreage basis to those areas or subareas of the District that specifically benefited from the works of improvements to be acquired. The Assessment Engineer determined that the special benefits received from the above cited works of improvements were in direct proportion to the number of assessable net acres of the record lots. The assessments were spread over all parcels within the boundary based-upon its proportion of the total assessable acreage within the District. Net assessable acreage for all lots within the District was taken directly from the "per lot" net acreage shown on the recorded parcel without offset for easements. P312 STAFF REPORT A.D.93-1 JULY 1s, zolz PACr:2 number of assessable net acres of the record lots. The assessments were spread over all parcels within the boundary based upon its proportion of the total assessable acreage within the District. Net assessable acreage for all lots within the District was taken directly from the "per lot" net acreage shown on the recorded parcel without offset foreasements. Section 8682 of the Government Code authorizes cities to collect an annual assessment fee of a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of installments and not to exceed sixteen dollars per parcel assessment for costs incurred in the administration and assessment collection. The requested fee will allow the City to recover funds for collection and management of assessment districts that are applicable to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. Rancho Cucamonga's comprehensive management program including record keeping, cost management, payoff calculations, monthly financial reports, debt service schedules, as well as providing information to the public is funded from this fee. This fee is in place now to pay for administration and will allow the City to maintain the current rate and level of service. The assessment shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through FY 2022-2023. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P313 RESOLUTION NO. 12-125 A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has heretofore undertaken proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" being Division 12 ofthe Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed assessments upon land within various special assessment districts (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Assessment Districts"); and WHEREAS, said proceedings provided for and the City did subsequently issue bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said bonds representing unpaid assessments within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, the City does incur necessary administrative expenses in the collection ofthe annual installments of the assessment within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, Govemment Code Section 8682 does authorize the City to establish an assessment surcharge to allow the City to recover its expenses of collection of said assessments; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish such an assessment surchazge as authorized by said Government Code Section 8682. NO W THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals aze all true and correct. SECTION 2: Treasurer is hereby directed to add to the annual installment of assessments within the Assessment Districts a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of the installments and of the interest thereon, not to exceed the Treasurer's estimate of the expenses of collection. Said expenses of collection shall include the necessary administrative expenses of the City incurred in providing the County Auditor with current information regarding the ownership or division of the affected lots or pazcels of land within the Assessment Districts to ensure the proper entry by the County Auditor in his or her assessment roll and the timely collection of the Assessment installments. P314 SECTION 3: The above assessment surcharge, when collected, shall belong to the City and shall cover the expenses and compensation of the Treasurer incurred in the collection of the assessments, and of the interest and penalties added on to the assessments. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July 2012. Executed this day of July 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P315 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-01 MASI PLAZA ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2012 P316 Resolution No. BACKGROUND On August 4,1997, $2,990,000 in bonds were issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City") pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Bond Law"), a Resolution authorizing issuance of the Bonds adopted by the City Council on June 18, 1997 (the "Bond Resolution") and a Bond Indenture, dated as of June 1, 1997 (the "Indenture"), by and between the City and the Fiscal Agent. All of the proceedings of the City to form the District, to levy the assessments and to acquire the improvements described and being financed with the proceeds of the bonds had been undertaken pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Improvement Act"), and Resolution of Intention No. 97-104 adopted by the City Council on February 19, 1997. Proceeds of the bonds were used to acquire certain streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, traffic signal, water, sewer, storm drainage, public amenities and certain public utility improvements, constructed within the District and necessary for the existing and proposed development within the District. The Method of Assessment for the District was determined by the Assessment Engineer. The acquisition costs and proportionate share of the incidental costs for bid items were spread on a net assessable acreage basis to those areas or subareas of the District that specifically benefited from the works of improvements to be acquired. The Assessment Engineer determined that the special benefits received from the above cited works of improvements were in direct proportion to the number of assessable net acres of the record lots. The assessments were spread over all parcels within the boundary based upon its proportion of the total assessable acreage within the District. Net assessable acreage for all lots within the District was taken directly from the "per lot" net acreage shown on the recorded parcel without offset for easements. The District, comprising approximately 23.64 acres, is situated along the south side of Foothill Boulevard and the west side of Rochester Avenue and consists of twenty-five developed lots subject to assessment (the "Assessment Parcels"). The following is a list of businesses located within the District: Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 FY2012/2013 P317 Resolution No. Building Lot APN 1 1 22901211 2 2 22901212 3 3 22901213 4 4 22901214 5A 5 22901215 5B 5 22901215 6 6 22901216 7 7 22901217 8 8 22901218 9 9 22901219 10 10 22901220 11 & 11 27 22901230 12A 12 22901221 126 12 22901221 13 13 22901222 14 14 22901223 15A 15 22901224 156 15 22901224 16A 16 22901231 166 16 22901231 16C 16 18A 20 186 21 18& 19A 19 17& 196 18 20 22 24 24 25 25 26 26 11 & 27 27 22901232 22901266 22901264 22901267 Tenants EZ Lube Shell Service Station and Subway Sandwiches Jack in the Box Taco Hut, Popeye's Chicken, 2Empty Suites, and Manila Sunset Grille Cucamonga Brewing Company, Jam It Music Abi Sabi Teppan Steak House & Sushi Bar Denny's Restaurant Empty Suite, #1 Pho Noodle & Grill, Stadium Dental Orthodontics', and Empty Suite Goodyear Tires Executive Auto Shop (Toyota and Nissan), Empty Suite Lim's Honda, Acura and Mazda 24 Hour Fitness Bark and Bones Boutigue, Legends Nails, and Nutrition 4 Less three Empty Suites, Sunshine Foot Massage, Ghomri Restaurant Group Designer Suits Outlet, Empty Suite Empty Suite, and Heartless Art Boutique Tattoo Shop Vista Paint, Roger Dunn Golf Shop, 1 Empty Suites, and Tropicana Restaurant Engrave'N Embrodier, Rancho Computer's, Empty Suite SummitRidge Church, Farmers Insurance and three Empty Suites Five Empty Suites Five Empty Suites Two Empty Suites, 3 Suites for Haven Interactive, State Farm, Chabot Wealth Management Parking Lot Six Empty Suites Pacific Century Investments, and Four Empty Suites Mountain View Oral Surgery, True Beauty Aesthetic and one Empty Suite 22901268 Five Empty Suites Matrix Institute of Addiction Suites 102 A & B and one 22901269 Empty Suite Expert Auto Service, Windshields of Cucamonga, Smog 22901261 Stop and Custom Auto Parts and Fabrication 22901235 Eurotech Imports, Allstar Auto Center and Empty Suite 22901236 Empty Suite- 22901230 24 Hour Fitness Bonds for the District are scheduled to be paid off in September of 2022. Community Facilities District No. 2000-O1 2 FY2012/2013 P318 Resolution No. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $237,840.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, $ 4,490.00 GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES $ 1,500.00 $243,830.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 4,830.00 SPECIAL TAX $245,280.00 $250,110.00 Community Facilities District No. 2000-O1 3 FY2012/2013 STAFF REPORT P320 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 18, 2012 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director By: Karen Silhanek, Management Analyst I Subject: APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGARDING PROPOSED FEE MODIFICATIONS FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES AND FACILITIES OPERATED BY THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission pertaining to proposed annual fee modifications for program activities and facilities operated by the Community Services Department. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On an annual basis, the Community Services Department analyzes Department fees and charges and recommends modifications to the Fees and Charges Schedule to reflect identified needs from the previous year. As a part of this process, the Department presents the proposed modified fee schedule to the Park and Recreation Commission for their review and modification as deemed appropriate. The Commission then forwards its recommendation to the City Council for their consideration. This year's fee revisions are minor in nature and continue to work towards streamlining and organizing the presentation of information into an applicant/staff user-friendly format. Modifications include the following: ^ Clarifying language on facility use during operating hours has been added to the Facility User Group Classification Chart and Description (page 1) and City Indoor Facility Usage Policy (pages 2 and 3). ^ A Registration Fee of $1.00 has been added (page 4) to each class and activity registration. The dollars collected will be used to replace equipment in the Department's recreation facilities and buildings previously funded from the City's General Fund and RDA Capital Reserves. Department equipment sustains heavy use throughout the year by program participants and a rotation schedule of replacement is necessary. P321 REVIEW OF PROPOSED FEE MODIFICATIONS FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES AND FACILITIES OPERATED BY THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT JULY 18, 2012 PAGE 2 ^ An increase in the annual user fee from $12.00 to $15.00 for Senior Wellness Pass Program (page 5) is being recommended. This is the first time this fee has been increased since the establishment of a user fee in January 2010. The Senior Advisory Committee also reviewed this fee at their regular meeting on May 21, 2012 and was supportive of the increase. ^ A Cancellation Fee (page 5) has been added for consideration this year to help recoup costs for administrative time spent on rental applications when a customer cancels their event/program. The Cancellation Fee includes a "7 Day Grace Period." Should a customer cancel their event within seven calendar days of the initial application, then no cancellation fee would be assessed. The fee addresses event planners that hold prime rental spots at multiple venues then cancel once they select a non-City venue with minimal consequence. ^ New fees are being requested for the Arena at the Equestrian Center (page 8) as well as a mechanism for cost recovery of actual costs for lights at the Center. ^ Three additional room fees (Guasti, Opici and the Small Kitchen) are being recommended for Lions Center West to allow for additional rental space at this facility (page 8). The addition of these amenities at Lions West will provide additional space for reserved/rental use by the community. These fees are consistent with rates of similar rooms at other facilities. ^ Minor additions have been added to the lists of Facility Equipment Use Fees (Community Facilities -page 9 and Cultural Center -page 11) to better reflect the equipment that the public is currently requesting be available at City facilities for rent. ^ Fees for use by Victoria Gardens Cultural Center renters for the new video marquee are noted on page 11. The addition of fees will allow the Department to make the marquee available to rental clients at the Cultural Center and to recover costs for its use and upkeep. ^ Clarification language has been added to the Filming in Neighborhood and Community Parks section of the Fee Schedule (page 12) to provide additional information on the process of requirements for filming in the City's parks. This is an area of rentals that has seen increased interest from the public. The fees assessed are actually fees charged by the Planning Department, but are included as part of this Fee Schedule because most inquiries originate in Community Services. P322 REVIEW OF PROPOSED FEE MODIFICATIONS FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES AND FACILITIES OPERATED BY THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT JULY 18, 2012 PAGE 3 ^ Picnic Shelter Rental Fees (page 12) are recommended to be increased this year to partially recover costs associated with maintaining these amenities, which traditionally have not been covered (fees have been used to partially recover costs incurred by Community Services for renting the picnic shelters). The City's rates are comparable to surrounding cities as well as benchmark cities that the City annually surveys. ^ The fees for the City's Special Event Areas (page 13) continue to be refined based upon historical use. These event areas are adjacent to or near large picnic areas at Red Hill and Heritage Parks and designated areas at Central Park. To encourage large groups to reserve these areas, sometimes in conjunction with large picnic shelter rentals that ultimately impact the park open space, the fees are being recommended to be lowered. An additional feature, the Central Park Bridge is being recommended to be added to the fee schedule, as this is an amenity at Central Park that would be of benefit to the community as a reservable space. A notation is recommended to be added to the fee table on page 13 for the future Central Park Pavilion. ^ Minor clarification language is being recommended to be added on page 15 and 16 to the table for Epicenter Parking Area Rental Fees and Epicenter Filming Rental Fees, respectively. The recommended fee increase is from $2,000-$5,000 per day to $3,000-$6,00 for Commercial/For Profit Filming at the Epicenter. Additionally, the recommended fee for Commercial/For Profit Still Photography has been lowered (from $1,000-$2,000 per day to $500-$2,000 per day). These fee changes are being recommended based upon comparable rates to surrounding cities with similar facilities as well benchmark cities that the City annually surveys. One general note to the attached Fee Schedule is that proposed deletions to the Department's fees are noted in the attached document in and proposed changes/additions are noted in red type. Should the City Council approve the recommendation by the Park and Recreation Commission, it is anticipated that the new fees for program activities and facilities operated by the Community Services Department would take effect on or after December 1, 2012. Respectfully submitted, ~e~-« l~~r~s Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director Attachments P323 s~ ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Services Department COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2012I'i3 FEES AND CHARGES SCHEDULE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATfON FOR APPROVAL ON JUNE 21 , 20 1 2 PROPOSED CHANGES FOR 201 2/201 3 DRAFT TO CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL: JULY i 8, 2012 )ACES L. ~_~ P324 c`S`~~~ Cv~r` ~~~~~G~ RANCHO CUCAMONW Community Servkes Depanment Community Services Department 2012113 Fees and Charges Schedule FACILITY USER GROUP CLASSIFICATION CHART AND DESCRIPTION ...........................1 CITY INDOOR FACILITY USEAGE POLICY ............................................................... 2 GENERAL PROGRAM FEES AND FEE POLICIES ................................................................. 4 INDOOR FACILITY ROOM RENTAL FEES ..............................................................................7 Central Park - Goldy S. Lewis Community Center ............................................. ............................. 7 Central Park -James L. Brulte Senior Center .................................................... ............................. 7 Civic Center Courtyard ....................................................................................... ............................. 8 Equestrian Center .............................................................................................. .............................8 Lions Center East .............................................................................................. ............................. 8 Lions Center West ............................................................................................. ............................. 8 .............. RC Family Resource Center ................................................................ ................. 9 ............ RC Family Sports Center -Courts ..................................................................... ......... .................... RC Family Sports Center -Rooms .................................................................... ............................. 9 Victoria Gardens Cultural Center ....................................................................... ........................... 10 OUTDOOR PARK FACILITY RENTAL FEES AND FEE POLICIES ...................................... 12 Park Picnic Shelters ......................................................................................................................12 Red Hill Community Park Amphitheater ........................................................................................ 12 Special Event Areas ...................................................................................................................... 12 PARK SPORTS FIELD RENTAL FEES AND FEE POLICIES ................................................14 General Park Sports Field Fee Policies .............................................. ........................................... 14 Sports Fields Rental Fees and Deposits ............................................ ........................................... 14 Sports Field Lighting Fees ................................................................. ...........................................14 Snack Bar Rental Fees and Deposits ................................................. ...........................................14 Storage Rooms Fees and Deposits .................................................... ...........................................14 EPICENTER RENTAL FEES AND DEPOSITS .......................................................................15 Epicenter Community Sport Fields Rental Fees and Deposits ...................................................... 15 Epicenter Stadium Complex Facilities Rental Fees .......................................................................15 Epicenter Parking Area Rental Fees ............................................................................................. 15 Epicenter Special Event Area Fees .................................................................................15 Epicenter Filming Rental Fees ...................................................................................................... 16 Epicenter Stadium Service Fees and Deposits ..............................................................................16 P325 GROUP Qualifying Type of Function Specifications Organization Outside Govemmental Programs, meetings or events Govemmental agencies having an approved, written Agencies (RC Resident that directly serve the Rancho partnership with the City. Group 1 facility users are only Benefit Use) Cucamonga community and permitted at specified facilities indicated on the fee fulfill the mission of the schedule. At facilities where Group 1 users are not organization. permitted, these Groups shall pay Group 2 rates. If a Group 1 user wishes to San Bernardino County groups will be limited to rentals during use a facility for a purpose operating hours of Lions East, Lions West and the RC Family other than above, they will be Sports Center, Monday -Friday, with reservations allowed no classified as Group 3 user. more than 3 months in advance. One Saturday rental per month will be permitted at the RC Family Sports Center. All other requested times will be charged Group 2 rates. Non-profit civic, athletic, Programs, meetings or events Compliance with City Non-Profit Eligibility Policy is social organizations, that directly serve the Rancho required to receive Group 2 status. churches and schools Cucamonga community or the based in Rancho mission of the organization. 2 Cucamon a. Group 2 facility rental rates are highly discounted to allow for consistent and affordable use of facilities by non-profit groups serving City residents. To insure consistency among user groups, the City cannot consider rental fee waivers by Group 2 users. Approved RC non-profit youth serving organizations are permitted one free Board meeting or membership meeting once per month. These groups may also use one room for participant registration without charge up to two times a year prior to their season/event for up to four hours per use. These free uses are only available at Lions Community Centers or Family Sports Center as space permits. Outside Govemmental Eventslprograms that do not Events/programs not directly providing a service to the Agencies (Non-RC Benefit meet Group 1 criteria. Rancho Cucamonga community, or not fulfilling the Use} mission of the organization. Resident non-profit Private events/programs that Events/programs not directly providing a service to the organizations do not meet Group 2 criteria. Rancho Cucamonga community. City Residents Any approved function Employee Organizations An ap roved function Political Candidates Any approved function Political0 anizations 3 Non-resident non-profit, Any approved function civic, social organizations and schools City commercial, business Any approved function and profit making organizations Non-residents Any ap roved function 4 Non-resident employee Any approved function organizations, commercial, business and profit making organizations and churches City of Rancho Cucamonga Events, meetings and No rental fees on week days during Operating Hours. CI~ programs which are directly Group 2 rates will apply during Extended Hour use. . hosted and coordinated by a Costs for additional staff or equipment must be City Department for official recovered from the sponsoring Department. See business. separate City Departments Facility Use Policy. City of Rancho Cucamonga Events, meetings and No rental fees Costs for additional staff or equipment CSD Community Services programs which are directly must be recovered from the program budget. Department hosted and coordinated by the Community Services Department. P326 Definitions: City Meetings and/or trainings which exclusively involve Rancho Cucamonga City staff, City Council, Meetings: Commissions, Boards and facilitator(s). (City related meetings which involve outside agencies are a Group 1 Rental Group Classification) Meetings and/or trainings involving City staff from multiple agencies, in which the City of Rancho Cucamonga has a financial partnership that requires a proportional use of each city's facilifies. These partnership organizations to be approved by the CSD Director. (Other City related trainings which involve outside agencies are a Group 1 Rental Group Classification) Community Activities that are planned and managed directly by City staff specifically for the residents of Rancho Activities: Cucamonga Activities that are planned by the City's County, State or National elected officials specifically for the residents of Rancho Cucamonga Lions EastlVNest Victoria Gardens Victoria Gardens Facilities: Family Resource Center Central Park Cultural Center - Cultural Center - Family Spurts Center Celebration Hall Lewis Family Playhouse The Lewis Family Celebration Hall is designed Playhouse is used Central Park is the for higher end paying rental exclusively for City's premier clients and is intended to Playhouse season USe These Community Centers Community Center generate rental revenue to rehearsals and PhIlOSO h P Y are the first choice for city and should be used support programming at the presentations, meetings. for larger and more Cultural Center. Weekday Playhouse and Library significant meetings attemoons are utilized for major special events and activities. Playhouse and Library with professional programming. entertainers and paying rental clients. No-fee City use is limited to All City meetings/ 1) Special Workshops held trainings and by the City Council and 2) community activities Meetings and/or trainings as defined above are involving staff from multiple Playhouse use is All City meetingsJtrainings permitted at these agencies, in which the City of limited to season and and community activities as facilities for no fee, as RC has a financial Library programming Allowable defined above are permitted available. No-fee use partnership that requires a and paying rental Clt Uses y at these facilities for no fee, of Central Park by proportional use of each city's clients only. Other as available. Group 2 rates specified elected facilities (use is limited to the uses at the discretion of apply during Extended Hours officials is limited to City's proportional share). the CSD Director. use. one use per calendar These partnership year per elected organizations to be approved official. Group 2 rates by the CSD Director. apply during Playhouse and Library have Extended Hours use. a separate programming schedulin a reement. P327 Lions EastlWest Victoria Gardens Victoria Gardens Facilities: Family Resource Center Central Park Cultural Center - Cultural Center - Family Sports Center Celebration Hall Lewis Family Playhouse Approved City use (as allowed above) is limited to weekdays during facility open hours and must end Available during before 2 pm. Uses may be Paying rentals will be Scheduling Available during facility open weekday facility open scheduled up to a maximum considered up to a Restrictions hours. No free weekend or hours. No free of 10 months in advance. maximum of 3 months in holiday uses permitted. weekend or holiday City uses on weekdays after advance uses permitted. 2 pm will only be considered . up to a maximum of 3 months in advance, if no activities are scheduled. No free weekend or holida uses ermitted. All meals must be purchased by requesting Department through in-house caterer. Approved meetings which only require beverage service or light snacks may purchase them through the No special in-house Cafe service, or conditions. arrange to have requesting No special conditions. Requesting Department staff bring them Requesting Department to Department to pay for and set them up at their cost. All rental and staff fees pay for extraordinary staff or extraordinary staff or In the event the requesting must be paid. All facility COnditionS equipment costs. All facility equipment costs. All Department decides to bring users must complete the Of USe users must complete the facility users must their own snacks, they will be Facility Request Form Facility Request Form and go complete the Facility responsible for all supplies, and go through the through the approval Request Form and go materials, serving equipment approval process. process. through the approval and clean-up since no resources will be available at process. the facility. Requesting Department to pay for extraordinary staff or equipment costs. All facility users must complete the Facility Request Form and go through the approval process. P328 Alcohol Use Fees: Alcohol Use is permitted only at approved alcohol use City facilities (Central Park, Rancho Cucamonga Famil~r Resource Center and the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center). An additional $500.00 Rental Deposit and a $50.° Administration Fee will be required for alcohol use rentals. City Staff Fees: One staff person is included in the rental fees as listed during regular operating hours and additional staff may be required depending on the type of event, as determined by the Community Services Department. Additional fee for staff is required for all rentals that occur during extended hours. • $15.00 per hour for Community Services Building staff for all facilities ^ $20.00 per hour for Technical/Front of House/Box Office staff at the Lewis Family Playhouse ^ $15.00 per hour for Celebration Hall Rental Assistant • $80.00 per hour for Front of House Services (staff and/or volunteers) at the Lewis Family Playhouse ClasseslWorkshops/Programs: Classes and workshops shall be structured on acost-covering basis, and fees shall be set based upon the market rate of similar programs provided in the cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario and Upland. Refunds and transfers for classes, workshops and programs will be issued in full if requested prior to the start of the program. After the start of the program, participants may request a refund before the second program meeting date, minus a $10 refund fee. After the second program meeting date, no refunds will be issued. • Exception to the Rule: Aquatics, Youth Sports/Pee Wee Sports have the following refund/credit policy needs to be applied. Aquatics - Refunds/credits can 6e given if requested by the Wednesday prior to the start of each session. After the start of the session no refunds/credits will be issued. Youth Sports/Pee Wee Sports - Refunds/credits will be issued one month prior to league games. Less than one month prior to league games refunds/credits will be issued minus a $10 administration fee. After the first league game or Pee Wee practice, no refunds/credits will be issued. Community Services Department Partnerships: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department may enter into written agreements with organizations to provide services to residents of Rancho Cucamonga. In such cases, the terms and fees associated with such agreements will be negotiated by staff and approved by the Community Services Director. Registration Fee: A $1.00 Registration Fee will be charged per class or activity registration that will be applied to a fund to repair or replace equipment in Community Services facilities. This fee does not apply to drop-in programs, free programs or building rentals. Non-Resident Charge: A $12.00 fee shall be paid by each non-resident, each class, each team member, each season, to participate in City-sponsored classes. Said fee is payable at the time of registration. Non-Resident Charge does not include one-day activities or any trips sponsored by the City. P329 Senior Transportation Program: A $25.00 annual user fee is applied to all residents using the Senior Transportation Program. Senior Wellness Pass Program: A $~~8 $15.002 annual user fee is applied to all senior citizen residents using the Senior Wellness Pass Program. Replacement badges: $2.00 for first replacement and $5.00 for each additional. Application Fee: A non-refundable application fee of $25.00 will be applied to every facility rental request. This fee is collected as part of the facility rental deposit and will be retained upon return of the rental deposit. Cancellation Fees: In the event the renter requests a cancellation of their rental event after 7 calendar days from the time off application, a cancellation fee is withheld from any fees paid and/or the rental deposit as follows: ^ $25 for small room rentals • $50 for medium or large room rentals • $75 for full event hall rentals • $100 for the Lewis Family Playhouse° 7 Day Grace Period: Requests for cancellation received within 7 calendar days of the initial application will not be assessed a cancellation fee. Refunds of facility rental fees (excluding the Application and Cancellation Fee) will be processed as follows for all facilities excluding the Lewis Family Playhouse: ^ 30 or more calendar days prior to scheduled rental event -full refund of rental fees, equipment fees and rental deposit (less the $25 Application Fee and Cancellation Fee if applicable) ^ 15-29 calendar days prior to scheduled rental event -full refund of rental fees, equipment fees (less the $25 Application Fee and Cancellation Fee if applicable) and full forfeiture of rental deposit' ^ 2 to 14 calendar days prior to scheduled rental event - 50% refund of all rental and equipment fees (less the $25 Application Fee and Cancellation Fee if applicable) and full forfeiture of rental deposit' ^ Less than 2 calendar days prior to scheduled rental event -Forfeiture of all fees - rental and equipment fees and rental deposit' and application fee. ''If deposit exceeds estimated amount of rental fees, then 100% of rental and equipment fees will be forfeited and the balance will be refunded. P330 Cancellation Policy -Celebration Hall and Lewis Family Playhouse: Refunds of facility rental fees (excluding the Application and Cancellation Fee) will be processed as follows: ^ 60 or more calendar days prior to scheduled rental event -full refund of rental fees, equipment fees and rental deposit (less the $25 Application Fee and Cancellation Fee if applicable) ^ 30 to 59 calendar days prior to scheduled rental event -full refund of rental fees, equipment fees (less the $25 Application Fee and Cancellation Fee if applicable) and full forfeiture of rental deposit* ^ 14 to 29 calendar days prior to scheduled rental event - 50% refund of all rental and equipment fees (less the $25 Application Fee and Cancellation Fee if applicable) and full forfeiture of rental deposit* ^ Less than 14 calendar days prior to scheduled rental event -Forfeiture of all fees - rental and equipment fees and rental deposit' and application fee. *If deposit exceeds estimated amount of rental fees, then 100% of rental and equipment fees will be forfeited and the balance will be refunded. Community Center Facility Rentals: Hourly fees are based upon weekday Operating Hours Use. An increased rate for weekend Extended Hours Use will be applied to Friday night use after 5:00 p.m. and for all use on Saturday, Sunday and open holidays. ..... Rental of Central Park requires a four (4) hour minimum charge for Friday after 5pm, Saturday, and Sunday. .....Rental of the RC Family Resource Center is subject to facility policies and Group 1 rentals are limited to use by Partners. ..... Lions Community Centers East and West is the designated rental facility for Group 1 users. Facility Decorating Discount: Rooms may be reserved for up to two (2) hours prior to and after the event at the rate of 50% of the normal room rental rate for the purposes of set-up and removal of decorations on all rentals over 4 hours in duration. Overtime Fee: For rentals that go over in time from their rental contract and/or are requesting an early entry on the day of a fee will be assessed equal to staff cost plus rental fee to be calculated at a rate of time-and-a-half. Rental Deposits: A Rental Deposit is charged for all rentals at City facilities and will be returned as long as there is no damage to the facility, no overage of time and the renter has been compliant with the rental policies of the Department. An Additional Rental Deposit may be required according to event/rental requirements and the City's risk assessment. P331 -• -•- • ~ Operating Hours • Extended Hours Room Name Croup 1 Croup 2 Group 3 Group 4 Room Name Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Room Sizc Rental Deposit Rancho Cucamonga Hall & Kitchen No use $75.00 $180.00 $195.00 Rancho Cucamonga Hall 8 Kitchen No use $105.00 $225.00 $255.00 Event Hall $500.00 Alta Loma No use $25.00 $60.00 $65.00 Alta Loma No use $35.00 $75.00 $85.00 Large $250.00 Cucamonga No use $25.00 $60.00 $65.00 Cucamonga No use $35.00 $75.00 $85.00 large $250.00 Etiwanda No use $25.00 $60.00 $65.00 Etiwanda No use $35.00 $75.00 $85.00 Large $250.00 Creative Corner No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Creative Corner No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Medium $250.00 Dance Trail No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Dance Trail No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Chipmunk No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Chipmunk No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Fox No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Fox No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Raccoon No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Raccoon No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Grizzly Gulch / Bear Flat No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Grizzly Gulch /Bear Flat No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Large $250.00 Grizzly Gulch No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Grisly Gulch No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Smali $100.00 Bear Flat No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Bear Flat No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Big Hom No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Big Hom No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Teen Lodge No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Teen Lodge No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Large $250.00 Kitchen No use $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 Kitchen No use $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 Kitchen No Fee • Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group Group Group 3 Group Room Name Group 1 Group Group Group Room Rental 1 2 4 2 3 4 Size Deposit David Dreier David Dreier Event Hall East 8 West No use $50.00 $120.00 $130.00 Event Hall East 8 West No use $70.00 $150.00 $170.00 Event Hall $500.00 with Kitchen with Kitchen West Hall No use $25.00 $60.00 $65.00 West Hall No use $35.00 $75.00 $85.00 Large $250.00 East Hall No use $25.00 $60.00 $65.00 East Hall No use $35.00 $75.00 $85.00 Large $250.00 Cardio Peak No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Cardio Peak No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Crafters Den No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Crafters Den No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Timber Mountain No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Timber Mountain No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Clay Creek No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Clay Creek No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Medium $250.00 Game Point No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Game Point No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Medium $250.00 Mesa Courtyard No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Mesa Courtyard No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Event Space $500.00 Lookout Lounge No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Lookout Lounge No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Small $100.00 Large Kitchen No use $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 Large Kitchen No use $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 Kitchen No Fee P332 • ~ Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group 1 Group 2 Group Group Room Name Group Group 2 Group Group Room Rental 3 4 1 3 4 Size Deposit Courtyard approved No use No use No use Courtyard approved No use No use No use Space NIA Rains with Rains with Courtyard p v No use No use No use Courtyard p o No use No use No use N!A Rental ap ro ed Rental ap r ved Space Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group Group Group Group Room Name Group Group Group Group Deposit 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Small Room No use $10.00 $10.00 $25.00 Small Room No use $15.00 $15.00 $35.00 To be determined Arena No use $10 $10 $25 Arena No use $15 $15 $35 To be determined Daily Snacc Bar"' No use $5.00 $5.00 $10.00 Daily Snack Bar No use $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 To be determined Annual Shared No use $75.00 No fee No fee Annual Shared No use $75.00 No fee No fee To be determined Stora a Fee Stora a Fee Light Fee" Actuat COSTS Actual COSTS Actual COSTS Actual COStS Light Fee Actual COStS Actual COStS Actual COSTS Actual COSTS NIA " Includes use of P.A. System. Equestrian Center Lights are reimbursed at 100% of actual energy consumption. Tde sraal~Arenas t~have a coin metered box for electrical cost recovery for drop in use. "' Storage -For City Community Center and Public Fartilities. No storage will be provided to groups on an ongoing basis without the approval of the Community Services Director. • Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Room Name Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Room Size Rental Deposit Regina No fee $20.00 $50.00 $60.00 Regina No fee $30.00 $65.00 $75.00 Large $250.00 Thomas No fee $10.00 $30.00 $40.00 Thomas No fee $20.00 $45.00 $55.00 Small $100.00 Aggazzotti No fee $10.00 $30.00 $40.00 Aggazzotti No fee $20.00 $45.00 $55.00 Small $100.00 Galleano No fee $10.00 $30.00 $40.00 Galleano No fee $20.00 $45.00 $55.00 Small $100.00 • Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Room Name Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Room Size Rental Deposit Brookside with Kitchen No fee $25.00 $55.00 $65.00 Brookside ,Mth Kitchen No fee $35.00 $70.00 $80.00 Large $250.00 Filippi No fee $20.00 $50.00 $60.00 Filippi No fee $30.00 $65.00 $75.00 Large $250.00 Guasti No fee $10.00 $30.00 $40.00 Guasti No fee $20.00 $45.00 $55.00 Small $100.00 Opici No fee $10.00 $30.00 $40.00 Opici No fee $20.00 $45.00 $55.00 Small $100.00 Kit hen No fee $10.00 $15.00 $20.00 Kitchein No fee $10.00 $15.00 $20.00 No fee No fee fees}-Cer-ter Als-Fes ~` ~ ~ ~r Ne-Fee ~ $95 $a85 !_arge $2a6 P333 • Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group Group Group Group Room Name Group Group Group Group Room Rental 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Size Deposit Mission No use $20.00 $50.00 $60.00 Mission No use $30.00 $65.00 $75.00 Large $250.00 Zinfandel No use $20.00 $50.00 $60.00 Zinfandel No use $25.00 $65.00 $80.00 Large $250.00 Zinfandel North No use $10.00 $30.00 $40.00 Zinfandel North No use $20.00 $45.00 $55.00 Small $100.00 Zinfandel South No use $10.00 $30.00 $40.00 Zinfandel South No use $20.00 $45.00 $55.00 Small $100.00 No use No use Grenache $10.00 $30.00 $40.00 Grenache $20.00 $45.00 $55.00 Small $100.00 Muscat No use $10.00 $30.00 $40.00 Muscat No use $20.00 $45.00 $55.00 Small $100.00 No use Large Kitchen No fee No fee No fee Large Kitchen No use No fee No fee No fee No fee No fee • • Basketball Court Feeslcourt Group 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3 GROUP 4 Hourly Fee No use $30.00 $45.00 $60.00 Deposit No use $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 • ' ~ • • Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group Group Group Group Room Name Group Group Group Group Room Rental 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Size Deposit Eagle No fee $10.00 $30.00 $40.00 Eagle No fee $20.00 $45.00 $55.00 Small $100.00 Hawk No tee $10.00 $30.00 $40.00 Hawk No fee $20.00 $45.00 $55.00 Small $100.00 Champion No fee $20.00 $40.00 $50.00 Champion No fee $30.00 $50.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Viking No fee $20.00 $50.00 $60.00 Viking No fee $30.00 $50.00 $60.00 Small $250.00 Facility Equipment Use Fees (Community Facilities: NOTE: Not all items may be available at all facilities Item: Portable Stage (set or strike) Portable Public Address System Microphone Projector Projector with built in screen Portable Screen Piano Piano Tuning Large Power (over 30 amps) Cocktail Tables Outdoor Portable Heaters Linen Rentals Service Fees: Item: Deputy Sheriff Fee: $100.00 $50.00 $25.00 each $25.00 $50.00 $25.00 $50.00 $150.00 $1.00 per amp/day $12.00 each $50.00 each aFa~ietrEstablished per use; based on selection Fee: As charged by Sheriff's Department P334 •- ~ Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group Group Group Group Room Name Group l Group Group Group Room Rental ~ 2 3 4 2 3 4 Size Deposit Celebration Celebration Event Hall No use $65.00 $140.00 $160.00 Hall No use $85.00 $170.00 $185.00 Hall $500.00 A&B&C AS~B&C Celebration No use $40.00 $80.00 $85.00 Celebration No use $55.00 $95.00 $105.00 Large $500.00 Hall A Onl Hall A Onl Celebration No use $40.00 $80.00 $95.00 Celebration No use $55.00 $95.00 $105.00 Large $500.00 Hall B Onl Hall B Onl Celebration No use $40.00 $80.00 $95.00 Celebration No use $55.00 $95.00 $105.00 Large $500.00 Hall C Onl Hall C Onl 2/3 of 2/3 of Celebration No use $55.00 $110.00 $130.00 Celebration No use $70.00 $130.00 $150.00 Large $500.00 Hall Hall Studio Studio Theatre No use $40.00 $80.00 $95.00 Theatre No use $55.00 $95.00 $105.00 Large $500.00 (Rehearsal (Rehearsal Hall Hall Lewis Family Lewis Family Playhouse Playhouse (Theatre & (Theatre & $1,000 - Backstage) No use $80.00 $105.00 $105.00 Backstage) No use $105.00 $135.00 $135.00 Theatre $1,500 PREP DAYS PREP DAYS 4 Hour 4 Hour Minimum Minimum Lewis Family Lewis Family Playhouse Playhouse (Theatre & Backstage) No use $160.00 $210.00 $210.00 (Theatre ~ Backstage) No use $210.00 $265.00 $265.00 Theatre $1,000 - PERFORMAN PERFORMAN $1,500 DAYS DAYS 4 Hr Minimum 4 Hr Minimum Playhouse No use $55.00 $75.00 $105.00 Playhouse No use $75.00 $95.00 $130.00 Event $500 Lobby Lobby Space Courtyard No use $55.00 $75.00 $105.00 Courtyard No use $75.00 $95.00 $130.00 Event S ace $500 Playhouse: For extended periods of Playhouse rental, negotiated fees may be approved by the Community Services Director. Box Office Fees: Item: Fee: Handling Fee $1.75/ticket Rental Handling Fee $2.00/ticket Reprint Fee $2.00/ticket Exchange Fee $2.OOlticket Internet Fees $2.00 per order plus extra charges applied by tickets.com our web host applies. This fee is based on the prices of the ticket. Not to exceed $5.50 per ticket. Box Office Services $250 plus staff costs (City to sell tickets for organizations/renters) Ticket Printing Only $75 set up charge plus cost of ticket stock 10 P335 Indoor Facility Equipment Use Fees (Victoria Gardens Cultural Center): Item: Orchestra Pit Conversion Portable Stage (large) Portable Stage (small) Portable Public Address System Wireless Headset Microphone Specialized AV or Rigging Equipment Standard Facility AudioNisual Projector Linen Baby Grand Piano Upright Piano Large Power (over 30 amps) Cocktail Table Piano Tuning Upon Request Concessions Deposit Portable Screen Fee: $1,200 $150 $100 $100 $25 each per day; maximum $100 per week Established per use, based on type of equipment Included in rental $50 per day; maximum $100 per week Established per use, based on selection $150 $100 $1 per amp/day $12 each $200 $100 $25 Marquee Fees: Intermediate inclusion of one slide in the weekly schedule for a VGCC rental event (up to 3-weeks prior to event/ Playhouse performance date) Exclusive use of Marquee during Courtyard Rental event (during event hours only, up to 6 hrs maximum) Turn off Marquee during private Courtyard rental event (during event hours only, up to 2 hours maximum) Fee for each additional slide added to scheduled rotation $250/week* $250/hour $751hour $35/slide '` A one-time set up fee of $75 is included in the weekly use fee. Service Fees (Victoria Gardens Cultural Center): Item Deputy Sheriff Merchandise Sales by Vendors VGCC In-house catering Marketing Email Blast Marketing Freestanding Poster Marketing Direct Mailer Fee As charged by Sheriffs Department 10 - 30% as negotiated per event Based on order Fee to be determined based on quantity $50.00 per week $250.00 per list, plus postage Specialty Equipment Fee (Victoria Gardens Cultural Center): Equipment rented by City for customer use Cost of rental plus 20% 11 P336 Filming in Neighborhood and Community Parks: Filming for Commercial/Business purposes #+l~eiag in neighborhood and community parks is approved based upon availability of park space and ~s-assessed- requires a film+aQ permit. It may require a p Temporary Use Permit and any applicable fees or staff costs for City services. Film Permit application process and fees are subject to the Planning Department's criteria and fees currently assessed at $159 for the Film Permit plus a $110 inspection fee. e~$~4~1-~ Mobile Lift' Fees Lift Rental $300.00 Equipment is available for rent only for events conducted on City property and would require 2 part-time Staff Members to deliver, operate and return the equipment. Mobile Recreation Unit "Fun on the Run" Rental Three hours minimal rental $250.00 Each additional hour $50.00/hour Staffing charge: Minimum of 2 staff at $15.00 per hour for 30 or less participants. Additional staffing wi-I be required for parties over 30 at ratio of 1 staff member per 15 participants. Picnic Shelters Some City parks may be reserved for use. Hourly rental fees for picnic shelters located in these parks are as follows: Picnic Shelters Shelter Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Size Small No fee ~~ $8.D0 ~~ $13.00 ~~ $18.00 Large No fee ~`~ $12.00 ~~ $18.00 ~`~ $24.00 Red Hill Community Park Amphitheater The following are hourly rental fees for the Red Hill Park Amphitheater. The first hour of monitoring is included in the Amphitheatre rental for Groups 2 & 3. Amenity Group 1 Group 2-3 Group 4 Stage ~€Ja~Fee~ No use $25.00 575:°° $50."" Hourly Sound Monitoring No use $15.00 $15.°° Moon Bounce/Inflatable House and/or Specialized Entertainment Equipment Fee A $25.00 per bouncer/per piece of specialized entertainment equipment per day fee will be charged at the time the Park Reservation is submitted. 12 P337 Special Event Areas Included in this classification are the following sites. Hourly rental fees are noted in the table below. A damage deposit and police/private security fee may be assessed depending on the activity and/or number of participants. Red Hill Community Park -event area defined by amphitheatre, adjacent grass covered bowl area and picnic shelters. Event area does not include take, restrooms, playground or open park space immediately surrounding the lake. Heritage Community Park -event area defined as picnic shelters and grass bowl area adjacent to the east and south of the shelters. Perimeter defined by property edges to the east and south; sports field border to the west; park entry to the north. Event area does not include: playground, sports fields, Equestrian Center or equestrian trail. Central Park -Event area defined as large elliptical grass area northeast of the Senior/Community Center and immediately adjacent grass areas. Event are includes use of the Central Park Pavilion, if available. Event area does not include: playground. Central Park Bridge -Event area defined as the bridge southeast of the Senior/Community Center and immediately adjacent grass areas. Pacific Electric Trail (PET) Staging Area -Event area defined adjacent to the PET at Central Park immediately north of the Senior/Community Center. Site Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Red Hill Community Park" No use $75.00 $42~BA $100.00 $268:00 $150.00 Heritage Community Park No use $50.00 $75.00 $158:98 $100.00 Central Park" No use $75.00 $~88 $100.00 $269:99 $150.00 Central Park Bridge No use No Fee $50.00 $75.00 PET Staging Area No use $25.00 $50.00 $3588 $100.00 'includes use ofAmphitheatre. " Includes use of the Central Park Pavilion (When completed) Application Fee: A non-refundable $10.00 application fee will be applied to every Park Reservation Request. This fee is collected as part of the Park Reservation fee and will be applied to the rental upon its occurrence. In the event of a cancellation at any time, the application fee is withheld. 13 P338 Community and Neisthborhood Park Leagues and Tournaments Should there be a need for City staff to oversee and coordinate activities the fee is $15.00 per hour per staff member required. Applicant is also required to pay all event related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary. Community Softball Field ~ Soccer Fields (Per Field) Organized Leagues and Tvurnaments* Time Frame Group 1 8 2 Group 3 8 4 Deposit 2 Hours and Less No fee $75.00 $200.00 4 Hours and Less No fee $125.00 $200.00 All Day No fee $200.00 $200.00 Neis~hborhood and Community Park Lis~hted Sports Venue Fees: All Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Commission approved youth sports organizations which are recreation in nature and meet an overall residency rate of a minimum of 80% will have their light fee waived in full. Other sports organizations will pay their light fee in full (100%) for the electrical costs only. Snack Bar For City-Owned snack bars located in City Parks, fees will be assessed per season, FaIl/Winter or SpringlSummer as follows: Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 8~ 4 Seasonal No use $450.00 N/A Other non-profit groups bringing in snack bars (i.e. trailers, canopies, easy-ups) will be charged a flat $300.00 seasonal permit fee, unless group is participating in aCity-Sponsored event. A daily permit fee will be charged at a rate of $25.00 per day. Storage For City-Owned storage located in City Parks, fees will be assessed as follows: Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 8 4 Seasonal No use $75.00 N/A Outdoor Park Facility Permit for Businesses: Private and for-profit businesses may apply for a permit to use park or field space for business use at allocated park sites, pursuant to Community Services Department policy and procedures. All businesses must comply with Rancho Cucamonga Business Licensing regulations. Pursuant to Ordinance 12.04.10 no businesses shall operate at a park site without a permit issued by the Community Services Department. t >:•at,', ,' ?* ~' Grou 1, 2 8~ 3 Grou 4 Daily Fee NIA $50 Monthly Fee N/A $200 14 P339 Epicenter Community Sport Fields Rental Fees and Deposits Tournament and League Fees for Adult Softball***, Adult Soccer & Baseball Fields and Special Events at the Epicenter" Weekday 8 Weekend Rate Per Field City Holiday Rate Per Field Group 1 8 2 Group 3 8~ 4 Group 1 8 2 Group 3 8~ 4 Field Rental - 2 Hours & " $50 00 $150.00 $75.00 $225.00 Less Field Rental - 4 Hours 8~ * $100.00 $250.00 $150.00 $375.00 Less $350.00 Field Rental -All Day* $200.00 $300.00 $525.00 Deposit $250.00 $400.00 $250.00 $400.00 Infield Lining Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Light Fee Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Includes initial field dragging and watering. The deposit will be applied to the total rental fee. *** Adult softball fields =all 3 softball fields must be rented when renting softball fields ~~ When additional City staffing, equipment and material are required for tournaments and/or special event programs scheduled at the Epicenter Sports fields, the applicant is required to pay all event-related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary. ~ • Stadium Events Ticketed Events * Non-Ticketed Events $2,500.00/day Stadium Rental $3,000.00/day Plus 10% of gross ticket sales Sky Box Rental/Box $50.00/hour $50.00/hour Cafe Area $50.00/hour $50.00/hour Pavilion (3"' base) $75.00/hour $75.00/hour Plaza(1~ base) $85.00/hour $85.00/hour Parking Lot Events Ticketed Events Non-Ticketed Events Stadium On-Site $600.00/day $750.00/day Parking Lots A, B, or C Plus 10% of gross ticket sales Stadium On-Site $400.00/day $500.00/day Parking Lots D, E, or F Plus 10% of gross ticket sales Special Event Park Lot $600.00/day $750.00/day Parking Lot G-2 (only) Plus 10% of gross ticket sales Special Event Park Lot $1,500.00/day $2,000.00/day Including Parking Lots G-2 and G-3 Plus 10% of gross Gdcet sales ~ ~ -• Site Groups 1-4 Epicenter Grass Event Area" $100.00/hour * Special event area defined as grass area between parking lots A and B. Damage Deposit: $250.00 -- depending on the activity and/or number of participants. 15 P340 General Still Photography Minimum of $250.00 to $500.00 per day, depending on photography (Not far CommerciaUFor profit purposes) requirements, plus actual costs for City services. CommerciaUFor Profit Filming Minimum of $~~99-$5:A99 $3,000-$6,000 per day, depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services. CommerciaUFor Profit Filming in a Parking Lot Minimum of $1,000-$3,000 per day, depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services. Commercial/For Profit SGII Photography Minimum of $a-;AAA-$39AA $500-$2,000 per day, depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services. Film Permit Film Permit application process and fees are subject to the Planning Department's criteria and current fees. Location Credit Required City of Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium Lighting Fee Actual Costs Technical Scout Meeting(s) $250.00 per meeting Planning meeting(s) with technical crew, prior to final contract City Staffinst for Epicenter Rentals: City staff will be charged at the rate of $15.00/hour for each staff member. A minimum of one staff member will be assigned to each rental. ~ ~ ~ -• Parking Lot Fees Baseball Events Option to charge: $2.00 per car; $15.00 per bus Concerts and Special Events Option to charge: $3.00 - $5.00 per car; $5.00 - $10.00 per VIP car; and $15.00 per bus. Fifty percent (50 /o) returns to the City. Parking Lot Events Option to charge: $2.00 - $5.00 per car. Fifty percent (50%) returns to the City. Concessions 20% of gross sales from for-profit organizations Food and Beverage 10% of gross sales from non-profit organizations Merchandise and Novelties 20% of gross sales from for-profit organizations (Books, Tapes, CD's, DVD's, Programs, T-shirts, etc.) y; • ti " : 10% of gross sales from non-profit organizations ; ~ ~ ~.;, : ~~• i .; Miscellaneous Feea 8 Charges Additional Move-in /Move-out Days 50% of daily event rental rate Canopy/Tent Maintenance Reserve Fee Minimum of $300.00 to $1,000.00 per event depending on eventlrental requirements City Business License Required Minimum of $500.00 to $2,500.00 per day, depending upon Deposit event/rental requirements. At the discretion of the Community Services Director, an additional Deposit may be required depending upon event/rental requirements and the City's liability exposure Applicant is required to pay all event related expenses inGuding personnel, equipment and materials and other related costs. In some Event Expenses instances events at the Epicenter may incur additional fees that are assessed separately from the Police Department, the Building and Safety Division and the Fire District for security services, inspections and/or permits. Based upon the event proposed, the fees shown may be subject to negotiation. '` Based on Provisions of the Municipal Ordinance. ** Exception to Parking Rates applies to vehicles entitled to occupy the preferred parking area (Lot A) delineated in the lease with Rancho Baseball, LLC I: I COMMSERV 1 ADMINlSTRATIONIFees120121 PRC. Draft. 5.17.12. doc 16 P341 STAFF REPORT ADMINIS'I'Rr1TIVE SERVKES Date: July 18, 2012 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/A I inistrative Services By: Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buye Subject: APPROVAL TO RENEW CO RACT #09-057 BETWEEN NEC COPROPORATION OF AMERICA AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13, IN THE AMOUNT OF $84,992, AND A CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $9158, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCCOUNT NO. 1001205-5300 (CONTRACT SERVICES). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the renewal of Contract #09-057 between NEC Corporation of America and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Telephone System Maintenance and Support Services for Fiscal Year 2012/2013, in the amount of $84,992 and a contingency in the amount of $9158, to be funded from Account No. 1001205-5300 (Contract Services). BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS In 1999, the City installed a complete Private Branch Exchange (PBX) telecommunications network for City Hall and all offsite locations manufactured by NEC Corporation of America (hereinafter "NEC"). NEC is also currently under contract to provide citywide telephone maintenance and support services on the City's equipment. As per the terms of Contract Number 09-057 between the City and NEC, Fiscal Year 2011/2012 was the last year of renewal. In order to avoid an interruption in maintenance, Staff has determined that renewing the current contract for one (1) additional year to be in the City's best interest. NEC has proven to provide outstanding technical knowledge, support service, and responsiveness resulting in minimal system down-time. Therefore, the City invited NEC to submit a proposal for continued system maintenance for Fiscal Year 2012/2013. NEC has submitted an offer based on General Services Administration Contract Number GS-35F-0245J. Staff reviewed the offer and determined there was an opportunity for further negotiation. Staff continued to work with NEC representatives on a more cost effective proposal. The final offer received resulted in a cost avoidance in the amount of $16,777 below the initial offer without any reductions in service. The final contract amount offered is within the approved budget and is 5.5% lower then Fiscal Year 2011/2012. All documentation is on file in Purchasing. Fiscal Year 2012/2013 will be the final year to contract with NEC. The City will be going out to bid for annual citywide telephone system maintenance and technical support for Fiscal Year 2013/2014. NEC shall be invited to participate in the solicitation process. See Item N1., page P342 NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at the CRA/City Council meeting of June 20, 2012, the City Council continued the following public hearing to July 18, 2012 at 7:00 p.m.: R1. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00571 AND ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — A comprehensive update to the Development Code including a request to replace Title 17 (Development Code), modify Chapter 2.24 (Historic Preservation), modify Chapter 1.12 (Penalties, Administrative and Civil Remedies and General Provisions), delete Chapter 5.12 (Regulation of Entertainment), delete Title 14 (Signs), delete Chapter 19.08 (Tree Preservation) and other clarifying amendments of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code as well as a proposed addendum to the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR). DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE 2012 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of a proposal to establish new development fees for Planning services as a result of the creation of new application types in the comprehensive update to the Development Code (DRC2010-00571). ORDINANCE NO. 855 (FIRST READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00571, A COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF RESOLUTION NO. 12-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FEES FOR SERVICES RELATED TO APPLICATIONS FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW AND FOR THE MODIFICATION OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS Said meeting will be held in Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730. Date: une 21, 2012 A, De•ra McNay 6 As .istant City Cler Records Manager P342 STAFF REPORT - PUNNING tJEP~1RTbfENT Date: July 18, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Interim Planning Director By: Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner Subject: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00571 AND ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A comprehensive update to the Development Code including a request to replace Title 17 (Development Code), modify Chapter 2.24 (Historic Preservation), modify Chapter 1.12 (Penalties, Administrative and Civil Remedies and General Provisions), delete Chapter 5.12 (Regulation of Entertainment), delete Title 14 (Signs), delete Chapter 19.08 (Tree Preservation) and other clarifying amendments of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code as well. as a proposed addendum to the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR). This item was continued from the June 20, 2012, City Council Meeting. DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE 2012 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of a proposal to establish new development fees for Planning services as a result of the creation of new application types in the comprehensive update to the Development Code (DRC2010-00571). This item was continued from the June 20, 2012, City Council Meeting. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and staff recommend the City Council take the following actions: Adopt an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report for the Development Code Update. 2. Approve Municipal Code Amendment DRC2010-00571 for the Development Code Update and related Municipal Code amendments. 3. Adopt the proposed new development fees for planning services. BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its first Development Code in 1983. Since adoption, numerous text amendments have been adopted in response to changing development patterns however; the core elements of the 1983 document have remained intact. When the Development Code was first adopted, the City was predominantly vacant with most development applications consisting of large tracts of land with hundreds of residential units or large distribution warehouse complexes. Today, the City is largely being developed with the majority of land use applications proposing smaller residential subdivisions or more modest commercial and industrial development or redevelopment of underperforming properties. In May 2010, the City Council adopted the 2010 General Plan to serve as a long-range policy document that guides the development of the City. The General Plan guides the vision of the P343 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2010-00571 AND DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 18, 2012 Page 2 future and reinforces established land uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga while targeting new residential, office and commercial growth on vacant and underutilized properties. The 2010 General Plan includes a comprehensive Implementation Plan. The Implementation Plan establishes actions the City will pursue to implement the goals of the General Plan Update over the course of its 15 to 20 year projected planning horizon. The implementation measures listed within the General Plan include reviewing and modifying the Development Code to put the goals and policies of the General Plan into action. In January 2011, the Council included in its annual goals an update of the Development Code in 2012 and directed staff to begin this process with the assistance of outside professionals with broad Development Code writing experience. In April 2011, the Council entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Pacific Municipal Consultants (PMC) to facilitate a comprehensive Development Code Update. On June 20, 2012, the project was continued to the July 18, 2012, City Council meeting. DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE PROCESS: The Development Code update process has taken approximately 13 months from initiation to completion and is divided into four phases: Phase 1: Issue Identification and Direction (May -July 2011) • Data Review and Analysis -Staff presented PMC with copies of the current Development Code, Specific Plans and Master Plans, policy documents, code interpretations, Use Determinations and recent adopted ordinances for review. PMC conducted a technical review and provided written analysis of code issues and alternatives. • Work Sessions with City Staff -PMC met with staff to discuss the code issues and preferred alternatives and developed a key recommendations report and annotated outline of the new Development Code. • Stakeholder Meetings -PMC conducted stakeholder interviews with a variety of internal and external groups including commercial and residential developers, real estate brokers and property managers, engineers and architects, sign companies, historic preservation groups, police and fire departments, Healthy RC representatives, community development departments, City Council members and Planning Commissioners. • Public Workshop #1 (July 12, 2011) -Staff and PMC hosted a public workshop held in July 2011 where a community scorecard was used to poll opinions on key issues and opportunities. Phase 2: Draft Code Update and Environmental Review (August 2011 -March 2012) Administrative Draft Development Code -PMC produced two administrative drafts of the Development Code, the first in September 2011, the second in January 2012. Staff extensively reviewed each draft and provided detailed comments and feedback to PMC. Public Draft Development Code -PMC completed the public draft of the Development Code that incorporated all of staff's edits. This draft was released to the public on April 5, 2012. P344 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2010-00571 AND DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 18, 2012 Page 3 • Zoning Map Changes -PMC, utilizing base GIS data from the City, produced a new zoning map to coincide with the new Development Code. The map is a graphical representation of the zoning in the Development Code. It was updated based on feedback from staff to represent base zoning, special planning areas and to update previously approved zoning changes that had not been displayed on the existing zoning map. Phase 3: Public Review (April and May 2012) Meetings with BIA, Chamber of Commerce -Upon release of the public draft, staff met directly with the BIA and Chamber of Commerce to present an overview of the changes in the new Code and solicit feedback. • Public Workshop #2 (April 19, 2012) -Staff and PMC hosted a pubic workshop to present the changes in the new Code and answer questions. • Joint Workshop (May 2, 2012) -Staff and PMC presented a summary of the new Code to a joint workshop of the City Council and Planning Commission, answered questions and received additional direction. Phase 4: Public Hearings and Adoption (May and June 2012) • Public Hearings - Staff and PMC will present the Development Code for review, recommendation and approval at public hearings with the Planning Commission and City Council. • Final Development Code and Zoning Map -Upon approval from the City Council, staff and PMC will compile the final copy of the Development Code and Zoning Map for printing and distribution prior to its effective date of August 20, 2012. OBJECTIVES OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE: As a result of the stakeholder meetings and the public workshop process conducted in Phase 1, several clear objectives for the Development Code Update were established: • Implement the policies of the General Plan. • Adopt an official zoning map consistent with the General Plan. • Ensure the Code is consistent with State and Federal laws. • Eliminate ambiguous language within the Code. • Provide a Development Code with an understandable structure and language for the typical citizen. • Add more graphics to clarify intent. • Streamline approval procedures while maintaining opportunities for public participation. • Update the Sign Code. • Address the compatibility of land use conversions and reuse of existing buildings. P345 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2010-00571 AND DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 18, 2012 Page 4 Promote sustainable development. Simplify design standards without compromising the quality of development. KEY CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE: It was determined during the data review and analysis process that some existing development standards (ex. setbacks) work well within the community and do not need to be changed. Staff and PMC identified many areas where the Code lacked clarity and those areas were addressed. Table 1 illustrates general areas in the Code that were changed, and those that did not. Table 1 -Comparison of Regulations MAJOR CHANGES INCLUDE: ITEMS THAT DID NOT CHANGE: Document organization General development standards Tables and graphics Historic preservation Permit procedures Hillside development standards Land use classification system Home occupations Mobile hot food trucks Medical marijuana dispensaries Some site development provisions Non-conforming uses and structures (e.g., parking and sign regulations) performance standards Some specific use requirements (e.g., special Water efficient landscaping regulated uses, temporary uses) Green building incentives Wireless communication facilities Special planning areas As this project encompassed a complete reorganization and rewriting of the Development Code, a "line by line" comparison between the current code and the new Code is impractical. As an alternative, staff prepared a matrix of the significant changes in the new Development Code and how those changes relate to elements of the current Code (Exhibit A). In some cases, the new code provides an update to existing elements, but in most cases, the new Code adds many changes that are not present in the current Code. One area of the Code that received a significant facelift is the allowed use table. This table establishes the uses allowed within the City and the corresponding requirements for permits and entitlements for each of the City's base zoning districts. Generally, a use is either allowed by right, through the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit, or is not permitted. In the existing Code, there are four separate land use tables. The new Code consolidates allowed land use regulations for the City's base zoning districts into a single allowed use table. The goal was to "translate' existing use regulations wherever possible, but we also included new uses that did not previously exist. Exhibit B shows alt of the current land uses and the new land use translation and Exhibit C shows all of the new land uses introduced in the new Code. P346 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2010-00571 AND DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 18, 2012 Page 5 Staff is proposing a few changes to the zones in which some of these uses are regulated. • Assembly Use is no longer allowed in Commercial zones. As the State has continued to grapple with its budget deficits by raiding local funds, it is imperative that we maintain our commercial corridors to generate sales tax revenue that is an important component of our local budget. • Massage establishments are now permitted by right in all Commercial and Industrial Park and General Industrial zones consistent with State law. • Medical Use, Extended Care is no longer allowed within the Haven Overlay. PUBLIC OUTREACH AND COMMENTS: Since the release of the public draft, staff has performed additional outreach activities to create public awareness and solicit public feedback on the document. These include: • Meeting with the BIA to discuss changes that impact homebuilders. • Meeting with the Chamber of Commerce to discuss changes that impact the business community. • Fielding questions on the Development Code via phone, a-mail and visits to the public counter. • Hosting a workshop on April 19, 2012 and receiving public input. As a result of this outreach we have received oral and written responses and requests for clarification from the development community and the BIA (Exhibits D, E, F and G). Staff has worked directly with several respondents to clarify questions presented; however, three issues required additional consideration. A summary of these key issues and staff's recommendation for each are listed below. Issue #1 -Parking standards for warehouse uses Staff proposed to increase the required parking for warehouse uses. Many recently constructed warehouse buildings in the City have been built on speculation, without an identified warehouse user. Once these buildings are constructed, finding a warehouse use can be difficult. However, there are other allowed uses within that base zoning district that could lease or purchase the space. Sometimes those uses require more parking than is provided for on the site, leading staff to have to potentially deny those uses of the property. Staff believes that by increasing the required parking, there- is the possibility to capture additional uses that could utilize that same building and still have adequate parking. The feedback received from the public indicated that this would be too onerous of a requirement for future development. Further staff analysis determined that with the few acres left available for industrial development, there would not be enough additional benefit to justify making parking for many existing industrial sites potentially non- conforming. Staff recommends that the current parking ratio for warehouse uses remains in place. Issue #2 -Uses within the Specialty Commercial Base Zoning District The owners of the Thomas Winery Plaza submitted comments regarding the lack of depth in the commercial uses allowed within the Specialty Commercial district, of which their property lies (Exhibit D). Upon staff review, we determined that some of the uses that were not allowed were P347 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2010-00571 AND DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 18, 2012 Page 6 due to an error in the translation of the existing land use table to the new land use table and would be easily corrected. In addition, they requested staff to consider expanding the allowed uses within the Specialty Commercial District in order to allow for additional leasing opportunities. Staff reviewed their request and agrees that the current zoning is too restrictive. Staff has included in the next section, a list of the additional uses that will be allowed within the Specialty Commercial base zoning district. Issue #3 -Parking Standards for Four Bedroom Multi-Family Units Staff proposed increasing the required parking for four bedroom multi-family units from the current standard of 2.3 parking spaces per unit, to 3 parking spaces per unit. We received feedback that this standard may be too high. Staff conducted additional research and determined that many cities use a lower ratio for four bedroom units, usually 2.5 spaces per unit. Lewis Communities provided data that indicates that the current average number of adults renting a four bedroom unit is 2.0. Given this data, staff proposes reducing the number of required spaces in the new Code from 3.0 spaces per unit to 2.5 spaces per unit. CHANGES PROPOSED SINCE THE RELEASE OF THE PUBLIC DRAFT DEVELOPMENT CODE: The release of the public draft Development Code in April 2011 allowed staff and the public one additional opportunity to review the document and make any final needed changes. Staff recommends the following changes to the Public Draft Development Code to incorporate unintended omissions, clarify regulations, address issues raised since the release of the public draft, and respond to informal public comments. Attachment 2 of Resolution 12-22 identifies the actual text change to the Public Draft Development Code. The next section summarizes these changes. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES: Article II Land Use and Development Procedures Residential Additions. Amend Sectiori 17.16.130 B to specify that residential additions greater than 50 percent of the existing square footage are subject to a Minor Development Review. 2. Entertainment Permits. Amend Section 17.20.020 C 5 to allow for up to four acoustic performers at any established business as exempt from an entertainment permit. 3. Reasonable Accommodations. Amend Section 17.20.060 to change decision making authority from the Planning Commission to the Planning Director. As such, the entire Section 17.20.060 will be relocated to the Planning Director Decision Chapter (Chapter 17.16, new Section 17.16.150). Clarify that other discretionary permits may be required for the accommodation (with the exception of a Variance), which the reasonable accommodation is designed to alleviate. Add language providing the opportunity to impose conditions on the approval, similar to other decisions. P348 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2010-00571 AND DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 18, 2012 Page 7 4. Master Plan. Add a new purpose statement regarding Master Plans to Section 17.22.020 A to clarify the intent of this planning tool. 5. Mills Act Applications. Amend Table 17.14.060-1 to change the decision making authority for Mills Act applications with the Planning Director and Historic Preservation Commission as recommending bodies, and the City Council as the final approving authority. 6. Home Occupation Permit. Amend the findings for Home Occupation Permits in Section 17.16.040 to remove the reference to peace, morals, and comfort. Additionally, add a finding that requires compliance with the Home Occupation development standards in Section 17.98.030. Article III Zoning Districts Allowed Uses and Development Standards 7. Commercial Office Zoning District. Amend Chapter 17.24 to include the existing Commercial Office Zoning District (from Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan) to a new Citywide Base Zoning District. 8. Allowed Use Modifications. Amend allowed use regulations in Table 17.30.030-1 as follows: • Add the requirement to use Optional Standards for Multi-family development in the LM Residential District and single-family in the M Residential District. • Amend Tattoo Shops as allowed in the GC District, not in the CC or RRC Districts. • Amend Medical Services, Extended Care as a permitted use in the OP, GC, CC, IP and GI Districts. • Amend Assembly Uses as not permitted in the MU District. • Amend "Drive-In and Drive-Through Sales and Service' as a permitted use in the CC District. • Add "Agricultural Uses" as a new land use category permitted by right in the OS, FC and UC Districts. • Add "Convention Center" as a new land use category conditionally permitted in all industrial, commercial and office Districts. • Add "Feed and Tack Store" as a new land use category permitted by right in the NC and GC Districts. • Add "Mobile Hot Food Trucks" as a new land use category that is not permitted in all base zoning districts except as part of a special event with a Temporary Use Permit. • Add "Specialty Food Store" as a new land use category permitted by right in the MU, NC, GC, CC, RRC and SC Districts. P349 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2010-00571 AND DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 18, 2012 Page 8 Amend Specialty Commercial uses for: Convenience Store (CUP), Business Support Services (P), Furniture, Furnishing and Appliance Store (P), Bed and Breakfast (CUP), Tutoring Center -Large (CUP), Tutoring Center -Small (P), Liquor Store (CUP), Consignment Store (CUP), Veterinary Facility (CUP), Office, Business and Professional (P), Internet Cafe (P), Massage (P), Office, Accessory (P), Specialty Food Store (P) 9. Allowed Use Descriptions. Amend allowed use descriptions in Section 17.32.020 as follows: • For Home Improvement Supply Store, remove the word "furnishings' from the description. • For General Retail, include both single and multiple lines of merchandise and remove furniture, home furnishings and equipment from the description, as they have their own land use classification. • For Restaurant, remove the word "sit down" from the description. • Add new classification listings and corresponding descriptions for "Agricultural Uses", "Consignment Stores", "Convention Center', "Feed and Tack Stores", "Mobile Hot Food Trucks", and "Specialty Food Store." • For Personal Services, add "weight loss clinics" to the description and clarify that permanent makeup is permitted, but tattoo is separately classified. Additionally, include "day spa" in the description with appropriate reference to requirements for massage. Finally, add- spiritualist reading or astrology forecasting to the description. 10. General Development Standards. Add a new Figure for Section 17.34.040 B showing how the front yard is measured on a flag lot. Additionally, amehd Section 17.34.040 E for encroachments to remove the word "replacement" since the new standard will apply to all chimneys, not just replacements. 11. Residential Development Standards. Amend Section 17.36.010 and Table 17.36.010-1 as follows: • Add existing standards for setbacks at interior site boundaries, open space requirements, and setbacks between building fronts. • Update and incorporate existing optional development standards for maximum residential development and rename as "Standards for Higher Residential Densities. ' • Amend Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to reflect a maximum of 150 percent of lot coverage, which is not applicable in MH and H zones. This will alleviate large "box on box" 2-story, single-family custom home development. • Add existing recreation amenities requirements and options. • Add existing streetscape setbacks for single-family. P350 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2010-00571 AND DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 18, 2012 Page 9 12. Commercial Development Standards. Amend Section 17.36.030 to include existing streetscape setbacks for commercial development. 13. Industrial Development Standards. Amend Section 17.36.040 to include existing outdoor eating requirements. 14. Equestrian Overlav Zoning District. Amend the descriptive boundary in Section 17.38.020 to match the equestrian overlay in the General Plan (Banyan Street from the west City boundary to Milliken Avenue, South to CA 210 freeway to I-15 freeway to the east and along the entire northern boundary of the Sphere of Influence). 15. Haven Overlay Zoning District. Amend Allowed Use Table 17.38.040-1 to include Hotel and Motel and Medical Services, General as a permitted use in the Haven Overlay Zoning District. 16. 4th Street Overlay Zoning District. Amend Section 17.38.050 to expand and rename the 4th Street Overlay Zoning District to include the other areas of the City designated as IP District, but are allowed to have GC uses as well (east side of Haven Avenue between Arrow Route and Civic Center Drive, southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue and the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Elm Avenue and Spruce Avenue). Additionally, amend allowed uses in Table 17.38.050-1 for Assembly use from C to N. Article IV Site Development Provisions 17. Accessory Structures. Amend Figure 17.42.040-1 as follows: Remove specific numerical standards for interior setbacks and simply reference interior side yard setbacks as this number may vary from zone to zone. • Add a new graphic to show the side yard setback criteria for solid roof and open roof structures within the rear yard. Amend Table 17.42.040-1 as follows: Add a new footnote for setback criteria for solid roof and open roof structure to state that the side yard setback criteria applies in the rear yard only. • Allow accessory structures with a solid roof less than 6 feet tall and 120 square feet in area to be placed on the street side yard. • Remove the requirements fora 6-foot separation between the primary and accessory structure and reference compliance with building code requirements as applicable. P351 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2010-00571 AND DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 18, 2012 Page 10 18. Fences, Walls, and Screening. Amend Figure 17.48.030-2 to read "Measure height from mid-point of retaining wall height at lower grade." 19. Green Building. Amend Section 17.50.020 to clarify that the mandatory tier 1 provisions for municipal buildings is only if the building is greater than 7,500 square feet. Additionally, amend Section 17.50.030 to clarify that the tier 2 incentives include a choice of priority processing and relaxation of one development standard or design requirement. 20. Landscape Standards. Amend Chapter 17.58 as follows: • Clarify Section 17.58.070 A to state that the standards in the table apply only to new development. • Amend Section 17.58.060 M 3 so that the interior landscape planter dimension is 5 feet and update the figure accordingly. • Add language to Section 17.58.080 C with an exception that new windrows are not required in the wildland-urban interface area. • Update Section 17.58.040 1 to explain that the Fire Chief is an additional approving authority for projects in the wildland-urban interface area. • Amend Section 17.58.050 B and C to reference planting requirements in the wildland-urban interface fire area that emphasize wildfire hazard reduction. • Add reference to the wildland-urban interface fire area under the special landscape requirements in Section 17.58.060. 21. Outdoor Sales, Storage. Display, and Seating. Amend Section 17.62.030 B 1 to remove the example that is currently listed "(e.g., seasonal sales as a temporary use requiring a TUP)." 22. Parking and Loading. Remove Sections 17.68.020 B and C regarding change of use or occupancy related to parking requirements. Additionally, update Section 17.68.060 C to correct the decision making authority for Conditional Use Permits from the Planning Commission to the Planning Director. Finally, amend the parking standards in Table 17.68.050-1 to revert back to the existing parking standards for industrial warehousing and, reduce the required parking for four or more bedroom multi-family units to 2.5 spaces. 23. Sidewalks and Trails. Amend Section 17.74.030 G 1 to remove the 6-foot width requirement and simply reference compliance with ADA standards. 24. Sign Regulations for Private Property. Amend Chapter 17.78 to add sign standards for large retail establishments over 100,000 square feet to allow for greater signage based on the relative scale of the buildings. Additionally, update the chapter to allow for signs for special events in conjunction with an approved Temporary Use Permit (1 per parcel maximum with 25 square feet max size and property owner approval required). P352 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2010-00571 AND DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 18, 2012 Page 11 25. Tree Preservation. Amend Section 17.84.040 A to allow for Eucalyptus nicholii as an alternative replacement to Eucalyptus maculate and give the Planning Director the ability to choose another Eucalyptus species. Additionally, amend Section 17.84.050 C to reference the City's fire hazard abatement provisions. 26. Uses in Historic Structures. Add a new Chapter 17.54 (Historic Structures) to incorporate existing language regarding uses in historic structures and reference to other related provisions for historic preservation. 27. Electric Charging Stations. Amend Chapter 17.68 (Parking and Loading) to include a new Section 17.68.110 with electric vehicle parking requirements. Article V Specific Use Requirements 28. Drive-In and Drive-Through Uses. Add a graphic that shows an example drive-through site plan consistent with the requirements of this section. 29. Home Occupations. Amerid Section 17.98.020 to clarify that home occupations are permitted in non-conforming residences. For example, asingle-family home that is legal non-conforming on a parcel zoned Industrial may be allowed to have a Home Occupation Permit. 30. Public Utilities and Uses. Amend Section 17.104.040 D for sewage and water treatment plants to reference compliance with vegetation management requirements for property located in wildland-urban interface fire areas. 31. Temporary Uses. Amend Section 17.110.040 B by relocating items 1, 2 and 4 to 17.110.020 A and deleting the remainder of the section. Additionally, amend Section 17.110.040 C and D to clarify the intent of clearance requirements for emergency vehicle and fire access lanes. 32. Wireless Communication Facilities. Amend Section 17.112.020 to clarify that the removal of wireless communication facilities is exempt from permits and that the replacement of equipment which does not substantially change the tower or shelter is -exempt from planning permits, but may be subject to building permits. 33. Temporary Model Homes. Amend Section 17.110.040 to change the required tree planting size requirement from 48-inch box to 36-inch box tree. Article VI Special Planning Areas 34. Master Plan Purpose. Amend Section 17.116.010 to remove the statement that most Master Plans are mixed use sites. P353 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2010-00571 AND DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 18, 2012 Page 12 35. Master Plan Descriptions. Amend Section 17.118.040 to clarify that the list of master plans is not inclusive, because we have several other "master plans' that are really approved site plans under the previous "master planning" approval. Article VII Design Standards and Guidelines 36. Residential Design Standards. Amend Table 17.132.010-1 to include descriptions of the two superscripts for floor plans and elevations. Article Vlll Glossary 37. Universal Definitions. Amend definitions in Chapter 17.136 as follows: • Add a definition for Mobile Hot Food Truck Events, which is for the "food truck festivals" where someone organizes a group of mobile (often gourmet) food trucks to a temporary event. • Add a definition for Floor Area Ratio. • Add a definition for Planning Entitlement. • Clarify definition for Yard, Front to reiterate that front yard is measured from face of curb. 38. Sign Definitions. Amend definitions in Chapter 17.146 to define a "pedestrian traffic sign". In addition to the changes proposed above, staff and PMC will conduct a final editing of the Development Code and Zoning Map to ensure any spelling, grammatical and formatting errors are corrected. All of these changes will be incorporated into the final published version of the Development Code and Zoning Map and will be ready for distribution prior to the effective date of the Code. FEES: The process for modifications to an existing permit has been formalized; however there is not an alternative fee structure for these permits. For example; if a business had an approved Conditional Use Permit on file and needed to modify the Permit to adjust their hours of operation, they would need to apply and pay the rate of a new Conditional use Permit. The Planning Department has been working with Maximus, Inc. over the last year to review the current fee schedule and determine if changes should be made. As part of this process, staff has been reviewing all application types and determining the average number of hours needed to process each. During this research, it was determined that for projects where an entitlement or permit was already issued and modifications were required, the staff time needed to process the modification is roughly 50 percent less than the time needed to process the original application. The City still charges the full rate as if it were an original application. Using this methodology, staff P354 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2010-00571 AND DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 18, 2012 Page 13 is proposing to create a series of new fees for the modification of an existing permit or entitlement that would be one half ('/~) the cost of the original permit. Approving these fees with the Development Code Update would allow the business and development community an immediate opportunity to begin taking advantage of these lower fees for modifications to projects as needed. Exhibit H illustrates the existing application fees with their proposed "modification" fees which will be added to the existing fee schedule. In addition, a new application type is proposed in the Development Code Update called a Site Development Review (SDR). The purpose of the SDR is to take smaller projects that are currently captured in the Minor Development Review process, but do not have the same level of complexity or review. Since we were unable to adequately determine the exact number of hours needed to complete the application, it is proposed that a base rate of $98.20 per hour be billed on a deposit- based schedule until such time that we have adequately determined the average number of hours necessary to complete an SDR application. The billing approach will eventually be replaced by a fixed fee. DEVELOPMENT CODE MAINTENANCE: The Development Code should not become a static document. Just as the community and the economy change and grow, the Development Code should also be reviewed and refined not just to keep up with change and growth, but to anticipate it. Planning staff is working on developing a regular work plan that will include annual reviews of the Development Code and recommend changes. Staff will be developing a list of items that may be evaluated in the next Development Code review. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, PMC has prepared an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027). The Development Code Update does not propose any substantial changes in the City's development regulations that were not analyzed in the General Plan EIR or that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects, or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. As a consequence, an addendum is the appropriate level of environmental review. The addendum is provided and shown as Attachment 5 of the Ordinance. NOTICE: This is a recommendation to adopt a comprehensive update to the Development Code and related development fees affecting all parcels within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65090, this item was advertised 18 days in advance as a public hearing (1/8 page ad) in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. No individual notice to property owners was provided. P355 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2010-00571 AND DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 18, 2012 Page 14 Respectfully submitted, Jeffre loom Interim Planning Director JAB:JN/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Key Changes Matrix Exhibit B - Land Use Table Translation Exhibit C - Table of New Land Uses Exhibit D - Letter from the Thomas Winery Plaza Property Owner, LLC dated April 18, 2012 Exhibit E - Letter from the Building Industry Association dated May 1, 2012, with response from the City dated May 10, 2012 Exhibit F - Letter from Dedeaux Properties dated May 2, 2012 Exhibit G - Comments from Charlie Buquet received via a-mail on April 26, 2012 Exhibit H - Proposed Fees Exhibit I - Planning Commission Minutes dated May 23, 2012 Exhibit J - Signed Planning Commission Resolution #12-23Recommending Approval of Municipal Code Amendment DRC2010-00571 Draft Ordinance of Approval for Municipal Code Amendment DRC2010-00571 Draft City Council Resolution adopting new development fees for planning services. w la N d I R t U Y d V 3 d C d t C_ H d C R t U d Y d 0 U 01 C N ~X d d L C ~: .~ t a ~ rn ~ ~ a m ~ o d v, p 0 d c ~ d N y ~ a . j c O ~ a - d ~ . . C ~ ~ Ld d a0 -- m jS N ~ d V~ ~9 0 0 ° -. d E o ~' E n~ d N d a i N L E ,~ o N :? d U d d~ o d N 7 y O O N C~ N ~ ~ n N C K . p C N ~ C a O N ~ O V ' C a C ` C d O . o~ d~ d ~ N ~ d a ~ ~ d 'o ~L 0 '~ . N T- > N N "' V a > d u . c ~' c O d L O Q a U~ d U a ~ C p O) jp B y N O 3 o L d m 3 d o C :~ U C d m Q d a E dd L d d d d N ~ C d y U ~X d d 0 ~ V ' ~ Z c a d ~ .~ m e o d n ~ c 9 c d c 0 0~~ - o d d c L N N :~_ Q 3 u N d ~' N m ~ o a N T U C ~ 3 N d C ~+ 7 O d L d ~ d C~ d U N a ~ C N ~i m ° ` U C d E j o f6 C a c0 R °'`-'oa c m~jE o ~'~n - a~~ d ~ v'o °-'a _u n °-'m .o o p, o ~ d d `o N d o ~ `m a v c c = d d > L ~ a~ ... T C > ~ ~ C W C ~ d d L "fi -a d ~ .. C. co~ d = N ` d C d ° G n - ~ > w' ¢ n U n o ~o~j ~ d L ~ o i m d dE o w 'o d N d u ` d N c rn D E > ~ a 7 d ~ el-~~ C « doa 5 md, c Nad c d d~- 0 od ~ ca .~ N 0 y d Y ~ V d C y U d d N ~ U N Q O d C J d N O 0- ~ N m E ,' y N~ O C O N 7 d N y V d n d (0 ~ y N ~ T O) > C O C ~ C • L C N D U~ ~ N 3 C 7 O ~ d ~ E ~ o n~> E a m N ~ ~ ~ d w v ai w c am c .c y ai E L~ °' a 3.c mn.o ¢ a i ~° N d ~ u i a d.~ w m o o ~ dL U'd rnN o f o°- o o c 3°~ ~ o N c ~_ d° E o a d o d N o n U d n ~ v m a o ~ U d ai $ °y r. °: r a ~ r ~ 'w E r~ ~ °m o r~ U aci c ~ U cco ~ ~ ~ E y ' ~ .N. ~ ¢ .. ~ aNa o o dd ~ ~ no o dn~ ~ ~ n~ d r ~ ~ d ~ ;EE ~ a ai ~ me n E d E nc dd m c d " c~ L N d .- C d ~" L N N d r L= O d . d a d d 0 " a y N d + L d O L E > C U N o 0 U J O U a C ~ _ C C O U a U L U d O d d N U N Y d N ~ ~ lp N a d d N j 0 ~ d N d. (p N U j N .- n U Z L N N O y L L d d L L O ~ L L d C t L `01 d L L L d L C n v E-a d d N V ~- > > U ~U o V t-o d V H o~ U H 3Q F- d ¢ ~ X C ~ y ~ C d C d L m a • d a aai L n w - d w - ~ rn o ~ ~ d ~ o 0 c .O ~~ vi ` d N d d Of C C d ~ p ~ d ~ d N d d N a N 1. ' > C > ~ d L T (0 C ~ O O O N ~ d v E ~o a ~ a L C d ~ d d O' ~ c~ ~ y n d m d C' N d ~ . ~ 7 T L , ~ _ d _ ~~, a c c ~ y m > ` m m a c a y d p d m v a o d ~ . 3 ~ 3 'o N c ~ N `d d ~ E d ~ ~ n ~ a >L c °c d dU d d aci d C b N d d .L.. E ~ N ` d ~ N N d O d ~ O ° d oad ~ ~ E ~ cv d ~ c •o E ~ j >. ~ .~~' C d N N ~ L N N d L n T d E d ~ ~ C d m N C d U d C d d E ~ ~ d d O) UO O N d a~ L ~E L p F-U U C ~ w L I-`o ~ d~ L To O w ro P356 O EXHIBIT A r t0 N d C d d O v d C a> t C .~ C R t V N Y d 0 V C W .x d d t C N_ w i0 t N N N j y ~ ~ C G w '- ~ C C O ~ ~ o >. '~ m o m L ~ c v f iri m U N L O n (0 n N ~p fn N C 7 C d C N o ] p d U d a .O - L Y O N N (0 d V N j C N C N~ l0 - > n~ N N E -O N «• Ul ~ (6 E 'C ~ N ~ (6 G d ~ ~ d (6 ~ L ~p O n U L >.~ m da ~ ~ ~ o aiw E _ O °' E ~° w o~ ~ N o v c ~ o w '~ n ei e ~ ai o L E Y d C 'y •-• O N N w N ~ n L N C E ¢ N N .- o d E d U ~- m o U . .. m o ~ . ~ ~ Vi a. c r > ~ v _ ~ m y ~ ~ N = ~ ~ m v v aim E d a? a n o . d o~ m ~ ~ d ~ m Q u N a o ~ v o. c m . ~ rn `~ m m 7 mN ~ E = m a a i c E v c y N n a i v d~ S i n ~o i a y aU~w ~~ av w~ m vD m3 v~ ~ -o ...c~ ~ Nam '• ~ H ~' m L v °i~ v i t0 ~ " ° ~ >:m - ( 7 ~ N f c 'O V7 C c •y d ~ O m Ol p m . .. 7 ~ ~ a i U ` 0 ~ ` N L O N O ~ N C U 7 O N~ W C~ C p L C N { n U C O U 5° = aFC U d C v,d t ) y N m> mL 7 p m O ~ Ec`o y d rnm 'S om ' ~ _ ~ ~w _O ~ m m 'o c d m i x p '~ ~ c ~ 3 rn ~ a3i .3 ~~ ~~ m N rn~ mL °•'E ° ~'° ~' u ~ o _ EO Z °' m Z c 3 0 3 7~ E _ m o m ~ °"' ~ u, m o m m m v ~ v, v , a~ m Z '~ d ~ U a -o m w+ .~ .E ~ a~ G ~° t n= ~ d a o a c Z~ o 0 3 a c m m c E a .- ~ -- 3 U o N Z ~ E c 'E c- Z ~ T j >O ~ O ~ ~ ~ C ~ C C N U .~ .O ~ ~ U O ~ ~ U ~ C) ' C O` n U Y o c v Z N 7 a c -O N . U y C 3 m O d U d m m O E !~ O c~ > d= v Y n n m ~ m `~ ~ m :° c N ~ y ~ °w a ~ ~ m m °. ~ 0 m rn a E~ E m ~ 3~ oa . a i > w ~ v o m 3 a o a~ a i ~ °~- ~ ~ °.m v o ~ d ~ ~ m,~ a E~ °~ m m m .N O ~ o~ c~ ° C c a~ ¢ U ~ °~~ m e E d o o U C a o - y ° ~ d o rn C c v 'c m m U p E . o n o y .~ E a m m m c ~ `" ~ n c ?3 L n -' p o c E ~ d a d w o o ~ n E ~ W c y y N~ 7 0) x c W O O ~ y m ~~ N ~ 3 N U O 2A o O p n ~ m > O N~ O O N 41 L d O C ..• 'N in r L O 'y L T A ~ a E 0 "- D O ~ O N y y •~ a a~ U'a '~ c c U ~ c U o. U ~~ a~ p~ ~ c ~ ~~ m ~ O~ 7 c a; ~ o. ~ 70' o> Q ~~ R N m 0 m E~ ~ ~ . d m> ~ d ai o '> C U h . O ~~ n~~ U N N x X d N N L U L~ U F ~ C ,= 0 L F U U O O C~ ~ ~ O N N Q' 0 y fn ~ 7 =• U d {p N O N N C N U E o aci m y L m . c 7 d U N a ~ o a .L.. ~ C y ~ ~ N ~ (0 C O 'O V N f0 ~ tll L d C E ~ d "' L O N U ~ E y y 0 DO C .. ~ w O 7 Y .N T ... >. .. . O 7 h «1 d U iC d U L ~ C V Q 'C d C ~ ~ N O O T O ' .L-. O O E ~ (0 O' ~ y C y 3 n ~ y ' N y ~ nE N ' N C m l0 7 0 a e ~ d . °' O m o i a U N ~ - ' o in y O a O (0 > d f0 ~ ~ rn o~ c n d o~ E~ o. _ ~ E 7 n~ O rn n C C o d E N C ~ ~ L >. U C d C~ N N O ' U U O '~ N U U N O N N c .. -o N ~ m m ~~ C . y E° L ~ w f0 E '~ n L m o ~ ~ 7 m a o m a a~ 3 0 o rn y a m m ~ ° n ' p ~ o ~'. O C O ~ W m N ~ d w .o ~ "0 C r O C C F- C O 0 N N N ' ~ ~ a p y doom ~ c E L N ~£ E o w ~ . w v a s _ E v° ~ Y c ' a° o c ' L w= ~ ~ °~ E ~ o ~ mo y fl U N agc y E N " gy ~ m °'` n E N m'~ E ~ p, y 'O (0 L O) ~- ¢ E m ~ -O o ~ C_ C ~ d O h O -~ U N j U~ C~ O ~ V U~ C . O ° ~ m o ' N C m O N 3 m ~ m - n oU o ~ ~ d~ w S N ' -p L ~ m n d m >. d y m c c >: c o c7i "' c ~ c7i a~ d ' ' w e `o ~ c7i c~ d m u m a c o ~ O a~ L o ~ c L U =- m n 0 L 'O L~ p Q ~ 0 7 d L (0 C ° L d 7 2 H o ¢ H ~ U~ U d ¢~ F- > N h£ U h P357 O N L w d C1 C L V ~+ d O T O~ O N C O C L 3 O O 7 L C y U '~O- j 0~ N N A l0 ~ ) ~> N 9 ~ C C U ~~ : ~~ ~ ~ >, d Z `o~ ~p v c N o C ' ~ ~ N W `= " d ~ d 7 IO ~ N O ~ > ~ N C N ~ _ ~ 7 ~ 7 = - p ~ ~ (0 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ N U o d o U o ' o _ c d E o- a d N .~ N ~ C1 j ~ . > ~ o m e °~ ~ ~ m oao' ~~ (0 Q L 300-m ~ N N O~ d ~ ~ L ~ O ~ dv~ 7 m p c w a . -. 'y C N d p .O• E Z O o 3> N C N N r C O ~` ~ N NL o N E o~~ o d'- C L c~-... m d v m y~ N L ~ ¢ d N L 9 U~ O N O. lO N E° w a y ~d~a `'= mm o Ec c ,_ =mE d = w o w U.L.. N y C d ~w ° y C~ `O L N lL O ~ y ~ L~ >~ C O C C N E U U N N C V~ v m ~ L N E N C y U d O -O O ~ r N d. v a~ m y o o~ ~ H E ~ o ~ 4 N I c co m ~ r m o~> c-w. o c `" y ~ o y E ~ N c m o o L F E . ~''ci ~ CFO m y N 7 oY a c v i m > a a~ d . ~ m o x m N o~ U . c o . c y 0 ~ ~ y ~ a o ~ ~ C C U r0 d N y W y d 0 y U N 70 .N.. p ~ ~ D1 y ~ E ` N m o 7. o m a w ~' ~~ 'p w N e ~ U C o ` ~ .N ~ d o x o y ° y ~ m c . .. ~ c ~ '~ v ~~ d~ v o m ° ~ ~' '° ~ V ~ n E r L c d E o ~ y E y ~ N d ~~ O L L U O C Z E o U U N IO ' N y U¢ N C N NLQL fn y nay 3 f0 O ~ d T ~ ~ a ~ y (O L E LU CL O C O!~ G o ~ L m 3 m'3 ) ; U c w m'~ S a 7 ~ o i ~ . .. ~ U O r O) p N N E '~ E 'v o. a ro~~a oo°'m5~.°~ c a ~ o ~ ocU mt ~ m° c 3~ N 7) C U O Z a ~ ~ d C ~ 9 U O C .. o~ N y L N ~ y ~ 3 d~ 01 ~ > rL. ` 0 O C -_ C~ O y m i O O D N C V O N N E O m d f0 ~= N a E i N ~ O> T O) :-: C y N m '- > V N N d N N . . N O o v f0 C ~p n N N a .x ' E U N V -' ~ ' E O U C m C ~N C .+ '- 'NO ~ 7 a y~ r y E r C N a '0 N :.. w 'X ~ N ~ N 2 ~ y d y y ~ y E = 0) d .. N A V U C N L 47 O N O U ~ ~ a N d Q' X N 3 d 7 d m f0 ' O L O L L !n N d C 0 f6 d C f0 ' F~ a . ~ ,~ C C O O a d N O N ~ U ~ ~ C N >` '-' U ~1 d cc y C E ` N N N N = C O) ~ m' 0 3 y c 01 '~ 0) d o ~ c~~ g N N a m d ~ L O U u ~ E ~ y° ~ S X U ~° Q E o ~ L m p ~ .. d . n y o~ ~O ~ N c a~ p~ '- m ~ N . m o~ ~ 3 d ~ L ~ ~ d m c d L ~ r E :o aLO, ~`o E m ` m e m o °o d p U -o E a c ~ a U~ y f0 y y~ r d U '"N-" " V c ` = ~ L cis m m7ciL ~o m co m° ~~ ~a ~ c' i ~ m c i ~ c°,aL U °~ w ~a c i ~a 0 L s c_ ~ o ~ ~ m 3 c_ v ° o ~ ~ a w ~ ~ ~ ~ d L . ~ ~' w U ~ ai ~ g c 7 c d o w ~ > ~ y c 7 d ~ c ' v U 'o N w 7 , - C d v d n l6 c C d ~ ` N :4 U E m s 7~ ' ~ (0 N a L U (0 d y C N N ~ ~ 7 U y C N C_ N > O~ O V N U C N O O U 'O L- O ~ O L N a C (p y ~ (6 U ' n 7 ~ ~ - O. ° ~ . . 7 ~ N r o v ~ o a a -o >. o d ° cO y 7 07 d C '41 N 7 N C ~ 7 3 L P L >o v o O 3 v ~ ~ c O N v L d a° U ~ N o d ~ U o m C a a ~ ~j . N 3 N m L C o m - > U 0 3 ~ d ` m - m ° U m a ~ o $ c c '~ . o o o m .N.. d C C ° `O O E N ~ Z C .N. n N C ~ L c E ~ a~ a 3 N m ~' y 7 ~ c d~ 4 d d 3 m m a i ' ~a~ ~ m E~ v m m m ~ c m d ~~ N ~ >. ~ p~ dy ~ w EU 'S m'in > °~ m ~' o E m L c~ °«N. E o o Qo . cp ~ c c R C N N ~L O C C O N O 3 ~ E d E a N ., O E U N >. ~ >. E N N 7 T E C~ U 7 O d N lL N L `~ t i~ O ~ U `~ C U N '- N C N 7 N U m 7 N Up L d N F E~ O L QU `0 0 aL~ J N Up C 7 w~ ~ L ` .. ¢ ~ o d O v d C d t C H d c0 t v d Y d a 0 U H •X d d L_ C Nl R L P358 0 x .` r R d C R t U d Y d a O V d c m s C y d 01 C !C t V d d U m C .~ d d t C: N R t N N N N Y O 7 N f0 l0 c O d N ° ' _ O ~ 3 L a i ~ N ~ ~ c_ c O m N a . m d a d C Q m ~ E (0 N N N d p C C .L.. O L ). _ O1 ~ l~0 (CO ~ (0 U O n C p N N m O N v1 C U m 0) ~ a N ?= N C ~ ~ a N C U N ~ (6 l0 a te ~ ~ N A C 'C N - C a R N y ~ ~ O . A N ? R N m R n p C a >. f0 i C N U a~ C U y~ T C- O f6 0 y 7 m c `~ `-° `m d E ~ m c 'o ~ 5 o E 3 o c y 7 n S c 'U ~ c d oo F m U O a ~ ~° N m N c~ N ~ 10 °~ U° N ~ o E E d ` r~ m d o 7 m. >, ~~~ m ° a o o y. y N E c -x E o a N rn S a~ a~ o~ ~ o Y ~ o d E~ y R m a m a Q~ ~ w m a ~ c 0 N> U y n w ~> ° ~% 7 r i U E `m ~ o. N H - a o c m N c O a> m R o no d n N o rn c O N L N O G~ 3 N~ U (0 w ~ ' N U L ' U C j ~ N N 70 O tl1 L" 3~ 'O . C O O O ff ~ !' y O. 70 a °' N ~ (C ~ 3 H N N a ~ V C T C ~ N ~ ~~ m ? E C ~ ° o a i ~ ~ S ~ ° w ~° N G v 3~ ~ d c ~ ~ n a a a c o m ?, 4 '~ y ~ m. a N « d . ~~ . R L~ N o U ~ d m~ c ° `p ° o U~ ' N E d a ~ c N a~ ~ 7 0' F O V m ~ c ' R ° N~ w E 'i E L y ~ ~ o ' 7 7 0 (O a E C C N N _ c m N a R r ~ L d C N~ N F C . ~ d e C N , ~ N O E- a C ~ . . c 'p - C C U O U N C N~ ~~ L . .. n n N n p E N U . c .L. a m C t p p N J m o ~ ai ~ c °' ~ N m~ y v~ N m m E R ~ > o ° N d V E N aNiU~QOO ~~ T° o 'i =aci~O c 'c . ;nc~° ao>jEm N yU 7 a ~Eo°' aai U~ U ~ ~~ ~ U~ ~ n 'X a O c N ~ m ° o ai o v a n E °-' N m a .o ° :.. o a° R d a c ° oL O~ _ U U m d d -~ cLi ~ p N o. U -E- ~~~ O R R C ~ L ~ m - m `o ~ Q ~ . . (0 N L R N L N 3 N~~ O. C "' d r J rq y C O N a E N ~ X O N w N C ?~ N ' C y . O ~ O) R L N U y ~ a R N N ~p (") ~ E ~' o a Doc ~ :~ N ~ a d m N m E ~ N E c~ N d o L rn w ~ 9° ~ d d R ~ L a O C R 10 -O N a C n L ~y a a' ~ U O ~ N p O C O ~ L N L O O L N N N o. m~ d ° g ~ m r> ~ N voi a a R m d o w d o y ~ ~ ~ Q a~ L d c a > d c° X. m U o W a ~ c c N a E y L N v N a r ~ m R ro o r m m ° ~ E `~ ° E ~ a v m o a , m ~ ~~ t- .. ~ d~ a ~ m 2~ , N L ,, -_ E ~' a v mL ~m ~ a o ~ aU o M a i N vi mU~ ~ ~d ° c ° r i °m~a n ^ voa d°~ n7 n a~O ~ ~ ... Ry ~ ~ a ~ v~ i ac m c a i (n ~~ c ~ lD ~ ~ a- ~ ~ W a rn N (0 C ` N l9 ~ ~ rn' a N y a N O a (0 ma~~ao L 0 U R '' N L d fA O " L O C m c U a~ 7 Uo ~ L ~ d ., d d N U m a g T 3 Uo~~ ~ ocda U mo m y C N 7 0 0 0 N N d R ' N ~- W N y C a N- L> N n {p N U H i t E m L ~ H m U FL- ~ H ~ =o ~ U F m C7 ~~ m ~ ~ H N E U H ~ v v . N N N ~ a d N L N _ (0 U f6 ... (0 T «~ -. . E~ a oQU `o a d w N N y N v m E ~ m° ° ~ E E E m N N y _ ~ , m L L N U y N N L O N L.. ~ N U (0 r r r U y ~ N ~ N C d U N n~ 7 > > C d U N o> O a ~p ~ ~ C ~~ O a O ~ O a m as m o ~ m '~ U a E m m m ~ a m ~. a~ a a o. ~, ,n o y a~ a d a a~ a u~ m~ ~ m o U m ~ w c a`> o U 0 U 0 U ~ c ~ m y ~ o ~ ~' ° ' o N m E c c c E 3 ~y a (0 O L N N fq (0 ?. = axi m o m 3 axi axi axi d (0 ~ L N ' A N C L L L r - _ ~ (0 p Y rJ .... .... (0 E OC1 C_ ~ N _ O C_ C_ C_ N N 'C c C o L 3 y 7 O) U c C o C 0 C 0 N - N y N . ~~ .C N .y .N CO > n U (0 R~ 3 U U U ~ (0 mod„ L N O E '- N ` N N N E ~ a C o O d N a a s G 3E d c~c ° - ai - m - ~ T ~ C D , N y E 7 ~ ~ C l0 N '- N O '- N ~ .--. ~ N N N N N C ~ N d E R ~ ai 3 a R ~ m d d ~ ai a U a L N ` C U N d C F - F o ~ m F H H ~ U P359 O v L d C1 R L d Y a m ° >, o v N' N w O O N C C N ~ N N (6 ~ N N ~ N (0 O ' D O N O d . J L 'O N J N 'O J N O O C N 3 0 N V C C C N C L ~ N N C f L~~ N~ O C ` (0 9 O N O V C U C J C C U ~ (6 a d b ~ D . = m c o a d o m o~ m-JO o~ . m U c ~ N~ w ~ ~ NL... d C O. '-' ~ C C ... _ .O L... C N ~ ~ C N U ~ ~ > p '_' O O • _ ~ O N~ L y J~ N N > N N J t0 a C N N O O N E n N C m LL J N v d° ° '• N c ~ C . O ~ ~ 2 J (0 N ~ y N N J t ~` N N N Y 0 0 N O N C 3 _ V 9 N c N L .O O H C N f0 >- 3- O N ~ J ~ (6 `y .O T O ~ ~ c N ~ .O 0 m ~ O ~ d 'O ~ O lL C Ol ... J C N (0 O O. ~~ V N '- X N r0 U N N~ N U ~ N~ N >` C O C~ p C C U ~ E U N L~ C O N (6 7 d J c7 a o 'N y c ~ :°• m o a c -o ` ~ y 3 ti m r J~ o in ° ~~ ~ ' O- c N `` u ° c c c 3 ~ a ~.'~ v 3 o v . . m m c ~ m - c o f " ~ o 3 E m ° a L ~° t ~~ •n ~U E E ~ c j °' ~o N `"ym ~O wy ' - . , i . a lU U N 3~ N r/i O C ~ ~ ' o > ~ a i 7~ ~ o 3 Q N N V N N ~ N O 0 0 _ of N G V V O O. N O C j y ~ M 41 J N a C O N ~ U C~ 3 O) (0 N N N C C (0 N 0 N N U ~+ X y 'O "O C U ~ C .L.. .~ (0 _ o c m o~~ ' ~ E d m d O L > > E o v c ~~ c y 'c o m m' ~ N c .o N ~ ~ a ~ a j N vi m o a E d E o .N O N N N ` N O d ~% c ° m o~ N~ m~ ~ ~ v i m ~~~ o o LL N m J~~ o~~ d r n U 3 ~ y -o v 'N ` ' ° N U ~ c 3~ 3 m ~~ N y d ~ E O` m ~~ a~ ~ ~ i J c a c o~ E ~ d c~ o c ~ ~ E c v L > '° v ~ E > O n i t ? aci No a~ N` N L j N 0 ~ N O Q O i a C7 o N (0 i a Q o C C C E ~ - N . N >` ~ U c w. w~ v~ N 3~ ° c C7 _ v s m ~ r . -. a~ N > o. a J c a o v N vc ~° ;J° N N ~ J ~ T ~ m Q a N ~ m d > ~ E Q m c J e v a c L C N 3~ ~ ` N N M v i (0 C M Y ~ M C C C- M N O .d N i a ~ L > 2~ Q N 01 O~ 0 3 .O a~~ d ~-~ h U O I~ N C ~° ~ U r J O) O. 'O c m~ ~ .G O dN m _c mcm m m n Lmc ~ ~ 3~y ~ ~ no:~ = m ~ ~ E E E ~ ~ ~ J o m'N rn rn moa. ~ >~ V Nw~o U °: ~w °: ~a .°.' oo of :: ~ =nNC o Em~cd ~ Nmw 3'°' N>> N m U m~' >>c >~ o~aw ~ °v O~ C N L m V m L NU i m N to m O my ~ L O p~ ~p ~ N t L (0 ~- L L N N L N N~ N c L p - j N L d> O v2 a Ha v F52 U H ~~ U HLa U ~Od O co U ti ~ o.~ v mQwm _N N N N L (6 +~ N "O N is ~_ ... ~p '>' ` 3 C O W ~ N X ~ L O U N :p ` ooU d N ~ ~ 3 mN N O r N o E L N ` N __ (6 N m ~ ~ O N nac U 'c d (n H y m o U ~c O O) c _ L L N N .~ N N O `o ~ O N in ` G ~ 'y ~ o~ v -° o c° L ' 'o ° o v °' m w c moo m~ oao~ ~ ~ ~ N d ~ N d O N w J N 7 0 L.. N O O ~ ~ O M' in O y N~ N~ w N N 'O N a: c ~' L y o d cv m ~- S m= a'c r°n c o - ca m 3 ~ m o 3 3 N o. m m L o w = y c m o ~~ N c i ~ O o E w m d 3= (0 a U 'v x ~ N L IO U lL 'O C N N L l6 N ~ C ~ N C ~~ y ~~~ O ~ N C N N . . w n N L 0 0 N d N w C 'O p N N O O L l6 ~ ~ w ~. a o 'o N L ° c U m a o n U N O ~ y a rn w w ~ v w w d N w m e v w C S C C W 'O m 2 02 C C` L O C "'~ E N f0 'O ~ p ~ N O `~ ' V (0 IO N "O 'O N O N N J N N `~ O ~ ~ N y 'O N (6 > C O (p C E- ~ (6 W N~ C N~ d~ ~ IO N j~ N N N O N N N y L ~ ~ O d N N N O N N f0 C ~p C ~ N T~ .- l6 N N O. L N C m = p N '~ N O m E> ~~ > E ~ U aNi E N E N -o v E i L a~ E ~ m .L . ' ~= a . ° m y~ m e ~ ~. a ~ ° >. v ~ o ~ o d ~ O rn ~ (p O C J N f0 O C C t N d N ° N L 7 J U (U U 'O J U~ !~ U C~ 'O O J U 'O H C U O d O V d d t C y d C1 C l6 t v T N O V C H .~ d d t H R Z P360 0 N P361 C~ G d C !0 t V d Y v ~ ~ ° ~' ~m c ~ c o °E c 0 rU - m L c c m ° w m v C U m v c c ° o ->~ w ~ a ~ alm N n m o mo 3 c ~ 3 w ~ ~ c c o a ` ~ ~° ' ~ ' i E a O N N l6 d y vi O p m ~ a ~- - ~ N aNi ='' o-"c3 C a` l~lco C turn ~a°i Q v l/I ag c o~ m ~ ~` , ~ 4-~o°m ~ c UN m n E 7 a E w o 0 0 c v > m °~ n m 'w c U o ru > N m N ° c o °1 c E m rn m N >, m m o m~ ~Ooy'c~ ~_wua~ o d`rnd cc .. o w acim c .N N N c ~ E ~ c c ~ ~ - -° U p c ru v o d ~ g ~ ~ ._ a i o d w o (0 ~ ~ i a 7 'O N y - ~~ L fn X~ V N N N~ 3 ` C C .~ m E U ~ - f0 > j 0 N y ~ 3 m w ~ pl o m y 'v T m a c o c ~ ° o w y N _ m u O) L U C •' N c~ y y N O' (L d ~ O d~ N ` ~ _ C ~ N N U m° c N .~ N~~ d ~ c l`a y m m ~l c N C7 > d o aoi y rn y E d a07i c n~ 3~ ili U m f0 ~ d (~ C~ m ~0 c U ~ a In . o `m v .ol c ~ m ° c 7 ~ 5 ' o d > ~ ~ v c m m E y N o h i a v c °' al m e m= > L d' ' m U m E ~° ~ d > m ~ ~a 'c a m m o o y x a~ n d N 7 E a al c c 3 U , al m p N G ° v ~ in ai ° n ~ v A ` ~ ° N r o ~ o c L ~ o ° c n -7 ~ m i °' a ` ~ c r c v 7 i y a ~ c i a ' v ° l3 . am. ~ o 2 -~- N oU°cm o- ~ ~y r ~° - C ~ O y ~m m`~ (/1 N O ' ~ N >. " ' N N ~ l ~ N N ~. w o O~ N ~ o w N l/l ' C X L°l C cam :caa~ c am3o ; y m ~ o c N c x ` om d N ~ m~ n ~ o ~ E o c ° ~ E ~ ~ ~ °' o ld loll ~ O N O >. y X N (6 y~ w0 O ~ .N.. y L ~ -NO F' C U .0.. N LL (6 N y N N 'y m N 'C d `7 ~ U~ y 3 CI C G O ~ (0 N W ~ N~ 7 0 C V L O~ Cd U n~ O .O l N 7 L G tL m a~ E~ W y ~ U c m N E -o d C ro ' o ~ to E 'a N n Q ~ n~ t~ o a a c -o m w ~_ ~ o E c n '> o :° m a o ~' ~ ~ n~ 3 d 0 ~ n N 7 O N ~ ~ O 'N N C O U O) J C j N N N V y C OD n~ (0 O V L N L U N O ~ a ~> O) p N ? ¢ OO O V O O" >. C . 'j ~ <, o c o v, m m 3 o c m L c~ al a vl o ` c ~ vi n _ i ru C N E d o ~ ~ o- r N U C w ~ > d V n C~ N L N ~ E lA d r N d a °' O ~ G y ~ ~ y ~ N n~ d O N d ~ ~ 0 7 N C ~ ~ O L . L C O m 'O O) C n L L > U C (0 ~ (0 N d a. p O. O m " O) 3 ~ C O C Q N .. ` . N fU T d a+ U YO N c a C 0 . .. O N ~+ U~ N 7 a !-' C t ~ v L r m c~ c a°i a~0i a>i e o t L ~ m ~ v~ ° c > t L m O w d n ~ i a a i m x O F ~ U F- 3w'!' d E ~ W n° U F-;'U (7 ~m h ~m U H C J Ew a d 3 c o C ~ a i N N (p W y > (0 C O Y ~ C ~ ~ N (6 ~ ~ d T L ~7 O U ~ N d - 0 ~ N (6 d C ~ ~ d l E c 3 m m N _ c ' ° rn ~ ~ ~ c ~ o L d E ~ °- Y c o O ° o E m 'S r 'o c U U ~ E V m d o- o ~ N N N O ~ L L C c ~ L_ d N D n d m ~j «. c ... c N ~ E ~ ~ 3 C o m N Q O N ~ N n r N N N N d C fN • l6 ~ S O N d N a ~ a to a N ~ C G °' v v V U c C d 7 N (p 3w v f6 O' N c N f0 lU _ O U a v l6 c v 3 c= w ` >' c a c d ~ m ~ ~ o c ~ m m~ c 3 m d d w ~ ~ `m ~ U~ ~ ~ c (0 o O C 7 J ... d C C C N N f0 ' m L ~O ~ ~ y L C c 01 lp o C o C N C O ~ O n d o O n `o v~ _ ~ w w O p~~ rn m Q ~ ~ v ~ o n a~ 'o .~ .m U Q¢ d m ~ ~~ c O U E .L-. n C = C = A C C O) N W ~ N E ru x ~ o ' o ' o m o a c ~ Y v m °_ >; d ~ ~ ~ ~ d E a N m ~ d O) U ~ m m Y l6 N - O - C N p C C O N d y O C d 7' U j E L C N C d d G y ~ N U~ H~ U m (7 U' N ~ U' ~ ~ N J ~ j U > L > F p m d O V 3 N C N t C_ N d C1 R s d Y d O V C N ~X d d L_ C H s 0 L r l0 O1 C d Y `0 3 o d a~ > m C N 'O d N C O C Z > ~ d m _ ~ O ~i -c O~ °~ c O ~p m N O) f >' = o O)L_. N a ~ c N c c o c o v ° y ~ o ` ~ °i L 3 c c 7 7 ~ ~ ~ . ~ c ~ ~ « a a :o o c c ._ ~ o m~ a> E -o o~ c i _ ` o N n ~ d c c '~ m '° m a m m ~nm - v m ~ o E U=oma~E ~o mY o0 0~ cm C vi m N e ~ L O O U U 0 a- N L c y Y N N d 4: . N N C d N N j N ~ - 0 -- N N a ~~ ai Ol m a m N s m a~ o ~ v L c d d c 3 ~ >. E 'J ~ y a m ~ c ~o ~ 7 o- d H N E ~ T -o ° D U O ~ n an w c i 7 ~ c ~ c ~ o d E a~ m y ~ c i ~ o~ m - m d c m ~ ' ~ ° m e ' m J n c `n O _ c Q ~ p m o a c ° 7o 9 N c ~ ° m m c ~ o~ N i o. a n c o m N v aid a i mE i° NOOL~ ` ~,~ v ~J~ ~ my ~~v~ ~avi m E ~ N c o m d d 9~ o EL mo - ~ c o ~ m N ' w y c y o o v w o - J m aw ~m~ ... o om .~ c p ad .~ y w c oco ' d i ~v ~ ~ m S y s ~~ d m a °o m E R m y i~ ~ d `m ~ 3 N ~ o m m m 5 O N E O O N ~ U O N N~ N~ N N 7 i0 C L > O y N N N ~ v U O) n ~ N O O) C O Q (0 N w C~ N C ~ L~ L N V N L p 0 ~~~ ~Y N ' Q> o°'Z'=d ~ ;'EE v "uc N L_ o. ... o3~ :N ~ S o tn ~ m c> o m a~ -p o 3 N. m > E `m y ~ E ~ ~ in E o c z ~ m J ~ c ~ ~ ~ `n ~ °' m E ° x ~ c a i d . `oa`' `oo E 3o~ v `oo5 a i ~~ a i vEy - a`mm 0 o -o d L iN a E o N E ~ n v o c c A a ~i ~ m 'v m Y y ~ a cUN d J ~ ~ . Q? L ~.- y o ~ cv ~ c o ~+o a m ~ ' '~ E ' y o ~o ~ ° ~ ° G _ ' c ~ ov ~ ° m o c -~ ° c ~ ~ 3 c ' E ° v ° - 3 a i c >, L n ° ' o' i d a a ~ d x c N d N o- ~° N E d N U D v ~+ N d m c -p O N 0 ~ C c~ O O 7 ~e ~ .. = ai ~ N C 'O a c y Y a v m N m N N 0. 7 N C N L O (0 N 7 . .. 0 J~ N~ O U ,~ O" {p N J O N ' > N N C N V N an d a J a a .° O ~ u c -v ~ 2 d o~ a ~~ 3 r n 9 = n L o N ~ °~ c ~ ~° ~ o ~ m ° E v ~ rn~ ' ~~ d d o c x N N ~ L ~ i v c N w ~ o i d ~ n m~ e co m t ao m m ° m ~ ° m S ~ 'N n a m m' ' d ~ c ~ ~ o n ~ ~ ' ~ ~ c ~ 'vi c ' o ~ a c~ c ~ m m~ O N N~ c ~ v ~ . o y w o ~ n ,~ v ~ v ~ o c N v c a~ v ~ o d n 3 E c U g N,_ N ' p ~ ~. oa ~ c o- y ~ a m ~ E y L s°~ v t r ° L ~ >' c° o 3 c o~ L~ a i ~ a i o a~ ` a i ' a i n y ~ ! ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d U H d N C o U F- a U ~ c~ v~ Z m c Q U E H c E C '^ ~O N . C N ~ > C '- 7 ~ 3 C CO d d N > O p L 01 LL~ O N U ~ d c ~ - m e m U a~ m v a ~ ~ ~ ~ `o >. LL J d c ~ o ,n y m d rn m c a " E Y d m -O OC1 C N O C U '..0- (U N O T 7 O N O .O i6 O E y 'O N E~ L U C N E d 7 N 0 P V C N ~ 3 y N N N N N (p C O N _ J a N N ~ ~ N ~ U O N N C (0 L m -p N C N 'O J ~ T _ . ~ ~ m m >, v m o O ' o .~ c m 3 E rn c N y ° c m m N O c N ~ J c (6 Q _T' C~ " ~ Y ~ 'j d Y ~ ~. d m ~ g c _ ~ m m o. v d ~ n N o _ c L E u~ m 7 E N y m m ~ ° o ° ° c m E ~ O 3 o m E ~ w v c i a E d v ~ E .L . 3 N m m o o d l0 N E O U l9 O) ~_ T~ U L V y N ~ C ~ o m $ c rn ~ c J m c~ o d E m in ~ ~ - ~ n c d m ai ' ` `p C ~ J m O '~ m~ ' S m E -O U (6 O O L f0 N C L C ~ Y C y ~~ ~ ~ N U N U ~ d ~ m L 0 O' N N n ... N N O C C N N N y O J ._ n d _ ( N n C O O)U O) ~ N.L.. d.L. ~L... U L ~- O N C f0 O U C C C ~ E C N N O ?~ N C n >. C_ W L Y N O O C O) C N~ N B ~ ~ °~ J N ~ C C~ N ~ N C N ~ N O N _ y N N J N O ~ N O p ~ n U ° ` O E J j x N O N t n N N N N L ~ N L N O N ~~ t~ r w V C > N m 3 T w O L N N ' J .. J . ... ~ U U (6 O N F- N H O O m L a ~ U F Q L.. d O V 3 d c d t C .y d C l0 L V T Y d U C H ~X d d L_ C N R t P362 0 r P363 w lC d R t d Y m a y v; rn _ ~° ~ ~ ~° n; ~ v~ o c d d y U o'~ a~ cn ~ c m m. o me c m m ~ O m~ c y o d m N >, o m v v'~n ~ a~ p o m Y m N c o. c~ a m ~~ ,n ~ E c c N p n aY ~ - y ~~ ~ m a n N L r E m y ~ `m of a N `m~ me o3 3= a°~ mr~~ dam' ~ ~ t a iw ``- ` ~ T n ~ c ° m ~ ~ ti ~ d m 3 c o E m ~ o - m U o `m "`a a a i m av . o~~ E ~~- E _ U a° o c ~ -o rn c m p o ~ c p ~ y c N c m v N ~ m d u ~ aNi ~ w ~ D N~ ° n ~ o m ~ 2 to ~' E y N 3 cmi o m~ ~~= o N o ` d n c m m a E r ~ a m L m c ~ ~= ~ O ~ E U C N N N a= N 0 L N V O U ~ N~ Q U O C _ .~ lL . C 3 U m~ C m O] N m C C~ a O ' O) O O) ~~ n d m ~ C O O N V a m O C O N C N N ry N~ C °i C C O Q U d d m C E N O N V O y N y =0 (0 U C ~+ L L d m ~~ ~~ ~ V? N in ~ 0 C ~ m T T~ 'm O > L N 'O a C a y C0 ~ 7 m O N d ~ ' 3 r .m o ~ ~ ' 3 n 5 c ' ? ~ d. y n o ' d d d L rn m n a c Z` ~ o mU 3 c dc N m cnm u m3 rn . ~ om. .. c3 . E~om ~ c N c m ~ ~ 'o y° ~ ~ E m o ~ O c ~ w N N E O ~ a; ~ '~ ° w o o m y a i c ~ - n `° ° ` c X a c rn ' 0 o. ~ ~° E C in ° ° ~ ~ ' N ~ _ ~° c a i fp o r n ~ ' i a y m o ' 0 '~ y . m o ~ c m ~ ~ m o ~ t N o m te • d ~ O N v~ ' ~ ° C c o~ ~ c N ° d o ~ ~ c vi E~ v v i ~ °- a ~ d ~~ m o m co . ~ L v L a; o m c°~ a d E E E d d ~ ~ m ~ o N a ~ aNi m c ~ m~ y ° N N ~ ~ '~ c ~ ~~ x N o -o E ~ ~ m '9 ~' d m m E ~ N S m p c~ °' a ' , o ~ ~ E r ~ E m o- C7 ~ E o d N r E ~ a 'c o ~ Q m ` d ~ u i m m m E ~ E d m m d ~ o d d o c ~' m c m ' ° F- c o E in d o ~ U y -o L C ~ y m y y m ~o ° n- y Y '~ Y U vL » o ' `t o ° d a U c cF m nE. nN.o c c O me > ~ ._ m ~ o m y . d= y m U'o Q c ~ ~ To 3 E E 3 y~ N y ~ n c c c Yi d- o ~c,m, a d~ o a ~ma y wm r ~v~ ~Emp ~ ma~- °'v v~ m L ~~ 3 °~ -o m` o a c V N o. E m o 3 ~ y y` '~ ° m N w ~ m ,° o N 'm o-'- m~ a i S c rn° n m m y L n m o> ~ c o ~ 0 9 r ~'` c° i. 2 >.= c °~ ~ m a~ 3 ~ m c c Q d -o ~ m c° m vi ' c r ~ U ~° n .- L m U~ L ~. ~ ° ~ E r a~ n o ~ v U ° y° n U U N r. r a c m o ~ v ~ m .L.. c ~ >, c ~ a~ d m c ~ 3 c ~ 3 c° ~ L m f0 U m c o m 3 E >. ai 3 ~ ~ c o p m ~- o ' a in d m C ° m~ a i :: m m 4 :: °' m °o :: d a i a ~ a i E m c m a a; o a~ d ~ U C E 0 0 0 O' N 4 m N l L ;G O A L L tpi~ 'O L in j N C L~ 7 L O N O O L ~ 3 0 O O m N Z U J~ m m w E E U F p> U F- ° o U w n L o ~ in N F- c rn U E U v~ ~ ~ w° S m N ~ d N L ~ m N_ U O N 3 O (0 m L ~ y N >. y d >. U o aci d v U .. c a m N U m m w ° ~ U d d Fm c a i m n E _ .O E _ O N O O N O N °~ m C - N N C N C ~ O U N ~ U N N N C O •~ C N O a Oi d ~ 4 'c a U ~ Emc . -. E m ~ m ~ m > o ' d ~ c ._ w o o o m Y c a ° m a p N N ~ ° d c v m d= o n-- mo N ~ N N O' ~ ~ -p N N d ~' C m c w C ~ 7 ~ m n ~ 7 d " y O L L O O Q N O ~ C O C U O V m .. C >. U y N V m c m c N ` N C O C N o 'O O y N a ~ m N a O o C c d O O m ai ~ an d C m 0 c m m c o o c c ~ y E N ~ m w ° p m o Y ~ o '~ m ~ m ~ c o ~ L o c m c m ° ~ 3 N m d y a n $ a a~ N a~ `m m L ~ E 2 ° ° a~i m -o ~ E y ~ ~ c y ~ D ~ y o o c~ m o '~ ° '~ m ° °- v o U as T ~ 3 3 ~~ ~ c c m ~ n m ~ d c m d m aci c mm rn c c a~ ~•= o m m~ rn S ~ c c `~ m _ N .N U -N' ~ ~ a Y m N Y d U m C~ +T, . ~ m ~ O d G m d m E N N7 y U m `7 - N C _ j C d ~ d E ~~ C LL °i O ~ C 'L" °~ ~ O U ~ C ~ ai ~ o ° U d y E n U m c ~ C T U m '° ~' U ~C n .N E O C C O ~• a~ L O O O N o m L O~ X d L O) 01 ' C . . m J U (11 a a . U (n w ~ f N m O () w~ d '~ O v d L C H d m C R t v A d Y d O U 01 C H .x d d t C .y s 0 x ~L w d C t U d d O 'L" T C N m an d U w ° m y m N y -o C ° E O L m O) ? o m ~ C aci ~ ~ c rn ayi _ ~ m d L '~ 'o a ~ n m U C v ~~ m L.. - o~ m N C: m o ~ ~ o- d L N a ~ ° ~, N O ; ~~ ~ N N m L T N m ° N E ~ N O ~ . >~ N N m N L C N O C y 0/ V ~ ~ N C N o ~ ~' ° o ai E m v a d m ~. m n-° ~ E m ~ C O) ~ N S] C > _ m y w V N N ~ N ~ L °'-° of ` °i m o EE mN ,°'e°-' N x -N' ~v E°w' oa arc d d m~ y ° oo cd ~ U ~ _ d d `~ N v E d .~..' O N N V ~ y ... O ~ O a E c d~ L d ~ a x N m E ~ d c L °~ v o d o ._ y 1] C V j E C O •m 'p ''^- 7 L C C Yl N O C y 3 y a~ y ? d o o a N m ~ r ~' a;g 7 m ayi E ~ a i ~ ~ ' a o d° c o ~ c i o ~ r w a ~ o ~ ~ . c L p 0 ~ i a E m m ~ o c d n N m a ~ c '> > • N '~ o c °~ d w m a~ c A N N c ~ v d a 1] ~ ~ d i a ° N r c n E v N :. y a o m K L C > m m° .. ~ C y ~ ~ N m N N C ' ~ S] L m N CN ~ U N N~ C i C °~ N O ~O ~ d N ' N N wV m ' N " C T C N ~ ~ m D'iA G U r6U O A . ''°~'' ° d S] m e ~ '" L E d v N °' E N... c E i R s> ~ -o a ayi ' N- c °' c an • _ . c rn N ~ ~ vi v ~~ 3~ d d y E . d '` ~ L c o E '~ a ~ F- m y . m x m °'.' ° 3 ~ ~ v~ Q oa C d o o` ~ n N . N W O O = L C c N 7 m ' N O L O O O L~ p p~ O - >. < V i O ~ N O N y V N (0 C U C N ? .~ ~ .N 3 (C CD N N W O E 01 L O. ~ O r (~ j C r E C H O ' "O C L U d ~ ~ N a N N A r O d .N ri r O ~ m r r O) F N C C 47 U N m h r 'O . N r U O d O. .. _. . . N C y N O C C N V N « L L O y C C d ` C ~ ° ~N ~ c O O ad D U U~ 3 L « ~~ m O y C « ~ !~ E a + U •V C E C m N E C N C m N N N m d C m N 'V E 0 'V 9 m N «• C m ` L W ~ ° in ~i ~ m F $ m 3 V F Fa U ¢U U --ii ° F Qii m U F ~ m U C N C N ~ L V ~~ ' ~.~ ' ~ m U N o C O ~ O .J o m~°> L~ V 2 .L-. C ~ T L W O ~O C V •.- C ° ~ V N V ~ N f0 ~ N d ~ C a O O °) N U U d y ~° E n rn ~- ~ '= ~ vi ~ v v ~ ~ o m m > ~ ~ c d , U m ~ d 'o c c o m v `; ` T O D O N C N C L °~ N p ~ N N C ~ .~. O C - = w O" E 'N J N N N N N ~ 01 y y m ° . C ~ E a~ or am ~ o.m ~ m 2 ° m m ~ E m a y ~ ° T N~ Y p o n mN m n y E v ~ ~ m E ~ :? a y m v °~ a~ ~ ~ ~ -o d ` N C ~~~ Ol 'S ~ (Cp O D 3 O V N N y N C ~ N m m ; d ° ° m . .° m ~' o ° ° a~ C m N C O) ~ O p E m N C C ~ U 3 d o m ° 3 ~~ ~ " d~ m E m ° N d T m ° N ~° m U N O a i c N l0 C m N O E O O O O) C N C U C ~? O~ y J Q 7 Q N N N d O U N . C N` . E l m °i C U N d ~ N E C -O ~ •~ C C 2 ~ C A N ~ ~ C N N N ~ ' ~ E~j ~ >:~ 3 i,a~ O) ~° E ' ~ ~ m ~ c ~ c c m O c m m ~ m m m o m o ~ ° t°~ ~~ m m ° a d ' ~ ~ d o d v v ~ wci ~ in ~ ci ° 3 ~ ci Ea r°- F= ~ c' r z z a d O V d C d t C d 01 C l0 s V Y d O U C y .~ d t C .y t P364 O rn K .` r R N d C t0 t U Y Y y W > L O) tdn >~ C Q ~ L U d - dd ' i N .N c Z ~ 7 Z` N d d d ~ ~ a 3 o_' a D ~ .= J c Q c d E ~ - J d m~ c ~ C N~a,N ° a~i o ~ ao° yEo'cE ~m ic N°a d-O c E ~ n m ~ rn~ d c n J E m ?~ d m E o w E ~ ~~ m c c °: c m E c d o d ~ ~ 'co ' o d v -dE m a v c p n ~ o> y o n ~p c o c > m- m v d d Q ~ ~ ~ J E d .` N O d ~ ~ N ~ .C C L ~ m ~ ~ -O m d d 3 n C C d O N . ~ 7 N~ c . ... C m J N d ~O v F C 9 N- m ' a N O d d - d m "O 'U m _ O T C ~ ~ C d C N N m m d O CL.. ~ ~ ~ m ' L-. C `-° d Y N ~ 'O >. n d ' ~ 'O a > d E y O ~O c ~ ~'~ c v ~ o N 7 ~ am v. a > v d m m n o a ' m " N a~ ` °- m m Q ~~ m y c~ Y d ° y m d m ~ m c o o- d '~ L w~ E d m d m rn c J c ~ d m c w E c.i m c a N d c > d m' d in n y d N y ~ ~ ~ c L . o ~L C o~ N V d 0 'r y m m 0 C7 _ C V m C C U 4 y c o o m m : 5 .' " O 3 m O m o > ~ v, ~ ~ ' ~ ~ a d m o- ~ ' $~ m o y m ~ ~ -o c ~ Q L y m N ~ o V a ~ o > m U o m y m d c w ~ a y w ~ o m w ` o a y c w o a ; o N m N a '- o c > 'E m o E E o. d c ~ ~' y d a n m c E °' d L m o o 5 j L p H d v= d ~ o v p 7 y >' ~ C ~ U ` C . y N N d ~ L d U N . .. C 0/ C L m a i U C J ~ d d ~ 'O ~ 0 d G d ~ d C ~ C n O ~ C m ~ O L C m ' y U L C il ~ (w 3 o d E ~ d m m 0 N ~ d C M m N d C L d o d U C a C N "' -O ` n c d > N L U o o m ~ ~ O d n m > L' d d U~ d_ m ~ °' i E m J o d 'O x ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~° `m aci .. ~ U m o m > 3~ N -O ~-o `m v O. N~ d a i F .d.. d U c0 N J a ~~ ~ ~ N m d (~ L C O o N d l: m w ~ L ._ d O ' p_ c d L N m m N ~ ~ '-' ~ . ~.. C ~ ~ C C m p m p C J d d E U m C d C O y ~ L U U ~ o ~ E o .E = ~o ~ ao N~ d in a c°~ o n m o r °' ~ °~ G o v ° N o N -o o U c 'N N m 3 ~ ~ ~ d d o w ~ ° U s ~ c m ~ N m ~ L m y ~ vi c > c o .N _ ~ > ~ axi ~ d m ~ c -o a i c~ L ~ y r ~ n E ~ ' i o c ~ °3 n o. o d i ~ a ~ n -o n N ~ °: m n Y d d rn o y c ~ r m n U m~ m ~ V d ~ m L o ~ m -o E m >, a ~ m $ E v N .add ~ m c m _C y C 7 .+ V~ ~ d N ." V y O U C o m .d. U N C O w d G~ 0 r V C C U W L N .O O m N N N N D L an d d n~ N d U 9 U n m 'O E t n 0/ C N L~ C C F- U !a L U L y F- X m W - O .• + L ~ 3 V L ~ d Q - L j -O w0 L V n y a = L ~ > L d J N O y N L ~ 0 d m J O H O H U m N . J ~ N H O~ f V F ~ ( ~ U ~ T m 3 w l4 C N m N ~ O E 9 J a y ~ U ai ~ a i ~ ~ m ~ o m ,~ v; p n d '~ O U m rn m m -O d ~ d na d c d ~ C m ~ C E d d 'x y d ~ m L y f`') ~ C m C m ~ (p U w O ~ N N ~ U ~ n O- N d N ' E J ~ d m m ~ O m E O m r ~~ L m E C ~ y ~ ~ N y ~ -O N 9 N o n _ ~ C m m ~ `m a i E ~ ~ y m m ~ ~ _ m X 9 m N J y ~ C C J m m , ~ -do ~ ~ rn U c E o . 0 0 ~ 'm O 0 N to - N d ~ m ~ N ~ d ~ J a ~ 7 ~ c m N C d > 0) d ~ ~ m m y ~ U C U C ~ C m L L '] 3 i m a C N n n U ' O O ~ N O) C~ O 01 X O `~ 'd "d D1 O) C y d 0 d N °-~ d U -° 0 o 0 o y and w•O N om N a o ~ o U U .o n i a v~ m U 'o o f c E o ~ m c ~ ~. d U L d ~ ~ v ~ v~ ~ d L~ d N d ~ U U U~ O U d U U d ' O `~ a d N d N O ~i m L r U ~ ~ L I- L F- L F w ~ !L- v~ FL- N d V d C d L_ C_ N d t V T d Y d U ~. H .~ d d L_ C .y t P365 O 0 L •+ CR G N d !0 t U m i m v n c = c m d L o •~ o o mN (J ~ ~'>, m n m c y N ~ 9 ~ a E ~ C N 3 U N~ U a y ~~ 0 c 9 0 ~ C7m ~y omm ~ n c a N w O U m~ v n m w axi 0 v~ ~ mU m v ~ o ' - n x c ~ m v `o o o °m y 0 0 E o - m ~ ~ o -o ~ m ~ '~ m o° U ,n 3 a~ N 'y ~ ~ x y ~ ov mo O m~OO c c a m E - m ~ C c v o m N~ ~ ~_ C ~ 7 Y C o ~ 'C m N J j Q X C N N ~ ~+ ~ ~> N N me c m m c°'o c N O w ~~ ~ N N O N O N d N (0 d ~ d N N y ` >_ m L j C ~ C ~ N 'O C Q C N _ N fA ~ ~ y C~ p 0 ~ O ~ 'O ~ m 0 O y U C 10 _ U C d t0 ~ r d 'O N' ~ C 7 m p ~ w ~ ~ O n E ~ O d aL. CJ 'y ~ m ~ -o m ~ w a C w N~ r L m C J U r N N rn `. 'N C ~ ~ m N m m N N m v w 'O d N O~ ~ '~ L iim U L D y~ F(7 cfn L V L O F E m d o ~d ~~ ~ ~ ~ m aXi o o - 0 - ~ ~ U c c ~ `m ~ d d o E -o v m ~ ~ U Y Y ~O m c m y ~ m ~ m ~ w a c > > m d ~ w w w ~ w rn m N N m C C ~ N y d N ~ w W m w+ ~ E E f0 ~ o N tq aL y 3 y c o c 0 ~ ° o ~ a ~i N C ~ • N N O O U N y O y ._ . -O 7 ~ ` N C O :: C O :~ N C y O O U L U w v w v U~ m ~ c y N m c c d ~ y in ' d d 7 U O N 7 7 U L ~ U U N U> N N N FL- 3~ ii ' ~ H d O V d C d L_ C_ N d f0 L V d Y d V 01 C H .X d d Z C .y w t ~~ P366 O P367 Land Use Table Translation Current Land Use Description New Land Use Descri tion Sin le-Famil Detached Dwellin ,Sin le-Famil Sin le-Famil Attached du-, tri- and four- lex Dwellin , 2 Famil Multi le Famil Dwellin s Dwellin ,Multi-Famil Mobile Home Parks Mobile Home Park Animal Care Facili Veterina Facilit Cemete Cemete /Mausoleum Church Assembl Use Club, Lod e, Fraterni 8 Sorori Assembl Use Colle a or Universi School, Colle e, Universi Public/Private Convalescent Center Medical Services, Extended Care Public Facilit Communit Center/Civic Use Da Care Facili Accesso - 6 or less Famil Da Care Home, Small Da Care Facili Non-Accesso - 7 or more Famil Da Care Home, Lar e Fire & Police Station Public Safet Facilit Hos ital Medical Services, Hos itals Outdoor Recreation Facili non-commercial Resource Related Recreation Public Park and Pla round Park and Public Plaza Residential Care Facilit Accesso - 6 or less Residential Care Home Residential Care Facility Non-Accessory - 7 or more Residential Care Facility Schools, Private & Parochial School, Academic, Private Stable, Commercial E uestrian Facilit ,Commercial Stable, Private E uestrian Facili , Hobb Utility or Service Facility Utility Facility and Infrastructure -fixed base structure Caretaker's Residence Caretaker Housin Guest House Guest House Second Dwellin Unit includin elder cotta a Dwellin ,Second Unit Feed & Tack Store (if accessory to commercial stable Equestrian Facility, Commercial Dormito if accesso to colle a or school • Current Land Use Description School, Colle e, Universit Public/Private New Land Use Descri tion Administrative and executive offices. Office Business and Professional Artist and photographic studios, not including the sale of a ui ment or su lies. Art, Antique and Collectable Shop Clerical and rofessional offices. Office Business and Professional Financial services and institutions, including drive- throw h banks. Banks and Financial Services Medical, dental, and related health services (non- animal related), including laboratories and clinics; only the sale of articles clearly incidental to the services rovided shall be ermitted. Medical Services -General Prescription pharmacies, (also when located within a building containing the offices of 5 or more medical ractitioners Retail, General Retail, Accessory Public buildings (city and county buildings, special districts, and ost office . Commercial Center/Civic Use Public utilit service offices. Office Business and Professional Public safety facility (police, fire, ambulance and aramedics . public Safety Facility EXHIBIT B , of6 P368 Land Use Table Translation Current Land Use Description New Land Use Descri tion Related commercial uses (blueprinting, stationary, quick copy, etc.) when incidental to an office building Accessory Retail, Business Supply Services or com lex. Anti ue sho s. Art, Anti ue and Collectable Sho Animal Care Facility (animal hospital, veterinarian, commercial kennel, roomin Veterinary Facility, Animal Sales 8 Grooming A are) stores. General Retail Art, music, and photographic studios and supply stores. General Retail A liance stores and re air. Furniture, Furnishin and A liances Arcades (see special requirements per Section 17.10.030 F. . Indoor AmusemenUEntertainment Facility Large/Small Athletic and Health Club, gyms, and weight reducing clinics. Indoor Fitness and Sport Facility/Personal Services Automotive sales and services (including motorc cles, boats, trailers, and cam ers quto and Vehicle Sales and Rental Automotive Services -Sales. Auto and Vehicle Sales and Rental Automotive Services -Rentals. Auto and Vehicle Sales and Rental Automotive Services -Repairs (major engine work, muffler shops, painting, body work, and upholstery). Vehicle Services -Major Automotive Services -Coin-o washin Car Washin and Detailin Automotive Services -Automatic washin Car Washin and Detailin Service or gasoline dispensing stations (including minor repair such as tune-ups, brakes, batteries, Service StationsNehicle Services -Minor tires, mufflers . Automotive Services -Parts and su lies. Auto Parts Sales Automotive Services -Tire sales and service (no outdoor stora e . Vehicle Services -Minor Bakeries retail onl Restaurant - No li uor service Barber and beaut sho s. Personal Services Bic cle sho s. General Retail Blue rint and hotoco services. Business Su ort Services Book, gift and stationary stores (other than adult related material . General Retail Cand Stores and Confectionaries Restaurant - No li uor service Caterin establishments. Restaurant - No li uor service Cleanin and ressin establishments. Personal Services Car enter sho or cabinet sho General Retail Cocktail lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment operated independent of a Bar/Nightclub restaurant. Cocktail lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment accesso to a restaurant. Restaurant -Full liquor Commercial recreation facilities. Indoor Amusement EntertainmenUlndoor Sports and Fitness/ Outdoor Commercial Recreation Commercial recreation facilities -Indoor uses such Indoor Amusement EntertainmenUlndoor Sports and as bowlin ,theaters, billiards, etc. Fitness/ Outdoor Commercial Recreation Commercial recreation facilities -Outdoor uses such Indoor Amusement EntertainmenUlndoor Sports and as golf, tennis, basketball, baseball, trampolines, etc. Fitness) Outdoor Commercial Recreation Dai roduct stores. General Retail 2 of 8 P369 Land Use Table Translation Current Land Use Descri tion New Land Use Description Delicatessens. Restaurant - No li uor service De artment stores. General Retail Drive-in businesses, including theaters. (other than fast food restaurants . Drive-in and Drive-thru Sales and Services Dru stores and harmacies. General Retail E ui ment rental ards. E ui ment Sales and Rental Electronic goods (i.e. TV's, stereos, radios, VCR's) sales and service. General Retail Fast-food restaurants. Restaurant - No li uor service Feed/Tack stores. General Retail Florist sho s. General Retail Food stores and su ermarkets. Groce Store/Su ermarket Furniture stores, re air and u holste Furniture, Furnishin and A liances General retail stores. General Retail Hardware stores. General Retail Home improvement centers -Material stored and sold within enclosed buildin s. Home Improvement Supply Store Home improvement centers -Outdoor storage of material such as lumber and buildin materials. Home Improvement Supply Store Hotels and Motels. Hotel and Motel Janitorial services and su lies. Business Su ort ServiceslGeneral Retail Jewel stores. General Retail Laund self-service. Personal Services Li uor stores. Li uor Store Locksmith sho General Retail Massa a establishments. Massa a Establishment Mortuaries and cemeteries. Cemete (Mausoleum Music, dance, and martial arts studio. Indoor Fitness and S orts Facili News a er and ma azine stores. General Retail Nurseries and garden supply stores; provided, in the NC district, all equipment, supplies and material are kept within an enclosed area, and provided that fertilizer is stored in packaged form only. Garden Center/Plant Nursery Office and business machine stores. General Retail Office su I stores. General Retail Parking facilities (commercial) where fees are char ed. parking Facility Pawn sho s. Pawn Sho Pet sho Animal Sales and Groomin Political or hilanthro is head uarters. Office Business and Professional Plumbin sho and su lies. General Retail Photoco Business Su ort Services Printin sho s. Business Su ort Services Restaurants (other than fast food) -with entertainment and/or cocktail loun a and bar. Restaurant -Full liquor Restaurants (other than fast food) -incidental serving of beer and wine but without a cocktail loun e, bar, entertainment, or dancin . Restaurant -Beer and Wine Shoe stores, sales and re air. General Retail Second-hand store. Consi nment Store S iritualist readin s or astrolo forecastin Personal Services 3 of 8 P370 Land Use Table Translation Current Land Use Descri tion New Land Use Descri tion S ortin oods stores. General Retail Stam and coin sho s. Art, Anti ue and Collectable Sho Swimmin ool su lies. General Retail Tailor. Personal Services Taxidermists. Animal Sales and Groomin Thrift store. Thrift Store To stores. General Retail Travel a encies. Office Business and Professional Transportation facilities (train and bus, taxi depots). Transit Facility Truck and trailer rental, sales and service. Auto and Vehicle Sales and Rental Varie stores. General Retail Da Care Facilities. Child Da Care Facili /Center Convalescent facilities. Medical Services -Extended Care Hos itals. Medical Services -Hos itals Private and public clubs and lodges, including YMCA, YWCA, and similar outh rou uses. Assembly Uses, Indoor Fitness and Sports Facilities Educational institutions, parochial, private (including colle es and universities . School, Academic (PubliclPrivate), School, College Libraries & museums, ublic or rivate. Libra and Museum Parks and recreation facilities, ublic or rivate. Outdoor Communi Recreation/Park, Public Plaza Public utili installations. Utilit Facili and Infrastructure -fixed base Vocational or business trade schools. Schools, S ecialized Education and Trainin Churches, convents, monasteries, and other reli ious institutions. Assembly Uses Emer enc Shelters Emer enc Shelter Caretakers residence. .. :. Current Land Use Descri tion Caretaker Housin New Land Use Description Anti ue Sho s Art, Anti ue, and Collectible A arel - Bouti ues General Retail A arel -General General Retail A liance Stores and Re air Furniture, Furnishin , and A liance Art, Music, Photographic Studios, and Supply Stores General Retail Auto Service Station Service Stations Auto Service -Sales (with ancillary repair facilities) Auto and Vehicle Sales and Rental Auto Service -Rentals Auto and Vehicle Sales and Rental Auto Service Minor Repair (does not include major engine work, muffler shops, painting, body work, upholstery, etc. Vehicle Services -Minor Auto Service -Coin-o Washin Car Washin and Detailin Auto Service -Automatic Washin Car Washin and Detailin Auto Service -Parts and Su lies Auto Parts and Sales Bakeries retail onl Restaurant - No Li uor Service Barber and Beau Sho s Personal Services Bed and Breakfast Bed and Breakfast Bic cle Sho s General Retail Blue rint and Photoco Services Business Su ort Services 4 of 8 P371 Land Use Table Translation Current Land Use Descri tion New Land Use Descri tion Book, Gift, and Stationery Stores other than adult related material General Retail Cand and Confectionaries Restaurant - No Li uor Service Caterin Establishments Restaurant - No Li uor Service China and Glassware Stores General Retail Churches Assembl Uses Cleanin and Pressin Establishments Personal Services Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge tavern) including related entertainment gar/Nightclub Commercial Recreational: a Indoor uses such as bowlin and billiards Indoor Amusement/Eating Facility, Large and Small Commercial Recreational: b Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball Outdoor Commercial Recreation Convalescent Facilities and Hos itals Medical Services -Extended Care Curtain and Dra a Sho s General Retail Da Care Centers Child Da Care Facili /Center Delicatessens and S ecialt Food Stores S ecialt Food Store Drug Stores and Pharmacies: a Over 10,000 s uare feet General Retail Drug Stores and Pharmacies: (b) Pharmacies with or without specialty retail under 10,000 s uare feet General Retail Electronic Sales and Service TV's, Stereos, Radios, Com uters General Retail Educational Services: a Parochial, Private, Colle es, Universities School, Academic, PrivatelSchool, College/University Educational Services: (b) Instruction, Tutoring, Counseling, Testing, Trainin Schools and Facilities Tutoring Center, Small/Large Educational Services: (c) Vocational, Technical, Trade, Business and Professional Schools School, Specialized Education and Training/Studio Floor Coverin Sho s General Retail Florist Sho s General Retail Furniture Stores Furniture, Furnishin , and A liance Hardware Stores General Retail Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility Small/Large Hobb Sho s General Retail Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains Restaurant - No Li uor Service Janitorial Services and Su lies Business Su ort Services Jewel Stores General Retail Laund Self Service Personal Services Leather Goods and Lu a e Stores General Retail Libraries and Museums, Public and Private Libra and Museum Li uor Stores Li uor Store Messen er and Wire Services Business Su ort Services Mixed Use Public Stora a Stora e, Personal Stora a Facilit Mortuaries and Cemeteries Cemete /Mausoleum Music, Dance, and Martial Arts Studios Indoor Fitness and S orts Facili Small/Lar e News a er and Ma azine Stores General Retail 5 of 8 P372 Land Use Table Translation Current Land Use Descri tion New Land Use Descri tion Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores Within Enclosed Area Garden CenterlPlant Nursery Office, Business Machine and Computer Component General Retail Stores Office Su I Stores General Retail Paint, Glass, and Wall a er Stores General Retail Parking Facilities (Commercial where fees are char ed Parking Facility Parks and Recreation Facilities, Public and Private Outdoor Commercial Recreation/Park Public Plaza Pet Sho s Animal Sales and Groomin Photoco Xerox Business Su ort Services Political or Philanthro is Head uarters Office, Business, and Professional Public and Private Clubs and Lodges, including YMCA, YWCA, and similar Youth Grou Uses Assembly Uses/Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility Record and Ta a Stores General Retail Recreational Vehicle Stora a Yards Recreational Vehicle Stora e Restaurants (sit down): a With entertainment and/or cocktail loun e, bar Restaurant -Full Liquor Service Restaurants (sit down): (b) Incidental serving of beer and wine (without a Restaurant -Beer and Wine cocktail loun e, bar, entertainment or dancin Restaurants (sit down): (c) cafe, limited to 20 seats (including outdoor Restaurant - No Liquor Service seatin Restaurants (fast food): d With drive-thru Restaurant - No Liquor Service/Drive Thru Restaurants (fast food): d W ithout drive-thru Restaurant - No Liquor ServicelDrive Thru Shoe Stores and Re air Sho s General Retail S ecial Retail General Retail Sporting Goods Stores: (a) Specialty; Backpacking, Tennis, Skiing, General Retail Mountaineerin , Fishin ,etc. Sporting Goods Stores: (b) General; Encompassing a variety of sports General Retail e ui ment Su ermarkets Groce StorelSu ermarket Swimmin Pool Services and Su lies General Retail Tailor Sho s Personal Services To Stores General Retail Variety Department Stores, Junior Department Stores General Retail Veterinary (domestic): a Non-boardin Veterinary Facility Veterinary (domestic): b Boardin Veterinary Facility Watch and Clock Re air Stores General Retail Yarda a Goods Stores General Retail Arcades Indoor AmusemenUEntertainment Facilit Cultural Artist Exhibits: a Indoor Galle and Art Sales Art, Antique, Collectible Shop 6 of 8 P373 Land Use Table Translation Current Land Use Descri tion New Land Use Description Discothe ues Bar/Ni htclub Theaters: a Dinner Theater Restaurant -Beer and Wine/Restaurant --Full Liquor Service Theaters: b Movie Theater includin Multi lex Theaters and Auditoriums Banks, Finance Services and Institutions, Including Drive-Thru Banks and Financial Services Business and Office Services Business Su ort Services Interior Decoratin Firms Office, Business, and Professional Medical/Dental Offices and Related Health Clinics Medical Services -General O titian and O tometrist Sho s Medical Services -General Realtors and Real Estate Offices Office, Business, and Professional Travel A encies Office, Business, and Professional Transit Facilities Transit Facilit Public Utili Installations Utilit Facili and Infrastructure -fixed based Sin le-Famil Detached Dwellin ,Sin le-Famil Sin le-Famil Attached du lex, tri lex, four lex Dwellin ,Two-Famll Multi-Famil Dwellin s Dwellin ,Multi-Famil Ancillary Residential Uses: Home-Care Facilities (6 or less Residential Care Home HotellMotel Hotel and Motel Hotel Facilities ma'or Current Land Use Descri tion Hotel and Motel New Land Use Descri tion Custom Manufacturin Manufacturin ,Custom Li ht Manufacturin Manufacturin , Li ht Medium Manufacturin Manufacturin ,Medium Hea Manufacturin Manufacturin ,Hea Minimum Im act Hea Manufacturin Manufacturin ,Minimum Im act Heav Industrial Administrative & Office Office Business and Professional/Accesso Office Professional/Desi n Services Office Business and Professional/Accesso Office Research Services Research and Develo ment Public Stora a Stora e, Personal Stora a Facilit Li ht Wholesale, Stora e & Distribution Wholesale Stora a and Distribution - Li ht Medium Wholesale, Stora e & Distribution Wholesale Stora a and Distribution -Medium Heav Wholesale, Stora e & Distribution Wholesale Stora a and Distribution -Hea Materials Recovery Facilities -Collection Facilities Recycling Facility -Collection Materials Recovery Facilities -Processing Facilities Recycling Facility -Processing Materials Recove Facilities -Scra O eration Rec clin Facili -Scra and Dismantlin Administrative Civic Services Communi Center/Civic Use Convention Centers Convention Center Cultural Libra and Museum/Theatre and Auditorium Da Care Facili Child Da Care Facili /Center Emer enc Shelter " Emer enc Shelter Extensive Impact Utility Facilities Utility Facility and Infrastructure -Fixed base facilities Public Assembt Assembl Uses/Outdoor Commercial Recreation Public Safety & Utility Services Public Safety Facility/Utility Facility and Infrastructure - Fixed base 7of8 Land Use Table Translation Current Land Use Description New Land Use Descri tion Reli ious Assembl Assembl Uses Schools Schools, Academic (Private), (Public), School, College and Universi PubliGPrivate Adult Entertainment Adult Oriented Business A ricultural/Nurse Su lies & Services Garden Center/Plant Nurse Animal Care Veterina Facilit Automotive Fleet Stora a Auto and Vehicle Stora e Automotive Fuelin Services Service Stations Automotive Rental Automotive and Vehicle Sales and Rental Automotive/Li ht Truck Re air- Minor Vehicle Services, Minor Automotive/Truck Re air - Major Vehicle Services, Major Automotive Sales and Leasin Automotive and Vehicle Sales and Rental Automotive Service Court Vehicle Service, Minor/Vehicle Service, Major/Service Stations Automotive Service Station Service Stations Buildin Contractor's Office & Yards Stora a Yard/Ancilla Office Buildin Contractor's Stora a Yard Stora a Yard/Ancilla Offce Buildin Maintenance Services Business Su ort Services Buildin & Li ht E ui ment Su Ties & Sales Maintenance and Re air, Small E ui ment Business Su I Retail & Services Business Su ort Services Business Su ort Services Business Su ort Services Communication Services Broadcastin and Recordin Studios Convenience Sales & Services Retail, Accesso Cremato Services Cremato Services Extensive Impact Commercial Theatres and AuditoriumslDrive in 8 Drive Through Sales Fast Food Sales Restaurant, No Li uor Service Financial, Insurance & Real Estate Services Office Business and Professional Food 8 Bevera a Sales Convenience Store, Li uor Store Heav E ui ment Sales & Rentals E ui ment Sales & Rental Hotel/Motel Hotel and Motel Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial Retail, General, Retail Warehouse Club Laund Services Wholesale Stora a and Distribution, Li ht Medical/Health Care Services Medical Services, Extended Care, General, Hos ital Personal Services Schools, S ecial Education and Trainin Petroleum Products Stora a Fuel Stora a and Distribution Recreation Facilities Indoor Fitness and S orts Facili -Small and Lar e Re air Services Manufacturin ,Custom Restaurants Restaurant, No Li uor Restaurants with Bar or Entertainment Restaurant, Beer and Wine, Full Li uor S ecialt Buildin Su lies & Home Im rovement Home Im rovement Su I Store Warehouse-S le Retail Merchandisin Retail, Warehouse Club P374 8 of 8 P375 NEW LAND USES IN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT La it ~ _ ~ ~ ~a +~ ,~~ Y`~i ~ z _' - Use/Zohin j J ~-- -~- ~ x ~ ~a ~ ~Z i~~ jV ~~ a V 3 'a ~ x S p =- LL j g _ ~ 0 ~ 1 ~ ' a~ v i ~ ~ C7~ ~ ~ ~ : , D~stnct ~ ~ ~ ~ R }I~Us ~ - ` ' es~dentia es ~. L~s_ - ; .- ~ -- - - __ Emergency N N N N N N N N N C N N N N C N N N N N N Shelter Group C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N C N N Residential Live-Work N N N N N N P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Manufactured p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home Mobile Home C C C C C' C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Park Single-Room Occupancy N N N P P P P N N N N N N N N N tJ N N N N Facility Transitional p p p p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Housing ~Recreation,,Reso urce Pre s~r - v_ati on, Ope - - n,S ~ pace '!E_d uca _ r _tion andi~P _~; ubb ` - As sem bly Us es = _ Tutoring Center - N N N N N N C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N .Large Tutoring Center - N N N N N N P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Small . Utl mw},pi mwzwuul~udz~k~wwr~rv a „Iity~Transporta 9ww~ t~on , Pu ~ bhc " ~Fa cilrt e . y,yan : d~C . om ~ .~ mum cat iond r.,~ iuzriiMii r,} Uses'~~„ _. ~ _ -- _ Broadcasting and Recording N N N N N N N P N P N N N P P N N N N N N Studios Utility Facility and Infrastructure- N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C C C N C C Fixed Based Structures Utility Facility and Infrastructure- P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Pipelines Reta~l Se i e an ~O e 4Us es ~ ~ , ,, rv w c , ~ . ~ ~ ; _ _ _ _ _ Call Centers N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N N N Card Room N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Check Cashing N N N N N N P N P P N N N -P N N N N N N N Business Gun Sales N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N Hookah Shop N N N N N N C N N C N N N N N N N N N N N E/~I II~I~ P376 Lana;. Use/Zoning ~ ~ _ ~ x~ ~ x o ~o_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Mme, ~ a ~ C7 x ~ ~- ex ~ v ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~t7 cv ~~ y O s a ~ x~ District ~ ~ . _~ Internet Cafe N N N N N N P P P P P P N P N N N N N N N Pawnshop N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N Secondhand N N N N N N P N P P N N N N N N N N N N N Dealer Shooting Range N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N Smoke Shop N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N N N N N N Tattoo Shop N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N N N N N N A p'Mm tle~ RRW utomobile and V ~ ehi cle U ses - ~ ~ ~ "~ ~;'~µ~~~ ~ ~i4~~~4 ~ i~ •~- ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ -~ ~,~ ~, . _ h Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N P P P P P N P N N N N N N N Autobroker Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N P P P P P N P P N N N N N N Sales, Wholesale P377 Thomas Winery Plaza Property Owner, LLC 7945 Vineyard Avenue, Suite D-5 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 phone 805.604.2640 jaz 805.604.2641 Apri118, 2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Director 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Thomas Winery Plaza ("TWP") -Comments to Proposed New Development Code Deaz City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Director, We are in receipt of the Proposed New Development Code ("New Code" or "Proposed Code") released to the public on April 5, 2012. We have reviewed Proposed Code and have some serious concerns about the uses that will.be allowed in TWP; we feel the uses aze too restrictive and will impede business, progress and the overall health of the City. Recently, after meeting with Candyce Burnett and other City Planning Staff, we aze hopeful that some adjustments can be made to the New Code that would promote more even and fair competition, inclusion of compatible business uses, and a development code that is less restrictive than the current code. There seemed to be agreement that the intention of the New Code was to be less restrictive and promote more uses; a helpful sentiment in the post-recession environment we live in today. We respectfully offer the following comments for your review and consideration. TR'P is "SPECIAL" wITH A ZONING OF SPECIATLY RETAIL TWP is home to a historical building, the Thomas Brothers Winery, which comprises approximately 10% of the rental space at TWP. The historical building is suaounded by structures built in the mid to late 1980's; these structures are similar in nature to our adjacent and neazby neighbors. Our zoning of Specialty Retail is only used on two sites in the city, and unfortunately our entire shopping center is zoned Specialty Retail, instead of just the parcel with the historical building. This zoning designation has been restrictive and an impediment to business and fair competition between TWP and our neighbors. We have had several meetings with City Staff and City Councilmen that have agreed the cuaent zoning is too restrictive. EXHIBIT D P378 There was discussion that the Specialty Retail zoning designation may be removed from the code; when it survived, there was discussion that additional uses would be allowed and there would be no uses removed -effectively easing the restrictions that have impaired competition and business. The New Code keeps TWP as "special" with a zoning of Specialty Commercial. While we understand and support the spirit of our "special" status, we believe there are oversights and omissions that have actually made the New Code more restrictive. We hope this was unintended and can be corrected quickly. In the spirit of the special zoning, we suggest the city allow any marginal uses (uses that would be appropriate in the 1980's structures, and maybe not appropriate in the historical buiiding) with a Conditional Use Permit ("CUP"). By controlling the CUP approval process, the City will still have some protection of the use of the historical building and still be able to allow these uses in the newer buildings. If uses aze prohibited by the code, there is no room for City Staff to allow a business with a mazginal use to fit into TWP. USES UNDER THE NEW CODE Our review of the New Code has resulted in four categories of concern over uses; a list of the uses is attached to this letter as an exhibit, with a short description of the four categories below. Section A -Previously aaaroved Uses, not allowed Section A of the exhibit lists all uses that aze currently allowed under existing code, and appeaz to be prohibited under the New Code. Many of these uses are necessary in order for TWP to compete with neighboring properties and the implementation of the New Code, as proposed, would have a crippling effect on TWP. We request these uses be expressly allowed in TWP. Section B -Previously aaaroved Uses, we cannot fmd in the New Code Section B of the exhibit lists all uses that are currently allowed under existing code, and we cannot find a similaz use in the New Code. We found the existing code table to be more specific with regard to uses than the New Code. We would like clarification as to where these uses fall under the New Code and confirm that these uses aze allowed at TWP. Implementation of the New Code as proposed would cause confusion and a challenge to identifying which businesses could be allowed in TWP. We request these uses be allowed in TWP. P379 Section C -New Uses, not areviously defined. that should be allowed Section C of the exhibit lists all uses that were not defined under existing code, and appeaz to be prohibited under the New Code. These uses are allowed in other retail centers in the City and aze complementary to our center, and should be allowed in order to provide a competitive environment. We request these uses be allowed in TWP. Final Section -Previously aaaroved Uses that aaaear to be allowed The Final Section of the exhibit lists all uses that are currently allowed under existing code, and appear to be allowed under the New Code. The list shows the current description of use, followed by the New Code description of use that is allowed at TWP. We would greatly appreciate City Staff confirming that these uses will be allowed under the New Code. We hope this information will be an integral part of our joint efforts to enact a New Code that is healthy for the City, its residents, and its businesses. We would like to sit down with staff soon to discuss changes necessazy to the New Code. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROPERTY OWNER, LLC Michael D. Chesser Manager MDCss Encl: CC: John Gillison, City Manger Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner P380 ' List of Uses Section A Previously approved Uses thaf are not allowed under new development code: (Current code descriptions) 1. Bed and Breakfast (CUP) 2. China and Glassware Stores-new category of Furniture, Famishing and Appliance Store 3. Educational Services- Tutoring 4. Farmers' Market 5. Furniture Stores-including repair 6. Liquor Stores 7. Specialty Retail 8. Veterinary (domestic)-Non-boazding 9. Veterinary (domestic)-Boarding 10. Theaters: Dinner Theater ('T'heater and Auditorium is not allowed under new code) 11. Administrative, Business and Professional Offices 12. Realtors and Real Estate Offices 13. Travel Agencies 14. Banks, Finance Services and institutions, including drive-thru (drive thru is not perautted under new code) Section B Previously approved Uses that we cannot trace to new development code: 1. Bicycle Shops 2. Candy and Confectioneries 3. Catering Establishments 4. Cleaning and Pressing Establishments 5. Delicatessens and Specialty Food Store 6. Record and Tape Stores 7. Toy Stores 8. Watch and Clock Repair Stores 9. Cultural Artist Exhibits: Outdoor Art Exhibits 10. Interior Decorating Firms Section C New Uses under new development code that should be approved or CUP in order to be competitive: 1. Tutoring Centers 2. Business Support Services (e.g. mail box services, photocopying, notary, etc.) 3. Consignment Store 4. Convenience Store 5. Drive-In/Drive-Through Sales and Services--financial services. P381 6. Furniture, Famishing and Appliance Store 7. Internet Cafe 8. Liquor Store 9. Massage Establishment 10. Office, Business and Professional 11. Office, Accessory 12. Veterinary Facility List of Uses we traced to new development code Uses but we would like confirmation city agrees with our conclusion: (Current Use Description-New Use Description or Category) 1. Antique Shops -Art, Antique, Collectible Shop 2. Apparel-Boutique -Retail, Genera] 3. Apparel-General-Retail, General 4. Art, Music, Photographic Studios and Supply Stores-Retail, General 5. Bakeries (retail only) -Retail, General 6. Barber and Beauty Shops-Persona] Services 7. Book, Gift and Stationary Stores (other than adult~Retail, General 8. Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavem~Bar/Nightclub 9. Commercial Recreational-Indoor uses such as bowling and billiards -Indoor Fitness and Sports Facilities Lounge 10. Curtain and Drapery Shops-Retail, Genera] 11. Drug Stores and Pharmacies (Pharmacies with or without specialty retail under 10,000 sq. ft.-Retail, General 12. Florist Shop-Retail, General 13. Furniture Stores-Retail, General 14. Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics-Indoor Sports Facilities and Medical Genera] 15. Hobby Shops-Retail, General 16. Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains-Restaurant, Sit-Down, No Liquor Service 17. Jewelry Stores-Artisan Shop 18. Leather Goods and Luggage Stores-Retail, General 19. Music, Dance and Martial Arts Studios-Indoor Fitness and Sports Facilities 20. Newspaper and Magazine Stores-Retail, General 21. Pet Shops-Animal Sales and Grooming 22. Shoe Stores and Repair Shops-Persona] Services 23. Sporting Goods Stores-Retail, General 24. Tailor Shops-Personal Services 25. Variety Department Stores, Junior Department Stores-Retail, General 26. Arcades-Indoor AmusemenUEntertainment Facility 27. Cultural Artist Exhibits: Indoor Gallery and Art Sales-Art, Antique, Collectable Shop 28. Discotheques-Bar/Nightclub 29. Banks, Finance Services and institutions, including drive-thru-Banks and Financial Service P382 May 1, 2012 Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A 10500 Civic Center Drive PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: BIA BALDY VIEW CHAPTER GOMMENTSFOR NEW DEVELOPMENT.CODE Dear Ms. Daniels, ,' ' ~ ;a ~~~ ~~t>$ ~. r, Bally View CJJapter Ruildine~hidu5tn Assi!ciatinn ni Somham Caul nrnia. Ins:. 8711 Monroe Court, Suile,R Rancho Cucamonga; California 91730 ph 909.945.1884 fx 909.948.9631 wn~ntbiahuildcmn Thank you again for meeting with us on April 17'b to discuss the revisions of the new Development Code for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We respectfully request that you clarify the following questions-and comments in writing aTyour earliest convenience: Paee 17.16-4 D. #2. Home Occupation Permit Criteria -The sectioowas very broad and thus could be left to the subjective interpretation of staff. Generally speaking, we agree that each decision that the City makes is based on the Health, Safety, and N/elfare of its residents. However, we are unclear on how theterms "peace, morals, and comfort" apply to this section. Paee 17.20-5 #8 Preservation of existing topographic features -This goal is very subjective. While we believe it is important to preserve the natural environment surrounding a new development whenever possible, we hope to clarify what is expected andwhether it will result in any additional costs for future development. Paee 17.20-6 #15 Energy Conservation for Design Reviews - We are assuming the word "encourage" is not synonymous with the word "require"? We request that the City allow the consumer market to dictate which energy conservation techniques the homebuiltler offers in each community. Pace 17.20-8 #4 and #5 Design Review Process (Technical Review Committee and Grading Committee) -Does this section require the Design Review Committees occur just after the first submittal? Is the grading and technical review committee required on projectsthat have installed improvements in place or only in the ease where the plans for the grading and improvements are already approved by the City? Paee 17.24-2 D Overlay Zoning Districts - Can an Overlay Zoning District be applied to an existing Specific Plan without a SPA? ~~~ I ~ ~~ ~ ;ia~iun~oi"li nns nuilde~. :nib the i"a;ifnrni;i N:;ildinp hidiulry A<cnc iai~~n P383 Paee 17.36-2 Open Space Requirements- Do the open space percentages reflect the area on a typical residential lot on the space other than coverage by the home and surrounding appurtenances? Does this requirement reflect the percentage required on each individual lot rather than the project as a whole? Paee 17.36-2 Table 17.36.010-1 Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts - - Front Yard - Is the setback reduced if there is a side on garage condition? - Interior Side Yard-S'/S' (10' between buildings) should be the minimum setback on a SK foot lot - How is FAR calculated. If based on grdss building area divided by parcel area, the MH.and H districts are too restrictive. A 30 DUA project would have an average unit size of 726 SF. Paee 17.36-3 Table 17.36:010-1 continued Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts - We believe we need exhibits for the distance between building/structures to better understand how this table would be implemented. Paee 17.36-4 q5 Amenities -The item does not include the additiona6amenities required. Paee 17.48-2 A fti Materials and Maintenance/Wall Colors -Please clarify whether the builder is allowed to select the color and/or style of the interior side of the wall after meeting these requirements (i.e. precision interior walls orvinyl/wood behind the perimeter and return walls not visible from the ROW). Paee 17.48-3 B Graffiti Resistance - Is the graffiti resistant treatment intended for exterior walls only and not the interior side of the wall? Paee 17.50-2 1" Paraeraoh Green Building Code -Where is the Green Building Code Compliance Matrix located? Are there any additional requirements above and beyond the current California Green Building Code (CGBC) requirements? Will builders maintain the flexibility to select any options on the CGBC or does the city now have additional requirements. . Page 17.58-7 Fieure 17.58.060-2 Parking Lot Landscaping - fs the berm required or suggested? Paee 17.68-6 Table 17.68.050-1 Parking Requirements By Land Use -Why would 1 additional bedroom (3 to 4) increase parking requirement by .7 stalls. Is there a study that backs this up? Pace 17.80-1 A. 2. Special Development Criteria -The current and future technology of solar energy systems should not determine lot orientation for future projects. Use and lot alignments should be determined by the site not by the future use of solar. Likewise, it seems overly restrictive to record easements for solar that limit what a homeowner can do with their yard. P384 Paee 17.86-0 3.i. Smart Irrigation Controllers -Smart irrigation controllers should'be offered as an option to future homeowners rather than a requirement. Paee 17.110-6 K. 3. .Model Complex bonding - Is the model home bonding requirement to be determined on a project to project basis or is there a current standard bonding amount setby a resolution? Paee 17.110-7 tt12 Box Trees for Model Complexes - We are concernetl-that 48" box trees are too large considering the salescomplex is temporary and recommend that thisbe adjusted to 24"or 3fi". Paee 17.130-6 vi. and vii. Grading -The two requirements for minimum flatarea for driveways and its maximum slope maybe counterproductive. Thisshould be left to the California Building Code, Universal Building Code and lot specific grading conditions. The use of the proposed requirementsmay result in houses set back abnormally far. We are concerned that large grade breaks in the driveway that can damage low riding vehicles. 17.132-1 A. 1. iii. Single Family Home Designs -Due to the topography and other factors sometimes unique to each lot, the garage side yard setback of 10'-12' requirement may not be possible and should be reduced to 5' particularly for smaller lot sizes. .Paee 17.132-2 v. Varying FrontYard Setbacks - We would prefer nothave varying front yard setbacks as a requirement. It will be'very difficult to accomplish this on smallerlots. forexample, a 25' setback from PL and a varied setback requirement would still have fit issues. In this case, we would instead recommend a 20' setback from PL with a variance. Thahk you in advance for your consideration. We look forward to scheduling a meeting with you at your earliest convenience to discuss the responses to our aforementioned comments/questions. Sincerely, Carlos Rodriguez Chief Executive Officer i_ RANCxo CUCAMONGA May 10, 2012 Carlos Rodriguez BIA Baldy View Chapter 8711 Monroe Court, Suite B Rancho Cucamonga, GA 91730 P385 Mayor L. DENNIS h41cxA£t • Mavar ProTem. SAM SPAGNOLU CounrilMembea WILLLIM J. ALEXANDES2, CHUCK $UQUET, DIAN£ WILLIAMS Ciry Mnnag<rJDIIN R. GILLISON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: Response to Comments for the New Development Code Dear Mr. Rodriguez: We appreciate the time you took to review the new Development Code. In response to your letter dated May 1, 2012, we hope this letter will clarify the questions and issues you presented. Page 17.16-4 D. #2. We did review with our consultant the terms "peace, morals and comfort" and we all agreed this is outdated language. We will be recommending its removal as part of an addendum to the public draft document that will be heard by the Planning Commission on May 23, 2012. Page 17.20-5 #8 This statement explains one of the goals of the Design Review process. How this is implemented is reviewed on a project by project basis and is dependent on the location of the proposed development and existing site characteristics. Page 17.20-6 #15 The City is not proposing to require any specific energy conservation for design review entitlements; we prefer to encourage applicants to consider energy conservation in their design. Page 17.20-8 #4 and 5 A proposed project is only scheduled for committees (Design Review, Technical and Grading) once the application is deemed complete by the project planner. In the case of a Design Review entitlement, because these applications are proposing significant development, it is customary for the project to be reviewed by-all three committees. I OSUO Civic Center Dr. • EO. Box 807 • Ranchu Cucamonga, CA 91?29-0807 • Tel (9U9) 4?7-2700 • Fax (909) 4?7-2849 • www.CiryorRC.us 0 P386 Page 17.24-2 D A Special Planning Area is simply a term used to describe a variety of planning tools available for development (i.e. Specific Plan, Master Plan, Overlay District). This is more thoroughly described in Chapter 17.116. That said, an overlay district can be applied over an existing Specific Plan. Examples of this are our equestrian and hillside overlay districts, which are applied over two specific plans. Page 17.36-2 The open space requirement is the minimum percentage of open space on a parcel or project and is what currently exists in the-code today. Typically it is utilized on multi- family projects. We will review its compatibility on single family projects during a future annual code review. Page 17:36=3 Table 17.36.010-1 We will be adding new graphics to complement this table. Page 17.36-4 #5 We will be adding the required amenities to the code as they are currently required. Page 17.48-2 A#1 Interior wall color and style is at the discretion of the developer. Page 17.48-3 B Graffiti resistance is only required on the exterior walls, not interior sides of the wall. Page 17.50-2 The Green Building Code Compliance Matrix is currently under development and will be maintained and updated separately from the Development Code. We designed the Green Building Code to mirror the Tier 1 and Tier 2 standards of the California Green Building Code. We do not anticipate adding any unique requirements or options at this time. Page 17.58-7.Figure 17.58.060-2 The berm. shown in the figure is illustrative of one way to provide screening. Page 17.68-6 Table 17.68.050 Staff conducted a study of surrounding cities for multi-family parking requirements to determine the proposed increase in parking for 4 bedroom units. P387 Page 17.80-1 A. 2. This is existing language from the current code that has been added to our list of items for a future annual code review. Page 17.86-4 3.i. AB1881 and the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance require the implementation of smart irrigation technology. Page 17.110-6 K.3. We have a standard bond amount that was set by a fee resolution in 2004. Page 17.110-6 K.3. We are proposing reducing the box tree size for model complexes from 48" to 36" as part of an addendum to the public draft document that will be heard by the Planning Commission on May 23, 2012. Page 17;130-6 vi. and vii.. The grading requirements for driveways and driveway slope are current requirements from the existing code and are not being proposed for revision at this time. Page 17.132-1 A.1.iii. The standards for side yard setbacks and their orientation on a lot are current requirements from the existing code and are not being proposed for revision at this time. Page 17.132-2 v. The standards for side yard setbacks and their orientation on a lot are .current requirements from the existing code and are not being proposed for revision at this time. Thank you far giving us an opportunity to provide clarification and answer your questions. If you have any further questions, do not hesitate to contact me. ~r akamura a Planner P388 May 2, 2012 Honorable Council Members: Hand Delivery -May 2, 2012 Rancho Cucamonga City Hall ~?~¢dtz65S~a~i~ i1~'k:~¢t2e 3tt A."..p°t Z6Qt < C Atj~ ~~~~~~~~ We at Dedeaux Properties have been advised that there are city code changes proposed. We own-two sites in:Rancho Cucamonga. Namely, we own 10801 East Jersey and 9000 Rochester. We feel thatthese code changes specifically pazking and signage will detrimentally affect our business, the business climate.in Rancho Cucamonga, and eventuallythe city itself. In our opinion, the increase in required parking for industrial buildings needs further review.. Dart Warehouse and Dedeaux Properties operate wazehouse buildings across the country and we find that industrial vvarehouses need only minimal parking. In the city's opinion what is the average employment requirement for warehouse buildings? In addition to future construction;planning; the code would be retroactive to existing industrial buildings making a large portion of existing structures non-conforming. Should existing occupants in the city wishto change the physical structure of a building where would they find the parking? Next comment would be the new signage requirement. In a multi-tenantpark the occupants would need signage so visitors and transportation companies can find the correct company. How can this signage requirement be modified to allow properand needed identification? Please consider our questions and requests as'this planning forcode changes progress forwazd. Sincerely; ~~'~ ~ ~~ t'ti~~ James C. Moore 'Property Manager JCM:dj D~DEAUX PKf3PE&TIES, LLC EXHIBIT F 1130 So. Eashrtnn $cenue • Los :Angeles. C.4 90093 .(333} .987-&.433 ~ 'FA.~ (393) 368-a'SSI P389 ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ m m L C j C ~~ W O C ¢ o> ~.. H ~ 3 y $~ o ~ L o v y i %v m > ~ m 3 a~ a >,~'V c d L.L., uc onto ~w _ E ~ ` y vm` .~ 'L' O. oL o N 3 ao3 a m h~ O O ~ N ~ o ~ m a T m r o ~a > N = c v a m ~ d m ~ ° ~ ~ N G O O G i, y C m 0 N t' ~ m E ~ O V O 4 N '~ C p U a .y a °~' n. ~ r ~ ~ .° . o ~ ~ a O 3 C L p y 0 o ` ~ V N y Qj 'C m O > v O ~ N~'o QU O x " ~ O .9 v" c cw .. ~. `m N O L U ~ C V O O O) o o OS C> .O G T .~ ~ ,L ai't y in C ~ O N O G ~ O O .. O m ^~ m C c. L N U y o 0' ~ m N S ai 3' > O N~ ~ ~ C Q ... °o mr°.w v o °a c a°' i'r E .~N ~o v, o m~~. O ~ ~ cd y a g o .°m o c'a . ~ m ai c C O N ~ c r y 0 ~ o L'~ k G~G~ f~6 C O .~ ~ ~ O N U .Y ¢ o u~~ d ~ c G O Q~ ~ •p ~ ~~ y a i 1.. ~ C Y C (~ C O~ O y _ a N E N O .LO' +O' t 9 V E ~ m N N~ N N O U N N x '~ i ~~ O .~ p w ._ ~ O O O O f6 N O i Y i C O O C h O~ N X 0 0 C W C 'r 4.x0 ~. .a o O.L -o m O m O W f0 ^ m~ o~ ~ n m c = • n m ~ o c~ o ~ w . c. v ° m . N o o m c - o o j a s o ~~ O ca a s o . . E s' a °= v ~ ~ , ~ 3 ~ N O Y ~a w - d m ~ u N ~ O O C >+ U N y h L ~ N G ~ d~ j t. O o 9 7 V t ~...° s t U w ~ o. n o O ~, 3 ~ ~n C m ~ -0 ° , d °_ 3 E n °' a o °i `m N N ~ o C `~ N m C L ~ O t O O Q N L o C~ d O , . , j fn CS G O L T C N N E -~ 3 M" ' N p 7m ~3d3 m> o~m L ~> t ~~ c0 W co yak d b o~ O N N O N ~ b ~W ~° y ° o~v a~ ~o~° m o'o d~~ -00 m 0 o d a+ C' m O C y O c~ O_ O ~ -0 ~ d O y m N~ m y O a O. 0 0 ~$ p N O? CS N a~ ~ L > i c N N C .0. > > ~ E fD C H ~ '" ~•~ Y~ y o v' a°' c a`~3~ c a hy~~ >~ O y u i.h 5 o~ v$ v o o ~ v a m~ ~c N ai chi ~ a .~ V . a i S ~ E H m 'tiv~ s ° yc~ y~~~ > m`~~ G' E t. c Oq v , o c N 3 L N Q' ~, LL OV V] „C V., v F-' O d w L O) O) F .N N '(/I t +. O h C c 3 (C N F• L C -0 ti d y N c rn .y 0 c O .~ N C m 7 U N r m w N p E 0 a 0 r m c m c EXHIBIT G P390 N N N .'C., t_ 3 c a~ N .y C O U T l0 U N L U `m m m m °i t... O m U m ~ a 0 U `o w a~ a ~ ~ U c ~ o N U C ~ rn U y o t w ~ o m° L v . 3 w w o N ~ ._-. T C c6 ,N ~~ o m ~ L ~ fA N 7 U ~ ~ - n c_L my y c `m N w '~ o z w U W o ~ " : E m gym: w ~ __ s d f $ c -- d' m ~ is - R° m ~ - _- : ~ ,m~-- _ E m C ~~ ' X C i 'o~ Rio E E ~c ~E s ` ESE m s lf ~ n a_ ~s a . a vi N ~ ww ~ N f9 x~ 1~I1 V! ! y , ~ d N N ~ O ~ ~ d N 3f 4rT N a t3 N ~,w ri ~ ~ C C _ N ~i~ _m ~ K _ - N N X am .a p E v- yE ~ NE _ Z--r. d v~ d E N N _ ~ V. N ~~ d O1 C a W a ~~ N On ' W ._ a° ~~ x °' a d °' m ~ '~ °' o0 y ~.. _ ma • rn~ ~, `oo 5c crn ~ oiC .- a ~ ~ ~ ~~ r ~ _ ~ d a y 0 i i f' r ~ n ~~ U ~, c~ fn F i~< - C C C C o~ m E 10 -c C _a m-. C ~ d E N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z y C d_- -- a~ ~ ` ~ c ~~ m m a ~ m ~ - . oa ~ ~ a ~~ ~, ~ _ '''~ crn ~.. c ~w: e_ y _`„ Vi C- N c o G N_ ~ E i a E a ~~~~ -edm;~ ~: ~ OW mU aH[AOF ~' QW 4j N G N m .n L O h G a N m r 0 a~ U N h a 0 a c ~ . . ~ ` O ~ _ ~ ~ ~, N ~ ~ c i m ~ Q r ~ o .c N O o N ~" ~a a o ~a ° ~ • ~ ya N ~ C C C O d ~ m m ~.~ h y s m m ° Z ~ O N ti U U N ~ ~ P391 ~ o O ~ N N i i` ~ O 'V O Cl I ' C U C ~ ! ~ c i ~... '~~ O V m O V m . ~';-., i Kam m ~ R' ~ d m { ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E E E ~ E f.: 'r.. 't 4 H ~= E " ~~ tl ~~S ~ N I N N l V N tll 4O" N N ? N N ~- N tD 1 N ~- 0 1~ N fO ~ L aNi ' ~ E m N ~ ° E ~ ~ i.~ ~ ~ N r M ~ ~ N~9 ? G ^ ] ~ y 't ~: l~.~. c oic~ ~._ x m K ~ n n N rn ~._ N E ~ m ~~ s ~ ' ~ E c 'A P~ ~ ~'~'~ ; ~ i C1 y ~ `a n '& C1 ~ . m .~ a N.,-' .- n 4 , A N N ,- ,- a .- d ,- .,- .- ~ ~a0` c ~, ~ ~ ~~ o ~:$: ~ ~- ~ to ~ = F- ~ K y ~ c t ct © ~ . ~,~ c g E •c ~ ~, N p, m E .o. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a Nn ~ ~ q', m a v~ W ~n Tam ~ ~ E' ; ~ ~ a 'en Saw ~ w ~ a ~~„ aiiu;. ~~ ' ~ ~ a© ~i= a o - m v ~ E g E ~ ':-:o y ~ V H H '-^'E a c ~ ~ `n ~~ w E ~ " ~ O ~ ~ a iU. W Z F -~ ~ It CJ [~ m y ° - 3 c O ~ , y j .Q N 0 G m G G ~ O > vG__ Q vi ~ N ~ ~ ~ U_ ~ W ~ y ~ N O O O ~ ~ O aGi a~ '.. c .?, m c jj y y Q~ N O S O y U ~ ~ ~ ~ y 0 m N V ;O y G ~ N C '4 N 1 p C~ 3 Y N m Q_ ~ t~ m E ~ y c c y U ~~ ~ ~ Qa m~ o~ ~ G cn ~- G c a ~i ~ o . t Ot "~ m m y Q .. ~ y ~ - G ~ V o ~ w E 3s m C c .., E ~ '°' m ~~ N ~ f_...0 ~ E O ~ ~ m yg a. m c~ c? ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ U O o y .- m O a c ~, S y '6- N~~ ( O p ~ ~ ~~ R ~ o _rn t N s" h a m t O 3~ ~ w ~ c ~ m c c ~ h n~ m ~ m m~° o m d c ~~ ~ . U ~ _~' C 'o Cmi y O> ~ o ° :c r °' a o a, ~ N~ ~ ~ ~ Q m y G v,c v, -- 3mc von ya o ~ o o.g~ ~ o ~, .., ~ Ea ~ ~ rn~ a c ao o m :-. ~ 0 ... 3 a i ~ U ~ a~ ~ O 'O ~ y ~ N j y 3 a V `~ =' O r 0 h O L O y N t N p y .'" c ~ 3 E mo :oo a m m L o c o m 0 m•~ a m o ~ ° ' ~ ° 'c a o a:., m - . .. . o - . ma , n ~ c O a N ~ . N . CGi O> ~ t U ~ m a o o~° o m E P392 ~ ° L C ~ . y ~ ~ O f6 7 ' ~f ~ ~ "" N O CV Q ...~ N .Q y N ~ f0 N O O U C y y N t C o,NO a ~~o m ~a~c o ~ ~ r o ai -o ~ 'w .. _ o p V O 00 C 'Ul L ° 3 Q N N f4 Y .y.~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ 7 fn "~ L N C O ~ ~ ~ QI ~ O) N O 30 ~ a '.C-+ w ~ N t0 (n y ::. y Q N~ ~. O .. N N Q "O C 'T O ~ C t U ~ ~ 3 ~ O O ~ ~ _O y ,., f6 O a U L ~ y - M cD C - U V~ N C~ N. ~: O. U °~ f6 O C O ~ O.Q ~ ~ - C ~ O Q .y 3 C ~O rOL N i '° a y W L O fA Q N ]~ ` N ..y. N .~... ~ 1+ -'~G ~ 3 ~ p O N O f° a +-~ N +r 3 0° c~ z~~ y E °~ __ m °=' ~ ~ m -o~v ~ o c ~ma, ao ENm `.~° ~o ° o m ° m ~-o c c p~ c ~ti o co cw 4: ~ _ c ,~ r G o ,_, ~ ~ Q o om~ ~.~ Uc~ m o Y p, y N cn .`~~ ~~ ~ o a:~~ m me `w° ca rn a ~, o a~ ~ n ~.~ ~~ ~• ~ t N "O U~ y O C C t ° ... y~ C y~ ~ ~ N +.. y 7 Q U rn ya °' m .~~ ai ~ `~ ~ c ~- y' c wo~ °, c `w° aci ~"m axi a~ ° U N ~ N ° O ~ Q Z' C ~ -O E ~, mo ° 'o~' ~ a°'o a •o ~ b~va, as Nevi" ors aE U~ N C L D W C-O N NL ~ m ~ '~ ~ G 7 ~ c~E 3 ~ ~ m Z E -C -G J V cn ~ v ° O O E m 0 a~ a a~ 3 0 a L 0 y a u '=ao 0 c v a P393 ii 0 W 4 N N ti W O 4 ! ~ r 4 j r, D ~ S .. ~y ~ ~ i:- ~ ~ ( ~ .e. _.. . a ~.._ ~ ~ `1. ..- .. i ~ f ~~ E I ~. . ~ } iF.~ ue . ' w i ~ I ~~.,.. ; '~ t ~ ~.. .4 :.t., t ~ ~~ o ~ &Q ~~ x ~ ~ 1 ¢ ~ ~.~~.: { ao 0 V C N O u Y QJ U R O V A C ~ v ~ v.. .~ O -G ~ L O O U y V L tC O .D a. y R dq 'C C R1 .3 o ~ . ~ R ~ o ~ ~ o O y Y fn v O t3 C y.. C in O h Q. 'C ~ ~ L A ~ C t]. O ~. RS bA L ~ ~ N Y ~ V C ~ CL y ~ ~. t Y W L 'D N N u ~ ~ cam. s, O O U 'y d L d N ~ N .D C 7 O L L to ~ Y yyi U 7 ~ a -O o a m P394 N C O C m v X W R .y. C d `1 .~ a d Y V d N °v 0 M c O d N N 9 a .~ v m w C N C 0 d ~O a` O w C d L v R O v C W 3 0 Q W j O c N y h L fC ~ N °' ° ~ o m ~~ ~ a ~3 $,~ ~ 3.° E -C m U o yo `,,, ~ ~ c~i o c `° o Y -p t-. a m E .° a m c `~ ... v ~c ~.~ °~ ~ ~m Eo ~tm ami3 to v N O ~ „_ .E me `o 'm UQv od Qt rno ~' ~ e ~ ~ ma`c"~ y~'y m-`mo Nom" Nv ~ O o°'o _aw a`m~ cQ`m Noc 7 N y y ~- O°~ n~ .L-. O C ~° y N ~ a c o ~do~a ,~m3 mmo ~ .~ ti v e Eooy °yu~ .vQ•c o O d o.~ ~Za o, ~' a d s d Q. w w 3 t o ~., m ~n -c ° o, a. ,o L o w i O ~ i oxzi e v ~ ~ ~ h a ¢ ~ ~ aai O ~ U O `'"Y a ~~ c~N ~ N~ VDU ~ C f0 a~ ~ ..p N .- (0 d W L N N N N D O f0 (~6 .~. o y" "' c~ y c N n E a i r U c0 N U ~o ~ ~UCOQ c°i rn.~ °'~ y O c t c E ~ E t o ~ ~ c~~~t wY ~ N a~ m y~ ~ aa.~ y~ro3 mn` ~~~Q c~ O o~a ~ 3 >.N v Y.oY ~ ~~ W E =p ~ .~ ~ o m y r ~ o na o. N a:~ O C~ ~ d d .C N C~ 0 0 C J ,~O O (O l t O c ~~ O `~ a n `~~O~m~ add ~~ ~N ~ >. w G obi ~ N 'o o f O o ~°~ ~ v m> y~ ~ ~ y i N O a `~- O O~ A N N W~ .0 r ~ o N ~ ° ~, ~ E am o~S y m c ~'=' y ~ Q T ~ ~ ~= a~~~a Q d c ~ '~ o-c0 ~ L '~ o - l4 !A V~ L aU o. ~ v ~ .~o 0 5`"~y~aaci yoo v y. O C a m~ .Q ° E ~, cm°~'m ~"~ a~i as c~6 O V f6 U N ~ c a-o Y~UE~ -mod cm co y ~ c (A 'O `~ y N Q N O O N B C t C~ ~~ > Q~ c ~ ~-e Y'a ~c°o. `~j OC' gnu ~m`aiY. f6 T^ N j •Q y o °' ° o cmi v ~ t ~ aci y ~ a N ~ ;`T' LL1 Ov - E o' Qro a~ avc ~ o o ~ ~ d > o-c QU wE ~~ o°~ >•~oo~~' a3iry ~~F-aim cow NN Q ee°i m.-:E~ooo c•-7 ~E ,~~ N"a N OL O a'c Q' oo~° rna rn° m ~~ N o d U C v rn~ ~ m N ~,~y ~~m=mc L~o cacit i~ l ~ ~c ~ L O Q O N O m a o ~ ~ N c m ~ w K ~ `-' ~ G U ~ (0 Y f6 ~ II. a.. ° O O C m T m ~ W~ L w^a ~ ~~ LO +~~ ~~ a da>~~~ coo oo,~..' U eo m ~ m 1` ~ c.~~~ °~Ya;_~- o,c`m c~Nt co ~/ w L~~~ H Q Q C ~ C~ ° C C~ Q CND ~~ ~ ~{~yU~ A"t~~~° °~`' ~UE~E N d- E = C l c c 7 7 ... ~ O y O .- Gi ~~ d ,~ L v w~ o y ~; o m o c c m~~._ 3 w= y n._ m U '~~r y o O °a d o ymoa~i~h~ °~',~ 'oc Qm m C .~ N a s ++ y~ e o~ on ~ E~ h ~~ ~ d~ ~~ ~ c~i ~ ~ V °~a 3 c m ~o o.. 3 r m Z~~ ~ N d= e n d ~U U cV ~.~ d o ~ v °u 3 o a:. P395 P396 c O s N ~ ~ '_' w .~ E~ m _ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~C -p ~ tq ~` U N ~ ~ +~' p ~ a -c 3 ~ ~ c ~~ . .. N aco ~ ~v ~ a ~ cn ~ ~ ... 3 .-. c .4 ~ L ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ n~ o ~~ ~~~ cram ~~ ~ m ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ N L ~ N ~> Q U O ~~ (0 3 m ~ O O H o Y c~ t 00 ~ C ~ ~O ~,~ ~ i N ~. y ~ ~ .Oi'Q O ~ Q ~ iQ' +.. o ~ ~ m 0 L~ 0 .~ .~ N~ ~ m E ~ J ~ ca ~ ~ cq ~' ~ G ... O t N ` O U_ O N ~a~ ~ _ ~ ~ Q C v ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ > ~ O fE ~ ~ -O c N y N N (~ _ ~ ~a ~ p i O N N EL N ~, C ~ ~~ p~ ~~ N a`~ ~ m .~ N Y O B O O O a~ ~ c a L O O_ O to ~~' ~ tq _ ~ mom ~ d ~ U~~ h~ w~ ca 3 ~~ L ~ m a~ U N ca .L O ~ c 3 O a~ o p ~ ~_ N 7 ~ _~ fA L f0 .... O ~' L ~ ^N N ~ O ~~ O c~~ ,~ ~ ~ O O L C ~~ i N ~ U w w G N ~ N ~~ 7 m 0 Q >, N w O 'N c~_ ~ ~ U Q ~ '` U G ~ Q _ O O ~ _ _ ~ om° ~ c o O ~~ U ~ ~ O c E n °c aUi O > ca^~ iY~ .G1 L O ~•~L m m ~ ~ ar ca ~ ~ ~ ~ d Z V y N O p~vr Q N ~ _ y O N NL. .C O ~ C ~ ~ ~ U ,1 ~ _ ~ ~ .~ ~~ LO ca N O ~ ~ R co r o .a y N ~ N ~ '~ (n U 'Q O ~~ ~ UJ °~ -o c N ~ ~ U O C C m p U -~ .O ~ w m o r O O N O _ N > i ~~ ~ N o ~ ~ ~ w 3 E O O R O N .E o ~ ~ N ~ O p> o N ~- ~ ~ 'O ~ ~ 4 d N m m ~ °~ t+ O C~ .Q ~~ ~ Y O f0 ~ U Y ~ ~ ~ O N O C E O L~ .~ ~ o °' ~ a w V) ~ ~ ~ o J v ~ a ~~ P397 C ~ U O p <0 ~ U U 3 ~ C ' L -O O .n fn N V O N C C U «, C N _ N~ N c c N 'o m ~i c m aNi a ~ Q ~ ~ mw E ~ io a ~ ~~ ~ o ~ tL ~~£ `N N N ~~ ~ ~ N E~ N ~ 0= N O O) N L ~ _ O t A L Q O C ~O ~. E ` L H C 'O ~ f0 y V L ~ C ~ >~ p Qj 'N ~ _N N w?•~ ~ m ~ 3 ~ ~ m° °'~ N ~ ~~ F~ N O N O . U C .N. ~ N O .N N y O~ O '~ ~ U 'U N ~~ 7 p C N ry ~ C O _ d C ~ N O N ~ ~ R t a ~ N ~ U~~ ... ¢3 O N ~ O o U NE f6 o ~ N °o. _ ~~~N w p o^N~ Y ~ O. c.>> E.a N C O'er ~s- L N ~ ~ T ~ ~ C T y o .+ .. . C . ~ ~ ~~ o aNi 3t °~ v ~ m ~ m na o 0 ° ~ m O 2 0 a p > H ~ N c a m E ° m - I 2 N~ 0 ~~ X w N~ N - L N C N~ L E cnv mni ~ ~ °' ° ~v v m N m ~' ~ °U'a ~ c6 C L N U ~ p rn N C m .~ -O N 7 ~ Z ~ ~ t i) C j V j a N > N W ] a. C~ ~ y~ C O ~ O M N C X d ~ m O _ C N N c0 ~~ N~ 'x ~ w ~ N Q O m ~ f 6 ` ~ _ Y O w N O N N .'C.. Q G ` L ~ i W C a ~ O L_ d C N p I~ Z t9 N~ O A ~ f6 7~ O) O "O ~ ~>` ~ N~° m em a ~ aci ~° m N ayi y o m N u) £ L~~ d N . L O O ~. N C ~ ~ N N ~L7 '_. N W C d ;~ N £ _ ~~ Q - C 7 N a N d E A H N O L __ `• N ~- E O N N -~ W > H U D ~ N O L d O O O N .+ N - (~ t7 ;_, . V . O fA d p C ` v L L ~ d~ U N O N N. 0 N~ ~ C N ~ . + . ~ ' ~ N ~ a Z' o ~ aNi ,~ `~ ° ° °' ~ ~ o ~~ N •a~ C i, 0 R f C O Q ~~~ ~ L= ~ ~` N a 47 ~. ~p ` 'C C N D Q N• V L .... F- d 3 O N U O. ~ N .Q - y d o j v c . .. ~ ~ .m , O W y m -O > U N N C ~, d p E a L ~ U V~ L j N L d Z A ~ N ~ 'NO O (ND "O E N V ~ H lC O N Q m'C ~ Z ~ 7 -O C ] u- N W O C L N ~ ~ N N C f6 .N. 'O ' Q O f0 O y C~ 0 C 3~ L ~ f6 ~ w N V w ~ p (6 .~ ,~ 0 p ' ~ N 'O N Q~ w~ Q ~ W N i~ ~ N N U f w 3 O ~ ' O f9 O S 0 N~ U O ~ ~ N p7 a O ~ ~ > N N Q V C ~' . , p1 L Y O` »- O -~ f6 z ~ ~m • c N oZc~ a~ W Q ~ ~ ~~m n'~ ~ "O U ~ F O` 'O » O N c`o 3 ' ~ w AN > 3 N "' 7 N a r O N O N N Q. =~ ° c ~~ ~yp N o ~ c a ~ t = aL a ia i ~ u ic . 0 0~ (n C O J N ~' 7 Z fp C ~ H H O '~ O O p ~ d y d d " L _ P398 N N N C .N 7 .•_~+ N C O O m N C .~. N N a m N m C f6 .~ ~i N m C N 7 d N c O C N 7 U O N fn N U U f6 N c m r N 0 m n a O O 7 O W Z LL W W a W J a N N fp 7 c 0 .~ U O O 7 O 0 O ~O T c O V d N ~ N c ~ cB £ ~ . ~ c = ui C ~ ~ w ~ ~, N O ~ O O c6 ~~ p V N ~ ~ ~U Un i ~• • - Z L ~ (0 N ~ C~ c~a ~ > ~ ~ N ~ ~ O .. LZ O a- N ~ ~ ~~ ~ > O ~ ~ O ~ N O •~ H U ~ m x ~ f6 ...~ -p a cn N ~ '~ ~, N ~ c6 O m~ 'a O O L N N L Q~ off . N . c x ~" O ~•3 ++ _ ~ N t0 ~ fn ~_ c ~ ~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ i=+ c a ~ N _ ~ c N (0 Q N ~ ~ ~ ` C 'p ~ ~. ~ U a~ i a ~ ca ~ n fA O w ~' O ~ C N L w f6 •~ N U t0 ~ ,. L ~ ~ ~' ~ U ~ ~ l4 (fl !n ~ O L F" N -+ c y 7 N Q a••' C a o C ~ O a "' O-L ~' ~ O N ~ •° ~ O x C L N Q O 0 0 ~- "~ +N+ u V O O c~ :.= G ~ N j N=° N Uo~ ~ ai°~ ~ c 0 Q O ~ ~ a ~ 'O N a Z O ~ ~ ~ ~ N co ~ > O (p (0 lC Iq O ~ aNU ~ O . t - i x ~ N C Z mmQ C c (n ~ O ~~ N~ Q' `~ N O S - C V i c C 'p W t6 N ~ C o - p~ L ~ 0 0, ~ ~+ (/~ N O 7 Y w V r ~ ~ a t ~.~ •- =_ d m ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~ Q U X • tU fn X P399 •N _ U ~ ~ N w -6 C ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ N O co -p ~ rn E .r ~ c '~ a ~ m -c o Q ~ g o N a i > -6 o ~ m J ay ~ m ` ~ ~• ca >, Q ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ o 0 0 . O N > ~ O p, "O U w ~ ^ > (~ _ `~ ~ - a O C (p N O ~ U ~ (6 O ' ~'O ~ i M ~ Q ~ ~ ~ .- O~ O Y I~ ~ 2 0 C cn O ~ i U ~ Q ~ ~ O N o L U ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ M ~ O ~ . N , ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a I- O > N c6 - ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ 7 ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ m ... a 6 ~ m . ~ O _ a~i ~ s .E m o a~ ~ c`v ~ ~ r a a~ °-~ L -° ~V '~ h ~ N ~ O ~ ~ > O ~ U ~ C +J L ~ ,, _ "'' L ~ ~ ~i N L !A ~ 7 .C h N 7 ~h ~ N ` O O U C C O ~ C . C O > ~ Q~ ~ O U ~ t o C ~ c ~ c m ~ C~u ~ ~ ° ~ i ° 7 ~ ~ C ~ L ~ ~ ~ c ~ ° -OQ ~ N io E o N ~ w ~ ~ 2 ~ o ~ . c a i - ~ c ... ~ aai ~ m _ ~ $ ~ ' _ ~~ o ~' `° c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .v N ~ Y v ~ ~= E ~ y .~ m a~ a~ ~•- v cu v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > a~ ~ m a cn ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ o ° > m ~ '~ ~ ~~ c E ~ o ~ c -° - a L m ~ c ~ ~ v i a i ~ co c o c 6 ~ Q ~ N p tp m ' G1 ~ L ~ ~ O U ~ E ~• ~ > O > ~ ~ E ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ x a ° ~ ~ ° o ~~ ~, o .~ ~ ~ a _ ~ _ s ~ o ~X ~ E = N P400 ~., 4 8 • ,~ .~ _~ i0 b „~;; r -~. a Q. C ,~ 117 Q N tr! ~ (O eR~ lri r Q 4~'1 Q N 6 1C tri m m G t'7 t'7 ~ lLi m r N r st r ~ r r N7 1L>i ti ~ ~' ~ ~ m ,~ ~ .- ~ a r N ~; 4 r11 O b 1y'~ 1~ O a d V V fi V c a a o; a 0 P401 o T 'O y m m C d ~ ~ m o I m _a «.. cm a~ c_ C C :. a N poi N m 7~X U G m U ~ y 0 07 U W O a. •~ m m d a m m$ C U.L.. m C ~ (~ d C °' ~ O ~ O E m 0 i ONa o a U oc c L 3 - d~ x mNa o. o~ om V d L ~ ~ d C~ ° N L N . D N N ~N 10 O O ~ ~ .C Y E C N U " p j N d ~ L. O ' ~? a0. >.~ O O ~ C O C y ~ V~~~ 0 m !~ N - N ~ C ° o aE a . ~ ~'m a c ~ aL`m~ ~ ~~`o $c ~ N L m ~ L ~ Q d y T O an d U ~ N i6 U y y0-_, ~~ a ~ N dQ m L ~ L U ° 0 a> `p ~- r 1] y C m m m V V C O C m L d 0 N- C m d . C i ~ o y r - a ~~ m m n o c o a~ >~ m w m v in 'c a ~ m a m y m o ~ ~ O o ~>wOCi c °' mo y mm m 0 oOUE C7 ~N ~~ d c Q d ' d w n c ~'1a o c m o Yacn a ~ a o d o E o c o ~ v L_ ~ .o y ~•~ `0 - m m ~ 3a m - m~a c ~ o ~ nm ~ m 7 m= m E N ~ C °- a E w o y m ` m C E N a m o ~ N ~ ~ O m o C9 O m J m> d + . O m .~ L C ~ C mO c~ m d~ $ mN~ E . o... ~ m ~~O d a 5 T?~ dL O O m = y ~? a~c O. 1n y Q da E ~ m m'- m ~ ~ C G c m 7 >. v N ~ . ' N C m O ' O y N Ol U E 'N C d y C ~ ~ (0 ~ O. r > m o d y m anv d d N om N d m ~ n0 ~ E ~ O N (Q m my 'O N~ >` C C E C ` mnmc ~ c~o > mc 14d ~x m ammo m Ey~ a~~o. E d- C O 'O 'O C .d. C ~ ~ N. ~ '~ U N N V .W d 01 N m 1C 0 m iU O i0 U ' C N ~ m E ~ a N E° C m O ~ N d m m E > m c U O m . N T O m O ~ C y E ~C N v m ~ U E d C L~ {{pp E O p. N om~ T N N O am U' w !=30 0 N ~ y~ ~ N '~ ~~ O m ~ C C ~ ~ C U a m N N ~ w L N L N n N d U C N O - F N t O N c m~ a . 0 ~ •O+ t c U n ° y d Tm E ~ c N O 0 (0 .1 V Q d ~ d L ~ ~ _ ~ ¢ a r Q m Q ~ N Ci ~ C m d N R N 0 fV N r C 0 u m N O d d a = w d O m o oz ~ ~x ~ > ~g o~ ~ m O and o o ~ m i aW ~~ ~ C ~ d F N C C N d ° Q y mQ Y N :°.E~ ~ ~ ~~ W o E o d W O L_. H ~ N oy~ ~ m O a a g ° m C . W ~ d 2 d~ O" d m °J y . ~ ~ a- C N N X LL m O d o p y a y ~ m H o o dL •~ a ~O ~~y ~ N- C N O N O ~ C O 2 ~ a~ a ~ ~? °a E c ° O V c ~ U N ~ Y L N C 9 ` ~ y O C Z o C C C p ~ Z Z c~a v . C U J - r ~. d j W m~ o d d N ~, v Z ady~ $O yE~ . o~ ~ p U ~~ p p~ S c o° c .O y x C~Ili O O x rn~ m C L a rn ~ R~W ~t~ N ~ d O.} O mQly U C Zop y m aSW ~ 7 m ~m$ C ~ C o ~ N C N d y c S ~ cN ~ L E~ c tQ ° U UD -o W O~ O c d ~ ~} F U= t d y W ~ a 'o d dW W d3~ t m>Z °doW a vy " ~ 3> ad °Q v i. ~=d - Q mw c mZ U o d= ~~ a~~C7 m > O c N'F' 'os JZ , _ W ~ Ua r i0 U E ~ O E m c .- o ~a O ocK _ U~U2 crn N om N y d d U oa C N d da d~ y N F U •O (,. 'U d' a o W Dl C C Q C O C G C 7 m c m O OOi~ o.~ z c !0 mLL a yaU oc> ~ ~ o d Ea ~ L- `? 6 mF Hy 10 t.. T m2 N U d. ~ U ip t/1 00 02 ~ U ~. ~ oI= g ~ ~ Q: :.} m W O i O obi m W o~«(7 V_ ~ V d C O U Z T L ° 0%im a~ ~ E `Y « ~ ~c- m~ c X IOW N W p } N N a U~ mO L L p} ~ N O. J oLL cG ° ~ ~ m'c3 100°a ' a mp - O ~ ? cd' aW y U c L° ~ c c - oE o1L EZ L aka ~ ° a0 O m d0 V N ~,wH oy U"-~ 9 yU O.H Ed - - - N m O m EcS O mN7 :?ccQ ' S H W d IL C O m moo" "w Y d o cW NadF 3 s a d - ~dy 'p c ~ r 'g m E a d a LL A K . ~'U~ H .c ._ ~ ai ¢ ~' d Z J a w y W x H LL Q F Z a w H y a 2 Z W 2 r c m a m d c d d 0 U d 0 v C m m 0 a m O m m .3 d y C U C m a m N m 9 m 0 a O O. d F fN P402 P403 Fees for New Services in the Development Code Update Application Current Fee Proposed Fee Conditional Use Permit-Modification $2,634 $1,317 Development A reement -Modification $11,631 $5,815 DevelopmenUDesi n Review- Residential -Modification $11,816 $5,908 DevelopmenUDesi n Review -Residential 4 du's or less -Modification $6,629 $3,314 DevelopmenUDesi nReview-Commercial/Industrial-Modification $11,379 $5,689 Entertainment Permit -Modification $4,765 $2,383 Minor Develo ment Review -Modification $2,535 $1,268 Tentative Parcel Ma -Modification $7,211 $3,606 Tentative Tract Ma -Modification $13,250 $6,625 Uniform Si n Pro ram -Modification $1,912 $956 Site Plan Review 0 $98.20 per hour EXHIBIT H P404 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting May 23 2012 Chairman Munoz called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:35 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Frances Howdyshell, Lou Munoz, Francisco Oaxaca ABSENT: Ray Wimberly STAFF PRESENT: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; -Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer; Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Jeffrey Bloom, Interim Planning Director / / R 4 R ANNOUNCEMENTS None ....» APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Fletcher; seconded by Oaxaca, carried 4-0-1 (W imberiy absent), to approve the minutes of May 9, 2012. .,.,, PUBLIC HEARINGS A. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00571 AND ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-A comprehensive update to the Development Code including a request to replace Title 17 (Development Code), modify Chapter 2.24 (Historic Preservation), modify Chapter 1.12 (Penalties, Administrative and Civil Remedies and General Provisions), delete Chapter 5.12 (Regulation of Entertainment), delete Title 14 (Signs), delete Chapter 19.08 (Tree Preservation) and other clarifying amendments of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code as well as a proposed addendum to the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR). This item will be forwarded to the City Council forfinal action. B. DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE 2012 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-Consideration of a proposal to establish new development fees for Planning services as a result of the creation of new application types in the comprehensive update to the Development Code (DRC2010-00571). This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. EXHIBIT I P405 Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). In response.to Commissioner Fletcher, Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said that the definition for an assembly use applies to both religious and non-religious groups and treats them equally. (Definitions found on Page 113 of the agenda packet). In response to Commissioner Oaxaca, Ms. Nakamura said that the implementation of the new Code gives the opportunity for large retail property owners to amend their current signage package. She said commercial centers with a Uniform Sign Program would need to pay the modification fee and apply for the requested changes. In response to Vice Chairman Howdyshell, Ms. Nakamura said wind turbines are one of those uses that are on the horizon but are not specifically designated as a land use. She said staff wants to address this but we are not ready to provide recommendations. She said it will be included on the annual work plan that will include such items. She said the existing wind turbine is located in what has been deemed a utility facility. In response to Commissioner Fletcher, Ms. Nakamura said, if a use is similar to one found in the code, the Planning Director can review it and make a determination. Some uses may be totally unlike any other use and then it would be not allowed. It would require the passage of an amendment for the use to be allowed. She said new types of uses are always surfacing. In response to Chairman Munoz, Ms. Nakamura indicated that because of feedback received, future wind turbines may have to be brought forward to the Commission for review. She said with respect to the issue of medical care versus extended care, staff continues to work with applicants to help them work though the layers of zoning in-the Haven Overlay. She said general medical care has been reinstated to the Haven Overlay. In response to Commissioner Fletcher, Ms. Nakamura said some changes in the Land Use Table may create some non-conforming uses. She said there will be unintended consequences and we may have to come back and make changes; it will take time for all the issues to shake out. In response to Commissioner Fletcher, the decision to only allow hot food trucks with a permit for special events was to protect the brick and mortar restaurants/businesses. She said pre-packaged food trucks will still be allowed to operate as before. Chairman Munoz opened the public hearing. Luana Hernandez asked if staff deleted the Tree Preservation section. She mentioned a parking lot issue at Bank of the West adjacent to the JC Penny outlet store. Ms. Nakamura said Tree Preservation has been moved to be incorporated into Title 17 -the Development Code. Ed Dietl asked what a stakeholder is and how are they determined. He asked for clarification regarding the modification to Chapter 2.24 of the Municipal Code (Historic Preservation). Chairman Munoz closed the public hearing. Ms. Nakamura said the existing Historic Preservation Ordinance is being incorporated into the Development Code so that all requirements are there in one place. She said this is also true with signs and tree preservation. She said no changes were made to the Historic Ordinance; only the numbers changed. With respect to stakeholders, they are people from the community that have a voice and provide great input such as real estate agents/brokers, sign companies, Chamber of Planning Commission Minutes -2- May 23, 2012 P406 Commerce representatives, and the business community. She said the historic groups were also invited and PMC held the interviews and they talked about what they felt was important in the Code towards goals and objectives. She said they were asked for comment at the beginning and at the end of the process. Chairman Munoz pointed out that we are all stakeholders and the City had many public meetings and invited the public to comment several times on the Code update. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said that all the law requires is two public hearings here and again before the City Council. He said everything else was extra effort to go above and well beyond the requirement and still one more public hearing remains. Pam Johns, PMC stated that once they heard from the stakeholders, then vetted their comments with scorecards given to the general public; it was a thoughtful process. Chairman Munoz stated that the information was shared broadly. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said it was a great report and thanked staff and the consultant. Commissioner Oaxaca agreed and said he is glad to see that the City is taking a look at the fee schedule particularly a fee based on time and modified permitting fees. He complimented the efforts. Commissioner Fletcher agreed and said staff did an excellent job; there was an extra effort to get input. He commented on who stakeholders are and their function in the process. He said he supports the idea that the document will be reviewed on an ongoing basis as this is a big improvement to our current process.- Chairman Munoz said that they regularly use the drawings at the DRC. He thanked staff for all that was done in only a year and noted that such a short timeframe is very unusual. He offered kudos to all. Motion: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Oaxaca, to adopt the Resolution Recommending approval of DRC2010-00571 and the associated Addendum to the EIR to be sent to the City Council for final action carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA NOES: NONE ABSENT: WIMBERLY -carried # k i( i( DIRECTOR'S REPORTS PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer presented the staff report and n ed' at several informational sheets have been placed before the Commissioners fortheir ew and consideration. In response to Vice Chairman Howdyshell, Mr. Dyer said the trail i ies recommended by the Trails Advisory Committee are located in the Beautification ion. In response to Commissioner Oaxaca, Mr. Dyer said the Base Line interchange een in process a long time. He said it was slated for funding by the RDA but now thos nds have been taken away and we are unsure if we will have funds. In response to Com ~ sinner Fletcher, Mr. Dyer said 47 million is a little less than average Minutes -3- May 23, 2012 P407 RESOLUTION NO. 12-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00571, A COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Municipal Code Amendment No. DRC2010-00571 for a comprehensive update to the City's Development Code found in Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 2. On May 23, 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 23, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The City has prepared a comprehensive update to the City's Development Code that implements the policies of the General Plan, which was updated in 2010. The City made the Public Draft Development Code Update ("Public Draft")available for public review in April 2012. The Public Draft is a comprehensive revision and update of Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code that sets requirements for private development of property, including development standards, permitted uses, building heights,'buildingsefbacks, parking standards, sign standards, landscaping requirements, subdivisions, animal keeping regulations, and other development-related topics. The Public Draft is included as Attachment 1 to this Resolution and is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. b. Based on feedback received regarding the Public Draft, the City prepared a set of revisions (the "Revisions"), which is included as Attachment 2 to this Resolution and is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. c. City staff has also identified numerous non-substantive amendments ("Additional Amendments') that will need to be made to provisions of the Municipal Code outside of Title 17 to accommodate the proposed Development Code Update. The Additional Amendments include but may not be limited to those noted in Attachment 3 to this Resolution. d. The Public Draft, as amended by the Revisions and together with the Additional Amendments, constitutes the Development Code Update. EXHIBIT J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-23 DRC2010-00571 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Development Code Update May 23, 2012 Page 2 e. The Development Code Update conforms to and does not conflict with the General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. f. The Development Code Update will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The City has prepared an Addendum (the "Addendum") to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Ptan Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2000061027) (the "Final EIR"), attached hereto as Attachment 4 to this Resolution, which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the Development Code Update were adequately addressed in the Final EIR and that a subsequent EIR or negative declaration is not required for the Development Code Update. The Planning Commission finds that the Addendum complies with the California Environmental Quality Act, its implementing regulations at 14 California Code of Regulations § 15000 et seq., and the City's local CEQA guidelines (collectively "CEQA") based also on the following specific findings and determinations: a. On May 10, 2010, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution Number 10-068, adopting environmental findings pursuant to CEQA, certifying the Final EIR, adopting a statement of overriding considerations and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The General Plan specifically contemplated a revision and comprehensive update of the Development Code such as is accomplished by the Development Code Update, and the Final EIR analyzed the impacts thereof. b. The Development Code Update does not propose substantial changes to the City's development regulations that were not analyzed in the Final EIR or that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The Project simply implements the goals and policies adopted in the City's General Plan and analyzed in the Final EIR. c. There have been no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Development Code Update is being undertaken that were not contemplated in the Final EIR or that will require major revisions of the Final EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The Final EIR that addressed the impacts of adopting the City's General Plan and revisions to the land development code was adopted on May 10, 2010. The existing conditions reported in the Final EIR are very similar to those currently in existence. Since adoption of the General Plan in 2010, the City has not processed any amendments to the plan. As a result, there are no substantial changes to the environment which would require a modification of the Final EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. d. There is no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Final EIR was certified that shows (a) the Development Code Update will have any significant effects not discussed in the Final EIR; (b) the significant effects examined in the Final EIR will be substantially more severe than previously shown; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found to be infeasible would now be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Development Code Update; or (d) considerably different mitigation measures or alternatives P408 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-23 DRC2010-00571 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Development Code Update May 23, 2012 Page 3 than those analyzed in the Final EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment are now available. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adoptthe Addendum and approve Municipal Code Amendment DRC2010-00571 to adopt the Development Code Update. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY 2012. PLANNING COMp~ISSION~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA / , / ~. BY: ~ .Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: Candy urnett, Senior Planner P409 I, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner of the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly ahd regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Giicampnga, at a7egular meeting of he Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of May 2012; by_ihe following vote-4o-wit: ', - AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ELETCHER, HOWDYSHELL', MUNOZ, OAXACA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WIMBERLY ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE P410 The Public Draft Development Code Update was distributed under separate cover to the Planning Commission on April 4,2012 Copies are available for review at: City Hall -Planning Department Archibald Library -Adult Reference Desk Victoria Gardens Library -Adult Reference Desk James L. Brulte Senior Center -Information Desk In addition, an electronic copy is available for viewing and download on our website at www.city ofrc.us/dcu pdate ATTACHMENT 1 P411 Attachment 2 of Planning Commission Resolution 12-23 ("Revisions") is included in its entirety in the Draft Ordinance of Approval for Municipal Code Amendment DRC2010-00571 ATTACHMENT 2 P412 Attachment 3 of Planning Commission Resolution 12-23 ("Addendum") is included in its entirety in the Draft Ordinance of Approval for Municipal Code Amendment DRC2010-00571 ATTACHMENT 3 P413 The General Plan EIR was distributed under separate cover to the Planning Commission in March, 2010 An electronic copy is available for viewing and download on our website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/planning/genplan.asp ATTACHMENT 4 P414 ORDINANCE N0.855 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00571, A COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING- FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On May 23, 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Municipal Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 12-23, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On June 20, 2012, and continued to July 18, 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the amendment. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June 20, 2012 and July 18, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The City adopted its current Development Code in 1983, and has since updated and amended individual sections of that code; and b. The City desires to adopt a comprehensive update to the Development Code in order to (i) reflect the goals, policies, and implementation measures of the City's General Plan, adopted in May 2010; (ii) ensure compliance with applicable Federal and State legislation; (iii) adopt an official zoning map consistent with the General Plan; (iv) promote sustainable development; and (v) improve the organization and usability of the Development Code; and c. The City has prepared a comprehensive update to the City's Development Code that implements the policies of the General Plan, which was updated in 2010. The City made the Public Draft Development Code Update ("Public Draft") available for public review in April 2012. The Public Draft is a comprehensive revision and update of Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code that sets requirements for private development of property, including development standards, permitted uses, building heights, building setbacks, parking standards, sign standards, landscaping requirements, subdivisions, animal keeping regulations, and other development-related topics; and P415 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0.855 DRC2010-00571 -DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE July 18, 2012 Page 2 d. The City has prepared an updated zoning map which is a graphic representation of the Development Code and represents no rezoning of land, which is included as Attachment 2; and e. Based on feedback received regarding the Public Draft, the City prepared a set of revisions (the "Revisions"), which is included as Attachment 3; and f. City staff has also identified numerous non-substantive amendments ("Additional Amendments") that will need to be made to provisions of the Municipal Code outside of Title 17 to accommodate the proposed Development Code Update, which is included as Attachment 4. g. The Public Draft, including the zoning map and as amended by the Revisions and together with the Additional Amendments, constitutes the Development Code Update. SECTION 3: The City has prepared an Addendum (the "Addendum") to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2000061027) (the "Final EIR"), attached hereto as Attachment 5 to this Resolution, which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the Development Code Update were adequately addressed in the Final EIR and that a subsequent EIR or negative declaration is not required for the Development Code Update. The City Council finds that the Addendum complies with the California Environmental Quality Act, its implementing regulations at 14 California Code of Regulations § 15000 et seq., and the City's local CEQA guidelines (collectively "CEQA") based also on the following specific findings and determinations: a. On May 10, 2010, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution Number 10-068, adopting environmental findings pursuant to CEQA, certifying the Final EIR, adopting a statement of overriding considerations and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The General Plan specifically contemplated a revision and comprehensive update of the Development Code such as is accomplished by the Development Code Update and the Final EIR analyzed the impacts thereof. b. The Development Code Update does not propose substantial changes to the City's development regulations that were not analyzed in the Final EIR or that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The Project simply implements the goals and policies adopted in the City's General Plan and analyzed in the Final EIR. c. There have been no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Development Code Update is being undertaken that were not contemplated in the Final EIR or that will require major revisions of the Final EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The Final EIR that addressed the impacts of adopting the City's General Plan and revisions to the land development code was adopted on May 10, 2010. The existing conditions reported in the Final EIR are very similar to those currently in existence. Since adoption of the General Plan in 2010, the City has not processed any amendments to the plan. P416 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0.855 DRC2010-00571 -DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE July 18, 2012 Page 2 As a result, there are no substantial changes to the environment which would require a modification of the Final EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. d. There is no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Final EIR was certified that shows (a) the Development Code Update will have any significant effects not discussed in the Final EIR; (b) the significant effects examined in the Final EIR will be substantially more severe than previously shown; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found to be infeasible would now be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Development Code Update; or (d) considerably different mitigation measures or alternatives than those analyzed in the Final EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment are now available. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby adopts the comprehensive Development Code Update, attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference as Attachment 1. The Development Code attached as Attachment 1 completely replaces the City's existing Development Code and all provisions therein. SECTION 5: The City Council hereby adopts the Zoning Map as proposed in Attachment 2, attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 6: The City Council hereby adopts the Revisions to the Public Draft of the Development Code as proposed in Attachment 3, attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 7: The City Council hereby adopts the Additional Amendments as proposed in Attachment 4, attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 8: The provisions of this Ordinance, insofar as they are substantially the same as provisions of ordinances previously adopted by the City relating to the same matter, shall be construed as restatements and continuations of the earlier enactment, and not as new enactments. SECTION 9: The adoption of this Ordinance does not affect the following matters: Actions and proceedings that began before the effective date of this Ordinance. b. Prosecution for ordinance violations committed before the effective date of this Ordinance. c. Licenses and penalties due and unpaid at the effective date of this Ordinance. d. Collection of licenses and penalties due and unpaid at the effective date of this Ordinance. P417 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0.855 DRC2010-00571 -DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE July 18, 2012 Page 2 e. Bonds and cash deposits required to be posted, filed, or deposited pursuant to any ordinance, resolution, or regulation. f. Matters of record that refer to or are connected with an ordinance previously adopted by the City the substance of which is amended by this Ordinance. Such references shall be construed to apply to the corresponding provisions of this"Ordinance. SECTION 10: Any provision of the previously existing Development Code not included in the Development Code Update enacted by this Ordinance is hereby repealed. SECTION 11: Nothing in this Ordinance shall in any manner modify or otherwise affect the following subject matters: a. The corporate or jurisdictional limits of the City. b. Contracts to which the City is a party. c. City taxes. d. City franchises. Highways, roads, streets or other public right-of-way. Bonds or indebtedness of the City. A district, public corporation or other entity established by the City. Specific public improvements or assessments. Appropriation or investment of City funds SECTION 12: The Council hereby directs the City Clerk to make all necessary, non- substantive conforming revisions to the Municipal Code necessary to codify this Ordinance, including but not limited to clerical corrections to section numbers, table and figure references and cross references. SECTION 13: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 14: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a Summary of this Ordinance to be published within 15 days after its passage at least P418 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0.855 DRC2010-00571 -DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE July 18, 2012 Page 2 once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. P419 The Public Draft Development Code Update was distributed under separate cover to the Planning Commission on April 4,2012 Copies are available for review at: City Hall -Planning Department Archibald Library -Adult Reference Desk Victoria Gardens Library -Adult Reference Desk James L. Brulte Senior Center- Information Desk In addition, an electronic copy is available for viewing and download on our website at www.cityofrc.us/dcupdate ATTACHMENT 1 P420 - ~ a d N ~ ~ S ~ ~ 'C ~ $ Y u ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ p ~~e~ ~ wi~Z~~ ~ ~~ C ~ C~ O U d c ~r- U O O ~ =Y~~ ~ ~5~~ o ~c 0~~~ _ "~~ '° y ~ gg ~ m S a €~~~ i~~F ~ S Z a ~~93~ ~ a ~ i g '~ ~~E~~ v~ m E~$E ~£ ttrr ~ ~ F E nn n \`w IDIC~~I ~ ~ ~ J~~~ - - `\ F 6 1 F- i !B 1k k c L' p ~ ~ ~r_~ i, ~.T ~~ ~ . T.~l ...a... ~ei L"I . .,-,,, E ,..~ ~~ z t a° ~~ E ~s 0 +! ATTACHMENT 2 P421 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Staff is recommending the following revisions to the Public Draft Development Code Dated April, 2012. These amendments are shown in track changes as excerpts from relevant sections of the Public Draft Development Code with new language shown with underlined text and existing language to be removed shown with strike out text. Article II Land Use and Development Procedures Chapter 17.14 General Application Processing Procedures TABLE 17.14.060-1 APPROVING AUTHORITY FOR LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS Type of Permit or Decision Designated Approving Authority "R" _ "Recommending Body" "F" _ "Final Decision-Making Body" Planning Director Historic Preservation Commission Planning Commission City Council Official Code Interpretation F Plan CheckJZoning Clearance F Home Occupation Permit F Sign Permit F Temporary Use Permit F Tree Removal Permit F Uniform Sign Program F Similar Use Determination F Reasonable Accommodation F Site Development Review F Minor Exception F Conditional Use Permit F Minor Design Review F Hillside Development Review F Mills Act R R~ F Landmark Designation R R F Certificate of Appropriateness R F Certificate of Economic Hardship R F Entertainment Permit R F Major Design Review R F Variance R F Adult Entertainment Permit R F Tentative Subdivision Map (see Title 16) R F Planned Community R R F 1 ATTACHMENT 3 P422 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Typeof.Permit or Decision-.- DesignatedApprovingAUthority '1R" ="Recommending Body" "F" ="Final Decision:Making Body" Speck Plan R R F Prezoning R R F Zoning Code/Map Amendment R R F Development Agreement ~ R R F General Plan Amendment R R F Chapter 17.16 Planning Director Decisions Section 17.16.040 Home Occupation Permit A. Findings. A Home Occupation Permit shall be granted only when the Planning Director determines that the proposed home occupation complies with all of the following findings: 2. The proposed home occupation is consistent with the development standards for Home Occupations in Section 17.98.030 (Development Standards): and ~3The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the home occupation applied for will not, under the circumstances of the particular case (location, size, design, and operating characteristics), be detrimental to the health, safety, ^^ ^•^'~ ^^^~f^•', ^r general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such use or to the general welfare of the City. Section 17.16.130 Minor Design Review B. Applicability. Minor Design Review is required for commercial, industrial, institutional, and residential projects that meet any of the following qualifications: 4. Residential additions equal to or greater than fifty percent (50%) of the existing square footage. Chapter 17.20 Planning Commission Decisions Section 17.20.020 Entertainment Permit C. Exceptions. The provisions of this Chapter shall not be deemed to require a permit for any of the following: 5. Unamplified entertainmeht provided by no more than i+xa-four (4~) performers as an accessory use to •'~~•~^^ '^^^' °^ ^` an established restaurant business where dancing is not allowed. P423 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Section 17.20.150 Reasonable Accommodation A. Purpose and Intent. In accordance with Federal and State fair housing laws, it is the purpose of this Section to allow for reasonable accommodations in the City's zoning and land use regulations, policies, and practices when needed to provide an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. The intent is to alleviate the need for a Variance request for a reasonable accommodation . as described herein. B. Permit Application. 3. Other Discretionary Permits. If the project for which the request for reasonable accommodation is made requires another discretionary permit or approval, then the applicant may file the request for reasonable accommodation together with the application for the other discretionary permit or approval. The processing procedures of the discretionary permit shall govern the joint processing of both the reasonable-accommodation and the discretionary permit. As stated in the purpose and intent section, a Variance is not required for the reasonable accommodation. However, if the project includes a separate request to deviate from Citv standards unrelated to the accommodation, a Variance application may be required. C. Review Procedure. The Planning r^^~^^°'^^ Director is designated approval authority for reasonable accommodation requests and shall approve a reasonable accommodation request if the compliance requirements below are addressed. Conditions. The Plannina Director is authorized to approve or deny applications and to_impose reasonable conditions upon such approval, as the Director may deem necessary to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses, to preserve the public health, safety. and welfare. and to enable the Director to make the findings required by Section 17.16.150.D (Findings Chapter 17.22 City Council Decisions Section 17.22.020 Master Plan A. Purpose. The purpose of a Master Plan is to allow for the coordinated comprehensive planning of an subarea of the City in order to accomplish any of the following objectives: 4. To "plan ahead" and look beyond the limits of a particular property to solve c__irculation~drainage and neighborhood compatibility problems. 5. To provide flexibility for developments beyond conventional zoning regulations to address special or unique needs or characteristics. P424 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Article III Zoninct Districts, Allowed Uses. And Development Standards Chapter 17.24 Establishment of Zoning Districts Section 17.24.020 Zoning Districts Established TABLE 17.24.020-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ZONING DISTRICTS Zoning District Zoning District:'Name/Description Symbol it ~, Residential Zoning Districts, _ Very Low Residential. Designates areas for very low density residential use, with a VL minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and a maximum residential density of up to 2 units per gross acre. L Low Residential. Designates areas for single-family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet and a maximum residential density of 4 units per gross acre. Low-Medium Residential. Designates areas for low-medium density single-family or LM multiple-family use with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby single-family detached neighborhoods. Residential densities range from 4 to 8 units per gross acre maximum. Medium Residential. Designates areas for medium density multiple-family use, with site M development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 8 to 14 units per gross acre maximum. Medium-High Residential. Designates areas for medium-high density multiple-family use, MH `With site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 14 to 24 units per gross acre maximum. High Residential. Designates areas for high density multiple-family use, with site H development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 24 to 30 units per gross acre. - __ ____ __ -- _ Mixed Use4Zoning;District Mixed Use. Designates areas for a mix of residential and nonresidential uses, with site MU development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development, as well as internal compatibility among the varying uses. Commercial and Office Zoning'Distncts_= Office/Professional. Designates areas primarily for the development of OP professional/administrative offices and personal services rather than commodities. Site development regulations and performance standards are designed to make such uses relatively compatible with residential uses. Neighborhood Commercial. Designates areas for immediate day-to-day convenience NC shopping and services for the residents of the immediate neighborhood. Site development regulations and performance standards are intended to make such uses compatible to and harmonious with the character of surrounding residential or less intense land use area. 4 P425 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Zoning District Zoning Distric£Name/Description Symbol General Commercial. Designates areas for general commercial activities and services of a more intensive nature, including but not limited to major shopping facilities, major service- GC oriented uses, major financial, and corporate headquarters that are designed to serve the City or the region as a whole and are typically located primarily along major transportation routes. Community Commercial. Designates areas for commercial activities and services on a CC larger scale. Businesses are typically auto oriented and located along major commercial corridors. Specialty Commercial. Designates areas designed to enhance the character around historic resources or sites which promote a special landmark quality or create a special ambience. Examples include specialty theme-oriented uses located adjacent to the Thomas Brothers SC Winery, which complement the existing winery structure and provide a unifying theme or the establishment of tourist-oriented specialty uses iri other areas, which cater to visitors. A limited number of office uses have been included into the specialty commercial category in order to facilitate an interactive office/commercial environment. Regional Related Commercial. Designates areas for large-scale commercial development RRC that serves both local and regional needs. Sites are easily accessible from freeways and may contain a variety of goods and services, such as large-format retail, department stores, eating and drinking establishments, hotels, and motels. Commercial Office. Desionates areas for activities that cater to business support and CO personal services. Uses tvpically include medical and health care clinics travel aoencies insurance aoencies, copv centers and other similar land uses. 'Industrial Zoning`Districts Industrial Park. Designates areas for industrial firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment and a location which has prestige value. The district allows light IP industrial uses, office and administration facilities, research and development laboratories, and limited types of warehousing, as well as support businesses and commercial service uses. General Industrial. Designates areas for the widest possible range of light and medium GI industrial activity, including manufacturing,. assembling, fabrication, wholesaling, heavy commercial, and office uses. The district may be employed as a buffer between nonindustrial uses and heavy industrial uses. Minimum ImpacUHeavy Industrial. Designates areas for heavy industrial uses that will not MI/HI significantly impact the surrounding area including but not limited to, manufacturing, compounding, processing, fabrication, warehousing, storage, and freight handling. Heavy Industrial. Designates areas for heavy industrial uses including manufacturing, HI compounding, processing, fabrication, warehousing, storage, and freight handling. Use characteristics of this group include large structures to facilitate processing and open air storage of large amounts of raw or semi-refined products. Open Space Zoning Districts Open Space. Designates areas primarily to protect environmentally sensitive land. The use OS regulations, development standards, and criteria provide low intensity development and encourage recreational activities and preservation of natural resources. P426 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Zoning District Zoning DistricY'Name/Description Symbol Hillside Residential. Designates areas for maintaining natural open space character through protection of natural landforms; minimizing erosion; providing for public safety; protecting HR water, flora, and fauna resources; and establishing design standards to provide for limited development in harmony with the environment. Allowed density is a maximum of 2 units per net buildable acre as determined through the Hillside Development Review process. FC Flood Control .Designates areas necessary for flood control facilities for protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. UC Utility Corridor. Designates areas within utility corridors in which land uses compatible to both the utility function and surrounding, existing, or proposed land uses are allowed. ';=Special Purpose Zoning Districts Specific Plan. Designates areas for master planning through the adoption of a Specific Plan SP with unique land use and development standards far a particular project areas with a minimum of 300 acres. Planned Community. Designates areas master planning through the adoption of a Planned PC Community, which can establish unique land use and development standards for a particular project area: Planned Communities typically include less detail than Specific Plans and have no minimum project size requirement. Overlay'Zoning Districts = Senior Housing. Designates areas available for affordable rental housing units to serve the SH City's senior citizens. District provisions ensure high quality project design and establish incentives for ongoing affordability for this target group. This district can be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. Equestrian. Designates areas for the keeping of equine, bovine, and cleft-hoofed animals. Further, this district protects the ability to maintain such animals, promotes a "rural/farm" E character in an urban setting, and recognizes and encourages the educational and recreational values derived from raising and maintaining such animals. This district may be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. Foothill Boulevard. Designates areas along Foothill Boulevard for special use and development regulations to implement the goals and objectives in the General Plan for this FB important corridor that covers most of the length of Historic Route 66 through the City. Special regulations encourage a mix of uses, concentrate neighborhood, community, and regional-serving uses as appropriate, and accommodate future transit. Hillside. Designates sloped areas subject to special hillside development regulations. H Generally, this district applies to areas with a slope greater than or equal to 8%. This district may be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. HA Haven Avenue. Designates an area along Haven Avenue with unique allowed use regulations and development standards focused on high quality office opportunities. 4~'~^~treetlndustrial Commercial. Designates areas with an Industrial Park Base Zoning District to encourage and support the integration of traditional general commercial uses and 4SIC special development review requirements focused on retail opportunities.. Specifically. this - district includes the areas on the east side of Haven Avenue between Arrow Route and Civic Center Drive. southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. and the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Elm Avenue and Spruce Avenue. P427 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Chapter 17.30 Allowed Land Use by Base Zoning District Section 17.30.030 Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements E. Base Zoning District Names and Symbols. Base zoning district names for the zoning district symbols used in the table are listed below. Specific Plan (SP) District and Planned Community (PC) District are not listed in the table as the allowed uses for those base zoning districts are determined in compliance with the adopted Specific Plan or Planned Community. • Very Low Residential (VL) • Low Residential (L) • Low-Medium Residential (LM) • Medium Residential (M) • Medium-High Residential (MH) • High Residential (H) • Mixed Use (MU) • Office Professional (OP) • Neighborhood Commercial (NC) • General Commercial (GC) • Community Commercial (CC) • Specialty Commercial (SC) • Regional Related Commercial (RRC) • Commercial Office (CO) • Industrial Park (IP) • General Industrial (GI) • Minimum ImpacUHeavy Industrial (MI/HI) • Heavy Industrial (HI) • Open Space (OS) • Hillside Residential District (HR) • Flood Control-Open Space (FC) • Utility Corridor-Open Space (UC) TABLE 17.30.030-1 ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Land Use/Zoning ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ _: ~ ~ a O U z "i~ 't, U U V' ui U ~ OI O a O _ _ w 0 ~ x U a U' ~ District =- - ~ Residential lUses Adult Day Care p p p p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home - Caretaker C C C C C C C P P P N N N N C C C C P C P P Housing - Dwelling, Multi- N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Family - Dwelling, Second ~'~ P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Unit Dwelling, Single- p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Family - Dwelling, Two- N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Family - 7 P428 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code !Land Use2oning ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ x ' x. ~ a v U v v ~ O' I o. O s = O = a ~ ~ ~ g O z- (7 U rA ~ U ~ District Emergency N N N N N N N N N C N N ' N N N C N N N N N N Shelter - Family Day Care C C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N Home, Large - Family Day Care P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home, Small - Guest House P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Group C C C C C C C C C C C N C N N N N N N C N N Residential - Home (z) P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Occupation Live-Work N N N N N N P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility - Manufactured ~sl p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home - Mobile Home cs~ C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Park Residential Care N N N C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility - Residential Care P P P p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home - Single-Room Occupancy N N N P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Transitional p p p p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Housing - Agriculture and Animal Relateda Jses . Agricultural Uses N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Animal Keepin~4 P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Domestic Pets - Animal Keepingt4 C C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N Exotic Animals - Animal Keeping, t6~ P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Insects Animal Keeping, Livestock P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Animals t4I Animal Keeping, P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Poultry - Equestrian Facility, C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N C C Commercial Please see the following page for changes P429 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Land J x o. U U U U V O = rn re U o Use/Zoning > a 2 x 2 O z O o u, - c>� a O x O x LL District Equestrian P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility, Hobby Recreation, Resource Preservation,Open Space, Education,and Public Assembly Uses Assembly Use' C C C C C C NS N N N N N N N C C N N N N N N Cemetery/ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N Mausoleum — Community C C C C C C C C C C C C C C P P N N N C N N Center/CivicUse Community C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Garden Convention N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N N Center Golf Course/ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N C C Clubhouse — Indoor Amusement/Ente N N N N N N C N C C P P P N N N N N N N N N rtainment Facility Indoor Fitness andSports N N N N N N C C C C N C N C C C N N N N N N Facility- Large . Indoor Fitness andSports N N N N N N P P P P N C N P C C N N N N N N Facility-Small Library and C C C C C C P P P P N P N P C N N N C6 C C6 C6 Museum — Outdoor Commercial N N N N N N C C C C N N C C C C N N N N N N Recreation Park and Public P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Plaza — Public Safety C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N C N N Facility Resource- Related P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Recreation School, Academic C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N C N N (Private) School, Academic P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N P N N (Public) 9 Changes for P429 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Land J _ d O O O O V 0 = f O O Use/Zoning > E _ E O z 0 0 0 of a' O - = o x u. District Equestrian P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility. Hobby Recreation, Resource Preservation, Open Space, Education, and Public Assembly Uses Assembly Use C C C C C C N C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Cemetery/ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N Mausoleum Community C C C C C C C C C C C C C C P P N N N C N N Center/Civic Use — Community C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Garden — Convention N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N N Center Golf Course/ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N C C Clubhouse — Indoor Amusement/Ente N N N N N N C N C C P P P N N N N N N N N N rtainment Facility Indoor Fitness and Sports N N N N N N C C C C N C N C C C N N N N N N Facility - Large Indoor Fitness and Sports N N N N N N P PP P N C N F C C N N N N N N Facility - Small Library and C C C C C C P P P P N P N I-' C N N N C" C C` C'' Museum Outdoor Commercial N N N N N N C C C C N N C C C C N N N N N N Recreation Park and Public P P P P PP P N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Plaza Public Safety C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N C N N Facility Resource- Related P P P P PP P N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Recreation School, Academic C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N C N N (Private) School, Academic P P P P PP P P P P P P P P P P N N N P N N (Public) 9 P430 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Land Use2oning ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ x ~ ~' a O v z ;c~ (7 v U v uJ 0 ~ O U~ a (7 _ = m O ~ x ' O ~+ ~ ~ '+ District ~ ~ _ . - School, College/ University C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N C N N (Private) School, College/ University C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N C N N (Public) Schools, Specialized N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Education and - Training/Studio Theaters and N N N N N N C N N C N N P N N N N N N N N N Auditoriums - oeng Center - N N N N N N C C C C C # C C N N N N N N N N Lar 9 - Tutoring Center- N N N N N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N Small Al - Utility, Transportation,,Public''Facility, and Communication'Uses ____ Broadcasting and Recording N N N N N N N P N P N N N P P P N N N N N N Studios Park and Ride N N N N N N N C C C N N N N P P N N N N N N Facility - Parking.Facility N N N N N N P P N P C N C P C C C C N N C C Transit Facility N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C C N N N N Utility Facility and Infrastructure - N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C C C N C C Fixed Based - . Structures t5> Utility Facility and Infrastructure - P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Pipelines X51 Retail, Service,.and Offic e!Uses Adult Day Care N N N N N N C C C C N N N C C C N N N N N N Facility - Adult-Oriented B i i6l N N N N N N N N N 'N N N N N A A A A N N N N ness us Alcoholic N N N N N N C N C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Beverage Sales Ambulance N N N N N N N C C C N N N N N C P P N N N N Service - Animal Sales and N N N N N N P N P P N P N N N N N N N N N N Grooming - 10 P431 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Land UselZoning ~ > -i ~ ~ ~ x ~ _ ~ ~ a O v z O O v U v y a ~ O UI a - O = x w O ~ x ' v : u V' ~ . ~ _ District Art, Antique, N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Collectable Shop - Artisan Shop N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Bail Bonds N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Banks and Financial N N N N N N C C C P P P P P P P N N N N N N Services Bar/Nightclub N N N N N N C C N C C C C C N C N N N N N N e C C C N N N N N N N C # N N N N N N N N N N B eakfast Inn Building Materials Store N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N and Yard N N N N N N P P P P P ~ P P P P N N N N N N Support Services Call Centers N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N N N Card Room N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Check Cashing N N N N N N P N P P N N N N P N N N N N N N Business °~ - Child Day Care N N N N N N C C C C C N C C C C N N N N N N Facility/Center - ignment N N N N N N C N C C N ~ N N N N N N N N N N Store enience N N N N N N P N P P N ~ N N C C N N N N N N Store Cremator ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N Services - Drive-In and Drive-Through N N N N N N C C C C ~ N C C C C N N N N N N Sales and C - Service cep Equipment Sales N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C P P N N N N and Rental - Feed and Tack N N N N iJ N N N P P N N N N N N N N N N N N Store - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fumiture, Furnishing, and N N N N N N P N P P P # P N N N N N N N N N Appliance Store Garden Center/Plant N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N P N P P N P P Nursery 11 P432 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Land UselZonin J J ~ ~ x x ~, a V V U' U_ '~ O a` _ _ _ ,y ~ U V District Grocery Store/ N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N N N N N N N N Supermarket - Gun Sales N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Hookah Shop N N N N N N C N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Home Improvement N N N N N N P N P ' P P N P N C P N N N N N N Supply Store Hotel and Motel N N N N N N P C N P .N N C C P N N N N N N N Internet Cafe N N N N N N P P P P P ~ P P P N N N N N N N Kennel, N N N N N N N N N C C N C N C C N N N N N N Commercial - Liquor Store N N N N N N C N C C C ~ C N C C N N N N N N Maintenance and Repair, Small N N N N N N P N P P P N P P N P P C N N N N Equipment Massage N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Establishment M - Medical Marijuana N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Dispensary Medical P P P P P Services, N C C C C C C # N ~ ~ N N P - # ~ N N N N N N Extended Care Medical Services, N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P P N N N N N N General Medical Services, N N C C C C C C N C N N N N P P N N N N N N Hospitals Mobile Hot Food N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Trucks - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mortuary/Funeral N N N N N N N C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N Home - Office, Business N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N and Professional Pl - Office, Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P ~ P P P P N N N N N N Pawnshop. ~~~ N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Personal N N N N N N P P P P' P P P P P P N N N N N N Services - 12 P433 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code '.Land `' UselZoning ' ~ > '~ ~ J ~ `x :~ x ~' _ a O v z c~ r, v c ~ v N v ~ O al o. O = ' s O = a . ~ . c ~ District Restaurant, No N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Liquor Service - Restaurant, Beer N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N and Wine - Restaurant, Full N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Liquor Service - Retail, Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P N P P C C N N N N N N Retail, General N N N N N N P N P P P P P N C C N N N N N N Retail, N N N N N N P N N P P N P N P N N N N N N N Warehouse Club - Secondhand N N N N N N P N P P N N N N N N N N N N N N Dealer - Shooting Range N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N Specialty Food N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Store ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Smoke Shop ~'~ N N N N N N N N N C C N C N N N N N N N N N Tattoo Shop t't N N N N N N N N N C S N 6 N N N N N N N N N Thrift Store t'~ N N N N N N C N C C C N C N N N N N N N N N Veterinary C N N N N N C N P P C C C N N P P P N N N N Facility N - Automobile'and Vehicle~Uses Auto Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Dismantling - Auto and Vehicle N N N N" N N N C N C N N P N C C N N N N N N Sales and Rental . - Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N N N N N N N Autobroker Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P N N N N N N Sales, Wholesale - Autc and Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Storage - Auto Parts Sales N N N N N N N N P P N N P N N N N N N N N N Car Washing and N N N N N N N C C C N N C N N N N N N N N N Detailing - Recreational N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Vehicle Storage - Service Stations N N N N N N C C C P N N C C C C N N N N N N 13 P434 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Land Use2oning ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~. ^.x .g x; ~ ~' a O v z v' t7 v U v N v ~ O ' a - - ~ ' - = O x la ~ District U ~ Vehicle Services, N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C N C N N N N Major - Vehicle Services, N N N N N N N C C P N N C N P P N N N N N N Minor - _. _- -- - Industrial, Manufacturing, and.P.rocessing Uses _ k Fuel Storage and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N Distribution Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N Custom - Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N N N Heavy - Manufacturing, Heavy-Minimum N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Impact Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N Light - Manufact9ring, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P N N N N Medium - Printing and N N N N N N N N N P N N N N P P N N N N N N Publishing - Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N° P P P N N N N Collection Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Processing Recycling Facility, Scrap N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N and Dismantling - Facility Research and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N Development - Storage, Personal Storage N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Facility Storage N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C C C N N N N Warehouse - Storage Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Distribution - - Heavy 14 P435 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code !Land UselZonin9 'District ~ >- ~ ~ ~ ~: x ~ x ~ ,~ a O U z t1 C9 U V U w U ~ O UI a - t7 = ~ x O = LL ~ Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P N N N N Distribution - - Light Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Distribution - - Medium cBl Table Notes: (1) See additional regulations for second dwelling units in Chapter 17.106. (2) See additional regulations for home occupations in Chapter 17.98. (3) See additional regulations iw mobile homes in Chapter 17.102. (4) See Additional regulations for animal keeping in Chapter 17.90. (5) Utility facilities and infrastructure involving hazardous or volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (8) See additional regulations for adult entertainment businesses in Chapter 17.88. Adultoriented businesses are not permitted west of Haven Avenue. (7) See additional regulations for special regulated uses in Chapter 17.108.. (8) See additional regulations for dove-in and drive-through facilities in Chapter 17.92. (9) Not permitted within 300 feet of residentially zoned property Chapter 17.32 Allowed Use Descriptions Section 17.32.020 Allowed Use Descriptions B. Agriculture and Animal Related Uses Agricultural Uses. This use categoN includes farms orchards, vineyards, livestock grazing and hvdrooonics, including on site sales of products grown on site. C. Recreation, Resource Preservation, Open Space, Education, and Public Assembly Uses 6. Convention Center. A large building designed to hold a convention, where individuals and groups gather to promote and share common interests. Convention centers typically offer sufficient floor area to accommodate several thousand attendees. Convention centers typically have at least one auditorium and may also contain concert halls, lecture halls. meeting rooms. and conference rooms. Some large resort area hotels include a convention center. D. Retail, Service, and Office Uses 19. Consignment Store. A retail store where ponds are placed on consignment. which is the act of placing goods in the hands of another, while still retaining ownership. until the goods are sold. 15 P436 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code 23. Feed and Tack Stores. A retail store selling animal food and equestrian supplies. 24. Home Improvement Supply Store. An establishment (retail or wholesale) that sells kitchen, bath, f,,.^'^'Tcarpeting, and other home-oriented supplies. Other retail uses are permitted if accessory to the primary use. These uses may include an expansive showroom. This use classification is a subcategory of the larger Building Materials Stores and Yards use classification and may be combined with or separate from such uses. 40. Mobile Hot Food Truck. Anv vehicle as defined in 6670 of the California Vehicle Code, which is equipped and used for retail sales of prepared. prepackaged or unprepared unpackaged food or foodstuffs of anv kind. For the purposes of this section. a mobile food vehicle shall also include anv trailer or wagon equipped and used as described in this paragraph and pulled by a vehicle. 45. Personal Services. Establishments providing nonmedical services as a primary use, including, but not limited to, barber and beauty shops includin permanent makeup), weight loss clinics day spa spiritualist reading or astrology forecasting. clothing rental, dry cleaning pickup stores with limited equipment, home electronics and small appliance repair, Laundromats (self- service laundries), shoe repair shops, and tailors. These uses may also .include accessory retail sales of products related to the services provided. This use classification does not include massage or tattoo establishments, which are separately classified herein. 46. ; Restaurant. A retail business selling food and beverages prepared and/or served on the site, for on- or off-premise consumption. Includes eating establishments where customers are served from awalk-up ordering counter for either on- or off-premise consumption and establishments where most customers are served food at tables for on-premise consumption, but may include providing food for take-out. Also includes coffee houses and accessory cafeterias as part of office and industrial uses. Restaurants are divided into four categories as follows: i. Restaurant~it--Bewa, No Liquor Service. Restaurants that do not serve liquor, including fast food establishments. ii. Restaurant~it-Bewa, Beer and Wine. Restaurants with liquor services limited to beer and wine for on-site consumption. iii. Restaurant~it--Bewra, Full Liquor Service. Restaurants with a full range of liquor service, including beer, wine, and distilled spirits, all for on-site consumption. 47. Retail, General. Stores and shops selling single and multiple lines of merchandise. These stores and lines of merchandise include, but are not limited to, bakeries (all production in support of on-site sales), clothing and accessories, collectibles, department stores, drug and discount stores, dry goods, fabrics and sewing supplies, florists and houseplant stores (indoor 16 P437 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code sales, only; outdoor sales are plant nurseries and included in the definition of Garden Center/Plant Nursery), ' ~^ + ~ ~^^~° ' ~ °~ ^^° ^^'' °^+ general stores, gift shops, hardware, hobby materials, musical instruments, parts and accessories, newsstands, pet supplies specialty shops, sporting goods and equipment, stationery, and variety stores. a-52. Specialty Food Store. A store selling specialty food ingredients, which typically preserve, texture, emulsify. colour, help processing and in some cases add an extra health dimension to produced food. Chapter 17.34 General Development Standards Section 17.34.040 Setback Requirements and Exceptions Front Yards. Generally, the front yard setback is determined by the front lot line,. which is the lot line paralleling the street. However, for flag lots and other irregularly shaped parcels, the front lot line is determined to be the narrowest portion of the lot. For flag lots, this excludes the narrow portion of the lot that represents the "pole". See Figure 17.34.040-1 (Front Yard Setback Measurement for Irregular Lots). Figure 17.34.0406 Front Yard Setback Measurement for Irregular Lots Front L.ot Line - Narrowest Portion of the Lot ~__J Street Flag Lot ~~ FRONTYARD SETS Front Lot Line Narrowest Portioi of the Lo Street Irregular Lot Allowed Encroachments or Projections Into Required Yards. In addition to the structures listed in Section 17.42 (Accessory Structures) and Section 17.50 (Fences, Walls, and Screening), the following structures and architectural features attached to the main building may project into the required yards: Residential Encroachments ii. Replaseraeat-cChimneys, bay windows, balconies, media centers, fire escapes, exterior stairs and landings, and similar architectural features may project into required yards a maximum distance of two feet (2'), provided such features shall be at least three feet (3') from a property line. 17 Please see the following page for changes P438 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Chapter 17.36 Development Standards by Base Zoning District Section 17.36.010 Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts TABLE 17.36.010-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/ VL L LM M MH H Zoning District Lot Area(minimum) 20,000 sf 7.200 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) Lot Area(minimum net avg) 22,500 sf 8,000 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) Lot Width(minimum) 90 ft(2) 65 ft(2) 50 ft(2) n/a n/a n/a Lot Width(corner lot) 100 ft 70 ft 50 ft n/a n/a n/a Lot Depth (minimum) 200 ft 100ft 90 ft n/a n/a n/a Minimum Frontage 50 ft 40 ft 30 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Minimum Frontage (flag lot) 30 ft 20 ft 20 ft 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft Allowed Density(dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density(3) n/a n/a 4 du/ac 8 du/ac 14 du/ac 24 du/ac 1 8 du/ac 14 du/ac Maximum Density 2 du/ac 4 du/ac 02 24 du/ac 30 du/ac Minimum Setback Front Yard(4) 42 ft(5) 37 ft(5) 32 ft(5) 37 ft 151 n/a n/a Corner Side Yard (4) 27 ft 27 ft 22 ft 27 ft n/a n/a Interior Side Yard (4) 10/15 ft 5/10 ft 5/10 ft 10 ft(6) n/a n/a Rear Yard(4) 60 ft 20 ft 15 ft 10 ft(6) n/a n/a At Interior Site Boundary (Dwelling/Accessory NR t 111 15/5(6) 15/5(6) 15/5(6) Building) Building Height(maximum in feet)01 Primary Buildings 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft(6) 40 ft(8) 55 ft(8) Lot Coverage(maximum lot coverage with buildings as a percentage of the parcel or project) Lot Coverage 25% 40% 50% 50% 50% 50% Floor Area Ratio (maximum) Floor Area Ratio 38 50.37 35%0_6 35°%0/5 35%0.75 /10%N/A €0%N/A Open Space Requirement(minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Private Open Space 300/150 225/150 150/100 150/100 (Ground Floor/Upper Story) sf sf sf sf Open Space/Landscape and 65% 60% 40% 35% 35% 35% Area(Private an Common 40/% 18 Changes for P438 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Chapter 17.36 Development Standards by Base Zoning District Section 17.36.010 Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts TABLE 17.36.010-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/ vL L LM M MH H Zoning District Lot Area(minimum) 20,000 sf 7.200 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) Lot Area (minimum net avg) 22,500 sf 8,000 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) Lot Width (minimum) 90 ft(2) 65 ft(2) 50 ft(2) n/a n/a n/a Lot Width (corner lot) 100 ft 70 ft 50 ft n/a n/a n/a Lot Depth (minimum) 200 ft 100ft 90 ft n/a n/a n/a Minimum Frontage 50 ft 40 ft 30 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Minimum Frontage(flag lot) 30 ft 20 ft 20 ft 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft Allowed Density(dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density (3) n/a n/a 4 du/ac 8 du/ac 14 du/ac 24 du/ac 8 du/ac 14 du/ac Maximum Density 2 du/ac 4 du/ac flat 111) 24 du/ac 30 du/ac Minimum Setback Front Yard(4) 42 ft(5) 37 ft(5) 32 ft(5) 37 ft(5) n/a n/a Corner Side Yard(4) 27 ft 27 ft 22 ft 27 ft n/a n/a Interior Side Yard (4) 10/15 ft 5/10 ft 5/10 ft 10 ft(6) n/a n/a Rear Yard (4) 60 ft 20 ft 15 ft 10 ft(6) n/a n/a At Interior Site Boundary . (Dwelling/Accessory NR (11) 15/5(6) 15/5(6) 15/5(6) Building) Building Height(maximum in feet)(7) Primary Buildings 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft 181 40 ft(8) 55 ft(8) Lot Coverage (maximum lot coverage with buildings as a percentage of the parcel or project) Lot Coverage 25% 40% 50% 50% 50% 50% Floor Area Ratio 30% 35% 35% 35% 40% 50% Open Space Requirement(minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Private Open Space 300/150 225/150 150/100 150/100 (Ground Floor/Upper Story) sf sf sf sf Open Space/Landscape 65% 60% 40% 35% 35% ° Area(Private and Common 35/o Minimum Patio/Porch Depth 6' (14) 6'(14) 6' (14) 6' (14) 6' (14) 6' (14) 18 P439 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Development Standard/ Zoning District=. VL L LM - M MH li ' Minimum PatiolPorch Deoth 6' ltal 6' t14I 6' i14I 6' 114j 6' f'al 6' I/4I Minimum'Dwelling Unit Size`19~ Single-Family (attached and detached) 1,000 sf Multi-Family t70I 550 sf Effciency/Studio 650 sf One Bedroom 800 sf Three or More Bedrooms 950 sf Distance'''Between BuildingslStructures Fronts I" I" (minimum). 35 ~5 ~5 15 Between buildings with no patio or recessed patio _ _ 30 30 30 30 Between patiofence/wallless 'than 5 feet in height _ _ 15 15 15 15 Between patio fence/wall more than 5 feet in height _ _ 20 20 20 20 Between balconies above patio ' fence/wall more than 5 feet in - - 20 20 20 20 height Between a patio fence/wall and a building wall _ _ 20 20 20 20 With common patio fence/wall - - 30 30 30 30 Other'Miscellaneous=Building Setback'R eguiremen# s t"I (minimum) Building to one-story detached garage/carport orother - 6-fF 6-ft 6 ft/15 ft 15 ft 15 ft 15 ft accessory structure Buildino to wall or curb at 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft pf01ECt Entry ~ - Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record, parcels less than 3 acres w less than the required minimum /rontage may only be developed at the /owes! end of the permitted density range. (2) Average width, which shall vary accordingly: VL - +/- f 0 /eat L 8 LM - +/_ 5 feet. (3) Excluding land necessary for secondary streets and artena/s and in hillside areas shall be dependent on the slope/capacity factor contained in Chapter 17.52 (Hillside Development Standards). (4) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in /root yards and comer side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and intedor side yards. (5) Front yard setbacks in new residential developments may be reduced by up to five feet to allow for variation in structural setbacks along the street. (5) Add f 0 feet if adjacent to VL, L, or LM district. (7) In hillside areas, heights shall be limited to 30 /eet. (8) Limit one story within 100 teat of VL or L district /ormultiple-family dwellings. (g) Senior citizen projects are exempted from this requirement. (f0) To assure that smaller units are not concentrated in any one area w project, the following percentage limitations of the total number of units sha/I apply: f0'~ /or e>Cciency/studio and 35% for one bedroom or up to 35% combined. Subject to a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission may authorize a greater ratio o/ eKciency or one-bedroom units when a development exhibits innovative design qualities and a balanced mix of unit sizes and types. 19 P440 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code to buildings two stories and taller in height. Add f0 more (eet for each story over two stories. Standards for Higher Residential Densities. Table 17.36.010-2 establishes minimum development standards for higher density residential projects in the Low- Medium {LM) and Medium Development Districts (M1. Specifically multi-family applications in the LM district and single-family applications in the M district that propose the maximum density allowed in each respective district shall comply with the special development standards listed in Table 17.36.010-2 below. 20 P441 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code TABLE 17.36.010-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR HIGHER RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES Optional_Dedelopment Standards! Zonfng District LM - M - MH - H - Minimum Site Area (Gross) 5 ac Sac Sac Sac Dwelling Units Per Acre Up 10 8 Up to 14 Uo to 24 Up to 30 Minimum Dwelling Unit Size Single-Family and Multi-Family See Table 17.36.010-1 42 ft A 42 ft A 42 ft Avq. 47ft A Public Street Setback vq. V 5ft +/ vq. V 5ft +/ Varv +/-5 vq. +l V 5 ft arv - arv - ft arv - 15 ft Avq. Private Street or Driveway Setback Varv +/- 5 5ft 5ft 5 ft ft Corner Side Yard 10 ft 5ft _ _ Interior Side Yard 10 ft I'I1~1 Interior Site Boundary 15/5 ft 20/5 ft nt 20/5 ft i't 20/5 ft I't (Dwelling UnitlAccessory Building) Residential Building Separations See Table 17.36.010-1 Height Limitations 35 ft 13t 35 ft t't 40 ft t't 55 ft I't Private Ogen Space 150/100 (Ground Floor/Upper Story) 300/150 sf 225/150 sf sf 150/100 sf Ooen Space (Private and Commonl 45% 40% 40% 40% Minimum PatiolPorch Depth 6 ft I<t 6 ft I4I 6 ft tot 6 ft tot Recreation Facility Required Per Section 17.132.040 !1) Add 10 feel if adjacent to VL L or LM district. !2) Zero lot line dwellings permitted pursuant to Section 17.36.010 D. (31 Limit one story within 100 fee of VL or L District (or multi-family dwelling units. (4) Free and clear of obstructions. G. Special Streetscape. It is the intent of this Section to create streetscaoe standards for landscape, building, and parking setbacks that help to identify the function of streets and to improve the scenic ouality of the community. Table 17.36.020-3 sets forth the minimum setbacks based upon street classification in the General Plan Circulation Plan. These setbacks shall be required of all new developments that contain or abut any one of the street classifications listed in the table. Setbacks shall be measured from the face of the ultimate curb location. 21 P442 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code TABLE 17.36.020-3 RESIDENTIAL STREETSCAPE SETBACK STANDARDS L U Building Parkind Landscape and and se and Street Classification ~~ Setback Setback- WaII Setba Detached Single Familv Residential 20 ft averaoe Maior/Special Boulevard 45 ft 18 ft 18 ft minimum 18 ft average Secondarv/Collector 35 ft 15 ft 15 ft minimum Attached Single Familv Residential and Multi Familv Residential 45 ft average Maior/Special Boulevard 45 ft 30 ft Izl 30 ft minimum 35 ft averace Secondarv/Collector 35 ft 25 ft tzl 25 ft minimum Figure 17.36.020-1 Special Streetscape Setback for Single Familv Residential 22 P443 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Streetscape Setback Requirements for Major/Special Boulevards ~', (~ `_ L Streetscape Setback Requirements for Secondary/Collectors. 23 ~.. ~.~~~~~~~~..~~~ ~ .v ~ - w nvo ayci io rvw nu ~uu~ Building Setback Parking Setback Landscape and Wall Setback ~.~~~~~~~~ ~~~ uuui - io nvo ayci a rvm un mui Building Setback Parking Setback Landscape and Wall Setback P444 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code lure 17.36.020-2 Special Streetscaae Setbacks for Multi Familv Residential Streetscape Setback Requirements for Major/Special Boulevards .,~ ;~ ~. J + i~r~ ~' ~~ - 1 ~:. ~~ ..1 '?'T Y f ^~' V ~ ~~R 45'Minimum ~30'Minimum I-45'Average/ Building Setback Parking'Setback 30'Minimum Landscape and WaIlSetback Streetscape Setback Requirements for Secondary/Collectors 24 Building Setback Parking Setback 25'Minimum Landscape and WaIlSetback P445 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Section 17.36.030 Development Standards for Commercial and Office Zoning Districts H. Commercial Streetscage Setbacks. Table 17.36.030-2 sets forth the minimum setbacks for buildings and parking facilities, as well as the amount of the setback to be landscaped. Setbacks apply equally to atl commercial districts based upon street classification in the General Plan Circulation Plan. These setbacks shall be required of all new developments that contain or abut any one of the street classifications listed in the table. TABLE 17.36:030-2 COMMERCIAL STREETSCAPE SETBACK STANDARDS s Building PaFking Landscape and Land Use and Street Clas ification ' Setback Setback Wall Setback Street yard setback (measured from face of curb) Maior/Special Boulevard 45 ft - 30 ft 45 ft average 30 ft minimum Secondary Collector Streets/Local Streets 35 ft 25 ft 35 ft average - 25 ft minimum Rear Progertv Line Setback Adiacent to existing or planned residential development 20 ft 10 ft 10 ft - Adiacent to other existing or planned commercial or industrial development 0 - 0 - 0 - Interior Side Property Line Setback Adiacent to existing or planned residential development 20 ft 10 ft 10 ft - Adiacent to other existing or planned commercial or industrial development 5ft 5ft 5 ft - (1) On existino lots of record. parcels less than 175 feet in depth need not provide a setback of landscapino greater than 20 percent of the depth of the property lexcludino right-of--way). 25 P446 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Figure 17:36.030-1 Special Commercial Streetscape Setbacks Streetscape Setback Requirements for Major/Special Boulevards 45'Minimum 30'Minimum Building Setback, Parking5etback-i Landscapes Streetscape Setback Requirements for Secondary Collector Streets/ Local Streets 35'Minimum 25'Minimum Building Setback-~ Parking Setback -i Landscape Setb~ Section 17.36.040 Development Standards for Industrial Districts D. Other Miscellaneous Industrial Development Standards. 5. Outdoor Eating Area. Employee outdoor eating areas shall be provided as an integral part of site design. 26 45' Average/30' Minimum 35' Average/25' Minimum P447 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Chapter 17.38 Overlay Zoning Districts Section 17.38.020 Equestrian Overlay Zoning District B. District Boundaries. The "^'^~' "^'^••• ~'^^'^^^'^~' ••"" ^^district boundaries for the Equestrian Overlay Zoning District are Banvan Street from West City boundary to Milliken Avenue, South to CA 210 to 115 to the east and along the entire northern boundary fo the sphere of influence. Section 17.38.040 Haven Overlay Zoning District TABLE 17.38.040-1 ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT Land UselZoning District 'HA Recreation,;Resource'Preservation, Open Space, Education, and PublicAssembly_Uses Assembly Use C Community Center/Civic Use P Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility -Large C Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility -Small C Park and Public Plaza C Public Safety Facility C School, Academic (Private) C School, Academic (Public) C School, College/ University (Private) C School, College/ University (Public) C Schools, Specialized Education and Training/Studio C Utility, Transportation, Public Facility, and Communicatioo-Lses Broadcasting and Recording Studios P Park and Ride Facility P Parking Facility C Transit Facility C Utility Facility and Infrastructure -Pipelines I'I P 27 P448 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Land'Use2oning District HA Retail, Secvice,and Office Uses , Alcoholic Beverage Sales C Banks and Financial Services P Business Support Services P Call Centers C Child Day Care Facility/Center C Convenience Store C Furniture, Furnishing, and Appliance Store C Hotel and Motel p Massage Establishment P Medical Services. General P Office, Business and Professional P Office, Accessory P Restaurant, No Liquor Service P Restaurant, Beer and Wine P Restaurant, Full Liquor Service C __ +Automobile and Vehicle Uses ' ' Car Washing and Detailing C Service Stations fzl.1't C Table Notes: (1) Utility facilities and infrastructure involving hazardous w volatile gas and/w liquid pipeline development require approval o/ a Conditional Use Permit. (2) Service Stations are prohibited within 800 feet o/ the Foothill Boulevard/Haven Avenue and the 4`" StreeUHaven Avenue intersections. No service station shall be closer than Y mile o/another Service Station as measured from the nearest property line. (3) Service Stations shall be designed to reflect the architecfuralstandards and guidelines within the Haven Avenue Overlay DisMCt. No corporate prototype" architecture design will be permitted. Service stations are only permitted when designed as part of, and designed consistent with, profession once complexes. Section 17.38.050 4u'~treetlndustrial Commercial Overlay Zoning District _ C. Purpose. The purpose of the 4t#t-~treetlndustrial Commercial Overlay District is to establish unique allowed use provisions and project compatibility requirements for e ~ C4mnk Lnfi..nn.. L.in.n4..1 7G ..n.l ~A'il'L•..n A..nn ~,~~~~,e nareas of the City where both industrial park and retail development where-are compatible. D. Applicability. The 4~'-Streetlndustrial Commercial Overlay Zoning District applies to property designated on the Zoning Map by reference letters "IC4S" after the reference letter(s) identifying the base zoning district. E. Allowed Use. Allowed uses for the 4'~~eetlndustrial Commercial Overlay Zoning District are listed below in Table 17.38.050-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements for 4~'~#reetlndustrial Commercial Overlay Zoning District). Generally, 28 Please see the following page for changes P449 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code a use is either allowed by right, allowed through issuance of a conditional use permit, or not permitted. In the table below, a land use shown with a "P" indicates that the land use is permitted by right in the designated zoning district, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this Title (e.g., development standards) as well state and federal law. Additionally, a land use shown with a "C" indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of a Conditional Use Permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this Zoning Code (e.g., development standards) as well as state and federal law. Uses not listed in the table are not permitted. In the event of a conflict between the allowed uses for this district and the allowed uses of the underlying base zoning district, the allowed uses for this district shall apply. TABLE 17.38.050-1 ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR C STREETINDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT Land Use/Zoning District I 4SIC Residential Uses Caretaker Housing C Emergency Shelter C Group Residential C Recreation, Resource Preservation, Open Space, Education, and Public Assembly Uses Assembly Use NC Community Center/Civic Use p Indoor Amusement/Entertainment Facility C Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility- Large C Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility- Small C Library and Museum C Outdoor Commercial Recreation C Public Safety Facility C School, Academic(Private) C School, Academic(Public) p School, College/University(Private) C School, College/University(Public) C Schools, Specialized Education and Training/Studio C Theaters and Auditoriums C Tutoring Center- Large C Tutoring Center- Small P Utility,Transportation, Public Facility,and Communication Uses Broadcasting and Recording Studios P Park and Ride Facility C Parking Facility P Utility Facility and Infrastructure—Pipelines(1) Retail, Service, and Office Uses 29 Changes for P449 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code a use is either allowed by right, allowed through issuance of a conditional use permit, or not permitted. In the table below, a land use shown with a "P" indicates that the land use is permitted by right in the designated zoning district, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this Title (e.g.. development standards) as well state and federal law. Additionally, a land use shown with a "C" indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of a Conditional Use Permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this Zoning Code (e.g., development standards) as well as state and federal law. Uses not listed in the table are not permitted. In the event of a conflict between the allowed uses for this district and the allowed uses of the underlying base zoning district, the allowed uses for this district shall apply. TABLE 17.38.050-1 ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR 4;" T�TREETINDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT Land Use/Zoning District l 4SIC Residential Uses Caretaker Housing C Emergency Shelter C Group Residential C Recreation, Resource Preservation, Open Space, Education, and Public Assembly Uses Assembly Use C - Community Center/Civic Use P Indoor Amusement/Entertainment Facility C Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility - Large C Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility - Small C Library and Museum C Outdoor Commercial Recreation C - Public Safety Facility C School, Academic (Private) C School, Academic (Public) P School, College/ University (Private) C School, College/University (Public) C Schools. Specialized Education and Training/Studio C Theaters and Auditoriums C Tutoring Center- Large C Tutoring Center- Small P Utility, Transportation, Public Facility, and Communication Uses Broadcasting and Recording Studios P Park and Ride Facility C Parking Facility P Utility Facility and Infrastructure— Pipelines (1" Retail, Service, and Office Uses 29 P450 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Land Lse/Zoning District 4SIC Adult Day Care Facility C Alcoholic Beverage Sales C Ambulance Service C Animal Sales and Grooming P Art, Antique, Collectable Shop P Artisan Shop P Banks and Financial Services P Bar/Nightclub C Business Support Services P Call Centers C Check Cashing Business (x~ P Child Day Care Facility/Center C Consignment Store C Convenience Store C Drive-In and Drive-Through Sales and Service Isl C Equipment Sales and Rental C Furniture, Furnishing, and Appliance Store P Garden Center/Plant Nursery P Grocery Store/ Supermarket P Gun Sales C Hookah Shop C Home Improvement Supply Store C Hotel and Motel P Internet Cafe P Kennel, Commercial C Liquor Store C Maintenance and Repair, Small Equipment P Massage Establishment P Medical Services, General P Medical Services, Hospitals C Mortuary/Funeral Home C Office, Business and Professional P Office, Accessory P Pawnshop Iz) C Personal Services P Restaurant, No Liquor Service P Restaurant, Beer and Wine P Restaurant, Full Liquor Service C Retail, Accessory P 30 P451 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code land Use2oning District 4SIC Retail, General P Retail, Warehouse Club P Secondhand Dealer P Smoke Shop czl C Tattoo Shop tz> C Thrift Store tz) C Veterinary Facility P __ Automdbile and'vehicle Lsea _-- -.- _ - Auto and Vehicle Sales and Rental C Auto and Vehicle Sales, Autobroker P Auto and Vehicle Sales, Wholesale P Auto Parts Sales P Car Washing and Detailing C Service Stations C Vehicle Services, Major C Vehicle Services, Minor P `Industrial,-.Manufacturing, and Processing U_ ses - - Printing and Publishing P Recycling Facility, Collection P Storage Warehouse C Table Notes: (1) Utility /acilities and infrastructure involving hazardous or volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval o/ a Conditional Use Permit. (2) See additional regulations (or special regulated uses in Chapter 17.108. (3) See additionalregulations /or drive-in and drive-through /acilities in Chapter 17.92. F. Project Compatibility. Retail development within the 4`"~$eetlndustrial Commercial Overlay Zoning District .shall be compatible with adjacent existing and intended Industrial Park .and General Industrial development through proper site planning, building design, and landscaping. As such, aMaster-Plan is required consistent with Chapter 17.22. 31 P452 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Article IV Site Development Provisions Chapter 17.42 Accessory Structures FIGURE 17.42.040-1 SETBACK MEASUREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES � Front Property Line Front Property Line Front Property Line •FrontYard 7 IFrontYard •Front Yard Setback (Setback ;Setback C ar Y + Y C i a l 1 Y ' C C Y v � a d , c VI .- y.l a y a ' c ;a ; c a - a ✓+ V J« W N v Primary Primary a v Primary c o 'F''''' m... Building o Building a, Building i: o ' V ° O e a. � 4 Ti OI a 112 Z – N • 30%Max X • 1 30%Max N I _ A. ; Rear Yard Lot / \ : Rear Yard Lot L3�± _J Coverage L J Coverage L _`, J Rear Property Line Rear Property Line Rear Property Line Solid Roof Structure Solid Roof Structure, Open Roof Structure Maximum 6'Tall Front Property Line Front Property Line r IFrontYard 7 I IFront Ya rd 7 (Setback Setback l �c a �e C Y v C -. � 1 2 a -+ $ a Z: 5, C >. C N J a 'J P Primary m o. i Primary L` a > Building 2 > d A Building E .s i N 0 a 'a 7 V ,n 4 a N I a �� ® �N "'I.,: . • —1 30%Max Rear Yard Lot L ut ____I L _ _, J Coverage Rear Property Line Rear Property Line Water Feature Pools/Spas 1I 32 P453 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code TABLE 17.42.040-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Minimum SetbacKDistance Maximum Accessory from Property'Line orOther Structures Rear Yard Max'vntun' Structure (Type) Street :Prima ry Lot Height Front Rear Side Side Yard Building Coves ett~l ' 9 Solid Roof Not 5 ft.t+l ft.t+5z ~ Not permitted I+l~~t 30% required 16 ft. Structure permitted al yard area Open Roof Not 5 ft. 5 ft.u Not (,I(_saf n/a ~-'~/ 16 ft. Structure permitted permitted Water Features NO 3 ft. 5 ft. Not No n/a 16 ft. minimum permitted minimum Pools/spas Not 5 ft ~-~+f 5 ft.~-°4f Not No 30% required 5 ft. permitted permitted minimum yard area Pool Accessories Not 5 ft. 5 ft. Not No 30% required n/a permitted permitted minimum yard area Play Equipment ~ 5 ft. 5 ft. N n/a n/a pe m tted permitted min mum Deck/Patio ~ 5 ft. 5 ft. Not No n/a n/a a m tted p permitted minimum Outdoor Not Not No Entertainment permitted 5 ft. 5 ft. permitted minimum n/a n/a Features Temporary, Portable Shade Not 5 ft. 5 ft. Not t+y~a> 30% required 10 ft Structures ermitted p permitted yard area . (1) Accessory buildings not exceeding 6 feet in height at the highest point may be built to the side and/or rear property line, provided that the accessory structure ie:+~37-less-tpan-6-fesFaameets minimum buildino code requirements for distance between the accessory structure kem-and the primary building. (2) The 5 (pot side vard setback reouirement ror solid and open roof structures applies when the structure is located within the rear (32) For reverse comer lots, the street side yard setback shall be the same as (42) Accessory Structures with solid roofs that are less than 6 )eet fall and 12 L5~NO minimum setback required. Accessory buildings may be attached to and have a common wall with the main building or, when located as required by this chapter, maybe connected to the main building by a breezeway. (fi4) Measurement from water's edge. Related equipment shall be set back a minimum of 5 feet from all side and rear property lines. (75) Accessory structure shall not exceed the overall lot coverage limitation for the property (see Chapter 17.36). (66) Trellis type and open roo/structures are exempt Irom lot coverage calculations. 33 P454 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Figure17.42.040-2 Special Setbacks for Accessory Structures in Rear Yards front Property Line v o. c !T T mi `y o°-. Primary ~ v ~. Building ~ a Vf N Bulldable Area - ±: Buildable Area Within the -- - - .Rear Yard Setback Area Solid and OpenRoof Structures Located Outside of the Rear Yard Setback Area are Required to Maintain the Same Side Yard i Setback as the Primary Strutture. ti' _---~ Solid and Open Roof Structures Located Within the Rear Yard Setback Area are RearProperty Line Required to Maintaina5'Side VardSetback. Chapter 17.48 Fences, Walls, and Screening FIGURE 17.48.030-2 MEASUREMENT OF FENCE AND WALL HEIGHT ON PARCELS WITH DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS Chapter 17.50 Green Building Section 17.50.020 Applicability C. All municipal projects undertaken by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, shall: 2. For all buildings over 7.500 square feet 1a~plea3eat-all of the Tier 1 provisions of the CalGreen Building Code shall be implemented or ashievc~100 points shall be achieved based on the optional provisions of the "City of Rancho Cucamonga, Green Building Code Compliance Matrix (Non-residential)." 34 P455 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Section 17.50.030 Incentives B. RC Green 200. All buildings achieving CalGreen Tier 2 or 200 points or more on the relevant Green Building Code Compliance Matrix as maintained by the Planning Director shall be eligible for: 4. Reduction in tlaa-one site development standards or architectural design requirements, including but not limited to: Chapter 17.54 Uses in Historic Structures A. Puraose. Existing. historical landmarks and focal points, which have been recognized by the City as having historical significance are encouraged to be enhanoed through physical improvements. The purpose of this Chapter is to identify allowed uses for historic structures in residential districts. See additional regulations for historic resources can be found in Chapter 17.18 (Historic Preservation Commission Decisions). B. Allowed Uses. Historical structures within a residential district may be used for uses other than residential with approval of a Conditional Use Permit based upon the following criteria: 1. Proposed use shall not cause intensification or disruption to any adjacent uses or neighborhood. bookstore. or florist. Chapter 17.58 Landscape Standards Section 17.58.040 Landscape Plan Review Process A. Landscaping Plans Subject to Review. When the requirements of this Chapter are applicable as established in Section 17.58.020 (Applicability), the following landscape plan review process shall be conducted in conjunction with design review for the proposed action, pursuant to the requirements of Section 17.16.140 (Design Review). 5. Approving Authority. The designated approving authority shall be the same as the designated approving authority of the entitlement for new projects or existing development as identified in Section 17.58.020 (Applicability). For projects in the wildland-urban interface area, the Fire Chief is an additional approving authority. 35 P456 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Section 17.58.050 General Landscape Development Standards Plant Type. Landscape planting shall emphasize drought-tolerant and native species (especially along natural, open space areas), shall complement the architectural design of structures on the site, and shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions specific to the site. In the wildland-urban interface fire area. planting shall emphasize wildfire hazard reduction. 4. In the wildland-urban interface fire area. plant types shall not include those identified as fire Drone or those types that are specifically prohibited by the Fire District. C. Planting Size, Spacing; and Planter Widths. In order to achieve an immediate effect of a landscape installation and to allow sustained growth of planting materials, minimum plant material sizes, plant spacing, and minimum planter widths (inside measurements) are as follows: 4. In the wildland-urban interface fire area. size. spacing clustering and arrangement shall conform to Fire District requirements. Section 17.58.060 Special Landscape Requirements In addition to the general requirements of Section 17.58.050 (General Landscape Development Standards), the feRevviag-requirements listed below apply to the special types of landscaping, However, in the wildland-urban interface fire area. the Fire District requirements preclude the application of these special types of landscaping. M. Parking Lot Landscape. Parking lot landscape includes perimeter planters, abutting parking lots and drive aisles, tree planting for parking lot shade, and a combination of continuous planting strips, planting fingers, and parking islands throughout the parking lot. Parking lot landscape requirements applicable to parking lots commercial, industrial, Mixed-Use, and multi-family parking lots with five (5) or more spaces are listed below: 3. Each unenclosed parking facility shall provide a perimeter landscaped strip at least s+~five feet (56') wide (inside dimension) where the facility adjoins a side or rear property line. The perimeter landscaped strip may include any landscaped yard or landscaped area otherwise required and shall be continuous, except for required access to the site or parking facility. 36 P457 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Figure 17.58.060-2 Parking Lot Planter Design ^^ "^ FT. Minimum PI--'-- ong Side of Sta OR ~...,,~ FT. Minimum PI~,,.~, AlongPer Stall Front Section 17.58.070 Additional Requirements for Residential Areas A. Front Yard Landscaping. Where required iri Table 17.58.070-1 for new development (Trees Required in Residential Zones), front yard landscaping shalt include, at a minimum, one fifteen (15) gallon size tree, one five (5) gallon size tree, seeded ground cover, and a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. This requirement shall be in addition to required street trees. C. Trees Required. Table 17.58.070-1 (Trees Required in Residential Zones) sets forth minimum standards for the number and size of trees, both on- and off-site for new development. Chapter 17.62 Outdoor Sales, Storage, Display and Seating Section 17.62.030 Development, Operation, and-Maintenance B. Standards for Outdoor Display and Sales. The following development standards shall apply to all permanent and temporary outdoor display and sales activities: Associated with the Primary Use. All outdoor display and sales activities shall be associated with the primary use of the property. Only those goods and services associated with the primary use may be stored, sold, or displayed. All outdoor display and sales activities that are independent of the primary use shall be considered their own primary use and regulated as such~a~ No item shall be displayed in a manner that: causes a safety hazard; obstructs the entrance to any building; interferes with, or impedes the flow of, pedestrian or vehicle traffic, obstructs in Dart or in whole an emeroency vehicle/fire access lane; is unsightly or creates any other condition that is detrimental to the appearance of the premises or any surrounding property; or in any other manner is detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or causes a public nuisance. 37 P458 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Chapter 17.68 Parking and Loading Section 17.68.020 Applicability The regulations contained in this Chapter shall apply to the construction, change, or expansion of a use or structure and shall require that adequate parking spaces, loading areas, and bicycle parking areas are permanently provided and maintained for the benefit of residents, employees, customers, and visitors, within or outside of buildings or in a combination of both, in accordance with the requirements listed in this Chapter. These requirements shall be in addition to any other development requirements contained elsewhere within the Zoning Code (e.g., landscaping). Off-street parking and loading requirements of this Chapter shall be recalculated as listed below. 0 Section 17.68.050 Number of Parking Spaces Required TABLE 17.68.050-1 PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY LAND USE Use Spaces- Notes :.:Residential ~ _. , ,_ Single-family detached dwellings 2 per unit 2 in garage Multi-family development (condominium, townhome, etc.) semi-detached single-family (zero lot line, patio homes, duplexes, etc.) and mobile home parks. I'I - Studio 1.3 per unit 1 in garage or carport - One bedroom 1.5 per unit 1 in garage or carport - Two bedrooms 2 per unit 1 in garage or carport - Three bedrooms 2 per unit 2 in garage or carport - Four or more bedrooms 32_5 per unit 2 in garage or carport - Visitor (additional required) 1 per 3 units Commercial, Service, and Office Uses Shopping Centers - Less than 25,000 square feet Varies See individual uses - 25,000 to 599,000 square feet 5 per 1,000 sf Centers built prior to 1988 4.5/1,000 38 P459 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code `Use Spaces Notes - 599,000 to 1,000,000 square feet 5.5 per 1,000 sf or a Parking Study .Centers built prior to 1988 require may be provided 4.5/1,000 - Food service (if over 15% of GLAi2~) +1 per 100 sf Additional applied to floor area of food service use - Cinemas in centers less than 100,000 square feet (occupying less than 10% +3 per 100 seats of GLA~2~) Cinemas in centers of 100,000 to 200,000 square feet, additional +3 per 100 parking only required after the first 750 seats - Offices (if over 10% of GLA)t2~ - Parking study required - Shopping Center over 1,000,000 - Parking study required square feet Carwash and detail (full service) 16 stalls Carn%ash (self service grid drive thru) 2.5 per wash bay Service/gas station 3.0 per 1,000 sf+2 per service bay Barber shops/beauty parlors Park at retail Laundromats and/or dry cleaners park at retail Offices, financial institutions, retail stores 4 per 1,000 sf Commercial storage yards (e.g., 6 spaces Separated from enclosed storage contractors, salvage) area Includes area of open area devoted Lumber yard 4 per 1,000 sf to display of lumber and other products Mortuaries and funeral homes 1 per 35 sf APPlies only to the assembly room floor area Motels and hotels 1 per unit + 2 2 additional spaces for manager Customer parking (additional Vehicle sales, repair, service 2.5 per 1,000 sf spaces needed for vehicle storage related to business operations) Furniture and appliance stores 2 per 1,000 sf Day cares/pre-schools 1 per employee + 1 per 5 children Public utilities uses 1 per 2 employees Storage for utility-owned vehicles (2 minimum) must also be provided for Commercial Recreation. Uses Bowling alleys and/or billiard halls 5 per alley and/or 2 per table 39 P460 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code - Use Spades Notes Stables 1 per 5 horses Driving ranges 1 per tee Additional parking required for related uses on site Golf courses 6 per hole Additional parking required for related uses on site Miniature golf course 3 per hole Additional parking required for related uses on site Skating rinks 5 per 1,000 sf Includes related uses and all indoor " " and outdoor active areas Swimming pool (commercial) 5 per 1,000 sf Included related uses and all indoor " " and outdoor active areas, Tennis, handball, and racquetball facilities 3 per court Additional parkirig required for related uses on site Health clubs and other fitness related 5 per 1,000 sf facilities 'Educa4ional-Uses Elementary and junior high schools 2 per classroom Senior high school 1 per employee + 1 per 6 students Colleges, universities 1 per 2 employees + 1 per 3 students Commercial schools (trade, business 1 per student + 1 colleges, etc.) per faculty =Medical/Health Uses;' '- Dentist, medical, veterinary offices/clinics 5 per 1,000 sf Congregate care facilities (e.g., nursing, ' 1 per 4 beds Based on resident capacity children s, sanitariums) Hospitals 1.75 per bed .Places of Assembly - Restaurants and lounges 10 per 1,000 sf Fast-food restaurant 10 per 1,000 sf 1 per 3 seats or 1 Auditoriums, sports arenas, stadiums per 35 sf of seating area Movie theaters - Single Screen 1 per 3 seats - Multi-Screen 1 per 4 seats 40 P461 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Use ___ Spaces 'Notes 1 per 3 seats or 1 1.5 linear feet on a bench is Other places of assembly (e.g., churches) per 35 sf of main equivalent to 1 seat. Schedule of auditorium activities and/or Parking study may be required. '.Industrial, Warehousing, and Manufacturing 1 per 1,000 sf for first 20.000 sf: 1 per 2,000 sfforthe Warehouse/storage next 20.000 sf: and 1 per 4.000 sf for the remaining sf Industrial/manufacturing 2 per 1,000 sf Research and development 3 per 1,000 sf Office and administration 4 per 1,000 sf Multi-tenant buildings (office less than IZI 2.5 per 1,000 sf 35% GLA ) Indoor wholesale/retail commercial 4 per 1,000 sf (1J Fifty percent (50%) of the total required covered spaces shall be within enclosed garage structures. The use of carports requires approval from the Design Review Committee. (2) GLA is Gross Leasable Area Section 17.68.060- Reductions in Parking Requirements C. Other Parking Reductions. Required parking for any use except asingle-family dwelling, second dwelling unit, or two-family dwelling may be reduced through approval of a Minor Exception r a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning 6eaaa3issier+Director. Criteria for Approval. The Planning 6emraissier~Director will only grant a Conditional Use Permit for reduced parking if it finds that the project meets all of the Conditional Use Permit criteria in Section 17.18.020 (Conditional Use Permits) and that three or more of the circumstances listed below are true. Section 17.68.110 Electric Vehicle Parking Requirements The following requirements apply to electric vehicle parking facilities. All charginq facilities shall be approved through the Plan Check /Zoning Clearance process: A. Electric Vehicle charginq. When provided, electric vehicle charginq stations shall meet the requirements of the California Electrical Code. B.___ _Designated Spaces. Outdoor charginq of electric vehicle shall only occur in designated electric vehicle spaces, according to the following: 1. Electricity shall only be provided from outdoor electrical outlets installed according to the California Electrical Code: 41 P462 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code 2. Electric cords shall not cross vehicular or Dedestrian oathwavs 3. When installed in common oarking areas (e.a. surface parking lots garages. etc.) the spaces shall be restricted to electric vehicles charging-dnly and identified with signage and pavement markings. C. Electric Vehicles in Single Family Residential. When installed. electric vehicle charging in single family residential areas shall be located as follows: 1. Within a garage or carport: 2. Outside of setback area: or 3. If within a setback area, screened from view of the public right-of-way with landscaping or fencing. Chapter 17.74 Sidewalks and Trails Section 17.74.030 On-Site Pedestrian Pathways The pedestrian path system shall be designed to provide the pedestrian safe passage throughout the project area. Adherence to all of the following provisions will create maximum safe connectivity for pedestrians: G. Perimeter pathways around each building in nonresidential districts, with the following requirements: 2. Building perimeter pathways ^ ~'^^"~'"^ •~ ~^sshall comply with ADA requirements as outlined in the Building Code. Chapter 17.78 Sign Regulations for Private Property Section 17.78.080 Allowed Permanent On-Site Sign Standards TABLE 17.78.080-1 SIGNAGE STANDARDS FOR PERMANENT ON-SITE SIGNS Sign Ty Institution Multi-Family Complex, <_12 units Districts Wall Sign Monument Sign Wall Sign Monument Sign :Permitted 1 sign per establishment 1 sign per establishment 1 sign per street frontage, maximum 2 signs !Maximum Maximum'... Area Height " 20 sf Roofline 24 sf 6' Roofline or 20', whichever is 12 sf less 6' 42 P463 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Development Standards ~'~ Sign Type ,;Maximum=Number Maximum Maximum permitted Area Height- Roofline or 20', Multi-Family Wall Sign 1 sign per street whichever is Complex, >12 frontage, maximum 2 24 sf less i un ts signs Monument Sign 6' Permanent Wall Sign 6' Subdivision 2 signs per development 24 sf Identification Sign Monument Sign 4' Wall Sign 1 per use 20 sf Roofline S h l c oo Monument Sign 1 per use 50 sf 20' Commercial,'Office,:and MixedaUse Zoning Districts ' 1 wall sign Max 3 2 sf :1 If, max Roofline or 20', Wall Sign per building signs 150 sf whichever is face, max 3 total less Establishments 1 monument between Not in a Multi- Monument Sign sign per both 24 sf 8' Tenant Center street, max 2 types Pedestrian Traffic 1 per establishment 6 sf 12' Sign Wall Sign, 1 sign per establishment 2 sf :1 If, max Primary per building face, max 3 150 sf per Roofline or 20', Establishment establishment whichever is Retail Wall Sign, Sub- 1 sign per sub- less Establishments in M lti T Establishment establishment, max 2 75 sq. ft. total a u - enant Center Monument i+i 1 sign per street ~z~ 24 sf i~1 8' frontage Pedestrian Traffic 1 per establishment 6 sf 12' Sign 6 signs total (maximum 4 1:1 sf to lineal Cannot proiect Retail Wall Signs signs per building face) frontage ratio above wall plane Establishments Over 100.000 Monument Sians tamer street frontage 48 sf 8' Square Feet (Free-Standing 1 sign per sub- d ithi M lti Wall Sign: Sub establishment (maximum 75 sf (total of 3 Cannot proiect an w n u - T t C t ) Establishment 3sub-establishment si ns above wall plane enan en ers si ns 1 sign per establishment 2 sf :1 If, max Wall Sign per building face, max 2 50 sf per Roofline Office establishment Establishments in a Multi-Tenant Monument Sign 1 sign per street 24 f 8' t+> frontage s Center Pedestrian Traffic 1 per establishment 6 sf 12' Sign 43 P464 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code °Deyelopment Standards f3) Sign Type - Maximum'Number' ' Maximum `Maximum - --- ° Permitted Area Helght_- Project Identification 1 sign per street ' Sign, All Wall Sign frontage, max 2 24 sf 6 Development Types Ihdustiial Zoning ~Districts Wall Sign 1 sign per establishment 2 sf :1 If, max 150 sf per Roofline All per building face, max 2 establishment Establishments Monument Sign ' 1 sign per street fz> 24 sf 8' I I frontagelzl Table Notes: (1 J On multi-tenant monument signs, the name of the center shall not be calculated in the maximum sign area. Rather, the name o/the center shall have a separate maximum sign area of 8 square lest. All tenant signs shall have a minimum letter height of 8 inches. The maximum number of tenants is four on each sign /ace. The two sign faces of a monument sign are not required to be identical in terms of tenant ident~cation. (2J May be increased fo 2 per street frontage when signs are spaced a minimum of 300 feet apart. Alternatively, the maximum area maybe increased to 48 square feet when the site /rontage is longer than 500 /set. In no case may these two allowances be combined. (3J Signage required according to the Fire District's standards for multi-family and. commerciaUindustdal facilities are exempt from the limits established by this fable. Section 17.78.090 Allowed Temporary On-Site Sign Standards TABLE 17.78.090-1 ALLOWED TEMPORARY ON-SITE SIGN STANDARDS 'Sign Type. ', ':' On-Site Subdivision Signs 1 sign per street 32 sf per side General Signs frontage of the boundary of the. , max 2 sides (64 15' S' project sf total) Flags 6 flags 15 sf per flag 15' 5' All Other Uses t~1 Wall 1 sign per u Roofline 5' establishment 50 sf Ground Sign 8' S' Flags 1 flag 15 sf per flag 15" 5" Table Notes: (1) Must be located outside of the clear visibility triangle. (2) Choice of one sign type at a time. I3) Temporary signs for special events in conjunction with an approved Temporary Use Permit are limited to a maximum of 25 square lest and require property owner aporoval 44 P465 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Chapter 17.84 Tree Preservation Section 17.84.040 - Tree Replacement Policy Where existing eucalyptus windrows are to be removed, they shall be replaced with Eucalyptus maculata (spotted gum),_ Euca/vptus nicholii. or other Eucalvptus species as approved by the Planning Director along the established grid pattern in fifteen (15) gallon size minimum spaced at eight feet (8') on center and properly staked, unless otherwise specified by a Specific Plan or Community Plan or the Fire Code. Section 17.84.060 Tree Maintenance A-D_To ensure adequate and uniform maintenance, eucalyptus windrows should be maintained in a manner that preserves the aesthetics and history of the eucalyptus windrows and consistent with the Citv's fire hazard abatement provisions. 45 P466 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Article V Specific Use Requirements Chapter 17.92 Drive-In and Drive-Through Uses Section 17.92.030 Development and Design Standards Figure 17.92.030-1 Drive-Through Site Standards Public Street - ~ '' ' 300 min between uses wlthdrive-through facilities o and intersections and other drive-through facilities on the same side of the street ~ i hi - 5' i b k f h fezcept w n a shopping t ~ ~ ~ _ 4 m n set ac rom t e ultimate curb center or master plan) -. ~ I face for parking and drive-through lane - ~_ _ Drive thru lanes shall be screened _ ~_"-'-'~ through building orientation, the use of a combination of low I o screen walls, heavy landscaping, Buildings shall orient the $ ~ I' and trellis work. public entrances toward ~ ~ II The minimum Boor area for drive- thestreet I I ~ -, j I I I I~ I I through facilities shall be 1,500 sf The drivethru lane shall be a sufficient ~. length to accommodate the necessary v ' I ~ I I w stacking o(cars. The stacking distance ~' -_ - ~^ shall be determined through a parking r^ __ _ 0 G studyas provided in Chapter 17.68 V j - (Parking and Loading). - - a _ , ~ Il O Courtyards, plazas, and other landscape - O ~ open spaces should be used to promote 200' min 6e[ween restaurants ~ ?- 'T - safe and convenient pedestrian with drive-throughfacilities - O _~- movement with continuous landscape and any residential use or district boundary = -I- pathway between buildings. I ~ i - --It-- - _ -~_ The parking requirements for drive ~ t~ thm facilities shall be according to I Chapter 77.68 (Parking and Loading). ` .Public Street 46 P467 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Chapter 17.98 Home Occupations Section 17.98.020 Permit Required Prior to the establishment of a home occupation, a Home Occupation Permit shall first be secured by the user. A Home Occupation Permit shall be in addition to any other permit or license that may be required by the City, County, or State, including a Business License. Home Occupatioh Permits are allowed on legal non-conforming residential oroperties (e.o., existing single family home that is legally non-conformino on a parcel that is zoned industriall. Chapter 17.104 Public Utilities and Uses Section 17.104.040 Development Requirements for Fixed-Base Structure and Facilities D. Treatment Plant. Treatment plants shall observe all development standards of the underlying zoning district, except that any treatment ponds or other structures that may emit an odor shall be located a minimum of two hundred feet (200') from a residential zoning district or residential use. The use shall also provide landscaping along the perimeter of the use, including a minimum twenty-five foot (25') wide landscape area and trees planted thirty feet (30') on center. Landscaping for treatment plants located in wildland-urban interface fire areas shall comply with the vegetation management requirements of the Fire District. Chapter 17.110 Temporary Uses Section 17.110.020 Permit Requirements and Exemptions Uses of property (including land, buildings, and structures) grid activities that are temporary in nature shall comply with the permit requirements described below. The process for application for and review and issuance of a Temporary Use Permit shall be as described in Section 17.16.070 (Temporary Use Permit). A. Temporary Use Permit Required. The following temporary activities and uses may be allowed, subject to the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit prior to the commencement of the activity or use and subject to the requirements within this section. Construction yards, storage sheds, and construction offices (off-site) in conjunction with an approved construction project, where the yard is located on a site different from the site of the approved construction project. 2. Entertainment and assembly events, including carnivals, circuses, concerts, fairs, festivals, food events, fundraisers, haunted houses, outdoor entertainment/sporting events, and similar events designed to attract large crowds and that are held either on private or public property when not otherwise part of or consistent with a permitted use (e.g., race at a raceway). 3. Farmers Markets, as defined in this Title, held on public or private property. 47 P468 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code 4. Swap meets, as defined in this Chapter, including flea markets, rummage sales, and similar events held on public or private property. 5. Seasonal sales as defined in this Chapter (e.g., Halloween, Christmas), including temporary residence/security trailers. 6. Temporary sales offices as defined in this Title. 7. Fruit and vegetable stands (related to on-site businessl. 8. Outdoor display of merchandise as accessory to current on-site business. 6-9. Parking lot and sidewalk sales. ~10Other temporary activities that the Planning Director determines are similar in nature and intensity to those identified above. Section 17.110.040 Standards for Specific Temporary Uses The following standards shall apply to the specific temporary uses described below. B. Parking Lot and Sidewalk Sales. Parking lot and sidewalk sales may be permitted on private property in the commercial/retail areas of the City, including retail/wholesale businesses located in industrial areas, in connection with current on- site businesses, subject to the approval of a Temporary Use Permit as provided in Section 17.16.070 (Temporary Use Permits) and the following criteria: 4. The activity shall not present a hazard to pedestrians or encroach on a required building exit or emergency vehicle/fire access lanes. K. Model Homes. Model homes may be used as offices solely for:the first sale of homes within a recorded tract subject to the following conditions: 12. Temporary landscaping, including minimum -3648-inch box trees, shall be provided within the on-street parking area (cul-de-sac). Temporary landscaping shall also be provided within a planter area surrounding the overflow parking area. Chapter 17.112 Wireless Communication Facilities Section 17.112.020 Permit Requirements and Exemptions D. Removal of wireless communication facilities is exempt from permit requirements. ~E. Replacement of equipment which does not substantially change the tower or shelter is exempt from planning permits, but may be subject to other building permits. 48 P469 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Article VI Special Planning Areas Chapter 17.116 Master Plan Purpose Section 17.116.010 Special Planning Area Purpose and Intent Special Planning Areas are geographic areas within the City that have adopted plans with unique use, development, and/or design regulations that vary or deviate from the Citywide zoning and development standards. Throughout the United States, Special Planning Areas are created for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to private development applications for master planned communities, protection of unique resources (e.g., historic district, environmental protection), special site considerations (e.g., hillside development, scenic corridors), and/or special use considerations (e.g., targeted use areas, redevelopment opportunities). Since incorporation, Special Planning Areas in Rancho Cucamonga have been established for all of the above listed reasons. This Chapter identifies and describes the City's Special Planning Areas, which are areas subject to unique zoning and development regulations according to the following general categories: C. Master Plans. Master Plans are discretionary planning entitlements (not a zoning ~-.•, . district) that allow flexibility in the allowed uses and development standards for specific types of projects: Master Plans are required for mixed-use projects and other integrated developments that warrant special development consideration beyond conventional zoning regulations to address the special or unique needs,or characteristics. Master Plans are also required for areas designated on the General Plan Land Use Map with the Master Plan symbol '~„ ''„,~-~-o.^^ ^"^~. The Master Plan entitlement requires preparation of a conceptual master plan to address issues such as circulation, drainage, open space linkages, trail connections, compatibility with adjacent uses, and similar concerns through a comprehensive approach and creative design flexibility. Master Plans are intended to assure a harmonious relationship between the existing and proposed uses, and to coordinate and promote the community improvement efforts of both private and public resources. Subsequent development within the master planned areas must be consistent with the approved conceptual master plans. Chapter 17.118 Master Plan Descriptions Section 17.118.040 Master Plan Descriptions The Master Plans listed below have been adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This is a partial list because the City has also approved other Master Plans that are simply site plans approved as part of the previous master planning entitlement. This Section provides a reference to eask~the more detailed adegted-Master Plans, along with a summary of the unique land use and development standards applicable to each individual Master Plan. A full copy of all adopted Master Plan documents (and any adopted amendments thereto) shall be kept in the Planning Department and in the City Clerk's office. 49 P470 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Article VII Design Standards and Guidelines Chapter 17.132 Residential Design Standards TABLE 77.132.010-1 SINGLE-FAMILY VARIATIONS REQUIRED Number of Dwellings Floor Plans (minimum)' Elevations {per floorplan)2 X10 3 2 11-20 4 3 210 5 3 410 6 4 61-80 7 4 81-100 8 4 Over 100 8+1 (for each 40 additional) 4 t 1) The tollowing maybe counted as additional floor plans: Reverse footprints Alternate orientation of 90 degrees or greater Alternate garege orientation (i.e., side entry or detached) t2) Reverse footprints shall not count as additional elevations. Variations in the tollowing design elements, which create a significant difference in sfreetscape appearance, shall count as additional elevations: Plans with different architectural styles Plans with changes in massing and scale Plans with root ridges running in different directions Plans with significant changes in root pitch appropriate to the style Chapter 17.132.040 Residential Development M. Recreation Area /Facility. Where required, in the M, MH and H residential districts. the developer shall provide recreational amenities in conjunction with common open space as follows: 1. Development consisting of 30 units or less shall provide three of the following recreational amenities: a. Large open lawn area, one of the dimensions shall be a minimum of 50 feet. b.' Enclosed tot lot with multiple plav equipment. c. Spa or pool. d. Barbecue facility equipped with grill, picnic benches, etc. 2. Development consisting of 31 units to 100 units shall provide another set of recreational amenities as described in sub-section 17.132.040 M.1 above. or equivalent, as approved by the Planning Commission. 50 P471 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code 3. Development consisting of 101 units to 200 units shall provide five of the following recreational amenities: or equivalent as approved by the Planning Commission: a. Large open lawn, one of the dimensions shall be a minimum of 100 feet. b. Multiple enclosed tot lots with multiple play equipment. The tot lots shall be conveniently located throughout the site. The number of tot lots and their location shall be subject to Planning Commission review and approval. c. Pool and spa. d. Community multi-purpose room equipped with kitchen, defined areas for games, exercises. etc. site. The number of barbecue facilities and their locations shall be subject to Planning Commission review and approval. f. Court facilities (e.g. tennis, volleyball basketball etc.). q. Jogging/walking trails with exercise stations. 4. For each 100 units above the first 200 units, another set of recreational amenities as described in subsection 17.132.040 M.3 above. shall be provided. 5. Other recreational amenities not listed above may be considered subject to Planning Commission review and approval. 6. Related recreational activities may be grouped together and located at any one area of the common open space. 7. Dispersal of recreational facilities throuahout the site shall be required for development with multiple recreational facilities. 8. All recreation areas or facilities required by this section shall be maintained 51 to the approved standards of the Citv. P472 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code Article VIII Glossary Chapter 17.136 Universal Definitions Section 17.36.020 Universal Definitions Mobile Hot Food Truck Event. A special occasion involving one or more mobile hot food trucks on private property in compliance with required criteria for an approved Temporary Use Floor Area Ratio. The ratio between gross floor area of the primary structure(s) on a site and gross site area. It includes all occupvable floors of a building, making it athree-dimensional unit of measure. For example, amulti-story building with a total floor area of one hundred thousand (100.0001 square feet on a fifty thousand (50,0001 square foot lot will have a FAR of 2.0. The following are examples of how a building with a total floor area of 100,000 sf can be configured on 50,000 sf lot to achieve. a FAR of 2.0. 100% Lot Coverage: • 50,000 sf Floor Plate • 2 Stories 50% Lot Coverage: • 25,000 sf Floor Plate • 4 Stories 25%'Lot Coverage: • 12,500 sf Floor Plate • 8 Stories Planning Entitlement. A permit or other approval required for land use and development purposes to determine compliance with applicable zoning and development regulations. as well as planning and zoning laws. Yard, Front. A yard extending the full width of the lot between the front lot line (measured from face of curb) and a line parallel thereto and passing through the nearest point of the building; provided that, if a future street right-of-way has been established, such measurement shall be from the future street •'^'•` ^'~,.-~=.may-•~^~~ "^,^~,^urb face line. Chapter 17.146 Sign Definitions Chapter 17.146.020 Sign Definitions Pedestrian Traffic Sign. A sign designed and located for the primary purpose of pedestrian viewing and direction (e.g., under canopy sign, pedestrian access sign). 52 P473 Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Public Draft Development Code 53 P474 The following additional amendments to the Municipal Code outside of Title 17 are to be made to accommodate the Development Code Update: Chapter 5.12 (Regulation of Entertainment) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby deleted. Chapter 19.08 (Tree Preservation) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby deleted. Title 14 (Signs) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby deleted. Sections 2.24.040 through 2.24.270 of Chapter 2.24 (Historic Preservation) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code are hereby deleted. Section 2.20.090 (Public Notification Procedures) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby deleted. Section 1.12.270 C (Content of Compliance Order) is hereby amended as follows: The action required to correct the violation and the date by which such action must be completed. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the date for compliance shall not be less than forty„-eight hours from the date the compliance order is served; Section 8.27.050 (Street Address Numbering Review) is hereby amended as follows: For other than single-family residential properties, location, size, contrast, visibility and mounting of street address numbers for new projects shall be subject to, and a part of, review under the land use and development approval requirements of Chapter 17.12 of this code. Section 12.08.055 B 2 (Construction of Public Improvements -Exemption of Private Streets) is hereby amended as follows: Procedures-Notice and Hearing. The application petition shall be filed with the city clerk of the city together with payment of appropriate fees. Upon receipt of the application petition, the city clerk shall schedule the matter for a public hearing before the city council occurring at a regular meeting no later than sixty days following the filing of the application petition. Notice of the public hearing shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of Section 17.14.050. ATTACHMENT 4 P475 Section 16.16.040 (Submittal Information for Growth Management Plan Consistency) is hereby amended as follows: Tentative maps submitted as total development rather than tract subdivision shall, in addition to the material required by Sections 16.16.020 and 16.16.030 submit the following material: A. An illustrative site plan to include proposed and existing improvements, landscape concepts and other elements as may be necessary to illustrate the site plan; 8. A preliminary architectural plan showing typicals of all sides of proposed buildings and structures indicating materials to be used, frees, landscaping and shadows to give elevations graphic dimension; C. Development schedule of anticipated proposed project including phasing. Section 16.18.060 J (Submittal for City Approval) is hereby amended as follows: Letter of certification-School district: The applicant shall submit to the community development director written certification from all affected elementary and high school districts that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by the proposed project; Section 16.18.060 K (Submittal for City Approval) is hereby amended as follows: Letter of certification-Sewer and water agencies: The applicant shall submit to the community development director written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project. For projects using septic facilities allowable by the Santa Ana regional water quality control board and the city, written certification of acceptability including all supportive information shall be obtained and submitted to the city; Section 16.20.030 G 2 (Contents) is hereby amended as follows: Type and circumference, and dripline of existing trees as defined by Chapter 17.84. Any trees proposed to be removed shall be so indicated, P476 The General Plan EIR was distributed under separate cover to the City Council in March, 2010 An electronic copy is available for viewing and download on our website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/planning/genplan.asp ATTACHMENT 5 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report ADDENDUM This Addendum to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plon Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2000061027) (the "EIR") has been prepared in connection with the City's comprehensive update to its proposed Development Code Update (the "Project"). The Addendum confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the Project were adequately addressed in the EIR and that a subsequent EIR or negative declaration is not required for the Project. Proposed Development Code Update The Project is a comprehensive update to the City's Development Code designed to implement the policies of the recently completed 2010 General Plan Update. If adopted, the Project would set requirements for private development of property, including development standards, permitted uses, building height, building setbacks, parking standards, sign standards, landscaping requirements, subdivisions, animal keeping regulations, and other development-related topics. The Development Code has not been comprehensively updated since its original adoption in 1983. At that time, the City was predominantly vacant, and most development concerned of large tracts of land with hundreds of residential units or large distribution warehouse complexes. As reflected in the 2010 General Plan Update, the City is now largely developed with most land use applications being proposed for smaller residential subdivisions or more modest commercial and industrial development. The priricipal objectives of the Development Code Update are to: • Implement the policies of the General Plan • Ensure the Code is consistent with state and federal laws • Make the Code modern, integrated, and easy to use for developers, business owners, residents, staff, and decision makers • Streamline approval procedures while ensuring meaningful public participation • Create value by promoting mixed use development in designated areas • Allow for the development of modern housing and business uses • Promote sustainable development • Simplify design standards without compromising the quality of development • Incorporate and update regulations currently located elsewhere in the code, including Entertainment, Tree Preservation, Signs, and Historic Preservation. The Project is considered to be largely procedural in nature. The Project will also update the City's zoning map to reflect the mixed use land use designations shown on the General Plan Land Use Map (Exhibit 3-3 of the General Plan EIR) and to specific plans and overlay districts previously adopted by the City but not appear on the current map. 1 Additionally, the Project included the consolidation of land use tables into one master land use table with consistent descriptions across all base zoning districts. These changes are made to ease implementation of the Development Code by City Staff, and to improve understanding with the general public. Table A-1 shows the translation of existing land use activities into fewer land use descriptions. P477 Page 1 of 14 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update - EnvironmentollmpadReport Table A-1: Consolidation of New Land Use from Current Land Uses ~New=Land Use esertption .~_..,.~ Accessory Retail, Business Supply Services Current~Land Use Description ~..,~,.~..w .. ~ r.~.. ,.~,.. Related commercial uses (blueprinting, stationary, quick copy, etc.) when incidental to an office building or complex. Adult Oriented Business Adult Entertainment Animal Sales and Groomin Taxidermists. g Pet Shops Artist and photographic studios, not including the sale of equipment or supplies. Art Anti ue and Collectable Sho Antique shops. q , p Stamp and coin shops. Cultural Artist Exhibits: (a) Indoor Gallery and Art Sales Club, Lodge, Fraternity & Sorority A mbl U Churches, convents, monasteries, and other religious institutions. sse y se Religious Assembly Public Assembly Private and public clubs and lodges Indoor-Fitness-and Sports Facilities YMGA, Y)/yCA, and similar youth group. uses. Automotive sales and services (including motorcycles, boats, trailers, and campers). Auto and Vehicle Sales and Rental . Automotive Services -Rentals. Automotive Sales and Leasing Truck and trailer rental, sales and service. Auto and Vehicle Storage Automotive Fleet Storage Auto Parts and Sales Auto Service -Parts and Supplies Automotive Services -Parts and supplies. Banks and Financial Services Financial services and institutions, including drive-through banks. Bar/Ni ht l b Cocktail lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment operated independent of a restaurant. g c u Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge tavern) including related entertainment Discotheques Bed and Breakfast Bed and Breakfast Broadcasting and Recording Studios Communication Services Business Support Services Blueprint and photocopy services. Photocopy. Printing shops. Blueprint and Photocopy Services Janitorial Services and Supplies Messenger and Wire Services P478 Page 2 of 14 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Imoact Reaart New L~ nd~Use De`°"s ption s . ' Curter ntt~Land~Use~De c rption ~` Photocopy (Xerox) Business and Office Services Building Maintenance Services Business Supply Retail & Services Business Support Services Janitorial services and supplies. Car Washin and Detailin Automotive Services -Coin-op washing. g g Automotive Services -Automatic washing. Caretaker Housing Caretaker's Residence Mortuaries and Cemeteries Child Day Care Facility/Center Day Care Facilities. Commercial Center/Civic Use Public buildings (city and county buildings, special districts, and post office). Administrative Civic Services Consignment Store Second-hand store. Convenience Store, Liquor Store Food & Beverage Sales Convention Center Convention Centers Crematory Services Crematory Services Drive-in and Drive-thru Sales and Services Drive-in businesses, including theaters. (other than fast food restaurants). Dwelling, Multi-Family Multiple Family Dwellings Dwelling, Second Unit Second Dwelling Unit (including elder cottage) Dwelling, Single-Family Single-Family Detached Dwelling, Two-Family Single-Family Attached (duplex, triplex, fourplex) Emergency Shelter Emergency Shelters Stable, Commercial Equestrian Facility, Commercial Feed & Tack Store (if accessory to commercial stable) Equestrian Facility, Hobby Stable, Private Equipment Sales 8 Rental Heavy Equipment Sales & Rentals Equipment Sales and Rental Equipment rental yards. Family Day Care Home, Large Day Care FacilityNon-Accessory - 7 or more Family Day Care Home, Small Day Care Facility Accessory - 6 or less Feed and Tack Store Feed & Tack Store Fuel Storage and Distribution Petroleum Products Storage Furniture F rni hin d A li Appliance stores and repair. , g an u s pp ances Furniture stores, repair and upholstery. arden Center/Plant Nursery Nurseries and garden supply stores; provided, in the NC district, all equipment, supplies and material are kept within an enclosed area, and provided that fertilizer is stored in packaged form only. Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores Within Enclosed Area P479 Page 3 of 14 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 Genero/ Plon Update Environmental Impact Report General Retail Apparel stores. Art, music, and photographic studios and supply stores. Book, gift and stationary stores (other than adult related material). Carpenter shop or cabinet shop. Dairy product stores. Deoartment stores. Drug stores and pharmacies. Electronic goods (i.e. TV's, stereos, radios, VCR's) sales and service. Florist shops. General retail stores. Hardware stores. Jewelry stores. Newspaper and magazine stores. Office and business machine stores. Office supply stores. Plumbing shop and supplies. Shoe stores, sales and repair. Soortinc goods stores. stores. ~tv stores. r+NNaia - ovuuyuca Apparel -General Art, Music, Photographic Studios, and Supply Stores Book, Gift, and Stationery Stores (other than adult related material) China and Glassware Stores Curtain and Drapery Shops Drug Stores and Pharmacies: (a) Over 10,000 square feet Drug Stores and Pharmacies:' (b) Pharmacies with or without specialty retail under 10,000 square feet Electronic Sales and Service (TV's, Stereos, Radios, Computers) Floor Covering Shops Florist Shops Page 4 of 14 P480 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plon Update Environmental Imoact Resort ~,~,New Land~Use D~~~ esc~iption ~Cu rent~L,and~Use Des nption Hardware Stores Hobby Shops Jewelry Stores Leather Goods and Luggage Stores Newspaper and Magazine Stores Office, Business Machine and Computer Component Stores Office Supply Stores Paint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores Record and Tape Stores Shoe Stores and Repair Shops Specialty Retail Sporting Goods Stores: (a) Specialty; Backpacking, Tennis, Skiing, Mountaineering, Fishing, etc. (b) General; Encompassing a variety of sports equipment Swimming Pool Services and Supplies Toy Stores Variety Department Stores, Junior Department Stores Watch and Clock Repair Stores Yardage Goods Stores Grocery Store/Supermarket Food stores and supermarkets. Guest House Guesf House Home improvement centers -Material stored and sold within enclosed buildings. Home Improvement Supply Store Home improvement centers -Outdoor storage of material such as lumber and building materials. Specialty Building Supplies & Home Im rovement H t l d M t l Hotels and Motels. o e an o e Hotel Facilities (major) Commercial recreation facilities. Indoor Amusement EntertainmenUlndoor Sports Commercial recreation facilities -Indoor uses such as bowling, theaters, billiards, etc. and Fitness/ Outdoor Commercial Recreation Commercial recreation facilities -Outdoor uses such as golf, tennis, basketball, baseball, trampolines, etc. IndoorAmusemenUEntertainmentFacility Arcades Music, dance, and martial arts studio. I d Fit d S rt F ilit Recreation Facilities n oor ness an po s ac y Health and Athletic Gyms Music, Dance, and Martial Arts Studios Librar nd M m Libraries and Museums, Public and Private y a useu Cultural P481 Page 5 of 14 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report New L_a_nd Use Description C-urgent Land Use Description Liquor Store Liquor stores. Maintenance and Repair, Small Equipment Building & Light Equipment Supplies 8 Sales Manufacturing, Custom Custom Manufacturing Manufacturing, Custom Repair Services Manufacturing, Heavy Heavy Manufacturing Manufacturing, Light Light Manufacturing Manufacturing, Medium Medium Manufacturing Manufacturing, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Minimum Impact Heavy Manufacturing Massage Establishment Massage establishments. Medical Services -Extended Care Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals edical Services -General Medical, dental, and related health services (non-animal related), including laboratories and clinics; only the sale of articles clearly incidental to the services provided shall be permitted. MedicallDental Offces and Related Health Clinics Optician and Optometrist Shops Medical Services, Extended Care Convalescent Center Medical Services, Extended Care /General, Hos ital MedicallHealth Care Services Medical Services, Hospitals Hospital Mobile Home Park Mobile Home Parks Administrative and executive offices. Clerical and professional offices. Public utility service offices. Travel agencies. Financial, Insurance 8 Real Estate Services Office Business and Professional Administrative & Office Professional/Design Services PoliticaPor Philanthropic Headquarters . Interior Decorating Firms Realtors and Real Estate Offices Travel Agencies Outdoor Commercial Recreation Commercial Recreational: (b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball Outdoor Commercial Recreation/Park Public Plaza Parks and Recreation Facilities, Public and Private Park and Public Plaza Public Park and Playground Parking Facility Parking facilities (commercial) where fees are charged. Pawn Shop Pawn shops. Personal Services Barber and beauty shops. Cleaning and pressing establishments. Weight reducing clinics Spiritualist readings or astrology forecasting. P4$2 Page 6 of 14 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report New Land Use Description C-unrent Land Use Desa.,ription Laundry (Self Service) Tailor Shops Fire & Police Station Public Safety Facility Public safety facility (police, fire, ambulance and paramedics). Recreational Vehicle Storage Recreational Vehicle Storage Yards Recycling Facility -Collection Materials Recovery Facilities -Collection Facilities Recycling Facility -Processing Materials Recovery Facilities -Processing Facilities Recycling Facility -Scrap and Dismantling Materials Recovery Facilities -Scrap Operation Research and Development Research Services Residential Care Facility Residential Care Facility Non-Accessory - 7 or more Residential Care Home Residential Care Facility Accessory - 6 or less Resource Related Recreation Outdoor Recreation Facility (non-commercial) Restaurant -Beer and Wine Restaurants (other than fast food) -incidental serving of beer and wine but without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment, or dancing. Restaurant -Beer and Wine/Restaurant -Full Liquor Service Theaters: (a) Dinner Theater R t t F ll Li S i Cocktail lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment accessory to a restaurant. es auran - u quor erv ce Restaurants (other than fast food) -with entertainment and/or cocktail lounge and bar. Bakeries (retail only). Candy Stores and Confectionaries Catering establishments. Restaurant - No liquor service Delicatessens. Fast-food restaurants. Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains Restaurants Convenience Sales & Services Retail, Accessory Prescription pharmacies, (also when located within a building containing the offices of 5 or more medical practitioners) R t il G l R t il W h Cl b Indoor WholesalelRetail Commercial e a , enera , e a are ouse u Warehouse-Style Retail Merchandising Educational institutions, parochial, private School, Academic (Public/Private), School Colle e (Public/Private) College or University , g Dormitory (if accessory to college or school) School, Specialized Education and Training Educational Services: Vocational, Technical, Trade, Business and Professional Schools Personal Services Service Stations Automotive Service Station P483 Page 7 of 14 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Imaact Reoort New 'and Use Descn €ion. p "'~"~'-'"~~ 6urrent ~and~Use Description , -~..a .__~ .. Automotive Fueling Services Service or gasoline dispensing stations Service StationsNehicle Services -Minor (including minor repair such as tune-ups, brakes, batteries, tires, mufflers). Specialty Food Store Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores Stora e Yard/Ancilla Office Building Contractor's Office & Yards g ry ' Building Contractor s Storage Yard Storage, Personal Storage Facility Public Storage Theaters and Auditoriums Movie Theater including Multiplex Theatres and Auditoriums/Drive in & Drive Through Extensive Impact Commercial Sales Thrift Store Thrift store. Transit Facility Transportation facilities (train and bus, taxi depots). Educatiorial Services: Instruction, Tutoring, Tutoring Center, Small/Large Counseling, Testing, Training Schools and Facilities il F ili f Public utility installations. Ut ity ac ty and In rastructure -Fixed base facilities Extensive Impact Utility Facilities Utility or Service Facility Vehicle Service, Minor/Vehicle Service, Automotive Service Court Major/Service Stations Automotive Services -Repairs (major engine Vehicle Services -Major work, muffler shops, painting, body work, and upholstery). Automotive Services -Tire sales and service (no outdoor storage). Vehicle Services -Minor Auto Service Minor Repair (does not include major engine work, muffler shops, painting, body work, upholstery, etc.) Animal Care Facility Veterinary (domestic): Veterinary Facility (a) Non-boarding Veterinary (domestic): (b) Boarding Wholesale Storage and Distribution -Heavy Heavy Wholesale, Storage 8 Distribution Wholesale Storage and Distribution -Light Light Wholesale, Storage & Distribution Wholesale Storage and Distribution -Medium Medium Wholesale, Storage & Distribution P484 Page 8 of 14 P485 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report As shown in Table A-2, the Project also identifies some new uses, but these are substantially similar to the existing land uses permitted within the base zoning districts. Table A-2: New Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District New Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District [N = Not Permitted, P=Permitted, C=Conditional] Land Use/Zoning > 2 x O i t9 u z H °- c7 x O = District Residential Uses Emergency N N N N N N N N N C N N N N C N ' N N N N N Shelter Group C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N C N N Residential Live-Work N N N N N N P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Manufactured PP P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home Mobile Home C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Park Single-Room Occupancy N N N P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Transitional P P P P PP P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Housing Recreation, Resource Preservation,Open Space, Education,and Public Assembly Uses Tutoring Center- N N N N N N C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N Large Tutoring Center N N N N N N P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Small Utility,Transportation, Public Facility, and Communication Uses Broadcasting and Recording N N N N N N N P N P N N N P P N N N N N N Studios Page 9 of 14 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report -.New Allowed Land-Uses and'Permit Requirements:by Base Zoning District [N ='Not Permitted, P=Permitted; L=Conditional] Land Use%Zonmg[ >+ J ~; ~ .x: ~ _ ~ ~ a: O, •u~. z u lT u. v ;~ u< ~ d - t7~ ~ x, ~~+ 'O z x -u LL u: O District',; . ; z j ~ Utility Facility and Infrastructure- N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C C C N C C Fixed Based Structures Utility Facility and Infrastructure - P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Pipelines Retail;i5ervice; and,Off ice Use s •' Call Centers N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N N N Card Room N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Check Cashing Business N N N N N N P N P P N N N P N N N N N N N Gun Sales N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N Hookah Shop N N N N N N C N N C N N N N N N N N N N N Internet Cafe N N N N N N P P P P P P N P N N N N N N N Pawnshop N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N Secondhand Dealer N N N N N N P N P P N N N N N N N N N N N Shooting Range N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N Smoke Shop N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N N N N N N Tattoo Shop N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N N N N N N Automobile~andNehide^Uses - . Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N P P P P P N P N N N N N N N Autobroker Auto and Vehicle Sales, Wholesale N N N N N N N P P P P P N P P N N N N N N The Project will not affect the current methods of conducting environmental review for new development applications. P486 Page 10 of 14 P467 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 1010 General Plan Update EnvironmentallmpactReport The 2010 General Plan Update and Environmental Impact Report On May 19, 2010, the City Council adopted the 2010 General Plan Update and certified the EIR. The updated plan serves as the foundation for many of the City's regulatory documents, including the Development Code, specific plans, community plans, master plans, and design guidelines. With the 2010 General Ptan update, the City's focus shifted to infill development (development of remaining vacant properties within developed business districts and residential neighborhoods). As stated above, the Project includes updating the. City's zoning map to conform to the mixed use designations in the 2010 General Plan Update. The mixed use general plan designation and zone district approach is a key feature of the General Plan Update and was the second of the objectives listed in the EIR for the general plan.Z Further, the mixed use concept is discussed in nearly every,chapter of the EIR impact discussion and the description of policies intended to address environmental impacts. The mixed use land use designation is reflected in the project description of the EIR in Tables 3-3 Buildout Summary by Land Use, 3-4 Residential Land Use Summary, and 3-S, Non-Residential Land Use Summary. a The project description also includes a narrative description of the location of the mixed use areas, and the General Plan includes Figure 3-3 illustrating the locations." The EIR evaluated potential for the 2010 General Plan Update to result in environmental impacts, as summarized in the following table: No Mitigation - Mitigation Measures Significant and Unavoidable Agricultural Resources Cultural Resources Aesthetics Biological Resources Hazards and Hazardous Agricultural Resources Geology and Soils Materials Air Quality Population, Housing and Hydrology and Water Quality Climate Change Employment Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources Public Services Noise Parks and Recreation Transportation and Traffic Utilities and Service Systems The City made findings regarding the environmental impacts of adopting the General Plan as well as overriding considerations for significant and unavoidable impacts, both individually and cumulatively, for the following issues: Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change, and Mineral Resources. The findings made by the City necessary to certify the EIR and adopt the General Plan also included a mitigation monitoring and reporting program. For impacts to Land Use and Planning, the City determined that changes or alterations have been incorporated into the General Plan that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR resulting in a less than significant impact. More specifically the City's findings stated there would be no conflict between the General Plan and the land development code because updates to the land development code, as well as adherence to standard conditions related to consistency of future development with the proposed 2010 Page 11 of 14 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report General Plan Update and the City's Development Code will reduce the potential impacts related to plan consistency to a less than significant level. CEQA Review Requirements The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") generally requires agencies to analyze the possible environmental impacts of a project prior to approval. Depending on the nature and extend of the potential impacts, the agency may be required to adopt a negative declaration or environmental impact report (EIR). Under Section 15162 of the CEC(A Guidelines, when an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. If the none of these conditions calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration are met, but minor technical changes or additions are necessary to a previously adopted environmental P488 Page 12 of 14 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report document are needed, Section 16164 of the CEQA Guidelines allow the lead agency to prepare an addendum to the prior environmental document. A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant should be included in the addendum, the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. The addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration, and must be considered by the decision-making body prior to making a decision on the project. Analysis This addendum to the EIR has been prepared for the Project because none of the conditions specified in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines requiring the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration are met. First, the Project does not propose substantial changes in the City's development regulations that were not analyzed in the EIR or that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The Project simply implements the goals and policies adopted in the City's General Plan and analyzed in the General Plan EIR. The General Plan specifically mentions revises and updating the Development Code, as shown in the following table. The Development Code shall be updated to reflect the density and LU-2.1, LU-2.2, LU-3.3, LU- intensity ranges (especially along Foothill Boulevard) as specified in 3.8, LU-4.2, LU-4.3, LU-4.5, the General Plan including updating the development standards to LU-5.1, LU-9.5, ED-2.1, ED- be consistent with the General Plan provisions. (Table LU-2 of 2.4 ED-4.4 Chapter 2J The Development Code shall be updated to develop guidelines or LU-2.4, LU-9.1, LU-9.2, LU- standards that will guide infill development and make it compatible 9.4, ED-1.4, ED-4.1 with the surrounding neighborhood communities The mixed use zoning was also reviewed throughout the EIR and illustrated in the General Plan Land Use Element in figures LU-2 and LU-3 and in Figure 3-3 of the Draft EIR. The proposed project does not change either the policies or the figures shown in both the EIR and the General Plan. The project does not change any densities, intensities, land uses, or designations beyond those analyzed in the EIR. As a result, there is no change in the project and no new significant environmental effects, or increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. P489 Page 13 of 14 P490 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report Second, there have been no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The EIR, which addressed the impacts of adopting the City's General Plan and revisions to the land development code, was adopted on May 10, 2010. The existing conditions reported in the EIR are very similar to those currently in existence. Since adoption of the General Plan in 2010, the City has not processed any amendments to the plan. As a result, there are no substantial changes to the environment which would require a modification of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Third, there is no new information of substantial importance that was not khown and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified that shows (a) the Project will have any significant effects not discussed in the -EIR; (b) the significant effects examined in the EIR will be substantially more severe than previously shown; (c) mitigation measures or.alternatives previously found to be infeasible would now be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project; or (d) considerably different mitigation measures or alternatives than those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment are now available. As the Project is consistent with the General Plan there are no new effects that were not discussed in the EIR. Similarly, the Project will not result in changes to the impacts identified in the EIR that could be considered substantially more severe. The Project does not alter any of the review processes in place for new projects, nor does it exempt new uses in the zoning. ordinance from review. The Project addresses areas of responsibility for development review and affirms the appropriate body to make recommendations clarifies appeal procedures and establishes project review timelines. None of these changes will result in physical changes to the environment inconsistent with the General Plan as analyzed in the EIR. No additional mitigation measures are necessary. Summary In sum, the General Plan EIR sufficiently analyzed the potential impacts associated with the proposed Development Code Update. The City has a thorough development review process that is fully documented in the General Plan EIR, and that will remain in place following the proposed project. ' Personal Conversation, James Troyer, Planning Director and Jennifer Nakamura,.ASSOCiate Planner, January 3, 2012. z Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2000061027J, page 3-2. 3 Id. at pages 3-6 through 3-g. Id. at page 3-9. Page 14 of 14 P491 RESOLUTION NO. 12-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING FEES FOR SERVICES RELATED TO APPLICATIONS FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW AND FOR THE MODIFICATION OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows: Section 1. On June 20, 2012 and continued to July 18, 2012, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the adoption of fees for services related to applications for Site Plan Review and for the modification of previously approved land use entitlements and concluded said hearing on that date. Based upon the substantial evidence presented atthat hearing, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby finds as follows: a. The California Government Code allows the City to establish fees and charges for municipal services, provided such fees and charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to the City in providing the service to which the fee or charge applies. b. On September 15, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution 04-293, which set fees for development services and an annual fee adjustment based on the Consumer Price Index. c. As part of the comprehensive update to the Development Code, the City created new administrative processes for Site Plan Review and for the modifcation of previously approved land use entitlements. Resolution 04-293 did not include a fee applicable to services provided in association with Site Plan Review, and set the fee for modifications to previously approved land use entitlements. d. The City has conducted a comprehensive study to determine the costs to providing the services for Site Plan Review and for modifications of previously approved entitlements. Based on the study, the City prepared the proposed fees listed in Attachment 1 to this Resolution, which is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. All data indicating the estimated or actual cost to provide each service for which the fees in Attachment 1 apply was made available to the public on the City's website and at City Hall at least 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing. e:. The City Council finds the fees set forth in Attachment 1 do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fees are levied. Section 2. The fees set forth in Attachment 1 are hereby approved and adopted as the fees and charges applicable to the respective services listed therein, and shall take effect 60 days from the date of adoption of this Resolution. Section 3. Consistent with existing fees approved in Resolution 04-293, each fee set forth in Attachment 1 shall be adjusted annually commencing on October 1, 2012, and each year thereafter, without further action of the City Council, in proportion to the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -Riverside statistical area, during the 12 month period ending on December 31 st of the preceding year. If the Consumer Price Index is discontinued, then the replacement index in use and accepted as the industry and business standard for Southern California, as determined by the City Council, shall be utilized. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 12-101 July 18, 2012 Page 2 Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 18TH DAY OF JULY 2012. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 18th day of July 2012, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: P492 Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P493 Fees for New Services in the Development Code Update Application Current Fee Proposed Fee Conditional Use Permit -Modifcation $2,634 $1,317 Development Agreement -Modification $11,631 $5,815 DevelopmenUDesi n Review- Residential -Modification $11,816 $5,908 Develo menUDesign Review -Residential 4 du's or less -Modification $6,629 $3,314 Develo menUDesi nReview-Commercial/Industrial-Modification $11,379 $5,689 Entertainment Permit -Modification $4,765 $2,383 Minor Development Review -Modification $2,535 $1,268 Tentative Parcel Map -Modification $7,211 $3,606 Tentative Tract Map -Modification $13,250 $6,625 Uniform Sign Program -Modification $1,912 $956 Site Plan Review 0 $98.20 per hour ATTACHMENT 1 • 4 f �.Y■r 4,3) 4-• co c • N 7:11 Oc v i , Co � � r t� • V � a) CI Ada t .4. - '7/gr- )4. iike % N ,, t v t.um L Cl) G C� 0 r'O ° N L CO CD Ct N N 13 al N co U �+ ^ = t Sim o E ..-' ^ L R O c E a o O CL 0 V O_ N � O 0.5 U � � min 2 O >+ O ca 2 _ U 0- aN 1 Q > ^ = 4— O cB N C 13 `_ W Q .a O N "a 2 ° o C C O C = Q CO N N c\J COCD C C13 E ...„..,, >, _ ... c,:, >.. .... .� U CO 7---- Q � Cr) _. � 0. ,.= ., C -CD I& • m O i •fn .C C ..-1 /1 a a) C > Q -in ca cn L '�- C V -a co C CD a� a ca E cp CU C O a.) U - ' = E _ _ g A+ _ (n () > cn to ♦♦++ _ __ CD (i) N C O a to 2 = m = O O O N• .� p M = •C c� -.?� cu o Co o_ Qp Q N co o T_d U U it co co co I ay....- . . - T .-. - .,. ,_ _ a. - a_ . a. • i O a) U O N Q CO r U v a) cu N - a) o0U a C 0 L Vi E O ca U 0 U in � � Oc � ca 'v) a) " 0 — - Cr) � u) N U E co c = co al (CS co >--. U 1.75 pi„=0 U) E ..- 0 E CO • 0 N C -= U C 0 ,,1.4- O �- C� O U 0 E H- (� a_ c O N c E U (� a C C (!) N a) O }' I 5 n Q 5 CO� Oa3 z = -CD � L � t r ,i_i N Alga . N / // { t 4- W MS .I.+ 4--.. > w O W I- ca O in -F.)-- C a) F, •.. t) E Go '— E o O U �u) 4a �_ co ,_ (,) 0 a w = as I= -0 s -0 4— -45 u) seD_ 0 4-- �� O L co w — 0 (75 Ca Cl) 0 0 = (/) o -- >, O CV O o c' cn • la O N 0 a-=0" ID CD cn ca v, O ca nti O .L a) = .2 5}, icu rr. i 0 — � - � 0 < • ' 0 (/) lk----- - ' it La i w a) L = (I) Q s� -E Cl) to sm. - O a) m a) cry) C ow co O .03 O U MI _c cp c � O O O 0 17 E E N E O O o U o 2 V RS wV O -I—. O C N . Cl) ,- (r) N O CO -0 a -0 E ._ W ca o_ co 4-. -0 a) .... c,c, . as 0- ›... 'V C‘ - w u) E to 2 0 0) .i 0) 0) a 0_ :r_ z Ct • • • • Li.:‘,- .. '0*--/ : I a'. . : ^A NNH'V Tilffil._ 'aVNAASaj�lg"A4tdinn�i 6� ^ _ ••� LLa ,:n�nn nM1�:nr: hn nn n n ,R'J , w o na Y NC vim° N • Q NN a) O _ g " C.) C) v L .. E Z W M .1�s11.E 1 y c i, gig P1 :1OliigAn > C3ai ,N.ps.?..i.; r 4.2,2ge,%% COP) "." E N 2VN NN dUQO 4G E20$C sH3oa8 1i/♦ g i t L t z L t 0.,,, 8 L 6 ,,',t pNh ah qh, H Np V gNNV g a) m VG UG GU V LV CV IL (0 eiC o r�173 a) O Iii C 0 CU ° CO RS w = o = " co ••= 0 '... -C U o 0 •— a V W - o cn c U c p p p p Q U_ N o = o `~ -= ap .H / 4-• C Q OU p < = 401 CU N - - • • • . - . -. < r Aga l \ ii a 4114 co U O c O as E a a) Ce Q. ••■ DI =A+ a) W L 4-' = 4D _ > .� cu Ca C °' I ' o .° 0 0 L a) a) `- — O Q Q CZ o_ a N O a) -o -- Q E r C cp = L N a_ - C6 = a) .� p O � O a- C L 4 - - c _ a) O 0 0 0 W a. D G) �r ` ._:: a 11� .1■0 I I I I I I I Z i' ' • • -.A _ , L) - \' ..J ya ' Al '401' t > 1. > Cl) «s CU —+ a) r v' '� o a) o > o a) 1._ O) ca N a, Q 1 • = a) = Q Q Q. a) E }, cu CD U -+� -- N ce CU a) N o U -C Noimi CU Q. E o L- a) w a = o 3 cu o o � CL -a�- cn -Q - c CO C CD 0 — = co — L o U OU c6 Iii (1) o_ cn cn L- = o — a) -I a) 70 = '> o a_ "(7) (7 -0 = to Q) = CD N o o c6 o 0 c1 cv0 C. ZJZ UQ o i • • f • . • • E y - 1 ir k IL. 1 . - CO o 0) 1 0 . s. o o N- CZ 0- o Q N U •E cz 0 o (1) -0 0 r ■ - O 0 °' °' U 0 co a Cl) U 0 0 = � o E E .� .� o -0 = o U CD- CA 0 -= 0) c/) L' Q •E 0 V 0) u, = }. c N o o Cl) • 0 E c ccs 0_ ■� O Q o O co -a a)o_ i CU E E 0 E CL — p o , } o o ti a) a) u) con a) a) o E o a) o cL W D o < Ii `- / ^ • • • O ri i'' 411‘ W 0 s L_L _ 4.• ._ i L a) V (/) CV(Y, O LI o 0 • CO C� r) E -U C6 -- CU = U) W E W 0 E t.,(1.) (7) -0 E cz O a) = 0 (1) 0 L wr , u) ...A_a_ ■t E t& '^ E E L E›.., 0 a) M V E Q a) "' ° ti a a) — ) o 0 M O 13 u) = = CU m .�? I Om • • • • • o' ,k--. Y t R" +ti O E1 >, a) CC N--,._ _ E W Ln ca E 0_ o Q- CD E O -c)' -- Cl) > s_ o = Q a) N— O ° a) 0 0_ U o a)CD IMMO • -4--' 0) Ca 0 (3 M C = 0 ci) =CD to 0 o 1 cz V E a) E -IDo 0- L sa, . � � -�- >1 E O a) CO E U o ca . = — U a) r a) o 0 LO -0 _o = Q o E. a) L T. O O U a) • 4- 0 -73 "E E -0 o " u) a) Ce z < = eL = LT_ %— ,,,a) cz Q) a) 0 V a) - s O • L- 0 ii •CZ 0- a) cn c 0 -0 a) 0 - -0 -0 < UD U) QU O i T I 7-12-2012 Daniel Paul Titus Alta Loma CA 91701 Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 909-510-0722 10500 Civic Center Drive PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Dear Jennifer, Thank you so much for your time and consideration regarding the public draft of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. You have been very helpful and patient in assisting with our questions. I am presenting this on behalf of myself and a group of concerned citizens from Rancho Cucamonga. We have reviewed the Development Code and the Planning Department Staff Report dated, June 20, 2012 and we have provided here an overview of comments and questions for your review and consideration. It is our conclusion that implementation be delayed pending further consideration and public debate. Again, thank you in advance for all your help. Sincerely, Daniel Paul Titus CC: Mayor, Dennis Michael Mayor Pro Tem, Sam Spagnoto Council Members: William Alexander Chuck Buquet Diane Williams Planning/Historic Preservation Commission Chairman, Lou Munoz The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Public Record zn Overview Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Public Draft Section 1: Resolutions Against U.N. Agenda 21 Section 2: Development Code Draft Comments Section 3: Book Publication, U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California Section 1 Resolutions Against U.N . Agenda 21 • Republican National Committee (RNC) • National Federation of Republican Assemblies (NFRA) • San Bernardino GOP (SB GOP) January 13, 2012 Republican National Committee Resolution Exposing United Nations Agenda 21 WHEREAS, the United Nations Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of extreme environmentalism, social engineering, and global political control that was initiated at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development(UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992; and, WHEREAS, the United Nations Agenda 21 is being covertly pushed into local communities throughout the United States of America through the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) through local "sustainable development"policies such as Smart Growth, Wildlands Project, Resilient Cities, Regional Visioning Projects, and other "Green" or"Alternative"projects; and WHEREAS, this United Nations Agenda 21 plan of radical so-called"sustainable development" views the American way of life of private property ownership, single family homes, private car ownership and individual travel choices, and privately owned farms; all as destructive to the environment; and, WHEREAS, according to the United Nations Agenda 21 policy, social justice is described as the right and opportunity of all people to benefit equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment which would be accomplished by socialist/communist redistribution of wealth; and, WHEREAS, according to the United Nations Agenda 21 policy National sovereignty is deemed a social injustice; now therefore be RESOLVED,the Republican National Committee recognizes the destructive and insidious nature of United Nations Agenda 21 and hereby exposes to the public and public policy makers the dangerous intent of the plan; and therefore be it further RESOLVED, that the U.S. government and no state or local government is legally bound by the United Nations Agenda 21 treaty in that it has never been endorsed by the (U.S.) Senate, and therefore be it further RESOLVED,that the federal and state and local governments across the country be well informed of the underlying harmful implications of implementation of United Nations Agenda 21 destructive strategies for"sustainable development" and we hereby endorse rejection of its radical policies and rejection of any grant monies attached to it, and therefore be it further RESOLVED, that upon the approval of this resolution the Republican National Committee shall deliver a copy of this resolution to each of the Republican members of Congress, all Republican candidates for Congress, all Republican candidates for President who qualify for ANC sanctioned debates, and to each Republican state and territorial party office. Chief Sponsor: Helen Van Etten Republican National Committeewoman for Kansas Co-Sponsors:Carolyn McLarty Republican National Committeewoman for Oklahoma Kim Lehman Republican National Committeewoman for Iowa Paul Reynolds Republican National Committeeman for Alabama Demetra DeMonte Republican national Committeewoman for Illinois Solomon Yue Republican National Committeewoman for Oregon Donna Cain Republican National Committeewoman for Oregon Cindy Costa Republican National Committeewoman for South Carolina John Sigler Republican State Chairman for Delaware Steve Scheffler Republican National Committeeman for Iowa Peggy Lambert Republican National Committeewoman for Tennessee Jim Bopp Republican National Committeeman for Indiana Bruce Ash Republican National Committeeman for Arizona DeMarus Carlson Republican National Committeewoman for Nebraska NFRA October 2011 The NFRA has long led the charge to restore conservative values and principles to the RNC, and we believe this is a sign that our message is being heard. The NFRA Board passed a slate of resolutions at the NFRA Presidential Preference Convention in October, including the following on Agenda 21: NFRA RESOLUTION OPPOSING UNITED NATIONS' COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANNING WHEREAS, the National Federation of Republican Assemblies recognizes that the pillars of freedom and liberty are life, liberty and property. As such, we seek to identify those candidates that understand and support these same noble characteristics of our great nation and that it is the combination of these truths that makes America "exceptional"; and WHEREAS, some little known facts about comprehensive land use planning, known as Agenda 21 include, but are not limited to, the following: • The UN's Agenda 21 was revealed to the world at the Rio Earth Summit II in 1992; • Agenda 21 was signed into soft law in 1992 and requires only administrative approval and not legislative approval; • The UN's Agenda 21 was granted administrative approval when President Clinton, through Executive Order, created the first President's Council on Sustainable Development; • The President's Council on Sustainable Development created the domestic plan known as "Sustainable America"; • Official non-Government Organizations known as NGOs are certified through the UN based on their compliance and willingness to institute UN created policies like Agenda 21 and the "Wildlands Project". Examples ofNGOs include, but are not limited to: the Sierra Club, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, American Planning Association, and ICLE1 — Local Governments for Sustainability; formally known as the "International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives."; • GATT,NAFTA and other trade agreements also contain components that are derivatives from the economic components of Agenda 21; • Income redistribution as a form of"economic justice" is a tool to be used by Agenda 21; • Agenda 21 is anti-property rights; • The terms "Sustainable Development", "Smart Growth", "Comprehensive Land Use Plan", and"Sustainable Agriculture" are domestic equivalents of Agenda 21; and • The Global Biodiversity Assessment Report identifies private property ownership, single family homes, traditional agriculture, and consumerism as"unsustainable."; therefore be it RESOLVED, that we, the National Federation of Republican Assemblies (NFRA), oppose the nondomestic policies of Agenda 21 based on failure to recognize private property rights as one of America's cornerstones of freedom and liberty; be it further RESOLVED,that Article one, Section ten of the Constitution prohibits any State or subordinate governmental body from contracting with nondomestic entities such as ICLEI; and be it RESOLVED, that the NFRA shall not endorse a candidate or elected official including the office of President that refuses to oppose the same. Source:http://www.republicanassemblies.org/mc-adopts-resolution-exposing-agenda-21/ The Republican Party art OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Robert F Rego, Chairman www.sbgop.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Robert F Rego, SB GOP Chairman 909.920.6035//chair @sbgop.com Upland, CA—April 26, 2012—The Republican Party of San Bernardino County Passed Resolution Exposing United Nations Agenda 21 "l am proud to see our County participate in the opposition to Agenda 21. We must consider the unintended consequences of such extreme actions, "said SB GOP Chairman Robert Rego. The Republican National Committee approved the resolution exposing Agenda 21 at their Winter Meeting, January 13, 2012. On March 27, 2012, the Republican Party of San Bernardino County passed the same resolution. Please see resolution below: WHEREAS, the United Nations Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of extreme environmentalism, social engineering, and global political control that was initiated at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development(UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992; and, WHEREAS, the United Nations Agenda 21 is being covertly pushed into local communities, especially in the cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Chino Hills and Redlands, throughout the United States of America through the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives(ICLEI)through local "sustainable development" policies such as Smart Growth, Wildlands Project, Resilient Cities, Regional Visioning Projects, and other"Green"or"Alternative" projects; and WHEREAS,this United Nations Agenda 21 plan of radical so-called"sustainable development" views the American way of life of private property ownership, single family homes, private car ownership and individual travel choices, and privately owned farms; all as destructive to the environment; and, WHEREAS, according to the United Nations Agenda 21 policy, social justice is described as the right and opportunity of all people to benefit equally from the resources Paid for by the San Bernardino County Republican Party 222 N.M[ountain Ave.Suite 202,Upland,CA 91786 Office:(909)920-61135 Fn (909)920-4284 State TD#74l886 afforded us by society and the environment which would be accomplished by socialist/communist redistribution of wealth; and, WHEREAS, according to the United Nations Agenda 21 policy National sovereignty is deemed a social injustice; now therefore be it RESOLVED,the San Bernardino County Republican Party recognizes the unconstitutional, destructive and insidious nature of United Nations Agenda 21 and hereby exposes to the public and local public policy makers the dangerous intent of the plan; and therefore be it further RESOLVED,that the U.S. government and no state or local government is legally bound by the United Nations Agenda 21 treaty, and therefore be it further RESOLVED, that the federal and state and local governments across the country be well informed of the underlying harmful implications of implementation of United Nations Agenda 21 destructive strategies for"sustainable development" and we hereby endorse rejection of its radical policies and rejection of any grant monies attached to it, and therefore be it further RESOLVED, that upon the approval of this resolution the San Bernardino County Republican Party shall deliver a copy of this resolution to each San Bernardino County Supervisor, and to each mayor of every incorporated city in San Bernardino County, and in the form of a press release to local media outlets. Section 2 Rancho Cucamonga A. Sustainable Development in California B. Development Code Draft Comments A. Sustainable Development in California Two bills are destroying personal property rights and reshaping every aspect of society in California. United Nations Agenda 21 is being instituted through: • The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006- (A832) • The California Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 - (S8375) The California Global Warming Solutions Act is a scheme to regulate air. The California Sustainable Communities and Climate Control Act's long-term goal is to reduce standards of living by limiting access to public wilderness areas, removing roads, controlling air human's breath, and rationing utility usage. The bills have come under criticism as derivatives being driven by Agenda 21. The primary problem is they impede on Constitutional rights. Therefore, governments are reviewing their General Plans, ordinances and eminent domain laws and many are now challenging the hubris of the States and the Federal Government who are implementing laws linked to U.N. Agenda 21. Many are opting out of this new form of government and centrally planned society -The Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Draft exhibits many attributes from AB32 and SB375. B. Development Code Draft Comments Page 17.18.4 F. Owner Consent. Owner consent is not required for a structure or property to be designated as a Point of Historic Interest, Historic Landmark, or Contributing Resource. However, a structure or property cannot be designated as either a Historic Landmark or a Contributing Resource over the owner's objection unless the Council makes all of the following findings: 1. The structure or property is on the City's historical inventory. 2. The structure or property possesses exceptional architectural, historical, aesthetic, or cultural qualities. 3. Designation will preserve or protect the exceptional qualities of the structure or property. Comment Property rights issue: Conflicts with Constitutional Fifth Amendment regarding eminent domain;potential litigation and costs to taxpayers. We encourage that this be stricken from the code. Page 17.18-5 Section 17.18.030 Maintenance of Historic Resources A. Maintenance Responsibility. The owner, occupant, or other person having legal custody and control of a historic resource, defined as a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource, shall keep the resource in good repair all exterior portions thereof, all interior portions thereof regulated by the applicable designation statement or adopted conservation plan, and all interior portions thereof whose maintenance is necessary to prevent deterioration and decay of any exterior architectural feature. B. Required Maintenance. The owner, occupant, or other person having legal custody and control of a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource shall promptly repair such building or structure consistent with all other applicable local, State, and Federal laws, if it is found to have any of the following defects as determined by the Building and Safety Official: 1. Building elements in danger of falling and injuring persons or property. 2. Deteriorated or inadequate foundation. 3. Defective or deteriorated flooring. 4. Walls, partitions, or other vertical supports that split, lean, list, buckle, or are otherwise failing due to defective material or deterioration. 5. Ceilings, roofs, roof supports, or other horizontal members that sag, split, buckle, or are otherwise failing due to defective materials or deterioration. 6. Fireplaces or chimneys that list, bulge, settle, or are otherwise failing due to defective material or deterioration. 7. Deteriorated, crumbling, or loose exterior plaster. 8. Deteriorated or ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roofs, foundations or floors, including but not limited to broken windows or doors. 9. Defective or insufficient weather protection for exterior wall coverings, including lack of paint or weathering due to lack of paint or other protective covering. 10. Any fault, defect, or deterioration in the building that renders it structurally unsafe or insufficiently watertight. Comment: This appears to be overreaching. The Owner has all responsibility but no authority of ownership of private property. Property rights issue: Conflicts with Constitutional Fifth Amendment Rights regarding eminent domain;potential litigation and costs to taxpayers. We encourage that this be stricken from the code. Page 17.46-3 K. Land Donation. Nothing in this Chapter shall be construed to enlarge or diminish the authority of the City to require a developer to donate land as a condition of development. Comment:A requirement to `donate'land? We recommend that this be removed from the code. Section 17.50 Section 17.50.010 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to implement the sustainable planning and design provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The provisions of this chapter are intended to encourage developers to go above and beyond typical development practices by: creating incentives for compact, mixed-use development; encouraging use of alternative energy sources; promote alternative means of transportation (e.g. bicycling, walking, transit); creating incentive to reduce energy use; and facilitating low impact development techniques. The provisions contained within this Chapter are to be used in combination other provisions within Article IV (Site Development Provisions) and the adopted CalGreen Building Code. Comment: This sections states, "The purpose of this Chapter is to implement the sustainable planninq...to encourage developers to go above and beyond typical development practices by: creating incentives for compact, mixed-use development; encouraging use of alternative energy sources;promote alternative means of transportation (e.g. bicycling, walking, transit); creating incentive to reduce energy use..." The code states, "...to encourage developers to go above and beyond typical development practices..." • Does "go above and beyond"mean voluntary? • What is `typical development'? • Why isn't 'typical development'acceptable? We agree with the following RNC resolution statement sustainable development and planning: "RESOLUTION:that the federal and state and local governments across the country be well informed of the underlying harmful implications of implementation of United Nations Agenda 21 destructive strategies for"sustainable development"and we hereby endorse rejection of its radical policies and rejection of any grant monies attached to it..." Page 17.50-2 Section 17.50.030 Incentives The City recognizes that implementing the optional provisions of CalGreen results in additional building and site construction cost and offers the incentives below to help offset the cost. The eligibility for the following incentive shall be determined during the related entitlement review process as follows: A. RC Green 100. All buildings achieving CalGreen Tier 1 or 100 points or more on the relevant Green Building Code Compliance Matrix as maintained by the Planning Director shall be eligible for priority processing of the proposed development. B. RC Green 200. All buildings achieving CalGreen Tier 2 or 200 points or more on the relevant Green Building Code Compliance Matrix as maintained by the Planning Director shall be eligible for: 1. Priority Processing; 2. Reduction in the site development standards or architectural design requirements, including but not limited to: i. Reduction in setback; ii. Reduction in square footage requirements; and/or Hi. Reduction in required number of parking spaces. Comments: • If CalGreen is voluntary why have incentives? • Will it CalGreen be a requirement in the future and what standards do these replace? • What are the costs to implement these standards in increased costs for certifications, etc.? Because Chapter 17.50 is being implemented through SB375 and therefore is derivative of Agenda 21 we, recommend that 17.50 be removed from the code. Page 17.68-16 C. Bicycle Lockers. Where required bicycle parking is provided in lockers, the lockers must be securely anchored. D. Bicycle Racks. Required bicycle parking may be provided in floor, wall, or ceiling racks. Where required bicycle parking is provided with racks, the racks must meet the following requirements: 1. The bicycle frame and one wheel can be locked to the rack with a highsecurity U-shaped shackle lock if both wheels are left on the bicycle. 2. A bicycle six feet (6') long can be securely held with its frame supported so that the bicycle cannot be pushed or fall in a manner that will damage the wheels or components. 3. The rack must be securely anchored. E. Special Requirements for Long-Term Bicycle Parking. Mixed-use and highdensity residential development have special long-term bicycle parking needs. As such, required spaces for such uses shall be designed and located to maximize security in one or more of the following locations/ways: 1. In a locked room. 2. In an area that is enclosed by a fence with a locked gate. The fence must be either eight feet (8') high or be floor to ceiling. 3. Within view of an attendant, security guard, or employee work area. 4. In an area that is monitored by a security camera. Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article IV, Chapter 17.68 Public Draff 17.68-17 5. Within a dwelling unit, dormitory, or other group housing unit, live/work unit, or artists studio. If provided within a unit, racks or lockers are not required. F. Parking and Maneuvering Areas. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle. There must be an aisle at least five feet (5') wide adjacent to all required bicycle parking to allow room for bicycle maneuvering. Where the bicycle parking is adjacent to a sidewalk, the maneuvering area may extend into the right-of-way. The area devoted to bicycle parking must be hard surfaced. G. Visibility. If required bicycle parking is not visible from the street or main building entrance, a sign must be posted at the main building entrance indicating the location of the bicycle parking. Section 17.68.110 Maintenance The minimum number of parking spaces required in this Chapter shall be provided and continuously maintained. A parking, loading, or bicycle parking area provided for the purpose of complying with the requirements of this Chapter shall not be eliminated, reduced, or converted unless equivalent facilities approved by the approving authority are provided elsewhere in compliance with this Chapter. Comment: The purpose and goal here seems to motivate bicycle usage; however, this seems to be overdone and looks to be an expensive option. Again, this is outlined in SB375, as an attempt to legislate human behavior. The goal: Get people to except bicycles and walking as the preferred mode of transportation. • Ever look at a grade school with all those empty bike racks?Parents deem it too dangerous for children to ride bicycles to school. • Where is the evidence that the expense of this system will produce any benefits? • How many biker riders are there in Rancho Cucamonga? • What are the demographics of bike riders? • In a city that promotes its heritage to `Route 66"and given that Southern California is defined by popular culture of the automobile we doubt that this will muster in the long- run. Therefore, it is our recommendation that Section 17.68.100 and Section 1768.110 be removed from the code. Section 17.80.020 Special Development Criteria Comment: We agree with Carlos Rodriquez of The Building Industry Association of Southern California: "...The current and future technology of solar energy systems should not determine lot orientation for future projects. Use and lot alignments should be determined by the site, not the future use of solar. Likewise, it seems overly restrictive to record easements for solar that limit what a homeowner can do with their yard." This is a Property rights issue: Conflicts with Constitutional Fifth Amendment regarding eminent domain;potential litigation and costs to taxpayers. We encourage that this be stricken from the code. Page17.84.4 Section 17.84.060 Tree Maintenance A. The maintenance of trees standing upon private or homeowner-owned property shall be the responsibility of the owner or owners of those properties. B. All trees on public and private property, within residential or commercial areas shall be maintained in accordance with industry standards and in accordance with the International Society of Arboriculture or ANZI 133.1 standards. C. Builders shall be required to prune, treat, and maintain existing trees and plant new ones in such a fashion that when the trees become City, association, or private property, the trees will be free of various damage, pests, diseases, and dead branches. The trees shall be in good biological and aesthetic condition upon acceptance. D. To ensure adequate and uniform maintenance, eucalyptus windrows should be maintained in a manner that preserves the aesthetics and history of the eucalyptus windrows. E. Pruning prior to transfer of mature eucalyptus windrows to the City, associations, or private owners must be done by builders as follows: 1. Leaves, debris, dead branches, and suckers accumulated along the base of the windrow shall be removed periodically, or as may be necessary for reasons of public health and safety. 2. Dead or decaying branches shall be removed, trunks stripped, and tree structure trimmed at least every four(4) years or as may be necessary for reasons of public health and safety as well as aesthetics. 3. Trees should be trimmed to preserve their natural structure. 4. Unsightly or poorly crotched limbs and heavily leaning branches shall be removed. 5. All cuts are to be made flush and/or in line with proper arboricultural practices. 6. Dead, diseased, or dying trees shall be removed as may be necessary and shall be replaced with fifteen (15) gallon Eucalyptus maculate. F. Young eucalyptus windrow trees shall be maintained, fertilized, and irrigated as may be necessary to sustain them in health condition. Dead trees shall be replaced with same species of appropriate size; replacement trees need not exceed fifteen (15) gallon size. Comment: Trees on private property are owned by the homeowners, and therefore, should be exempt from any regulations mitigating property rights. • What are the currents costs to implement and enforce these rules? We agree with 'Section 17.84.060(A) above, and disagree with all other rules in this section. Property rights issue: Conflicts with Constitutional Fifth Amendment regarding eminent domain; potential litigation and costs to taxpayers. We encourage that this be stricken from the code. Page 17.86-4 3. All irrigation systems shall include: i. A smart irrigation controller, or other equivalent technology, which automatically adjusts the frequency and/or duration of irrigation events in response to changing weather conditions shall be required. The planting areas shall be grouped and irrigated in relation to hydrozones based on similarity of water requirements (i.e. turf separate from shrub and groundcover, full sun exposure areas separate from shade areas; top of slope separate from toe of slope). Comment: The above section is too vague and open to interpretation: California Assembly Bill No. 1881, CHAPTER 559, Page 7 "... (2) Consider the Irrigation Association's Smart Water Application Technology Program testing protocols when adopting performance standards for landscape irrigation equipment, including, but not limited to, irrigation controllers, moisture sensors, emission devices, and valves." AB1881 states, "...consider, the smart irrigation controller..." This does not appear to be a mandatory requirement according to this bill. If smart irrigation controllers have microprocessors and transmitters in them to transmit data to central data collection stations, like Edison Smart Meters; then more than likely be lawsuits filed. • What is the success with the different kinds of Smart Irrigation systems on the market? • What is the reliability of these kinds of systems? • Will these systems be subsidized? • What additional costs will this add to a new single family residence? • Why not provide a potential a "gray-water diversions system", whereby shower/sink/dishwater are captured and used for irrigation? We believe that this should be removed from the code. Page 17.100-1 Section 17.100.010 Purpose and Findings The City Council finds that Federal and State laws prohibiting the possession, sale, and distribution of marijuana would preclude the lawful opening and operation of medical marijuana dispensaries sanctioned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and in order to serve the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents and businesses within the City, the declared purpose of this Chapter is to prohibit the operation or establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries within the City, as provided in this Chapter. Comment: To our knowledge, there are Federal Laws regarding the cultivation, distribution, sale and consumption of marijuana; however, for medical purposes, it is legal in California. Therefore, the aforementioned statement is a paradox, and lends any contention on the issue to potential litigation and costs to taxpayers. Our conclusion is that this needs further consideration and public debate to come up with a better solution in this matter. II ,rU . N . Agenda� i 1 . . 2 'Sustainable Development 1 n C t o�� nza; :� % ,;. ��;� �� -7 _,, �� \ „,, __ \ ,..„ _,.._, „,___+ tv` v.-, �_x ice, _ - ,/'/^.„ f;-�� -.�,/..„./.„_ __:. __< ,____ ,_ ,...._ , k0t<o"t.eN. ® S ®® ® / fl : ice ���� /\ ®ir et I es*elk acc--, __\ ; \, _ , ®®��`�\`I lejam®s�o®a I -> ®®sue_ �!olio ® �rsier////1111\\\\� �'�® ariOr* mina% \NVTAinlitis 1 -,_ - -I:, ---- - yrs e# Sima Pt*/ as•s4a MKS it** :, ;, tri7:6_- - ____, 6.7,#aetelaillitia • ils• \Y\, ' - ' T-1 -21- r-4 clan 0 4 . , . . _ L -A--Irtit _, MIS.11,14.10trt , .4,\-, , ___ rat \ saiimmtpr - 1.-tic-- --, c-___, _______ , itAlrajala a 1110110040, ,- ---Nr4_____,.(e,-^, ;.----CT--,:-,--4 --3\:;;;SS,jf,' Contents Overview & Intro Section 1 : The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 Section 2: California Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 1 Published by Monolith Press Compilation and layout design by Paul Daniels ISBN 1-158291-116-9 i Copyright©2012 Monolith Press. All government copy is public domain. Overview Intro Overview & Intro "... The growth of world population and production combined with unsustainable consumption patterns places increasingly severe stress on the life-supporting capacities of our planet.. Rapidly growing cities, unless well-managed,face major environmental problems...cities calls for greater attention to - --- -- issues of local government and municipal management The human dimensions are key elements to consider... and they should be adequately taken into consideration in comprehensive policies for sustainable development." - U.N. Agenda 21, Chapter 5 U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California i.1 Intro Overview Agenda 21 is a United Nations (U.N.) plan for a new form of glob- al government. It was signed by 178 world leaders, including the US President, at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. This new form of government is known as Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development views the American way of life as wasteful and greedy and teaches that man is living beyond the Earth's carrying capaci- ty. While often promoted as environmental stewardship or simply "going green" the true nature of Sustainable Development is actually about con- trolling the Earth's resources. Sustainable Development consists of three linked components: 1. Environment, 2. Economy, and 3. Social Equity. In a world governed by this new system all human activity must balance these three components perfectly in order to be considered sustainable or allowable. Therefore, everything we do in our daily lives must come under increasing governmental control in order to protect the planet and maintain sustainability. Policies that are connected to Agenda 21 and sus- tainable development are currently being put into place nationwide and globally at all levels of government and within all sectors of society to regulate our behavior. Numerous aspects of American life are subject to scrutiny under this radi- cal new philosophy. Where and how we build our homes, the products we use, the foods we eat, and the methods of transportation we choose, are just a few examples of American life that United Nations Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development seek to bring under a supra-national control. Collectivism in its many forms have one major goal in common: Get rid of individual property rights. Steps in the plan are: I Step 1: Catalog and collec all property for the people. i i I Step 2: Distribute all property to the people. Step 3: Cancel step 2. California has implemented two bills that are precursors to implemeting Agenda 21 in the state: 1.2 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California Overview Intro 1. The California Global Warming Solutions Act 2. California Sustainable Communities and Clinate Protection Act The California Global Warming Solutions Act is a scheme to regulate carbon in air. The California Sustainable Communities Act's long-term goal is to stop and remove rual development and then remove access to these areas. The bills in this publication have both come under fire as derivatives and being driven by Agenda 21. The primary problem is they impede on Constitutional rights. For example, the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution states `...private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. 'Therefore, governments are reviewing their Genearal Plans, ordinances and eminent domain laws and many arenow challenging the hubris of the states and the Federal Government regarding who are implementing bills linked to Agenda 21. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - unelected offcials - is the major driver for Agenda 21 at the Federal level. It offers grants to states, counties, and cities, inorder to bate them into accepting its terms. It may be too late for California; however, the American public is wak- ing up and educating public officials about Agenda 21. Furthermore, states, counties, and cities are opting out of Agenda 21 programs. The National Republican Party and the California San Bernardino Republican Party have come out with resolutions against Agenda 21 and its rhetoric: sustainable development, smart growth, biodiversity, agricultural land trusts, blight— another word for eminent domain, community develop- ment, harmony, collaboration, partnerships, public/private partnerships aka economic prosperity, density—meaning dwelling/housing density, environmental justice, Green, human rights, income re-distribution, infill development, livable communities, multi-species habitat and corridor plans. At the same time that business and industry are embracing sustainability buzz, many state and local governments are backing away from the scheme. Why? Property rights. For example, a bill to bar the state from taking over private property without due process passed the House on a 96-0 vote in Alabama: "...Senate Bill 477, sponsored by Sen. Gerald Dial, R-Lineville, is intended to shelter Alabamians from the United Nations Agenda 21, a sustainable development initiative viewed as a Trojan horse for the creation of a world government." U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 1.3 California Global Warming Solutions Act AB32 California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32) "... Global warming poses a serious threat to the econom- icwell-being, public health, natural resources, and the envi- ronment of California...Global warming will have detrimen- tal effects on some of California's largest industries...National and international actions are necessary, .. --to fully address the issue of global warming..." U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California 1.1 AB32 California Global Warming Solutions Act The following is a complete bill. Sidebars include highlights from the original document. 385111(a-e) The people of the State of California do enact as follows: Global warming poses a serious SECTION 1. Division 25.5 (commencing with Section threat...potential 38500) is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read: adverse impacts of global warm- DIVISION 25.5. CALIFORNIA GLOBAL WARMING ing... SOLUTIONS ACT OF 2006 Global warming PART 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS will have detri- mental Chapter 1. Title of Division effects...Califotnia . has long been a 38500. This division shall be known, and may be cited, as the national and international California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. leader on energy Chapter 2. Findings and Declarations conservation and environmental 38501. The Legislature finds and declares all of the stewardship... following: The program (a) Global warming poses a serious threat to the economicwell-being, established by public health, natural resources, and the environment of California. The this division will potential adverse impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of continue this tra- air quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the dition of environ- state from the Sierra snowpack, a rise in sea levels resulting in the dis- mental leadership by placing placement of thousands of coastal businesses and residences, damage to California at the marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and an increase forefront of in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human national and health-related problems. international efforts to (b) Global warming will have detrimental effects on some of California's reduce emissions largest industries, including agriculture, wine, tourism, skiing, recreation- of greenhouse al and commercial fishing, and forestry. It will also increase the strain on gases. electricity supplies necessary to meet the demand for summer air-condi- tioning in the hottest parts of the state. (c) California has long been a national and international leader on energy conservation and environmental stewardship efforts, including the areas of air quality protections, energy efficiency requirements, renewable energy standards, natural resource conservation, and greenhouse gas 1.2 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Global Warming Solutions Act AB32 emission standards for passenger vehicles. The program established by 38501 (d-g) this division will continue this tradition of environmental leadership by National and placing California at the forefront of national and international efforts to international reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. actions are nec- essary..By exer- (d) National and international actions are necessary to fully address the cising a global issue of global warming. However, action taken by California to reduce leadership role... to benefit from emissions of greenhouse gases will have far-reaching effects by encour- national and aging other states, the federal government, and other countries to act. international efforts to reduce (e) By exercising a global leadership role, California will also position its emissions of economy, technology centers, financial institutions, and businesses to greenhouse benefit from national and international efforts to reduce emissions of gases...will pro- greenhouse gases. More importantly, investing in the development of vide an opportu- innovative and pioneering technologies will assist California in achieving nity for the state the 2020 statewide limit on emissions of greenhouse gases established by to take a global this division and will provide an opportunity for the state to take economic and a global economic and technological leadership role in reducing technological emissions of greenhouse gases. leadership role in � g reducing emissions of (f) It is the intent of the Legislature that the State Air Resources Board greenhouse coordinate with state agencies, as well as consult with the environmental gases.... justice community, industry sectors, business groups, academic institu- tions, environmental organizations, and other stakeholders in implement- intent that the ing this division. State Air Resources Board (g) It is the intent of the Legislature that the State Air Resources Board coordinate with consult with the Public Utilities Commission in the development of emis- state agencies, sions reduction measures, including limits on emissions of greenhouse as well as consult with the environ- gases applied to electricity and natural gas providers regulated by the mental justice Public Utilities Commission in order to ensure that electricity and natural community.. gas providers are not required to meet duplicative or inconsistent regulatory requirements. environmental organizations, (h) It is the intent of the Legislature that the State Air Resources Board and other stake- design emissions reduction measures to meet the statewide emissions holders...consult limits for greenhouse gases established pursuant to this division in a man- with the Public ner that minimizes costs and maximizes benefits for California's econo- Utilities my, improves and modernizes California's energy infrastructure and Commission in maintains electric system reliability, maximizes additional environmental the development of emissions and economic co-benefits for California, and complements the state's reduction meas- efforts to improve air quality. ures. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 1.3 AB32 California Global Warming Solutions Act (i) It is the intent of the Legislature that the Climate Action Team estab lished by the Governor to coordinate the efforts set forth under Executive Order S-3-05 continue its role in coordinating overall climate policy. 38501 (h-i) It is the intent of Chapter 3. Definitions the Legislature... design emissions 38505. For the purposes of this division, the following terms have the reduction meas- following meanings: ures...in a man- ner that mini- (a) "Allowance" means an authorization to emit, during a specified year, mizes costs and up to one ton of carbon dioxide equivalent. maximizes bene- fits... (b) "Alternative compliance mechanism" means an action It is the intent of undertaken by a greenhouse gas emission source that achieves the equiv- the Legislature alent reduction of greenhouse gas emissions over the same time period as that the Climate a direct emission reduction, and that is approved by the state board. Action Team stab "Alternative compliance mechanism" includes, but is not limited to, a fished by the flexible compliance schedule, alternative control technology, a process Governor to coor- change, or a product substitution. dinate the efforts set forth under (c) "Carbon dioxide equivalent" means the amount of carbon dioxide by Executive Order weight that would produce the same global warming impact as a given S-3 continue weight of another greenhouse gas, based on the best available science, its role in coordi- nating overall cli- including from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. mate policy. (d) "Cost-effective" or "cost-effectiveness" means the cost per unit of reduced emissions of greenhouse gases adjusted for its global warming potential. (e) "Direct emission reduction" means a greenhouse gas emission reduc- tion action made by a greenhouse gas emission source at that source. (f) "Emissions reduction measure" means programs, measures, standards, and alternative compliance mechanisms authorized pursuant to this divi- sion, applicable to sources or categories of sources, that are designed to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. (g) "Greenhouse gas" or "greenhouse gases" includes all of the following gases: carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, per- fluorocarbons, and sulfur hexaflouride. 1.4 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Global Warming Solutions Act AB32 (h) "Greenhouse gas emissions limit" means an authorization, during a specified year, to emit up to a level of greenhouse gases specified by the 38505(c) state board, expressed in tons of carbon dioxide equivalents. 'Carbon dioxide equivalent" (i) "Greenhouse gas emission source" or "source" means any source, or means the category of sources, of greenhouse gas emissions whose emissions are at amount of carbon a level of significance, as determined by the state board, that its participa- dioxide by weight tion in the program established under this division will enable the state that would pro- board to effectively reduce greenhouse gas emissions and monitor com- duce the same pliance with the statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit. global warming impact as a given weight of another (j) "Leakage" means a reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases within greenhouse gas. the state that is offset by an increase in emissions of greenhouse gases based on the outside the state. best available science, including (k) "Market-based compliance mechanism" means either of the follow- from the ing: Intergovernmenta I Panel on (I) A system of market-based declining annual aggregate emissions limi- Climate Change. tations for sources or categories of sources that emit greenhouse gases. 38505(2)(c) Greenhouse gas (2) Greenhouse gas emissions exchanges, banking, credits, and other emissions transactions, governed by rules and protocols established by the state exchanges, bank- board, that result in the same greenhouse gas emission reduction, over the ing, credits, and same time period, as direct compliance with a greenhouse gas emission other transac- limit or emission reduction measure adopted by the state board pursuant tions, governed to this division. by rules and pro- tocols... (I) "State board" means the State Air Resources Board. "Statewide green- (m) "Statewide greenhouse gas emissions" means the total annual emis- . gas emis- (m) sions"means the sions of greenhouse gases in the state, including all emissions of green- total annual emis- house gases from the generation of electricity delivered to and consumed sions of green- in California, accounting for transmission and distribution line losses, house gases in whether the electricity is generated in state or imported. Statewide emis- the state...elec- sions shall be expressed in tons of carbon dioxide equivalents. tricity delivered to and consumed in (n) "Statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit" or "statewideemissions California... limit" means the maximum allowable level of statewide greenhouse gas emissions in 2020, as determined by the state board pursuant to Part 3 (commencing with Section 38850). U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 1.5 AB32 California Global Warming Solutions Act 38510 Chapter 4. Role of State Board The State Air Resources Board 38510. The State Air Resources Board is the state agency charged with is the state monitoring and regulating sources of emissions of greenhouse gases that agency charged cause global warming in order to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. with monitoring and regulating PART 2. MANDATORY GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS source...that cause global REPORTING warming... 38530. (a) On or before January 1, 2008, the state board shall adopt regu- 38503(1-2) lations to require the reporting and verification of statewide greenhouse annual reporting gas emissions and to monitor and enforce compliance with this program. of greenhouse gas emissions (b) The regulations shall do all of the following: from greenhouse gas emission (1) Require the monitoring and annual reporting of greenhouse gas emis- sources... sions from greenhouse gas emission sources beginning with the sources Account for greenhouse gas or categories of sources that contribute the most to statewide emissions. emissions from • all electricity con- (2) Account for greenhouse gas emissions from all electricity consumed sumed in the in the state, including transmission and distribution line losses from elec- state. all retail tricity generated within the state or imported from outside the state. This sellers of electric- requirement applies to all retail sellers of electricity, including load-serv- ity...local publicly ing entities as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 380 of the Public owned electric Utilities Code and local publicly owned electric utilities as defined in utilities... Section 9604 of the Public Utilities Code. 38503(3) (3) Where appropriate and to the maximum extent feasible, incorporate ...incorporate the standards and the standards and protocols developed by the California Climate Action protocols devel- Registry, established pursuant to Chapter 6 (commencing with Section oped by the 42800) of Part 4 of Division 26. Entities that voluntarily participated in California Climate the California Climate Action Registry prior to December 31, 2006, Action Registry... and have developed a greenhouse gas emission reporting program, shall not be required to significantly alter their reporting or verification pro- ...reporting gram except as necessary to ensure that reporting is complete and verifi- tools...compre- able for the purposes of compliance with this division as determined by hensive the state board. records...and review... (4) Ensure rigorous and consistent accounting of emissions, and provide reporting tools and formats to ensure collection of necessary data. (5) Ensure that greenhouse gas emission sources maintain comprehensive records of all reported greenhouse gas emissions. 1.6 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Global Warming Solutions Act AB32 (c) The state board shall do both of the following: 38550 ...the state board (1) Periodically review and update its emission reporting requirements, as shall, after one or necessary. more public work- shops, with public (2) Review existing and proposed international, federal, and state green- notice, and an house gas emission reporting programs and make reasonable efforts to opportunity for all interested parties promote consistency among the programs established pursuant to this to comment, part and other programs, and to streamline reporting requirements on determine what greenhouse gas emission sources. the statewide greenhouse gas PART 3. STATEWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS emissions level LIMIT was in 1990... 38550. By January 1, 2008, the state board shall, after one or more public 38551(a-c) workshops, with public notice, and an opportunity for all interested par- The statewide ties to comment, determine what the statewide greenhouse gas emissions greenhouse gas level was in 1990, and approve in a public hearing, a statewide green- emissions limit shall remain in house gas emissions limit that is equivalent to that level, to be achieved effect unless oth- by 2020. In order to ensure the most accurate determination feasible, erwise amended the state board shall evaluate the best available scientific, technological, orrepealed... and economic information on greenhouse gas emissions to determine the 1990 level of greenhouse gas emissions. maintain and continue reduc- 38551. tions in emissions (a) The statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit shall remain in effect of greenhouse unless otherwise amended or repealed. gases beyond 2020... (b) It is the intent of the Legislature that the statewide greenhouse gas make recommen- emissions limit continue in existence and be used to maintain and contin- dations to the ue reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases beyond 2020. Governor and the Legislature on (c) The state board shall make recommendations to the Governor and the how to continue Legislature on how to continue reductions of greenhouse gas emissions reductions of beyond 2020. greenhouse gas emissions PART 4. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS beyond 2020. 38560. The state board shall adopt rules and regulations in an open public process to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effec- tive greenhouse gas emission reductions from sources or categories of sources, subject to the criteria and schedules set forth in this part. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 1.7 AB32 California Global Warming Solutions Act 38560 38560.5. The state board (a) On or before June 30, 2007, the state board shall publish and make shall adopt rules available to the public a list of discrete early action greenhouse gas emis- and regulations in sion reduction measures that can be implemented prior to the measures an open public and limits adopted pursuant to Section 38562. process... 38560.5(a-c) (b) On or before January 1, 2010, the state board shall adopt regulations ....list of discrete to implement the measures identified on the list published pursuant to early action subdivision (a) greenhouse gas . emission reduc- (c) The regulations adopted by the state board pursuant to this section tion measures... shall achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective shall achieve the reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from those sources or categories maximum techno- of sources, in furtherance of achieving the statewide greenhouse gas logically feasible emissions limit. and cost-effective reductions in greenhouse gas (d) The regulations adopted pursuant to this section shall be enforceable emissions... no later than January 1, 2010. 38561(a) 38561. ...prepare and (a) On or before January 1, 2009, the state board shall prepare and approve a stop- approve a scoping plan, as that term is understood by the state board, for ing plan...for achieving the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective reduc- achieving the tions in greenhouse gas emissions from sources or categories of sources maximum techno- of greenhouse gases by 2020 under this division. The state board shall logically feasible consult with all state agencies with jurisdiction over sources of green- and cost-effective house gases, including the Public Utilities Commission and the State reductions in greenhouse gas Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, on all emissions... elements of its plan that pertain to energy related matters including, but not limited to, electrical generation, load based-standards or require- The state board ments, the provision of reliable and affordable electrical service, petrole- shall consult with urn refining, and statewide fuel supplies to ensure the greenhouse gas all state agen- emissions reduction activities to be adopted and implemented by the state cies...including board are complementary, nonduplicative, and can be implemented in an the Public Utilities efficient and cost-effective manner. Commission and the State Energy (b) The plan shall identify and make recommendations on direct emission Resources reduction measures, alternative compliance mechanisms, market-based Conservation and Development compliance mechanisms, and potential monetary and nonmonetary incen- Cornmission... tives for sources and categories of sources that the state board finds are necessary or desirable to facilitate the achievement of the maximum fea- sible and cost-effective reductions of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. 1.8 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Global Warming Solutions Act AB32 (c) In making the determinations required by subdivision (b), the state 38561(c-h) board shall consider all relevant information pertaining to greenhouse gas ...the state board emissions reduction programs in other states, localities, and nations, shall consider all including the northeastern states of the United States, Canada, and the relevant informa- European Union. ton pertaining to greenhouse gas (d) The state board shall evaluate the total potential costs and total poten- emissions reduc- tion programs in tial economic and noneconomic benefits of the plan for reducing green- other states, house gases to California's economy, environment, and public health, localities, and using the best available economic models, emission estimation tech- nations, including niques, and other scientific methods. the northeastern states of the (e) In developing its plan, the state board shall take into account the rela- United States, tive contribution of each source or source category to statewide green- Canada, and the house gas emissions, and the potential for adverse effects on small busi- European Union. nesses, and shall recommend a de minimis threshold of greenhouse gas emissions below which emission reduction requirements will not apply. board shall evaluate the total potential (f) In developing its plan, the state board shall identify opportunities for costs...potential emission reductions measures from all verifiable and enforceable volun- for adverse tary actions, including, but not limited to, carbon sequestration projects effects on small and best management practices. businesses (g) The state board shall conduct a series of public workshops to give ...board shall interested parties an opportunity to comment on the plan. The state board identify opportuni- shall conduct a portion of these workshops in regions of the state that ties for emission have the most significant exposure to air pollutants, including, but not reductions limited to, communities with minority populations, communities with carbon segues- low-income populations, or both. ...board projects ...board shall conduct a series (h) The state board shall update its plan for achieving the maximum tech- of public work- . nologically feasible and cost-effective reductions of greenhouse gas emis- shops to give sions at least once every five years. interested parties an opportunity to 38562. comment on the (a) On or before January 1, 2011, the state board shall adopt greenhouse plan. gas emission limits and emission reduction measures by regulation to ...update its achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective reduc- plan...at least tions in greenhouse gas emissions in furtherance of achieving the once every five statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit, to become operative beginning years. on January 1, 2012. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 1.9 AB32 California Global Warming Solutions Act 38562(a-c) (b) In adopting regulations pursuant to this section and Part 5 (commenc- ...to achieve the ing with Section 38570), to the extent feasible and in furtherance of maximum techno- achieving the statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit, the state board logically feasible shall do all of the following: and cost-effective reductions in (1) Design the regulations, including distribution of emissions allowances greenhouse gas emissions... where appropriate, in a manner that is equitable, seeks to minimize costs Design the regu- and maximize the total benefits to California, and encourages early action lations...in a man- to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. ner that is equi- table, seeks to (2) Ensure that activities undertaken to comply with the regulations do minimize costs not disproportionately impact low-income communities. and maximize the total benefits... (3) Ensure that entities that have voluntarily reduced their greenhouse gas emissions prior to the implementation of this section receive appropriate do not interfere credit for early voluntary reductions. with, efforts to achieve and maintain federal (4) Ensure that activities undertaken pursuant to the regulations comple- and state ambient ment, and do not interfere with, efforts to achieve and maintain federal air quality stan- and state ambient air quality standards and to reduce toxic air contami- dards... nant emissions. Consider cost- (5) Consider cost-effectiveness of these regulations. effectiveness of these regula- (6) Consider overall societal benefits, including reductions in other air tons.. pollutants, diversification of energy sources, and other benefits to the overall societal economy, environment, and public health. benefits....and other benefits to the economy.. (7) Minimize the administrative burden of implementing and complying with these regulations. Minimize the administrative (8) Minimize leakage. burden of imple- menting and (9) Consider the significance of the contribution of each source or cate- complying with gory of sources to statewide emissions of greenhouse gases. these regulations ...the state board (c) In furtherance of achieving the statewide greenhouse gas emissions may adopt a reg- limit, by January 1, 2011, the state board may adopt a regulation that ulation that estab- lishes a system establishes a system of market-based declining annual aggregate emission of market-based limits for sources or categories of sources that emit greenhouse gas emis- declining annual sions, applicable from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020, inclusive, aggregate emis- that the state board determines will achieve the maximum technologically sion limits... feasible and cost-effective reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, in the 1.10 _U.N. Agenda 21: California Global Warming Solutions Act AB32 aggregate, from those sources or categories of sources. 38562(d-f) Any regulation (d)Any regulation adopted by the state board pursuant to this part or Part adopted by the 5 (commencing with Section 38570) shall ensure all of the following: state board...shall (1) The greenhouse gas emission reductions achieved are real, permanent, ensure all of the quantifiable, verifiable, and enforceable by the state board. following: ...The state board (2) For regulations pursuant to Part 5 (commencing with Section 38570), shall re the bes t ty upon available the reduction is in addition to any greenhouse gas emission reduction oth- economic and erwise required by law or regulation, and any other greenhouse gas emis- scientific informa- sion reduction that otherwise would occur. tion... (3) If applicable, the greenhouse gas emission reduction occurs over the board shall con- same time period and is equivalent in amount to any direct emission suit with the reduction required pursuant to this division. Public Utilities Commission in (e) The state board shall rely upon the best available economic and scien- the development tific information and its assessment of existing and projected technologi- of the regula- cal capabilities when adopting the regulations required by this section. tions... 38564 (f) The state board shall consult with the Public Utilities Commission in The state board the development of the regulations as they affect electricity and natural shall consult with gas providers in order to minimize duplicative or inconsistent regulatory other states, and requirements. the federal gov- ernment, and (g)After January 1, 2011, the state board may revise regulations adopted other nations to pursuant to this section and adopt additional regulations to further the identify the most provisions of this division. effective strate- gies and methods to reduce green- 38563. Nothing in this division restricts the state board from adopting house gases... greenhouse gas emission limits or emission reduction measures prior to January 1, 2011, imposing those limits or measures prior to January 1, 38565 2012, or providing early reduction credit where appropriate. The state board shall ensure... 38564. The state board shall consult with other states, and the federal direct public and government, and other nations to identify the most effective strategies private invest- and methods to reduce greenhouse gases, manage greenhouse gas control ment toward the programs, and to facilitate the development of integrated and cost-effec- most disadvan- tive regional, national, and international greenhouse gas reduction pro- taged communi- ties... grams. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 1.11 AB32 California Global Warming Solutions Act 38570(a-c) 38565. The state board shall ensure that the greenhouse gas emission The state board reduction rules, regulations, programs, mechanisms, and incentives under may include...use its jurisdiction, where applicable and to the extent feasible, direct public of market-based and private investment toward the most disadvantaged communities in compliance California and provide an opportunity for small businesses, schools, mechanisms to affordable housing associations, and other community institutions to par- comply with the regulations... ticipate in and benefit from statewide efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Design any mar- ket-based compli- PART 5. MARKET-BASED COMPLIANCE MECHANISMS ance mechanism to prevent any 38570. increase in the (a) The state board may include in the regulations adopted pursuant to emissions... Section 38562 the use of market-based compliance mechanisms to com- ply with the regulations. Maximize addi- tional environ- mental and eco- (b) Prior to the inclusion of any market-based compliance mechanism in nomic benefits for the regulations, to the extent feasible and in furtherance of achieving the California, as statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit, the state board shall do all of appropriate... the following: board shall adopt (I) Consider the potential for direct, indirect, and cumulative emission regulations gov- impacts from these mechanisms, including localized impacts in commu- eming how mar- nities that are already adversely impacted by air pollution. ket-based compli- ance mecha- (2) Design any market-based compliance mechanism to prevent any nisms may be increase in the emissions of toxic air contaminants or criteria air pollu- used... tants. (3) Maximize additional environmental and economic benefits for California, as appropriate. (c) The state board shall adopt regulations governing how market-based compliance mechanisms may be used by regulated entities subject to greenhouse gas emission limits and mandatory emission reporting requirements to achieve compliance with their greenhouse gas emissions limits. 38571. The state board shall adopt methodologies for the quantification of voluntary greenhouse gas emission reductions. The state board shall adopt regulations to verify and enforce any voluntary greenhouse gas emission reductions that are authorized by the state board for use to com- ply with greenhouse gas emission limits established by the state board. 1.12 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Global Warming Solutions Act AB32 The adoption of methodologies is exempt from the rulemaking provisions 38574 of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Nothing in this Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government part...confers any Code). authority on the state board to 38574. Nothing in this part or Part 4 (commencing with Section 38560) alter any pro- confers any authority on the state board to alter any programs adminis- grams adminis- tered by other tered by other state agencies for the reduction of greenhouse gas emis- state agencies for sions. the reduction of greenhouse gas PART 6. ENFORCEMENT emissions... 38580. 38580 (a) The state board shall monitor compliance with and enforce any rule, The state board regulation, order, emission limitation, emissions reduction measure, or may develop a market-based compliance mechanism adopted by the state board pursuant method to con- vert a violation of to this division. any rule, regula- tion, order, emis- (b) Sion limitation, or (1) Any violation of any rule, regulation, order, emission limitation, emis- other emissions sions reduction measure, or other measure adopted by the state board pur- reduction meas- suant to this division may be enjoined pursuant to Section 41513, and the ure adopted by violation is subject to those penalties set forth in Article 3 (commencing the state board... with Section 42400) of Chapter 4 of Part 4 of, and Chapter 1.5 into the number (commencing with Section 43025) of Part 5 of, Division 26. of days in viola- tion... (2) Any violation of any rule, regulation, order, emission limitation, emis- sions reduction measure, or other measure adopted by the state board pur- suant to this division shall be deemed to result in an emission of an air contaminant for the purposes of the penalty provisions of Article 3 (com- mencing with Section 42400) of Chapter 4 of Part 4 of, and Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 43025) of Part 5 of, Division 26. (3) The state board may develop a method to convert a violation of any rule, regulation, order, emission limitation, or other emissions reduction measure adopted by the state board pursuant to this division into the number of days in violation, where appropriate, for the purposes of the penalty provisions of Article 3 (commencing with Section 42400) of Chapter 4 of Part 4 of, and Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 43025) of Part 5 of, Division 26. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 1.13 AB32 California Global Warming Solutions Act 38590 (c) Section 42407 and subdivision (i) of Section 42410 shall not apply to ...the state board this part. shall implement alternative regu- PART 7. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS lations to control mobile sources of 38590. If the regulations adopted pursuant to Section 43018.5 do not greenhouse gas emissions... remain in effect, the state board shall implement alternative regulations to control mobile sources of greenhouse gas emissions to achieve equivalent. 38591(a-c) or greater reductions. The state board... shall convene an 38591. environmental (a) The state board, by July 1, 2007, shall convene an environmental jus- justice advisory tice advisory committee, of at least three members, to advise it in devel- committee... oping the scoping plan pursuant to Section 38561 and any other pertinent ... comprised of matter in implementing this division. The advisory committee shall be representatives comprised of representatives from communities in the state with the most from communities significant exposure to air pollution, including, but not limited to, com- in the state with the most signifi- munities with minority populations or low-income populations, or both. cant exposure to air pollution... (b) The state board shall appoint the advisory committee members from ...The state.board nominations received from environmental justice organizations and com- shall appoint the munity groups. advisory commit- tee members (c) The state board shall provide reasonable per diem for attendance at from nominations advisory committee meetings by advisory committee members from non- received from profit organizations. environmental justice organize- (d) The state board shall appoint an Economic and Technology tions and com- munity groups... Advancement Advisory Committee to advise the state board on activities that will facilitate investment in and implementation of technological The state board research and development opportunities, including, but not limited to, shall appoint an identifying new technologies, research, demonstration projects, funding Economic and opportunities, developing state, national, and international partnerships Technology and technology transfer opportunities, and identifying and assessing Advancement research and advanced technology investment and incentive opportunities Advisory that will assist in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The com- Committee...deve mittee may also advise the state board on state, regional, national, and loping state, international economic and technological developments related to green- national, and international part- house gas emission reductions. nerships and technology trans- fer opportunities. 1.14 _UN. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Global Warming Solutions Act AB32 38592. 38591(d) (a) All state agencies shall consider and implement strategies to reduce ...The state board their greenhouse gas emissions. shall appoint an Economic and (b) Nothing in this division shall relieve any person, entity, or public Technology agency of compliance with other applicable federal, state, or local laws or Advancement regulations, including state air and water quality requirements, and other Advisory requirements for protecting public health or the environment. Committee... developing state, 38593. national, and (a) Nothing in this division affects the authority of the Public Utilities international part- Commission. nerships and technology trans- (b) Nothing in this division affects the obligation of an electrical corpora- fer opportuni- tion to provide customers with safe and reliable electric service. ties... 38594. Nothing in this division shall limit or expand the existing authori- The committee ty of any district, as defined in Section 39025. may also advise the state board on state, regional, 38595. Nothing in this division shall preclude, prohibit, or restrict the national, and construction of any new facility or the expansion of an existing facility international eco- subject to regulation under this division, if all applicable requirements are nomic and tech- met and the facility is in compliance with regulations adopted pursuant to nological devel- this division. opments related to greenhouse 38596. The provisions of this division are severable. If any provision of gas emission this division or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not reductions. affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application. 38593(a) Nothing in this division affects 38597. The state board may adopt by regulation, after a public workshop, the authority of a schedule of fees to be paid by the sources of greenhouse gas emissions the Public Utilities regulated pursuant to this division, consistent with Section 57001. The Commission. revenues collected pursuant to this section, shall be deposited into the Air Pollution Control Fund and are available upon appropriation, by the 38597 Legislature, for purposes of carrying out this division. The state board may adopt... after 38598. a public work- (a) Nothing in this division shall limit the existing authority of a state shop, a schedule entity to adopt and implement greenhouse gas emissions reduction mess- of fees to be paid by the sources of ures. greenhouse gas emissions... U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 1.15 AB32 California Global Warming Solutions Act 38597 (b) Nothing in this division shall relieve any state entity of its legal obli- The state board gations to comply with existing law or regulation. may adopt by regulation, after a 38599. (a) In the event of extraordinary circumstances, catastrophic public workshop, events, or threat of significant economic harm, the Governor may adjust a schedule of the applicable deadlines for individual regulations, or for the state in the fees to be paid by the sources of aggregate, to the earliest feasible date after that deadline. greenhouse gas emissions regu- (b) The adjustment period may not exceed one year unless the Governor fated pursuant to makes an additional adjustment pursuant to subdivision (a). this division... (c) Nothing in this section affects the powers and duties established in the The revenues California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with collected pur- Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code). suant to this sec- tion. shall be (d) The Governor shall, within 10 days of invoking subdivision (a), pro- deposited into the vide written notification to the Legislature of the action undertaken. Air Pollution Control Fund... SEC. 2 No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of 38599(a-c) Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that In the event of may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred extraordinary cir- because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or cumstances, cat- infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the astrophic events, meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the defi- or threat of signif- nition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the icant economic California Constitution. harm, the Governor may adjust the appli- cable deadlines for individual reg- ulations...may not extend on year... Nothing in this section affects the powers and duties estab- lished in the California Emergency Services Act... 1.16 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Protection Act SB375 California Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB375) "...in 1990 greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and light trucks were 108 million metric tons, but by 2004 these emissions had increased to 135 million metric tons...it will be necessary to achieve significant additional greenhouse gas reductions from changed land use patterns and improved transportation. Without improved land use and transportation policy, California will not be able to achieve the goals of AB32. - Section 1(b)(c). U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California,2.1 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act he following is a complete bill, with the exception of the legisla- tive councils digest, which was removed because of redundancy, and to present only the true text of the bill. Sidebars include high- lights from the original document. Section 1(c-e) Senate Bill No. 375 ...it will be neces- sary to achieve CHAPTER 728 significant addi- An act to amend Sections 65080, 65400, 65583, 65584.01, 65584.02, tional greenhouse 65584.04, 65587, and 65588 of, and to add Sections 14522.1, 14522.2, gas reductions and from changed 65080.01 to, the Government Code, and to amend Section 21061.3 of, land use patterns to and improved add Section 21159.28 to, and to add Chapter 4.2 (commencing with transportation. Section 21155) to Division 13 of, the Public Resources Code, relating to ...Changes in environmental quality. land use and transportation ]Approved by Governor September 30, 2008. Filed with policy, based Secretary of State September 30, 2008.] upon established modeling methodology, will The people of the State of California do enact as follows: provide signifi- cant assistance SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following: to California's goals to imple- (a) The transportation sector contributes over 40 percent of the green- ment the federal house gas emissions in the State of California; automobiles and light and state Clean trucks alone contribute almost 30 percent. The transportation sector is the Air Acts and to single largest contributor of greenhouse gases of any sector. reduce its dependence on petroleum. (b) In 2006, the Legislature passed and the Governor signed Assembly Bill 32 (Chapter 488 of the Statutes of 2006; hereafter AB 32), which • ...Current federal requires the State of California to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to law requires 1990 levels no later than 2020. According to the State Air Resources regional trans- Board, in 1990 greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and light portation planning trucks were 108 million metric tons, but by 2004 these emissions had agencies increased to 135 million metric tons. to include a land use allocation in (c) Greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and light trucks can be the regional substantially reduced by new vehicle technology and by the increased use transportation plan. of low carbon fuel. However, even taking these measures into account, it will be necessary to achieve significant additional greenhouse gas reduc- tions from changed land use patterns and improved transportation. Without improved land use and transportation policy, California will not 2.2 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 be able to achieve the goals of AB 32. Section 1 ...The California (d) In addition, automobiles and light trucks account for 50 percent of Environmental air pollution in California and 70 percent of its consumption of petrole- Quality Act um. Changes in land use and transportation policy, based upon estab- (CEQA) is lished modeling methodology, will provide significant assistance to California's California's goals to implement the federal and state Clean Air Acts and premier environ- mental statute... to reduce its dependence on petroleum. ...make land use (e) Current federal law requires regional transportation planning agencies decisions that will to include a land use allocation in the regional transportation plan. Some help the state regions have engaged in a regional "blueprint" process to prepare the achieve its cli- land use allocation. This process has been open and transparent. The mate goals under Legislature intends, by this act, to build upon that successful process by AB 32, assist in requiring metropolitan planning organizations to develop and incorporate the achievement a sustainable communities strategy which will be the land use allocation of state and fed- in the regional transportation plan. eral air quality standards, and (f) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is California's urn cons rvati n. urn conservation. premier environmental statute. New provisions of CEQA should be enact- ed so that the statute encourages developers to submit applications and ...The California local governments to make land use decisions that will help the state Transportation achieve its climate goals under AB 32, assist in the achievement of state Commission has and federal air quality standards, and increase petroleum conservation. developed guide- lines for travel (g) Current planning models and analytical techniques used for making demand models transportation infrastructure decisions and for air quality planning should used in the devel- be able to assess the effects of policy choices, such as residential opment of region- development patterns, expanded transit service and accessibility, the al transportation plans. walkability of communities, and the use of economic incentives and disincentives. (h) The California Transportation Commission has developed guidelines for travel demand models used in the development of regional transporta- tion plans. This act assures the commission's continued oversight of the guidelines, as the commission may update them as needed from time to time. (i) California local governments need a sustainable source of funding to be able to accommodate patterns of growth consistent with the state's climate, air quality, and energy conservation goals. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.3 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SEC. 2. Section 14522.1 is added to the Government Code, to read: 14522.1. Section 2 (1-5) ...The relationship (a) between land use (1) The commission, in consultation with the department density and and the State Air Resources Board, shall maintain guidelines for travel household vehi- demand models used in the development of regional transportation plans cle ownership by federally designated metropolitan planning organizations. and vehicle miles traveled in a way (2) Any revision of the guidelines shall include the formation of an that is consistent with statistical advisory committee that shall include representatives of the metropolitan research. planning organizations, the department, organizations knowledgeable in the creation and use of travel demand models, local governments, and ...The impact of organizations concerned with the impacts of transportation investments enhanced transit on communities and the environment. Before amending the guidelines, service levels on the commission shall hold two workshops on the guidelines, one in north- household vehi- ern California and one in southern California. The workshops shall be cle ownership incorporated into regular commission meetings. and vehicle miles traveled. (b) The guidelines shall, at a minimum and to the extent practicable, Changes in taking into account such factors as the size and available resources of the travel and land metropolitan planning organization, account for all of the following: development like- ly to result from (1) The relationship between land use density and household vehicle highway or pas- ownership and vehicle miles traveled in a way that is consistent with senger rail statistical research. expansion. (2) The impact of enhanced transit service levels on household vehicle ...Speed and fre- ownership and vehicle miles traveled. quency, days, and hours of (3) Changes in travel and land development likely to result from highway operation of tran- or passenger rail expansion. sit service. (4) Mode splitting that allocates trips between automobile, transit, car- pool, and bicycle and pedestrian trips. If a travel demand model is unable to forecast bicycle and pedestrian trips, another means may be used to estimate those trips. (5) Speed and frequency, days, and hours of operation of transit service. 2.4 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 SEC. 3. Section 14522.2 is added to the Government Code, to read: Section 4(a) Each transporta- 14522.2. tion planning agency... shall (a) A metropolitan planning organization shall disseminate prepare and the methodology, results, and key assumptions of whichever travel adopt a regional demand models it uses in a way that would be useable and understand- transportation able to the public. plan... ...directed at (b) Transportation planning agencies other than those identified in regional trans- paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 14522.1, cities, and counties portation system, are encouraged, but not required, to utilize travel demand models that are including, but not consistent with the guidelines in the development of their regional limited to, mass transportation plans. transportation. highway, railroad, SEC. 4. Section 65080 of the Government Code is amended to read: maritime, bicycle, pedestrian, 65080. goods move- ment, and avia- tion facilities and (a) Each transportation planning agency designated under Section services. 29532 or 29532.1 shall prepare and adopt a regional transportation plan directed at achieving a coordinated and balanced regional transportation ...planning system, including, but not limited to, mass transportation, highway, rail- agency shall con- road, maritime, bicycle, pedestrian, goods movement, and aviation facili- Sider and incor- tics and services. The plan shall be action-oriented and pragmatic, consid- porate, as appro- ering both the short-term and long-term future, and shall present clear, priate, the trans- concise policy guidance to local and state officials. The regional trans- portation plans of portation plan shal consider factors specified in Section 134 of Title 23 of cities, counties, districts, private the United States Code. Each transportation planning agency shall con- and incorporate, as appropriate, the transportation plans of cities, organizations, and state and counties, districts, private organizations, and state and federal agencies. federal agencies. • (b) The regional transportation plan shall be an internally consistent document and shall include all of the following: • (1)A policy element that describes the transportation issues in the region, identifies and quantifies regional needs, and describes the desired short- range and long-range transportation goals, and pragmatic objective and policy statements. The objective and policy statements shall be consistent with the funding estimates of the financial element. The policy element of transportation planning agencies with populations that exceed 200,000 persons may quantify a set of indicators including, but not limited to, all U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.5 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act Section 4(A-E) of the following: ...Measures of mobility and traf- (A) Measures of mobility and traffic congestion, including, but not limit- fic congestion, ed to, daily vehicle hours of delay per capita and vehicle miles traveled including, but not per capita. limited to, daily vehicle hours of (B) Measures of road and bridge maintenance and rehabilitation needs, delay per capita and vehicle miles including, but not limited to, roadway pavement and bridge conditions. traveled per capi- ta...Measures of (C) Measures of means of travel, including, but not limited to, percentage means of travel, share of all trips (work and nonwork) made by all of the following: including, but not limited to, per- (i) Single occupant vehicle. centage share of (ii) Multiple occupant vehicle or carpool. all trips (work and (iii) Public transit including commuter rail and intercity rail. nonwork) made (iv) Walking. by all of the fol- (v) Bicycling. lowing: (i) Single occu- (D) Measures of safety and security, including, but not limited to, total pant vehicle. injuries and fatalities assigned to each of the modes set forth in subpara- (ii) Multiple occu- graph (C). pant vehicle or carpool. (E) Measures of equity and accessibility, including, but not limited to, (iii) Public transit percentage of the population served by frequent and reliable public tran- including corn- sit, with a breakdown by income bracket, and percentage of all jobs muter rail and accessible by frequent and reliable public transit service, with a break- intercity rail. down by income bracket. (iv) Walking. (v) Bicycling. (F) The requirements of this section may be met utilizing existing sources breakdown by of information. No additional traffic counts, household surveys, or other income bracket, sources of data shall be required. and percentage of all jobs acces- (2)A sustainable communities strategy prepared by each metropolitan sible by frequent planning organization as follows: and reliable pub- lic transit service, (A) No later than September 30, 2010, the State Air Resources Board with a breakdown shall provide each affected region with greenhouse gas emission reduc- by income brack- tion targets for the automobile and light truck sector for 2020 and 2035, et. respectively. (i) No later than January 31, 2009, the state board shall appoint a Regional Targets Advisory Committee to recommend factors to be con- sidered and methodologies to be used for setting greenhouse gas emission 2.6 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 reduction targets for the affected regions. The committee shall be corn- Section 4(2) posed of representatives of the metropolitan planning organizations, ...A sustainable affected air districts, the League of California Cities, the California State communities Association of Counties, local transportation agencies, and members of strategy prepared the public, including homebuilders, environmental organizations, plan- by each metro- ning organizations, environmental justice organizations, affordable hous- politan ing organizations, and others. The advisory committee shall transmit a planning organi- report with its recommendations to the state board no later than nation... September 30, 2009. In recommending factors to be considered and ...the State Air methodologies to be used, the advisory committee may consider any rele- Resources Board vant issues, including, but not limited to, data needs, modeling tech- shall provide niques, growth forecasts, the impacts of regional jobs-housing balance on each affected interregional travel and greenhouse gas emissions, economic and demo- region with graphic trends, the magnitude of greenhouse gas reduction benefits from greenhouse gas a variety of land use and transportation strategies, and appropriate meth- emission reduc- ods to describe regional targets and to monitor performance in attaining tion targets for those targets. The state board shall consider the report prior to setting the the automobile and light truck targets. sector for 2020 and 2035, (ii) Prior to setting the targets for a region, the state board shall exchange respectively technical information with the metropolitan planning organization and the affected air district. The metropolitan planning organization may recom- mend a target for the region. The metropolitan planning organization shall hold at least one public workshop within the region after receipt of the report from the advisory committee. The state board shall release draft targets for each region no later than June 30, 2010. (iii) In establishing these targets, the state board shall take into account greenhouse gas emission reductions that will be achieved by improved vehicle emission standards, changes in fuel composition, and other meas- ures it has approved that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the affected regions, and prospective measures the state board plans to adopt to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from other greenhouse gas emission sources as that term is defined in subdivision (i) of Section 38505 of the Health and Safety Code and consistent with the regulations promulgated pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Division 12.5 (commencing with Section 38500) of the Health and Safety Code). (iv) The state board shall update the regional greenhouse gas emission reduction targets every eight years consistent with each metropolitan planning organization's timeframe for updating its regional transportation plan under federal law until 2050. The state board may revise the targets U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.7 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act Section 40-11) every four years based on changes in the factors considered under clause • The metropolitan (iii) above. The state board shall exchange technical information with the planning organi- Department of Transportation, metropolitan planning organizations, local zation shall hold governments, and affected air districts and engage in a consultative at least one pub- process with public and private stakeholders prior to updating these tar- 1w workshop with- in the region) gets. ...the state board (v) The greenhouse gas emission reduction targets may be expressed in shall appoint a gross tons, tons per capita, tons per household, or in any other metric • Regional Targets deemed appropriate by the state board. Advisory Committee corn- (B) Each metropolitan planning organization shall prepare a sustainable posed of of the communities strategy, subject to the requirements of Part 450 of Title 23 metropolitan of, and Part 93 of Title 40 of, the Code of Federal Regulations, including planning organi- the requirement to utilize the most recent planning assumptions consider- zations... ing local general plans and other factors. The sustainable communities the League of strategy shall (i) identify the general location of uses, residential densi- Califomia Cities. ties, and building intensities within the region; (ii) identify areas within the California the region sufficient to house all the population of the region, including State Association all economic segments of the population, over the course of the planning of Counties, local period of theregional transportation plan taking into account net migra- transportation tion into the region, population growth, household formation and employ- agencies, and ment growth; members of the public, including (iii) identify areas within the region sufficient to house an eight-year pro- homebuilders, jection of the regional housing need for the region pursuant to Section environmental organizations. 65584; planning organi- zations, environ- mental justice (iv) identify a transportation network to service the transportation needs organizations. of the region; (v) gather and consider the best practically available scien- affordable hous- tific information regarding resource areas and farmland in the region as ing organizations, defined in subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 65080.01; (vi) consider the and others... state housing goals specified in Sections 65580 and 65581; (vii) set forth a forecasted development pattern for the region, which, when integrated ...The metropoli- with the transportation network, and other transportation measures and tan planning policies, will reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and organization shall light trucks to achieve, if there is a feasible way to do so, the greenhouse hold at least one public workshop gas emission reduction targets approved by the state board; and (viii) within the allow the regionaltransportation plan to comply with Section 176 of the region... federal Clean Air Act. (42 U.S.C. Sec. 7506). Within the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, as defined by Section 66502, the Association of Bay Area Governments shall be responsible for 2.8 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (v), and (vi), the Metropolitan Transportation Section 4(iv-$(ii) Commission shall be responsible for clauses (iv) and (viii); and the ...The state board Association of Bay Area Governments and the Metropolitan transporta- shall update the tion Commission shall jointly be responsible for clause (vii). regional green- house gas emis- (C) In the region served by the multicounty transportation planning sion reduction agency described in Section 130004 of the Public Utilities Code, a targets every eight subregional council of governments and the county transportation years sistent with each commission may work together to propose the sustainable communities metropolitan strategy and an alternative planning strategy, if one is prepared pursuant planning organi- to subparagraph (H), for that subregional area. The metropolitan planning zation's time- organization may adopt a framework for a subregional sustainable frame for updat- communities strategy or a subregional alternative planning strategy to ing its regional address the intraregional land use, transportation, economic, air quality, transportation and climate policy relationships. The metropolitan planning organization plan under feder- shall includethe subregional sustainable communities strategy for that al law until 2050. subregion in the regional sustainable communities strategy to the extent consistent with this section and federal law and approve the subregional identify areas within the region alternative planning strategy, if one is prepared pursuant to subparagraph sufficient to (H), for that subregional area to the extent consistent with this section. house all the create public participation plans pursuant to subparagraph (E), ensure population of the coordination, resolve conflicts, make sure that the overall plan complies region, including with applicable legal requirements, and adopt the plan for the region. all economic seg- ments of the pop- (D) The metropolitan planning organization shall conduct at least two ulation... informational meetings in each county within the region for members of the board of supervisors and city councils on the sustainable communities (viii}...a!!ow the • strategy and alternative planning strategy, if any. The metropolitan plan- regionalfrans- ning organization may conduct only one informational meeting if it is Aortation plan to comply with attended by representatives of the county board of supervisors and city Section 176 of council members representing a majority of the cities representing a the federal Clean majority of the population in the incorporated areas of that county. Notice Air Act. (42 of the meeting shall be sent to the clerk of the board of supervisors and to U.S.C. Sec. each city clerk. The purpose of the meeting shall be to present a draft of 7506) the sustainablecommunities strategy to the members of the board of supervisors and the city council members in that county and to solicit and consider their input and recommendations. (E) Each metropolitan planning organization shall adopt a public participation plan, for development of the sustainable communities strate- gy and an alternative planning strategy, if any, that includes all of the fol- lowing: U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.9 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act Section 4 (E(i) ...In the region (i) Outreach efforts to encourage the active participation of a broad range served by the of stakeholder groups in the planning process, consistent with the multicounty trans- agency's adopted Federal Public Participation Plan, including, but not portation planning limited to, affordable housing advocates, transportation advocates, neigh- agency...a borhood and community groups, environmental advocates, home builder subregional coun- cil of govern- representatives, broad-based business organizations, landowners, com- ments and the mercial property interests, and homeowner associations. county trans- portation commis- (ii) Consultation with congestion management agencies, transportation lion may work agencies, and transportation commissions. together to pro- pose the sustain- (iii) Workshops throughout the region to provide the public with the able communities information and tools necessary to provide a clear understanding of the strategy..The issues and policy choices. At least one workshop shall be held in each metropolitan county in the region. For counties with a population greater than 500,000, planning organi- at least three workshops shall be held. Each workshop, to the extent prac- zation (MPO) shall develop ticable, shall include urban simulation computer modeling to create visual overall guide- representations of the sustainable communities strategy and the alterna- lines...Outreach tiveplanning strategy. efforts to encour- age the active (iv) Preparation and circulation of a draft sustainable communities participation... strategy and an alternative planning strategy, if one is prepared, not less affordable hous- than 55 days before adoption of a final regional transportation plan. ing advocates, transportation (v) At least three public hearings on the draft sustainable communities advocates. neigh- strategy in the regional transportation plan and alternative planning strat- borhood and community egy, if one is prepared. If the metropolitan transportation organization groups, environ- consists of a single county, at least two public hearings shall be held. To mental advo- the maximum extent feasible, the hearings shall be in different parts of cates, home the region to maximize the opportunity for participation by members of builder represen- the public throughout the region. tatives, broad- based business (vi) A process for enabling members of the public to provide a single organizations, request to receive notices, information, and updates. landowners, com- mercial property (F) In preparing a sustainable communities strategy, the metropolitan interests, and planning organization shall consider spheres of influence that have been homeowner asso- ciations. adopted by the local agency formation commissions within its region. (G) Prior to adopting a sustainable communities strategy, the metropoli- tan planning organization shall quantify the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions projected to be achieved by the sustainable communities strate- 2.10 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 gy and set forth the difference, if any, between the amount of that reduc- Section 4 (E) tion and the target for the region established by the state board. (iii)(vi) ...Workshops (H) If the sustainable communities strategy, prepared in compliance with throughout the subparagraph (B) or (C), is unable to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to region to provide achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets established by the the public with state board, the metropolitan planning organization shall prepare an the information and tools neces- alternative planning strategy to the sustainable communities strategy sary to provide a showing how those greenhouse gas emission targets would be achieved clear understand- through alternative development patterns, infrastructure, or additional ing of the transportation measures or policies. The alternative planning strategy issues and policy shall be a separate document from the regional transportation plan, but it choices.... may be adopted concurrently with the regional transportation plan. In ...A process for preparing the alternative planning strategy, the metropolitan planning enabling mem- organization: hers of the public to provide a sin- (i) Shall identify the principal impediments to achieving the targets with- gle request to in the sustainable communities strategy. receive notices, information, and updates. (ii) May include an alternative development pattern for the region pursuant to subparagraphs (B) to (F), inclusive. Section 4 (J) ... Nothing in this (iii) Shall describe how the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets section shall would be achieved by the alternative planning strategy, and why the require a city's or development pattern, measures, and policies in the alternative planning county's land use strategy are the most practicable choices for achievement of the green- policies and regu- house gas emission reduction targets. lations, including its general plan, (iv)An alternative development pattern set forth in the alternative to be consistent with the regional planning strategy shall comply with Part 450 of Title 23 of, and Part 93 transportation of Title 40 of, the Code of Federal Regulations, except to the extent that plan...Nothing in compliance will prevent achievement of the greenhouse gas emission this section reduction targets approved by the state board. shall be inter- preted to limit (v) For purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division the state 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code), an board's authori- alternative planning strategy shall not constitute a land use plan, policy, ty under any or regulation, and the inconsistency of a project with an alternative plan- other provision ning strategy shall not be a consideration in determining whether a proj- of law. ect may have an environmental effect. (I) (i) Prior to starting the public participation process adopted pursuant to subparagraph (E) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080, U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in Califomia_ 2.11 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act the metropolitan planning organization shall submit a description to the state board of the technical methodology it intends to use to estimate the greenhouse gas emissions from its sustainable communities strategy and, if appropriate, its alternative planning strategy. The state board shall respond to the metropolitan planning organization in a timely manner with written comments about the technical methodology, including specifically describing any aspects of that methodology it concludes will not yield accurate estimates of greenhouse gas emissions, and suggested remedies. The metropolitan planning organization is encouraged to work with the state board until the state board concludes that the technical methodology operates accurately. (ii)After adoption, a metropolitan planning organization shall submit a sustainable communities strategy or an alternative planning strategy, if one has been adopted, to the state board for review, including the quan- tification of the greenhouse gas emission reductions the strategy would achieve and a description of the technical methodology used to obtain that result. Review by the state board shall be limited to acceptance or rejection of the metropolitan planning organization's determination that the strategy submitted would, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets established by the state board. The state board shall complete its review within 60 days. (iii) If the state board determines that the strategy submitted would not, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets, the metropolitan planning organization shall revise its strategy or adopt an alternative planning strategy, if not previously adopted, and submit the strategy for review pursuant to clause (ii). At a minimum, the metropoli- tan planning organization must obtain state board acceptance that an alternative planning strategy would, if implemented, achieve the green- house gas emission reduction targets established for that region by the state board. (J) Neither a sustainable communities strategy nor an alternative planning strategy regulates the use of land, nor, except as provided by subpara- graph (I), shall either one be subject to any state approval. Nothing in a sustainable communities strategy shall be interpreted as superseding the exercise of the land use authority of cities and counties within the region. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to limit the state board's authority under any other provision of law. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to authorize the abrogation of any vested right whether cre- ated by statute or by common law. Nothing in this section shall require a city's or county's land use policies and regulations, including its general 2.12 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 plan, to be consistent with the regional transportation plan or an alterna- 38574 tive planning strategy. Nothing in this section requires a metropolitan Nothing in this planning organization to approve a sustainable communities strategy that part...confers any would be inconsistent with Part 450 of Title 23 of, or Part 93 of Title 40 authority on the of, the Code of Federal Regulations and any administrative guidance state board to under those regulations. Nothing in this section relieves a public or pri- alter any pro- vate entity or any person from compliance with any other local, state, or grams adminis- tered by other state agencies for the reduction of (K) Nothing in this section requires projects programmed for funding on greenhouse gas or before December 31, 2011, to be subject to the provisions of this emissions... paragraph if they (i) are contained in the 2007 or 2009 Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, (ii) are funded pursuant to Chapter 38580 12.49 (commencing with Section 8879.20) of Division 1 of Title 2, or The state board (iii) were specifically listed in a ballot measure prior to December 31, may develop a 2008, approving a sales tax increase for transportation projects. Nothing method to con- in this section shall require a transportation sales tax authority to change vert a violation of the funding allocations approved by the voters for categories of trans- any rule, regula- tion, order, emis- portation projects in a sales tax measure adopted prior to December 31, sion limitation, or 2010. For purposes of this subparagraph, a transportation sales tax other emissions authority is a district, as defined in Section 7252 of the Revenue and reduction meas- Taxation Code, that is authorized to impose a sales tax for transportation ure adopted by purposes. the state board... into the number (L)A metropolitan planning organization, or a regional transportation of days in viola- planning agency not within a metropolitan planning organization, that is tion... required to adopt a regional transportation plan not less than every five years, may elect to adopt the plan not less than every four years. This election shall be made by the board of directors of the metropolitan plan- ningorganization or regional transportation planning agency no later than Junel, 2009, or thereafter 54 months prior to the statutory deadline for theadoption of housing elements for the local jurisdictions within the region, after a public hearing at which comments are accepted from members of the public and representatives of cities and counties within the region covered by the metropolitan planning organization or regional transportation planning agency. Notice of the public hearing shall be given to the general public and by mail to cities and counties within the region no later than 30 days prior to the date of the public hearing. Notice of election shall be promptly given to the Department of Housing and Community Development. The metropolitan planning organization or the regional transportation planning agency shall complete its next regional transportation plan within three years of the notice of election. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.13 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act Section 4 (M) ... The participat- (M) Two or more of the metropolitan planning organizations for Fresno ing metropolitan County, Kern County, Kings County, Madera County, Merced County, planning organ- San Joaquin County, Stanislaus County, and Tulare County may work zations may also together to develop and adopt multiregional goals and policies that may develop i- address interregional land use, transportation, economic, air quality, and sustain- able sustain- able communities climate relationships. The participating metropolitan planning organiza- strategy to the tions may also develop a multiregional sustainable communities strategy, extent consistent to the extent consistent with federal law, or an alternative planning strate- with federal law... gy for adoption by the metropolitan planning organizations. Each partici- pating metropolitan planning organization shall consider any adopted multiregional goals and policies in the development of a sustainable com- munities strategy and, if applicable, an alternative planning strategy for its region. (3)An action element that describes the programs and actions necessary to implement the plan and assigns implementation responsibilities. The action element may describe all transportation projects proposed for development during the 20-year or greater life of the plan. The action ele- ment shall consider congestion management programming activities car- ried out within the region. (4) (A)A financial element that summarizes the cost of plan implementation constrained by a realistic projection of available rev- enues. The financial element shall also contain recommendations for allo- cation of funds. A county transportation commission created pursuant to Section 130000 of the Public Utilities Code shall be responsible for rec- ommending projects to be funded with regional improvement funds, if the project is consistent with the regional transportation plan. The first five years of the financial element shall be based on the five-year esti- mate of funds developed pursuant to Section 14524. The financial cle- ment may recommend the development of specified new sources of rev- enue, consistent with the policy element and action element (B) The financial element of transportation planning agencies with populations that exceed 200,000 persons may include a project cost breakdown for all projects proposed for development during the 20-year life of the plan that includes total expenditures and related percentages of total expenditures for all of the following: (i) State highway expansion. (ii) State highway rehabilitation, maintenance, and operations. (iii) Local road and street expansion. 2.14 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 (iv) Local road and street rehabilitation, maintenance, and operation. Section (4,A,C) (v) Mass transit, commuter rail, and intercity rail expansion. The metropolitan (vi) Mass transit, commuter rail, and intercity rail rehabilitation, planning organl- maintenance, and operations. zation... shall (vii) Pedestrian and bicycle facilities. consider financial (viii) Environmental enhancements and mitigation. incentives for (ix) Research and planning. cities and coun- ties that have (x) Other categories. resource areas or farmland...for the (C) The metropolitan planning organization or county transportation purposes of, for agency, whichever entity is appropriate, shall consider financial incen- example, trans- tives for cities and counties that have resource areas or farmland, as portation invest- defined in Section 65080.01, for the purposes of, for example, transporta- ments for the tion investments for the preservation and safety of the city street or coun- preservation and ty road system and farm to market and interconnectivity transportation safety of the city needs. The metropolitan planning organization or county transportation street or county agency, whichever entity is appropriate, shall also consider financial road system and assistance for counties to address countywide service responsibilities in farm to market counties that contribute towards the greenhouse gas emission reduction and interconnec- tivity transporta- targets by implementing policies for growth to occur within their cities. tion needs. (c) Each transportation planning agency may also include other factors ... issues of of local significance as an element of the regional transportation plan, mobility for spe- including, but not limited to, issues of mobility for specific sectors of the ciric sectors of community, including, but not limited to, senior citizens. the community, including, but not (d) Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, each transportation limited to, senior • planning agency shall adopt and submit, every four years, an updated citizens. regional transportation plan to the California Transportation Commission and the Department of Transportation. A transportation planning agency located in a federally designated air quality attainment area or that does not contain an urbanized area may at its option adopt and submit a regional transportation plan every five years. When applicable, the plan shall be consistent with federal planning and programming requirements and shall conform to the regional transportation plan guidelines adopted by the California Transportation Commission. Prior to adoption of the regional transportation plan, a public hearing shall be held after the giv- ing of notice of the hearing by publication in the affected county or coun- ties pursuant toSection 6061. • U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.15 • SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SEC. 5. Section 65080.01 is added to the Government Code, to read: 65080.01. The following definitions apply to terms used in Section 65080: (a) "Resource areas" include (1) all publicly owned parks and open space; (2) open space or habitat areas protected by natural community conserva- tion plans, habitat conservation plans, and other adopted natural resource protection plans; (3) habitat for species identified as candidate, fully protected, sensitive, or species of special status by local, state, or federal agencies or protected by the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, the California Endangered Species Act, or the Native Plan Protection Act; (4) lands subject to conservation or agricultural easements for conserva- tion or agricultural purposes by local governments, special districts, or • nonprofit 501(c)(3) organizations, areas of the state designated by the State Mining and Geology Board as areas of statewide or regional signifi- cance pursuant to Section 2790 of the Public Resources Code, and lands under Williamson Act contracts; (5) areas designated for open-space or agricultural uses in adopted open- space elements or agricultural elements of the local general plan or by local ordinance; (6) areas containing biological resources as described in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines that may be significantly affected by the sustain- able communities strategy or the alternative planning strategy; and (7) an area subject to flooding where a development project would not, at the time of development in the judgment of the agency, meet the require- ments of the National Flood Insurance Program or where the area is sub- ject to more protective provisions of state law or local ordinance. (b) "Farmland" means farmland that is outside all existing city spheres of influence or city limits as of January 1, 2008, and is one of the follow- ing: (1) Classified as prime or unique farmland or farmland of statewide importance. 2.16 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 (2) Farmland classified by a local agency in its general plan that meets or exceeds the standards for prime or unique farmland or farmland of statewide importance. (c) "Feasible" means capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, legal, social, and technological factors. (d) "Consistent" shall have the same meaning as that term is used in Section 134 of Title 23 of the United States Code. (e) "Internally consistent" means that the contents of the elements of the regional transportation plan must be consistent with each other. SEC. 6. Section 65400 of the Government Code is amended to read: 65400. (a) After the legislative body has adopted all or part of a general plan, the planning agency shall do both of the following: (1) Investigate and make recommendations to the legislative body regarding reasonable and practical means for implementing the general plan or element of the general plan, so that it will serve as an effective guide for orderly growth and development, preservation and conservation of open-space land and natural resources, and the efficient expenditure of public funds relating to the subjects addressed in the general plan. (2) Provide by April 1 of each year an annual report to the legislative body, the Office of Planning and Research, and the Department of Housing and Community Development that includes all of the following: (A) The status of the plan and progress in its implementation. (B) The progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs determined pursuant to Section 65584 and local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and develop- ment of housing pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583. The housing element portion of the annual report, as required by this paragraph, shall be prepared through the use of forms and definitions adopted by the Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2). Prior to and after adoption of the forms, the housing ele- U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.17 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act Section 6 ment portion of the annual report shall include a section that describes .After the leg- the actions taken by the local government towards completion of the pro- 1 islative body has grams and status of the local government's compliance with the deadlines adopted all or in its housing element. That report shall be considered at an annual public part of a general meeting before the legislative body where members of the public shall be plan, the planning agency shall do allowed to provide oral testimony and written comments. both of the follow- ing: (C) The degree to which its approved general plan complies with the guidelines developed and adopted pursuant to Section 65040.2 and the (1)... guide for date of the last revision to the general plan. j orderly growth and development, (b) If a court finds, upon a motion to that effect, that a city, county, or preservation and city and county failed to submit, within 60 days of the deadline estab- conservation of lished in this section, the housing element portion of the report required open-space land pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) that sub- and natural stantially complies with the requirements of this section, the court shall resources, and the efficient issue an order or judgment compelling compliance with this section with- expenditure of in 60 days. If the city, county, or city and county fails to comply with the public funds relat- court's order within 60 days, the plaintiff or petitioner may move for ing to the sub- sanctions, and the court may, upon that motion, grant appropriate sanc- jects addressed tions. The court shall retain jurisdiction to ensure that its order or judg- in the general ment is carried out. If the court determines that its order or judgment is plan.... not carried out within 60 days, the court may issue further orders as pro- vided by law to ensure that the purposes and policies of this section are 65883 fulfilled. This subdivision applies to proceedings initiated on or after the report shall be first day of October following the adoption of forms and definitions by considered at an the Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to annual public • meeting before paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), but no sooner than six months following the legislative that adoption. body where members of the SEC. 7. Section 65583 of the Government Code is amended to read: public shall be allowed to pro- 65583. vide oral testimo- The housing element shall consist of an identification and analysis ny and written of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies comments. quantified objectives, financial resources, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing. The housing element shall identify adequate sites for housing, including rental hous- ing, factory-built housing, mobilehomes, and emergency shelters, and shall make adequate provision for the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community. The element shall contain all of the following: 2.18 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 (a) An assessment of housing needs and an inventory of resources and Section 7 constraints relevant to the meeting of these needs. The assessment and 65583(a)(1) inventory shall include all of the following: ...The housing element shall (1)An analysis of population and employment trends and documentation identify adequate of projections and a quantification of the locality's existing and projected sites for housing, including rental housing needs for all income levels, including extremely low income housing, factory- households, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 50105 and Section built housing, 50106 of the Health and Safety Code. These existing and projected needs mobilehomes, shall include the locality's share of the regional housing need in accor- and emergency dancewith Section 65584. Local agencies shall calculate the subset of shelters, and very low income households allotted under Section 65584 that qualify as shall make ade- extremely low income households. The local agency may either use quate provision available census data to calculate the percentage of very low income for the existing households that qualify as extremely low income households or presume and projected that 50 percent of the very low income households qualify as extremely needs of all eco- low income households. The number of extremely low income house- nomic segments holds and very low income households shall equal the jurisdiction's allo- of the communi- ty.. cation of very low incomehouseholds pursuant to Section 65584. ...An analysis of (2)An analysis and documentation of household characteristics, including population and level of payment compared to ability to pay, housing characteristics, employment including overcrowding, and housing stock condition. trends and docu- mentation of pro- (3) An inventory of land suitable for residential development, including jections and a vacant sites and sites having potential for redevelopment, and an analysis quantification of of the relationship of zoning and public facilities and services to these the locality's sites. existing and pro- jected housing needs for all (4) (A) The identification of a zone or zones where emergency shelters income levels, are allowed as a permitted use without a conditional use or other including discretionary permit. The identified zone or zones shall include sufficient ary p extremely low capacity to accommodate the need for emergency shelter identified in income house- paragraph (7), except that each local government shall identify a zone or holds... zones that can accommodate at least one year-round emergency shelter. If the local government cannot identify a zone or zones with sufficient capacity, the local government shall include a program to amend its zon- ing ordinance to meet the requirements of this paragraph within one year of the adoption of the housing element. The local government may identi- fy additional zones where emergency shelters are permitted with a condi- tional use permit. The local government shall also demonstrate that exist- ing or proposed permit processing, development, and management stan- dards are objective and encourage and facilitate the development of, or U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.19 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act conversion to, emergency shelters. Emergency shelters may only be sub- ject to those development and management standards that apply to resi- dential or commercial development within the same zone except that a local government may apply written, objective standards that include all of the following: (i) The maximum number of beds or persons permitted to be served nightly by the facility. (ii) Off-street parking based upon demonstrated need, provided that the standards do not require more parking for emergency shelters than for other residential or commercial uses within the same zone. (iii) The size and location of exterior and interior onsite waiting and client intake areas. (iv) The provision of onsite management. (v) The proximity to other emergency shelters, provided that emergency shelters are not required to be more than 300 feet apart. (vi) The length of stay. (vii) Lighting. (viii) Security during hours that the emergency shelter is in operation. (B) The permit processing, development, and management standards applied under this paragraph shall not be deemed to be discretionary acts within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code). (C)A local government that can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the department the existence of one or more emergency shelters either within its jurisdiction or pursuant to a multijurisdictional agreement that can accommodate that jurisdiction's need for emergency shelter identified in paragraph (7) may comply with the zoning requirements of subparagraph (A) by identifying a zone or zones where new emergency shelters are allowed with a conditional use permit. (D) A local government with an existing ordinance or ordinances that comply with this paragraph shall not be required to take additional action 2.20 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 to identify zones for emergency shelters. The housing element must only Section 7 describe how existing ordinances, policies, and standards are consistent 65583(5-8) with the requirements of this paragraph. ...An analysis of potential and (5)An analysis of potential and actual governmental constraints upon actual govern- the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income mental con- straints upon the levels, including the types of housing identified in paragraph (1) of maintenance, subdivision (c), and for persons with disabilities as identified in the improvement, or analysis pursuant to paragraph (7), including land use controls, building development of codes and their enforcement, site improvements, fees and other exactions housing for all required of developers, and local processing and permit procedures. The income levels, analysis shall also demonstrate local efforts to remove governmental con- including... per- straints that hinder the locality from meeting its share of the regional sons with disabili- housing need in accordance with Section 65584 and from meeting the ties... including need for housing for persons with disabilities, supportive housing, transi- land use con- tional housing, and emergency shelters identified pursuant to paragraph troll... ...analysis of any (7). Transitional housing and supportive housing shall be considered a special housing residential use of property, and shall be subject only to those restrictions needs, such as that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same those of the eid- zone. erly, persons with disabilities, large (6)An analysis of potential and actual nongovernmental constraints upon families. farm- the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income workers, families levels, including the availability of financing, the price of land, and the with female cost of construction. heads of house- holds, and fami- (7) An analysis of any special housing needs, such as those of the elderly, lies and persons in need of emer- persons with disabilities, large families, farmworkers, families with gency helter.. female heads of households, and families and persons in need of emer- gency shelter. The need for emergency shelter shall be assessed based on ...An analysis of annual and seasonal need. The need for emergency shelter may be opportunities for reduced by the number of supportive housing units that are identified in energy conserve- an adopted 10-year plan to end chronic homelessness and that are either tion with respect vacant or for which funding has been identified to allow construction to residential during the planning period. development. (8)An analysis of opportunities for energy conservation with respect to residential development. (9) An analysis of existing assisted housing developments that are eligi- ble to change from low-income housing uses during the next 10 years due to termination of subsidy contracts, mortgage prepayment, or expira- U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.21 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act Section 7 tion of restrictions on use. "Assisted housing developments," for the pur- 65583(9) pose of this section, shall mean multifamily rental housing that receives ...An analysis of governmental assistance under federal programs listed in subdivision (a) existing assisted of Section 65863.10, state and local multifamily revenue bond programs, housing develop- local redevelopment programs, the federal Community Development merits that are Block Grant Program, or local in-lieu fees. "Assisted housing develop- eligible to change from low-income ments" shall also include multifamily rental units that were developed housing uses pursuant to a local inclusionary housing program or used to qualify for a during the next density bonus pursuant to Section 65916. 10 years due to termination of (A) The analysis shall include a listing of each development by project subsidy con- name and address, the type of governmental assistance received, the ear- tracts, mortgage liest possible date of change from low-income use and the total number prepayment, or of elderly and nonelderly units that could be lost from the locality's low- expiration of income housing stock in each year during the 10-year period. For purpos- restrictions on es of state and federally funded projects, the analysis required by this use. "Assisted subparagraph need only contain information available on a statewide housing develop- ments,"for the basis. purpose of this section, shall (B) The analysis shall estimate the total cost of producing new rental mean multifamily housing that is comparable in size and rent levels, to replace the units that rental housing could change from low-income use, and an estimated cost of preserving that receives the assisted housing developments. This cost analysis for replacement governmental housing may be done aggregately for each five-year period and does not assistance under have to contain a project-by-project cost estimate. federal programs multifamily rev- (C) The analysis shall identify public and private nonprofit corporations enue bond pro- known to the local government which have legal and managerial capacity grams, local to acquire and manage these housing developments. redevelopment programs, the (D) The analysis shall identify and consider the use of all federal, state, federal commu- and local financing and subsidy programs which can be used to preserve, nity Development for lower income households, the assisted housing developments, identi- Block Grant tied in this paragraph, including, but not limited to, federal Community Program. or local Development Block Grant Program funds, tax increment funds received in-lieu fees. by a redevelopment agency of the community, and administrative fees "Assisted housing received by a housing authority operating within the community. In con- developments" sidering the use of these financing and subsidy programs, the analysis shall also include shall identify the amounts of funds under each available program which multifamily rental units... have not been legally obligated for other purposes and which could be available for use in preserving assisted housing developments. 2.22 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 (b) (1) A statement of the community's goals, quantified objectives, and Section 7 policies relative to the maintenance, preservation, improvement, and 65583(9)(C-13) development of housing. ...The analysis shall identify pub- (2) It is recognized that the total housing needs identified pursuant to lic and private subdivision (a) may exceed available resources and the community's abil- nonprofit corpora- tions known to ity to satisfy this need within the content of the general plan requirements the local govern- . outlined in Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300). Under these ment which have circumstances, the quantified objectives need not be identical to the total legal and mana- housing needs. The quantified objectives shall establish the maximum gerial capacity number of housing units by income category, including extremely low to acquire and income, that can be constructed, rehabilitated, and conserved over a five- manage these year time period. housing develop- ments. (c) A program which sets forth a schedule of actions during the planning period, each with a timeline for implementation, which may recognize The analysis that certain programs are ongoing, such that there will be beneficial shall identify and impacts of the programs within the planning period, that the local govern- of asided the use of !I federal, ment is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and state. and local achieve the goals and objectives of the housing element through the financing and administration of land use and development controls, the provision of subsidy programs regulatory concessions and incentives, and the utilization of appropriate which can be federal and state financing and subsidy programs when available and the used to preserve, utilization of moneys in a low- and moderate-income housing fund of an for lower income agency if the locality has established a redevelopment project area pur- households, the suant to the Community Redevelopment Law (Division 24 (commencing assisted housing with Section 33000) of the Health and Safety Code). In order to make developments... adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community, the program shall do all of the following: (1) Identify actions that will be taken to make sites available during the planning period of the general plan with appropriate zoning and develop- ment standards and with services and facilities to accommodate that por- tion of the city's or county's share of the regional housing need for each income level that could not be accommodated on sites identified in the inventory completed pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) without rezoning, and to comply with the requirements of Section 65584.09. Sites shall be identified as needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including multifam- ily rental housing, factory-built housing, mobilehomes, housing for agri- cultural employees, supportive housing, single-room occupancy units, emergency shelters, and transitional housing. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.23 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act (A) Where the inventory of sites, pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision Section 65583.2. (a), does not identify adequate sites to accommodate the need for groups (C) Where the of all household income levels pursuant to Section 65584, rezoning of inventory of sites those sites, including adoption of minimum density and development pursuant to para- standards, for jurisdictions with an eight-year housing element planning graph (3) of sub- period pursuant to Section 65588, shall be completed no later than three division (a) does not identify ade- years after either the date the housing element is adopted pursuant to sub- quate sites to division (f) of Section 65585 or the date that is 90 days after receipt of accommodate the comments from the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section need for farm- 65585, whichever is earlier, unless the deadline is extended pursuant to worker housing, subdivision (f). Notwithstanding the foregoing, for a local government the program shall that fails to adopt a housing element within 120 days of the statutory provide for suffi- deadline in Section 65588 for adoption of the housing element, rezoning cient sites to of those sites, including adoption of minimum density and development meet the need standards, shall be completed no later than three years and 120 days from with zoning that the statutory deadline in Section 65588 for adoption of the housing ele- permits farm- worker housing merit. use by right; including density (B) Where the inventory of sites, pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision and development (a), does not identify adequate sites to accommodate the need for groups standards that of all household income levels pursuant to Section 65584, the program could accommo- shall identify sites that can be developed for housing within the planning date and facilitate period pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 65583.2. The identification the feasibility of of sites shall include all components specified in subdivision (b) of the development of farmworker Section 65583.2. housing for low- and very (C) Where the inventory of sites pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision income house- holds... (a) does not identify adequate sites to accommodate the need for farm- worker housing, the program shall provide for sufficient sites to meet the need with zoning that permits farmworker housing use by right, including density and development standards that could accommodate and facilitate the feasibility of the development of farmworker housing for low- and very low income households. (2)Assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low, very low, low-, and moderate-income households. (3)Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and develop- ment of housing, including housing for all income levels and housing for persons with disabilities. The program shall remove constraints to, and i provide reasonable accommodations for housing designed for, intended 2.24 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 for occupancy by, or with supportive services for, persons with disabili- Section ties. 65583.2.(6-7) Preserve for (4) Conserve and improve the condition of the existing affordable hous- lower income ing stock, which may include addressing ways to mitigate the loss of households the dwelling units demolished by public or private action. assisted housing developments... (5) Promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, ...all available religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial sta- federal, state, tus, or disability. and local financ- ing and subsidy (6) identified pursuant to paragraph (9) of subdivision (a). The programs... program for preservation of the assisted housing developments shall uti- lize, to the extent necessary, all available federal, state, and local financ- ...The local gov- ing and subsidy programs identified in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a), ernment shall except where a community has other urgent needs for which alternative make a diligent funding sources are not available. The program may include strategies effort to achieve public participa- that involve local regulation and technical assistance. tion of all eco- nomic segments (7) The program shall include an identification of the agencies and of the community officials responsible for the implementation of the various actions and the in the develop- means by which consistency will be achieved with other general plan ment of the hous- elements and community goals. The local government shall make a dili- ing element, and gent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the the program community in the development of the housing element, and the program shall describe shall describe this effort. this effort. (d) (I)A local government may satisfy all or part of its requirement to identify a zone or zones suitable for the development of emergency shel- ters pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) by adopting and imple- menting a multijurisdictional agreement, with a maximum of two other adjacent communities, that requires the participating jurisdictions to develop at least one year-round emergency shelter within two years of the beginning of the planning period. (2) The agreement shall allocate a portion of the new shelter capacity to each jurisdiction as credit towards its emergency shelter need, and each jurisdiction shall describe how the capacity was allocated as part of its housing element. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.25 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act Section (3) Each member jurisdiction of a multijurisdictional agreement shall 65583.2.(g,2) describe in its housing element all of the following: ...a local govern- ment may not (A) How the joint facility will meet the jurisdiction's emergency shelter disapprove a need. housing develop- ment project. nor require a condi- (B) The jurisdiction's contribution to the facility for both the develop- tional use permit. ment and ongoing operation and management of the facility. planned unit development per- (C) The amount and source of the funding that the jurisdiction contributes mit, or other to the facility. locally imposed discretionary per- (4) The aggregate capacity claimed by the participating jurisdictions in mit, or impose a their housing elements shall not exceed the actual capacity of the shelter. condition that would render the (e) Except as otherwise provided in this article, amendments to this arti- project inieasi- clethat alter the required content of a housing element shall apply to both ble... of the following: (I)A housing element or housing element amendment prepared pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 65588 or Section 65584.02, when a city, county, or city and county submits a draft to the department for review pursuant to Section 65585 more than 90 days after the effective date of the amendment to this section. (2) Any housing element or housing element amendment prepared pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 65588 or Section 65584.02, when the city, county, or city and county fails to submit the first draft to the department before the due date specified in Section 65588 or 65584.02. (f) The deadline for completing required rezoning pursuant to subpara- graph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) shall be extended by one year if the local government has completed the rezoning at densities sufficient to accommodate at least 75 percent of the sites for low- and very low income households and if the legislative body at the conclusion of a public hearing determines, based upon substantial evidence, that any of the following circumstances exist: (1) The local government has been unable to complete the rezoning because of the action or inaction beyond the control of the local govern- ment of any other state federal or local agency. (2) The local government is unable to complete the rezoning because of infrastructure deficiencies due to fiscal or regulatory constraints. 2.26 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California • California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 (3) The local government must undertake a major revision to its general plan in order to accommodate the housing related policies of a sustain- able communities strategy or an alternative planning strategy adopted pursuant to Section 65080. The resolution and the findings shall be trans- mitted to the department together with a detailed budget and schedule for preparation and adoption of the required rezonings, including plans for citizen participation and expected interim action. The schedule shall pro- vide for adoption of the required rezoning within one year of the adop- tion of the resolution. (g) (1) If a local government fails to complete the rezoning by the deadline provided in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c), as it may be extended pursuant to subdivision (f), except as provided in paragraph (2), a local government may not disapprove a housing development project, nor require a conditional use permit, planned unit development permit, or other locally imposed discretionary permit, or impose a condition that would render the project infeasible, if the housing development project (A) is proposed to be located on a site required to be rezoned pursuant to the program action required by that subparagraph; and (B) complies with applicable, objective general plan and zoning stan- dards and criteria, including design review standards, described in the program action required by that subparagraph. Any subdivision of sites shall be subject to the Subdivision Map Act. Design review shall not con- stitute a "project" for purposes of Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code. (2)A local government may disapprove a housing development described in paragraph (1) if it makes written findings supported by substantial evidence on the record that both of the following conditions exist: (A) The housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety unless the project is disapproved or approved upon the condition that the project be developed at a lower density. As used in this paragraph, a "specific, adverse impact" means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objec- tive, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or con- ditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete. (B) There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact identified pursuant to paragraph (1), other than the disapproval of the housing development project or the approval of the project upon the condition that it be developed at a lower density. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.27 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act (3) The applicant or any interested person may bring an action to enforce this subdivision. If a court finds that the local agency disapproved a proj- ect or conditioned its approval in violation of this subdivision, the court � shall issue an order or judgment compelling compliance within 60 days. The court shall retain jurisdiction to ensure that its order or judgment is carried out. If the court determines that its order or judgment has not been carried out within 60 days, the court may issue further orders to ensure that the purposes and policies of this subdivision are fulfilled. In any such action, the city, county, or city and county shall bear the burden of proof. (4) For purposes of this subdivision, "housing development project" means a project to construct residential units for which the project devel- oper provides sufficient legal commitments to the appropriate local agency to ensure the continued availability and use of at least 49 percent of the housing units for very low, low -, and moderate-income house- holds with an affordablehousing cost or affordable rent, as defined in Section 50052.5 or 50053 of the Health and Safety Code, respectively, for the period required by the applicable financing. (h)An action to enforce the program actions of the housing element shall be brought pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure. SEC. 8. Section 65584.01 of the Government Code is amended to read: 65584.01. (a) For the fourth and subsequent revision of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department, in consultation with each council of governments, where applicable, shall determine the exist- ing and projected need for housing for each region in the following man- ner: (b) The department's determination shall be based upon population projections produced by the Department of Finance and regional popula- tion forecasts used in preparing regional transportation plans, in consulta- tion with each council of governments. If the total regional population forecast for the planning period, developed by the council of govern- ments and used for the preparation of the regional transportation plan, is within a range of 3 percent of the total regional population forecast for the planning period over the same time period by the Department of Finance, then the population forecast developed by the council of govern- ments shall be the basis fromwhich the department determines the exist- ing and projected need for housing in the region. If the difference between the total population growth projected by the council of govern- ments and the total population growth projected for the region by the Department of Finance is greater than 3 percent, then the depaiLnent and 2.28 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 the council of governments shall meet to discuss variances in methodolo- gy used for population projections and seek agreement on a population projection for the region to be used as a basis for determining the existing and projected housing need for the region. If no agreement is reached, then the population projection for the region shall be the population projection for the region prepared by the Department of Finance as may be modified by the department as a result of discussions with the council of governments. (c) (1)At least 26 months prior to the scheduled revision pursuant to Section 65588 and prior to developing the existing and projected housing need for a region, the department shall meet and consult with the council of governments regarding the assumptions and methodology to be used by the department to determine the region's housing needs. The council of governments shall provide data assumptions from the council's projec- tions, including, if available, the following data for the region: (A) Anticipated household growth associated with projected population increases. (B) Household size data and trends in household size. (C) The rate of household formation, or headship rates, based on age, gender, ethnicity, or other established demographic measures. (D) The vacancy rates in existing housing stock, and the vacancy rates for healthy housing market functioning and regional mobility, as well as housing replacement needs. (E) Other characteristics of the composition of the projected population. 1 (F) The relationship between jobs and housing, including any imbalance between jobs and housing. (2) The department may accept or reject the information provided by the council of governments or modify its own assumptions or methodology based on this information. After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make determinations in writing on the assumptions for each of the factors listed in subparagraphs (A) to (F), inclusive, of paragraph (1) and the methodology it shall use and shall provide these determinations to the council of governments. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.29 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act Section 65583.2. (d) (1)After consultation with the council of governments, the (d,1:c) department shall make a determination of the region's existing and pro- ...The region's jected housing need based upon the assumptions and methodology deter- existing and pro- mined pursuant to subdivision (c). The region's existing and projected jected housing housing need shall reflect the achievement of a feasible balance between need shall reflect the achievement jobs and housing within the region using the regional employment pro- of a feasible bal- jections in the applicable regional transportation plan. Within 30 days fol- ance between lowing notice of the determination from the department, the council of jobs and housing governments may file an objection to the department's determination of f within the region the region's existing and projected housing need with the depai talent. using the regional employment pro- (2) The objection shall be based on and substantiate either of the jections in the following: applicable region- al transportation (A) The depaituient failed to base its determination on the population plan... projection for the region established pursuant to subdivision (b), and shall identify the population projection which the council of governments believes should instead be used for the determination and explain the basis for its rationale. (B) The regional housing need determined by the department is not a reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (c). The objection shall include a proposed alter- native determination of its regional housing need based upon the determi- nations made in subdivision (c), including analysis of why the proposed alternative would be a more reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (c). (3) If a council of governments files an objection pursuant to this subdivision and includes with the objection a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need, it shall also include documentation of its basis for the alternative determination. Within 45 days of receiving an objection filed pursuant to this section, the depart- ment shall consider the objection and make a final written determination of the region's existing and projected housing need that includes an explanation of the information upon which the determination was made. • 2.30 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 SEC. 9. Section 65584.02 of the Government Code is amended to read: 65584.02. (a) For the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the existing and projected need for housing may be determined for each region by the department as follows, as an alternative to the process pursuant to Section 65584.01: (I) In a region in which at least one subregion has accepted delegated authority pursuant to Section 65584.03, the region's housing need shall be determined at least 26 months prior to the housing element update deadline pursuant to Section 65588. In a region in which no subregion has accepted delegation pursuant to Section 65584.03, the region's hous- ing need shall be determined at least 24 months prior to the housing ele- ment deadline. (2) At least six months prior to the department's determination of region- al housing need pursuant to paragraph (I), a council of governments may request the use of population and household forecast assumptions used in the regional transportation plan. This request shall include all of the following: (A) Proposed data and assumptions for factors contributing to housing need beyond household growth identified in the forecast. These factors shall include allowance for vacant or replacement units, and may include other adjustment factors. (B) A proposed planning period that is not longer than the period of time covered by the regional transportation improvement plan or plans of the region pursuant to Section 14527, but a period not less than five years, and not longer than six years. (C)A comparison between the population and household assumptions used for the Regional Transportation Plan with population and household estimates and projections of the Department of Finance. (b) The department shall consult with the council of governments regarding requests submitted pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). The department may seek advice and consult with the Demographic Research Unit of the Department of Finance, the State Department of Transportation, a representative of a contiguous council of governments, U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.31 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act and any other party as deemed necessary. The department may request that the council of governments revise data, assumptions, or methodology to be used for the determination of regional housing need, or may reject the request submitted pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). Subsequent to consultation with the council of governments, the depart- ment will respond in writing to requests submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a). (c) if the council of governments does not submit a request pursuant to subdivision (a), or if the department rejects the request of the council of governments, the determination for the region shall be made pursuant to Sections 65584 and 65584.01. SEC. 10. Section 65584.04 of the Government Code is amended to read: 65584.04. (a)At least two years prior to a scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and coun- ties within the region or within the subregion, where applicable pursuant to this section. The methodology shall be consistent with the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. (b) (1) No more than six months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, each council of governments shall survey each of its member jurisdic- tions to request, at a minimum, information regarding the factors listed in subdivision (d) that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the factors established in subdivision (d). (2) The council of governments shall seek to obtain the information in a manner and format that is comparable throughout the region and utilize readily available data to the extent possible. (3) The information provided by a local government pursuant to this section shall be used, to the extent possible, by the council of govern- ments, or delegate subregion as applicable, as source information for the • methodology developed pursuant to this section. The survey shall state that none of the information received may be used as a basis for reducing 2.32 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 the total housing need established for the region pursuant to Section 65584.01. (4) If the council of governments fails to conduct a survey pursuant to this subdivision, a city, county, or city and county may submit informa- tion related to the items listed in subdivision (d) prior to the public com- mentperiod provided for in subdivision (c). (c) Public participation and access shall be required in the development of the methodology and in the process of drafting and adoption of the allocation of the regional housing needs. Participation by organizations other than local jurisdictions and councils of governments shall be solicit- ed in a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic seg- ments of the community. The proposed methodology, along with any rel- evant underlying data and assumptions, and an explanation of how infor- mation about local government conditions gathered pursuant to subdivi- sion (b) has been used to develop the proposed methodology, and how each of the factors listed in subdivision (d) is incorporated into the methodology, shall be distributed to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written request for the pro- posed methodology. The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall conduct at least one public hearing to receive oral and written comments on the proposed methodology. (d) To the extent that sufficient data is available from local governments pursuant to subdivision (b) or other sources, each council of govern- ments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall include the following factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs: (1) Each member jurisdiction's existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. (2) The opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing in each member jurisdiction, including all of the following: (A) Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state laws, regulations or regulatory actions, or supply and distribution deci- sions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infra- structure for additional development during the planning period. (B) The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.33 S B375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities. The council of governments may not limit its consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall consider the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding. (C) Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs, or both, designed to protect open space, farm- land, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis. (D) County policies to preserve prime agricultural land, as defined pursuant to Section 56064, within an unincorporated area. (3) The distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure. (4) The market demand for housing. (5) Agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county. (6) The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments, as defined in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, that changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment, subsidy contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions. (7) High-housing cost burdens. (8) The housing needs of farmworkers. (9) The housing needs generated by the presence of a private university or a campus of the California State University or the University of California within any member jurisdiction. (10)Any other factors adopted by the council of governments. 2.34 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 (e) The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, (t) shall explain in writing how each of the factors described in subdivision Any ordinance, (d) was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology is policy, voter- consistent with subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The methodology may approved meas- include numerical weighting. ure, or standard of a city or county (f) Any ordinance, policy, voter-approved measure, or standard of a city that directly or or county that directly or indirectly limits the number of residential build- indirectly numbeer r of eirectly limits f ing permits issued by a city or county shall not be a justification for a residential build- determination or a reduction in the share of a city or county of the ing permits regional housing need. issued by a city or county shall (g) In addition to the factors identified pursuant to subdivision (d), the not be a justifica- council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall identi- tion for a determi- fy any existing local, regional, or state incentives, such as a priority for nation or a reduc- funding or other incentives available to those local governments that are tion in the share willing to accept a higher share than proposed in the draft allocation to of a city or county those local governments by the council of governments or delegate subre- of the regional housing need. gion pursuant to Section 65584.05. • (h) Following the conclusion of the 60-day public comment period described in subdivision (c) on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions deemed appropriate by the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, as a result of com- ments received during the public comment period, each council of gov- ernments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall adopt a final region- al, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregion as applicable, and to the department. (i) (1) It is the intent of the Legislature that housing planning be coordinated and integrated with the regional transportation plan. To achieve this goal, the allocation plan shall allocate housing units within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sus- tainable communities strategy. (2) The final allocation plan shall ensure that the total regional housing need, by income category, as determined under Section 65584, is main- tained, and that each jurisdiction in the region receive an allocation of units for low- and very low income households. (3) The resolution approving the final housing need allocation plan shall demonstrate that the plan is consistent with the sustainable communities U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.35 $B375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act strategy in the regional transportation plan. SEC. 11. Section 65587 of the Government Code is amended to read: 65587. (a) Each city, county, or city and county shall bring its housing element, as required by subdivision (c) of Section 65302, into conformity with the requirements of this article on or before October 1, 1981, and the deadlines set by Section 65588. Except as specifically provided in subdivision (b) of Section 65361, the Director of Planning and Research shall not grant an extension of time from these requirements. (b)Any action brought by any interested party to review the conformity with the provisions of this article of any housing element or portion thereof or revision thereto shall be brought pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure; the court's review of compliance with the provisions of this article shall extend to whether the housing element or portion thereof or revision thereto substantially complies with the requirements of this article. (c) If a court finds that an action of a city, county, or city and county, which is required to be consistent with its general plan, does not comply with its housing element, the city, county, or city and county shall bring its action into compliance within 60 days. However, the court shall retain jurisdiction throughout the period for compliance to enforce its decision. Upon the court's determination that the 60-day period for compliance would place an undue hardship on the city, county, or city and county, the court may extend the time period for compliance by an additional 60 days. (d) (1) If a court finds that a city, county, or city and county failed to complete the rezoning required by subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583, as that deadline may be modified by the extension provided for in subdivision (f) of that section, the court shall issue an order or judgment, after considering the equities of the circum- stances presented by all parties, compelling the local government to com- plete the rezoning within 60 days or the earliest time consistent with pub- lic hearing notice requirements in existence at the time the action was filed. The court shall retain jurisdiction to ensure that its order or judg- ment is carried out. If the court determines that its order or judgment is not carried out, the court shall issue further orders to ensure that the pur- 2.36 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 poses and policies of this article are fulfilled, including ordering, after considering the equities of the circumstances presented by all parties, that any rezoning required by subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivi- sion (c) of Section 65583 be completed within 60 days or the earliest time consistent with public hearing notice requirements in existence at the time the action was filed and may impose sanctions on the city, coun- ty, or city and county. (2)Any interested person may bring an action to compel compliance with the deadlines and requirements of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583. The action shall be brought pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure. An action may be brought pursuant to the notice and accrual provisions of subdivision (d) of Section 65009. In any such action, the city, county, or city and county shall bear the burden of proof. SEC. 12. Section 65588 of the Government Code is amended to read: 65588. (a) Each local government shall review its housing element as frequently as appropriate to evaluate all of the following: (1) The appropriateness of the housing goals, objectives, and policies in contributing to the attainment of the state housing goal. (2) The effectiveness of the housing element in attainment of the community's housing goals and objectives. (3) The progress of the city, county, or city and county in implementation of the housing element. (b) Except as provided in paragraph (7) of subdivision (e), the housing element shall be revised as appropriate, but not less than every eight years, to reflect the results of this periodic review, by those local govern- ments that are located within a region covered by (1) a metropolitan plan- ning organization in a region classified as nonattainment for one or more pollutants regulated by the federal Clean Air Act or(2) a metropolitan planning organization or regional transportation planning agency that is required, or has elected pursuant to subparagraph (L) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080, to adopt a regional transportation plan not less than every four years, except that a local government that does not adopt a housing element within 120 days of the statutory deadline for U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.37 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act (2) adoption of the housing element shall revise its housing element as The number of appropriate, but not less than every four years. The housing element shall housing units for be revised, as appropriate, but not less than every five years by those persons and fam- local governments that are located within a region covered by a metro- dies of!ow or politan planning organization or regional transportation planning agency moderate that is required to adopt a regional transportation plan not less than every income, as defined in five years, to reflect the results of this periodic review. Nothing in this Section 50093 of section shall be construed to excuse the obligations of the local govern- the Health and ment to adopt a revised housing element no later than the date specified Safety in this section. Code, required to be provided (c) The review and revision of housing elements required by this section in new housing shall take into account any low - or moderate-income housing provided developments or required pursuant to Section 65590. either within the coastal zone (d) The review pursuant to subdivision (c) shall include, but need not be or within three limited to the following: • miles of the coastal zone... (1) The number of new housing units approved for construction within the coastal zone after January 1, 1982. (2) The number of housing units for persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, required to be provided in new housing developments either within the coastal zone or within three miles of the coastal zone pursuant to Section 65590. (3) The number of existing residential dwelling units occupied by persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, that have been authorized to be demolished or converted since January 1, 1982, in the coastal zone. (4) The number of residential dwelling units for persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, that have been required for replacement or authorized to be converted or demolished as identified in paragraph (3). The location of the replacement units, either onsite, elsewhere within the locality's juris- diction within the coastal zone, or within three miles of the coastal zone within the locality's jurisdiction, shall be designated in the review. (e) Notwithstanding subdivision (b) or the date of adoption of the hous- ing elements previously in existence, each city, county, and city and county shall revise its housing element according to the following sched- ule: 2.38 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 (1) Local governments within the regional jurisdiction of the Southern California Association of Governments: June 30, 2006, for the fourth revision. (2) Local governments within the regional jurisdiction of the Association of Bay Area Governments: June 30, 2007, for the fourth revision. (3) Local governments within the regional jurisdiction of the Council of Fresno County Governments, the Kern County Council of Governments, and the Sacramento Area Council of Governments: June 30, 2002, for the third revision, and June 30, 2008, for the fourth revision. (4) Local governments within the regional jurisdiction of the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments: December 31, 2002, for the third revision, and June 30, 2009, for the fourth revision. (5) Local governments within the regional jurisdiction of the San Diego Association of Governments: June 30, 2005, for the fourth revision. (6)All other local governments: December 31, 2003, for the third revision, and June 30, 2009, for the fourth revision. (7) (A) All local governments within a metropolitan planning organization in a region classified as nonattainment for one or more pollutants regulated by the federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 7506), except those within the regional jurisdiction of the San Diego Association of Governments, shall adopt the fifth revision of the housing element no later than 18 months after adoption of the first regional transportation plan to be adopted after September 30, 2010. (B) All local governments within the regional jurisdiction of the San Diego Association of Governments shall adopt their fifth revision no more than five years from the fourth revision and their sixth revision no later than 18 months after adoption of the first regional transportation plan to be adopted after the fifth revision due date. (C)All local governments within the regional jurisdiction of a metropolitan planning organization or a regional transportation planning agency that has made an election pursuant to subparagraph (L) of para- graph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080 shall be subject to the eight-year planning period pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 65588 and shall adopt its next housing element 18 months after adoption of the first regional transportation plan following the election. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.39 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act (I) For purposes of this article, "planning period" shall be the time period for periodic revision of the housing element pursuant to this section. SEC. 13. Section 21061.3 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read: 21061.3. "Infill site" means a site in an urbanized area that meets either of the following criteria: (a) The site has not been previously developed for urban uses and both of the following apply: (1) The site is immediately adjacent to parcels that are developed with qualified urban uses, or at least 75 percent of the perimeter of the site adjoins parcels that are developed with qualified urban uses, and the remaining 25 percent of the site adjoins parcels that have previously been developed for qualified urban uses. (2) No parcel within the site has been created within the past 10 years unless the parcel was created as a result of the plan of a redevelopment agency. (b) The site has been previously developed for qualified urban uses. SEC. 14. Chapter 4.2 (commencing with Section 21155) is added to Division 13 of the Public Resources Code, to read: Chapter 4.2. Implementation of the Sustainable Communities Strategy 21155. (a) This chapter applies only to a transit priority project that is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the project area in either a sustain- able communities strategy or an alternative planning strategy, for which the State Air Resources Board, pursuant to subparagraph (H) of para- graph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080 of the Government Code, has accepted a metropolitan planning organization's determination that the sustainable communities strategy or the alternative planning strategy would, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. 2.40 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 (b) For purposes of this chapter, a transit priority project shall (1) contain at least 50 percent residential use, based on total building square footage and, if the project contains between 26 percent and 50 percent nonresi- dential uses, a floor area ratio of not less than 0.75; (2) provide a mini- mum net density of at least 20 dwelling units per acre; and (3) be within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor included in a regional transportation plan. A major transit stop is as defined in Section 21064.3, except that, for purposes of this section, it also includes major transit stops that are included in the applicable regional transportation plan. For purposes of this section, a high-quality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. A proj- ect shall be considered to be within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor if all parcels within the project have no more than 25 percent of their area farther than one-half mile from the stop or corridor and if not more than 10 percent of the residential units or 100 units, whichever is less, in the project are farther than one-half mile from the stop or corridor. 21155.1. If the legislative body finds, after conducting a public hearing, that a transit priority project meets all of the requirements of subdivisions (a) and (b) and one of the requirements of subdivision (c), the transit pri- ority project is declared to be a sustainable communities project and shall be exempt from this division. (a) The transit priority project complies with all of the following environmental criteria: (I) The transit priority project and other projects approved prior to the approval of the transit priority project but not yet built can be adequately served by existing utilities, and the transit priority project applicant has paid, or has committed to pay, all applicable in-lieu or development fees. (2) (A) The site of the transit priority project does not contain wetlands or riparian areas and does not have significant value as a wildlife habitat, and the transit priority project does not harm any species protected by the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), the Native Plant Protection Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code), or the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.41 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), and the project does not cause the destruction or removal of any species protected by a local ordinance in effect at the time the application for the project was deemed complete. (B) For the purposes of this paragraph, "wetlands" has the same meaning as in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Manual, Part 660 FW 2 (June 21, 1993). (C) For the purposes of this paragraph: (i) "Riparian areas" means those areas transitional between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and that are distinguished by gradients in biophysical conditions, ecological process- es, and biota. A riparian area is an area through which surface and sub- surface hydrology connect waterbodies with their adjacent uplands. A riparian area includes those portions of terrestrial ecosystems that signifi- cantly influence exchanges of energy and matter with aquatic ecosystems. A riparian area is adjacent to perennial, intermittent, and ephemeral streams, lakes, and estuarine-marine shorelines. (ii) "Wildlife habitat" means the ecological communities upon which wild animals, birds, plants, fish, amphibians, and invertebrates depend for their conservation and protection. (iii) Habitat of"significant value" includes wildlife habitat of national, statewide, regional, or local importance; habitat for species protected by the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531, et seq.), the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), or the Native Plant Protection Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code); habitat identified as candi- date, fully protected, sensitive, or species of special status by local, state, or federal agencies; or habitat essential to the movement of resident or migratory wildlife. (3) The site of the transit priority project is not included on any list of facilities and sites compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. (4) The site of the transit priority project is subject to a preliminary endangerment assessment prepared by a registered environmental asses- sor to determine the existence of any release of a hazardous substance on the site and to determine the potential for exposure of future occupants to significant health hazards from any nearby property or activity. 2.42 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 (A) If a release of a hazardous substance is found to exist on the site, the (6) release shall be removed or any significant effects of the release shall be The transit priori- mitigated to a level of insignificance in compliance with state and federal ty project site is requirements. not subject to any of the following: (B) If a potential for exposure to significant hazards from surrounding [Acts of God] properties or activities is found to exist, the effects of the potential expo- sure shall be mitigated to a level of insignificance in compliance with state and federal requirements. (5) The transit priority project does not have a significant effect on historical resources pursuant to Section 21084.1. (6) The transit priority project site is not subject to any of the following: (A)A wildland fire hazard, as determined by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, unless the applicable general plan or zoning ordi- nance contains provisions to mitigate the risk of a wildland fire hazard. (B)An unusually high risk of fire or explosion from materials stored or used on nearby properties. (C) Risk of a public health exposure at a level that would exceed the standards established by any state or federal agency. (D) Seismic risk as a result of being within a delineated earthquake fault zone, as determined pursuant to Section 2622, or a seismic hazard zone, as determined pursuant to Section 2696, unless the applicable general plan or zoning ordinance contains provisions to mitigate the risk of an earthquake fault or seismic hazard zone. (E) Landslide hazard, flood plain, flood way, or restriction zone, unless the applicable general plan or zoning ordinance contains provisions to mitigate the risk of a landslide or flood. (7) The transit priority project site is not located on developed open space. (A) For the purposes of this paragraph, "developed open space" means land that meets all of the following criteria: (i) Is publicly owned, or financed in whole or in part by public funds. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.43 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act (ii) Is generally open to, and available for use by, the public. (iii) Is predominantly lacking in structural development other than structures associated with open spaces, including, but not limited to, playgrounds, swimming pools, ballfields, enclosed child play areas, and picnic facilities. (B) For the purposes of this paragraph, "developed open space" includes land that has been designated for acquisition by a public agency for developed open space, but does not include lands acquired with public funds dedicated to the acquisition of land for housing purposes. (8) The buildings in the transit priority project are 15 percent more ener- gy efficient than required by Chapter 6 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations and the buildings and landscaping are designed to achieve 25 percent less water usage than the average household use in the region. (b) The transit priority project meets all of the following land use criteria: (1) The site of the transit priority project is not more than eight acres in total area. (2) The transit priority project does not contain more than 200 residential units. (3) The transit priority project does not result in any net loss in the num- ber of affordable housing units within the project area. (4) The transit priority project does not include any single level building that exceeds 75,000 square feet. (5)Any applicable mitigation measures or performance standards or criteria set forth in the prior environmental impact reports, and adopted in . findings, have been or will be incorporated into the transit priority proj- ect. (6) The transit priority project is determined not to conflict with nearby operating industrial uses. (7) The transit priority project is located within one-half mile of a rail transit station or a ferry terminal included in a regional transportation plan or within one-quarter mile of a high-quality transit corridor included in a regional transportation plan. 2.44 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 (c) The transit priority project meets at least one of the following three (7) criteria: The transit priori- ty project is locat- (1) The transit priority project meets both of the following: ed within one-half (A) At least 20 percent of the housing will be sold to families of moder- mile of a rail ate income, or not less than 10 percent of the housing will be rented to transit station... families of low income, or not less than 5 percent of the housing is rented (B) to families of very low income. ...The transit pri- ority project (B) The transit priority project developer provides sufficient legal developer pro- commitments to the appropriate local agency to ensure the continued vides sufficient availability and use of the housing units for very low, low-, and legal commit- moderate-income households at monthly housing costs with an affordable ments to the housing cost or affordable rent, as defined in Section 50052.5 or 50053 of appropriate local the Health and Safety Code, respectively, for the period required by the agency to ensure applicable financing. Rental units shall be affordable for at least 55 years. the continued Ownership units shall be subject to resale restrictions or equity sharing availability and use of the hous- requirements for at least 30 years. ing units for very low, low-, and (2) The transit priority project developer has paid or will pay in-lieu fees moderate-income pursuant to a local ordinance in an amount sufficient to result in the households at development of an equivalent number of units that would otherwise be monthly housing required pursuant to paragraph (1). costs with an affordable (3) The transit priority project provides public open space equal to or housing cost or greater than five acres per 1,000 residents of the project. affordable rent... ...Rental units 21155.2. shall be afford- able for at least (a)A transit priority project that has incorporated all feasible 55 years.... mitigation measures, performance standards, or criteria set forth in the Ownership units prior applicable environmental impact reports and adopted in findings shall be subject made pursuant to Section 21081, shall be eligible for either the provisions to resale restric- of subdivision (b) or (c). tions or equity sharing require- (b)A transit priority project that satisfies the requirements of subdivision ments for at least 30 years. (a) may be reviewed through a sustainable communities environmental assessment as follows: (1) An initial study shall be prepared to identify all significant or • potentially significant impacts of the transit priority project, other than those which do not need to be reviewed pursuant to Section 21159.28 U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.45 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act based on substantial evidence in light of the whole record. The initial study shall identify any cumulative effects that have been adequately addressed and mitigated pursuant to the requirements of this division in prior applicable certified environmental impact reports. Where the lead agency determines that a cumulative effect has been adequately addressed and mitigated, that cumulative effect shall not be treated as cumulatively considerable for the purposes of this subdivision. (2) The sustainable communities environmental assessment shall contain measures that either avoid or mitigate to a level of insignificance all potentially significant or significant effects of the project required to be identified in the initial study. (3) A draft of the sustainable communities environmental assessment shall be circulated for public comment for a period of not less than 30 days. Notice shall be provided in the same manner as required for an environmental impact report pursuant to Section 21092. (4) Prior to acting on the sustainable communities environmental assessment, the lead agency shall consider all comments received. (5)A sustainable communities environmental assessment may be approved by the lead agency after conducting a public hearing, reviewing the comments received, and finding that: (A) All potentially significant or significant effects required to be identified in the initial study have been identified and analyzed. (B) With respect to each significant effect on the environment required to be identified in the initial study, either of the following apply: (i) Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance. (ii) Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. (6) The legislative body of the lead agency shall conduct the public hearing or a planning commission may conduct the public hearing if local ordinances allow a direct appeal of approval of a document prepared pur- suant to this division to the legislative body subject to a fee not to exceed 2.46 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 five hundred dollars ($500). (7) The lead agency's decision to review and approve a transit priority project with a sustainable communities environmental assessment shall be reviewed under the substantial evidence standard. (c) A transit priority project that satisfies the requirements of subdivision (a) may be reviewed by an environmental impact report that complies with all of the following: (1) An initial study shall be prepared to identify all significant or potentially significant effects of the transit priority project other than those that do not need to be reviewed pursuant to Section 21159.28 based upon substantial evidence in light of the whole record. The initial study shall identify any cumulative effects that have been adequately addressed and mitigated pursuant to the requirements of this division in prior appli- cable certified environmental impact reports. Where the lead agency determines that a cumulative effect has been adequately addressed and mitigated, that cumulative effect shall not be treated as cumulatively con- siderable for the purposes of this subdivision. (2)An environmental impact report prepared pursuant to this subdivision need only address the significant or potentially significant effects of the transit priority project on the environment identified pursuant to para- graph (1). It is not required to analyze off-site alternatives to the transit priority project. It shall otherwise comply with the requirements of this division. 21155.3. (a) The legislative body of a local jurisdiction may adopt traffic mitigation measures that would apply to transit priority projects. These measures shall be adopted or amended after a public hearing and may include requirements for the installation of traffic control improvements, street or road improvements, and contributions to road improvement or transit funds, transit passes for future residents, or other measures that will avoid or mitigate the traffic impacts of those transit priority projects. (b) (1) A transit priority project that is seeking a discretionary approval is not required to comply with any additional mitigation measures required by paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 21081, for the traffic impacts of that project on intersections, streets, highways, free- ways, or mass transit, if the local jurisdiction issuing that discretionary U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.47 SB375 California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act (2)(1) approval has adopted traffic mitigation measures in accordance with this ...does not section. restrict the authority of a (2) Paragraph (1) does not restrict the authority of a local jurisdiction to local jurisdiction adopt feasible mitigation measures with respect to the effects of a project to adopt feasible on public health or on pedestrian or bicycle safety. mitigation meas- ures with respect to the effects of a (c) The legislative body shall review its traffic mitigation measures and project on public update them as needed at least every five years. health or on pedestrian or SEC. 15. Section 21159.28 is added to the Public Resources Code, to bicycle safety. read: 21159.28(a) 21159.28. sustainable com- munities strafe- (a) If a residential or mixed-use residential project is consistent with the gy.. would, if use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies speci- implemented, achieve the lied for the project area in either a sustainable communitiesstrategy or an greenhouse gas alternative planning strategy, for which the State Air Resources Board emission reduc- pursuant to subparagraph (1) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of tion targets...then Section 65080 of the Government Code has accepted the metropolitan any findings or planning organization's determination that the sustainable communities other determine- strategy or the alternative planning strategy would, if implemented, Lions for an achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets and if the project exemption, a incorporates the mitigation measures required by an applicable prior negative declare- environmental document, then any findings or other determinations for an Lion. a mitigated exemption, a negative declaration, a mitigated negative declaration, a sus- negative declare- tamable communities environmental assessment, an environmental lion, communities report, or addenda prepared or adopted for the project pursuant to able communities environmental this division shall not be required to reference, describe, or discuss assessment, an environmental (1) growth inducing impacts; or impact report, or addenda pre- (2) any project specific or cumulative impacts from cars and pared or adopted light-duty truck trips generated by the project on global warming or the for the project regional transportation network. pursuant to this division shall not (b)Any environmental impact report prepared for a project described in be required to subdivision (a) shall not be required to reference, describe, or discuss a reference, reduced residential density alternative to address the effects of car and describe, or dis- cuss... light-duty truck trips generated by the project. (c) "Regional transportation network," for purposes of this section, means all existing and proposed transportation system improvements, including 2.48 _U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California California Sustainable Communties and Climate Control Act SB375 the state transportation system, that were included in the transportation SEC. 16. and air quality conformity modeling, including congestion modeling, for If the ommission the final regional transportation plan adopted by the metropolitan plan- on tate Mandates ning organization, but shall not include local streets and roads. Nothing determines that in the foregoing relieves any project from a requirement to comply with this act contains any conditions, exactions, or fees for the mitigation of the project's costs mandated impacts on the structure, safety, or operations of the regional transporta- by the state, reimbursement to tion network or local streets and roads. local agencies and school dis- (d)A residential or mixed-use residential project is a project where at tricts for those least 75 percent of the total building square footage of the project con- costs shall be silts of residential use or a project that is a transit priority project as made pursuant to defined in Section 21155. Part 7 (com- mencing with SEC. 16. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act Section 17500) of contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies Division 4 of Title and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (com- mencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. U.N. Agenda 21: Sustainable Development in California_ 2.49 IIn'' 111 1111 III I III IIII I IIIIIIIIIIII II Made in the USA 13425367R10039 Charleston,SC 09 July 2012 ' • . • • _.,.- ,. ,.. • . . . . , . . . - - , • _ _. , . _ - . . . , , • - - , ' . . -. ,-• _ - _ _ , -, • ----- ...•,- . - ..,.. _ . „.. ' - _- _, _ _ _ , _ -, • . ,4 ."...■4 4 '.- 44■ `.... ..,.. . -. 4.. ' -., I ' 4 :4 4 . , . ' -' . • . _._ . , . . .... • ,•• ---/- „ .L„. . • . . . . . . . , . _ • Sa ___....._ . . jai . .., ......____ __ __..... _ .. . . ... , _ .. . . . . .. . , . . . ,_. . , . _ .. _.. i -- affirsityin , ... . . , . . . . - . Psamonassil . . . . . ... ..... , J__ posisi _ 10 .01111 0 • 000simuil_0111 . .... ...._ . . . • . . - 10 • , . . • . 1 1. • . . . • ..., 0 01441 . _ .. . .... . _ . .. . • • . • . . . .. . . .„. . . .... .. . ....„..„ 4,1 • . „ '.,,. .- • :-- ,..r. , 0,004 . . .. .. • . • _ ...•__ , . • . . ... . .,. . . , . _ • . .. . _ __ . ..t..t7.7__ ISBN 9781582911168 90000 > 4 \I-: - - \- - •••■ --'-. , - - ---72-C--1, ,=•-z-- ----___ 1 .=•=-__.::--,7;-,..._7;eie)„:-„, \c-5;;:,:::::-,_„_,Hr---,si,.:-_,. _ 111 I 1,4 _ ..-_-ki;„___.::,,---___:_,-,--,--irc ----___<-1,:< ,... .„ , -__ 1 ;:•;--,.., I -'Z----_ ---, '--C.-I--_&-i-----.=" - -r"--•-..,-,2 A---r----_-.z-tr, Tz.-:':', „:“ / 24;.-->-----,j, - •-„, VC.-----L-I --- -'",--5"--" -- -I.,..."-i'''>:::?.,---c ---- /--- -"‘"--I----- --,;-:- / ••,.."”-- - /1.,. - •----___. 9 781582 911168 -- -`1;--- :'!' '- <)'------1/42"):-.;---.- / - -7-=?- % > : - -4itk s■la77-C4WPAA •-•,;\,_ ,.1,----..;„,-----,--, . -,;,,„(--,-4:-._„5:::.,--s-„,,,L -...,>:<:.-- -------.:xc-/.../,,,,-,----___4<„,,,, -"Olt' ...---- ---/"<;-•-•--- ----,_.,-',--,::,-;<,--,-;,- -7;--?..,,,_,C7M-, -'..•'_::•', / \--2f -------,;.--„z•-_ A at-W--it STAFF REPORT f~DbfINISTRATIVE SERVICES I~EPdR1'N1ENT Date: July 18, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013. NO INCREASE IN THE ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagrams and Assessments approve the Annual Engineer's Reports and order the levy and collection of the annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. There are no increases in these districts proposed for Fiscal Year 2012/2013. The Engineer's Reports are also on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts"). This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports for the Districts, identifies proposed Fiscal Year 2012/2013 assessment rates. The Engineer's Reports identify the required budget for each of the Districts, including the surplus, if any, remaining in the fund balance for any District. The Fiscal Year 2012/2013 budget for each District is: SLD 1 Budgeted Expenses $862,720 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - 768 700 Deficit from operating reserves $ 94,020 P494 The assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on arterial streets. The current assessment rate is $17.77 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $35.54 per acre. P495 CONSIDBI2ATf0N TO Al'PR0VL'I'HGRI3S0r.U17ON ROR S'112P:L; 1'LlGhrl'IlVG NGIINIENANCB DISIR]CCNOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 nNl~ 8 FOIL F1xnI.Yr~vz 2012/2013 JULY 18, 2012 PAGI:2 SLD 2 Budgeted Expenses $316,650 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - 331 810 Current operating reserve balance $ 15,160 The assessments in SLD 2 pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on local streets. The current assessment rate is $39.97 per sirigle-family residence. The commercial rate is $79.94 per acre. While budgeted expenses above would appear to be less than revenues as detailed above, this is actually not the case. Due to the ongoing, significant structural budget deficit in SLD 2, approximately $280,000 in costs for SLD 2 have been shifted to the Gas Tax budget for a number of years. The City Council discussed this matter and directed staff to limit the use of Gas Tax in this manner in future budgets, so that Gas Tax funds can be used for maintenance and infrastructure improvements. In order to address the SLD 2 operating deficit in a permanent manner, it is anticipated that a Prop 218 assessment ballot process will need to be considered during FY 12/13. SLD 3 Budgeted Expenses $331,380 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - 347 340 Contribution to operating reserve $ 15,960 The assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Victoria Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $47.15 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $94.30 per acre. SLD 4 Budgeted Expenses $189,810 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $163.080 Deficit from operating reserves $ 26,730 The assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $28.96 per single-family residence, the multi-family rate is $14.48 per dwelling unit, and the commercial rate is $57.92 per acre. SLD 5. Budgeted Expenses $70,470 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - 42 130 Deficit from operating reserves $28,340 The assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Caryn Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $34.60 per single-family residence. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $14,760.00. At the current level of expenditures it will likely be necessary to conduct a Prop 218 ballot process in 2013, or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. P496 CONSIDEItA"170N TO AI'PRO\'I?'I'IiI1: RI tiOLUIION FOR S'ntl I?I' LIGhr17NG IVG\L\~1TN~~1C8 DISIRICI' NOti. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 nND 8 FOR FtsCw.Yl~vt 2012/2013 JULY 18, 2012 PAGE2 SLD 6 Budgeted Expenses $144,370 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - 126 070 Deficit from operating reserves $ 18,300 The assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $51.40 per acre for commercial property. SLD 7 Budgeted Expenses $229,510 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - 115 140 Deficit from operating reserves $114,370 The assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the North Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $33.32 per single-family residence. This will completely deplete the reserve balance. At the current level of expenditures it will likely be necessary to conduct a Prop 218 ballot process in 2013, or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. SLD 8 Budgeted Expenses $160,720 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - 117 300 Operating reserves $ 43,420 The assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $61.19 per single-family residence. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Engineer's Reports P497 RESOLUTION NO. 12-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND THE ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 20th day of June, 2012, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 12-094 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance Districts No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"); and WHEREAS, subsequent to the preliminary approval of the Annual Engineer's Reports, the Assessment Engineer revised each of the Annual Engineer's Reports (each a "Revised Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Revised Annual Engineer's Reports") to add to such reports information regarding the annexations, if any, to each applicable District during Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and to make certain other insubstantial formatting revisions to the summary of assessments and the District budgets that did not result in an increase of the expenditure budget for the Districts, or any one of them, or the aggregate assessments or any individual assessment proposed to be levied within the Districts, or any one, of them; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: P498 SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. Notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and b. The annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Report for each of the Districts, are hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the Districts in the amounts as set forth in applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2012. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same ~ manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2012 and ending June 30, 2013. P499 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2012. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P500 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) P501 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (ARTERIAL STREETS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P502 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ....:............................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............:...............................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General ............................................................................. .......................................... 9 Special Benefit ................................................................. ..........................................9 General Benefit ................................................................ ........................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................14 P503 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12 - 094, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2072/13 Total Estimated Assessment $784,130.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 15 430.00 Total Estimated Revenue $768,700.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 94 020.00 Total Expenditure Budget ~ $862,720.00 Total District EDU Count 44,126.66 Actual Assessment per EDU $17.77 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $17.77 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P5O4 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Nt. C053672 Ezp.6.301 3 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P505 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's' Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers tc the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P506 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason far the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P507 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 Z ~ ~, m ~ s ~ ~ - s, d ~ ~ v , 'n N O C m ~ Q ~ O m ~ ~ W ~, U ~ "' C cn (~ U m ~ nvnaa3Ho y o LL J O ~ J H3 = m t rc 1 8 0 ~+ nv 1SN3 LL tl Ise3 C I ~ Cd ~ Z ~ tlevue^~13 ~ C nbb,ONV M1 Z N 3 nVVONtlM113 LL y ~/ PuaM!13 ~ 13 3 o N _ 1 •L Q - ~~ ~ F N ~ Mw~a RU I~ Sl/ ~ fA le N33a~ nva .i ~,~ IM ~ O N a m N Q~ ~ ny lalse4x ~ SL'I C V nv a31s3Haoa ~! ~~ ~ ~ L r _ y ntl seVaoH R C V) ~ _ N r V Z ~ uey!II!W Z O ntl 3NIllIW ~ m _o ~~ ~ > a m ctl ~ ~ O ~ 'a O ~ ~ v~i F S ~ ny ueneH ~ x k ~ uaneH O y ~v nv N3nVH + ~ b K J ~ tl esouuaH «O ~~ J m sow~aH ~ +-' w < nvusowa3H d J ~ ~+ = Z O ~ ~ v) _ ` tlMe9!4aM ~ w ~ ~ O ~ nv al tl9 lHOatl ea!wro v, ` W r (n ntl 1S/.H13WV m = U rn = ntl uewllaH H nv NVWll3H n ~tl uewlleH y rn N 1S 1Aa39 .., Z i _ Q m ,u `tl P~e6auip m ~ ~ F ~ ~ m r iS uellaurep Q ~MMM-~ 1SNVIl3NaV~ O m N r W K ao `a :: O ~ Q - % e''-mazer ` yEy:~` a~ MF~ ddVS 1S 3aI o: aet 5 E = ~ yanoi~ y Ca ~ ~ .'~~-" v _ t ; -_ ~e-eQ~v35t`> z 5'E 6.~G ~ =L¢jFSA~ = d n'i~9~r g ~.: Ej ~ ~ e ~f , sya y€~ a 5 E a . ; E ~. b G .?, 3 E ~5 5E@ P509 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012/13 Bud et Persohnel Services Regular Payroll $22,090.00 Part-time Salaries 13,340.00 Fringe Benefits 12.300.00 Subtotal Personnel $47,730.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 4,940.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 800.00 Electric Utilities 612,160.00 Assessment Administration 158,200.00 General Overhead 33,420.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $814,990.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $862,720.00 Total Estimated Assessment $784,130.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (15.430.00) Total Estimated Revenue $768,700.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 94.020.00 Total Expenditure Budget $862,720.00 Total Estimated Assessment $784,129.73 Total District EDU Count 44,126.68 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $17.77 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $17.77 `Includes rounding as each parcel's annual assessment must be rounded down to the nearest even cent for County tax roll purposes. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P510 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $997,066.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (94,020.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $903,066.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA dues. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Telephone: This item includes the costs for master controllers for dial-in data lines for uploading, downloading and observing system operations for traffic signals. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P511 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P512 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel wi116enefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574).. , . Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P513 • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P514 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential - 1.00 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Property Type Allowable Actual (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Rate Total Total er EDU er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Single Family Residential $17.77 $17.77 27,573.00 27,573.00 Multi-family Residential 17.77 17.77 10,387.00 10,387.00 Non Residential 17.77 17.77 3,083.30 6,166.60 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P515 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P517 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012113 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $17.77 27,573.00 27,573.00 $489,972.21 Multi-family Residential 17.77 10,387.00 10,387.00 184,576.99 Non Residential 17.77 3,083.30 6,166.60 109,580.53 TOTALS 4,1043.30 44,126.60 $784,129.73 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $17.77 27,573.00 ~ 27,573.00 $489,972.21 Multi-family Residential 17.77 10,387.00 10,367.00 184,576.99 Non Residential 17.77 3,083.30 6,166.60 109,580.53 TOTALS 4,1043.30 44,126.60 $784,129.73 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P518 Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Annexation Total Total Property Type Parcel Number Date Pro'ect Units/Acres EBUs Coun Use Code 0225-191-12 03/02/11 TR 17651 56 SFD 56.00 Single-Family Residential 0226-102-02 03/02/11 TR18708 7 SFD 7.00 Single-Family Residential 1077-422-21, 22 04/06/11 TR 18782 192 Units 134.40 Multi-Family Residential and 1077-422-25 0225-161-65 and 07/06/11 TR 18032 23 SFD 23.00 Single-Family Residential 0225-161-71 0227-131-03, 08 01/18/12 TR 18806 33 SFD 33.00 Single-Family Residential and 0227-131-62 0207-022-56 03/07/12 DRC2011- 1 SFD 1.00 Single-Family Residential 00645 &~ Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P519 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) P520 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Faz: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P521 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment ............................:................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ...........................................................:................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General ............................................................................. ..........................................9 Special Benefit ................................................................. ..........................................9 General Benefit ................................................................ ........................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P522 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City'), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12 - 094, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012/13 Total Estimated Assessment $348,470.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 16 660.00 Total Estimated Revenue $331,810.00 Less Reserve Fund Collection 15 160.00 Total Expenditure Budget $316,650.00 Total District EDU Count 8,718.32 Actual Assessment per EDU $39.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $39.97 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P523 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineers Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. ,PprcaaiuNq ;PNpREWST~Fy~ N0. C053572G~' `~o Mark A. Steuer, Director of En sneer Services, Cit En sneer Fxp.6.30. 1 ~ x 9 Y 9 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P524 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The Ciry cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P525 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P526 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the residential areas of the City west of Haven Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 zQ N m a o = ~~ s,, ~ a~ ~ N m W ~ ~ ~ ~ U w m ~ htl ALIb3H~ - • ~ i.~.._.._.._..Q ~ j - ~ o J ~ j N ~ > ~ Z/ys _ ~~ ., m _ ~ fA ° r.. C _e .. - AV 1SV3 I. tlLSe3 N N d ! > I m 1 a Z ~ ntl ePUemi13• ~ ~ G ~ ~nbb4 N~ ;3 NVtlONtlM113 S~% Pue.viL3 N ,« O ~ NdM113 .~. ~LL u ~ F ~ 3~ _o m b VJ ~ - a~ co N 18-N33a~ AVO - 9 ~ _ W ¢ ~ .~ ~ (~ •ntl ~alsa4x• ~ ~ a • ~~ -~ Shl V Z C ~V TJ31S3H~ON .~ ~= Isayxy c~ C to ~' . y h .F~ V ~ Z ~ fr - - uaHilllW ,~ ~. f._..~..w++arwww a o [4V_N3NIlll\ 1 } O G V m '~ w _ G L Q N r K o = -~ S ane ~ N by N3hUH .k _ yuaneH ~ +N+ ~ +~ J L n~esowiaH w "' m O- - ~-n esouuaH y,L W~ .a hV.VSOW213H - 1_ ~ r.+ x O w N O~ „ ~ ntl Ple ,4ary ~ ~ Z = O IeQ!4vy N ~ ~ w ~ u! nvalvew~av c~ L ~ +~ ~y ~ ~i~~1S.1W13WV m = N •/• O _ _ v~ ntl uewllaH ~ /~V NNWll3H ~ r tl uewllaH r ~. z m Yf ~ a Lsli,~fe„- i ~F Q ~ ~w ry~ !- F tl P~e6eui~ r m ~CY N f- LS ue9awe~ L~ ~ p~ lS NVIl3N2JV~ ~~~ O m F w _ _ ~ m ~ s .~ _ ~' isaalH~~ v ~ a z a p ~ tl enoi~ t ~ o m s - - dr gyp a$°_ =i:. _ m _y°~~.L :.g~ ~g c B c ~s ,. =o = 5 NYC 5€ d5 g. u_ U _ Y~ ,4 € ; E e ~ 6 €~:F'~~a~6C 3a~3 Jae P528 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012/13 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Training ~ $0.00 Membership Dues 0.00 Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contrail Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 278,170.00 Assessment Administration 36,330.00 General Overhead 2,150.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $316,650.00 Capital Expenditures Caoital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $316,650.00 Total Estimated Assessment $384,470.0 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 116.660.00) Total Estimated Revenue $331,810.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Collection (15.160.00) Total Expenditure Budget $316,650.00 Total Estimated Assessment $348,471.24 Total District EDU Count 8,718.32 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $39.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $39.97 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P529 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $0.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 15.160.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $15,160.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: healtti care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA dues. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report; resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P530 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P531 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which faidy distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (o/the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P532 • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified'and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1983, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P533 Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 1.00 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Single Family Residential $39.97 $39.97 6,575.00 6,575.00 Multi-family Residential 39.97 39.97 2,063.00 2,063.00 Non Residential 39.97 39.97 40.16 80.32 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P534 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 N ~ ~~ V °~ N `1V °~! ~' N ~ a ~ ~° ~ ~ ~ I ~ U vl ® ~ ~ o V ~ ~ i\_ ny ~(JJay~ p) ti /_/ ~ ; .._.._.._.._ ~ ~~ J 1.r o •V i N N C ~ I N m ~ O I ,~ ~ 3 0 °~ ~ m ti i ~ ® ~ nH ise3 cn •F+ I v j i ny epueM!;3 ~ ny epueM!;3 °~ i 1 ~ 1 ~ ~g ~aaJ~ ~(ep . •_.._.._.._.._.._ _..I y ny Ja;sayooa ! n Ja sa o0 I d ; y 2i ,~..~ i ny ua~!II!W r._.._.._.._....._ ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ' ~ .^^^- ny uaneH ny esowlaH '~ -^.^- ny esowlaH ny Pleq!4oJb' nH Pley!4o1H ~~-^^^- ny uewllaH ^ ~ ny uewllaH ~ s r ~ ny pJe~auln ;g ue!lawe~ ss ~~L~igEEEPG°~ ~ nt/an01~ sf° fi ~gg~g§§~ ppgEB 9°3; s v (n ~ Oo ¢ ~Ei .B~Q°~°g D! c m u. ~~~~g=gEiiZea§~p ~ T gpp66~~2°g9~~Fi88fi = m gg~~~E~~ja~~€ ~@ s ~° Ea~3aga~~~~ s U ~a~°&EE :fee P536 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012113 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $39.97 6,575.00 6,575.00 $262,802.75 Multi-family Residential 39.97 2,063.00 2,063.00 84,458.11 Non Residential 39.97 40.16 80.32 3,210.38 TOTALS 8,678.16 6,718.32 $348,471.24 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $39.97 6,575.00 6,575.00 $262,802.75 Multi-family Residential 39.97 2,063.00 2,063.00 84,458.11 Non Residential 39.97 40.16 80.32 3,210.38 TOTALS 8,678.16 8,716.32 $348,471.24 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexation is effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Annexation Total Total Property Type Parcel Number Date Pro'ect Units/Acres EBUs Coun Use Code 0207-022-56 03/07/12 DRC2011- 1 SFD 1.00 Single-Family Residential 00645 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P537 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) P538 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P539 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General .......................................................................................................................9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P540 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City'), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12 - 094, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The fallowing table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012/13 Total Estimated Assessment $350,570.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 3 230.00 Total Estimated Revenue $347,340.00 Less Reserve Fund Collection 15 960.00 Total Expenditure Budget $331,380.00 Total District EDU Count 7,435.16 Actual Assessment per EDU $47.15 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $47.15 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineers Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P541 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. t,OFES5i0,yq~ PapPEWSlFG~ F Nc. Cp59512 ~ Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services, City Engineer Exp.6~3a 1 3 ~ Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P542 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2012113 P543 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior tc the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P544 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the I-210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Avenue, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway and east of Haven Avenue, also known as the Victoria Planned Community, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements-and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 PFd~. ~i L f ys` ~ . Q Atl~1Stl3 ° ._..~..~.._..~..~..~. ~..~..~..~..~. ~ ~ " Z ~ = ~ S' ~ rn c 7 0 w _ = v ~ ~ m Z' J v > _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '_ °-~ o LL ~yS~ ~ in m U m U M ° U y' m ~ _ N • • • t • • ••w • • ••• /~tl VONVMIl3 In U H (7 • • • ••••••• •V• f 4 • • • • • • ••• i• • • i i • • i • ~ • • • • •••• •: • • w ••• . t t • • • N• • . ; y •. • . • • •w•~ t ~ • LL ~ • • • M •• • • • • • • • ••• ••• •: •••f • • • • •• • • ~ • • • • ~ ~ • • •t••1 N ~•• :~: `•iiy ••: ••••r••~i ••••• •M• ~ • •• • • ~~ : •• • • • • ~f•• • •••t• ~ ~ S :• Z F- ~ ••• • : ••• t. ~••~ r : • tt . r.: w ~ o • • ,•,• •• •• • •...•i••.• . ~ o t. ~ ~, p •••fi 4E ••~• • • • i i. i •• :•~•••~ Q NO 39 • • S Q l9N ~3?J~ { ~•~ . •~ ~•.~ ~.. t':•~ t •~: •~ v 19 N3321~.1b0 : r• • i • :tt ; ... .: .. :.:.;.. ; t 0 0 N Z •• ••• f •yN4• ~~//~~ V/ Y •t : i i = •••••• it N Q •t :tt • •• t•M• i.. N m ~Z • O ~ • t• •:: t 0 S .• • • ~ I : •~ s• .~.~ ~ ~ .f •.. .• tiff y x ~ gk~ s o . rG •., . f .•. •. • ~:•j •.~ •t • ..• ; • : : •::•..: Q w. ' • O • ••• • •f••t~ • • •••••~.•~ V t1• •••:•• ••: :: :J ••y • ~••••S • f _ = ~ i1 44•'•N • ••~•: •~••f • • ••q •N• t~ ~ _ a ~ • I•~•••• ~V,N3NIEllIW 4 f ••• ~ ~ (n ~ ° ••:v t: p~•~1•'•• 3. may.; ~ ++ ~ C o y ~ g • ••••: f: • •iu••• ~a L 2 lq • • i f • • •t• j•t• i a~ 8~~ L G L p • s•: ••~ •t~•' ~ 'a N W i '~• •• t i • ~ ~. • ~ L . s~. _ _ a, o N ~ ~ .. ors°,^.V~ 5V r: `p PC~_S.3 n~:.~~~ } L r *, ~ frSLEL~iS~i~o~~ S . 6 y. ww,, s.. a e a=bs3=31 ~~ ~5 7 , C7 5 0 ~ W L e ° a°=~E `e .°pz~~. i5.~a'@525Yx e~c3c a a a J , 6 6 N ~ fib e 5€ 3~E~,~ r..~=` ~ ..IU ~i W~ - e°~~t SE€~~ ~E_~3 ~~ P546 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2012/13 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $22,090.00 Part-time Salaries 13,340.00 Fringe Benefits 12.300.00 Subtotal Personnel ~ $47,730.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 9,940.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00. Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 233,800.00 Assessment Administration 35,190.00 General Overhead 4,150.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $283,650.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $331,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $350,570.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 3.2( 30.00) Total Estimated Revenue $347,340.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Collection (15.960.00) Total Expenditure Budget $331,360.00 Total Estimated Assessment $350,567.77 Total District EDU Count 7,435.16 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $47.15 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $47.15 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P547 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year.- The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the Ciry expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $1,051,670.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (0.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 15.960.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $1,067,630.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P548 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratina Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P549 . METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Secfion 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P550 • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1982, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P551 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EDU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 1.00 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Single Family Residential $47.15 $47.15 6,347.00 6,347.00 Multi-family Residential 47.15 47.15 589.00 589.00 Non Residential 47.15 47.15 249.58 499.16 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P552 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 M ~ ~~ V ~~ y Q a ' I .a ~ ~ ~ ® ~ U ~ ~n ~ . ~~ - ny ~(JJa4~ ~ t o V r J ti .._.._.._.._ ~ ' o ~ u~ N c ~ I m ~ o 1 m ,~ ~ 0 m 3 0 t ~_ 0 lL Q 1 - i ._.._.._. ................y ! nd lSe3 ~ i ® i , ~ •Fr ~ .1; i nt/ epuenul3 -"-"-" ~ ny epuenn!13 J ! s. ~~ ~~ i ! ~ ~8 ~aaJ~ Rea ` . ^^^ i a_.._.._.._.._.._.._..1 1 y ny Jalsayooa ~ i n Ja sa o0 i d l y 2i ~ ,~.. i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.. (°- -i ny ua~!II!W i i i i i i ny uaneH ! - ! -__ i my uaneH i i _ ny esowJaH j ! ny esowJaH i 1 nV PIeQ!4oJ`d - e nd PIe9!yoJH i ny uewllaH i ~,~.•~•' i ~ ny uewllaH 1 mil" L L v i ' iD ! ny pJe~(au !n 3S ue!lawe~ ~ - - i I ~^_~1 ! ~Bf~eHi° ?i~~ v 1 .. .. sSSagfi£3~p. i•@ •_. ~. y ~« V) ~_ m w J = ~ 3 ~ ~ 4 g'e!~a to s?€Ex~r5a~a ~ ~ O ~ B ye ~ °~gl $S 'D ~ C (0 [D LL Q £ s g ` i H gq' N "d0 C g ~tl~~ ~!i N l0 m ~ Fe6 fiCF, 3E•t•Ei! t Y ~€ 2 ~ g~~Ee ps 8 i t~ e3 49~'LSE4E*2g ~ S le p W~ U 6 a a ll El E~jg$e$ ~ ~E€e ds~off-E P554 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $47.15 6,347.00 6,347.00 $299,261.05 Multi-family Residential 47.15 589.00 569.00 27,771.35 Non Residential 47.15 249.56 499.16 23,535.37 TOTALS 7,185.56 7,435.16 $350,567.77 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $47.15 6,347.00 6,347.00 $299,261.05 Multi-family Residential 47.15 569.00 589.00 27,771.35 Non Residential 47.15 249.58 499.16 23,535.37 TOTALS 7,185.58 7,435.16 $350,587.77 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012113 P555 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) P556 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P557 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment ......................................................................:......................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General ............................................................................. ..........................................9 Special Benefit ................................................................. ..........................................9 General Benefit ................................................................ ........................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 72 ASSESSMENT ROLL 13 P558 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City'), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 094, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012/13 Total Estimated Assessment $159,510.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 3 570.00 Total Estimated Revenue $163,080.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 26 730.00 Total Expenditure Budget $189,810.00 Total District EDU Count 5,508.06 Actual Assessment per EDU $28.96 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $28.96 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P559 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer s Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, Director Of Engineering Services, City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P560 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest.which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imoosinc Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P561 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P562 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Terra Vista Planned Community, which is located north of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue, east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road and includes the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary casts associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 .J t v U (n A " ~ ° m0 m ~~~~ ~~ :_ _ ~ ;va3is3H~oa .~ •-. ~ • • - L ~~ ~~~~~~ • ~~ ~~ Roc f _ ~ W 1O U ~, ~ c .~ -..-.~ •~ ! \ •.,C ~. Y_~_. {/ ce • v J ~ • ~, I ~ ~ ar .i ~ •.[ w L FQ w ~' t/_~ ~ Z a •/ ~ ~~ /•, ~ ~ i / / A ~ ,w • . % • ~.~ ~L Q. ~ ~• ' }/ fA ~ ,~ ~ ~ r . ~ Ln CV - ~ ~ j ~ '~ O m ~ .~ V _ ~ ~ • YY ~ ~a ~ • ~ ~ V AV N3NIllIW j7 • i • W ~ O C~ C ~ w ~ ~. •f'-•~~ ~' ~ > • z ~ !' •-~ W Y a.•_•^ ~ O d r - ~ ~ • •-s ~ l y ~ ~_ • •'.• Lil • • W ~] i+ • •- • • • a t+ < a ~_ qa ~ ~ I f ~ ~ ~ WZ ~ ~ ~~~ } ~ O Y • -~ • / x n ~ ~ ~ . j L ~ {r //~~~~ • OUa , • • m J __ y ~ YI •- i` ~ --• 1 ~ J = ~~ __ L ,N •~ 1 -•__• • ~ •"• F ~-_ p ~~ • • _ __ _• • ~ • ~ \ ~ T ~ ~ ~ J~ ~ a e [ses _ } ~~ • •`L~ ` ~ G ~ E -EP _• . ~ " . t )r ~ h ' ` ~ \ ~ yg°5' E:9r~ _ • ~ •..f ((( ~ • ` •'n• ~ • ~ t ~ ~. \ \ ~~ec-5x8@~8cz< _o E L '°` S S ^• °i ~ • • ~ .t ~ ~ .. ~ • s ~ ~ __ \~~ -~_._ E~`e A e nEe°_Sa. . ° _v°E9v Syr Y$°~~ ig ~- . t -•_~_•-. • ~ ~ . y iCy ~ HAVEN AV N3~ VH P564 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated casts of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2012/13 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $47,730.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 4,940.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 110,060.00 Assessment Administration 22,990.00 General Overhead 3,380.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $142,080.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $189,810.00 Total Estimated Assessment $159,510.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 3.570.00 Total Estimated Revenue $163,080.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 26.730.00 Total Expenditure Budget $189,810.00 Total Estimated Assessment $159,513.41 Total District EDU Count 5,508.06 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $28.96 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $28.96 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P565 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance ~ $553,630.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (26,730.00) Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $526,900.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P566 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Interfund Allocation: This item is for night time field verification of street lights working and daytime matching of pole numbers against invoices received to ensure accurate billing. The budget is divided evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Capital Expenditures: Caoital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtehant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P567 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2012113 P568 • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. - Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P569 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 0.50 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Single Family Residential $28.96 $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 Multi-family Residential 28.96 28.96 4,726.00 2,363.00 Non Residential 28.96 28.96 246.53 493.06 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P570 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 ~• ~ ~N V 'i w,w Y/ ~ J V ~ a ~° ~ ~ ® ~ 1 ~ U ~ ~n i _ ~ ~ ce- ny ti~a4~ , of ti V i •V i N N C 1 w m ~ o t ~ m ~ o 3 ~ ~~ 1 1 li Q i - -.._. ~..~ _.._ _.._.. i n`d lse3 in G +.r i i L <r = i ny epuenn!;3 """"' ~ ny epueMg3 ,~ i - ~ i J ! ' i ~ ~e ~aa~~ ~(ea i ~ ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.y 1 ny ~a;sayoob ! y n ~a sa o0 i d 3 4 a ,...3 i 1 i ny ua~!II!W ~._.._.._.._.._.._ - i ny ua~!II!W i i i i i i ny uaneH ~ 1 i my uaneH i i ny esow~aH ~ (~ ! ny esow~aH i 1 n'd Pleq!4o~t/ i^b Pleq!4o~`d i i ny uewllaH i ~.-~" ~ ny uewllaH i ter" L L i i co i ny p~e~(au ~ !n 3S uepawe~ ~ i i i .. i .r~~ ! ~=8~1 a Y~s~a I~ : •~ .~ L ~ -• ' a y icy?:Y~ L 8 =a~i $ € s ~ : ~.._.. . ~ .._. ti.._..--- - - ny anal $ F ; d€ a= 5 ~ 4 e°~ `$°i$° ~ 0_' C l6 m O LL Q s~ g ~~s sE~a~~~ ~ & ~n ~si9E ~5'.~ v) N m ~ Y 61sez~~{ia~S 2 g€i g~pyEg, ~. ' g~~ e a~~ a d =E § EJ~6g~"' EE 8 ~ ~ &?~~ '~~ b c a E P572 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 $76,801.92 Multi-family Residential 28.96 .4,726.00 2,363.00 66.432.48 Non Residential 28.96 246.53 493.06 14,279.02 TOTALS 7,624.53 5,508.06 $159,513.41 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 $76,801.92 Multi-family Residential 28.96 4,726.00 2,363.00 68.432.48 Non Residential 28.96 246.53 493.06 14,279.02 TOTALS 7,624.53 5,508.06 $159,513.41 A copy of the full assessment roll is available far review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexation is effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Annexation Total Total Property Type Parcel Number Date Pro'ect UnitslAcres EBUs Coun Use Code 1077-422-21' 22 04/06/11 TR 18782 192 Units 96.00 Multi-Family Residential and 1077-422-25 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P573 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) P574 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P575 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General ....................................................................................................................... 9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P576 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 094, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012/13 Total Estimated Assessment $44,150.80 Less Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 2 020.00 Total Estimated Revenue $42,130.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 26 340.00 Total Expenditure Budget $70,470.00 Total District EDU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EDU $34.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $34.60 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P577 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Nc. C053572 ' Exp 6.30.1 3 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscaf Year 2012/13 Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services, City Engineer P578 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of ttie assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property awned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P579 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P580 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of the I-210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, west of Rochester Avenue and east of Milliken Avenue, also known as the Caryn Planned Community. The boundaries also include Tract No. 13835 east of Rochester Avenue and Tracts No. 13748, 13857 8 13858 west of Milliken Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 noon ~ ~ ~ Z' ---------------- - - a i o rn ~ -`00 0 O 0 N ~ - y ? O N - - p m (n m N U D ~ to U cA • • • • • 1 • • • • ~tl 2131S3H~OTJ • • _ ~ • ~ --- • G • • • a ~ Z ~ ' '~'~ O ~ • • • z° g = - N O • • _ . Q ~ N ~ . ~+ z • • ~ ~ 2 • • • • ¢ °~ • ~ • (A ~ V • ~ • • • ( = ~ ~ • • • •_r ~ .~ • • N GI •G. ~/ O ~ •~ ~ I _ • • • • / • ~ , • ~ ~ _ • ~ N ~ _ ~ -• • ~ ~ Z y ~_ ~ • ~~• • •~ • • ~ ~ ~ K p Y J ~ ~ • ~ ~ o N ~-+ • •~ a N G1 J ~ ~ LL - o ~ - ,~L,, nV N3NIllIW ~ rfr_s--~ ~ ~s-.•_•~ • ~ ~ • • ~ ~• ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ • • _ • • ~ - g . a ~g°.-E`e a _vo ~ 59~ s - ~ - • vo. __ . " 5y6' T e °'Y • e E x-VE-.°s~ 'sz I N z o- x 2 - 2 x ~y p. _ o a E ~s se s E - z < ~~/U W J ' - fit.a rxs x € ~ y C-$e@sx E `g 3e r I ~i v C'n S~6F-ax 5~~ic9i'. 's 5i. P582 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012/13 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $6,900.00 Part-time Salades 0.00 Fringe Benefits 3.240.00 Subtotal Personnel $9,950.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 7,440.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 44,530.00 Assessment Administration 7,020.00 General Overhead 1,130.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $60,330.00 Capital Expenditures _ Capital Projects ~- 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $60,700.00 Total Estimated Assessment $44,150.80 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 2 O( 20.801 Total Estimated Revenue $42,130.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 28.340.00 Total Expenditure Budget ~ $70,470.00 Total Estimated Assessment $44,149.60 Total District EDU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $34.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $34.60 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5-City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P583 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $43,100.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (28,340.00) Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $14,760.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Trainin :International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5-City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P584 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P585 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P586 • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that.may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1986, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P587 Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and unitslacreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EDU Rate per EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Single Family Residential $34.60 $34.60 1,276 1,276 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to'the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. t Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P588 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 w ~~ V •~ N +r y a' .o ~ o ~ 1 ~ U ~ ® ~n 0 0 V ~ i~ ny ~(JJay~ . rn t C ; .._.._.._.._ ~ J 1.r o /w N ~V i ~ N C _ 1 ~ m K o ~ i ~ w 3 o Q •~ ' m LL Q 1 -_ ._.._.._.._....._.._.._.._.._• i ® ~ ny lse3 N ~r i i r v .L i ny epuenn!33 -~~-~~-~~ ~ ny epueM!33 ,~ ~, J ~ ~ i i i ~ ~g ~aaJ~ ~(e4 i ~ ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. i y ny Jalsayooa i ny Jalsayaoa ,~.. i i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._.._- i ny ua~!II!W i i i i i i ny uaneH i i i my uaneH i _ i ny esowJaH ~ - ! ny esowJaH i i ny PIe9!4oJH i __e i ind Pleq!4oJV i i ny uewllaH i ~•~" ~ ny uewllaH 1 ~t~• N t r ~ ~ ~ i ~ ny pJe~(au!n 3S uepawe~ ~ i ~:1 i 4l6i~3EpB§a° ~ 'p ~ L e i 4g~'a t.._.._ .•~ ~ ~.._:''Y.._..°_ _ _f nt/anOJ~ sagas fi~=~~5~€ ~ c m LL _ yy(( 3 ~ ~ ~aP~S a~~~ F~ ,~ C ~s 3 m ~gg~=$~~Yffea ~° E3~6R8?c~Qgs ~v Ese:i°~ ~` a Let~gLFaE~e P590 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Count Use Code er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $34.60 1,276 1,276 $44,149.60 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $34.60 1,276 1,276 $44,149.60 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012113 P591 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) P592 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERC IAL/IN DUSTRIAL) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Prc Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P593 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services .....................................:..........................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General .......................................................................................................................9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P594 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No.12 - 094 a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and eMent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2072/13 Total Estimated Assessment $729,490.00 Less Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 3 420.00 Total Estimated Revenue $128,070.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 18 300.00 Total Expenditure Budget $144,370.00 Total District EDU Count 2,519.35 Actual Assessment per EDU $51.40 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $51.40 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P595 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship tc the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Nc. C053672 ' ~, Irsai a of Engineering Services, City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P596 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P597 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Streef Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P598 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the commercial and industrial area of the City which is generally bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the north, 4'h Street on the South, East Avenue on the east and Grove Avenue on the west. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal-Year 2012/13 Z o rn Z' m ' m c v =o c ~- ~ 00 U m ~ ZIy w s`/ U ~ ntlnaaaH~ ~ U ~ 3 ~ t ~ m N !' ~ _ ~ L ntl"1Stl3 II vro~ N ~ ~ 1 ¢ ~ ~/ ! Z Z u'S wa ny ~~~Ib bONbMll of .~LL ntl VONVMI `3 ~% r pueui3 ~ ++ ~ 1 3 '3: o H N /L~ ' ~~ N j ~, Od F y4 _ YO ~ r N ~ (// Q ~ N ti a ~ ~ •nd+~ o svi Z ntl a31S3H00a i:~' ~ ~ ,g v ~:~~ ncwwe.. ~ ~ ~ C fA ~ ~ _ a Z - 'O (ntl~N3NIllIW m •~ ~ _ > ro N II ~ ~ ~ _ a irr r.f Z a ~ w ~'a ~ - _ ~ - - t- N y C ~ J_ o - _ e0 ~ k r- S 3 N ntl-N3nti'N dam" _~ yNd i~ - n J t n .<uo,w~ o m ~xy.. w, vJ lQ . ~ d _3 ~ r w - _. ~ j Oltl9lH Fab emwawn ~ ~ u, ~' 1 -ntl 1S.\WT3Wtl - - .m = N ,^ U 2 v' H ntl udffiM'~." nd~xow \ ~. ~ „ r ~tl NVW-ll3H ^ n ~ _ rs r - t~" 11 1 - z m F F d weTeu!~ ~- ~ r m 1S ueMeu~ '- ~ ~.~1S~Nb'_I13N21V8 _ -_I~;. ~1 !j ~~ O m F ~ "~~• ~ ~ m 0 - - ~ ~ 5a39s`r , N - ~~ Q ~v`9e e R,g Yd ei j3 ~~ =_ -1S 3aIHddVS ~ ~~ ~~€.6 ~s=3 &~;5aa~ea€ ~I,)~ i 1 ~ l6r .--~ 5~j °r.4 ~e5iF, ~y L~.5~ YYY YS ~ 11~9~9 €p fi~y3a~'}@pS-~3~5" 50F~tla ag ~M s~e rc e~e`g ;a ~.5~§~a ~~2~z go ~-a yvE=~i~e ex U£ .9Z K~fy E~Ea YQ vy3. P600 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012113 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $22,090.00 Part-time Salaries 13,340.00 Fringe Benefits 12.300.00 Subtotal Personnel $47,730.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 6,940.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 400.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 80,660.00 Assessment Administration 5,530.00 General Overhead 2,960.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $96,640.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $144,370.00 Total Estimated Assessment $129,490.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (3.420.00) Total Estimated Revenue $126,070.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 18.300.00 Total Expenditure Budget $144,370.00 Total Estimated Assessment $129,494.47 Total District EDU Count 2,519.35 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $51.40 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $51.40 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P601 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based "on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $333,120.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (18,300.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2073 Reserve Fund Balance $314,820.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P602 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P603 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). " The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P604 • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1987, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P605 Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi tier Non Residential 1.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012113 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Rate Total Total er EDU er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Non Residential $51.40 $51.40 2,519.35 2,519.35 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012113 P606 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 co ~.. v ~- +r ~~ ,~ ~ ~ co ~ a ~ ~° ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ U ~ ® ~n ~ o V ~ ~ ice- ny ti~a4~ G) y . /~/ ,_.._.._.._.._ ~ J 1.r ~ o •V i y N C ~ ~ ~ m ~ o `a+ j N r 3 m o ~= ~ m ti Q G i ~ ®~ ^dise3 in `F+ ~ c .L i ny epuenn!13 ny epueM!33 .~ ~ J i yr i ~ ~g~aai~.(ea... y ny ~alsayooa ~- n ~a sa o0 v ~ y a ,~..~ i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._..:~ ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ~ '^ ~ -^^^- ny uaneH ny esow~aH , -^^^- ny esow~aH ny PIe4!4oEt/ ~~ -^^^- nV Pley!4oEd ny uewllaH ^ ~ ny uewllaH ~ L L ~ ny p e/Iau!n 3S ue!lawe~ gg gg ~~~~lEgYpeeP ~ nyana~ 9a~¢~fi~;~~~~ ~ c CD ~ (n ;+. E L p~~ ~3Y ~ d L.. O` W f!y T°~~ guff` ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~€~~4egai~~~F ~ c [D ~ gg+, m ++ i x i~~~~6~a~a ~ g~ +i,$gg=.i ~~ 9a~~YYBa 8•€ +es3 b' e~g E€do~gE ;3~e P608 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Assessment Non Residential $51.40 2,519.35 2,519.35 $129,494.47 TOTALS 2,519.35 2,519.35 $129,494.47 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Assessment Non Residential $51.40 2,519.35 2,519.35 $129,494.47 TOTALS 2,519.35 2,519.35 $129,494.47 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P609 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) P610 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P611 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 .Description of Improvements and Services ....................................:................:..........5 Map of Improvements .............................................................................:...................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General ...................................................................................:...................................9 Special Benefit .........................................:.................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P612 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012 the City Council of the City of Ranchd Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12 - 094, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012/13 Total Estimated Assessment $120,120.00 Less Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 4 980.00 Total Estimated Revenue $115,140.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 114 370.00 Total Expenditure Budget $229,510.00 Total District EDU Count 3,605.00 Actual Assessment per EDU $33.32 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $33.32 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special beneft conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P613 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. No. C053612 Exp.,&3a 1 3~ of Engineering Services, City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P614 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2012113 P615 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P616 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Highland Avenue on the south, Day Creek Channel on the west and City limits on the east and north. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 Z L N dyyo s~ ~ ~ r ~ m ~ m a ~` ~ c m o c w rr m ~ ~ m o m ,~ ~ U I~ m _ W ~ p >, ~ysYr ~ F ~ U nv~aa i ii Ii~gPlii!li~ i • o I ~ > I ++ a ~~ ~ n ~ Z Z ~ ~ is 0 }~ ~ i ' I ~ i .~ ~? L Q~ Q ~ I ~ Oa NOOllf19 NVWOaVM I i s a N ~ • a~ • ~ d ~ a~ ~ N V = I ~ ,^~ j ~ O r v' N I e ~~ ~ ~4 ~ S $3 .~ ` I M I ~a N > ' I Q Z _ 'a ~ N m nv 1SV3 0 ;~+ ~ ! 2 O L N i ~ -- _ ~_ ++ i J ~ I -- ~ N ~ J ~ O ~ ~ L . it o ~/ . ~ ~ nv VONVMIl3 ~.~ nNH~N j 113 } /~H,N I cy N L ~~ r .~ O ~ ~ t (n I • ~l. I .~ "~ - r . ~ ~ f ! ~ _ • ~. I Si ~ i ' ~~--1 ~ I ~ • f ~~ ~' -'~ ` . j Z . . a~d .... gea;pat5~~::g~ ~ .. o ~~ ~~5;¢Siig=E! a~' a+:= ~i-i U .zF P618 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2012113 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $22,090.00 Part-time Salaries 13,340.00 Fringe Benefits 12.300.00 Subtotal Personnel $47,730.00 Operations and Maintenance Training ~ $180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenarice 4,940.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities _ 153,160.00 Assessment Administration 19,830.00 General Overhead 3,640.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $181,780.00 Capital Expenditures Caoital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $229,510.00 Total Estimated Assessment $120,120.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 4 9( 80.00) Total Estimated Revenue $115,140.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 114.370.00 Total Expenditure Budget $229,510.00 Total Estimated Assessment $120,118.60 Total District EDU Count 3,605.00 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $33.32 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $33.32 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P619 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $66,520.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (114,370.00) Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance ($47,850.00) Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the.District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: GIS services for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals database. This is a combination of field and office work and is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessmerit Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P620 This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Interfund Allocation: This item is for night time field verification of street lights working and daytime matching of pole numbers against invoices received to ensure accurate billing. The budget is divided evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P621 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P622 • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1990, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P623 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EDU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 0.50 Unil Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Single Family Residential $33.32 $33.32 3,605.00 3,605.00 Multi-family Residential 33.32 33.32 0.00 0.00 Non Residential 33.32 33.32 0.00 0.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P624 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 w ~~ V 'i +Irw w/ ~ J ~ ~ O ¢ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ U (D v~ . o ~ ~ ~ - ny ti~ay~ y: _ ~ J ti r o /~ / •V N N C_ _ /~~ W J m ~ o ~F.i = w m r ° 3 0 ~ o w Q _.._.._.. _. _.._.._ i ny lse3 in ~ ^ ® ~ 1 L _ _.._.._ . n e uenn '~ ; y p g3 i J y.. ~ i y ny ~alsayooa ~ i n La sa o0 ; d i 4 a ; ,~.. ; i i ny ua~!II!W r._.._.._.._.._ _ i ny ua~!II!W i i i i ny uaneH ~ ~ i .__ int/ uaneH i i ny esow~aH j _ ! nt/ esow~aH i ~ nH Pleq!4o~`d i inb' PIe9!4o~V i ny uewllaH i j i ~-~" ~ ny uewllaH ° ~l L L v ny p e~(au!n 3S ue!lawe~ ~ - i m LL e ~ ~B iE ~ C ~ gg L~~~ E~@fS y~ ~ y N m i ~S p ~~ g P§`3~2~8 ~ ~ VO i~~ ts~43 Ee le la~~da=;agp5 6ea2=cag8ti H~ ~ 8 Z ci @a 2 FL P626 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $33.32 3,605.00 3,605.00 $120,118.60 Multi-family Residential 33.32 D.00 0.00 0.00 Non Residential 33.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS ~ 3,605.00 3,605.00 $120,118.60 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $33.32 3,605.00 3,605.00 $120,118.60 Multi-family Residential 33.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Non Residential 33.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 3,605.00 3,605.00 $120,118.60 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2012113 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Annexation Total Total Property Type Parcel Number Date Pro'ect UnitslAcres EBUs Count Use Code 0225-191-12 03/02/2011 TR 17651 56 SFD 56.00 Single-Family Residential 0226-102-02 03/02/11 TR 18708 7 SFD 7.00 Single-Family Residential 0225-161-65 and 07/06/11 TR 18032 23 SFD 23.00 Single-Family Residential 0225-161-71 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P627 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P628 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member . Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P629 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Seivices ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General ............................................................................. ..........................................9 Special Benefit ................................................................. ..........................................9 General Benefit ................................................................ ........................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P630 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City'), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12 094, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012/13 Total Estimated Assessment $131,590.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 29 130.00 Total Estimated Revenue $160,720.00 Plus Reserve Fund Collection 43 420.00 Total Expenditure Budget $117,300.00 Total District EDU Count 2,150.56 Actual Assessment per EDU $61.19 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $61.19 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P631 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. ~ROtraslpN ~DREWS~,GFyG3 Fy Ntl. C053672 ?' 9 Mark Steuer, erector of Engineering Se ices, City Engineer Ezp.°5.30•,1 3 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P632 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must'be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P633 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the'close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P634 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as South Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Etiwanda Avenue on the west, Highland Avenue on the north and Foothill Boulevard on the south. The southern portion of the District is bounded by East Avenue on the east and the northern portion of the District is bounded by the 15 Freeway on the east. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 Street Lights and Traffic Signals Improvements IMNDftONS PPRK LINE IRIA MRORS PARK ST h The maps, date and geographic information ("Information') available by end through tlm Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga are prexmed as a public resource of general information. The Ciry o(Rancho Cucamonga makes nor implies no enanry, represemation or guarontee as to the convent, sequence, attumcy completeness or timeliness of any Information provided to you herein. The user should not rely upon the Information for any reason and is directed to independently verify any and ell Information preserved herein. The Ciry o(Rencho Cucamonga explicitly and wilho W limitation disclaims any and all representations and wzrantces, including. but not limited m, the implied waranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall neither accept nor assume any liability, regardless of the causation for (I) any ertors, omissions or inacnimcies in any infonnetion provided and/or (ii) any action or inaction ocnirting due to any persons reliance upon the Information available herein. GARCIA PARK • SCE Streetlights o Traffic Signal Lights BL Q SLD8 Boundary 0 0.25 0.5 1 Mile City Boundary P636 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012/13 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $20,710.00 Part-time Salaries 13,340.00 Fringe Benefits 11.650.00 Subtotal Personnel $45,700.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 4,940.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 14,670.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 53,860.00 Assessment Administration 9,390.00 General Overhead 3,200.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $71,600.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $117,300.00 Total Estimated Assessment $131,590.00 Plus Estimated Prior Year Delinquencies & Interest 29.130.00 Total Estimated Revenue $160,720.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (43 420.00) Total Expenditure Budget $117,300.00 Total Estimated Assessment ~ $131,592.77 Total District EDU Count 2150.56 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $61.19 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $61.19 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P637 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $2,379,480.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 43.420.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $2,422,900.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P638 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P639 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots orparcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P640 • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1990, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012113 P641 Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential ~ 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 0.50 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Single Family Residential $193.75 $61.19 1 „047.00 1,047.00 Multi-family Residential 193.75 61.19 1,057.00 1,057.00 Non Residential ~ 193.75 61.19 23.28 46.56 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P642 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 w ~ ~, V •~ w y ;_ ~ a ' ~° ~ ~ o ~ 1 \_ ~ ~ ny ~(JJa4~ f U C 07 y . ~ o i (~ - r J 1 ; .._.._.._.._ ~ . o i N N I C m 2 0 ~ j w ~ m r 0 3 0 ~~ I 1 - Li Q i _.._ _.._.. i n`d lse3 in i ® i L `~a1 ~ = i ny epueM!33 -"-"- " ~ ny epueM!33 ~~ i i J ! ; - . ~ ~ ~8 ~aaJ~ .(ea ny Jalsayooa j- y ,. n Ja sa o0 ; d 3 y a •~..~ - i i j ny ua~!II!W ~._.._.._.._.._.._ j ny ua~!II!W i i j i i . i i n uane i y H i my uaneH i j nyesowJaH j ~(- !nyesowJaH i I n y Pleq!yoJy ~ - jny Pley!4oJb' i ny uewllaH i ~•r •• N ~ ny uewllaH 1 ~ /• L L ~ ny pJe~(au !n iS ue!lawe~ j -- i j ....._;t i g del=~_~:s . Eglr ~ 1 _ • 3 - . s ~ _ 3 ~ nE. Ez nEx i ~ O ` fr ~d ~ -~ (n ~ m li Q gYc4 ieil'~ E:Pg Bg ~ x18 PE °~ ~ T Ea, B ~~~Pli ~j N N m :~ j~ ~$;65 fip~o'tdi•~ ~ ~a ~ 9~~ ~ gE ~ EE E9~° t~~pea~i ~° Ea~§3ea e;0j;• ~< c~S U nsn a5a9;$SL d3a $-~°€z~g d ~ E ~ a e £d n2fe P644 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012113 maximum and .actual assessments for the District: Property Type Count Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $193.75 ~ 1,047.00 1,047.00 $202,856.25 Multi-family Residential 193.75 1057.00 1057.00 204,793.75 Non Residential 193.75 23.28 46.56 9,021.00 TOTALS 2,127.27 2.150.56 $416,671.00 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $61.19 1,047.00 1,047.00 $64,065.93 Multi-family Residential 61.19 1057.00 1057.00 64,677.83 Non Residential 61.19 23.28 46.56 2,849.01 TOTALS 2,127.27 2.150.56 $131,592.77 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexation is effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Annexation Total Total Property Type Parcel Number Date Pro'ect UnitslAcres EBUs Count Use Code 0227-131-03, 08 01/18/12 TR 18806 33 SFD 33.00 Single-Family Residential AND 0227-131-62 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTR~ITIVE SERVICES DEPAR'T'MENT P645 Date: July 18, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS, AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagrams and Assessments, approve the Annual Engineer's Reports, and order the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10. The Engineer's Reports are also on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance (LMD) No's. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts"). This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports for the Districts, identifies proposed Fiscal Year 2012/2013 assessment rates. The Engineer's Reports identify the required budget for each of the Districts, including the surplus, if any, remaining in the fund balance for each District. All assessment rates remain unchanged for FY 12/13, with the exception of LMD 6-R, in which rates will increase by 2.09% as further discussed below. The Fiscal Year 2012/2013 budget and assessment rate for each District is as follows: LMD 1 Budgeted Expenses $1,449,110 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies -$1,163,640 Deficit from operating reserves $ 285,470 P646 CONSIDEIi!\"PION TO APPROVI3'1'IiH RI3SOI.UTION FOR Lr\NDSC!\P13 Is'fr\IN'I'13Nr\NCP DIS'1'RIC"1' NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 nND 10. JULY 18, 2072 Pr\GI3 2 The assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parks and parkways throughout the City. The current assessment rate is $92.21 per single-family residence, and the multi-family rate is $46.11 per dwelling unit. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $327,420.00. At the current level of expenditures it will likely be necessary to conduct a Prop 218 ballot process in FY 12/13 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. This matter will be brought to the City Council for discussion in the near future. LMD 2 Budgeted Expenses $3,102,300 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $2.880.640 Deficit from operating reserves $ 221,660 The assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos, median islands, trails and parks within the Victoria Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $422.00 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $844.00 per acre, and the vacant rate is $105.50 per acre. The City Council had a workshop on July 12 to discuss options for addressing the structural budget deficit in LMD 2. LMD 3A Budgeted Expenses $8,030 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $4.350 Deficit from operating reserves $3,680 The assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways on Hyssop Drive. The current assessment rate is $413.74 per acre for commercial property. LMD 3B Budgeted Expenses $1,336,830 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $ 944,290 Deficit from operating reserves $ 392,540 The assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $352.80 per acre for commercial property. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $449,640. At the current level of expenditures it will likely be necessary to consider a Prop 218 ballot process in FY 12/13, or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. P647 CONSIDFRA"1'ION'1'O APPROVr_i'I'HIL RESOL,U'1'ION FOR LANDSCAPE MAIN'PENANCI: DISTI2I(:"1' NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, G-R, 7, 8, 9 ANV 10. JULY 18, 2012 PACE 3 LMD 4-R Budgeted Expenses $2,962,500 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $2,552,050 Contribution from operating reserves $ 440,450 The assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos and parks within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $380.00 per single-family residence, the condominium rate is $304.00 per dwelling unit, and the multi-family rate is $266.00 per dwelling unit. The commercial rate is $1,235.00 per acre, and the vacant rate is $95.00 per acre. Please note that while for this year expenses exceed revenues, LMD 4-R actually has a balanced operating budget. For FY 12/13, expenditures are anticipated to exceed revenues due to the use of reserves for one-time capital investments in the LMD area, including concrete repairs, paseo lighting retrofits, ADA improvements, and other improvements. LMD 5 Budgeted Expenses $14,320 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - 6 070 Deficit from operating reserves $ 8,250 The assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of a Tot Lot located on the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. The current assessment rate is $113:29 per single-family residence. LMD 6-R Budgeted Expenses $448,860 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - 42$ 0,890 Deficit from operating reserves $ 27,970 The assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos, trees and trails within the Caryn Planned Community. The rate for Fiscal Year 2012/13 will increase from $366.00 to $373.66 per single-family residence in Zone 1 and from $274.50 to $280.25 per single family residence in Zone 2, a CPI increase of 2.09% as compared to Fiscal Year 2011/12. LMD 7 Budgeted Expenses $1,017,000 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $ 842.820 Deficit from operating reserves $ 174,180 This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $662,540.00. At the current level of expenditures it will likely be necessary to conduct a Prop 218 ballot process in FY 13/14, or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. P648 CON$IUI'sRA1'ION'1'O AI'I'ROVG "I'I'Ir? RI:',SOLU9'ION I+OR LANDSCAI'I:', IVGllNTGNANCI~. DIST'RICT' NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. JULY 18, 2012 PAG 13 4 The assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and paseos within the North Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $307.05 per single-family residence. LMD 8 Budgeted Expenses $30,080 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - 2$ 8.420 Deficit from operating reserves $ 1,660 The assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $151.45 per single-family residence. LMD 9 Budgeted Expenses $721,770 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - 16 450 From operating reserves for additional work $305,320 The assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in Lower Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $187.00 per single-family residence. LMD 10 Budgeted Expenses $621,100 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - 461 740 Deficit from operating reserves $159,360 The assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in Rancho Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $616.20 per single-family residence and $1,232.40 per acre for commercial property. Attachments ~ 1. Resolution 2. Engineer's Reports P649 RESOLUTION NO. 12-127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS. AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 38, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 20th day of June, 2012, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 12-097 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R and 7 through 10, inclusive (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law'); and WHEREAS, subsequent to the preliminary approval of the Annual Engineer's Reports, the Assessment Engineer revised each of the Annual Engineer's Reports (each a "Revised Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Revised Annual Engineer's Reports") to add to such reports information regarding the annexations, if any, to each applicable District during Fiscal Year 2011-2012 and to make certain other insubstantial formatting revisions to the summary of assessments and the District budgets that did not result in an increase of the expenditure budget for the Districts, or any one of them, or the aggregate assessments or any individual assessment proposed to be levied within the Districts, or any one, of them; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom, and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga. as follows: P650 SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. Notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and b. The annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 proposed to be levied within each District as set- forth in the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District, and therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Report for each of the Districts, is hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the Districts in the amounts as set forth in the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention. be done and made. SECTION 4. The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2012. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2012 and ending June 30, 2013. P651 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2012. Executed this at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P652 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) P653 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2744 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P654 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ...............................................................................................16 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 17 District Budget ..........................................................................................................17 Definitions of Budget Items ..:....................................................................................18 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 20 General ..................................................................................................................... 20 General Benefit ........................................................................................................20 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................21 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................21 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 23 24 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................24 Annexations .............................................................................................................. 24 P655 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012, the City Couhcil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12 - 097, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and - WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineers Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012/13 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,690.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies' (26.050.00) Total Estimated Revenue $1,163,640.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 285.470.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,449,110.00 Total District EBU Count 12,901.46 Actual Assessment per EBU 592.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $92.21 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P656 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. No. C063672 ~' ~~ Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Ezp.6.3o- 1 3 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P657 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the Levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P658 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P659 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the bouhdaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City which is not located within the City's planned development communities. The District is made up of various landscaped sites throughout the City. As such, the parcels within the District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other LMDs within the City. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turt. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Parks, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, Lions Park, and Napa Park Site # Descriptive Location A-1 The north and south side of Wilson from Hellman to Amethyst. Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet Hardscape area: 5,694 square feet A-2 The east side of Hellman from 326 feet south of Pepperidge to 73 feet north of Pepperidge. Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet A-3 The south side of 19th Street from 62 feet east of Mayberry to 173 feet east of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet Hardscape area: 440 square feet A-4 The south side of Wilson from Amethyst to Archibald; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald from Wilson to 105 feet south of Cottonwood. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P660 Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Court from Klusman to Diamond Ave Ground Cover area. Hardscape area: A-6 The parkway on the Ridge. Ground Cover area. Hardscape area: 3,143 square feet 1,864 square feet riorth side of Wilson from 348 feet east of Morning Canyori to Alder 5,700 square feet 4,760 square feet A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata. Ground Cover area: 911 square feet A-8 The east side of Broken Star from 80' south of Highland to Highland; the north side of Highland from Amethyst to Broken Star including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland from Broken Star to Amethyst; the west side of Amethyst from 140 feet south of Highland to 265 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 6,545 square feet Hardscape area: 2,554 square feet Mulchscape area: 14,005 square feet A-9 The south side of Highland from Hellman to Broken Star. Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet A-10 The south side of 19th from 170 feet west of Pilgrim to 167 feet east of Pilgrim. Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet Hardscape area: 1,084 square feet A-11 The east side of Amethyst from Lemon to 230 feet north of Apricot Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet Hardscape area: 3,438 square feet A-12 The west side of Sapphire from 710 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet A-13 The south side of Victoria from 110 feet west of London to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet Hardscape area: 3,480 square feet A-14 The west side of Archibald from 273 feet north of La Gloria to Lemon; the-La Gloria median from Archibald to Jadeite; the north and south side of La Gloria from Archibald to 53 feet east of Jadeite; the north side of Lemon from Archibald to 55 feet east of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet Hardscape area: 12,030 square feet A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald from 610 feet south of Cottonwood to Wilson; the south side of Wilson from Archibald to Alta Loma Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald from Banyan to 190 feet north of Sunflower. Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P661 A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald from 225 feet south of Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan from Jadeite to 410 feet west of Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 216 square feet A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst from 192 feet south of Sunflower to Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet A-20 The west side of Archibald from 210 feet north of La Colina to 230 feet south of Almond; the south side of La Colina from Archibald to Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood to Raspberry north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College. Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet A-22 The west side of Haven from Carrari to Vista Grove. Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet A-23 The west side of Haven from 434 feet north of Manzanita to 258 feet south of Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 48,390 square feet Turf area: 5,868 square feet Hardscape area: 4,581 square feet A-24 The south side of 19th from 286 feet east of Amethyst to 166 feet west of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet Hardscape area: 2,938 square feet A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest to Sun Valley. Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet A-26 The west side of Haven from 630 feet north of Wilson to Wilson; the parkway on the north side of Wilson from Haven to Mayberry; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry from Wilson to 382 feet north of Poplar, and the east and west side of Cartilla from Wilson to Poplar. Ground Cover area: 10,243 square feet Mulchscape area: 25,297 square feet A-27 The north side of 19th from Mayberry to 93 feet east of Castle Gate. Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet Hardscape area: 2,870 square feet A-28 The east side of Hermosa from 360 feet south of Manzanita to Manzanita, and the south side of Manzanita from Hermosa to Raspberry. Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet Hardscape area: 4,712 square feet A-29 The south side of Wilson from 240 feet west of Timbermist to Hermosa; the west side of Hermosa from Wilson to 213 feet south of Oak Grove. Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P662 A-30 The equestrian trail and plant material from the curb to the tract wall on the west side of Hermosa from 118 feet south of Hillside to 160 feet south of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet A-31 The south side of Lemon from London to Calle Hermosa Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet A-32 The north side of Lemo n from the.Alta Loma Channel to London; the east side of London from Lemon to Cypress. Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet Hardscape area: 3,375 square feet A-33 The parkway on the east side of London from 158 feet north of Banyan to 310 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet Hardscape area: 1,160 square feet A-34 The south side of Alta Loma from Mayberry to Revere. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet Note: 1,512 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site on 7-00. A-35 The west side of Hermosa from Lemon to 125 feet north of Highland, the parkway on the south side of Lemon from 621 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet Hardscape area: 9,207 square feet Mulchscape area: 2,370 square feet A-36 The south side of Lemon from 365 feet west of Mayberry to Cartilla. Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet Hardscape area: 4,915 square feet A-37 The south side of Hillside north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl to 203 feet east of Eastwood. Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista Ground Cover area: 500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,380 square feet A-39 The south side of Almond from Henry to Sapphire; the west side of Sapphire from Almond to 255 feet south of Bella Vista. Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland; the parkway on the south side of Highland from Jasper to Carnelian; the west side of Carnelian from Highland to 210 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet Hardscape area: 6,040 square feet A-41 The west side of Sapphire from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,784 square feet Hardscape area: 812 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P663 A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 132 feet north of Sunflower to 23 feet north of Sunflower; and from Sunflower to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet Hardscape area: 5,772 square feet - . . A-43 The north side of Base Line from Topaz to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet Hardscape area: 1,890 square feet A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire from Banyan to Marble. Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 9-8-99. A-46 The south side of Banyan from North star to Zircon. Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet Hardscape area: 7,890 square feet A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan from 180 feet east of Zircon to 186 feet west of Vineyard. Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 452 feet north of Cielito; 158 feet south of Cielito and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito from Cielito to 170 feet south of Cielito. Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet Hardscape area: 2,440 square feet A-49 The east side of Carnelian from 662 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Carnelian to Northstar. Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet Hardscape area: 6,972 square feet A-50 The north side of Almond from Sapphire to Crest View; the east and west side of Skyline from Almond to 595 feet north of Almond. Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet Hardscape area: 8,680 square feet A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven to Riverwood, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven from 400 feet north of Amber to 270 feet south of Amber. Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet Hardscape area: 5,458 square feet A-52 The east side of Riverwood, from 188 feet south of Chanvood to 193 feet north of Charwood. Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-53 The west side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The south side of Highland from Jasper to 308 feet west of Sard. The east and westside of Sard from Highland to Hunter. Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet Hardscape area: 4,740 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P664 A-54 The west side of Beryl from 233 feet north of Mignonette to Mignonette Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape area: 932 square feet A-55 The north side of 19'" from Cartilla to Mayberry. The east side of Mayberry from 19'" to Heather. Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet Hardscape area: 5,060 square feet A-56 The east side of Beryl from 410 feet north of Wilson to Wilson The north side of Wilson from Beryl to 731 feet west of Buckthorn. The south side of Wilson from Buckthorn to Beryl. Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet Hardscape area: 5,436 square feet A-57 The east side of Hermosa From 115 north of Coca To 451 feet north of Coca. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa to 619 feet east of Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet Hardscape area: 6,794 square feet A-58 The west side of Haven from 510 feet south of Victoria to 1005 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet Hardscape area: 4,790 square feet A-59 The east side of Archibald from 820 feet south of Lemon to 448 feet south of Lemon and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon to 185 feet south of Lemon. Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet Hardscape area: 5,041 square feet A-60 The south side of Lemon from 290 feet east of Archibald to London. The West side of London from Lemon to Orange. Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet Hardscape area: 4,122 square feet A-61 The north side of Carrari from Archibald to London. Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-62 The east side of Archibald from Carrari to 505 feet north of Meadowood. Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet Hardscape area: 1,824 square feet A-63 The south side of Almond street from Carriage to Almond Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet A-64 The east side of Beryl from Cottonwood to Wilson. The south side of Wilson from Beryl to 437 feet east of Beryl. The north side of Wilson from Cousins to 474 feet east of Cousins. Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet Hardscape area: 9,949 square feet A-65 The east side of Archibald from LaGloria to 328 feet north of LaGloria. Ground Cover area: 2,279 square feet Hardscape area: 2,411 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012113 P665 A-66 The east side of Hermosa from Waterford to 500 feet north of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 4,695 square feet Hardscape area: 5,947 square feet A-67 The south side of 19`" from 220 feet east of Sapphire to Via Serena. Ground Cover area: 3,208 Square feet Hardscape area: 4,158 square feet A-68 The west side of Haven from Hillside to 783 feet south of Hillside. Ground cover area: 3,492 square feet A-69 The north side of Hillside from 27 feet west of Mayberry to 191 feet west of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,002 square feet Hardscape area: 1,605 square feet A-70 The south side of 19`" from 365 feet west of Amethyst to Amethyst. The west side of Amethyst from 19`" to Hedges. Ground Cover area: 6,435 square feet Hardscape area: 7,015 square feet A-71 The west side of Archibald from Hillside to Wilson Avenue. The north side of Wilson, south of the trail fence area from Archibald to 467 feet west of Archibald. Ground Cover area: 9,265 square feet Hardscape area: 2,609 square feet A-72 The south side of Banyan from 420 feet west of Archibald to Archibald. The west side of Archibald from Banyan to 389 feet south of Banyan. Ground cover area: 10,270 square feet Hardscape area: 6,673 square feet A-73 The west side of Beryl from 300 feet north of San Simeon Drive to 130 feet north of San Simeon Drive. Ground Cover area: 1,200 square feet Hardscape area: 600 square feet A-74 The south side of Highland Ave. from Beryl St. to Hellman Ave. Ground cover area: 11,603 square feet A-75 The south side of Highland Ave. from Amethyst St. to 612 feet east of Archibald Ave. Ground cover area: 106,409 square feet Hardscape area: 60,608 square feet A-76 The west side of Archibald from 635 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. The north side of Hillside from Archibald to 770 feet west of Archibald. Ground cover area: 8,859 square feet Hardscape area: 1,389 square feet A-77 The east side of Carnelian from Brilliant Ln. to Wilson including the irrigation cut-outs along trail. The south side of Wilson from Carnelian to 745 feet east of Arabian Dr. The irrigation cut-outs on the north side of Wilson from Carnelian to 775 feet east of Arabian Dr. Ground cover area: 5,101 square feet Hardscape area: 11,322 square feet B-1 The median on Blue Gum from Etiwanda to Blue Gum Court. Ground Cover area: 5,100 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P666 B-2 The north side of 19th from Highland to Palm; the west and east side of Alameda from 19th to Ring; the east side of Palm from 19th to Ring. Ground Cover area: 47,397 square feet Hardscape area: 26,285 square feet B-3 The paseo from Sutter Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 294 square feet Hardscape area: 400 square feet B-4 The north side of Banyan from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg. Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet Hardscape area: 3,834 square feet B-5 The north side of Lemon from Semillion to 188 feet west of Terracing. Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet Hardscape area: 3,894 square feet B-6 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to Semillion. Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet Hardscape area: 3,780 square feet B-7 The south side of Banyan from Cabernet to 414 feet east of Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet B-8 The south side of Banyan from Callaway to Muscat. Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet B-9 The east side of Haven from Banyan to 240 feet north of Banyan; the north side of Banyan from Haven to Merlot. Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet Hardscape area: 1,356 square feet B-10 The east side of Haven from 400 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Haven to Callaway. Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,348 square feet B-11 The south side of Banyan from Muscat to Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet B-12 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to 135 feet east of Valinda. Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet Hardscape area: 4,098 square feet B-13 The south side of 19th from Inyo to 585 feet east of San Benito; the parkways on the east and west side of San Benito from 19th to San Mateo; the east side of Inyo from 19th to paseo south of 19th and the paseo running east from Inyo to Sonora. Ground Cover area: 17,563 square feet Turf area: 3,387 square feet Hardscape area: 14,192 square feet B-14 The paseo from San Benito and Sonora to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet Hardscape area: 540 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P667 B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus and Lavine to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet Hardscape area: 428 square feet B-16 The paseo from Inyo to Mendocino. Ground Cover area: 225 square feet Hardscape area: 184 square feet B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 918 square feet Hardscape area: 420 square feet B-18 The south side of Wilson from 377 feet west of Canistel to 1032 feet east of Canistel. Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet Hardscape area: 8,454 square feet B-19 The east side of Haven from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet Hardscape area: 8,865 square feet B-20 The east side of Haven from 341 feet south of Victoria to Victoria; the south side of Victoria from Haven to 237 feet east of Mango. Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet Hardscape area: 8,767 square feet B-21 The south side of 19th from Valinda to Inyo. Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet Hardscape area: 3,700 square feet B-22 The south side of Lemon south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 284 feet north of Marbella. The parkway on the south side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 517 feet north of Marbella. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de- sac on Sonterra Court. The parkway on the north side Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 526 feet south of Terracina. The northside of Lemon north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 562 feet south of Terracina. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena Street. Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet Turf Area: 6,390 square feet Hardscape area: 4,928 square feet B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon from 129 feet south of Marbella to 526 feet south of Terracina. The slope On the east side of Lemon east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella to 562 feet south of Terracina. The west side of Lemon west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. The parkway on the west side of Lemon from 517 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet Hardscape area: 4,468 square feet Note _There was 11,844 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site 7-1-00. B-24 The south side of Highland from 327 feet west Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,946 square.feet Hardscape area: 2,099 square feet B-25 The south side of Banyan from 152 feet west of Cantabria to 930 feet east of Cantabria. Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P668''` B-26 The north side of Wilson from 590 feet west of High Meadow Place to 187 feet east of High Meadow Place. Ground Cover area: 4,628 Square feet Hardscape area: 390 square feet B-27 The east side of Haven from 467 feet north of 19th St. to 650 feet north of 19th St. Ground cover area: 3,483 square feet Hardscape area: 6,235 square feet C-1 The north side of 26th from Andover to Hermosa; the east side of Hermosa from 26th to 331 feet north of Concord. Ground Cover area: 12,804 square feet Turf area: 9,423 square feet Hardscape area: 5,532 square feet C-2 The entry monument on the north east and northwest corners of 4th and Archibald Ground Cover area Turt area: Hardscape area: C-3 The south side of B Ground Cover area Hardscape area: 5,860 square feet 5,546 square feet 1,842 square feet 3se Line from Ramona to 128 feet east of Cambridge 17,262 square feet 4,865 square feet C-4 The south side of Base Line from 440 feet west of Ramona to Ramona Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet Hardscape area: 2,200 square feet C-5 The south side of Base Line from 340 feet west of Center to 103 feet east of Center. Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet Hardscape area: 2,215 square feet C-G The south side of Base Line from Ivy to 105 feet west of Marine. Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet Hardscape area: 2,475 square feet C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church from 142 feet east of Teak to 230 feet west of Teak. Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet Hardscape area: 1,650 square feet C-8 The west side of Hermosa from 524 feet north of Palo Alto to 142 feet south of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet Hardscape area: 3,996 square feet C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa from 163 feet north of Ironwood to 145 feet south of Ironwood. Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,848 square feet C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta. Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet Hardscape area: 4,380 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P669 C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl from Alder to 135 feet north of Culpepper. Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman from Tryon to 665 feet north of Tryon. Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman from 500 feet north of Church to Church. Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet Hardscape area: 3,000 square feet C-14 The east side of Archibald from 196 feet north of Palo Alto to 530 feet north of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet Hardscape area: 1,374 square feet C-15 The north side of San Bernardino from Summerlin to 225' west of Summerlin. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet Hardscape area: 710 square feet C-16 The south side of Base Line from 286 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. The raised planter on the southwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,190 square feet Hardscape area: 2,320 square feet C-17 The east side of Hellman from 775 feet south of 6th St. to 6th St. The south side of 6th St. from Hellman to Golden Oak Rd. The west side of Golden Oak Rd. from 6th St. to Foxbrook Dr. Ground cover area: 9,058 square feet Hardscape area: 6,387 square feet D-1 The east side of Rochester from Church to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,126 square feet Turt area: 16,794 square feet Hardscape area: 17,301 square feet D-2 The east side of Rochester from 146 feet south of Chervil to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,908 square feet Turt area: 9,950 square feet Hardscape area: 13,263 square feet D-3 The south side of Baseline from Rochester to 600 feet east of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 2,180 square feet Hardscape area: 4,121 square feet D-4 The north and south sides of Church St. from Rochester to 150 feet east of Hyssop Dr. Ground Cover area: 6,340 square feet Hardscape area: 8,887 square feet H-9 The Haven median from the 210 freeway to Alta Loma Drive. Ground cover area: 2,207 square feet H-10 The Haven median from entrance of Haven Village to Amber Lane. Ground Cover area: 4,402 square feet Turt area: 2,566 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P670 The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 8,804 and the Turf improvement square footage is 5,131; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by the General Fund. H-11 The Haven median from Amber Lane to Olive Street. Ground Cover area: 3,289 square feet Turt area: 1,738 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 6,577 and the Turf improvement square footage is 3,475; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by the General Fund. H-12 The Haven median from Olive Street to 712 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 4,767 square feet Turf area: 9,950 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 9,534 and the Turt improvement square footage is 3,933; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by the General Fund. H-13 The Haven median from 19`" Street to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 12,514 square feet FH-18 The Foothill median from East Avenue to 453 feet east of Cornwall Avenue. Ground Cover area: _5,450 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turt areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P671 i=Q s`>~~. N r O Z ntl epuemp3 *~ V ~ L i+ _~ Q V ~ ~ w, W 0 .~..~~ ~ ~ L ntl uaneH R N a a ny esouuaH ~e~ ~ a ~ uQ Q ntl{h eQlllwtl J "<- ntl uewllaH IS uepawep • 0 m m '9 B a n o..~Q o. °I.a~-o ' r a ~ ~ Z Q ~ W d J ~ W W ~ p Z ~ ~ ~ J ~ } W ~ ~ a m ~ ~ C l Y ~ O W F- ~ ~ ^ ~ W ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ "1 i i o ^~ ~ , i i i ~ ~..~ Ise3 SL-I uaneH Q Q Q ~ .p V xz U~ Z ~ 6 a~ v My aNT OJ ' sU ~U U U N r. U~_ .Q N~ ° ~~~ K 0 a 0 Ptl uewllaH N pie (aui~ - e~=>Eo -° _ FE4.eA =° E:E. ~~pvo~ of CeE °c m~cc mm _ o ``m 3oa ~'~~ ~4Em cL3mEeYm _ °En- 8°c aE rcnae~_`._ a• ^~usE ~~c~ a;ate v_ prm m'a cEp rnni3v_cs V~-a o~n~mo P672 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012/13 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $146,770.00 Part-time Salaries 22,400.00 Fringe Benefits 71 770.00 Subtotal Personnel $240,940.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $68,850.00 O 8 M Facilities 6,500.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 2,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 3,800.00 Depreciation of Computer Equipment 0.00 Contract Services 554,030.00 Contract Services/Facilities 5,000.00 Tree Maintenance 63,260.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 3,800.00 Water Utilities 303,540.00 Electric Utilities 65,330.00 Assessment Administration 65,020.00 General Overhead 67.040.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $1,206,170.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlav -Vehicles $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,449,110.00 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,690.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (26.050.00) Total Estimated Revenue $1,163,640.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 285.470.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,449,110.00 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,693.34 Total District EBU Count 12,901.46 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $92.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $92.21 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P673 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior tc December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $612,890.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (285,470.00) Ooeratina Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $327,420.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P674 services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer s report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooerating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P675 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P676 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights- of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1979, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P677 method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Dwelling Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number andlor new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $92.21 $92.21 7,824.00 7,824.00 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 92.21 10,125.00 5,062.50 Non-Residential 92.21 92.21 6.98 13.96 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs far maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P678 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2012/13 *.. ~ ~, v ~~ N .~ "1r r J Q c 1 ~ U ~ ® v] C ~ ~ ~ i~_ ny ~(JJa4~ O3 4 _ ; .._.._.._.._ ~ J y r ~ o. ~ ~ i N N C ~ ~ ~ m ~ o 10 o a ~C j m i° Q i ~ ® nb' lse3 vJ ~ ~ v a i ny epuennp3 ny epuenn!33 ~ i V ~ i a ~g ~aaJ~ ~(ea J ny Jalsayooa . ~ ny Jalsayooa ~..~ i ny ua~l!II!W f._.._.._.._.._ :~ ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ' ~ - ^- ny uaneH ny esowlaH ny esowlaH nb' PIe9!4aJt/ nV PIe4!4~1`d ny uewllaH ^~~ N ny uewllaH ~ L t ~ ny p e~auln iS uellawe~ ~~y§~iEY~PF~~ v Yes-. ~ rp ~s~p C'~1 ~ A`~/ aA01~ sa°{a§fiaEYs~°z ~ _ ~:~ka Ea~gg¢¢ C m ~ ~ a s a z".t L J _ 3 t ~i C~E~~sao @ $, ~ N O O` ~ ~EZq~$' g,Y fi' 17 (n N O Q f9yt eY~g a~~~ 1€~4~sY~~~~`~ N (0 X~i 8i~'~Y~ z~ m 6 az~#;ii63e 3 Y9"z.i auYY=a3 Aso a~~€T ~s~,r9' ~='z U eaoYysa°p$pi;~p E~3s9"'FFa @ ~zBsfiYd BaP ie P680 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012113 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $92.21 7,824.00 7,824.00 $721,451.04 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 10,127.00 5,063.50 466,955.97 Non-ResidentialNacant 92.21 6.98 13.96 1,286.33 TOTALS 17,957.98 12,901.46 $1,169,693.34 Property Type (County Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $92.21 7,824.00 7,824.00 $721,451.04 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 10,127.00 5,063.50 466,955.97 Non-ResidentialNarant 92.21 6.98 13.96 1,286.33 TOTALS 17,957.98 12,901.46 $1,189,693.34 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexation is effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Annexation Total Total Property Type Parcel Date Project Units/Acres EBUs (County Use Code) Number 0207-022-56 03/07/12 DRC2011- 1 SFD 1.00 Single-Family Residential 00645 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P681 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) P682 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GISISpecial Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P683 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ...............................................................................................17 ESTIMATE OF COSTS District Budget .............................................. Definitions of Budget Items ........................... METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 18 ...........................................................18 ...........................................................19 21 Genera I .....................................................................................................................21 General Benefit ........................................................................................................21 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................22 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................22 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 24 25 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................25 Annexations .............................................................................................................. 25 P684 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12- 097, aResolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and -NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012/13 Total Estimated Assessment $2,973,060.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 92 420.00 Total Estimated Revenue $2,880,840.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 221,660.00 Total Expenditure Budget $3,102,300.00 Total District EBU Count 7045.17' Actual Assessment per EBU $422.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $422.00 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P685 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P686 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P687 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P688 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the I-210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Avenue, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway and east of Haven Avenue, also known as the Victoria Planned Community, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, community trails and parks within the Victoria Planned Community and as such are of direct and special benefit to the parcels within that community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turt. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cast effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Kenyon Park, Windrows Park, Ellena Park, Vintage Park, Victoria Groves Park and Victoria Arbors Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriotive Location 2-1 The west side of Arbor Lane from the traffic circle to Church. The Arbor Lane median from Church to the traffic circle. The east side of Arbor Lane from Long Meadow to Church. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Day Creek Blvd. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Saintsbury. The north side of Winery Drive from Arbor Lane to 214 feet west of Arbor Lane. The south side of Long Meadow Drive from Freestone Court to Duck Creek Place. Ground cover area: 93,639 square feet Hardscape: 59,041 square feet 2-2 The northwest corner of Day Creek Blvd. and Church. The north side of Church from Day Creek Blvd. to 1,152 feet west of Hess. The paseo from the north side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The paseo from the north side of Church to Pine Ridge PI. The west side of Hess Place from the north Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P689 side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The south side of Church from 145 feet east of Hyssop to 896 feet east of Hyssop. Ground cover area: 24,018 square feet Hardscape: 26,617 square feet 2-3 The west side of Day Creek from 250 feet north of Appellation to Church. The east side of Day Creek from Church to Madrigal. The Day Creek median from Church to Baseline. The south side of Madrigal from Day Creek to Roundhill. Ground cover area: 35,420 square feet Hardscape: 42,671 square feet 2-4 Victoria Park Lane from Baseline to the east entrance of Arbor Park. The southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Baseline. The southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane to 445 feet east of Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 36,482 square feet Turf area: 3,874 square feet Hardscape: 32,927 square feet 2-5 The east and west side of Victoria Park Lane and the medians from Mosaic Dr. to Church. Ground cover area: 56,358 square feet Hardscape: 20,390 square feet 2-6 The north side of Church from Arbor Lane to Day Creek. The northwest corner of Church and Arbor Lane. The paseo from the north side of Church to Wilson Creek Dr... Ground cover area: 21,616 square feet Hardscape: 15,159 square feet 2-7 The north side of Church from Victoria Park Lane to Arbor Lane. The northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Church. The paseo from the north side of Church to Elk Cove Court. The paseo from the north side of Church to Freestone Court. The northeast corner of Arbor Lane and Church. Ground cover area: 16,609 square feet Hardscape: 13,730 square feet 2-8 The paseo from the west side of Etiwanda to Silver Rose Court. The north side of Church from Etiwanda to Victoria Park Lane. The east side of Iron Horse PI. from Church to Wild Horse Way. The paseo from the north side of Church to Cloudy Bay Ct. The medians from Iron Horse PI. to Etiwanda. Ground cover area: 35,122 square feet Hardscape: 28,473 square feet *863 square feet of ground cover added due to the addition of the Silver Rose paseo on 2- 14-07.The previous square footage was 34,259. 2-9 The landscaped slope behind existing landscape of site 2-5 on the west side of Victoria Park Lane from 475 feet north of Long Meadow Dr. to Long Meadow Dr. The landscape slope and curb adjacent parkway from Victoria Park Lane to 685 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 26,213 square feet Hardscape: 5,617 square feet VW-1 Base Line median from Victoria Park Lane to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 4,514 square feet Hardscape: 3,474 square feet Mulchscape: 0 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P690 VW-2 The north side of Baseline 300 feet east and 200 feet west of Swanson. The east and west sides of Swanson from Baseline to Province. The paseo from the intersection of Swanson and Province to Atwood with outlet to Dunmore. The paseo from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Saratoga from Powell to Dunmore. The paseo from Saratoga to Etiwanda. The south side of Atwood from Victoria Park Lane to Travis. The north side of Atwood from Walcott to Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 18,753 square feet Turf area: 73,931 squarefeet Hardscape: 22,615 square feet VW-3 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Baseline to the entrance to Victoria Village. Ground cover area: 24,453 square feet Turf area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape: 3,214 squarefeet VW-4 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood. Ground cover area: 30,695 square feet Turf area: 10,242 square feet Hardscape: 6,428 square feet VW-5 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 49,513 square feet Hardscape: 5,467 square feet VW-6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 285 square feet Hardscape: 679 square feet VW-7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 266 square feet Hardscape: 552 square feet VW-8 The Victoria Park Lane median and the' west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from the Southern Pacifc Railroad to Zinnia Ct. Ground cover area: 40,548 square feet Hardscape: 6,150 square feet Mulchscape: 0 square feet VW-9 The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from Barberry to North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park. Ground cover area: 9,188 square feet Turtarea: 3,851 squarefeet Hardscape: 3,720 square feet VW-10 The west side of Victoria Park Lane from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct... The Victoria Park Lane median from Zinnia Ct. to Dahlia Ct...The east side of Victoria Park Lane from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to Dahlia Ct. Ground cover area: 25,148 square feet Turf area: 37,350 square feet Hardscape: 11,400 square feet '4-15-10 Reduction of 2,250 square feet of ground cover. Area between Windrows Park and outer trail fence has been mulchscaped and turned over to the Parks Department. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P691 VW-11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct... The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct...The parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows Loop from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. Ground cover area: 23,082 square feet Turf area: 24,187 square feet Hardscape: 6,988 square feet VW-12 The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkway on the west side of north Victoria Windrows Loop from Silverberry to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the south side of Silverberry from 390 feet east of Day Creek to North Victoria Windrows Loop. Ground cover area: 149,010 square feet Turf area: 38,842 square feet Hardscape: 12,868 square feet VW-13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from 390 feet east of Day Creek to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Snapdragon. Ground cover area: 20,068 square feet Turf area: 16,476 square feet Hardscape: 7,200 square feet VW-14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Snapdragon to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the north and south side of Sugargum from South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood from Sugargum to Blazing Star. The parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Silktassel. Ground cover area: 21,466 square feet Turf area: 10,335 square feet Hardscape: 27,560 square feet VW-15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way from Peach to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way to Citrus. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locust and following that curb line to Silverberry. The parkway on the north side of Silverberry from North Victoria Windrows Loop 390 feet east of Day Creek. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Silverberry to Nasturtium. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Locust to Pistachio and continuing to Bougainvillea. Ground cover area: 45,929 square feet Turf area: 12,207 square feet Hardscape: 23,630 square feet VW-16 The south side of Highland from 455 feet east of Day Creek to 534 feet east of Locust. The east and west side of Locust from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus east to Bougainvillea Ct. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Twinspur to Locust. Ground cover area: 26,577 square feet Turf area: 23,922 square feet Hardscape: 19,203 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P692 VW-17 This site was modified and added to VW-16, 1-5-99. VW-18 The south side of Highland from 12583 Highland to Rockrose. Ground cover area: 2,800 square feet Turf area: 8,515 square feet Hardscape: 3,325 square feet VW-19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary to Rockrose. The east side of Rockrose from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland. The south side of Highland from Rockrose to Etiwanda. The horse trail from Highland and Etiwanda to the Fire Station. Ground cover area: 21,027 square feet Turf area: 32,266 square feet Hardscape: 11,298 square feet VW-20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Plum. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct. The paseo from Tipu PI. east to the open field. Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by VW-20 water meter, but is maintained by City crews. Ground cover area: 2,110 square feet Turf area: 16,411 square feet Hardscape:. 9,132 square feet VW-21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct. to the trail south of Kalmia St. The trail and paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of Kalmia St. to Etiwanda Ave. and north to the Fire Station. The south side of Basil St. from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina PI.. Ground cover area: 49,187 square feet Turf area: 57,532 square feet Hardscape: 19,600 square feet VW-22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose to the northeast corner of Windrows Park and from that corner to Plum. Ground cover area: 13,689 square feet Turf area: 19,953 square feet Hardscape: 9,489 square feet VW-23 The west side of Rockrose from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose to Twinspur. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Ct. to Rosemary. Ground cover area: 18,299 square feet Turf area: 3,425 square feet Hardscape: 10,352 square feet VW-24 The M.W.D. easement from Jasmine and Ironbark to Sweet Gum Dr. Ground cover area: 475 square feet Turf area: 4,730 square feet VW-25 The north side of Baseline from 384 feet west of Wanona to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Baseline to Craig. The Baseline median from Swanson PI. to Etiwanda. Ground cover area: 20,934 square feet Turf area: 3,079 square feet Hardscape: 12,799 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P693 VW-26 The paseo from Grape to 630 feet west of Grape. Ground cover area 7,021 square feet Hardscape: 8,548 square feet VW-27 The south side of Baseline from 251 feet west of Swanson to Etiwanda. The Baseline median from Victoria Park Lane to Swanson Place. Ground cover area 18,816 square feet Hardscape: 17,233 square feet "`This site had 2 667 feet of ground cover added due to addition of Baseline median 6-8- 2005. VG-1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont. The turf and ground cover from Highland on the west side of Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane south of the horse trail from 475 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 275 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont. The turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground cover area: 21,573 square feet Turf area: 47,604 square feet Hardscape: 17,300 square feet VG-2 The turf on the east side of York from Delaware to Fairmont. The ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from York Place and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park Lane. The turt and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane west of Milliken from Fairmont to Milliken. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from Victoria Park Lane to Fairmont. The Milliken median from Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 273 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park lane south of the horse trail from 468 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. Ground cover area: 29,395 square feet Turt area: 73,608 square feet Hardscape: 20,173 square feet VG-3 The turf and ground cover north of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Nova Ct. continuing on that curb line to York PI. and the turt south of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Armstrong PI. continuing on that curb line to York PI...The ground cover on the west side of York PI. from Fairmont to Delaware and the ground cover on the east side of York PI...The turt and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from Emerson continuing along that curb line to Armstrong PI... The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola PI. Ground cover area: 57,189 square feet Turf area: 38,343 square feet Hardscape: 26,848 square feet VG-4 The turt and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from Armstrong to Milliken. The turt and ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Milliken median from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester including the paseo to Baylor. The ground cover on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Nova Ct... The turf on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Armstrong. Ground cover area: 197,763 square feet Turt area: 24,151 square feet Hardscape: 12,278 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P694 VG-5 The paseo from Biola at Amarillo to Delaware at York. Ground cover area: 12,448 square feet Turt area: 44,896 square feet Hardscape: 7,992 square feet VG-6 The paseo beginning at the northeast corner of Victoria Groves Park and Fairmont and extending to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground cover area: 73,442 square feet Turf area: 74,778 square feet Hardscape: 16,629 square feet VG-7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly at Fairmont and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright from Donnelly to Pacific and the paseo from Pacific to Charleston. Ground cover area: 43,427 square feet Turf area: 51,765 square feet Hardscape: 15,806 square feet VG-8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park Lane from Milliken to Fairmont. The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 21,614 square feet Turt area: 8,614 square feet Hardscape: 8,281 square feet VG-9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon Way. The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 197 feet east of Fairmont. The turf on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 316 feet east of Fairmont. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore Dr. from Fairmont to Baltimore Ct... The turf and ground cover on the niirth side of Baltimore Dr. from Fairmont to Vanderbilt. The turt and ground cover on the east side of Vanderbilt from Baltimore to Brown. The paseo from Vanderbilt and Brown to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 48,481 square feet Turt area: 11,357 square feet Hardscape: 13,542 square feet VG-10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from 197 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken. The turf on the south side of Kenyon from 316 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken. The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Kenyon to 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Capitol from Brown to Bethany. The paseo from Capitol and Brown to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 34,241 square feet Turf area: 11,031 square feet Hardscape: 5,320 square feet VG-11 The east and west side parkways and median of Milliken from Baseline to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Baseline from 542 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. Ground cover area: 31,367 square feet Turt area: 17,264 square feet Hardscape: 25,524 square feet *This site was reduced on 4-1-2002 by 25,718 sq. ft. of, turf and 3,037 sq. ft. of ground cover Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P695 VG-12 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from the southeast corner of Milliken and Fairmont along the curb line to Victoria Park Lane. The turt and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from the southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Fairmont (located east of Milliken) and continuing along the curb line to Milliken. The turt on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 53,068 square feet Turf area: 36,431 square feet Hardscape: 27,004 square feet VG-13 The paseos from Victoria Park Lane to Verona, Verona to Napoli, and Genova to Tivoli. Ground cover area: 17,993 square feet Turf area: 16,344 square feet Hardscape: 8,376 square feet VG-14 The Baseline median from Milliken to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Baseline and following the curb line to Kenyon. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli. The turt and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground cover area: 89,456 square feet Turf area: 62,999 square feet Hardscape: 44,826 square feet VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Baseline. The turt and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Rochester to Ellena East. The Baseline Median from Rochester to Ellena East. The turt and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Baseline and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground cover area: 58,588 square feet Turt area: 57,306 square feet Hardscape: 36,014 square feet VG-16 The paseo from Baseline to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia and Pavola. Ground cover area: 9,661 square feet Turt area: 11,529 square feet Hardscape: 5,804 square feet VG-17 The paseo from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Fabriano to Martano. Ground cover area: 35,351 square feet Turt area: 40,291 square feet Hardscape: 16,394 square feet VG-18 The paseo from Rapallo to Gandino and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 4,281 square feet Hardscape: 1,308 square feet VG-19 The paseo from Tolentino to Pizolli and to Tolentino. Ground cover area: 12,555 square feet Turf area: 17,856 square feet Hardscape: 7,380 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P696 VG-20 The turt on the east side of Milliken from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken from 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the southeast corner at Milliken heading east to Fairmont. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to the northeast corner of Milliken and Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the west side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane to Lomello. The Victoria Park Lane median from Milliken to Pandino Ct...The Milliken median from Victoria Park Lane to 440 feet south of Kenyon. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 76,232 square feet Turf area: 97,979 square feet Hardscape: 22,177 square feet VG-21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane to Lomello. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 547 feet east of Kenyon. The turt and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from Fairmont to 422 feet east of Kenyon. The turt and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Kenyon to Rapallo. The paseo from Kenyon to Bari. The Victoria Park Lane median from Pandino Ct. to Portofino Ct... Ground cover area: 69,167 square feet Turf area: 58,692 square feet Hardscape: 34,478 square feet VG-22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 653 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 547 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester. The Victoria Park Lane median from Portofino Ct. to Rochester Ave... The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane north of the sidewalk from Kenyon to the east side of Vintage Park. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Vintage Park to Rochester. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 83,397 square feet Turt area: 89,674 square feet Hardscape: 20,863 square feet VG-23 The turt and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to 409 feet west of Grimaldi. The ground cover on the south side of Portofino from Kenyon to Bergano. The turf and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark from Kenyon to the west property line of Rancho Cucamonga High School. The ground cover on the east and west side of Matera from Lark to Pescara. The ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi from Kenyon to Brindisi. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon from Lark to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello from Kenyon to Landriano. The paseo from southwest corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 63,733 square feet Turf area: 82,565 square feet Hardscape: 39,297 square feet VG-24 The north side of Kenyon from Autumn Glen court to Woodruff. The east side of Woodruff from Kenyon to 403 feet north of Kenyon. Ground cover area: 8,447 square feet Turt area: 5,320 square feet Hardscape: 5,622 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P697 VG-25 The paseo west of Torino from Kenyon to Highland. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the northwest corner of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440. Ground cover area: 40,800 square feet Turf area: 24,134 square feet Hardscape: 14,353 square feet VG-26 The paseo from Brindisi Ct. to Messina. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi Ct. to the end of the cul-de-sac. The turt and ground cover on the west side of Messina from the paseo to Treviso Way. Ground cover area: 18,905 square feet Turf area: 1,141 square feet Hardscape: 3,615 square feet VG-27 The Milliken median from 440 feet south of Kenyon to Highland. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon. Ground cover area: 4,030 square feet Turt area: 3,006 square feet Hardscape: 4,222 square feet 'Reduced 1,670 square feet of G.C. on 7-1-00 VG-28 The east side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground cover area: 60,902 square feet Hardscape: 5,593 square feet VG-29 The north side of Kenyon from Milliken to Fairmont. The groundcover on the east side of Fairmont, east of the sidewalk, from Kenyon to the 210 freeway. Ground cover area: 20,178 square feet Turf area: 16,877 square feet Hardscape: 5,736 square feet *Reduction of 18,940 of turf on 7-1-00. * Reduction of 5,670 square feet of groundcover on 3-20-03. VG-30 The south side of Tresenda from Santo to Sapada. The paseo from Sapada to Carano. The south side of Montella from Carano to Trivento. Ground cover area: 6,797 square feet Turt area: 2,462 square feet Hardscape: 4,860 square feet VG-31 The east side of Brienza from Larino to Letini. The west side of Tindari from Letini to Larino. The Greenbelt on the south side of Marconi from Trivento to Comisco. The east side of Comisco from Scalea to Santo. Ground cover area: 23,419 square feet Turf area: 18,351 square feet Hardscape: 13,764 square feet VG-32 The north side of Candela from Terini to Bettoloa. Ground cover area: 20,172 square feet Turf area: 8,190 square feet Hardscape: .8,292 square feet VG-33 The paseo at the north end of Sapri to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape: 318 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P698 VG-34 The paseo at the north end of Bronte to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape: 318 square feet VG-35 The east side of Rochester from 555 feet south of Palmi to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane and median from Rochester to east side of Deer Creek Channel. Ground cover area: 53,646 square feet Turf area: 11,150 square feet Hardscape: 17,555 square feet VG-36 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester. Ground cover area: 55,780 square feet Turt area: 10,500 square feet Hardscape: 8,004 square feet VG-37 The paseo at the end of Ardmoor Ct. to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 1,350 square feet Hardscape: 950 square feet VG-38 The east side of Milliken from 106 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to.Kenyon. The north and south side of Spring Mist Drive from Milliken to Summerstone. The south side of Kenyon from Milliken to Kenyon Park. Ground cover area: 28,051 square feet Turf area: 4,533 square feet Hardscape: 12,879 square feet VG-39 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from Kenyon paseo to 132 feet east of Milliken. The Kenyon paseo from Victoria Park Lane to Fairwinds Court. The paseo from Victoria Park Lane to the south west corner of Kenyan Park. Ground cover area: 55,089 square feet Turf area: 13,120 square feet Hardscape: 7,676 square feet VG-40 The south side of Highland from 413 feet west of Highland paseo to Highland paseo. The east side of Highland paseo from Highland to Kenyon. The north side of Kenyan from Highland paseo to Autumn Glen Court. Ground cover area: 56,553 square feet Hardscape: 12,314 square feet VG-41 The west side of Rochester from 294 feet south of Highland to Lark. The north side of Lark from Rochester to 1230 feet west of Rochester. Ground cover area: 31,413 square feet Hardscape: 13,338 square feet VG-42 The south side of Highland from 1314 feet west of Rochester to Rochester. The west side of Rochester from Highland to 294 feet south of Highland. The north side of Highland from Rochester to Woodruff. Ground cover area: 40,346 square feet. Hardscape: 15,445 square feet 'This site originally was 18,464 square feet before the addition of 21,882 square feet to the north side of Highland. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P699 VG-43 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and the median from Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Channel. The east and west side of Kensington PI. from Victoria Park Lane to Stratford Dr. Ground cover area: 70,669 square feet Turf area: 7,888 square feet Hardscape: 18,426 square feet VG-44 The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from 572 feet north of Silverberry to Day Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry from Kensington to Day Creek Blvd. Ground cover area: 36,835 square feet Hardscape: 24,376 square feet VG-45 The west side of Milliken and the Milliken median from the 210 freeway to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 10,658 square feet Turt area: 610 square feet Hardscape: 5,589 square feet VG-46 The Baseline median from 657 feet east of Virginia Dr. to Rochester. The north side of Baseline from 278 feet east of Virginia to Rochester. The paseo from the northeast corner of Rochester and Base Line to Huntley. The east side of Rochester from Baseline to 105 feet north of Shenandoah. Ground cover area: 33,135 square feet Hardscape: 19,340 square feet VG-47 The north side of Baseline from 400 feet east of Day Creek Btvd. to Day Creek Blvd. Baseline median from Day Creek Blvd. to 595 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground cover area: 9,515 square feet. Hardscape: 7,926 square feet 'This site had an addition 6-8-2004 6,272 square feet of ground cover for median. VG-48 The east side of Day Creek Blvd. and median from Baseline to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Blvd. to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground cover area: 50,318 square feet Turf Area: 3,234 square feet Hardscape: 29,217 square feet VG-49 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. The south side of Highland from Day Creek Blvd. to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground cover area: 51,459 square feet Turf Area: 3,930 square feet Hardscape: 32,296 square feet VG-50 The west side of San Carmelo from 389 feet north of Baseline to Baseline. The north side of Baseline from Carmelo to 264 feet west of Durness. Ground cover area: 18,043 square feet Hardscape: 12,383 square feet VG-51 The Paseo south of Saxon to Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 1,398 square feet Hardscape: 969 square feet VG-52 The north side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to Kensington. The south side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to 111 feet east of Suffolk. Ground cover area: 4,362 square feet Hardscape: 3,325 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P700 VG-53 The south side of Victoria Park Lane from 296 feet west of Kensington to Milliken. The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from Victoria Park Lane to 397 feet south of Sugar Gum. Ground cover area: 28,532 square feet TurtArea: 11,070 square feet Hardscape: 7,720 square feet VG-54 The east side of Rochester from Shenandoah to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 6,684 square feet Hardscape: 5,136 square feet VG-55 The paseo north of Westhaven to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 1,775 square feet Hardscape: 2,575 square feet VG-56 The south side of Highland from 1,317 feet west of Day Creek to 1,085 feet west of Day Creek including the non-irrigated slope on the south side of the sidewalk. Ground cover area: 6,864 square feet Hardscape: 1,761 square feet VG-57 The north side of Highland from Fairmont Way to the Day Creek Channel. Ground cover area: 16,157 square feet Hardscape: 17,405 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P701 >a Z ~ w J J ~tltlONVM113 O ~ N 2 '~ er yw m ~ d q ~ ~ ~ cc~ ~i W N' b ~ v ~ ~ ~ C C ~ 1 ~ .J~ N N ~i ~ ~ O N %V, O O O Y r ~ s°i o ~ °°..... ~ ° ~ ~ ~-° M O Oo ~ ~ ~ ~ O O evi ~ If' Om ~ O OO / ~~ ~h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ti N ~. O ~, O O` z ~ N S N 5 ~~ O O > ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ N n !1. Z m 2,~ m r O _O o' (9 Sd ' S CJ U~ > > > ~ h N O O O ~~ N V- N U ~9 N3321~ AVO "~ O > cr ~ ~ ~ o n > > uNi O Z d U' j ~n ~. > d ~ +.. o p > ~1 ~ ~ ''" 9 i o Q a 0 ~ r~ ~• M OM ~ > C O ~ O O _ ~ O <i O ~tl 2131S3H~021 w ~ ~ ~ > 07~ (N9 m s E~_g_ S` .n QAQvgo~&mE ~~F°-es~ ~' _ asn ~mso~@t~~rya ~5 O m ~J M ID Oy Nbnaj~x?~a OUTS m~ y O ~ OO O ~ > > €rcb@x$S`r 5~an ~U~`o ., I~w O NN ~~ O O -~.CEg05 °~, _c qo~F ma'~w > N > > > M M ~nU S. P~~c OV CUR oo~~aa J U' A III O > ~ R, gS~Q9o~o S'•E ~-e'`~H ~ r O ¢ 4 d O > ~ (7 `7 m~~b~M$'62~c°''dSaSq n' O Z h M O~ N O N> ~ (~ rmKd~4oo R'ca ammm `o ~°~m r N ~ U' U' ~ ('1 ~ Q nm n5 r°u~~oorv EQS~owo _ ~ > > > > > > m E°m@~°~'~~onea° °m -¢ m Vn € ~a- c' OO O O O °6m~ _ __......----- -. m~ m v- ra° h ntl N3NIdlIW ~bRr~~=~°=_~s3~Sb Fax O O > d ~ ~ .. ~ ~ Q N ~ _ -_~ _ > F N .O ~ O >~ a J .~ - _ r ~ O c7 Z ~ Q h K a W v ~ ~ d Z F' N Z W «~ >® > Of O ~ ~ O ~ w m ~ > ~ B J ~ w `" o ~_ m Y LL g w w ~ '' ocQi ~ ¢ O Z ~ `w ¢ ¢ Z H ~ ~ a ~ 3~ 3~ O a a- m LL a „kL ~~ s` ~ Lii O W << ~ ~ ® a P702 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012/13 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $681,510.00 Overtime Salaries 1,090.00 Part-time Salaries 80,320.00 Fringe Benefits 327.900.00 Subtotal Personnel $1,090,820.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $56,550.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 5,000.00 Contrail Services 825,290.00 Tree Maintenance 94,950.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,180.00 Water Utilities 720,960.00 Eleildc Utilities 82,660.00 Assessment Administration 34,870.00 General Overhead 190.020.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $2,011,480.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlav -Vehicles 50.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $3,102,300.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,973,060.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (92.420.00) Total Estimated Revenues $2,880,640.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 221.660.00 Total Expenditure Budget ~ $3,102,300.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,973,059.63 Total District EBU Count 7,045.17 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $422.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $422.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P703 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which. shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $2,614,610.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 221,660.00 Ooeratina Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $2,392,950.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P704 Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Caoital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: O~eratina Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P705 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Secfion 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). " The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P706 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights- of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the.District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P707 method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Condominium 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi -Family 1.00 Dwelling Unit Commercial/ Industrial 2.00 Acre Vacant (incl. all undeveloped property) 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $422.00 . - $422.00 6,347.00 6,347.00 Multi-family $422.00 $422.00 589.00 589.00 Commercial/Industrial $422.00 $422.00 52.27 104.54 Vacant $422.00 $422.00 18.50 4.63 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2012113 P708 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2012/13 N w ~~ V •~ N 1= J Q O ~ ~ ® c 1 ~_ ~ ny AJJay~ U ~ C1 y u~ o i V i. ; .._.._.._.._ ~ J ti.r ~ o / •V i y N ~ 1 C 00 0: o ~ ~ y ~ ~ t 0 3 0 ///C 1 m lL Q !V ~ - CC i ~. _.._ _.._.. ~ int/ise3 ~ in i ® i r ~ i ny epuenng3 ' i ny epueM43 -~ i C1 ~ i h i - ~ ~e >IaaJ~ ~(ea i C ._.._.._.._.._.._.._..1 i ~ ny Jalsayooa J i i ny Jalsayooa ~..~ j 1 1 ny ua>I!II!W ~._.._.._.._.._ _ - i ny ua>I!II!W i i i i i i ny uaneH ~ - ~ i my uaneH i i _ ny esowJaH j ! ny esowJaH i I nV Pleq!yoJy ~ jnb' pleq!yoJy i ny uewllaH i ~+~" i ~ ny uewllaH I I 't•• L L a ny p e~(au !n lS uepawe~ ~ - i t.._.._ •' ~ -p .•~ ~ t .. .. ~.._.•-'Y.._..°_ _ _r nd anOJ~ g'a gg•~pgE~r R5 BB¢§ ~F4a ~"~ d ti_.5 •~.•~ •~• to c L J m K 3 ~ t t a CE E^c! d'd y J~s y@ £ ~ ~ 3 7 g aa ee D: ~ CO LL .. ~ 5 P@~P EE N f0 ye ep CC~~~S~C ~~~26 m ~~gg ~~~~a~a ~ ~~ ~ a Er°d g~.i S$yayyyy~sej la~IPBa pzB~~ g 8 8 EEf 2€ d Y e e P710 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $422.00 6,347.00 6,347.00 $2,678,434.00 Multi-family $422.00 589.00 589.00 $248,558.00 Commercial/Industrial $422.00 52.27 104.54 $44,115.88 Vacant $422.00 18.50 4.63 $1,951.75 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $422.00 - 6,347.00 6,347.00 $2,678,434.00 Multi-family $422.00 589.00 569.00 $248,558.00 Commercial/Industrial $422.00 52.27 104.54 $44,115.88 Vacant $422.00 18.50 4.63 $1,951.75 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no Annexations effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P711 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop) P712 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A (HYSSOP MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P713 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ....................................:.................:..........................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ....................................................:.......................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General ...................................................:......................... ..........................................9 General Benefit ................................................................ ..............:...........................9 Special Benefit .....................................:........................... ........................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P714 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12- 097, aResolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots andlor parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received: and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in propgrtion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012/13 Total Estimated Assessment $3,720.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 630.00 Total Estimated Revenue $4,350.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 3 680.00 Total Expenditure Budget $8,030.00 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $413.74 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P715 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Ccuncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. kpFESSiOkq~ ~pREWSF~Y lG9Cm Mark A. S e irector of Engineering Services/City Engineer No. C053672 9 Exp.O.30.1 3_ ~ Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P716 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the , proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P717 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority tc levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to ttie financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P718 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City South and East of Hyssop Drive south of 6~h Street. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use, cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriotive location J-1 The west side of Hyssop from south of 6'" street to the south end of the cul-de-sac. Ground Cover area: 6,050 square feet. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P719 Z H S F fD 5~ ~..............~..................................1.15 ONRP ~ ~ ~.~" ~ ~ ,.~ ai ' day ~ U s Z U~ E ~6 CGS ',=~- U a ~ ~ ~ w z ~ w w n ~ w ~ O F J O F y > g m J gW (~ ~ (7 Y~ O $ W ~ K Q M O Z V ~ •i o ~ Q M ,~ o V ~ C ~ ~ N C ~ o ~ > .~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ° Q ° ~ o v J - ~_~=~~ _ Yms =sY__e •:ei EeE• iY~~S~oY-O CE ~;e~;= s°° ~c o~ e_ ^-3~east~8~ e°c•EcES~sg`o9~yesT- o° e¢~:^E ~rt y ~ °~ c'3i eGOc E_n LU:u~fi StiiF'S+E ge` .::EiYE ~°c `. od~`S:e: N P720 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012N3 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $500.00 Contract Services _ 5,940.00 Utilities Water Utilities 900.00 Electric Utilities 600.00 Assessment Administration 50.00 General Overhead 40.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $8,030.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $8,030.00 Total Estimated Assessment $3,720.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 630.00 Total Estimated Revenue $4,350.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 3.680.00 Total Expenditure Budget $8,030.00 Total Estimated Assessment $3,723.66 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $413.74 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P721 may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $44,580.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (3,680.00) Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $40,900.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to pertorm maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P722 concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Caoital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual casts. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P723 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots orparcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P724 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located. within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights- of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District,~and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community ahd proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by-the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it:has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012113 P725 method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Non-Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type. determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Non-Residential $413.74 $413.74 9 9 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs-for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P726 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 M v.. V .~ ~F+ Q Q ~ I N ~~ ~ ~ I C j ._.._.._.._ M AC, 1 W ' ~ ~ .C 1 1 ~ i ny epuerM33 ~ ~ i ~ ~8 ~aa~~ ~(ed a ._.._.._.._.._.._.._ ny ~alsayooa J i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.. .._- . ny ti~a4~ v 0: d C _ J m ~ N L 3 f0 m + - Q O LL Q N ~N ® ~ O 0 N O ny uaneH ny esowiaH nb' PIe9!4o~b' ny uewllaH lg uegawe~ .__- ~ Q' C N ~ C N (0 m i~ t N E Q J O C (J ~ ~ ~. 't '• J 1.r nH lse3 in t v ..I_.._.._.. ny epuenn!33 ny ~alsayooa ny ua~!II!W jny uaneH i ! ny esow~aH i i jnV Pleq!4o~b' i ~' ~ ny uewllaH <"~~ t L ~ ny p~e~(awn ' ny anal L J -_ 3 L m d L O a0 N m ~ a P728 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $413.74 9 9 $3,723.66 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $413.74 9 9 $3,723.66 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P729 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) P730 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P731 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment ..............................................:..............................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................8 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 9 District Budget ............................................................................................................9 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................10 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 12 General .....................................................................................................................12 General Benefit ........................................................................................................12 Special Benefit .........:...............................................................................................13 Method of Assessment Spread .......................:........................................................13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 15 16 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................16 Annexations ..............................................................................................................16 P732 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12- 097, aResolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012113 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012/13 Total Estimated Assessment $992,850.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 48 560.00 Total Estimated Revenue $944,290.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 392 540.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,338,830.00 Total District EBU Count 2,814.21 Actual Assessment per EBU ~ $352.80 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $352.80 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P733 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. No. C053672 Exp. 6.30.1 3 Mark A. Steue~; Director of Engineering ServiceslCity Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P734 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P735 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters.in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The.City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P736 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the commercial and industrial area of the City which is generally bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the north, 4`h Street on the South, East Avenue on the east and Grove Avenue on the west. Reference is also made tc the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines,. ground cover, and turt. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive location J-2 The monument at the northeast corner of Haven and 4th Street. Ground Cover area: 5,715 square feet Turf area: 6,068 square feet J-3 The 6th street median from Milliken to Pittsburg. Ground Cover area: 3,300 square feet J-4 The entry monuments on the east and west side of 4th and Milliken. Ground Cover area: 19,771 square feet Turt area 9,060 square feet J-5 The Milliken median from Arrow to Jersey Ground Cover area: 10,220 square feet J~ The Spruce median from Foothill to White Oak. Ground Cover area: 4,300 square feet J-7 The 6th Street median from Pittsburg to Richmond. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2012113 P737 Ground Cover area: 5,114 square feet J-8 The 6th Street median from Richmond to Buffalo. Ground Cover area: 2,476 square feet J-9 The Milliken railroad underpass. Ground Cover area: 165,633 square feet 12-12-01 added 5199 sq feet Turt area: 4,897 square feet J-10 The 6th street median from Cleveland to 1,820 feet east of Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 13,310 square feet J-11 The 6th Street median from Buffalo to Rochester. Ground cover area: 12,400 square feet J-12 The Milliken median from Arrow to Century. Ground Cover area: 13,855 square feet J-13 The Milliken median from Century to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 3,330 square feet J-14 The 6th Street median from Utica to Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 8,559 square feet J-15 The 6th Street median form Haven to Utica. Ground Cover area: 7,680 square feet. J-16 Day Creek median from Church to Foothill. Ground cover area: 8,466 square feet *Site was 2-9 and maintained by TruGreen. Now maintained by Mariposa. J-17 The Day Creek medians south of Foothill including the traffic circle. Ground cover area: 6,490 square feet *Site was 2-10 and maintained by TruGreen. Now maintained by Mariposa. H-1 The Haven median from 4th Street to 6th Street. Ground cover area: 12,270 square feet Turf area: 8,935 square feet H-2 The Haven medians from 6th Street to the underpass bridge. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven from Acacia Street to underpass bridge. Ground cover area: 51,760 square feet Turf area: 2,960 square feet *Site increased on 9-22-10 due to Haven Underpass Project. H-3 The Haven medians from underpass bridge to Arrow Route. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven from the underpass bridge to Jersey Blvd. Ground cover area: 53,181 square feet Turf area: 3,029 square feet *Site increased on 9-22-10 due to Haven Underpass Project. H-4 The Haven median from Arrow Route to Foothill. Ground cover area: 8,348 square feet Turf area: 6,808 square feet H-5 The Haven median from Foothill to Church. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2012/13 P738 H-5 The Haven median from Foothill to Church. . Ground cover area: 6,216 square feet Turf area: 5,286 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 11,502; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-3 The Foothill median from 790 feet west of Market Place to Market Place. Ground cover area: 4,434 square feet FH-4 The Foothill median from Market Place to Etiwanda. Ground cover area: 10,392 square feet FH-5 The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr. to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-6 The Foothill median from Masi Plaza to Rochester. Ground cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-7 The Foothill boulevard median from Vineyard to Orchard Plaza. Ground cover area: 2,605 square feet FH-8 The Foothill boulevard median from Orchard Plaza to Lion Street. Ground cover area: 344 square feet FH-9 The Foothill boulevard median from Hellman to Malachite, and from Malachite to Archibald. Ground cover area: 21,474 square feet. FH-10 The Foothill boulevard median from Archibald to Ramona. Ground cover area: 4,770 square feet FH-11 The Foothill boulevard median from Ramona to Hermosa. Ground cover area: 5,210 square feet FH-12 The Foothill boulevard median from Hermosa to Center. Ground cover area: 6,329 square feet FH-13 The Foothill boulevard median from Center to Haven. Ground cover area: 6,286 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2012/13 P739 FH-14 The Foothill boulevard median from Rochester to 600 feet east of Rochester. Ground cover area: 1,356 square feet Site reduced 5,979 square feet due to median renovation. FH-15 The Foothill boulevard median from 1,225 feet west of Day Creek to Day Creek. Ground cover area: 4,905 square feet FH-16 The Foothill boulevard median from Day Creek to the 15 freeway. Ground cover area: 9,808 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2012/13 P740 Z~ r,>~~ 4~ •.• M Uei ut3 ntl aP Z V ~L N fl ' _ lQ Q V =_ Y L A, W ~ ~ Q C C ny uaneH Q (,~ ntl esouuaH (~ ^tl peQi4aM J ntl uewllaH IS ntl uegil l~W rc N i m m N _ ~i 0 t U =Z U~ a6 -~ U m H•. C Rlt pl m 8 LL J Q H a . rn ~? ~ a w z ~ U ~ w w ~ w Z ~ Z J R O ~ O w ~ Q U m C7 w ~ ~ ~ o O w f"= ! ~ o ~ ii ! I i u i..~ _c~ G ~ ~ n s ~-I M '~ ntl lsayaoy M ~ b ~ Ol ~ ~ i < A n iy uaq!II!W ~~ N r souuaH O Ia9i4aM 0 ny uewlleH iN _ _°~~Ee _ _ _ FE=vE. _' EEE.op_v= eEu _~€ ~~im. i3 `n~~s - E V ~ a _ntl anoi~ €_:QT-z`g F2 _ ~ ¢ eEa - SEe -e _~ ~ = c3..E oEa -~~Ea~~ ~Ea~~ ~C ~_'~ `eLe~Sa- ~. -fit ccEo:Ea'9Ev'mE ~ e c46• E pQ~• E .E~ gs~_~sce P741 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012/13 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $317,220.00 Overtime Salaries 2,630.00 Part-time Salaries 53,700.00 Fringe Benefits 155.990.00 Subtotal Personnel $529,540.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $58,900.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilities 8,500.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 1,500.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 2,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 12,000.00 Contract Services 400,420.00 Contract Services/Facilities 98,500.00 Tree Maintenance 21,850.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,560.00 Water Utilities 87,020.00 Electric Utilities 44,230.00 Assessment Administration 6,170.00 General Overhead 54.640.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $797,290.00 Capital Expenditures C~a ital Projects $10.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $10,000.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,336,830.00 Total Estimated Assessment $992,850.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (48.560.001 Total Estimated Revenue $944,290.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 392.540.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,336,830.00 Total Estimated Assessment $992,853.19 Total District EBU Count 2,814.12 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $352.80 r2 12/ Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2012/13 P742 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $842,180.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (392,540.00) Ooeratina Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $449,640.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Ooerations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B - Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2012/13 P743 services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2012113 P744 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). " The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any fprmula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012113 P745 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights- of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P746 method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Non-Residential 1.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Rate .Total Total er EBU er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Non-Residential $352.80 $352.80 2,814.21 2,814.21 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P747 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2012/13 m M ~~ w N •_ i m ~ ,~ Q O C ' ~ () ~ O '~ _ ny ~(JJa4~• OI ti V 1 .._.._.._.._: ~ ~ J ti ~~ o C I N N. C_ ^ ~ J m Q' O N = '"fir ~ f0 .-~ `O m ~ ~ ll. Q j _ • ®• ny lse3 in i ~ my epueMR3 ny epueMg3 Q j ^1 ~ ~ ~'~ .. a ~9 ~aaJ~ Rea _` ^ ^ y_u_o_o_o_.._o_oL C ny Jalsayoo~{ ~ j ny Jalsayooa J .. ,...~ i ny ua>I!II!W r._.._.._.._.._.._ ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ~. - ny uaneH ny esowJaH ny esowJaH . ^- ny Ple4!4oJb' ny Pleq!yoJd ~~ .^ ^ ny uewpaH ^ N ny uewllaH ~ L L ~ ny pJe~(au!n 3S uellawe~ g€Y§5~~E5P°z °~~S:YFE P~ E L~fi~~~~8c~ ~ nd anOJ~ 9°4€~ n'3 `~ U1 C m D! V) L = 6~3js v ~ m o Q ~$ i4ge§3 ~ C Ctl LL p=`Y~$$g sE$gaeea{g~ .C c 5~;~{i48~$~~y N N .aL4 3r~•YPEj gg ggs ~ 07 &~~;z~$3¢~~i a3 !¢~6~`ePeg• ~~ Y;a a8"~ 5~~ E~~oj 3 ~ ~ 8a8o LEP~<E€e P749 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $352.80 2,814.21 2,814.21 $992,853.19 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $352.80 2,814.21 2,814.21 $992,853.19 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P750 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) P751 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4-R (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P752 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ...................................................:...........................................11 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 12 District Budget ..........................................................................................................12 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................13 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 15 General .............:.......................................................................................................15 General Benefit ........................................................................................................15 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................16 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................16 Cost Of Living Inflator ...............................................................................................18 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 19 20 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................20 Annexations .............................................................................................................. 20 P753 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No.12- 097a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012113 Total Estimated Assessment $2,548,100.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 26 050.00 Total Estimated Revenue $2,522,050.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 440,450.00 Total Expenditure Budget $2,962,500.00 Total District EBU Count 6,705.54 Actual Assessment per EBU ~ $380.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $380.00 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P754 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements,have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. >AOFESSJpy9 PNDREWgT~Fyy ~ Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineer ServiceslCity Engineer No: C053572 ~ 9 Exp, &301 3 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P755 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of, landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P756 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information,'the reasoh for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P757 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Terra Vista Planned Community, which is located north of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue, east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road and includes the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines; ground cover, and turt. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surtacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: The street trees within the residential parkways and tree maintenance easements to be maintained by the District are on the following streets, located within the boundaries of the District: Amiata Dr Bastia Ct Blackhorse Ct Brandywine PI Bunkerhill Dr Cedarbrook PI Chesterton Dr Claridge PI Clarisa PI Corsica Ct (Countryview to Milliken) Countryview (Mt. View to Palacio) Covington PI Danbury Dr Danner Ct De Anza Dr Derby PI Downing Ct Ellena Wy (s/o Terra Vista to Fizpatrick) Emery PI Fitzpatrick Dr Fulbourn Ct Hinton Ct Linaro Rd Meyers Dr Potomac Ct Radcliff PI Regent Dr Rockingham Ct Sarzanza PI Southhampton Ct Terra Vista Pky (Church to Brandywine) Wellington PI Yorktown Ct Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P758 The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location TV-1 The Base Line median from Haven to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 16,613 square feet . Turt area: 19,030 square feet Hardscape area: 10,630 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 2,769 square feet of ground cover area and 1,478 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City, however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. N-2 The Base Line median from Spruce to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 13,504 square feet Turt area: 16,109 square feet Hardscape area: 12,575 square feet Due to the Location of the improvements, an additional 2,749 square feet of ground cover area and 1,598 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City, however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. TV-3 The Base Line median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 8,418 square feet Turf area: 13,573 square feet Hardscape area: 16,567 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 5,247 square feet of ground cover area and 4,289 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City, however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. TV-4 The south side of Base Line from 800 feet east of Spruce to Milliken. The cul-de-sac at the north end of Cascade. Ground Cover area: 9,278 square feet Turt area: 12,659 square feet Hardscape area: 7,950 square feet N-5 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Belpine to 112 feet west of Buttertield; Terra Vista Parkway median from Spruce to Milliken and the south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 164 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 13,411 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 12,978 square feet N-6 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Spruce to 175 feet north of Countryside and Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 17,991 square feet Turf area: 11,413 square feet Hardscape area: 11,452 square feet N-7 The north side of Church from the Deer Creek Channel to Terra Vista Parkway. The west side of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to 175 feet north of Countryside. Ground Cover area: 9,924 square feet Turf area: 5,378 square feet Hardscape area: 6,426 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2012113 P759 TV-8 The southeast corner of Church and Haven; the Church median from Haven to Terra Vista Parkway and the wash end on the Northwest corner of the Deer Creek Channel and Church. Ground Cover area: 26,876 square feet Turf area: 2,306 square feet Hardscape area: 2,788 square feet TV-9 The Church median from Terra Vista Parkway to Elm. Ground Cover area: 7,829 square feet Hardscape area: 6,605 square feet TV-10 The east side of Valencia from Base Line to the pre-school; the south side of Augusta from Valencia to Meadow Lark and the west side of Summerfield from Valencia to Evergreen. Ground Cover area: 20,818 square feet Turt area: 18,634 square feet Hardscape area: 8,666 square feet TV-11 The paseo at Parkside and Clover from Parkside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,795 square feet Hardscape area: 1,049 square feet TV-12 The east side of Haven from the pre-school to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,170 square feet Turt area: 2,091 square feet Hardscape area: 1,060 square feet TV-13 The east side of Spruce from Elm to Mountain View; the north and south sides of Norfolk from Spruce to Cardiff; the south side of Mountain View from Spruce to 290 feet east of Belvedere and the paseo from Spruce to Countryview. Ground Cover area: 8,459 square feet Turt area: 3,355 square feet Hardscape area: 8,886 square feet TV-14 The south side of Mountain View from 290 feet east of Belvedere to 590 feet east of Fairhaven; the paseo south of Mountain View between Belvedere and Fairhaven to Country View and from Countryview Drive to West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 19,030 square feet Turt area: 8,430 square feet Hardscape area: 9,262 square feet TV-15 The north side of Mountain View from 634 feet west of Biarritz to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet Turf area: 4,738 square feet Hardscape area: 5,104 square feet TV-16 The west Greenway Corridor from the northeast corner of Elm and Spruce to West Greenway. Ground Cover area: 15,529 square feet Turf area: 20,884 square feet Hardscape area: 20,626 square feet TV-17 The west side of Milliken from 585 feet north of Mountain View to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 5,835 square feet Turf area: 3,564 square feet Hardscape area: 2,340 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P760 TV-18 The south side of Mountain View from approximately 250 feet west of Claridge to Terra Vista Parkway. The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 18,316 square feet Turf area: 5,944 square feet Hardscape area: 23,800 square feet TV-19 The Terra Vista Parkway median from Milliken to Mountain View. The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from 68 feet north of Addison to Mountain View. The west side of Mountain View from Grapevine to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 20,306 square feet Turf area: 3,886 square feet Hardscape area: 11,478 square feet N-20 The Church median from Milliken to 675 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 2,860 square feet Hardscape area: 2,112 square feet TV-21 The Church median from Milliken to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 16,811 square feet Turt area: 335 square feet Hardscape area: 14,880 square feet TV-22 The Milliken median from Mountain View to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 16,436 square feet Hardscape area: 16,267 square feet TV-23 The Milliken underpass from West Greenway Park to Milliken Park. Ground Cover area: 19,271 square feet Turf area: 22,139 square feet Hardscape area: 18,119 square feet TV-24 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 600 feet north of Creekbridge; the north side of Creekbridge from Brookside to Haven and the paseo from Creekbridge and Brookside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 5,851 square feet Turt area: 9,965 square feet Hardscape area: 4,351 square feet N-25 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 410 feet south of Creekbridge. Ground Cover area: 3,319 square feet Turt area: 1,677 square feet Hardscape area: 1,779 square feet TV-26 The paseo at Plymouth south of Essex from Plymouth to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,956 square feet Hardscape area: 2,385 square feet N-27 The paseo from Terra Vista Parkway to Windsong and from Windsong to Plymouth. Ground Cover area: 2,270 square feet Turf area: 2;731 square feet Hardscape area: 3,332 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P761 N-28 The paseo at 7552 Hardy. Ground Cover area: 630 square feet Turf area: 733 square feet Hardscape area: 432 square feet N-29 The East Greenway Corridor from Milliken Park to Terra Vista Parkway, including the turf area at the entrance to Tract 16157. Ground Cover area: 17,780 square feet Turf area: 52,403 square.feet Hardscape area: 29,888 square feet TV-30 The Milliken Median from Mountain View to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,890 square feet Hardscape area: 10,260 square feet N-31 The paseo from Elm to West Greenway Park. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet Hardscape area: 8,900 square feet N-32 The Greenwich paseo from Greenwich to Muirtield. Ground Cover area: 1,323 square feet Hardscape area: 1,456 square feet N-33 The south side of Mountain View from 430 feet west of Country View to Country View. Ground Cover area: _ - 3,434 square feet Turf area: 1,853 square feet Hardscape area: 1,720 square feet N-34 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 390 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 1,342 square feet Turt area: 1,887 square feet Hardscape area: 1,612 square feet N-35 The Trail Northeast of Ruth Musser School from Terra Vista Parkway to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 9,285 square feet Hardscape area: 5,148 square feet N-36 The north side Meyers from Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 9,141 square feet Turf area: 5,895 square feet Hardscape area: 6,058 square feet N-37 The north side of Meyers from Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,300 square feet Hardscape area: 1,283 square feet N-38 The Church median from Rochester to Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to 853 north of Church. Ground Cover area: 8,510 square feet Hardscape area: 5,640 square feet N-39 The north side of Mountain View from 250 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. The eastside of Milliken from Mountain View to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 16,751 square feet Hardscape area: 15,716 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P762 N-40 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 11,630 square feet Hardscape area: 19,738 square feet N-41 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 4,081 square feet Hardscape area: 9,640 square feet N-42 The north side of Mountain View from Terra Vista Parkway to 250 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 10,994 square feet Hardscape area: 14,777 square feet N-43 Church median and parkway from Malaga to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 7,506 square feet Hardscape area: 3,955 square feet N-44 The south side of Church from Terra Vista Parkway to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 10,400 square feet Hardscape area: 7,606 square feet N-45 The west side of Rochester from Church to Malaga. Ground Cover area: 20,693 square feet Hardscape area: 12,450 square feet N-46 The north side of Malaga from Church to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 19,843 square feet Hardscape area: 18,000 square feet N-47 The eastside of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to Brandywine. The paseo from Brandywine to Bunker Hill Drive. The eastside of Radcliff from Bunker to Malada. Ground Cover area: 17,838 square feet Hardscape area: 9,023 square feet N-48 The Church median from 750 feet east of Milliken to Malaga Ave. Ground Cover area: 5,554 square feet Hardscape area: 9,698 square feet FH-1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 36. FH-2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. FH-5 .The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr. to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. FH-6 The Foothill median from Masi Plaza to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P763 H-5 The Haven median from Foothill to Church. Ground Cover area: 6,216 square feet Turf area: 5,286 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 12,432 and the Turf improvement square footage is 10,572; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. H-6 Haven median from Church to Baseline. Ground Cover area: 5,306 square feet Turt area: 4,354 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 10,612 and the Turt improvement square footage is 8,708; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by LMD 36 H-7 The Haven median from Baseline to Southern Pacific railroad tracks. Ground Cover area: 2,980 square feet Turt area: 1,996 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 5,960 and the Turf improvement square footage is 3,992; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by LMD 36. VG-14 The Baseline median from Milliken to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Baseline and following the curb line to Kenyon. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground Cover area: 9,169 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvements are 80,287, 62,999 square feet for Turf and 44,826 square feet for Hardscape; however, due to the location of the improvements, LMD 4-R maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by LMD 2. VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Baseline. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Rochester to Ellena East. The Baseline Median from Rochester to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Baseline and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road. The turt and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 3,960 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvements are 58,5887, 57,306 square feet for Turf and 36,014 square feet for Hardscape; however, due to the location of the improvements, LMD 4-R maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Rochester to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by LMD 2. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012113 C Z a w a w ntla3lsaH~oa ~ w ~g S W z z ¢ ~<; U~~ y a O w U K -R• K O -I W K p a~ a~ Gf n o t y & z y a ~ n y > o gg C~~,~~ ~ F z d z z ° ~d a '" zx o ~< Ou9 m N z N _ m m z a ~Z ~ r ~ a ~ o a z z z d 2 0 w ~ y Q o Z a °a Z m N Y r Z ~ m ~ Z Ja ~ r o ~ ~ ° d ~ w ~ /~tl ~ N3NIllIW ° z z N r. ~ z d c ~ ° Z N z o o ~ , ~ M w z m z ~ ~ E O - o ~, z m o ,Y- a a ~ ° Y J °aa m o ~ J ~ Z In N z o 0 o - ^ ~ z ~ _ ~ N ~ N z m z ~ '~ ~ p . cP ue:cS : . _: O v. •c , €~€ :~ _ e .°gc:FF" S6s O `v E~ z N N z f z ° ^ • ye : _Cc°' v a~~a~e <<~..EvY ^ ° ` . Ae e ~F` SE;E~ I ' y Q e •S L _ j F r N O N bin E2 e~ aFE~ E- `4~ ~ e Atl N3~tlH P765 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012/13 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $612,420.00 Overtime Salaries 1,050.00 Part-time Salaries 32,280.00 Fringe Benefits 290.190.00 Subtotal Personnel $935,940.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $67,150.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 6,000.00 Emergency Equipment & Vehicle Rental 750.00 Equip Operations & Maint 3,750.00 Depreciation -Computer Equip 0.00 Contract Services 667,900.00 Tree Maintenance 32,000.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 2,910.00 Water Utilities 332,530.00 Electric Utilities 35,070.00 Assessment Administration 23,010.00 General Overhead ~ 132.490.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $1,303,560.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay -Vehicles 0.00 Capital Projects 5723.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $723,000.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $2,962,500.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,548,100.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (26.050.001 Total Estimated Revenues $2,522,050.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 440,450.00 Total Expenditure Budget $2,962,500.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,548,104.25 Total District EBU Count 6,574.05 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $360.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $387.95 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P766 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the property owners on December 2, 2009, voted in favor of a Prop 218 assessment ballot increase with an allowable annual increase by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain ari Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $2,754,040.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (440,450.00) Ooeratina Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2073 Reserve Fund Balance $2,313,590.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Frinoe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P767 Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: O~erating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P768 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include landscaping of Parkways and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P769 Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover), Paseos, Street Trees, and Parks -Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Terra Vista Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District; and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties withircthe District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined. On December 2, 2009 Proposition 218 assessment Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P770 ballot increase was approved by the property owners in this district. Therefore, all parcels included in the District boundary, are being levied in accordance with Article XIII D and Proposition 218. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi lier ' Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Condominium 0.80 Dwelling Unit Multi -Family 0.70 Dwelling Unit Commercial/ Industrial 3.25 Acre Vacant (incl. all undeveloped property) 0.25 Acre Schools 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $387.95 $380.00 2,652.00 2,652.00 Condominium $387.95 $380.00 1,395.00 1,116.00 Multi-family $387.95 $380.00 3,331.00 2,331.70 Commercial/Industrial $387.95 $380.00 176.28 572.91 Vacant $387.95 $380.00 96.30 24.06 Schools $387.95 $380.00 35.41 8.85 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2012113 P771 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost Of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2010/11, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2012/13 will not increase Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P772 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P77? `n CC ao I d' Imo V N 0 E cc ,,AA Q \IL ny tiiay0 O I �: c12 0—I In ! igit CD I `I� J CD m — . N r ca m LL Q 10 1 Co -o I I my epuem!33 Ay epuenn43 CD i Os CD ._ 0 18 Neei0 ea tr.= ny.io sayooa ny Jalsegaoa co ti J i ny ua�!p!W _.._.._.._.._ - ny ueN!!!!W 1 II ��; ny UBneH i ny uaneH i I Ay esowiaH 1 - _ ny esouneH i ntf P!eqoJy!y ! j N ' PIc!yaiy i , 1 ny uew!!aH r r ny uewlle- 7 W L 1 ,., L a 1 AV pie(au!n is ue!!aweO i `81€§1°�pf'l 1 stir EY:ily� i +r..'' • !!'s7.p gzz f�• I K •y� "gi 118= €I ,� _..r — ny emus '41;11:511; 4._, Co c m it in 1 . F4t ._.._..1.._.._.1_.._..r•.I 5 d L 2 W `:I.ft F.E Co N o 11P€fit 1 g rx c m LL < xrfiiifff Co 2 f: ( 7, C ESS.YePpf if N CO [!:1-1111d: •.'I a — m !IIiti!illui P774 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Count Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $387.95 2,652.00 2,652.00 $1,028,843.40 Condominium $387.95 1,395.00 1,116.00 $432,952.20 Multi-family ~ $387.95 3,331.00 2,331.70 $904,583.01 Commercial/Industrial $387.95 176.28 572.91 $222,260.43 Vacant $387.95 96.30 24:08 $9;341.83 Schools $387.95 35.41 8.85 $3,433.35 Property Type Count Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $380.00 2,652.00 2,652.00 $1,007,760.00 Condominium $380.00 1,395.00 1,116.00 $424,080.00 Multi-family $380.00 3,331.00 2,331.70 $886,046.00 Commercial/Industrial $380.00 176.28 572.91 $217,705.80 Vacant $380.00 96.30 24.08 $9,148.50 Schools $380.00 35.41 8.85 $3,363.95 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The fallowing Annexation is effective for the 2012113 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Annexation Total Total Property Type Parcel Number Date Pro'ect Units/Acres EBUs Count Use Code 1077-422-21, 22 04/06/11 TR 18782 192 Units 134.40 Multi-Family Residential and 1077-422-25 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P775 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) P776 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (TOT LOT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P777 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .................................................................:.......................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General .................................:.....................................................................................9 General Benefit ......~ ...................................................................................................9 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P778 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12- 097, aResolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and - NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012113 Total Estimated Assessment $4,980.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 1 090.00 Total Estimated Revenue $8,070.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 8 250.00 Total Expenditure Budget $14,320.00 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $113.29 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $113.29 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P779 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. 0 F SS10~i! ~~DREWST Fyn - FG9 m Mark ector of Engineering Services/City Engineer No. C053672 a Ezp.:6.30.1 3 Y Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P780 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative casts associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P781 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners.of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P782 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City bounded by Hermosa Avenue on the west, 26`" Avenue on the south, the parcels north of and along Bedford Drive and the parcels west of and along Andover Place. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Tot Lot. Site # Descriptive Location I-1-5 The tot lot on the southwest corner of Andover and Bedford. Ground Cover area: 1,506 square feet Turf area: 1,070 square feet Hardscape 640 square feet Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P783 d w F Z W a ~ w ~ z z ~ w O J O ~ Q J H H w ¢U' ~ Ca7 Y 1D O W U ~ H ~ ~ ~ W K 3~ a~ a~~ LL a O ~ ~( 1~ I ~ _ ~ ~ ow Z ~ ~r N ~ V •~ O) 5 0 M V w ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 N •~ 0 N ~ o a~- y a ~ ° J nvvsowa3H _ ~sa,~ a Pw cc°EF~no ~4 ' + i3peD°ca°c ~E~ - •~ ~es'o ii~i3c::$o V $e.n `e eaSSgaEn~gee Z sS3 F.^ss-Fb: VL U ~~==-;ose=-~sP~°F~a ~E:ei:F~ ° ~.~.,. P784 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2012/13 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $800.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 70.00 Contrail Services 12,340.00 Utilities Water Utilities 510.00 Electric Utilities 320.00 Assessment Administration 240.00 General Overhead 40.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $14,320.00 Capital Expenditures Caoital Proiecls 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $14,320.00 Total Estimated Assessment $4,980.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 1.090.00 Total Estimated Revenue $6,070.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 8.250.00 Total Expenditure Budget $14,320.00 Total Estimated Assessment $4,984.76 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $113.29 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $113.29 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P785 The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $78,640.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 8,250.00 Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance ~ $70,390.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract casts of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required far the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P786 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, acccunting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratina Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P787 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairty distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or paroels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of CaliforniaJ." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P788 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights- of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are.within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and. that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P789 method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit.("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type . determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $113.29 $113.29 44 44 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012113 P790 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 +.+ V •i + , N ~~ . .H J o O ~ ® c 1 ~ U u~ 0 ~ ~ ~`- - ny wa4~ Of ti J ti ~ ~ _ ; .._.._.._.._ ~ o ~ ~ m N ~ C po N A, ; W J d m - ~ O ~~ i f~ N ~ (b r 3 O '= i 1 - _ li _.._. _.._ • Q i _.. _.._.. in`dise3 in ® ~ i ny epueM!13 - ' ~ ny epuenn!33 i V ~ ~ i i ~9 ~aaf~ Red i /~ \_u_o_o_u_o_.._u' i ' 10 ny ~alsayooa !- J i i ny falsayooa ~..~ j 1 1 ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._.._ I ny ua~!II!W i i i i i i ny uaneH i i i my uaneH i ny esow~aH ~ - ~ i i ;ny esowfaH i i nH PIeQ!4o~d j ny PIeQ!4ofb' 1 ny uewllaH i ~•~'" ~ ny uewllaH j f° t r I ~ ! ny p e~(au v !n 3S ue!lawe~ ~ - i t ay t.._..l ' •~ ~ ~ „_r•Y.._.._~_.._.._r nd an01~ g e asf*§fi~~~~ ~ gji ~_. •~.•~' ' I• In ~ L J m - Q' 3 (n L g 4 E°j$ ~l1E' a'~a i4 ~i_ B E ~~ • • ~ m ° ~ E pY E y' ~Q v Q: c [D o ~ Q e 9 @ 99 gg f` p Eff ~ T N l - - - pp .! 99ee ~ll L '~i~°~C~~ ~~ 0 m {C ~~~~ ~~ = ~ ~ 9 B~ ~ y Le sef E ~ ~i $Ei ~~ e y8 $$ y p~~ g¢¢g p ~ d3 b. i~ ° " ~ a ¢ 9 b Ee~i~i~a8~e P792 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $113.29 44 44 $4,984.76 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Count Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $113.29 44 44 $4,984.76 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations . There were no annexations effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012113 P793 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) P794 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6-R (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P795 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................8 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 9 District .Budget ............................................................................................................ 9 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................10 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 12 Ge Hera I .........................................................................................................:...........12 General Benefit ........................................................................................................12 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................13 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................13 Cost Of Living Inflator ...............................................................................................15 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 16 ASSESSMENT ROLL 17 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................17 Annexations ..............................................................................................................17 P796 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12- 097, aResolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements far the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit. received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012113 Total Estimated Assessment $447,260.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 26 370.00 Total Estimated Revenue $420,890.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 27,970.00 Total Expenditure Budget $448,860.00 Total District EBU Count 1,196.98 Actual Assessment per EBU $373.66 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $382.15 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P797 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer s Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. PNpntwgp'Fy~, No.C053672G?' m Ezp.6.3i1.1 3 ~ Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P798 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of water far the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The Ciry Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P799 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article Xlll D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P800 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of the I-210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, west of Rochester Avenue and east of Milliken Avenue, also known as the Caryn Planned Community. The boundaries also include Tract No. 13835 east of Rochester Avenue and Tracts No. 13748, 13857 & 13858 west of Milliken Avenue. Zone 1 is the area generally located west of Rochester Avenue and east of Milliken Avenue. Zone 2 is the area generally located east of Rochester Avenue and west of Milliken Avenue. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trashldebris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriotive Location CC-1 The Southside of Banyan St. from 1290 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The west side of Milliken & median from Banyan St. to 292 south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 96,892 square feet Turf area: 17,945 square feet Hardscape area: 13,944 square feet CC-2 For information purposes: This site was deleted 7-1-00 and was combined with CC-1. CC-3 The paseo on the west side of Morning PI. from Morning PI. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,801 square feet Turf area: 124 square feet Hardscape area: 4,609 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R - Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P801 CC-4 The west side of Morning PI., from Banyan St. to Starview PI. The north side of Starview PI., from Morning PI. to Star View Ct. Ground Cover area: 14,273 square feet Turf area: 5,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,000 square feet CC-5 Silver Sun paseo fro m the end of Silver Sun cul-de-sac to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 25,890 square feet Turf area: 12,084 square feet Hardscape area: 1,350 square feet CC-6 The east and west side of Netherlands View Lcop from Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr. The Netherlands View Loop paseo from Netherlands View Loop to Mt Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 88,902 square feet Turf area: 676 square feet Hardscape area: 23,650 square feet CC-7 The east and west si de of Hillview Loop from Mt. Rainer Ct. to Kettle Peak. Ground Cover area: 14,930 square feet Turf area: 6,318 square feet Hardscape area: 12,236 square feet CC-8 The paseo from Hillview Loop to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 42,107 square feet Turt area: 22;752 square feet Hardscape area: 4,089 square feet CC-9 The south side of Vintage Dr. from 250 feet west of Hillview Loop to Hillview Loop. The west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr. to Kettle Peak. The west side of Kettle Peak from Hillview Loop to Donner Pass Ct. The east side of Hillview Loop from Kettle Peak to Tioga Peak. Ground Cover area: 47,334 square feet Turt area: 4,954 square feet Hardscape area: 9,088 square feet CC-10 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Butler Peak. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Rainbow Falls Ct. to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area:. 24,603 square feet Hardscape area: 10,760 square feet CC-11 The paseo from Caryn School to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St. from the paseo to Rochester Ave. The east and west side of Mt. Baldy Ct. from Banyan St. to Sierra Crest View Loop. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct. to Woodland Ct. Ground Cover area: 47,507 square feet Turf area: 7,810 square feet Hardscape area: 7,825 square feet CC-12 The Separation Paseo from Vintage Dr. to Pinnacle Peak. Ground Cover area: 50,325 square feet Turt area: 15,021 square feet Hardscape area: 7,675 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P802 CC-13 The east side of Hillview Loop from Tioga Peak Ct. to Vintage Dr. The south side of Vintage Dr. from Hillview Loop to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Hillview Loop to Caryn School. The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. San Antonia Ct. Ground Cover area: 26,162 square feet Turf area: 4,508 square feet Hardscape area: 12,928 square feet CC-14 The east side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly to Vintage Dr. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Sierra Crest View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Wilson Ct. The south side of Vintage Dr. from Netherlands View Loop to 330 feet west of Netherlands View Loop. Ground Cover area: 73,250 square feet Turf area: 16,525 square feet Hardscape area: 9,885 square feet CC-15 The south side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly Ct. to Mt. Cambridge Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Cambridge Ct. to Woodland Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct. to Caryn School. The Sierra Crest View Loop paseo from Sierra Crest View Loop to Mt. Sherman Ct. Ground Cover area: 70,990 square feet Turf area: 7,699 square feet Hardscape area: 20,055 square feet CC-16 The south side of Vintage Dr. from Netherlands View Loop to Rochester Ave. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Rochester Ave. to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Wilson Ct. to Mt. Cambridge Ct. The Netherlands View Loop Paseo from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 77,202 square feet Turf area: 3,954 square feet Hardscape area: 18,195 square feet CC-17 The east side of Milliken Ave. from Vintage Dr. to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 13,740 square feet Turf area: 9,088 square feet Hardscape area: 6,460 square feet CC-18 The north side of Vintage Dr. from Milliken Ave. to Hillview Loop. The south side of Vintage Dr. from 104 feet west of Hillview Loop.to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 32,287 square feet Turf area: 3,889 square feet Hardscape area: 11,188 square feet CC-19 The Terrace View Loop paseo from Vintage Dr. to Terrace View Loop. Ground Cover area: 17,496 square feet Turf area: 15,617 square feet Hardscape area: 2,736 square feet CC-20 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Mt. San Antonio Ct. to EI Capitan Ct. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Mt San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 20,627 square feet Turf area: 20,017 square feet Hardscape area: 7,888 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P803 CC-21 The west side of Rochester from Banyan to 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 31,292 square feet CC-22 The south side of Vintage Dr. from Terrace View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Rainer Ct. Ground Cover area: 11,609 square feet Turf area: 3,763 square feet Hardscape area: 6,524 square feet CC-23 The south side of Banyan from Milliken to Butler Peak PI. The west side of Butler Peak PI. from Banyan St. to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Rainbow Falls Ct. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet Hardscape area: 528 square feet CC-24 The north side of Terrace View Loop from EI Capitan Ct. to Butler Peak PI. The east side of Butler Peak PI. from Terrace View Loop to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St. from Butler Peak PI. to 990 feet east of Butler Peak PI. Ground Cover area: 14,452 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet CC-25 This site was moved to CC-13. This mainline was part of CC-13 and should not have been its own site. CC-26 The.east side of Rochester from 210 freeway to Vintage Dr. The north and south side of Vintage from to Rochester to Thunder Mountain Ct. The west side of Rochester from 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 35,037 square feet Hardscape area: 19,779 square feet CC-27 The Milliken median and the westside of Milliken from 292 feet south of Vintage to 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 13,365 square feet Hardscape area: 12,300 square feet CC-28 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to the 210 freeway right- of- way. Ground Cover area: 17,724 square feet Hardscape area: 8,197 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 a z ~ w Z w n- ~ w ~ z z ~ w ~ N ~ O J O J ~ ~ Q U ~ ~ W ~ H ~ ~ ~ W 0 ~ Q ~ U ~ ~ a ~ a ai ~ a ~ ~ i ~ ~~ U .~~ O / ~~ ~ U ~~// LL `_ 1 ~~ I Q (~ D Q ~ ~ Z Q J ~ ~ Z ~~ N U U ~ ~ U UI U N - U C=7 _ ~ C ~L i / ~• / O 1~` }i~ Z ~ ` ,~ N ~r~Z f~ ~ O 'r N w V C ' U of ~ °~U' N r ~a~-~in~ O~ ~~ ~ /~, A W ° J ~O U ~ O W N /^ M U U l .~ Q IO U ~~J _ 1 v / ~~ O z ~ O ~~ o ~ U a O ~ ~ ~ ,` LL ~ - ~ w ~- U U C ~J OU N ~ O J ~nV N3NI•l•IIW~ O O O wa w ~ o._ U V N 'r c @ uEuAE `o ° U U U U o c,c OHO - O L_cnUNCON E m o w c 10 0 v d a `0 € E~ n' o o y o v_ co `o-Bi $Cg n u c~ ~~C V y0~~C L~~N C O 6 O ry L ~ ~ ` 'l t ``N N ~ ~ c,s E .~ o n ~ O O q; E~~ g o v a u c_ ~.. of x 5 4L ~ ° N - U c >.o 0 a r~ q N~ R c 0 C p:C ~ ~ q_ c `rc'~ c 10u o d o a. m o o N~ cou~ `co~Ec c~=dE ~~m~a~m O ~L vmoavL a.ao°'y'q^ oo~ c U U O o r `-' E o E o, `m `m E m_?~ C m C ~ ~ _ a E n p~ a o ~ o o q w m~ t7 N °ctmo'9c "°u a2'o m$~ncQ~ y A N U aa. ¢ j N~ N v a s T L O~ d 0 0 E ~i d O g a L ~ -Ln i9 cm 6m' ~mm~3 ~~~~~an''~ P805 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012/13 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $7,230.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 3.400.00 Subtotal Personnel $10,630.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $10,760.00 Contract Services 276,200.00 Tree Maintenance 16,870.00 Utilities Water Utilities ~ - 100,260.00 Electric Utilities 7,300.00 Assessment Administration 7,020.00 General Overhead 19.820.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $438,230.00 Capital Expenditures Cauital Projects $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $448,860.00 Total Estimated Assessment $447,260.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (26.370.00) Total Estimated Revenues $420,890.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 27,970.00 Total Expenditure Budget $448,860.00 Total Estimated Assessment $447,262.32 Total District EBU Count 1,196.98 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $373.66 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $382.15 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the property owners on September 1, 2010, voted. in favor of a Prop 218 assessment ballot increase with an allowable annual increase by the lesser of 3.0% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U). Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P806 the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $127,110.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 ~ (27,970.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $99,140.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of'the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and mariagement of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P807 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012113 P808 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P809 Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights- of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P810 Vacant parcels are assigned an EDU value of 0.25 EDU's per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. Publicly owned school parcels are also assigned an EDU value of 0.25 EDU's per acre in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements which are provided for the use and benefit of the residential units within the District, and the benefit conferred upon other parcels within the District by the open space and landscaping maintained by the School District on their parcels which might be used by properties within the District under joint use agreements between the School District and the City. There are two benefit zones within the District: Zone 1 and Zone 2. Parcels in Zone 2 are assigned 0.75 EDU per dwelling unit due to the reduction in special benefit they receive as a result of their location relative to the majority of the improvements maintained by the District. Zone 2 parcels are on the far east and west side of the District. Therefore, parcels within Zone 2 do not receive the same special benefit from the improvements due to their proximity, as parcels within Zone lwhich are assigned 1.00 EDU per dwelling unit and are generally located adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential -Zone 1 1.00 Dwelling Unit Single Family Residential -Zone 2 0.75 Dwelling Unit School 0.25 Acre or portion thereof Vacant 0.25 Acre or portion thereof The use of the latest County Assessor s Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential -Zone 1 $382.15 $373.66 963.00 963.00 Single Family Residential -Zone 2 $382.15 $373.66 310.00 232.50 School $382.15 $373.66 5.35 1.3375 Vacanl $382.15 $373.66 0.54 0.1350 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P811 Cost Of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2011/12, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.0% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2012/13 will increase from $366.00 to $373.66 per single-family residence Zone 1 and from $274.50 to $280.25 per single family residence Zone 2, a CPI increase of 2.09% as compared to Fiscal.Year 2011/12. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P812 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2012/13 ~ N tp N •_ ~ N C ~ N `FI Q ~ ~ h y ~. O N c c Q ny /~~ay~ ~ U ~ N N O ~ ~• ~ ~ C C .1 ~ 1 J _ m ~ ^ 1 ry N c L ~ m ~ i O `~ ~ _ 1 L Q ~ ' _.._.. 'nb';se3 in ~ a pny epuenn!33 ny epuenn!33 G1 i Q i V X18 ~aa~~ ea ny ~alsayoob = ny ~alsayoob J ~ ~~ ny ua~!II!W ~ -.._.._.._.. ny ua~!II!W i i ny uaneH ~ ~ ny uaneH i ny esow~aH _ ny esow~aH i nV PIe9!4o~H : nb' Ple4!yo~y i ny uewllaH i N. "L ny uewllaH i ,/ P' t ~ ny p e~(au!n 3S uepawe~ ~ ~~~~e'@as°e ~~3~ ziE~~yz r.._.._ . ~ '~ ;-.y EEr 336 ~'~~$p s ~ , .,_ ~'• ~ ny anal $ ~ ~ ~ M1_• r ~ ~ ~•• L . J m ~ 3 ~ t g ~5~~ ~P~~x 4~e~~isg e$ l - ~ O ~ i U d' N m O LL Q ~ s 8 'zi e, g~e~i•°E= 'z ~ C s ~ i€'~i O N m et p~9 g ~s B y EJ 4pE3 = V ~£ y ~~ d$s@ega eyySS~ 8 E 8 ~~ p~g q Ea5p E ~g$.u PF_ U ~ e Exko~iE ,iSe P814 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential -Zone 1 $382.15 963.00 963.00 $368,010.454 Single Family Residential -Zone 2 $382.15 310.00 232.50 $88,849.88 School $382.15 5.35 1.3375 $511.13 Vacant $382.15 0.54 0.1350 $51.59 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single~FamilyResidenlial-Zone1 $373.66 963.00 963.00 $359,834.58 Single Family Residential -Zone 2 $373.66 310.00 232.50 $86.877.50 School $373.66 5.35 1.3375 $499.80 Vacant $373.66 0.54 0.1350 $50.45 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2012113 P815 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) P816 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P817 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment ............................................................................................ Process for Annual Assessment ................................................................................ PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 3 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................9 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 10 District Budget ..........................................................................................................10 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................11 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 13 Genera I ............................................................................. ........................................13 General Benefit ................................................................ ........................................13 Special Benefit ................................................................. ........................................14 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................14 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 16 17 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................17 Annexations ..............................................................................................................17 P818 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12 - 097, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received: and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012113 Total Estimated Assessment $860,970.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 18 150.00 Total Estimated Revenue $842,620.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 174 180.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,077,000.00 Total District EBU Count 2,741.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $307.05 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $307.05 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P819 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. NtPC1159672 '~ 1~ f) Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Ez , 5.30•,1 3 J Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P820 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City canriot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment . district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on.file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P821 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among-other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P822 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by the 210 Freeway on the south, I-15 on the east, and City limits on the north. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Etiwanda Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location EN-1 The North side of Wilson from San Sevaine to Ridgeline: The Eastside of Ridgeline from Wilson to Arcadia, the south side of Arcadia from Ridgeline to 77 feet east of Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 27,325 square feet Turf area: 19,334 square feet Hardscape area: 840 square feet EN-2 The Metropolitan Water District easement on the south side of Crescents Way from San Marino to Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet Turf area: 41,250 square feet Hardscape area: 9,000 square feet EN-3 The Wilson Median from Wardman Bullock to San Sevaine. Ground Cover area: 9,016 square feet Hardscape area: 11, 088 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P823 EN-4 The Planters on the north side of the drainage easement that is between and parallel to Highland and Arapaho east of Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet EN-5 The south side of Wilson from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine to 205 feet east of San Sevaine. The Landscape east of San Sevaine from 24th to south end tract. Ground Cover area: 45,584 square feet Turt area: 3,527 square feet EN-6 The north side of Wilson from Wardman Bullock to Ridgeline. The west side of Ridgeline from Wilson to 120 feet north of Arcadia. Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet Turf area: 15,136 square feet Hardscape area: 1,300 square feet EN-7 The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock from 24th street to 857 feet north of Glendora. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood wall will be handled as extra for debris pickup and weed control on an as needed basis. Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet Hardscape area: 31,549 square feet EN-8 The south side of Crescenta Way from Ridgeline to Crestline. Ground Cover area: 50,305 square feet Turf area: 35,960 square feet Hardscape area: 10,000 square feet EN-9 The paseo from Meadow Brook to Rock Creek Road. Ground Cover area: 1,400 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 2,820 square feet EN-10 The paseo from Etiwanda to North Rim Way. The west side of Etiwanda from 175 feet north of North Rim Way to 171 feet south of Golden Prairie Drive. Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet Turf area: 4,445 square feet Hardscape area: .13,026 square feet EN-11 The paseo south of Ridge Crest Drive to southern boundary of Tract 14139. This site is temporarily maintained by another contractor and was deleted from the contract as of 7- 16-01, however, this site is still the city's property. Ground Cover area: 3,548 square feet Turt area: 800 square feet Hardscape area: 4,280 square feet EN-12 The cul-de-sac on the north side of Ridgecrest at Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,870 square feet Turf area: 700 square feet Hardscape area: 450 square feet EN-13 The east side of San Sevaine from Wilson to 136 feet north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 46,611 square feet Turf area: 5,037 square feet EN-14 The west side of San Sevaine from 150' north of Wilson to 136' north of Crescenta. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P824 Ground Cover area: 55,166 square feet Turt area: 235 square feet Hardscape area: 6,975 square feet EN-15 The north side of Youngs Canyon Road from 500 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The south side of Youngs Canycn Road from 349 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The east and west side of Koch place from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet north of Youngs Canyon Road. The west side of Koch from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road. The east side of Koch from 82 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road to Youngs Canyon Road. The trailhead north east of the east end of Youngs Canyon Rcad to the south end of San Sevaine Horse Trail. The south end of San Sevaine Horse from the trail head to 254 feet north of trailhead. Ground Cover area: 42,925 square feet Hardscape area: 14,308 square feet EN-16 The east side of Wardman Bullock from 225 feet south of San Segundo Drive to 80 feet north of Dona Way. Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet Hardscape area: 3,450 square feet EN-17 The north side of Colonberc from Sah Sevaine Channel to Guides Drive. The south side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to 400 feet north of Guides Drive. The north side of Aggazzotti from Colonbero to 475 feet east of Colonbero. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained by city personnel. Ground Cover area: 43,241 square feet Hardscape area: 29,125 square feet EN-18 The north side of Aggazzotti Road from San Antonio Drive to San Sevaine Road. The west side of San Sevaine road from Aggazzotti to 702 feet south of Aggazzotti. The East side of San Sevaine Road from 702 feet south of Aggazzotti to Regina. Ground Cover area: 47,823 square feet Hardscape area: 30,986 square feet EN-19 The south side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet Hardscape area: 19,229 square feet EN-20 The east side of Bluegrass from 190 feet south of Vista Verde Dr. to Wilson Avenue. The south side of Wilson Avenue from Bluegrass Avenue to Estates Way Ground Cover area: 85,155 square feet Hardscape area: 48,784 square feet EN-21 The north side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Wilson median from Etiwanda To Cervantes. The Westside of Etiwanda From Wilson To Del Norte Place. Ground Cover area: 88,795 square feet Hardscape area: 27,128 square feet EN-22 The north and south side of Vintage from 165 feet east of Country View to 338 feet west of Country View. Ground Cover area: 13,603 square feet Hardscape area: 7,365 square feet EN-23 The north side of Wilson and median from Etiwanda west to Etiwanda. The eastside of Etiwanda from Wilson to 1150 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet Hardscape area: 29,567 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P825 EN-24 The north side of Vintage from 360 feet west of Ascot to 230 feet east of Countrywood. Ground Cover area: 34,707 square feet Hardscape area: 92,600 square feet EN-25 The eastside of Bluegrass from Banyan to 610 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,054 square feet Hardscape area: 5,819 square feet EN-26 The south side of Banyan from Bluegrass to Greenwood. Ground Cover area: 6,240 square feet Hardscape area: 3,200 square feet EN-27 The south side of Banyan from Laurel Blossom to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 1,703 square feet Hardscape area: 8,417 square feet EN-28 The north side of Wilson from Cervantes to 1715 feet west of Cervantes. The west side of Cervantes from Carmel Knolls Drive to Wilson. The paseo from Wilson to Tejas Ct. The median on Wilson from Cervantes to Bluegrass. The following temporary landscape: There is 1 planter on the west side of Altura at Tejas. There are five planters on the south side of Tejas from Altura to 195 feet east of Altura. Ground Cover area: 25,048 square feet Hardscape area: 22,532 square feet EN-29 The south side of Banyan from 787 feet west of East Av. to East Av...The west side of East Avenue from Banyan to 600 feet south of Blue Gum. The east side of East Ave. from Banyan to 537 feet south of Banyan. Ground cover area: 16,111 square feet Hardscape area: 15,774 square feet EN-30 The east side of Bluegrass Ave from 257 feet south of Churchill Drive to 418 feet north of Churchill Drive. Ground Cover area: 9,303 square feet Hardscape area: 5,302 square feet EN-31 The south side of Banyan Ave. from 375 feet south of Cashew Way to Rose Way. The north side of Banyan Ave. from 435 feet west of Peak PI. to Wardman Bullock Rd. Ground cover area: 53,000 square feet Hardscape area: 26,855 square feet EN-32 The landscaping south of the equestrian trail from 210 feet west of Grovewood PI. to 1,170 feet east of Grovewood PI. Ground cover area: 6,900 square feet EN-33 The north side of Youngs Canyon Rd. from 600 feet east of Banyan Ave. to Banyan Ave. The east side of Wardman Bullock Rd. from Banyan Ave. to Wilson Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave. from Wardman Bullock Rd. to 635 feet east of Fields PI. Ground cover area: 66,601 square feet Hardscape area: 46,332 square feet EN-34 The west side of Wardman Bullock Rd. from Wilson Ave. to Banyan Ave. Parkview Way from Wardman Bullock Rd. to Soledad Way. Ground cover area: 56,314 square feet Hardscape area: 28,428 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P826 EN-35 The north side of Day Creek Blvd. from Etiwanda Ave. to Indian Wells Place. Ground cover area: 160,737 square feet Hardscape area: 128,254 square feet EN-36 The south side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Day Creek to 170 feet north of North Rim. The hydro seeded landscape area inside the catch basin on the corner of Day Creek and Etiwanda. The west side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Indian Wells. Ground cover area: 58,398 square feet Hardscape area: 68,127 square feet EN-37 The east side of East Av. from 235 feet south of Hunt Club Dr. to 375 feet north of Hunt Club Dr. Ground cover area: 5,559 square feet Hardscape: 5,231 square feet EN-38 The west side of East Ave. from 236 feet north of Philly Dr. to 245 feet south of Philly Dr. Ground cover area: 4,605 square feet Hardscape area: 3,394 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turt areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P827 °d o °d: ~ z ~ S o S ~ w a ~ a W Z F 7 W ~y W O O ~ > ~ s~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^o O w m ¢ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ Q a~~ LL a ~y s O ^O 6 I ' ~ B M1 • O ~ w M z W < y w _ j ~i z o ~~ o n - N *~ / y W W W N ~~ V1 •~ n w /W w ~~N yr ~V// ~ ~w ~ b W „~ M W~ i W •~ W W ' UI 4 ~~Ol 1 f19 NVWO ?JVM a i w z W W a i' ` ~ ~ z ~ N o ai `l C N ~ • L ~ a Z °° w w z ¢ ~ ¢ m m Atl 1Stl3 0 ~ /~~ W ~ ~ 3 m N W z N = N S ~ O O N r Z 3 LL ~tltlONtlM113 c W N w ~tltlaNVMil3 W Atl tlONVM113 7 wv w ~ J .,,, = Oi W 4 ~~ W W Wy 2 N ~ ~ W ry Z Z W W 2 W rv W Z Z Z W 2 W ~ _ W i i 6 ° j: a4#~~e~~~f ~.~g l8 )13321') AtlO ¢ $a Ef. ~=%s~ek$6$e z ~ ~ ~a~~aFa~9 e FS$a E •r ~ o ~ 2 ~ ' 77 € g [5a~.a::E9Ea~ F yy~t r •F9 t e ~ z, ~ O v U , N = . g~e ty x .• 4~2 Ff ~~{~I-[ 5 tp iei ~~ E Cis ..• 5• ;~ e [sic'€~j2~£F@iFff€= ,i (J y ?::t lii BEC38E~es'~e P828 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012113 Bud et Personnel Services Re ular Salaries $171 000.00 Pad-time Salaries 10,380.00 Frin a Benefits 81 050.00 Subtotal Personnel $282,430.00 O erations and Maintenance O erations andMaintenance - $46,660.00 O erations and Maintenance Facilities 1,000.00 Vehicle O erations and Maintenance 2,500.00 Contract Services 301,930.00 Tree Maintenance 6,950.00 Utilities Tele hone Utilities 1,500.00 Water Utilities 295,540.00 Electric Utilities 23,840.00 Assessment Administration 15,080.00 General Overhead 59 570.00 Subtotal O erations and Maintenance $754,570.00 Ca ital Ex enditures Ca ital Pro'ects 0.00 Subtotal Ca ital Ex enditures $0.00 Total District Ex enditure Bud et $1,017,000.00 Total Estimated Assessment $860,970.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 18 150.00 Total Estimated Revenue $642,820.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 174 180.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,017,000.00 Total Estimated Assessment $841,620.00 Total District EBU Count 2,741.00 Actual Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $307.05 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $307.05 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 199ti/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P829 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $836,720.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (174,180.00) Ooeratina Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/73 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $662,540.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Ooerations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to pertorm maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within.the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012113 P830 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratina Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P831 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which (airly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement' (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P832 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights- of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress far parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1989, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P833 method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type (County Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $307.05 $307.05 2,804 2,804 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P834 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2012/13 r©3: N. al to Sr CI 'i r N + E >itl. o � 0 �. N �if Ay J(JJay° CCi -• • ti N 1 N N C ci G ■ CO o 2 M ._.._.._.. .._.a.._.._.._, Ay 3se3 in AA,, i L Tr 4 3°T;t.w.i AV epuenny3 v t Nil Nt ; CO A V 1918914001:1 i J ! i AV Ja;sayooa i i1 i AV ua>I!II!W f._.._.._.._.._.._ �I I - i Ay ua>I!II!W i i i I \ V/ i ny uaneH II my uaneH i i AV esowJaH i '1 my esowJaH i ! AV PIe9!4oJy I ;Ay Ple4!y3Jb' i Ay uewllaH i --- — - .....e..-15 Ay uewllaH i I ( t v / !Ay PJeAau!n is ue!laweo i i i �.•I•• V.._` g6�.y ! 4l 1 1,„ti £ .f r.._..� •� .._�•Y.._.._—_ _ _r Ay 9AOJ0 tiara; 1..7bi ._.5 •'.I'••',.'' L J m 3. .L ri£ a €a°811$1€ -0 • (n co o Q _g !E1�gii€ cc a m i$ 8;E ?it' d N m fS¢�.3°e'fa E tg r. a ?in E9ag€E laa15 / E 4Sis&E4 ti se P836 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The fallowing tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 2,804 2,804 $860,968.20 Actual Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 .2,804 2,804 $860,968.20 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Number Annexation Date Pro'ect Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Property Type Coun Use Code 0225-191-12 03/02/2011 TR 17651 56 SFD 56.00 Single-Family Residential 0226-102-02 03/02/2011 TR 18708 7 SFD 7.00 Single-Family Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P837 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P838 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 cITY courtclL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P839 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................6 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget ............................................................................................................7 Definitions of Budget Items ..........:..............................................................................8 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 General ............................................................................. ........................................10 General Benefit ................................................................ ...........:............................10 Special Benefit ................................................................. ........................................11 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 13 14 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................14 Annexations ..............................................................................................................14 P840 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12- 097, aResolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate,of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscat Year 2012/13 Total Estimated Assessment $28,620.00 Less Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 200.00 Total Estimated Revenue $28,420.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 1 660.00 Total Expenditure Budget $30,080.00 Total District EBU Count 189.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $151.45 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P841 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"). 'P DREWSr~`Fy~ No. C053172 ~ 9 Ezp.6~3a 1 3 ~ Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P842 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P843 The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity.for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to _ enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is . found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P844 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as South Etiwanda, which is south of the I-210 Freeway along Fisher Drive, east of East Avenue, including the south side of Highstone Manor Court, the south side of Smokestone Street, and to the San Bernardino County Flood Control drainage basin on east side. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surtacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location SE-1 The east side of East Ave. from 480 feet south of Catalpa St. to 182 feet north of Catalpa St. The north and south side of Catalpa St. from East Ave. to Brownstone PI. Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet Turf area: 6,258 square feet Hardscape area: 4,050 square feet SE-2 The south side of Fis her Dr. from 361 feet east of East Ave. to 210 feet east of Starstone PI. Ground Cover area: 9,366 square feet Hardscape area: 4,074 square feet SE-3 The south side of Fis her Dr. from 860 feet west of Mulberry St. to Mulberry St. Ground Cover area: 3,676 square feet Hardscape area: 6,910 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P845 Total Ground Cover: 23,397 square feet Total Turf: 6,258 square feet Total Hardscape: 15,034 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P846 a ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ w r w a ~ m w `nom ~ w Z Z ? ~ ~ ~g~ ~ O J O m ~ ~ W ~! w C7 ~ C7 Y O W U ~'6 >F ~ W ~ d' O Q W 2 fir > ~ LL ~ d ~ ~ LL d O ~ / % I ,~ I /Z K O 2 [A h N Op ~9 N O Z ~Ir V .~ ~1.[ .y O~ a~ .., G C ~ ~ G ~ o N F G1 d ~ O C O ~ ~w0, - O W ~ y R N N o a = O o W U J > N O. LL O N ~8d5(g €B ~f EFe`pae~iYO.9i ~pA gas. a°'E t~5$%6°a` :J~aas ~,\6gl1F lie 'ssiS;oa s'gEfin SS pie fiFFaP }r /~Y lSV3 s4^yc`A a'i :3eE,e E;d < > e~ S 99 of < .%i,3~4$Eel ese:n: V $ ~ g`@a ~; B~ia ~16yE ~~ep!z U € i p U ~ ~El~tS€§zE~3~&dt~E P847 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012/13 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries Part-time Salaries Fringe Benefits Subtotal Personnel Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental Contract Services Tree Maintenance Utilities Water Utilities Electric Utilities Assessment Administration General Overhead Subtotal Operations and Maintenance Capital Expenditures Capital Projects Subtotal Capital Expenditures Total District Expenditure Budget Total Estimated Assessment Less Anticipated Delinquency Penalty Total Estimated Revenue Plus Reserve Fund Contribution Total Expenditure Budget Total Estimated Assessment Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $1,450.00 0.00 680.00 $2,130.00 $1,000.00 0.00 9,260.00 4,300.00 6,470.00 910.00 1,040.00 4,970.00 $27,950.00 0.00 $0.00 $30,080.00 $28,620.00 2( 00.00) $28,420.00 1.660.00 $30,080.00 $28,620.00 189.00 $151.45 $151.45 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1989/90, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P848 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated casts of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $55,470.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 1,660.00 Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $53,810.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the casts and expenses included in the District Budget: Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to pertorm maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Landscape Maintenance District No. S -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P849 Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratina Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due.to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P850 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P851 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights- of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 - Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P852 A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type (County Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $151.45 $151.45 189.00 189.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P853 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 ao •1r ~ ~ V ~~ w _ J 0 c j Q ~ U ~ ® in ~ ~ ~ ny ~(JJay~ 0 rn ti V ~ i ; .._.._.._.._ ~ J 1.r o / / •y i ~ N f- r C ~ i J ° ' m ~ o 1 ~ m t 3 a G • _ ~ m lL Q ~ 5 i - ._.._.._.._....._.._.._.._. ~ i nb' lse3 in i ® i L ~ i ny epuenn!33 ' ~ ny epuenn!33 V i ~ i H i _ ~8 ~aaJ~ e4 ~ C ._.._.._.._.._.._.._..~ i (C J... ny Jalsayooa ~- i i ny Jalsayooa ~..i j 1 j ny ua~!II!W r._.._.._.._.._ _ -_` i ny ua~!II!W i i i i i i ny uaneH ~ ~ i -- my uaneH i i ~ _ ny esowlaH ~ !ny esowlaH i i n e o1 y pl Q!y H ~ jnb' Ple4!4o1H i i ny uewllaH i - ~y.•r' ~ ny uewllaH ~ r'' L t i fi v • co i ny pJe~(au!n iS ue!lawe~ ~ -- - - i y ~+ nd aAOJ~ afa-~~ a~ A D! c m li Q = y~~g i ~ar~ v C = ~ ( g G S?Y ~~j ~6g .N m ~ d p26~ £ei i~ 6$Cppy3 { M p d44a 4S~£~E?. ~ E"°5~2s~FEne~ ~aa~3easa~~~ "~~"~~ ,. ,r daafsn° S;EE f£3o ~'~Ete 8 8 8 E€ ~~ s ea ga f P855 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 189.00 189.00 $28,624.05 Actual Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 189.00 189.00 $28,624.05 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P856 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) P857 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P858 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .........:.......................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................7 District Budget ............................................................................................................8 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 11 General .....................................................................................................................11 General Benefit ........................................................................................................11 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................12 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................12 Maximum and Historical Assessments .....................................................................13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 15 16 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................16 Annexations ..............................................................................................................16 P859 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12- 097, aResolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The fallowing table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2012/13 Total Estimated Assessment $378,780.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 37 670.00 Total Estimated Revenue $416,450.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 305 320.00 Total Expenditure Budget ~ $721,770.00 Total District EBU Count 2,025.56 Actual Assessment per EBU $167.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $527.03 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P860 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law'). `- •rG V~ No. C059012 ~ Exp. 6.90.1 3 ~ ~~ ~~Q. Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P861 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of .the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P862 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support far, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P863 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the. administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Lower Etiwanda, which south of Victoria Street, north of Foothill Boulevard, generally east of Etiwanda Avenue and the I-15 freeway and west of East Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are tfiroughout the Caryn Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order tc lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Garcia Park (formerly known as South Etiwanda Park). Site # Descriptive Location 9-1 The west side of East Ave. from 380 feet north of Chateau to 290 feet south of Chateau. Ground Cover area: 4,426 square feet Hardscape area: 7,360 square feet 9-2 The west side of East Ave. from 339 feet north of Brookfield to 157 feet north of Brookfield. Brookfield from East Ave. to Oak Crest. The east side of Oak Crest to 137 feet north of Brookfield. Ground Cover area: 2,390 square feet Hardscape area: 6,874 square feet 9-3 The west side of East Ave. from 790 feet north of Highfield to 256 feet south of Highfield. Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet Hardscape area: 10,669 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P864 9-4 The west side of East Ave. From 295 feet north of Via Veneto To Via Veneto. The north side of Via Veneto From East Ave to Dolcetto. The east side of Dolcetto from Via Veneto to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from 372 feet west of Dolcetto to 240 feet east of Dolcetto. The west side of Dolcetto from Miller to Garcia. The north side of Garcia from Dolcetto to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 48,612 square feet Hardscape area: 28,746 square feet 9-5 The north side of Miller from 429 feet west of Dolcetto to 1029 feet west of Dolcetto Ground Cover area: 6,519 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet 9-6 The north side of Miller From 254 feet east of Dolcetto to 167 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 4,089 square feet Hardscape area: 2,854 square feet 9-7 The south side of Lima, from 167 feet west of Brisas, to Green Glen. Ground Cover area: 2,580 square feet 9-8 The south side of Baseline from Etiwanda Av. to Shelby. The Baseline median from Etiwanda to 473 feet east of Shelby. Ground cover area: 16,395 square feet Hardscape area: 14,558 square feet 9-9 The north side of Candlewood St from Exbury St to Etiwanda Avenue. Ground Cover area: 3,362 square feet Hardscape area: 786 square feet 9-10 The north side of Baseline from 522 feet east of Forester to 180 feet west of Forester. The Baseline median from 503 feet east of Forester to 200 feet west of Forester. Ground cover area: 16,930 square feet Hardscape area: 13,600 square feet 9-11 The north side of Mueller Ct. from 40 feet past the east end of Mueller Ct. to 20 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground cover area: 9,420 square feet Hardscape area: 742 square feet 9-12 The north and south sides of Highland Av. from 217 feet west of Norcia Dr. to 210 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground cover area: 12,471 square feet Hardscape area: 14,445 square feet 9-13 The south side of Carnesi Dr. from Etiwanda Av. to 395 feet east of Murietta Ct. Ground cover area: 8,919 square feet Hardscape area: 6,203 square feet FH-17 The Foothill Blvd. median from Etiwanda Av. to Cornwell Av. Ground cover area: 8,275 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P865 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P866 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 N Improvement Map n IQ 0 QQ O~ nh/ CHURCH ST ~n~xa Q WATER METER C IRRIGATION PUMP 5 - ~ PE TRAIL IRRIGATION LINE PARKS LMD 9 Boundary MAJOR STREET FREEWAY PARCELS Tne mspa, Geh ene geogrepnic lnlormallon l'InbrmeLOn'I vaiYOle Oy ene lnroug"1"e Clty olPanM° Cuu monge u preaenlee n e W nl¢ re[om<e ol9.nenl Nbrma(wn ~ 8 Tne Ciry al flenMO Cummonge makes nor Mpliea na reply. /epr.aenYlien °r guarantee es to l.e mrilinl, sepuence.edurery<amplelaneaa ort~mefnes[ of eny Mipmemn pmvGee to you perm. in° usa am We nd rely FH-171S IN LMD 9,BUT °pa"""l"b'r"•°°"1°""r°"°^,m i[a~/.d.am MAINTAINED BY MARIPOSA p.naenur nrh •nr •ne.n mr°mr.mn preaemW n.re~ m. cm olfl."c"ecmm°"ga.:pwty a.e wumw,rml aiad.M.."n.n en r.prmemd~[."a warr.mna. i"aor eut nm rmnee m, me mpnee wmames or memnenlelMey e nme[s mr a p.nkmer purpo[e. me cly of Fancno aroma anon ^.mm~c<•vt °or.n..rre ."y q.dlny. req.reiesa om o"mr ul a"r •"ora, em .e iei k' a a nmm =~m s a r orm.u°n prova.e em 1 n r i " l w oa° nng a°e to env p•r.o^e rep.^=. up°° m. mbrm.m^ P867 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012/13 Bud et Personnel Services Re ular Salaries $156,090.00 "Part-time Salaries 7,860.00 Frin a Benefits 73 980.00 Subtotal Personnel $237,930.00 O erations and Maintenance O erations and Maintenance $52,750.00 O & M/Com uter E ui ment 2,430.00 CellularTechnolo ~ 1,080.00 Emer enc E ui ment and Vehicle Rental 1,200.00 Contract Services 333.440.00 Tree Maintenance 26,050.00 Utilities Water Utilities 27,550.00 Electric Utilities 8,730.00 Assessment Administration 8,750.00 General Overhead 21 860.00 Subtotal O erations and Maintenance $483,840.00 Ca ital Ex enditures Ca ital Pro'ects 0.00 Subtotal Ca ital Ex enditures $0.00 Total District Ex enditure Bud et $721,770.00 Total Estimated Assessment $378,780.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 37 670.00 Total Estimated Revenue $416,450.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 305 320.00 Total Expenditure Budget $721,770.00 Total Estimated Assessment $378,780.00 Total District EBU Count 2,025.56 Actual Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $187.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $527.03 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P868 and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $2,648,480.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (305,320.00) Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $2,343,160.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and ,other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2012/13 _ P869 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P870 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a Ibt or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement' (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P871 landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout Rancho Etiwanda and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within Rancho Etiwanda. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within Rancho Etiwanda which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within Rancho Etiwanda and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P872 type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Non-Residential Improved 2.00 Acre Vacant Property 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to bean invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table reflects both the maximum allowable assessment and the actual assessment rates for each year since the formation of the district and the proposed assessment rate for fiscal year 2012/13 for the District: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment er EBU Actual Assessment er EBU 2000/01 $375.91 $375.91 2001/02 388.02 375.91 2002/03 398.81 375.91 2003/04 414.44 375.91 2004/05 421.71 375.91 2005/06 438.67 375.91 2006/07 459.15 375.91 2007/08 476.76 387.94 2008/09 492.41 387.94 2009110 492.41 387.94 2010/11 501.55 387.94 2011 /12 516.58 187.00 2012113 527.37 187.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special beneft received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P873 Cost Of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2002/2003, the amount of the assessment for the District has increased each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2012/13 will not increase. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P874 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2012113 o~ y.+ V .~ y.. .y ¢' O ~ V ~ j`_ I C ~ ~ a i ny epuenn!33 ~ i V i V! i ~8 ~aa~~ ~(ed ~ ny ~alsayooa J .- i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._..-- - ny wa4~ v D! d C _ J m ~ N ~ 3 ~ 0 m o a ~ LL ~~ ® ~' 0 0 pN N 0 ny uaneH ny esow~aH nb, Plealy~~y ny uewllaH I lS uellawe~ J ~+' Q ~ . U ~ ~ ^~ J ti•r L ny lse3 ~ .._.._ . j- . ~ ny epuenng3 ny ialsayooa I ny ua~lll!W jny uaneH i -- i ny esow~aH i j nt1 Pley!4o~y i ~.~" ~ ny uewllaH /r• L a ny p e~(auln ny anal .... •~ .~. cn ~ ~ m ~ , I' t J ?~ L .. '~• W N N L O a0 ~ ~ ~ O Q Q: C m LL d ~ C N (0 (~ r ~~ ~e ~ ~~ P876 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $527.03 932.00 932.00 $491,191.96 Multi-Family Residential 527.03 1,057.00 1,057.00 557.070.71 Non-Residentiallmproved 527.03 18.28 36.56 19,268.22 Vacant Property 527.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 2,007.28 2,025.56 $1,067,530.69 Property Type (County Use Code Actual. Assessment'Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $187.00 932.00 932.00 $174,284.00 Multi-Family Residential 187.00 1,057.00 1,057.00 197,659.00 Non-Residentiallmproved 187.00 18.28 36.56 6,836.72 Vacant Property 187.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 2,007.28 2,025.56 $378,779.72 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexation is effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Annexation Total Total Property Type Parcel Number Date Pro'ect Units/Acres EBUs Coun Use Code 0227-131-03, OS 01/18/12 TR 18806 33 SFD 33.00 Single-Family Residential and 0227-131-62 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P877 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) P878 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P879 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .....:.......................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ..................................................:............5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................:...............5 Map of Improvements ...........................................................................................:.....7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 8 District Budget .................................................................:..........................................8 Definitions of Budget Items ............................................:............................................9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 15 16 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................16 Annexations ..............................................................................................................16 P880 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 12 - 097, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/13 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operatiohs and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received: and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2072/13 Total Estimated Assessment $462,770.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 1 030.00 Total Estimated Revenue $461,740.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 159 360.00 Total Expenditure Budget $621,100.00 Total District EBU Count 751.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $616.20 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $811.01 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this.Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P881 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"). Nc. C0595T2 ~ Exp. fr3tr 1 ~ CiV1~ cnQ~F Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012113 P882 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levv of an assessment for the fiscal vear referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P883 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the assessment district a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the district and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the,Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P884 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Rancho Etiwanda, which lies north of Highway 210, east of Day Creek Channel, and west of Hanley Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout Rancho Etiwanda. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Day Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location 10-1 The west side of Day Creek from 790 feet north of Richfield to Wilson. The north side of Wilson from Day Creek to 227 feet west of Day Creek. This site overlaps 10-2. Ground Cover area: 16,941 square feet Hardscaoe area: 3,589 square feet 10-2 The north and south side of Wilson from 497 feet west of Alvarado to Day Creek with 1 station at top of highest retaining wall on corner of Wilson and Day Creek. This station overlaps site 10-1. The south side of Wilson from Day Creek to Bluegrass. The Wilson median from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 47,275 square feet Hardscape area: 6,444 square feet 10-3 The west side of Day Creek from Wilson to 144 feet south of Clydesdale. The Day Creek median from Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 32,619 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P885 Hardscape area: 10,983 square feet 10-4 The east side of Day Creek from 648 feet south of Keenland to Wilson. Ground Cover area: 15,952 square feet Hardscape area: 4,365 square feet 10-5 The west side of Bluegrass from Wilson to 705 feet south of Challendon. Ground Cover area: 26,882 square feet Hardscape area: 12,220 square feet 10-6 The south side of Banyan from Rochester to Day Creek. The north side of Banyan from 427 feet west of Rocking Horse to Rocking Horse. The west side of Day Creek from Banyan to Vintage. The Day Creek median from Banyan to Vintage. The north side of Vintage from Day Creek to paseo ending 153 feet west of Sand Hill. Ground Cover area: 44,000 square feet Hardscaoe area: 16,197 square feet 10-7 The north side of Vintage from 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Vintage to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 22,164 square feet Hardscape area: 11,724 square feet 10-8 .The landscape against the south side facing wall north of the 210 freeway from the top of the slope on the east side of Day Creek to 300 feet eastward. The Day Creek median from the 210 freeway to Vintage. The east side of Day Creek from Caltrans ROW to Vintage. The south side of Vintage from Day Creek to 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon. Ground Cover area: 16,841 square feet Hardscape area: 7,025 square feet 10-9 The north side of Coyote from Brookstone Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Coyote to 358 feet north of Coyote. The west side of Day Creek from 118 feet north of Coyote to 380 feet north of Coyote. Ground cover area: 9,403 square feet Hardscape area: 6,052 square feet *This site previously had 8,488 square feet of ground cover and 5,752 of Hardscape prior to the addition of the area on the west side of Day Creek 10-10 The north side of Wilson from 395 feet east of Day Creek to Day Creek. The eastside of Day Creek from Wilson to Blackstone. The south side of Blackstone from Day Creek to Stoneview. The north side of Blackstone from Day Creek to 165 feet west of Stoneview. Ground cover area: 26,304 square feet Hardscape area: 19,117 square feet 10-11 The west side of Day Creek from 340 feet north of Banyan to Banyan. The north side of Banyan from Day Creek to Rocking Horse. Ground cover area: 20,378 square feet Hardscape area: 11,212 square feet 10-12 The paseo on the east side of Stoneview Rd. across from Duncaster PI. Ground cover area: 3,326 square feet Hardscape area: 2,374 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P886 Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and p'aseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P887 ~_ Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 Im rovement Ma RANCHO UCAMON N ~0-9 10-12 P, OP P~ to-t ~~~ 10.10 ~D3 WILSON AV 10-3 0 10< 010-6 Tn. m•p•. e•w..^a eeomapm• mo~mao^ ('mrwm.no~ I .al~el• eY •^n m~x,en me cry of RamM cu<.mo^p. re v~e••m•e n. p.am ~e:oor^e o.ye^ual nmrmxo^ Tn• CM of Ran[na Cummarye meMee nor impLrs no .mr. rrom+emxio^ o. e~xamee.e ~o me oomem. ..QO•^c.,.amq oomplame.: o. omeY^eae of •^y mm~meuan p~waea io voo oxen. rn. ~ee~•nome ^oi rely upon me mn~maoo^ ~o~ a^r ~eeeo^ am ie mreoi.a m InoapenamllY Doily •^Y one all I^lormafpn p~eaentN nenln J Tne Clry of R•ncno Cuomonga evplcitty •na w2nouaimJtlon p] aiaaaimu^ra^a.u~eweam.ro^e o^e wx~•m..•..i^owemR' Y DAY ew noumuea m. me Imp.ee wemm~ee of m.mn•m•ellnr •ne W mwaron p.n¢mx poroo•e. Tne cnr olRmmo co•.mo^c• W CR~E •n•n^.nnx•~epl ^o~a•e..^e .^r luonM,~roamlaamm' ~ PARK umn log9 •nT enora. om U .,r imorm.mn p~wme a^am61)a~y+=oo~or iinem~ ~m^q ao• to •^r p.none re..^o. upo^ lM morm•r ^ ~~ 10-1 it wam• nerein. p 010-7 10-D 0 WATER METER ~ IRRIGATION PUMP \ ~ P T 1o-e IRRIGATION LINE - PARKS Q LMD 10 BOUNDARY MAJOR STREET 121°oNRP 1210OFRP I zio-Fw ® FREEWAY 12T1,O~OF-RP 12100RRP HIGHLAND AV PARCELS P888 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2012/13 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $142,510.00 Overtime Salaries 1,050.00 Part-time Salaries 27,590.00 Frinoe Benefits 70.340.00 Subtotal Personnel $241,490.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $26,500.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilities 4,000.00 O & M/Computer Equipment 810.00 Cellular Technology 360.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 1,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 1,000.00 Contract Services 148,730.00 Contract Services/Facilities 2,000.00 Tree Maintenance 15,260.00 Utilities Water Utilities 79,130.00 Electric Utilities 54,110.00 Assessment Administration 4,130.00 General Overhead 42.580.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $379,610.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Proieds $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget I $621,100.00 Total Estimated Assessment $462,770.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 1 030.00 Total Estimated Revenue $461,740.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 159.360.00 Total Expenditure Budget $621,100.00 Total Estimated Assessment $462,770.00 Total District EBU Count 751.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 ~ $616.20 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2012/13 $811.01 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2012113 P889 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $1,083,260.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (159,360.00) Ooeratina Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2073 Reserve Fund Balance $923,900.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2012/13 P890 of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P891 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of . 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zohes of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout Rancho Etiwanda and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within Rancho Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P892 Etiwanda. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within Rancho Etiwanda which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within Rancho Etiwanda and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed forsaid maintenance. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P893 Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2012113 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $811.01 $616.20 751 751 The following table reflects both the maximum allowable assessment and the actual assessment rates for each year since the formation of the district and the proposed assessment rate for fiscal year 2012113 for the District: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment er EBU Actual Assessment er EBU 2001/02 $597.09 $597.09 2002/03 613.69 597.09 2003/04 637.75 597.09 2004105 648.93 597.09 2005/06 675.03 597.09 2006/07 706.54 597.09 2007/08 733.65 616.20 2008109 757.73 616.20 2009/10 757.73 616.20 2010/11 771.79 616.20 2011/12 771.79 616.20 2012/13 787.94 616.20 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P894 Cost Of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2002/2003, the amount of the assessment for the District has increased each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operatirig costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2012/13 will not increase. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2012/13 P695 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2012/13 o d ~ ~~ w V N ._ O > ~ O ~ ~ ~_ ny ti~ay~ 01 ti ~ ; .._.._.._.._ ~ J ti.r o C N i N N C C ~ ~ m it o ~ i m c 3 m ° ! lL Q i .n se .. i ® i ~ i ny epueml;3 _.._.._.. ~ ny epuenn43 Q I V 1 ~ ~8 tae ! \_«_« i ny ~a;sayaoa !- ~ i ~ ny ~a;sayooa J ,~..~ i i i ny ua~!II!W ~._.._.._.._.._ _ i ny ua~gl!W i i i i ny uaneH ! i i inb uaneH i i ny esowiaH ~ - ! ny esowiaH i i ny pleglya~b' i my PIeQ!4o~t/ i ny uewllaH i ~•~" ~ ny uewllaH i ter" t t a ny p e~(aul/~ iS uellawe~ ~ "~ L i s s~np'a~~s= i .._.._ •'•• .•~ 2' ~ .._Y'Y.._.._«_ _ _f AF/ anOJ~ s4* S fig8E~~ ~ s 41 9a~g~G2x n ~_. ~. In C m ~ .. .. ~ s e ~_ ~ z s •~•• aL.. ~ _ L h ~ N O Q E• a ~- 0! m m ~ psi J'~~~i ggg;s~i ~ C <fip Y~s~Y~d::§5 w m ii~!~"sop~F S g~~^8 eEi.[ ~ i'~~~E=~ei,~a yj ~B~~E~d!'n ~~~ G`~(~f7 E~nzg ea @L ~ ` ~aiigi~ ~!!z P897 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2012/13 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2012/13 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $811.01 751.00 751.00 $609,068.51 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Count Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $616.20 751.00 751.00 $462,766.20 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexation is effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Number Annexation Date Pro'ect Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Property Type Coun Use Code 0225-161-65 8 71 07/06/11 TR 18032 23 SFD 23.00 Single-Family Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2012/13 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTAfENT P898 RANCHO Date: July 18, 2012 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services ~ ~---~ By: Christopher P. Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT, AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013. NO INCREASE OF THE ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagram and Assessment, approve the Annual Engineer's Report, and order the levy and collection of the annual assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. There is no increase to the current rate in this district proposed for Fiscal Year 2012/2013..The Engineer's Report is also on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Report for the Districts, identifies proposed Fiscal Year 2012/2013 assessment rates. The Engineer's Report identifies the required budget for the District, including the surplus, if any, remaining in the fund balance. Budgeted Expenses $1,671,600 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies-$1,115.460 Deficit from operating reserves $ 556,140 This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $694,080.00. At the current level of expenditures it will likely be necessary to conduct a Prop 218 ballot process in order to preserve current levels of service, or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. Staff anticipates bringing this matter to the City Council for discussion in Fiscal Year 12/13. P899 CONSID1:12A'110N'I'O APPROV E'I'LIE RIiSOL,U"I10N I~OR PARK AND R13CRI:A"PION Ibf]'ROV EhLGNT DISIRICC NO. PD-85 1'~OR PISCN, YEAR 2012/2013. JULY 18, 2012 PAGE 2 Definition Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres 25.01 acres and larger Assessment per Parcel $31.00 $31.00 $15.50 $46.50 $108.50 $217.00 $434.00 $775.00 Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Engineer's Report P900 RESOLUTION NO. 12-128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2 01 212 0 1 3 WHEREAS, the City .Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 20th day of June, 2012, adopt its Resolution of Intention No.12-090 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer as required by the 1972 Act; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom, and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby finds and determines that notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act. SECTION 2: The final assessments and diagram for the proceedings, as contained in the final Engineer's Report for the District, are hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the District contained in the Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 are hereby confirmed and levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the District in the amounts as set forth in applicable Engineer's Report. SECTION 3: This City Council finds and determines that the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the District for the Fiscal Year 2012/2013, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 12-090, be done and made. P901 SECTION 4: The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5: The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Said filing to be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August. SECTION 6: After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7: The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8: The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencin_ g July 1, 2012 and ending June 30, 2013. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 2012. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2012. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P902 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2012/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga PARKS AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 Approved: Mark A. Steuer, Director Engineering Services/City Engineer Nt. C053572 ' Ezp.6~30.1 P903 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT No. PD - 85 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Bassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 2 P904 TABLE OF CONTENTS Boundary Map ....................................................................... 12 Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 3 P905 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report PD-85 Fiscal Year 2012/2013 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 2012/2013 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Subsequently the debt has been repaid with only the ongoing maintenance and operation with periodic capital improvement expenditures of the parks remaining. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XI I IA. Properties owned by public agencies, Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 4 P906 such as a city, county, state, or the federal goverriments is not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission right-of-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. District Boundary The district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn & Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD - 85. C. Facilities The existing works within the District boundary are generally described as follows: 1. The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. D. The assessment rate for a residential dwelling unit for the 2012/2013 FY is $31.00. All other assessment rates are based on actual land use information obtained from the County San Bernardino Assessor's data. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 P907 ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. Proposed Maintenance Budget: FY 2012/2013 PROJECTED REVENUE $1,115,460.00 Personnel Services Regular Salaries $528,210.00 Overtime Salaries 3,680.00 Part Time Salaries 52,320.00 Fringe Benefits 254,880.00 Subtotal $839,090.00 Ooerations & Maintenance Operations & Maintenance $119,750.00 Operations & Maintenance -Facilities 5,000.00 Vehicle Operations & Maintenance 1,000.00 Emergency Equipment & Veh. Rntl 3,000.00 Equip Operations & Maint. 10,000.00 Contract Services 33,380.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 18,200.00 Telephone Utilities 8,090.00 Water Utilities 248,320.00 Electric Utilities 117,440.00 Assessment Administration 152,550.00 Admin./General Overhead 115.780.00 Subtotal $832,510.00 Caaital Outlay Capital Outlay - Improv. Other than Bldg 0.00 Subtotal 0.00 Total PD-85 Expenditure Budget $1,671,600.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -556,140.00 Projected Revenue $1,115,460.00 Total District Assessment $1,147,540.00 Total District Parcel Count 27,741 Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 6 P908 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County; whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund $1,250,220.0 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2012/13 (556,140.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2012/13 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund $694,080.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Overtime Salaries: This item includes costs attributed to work performed by full-time employees over and above their normal scheduled hours. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the parks improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the parks improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the parks. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 P909 Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping and parks. Utilities- Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required forthe operation and maintenance of the parks lighting, sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District .services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Protects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 P910 METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefit received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A -includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B -includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C -includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels are those parcels listed by the County Assessor's as exempt and/or which have an assessed value of less than $500. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size/Range Less than 1.5 Acres and 1.51 to 3.5 Acres and 3.51 to 7.0 Acres and 7.01 to 14.0 dwelling units 14.01 to 25.0 Acres and 25.01 acres and larger Dwelling Units/Parcel 1 or more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 8 or dwelling units 15 or more dwelling units 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownership; Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 9 P911 3. Railroad mainline rights-of-way 4. Major utility transmission rights-of-way; 5. Mineral rights; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and, C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate, which will be levied during fiscal year 2012/2013, is $31.00 per residential dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $31.00 times the number of residential dwelling units. Category B: The assessment, which maybe levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 2012/2013, shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment Per Parcels Single Family Residential $31.00 Multi-Family Residential $31.00 Less than 1.5 Acres $15.50 1.51 Acres to 3.50 Acres $46.50 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres $108.50 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres $217.00 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres $434.00 25.01 Acres and larger $775.00 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 10 P912 Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2012/13 Fiscal Year. Boundary Map An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 11 ~ ~~ N ~ a N .~ n. J ~ ~ .~ ~ p `~ Q C U Q ~ .~ p ~ ~ ~: ~ w ~ ~~- - ny dJJay~ J y ~~ o y _ 1 .._.._.._.._ ~ N j ~ o `H ; J m ~ G N _ y j ~ r 3 m a ° ~ ~i Q i h _.. ^d ise3 in y ny epuen~g3 ny epuennB3 Q i j ~8 ~{aaJ~ lea ny Jalsayooa i ny Jalsayoob i ..~ ny ua~!II!W ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esowJaH , (~ ny esowJaH ny PIeQ!4oJV ' ^H Pleq!yoJy ny uewllaH ~ ~ ny uewllaH ~ L L ~ ny pJeJ(auln 3S ue!lawe~ ~~¢€~€~j$~~~~2 ~ abE ~yS fiBF~ n2 9E~ €§ag28~~~ d- s VJ J ~ m 2 V) ~,~€sR"~~S fiF L 3 L g~+5 ~34t¢°~ ~ N .L-. O aO EIS fla~~ N O i~~§s s3 §`~ ~ C m lL c jjis.s,~~figs 'v° to gujjggetijE31~~ m 9Da2E~t Pj• laa~d$s~£6$ Et~oE3a~~~~€ STAFF. REPORT 1U1NC1-IO CUC~1n10NG~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: July 18, 2012 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FIRE DISTRICT'S GENERAL FUND FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,203,610 Consideration of approval of a resolution adopting the Fire District's General Fund Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2012/13 in the amount of $24,203,610. BACKGROUND The Health and Safety Code, commencing with Section 13890, requires that Fire Protection Districts: 1. adopt a preliminary budget; 2. publish notice regarding a public hearing for final budget adoption; and 3. that on or before October 151 of each year the Board shall adopt its final budget. In compliance with the above requirements, the Fire District Board of Directors has: 1. conducted public budget workshops on June 6 and June 14, 2012 and adopted the preliminary budget on June 21, 2012; 2. published on two occasions in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin notices regarding the public hearing for consideration of final budget adoption; and 3. submitted for consideration. of approval a resolution adopting the General Fund Final Budget during the Board meeting scheduled for July 18, 2012. P914 The Fire District was able to achieve a proposed balanced budget through a combination of slight revenue increases and continued improvements of operational and administrative efficiencies without the use of reserves or infusion of City General Fund revenues. P915 APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FIRE DISTRICT'S GENERAL FUND PAGE 2 FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,203,610 JULY 18, 2012 The preliminary budget has been available for public inspection in accordance with the Health and Safety Code. The final budget is hereby presented for your consideration of approval. Respectf y subm~itt~ed, ,~e'' ~-" Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachment: Resolution No. FD 12-046 P916 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-046 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FIXING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2012 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2013 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District adopted its General Fund Preliminary Budget on June 21, 2012, and made said preliminary budget available for inspection by interested taxpayers; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors noticed a time and place for a public hearing regarding the preliminary budget; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District conducted said hearing in accordance with requirements set forth in the Health and Safety Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby adopt the General Fund Final Budget for the District for fiscal year 2012/13-and is hereby fixed and established as set forth and attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael.. President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P917 I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of 2012. Executed this day of 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. 12-046 -Page 2 of 2 P918 STAFF REPORT CITI' M.-~NAGER~ti OFFICE RANCHO Date: July 18, 2012 C,,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John Gillison, City Manager From: Fabian A. Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Subject: DESIGNATION OF A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATES FOR THE 2012 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council designate one Voting Delegate and two Alternates for the Business Meeting of the 2012 League of California Cities Annual Conference. BACKGROUND This year's League of California Cities Annual Conference is scheduled for Wednesday, September 5 through Friday, September 7, 2012, in San Diego. The Annual Business Meeting will take place at the conclusion of the Conference on Friday, September 7'". The membership will be taking action on a number of Conference Resolutions, which establish League policy on municipal issues of statewide importance. The League of California Cities (i.e., the "League") requires that each member city designate one (1) Voting Delegate and up to two (2) Alternates, which according to the League bylaws must be designated by an official vote of the City Council. The designated Voting Delegate and Alternates must be registered to attend the Conference and sign in at the League Voting Desk. Only one (1) Voting Card will be provided at sign-in to be used by either the Voting Delegate OR the Alternates. The task of voting at the Business Meeting cannot be transferced to any other city official beyond the designated Voting Delegate and Alternates. The Voting Delegate and Alternates may be designated at the Council's discretion from Council Members or City Staff scheduled to attend the Conference. Either the Voting Delegate or the Alternates must be present with the Voting Card at the Business Session to vote. CONCLUSION For your consideration, it is offered as a recommendation that the City Council designate one Council Member to serve as the primary Delegate and another Council Member to serve as an Alternate; with Staff or an additional Council Member serving as the second Alternate. Respectfully Submitted, Fabian A. Villenas Principal Management Analyst Attachment -League Annual Conference Voting Procedures and Submittal Form P, ~i ~i ~ fit, I~. ~,,^ r I ' f~ ~ ~i sa~R,~~_N-~, :~- sn ~ E , i MAY 0 0 2012 ~ ~ l l L, ~ 1~.~i U rx: ;>ic) ~~ r2.~" '~' ~--'~ `` •: ,. F.LIrCkNiF. W W W.CAC[TIES.ORG Council Action Advised by August 3, 2012 May 3, 2012 TO: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES League of California Cities Annual Conference -September 5 - 7, San Diego The League's 2012 Annual Conference is scheduled for September 5 - 7 in San Diego. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting (at the General Assembly), scheduled for noon on Friday, September 7, at the San Diego Convention Center. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, your city council must designate a voting delegate. Your city may also appoint up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Please complete the attached Voting Delegate form and return it to the League's office no later than Wednesday, August 15, 2012. This will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternates' records prior to the conference. Please note the following procedures that are intended to ensure the integrity of the voting process at the Annual Business Meeting. Action by Council Required. Consistent with League bylaws, a city's voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. When completing the attached Voting Delegate form, please attach either a copy of the council resolution that reflects the council action taken, or have your city clerk or mayor sign the form affirming that the names provided are those selected by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone. Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. To register for the conference, please go to our website: www.cacities.or¢. In order to cast a vote, at least one person must be present at the Business Meeting and in possession of the voting delegate card. Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up -over- C,,,, u P919-A the voting delegate card at the Voting Delegate Desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit them into the voting area during the Business Meeting. • Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the Business Meeting, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official. • Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the Business Meeting, individuals with the voting card will sit in a separate area. Admission to this area will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. If the voting delegate and alternates wish to sit together, they must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk and obtain the special sticker on their badges. The Voting Delegate Desk, located in the conference registration area of the San Diego Convention Center, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, September 5, 9:00 a.m. — 6:30 p.m.; Thursday, September 6, 7:00 a.m. —4:00 p.m.; and September 7, 7:30-10:00 a.m. The Voting Delegate Desk will also be open at the Business Meeting on Friday, but not during a roll call vote, should one be undertaken. The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo. Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city's voting delegate and alternates. Once again, thank you for completing the voting delegate and alternate form and returning it to the League office by Wednesday, August 15. If you have questions, please call Mary McCullough at (916) 658-8247. Attachments: • 2012 Annual Conference Voting Procedures • Voting Delegate/Alternate Form _ P920 r, ~. ~~ LEAGUE _CIATFIES 1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240 www.cacities.org Annual Conference Voting Procedures 2012 Annual Conference One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals aze identified on the Voting Delegate Form provided to the League Credenfials Committee. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting cazd at the Voting Delegate Desk in the conference registration azea. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting azea at the Business Meeting. 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who aze voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city's voting cazd by providing a signature to the Credentials Committee at the Voting Delegate Desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution. 5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting cazd and be registered with the Credentials Committee. The voting cazd may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate or alternate. 6. Voting Area at Business Meeting. At the Business Meefing, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. oIE~~G Iv~E CITY: ~~- CITIES 2012 ANNUAL CONFERENCE )'OTING DELEGATE/ALTERNATE FORM Please complete this form and return it to the League office by Wednesday, AUgUSt 15, 2012. Forms not sent by this deadline may be submitted to the Voting Delegate Desk located in the Annual Conference Registration Area. Your city council may designate one voting delegate and up to two alternates. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting (General Assembly), voting delegates and altemates must be designated by your city council. Please attach the council resolution as proof of designation. As an alternative, the Mayor or Ciq~ Clerk may sign this form, affirming [hat the designation reflects the action taken by the council. Please note: Voting delegates and alternates will be seated in a separate area at the Annual Business Meeting. Admission to this designated area will be limited to individuals (voting delegates and altemates) who are identified with a special sticker on their conference badge. This sticker can be obtained only at the Voting Delegate Desk. 1. VOTING DELEGATE Name: Title: 2. VOTING DELEGATE -ALTERNATE 3. VOTING DELEGATE -ALTERNATE Name: Title: PLEASE ATTACH COUNCIL RESOLUTION DESIGNATING VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATES. OR ATTEST: I affirm that the information provided reflects action by the city council to designate the voting delegate and alternate(s). Name: Mayor or Citv Clerk (circle one) (signature) Date: E-mail Phone: Please complete and return by Wednesday, August IS~h, to: League of California Cities FAX: (916) 658-8240 ATTN: Mary McCullough E-mail: mmccullough@cacities.org 1400 K Street (916) 658-8247 Sacramento, CA 95814 P922 STAFF REPORT RANCHO Date: July 18, 2012 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Robert Karatsu, Library Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the City Council Library Sub-Committee's recommendation to appoint Darren Vilardo and Kathy Sommer to three years and re- appoint Ruth Leal, Teresa Akahoshi, Rebecca Davies and Leslie May to serve additional four-year terms on the Library Foundation. BACKGROUND The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Foundation is a 501 c3 organization dedicated to fundraising for the Library. Currently there are 10 members appointed by the City Council, with the maximum number of Foundation Directors stated by the by-laws to be 21, and the minimum 7. Darren Vilardo and Kathy Sommer have applied to serve on the Library Foundation. Prior to submitting their formal application, they have met with staff as well as with Foundation members to learn more about the duties and responsibilities of a Library Foundation member. In addition, the term of office for current Library Foundation members Ruth Leal, Teresa Akahoshi, Rebecca Davies and Leslie May expire at the end of July 2012. All have formally indicated their desire to continue serving on the Foundation Board. The City Council Library Sub-Committee at their meeting of June 21, 2012 discussed these applications for the Library Foundation Board and will announce their recommendations this evening. Respectfully submitted, ' ~~/~ - Robert Karatsu Library Director