HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/07/15 - Agenda Packet ACTION AGENDA
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
TUESDAY JULY 15, 2008 7:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
RAINS ROOM
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Committee Members: Lou Munoz Pam Stewart Corky Nicholson
Alternates: Richard Fletcher Frances Howdyshell Ray Wimberly
CONSENT CALENDAR
7:00 p.m.
(Adam/Tasha) HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00302 - 8916 REALES STREET - ROBERTO
GRACIANO - A request to add a two-story 456 square foot addition to an existing
residence within the Hillside Overlay, located at 8916 Reales Street —
APN: 1061-801-15. This item was continued from the July 1, 2008, Design Review
Committee meeting.
PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS
This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding
their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although
the Committee may open the meeting for public input.
7:10 p.m.
(Tabe/Mark) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-01012 - CARTER REDISH - Site plan and design
review for 28,860 square foot warehouse/office building and associated parking on
approximately 1.39 acre of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at
the northeast corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue - APN: 0229-283-06 and
0229-271-33. This item was continued from the July 1, 2008, Design Review
Committee meeting.
7:30 p.m.
(Waen/Mark) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18994 — PNEUDRAULICS, INC. - A request to
subdivide 5.46 acres of land into two separate parcels for the construction of two industrial
buildings in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3), located at the southeast corner of
Arrow Route and Helms Avenue - APN: 0209-021-43. Related Files: Development
Review DRC2008-00083, Master Sign Program DRC2008-00360, and Tree Removal
Permit DRC2008-00359. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00083 -
PNEUDRAULICS, INC. - The development of two manufacturing buildings to
accommodate up to four tenant spaces with a total floor area of 88,200 square feet
(41,160 square feet and 47,040 square feet) on 5.46 acres of land in the General
Industrial District (Subarea 3), located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Helms
DRC ACTION AGENDA
July 15, 2008
Page 2
Avenue - APN: 0209-021-43. Related Files: Development Review DRC2008-00083,
Master Sign Program DRC2008-00360, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-0359. Staff
has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration.
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM DRC2008-00360 - A Master Sign Program for the property
at 8575 Helms Avenue. Related Files: Development Review DRC2008-00083, Tentative
Parcel Map SUBTPM18994, Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00359.
7:50 p.m.
(Steve/Willie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18212 -
CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 6 net acres of land into
67 residential condominium units in the proposed Medium Residential district
(8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and San
Carmela Court - APN: 1089-581-01. Related Files: General Plan Amendment
DRC2006-00224, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2006-00447, and
Development Review DRC2006-00730.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00730 -
CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop 67 residential condominiums
on 4.80 net acres of land in the proposed Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units
per acre), located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and San Carmela Court -
APN: 1089-581-01. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00224, Victoria
Community Plan Amendment DRC2006-00447, and Tentative Tract SUBTT18212.
8:10 p.m.
(Steve) UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2007-00798 - VICTORIA COMMONS - SUPERIOR
ELECTRICAL ADVERTISING
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
CONSENT CALENDAR
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Adam Collier July 15, 2008
HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00302 - 8916 REALES STREET - ROBERTO GRACIANO - A
request to add a two-story 456 square foot addition to an existing residence within the Hillside Overlay,
located at 8916 Reales Street—APN: 1061-801-15.
This item was continued from the July 1, 2008, Design Review Committee meeting.
Background: On October 27, 2004, the Planning Commission approved Hillside Design Review
DRC2004-00143 for the construction of a two-story 5,505 square foot home and a 780 square foot
detached four-car garage on .69 acre of land. The property is a single-family lot located within
Tract 11626 on the north side of Reales Street, just west of Beryl Street. The existing home was
developed within substantial conformance of Chapter 17.24 Hillside Development Regulations of the
City's Development Code. The site is bordered by county land to the north, and Very-Low Residential
single-family residences to the south, east, and west.
Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing a two-story 456 square foot addition that is consistent
with the design, colors, and materials of the existing residence. The addition consists of a second floor
game room and 126 square foot balcony that is accessible through the house and exterior stairwell. The
wrought iron balcony and stairwell will match the existing decorative wrought iron on the existing
residence. The proposed addition is within the 30-foot height limit set forth in the Hillside Development
Regulations.
Staff Comments: The following comments are designed to provide an outline for Committee discussion.
Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this
project.
1. The applicant has worked diligently with staff to address all major issues. There are no major
issues.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting the
committee will discuss the following secondary issues:
1. The applicant has worked diligently with staff to address all secondary issues. There are no
secondary design issues.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approves the project as
submitted.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Henderson
Staff Planner: Adam Collier
The Committee reviewed the project and recommend approval with no additional conditions.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:10 p.m. Tabe van der Zwagg July 15, 2008
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-01012 - CARTER REDISH - Site plan and design review for
28,860 square foot warehouse/office building and associated parking on approximately 1.39 acre of land
in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Charles
Smith Avenue -APN: 0229-283-06 and 0229-271-33.
This item was continued from the July 1, 2008, Design Review Committee meeting.
Design Parameters: The subject site is located at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith
Avenue. The site is approximately 1.39 acre in size, slopes roughly from the north to south, and is
adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway on the east side. The site is surrounded by other industrial developments
with a number of buildings of similar size and type of construction.
The project was originally reviewed by the Design Review Committee on May 6, 2008. At that meeting,
the Committee raised the following three main issues that they wanted the applicant to resolve prior to
the project being recommended for Planning Commission review: 1) revise the zero setback along the
freeway right-of-way in order to provide access to the rear of the building for maintenance purposes;
2) increase the on-site parking to allow a greater range of potential building tenants; and, 3) add wood
support beams and wood fascia to the shade structure of the outdoor eating area.
The applicant has made the following changes in response to the issues raised by the Committee:
1) increased the setback from the freeway right-of-way to 5 feet and have added landscaping to this
area; 2) increased on-site parking by two parking spaces (one over the requirement) and increased the
size of the office area from 1,000 to 1,500 square feet (and reduced the warehouse area by
1,340 square feet); and, 3) added wood posts and wood trellis support beams to the shade structure of
the outdoor eating area.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion.
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. All issues discussed at the previous meeting on May 6, 2008 (attached).
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee accept the project as presented and to
forward it to the Planning Commission for final review.
Attachment
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Henderson
Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwagg
The Committee recommended that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for final review
as presented.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:30 p.m. Waen Messner July 15, 2008
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18994 — PNEUDRAULICS, INC. - A request to subdivide 5.46 acres
of land into two separate parcels for the construction of two industrial buildings in the General Industrial
District (Subarea 3), located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Helms Avenue -
APN: 0209-021-43. Related Files: Development Review DRC2008-00083, Master Sign Program
DRC2008-00360, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00359. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00083 -
PNEUDRAULICS, INC. - The development of two manufacturing buildings to accommodate up to four
tenant spaces with a total floor area of 88,200 square feet (41,160 square feet and 47,040 square feet)
on 5.46 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3), located at the southeast corner of
Arrow Route and Helms Avenue - APN: 0209-021-43. Related Files: Development Review
DRC2008-00083, Master Sign Program DRC2008-00360, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00359.
Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM DRC2008-00360 - A Master Sign Program for the property at
8575 Helms Avenue. Related Files: Development Review DRC2008-00083, Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM18994, Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00359.
Project Description: The applicant is requesting to subdivide 5.46 acres of land into two parcels
(resulting in west and east lots) to develop two separate industrial buildings (with office, manufacturing
and warehousing) totaling 88,200 square feet (41,160 square feet for Building 1 and 47,040 square feet
for Building 2). The project also includes a Master Sign Program proposing two monument signs (one
fronting Helms Avenue and one fronting Arrow Route) and wall signs.
Design Parameters: The subject site is located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and
Helms Avenue and is presently vacant with sparse vegetation. To the north, across Arrow Route are
single-family residences; to the east is a business center; to the south is the applicant's existing industrial
facility; and to the west, across Helms Avenue, is an industrial facility. The applicant will be required to
install a curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, street lights, and trees along
with other improvements in the public right-of-way because of the lack of street improvements on street
frontages of Arrow Route and Helms Avenue.
The following table provides a summary of the proposed structures on-site:
Proposed Structures
Structures General Location Size
Building 1:
Office/manufacturing/warehousing Western lot of the site 41,160 square feet
Building 2:
Office/manufacturing/warehousing Eastern lot of the site 47,040 square feet
DRC ACTION AGENDA
SUBTPM18994, DRC2008-00083, AND DRC2008-00360 — PNEUDRAULICS, INC.
July 15, 2008
Page 2
The project is located in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3), which provides for light and medium
industrial land uses and serves as a buffer between non-industrial and heavy industrial uses. The
proposed subdivision will result in two separate lots (west and east). The applicant is proposing to
construct two industrial buildings, one on each parcel, to accommodate up to four tenants. Floor plan
renderings illustrate an office and manufacturing and warehouse area in each building. Both buildings
have been designed under one architectural concept, utilizing white/grey and a two-tone blue paint
scheme on concrete tilt-up panels. Both buildings will also have free-standing accent panels with a
darker shade of the same color scheme. The free-standing panels will be constructed along the north
and west sides of Building 1 and along the north and east sides of Building 2. The fenestration patterns
utilize 7-foot and 9-foot window panels with reflective glazing and are appropriate to the General
Industrial District (Subarea 3). The project includes two employee outdoor eating areas with trellises,
landscaping, tables, benches, and 4-inch thick concrete paving. Staff is pleased with the design concept
of the buildings. Both buildings on-site will have similar architectural features and height of 40 feet.
Signage (see Exhibit A): The applicant proposes two monument signs, one fronting Helms Avenue at
the northwest corner of the site and one fronting Arrow Route north of Building 2. The proposed
monument signs will be identified as "Pneudraulics Aerospace Center" and painted to match building
color palette. Since each building will accommodate up to two tenants, each tenant is limited to two wall
signs that can only be placed in designated areas of the building facade. Wall signs shall be located on
the north, west, and south elevations of Building 1, and on the north, east, and south of Building 2.
Multi-colored and nationally recognized trademark logos are permitted, subject to Planning Department
review and approval. Non-trademarked logos shall use BANK GOTHIC MD BT and SQUARE 721 BDEX
BT font styles and be limited to three colors. Currently, the applicant proposes the following colors:
painted brush aluminum/silver, black and white.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this
project.
1. None. The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve all major issues.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. The applicant proposes to include nine employee parking stalls in the loading dock area along the
eastern wall of Building 1. Typically, placing parking stalls in the loading dock is highly discouraged
and should not be permitted because of safety concerns. Currently, the number of parking stalls
proposed exceeds the minimum requirement by 11 stalls (required 115 stalls, provided 126 stalls).
Therefore, the removal of nine employee parking stalls from the loading dock area will not result in
parking shortage.
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. Outdoor furniture shall be provided in the outdoor employee eating area.
2. All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc.) shall be uniform.
DRC ACTION AGENDA
SUBTPM18994, DRC2008-00083, AND DRC2008-00360 — PNEUDRAULICS, INC.
July 15, 2008
Page 3
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed project and forwards the project
to the Planning Commission for consideration.
Attachment: Exhibit A—Uniform Sign Program (Provided under separate cover)
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Henderson
Staff Planner: Waen Messner
The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval of the project to the Planning
Commission, subject to the following revisions to be verified by staff:
1. Designate all parking stalls, located along the eastern wall of Building 1, as "Employee Parking"
only and illustrate on plans.
2. Reduce the proposed number of truck loading knockout doors for each building. Illustrate the
revised proposal on elevation renderings.
3. Add a note to Pages 6, 7 and 11 of the Uniform Sign Program stating that "All wall signs shall not
exceed 70 percent of the building facade area and shall not extend onto or beyond building
reveals." In addition, revise Pages 6 and 7 to illustrate that the wall signs will be contained in the
area between reveals.
cn W ,� "" E 0%
m ��
> D /� <� ° o
Q z Q W "=J #A
W
\ z ON z
z c��co
z z ON UU)W Q a a
� Q o+
c o
Lji ° J V a o�
J U
� Lj
® J
� � a Ln Z 3
Ln
co
rr
O �
W a
a a V
ul
V
a O o
z = a
V ,
N rn o° CC'
C-4
c
W Q L) c
L.p 0 eel
IL li w- at N
Q 0.
a
�_ j
r
4 x
w
a �
z Z
0
v 00 Z
� o
o 06-�"�
U z
Z
a W
W-
U— e i J
o U
- v �
—. NcngTLo %Dr- co O. O
aaaa a a _a.
0,
a- a. a. a
z z (n z V, Lu NU) (Dc) coc) co Uzco
40Ye0z L.U0 JZZ JO � ZQOW
J —
u — u' I-
aaQWrnU � pZ � W � � � O � OQ �
U W� ..O
NVwpzpO > > U' � u = � a W
W � � Z ^ m � mU) Co
p p W W Q 0 V1
H H z z u ° '` O Y co
W W O O
W H V a ~ Q
W zU WW W
W J J 1—
Z U WW
O
L
U
O
W
J
m .
Q
H
t9
a
' 9
°� I I
z z I
N o
+ r------------ W m I
!W i----------i �1�1�,1E I
99
QW I �s I
O I X s I L-------------� L----J
2 I ---W m-----J . � K
UT
W
It
I 1
v v
Fn
N.._ °I
AEI I ® � m I all
I �E1 W b I
1 �� .� > - a W Z CO
It J!1h
I I
a l
MEW l
-tlli tl!h
m' -
I
L11
E'T ��� 4.
6 f
—--- -
— --
\ —MIN
3
r '.W _ 3f1N3 tl SWl3.H
< � 1 Yta
-- -----_ --1-- 7T VF TT-1T-- /
N
aa
Y
L
C`
CD
C
(a
L
a�
N
O`
^ 0 3
z — o
a;
O
O O O W
c
d n a,
+., z
M 0 ro W
c Y
E VI 7
� � U to J
U cn � a W�Ln
W
p E in o l d C al Q N
a, E LJ
Q L6U
fu
❑ yYj Q N V C
0
C C �
N "
O
L
a+
n)
O u
O v C O
cc
`+ ; o O
` a+ C
d L O` U C U-
W O O to X N o o
— c 7
arEa o n WN
N N
u, S O D N � t Q J
u
c a' ` L
tn m •' ,� W
W a a
a,
L) E E c c � E
� c �o
O 2t,' a cw m
C o
Cal O Q L
O O w !_ c_ ut 0
E D O , �' w
al N C N N C7
CD
m O �n E '^ E x
a0+ VI 7 rya O 2
C C C d N W N
u w E < r4
v n 'c U. U
� L E N r- m N
E C O O O m
3 m2 CL c
O
�. m � ta E
c
O a, `0
c LE
c E f
E a, E r-
O n O :3 E c
Z 3 a � ^ E 'x W
m o U
U a E M a, m E ° WLn
h c n 4# E ate, m Q J
c 0 c L ; L.U
Z o �: N w o
E `.
W m Z O Y UJ tp O
L c w N N O
Z u E +
z z tn
O L J L (0 L — 0
1 P a H 2 Fn N
M
a
L
3NIl A183d ONd
Cn O z
wv
mph �
Q to
Q N
m in
F-
LUJ
En
W
W
U I
W W
W
z z
} o
W w a t1
o � �
a
Q
J �
I �
Q
O
Q
J
2
W
Z
C N
00 M
—WI Altl3dOdd
in (n
In
- ..._..._ 11
SW13H
l
�N ZN WN wn c0 z Z
o^ {7N=F a,1 H '.W CJ A OQO CAL] y0 F Q ui
(L xu 3u au w Z Z Xu -U, (7 �o� N y N3z� f W co 0 ❑ '< < < �'< Ia
IWoowuo< u c _J:~� 4�o Q O d(j 3 W Z N° o o N
'4.0 yW UOf f w�. ZU W Vo, �z 3 Q Z �.p O
>-U 2 CIO�S�3�3'.j W. O wV U v! 2x F. �O �, �D ,. _ "'.,u ��o � .� la is
�OVf_<7V1fN fN '� Z �V< U �m V
mZ Zc ZZ S. a� F- <u H . =Z1 W o Z W 1%1 W
fWOC 7W<U<U.m f SN ;i �¢m =, l o00 Q mV
3 _ w
IZWfO4 7 FK',FC�.� Z� Z } CJO Ui �i;-N o Z is
If WZ �- O O > f w ,. y V v -o o o io Ic
i7Z w< xZ,Z�.. 7Z 3�W Q k;� 1,, u up a0 Z� zao z z ,z
iJ6 -1 w<O<O.NU.O J< Nlll N O `•� W Z Z] =0 00 O� O O O
oo ZF 6.0�4U.�<' z -Co. U 3 m� 000 y _U' 3 W � �'n ;,T
Q fa U D w U- U S — -i Y J Z O d 3�a ze o [� a N <Z �^ > w , w > >
` a o oa o� zoo '.ems ¢ z irc
w W
�... W
LL
Q... .. r f W Z
f
f7�1 WI Q f W
V X Q J
O a m
CD
v J -3 f ❑ a
_ �nunun� W W W W
u � � Ln
I I
N
�/1 O ___ �' N� Nm NN NN
Y� CLI CJ aJ Q J Q J
U
u U U
cc V
m
❑ 101
q VI
WS
H
zI
W � I
V F1 W
El
H
i
� z
r Q I
a W
co
W
z v M
W W a
a � z
k LA
r Via' N
r;
Ln
CL
o c
aL+ c N
N G N C c U
p a,N C
° G a+ N .010~
aci > Lc tnE
� ,�' O
IA E a,
N L O G o u c
G U CP °` Q•- O a+ °
O L N C w p U
U O " N C > C G G
�O N L d o. W
N N — L
N C L C C ` ra �a +' O` �a
rp a, U c L CL
�+ ++ M OU o t >- += tn
ra C L 3 C
L — to
N m N ro v u c
C to th a, '^ O ro mac !_^
Z _ " G
ro C v = E
rorou +.
o` �a
u .` CO ro3 omt
u4'
CD a � L a, ca
0. 0
o,
p U U U c .r c U x .
m ,n x c
� •O
a O � O >, C > I- m O
.O � N ro o ° cu
U to
Z ra °' c r a, ° y CL n. O a,
coos °' u CL a)
a ro >, a L
Q c �.
ra " +, N > J
N uU O a o
.V N U L A
E to
' > 7 E N c ro C V t 'N 0` L ra o
H 00E '6° ° � y ra o W ° m a v °cv�� u8 oo
m ' > ._
o u y O` O y J
E to C ra C L ° J L E m 6
.r
c p` t0 o c 7 a N ra •' L !� t 7
7
O'�— O O of L C O O
O N a�.1 N C V G W +' a1 C U aL+ +L+
IL o ° o J � �, � � wa, 3
ccEc �. a, � a Ov c u �`•°
L31 a, C ro a L G a. " a, o• a t a r0 a
N F- J O c j > tA E �' w E E
E u to .. o to
O ate. d C C N C Fes- >. a !_' to _O C G
G N r0 ra O ` C a, p
C ar O '^ 3 O c !_^ d
>
a, C a, d p O O` r-
0, N 7 C ra ++ C
E u c a � 'u► " a w tea' v -J
c u v a, a, L
� C v a L 'O . O N o .0 c }, �
a
3 — 33 oO� '0 c ? a > F- E
c
= .°CL xw C t: �, ° cn o u ao
_ _o
'v°i E
v+ a,
r � o0, a ;c � aaG, v� o aoa, aoro �
O •+ — d N L — L `-' >�is N a
O .r
p G — E _ C fl u C N O >
a, > raO � 3 .0 0 C C ° v, cv O,aEO
W > arc c ° 3 'O mu 3 0 D o G v, m e m = a s
0 roc
�
,
W � N - > rco o H m a '� c c �, ro U
O
N 4, d ` ra
a. 7 O L c
01 1- QL m � aao � amLio E H o oa al
3
Q i m:
• I
- . ' i i iii 11IMAM== JAW�/:C■1�1 s �i �iii MEN
Ain
Ii I.I
i I.I �� _ I I. I i ,®� •
- am 1M1 1♦■ - a� 1�1
%m 1.1
11�:l���1 �� 11����1 •
• IIl • ■ ' • �) II '1■1■1 •
���■I�' Ili
■I �1�7���1 � 11■11•���1 ����
ir ' � � �-�i II! illll
Eli ■ '�'
ho NMI
URN NMI
LEM IM IM,
ISMEN1
�I■ I!. o •
• !r
• iii III � �®
404,
awl
LLJ
HIS■■I�'CL Z
r •
• 1.�1 1.1
CI 1�1 Nei Iiiiiiii
Ir up-
��
V, Iz • CM
3: LLJ
• ■ ■
• .• •
■I�i
i M I=i
NICEm IAA■I mo, 1�1 41■. 1M1 � Am 1■1���1 • IA■, 11■1 iii C 1n 1M1
11����1 . � IIE:'����1 11����1 •
• I loll■I
u 11=■■� ■■ ) I ■■■
• �� � �illii�
• it .,--
SEEM
CI■ 1M1 .�---•
10 1■1 : 1�
.A.■■I
. 11■ II.I I. .■'
• • u■ 11.1
1. 1■1
— i� 1AAB
. ■�
�� ..
N�
_
LLJ
LLJ
(I 1��1 ■
A.■..'
• 71 • •
• •
• 11■ ASI �I •
a� i�l 11�1��■11 •o
�� 1�1 ���i�■���
11®l7�/II •
=NINE -
..
LLI
• Ln
• •
a0
a
O w 'a «. o o
c .� c c v, c c•
vj
in 00 E E 3: � m C ° o+
C u C T is O
�o om ac � c 0 0C
c E ao CD
� •7 (A Z0 3 BCD M0
O 0 w a C L O C L
E o' a, �0 0 a'
O a ar N �+ •L V1 fo L UI
C
C N d' N C w a.+ w ta O U (a U
N
W L O O O O
vi
N N U O aL , = a 0 fa ate+ a d
z c 0 � 001- in E3c L E3C
to U a
L a > � 4, ' a`, '> v o
'" v c c m �o a0
in
a, Leo oa, Ew ya = w WO �oL0
O T a0. 7 � to J C A 41
C �0 u — O.C E N C } .. N C
u m coo Ma • a, 3 � c 3
a, m �o m e ,� �_ � T O v� '0 .�' T O
o a, a a, u o
m � •� (A 0_a � tea, CL
z ° c
W IA a 0 o a, vi• m a c
Q r �' a aa, uLCN 0 u a, om
Hy w 4! >' C O IA 3: Z L Uf 'N 2
vi (D o to %0 (D 0, m in 3 0% u
o o
z � . v, au, c E N o 0 0 0 Y o 0
C � C == N U C U W N . m O N
o
I �n aX u v� �o v, C Z 0
z Y0 E 0E � Eoc E � � E go
a,
�+
E go m A
. 00 7 E � O .0 a�i ~ C O a+ C a) Z of a. C N
2 Z c c o` �, 0 o` >,
_ �a N _ O a. 'a . C .
3 O 0, IA M M N tn
Z O E �o O H O d 3 o N � 0 Nate+ W W N tA
_ .� c .0 c. � c '°' °ia
J io �p d CL a+ O 0%L C
z O CD � c � a, o " �. � . � X oY
O v 'u c o cp c U c a 3 u c
wW c ° ° LO, c coo'- a O —° W ` '^ a
~ aL c - w COLm � m0 W � 0a
� � c cCE cE a' �] m CE
Ln W a+ O ` Vf �, c O �W
a Z C O N __ C N E C m N D O c
O E �0 N
a, •' �0 3 a, a N a, a
00
~— W E7- al vd aa
U H O n
N
O O — O C 'a>+`v�L
(l0 0 o N C
0 .0 u 1- 3 `0 � � Eo E W0z W E
W c � .a 0c E0 — ;, a, 0
m
} aW m � y ;L61 ro •a•' aEi � ~ o� 30m >-' a � Q mom
2 � aE u E a f E ' E o.
c x a a (o E ~ Z
V1 O � m o m W '° a V mt � '° o � o O rco Q OY O
Z � a) v) a V as Z a.. a0 0 ,ac Zc M a, ,ac
LLJ Z Q 0 L N Q m � ate+ c L a 7 a, a a0+ W {�� W 2.
D z = c a, N a, 0, 0 a, a, v� a, ,� a, 0 a,
2 W J N C L d C L to ), L�' = L y N L
(n. F- H N IL H O
ON
a.
o a
o a,
aa,,
mc
ate.+ L to �
a, cp 3 .3 - o v°' �
a.N d O d E a 0 p
m Lni = � m - �.
° co at •p"' a
a' m E ~ E v,
o E
a � O Y " °' > a, 7
a, c
n n
a
7 3 °C d N
u c
p t O N
bd y L
° t L CL vi
L
y 0 a, L ,0 0 a+ Q
yO L O d O L
U C p E a n C w
O U a, W a+ L LA
a i
c
viYa c O
T ' "n � -E E i
m N E
o, O oO o L
a=n`o
O O + C O O O '
L O L IM to N n
n ¢ oa n'u ' a, o
Z a •p CL L O U to
? a+
Q N L tn C E ui Q a, �, 0 a C m
v+ F- a; ° a n c m
N +, 7 C O
a > a+ N L fa N o a, a+
C F O w E x to U a v o o u
m c a, L 3 L u o. °
z 3LoE �
° w-y a 0 Cou z o u W W > c a
= 0. C m a, ao� �c,u CL.0 L m " o"
°
'a O p LL a
CD O` O O d V ° o a
o
J _ p E N T L m O
J '^
u Vf N J N 7 a, >, W C p N u a
E d O O t L m N a, 'O c fo Q > u O
I J a+ +, O a a L W a O a, V
E �. O C 4 H a+ � y 0 E C t a N
a,
° � •ct u tT3 oY c > m W L to > ar 3
LLJ 00-%m 0 3 w x ` � o' O m � r O a u « o a w o c LLJ
acuE � u .� ` o J ,� E ' fo O > 'a Ln
,oLr ,o = Oo, coL L ,o - Ln nth caEa
L '� E c � ,, . V1 O u to z c C .. n a, c . a,
tn n . aC a, .. 7L p,L �a p .. c
a x W ar a, t O u to .� _C' p, E a to tA aL. a, Q to ,a V a+ �. ar O N � — C C O C
C > E a`. w d C L fp L6 c E
VI _ - N N C L y U c fa ,o N V Q•� > c 'en
O L L W O = z V C C O
D` +� Z u a, C 3 Ln to a+ V1i F a, c w 'a O L to 7
in O
0 3 a J W = E f aaC a, vi Z Ln ,� a " E a ° Cw o. O
Y Ia . O W p _ pL O L O J C a� - O C �C—, C
N J O D' to to 41 — �o
'oa' E " OC 'o3 '� Q o —, Q • C c ° o �ncno,
E x � a, a, te a ` V1. '" vo °' °' OE ,o 'ma 'v,
++ C
N V C
a, � }, en Ln 7 O x O u N O — C N a ` 13 a, O eo ?
(o to 0c O n c � O N � a, " 3: Q U' � — ,`a 'a o �0 a a p` a a fa
++ u N O - Ln c 0 >� d
n C
L > tr c � L > ++ u +.
'o n O 3 O' N L — m �,�O a, a, F'. 3 .O >,a a O` O, M �, m a,
ua E O p f- u �o a O ° L L o •N E C a•- >- D
V) 0 'a N m -j 'A - = 0 O a, N �' J }' v LT c 'in E m
Ln c L a u
,o omc � Q � � � Lr ,n a, :. r`o � 2Gc °a � COO � � aa, ,00,
uaaa E � Z °tA a, c Q' LiEEcL oC > cEcm
OJ f as c x to � ' ° a r ° �= x = H0. L� Cr LnQLna3t�
VF- J > n d
U 2 —
o ,
a
p
W
p m 0
aL+ EA CP
IA
a. C d
W C ° o
m Ea y '� a
J � m a
E
_ °u �
N rp 0 II Or-,
J ++
° p '° u
Ae ut C +' L
F
Z r
a c CD
L La -
a 3IA IA c m
° m r A :I- w C C
16 f Vf C '° C 0 +, O
Z Q` w
2 O ar Q a >, m C a, O
O u 03 ° Esc m0 E
O Z O ; a, o > Oo c
U) J O C to `L' '' U CL
O ,o L o L Z m ,�
Y� bd L
W {W/1 C j C >� t ° �O
`0 —
H a 0 0 to C 010 O OP C
Q O a�+ 0 Q` , J C O Q` (A c
acL
M m N N W u m O E - o Y m
= E L y 7 L E E E
N w E ,a cV o• ,4. c
w ° 3 0 IA to ° c cY
N C o a+ W u 7 . O
N Z 'a a a, C L E' L O O of -0
Z O L L M N W 7 , L C C
O 3 c0c �. � a me u �o
:6 .2 Q C 3 C C
4J C " '° O C ' '� 0 M a, tp
J p L 2 O >` O ° m w 3 L
J d +' ,a '_' a, N O a)
Q 0 M r C V d d ,a L >•Z
Z 1�A 0 — N +L+ ` J ~ U C C
J p C , Q aa, J � a, 0 .-W Q E C am .. 0 w a, N L tA m
Z .0 0 c 3 V O` a. 0`,r
F Oo � vai0 ooc � � Eta
a, Q
° Z :, C a, ea w N m W C > L 3 N
` u J Q' ,o
Z > O` O ' O
3 f a>, c •'^ � 'L > a > J '� " � -0
O W p y ° o a> > ea " 0 a 0 >. C a,
> Q.� o E CL m — E °'o
IL � � ° a, ,� omo_. ,o ix Z oo 0w ..
a' � — ` a — C = Q w
C fa L IA a+ (A C Q C 3 L C`ar C
7 0 a, O
pQ � W L .N Q 41 H ° IA aL. Q N N O`
o
_
� F-
Owcv, mo OC N c � > > 0%
0._Q. Q= p W N N a+ VI fa C E — C 0 a
a Z a, CL
.> Q w m O. ut u d vYi fa v O`C a m m J Q z 0 — M +'
m .
J J C y C C (, C +. a, L —� Z N C
O N n d L D` D`a.. O N O O u .o a', W -0 G m C m m
M
CL 0 Q = H H V1 V1 V1 u c C ,�, 01 -0 >, �' '� v tp O L
d FO c o ° = a ° oY3
o
QaF 3 CL � ut
, n ZH
CO � m
O oc U. ^ x
Q LL. Q LA.
W C — O W ^ O
'^ ZN Z II ZM =oo O 2m in a II zM =oo
V, Q Il � � � � _ � _ '� a II � CM
Lu
yC W O=E Ze = yS y OaCi ZO O
J
LL.LL. �o LA. �c�s r2x F 's (" �° m �C°�s
a
X '` �C
o �.
W
uj
z
Z M . Z ,.. .
V 0 1011;
cn
_., loll 11
J
_ N. _
YE
f
z X X Mx
WL L J
ui
LL. LA-
W S N W W S N IL
Z_ z o Y1° N LAJ cm
II Z � ZM = O ' a II ? `'E Z � s
cnC2 ... CL. am O , yO y W CL
W W O O C3 S U6 O O C. S
3
z .
IO a ' -
U O a
c +L.rr} �`, u o ,
J J 1
0 <
U ` p U
W a 1 W a
W W
Z Z
O O
o O
J 0
YE
,
W f W ° X"p
f
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:50 p.m. Steve Fowler July 15, 2008
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18212 - CHARLES JOSEPH
ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 6 net acres of land into 67 residential condominium units in the
proposed Medium Residential district (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of
Base Line Road and San Carmela Court - APN: 1089-581-01. Related Files: General Plan Amendment
DRC2006-00224, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2006-00447, and Development Review
DRC2006-00730.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00730 - CHARLES
JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop 67 residential condominiums on 4.80 net acres of land in
the proposed Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner
of Base Line Road and San Carmela Court - APN: 1089-581-01. Related Files: General Plan
Amendment DRC2006-00224, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2006-00447, and Tentative
Tract SUBTT18212.
Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing to develop 67 market-rate condominium units on
approximately 4.80 acres of undeveloped land located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and
San Carmela Court (north and west of the existing Victoria Village retail center). To facilitate the
proposed project, the applicant is requesting an amendment of the underlying General Plan and the
Victoria Community Plan land designation from Commercial to Residential. In addition, the project
involves a tract map and design review for development of the proposed condominium units. The
proposed name of the development is "The Vineyards at Victoria Place".
The project was originally presented to the Committee on May 1, 2007, as 82 market-rate condominium
units on approximately 6 acres of land. The process was stalled because of a Parking Easement
Agreement that covers the northeast corner of the original project. Since then, a portion of the property
that is affected by the easement has been eliminated from this project and will be master planned. The
project site is a vacant "puzzle piece" shaped parcel surrounded by single-family residential development
to the east and west, condominiums to the north, and a small commercial retail center to the immediate
south. Located further south across Base Line Road is the Filippi Winery. The primary access to the
project site will be from a gated entrance on Atwood Court (off Victoria Park Lane), with emergency fire
department access being provided off San Carmela Court on the west side of the project. The property
has a gradual slope to the southwest and contains no significant vegetation, except for mature trees
along the eastern frontage of the site along Victoria Park Lane. A tree removal request has been
submitted to remove some of the trees from the site to accommodate the project.
The new units will be grouped in 3- and 4-plex buildings. The project offers 20 two-bedroom and
47 three-bedroom units that range in size from 1,400 to 1,600 square feet and have attached two-car
garages. Eighteen visitor parking spaces are provided (18 required) and distributed around the site.
Recreational amenities provided around the site will include a pool, spa, and pocket parks with
barbeques.
The design of the new units is a contemporary interpretation of the Spanish/Mediterranean architectural
style. The new building design features clay tile hip roofs and recessed windows and doors, decorative
tile, and ornamental iron work. The exterior walls will be clad in smooth texture stucco, typically
associated with the proposed style.
DRC ACTION AGENDA
SUBTT18212 AND DRC2006-00730 —CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
July 15, 2008
Page 2
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for the Committee
discussion regarding this project.
Major Issues: The following broad design issue will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this
project.
None. The applicant has worked with staff to develop the proposed plans in accordance with the
applicable development standards of the Victoria Community Plan. On January 17, 2007, the applicant
met with the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force to preview the project and obtain input. The
Task Force was supportive of the project and believed the density and design of the project was
appropriate and complementary to existing improvements in the area.
Secondary Issues: Staff finds the overall architecture proposed for the units to be well done. However,
the architectural success of the project is dependent upon construction details/methods employed by the
builder and the use of high-quality exterior decorative materials. Staff requests the following items:
1. Coordinate the design of the ornamental ironwork to be used for different elements of the project.
The metal work shown at entry gates, for fences, at unit entries, on balconies; etc. do not appear to
be architecturally consistent.
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion.
1. On-site fences or walls shall be constructed of a material more durable than wood. Acceptable
materials include, but not limited to, decorative block, wrought iron, and PVC. All gates and fences
will be constructed of powder-coated metal.
2. All HVAC equipment, including ground mounted equipment, shall be screened from view.
Staff recommendation: Staff recommends that the Secondary Issue identified in this report, and those
identified by the Committee, be discussed with direction being given to the applicant as to what should
be addressed to obtain a recommendation of approval to the Planning Commission.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Henderson
Staff Planner: Steve Fowler
The Committee recommended the project as presented.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
8:10 p.m. Steve Fowler July 15, 2008
UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2007-00798 - VICTORIA COMMONS - SUPERIOR ELECTRICAL
ADVERTISING
Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing a Uniform Sign Program for the Victoria Commons
project which consists of an office and commercial center located at the southeast corner of
Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. Pads 2 and 6 are currently under construction. Pad 2 is
designed to be a 5,100 square foot multi-tenant/restaurant building and Pad 6 is designed to be a
two-story 39,000 square foot multi-tenant office building with WLC architects occupying the entire second
floor. The remaining pads will be reviewed independently under separate reviews.
The sign program will be designed for all six pads. This program consists of three monument signs -two
of which are located on Foothill Boulevard and the other one, which only displays WLC Architects, would
be setback near the front of the building at the entry point off of Rochester Avenue. The applicant's
proposal provides for a good design of the monument signs that reinforces the character of the design of
the buildings without detracting from them. The two monument signs along Foothill Boulevard are over
300 feet apart and located adjacent to each entrance. The face area of the signs is 24 square feet and
the overall sign height is 6 feet.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for the Committee
discussion regarding this project.
Major Issues: The following broad design issue will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this
project.
1. Reduce the number of faces on each monument sign to three. The Uniform Sign Program
application is requesting that the two monument signs on Foothill Boulevard contain 5 spaces for
tenant identification on each face of each sign. The Commission has in the past approved three
signs per face to avoid the appearance of cluttering. The 5 retail pads along Foothill Boulevard,
plus the two to three tenants of the multi-tenant pad that could utilize these signs, totals
approximately 7 signs. The shops will also be able to erect building identification signs on the front
of the buildings, thus not limiting the opportunity to identify their business.
2. Provide a definition of a major tenant that will allow staff to determine which business will be able to
occupy the top space on the monument sign. The definition in the subject program is not
acceptable because it is too vague and, therefore, leaves it up to interpretation.
3. Reduce the number of building identification signs on the office building to only allow one per
elevation. The current request, if approved, would allow 15 building identification signs on this
building. In the past, staff has been advised to limit the number of building identification signs on
office buildings to preserve the architectural elements by not cluttering the building with signage.
Tenants will be able to identify their business with identification on the doors of each tenant space.
Secondary Issues: Staff recommends that size of the sign must be proportional to the scale of the
building and its affixed surface. For shopping centers, 18-inch maximum letter height has been
recommended for building identification signs and 8-inch minimum for monument signs. Major anchor
tenants may have a variation in sign letter style, color, and size.
DRC ACTION AGENDA
DRC2007-00798 —VICTORIA COMMONS
July 15, 2008
Page 2
Staff recommendation: Staff recommends that the Major Issues identified in this report, and those
identified by the Committee, be discussed with direction being given to the applicant as to what should
be addressed to obtain a recommendation of approval to the Planning Commission.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Henderson
Staff Planner: Steve Fowler
John Bibeau and Roy Ramirez, representatives of the applicant, presented a Uniform Sign Program for
the Victoria Commons development on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester
Avenue. The proposal requested four name plates on each of the two monument signs along
Foothill Boulevard. The proposal also requested a total of 15 building identification signs on the office
building.
The Committee members requested that the applicant reduce the total number of faces on each
monument sign to three. The applicant agreed to discuss this with his boss. The Committee then
requested that the applicant reduce the number of signs on the office building. The two sides conversed
and agreed to have one sign on the first story of the north elevation near the west corner and no signs on
the south elevation. They also agreed to allow two signs but four locations where these signs may be
placed on the first floor of the west elevation. The second floor of the west elevation may have one
building identification sign. The Committee agreed to approve the Uniform Sign Program if the applicant
agreed to the terms.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
JULY 21, 2008
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
0& � .
Corkran Nicholson
Assistant Planning Director