Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994/04/05 - Agenda Packet DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES TUESDAY APRIL 5, 1994 5:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA. Committee Members: Larry McNiel John Melcher Dan Coleman Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Heinz Lumpp Dave Barker CONSENT CALENDAR The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION SETTING TIME AND PLACE FOR MEETINGS PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 5:00 p.m. (Scott) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-11 - BHP STEEL U.S.A. , INC. (SUPRACOTE) - A request to construct 93,500 square- foot addition to connect 2 existing industrial buildings in the General Industrial designation (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the north side of Arrow Route at Oakwood Place - APN: 208-961-18 and 19. 5:45 p.m. (Nancy) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-20 - WILKINSON - The development of a 33,000 square foot office building on 3 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Red Oak Street - APN: 209-144-80. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOUR10CE TP DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 5:00 P.M. Consent Calendar April 5, 1994 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION SETTING TIME AND PLACE FOR MEETINGS Design Review Committee Action: The Committee adopted the resolution. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 5:00 P.M. Scott Murphy April 5, 1994 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-11 - BHP STEEL U.S.A. , INC. (SUPRACOTE) - A request to construct 93,500 square foot addition to connect 2 existing industrial buildings in the General Industrial designation (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the north side of Arrow Route at Oakwood Place - APN: 208-961-18 and 19. Background: In 1968, Supracote began operating the initial 48-foot high production line at their existing facility on Arrow Route. During the past two years, Supracote has processed two Development Review applications for expansion of the facility. The 18,786 square foot hazard materials enclosure was approved by the Planning Commission and was subsequently completed. On December 14, 1993, the Planning Commission approved a 26,007 square foot warehouse addition which is presently under construction. The ISP acknowledges Supracote as an existing manufacturing operation that should be allowed to continue their operations and expand. Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing to construct a new production line to supplement their existing line. To accomplish this, the following modifications will occur: 1 . , The applicant has entered into an agreement to purchase the existing industrial building to the west. 2. The production line will be housed in a structure connecting the existing Supracote building to the existing industrial building to the west. 3. The rear 142 feet of the existing industrial building will be removed and be replaced with a 271 foot deep structure that will serve as warehouse area for the new production line. 4. The parking area at the north end of the Supracote and the site to the west is being modified to provide automobile and truck parking to meet the needs of the users. 5. The existing rail spur will be relocated to provide access to the new addition. 6. Additional parking will be provided at the south side of the production line structure. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS CUP 94-11 - BHP STEEL U.S.A. , INC. (SUPRACOTE) - April 5, 1994 Page 2 With the development of the production line, several unique challenges effect the design of the addition: 1. Ideally, the production line structure would be 800-900 feet in length; however, this site will only allow a 475 foot structure. 2. A key element of the production line is the heating and cooling of the sheet steel during the coating process. Because the production line is limited to 475 feet in length, the material heating and cooling will be handled vertically instead of horizontally. To provide the necessary distance, the central portion of the production line structure is 98 feet tall. The southern portion of the structure will be 88 feet in height. By comparison, the existing production line structure is 48 feet high. The ISP limits structures to four stories or 75 feet, whichever is greater, unless approved as a Conditional Use Permit. 3. Large numbers of louvers are provided to assist in the cooling of the product. Vents provided at the roof eave help to expend the 7 million BTU's per hour generated by the process. 4. Given the height of the building, the amount of heat to be expended, and the scrubber and brush requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the furnace stack will be 120 feet tall. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1 . The Commission should determine if the architectural design (i.e. , form, bulk, style, materials, and colors) adequately addresses the height of the structure. 2. The current Industrial Specific Plan requires a 45-foot average landscape setback along Arrow Route. The existing Supracote facility currently has an average landscape setback of roughly 38 feet. In order to bring the landscape setback into closer conformity with City standards, the following options should be considered: a) The row of parallel parking spaces could be eliminated and the landscape area could be expanded; or DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS CUP 94-11 - BHP STREET U.S.A. , INC. (SUPRACOTE) April 5, 1994 Page 3 b) The row of parallel parking spaces could be eliminated, the drive aisle and diagonal parking stalls could be shifted south, and a landscape planter could be provided adjacent to the building. 3. In the past, the Planning Commission has permitted the expansion of the metal building because it was not visible from the public street. Because a portion of the new expansion area fronts Arrow Route, staff recommends that the connection between the existing Supracote building and the industrial building be concrete tilt-up to match the industrial building. 4. As part of the development of the site, the applicant will be repainting the entire facility. White is proposed as the primary building color. The Commission should determine if the white color will help to minimize the visual impacts of the building height. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1 . To help facilitate the transition between the Supracote building and the industrial building, an arbor could be incorporated onto the Supracote building that will pick up the geometric pattern of the industrial building windows. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the application with modifications. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Scott Murphy The Design Review Committee reviewed the application and recommended approval subject to the following: 1 . The west elevation should be designed with a finish similar to the existing concrete tilt-up building. The Committee suggested the use of a smooth metal finish. 2. The color palette proposed is acceptable. 3. Landscaping should be provided adjacent to the building along the south elevation. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 5:45 p.m. Nancy Fong April 5, 1994 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-20 - WILKINSON - The development of a 33,000 square foot office building on 3 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Red Oak Street - APN: 209-144-80. Background: At the March 9, 1994 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the above project and continued it to the April 13, 1994 meeting. The Commission raised several design issues as well as the inaccuracies among the different plans such as elevations, perspective of the front elevation, floor plan, site and landscape plans. The Commission directed the applicant to clear up the inaccuracies, revise the elevations to address their design concerns and submit them for the Design Review Committee review at the April 5, 1994 meeting. Attached for the Committee's reference is a copy of the March 9, 1994 Commission minutes. The applicant has revised the development plans according to the discussions he had with staff and Commissioner Melcher at a meeting on March 14, 1994. The following section of the report describes the revisions to the project. , Staff Convents: 1. North Elevation: The first set of columns and horizontal panel is projected a distance of 4 feet while the second set (closest to the triangular element) is projected a distance of 10 feet from the building wall. All the columns and horizontal panels are sandblasted materials and are provided with soffits. At the west side of the triangular element, a vestibule is proposed. According to the applicant, the tenant, San Bernardino County Department of Public Social Services, requested the vestibule to address the wind issue. The outer set of glass windows and doors are recessed 3 feet from the horizontal panel while the main entry doors are at the building line. 2. East and West Elevations: Instead of the 9-inch pop-out building wall, the same columns and horizontal panels with soffits as in the north elevation are proposed. The 3 columns in the middle are projected a distance of 4 feet and the set of transitional columns are projected a foot from the building wall. 3. South Elevations: This elevation is unchanged except for the 4-foot wall panels that are turned into 4-foot columns consistent with the other elevations. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DR 93-20 - WILKINSON April 5, 1994 Page 2 Comment: The floor plan, site and landscape plans are co-ordinated to reflect accurately the revisions to the elevations. One minor item that the Committee may consider is to decide on whether the outer set of windows and doors of the vestibule at the north elevation should use the same sapphire blue glass or . clear glass for visibility into the main entry. Staff Recommendation: Staff believes that the applicant has revised the plans to meet the concerns raised by the Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Nancy Fong The Committee recommended approval of the revised elevations with the condition that the outer set of windows and doors of the vertibule at the north elevation be of clear glass. Attachment: Planning Commission Minutes dated March 9, 1994 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 1 April 5, 1994 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Secretary