Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010/10/13 - Agenda Packet - (Adjourned to Workshop) Planning Commission • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION Liss J AGENDA CUCAMONGA OCTOBER 13, 2010 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL To ORDER Roll Call Chairman Munoz_ Vice Chairman Howdyshell Fletcher Wimberly_ Oaxaca _ • I II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 22, 2010 Regular Meeting Minutes IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00493 - GB ARCHITECTS - A request to construct two office/professional buildings of approximately 27,000 square feet on three vacant parcels with a combined area of 2.5 acres in the Office/Professional (OP) District located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route - APNs: 0208-811-59, -58, and -60. Related file: Uniform Sign Program DRC2010-00092. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - Infill Development Projects. • 1 of 5 ;1/4. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 13, 2010 RANCHO CUCAMONGA B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC -A proposal to develop an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 12 buildings and 12 parcels on a triangular shaped property of approximately 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 3 located about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street; APNs: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, and 0209-161-24. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008- 00681. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794- DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC -A proposal to subdivide a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet(20.7 acres) into twelve (12) parcels in conjunction with the development of an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 12 buildings in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 3 • located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue; APNs: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, and 0209-161-24. Related files: Development Review DRC2007-00551, Minor Exception DRC2008- 00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00314 - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL -A proposal to demolish an existing 5,489 square foot building that was formerly used as a bank located at 9709 Base Line Road and construct a Taco Bell fast food restaurant with drive-thru of 2,432 square feet at an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue - APN: 1077-011-45. Related files: Development Review DRC2010-00314D, Variance DRC2010-00565, Tree Removal Permit DRC2010-00564, and Uniform Sign Program No. 4 Amendment DRC2010-00404. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA review and qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303- New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - as the proposed fast food restaurant is under 2,500 square feet in gross floor area. • 2 of 5 f • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Ly OCTOBER 13, 2010 RANCHO CUCAMONGA E. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00314D- HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL - A proposal to demolish an existing 5,489 square foot building that was formerly used as a bank located at 9709 Base Line Road and construct a Taco Bell fast food restaurant with drive-thru of 2,432 square feet at an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue - APN: 1077-011-45. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00314,Variance DRC2010-00565, Tree Removal Permit DRC2010-00564, and Uniform Sign Program No. 4 Amendment DRC2010-00404. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA review and qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures -as the proposed fast food restaurant is under 2,500 square feet in gross floor area. • F. VARIANCE DRC2010-00565-HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL-A request to allow an encroachment into the required street setbacks along Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road in conjunction with a proposal to demolish an existing 5,489 square foot building that was formerly used as a bank located at 9709 Base Line Road and construct a Taco Bell fast food restaurant with drive-thru of 2,432 square feet at an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue. APN: 1077-011-45. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00314, Development Review DRC2010-00314D, Tree Removal Permit DRC2010-00564, and Uniform Sign Program #4 Amendment DRC2010-00404. V. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS • 3of5 .., ,ic se.0 i • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA �s- 1a. OCTOBER 13, 2010 RANCHO CUCAMONGA VII. ADJOURNMENT I The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING TO DISCUSS PRE- APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2010-00530- NEVIS HOMES I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 7, 2010, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. • IEIf you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. • 4 of 5 S '' PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA � OCTOBER 13, 2010 RANCHO CUCAMONGA If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS • Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,124 for maps and$2,231 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us • 5 of 5 N Vicinity Map Planning Commission Meeting October 13 , 2010 1 i r'J III '= Q II d C a) j aimtta d IS 1 J 15 o `\ . ` - - • lath St"'11 i Base Line r ir Base Line fie Church 41.111/►���rAl D, E, and F 5 ` thr .� �� Church elit4'�. -▪ Foothill Foothill rF *�'�.1�__ A Arrow c � e▪Arrow 5 = Jersey 3 w 8th E a° 0. > _ �� W ......m.Luj U2 6th _n ° 1 6th N BandC a = _ R 4 A th 11 4th is` * Meeting Location: • City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: October 13, 2010 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00493 - GB ARCHITECTS - A request to construct two office/professional buildings of approximately 27,000 square-feet on three vacant parcels with a combined area of 2.5 acres in the Office/Professional (OP) District, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APN's: 0208-811-59, -58, and -60. Related file: Uniform Sign Program DRC2010-00092. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - Infill Development Projects. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: • Site - Vacant — Office/Professional (OP) District North - (Part) Legal Non-conforming Residence — Office/Professional (OP) District (Part) Vacant - Office/Professional (OP) District South - Offices — General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3) East Offices for the San Bernardino County Board of Education and a Gas Station (Inactive) — Low-Medium (LM) District West - Single-family Residences — Low (L) Residential B. General Plan Designations: Site - Office North - Office South - General Industrial • East - Low Medium Residential West - Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The subject property is a site comprised of three (3) parcels located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route (Exhibit B) with a combined area of approximately 108,900 square feet (2.5 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 611 feet (north to south) by about 180 feet (east to west). The site is undeveloped and until recently was used for agricultural purposes as a strawberry field. To the north and west of the site are single-family residences. To the south, across Arrow Route, is an office complex of four (4) buildings. To the east, across Archibald Avenue, are administrative offices for the San • Bernardino County Board of Education and an inactive gas station. The zoning of the property and the property to the north is Office Professional (OP) District; the properties to the east and Item A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS October 13, 2010 Page 2 • west are zoned Low-Medium (LM) and Low (L) Residential District, respectively. The zoning of the properties to the south is General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3). D. Parking Calculations: The parking calculations for the proposed buildings is per Section 17.12.040(B)(1)(c), (B)(4)(a), and (B)(5)(a) and (b) of the Development Code. Type of Use Floor Area (SF) Parking Ratio No. of Spaces Required Office Buildings (2) 27,284 Office 18,017 1/250 72 Medical Office 6,006 1/250 30 Restaurant 2,174 1/100 22 Fast Food Restaurant 1,087 1/75 . 15 Total Parking Required 139 Total Parking Provided 141 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to construct two-story office/professional buildings with a combined floor area of approximately 27,000 square feet (Exhibit C). The two identical buildings will be of wood frame construction. The tenants are unspecified but it is anticipated that most of the tenants will be administrative/professional offices. Included as potential tenants are two restaurants and one fast food restaurant. The buildings will have thirteen (13) • tenant spaces each — a subdivision of the property for condominium purposes is not proposed at this time. The site layout is arranged with the buildings situated on the west side of the site while the parking area will be along the street frontage of Archibald Avenue. Additional parking will be located along the street frontage at Arrow Route and between the two buildings. This is contrary to the general design goal of the City to have buildings located close to the street with the parking area(s) `screened' behind the buildings. However, during a Pre-Application Workshop held on February 27, 2008, (related file: DRC2008-00045) that was submitted by a different applicant, the Planning Commission reviewed a proposal for the site that had a similar layout and deemed it acceptable as the narrow depth of the project site (measured east to west) limits other building plotting options. Furthermore, they concluded that the proposed building locations will mitigate potential noise and glare disturbances that might be generated in the parking lot and might affect the residences to the west. Four of the tenants on the first floor at the east side (or front) of each building will have their respective primary entrances opening to the exterior of the building on the east elevation facing Archibald Avenue. The other two first floor tenants and the tenant spaces located at the west side (or rear) and on the second floor of each building will be through a common lobby (Exhibit F). Access to the site will be via two driveways to be located at the southwest and northeast corners of the site at Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue, respectively. Although there is no minimum requirement landscape coverage in this development district, 35 percent of the project site will be landscaped. B. Floor/Area Analysis: Per Chapter 2, Figure LU-2, the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) in the Office land use category is 40 percent. The net area of the project site is approximately • A-2 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS October 13, 2010 • Page 3 108,900 square feet. Following the completion of the two office buildings, the combined building floor area will be 27,284 square feet. Therefore, the FAR for this site will be 25 percent. C. Land Use Compatibility: The project will be consistent with the site's development district and the surrounding development districts. The most sensitive land uses adjoining the project site are the single-family residences to the west. However, staff does not expect any negative impacts as office uses are conducted indoors and generally operate during regular business hours. Also, because of the location of the buildings on the site and overall site layout, the buildings will serve as a `buffer' between the residential properties and the parking lot (and associated impacts such as parking lot noise and glare from parking lot lighting). Potential land uses that have more significant impacts such as fast food restaurants require a Conditional Use Permit and a public hearing. At the time such uses are proposed, staff will conduct a thorough analysis to establish additional mitigations, if necessary, to ensure compatibility with the neighborhood. D. Conceptual Master Plan (Access): As discussed previously, the properties to the north are partially developed with a legal non-conforming residence but are otherwise vacant. These properties have the potential for similar office development as the proposed project. To ensure coordination with this potential development that will minimize vehicle circulation problems and eliminate redundant driveways in close proximity to each other, the applicant at • the City's direction has designed the north-south primary drive aisle to terminate at the common north property line in anticipation of connecting with a future drive aisle on those properties. A corresponding access easement will be provided to allow the adjoining property owners and their tenants/customers access to the driveway proposed on Archibald Avenue (Exhibit D). E. Neighborhood Meeting: On February 17, 2010, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting at the Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center at 9791 Arrow Route. There were five persons in attendance. These individuals live in the residences to the west of the project and were generally optimistic about the project. Questions were addressed by the applicant to the attendees satisfaction; no negative issues or concerns were raised that would require follow-up discussion. F: Grading and Technical Review Committees: The project was reviewed by the Grading and Technical Review Committees twice. The first review occurred on April 6, 2010, and at that time the Committee did not accept the project because of several revisions/corrections that needed to be completed. The applicant revised the submittal and returned for a second review on August 3, 2010. Following their review of the revisions/corrections, the Committees • accepted the application and recommend approval. Their conditions have been incorporated •into the Resolution of Approval. G. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Granger) four times. The initial review occurred on April 6, 2010, and at that time they deemed it unacceptable for forwarding to the Planning Commission for • review and action. The Committee believed that the architecture of the buildings was A-3 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00493— GB ARCHITECTS October 13, 2010 Page 4 • incompatible with the existing development that surrounds the project site and, in general, with what would be expected in the City. Particularly, the massing and form were deemed incompatible with the residential neighborhood to the west. They also indicated that the architecture lacked warmth because of the proposed materials and finishes. The Committee requested that the applicant consider introducing wood as a possible material (Exhibit K). As the applicant made the requested revisions, the proposal was periodically reviewed by staff. To ensure that the proposal was satisfactory to the Committee, staff forwarded the project to the Committee twice for a 'progress update.' The first of these meetings was on May 18, 2010. At that time the Committee concluded that the applicant was generally making progress in the right direction. The principle concern was that following the latest revisions the buildings appeared to be residential structures. The applicant was instructed to pursue a design that had the characteristics of an office professional building. With the exception of the two end units of each building, the applicant was directed to eliminate exterior access and, instead, route access to each tenant space via a common lobby. Lastly, the Committee indicated that the area around,the lobby entrance of each building should be significantly enhanced to reflect their importance as the main entrance (Exhibit L). The Committee conducted a second 'progress update' on July 6, 2010. The latest proposal has the architectural form and massing of the design that was originally submitted for the initial review of the Committee. However, the applicant significantly revised the details by simplifying the design theme so that there are less contrasting elements. Also, the applicant • incorporated wood to enhance the 'warmth' of the architecture and stackstone at the center tower element to establish its significance as the main entrance into the building. The applicant also removed the majority of the exterior store front doors and relocated the entrances of each tenant space to the lobby of the building as previously directed. The Committee accepted this design with only slight modifications (Exhibit M). The Committee reviewed the proposal for the final time on August 3, 2010. As the architecture of the proposal was deemed acceptable at the meeting held on July 6, 2010, this meeting was generally for the purpose of reviewing the other aspects of the project including site layout, landscaping, and the draft uniform sign program. During this review, the project was determined to be acceptable for forwarding to the Planning Commission. The Committee recommends approval with conditions that have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval (Exhibits H and N). H. Uniform Sign Program DRC2010-000921: The applicant submitted a draft Uniform Sign Program for review by the City to ensure that any proposed signs would be compatible with the architecture of the buildings and in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance. This Sign Program was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Granger) and the Committee recommended approval to the Planning Director for final approval. I. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Infill Development Projects - as the project site is consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations, applicable General Plan policies, • A-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS October 13, 2010 41) Page 5 and zoning regulations; the project site has an overall area of less than 2.5 acres; the project site has no value as habitat for environmentally sensitive species; would have no significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site will be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2009-00493 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, 7rmiu4 R. 44.41i/o Jame i. Troyer, AICP Planning Director • Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Map Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Conceptual Master Plan (showing access to property to the north) Exhibit E - Grading Plan Exhibit F - First and Second Floor Plans (both buildings are identical) Exhibit G - Roof Plan (both buildings are identical) Exhibit H - Building Elevations (both buildings are identical) Exhibit I - Building Sections (both buildings are identical) Exhibit J - Bus Shelter Exhibit K - Design Review Committee (04/06/2010) Action Comments Exhibit L Design Review Committee (05/18/2010) Action Comments Exhibit M - Design Review Committee (07/06/2010) Action Comments Exhibit N - Design Review Committee (08/03/2010) Action Comments Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2009-00493 • A-5 • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:00 p.m. Mike Smith April 6, 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS - A request to construct two office/professional buildings of 25,600 square feet on three vacant parcels with a combined area of 2.5 acres in the Office/Professional (OP) District, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route - APN: 0208-811-59, -58, and -60. Related file: Uniform Sign Program DRC2010-00092. Desiqn Parameters: The subject property is a site comprised of three (3) parcels located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, with a combined area of about 108,900 square feet (2.5 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 611 feet (north to south) by about 180 feet (east to west). The site is undeveloped and until recently was used for agricultural purposes as a strawberry field. To the west of the site, are single-family residences and to the north, it is vacant. To the south, across Arrow Route, is an office complex of four (4) buildings. To the east, across Archibald Avenue, are administrative offices for the San Bernardino County Board of Education and an inactive gas station. The zoning of the property and the property to the north is Office Professional (OP) District; the properties to the east and west are zoned Low-Medium (LM) and Low (L) Residential District, respectively. The zoning of the properties to the south is General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3). The applicant proposes to construct two, two-story office/professional buildings, with a combined floor • area of 25,600 square feet. The two identical buildings will be of wood frame construction. The tenants are unspecified, but the mix is anticipated to consist mostly of administrative/professional offices. The buildings will have fourteen (14) tenant spaces each with eight (8) on the first floor and six (6) on the second floor. The subdivision of the property for condominium purposes is not proposed at (his time. The site layout is arranged with the buildings situated on the west side of the site, while the parking area will be along the street frontage of Archibald Avenue. Additional parking will be located along the street frontage at Arrow Route and between the twd buildings. This layout is contrary to the general design goal of the City to have buildings located close to the street with the parking area(s) screened behind the buildings. However, during a Pre-Application Workshop held on February 27, 2008 (Related File: DRC2008-00045) that was submitted by a different applicant, the Planning Commission reviewed a proposal for the site that had a similar layout and deemed it acceptable, as the narrow depth of the project site (measured east to west) limits other building plotting options, and the proposed building locations will mitigate potential noise and glare disturbances that might be generated in the parking lot and might affect the residences to the west. The general arrangement of both buildings will have a prominent entrance at the center of each east elevation of the building that leads to a lobby. The first floor tenants at the east side (or front) of each building will have their respective primary entrances opening to the exterior of the building on the east elevation facing Archibald Avenue. The entrances to the tenant spaces located at the west side (or rear) and on the second floor of each building will be through the lobby. The contemporary architectural theme of each building will be distinctive and unique as it employs bold horizontal and vertical elements with a mix of tile, stone, and glass. The buildings are generally well-proportioned, and the application of materials, finish, and trim are equal on all elevations. The • primary entrance will be defined by a tower element finished with stone veneer and incorporating a glass storefront that extends up to the full height of the lobby. Storefront glass is generously provided on all • EXHIBIT K A-19 DRC ACTION AGENDA • DRC2009-00493 —GB ARCHITECTS April 6, 2010 Page 2 • elevations. The design of the parapets at the second floor at the east and west elevations incorporates an unconventional combination of an angled and horizontal top edge. They are finished with a combination of two different tile veneers. As each building is only one-story at their respective north and south ends, the parapet steps down so that the general form of each vertical form of the building is well-articulated. Other features of the buildings include vertical columns finished with stone veneer. The outside edge of these columns, repeating the theme set by the angled parapets, project diagonally so that the face of each at the top is projected further from the wall plane of the building than at the bottom. The bus shelter will have support columns that are similar. - Access to the site will be via two driveways to be located at the southwest and northeast corners of the site at Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue, respectively. The building is required to have 141 parking stalls; 141 parking stalls will be provided. Although there is no minimum requirement for landscape coverage in this development district, 35 percent of the project site will be landscaped. The applicant has provided a conceptual master plan showing the potential location of a driveway that will connect the project site and the adjoining property to the north, thus minimizing the number of driveways on Archibald Avenue. An easement in favor of the owner of the property to the north to allow access at the proposed driveway on Archibald Avenue will be a condition of approval. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. The angled parapets and vertical columns are not typical but do distinguish the buildings from other. • office buildings that have been approved and constructed in the City. The Committee may want to discuss these features with the applicant. Staff believes that these angled features are generally inconsistent with the other parts of the building. The quality of the architecture will not be diminished by using conventional straight horizontal parapets and vertical columns. Furthermore, at the lowest point of the angled parapet, the height of it will only be 2 feet 10 inches, which is insufficient to screen all roof-mounted equipment. 2. The use of glass on the west elevation, particularly on the second floor, shall be minimized to ensure that during the late afternoon hours glare from the setting sun does not reflect back towards the residences located immediately west of the project site. The glass on the first floors can remain as any light that would be reflected off of the glass on the first floors would be blocked by an existing perimeter wall. Furthermore, the site is slightly lower than the properties to the west, which will reduce the potential for adverse glare. 3. The height of the parapet walls at the northernmost and southernmost portions of the second floor is only 1 foot 6 inches high. Similarly, the height of the parapet walls at the northernmost and southernmost portions of the first floor is only 2 feet high. In both cases, this will be insufficient to screen roof-mounted equipment. Therefore, any HVAC or similar equipment for the second floor tenant spaces at these locations shall be in an enclosed space within the building (with applicable venting as needed). The Committee should verify with the applicant that the enclosed HVAC equipment is a viable option, or require that the parapet on both floors be raised to an adequate height to permit screening. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the • Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. A-20 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS April 6, 2010 • Page 3 1. Landscaping shall be intensified along the street frontages to minimize visibility of the parking lot. Options for discussion include low planter walls with shrubs; undulating berms along the street frontages within the landscape setback and landscape areas that are at least 3 feet in height (at the maximum height); dense plantings; or a combination of these. 2. The new block wall at the common property line between the project site and 9649 Calle Vejar and 8378/8398 Archibald Avenue shall be constructed of concrete masonry units with a decorative finish such as stucco. The east face of the existing walls along the common property lines between the project site and 9648 Calle Vejar and 9648/9649 Friant Street shall be refinished to match the new walls. 3. The new trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. 4. The Southem California Edison transformer box shall be located at the northeast corner of the site. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices, etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. 2. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be placed 5 feet from • the right-of-way and shall be screened on three sides behind a 4-foot high wall designed to match the building. 3. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a similarly dark color. 4. Decorative paving shall be provided at all vehicular access points onto the site. • 5. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 6. All downspouts on all elevations shall be routed through the interior of the building. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the architecture and provide additional input and direction as appropriate. Staff also recommends that the project be approved, subject to the revisions discussed above and any additional comments from the Committee, which can be verified by staff, and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed the proposal and deemed it to be unacceptable. The Committee stated that the architecture of the buildings is incompatible with the existing development that surrounds the project site and, in general, with what would be expected in the City. The architecture is lacking warmth because of the proposed materials and finishes. The Committee indicated that the applicant should consider introducing wood as a possible material. The massing and form of the buildings were unacceptable and stood in contrast to the residential development to the west. Lastly, the Committee recommended against making both buildings identical to each other. The applicant was directed to substantially revise the proposal and resubmit it for a follow-up review by the Committee at a later date. - Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger • Staff Planner: Mike Smith A-21 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith May 18, 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00493 GB ARCHITECTS - A request to construct two office/professional buildings of 25,600 square feet on 3 vacant parcels, with a combined area of 2.5 acres in the Office/Professional (OP) District, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route - APN: 0208-811-59, -58, and -60. Related file: Uniform Sign Program DRC2010-00092. • Background: This application was previously reviewed by the Design Review Committee on February 2, 2010. The Committee reviewed the proposal and deemed it to be unacceptable. The Committee stated that the architecture of the buildings is incompatible with the existing development that surrounds the project site and, in general, with what would be expected in the City. The architecture is lacking warmth because of the proposed materials and finishes. The Committee indicated that the applicant should consider introducing wood as a possible material. The massing and form of the buildings were unacceptable and stood in contrast to the residential development to the west. Lastly, the Committee recommended against making both buildings identical to each other. The applicant was directed to substantially revise the proposal and resubmit it for.a follow-up review by the Committee at a later date. • In the interim period between February 2, 2010, and now, the applicant has been working on the revisions. The applicant has been making incremental revisions and submitting the preliminary designs to the Planning Department for discussion. In response, staff has been directing him,to further refine the design by incorporating various trim, features, and other elements. To ensure that the proposal will be satisfactory to the Committee, staff has concluded that the Committee should review the applicant's • • progress and provide comments. Staff Comments: The following items are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. 1. Is the overall design theme acceptable? • 2. Is the quality of the design consistent with the Committee's expectations? • • 3. Is the applicant using and applying appropriate trim, elements, and features to match the design theme? • • 4. Is the massing and scale acceptable for the site? 5. Are two identical buildings acceptable, or should there be a clear difference between the two buildings? Staff Recommendation: None. This is a review of the applicant's progress. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed the applicant's revised proposal and concluded that the applicant was generally making progress in the right direction. The principal concern was that the revisions made the buildings look too much like residential structures, such as apartments, when they needed to look more like offices. The Committee instructed the applicant to strive for a high caliber design that reflects a warm, office professional building. The Committee also indicated that the • architecture should not focus on providing multiple exterior entrances that are typical of retail projects considering that the underlying land uses that are allowed in the zoning district are office-intensive and retail opportunities are limited. The number of individual storefront entrances, therefore, should .be • EXHIBIT L A-22 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2009-00493 —GB ARCHITECTS • May 18, 2010 Page 2 minimized. In order to reinforce the office professional district, the entrance to each tenant space should be via the interior of the building with access to the outside through a common lobby. The applicant requested that the two end units of each building be allowed to have direct access to the outside; this request was accepted by the Committee. Lastly, the Committee indicated that the area around the lobby entrance of each building should be significantly enhanced to reflect their importance as the main entrance. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner Mike Smith • • • • • • • • A-23 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Mike Smith July 6, 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00493 GB ARCHITECTS - A request to construct two office/professional buildings of 25,600 square feet on three vacant parcels with a combined area of 2.5 acres in the Office/Professional (OP) District, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route - APN: 0208-811-59, -58, and -60. Related file: Uniform Sign Program DRC2010-00092. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Background: This application was previously reviewed by the Design Review Committee on February 2, 2010. The Committee reviewed the proposal and deemed it to be unacceptable. The Committee stated that the architecture of the buildings is incompatible with the existing development that surrounds the project site and in general with what would be expected in the City. The architecture is lacking warmth because of the proposed materials and finishes. The Committee indicated that the applicant should consider introducing wood as a possible material. The massing and form of the buildings were unacceptable and stood in contrast to the residential development to the west. Lastly, the Committee recommended against making both buildings identical to each other. The applicant was directed to substantially revise the proposal and resubmit it for a follow-up review by the Committee at a later date. • On May 18, 2010, the Committee conducted a "status update" of the applicant's revised proposal and concluded that the applicant was generally making progress in the right direction. The principal concern was that the revisions made the buildings look too much like residential structures, such as apartments. The Committee indicated that the buildings must convey office/professional architecture. The Committee instructed the applicant to strive for a high caliber design that reflects a warm office professional building. • The Committee also indicated that the architecture should not focus on providing multiple exterior entrances that ate typical of retail projects, considering that the underlying land uses that are allowed in the zoning district are office-intensive and retail opportunities are limited. The number of individual storefront entrances, therefore, should be minimized. In order to reinforce the office professional district, the entrance to each tenant space should be via the interior of the building with access to the outside . through a common lobby. The applicant requested that the two end units of each building be allowed to have direct access to the outside; this request was accepted by the Committee. Lastly, the Committee indicated that the area around the lobby entrance of each building should be significantly enhanced to reflect their importance as the main entrance. In the interim period between May 18, 2010, and now, the applicant has further refined the proposal to incorporate the Committee's comments and direction. The applicant's architect has made changes and submitted the preliminary designs to the Planning Department for discussion. To ensure that the proposal will be satisfactory to the Committee, staff is requesting that the Committee review the applicant's progress and provide comments. Staff Comments: The following items are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. • • 1. Is the overall design theme acceptable? • 2. Is the quality of the design consistent with the Committee's expectations? • • EXHIBIT ICI A 24 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS • July 6, 2010 Page 2 3. Is the applicant using and applying appropriate trim, elements, and features to match the design theme? 4. Is the massing and scale acceptable for the site? Staff Recommendation: None. This is a review of the applicant's progress. Design Review Committee Action: • The Committee reviewed several variations of the applicant's revised proposal for each building and concluded that the best version was "Idea No. 3." The form and massing of this version is generally similar to that of the proposal that was first submitted for Committee review on April 6, 2010. However, the applicant has significantly revised the details. The changes include the elimination of most of the vertical elements that visually interrupted the horizontal elements with the center_'tower' element becoming the only significant vertical feature and incorporation of conventional parapets in lieu of the • angled parapets. Also, the applicant proposes the use of different materials that are `warmer' including the use of wood siding and mullions instead of tile and metal mullions. Stackstone will be used . principally at the tower element to establish its significance as the main entrance into the building. The applicant also removed the majority of the exterior store front doors and relocated the entrances of each • tenant space (where the change occurred) to the interior of the building. The applicant requested that both buildings be allowed to be identical, and this request was accepted by .the Committee. The Committee identified several issues that the applicant needed to be aware of: a) the presence of glass on the west elevation should be minimized to minimize the potential impact of reflected sunlight on the residences to the west of the project site, and b) the wood siding may impact the location and installation options for signs on the building. The applicant indicated that he would address both issues accordingly. This application will be reviewed at a follow-up Design Review Committee meeting at a later date for action and recommendation to the Planning Commission. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Burnett Staff Planner Mike Smith • • • A-25 • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:40 p.m. Mike Smith August 3, 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS - A request to construct two office/professional buildings of 25,600 square feet on three vacant parcels with a combined area of 2.5 acres in the Office/Professional (OP) District, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route - APN: 0208-811-58, -59, and -60. Related file: Uniform Sign Program DRC2010-00092. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Background: This application was previously reviewed by the Design Review Committee on April 6, 2010. The Committee reviewed the proposal and deemed it to be unacceptable. The Committee stated that the architecture of the buildings is incompatible with the existing development that surrounds the project site, and in general, with what would be expected in the City. The architecture was considered to be lacking warmth because of the proposed materials and finishes. The Committee indicated that the applicant should consider introducing wood as a possible material. The massing and . form of the buildings were unacceptable and stood in contrast to the residential development to the west. Lastly, the Committee recommended against making both buildings identical to each other. The applicant was directed to substantially revise the proposal and resubmit it for a follow-up review by the Committee at a later date (Exhibit A). • In the interim period, since that Committee review meeting, the applicant submitted to the Committee for follow-up "progress reviews" of his draft revisions to the original proposal. The first was on May 18, 2010, and the second was on July 6, 2010. During the first update, the Committee concluded that the applicant was generally making progress in the right direction. However, with some of the revisions made, the buildings look too much like residential structures when they needed to look more like offices. The Committee emphasized the need for a design that has the appearance of an office professional building - the architecture should not focus on providing multiple exterior entrances that are typical of retail projects considering that the underlying land uses that are allowed in the zoning district are office-intensive and retail opportunities are limited. The Committee directed the applicant to minimize the number of individual storefront entrances and have the entrance to each tenant space within the interior of the building with access to the outside through a common lobby. The applicant requested that the two end units of each building be allowed to have direct access to the outside; this request was accepted by the Committee. Lastly, the Committee indicated that the area around the lobby entrance of each building should be significantly enhanced to reflect their importance as the main entrance (Exhibit B). During the second update, the Committee reviewed several updated variations of the applicant's revised proposal and chose a version where the form and massing of this version is generally similar to that of the proposal that was first submitted for Committee review on April 6, 2010. However, the applicant had significantly revised the details. The changes included the elimination of most of the vertical elements that visually interrupted the horizontal elements with the center tower element becoming the only significant vertical feature and incorporation of conventional parapets in lieu of the angled parapets. Also, the applicant proposed the use of different materials that are warmer including the use of wood siding and mullions instead of tile and metal mullions. Stackstone veneer would be used principally at the tower element to establish its significance as the main entrance into the building. The applicant also emoved the majority of the exterior storefront doors and relocated the entrances of each tenant space • EXHIBIT N A26 DRC ACTION AGENDA • DRC2009-00493 —GB ARCHITECTS • August 3, 2010 Page 2 • (where this change occurred) to the interior of the building as directed. The applicant requested that both buildings be allowed to be identical and this request was accepted by the Committee. The Committee identified several issues that the applicant needed to be aware of: a) the presence of glass on the west elevation should be minimized to reduce the potential impact of reflected sunlight on the residences to the west of the project site, and b) the wood siding may impact the location and installation options for signs on the building. The applicant indicated that he would address both issues accordingly (Exhibit C). As part of the revisions to the architecture, the applicant has increased the overall floor area for both buildings from 25,572 square feet to 27,284 square feet and revised each footprint of the buildings at the north and south ends of each building•(Exhibits D and E). He has also adjusted the land uses (and corresponding parking calculations) to accommodate the potential for two restaurants instead of one restaurant as previously proposed. This has not resulted in an increase in parking that is required —the amount required remains at 141 parking stalls. The amount of parking provided also remains at 141 parking stalls. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. The use of glass on the west elevation, particularly on the second .floor, shall be minimized to ensure that during the late afternoon hours glare from the setting sun does not reflect back towards • the residences located immediately west of the project site. A potential solution is to reduce the vertical dimension of each window on the second floor. The windows on the first floors can remain as-is because any light that would be reflected off of the glass on the first floors would be blocked by an existing perimeter wall. Furthermore, the site is slightly lower than the properties to the west, which will reduce the potential for adverse glare reflecting from windows on this floor. 2. The increase in floor area and changes in the footprint of each building has resulted in differences in the landscaping near the north and south sides of each building from the original proposal. The original proposal reviewed by the Committee on April 6, 2010, had landscape planters adjacent to the parking areas that were between 5 feet and 7 feet wide (Exhibit D), while the latest revision has landscape planters adjacent to the parking areas that are between 1 and 2 feet wide (Exhibit E). Trees are required to be planted at a rate a) one (1) tree per 30 linear feet of building Section 17.10.040(C) and one (1) tree per three (3) parking stalls per Section 17.12.030(A)(11). The Committee may want to discuss this revision with the applicant. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Landscaping shall be intensified along the street frontages to minimize visibility of the parking lot. Options for discussion include low planter walls with shrubs; undulating berms along the street frontages within the landscape setback and landscape areas that are at least 3 feet in height (at the maximum height); dense plantings; or a combination of these. 2. The new block wall at the common property line between the project site and 9649 Calle Vejar and • 8378/8398 Archibald Avenue shall be constructed of concrete masonry units with a decorative • A-27 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2009-00493—GB ARCHITECTS • August 3, 2010 Page 3 finish such as stucco. The east face of the existing walls, along the common property lines between the project site and 9648 Calle Vejar and 9648/9649 Friant Street, shall be refinished to match the new walls. 3. Revise the bus shelter to incorporate rear and side walls that are 5 feet in height and a roof for weather protection. The support columns of the shelter shall be a minimum of 2 feet by 2 feet in section. Also, the bus shelter shall have a roof (it is not clear if one is already provided). 4. The new trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. 5. The Southern California Edison transformer box shall be located at the northeast corner of the site. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices, etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced at a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. 2. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be placed 5 feet from the right-of-way and shall be screened on the north, south, and east sides behind a 4-foot high • block wall. This wall shall have a stackstone veneer to match the tower elements of the buildings. • 3. • All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a similarly dark color. 4. Decorative paving shall be provided at all vehicular access points onto the site. 5. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 6. All downspouts on all elevations of the building shall be routed through the interior of the building. The downspout on the bus shelter shall be routed through the one of the support columns of the shelter. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved with the above-noted revisions to be verified by Staff and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: • The Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the project, subject to all of the policy issues, and the following conditions of approval: 1. The use of glass on the west elevation on the second floor shall be minimized to ensure that during the late afternoon hours glare from the setting sun does not reflect back towards the residences located immediately west of the project site. The Committee approved the applicant's proposal to accomplish this by: a) blocking in the two windows near the center of the building and b) reducing the vertical height of all the windows on the west elevation by utilizing metal inserts with a matte finish. The metal inserts shall reduce the height of the windows from the soffit down by 2 to 3 feet, • A-28 • DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS • August 3, 2010 Page 4 subject to staff review during plan check. The applicant shall work with staff during plan check to ensure that vertical dimension and the type of glass selected minimizes glare. 2. The landscape planters on the north and sides of each building, adjacent to the parking areas, are acceptable as proposed. 3. The landscaping shall be intensified along the street frontages to minimize visibility of the parking lot through the use of berms and swales. The applicant shall work with staff during plan check to meet this requirement. • 4. The new block wall at the common property lines along the north and west boundaries shall have a decorative finish with stucco along the project site. Where block walls exist along the common property lines, they shall be refinished to match the new block walls. 5. The bus shelter shall have rear and side walls that are 5 feet in height and a roof for weather protection. The support columns of the shelter shall be a minimum of 2 feet by 2 feet in section. 6. The new trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. 7. The Southern California Edison transformer box shall be located at the northeast corner of the site. • Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger, Troyer Staff Planner Mike Smith • • • A-29 RESOLUTION NO. 10-41 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00493 TO CONSTRUCT TWO OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS OF APPROXIMATELY 27,000 SQUARE FEET ON THREE VACANT PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF 2.5 ACRES IN THE OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL(OP) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF; APN'S: 0208-811-58, -59, AND -60. A. Recitals. 1. George Botros of GB Architects, on behalf of Jamil Samouth, filed an application for the issuance of Development Review DRC2009-00493, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of October 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on October 13, 2010, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to three (3) parcels located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route with a combined area of approximately 108,900 square feet (2.5 acres) that is approximately 180 feet(east to west) by approximately 611 feet(north to south); and b. The site is undeveloped and until recently, was used for agricultural purposes as a . strawberry field; and c. To the north and west of the site are single-family residences. To the south, across Arrow Route, is an office complex of four(4) buildings. To the east, across Archibald Avenue, are administrative offices for the San Bernardino County Board of Education and an inactive gas station; and • d. The zoning of the property and the property to the north is Office Professional(OP) District; the properties to the east and west are zoned Low-Medium (LM) and Low (L) Residential A-30 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-41 DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS October 13, 2010 Page 2 • District, respectively. The zoning of the properties to the south is General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3); and e. The applicant proposes to construct two, two-story office/professional buildings with a combined floor area of approximately 27,000 square feet; and f. A review and request for approval of land uses are not included in this application. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is for the construction of two (2) office buildings. The project site is designated as Office and the anticipated land uses will be principally offices. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposal is for the construction of two (2)office buildings. The proposal does not include any land use or activity that will introduce significant airborne emissions, significant noise impacts, or waste materials as part of its operations, introduce heavy truck traffic, or alter existing circulation patterns. The proposal does not contemplate any review and action for land • use entitlements. c. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposal is for the construction of two(2)office buildings. The project site is zoned Office Professional and the anticipated land uses will be principally offices. The project will comply with the design goals and policies described in the Development Code and the Technical standards applicable to the zoning district including required parking, setbacks, and landscaping. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Infill Development Projects -as the project site is consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations, applicable General Plan policies, and zoning regulations; the project site has an overall area of less than 2.5 acres; the project site has no value as habitat for environmentally sensitive species; would have no significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site will be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. • A-31 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-41 DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS October 13, 2010 • Page 3 • Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction two, two-story office buildings of approximately 27,000 square feet on three vacant parcels with a combined area of 2.5 acres in the Office/Professional (OP) District, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route - 0208-811-58, -59, and -60. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) Proposed land uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit as identified in Table 17.10.030 of the Development Code, shall'require a separate review and approval by the Planning Director or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check, issuance of a business license, and building occupancy. 4) Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City Standard for commercial projects. 5) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of • the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 6) The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. The maximum height of light standards, including the base, measured from the finished surface is 15 feet. All light sources within 20 feet of the west property line shall have automatic timing devices that will turn off the lights no later than two hours after closing. • 7) The existing walls along the common property lines that the project site shares with the properties located at 9648 Calle Vejar, and 9648/9649 Friant Street shall be refinished with stucco. These walls shall have a stucco finish. 8) The applicant shall construct a 6-foot high block wall along the common property lines that the project site shares with the properties at 8378/8398 Archibald Avenue (except where the future drive aisle will be located). Within 45 feet of the curb at Archibald Avenue the maximum height of the wall shall be 3 feet. This wall shall have a stucco finish on both sides. Across the future drive aisle, a temporary • wrought iron fence not to exceed 6 feet in height shall be installed. 9) The Landscape Plan shall comply with Ordinance No. 823 adopted by • the City Council on December 2, 2010. All landscaping shall be installed prior to final acceptance of the buildings and/or project site complete and release for occupancy. A 32 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-41 DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS October 13, 2010 Page 4 • 10) All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. 11) All Double Detector Checks (DDC)and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be placed 5 feet from the right-of-way and shall be screened on the north, south, and east sides behind a 4-foot high block wall. This wall shall have a stackstone veneer to match the tower elements of the buildings. 12) All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a • similarly dark color. 13) Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the 45-foot setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. 14) An easement shall be provided to the owner(s)of the adjoining parcels to the north(APN's: 0208-801-36, -37, and -38)to allow joint access to Archibald Avenue via the proposed driveway and drive aisle at the northeast corner of the project site. Documents for this easement shall • be submitted for review by the City and the easement recorded with the County of San Bernardino (and other agencies/entities as may be required) prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. 15) The applicant shall submit, to the Engineering Department for review and approval, an application for a 'lot merger' to combine the three (3) separate parcels that comprise the subject property into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 16) The applicant shall submit a final draft (incorporating any applicable technical corrections to the text, format, etc.)of the draft Uniform Sign Program (related file: DRC2010-00092)for the City's records prior to issuance of building permits. All signs shall require review and approval of a separate Sign Permit application by the Planning Director prior to installation. Engineering Department 1) Archibald Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" Standards, as required and including: a) Remove existing drive approaches and provide curb and gutter per City Standards, as required. b) Provide three (3) 16,000 Lumen HPSV street lights. • c) Install street trees per the Standard Conditions. A-33 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-41 DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS • October 13, 2010 • Page 5 d) The drive approach shall be 35 feet wide at the right-of-way line, 14 feet back of curb, with radii per attached Standard Drawing 101, Type C. If the approach is pushed further on site to flatten the ramp grade, the 35-foot width shall extend to the back of sidewalk (which crosses the approach at the 0" curb face). The transition to a 32-foot drive aisle width shall begin at the back of sidewalk. e) Verify existing access ramps for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Standard 102. Otherwise reconstruct access ramps to current City Standard 100-B and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc., or approved equal. f) Proposed Archibald Avenue driveway to align with existing school driveway on the east side of Archibald Avenue. g) Protect existing traffic signal equipment on Archibald Avenue, or replace as required. h) Protect existing traffic signing and striping, R26(s)"No Stopping" signs or replace as required. • 2) Arrow Route frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" Standards as required and including: • a) Provide curb and gutter, a.c. pavement, sidewalk and one (1) 16,000 Lumen HPSV Street light. b) Provide a combination of bus bay and right turn lane on Arrow Route, per City Standard 119. c) Drive approach per a Special Design consistent with City Standards 101 Type C and 119, shall be a minimum of 35 feet wide at the back of sidewalk. d) Right turn lane does not leave room for street trees per the Standard Conditions. We suggest incorporating desired species into on-site landscaping. e) Protect existing traffic signal equipment on Arrow Route, or replace as required. f) Protect existing traffic signing and striping and R26(s) "No Stopping" signs, or replace as required. • g) Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along the right turn lane, to provide a minimum of 8.5 feet measured from the face of curb. • A-34 , PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-41 . DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS October 13, 2010 Page 6 • 3) Driveway accent pavings on both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route shall be located outside the public right-of-way. 4) Intersection curb returns on Major Arterial streets have a 35-foot radius. The 60-foot transition into the Bus Bay/Right Turn Lane, per Standard Drawing 119, shall begin after the curb return and any catch basins and curbside drain outlets, leaving no more than 50 feet from the transition to the near edge of the Arrow Route driveway. a) Access ramps shall be per Standard Drawing 102, sidewalk joins per Standard Drawing 103 and curvilinear sidewalk per Standard Drawing 114. 5) Provide reciprocal access easement in favor of the commercial property to the north. 6) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical)on the opposite side of Archibald Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of project frontage on • Archibald Avenue to the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. 7) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except 66 KV) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site east of Archibald Avenue to the first pole off-site the westerly project boundary, prior to public • improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may• request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 8) The development requires installation of fiber optics conduits, vaults, and manholes on Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route per City Standard Plans 135-137. Also, the improvement plans need to show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults, and manholes with construction notes using City Standard Plans 135-137. • 9) Construction within the "special flood hazard area" (Zone A) shall conform to the construction standards outlined in Chapter 19.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, providing for Floodplain • Management Regulations. It is mentioned in Chapter 19.12 that the building can be watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water, to be certified by a professional Engineer. A-35 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-41 • DRC2009-00493 — GB ARCHITECTS October 13, 2010 • Page 7 10) The City would prefer to have a couple of curbside drain outlets to Archibald Avenue, instead of any storm drain connection at the back of existing catch basin on Arrow Route. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2010. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and .adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the • Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 2010, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • A-36 distos... ite4 , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Atito Is STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2009-00493 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: GEORGE BOTROS, GB ARCHITECTS FOR JAMIL SAMOUTH • LOCATION: NWC ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE; APN'S: 0208-811-58, -59, AND -60 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / /_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 10-41, Standard / /_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The / / project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X B. Time Limits 1. Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved / /_ • use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. SC-12-08 1 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00493StdCond 10-13.doc . A-37 • Project No.DRC2009-00493 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / / • site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, and the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / /_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and /_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety • Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for. _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all /_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved / /_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so • as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_I_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, I / including proper illumination. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / /_ owner, homeowners'association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. D. Shopping Centers 1. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the / / Planning Director: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of(the shopping center/the project). / /_ b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to / /_ include self-closing pedestrian doors. 2 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00493StdCond 10-13.doc • A-38 Project No.DRC2009-00493 Completion Date c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. / / • d. Roll-up doors. _/_/_ e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. _/_/_ f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. / /_ g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed / /_ to be hidden from view. 2. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. / / 3. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and _/_/_ debris remain for more than 24 hours. 4. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for"employee parking only." _/ /_ 5. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an / /_ exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading-No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening,closing,or / /_ other handling of boxes, crates; containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / /_ projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main /_/_ building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts / /_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / /_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). • 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00493StdCond 10-13.doc A-39 Project No.DRC2009-00493 Completion Date 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/ • parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 5. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more / /_ parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. G. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily / /_ residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 2. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for / /_ commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. 3. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other _/_/_ non-residential development. 4. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided. Bus _/_/_• shelters shall also include a bench, a trash receptacle, and an adjoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity)on a concrete pad. Bus shelter shall be located outside public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained. H. Landscaping • 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within / /_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees -24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking / /_ stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one / /_ tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering / / sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. 6. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the / /_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 4 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00493StdCond 10-13.doc A-40 Project No.DRC2009-00493 Completion Date I. Other Agencies • 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location /_/_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) J. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: / /_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; • e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air • conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2009-00493) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. / /_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to / /_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/_/_ 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the / /_ Building and Safety Department. K. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / /_ marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2009-00493). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or /_/_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program • 5 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00493StdCond 10-13.doc A-41 . Project No.DRC2009-00493 Completion Date deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/ • recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday / /_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter). L. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances I /_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. / /_ 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas. / /_ • 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. / /_ 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. _/_/_ 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. / /_ M. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial • conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / /_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, / /_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT/GRADING —/ /- DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 6 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00493StdCond 10-13.doc . A-42 Project No.DRC2009-00493 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2740, ijOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / /_ • 2. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the / / City: 3. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 I / feet measured from the face of curbs. O. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source / /_ of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except:that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / / • Street Name Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Archibald Avenue X X (c) X X X (e) Arrow Route X X X X X X • Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights,and intersection safety lights / /_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to • final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / /_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. • 7 - I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00493StdCond 10-13.doc A-43 Project No.DRC2009-00493 Completion Date c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and / I interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / / project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets,a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/ 1_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with I / adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / /_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan / / check. --- 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / /_ accordance with the City's street tree program. • • • • • 8 • .. l:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res &.Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00493StdCond 10-13.doc A-44 Project No.DRC2009-00493 Completion Date 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed _/_/_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street • improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Archibald Avenue Gingko biloba Maidenhair tree 5' 25' O.C. 15 GAL "Faitmount" Archibald Avenue - Platanus acerifolia London Plane tree 8' 30' O.C. 15 GAL Foreground tree P.A. 8' or greater P.A. less than 8' Pyrus betulaefolia Dancer Flowering Pear 3' 20' O.C. 151 GAL "Paradise" Background tree— Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3' 25' O.C. 15 GAL with Platanus "St: Marry" -with Pyrus Accent Platanus acerifolia London Plane tree 8' 30' O.C. 15 GAL tree Lagerstroemia hybrid Pink-Red Crape Myrtle 3' 20' O.C. 24" Box "Tuscarora" Hybrid Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil • amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / /_ adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be.plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. P. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / /_ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective /_/ Beautification Master Archibald Avenue Plan. Q. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project(or portions thereof)is located within a Flood Hazard Zone;therefore,flood protection / /_ measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. • • 9 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010-Res &-Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00493StdCond 10-13:doc A-45 Project No.DRC2009-00493 • Completion Date 2. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance / /_ of building permits.. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 3. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/ • property from adjacent areas. R. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas, /_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / /_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. I /_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. S. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one _/_/_ parcel prior to issuance of building permits. • 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / / new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall / /_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department • within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Security Lighting . 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. /_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,with /_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 10 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00493StdCond 10-13.doc A-46 Project No.DRC2009-00493 Completion Date 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / / •. Security Hardware 1. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, / /_ or alarmed. V. Windows 1. Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. / /_ • 2. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede / I_ entry to burglars. W. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ visibility. X. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and _/ /_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. • 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number: (909)941-1488. /_/_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION - �LANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • 11 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res &-Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00493StdCond-10-13.doc -- • - - • -< A47 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2009-00493 Building & Safety Department C 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 • . T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 GRADING COMMITTEE • PROJECT REPORT&RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: DRC2009-00493 Type: Commercial . Location: Northwest Corner of Archibald Avenue & Arrow Route Planning Department: MICHAEL SMITH APN: Meeting Date: August 3, 2010 By: Matthew Addington Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: ) }{ No: If NO, see COMMENTS below: PRELIMINARY: GRC: August 3, 2010 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: PC Meeting: 10/, 3/ e?1 D By: N1. Note: • Building and Safety - Grading will review and comment on future submittals for this project. • • In the previous review, a comment was written by the Building and Safety Department- "This project may move forward to the technical committees. Prior • to submitting the revised plans for technical review, the applicant must address ALL outstanding items noted below". Many items were not addressed. Please see Sections B and D below. • Many items in the previous Grading Committee Comments were not addressed. A meeting was held with the Project Owner Jamil Samouth and the Building and Safety Services Director. It was agreed to by the Project Owner that the project will be conditioned to meet the items which were not addressed. A. STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning . Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2009-30493 Samouth\DRC2009-00493 Grading Committee Project Report#2,20100803.doc .,, . . ...... 1of7 . • A-48 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2009-00493 art. Building & Safety Department �'" 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 f. 0 7: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and • approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) & shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient • I:IBUILDINGWERMITSIDRC2009-00493 SamouthlDRC2009-00493 Grading Committee Project Report#2,20100803.doc 2-of-7 A-49 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2009-00493 ` ( Building &Safety Department I V 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 S T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • detail including gradients, elevations and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. • 14. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 15. Private sewer, water and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 16.The maximum parking stall gradient is 5%. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the current adopted California Building Code. 17. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 18. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100- feet beyond project boundary. • 19. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 20. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". • 21. Grading Inspections: a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project . owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre- grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1) The bottom of the over-excavation • 1:1BUILDING'ERMITSIDRC2009-00493 Samouth■DRC2009-00493 Grading Committee Project Report#2,20100803.doc 3of7 - A-50 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2009-00493 laN a Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 3 se T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 2) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; 3) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; 4) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. B. COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected /completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. • Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: 1. Continue to shade all pavements and slopes on the conceptual grading and drainage plan. 2. Provide the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) on the title sheet of the conceptual grading and drainage plan. 3. Continue to show typical cross sections at all boundaries on the conceptual grading and drainage plan. 4. A WQMP BMP exhibit must be provided in this conceptual grading and drainage plan set showing a volume based BMP. 5. There is a conflict between the conceptual grading and drainage plan and the landscaping plan. The conceptual grading and drainage plan calls for a berm and swales along the street frontages. The landscaping plan does not reflect the berm and swales. In addition, the proposed landscaping layout appears to prevent the layout of the swales which are required to meet the storm water quality requirements. Also at the corner • I:IBUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2009-00493 Samouth\DRC2009-00493 Grading Committee Project Reportit2,20100603.doc 4of7 A-51 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2009-00493 4Building &Safety Department t10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 • T. (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 landscaping feature a drainage inlet is proposed which may cause a conflict. Please coordinate the landscaping and the civil drawings prior to the next submittal. 6. The Building Inspection Supervisor has commented on the accessibility path crossing a diagonal through the southerly drive isle. Please provide a pedestrian / accessibility crossing which is perpendicular to the path of the drive isle. Please note that at this conceptual level a detailed review of the accessibility access is not performed. It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. 1. The final grading and drainage plans submitted for permits shall include a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Best Management Practices (BMP) exhibit and a reference copy of the landscaping site plan. 2. An HCOC exists for the downstream receiving water. The downstream receiving water (Mill Creek, Prado Area) is experiencing significant degradation of its banks. The project • shall implement a ground surface volume-based treatment control BMP device (retention/detention facility). The Storm Water Quality Management Plan and the grading and drainage plan shall contain an appropriate volume based BMP prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 4. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide the to Building and Safety Services Official a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 5. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the final / precise grading and drainage plans shall include a reference copy of the landscaping plans within the grading plan submittal package and the grading plan and landscaping plan shall be coordinated for drainage . and other water quality issues. I:\SUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2009-00493 Samouth\DRC2009-00493 Grading Committee Project Report/t2,20100803.doc 5of7 A-52 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2009.00493 ,, Building &Safety Department 10500 Civic Center , • �jl Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 tt� 1: (909)477-2710 F:(909)477.2711 D. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality , Management Plan"shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 2. The conceptual grading and drainage plan must show the proposed volume based storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices required in the WQMP prepared by Everest Environmental. 3. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Everest Environmental, dated December 28, 2009, is deemed substantially complete. The following comments are required to be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit Page Section Item Cover The engineer of record must wet sign and seal the document The document must contain a BMP exhibit showing the locations of all BMP's and shall include details of the BMP's. 2 Please include the appropriate SIC codes. Codes can include those from Groups 59, 63 to 67, 73, and 86 to 87. 6 1.2 Please add bullet points for information to be handwritten in for the • WDID and PMT numbers when the numbers are available. 7 1.3 Please include the land use type as required in the model template. 8 2.1 Please follow the City of Rancho Cucamonga guidance pages available at the Building and Safety front counter to complete this section. 9 2.1 In the"Pollutant of Concern Summary Table" the pollutant type is either"Expected" or "Potential". A"No" response is inappropriate. This document is missing Table 2-1. The "Pollutant of Concern Summary Table" must match Table 2-1. In addition, Heavy Metals, Organic Compounds are expected. Include suspended solids for Mill Creek. Also please list the name of the receiving waters per the model template. 10 2.2 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern table; item 1A must be marked as 'No". A volume based BMP is required as Mill Creek downstream from this project is experiencing a hydrologic condition of concern, bank degradation. 14 3.1 The responses in the "Site Design BMP's" seem to be general in nature and not specific to this project. Please revise your responses. In addition, please provide a specific response(s) for the required volume based BMP. 18 3.2 Shared driveway access is listed as a BMP. Please show this shared driveway access with an adjacent property(s) on the conceptual grading and drainage plan. 24 3.3 Please finish Table 3-3 and indicating which BMP('s) are proposed. Organic Compounds, Trash and Debris, Oils and Grease, and Metals 1:1BUILDINGIPERMITSIDRC2009-00493 Samouth\DRC2009-00493 Grading Committee Project Report#2,20100B03.doc 6of7 A-53 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2009-00493 Building & Safety Department er Dr. • Rancho 10500 Civic CucamongaCent , CA 91730 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 Page Section item are expected Pollutants of Concern. The project BMP's must address all the expected and potential pollutants of concern. A"No" response is not appropriate. This table must match Table 2-1. 25 3.4 A volume based BMP is required. The use of flow based BMP's for this project is not acceptable. 26 4.3 Please include the entity responsible for the BMP Operation and Maintenance prior to the transfer to the Home Owners Association (HOA). 35 6 Please replace the Certification with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan". A copy of the agreement may be picked up at the Building and Safety front counter. A-1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not use Attachment A-1. Please remove this attachment. 37 A-2 The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not use Attachment A-2. Please remove this attachment. Please provide a WQMP BMP exhibit within the document and include a copy in the conceptual grading and drainage plan. • • • I:\DUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2009-00493 Samouth\DRC2009-00493 Grading Committee Project Report#2,20100803.doc 7of7 A-54 . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District A;� Mo imti Fire Construction Services . ‘•FIRE / STANDARD CONDITIONS December 15, 2009 Jamil Samouh 8430 Archibald PMT2009-00493 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonqa.ca.us/fire/index.htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-. • sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. . c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 3. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 4. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. iiOn all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. . A.55 FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system., plans. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: 1. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2. Group "A" Occupancies. 3. "E" Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons. 4. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). 5. When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. 6. When the building access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fire Lane Standard #9-7 7. When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System • 1. The California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code require a listed fire sprinkler monitoring Central Station Fire Alarm system. Plan check approval and a . building permit are required prior to the installation of the fire alarm system. Plans and specifications shall • be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drives aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9- 7. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 151 story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. • b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. A-56 2 • 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire • Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail- safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 6. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75'. • above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code, permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants • Refrigeration Systems A-57 3 • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire Construction Services • Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District. #85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: • 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site.• Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER • The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". A-58 4 PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: . 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering • Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special.hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. • The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '/z' x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • A-59 5 STAFF REPORT b • PLANNING DEPARTMENT RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: October 13, 2010 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC - A proposal to develop an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 12 buildings and 13 parcels on a triangular shaped property of . approximately 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) in the General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street - APN: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, and 0209-161-24. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC - A proposal to subdivide a property comprised of three • (3) parcels with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) into thirteen (13) parcels in conjunction with the development of an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 12 buildings in the General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street - APN: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, and 0209-161-24. Related files: Development Review DRC2007-00551, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Site - Vacant — General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3) and Low-Medium (LM) Residential District North - Rancho Cucamonga City Yard and Industrial Buildings — General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 2) South - Single-Family Residences — City of Ontario East - (Part) Industrial Buildings — General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3) (Part) Condominiums — Low-Medium (LM) Residential District West - Single-Family Residences — City of Ontario B. General Plan Designations: • Site - General Industrial and Low-Medium Residential North - General Industrial South - Residential (City of Ontario) East - General Industrial and Low-Medium Residential West - Residential (City of Ontario) Items B & C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00551 AND SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • Page 2 C. Site Characteristics: The project site is comprised of three (3) parcels, with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) (Exhibit B). The project site is triangular-shaped and is approximately 1,100 feet (east to west) at its widest point along 8`" Street and 260 feet (east to west) along 7th Street. It is approximately 1,650 feet measured north to south. The majority of the project site is located between 7th and 8th Streets. The remainder, approximately 38,952 square feet (0.89 acre) in area, is located on the south side of 7th Street. The site is vacant; vegetation is limited to low grasses and a small grouping of trees. The property is bound on the south and west by the Cucamonga flood control channel and beyond that are single-family residences.in the City of Ontario. To the east are industrial office/warehouse buildings and an operations facility for Verizon. To the north is property owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is the site for a proposed public works administration building and a household hazardous waste facility (Related file: Development Review DRC2009-00882). To the southeast are additional residences. The zoning of the part of the property located between 7th and 8th Street is General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), while the zoning of the part of the property south of 7th Street is Low- Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north and east are General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 2) and General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), respectively. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. D. Parking Calculations: The parking calculations for the proposed buildings is per • Section 17.12.040(C)(1)(a) and (d) of the Development Code. Floor Area Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Type of Use (SF) Parking Ratio Required Provided Building Al (Parcel 1) Warehouse 45,927 varies* 31 Office 8,500 1/250 34 Total 54,427 65 73 Building A2 (Parcel 2) Warehouse 71,777 varies* 38 Office 5,500 1/250 22 Total 77,277 60 60 Building B (Parcel 4) Warehouse 92,359 varies* 43 Office 9,000 1/250 36 Total 101,359 79 79 Building C • (Parcel 3) Warehouse 39,217 varies* 30 Office 2,000 1/250 8 Total 41,217 38 38 B & C —2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00551 AND SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 3 Building D (Parcel 5) Warehouse 20,448 varies* 20 Office 2,000 1/250 8 Total 22,448 28 29 Building E (Parcel 7) Warehouse 20,991 varies* 20 Office 3,500 1/250 14 Total 24,491 34 36 Building F (Parcel 6) Warehouse 14,468 varies* 14 Office 2,000 1/250 8 Total 16,468 22 24 Building G (Parcel 8) • Warehouse 15,787 2,500 varies* 16 Office 1/250 10 Total 18,287 26 27 Building H (Parcel 9) Warehouse 9,714 varies* 10 Office 3,500 1/250 14 Total 13,214 24 24 Building J (Parcel 10) Warehouse 6,985 varies* 7 Office 2,500 1/250 10 Total 9,485 17 17 Building K (Parcel 11) Warehouse 3,520 varies" 4 Office 2,500 1/250 10 Total 6,020 14 14 • B & C - 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00551 AND SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 4 Building L (Parcel 12) Warehouse 2,428 varies* 2 Office 2,500 1/250 10 Total 4,928 12 13 • Total Required 419 Total Provided 434 * Note: For warehouse uses, the parking calculations are 1 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet; 1 space per 2,000 square feet for the second 20,000 square feet; and 1 space per 4,000 for additional floor area in excess of the first 40,000 square feet. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to construct an industrial office/warehouse complex comprised of twelve (12) office/warehouse buildings ranging in floor area between 99,359 square feet (Building B) to 4,928 square feet (Building L) (Exhibit D). The proposal includes the subdivision of the project site into thirteen (13) parcels (Exhibit E). The location of the twelve (12) proposed buildings will correspond with twelve of the proposed parcels located between 7th and 8th Streets. No tenants have been specified at this time; the buildings are speculative. The applicant does not propose any development on Parcel 13, • located at the south side of 7th Street. As this parcel is in the Low-Medium (LM) Residential District, development of this parcel is limited to the uses permitted in the residential districts as described in Table 17.08.030 of the Development Code — industrial uses will not be permitted on this parcel. The combined floor area of all the buildings will be approximately 389,600 square feet, including the mezzanines. Two driveways, one at 7th Street and another at 8th Street, will be the primary access to all of the buildings (except Building Al) and the associated parking, storage, and loading areas for each building. A north to south drive aisle will pass through the site and link the driveways at 7th and 8th Streets. This drive aisle is 38 feet wide and exceeds the minimum width required by both the Planning and Fire Departments, which requires 24 feet and 26 feet, respectively. Access to Building A2 will be via a third driveway at 8th Street near the northwest corner of that building. As noted above, the applicant is required to provide 419 parking stalls; 434 parking stalls have been provided. Per Section 17.12.030(D) — Loading Facilities, the applicant is required to provide one truck trailer stall for storage/parking. This project requires forty-one (41) stalls for this purpose. However, the applicant cannot provide this amount because of site layout constraints and has submitted a Minor Exception request (Related file: DRC2008-00152) so that the required number of stalls can be reduced by 25 percent (the equivalent of 11 stalls in this case) to thirty-one (31) stalls. The project is generally characterized by buildings with floor areas that vary significantly in size due to the shape of the project site (Exhibits D and G). The largest buildings will be at the north side of the site and the smaller buildings will be at the south side of the site. The • office areas of each building will range between 2,500 to 8,500 square feet (including the • mezzanines). The larger buildings will be dominated by warehouse space. Numerous dock doors will be a major feature of these buildings with large areas of the immediate property in the vicinity of each building dominated by pavement for truck maneuvering, parking, and loading facilities. The smaller buildings will have floor areas more evenly divided between B & C —4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2007-00551 AND SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 Page 5 office and small-scale warehousing/storage areas. With the exception of Building Al, all of the buildings will have their corresponding office areas located near the north-south drive aisle. The office area of Building Al will be at the northwest corner of that specific building. Parking for employees and visitors will be arranged along the north-south drive aisle and near the office areas. The minimum landscape coverage that is required in this development district is 12 percent; the amount of landscaping provided is approximately 12.9 percent. B. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into thirteen (13) parcels ranging in area between 3.92 acres (Parcel 4) to 0.50 acre (Parcels 11 and 12) (Exhibit E). Each parcel will comply with the required minimum parcel size of 0.50 acre for projects in this development district. With the exception of Parcel 13, all parcels are contiguous and will be fully developed with buildings and associated improvements. As stated previously, Parcel 13 is located on the south side of 7th Street and will not be developed. Each of the proposed buildings will be situated on its own parcel. Although each parcel will have a sufficient number of parking stalls to satisfy the uses within its associated building, a requirement for easements for the purpose of shared access, use, and maintenance of the parking lot areas, driveways, and drive aisles have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. C. Floor/Area Analysis: Per Chapter 2, Figure LU-2, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) in the General Industrial land use category is 60 percent. The net area of the project site is • 806,643 square feet. Following the completion of the project, the combined building floor area will be approximately 389,600 square feet. Therefore, the floor area ratio for this site will be 48 percent. • D. Land Use Compatibility: The project will be consistent with the site's development district and the surrounding development districts to the north and east. The most sensitive land uses adjoining the project site are the single-family residences to the west in the City of Ontario and the residences to the southeast (immediately east of Parcel 13). Staff does not expect • substantial impacts on those land uses. The most significant activities that are anticipated are warehouse-related, with the exception of truck loading/unloading, such activities are conducted indoors. Manufacturing, or similarly intense uses, if proposed, would be required to be conducted indoors, as well. Staff notes that such intensive uses would be limited as there is not enough parking available to permit land uses dominated by manufacturing. Because of the location of the buildings on the site and overall site layout, the buildings themselves will partly buffer the residential properties located to the southeast from on-site activities and, to a lesser extent, the properties to the south and west. Impacts to the residential properties to the south and west will be further mitigated by the presence of the Cucamonga Channel (approximately 150 feet wide including the parallel access roads) located between the residences and the project site. Impacts to the residential properties to the east of Parcel 13 will be minimal as no development is proposed on that parcel. Furthermore, Buildings K and L will have a setback from the curb at 7th Street of 45 feet (as opposed to 25 feet) per Section 17.30.080(D). Potential land uses that have more significant impacts will require a Conditional Use Permit and a public hearing. At the time such uses are proposed, staff will conduct a thorough analysis to establish additional mitigations, if necessary, to ensure compatibility with • the surrounding area. E. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The project was reviewed by the Grading and Technical Review Committees twice. The first review occurred on February 16, 2010, and at that time, the Committee did not accept the project because of several revisions/corrections B & C - 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00551 AND SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 • Page 6 that needed to be completed. The applicant revised the submittal and returned for a second review to on June 15, 2010. Following their review of the revisions/corrections, the Committees accepted the application and recommended approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. F. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Granger) two times. The initial review occurred on February 16, 2010, (Exhibit G) and at that time, they deemed the application unacceptable for forwarding to the Planning Commission for review and action. The Committee concluded that the architecture of the proposed buildings was not satisfactory and inconsistent with the City's design standards. The principal revisions requested included the incorporation of more glass and textured concrete and to increase the horizontal and vertical articulation of the wall planes at various locations to reduce the expanse of flat wall planes. Revisions to the site design were also requested, including altering the parking arrangement for some of the buildings so that the parking areas for employees/visitors were separated as much as possible from the truck loading/unloading areas (Exhibit J). The revised plans were submitted for review by the Committee a second time on June 15, 2010. The Committee reviewed the application and deemed it acceptable for forwarding to the Planning Commission for review and action. The Committee concluded that the applicant had satisfactorily revised the architecture and various components of the site layout in response to the Committee's comments to the Design Review Committee meeting on • February 16, 2010. The Committee determined that the architecture of the office areas for each industrial building, a key point of discussion during the last meeting, was sufficiently revised and was now consistent with the level of architecture expected for industrial projects. Although a few additional revisions were requested, the Committee permitted the applicant to follow-up with staff to ensure the revisions were completed satisfactorily without a third review meeting:(or defer them as conditions of approval). In the interim period, the applicant completed the revisions as requested. Staff has incorporated into the Resolution of Approval special conditions for the completion of any remaining issues. The Committee recommends approval to the Planning Commission (Exhibit K). G. Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681: The applicant submitted a draft Uniform Sign Program for review by the City to ensure that any proposed signs would be compatible with the architecture of the buildings and in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance. This sign program was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Granger) and the Committee recommended approval to the Planning Director for final approval. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, and air quality, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A • Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. B & C- 6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00551 AND SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 7 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2010-00551 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, Jam R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Map Exhibit C - Site Utilization Plan Exhibit D - Overall Site Plan and Detail Site Plans • Exhibit E - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 Exhibit F - Grading Plans and Sections Exhibit G - Floor Plans Exhibit H - Building Elevations Exhibit I - Landscape Plan and Detail Landscape Plan Exhibit J - Design Review Committee (02/16/2010) Action Comments Exhibit K - Design Review Committee (06/15/2010) Action Comments Exhibit L - Initial Studies I and II Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2007-00551 Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 • B & C- 7 z- 1 E[u s' s _- 1, <I 7IRA I-wi1 • a 8° Ix I '��rl� M P ( I P _ �1 Qlpx tee§, � LOMA l_ i wF lL°J.� i ILrom sG s� ��� N M s �` �, n I( _...>< 1 EMOit evt r y I rM�r JT�`-� MOXA 1 E• G�E • SI� Jn 5 PAXG T N g c 5'$ 1 :Li E. .E sly �L L l_ G 1_c cE Sr J-I`I J i,.,!IPwESSt .J SBA ' QaJ AIL I I �S ; SouEP�SCON- ci gl it so j I¢I ��--'� V V AFO T� -.:., Iuuiazwm ( $dear °°'•3TAPE As _� & M s• !98RYGPARK ; ':�IGHL9N0 AVP _ ,p M `no '" III! AH . : I ww GAPS xs y a; °^' u1NEDULn www°°yy1��I�S n 'aO M.' sv.LUn T1 1 �- € �'y1 I i MALE x FERM ��J �s IF a Gm !N� I :ix I aL D SDxEN'I I I ( F1�' n IEING;DfO Li 3 G $I flOrl Yi C N' IS l g BLp. I f° ,7 19TH ST_ caLa, AvE 7 Y wb Dx 111 C It�Nr.J- PI in � �'SJ� _ E OEEfl 1 "� eV c` 1 ._ P s- W 8 L's € 3,�y i•°"�-� `T lae .11 E EW CANYON wuarm P E. 35LAT At^ ��I� EA I r �F Pcu4Ytis gI T $ Y rcFnNMEV _ 1.3m P 4I M VICTORIA:. •T �iJ 6. 1-La T'' �I f Iano H _�-- jvu ,I NCItV SIB _w3PkI I I t-��lzxw 1 'ill� l �oUM IEwM s �� — ` . .[ b.. , " a 4::: MOx4'�sTAS IAIi/.t'Awa3ncT V; § d1PN VI$7B Si s ^•y"LApNTEgAS/n I��, q� I Y S� if k IL l$IIIIn£INONN A eI °M 1_u�x®( y, "1� 6 L31LR E���Ia II o_ g Pac s 1 ��CT A ; CICCTGeT L xE5 IJ� rw— FJ a C1I- 1 L511�2 Lst � m 119 �1 I£ AITA i i�Ll4xh'S� w xT0 e 3Gt!.wm LL+4. 4ESL '��LOMA_. 'A Q be I g •iip CAFNEWN III :] a '�c 1 cu 6� �rmm EP A— n IE --/ k' w `i I2ANCH0 CUCAMONGA 5, r'IOMIA LOOMA G � .. LAVOAD5 Aq m I °.!` I 1!!1: gw x ,r CRN117ALA I, `PS„Ti4 j it EMT I o31. s Ip�mes D '� R -. p. .i .qm.w.' 1 o Ps P=IiI osroO BASE: LINET RD.n . hIf INJ ` RD y BASE t nmrsdm F LIONuL�oaN, 5 Ur LIBRA > my g OYroN � f n Y tY v-"0* W�f guknAEut2t�•..La I 6 I�NI o � d�a ,E II m P �i ° �y�I _ / f�3 �% ;, UAllwec AED to 9� n i ss visa SIG a _ &6., ix I ..t 6I AxrnA LT HILL PRAM J� � _ I33RL4J,-J9 TO Si �'_ � PALO ALI f � p EPr .,`FgNffi I' l ��P , > 3v -- �LSA{ L_ a � else I w d JI 1 ..4A9Yx - i t„ €1 � l I LtPA'DS ---0111... t .FS-' k �P w n z p� A 9 IEU o @ fir^ i t '", y` 5 .M I I AC/cif MONGA c p . A, I l-- LY€lYJ� II'I , e 11 11I I� CHURCH e 3.< MU SEfl I £I higet :1 Frl - G �./I L l UPC L �1: z if ,� Li PASfREEL �kmx[E aA 8 Y li _ K �M..i 1 AVE PAR' WEST IIL \ 3 T$1.1 3ISlll�/ v twi6LJ-- LJ vY 'F:. � ¢ 4 LREENW—Le C orr(( PRPI( uAE� COYOTE •M PL �� ti PROJECT SITE .` iDt1TTi STA S I • AN P E o SP _ y R 1 `� e1' Pamar g g - TOWN CENTER a ;;.,f ?� .p 3POFT36l�L9� Sf / ,"y/ r ®CENTEfliv 'CSi u9 PROJECT „p�l I HISTOPIC II I i:.:vY! 1 3/" IR¢ .EOOIHILL B -� �88'�,I I Lli M�(AIIXfi1N COURT T.�@IS xaEC Ij1- I I I x," �! `/ HHOUSE . . I I ,/\�SALI PT11••rN n m II I ... e5 S i `'C IL I-l'� ili 3c '.CITY \ as a 16A -� c ctalsN HALLiPOUce`_ HERITAGE , IET p3is ,' S � $TAT HOSPITAL riFinat E NS ; L ' E _ k _.l . ux;. BEAR rxueq a z ;< - — E� '1i GULCH -g L 4 L ii l - n-s.� I R UR _I Gh I 6APL E ANLSi yf -mu d. RWacTI$f MAO X01 S Q ] g P RL °w„y`r7Gi g 1. E✓_AV JE /� x I I 2 GEILUx—g L__�NL 9LOE PI MUNN -# 0 r IMMxi s OxtAAO MESH Ex saNM ��Vh 'gvvx[ss LEnExo yysux sT" i.R �� i O '1 ? wMHLr Eors cr �Q�R '. sM GOxmNIC i&veEXr 4, w �y •_ , 8 fa • n wNIE n ' L., > aE Y w G gI 9iN TT 0 CUCAMONGA up Ev~-gL _�-� „„s1 I )Irr r,7 1 x9 : ¢� �I ERSEYBLV�—S •Lnnv uw Q. :. -' •I• 7 RANCH4 CORPO AT = sP R„,4 f CUCAMP,NGA g YARD ��0 v 5� U 1 s OLD L i 'P— Mefrolwk ■ _4. - Q!.`-'"m gl�� '. x_.xam 11 Station i METROLINK;AIN st u n s I '` ; 1 : I My n 8TH ST I ,.. 0 i x,. ; Mwlu l ; ly• ��I I r„,,„, 1 I nR;T — -- R _ t E FLUX1ixu°rPN�x A + Hw I>_j Lcxxm a _ I .a _ .O I '60LF,, 6TH ST { J �I�I1�1�I �wwa. II ISM '' � " i' .T 6T I' t',COURSE la �'j' lwmmwrrx£ II n pI aN� I1LJ fl � n_Nrlx ims� it rI �Ft - EXHIBIT A j ,„ `" �� xL� L��Jl3 11 a � L� I IoI ny/ I / """AIILL1 M.MJ// f 'f I Development Review DRuC2T0pR4 4 °7-108075951 0 Tentative Parcel Map S B -wil ',7 8, rizr' Tz.-„..... il ‘:•.;.:-ji. se ..,,,t I.ra-,,,i,. 1/4.i;1/4,4 , • 4,- 1011/4,1 Riii7 ;I int?-I"- itrie;r4 r--77,-i,„„,,- . ,r, m ,‘..7, - -,..),-,1 ,Y. -4,M1r04` I- i C",- . . ,ay,i,ciar21('V•e-t 0..I., 6,3 1'.'.7,,L•1 'ztfliri,Acsii air•ii • ,;.-...:1,41:-r . ,, , ,...1.1:,..2,,„.,.. ,,:, ola &,.. - iiiir. r.c9-4,--, 1•:}r.t.t.,;-trin_.--It.t., --t-t .. i ;_rt,-„tootig-i,j:tf,- Le ..,•; L•olug 4. 8 . -.:1 1 fii.. ....I' .--;/., F-I ' - F-7n V. i 1:-',"%setrAtiiki .L.,2,41, -- 1223,..,,t , 4 .0 .. . ,,........4. 1 k5 ■,,,,:. :4.,":',11- 74.4.-..;;'Qs: i .qtar,,, ,?, -er', ..,y;:4-:!;F:s„,„,,174 7 , go,r5,4,-i,mg i irm=7_7.4.:, v.,„,t. ,......--- ..-, i pt,Lir f-i70,t, .a.. ' :,tir:. 410' 4,,I1/4:' iriercrt.;^a,ti.:::&07:1,71'. ,•-"Wf.7"4•I' .0.-4'4',Unc'----' -'1/4; rcarperti' ."- "r - :•••;.'"±"e: :1',.. .i-r,-;--4,..::: 0_it'rg.,-,,•,-:z.-Ircr,fix.•; [1.:ti. ,-....,larif_7,tpt , :,..6 ,,,. ; ei-i.,w,„ .,,?, :,..- -.,--., • et, VT,,...il•i. :3-,:;:p4;'-qii,' ..-:-/LiC •-&, „:S.‘,..„;tva.,E",,i i Idt-21.ii:;11,:.-,:zy,161/41/4':1/4,.;:it1/4s5.E.t.?;:rce, d.1/4 -,.., .' . 1/4 1 il tit r-,-- : . c1/41/4,•'',1, t;ifv;xa." 14"4_"?> S_--: c. ,I, `....ct tii\•tii).--il -t7---.",,,' I '1,„W:c'41:2:i t;r9::.ti,..._.T..•, rEcl , ,!-,,----7-•,, '7 9,1 - .., ••E`fc,' 1- .7.0, j.-)1,\-?..A.,,-et: p.,i,.1 i: '„Sr,r -z,.4: c*„:7:4,-7,-.tflt,_‘'‘.ft.,..F! -. ,-..*,.• it.s.- 'C'n-4* =.--.],..., v 11„ ; O.. fla, -4,.. .:.",/, ,.:.-..r,. :,. - 1 ;*.-,,...„ p....„•ui w.i ..L.114 ..ai..,,-.4,,„pitl&L•t.,...r..,.., 4., 1y;:f•5.;",,,4„e”. • 'ir ,kt.' L74,41C..5: --‘::tc't-4--3]..1. - ..` .•%/4' 75.„_-.: ::1''''7-'1'1-4/4.-(;x7"'"1 ,,, i.;fr.7,--?,,ti- rs,-::`.. rti:A/11.‹',#,Sr,ti„?-..'f,..f.._i .kiti-Z. ...) 'la'-.S. ' C.' •• :' ;4441&:'''''''1-''-‘-` I;V:i fr41! trle IAA'....?ri . '7'.'..:-1"-r(.-:- , .i. ,,,,PiL.'44&,,,.444iI •% .t..$4a? !" Wt. Lri 11 4 1,...;\''--it-L'.45,- :l'g VP-... ..1'' i ..1 fif4e•V,n t,Y7.i`..;.-,..•.4. ,24 lf..:. -4:--=:1-'a.L,Svaraj4., eti'rn'irit-thaY;41:17-Verfi;r:h Pr"' '-Ct'AiNt'-4"'%-i;V:I '‘ 'if:pe': ': '''':a".71'---..1• ';-:: s-:ii-;et?"ta4H;fr'1,5■1*Wkig..r24.:,:,e4C, ,.! r.t ‘\.,....,...re4,1 tpliftr 77,,e1-.,','+/-.;i4rX ' ..'.4'474rtit'■',.1:/17-='"-.V:.i.1?;,..,',..4,1,1 W,ISWitknVit'rE t'lei • --1‘1 Wi r t4:1"..;;;'''‘ ,71:3".2:'..-$41;it7;Sik ----- ----'1,41'47,frj:lz i'z1/41.4'•41/41:;1/4.:-1/4431,,..titb;ii ,■94..1/41t41,1/44kVASI,J.;t41 „ . N 1 y 2.'5..tp,1,-,s,44; -2:vii!::,,•:A% .,,p•1,t,-.Lki"1,7,c,J. 7-X,I1 iterzi.zi , r,,i,•-,:::;,, ••',: 10.**--,x1-44t,11,,ig,2,:lit.J2:5.frim.....,,z-ip:R•q , •„ ,•• . .t• ".±€,,, 'S.8.,r.r:,...,...f.t.in,:',,ti ...L.114.4 t,,..„....*,..ries ,..,k't;.V„.:2•'.';c• -. -, ;:!: :,'Ir I: ■■•SI'd:A.x1/4,:; .6e4.•;-.1.-1.4411.114,Zoakit 4 4. ' .‘.. SL•J lit..t.'t. -44 :,•,•h-v.:.:.,„ s. ,.741;;;;. .,:.q,.4 c:::-. 4 7."-7.-:, .al "Zig,rty.,14N.)zr,,,::.f..-,•7•?I."-:- -_-----1,..",t4b,;.13:7:1-4-tatiN04,.,;:cagi:::.L.14'-. in.•li :2^ . .-- - :5: -'2,-N.1/4.4".‘ . :•:-1;irl:L._,-- - _.:_rat 7...:;,:iNiti;:..LI?::, ?-7'.2: 454;011:t.tr*A4,!1%. 46".4.51-t7gr4PAYI'Mi_ ‘ -,:r;:?Lr:1:4.4.,;4‘ 14--".÷-??t'.1i'4';1•",1 1;.--:1.:7-- .44,!;Wti. Aryit. .1,;Ei :VI'lr'lj Ilt-tbta.: _„.„,..4t.S.",:',■?rat-Drti"..3.6 -:frit'i-tM???,;:t.7,-4... .4;;;;:f■'_E-4$.2.-tt'''te.'1.1;r ItT4144':akt '-';12:?a,k.1-‘1; -r.:.1....itmgrn-n-C- .24-.37.:1!-' 717 TI4gir.1.74,"2,7"-7,-Ttb,iitl' E`XV 21M.L.,,,,„44rR.4"..,149$.'a"..4; 4■Wc- a-C-7:1--1-1, ;'?2,,rr'rn. irlirrirerre-W-let.'";:'ifr.Ye::::''S....4.-4:',4CF,- 4te *47-4 '- :.— '.:...-ra,,,-- t.c„:431:17. 0 -7. ILI„ r•...... . .,,,,..., .. -: rtItThr....,....s.,..vf,!.-,..... -..1,... iii0 ; „I . .... rt,Y : ="u c—.t- ia,P5MAlt■i:al_l.-:& .. - T. li • 'V.; .. 41,1/41:4--I '',134'..:-,‘ '11 1. ' .. l,i ' w X.',...-•.: . ,,'"7-4,cm•7",r•-'1;. :`.":10- -,'. • . ! l''''i';'i:444nri.;17.; ';fr, ,.•.■, ;14: . .";:1/4(.41071X-:', -,,, < 'y1/4,77j.".1/4,1it:), ' ..,,Vc..i-r.',i;C!\ q''',Is`'...: '• iit,.!--± ,-, .- . . r,,t2i, :1,,Y,..,• --"4,:,"\i-cin.,--i•:-.0 41:2LI, ',1-:4„*„,;-: . 1.-"i - 2 a " ,L.' - . 1..S. .'tr,'2.,,a,. .6 2- •....1.'t.. -:... .Project Site - , 4,19:4,i.,1/4,:isT71/4 7: r'1/4 ,...., :,-1.=-.- ..,•• :1/4 e1/4,..c.1-...:,.k +7;,,r.4.,..,-.,:tA k,,,, i„,7_.k,t• 11: Ir.) •-gtr:r1,00.:::::- :..ki_,:-.;otatkresi le',a*-. ..,- - i.,••••'- - .. . itt‘t .. i.-'2',:;:;,?.:.4i&tiz',4gfi JD-4' ,11 -I:.t.');.-7 1 324A-riltP- -:-..-,:t2-- ' r'14-4 a7'''• .C-strt. . '11---':....-•• 's-."-tri.c:'•- ill — c., •-.._ It, .,„.4.--_:,...--ti."5. --:,:k..4 ' tilt-- t .-' ". •rv. • • .: 1:.r.ri.,a,„ill ,. .. Ilu'acki".:in FT!'""".1'''''. : '''t 1. •"" ;1; 4/ .721:-',31 7c-7;F:1.: '‘' '1 ',,,.% .L Ti. ivSyt,.i::*•-, , '. • r. l',:y . ■:'-..'.7::' ret'l:61: 4 'II r. LI .go,arg-,c.i..,41 -, 1.-•iids-tc.° witT1-" 4' ' jatt hZI. iii4ir ,,•::-.s.,.+,,..„.., .,,7. •./, - -1 ithaNy,..,-• •-,.:,....-Jiy , ,-,t-• ..,,,,: „,,..1...,.,•eri .., ..J...-tt , ,....nr. • ;:,,,, ..4.. i i ...,;=;ta----•',,W. .;'1' ,'",' IE .,'" ul ,i r.: .”7,4+ 01/4 "ar„ -„V.' 6,-,1... 'I.. .. 4 •'..-k1 r its,,,c5,... , . ,:., ,,, : ,: ., ,r.,.....-,-.,-,1,-3 cniA.,,i,-43.4 57- , 1/4,'-‘‘,•,',.‘,. 1,4-....:,..,5 • - I. ci 59. .r".;il.6',-<:,;,iti 9V-1,1 IS'. -:. 1„•4....,‘-.P; Wit I;'■ i• ^---):C.ti, ..;- ' • -.. r- ,!I 17,7kr, ,7 , , - , ,4.-r,;1/4D-:.,' . , .. ., 1. ) :c, :.,,..:„A:11'1/2x\rF.' -1tri" t:{.',,, :r•ir--- ' - hj.q;;V;y .•I.L';.•,:t.'-`,Ct, - ::::_11/47.777. •1/4:: ' ; :.;,,:f.11, .irli,s-a i• ;,...„•6,'; ; li‘ 9:17:: ••:, I ! r.,L1'7...-•?•:.:.i7Y4 a':V.' ,, . .r)..)-Y174. -.,..._t- riac-,::;;•„ • •)::::,itrl'gr,ezg-, >if,-;:01.•;,,. V 1 - 'II' !i4 gltri' 11 s,t.t• h.C•irraia-, t 1:k.y.t.•,..:';,-, ,rar • 1,- s.; - 'et • ., "-,k -,--"L--,' . .; .-4 - .."2,1,-=•- . • . . 2 -:1'lk ti=4.''211.t!;,..1.ct. *74:;..; '1;.--.- -°•-•""'1 .--,;j- ..wrr A i•,,;''. . r.-&- - c-gfi,.-t wdl. t .`tniki "cly:• --'44;,`' - .„"5:::t.-,-,, ,7-74.,."—Adr•-• - L-...74'7:4.:F7k,-_-•- -.77.7-4.---7.. vs,ft--,;:;a, - !agi . ,-•ti r11.<-7P'- .t;,---, -)-44 . -----i ' . C. rt'-11,■: .451--\ It-'''::-.- "..:', %Ir. ,“,, Orcp.,- .a;•-1 - r------- in"---- ÷ . • ■ 4.r.:tef-9-7'.- .....4,-.-.E• i' .1 ,..--1, ._,t-atC,' : ...It s' .i...- ,;11" ti vi.;;: ,,....,..„,,..f.. . .„.: _: tr . _..,....;.,crt.., _ , tr-A.7.1,t) '2;_,' :;1'11-- ... ,'''.. r..1.,Ii-i...7.4v,. i 0 igl,...--J•r:--.'' 541 :-.i.',E7 tz.-:.I.:=;:ill-i'--44;1.-rxijic t-rAt *';c ';'-k:8 '1'1 Ir:::. `-:-. ' 's. ...k, i:-.4:,ry •:,L-,-, ; I' 0 .,---; _4=-1' ,e, f:ail 1,,Litrit,1)„..,. .-41,sw., ‘,:... :3 . ",. a CA2ti- .,::-ZitmjC•±. t.1, 11,1V-PrI114 I.i;11-,w,a.-- • E.:fa, fr,tir.1 aiLairj.Ult,..4.\ 61k="..Itli.....1'., s...,C: ..._.--1 .:,,...4,-,,.pc. :Ir.. :,11:VC.'• - t-,---4tr.--:- : op"- i.... .:,17:. 1-::::t-rc,\ ''-74:0k4,•Z..!-.,- 'Vb. Ail.'+'■,s\le:.‘,1";.5,s2a3.1.1%, ,41W,V.'.;:iriy :fel. fl.11 ',till'1:r,u. _--_;•.!,- e • '42'..L.' , . .i t-'.. It4.,,i.tat',:: ::- 3-;Xt.,':4:,4;. j';',-,r,..44,.. t4:ide-::-N.,■i '''',"1“;41,flti.1::-1:9-. '7 i'l....A.*:■ , ---.:-;,.ilvirt: .t.:-.12.,".11," :,,iiii...1-7:71_ Hptzel-- .47.:„..3;09,„--'flit A........-.*?,..14,:c,,,,-.tf,-..a.„:r.,..,,...curt-,,,,,,v,-)-...j.„.r„--„, i,l.. ,.....iitte. ,,t;2.;-..a.„---,,,-....i. :!::::•,:7-1-0. _ : -._.,;,_:. .9.- ,44-;.,...,,,;:-.:4,:514.1±:-:--- i-m.F!vs .,,,----fie-:._.--4-: t.t.i..4. ty\--cy;::,-Le>._(-±„tri,si-s, 13;;,,,...,4,:4;;r 1,02 i ze. 4,: 4,..,i,,c.:-,. • . ,. 7:4.2.1,,.. ,pt 4'73" 'ia- P.Str-ires tir,:=4,49‘,,f-ci".-4-•-ziei,..._ --.‘,,z,...,4-ik-A,...gt,:ies,,, :4-11/4;d-t-i,r:-.4,.,i'ia2,5 ',.41154 . l'-.v r'-'' ,. zr tyt?'° f..ki.41141 3111, jai'giL.C,M i.a3"::.- ' : 'IOW , ''''‘.'1' .er r -I .a..."4 - • ."'".-a.4 11-; ii..iff.a."4.5.:7 t .,......1.4... i '11;44;14,7ktis f..,:--likIttl'l 4 TM- ' •z:! ,..,--, ir.-....=tE ._.:At; i -.2,0 ...,iit, - f\ flr):".• -7r-C7''.. I'r• ••• •-• TS 1:-. i .”0.131,47:131C:tri • 1,7452■1" .:a_„:tr..r 2„...-t. '4 .„.--•;:•••" 4 ••••-,„,.. "...." ;'et- nt,,2-t1-2,in 1 -. ,,,,56,—_---,„. -.‘, ,, • .14i 3,13:tareti]C;V 44w+.;-....;...1.e. . is ;.-__14:1 ._:. -es.,., „1, trFA:94i1.0t3-;I, irri kr: :-., ,:. ,,,, -...,,, ,,,E:a-‘,4 - 1. ;,..:,..r-...4. ; - -, -w- -7-F-flittm:ii.trc,- -.714 t -spiTh 4-;:i.,./sffk, liv., -dt_i.-a_i 3- 4-,i. ,. ,..„ .}i., :•:g c4,:,„: ,I,t,,I.tp...7-4-7F--7.;:i. i.-;,I iz,i7:11,:..„,:'"14.-. --- ke--,-•*., ,Thr,,,;,,r. „,..J,...0•7 . ..,.._ re,7-iii.;.. ' , uiv-•4 7- 11'.5: r - _..,- .-, ,,,,cri,,. -- - ,,. , ri 44.4: •., .4„.?„-..,_ 2,,:, --.-t _ . -,,I:2_...m•• _-. . • - .,-•..!,..76/..e.4' vt;......".2174.r..... . '-. :::413., tit:it .,- : '4?:".^"?'-'24. .; 4 . ' $2•:-.C1":"#;----2r1"1-7Th't-rtc" .*::.1.....His--.';',Th"7,i,%. .. 42.7.2';'7.-2.•7".7._::::•;:“.•, _-t ;:---.7-7r---- 4-::- • ._ . . ,...._. .,..___ ,".:_---.., , . _. .......... — ..i.,i, ,. % (. „, iii. r : - -- .-,---J-2_7.7:751- ...-t-7,-.-L.L' -:----.. ..- -;----Hr.:--•-..i.--,.-;-; -_. -,:• --.i i u-L,--,,, 4-7.,,,,v-,:t. r. - r. tes. . • - . L.:4"--.-,--------,:- ig.;.2,,-,•-•:,17-. : vitg' 11". :ix; 4sit,pv,I. . .... . .,-,,3g m 4,,rte,k, _.1, _ 4., ___v_ ..gy --n- ,'44; tri-,.-•-•-, -nr-,Mr ,,,. , f_r 1. -1,15..fis..-a . 44a- , 10 4.0_,--"-- iT,I ''' - ./ It ' . t,41.E.--Cr r 7:::- ;.1....: - 1.,..tEste....-.2±04.> c -r• . 4 jilarY-• 4,4"rricr;_Yak,. T rer4'-1 EXHIBIT B B & C - 9 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith February 16, 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - CALEAST PHELAN 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC - A proposal to develop an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 11 buildings and 11 parcels on a property of 19.35 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 3, located at the south side of 8th Street approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue - APN: 0209- 151-27 and 37. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - CALEAST PHELAN 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC - A proposal to subdivide a property of 19.35 acres in conjunction with the development of an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 11 buildings in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 3, located at the south side of 8th Street approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue - APN: 0209-151-27 and -37. Related file: Development Review DRC2007-00551, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. Design Parameters: The project site is comprised of two (2) parcels with a combined area of about 841,000 square feet (19 acres). The project site is triangular in shape and is approximately 1,100 feet (east to west) at its widest point along 8th Street and 260 feet (east to west) at its narrowest point along 7th Street. It is approximately 1 ,200 feet (north to south). The site is vacant; vegetation is limited to low grasses and a small grouping of trees. The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1,100 feet and 1,075 feet, respectively. The property is bound on the west by the Cucamonga flood control channel and beyond that there are single-family residences in the City of Ontario. To the east, are industrial office/warehouse buildings and an operations facility for Verizon. To the north, is property owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is the site for a proposed Public Works Administration building and a household hazardous waste facility that is currently being reviewed by the Planning Department (Development Review DRC2009-00882). The property to the south is vacant. The zoning of the property and the properties to the north and east is General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 2) and General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), respectively. The zoning of the properties to the south is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. The applicant proposes to construct 11 office/warehouse buildings ranging in floor area between 130,019 square feet (Building A) to 5,342 square feet (Building L). The proposal includes the subdivision of the project site into eleven (11) parcels that will correspond with each building. The combined floor area of all the buildings will be 382,858 square feet. Because of the shape of the project site, the largest buildings are located at the north side of the site and the smallest buildings are located at the south side of the site. A central, north to south drive aisle provides the primary access to all of the buildings and the associated parking, storage, and loading areas for each building. This drive aisle passes through the site and link 7th and 8th Streets. This drive aisle is 38 feet wide and exceeds the minimum width required by both the Planning and Fire Departments, which require 24 feet and 26 feet, respectively. No tenants have been specified at this time; the buildings are speculative. The basic layout of each building will be typical for warehouse buildings. With the exception of Buildings J, K, and L, all of the buildings will have dedicated docks for loading/unloading. Buildings J, K, • and L will have roll-up doors for loading/unloading purposes. All of the buildings will have their respective offices and entrances along the central drive aisle. The loading/unloading areas will be screened from public view by walls and/or the building. In addition to the central drive aisle, there will be EXHIBIT" J 8 & C- 38 DRC ACTION AGENDA • DRC2007-00551 AND SUBTPM18794 — CALEAST PHELAN 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC February 16, 2010 Page 2 secondary access point to the site; however, because of the layout of the site, the use of it will be most likely limited to the tenant(s) of Building A. Parking for employees and visitors will be generally arranged along the central drive aisle and near the office entrances. The combined required parking is 396 stalls; . 426 parking stalls will be provided. The combined required trailer storage/parking is 38 stalls. The applicant is providing 28 stalls, pending the approval of a Minor Exception ( DRC2008-00152). Landscape coverage is 10 percent; the minimum requirement for this Development District is 12 percent. The proposed buildings will be of concrete tilt-up construction. Each building will be painted with a palette of three colors; there will be some variation so that the each building will be painted a different set of three colors. The boldest or darkest of the three colors (that will comprise each palette) will be at the general area around the offices of each building. An additional primary material will be form-lined concrete applied on the wall panels at various locations on each building with glass panels serving as a secondary material. Glass has been proposed at the offices areas and at various locations along the wall planes of each building. At the office entrances of each building, there will be a trellis feature. The greatest degree of wall articulation will occur at the corners of the building. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. • 1. Per Table 17.30.040, the minimum landscape coverage in General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3) is 12 percent (97,182 square feet). The proposed landscape coverage is at 10.5 percent (85,015 square feet) and must be increased accordingly. Note: On the plans submitted on November 2008 that the City reviewed and deemed to be complete for processing, the landscape coverage that was provided was 13.1 percent (106,315 square feet) and, therefore, complied with this requirement. 2. Per Section 17.30.040(C) — Minimum Parcel Size, the minimum parcel size in General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3) is 0.5 acre or 21,780 square feet. Parcels K and L are deficient in area and need to be increased in area accordingly. Note: On the plans submitted on November 2008 that the City reviewed and deemed to be complete for processing, the area for each parcel provided is different from the area for each parcel'in the set submitted for Committee review. 3. Per Section 17.30.080(D) — Special Considerations, the minimum building setback from the street is 45 feet (measured from the curb), and the minimum parking setback is 35 feet (measured from the curb) when an adjacent property across the street is within a residential district. The parcel to the south of the project site, across 7th Street, is residentially zoned and this requirement applies. The proposed setbacks from Building K and, more significantly, Building L to the curb at 7th Street must be increased accordingly. 4. Trellis feature at the primary entrance to each building: a. The overhead members of each trellis feature are proposed to be constructed of wood. The Committee has indicated in the past a preference for polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or metal for durability. The applicant should change the material to PVC or metal to be consistent with • this policy. The vertical supports should be constructed of the same material. • B & C- 39 DRC ACTION AGENDA •DRC2007-00551 AND SUBTPM18794— CALEAST PHELAN 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC February 16, 2010 Page 3 • b. The base of each column of the trellis feature is finished with ledgestone decorative veneer. Although the use of various materials is consistent with the City's design standards and policies, the use of this material should not be limited to only the column bases of each trellis. The applicant should apply the veneer to other parts of the building. In the past where decorative veneers were used on similar industrial projects, the veneer was applied to the entire face of the tower elements at the office entrances. The applicant may also want to consider the use of a tile veneer instead of ledgestone and expand the use of the tile as noted above. c. Provide trellises at the sides of each building immediately adjacent to the side where the proposed trellises at the building entrances are located. For example, Building A has a trellis at the south side of the office area — add another to the east side of the office area (see attached Sheet A-9). d. The design .of the trellises at the lunch areas shall match the trellises at the building entrances. 5. Incorporate along the top of the parapet of all buildings a chamfered edge (or equivalent). Also, to further differentiate the office areas from the warehousing areas of each building, incorporate a decorative cornice (or equivalent) along the top of the parapet of the wall planes at the office • entrances (see Sheet A-14). 6. Increase the application of form-lined concrete to include more of the wall panels that are adjacent to the office areas of each building in order the meet the requirement of two primary materials. Provide form-lined concrete on Buildings J, K, and L as these buildings do not have this finish like the other buildings. Similarly, provide more form-lined concrete at various intervals along the wall planes of each of the larger buildings as there are expanses of wall panels where the distance between the form-lined concrete that is proposed is several hundred feet (see Sheet A-14). 7. Increase the application of glass to include more of the wall panels that are adjacent to the office areas of each building. 8. Provide a raised parapet, and change the material/color used at the southwest corner of Buildings B and E to match Building A. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. There are parking stalls at various locations throughout the site that are only 16 feet in depth. The minimum depth, with a one-foot overhang into a planter area or sidewalk, is 17 feet. These will need to be revised accordingly per Section 17.12.030(A)(1) of the Development Code. 2. Revise the width of the planters located along the north side of Building B; in the parking/maneuvering area between Buildings B and E; and along the north side of Building H so that they comply with the required minimum interior dimension of 5 feet (not including the 6-inch • concrete curb) (see Sheet A-2). • B & C- 40 • DRC ACTION AGENDA • DRC2007-00551 AND SUBTPM18794 — CALEAST PHELAN 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC February 16, 2010 Page 4 3. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon (minimum) sized tree per Section 17.12.030(A)(11)(a) of the Development Code. 4. Provide a 5-foot wide planter with 6-inch concrete curb in the parking/maneuvering area along the west property line between Buildings B and E; Buildings E and H; and Buildings H and K per Section 17.12.030(A)(11)(b) of the Development Code (see Sheet A-2). 5. Trees shall be planted adjacent to structures and property lines at a rate one 15-gallon (minimum) sized tree per 30 horizontal linear feet of building dimension or 30 feet of property line dimension per Section 17.12.030(E)(4)(b) and (c) of the Development Code. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All groundmounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. 2. All Double Detector Checks (DDCs) and Fire Department Connections (FDCs) shall be screened on three sides behind the 4-foot high walls. The walls shall incorporate the design and materials used on the buildings. • 3. The employee lunch area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. 4. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. 5. Incorporate undulating berms along the street frontages (where applicable), within the landscape setback and landscape areas. The highest part of the berms should be at least 3 feet in height. 6. Decorative paving shall be provided at all vehicular access points onto the site. Decorative paving is already proposed at the main drive entrances at 7th and 8th Streets, but it is missing from the secondary access point located on the west side of Building A. 7. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 8. Provide durable street furniture in outdoor employee eating area, such as tables, chairs, waste receptacles. 9. All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. Staff Recommendation: With the primary and secondary issues addressed to the satisfaction of the Committee, staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. • • B & C- 41 • • DRC ACTION AGENDA • DRC2007-00551 AND SUBTPM18794— CALEAST PHELAN 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC February 16, 2010 Page 5 Design Review Committee Action:. The Committee reviewed the application and deemed it unacceptable for forwarding to the Planning Commission for review and action. The Committee concluded that the architecture of the proposed buildings was not satisfactory and inconsistent with the City's design standards. The applicant must provide more glass and textured concrete, and increase the horizontal and vertical articulation of the wall planes at various locations to reduce the expanse of flat wall planes (especially on large buildings such as Building A). Also, along the top edge of the parapets a chamfered edge or cornice at the tower elements must be incorporated. The Committee also directed the applicant to revise the parking arrangement for some of the buildings so that the parking areas for employees/visitors were separated as much as possible from the truck loading/unloading areas. Lastly, the applicant was directed to provide separate lunch areas for each building instead of the proposed combined/shared lunch areas. The applicant did address some of the major issues, including relocating Buildings K and L so that each complied with the building setback, adjusting the size of each parcel in order to comply with the required minimum parcel size applicable to this Development District, and correcting the landscape coverage calculations. The revised plans are to be submitted for review by the Committee prior to review and action by the Planning Commission. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger • Staff Planner: Mike Smith • 8 & C-42 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Mike Smith June 15, 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A proposal to subdivide a property of 19.35 acres in conjunction with the development of an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 11 buildings in the General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), located at the south side of 8th Street approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue - APN: 0209-151-27 and -37. Related files: Development Review DRC2007-00551, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A proposal to develop an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 11 buildings and 11 parcels on a property of 19.35 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), located at the south side of 8th Street approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue - APN: 0209- 151-27 and -37. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. Background: This application was previously reviewed by the Design Review Committee February 16, 2010. The Committee reviewed the application and deemed it unacceptable for forwarding to the Planning Commission for review and action. The Committee concluded that the architecture of the • proposed buildings was not satisfactory and inconsistent with the City's design standards. The applicant must provide more glass and textured concrete and increase the horizontal and vertical articulation of the wall planes at various locations to reduce the expanse of flat wall planes. Also, along the top edge of the parapets, a chamfered edge or cornice at the tower elements must be incorporated. The Committee also directed the applicant to revise the parking arrangement for some of the buildings so that the parking areas for employees/visitors were separated as much as possible from the truck loading/unloading areas. Lastly, the applicant was directed to provide separate lunch areas for each building instead of the proposed combined/shared lunch areas (Exhibit A). Staff Comments: In response to the Committee's comments and major issues outlined in the previous Committee report, the applicant has revised their proposal as follows (refer to Exhibits B and C for comparison and notes). 1. Provide more glass. Comment: At the office towers of the larger buildings and the office "pods" of the smaller building, the previous proposal had glass panels that were interrupted horizontally and vertically by the respective horizontal and vertical sections of the adjoining concrete panels. The new proposal has more glass panels which results in a continuous glass fascia that "wraps" horizontally around the corner of each office area and extends vertically from the finished grade to the second floor. Additional glass also has been incorporated at several locations, including the northeast corner of Building A and northwest corner of Building C. This is a positive step as these corners "frame" the. entrance into the site from 8th Street. However, there are areas where glass is minimal or non- existent. Staff recommends that glass be added at the following locations: west elevation of Building B; north, south, east, and west elevations of Building E and J, respectively; east elevations • of Buildings D, F, and G; north and west elevation of Building H; west elevation of Building K; and east elevation of Building L. • EXHIBIT K B & C-43 DRC AGENDA • SUBTPM18974 AND DRC2007-00551 — PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY June 15, 2010 Page 2 2. Provide more textured concrete. Comment: The previous proposal had form-lined concrete that was generally limited to the office areas. As noted above, the glass at the office areas is continuous because of the elimination of the horizontal sections of the concrete panel. These removed sections were form-lined; although portions of the panels immediately adjacent to the office areas are now form-lined, the net result is that the new proposal does not incorporate a substantial addition of form-lined concrete on the buildings. Staff recommends additional form-lined concrete to the building. 3. Increase the horizontal and vertical articulation of the wall planes at various locations to reduce the expanse of flat wall planes. Comment: To provide vertical articulation at all of the office areas, a freestanding vertical concrete panel (fin) has been added. The primary axis of each fin will be perpendicular to, and approximately 12 inches from, the wall plane. The fins will vary in overall dimension in order to be proportional in size with varying overall height and floor area of each building. The height of the fins will range between approximately 16 to 22 feet, and the width of the fins will range between approximately 6 to 8 feet. Overall thickness for each will be approximately 18 inches. This feature will enhance and define the office areas. They will have horizontal metal bands that will visually coordinate with the metal canopies above the office entrances. At the office areas, the parapets have been modified to include a decorative cap at the top edge. To provide horizontal articulation along the long wall planes of the larger buildings, the applicant • proposes freestanding vertical concrete panels at the north elevation of Building A, the east elevations of Buildings B, and the west elevations of C, F, and G. The height of each will be 25 feet, and the width will be 8 feet. The overall thickness for each will be approximately 18 inches. These fins will not have any decorative finish such as form-lining. Although the proposed panels will provide visual interest by interrupting the expanse of simple wall planes, staff recommends that the width of the panels be increased to match the width of a typical wall panel (approximately 20 to 25 feet) so that the articulation is more substantial. Also, these panels should be form-lined; this form-lining will have the added benefit of satisfying the request for more textured concrete (item #2). Additional horizontal and vertical articulation has been incorporated at some of the corner lowers" of the larger buildings by varying the horizontal relationship of the adjacent wall panels and increasing the height of the parapets. This change has been made at the northeast corner of Building A and the northwest corner of Building C. 4. Provide separate lunch areas for each building instead of the proposed combined/shared lunch areas. Comment: The applicant has revised the proposal accordingly. Each building now has a dedicated lunch area. 5. Revise the entry feature so that the design including materials, finish, and colors are consistent with the architectural theme of the buildings. . Comment: The previous proposal had an overhead wood trellis with ledge stone-finished columns • at the entrance to each building. These features have been replaced with conventional metal canopies. B & C- 44 • DRC AGENDA SUBTPM18974 AND DRC2007-00551 — PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY June 15, 2010 Page 3 6. Incorporate along the top of the parapet of all buildings a chamfered edge (or equivalent). Also, to further differentiate the office areas from the warehousing areas of each building incorporate a decorative cornice (or equivalent) along the top of the parapet of the wall planes at the office entrances. Comment: The applicant has complied with part of this request by adding a decorative cornice on the parapet above the office "towers." However, the chamfered edge (or equivalent) that was required along the parapet elsewhere on each building is not shown on the revised plans. Staff recommends that this decorative detail be incorporated as previously requested. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. The width of the planters located in the parking/maneuvering area between Buildings B and E and along the north side of Building H must be revised to comply with the required minimum interior dimension of 5 feet (not including the 6-inch concrete curb) (see Sheet A-2). This was stated previously, but does not appear to have been addressed. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. • None. The applicant indicated during the Committee review meeting that they would comply with the policies stated in the previous report. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved subject to the completion of the recommended revisions, to be verified by staff, and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed the application and deemed it acceptable for forwarding to the Planning Commission for review and action. The Committee concluded that the applicant had satisfactorily revised the architecture and various components of the site layout in response to the Committee's comments to the Design Review Committee meeting on February 16, 2010. The Committee determined that the architecture of the office areas for each industrial building, a key point of discussion during the last meeting, was sufficiently revised and was now consistent with the level of architecture expected for industrial projects. The freestanding tilt-up panels along various elevations of some of the buildings were determined to be sufficient in the overall dimensions to satisfy the request to provide articulation along the wall planes of those buildings. They gave the applicant the option of either finishing these panels with form-lined concrete or matching the pattern used on the "fins." The Committee requested the addition of two more "fins" at the northwest corner of Building C and northeast corner of Building A in order to enhance and frame the drive entry into the project site as seen from 8th Street. The Committee agreed with staff and directed the applicant to provide more glass on the elevations of • each building that were most visible from the center drive aisle (principally in the areas that were "in front" of the 8-foot high screen walls, i.e. the portions of the wall elevations that were closest to the office areas). They also agreed with staff and directed the applicant to provide glass panels on the east elevations of all the buildings along the east side of the center drive aisle. The Committee did not believe B & C-45 DRC AGENDA • SUBTPM18974 AND DRC2007-00551 — PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY June 15, 2010 Page 4 it was necessary to provide glass panels on the west elevations of all the buildings along the west side of the center drive aisle (the elevations that would face the flood control channel). The applicant was also directed to provide a decorative chamfered edge along the top of each parapet of the buildings where there is currently no decorative treatment provided. The Committee agreed with staff's suggestions for revising the landscaping, including the use of different types of trees other than Italian Cypress and the enhancement of the drive aisle intersections with more trees and landscaping. The Committee eliminated the need for landscape planters in two areas where the aesthetic value of these planters would be limited due to planting restrictions caused by an underlying Metropolitan Water District (MWD) easement or lack of sufficient space to allow the planting of trees and appropriate groundcover that would be practical to maintain and/or would survive in the long term. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith Attachments: Exhibit A — Design Review Committee Action Comments (February 16,2010) Exhibit B— Proposed Elevations (February 16, 2010) Exhibit C — Proposed Elevations (June 15, 2010) S • B & C-46 CITY OF RAN�F`" Ct1CRnfiOf�GR '" JUL 7 20� ENVIRONMENTAL • PtrGcl`lE`� PLANNING INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) iiin t t City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to-inform the City of the•basic"components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances; and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality' Act;!. and the City's ,Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA:Lit,la important:that the.information•requested:in this . application be-provided in full -: ,, GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. /n��f}({� ��►�w���-ag-�f pp(-/fir. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: ` " ' . 77' / Project Title: Phelan Center Cucamonga ((! • Name&Address of projectowner(s): Cal East Phelan 8th and Vineyard LLC 23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor: Vineyard JP/DF, LLC 23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Contact Person&Address: Terri Allen 23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 120 , Newport Beach, CA 92660 Name&Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): • • Telephone Number: 949-720-8000 EnvironmentalinfoForml.doc - Page 1 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4:09 PM EXHIBIT L B & C-47 • PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: • Information indicated by an asterisk(`)is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. *1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): The site is bounded by 8th Street to the north, Cucamonga Creek Channel to the west, industrial properties to the east and vacant land to the south. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 020 915 127, 020 915 137 • "5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 19 . 09 acres, 831, 560 SF *6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 18 . 59 acres dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site • (attach additional sheet if necessary): None . 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Standard permits will apply for industrial development including but not limited to grading, building, fire, electrical, plumbing and mechanical . No special permits or exceptional uses are planned. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information(i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The site is currently unimproved. Historically, the site has been used . for agricultural purposes or has been vacant . Remains of 2 small concrete structures exist on the site with their former use unknown. There are 3 trees on the site site but no other plants, animals, trails or • EnvironmentallnfoForml.doc Page 2 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4:09 PM B & C-48 scenic aspects exist . Geotechnical surveys confirm the topography slopes to the southwest and toward the Cucamonga Creek channel . • Soils are considerable suitable for industrial development . Environmental testing shows no known environmental or hazardous contamination on the site . • 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books, published reports and oral history): The site has been vacant land or used for agricultural purposes since the 1930 ' s . Searches were conducted via chain of title, USGS • maps, city, county, state and municipal records, historical city and street directories, regulatory databases and aerial photos . 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft, roadway noise, etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: Train tracks running along 8th Street to the north of the site as well as developed industrial properties to the north and along the east property line all produce some degree of noise which affects the site . 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: The project will consist of 11 single story, concrete tilt up industrial buildings consistent with the current zoning and planning. The project will begin construction upon completion of the entitlement process . The project is planned to be built in a single phase with a total construction time from grading to completion • estimated at 10-11 months . The buildings will range in size from 5, 200 SF to 131, 000 SF and will promote a variety of industrial EnvironmentallnfoForml.doc Page 3 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4:09 PM B & C- 49 and warehouse distribution uses to the benefit of the surrounding • community. • 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use(one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): North - industrial development, railroad tracks East - industrial development runs the length of the property West - single family residential separated by 150 ' from property line by Cucamonga Creek channel, access road and block retaining wall South - vacant land, residential located to the south east 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No, the project conforms to the general plan and current zoning. The development is consistent with the industrial developments currently existing to the north of the site and to the east . 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these • noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Short term and temporary construction noise will be generated during the building phase . Long term noise to be consistent with anticipated industrial uses . Dock doors are oriented to face opposite of residential uses . *16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: 3 trees will be removed. Trees and plant material will be installed as part of the industrial park development in accordance with the design guidelines . 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: None . • EnvironmentallnfoForml.doc Page 4 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4:09 PM B & C- 50 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please . contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. • Residential(gal/day) Peak use(gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) 3 , 000/gal Peak use(gal/min/ac) 10 gal/min/ac 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank ® Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) 1, 500/gal RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): • 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: • • EnvironmentallnfoForml.doc Page 5 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4:09 PM B & C- 51 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate • School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High:: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: Warehousing, distribution, assembly and permitted general industrial uses as contemplated in the Sub area 3 , GI designation. 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: Approximately 408 , 000 SF of industrial space with internal office as required by each user. 27) Indicate hours of operation: To be determined by user, anticipate standard industrial use per GI designation. 28) Number of employees: Total: Varies by bldg, approx. 365 • Maximum Shift: To be determined by users Time of Maximum Shift: To be determined by users 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): Drivers, warehouse workers , administrative and management personnel consistent with general industrial uses . 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: Unknown. *31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818) 572-6283): Air pollution sources and amounts anticipated per standard uses permitted within general industrial classification. • EnvironmentallnfoForml.doc Page 6 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4:09 PM B & C- 52 • ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. Yes , utility providers and fire services have been contacted to verify services and capacity. Site development will include extension of services and connection points . Responses indicate proposed development is feasible. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides and herbicides;fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of . the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. A Phase I and limited Phase II environmental survey have been completed and the consultant ' s search of appropriate records data shows no known historical use or discharge of the above mentioned items . As some agricultural use is known, pesticides may have been used but no further information is known. No underground storage exists . • 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. None anticipated at this time . I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: / jam/ Signature: ' a Title: /Oft,(mil 3)IY2C r • EnvironmentallnfoForml.doc Page 7 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4:09 PM B & C- 53 • ATTACHMENT A • Water Usage • Average use per day Residential Single Family 600 gal/day Apt/Condo 400 gal/day Commercial/Industrial General and Regional Commercial 3,000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1,500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 2,500 gal/day/ac Industrial Park 3,000 gal/day/ac Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2.0 Sewer Flows • Residential Single Family 270 gal/day Apt/Condos 200 gal/day Commercial/Industrial • General Commercial 2,000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1,000 gal/day/ac General Industrial 1,500 gal/day/ac Heavy Industrial 3,000 gal/day/ac Source: Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 6/00 • • EnvironmentallnfoFOrmi.doc Page 8 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4:09 PM B & C- 54 ATTACHMENT B • Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 • Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 • High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 • EnvironmentallnfoFormt.doc Page 9 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4:09 PM B & C- 55 Page 1of1 Sx y� 1 f I 1 :- ■.Mn 1 4 1 o.l +' ~#'`K � FA Zt .4 •L '� t .+ f -,„,..-:•:;.:- �x.. (�7 ✓•a'.� ... 7 .e.--•i4--..1.4400--14.F _ 1 � , vC � • r .wilt e L 3 4473: +`` � It4 I \ " i xaria-T;t¢ 1 Cv a iyy + ' .f, p\ u,r" _ ' r &.o' ,E : a I I via' �' ,St��+&v I'' ni v it s i,..-e^'. t yJ1J. 1i.. '_,- � r tir4Y ` i, rr-.- ' y t,V.Ai.+iaq "'k.$•:At ri,:cpt"Rklei 1 . ii s e 1b i-ru IC ,� !var w.If + ♦ ih its°.0 4f, ti$s�x a W4, al "'' \? ti 't +5xT,c¢ v d r ar as + �'^""ti r„ +. 7 - ,}u� i. x d l; a l"'ryt,�1 a.r w 3 fa Ix r ��dA.:SUn r a�. wx� T..�'l. L,...- 'wnku""S-�,e4 "m...$`� Srru-a-+�,r .s�Yfz.`d luk{£a - 7 ,' a ,.,n .Att1 Sri-'= a , ``a- U' t .. n " Pt " a la � ... + v` 141s I` dt `� G 7r] e V+ . N '� zl 7J it fr 1;4x} `air 6. OV:r. • MUM' a c f] _4 o- / It = p Ir- --r dl. :TV'S x "r t \ 4 M l �- l . /,'2,,,, A `^:.V. �! :1 - I ': ! !E ollve;S[ �!`e'� mac, '+' iny ,t v4 6 _ r� s t 1' "'� 1i Gt h ry4 i 1 R�g L a t�yJ \ it ally 4'64 " '81 , 1 r ° }}7 lrrsft :;,r}vc5' '_' ' x� \ x 1 Yvn:sNy! ),: y 61 'S ll ,' :' N i -, ,t r, .. ,4 i �4 Willi,Py�.- '" .'11.. f JI, y 19 i Al i i•"V '1""..7=7;-ii.C i 1n N 1 1, r r I {`VI 4 itlr t t:rt� s � , � + i FYi" ��I f q � c L 4L, A, •a 1 Lin, 1 `h a F i r r�°'r.I .Ontario` , a L ,4' 1 + + E i Lam ' ? es.Cr .s i I . 1• 1 t PA ,,I ; g t. , -r -,Ip 2, ' -i l° {� u+ p _ to r i�c --,-, 7 r 5�cac ., it "+ 4 s � ..a^°,^ V Wes-; sral . 7.051J tti -f 1• 1 ]p t n * r I r¢f... "p+ ".“ i• `Y A 4'¶r2 �ly 1 r C''' C' D ++' C44A'r f Y,. iiL \ 9 N � i �a` 4'' fw.z K IZ n 1 ,. ,1 .p G.?L,y y% Ii±QitV F 9�r I 1 � 40. i�Ar-RI 64 it ;14 l+s'1}f t. P f -. w�`Nap'�� :, 8th and Vineyard site A � . 300ft '=i I N LandV isi onLite c, t * ' at Photo Site Map •tL{r,_, Copyright 02006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the contributor supplied under license and may not be approved e>cept as licensed by Digital Map Products. • • B & C- 56 http://maps.digitalmapcentral.com/production/Land V isionLite/v07_01_034/index.html 7/12/2007 e .. . _ .. ... _ . . . . . . . ,.. . -.— ..s-t-- .:-,-;';',.•,--'7.-;,;*:''..-' 00-14,4, *-=(:-',"' fr;q`a'.° 4''''''',k.'''''' . , . _ . ..,..._ . . . . _. _ . •. ,,• . . . . - -• : . . • ..; ...• - , . ...... ..... ,. ,_,.. - - ,- ,--,..z-,..,-.._-_,..,-..--;,•,w4.. .":•.-::..-.;,-.. ,-.,,,-, ,:.-,....,::.-,.. . _ . .. - -: .; . ... ,,.. _... .. ...... .......... ....... _ r _ "N; . "t • C."1- 's ,)rc.- . 1 -T--3_ , I. V 1 t: i-i-i ji/,..),..-1--1) --r—p. ,.:i tiv-t ( E. ,F) 't I • . 1- 0 • ' • • . .. .. • • , - - - • - •• • .. , •-, . _^ • , . - • - -- -- --_ ' , - • '.^ -' --•. ,. --•,-,-. - -,-.•`,- ....-7,.....-- --• '.,•.,,'.----. . 7". - ••T;c6; '1-e•-.Ate'ar'...,=-:.;-':• ,,,,,Z;,;,.‘",-; .- ,,,,,,,,',,,....e..4,4,-;'",e•-,-.N• e. ,-eier,-.-..-1';'''-'," ; ese-.'...e.: ee,-.-.:.;:... `,."'...,-' ',,.•.'4,"...`1,,,ge ,,.--'-.,-J'er..,..'"r.' -1,,,,-"'", .'-'-''''''`...-■?Y' 77'-'.'- '....'-'7'''-›,,.,e-":_''-''7--', . -''.''''''''',. •,.-' -.•,,f., .:;'.7". C" ':'''''',•..-. ..,, .,Sit.,_,:,--,-1.,,_..:7?-1:-,y,...;,,'" . '...., .' , '''....7"'',Itt-,'■=.:4, ii:',.,;:.,:,,,,,.,-,11=1-7,:..?.— wiwz..--4.:'''';`,.--7%.'"r'' ''... •-•4'•-- ''' ..''.17,-*-.!..-'' ,- -5,7%.71".-,?.:2';';117.--, .i'•. ,, ,.`4:,:',.,--7.:;Ii.',-.-:''''-.:;.-''''-'''..'''''''''-"-"C.:--- '"."''''' - ' : - - - - ' ' .' - ' -'-''''' • . ....._ ._ __ • - .,-- , .r ._..,-4... • ' 2'. V (_,-/''''. ...' , ti! , 4:•.4)....,'' T.-.7.--(:t.'.' ' B & C - 57 • � ^�. ill Of- ( �.. ,.(. Lt L.l: ,.'vf{ `� �' j • . yp!�YI">r��-..s+'1 i$ "' d•'_ J^ R r _ B & C - 58 ` ..4.6Zitt;;:42V.71 -'11i,t7,77 ;' .4, _ . c V. eSE Af1“,7 (' . `•- • 1. I • • -- . _ . " cLi t.) .; cr. ‘i'\.; (:)f- t. B & C - 59 .. . .•,_ •• • . , , • - . .• r'• . • , • -■ _ • _ . it** • . _ - . • . • • , •. • - • Vie g:, .")• , . . _ . . •. - , • • . . . , . • „ . . • • ". • . k.„ • ' ' - ,. 4"•- •-• ;4- 'Ntlf !..`f . , --„ • ••‘- • - e. fe, cie B & C - 60 • Site Photograhs Exhibit • - o 6 • • 4 8 7 egr, Location/direction of site photo. (compass directions acceptable for all photos) B & C- 61 Page 1 of 1 ,e ' 4 I L. ~ 'ti Vr4 . ro i. :r s .ri ; :; sz I pw , re Icily r # mar r.,ti r �\ /// i .�.1 1E-11--�=:. �� _ im® im 1l0I:IpSa .. 'r'oI° .i \Yz,�± e. FR —_ r r0 •- b ... . ® cam s$ � "'-��, �°?' ', ....� ancho I � "Shrift.' v lw s y�tr' , .......0.-pp Jt`d »ge---- I . l.-1 fib %JgC3 rtr. �:� SCR r - rl ��' rill iniiir4,, UK=n Ift1St3,Cam ®©i i41= •'9 - _ dittISE®113/MIP115�a1ista i P � a era s- ,,. 3 I f , F 'DER ;tent ®® ` `3`' ri r.m . k t.®ma®� f k v •HTnC ND L ,his gyp® ® 1!��yp� 11 \' i 11 L- 1 181 11 .} M • // L4" A .- / I m� a �M1 i ''im I.IS� ®fu�® _mph®Wg6g1E®9 yti c•m i ®- a -. 1-' xn■ i ®s r ij may, _,_..+ �■. . YdY ,• 1■6.a. . pg •■mgw� � a1 • /.v •ion® i-i-ma 1FA, `-T}Dtnr iG Y� "n '1 =1, nn I 'O . - � am Ala , �®m.®o. ;`� ._- yam 1/4tia. �. #r =' °1_- n.__, ..mai Hawthorn e I -_ a ,t t.• #rte w 1 It n n 51rm 7T .�', V I r- k�g p '�"'��° Imo. 5 i..vbr I. ... r =fad � ,IM ~ o'oa D,�1�7-.��7 r�aP,,, i :&iH'm ®... '- - IT. mr I11 1 -LLn !�"^. $'P +��.Yk1.u+"^T 3..1k�LYK� "® ® .. lot- I �vI I I I I .; USGS Topo Ia w :ss{{r N LandVisionLite f .'1'090 Copyright O 2006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the protrietary property of the contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. • B & C- 62 http://maps.digitalmapcentral.com/production/LandVisionLite/v07r6p2/index.html 7/10/2007 Page 1 of 1 • r gut r^a a t"` ,.�.+,. a�.Y ,r s S r °' " r * '.. k c ti4:6 IRS-;v.• \ .- ktia r;3 4WA .NJs ' �'' '� you wr a z-�-4{ r te+ x u ..� • 5 err[4 t �]W' ..ry .�. ~ b - ^� Y' $ Y -r V't:),91:: ..'x .hk t >� aL e c�„ ,y .t1'?'" 4 �i t F V I ���' �.,�1+..i 'fl 4 :4,-' �t a ' ' y}�a° �'r gay 'µ Sh'n¢¢ 'i IAA L s t' R r l�r . t MiSS?;�dr, Fla ?t 7' �dy- £ m .a..w.., 2wv'� Q j i iii � vit - '7w<I . `t"'�.-vjt- g +'3t.,.`'.,F kv ���y" ,,, tiy-p.§,�w�,',, .,. Ak C 4' .I;,,` Y S1P" + �,-Is sz▪ " 4. -+,.' `"'cv`a,.."z '? a pEr'i r �(t 0 C fi"'S"v2' 1,qn , '5`5evrz a- ,�a .z r�+ F)&,.�1 .�,n lad, at, Ar - ¢' mot.' w "CZ; 1 F fi C i 7 r A out t .ix 3 1,k. ry v"T' ;?" q .,,, 17 rs T a `A'A* Rri n' a!,q giff;t�' `a�..c}>' 4' "! ,+ 's` r�rk E tV-i4 ss E e r C fy r 4 �' nerd si tt -t S µa.- ` 4- fi� ,s* a�"vs+ ti --�}�' i7 m '� - 1, c t tr' r% ry"•s2 acism. vv „4' '; ''°�/'-'� �' -t' kiy,�h{a .}tea ..-". c id.za ' a,-s is /F,:f.� = k d w Am.:.-=.45:11:.rt ''nA'a c�y� -�SI'�L* ,a t- ry : n3CT-13,44 '�yPx, .rte t F,, ,rrr,..s' 1G1 "'`'-a` r.rti �' _a a.`"" e F{ v s 14- '' �2 ' its+: sa,�7i 8th s ra4 ma v.� t▪ tt , -;-:- „y;.&a:.:;t`, .- .°ti. v L.v4b'O,`" 4,7, 1‘1,-..,�'�", ,5.,k.yi Tla� e I ' sY4 ."z1. I I '"t rt'9'b v.. .Fa rs. t r ��i4�� r�ieyfi'S 6rJ, "01: ':,iZF�,q�{a,"4a''t� h�� t q ¢tu. - - �"yy€w t.u -4• 3:r ..% ,:r? a,''a V sly. ° p�1 h{ '`5'`u 3 S I I zT"3y., . c,0: , t t tm, �'♦II Irtn yu .W : L r xf- ..v{ .h' asv 4'4 r i c <c,. t�,-c It w' ,Q`,1,, 0, .. *. '�,._ e' t2,4,`.> `' ' ,tarsi -I ,, ; _ by "IC,yi„_ .. �!� �0 y�a,1,...Fj 511 ,6 i-; APO I S-4.: 71, c.* t° . t r~ x`7✓ti ompg.• �I rhN.t®L.��t1�8�!E r{r�y� E I "`. C Cl ,rtT.F. _fi .,yi` f.. iVSi'Y wr wSLiP 'a -,u 'tea x ,�l} _ �"'YC���T.Y+L'HtM eae::cSY®C-pE1V n w{ r* i}' tY R pp x' 1 tug y lu�f 't'fk'F V ey _ -4-ttiih A ' r „� y� -- + t¢ k€oA .Pi�wfi y�`� �F t•'4& Y i�� I M Old El��,'� �. � bi"+, wy,''�yN M E,ty °Fte','i,V���, 3 L' .u- 9 � �tV e tH �`$.E 4y SC +35 i atd'�.. $ rss 1 ^}•r M▪ #I 'S V °3 +t+'' ,t '7'a! ® II ihAlr4 hSt\ 4, aNF 's csy0 Ax 21Rass yr tE^�tt �t 5 5` n"o"r 11 'S C ▪ �� i �I1 l ®� u \ 1{T..t'"'e�`t'`�,-p rc �+"`ji m`r,C-v� e°.. -: Cxr` m+, ��', .Et'te �FA d _ b xv WWW���FOi., '3. r- ,r S .ter Ui Sti':;_ lir ig„, t„„ .ter▪ r a I a, i }y �',} � ® ®® ® m""IN. ": a' ▪ ° tog,; r tar 32' icy d WISP v ®e g ., Z w `l `0- i a :wit,,,r- 'k \ sr=- i =St g»v e®�,® : 4u u Un1 t?,w r aw.... ;f Dt 7 -wq �, 3" ', d �rT'' Y-� a.wC:"�`35' � I _;' is p�x:s . I / -,, }� . + ®��5®®q®,, a -:,. gip: re L rP a , �.. r y' ,� Y�' a�® elel®'' t i +,h-+ * m Pot: E�eadar St q i R▪s l ee 14< W—_•K 2 i eV '�' Y4�� ,F'-c ��.,gg.i ®r v C �q Q l� 1 .'ice `0 Y )J � dp :.. I. 33,,. ^iq. ?SJ O M hF i 3 eel G �:t. ' N ie m '� -re,., a t aY ki o ttn, a 'a N ,L. 3 V �y �„ �e CillaI T° 1 '�T 1'i 2,..�OMie.P tut�a�s'� I �� I' ICI I C T .:.®O..ee�e®: r,'{3:n !T_ 1:\1nPn,C�= USGS Quadrant Sheet f 450k n �_{Fn N LandVisionLite Copyright O 2006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the contributor supplied under license and may nat be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. • B & C- 63 http://maps.digitalmapcentral.com/production/LandVisionLite/v07r6p2/index.html 7/10/2007 Page 1 of 1 RMJfI•u Kr�A I /`I F F, ° :YYI� t�� Y y , • i 1 - ��� Yt"71 I � y � • 'A J �, 'RLL; Y^ ,,P -0 I 7 try 4.. k..0 S , „' - 1 ni.� N i` ii Pk t Y —®I , .7 i 6' '1 d * >=�'Y - I �i� 1,',,,N it. i „' ' ... h #tr ..i.,".4•71-..--.1 - °; la"5 Ci�`.• iga.C t. '1{4. }}.--.. •-.•'Idj 3' 1, . Y ! �§y,t r I+. .II. � x V.: •J .s- a.'bi t'e71-4s,...r i tk ` Y` fl I1.�."I.1 ' iZ ,t-"r a-,...-+.'”-"1II,�, F `-: „'�-.•.a?„.„tar si -. - •+zS{ ..s ":-i f yn 1 ,T 3'� 7YZ''`Y-;'�}y +<!' °a.A:..-_� 1 tsnu # ° "° au tis. 'It.1 If?, '''...,1.121' 4 f'S-6 io[rcGa A (15�rr5�'quy.- al .;:� i F i w, I ,a, !e4 + 1 h.:1S . '.1 e''v ' _ ilyR.Y�•�a t1 ♦ . } a t �. l,'4 . 1 3 ° C � � 11 r1� 7r R ;47Z;''''...-.:::;'; I {u M1r . i y, \, k 5 r t,v Yip,. El 4 Wyk c a +Y d .1) , 4° • 4I— { r6 1,i,*e {r s-". .t _+.,,.4 ii ::"2,,,,:,;• 5i 1� L7:,-, k yET ri, ti1a , t„�4 �i l t 7 �' i.1.!..1,;„,',.• e a Iy J I uy 0 ;� #t 4._ t i� F} ( —1 ru mon G. ?? • '�=1. t 5.!:_i__:;::'�� ri›L� ° 1,„; i- )511na . v itiT`� . ,' A . r a a d' rc. >a ,, 4•tr�i?� i1 ' Y W It yjt ""o '- r 1 t t -1% Y y�,.. JI nd ' " yE-c [,,y in A'" Ct rl 1'st t 0 p°�it�. -r . ° I 11 jc,".7.11r :. t I-R . L�'ti . Li tat, ;S t"�K,e t „ r-{ - -'j`-j+'1,!� I ' pal, gL 7h1• f li t i s; M 011 ,- ,ry, y,,` !. �:,::_ra N19h IJ,AlFyi �' ,ei. 1 11, n, li:�, t'�` 4...f,.!-3 f, .:.:y..,..,:,....11,: : 1 1 = 11Z t ...',_,I.'..4. p1 kil1IL11 91a' �d q ir' e , e > I I 1 . 1 q -al 1 1 VFF d _ 1 �^h;g ."'Y �VI,'.+ y vt ,� , L_ I - TjQ 1� I er, a1 nr�" a rr ��"YR' ` K. s f �F x I� - �.• L. wr1E,- `{ I 1 Ya a f h 1� -y7 v,� x ia5. M Y : • PI Y ----I. U e 5t ..4031t,ii;., rl �rf"-Q�'n �l Sd w �.tlq 9 r h1 (. r] a airy z 6 n 1 (r - `. 8 1- .- J 1. xlf-_,I ,'S'4 J "\' t Y f a, . y✓F-7,-..'. . .,PEA �l•l� � �� 1 i Y ul t1L�.h .:In r } t r.+i�_ .t rnJee• ye'b`I +e 1 iF9 , I. m E } . ...., Ia 111' 1i0 4 t Irn. .. $ ii x Nnr '' I e. G}w 7" d ar(fl.� u 1 ¢6•”' �tx nthI.• ���p �l I �� 1-1 1 x9 ", r *i �i'{l1 115 1 1" f- 1".'"I 1 r�'y *` eef'A' : 1.I. J 11;a?' �I. is i '1 i 'r� !i r p s1r6 ,, a p1J21191 �t k r •iTY: r 00 , it, ;.i15 r,�1 \ . 3EI�1 Ir. yJ ,,`� .p-t...,r, f� irk i 4 � � � �; q{I , AA1-± E A,_„e_l dnrt �.t -g6a Ii',� -'.lhl�.itIla.''i'.,311r: c.--;,,,,,,..i ,. A 1+,11.it Jtr '', I'+Ia, a l:! -W-.51,_-_?, pr v1 �sG -1,14.7:t. 1 e t di I � I L 1 t ri'Yi• I v, 11.�'�:I t '� J ih f• .. k/ 1 A¢� t L h of h '4 , fin r 111 r_ F d`1{'r e -- kit iSII 1 I I :1eT 7rn:. 11 1�l 4 ' ( y '1'a 7,! § °a - Ia6i �Yatr i"dM 28F� � -:r rgl t. nn- `r- - # Jy,-114:T he 13 1 S i.e f .4 Or'1iF` I9 � I iFl 1 i 11 *' LT {\1 \ �� I � II ar`_ ,T1Mi`rs�s+;x'`j`.'`aa erecVA > 44-e1:. _i kr-Iw3r" but , `it. i t�f .: 1—i d A�.sinaP c es — 450ft USGS Photo NI LandVisionLite Y '�'o90 Copyright O 2006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. • B & C- 64 7/10/2007 http://maps.digitalmapcentral.com/production/LandV isionLite/v07r6p2/index.html , "� ; , _ . • . _,...off„. • City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM t 14 T INITIAL STUDY PART II W.Fid le BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Development Review DRC2007-00551 2. Related Files: Minor Exception DRC2008-00152 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC - A proposal to subdivide a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) into twelve (12) parcels in conjunction with the development of an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 12 buildings in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 3 located at the south side of 8th Street approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue - APN: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, and 0209-161-24. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Development Review DRC2007-00551 - A proposal to develop an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 12 buildings and 12 parcels on a triangular shaped property of approximately 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 3 located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street-APN: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, and 0209-161-24. • 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Terri Allen DCT Industrial Trust 23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 120 Newport Beach, CA 92660 5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres). The project site is triangular in shape that is approximately 1,100 feet (east to west) at its widest point along 8th Street and 260 feet (east to west) along 7th Street. It is approximately 1,650 feet (north to south): The site is vacant; vegetation is limited to low grasses and a small grouping of trees. The property is bound on the south and west by the Cucamonga flood control channel and beyond that there are single- family residences in the City of Upland. To the east are industrial office/warehouse buildings and an operations facility for Verizon. To the north is property owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the site for a proposed public works administration building and a household hazardous waste facility. To the southeast are additional residences. The zoning of the part of the property located between 7th and 8th Street is General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), while the zoning of the part of the property south of 7th Street is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north and east are General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 2) and General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), respectively. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. • 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department B & C- 65 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 and , . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • Page 2 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVW D—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR— Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR —Final Program Environmental Impact Report • NPDES —National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx— Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PM,0— Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB— Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP— Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G — Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED • The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x) Aesthetics (x) Agricultural Resources (x) Air Quality ( ) Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology& Soils ( ) Hazards &Waste Materials (x) Hydrology&Water Quality ( ) Land Use & Planning ( ) Mineral Resources (x) Noise () Population & Housing ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation (x)Transportation/Traffic () Utilities & Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION . )On the basis of this initial evaluation: (x) I find that although the proposedpf!ect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this rape because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponnt. r ITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIOJ wijI be prepared. Prepared By: Al -I Date: 65° 15 (19 Reviewed By: �_ Date: I T / • / Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 66 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 3 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With an Issues and Su pp ortin g Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant I mpact Incorporated i mp act Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: • a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? • Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. • b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street and is characterized by industrial development to the north and east, and residential development to the west, south, and southeast. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of street lights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would.the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) 'Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? • b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 4 • less Than Significant Less Potentially with man Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Signifiant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) () (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street and is characterized by industrial development to the north and east, and residential development to the west, south, and southeast. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to General Plan Table RC-2. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) • identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The site is located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street and is characterized by industrial development to the north and east, and residential development to the west, south, and southeast. There are no agricultural uses within one mile of the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air ' quality standard or contribute () (✓) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for • ozone precursors? Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C-68 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wm man PP 9 Significant corpotlae Significant oa • Impact Incorporated Impact Imaad d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) O ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the ability of the region to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Also, according to the Air Quality Study prepared by Associated Engineers in October 2009, the proposed project is not predicted to cause or exacerbate any violations of the proposed (National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) or State Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). A regional analysis has shown that the operational emissions of the project burden levels are below the daily operational significance thresholds. b) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the • pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. According to the Air Quality Study prepared by Associated Engineers in October 2009, during the construction phase of the project, the project is predicted to meet the daily construction regional significance thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the SCAQMD on a project-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit • construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 69 • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 6 • Less Than significant Less Patented)/ WThan Issues and Su pp ortin g Information Sources: Significant Mitigation sic No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil • during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM1g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans • include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. • Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 70 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Significant Imp act Incorporatea Impact Impact Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (No2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Lonq Term (Operational) Emissions - In the long-term, development consistent with the 'General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 12) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. • 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 17) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 19) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). • . c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 71 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 8 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor — residences to the west and southwest of the project site. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. 20) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 • and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. • e) Construction Odors (short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would be like cooking and gardening. Similarly common odors associated with mixed-use and commercial land uses would be expected (i.e. restaurants). Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( ) V) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (') or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? • Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 72 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Imp G c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? • • Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with industrial and residential uses. The perimeter of the site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding development. The interior of the site is relatively undisturbed. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. •c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife may potentially move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the sphere of influence. The City is required to acquire and/or protect open space areas that provide strategic wildlife corridors to vital habitat areas. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are several heritage trees on the project site. These trees will be removed for the construction of the project. To comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance, the application will be required to submit an application to remove the trees. As the applicant is already proposing to install a significant number of trees and landscaping as part of the • proposed project, no additional mitigations are required. f) Neither the City nor the sphere-of-influence are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State habitat conservation plan area. The project site is not located within a Rev. 8/23/2010 • B & C- 73 Initial Study for . City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 • Page 10 • Less Than Significant Less Polemony With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in • § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) O ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be • no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 74 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant I mpact Incorporated Impact Imoa d project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or • preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert . earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The • perimeter of the site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding development. The interior of the site is relatively undisturbed. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest • the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code • (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 75 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 12 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant t Impact Incorporated Impact Imoed regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) O ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault passes 1.25 mile northwest and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing M„, 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„,7.5 earthquakes is 12.5 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M,., 8.2 earthquakes, is 15 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. • b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area • Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 76 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 13 Less Than Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Patanliant With Than pp g Significant torpor to Significant No Impact Incorporates Impart Impact stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM1p emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM1p emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to • minimize PM1p emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for96.hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. • c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the sphere-of-influence for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam and Tujunga Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam and Tujunga Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. • Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 77 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 14 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) ($7) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (i) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 • • miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (') would the project result in a safety hazard for people • residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (') loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil. Additionally, through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and • handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 78 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 15 Lass Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wnn Than PP 9 Significant coiporiate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are expected. • b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. •The City participates in a countywide interagency'coalition that is considered a full-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There is a school, Bear Gulch Elementary at 8355 Bear Gulch Place, located • approximately 0.5-mile from the project site. The project will be required to comply with • existing State and Federal standards on the use and transport of hazardous materials. The proposed buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. No impact is anticipated. • f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. • h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 79 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 16 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Su pp ortin g Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) ( ) (✓) O • requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that • there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the • production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially-alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, • which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial • activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. . Rev. 8/23/2010 . B & C- 80 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wth Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an • NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). To comply with the NPDES, the construction • contractor of the project will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Associated Engineers in July 2007, which identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage • system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and • implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 81 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 18 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incargwaletl Impact Impact grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary. berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Associated Engineers in July 2007 to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Post- Construction Operational: 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality • Management Plan prepared by Associated Engineers in July 2007 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be approximately 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and • amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 82 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 19 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With an Issues and Su pp ortin g Information Sources: Si ic Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated I mpact Impact handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to . prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. • All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the.site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape • proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial • additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by • the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f). Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development or significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. • g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected. Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 83 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 20 • • Less Than • Significant Less Potentially wti Than Issues and SUpPorting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year.storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: • a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street and is characterized by industrial development to the north and east, and residential development to the west, south, and southeast. This project will be of similar design and size to the surrounding industrial development to the east. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is General Industrial: The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.10 of the General Plan • FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C-84 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 21 Lass Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Nth Than pp 9 Significant itigation Significant No • Impact t Impact Impact Impact because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 10. MINERAL.RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments:. a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. • 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: • a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. No adverse impacts expected. Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C-85 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 22 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: • Significant Mittgotion Slgnificant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be - conducted within an enclosed building; hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby commercial uses is expected. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified • in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measure shall then be required: 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is within 2 miles of a public airport. Located approximately 1.75 mile northerly of the Ontario Airport and is off-set • north of the flight path. The site is within the CNEL noise contour. However, the project is an industrial complex comprised of twelve (12) buildings that will be constructed of concrete tilt-up panels. The building materials used in the construction of the buildings will Rev. 8/23/2010 8 & C- 86 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT.REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 23 Less Than Significant Less PDIentially with man Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact sufficiently mitigate potential noise impacts. Also, the anticipated uses within each building include industrial manufacturing tenants. These tenants may generate noise within the building that will exceed the noise levels generated by overflying aircraft. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? • c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? • Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is industrial and therefore contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected. c) The project site is industrial and is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) • c) Schools? () () () (7) d) Parks? () () () (/) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 87 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 24 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact 'Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The site located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street would be served by a fire station, Fire Station #2 at 9612 San Bernardino Road, located approximately 1.25 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The • nearest park, Golden Oak Park at 9345 Golden Oak Road is located approximately 0.25 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) • require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 88 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 25 • Lass Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Golden Oak Park at 9345 Golden Oak Road is located approximately 0.25 mile from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? • b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ( ) ( ) • ( ) (✓) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) O ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) O (✓) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus • turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: a) The proposed project includes the development of twelve (12) industrial buildings. According to a Traffic Study prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. in July 2008, the project will generate 2,625 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. • The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at • intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway • Rev. 8/23/2010 • B & C-89 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 26 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) According to a Traffic Study prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. in July 2008, the project will generate 235 trips during the am peak hour and 247 trips during the pm peak hour. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 1.75 mile northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is off-set north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan • Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontages of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. .No impacts are anticipated. f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The design of the project includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). • Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 90 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp 9 Significant Incorporated Significant pa Impact Inwmoratetl Impact Impact 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected • demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for build-out of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to • handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 91 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 Page 28 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With is Significant coiporite SiImpct Impact Impact Incorporated mpeM pa d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the • • habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) V) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a . project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable-future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop • the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 92 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 and • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 Page 29 .effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan • Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. • EARLIER ANALYSES • Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive: (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (T) Air Quality Study (Associated Engineers, October 2009) (T) Traffic Study (LSA Associates, Inc., July 2008) • (T) Water Quality Management Plan (Associated Engineers, July 2007) Rev. 8/23/2010 B & C- 93 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 and • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 Page 30 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where dearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicants Signature: • Date: 9 .57 •Print Name and Title: ,' :'A� 0 S i cma-(' TOr recf' 'Y • • • • Rev. 8/23/2010 • B & C- 94 • • of City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC2007-00551 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 B & C- 95 • MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 DCT INDUSTRIAL TRUST • Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. • 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the • authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • B & C- 96 C ggry= 0 0 2 - U N L C �«�: m fh w ' • c E E C 0 O O V 7 V r (0 Z r a N N N N i d N r co —N 5A „r;: G) v C ,z �-. 0 i a/ Cy L }`. C O i a co c 0 R k , 5 O U cam: d Q, L F+a ) as . ` 0 0 0> U« S„ F- m c N M '0 u 0, 0, U) Cl) C C C C C J > a a a a a y o _e : a 0 10_ E ci •k, Z 0 E = C '> > > > >CD �' {LO N F > I CC Q 0 0 °' 0 C U J ” • *" C > 0 ms O 0 a "f O W H 2ii 0 0 0 m 0 - _ n • a a) y V R c A;: Q d . Z In 6. 'D0 it Q •- CC 0 > _ 'Vaal O 0 9 v o of 0 m h _ o o O O p .. yL �C ' O_ 0_ 0- CO CO Z N IC 0 0 R o 0 mom_ o c m • c �� V a 0 m 2 ix _ k> roaCN .0 r 0a0ro0o - 0ci `o c R « m m .� o a.. N• a... O ow X as ID. ro v . ro � � a) L ro US 0a �4 a)•5 § .- 0.-0 ro G O O O > 0 a) G Q 3 J > Q o O co C= .. m � °ca`TNro °c 0_ 0 — a) coo n a) p5 E >. o 3 3 m ° ro �° o ) m o R• a o0 ° E ¢ .o p o C~ C• ,L- ' L QJ CD o 0)= -0 c E ' o0 - W a 0 o m G G :! - O N a U 9 a6 >., ` L o o C E O L C p_ L a - c R "` TO C Ca U C p ° c p () U' CD ro a) N .0 C 0 1 \ ::t: 5 a o n C 5 = a) C co c•.P C O 0 scr a) a a) o c 'O O d = P a c t` N E O > O ° U N N O O 'Y (n O) c - d a) ; c Q > N do E > Oa EE - E sac ro m o Z o c E N 0 t 0 N _O o T y L = O E co 0 c y p "P4) o_ 8 E a) -2a c E a C > Jccat c ° a 2 t Q o m d �"-�S:S C E a o a1 j 0 0 0 a) O ro �• ° 'rop 0 Q 0 0 0 c cra.L O V ta < . o -at 9 N O y N 6_ -o ro op -o ro :_ 3 E2 CD 3 Z co i c c F- Cr N - - O as c L p_ c o ro O C ° • 0 d Of O p a) ro N was a) y L ro y as ° ro Q ° ro O N 2 c p c 0 e o ry c o ` .E O m o 0 0 y ¢ 0 LJ. = C C j O C C C• (9 O y 0 W •O• C -° E u9 i 0 0 ++ R 0 µms' N O) O L C C ` O a ro O O CA ° 0 a) , E ro ca L C d) V O 0 m c.. c ro 0a " o .- E c E E c o)._ •m E co o ac c a) d ca i % O ro y N C C V) - -Q5 -6 .0- 00-17) - 005c_ a o - 0 -O O a) • Q .2 0_ Q'' ° a) '- c 'c' .- c > c 5 ._ > O N N (-CO •C C 5) (4 Y1 U U 0.O 4 — a E o 0 o ro o- > cr — .CD ro .— — o 13. < — Q`i Q o o O E 2 O O_ -o a a) a) a) c 0 E d ¢ a 0_ s Q c Q 0= B & C- 97 N O y C O R if , c O v v v .4. ... , . . N N N N V d' d' V V V V N C r 'O C O - F o i r 0 a) > ❑ C G p a c O u C 0 2> a a a 0 cc a a a N C m ca m ro co c co C d a Cl d O. c0 c0 O O O O — — > > 2 3 rn v 3 3 3 3 3 m m o).. m 2 m 2' ro N N N N C . y C O y co C c C c > d O N d N N O p p C° O O O O N F > CC CC CC CC CC D o D o D U D O D o CC O) > C U -it C 0) • O ea 7 O ._ S• u U U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U N a) cc no N C C O O O.5 en a) O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC 143 m m m m m m m m m m m ` C ° a fi H C — ' C O ro-C - c c o o ill C N N o_ ° U d 6 aj C a) C e a T E m 2 L o., 7))2 ° o E . 00 '? t0 •w S . � a r ; urtiiti s E o 3 . o ° w ro 't E U cn - CD a3 3> C ro N = N e L p i n ( d ad 0)0 L .- -O 'O _ >,. o a> L CD UN `• C >, L L N•a) L N L N L 'O O• � t C L N 7 A O N ro > O O U al ca o O L C N C CD-3 v °) o ro' 0 -0 • Oro N > O. -O am N -oma > - C O a) O N E C U a O N 7 C E O ro a a) O ro i C > L C j N a p) N p > O O .co. LO ' O N a O m C d o E -6 N 'p a c N _ w 0 0).r._ J o C ro a)d c ro m ao2O > o a p 3 ° > a) o .- o 0 cu N .- as m N a a � 2 i U U "O Z O j O > N "6 �- °O U N O j j p O O C ro N= ca N N N 'O O .. ` U O C• Q .N (171 O CO O) V O C al OW om O c > > L ea O . 0ro � N co a cro x ° SEoUd N .no U CO 0 3 5 me m °'.O . m • c a' p U x -0 o a 07 +60 d T� ca O N E N To— > d> . 3y� =� c N O c o 1111111 N N w10111 • . o 2 L . • • . H o B & C- 98 a) . 0 L c O 9 in a • O• O :% U U C C d V ch M c0 c7 V U) Z c� N d' V N V co V N N In To • 'O C O C isE a) i r m as > O C O C V U O r t,_ 2 > a a 0 Q 0 a 0 Q 0 0 co cn to co co CI) cn co co co co cd co co co co do no do cd c a a a a a a n E. a a O 0 'r-; O o O o O O O o O O 13).0_ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 _ ;p m O > 0 0 0 O 0 0 .> > U £ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iz > ¢ Q ¢ m m Q m m m m • O) _Co U a O 7 O 2 u_ 0 Q Q W Q • Q Q U U U O) O 5 it p N a• ° 0 a to a) p W 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 ¢ ° m 0 a • a. m a_ m m - a. a. - Y rt v o o p — a) >+ O) a a) C O 0 a) O a _0 o a L O 0 > i° �? C C m U as � L' m 0I ro CO c c 0 0 m D o y Y (� .0- = C � w m .c 0-0 O ca j N > o a m N m 0 c E y p L to y C a1 p N = T tN4 E N 00 �- a E O 'EO a ai ai O C O N y 0 O) C - O O) a m E N O is ••0 o) .E d ai a E E a 'E r a a) a O o -p c°i E 0 m m m o m i6 O a E m a�° m p O 'c _c E a C vi ro Q O co -p �• m Y a t4 L N = O` 0)0 m m N N N O)▪ 0 0 p 7 o o .j y 0 .Y m = O • y m m 3 ° o o a m 0 c .� >, ro a c c E .3 0 n - a o -0 am- O o a- J 0w ? c -c m 0 0 �O N v) GI = ro 2 'co N J o cJi 3 °J ° 3 E i. - C CC m- N > 0•> - > 3 '- E O 00 � E ca ° `a o- ro C C C N O 21-75 y - N - C a - o a C .co p O .0 C .L 0 N. ° � cE po � cc ° roam ÷2"--a � mac c � oc 3 = o > Epp Z O a{ O_ o c O c0 o O J J ,-- 0 L Y L O a) (-I E • N = U p_ J a:J Q 5 a ar a to o ° U N E E N a) 3 d c N E N (N/) E .� _ o E - ._ £ o ano d 0 o � d ° e `a) ac .J`-• o o E c y s ro ° w o 0 g oL m W Q oc > J 0 o ro wa pY w _ -0 0 a N j ro m U a N N Y III l6'_. a O Oi a d a y N a ci i1 C ,- m U a) 0 a) ro U N a) 0 d J = G a• U N C3 N = •- C "o 0 N .� a .0 a. y a) C ro ro ro 0 0 E1 m 2 0 : OuI! 0 , 0 -c a � m 'o oap m m .c ai - m m °0 O N m - h -p v) a. o 6 a- > con o o J co a a. m Q E N m—. N C y E C - E 0 2 3 h O.2 O N O J cø J O J O - CO 0 cn U O -- a) a • • • • • • a '�. a s a p _ W m U . .0 '3 O C 0 C 0 ✓ a ) O 0 O c0 O a C =O _ 0 '- - a) _ O 0 � g. Hoo dam > o Q a Q oa QED B & C- 99 a) gii-A.,, C3 C Les, 0 O• 0 i.:.-1 cc 0 a . a CC c 0 Cr) cr cn Co co co co Z CV CO It-77 ph. cn ra 73 c ri4 cp ...... E a) .• I0 Vs > 13 WS r: C •4- o c.e... -0 riz o 9 < 0 0 0 0 a)• lal 5 > 0 -05 Sq -c t t C 0 co o 0 o o c c OA a a a a - al as a) 2 2 2 c a "E). .r.... tr. :If 13 "5 t 45 ' "i- ' "5 _ . arta 3 3 3 3 co 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 ->- c -- o a> Oa _ '5 _ E tr, CI) '5 a) '-7 , 0 a) W> 0 IP CC cc cC it PV, 01 >, pi Co 00 1 2 a 5 4,. o ;12 to g--leoci 0 0 • 0 0 0) .ra o .0 1r_ 3 0 Fa = k OC;C-1 CC 0 0 0 0 00 CO (a o M 6 LM 6 ° s9 0 CO 0 co 0 a. . a_ a. o_ 14. :to 3 L° o- 0 .g F 0 C a) -o c 0 2 `74 a) -a a) < 0 0 .- -0 o .6 •-• a) ct• a: 'cla 3 ..( ;.c.. a) p La 0 •- I-LI C CO Rata t; t . 70 ft.5 .0 Cr (a 0 in o E 0 c ia c Larz.., wo 0 a. 2 c u, E 0o E a) _ 0 0 -C njfiC.ka Cn a - •-• Cn 4- a -5 2-(7) 0 - = oc' ECcnca) v 2TC> caeca 3 cm o rc '- '- E , ""-' a > 0 cm -0E0 o 3 .--cz co 2 a) c •C u, -c-- W 0WoiE - cn ai ., 4 ocDoomc c 0 a> 0 0 0 c> ,- La 0 s_ 715 0 D 0 co cr -o o 0 o 0 0 0 Wi,-. cp a.) 0 '- E _, "E. .- w 0 -a to .. ■- c o c ..c ?...-- a) as cv 1.•-, = 0 . 0 .--• o_ as - > 0 c _ .7,4 .,., .- co co o c >, c .,,, RE -- ca co a) c 0- COO- c 3 a) = g la ' gOit a ii ca 0 a) o — 9 ;, 3 a) a) — m 0 "0 "El 92 °) --:2-:A 3 e) ° 0 a> ' '6 :€• 0 c7) - o a ,-- c t tiO ocEas 0 ■- c •- coo co cocoa) a o i_ > o a CD CD 2 CC 0 0) •-• - 4- 2 ;it • ao a) -..C. a- o) 0 •ILD .- a c ....• ,_ 6 ta-,..•) 5) cz o E o Ti) r o .5 0 E -c .- E .- 0 7 0 :Zt" E 0 cn ._ Ca -4.41 0 .0 -0 0 8_ 0 ... or_C - .,?". ,... .5 ..c_ --, 2 f.,ta.46, -5 0)in a, -- (&' -5 .5 a) 2 8 •- o ..... - a) c ,,, 08t _cooN - > 0 ,! 8 cio •Ea.; _52E • 0., (cs > ow z E _ 2 a) - ,p Or CD ,- DA''' m1 -0 ° -0 ° c0 -42 7 W ca . C 04= 0 .- c w p 0 1p,,,',, WI la = > a) ° — -- co---- -- '5 2 ■- •- ,-- in c E To "' ., .- 5 E2 a) ol . .-- 5 -E., c,_-c„. :---• 0 -= al a .._ a ...- a = . 0 0 , ena a 0 MEC 0 ,,,,,, .<.) 0 ,_ e a 0 E E 0 > ca 0__ _ o _ 0 _ ca ca •,.7., a, ),.., 0 cro o o 0 u) to'2 _ , •-,a):, = " o a, o c,_ cry cc) 0 To = cz 1,7-. cp = 0 3 c .1. 0 •._ -L• rico o o a) 2 E -0 0 0 c — 0 -0 0 •-- 75 ■_ ° < 2 ' -co En <tcc" caat■-& — v --C. •- ° '-- o c 0 a> '0.) E c = a) ,- .- cn 0 ...c-2 0--0 E ;,:) :E- .0 ..-• C ....- 112 E Cg tr 4,1 E tr _, o 0 0 o c - 0 M ° — (j. 0 0 3 >,3 1:3 0 0- --70)1. a) -0 RITS 0 .p -- •c 2 -0- co a 0 rp c°) 0 0 C 0 ..ip as u) ,_ > — 0 -o 0 o t-oa.. ,c3_ o = ..-. _ o) — — a) -0 (2 0 o 0 a) 0 .4.7. Cn 173 C C ..= a tr: a) a CC a ,,,c —0 Ojia. 'c r) c r - 2 r) c?) CO .ci EL. 0 E ° 0_70 c-) 0 D> o a) InEr.0) „," -0Ecn0 - - > ,r•-__--.4 -.• m wn, -,wo ar -a co > ,._ -F, oc ,„ 72 := E = 0 - w (:) :..- -o 8 0 001 >, = - .it L ,a) c -- :•-• 2 ooa) c cc. - 0 ,-...-. 7 C 0 -0 'tit X a) 0 .2 05 LIR 0 "0 4P5x, C = C := 0 .al LLF(3.)- §- a) 0 c p -...c, 0_ as a_ 0 a) a. o) 1:11— c 2 " ° c = I- a) c‘.1 -0 3 !!"1 (13 8 76 w n F. ra :. 0 E. a) _ 2 rn a 5 2 '3' 0 49.00 c -,T) 0 ° • c •TC E o r ;-:( co E 3 o_ o c 2,„02.: = a) ,._ co L as . . • • .....z,., B & C-100 a) 0 " 5 o R • o o z c R O V Z M C V -a- an M C) co Ts . '0 c 0 a) N i R r • c O O V C O 0 L 2 > °a a a °a C 0 • " r t r C C O 0 0 0 0 0 a a a a a a C o E 0 E E E O O :. o o O O O o L ' N N cp N N N H > cc cc a cc Q: cc 0) T • c c - c • • O CO • O o a U LO n L.L. U in m m 0 0 0) a) c a `o c c c - O O a5 y 0 0 a 0 O o[ ° m a a m a a a t .0 ^- o 0 0 c o o a a) a N 6 o a 0 0 o CO O O O Fa C D) O N O O O) ro a 0 ca = N m .> > `a :N N N N 3 o-50 E CV c E Ng a:_. E 0 ' 0 •= a) � 5 ro o "a N c c ¢ mU•� oYmoo Om ° r000E d2: 0 coo .? o) roaO —--- - aco E a 0 0 CO Y m m 0 0 D a m o E E O) N L N N O (C4 01 N a= t o Q E `_o N C) d a a r > ro N >, N t6 ro > - N C a= to N - J C c a `O to W e 0 n E a r n D o m a c c0 a `oa) � ° L o ' > -0 co - 0 — Ua _ UNm E wom8 aa, aiaac°� 2 -cccgo oE05 2 -- -0 0 0 -- 0 EEai 0 � m• an `oS0cj) owroaac � E ° c EEi8 CL .cc E ca m eCa EcO .0 c o Ct _ o) o E3 RS 1 . ro E - 0 _ E > rotn O > O O O N N Y N 'p errs O U N-UO N 3 0 C ) L J s 7 d U p CO c >. o `° Nom = ro ° w N °)m O1c a) a cc cc N � o N `n d 0 Z E c0 - o '- D OE oo ° � o .Coo � tEy o � t as co y c ro O O U C C - N o C U C U 0 > O O YO c ro a 5 a 00 - -C Oo c`tlioroNwrrooES 03J > o -o aUa >;� CI d � •- c roc . c5a) 0aco0 • Ed oo � ,_ - Ec = c05 EH Na 0coom0 oo .-;; ,=. D °1 Croce m ccc Eo8 0 E 0 a3 N iq ' O U d m E J ° ° -- N a- 3 - 0c 8 O ' N J ro L • E E E m E N '8 o = U o o d• aJ N o CD CO mca _ o CC ca20Eai > ro roaUO a °) ? Cog c Ec c c UflU E 3 o a a � E Cam , flW ,_ c > flfl o c ro ro a E N R o n E O a roc a U O J d 0) O) y C N U J o0 No2 � NVJOa3 ¢ a� EJa co oa m ° dOO � U rnd d -0 aro or: .2- ro T_ EL) N o o. my > c0ma) 0a0o 5E . _ 00o ca ado a U a N N E ro B & C-101 0 F a 0. % �w IL �• C v R O °: fn Z ha V V d' V A N F,7 k7V4 Fnv ve tt{ a \ o l sn„ O00 .i. va, tl 0 m p U x . L = _ • g , U n• > Q Q Q Q r?' a of 41 c r to c I C C C C p_ p 5,.. o O d O - $ 15 —i c 2 �0 ' m2 aE o) E ++ 11;C w C y C c C C y y C { E - C 0 0C 0 I- > 0 0 0 0 a c O O)a 0 C � co p d m 2 LL 0 0 0 0 Ol sin, - y02 ' C i . C C 4x' 2 $ m m m m w O °— c c c O m ~ .- T a) °N c U L d 0 ° Va. [6 N L C N s c 0 c ° N d af O ° O s ca y r ° 38L '` v = = . Qo t > 22 "Ea oa o E 2 m', ° c ) m ,)v d 2 ° ad m - "co U� 6 ° �Q) a° oo a -0-8 n VicL ' L ama2O °E cm 0-0 3 N t4 Kf ° N °L N a O _ - N C Es 0 > E a d d a y c 2 o C L d N 9 :., d� a � ° 75 " r a oa > c mQ' p f o er` as ; L m T _ ° mr'� oo 0, o * ai: 2 Oct V O u) L N L L 0 V r,- 51 : c a Z ,, . •7 co N a > a c ° a1 C Q as C d as _ d a 0 a C ` a 0 ? co c c 0 m dO d T E o N A o } z p) > C d 0 -1• d d d C ` L E o C C in m l a) c N N( o ' 2 2 o = d 7 r g , O1 ` ¢ a m N '5 E ° ° N c ca m N •0, ma '>• ei. ° r ° 0 V O ! E r ` g .2 C... ° U m d T❑ N ` ' 2 O d d E▪— T -p L y C .- d d ° L 0 C a) . N C2 C ,cro N c o c ° N E to 0. U d O N , an o E o m ° ° °) .N ° Q m a c F c d N g Oi� ° E ) X.ci) •-t m a) d ° d NO _c a NoDd O L � ro -0a U oo ._ a E k ro0 '° U O moJ o a io C E Q nv Yd 9 8 — �, E dl N cdtn ' > - a = ro L d p co, L ° > N O U E r- d a ° L > 2 6 c d ° L2 E F ° CC 3 2 ti. 0 d ` T 0 m w U Q co o o °+ B & C-102 C) U y C O 2 • C c O O E. U O za a a a a N a3 'O C . a) t 0 . 0 m > 0 C O L i0 O U 5 > a a 0 0 0 C C cf) co en ca C O.O. C C . co- a) a) a) as O. O. C a O O O O -a 70 O C .= N a) N o a) E 1:a) Cl) 0 0 a) 0 • . F > Q Q CC II C O) >. C 0 • ° 3 • ❑ o f U ❑U ❑U 0 ❑U` Q N- 5 u_ Co w m m m • C) • ,. a) ..c n yo y t C C O O O.m . in • L cc .2 m m m 0 m • m m or-0- ° 0 E ro c 0 c a ° ai c -c o c c Y "O co 0 E C . O) a) 0 _ U = E > 0 a a) N ._• a a) E -O 0 0 "00 a 0 = N c 3 N N O o L a c v) co "O N 0 2 0 = N O 2 C m a)-6 ,E 0 a1 N N U `a 0 a 0 CO c N -5 >. c fa O C 0- o 'O .` "- tc O..0 O N c 0 O L .N.. > C 0 O_ 0. N 0 O- a to .- 0 0 -O ° 0 a) N `o E t o ,O > N 0 �, E :0 E a) c :°_ N a) >. 'O.c o C C L. — = c° L O..� N 'O .J N O N a ° 'ttl N °" 0 o) m O 0 - z -o —O 0 U o= N ° N 7 a) O $ _ c 2 2 8 2 N 2 o CD m-0 7 a) a� a0i N E °- 3 E 0 o.TA ° E mn. o f and o f ac a`aiEo � v) .EwcOim � o �� ° > ° cc°� a5i = co °> = co `o a s E ° ° c c 0 c o N C E t 0 `o_ N ° o a 0 o — _ E L_ Ltca' ° ca 00 o c E 'c ° cENL - cEN n E o c o c d c CO. E E E E 2 -0 0 E o)t 0) 2 E c)t° z cE0_- 5a moao) m a 0 m ° Y0 ...: ° E2 € o- ctcmro °- roc � o _ E O N Inc ` 0 0 -o Eco .Ero00 o ° -o E ` a) Ems ` ° c . 0 0 d N ,Cf) N a> O` C 2 o 'O t9 E 0 0 ° 2 2 N ° — T 0 C c 0 T 0 N 3 0 O C — E N c E N 0 c a) O L U N — .0 a 3 N L = c .0 0 L = C C °- W a c n3 c 0 .0 O ro C a N 012 2 O) L 2 0 m a ? 'O)U a) V) > -6).0 C • 0 O) O d 0 ._ U O 0 c C ° O ;` y '00 O m - o L 0 Q c 2 0 Q C U �> C U OI... y N O f0 -O O 0 d y d C O C . y 0 a LJJ in 0 W 2 d C '� a ° ` 30N o C C O C O .5 .N N N o N ° 'O N 0000_ ° 'p z o 0 p E 0 0 0 N E O W 'O N O N a-o C a) o) o)- CA 0 > (6 �a U X > t° [a C rn d o � c � - ul N � o � a ° o ff o a = - c E a) '°'o - .o o f -OO � o 0 E t - C a) o d ' u) N N ._c>1- 0 L L S N ' 7 N ° N L o y 'O 0 L a) y o co c 5 = Q ° 8_ (7) m FL- E m E Q .E .� ° �3 ❑ w `o St) ❑ t `m n F— :F- Q -° ° f— ° Q i° E B & C-103 r�:�:�:yyy���""" F d J O c E Fes' • 0 0 e 0 1 n v pre,Z v ..r. to 5 t ; a c °�-' � - a, y : • > o y. C i. o °– ea. a ;r O 0 s ` 0 y. U U M > a W._417 < acalt'co co C C c c a a a '4:-. 0 0 .7. 0 O ; cn E 'd .� as >a) .= o F > m . m s--�--. a U O) >. = 0 r...._, i = ;ce_ Q) O 2 0 0 0 U m' u m m m a?V co Vfil ar _ t O 0 ,,j.t: 0 G w 0 .,..1 I O O ro «O O ro •- 0) = '- U W O C 'O W T a) T C N N C 41 – ':*_,I .LO.. v1 at cu — L W C _c cc N ° G N ca c .0 E - m ca a) a) O N "� 0 W En W o � _ E 5 c a m c '"�; C -o com � `c° Um c � amc ° j � Q en - (7 4:-, _,... � a05 oW alT� 2a) croiromd � E5 = °o • Eom � � rcLi co _�.°,7;. 3a' a o i— o a a_ 5 a) o.E _c50 0.O c � m � � o0 o c (A d al O-N o 00 1 C ca j ? E W X N W N 0)Z 0 1c t0 0 - Z a. ., ca 0 C a3 ro O ro W O o W 0 ca -C -c E 0 C rod _C N v; O c 0 ..� W a) a N �' d C c6 t E > Ti Od - N N Z Z 0 0 ro -0 L- - al E a) 7 c ro a) g� W = CO d cC al C c a) d .c v .. c N a) s yf E °° � o N `o co D E k 2 ` a) 2 a) m ° `o E .E 00 a) a 0 i __ 00 �. c .N • O 'c W r a) 20 W N O c 'W 0 m O a) D W a) a ... L C C" C _ _ .E � a) ccO O � O d N 5- co cc C W CO c o c a.a W .` o _ ' m ro o r � c=l mEL a � � c o) o E N � E E ro ..= mot/) 8 � o N .2 . .y N -° 6 Z co E d C Es 0l cn a .–° o) N - -O N d N ro 0 0) plc ca 0 a.--. o c, .; 0) CS UI C N .0 N c ` D c d a) T� _ _ c6 0 > 0 0 d ;_ c 0 2 0 co E E a -a ro m -0 W c c 7 W d V=) ac U o E m m m 0 La 0 ■... 9:.: -O E a 3u _m -oaa)) -0073 , o `o a. a) � � c � aroio_r c°1i � 000Ero � ° E o) °'� tau 0) dro.° N C a CNa) C F. "ca ca . f6NN roOO)W 0) oa.•Z 'Ca d '��' ° 8 '% 2 c 0) N C Q W p C co a W co= L C 0 o _ . c ._ c Siw' c ro .- • co C Q m d o '00 ° C m o ma o J E W o m O h a•• W , 0 _o Q 0 `i.+ o 0)L c m rooms - Ft ro E ro o m 7 a o � � ° = 0a) _o ,0 o 7,. r4 2 ° c a is 2 w o Q) cp 0 E E $ E a.d-y V .. aa)) " 0 O ro 0 C = C ,a)!: a., =0 c 0.2 E ccd E W C L C d a O 0 = W m N p o a) .° d W O a) -O O ';"O> ° O co to .J ° S) W E d aWO -o ac dro30Umo mU ;.a. oc . c B & C-104 m E L C o O _ m m a • E c a c C O O N '- U o a co _c� .. ° °c C v o m fa `m Vz v i i c ° o 2 _ a) i d o{- ai l O 7 a N F c 2 0 U id C„ g p '° o ❑' O O O O Y O� _ _ («- uc, §- . � y Q CI' U 01 (CI> O °m , '30 n co a in CO r ti O � � ; y a, Ls 5• 5 > Q / :M;s J `i Ca CO • O r a ° yc' a a v C C C ,O-�'_ - O o o .,;mg 'E m • R 5 t ,_), 0 `m .E • C y C N .d.: n p Y p co It O o p 0 cw' c m ao a) �'�' o C r m c U4 C L a a - 00E- co ' Na._ C CD O O O C NSamoa �7, CD O E (3) ....0.F U 0 c 1 to rT a c 01 no. o 0 O C - I)Cj m c 8 a 0 ;N., m o E o :'a 0s rii C C .y 3 E o C O O 0 L, a) h O o u. Z c mW O- � z U o n . co N O fiC? a o s E °2 C m a ,,e O. L F- o o O o m• . C O C a T-c T c 7 N N -0 N N y ro o O — T � W ` L C a t= 3aI- Oo c co p'. :.. Q N m U ❑ W a N 'J ro ro T -0 0 O) N — , NUJ >` i O N T N N N 05 O y .'s tEoa) 5c—E > 3 -0 0 . c X aiE0 . o N N a o > o m CO A N c C O C o :: a) N U d U J O C > C 0 -0 'c O C _ N C J J N 0 W U o. N 16 T- N L •.{ a C O U m E X O 0 o - y LhhihO ! ilI Hj!i1! j 2 C To . O I ( T d C . ❑y > N o OL E C ro O d N yc 0 a>E C a) 0 O = C N ON O C . 0 U 'O O � 'O o O c C/ � td ro .0 d > #` E m m . m Z C t C O m o O N as C � 4 s c 0 e-f a of m- L.. O E N co C C C m J C C o t ` ` 5' 2 O N -o E N NC . . o o m D N r O 0 7 i S LSA TRAFFIC STUDY • DATED JULY 23, 2008 WILL BE PROVIDED TO YOU UPON REQUEST. • B & C-106 t° 9 r4 • y City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 and Development Review DRC2007-00551 Public Review Period Closes: October 13, 2010 Project Name: Project Applicant: Terri Allen, DCT Industrial Trust Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 3, at the south side of 8th Street approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue - APN: 0209 151-27, 0209-151-37, and 0209-161-24. Project Description: A proposal to subdivide a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) into twelve (12) parcels and a proposal to develop an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 12 buildings in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 3. • FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • October 13, 2010 B & C-107 RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 A PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP AN INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE COMPLEX COMPRISED OF 12 BUILDINGS AND 13 PARCELS ON A TRIANGULAR-SHAPED PROPERTY OF APPROXIMATELY 904,000 SQUARE FEET (20.7 ACRES) IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3), LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 640 FEET WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET AND THE SOUTH AND NORTH SIDES OF 7TH STREET; MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, AND 0209-161-24. A. Recitals. 1. DCT 8th and Vineyard, LLC filed an application for the issuance of Development Review DRC2007-00551, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of October 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on October 13, 2010, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to three (3) parcels with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres); and b. The project site is triangular in shape that is approximately 1,100 feet(east to west) at its widest point along 8th Street and 260 feet (east to west) along 7th Street. It is approximately 1,650 feet measured north to south. The majority of the project site is located between 7th and 8th Streets. The remainder, about 38,952 square feet (0.89 acre) in area, is located on the south side of 7th Street; and c. The site is.vacant; vegetation is limited to low grasses and a small grouping of trees; and • d. The property is bound on the south and west by the Cucamonga flood control channel and beyond there are single-family residences in the City of Ontario. To the east are industrial office/warehouse buildings and an operations facility for Verizon. To the north is property • B & C-108 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • Page 2 owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is the site for a proposed public works administration building and a household hazardous waste facility (Related file: Development Review DRC2009-00882); and e. The zoning of the part of the property located between 7th and 8th Street is General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), while the zoning of the part of the property south of 711" Street is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north and east are General Industrial (GI) District(Subarea 2), and General Industrial(GI) District(Subarea 3), respectively. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District; and f. The applicant proposes to construct twelve (12) office/warehouse buildings,with a • combined floor area of approximately 389,600 square feet; and g. The application contemplates warehouse tenants. As defined in Development Code Section 17.30.030, "light" and "medium" warehouse uses are permitted in this development district. Other potential uses that are permitted, subject to the availability of parking on-site, include "custom" and "light" manufacturing; and • h. The applicant is required to provide 419 parking stalls. They have provided 434 parking stalls; and i. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16794; and • j. A review and request for approval of land uses are not included in this application. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: • a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed project is an industrial office/warehouse complex consisting of twelve (12) office/warehouse buildings. The underlying General Plan designation is General industrial. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land use to the north and east and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the properties to the north and east are General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 2) and General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), respectively. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District; c. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code except the number of stalls for truck trailer parking/storage; the applicant has submitted a request for a Minor Exception (Related file: DRC2008-00152). The proposed development otherwise meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. The proposal does • not contemplate any review and action for land use entitlements. B & C-109 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the • • Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction of twelve (12) office/warehouse buildings, with a combined floor area of 389,600 square feet in the General Industrial (GI) District(Subarea 3), located about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and • north sides of 7th Street - APN: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, and 0209-161-24. • B & C-110 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • Page 4 2) Proposed land uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit as identified in Table 17.30.030 of the Development Code, shall require a separate review and approval by the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check, issuance of a Business License, and building occupancy. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) Easements for the purpose of shared access, use, and maintenance of the parking lot areas, driveways, and drive aisles shall be provided. Documents for these easements shall be submitted for review by the City and the easement recorded with the County of San Bernardino (and other agencies/entities as may be required) prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. 5) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 6) The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order • to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. The maximum height of light standards, including the base, measured from the finished surface is 25 feet. • 7) New walls, including retaining walls, shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone, or have a decorative - finish such as stucco. 8) All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a similarly dark color. 9) Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. 10) The Landscape Plan shall comply with Ordinance No. 823 adopted by the City Council on December 2, 2010. All landscaping shall be installed prior to final acceptance of the buildings and/or project site complete and release for occupancy. 11) All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices, etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment • shall be painted forest green. • 12) All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be screened behind a 4-foot high • B & C-111 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 5 block wall. These walls shall have a decorative finish to match the building. 13) The employee lunch area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. 14) Incorporate undulating berms along the street frontages (where applicable), within the landscape setback and landscape areas. The highest part of the berms should be at least 3 feet in height. • 15) All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 16) Provide durable street furniture in outdoor employee eating area, such as tables, chairs, waste receptacles. 17) All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. 18) The applicant shall submit a final draft (incorporating any applicable • technical corrections to the text, format, etc.) of the Uniform Sign Program (related file: DRC2008-00681) for the City's records prior to issuance of building permits. All signs shall be in conformance with the Uniform Sign Program and require review and approval of a separate Sign Permit application by the Planning Director prior to installation. 19) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 shall apply. Engineering Department 1) Eighth Street is a City"Local Industrial" street. Construct 8th Street as follows: a) Remove and reconstruct 8th Street to the current City standards, including full width widening across the project frontage. Provide curb and gutter, 5800 Lumen HPSV street lights and asphalt, with sidewalk, street trees, and commercial drive approaches on the south side only. Provide traffic striping and signage, as required, including R26 "No Parking" signs. b) The north curb line shall align with the north curb of the existing Cucamonga Creek Bridge. Install 8-inch asphalt berm curb on the south side between bridge and west project drive approach, 16 feet south of the bridge centerline. East of the west drive approach provide additional widening to accommodate the 44- • foot width and ultimate centerline alignment shall occur on the south side. c) Extend the 4-inch edge line striping, 11 feet south of the centerline from the bridge to the west driveway. 8 & C-112 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • Page 6 d) Street improvement plans shall include the ultimate alignment for 8th Street from Hellman Avenue to the Cucamonga Creek Bridge. East of the project boundary the centerline should parallel the Metrolink tracks, 83 feet to the south. Reverse curves connecting the two end points shall have a minimum radius of 850 feet. e) Install pavement transitions east of the project frontage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2) Remove existing "half" knuckle at west end of 7th Street and reconstruct as a full cul-de-sac per City Standard No. 112, off-set south in accordance with "Industrial Local Street"standards, including but not limited to, the following: a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, street trees, commercial drive • approaches, curbside drain outlets, and asphalt pavement. b) Provide and/or relocate 5800 Lumen HPSV street lights, per City Street Lighting Standard. c) Provide traffic striping and signage, as required, including R26 "No Parking" signs. d) Reconstruct catch basin and storm drain facilities per drainage report requirements and to accommodate cul-de-sac • reconstruction per City Standard No. 112. e) Install a trail gate, per City Standard, at the west end of the cul- de-sac to access the future regional trail. f) Transition from property line adjacent to curb adjacent sidewalk on the south side of 7th Street, between the east property line and street light, to keep sidewalk within the existing right-of-way. 3) Provide a final drainage report addressing the following: a) Calculate Q100 for 8th Street and 7th Street with fully developed tributary area and propose flood protection measures, including heights of floodwalls and driveway elevations to contain Q100 within the right-of-way. Also, determine the depth of flow for Q25 within top-of-curb and 10-foot dry lane in Q10. b) Demonstrate that proposed flood protection measures on 8th Street will not adversely impact the downstream properties, on 8th or Hellman Avenue. c) Determine whether the existing lateral and catch basin in the 7th Street cul-de-sac can accommodate Q100 from a fully developed tributary area expanded to include the project site, or if additional local storm drains are necessary. 4) Install drainage facilities, including curbs and/or flood walls, off-site on • 8th Street as determined by the drainage report. B & C-113 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 7 5) Extend the private storm drain system as far on-site as needed to contain 7th Street Q25 within tops of curbs, Q100 within rights-of-way and provide a 10-foot dry lane in Q10. The site drainage shall be subject to the approval of the Building Official. If possible, storm drain laterals shall not cross the MWD pipeline. 6) Proposed drive approaches on 8th Street and 7th Street shall be a minimum 35 feet (50 fee maximum)wide measured at right-of-way per City Standard No. 101, Type C. Beyond right-of-way, driveways can be reduced to a width acceptable to the Fire District and/or Building Official. 7) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of 8th Street shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of project frontage on 8th Street from the prolongation of the east property line to the centerline of Cucamonga Creek Channel. 8) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to one foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. • 9) Driveways south of 8th Street shall be no steeper than 6 percent for first 6 feet south of the public street right-of-way (back of sidewalk). 10) Vertical and horizontal sight line to comply with city standard for proposed new westerly driveway and 8th Street looking westerly over the channel bridge for east bound traffic. This is required because of the height of the existing bridge. 11) If driveways off 7th and 8th Streets are gated, those entrances shall be signed and gates shall be set back minimum 80 feet from curb and gutter. 12) All streets to be posted "No Parking." 13) Metropolitan Water District(MWD) easement on the final map shall be • approved by MWD. Include all existing and proposed monumentation, calculations, and closures. 14) An MWD Permit will be required for any work within their easement. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring the MWD Operations Maintenance Branch to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. • 15) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right-of-way. Sidewalks shall cross drive approaches at the zero curb face. Provide additional public right-of-way as needed. B & C-114 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • Page 8 16) Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans". If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District • (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if • silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. B & C-115 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 9 • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM1o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. • 10) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 12) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 13) ' Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 17) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. • 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. • B & C-116 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • Page 10 19) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 20) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Cultural Resources • 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of • archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the areas archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting • the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow • the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. B & C-117 • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 11 • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum), • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with • vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a • minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or B & C-118 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • Page 12 . off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street. cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. • 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Associated Engineers in July 2007 to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Associated Engineers in July 2007 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped • areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to • ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. • 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan • (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. • • B & C-119 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 13 Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the • construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2010. PLANNING.COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 2010, by the following vote-to-wit: • B & C-120 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-42 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • Page 14 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • B & C-121 rat COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT wf4SW: DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2007-00551 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: DOT 8TH AND VINEYARD, LLC 640 FEET WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET AND THE LOCATION: SOUTH AND NORTH SIDES OF 7TH STREET—APN: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, 0209-161-24 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: it Completion Date General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its /_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 10-42, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The /_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 2,060.25 X B. Time Limits 1. Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved /_/_ • use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. • SC-12-08 1 ' I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00551StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-122 Project No. DRC2007-00551 Completion Date C. Site Development • • 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include —/—/ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions —/—/- of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and —/—/- State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be —/—/- submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for —/—/- consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all /—/- other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved —/—/- by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building • permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so ' as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be —/_/- located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, /—/_ including proper illumination. 10. Eight-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall —/—/- condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. D. Industrial Complex 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. —/ / 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and / /_ debris remain for more than 24 hours. 3. Signs shall be conveniently posted for no overnight parking" and for"employee parking only." —/—/— 2 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00551StdCond 10-13.doc • B & C-123 • Project No. DRC2007-00551 Completion Date • Building Design --- 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / / projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally,designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. . 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles,entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. • 4. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more / /_ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 5. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more / /_ parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. G. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/_ residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 2. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for _/_/_ commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. 3. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other /_/_ . non-residential development. • 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00551StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-124 • Project No. DRC2007-00551 Completion Date 4. For industrial projects with at least 40 car parking spaces, bicyclist-changing facilities shall be /_l_ provided to encourage bicycle commuting per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Bicycle • Transportation Plan adopted by City Council Resolution No. 02-237. Accessible restrooms with storage lockers for clothing and equipment shall be sufficient. • 5. Shower facilities accessible to both men and women shall be provided per Municipal Code _/_/_ Section 17.30.070.A. for persons walking or bicycling to work for each project which meets the following thresholds: Commercial: 250,000 square feet Industrial: 325,000 square feet • Office: 125,000 square feet Hotels and Motels: 250 rooms • H. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in /_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees—24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one / /_ • tree per 30 linear feet of building. I. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. /_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Director review and _/_/_ • approval prior to issuance of building permits. • J. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of$557 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. • K. Other Agencies • 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for 4 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00551StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-125 • — Project No. DRC2007-00551 Completion Date mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the • overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) L. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/_/— a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(DRC2007-00551)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. • 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. . 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to _/ /_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/_/— 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the /_/_ Building and Safety Department. M. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number(DRC2007-00551). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes,ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or _/_/_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. • . 5 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00551StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-126 Project No. DRC2007-00551 Completion Date 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map / /_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. — • 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday /_/ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public /_/_ counter). N. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. / /_ 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC. / /_ 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A / /_ 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. / /_ O. Grading SEE ATTACHED APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Dedication and Vehicular Access • 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from _/_/_ street centerline): 33 total feet on 8th Street _/ /_ 33 total feet on 7th Street _/ /_ 2. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by _/_/_ deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. 3. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint _/_/_ maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 4. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the /_/_ final map. 6 • • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00551StdCond 10-13.doc • B & C-127 _ Project No. DRC2007-00551 Completion Date diStreet Improvements 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source / /_ of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including,'but not limited to: _/_/_ Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other 8th Street X X X X X X (e) (f) 7th Street X X X X X X (e,f) (9) • Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) Traffic Striping and Signage (f) R26s No Parking" Signs (g) Curbside Drain Outlets. • 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights _/_/_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a /_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / /_ project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer • • 7 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00551StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-128 Project No. DRC2007-00551 Completion Date Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets,a maximum of 200 • • feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be /_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan /_/_ check. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / /_ accordance with the City's street tree program. • 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed /_/_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field • conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. . Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. 7th Street Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8' 30'O.C. 15 Gal P.A. 8'or more P.A. less than 8' Pyrus betulaefolia Dancer Flowering Pear 3' 20'O.C. 15 Gal "Paradise" 8th Street Brachyhiton acerifolius Australian Flame Tree 5' 30'O.C. 15 Gal Under Utilities Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybrid- 3' 20' O.C. 24"Box "Natchwez" White Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with /_/_ adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 8 S I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00551StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-129 1 . Project No. DRC2007-00551 . Completion Date • Public Maintenance Areas --- 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. S. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/_/_ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the /_/_ property from adjacent areas. T. - Improvement Completion 1. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, /_/_ an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: All public improvements. U. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_l_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility • Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. • --- 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the /_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. • V. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way: _/_/_ Metropolitan Water District. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all /_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. • 9 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt1DRC2007-00551StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-130 Project No. DRC2007-00551 Completion Date 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall /_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if • at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to • Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: W. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,with /_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. • 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. —/_/— X. Security Hardware 1. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, _/_/_ or alarmed. • Y. Windows • — • 1. Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. _/_/ 2. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede /_/_ entry to burglars. • Z. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ visibility. AA. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and /_/_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941-1488. / /_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 10 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00551StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-131 44 •; City of Rancho Cucamonga ' :""fi Building & Safety Department :' 10500 Civic Center Dr. • ve, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ;=R:%a - T: (909)477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 GRADING COMMITTEE • PROJECT REPORT& RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: DRC2007-00551 Type: Industrial Subdivision Location: West of Vineyard, South of 8th Street, North of 7th Street . Planning Department: MICHAEL SMITH APN: Meeting Date: June 15, 2010 By: Matthew Addington Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: No: xxx If NO, see COMMENTS below in Section "B PRELIMINARY: GRC: June 15, 2010 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: PC Meeting: �%G `. 13. 2 v t a By: MA Note: Building and Safety - Grading will review and comment on future submittals for this project. A. STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning • Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. • 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will • 1:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc 1 of 7 8--&-C-132 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. 7),..er, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 • • generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a,California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign(s) on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and • approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a • natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) & shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc 2 of 7 B &'C=133..... ...... _ .. a City of Rancho Cucamonga • ,1 : Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 �e T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 15. Private sewer, water and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 16. Private streets for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 17. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5%. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 18. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 19. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100- feet beyond project boundary. 20. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. • 21. Provide documentation for C.V.W.D sewer offset program to the Building and Safety Official for review prior to issuance of a grading permit. 22. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 23. Grading Inspections: a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre- grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1) The bottom of the over-excavation • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, • 20100615.doc 3 of 7 B--&--E-134 _ ._ . . _ City of Rancho Cucamonga fit, Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. RittRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 n * T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • 2) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; 3) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; 4) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person • and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. B. COMMENTS -The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: • 1. See Section E —Additional Department Comments. C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Should underground injection wells be proposed as a water quality management plan best management practice, the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit. 2. An HCOC exists for the downstream receiving water. The downstream receiving water (Mill Creek, Prado Area) is experiencing significant degradation of its banks. The project must implement a volume-based treatment control BMP (retention/detention facility) on each lot. The Storm Water Quality Management Plan and the grading plan must contain an appropriate volume based BMP prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 4. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc 4 of 7 B & C-135 • ��/ City of Raricho Cucamonga " 407 Building & Safety Department 210500 Civic Center Dr. ' 1 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • Mt T: (909)477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 5. Metropolitan Water District (MWD) shall approve all plans that impact their easement, including utilities, storm drain, slopes, and street trees and landscaping prior to issuance of a grading permit. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring Metropolitan Water District Operations Maintenance Branch to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 6. A permit shall be obtained from Metropolitan Water District for any work within their right- of-way, including grading prior to issuance of a grading permit. a. The applicant shall obtain written comments from MWD regarding site design restrictions within their easement and provide a copy of said comments to the Building and Safety Official for review. 7. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls • along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 8. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 9. Maintenance of the storm water quality BMP's identified in the water quality management plan shall be addressed in the project CC&R's. 10. Roof water shall not discharge over the public right of way. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide from the Cucamonga • Valley Water District one of the following: 1) An approved set of sewer relocation plans; or 2) A letter noting that the relocation of the sewer line is acceptable and a grading permit may be issued. 12. Grading of Parcel 13 shall be shown on the rough grading plan and or the precise grading plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. • I:\BUILDING\'ERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc 5of7 - -- -- . . B-&-=C=136 . _ • r . City of Rancho Cucamonga , Building & Safety Department ilit 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • 712110 pii T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 13. Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy a Property Owners Association shall be formed and be responsible for the ongoing maintenance of all Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Best Management Practices (BMP's) devices. D. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Associated Engineers (Parsons Brinkerhoff) , dated February 12, 2009 , is deemed "Substantially Complete". The following comments are required to be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit: Section Page Comments r ,•a : I xw, 3 - �r Cover Cover Sign and seal the WQMP Introduction A-4 Please check Category 7 for the Cucamonga Creek Valley Reach. 2.1 A-6 Item 4. Please check. Bacteria Indicators should also be included as an expected /potential pollutant. 2.1 A-5 Include the Cucamonga Creek Valley Reach. 3.2 A-19 The WWQMP references inlets with trash guards. This should be noted in the matrix. 4.1.1 A-22 Include infiltration basin(s) in the table. • 6.1 A-24 Use the City of Rancho Cucamonga's'Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan available at the Building and Safety front counter. Please add the project legal description Attachment A-28 Remove these pages. The City does not use this attachment. A-2 through A-32 Exhibit B Please locate the site on the vicinity map. Please darken the page; it is too light to read. WQMP C-6 The WQMP text requires a Stormceptor prior to the infiltration BMP. Exhibit Please coordinate the text and the exhibit. E. ADDITONAL DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 1. Planning - Provide detail sections at the center drive aisle drawn across the curb at the drive aisle and through each building that shows the proposed landscape area between the buildings and the sidewalk. Address whether slopes, retaining walls, and/or deepened footings are proposed. 2. Planning - Revise the Grading Plan to match the revised Site Plan so that it incorporates the corrections/comments described in the Design Review Committee report including corrected setbacks, landscaping, parcel lines, etc. • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc 6of7 B & C 137 • r City of Rancho Cucamonga St ;t .'u, Building & Safety Department . 10500 Civic Center Dr. • ,;��� Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 igth 23; T: (909)477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 3. Planning - Provide a detail section along the east property line of (proposed) Parcel 12. 4. , Planning — Provide a profile of the west driveway and drive aisle. The maximum allowed gradient in the parking stalls is 5%. The contours on the grading plan show about an 8% drive aisle and parking stall cross slope. 5. Planning — Show additional Finished Surface (FS) elevations between the walkways and . the building entrances. 6. Planning —At the southeast corner of Building A-2 and the entrance to Building E, provide a cross section at the building entrance. Provide additional Finished Surface (FS) elevations between the walkways and the building entrances. • • 7. Planning — Provide a section at the entrances to Buildings C and D (and other building entrances as necessary) showing adequate accessibility is provided to meet the current adopted California Building Code. 8. Planning — The southeast corner of Building B is not consistent with the landscaping plan. Please provide additional Finished Surface (FS) elevations between the walkways and the building entrances. 9. Planning and Engineering — Show the Trail Gate entrance to the Regional Trail per the Engineering Department requirements and the proposed conditions of approval previously provided by the Engineering Department. • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc 7 of 7 B & 138 . Moy: Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District irk: Fire Construction Services FIRE STANDARD CONDITIONS July 24, 2008 Phelan Development East of Demens Channel between 7th & 8`h SUBTPM18794 & DRC2007-00551 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us/fire/index.htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. • FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. • 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. • d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. • B & C-139 • FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is based on the • size and construction type of the building in accordance to the 2007 CA Fire Code; were the fire flow buffer of 10% required by RCFPD Standard 5-10 (formerly 9-8) can not be met by the two larger buildings, consideration will be made by the fire district to enforce only the fire flow required by the code. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until public fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. • FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans: FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems • Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the2007 California Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require. an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The 2007 California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard, Ordinance FD46 and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system fire may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures ls` story exterior wall shall be located within 150- feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed • obstructions. • B & C-140 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: • a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. • h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: • a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. • e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20.00. 3 B & C-141 f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and • a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan • illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 6. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. • b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building • construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field 4 B & C-142 inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Aerosol Products Magnesium Working • Application of Flammable Finishes Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards Open Burning • Battery Systems Organic Coating • Candles and open flames in public assemblies Ovens • Cellulose Nitrate Powder Coating • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Cryogenics Pyrotechnical Special Effects • Dry Cleaning Plants Radioactive Materials • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids Rubbish Handling Operations • Fruit Ripening Plants Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) Tire Storage •• Liquefied Petroleum Gases Welding and Cutting Operations • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings , Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials — Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. • • 5 B & C-143 FSC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of • equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2007California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD46 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted, The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1. RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. . The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost • recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant — Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District •for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions • PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction. plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. • 6 • B & C-144 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, • witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. • 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. "'PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. • 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. • 7 B & C-145 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of • the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. • The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. • 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8 ''/z' x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • 8 B & C-146 • RESOLUTION NO. 10-43 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794, A PROPOSAL TO SUBDIVIDE A PROPERTY COMPRISED OF THREE (3) PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 904,000 SQUARE FEET(20.7 ACRES) INTO THIRTEEN (13) PARCELS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE COMPLEX COMPRISED OF 12 BUILDINGS IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT, (SUBAREA 3), LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 640 FEET WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET AND THE SOUTH AND NORTH SIDES OF 7TH STREET AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, AND 0209-161-24. A. Recitals. 1. DCT 8th and Vineyard, LLC filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of October 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. • • 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on October 13, 2010, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to three (3) parcels with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres); and b. The project site is triangular-shaped and is approximately 1,100 feet(east to west) at its widest point along 8th Street and 260 feet (east to west) along 7th Street. It is approximately 1,650 feet measured north to south. The majority of the project site is located between 7th and 8th Streets. The remainder, about 38,952 square feet (0.89 acre) in area, is located on the south side of 7th Street; and c. The site is vacant; vegetation is limited to low grasses and a small grouping of trees; and • d. The property is bound on the south and west by the Cucamonga flood control channel and beyond that there are single-family residences in the City of Ontario. To the east are • B & C-147 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-43 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • Page 2 industrial office/warehouse buildings and an operations facility for Verizon. To the north is property owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is the site for a proposed public works administration building and a household hazardous waste facility (related file: Development Review DRC2009-00882); and e. The zoning of the part of the property located between 7th and 8th Street is General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), while the zoning of the part of the property south of 7th Street is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north and east are General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 2), and General Industrial (GI) District(Subarea 3), respectively. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District; and f. The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into thirteen (13)parcels ranging • in area between 3.92 acres (Parcel 4) to 0.50 acre (Parcels 11 and 12); g. Each parcel will comply with the required minimum parcel size of 0.50 acre for projects in this development district; and h. With the exception of Parcel 13, all parcels are contiguous and will be fully developed with buildings and associated improvements; and i. Parcel 13 will be located on the south side of 7th Street and will not be developed; and • j. This application is in conjunction with Development Review DRC2007-00551. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed tentative parcel map is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed parcel map is in conjunction with an industrial office/warehouse complex consisting of twelve (12) office/warehouse buildings. The underlying General Plan designation is General industrial. b. The proposed tentative parcel map,together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land use to the north and east, and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the properties to the north and east are General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 2) and General Industrial (GI) District(Subarea 3), respectively. The zoning of the properties to the southeast is Low-Medium (LM) Residential District. c. The proposed tentative parcel map complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed tentative parcel map meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. • 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for B & C-148 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-43 • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 3 the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the tentative parcel map will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. • c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet (20.7 acres) into thirteen (13) parcels in the General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 3), located approximately 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street-APN: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, and 0209-161-24. • 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. B & C-149 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-43 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • Page 4 3) Easements for the purpose of shared access, use, and maintenance of the.parking lot areas, driveways, and drive aisles shall be provided. Documents for these easements shall be submitted for review by the City and the easement recorded with the County of San Bernardino (and other agencies/entities as may be required) prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. 4) All Conditions of Approval for Development Review DRC2007-00551 shall apply. Engineering Department 1) Eighth Street is a City"Local Industrial" street. Construct 8th Street as follows: a) Remove and reconstruct 8th Street to the current City standards, including full width widening across the project frontage. Provide curb and gutter, 5800 Lumen HPSV street lights and asphalt, with sidewalk, street trees, and commercial drive approaches on the south side only. Provide traffic striping and signage, as required, including R26 "No Parking" signs. b) The north curb line shall align with the north curb of the existing Cucamonga Creek Bridge. Install 8-inch asphalt berm curb on • the south side between bridge and west project drive approach, 16 feet south of the bridge centerline. East of the west drive approach provide additional widening to accommodate the 44- foot width and ultimate centerline alignment shall occur on the south side. c) Extend the 4-inch edge line striping, 11 feet south of the centerline from the bridge to the west driveway. d) Street improvement plans shall include the ultimate alignment for 8th Street from Hellman Avenue to the Cucamonga Creek Bridge. East of the project boundary the centerline should parallel the Metrolink tracks, 83 feet to the south. Reverse curves connecting the two end points shall have a minimum radius of 850 feet. e) Install pavement transitions east of the project frontage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2) Remove existing "half" knuckle at west end of 7th Street and reconstruct as a full cul-de-sac per City Standard No. 112, off-set south in accordance with "Industrial Local Street"standards, including but not limited to, the following: • a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, street trees, commercial drive approaches, curbside drain outlets, and asphalt pavement. • b) Provide and/or relocate 5800 Lumen HPSV street lights, per City Street Lighting Standard. B & C-150 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-43 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 5 • c) Provide traffic striping and signage, as required, including R26 "No Parking" signs. d) Reconstruct catch basin and storm drain facilities per drainage report requirements and to accommodate cul-de-sac reconstruction per City Standard No. 112. e) Install a trail gate, per City Standard, at the west end of the cul- de-sac to access the future regional trail. f) Transition from property line adjacent to curb adjacent sidewalk on the south side of 7th Street, between the east property line and street light, to keep sidewalk within the existing right-of-way. 3) Provide a final drainage report addressing the following: a) Calculate Q100 for 8th Street and 7th Street with fully developed tributary area and propose flood protection measures, including heights of floodwalls and driveway elevations to contain Q100 within the right-of-way. Also, determine the depth of flow for Q25 within top-of-curb and 10-foot dry lane in Q10. • b) Demonstrate that proposed flood protection measures on • 8th Street will not adversely impact the downstream properties, on 8th or Hellman Avenue. c) Determine whether the existing lateral and catch basin in the 7th Street cul-de-sac can accommodate Q100 from a fully developed tributary area expanded to include the project site, or if additional local storm drains are necessary. 4) Install drainage facilities, including curbs and/or flood walls, off-site on 8th Street as determined by the drainage report. 5) Extend the private storm drain system as far on-site as needed to contain 7th Street Q25 within tops of curbs, 0100 within rights-of-way • and provide a 10-foot dry lane in Q10. The site drainage shall be subject to the approval of the Building Official. If possible, storm drain laterals shall not cross the MWD pipeline. 6) Proposed drive approaches on 8th Street and 7th Street shall be a minimum 35 feet(50 fee maximum)wide measured at right-of-way per City Standard No. 101, Type C. Beyond right-of-way, driveways can be reduced to a width acceptable to the Fire District and/or Building Official. 7) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the • opposite side of 8th Street shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit • amount times the length of project frontage on 8th Street from the • • B & C-151 • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-43 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • Page 6 prolongation of the east property line to the centerline of Cucamonga Creek Channel. 8) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to one foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 9) Driveways south of 8th Street shall be no steeper than 6 percent for first 6 feet south of the public street right-of-way (back of sidewalk). 10) Vertical and horizontal sight line to comply with city standard for proposed new westerly driveway and 8th Street looking westerly over the channel bridge for east bound traffic. This is required because of the height of the existing bridge. 11) If driveways off 7th and 8th Streets are gated, those entrances shall be signed and gates shall be set back minimum 80 feet from curb and gutter. 12) All streets to be posted "No Parking." 13) Metropolitan Water District(MWD) easement on the final map shall be approved by MWD. Include all existing and proposed monumentation, calculations, and closures. • 14) An MWD Permit will be required for any work within their easement. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring the MWD Operations Maintenance Branch to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 15) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right-of-way. Sidewalks shall cross drive approaches at the zero curb face. Provide additional public right-of-way as needed. 16) Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans". If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. • ' 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and B & C-152 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-43 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 7 projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. • 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to • • erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for • 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. B & C-153 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-43 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • • Page 8 • 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 12) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that • trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 17) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 19) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 20) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to • monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: B & C-154 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-43 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 9 • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the areas archaeological heritage: • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. • • Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent • (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. • B & C-155 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-43 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • Page 10 2) Frontage public streets shall: be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Associated Engineers in July 2007 to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Associated Engineers in July B & C-156 r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-43 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC • October 13, 2010 Page 11 • 2007 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and • Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall • obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. • 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used B & C-157 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-43 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC October 13, 2010 • Page 12 for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2010. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and • adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 2010, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: • NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS • B & C-158 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4., DEPARTMENT alias STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTPM18794 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: DCT 8TH & VINEYARD, LLC 640 FEET WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET AND THE LOCATION: SOUTH AND NORTH SIDES OF 7TH STREET—APN: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, 0209-161-24 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date • General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of . 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 10-43, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 2,060.25 X • • SC-12-08 1 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18794StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-159 Project No. SUBTPM18797 • Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a / /_ • complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include —/ /- site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions /—/- of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and /—/- State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for /—/- consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. — • 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all _/—/ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, /—/_ including proper illumination. 9. Eight-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall —/_/- condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property • owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. D. Industrial Complex • 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. • —/ / 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and / /— • debris remain for more than 24 hours. 3. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking" and for"employee parking only." —/_/— 2 • • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18794StdCond 10-13.doc • B & C-160 Project No. SU5TPM18797 • Completion Date • Building Design • -- • 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / / • projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18' inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall /_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. • 4. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more /_/_ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 5. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. G. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily / /_ residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 2. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for / /_ commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. 3. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other /_/_ non-residential development. S 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18794StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-161 • Project No. SUBTPM18797 Completion Date 4. For industrial projects with at least 40 car parking spaces, bicyclist-changing facilities shall be _/_/_ provided to encourage bicycle commuting per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Bicycle • Transportation Plan adopted by City Council Resolution No. 02-237. Accessible restrooms with storage lockers for clothing and equipment shall be sufficient. 5. Shower facilities accessible to both men and women shall be provided per Municipal Code _/_/_ Section 17.30.070.A. for persons walking or bicycling to work for each project which meets the following thresholds: Commercial: 250,000 square feet Industrial: 325,000 square feet • Office: 125,000 square feet Hotels and Motels: 250 rooms H. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in , / /_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within /_/_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees -24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one / /_ • tree per 30 linear feet of building. I. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. _/_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. J. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of /_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of$557 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit: K. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location /_/_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. • 4 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18794StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-162 Project No. SUBTPM18797 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, OCOMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) L. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/_/_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; • d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(SUBTPM18794)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. • 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. • 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/_/— 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the /_/_ Building and Safety Department. M. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number(SUBTPM18794). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes,ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or / /_ major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. • 5 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18794StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-163 • _ Project No. SUBTPM18797 Completion Date 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday —/—/- through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public —/—/—• counter). N. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances —/—/- considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC. / / 3. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table,5-A —/—/- 4. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. / / O. Grading See Attached APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from / / street centerline): • 33 total feet on 8th Street —/ /— 33 total feet on 7th Street —/ / 2. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by /—/_ deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. 3. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint —/—/- maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 4. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the —/—/- final map. • 6 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18794StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-164 Project No. SUBTPM18797 — Completion Date Street Improvements --- 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source / / of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been • completed and accepted by the City Council, except:that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: _/_/_ Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other • 8th Street X X X X X X (e) • (f) 7th Street X X X X X X (e,f) (9) Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) Traffic Striping and Signage (f) R26s "No Parking" Signs (g) Curbside Drain Outlets. • 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights /_/_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / /_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/_/_ project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer • 7 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18794StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-165 • _ Project No. SUBTPM18797 Completion Date Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets,a maximum of 200 • feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. • 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan _/_/_ check. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in /_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed _/_/_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field • conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. 7th Street Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8' 30'O.C. 15 Gal P.A. 8'or more P.A. less than 8' Pyrus betulaefolia Dancer Flowering Pear 3' 20'O.C. 15 Gal "Paradise" 8th Street Brachyhiton acerifolius Australian Flame Tree 5' 30'O.C. 15 Gal Under Utilities Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybrid- 3' 20'O.C. 24"Box "Natchwez" White Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil • amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject'to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. B.• I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18794StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-166 Project No. SUBTPM18797 Completion Date 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/ /_ • adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. R. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting /_/_ Districts shall•be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. S. Drainage and Flood Control • • 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map /_/_ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the /_/_ property from adjacent areas. T. Improvement Completion 1. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, _/_/_ an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: All public improvements. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas, _/_/_ . electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / /_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required'prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. V. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way: / /_ Metropolitan Water District. , • 9 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18794StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-167 Project No. SU6TPM18797 Completion Date 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all /_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation;prior to final map approval or prior to building • permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • W. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. /_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,with /_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. —/—/— X. Security Hardware 1. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. / /_ • Y. Windows 1. Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. _/—/- 2. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede _/ /_ entry to burglars. Z. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ visibility. AA. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and /_/_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. • 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. _/_/_ 10 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18794StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-168 Project No. SUBTPM18797 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION �NNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING NDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • 11 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18794StdCond 10-13.doc B & C-169 -r : City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 ft Building & Safety Department . 10500 Civic Center Dr. • c,A• Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 t T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 GRADING COMMITTEE PROJECT REPORT & RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: DRC2007-00551 Type: Industrial Subdivision Location: West of Vineyard, South of 8th Street, North of 7th Street Planning Department: MICHAEL SMITH APN: Meeting Date: June 15, 2010 By: Matthew Addington Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: No: xxx If NO, see COMMENTS below in Section "B": • PRELIMINARY: GRC: June 15, 2010 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: PC Meeting: L%G-r-, 1 3/ 14 ,2 0-t a By: k Note: Building and Safety — Grading will review and comment on future submittals for this project. A. STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning • Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage . plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc 1 of 7 -- .. B 8 C-170 - City of Rancho Cucamonga ov , Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 • generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign(s) on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage • acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a • natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) & shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11, It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14, All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent • private property. • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\oRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc 2 of 7 -171 .. _ ._. __._. . ... - .. .. City of Rancho Cucamonga �. 9e,. .. Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • '�i 4 T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 15. Private sewer, water and storm'drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 16. Private streets for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 17. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5%. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 18. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 19: The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100- feet beyond project boundary. 20. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. • 21. Provide documentation for C.V.W.D sewer offset program to the Building and Safety Official for review prior to issuance of a grading permit. 22. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 23. Grading Inspections: . a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall . request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre- . • grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1) The bottom of the over-excavation • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc 3 of 7 9—&—C---172 . . . _ . .. .. -., City of Rancho Cucamonga • • r Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga; CA 91730 •fi4 T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • • 2) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; 3) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; 4) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. B. COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: • 1. See Section E—Additional Department Comments. C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Should underground injection wells be proposed as a water quality management plan best management practice, the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit. 2. An HCOC exists for the downstream receiving water. The downstream receiving water (Mill Creek, Prado Area) is experiencing significant degradation of its banks. The project must implement a volume-based treatment control BMP (retention/detention facility) on each lot. The Storm Water Quality Management Plan and the grading plan must contain an appropriate volume based BMP prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 4. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc 4of7 • • 173 • 04-r,_. City of Rancho Cucamonga , ' Building & Safety Department is 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 urfl T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 5. Metropolitan Water District (MWD) shall approve all plans that impact their easement, including utilities, storm drain, slopes, and street trees and landscaping prior to issuance of a grading permit. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring Metropolitan Water District Operations Maintenance Branch to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 6. A permit shall be obtained from Metropolitan Water District for any work within their right- of-way, including grading prior to issuance of a grading permit. a. The applicant shall obtain written comments from MWD regarding site design restrictions within their easement and provide a copy of said comments to the Building and Safety Official for review. . 7. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls • along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 8. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 9. Maintenance of the storm water quality BMP's identified in the water quality management plan shall be addressed in the project CC&R's. 10. Roof water shall not discharge over the public right of way. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide from the Cucamonga Valley Water District one of the following: 1) An approved set of sewer relocation plans; or 2) A letter noting that the relocation of the sewer line is acceptable and a grading permit may be issued. 12. Grading of Parcel 13 shall be shown on the rough grading plan and or the precise grading plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551'SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc 5 of 7 ..... . i3&-t1174 . - • City of Rancho Cucamonga .•�' Building & Safety Department IS10500 Civic Center Dr. p, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 • 13. Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy a Property Owners Association shall be formed and be responsible for the ongoing maintenance of all Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Best Management Practices (BMP's) devices. D. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Associated Engineers (Parsons Brinkerhoff) , dated February 12, 2009 , is deemed "Substantially Complete". The following comments are required to be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit: ,Section Page:' "_ , a „zi4ykComments : `L _ - . ,c _ ..e . m .-...� S-o`vli' Y"ni',T,+_ cu,.t_'7', ii •"'Sr'd v., 1--. i t:. Cover Cover Sign and seal the WQMP Introduction A-4 Please check Category 7 for the Cucamonga Creek Valley Reach. 2.1 A-6 Item 4. Please check. Bacteria Indicators should also be included as an expected /potential pollutant. 2.1 A-5 Include the Cucamonga Creek Valley Reach. 3.2 A-19 The WWQMP references inlets with trash guards. This should be noted in the matrix. 4.1.1 A-22 Include infiltration basin(s) in the table. 6.1 A-24 Use the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement • for Storm Water Quality Management Plan available at the Building and Safety front counter. Please add the project legal description Attachment A-28 Remove these pages. The City does not use this attachment. A-2 through A-32 Exhibit B Please locate the site on the vicinity map. Please darken the page; it is too light to read. WQMP C-6 The WQMP text requires a Stormceptor prior to the infiltration BMP. Exhibit Please coordinate the text and the exhibit. E. ADDITONAL DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 1. Planning - Provide detail sections at the center drive aisle drawn across the curb at the drive aisle and through each building that shows the proposed landscape area between the buildings and the sidewalk. Address whether slopes, retaining walls, and/or deepened footings are proposed. 2. Planning - Revise the Grading Plan to match the revised Site Plan so that it incorporates the corrections/comments described in the Design Review Committee report including corrected setbacks, landscaping, parcel lines, etc. • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc 6 of 7 13 & C-175 City of Rancho Cucamonga ' , ' Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 0 , "11,1411,1 a T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 3. Planning - Provide a detail section along the east property line of (proposed) Parcel 12. 4. Planning — Provide a profile of the west driveway and drive aisle. The maximum allowed gradient in the parking stalls is 5%. The contours on the grading plan show about an 8% drive aisle and parking stall cross slope. 5. Planning — Show additional Finished Surface (FS) elevations between the walkways and the building entrances. 6. Planning —At the southeast corner of Building A-2 and the entrance to Building E, provide a cross section at the building entrance. Provide additional Finished Surface (FS) elevations between the walkways and the building entrances. 7. Planning — Provide a section at the entrances to Buildings C and D (and other building • entrances as necessary) showing adequate accessibility is provided to meet the current adopted California Building Code. 8. Planning —The southeast corner of Building B is not consistent with the landscaping plan. Please provide additional Finished Surface (FS) elevations between the walkways and the building entrances. 9. Planning and Engineering — Show the Trail Gate entrance to the Regional Trail per the Engineering Department requirements and the proposed conditions of approval previously provided by the Engineering Department. • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc 7 of 7 . 8_&--C-176 • • �aQMoy Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District w nr, Fire Construction Services • FIRE STANDARD CONDITIONS July 24, 2008 Phelan Development East of Demens Channel between 7th & 8th SUBTPM18794 & DRC2007-00551 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonqa.ca.us/fire/index.htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 01. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant • measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. • d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. B & C-177 • FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is based on the • size and construction type of the building in accordance to the 2007 CA Fire Code; were the fire flow buffer of 10% required by RCFPD Standard 5-10 (formerly 9-8) can not be met by the two larger buildings, consideration will be made by the fire district to enforce only the fire flow required by the . code. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until public fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems • Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the2007 California Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The 2007 California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard, Ordinance FD46 and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system fire may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1S' story exterior wall shall be located within 150- feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed • obstructions. • 2 • • B & C-178 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: • a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 1.2%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: • a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. • e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20.00. 3 B & C-179 • f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and • a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be . installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 6. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. • b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. • e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building • construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field 4 B & C-180 • inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce Sonditions that may be hazardous to life or property. Aerosol Products Magnesium Working • Application of Flammable Finishes Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards Open Burning • Battery Systems Organic Coating • Candles and open flames in public assemblies Ovens • Cellulose Nitrate Powder Coating • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Cryogenics Pyrotechnical Special Effects • Dry Cleaning Plants Radioactive Materials • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids Rubbish Handling Operations • Fruit Ripening Plants Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) Tire Storage •• Liquefied Petroleum Gases Welding and Cutting Operations • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials — Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are tote used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. • • 5 B & C-181 FSC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans. shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of • equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2007California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, 'Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD46 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1. RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply 'are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost • recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant — Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. • 6 B & C-182 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, • witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. • PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. • 7 B & C-183 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of • the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. • 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8 '/" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • 8 • B & C-184 City of Rancho Cucamonga ' ,,. Building & Safety Department ''`t�'��� Ite--1 op 95 10500 Civic Center Dr. Y w t Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 &s„'�+s rAat, T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 -etc fred—t Q-LC 441. -6ei 2) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; 3) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; 4) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. B. COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: fl 1. See Section E —Additional Department Comments. �O\ C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Should underground injection wells be proposed as a water quality management plan best management practice, the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit. 2. An HCOC exists for the downstream receiving water. The downstream receiving water (Mill Creek, Prado Area) is experiencing significant degradation of its banks. The project must implement a volume-based treatment control BMP (retention/detention facility) on each lot. The Storm Water Quality Management Plan and the grading plan must contain an appropriate volume based BMP prior to the issuance of a grading •er 3. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to D accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 4. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM18794\DRC2007-00551 SUBTPM 18794 Grading Committee Project Report#2, 20100615.doc (F:), 4 of 7 STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT Li RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: October 13, 2010 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: . Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00314 - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL - A proposal to demolish an existing 5,489 square foot building that was formerly used as a bank at 9709 Base Line Road and construct a Taco Bell fast food restaurant with drive-thru of 2,432 square feet at an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue. APN - 1077-011-45. Related files: Development Review DRC2010-00314D, Variance DRC2010-00565, Tree Removal Permit DRC2010-00564, and Uniform Sign Program No. 4 Amendment DRC2010-00404. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA review and qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - as the proposed fast food restaurant is under 2,500 square feet in gross floor area. . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00314D - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL • - A proposal to demolish an existing 5,489 square foot building that was formerly used as a bank at 9709 Base Line Road and construct a Taco Bell fast food restaurant with drive-thru of 2,432 square feet at an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue. APN - 1077-011-45. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00314, Variance DRC2010-00565, Tree Removal Permit DRC2010-00564, and Uniform Sign Program No. 4 Amendment DRC2010-00404. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA review and qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small . Structures - as the proposed fast food restaurant is under 2,500 square feet in gross floor area. VARIANCE DRC2010-00565 - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL - A request to allow an encroachment into the required street setbacks along Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road in conjunction with a proposal to demolish an existing 5,489 square foot building that was formerly used as a bank at 9709 Base Line Road and construct a Taco Bell fast food restaurant with drive-thru of 2,432 square feet at an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue - APN: 1077-011-45. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00314, Development Review DRC2010-00314D, Tree Removal Permit DRC2010-00564, and Uniform Sign Program No. 4 Amendment DRC2010-00404. • • Items D,E,F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2010-00314, DRC2010-00314D, AND DRC2010-00565 HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL • October 13, 2010 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Site - Commercial Building (formerly a drive-thru bank; the project site is within a shopping center) — Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District North - Shopping Center— Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District South - Shopping Center — Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District East - Shopping Center— Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District West - Shopping Center— Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District • B. General Plan Designations: Site - Neighborhood Commercial North - Neighborhood Commercial South - Neighborhood Commercial East - Neighborhood Commercial West - Neighborhood Commercial C. Site Characteristics: The project site is located within a shopping center located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue (Exhibit B). This shopping center was reviewed and approved around 1979 (Related file: DR79-24). It is approximately 376,000 square feet (8.6 acres) and approximately 610 feet (east to west) by approximately • 650 feet (north to south). The shopping center is comprised of seven (7) buildings, with a combined floor area of about 99,500 square feet on seven (7) parcels. One of the major anchor tenants is the Dollar Tree; the other major anchor tenant space will be occupied by 99 Ranch Market in late 2010/early 2011 following completion of interior improvements for that tenant. Three (3) of the seven (7) buildings are contiguous to each other and form a single strip that is located at the south side.of the site. The other four (4) buildings are single-tenant pad buildings or multi-tenant buildings that are located along the north and east sides of the site. The specific location of the project site is a parcel of about 41,500 square feet (0.95 acre) located at the northwest corner of the shopping center near the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road (APN: 1077-011-45). The "area of work" is presently developed with a vacant 5,488 square foot building that was previously a bank with drive-thru customer service. To the north and west of the shopping center is a commercial development, while to the south and east is residential development. The zoning of the shopping center is Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. The zoning of the properties to the north is Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. The properties to the west are zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District and Office Professional (OP) District. The zoning of the properties to the south and east is Low (L) Residential District. D. Parking Calculations: The parking calculation for the shopping center is 4.5 parking stalls per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area per Section 17.12.040(B)(1)(1) of the Development Code. • • D,E, F- 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2010-00314, DRC2010-00314D, AND DRC2010-00565 • HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 Page 3 Type Floor Area Parking No. of Spaces No. of Spaces of Use (SF) Ratio Required Provided Shopping Center 99,484 4.5/1,000 448 453 (existing) Shopping Center 86,428 4.5/1,000 434 431 (see (after construction) discussion below) The shopping center has a gross floor area of 99,484 square feet. There are currently 453 parking stalls of which 448 stalls are required. The remaining 5 stalls are excess capacity. When the shopping center was originally approved, there were more stalls on-site. It appears that the striping for some of these stalls was not consistently maintained during the intervening 30 years. The proposed project includes new paving and revisions to the parking area to accommodate vehicle circulation. Forty-two (42) parking stalls will be removed and replaced by twenty (20) new stalls. When the project is completed, the shopping center will have a gross floor area of 96,428 square feet. There will be 431 parking stalls as the applicant will be removing a net total of twenty-two (22) parking stalls. As 434 parking stalls are required, there is a deficiency of three (3) parking stalls. To address this deficiency, three (3) new stalls will be restriped at the south side of the shopping center so that the number of parking stalls provided matches the number of parking.stalls required. ANALYSIS: • A. General: The applicant, on behalf of Taco Bell, proposes to demolish the previously described building and construct a fast food restaurant of 2,432 square feet (Exhibits E and F). The proposed restaurant will be situated on the site in the same general area as the previous building. Similarly, the new canopy at the drive-thru customer service window of the proposed restaurant will be located in the same general area as the canopy of the bank. Like most fast food restaurants, the proposal will have a drive-thru lane; the existing drive-thru aisle will remain in-place and be extended to serve this purpose. This new Taco Bell restaurant will replace the existing Taco Bell restaurant that is located approximately 300 feet to the west of the project site at 9651 Base Line Road in the shopping center at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue (Exhibit C). As the west tower and drive-thru canopy will encroach into the building setback along Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road, respectively, the applicant has submitted a Variance request to permit these encroachments (Related file: Variance DRC2010-00565). Also included in the proposal will be new landscaping and trees. The existing trees within the work area will have to be removed; the applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit for this purpose (Related file: DRC2010-00564). B. Floor/Area Analysis: Per Chapter 2, Figure LU-2, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) in the Neighborhood Commercial land use category is 35 percent. The net area of the project site is approximately 376,000 square feet. Following the completion of the restaurant, the building coverage, including the existing buildings, will be 96,428 square feet. Therefore, the floor area ratio for this site will be 25.6 percent. • • D, E, F- 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2010-00314, DRC2010-00314D, AND DRC2010-00565 HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 • Page 4 C. Description of Operations: The proposed fast food restaurant will operate everyday with hours that will vary. The proposed hours are 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. (Sunday), 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. (Monday through Thursday), and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. (Friday and Saturday). It is expected that there will be a total of twenty (20) employees. Four (4) employees will work per shift and the peak period of operations is expected to be 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Deliveries will occur during non-peak hours; deliveries will be via a 35-foot truck (Exhibit 0). No outdoor seating is proposed based on the Site Plan. D. Land Use Compatibility: The project will be consistent with the development district of the site, the surrounding development districts, and the shopping center in which it will be located (Exhibit P). A fast food restaurant is an expected land use within commercial districts. The project will be compatible with the surrounding shopping center. As the proposed restaurant replaces an existing Taco Bell in the general vicinity, a significant intensification of activity is not expected. Existing infrastructure and on-site improvements within the shopping center will adequately serve the new restaurant. The closest residences to the site are adjacent to the south side of the shopping center where the restaurant will be located. These residences are about 450 feet south of the project site and are 'buffered' by existing buildings from the potential negative effects (such as excessive noise and glare) that could be generated by the restaurant. The height of all new parking lot lights will be 15 feet high and in compliance with Section 17.12.030(A)(8) of the Development Code. E. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The project was reviewed by the Grading and • Technical Review Committees on September 14, 2010. The Committees accepted the application and recommended approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. F. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Munoz and Granger) on September 14, 2010. Although the architecture of the restaurant will not match the architecture of.the shopping center, as the center was approved and constructed about 30 years ago, the Committee agreed with staff that the architecture of the restaurant is more consistent with the current design standards and policies of the City. The applicant agreed to complete, or comply with the issues identified in the Design Review Committee comments•report. Staff has incorporated into the Resolution of Approval special conditions for the completion of any remaining issues. The Committee recommends approval • to the Planning Commission (Exhibit N). G. Uniform Sign Program: The applicant submitted a draft Uniform Sign Program to amend Uniform Sign Program No. 4 for review by the City to ensure that any proposed signs would be compatible with the architecture of the building, the shopping center, and in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance. This sign program was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Granger), and the Committee recommended approval to the Planning Director for final approval. H. Variance DRC2010-00565: The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a reduced building setback and landscape depth along both Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue. Per Table 17.10.040-B of the Development Code for both streets, the required building setback is • 45 feet, and the required landscape depth is 45 feet with an average of 30 feet. Both D,E, F- 4 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2010-00314, DRC2010-003140, AND DRC2010-00565 • HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 Page 5 setbacks are measured from the curbface. The applicant's proposed fast food restaurant will have a building setback of approximately 39 feet on Base Line Road and approximately 38 feet on Archibald Avenue. The parts of the building that will encroach into the building setbacks are the tower element at the west entrance of the restaurant and the canopy over the drive-thru lane. The majority of the building will be at or beyond the building setback line. The landscape depth along Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue will be 20 feet and 37 feet, respectively. The applicant proposes to utilize the existing drive-thru lane with only limited modifications. As a result, the landscape depth will remain unchanged. Facts For Findings: The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards. In order to grant a request for a Variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings. Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property. The following are facts to support the necessary findings: 1. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code. • Fact/s: The proposed restaurant will be located at the northwest corner of an existing shopping center. The "project area" is generally defined by the property lines • of the parcel on which the restaurant will be located. Although the restaurant will replace an existing building at this location, there are improvements just beyond the project area that will remain in-place and, therefore, restrict options available to the applicant to comply with setback requirements. There is an east to west drive aisle to the south and a north to south drive aisle to the east of the respective south and east limits of the work area. These drive aisles link the parking lot of the shopping center with the respective drive entrances at Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road. These features cannot be modified without negatively affecting vehicle circulation within the shopping center. Furthermore, these features are outside the applicant's limit of work. As an alternative, the building and the corresponding parking area and drive aisle for the restaurant could be shifted south and east. However, doing so would require the elimination or reduction in the dimensions of at least one of the following three features that will be constructed or installed along the south of the project area: a) the new drive aisle, b) the row of sixteen (16) parking stalls, and c) the landscape area. None of these can be reduced nor eliminated without violating other sections of the Development Code. 2. Finding: That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Fact/s: All new development is required to comply with the City's architectural standards. These standards include requiring features such as tower • elements at primary entrances and articulated wall planes. The proposed restaurant will have a tower element and a canopy on the west and north • D,E, F- 5 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2010-00314, DRC2010-00314D, AND DRC2010-00565 HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL • October 13, 2010 Page 6 elevations, respectively, of the building. As the project site is only about 0.95 acre in area, opportunities for different designs are limited – the project as proposed, represents the 'best fit' for the site. Although these features could be removed, this would result in a building that would not comply with the City's design standards and policies. The proposed restaurant replaces a building that was within the building setbacks and had a drive-thru lane that was within the landscape depth setback. The applicant will replace this building with a smaller building and utilize the existing drive-thru lane. The applicant cannot increase the landscape depth without affecting existing improvements surrounding the project site that are beyond the applicant's scope of work. The locations of the existing drive aisles cannot be altered without affecting the circulation patterns within the shopping center, and the drive approaches cannot be shifted without affecting access. 3. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Fact/s: Based on a review of an aerial photo and site inspection, there are other buildings in the immediate vicinity that are within the building and landscape setbacks: Hanmi Bank at 9759 Base Line Road; Union 76 gas station at 7287 Archibald Avenue; US Bank at 9696 Base Line Road; and Urgent Care • Center at 9695 Base Line Road. With the exception of Hanmi Bank all of the cited buildings are adjacent to the intersection of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue. The proposed restaurant will replace a building that was • formerly a bank. That building also encroached into the building and landscape setbacks. The .proposal includes both a canopy at the drive-thru °— window'and-a-drive=thru-lane that:will be at-the same-general location as the similar'feature's-that-were were-utilized-b9 the former bank. 4. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact/s: The proposal is an in-fill project. There is a shopping center that surrounds the project site that restricts flexibility on the design of the restaurant, the arrangement and location of the corresponding parking area, and location and quantity of landscaping. There are no practical alternatives, i.e. relocating features of the project will affect other aspects of the project, such as the architecture of the building and the location of the drive-thru lane. Furthermore, the width of the drive aisles, landscaped planter areas, and parking stalls, as proposed, meet minimum technical standards. Any adjustments will negatively alter these other improvements. Although requests for Variances for encroachments into setbacks are not common, they are granted when surrounding improvements or other City requirements restrict alternate options. • ...:,. ..:'...aW±.::•'. -..:a^:ru-l)6 -o-s::.G:Cn.�.l.:-`..,ir;..� .. :.r...... - .:.:.'Y.o.c:'N.`.�:.:^ _�N" - •s.'.': ... ., ... i .r .:r.::: D,E, F- 6 - . • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2010-00314, DRC2010-00314D, AND DRC2010-00565 • HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 Page 7 5. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact/s: The project has been designed to take into account the orientation of the restaurant in relation to the adjoining tenants within the surrounding shopping center, the location of the existing improvements, parking, regular and emergency access; and overall usability. The granting of this Variance will not affect the characteristics of the surrounding community. I. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - as the proposed fast food restaurant is less than 2,500 square feet in gross floor area. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments were received by staff. • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00314, Development Review DRC2010-00314D, and Variance DRC20010-00565 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, ( -� Jam R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:MS/ge • • • D, E,F- 7 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2010-00314, DRC2010-00314D, AND DRC2010-00565 HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 • Page 8 Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Map Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Overall Site Plan Exhibit E - Existing Site Plan Exhibit F - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit G - Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit H - Floor Plan Exhibit I - Roof Plan and Sections Exhibit J - Building Elevations and Architectural Details Exhibit K - Bus Shelter and Trash Enclosure Details Exhibit L - Photometric Plan Exhibit M - Landscape Plan Exhibit N - Design Review Committee Action Comments, dated September 14, 2010 Exhibit 0 - Correspondence from the applicant Exhibit P - List of Tenants with Descriptions and Hours of Operations Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00314 Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2010-00314D Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2010-00565 • • • D., E, F- 8 .. i c ,Goiltil I § Ul ii, iLL.V .211" -I re i :I j 'E.L.1 Lir - tsa 1 1 _ ALTA i lick d ',LT -ii L___1 L.-,,ii 4 ,, A . Li . itil Lirr _.._, , , ,L.,,....._____It- -1 I g i i ----ao ...,-k ll colkiVIS 11:2171.14 11'Ji.L.T4Qt I -L'LL''', .- ilitunwic-- ft z;I lE__N•GE -4 I SIJ g p MASSY JLiri 2--1`'s !--- ILifinji:11 Da .igi__ E4- / -i . S •2•4- • E j 1 1 ritir r - 1 I.kle .vi i 3 411/ . r,,,2 I q - I:. .r_L-39 , _ ,,„NE,,,,„„,g, .„ ,g „id ii±t±1—' r ,_. ,L__- _...,, ,, . ‘ -... -, I i I a , --q- ".1.r.,-..C.14fiPARIC."- UilGUIVID7AV, _ill ------- - him lInt_Nus li: • Iva- n &STA r, k" .,••• in q .r 4, i,,;,,4 : ,.3ir _ • tours ru, ii- . ,.. i4:11Pc _ 2[UMW CI 5T1,111"•=4- 24117;i V :' lt % ei•' 1 1 f. ,! --'4_1 • „ t .5...J.-4 -TA! .- , I 1 SAGE CT 4 TAMIEICCO Cl Ki KKR 1 ire • 5 ,-, itacro I .kI_ _j station Al 14e--5 ,•••••,•• .0;411 . . . AVE Lai -±1- :. A. _nith_. "ars__,0 , __q__B ,li■yE i I IJ:1 1 MN 57 6 7 _ic --, , , , -CANort--4.„,,F _, i T.,. ..c44 ,fl1/4Pwurs-fr,... t THLit: ' ,Ag PROJECT SITE - :F1_16. 1 '- .ri;' g --, - .0 -1 1_, „vicanEug_a_ .,,, Jae 71 'aCttl "0 - ig) ll E .t. /Pt,'V 1 --.'"*- 0-4ff k -I ilL -VIME m___,...s, &Q11-171X antlithilLIIIL aLtt111.1ILA.r„s1=ftg."-§wirfil. gh I rci0 isi ui -Mont-- --r. -1 R ' ' - ' g r I -111-5lilg LAIIVIIIVRR I ''''llir 111,78tRcal--,-_-. 40 LO ' 'r 1 > ei „ _ • ' 141 III 114-91/NEyAN ystra_c .. e41 IEL,,,o,, n t,i§il iffir—, .1:11A , ;1, 5r ":),, 1-VMErill “i_ -.5.--C II -A;;H:1 lAidlicelthiWoNcA ,j IJOIL rffmaAr A LI gr___LE951111T3V L--.--7 1 Elo ...ai ,„, . r_ Ay, •,,,,C:ENTRALPAW.W.z. I rim Ring R. • MI E 7 ' !NJ !Lir 9.r RD erir -- -T. ,„,. , ,--, ,BASE' • LIL E':.t.'• -:.,, 1.RrIA s oo BAS irirdc ' `A-1 ru- RA•'''; • .-.... I - ara ON ••• '4,-I .„. ,..I.l• . > , Fit .....-Iri, er 1 . ,r!...t.-_-_-: 171-='7 ? , w4--- ,...ft` r 1 --',1 i ,zn,..i. - ,;•.A -- i ,,, - a .., I' ' 4% • =,. 1 , • ‘'"3- ,r- "ODA-i HILL;.rotiza g ._.1.0 -,ALTD SI L LI 1 '7Ern 1 ..171t. il , _, •/ARK no26 r; 1 i BALS1_1___US.j. . . : .1 1 1 lir . . C ' ‘. IgiCf.r-C.; .-t - --•- ' ire; --,;:: tr.:— -- "1 , 1,- a ,40,,,G, ..,... ._ L..,, -:_. , . ,.,_,•1 12---LIC, 1.1‘ 11 ' El C° • .149..., miun .:e 11, . °111°-___„'"-71,,' rit i q y : i F2 .tz k '2 V ' T.- ,R.- . - : .Ult1R1211 e .fr / Atli_'- 4.-,-H'RLITH- .1 , s• i-.- rasx -. E Nta ' •LE-g. i •"!1':"'-f-t.:.•"4 ji ..ir ... §. s__, I 2 41 -/ ,•.;:l •■ / --'^ • k-1.4*-7;j: ' ' "L'' ' 1 v„,:I m 2 -• '4- „ r---1, -a TA . .- --, 1 c*, AVE•:. , jr. - n■ a r _ ,s,i_w_ awl i i 45:11>--\t-41Crikyeicyyrr: ' ril- All ' '' i ;- 4111. Elyte846:y <, • i va,, . I 1 „ i g 6 iiri ,,,o, a:7s. .iit. ... III toossuluf RALPHId',7 ,- A AS •i L _ !, r.)4i - -I r; —' sl--.. „cis,' i ;. •2 ,V/STA.•,. ----:--,.-____liPARKL___----- .. . , 0 t u — . -170VVIV:CENTER isponrsl *.ilL LLgil Station 2 EsiaQ kik .CERTER t rill S , HISTORIC • 1 5 gil Fe• BILL BL ;1 I -1 ______ii, • 1 1 - ,Ita11143KICL CI IS im, , , , . , ,,, ! COURT ...”- Eat" ° i i alAMESE11; 1 7----- . HOUSE [.I.EIS ! LeT1,4„4„'‘I___ i , 4 il El- 'It. 5 Hajtjak it,44,11 ,• I Li. V, filATTL poLs_c.E - i„A.A.>, • pl,:_srAno C I MOSPITAI .1 cH - ET Lz r-.1 __ -.I.,...2.. ..il raJOCTTS - a Riainvi - •V` 4E-art.• \4 •1 I El . LE Itrffiltpcm"L . :. . 1 1 1 1 '..-5* BEACH ir.d4:. 12 L BELO.4 ;• . F44041.54X I sartntial Pt • I „ "'swam' it_ ,'. -6 Et _. ! . .;-----E-. 1 n i • . 2 0110•14D WADOwS Li 1 WNW HEM 4 11.01(1•41111 1 MYBERire WY r >LLI I I a , ,. .. > i , !- - kin Isql .... L.r41 a —it ggt g Luz ,Li , 911iS1 _ra CUCAMONGEsdszt, it-- a s - 1 Hs, > v !in'Cl : 7 : - 1 - . 1 CITY 4 .111Qtr"11 Cil Fla , A op - . 1 if_ 'X ' ', IN, =, il I .JJERSEL131.1/0____I CORPORATE 5Di E L.31,Fat i F.14 cup Aft-Nail; •1 1 YARD mi ____Le„-S-L-F.,,,-- 0 01V 1 2••2: J _-...5d I 1 e cr . - , Metrohnk =Lii < - Pr011i rig=ii —: , . METROLINK TRAIN Station '■4_- _ ,_,__ ________ ..-.--.. - 8TH ST 1\ 1 77,1 i 0,DIA,Sn- DM SI 1 . A 4.4,14 r 1 I — rt' •I•an'Sg. : 41 I : ,./ \ -nq _„ _,1•SI _ Ers. 14 w• ?ULF [1 VERNE r4 L— /.1 i I • • •AtrA• —/— nin isa_ ! .tz , •2 E WINO MK OR h‘4,, r PAR I RIIDE. 'wife" 1 ; L4 K ES ; \\TIR:1-01 L 23' 1 E—i n zi ' i I ' GOLF i • .St [ 1 '1 COURSE ‘ VOICPP)Sii , 2 02 I . - 1 Cr \ 1,-,;/ ..,Fair. : .. • . 1 i I , w fa'p...coow _•..y.I._ az I , 1 E : I : - . t • ais-vzifil „,..;„,-7,-,—i c, > . c Q0Clio : - . g E I k.) 5 : ; 5 5, ,-x, ,..:0 aii !I.E.?,a I , 19 : . EXHIBIT A ,_:• t L„,,kig,ry „\t.i -1, -,---ei -1 g i air---'1------ 1...,,, ..1.41......1 • 1 / rat 4TH ST I I :, L • Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00314•Development Review DRC2010-00314D Variance DRC2010-00565 wilpcfgx,?'PP a >• 4xi� t R•. 1 i t i .[ iiY�•. s Y`� �r 'f frf a 4 b 1 j'�l4 aTfi o"EE... I fi,>�, . .yY�L r .� ?if, I' »_'isit _ I R x"Pr}aLa .`ti'e,w•• a tv �M +�k4t4ts:i 4 (� �e ' r 5ESSTJ r .i, *.rk+,''k". + �� p r 'G• ui` :'� 4774'a ;::.�f"' s StFJ T "(L>< �y�� , r i ,4 w x --' �I' - x let t S 1 T •- _ .cam t r� -� 4i r Based ne�Road e"•5+. L+. °-s. Y. TvC i �j _IC" v `t': .t t - t:_ t ,.s.... +'� a � .ex.q i L. +«r r K Pf+t,� .' ; _ Project ` ' -t„tt� �r •i.tom 1,• !,E .,.a � ' s a t ', .y� ter ; -, .,„a I :'- '�, ,. 1 yar ' :'..l _ r � _;;;a E . t-sr { iuS ' � Sl,J �¢ � ff Ia -a'+"� � - � �j w co � , Iej Jw n int." 4.PF 2''+”!•H.c, - 4 Aim I I -.� _; + , rsit �'?` ,�9`-•" „..; �i} , `}.. Z r .a l >..• C. %.,...:f•-.•ax. ""�" {. ---:. tt�l ]_._4. `"�'-„ y N 4r ,C' r L:.;j;; ✓ �' f l f� `b+i - ..,4;.-14,4--: `+ ° (�yeZt i ds T N :111714-P1--11C'� , _:+� r i"' a .+'' r ! f ° .4f d7 .;• •:•.4_,'.*--1r,€- ua ?. a333 7-71:: 2 tA0 , !x r}x ,v ` Ir ,:4+/ .r'..r !j�..r ' f m `?.. �•Ii -, .€ TL1'1._ s a'vy� E r,. f: y"� f'!r _s+ t,+ :lull c i i +rJ �t + ' L '2 _.--.� � 2 <C J s .a+a !iSs�ez r . titTc§ fs4 y�tYd e.� 5�.� a -y - .r'`- _ 7 .� • r-,.-,• Mc_ - L" z ..„:„.. .,,,r.„Sure , ''E J 'F�+ �[ _� ,:°- _ •-gi 8 t "litArt>y`�]R 'i$� l,` r` , r'`� �, a.'2 ..'� tF I xy't `*S a�( 4 "G { f J J.=L'j `,,flu ami �l`F,s tt' a r-° .1Y -ci.+. r #^ i S .4".s P `ra� ��`t`t����E i �,''i:: 1 q;1' ,,{ <�v3 ti„'"3r'6' „t '* 1 Mxr ': -' ' s, T4t1T.y ..t..4 �. t9- ** 4* ' _ r a t ^�/' G w.:rwa e e r ,i�'441 .:LA .J r3 ; r' `� ori"..a a.. :2. �Wt �,-t rr r� ' ,v,xsr - eE J ? si��lr�::}I�i tPtl Ck"" • .. :zti' L l" 4r r Yd€ " _ so ` it-it :�<Iv Zl.-4L1ii\ : 1 4 - "..1''..1_ o 'dy4'.st �4-/ �r— r set t " °]�` 'a :i .RU t?$_.. Wit_= tom t C- � " ' _at EXHIBIT B Its � ` t` t �6 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:40 p.m. Mike Smith September 14, 2010 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00314 - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL - A proposal to demolish an existing 5,489 square foot building that was formerly used as a bank located at 9709 Base Line Road and construct a Taco Bell fast food restaurant with drive-thru of 2,432 square feet at an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue - APN: 1077-011-45. Related files: Development Review DRC2010-00314D, Variance DRC2010-00565, Tree Removal Permit DRC2010-00564, and Uniform Sign Program No. 4 Amendment DRC2010-00404. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA review and qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - as the proposed fast food restaurant is under 2,500 square feet in gross floor area. . . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00314D - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL - A proposal to demolish an existing 5,489 square foot building that was formerly used as a bank located at 9709 Base Line Road and construct a Taco Bell fast food restaurant with drive-thru of 2,432 square feet at an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue - APN: 1077-011-45. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00314, Variance DRC2010-00565, Tree Removal Permit DRC2010-00564, and Uniform Sign Program No. 4 Amendment DRC2010-00404. Staff has determined that the project is • categorically exempt from CEQA review and qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - as the proposed fast food restaurant is under 2,500 square feet in gross floor area. Design Parameters: The project site is located within a shopping center that was reviewed and approved around 1979 (Related File: DR79-24) of approximately 376,000 square feet (8.6 acres) that is approximately 610 feet (east to west) by approximately 650 feet (north to south). The shopping center is comprised of seven (7) buildings with a combined floor area of 99,500 square feet. Three (3) of the seven (7) buildings are contiguous to each other and form a single strip that is located at the south side of the site. The other four (4) buildings are single-tenant pad buildings or multi-tenant buildings that are located along the north and east sides of the site. The specific location of the project site is at the northwest corner of the shopping center near the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road. The area of work is presently developed with a vacant 5,488 square foot building that was previously a bank with a drive-thru customer service. To the north and west of the shopping center, is a commercial development, while to the south and east is residential development. The zoning of the center is Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. The zoning of the properties to the north is Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. The properties to the west are zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District and Office Professional (OP) District. The zoning of the properties to the south and east is Low (L) Residential District. The applicant, on behalf of Taco Bell, proposes to demolish the previously described building and in its place construct a fast food restaurant of 2,432 square feet. The proposed restaurant will be situated on the site in the same general area as the previous building. Similarly, the new canopy at the drive-thru customer service window of the proposed restaurant will be located in the same general area as the canopy of the bank. Like most fast food restaurants; the proposal will have a drive-thru lane; the existing • drive-thru aisle will remain in-place and extended to serve this purpose. The west tower and drive-thru canopy will encroach into the building setback along Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road, EXHIBIT N D,E,F- 27 • DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2010-00314 — HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL • September 14, 2010 Page 2 respectively. The applicant has submitted a request to permit these encroachments (Related File: Variance DRC2010-00565). As the architecture of the surrounding shopping center is dated and was completed before the City had established its current design guidelines, the proposed restaurant will include only some of the architectural elements used on the other buildings within the center such as stucco finish and clay S-tile roofing. Consistent with the current design policies and direction established by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission, more contemporary architectural elements are proposed. These include prominent 'towers that identify the entrances to the building and more substantial tower support columns, i.e. the columns are larger in cross-section than the existing support columns present throughout most of the center. A wainscot with a stackstone veneer on all elevations of the building is proposed instead of the wood paneled framework that exists beneath the windows of the existing buildings. The trash enclosure will be designed per City standard and include an overhead trellis and materials and finish to match the proposed building. A new bus shelter with materials and finish to match the proposed building is also proposed. The support columns of the 'towers' will have a stackstone veneer instead of either painted concrete masonry on the corresponding columns that are present at the anchor tenants or plain, exposed approximately 4-inch by 4-inch wood members that are present in front of the in-line tenants. Included in the proposal will be new paving and revisions to the parking area to accommodate vehicle circulation. Forty-two (42) parking stalls will be removed and replaced by twenty (20) new stalls. The • removal of these stalls will have an impact as following completion of the proposed improvements there will be 431 parking stalls and a deficiency of three (3) parking stalls. The shopping center has 453 parking stalls of which 433 stalls are required and the remaining 20 stalls are excess capacity. Staff notes to the Committee that when the shopping center was originally approved, there were more stalls on-site. It appears that the striping for some of these stalls was not consistently maintained during the intervening 30 years. To address this deficiency, staff recommends a condition of approval requiring that three (3) new stalls be restriped at the south side of the shopping center. This will, in turn, restore some of the stalls that were originally on-site. The surrounding landscaping will be revised, and some trees will be removed (Related File: Tree Removal Permit DRC2010-00564). In general, the landscaping along the street frontages will remain • unchanged. Access to the restaurant will be via existing driveways and drive aisles. No new access points are proposed. Lastly, a new monument sign is proposed for identification (Related File: Uniform Sign Program No. 4 Amendment (DRC2010-00404). • Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: None. Secondary Issues: Secondary design issues are as follows: 1. The light standards shall not exceed 15 feet in height measured from the adjacent finished surface or finished grade. This height includes the base, pole, and the fixture. 2. Revise the bus shelter to incorporate rear and side walls that are 5 feet in height. • 3. The landscaping shall comply with Ordinance No. 823, a new Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance D,E, F- 28 • • DRC ACTION AGENDA . • DRC2010-00314— HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL September 14, 2010 Page 3 adopted by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council On December 2, 2009. 4. The access door for the equipment enclosure on the east side of the building shall be a solid door instead of a wrought iron gate/door. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices, etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark forest green or equivalent. 2. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall. 3. All downspouts on all elevations of the building shall be routed through the interior of the building. 4. All signs shall comply with the applicable provisions of the City's Sign Ordinance and Uniform Sign Program No. 4 (and any pending amendments). Technical Issues: The parking requirement for the shopping center, following completion of the fast food restaurant, is 434 parking stalls, while the number of parking stalls provided will be 431 spaces. To address the deficit of three (3) parking stalls, the applicant shall provide three (3) new stalls in the parking area behind the future 99 Ranch Market. Note: this is a partial restoration of some of the previously existing parking stalls for the overall shopping center as it was approved in 1979. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed the application and deemed it acceptable for forwarding to the Planning Commission for review and action. The Committee concluded that the architecture of the fast food restaurant was consistent with the design standards and policies of the City and approved the design as submitted. The Committee acknowledged and accepted that the architecture of the restaurant would not match the architecture of the shopping center. The center was approved and constructed about 30 years ago, and the architecture is now dated while the architecture of the restaurant is more consistent with current standards. The applicant requested permission to add more landscaping in the drive-thru lane parallel to Base Line Road to prevent vehicles from accidentally hitting the columns supporting the overhead canopy — this request was approved. That applicant asked for clarification of where the new parking stalls were to be located, and staff identified the location. The applicant agreed to complete or comply with the issues identified in the Design Review Committee comments report. Staff will incorporate into the Resolution of Approval a set of special conditions stating that these remaining issues shall be addressed in the plans submitted for plan check. • Members Present: Munoz, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith D, E, F- 29 Y `'� May 3 2010 • ARCHITECTS 09047 Rancho Cucamonga Taco Bell. Description of Operations Taco Bell Operates between 19-21 hours per day. The staff of 4 per shift operates on approximately 4 hour shifts. There is a designated Shift Lead per shift. The majority of sales come from the Drive-Thru portion of operations. Deliveries are made during non- peak hours with a 35 Ft. Delivery Truck. • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAY 04 mu RECEIVED-PLANNING • • EXHIBIT0 Telephone (951)37) 307 Facsimile (951) 371-5924 www.hcanddarchitects.com • List of all tenants within the shopping center 9775 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name /Address Type of Use Size Hours of Operation • Vacant Vacant 5,488 s.f N/A 9709 Baseline Road • Vacant Vacant 1,500 s.f N/A 9713 Baseline Road • Vacant Vacant 1,200 s.f N/A 9717 Baseline Road • Kalvin's Donuts Food Service 900 s.f. 4am-2pm Mon-Sat 9721 Baseline Road 4am-lpm Sunday • Magic Touch Cleaners Retail Service 1,500 s.f. 7am-7pm Mon-Fri 9723 Baseline Road 8am-5pm Sunday • Dollar Tree Retail 20,000 s.f 9am-9pm Mon-Sat • 9743 Baseline Road 10am-7pm Sunday • Discount Store - Rack Retail 9,716 s.f l0am-8pm Mon-Sat 9749 Baseline Road 10am-6pm Sunday • Hanmi Bank Bank 2,400 s.f 9am-5pm Mon-Thu 9759 Baseline Road 10am-6pm Friday 9am-lpm Saturday • 99 Ranch Market Grocery Store 42,480 s.f. 9am-9pm, Daily 9775 Baseline Road • Star Nails Service 1,000s.f. 9:30am-7pm Mon-Sat 9779 Baseline Road l0am-5pm Sunday • Cucamonga Hair Co. Service 1,000 s.f 9am-6pm, Tue-Sat 9781 Baseline Road • Classic Homes Commercial Service 1,000 s.f. 9am-5pm Mon-Sat 9783 Baseline Road • Postnet Retail 1,250 s.f 9:30am-6:30pm M-F • 9785 Baseline Road l0am-4pm Saturday EXHIBIT P D, E, F- 31 • Nancy's Hallmark Retail 2,250 s.f 9:30am-7pm, Mon-Fri • 9789 Baseline Road 9:30am-6pm Saturday • Dr. Calma DDS Dental Office 1,000 s.f 10am-7pm Tue-Sat 9791 Baseline Road • Vacant Vacant 2,000 s.f N/A 9795 Baseline Road • Tacos Don Julio Restaurant 1,225 s.f 9am-8pm, daily 9799-a Baseline Road • Little Caesars Restaurant 1,100 s.f. 10:30am-10pm, daily 9799-b Baseline Road • Myumg Dong Tofu Restarant Restaurant 2,475 s.f 11 am-9:30pm, daily 9799-d Baseline Road • • D,E, F- 32 • • RESOLUTION NO. 10-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00314 A PROPOSAL TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING 5,489 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING THAT WAS FORMERLY USED AS A BANK AT 9709 BASE LINE ROAD AND CONSTRUCT A TACO BELL FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THRU OF 2,432 SQUARE FEET AT AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1077-011-45. A. Recitals. 1. HC&D Architects, on behalf of Taco Bell, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00314, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as the application." 2. On the 13th day of October 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on October 13, 2010, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a shopping center located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue; and b. The shopping center is approximately 376,000 square feet (8.6 acres) and is approximately 610 feet (east to west) by approximately 650 feet (north to south); and c. The specific location of the project site is at the northwest corner of the shopping center near the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road (APN: 1077-011-45). The "area of work" is a parcel of approximately 41,500 square feet (0.95 acre) that is presently developed with a vacant 5,489 square foot building that was previously a bank with drive-thru customer service; and • d. The shopping center is bound on the north and west by commercial development and is bound to the south and east by residential development; and D,E,F- 33 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-44 • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00314 - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 Page 2 • e. The zoning of the shopping center is Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. The zoning of the properties to the north is Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. The properties to the west are zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District and Office Professional (OP) District. The zoning of the properties to the south and east is Low (L) Residential District; and f. The existing combined gross floor area of the buildings within the shopping center is 99,484 square feet. Following completion of the project, the combined gross floor area will be 96,428 square feet; and g. The proposal is for a Taco Bell fast food restaurant of 2,432 square feet with a drive-thru lane; and h. This application is in conjunction with Development Review DRC2010-00314D and • Variance DRC2010-00565; and i. The proposed fast food restaurant will operate everyday with hours of 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. (Sunday), 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. (Monday through Thursday), and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. (Friday and Saturday); and j. The proposed fast food restaurant will have a total of twenty (20) employees with four (4) employees working per shift; and k. No outdoor seating is proposed; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the • above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed project is a fast food restaurant. This use is permitted with a Conditional Use Permit in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. The underlying General Plan designation is General Commercial; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is within a shopping center; the proposed land use is consistent with the existing land use and the expectations of the community. The properties to the north of the shopping center are zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, and the properties to the west of the shopping center are zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District and Office Professional (OP) District. The properties to the south and east of the shopping center are zoned Low (L) Residential District; and • c. ' The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code except the building and landscape depth along Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue; the applicant has submitted a request for a Variance (Related file: DRC2010-00565)for the Commission's review and approval. The proposed development otherwise meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards • and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. D, E, F- 34 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-44 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00314 - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 • Page 3 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303- New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures -as the proposed fast food restaurant is less than 2,500 square feet in gross floor area. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the operation of a fast food restaurant of approximately 2,432 square feet on a parcel of about 41,500 square feet (0.95 acre) within an existing shopping center of about 376,000 square feet (8.6 acres) in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue - APN: 077-011-45. • 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) The restaurant shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels. If operation of the restaurant causes adverse effects upon the shopping center, the tenants of the shopping center, and/or adjacent businesses or operations, then the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 4) The hours of operation shall be 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. (Sunday), 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. (Monday through Thursday), and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. (Friday and Saturday). 5) Any modification or intensification of the existing uses including a change in operating hours, addition of outdoor seating, any improvements including expansion of the floor area of the restaurant, and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit shall require the review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. • 6) Outdoor storage of equipment, supplies, materials, and trash is prohibited. D, E,F- 35 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-44 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00314 - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 Page 4 • 7) All signs shall comply with the City's Sign Ordinance and Uniform Sign Program No. 64 (as amended per DRC2010-00404). 8) All Conditions of Approval for Development Review DRC2010-00314D shall apply. Engineering Department 1) Development Impact Fees due at Building Permit Issuance(subject to change/periodic increases) a) Transportation - $13,952.00 b) CD1 Deposit & Fee - $TBD 2) Bus Bay Shelter to be constructed on private property and location to be coordinated with OMNI-Trans a) Remove landscaping and install concrete(full width of Bus Bay to curb) within public right-of-way. b) Prior to.any work being performed in the public right-of-way construction permit # ROW2010-00488 shall be obtained from • the Engineering Services Division (fees apply) prior to Occupancy Release. 3) Drive Through Radius a) Ensure radius will accommodate larger vehicles. • 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2010. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman • ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R.Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, . do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and . adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the • Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 2010, by the following vote-to-wit: D,E,F- 36 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-44 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00314 - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 • Page 5 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • D, E,F- 37 III COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT: DRC2010-00314 APPLICANT: HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL LOCATION: SEC BASE LINE ROAD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE —APN: 1077-011-45 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers,or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such ,approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 10-44, Standard / /_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The / /_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use / /_ has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. • SC-12-08 1 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00314StdCond 10-14.doc D, E, F- 38 Project No.DRC2010-00314 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/ / • site plans,architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/ /_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /_ • consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. • • 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / /_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete • or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For • single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / /_ including proper illumination. D. Shopping Centers 1. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the / /_ Planning Director: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). / /_ b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to / /_ include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. / /_ d. Roll-up doors. e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. / /_ f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. / / • g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed _/_/_ to be hidden from view. • 2 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00314StdCond 10-14.doc D, E, F- 39 • • Project No. DRC2010-00314 Completion Date 2- Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. / / 3. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and / / • debris remain for more than 24 hours. 4. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for"employee parking only." _/_/_ 5. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an _/ / exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading-No person shall cause the loading, unloading,opening,closing,or / / other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m.and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / /_ projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be • painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). • 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles,entrances, -/ / and exits shall be striped per City standards. G. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in / / the case of residential development; shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. • 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00314StdCond 10-14.doc D,E, F-40 — Project No. DRC2010-00314 Completion Date 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within / /_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees -24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking / / • stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. H. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. _/_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: / /_ a. Site/Plot Plan; • b. Foundation Plan; • c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; a Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(DRC2010-00314)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. . Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. / /_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to / /_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / / 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the /_/_ Building and Safety Department. 4 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00314StdCond 10-14.doc D, E, F-41 . • Project No.DRC2010-00314 Completion Date J. Site Development . • 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number(DRC2010-00314). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes,and all other applicable codes,ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. • 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or _/_/_ major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. . 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/ /_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. . 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter). K. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering Use, area, and fire-resistiveness. • 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. / /_ 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas. / / 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. / /_ 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. / / 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. / /_ L. Grading SEE ATTACHED. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails, paseos, landscaped / /_ areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to,curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. • 5 - 1:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010=00314StdCond 10-14.doc - --- - - ' ` ' ' _. D,E, F- 42 • • • Project No.DRC2010-00314 Completion Date 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source / /_ of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and • ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable,safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings,structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / /_ Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Base Line Road X - Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. b. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/ • adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. N. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water,gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _/ /_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. • 6 • . I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00314StdCond 10-14:doc' D,E, F-43 Project No.DRC2010-00314 Completion Date O. General Requirements and Approvals • 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits,a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • P. Security Lighting • 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,with / /_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / / Q. Security Hardware 1. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within / / 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. • 2. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars,metal gates, _/_/_ or alarmed. R. Windows 1. Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. / / 2. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede / /_ entry to burglars. . S. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime /_/_ visibility. T. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and _/_/_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. _/ /_ • 7 - --I>\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00314StdCond 10-14.doc - -- -- • •, - ' D, E, F- 44 _ Project No. DRC2010-00314 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING • CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • • 8 • -I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00314StdCond 10-14.doc D, E,F- 45 " City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2010-00314 jaristi Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 . • S ' T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • GRADING COMMITTEE PROJECT REPORT&RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: DRC2010-00314 Type: Taco Bell Restaurant Location: 9709 Baseline Road Planning Department: MICHAEL SMITH APN: 1077-011-45 Meeting Date: September 14, 2010 By: Matthew Addington VI\/ J Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx No: If NO, see COMMENTS below: PRELIMINARY: GRC: September 14, 2010 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: PC Meeting: G�.. /. u i v By: Note: Building and Safety—Grading will review and comment on future submittals for this project. A) STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning . Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. • • 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3) A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6) The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. • I:SUILDINGIPERMITSIDRC2010-00314 Taco BeiI\DRC2010-00314 Grading Committee Project Report,20100914.doc 1 of5 D, E,F- 46 _ .. - J. City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2010-00314 ( Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. i�v Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 • s M T: (909)477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8) A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water,drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. • 11) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the . adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12) The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the • public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. ' 15) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 16) The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent, Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 17) Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 18) The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. • 1:1BUILDING\PPRMITS\DRC2010-00314 Taco Beif\DRC2010-00314 Grading Committee Project Report,20100914.doc 2of5 D, E,F-47 $ City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2010-00314 Building & Safety Department Rancho o Civic Center a,Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 S+ T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 19) The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 20) This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 21) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 22) Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading . • operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 23) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. B) COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above • I:IBUILDINGIPERMIT51DRC2010-00314 Taco BeinDRC2010.00314 Grading Committee Project Report,201009144oc 3of5 D, E,F- 48 • City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2010-00314 s 1' Building &Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: 1) Please note that at this conceptual level a review of the accessibility access is not performed, It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. 2) Along the gross and net site areas, show the disturbed area on the conceptual grading and drainage plan. 3) Show the building dimensions. 4) The conceptual grading and drainage plan does not match the Architect's demolition plan, sheet A0.3. Please address this issue. • C) SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit for any underground water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMPs). • 2) An HCOC exists for the downstream receiving water. The downstream receiving water (Mill Creek, Prado Area) is experiencing significant degradation of its banks. The project shall implement a volume-based treatment control BMP (retention/detention facility) on each lot. The Storm Water Quality Management Plan and the grading plan must contain an appropriate volume based BMP prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 4) If more than 5,000 square feet of combined asphalt concrete and PCC parking and driveway surface area are removed, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) will be required for this project. Contact the Building and Safety Department for additional direction/information. 5) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 6) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide the to Building and Safety Services Official a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm • I:1BUILDINGIPERMIT51DRC2010-00314 Taco BeI11DRC2010-00314 Grading Committee Project Report, 20100914.doc 4of5 - - . 0, E, F- 49 . - - City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC201D-00314 Building& Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 • . .M T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. D) WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) It is the responsibility of the applicant and the applicant's engineer of record to determine if a category or non-category Water Quality Management Plan will be required for the additional improvements required by the Planning Department. • • • • I:13UILDINGIPERMITSORC2010-00314 Taco BeIIthRC2010-00314 Grading Committee Project Report,20100914.doc 5of5 D,E,F- 50 • „6 ®4 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District At- • Fire Construction Services FL6E STANDARD CONDITIONS September 1, 2010 Taco Bell 9709 Baseline Road DRC2010-00314 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us/fire/index.htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Existing no change FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III- A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 300-feet of the proposed project site. • FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in Group "A” Occupancies with an occupant load greater than 100 persons. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1. The California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code require a listed fire sprinkler monitoring Central Station Fire Alarm system. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of the fire alarm system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access. roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access • Roadways Std #9-7. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the• • building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. D, E, F- 51 - 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. • c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. 1. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. • b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 6. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size • and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. D, E, F-252 • e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. • f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits A public assembly Fire Code permits is required a permit application for approval of the permit must be submitted with the plan check of the building; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1. RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain • access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant — Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. 2. Public Water Supply /Fire) Systems: Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after • acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. D, E,F- 53 3 PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: • • 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 3. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. • The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved .documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 4. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. 5. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho • Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 6. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 'h" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • D,E,F-454 RESOLUTION NO. 10-45 • • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00314D, A PROPOSAL TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING 5,489 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING THAT WAS FORMERLY USED AS A BANK AT 9709 BASE LINE ROAD AND CONSTRUCT A TACO BELL FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THRU OF 2,432 SQUARE FEET AT AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1077-011-45. A. Recitals. 1. HC&D Architects, on behalf of Taco Bell, filed an application for the issuance of Development Review DRC2010-00314D, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of October 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on October 13, 2010, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a shopping center located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue; and b. The shopping center is approximately 376,000 square feet (8.6 acres) and is approximately 610 feet (east to west) by approximately 650 feet (north to south); and c. The specific location of the project site is at the northwest corner of the shopping center near the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road (APN: 1077-011-45). The "area of work" is a parcel of approximately 41,500 square feet (0.95 acre) that is presently developed with a vacant 5,489 square foot building that was previously a bank with drive-thru customer service; and d. The shopping center is bound on the north and west by commercial development • and is bound to the south and east by residential development; and D, E, F- 55 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-45 • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00314D - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 Page 2 • e. The zoning of the shopping center is Neighborhood Commercial(NC) District. The zoning of the properties to the north is Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. The properties to the west are zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District and Office Professional (OP) District. The zoning of the properties to the south and east is Low (L) Residential District; and f. The existing combined gross floor area of the buildings within the shopping center is 99,484 square feet. When the project is completed, the combined gross floor area will be 96,428 • square feet; and g. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing building and in its place construct a fast food restaurant of 2,432 square feet. The proposed restaurant will be situated in the same general area on the site as the existing building; and h. This application is in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00314 and Variance DRC2010-00565; and i. Included in the proposal will be new paving and revisions to the parking area to accommodate vehicle circulation. Forty-two (42) parking stalls will be removed and replaced by twenty (20) new stalls; and j. The shopping center currently has 453 parking stalls of which 448 stalls are . required; the remaining five (5) stalls are excess capacity; and k. When the project is completed, there will be 431 parking stalls as the applicant will • be removing a net total of twenty-two (22) parking stalls. As 434 parking stalls are required, there is a deficiency of three (3) parking stalls. To address this deficiency three (3) new stalls will be restriped at the south side of the shopping center so that the number of parking stalls provided matches the number of parking stall required; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed project is a fast food restaurant. This use is permitted with a Conditional Use Permit in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. The underlying General Plan designation is General Commercial. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is within a shopping center; the proposed land use is consistent with the existing land use and the expectations of the community. The properties to the north of the shopping center are zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District and the properties to the west of the shopping center are zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District and Office Professional (OP) District. The properties to the south and east of the shopping center are zoned Low (L) Residential District. • c. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the • Development Code, except the building and landscape depth along Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue—the applicant has submitted a request for a Variance (Related file: DRC2010-00565) for D, E, F- 56 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00314D - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 • Page 3 the Commission's review and approval. The proposed development,otherwise, meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - as the proposed fast food restaurant is less than 2,500 square feet in gross floor area. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption,and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and.4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. • Planning Department 1) Approval is for the demolition of an existing building of 5,489 square feet and the construction of a fast food restaurant of approximately 2,432 square feet on a parcel of approximately 41,500 square feet • (0.95 acre) within an existing shopping center of approximately 376,000 square feet(8.6 acres) in the Neighborhood Commercial(NC) District, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue - APN: 1077-011-45. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) Three (3) new parking stalls shall be added in the parking area at the south side of 9975 Base Line Road (99 Ranch Market) to address the deficiency in the number of required parking stalls. These stalls shall be striped per City standard. 4) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 5) The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. The maximum height of light standards, including the base, measured from the finished surface is 15 feet. 6) New walls, including retaining walls, shall be constructed of decorative • masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone,or have a decorative finish such as stucco. • • D,E, F- 57 _ • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00314D - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 Page 4 • 7) The Landscape Plan shall comply with Ordinance No. 823 adopted by the City Council on December 2, 2010. All landscaping shall be installed prior to final acceptance of the buildings and/or project site complete and release for occupancy. 8) All groundmounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices, etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. • 9) If Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) are required and/or proposed, they shall be placed 5 feet from the right-of-way and shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. • This wall shall have a decorative finish to match the building. 10) The applicant shall submit a final draft (incorporating any applicable technical corrections to the text, format, etc.) of the amendment to Uniform Sign Program No. 4 (Related file: DRC2010-00404) for the City's records prior to issuance of building permits. All signs shall require review and approval of a separate Sign Permit application by the Planning Director prior to installation. • 11) All Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00314 shall apply. • Engineering Department 1) Development Impact Fees due at Building Permit Issuance (subject to change/periodic increases). a) Transportation - $13,952.00 • b) CD1 Deposit & Fee - $TBD 2) Bus Bay Shelter to be constructed on private property and location to be coordinated with.OMNI-Trans. a) Remove landscaping and install concrete(full width of Bus Bayto curb) within public right-of-way. b) Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way construction permit # ROW2010-00488 shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Division (fees apply)prior to Occupancy Release. 3) Drive Through Radius a) Ensure radius will accommodate larger vehicles. • D, E, F- 58 . _ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00314D - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 • Page 5 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2010. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I,James R.Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 2010, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: • ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • D, E,F- 59 tiljr COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUBJECT: DRC2010-00314D APPLICANT: HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL LOCATION: SEC BASE LINE ROAD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE -APN: 1077-011-45 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/ agents,officers,or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 10-45, Standard / /_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The / /_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X B. Time Limits 1. Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved / /_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. • SC-12-08 1 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00314DStdCond 10-13.doc D, E, F- 60 — Project No. DRC2010-00314D Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / / • site plans,architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / /_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for /_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all /_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete • or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / /_ including proper illumination. D. Shopping Centers 1. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the / /_ Planning Director: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). / /_ b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to / /_ include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. / / d. Roll-up doors. / / e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. / / f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. / / g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed / / to be hidden from view. 2 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00314DStdCond 10-13.doc D, E, F- 61 Project No. DRC2010-00314D Completion Date 2. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. / / • 3. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and / /_ debris remain for more than 24 hours. 4. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." _/_/_ 5. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an / /_ exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m.and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading-No person shall cause the loading, unloading,opening,closing,or / / other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, • in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be • painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main / /_ building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / /_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles,entrances, / /_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. G. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in / / the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. • 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res &Stf Rpt\DRC2010=00314DStdCond 10-13:dob . " ' • D, E, F- 62 . — Project No. DRC2010-00314D Completion Date 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees -24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/ stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the / /_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. H. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. _/_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements . 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/_/_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; • c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(DRC2010-00314D))clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. / /_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to /_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / / 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the / / Building and Safety Department. 4 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00314DStdCond 10-13.doc • D, E, F- 63 . • • Project No. DRC2010-00314D Completion Date J. Site Development • 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (DRC2010-00314D). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or / /_ major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter). K. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/ /_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. • 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. / /_ 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas. _/_/_ 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. _/_/_ 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. _/____J_ 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. _/_/_ L. Grading SEE ATTACHED APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos,landscaped _/_/_ areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to,curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. • 5 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00314DStdCond'10-13:doc .. . ` .. D, E, F- 64 . Project No. DRC2010-00314D Completion Date 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source _/_/_ of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for • which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except:that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb& AC. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike • Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other • Base Line Road X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / /_ • construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. • b. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required N. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water,gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / /_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. • 6 • -1:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCCMM\2010 Res &Stf Rpt\DRC20I0-00314DStdCond 10-13.ddc D, E, F- 65 Project No. DRC2010-00314D Completion Date O. General Requirements and Approvals . • 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits,a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Security Lighting . 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. __/_ Q. Security Hardware 1. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within _/_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. • 2. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, _/_/_ or alarmed. R. Windows 1. Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. / / • 2. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede _/_/_ entry to burglars. S. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / /_ visibility. T. Alarm Systems 1.• Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and / /_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. /_/_ • 7 - ' I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010-Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00314DStdCond 10-13.doc .. D, E, F- 66 . Project No. DRC2010-00314D Completion Date ' APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING • CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 8 • I:\PEANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res &'Stf-Rpt\DRC2010-00314DStdCond 10-13.doC' • _. D,E, F- 67 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2010-00314 Building & Safety Department • . 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • % T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 GRADING COMMITTEE PROJECT REPORT&RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: DRC2010-00314 • Type: Taco Bell Restaurant Location: 9709 Baseline Road Planning Department: MICHAEL SMITH APN: 1077-011-45 �� Meeting Date: September 14, 2010 By: Matthew Addington Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx No: / If NO, see COMMENTS below: PRELIMINARY: GRC: September 14, 2010 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: PC Meeting: ,.F2 I . 24/0 By: Note: Building and Safety—Grading will review and comment on future submittals for this project. A) STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. • 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3) A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. ' 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed . Civil Engineer. 6) The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a ' grading permit. • I:1BUILDINGIPERMITSIDRC2010-00314 Taco BeII\DRC2010-00314 Grading Committee Project Report,20100914.doc - 1 of 5 -- -. D, E, F- 68 . . • City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2010-00314 • - Building & Safety Department V 10500 Civic Center Dr. s Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 in T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8) A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12) The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the • public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. • 13) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. • 15) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code, 16) The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 17) Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. . 18) The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. I:\BUILDINGIPERMITS\DRC2010-00314 Taco Bell\DRC2010-00314 Grading Committee Project Report,20100914.doc • _. . 2 of 5 - -_. . . . - D, E, F- 69 • • :;t-$. City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2010-00314 efreolio Building &Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 S Ile T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 19) The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 20) This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 21) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit 22) Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading • operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 23) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. B) COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above • I:IBUILDING\PERMITSIDRC2010-00314 Taco Bell\DRC2010-00314 Grading Committee Project Report,20100914.doc 3of5 D, E, F- 70 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2010-00314 =1„4,_ Building& Safety Department �' SF 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: 1) Please note that'at this conceptual level a review of the accessibility access is not performed. It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. 2) Along the gross and net site areas, show the disturbed area on the conceptual grading and drainage plan. 3) Show the building dimensions. 4) The conceptual grading and drainage plan does not match the Architect's demolition plan, sheet A0.3. Please address this issue. C) SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit for any underground water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMPs). 2) An HCOC exists for the downstream receiving water. The downstream receiving • water (Mill Creek, Prado Area) is experiencing significant degradation of its banks. The project shall implement a volume-based treatment control BMP (retention/detention facility) on each lot. The Storm Water Quality Management Plan and the grading plan must contain an appropriate volume based BMP.prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 4) If more than 5,000 square feet of combined asphalt concrete and PCC parking and driveway surface area are removed, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) will be required for this project. Contact the Building and Safety Department for additional direction/information. 5) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 6) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide the to Building and Safety Services Official a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review . prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\DRC2010.00314 Taco BeII\ORC2010-00314 Grading Committee Project Report,23100914.doc 4of5 _ D, E, F- 71 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2010-00314 �" Building & SafetyDepartment 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • Z T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. D) WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN • 1) It is the responsibility of the applicant and the applicant's engineer of record to determine if a category or non-category Water Quality Management Plan will be required for the additional improvements required by the Planning Department. • • • • 1:1BUILDINGWERMITSDRC2010.00314 Taco 9eI11DRC2010.00314 Grading Committee Project Report,20100914.doc 5of5 D, E, F- 72 _ • Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District At,' CIT C\ Ve. e • Fire Construction Services FIRE STANDARD CONDITIONS September 1, 2010 Taco Bell 9709 Baseline Road DRC2010-00314 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us/fire/index.htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Existing no change FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of • 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix IR- A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 300-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in Group "A" Occupancies with an occupant load greater than 100 persons. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1. The California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code require a listed fire sprinkler monitoring Central Station Fire Alarm system. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of the fire alarm system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access • Roadways Std #9-7. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the • - • building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. D, E, F- 73 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. • c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. • d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight.(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 • California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When • railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 6. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size • and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. • D,E,F274 e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. • f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits A public assembly Fire Code permits is required a permit application for approval of the permit must be submitted with the plan check of the building; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1. RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement between the • owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant — Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the • issuance of any building permits: 1. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. 2. Public Water Supply /Fire) Systems: Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after • acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. • D, E, F-75 3 PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: • 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 3. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 4. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. • 5. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 6. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 'h" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • D, E, F-476 • • RESOLUTION NO. 10-46 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2010-00565 A REQUEST TO ALLOW AN ENCROACHMENT INTO THE REQUIRED STREET SETBACKS ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND .BASE LINE ROAD IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSAL TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING 5,489 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING THAT WAS FORMERLY USED AS A. BANK LOCATED AT 9709 BASE LINE ROAD AND CONSTRUCT A TACO BELL FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THRU OF 2,432 SQUARE FEET AT AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 077-011-45. A. Recitals. 1. HC&D Architects, on behalf of Taco Bell, filed an application for the issuance of Variance DRC2010-00565 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of October 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 13, 2010, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application is related to Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00314 and Development Review DRC2010-00314D; and b. The application applies to a shopping center located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue; and c. The shopping center is approximately 376,000 square feet (8.6 acres) and is approximately 610 feet (east to west) by approximately 650 feet (north to south); and • d. The specific location of the project site is at the northwest corner of the shopping center near the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road (APN: 1077-011-45). The "area of work" is a parcel of approximately 41,500 square feet (0.95 acre) that is presently D, E,E- 77 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-46 VARIANCE DRC2010-00565 — HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL • October 13, 2010 Page 2 developed with a vacant 5,489 square foot building that was previously a bank with drive-thru customer service; and e. The shopping center is bound on the north and west by commercial development and is bound to the south and east by residential development; and f. The zoning of the shopping center is Neighborhood Commercial (NC)District. The zoning of the properties to the north is Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. The properties to the west are zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District and Office Professional (OP) District. The zoning of the properties to the south and east is Low (L) Residential District; and g. The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a reduced building setback and landscape depth along both Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue; and h. Per Table 17.10.040-B of the Development Code,the required building setback on Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue is 45 feet; and i. Per Table 17.10.040-B of the Development Code, the required landscape depth Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue 45 feet, with an average of 30 feet; and j. All street frontage setbacks are measured from the curbface; and • k. The applicant's proposed fast food restaurant will have a building setback of 39 feet on Base Line Road and 38 feet on Archibald Avenue; and I. The landscape depth will be 20 feet on Base Line Road and 37 feet on Archibald Avenue. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed restaurant will be located at the northwest corner of an existing shopping center. The"project area" is generally defined by the property lines of the parcel on which the restaurant will be located. Although the restaurant will replace an existing building at this location, there are improvements just beyond the project area that will remain in-place and, therefore, restrict options available to the applicant to comply with setback requirements. There is an east to west drive aisle to the south and a north to south drive aisle to the east of the respective south and east limits of the work area. These drive aisles link the parking lot of the shopping center with the respective drive entrances at Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road. These features cannot be modified without negatively affecting vehicle circulation within the shopping center. Furthermore, these features are outside the applicant's limit of work. As an alternative, the building and the corresponding parking area and drive aisle for the restaurant could be shifted south and • east. However, doing so would require the elimination or reduction in the dimensions of at least one of the following three features that will be constructed or installed along the south of the project area: D, E, F- 78 __ • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-46 VARIANCE DRC2010-00565 — HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 Page 3 a) the new drive aisle, b) the row of sixteen (16) parking stalls, and c) the landscape area. None of these can be reduced nor eliminated without violating other sections of the Development Code. b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. All new development, is required to comply with the City's architectural standards. These standards include requiring features such as tower elements at primary entrances and articulated wall planes. The proposed restaurant will have a tower element and a canopy on the west and north elevations, respectively, of the building. As the project site is approximately 0.95 acre in area, opportunities for different designs are limited — the project as proposed represents the 'best fit'for the site. Although these features could be removed,this would result in a building that would not comply with the City's design standards and policies. The proposed restaurant replaces a building that was within the building setbacks and had a drive-thru lane that was within the landscape depth setback. The applicant will replace this building with a smaller building and utilize the existing drive-thru lane. The applicant cannot increase the landscape depth without affecting the existing improvements surrounding the project site that are beyond the applicant's scope of work. The locations of the existing drive aisles cannot be altered without affecting the circulation patterns within the shopping center, and the drive approaches cannot be shifted without affecting access. • c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. Based on a review of an aerial photo and site inspection, there are other buildings in the immediate vicinity that are within the building and landscape setbacks: Hanmi Bank at 9759 Base Line Road; Union 76 gas station at 7287 Archibald Avenue; US Bank at 9696 Base Line Road; and Urgent Care Center at 9695 Base Line Road. With the exception of Hanmi Bank, all of the cited buildings are adjacent to the intersection of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue. The proposed restaurant will replace a building that was formerly a bank. That building also encroached into the building and landscape setbacks. The proposal includes both a canopy at the drive-thru window and a drive-thru lane that will be at the same general location as the similar features that were utilized by the former bank. d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. The proposal is an in-fill project. There is a shopping center that surrounds the project site that restricts flexibility on the design of the restaurant, the arrangement and location of the corresponding parking area, and the location and quantity of landscaping. There are no practical alternatives, i.e. relocating features of the project will affect other aspects of the project, such as the architecture of the building and the location of the drive-thru lane. Furthermore, the width of the drive aisles, landscaped planter areas, and parking stalls, as proposed, meet minimum technical standards. Any adjustments will negatively alter these other improvements. Although requests for Variances for encroachments into setbacks are not common, they are granted when surrounding improvements or other City requirements restrict alternate options. • e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project has been designed to take into account the orientation of the restaurant in relation to the adjoining tenants D,E, F- 79 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. xx-xx VARIANCE DRC2010-00565 - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 Page 4 • within the surrounding shopping center, the location of the existing improvements, parking, regular and emergency access; and overall usability. The granting of this Variance will not affect the characteristics of the surrounding community. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEOA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - as the proposed fast food restaurant is less than 2,500 square feet in gross floor area. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the encroachment into the required setbacks for a fast food restaurant of approximately 2,432 square feet on a parcel of approximately 41,500 square feet (0.95 acre) within an existing shopping center of approximately 376,000 square feet (8.6 acres) in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, located at the southeast • corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue-APN: 1077-011-45. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) All Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00314 and Development Review DRC2010-00314D shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2010 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: • Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary • D,E,F- 80 . • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. xx-xx VARIANCE DRC2010-00565 - HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL October 13, 2010 Page 5 • I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 2010 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • D, E,F- 81 it COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT y DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: VARIANCE SUBJECT: DRC2010-00565 APPLICANT: HC&D ARCHITECTS FOR TACO BELL LOCATION: SEC BASE LINE ROAD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE -APN: 1077-011-45 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees,because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 10-46, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/ /_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director,hearing: a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X B. Time Limits 1. Variance approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not / /_ commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. • SC-12-08 1 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res &Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00565StdCond 10-13.doc D, E, F- 82 Project No. DRC2010-00565 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / / site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be /_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ! /_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. • • • • • 2 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00565StdCond 10-13.doc D,E,F- 83 .