HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994/05/31 - Agenda Packet r
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES
TUESDAY May 31 , 1994 5:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
RAINS ROOM
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Committee Members: Larry McNiel John Melcher Dan Coleman
Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Heinz Lumpp Dave Barker
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items are expected to. be routine and non-controversial. Typically
they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a
previous meeting.
NO ITEMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED
PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS
This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to
an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not
legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting
for public input.
5:00 p.m.
(Scott) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-08 - CAPELLINO - A request to construct a
27,280 square foot building on a 1.6 acre parcel in the General
Industrial designation (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Specific Plan,
located on the north side of Tacoma Street between White Oak Avenue
and Oakwood Place - APN: 209-461-03 and 04.
5:40 p.m.
(Scott) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-15 - CAMPOS - A
request to construct a 1 ,200 square foot cafe and convert 4 single
family residences to commercial uses- in the Specialty Commercial
designation (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan,
located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and
Klusman Avenues - APN: 208-153-08, 09, 10, 111 , and 23.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State
law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on
the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a
subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual.
ADJOURNMENT
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
5:00 p.m. Scott Murphy May 31 , 1994
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-08 - CAPELLINO - A request to construct a 27,280 square foot
building on a 1.6 acre parcel in the General Industrial designation (Subarea 8) of
the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the north side of Tacoma Street between
White Oak Avenue and Oakwood Place - APN: 209-461-03 and 04.
Background:
On January 8, 1992, the Planning Commission approved the Master Plan and Phase 1
development plans for the 52-acre parcel at the southeast corner of Arrow Route
and White Oak Avenue. Subsequently, the applicant has completed construction of 3
buildings within Phase 1 and all the street improvements. The applicant also
received Planning Commission approval for the construction of a 29,580 square foot
industrial building at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Oakwood Place.
Both the completed buildings and the approved building are designed with concrete
tilt-up panels with smooth and sandblasted finishes, brick veneer, and green
glazing.
Design Parameters:
The site proposed is composed of Parcel 10 of the original parcel map and a
portion of 11. The applicant is proposing a lot line adjustment with the
( application. The site was previously graded with the construction of Phase 1 and
the street improvements.
The applicant is proposing a building that incorporates building materials used on
the previous buildings. The entry area utilizes sandblasted concrete, green
glazing, and brick veneer. The plaza area at the southeast corner of the building
picks up on the sandblasted concrete, brick veneer, and glazing to a lesser
degree. The brick elements at the entry are extended out from the main building
plane roughly 4 to 6 inches to provide relief. The south elevation is sandblasted
concrete. Sandblasted areas are proposed for the east and west elevations as
well.
Staff Convents:
The following staff comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following design issues will be the focus of Committee
discussion regarding this project:
1. In order to make the entry more prominent, the glazing at the southwest
corner of the building should extend to the height of the adjacent brick
column elements.
2. Textured pavement treatment should be provided at the project entry
�, consistent with the adjacent projects.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
DR 93-15 - CAMPOS
May 31 , 1994 <<
Page 4
4. The inconsistencies between the various drawings should be corrected. The
conflicts between what is existing and what is proposed should be
eliminated. The plans should reflect the design intended upon completion of
the project.
5. The building details should be re-evaluated for consistency with the theme
being portrayed (e.g. , the half-round windows on the cafe are not consistent
with the building style) .
6. The plans for the house conversions should reflect interior changes proposed
by the applicant.
7. The parking spaces along the entry drive should be eliminated.
The Committee recommended that the Variance and Landmark Designation applications
submitted in conjunction with the Development Review application be scheduled for
Planning Commission and Historic Preservation Commission consideration at the next
available meeting.
r
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
1
May 31, 1994
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 6: 50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
Secretary