HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999/10/19 - Agenda Packet 4
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES
TUESDAY OCTOBER 19, 1999 7:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
RAINS ROOM
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Committee Members: Larry McNiel Pam Stewart Nancy Fong
Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias John Mannerino
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such
as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting.
7:00 p.m.
(Debra) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16001 - LEWIS
APARTMENT COMMUNITIES-A proposed subdivision of ten numbered lots and
four lettered lots on 23.5 acres of land for condominium purposes in the Medium-
High Residential(14-24 dwelling units per acre);within the Terra Vista Community
Plan generally bounded by Elm and Spruce Avenues and Church Street, and the
future La Mission Park -APN: 1077-421-040. Related file: Development Review
99-19. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-19 -
LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES -The design review of 360 condominium
units on 23.5 acres in the Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per
acre); within the Terra Vista Community Plan generally bounded by Elm and
Spruce Avenues and Church Street,and the future La Mission Park -APN: 1077-
421-040. Related file: Tentative Tract 16001. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS
This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant
regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public
testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input.
7:15 p.m.
(Warren) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-42 -
TOMRA PACIFIC. INC. - A request to install a baling machine within an existing
recycling facility on 2.49 acres of land in Subarea 5 of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan, located at 991 E. 6th Street-APN: 209-211-43.
8:00 p.m.
(Rudy) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15963 - PKT
PROPERTIES LLC -A residential subdivision of 13 single family lots on 4.37 acres
of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located south of
Banyan Street,on the east side of Archibald Avenue and on the west side of London
Avenue - APN: 201-251-01. Related files: Development Review 99-42 and Tree
Removal Permit 99-13.
DRC COMMENTS
f October 19, 1999
Page 2
PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the
Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five
minutes per individual.
ADJOURNMENT
l
CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS
7:00 P.M. Debra Meier October 19, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16001 - LEWIS APARTMENT
COMMUNITIES-A proposed subdivision of ten numbered lots and four lettered lots on 23.5 acres
of land for condominium purposes in the Medium-High Residential(14-24 dwelling units per acre);
within the Terra Vista Community Plan generally bounded by Elm and Spruce Avenues and Church
Street, and the future La Mission Park -APN: 1077-421-040. Related file: Development Review
99-19.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-19-LEWIS APARTMENT
COMMUNITIES-The design review of 360 condominium units on 23.5 acres in the Medium-High
Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre); within the Terra Vista Community Plan generally
bounded by Elm and Spruce Avenues and Church Street, and the future La Mission Park -
APN: 1077-421-040. Related file: Tentative Tract 16001.
PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING
Attachment
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Debra Meier
The modifications made by the applicant have improved the architectural theme of the project.
However, the Committee indicated that the developer should continue working with staff on the
elevations to add more detailing that will more completely carry the theme of the Traditional
Bungalow style architecture. Details such as rafter tails, outriggers, etc., shall be used along the
eave line. In addition, the applicant was requested to vary the wood railing, shutter and garage
door details in order to create variety within the project.
With these modifications, the Committee, recommended that the project be forwarded to the
Planning Commission for consideration.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
5:30 P.M. Debra Meier October 5, 1999
i
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16001 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
99-19-LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES-A proposed subdivision of ten numbered lots and four
lettered lots on 23.5 acres of land for condominium purposes; and the design review of 360 units in
the Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre);within the Terra Vista Community Plan
generally bounded by Elm and Spruce Avenues and Church Street, and the-future La Mission Park
-APN: 1077-421-040.
Background: Tentative Tract 16001 is located in the southwest quadrant of Terra Vista. Existing
multi-family residential and commercial development is predominant throughout. this quadrant.
Tentative Tract 13717 was previously approved on this site in 1990 and was never recorded.
However,Tentative Tract 13717 modified the Terra Vista Community Plan land use from Medium (8-
14 dwelling units per acre) to the current Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) residential
density.
Proiect Summary: Tentative Tract 16001, titled "Saint Moritz," is described by the applicant as "an
up-scale amenity-packed, luxuriously appointed community catering to the Renter by Choice." The
proposed project features"European-theme" architecture with attached and detached garages, and
a variety of recreational and open space amenities including pools and spas,barbecue nodes,tot lots,
fitness and recreation center, and out door fireplace. The project consists of 360 units including
246 two-bedroom plans and 114 three-bedroom plans.
-. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
1. Architecture theme: The applicants' project description describes the architecture as a
,European-theme, which is not expressed on the elevations. Additional decorative
architectural elements for all elevations should be used to carry out the intended theme.
2. Access for pedestrians is limited to the three project entries. It may be beneficial to provide
pedestrian access near street intersections,especially at Spruce and Elm Avenues,to facilitate
access to Ruth Musser Middle School and Spruce Avenue park; directly into La Mission Park;
and at elm Avenue and church Street for access to the commercial development and
restaurants; in order to discourage "fence-hopping."
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Vary the garage door pattern in pairs for additional variety.
2. Move the sidewalk that traverses through the open turf area (located near the primary pool)
to take full advantage of the open play that is provided by this open space.
3. Mitigation measures stemming from traffic noise includes 5-foot high sound barrier,consisting
of wood or plexi-glass. This is recommended along the second floor balconies for apartment
units proposed that would be impacted by 60 dBA Ldn to reduce traffic noise levels in the
outdoor activity area below, including all apartment units which face Church Street, Elm and
Spruce Avenues.
? Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee focus on the architectural theme,
resolve the minor items noted above, and refer the project to Planning Commission for approval.
DRC COMMENTS
TT 16001 & DR 99-19 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES
October 5, 1999
Page 2
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Nancy Fong, John Mannerino, Pam Stewart
Staff Planner: Debra Meier
The applicant corrected the information provided in their original application by describing that the
architectural theme is"Traditional American"rather than"European." The Traditional style emphasis
such elements as simple architectural forms,flat concrete, roof tile,wood shutters,and roof line relief.
The restroom/pool equipment building has been revised, but is still a work-in-progress. The applicant
is trying to achieve the right proportion of focus and scale for the small structure.
The Committee commented that regardless of the chosen architectural style, the project looks like a
"standard apartment project"and does not reflect the appearance of luxury apartments. The leasing
and recreation building need to be enhanced to attract the attention of prospective tenants. The
Committee suggested to the applicant's to consider the following:
1. What will attract a potential tenant to this project as a luxury apartment, in comparison to other
project in the area?
The Committee requested that the applicant return to Design Review Committee on October 19, 1999
for review of modifications to architectural elements.
r
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:15 P.M. Warren Morelion October 19, 1999
`i
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-42-TOMRA PACIFIC
INC.-A request to install a baling machine within an existing recycling facility on 2.49 acres of land
in Subarea 5 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 991 E. 6th Street-APN: 209-211-43.
Design Parameters: The Site is within an existing recycling facility, which has been in operation
since 1978 exclusively for processing aluminum cans. Because of the adoption of the Beverage
Container Act in 1989, the recycling facility has been mandated to receive and process all types
of California Redemption Value(CRV)beverage containers. These containers include, but are not
limited to, aluminum cans, plastic bottles, glass bottles, and bimetal cans. To process the variety
of containers a press is needed. The machine is proposed to be placed behind an 8-foot 6-inch
wall as shown on Exhibit"A."
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
1. Based on the plans submitted to the Planning Division, the bailing press will extend
approximately 8 inches above the two 8-foot 4-inch screen walls on-site (Exhibit "A").
Instead of requiring additional screening, staff recommend additional trees to be provided
in front of the landscaped setback area subject to City Planner review and approval.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. All exterior cable(s)and/or ducting extending from the baling press will have to be screened
from public view. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with building design.
2. Outdoor storage of the baler site is visible from adjacent properties and 6th Street. Per
Industrial Area Specific Plan standards, all materials, supplies, equipment, and operating
trucks in the General Industrial areas shall be stored within an enclosed building or a
screened area from public view. The current application will not require the installation of
screening at this time. Because the existing recycling center was approved in 1978 and
screening of the outdoor areas was not made a condition of the original approval, and in
that the only proposed change to the existing use is the installation of the baler, staff does
not believe it is reasonable at this time to require the screening of the existing outdoor
storage areas. The recommendation will be forwarded to the Planning Commission.
However, it is important that the applicant keep in mind that any outdoor storage should be
kept at a minimum and out of the public view as much as possible.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee approve the project subject to the
modifications as recommended above.
Attachment
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Warren Morelion
DRC COMMENTS
CUP 99-42 - TOMRA PACIFIC, INC.
October 19, 1999
Page 2
The Committee recommended approval of the project with the exception that the applicant did not
have to provide additional trees in the front landscaped area. However, the Committee informed
the applicant that if the 1-inch railing extending above the screen walls were visible to the public,
it would have to be painted to match the existing building.
i
a
< I
( I I
I I
1 J
I 00 x
al
z �
! I �
EXH I N7--'k
tl1�-R1Xr-
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
8:00 P.M. Rudy Zeledon October 19, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15963- PKT PROPERTIES LLC-
A residential subdivision of 13 single family lots on 4.37 acres of land in the Low Residential District
(2-4 dwelling units per acre), located south of Banyan Street,on the east side of Archibald Avenue
and on the west side of London Avenue-APN: 201-251-01. Related files: Development Review
99-42 and Tree Removal Permit 99-13.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-42- PKT PROPERTIES
LLC - A design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for Tentative Tract 15963
consisting of 13 single family lots on 4.37 acres of land in the Low Residential District(2-4 dwelling
units per acre), located south of Banyan Street, on the east side of Archibald Avenue and on the
west side of London Avenue -APN: 201-251-01. Related files: Tentative Tract 15963 and Tree
Removal Permit 99-13.
Design Parameters: The project site is located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, north of
Lemon Street. The site contains 4.37 acres of vacant land with a few Eucalyptus trees on the
perimeter of the site and an existing single family home on the south west portion on the site. The
site has a natural slope of approximately 2 to 3 percent from north to south and is surround on all
sides by single family homes.
The site is proposed to be developed under the Low Residential Standards of Development Code.
The proposal is for the subdivision of 4.37 acres of land into 13 single family lots. The lots will
range in size from 8,301 square feet to 12,246 square feet, with an average size lot of 10,900
square feet. Two single story house plans are being proposed.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Maior Issues: The following broad issues will be on the focus of Committee discussion regarding
this project:
1. House plans 101-A & B appear to be a Spanish style design, however, additional
architectural detail and treatment is needed to enhance the front elevations, which could
include the following detail. (Please see attachment):
a. Enriched eave detail such as exposed rafter tails.
b. Corbel treatment on front windows.
C. Provide decorative quatrefoil element below gable roofs.
d. Enhancement of the front entry way, by extending the covered porch out about 6-feet
on house plan 102-A
2. House plans 102-A & B are designed in a traditional American style. Additional
architectural detail and treatment is also needed in the effort to enhance the front
elevations. The additional architectural treatment and detail shall include the following
(Please see attachment):
a. Enriched eave detail, such as cornice detail.
DRC COMMENTS
TT 15963 & DR 99-42 - PKT PROPERTIES LLC
October 19, 1999
Page 2
C .
b. Remove existing stucco wainscot treatment and replace with stone or brick veneer.
3. Provide architectural treatment to all elevations (i.e., 360 degree architecture). Avoid
expanses of blank walls,as shown on the right and left side elevations. Provide articulation
to the building plane to make it visually attractive
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Provide a minimum of 3-foot offset between the one and two garages, to offset wall plane
on all proposed house plans.
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends the project be revised and returned to Design
Review Committee, as a consent item, prior to scheduling for Planning Commission.
Attachment
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Rudy Zeledon
The Committee did not approve the project, and directed the applicant to work closely with staff to
resolve the major and secondary issues presented.
L- � 1 li .. �•� � I � q
1w an
AT
- 1 PORCHES & BALCONIES
DOORS & ENTRY D
i aM
TIGHT EAVE
i
WINDOW TREATMENT UNIQUE DETAILS
;i
i
FT-1, D Q0
flo
PORCHES & BALCONIES
a Do
a
DOORS & ENTRY
PIL
i
. rr
C C PIC N Do�J
L_I t
GD
WINDOW TREATMENT' UNIQUE DETAILS
4:12 ROOF PITC
24'' OVERHANG AT
EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS
tv"M114,
ONC."S" TILE
11511 1
Ml
OVERHANGS ROOF PITCH & MATERIAL
�{� l.S
r a SMOOTH STUCCO
I
�T CHIMNEYS
EXTERIOR FINISH
h
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
October 19, 1999
t
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
Secretary
l '
i