Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2013/05/01 - Agenda Packet
city of / 1/ri1r11. L 10 CL) L,rIL LVi t, 10500 Civic Center Drive O Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS ist and 31d Wednesdays � 7:00 P.M. MAY 19 2013 ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room................. 5:00 P.M. Call to Order Public Communications Conduct of Closed Session City Manager Announcements REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers.......................... 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS MAYOR L. Dennis Michael MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Spagnolo COUNCIL MEMBERS William Alexander Marc Steinorth Diane Williams CITY MANAGER John R. Gillison CITY ATTORNEY James L. Markman fFIF CITY CLERK Janice C. Reynolds - INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board,Authority Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate,a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board,Authority Board or City Council byfilling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. If as part of your presentation, you would like to display audio or visual material, please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences. Any handouts for the Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During"Public Communications,"your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period,all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items)will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any remaining "Public Communications" which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less,as deemed necessary by the Chair,depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" Item or on an "Administrative Hearing Item(s)," your name will be called when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS-Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter,the City's Public Library(-ies)and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST-Fire Board,Authority Board and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on- demand"from their computers. The added feature of"Streaming Video On Demand"is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhalUcouncil/videos.aspfor those with Hi-bandwidth(DSL/Cable Modem)or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Fire Board, Authority Board and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire District Board and the Public Financing Authority Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.citvofrc.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 19 2013 A. 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM 1. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Steinorth and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE CITY COUNCIL. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM D1. CONSIDERATION OF WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(B) -CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13349 BASELINE AVENUE, 13451 BASELINE AVENUE, AND 13479 BASELINE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 1100-771-02, -03, AND -09; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, PACIFIC/COSTANZO/ LEWIS- FONTANA, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT - CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13539 BASELINE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 1100-771-01; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, TESORO SIERRA PROPERTIES, LLC, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT- CITY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 1 , 2013 D4. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7391 EAST AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 1100-771-08; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, RICHARD P. CHADO, DARLENE L. CHADO AND ANTHONY C. CHADO, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT-CITY D5. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7175 GREEN GLEN COURT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-012-01; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNER, JAMES M. TAMAYO SR., AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT- CITY D6. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7211 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-51; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, GAMERO FAMILY TRUST, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT- CITY D7. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7221 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-52; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNER, DINAH PIERSON, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT- CITY D8. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13079 FALLING OAK DRIVE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-55; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, VICTOR CAMPOS AND ROSENDA PEREZ, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT - CITY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 19 2013 D9. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13089 FALLING OAK DRIVE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-54; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, GERALD LOPEZ AND DANNELLE R. CARPIO, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT - CITY D10. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7201 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-50; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, SATINJERIT S. BHATTI AND SIMRIT BHATTI, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT - CITY D11. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7231 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-53; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNER, CARLOS A. LANDINO, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT- CITY E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND q CITY COUNCIL AGENDA :MONGA MAY 19 2013 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Steinorth and Williams H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Proclamation declaring May, 2013 as Lupus Awareness Month. H2. Proclamation declaring May, 2013 as Water Awareness Month. H3. Presentation to the Hearts for Animal Club at Rancho Cucamonga High School for their support of the Animal Care and Services Center. H4. Presentation recognizing City of Rancho Cucamonga's Complete Streets Policy . H5. Local History Night—May 10, 2013 H6. Proclamation declaring May "National Physical Fitness and Sports Month" Community Activities. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Public Finance Authority Board and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Public Finance Authority Board and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board, Public Finance Authority Board and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 15 2013 The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Fire Board/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J1. Approval of Minutes: April 17,2013 (Special Meeting) April 17,2013(Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated April 10, 2013 through April 23, 2013 for the total amount of$691,812.03. J3. Fire Agencies Insurance Risk Authority(FAIRA) Board of Directors election. 7 J4. Release of Faithful Performance Bond held in lieu of a Maintenance Guarantee Bond, in g the amount of $2,871,000.46, for the Hellman Fire Station (177) construction project, Contract No. FD10-006. J5. Approval of amended Fiscal Year 2012113 Appropriations. 11 K. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY K1. Approval of Minutes: April 17, 2013 (Regular Meeting) L. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL L1. Approval of Minutes: April 17, 2013 (Regular Meeting) L2. Approval of Check Register dated April 10, 2013 through April 23, 2013 and payroll ending 40 April 23,2013 for the total amount of$3,777,155.07. L3. Authorization to advertise the"Notice Inviting Bids"for the Central Park Pavilion Project. 78 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND g CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 15 2013 RESOLUTION NO. 13-044 80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "FREEDOM COURTYARD PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS L4. Release of Faithful Performance Bond held in lieu of a Maintenance Guarantee Bond, in 84 the amount of $36,826.00, for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Celebration Hall Flooring Project, Contract No. 11-074. L5. Authorization to purchase upgraded computer forensics analysis workstation for the Police 85 Department from Forensic Computers, Inc. in the amount of $37,766.52 as a sole source vendor and authorization to appropriate $37,766.52 State Asset Seizure Funds into Account Number 1195701-5605 (Capital Outlay-Computer Equipment). L6. Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $45,000 awarded by the California 98 Emergency Management Agency (FY 2010 Homeland Security Grant-Amended), and administered by the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Office of Emergency Services to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District into Account Number 1380000- 4740 (Grant Income); and authorization to appropriate $45,000 into Account Number 1380501-5207 for the purchase of a Regional (West End JPA) Amateur Radio Redundant Digital Data Emergency Communications Project. L7. Accept the bids received and award the base bid and authorize the execution of the 100 contract in the amount of $477,756.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, Laird Construction Company, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $47,775.60, for the Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation —Overlay of Various Streets project to be funded from Gas Tax RT7360 Funds, Account Number 1174303-5650/1022174-0 and appropriate an additional amount of$192,000.00 to Account Number 1174303-5650/1022174-0 from Gas Tax RT7360 Fund balance. L8. Accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the 106 amount of $327,858.75, to the lowest responsive bidder, All American Asphalt, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $32,785.88, for the Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation — Slurry Seal of Various Streets project to be funded from Gas Tax RT7360 Funds and Proposition 42 Funds, Account Numbers 1174303-5650/1022174-0 and 1190303-5650/1022190-0 respectively and appropriate an additional amount of $209,900.00 to Account Number 1190303- 5650/1022190-0 from Proposition 42 Fund balance. L9. Approval of agreement for landscape maintenance within State highway right-of-way on 109 Route 1-15 within the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) for maintenance of landscape improvements related to the Interstate 15 at Base Line Road Interchange Improvement project. L10. Approve and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount 119 of $100,000.00 to Richard Heath and Associates, Inc. for Energy Conservation Audits and to implement a customer direct installation program for Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility customers to be funded from Account Number 17063035300 Utility Public Benefit Fund. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, A PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 7 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 19 2013 L11. Release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16227-1, located on the north side of 160 Day Creek Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Meritage Homes of California, Inc. L12. Approval of Utility Agreement Number 22727 with Southern California Edison for relocation 162 of utilities related to the Interstate 15 at Base Line Road Interchange Improvement Project. L13. Authorization to increase the annual expenditure for the procurement of batteries from 168 Interstate Battery of Alta Loma, California. L14. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Deer Creek 169 Channel Bike Trail Improvements from Base Line Road to Highland Avenue to be funded from Safe Routes to School and Beautification Funds. RESOLUTION NO. 13-056 171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO HIGHLAND AVENUE" PROJECT, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 175 L15. Approval of amended Fiscal Year 2012/13 Appropriations. L16. Approval to receive and file Animal Center statistics for February and March 2013. 249 L17. Approval of an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San 251 Bernardino County Flood Control District regarding the payment of the pass through agreement fund balance and a reimbursement for the East Avenue storm drain. L18. Approval of a Resolution committing the City to a minimum 25% local match of total 256 construction costs for a Transportation Development Act Article 3 grant to fund the Pacific Electric Trail Connection Project. RESOLUTION NO. 13-058 257 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COMMITTING THE CITY TO A MINIMUM 25% LOCAL MATCH OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL CONNECTION PROJECT M. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The President will open the meeting to receive public testimony. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND g CITY COUNCIL AGENDA a.010r6CaMUN6A MAY 19 2013 M1. Adoption of a Resolution making determinations regarding the proposed annexation of 258 territory (Water Mill Homes, Owner — APN 1089-081-16,17,20&21 - Annexation No. 11-2) located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street to an existing Community Facilities District, calling a special election and authorizing submittal of levy of special taxes to the qualified electors. RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-019 261 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 11-2) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY M2. Adoption of a Resolution making determinations regarding the proposed annexation of 269 territory (Robert & Heather Radford, Owners — APN 0227-732-01 - Annexation No. 13-1) located on the east side of East Avenue and south of the 1-210 Freeway to an existing Community Facilities District, calling a special election and authorizing submittal of levy of special taxes to the qualified electors. RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-020 272 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 13-1) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. N1. Consideration of a Resolution to decrease City-owned streetlight electric rates within the 280 Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area, pursuant to the requirements and authority of Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND g CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 15 2013 RESOLUTION NO. 13-045 282 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO DECREASE STREETLIGHT ELECTRIC RATES, PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. N2. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ANNUAL 284 ACTION PLAN — DRC2013-00297 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — A review of the Federally required 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan, which includes the selection of CDBG- funded activities, based on an estimated grant allocation of $762,605. N3. Consideration of adoption of Resolutions of Necessity for the acquisition by eminent 355 domain of portions of certain real property interests for public purposes in connection with the Interstate 15 and Base Line Road Interchange Project in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. RESOLUTION NO. 13-046 397 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13079 FALLING OAK DRIVE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0227-693-55, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA. RESOLUTION N0. 13-047 412 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13539 BASELINE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1100- 771-01, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 10 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 19 2013 RESOLUTION NO. 13-048 426 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7211 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0227- 693-51, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA. RESOLUTION NO. 13-049 437 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7231 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0227- 693-53, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA. RESOLUTION NO. 13-050 448 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7201 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0227- 693-50, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA. RESOLUTION NO. 13-051 459 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13449 BASELINE AVENUE, 13451 BASELINE AVENUE, AND 13479 BASELINE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1100- 771-02,-03, AND -09, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 11 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 19 2013 RESOLUTION NO. 13-052 474 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7391 EAST AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1100-771- 08, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA. RESOLUTION NO. 13-053 489 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7175 GREEN GLEN COURT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0227-012-01, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA. RESOLUTION NO. 13-054 503 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7221 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0227- 693-52, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA. RESOLUTION NO. 13-055 514 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13089 FALLING OAK DRIVE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0227-693-54, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 12 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 15 2013 O. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM CITY COUNCIL Speaker cards may be submitted for all those who wish to speak on the following topic(s). The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals wishing to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council, not to members of the audience. 01. Approval of a Resolution establishing a Lactation Accommodation Policy and Program. 527 RESOLUTION NO. 13-057 530 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A LACTATION ACCOMODATION POLICY AND PROGRAM P. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT The following item has no legal publication or posting requirements. P1. Healthy RC and Community Champions Resident Leadership Program Presentation (Oral ----- Report) P2. Video Presentation of the Community Services Department's Annual Report. ----- Q. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. Q1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) R. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING S. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra L. McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 25, 2013, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. April 17 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District convened in the Tri- Communities Room at the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. President L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 2:31 p.m. Present were Board Members: Bill Alexander, Marc Steinorth, Diane Williams, Vice President Sam Spagnolo and President L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; City Attorney James Markman; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Fire Chief Mike Bell; Deputy Fire Chief Mike Costello; Deputy Fire Chief Don Cloughesy; Battalion Chief Ivan Rojer; Sandy Carnes, EMS Administrator; Breanna Medina, Management Analyst II; Kelley Donaldson, Public Information Officer; Rob Ball, Fire Marshal; and Debra McNay, Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS No communication was made from the public. C. ITEM FOR DISCUSSION C1. Report on the Prevention Bureau and Discussion of Permit and Inspection Fees Rob Ball, Fire Marshal, presented the staff report. Board Member Bill Alexander inquired of the City Attorney the potential risk to the District on the characterization of these fees as new taxes. In response, City Attorney James Markman indicated that his . office has researched this and didn't know why the Board could not direct the non-collection of permit fees. In response to Board Member Diane Williams, City Manager John Gillison confirmed that time and motion studies are performed in order to determine the appropriate charge of the permit. Fire Marshal Ball addressed Vice President Sam Spagnolo and spoke about how this decision would be communicated to the business community. Also discussed was the remedies available to the District should a business choose not to comply with the permit requirements. President L. Dennis Michael noted the need to market this change to the business community. Discussion was held. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Alexander, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff report. Motion carried 5-0. C2. Update and discussion of Emergency Communications and Dispatch services provided by Consolidated Fire Agencies of the East Valley(ConFire) Deputy Fire Chief Mike Costello and Battalion Chief Ivan Rojer presented the staff report. * DRAFT * Special Meeting - April 17, 2013 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Minutes - Page 1 of 2 In response to President L. Dennis Michael, it was noted that the bylaws provide for the consent of all JPA members. If a member disagrees, the bylaws provide that a reason must be provided. Chief Mike Bell noted to President Michael that the buy-in fee could be paid over a five year period or all at once. Based on the District's current financial situation, he recommended that the fee be paid in full. Board Member Bill Alexander indicated the goal to include the surrounding cities in the emergency communications and dispatch services. Chief Bell concurred with this goal and noted that this goal is being discussed by ConFire. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo, to authorize the Fire Chief to begin the process of attending membership with the consolidated Fire Agencies of the East Valley. Motion carried 5-0. C3. Hands only CPR— Demonstration Sandy Cames, EMS Administrator, presented the staff report. Manikins were provided and the Fire Protection District Board and staff participated in hands only CPR. C4. Approval to accept $100,000 from Inland Counties Emergency Medical Agency (ICEMA) and authorize staff to redistribute this amount to identified first responder agencies to assist in offsetting a portion of the cost of the purchase of Electronic Patient Care Reporting (ePCR) hardware in accordance with the agreement between American Medical Response and Inland Counties Emergency Medical Agency; and authorize the appropriation of $7,630 into account numbers 3288000-4905 (Contributions) and 3288501-5200 (Operations and Maintenance)for the District's share of the funding Fire Chief Mike Bell presented the staff report. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo, to adopt the recommendations in the staff report. Motion carried 5-0. C5. Introduction of Ready RC Program and brochure (Oral Report) Breanna Medina, Management Analyst II Emergency Preparedness, presented the Ready RC Program and brochure. President Michael and members of the Board complimented the Ready RC Program and the staff who worked on it. D. ADJOURNMENT President L. Dennis Michael adjourned the meeting at 4:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McNay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: * DRAFT * Special Meeting - April 17, 2013 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Minutes - Page 2 of 2 April 17,2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Fire Protection District held a closed session on Wednesday, April 17, 2013 in the Tapia Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor/President L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members/Board Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Marc Steinorth, Vice President/Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and President/Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; City Attorney James Markman, Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services and Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) The following closed session items were considered: D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR CHRIS PAXTON PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FIRE MANAGEMENT GROUP AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTER ASSOCIATION LOCAL 227—FIRE D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A): BEAR GULCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, DBA BEAR GULCH, INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; AND DOES 1 TO 100. CASE NUMBER: CIVRS 1203421 - CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(B) — CITY C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No persons were present wishing to speak. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements were made. F. RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:30 p.m. with no action taken. G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—April 17, 2013 - Page 1 of 10 The meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Financing Authority and City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. President/Chairman/Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Board Members/Board Members/Council Members: Bill Alexander, Marc Steinorth, Diane Williams, Vice PresidentlVice Chairman/Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and President/Chairman/Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services; Trang Huynh, Building & Safety Services Director; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director; Nettie Neilson, Community Services Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Services Director; Mike Newcombe, Police Chief; Veronica Fincher, Animal Care and Services Director; Debra McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager and Adrian Garcia, Assistant City Clerk. H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Recognition of Michelle Perera, Assistant Library Director Being Named by Library Journal as a 2013`Mover and Shaker". Mayor Michael presented a certificate of recognition to Michelle Perera and congratulated her for being a 2013"Mover and Shaker" in the Library Journal. H2. Proclamation Declaring April 14—20 2013 National Library Week Mayor Michael presented a proclamation declaring April 14—20, 2013 as National Library Week to the Friends of the Library. The Friends of the Library presented the City with a check for$25,000. H3. Announcement of Pay it Forward Day, April 25, 2013, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Mayor Michael presented a proclamation to Deloris Faheem declaring April 25, 2013 as Pay it Forward Day. H4. Recognition of the Silver Fox Follies and Star Performers Programs directed by volunteer Ric Morris. Mayor Michael presented a certificate of recognition to Ric Morris and commended him on his achievements. H5. Presentation recognizing the City for ranking #1 from Let's Movel Cities, Towns and Counties. Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst 11, announced that the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been recognized in the Let's Move! Initiative. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. Jesse Kreider noted that he was previously employed at the Animal Care and Services Center and was terminated by the City after speaking out at the January Council meeting. He wondered why the other employees involved in the matter were allowed to keep their jobs. By not acting on this the City is sending a message that people shouldn't speak out against inappropriate acts. 12. Allison Kreider indicated that she is married to Jesse. She noted that Jesse is a Navy veteran and met or exceeded expectations on previous performance evaluations. She inquired if Heather would be rewarded with a full promotion. Since there is only one full time male employee left at the Center, Mrs. Kreider noted that this is a case of discrimination. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—April 17, 2013 - Page 2 of 10 13. Susan Keithly indicated that Freedom Courtyard was dedicated on January 12th and Mr. Kreider stood before the City Council on January 16th. She noted that the sign was clearly visible the day the volunteers were terminated. Ms. Keithly stated that the kill rate is 46% and stressed that the terminated volunteers are committed to helping the animals. 14. Dana Keithly noted that she was one of the dismissed volunteers. She noted that Mr. Kreider was very professional and kind to the volunteers. Ms. Keithly saw the Steinorth sign on November 11th and again on November 15th and stated that the sign was not removed until Council Member Steinorth came to the Center. Ms. Keithly noted that the dismissed volunteers and Mr. Kreider have a first amendment right to free speech and the right to demand that the City correct the wrong that was done. 15. Melissa Schweigert stated that she attended the volunteer orientation at the Animal Care and Services Center. There is a new policy requiring volunteers to be interviewed and fingerprinted. Ms. Schweigert did not understand why this is needed and noted that it restricts people from volunteering at the Center. It will take two or three months before she is approved to walk dogs. 16. Vicky Reust noted that she received the Foster Parent of the Year award last year. She read some of the reasons that the volunteers were dismissed. 17. Dr. William B. Martin 11 spoke about the importance of the National Day of Prayer. This year's event will be held on May 2, 2013 from noon to 2:00 p.m. at the Bank of America courtyard. 18. Victoria Jones invited the City Council and the audience to the 8th Annual Cucamonga Challenge, which will be held on May 11, 2013 at Central Park. 19. Janet Walton spoke about the National Day of Prayer and offered a prayer for the City Council and the audience. 110. Teresa Akahoshi invited the City Council and the audience to the Outback Steakhouse fundraiser on May 13, 2013, noting the proceeds will benefit the programs offered at the Animal Care and Services Center. Also there is a free microchip day on May 18, 2013 from 10 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at the Center. At that time, residents who have not yet licensed their dogs can do so without penalty. Ms. Akahoshi announced that $4,795 was raised from the Furry Friends Flea Market. 111. Matt Rogers noted that he is in the entertainment industry, indicated that his son has been diagnosed with cystic fibrosis and spoke about an upcoming fundraiser at the Cucamonga Brewing Company to benefit cystic fibrosis. 112. Ryan Orr spoke about Operation Community Cares, which provides deployed military with tokens from home. He requested the audience's assistance in furnishing the names and addresses of friends and family members in the armed forces. Mr. Orr noted that supplies will be boxed up on June 15, 2013 from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. He also noted that the L.A. County Fair is seeking nominations for community heroes. 113. Jim Moffat indicated that people are speaking about the activity at the Animal Care and Services Center at every meeting. He wondered why volunteers are being fired. 114. Victor Muniz displayed a newsletter announcing the upcoming vote in LIVID #2 and noted a Brown Act issue with this person knowing something the residents know nothing about. Mr. Muniz indicated that the proposed ballot should be disclosed prior to taking action on this matter. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—April 17, 2013- Page 3 of 10 115. Ondra Gilbertson spoke about a Great Dane that was put down for temperament issues. She requested that a committee be formed for temperament testing. Ms. Gilbertson noted that there are not a lot of animals at the Center and pointed out that it will take months for volunteers to be utilized due to the new procedures. The four volunteers that were dismissed were dedicated walkers for the large dogs and now many large dogs are not being walked. Mr. Kreider is a very compassionate man. Ms. Gilbertson asked the City Council to uncover the facts. 116. John Lyons attended the Furry Friends Flea Market and encouraged the residents to take advantage of the Center's amnesty program. He indicated that his dog, Crunch, has benefitted from the microchip program and Mr. Lyons has had a good relationship with the Animal Care and Services Center. Regarding the assessment in Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Mr. Lyons noted that this is not a tax but rather a fee for service. An election is needed as the law has changed. 117. Stacy Holmes reported that she visited the Animal Care and Services Center on Monday to adopt a dog. She was surprised at the questions that were asked and the requirement to bring in the family and other household pets. Ms. Holmes heard a staff member advise another family against adopting a cat. She was disappointed and visited the Riverside animal center. Ms. Holmes had a completely different experience and adopted a dog there. 118. Kelly Heilig urged the City Council to do something about the Center. She noted that the employee who spoke up and the dismissed volunteers were very courageous. Many years ago, the residents did a lot to ensure that the Center would be a no-kill facility. Ms. Keilig suggested that an independent committee investigate the matter. 119. Nicole Myerchin noted that they had dealt with a similar situation when animal care was under County control. She suggested that Nathan be approached again in order to adopt the no-kill policy as the City standard. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J1. Approval of Minutes: April 3, 2013 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated March 27, 2013 through April 9, 2013 for the total of $74,576.20. J3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 2013. J4. Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids"for the remediation and demolition services for the properties at 9547 and 9561 San Bernardino Road. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—April 17, 2013- Page 4 of 10 RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE REMEDIATION AND DEMOLITION SERVICES FOR THE PROPERTIES AT 9547 AND 9561 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS J5. Adoption of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 88-1, Annexation No. 88-13-1 located on the northeast side of Specter Court and Archibald Avenue and ordering the annexation of such property to Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (Cardenas Family Trust, Owner—APN: 0201-043-64). RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-016 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ANNEXATION NO. 88-13-1 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 J6. Adoption of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 88-1, Annexation No. 88-13-2 located on the northeast corner of Banyan Street and Indigo Avenue and ordering the annexation of such property to Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (Randy&Julie Twist, Owners—APN: 1043-151-22). RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ANNEXATION NO. 88-13-2 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. K. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY K1. Approval of Minutes: April 3, 2013 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo, to approve the minutes of the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. L. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL 1-1. Approval of Minutes: April 3, 2013 (Special and Regular Meetings) * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—April 17, 2013- Page 5 of 10 L2. Approval of Check Register dated March 27, 2013 through April 9, 2013 and payroll ending April 9, 2013 for the total of$5,211,296.09. L3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 2013. L4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the FY 2012/2013 Bus Stops/Pads at Various Locations project to be funded from Proposition 42 and Pedestrian Grant, Article 3 Funds. RESOLUTION NO. 13-038 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "FY 2012/2013 BUS STOPS/PADS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS" PROJECT, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS L5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Soh Street Pavement Rehabilitation — from 1300' east of Hellman Avenue to 200' west of Hermosa Avenue, to be funded from Measure I Fund, Account No. 1177-3035650/1798177-0 for construction of said project. RESOLUTION NO. 13-039 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "8ii, STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION — FROM 1300' EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE TO 200' WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS L6. Approval of Agreement for acquisition of real property and joint escrow instructions with Rozana Rivera aka Roxana Rivera and Juan Rivera for the acquisition of right of way located at 7195 Acorn Place (APN 0227-693-49) needed for the 1-15 at Base Line Road / Base Line Avenue Interchange Improvements project. L7. City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility 10-Year Energy Efficiency Portfolio Plan as required by Assembly Bill 2021 (AB 2021). L8. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, approving a Resolution and a Program Supplement Agreement No. 014-N to Administering Agency- State Agreement No. 08-5420R for a Safe Routes to School Education Grant and authorizing the City Manager to execute agreement with the California Department of Transportation for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Safe Routes to School Education Grant. RESOLUTION NO. 13-041 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A RESOLUTION AND A PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT NO. 014-N TO ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5420R FOR A SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL EDUCATION GRANT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL EDUCATION GRANT * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—April 17, 2013- Page 6 of 10 L9. Approval of a Joint Trade agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Rancho Cucamonga High School for Waiver of Rental Fees Associated with Graduation Ceremonies at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter in Exchange for City Use of the Rancho Cucamonga High School Gymnasium for the City's Youth Basketball Program for January 1, 2013—January 1, 2015. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. M. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinance has been introduced for first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. The Fire Board or Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by a Board Member,or Council Member. M1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-00097 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Table 17.38.040-1 in Article III of the Development Code in order to conditionally permit attended carwashes within the Haven Overlay District to perform Quick Lube services and to implement distance requirements to limit the number of carwashes within the Haven Avenue Overlay District as well as increase the existing separation requirements for Service Stations. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 859 (SECOND READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-00097, A REQUEST TO AMEND TABLE 17.38.040-1 IN ARTICLE III OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ORDER TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT ATTENDED CARWASHES WITHIN THE HAVEN OVERLAY DISTRICT TO PERFORM QUICK LUBE SERVICES AND TO IMPLEMENT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF CARWASHES WITHIN THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT AS WELL AS INCREASE THE EXISTING SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SERVICE STATIONS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. The Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager read the title of Ordinance No. 859. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Steinorth, to approve Ordinance No. 859 for second reading. Motion carried 5-0. N. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS - CITY The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. N1. Healthy RC Youth Leaders Presentation (Oral Report) Ruben Brambila, Project Manager for the Healthy RC Kids, and the Healthy RC Youth Leaders, presented the staff report. Mayor Michael requested that Item N4 be heard at this time.The remaining items were heard in the order listed on the agenda and the minutes indicate the actions taken. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—April 17, 2013- Page 7 of 10 N2. Presentation by Cucamonga Valley Water District about the water treatment project on Etiwanda. (Oral Report) Edwardo Espinoza, Senior Engineer from the Cucamonga Valley Water District, presented information about the Etiwanda water treatment project. N3. Presentation of SANBAG 101 Video. (Oral Report) Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst showed the SANBAG 101 Video. N4. Presentation on the 1-10/1-15 Corridor Managed Lanes Project by San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) Staff. (Oral Report) Gary Cohoe, SANBAG Director of Project Delivery, presented information on the 1-10/1-15 Corridor Managed Lanes Project. N5. A Resolution of the City Council preliminarily approving the Assessment Engineers Report, declaring its intention to increase assessments for Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2) and to provide for the levy and collection of annual assessments in said District, setting a time and place for a public hearing, and ordering the initiation of Assessment Ballot procedures. RESOLUTION NO. 13-040 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO INCREASE ASSESSMENTS FOR VICTORIA NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (LMD 2) AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS IN SAID DISTRICT, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON AND ORDERING THE INITIATION OF ASSESSMENT BALLOT PROCEDURES Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services, and Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director, presented the staff report. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to adopt Resolution No. 13-040. Motion carried 5-0. O. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT - JOINT CITY, FIRE DISTRICT AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY ITEM The following item has no legal publication or posting requirements. 01. Adoption of Resolutions to authorize the Submission of Assessment Ballots on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Agency, and the Successor Agency to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency in the proceedings to increase Assessments for the Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2). * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—April 17, 2013- Page 8 of 10 RESOLUTION NO. 13-042 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT ASSESSMENT BALLOTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENTS FOR VICTORIA NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (LIVID 2) AND PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE SUBMISSION OF SAID ASSESSMENT BALLOTS RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT ASSESSMENT BALLOT ON BEHALF OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENTS FOR VICTORIA NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (LIVID 2) AND PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE SUBMISSION OF SAID ASSESSMENT BALLOTS RESOLUTION NO. 13-043 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT ASSESSMENT BALLOTS ON BEHALF OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENTS FOR VICTORIA NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (LIVID 2) AND PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE SUBMISSION OF SAID ASSESSMENT BALLOTS Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services, presented the staff report. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to adopt Resolution No. 13-042. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander, to adopt Resolution No. FD 13-018. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo, to adopt Resolution No 13-043. Motion carried 5-0. P. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. P1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) Council Member Williams reported on the recent Southern California Association of Governments Environmental and Energy Committee meeting. At this meeting, the members heard the preliminary budget, transit-oriented development, environmental mitigation. Council Member Williams also attended a San Bernardino Associated Governments meeting, where the * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—April 17, 2013- Page 9 of 10 members heard a presentation on the HOV/express lanes, the County vision and a preliminary budget. Lastly, she reported on her attendance at a Local Agency Formation Commission meeting where they considered policies on snow removal and road maintenance, as well as the preliminary budget. Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo reported that he is attending the VTrans Board meetings as the Omnitrans representative. At this meeting, the members heard about the contractual arrangement with San Bernardino Associated Governments, insurance and transportation issues. Council Member Steinorth referenced the comments made under Public Communications and noted that he remains unbiased and impartial in his decisions. Council Member Alexander also referenced the comments made under Public Communications. He noted the need to look at everything very carefully. Regarding Landscape Maintenance District #2, Council Member Alexander stressed the need to make sure that the information is transparent and fully presented to the community. City Attorney Markman noted that the comments made tonight were regarding personnel actions and investigations. While staff cannot respond to the comments, the speakers are free to make allegations. Mr. Markman indicated that his firm investigated the matter at the time and noted that there were grounds for the decisions that were made. Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo noted that the Center was evaluated by two outside agencies as well. Mayor Michael reported that a delegation traveled to Washington, D.C. last week. He noted that the meetings were productive and indicated that additional grant opportunities were discovered. Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified. R. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 9:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McNay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—April 17, 2013 - Page 10 of 10 CO Z 11 c z - 5 = te r [ s o • M K $ § % E E ; ] ; ] § \ \•t & § �_ k 9 Z § ( OE n p _ ± _ co E \ _o / ( = / \ { - 0 CD § ■ � # E / § & & _ x _ « m _ _ : _ § � . 22 A & f = z- - - 9 12 7 > E \ ƒ m m ° 03 $ In ± 2 * Q ƒ 0 / / £ 7 m / ƒ 7 , = 2 &) £ / g = E w m § \ \ ) ; E ) 9 9 •9 « 7 a E / ° _ § ;• \ \ / . i \ /\ \ ) { C j ƒ - § -. - _. 0 Q 9 \ 2 / 0 - } \ 3 r cli 9 / ° a $ m �f� � /� ann lan ��� O ›A/ cC \ / ( 2 } a r \ \ \ g CO » } 2 _ \ « / / - > d . > & K 11 CD § 0 \ H § 3 m Z \ > >z U) O_ m @ _ _ SS \ SS / ) m = 9 / g ( a ƒ o ; / g\\ °} 2 , x Pa n - i B - . Si? q • Regular Meeting - 7 : 00 p . m . H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Hi . Proclamation declaring May, 2013 as Lupus Awareness Month. PROCLAMATION Please call forward: Purple Rose Foundation ■ Kimberly Dansby Founder and Lupus Survivor * Photo Opportunity * H2. Proclamation declaring May, 2013 as Water Awareness Month. PROCLAMATION Please call forward: Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) Board of Directors ■ Oscar Gonzalez President ■ Randall James Reed Director ■ Kathleen J. Tiegs Director * Photo Opportunity * May 1, 2013 FIRE - PFA- CITY COUNCIL 1 of 4 Regular Meeting - 7 : 00 p. m . H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H3. Presentation to the Hearts for Animal Club at Rancho Cucamonga High School for their support of the Animal Care and Services Center. CERTIFICATES OF RECOGNITION AND PHOTO SLIDES Please call forward: City of Rancho Cucamonga — Animal Care and Adoption Services ■ Barbara Hansen Community Programs Specialist Rancho Cucamonga High School - Hearts for Animal Club ■ Mrs. Deborah "Debbie" Adatto Club Advisor •Dominique Abrantes •Zachary Addington •Melissa Cabrera •Angelique Cervantes •Marissa Contreras •Melina Cortez •Ashley Davis •Lexi Draper •Tiffini Gillespie •Katelyn Goodling •Cadie Harper •Ashlee Kimura •Annelise Lee •Emeline Lee •Katie Lew •Sarah McNair •Charlie Millhourn •Cameron Muller •Kelley Muller •Sachi Murdeshwar •Zehra Naqui •Kelsey Page •Felipe Rezende •Katelyn Rodin •Paige Salley •Victoria Safley •Devon Sanabria •Hayley Uhlack •Crystal Zarola * Photo Opportunity * May 1, 2013 FIRE - PFA - CITY COUNCIL 2 of 4 Regular Meeting - 7 : 00 p. m . H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS ITEM H6. *ITEM TAKE OUT OF ORDER* H6. Proclamation declaring May "National Physical Fitness and Sports Month" Community Activities. PROCLAMATION AND POWERPOINT PRESENTATION Please call forward: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department ■ Celeste Medrano Community Services Supervisor (Sports/RCFSC) H4. Presentation recognizing City of Rancho Cucamonga's Complete Streets Policy. POWERPOINT PRESENTATION ONLY Please call forward: City of Rancho Cucamonga - City Manager's Office - Healthy RC ■ Erika Lewis-Huntley Management Analyst II May 1, 2013 a FIRE - PFA- CITY COUNCIL 3 of 4 c.ft± t ' / RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA Proclamation WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is committed to promoting and securing the health of all its citizens; and WHEREAS, The Purple Rose Foundation was founded in 20/0 to help fight lupus in southern California and is committed to spreading awareness about the disease and providing support to those who have it;and WHEREAS,there are currently approximately 1.5 million Americans nation- wide affected by lupus;and WHEREAS, lupus is an acute and chronic (lifelong)au toimmnne disease in which the immune system is unbalanced, causing inflammation and tissue damage to virtually every organ system in the body; and WHEREAS, lupus can affect any part of the body, including the skin, lungs, heart kidneys, brain and can cause seizures,strokes, heart attacks miscarriages,and organ failure;and WHEREAS,while lupus strikes mostly women of childbearing age, no one is safe from lupus.African Americans,Hispanics/Latinos,Asians and Native Americans are two to three times more likely to develop lupus — a disparity that remains unexplained; and WHEREAS, The Purple Rose Foundation participates in the walk for lupus in partnership with Lupus Foundation of America and will ultimately expand their reach and positively affect the lives of those affected with lupus and other autoimmune diseases. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby proclaim the month ofMay 2013 to be Lupus Awareness Month and urges our citizens to educate themselves on the symptoms and impact of lupus. IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, have hereunto set their hand and caused the seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be affixed this 1"day of May, 2013. . Dennis Michae • Mayor f T Sam S p a of I1'illiam J Al. antler (� � Mayor Pro Te Council ember v r o . i-,; 1:a ,,a) 'n0(lass`O la',c Marc Steinorth Diane Williams • Council Member Council Member Pro clam a don WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is committed to environmental sustainability and promotes a "Healthy Earth" as a component of the City's Healthy RC program; and WHEREAS, California's growing population and the welfare of its communities depends on a realistic high quality water supply; and WHEREAS, California will experience periodic droughts and serious issues facing the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta which will impact our imported water supply, therefore making water conservation critical at all times; and WHEREAS, local governments, water agencies, agriculture,, industry, environmentalists, and concerned citizens are working together to conserve and protect our valuable water resources; and WHEREAS, by encouraging statewide understanding and appreciation of the value of water conservation, we foster wise decisions on water issues and water use; and WHEREAS, during May 2013, water agencies, cities, counties, and organizations throughout California will organize activities to educate the public about water management efforts; and WHEREAS, the Cucamonga Valley Water District has an extensive public outreach program which provides conservation education to all customers and encourages water conversation practices to residential, commercial and industrial customers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes the Cucamonga Valley Water District for their water awareness and conservation efforts and hereby declares the month of May as "Water Awareness Month" and urges residents and businesses to make a special effort to implement water conservation methods in their daily lives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, have hereunto set their hand and caused the seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be affixed this 1'' day of May, 2013. VeW - -, , t tws.P. _......111.. ..„ 1411114k411‘1"11••■••■■--■www, / _ . 4 ,. Illiklik., i ilk . ...._,_„sii.......p. , lika. NIP ---.4 ciao, ( . , ..-- - 4- . .•-• - _ s 104,64145 ; - . te- . 1) q It. ..,.. , ,... 7•411k 1 . 1 4 4..., ' ' '1 AP- :‘.. -...i.._ . 10 A- Afii ill--- i . x I .....e) *IF- r 111" . . _.., i Jr* t ' • - f • . 1.4 / / , low_ o 111,11. 7 j All .. ' . ,,. i..i. .. .• ., .. - ,. • .. :.,. ..., . , . • .• _.• , .•. .111 ,,.. . .. -.v. inil■ ' -r 11111 •,.: • . ----"" h ,rff • .. . . .....--4"r- r". - , 44-4( ,.; ..... .11A : k it 441,-_. • 4._ _ . ,,.... • .A4-. ir .110 -.• . . ■i( / • 'II *Pro .'— , i _ i 1004440, -.0.__.:.. . '-* -• ...%.,. oix,_ it* 7)..... _._ ri .• 11— . . --ei. _.1 . 1., .1( li ', , 4, -. , '4. ii • to-APP -i 4 A t - --.: . tot • • %.. . '",-,i c•1".: t t qt: •"1--• i •--4.---• ' . -.:::'•11t1P:4- 0 47 .:. 41ipIMIIIIPIIIIIIII Ct., t , .10 4i-..• 0..:..,... lift .'. 4-.:. ilE ....... , ..• t, VW_ * -----....._ _ "......, • ' • 14 .: i-N .. ,,... . - ...„ •, r i . • •11..." , ---....... .. . . I '...• ..:, 1 'fi'i . '..,,...,... :.'. I ' 414t't td% , 1 4 • • ..■,,,...{,,,,'.,k..,;„,.-..- A. , WIIIIII I ....-... , 4.- MINK 45 --'.-- . • • . .. ... •:7 .1\ •,-, ,.--r Irk . . .. 3...., .,.;... I PAP - .go i -••, : , • . , _......„ . • _ • , ,i •' - , .....„,„,„,. fil '.„....,,i;„' t • , ,. • _r„.,_....-- 1, .... 43 N. , ....'..-- i t r r 1■17.1111 Illi limmia......__ --rmanlil , . Iti$ ■ , ik . , ,r,.....- i' • .1V- • •P ... .....: 'IC .1, •+0 .. . Li: air Hi 1 t lr I 1 ( al . Ne. 4113- . . • Nit f■ *... • \.`\ ... _ '(,i. ....' •'y •••• - * - . . i . .i S1‘,` '74: 1,. •: . -.' ••■J 1144‘. • ... . .4 '-.--- ,-. 117 :-.... (1 e .4441 . . i 1 I ; . _- ----:ei Li ' • ',- I.e.—L il *, " II. ilk .4..,, A. , , 4 ..- , . ,,... --.1.11'imirsaiw 1‘,. ;- • ' , , .4. 1.... . .• -, -" f - lip ,,c.:•tirhle ; -.. ,,. ,.. .. . . _ . . L, . - .. • -, mil• '''g .. .., -11,• — i'‘It' i.,.' Or' :". .■ -,40. 110 . $.1 i fop. ■, x .III•Milk‘ $ ...i. / . . ..._........, __._ . ,.. _ .. ..,. .. .,..11-.; ' • - t . --....140 . i ; •=4 -.. ,, Ai. _ •.' . . - •-,.. I-4004 ..\.• r \, . VIIIPPI-qh, • . ..1 i . . • 4 St Y WI* ';,-- - 11 111. , +...: . ; .... .. • . ....._• • , . . _,....... .iii, 4 i . . , 11\ „..........._ . Imo t. ...if lot_ • ...•••..._., -14, • : :;., _ - • - ,1/4.. .:_.._.4. ir 41..... .4 1.1 of 70 ! .III ... 111101. , 1 ,r1.1 41 1 , vitt _ ICI .. f ..._ ifr-st .. •• • . . • ,.... ,.... ...., ,.... ..tw. 5. . .... low , ;00 . ,• -,i VIM . ■1 ;A .4• . . . 4 * 11P'' 1 J -urIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIt_ --• pi 4 -'at-43/4144ti I I 4 : I • I 1 1. . ■ 1V 1' ' .- 1 . / i I , t... 1 0 -0, Willi 1 , U ' / - • ' . 4, I . / . . _ _ _ „..._. ..... . ._- . 1 • ■ 4 N.,,. 03'i 4 7 1:01; I .....-..- 4 . • .... . , .._ .. . ,..• Awe-- ..oci •\ $ ..: 0 V , ill - . I -- -' I% - l•Feb , ■,- 7, . ... r'.1 .. • ..• # • 1 , i . *- ........ „ . ._ •,....-..,,,,• ,,,- , . lir • .7.'7' 11411IPIN . '.. 4 t i • . • ' 1 ' / le • .0 , I - • - 1 .k „,.40,......,.._ t• i. . a • IRktl, i, .....t. \1/4 . . . 4.4". _ -f lb. . , , 4.... . .. .....-111L r........„___ 11111111 litin -. A 1 -- i -71 i . . . I I L.. 'IP' / !1 I:t : .,-.4 it i . i' 1 4• A-4 - ' *A, - Aiith 1 .... ._,- .,. .. _ ..dik d• '. . illb • . Clir) :44.114111 9 AI %Or _ ---——— 4 1•11 , ,......■•'' i :"..• • . t•• Ally 4 L . -OMR . • .,!. ti••J 4-.5- '.'t . 1 )JO . --i-.. 4r1 - __,. . , • . . 1 '1 ... , • i t r 7 . ilk i ..••••le 411114-7 ':-. ,„,-- ,.... , ..;* - , . 4.. 1 ••,. ,. . 1 . ip3 , . .. • lip: r'lk.; . . iMINNI :1 i°14110 tt.,6 lib l.1.1Vir• ( 41.7 - .. 8.-_,:- , •-,._- . _ . .i ,. ....-- ,.. 4 ‘..t. ..I. 4.1111111#11111111 1 \ r„.. -■ jer . • Proclamation WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is committed to promoting a Healthy Rancho Cucamonga "Healthy RC"and securing the health and well-being of all its citizens; and WHEREAS, the President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports has designated the month of May as National Physical Fitness and Sports Month and has created the Presidential Fitness Challenge to help people track their activities and improve their fitness; and • WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is teaming up with the President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports to encourage residents of all ages to incorporate physical activity into their daily lives; and WHEREAS, physical activity increases the chances of living longer, reduces the risk of high blood pressure, heart disease and some types ofcancer and promotes better sleep, strengthens bones and lowers the risk of depression; and WHEREAS, the recommended Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans is 2 hours and 30 minutes of moderate aerobic activity each week; and WHEREAS, the City's Community Services Department offers residents of all ages a wide range offun activities and classes that promote physical fitness at its.facilities and parks. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the City Council ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby proclaim the month of May 2013 as National Physical Fitness and Sports Month and urges all residents to engage in physical activity and enjoy the classes and activities offered by the Community Services Department. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, have hereunto set their hand and caused the seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be affixed this 1s' day of May, 2013. • I , A 4 Q1- ' I .. �Ar*-} 13 l • �. . -R' - ! Cn > 71 r ' LS .0 —. Q� aO 7 C I /. . ,-,- I ■• iq > > • • ..tv ... imi,,,„. ., - , z 1 • • • M Z 2 4,90 • 46,46. 4.. .., 1 • , � Cl) 0 j °4 ' \1.7 : E co .i _ .. .. ,, _ . _ o . . .• ...... = . „ . . :,...,. !..♦ . ,_ Ili 14101r: = :-.:4;,,,, iril, - It X1."'1r -'!... 4„1-.. J.,, . f .i ,. •, •.,.. _,. , vs, - ` ' A, ,,,i t e . cno� " mot ,(21) 5 > '-'..; el el fjitk � p p ( # Y 0 o w 3 (.0 ‘-rnr1) g3 -0 I * M H 11 i. 0 : cnc) � Q a- Q rn 73 E = o v t.4-; „ _. O (7) r 0: PO V)el i.C C _,,evii\0 6 K.) CO = J3 CD -o w Cn Cn VD) ED rn a Ts .II n 01 4s< 0 Q o M 3 0 I _ -ml _ Cn D -' 5 '%ti s”' ti-0 1> F ;i •-2• v n y/ cn o ; 0#cc) * 74 C) p I 1 4 if: r .:,. Cl)) g rF 71 o' cn S 5. 71 = Ft; D TS CD �-r fD c cD c 3 3 a 12 CD cc, I I cD - cD 0 N -n -a O- 71 ...< (1) gi 2) a) M 2t) 0 . cD al `C m N N _, Z (-3 emF a) 3 .I ..� "' O— 3 mil n cD O c,- -D fD 3 0 DJ N E n cn 0 a 5- _ M rn Q � oN. � _1 CT (/) N -D Q 9 W U = (/) I O g O W ( ) N Q 0 N EP O N ,+ O N A d N ? -I -0. N 7C 3 1 N N N 3 5 Uf i .,k .04 0 '' �. o - „ l3iy , s �' ( inn - 4 .. • 1 'a t.ar .z Lill n ? g _:_„,. v.)0 n t^d • • ri't B > > * •41111:".) +r• tro; > Ade DJ 71 CO Q a) x �, w nl 1 , ,„„ �' C) 2 -0 W 2) m a) IT; — D M 71 0_L — Q c o a) -0 v 0 r 2) 0 4ii< o N.) m t< CD _, , a) CD _L › , cr9- 73 > ,.=. - 1,.. o 0 1 c 1/4.< _. 0 -0 .. cr w cn -o = X N cn P _ 2 0 3 0) 0 CD -0 3 -0 3 to x 3 CD x M 4 ry t Vi •:, • ''' .. - `'Y aA g7 • 1 mow, 0 22 C rF -n o -n m C7 cl) o�+ to CD = (r) _L N, v met �, cn N o Cn OM CD z (to - oh< szo 5 max) * C — 4 CD C7 � o 0 w z co (c) to o M cn to a —1 w Vim a pi '' *. CC) -�•! w r - - , .. -. E >I iii, 111PI' u • 4•• Ilk k lt, 21) Na• 70 10 21) tilift 0 2) , I, C111) Cli) trip , ,.,... C -L 0 ::-. ‘.; ox 2 'duirAllikt . ■fi, PI+ E 0 0 •- rn n Ill< M X CIO al m% ■L 2111 '_.. ...4—- - = 0 • ti s -4r, - C2 CD a) t•f� t I V : L t Itirit:N...„;-,i„,,,36; - ,,`" 'sk CO ,,• .. Ws, CD . . ._ . .,.. . ' ..--ar r-,,,,tz... . . .. nn -7 .. C■2t > > • a*IV I Cn CD 21) Z min _i• _, C rim 0 Mit '� CD a < CD �� 3CDCP ,.. co .„, (in „for. , ,. ,. ., ,, . �, _ I 1 ihi< . - =.. M W . N.) 13 E m or) • ,f ';011 if,,.. II. J ,. G:Y , S1) W -0 •.., . .. t 3 . i 0 -_ •.... Z mit c mil poi. w "41 —• 2) (In _. o 71 C Z MAN a 0 v! 0" . i0+, yr a , g i H-. 0 5,,:, • • a* U n 4: ** * � I - 11 Ca 3 cft,Li4A- 00 _• ,.__ —' e, cn a lb<, t., = ‘< O N n -• � t n , m x E *\Z. cn m • • ;17 co co MM.• w 0 = o r * CO -0 a)--"'Z' = 1_,• tit, 2 es = Z to Co _• to 0 ito. ..,._ ,., • . a. .t. i, I 21't 3 > > . •ibtk (_) + . ak, . y ■ aD < = a) a u) (1) ... C") * M fli) _. o. yG C 0 r•,.4 ° • %ti ,sfi4 TC1 ~,!) . 2 ;{"P! * -„ , „:, . 0 0 a) a ., Ro 3 ,:. • , I • , ...... ,,,.r,. 3 = ri) , .:., i _ ,. , ,. I,„ ,- .1 •...0 iiii< 71 CD C . - -.'r''''II kV i, I Tlii 2 . . i , - imp f 0 ” X CD ■• Ihi< Cl)CD . . . , .;.,.• CT (D Ill< * 1.• 77 = 00 CI) a) (n = 0 Co cu 3 ,.. CD May / a 0 v ?, 3 „, i v -. . IS J. :10 0 1 .1 r ......7, ; 23 _. ■ C =rflik:- :, 1:lil ,(a) .7 .. (ID 2 I I) fikm-.5•It\,,.• Pr • p 1111, )1 n. 3 •,,,,, •..... Cl) IIIIII< 0 (11 in i 1 . �, , � a `f.t f•' f V/ 1511P: 7. € Y.' /-1\ 0is„.600Y.F,4 NATIONAL I '. -- RANCHO CUCAM1f°NG:1 PHYSICAL FITNESS i MONTH Community Services Depart • rhent . .. GE • rACr�VE - GETFIT - STAYHEALTNv Healthy RC Fitness FREE Dro • -In S I orts Challenge The City of Rancho Cucamonga and Cardio Fit Location:RC Family Sports Center are challenging residents to a fitness challenge! 9059 San Bernardino Road Challenge includes: Fitness Assessment (BMI), I . . ; 4' Nutrition and Workout Tips from Cardio Fit, Mondays: May 6th, 13th and 20th Daily Challenges and Prizes. Time: 9:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. In order to participate: Wednesdays: May 8th, 15th, 22nd & 29th 1 . Register by calling 909-477-2785 2. Set up a Fitness Assessment (BMI) May Time:9:00 a.m.- I:00 p.m. I st - 3rd I Dro • - ° • c . •• -' •• • ati First Fitness Assessment: May I st - 3rd Wednesdays: May 8th, 1 5th, 22nd & 29th Final Fitness Assessment: May 28th - 3 I st Time: 4:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. li Tuesdays: May 7th, 14th, 2 I st & 28th Brunswick Deer Creek Time: 9:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. .. . . Thursdays: May 9th, 1 6th, 23rd & 30th Frida , Ma • 17th at 6:30 p.m. Time: 5:25 p.m. - 6:25 p.m. $8 per person for two hours of bowling including shoe rental For more information on ALL OVER 40% OFF! events/activities/classes call 909-477-2785 x. 2340 Community Hike Healthy RC Fitness, Sports 4u�1641 4..acii' s'Acti . i..liu & Wellness Fair Location:Etiwanda Preserve Participants must RSVP I Location:Central Park 909-477-2785 by Thursday, 1 1200 Base Line Road May 16th before 10:00 a.m. eBODY.E �1 r .I 4 ' • •i f � N it g �1 � c�;0NGA Community Services Department ' Iâe n Spoit Weilness Saturday, I I th • 8 a. m . - Noon Central Park 11200 Base Line Road Featuring the 8th ilruuial Friends of the Pacific Clectric Trail - Cucamonga Challenge Participate in: 5K, I OK or 7 mile family ride OR 35 mile bike ride (Beginning on the Pacific Electric Trail and continuing on city streets) All ages and skill levels welcome! tigr4 Walk It,Ride It,Hoof It For more information or to egister visit www.CucamongaChallenge.com, www.Active.com or in person at REI in Rancho Cucamonga fifty, . City of Rancho Cucamonga 4'; ,4 R Ifrat Community Recreation Needs Assessment Survey www. rrcinfo.com/RCOPEN Your Vision is the Future! The City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department is conducting a city-wide Community Recreation Needs Assessment. This includes a comprehensive community input process with community workshops, stakeholder interviews, on-line forum and the implementation of a formal survey instrument to identify areas of service strengths and delivery of parks, recreation, cultural arts, open space, trails, facilities, programs and services. Your feedback will provide the foundation of information to identify recreational needs and develop a 10 to 15 year vision for Rancho Cucamonga Park & Recreation Programs and Services. Visit www.RCCommunityldeas.com to participate in the on-line community forum. Please Visit RCpark.com for Information Regarding Community Services Department Programs & Services Q toi ›. 1 —*!ix - 1•►• s•x C) ! • . . Zx • ♦i. ri) E n O M0 tw P: 3 a' ..< -< _ n pa NJ o = fD = CD W elm el W CD O . el cra S. 0 ara ,D =IN. cD 3 o V) O ma = o CM o au • el Vi IPIIII it* yo . co O. 0' 111;11:111: .,-- ...„. r II, , 111C°' • • K co -0 _= o • v) 0.) a) 3 0- o —• ors 0 n 0 .....• cn n cn O rD _. + c (to rD CD 0.) • -0 . . DJ -h -% (D CD o 20) CD ( D _• r) n 0 CD CD� 0 4 t . ....0. a) 0. 3 •, ' D CD 73... . _...,. .._, , ,,,- O_ E2• % ,a D r-I• Q CD r CD i ! Alli G �. _ rD 0 MI16 & .07 leiCill --: ---:. .. .- (D -20 ,r,fi r:' ` V) •GEO lit .PE . .. • • • • • • m : 3 -' C O = -N O v) = O FET CD 3 -0 to _. = O O O —� rD n � rt + � � (Ds -o rD D-- (A) D 5. 0_ CD D O 3 7 0. < D �, • el D —% D O r-f- n 3 E. 3 Fi. %< r-1- CD D rD 0_ et) O CD v) D rD D n n 1 co r-1-CU < O CD V) 71 r-1- (1) (TO = 3 ' rD co FrD co � —n. n _CU 0- rD -• <_ \ ( ' ..< OrQ I4:' _ rt T • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 - ) n o `- z n > > < -. -. 3 CD O CD c CD r = = v,' n n rD O CD W Q -1 -' V) D V) 3 ; x �• O O CD n 0_ r+ -' n O 0 0 n n "' = -i r+ CD On O0 r 0J a_ c D (� co O 0 O r Q O . CO 0- (D D CT CD V)CD rt cr) CD n CD 0 n r--f CD 0 CD cn M CD CD X �. 3 rt _ r(n-F- O v)r'f' CD CA -5 —S N CD _k O CD _n iii +=se...• 4i= N • 0 Dfl ID z -s _. oz I&:, 00 > 0 0=I r- ■ O `T' C . = Z T.--T1 r- Fi 'ebb --I ago ,z, (D 3 rn rn ---s a • n 4) • • • • • • • 70 -c) 5 n v) n v) n CD O O �, N - rp 3 rD G) co N 3 -0 70 r-r r+ cl)--I O c O SD V) D =-' F-t. 70 : n r-r (7 CD rp v) %< 0 M v)= 0 m : -. r-t. n -I, O D n < 0 M- C ora (p CD v) O 0 ,C C7 - -H n 7 n CD < O ..<ii; -• —• v) 3 r+- — O -0 3 rp cn — -n 0— —. CfQ D 3 , co cn rt •� ' , _ 4 LJ :� I i 1 . .o m IA,I4. (A r. 01r..1 .: , , -. it ,;, FAL = '17: r . ei. i i ,... ., • ca ., . cs m mD,E,:: 0 _.;:....--4_,_-...-_-,,i .,,. . , L- . Ift■X Z :13 rii+ 0 n o rb:) pip ZNI _ _• Cis) cn CII) 0 Z rift e) r). Leimah Iliti r0 0 0 ril (,, eifti% _ , e., sz e) ii, NJ C:1) 0 k-a • NJ raja VIZ A14, fa .„,„„,„„ft 0 0 Zia° 17: 11. 11 .11 1 rtl __ • • • • • • • n T -0 co -D -0 rn y —' o c c D INNY -< a) -• -• Q Ec 1 m tu 0 —• `C orq D -1 01:1 O C 0 D C - . h ' I < n � v n • • • • • • 0 = n cn cn = n rn „ Ts CD D n CD 0 CD �' CU — 0 0 �' -1 D ftl (-r n ,C = -2 -0 `.1 = = 4=7. 0- (1) = r+ ''At7 0 0 •moo cD —I r+ O n D cu CD (lb "wla I r-t• &A., CO T r- -0 E, I0 p CD c - co o n Q _• m n .ail% RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIBRARY FOUNDATION & PLANNING DEPT. PRESENT ... , r °'°� ;,r, gam{• •7 �ti r Spy `T' 8, !df {y ii 6 �y !! ..''� < - afro r .. i ' ,A ! � i` y,1 r."IV 1��l .. f•1`2^`� \1 ""-`" °' lr�` `„ ` MY..,. !�' i ":N .' . 1{?,. +i • ,t e, y ',.. . .,,,N•4'� },.Y,,r wik,r1 �y1 1{ •.ji ' ( f' �` +t4.� O a irk ► 1,44 ,,, ` V f w k* 4'4 1 a'' ,1' . ,, „',1 b�� �1(4•��� '#• ,Y �i k•ill E 44.41 ,• * ,rfe t. CIF �� `,:A;V.44< '.,f t ,llj,, x;91) P q l +•'��, r�,•Il.11,1►Iti,,,,,�w6«<'Ilf �f ')`,, G • ''t' :'°r h t 1 • �. :i 1:1.*t c> it} i ) i • Syr 1 t'r 't ,�' .I I r r,, -611 r ;t, 1, °{ ._ � +i "1 Itt i � �'1 5t,41w°�V' ��r 1� �•�1 S'�d �a•.' 'i.1” " it t ��.1'�'r'.. �7!'-•�1(61114,0#1 if � ` 'T li{��F' Jl J kit' 'rf• `k} 1 I �j it4,yf8 M 1.$Ail ?�,y,0 . 4l.. I L J s ' , '4'14:11• llfT.�d�♦1 ~ + .' . s•,, ���f ¢ ' •�. 4 j 1` I :.4 YL. T•i d4_ s { 4 t gaff"t( , ,o, to 'C . , , '..1 1 1 i � . .l S �' -N'i� � �T^ .e j e• >,�fi ;: �y1 y S�� k ,�e 1 Q i� x.?f K"1•r#k' i t ..„1.1„,,, t i:�` Q 1i I'j(J�,p{d 1' y , �� y �g j -v 'Y r ,y.'ir*i°11t��1, ,'t'04'-' i - r ,R' Jf.,.$k 1 .;4,,, t C / .,,:• ;'uj l l f'.:1)11* 1 �`�r ) ) '� ,..-.....--•-41,w .P' �Y i y t ■ 1I 1 f hilt �T r { !x.:tr z. :.',; ' a , ' r N.. '�i 4.. ;m.. ` I !''y"1 1 • a It-ii/01 �:'': ,r ,. ti ,4 s.'fa''' ; ,,,,a�, ` . 4i l#1 V J !*, > .,.41-1..H11,41' M ,1� r+':', . ,WI-V411 If li ,i'. t j}. re s j. ... f 41.-'•x€• -' �lat •,!•, 1_-..i -• • 'Ai � • A. : .6 i i, • . l Y '�� Vi. 1° rl. it •::.i i,1'.s1 ,., „; •,. i r 4"g M,1 r'.� ♦ f7 1t, iq { rs `� 1�,� ``1 { �•{ It r '�;* :<Ft�i',Fr)t 'l: � 4,,r.2.-":: . t`r. �r. t,t fy 4 iei a. 1!,i �i ' t t ; ,� '`4 1;.'t• f. 4 -t ' `s & 1 i ti.' �1 '4. s "',f i rkl. 4,',41 ••.Y j • M 4' ..1.1 ••'I !'I "Y •�• cgu� ; ��, d '�• }fi ati•`l '!`���,�, .�`'lt � �'tS ly �F` �•t!':.: t'�Al. '''�t �.' " lii •orpty'y') ��l.Y��r'�R�1^ �'t� �,.�c .q�� �.1'i2 lt�.'+tt' • I'.• �•1' � 1r'Sj` ,11 .J' �y7•,'r.. . ` el., , t0 'rj 1 `+f,'! _ ! s:' Y'i " -1 1 .Ir, 'o I t�•I��i?1({ ,{�,Y..f�jY t+ , 'Jh`. l�7'�,.�y •.f`'I,I��.I't1 AL:1 _ lS ' i .. �, �'1. , 1 /11.1 • f� d♦ 17 f•�,�'n I :•: .� .l' Y r ' # .M ! r i ! 1. 1; s f t .....-04'•Y.t r.f rl, 4' t' .♦ r •� (. „41t rfl '1A.) 711� 1 p i.w -1 s Pt � 1• l { '1' � e1{,il.tj !11r}��••r {+�,.� h � 1 ,1" 1V y 'L '' 4 ar • 1 fl't - LP '(I'. .., t.,.1. 1 •..° 1ll1t, ,:t'-1' ,,Y( �. �J' i (116...,._ i°r. R NCH CITCAMONGA i :rM r• LIBRARY SERVICES 4 ,-.)1 ' L- i, , ',:`1 .' 5 - `�'V'' '. Lb -fie ,•,.F:; • # 1r i +N�R'v J,�,„„d•l .' { _ f ,i -`' \ `, t, •. 1ti r-! ° p i 4•y '• i 5d ii.. lslr'! ' a,`✓ . t•iR A tir�f ' i t i•. rt, �'L+ w .. '��, t -,� l4. t '. r`- .1,' i a` } ks-1 ';45,:,. .', Alt 14 C- I4 , i. i�vvvv 161. i;;' ' �t , - r . 4 iti t ,• •f! - It. 11 ., ''I '1 k' F i'• 1 �r ;- j r, v ! �r�t . !,. t f'�• y. Lr}• 1 � •! - f . I 'i• • ,1r 1 l• . . • 4•. - tI Y j{.r� ; r ,, • e' hl t? ' -y, [' ' ( f;� • 1 1. l i t ,, . i 1 47 `a i . ` ,,3,,' ,v , djrr !v j. •'r r r ,". ,; `}441/4• -.±f; . r ( t�,. :� 'F �' b g E n t r1 F, y � , , ! 1. ' 31. T �' Vi' ((�' r• 1 ■ rr � •E�.'�� .+ •i f . r. ,.' lY 6 ,. . r f.,aJ .•` I !'_ t. 714, # _ • r; 'ill .. q- ✓ {.• r .''. ��)1. .T t�t ! i. Dcfa E s 1 1f4 if fc i t �LA''1 . `:47 ja P ';r ,.' -' i` , 4� 't ` • . � r 5t. • ; a' }. it� ' � d r • r d ;' Iii. ` " ,',I I. '(� f- rt 1 . 5 O ; r4 i' ' ti.:r • 1 �•tr '1 •v t I J . • f r y j! 1 -t S'• J 1i .s,rf •1�1 • ' /1n� 2 .s'• ` "•�c l' tit .�� t�•'i ' r. • w ` a 2 ''Y{7 ,i } l'', ` it. q,.--# '&- a, ��. '4' .:f • .• • R '' yy'�lli.. l l'�rl f. ,:!� �`• . '1 as y''e�. tiry ,'� - J ,3s.r ,•1,i iir ' Z K ��i( .T�• - �r ! ^ 1. 1•, ` �'�/�q1��j� r•i�: 'I/- y•A. „{. t{! yc t ° 1r�1• ^ r ,( r,. t { '1 b '1 44i t� • 1�l;.V'•! �1 .1h ' .;. f 1i1 j 5 �.•• Y,- • S 'r•! R IL' � •i t. t{ - �t `Y' 'i r ) yf r l'.t , I t • •�f + I . 9 ' 'ti '1 '° r S{a •• TF� r -,if,v°. i 1 t ' ,! g t }fr- _ ,N#.,, ,..,,,—• `i ^• ,1, � . ' 11 ?�I' 1: ! f�.:.)n '. • L;j � .� r t tr4 d.• Local H 2013 Ma • Silverados Band ri a y 7pm ' �•Vinta Vintage Cars and Fire Truck •"Portal to the Future" Sneak Peek rou • Local Historical G s Tickets required P Available starting April 29 • Local Author ' T,ine Dancing agici ' _M an, Storyteller • Crafts and Game for Children • Panel Discussion on RC's Music History and more. . . iroe Ito 4,di1111I. 2013 WINNER I '• .-..f.,....; ' "' of the NATIONAL MEDAL :. ` ' - for Museum and Library Service RANCHO like us on :L c from the Inshurte of Museum and Library Services woes m�s.gov CUCAMONGA facebook . ° Biane Library 12505 Cultural Center Drive 909.477.2720 www.rcpl.lib.ca.us RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P1 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00335119 2013/04/101 ALL CITIES TOOLS 88.56 AP 00335119 2013/04/101 ALL CITIES TOOLS 90.00 AP 00335124 2013/04/10( AT&T MOBILITY 58.25 AP 00335141 2013/04/10( CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 128.95 AP 00335141 2013/04/10( CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 237.58 AP 00335141 2013/04/10( CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 167.39 AP 00335142 2013/04/10( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 78.07 AP 00335142 2013/04/10( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 4.48 AP 00335142 2013/04/10 1 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 38.45 AP 00335157 2013/04/101 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTEC 468.00 AP 00335164 2013/04/10 l EMERGENCY ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS 1,900.00 AP 00335170 2013/04/10( FLEET SERVICES INC. 69.07 AP 00335170 2013/04/10( FLEET SERVICES INC. 140.24 AP 00335173 2013/04/10( FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 169.65 AP 00335193 2013/04/10( HOLT,DANNY 112.45 AP 00335193 2013/04/10 l HOLT,DANNY 10.79 AP 00335194 2013/04/101 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 37.77 AP 00335196 2013/04/101 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 48.59 AP 00335212 2013/04/101 KME FIRE APPARATUS 653.40 AP 00335212 2013/04/10( KME FIRE APPARATUS 88279 AP 00335212 2013/04/10( KME FIRE APPARATUS 434.81 AP 00335212 2013/04/10( KME FIRE APPARATUS 240.43 AP 00335223 2013/04/101 MG ENTERPRISES INC -4,637.49 AP 00335223 2013/04/101 MG ENTERPRISES INC 92,749.71 AP 00335237 2013/04/10 l OFFICE DEPOT 17.99 AP 00335237 2013/04/10 l OFFICE DEPOT 51.79 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 5.03 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 3.95 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 94.25 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT -23.63 AP 00335237 2013/04/101 OFFICE DEPOT -27.51 AP 00335237 2013/04/101 OFFICE DEPOT 42.10 AP 00335254 2013/04/10( S B C H M R A 250.00 AP 00335265 2013/04/10( SMART AND FINAL 23.44 AP 00335265 2013/04/10( SMART AND FINAL 2875 AP 00335266 2013/04/10( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 113.36 AP 00335266 2013/04/101 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 108.11 AP 00335266 2013/04/101 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 75.36 AP 00335276 2013/04/10( SUN BADGE CO 358.97 AP 00335276 2013/04/10( SUN BADGE CO 545.55 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 21.30 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.22 AP 00335295 2013/04/101 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 132.69 AP 00335295 2013/04/101 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 132.69 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 21.31 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P2 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335296 2013/04/10( VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 1,988.01 AP 00335302 2013/04/10( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 64.33 AP 00335307 2013/04/10( WLC 18,730.03 AP 00335310 2013/04/10( ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 49.03 AP 00335310 2013/04/10( ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 49.03 AP 00335310 2013/04/10( ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 16.35 AP 00335312 2013/04/11 ( AIRGAS USA LLC 158.88 AP 00335312 2013/04/11 ( AIRGAS USA LLC 37.81 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 394.29 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 371.66 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 263.40 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP 00335320 2013/04/11 ( MOTOROLA 211.89 AP 00335320 2013/04/11 ( MOTOROLA 6,419.46 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 93.03 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 45.69 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 29.10 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 28.19 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 48.87 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 62.76 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 64.05 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 62.76 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.58 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 39.64 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 2729 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 l UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 62.76 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 80.01 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 61.99 AP 00335323 2013/04/11 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 45.20 AP 00335336 2013/04/17( AIR&HOSE SOURCE INC. 158.00 AP 00335340 2013/04/17 l ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 1,265.69 AP 00335349 2013/04/17( BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 96.00 AP 00335363 2013/04/17 l CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 5.70 AP 00335363 2013/04/17 l CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 68.03 AP 00335368 2013/04/17( CONFIRE JPA 23,886.09 AP 00335368 2013/04/17( CONFIRE JPA 19,108.87 AP 00335368 2013/04/17( CONFIRE JPA 4,77721 AP 00335371 2013/04/17( CSTI 750.00 AP 00335382 2013/04/17( EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 75.43 AP 00335383 2013/04/17 l EMS LABORATORIES 48.00 AP 00335384 2013/04/17( ESTRELLA,JESSICA 10.00 AP 00335384 2013/04/17( ESTRELLA,JESSICA 20.00 AP 00335388 2013/04/17 l FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 237.19 AP 00335388 2013/04/17( FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 116.83 AP 00335388 2013/04/17( FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 129.60 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P3 Agenda Check Resister 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335392 2013/04/17( GRAINGER 1,266.98 AP 00335392 2013/04/171 GRAINGER 350.63 AP 00335406 2013/04/17 l INTEGRITY DOOR&HARDWARE INC 675.96 AP 00335407 2013/04/17 l INTERNATIONAL EZ UP INC 2,585.54 AP 00335408 2013/04/17( ISG INFRASYS 362.50 AP 00335413 2013/04/17( KME FIRE APPARATUS 403.49 AP 00335415 2013/04/17( LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 653.41 AP 00335415 2013/04/17( LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 321.83 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 56.39 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 159.77 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 32.94 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 39.52 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 2228 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. -18.91 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 108.11 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 125.13 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 49.62 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 56.38 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 65.90 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 18.40 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 24.56 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 89.37 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 9.76 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 11.17 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 4.07 AP 00335421 2013/04/17 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 14.32 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 35.80 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 12.25 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. -136.77 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. -18.39 AP 00335424 2013/04/17 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 113.71 AP 00335425 2013/04/17( MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 1,065.78 AP 00335425 2013/04/17( MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 2,163.85 AP 00335428 2013/04/17( MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 168.00 AP 00335431 2013/04/17 ( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 82.78 AP 00335432 2013/04/171 NAPA AUTO PARTS 12.09 AP 00335433 2013/04/17( NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 170.19 AP 00335434 2013/04/17 l NEW PIG CORP 151.72 AP 00335434 2013/04/17( NEW PIG CORP 1,480.00 AP 00335435 2013/04/17( NEXTEL 162.97 AP 00335438 2013/04/171 OFFICE DEPOT 71.00 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 l OFFICE DEPOT 92.58 AP 00335445 2013/04/17( PALMER,MARIE 500.00 AP 00335454 2013/04/17( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 33,941.07 AP 00335454 2013/04/17( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 877.11 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P4 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335454 2013/04/17 ( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 6,430.64 AP 00335454 2013/04/17 l PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 104.09 AP 00335454 2013/04/171 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 34,833.88 AP 00335454 2013/04/17 I PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 69,837.82 AP 00335454 2013/04/171 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 15,556.28 AP 00335454 2013/04/17( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 34,286.54 AP 00335454 2013/04/17( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 35,003.21 AP 00335454 2013/04/17( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 35,149.53 AP 00335454 2013/04/17( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 1,040.93 AP 00335454 2013/04/171 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 8,008.05 AP 00335454 2013/04/17 l PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 8,645.90 AP 00335454 2013/04/17( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 35,302.62 AP 00335454 2013/04/17( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 11,231.79 AP 00335454 2013/04/171 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 5,323.70 AP 00335454 2013/04/171 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 5,461.24 AP 00335454 2013/04/171 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 34,157.84 AP 00335454 2013/04/171 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 8,510.40 AP 00335454 2013/04/17( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 555.64 AP 00335454 2013/04/17( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 16,910.78 AP 00335454 2013/04/171 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 487.35 AP 00335454 2013/04/17 l PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 162.79 AP 00335465 2013/04/17( RULES GUYS LLC,THE 600.00 AP 00335466 2013/04/17( SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 65.00 AP 00335471 2013/04/17( SC FUELS 1,770.69 AP 00335471 2013/04/17( SC FUELS 2,857.59 AP 00335471 2013/04/17( SC FUELS 1,428.77 AP 00335471 2013/04/17 ( SC FUELS 3,523.31 AP 00335471 2013/04/17 l SC FUELS 3,452.85 AP 00335471 2013/04/171 SC FUELS 1,865.77 AP 00335471 2013/04/17( SC FUELS 2,557.39 AP 00335471 2013/04/17( SC FUELS 2,508.74 AP 00335483 2013/04/17( SNAWDER,RICK 200.00 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 614.12 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 160.87 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 781.10 AP 00335497 2013/04/171 STAPLETON,JOSHUA 50.00 AP 00335501 2013/04/17( TECOTZKY,RALPH 200.00 AP 00335502 2013/04/17( TERMBYIX PROCESSING CENTER 81.00 AP 00335502 2013/04/17( TERMINlX PROCESSING CENTER 73.00 AP 00335502 2013/04/17( TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 73.00 AP 00335502 2013/04/171 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER -15.00 AP 00335502 2013/04/17( TERMfNIX PROCESSING CENTER 65.00 AP 00335504 2013/04/17( TOLL,RICHARD 200.00 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.17 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 50.64 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P5 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.11 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 485.56 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 177.46 Ap 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 555.21 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 536.07 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 128.63 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 50.64 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 207.85 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 82.24 AP 00335521 2013/04/17( VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 827.76 AP 00335522 2013/04/17( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 116.94 Ap 00335523 2013/04/171 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 600.10 AP 00335523 2013/04/171 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 600.10 AP 00335523 2013/04/171 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 200.03 AP 00335538 2013/04/18( CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 301.16 AP 00335538 2013/04/18( CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 148.33 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 22.69 AP 00335547 2013/04/18 ( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 152.36 AP 00335550 2013/04/18( NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 334.50 AP 00335555 2013/04/18( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 41.73 AP 00335555 2013/04/18( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 68.56 AP 00335555 2013/04/18 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 27.00 AP 00335555 2013/04/181 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 31.05 AP 00335555 2013/04/181 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 86.67 AP 00335555 2013/04/181 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 60.67 AP 00335555 2013/04/18( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 63.35 AP 00335555 2013/04/18( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 39.58 AP 00335555 2013/04/18( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 59.35 Ap 00335555 2013/04/18( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 52.13 AP 00335556 2013/04/22( KILMER, STEPHEN 1,191.24 AP 00335557 2013/04/221 WALKER,KENNETH 255.43 EP 00003276 2013/04/22 l AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 1,248.04 EP 00003277 2013/04/22( ALMAND,LLOYD 625.86 EP 00003278 2013/04/22 f BANTAU,VICTORIA 809.17 EP 00003278 2013/04/22( BANTAU,VICTORIA 392.46 EP 00003279 2013/04/22( BAZAL,SUSAN 1,018.59 EP 00003279 2013/04/22 l BAZAL,SUSAN 1,315.75 EP 00003280 2013/04/221 BERRY,DAVID 889.80 EP 00003281 2013/04/22 l BILLINGS, ESTER 146.32 EP 00003282 2013/04/22( BROCK,ROBIN 42.39 EP 00003283 2013/04/22( CAMPBELL,GERALD 1,191.24 EP 00003284 2013/04/22 1 CARNES, KENNETH 675.77 EP 00003285 2013/04/221 CLABBY,RICHARD 889.80 EP 00003286 2013/04/221 CORCORAN,ROBERT 1,792.80 EP 00003287 2013/04/22( COX,FAYE 173.37 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P6 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount EP 00003288 2013/04/22( COX,KARL 625.86 EP 00003289 2013/04/22( CRANE,RALPH 2,334.34 EP 00003290 2013/04/22( CROSSLAND,WILBUR 461.74 EP 00003291 2013/04/221 DAGUE,JAMES 1,792.80 EP 00003292 2013/04/22 l DE ANTONIO,SUSAN 838.90 EP 00003293 2013/04/22( DOMINICK, SAMUEL A. 1,792.80 EP 00003294 2013/04/22( EAGLESON,MICHAEL 2,365.14 EP 00003295 2013/04/221 FRITCHEY,JOHN D. 675.77 EP 00003296 2013/04/221 HEYDE,DONALD 1,792.80 EP 00003297 2013/04/22 l INTERLICCHIA,ROSALYN 739.03 EP 00003297 2013/04/22 l INTERLICCHIA,ROSALYN 1,053.77 EP 00003298 2013/04/22( LANE,WILLIAM 2,365.14 EP 00003299 2013/04/22( LEE,ALLAN 1,474.38 EP 00003300 2013/04/22 1 LENZE,PAUL E 1,264.95 EP 00003301 2013/04/221 LONGO, JOE 173.37 EP 00003302 2013/04/22( LUTTRULL,DARRELL 675.77 EP 00003303 2013/04/22( MACKALL,BENJAMIN 173.37 EP 00003304 2013/04/22( MAYFIELD,RON 3,069.14 EP 00003305 2013/04/221 MCKEE,JOHN 1,360.66 EP 00003306 2013/04/22 1 MCMILLEN,LINDA 177.69 EP 00003306 2013/04/22( MCMILLEN,LINDA 448.17 EP 00003307 2013/04/22( MCNEIL,KENNETH 2,334.34 EP 00003308 2013/04/22( MICHAEL,L.DENNIS 1,209.33 EP 00003309 2013/04/221 MORGAN,BYRON 2,163.80 EP 00003310 2013/04/22( MYSKOW,DENNIS 889.80 EP 00003311 2013/04/22( NAUMAN,MICHAEL 889.80 EP 00003312 2013/04/221 NEE,RON 3,069.14 EP 00003313 2013/04/221 NELSON,MARY JANE 173.37 EP 00003314 2013/04/221 PLOUNG,MICHAEL J 1,059.92 EP 00003315 2013/04/22 l POST,MICHAEL R 1,845.95 EP 00003316 2013/04/22( PROULX,PATRICK 2,365.14 EP 00003317 2013/04/22 ( ROEDER,JEFF 2,365.14 EP 00003318 2013/04/221 SALISBURY,THOMAS 1,715.38 EP 00003319 2013/04/22 I SMITH,RONALD 889.80 EP 00003320 2013/04/22 l SPAGNOLO,SAM 461.74 EP 00003321 2013/04/22( SPAIN,WILLIAM 675.77 EP 00003322 2013/04/22( SULLIVAN,JAMES 1,002.90 EP 00003323 2013/04/22( TAYLOR, STEVE 1,264.95 EP 00003324 2013/04/22 1 TULEY,TERRY 1,792.80 EP 00003325 2013/04/221 VANDERKALLEN,FRANCIS 1,870.22 EP 00003326 2013/04/22 f WOLFE,JACKIE 1,109.67 EP 00003327 2013/04/22 l YOWELL,TIMOTHY A 3,069.14 Total for Entity: 691,812.03 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 04/24/: Report.CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 P7 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A F I F E P R O T E C T I O N D I S T R I C T Staff Report DATE May 1,2013 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R.Gillison,City Manager FROM Mike Bell, Fire Chief BY: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: FIRE AGENCIES INSURANCE RISK AUTHORITY (FAIRA) BOARD OF DIRECTORS ELECTION RECOMMENDATION Approval to fill existing vacancies on the Governing Board of Directors of the Fire Agencies Insurance Risk Authority of which the District is a Member agency. BACKGROUND The Fire District is an original member agency of the Fire Agencies Insurance Risk Authority (FAIRA). FAIRA operates as a 100 member Joint Powers Authority (JPA) providing member agencies general liability, property, and vehicle insurances through a pooled management strategy administered by the JPA. Consistent with the Joint Powers Authority Agreement for FAIRA, there are four (4) vacancies (expired terms) on the Authority Governing Board that must stand for election prior to July 1, 2013. Accordingly, the Fire District Governing Board is authorized as a member agency of FAIRA to cast a ballot for the election. There are five candidates running for election to the FAIRA Governing Board of which four are incumbents including the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Fire Chief. Under the current Board, FAIRA has performed admirably on behalf of the Fire District for many years. It is recommended that the Fire District Board authorize the Fire Chief to cast a ballot for the incumbents. Respe tfully submitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief I:\Clerical\Word Processing Docs\Staff Reports\FAIRA Election Ballot 2013.doc P8 BALLOT FAIRA MEMBER ELECTION BALLOT FOR GOVERNING BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, a member of FAIRA, hereby votes the following for four (4) of the individuals listed below, to represent the District, to fill the four (4) FAIRA Board of Directors positions effective July 1, 2013. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, has authorized the election by motion of the Board made and passed on May 1 2013. Mark the box for the candidate of choice. Title/Name Member Agency Chief Bill Paskle Alpine FPD Chief Richard Hutchinson Aromas Tri-County FPD Director JoAnn Gath Humboldt No. 1 FPD Director Pete Liebig Lakeside FPD El Chief Mike Bell Rancho Cucamonga FPD El Dated: 2013 Chairman of District/Authority Board or Designated Person ATTEST: District/Authority Board Clerk or Designated Person P9 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT' RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer Pam Pane, Management Analyst II 4� Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer' L04.2 Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND HELD IN LIEU OF A MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,871,000.46, FOR THE HELLMAN FIRE STATION (177) CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. FD10-006 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond held in lieu of a Maintenance Guarantee Bond, in the amount of $2,871,000.46, for the Hellman Fire Station (177) construction project, Contract No. FD10- 006. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: ASR Constructors Inc. 5230 Wilson Street Riverside, CA 92509 Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MASANS/PP/SH:ls P10 �q\NA DR HILL E RD ILL IDE i I SO AV WIL NAV JLSONkV QEECJJA BA Y N ST AV a � w w 1210 121 z � 121 OFR a w w a w > tt a V CTORI BASE LI K CHU CH S CHU CH S Y° < F OTHI BL y r w y 4 ARR W RT �p 0w TH ST y JERSEY BL m B H ST i a < HST > -- H ST r 6TH ST -- s a _ Q 4 Q 4TH S 12 r a w � I j I ICI Q 01 HILLSIDk RD 1 > > WILSON AV > j ! ----- m z ! W Q PROJECT Z 'i a O BANYANT ANYAN S +-----��----- -- - , Vicinity Map Hellman Fire Station (177) Construction Project (Hellman Ave south of Hillside Ave.) P11 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Fire Protection District Board John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Subject: APPROVAL OF AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 APPROPRIATIONS RECOMMENDATION It is requested that the Fire Protection District Board approve the attached Fiscal Year 2012/13 budgetary adjustments for all Fire Protection District funds. BACKGROUND When the budget development process begins, staff is actually projecting estimated appropriations fourteen to sixteen months ahead of anticipated needs. In general, the attached schedules adjust estimated expenditures to reflect a more current snapshot in all funds. Funding for items included in the adopted budget are increased or decreased to reflect more recent experience. Adjustments have been made for the reallocation of resources when a particular line item has not been fully expended and is utilized for another area of operations within a department's budget. Also included in the adjusted figures are two additional items: 1) funding for purchase orders that were carried over from fiscal year 2011/12; and 2) funding for various expenditures approved by the Fire Protection District Board (the Board) during the course of the current fiscal year. Annually, the Board adopts the amended appropriations. There has been no shift of estimated expenditures which deviates from the direction the Board has requested of staff. Capital improvement programs, as they are addressed, are approved as separate Board items throughout the year. The attached schedules submitted for your review indicate the prior year's budgeted revenues and expenditures, the current year's (2012/13) adopted budget amounts, and the 2012/13 amended budget amounts in each account area. Respectfully submitted, Tamara L. Layne Finance Director Attachments RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P12 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES SUMMARY BY ENTITY,FUND 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Fund/Description Budget Budget Budget 281 FIRE FUND 17,569,510 18,102,510 18,356,030 282 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST 85-1 6,410,270 6,520,070 7,077,560 283 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST 88-1 1,828,020 1,850,090 1,859,390 285 FIRE TECHNOLOGY FEE FUND 0 0 15,450 288 FIRE PROTECTION CAPITAL FUND 0 8,069,130 14,697,300 289 FIRE DISTRICT CAPITAL RESERVE 1,201,490 416,100 609,070 Total for RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 27,009,290 34,957,900 42,614,800 P13 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY,FUND,DIVISION 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Fund/Description Adopted Adopted Amended Division/Description Budget Budget Budget FIRE FUND(281) 501 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 2,809,380 3,684,670 3,943,310 502 COMMUNICATIONS 351,410 355,360 356,920 503 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 170,390 186,490 189,760 504 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 1,335,790 1,320,470 1,329,550 505 SUPPORT SERVICES-CITY 440,630 0 0 506 FIRE PREVENTION 698,430 809,890 802,740 508 FIRE SUPPRESSION 621,740 897,310 923,690 510 PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT 82,330 88,160 88,160 511 AMETHYST STATION 1,655,860 1,635,930 1,532,750 512 SAN BERNARDINO STATION 1,572,310 1,634,720 1,653,540 513 DAY CREEK STATION 184,770 0 0 514 JERSEY STATION 1,725,820 1,680,820 1,735,420 515 BANYAN STATION 3,421,690 3,333,720 3,287,780 517 HELLMAN STATION 1,644,650 1,611,230 1,619,620 525 COMMUNITY RELATIONS 27,590 28,490 28,490 527 VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 627,780 629,350 647,930 528 SPECIAL OPERATIONS 161,940 174,150 182,320 529 FIRE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 37,000 31,750 34,050 TOTAL FOR FIRE FUND: 17,569,510 18,102,510 18,356,030 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST 85-1(282) 501 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 1,206,140 1,383,780 1,991,900 502 COMMUNICATIONS 256,000 254,700 259,470 504 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 77,820 73,240 73,040 506 FIRE PREVENTION 463,290 89,720 92,050 508 FIRE SUPPRESSION 24,230 381,490 348,910 510 PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT 458,390 416,460 406,720 513 DAY CREEK STATION 1,685,710 1,736,040 1,714,160 514 JERSEY STATION 1,702,400 1,649,280 1,666,190 525 COMMUNITY RELATIONS 111,320 112,620 105,260 527 VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 392,970 394,360 387,350 529 FIRE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 32,000 28,380 32,510 TOTAL FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST 6,410,270 6,520,070 7,077,560 85-1: COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST 88-1 (283) 501 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 48,360 98,530 67,030 502 COMMUNICATIONS 63,990 63,490 64,880 516 EAST AVENUE STATION 1,699,670 1,675,140 1,713,190 529 FIRE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 16,000 12,930 14,290 TOTAL FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST 1,828,020 1,850,090 1,859,390 88-1: FIRE PROTECTION CAPITAL FUND(288) 501 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 0 5,685,000 3,011,540 FIRE DISTRICT CAPITAL RESERVE(289) 501 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 1,201,490 416,100 609,070 P14 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY,FUND,DIVISION 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Fund/Description Adopted Adopted Amended Division/Description Budget Budget Budget TOTAL FOR R.C.FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 27,009,290 32,573,770 30,913,590 FUND 281 FIRE FUND P16 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget FIRE FUND(281) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 11,978,990 11,867,340 11,888,760 4102-Property Taxes-CY Unsecured 542,920 547,350 547,350 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 460,840 454,840 417,470 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 262,630 335,800 300,000 4105 -Property Taxes-Supplemental 85,020 104,830 81,210 4106-Property Taxes-Unitary 394,830 445,330 470,340 4110-Homeowners Exemption 177,920 178,070 172,940 4112-Property Tax-Post RDA 0 2,466,380 2,465,930 4211 -Fire Permits 627,170 662,460 662,460 4302-Parking Citations 110 0 0 4309-False Alarm Fees 14,320 15,240 11,320 4313-Other Fines&Forfeitures 9,770 3,700 3,700 4316-Weed Abatement 0 34,600 34,600 4401 -Interest Earnings 78,870 30,700 17,410 4419-Other Rental/Lease Income 68,780 90,660 90,660 4501 -Plan Check Fees 34,990 36,190 36,190 4546-FSD Fees 680 140 140 4548-D.U.I.Recovery 300 280 280 4549-Hazmat Recovery 900 900 900 4551 -Fire Setters Recovery 500 500 500 4553 -Fire Maintenance Fees 5,670 4,490 4,490 4901 -Other Revenue 9,500 60,100 25,100 4905-Contributions/Fund Raising 3,500 3,000 3,000 4914-Non-Abated Reimbursements 66,030 138,560 301,680 4916-Reimbursement from OPEB Trust 607,610 441,210 441,210 8001 -Transfer In-General Fund 172,840 179,840 179,840 8288-Transfer In-Fund 288 0 0 188,560 8505-Transfer In-Fire Protectrt RDA 1,964,820 0 0 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 9,990 Total For Fund 281: 17,569,510 18,102,510 18,356,030 Total for RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 17,569,510 18,102,510 18,356,030 P17 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget FIRE FUND(281) 501 -FIRE ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 456,490 459,660 469,650 5005-Overtime Salaries 1,820 1,820 1,150 5010-Part Time Salaries 0 0 19,210 5030-Fringe Benefits 280,140 291,500 287,190 5032-Medical Insurance-Retired 712,980 850,310 850,310 5051 -Unemployment Insurance 0 0 18,500 5057-PEMHCA-Retiree 67,630 73,900 79,900 5060-Tuition Reimbursement 35,000 35,000 20,000 5100-Travel and Meetings 2,000 2,000 2,050 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 13,000 13,000 13,000 5151 -Postage 500 500 500 5152-Computer Software 230 0 0 5160-Membership Dues 960 1,120 1,270 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 1,100 1,210 1,210 5200-Operations&Maintenance 2,650 3,650 3,650 5300-Contract Services 86,130 81,480 93,970 5312-Legal Services 30,000 50,000 50,000 5400-Telephone Utilities 17,850 13,140 10,200 5401 -Gas Utilities 610 610 360 5402-Water Utilities 1,530 1,350 1,680 5403 -Electric Utilities 5,050 5,310 4,000 5416-General Liability Insurance 41,540 43,620 40,440 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 644,510 644,510 5503 -City Facilities Allocation 5,780 0 0 5509-Information Srvcs Allocation 17,200 0 0 5510-Property Tax Admin.Fee 192,050 205,660 170,840 5700-Interest Expense 0 130,530 200,970 5701 -Principal Repayments 0 129,260 199,020 5703 -Capital Lease Payment 0 0 1,260 5720-Misc Contributions to City 40,420 61,590 159,920 9283-Transfer Out-CFD 88-1 633,830 583,940 598,550 9289-Transfer Out-Fire Capital Rsry 162,890 0 0 Total Division: 501 2,809,380 3,684,670 3,943,310 502-COMMUNICATIONS 5160-Membership Dues 80 80 0 5220-Cellular Technology 23,830 27,430 23,110 5280-Equip Operations&Maint 7,500 7,500 7,500 5300-Contract Services 320,000 317,260 323,220 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 3,090 3,090 Total Division: 502 351,410 355,360 356,920 503 -EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 5000-Regular Salaries 86,830 84,500 84,500 5030-Fringe Benefits 48,610 43,940 43,510 5100-Travel and Meetings 6,000 8,000 8,000 5102-Training 7,500 6,000 11,000 5152-Computer Software 0 15,000 25,000 P18 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5160-Membership Dues 450 550 550 5200-Operations&Maintenance 21,000 28,500 17,200 Total Division: 503 170,390 186,490 189,760 504-EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 5000-Regular Salaries 612,140 611,130 613,290 5005-Overtime Salaries 195,170 195,310 240,510 5010-Part Time Salaries 29,450 23,920 23,920 5030-Fringe Benefits 331,720 255,770 251,520 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,300 1,600 1,600 5102-Training 5,200 6,700 13,000 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 1,700 2,500 3,700 5160-Membership Dues 360 330 580 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 400 390 390 5200-Operations&Maintenance 96,580 146,980 107,080 5285 -Safety Gear&Equipment 20,000 17,000 17,000 5300-Contract Services 29,800 29,800 29,800 5400-Telephone Utilities 1,580 1,580 500 5416-General Liability Insurance 10,390 10,910 10,110 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 16,550 16,550 Total Division: 504 1,335,790 1,320,470 1,329,550 505-SUPPORT SERVICES-CITY 5000-Regular Salaries 305,240 0 0 5030-Fringe Benefits 131,010 0 0 5102-Training 280 0 0 5105 -Mileage 600 0 0 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 3,000 0 0 5200-Operations&Maintenance 500 0 0 Total Division: 505 440,630 0 0 506-FIRE PREVENTION 5000-Regular Salaries 424,150 464,270 444,470 5005-Overtime Salaries 5,880 6,560 2,910 5010-Part Time Salaries 36,120 15,370 15,370 5030-Fringe Benefits 226,080 225,070 211,460 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,730 1,750 1,750 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 1,900 1,900 1,700 5160-Membership Dues 790 830 1,030 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 1,080 890 890 5285 -Safety Gear&Equipment 200 200 200 5291 -Equipment Supplies&Repairs 500 3,260 3,260 5300-Contract Services 0 62,000 91,910 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 27,790 27,790 Total Division: 506 698,430 809,890 802,740 Total Division: 507 0 0 0 508-FIRE SUPPRESSION 5000-Regular Salaries 221,350 345,890 345,890 5005 -Overtime Salaries 77,660 118,460 134,710 5010-Part Time Salaries 24,260 21,210 21,210 5030-Fringe Benefits 165,580 249,470 243,080 P19 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5100-Travel and Meetings 810 1,310 1,310 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 10,000 12,000 12,000 5160-Membership Dues 730 730 730 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 1,960 160 160 5200-Operations&Maintenance 7,630 7,630 7,630 5280-Equip Operations&Maint 2,350 2,350 2,350 5285 -Safety Gear&Equipment 61,000 31,140 31,140 5290-Specialized Tools&Equipment 19,350 12,550 16,190 5291 -Equipment Supplies&Repairs 20,560 3,360 16,240 5300-Contract Services 6,000 21,000 21,000 5321 -Fire Incident Costs 2,500 2,500 2,500 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 67,550 67,550 Total Division: 508 621,740 897,310 923,690 Total Division: 509 0 0 0 510-PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT 5102-Training 53,990 55,390 55,390 5160-Membership Dues 230 360 360 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 1,000 1,000 1,000 5200-Operations&Maintenance 3,000 6,000 6,000 5291 -Equipment Supplies&Repairs 10,300 10,300 10,300 5300-Contract Services 13,810 13,000 13,000 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 2,110 2,110 Total Division: 510 82,330 88,160 88,160 511 -AMETHYST STATION 5000-Regular Salaries 763,080 775,050 775,050 5005 -Overtime Salaries 259,910 261,180 174,320 5030-Fringe Benefits 600,680 530,650 516,570 5165 -Licenses,Permits&Fees 1,540 1,810 1,810 5200-Operations&Maintenance 4,000 4,000 4,000 5300-Contract Services 5,870 6,570 7,250 5400-Telephone Utilities 7,250 7,620 4,700 5401 -Gas Utilities 1,680 1,770 1,770 5402-Water Utilities 1,410 1,480 1,480 5403-Electric Utilities 10,440 10,970 10,970 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 34,830 34,830 Total Division: 511 1,655,860 1,635,930 1,532,750 512- SAN BERNARDINO STATION 5000-Regular Salaries 736,750 777,850 777,850 5005 -Overtime Salaries 255,880 266,640 299,060 5030-Fringe Benefits 557,400 533,850 519,480 5165 -Licenses,Permits&Fees 1,040 1,330 1,330 5200-Operations&Maintenance 4,000 4,000 4,000 5300-Contract Services 4,190 4,890 6,110 5400-Telephone Utilities 1,000 1,050 600 5401 -Gas Utilities 1,420 1,490 1,490 5402-Water Utilities 1,140 1,200 1,200 5403-Electric Utilities 9,490 9,970 9,970 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 32,450 32,450 P20 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 512 1,572,310 1,634,720 1,653,540 513 -DAY CREEK STATION 5000-Regular Salaries 84,080 0 0 5005-Overtime Salaries 29,560 0 0 5030-Fringe Benefits 71,130 0 0 Total Division: 513 184,770 0 0 514-JERSEY STATION 5000-Regular Salaries 797,500 791,920 791,920 5005 -Overtime Salaries 270,160 267,760 336,790 5030-Fringe Benefits 658,160 586,890 572,460 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 34,250 34,250 Total Division: 514 1,725,820 1,680,820 1,735,420 515 -BANYAN STATION 5000-Regular Salaries 1,556,810 1,536,570 1,536,570 5005-Overtime Salaries 537,100 571,960 551,870 5030-Fringe Benefits 1,233,890 1,087,000 1,058,330 5165 -Licenses,Permits&Fees 1,520 1,810 1,810 5200-Operations&Maintenance 6,000 6,000 6,000 5300-Contract Services 41,910 43,460 46,280 5400-Telephone Utilities 8,090 8,500 8,500 5401 -Gas Utilities 4,470 4,700 4,700 5402-Water Utilities 8,410 6,820 6,820 5403-Electric Utilities 23,490 24,670 24,670 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 42,230 42,230 Total Division: 515 3,421,690 3,333,720 3,287,780 517-HELLMAN STATION 5000-Regular Salaries 749,400 752,810 752,810 5005 -Overtime Salaries 259,400 260,200 286,820 5030-Fringe Benefits 610,010 527,960 513,940 5165-Licenses,Permits&Fees 1,220 1,810 1,810 5200-Operations&Maintenance 4,000 4,000 4,000 5300-Contract Services 4,820 6,670 7,460 5400-Telephone Utilities 5,630 10,500 7,700 5401 -Gas Utilities 890 1,690 990 5402-Water Utilities 2,500 3,100 1,600 5403 -Electric Utilities 6,780 11,210 11,210 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 31,280 31,280 Total Division: 517 1,644,650 1,611,230 1,619,620 Total Division: 522 0 0 0 Total Division: 523 0 0 0 Total Division: 524 0 0 0 525 -COMMUNITY RELATIONS 5152-Computer Software 280 0 0 5155 -public Relations/Educ Material 23,800 23,800 23,800 5160-Membership Dues 110 110 110 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 100 0 0 5200-Operations&Maintenance 800 0 0 P21 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5300-Contract Services 2,500 2,500 2,500 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 2,080 2,080 Total Division: 525 27,590 28,490 28,490 Total Division: 526 0 0 0 527-VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 5000-Regular Salaries 154,590 144,760 144,760 5005 -Overtime Salaries 15,600 15,600 15,360 5010-Part Time Salaries 13,750 13,550 8,550 5030-Fringe Benefits 100,540 94,330 90,840 5100-Travel and Meetings 240 240 240 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 830 830 830 5160-Membership Dues 260 260 260 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 430 430 430 5165-Licenses,Permits&Fees 1,520 2,080 2,080 5200-Operations&Maintenance 11,660 11,660 11,660 5250-Vehicle Operations&Maint. 139,860 139,860 149,630 5255 -Gasoline 29,870 30,770 38,030 5256-Diesel Fuel 88,800 91,480 98,330 5280-Equip Operations&Maint 12,000 12,000 12,000 5290-Specialized Tools&Equipment 6,270 6,270 6,270 5300-Contract Services 20,340 23,730 27,250 5401 -Gas Utilities 2,760 2,440 2,440 5402-Water Utilities 950 960 960 5403-Electric Utilities 21,320 19,560 19,560 5416-General Liability Insurance 6,190 2,660 2,570 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 15,880 15,880 Total Division: 527 627,780 629,350 647,930 528- SPECIAL OPERATIONS 5000-Regular Salaries 66,710 66,710 66,710 5005 -Overtime Salaries 26,030 23,620 32,020 5030-Fringe Benefits 36,910 28,100 27,870 5100-Travel and Meetings 200 200 200 5160-Membership Dues 280 280 500 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 100 100 100 5280-Equip Operations&Maint 1,250 1,250 1,250 5285- Safety Gear&Equipment 2,500 2,500 1,570 5290-Specialized Tools&Equipment 8,590 10,620 11,330 5291 -Equipment Supplies&Repairs 11,000 0 0 5300-Contract Services 5,870 36,300 36,300 5320-Hazardous Waste Removal 2,500 2,500 2,500 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 1,970 1,970 Total Division:528 161,940 174,150 182,320 529-FIRE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 5200-Operations&Maintenance 37,000 31,750 34,050 Total Division: 529 37,000 31,750 34,050 Total Division: 530 0 0 0 P22 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 281: 17,569,510 18,102,510 18,356,030 Total for RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 17,569,510 18,102,510 18,356,030 FUND 282 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 85- 1 P24 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST 85-1 (282) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 6,227,160 6,320,440 6,246,620 4103-Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 98,140 122,160 62,310 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int.- 19,830 22,570 22,570 4401 -Interest Earnings 51,540 40,300 22,160 4552-CFD Annexation Fees 3,600 4,600 3,600 4914-Non-Abated Reimbursements 10,000 10,000 30,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 690,300 Total For Fund 282: 6,410,270 6,520,070 7,077,560 Total for RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 6,410,270 6,520,070 7,077,560 P25 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST 85-1 (282) 501 -FIRE ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 643,330 639,850 609,590 5005-Overtime Salaries 49,530 49,530 56,470 5030-Fringe Benefits 404,230 415,080 385,930 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 13,690 13,690 13,690 5200_Operations&Maintenance 1,100 1,100 1,100 5300-Contract Services 52,720 53,880 199,630 5416-General Liability Insurance 41,540 43,630 40,440 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 27,920 27,920 5700-Interest Expense 0 54,280 0 5701 -Principal Repayments 0 53,760 0 5720-Misc Contributions to City 0 30,800 30,800 5725-Other Expenditures 0 0 626,330 9289-Transfer Out-Fire Capital Rsry 0 260 0 Total Division: 501 1,206,140 1,383,780 1,991,900 502-COMMUNICATIONS 5300-Contract Services 256,000 253,810 258,580 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 890 890 Total Division: 502 256,000 254,700 259,470 504-EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 5000-Regular Salaries 40,590 39,920 39,920 5010-Part Time Salaries 19,630 15,950 15,950 5030-Fringe Benefits 17,600 15,700 15,500 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 1,670 1,670 Total Division: 504 77,820 73,240 73,040 506-FIRE PREVENTION 5000-Regular Salaries 215,780 42,600 42,600 5005-Overtime Salaries 59,920 800 3,200 5010-Part Time Salaries 32,990 20,670 20,670 5030-Fringe Benefits 154,600 18,430 18,360 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 7,220 7,220 Total Division: 506 463,290 89,720 92,050 508-FIRE SUPPRESSION 5000-Regular Salaries 0 179,150 179,150 5005 -Overtime Salaries 0 61,000 31,530 5030-Fringe Benefits 0 126,300 123,010 5200-Operations&Maintenance 730 730 730 5215-0&M/Computer Equipment 0 0 1,250 5285-Safety Gear&Equipment 23,500 13,000 11,930 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 1,310 1,310 Total Division: 508 24,230 381,490 348,910 510-PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT 5000-Regular Salaries 258,470 245,700 249,300 5005-Overtime Salaries 5,720 5,940 600 5030-Fringe Benefits 194,200 157,490 149,490 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 7,330 7,330 P26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 510 458,390 416,460 406,720 513-DAY CREEK STATION 5000-Regular Salaries 753,780 791,150 791,150 5005-Overtime Salaries 258,490 268,920 262,090 5030-Fringe Benefits 611,680 574,470 559,980 5165-Licenses,Permits&Fees 1,800 1,830 1,830 5200-Operations&Maintenance 6,070 6,070 6,070 5300-Contract Services 11,840 13,540 14,180 5400-Telephone Utilities 8,520 8,950 8,950 5401 -Gas Utilities 3,360 3,530 2,330 5402-Water Utilities 5,990 4,780 4,780 5403-Electric Utilities 24,180 25,390 25,390 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 37,410 37,410 Total Division:513 1,685,710 1,736,040 1,714,160 514-JERSEY STATION 5000-Regular Salaries 748,980 746,390 746,390 5005-Overtime Salaries 262,010 258,550 301,340 5030-Fringe Benefits 587,860 528,240 514,300 5165 -Licenses,Permits&Fees 1,520 1,810 1,810 5200-Operations&Maintenance 8,760 8,760 8,760 5300-Contract Services 45,100 46,850 47,990 5400-Telephone Utilities 8,400 8,820 8,820 5401 -Gas Utilities 3,470 3,320 3,320 5402-Water Utilities 11,470 11,450 11,450 5403 -Electric Utilities 24,830 26,080 13,000 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 9,010 9,010 Total Division:514 1,702,400 1,649,280 1,666,190 Total Division: 515 0 0 0 Total Division: 523 0 0 0 525 -COMMUNITY RELATIONS 5000-Regular Salaries 69,130 70,440 70,440 5005-Overtime Salaries 0 0 2,050 5010-Part Time Salaries 12,130 10,840 5,420 5030-Fringe Benefits 30,060 28,060 24,070 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 3,280 3,280 Total Division: 525 111,320 112,620 105,260 527-VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 5000-Regular Salaries 109,760 106,280 106,280 5005-Overtime Salaries 11,770 11,770 8,890 5010-Part Time Salaries 13,750 13,550 8,550 5030-Fringe Benefits 86,010 86,750 84,110 5100-Travel and Meetings 120 120 120 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 420 420 420 5160-Membership Dues 140 140 140 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 220 220 220 5165 -Licenses,Permits&Fees 750 1,040 1,040 5200-Operations&Maintenance 5,840 5,840 5,840 5250-Vehicle Operations&Maint. 69,940 69,940 71,940 P27 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5255-Gasoline 14,930 15,160 15,160 5256-Diesel Fuel 44,400 45,060 45,290 5280-Equip Operations&Maint 6,000 6,000 6,000 5290-Specialized Tools&Equipment 3,130 3,130 3,130 5300-Contract Services 10,180 11,350 13,290 5401 -Gas Utilities 1,380 1,200 1,200 5402-Water Utilities 480 470 470 5403 -Electric Utilities 10,660 9,630 9,000 5416-General Liability Insurance 3,090 1,300 1,270 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 4,990 4,990 Total Division:527 392,970 394,360 387,350 529-FIRE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 5200-Operations&Maintenance 32,000 28,380 32,510 Total Division: 529 32,000 28,380 32,510 Total For Fund 282: 6,410,270 6,520,070 7,077,560 Total for RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 6,410,270 6,520,070 7,077,560 FUND 283 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88- 1 P29 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST 88-1 (283) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,106,730 1,199,570 1,216,050 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 63,090 41,470 24,480 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 12,870 13,990 7,900 4552-CFD Annexation Fees 1,500 1,120 1,120 4914-Non-Abated Reimbursements 10,000 10,000 10,000 8281 -Transfer In-Fire Fund 633,830 583,940 598,550 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 1,290 Total For Fund 283: 1,828,020 1,850,090 1,859,390 Total for RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 1,828,020 1,850,090 1,859,390 P30 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012113 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST 88-1 (283) 501 -FIRE ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 8,500 8,260 9,550 5030-Fringe Benefits 4,340 4,060 4,020 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 3,420 3,420 3,420 5200-Operations&Maintenance 550 550 550 5300-Contract Services 21,170 21,940 21,940 5416-General Liability Insurance 10,380 10,700 10,110 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 2,040 2,040 5700-Interest Expense 0 16,160 0 5701 -Principal Repayments 0 16,000 0 5720-Misc Contributions to City 0 15,400 15,400 Total Division: 501 48,360 98,530 67,030 502-COMMUNICATIONS 5300-Contract Services 63,990 63,260 64,650 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 230 230 Total Division:502 63,990 63,490 64,880 516-EAST AVENUE STATION 5000-Regular Salaries 780,960 779,280 779,280 5005-Overtime Salaries 266,640 265,350 319,280 5030-Fringe Benefits 607,630 575,150 560,840 5165-Licenses,Permits&Fees 1,240 1,830 1,830 5200-Operations&Maintenance 4,000 4,000 4,000 5300-Contract Services 8,300 9,570 9,980 5400-Telephone Utilities 11,250 11,820 9,840 5401 -Gas Utilities 1,770 1,860 1,860 5402-Water Utilities 4,780 5,020 5,020 5403-Electric Utilities 13,100 13,760 13,760 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 7,500 7,500 Total Division: 516 1,699,670 1,675,140 1,713,190 529-FIRE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 5200-Operations&Maintenance 16,000 12,930 14,290 Total Division: 529 16,000 12,930 14,290 Total For Fund 283: 1,828,020 1,850,090 1,859,390 Total for RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 1,828,020 1,850,090 1,859,390 FUND 285 FIRE TECHNOLOGY FEE FUND P32 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget FIRE TECHNOLOGY FEE FUND(285) 4517-Technology Fee-Permit 0 0 15,450 Total For Fund 285: 0 0 15,450 Total for RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 0 0 15,450 FUND 288 FIRE PROTECTION CAPITAL FUND P34 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget FIRE PROTECTION CAPITAL FUND(288) 4112-Property Tax-Post RDA 0 8,069,130 12,371,060 4113 -Property Tax-Post RDA Res Blc 0 0 2,255,720 4401 -Interest Earnings 0 0 70,520 Total For Fund 288: 0 8,069,130 14,697,300 Total for RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 0 8,069,130 14,697,300 P35 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget FIRE PROTECTION CAPITAL FUND(288) 501 -FIRE ADMINISTRATION 5102-Training 0 6,500 11,500 5152-Computer Software 0 1,080 24,710 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 0 1,800 1,800 5165-Licenses,Permits&Fees 0 0 13,900 5200-Operations&Maintenance 0 132,570 142,670 5207-O&M/Capital Supplies 0 419,000 51,560 5215-O&M/Computer Equipment 0 350 91,350 5240-Operation of Acquired Property 0 10,000 110,000 5250-Vehicle Operations&Maint. 0 50,000 50,000 5280-Equip Operations&Maint 0 6,900 6,900 5285 -Safety Gear&Equipment 0 16,000 16,000 5290-Specialized Tools&Equipment 0 15,200 15,200 5291 -Equipment Supplies&Repairs 0 29,500 29,500 5300-Contract Services 0 449,950 96,500 5312-Legal Services 0 5,000 5,000 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 14,080 14,080 5510-Property Tax Admin.Fee 0 116,870 0 5602-Capital Outlay-Bldg&Imprvmnt 0 1,451,500 0 5603-Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 404,000 20,000 5604-Capital Outlay-Vehicles 0 1,930,000 1,090,020 5605 -Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 0 24,700 3,590 5650-Capital Project 0 500,000 0 5720-Misc Contributions to City 0 100,000 100,000 9281 -Transfer Out-Fire Fund 0 0 188,560 9714-Transfer Out-Computer Resery 0 0 928,700 Total Division: 501 0 5,685,000 3,011,540 Total For Fund 288: 0 5,685,000 3,011,540 Total for RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 0 5,685,000 3,011,540 FUND 289 CAPITAL RESERVE FUND P37 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget FIRE DISTRICT CAPITAL RESERVE(289) 8281 -Transfer In-Fire Fund 162,890 0 0 8282-Transfer In-CFD 85-1 0 260 0 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 1,038,600 415,840 609,070 Total For Fund 289: 1,201,490 416,100 609,070 Total for RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 1,201,490 416,100 609,070 P38 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget FIRE DISTRICT CAPITAL RESERVE(289) 501 -FIRE ADMINISTRATION 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 50 200 670 5152-Computer Software 2,960 4,660 8,160 5200-Operations&Maintenance 50,690 50,200 55,070 5207-O&M/Capital Supplies 90,450 41,300 41,300 5215-O&M/Computer Equipment 1,260 8,620 20,190 5300-Contract Services 62,700 87,700 82,750 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 1,420 1,420 5600-Capital Outlay-Land 425,810 0 75,250 5602-Capital Outlay-Bldg&Imprvmnt 165,000 125,000 0 5603 -Capital Outlay-Equipment 233,500 25,000 0 5604-Capital Outlay-Vehicles 0 60,000 50,880 5605 -Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 0 12,000 430 5606-Capital Outlay-Fum/Fixtures 80,000 0 0 5650-Capital Project 38,800 0 272,950 5720-Misc Contributions to City 50,270 0 0 Total Division: 501 1,201,490 416,100 609,070 Total For Fund 289: 1,201,490 416,100 609,070 Total for RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 1,201,490 416,100 609,070 P39 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget FIRE DISTRICT CAPITAL RESERVE(289) 501 -FIRE ADMINISTRATION 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 50 200 670 5152-Computer Software 2,960 4,660 8,160 5200-Operations&Maintenance 50,690 50,200 55,070 5207-O&M/Capital Supplies 90,450 41,300 41,300 5215-O&M/Computer Equipment 1,260 8,620 20,190 5300-Contract Services 62,700 87,700 82,750 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 1,420 1,420 5600-Capital Outlay-Land 425,810 0 75,250 5602-Capital Outlay-Bldg&Imprvmnt 165,000 125,000 0 5603-Capital Outlay-Equipment 233,500 25,000 0 5604-Capital Outlay-Vehicles 0 60,000 50,880 5605-Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 0 12,000 430 5606-Capital Outlay-Fum/Fixtures 80,000 0 0 5650-Capital Project 38,800 0 272,950 5720-Misc Contributions to City 50,270 0 0 Total Division: 501 1,201,490 416,100 609,070 Total For Fund 289: 1,201,490 416,100 609,070 Total for RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: 1,201,490 416,100 609,070 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P40 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335317 2013/04/11 ( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 619.46 AP 00335317 2013/04/11 1 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 430.04 AP 00335317 2013/04/11 ( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 665.66 AP 00335317 2013/04/11 ( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 439.28 AP 00335317 2013/04/11 ( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,400.24 AP 00335317 2013/04/11 1 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,400.24 AP 00335317 2013/04/11 ( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 439.28 AP 00335333 2013/04/17( AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1,200.00 AP 00335335 2013/04/17( AGILINE LLC 80.00 AP 00335335 2013/04/17( AGILINE LLC 360.00 AP 00335337 2013/04/17( ALCON SIGNS 675.00 AP 00335339 2013/04/17( ALLEGRO CLASSICS LLC 9,448.91 AP 00335353 2013/04/171 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,STATE 4,158.50 AP 00335357 2013/04/171 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 166.00 AP 00335359 2013/04/17 l CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 AP 00335364 2013/04/17( CASCADE TURF LLC 75.39 AP 00335364 2013/04/17( CASCADE TURF LLC 272.39 AP 00335364 2013/04/17( CASCADE TURF LLC 40.46 AP 00335369 2013/04/171 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPA 79.40 AP 00335374 2013/04/17( DARWISH,LATIFA 43.00 AP 00335380 2013/04/17( ECHO FIRE PROTECTION CO. 114.04 AP 00335386 2013/04/17 ( EXCAL VISUAL LLP 1,006.75 AP 00335387 2013/04/171 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 292.00 AP 00335394 2013/04/171 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 74.40 AP 00335396 2013/04/17( GRIFFITH RADIATOR SALES 87.50 AP 00335428 2013/04/17( MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 725.00 AP 00335428 2013/04/17 l MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 684.00 AP 00335428 2013/04/171 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 285.00 AP 00335428 2013/04/171 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 175.00 AP 00335462 2013/04/17( RIPPETOE MILES LLP 148.80 AP 00335462 2013/04/17( RIPPETOE MILES LLP 6,054.85 AP 00335462 2013/04/17( RIPPETOE MILES LLP 601.99 AP 00335462 2013/04/17 l RIPPETOE MILES LLP 700.15 AP 00335462 2013/04/171 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 2,100.82 AP 00335464 2013/04/17 l ROBLES,RAUL P 105.00 AP 00335525 2013/04/17 l WEST SANITATION SERVICES INC 361.95 AP 00335127 2013/04/10( AVENDANO,KATRENA 4.00 AP 00335127 2013/04/10( AVENDANO,KATRENA 66.00 AP 00335194 2013/04/101 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 78.36 AP 00335194 2013/04/10 l HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 180.04 AP 00335194 2013/04/10( HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 25.24 AP 00335213 2013/04/10( LEAL,RUTH 28.80 AP 00335216 2013/04/101 LIPKA,TONY 75.00 AP 00335216 2013/04/10( LIPKA,TONY 75.00 AP 00335300 2013/04/10( WELLS FARGO BANK N A 2,300.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P41 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335301 2013/04/10( WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CREDIT 672.70 AP 00335301 2013/04/10( WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CREDIT 694.40 AP 00335376 2013/04/17( DELTA CARE USA 1,633.20 AP 00335405 2013/04/17( INPRO CORPORATION 688.51 AP 00335447 2013/04/171 PATTON SALES CORP 208.13 AP 00335447 2013/04/17( PATTON SALES CORP 35.58 AP 00335459 2013/04/17( RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICES INC 82.50 AP 00335459 2013/04/17 ( RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICES INC 170.00 AP 00335459 2013/04/17( RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICES INC 170.00 AP 00335459 2013/04/17 l RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICES INC 170.00 AP 00335459 2013/04/171 RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICES INC 160.00 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 30.94 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 20.41 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 15.90 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 1 BRODART BOOKS 42.08 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 37.09 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 9.54 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 92.17 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 19.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 12.74 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 19.40 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 13.56 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 110.77 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 85.52 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 214.83 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 74.24 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 127.08 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 106.15 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 f BRODART BOOKS 86.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 30.30 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 173.56 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 54.04 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 38.01 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 24.26 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 14.03 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 15.13 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 729 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 22222 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 2,175.42 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 166.88 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 361.24 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 41.50 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 83.29 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 10.66 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 60.77 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 04/24/: Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P42 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 12232 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 16.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 5.79 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 1842 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 9.55 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 138.63 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 13.56 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 24.30 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 9.54 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 162.65 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 170.31 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 21.86 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 I BRODART BOOKS 42.08 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 6.79 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 f BRODART BOOKS 165.10 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 19.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 14.60 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 14.01 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 15.71 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 24.30 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 38.15 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 14.04 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 27.22 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 148.17 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 126.30 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 66.57 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 22.31 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 20.41 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 15.69 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 1 BRODART BOOKS 57.22 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 13.11 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 610.03 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 41.50 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 1,650.60 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 10.66 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 1 BRODART BOOKS 10.18 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 312.67 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 765.86 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 40.77 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 16.51 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 14.59 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 30.30 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 60.77 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 90.47 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 25.21 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P43 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 27.20 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 25.26 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 14.59 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 68.45 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 75.22 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 106.15 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 48.55 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 23.23 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 17.45 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 14.59 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 29.55 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 16.26 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 26.20 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 28.14 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 93.56 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 2231 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 21.37 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 55.94 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 1 BRODART BOOKS 24.26 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 1 BRODART BOOKS 107.82 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 40.30 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 79.08 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 24.26 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 13.28 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 16.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 17.76 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 17.92 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 20.08 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 15.60 AP 00335319 2013/04/11 l KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA I 6.10 AP 00335319 2013/04/11 ( KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA L 234.93 AP 00335319 2013/04/11 ( KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA L 6.12 AP 00335319 2013/04/11 I KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA L -97.11 AP 00335319 2013/04/11 1 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA I 34.71 AP 00335319 2013/04/11 ( KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA L 97.11 AP 00335319 2013/04/11 ( KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA T 20.53 AP 00335319 2013/04/11 l KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA I 271.74 AP 00335327 2013/04/171 Al AUTOMOTIVE 199.59 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 f BRODART BOOKS 26.56 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 04/24/: Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P44 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum Ap 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 15.13 AP 00335312 2013/04/11 ( AIRGAS USA LLC 247.40 AP 00335312 2013/04/11 ( AIRGAS USA LLC 272.12 AP 00335477 2013/04/17( SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 30.51 AP 00335274 2013/04/10 l STEER N STEIN OF CUCAMONGA 74.25 AP 00335227 2013/04/10( MUSHARBASH,GHADA 15.00 AP 00335232 2013/04/101 NO SOLICITING 59.00 AP 00335134 2013/04/10 l BOOKE,CHRISTOPHER 1,755.00 AP 00335457 2013/04/17( RAMIREZ,CYNTHIA 50.00 Ap 00335457 2013/04/17( RAMIREZ,CYNTHIA 50.00 AP 00335457 2013/04/17( RAMIREZ,CYNTHIA 50.00 AP 00335262 2013/04/101 SCOTT,APRIL 167.40 AP 00335272 2013/04/101 SPAGNOLO, SAM 59.20 AP 00335272 2013/04/10( SPAGNOLO, SAM 53.68 Ap 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 42.90 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 17.41 Ap 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 84.65 AP 00335421 2013/04/17 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 57.34 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 188.84 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 98.12 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 53.62 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 350.30 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 35.66 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 11.02 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 8.70 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 30.54 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 160.08 Ap 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 1,656.53 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 101.57 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 128.21 AP 00335421 2013/04/17 1 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 33.65 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 113.49 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 178.84 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 92.62 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 188.79 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 154.40 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 50.82 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 55.86 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 2.85 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 94.51 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 51.28 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 18.91 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 18.40 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 167.24 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 34.74 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P45 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335154 2013/04/10( DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 65,469.05 AP 00335297 2013/04/10( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 85.27 AP 00335297 2013/04/10 l WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 96.82 AP 00335297 2013/04/101 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 1,386.35 AP 00335297 2013/04/101 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 413.78 AP 00335297 2013/04/10( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 870.48 AP 00335297 2013/04/10( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 573.71 AP 00335421 2013/04/17 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 11.07 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 26.11 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 48.62 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 6478 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 30.00 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 24.60 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 9728 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 25.30 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 61.45 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 41.52 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 9.20 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 120.31 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 137.07 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 39.04 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. -305.73 AP 00335421 2013/04/17 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 28.66 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 14.81 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 20722 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 12.03 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 17.81 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 58.69 AP 00335421 2013/04/17 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 31.67 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 93.20 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 62.76 AP 00335421 2013/04/17 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 15.43 AP 00335421 2013/04/17 f LOWES COMPANIES INC. 38.74 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 60.62 AP 00335421 2013/04/17 ( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 4862 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 26.51 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 172.75 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 115.05 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 56.86 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 42.34 AP 00335266 2013/04/10( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 328.81 AP 00335266 2013/04/101 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 754.57 AP 00335511 2013/04/17( UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 217.91 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 17.46 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 38.36 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P46 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. -10.97 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. -19.20 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 331.52 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 154.41 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 51.08 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 92.93 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 8588 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 199.92 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 154.04 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 47.15 AP 00335421 2013/04/17( LOWES COMPANIES INC. 102.01 AP 00335421 2013/04/17 l LOWES COMPANIES INC. 36.85 AP 00335421 2013/04/171 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 81.31 AP 00335500 2013/04/17( TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 1,987.03 AP 00335400 2013/04/17( HOSE MAN INC 18.61 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.86 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.43 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 334.74 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.18 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.62 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335505 2013/04/17( TOMARK SPORTS INC 345.02 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 53.28 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 71.69 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 51.44 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 39.84 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 I BRODART BOOKS 17.92 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODARTBOOKS 6.64 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 04/24/: Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P47 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00335269 2013/04/101 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335269 2013/04/101 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335269 2013/04/101 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.73 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.57 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.65 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 58.24 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 38.00 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 11.12 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 33.20 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 11.12 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 24.40 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 1 BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 f BRODART BOOKS 11.12 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 13.28 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 125.44 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 217.20 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 f BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 11.12 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 I BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 22.40 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.21 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 AP 00335269 2013/04/101 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 AP 00335269 2013/04/101 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P48 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.12 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.74 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.46 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.74 AP 00335269 2013/04/101 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.72 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 15.60 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 17.76 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODARTBOOKS 17.92 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 33.20 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 259.85 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 17.92 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 424.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 11.12 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 14.60 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 53.46 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 10.16 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 19.40 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 79.14 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 58.30 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 15.71 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 30.30 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 27.22 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 28.63 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 14.57 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 19.21 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 40.35 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 16.26 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.36 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7.05 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.55 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.02 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 Ap 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2478 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 18.46 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 26.20 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 122.17 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P49 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 100.75 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 22.09 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 1 BRODART BOOKS 33.98 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 29.73 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 2209 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 237.25 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 2323 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 1 BRODART BOOKS 13.28 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 35.52 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODARTBOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 17.92 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 34.01 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 92.29 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 77.72 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 17.50 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 26.36 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 22.84 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 19.92 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 105.20 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.24 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.99 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.01 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.51 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.31 AP 00335269 2013/04/101 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.67 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 482.38 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,090.67 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,017.10 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 AP 00335269 2013/04/101 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 581.12 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 8729 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 1 BRODART BOOKS 6.64 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 04/24/; Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P50 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 35.52 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 I BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 42.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 22.24 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 42.16 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 17.92 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 33.20 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 I BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 I BRODART BOOKS 154.16 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 17.92 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 1 BRODART BOOKS 38.00 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 ( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 22.40 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 I BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 84.65 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 1 BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00335536 2013/04/181 BRODART BOOKS 62.56 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 13.28 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 1 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335269 2013/04/101 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.58 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 153.78 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.12 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.10 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 979.49 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,848.15 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.11 AP 00335269 2013/04/101 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.76 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.40 AP 00335269 2013/04/10 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.38 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.71 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.25 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.94 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.39 AP 00335269 2013/04/10( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.60 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 46.56 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 I BRODART BOOKS 24.30 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 22.40 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 13.28 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 11 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P51 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00335536 2013/04/18( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00335536 2013/04/18 l BRODART BOOKS 111.80 AP 00335470 2013/04/17( SBPEA 744.33 AP 00335479 2013/04/171 SHRED IT 17.43 AP 00335479 2013/04/171 SHRED IT 17.43 AP 00335479 2013/04/17 l SHRED IT 17.43 AP 00335479 2013/04/17( SHRED IT 34.86 AP 00335481 2013/04/17 ( SIGMANET 18,478.80 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.82 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.03 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.67 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.05 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.67 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.65 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.44 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.76 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.77 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.59 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.46 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.93 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.42 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.34 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,101.16 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6872 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.60 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,619.59 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 989.12 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.74 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.58 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.45 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.74 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,851.41 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11,760.37 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,278.07 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8974 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15,925.34 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.13 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.50 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.27 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.79 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.61 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.64 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P52 Agenda Check Resister 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.67 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.88 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7,103.62 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 131.85 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.20 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.00 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5728 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.48 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.23 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.13 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.19 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2422 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.51 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.26 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.30 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.08 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.29 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,257.46 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.10 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.30 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.49 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.06 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.36 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.46 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.36 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.46 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.83 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8821 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.34 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 146.79 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.14 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 13 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P53 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.23 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.38 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10.14 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.17 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.91 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.46 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.45 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.87 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.33 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.23 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 152.17 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.78 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.46 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,241.56 Ap 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 600.92 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.73 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.48 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.24 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.86 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 696.59 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 612.23 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.59 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 14 Current Date: 04/24/; Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P54 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.22 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.50 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 277.15 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 428.57 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 242.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.22 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.99 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.22 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.74 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.26 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.81 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.06 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.15 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.67 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.31 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.01 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.38 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.19 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.16 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.04 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.53 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2387 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 424.44 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.79 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.23 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.04 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.78 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.67 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2472 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.79 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 15 Current Date: 04/24/: Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P55 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.24 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 347.71 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.06 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.24 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 186.61 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.06 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.24 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.02 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.39 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.26 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 194.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.26 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.79 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.38 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,054.42 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 146.90 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.12 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.82 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.08 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2232 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.33 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.20 AP 00335493 2013/04/171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.16 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.93 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 16 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P56 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.49 AP 00335493 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.52 AP 00335493 2013/04/17 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.72 AP 00335507 2013/04/17( TRINIDAD,RIO 25.00 AP 00335517 2013/04/171 VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS 1,090.92 AP 00335520 2013/04/171 VISTA PAINT 23.95 AP 00335520 2013/04/17( VISTA PAINT 279.51 AP 00335520 2013/04/17 l VISTA PAINT 186.95 AP 00335520 2013/04/17( VISTA PAINT 122.45 AP 00335520 2013/04/17 l VISTA PAINT 24.56 AP 00335527 2013/04/181 ABC LOCKSMITHS 12.96 AP 00335527 2013/04/18 l ABC LOCKSMITHS 33.48 AP 00335544 2013/04/18( EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 84.79 AP 00335544 2013/04/18 ( EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 218.27 AP 00335544 2013/04/181 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 432.54 AP 00335547 2013/04/18( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 51.59 AP 00335547 2013/04/18( INTERSTATE BATTERIES -159.98 AP 00335547 2013/04/18 ( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 168.09 AP 00335547 2013/04/181 INTERSTATE BATTERIES -20.07 AP 00335549 2013/04/18( LIMS AUTO INC 305.56 AP 00335550 2013/04/18( NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 487.00 AP 00335116 2013/04/10( AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 3,325.00 AP 00335116 2013/04/101 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1,400.00 AP 00335118 2013/04/10( AGUILERA, ISAIAH 64.86 AP 00335125 2013/04/10( ATRIUM PROFESSIONAL CENTER LLC 35.93 AP 00335144 2013/04/10( CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 16.20 AP 00335152 2013/04/10( DEALER ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS 533.25 AP 00335159 2013/04/10( E&L LANDSCAPE SERVICES 46.80 AP 00335166 2013/04/101 ERGON ASPHALT AND EMULSIONS 219.57 AP 00335172 2013/04/10( FRANCOIS-PIERRE COUTURE 256.83 AP 00335174 2013/04/10( FUSCOE ENGINEERINT INC. 50.00 AP 00335177 2013/04/10( GIBSON,CHERIE 925.00 AP 00335179 2013/04/101 GILMAN,JIM 400.00 AP 00335186 2013/04/10( H&G BEATON ENTERPRISES 89.10 AP 00335191 2013/04/10( HINOJOS,KERI 2,250.00 AP 00335203 2013/04/10( INMARK 166.25 AP 00335206 2013/04/101 JDC INC 30,336.00 AP 00335206 2013/04/10( JDC INC 4,500.00 AP 00335206 2013/04/101 JDC INC 4,500.00 AP 00335206 2013/04/10( JDC INC 20,708.50 AP 00335206 2013/04/10( JDC INC 4,026.10 AP 00335218 2013/04/10( MAIN STREET SIGNS 19,998.63 AP 00335218 2013/04/10( MAIN STREET SIGNS 215.95 AP 00335220 2013/04/10( MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 189.16 AP 00335222 2013/04/10( MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 71.34 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 17 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P57 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335222 2013/04/101 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 152.99 AP 00335222 2013/04/10( MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 40.79 AP 00335225 2013/04/10( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 42.93 AP 00335230 2013/04/10( NIMAKO,SOLOMON 141.25 AP 00335230 2013/04/101 NIMAKO, SOLOMON 50.85 AP 00335235 2013/04/10( OCLC INC 47.66 AP 00335242 2013/04/101 PCI PRODUCTS COMPANY 126.71 AP 00335247 2013/04/10( RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMER 37.50 AP 00335247 2013/04/10( RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMER 37.50 AP 00335247 2013/04/10( RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMER 37.50 AP 00335247 2013/04/101 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMER 37.50 AP 00335247 2013/04/101 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMER 37.50 AP 00335247 2013/04/10( RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMER 37.50 AP 00335247 2013/04/10( RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMER 37.50 AP 00335247 2013/04/10 l RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMER 37.50 AP 00335249 2013/04/101 RENT A CENTER#05915 46.06 AP 00335250 2013/04/10( RF WHITE CO INC 2,870.81 AP 00335252 2013/04/10( ROBLES,RAUL P 75.00 AP 00335252 2013/04/10( ROBLES,RAUL P 75.00 AP 00335259 2013/04/10( SC FUELS 14,302.03 AP 00335259 2013/04/10 l SC FUELS 15,493.85 AP 00335264 2013/04/10( SIMS,ROBERT 12.00 AP 00335270 2013/04/10( SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 1,012.00 AP 00335288 2013/04/101 UPS 24.39 AP 00335288 2013/04/10( UPS 99.99 AP 00335288 2013/04/10( UPS 56.44 AP 00335288 2013/04/10( UPS 39.00 AP 00335288 2013/04/10( UPS 88.00 AP 00335305 2013/04/10( WILSON AND BELL 234.71 AP 00335305 2013/04/10 l WILSON AND BELL 184.02 AP 00335552 2013/04/18 1 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,915.92 AP 00335552 2013/04/18 l SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,522.85 AP 00335552 2013/04/18( SIMPLOT PARTNERS 2,510.24 AP 00335552 2013/04/18( SIMPLOT PARTNERS 354.78 AP 00335553 2013/04/18 ( SUNRISE FORD 144.66 AP 00335553 2013/04/181 SUNRISE FORD 105.48 AP 00335554 2013/04/181 TW TELECOM 3,970.50 AP 00335554 2013/04/18( TW TELECOM 40.47 AP 00335555 2013/04/18( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 39.94 AP 00335555 2013/04/18 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 611.96 AP 00335555 2013/04/181 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 88.76 AP 00335113 2013/04/10( A&V SOFTBALL 2,775.00 AP 00335114 2013/04/10( ACE ELECTRIC INC. 93,500.00 AP 00335114 2013/04/10( ACE ELECTRIC INC. -4,675.00 AP 00335120 2013/04/10( AMAN NETWORKS 880.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 18 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P58 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335120 2013/04/10( AMAN NETWORKS 200.00 AP 00335120 2013/04/101 AMAN NETWORKS 25,626.24 AP 00335122 2013/04/10( ARANA,JONATHAN 412.80 AP 00335122 2013/04/10( ARANA,JONATHAN 232.20 AP 00335123 2013/04/10( ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 140.40 AP 00335131 2013/04/10( BERN MARIES PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 950.88 AP 00335133 2013/04/101 BLANCO,YVETTE 41.00 AP 00335136 2013/04/101 BPS TACTICAL INC. 358.56 AP 00335146 2013/04/101 CROCKETT,JADA 83.00 AP 00335149 2013/04/10( D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 363.42 AP 00335150 2013/04/10( DAWSON,CATHY 53.98 AP 00335167 2013/04/10( FASTENAL COMPANY 2.25 AP 00335169 2013/04/10( FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 1,700.00 AP 00335184 2013/04/10( GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 64.26 AP 00335188 2013/04/101 HARTE-HANKS SHOPPERS INC. 1,538.50 AP 00335190 2013/04/10( HILTI INC 805.00 AP 00335201 2013/04/10( INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES 1,250.00 AP 00335207 2013/04/10( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 127.61 AP 00335208 2013/04/10( K K WOODWORKING 17.26 AP 00335219 2013/04/10 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 113.65 AP 00335219 2013/04/101 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 47,372.00 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,754.44 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 186.83 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,753.00 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,192.15 AP 00335219 2013/04/101 MARB'OSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 62,271.50 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,508.31 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,988.67 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 304.52 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 12,197.13 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,511.22 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,111.08 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 8,959.50 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 108.00 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 108.00 AP 00335219 2013/04/10( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 68.95 AP 00335229 2013/04/10 l NEW HORIZON NUTACEUTICALS L L C 647.95 AP 00335237 2013/04/10 l OFFICE DEPOT 13.71 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 3.30 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 1.70 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 19.10 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 7.70 AP 00335237 2013/04/10 l OFFICE DEPOT 36.80 AP 00335237 2013/04/101 OFFICE DEPOT 388.61 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 61.62 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 19 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P59 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name _ Amoum AP 00335237 2013/04/10 l OFFICE DEPOT 409.63 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 34.54 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 15.89 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 143.63 AP 00335237 2013/04/10 l OFFICE DEPOT 53.95 AP 00335237 2013/04/101 OFFICE DEPOT 14.03 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 40.42 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 246.97 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 291.58 AP 00335237 2013/04/101 OFFICE DEPOT 199.18 AP 00335237 2013/04/101 OFFICE DEPOT 209.80 AP 00335237 2013/04/10 l OFFICE DEPOT 9.93 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 89.58 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 308.12 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 160.47 AP 00335237 2013/04/10 l OFFICE DEPOT 191.02 AP 00335237 2013/04/101 OFFICE DEPOT 34.96 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 14.83 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 186.56 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 78.18 AP 00335237 2013/04/10 l OFFICE DEPOT 21.58 AP 00335237 2013/04/10 l OFFICE DEPOT 21.63 AP 00335237 2013/04/10( OFFICE DEPOT 337.76 AP 00335240 2013/04/10( PATHFINDER CONSULTING 1,350.00 AP 00335255 2013/04/10( SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 100.00 AP 00335256 2013/04/10( SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DIST. 55,143.75 AP 00335260 2013/04/101 SCHULTZ,DAVE 100.00 AP 00335275 2013/04/101 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 91.55 AP 00335275 2013/04/10( STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 205.33 AP 00335275 2013/04/10( STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 699.97 AP 00335278 2013/04/10( SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 163.08 AP 00335279 2013/04/101 SWATER FLOW GROUP INC 91.80 AP 00335280 2013/04/101 TIGER DIRECT 2,683.04 AP 00335281 2013/04/10( TRAFFIC SAFETY WAREHOUSE 520.76 AP 00335284 2013/04/10( U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1,818.97 AP 00335285 2013/04/10( U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 31,136.66 AP 00335286 2013/04/10( UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 11,521.00 AP 00335292 2013/04/101 VAUGHN IRRIGATION SERVICES INC 269.11 AP 00335292 2013/04/10 l VAUGHN IRRIGATION SERVICES INC 1,520.00 AP 00335299 2013/04/10( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 37.97 AP 00335309 2013/04/10( XTREME DETAILING 150.00 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 263.42 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.22 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.22 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 232.61 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 20 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P60 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,465.31 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 677.09 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 242.01 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 t CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 245.63 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 116.66 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,750.40 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 132.86 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.75 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 115.04 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.32 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 42.11 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.10 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 106.94 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 163.27 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 115.04 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 223.94 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 275.85 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 207.01 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 186.34 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 202.15 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 59.03 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 166.51 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 251.41 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 227.70 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 143.10 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.00 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 65.84 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 62.60 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 162.82 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46.40 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 103.70 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 126.38 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.32 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 327.01 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 111.80 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 146.86 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 873.19 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 171.05 AP ' 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 187.77 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 179.47 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.75 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.02 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 225.82 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 21 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P61 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 100.46 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 108.30 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 169.75 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 65.84 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 106.42 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,340.29 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.98 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 134.16 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 72.58 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 164.89 AP 00335315 2013/04/11 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 56.12 AP 00335330 2013/04/17 ( ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 423.79 AP 00335346 2013/04/17( AUTO RESTORATORS INC 1,457.77 AP 00335347 2013/04/17( BEDKE,CHRIS 350.00 AP 00335348 2013/04/171 BISHOP COMPANY 21.65 AP 00335350 2013/04/17 l CAL QUEST INVESTIGATIONS 635.18 AP 00335354 2013/04/17( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 150.00 AP 00335355 2013/04/17( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 AP 00335360 2013/04/17( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 137.92 AP 00335366 2013/04/171 CIVICPLUS 700.00 AP 00335367 2013/04/17 l CONCEPTUAL SITE FURNISHINGS INC. 996.00 AP 00335367 2013/04/17( CONCEPTUAL SITE FURNISHINGS INC. 4,000.00 AP 00335378 2013/04/17( DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,THE 605.57 AP 00335382 2013/04/17( EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 185.33 AP 00335382 2013/04/17( EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 1,522.84 AP 00335382 2013/04/17( EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 221.40 AP 00335397 2013/04/17 l GUNSKI,GREG 19.00 AP 00335397 2013/04/17( GUNSKI, GREG 19.00 AP 00335397 2013/04/17( GUNSKI, GREG 19.00 AP 00335397 2013/04/17( GUNSKI, GREG 19.00 AP 00335399 2013/04/17 l HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 93.09 AP 00335399 2013/04/17( HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 31.03 AP 00335399 2013/04/17 l HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 109.13 AP 00335401 2013/04/17( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -25.37 AP 00335401 2013/04/17( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -50.74 AP 00335401 2013/04/17( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 40.77 AP 00335401 2013/04/17( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 137.09 AP 00335401 2013/04/17( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 40.78 AP 00335402 2013/04/17( INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIOT 2,638.75 AP 00335402 2013/04/17( INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIOI 3,079.50 AP 00335417 2013/04/17( LEDEZMA,ROSALVA 56.00 AP 00335418 2013/04/17( LGC SANTA BARBARA AT TERRA VISTA 15,000.00 AP 00335431 2013/04/17( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 48.44 AP 00335431 2013/04/17( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 116.25 AP 00335431 2013/04/17 l MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 599.44 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 22 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P62 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335431 2013/04/17( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 46.22 AP 00335431 2013/04/17 l MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 500.00 AP 00335431 2013/04/17( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 323.73 AP 00335440 2013/04/171 OPUS WEST CONSTRUTION CORP 1,500.00 AP 00335441 2013/04/17( ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 72.51 AP 00335442 2013/04/17( ORKIN PEST CONTROL 2,056.66 AP 00335450 2013/04/17 ( POUK AND STEINLE INC. 5,000.00 AP 00335468 2013/04/17( SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 172.00 AP 00335468 2013/04/17 I SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 156.00 AP 00335168 2013/04/10 l FELICIANO,ANTHONY 200.00 AP 00335189 2013/04/10( HDS WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 111.15 AP 00335202 2013/04/10( INLAND VALLEY GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION 275.00 AP 00335257 2013/04/10( SANBAG/SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVT 1,284.00 AP 00335277 2013/04/10( SUNBELT RENTALS INC 410.18 AP 00335398 2013/04/17( HI WAY SAFETY INC 2,022.40 AP 00335430 2013/04/171 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 498.25 AP 00335430 2013/04/17 l MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 1,555.88 AP 00335443 2013/04/17( PACIFIC TELEMANAGEMENT SERVICES 3,825.00 AP 00335495 2013/04/17( SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 877.00 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 41.14 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,721.54 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 568.21 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 89.12 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,881.30 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,043.43 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 219.95 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 430.81 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 182.58 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 197.62 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.08 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 444.47 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.71 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 151.93 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 261.54 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 161.90 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.83 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 356.69 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 176.23 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.98 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 517.40 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 221.59 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 176.23 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.70 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 264.57 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 413.09 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 23 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P63 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 152.50 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 208.63 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.02 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 43.16 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 111.80 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 292.88 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.76 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 279.61 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 195.67 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 248.38 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 169.75 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 62.79 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.52 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 155.17 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 292.77 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 166.51 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 70.70 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 422.49 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 103.70 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46.40 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 155.17 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.07 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 144.98 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 182.58 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 143.83 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 43.16 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.52 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 194.05 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 108.56 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 116.66 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 234.49 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.58 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 197.62 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 342.81 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 93.98 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 208.63 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 406.90 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 392.41 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 364.21 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 583.70 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 103.70 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.83 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 638.93 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 526.22 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 383.01 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 24 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P64 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335541 2013/04/18 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 228.85 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 203.77 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 988.11 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 641.14 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 197.29 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 520.25 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 467.61 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 272.09 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 482.65 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 341.65 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.78 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 8.00 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 784.79 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 714.07 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 678.71 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.14 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 614.62 AP 00335541 2013/04/18 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 275.85 AP 00335541 2013/04/181 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 669.87 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.08 AP 00335541 2013/04/18( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 539.48 AP 00335121 2013/04/101 ANTONI APPRAISAL SERVICES INC. 204.00 AP 00335130 2013/04/101 BERG,MARK 70.00 AP 00335130 2013/04/10 l BERG,MARK 45.00 AP 00335130 2013/04/10( BERG,MARK 16.50 AP 00335148 2013/04/10 l CUCAMONGA TOOL CO 103.53 AP 00335187 2013/04/101 HARMONY ARTISTS INC 2,400.00 AP 00335228 2013/04/101 NAPA AUTO PARTS 28.07 AP 00335283 2013/04/10 l TRANS WEST TRUCK CENTER 102.40 AP 00335283 2013/04/10( TRANS WEST TRUCK CENTER 136.77 AP 00335291 2013/04/10 l VASS,LASZLO AND MAUREEN 6,100.00 AP 00335293 2013/04/10( VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 0.80 AP 00335329 2013/04/171 ABM JANITORIAL SW 1,471.17 AP 00335329 2013/04/17 l ABM JANITORIAL SW 115.02 AP 00335329 2013/04/17( ABM JANITORIAL SW 115.02 AP 00335329 2013/04/17 l ABM JANITORIAL SW 153.37 AP 00335329 2013/04/171 ABM JANITORIAL SW 230.05 AP 00335329 2013/04/171 ABM JANITORIAL SW 306.73 AP 00335329 2013/04/17( ABM JANITORIAL SW 902.77 AP 00335329 2013/04/17( ABM JANITORIAL SW 356.88 AP 00335329 2013/04/17( ABM JANITORIAL SW 690.15 AP 00335329 2013/04/171 ABM JANITORIAL SW 766.83 AP 00335329 2013/04/171 ABM JANITORIAL SW 1,456.97 AP 00335329 2013/04/17( ABM JANITORIAL SW 1,073.56 AP 00335329 2013/04/17( ABM JANITORIAL SW 1,456.97 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 25 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P65 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335331 2013/04/17( ACTION CHEMICAL COMPANY 1,069.65 AP 00335377 2013/04/17( DMV RENEWAL 52.00 AP 00335381 2013/04/17 l ECOLAB INC. 361.20 AP 00335404 2013/04/17 l INLAND PRESORT&MAILING SERVICES 113.44 AP 00335404 2013/04/17 l INLAND PRESORT&MAILING SERVICES 80.12 AP 00335404 2013/04/17( INLAND PRESORT&MAILING SERVICES 103.63 AP 00335467 2013/04/17( SALDANA,VIVIAN 41.00 AP 00335469 2013/04/17( SAN BERNARDINO CTY DEPT OF PUBLIC WORK 49.59 AP 00335469 2013/04/17( SAN BERNARDINO CTY DEPT OF PUBLIC WORK 55.00 AP 00335472 2013/04/171 SCHAEFER,PAUL 280.70 AP 00335496 2013/04/17( SPARKLETTS 76.00 AP 00335498 2013/04/17 l STEUER,MARK A 590.00 AP 00335509 2013/04/17( UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 13,724.00 AP 00335509 2013/04/17( UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 10,306.00 AP 00335509 2013/04/171 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 3,680.00 AP 00335510 2013/04/17 l UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 650.48 AP 00335510 2013/04/17( UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 814.29 AP 00335510 2013/04/17( UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 650.48 AP 00335513 2013/04/17 ( UNIVERSAL TRUCK BODY INC 168.09 AP 00335528 2013/04/18 ( AIRGAS USA LLC 140.54 AP 00335528 2013/04/18( AIRGAS USA LLC 136.71 AP 00335528 2013/04/18( AIRGAS USA LLC 112.20 AP 00335537 2013/04/18( CALSENSE 314.70 AP 00335545 2013/04/18 1 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 123.24 AP 00335545 2013/04/181 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 125.00 AP 00335545 2013/04/18 I HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 657.50 AP 00335545 2013/04/18 l HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 125.00 AP 00335545 2013/04/18( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 576.99 AP 00335545 2013/04/18( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 152.06 AP 00335545 2013/04/18 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 123.81 AP 00335545 2013/04/181 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 743.12 AP 00335545 2013/04/18 l HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 123.82 AP 00335545 2013/04/18 l HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 570.75 AP 00335545 2013/04/18( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 125.00 AP 00335545 2013/04/18 1 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 61.62 AP 00335551 2013/04/181 NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 20,707.89 AP 00335551 2013/04/18 I NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 182.00 AP 00335115 2013/04/10 l ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 80.00 AP 00335115 2013/04/10( ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 1,181.46 AP 00335115 2013/04/10( ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 229.55 AP 00335126 2013/04/101 AUTO BODY 2000 39.99 AP 00335132 2013/04/101 BERNARD EDUCATION 594.00 AP 00335132 2013/04/10 I BERNARD EDUCATION 191.10 AP 00335132 2013/04/10( BERNARD EDUCATION 573.30 AP 00335132 2013/04/10( BERNARD EDUCATION 146.40 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 26 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P66 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335137 2013/04/10( CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 537.22 AP 00335137 2013/04/10( CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 537.22 AP 00335147 2013/04/10( CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 69.51 AP 00335147 2013/04/10( CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 751.88 AP 00335147 2013/04/10( CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 615.78 AP 00335163 2013/04/10( ELLISON-SCHNEIDER&HARRIS L.L.P. 252.00 AP 00335165 2013/04/101 ERAZO,ALEXANDER 52.25 AP 00335171 2013/04/10 1 FORD OF UPLAND INC 46.82 AP 00335171 2013/04/10( FORD OF UPLAND INC 1,402.25 AP 00335171 2013/04/10( FORD OF UPLAND INC 533.54 AP 00335171 2013/04/10( FORD OF UPLAND INC 425.57 AP 00335183 2013/04/10( GRAINGER 168.01 AP 00335183 2013/04/10( GRAINGER 26.93 AP 00335183 2013/04/10( GRAINGER -26.93 AP 00335183 2013/04/10( GRAINGER 864 AP 00335183 2013/04/10( GRAINGER 397.43 AP 00335185 2013/04/101 GUERRA,KELLY B. 2,300.00 AP 00335192 2013/04/101 HO, HEATHER 1,197.66 AP 00335195 2013/04/10( HOUSE OF RUTH 590.79 AP 00335199 2013/04/10( INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM 15.00 AP 00335204 2013/04/10( INPRO CORPORATION 253.30 AP 00335205 2013/04/10( INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 6,244.00 AP 00335215 2013/04/10( LIGHTFOOT,DEBBIE 214.32 AP 00335224 2013/04/101 MIDWEST TAPE 44.98 AP 00335224 2013/04/101 MIDWEST TAPE 31.98 AP 00335224 2013/04/10( MIDWEST TAPE 45.98 AP 00335224 2013/04/10( MIDWEST TAPE 23.99 AP 00335224 2013/04/10( MIDWEST TAPE 69.97 AP 00335224 2013/04/10( MIDWEST TAPE 45.98 AP 00335231 2013/04/10( NO 1 ASIA BUFFET 60.48 AP 00335234 2013/04/10( OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 146.76 AP 00335241 2013/04/10 l PATTON SALES CORP 61.56 AP 00335243 2013/04/101 PERERA, MICHELLE 54.00 AP 00335248 2013/04/10 l RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 63.99 AP 00335248 2013/04/10 l RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 22.41 AP 00335248 2013/04/10( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 8.64 AP 00335258 2013/04/10( SBCSD PUBLIC SAFETY REGIONAL TRAINING C' 2,200.00 AP 00335258 2013/04/10( SBCSD PUBLIC SAFETY REGIONAL TRAINING C' 4,125.00 AP 00335261 2013/04/101 SCMAF INLAND VALLEYS 1,050.00 AP 00335263 2013/04/101 SHORE POWER INC 106.11 AP 00335263 2013/04/10( SHORE POWER INC 705.00 AP 00335271 2013/04/10( SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 150.00 AP 00335273 2013/04/10( STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 3,040.80 AP 00335287 2013/04/10( UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 407.14 AP 00335290 2013/04/10( VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 27 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P67 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335290 2013/04/10 l VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 2,000.00 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.22 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.60 AP 00335295 2013/04/101 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.60 AP 00335295 2013/04/101 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.60 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.60 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 428.64 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 151.33 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 43.44 AP 00335295 2013/04/101 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 219.83 AP 00335295 2013/04/101 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 111.39 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.60 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 262.46 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 91.22 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 470.50 AP 00335295 2013/04/101 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.60 AP 00335295 2013/04/10 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 91.55 AP 00335295 2013/04/10 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 93.61 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 755.05 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.22 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.60 AP 00335295 2013/04/10 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.60 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.65 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.65 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.65 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 21.78 AP 00335295 2013/04/101 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.60 AP 00335295 2013/04/10 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 243.77 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 403.58 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.17 AP 00335295 2013/04/10 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.60 AP 00335295 2013/04/10 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.60 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.17 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.61 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.60 AP 00335295 2013/04/101 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 132.69 AP 00335295 2013/04/10 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 118.72 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1,780.55 AP 00335295 2013/04/10( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.22 AP 00335306 2013/04/10( WILSON,RYAN L 46.33 AP 00335313 2013/04/111 CALSENSE 1,895.09 AP 00335313 2013/04/11 ( CALSENSE 1,571.09 AP 00335313 2013/04/11 ( CALSENSE 1,571.09 AP 00335313 2013/04/11 ( CALSENSE 1,571.09 AP 00335328 2013/04/17( ABLETRONICS 380.16 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 28 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P68 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335332 2013/04/17( ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2,076.90 AP 00335341 2013/04/17( ALPHAGRAPHICS 57.09 AP 00335351 2013/04/17( CALBO 35.00 AP 00335352 2013/04/17( CALIFA LIBRARY GROUP 20,000.00 AP 00335356 2013/04/171 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 55.00 AP 00335358 2013/04/17( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00 AP 00335361 2013/04/17 l CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 175.37 AP 00335373 2013/04/17( D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 517.33 AP 00335373 2013/04/171 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 326.16 AP 00335373 2013/04/17( D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 363.42 AP 00335379 2013/04/17( EASY TO GET WIRELESS 1,562.00 AP 00335393 2013/04/171 GRANT,CHRIS L. 3,500.00 AP 00335395 2013/04/17( GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 345.60 AP 00335403 2013/04/17( INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOAR - 548.65 AP 00335403 2013/04/17 l INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOAR 742.58 AP 00335406 2013/04/17( INTEGRITY DOOR&HARDWARE INC 165.00 AP 00335406 2013/04/17 l INTEGRITY DOOR&HARDWARE INC 35.00 AP 00335406 2013/04/17( INTEGRITY DOOR&HARDWARE INC 795.48 AP 00335406 2013/04/17( INTEGRITY DOOR&HARDWARE INC 945.80 AP 00335406 2013/04/171 INTEGRITY DOOR&HARDWARE INC 531.92 AP 00335406 2013/04/17( INTEGRITY DOOR&HARDWARE INC 170.00 AP 00335406 2013/04/17( INTEGRITY DOOR&HARDWARE INC 1,095.94 AP 00335406 2013/04/17( INTEGRITY DOOR&HARDWARE INC 756.20 AP 00335422 2013/04/17 l MAIN STREET SIGNS 48.60 AP 00335422 2013/04/17( MAIN STREET SIGNS 501.71 AP 00335422 2013/04/171 MAIN STREET SIGNS 660.64 AP 00335429 2013/04/17( MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC&ELECTRONICS USA IN, 601.19 AP 00335429 2013/04/17( MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC&ELECTRONICS USA IN, 601.19 AP 00335444 2013/04/17( PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 AP 00335451 2013/04/17 ( PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 116.07 .AP 00335451 2013/04/17 l PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 11.40 AP 00335456 2013/04/17( R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 270.34 AP 00335456 2013/04/17 l R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 1,734.21 AP 00335456 2013/04/17( R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 372.94 AP 00335456 2013/04/171 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 152.00 AP 00335456 2013/04/17 1 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 450.05 AP 00335456 2013/04/171 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 74.66 AP 00335456 2013/04/17 l R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 43.06 AP 00335456 2013/04/17 l R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 129.29 AP 00335456 2013/04/17( R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 64.00 AP 00335456 2013/04/17( R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 162.47 AP 00335456 2013/04/17( R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 896.79 AP 00335456 2013/04/17( R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 2,273.29 AP 00335456 2013/04/17 l R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 66.29 AP 00335456 2013/04/17 f R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 555.70 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 29 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P69 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00335458 2013/04/17 l RAMIREZ,OLIVIA 500.00 AP 00335518 2013/04/171 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LP 1,059.69 AP 00335518 2013/04/17 l VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LP 482.40 AP 00335546 2013/04/18 l HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 745.21 AP 00335546 2013/04/18( HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 1,000.00 AP 00335546 2013/04/18( HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 720.99 AP 00335546 2013/04/18 ( HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 316.40 AP 00335117 2013/04/10( AFLAC 6,725.40 AP 00335145 2013/04/101 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 448.20 AP 00335151 2013/04/10( DAYANG TRANDS USA INC. 427.26 AP 00335200 2013/04/10( INLAND VALLEY APPRAISERS 100.00 AP 00335246 2013/04/101 R H F INC 85.00 AP 00335246 2013/04/10 l R H F INC 85.00 AP 00335246 2013/04/10( R H F INC 85.00 AP 00335246 2013/04/10( R H F INC 85.00 AP 00335246 2013/04/10( R H F INC 85.00 AP 00335246 2013/04/101 R H F INC 85.00 AP 00335246 2013/04/101 R H F INC 85.00 AP 00335246 2013/04/10( R H F INC 85.00 AP 00335246 2013/04/10( R H F INC 85.00 AP 00335282 2013/04/10( TRAK ENGINEERING INC 1,691.58 AP 00335282 2013/04/101 TRAK ENGINEERING INC -521.40 AP 00335289 2013/04/10( UTILIQUEST 817.15 AP 00335316 2013/04/11 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 801.54 AP 00335316 2013/04/11 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 740.29 AP 00335316 2013/04/11 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 687.00 AP 00335316 2013/04/11 1 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 125.00 AP 00335334 2013/04/171 AEI-CASC CONSULTING 12,695.93 AP 00335385 2013/04/17 l ESTRELLA,JOSE 450.00 AP 00335416 2013/04/17( LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 400.00 AP 00335435 2013/04/17( NEXTEL 896.71 AP 00335508 2013/04/17 l U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT INC. 174.98 AP 00335508 2013/04/171 U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT INC. 163.13 AP 00335508 2013/04/17 l U.S.LEGAL SUPPORT INC. 157.28 AP 00335512 2013/04/17( UNITED WAY 1.00 AP 00335512 2013/04/17( UNITED WAY 150.00 AP 00335519 2013/04/17( VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 AP 00335135 2013/04/10 l BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 1,449.74 AP 00335135 2013/04/101 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 2770 AP 00335153 2013/04/10( DECAUWER,DAVE 160.00 AP 00335221 2013/04/10( MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 71.93 AP 00335253 2013/04/10( RUBIO,RONDA 191.10 AP 00335298 2013/04/101 WARREN&CO INC,CARL 1,000.00 AP 00335311 2013/04/11 1 ABC LOCKSMITHS 43.18 AP 00335318 2013/04/11 ( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,315.20 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 30 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P70 Asenda Check Resister 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount Ap 00335324 2013/04/17( 909 MAGAZINE 550.00 Ap 00335414 2013/04/17( KX2 HOLDINGS 324.45 AP 00335463 2013/04/17 l ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 102.40 AP 00335463 2013/04/17 l ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 45.90 AP 00335478 2013/04/171 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 AP 00335480 2013/04/171 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 12,725.00 AP 00335480 2013/04/17( SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 5,778.00 AP 00335480 2013/04/17 l SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 1,019.24 AP 00335480 2013/04/17( SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 3,500.00 AP 00335480 2013/04/17( SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 23,534.09 AP 00335480 2013/04/17( SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 1,600.00 AP 00335480 2013/04/17 l SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 611.55 AP 00335480 2013/04/171 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 3,536.90 AP 00335480 2013/04/171 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 618.16 AP 00335480 2013/04/17 l SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 455.16 AP 00335480 2013/04/17( SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 774.27 AP 00335480 2013/04/17( SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 354.61 AP 00335480 2013/04/17( SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 618.16 AP 00335480 2013/04/171 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 631.93 AP 00335480 2013/04/17( SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 5,778.00 AP 00335480 2013/04/17( SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 1,019.24 AP 00335480 2013/04/17( SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 753.13 AP 00335480 2013/04/17( SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 480.91 AP 00335480 2013/04/17( SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 624.80 AP 00335480 2013/04/171 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 352.01 AP 00335482 2013/04/17( SIGN SHOP,THE 29.16 AP 00335494 2013/04/17( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.57 AP 00335499 2013/04/17( SWEET, STACY 250.00 AP 00335514 2013/04/17( UTILIQUEST 1,149.55 AP 00335526 2013/04/17( ZEE MEDICAL INC 141.95 AP 00335473 2013/04/17( SELLERS,JARED 500.00 AP 00335475 2013/04/17( SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 AP 00335476 2013/04/17( SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 397.34 AP 00335484 2013/04/17( SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 800.00 AP 00335484 2013/04/171 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 2,000.00 AP 00335486 2013/04/171 SOUTH PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP 225.00 AP 00335503 2013/04/17( TIGER DIRECT 101.96 AP 00335503 2013/04/17( TIGER DIRECT 204.05 AP 00335503 2013/04/17( TIGER DIRECT 101.96 AP 00335503 2013/04/17( TIGER DIRECT 101.96 AP 00335503 2013/04/17( TIGER DIRECT 234.24 AP 00335503 2013/04/17( TIGER DIRECT 492.21 AP 00335506 2013/04/171 TRENCH SHORING COMPANY 467.50 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 665.26 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 197.02 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 31 Current Date: 04/24/: Report;CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P71 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.61 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 141.65 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.14 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 3,191.06 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.11 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 79.99 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 136.55 AP 00335516 2013/04/17 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 80.13 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 50.64 AP 00335516 2013/04/17 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 8872 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.22 AP 00335516 2013/04/17 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 46.27 AP 00335516 2013/04/17 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 63.48 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 221.74 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 50.38 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.22 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 26.84 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 21.77 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 26.84 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.22 AP 00335516 2013/04/17 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 21.81 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.61 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 70.12 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 46.14 AP 00335516 2013/04/17 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 8.11 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.62 Ap 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 141.65 AP 00335516 2013/04/17 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 50.17 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 181.63 Ap 00335516 2013/04/17 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 93.39 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 185.10 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.60 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 50.30 AP 00335516 2013/04/17 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 92.64 Ap 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.17 Ap 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 39.13 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.48 AP 00335516 2013/04/17 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 94.92 Ap 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.50 Ap 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 55.73 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 55.73 AP 00335516 2013/04/171 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 49.26 AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 47.61 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 32 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P72 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335516 2013/04/17( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 25.15 AP 00335522 2013/04/17( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 422.71 AP 00335522 2013/04/17( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 213.52 AP 00335522 2013/04/17( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 31.90 AP 00335523 2013/04/17 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 43.51 AP 00335523 2013/04/171 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,155.65 AP 00335523 2013/04/171 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 270.05 AP 00335523 2013/04/17( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 84.09 AP 00335543 2013/04/18( DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 273.88 AP 00335543 2013/04/18( DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 116.53 AP 00335543 2013/04/18 ( DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 116.53 AP 00335548 2013/04/18( KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA r. 518.50 AP 00335548 2013/04/18( KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA I 518.50 AP 00335128 2013/04/10( BALDY FIRE AND SAFETY 105.00 AP 00335129 2013/04/10( BELCZAK AND SONS INC 75,357.50 AP 00335129 2013/04/10( BELCZAK AND SONS INC 10,065.68 AP 00335129 2013/04/10( BELCZAK AND SONS INC 284,084.15 AP 00335138 2013/04/10( CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITE 725.70 AP 00335139 2013/04/10( CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 718.00 AP 00335140 2013/04/10( CANTEEN VENDING SERVICES 39.14 AP 00335141 2013/04/10 l CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 110.00 AP 00335141 2013/04/10( CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 4.99 AP 00335141 2013/04/10( CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 21.59 AP 00335141 2013/04/10( CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 53.35 AP 00335141 2013/04/10( CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 404.98 AP 00335141 2013/04/10( CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 44.32 AP 00335141 2013/04/101 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 452.58 AP 00335141 2013/04/101 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 218.41 AP 00335141 2013/04/10( CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 91.71 AP 00335141 2013/04/10( CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 58.12 AP 00335141 2013/04/10( CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 33.87 AP 00335155 2013/04/101 DEMPSTER,KERI 91.50 AP 00335156 2013/04/10 1 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 2,817.00 AP 00335156 2013/04/10 l DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION -140.85 AP 00335160 2013/04/10( ECOLAB INC. 171.86 AP 00335161 2013/04/10( EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 187.05 AP 00335161 2013/04/10( EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 1,469.92 AP 00335175 2013/04/10( G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 453.70 AP 00335175 2013/04/10( G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 3,074.28 AP 00335176 2013/04/10( GATEWAY ACCEPTANCE COMPANY 4,102.03 AP 00335178 2013/04/10( GIBSON, GAIL 15.00 AP 00335180 2013/04/10 l GOOD YEAR WHOLESALE 621.76 AP 00335180 2013/04/10( GOOD YEAR WHOLESALE 486.43 AP 00335181 2013/04/10( GOODWIN,MARC 351.00 AP 00335182 2013/04/101 GOOGLE CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS 25.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 33 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P73 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335197 2013/04/10( I A A P 25.00 AP 00335197 2013/04/101 I A A P 25.00 AP 00335197 2013/04/101 I A A P 25.00 AP 00335198 2013/04/10 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -70.25 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -8.74 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 26.57 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 29.98 AP 00335198 2013/04/10 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 8.74 AP 00335198 2013/04/10 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 8.74 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 11.69 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 96.01 AP 00335198 2013/04/101 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 41.91 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 11.72 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 8.55 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 19.41 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 6.55 AP 00335198 2013/04/10 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 206.32 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 76.55 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 24.60 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 206.32 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 24.32 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 176.38 AP 00335198 2013/04/10( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 70.09 AP 00335198 2013/04/101 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 87.81 AP 00335198 2013/04/101 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 18.20 AP 00335198 2013/04/10 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 11.69 AP 00335209 2013/04/10( KAVAK,FUAT J 1,174.00 AP 00335210 2013/04/10( KIM, SOO-HYUN 13.00 AP 00335214 2013/04/10( LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 2,186.50 AP 00335214 2013/04/101 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 380.00 AP 00335214 2013/04/10( LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 391.33 AP 00335217 2013/04/10( LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 150.00 AP 00335226 2013/04/10( MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT INC 135.64 AP 00335233 2013/04/10( NWOSU,LORETHA 40.68 AP 00335239 2013/04/10( PAREDES,MICHAEL 55.00 AP 00335245 2013/04/10( PROVO ENGINEERING 2,957.00 AP 00335245 2013/04/10( PROVO ENGINEERING 2,194.00 AP 00335267 2013/04/10( SOURCE GRAPHICS 89.52 AP 00335302 2013/04/10( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 214.83 AP 00335302 2013/04/10 l WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 196.60 AP 00335303 2013/04/10( WESTERMOE,MARK 216.00 AP 00335304 2013/04/10( WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 3,943.00 AP 00335308 2013/04/10( XL STORAGE 895.00 AP 00335321 2013/04/11 1 NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 1,892.57 AP 00335321 2013/04/11 ( NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 267.43 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 34 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P74 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335322 2013/04/11 ( TW TELECOM 3,970.50 AP 00335342 2013/04/17 l AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 250.37 AP 00335342 2013/04/171 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 220.24 AP 00335342 2013/04/17( AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 270.46 AP 00335343 2013/04/17( ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP 00335344 2013/04/17( ASCE 50.00 AP 00335345 2013/04/17( AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 85.56 AP 00335345 2013/04/171 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 75.38 AP 00335345 2013/04/17 l AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 70.48 AP 00335362 2013/04/17( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 120.00 AP 00335363 2013/04/17( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 10.86 AP 00335365 2013/04/17( CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 111.63 AP 00335375 2013/04/171 DECAUWER,DAVE 17.50 AP 00335389 2013/04/17 l GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCTS 571.32 AP 00335390 2013/04/17( GOOD YEAR SOCCER LEAGUE 580.00 AP 00335391 2013/04/17( GOOD YEAR WHOLESALE 1,230.17 AP 00335392 2013/04/171 GRAINGER 55.17 AP 00335392 2013/04/17( GRAINGER 510.47 AP 00335392 2013/04/17( GRAINGER 48.92 AP 00335392 2013/04/17( GRAINGER 16.88 AP 00335392 2013/04/171 GRAINGER 306.91 AP 00335409 2013/04/171 JDC INC 2,923.00 AP 00335410 2013/04/17( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 999.23 AP 00335410 2013/04/17( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 18.08 AP 00335410 2013/04/171 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 43.18 AP 00335411 2013/04/171 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 1,957.50 AP 00335411 2013/04/171 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 2,919.50 AP 00335411 2013/04/17 I JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 12,368.50 AP 00335411 2013/04/17( JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 7,644.57 AP 00335412 2013/04/17( KHAN,TOSEEF 43.00 AP 00335424 2013/04/17 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,979.39 AP 00335424 2013/04/17 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,891.18 AP 00335424 2013/04/17( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,127.56 AP 00335426 2013/04/17( MATERIAL SALES UNLIMITED 1,003.20 AP 00335426 2013/04/171 MATERIAL SALES UNLIMITED 739.01 AP 00335426 2013/04/171 MATERIAL SALES UNLIMITED 283.50 AP 00335427 2013/04/17( MC TRUCKING 1,186.46 AP 00335436 2013/04/17( OAKVIEW CONSTRUCTORS INC 101,073.65 AP 00335436 2013/04/17 ( OAKVIEW CONSTRUCTORS INC 164,918.50 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 l OFFICE DEPOT 14.03 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 I OFFICE DEPOT 70.09 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 l OFFICE DEPOT 261.98 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 40.42 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 ( OFFICE DEPOT 2.30 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 l OFFICE DEPOT 6.23 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 35 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P75 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 19.70 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 29.50 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 44.61 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 34.46 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 I OFFICE DEPOT 62.56 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 l OFFICE DEPOT 11.79 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 10.35 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 25.05 AP 00335438 2013/04/171 OFFICE DEPOT 219.28 AP 00335438 2013/04117 l OFFICE DEPOT 20.10 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 15.23 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 708.20 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 11.10 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 28.06 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 40.91 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 l OFFICE DEPOT 7.55 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 43.52 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 l OFFICE DEPOT 31.92 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 2.57 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 l OFFICE DEPOT 61.62 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 7.77 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 ( OFFICE DEPOT 41.07 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 l OFFICE DEPOT 16.04 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 I OFFICE DEPOT 2.47 AP 00335438 2013/04/17 l OFFICE DEPOT 27.55 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 69.63 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 25.67 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 420.08 AP 00335438 2013/04/17( OFFICE DEPOT 24.34 AP 00335446 2013/04/17( PARS 3,500.00 AP 00335448 2013/04/171 PAZ,LORENA 6.00 AP 00335449 2013/04/171 PEPSI-COLA 680.40 AP 00335452 2013/04/17( PRES-TEK PLASTICS, INC 5,000.00 AP 00335453 2013/04/17( PRO SALES GROUP INC 603.00 AP 00335460 2013/04/17( RANCHO ETIWANDA 685 LLC 44,795.00 AP 00335461 2013/04/17 l RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 21.33 AP 00335461 2013/04/17( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 267.84 AP 00335461 2013/04/17 l RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 149.80 AP 00335461 2013/04/17( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 48.06 AP 00335461 2013/04/17( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 70.70 AP 00335461 2013/04/17 l RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 3.78 AP 00335485 2013/04/17( SOLARMAX TECHNOLOGY INC 3,868.06 AP 00335524 2013/04/17( WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 134.31 AP 00335524 2013/04/17( WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 38.22 AP 00335542 2013/04/18 ( DEKRA-LITE INDUSTRIES INC 1,813.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 36 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P76 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00335158 2013/04/10( DREAM SHAPERS 21.00 AP 00335238 2013/04/10( PACHECO,ART 1,755.00 AP 00335251 2013/04/101 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,585.25 AP 00335251 2013/04/10 l RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 6,646.89 AP 00335251 2013/04/10( RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,441.20 AP 00335251 2013/04/10( RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 35,624.09 AP 00335251 2013/04/10( RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,418.50 AP 00335251 2013/04/101 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,248.80 AP 00335251 2013/04/101 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 14,752.52 AP 00335326 2013/04/171 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 20.00 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,022.54 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,361.36 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 20.00 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 l A AND R TIRE SERVICE 229.31 AP 00335326 2013/04/171 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 19.47 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 l A AND R TIRE SERVICE 42.07 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE -42.07 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 42.07 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 19.47 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 38.93 AP 00335326 2013/04/171 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 982.31 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 l A AND R TIRE SERVICE 19.47 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 271.84 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 ( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 178.25 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 l A AND R TIRE SERVICE 784.34 AP 00335326 2013/04/171 A AND R TIRE SERVICE -15.00 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 l A AND R TIRE SERVICE -15.00 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 l A AND R TIRE SERVICE 19.47 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 58.93 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 167.85 AP 00335326 2013/04/171 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 291.07 AP 00335326 2013/04/171 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 295.42 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 l A AND R TIRE SERVICE 505.69 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 19.47 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 4207 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 l A AND R TIRE SERVICE 229.52 AP 00335326 2013/04/171 A AND R TIRE SERVICE -7.50 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 l A AND R TIRE SERVICE 81.00 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 19.47 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 ( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 81.00 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 1 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 571.12 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 I A AND R TIRE SERVICE 388.70 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 l A AND R TIRE SERVICE 19.47 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 20.00 AP 00335326 2013/04/17 ( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 42.07 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 37 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P77 Agenda Check Register 4/10/2013 through 4/23/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 7786 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 19.47 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 42.07 AP 00335326 2013/04/17( A AND R TIRE SERVICE 42.07 AP 00335338 2013/04/17( ALL WELDING 213.60 AP 00335370 2013/04/17( CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 872.87 AP 00335370 2013/04/17 l CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 1,158.67 AP 00335370 2013/04/17( CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 133.89 AP 00335439 2013/04/17( ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 71.28 AP 00335455 2013/04/171 QUAN,JENNIFER 70.00 AP 00335474 2013/04/17 l SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 25.00 AP 00335143 2013/04/10( CASTILLO,MICHAEL 100.00 AP 00335162 2013/04/10( EL POLLO LOCO RESTAURANT 74.92 AP 00335211 2013/04/10( KIRK,LAUREN N 150.75 AP 00335244 2013/04/10 I POLLARD PILOT SERVICE 59.13 AP 00335372 2013/04/17 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 8.00 AP 00335423 2013/04/17( MANSFIELD GAS EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 255.00 EP 00003270 2013/04/17( CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMOI 7,075.00 EP 00003270 2013/04/17 l CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMOI 1,480.00 EP 00003272 2013/04/171 RCPFA 9,534.06 EP 00003274 2013/04/17( VIASYN INC 3,184.00 EP 00003275 2013/04/17( EXELON GENERATION CO.LLC. 21,592.76 EP 00003268 2013/04/10( SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 175,837.20 EP 00003268 2013/04/101 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 5,550.00 EP 00003271 2013/04/17 I FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC 124,891.43 EP 00003271 2013/04/17 l FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC 110,804.97 EP 00003273 2013/04/17( RIVERSIDE,CITY OF 6,052.00 Total for Entity: 2,527,934.93 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 38 Current Date: 04/24/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13:3 P78 STAFF REPORT - CONINIUNM'SERVICES DEPARTMENT � Date: May 1, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director �/ ,, By: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planned �/r � Subject: AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CENTRAL PARK PAVILION PROJECT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Central Park Pavilion Project. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In April 2012, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors awarded the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a grant in the amount of $250,000 for the purposes of providing a multi-purpose outdoor activity pavilion, to provide activity space for outdoor recreation activities, exercise programs, special event programming and the Pacific Electric Trail (PET) event staging. In November 2012, the City hired RJM Design Group, master architect for Central Park, to prepare plans and specifications for this new amenity. Construction drawings have now been prepared and include the addition of a 2,240 sq. ft. covered picnic shelter (hex shelter at 1,040 sq. ft. and 2 wings at 600 sq. ft. ea.), as well as landscape and hardscape modifications. The architect's estimate for the improvements is $297,550, and the remaining funds will come from Fund 120 Park Development. The pavilion will be located adjacent to the park's outdoor grass special event area, Brulte Senior Center, Lewis Community Center and close to the PET entry (see attached plan). It is anticipated that the project will be completed by late Fall of 2013. Respectfully submitted, Nettie Nielsen Community Services Director attachment e �v Proposed Outdoor Activity Pavilion Site ' V® m 4 f # # # bb - � Y b # P80 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "THE CENTRAL PARK PAVILION PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "THE CENTRAL PARK PAVILION PROJECT ". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on May 30, 2013, sealed bids or proposals for the "THE CENTRAL PARK PAVILION PROJECT" in said City. A pre-bid meeting is scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on May 22, 2013, at 11200 Base Line Road. This meeting is to allow bidder's an opportunity to view the project site. Bidders' attendance at this meeting is a prerequisite for providing a bid for the job. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the "THE CENTRAL PARK PAVILION PROJECT ". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department Resolution No. - Page 1 of 4 May 1,3013 City Council Meeting-Item L3(Page P80).Authorization to advertise the"Notice Inviting Bids"for the Central Park Pavilion Project. Resolution No. 13-044 Title printing in the Agenda was incorrect. The corrected Resolution No. 13-044 Title is below. RESOLUTION NO. 13-044 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "THE CENTRAL PARK PAVILION PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "THE CENTRAL PARK PAVILION PROJECT". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" • Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on May 30, 2013, sealed bids or proposals for the "THE CENTRAL PARK PAVILION PROJECT" in said City. A pre-bid meeting is scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on May 22, 2013, at 11200 Base Line Road. This meeting is to allow bidder's an opportunity to view the project site. Bidders' attendance at this meeting is a prerequisite for providing a bid for the job. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. • Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the 'THE CENTRAL PARK PAVILION PROJECT'. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which,the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. They can also be found at www.dir.ca.gov/ under the. "Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor,shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if, such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general .prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions•in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: . A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of . • certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices,in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1130 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or . D. •When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. - The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs- if he employs registered apprentices or .journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. • Resolution No. 13-044 - Page 2 of 5 The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said • work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to, a Class "B" License (General Building Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. In an effort to go green and paperless, digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal, including any future addenda or revisions to the bid documents, are available by going to www.ciplist.com and signing up, by going to Member Login or Member Signup (it's free), then choose California, then scroll down to San Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities, then scroll down to Rancho Cucamdnga and click on City Projects, then click on the Project of interest under the Title and follow directions for download. Note, copies of the plans, specifications, bid proposal, addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from the above website then printed. Resolution No. 13-044- Page 3 of 5 Prospective bidders must register for an account on www.ciplist.com to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s) and to receive email updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained on.this site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to • the bid documents, it is the responsibility of each prospective bidder to register with www.ciplist.com and to check this website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to registered prospective bidders from www.ciplist.com. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. - In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "THE CENTRAL PARK- PAVILION PROJECT" may be directed to: • KAREN MCGUIRE-EMERY .10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2760, ext. 2205 _ ADVERTISE ON: May 7 and 15, 2013 • Please see the following page for formal adoption,certification and signatures Resolution No. 13-044 - Page 4 of 5 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15` day of May 2013. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 1st day of May 2013. Executed this 2ntl day of May 2013, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Resolution No. 13-044 - Page 5 of 5 P81 of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. They can also be found at www.dir.ca.gov/ under the "Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as Resolution No. - Page 2 of 4 P82 amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to, a Class "B" License (General Building Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in.the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. In an effort to go green and paperless, digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal, including any future addenda or revisions to the bid documents, are available by going to www.ciplist.com and signing up, by going to Member Login or Member Signup (it's free), then choose California, then scroll down to San Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities, then scroll down to Rancho Cucamonga and click on City Projects, then click on the Project of interest under the Title and follow directions for download. Note, copies of the plans, specifications, bid proposal, addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from the above website then printed. Prospective bidders must register for an Resolution No. - Page 3 of 4 P83 account on www.ciplist.com to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s) and to receive email updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained on this site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to the bid documents, it is the responsibility of each prospective bidder to register with www.ciplist.com and to check this website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to registered prospective bidders from www.ciplist.com. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "THE CENTRAL PARK PAVILION PROJECT " may be directed to: KAREN MCGUIRE-EMERY 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2760, ext. 2205 ADVERTISE ON: May 7 and 15, 2013 Resolution No. - Page 4 of 4 P84 STAFF REPORT - COMMUNITY SFRVICEs DFPARTMENT RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director By: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND HELD IN LIEU OF A MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, IN THE AMOUNT OF $36,826.00, FOR THE VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER CELEBRATION HALL FLOORING PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 11-074 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond held in lieu of a Maintenance Guarantee Bond, in the amount of $36,826.00, for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Celebration Hall Flooring Project, Contract No. 11-074. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: HUR Flooring 15204 Stagg St Van Nuys, CA 91405 Respectfully submitted, Nettie Nielsen Community Services Director P85 STAFF REPORT J RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT RANCHO DATE: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA TO: Mayor and Members of the City Coun it John Gillison, AICP, City Manager FROM: Mike Newcombe, Police Chief BY: Mark Plamondon, Lieutenant Steve Wolff, Detective SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE UPGRADED COMPUTER FORENSICS ANALYSIS WORKSTATION FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM FORENSIC COMPUTERS INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,766.52 AS A SOLE SOURCE VENDOR AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $37,766.52 STATE ASSET SEIZURE FUNDS INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 1195701-5605 (CAPITAL OUTLAY-COMPUTER EQUIPMENT) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve the purchase of an upgraded computer forensics analysis workstation for the Police Department in the amount of $37,766.52 from Forensic Computers Inc. as a sole source vendor and authorize the appropriation of $37,766.52 from State Assets Seizure Funds into account number 1195701-5605 (Capital Outlay-Computer Equipment). BACKGROUND Beginning in late 2002, the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department began acquiring the equipment necessary to perform forensic examinations on computer equipment seized as part of a criminal investigation. Prior to this date, the Police Department relied on the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department's High-Tech Division to perform these services. As digital evidence became more abundant in criminal investigations we experienced extended delays in the amount of time it took for the High-Tech Division to complete work requests for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In an effort to maintain the highest level of service for the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, the Police Department began investing in the equipment and training required to provide this service in-house. During the past decade, we have continued to build on this foundation by adding new equipment and technology that has improved our ability to examine a wide variety of digital evidence seized on a daily basis. We have been fortunate over the years to take advantage of several state and federal programs that have enabled us to obtain specialized computer equipment at no cost to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This purchase replaces our oldest forensic computer with a state of the art machine that should support this service for the next five years. SOLE SOURCE VENDOR — FORENSIC COMPUTERS INC. In order to complete a forensically sound examination of digital evidence seized from computer devices special equipment must be used. The examination must be done in such a way so that the P86 AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE UPGRADED COMPUTER FORENSICS ANALYSIS PAGE 2 WORKSTATION FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM FORENSIC COMPUTERS INC. IWITIE,, ANIOUNT OF$37,766.52 AS A SOLE.SOURCE VENDOR AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $37,766.52 STATE ASSET SEIZURE FUNDS INT MAY 1,2013 source evidence is not altered in any way. A standard computer is not suitable for this purpose as its hardware alters key portions of the file system as part of its interaction with the operating system. In 2006, we participated in a Technology Transfer Program offered by the federal government. This program provided all of the equipment and necessary training for specialized investigative disciplines. It was at that time that we were introduced to Forensic Computers Incorporated as the vendor who was supplying the computer equipment for this program. We received their Forensic Tower II System at no cost to the city and that system is still in service today. This vendor has continued to develop a variety of computers specifically designed to meet and exceed the forensic standards. Because of the specialized components and their design process they qualify as a Sole Source Vendor. These exclusive system components are essential in the overall function of the forensic tech lab. The new equipment provided by Forensic Computers will not only interface with our existing Forensic Tower System but will supplement its overall performance. System hardware and software details are attached. TOTAL COST FOR SYSTEM The total cost for this system is $37,766.52, including shipping. The only recurring costs associated with this purchase would be for the ongoing support of the purchased software in the amount of $1,000.00 per year beginning in FY 2014/15. These recurring costs would be covered annually out of the Police Department's budget. Attachments: Quotation-02113-43 from Forensic Computers Inc. Sole Source Letter from Forensic Computers Inc. P87 ` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION RANCHO FOR PURCHASES $5,000 AND ABOVE CUCAMONGA The below information is provided in support of my Department requesting approval for a single/sole source. Outside of a duly declared emergency, the time to develop a statement of work or specifications is not in itself justification for single or sole source. Vendor:_Forensic Computers Inc. Date: _April 10, 2013 Com mod ity/Service:_Computer Forensics Analyst System Estimated expenditure: _$35,000.00 Your Name: _Steve Wolff Extent of market search conducted: Internet Search for similar products Price Reasonableness:_Price is within range of similar products doing similar things_ Does moving forward on this product/service further obligate the City to future similar contract actual arrangements? NO DEFINITIONS: SINGLE SOURCE — a transaction with a business entity that is chosen, without competition, from among two or more business entities capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that meet the specified need. SOLE SOURCE - A transaction with the only business entity capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that meet the specified need. Initial all entries below that apply to the proposed purchase (more than one entry will apply to most single/sole source products/services requested). If needed, attach a memorandum containing complete justification and support documentation as directed in initial entry. THIS IS A SINGLE SOURCE ❑ THIS IS A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE (check one). 1 .�_ SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS FOR THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER, THERE ARE NO REGIONAL DISTRIBUTORS. (item no. 3 also must also be completed) 2. THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE WITH SIMILAR PARTS OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER. (Explain in separate memorandum) P88 Single/Sole Source Justification Form Page 2 3. X THIS IS THE ONLY KNOWN ITEM OR SERVICE THAT WILL MEET THE SPECIALIZED NEEDS OF THIS DEPARTMENT OR PERFORM THE INTENDED FUNCTION. (Attach memorandum with details of specialized function or application). 4. UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE SUPPLY/SERVICE BEING REQUESTED. THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE SUPPLIER. (Attach memorandum with reasons why these unique features are and what benefit the City will accrue.) 5. THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE REQUIRED FROM THIS SOURCE TO PERMIT STANDARDIZATION. (Attach memorandum describing basis for standardization request). 6. NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY. A DETAILED EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS CONTAINED IN A ATTACHED MEMORANDUM The undersigned requests that competitive procurement be waived and that the vendor identified as the supplier of the service or material described in this single/sole source justification be authorized as a single/sole source for the service or material. Department Head: Department: Police • . • • • • • • • • Purchasing Department • • • • • • • • • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITION/S El DISAPPROVE Comments: $5,000 - $50,000 APPROVED BY PURCHASING MANAGER: Date: $50,000— 100,000 APPROVED BY CITY MANAGER: Date: $100,000 AND OVER See comments above by Purchasing Division, attach to Council Request CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Date: P89 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REQUEST FOR QUOTE# O z tt''' 43 ;RNr,l FOR CAM DUE DATE: ON OR BEFORE , BY PM Quot®Oorltact . To Name: ATTN: Steve woes Phone No.: Address: 1D510 Civic Center Drive Fax Quote To: Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Email Quote To: Phone: 909.477-2957 INSTRUCTIONS: Completion of this quote form is a requirement Failure to do so may disqualify your submi tal. • Vendors must submit sr°ned quotes by the due date and time as specified above. • Vendors will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted as requested. • The CITY reserves the right, unless otherwise stated, to accept or reject all or any quote, any part thereof, either separately or as a whole, to waive any informality in a quote and to split or make the award in any manner determined to be in the best Interest of the CITY. • The City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that price is only one of several criteria to be used in judging a product or service, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is not legally bound to accept the lowest quote. • Please do not Include Sales Tax during your calculations below. Sales Tax is not factored in during the evaluation for award of a quote and is calculated at the appropriate time by the CITY. LINE CITY UOM DESCRIPTION PART" UNIT PRICE EXTENDED LEAD TIME i ITEM 1 1 EA Forensic Analysis Workstation FAW-1 13,499.00 13,499.00 10 - 15 (Dual Eight-Core Xeon) Business Days 2 1 EA Ultimate Forensic Write UFWPK-BA 1,971.00 1,971.00 10- 15 Protection Build-A-Kit K Business Days 3 1 EA Tableau TACC1441 Hardware TACC14411 3,820.00 3,820.00 10 - 15 Accelerator (Internal) Business Days 1 EA AccessData Forensic Toollrit 4- AD-FTK4 2,995.00 2,995.00 10 - 15 4 Includes RV,Imager,PRTK,and DNA50 Business Days 5 1 EA AccessData Forensic Toolkit 4 SMS AD-FTK4-S 840.00 840.00 10- 15 (Subscription Maintenance Service) MS Business Days e 1 1 EA AccessData Visualization AD-VIS 1,279.00 1,279.00 10 - 15 Module with 1 Year SMS I I Business Days SUBTOTAL Continued on Page 2 SHIPPING/FREIGHT(F.O.S.DESTINATION) GRAND TOTAL Continued on Page 2 Company Name: Address: Forensic Computers, Inc. (street,Su.#Cry,State.Zip) Telephone#: 110 Forensic Lane 540-726.9530 Fax#: Glen Lyn, VA 24093 540-72e-9533 E-mail address: Web Address: greg @forensiccomputers.com www.forensiccomputers.00m Authorized Representative:(print) Title: Greg Dominguez Chief Operations Officer Sig Date: 4/9/2013 P90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REQUEST FOR QUOTE# 07-kk3 q5 FOR Ito lPt=NCK DUE DATE: ON OR BEFORE BY PM -'6h[ P.D.B.To: Name: ATTN: Steve Wolff Phone No.: Address: 10510 Civic Center Drive Fax Quote To: Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Email Quote To: Phone: 909-477-2857 INSTRUCTIONS: Completion of this quote form Is a requirement Failure to do so may disqualify your submittal. • Vendors must submit sloned quotes by the due date and time as specified above. • Vendors will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted as requested. • The CITY reserves the right, unless otherwise stated, to accept or reject all or any quote, any part thereof, either separately or as a whole, to waive any informality in a quote and to split or make the award in any manner determined to be in the best Interest of the CITY. • The City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that price is only one of several criteria to be used in judging a product or service,and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is not legally bound to accept the lowest quote. • Please do not include Sales Tax during your calculations below. Sales Tax is not factored in during the evaluation for award of a quote and is calculated at the appropriate time by the CITY. LINE OTY LIONI DESCRIPTION P A R T.'.' UNI r PRICE EXTENDED LEAD TIME ITEM 1 1 EA X1 Social Discovery X1 SD 945.00 945.00 10 - 15 Business Days 2 1 EA AccessData 10 TB Hard AD-RT-HD 2,500.00 2,500.00 10 - 15 Drive for Rainbow Tables Business Days 3 1 EA AccessData Rainbow Tables AD-RT 6,995.00 6,995.00 10 - 15 Business Days 4 5 6 SUBTOTAL 134,844.00 SHIPPING/FREIGHT(F.O.B.DESTINATION) 1135.00 GRAND TOTAL 134,979.00 Company Name: Address, Forensic Computers, Inc. (Street,Su.0 City.State,Zip) Telephone#; 110 Forensic Lane 54D-726-9530 Glen Lyn, VA 24093 Fa)i M 540-726-9533 E-mail address: Web Address: greg@forensk=rnputers.00m www.forensiecomputers.com Authorized Representative: (print) Title: Greg Dominguez Chlef Operations Officer Sign re Date: 4/9/2013 P91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PURCHASING DIVISION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Pre-Qualification —Vendors wishing to submit a Quote, Bid or Proposal response must be registered as a Vendor with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Only those responses received from registered Vendors will be accepted. Responses must be submitted by the same Vendor that has downloaded the Request for Quote, Bid or Proposal from the Bid system. This information is indicated in the system and provides the ability to tabulate the responses in accordance to the named Vendors. Submitting a response under a Vendor name that does not appear to be on the Notified or Prospective Bidders list will be deemed as non-responsive and dis-qualified from the process. PLEASE NOTE: Failure to register for this solicitation may disqualify your submittal. 2. All prices and notations must be typewritten or written in ink. No erasures permitted. Mistakes may be crossed out and corrections made adjacent, and must be initialed in ink by person signing the submittal. 3. Propose each item separately. Prices should be stated in units specified herein and without CA sales tax, unless otherwise advised. 4. Use the documents provided. If you decide to submit more than one submittal, photocopy our documents. Informal Quotes may be submitted electronically via the City's Bid System, or as instructed in the Request for Quote package. Formal Bids and Proposals must be submitted under separate cover from the Bid or Proposal response, in a SEALED envelope, clearly marked with the solicitation number and title on the outer most packaging, and must be received by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Purchasing Department, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, not later than the hour and day specified in the Request for Bid or Request for Proposal package. 5. Time of delivery is part of the consideration and must be'stated in definite terms; and must be adhered to. If time varies on different items, the Vendor shall so state for each item. 6. Payment Terms of less than thirty (30) days for cash discount will be considered as net. Cash discount period will be computed either from the date of delivery and acceptance of the goods ordered or the date of receipt of correct and proper invoices, prepared in accordance with the terms of our purchase order, whichever date is later. 7. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's standard freight terms are FOB: Destination. 8. A responsible officer or employee must sign with the Vendor's name on all submittals. Obligations assumed by such signature must be fulfilled. 9. No charge for transportation, packing, drayage, or for any other purpose will be allowed over and above the prices proposed on this sheet. 10. In case of default by the Vendor, the City of Rancho Cucamonga may procure the articles or service from other sources and may deduct from unpaid balance due to the Vendor, or may bill for excess costs so paid, and the prices paid by the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be considered the prevailing market prices paid at the time such purchase is made. 11. Cost of transportation, handling, and/or inspection on deliveries, or Vendors for delivery, which do not meet specifications, will be for the account of the Vendor. 12. The Vendor shall hold the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, agents, servants and employees, harmless from liability of any nature or kind on account of use of any copyright, or uncopyrighted composition, secret process, patented or unpatented invention, article or appliance furnished or used under this solicitation. 13. The Vendor will not be held liable for failure or delay in fulfillment if hindered or prevented by fire, strikes, or Acts of God. Vendor shall be excused from performance hereunder during the time and to the extent that he/she is prevented from obtaining, delivery on, or performing in the customary manner, by acts of God, fire, war, strike, loss or shortage of transportation facilities, lockout or commandeering of raw materials, product plants or facilities by the government. Vendor shall provide the City satisfactory evidence that nonperformance is due to other than fault of negligence on Vendors part. 14. Any evidence of agreement or collusion among Vendors and prospective Vendors acting to illegally restrain freedom of competition by agreement to propose a fixed price, or otherwise, will render the submittal of such Vendors void. 15. Advance disclosures of any information to any particular Vendor which gives that particular Vendor any advantage over any other interested Vendor, in advance of the opening submittals, whether in response to City of Rancho Cucamonga Pg. 2 of 7 Request for Quote(RFQ) Last Edit 511212011 P92 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PURCHASING DIVISION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS advertising or an informal request, made or permitted by a member of the City Council or an employee or representative thereof, will operate to void all submittals of that particular solicitation or request. 16. It is agreed that the successful Vendor will not assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of the Agreement or its right, title or interest in or to the same, or any part thereof, without previous written consent of the Purchasing Manager. 17. Vendors may be considered non-responsive and disqualified resulting in the rejection of submittal for any of, but not limited to, the following causes: — Failure to use the forms furnished by the City. — Failure to be registered as a Vendor. — Failure to submit response under registered Vendor name. — Lack of signature by an authorized representative on the submittal form. — Failure to properly complete the submittal. — Evidence of collusion among Vendors. — Unauthorized alteration of submittal form. — Not received by specified due date. 18. Submittals are subject to acceptance at any time within ninety (90) days after opening, unless otherwise stipulated. 19. Verify your submittal before submission, as they cannot be withdrawn or corrected after being opened. In the event of a calculation error, the unit price shall prevail. 20. The City of Rancho Cucamonga pays California Sales Tax regardless of Vendor's place of doing business and is exempt from Federal Excise Tax. Unless otherwise specified, DO NOT include sales tax in your response. 21. Accounts paying for transportation of property to the City of Rancho Cucamonga are exempt from Federal Transportation Tax. An Exemption Certificate is not required where the shipping papers show the consignee as City of Rancho Cucamonga; as such papers may be accepted by the carrier as proof of the exempt character of the shipment. 22. The articles covered by the response must conform to safety orders of, but not limited to, OSHA, CALOSHA, NFPA and/or NIOSH. 23. Conflict of Interest: Your signature herein certifies that no City employee, whose position in City service enables them to influence any award of your offer or any competing offer, shall have any direct or indirect financial interest in any transaction resulting from this solicitation. 24. Vendors making delivery or providing services on City premises shall carry Liability Insurance and Worker's Compensation coverage in accordance with the City's Standard Practice. 25. Municipal Ordinances may require the issuance of a City of Rancho Cucamonga Business License as a condition precedent to being engaged as a contract Vendor by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 26. The City hereby agrees to make payment to Vendor's cost for all government mandated equipment requirements enacted after the award, which affect the Vendor's ability to supply the specified equipment. 27. A written Purchase Order mailed, or otherwise furnished to the successful Vendor within the time for acceptance specified, shall result in a binding Agreement without further action on either part. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and given effect in all respects according to the laws of the State of California. 28. QUANTITY ADJUSTMENT: When applicable, it is mutually accepted that the quantities defined in this document reflect the approximate City requirements and may be either decreased or increased and honored at stated prices as proposed. 29. WARRANTIES: Vendor will fully warrant all materials and equipment for a period of not less than one (1) year from date of final acceptance by the City unless otherwise noted. All warranties, standard and extended, shall be shown on any units offered, and all costs related to the servicing of said warranties shall be clearly stated on submittal form. 30. LAWS GOVERNING AGREEMENT: The Agreement shall be in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and the County of San Bernardino is the only appropriate forum for any litigation. In the event a suit or City of Rancho Cucamonga Pg. 3 of 7 Request for Quote(RFQ) Last Edit 511212011 P93 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PURCHASING DIVISION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS action is instituted arising out of any Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive, in addition to its cost, such sum as the Court may adjudge reasonable as to attorney's fees and costs. 31. AWARD: The City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that price is only one of several criteria to be used in judging a product or service, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is not legally bound to accept the lowest response. Agreements shall be awarded to the Vendor whose offer is determined to be the most advantageous to the City from the standpoint of suitability to purpose, quality, service, previous experience, price, ability to deliver, or for any other reason deemed by the Purchasing Manager to be in the best interest of the City and, as such, will not be determined by price alone and may not be the lowest response especially where services are of utmost importance. When there is more than one (1) item, the City reserves the right to award separately or as a whole. Vendors must state "all or none" on submittal form. If optional items or trade-ins are requested, the City may accept or decline such items. 32. CANCELLATION: The City reserves the right to cancel the Agreement, or any part of, due to failure by the Vendor to carry out any material obligation, term or condition of the Agreement. The City shall issue written notice to the Vendor for acting or failing to act. 33. OWNERSHIP OF WORK PRODUCT and Transfer of All Intellectual Property Rights Upon creation, all work product, including but not limited to, original writings, documents, work of visual art, work of authorship, images, photographs, audio and video recordings, fine art, designs, concepts, ideas, and any and all other work products produced pursuant to this Agreement, including all intellectual property rights arising therefrom, whether they are sub-components of a larger product, or are themselves the finished product (collectively, "Work Product"), shall each be considered a "Work Made for Hire", as that term is used in Title 17, U.S.C. §101, and upon City's payment to Vendor for the same, each will forever become property of the City. For purposes of this provision, Work Product includes, but is not limited to, graphic designs, treatments, and layouts; logo artwork; photographs; copy/text used in advertisements, newsletters, etc.; audio and video recordings; Internet web pages and e-mail communication products; signage; and any other creative work done in part, or in whole, for the City pursuant to this Agreement, including any and all copies, drafts, models, depictions, drawings, duplicates and preliminary versions of any of the Vendor's Work Product. Upon payment by City for any delivered Work Product, such delivery shall be deemed to constitute a transfer to the City of all intellectual property rights of any nature whatsoever, and rights of reproduction as that term is defined in California Civil Code § 982, in the Work Product, including but not limited to the right to claim statutory copyright in Vendor's Work Product and the right to reproduce Vendor's Work Product in any manner whatsoever, for commercial and non-commercial purposes. To the extent all rights and interest in all Work Product are not otherwise effectively transferred by this provision, then upon payment by City for any delivered Work Product, all of the same rights and interests will be deemed assigned in their entirety to the City, and the Vendor shall thereafter retain absolutely no right or interest of any nature in any of the Work Product. If Vendor's Work Product consists in whole or in part of"fine art", as defined in California Civil Code § 982, then upon payment by City for such delivered Work Product, the Vendor shall be deemed to have waived, released and disclaimed any and all of Vendor's rights, demands or claims with respect to the City, as may arise at any time and under any circumstances, under the Federal Visual Artists Rights Act (17 U.S.C. §§ 106A and 113(d)), California Civil Code § 986, the California Art Preservation Act (California Civil Code § 987, et seq.), and/or any other local, state, federal or international laws that convey rights of the same nature as those conveyed under any of the foregoing statutes, or that convey any other type of moral right protecting the integrity of works of art and/or intellectual property rights arising from their creation. The Vendor acknowledges and agrees that City, in its sole and exclusive discretion, may, among other acts,temporarily or permanently modify, alter, change or destroy any of Vendor's Work Product. Prior to any proposed destruction of Vendor's Work Product consisting of fine art, a reasonable attempt shall be made to provide the Vendor with an opportunity to reclaim possession of Vendor's fine art. City of Rancho Cucamonga Pg. 4 of 7 Request for Quote(RFQ) Last Edit 5/12/2011 P94 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PURCHASING DIVISION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS 34. Insurance Qualifications (Minimum): The Vendor may be required to provide proof of insurance coverage. Company submitting qualifications must be able to provide a copy or copies of Company's Certificates of Insurance or a letter from the insurance carrier(s) evidencing the fact that the Company is able to be insured pertaining to services rendered for the following minimums, as required by the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Vendor shall neither commence work until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to City, nor shall Vendor allow any sub-contractor to commence work on a sub-contract until all insurance required of the sub-contractor has been obtained. Vendor shall take out and maintain, at all times during the term of the project, the following policies of insurance: (1) Worker's Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, Vendor shall furnish to City a Certificate of Insurance as proof that it has taken out full Worker's Compensation insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through sub-contractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his/her employees. Vendor shall, prior to commencing work, sign and file with City a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700 which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of this Agreement." (2) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at Vendor's sole cost and expense, Vendor shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of the City and Vendor, Comprehensive, Broad Form, General Public Liability and Automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from Vendor's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage. If such insurance includes an aggregate limit, such aggregate shall be no less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000). All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 7(a) and (b) shall name as additional insured's City, its elected officials, officers, employees and designated agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that: (I) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against City and City's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by City; and (3) they may not be canceled except after thirty (30) days notice by insurer to City by first class mail. Vendor shall furnish City with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing insurance. Vendor may elect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. * Proof of current insurance certificate(s) will be required prior to issuing a purchase order. 35. Conflict of Interest: Your signature herein certifies that no City employee, whose position on the City service enables them to influence any award of your offer or any competing offer, shall have any direct or indirect financial interest in any transaction resulting from this solicitation. 36. Vendors making delivery or providing service on City premises shall carry liability insurance and Worker's Compensation coverage in accordance with the City's Standard Practice. 37. Indemnity: a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Vendor shall indemnify, defend and hold free and harmless City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers from and against all tort liability, including liability for claims, suits, actions, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorney's fees City of Rancho Cucamonga Pg. 5 of 7 Request for Quote(RFQ) Last Edit 511212011 P95 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PURCHASING DIVISION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS incurred by City, court costs, interest and defense costs including expert witness fees, where the same arise out of, or are connected with, in whole or in part, the acts or omissions of Vendor or any of Vendor's officers, agents, employees or contractors in the performance of this Agreement, and which result in bodily injury, death or property damage, or financial loss to any individual or entity, including the employees or officials of Vendor. Vendor warrants that it possesses all rights to provide all of the Work Product required to be provided pursuant to this Agreement. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Vendor shall indemnify, defend and hold free and harmless City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers from and against all liabilities, claims, suits, actions, and expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorney's fees incurred by City, court costs, interest and defense costs including expert witness fees, where the same arise out of, or are connected with, in whole or in part, a claim that all or any part of any Work Product provided to the City pursuant to this Agreement infringes upon any proprietary or commercial interest, or intellectual property right, including copyright, of any third party. b. Vendor's obligations under this or any other provision of this Agreement will not be limited by the provisions of any Worker's Compensation act or similar act. Vendor expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to the City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers. C. City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may possess against Vendor because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. This hold harmless and indemnification provision shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense. Vendor agrees that Vendor's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. d. Vendor agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Vendor under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Vendor agrees that City may withhold any percentage of the Agreement amount payable hereunder as required by any taxing agency having jurisdiction over the City, and pay the same to such taxing agency as it may require. Vendor agrees that it shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, liabilities, and interest asserted against City by reason of Vendor's failure to pay any taxes, or as a result of City's reliance on inaccurate, incorrect, false or misleading information provided to City by Vendor relating to any tax laws, regulations or requirements applicable to taxes owed by Vendor in connection with this Agreement. e. Vendor further agrees that it shall indemnify and hold City harmless with respect to any and all claims, penalties and liabilities arising directly or indirectly from the independent Vendor relationship created by this Agreement. Vendor shall fully comply with the Workers' Compensation laws regarding Vendor and Vendor's employees. Vendor further agrees to indemnity and hold City harmless from any failure of Vendor to comply with applicable Worker's Compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Vendor under this Agreement any amount due to City from Vendor as a result of Vendor's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section. 38. Environmental Sustainability: Vendor will make every reasonable effort to use environmentally preferable products, methods, equipment, packaging and transportation in relation to this transaction. Further, Vendor shall ensure disposal of any removed materials is conducted in an environmentally responsible manner. Products purchased under this Agreement must meet, but not limited to, the following standards: "Energy Star" (www.ener rvg star.gov , "EPEAT" (www.eyeat.net), and provide proof of meeting the "EcoLogo and/or Green Seal" standard and certification requirements (www.ecologo.org and/or www.ereenseal.org). 39. Method of Payment: Vendor shall submit to City an invoice, on a monthly basis or less frequently, for the services performed pursuant to this Agreement. Each invoice shall itemize the services rendered during the billing period and the amount due. Within ten (10) business days of receipt of each invoice, City shall notify Vendor in writing of any disputed amounts included on the invoice. Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of each invoice, City shall pay all undisputed amounts included on the invoice. Unless otherwise required by any taxing authority having jurisdiction over the City (see Section 9 D.), City shall not withhold applicable taxes or other authorized deductions from payments made to Vendor. At any time during regular working hours, all records, City of Rancho Cucamonga Pg. 6 of 7 Request for Quote(RFQ) Last Edit 511212011 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PURCHASING DIVISION P96 STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS i invoices, and other materials accounting for the services shall be available for review and audit by City. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, City shall be entitled to retain not less than twenty-five percent (25%) of any amount due monthly to Vendor,pending Vendor's completion of any unfinished work and/or delivery of any outstanding receivables to City, in full compliance with this Agreement. [--*The undersigned Vendor declares that the above terms and conditions have been carefully read and examined. Vendor agrees that if this quote Is accepted vendor will furnish all material In accordance with the specifications and Instructions in the time and manner therein described for the unit cost as submitted in this Request for Quote. THE VENDOR IN SUBMITTING THIS QUOTE MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY VOID YOUR QUOTE. Authorized Representative: (print) Company Name: Greg Dominguez Forensic Computers,Inc. Signature, Title: Chief Operations Officer E-mail add Date: greg @forensiccomputers.com 4/9/2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pg. 7 of 7 Request for Quote(RFQ) Lest Edit 8x1212011 P97 VVFORENSIC COMPUTERS March 7, 2013 Steve Wolff Rancho Cucamonga Police Department 10510 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Ref: Sole Source Letter Forensic Computers, Inc. is the sole manufacturer of the"Forensic Analysis Workstation or FAW-I" series of forensic workstations. The forensic computer workstations we engineer, build and test are the same equipment used in our own computer forensics practice. Our Chief Operations Officer is a retired Special Agent with over 20 years experience in Computer Forensics. These systems are unique from commercial products like Dell and HP because of the forensic specific equipment that is installed. For example, the FT II has a Forensic Drive bay Controller installed which allows the forensic examiner to properly seize and image computer hard disk drives without altering the potential evidence. The act of collecting computer evidence and performing forensic analysis of that evidence place demands on the computer system that normal administrative use does not. The internal components we use are the best available which increases the systems trouble free life span. We have developed a testing methodology that exceeds these demands and insures data integrity. No company currently selling computers to the mass business or home market has the forensic expertise to insure their systems will not alter evidence. The Forensic Computers product line is backed with a solid one year warranty, which is extendable for up to three years. Our warranty is hassle free and we take meaningful steps to ensure you're satisfied with your investment across the board with hardware, software and training. We have a history of providing no cost and/or no-profit upgrades if we find a way to enhance the performance or function of our forensic workstations. Forensic Computers is a combat veteran owned and operated company. Please contact me if you have additional question. Sincerely, .frcy,�nntu�ytuz Greg Dominguez Chief Operations Officer 110 Forensic Lane Glen Lyn, VA 24093 USA Phone: 540-726-9530 Fax: 540-726-9533 Toll Free: 877-877-4224 TIN: 20-8134629 P98 STAFF REPORT P-kNCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Ma pager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chi By: Breanna Medina, Management Analyst II/Emergency Management Program Subject: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,000 AWARDED BY THE CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FY2010 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT-AMENDED), AND ADMINISTERED BY THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT INTO ACCOUNT 1380000-4740 (GRANT INCOME); AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $45,000 INTO ACCOUNT 1380501-5207 FOR THE PURCHASE OF A REGIONAL (WEST END JPA) AMATEUR RADIO REDUNDANT DIGITAL DATA EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT RECOMMENDATION Approve the acceptance of grant revenue in the amount of $45,000 awarded by the California Emergency Management Agency (FY2010 Homeland Security Grant-Amended), and administered by the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Office of Emergency Services to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District into Account 1380000-4740 (Grant Income) and authorize the appropriation into Account 1380501-5207 (O&M Capital Supplies) in the amount of $45,000 for the purchase of a regional (West End JPA) Amateur Radio Redundant Digital Data Emergency Communications Project. BACKGROUND This project will expand the current redundant high speed Amateur radio digital data and digital voice systems that have been completed in the cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Upland. The system provides a 128Kbs redundant transparent network connection (Amateur radio based), which allows messages, reports, photos and video clips to be sent between the field, the EOC and the region in the event of a network server outage due to a catastrophic event. This allows digital internet/voice connectivity when all normal channels fail. These digital voice channels are narrowband, doubling the number of connections that can be established and also include embedded low speed data that can be used for short text messages or position reporting. The system has been successfully executed and tested between the cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Upland and continues to provide a direct non-city networked connection. Expanding the digital data and digital voice system to the West End Region (Chaffey College, Chino, Chino Hills, Montclair and Ontario Emergency Management Programs) and the San Bernardino County Fire Department/Office of Emergency Services EOC in Rialto will enable the rapid redundant flow of information between the West End cities and the County (ECS Amateur P99 APPROVAL TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF$45,000 AWARDED BY PAGE? THE CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY(FY2010 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT-AMENDED),AND ADMINISTERED BY THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT,OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES TO THE RAN IvL1v 1,2013 Radio group) in the event of a catastrophic communications failure. Additionally, adding the requested digital data and digital voice repeaters in the Chino/Ontario area will fill in coverage to the Upland EOC (a hill blocks the coverage from Banyan Station 175) and provide backup coverage for most of the West End area. The following list details requested equipment for each city to complete the project (Location at the discretion of the host city). City Repeater Laptops ID-1 Base ID-1 Field 2820 Base Chaffey College 2 1 1 1 Chino 2 1 1 1 Chino Hills 2 1 1 1 Montclair 2 1 1 1 Ontario 1' 2 1 1 1 San Bernardino County Office 2 1 1 1 of Emergency Services ECS Pi 00 STAFF REPORT - ENGINFE'RING SERv10ES DEI)ARTMENP Date: May 1, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD THE BASE BID AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $477,756.00, TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, LAIRD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $47,775.60, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION — OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS PROJECT TO BE FUNDED FROM GAS TAX RT7360 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 1174303-5650/1022174-0 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $192,000.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1174303-5650/1022174-0 FROM GAS TAX RT7360 FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council Accept the bids received and award the base bid and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $477,756.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, Laird Construction Company Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $47,775.60, for the Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation — Overlay of Various Streets project to be funded from Gas Tax RT7360 Funds, Account No. 1174303-5650/1022174-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $192,000.00 to Account No. 1174303-5650/1022174-0 from Gas Tax RT7360 Fund balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 26, 2013, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate for the base bid was $546,890.50. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found all but one to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. The bid proposal from All American Asphalt was found to be non-responsive to the City's needs because they did not include the addendum issued for the project. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of work consists of cold milling, crack seal, adjusting existing manholes and valves to new grade, pavement overlay and striping. It is estimated that approximately seven jobs will be either generated or sustained in connection with this project. The contract documents call for sixty (60)working days to complete this construction. Respectfully submitted, �; Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/RMD/SH:ls Attachments nAQ MAP-4 MAP-3 MAP-2 D ST v Li > >¢ w ¢ HIDDEN FARM > a NIC<SID f C I i z HgNNeC w > VISTA GROVE w ¢ E RD. x w ¢ s HILLSIDE RD. U } ¢ � I J � } %,.., WILSON AVE z � w > BANYAN ST, BANYAN ST. _ - - z Li ¢ J MAP-5 N AVE. ¢ w i LEMON AVE x x z ¢ w z J ¢ ND AVE. wz HIGHLAND u ar`'� HIGHLAND AVE. - th ST. S VICTORIA 19th ST. A 3 w Li y VICTORI a a MONTE VISTA ST. MONTE VISTA ST. 0 MAP- 7 7 < W J N 6 t W I z } z 2 w w ❑ x u U m J ¢ BASELINE AVE BASE LIN w ¢ PKWY a a �,SSP w Q 6�RP w w CHURCH ST. ¢ Y > J J MAP-9 < C z w a LL SAN BERNARDINO RD x 1 0 w �J FOOTHILL w " FOOTHILL BLVD. d w > > 6 6 ¢ D ON ¢ . o > < W LIVIC ¢ >- > CENTER DR zz, > /ARROW RTE i ARROW ROUTE > ¢ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10 FY 2012/2013 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABHITATION OVERLAY N.T.S. P102 BID SUMMARY FORBID OPENING MARCH 26,2013 APPARENT LOW BIDDER 2 3 FY 2012/2013 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REIIAB- OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS ENGINEER'S M"IMTE AR American Axhaft Laird Construction Co.Inc. Hardy Hacper,me. Itua Ola M. z,],4,5,9 aM t t unit AMOUflT coBT wMOOxT COST C M OU TNO VmT COST AMOUNT xo Tr Uxrt DAscm"ll cost 0.10'ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY INCLUDING PAVEMENT PREPARATION, 75,00 E 416,925.00 $64.00 $355,776.00 $65.00 $361,335.00 $65.56 $364,448,04 PATCHING,ROUTING AND CRACK 1 5559 TONS FILLING 0.10'SKIN PATCH INCLUDING SAW CUT AND 0.10 COLD PLANE PER PLAN 0.95 53.961.50 $1.50 $6,255.00 $175 $7,297.50 $1.50 $6,255.00 AND DETAIL(SEE TYP.DETAIL IN 2 4170 SF SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX 3 29165 SY COLD PLANE 1.60 $46,66400 $1.301 $37,914.50 $1.001 $29,165.00 $1.231 $35,872.95 ADJUST'MANHOLE(STORM DRAIN, 300.00 S11,700.00 $315.001 $12,285.00 $290.001 $11,310.00 $300.001 $11,700.00 d 39 EA SEWER,ETC.)TO GRADE ADJUST WATER/GAS VALVES TO 180.00 513,140.00 $80.001 $5,840.00 $50.001 $3,650.00 $10.001 $730.00 5 73 EA GRADE ADJUST WATER METER AND 250.00 $4,500.00 $260.001 $4,680.00 $340.001 $6,120.00 $350.001 $6,300.00 6 18 EA CLEANOUTS TO GRADE TRAFFIC STRIPING,MARKINGS AND MARKERS PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 133(ALL LEGENDS, 25,000.00 $25,000.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $4,228.50 $4,228.50 $12,694.01 $12,694.01 SYMBOLS,LIMIT LINES AND CROSSWALKS SHALL BE 7 1 LS THERMOPLASTICS( B 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL 25,00000 $25,000.00 $46,749.501 $46,749.50 $54,650.001 $54,650.00 $58,000.001 $58,00000 TOTAL BASE HID "".390.50 HT5,00o.00 "77,756.00 "96.000.00 DAM U. BID U.IT DID NO T7 DIRT Da Ma t BSCRIT10N C09T I AMOUNT COST AMOVIR COST AMOVIR VNR COST AMOUNT 0.BY ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY INCLUDING PAVEMENT PREPARATION, 75.00 $ 28,125.00 $64.00 $24,000.00 $66.00 $24,750.00 $65.56 $24,585.00 PATCHING,ROUTING AND CRACK 1 375 TONS FILLING OAV SKIN PATCH INCLUDING SAW CUT AND 0.10'COLD PLANE PER PLAN 0.95 SI 44400 $1,50 $2,280.00 $2.25 $3,420.00 $1.50 $2,280.00 AND DETAIL(SEE.TYP.DETAIL IN 2 1520 SR SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX 3 1932 SY COLD PLANE 1.60 53,091.20 $1.301 $2,511.60 $1.001 $1,932.00 $1.231 $2376.36 ADJUST MANHOLE(STORM DRAIN, 300.00 $300.00 $315.001 $315.00 $290.001 $290.00 $300.001 $300.00 41 1 EA SEWER,ETC.(TO GRADE ADJUST WATER METER AND 250.00 $1,250.00 $80.001 $400.00 $50.001 $250.00 $350.001 $1,750.00 5 5 EA CLEANOUTS TO GRADE TRAFFIC STRIPING,MARKINGS AND MARKERS PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 133(ALL LEGENDS, 15.000.00 $15,000.00 $300.00 $300.00 $250.00 $250.00 $3,708.64 $3,708.64 SYMBOLS,LIMIT LINES AND CROSSWALKS SHALL BE 6 1 Lj THERMOPLASTICS( 7 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL 15,00000 $15,000.00 $2,193.401 $2,193.40 $5,650.001 $5,650.00 $5,000.001 $5,000.00 TOTAL ADDITIVE MAP I "4,210.10 $02.000.00 "36,542.00 "0,000.00 NO TY UNIT DBBCRIMIOxMa 6 COBT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT CONT AMOUNT UNIT COST AMOONT 0.10'ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY INCLUDING PAVEMENT PREPARATION, 75.00 S 94,500.00 $64.00 $80,640.00 $66.00 $83,160.00 $65.56 $82,605.60 PATCHING,ROUTING AND CRACK 1 1260 TONS FILLING 0.10'SKIN PATCH INCLUDING SAW CUT AND 0.10'COLD PLANE PER PLAN 0.95 5395.20 $1.50 $624.00 $5.00 $2,080.00 $1.50 $624.00 AND DETAIL(SEE TYP.DETAIL IN 21 416 SFJ SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX 3 6807 SY COLD PLANE 1.60 510,891.20 $1.301 $8,849.10 $1.001 $6,807.00 $1.231 $8,372.61 ADJUST MANHOLE(STORM DRAIN, 300.00 $6,300.00 $315.00 $6,615.00 $290,001 $6,090.00 $300.001 $6,300.00 4 21 EA SEWER,ETC.(TO GkADE ADJUST WATER/GAS VALVES TO 18000 $1960.00 $80.001 $1,760.00 $50.001 $1,100.00 $10.00 $220.00 5 22 KA GRADE ADJUST WATER METER AND 6 2 EA CLEANOUTS TO GRADE 250.00 8500.00 $260.001 $520.00 $340.00 $680.00 $350.001 $700.00 TRAFFIC STRIPING,MARKINGS AND MARKERS PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 133(ALL LEGENDS, 15,000.00 $15,000.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $4,177.79 $4,17779 SYMBOLS,LIMIT LINES AND CROSSWALKS SHALL BE 7 1 LS THERMOPLASTICS( 6 1 LSTRAFFIC CONTROL 15,00000 $15,00000 $4191.901 $4,191.90 $11,000.001 $11,000.00 $10,000.001 $10000.00 TOTAL ADDITIVE MAP 6 I D146,"6.40 $1051000100 $112,"700 $110,000.00 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENINGMARCH 26,2013 APPARENTLOWBIDDER 2 J FY 201212013 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHAB- OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS BROSXBBR'8 BBTumT8 AD Ammice0 AK,,wt L*JW CoUstrnal.Co.Ivc. Hardy X r In9.UAW UNIT I so UNW NBCROTON 7 cost AMOUNT = I AYOMM ST AMOUNT Vern CDp AYOVNT 0.10'ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY INCLUDING PAVEMENT PREPARATION, 75.00 S 22275.00 $64.00 $19,008.00 $66.00 $19.602.00 565.56 S19.47L32 PATCHING,ROUTING AND CRACK 1 297 TONS FILLING 2 1414 BY COLD PLANE 1.60 12,262.0 $1.301 $1,838.20 $1.001 $1,414.00 $1.231 $1.739.22 ADJUST MANHOLE(STORM DRAIN, 300.00 $1.200.00 $315.001 $1,260.00 $290.001 $1,160.00 $300.001 $1,200.00 3 4 EA SEWER,ETC.1 TO GRADE ADJUST WATER/GAS VALVES TO 180.00 $720.00 $80.001 $320.00 $50.001 $200.00 $10.001 $40.00 a 4 EA GRADE ADJUST WATER METER AND 250.00 $500.00 $260.001 $520.00 $340.001 $680.00 $350.001 $700.00 5 2 EA CLEANOUTS TO GRADE TRAFFIC STRIPING,MARKINGS AND MARKERS PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 133(ALL LEGENDS, 15.000.00 115.00.00 $400.00 $400.00 $385.00 $385.00 $2,849.46 $2,849.46 SYMBOLS,LIMIT LINES AND CROSSWALKS SHALL BE 61 11 LS THERMOPLASTICS( 7 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL 15000.00 S15,000.00 $1,653.801 Sl 653.80 S4.350.001 $4 350.00 $5 000.001 SS 000.00 TOTAL ADDHT YAP 7 46a,%Two "5.000.00 x.11 m "7,791.00 "1.000.00 A44O1796Y: w e UK" AMOUNT coer "OUNr ST AYOUeT Ulm tort AMOUNT so um "dllr w: Goer 0.10'ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY INCLUDING PAVEMENT PREPARATION, 75.00 S 27,975.00 $64.00 $23,872.00 566.00 $24,618.00 $65.56 $24,453.88 PATCHING,ROUTING AND CRACK 1 373 TONS FILLING 0.10'SKIN PATCH INCLUDING SAW CUT AND 0.10 COLD PLANE PER PLAN 0.95 $3.657.50 $1.50 $5,775.00 $2.00 $7,700.00 $1.50 $5,775.00 AND DETAIL(SEE TYR DETAIL IN 21 3850 SF SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX 3 2097 SY COLD PLANE 1.60 $3,355.20 $1.301 $2,726.10 $1.001 $2 097.00 $1.231 $2 579.31 ADJUST MANHOLE(STORM DRAIN, 300.00 11,500.00 $315.001 $1,575.00 $290.001 $1,450.00 S300.00 $1,500.00 4 5 EA SEWER,ETC. TO GRADE ADJUST WATER/GAS VALVESTO 180.00 1900.00 $80.001 5400.00 S50.001 $250.00 $10.001 $50.00 5 5 EA GRADE TRAFFIC STRIPING,MARKINGS AND MARKERS PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 133(ALL LEGENDS, 15,000.00 $15,000.00 $2,300.00 $2.300.00 $2,250.00 $2,250.00 $5,641.81 $5,641.81 SYMBOLS,LIMIT LINES AND CROSSWALKS SHALL BE 6 1 LS THERMOPLASTICS( 7 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL 15,000.00 515.000.00 $1,351.901 $1,351.90 $5,000.001 $5.000.00 $6,000.001 56,000.00 TOTAL ADDTNVB YAPe M9.8ef.M FU.000.00 M3.i65.00 $46,000.00 Aealel.e 6m: r. 26 C S AMOUNT eon AMOUNT corn "OUNT UNTTU ;. AMOUNT UNIT B1 RID Bm so UM DNecRUTM9 tort 0.10'ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY INCLUDING PAVEMENT PREPARATION, 7500 $ 64500.00 $64.00 $55,040.00 $66.00 $56,760.00 $65.56 $56,381.60 PATCHING,ROUTING AND CRACK 1 860 TONS FILLING 0.10'SKIN PATCH INCLUDING SAW CUT AND 0.10'COLD PLANE PER PLAN 0.95 5475.00 $1.50 $750.00 $5.00 $2,500.00 $1.50 $750.00 AND DETAIL(SEE TYP.DETAIL IN 21 5001 SF SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX 3 4421 SY COLD PLANE 1.60 $7,073.60 $1.301 S5,747.30 $1001 $4,421.001 $1.231 $5.437.83 ADJUST MANHOLE(STORM DRAIN, 300.00 S2,400.00 $315.001 $2.520.00 $290.001 $2,320.00 S300.001 S2,400.00 4 8 EA SEWER,ETC.)TO GRADE ADJUST WATER/GAS VALVES TO 180.00 $2,700.00 $80.001 $1,200.00 $50.001 $750.00 $10.001 $150.00 5 15 EA GRADE ADJUST WATER METER AND 250.00 51,750.00 5260.001 $1,820.00 $340.001 $2,380.00 5350.001 $2,450.00 6 7 EA CLEANOUTS TO GRADE TRAFFIC STRIPING,MARKINGS AND MARKERS PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 133(ALL LEGENDS, 15.000.00 115,000.00 $800.00 $800.00 $825.00 $825.00 $1,430.57 $1,430.57 SYMBOLS,LIMIT LINES AND CROSSWALKS SHALL BE 71 1 LS THERMOPLASTICS B 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL IS 000.00 $15,000.00 Sq 122.70 $4 122.70 $7 500.00 $7 500.00 $12 000.001 $12 000.00 TOTAL ADDI I YAP IO $1001698.60 479,000.00 *",966.00 "1.000.00 row.a¢eiOA�o AOOmaB Cm Awocn�s $990.890.80 5747,000.00 $795577.00 5507,000.00 2 P104 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 26,2013 4 5 6 7 EY 2012/2013 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHAB- OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS (lentry Brothen BBVia Comtmction Inc. The R.J.S.W.Co. Vance Co oration UNIT To UNIT 23,4,5,9 u411 CORRECTED BID "OUNT CO I NO QT UNIT DEBCR MON OMIT COST UO I MOUNT 0.IO'ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY INCLUDING PAVEMENT $65.00 $361,335.00 73.50 S 408,586.50 S80,65 $448,333.35 S78.40 $435,825.60 PREPARATION,PATCHING,ROUTING 1 5559 TONS AND CRACK FILLING OAO SKIN PATCH INCLUDING SAW CUT AND 0.10'COLD PLANE PER PLAN $2.00 S8,340.00 3.40 $14,178.00 $2.35 $9,799.50 $1.90 $7,923.00 AND DETAIL(SEE TYP.DETAIL IN 2 4170 SF SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX) 3 29165 SY COLD PLANE $1.101 $32,081.50 1.24 $36,164.60 $1.281 $37,331.20 $1.001 $29,165.00 ADJUST MANHOLE(STORM DRAIN, $300.001 $11,700.00 28200 $10,998.00 $300.001 $11,700.00 $295.001 $11,505.00 4 39 EA SEWER,ETC.)TO GRADE ADJUST WATER/GAS VALVES TO $20.00 $1,460.00 60.00 $4,380.00 $85.001 $6,205.00 $240.001 $17,520.00 5 73 EA GRADE ADJUST WATER METER AND $50.001 5900.00 333.00 $5.994.00 $300.001 $5,400.00 $350.001 S6,300.00 6 18 EA CLEANOUTS TO GRADE TRAFFIC STRIPING,MARKINGS AND MARKERS PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 133(ALI,LEGEN DS, $5,700.00 $5,700.00 5,37300 $5,37300 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $6,300.00 $6,300.00 SYMBOLS,LIMIT LINES AND CROSSWALKS SHALL HE 71 11 LS THERMOPLASTICS) 8 I LS TRAFFIC CONTROL $91,000.001 $91,000.00 23,325.00 $23,325.00$25,500.001 $25,500.00 $23,200.001 $23,200.00 TOTAL BABE BID $511,516.5 $508,999.10 $549,669.05 I $537,738.60 BID UNIT DID UNIT DID Additive bid: NO QTY UNIT DMCRI�ONM� 1 UNITCOST AMOUNT CON AMOUNT ICON AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 0.10'ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY INCLUDING PAVEMENT $71.001 $26,625.00 85.30 S 31,987.50 $91.501 $34,312.50 $92.00 $34,500.00 PREPARATION,PATCHING,ROUTING 1 375 TONS AND CRACK FILLING 0.10'SKIN PATCH INCLUDING SAW CUT AND 0.10'COLD PLANE PER PLAN $2,00 $3,040.00 3.40 $5,168.00 $2.35 $3,572.00 $2.50 $3,800.00 AND DETAIL(SEE TYP.DETAIL IN 2 1520 SF SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX) 3 1932 SY COLD PLANE $1.101 $2,125.20 1.24 52,395.68 $1.281 $2,472.96 $1,001 $1,932.00 ADJUST MANHOLE(STORM DRAIN, 41 1 EA SEW F,R,ETC)TO GRADE $300.001 $300.00 282.00 S282.00 $300.001 5300.00 $295.001 S295.00 . ADJUST WATER METER AND $100.001 $500.00 60.00 5300.00 585.001 9425.00 $240.001 $1,200.00 5 51 EAI CLEANOUTS TO GRADE TRAFFIC STRIPING,MARKINGS AND MARKERS PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 133(ALL LEGENDS, $500.00 $500.00 235.00 $235.00 $250.00 $250.00 5450.00 $450.00 SYMBOLS,LIMIT LINES AND CROSSWALKS SHALL BE 6 1 LS THERMOPLASTICS) ] 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL $3,000.001 $3,000.00 1,525.00 51,525.00 $1,400.001 $1,400.00 58,600.001 $8,600.00 TOTAL ADDITIVE MAP 1 810 MOUNT $36.080.20 $41,893.18 1 {42,732.46 650,777.00 S36 OWN AddltWe bid: Map BID UNIT UNIT BID UNIT BID NO QTY UNIT ..RIP1'ION UNIT COT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT CON AMOUNT COT AMOUNT 0.10 ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY INCLUDING PAVEMENT PREPARATION,PATCHING,ROUTING $71.00 $89,460.00 73.00 $ 91,980.00 579.25 $99,855.00 $78.401 $98,784.00 1 1260 TONS AND CRACK FILLING 0.10'SKIN PATC13 INCLUDING SAW CUT AND 0 10'COLD PLANE PER PLAN $2.00 5832.00 JAO $1,414.40 $2.50 $1,040.00 $7.20 $2,995.20 AND DETAIL(SEE TYP.DETAIL IN 1 416 SF SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX) 3 6807 SY I COLD PLANE $1.101 $7,487.70 1.25 58,508.75 $1.281 $8,712.96 $L00 $6,807.00 ADJUST MANHOLE(STORM DRAIN, $300.00 $6,300.00 282.00 $5,922,00 $300.00 $6,30(.00 $295.00 $6,195.00 4 21 JEA SEWER,ETC.)TO GRADE ADJUST WATER/GAS VALVES TO $20.00 $440.00 60.00 SI,320.00 $85.001 $1,870.00 $240.001 $5,280.00 5 22 GRADE ADJUST WATER METER AND S50.001 $100.00 333.00 S666.00 $300.001 $600.00 $250.001 $500.00 6 2 CLEANOUTS TO GRADE TRAFFIC STRIPING,MARKINGS AND MARKERS PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 133(ALI,LEGENDS, $2,000.00 $2000.00 1,755.00 $1,755.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $2,300.00 $2,300.00 SYMBOLS,LIMIT LINES AND CROSSWALKS SHALL BE 7 1 THERMOPLASTICS) B 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL $9,000.001 $9000.00 4,650.00 54,650.00 S2,90(1001 $2,900.00 $10750.001 $10750.00 TOTAL N MAP IT 6 6115,619.70810 MOUNT {116,216.16 {113,027.% $133,611.20 S116.21"R 3 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 26,2013 4 5 6 ] FY 2012/2013 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHAB- OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS Gentey Brothers SUcia Construction Inc. The R.J.noble C9. Vance Co oration UNIT RID UNIT BID AA,Iki�bid,NO QTY UNIT DEBCRU`TIONM•B T UNIT COST AMOUNT COBT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 0.DY ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY INCLUDING PAVEMENT $71 00 $21,087.00 89.00 S 26,433.00 $95.75 $28,437.75 $100.75 $29,922.75 PREPARATION,PATCHING,ROUTING 1 297 TONS AND CRACK FILLING 2 1414 SY COLD PLANE $1.101 $1,555.40 1.25 51,767.50 $1.281 $1,809.92 $1.001 $1,414.00 ADJUST MANHOLE(STORM DRAIN, $300.001 $1,200.00 285.00 $1,140.00 $300.001 $1,200.00 $295.001 $1,180.00 3 4 EA SEWER,ETC.)TO GRADE ADJUST WATER/GAS VALVES TO $20.001 S80.00 60.00 $240.00 585.001 $340.00 $250.001 $1,000.00 4 EA GRADE ADJUST WATER METER AND $50.001 $100.00 333.00 $666.00 $300.001 5600.00 $350.001 $700.00 5 2 EA CLEANOUTS TO GRADE TRAFFIC STRIPING,MARKINGS AND MARKERS PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 133(ALL LEGENDS, $500.00 $500.00 739.00 573900 $375.00 $375.00 $525.00 $525.00 SYMBOLS,LIMIT LINES AND CROSSWALKS SI(ALL BE 6 1 LS THERMOPLASTICS( 7 l LS TRAFFIC CONTROL S3,000.001 $3,000.00 1,325.00 51,325.00 $1,400.001 $1,400.00 $9,000.001 $9,000.00 TOTAI.ADDITIVE Mt 7 $27,522.40 $32,310.50 I $34,162.67 $43,741.75 UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID NO OTT UNIT D6 IUPT1ONMe B UNIT COST I AMOUNT Cc" I AMOUNT COST I AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 0.10'ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY INCLUDING PAVEMENT $71.00 $26,483.00 87.00 S 32451.00 $93.50 $34,875.50 $94.00 $35,062.00 PREPARATION,PATCHING,ROUTING 1 373 TONS AND CRACK FILLING 0.10'SKIN PATCH INCLUDING SAW CUT AND 0.10 COLD PLANE.PER PLAN $2.00 $7,700.00 3,40 S13,090.00 $2.40 $9,240.00 $2.00 $7,700.00 AND DETAIL(SEE TYP.DETAIL IN 2 3850 SF SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX) 3 2097 SY COLD PLANE $1.101 $2,306.70 1.25 12,621.25 $1.281 $2,684.16 $1.001 $2,097.00 ADJUST MANHOLE(STORM DRAIN, $300.001 $1,500.00 285.00 SL425.00 S300A0 $1,500.00 $295.00 $1,475.00 4 51 EA SEWER,ETC.)TO GRADE ADJUST WATER/GAS VALVES TO $20.001 $100.00 60.00 S300.00 585.001 $425.00 $240.001 $1,200.00 5 5 EA GRADE TRAFFIC STRIPING,MARKINGS AND MARKERS PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 133(ALL LEGENDS, $2,500.00 $2,500.00 2,320.00 $2,320.00 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 $2,900.00 $2,900.00 SYMBOLS,LIMIT LINES AND CROSSWALKS SHALL BE 6 1 LS THERMOPLASTICS 7 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL $3,000,001 $3,000.00 2,200.00 12,20000 $1,400.001 $1,400.00 $9,000.001 $9,000.00 TOTAI.ADDITIVE MAP$BID AMOUNT $43,589.70 $54,407.25 $52,920.66 $59,434.00 Min 58910 ^'AIL fir,1 'Y''n'- a i aw Additive bid: Map 10 BID UNIT Y UNIT BID UNIT BIO NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 0.10'ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY INCLUDING PAVEMENT $71.00 $61,060.00 76.50 S 65,790.00 $80.00 $68,800.00 580.80 $69,488.00 PREPARATION,PATCHING,ROUTING 1 860 TONS AND CRACK FILLING 0.10'SKIN PATCH INCLUDING SAW CUT AND 0.10'COLD PLANE PER PLAN $2.00 $1,000.00 3,40 51,700.00 $2.40 $1,200.00 $6.20 $3,100.00 AND DETAIL(SEE 9YR DETAIL IN 2 500 SF SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX) 31 44211 SY COLD PLANE $1.10 $4,863.10 1.25 $5,526.25 $1.281 $5,658.88 $1.00 $4,421.00 ADJUST MANHOLE)STORM DRAIN, $300.001 $2,400.00 285.00 52,280.00 $300.001 $2,400.00 $295.001 $2,360.00 4 8 EA SEWER,ETC.)TO GRADE ADJUST WATER/GAS VALVES TO $20.001 $300.00 60.00 $900.00 585.001 $1,275.00 $240.001 $3,600.00 5 15 EA GRADE ADJUST WATER METER AND $100.001 $700.00 338.00 $2,366.00 $300.001 $2,100.00 $350.001 $2,450.00 6 7 EA CLEANOUTS TO GRADE TRAFFIC STRIPING,MARKINGS AND MARKERS PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 133(ALL LEGENDS, $1,000.00 $1,000.00 820.00 5820.00 5800.00 $800.00 $1,120.00 $1,120.00 SYMBOLS,LIMIT LINES AND CROSSWALKS SHALL BE 7 1 LS THERMOPLASTICS) e I LS TRAFFIC CONTROL S6,000.001 $6,000.00 3,300.00 53,300.00 $1,750.001 $1,750.00 $10,750.001 $10,750.00 TOTAL ADDITIVE MAP 10 MDAMOUM $77,323.10 $82.682.25 $83,983.88 $97,289.00 m,mip TOTAL eASe MD&ND ADDMWE Inc AMOUNTS $812,661.60 BDAMOUNT... $836,508.43 $886$00.68 5922,591.55 4 P106 STAFF REPORT - ENGINEERING SU'RVICFs DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 C',UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer o5j�- Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $327,858.75, TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $32,785.88, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION — SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS PROJECT TO BE FUNDED FROM GAS TAX RT7360 FUNDS AND PROPOSITION 42 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NOS. 1174303- 5650/1022174-0 AND 1190303-565011022190-0 RESPECTIVELY AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $209,900.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1190303-5650/1022190-0 FROM PROPOSITION 42 FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council Accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $327,858.75, to the lowest responsive bidder, All American Asphalt, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $32,785.88, for the Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation — Slurry Seal of Various Streets project to be funded from Gas Tax RT7360 and Proposition 42 Funds, Account Nos. 1174303-5650/1022174-0 and 1190303-5650/1022190-0 respectively and appropriate an additional amount of $209,900.00 to Account No. 1190303-5650/1022190-0 from Proposition 42 Fund balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 26, 2013, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate for the base bid was $271,800.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of work consists of weed kill and removal, crack sealing, slurry sealing and striping. It is estimated that approximately five jobs will be either generated or sustained in connection with this project. The contract documents call for thirty (30)working days to complete this construction. Res bmitted, Mark A. euer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/RMD/SH:ls Attachments P107 o VICINITY MAP ri All 3 - •� _BLS i, MAP-3 YAP-5 LENRI AVE. , [_ VIVA NA■1(LM UPLAND j I II -- -� _ svN r s MAP-2—_ usanc•ve YAP-4 dip r- 1 U�t --]I— � 4J�J ._, � � ImTHIL1,7�CLV� ki . _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PON vu 2012/2013 LOCAL SIMEST oIIB NT REHA IIHAT[ox (BLUM REAL) N AT N.T.B. CEP[IXS4Mh e'� '1ml VIYf9WNW�II.AUWW9l4f.VO�1.MNhY VYYYfx111M 'rte 43w:i� h .�S =- ..�_ -- § oci 00 , r) --y— co k § ) keg \ § ® ■ § \ k LO 00 00 d ) B � oci \ 6s eq . 2 � §-- --------- . It j � 00 � § § 2 § 0(i 00 m § cq ee — —------ § 2 . . § § } 2 ) ® \ r ] o _ E2a kwk \} { { \{\ \ / k ) - j ) ` \ ®ƒ 0 ) ) ) \ j \ } — t § 29 P109 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jason C. Welday, Traffic Engineers-- J Subject: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE WITHIN STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY ON ROUTE 1-15 WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) FOR MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO THE INTERSTATE 15 AT BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Agreement for Landscape Maintenance within State Highway Right of Way on Route 1-15 within the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement upon approval of the final format by Caltrans. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In November 2005, the voters of San Bernardino County approved Measure 12010-2040 a 30-year extension of the original Measure I half-cent sales tax increment approved in April 1990. As part of the planning process for Measure 1 2010-2040, SANBAG along with member agencies prepared a Nexus Study to identify regional transportation projects that could be funded with revenues generated by the measure. The Nexus Study identified a number of interchange improvement projects within the Valley Freeway Interchange Program including the improvements needed at the Interstate 15/Base Line Road Interchange. Final design of the 1-15 at Base Line Road Interchange Improvement Project is nearing completion and construction is anticipated to begin toward the end of 2013. Since the project is to be constructed on the Interstate System, Caltrans is required to review and approve the project's plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) as part of the overall process to receive authorization to proceed with advertising for construction bids. The City's design consultant AECOM, Inc. expects to finalize the project plans later this month. The subject agreement is one of the various agreements that will need to be executed by the City related to the construction and maintenance of the project. This particular agreement is required to be executed prior to receiving approval of the PS&E by Caltrans. The agreement contains provisions which set forth the responsibilities of both the City and Caltrans with regard to the maintenance of landscaping to be installed as part of the 1-15 at Base Line Road Interchange Improvement Project. The responsibilities have been divided into two areas for the purposes of this agreement as shown on Exhibit "A" of the agreement, "Landscape Improvement Work Area (to be maintained in by the City in Perpetuity)" (City Maintained Area) and "Landscape Pilo CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Caltrans Landscape Maintenance Agreement May 1, 2013 Page 2 Improvement Work Area (to be maintained by State after plant establishment and a 3-year City maintenance period)" (State Maintained Area). Under this agreement, the City will be responsible for maintaining the State Maintained Area for a period of three (3) years following the plant establishment period. The plant establishment period is a three (3) year period beginning with acceptance of the landscaping improvements by Caltrans. The design of the landscaping to be installed in this area has included a reduced scope in order to minimize maintenance efforts required initially by the City and ultimately by Caltrans. While the State Maintained Area landscaping has been designed to minimize maintenance efforts, the landscaping to be installed in the City Maintained Area which primarily lies adjacent to Base Line Road and East Avenue has been designed to meet the City's standard streetscape requirements. Efforts have been made in the design to reduce maintenance efforts where possible while maintaining the quality of landscaping that characterizes the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City will be responsible for maintenance in these areas in perpetuity. It should be noted that portions of both the State Maintained Area and City Maintained Area fall within the City of Fontana. Caltrans policy requires the lead agency, in this case the City, to take responsibility for all local agency allocated maintenance duties outlined in the agreement regardless of jurisdiction. In order to delegate responsibility for those areas within the City of Fontana, staff is working to prepare a separate Landscape Maintenance Agreement between the City and the City of Fontana. This separate agreement will be brought before Council with a request for approval at a later date. The costs for maintenance of the landscaping improvements in the State Maintained Area during the three (3) year plant establishment period and the additional three (3) year plant maintenance period will be covered as part of the capital costs for the project and therefore eligible expenses for partial reimbursement under Measure I. The total maintenance period of six (6) years will be separated into an initial one (1) year plant establishment period under the construction contract and a five (5) year maintenance period under a separate contract issued by the City. Based on the 95% Project Plans, the estimated annual cost for the five-year period is approximately $150,000 (present value). It is anticipated SANBAG and the City of Fontana will reimburse these costs at a rate of 50% and 16.5% respectively. The landscaping improvements in the City Maintained Area will be maintained for a one (1) year plant establishment period as part of the construction contract. Upon completion of the one (1) year plant establishment period, the City will begin maintenance activities at its cost in perpetuity. The cost for this maintenance will need to be included in the annual budget. Sixteen percent (16%) of the costs for the City Maintained Area will be funded from Landscape Maintenance District 9 and the remainder will be funded out of the General Fund. Based on the 95% Project Plans, the estimated annual cost for this maintenance is $22,000 (present value). It is anticipated that 24% of this cost will be borne by the City of Fontana for the portion of the landscaping improvements within its jurisdiction. The attached agreement is currently under review by Caltrans' Legal Department. Staff anticipates that only minor modifications to the form of the agreement will be required based on their review. Typically, this agreement would be presented for approval by the City Council after Caltrans' Legal Department has approved the form of the agreement. In this case, in order to receive approval of the PS&E by mid-May and meet certain funding deadlines, staff is recommending that City Council P111 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Caltrans Landscape Maintenance Agreement May 1, 2013 Page 3 approve this agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute its final form. Should the final form contain modifications that are not conforming to the intent of the attached agreement, staff will bring the final agreement before the City Council at a later meeting for further action. The agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney's office. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JCW:ls Attachments: Exhibit"A"—Agreement for Landscape Maintenance within State Highway Right of Way on Route 1-15 within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. P112 AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE WITHIN STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY ON ROUTE 1-15 WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THIS AGREEMENT is made and executed effective this day of 20 by and between the State of California, acting through its Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "STATE," and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," together referred to as "PARTIES". WITNESSETH RECITALS: I. PARTIES desire to work together to allocate their respective obligations relative to newly constructed or revised improvements within STATE's right of way by a Cooperative Agreement (s) dated November 30, 2009, Permit Number (s) EA 49710. 2. This Agreement addresses CITY responsibility for the landscaping, planting, irrigation systems, hardscaping, mulches, litter and weed removal, , sidewalks, (collectively the "LANDSCAPING") placed within State Highway right of way on State Route I-15, as shown on Exhibit A, attached to and made a part of this Agreement. Section I In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained, CITY and STATE agree as follows: a) PARTIES have agreed to an allocation of maintenance responsibilities that includes, but is not limited to, inspection, providing emergency repair, replacement, & maintenance, (collectively hereinafter "MAINTAIN/MAINTENANCE") of LANDSCAPING as shown on said Exhibit "A b) When a planned future improvement is constructed and/or a minor revision has been effected with STATE's consent or initiation within the limits of the STATE's right of way herein described which affects PARTIES' Division of Maintenance's responsibility as described herein, PARTIES will agree upon and execute a new dated and revised Exhibit which will be made a part hereof and will thereafter supersede the attached original Exhibit "A" to thereafter become a part of this Agreement. The new exhibit can be executed only upon written consent of the Parties hereto acting by and through their authorized representatives. No formal amendment to this Agreement will be required. P113 Section II CITY agrees, at CITY expense, to do the following: a) CITY may install, or contract with a licensed contractor with appropriate class of license in the State of California, to install {if relevant} and thereafter will MAINTAIN (Section 27 of the Streets and Highways Code) LANDSCAPING conforming to those plans and specifications (PS&E) pre-approved by STATE. b) CITY will submit the final form of the PS&E, prepared, stamped and signed by a licensed landscape architect, for LANDSCAPING to STATE's District Permit Engineer for review and approval and will obtain and have in place a valid necessary encroachment permit prior to the start of any work within STATE'S right of way. All proposed LANDSCAPING must meet STATE's applicable standards. c) CITY shall ensure that LANDSCAPED areas designated on Exhibit "A" are provided with adequate scheduled routine MAINTENANCE necessary to MAINTAIN a neat and attractive appearance. d) An Encroachment Permit rider may be required for any changes to the scope of work allowed by this Agreement prior to the start of any work within STATE's right of way. e) CITY contractors will be required to obtain an Encroachment Permit prior to the start of any work within STATE's right of way. f) To furnish electricity for irrigation system controls, water, and fertilizer necessary to sustain healthy plant growth during the entire life of this Agreement. g) To replace unhealthy or dead plantings when observed or within 30 days when notified in writing by STATE that plant replacement is required. h) To prune shrubs, tree plantings, and trees to control extraneous growth and ensure STATE standard lines of sight to signs and corner sight distances are always maintained for the safety of the public. i) To MAINTAIN, repair and operate the irrigation systems in a manner that prevents water from flooding or spraying onto STATE highway, spraying parked and moving automobiles, spraying pedestrians on public sidewalks/bike paths, or leaving surface water that becomes a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian/bicyclist travel. 2 P114 j) To control weeds at a level acceptable to the STATE. Any weed control performed by chemical weed sprays (herbicides) shall comply with all laws, rules, and regulations established by the California Department of Food and Agriculture. All chemical spray operations shall be reported quarterly (form LA17) to the STATE to: the District Maintenance at 464 W. 4'h St, San Bernardino, CA 92401. k) To expeditiously repair any STATE facility damage ensuing from CITY'S LANDSCAPE presence and, activities, including, but not limited to, damaged caused by plants and plant roots and to reimburse STATE for its costs to repair the STATE facility damage ensuing from CITY's LANDSCAPE presence and activities should STATE be required to cure a CITY default. 1) To remove LANDSCAPING and appurtenances and restore STATE owned areas to a safe and attractive condition acceptable to STATE in the event this Agreement is terminated as set forth herein. m) To furnish electricity and MAINTAIN landscape lighting system and controls for all landscape lighting systems installed by and for CITY. n) To inspect LANDSCAPING on a regular monthly or weekly basis to ensure the safe operation and condition of the LANDSCAPING. o) To expeditiously MAINTAIN, replace, repair or remove from service any LANDSCAPING system component that has become unsafe or unsightly. p) To allow random inspection of LANDSCAPING, landscape lighting systems and signs by a STATE representative. q) To keep the entire landscaped area policed and free of litter and deleterious material. r) All work by or on behalf of CITY will be done at no cost to STATE. Section III STATE agrees to do the following: a) May provide CITY with timely written notice of unsatisfactory conditions that require correction by the CITY. However, the non-receipt of notice does not excuse CITY from maintenance responsibilities assumed under this Agreement. b) Issue encroachment permits to CITY and CITY contractors at no cost to them. 3 P115 Section IV Legal Relations and Responsibilities: a) Nothing within the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this Agreement, or affect the legal liability of either PARTY to this Agreement by imposing any standard of care respecting the design, construction and maintenance of these STATE highway improvements or CITY facilities different from the standard of care imposed by law. b) If during the term of this Agreement, CITY should cease to MAINTAIN the LANDSCAPING to the satisfaction of STATE as provided by this Agreement, STATE may either undertake to perform that MAINTENANCE on behalf of CITY at CITY's expense or direct CITY to remove or itself remove LANDSCAPING at CITY's sole expense and restore STATE's right of way to its prior or a safe operable condition. CITY hereby agrees to pay said STATE expenses, within thirty (30) days of receipt of billing by STATE. However, prior to STATE performing any MAINTENANCE or removing LANDSCAPING, STATE will provide written notice to CITY to cure the default and CITY will have thirty (30) days within which to effect that cure. c) Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction arising under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including, but not limited to, tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation and other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under this Agreement with the exception of those actions of STATE necessary to cure a noticed default on the part of CITY. d) Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction arising under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless STATE and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including, but not limited to, tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under this Agreement. 4 P116 e) Prevailing Wage Requirements: Labor Code Compliance: If the work performed on this Project is done under contract and falls within the Labor Code section 1720(a)(1) definition of a "public work" in that it is construction, alteration, demolition, installation, repair or maintenance CITY must conform to the provisions of Labor Code sections 1720 through 1815, all applicable regulations and coverage determinations issued by the Director of Industrial Relations. CITY agrees to include prevailing wage requirements in its contracts for public work. Work performed by CITY'S own forces is exempt from the Labor Code's Prevailing Wage requirements. f) Prevailing Wage Requirements in Subcontracts CITY shall require its contractors to include prevailing wage requirements in all subcontracts funded by this Agreement when the work to be performed by the subcontractor is a "public work" as defined in Labor Code Section 1720(a)(1). Subcontracts shall include all prevailing wage requirements set forth in CITY's contracts. g) Insurance CITY and their contractors shall maintain in force, during the term of this agreement, a policy of general liability insurance, including coverage of bodily injury liability and property damage liability, naming the State of California, its officers, agents and employees as the additional insured in an amount of$1 million per occurrence and $2 million in aggregate. Coverage shall be evidenced by a certificate of Insurance in a form satisfactory to Department that shall be delivered to Department with a signed copy of this Agreement. h) Termination This Agreement may be terminated by timely mutual written consent by PARTIES, and CITY's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement may be grounds for a Notice of Termination by STATE. i) Term of Agreement This Agreement shall become effective on the date first shown on its face sheet and shall remain in full force and effect until amended or terminated at any time upon mutual consent of the parties or until terminated by STATE for cause. 5 P117 PARTIES are empowered by Streets and Highways Code Section 114 & 130 to enter into this Agreement and have delegated to the undersigned the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the respective agencies and covenants to have followed all the necessary legal requirements to validly execute this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE CITY OF RANCHO DEPARTMENT OF CUCAMONGA TRANSPORTATION By: By: L. Dennis Michael Malcolm Dougherty MAYOR Director of Transportation Attest: By: By: Janice C. Reynolds Deputy District Director CITY Clerk Maintenance By: By: James L. Markman ** Attorney CITY Attorney Department of Transportation "Approval by STATE'S Attorney is not required unless changes are made to this farm, in which case, the draft will be submitted to Headquarters for review and approval by STATESs Attorney as to form and procedures. 6 P118 N^ I I I I r✓ se S' � oa I I i I V z 5t g W a �o �. Z< Z< aF aiW<m a Q mz W p mf— _-Z - u I 1WW �WM2W V I J2_ C' II II 1 I OmQ OmQRau ^� � _ C �� �.IrZW mWy a y W<? Wy<ax� L.LJ N Z 1W $W;i Z <a ` J J 1 U<U<r U�<J7 ^ N2 mwu m t I J J m J mWU m < b'ry� N N V a �U SAY 15V3 a^V JSV3 i� iD mu J �f aW� yU�p O<� r aia I ■ �lz 1 < \ � U < a \ Oo=3 < Z6 2Or \ Q� C 1 mU a W m «W �a<Q. J I CL P119 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000.00 TO RICHARD HEATH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ENERGY CONSERVATION AUDITS AND IMPLEMENT A CUSTOMER DIRECT INSTALLATION PROGRAM FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY CUSTOMERS TO BE FUNDED FROM 17063035300 UTILITY PUBLIC BENEFIT FUND RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $100,000.00 to Richard Heath and Associates, Inc. (RHA) for energy conservation audits and to implement a customer direct installation program for Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) customers to be funded from Account 1706303-5300 Utility Public Benefit Fund. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS California Assembly Bill 2021 (AB 2021) (Levine, Chapter 734, Statues of 2006) was signed into law in September 2006. Section 3 of the statue requires publicly-owned utilities (POUs) to identify all potential achievable cost-effective electricity efficient savings and adopt annual targets for energy efficiency savings and demand reduction for the next 10-year period. As part of RCMU's ongoing effort to continue to promote energy efficiency and meet the adopted goals of AB 2021, staff found the need to offer programs that would provide RCMU customers with the necessary tools to reduce energy and save money. The Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA) issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Small Business Audit and Energy Efficiency Implementation Program in January 2012. As a result of the RFP, Richard Heath and Associates, Inc. (RHA) was chosen to implement their programs for SCPPA members with a contract expanding their services. RCMU received approval from the Purchasing Division to "piggy-back" on SCPPA's RFP and utilize the following services provided by RHA: Energy Conservation Audits RHA will use an energy survey tool to efficiently conduct a thorough audit of existing energy measures located at each RCMU customer's site. Using the tool, RHA will then customize an Energy Savings Report containing energy efficiency retrofit recommendations. The results will provide the customer with customized options that maximize RCMU incentives in the most cost effective way and provide the most efficient energy savings. P120 City Council Staff Report Re: Professional Service Agreement May 1, 2013 Customer Direct Installation Program In an effort to reduce RCMU customer's out-of-pocket costs and promote energy efficiency, RCMU will provide a monetary allowance to assist the customer in installing the recommended improvements. The customer can select the recommendations they would like to implement from the Energy Savings Report and RHA will provide the installation for each measure. Any cost over the RCMU allowance will be paid by the customer. It is recommended the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement for energy conservation audits and to implement a customer direct installation program for Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility customers to be funded from Account 17063035300 Utility Public Benefit Fund. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:FL/alrw Attachment(s) P121 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 6th day of February,2013, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation ("City") and Richard Heath and Associates, Inc., a California Corporation ("Contractor"). RECITALS A. City has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the following services: Energy Efficiency Audit and Implementation Program ("the Project"). B. Contractor has submitted a proposal to perform the services described in Recital "A", above, necessary to complete the Project. C. City desires to engage Contractor to complete the Project in the manner set forth and more fully described herein. D. Contractor represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional manner. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Contractor's Services. 1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Contractor to perform all services described in Recitals "A" and "B" above, including, but not limited to comprehensive energy audits, implement direct installation program and provide energy efficiency consulting services, all as more fully set forth in the Contractor's proposal, dated February 6, 2013 and entitled "Scope of Work", attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by Contractor are set forth in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein as "the Services." In the event of any inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control. 1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City, the Contractor will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project desired by the City. Contractor agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based PSA without professional liability insurance(contractor) Page I Last Revised. 1110611011 P122 upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a revision or revisions to Contractor's compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Contractor by more than ten percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in writing by City's City Manager without amendment. 1.3 Time for Performance. Contractor shall perform all services under this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a "Schedule of Performance", if such Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit"N/A". 1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into this Agreement, Contractor hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Contractor hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing the Services. 1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Contractor represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Contractor (a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. Contractor represents that Contractor, to the extent required by the standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Contractor discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Contractor shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Contractor's risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative. 2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be 1 year(s) and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties signature (the "Effective Date"). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not be provided until this Agreement has been executed and requirements have been fulfilled. Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of 3 years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 14 herein. Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager's approval, subject to pricing review, and in accordance to all Terns and Conditions stated herein unless otherwise provided in writing by the City. 3. Compensation. 3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Contractor as set forth in Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Contractor shall not exceed $100,000.00 (One Hundred Thousand dollars), including all out of PSA without professional liability insurance(contractor) Page 1 Last Revised. 1110612012 P123 pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Manager or City Council as may be appropriate pursuant to Resolution No. 87-602B. City shall not withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Contractor be entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed. The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall compensate Contractor for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A. 4. Method of Payment. 4.1 Invoices. Contractor shall submit to City monthly invoices for the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Contractor in writing within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts. 4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not-to-exceed amounts set forth in Section 3. 4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Contractor relating to services hereunder shall be available for review and audit by the City. 5. Representatives. 5.1 City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City's representative shall be Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager, or such other person as designated in writing by the City ("City Representative"). It shall be Contractor's responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and Contractor shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative. 5.2 Contractor Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, Hector Brolo is hereby designated as the principal and representative of Contractor authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith ("Contractor's Representative"). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Contractor's Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. PSA without professional liability insurance(contractr) Page 3 Last Revised: 1110612012 P124 Therefore, the Contractor's Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Contractor and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Contractor may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City. 6. Contractor's Personnel. 6.1 All Services shall be performed by Contractor or under Contractor's direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including, without limitation, a City business license as required by the City's Municipal Code. 6.2 Contractor shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4. 6.3 Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all employees' and subcontractors' wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Contractor certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 6.4 Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Contractor's violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Contractor under this Agreement any amount due to City from Contractor as a result of Contractor's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6. 7. Ownership of Work Product. 7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files, drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared, created or provided by Contractor in the course of performing the Services, including any and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same (collectively, "Work Product"), are considered to be "works made for hire" for the benefit of the City. Upon payment being made, and provided Contractor is not in breach of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes, sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Contractor under this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by PSA without professional liability insurance(contractor) Page 4 Last Reoised.1110612012 P125 Contractor. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Contractor or its representative, Contractor shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no circumstances shall Contractor fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings, reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery, notwithstanding any disputes between Contractor and City concerning payment, performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. City's reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City's sole risk. 7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above, the Contractor shall be deemed to grant and assign to City, and shall require all of its subcontractors to assign to City, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to the Work Product and the Project itself, and Contractor shall disclaim and retain no rights whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law. City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project. 7.3 Title to Intellectual Propert y. Contractor warrants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City has full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City's use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Contractor shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event City's use of any of the Work Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use thereof is enjoined, Contractor, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to continue using the Work Product by suspension of any injunction or by procuring a license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it becomes non- infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 8. Status as Independent Contractor. Contractor is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Contractor shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of City. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall PSA without professional liability insurance(contractor) Page 5 Last Revised. 1110612012 P126 not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or employees are in any manner employees of City. Contractor shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Contractor under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Contractor shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Contractor and Contractor's employees 9. Confidentiality. Contractor may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Contractor covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Contractor or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not be disclosed by Contractor without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Contractor's covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the Contractor from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably necessary for the Contractor to defend itself from any legal action or claim. 10. Conflict of Interest. 10.1 Contractor covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Contractor further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Contractor shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Contractor shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Contractor "financially interested" (as provided in California Government Code §§1090 and 87 100) in any decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Contractor has been retained. 10.2 Contractor further represents that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Contractor, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Contractor has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Contractor, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Contractor hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift. 10.3 Contractor has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, PSA without professional liability insurance(contractor) Page 6 Lost Revised: 1110612012 P127 in this transaction or in the business of Contractor, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Contractor at any time during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited "conflict of interest" under applicable laws as described in subsection 10.1. 11. Indemnification. 11.1 To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, (collectively, "Indemnitces"),free and harmless with respect to any and all damages, liabilities, losses, reasonable defense costs or expenses (collectively, "Claims"), including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts, omissions, activities or operations of Contractor or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, Contractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall defend Indemnitces in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City's choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including actual attorney's fees and experts' costs incurred in connection with such defense. The indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement provided, however, that the Contractor shall have no obligation to indemnify for Claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees. 11.2 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that they may possess against Contractor because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. 11.3 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, Contractor, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor. 11.4 Survival. The provisions of this Section I I shall survive the termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against Contractor shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision. 12. Insurance. 12.1 Liability Insurance. Contractor shall procure and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the PSA without professional liability insurance(contractor) Page 7 Last Revised: 1110612012 P128 performance of the services hereunder by Contractor, and/or its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. 12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City, coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code I (any auto). (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, and Employer's Liability Insurance. 12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: (1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers' Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law. (4) The Insurance obligations under this Agreement shall be the greater of(i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by the Contractor; or (ii) the minimum Insurance coverages and limits shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified limits and coverage required which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the City. No representation is made that the minimum Insurance requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the obligations of the Contractor under this agreement. 12.4 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and shall not reduce the limits of coverage. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any required insurance policy and endorsements. PSA without professional liability insurance(contractor) Page 8 Last Revised. 1110612012 P129 12.5 Other Insurance Provisions. (1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain the following provisions on a separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Contractor; products and completed operations of Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; and/or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor. The coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named insured. (2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials shall be in excess of Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (4) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after 30 days prior written notice by first class mail has been given to City (ten (10) days prior written notice for non-payment of premium). Contractor shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to City prior to implementation of a reduction of limits or material change of insurance coverage as specified herein. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall expressly waive the insurer's right of subrogation against City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. PSA without professional liability insurance(contractor) Page 9 Last Revised: 1110612012 P130 (6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and which is rated ANII or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide. (7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided. (8) Each policy shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any policy limits. (9) Contractor shall provide any and all other insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as required by the City in any request for proposals applicable to this Agreement. 12.6 Evidence of coverage.Prior to commencing performance under this Agreement, the Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates and original endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s), (2) Worker's Compensation waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability declarations or endorsement page listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the City before Contractor commences performance. If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Contractor shall provide City with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance. 12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors performing work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of any such subcontractor's work. Contractor shall require its subcontractors to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of its subcontractors to include these same provisions in its contract with any sub- subcontractor. 13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Contractor's performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Contractor shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might require. City shall compensate Contractor for any litigation support services in an amount to be agreed upon by the parties. PSA without professional liability insurance(contractor) Page 10 Last Revised: 1110612012 P131 14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to Contractor. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall pay Contractor for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the termination, provided Contractor is not then in breach of this Agreement. Contractor shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim for compensation. City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party. Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10) business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for any Additional Services required because of such changes. 15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Contractor's and City's regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this Section. All notices shall be addressed as follows: If to City: City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 If to Contractor: Contract Administration, Richard Heath and Associates Inc. 590 W. Locust Avenue, Suite 103 Fresno, CA 93650 16. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance of this Agreement, Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. 17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Contractor's PSA without Professional liability insurance(contractor) Page 11 Last Revised: 1110612012 P132 obligations hereunder without City's prior written consent. Except as provided herein, any attempt by Contractor to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect. 18. Compliance with Laws. Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time Contractor performs the Services. CONSULTANT is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and compliance with other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, CONSULTANT agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations can be found at http:H%vAw.dir.ca.,ov/dlsr/DPreWai4eDetennination.htm CONSULTANT shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services, available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the Project site. CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 19. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Contractor constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Contractor, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default. 20. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of experts. 21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. 22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San Bernardino County Superior Court. PSA without professional liability insurance(eonlraetwJ Page 12 Last Revised. 1110612012 P133 23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement or who drafted that portion of the Agreement. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and integrated agreement between Contractor and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Contractor Name: Richard Heath and City of Rancho Cucamonga Associates, Inc. By: By: �Q2d,� 02.27- 13 Name Date Name Date C-weF fri"ANCAA-L OFFICd✓(L Title Title City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Approv�yer II, Purchasing Alternate,Risk Management Coordinator PSA xvthoul professional liability insurance(contractor) Page 13 Last Revised- 1110612012 P134 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES PSA without professional liability insurance(contractor) Page 14 Last Revised: 1110612012 P135 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES Small Business Audits and Energy Efficiency Implementation Program (direct installs) RHA proposes a comprehensive savings program plan incorporating outreach, implementation and administration for commercial customers (i.e. <30 M). This program will offer the following seven components: 1. Customer marketing and Education RHA's trained professional Energy Specialists will conduct door-to-door canvassing of customers based on customer lists provided by RCMU. The Energy Specialists will market the program and educate customers on the benefits of the program. The goal of the Energy Specialist is to secure the customer's approval to conduct an energy survey and improve the prospect of participation. 2. Energy Survey There will be two energy survey options offered by the program: Standard Small Business Survey Once approval has been secured, the Energy Specialist will use a RHA-developed survey tool to efficiently conduct a thorough inventory of existing energy measures located at each customer's site. Advanced Survey RHA will provide RCMU with energy audits that surpass the basic small business energy audit. For example, these audits may involve medium to large sized businesses that have large amounts of machinery or warehouse space. RHA has developed an Advanced Energy Audit Tier to address these customer exceptions and help garner energy savings opportunities for these large customers. 3. Customized Retrofit Recommendations Using the survey tool a customized Energy Savings Report containing energy efficiency retrofit recommendations will be created for each business. The report will provide each customer with customized options that maximize the utility incentives in the most cost-effective scenarios to create the biggest energy savings to their facility. The report will be prepared in an easy-to- read, non-technical format to ensure the proposed retrofits and comprehensive, customers will also be provided with the option to purchase recommended retrofits. For more ambitious customers RHA offers, at the same pre-negotiated prices, the option to purchase recommendations, which exceed the utility provided allowance; this will assist customers in capturing these additional savings opportunities. 4. Installation of Recommended Retrofits RHA will manage every aspect of the installation of retrofit measures as approved by RCMU and the business owner. RHA will utilize fully trained in-house installation crews or specially selected subcontractors for all installation services to ensure: 1) excellent customer satisfaction; 2) a high quality retrofit; and 3) the most cost-effective delivery of services. Wherever possible, RHA will hire personnel and contractor companies from within the service territory of RCMU. 5. Refer to Schedule 1, attached hereto, for itemized list of installation measures and associated cost. P136 6. Program Reporting RHA understands that RCMU is required to manage energy efficiency programs on extremely limited operating budgets. As such, a key component of the RHA Program is timely comprehensive and flex-reporting to optimize the cost-effectiveness and operating efficiencies with the program. RHA will provide detailed reports for each small business site for the six key areas below: 1. Customer Participation Volume Report; 2. Customer Energy Inventory of Measures Report; 3. Report of Budget Allocated to Installations and Customer Use of these Funds; 4. Report of Installed Measures and Total Energy Savings Captured; 5. Customized Energy Savings Report; and 6. Additional; Report Details as Required by the Public Utilities Additionally, RHA is prepared to provide ad hoc reports as requested and/or required per RCMU. The administrative team dedicated to the program will be available to RCMU for additional support required for program success. To capture program data efficiently and effectively, RHA has designed a robust database to support the reporting needs of RCMU. The database is supported by RHA's in-house Information Services Department consisting of a team of experienced professional application developers. Systems developed by the IS Department allow for a customized application development to meet the needs of each individual program administered by RHA. This team has a broad understanding of database technologies and the power of using data to track, organize, analyze and report on RHA-managed programs. 6. Additional Value-Added Service Options RHA's past experience working with other Municipal Utilities' over the past eight years has given us great insight into how we can build on the success of this program and go beyond the direct install measures to offer customers additional value and the opportunity to capture additional savings opportunities. RHA may provide additional value-added service options to enhance the base programs for RCMU. 1. RCMU Program Portal — RHA can also provide a customized RCMU web portal to provide Business Incentive Information to include, but not be limited to, other energy or utility sponsored programs for renewable energy, demand response, tax credits, gas & water utility programs, etc. A customized program portal helping provide customers the opportunity to participate in other public programs help meet a key program objective. P137 Exhibit A, Schedule 1 MEASURE CODE MEASURE DESCRIPTION TUBE LIGHTING LGT362 4ft 4L 32W T8 High Pert w/EB $ 78.00 LGT367 4ft 4L 32W T8 High Perf w/2EB & interactive effects $ 83.00 LGT373 4ft 3L 32W T8 High Perf w/EB $ 73.00 LGT376 4ft 3L 32WT8 High Perf w 12EB & interactive effects $ 91.00 LGT377 4ft 2L w/EB Shop light (New Fixt) $ 101 AO LGT383 4ft 2L 32W T8 High Perf w/EB $ 63.00 LGT381 4ft 2L T8 U6 w/EB $ 63.00 LGT393 4ft 1 L 32W T8 High Pert w/EB $ 58.00 LGT401 8ft 4L T8 High Perf w/2EB $ 169.00 LGT403 8ft 2L T8 w/EB (New Fixt) $ 141.33 LGT404 8ft 4L 28-32W w/EB & retro kit $ 95.00 LGT405 8ft 2L T8 w/EB $ 85.00 LGT406 8ft 2L 28-32W w/EB & retro kit $ 105.00 LGT407 8ft 1 L T8 w/EB $ 75.00 LGT408 6ft 4L 28-32W w/EB & retro kit $ 105.00 LGT409 6ft 2L 28-32W w/EB & retro kit $ 90.00 LGT415 3ft 4L 25W 2nd gen T8 w/EB (6-ft conv kit) $ 84.38 LGT410 3ft 2L 25W 2nd gen T8 w/EB $ 65.50 LGT412 3ft 1 L 25W 2nd gen T8 w/EB $ 60.00 LGT416 2ft 4L F17 2nd gen T8 w/EB $ 65.00 LGT420 2ft 2L 32T8 U6 w/EB (Banning $61) $ 75.50 LGT422 2ft 2L F17 2nd gen T8 WEB $ 65.00 LGT425 2ft 1 L F17 2nd gen T8 w/EB $ 52.50 LGT426 4ft tube guard $ 107 LGT427 8ft tube guard $ 10.00 LGT618 Delamp: 2 foot lamp $ 24.65 LGT619 Delamp: 3 foot lamp $ 26.35 LGT620 Delamp: 4 foot lamp $ 28.05 LGT621 Delamp: 8 foot lamp $ 29.75 LGT622 Reduced Wattage 4 foot T-12 to T-8 Retrofit(25W, 28W) $ 51.00 LGT623 Reduced Wattage 4 foot Lamp used with Existing Ballast(25W, 28W) $ 16.41 LGT449 20W Circline Replacement to CFL Fixture 14W CFL Fixture+Lamp $ 61.30 15W CFL Fixture+Lamp $ 90.50 LGT450 22W Circline Replacement to CFL Fixture 16W CFL Fixture+Lamp $ 90.50 18W CFL Fixture+Lamp $ 92.50 LGT451 30W Circline Replacement to CFL Fixture 23W Fixture+Lamp $ 65.00 24W Fixture+Lamp $ 71.50 26W Fixture+Lamp $ 76.98 P138 MEASURE CODE MEASURE DESCRIPTION TUBE LIGHTING 30W CFL Fxture $ 91.10 4ft T8 to Daylight Harvesting Ballast with Sensor LGT451-B 2 T8 Ballasts only $ 127.39 LGT452 3 T8 Ballasts only $ 141.37 LGT453 4 T8 Ballasts only $ 141.37 4ft T12 to Daylight Harvesting Ballast with Sensor LGT454 2 T8 Ballasts and Lamp $ 127.39 LGT455 3 T8 Ballasts and Lamp $ 141.37 LGT456 4 T8 Ballasts and Lamp $ 141.37 4ft F25T8 retrofit with Anti-Striation Ballast LGT457 4ft 4 Lamp F25T8 Retrofit $ 78.00 LGT458 4ft 3 Lamp F25T8 Retrofit $ 72.00 LGT459 4ft 2 Lamp F25T8 Retrofit $ 637 LGT460 4ft 1 Lamp F25T8 Retrofit $ 55.00 4ft F28T8 retrofit/ Delamping LGT461 4ft 3 Lamp F28T8 Retrofit $ 73.00 LGT462 4ft 2 Lamp F28T8 Retrofit $ 64.00 4ft F28T8 New Fixture/ Delamping LGT463 4ft 3 Lamp F28T8 Fixture $ 200.20 LGT464 4ft 2 Lamp F28T8 Fixture $ 193.60 LGT465 4ft 1 Lamp T8 HO Fixture $ 187.00 LGT466 4ft 1 Lamp T5 HO Fixture $ 193.60 4ft F25T8 retrofit/ Delamping with Anti-Striation Ballast LGT610 4ft 3 Lamp F25T8 Retrofit $ 72.00 LGT611 4ft 2 Lamp F25T8 Retrofit $ 63.00 LGT612 4ft 1 Lamp F25T8 Retrofit $ 55.00 4ft F25T8 New Fixture/Delamping with Anti-Striation Ballast LGT467 4ft 3 Lamp F25T8 Fixture $ 223.89 LGT468 4ft 2 Lamp F25T8 Fixture $ 216.13 LGT469 4ft 1 Lamp T8 HO Fixture $ 330.02 LGT470 4ft 1 Lamp T5 HO Fixture $ 242.00 8ft T12 retrofit to Two4ft T8 Tamdon LGT471 4ft 2 Lamp T8 retrofit $ 138.60 LGT472 4ft 2 Lamp T8 HO Fixture $ 138.60 HID Replacement to Linear Florescent Fixture LGT473 4ft 4 Lamp T8 High Bay Fixture $ 239.00 LGT474. 4ft 2 Lamp T5HO High Bay Fixture $ 247.50 LGT475 4ft 6 Lamp T8 High Bay Fixture $ 280.18 LGT476 4ft 4 Lamp T5110 High Bay Fixture $ 300.03 LGT477 4ft 8 Lamp T8 High Bay Fixture $ 367.70 LGT478 4ft 6 Lamp T5110 High Bay Fixture $ 357.40 LGT479 4ft 10 Lamp T8 High Bay Fixture $ 411.83 P139 MEASURE CODE MEASURE DESCRIPTION TUBE LIGHTING LGT480 4ft 8 Lamp T5HO High Bay Fixture $ 470.65 8ft T12 HO Exterior Retrofit to 8ft T8 HO LGT481 8ft 1 Lamp T8HO Exterior Retrofit $ 67.50 LGT482 8ft 2 Lamp T8HO Exterior Retrofit $ 87.75 LGT483 8ft 3 Lamp T8HO Exterior Retrofit $ 155.25 LGT484 8ft 4 Lamp T8110 Exterior Retrofit $ 17570 LGT485 1 8ft 6 Lamp T8HO Exterior Retrofit $ 263.25 LGT428 CFL 5-13W 5W Screw-n CFL $ 11.50 7W Screw-in CFL $ 11.50 9W Screw-in CFL $ 11.50 9W Globe CFL $ 11.50 11 W Screw-in CFL $ 11.50 13W/60W Spiral - Indoor CFL $ 11.50 LGT429 CFL 14-26W 14W A-Type Screw-in $ 19.00 14W Screw-in CFL $ 19.00 15W Globe $ 19.00 23W Tear Drop $ 19.00 20W Screw-in CFL $ 19.00 25W Screw-in CFL $ 19.00 LGT430 CFL >= 27W 27W -35W Spiral Indoor CFL $ 14.50 LGT432 CFL 11 W R20 9W R20 Flood Type $ 21.00 9W R20 Flood Type $ 21.00 11 W R20 Flood Type R20 2700K $ 21.00 11 W R20 Flood Type R20 4000K $ 21.00 LGT433 CFL 15W R30 CFL Indoor Flood, 14 W R20 $ 21.00 CFL Indoor Flood, 15 W R30 2700K $ 21.00 CFL Indoor Flood, 15 W R30 3200K $ 21.00 CFL Indoor Flood, 15 W R30 4000K $ 21.00 CFL Indoor Flood, 15 W R30 6400K $ 21.00 LGT434 CFL 20W R40 19 W Screw-in Par 38 CFL $ 21.00 20 W Screw-in Par 38 CFL $ 21.00 CFL Indoor Flood, 20 W R40 2700K $ 21.00 CFL Indoor Flood, 20 W R30 3200K $ 21.00 LGT435 CFL 25W R40. CFL Indoor Flood, 25 W R30 2700K $ 21.00 P140 MEASURE CODE MEASURE DESCRIPTION TUBE LIGHTING CFL Indoor Flood, 25 W R30 3200K $ 21.00 CFL Indoor Flood, 25 W R30 4000K $ 21.00 CFL Indoor Flood, 25 W R30 6400K $ 21.00 LGT436 CFL 27W Wall Fixture $ 65.50 LGT437 CFL 65W Floodlight Fixture $ 79.09 CFL Wall Fixture $ 94.50 LGT438 CFL 65W Yard light Fixture $ 777 PAR16/MR16 incandescent to LED 2-10W PAR16/MR16 LGT539 2W PAR16 $ 57.06 LGT540 3W PAR16 $ 52.83 LGT541 4W PAR16 $ 54.81 LGT542 6W PAR16 $ 61.32 LGT542a 10W PAR16 $ 63.63 PAR20 Incandescent to LED 3-9W PAR20 LGT543 3W PAR20 $ 65.98 LGT544 4W PAR20 $ 71.04 LGT545 6W PAR20 $ 72.49 LGT546 8W PAR20 $ 73.94 PAR30 Incandescent to LED 7-19W PAR30 LGT547 7W PAR30 $ 73.61 LGT548 10W PAR30 $ 80.84 LGT549 11W PAR30 $ 82.29 LGT550 13W PAR30 $ 84.46 LGT551 14W PAR30 $ 86.63 LGT552 15W PAR30 $ 89.23 LGT553 19W PAR30 $ 95.31 PAR38 Incandescent to LED 16-23W PAR38 LGT554 16W PAR38 $ 95.63 LGT555 20W PAR38 $ 98.81 LGT556 23W PAR38 $ 115.88 4ft LED Retrofit LGT486 4ft 4L LED Retrofit 76W $ 366.66 LGT487 4ft 3L LED Retrofit 57W $ 287.59 LGT488 4ft 2L LED Retrofit 38W $ 208.52 LGT489 4ft 1L LED Retrofit 19W $ 109.29 4ft LED Retrofit/Delamping LGT490 4ft 3L LED Retrofit 57W $ 287.59 LGT491 4ft 2L LED Retrofit 38W $ 208.52 LGT492 4ft 1L LED Retrofit 38W $ 109.29 4ft LED New Fixture/ Delamping LGT493 4ft 3L LED Fixture 57W $ 331.09 P141 MEASURE CODE MEASURE DESCRIPTION TUBE LIGHTING LGT494 4ft 2L LED Fixture 38W $ 246.58 LGT495 4ft 1L LED Fixture 38W $ 141.92 Chandelier Incandescent replacement to LED Chandelier LGT496 3W LED Tear Drop Dimmable Candelabra $ 54.38 LGT497 3W LED Flame Tip Dimmable Candelabra $ 55.10 Incandescent Replacement to LED LGT498 7W A-type LED $ 58.45 LGT499 8W A-type LED $ 59.17 LGT500 9W A-type LED $ 59.90 LGT501 10W A-type LED $ 61.34 LGT502 11 W A-type LED $ 63.51 LGT503 12W A-type LED $ 6578 LGT504 7W Globe-Type LED $ 58.45 LGT505 8W Globe-Type LED $ 59.17 LGT506 9W Globe-Type LED $ 59.90 LGT507 10W Globe-Type LED $ 61.34 LGT508 11 W Globe-Type LED $ 59.40 LGT509 12W Globe-Type LED $ 59.40 HID Replacement to LED LGT510 30W LED Canopy Retrofit Outdoor $ 417.65 LGT511 40W LED Canopy Retrofit Outdoor $ 458.43 LGT512 50W LED Module (High bay/Outdoor) $ 465.23 LGT513 60W LED Module (High bay/Outdoor) $ 478.82 LGT514 80W LED Canopy Retrofit Outdoor $ 492.41 LGT515 90W LED Module (High bay/Outdoor) $ 56078 HID Fixture Replacement to PSMH LGT516 150W Pulse Start Metal Halide (PSMH) Fixture $ 223.44 LGT517 250W Pulse Start Metal Halide (PSMH) Fixture $ 223.44 LGT518 400W Pulse Start Metal Halide (PSMH) Fixture $ 223.44 LGT519 320W Pulse Start Metal Halide (PSMH) Fixture $ 22144 LGT520 750W Pulse Start Metal Halide (PSMH) Fixture $ 482.40 HID Retrofit to Induction LGT521 70W Induction Lamp Retrofit $ 376.48 LGT522 80W Induction Lamp Retrofit $ 411.76 LGT523 100W Induction Lamp Retrofit $ 435.30 LGT524 120W Induction Lamp Retrofit $ 46174 LGT525 150W Induction Lamp Retrofit $ 494.18 LGT526 200W Induction Lamp Retrofit $ 564.78 LGT527 250W Induction Lamp Retrofit $ 68744 LGT528 300W Induction Lamp Retrofit $ 823.62 LGT529 400W Induction Lamp Retrofit $ 1,106.02 P142 MEASURE CODE MEASURE DESCRIPTION TUBE LIGHTING HID Fixture Replacement to Induction LGT530 70W Induction Lamp Fixture $ 656.55 LGT531 80W Induction Lamp Fixture $ 677.72 LGT532 100W Induction Lamp Fixture $ 717.97 LGT533 120W Induction Lamp Fixture $ 751.86 LGT534 150W Induction Lamp Fixture $ 792.09 LGT535 200W Induction Lamp Fixture $ 900.11 LGT536 250W Induction Lamp Fixture $ 953.05 LGT537 300W Induction Lamp Fixture $ 1,069.54 LGT538 400W Induction Lamp Fixture $ 1,376.64 LGT624 Existing 400-watt Metal Halide to 4-Lamp High Bay $ 261.38 LGT625 Existing 1,000-watt MH to 4-Lamp HB $ 261.38 LGT626 Permanent 400-watt MH Lamp Removal $ 90.10 LGT439 Exit Sign 5 watts or less w/battery back-up Red Replacement Battery Back-up $ 122.50 Green Replacement Battery Back-up $ 122.50 LGT440 Exit Sign 5 watts or less without back-up Red Replacement Battery Replacement $ 78.25 Green Replacement Battery Replacement $ 78.25 LGT500d LED Open signs replaces Neon $ 167.88 LGT500 Photo luminescent Exit Sign 0.3 watts Green or Red Photo luminescent Exit Sign (Single sided) $ 216.00 Green or Red Photo luminescent Exit Sign (Double sided) $ 434.70 HVACS202 Reflectivity Window Film Low Reflectivity Window Film (per square fool) $ 8.00 Medium Reflectivity Window Film (per square foot) $ 8.00 High Reflectivity Window Film (per square foot) $ 8.00 HVACS203 HVAC Tune-Up Basic Diagnostic < = 5 Ton Unit $ 210.00 HVACS205 HVAC Tune-Up Basic Diagnostic> = 5 Ton Unit $ 210.00 HVACS206 HVAC Tune-Up Basic Diagnostic > = 10 Ton Unit $ 230.00 HVACS222 HVAC Tune-Up Comprenhesive Diagnostic < = 10 Ton Unit $ 530.00 HVACS208 Duct Sealing, Non-Residential CZ 15 (per Ton) $ 348.50 HVACS209 Ceiling Fan with Thermostatic Control 30"to 36" (tied to the HVAC $ 2,160.00 System) HVACS210 Ceiling Fan with Thermostatic Control 42"to 44" (tied to the HVAC $ 2,300.00 System P143 MEASURE CODE MEASURE DESCRIPTION TUBE LIGHTING HVACS211 Ceiling Fan with Thermostatic Control 52"to 56" (tied to the HVAC $ 2,645.00 System) HVACS217 Refrigerant, Non-Residential CZ 15 (per Ton) $ 161.50 HVACS220 Dirty Condenser Coil Cleaning $ 85.00 HVACS207 7 Day Programmable Thermostat $ 150.00 5 Day Programmable Thermostat $ 100.00 Dual Thermostat $ 150.00 HVACS208 All in One Thermostat $ 150.00 HVACS209 Reprogramming/Education Existing Programmable Thermostats $ 50.00 HVACS210 Thermostat Lock Box $ 55.73 APPLS008 Refrigeration Curtains Med. Per unit $ 216.00 APPLS27 Freezer Curtains Per unit $ 216.00 APPLS009 Refrigeration Tune-up APPLS009 Walk-In Cooler $ 180.00 APPLS009 Walk-In Freezer $ 180.00 APPLS009 Under Counter& Self Contained $ 180.00 APPLS009 Split Systems w/Multiple Coils $ 180.00 APPLS010 Refrigerator Main Cooler Door Gaskets Med. Temp. Per Linear ft. $ 13.50 APPLS011 Freezer Main Cooler Door Gaskets Low Temp. Per Linear ft. $ 16.00 APPLS012 Door Closer $ 234.63 APPLS013 Heavy duty UV Refrigeration Pipe-Insulation $ 10.00 APPLS21 Anti-Sweat Heat(ASH)Controls (or Humidistat Controls) Freezer $ 626.88 APPLS22 Anti-Sweat Heat(ASH)Controls (or Humidistat Controls)Cooler $ 584.38 APPLS23 Replace Standard Fan Motors with Electronically Commutated Motors i $ 250.75 APPLS24 Install Fan Controlers $ 286.40 APPLS25 Suction Line Insulation (per linear ft) $ 10.00 APPLS26 Refrigerant Charge for refrigerators/freezer(up to 2 Ibs) $ 135.32 Refrigeration T8 Retrofit APPLS014 4ft 1 L F32 T8 (Low Temp) $ 65.00 APPLS015 4ft 1 L F40 T8 (Low Temp) $ 65.00 APPLS016 6ft 1 L F70 T8 (Low Temp) $ 80.50 APPLS017 8ft 1 L F96 T8 (Low Temp) $ 87.40 Refrigeration LED Retrofit APPLS018 4ft 1 L LED (Low Temp) $ 126.52 APPLS018a 5ft 1 L LED (Low Temp) $ 141.00 APPLS019 6ft 1 L LED (Low Temp) $ 156.21 APPLS020 4ft 2L LED (Low Temp) $ 253.04 APPLS020a 8ft 1 L LED (Low Temp) $ 192.00 P144 MEASURE CODE MEASURE DESCRIPTION TUBE LIGHTING LGT445 Wall sensor $ 100.00 LGT447 Lighting timers Manuel Lighting Timer $ 100.00 Electronic Lighting Timer $ 100.00 Time Clock $ 100.00 LGT448 Lighting dimmers sliding Toggle Switch (Single) $ 100.00 Toggle Switch w/Cover(Single) $ 100.00 APPLS016 Appliance Timer 120V 10A $ 95.00 LGT599 Photo Cell Sensor $ 83.70 LGT600 Ceiling Mount Sensor $ 186.30 LGT601 4ft 6 lamp High Bay Multi-Level Lighting Control $ 324.00 LGT602 4ft 4 lamp High Bay Multi-Level Lighting Control $ 216.00 LGT603 HB3x0-Lx High Bay Line Voltage Passive Infrared Occupancy Sensor $ 199.80 VDM01 Vending Miser Unit and Installation $ 231.19 VDM02 Plug Miser Unit and Installation $ 167.57 VDM03 Cooler Miser Unit and Installation $ 192.00 VDM04 Snack Miser Unit and Installation $ 180.50 VDM05 VendingMiser/PlugMiser/CoolerMiser Installation Only $ 65.00 VDM06 Trickle Star Device $ 62.10 WTHRS005 Seal Doors - Mohair per Door linear ft $ 10.77 WTHRS007 Door Sweeps per Door $ 69.00 WTHRS008 Caulking (Per Tube) $ 11.25 WTHRS009 Expandable Foam $ 26.73 WTHRS006 Seal Windows- Silicon per Window(Per Tube) $ 25.00 WTHRS010 External Water Heater Insulation (_> 50 Gal Tank)and piping $ 560.00 insulation (up to 20ft WTHRS010 Water Heater Tank and Pipe Insulation $ 460.00 WHS15 Low Flow Showerhead $ 35.00 WHS16 Standard Faucet Aerators $ 11.00 WHS66 Non-Standard Faucet Aerators $ 35.94 WHS17 Repair Toilet Flapper $ 167 WHS24 Standard Pre-Rinse Spray Valve $ 78.00 Non-Standard Pre-Rinse Spray Valve $ 150.00 WHS13 Dual Flush Flushometer, Retrofit- Pipe Only $ 155.00 WHS14 Flow Meter Bag $ 30.00 WHS19 Lavatory Faucet $ 8479 WHS19 Single Handle $ 116.88 WHS30 Double Handle $ 84.59 WHS31 Electronic Faucet $ 446.76 P145 MEASURE CODE MEASURE DESCRIPTION TUBE LIGHTING WHS32 Basin Faucets $ 167.24 WHS33 Metering Faucets Single Handle $ 159.66 WHS34 Metering Faucets Double Handle $ 317.26 WHS20 Kitchen Faucets Regular $ 85.00 WHS35 Kitchen Faucets Single Handle ADA $ 202.50 WHS36 Kitchen Faucets Wall Mount $ 165.86 WHS37 Laundry Faucet $ 11073 WHS38 Bar Faucet $ 92.31 WHS39 Non-Standard Kitchen Faucet $ 165.00 WHS40 Non-Standard Lavatory Faucet $ 128.57 WHS41 Non-Standard Metering Faucet $ 348.99 WHS42 Non-Standard Basin Faucet $ 183.96 WHS43 Non-Standard Bar Faucet $ 101.54 WHS44 Non-Standard Laundry Faucet $ 121.47 WHS21 Pipe Insulation per sq. ft $ 10.00 WHS25 Water Broom $ 100.00 WHS11 High Efficiency Toilet Round 1.28 GPF $ 350.00 WHS26 High Efficiency Toilet Elongated 1.28 GPF $ 360.00 W HS45 High Efficiency Toilet-Right Handed Elongated $ 421.00 WHS18 Minor Pipe Leaks Repair $ 50.00 WHS22 High Efficiency Urinal $ 900.00 WHS23 Zero Water Use Urinal $ 900.00 Urinal Flushometer WHS46 1.5 GPF Flushometer $ 272.50 WHS47 1.0 GPF Flushometer $ 272.50 WHS48 0.5 GPF Flushometer $ 362.50 WHS49 1.28 GPF Electronic Flushometer $ 897.50 WHS50 1.0 GPF Electronic Flushometer $ 897.50 WHS51 0.5 GPF Electronic Flushometer $ 747.50 WHS52 1.6 GPF Electronic Flushometer $ 887.50 WHS53 1.1 to 1.6 GPF Uppercut Dual Flush Flushometer(Sloan) $ 910.00 WHS54 1.1 to 1.6 GPF Uppercut Dual Flush Flushometer(Sloan) Retrofit $ 397.50 New Technology High Efficiency Toilets WHS55 Toilet Pressure Assisted (1.1 GPF) Elongated Bowl $ 800.00 WHS56 Dual Flush Toilets (0.8 partial to 1.28 Full GPF) Round $ 534.60 WHS57 Dual Flush Toilets (0.8 partial to 1.28 Full GPF) Elongated $ 720.90 WHS58 Niagara Vacuum Assisted (0.8 GPF) Round $ 548.10 WHS59 Niagara Vacuum Assisted (0.8 GPF) Elongated $ 60470 WHS60 Flapperless Toilet(1.28 GPF) Round $ 545.00 WHS61 Flapperless Toilet(1.28 GPF) Elongated $ 590.00 WHS62 Non-Standard Efficiency Toilet(1.28) $ 720.00 High Efficiency Hand Held Shower Head P146 MEASURE CODE MEASURE DESCRIPTION TUBE LIGHTING WHS63 2.5 GPM Shower Head $ 17.79 WHS64 1.6 GPM Shower Head $ 23.19 WHS65 2.0 GPM Shower Head $ 23.19 CTRLS01 Demand Side Electrical System Control and Monitoring $ 4,200.00 EM01 Motors 1.5 HP NEMA Premium Eff. $ 594.00 EM02 . Motors 2 HP NEMA Premium Eff. $ 616.00 EM03 Motors 3 HP NEMA Premium Eff. $ 858.00 EM04 Motors 1.5 HP NEMA Premium Eff. totally enclosed $ 1,188.00 EM05 Motors 2 HP NEMA Premium Eff. totally enclosed $ 1,232.00 EM06 Motors 3 HP NEMA Premium Eff. totally enclosed $ 1,716.00 EM07 Variable-Speed Water Pump <= 5 HP $ 1,980.00 ACS22 Room AC Replacement 5,000- 5,999 BTU per Unit $ 375.00 ACS23 Room AC Replacement 6,000-6,999 BTU per Unit $ 594.00 ACS24 Room AC Replacement 7,000-7,999 BTU per Unit $ 850.00 ACS12 Room AC Replacement 8,000-8,999 BTU per Unit $ 897.00 ACS25 Room AC Replacement 9,000 -9,999 BTU per Unit $ 915.00 ACS26 Room AC Replacement 10,000 - 10,999 BTU per Unit $ 945.00 ACS27 Room AC Replacement 11,000- 11,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,050.00 ACS13 Room AC Replacement 12,000- 12,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,073.00 ACS17 Room AC Replacement 13,000 - 13,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,158.00 ACS18 Room AC Replacement 14,000 - 14,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,220.00 ACS19 Room AC Replacement 15,000 - 15,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,230.00 ACS20 Room AC Replacement 16,000 - 16,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,230.00 ACS21 Room AC Replacement 17,000- 17,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,230.00 ACS14 Room AC Replacement 18,000-23,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,230.00 ACS15 Room AC Replacement 24,000 BTU per Unit $ 1,230.00 ACS16 Power Cord $ 33.72 ACS17 Pig Tails $ 28.32 Heat Pump Units (HP) ACS28 Room HP Replacement 5,000-5,999 BTU per Unit $ 431.25 ACS29 Room HP Replacement 6,000-6,999 BTU per Unit $ 683.10 ACS30 Room HP Replacement 7,000- 7,999 BTU per Unit $ 908.27 ACS31 Room HP Replacement 8,000- 8,999 BTU per Unit $ 963.70 ACS32 Room HP Replacement 9,000-9,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,012.00 ACS33 Room HP Replacement 10,000 - 10,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,105.00 ACS34 Room HP Replacement 11,000- 11,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,105.00 ACS35 Room HP Replacement 12,000- 12,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,120.00 ACS36 Room HP Replacement 13,000- 13,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,230.00 ACS37 Room HP Replacement 14,000 - 14,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,230.00 P147 MEASURE CODE MEASURE DESCRIPTION TUBE LIGHTING ACS38 Room HP Replacement 15,000- 15,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,250.00 ACS39 Room HP Replacement 16,000- 16,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,250.00 ACS40 Room HP Replacement 17,000 - 17,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,250.00 ACS41 Room HP Replacement 18,000 -23,999 BTU per Unit $ 1,270.00 ACS42 Room HP Replacement 24,000 BTU per Unit $ 1,270.00 ACS43 AC/HP Drain Pan $ 60.96 ACS44 AC/HP Adapter Plug $ 13.36 WHS66 Pressure Assist Replacement tank $ 351.00 LABORS06 High Ceiling charge per fixture $ 3.50 LABORS07 Scissor Lift per day $ 280.00 LABOR04 RHA Labor(hourly) $ 50.00 LABOR05 Small Business Energy Audit& Report less than 30kW $ 200.00 LABOR06 Advanced Energy Audit& Report $ 500.00 LABOR07 Measurements and Verification (Metering hourly rate) $ 110.00 LABOR08 IT Consulting Services (hourly) $ 90.00 LABOR09 Design and Consulting (hourly) $ 110.00 LABORIO Engineering PE Engineer)services (hourly) $ 110.00 P148 EXHIBIT A-2 SCOPE OF SERVICES Comprehensive Energy Audits. Enerav Efficiency Consultina Services for Larae Commercial and Industrial Customers (C & Il Program Administration RHA's proven energy efficiency program administration experience will produce results for RCMU large commercial and industrial (C & 1) customers, while maximizing energy savings. RHA provides a practical, common sense approach to program administration which will ensure that all possible efficiency programs are leveraged for maximum benefit to the customer and the utility. It is critical that customers not only participate in the array of energy efficiency programs offered, but that they are educated so that their daily energy use practices and equipment purchasing decisions are transformed. Long-term conservation and efficiency only truly occurs when those making the decisions and operating the building understand its importance and impact. Targeted Customer Segments RHA will target commercial customers operating in facilities ranging in size from less than 10,000 square feet to 75,000 square feet, in addition to industrial (non-structural facilities) for the Comprehensive Energy Audit Program. Based on the customer list provided by RCMU, RHA will target high-energy use customers who have not yet been served by the program. Subcontractors RHA will administer and direct the work of all subcontractors, providing scheduling, training, monitoring, and evaluation of all subcontractor work. Benchmarks/Timeline The RHA Program Manager will set program benchmarks to ensure that program goals will be met. The Program Timeline will be developed and approved to achieve the benchmarks (see page 15 for the proposed Program Timeline). Delivery/Procedures In order to leverage as many incentive programs as possible, RHA will strategically use the Comprehensive Energy Audit Program to introduce the many rebates available to customers. RHA recognizes that some incentive applications may come directly to customers through avenues other than the Comprehensive Energy Audit Program. RHA will ensure that those customers will continue to receive outstanding service as well. Using the Comprehensive Energy Audit to introduce the incentive programs provides a robust energy efficiency solution to customers seeking maximum savings. Incentive programs to be introduced through the Comprehensive Energy Audit process include: • Lighting incentive program • Exit sign program • Energy efficiency incentives program P149 • Heat pump incentives program RHA actually integrates program marketing with auditing function. By merging the marketing and auditing functions, we have found that we have greater capacity to reach program goals, and minimize lost opportunities while meeting the needs of C & I customers. Comprehensive Energy Audit A main responsibility of the auditor is to provide outstanding customer service and energy information to business owners and building operators, and to promote RCMU incentive programs. The RHA auditor will perform energy audits and evaluation of targeted businesses within RCMU territory. RHA will work with RCMU to identify eligible customers through their database. After determining which businesses to target, RHA auditors will visit businesses, describe the program and its benefits and secure customer program participation. Once the customer is enrolled, the energy audit can be scheduled and conducted. The RHA auditor will describe the program in full and outline the energy consuming systems that will be reviewed. The auditor will conduct an audit of energy efficiency equipment using energy auditing forms. Systems include: • Lighting • HVAC • Motors Building Envelope • Water Heating • Refrigeration Industrial Processes The RHA auditor will conduct a Comprehensive Energy Audit and prepare detailed reports by collecting general information for each large commercial facility. The RHA auditor will inventory all existing systems and equipment and provide a complete analysis of the customer's energy consumption in a detailed report on the building's operations. The audit report will include information about: • A customer's kW demand and kWh usage • Recommended energy efficiency equipment replacement; and • Will present total savings calculations utilizing assumptions, projections and baselines, which best represent the true value of future energy or operational savings for the customer's facilities. The RHA auditor will provide the customer with a report that details the projected energy and cost savings to be obtained at the facilities with the installation of the recommended measures. RHA will also provide RCMU with a copy of the Energy Audit Report furnished to the customer with all of the assumptions used to derive Base Year as well as the Comprehensive Energy Audit methodology. Some customers may require additional analysis and study to determine a recommendation that will maximize energy efficiency. Preliminary data will be shared with the customer, and a re-visit will be scheduled to review the results of the audit, after RCMU has reviewed and approved the P150 Energy Audit Report. Department staff will attend this re-visit to review the final results of the Energy Audit Report with the customer. Metering and Monitoring RHA will conduct metering and monitoring activities only with advance notification of and permission by RCMU program manager. This process can provide valuable information about a building's operation. This can include lighting, air conditioning, and central plant/chiller monitoring. Design Review for C & I Customers RHA will provide plan review of new construction and renovation plans for C & I customers as needed by the participating Public Utility upon request. Ensuring that Title 24 requirements are met or exceeded is the goal of this process to maximize a structure's energy efficiency as well as available incentives for each identified measure. Each measure will include cost effectiveness information and a cost benefit analysis, with the format determined by the participating Public Utility. RHA will utilize its internal Technical Department to provide additional engineering support. This team will be led by the Director of Technical Resources, Nathan Aronson PE, CEM. Incentive Programs RHA will promote RCMU Incentive Programs as a cost-effective way to achieve energy savings for C & I customers. RCMU will be presented as an ally of the business in holding energy costs down and in achieving their energy savings goals. RHA will not only promote, but also educate the customer on: • Lighting Incentive • Exit Sign Retrofit • Energy Efficiency Incentives • Heat Pump Incentives In addition, RHA will share any new or emerging RCMU program(s) that will be of benefit to the business with the customer. Those businesses pursuing incentives, but not through a Comprehensive Energy Audit process, will receive the same excellent level of service and support offered to those businesses participating in the Comprehensive Energy Audit Program. Whether these businesses are exploring incentives on their own, or have been referred by RCMU, they will be educated and included in the incentive programs as they are qualified and as they choose. For customers pursuing an incentive program: • A written Energy Audit Report will be prepared related to that incentive, including an analysis of existing equipment, the proposed upgrade(s), amount of energy to be saved in the upgrade, payback information, the amount of the incentive and the amount of the installation cost of the equipment upgrade. • RHA will assist the customer in completing the incentive application form. • RHA will submit the Host Pre-Approval Form (HPF) to RCMU approval before any work begins. Included will be the customer agreement that incentive payments are • entirely contingent on installation of approved projects as included on the form. P151 • RHA will ensure that all approved projects are installed within 60 days of HPF approval. • RHA will verify installation of the approved equipment and submit and submit a Project Completion Notice (PCN) to RCMU attesting to the installation of the equipment, allowing RCMU to begin processing the incentive for payment to the customer. For customers who wish to participate in an incentive program on their own (not through the Comprehensive Energy Audit Program), RHA will: • Visit the business and inspect the equipment before and after the installation. • Complete the HPF as well as the PCN and submit these items to the participating • Public Utility. • Prepare the incentive form and submit it to RCMU for approval and payment. • Educate the customer about other Incentive programs and the Comprehensive • Energy Audit Program, if they have not yet participated. Equipment Installation Customers who wish to participate in an incentive program will receive assistance from RHA in identifying capable and experienced contractors to install their replacement equipment. RHA's long-time experience in working with subcontractors will be extended to customers to ensure customer satisfaction with the overall program as achieved. RHA will do this by: 1. Assisting customers by recommending solid and experienced contractors to the customer from which to select. 2. Assist in securing bids in a timely manner. 3. Offer to review the provided bid and help the customer understand the bid details. RHA's intention in providing subcontractor guidance is not to keep the customer from working with a preferred contractor, but to ensure that they are receiving the highest value for their money. Quality AssuranceNerification/Inspection RHA excels at working with subcontractors, ensuring that they are scheduled properly, that they show up and perform quality installations. RHA will ensure that all installations are completed within 60 days. Scheduling for the installation will take place as soon as possible after HPF approval so that customers can begin enjoying energy savings. RHA performs quality assurance on all subcontractors, develops benchmarks and reviews the quality of the installation work. RHA will inspect all equipment installed and ensure that the subcontractor has explained to the customer the proper operation of the equipment as well as submit the PCN to the participating Public Utility for processing of the customer incentive payment. Comprehensive Energy Audit Process Optimization and Evaluation Together with RCMU, RHA will help chart the course of future Comprehensive Energy Audit efforts by reviewing past results of the program and developing a plan to ensure the maximum energy savings are achieved. P152 It is important to know the impact the Comprehensive Energy Audit program has had on energy savings and demand reduction. Having an articulated energy savings goal is important in determining future energy needs as well as future programs. RHA's team includes experts who have practical experience in maximizing energy savings for the utility programs. RHA understands how to work within program parameters to achieve goals, and can make recommendations for future program adjustments. Based on the plan developed, there will be re-visits to some of those customers who have the greatest possibility of increased energy savings and demand reduction. A thorough review of past information, particularly energy use pre-and post-installation, as well as current facility data is needed to make proper recommendations for equipment replacement or program development. RHA will work with RCMU to ensure that the Comprehensive Energy Audit program is achieving desired results for customers and maximizing energy savings for the participants of this approved program. Invoice Submittal Once the work is complete, invoices with supporting materials will be prepared and presented monthly to RCMU for payment according to the terms of the signed contract. Refer to Schedule 2, attached hereto, for itemized list of installation measures and associated cost. Reporting RHA will report monthly on: • Business contacted and audited • Customers approved • Measures installed • kWh savings • Dollars of incentives paid and estimated to date • Dates of request, approval, purchase, installation and verification • As well as other items requested by the participating utility Semi-annual and annual reports will coincide with RCMU fiscal year; due at a date outlined in the contract and agreed program timeline. A big picture view of the program will be provided along with all of the necessary detail including audits conducted, incentives approved, installations completed and energy savings achieved. Any interesting or helpful anecdotal information will also be included for purposes of future program planning. P153 RCMU Energy Audit and Direct Installation Guidelines 1. HVAC Tune Ups are limited to 50 per fiscal year or$10,000.00 whichever is exceeded first and are on a first come, first serve basis. Customers requesting HVAC tune ups after the funds have been depleted for the year will be put on a waiting list until the next year or when funds become available. 2. Direct Installation requests by customers will need approval from RCMU before installation can begin. P154 Exhibit A-2 Schedule 2 Energy Audit Pricing Level I ASHRE Audit for Commercial Facilities 0 to 75,000 sqft Audit $0.050 Per Sq. Ft. Level I ASHRE Audit for Commercial Facilities over 75,001 sqft Audit $0.045 Per Sq. Ft. Level I ASHRE Audit for Industrial (non-structural Facilities) Audit $2.00 Per kW Additional to the square footage charge Level II ASHRE Audit for Commercial Facilities 0 to 75,000 sqft Comprehensive Audit $0.100 Per Sq. Ft. Lighting Audit $0.025 Per Sq. Ft. HVAC Audit $0.035 Per Sq. Ft. Level II ASHRE Audit for Commercial Facilities over 75,001 sqft Comprehensive Audit $0.065 Per Sq. Ft. Lighting Audit $0.020 Per Sq. Ft. HVAC Audit $0.030 Per Sq. Ft. Level II ASHRE Audit for Industrial non-structural Facilities Comprehensive Audit $4.00 Per kW Additional to the square footage charge Level III ASHRE Audit LABOR10 Engineering (PE Engineer)services (hourly) $110.00 Per Hour Administrative Incentives LABOR07 Measurements and Verification (Metering hourly rate) $110.00 Per Hour LABORO8 IT Consulting Services(hourly) $ 90.00 Per Hour LABOR09 Design and Consulting (hourly) $110.00 Per Hour LABOR10 Engineering (PE Engineer) services (hourly) $110.00 Per Hour LABOR04 RHA Labor(hourly) $ 50.00 Per Hour • Lighting Coupon • Exit Sign Retrofit Coupon • Heat Pump Coupon • Energy Efficiency Coupon • Energy Efficiency work paper processing P155 EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE FOR PERFORMANCE PSA without professional liabilig,insurance(contractor) Page 15 Last Revised: 1110612012 P156 Attachment A — Sample Waiver of Subrogation (Sample Only—Not all forms will look identical to this Sample) TRAVELERST WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY POLICY ENDORSEMENT WC 00 03 13 (00)-01 POLICY NUMBER. WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will nor enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. (This agreement applies only to the e1¢ent that you perform work under a wrineo contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) This agreement shall not operate directly or indirectly to benefit any one not named in the Schedule. SCHEDULE DESIGNATED PERSON: DESIGNATED ORGANIZATION: PSA without professional liability insurance(contractor) Page 16 Last Revised. 1110612012 P157 Attachment B — Sample Additional Insured for On-going Projects PSA withaa professional liability insurance(contractor) Page 17 Last Revised: 1110612012 P158 POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 10 07 04 .. THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS - SCHEDULED PERSON OR ORGANIZATION This endorsement modifies Insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Or anization s: Locations Of Covered Operations Information required to complete this Schedule.if not shorn above.will be shown in the Declarations. A. Section II —Who Is An Insured is amended to B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these include as an additional insured the person(s) or additional insureds, the following additional exdu- organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only sions apply: with respect to liability for"bodily injury'."property This insurance does not apply to"bodily injury'or damage" or "personal and advertising injury' •property damage"occurring after. caused,in whole or in part,by: 1. Your acts or omissions:or 1. All work, including materials, parts or ment furnished in connection with such work. 2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your on the project father than service,maintenance behalf or repairs)to be performed by or on behalf of in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location of the the additional insured(s) at the locations) desig- covered operations has been completed;or nated above. 2. That portion of'your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its in- tended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor en- gaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project. CG 2010 07 04 ®ISO Properties,Inc.,2004 Page 1 of 1 ❑ PSA without professional liabili1j,insurance(conlracrar) Page 18 Last Revised.: 1110612012 P159 ADDENDUM NO. 001 to Professional Services Agreement Whereas Richard Heath and Associates and the City of Rancho Cucamonga(hereinafter the"City") intend to enter into a Professional Services Agreement(hereinafter"Agreement'), and Whereas Richard Heath and Associates has identified the following exceptions to the Agreement; Section 18. Compliance with the Laws - Remove all references to Prevailing Wage as it does not apply to the Energy Efficiency Audit and Implementation Program Project described in Exhibit A, Scope of Services. Now therefore: Contractor and the City desire to incorporate the above exceptions to the attached Professional Services Agreement. Please indicate your agreement by way of signature to this Addendum No. 001 and the attached Professional Services Agreement. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than March 4, 2013 by 2:OOpm. The City will process for signature and provide Contractor with one (1) fully executed copy of the Professional Services Agreement and Addendum No. 001. Contracto Name: Richard Heath and Associates City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Ada ' 27. 17j By: N e Date Name Date C{lil✓f- �tniA(yCi14t � ICYfZ Title Title By: By: Name Date Name Date Title Title (two atures required if corpora-ti ) Approva�Suyer II, Purchasing \� Alternate, Risk Management Coordinator Last Revised: 0912812012 Page I of I P160 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP,IRTMENT Date: May 1, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TR 16227-1, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for TR 16227-1, located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Meritage Homes of California, Inc BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Meritage Homes of California, Inc 1250 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 210 Corona, CA 92879 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #105788443 $138,390 Respectful) submitted, Mark A. euer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/alrw Attachment(s) P161 1 � p� •I 'I• d� d• u ,� .�.._7 \ ,K,,.. �,a.. .roPr�-1� 0 ,c �I ,//• .\ I ° ���',� �� �° '' 1� �-:rte, a°I"I a •I :1 I o � � r- ,1 n jx W -FFr I 1 m -M EH � o _ � J - o L) z �F I E w d ! r u. C) w TQ_ICI �J 1� � 1 J >1 z v P162 STAFF REPORT - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jason C. Welday, Traffic Engineer C&3 Subject: APPROVAL OF UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 22727 WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES RELATED TO THE INTERSTATE 15 AT BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve Utility Agreement No. 22727 with Southern California Edison (SCE) and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In November 2005, the voters of San Bernardino County approved Measure 1 2010-2040 a 30-year extension of the original Measure I half-cent sales tax increment approved in April 1990. As part of the planning process for Measure 1 2010-2040, SANBAG along with member agencies prepared a Nexus Study to identify regional transportation projects that could be funded with revenues generated by the measure. The Nexus Study identified a number of interchange improvement projects within the Valley Freeway Interchange Program including the improvements needed at the Interstate 15/Base Line Road Interchange. Final design of the 1-15 at Base Line Road Interchange Improvement Project is nearing completion and construction is anticipated to begin toward the end of 2013. The project requires relocation of utility facilities owned and operated by SCE. The attached Utility Agreement has been prepared in accordance with Caltrans' policies for relocation of utilities where the liability for the relocation is in part or in whole the responsibility of the local agency. Liability for relocations needed for modifications to freeway facilities is determined based on the Master Agreement between Caltrans and SCE dated December 20, 1960. The City's costs under the attached agreement (50% of the total relocation costs) have been estimated by SCE at $215,000. The final cost to the City will be based on 50% of the actual costs for SCE for the relocation. These costs are eligible expenses for reimbursement by SANBAG and the City of Fontana under Measure I at a rate of 50% and 16.5% respectively. In order for the City to receive Right of Way Certification for the project, the Utility Agreement must be fully executed by the City and SCE. At this time, SCE is declining to enter into Utility Agreements with Caltrans as well as local agencies based on the recent inclusion of the Buy America clause. The Buy America clause was added by Caltrans in order to comply with MAP-21. SCE and Caltrans are currently in discussions regarding this matter. In order to help cities meet certain funding deadlines, Caltrans has directed local agencies to approve and execute the current form of the agreement including the Buy America language. Upon resolution of the discussions between SCE and Caltrans, revised utility agreements will be executed by both SCE and the local agencies prior to advertising for bids on the project. It is therefore recommended that the City P163 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: SCE Utility Agreement May 1, 2013 Page 2 Council approve the agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute it in both its current and final form as approved by Caltrans. Should the final form contain modifications that are not conforming to the intent of the attached agreement, staff will bring the final agreement before the City Council at a later meeting for further action. The agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney's office. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. euer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/J CW:Is Attachments: Exhibit"A"— Utility Agreement No. 22727 P164 Dist Co. Rte KP (P.M.) EA 8 SBd 15 P.M. 497101 R6.3/7.1 Fed. Aid No: N/A CVWD's File: FEDERAL On the PARTICIPATION: Project [X] Yes [ ] No On the [ ] Yes [X] No Utilities UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 22727 DATE: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter called "CITY," proposes to reconstruct an existing interchange at Base Line Road and Interstate 15 in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana and Southern California Edison, hereinafter called "OWNER," owns and maintains underground electrical lines within the limits of CITY's project which require relocation during construction of the interchange to accommodate CITY's project. It is hereby mutually agreed that: I. Work to Be Done: In accordance with Notice to Owner No. 22727 dated OWNER shall relocate existing electrical facilities in conflict with the proposed project. All work shall be performed substantially in accordance with OWNER's Plan No. dated consisting of sheets, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Engineer of the City of Rancho at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Deviations from the OWNER's plan described above initiated by either the CITY or the OWNER, shall be agreed upon by both parties hereto under a Revised Notice to Owner. Such Revised Notices to Owner, approved by the CITY and agreed to/acknowledged by the OWNER, will constitute an approved revision of the OWNER's plan described above and are hereby made a part hereof. No work under said deviation shall commence prior to written execution by the OWNER of the Revised Notice to Owner. Changes in the scope of the work will require an amendment to this Agreement in addition to the revised Notice to Owner. II. Liability for Work: The existing facilities described in Section I above will be relocated at 50% CITY expense and 50% OWNER expense in accordance with Section 7 of the Master Agreement dated December 21, 1960, III. Performance of Work: OWNER agrees to perform the herein described work with its own forces or to cause the herein described work to be performed by the OWNER's contractor, employed by written contract on a continuing basis to perform work of this type, and to provide and furnish all necessary labor, materials, tools, and equipment required therefore, and to prosecute said work diligently to completion. P165 IV. Payment for Work: The CITY shall pay its share of the actual and necessary cost of the herein described work within 90 days after receipt of five (5) copies of OWNER's itemized bill, signed by a responsible official of OWNER's organization and prepared on OWNER's letterhead, compiled on the basis of the actual and necessary cost and expense incurred and charged or allocated to said work in accordance with the uniform system of accounts prescribed for OWNER by the California Public Utilities Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or Federal Communications Commission, whichever is applicable. It is understood and agreed that the CITY will not pay for any betterment or increase in capacity of OWNER's facilities in the new location and that OWNER shall give credit to the CITY for the "used life" or accumulated depreciation of the replaced facilities and for the salvage value of any material or parts salvaged and retained or sold by OWNER. Not more frequently than once a month, but at least quarterly, OWNER will prepare and submit progress bills for costs incurred not to exceed OWNER's recorded costs as of the hilling date less estimated credits applicable to completed work. Payment of progress bills not to exceed the amount of this Agreement may be made under the terms of this Agreement. Payment of progress bills which exceed the amount of this Agreement may be made after receipt and approval by CITY of documentation supporting the cost increase and after an Amendment to this agreement has been executed by the parties to this Agreement. The OWNER shall submit a final bill to the CITY within 360 days after the completion of the work described in Section I above. If the CITY has not received a final bill within 360 days after notification of completion of OWNER's work described in Section I of this Agreement, and CITY has delivered to OWNER fully executed Director's Deeds, Consents to Common Use or Joint Use Agreements as required for OWNER's facilities, CITY will provide written notification to OWNER of its intent to close its file within 30 days and OWNER hereby acknowledges, to the extent allowed by law, that all remaining costs will be deemed to have been abandoned. If the CITY processes a final bill for payment more than 360 days after notification of completion of OWNER's work, payment of the late bill may be subject to allocation and/or approval by the California Transportation Commission. The final billing shall be in the form of an itemized statement of the total costs charged to the project, less the credits provided for in this Agreement, and less any amounts covered by progress billings. However, the CITY shall not pay final bills which exceed the estimated cost of this Agreement without documentation of the reason for the increase of said cost from the OWNER and approval of documentation by CITY. Except, if the final bill exceeds the OWNER's estimated costs solely as the result of a revised Notice to Owner as provided for in Section I, a copy of said revised Notice to Owner shall suffice as documentation. In either case, payment of the amount over the estimated cost of this Agreement may be subject to allocation and/or approval by the California Transportation Commission. In any event if the final bill exceeds 125% of the estimated cost of this Agreement, an Amended Agreement shall be executed by the parties to this Agreement prior to the payment of the OWNER'S final bill. Any and all increases in costs that are the direct result of deviations from the work described in Section I of this Agreement, shall have the prior concurrence of CITY. Detailed records from which the billing is compiled shall be retained by the OWNER for a period of three years from the date of the final payment and will be available for audit by State and/or Federal auditors. Owner agrees to comply with Contract Cost Principles and Procedures as set forth in 48 CFR, Chapter I, Part 31, et seq., 23 CFR, Chapter I, Part 645 and/or 18 CFR, Chapter I, Parts 101, 201, et al. If a subsequent State and/or Federal audit determines payments to be unallowable, OWNER agrees to reimburse CITY upon receipt of CITY billing. P166 IV. General Condition: OWNER shall submit a Notice of Completion to the CITY within 30 days of the completion of the work described herein. OWNER agrees to comply and to require its contractors to comply with the "Buy America" requirements set forth in the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991(ISTEA) Sections 1041(a) and 1048(a), 23 U.S.C. 313 and 23 C.F.R. Part 635.410, which are incorporated into this Agreement by reference, and which require that all steel and iron products, and their coatings, used in FHWA-funded projects are produced in the United States, Unless a waiver has been granted by FHWA or the product is subject to a general waiver. This cost estimate has been calculated and presented without an Income Tax Component of Contribution (ITCC). In the event that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), state, city, and/or local governmental taxing authority determines that this project is taxable, the City will reimburse SCE for 50% of the amount of the tax liability, plus interest, penalties, fees, and related costs. Such amounts will be paid to SCE within 60 days after notification of such event by SCE to the City. By execution of this document, City hereby acknowledges that this project is funded by Local, Federal, and State funds. THE ESTIMATED COST TO CITY FOR ITS SHARE OF THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED WORK IS $215,000.00 CERTIFICATION OF FUNDS FUND TYPE EA AMOUNT I hereby certify upon my own personal knowledge Design Funds $ that budgeted funds are available for the period Construction $ and purpose of the expenditure shown here. Funds RW Funds $ HQ Accountin g Officer Date ITEM CHAP I STAT I FY I AMOUNT P167 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Page 4 of 4 UTILITY AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above parties have executed this Agreement the day and year above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON: By: By: John R. Gillison Date Date City Manager APPROVAL RECOMMENDED By: yzy � rk A. Stg4r Date Brian Smith Date Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Consultant Utility Coordinator P168 STAFF REPORT - ADMINISTRATIVF_SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 C,,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer Ruth Cain, CPPB, Buyer II Subject: AUTHORIZE AN INCREASE IN ANNUAL EXPENDITURES FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF BATTERIES FROM INTERSTATE BATTERY OF ALTA LOMA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize an increase in annual expenditures for the procurement of batteries by various departments from Interstate Battery of Alta Loma, California for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2012/2013 in the amount of $14,100 to be funded from account numbers 3281527-5250 (Vehicle Operations & Maint) $7,440; 3282527-5250 (CFD 85-1 Vehicle Operations & Maint) $3,660; and 1001317-5250 (Vehicle & Equipment Maint.) $3,000; authorization to continue to purchase from Interstate Battery on an as needed basis through Fiscal Year 2013/2014. BACKGROUND/ANAYLSIS City Departments and the Fire District purchase batteries from Interstate Battery on an as needed basis. Current year-to-date expenditures to Interstate Battery total $45,760 and additional expenditures are expected through June 2013. In accordance with the City's purchasing policy, expenditures of $50,000 and over to one vendor require City Council approval. In addition to Council authorizing an increase for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2012/2013, staff also recommends authorization to continue to purchase from Interstate Battery on an as needed basis through Fiscal Year 2013/2014. Prior to December 2013, the Purchasing Division will conduct a formal bid process and award a multi-year contract for the purchase of batteries on an as needed basis for all city departments to utilize. P169 STAFF REPORT - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineer (jj Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS' FOR THE DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BE FUNDED FROM SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL AND BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Deer Creek Channel Bike Trail project, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The proposed project will construct a Class I Bike Trail along the west side of Deer Creek Channel from the Pacific Electric Trail to Highland Avenue and upgrade the existing maintenance/access road that runs along the east side of the Deer Creek Channel from Base Line Road to Highland Avenue within the San Bernardino County Flood Control District right of way. Class I Bike Trail improvements include an asphalt paved pathway with signage and striping. The Engineer's estimate is $245,000, including 10% contingency and costs for inspection, surveying, materials testing and construction support. This construction project is a 100% federally funded Safe Routes to School Program, project number STRSL5420 (016), with City Beautification Funds for construction support. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has prepared the NEPA environmental determination (Categorical Exclusion) for the proposed project. Legal advertising is scheduled for May 7, 2013 and May 14, 2013 with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 4, 2013, unless extended by addenda. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/CB:ls Attachment P170 PROJECT LOCATION jH[H,LLs, RD W ❑❑ ❑ WLSON VE I WILSON AVE N ANYAN ST I❑0 a 0/1 F-m BANYAN ST —� LEMON T= F ❑ 6U E7 ¢ W BANYAN ST r:— w HIGHLAND VE Y 19TH ST �J� J w .J 1 NCTORIA 1NEET / Z m F VICTORIA AR }¢ a < BASE LINE R CHURCH S7r D r' FOOTHILL BLVD 6'6 f— ^ l ¢ ARROW ROUTE a 0I 01 w �r a Z o: ° N <�..I Z ¢. m =1[ �� W 3 W ckf Z W _ 5 � _ ¢ 6TH ST CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROPOSED DEER CREEK TRAIL BETWEEN BASE LINE RD. AND HIGHLAND AVE. N LOCATION MAP N.T.S. P171 RESOLUTION NO. 13-056 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO HIGHLAND AVENUE", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO HIGHLAND AVENUE". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 4, 2013, sealed bids or proposals for the "DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO HIGHLAND AVENUE" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO HIGHLAND AVENUE". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1,Articles 1 and 2,the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of Resolution No. 13-056 - Page 1 of 4 P172 the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer,workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by thejoint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1130 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjourneymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight(8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Resolution No. 13-056— Page 2 of 4 P173 Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00)for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers'check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class"A"License(General Engineering Contractor)or Specialty Class "C-12" License in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.)and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the"California Business and Professions Code,"Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. In an effort to go green and paperless, digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal, including any future addenda or revisions to the bid documents, are available by going to www.ciplist.com and signing up, by going to Member Login or Member Signup (it's free), then choose California,then scroll down to San Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities,then scroll down to Rancho Cucamonga and click on City Projects, then click on the Project of interest under the Title and follow directions for download. Note, copies of the plans, specifications, bid proposal, Resolution No. 13-056 — Page 3 of 4 P174 addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from the above website then printed. Prospective bidders must register for an account on www.ciplist.com to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s)and to receive email updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained on this site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to the bid documents, it is the responsibility of each prospective bidder to registerwith www.ciplist.com and to check this website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to registered prospective bidders from www.ciplist.com. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for"DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO HIGHLAND AVENUE" may be directed to: CURT BILLINGS, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER & PROJECT MANAGER 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2740, ext. 4069 ADVERTISE ON: May 7, 2013 and May 14, 2013 Resolution No. 13-056 — Page 4 of 4 P175 STAFF REPORT - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Subject: APPROVAL OF AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 APPROPRIATIONS RECOMMENDATION It is requested that the City Council approve the attached Fiscal Year 2012/13 budgetary adjustments for all City funds. BACKGROUND When the budget development process begins, staff is actually projecting estimated appropriations fourteen to sixteen months ahead of anticipated needs. In general, the attached schedules adjust estimated expenditures to reflect a more current snapshot in all funds. Funding for items included in the adopted budget are increased or decreased to reflect more recent experience. Adjustments have been made for the reallocation of resources when a particular line item has not been fully expended and is utilized for another area of operations within a department's budget. Also included in the adjusted figures are two additional items: 1) funding for purchase orders that were originally budgeted but were carried over from fiscal year 2011/12; and 2) funding for various expenditures approved by the City Council during the course of the current fiscal year. Carryover Purchase Orders. At the end of each fiscal year, there are a varying number of financial commitments outstanding, due primarily to timing issues, which are recorded in the City's financial records as purchase orders. A portion of the City's reserves is procedurally set aside each year for funding these commitments in the subsequent fiscal year. Although the initial budget appropriation for these purchase orders was approved in the prior fiscal year, the outstanding commitment carries over into the current fiscal year and must be funded in the current year's Amended Budget out of reserves. Generally, these outstanding commitments are for capital projects or contract services that are completed subsequent to the fiscal year in which they were approved. Total carryover purchase orders for the City's General Fund amounted to approximately $287,050. City Council Approved Changes. During the course of any fiscal year, the City Council approves appropriation changes for items not anticipated during the budget preparation process, including emergency repairs. Annually, the City Council (Council) adopts the amended appropriations. There has been no shift of estimated expenditures which deviates from the direction the Council has requested of staff. Capital improvement programs, as they are addressed, are approved as separate Council items throughout the year. P176 APPROVAL OF AMENDED FISCAL.YEAR 2012/13 APPROPRIATIONS PAGE 2 MAY 1,2013 The attached schedules submitted for your review indicate the prior year's budgeted revenues and expenditures, the current year's (2012/13) adopted budget amounts, and the 2012/13 amended budget amounts in each account area. Respectfully submitted, Tamara L. Layne Finance Director Attachments P177 City of Rancho Cucamonga Amended Fiscal Year . 2012/ 13 Budget A 160A Its* REVENUES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P178 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES SUMMARY BY ENTITY,FUND 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Fund/Description Budget Budget Budget 001 GENERAL FUND 63,103,030 63,414,270 65,516,080 003 REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT 38,840 38,840 55,050 006 CV WD REIMBURSEMENTS 246,880 250,000 287,000 008 CNTY OF S. B. REIMBURSEMENTS 86,680 93,880 93,880 016 COMM DEV TECHNICAL SRVCS FUND 171,980 482,010 474,340 017 LAW ENFORCEMENT RESERVE 330,090 514,950 57,280 018 TRAFFIC SAFETY 404,000 358,200 358,200 019 INFO TECHNOLOGY-DEVELOPMENT 196,860 196,860 196,860 020 CITY TECHNOLOGY FEE FUND 0 0 69,410 022 MOBILE HOME PARK PROGRAM 11,780 11,910 12,180 023 SB1186 CERT ACCESS SPEC PROG 0 0 2,790 025 CAPITAL RESERVE 2,191,490 1,909,790 3,312,570 073 BENEFITS CONTINGENCY 463,270 613,010 613,010 100 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADMIN 920,640 1,109,880 1,124,780 101 AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER 160 130 100 105 AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 661,610 314,090 622,080 110 BEAUTIFICATION 94,480 80,700 280,700 112 DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL 2,005,580 415,680 1,788,590 114 DRAINAGE-ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAfNE 495,000 33,540 604,560 116 ETIWANDA DRAINAGE - 111,730 101,550 228,850 118 UPPER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE 8,960 7,050 5,880 120 PARK DEVELOPMENT 1,282,740 601,750 893,750 122 SOUTH ETIWANDA DRAINAGE 2,750 4,490 3,360 124 TRANSPORTATION 4,932,620 3,047,590 5,427,100 126 LOWER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE 50,000 6,700 35,830 128 ETIWANDA NO. EQUESTRIAN FACIL. 0 0 632,000 129 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES 1,305,780 1,385,740 111,810 130 LMD#1 GENERAL CITY 1,448,840 1,449,110 1,519,880 131 LMD 42 VICTORIA 3,028,890 3,102,300 3,207,910 132 LMD 43A HYSSOP 4,840 8,030 8,430 133 LMD#3B MEDIANS 1,372,220 1,336,830 1,407,930 134 LMD#4R TERRA VISTA 2,419,000 2,962,500 2,989,420 135 LMD#5 TOT LOT 6,050 14,320 5,920 136 LMD#6R CARYN COMMUNITY 450,850 448,860 442,080 137 LMD 97 NORTH ETIWANDA 939,630 1,017,000 1,032,090 138 LMD#8 SOUTH ETIWANDA 28,990 30,080 28,960 139 LMD#9 LOWER ETIWANDA 698,360 721,770 692,250 140 LMD#10 RANCHO ETIWANDA 547,920 641,100 654,590 150 GENERAL CITY STREET LIGHTS 1,140 900 740 151 SLD#1 ARTERIAL 1,090,340 849,610 788,000 152 SLD 42 RESIDENTIAL 332,000 331,810 342,060 153 SLD#3 VICTORIA 427,230 347,340 356,040 154 SLD#4 TERRA VISTA 227,450 176,700 195,580 155 SLD 95 CARYN COMMUNITY 82,810 66,420 63,530 156 SLD#6 INDUSTRIAL AREA 163,380 131,260 130,210 157 SLD#7 NORTH ETIWANDA 308,340 216,400 203,560 158 SLD#8 SOUTH ETIWANDA 165,550 160,720 158,530 . 170 GAS TAX 2105/PROPI 11 960,760 1,100,570 1,218,790 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P179 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES SUMMARY BY ENTITY,FUND 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Fund/Description Budget Budget Budget 172 GAS TAX 2106-2107 2,079,810 2,136,520 2,015,770 174 GAS TAX R&T7360 1,988,570 1,969,100 1,981,990 176 MEASURE] 1990-20 10 672,000 32,320 365,770 177 MEASURE 12010-2040 2,192,110 3,373,900 2,854,380 180 SB 325 10 0 0 186 FOOTHILL BLVD MAINTENANCE 73,590 33,220 33,220 188 INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT 1,148,610 1,092,180 2,122,760 190 PROP 42-TRAFFIC CONGESTION MIT 733,700 697,370 1,365,270 194 PROPOSITION 1B STATE FUNDING 7,670 125,730 2,590 195 STATE ASSET SEIZURE 0 165,900 165,900 196 CA ASSET SEIZURE 15% 0 10,250 10,250 197 FEDERAL ASSET SEIZURE 1,700 1,550 1,570 198 CITYWIDE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPRV 3,765,680 2,583,410 6,865,010 204 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK GRNT 2,031,730 1,034,580 1,034,580 214 PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3 0 215,960 215,880 215 ENRGY EFFICNCY/CONSRVATN GRNT 18,480 18,480 18,480 218 PUBLIC RESRCE GRNTS/HEALTHY RC 129,370 157,890 288,810 225 CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT 22,000 44,020 45,470 226 USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT 20,900 0 0 227 USED OIL RECYCLING PROGRAM 0 49,260 59,260 234 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM 114,800 478,780 770,390 235 PROP 84 PARK BOND ACT 0 283,500 0 250 RECREATION SERVICES 4,707,680 4,790,740 4,571,750 258 SENIOR OUTREACH GRANT 7,500 0 6,920 290 LIBRARY FUND 3,974,210 3,924,980 3,962,600 291 CA STATE LIBRARY 127,980 6,610 46,420 292 STAFF INNOVATION FD(CA ST LB) 0 16,350 167,090 298 CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN 105,250 0 0 301 THE BIG READ LIBRARY GRANT 0 15,000 15,000 302 LIBRARY SERVICES&TECH.ACT 0 3,000 12,000 354 COP'S PROGRAM GRANT-STATE 400,000 401,200 401,200 356 JUSTICE ASSIST GRNT(JAG)ARRA 2,340 1,870 341,950 361 JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT(JAG) 40,000 40,000 53,070 373 COPS SECURE OUR SCHOOLS GRANT 260,860 18,000 50,440 374 COPS HIRING PROGRAM GRANT 0 0 102,460 380 DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT 37,940 37,940 104,350 381 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 2005 0 0 124,360 600 AD 82-1 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL 210 170 140 602 AD 84-1 DAY CREEK/MELLO 18,330 14,430 12,030 607 CFD 2000-01 SOUTH ETIWANDA 20 10 10 608 CFD 2000-02 RC CORPORATE PARK 60 60 60 610 CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT 1,200 1,200 1,200 612 CFD 2001-01 8,100 6,370 5,310 614 CFD 2003-01 PROJECT FUND 100 100 100 615 CFD 2003-01 CULTURAL CENTER 130 130 130 617 CFD 2004-01 RANCHO ETIWANDA ES 500,000 500,000 500,000 680 CFD 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE 100,000 100,000 100,000 681 CFD 2006-02 AMADOR ON ROUTE 66 220 200 180 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P180 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES SUMMARY BY ENTITY,FUND 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Fund/Description Budget Budget Budget 700 SPORTS COMPLEX 1,890,400 1,900,320 1,891,860 705 MUNICIPAL UTILITY 11,186,070 11,209,400 11,119,540 706 UTILITY PUBLIC BENEFIT FUND 514,910 524,560 449,660 708 RCMU CAPITAL REPLACEMENT FUND 0 0 10,080 712 EQUIPNEHICLE REPLACEMENT 794,550 718,810 681,290 714 COMP EQUIP/TECH REPLCMENT FUND 1,173,230 1,191,600 1,665,420 805 CFD 84-1 REDEMPTION FUND 750 750 750 812 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND DEBT 286,890 295,040 300,840 813 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND IMPR 500,000 50,230 50,230 815 CFD 88-2 POLICE 860 830 820 820 CFD 2004-01 REDEMPTION 3,214,650 2,967,820 3,080,830 821 CFD 2004-01 RESERVE 310 310 0 838 AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON 46,980 51,570 51,570 841 AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER 251,300 250,110 250,050 842 CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE 428,510 402,570 429,850 848 PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND 1,661,230 1,671,600 1,808,460 850 PD 85 RESERVE FUND 100 80 60 852 CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RDMPTN 125,190 106,110 113,960 853 CFD 2000-01 SO ETI WANDA RSRV 70 10 0 854 AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION 328,080 319,570 319,570 855 AD 1999-1 REFUNDING RESERVE 8,400 1,350 0 856 CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK ROMP 594,460 922,390 944,040 857 CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RSRV 390 380 0 858 CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT RDMP 711,150 731,630 765,020 859 CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT RSRV 410 90 0 860 CFD 2001-01 SERIES A REDMPTION 1,264,200 837,890 837,890 861 CFD 2001-01 SERIES A RESERVE 670 180 640 862 CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION 93,250 68,270 56,060 863 CFD 200 1-01 SERIES B RESERVE 50 10 0 864 CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN 1,067,860 1,072,000 1,094,420 865 CFD 2003-01 SERIES A RESERVE 830 180 0 866 CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN 205,800 206,720 214,890 867 CFD 2003-01 SERIES B RESERVE 170 40 0 868 CFD 2000-03 PARK MAINTENANCE 388,800 465,690 465,890 869 CFD 2006-01 REDEMPTION 407,360 450,560 457,180 870 CFD 2006-01 RESERVE 40 40 0 871 CFD 2006-02 REDEMPTION 229,420 247,920 253,150 872 CFD 2006-02 RESERVE 20 20 0 Total for CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: 146,491,760 141,155,170 156,364,680 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P181 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget GENERAL FUND(001) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 3,235,560 3,107,650 3,113,860 4102-Property Taxes-CY Unsecured 142,970 141,390 142,070 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec& Unsec 112,850 108,000 111,730 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 142,720 140,320 170,800 4105 -Property Taxes-Supplemental 100,260 100,260 76,690 4106-Property Taxes-Unitary 188,090 280,450 295,600 4107-Property Transfer Tax 540,880 515,000 803,990 4111 -Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF 14,356,550 14,249,310 14,354,650 4112-Property Tax- Post RDA 0 772,190 787,570 4120-Sales and Use Tax 16,557,560 17,869,530 19,000,330 4121 -Prop 172-Half Cent Sales Tax 381,060 409,260 421,740 4122-Sales Tax In-Lieu(Triple Flp) 5,519,190 5,956,510 6,870,670 4125 -Transient Occupancy Tax 1,750,790 1,843,160 2,120,180 4126-Admissions Tax 0 0 78,860 4130-Franchise Fee-Gas& Electric 2,453,090 2,400,000 2,432,620 4131 -Franchise Fee-Resid. Refuse 933,830 933,830 927,770 4132-Franchise Fee-Comm. Refuse 1,117,020 1,150,240 1,211,160 4133 -Franchise Fee-Cable 1,221,090 1,281,010 1,307,030 4201 -Business Licenses 2,204,840 2,251,140 2,140,000 4202-Bicycle License 40 0 0 4207-Building Permits 1,020,000 874,290 874,290 4209-Mobile Home Permit 920 2,800 3,680 4210-Bldg Permits-SB1473(90%to CA) 870 330 550 4215 -Animal Licenses 215,000 270,000 265,000 4220-Other Licenses&Permits 42,390 18,420 22,330 4301 -Vehicle Code Fines 196,820 242,620 125,980 4302- Parking Citations 142,170 142,170 163,560 4306-Vehicle Release Fees 171,980 171,980 169,130 4307-Citation Proof of Corr Fees 3,840 1,790 3,170 4308-General Ordinance Fines 54,640 44,930 38,410 4309-False Alarm Fees 14,500 9,600 4,070 4310- Loud Party Ordinance Fines 1,600 800 400 4313-Other Fines& Forfeitures 56,830 48,660 154,600 4401 -Interest Earnings 821,050 757,320 626,560 4419-Other Rental/Lease Income 133,840 125,340 54,730 4440-Sale of Fixed Assets 67,790 60,340 22,550 4501 - Plan Check Fees 920,050 782,250 782,250 4507- Building& Safety-Special Sery 20,000 0 0 4508-Planning Fees 600,000 575,000 575,000 4509-Planning- Special Services Fee 440,000 440,000 440,000 4510- Engineering Fees 750,000 600,000 600,000 4511 - Engineering-Special Services 80,000 80,000 50,000 4560- Fingerprint Fees 31,370 30,970 27,380 4563 -Candidates Filing Fees 0 30,000 9,830 4564- Returned Item Charge 400 600 250 4565 -Passport Processing Fees 10,000 0 200 4567-Passport Photo Fees 3,500 0 110 4570- Sale of Printed Materials 25,000 17,260 17,100 4630-Animal Adoption Fees 150,000 125,000 125,000 4631 -Animal Spay/Neuter Fees 500 500 1,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P182 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 4633 -Animal Boarding Fees 9,000 9,000 9,000 4634-Animal Impound Fees 25,000 20,000 24,000 4636-Owner Surrender Fees 13,000 13,000 13,000 4637-Animal Pick-Up Fee 4,000 4,000 5,000 4638-Microchipping Fee 4,000 4,000 4,000 4701 -Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Fees 663,730 90,000 91,710 4710-Homeowners Property Tax Relief 74,650 75,140 75,960 4740-Grant Income 0 0 31,130 4901 -Other Revenue 763,620 725,280 581,800 4905 -Contributions/Fund Raising 35,000 101,980 101,980 4911 -Reimbursement from Other Funds 2,811,270 113,730 109,970 4914-Non-Abated Reimbursements 62,260 117,940 142,450 4917-RDASA Admin Allowance 0 1,369,310 1,363,040 8017-Transfer In-Law Enforcment Rsv 199,660 357,670 0 8025 -Transfer In-Capital Rsry Fund 382,760 398,990 398,990 8073 -Transfer In-Fund 073 144,750 46,380 33,970 8705-Transfer In-Municipal Utility 942,400 942,400 942,400 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 34,480 63,230 63,230 Total For Fund 001: 63,103,030 63,414,270 65,516,080 REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT(003) 4303 -Parking Cit Surcharge-State 15,540 15,540 12,930 4304-Parking CitSurchrge-County 11,650 11,650 0 4305 -Parking Cit Surcharge-Cnty Crt 11,650 11,650 16,900 4901 -Other Revenue 0 0 25,220 Total For Fund 003: 38,840 38,840 55,050 CVWD REIMBURSEMENTS(006) 4745-Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 246,880 250,000 287,000 Total For Fund 006: 246,880 250,000 287,000 CNTY OF S. B.REIMBURSEMENTS(008) 4745-Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 86,680 86,680 86,680 4914-Non-Abated Reimbursements 0 2,400 2,400 8001 -Transfer In-General Fund 0 4,800 4,800 Total For Fund 008: 86,680 93,880 93,880. COMM DEV TECHNICAL SRVCS FUND(016) 4401 -Interest Earnings 26,210 17,470 12,230 4518 -General Plan Update Fee 25,220 23,400 23,400 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 120,550 441,140 438,710 Total For Fund 016: 171,980 482,010 474,340 LAW ENFORCEMENT RESERVE(017) 4401 -Interest Earnings 0 19,250 15,930 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P183 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget. Budget 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 330,090 495,700 41,350 Total For Fund 017: 330,090 514,950 57,280 TRAFFIC SAFETY(018) 4301 - Vehicle Code Fines 404,000 358,200 358,200 Total For Fund 018: 404,000 358,200 358,200 INFO TECHNOLOGY-DEVELOPMENT(019) 4401 -Interest Earnings 5,610 3,160 5,490 4519-Information Technology Revenue 129,400 120,060 120,060 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 61,850 73,640 71,310 Total For Fund 019: 196,860 196,860 196,860 CITY TECHNOLOGY FEE FUND(020) 4517-Technology Fee-Permit 0 0 69,410 Total For Fund 020: 0 0 69,410 MOBILE HOME PARK PROGRAM(022) 4218-Mobile Home Lot Fees-City 8,140 8,140 8,140 4219-Mobile Home Lot Fees-State 3,150 3,150 3,150 4401 - Interest Earnings 490 620 890 Total For Fund 022: 11,780 11,910 12,180 SB1186 CERT ACCESS SPEC PROG (023) 4650-SB1186 Cert Access Spec Prog 0 0 2,790 Total For Fund 023: 0 0 2,790 CAPITAL RESERVE(025) 4401 -Interest Earnings 0 85,570 75,490 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 2,191,490 1,824,220 3,237,080 Total For Fund 025: 2,191,490 1,909,790 3,312,570. BENEFITS CONTINGENCY(073) 4401 -Interest Earnings 86,700 65,210 40,300 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 376,570 547,800 572,710 Total For Fund 073: 463,270 613,010 613,010 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADM IN(100) 4401 - Interest Earnings 18,830 13,960 11,380 4901 -Other Revenue 901,810 915,110 1,052,450 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 180,810 60,950 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P184 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES _ 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object - Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 100: 920,640 1,109,880 1,124,780 AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER(101) 4401 - Interest Earnings 160 130 100 Total For Fund 101: 160 130 100 AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT(105) 4401 - Interest Earnings 5,080 8,850 7,260 4740-Grant Income 203,320 203,320 203,320 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 453,210 101,920 411,500 Total For Fund 105: 661,610 314,090 622,080 BEAUTIFICATION(110) 4401 - Interest Earnings 20,070 12,620 11,630 4801 - Beautification Fees 15,000 15,000 85,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 59,410 53,080 184,070 Total For Fund 110: 94,480 80,700 280,700 DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL(112) 4401 - Interest Earnings 48,950 44,610 22,690 4806-Storm Drain Fees 180,000 180,000 150,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 1,776,630 191,070 1,615,900 Total For Fund 112: 2,005,580 415,680 1,788,590 DRAINAGE-ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE(114) 4401 -Interest Earnings 5,400 7,540 8,400 4807-Secondary Regional Fee 30,000 26,000 175,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 459,600 0 421,160 Total For Fund 114: 495,000 33,540 604,560 ETIWANDA DRAINAGE(116) 4401 - Interest Earnings 29,760 21,550 18,850 4807- Secondary Regional Fee 80,000 80,000 210,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 1,970 0 0 Total For Fund 116: 111,730 101,550 228,850 UPPER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE(118) 4401 - Interest Earnings 8,960 7,050 5,880 Total For Fund 118: 8,960 7,050 5,880 PARK DEVELOPMENT(120) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P185 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 4401 -Interest Earnings 193,850 155,030 125,600 4800-Park Development Fees 89,000 89,000 89,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 999,890 357,720 679,150 Total For Fund 120: 1,282,740 601,750 893,750 SOUTH ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (122) 4401 -Interest Earnings 2,750 4,490 3,360 Total For Fund 122: 2,750 4,490 3,360 TRANSPORTATION(124) 4401 - Interest Earnings 280,300 223,510 195,330 4804-Transportation Fee/Backbone 280,000 280,000 460,000 4805-Transportation Fee/EV Preemptn 3,000 3,000 7,500 4810-Trans Fee/Arrow I-15 Int 50,000 50,000 100,000 4811 -Trans Fee/Base Line I-15 Int 33,000 33,000 75,000 4812-Trans Fee/Haven RxR Grade Sep 5,000 5,000 14,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 4,281,320 2,453,080 4,575,270 Total For Fund 124: 4,932,620 3,047,590 5,427,100 LOWER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (126) 4401 -Interest Earnings 9,040 6,700 5,280 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 40,960 0 30,550 Total For Fund 126: 50,000 6,700 35,830 ETIWANDA NO.EQUESTRIAN FACIL.(128) 8120-Transfer In-Fund 120 0 0 632,000 Total For Fund 128: 0 0 632,000 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES(129) 4401 - Interest Earnings 133,480 16,930 57,940 4813 -Underground Utilities Fee 100,000 100,000 50,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 1,072,300 1,268,810 3,870 Total For Fund 129: 1,305,780 1,385,740 111,810 LMD 0 GENERAL CITY(130) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,082,830 1,130,210 1,153,050 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec& Unsec 11,900 11,900 11,900 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 1,190 1,190 2,750 4401 -Interest Earnings 8,030 5,340 5,970 4419-Other Rental/Lease Income 15,000 15,000 15,000 4901 -Other Revenue 530 0 0 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 329,360 285,470 331,210 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P186 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 130: 1,448,840 1,449,110 1,519,880 LMD#2 VICTORIA(131) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 2,698,280 2,824,410 2,884,350 4103-Property Taxes-PY Sec& Unsec 26,980 29,610 29,610 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 2,700 2,960 6,500 4401 - Interest Earnings 24,420 23,660 24,680 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 276,510 221,660 262,770 Total For Fund 131: 3,028,890 3,102,300 3,207,910 LMD#3A HYSSOP(132) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 3,350 3,720 3,720 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 100 40 40 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 20 10 10 4401 -Interest Earnings 770 580 490 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 600 3,680 4,170 Total For Fund 132: 4,840 8,030 8,430 LMD#3B MEDIANS(133) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 909,860 923,350 974,280 4103-Property Taxes-PY Sec& Unsec 9,100 9,920 9,920 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 910 990 3,500 4401 - Interest Earnings 17,450 10,030 7,910 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 434,900 392,540 412,320 Total For Fund 133: 1,372,220 1,336,830 1,407,930 LMD#4R TERRA VISTA(134) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 2,335,760 2,471,660 2,481,340 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec& Unsec 23,360 24,980 24,980 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 2,360 2,500 3,500 4401 -Interest Earnings 17,390 22,910 28,800 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 40,130 440,450 450,800 Total For Fund 134: 2,419,000 2,962,500 2,989,420 LMD#5 TOT LOT(135) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 4,630 4,980 4,980 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 130 50 50 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 30 10 10 4401 - Interest Earnings 1,260 1,030 880 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 8,250 0 Total For Fund 135: 6,050 14,320 5,920 LMD#611 CARYN COMMUNITY(136) 4 101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 407,420 415,570 434,200 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - P187 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 4103- Property Taxes-PY Sec& Unsec 4,070 4,380 6,500 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 470 440 1,280 4401 - Interest Earnings 500 500 100 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 38,390 27,970 0 Total For Fund 136: 450,850 448,860 442,080 LMD#7 NORTH ETIWANDA(137) 4 101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 774,290 809,310 835,140 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec& Unsec 7,740 8,420 15,000 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 740 840 3,500 4401 - Interest Earnings 11,870 9,250 8,680 4419-Other Rental/Lease Income 7,500 15,000 15,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 137,490 174,180 154,770 Total For Fund 137: 939,630 1,017,000 1,032,090 LMD#8 SOUTH ETIWANDA(138) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 25,470 27,480 27,820 4103- Property Taxes-PY Sec& Unsec 2,550 290 290 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 250 30 70 4401 - Interest Earnings 720 620 780 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 1,660 0 Total For Fund 138: 28,990 30,080 28,960 LMD#9 LOWER ETIWANDA(139) 4 101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 334,790 377,650 366,190 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 7,160 3,800 7,500 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 720 380 2,250 4401 - Interest Earnings 37,830 - 34,620 29,170 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 317,860 305,320 287,140 Total For Fund 139: 698,360 721,770 692,250 LMD#10 RANCHO ETIWANDA(140) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 411,870 443,550 460,390 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 4,120 4,630 5,000 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 410 460 850 4401 -Interest Earnings 17,150 12,900 11,340 4901 -Other Revenue 200 200 200 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 114,170 179,360 176,810 Total For Fund 140: 547,920 641,100 654,590 GENERAL CITY STREET LIGHTS(150) 4401 - Interest Earnings 1,140 900 740 Total For Fund 150: 1,140 900 740 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pi 88 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget SLD#1 ARTERIAL(151) 4 101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 707,670 744,990 761,880 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 7,080 7,790 7,790 4104- Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 710 790 1,580 4401 - Interest Earnings 16,000 12,330 10,970 4808- Developer Energizing Fee 2,800 2,800 2,800 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 356,080 80,910 2,980 Total For Fund 151: 1,090,340 849,610 788,000 SLD#2 RESIDENTIAL(152) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 328,050 327,460 337,420 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 3,280 3,640 3,640 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 320 360 750 4401 -Interest Earnings 250 250 150 4808-Developer Energizing Fee 100 100 100 Total For Fund 152: 332,000 331,810 342,060 SLD#3 VICTORIA(153) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 318,200 330,040 340,280 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 3,180 3,490 3,490 4104- Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 320 350 680 4401 - Interest Earnings 16,400 13,460 11,590 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 89,130 0 0 Total For Fund 153: 427,230 347,340 356,040 SLD#4 TERRA VISTA(154) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 146,540 151,810 155,200 4103 -Property Taxes-PY.Sec&Unsec 1,470 1,570 1,570 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 140 160 500 4401 -Interest Earnings 12,300 9,540 5,560 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 67,000 13,620 32,750 Total For Fund 154: 227,450 176,700 195,580 SLD#5 CARYN COMMUNITY(155) 4 101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 40,840 41,060 42,870 4103- Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 410 440 700 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 40 40 150 4401 -Interest Earnings 1,080 590 400 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 40,440 24,290 19,410 Total For Fund 155: 82,810 66,420 63,530 SLD#6 INDUSTRIAL AREA(156) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 118,460 120,430 125,690 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 1,180 1,290 200 4104- Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 180 130 600 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P189 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 4401 - Interest Earnings 5,380 4,220 3,720 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 38,180 5,190 0 Total For Fund 156: 163,380 131,260 130,210 SLD#7 NORTH ETIWANDA(157) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 94,670 112,910 116,490 4103- Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 950 1,040 1,750 4104- Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 100 100 450 4401 - Interest Earnings 3,010 1,090 260 8174-Transfer In-Fund 174 0 0 84,610 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 209,610 101,260 0 Total For Fund 157: 308,340 216,400 203,560 SLD#8 SOUTH ETIWANDA(158) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 106,980 125,250 128,870 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 1,180 1,320 2,480 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 180 130 450 4401 -Interest Earnings 42,980 34,020 26,730 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 14,230 0 0 Total For Fund 158: 165,550 160,720 158,530 GAS TAX 2105/PROPIII (170) 4401 -Interest Earnings 17,500 19,740 18,780 4720-Gas Tax 2105-Prop I 11 943,260 864,730 804,380 4745 -Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 0 0 1,640 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 216,100 393,990 Total For Fund 170: 960,760 1,100,570 1,218,790 GAS TAX 2106-2107(172) 4401 - Interest Earnings 3,760 4,400 3,860 4721 - State Gas Tax-2106 589,070 583,170 533,130 4722- State Gas Tax-2107 1,255,290 1,241,000 1,187,870 4723 - State Gas Tax-2107.5 10,000 10,000 10,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 221,690 297,950 280,910 Total For Fund 172: 2,079,810 2,136,520 2,015,770 GAS TAX R&T7360(174) 4401 -Interest Earnings 6,290 27,160 36,520 4725 -Gas Tax R&T7360 1,982,280 1,941,940 1,945,470 Total For Fund 174: 1,988,570 1,969,100 1,981,990 MEASURE 1 1990-2010(176) 4401 -Interest Earnings 61,530 32,320 20,550 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 610,470 0 345,220 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P190 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 176: 672,000 32,320 365,770 MEASURE 12010-2040(177) 4401 -Interest Earnings 6,580 23,310 39,250 4715- Measure I Local St Allotment 2,183,730 2,211,910 2,286,440 4901 -Other Revenue 0 0 7,650 4914-Non-Abated Reimbursements 0 0 29,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 1,800 1,138,680 492,040 Total For Fund 177: 2,192,110 3,373,900 2,854,380 SB 325(180) 4401 -Interest Earnings 10 0 0 Total For Fund 180: 10 0 0 FOOTHILL BLVD MAINTENANCE(186) 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 73,590 33,220 33,220 Total For Fund 186: 73,590 33,220 33,220 INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT(188) 4134-Integrated Waste Mgmt Fee 1,033,320 1,033,320 1,091,290 4401 -Interest Earnings 60,470 43,860 24,320 4590-Administrative Fee-C&D Program 15,000 15,000 15,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 39,820 0 992,150 Total For Fund 188: 1,148,610 1,092,180 2,122,760 PROP 42-TRAFFIC CONGESTION MIT(190) 4401 -Interest Earnings 34,640 24,670 14,490 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 699,060 672,700 1,350,780 Total For Fund 190: 733,700 697,370 1,365,270 BICYCLE TRANSPORT ACCT GRANT(192) PROPOSITION 1 B STATE FUNDING(194) 4401 -Interest Earnings 7,670 2,340 2,590 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 123,390 0 Total For Fund 194: 7,670 125,730 2,590 STATE ASSET SEIZURE(195) 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 165,900 165,900 Total For Fund 195: 0 165,900 165,900 CA ASSET SEIZURE 15%(196) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P191 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 10,250 10,250 Total For Fund 196: 0 10,250 10,250 FEDERAL ASSET SEIZURE(197) 4401 -Interest Earnings 1,700 1,550 1,570 Total For Fund 197: 1,700 1,550 1,570 CITYWIDE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPRV(198) 4401 -Interest Earnings 65,680 83,410 63,060 4745-Other Intergov't1 Reimbursemnt 3,700,000 2,500,000 1,003,000 4901 -Other Revenue 0 0 64,800 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 5,734,150 Total For Fund 198: 3,765,680 2,583,410 6,865,010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK GRNT(204) 4740-Grant Income 1,941,730 1,034,580 1,034,580 4741 -Program Income 90,000 0 0 Total For Fund 204: 2,031,730 1,034,580 1,034,580 PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3(214) 4740-Grant Income 0 215,870 215,880 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 90 0 Total For Fund 214: 0 215,960 215,880 ENRGY EFFICNCY/CONSRVATN GRNT(215) 4740-Grant Income 18,480 18,480 18,480 Total For Fund 215: 18,480 18,480 18,480 PROP 108 PASSENGER RAIL BOND(216) PUBLIC RESRCE GRNTS/HEALTHY RC(218) 4905 -Contributions/Fund Raising 90,000 90,000 210,620 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 39,370 67,890 78,190 Total For Fund 218: 129,370 157,890 288,810 CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT(225) 4740-Grant Income 0 44,020 44,590 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 22,000 0 880 Total For Fund 225: 22,000 44,020 45,470 USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT(226) 4740-Grant Income 20,900 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P192 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 226: 20,900 0 0 USED OIL RECYCLING PROGRAM(227) 4740-Grant Income 0 49,260 39,260 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 20,000 Total For Fund 227: 0 49,260 59,260 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM (234) 4740-Grant Income 0 316,790 770,390 8999-Transfer in From Fund Balance 1 14,800 161,990 0 Total For Fund 234: 114,800 478,780 770,390 PROP 84 PARK BOND ACT(235) 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 283,500 0 Total For Fund 235: 0 283,500 0 RECREATION SERVICES(250) 4401 - Interest Earnings 26,140 20,920 21,930 4419-Other Rental/Lease Income 911,580 975,970 862,410 4520- Recreation Fees 2,215,080 2,305,850 2,268,610 4522- Processing Fees 50,530 56,650 61,270 4571 - Sale of Taxable Items 10,380 10,380 22,500 4581 -Ticket Sales 696,370 620,640 584,090 4586-Advertising Revenue 15,000 9,000 9,530 4901 -Other Revenue 117,110 116,520 123,430 4905-Contributions/Fund Raising 474,750 345,110 357,720 4914-Non-Abated Reimbursements 12,220 12,220 8,120 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 178,520 317,480 252,140 Total For Fund 250: 4,707,680 4,790,740 4,571,750 SENIOR OUTREACH GRANT(258) 4740-Grant Income 7,500 0 6,920 Total For Fund 258: 7,500 0 6,920 LIBRARY FUND(290) 4 101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 3,031,060 2,918,780 2,962,340 4102-Property Taxes-CY Unsecured 79,020 77,090 77,990 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec& Unsec 61,850 58,890 61,330 4105 -Property Taxes-Supplemental 54,340 53,970 42,100 4112- Property Tax- Post RDA 0 133,810 136,480 4312- Library Fines and Fees 175,000 175,000 175,000 4401 - Interest Earnings 91,970 67,290 61,620 4410-Media Rentals 120,000 120,000 120,000 4515 - Information Service Fees 300 500 800 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P193 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES , 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 4565 -Passport Processing Fees 30,000 60,000 46,000 4567-Passport Photo Fees 7,200 15,000 8,000 4570-Sale of Printed Materials 18,000 18,000 18,000 4907-Private Contributions Library 125,000 130,000 130,000 4909-RC Library Foundation Support 0 10,000 10,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 180,470 86,650 112,940 Total For Fund 290: 3,974,210 3,924,980 3,962,600 CA STATE LIBRARY(291) 4740-Grant Income 0 0 31,810 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 127,980 6,610 14,610 Total For Fund 291: 127,980 6,610 46,420 STAFF INNOVATION FD(CA ST LB)(292) 4740-Grant Income 0 0 167,090 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 16,350 0 Total For Fund 292: 0 16,350 167,090 CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN(298) 4909- RC Library Foundation Support 15,000 0 0 8290-Transfer In-Library Fund 83,000 0 0 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 7,250 0 0 Total For Fund 298: 105,250 0 0 THE BIG READ LIBRARY GRANT(301) 4740-Grant Income 0 15,000 15,000 Total For Fund 301: 0 15,000 15,000 LIBRARY SERVICES&TECH.ACT(302) 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 3,000 12,000 Total For Fund 302: 0 3,000 12,000 COP'S PROGRAM GRANT-STATE (354) 4740-Grant Income 200,000 200,000 200,000 8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 200,000 201,200 201,200 Total For Fund 354: 400,000 401,200 401,200 JUSTICE ASSIST GRNT(JAG)ARRA(356) 4401 -Interest Earnings 2,340 1,870 1,910 4740-Grant Income 0 0 174,800 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 165,240 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P194 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 356: 2,340 1,870 341,950 JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT(JAG)(361) 4740-Grant Income 40,000 40,000 40,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 13,070 Total For Fund 361: 40,000 40,000 53,070 COPS SECURE OUR SCHOOLS GRANT(373) 4740-Grant Income 130,430 1,560 20,280 8017-Transfer In-Law Enforcment Rsv 130,430 16,440 30,160 Total For Fund 373: 260,860 18,000 50,440 COPS HIRING PROGRAM GRANT(374) 4740-Grant Income 0 0 45,000 8001 -Transfer In-General Fund 0 0 57,460 Total For Fund 374: 0 0 102,460 DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT(380) 4740-Grant Income 37,940 37,940 99,350 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 5,000 Total For Fund 380: 37,940 37,940 104,350 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 2005(381) 4740-Grant Income 0 0 124,360 Total For Fund 381: 0 0 124,360 AD 82-1 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL(600) 4401 -Interest Earnings 210 170 140 Total For Fund 600: 210 170 140 AD 84-1 DAY CREEK/MELLO(602) 4401 - Interest Earnings 18,330 14,430 12,030 Total For Fund 602: 18,330 14,430 12,030 CFD 2000-01 SOUTH ETIWANDA(607) 4401 -Interest Earnings 20 10 10 Total For Fund 607: 20 10 10 CFD 2000-02 RC CORPORATE PARK(608) 4401 - Interest Earnings 60 60 60 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P195 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 608: 60 60 60 CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT(610) 4401 - Interest Earnings 1,200 1,200 1,200 Total For Fund 610: 1,200 1,200 1,200 CFD 2001-01 (612) 4401 -Interest Earnings 8,100 6,370 5,310 Total For Fund 612: 8,100 6,370 5,310 CFD 2003-01 PROJECT FUND(614) 4401 - Interest Earnings 100 100 100 Total For Fund 614: 100 100 100 CFD 2003-01 CULTURAL CENTER(615) 4401 -Interest Earnings 130 130 130 Total For Fund 615: 130 130 130 CFD 2004-01 RANCHO ETIWANDA ES(617) 4401 - Interest Earnings 390 190 170 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 499,610 499,810 499,830 Total For Fund 617: 500,000 500,000 500,000 CFD 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE(680) 4401 - Interest Earnings 330 320 310 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 99,670 99,680 99,690 Total For Fund 680: 100,000 100,000 100,000 CFD 2006-02 AMADOR ON ROUTE 66(681) 4401 -Interest Earnings 220 200 180 Total For Fund 681: 220 200 180 SPORTS COMPLEX(700) 4126-Admissions Tax 30,000 90,000 90,000 4220-Other Licenses& Permits 300 0 0 4411 - Special Event Rental 15,000 15,000 19,000 4419-Other Rental/Lease Income 67,200 61,950 66,000 4425-Stadium Lease-Parking Lt Reimb 66,000 0 0 4426-Stadium Lease-Minimum Rent 84,000 75,000 78,000 4427-Stadium Lease-AddVI Rent(%) 30,000 0 0 4428-Stadium Lease-Office Rent 4,150 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P196 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object - Budget Budget Budget 4520-Recreation Fees 260,210 262,340 261,830 4562-Maintenance Fees 14,000 12,000 6,060 4580- Stadium Security Reimbursement 20,490 34,150 34,150 4583 - Baseball Security Reimb. 66,000 45,000 44,240 4585 -Parking Fees-Sports Complex 28,000 0 0 4901 -Other Revenue 0 9,000 9,000 8001 -Transfer In-General Fund 1,205,050 1,295,880 1,283,580 Total For Fund 700: 1,890,400 1,900,320 1,891,860 MUNICIPAL UTILITY(705) 4401 - Interest Earnings 23,570 46,900 54,310 4601 -Monthly Srvc Fee-Electric Util 400,000 400,000 400,000 4602-Commodity Fee-Electric Util. 8,600,000 8,600,000 9,300,000 4603-New Srvc Activation Fee-Util. 3,000 3,000 3,000 4604-Dist Line Ext Fee-Elec Utility 0 0 102,730 4605- Wholesale Energy Sales&Cntrt 2,150,000 2,150,000 1,000,000 4610-Late Fee-Electric Utility 9,500 9,500 9,500 4735 -ARB-Cap and Trade Revenue 0 0 250,000 Total For Fund 705: 11,186,070 11,209,400 11,1 19,540 UTILITY PUBLIC BENEFIT FUND(706) 4401 - Interest Earnings 12,490 9,550 8,940 4609-Public Benefit Fund-Elec Util 256,500 256,500 276,450 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 245,920 258,510 164,270 Total For Fund 706: 514,910 524,560 449,660 RCMU CAPITAL REPLACEMENT FUND(708) 4401 - Interest Earnings 0 0 10,080 Total For Fund 708: 0 0 10,080 EQUIPNEHICLE REPLACEMENT(712) 4401 - Interest Earnings 145,430 103,750 87,040 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 649,120 615,060 594,250 Total For Fund 712: 794,550 718,810 681,290 COMP EQUIPITECH REPLCMENT FUND(714) 4401 - Interest Earnings 38,370 13,700 32,560 4419-Other Rental/Lease Income 0 24,000 24,000 4540- Intragovemmental User Fees 590 0 0 4911 - Reimbursement from Other Funds 0 0 98,330 8288-Transfer In-Fund 288 0 0 928,700 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 1,134,270 1,153,900 581,830 Total For Fund 714: 1,173,230 1,191,600 1,665,420 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P197 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget CFD 84-1 REDEMPTION FUND(805) 4103-Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 500 500 500 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 250 250 250 Total For Fund 805: 750 750 750 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/I IGHLND DEBT(812) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 258,830 272,190 274,830 4103-Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 2,850 2,000 6,000 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 300 200 2,000 4401 -Interest Earnings 22,700 20,650 18,010 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 2,210 0 0 Total For Fund 812: 286,890 295,040 300,840 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND IMPR(813) 4401 -Interest Earnings 24,520 22,710 20,440 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 475,480 27,520 29,790 Total For Fund 813: 500,000 50,230 50,230 CFD 88-2 POLICE(815) 4401 -Interest Earnings 160 130 120 8812-Transfer In-AD 88-2 Debt Srvc. 700 700 700 Total For Fund 815: 860 830 820 CFD 2004-01 REDEMPTION(820) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 3,143,820 2,908,790 3,019,550 4103-Property Taxes-PY Sec& Unsec 35,000 35,000 35,000 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 3,500 3,500 10,250 4401 -Interest Earnings 32,330 20,530 16,030 Total For Fund 820: 3,214,650 2,967,820 3,080,830 CFD 2004-01 RESERVE(821) 4401 -Interest Earnings 310 310 0 Total For Fund 821: 310 310 0 AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON(838) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 29,760 31,060 31,290 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec& Unsec 300 320 800 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 30 30 320 4401 -Interest Earnings 2,620 1,720 1,390 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 14,270 18,440 17,770 Total For Fund 838: 46,980 51,570 51,570 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P198 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER(841) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 245,280 245,280 245,810 4401 - Interest Earnings 6,020 4,830 4,240 Total For Fund 841: 251,300 250,110 250,050 CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE(842) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 423,890 105,980 423,890 4401 -Interest Earnings 3,370 3,770 5,960 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 1,250 292,820 0 Total For Fund 842: 428,510 402,570 429,850 PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND(848) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,034,270 1,080,660 1,113,300 4103-Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 10,340 11,500 11,500 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 1,030 1,500 2,750 4401 -Interest Earnings 21,370 11,800 11,160 4419-Other Rental/Lease Income 0 0 108,250 4901 -Other Revenue 7,000 10,000 10,000 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 587,220 556,140 551,500 Total For Fund 848: 1,661,230 1,671,600 1,808,460 PD 85 RESERVE FUND(850) 4401 -Interest Earnings 100 80 60 Total For Fund 850: 100 80 60 CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RDMPTN(852) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 118,570 80,100 74,280 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 1,200 1,200 2,750 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int, 120 120 500 4401 -Interest Earnings 4,650 3,180 630 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 650 21,510 35,800 Total For Fund 852: 125,190 106,110 113,960 CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RSRV(853) 4401 -Interest Earnings 70 10 0 Total For Fund 853: 70 10 0 AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION(854) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 325,830 0 0 4401 -Interest Earnings 2,250 5,210 4,160 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 314,360 315,410 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P199 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 854: 328,080 319,570 319,570 AD 1999-1 REFUNDING RESERVE(855) 4401 -Interest Earnings 8,400 1,350 0 Total For Fund 855: 8,400 1,350 0 CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RDMP(856) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 549,560 537,470 521,130 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 3,000 0 0 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 300 0 0 4401 -Interest Earnings 3,690 2,910 4,080 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 37,910 382,010 418,830 Total For Fund 856: 594,460 922,390 944,040 CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RSRV(857) 4401 -Interest Earnings 390 380 0 Total For Fund 857: 390 380 0 CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT RDMP(858) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 676,190 713,750 727,280 4103-Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 7,500 7,500 22,250 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 750 750 6,000 4401 -Interest Earnings 10,550 - 9,630 9,490 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 16,160 0 0 Total For Fund 858: 711,150 731,630 765,020 CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT RSRV(859) 4401 -Interest Earnings 410 90 0 Total For Fund 859: 410 90 0 CFD 2001-01 SERIES A REDMPTION(860) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,195,370 742,230 744,080 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 15,000 15,000 17,500 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 1,500 1,500 2,750 4401 -Interest Earnings 2,330 260 0 4901 -Other Revenue 50,000 0 0 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 78,900 73,560 Total For Fund 860: 1,264,200 837,890 837,890 CFD 2001-01 SERIES A RESERVE(861) 4401 -Interest Earnings 670 180 640 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P2OO FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 861: 670 180 640 CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION(862) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 83,220 68,270 56,060 4401 - Interest Earnings 30 0 0 4901 -Other Revenue 10,000 0 0 Total For Fund 862: 93,250 68,270 56,060 CFD 2001-01 SERIES B RESERVE(863) 4401 - Interest Earnings 50 10 0 Total For Fund 863: 50 10 0 CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN (864) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,035,290 1,035,290 1,034,870 4103 -Property Taxes-PY Sec&Unsec 750 750 130 4104-Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 100 100 30 4401 -Interest Earnings 12,500 9,780 9,040 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 19,220 26,080 50,350 Total For Fund 864: 1,067,860 1,072,000 1,094,420 CFD 2003-01 SERIES A RESERVE(865) 4401 - Interest Earnings 830 180 0 Total For Fund 865: 830 180 0 CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN(866) 4 101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 196,870 205,070 205,070 4401 - Interest Earnings 1,610 1,210 1,150 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 7,320 440 8,670 Total For Fund 866: 205,800 206,720 214,890 CFD 2003-01 SERIES B RESERVE(867) 4401 -Interest Earnings 170 40 0 Total For Fund 867: 170 40 0 CFD 2000-03 PARK MAINTENANCE(868) 4 101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 320,600 335,000 348,510 4103-Property Taxes-PY Sec& Unsec 3,210 3,600 8,200 4104- Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 320 360 1,680 4401 -Interest Earnings 11,730 8,950 7,990 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 52,940 117,780 99,510 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P201 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 868: 388,800 465,690 465,890 CFD 2006-01 REDEMPTION(869) 4101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 394,950 446,060 452,570 4401 -Interest Earnings 4,360 4,500 4,610 8999-Transfer In From Fund Balance 8,050 0 0 Total For Fund 869: 407,360 450,560 457,180 CFD 2006-01 RESERVE(870) 4401 - Interest Earnings 40 40 0 Total For Fund 870: 40 40 0 CFD 2006-02 REDEMPTION(871) 4 101 -Property Taxes-CY Secured 227,170 245,640 250,760 4401 -Interest Earnings 2,250 2,280 2,390 Total For Fund 871: 229,420 247,920 253,150 CFD 2006-02 RESERVE(872) 4401 - Interest Earnings 20 20 0 Total For Fund 872: 20 20 0 Total for CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: 146,491,760 141,155,170 156,364,680 P202 City of Rancho Cucamonga Amended Fiscal Year 2012/ 13 Budget . 'y EXPENDITURES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P203 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND,DIVISION 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012113 Fund/Description Adopted Adopted Amended Division/Description Budget Budget Budget GENERAL FUND(001) 001 NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 3,209,420 3,284,290 2,650,070 002 NON-DEPARTMENTAL PERSONNEL (135,750) (97,060) 164,950 101 CITY COUNCIL 143,630 138,510 136,460 102 CITY MANAGEMENT 1,209,440 1,111,030 1,034,840 103 CITY CLERK 2,810 2,290 2,300 104 ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES 2,570,490 2,694,820 2,671,300 106 RECORDS MANAGEMENT 454,670 548,810 532,070 201 ADMIN SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 226,260 256,940 252,970 204 BUSINESS LICENSES 347,120 301,780 262,880 205 CITY FACILITIES 2,124,520 1,751,030 1,794,690 206 FINANCE 1,115,200 1,171,570 1,159,000 207 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS 298,900 278,500 300,740 209 INFORMATION SERVICES 2,458,190 2,215,830 2,168,240 210 PERSONNEL 341,010 455,150 399,740 211 PURCHASING 398,350 370,010 333,690 212 RISK MANAGEMENT 208,340 232,910 225,110 213 TREASURY MANAGEMENT 6,210 19,830 17,480 301 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DVLPMN., 112,380 168,840 145,240 302 BUILDING AND SAFETY 2,148,560 1,909,490 1,931,810 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 224,630 296,820 268,950 305 ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT MGT 659,110 595,210 571,550 306 ENGINEERING -NPDES 505,940 411,020 404,420 307 ENGINEERING- PROJECT MGT 169,710 446,020 424,160 308 ENGINEERING-TRAFFIC MGT 185,650 94,320 95,000 312 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 3,929,770 3,621,740 3,552,450 314 PLANNING 1,887,690 1,810,180 1,675,660 315 PLANNING COMMISSION 11,070 12,590 16,760 316 STREET AND PARK MAINT. 4,286,130 4,339,560 4,350,320 317 VEHICLE AND EQUIP. MAINT. 1,309,710 1,064,620 1,059,380 322 CODE ENFORCEMENT 866,210 747,440 756,940 401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 4,438,860 4,222,860 4,155,040 420 PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION 3,030 3,080 3,100 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 27,385,770 28,934,240 29,033,740 TOTAL FOR GENERAL FUND: 63,103,030 63,414,270 62,551,050 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P2O4 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY,FUND,DIVISION 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012113 Fund/Description Adopted Adopted Amended Division/Description Budget Budget Budget REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT(003) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 38,840 38,840 55,050 CVWD REIMBURSEMENTS(006) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 246,880 242,050 239,980 CNTY OF S. B.REIMBURSEMENTS(008) 316 STREET AND PARK MAINT. 86,680 86,680 92,740 COMM DEV TECHNICAL SRVCS FUND(016) 301 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DVLPMNI 171,980 482,010 452,760 LAW ENFORCEMENT RESERVE(017) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 330,090 514,950 71,000 TRAFFIC SAFETY(018) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 404,000 358,200 358,200 INFO TECHNOLOGY-DEVELOPMENT(019) 219 INFO TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 196,860 196,860 196,860 MOBILE HOME PARK PROGRAM (022) 302 BUILDING AND SAFETY 4,650 4,180 4,180 SBI186 CERT ACCESS SPEC PROG (023) 302 BUILDING AND SAFETY 0 0 2,340 CAPITAL RESERVE(025) 001 NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 2,191,490 1,909,790 3,417,260 BENEFITS CONTINGENCY(073) 002 NON-DEPARTMENTAL PERSONNEL 463,270 613,010 1,192,630 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADMIN (100) 202 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMIN 907,710 1,109,880 1,188,760 AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT(105) 208 GRANT MANAGEMENT(AQMD) 661,610 314,090 623,340 BEAUTIFICATION(110) 316 STREET AND PARK MAINT. 94,480 80,700 280,700 DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL(112) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 2,005,580 415,680 1,792,020 DRAINAGE-ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE(114) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 495,000 80 604,560 ETIWANDA DRAINAGE(116) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 111,730 43,610 148,050 UPPER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE(118) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 0 80 80 PARK DEVELOPMENT(120) 305 ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT MGT 1,282,740 0 0 401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 0 551,750 1,682,430 TOTAL FOR PARK DEVELOPMENT: 1,282,740 551,750 1,682,430 SOUTH ETIWANDA DRAINAGE(122) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 0 30 30 TRANSPORTATION(124) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 4,932,620 3,047,590 5,422,670 LOWER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE(126) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 50,000 90 35,830 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES(129) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 1,305,780 1,385,740 111,810 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P205 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND, DIVISION 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Fund/Description Adopted Adopted Amended Division/Description Budget Budget Budget LMD#1 GENERAL CITY(130) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 1,448,840 1,449,110 1,517,040 LMD#2 VICTORIA(131) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 3,028,890 3,102,300 3,198,910 LMD#3A HYSSOP(132) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 4,840 8,030 8,430 LMD#3B MEDIANS(133) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 1,372,220 1,336,830 1,397,890 LMD#411 TERRA VISTA(134) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 2,419,000 2,962,500 2,978,110 LMD#5 TOT LOT(135) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 4,640 14,320 4,510 LMD#611 CARYN COMMUNITY(136) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 450,850 448,860 428,750 LMD#7 NORTH ETIWANDA(137) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 939,630 1,017,000 1,028,240 LMD#8 SOUTH ETIWANDA(138) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 26,030 30,080 32,260 LMD#9 LOWER ETIWANDA(139) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 698,360 721,770 689,370 LMD#10 RANCHO ETIWANDA(140) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 547,920 641,100 649,890 SLD#1 ARTERIAL(151) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 1,090,340 849,610 788,230 SLD#2 RESIDENTIAL(152) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 331,980 316,650 288,820 SLD#3 VICTORIA(153) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 427,230 318,270 305,360 SLD#4 TERRA VISTA(154) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 227,450 176,700 195,580 SLD#5 CARYN COMMUNITY(155) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 82,810 66,420 63,530 SLD#6 INDUSTRIAL AREA(156) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 163,380 131,260 126,230 SLD#7 NORTH ETIWANDA(157) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 308,340 216,400 203,560 SLD#8 SOUTH ETIWANDA(158) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 165,550 104,180 137,690 GAS TAX 2105/PROP111 (170) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 650,710 1,100,570 1,168,630 GAS TAX 2106-2107(172) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 2,079,810 2,136,520 1,992,080 GAS TAX R&T7360(174) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 1,250,000 1,608,210 1,381,980 MEASURE 1 1990-2010(176) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 672,000 0 352,400 MEASURE 12010-2040(177) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 2,192,110 3,373,900 2,868,580 FOOTHILL BLVD MAINTENANCE(186) 316 STREET AND PARK MAINT. 73,590 33,220 33,220 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P206 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY,FUND,DIVISION 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Fund/Description Adopted Adopted Amended Division/Description Budget Budget Budget INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT(188) 313 INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT. 1,148,610 956,530 2,122,760 PROP 42-TRAFFIC CONGESTION MIT(190) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 733,700 697,370 1,575,270 PROPOSITION 1B STATE FUNDING(194) 303 ENGINEERING- ADMINISTRATION 0 125,730 62,930 STATE ASSET SEIZURE(195) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 0 165,900 104,740 CA ASSET SEIZURE 15%(196) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 0 10,250 10,250 FEDERAL ASSET SEIZURE(197) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 0 60 60 CITYWIDE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPRV(198) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 0 338,480 6,834,770 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK GRNT(204) 314 PLANNING 2,031,730 1,034,580 1,027,880 PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3(214) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 0 215,960 90,960 ENRGY EFFICNCY/CONSRVATN GRNT(215) 314 PLANNING 36,960 8,730 13,370 PUBLIC RESRCE GRNTS/HEALTHY RC(218) 102 CITY MANAGEMENT 129,370 157,890 288,810 CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT(225) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 22,000 44,020 45,470 USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT(226) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 20,500 0 0 USED OIL RECYCLING PROGRAM(227) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 0 49,260 59,260 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM (234) 303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 114,800 478,780 590,510 PROP 84 PARK BOND ACT(235) 305 ENGINEERING -DEVELOPMENT MGT 0 283,500 0 RECREATION SERVICES(250) 401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 4,707,680 4,790,740 4,588,580 SENIOR OUTREACH GRANT(258) 401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 7,500 0 6,920 LIBRARY FUND(290) 601 LIBRARY-ADMINISTRATION 903,790 767,950 781,780 603 LITERACY SERVICES 85,480 66,320 66,320 604 BOOKMOBILE SERVICES 115,020 116,160 116,320 605 LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES 1,700 1,700 1,700 606 ARCHIBALD LIBRARY 1,317,350 1,315,430 1,332,370 607 PAUL A. BIANE LIBRARY 1,503,270 1,512,820 1,513,990 608 VIRTUAL LIBRARY 47,600 144,600 137,100 TOTAL FOR LIBRARY FUND: 3,974,210 3,924,980 3,949,580 CA STATE LIBRARY(291) 602 GRANT MANAGEMENT 48,980 6,610 45,850 STAFF INNOVATION FD(CA ST LB)(292) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P207 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY,FUND, DIVISION 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Fund/Description Adopted Adopted Amended Division/Description Budget Budget Budget 602 GRANT MANAGEMENT 0 16,350 127,780 CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN(298) 601 LIBRARY-ADMINISTRATION 105,250 0 0 THE BIG READ LIBRARY GRANT(301) 602 GRANT MANAGEMENT 0 15,000 12,000 LIBRARY SERVICES& TECH.ACT(302) 601 LIBRARY-ADMINISTRATION 0 3,000 12,000 COP'S PROGRAM GRANT-STATE(354) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 400,000 401,200 201,200 JUSTICE ASSIST GRNT(JAG)ARRA(356) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 0 20 176,710 JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT(JAG)(361) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 0 260 53,070 COPS SECURE OUR SCHOOLS GRANT(373) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 108,860 18,000 50,440 COPS HIRING PROGRAM GRANT(374) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 0 0 102,460 DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT(380) 501 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 37,940 37,940 104,350 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 2005(381) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 0 0 81,310 AD 84-1 DAY CREEK/MELLO(602) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 0 150 150 CFD 2001-01 (612) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 0 70 70 CFD 2004-01 RANCHO ETIWANDA ES(617) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 500,000 500,000 500,000 CFD 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE (680) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 100,000 100,000 100,000 SPORTS COMPLEX(700) 201 ADMIN SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 1,531,480 1,526,010 1,514,870 401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 358,920 374,310 370,010 TOTAL FOR SPORTS COMPLEX: 1,890,400 1,900,320 1,884,880 MUNICIPAL UTILITY(705) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 9,468,330 9,155,420 9,220,770 UTILITY PUBLIC BENEFIT FUND(706) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 514,910 524,560 449,970 EQUIPNEHICLE REPLACEMENT(712) 001 NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 794,550 718,810 689,590 COMP EQUIP/TECH REPLCMENT FUND(714) 001 NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 1,173,230 1,191,600 1,601,470 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND DEBT(812) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 286,890 257,460 257,460 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND IMPR(813) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 500,000 50,230 50,230 CFD 2004-01 REDEMPTION(820) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 2,927,260 2,875,960 2,972,800 AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON(838) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P208 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND,DIVISION 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Fund/Description Adopted Adopted Amended Division/Description Budget Budget Budget 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 46,980 51,570 50,830 AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER(841) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 242,730 243,830 243,830 CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE(842) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 428,510 402,570 402,570 PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND(848) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 1,661,230 1,671,600 1,720,680 CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RDMPTN(852) 303 ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 125,190 106,110 1 13,960 AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION(854) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 326,100 319,570 319,570 CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RDMP(856) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 594,460 922,390 944,040 CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT RDMP(858) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 711,150 694,800 704,390 CFD 2001-01 SERIES A REDMPTION(860) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 1,132,750 837,890 837,890 CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION (862) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 90,820 48,740 48,740 CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN (864) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 1,067,860 1,072,000 1,094,420 CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN(866) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 205,800 206,720 214,890 CFD 2000-03 PARK MAINTENANCE(868) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 388,800 465,690 461,900 CFD 2006-01 REDEMPTION(869) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 407,360 396,830 406,610 CFD 2006-02 REDEMPTION(871) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 225,530 213,190 222,990 TOTAL FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: 139,180,470 135,683,190 150,217,610 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P209 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget GENERAL FUND(001) 001 -NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 5100-Travel and Meetings 25,200 21,200 19,450 5102-Training 23,080 20,700 15,800 5105 - Mileage 13,000 0 400 5160- Membership Dues 66,430 66,560 69,480 5200-Operations&Maintenance 50,400 71,750 69,610 5300-Contract Services 442,600 550,880 681,110 5312 - Legal Services 290,000 322,270 392,270 5410- Property Insurance 150,010 169,220 147,720 5411 -Other Insurance 6,300 0 0 5505 -Booking Fees 357,670 489,550 0 5510-Property Tax Admin. Fee 410,820 397,440 91,810 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (305,800) (305,800) 9008-Transfer Out-Fund 008 0 4,800 4,800 9281 -Transfer Out-Fire Fund 168,860 179,840 179,840 9700-Transfer Out-Sports Complex 1,205,050 1,295,880 1,283,580 Total Division: 001 3,209,420 3,284,290 2,650,070 002 -NON-DEPARTMENTAL PERSONNEL 5000- Regular Salaries 0 0 1,890 5010- Part Time Salaries 0 0 120 5060-Tuition Reimbursement 57,300 40,000 24,000 5061 - Employee Development 113,420 116,920 116,920 5065 -Coffee Fund 4,000 3,500 3,500 5097-Proj Fringe Benefit Savings (67,720) (44,950) 0 5099-Projected Salary Savings (270,880) (164,180) 0 5285 -Safety Gear&Equipment 28,130 28,130 28,130 5555 -Projected Budget Savings 0 (66,870) 0 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (9,610) (9,610) Total Division: 002 (135,750) (97,060) 164,950 101 -CITY COUNCIL 5000- Regular Salaries 83,670 108,280 108,280 5030- Fringe Benefits 39,320 39,670 39,670 5100-Travel and Meetings 10,130 13,480 11,430 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 5,000 5,000 5,000 5200-Operations& Maintenance 3,500 3,500 3,500 5220-Cellular Technology 2,010 0 0 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (31,420) (31,420) Total Division: 101 143,630 138,510 136,460 102 -CITY MANAGEMENT 5000-Regular Salaries 770,050 876,700 830,600 5005 -Overtime Salaries 2,000 1,000 1,000 5010-Part Time Salaries 33,340 33,340 18,340 5030- Fringe Benefits 360,640 409,360 392,770 5100-Travel and Meetings 12,380 13,550 15,050 5105 - Mileage 800 800 800 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 6,200 6,200 6,200 5160- Membership Dues 4,290 3,850 3,850 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P210 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5161 - Publications&Subscriptions 1,250 1,250 1,250 5200-Operations&Maintenance 1,000 1,000 1,000 5220-Cellular Technology 2,490 1,020 1,020 5300-Contract Services 15,000 15,000 15,000 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (252,040) (252,040) Total Division: 102 1,209,440 1,111,030 1,034,840 103 -CITY CLERK 5000-Regular Salaries 1,800 1,800 1,810 5030-Fringe Benefits 850 850 850 5160-Membership Dues 160 160 160 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (520) (520) Total Division: 103 2,810 2,290 2,300 104-ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES 5000-Regular Salaries 1,174,950 1,155,520 1,088,170 5005 -Overtime Salaries 85,000 85,000 85,000 5010-Part Time Salaries 246,740 326,910 376,260 5030-Fringe Benefits 562,550 561,420 541,420 5100-Travel and Meetings 3,050 4,550 4,550 5102-Training 1,000 1,000 1,000 5105 -Mileage 6,630 3,500 3,500 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 9,000 9,600 9,600 5160-Membership Dues 1,870 2,070 2,320 5161 - Publications&Subscriptions 100 100 100 5220-Cellular Technology 4,800 4,400 3,110 5260-O&M/Animal Care 238,330 203,950 203,950 5262-O&M/Community&Info Program: 2,000 2,000 2,090 5263 -O&M/Field Services 3,640 5,000 5,000 5264-O&M/Veterinarian Services 0 102,000 102,000 5360-Contract Serv/Animal Care 67,780 70,910 70,910 5362-Contract Serv/Comm & Info Prgm 24,650 9,990 19,990 5363 -Contract Serv/Field Services 15,000 15,000 15,000 5364-Contract Serv/Vet Services 123,400 123,400 123,400 5602 -Capital Outlay-Bldg&Imprvmnt 0 8,500 13,930 Total Division: 104 2,570,490 2,694,820 2,671,300 106- RECORDS MANAGEMENT 5000-Regular Salaries 256,290 256,460 252,460 5005 -Overtime Salaries 250 250 150 5010- Part Time Salaries 0 46,150 41,030 5030-Fringe Benefits 116,230 122,670 122,490 5100-Travel and Meetings 0 4,630 3,130 5102-Training 0 0 3,860 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 4,000 3,500 3,500 5152 -Computer Software 0 180 150 5160-Membership Dues 1,100 1,100 1,000 5200-Operations& Maintenance 50,950 59,520 49,580 5220-Cellular Technology 680 680 1,050 5300-Contract Services 25,170 178,170 178,170 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (124,500) (124,500) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P211 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 106 454,670 548,810 532,070 201 -ADMIN SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 135,680 221,490 217,090 5010- Part Time Salaries 18,430 0 0 5030- Fringe Benefits 63,540 99,420 99,210 5100-Travel and Meetings 2,300 2,300 2,770 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 2,000 2,000 2,000 5152-Computer Software 0 0 290 5160- Membership Dues 410 110 190 5200-Operations&Maintenance 400 400 200 5300-Contract Services 3,500 0 0 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (68,780) (68,780) Total Division: 201 226,260 256,940 252,970 204-BUSINESS LICENSES 5000-Regular Salaries 213,830 200,040 173,720 5010-Part Time Salaries 21,580 0 0 5030-Fringe Benefits 102,590 94,020 81,650 5100-Travel and Meetings 300 300 300 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 3,900 3,900 3,900 5152-Computer Software 60 0 0 5160-Membership Dues 50 50 80 5161 -Publications& Subscriptions 260 0 0 5200-Operations&Maintenance 2,990 2,670 2,420 5215 -0& M/Computer Equipment 700 0 0 5220-Cellular Technology 750 800 810 5300-Contract Services 110 0 0 Total Division: 204 347,120 301,780 262,880 205-CITY FACILITIES 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 57,750 57,750 57,750 5 15 1 -Postage 108,560 108,920 82,320 5200-Operations&Maintenance 73,570 73,950 112,770 5220-Cellular Technology 3,520 3,520 4,290 5300-Contract Services 166,830 166,830 206,830 5400-Telephone Utilities 276,400 279,400 279,400 5401 -Gas Utilities 139,300 139,300 129,970 5402-Water Utilities 44,870 44,870 44,870 5403 - Electric Utilities 1,253,720 1,253,720 1,253,720 5602-Capital Outlay-Bldg& Imprvmnt 0 20,000 20,000 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (397,230) (397,230) Total Division: 205 2,124,520 1,751,030 1,794,690 206- FINANCE 5000- Regular Salaries 741,460 938,870 925,420 5005 -Overtime Salaries 0 1,000 1,240 5010-Part Time Salaries 0 30,570 30,570 5030- Fringe Benefits 345,810 442,690 439,360 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,240 2,940 2,910 5102-Training 1,620 1,930 1,500 5105 -Mileage 50 50 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P212 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 9,000 11,000 11,000 5160- Membership Dues 1,990 1,990 2,020 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 1,530 1,490 1,700 5200-Operations&Maintenance 5,450 5,720 3,900 5220-Cellular Technology 1,250 500 930 5300-Contract Services 5,800 24,600 30,230 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (291,780) (291,780) Total Division: 206 1,115,200 1,171,570 1,159,000 207-GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS 5000- Regular Salaries 175,850 621,700 633,440 5005-Overtime Salaries 0 0 150 5030- Fringe Benefits 82,650 292,200 297,720 5100-Travel and Meetings 2,500 2,500 7,530 5152-Computer Software 1,000 1,000 1,000 5160-Membership Dues 220 220 220 5200-Operations&Maintenance 9,000 9,000 8,970 5300-Contract Services 27,680 26,690 26,520 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (674,810) (674,810) Total Division: 207 298,900 278,500 300,740 209- INFORMATION SERVICES 5000-Regular Salaries 969,650 1,137,280 1,061,580 5005 -Overtime Salaries 19,000 19,000 19,000 5030- Fringe Benefits 451,510 530,190 498,940 5100-Travel and Meetings 5,680 5,680 5,680 5102-Training 21,600 19,970 19,010 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 3,000 3,000 3,000 5152-Computer Software 52,650 52,650 37,650 5160-Membership Dues 590 590 590 5161 - Publications&Subscriptions 1,750 1,750 1,750 5200-Operations&Maintenance 24,500 29,500 29,500 5220-Cellular Technology 5,800 5,350 5,350 5300-Contract Services 902,460 912,090 987,410 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (501,220) (501,220) Total Division: 209 2,458,190 2,215,830 2,168,240 210- PERSONNEL 5000-Regular Salaries 160,710 314,540 260,790 5030-Fringe Benefits 73,560 143,330 122,570 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,780 1,780 3,890 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 2,500 2,500 8,700 5152-Computer Software 0 0 590 5160- Membership Dues 1,410 1,490 1,770 5161 - Publications&Subscriptions 600 600 300 5200-Operations&Maintenance 27,950 26,450 36,630 5300-Contract Services 72,500 62,500 62,540 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (98,040) (98,040) Total Division: 210 341,010 455,150 399,740 211 - PURCHASING 5000- Regular Salaries 223,580 262,270 224,250 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P213 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5005 -Overtime Salaries 0 0 30 5010- Part Time Salaries 52,620 53,910 65,750 5030-Fringe Benefits 110,870 129,340 105,400 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,600 1,600 1,620 5102-Training 750 750 750 5105 -Mileage 100 100 60 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 4,340 2,500 2,200 5160- Membership Dues 900 900 900 5161 - Publications&Subscriptions 60 60 60 5200-Operations&Maintenance 2,750 2,230 1,400 5220-Cellular Technology 780 180 100 5300-Contract Services 0 0 15,000 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (83,830) (83,830) Total Division: 211 398,350 370,010 333,690 212- RISK MANAGEMENT 5000-Regular Salaries 97,190 133,560 132,560 5030-Fringe Benefits 45,400 61,650 61,190 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,700 1,700 670 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 500 500 500 5152-Computer Software 0 0 290 5160- Membership Dues 200 200 200 5161 - Publications& Subscriptions 2,500 2,500 2,500 5200-Operations&Maintenance 24,000 23,500 25,500 5300-Contract Services 36,850 56,850 49,250 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (47,550) (47,550) Total Division: 212 208,340 232,910 225,110 213 -TREASURY MANAGEMENT 5000- Regular Salaries 1,800 1,800 1,810 5030-Fringe Benefits 850 850 850 5100-Travel and Meetings 950 950 870 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 200 420 420 5160-Membership Dues 60 60 60 5200-Operations&Maintenance 590 1,250 1,260 5300-Contract Services 1,760 19,000 16,710 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (4,500) (4,500) Total Division: 213 6,210 19,830 17,480 301 - ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DVLPMNT 5000-Regular Salaries 77,060 116,390 98,800 5030-Fringe Benefits 35,320 52,450 46,440 Total Division: 301 112,380 168,840 145,240 302-BUILDING AND SAFETY 5000- Regular Salaries 1,446,440 1,266,540 1,256,540 5030- Fringe Benefits 675,170 591,580 590,570 5094- Fire Cap Proj Salary Reimb (50,270) 0 0 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,670 1,520 1,520 5102-Training 3,500 3,500 3,500 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 8,500 8,500 8,500 5160- Membership Dues 2,580 2,380 2,380 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P214 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012113 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 0 0 170 5200-Operations&Maintenance 5,670 5,670 5,670 5220-Cellular Technology 7,000 6,500 5,500 5300-Contract Services 28,300 23,300 57,460 5303 -Contract Serv/Reimbursable 20,000 0 0 Total Division: 302 2,148,560 1,909,490 1,931,810 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 192,110 188,040 156,170 5010-Part Time Salaries 0 0 17,100 5030- Fringe Benefits 89,050 86,720 75,870 5095- RDA Cap Proj Salary Reimb (80,970) 0 0 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,720 1,720 1,720 5105 - Mileage 200 200 100 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 8,170 8,170 8,170 5160-Membership Dues 950 990 840 5200-Operations& Maintenance 3,500 2,480 2,480 5220-Cellular Technology 4,800 4,800 4,500 5300-Contract Services 5,100 3,700 2,000 Total Division: 303 224,630 296,820 268,950 305 - ENGINEERING- DEVELOPMENT MGT 5000-Regular Salaries 453,120 343,530 341,380 5005 -Overtime Salaries 500 0 0 5030- Fringe Benefits 212,270 161,460 160,450 5095 - RDA Cap Proj Salary Reimb (99,300) 0 0 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,150 1,150 1,150 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 1,500 1,200 1,200 5160-Membership Dues 960 960 460 5200-Operations&Maintenance 2,410 2,410 2,410 5300-Contract Services 6,500 4,500 14,500 5303 -Contract Serv/Reimbursable 80,000 80,000 50,000 Total Division: 305 659,110 595,210 571,550 306- ENGINEERING-NPDES 5000-Regular Salaries 160,410 104,130 104,130 5005 -Overtime Salaries 0 0 140 5030- Fringe Benefits 74,040 47,590 47,590 5100-Travel and Meetings 4,390 1,500 1,760 5102-Training 3,100 3,100 3,100 5160- Membership Dues 500 700 700 5165 -Licenses, Permits&Fees 250,000 249,000 242,000 5200-Operations&Maintenance 8,500 3,000 3,000 5300-Contract Services 5,000 2,000 2,000 Total Division: 306 505,940 411,020 404,420 307-ENGINEERING- PROJECT MGT 5000-Regular Salaries 459,390 275,830 260,830 5030-Fringe Benefits 213,800 127,530 122,590 5095 -RDA Cap Proj Salary Reimb (525,070) 0 0 5100-Travel and Meetings 270 300 300 5102-Training 1,900 1,900 6,850 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P215 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 2,600 2,600 2,600 5160- Membership Dues 810 500 550 5200-Operations&Maintenance 2,510 2,510 2,510 5215 -0&M/Computer Equipment 0 2,590 1,300 5220-Cellular Technology 0 1,260 630 5300-Contract Services 13,500 31,000 26,000 Total Division: 307 169,710 446,020 424,160 308- ENGINEERING -TRAFFIC MGT 5000- Regular Salaries 152,320 61,980 62,150 5030- Fringe Benefits 71,590 29,130 29,210 5095 - RDA Cap Proj Salary Reimb (42,420) 0 0 5100-Travel and Meetings 540 400 840 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 1,860 1,500 1,500 5160-Membership Dues 960 960 950 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 100 100 100 5200-Operations&Maintenance 600 150 150 5280- Equip Operations&Maint 100 100 100 Total Division: 308 185,650 94,320 95,000 312 -FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 5000-Regular Salaries 1,196,030 1,201,040 1,156,630 5005 -Overtime Salaries 75,000 75,000 86,500 5010-Part Time Salaries 302,860 238,880 217,320 5030-Fringe Benefits 595,280 598,080 574,960 5093 -Other Funds-Salary Reimbursmnt (107,790) (107,790) (119,290) 5095 - RDA Cap Proj Salary Reimb (146,920) 0 0 5100-Travel and Meetings 480 480 240 5102-Training 7,500 7,500 4,500 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 2,000 2,000 4,000 5160-Membership Dues 730 730 730 5204 0&M/Facilities 483,970 450,480 457,980 5215 -0&M/Computer Equipment 0 0 3,120 5252- Emergency Equipment&Veh Rod 18,670 18,670 8,150 5304-Contract Serv/Facilities 1,501,960 1,503,380 1,524,320 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (366,710) (366,710) Total Division: 312 3,929,770 3,621,740 3,552,450 314- PLANNING 5000-Regular Salaries 929,210 894,190 783,140 5030-Fringe Benefits 433,120 418,920 368,080 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,550 1,550 1,550 5102-Training 500 500 500 5105-Mileage 570 100 80 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 8,000 4,000 4,000 5160-Membership Dues 2,450 640 930 5161 -Publications& Subscriptions 1,750 1,750 2,250 5200-Operations& Maintenance 25,900 25,000 23,800 5220-Cellular Technology 640 500 450 5300-Contract Services 44,000 23,030 50,880 5303-Contract Serv/Reimbursable 440,000 440,000 440,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P216 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 314 1,887,690 1,810,180 1,675,660 315 - PLANNING COMMISSION 5000- Regular Salaries 9,000 9,000 9,020 5030-Fringe Benefits 0 0 130 5 100-Travel and Meetings 1,800 3,320 7,220 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 120 120 120 5200-Operations&Maintenance 150 150 270 Total Division: 315 11,070 12,590 16,760 316-STREET AND PARK MAINT. 5000- Regular Salaries 1,180,980 1,215,810 1,170,810 5005 -Overtime Salaries 97,490 97,490 97,490 5010-Part Time Salaries 145,020 91,760 79,200 5030-Fringe Benefits 564,680 577,590 561,700 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,840 1,580 1,580 5102-Training 29,250 37,980 38,480 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 5,000 10,700 10,700 5152-Computer Software 0 0 3,370 5160-Membership Dues 9,340 9,400 9,100 5161 - Publications&Subscriptions 2,980 3,180 3,180 5200-Operations&Maintenance 722,440 714,090 725,640 5215 -O&M/Computer Equipment 0 0 1,890 5220-Cellular Technology 29,000 29,000 41,000 5252-Emergency Equipment&Veh Rail 15,000 15,000 15,000 5280- Equip Operations& Maint 22,000 22,000 22,000 5300-Contract Services 1,067,060 1,121,600 1,141,220 5320- Hazardous Waste Removal 24,320 24,320 24,320 5400-Telephone Utilities 7,350 7,950 7,950 5402-Water Utilities 327,300 317,920 353,410 5403 -Electric Utilities 35,080 42,190 42,280 Total Division: 316 4,286,130 4,339,560 4,350,320 317 -VEHICLE AND EQUIP. MAINT. 5000- Regular Salaries 268,340 270,790 265,790 5005 -Overtime Salaries 16,360 16,360 16,360 5010-Part Time Salaries 31,860 31,860 31,860 5030-Fringe Benefits 129,620 131,860 129,510 5102-Training 700 350 70 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 500 500 500 5160- Membership Dues 480 480 550 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 0 1,700 1,620 5200-Operations&Maintenance 74,920 73,220 73,220 5250-Vehicle Operations&Maint. 139,100 139,100 139,100 5255-Gasoline 381,000 350,000 350,000 5256- Diesel Fuel 90,000 65,000 65,000 5257-CNG Fuel 55,000 12,600 15,000 5280-Equip Operations&Maint 6,830 6,830 6,830 5300-Contract Services 115,000 103,200 103,200 5990-Cost Allocation Plan Offset 0 (139,230) (139,230) Total Division: 317 1,309,710 1,064,620 1,059,380 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P217 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 322-CODE ENFORCEMENT 5000- Regular Salaries 534,360 439,340 436,340 5005-Overtime Salaries 1,000 1,000 1,000 5010-Part Time Salaries 0 27,100 35,100 5030-Fringe Benefits 248,470 207,720 207,460 5100-Travel and Meetings 500 500 500 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 2,400 2,300 3,300 5160-Membership Dues 150 150 150 5200-Operations&Maintenance 2,030 2,030 2,030 5220-Cellular Technology 3,800 3,800 4,000 5300-Contract Services 73,500 63,500 67,060 Total Division: 322 866,210 747,440 756,940 401 -COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 2,101,800 1,936,770 1,914,770 5005 -Overtime Salaries 1,000 1,000 2,500 5010-Part Time Salaries 640,670 627,540 590,790 5030-Fringe Benefits 1,022,920 955,020 944,900 5100-Travel and Meetings 4,350 5,250 5,350 5102-Training 3,300 1,000 1,000 5105- Mileage 2,500 2,500 1,800 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 41,200 36,000 36,010 5152-Computer Software 0 1,400 1,230 5160-Membership Dues 5,330 3,650 3,660 5161 - Publications&Subscriptions 1,700 1,120 850 5200-Operations& Maintenance 209,090 209,860 214,600 5215 -0&M/Computer Equipment 0 0 5,560 5220-Cellular Technology 4,500 4,500 4,500 5300-Contract Services 399,450 436,200 426,070 5400-Telephone Utilities 1,050 1,050 1,450 Total Division: 401 4,438,860 4,222,860 4,155,040 420- PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,500 1,500 1,500 5160-Membership Dues 1,200 1,250 1,270 5200-Operations&Maintenance 330 330 330 Total Division: 420 3,030 3,080 3,100 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5100-Travel and Meetings 4,860 4,860 5,910 5102-Training 19,000 25,000 25,000 5105-Mileage 500 0 0 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 50,000 55,000 55,000 5160-Membership Dues 2,100 1,700 1,700 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 5,200 5,200 5,200 5200-Operations&Maintenance 84,000 84,000 84,000 5201 -0&M/Volunteer Program 18,000 20,000 20,000 5210-0& M/Crime Prevention 31,500 12,000 12,000 5220-Cellular Technology 74,150 74,150 74,150 5250-Vehicle Operations&Maint. 420,000 385,000 385,000 5253 -Vehicle Collision Repair 100,000 135,000 135,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P218 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5255 -Gasoline 437,270 401,850 401,850 5300-Contract Services 26,110,190 27,702,570 27,743,720 5303 -Contract Serv/Reimbursable 29,000 27,910 22,250 5703 -Capital Lease Payment 0 0 5,500 9374-Transfer Out-Fund 374 0 0 57,460 Total Division: 701 27,385,770 28,934,240 29,033,740 Total For Fund 001: 63,103,030 63,414,270 62,551,050 REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT(003) 701 -POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5200-Operations&Maintenance 38,840 38,840 55,050 Total Division: 701 38,840 38,840 55,050 Total For Fund 003: 38,840 38,840 55,050 CVWD REIMBURSEMENTS(006) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 130,870 128,450 126,180 5030- Fringe Benefits 61,510 59,100 59,300 5200-Operations&Maintenance 43,000 43,000 43,000 5250-Vehicle Operations&Maint. 10,000 10,000 10,000 5252-Emergency Equipment&Veh Rntl 1,000 1,000 1,000 5280- Equip Operations&Maint 500 500 500 Total Division: 303 246,880 242,050 239,980 Total For Fund 006: 246,880 242,050 239,980 CNTY OF S. B. REIMBURSEMENTS (008) 316- STREET AND PARK MAINT. 5300-Contract Services 86,680 86,680 92,740 Total Division: 316 86,680 86,680 92,740 . Total For Fund 008: 86,680 86,680 92,740 COMM DEV TECHNICAL SRVCS FUND(016) 301 - ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DVLPMNT 5000-Regular Salaries 26,860 26,860 22,400 5030- Fringe Benefits 12,620 12,620 10,530 5102 -Training 0 0 2,920 5152-Computer Software 0 60,640 60,640 5200-Operations&Maintenance 3,000 1,500 0 5215 -O& M/Computer Equipment 0 184,920 122,800 5220-Cellular Technology 0 0 630 5300-Contract Services 90,000 195,470 232,840 5603 -Capital Outlay-Equipment 39,500 0 0 Total Division: 301 171,980 482,010 452,760 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P219 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 016: 171,980 482,010 452,760 LAW ENFORCEMENT RESERVE(017) 701 -POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 840 840 5602-Capital Outlay-Bldg&Imprvmnt 0 100,000 0 5650-Capital Project 0 40,000 40,000 9001 -Transfer Out-General Fund 199,660 357,670 0 9373 -Transfer Out-Fund 373 130,430 16,440 30,160 Total Division: 701 330,090 514,950 71,000 Total For Fund 017: 330,090 514,950 71,000 TRAFFIC SAFETY(018) 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5300-Contract Services 404,000 358,200 358,200 Total Division: 701 404,000 358,200 358,200 Total For Fund 018: 404,000 358,200 358,200 INFO TECHNOLOGY-DEVELOPMENT(019) 219- INFO TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 5000-Regular Salaries 133,920 0 0 5030-Fringe Benefits 62,940 0 0 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 196,860 196,860 Total Division: 219 196,860 196,860 196,860 Total For Fund 019: 196,860 196,860 196,860 MOBILE HOME PARK PROGRAM (022) 302- BUILDING AND SAFETY 5200-Operations&Maintenance 4,650 4,150 4,150 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 30 30 Total Division: 302 4,650 4,180 4,180 Total For Fund 022: 4,650 4,180 4,180 SB1186 CERT ACCESS SPEC PROG (023) 302- BUILDING AND SAFETY 5102-Training 0 0 700 5200-Operations&Maintenance 0 0 1,640 Total Division: 302 0 0 2,340 Total For Fund 023: 0 0 2,340 CAPITAL RESERVE (025) 001 -NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P220 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5005 -Overtime Salaries 73,650 0 0 5152-Computer Software 0 0 600 5165 -Licenses,Permits&Fees 0 0 170 5200-Operations&Maintenance 5,000 12,500 114,640 5204-O&M/Facilities 10,000 10,000 6,000 5207-O&M/Capital Supplies 0 0 60,000 5215 -O&M/Computer Equipment 0 0 4,550 5252-Emergency Equipment&Veh Rml 5,000 5,000 5,000 5300-Contract Services 262,000 156,000 298,330 5304-Contract Serv/Facilities 30,000 30,000 20,000 5411 -Other Insurance 0 7,020 7,020 5416-General Liability Insurance 513,080 377,110 377,110 5417-General Liability Claims 350,000 350,000 350,000 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 13,420 13,420 5601 -Capital Outlay-Building 0 0 38,790 5602-Capital Outlay-Bldg&Imprvmnt 437,500 264,000 243,590 5603 -Capital Outlay-Equipment 22,500 0 62,180 5607-Cap Outlay-Impry Oth Than Bldg 0 285,750 212,610 5650-Capital Project 100,000 0 1,204,260 9001 -Transfer Out-General Fund 382,760 398,990 398,990 Total Division: 001 2,191,490 1,909,790 3,417,260 Total For Fund 025: 2,191,490 1,909,790 3,417,260 BENEFITS CONTINGENCY(073) 002-NON-DEPARTMENTAL PERSONNEL 5000-Regular Salaries 300,000 300,000 876,570 5096- Supplementary Retirement Plan 0 275,690 275,690 5098-Vol. Sep. Program 18,520 3,640 3,640 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 2,760 2,760 9001 -Transfer Out-General Fund 144,750 30,920 33,970 Total Division: 002 463,270 613,010 1,192,630 Total For Fund 073: 463,270 613,010 1,192,630 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADMIN (100) 202-ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMIN 5000- Regular Salaries 515,360 106,020 106,610 5030-Fringe Benefits 241,660 49,530 50,110 5102-Training 11,500 11,500 11,500 5105 -Mileage 1,750 1,750 1,750 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 1,000 1,000 1,000 5151 - Postage 12,000 12,000 12,000 5152-Computer Software 6,000 6,000 6,000 5200-Operations&Maintenance 27,800 30,800 30,800 5215 -O&M/Computer Equipment 0 0 13,780 5220-Cellular Technology 1,700 1,700 1,700 5300-Contract Services 68,940 168,940 232,870 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P221 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 20,000 720,640 720,640 Total Division: 202 907,710 1,109,880 1,188,760 Total For Fund 100: 907,710 1,109,880 1,188,760 AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT(105) 208 - GRANT MANAGEMENT(AQMD) 5000- Regular Salaries 21,240 0 0 5030- Fringe Benefits 9,980 0 0 5102-Training 2,500 2,500 0 5200-Operations&Maintenance 114,290 23,730 23,730 5300-Contract Services 1,600 1,600 1,600 5501 -Admin,/General Overhead 0 9,260 9,260 5603 -Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 200,000 12,000 5604-Capital Outlay-Vehicles 512,000 77,000 576,750 Total Division: 208 661,610 314,090 623,340 Total For Fund 105: 661,610 314,090 623,340 BEAUTIFICATION (110) 316- STREET AND PARK MAINT. 5000- Regular Salaries 46,640 0 0 5030- Fringe Benefits 21,920 0 0 5300-Contract Services 6,000 0 0 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5,070 4,850 4,850 5650-Capital Project 14,850 75,850 275,850 Total Division: 316 94,480 80,700 280,700 Total For Fund 110: 94,480 80,700 280,700 DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL(112) 303 -ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 102,550 82,330 84,550 5030- Fringe Benefits 48,030 38,530 39,740 5215 -O&M/Computer Equipment 0 780 390 5300-Contract Services 0 25,000 0 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 27,000 9,040 9,040 5650-Capital Project 1,828,000 260,000 1,658,300 Total Division: 303 2,005,580 415,680 1,792,020 Total For Fund 112: 2,005,580 415,680 1,792,020 DRAINAGE-ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE(114) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 0 80 80 5650-Capital Project 495,000 0 604,480 Total Division: 303 495,000 80 604,560 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P222 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 114: 495,000 80 604,560 ETIWANDA DRAINAGE(116) 303 -ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 40,630 26,970 26,590 5030- Fringe Benefits 19,100 12,680 12,500 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 12,000 3,960 3,960 5650-Capital Project 40,000 0 105,000 Total Division: 303 111,730 43,610 148,050 Total For Fund 116: 111,730 43,610 148,050 UPPER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE(118) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 80 80 Total Division: 303 0 80 80 Total For Fund 118: 0 80 80 PARK DEVELOPMENT(120) 305 -ENGINEERING-DEVELOPMENT MGT 5000-Regular Salaries 89,540 0 0 5030- Fringe Benefits 42,080 0 0 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,880 0 0 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 1,000 0 0 5160- Membership Dues 170 0 0 5161 - Publications& Subscriptions 1,100 0 0 5200-Operations& Maintenance 11,850 0 0 5300-Contract Services 64,000 0 0 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 26,120 0 0 5650-Capital Project 1,045,000 0 0 Total Division: 305 1,282,740 0 0 401 -COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 0 89,540 89,580 5030-Fringe Benefits 0 42,080 42,100 5100-Travel and Meetings 0 1,000 1,000 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 0 1,000 1,000 5160- Membership Dues 0 570 570 5161 -Publications& Subscriptions 0 1,100 1,100 5200-Operations& Maintenance 0 6,850 6,850 5300-Contract Services 0 50,000 40,000 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 9,610 9,610 5650-Capital Project 0 350,000 858,620 9128 -Transfer Out-Fund 128 0 0 632,000 Total Division: 401 0 551,750 1,682,430 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P223 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 120: 1,282,740 551,750 1,682,430 SOUTH ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (122) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 30 30 Total Division: 303 0 30 30 Total For Fund 122: 0 30 30 TRANSPORTATION (124) 303 -ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 607,160 589,010 585,540 5030- Fringe Benefits 284,690 276,160 275,200 5160-Membership Dues 600 600 600 5215-O& M/Computer Equipment 0 7,110 6,060 5300-Contract Services 40,920 40,920 41,270 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 104,250 68,790 68,790 5650-Capital Project 3,895,000 2,065,000 4,445,210 Total Division: 303 4,932,620 3,047,590 5,422,670 Total For Fund 124: 4,932,620 3,047,590 5,422,670 LOWER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE(126) 303 -ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 90 90 5650-Capital Project 50,000 0 35,740 Total Division: 303 50,000 90 35,830 Total For Fund 126: 50,000 90 35,830 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES(129) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 31,850 11,810 11,810 5650-Capital Project 1,273,930 1,373,930 100,000 Total Division: 303 1,305,780 1,385,740 111,810 Total For Fund 129: 1,305,780 1,385,740 111,810 LMD#1 GENERAL CITY(130) 303 - ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 142,250 146,770 144,290 5010-Part Time Salaries 22,400 22,400 24,900 5030-Fringe Benefits 69,060 71,770 71,410 5200-Operations&Maintenance 68,850 68,850 77,650 5204-O&M/Facilities 11,500 6,500 6,500 5250-Vehicle Operations&Maint. 2,000 2,000 2,000 5280-Equip Operations& Maint 3,800 3,800 5,300 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P224 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object - Budget Budget Budget 5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 440 0 0 5300-Contract Services 604,300 554,030 595,850 5304-Contract Serv/Facilities 0 5,000 5,000 5310-Tree Maintenance 63,260 63,260 63,260 5400-Telephone Utilities 3,440 3,800 2,550 5402-Water Utilities 247,530 303,540 317,640 5403 - Electric Utilities 57,410 65,330 68,630 5500-Assessment Administration 65,020 65,020 65,020 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 82,190 67,040 67,040 5604-Capital Outlay-Vehicles 5,390 0 0 Total Division: 303 1,448,840 1,449,110 1,517,040 Total For Fund 130: 1,448,840 1,449,110 1,517,040 LMD#2 VICTORIA (131) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 706,010 681,510 672,510 5005 -Overtime Salaries 1,090 1,090 1,450 5010-Part Time Salaries 80,320 80,320 80,320 5030- Fringe Benefits 339,100 327,900 327,660 5200-Operations&Maintenance 66,550 56,550 56,850 5250-Vehicle Operations&Maint. 5,000 5,000 5,000 5300-Contract Services 846,780 825,290 860,920 53 10-Tree Maintenance 37,350 94,950 94,950 5400-Telephone Utilities 1,010 1,180 1,250 5402-Water Utilities 635,400 720,960 782,230 5403 - Electric Utilities 79,480 82,660 90,880 5500-Assessment Administration 34,870 34,870 34,870 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 184,380 190,020 190,020 5604-Capital Outlay-Vehicles 11,550 0 0 Total Division: 303 3,028,890 3,102,300 3,198,910 Total For Fund 131: 3,028,890 3,102,300 3,198,910 LMD#3A HYSSOP(132) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5200-Operations& Maintenance 200 500 800 5300-Contract Services 3,230 5,940 6,040 5402- Water Utilities 500 900 900 5403 - Electric Utilities 600 600 600 5500-Assessment Administration 50 50 50 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 260 40 40 Total Division: 303 4,840 8,030 8,430 Total For Fund 132: 4,840 8,030 8,430 LMD#3B MEDIANS(133) 303 -ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P225 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5000- Regular Salaries 313,880 317,220 313,220 5005 -Overtime Salaries 2,630 2,630 2,630 5010- Part Time Salaries 53,700 53,700 58,700 5030- Fringe Benefits 153,140 155,990 154,950 5200-Operations& Maintenance 58,900 58,900 59,200 5204-O& M/Facilities 8,500 8,500 6,000 5250-Vehicle Operations& Maint. 1,500 1,500 1,500 5252- Emergency Equipment&Veh Rntl 2,000 2,000 2,000 5280- Equip Operations& Maint 12,000 12,000 12,000 5300-Contract Services 402,340 400,420 467,930 5304-Contract Serv/Facilities 128,500 98,500 96,000 5310-Tree Maintenance 21,850 21,850 21,850 5400-Telephone Utilities 1,420 1,560 530 5402 -Water Utilities 70,750 87,020 96,340 5403 - Electric Utilities 35,950 44,230 44,230 5500-Assessment Administration 6,170 6,170 6,170 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 68,990 54,640 54,640 5650-Capital Project 30,000 10,000 0 Total Division: 303 1,372,220 1,336,830 1,397,890 Total For Fund 133: 1,372,220 1,336,830 1,397,890 LMD#4R TERRA VISTA(134) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 595,920 612,420 602,420 5005 -Overtime Salaries 1,050 1,050 1,050 5010- Part Time Salaries 32,280 32,280 39,780 5030- Fringe Benefits 282,680 290,190 288,880 5200-Operations& Maintenance 67,150 67,150 72,150 5250-Vehicle Operations& Maint. 6,000 6,000 6,000 5252-Emergency Equipment& Veh Rntl 0 750 750 5280- Equip Operations& Maint 3,750 3,750 3,750 5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 150 0 0 5300-Contract Services 367,690 667,900 708,050 5310-Tree Maintenance 10,180 32,000 32,000 5400-Telephone Utilities 2,560 2,910 2,910 5402-Water Utilities 249,730 332,530 332,530 5403 -Electric Utilities 33,960 35,070 39,360 5500-Assessment Administration 23,010 23,010 22,990 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 177,110 132,490 132,490 5604-Capital Outlay-Vehicles 10,780 0 0 5650-Capital Project 555,000 723,000 693,000 Total Division: 303 2,419,000 2,962,500 2,978,110 Total For Fund 134: 2,419,000 2,962,500 2,978,110 LMD#5 TOT LOT(135) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P226 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5010- Part Time Salaries 0 0 420 5030-Fringe Benefits 0 0 60 5200-Operations&Maintenance 800 800 800 5250-Vehicle Operations&Maint. 70 70 70 5300-Contract Services 2,430 12,340 1,930 5402- Water Utilities 480 510 630 5403 - Electric Utilities 260 320 320 5500-Assessment Administration 240 240 240 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 360 40 40 Total Division: 303 4,640 14,320 4,510 Total For Fund 135: 4,640 14,320 4,510 LMD#611 CARYN COMMUNITY(136) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 7,230 7,230 7,230 5030- Fringe Benefits 3,400 3,400 3,400 5200-Operations& Maintenance 10,010 10,760 11,060 5300-Contract Services 279,700 276,200 254,780 5310-Tree Maintenance 16,870 16,870 16,870 5402-Water Utilities 89,780 100,260 100,260 5403 - Electric Utilities 5,950 7,300 8,310 5500-Assessment Administration 7,020 7,020 7,020 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 30,890 19,820 19,820 Total Division: 303 450,850 448,860 428,750 Total For Fund 136: 450,850 448,860 428,750 LMD#7 NORTH ETIWANDA (137) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 167,800 171,000 168,500 5010- Part Time Salaries 10,380 10,380 10,380 5030-Fringe Benefits 79,770 81,050 80,700 5200-Operations&Maintenance 46,660 46,660 51,160 5204-O&M/Facilities 1,000 1,000 0 5250-Vehicle Operations&Maint. 2,500 2,500 2,500 5300-Contract Services 300,180 301,930 311,960 5310-Tree Maintenance 6,950 6,950 6,950 5400-Telephone Utilities 1,300 1,500 1,050 5402-Water Utilities 221,610 295,540 295,540 5403 - Electric Utilities 23,840 23,840 24,850 5500-Assessment Administration 15,080 15,080 15,080 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 58,710 59,570 59,570 5604-Capital.Outlay-Vehicles 3,850 0 0 Total Division: 303 939,630 1,017,000 1,028,240 Total For Fund 137: 939,630 1,017,000 1,028,240 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P227 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget LMD#8 SOUTH ETIWANDA (138) 303 -ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 1,450 1,450 1,450 5030- Fringe Benefits 680 680 680 5200-Operations& Maintenance 1,000 1,000 1,000 5300-Contract Services 9,630 9,260 13,200 5310-Tree Maintenance 4,300 4,300 4,300 5402-Water Utilities 4,920 6,470 4,590 5403 - Electric Utilities 890 910 1,030 5500-Assessment Administration 1,040 1,040 1,040 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 2,120 4,970 4,970 Total Division: 303 26,030 30,080 32,260 Total For Fund 138: 26,030 30,080 32,260 LMD#9 LOWER ETIWANDA(139) 303 - ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 150,160 156,090 153,590 5010-Part Time Salaries 7,860 7,860 12,860 5030- Fringe Benefits 70,940 73,980 73,600 5200-Operations&Maintenance 24,550 52,750 51,550 5215 -0&M/Computer Equipment 0 2,430 2,430 5220-Cellular Technology 0 1,080 900 5252- Emergency Equipment&Veh Rod 1,200 1,200 1,200 5280- Equip Operations& Maint 0 0 1,500 5300-Contract Services 229,260 333,440 298,800 5310-Tree Maintenance 6,600 26,050 26,050 5402-Water Utilities 25,990 27,550 27,550 5403 - Electric Utilities 8,730 8,730 8,730 5500-Assessment Administration 8,750 8,750 8,750 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 54,320 21,860 21,860 5607-Cap Outlay-Impry Oth Than Bldg 60,000 0 0 5650-Capital Project 50,000 0 0 Total Division: 303 698,360 721,770 689,370 Total For Fund 139: 698,360 721,770 689,370 LMD#10 RANCHO ETIWANDA(140) 303 -ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 136,730 142,510 142,510 5005 -Overtime Salaries 1,050 1,050 1,050 5010-Part Time Salaries 27,590 27,590 32,590 5030- Fringe Benefits 66,880 70,340 70,960 5200-Operations& Maintenance 26,500 26,500 39,800 5204-0&M/Facilities 4,000 4,000 2,000 5215 -0&M/Computer Equipment 0 810 810 5220-Cellular Technology 0 360 300 5252- Emergency Equipment&Veh Rntl 1,000 1,000 1,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P228 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5280-Equip Operations&Maint 1,000 1,000 1,000 5300-Contract Services 121,290 168,730 144,050 5304-Contract Serv/Facilities 2,000 2,000 0 53 10-Tree Maintenance 6,860 15,260 15,260 5402-Water Utilities 61,240 79,130 87,160 5403 - Electric Utilities 54,110 54,110 64,690 5500-Assessment Administration 4,130 4,130 4,130 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 31,230 42,580 42,580 5604-Capital Outlay-Vehicles 2,310 0 0 Total Division: 303 547,920 641,100 649,890 Total For Fund 140: 547,920 641,100 649,890 SLD#1 ARTERIAL (151) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 22,080 13,170 13,170 5010-Part Time Salaries 12,700 13,340 13,340 5030- Fringe Benefits 11,780 8,110 8,110 5102-Training 180 180 180 5160-Membership Dues 4,030 4,030 4,030 5200-Operations& Maintenance 4,940 4,940 4,940 5280-Equip Operations&Maint 500 500 500 5400-Telephone Utilities 1,180 800 1,030 5403 -Electric Utilities 804,800 612,160 550,550 5500-Assessment Administration 158,200 158,960 158,960 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 53,660 33,420 33,420 5504-Interfund Allocation 16,290 0 0 Total Division: 303 1,090,340 849,610 788,230 Total For Fund 151: 1,090,340 849,610 788,230 SLD#2 RESIDENTIAL(152) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5403 -Electric Utilities 268,670 278,170 250,340 5500-Assessment Administration 38,440 36,330 36,330 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 24,870 2,150 2,150 Total Division: 303 331,980 316,650 288,820 Total For Fund 152: 331,980 316,650 288,820 SLD#3 VICTORIA (153) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 22,080 13,170 13,170 5010-Part Time Salaries 12,700 13,340 13,340 5030-Fringe Benefits 11,780 8,110 8,110 5102-Training 180 180 180 5160-Membership Dues 30 30 30 5200-Operations&Maintenance 9,940 9,940 9,940 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P229 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5403 -Electric Utilities 294,920 233,800 220,890 5500-Assessment Administration 35,180 35,190 35,190 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 24,130 4,510 4,510 5504- Interfund Allocation 16,290 0 0 Total Division: 303 427,230 318,270 305,360 Total For Fund 153: 427,230 318,270 305,360 SLD#4 TERRA VISTA(154) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 22,080 13,170 13,170 5010-Part Time Salaries 12,700 13,340 13,340 5030-Fringe Benefits 11,780 8,110 8,110 5102-Training 180 180 180 5160- Membership Dues 30 30 30 5200-Operations& Maintenance 4,940 4,940 4,940 5280-Equip Operations& Maint 500 500 500 5403 -Electric Utilities 141,160 110,060 102,650 5500-Assessment Administration 22,970 22,990 22,990 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 11,110 3,380 3,380 5650-Capital Project 0 0 26,290 Total Division: 303 227,450 176,700 195,580 Total For Fund 154: 227,450 176,700 195,580 SLD#5 CARYN COMMUNITY(155) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 6,900 4,140 4,140 5030- Fringe Benefits 3,240 1,950 1,950 5102-Training 180 180 180 5160-Membership Dues 30 30 30 5200-Operations&Maintenance 7,440 7,440 7,440 5403 -Electric Utilities 54,900 44,530 41,640 5500-Assessment Administration 7,020 7,020 7,020 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 3,100 1,130 1,130 Total Division: 303 82,810 66,420 63,530 Total For Fund 155: 82,810 66,420 63,530 SLD#6 INDUSTRIAL AREA (156) 303 - ENGINEERING- ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 22,080 13,170 13,170 5010-Part Time Salaries 12,700 13,340 13,340 5030- Fringe Benefits 11,780 8,110 8,110 5102-Training 180 180 180 5160-Membership Dues 30 30 30 5200-Operations&Maintenance 6,940 6,940 6,940 5280-Equip Operations& Maint 400 400 400 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P230 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5403 -Electric Utilities 94,790 80,600 75,570 5500-Assessment Administration 5,490 5,530 5,530 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 8,990 2,960 2,960 Total Division: 303 163,380 131,260 126,230 Total For Fund 156: 163,380 131,260 126,230 SLD#7 NORTH ETIWANDA (157) 303 - ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 22,080 13,170 13,170 5010- Part Time Salaries 12,700 13,340 13,340 5030-Fringe Benefits 11,780 8,110 8,110 5102-Training 180 I80 180 5160- Membership Dues 30 30 30 5200-Operations&Maintenance 4,940 4,940 4,940 5300-Contract Services 14,670 0 0 5403 - Electric Utilities 201,320 153,160 140,320 5500-Assessment Administration 17,170 19,830 19,830 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 7,180 3,640 3,640 5504 - Interfund Allocation 16,290 0 0 Total Division: 303 308,340 216,400 203,560 Total For Fund 157: 308,340 216,400 203,560 SLD#8 SOUTH ETIWANDA(158) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 20,700 11,780 11,780 5010-Part Time Salaries 12,700 13,340 13,340 5030-Fringe Benefits 11,130 7,460 7,460 5102-Training 180 180 180 5160-Membership Dues 30 30 30 5200-Operations& Maintenance 4,940 4,940 4,940 5300-Contract Services 14,670 0 0 5403 - Electric Utilities 66,540 53,860 51,150 5500- Assessment Administration 9,390 9,390 9,390 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 8,980 3,200 3,200 5504- Interfund Allocation 16,290 0 0 5650-Capital Project 0 0 36,220 Total Division: 303 165,550 104,180 137,690 Total For Fund 158: 165,550 104,180 137,690 GAS TAX 2105/PROPI 11 (170) 303- ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 260,750 209,760 184,140 5030- Fringe Benefits 120,750 96,740 84,700 5215 -O& M/Computer Equipment 0 360 180 5250-Vehicle Operations&Maint. 610 610 610 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P231 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5300-Contract Services 268,600 268,600 374,500 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 24,500 24,500 5650-Capital Project 0 500,000 500,000 Total Division: 303 650,710 1,100,570 1,168,630 Total For Fund 170: 650,710 1,100,570 1,168,630 GAS TAX 2106-2107 (172) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 771,660 767,410 749,680 5005-Overtime Salaries 10,500 10,500 10,500 5010- Pan Time Salaries 88,340 88,340 88,340 5030- Fringe Benefits 370,030 371,050 365,090 5200-Operations& Maintenance 12,080 4,580 4,580 5250-Vehicle Operations&Maint. 7,500 7,500 7,500 5280- Equip Operations&Maint 2,200 2,200 2,200 5300-Contract Services 7,500 7,500 7,500 5403 - Electric Utilities 810,000 870,750 750,000 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 6,690 6,690 Total Division: 303 2,079,810 2,136,520 1,992,080 Total For Fund 172: 2,079,810 2,136,520 1,992,080 GAS TAX R&T7360(174) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5300-Contract Services 0 0 25,000 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 10 10 5650-Capital Project 1,250,000 1,608,200 1,272,360 9157-Transfer Out-Fund 157 0 0 84,610 Total Division: 303 1,250,000 1,608,210 1,381,980 Total For Fund 174: 1,250,000 1,608,210 1,381,980 MEASURE 1 1990-2010(176) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5650-Capital Project 672,000 0 352,400 Total Division: 303 672,000 0 352,400 Total For Fund 176: 672,000 0 352,400 MEASURE 12010-2040(177) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 277,980 249,890 258,480 5030-Fringe Benefits 129,120 115,880 121,490 5215-O& M/Computer Equipment 0 180 90 5300-Contract Services .918,810 1,018,810 1,028,940 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 31,140 31,140 5650-Capital Project 866,200 1,958,000 1,428,440 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P232 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 303 2,192,110 3,373,900 2,868,580 Total For Fund 177: 2,192,110 3,373,900 2,868,580 FOOTHILL BLVD MAINTENANCE(186) 316-STREET AND PARK MAINT. 5000-Regular Salaries 20,990 21,050 21,050 5030- Fringe Benefits 9,750 9,890 9,890 5200-Operations& Maintenance 10,000 0 0 5250-Vehicle Operations& Maint. 5,000 0 0 5252- Emergency Equipment& Veh Rod 2,500 0 0 5255 -Gasoline 3,000 0 0 5280-Equip Operations&Maint 2,000 0 0 5300-Contract Services 20,350 0 0 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 2,280 2,280 Total Division: 316 73,590 33,220 33,220 Total For Fund 186: 73,590 33,220 33,220 INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT(188) 313 - INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT. 5000-Regular Salaries 607,300 473,860 473,860 5005 -Overtime Salaries 65,000 40,000 54,000 5030- Fringe Benefits 279,790 219,160 219,160 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,500 1,500 1,500 5102-Training 500 500 500 5105 -Mileage 100 100 100 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 2,000 2,000 2,000 5160-Membership Dues 920 920 920 5200-Operations&Maintenance 59,500 59,500 58,750 5300-Contract Services 40,000 40,000 40,750 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 75,000 73,470 73,470 5650-Capital Project 17,000 45,520 1,197,750 Total Division: 313 1,148,610 956,530 2,122,760 Total For Fund 188: 1,148,610 956,530 2,122,760 PROP 42-TRAFFIC CONGESTION MIT(190) 303- ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 370 370 5650-Capital Project 733,700 697,000 1,364,900 5725 -Other Expenditures 0 0 210,000 Total Division: 303 733,700 697,370 1,575,270 Total For Fund 190: 733,700 697,370 1,575,270 BICYCLE TRANSPORT ACCT GRANT(192) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P233 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 303 0 0 0 PROPOSITION 1B STATE FUNDING (194) 303 - ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 430 430 5650-Capital Project 0 125,300 0 5725 -Other Expenditures 0 0 62,500 Total Division: 303 0 125,730 62,930 Total For Fund 194: 0 125,730 62,930 STATE ASSET SEIZURE(195) 701 -POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5200-Operations& Maintenance 0 0 50,000 5300-Contract Services 0 19,760 19,760 5603-Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 146,140 0 5605 -Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 0 0 34,980 Total Division: 701 0 165,900 104,740 Total For Fund 195: 0 165,900 104,740 CA ASSET SEIZURE 15% (196) 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5300-Contract Services 0 10,240 10,240 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 10 10 Total Division: 701 0 10,250 10,250 Total For Fund 196: 0 10,250 10,250 FEDERAL ASSET SEIZURE (197) 701 -POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 60 60 Total Division: 701 0 60 60 Total For Fund 197: 0 60 60 CITYWIDE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPRV(198) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 480 480 5650-Capital Project 0 338,000 6,834,290 Total Division: 303 0 338,480 6,834,770 Total For Fund 198: 0 338,480 6,834,770 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BILK GRIST(204) 314- PLANNING 5000- Regular Salaries 312,000 279,200 275,700 5010-Part Time Salaries 7,750 6,550 6,550 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P234 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5030-Fringe Benefits 146,530 131,660 130,520 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 22,720 22,720 5650-Capital Project 1,565,450 594,450 592,390 Total Division: 314 2,031,730 1,034,580 1,027,880 Total For Fund 204: 2,031,730 1,034,580 1,027,880 PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3(214) 303 - ENGINEERING- ADMINISTRATION 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 80 80 5650-Capital Project 0 215,880 90,880 Total Division: 303 0 215,960 90,960 Total For Fund 214: 0 215,960 90,960 ENRGY EFFICNCY/CONSRVATN GRNT(215) 314-PLANNING 5010-Part Time Salaries 16,650 3,810 7,830 5030- Fringe Benefits 1,830 550 1,170 5650-Capital Project 18,480 4,370 4,370 Total Division: 314 36,960 8,730 13,370 Total For Fund 215: 36,960 8,730 13,370 PUBLIC RESRCE GRNTS/HEALTHY RC(218) 102-CITY MANAGEMENT 5000- Regular Salaries 0 14,440 28,400 5010- Part Time Salaries 30,960 0 3,000 5030-Fringe Benefits 3,410 6,790 13,390 5100-Travel and Meetings 5,000 11,400 11,400 5152-Computer Software 0 0 290 5200-Operations&Maintenance 10,000 30,930 133,000 5300-Contract Services 80,000 93,540 98,540 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 0 790 790 Total Division: 102 129,370 157,890 288,810 Total For Fund 218: 129,370 157,890 288,810 CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT(225) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5005 -Overtime Salaries 0 2,930 3,430 5100-Travel and Meetings 2,500 2,350 2,350 5102-Training 1,600 1,600 1,600 5200-Operations&Maintenance 5,900 25,000 25,950 5300-Contract Services 12,000 12,000 12,000 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 140 140 Total Division: 303 22,000 44,020 45,470 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P235 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 225: 22,000 44,020 45,470 USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT(226) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5005 -Overtime Salaries 11,000 0 0 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,500 0 0 5102-Training 500 0 0 5200-Operations&Maintenance 7,500 0 0 Total Division: 303 20,500 0 0 Total For Fund 226: 20,500 0 0 USED OIL RECYCLING PROGRAM (227) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5005-Overtime Salaries 0 15,000 20,000 5100-Travel and Meetings 0 1,000 1,000 5102-Training 0 480 480 5200-Operations&Maintenance 0 32,640 37,640 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 140 140 Total Division: 303 0 49,260 59,260 Total For Fund 227: 0 49,260 59,260 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM (234) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 0 43,310 43,310 5030-Fringe Benefits 0 20,360 20,360 5100-Travel and Meetings 0 1,500 1,500 5200-Operations&Maintenance 0 35,000 55,000 5300-Contract Services 114,800 52,270 15,000 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 9,550 9,550 5650-Capital Project 0 316,790 445,790 Total Division: 303 114,800 478,780 590,510 Total For Fund 234: 114,800 478,780 590,510 PROP 84 PARK BOND ACT(235) 305 - ENGINEERING- DEVELOPMENT MGT 5650-Capital Project 0 283,500 0 Total Division: 305 0 283,500 0 Total For Fund 235: 0 283,500 0 RECREATION SERVICES (250) 401 -COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 629,010 631,400 614,400 5005-Overtime Salaries 1,000 1,000 1,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P236 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5010- Part Time Salaries 1,556,520 1,580,780 1,580,780 5030- Fringe Benefits 389,110 405,330 397,340 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 5,670 5,370 6,020 5160- Membership Dues 0 450 0 5200-Operations& Maintenance 449,740 450,660 452,840 5300-Contract Services 1,652,550 1,571,980 1,482,430 5304-Contract Serv/Facilities 0 7,000 7,000 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 41,010 41,010 5503 -City Facilities Allocation 13,350 0 0 5509-Information Srvcs Allocation 10,730 0 0 5602-Capital Outlay-Bldg& Imprvmnt 0 90,000 0 5605 -Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 0 5,760 5,760 Total Division: 401 4,707,680 4,790,740 4,588,580 Total For Fund 250: 4,707,680 4,790,740 4,588,580 SENIOR OUTREACH GRANT(258) 401 -COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 5300-Contract Services 7,500 0 6,920 Total Division: 401 7,500 0 6,920 Total For Fund 258: 7,500 0 6,920 COUNTY SENIOR TRANSPORT.GRANT(271) Total Division: 401 0 0 0 LIBRARY FUND(290) 601 - LIBRARY-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 295,790 326,910 321,910 5010-Part Time Salaries 0 17,190 17,190 5030-Fringe Benefits 132,820 149,920 147,570 5100-Travel and Meetings 6,000 6,500 6,500 5102-Training 2,000 2,000 2,000 5105 - Mileage 1,000 1,300 1,300 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 2,000 3,000 3,000 5160-Membership Dues 3,100 3,240 3,250 5200-Operations&Maintenance 7,000 8,000 8,000 5220-Cellular Technology 600 600 600 5300-Contract Services 82,500 88,070 88,300 5400-Telephone Utilities 12,000 10,000 10,000 5402-Water Utilities 3,600 4,500 4,500 5403 -Electric Utilities 70,950 70,050 65,700 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 189,000 70,910 70,910 5503 -City Facilities Allocation 11,740 0 0 5605 -Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 0 5,760 22,110 5703 -Capital Lease Payment 0 0 730 9298 -Transfer Out-CA Literacy Cmpgn 83,690 0 8,210 Total Division: 601 903,790 767,950 781,780 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P237 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 603 -LITERACY SERVICES 5000-Regular Salaries 32,570 32,570 32,570 5010-Part Time Salaries 30,000 10,000 10,000 5030-Fringe Benefits 15,910 16,750 16,750 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 2,500 2,500 2,500 5200-Operations&Maintenance 4,000 4,000 4,000 5300-Contract Services 500 500 500 Total Division: 603 85,480 66,320 66,320 604-BOOKMOBILE SERVICES 5000-Regular Salaries 59,170 59,170 59,330 5010- Part Time Salaries 20,600 20,600 20,600 5030-Fringe Benefits 29,150 30,780 30,780 5105-Mileage 100 100 100 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 500 500 500 5200-Operations&Maintenance 4,000 4,000 4,000 5220-Cellular Technology 1,500 1,010 1,010 Total Division: 604 115,020 116,160 116,320 605 -LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES 5100-Travel and Meetings 1,200 1,200 1,200 5160-Membership Dues 500 500 500 Total Division: 605 1,700 1,700 1,700 606-ARCHIBALD LIBRARY 5000-Regular Salaries 469,740 479,600 471,600 5010-Part Time Salaries 318,130 301,910 301,910 5030-Fringe Benefits 239,770 247,680 245,610 5100-Travel and Meetings 2,000 2,000 2,000 5105 -Mileage 200 200 200 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 7,500 7,500 7,500 5152-Computer Software 1,000 1,000 1,000 5160- Membership Dues 450 450 450 5200-Operations&Maintenance 185,240 187,740 187,740 5300-Contract Services 93,320 87,350 113,140 5703 -Capital Lease Payment 0 0 1,220 Total Division: 606 1,317,350 1,315,430 1,332,370 607- PAUL A. BIANE LIBRARY 5000-Regular Salaries 546,370 559,710 559,710 5010-Part Time Salaries 344,920 328,700 328,700 5030-Fringe Benefits 279,210 289,140 289,140 5100-Travel and Meetings 4,000 4,000 4,000 5105 -Mileage 300 300 300 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 10,000 10,000 10,000 5152 -Computer Software 3,000 3,000 3,000 5160-Membership Dues 730 730 800 5200-Operations&Maintenance 228,240 230,740 230,740 5300-Contract Services 86,500 86,500 86,380 5703 -Capital Lease Payment 0 0 1,220 Total Division: 607 1,503,270 1,512,820 1,513,990 608 - VIRTUAL LIBRARY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P238 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES . 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget - Budget Budget 5000- Regular Salaries 28,300 28,300 23,200 5030-Fringe Benefits 13,300 13,300 10,900 5152-Computer Software 2,000 2,000 6,000 5200-Operations&Maintenance 0 97,000 97,000 5300-Contract Services 4,000 4,000 0 Total Division: 608 47,600 144,600 137,100 Total For Fund 290: 3,974,210 3,924,980 3,949,580 CA STATE LIBRARY(291) 602-GRANT MANAGEMENT 5010- Part Time Salaries 12,730 0 24,450 5030-Fringe Benefits 250 0 1,830 5100-Travel and Meetings 8,000 0 8,000 5200-Operations& Maintenance 18,000 6,590 8,150 5300-Contract Services 10,000 0 3,400 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 20 20 Total Division: 602 48,980 6,610 45,850 Total For Fund 291: 48,980 6,610 45,850 STAFF INNOVATION FD(CA ST LB)(292) 602-GRANT MANAGEMENT 5010- Part Time Salaries 0 8,250 16,380 5030-Fringe Benefits 0 710 1,420 5100-Travel and Meetings 0 2,500 19,430 5200-Operations&Maintenance 0 3,000 81,090 5300-Contract Services 0 1,890 9,460 Total Division: 602 0 16,350 127,780 Total For Fund 292: 0 16,350 127,780 CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN (298) 601 - LIBRARY-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 56,880 0 0 5010- Part Time Salaries 17,190 0 0 5030-Fringe Benefits 26,930 0 0 5100-Travel and Meetings 500 0 0 5105 - Mileage 300 0 0 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 1,000 0 0 5160-Membership Dues 140 0 0 5200-Operations&Maintenance 1,000 0 0 5300-Contract Services 1,310 0 0 Total Division: 601 105,250 0 0 Total For Fund 298: 105,250 0 0 THE BIG READ LIBRARY GRANT(301) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P239 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 602-GRANT MANAGEMENT 5010-Part Time Salaries 0 0 700 5030-Fringe Benefits 0 0 50 5200-Operations&Maintenance 0 7,500 8,750 5300-Contract Services 0 7,500 2,500 Total Division: 602 0 15,000 12,000 Total For Fund 301: 0 15,000 12,000 LIBRARY SERVICES&TECH.ACT(302) 601 - LIBRARY-ADMINISTRATION 5200-Operations& Maintenance 0 0 9,000 5300-Contract Services 0 3,000 3,000 Total Division: 601 0 3,000 12,000 Total For Fund 302: 0 3,000 12,000 COP'S PROGRAM GRANT-STATE (354) 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5300-Contract Services 400,000 400,000 200,000 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 1,200 1,200 Total Division: 701 400,000 401,200 201,200 Total For Fund 354: 400,000 401,200 201,200 JUSTICE ASSIST GRNT(JAG)ARRA(356) 701 -POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 20 20 5603 -Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 0 176,690 Total Division: 701 0 20 176,710 Total For Fund 356: 0 20 176,710 JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT(JAG)(361) 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5300-Contract Services 0 0 15,880 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 260 260 5603 -Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 0 36,930 Total Division: 701 0 260 53,070 Total For Fund 361: 0 260 53,070 COPS SECURE OUR SCHOOLS GRANT(373) 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5005 -Overtime Salaries 7,470 2,500 12,500 5010-Part Time Salaries 57,720 0 0 5030- Fringe Benefits 6,350 0 0 5102-Training 10,350 650 2,550 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P240 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5200-Operations&Maintenance 12,720 220 220 5215 -0& M/Computer Equipment 2,000 0 0 5300-Contract Services 2,250 4,750 19,150 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 9,880 9,880 5605 -Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 10,000 0 6,140 Total Division: 701 108,860 18,000 50,440 Total For Fund 373: 108,860 18,000 50,440 COPS HIRING PROGRAM GRANT(374) 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5300-Contract Services 0 0 102,460 Total Division: 701 0 0 102,460 Total For Fund 374: 0 0 102,460 DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT(380) 501 - FIRE ADMINISTRATION 5010- Part Time Salaries 37,200 37,200 24,000 5030-Fringe Benefits 740 740 350 5102-Training 0 0 20,000 5152-Computer Software 0 0 10,000 5207 -0& M/Capital Supplies 0 0 45,000 5300-Contract Services 0 0 5,000 Total Division: 501 37,940 37,940 104,350 Total For Fund 380: 37,940 37,940 104,350 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 2005(381) 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5604-Capital Outlay-Vehicles 0 0 81,310 Total Division: 701 0 0 81,310 Total For Fund 381: 0 0 81,310 AD 84-1 DAY CREEK/MELLO(602) 203 -ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 150 150 Total Division: 203 0 150 150 Total For Fund 602: 0 150 150 CFD 2001-01 (612) 303 -ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 70 70 Total Division: 303 . 0 70 70 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P241 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 612: 0 70 70 CFD 2003-01 CULTURAL CENTER(615) Total Division: 303 0 0 0 CFD 2004-01 RANCHO ETIWANDA ES(617) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5650-Capital Project 500,000 500,000 500,000 Total Division: 303 500,000 500,000 500,000 Total For Fund 617: 500,000 500,000 500,000 CFD 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE(680) 303 -ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5650-Capital Project 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total Division: 303 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total For Fund 680: 100,000 100,000 100,000 SPORTS COMPLEX(700) 201 -ADMIN SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 401,470 410,650 405,150 5005 -Overtime Salaries 34,650 34,650 34,650 5010-Part Time Salaries 161,470 138,740 138,740 5030- Fringe Benefits 206,450 212,920 210,420 5203 -O&M/Complex Maintenance 34,000 34,000 34,000 5204-O&M/Facilities 50,600 49,800 49,800 5252-Emergency Equipment& Veh Rntl 2,500 2,500 2,500 5280- Equip Operations& Maint 2,000 4,000 4,000 5300-Contract Services 66,940 66,940 44,710 5302 -Contract Serv/Complex Maint. 5,000 3,000 3,000 5304-Contract Serv/Facilities 171,420 182,920 182,920 5400-Telephone Utilities 3,010 4,010 4,010 5401 -Gas Utilities 12,400 9,450 9,450 5402 -Water Utilities 110,570 83,430 86,240 5403 -Electric Utilities 269,000 269,000 285,280 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 20,000 20,000 Total Division: 201 1,531,480 1,526,010 1,514,870 401 -COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 5000-Regular Salaries 85,370 85,550 84,350 5010-Part Time Salaries 101,660 103,410 100,910 5030- Fringe Benefits 47,800 49,360 48,560 5150-Office Supplies& Equipment 600 600 600 5206-O&M/Recreation Programs 37,430 37,430 37,630 5305 -Contract Serv/Recreation Prgs 86,060 92,960 92,960 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 5,000 5,000 Total Division: 401 358,920 374,310 370,010 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P242 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 700: 1,890,400 1,900,320 1,884,880 MUNICIPAL UTILITY(705) 303 -ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 212,370 191,110 192,150 5010- Part Time Salaries 0 0 20,000 5030-Fringe Benefits 97,400 87,760 90,960 5100-Travel and Meetings 5,350 6,350 6,850 5102-Training 42,000 42,000 42,000 5150-Office Supplies&Equipment 1,000 1,000 1,000 5152-Computer Software 12,960 61,830 32,370 5160-Membership Dues 8,680 11,470 12,200 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 2,350 2,350 1,350 5209-0&M/Electric Utility 7,155,300 6,955,300 6,955,300 5215-O&M/Computer Equipment 7,610 6,610 7,010 5309-Contract Srvc/Electric Utility 758,670 547,200 572,050 5312-Legal Services 40,000 40,000 40,000 5400-Telephone Utilities 7,500 7,500 7,500 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 110,540 110,540 5509- Information Srvcs Allocation 1,300 0 0 5603 -Capital Outlay-Equipment 82,000 82,000 82,000 5605 -Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 31,440 0 0 5650-Capital Project 60,000 60,000 105,090 9001 -Transfer Out-General Fund 942,400 942,400 942,400 Total Division: 303 9,468,330 9,155,420 9,220,770 Total For Fund 705: 9,468,330 9,155,420 9,220,770 UTILITY PUBLIC BENEFIT FUND (706) 303 -ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 73,000 76,770 76,980 5030-Fringe Benefits 33,610 35,380 35,480 5160-Membership Dues 3,300 3,400 3,500 5161 -Publications&Subscriptions 0 200 200 5209-O&M/Electric Utility 320,000 300,000 300,000 5300-Contract Services 85,000 105,000 30,000 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 3,810 3,810 Total Division: 303 514,910 524,560 449,970 Total For Fund 706: 514,910 524,560 449,970 EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT(712) 001 -NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 5165 - Licenses, Permits&Fees 10,000 10,000 10,000 5200-Operations&Maintenance 38,970 42,940 122,560 5300-Contract Services 287,580 235,330 196,520 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 3,240 3,240 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P243 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5603 -Capital Outlay-Equipment 384,000 259,300 132,480 5604-Capital Outlay-Vehicles 74,000 168,000 204,050 5703 -Capital Lease Payment 0 0 20,740 Total Division: 001 794,550 718,810 689,590 Total For Fund 712: 794,550 718,810 689,590 COMP EQUIP/TECH REPLCMENT FUND (714) 001 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 5102-Training 15,000 34,500 39,500 5152-Computer Software 181,580 217,000 235,250 5161 -Publications& Subscriptions 35,000 35,000 35,000 5200-Operations& Maintenance 17,920 5,800 71,970 5215 -O& M/Computer Equipment 453,050 258,290 336,830 5300-Contract Services 203,260 277,100 712,210 5501 -Admin,/General Overhead 0 1,230 1,230 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 267,420 362,680 104,010 5703 -Capital Lease Payment 0 0 65,470 Total Division: 001 1,173,230 1,191,600 1,601,470 Total For Fund 714: 1,173,230 1,191,600 1,601,470 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND DEBT(812) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5330- Payment to Trustee 1,000 1,000 1,000 5500-Assessment Administration 15,630 15,630 15,630 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 34,010 7,830 7,830 5700- Interest Expense 105,550 97,300 97,300 5701 -Principal Repayments 130,000 135,000 135,000 9815 -Transfer Out-AD 88-2 Police 700 700 700 Total Division: 203 286,890 257,460 257,460 Total For Fund 812: 286,890 257,460 257,460 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND IMPR(813) 203 -ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 0 230 230 5650-Capital Project 500,000 50,000 50,000 Total Division: 203 500,000 50,230 50,230 Total For Fund 813: 500,000 50,230 50,230 CFD 2004-01 REDEMPTION (820) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300-Contract Services 11,500 11,500 11,500 5330-Payment to Trustee 2,000 2,000 2,000 5500-Assessment Administration 25,000 25,000 39,440 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 15,000 560 560 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P244 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5700- Interest Expense 2,063,760 2,026,900 2,026,900 5701 -Principal Repayments 810,000 810,000 892,400 Total Division: 203 2,927,260 2,875,960 2,972,800 Total For Fund 820: 2,927,260 2,875,960 2,972,800 AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON(838) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5000-Regular Salaries 29,340 30,840 30,340 5030-Fringe Benefits 13,450 14,160 13,920 5500-Assessment Administration 1,930 1,930 1,930 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 2,260 4,640 4,640 Total Division: 203 46,980 51,570 50,830 Total For Fund 838: 46,980 51,570 50,830 AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER(841) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300-Contract Services 1,500 1,500 1,500 5330- Payment to Trustee 1,000 1,000 1,000 5500-Assessment Administration 3,390 3,390 3,390 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 1,760 100 100 5700- Interest Expense 120,080 112,840 112,840 5701 - Principal Repayments 115,000 125,000 125,000 Total Division: 203 242,730 243,830 243,830 Total For Fund 841: 242,730 243,830 243,830 CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE (842) 203 -ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5330- Payment to Trustee 1,000 1,000 1,000 5500-Assessment Administration 13,340 13,340 13,340 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 22,230 260 260 5700-Interest Expense 176,940 162,970 162,970 5701 - Principal Repayments 215,000 225,000 225,000 Total Division: 203 428,510 402,570 402,570 Total For Fund 842: 428,510 402,570 402,570 PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND (848) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5000- Regular Salaries 534,860 528,210 528,210 5005 -Overtime Salaries 3,680 3,680 3,680 5010- Part Time Salaries 26,160 52,320 52,320 5030- Fringe Benefits 253,570 254,880 254,880 5200-Operations& Maintenance 119,750 119,750 124,750 5204-0& M/Facilities 5,000 5,000 5,000 5250-Vehicle Operations&Maint. 1,000 1,000 1,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P245 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5252- Emergency Equipment&Veh Rntl 3,000 3,000 3,000 5280- Equip Operations& Maint 10,000 10,000 10,000 5300-Contract Services 33,370 33,380 33,520 5310-Tree Maintenance 18,200 18,200 18,200 5400-Telephone Utilities 6,250 8,090 8,090 5402-Water Utilities 222,980 248,320 248,320 5403 - Electric Utilities 117,440 117,440 117,440 5500-Assessment Administration 152,550 152,550 152,550 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 78,420 115,780 115,780 5607-Cap Outlay-Impry Oth Than Bldg 75,000 0 40,140 5650-Capital Project 0 0 3,800 Total Division: 303 1,661,230 1,671,600 1,720,680 Total For Fund 848: 1,661,230 1,671,600 1,720,680 CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RDMPTN (852) 303 - ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 5300-Contract Services 1,500 1,500 1,500 5330-Payment to Trustee 2,300 2,300 2,300 5500-Assessment Administration 8,290 12,000 19,850 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 5,530 150 150 5700- Interest Expense 62,570 25,160 25,160 5701 -Principal Repayments 45,000 65,000 65,000 Total Division: 303 125,190 106,110 113,960 Total For Fund 852: 125,190 106,110 113,960 AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION(854) 203 -ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300-Contract Services 1,500 0 0 5330-Payment to Trustee 2,000 0 0 5500-Assessment Administration 10,000 10,000 10,000 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 5,170 190 190 5700- Interest Expense 27,430 9,380 9,380 5701 -Principal Repayments 280,000 300,000 300,000 Total Division: 203 326,100 319,570 319,570 Total For Fund 854: 326,100 319,570 319,570 CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RDMP(856) 203 -ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300-Contract Services 1,500 1,500 1,500 5330- Payment to Trustee 2,300 2,300 2,300 5500-Assessment Administration 19,630 33,000 54,650 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 26,570 350 350 5650-Capital Project 0 401,360 401,360 5700- Interest Expense 349,460 220,880 220,880 5701 - Principal Repayments 195,000 263,000 263,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P246 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 203 594,460 922,390 944,040 Total For Fund 856: 594,460 922,390 944,040 CFD 2000-03 RANCHO SUMMIT RDMP(858) 203 -ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300-Contract Services 1,500 1,500 1,500 5330-Payment to Trustee 2,000 2,000 2,000 5500-Assessment Administration 30,000 30,000 39,590 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 18,000 410 410 5700- Interest Expense 449,650 440,890 440,890 5701 -Principal Repayments 210,000 220,000 220,000 Total Division: 203 711,150 694,800 704,390 Total For Fund 858: 711,150 694,800 704,390 CFD 2001-01 SERIES A REDMPTION (860) 203 -ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300-Contract Services 1,500 1,500 1,500 5330-Payment to Trustee 1,750 1,750 1,750 5500-Assessment Administration 30,000 59,660 59,660 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 20,000 340 340 5700- Interest Expense 769,500 422,640 422,640 5701 - Principal Repayments 310,000 352,000 352,000 Total Division: 203 1,132,750 837,890 837,890 Total For Fund 860: 1,132,750 837,890 837,890 CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION (862) 203 -ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300-Contract Services 1,500 0 0 5330-Payment to Trustee 1,750 0 0 5500-Assessment Administration 5,000 0 0 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 5,000 90 90 5700-Interest Expense 57,570 38,650 38,650 5701 - Principal Repayments 20,000 10,000 10,000 Total Division: 203 90,820 48,740 48,740 Total For Fund 862: 90,820 48,740 48,740 CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN (864) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300-Contract Services 1,500 1,500 1,500 5330-Payment to Trustee 2,000 2,000 2,000 5500-Assessment Administration 25,000 25,000 47,420 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 15,000 380 380 5700-Interest Expense 919,360 913,120 913,120 5701 -Principal Repayments 105,000 130,000 130,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P247 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 203 1,067,860 1,072,000 1,094,420 Total For Fund 864: 1,067,860 1,072,000 1,094,420 CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN(866) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300-Contract Services 1,500 1,500 1,500 5330- Payment to Trustee 2,000 2,000 2,000 5500-Assessment Administration 3,700 3,700 11,870 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 3,000 80 80 5700-Interest Expense 175,600 174,440 174,440 5701 -Principal Repayments 20,000 25,000 25,000 Total Division: 203 205,800 206,720 214,890 Total For Fund 866: 205,800 206,720 214,890 CFD 2000-03 PARK MAINTENANCE(868) 203 -ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5000-Regular Salaries 184,020 206,960 203,960 5030-Fringe Benefits 86,170 96,850 95,860 5200-Operations&Maintenance 25,000 29,000 27,500 5204-O&M/Facilities 4,000 4,000 4,000 5280-Equip Operations&Maint 0 0 1,500 5300-Contract Services 41,090 41,100 40,990 5400-Telephone Utilities 1,050 1,050 1,050 5402-Water Utilities 14,310 18,220 18,220 5403 -Electric Utilities 2,250 2,250 2,560 5500-Assessment Administration 1,980 1,980 1,980 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 24,310 43,080 43,080 5604-Capital Outlay-Vehicles 4,620 0 0 5607-Cap Outlay-Impry Oth Than Bldg 0 21,200 21,200 Total Division: 203 388,800 465,690 461,900 Total For Fund 868: 388,800 465,690 461,900 CFD 2006-01 REDEMPTION(869) 203 -ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300-Contract Services 2,500 2,500 2,500 5330-Payment to Trustee 2,000 2,000 2,000 5500-Assessment Administration 15,000 15,000 24,780 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 10,000 220 220 5700-Interest Expense 266,860 262,110 262,110 5701 -Principal Repayments 111,000 115,000 115,000 Total Division: 203 407,360 396,830 406,610 Total For Fund 869: 407,360 396,830 406,610 CFD 2006-02 REDEMPTION (871) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P248 FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2011/12 Fiscal Year 2012/13 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 203 -ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300-Contract Services 2,000 2,000 2,000 5330- Payment to Trustee 2,000 2,000 2,000 5500-Assessment Administration 15,000 15,000 24,800 5501 -Admin./General Overhead 10,000 200 200 5700- Interest Expense 136,530 133,990 133,990 5701 -Principal Repayments 60,000 60,000 60,000 Total Division: 203 225,530 213,190 222,990 Total For Fund 871: 225,530 213,190 222,990 Total for CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: 139,180,470 135,683,190 150,217,610 P249 STAFF REPORT ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John Gillison, City Manager From: Veronica Fincher, Animal Services Director Subject: Approval to receive and file Animal Center statistics for February and March 2013 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the Animal Center statistics for February and March 2013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Animal Center tracks monthly statistics as a means of monitoring our Center's operations. In the months of February and March 2013, the Animal Center impounded and cared for 605 dogs and cats and 48 small mammals and birds. Of the dogs and cats, 295 were adopted, 58 were placed with rescue or adoption partners, 93 were reunited with their owners, 29 cats were spayed or neutered and returned to caregivers in our trap neuter and return (TNR) program and 46 kittens and puppies were placed into volunteer foster homes to be given more specialized care prior to adoption. Our average euthanasia rate for the two months was 10.4% which includes those animals that were euthanized at the request of their owners due to terminal illnesses and/or irremediable suffering as determined by a licensed Veterinarian. Some program highlights for the months of February and March included our first annual Open House, Operation Cat Nip (where 54 community cats were spayed or neutered for free from funds raised by the Animal Center fundraising committee) and the Crown Your Pet adoption day (hosted by Crown Toyota) where 10 dogs and cats were adopted from the event. Respectful submitted, UIu Veronica Fincher Animal Services Director Attachments: Animal Center Statistics for February and March 2013 May 1,2013 City Council Meeting-Item L16.Approval to receive and file Animal Center statistics P249 - 1 for February and March 2013.Page 249-1,month of February, was inadvertently skipped during the printing of the Agenda. City of Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Adoption Center Month of Februaty 2013 Assist Police,Fim,Other Officer 5 Deceased Animal Pick Up 66 Investipte Bark • 27 RANCHO Investigate Neglect II Ct,cnMONCA investigate Other(Inv.Bite,Inv.Along tar.Tethering Mont Viohtiow) 75 ,* ,,r-s•.. • -. •'. A s . Stray(respond to aggresuve and free roaming animals) 106 4 Wild Animals 9 • 144: as e . ,; Other(leash law violations,patrol,quarantines,rescue,adman) 226 -w iia 1� ' j � a C. Total Field Calls ... ':'Mlmal Licenses Soldt 1 -Dog Licenses _ 9921 " "MiinaliCepter Statistics DOG "lI I „.CAT, Total Mimah= ]Shelter count as ofFebtuaty 1,2013 122 I 52 —I 174 Intake(Live Animal) T B. From Public(stray or abandoned) 153 69 222 C. From Owner/Guardian 12 5 17 D. Adoption Returns 5 2 7 E. Returned from Foster Care 3 9 12 E Other(Boni at Center,Transferred to Center from other S 0 0 0 G. Owner Requested Euthanasia 5 l 1 6 H. Total Intake,` `- - _ 1701 .86• - '264 i Outcome 1 Adoptions I 92 45 137 1. TNR or Relocate(Feral Cats,Sam Cats) 0 16 16 K. Transfer to Correct Animal Shelter(jurisdiction) 0 0 0 L. Sent t o Foster Home _ 4 I I 15 M. Rescue Penner 24 1 25 N. Reunited with Owner 41 4 45 O:ijTotal Ll OYt .. .. • - 4151 . ,M: . . 430, Euthaniud P. Medical(age,injured,sick) 4 12 1 16 _ Q. Other(aggressive,unadoptable,behavior,space,feral) 6 0 I 6 It Owner Requested Euthanasia 4 1 I 5 si;Ta`al EntluaiNa :41 .14` 73 .27., , T. Died,Escaped,or Missing 1 0 1 U. Inventory Error(Duplicate ID Numbers) 0 0 — 0 V. Euthanasia Rate=Sill 7.9% 151% 10.2% W. Ending Shelter Count as of February 28,2013 124 48 172 _ • •Additionally,the Animal Center impounded 25 birds and other small mammals of which 2 were adopted,rescued or released back into the wild. P250 City Of Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Adoption Center Month of March 2013 ,Field OM"r Calh Assist Police,Fite,Otha Officer 1 Deceased Animal Pick U 98 Invest4tac Bark 29 _RANCHO UCAMONGA lnvesti Nceect 9 Wvcsd tle OtIMOM.Bih,Inv.Aband.Inv,Tahw4 Mmmi Violations) 93 S to awressive and Gee roaming animals) 112 ' Wild Animals 11 1 Other(leash law violations.patrol, tins.rescue,admin) 364 Taal(geld Calls 717 Anlmal licenses Sold,.. Licenses 1 118 ".rAoioul Cegte—rStadYtlea 'DOG. CAT Total'Animals A. Sheller count as of March 1,2013 124 48 172 Intake(Live Animal) B. From Public(stray or abandoned) 170 98 268 C From Owner/Guardian 27 d 31 D. Adoption Returns 12 4 16 E. Returned from Foster Care 2 12 14 F. Other at Center,Tranall rred to Center from other Shelter) 2 7 9 G. Owva Requested Euthanasia 3 0 3 H. Total lutake.: 216 '125 .341 Outmme 1 Adapmona 110 48 158 J. TNR or Relocate(Feral Cats,Bam Cats) 0 13 13 K Transfer to Correct Animal Shelter urisdiction) 0 0 0 L. Sent to Foster Home 6 25 31 M. Rescue Partner 20 13 33 N. Reunited with Owner 46 2 49 182- 101 283 Euthamlzed L Medicalm'ured,sick) I I t9 30 4. Other a 've,unad ble behavior e,feral 0 5 0 5 R Owner Requested Euthanasia a 1 1 S.. TotaLEuthannia lT ;19 36 NVIEuthansisia Died,Escaped,m Missing I 1 5 Invemo Fmror( kcate ID Numbers I 0 1 Rate-SM 7.9% 15.2% 10.6% W. Endi Shelter Count as of March 31,2013 139 49 188 •Additionally,the Animal Center impounded 23 birds and other small mammals of which 6 were adopted,rescued or released back into the wild. P251 STAFF REPORT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: May 1, 2013 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Subject: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REGARDING THE PAYMENT OF THE PASS THRU AGREEMENT FUND BALANCE AND A REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE EAST AVENUE STORM DRAIN RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached Agreement which provides for a reimbursement to the City for costs associated with the East Avenue storm drain project once the San Bernardino County Flood Control District receives payment for the pass thru agreement fund balance. BACKGROUND: In 1982 the City, Redevelopment Agency, County and Flood Control District (District) entered into a pass thru agreement which allowed the Agency to retain the taxes that would have otherwise gone to the County and the District. The funds were restricted to be used to construct flood control improvements that were of benefit to the City, Agency, County and District. As a result of this Agreement, Day Creek, Etiwanda and San Sevaine regional storm drain improvements have been constructed which have improved flood protection and public safety, and have enabled thousands of acres of land to be developed in the city. ANALYSIS: In 2012 as a direct result of the dissolution of redevelopment the Successor Agency no longer is allowed to receive or retain the pass thru funds. The Successor Agency must now pay to the District the fund balance it holds pursuant to the 1982 pass thru. This fund balance, which is estimated to be $12.5 million, has been included on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) and approved by the Department of Finance (DOF). The Successor Agency plans to pay the fund balance upon approval by DOF of the Other Funds Due Diligence Review (DDR) which was submitted in January 2012. Associated with the fund balance payment is the East Avenue storm drain project, and the final payments to Sully Miller, the general contractor for the project. The East Avenue storm drain project began in 2011, prior to the dissolution of redevelopment. When the Successor Agency submitted its ROPS, the East Avenue storm drain project was included. DOF initially approved the project, but it was subsequently rejected as an enforceable obligation. The District recognizes this project as one which was eligible to be constructed pursuant to the pass thru agreement. The District also recognizes the Agency committed pass thru revenues as the funding source for the East Avenue storm drain project. P252 APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT BEIAVE-EN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND PAGE 2 THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REGARDING THE PAYMENT OF THE PASS THRU AGREEMENT FUND BALANCE AND A REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE EAST AVENUE STORM DRAIN MAY 1,2013 The amount of the Sully Miller contract that was rejected by DOF is $842,583. At the time DOF rejected the balance of the Sully Miller contract, the Successor Agency had already paid Sully Miller and the project had been finished and a Notice of Completion had been filed (November 2012). Because of DOF's rejection, the DDR had to include the $842,583 in the estimated $12.5 million fund balance to be paid to the District. In order to account for DOF's rejection of the Sully Miller contract, and because the money has already been paid by the Successor Agency to the contractor, the City will have to contribute $842,583 towards the fund balance remittance to the District. The District has agreed to reimburse the City the same amount within 15 days of receiving the fund balance in order to make the City whole. Respectfully Submitted,,,,,l' Linda D. Daniels Assistant City Manager P253 ���r rlirrr FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY New FAS Vendor Code Dept. Contract Number a t ❑ Change SC A — •- \. ❑ Cancel ePro Vendor Number ePro Contract Number ,10 1-S�� Dept. Orgn. Contractor's License No. Flood Control District Contract Representative Telephone Total Contract Amount San Bernardino County Kevin Blakeslee (909)387-7917 $13,000,000.00 Flood Control District Contract Type Revenue 71 Encumbered Unencumbered F1 Other: If not encumbered or revenue contract type, provide reason: FAS Commodity Code Contract Start Date Contract End Date Original Amount Amendment Amount STANDARD CONTRACT $ $ Fund Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No Amount RFB 091 091 8161 $13,000,000.00 Fund Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No. Amount Fund Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No. Amount Project Name Estimated Payment Total by Fiscal Year UPPER ETIWANDA CREEK PROJECT FY Amount ID FY Amount I/D 12/13 $13,000,000 THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, hereinafter called the DISTRICT, and Name City of Rancho Cucamonga hereinafter called City Address P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Telephone Federal ID No.or Social Security No. (909)477 -2700 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: (Use space below and additional bond sheets. Set forth service to be rendered, amount to be paid, manner of payment, time for performance or completion, determination of satisfactory performance and cause for termination,other terms and conditions,and attach plans,specifications,and addenda,if any.) This Agreement is made and entered into as of , 2013, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District relating to the financing of Storm Drain System 8. WHEREAS: pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 33670 of the Health and Safety Code, on February 21, 1982 the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as "City'), the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as "Agency'), the County of San Bernardino, the County of San Bernardino, acting on behalf of the County Free Library, and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (hereinafter referred to as "District') entered into an Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Pass Thru Auditor•ConfrollerlTreasurerlTax Collector Use Onl ❑Contract Database ❑FAS Input Date Keyed By Page 1 of 3 P254 Agreement") which established a cooperative relationship to pursue the financing and construction of flood control facilities that are of benefit to all parties; and WHEREAS: as a result of the Pass Thru Agreement, the District and the Agency have had a long history of partnering and jointly financing flood control improvements that benefit both parties; and WHEREAS: the District and the Agency entered into an Agreement (County Contract 05-603), dated June 21, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as "2005 Agreement"); and WHEREAS: pursuant to Section III, Item J of the 2005 Agreement, one of the projects identified in the 2005 Agreement as being eligible for funding from the Pass Thru Agreement was Storm Drain System 8 (hereinafter referred to as "East Avenue Storm Drain"), and WHEREAS: in compliance with Health and Safety Code Section 33445.1 the City and Agency adopted Resolutions 10-088 and RA 10-15 on June 16, 2010, respectively, which included the East Avenue Storm Drain project; and WHEREAS: on June 15, 2011 the Redevelopment Agency awarded a contract to Sully-Miller (hereinafter referred to as "Sully-Miller contract"), general contractor, for the construction of the East Avenue Storm Drain utilizing funding from the Pass Thru Agreement; and WHEREAS: on June 28, 2011 the State of California passed legislation commonly referred to as AB X1 26 which called for the dissolution of redevelopment and required the creation of a Successor Agency to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter referred to as "Successor Agency"); and WHEREAS: the Successor Agency identified the contract with Sully Miller contract as an enforceable obligation on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules (hereinafter referred to as "ROPS") for the time period of January 2012 to June 2012; and WHEREAS: the Department of Finance (hereinafter referred to as "DOF") did not reject the Sully Miller contract on January 2012 to June 2012 ROPS submission; and WHEREAS: on the third ROPS submittal the DOF rejected the Sully Miller contract as an enforceable obligation; and WHEREAS: the Successor Agency had requested and received a Meet and Confer on November 20, 2012 with DOF to discuss the Sully Miller contract rejection and a final determination from DOF was issued on December 18, 2012 which stated the Sully Miller contract is not an enforceable obligation; and WHEREAS: the East Avenue Storm Drain has been completed and a Notice of Completion was filed in November 2012 and the amount that is being contested by DOF is $842,583; and WHEREAS: the District is aware of the completion of the East Avenue Storm Drain, DOF's rejection of the East Avenue Storm Drain as an enforceable obligation, and acknowledges the East Avenue Storm Drain is allowed to be financed and constructed by the 2005 Agreement and the Pass Thru Agreement; and WHEREAS: the City, as the successor agency, added the District as an Affected Taxing Enity, making it therefore a recipient of the Agency tax increment pass through funds presently being held by City for transmittal to the District for on-going project and bond payments, and thus the source of funds for the City's East Avenue Storm Drain. NOW therefore, it is mutually understood and agreed as follows: Within 15 days of receipt by the District of the fund balance of the tax revenues that have been received by the Successor Agency as a result of the Pass Thru Agreement, which total approximately $12.5 million, the District Revised 1/8/13 Page 2 of 3 P255 shall remit to the City the amount of$842,583 which represents the amount paid for the East Avenue Storm Drain for the Sully Miller contract which was rejected by DOF. DISTRICT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the CITY its officers, agents, volunteers from any and all claims, actions or losses, damages, and/or liability resulting from the District's negligent acts or omissions which arise from the DISTRICT'S performance of its obligations under the agreement. CITY agrees to indemnify, defend (with counsel approved by DISTRICT) and hold harmless the DISTRICT and its officers, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all claims, actions, losses, damages and/or liability arising out of its obligations under this agreement. In the event the DISTRICT and/or the CITY is found to be comparatively at fault for any claim action, loss or damage which results from their respective obligations under the agreement, the DISTRICT and/or CITY shall indemnify the other to the extent of its comparative fault. Furthermore, if the DISTRICT or CITY attempts to seek recovery from the other for Workers' Compensation benefits paid to an employee, the DISTRICT and CITY agree that any alleged negligence of the employee shall not be construed against the employer of that employee. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (Print or type name of corporation, company, contractor,etc.) ► By ► Janice Rutherford, Board Chair (Authorized signature-sign in blue ink) Dated: Name (Print or type name of person signing contract) SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE Title CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD (Print or Type) Laura H. Welch, Clerk Dated: By Address Deputy Approved as to Legal Form Reviewed by Contract Compliance Presented to Board for Signature ► ► ► Counsel Date Date Date Revised 1/8/13 Page 3 of 3 P256 STAFF REPORT CITY IvLANAGEWS OFFICE 91 RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst II Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION COMMITTING THE CITY TO A MINIMUM 25% LOCAL MATCH OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR A TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 GRANT TO FUND THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL CONNECTION PROJECT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution committing the City to fund a minimum 25% local match of the total construction costs for the Pacific Electric Trail Connection Project. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) is the council of governments and transportation planning agency for San Bernardino County. SANBAG is responsible for cooperative regional planning and furthering an efficient multi-modal transportation system countywide. In August 1999, the SANBAG Board approved a policy that 80% of the Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds would be made available for projects that implement or improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The remaining 20% of TDA Article 3 funds would be made available for projects that improve access to transit stops for pedestrians and persons with disabilities. The SANBAG Board recently released the biennial Call for Projects for local jurisdictions and transit agencies to implement bicycle and pedestrian facilities and transit stop access improvements. Over $3.8 million is available for these calls. The total amount available for bicycle and pedestrian facilities is $3,069,621 and is comprised of funds from unused allocation of prior TDA awards and two fiscal years of revenue (FY 2012/2013 and FY 2013/2014). The City of Rancho Cucamonga is committed to improving connectivity, access and safety for bicyclists and pedestrians and wishes to submit a TDA grant application for the Pacific Electric Trail Connection Project. This project will improve connectivity from the Pacific Electric Trail to two Class 1 corridors. Specifically, the project will improve a dedicated path for bicyclists and pedestrians along segments of the Deer Creek and Day Creek Channels by upgrading the maintenance access roads to Class 1 bike lanes. A resolution adopted by the City Council committing the City to a local match of total construction costs is required as part of the TDA grant application. P257 RESOLUTION NO. 13-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COMMITTING THE CITY TO A MINIMUM 25% LOCAL MATCH OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL CONNECTION PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is eligible to submit a Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 grant application to the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) for the funding of construction costs associated with the Pacific Electric Trail Connection Project; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has estimated that the total construction costs of said improvements to be $115,500; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has identified in the grant application to be submitted to SANBAG a local match by the City equal to a minimum of 25% of the total construction costs, or $28,875; and WHEREAS, said 25% local match for a TDA Article 3 grant equal to $28,875, resulting in a total funding for said project equal to $115,500. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves to commit the City to a TDA Article 3 grant match of 25% of the construction costs of said project, up to $28,875. The City Council does reserve the right to exceed, on its authority, said 25% local match, should a grant amount greater than $115,500 be awarded to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. P258 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT r RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 C,UCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (WATER MILL HOMES, INC., OWNER— APN: 1089-081-16, 17, 20 & 21 —ANNEXATION NO. 11-2) LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVE. AND VICTORIA ST. TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS RECOMMENDATION Consideration of adoption of a resolution making determinations and authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of territory proposed to be annexed (Water Mill Homes, Inc., Owner—Annexation No. 11-2) to existing Community Facilities District No. 85-1 ("CFD No. 85-1") and calling a special election for such purpose. BACKGROUND Water Mill Homes, Inc., property owner, has submitted a proposal to subdivide 10.6 acres into 17 lots located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Ave. and Victoria St. (APN 1089- 081-16, 17, 20 & 21; the "Annexation Area") and is conditioned by the City and Fire District to annex to the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) 85-1 in order to mitigate the development's impact upon fire protection services. On October 5, 2011, the Board initiated formal annexation proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Mello-Roos Act") by adopting Resolution No. FD 11-037 approving an Annexation Map (Exhibit "A") of the territory proposed to be annexed and the Resolution of Intention to Annex APN 1089-081- 16, 17, 20 & 21 the existing CFD 85-1. On November 16, 2011, staff was notified that Water Mill Homes had not received clear title to the referenced property and was not able to move forward with the annexation process at that time. On March 6, 2013, staff received notice that Water Mill Homes had received clear title to the property and was ready to move forward to complete the annexation process. Therefore, on March 20, 2013 the Board approved a new Resolution of Intention to Annex APN 1089-081-16, 17, 20 & 21. This Resolution, among other things, declared the P259 ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO AN EXISTING CFD 85-1 May 1, 2013 intention of the Board of Directors to levy a special tax within the Annexation Area to finance fire protection and suppression services and setting a public hearing regarding the proposed annexation to be held on May 1, 2013. Through adoption of this resolution before the Board this evening, the Board will accomplish the following: • Make certain determinations as set forth in the resolution • Call for a special election to be conducted on May 8, 2013 • Authorize submittal of the levy of the special tax to qualified electors of the Annexation Area at such special election ANALYSIS The annexation of the Annexation Area into CFD No. 85-1 will satisfy the conditions of development relating to mitigating impacts upon fire protection services. Water Mill Homes, Inc., property owner, is in full support of the annexation of the property being annexed. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act, whenever there have been less than 12 persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 days preceding the public hearing pertaining to such annexation, the vote shall be by the landowners within the Annexation Area. Therefore, in the current circumstances, the election will be a landowner's vote, the landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof of land within the Annexation Area. Water Mill Homes, Inc., owner of the property within the Annexation Area, has executed a "Consent and Waiver" of time frames relating to the election. Exhibit "A" of the Resolution sets forth the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area which is consistent with the special tax levied upon all territory currently within CFD No. 85-1. At the special election to be held on May 8, 2013, the landowner(s) will be entitled to cast its ballot. The Board Secretary will then canvas the ballot, if received. At the next Board meeting, the Board will consider adopting the resolution declaring the election results and the annexation of the Annexation Area to CFD No. 85-1. If 2/3 of the votes are cast in favor of the levy of the special tax, the Board may declare the property to be annexed. The Public Notice regarding the Public Hearing has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Resp cttully su fitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachments 1. Annexation Map 2. Resolution No. FD 13-019 3. CFD No. 85-1 Map P260 e Ms 03 IOM - oE E ;daEe� k o°-os U = W _ fi EE€°Eod o�c es 3n1 v yJ VOINMLL3 eE- ° Q zo <=n =n °u 1rc awn � z V) 0!� LL. p 0O j O � z J 00 O U N F oUL- .- zoo j 0 Lj (.J a- Q 30N3ttl tlONYMLL3 C5 LLJ p � O O Q W < O � oz O Z e O If � m Q ~ Ua � I 00 � o X = (n W o = a Z z ZQC) of r wz H _ D - O U O MV1 3&W MR o r/ W W O NN ` DJ b'+„i a in D 0000 tb99 ££ c�2 x r}o 0 w w x N P261 RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 11-2) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY WHEREAS,the BOARD OF DIRECTORS(the"Board of Directors")of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT(the"Fire Protection District'), RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing community facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof (the "Act'). The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District'); and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of territory to the District,the extent of the territory to be annexed (the"Annexation Area"), the furnishing of certain public services and all other related matters has been given; and, WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received by 50% or more of the registered voters residing either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property owners representing more than one-half(1/2)or more of the area of land within the Annexed Area or within District; and, WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been less than twelve(12) persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the required special tax to the landowners of the Annexation Area, said landowners being the qualified electors as authorized by law. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS It is determined by this Board of Directors that: A. all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of law, and specifically the provisions of the Act; B. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation Area for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently, the qualified electors shall be the landowners of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the owner of record as of the close of the public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the Annexation Area; P262 C. the time limit specified by the Act for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area; D. the Secretary, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting any required election on a date which is less than 125 days following the adoption of this resolution; and E. the public services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied within the Annexation Area are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the Fire Protection District as a result of development and/or rehabilitation occurring in the Annexation Area. SECTION 3. BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXED AREA The boundaries and parcels of land in the Annexation Area and on which special taxes are proposed to be levied in order to pay the costs and expenses for the public services described in Section 4 below are generally described as follows: All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map entitled "Annexation Map No. 11-2 of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map"), a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. SECTION 4. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The services that are authorized to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are certain services which are in addition to those services required for the territory within the District and will not be replacing services already available. A general description of the services authorized to be financed by the District is as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide such services. The same types of services which are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are the types of services proposed to be financed from the special taxes proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area. If and to the extent possible such services shall be provided in common with District and the Annexation Area. SECTION 5. SPECIAL TAX Except where funds are otherwise available and subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, a special tax sufficient to pay for the services described in Section 4 that are required for the Annexation Area, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area will be levied annually within the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit"A" which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to clearly estimate the maximum amount of the special tax that such person will have to pay. Resolution No. FD 13-019 - Page -2 P263 The special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this Board of Directors may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. SECTION & SPECIAL TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.1, this Board of Directors hereby establishes the following accountability measures pertaining to the levy by the District of the special taxes within the Annexation Area as described in Section 5 above: A. Each such special tax shall be levied for the specific purposes section in Section 5. above. B. The proceeds of the levy of each such special tax shall be applied only to the specific applicable purposes set forth in Section 5. above. C. The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of the special taxes levied within the District shall be deposited. D. The Fire Chief or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the District, shall annually file a report with the Board of Directors as required pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.3. SECTION 7. ELECTION The proposition related to the levy of the special tax shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (1) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within said annexed territory. The special election shall be held on the 8th day of MAY 2013, and said election shall be a special election to be conducted by the Secretary(hereinafter"Election Official'). If the proposition for the levy of the special tax receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the special tax may be levied as provided for in this Resolution and the Board of Directors may determine that the Annexation Area is added to and part of the District. SECTION 8. BALLOT The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as follows: PROPOSITION A RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY Shall Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory shown on"Annexation Map No. 11-2 of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the"Annexation Map") pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the"Special Tax Formula")set forth Resolution No. FD 13-019 - Page -3 P264 in Resolution No. FD 12-044 to finance fire suppression and protection services and administrative expenses? SECTION 9. VOTE The appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word"YES'shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "NO" in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. SECTION 10. ELECTION PROCEDURE The Election Official is hereby authorized to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the following: A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct of the election. B. Cause to be printed the requisite number of official ballots,tally sheets and other necessary forms. C. Furnish and address official ballots for the qualified electors of the Annexation Area. D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required by law. E. Receive the returns of the election. F. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the returns. G. Canvass the returns of the election. H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election. I. Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred as a result of services performed for the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials. J. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election in the manner and form as required by law. Resolution No. FD 13-019 - Page -4 P265 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2013. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the day of 2013. Executed this day of 2013 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 13-019 - Page -5 P266 EXHIBIT "A" COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 11-2 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES The rate and method of apportionment, limitations on and adjustment to the Special Tax shall be as follows: To pay for fire suppression services, the Maximum Special Tax in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 11-2 for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 shall be: Structures Maximum Annual Special Tax Residential 1 DU = ($154.78) Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 = ($154.78) 3 DU: 2.25 = ($154.78) 4 DU: 2.65 = ($154.78) 5-14 DU: 2.65 = ($154.78) + {.35 (TU-4) ($154.78)} 15-30 DU: 6.15 = ($154.78) + {.30 (TU-14) ($154.78)} 31-80 DU: 10.65 = ($154.78) + {.25 (TU-30) ($154.78)} 81 — up DU: 23.15 = ($154.78) + {.20 (TU-80) ($154.78)) Commercial ($154.78) per acre + $.084 per SF Industrial ($154.78) per acre + $.102 per SF Note: DU = Dwelling Unit TU = Total Units SF = Square Foot ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted commencing on July 1, 2012 and each July 1s`thereafter for (a) changes in the cost of living or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. Resolution No, FD 13-019 - Page -6 P267 REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. LIMITATION ON SPECIAL TAX LEVY The Special Tax shall only be levied on Developed Property. Developed Property is defined to be property: which is not owned by a public or governmental agency; which is not vacant; where a "certificate of occupancy" or"utility release"from the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been issued; which has an existing building or structure onsite; which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities. Areas granted as easements for such purposes shall be subtracted from the total acreage of the underlying lot. The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes, State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of Directors shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by agreement, they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget requirements, the Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax. For further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax, reference is made to the Final Report Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fire Suppression Facilities/Services— Foothill Fire Protection District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Resolution No. FD 13-019 - Page -7 vft N N a co C y„ C c0 Z w w N Q J W O w CO L 'y CIS v- Cl ny tijayC) d U U o o Go C1 � j C t 3 ¢ m m o 0 Q j Li ¢ LJL l :�.._...!AV Ise3 i v Q my epueM43 ny epueMI13 � Q j i le Aaajo Aea (f,� C .._.._.._ ............. G' V ny Jalsayooa ny Ja;sayooa i ny uaN!p!IN ........._.._.,—z— ny uaN!II!W i i i ny uaneH i i ny uaneH i ny esowJaH i r ny esowJaH i AV ple4!yojV nb p!eq!ywy i i ny uewpaH i r ny uewllaH m ny pjem Aau!n 3S ue!!aweD ny anal ±� e ca w CD OD J L Y Y y 1 3 Y7E 3& (n m O of g IO m LL 'C C • Y�Y�ip F �U E33a�°J� F Y, EEE6 �� .�if2 P269 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ROBERT & HEATHER RADFORD, OWNERS —APN: 0227-732-01 —ANNEXATION NO. 13-1) LOCATED EAST OF EAST AVE, & SOUTH OF THE 1-210 FWY TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS RECOMMENDATION Consideration of adoption of a resolution making determinations and authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of territory proposed to be annexed (Robert & Heather Radford, Owners — Annexation No. 13-1) to existing Community Facilities District No. 85-1 ("CFD No. 85-1") and calling a special election for such purpose. BACKGROUND Robert & Heather Radford, property owners, have submitted a proposal to construct a 614 sq.ft. second dwelling unit on property located at 13606 Jeremy Ct. (APN 0227-732-01; the "Annexation Area") and is conditioned by the City and Fire District to annex to the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) 85-1 in order to mitigate the development's impact upon fire protection services. On March 20, 2013, the Board initiated formal annexation proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Mello-Roos Act") by adopting Resolution No. FD 13-010 approving an Annexation Map (Exhibit "A") of the territory proposed to be annexed and the Resolution of Intention to Annex APN 0227-732- 01 the existing CFD 85-1. This Resolution, among other things, declared the intention of the Board of Directors to levy a special tax within the Annexation Area to finance fire protection and suppression services and setting a public hearing regarding the proposed annexation to be held on May 1, 2013. P270 Annexation of Territory to an existing CFD 85-1 May 1, 2013 Through adoption of this resolution before the Board this evening, the Board will accomplish the following: • Make certain determinations as set forth in the resolution • Call for a special election to be conducted on May 8, 2013 • Authorize submittal of the levy of the special tax to qualified electors of the Annexation Area at such special election ANALYSIS The annexation of the Annexation Area into CFD No. 85-1 will satisfy the conditions of development relating to mitigating impacts upon fire protection services. Robert & Heather Radford, property owners, are in full support of the annexation of the property being annexed. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act, whenever there have been less than 12 persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 days preceding the public hearing pertaining to such annexation, the vote shall be by the landowners within the Annexation Area. Therefore, in the current circumstances, the election will be a landowner's vote, the landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof of land within the Annexation Area. Robert & Heather Radford, owners of the property within the Annexation Area, has executed a "Consent and Waiver" of time frames relating to the election. Exhibit "A" of the Resolution sets forth the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area which is consistent with the special tax levied upon all territory currently within CFD No. 85-1. At the special election to be held on May 8, 2013, the landowner(s) will be entitled to cast its ballot. The Board Secretary will then canvas the ballot, if received. At the next Board meeting, the Board will consider adopting the resolution declaring the election results and the annexation of the Annexation Area to CFD No. 85-1. If 2/3 of the votes are cast in favor of the levy of the special tax, the Board may declare the property to be annexed. The Public Notice regarding the Public Hearing has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Respectfully submitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachments 1. Annexation Map 2. Resolution No. FD 13-020 3. CFD No. 85-1 Map r EXH I BIT 'A' P271 MARCH 2013 ANNEXATION MAP 13-1 OF SHEET 1 OF 1 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA zla-Ewr FISHER OR 0 0 FISHER DR < 3EREMY CT m SMOKESTONE ST P ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 0227-732-01 JEREMY CT m 0_ w m e0 J t inch.135.M5979 feet F••1 NOTE:THIS ANNEXATION MAP SHALL GOVERN FOR ALL DETAILS AS TO THE EXTENT OF THE TERRITORY ANNEXED TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CERTIFICATION FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SIGNATURE: DATE: FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,CALIFORNIA.THISDAY 2413 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ASST.SECRETARY ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 0227-732-01 STATE OF CALIFORNIA I HEREBY CERTIFY THATTHE WITHIN MAP SHOWING BOUNDARIES OF TRACT 15798 LOT 23 BOOK 274 PAGE 84 TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.85.1 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA,WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SUCH FIRE PROTECTION OISTRICTAT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF.HELD ON THE DAY OF 2813,BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE THIS ANNEXATION MAP AMENDS THE BOUNDARY MAP FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA THIS MAP HAS BEEN FILED UNDER DOCUMENT NUMBER THIS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF DAY OF 2013,ATM.IN BOOK—OF MAPS OF CALIFORNIA,PRIOR RECORDED ON AT BOOK OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AT PAGE_AT MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS.AT THE REQUEST OF IN THE AMOUNT OF PAGE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,CALIFORNIA. DENNIS DRAEGER ASSESSOR-RECORDER-CLERK COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASST SECRETARY BY RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPUTY RECORDER P272 RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 13-1) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY WHEREAS,the BOARD OF DIRECTORS(the"Board of Directors')of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT(the"Fire Protection District'), RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing community facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof (the "Act'). The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District'); and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of territory to the District,the extent of the territory to be annexed (the"Annexation Area"), the furnishing of certain public services and all other related matters has been given; and, WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received by 50% or more of the registered voters residing either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property owners representing more than one-half(1/2)or more of the area of land within the Annexed Area or within District; and, WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been less than twelve(12) persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the required special tax to the landowners of the Annexation Area, said landowners being the qualified electors as authorized by law. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS It is determined by this Board of Directors that: A. all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of law, and specifically the provisions of the Act; B. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation Area for each of the ninety(90)days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently, the qualified electors shall be the landowners of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the owner of record as of the close of the public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the Annexation Area; P273 C. the time limit specified by the Act for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area; D. the Secretary, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting any required election on a date which is less than 125 days following the adoption of this resolution; and E. the public services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied within the Annexation Area are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the Fire Protection District as a result of development and/or rehabilitation occurring in the Annexation Area. SECTION 3. BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXED AREA The boundaries and parcels of land in the Annexation Area and on which special taxes are proposed to be levied in order to pay the costs and expenses for the public services described in Section 4 below are generally described as follows: All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map entitled "Annexation Map No. 13-1 of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map"), a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. SECTION 4. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The services that are authorized to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are certain services which are in addition to those services required for the territory within the District and will not be replacing services already available. A general description of the services authorized to be financed by the District is as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide such services. The same types of services which are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are the types of services proposed to be financed from the special taxes proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area. If and to the extent possible such services shall be provided in common with District and the Annexation Area. SECTION 5. SPECIAL TAX Except where funds are otherwise available and subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, a special tax sufficient to pay for the services described in Section 4 that are required for the Annexation Area, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area will be levied annually within the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit "A"which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to clearly estimate the maximum amount of the special tax that such person will have to pay. Resolution No. FD 13-020 - Page 2 of 7 P274 The special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable,this Board of Directors may, by resolution,establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. SECTION6. SPECIAL TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.1, this Board of Directors hereby establishes the following accountability measures pertaining to the levy by the District of the special taxes within the Annexation Area as described in Section 5 above: A. Each such special tax shall be levied for the specific purposes section in Section 5. above. B. The proceeds of the levy of each such special tax shall be applied only to the specific applicable purposes set forth in Section 5. above. C. The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of the special taxes levied within the District shall be deposited. D. The Fire Chief or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the District, shall annually file a report with the Board of Directors as required pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.3. SECTION 7. ELECTION The proposition related to the levy of the special tax shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (1) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within said annexed territory. The special election shall be held on the 8th day of MAY 2013, and said election shall be a special election to be conducted by the Secretary(hereinafter"Election Official'). If the proposition for the levy of the special tax receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the special tax may be levied as provided for in this Resolution and the Board of Directors may determine that the Annexation Area is added to and part of the District. SECTION 8. BALLOT The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as follows: PROPOSITION A RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY Shall Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory shown on"Annexation Map No. 13-1 of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the"Annexation Map') pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the"Special Tax Formula")set forth Resolution No. FD 13-020 - Page 3 of 7 P275 in Resolution No. FD 12-044 to finance fire suppression and protection services and administrative expenses? SECTION 9. VOTE The appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word"YES"shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "NO" in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. SECTION 10. ELECTION PROCEDURE The Election Official is hereby authorized to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the following: A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct of the election. B. Cause to be printed the requisite number of official ballots,tally sheets and other necessary forms. C. Furnish and address official ballots for the qualified electors of the Annexation Area. D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required by law. E. Receive the returns of the election. F. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the returns. G. Canvass the returns of the election. H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election. I. Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred as a result of services performed for the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials. J. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election in the manner and form as required by law. Resolution No. FD 13-020 - Page 4 of 7 P276 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _day of 2013. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the_ day of 2013. Executed this day of 2013 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 13-020 - Page 5 of 7 P277 EXHIBIT "A" COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 13-1 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES The rate and method of apportionment, limitations on and adjustment to the Special Tax shall be as follows: To pay for fire suppression services, the Maximum Special Tax in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 13-1 for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 shall be: Structures Maximum Annual Special Tax Residential 1 DU = ($154.78) Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 = ($154.78) 3 DU: 2.25 = ($154.78) 4 DU: 2.65 = ($154.78) 5-14 DU: 2.65 = ($154.78) + {.35 (TU-4) ($154.78)} 15-30 DU: 6.15 = ($154.78) + {.30 (TU-14) ($154.78)} 31-80 DU: 10.65 = ($154.78) + {.25 (TU-30) ($154.78)} 81 — up DU: 23.15 = ($154.78) + {.20 (TU-80) ($154.78)} Commercial ($154.78) per acre + $.084 per SF Industrial ($154.78) per acre + $.102 per SF Note: DU = Dwelling Unit TU = Total Units SF = Square Foot ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted commencing on July 1, 2012 and each July 1't thereafter for (a) changes in the cost of living or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. Resolution No. FD 13-020 - Page 6 of 7 P278 REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. LIMITATION ON SPECIAL TAX LEVY The Special Tax shall only be levied on Developed Property. Developed Property is defined to be property: which is not owned by a public or governmental agency; which is not vacant; where a "certificate of occupancy" or"utility release"from the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been issued; which has an existing building or structure onsite; which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities. Areas granted as easements for such purposes shall be subtracted from the total acreage of the underlying lot. The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes, State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of Directors shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by agreement, they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget requirements, the Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax. For further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax, reference is made to the Final Report Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fire Suppression Facilities/Services — Foothill Fire Protection District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Resolution No. FD 13-020 - Page 7 of 7 Fz 19 co 1 00 V Z � o o LL k C ny tijayo U U ° = Q ._.._.._.. cr J i r a ° Q i m c 3 LL LJL m a a L o •� jny epuem43 m ny epuem!13 I m a CIs laaio (ep ..................... V ny J91Sayooa ny la;sayooa r• i ny uaM!p!w -.._.._..-.. ny uaN!II!W 1 j 1 ny uaneH , ny uaneH i ny esowAaH — ny esowJaH I AV Ple4!yaJ`d . - --�- � AV Ple4!4ojV ny uewllaH -- U) ny uewllaH L i I L � ! i m i _ • _ j ny PjeAeulA 1S uepaujeo �.._.._. af ny anal anal L — 3 00 c IQ LL m 19 If g A all Fria$ § i:aE.€EE ,E ! P280 STAFF REPORT NGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: May 1, 2013 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager Subject: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO DECREASE CITY-OWNED STREETLIGHT ELECTRIC RATES WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY SERVICE AREA, PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and adopt a resolution amending the existing streetlight electric rates pursuant to the requirements and authority of Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. BACKGROUND In January 2012, the City of Rancho Cucamonga was a participating member to the Coalition for Affordable Streetlights (CASL) to Southern California Edison's (SCE's) 2012 Phase II General Rate Case A.11-06-007 with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Through the settlement process, the CASL group was able to convince the CPUC to have SCE reduce its streetlight facility charges by approximately 5% and its energy charge by approximately 2%, as well as no increases to its streetlight rate for the next three years as part of SCE's general rate design process. ANALYSIS As a result of CASL's work in Phase II of SCE's rate case, effective April 1, 2013, SCE has reduced its facility rates and energy charges for its street lighting customers, all in line with CASL's settlement agreement. The decrease to SCE streetlight rates have resulted in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's (RCMU's) streetlight rates being higher than SCE. RCMU is proposing to slightly decrease its streetlight rates so that it can continue to remain below SCE's LS-1 streetlight rates. so Energy Facility Lamp Energy Facility Lamp Charge Charge ($/ Charge Charge ($/ kWh/lam Lam /Month kWh/lam Lam /Month 150 Watt HIPS $0.07 $9.75 $0.065 9.30 16,000 Lumens 250 Watt HPS $0.07 $10.50 $0.065 9.60 27,500 Lumens The only RCMU customers affected by this rate decrease will be the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts (SLD's). The SLD's estimated savings will be around 5% or $171 per month or a little over $2,000 annually for all 197 RCMU streetlights. P281 City Council Staff Report Resolution to decrease RCMU streetlight electric rates May 1, 2013 If approved by the City Council, this decrease in RCMU streetlight electric rates will become effective on the customer's April billing cycle. The amended rates reflect the City's reasonable and prudent costs for such an enterprise and do not establish unfair, unreasonable or excessive rates that exceed the City's reasonable costs of doing business. The City has provided notification to the public by publishing notice of this hearing on April 18, 2013, and April 25, 2013, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a local newspaper of general circulation, and posting notice in at least two separate locations within the City. The proposed revised rates have been available for public review in the City Clerk's Office since the advertisements and resolution were first published on April 29, 2013. Respectfully submitted, jr�k er Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/FL Attachment: Resolution P282 RESOLUTION NO. 13-045 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO DECREASE STREETLIGHT ELECTRIC RATES, PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. A. Recitals. 1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing Electricity Service Rules and Regulations and authorizing that the rates, fees and charges arising, directly or indirectly, under said legislation be adopted pursuant to resolution, and thereafter, be amended from time to time by resolution. 2. City staff has prepared a comprehensive schedule of the rates, fees and charges that reflect the reasonable and prudent costs relating to the acquisition and distribution of electric power to retail customers and are recommending that the City Council adopt the recommended rates and fees. These rates do not present the City an opportunity to achieve profits or to impose charges in excess of the costs reasonably related to the development, maintenance and expansion of a municipal electric distribution system. The City Council has directed City staff to regularly review the operations of the City's electric utility to ensure that the rates are sufficient to cover all prudent business costs, reserves and capital equipment acquisition but not exceeding the amount necessary for the same. The rates, fees and charges reflect the reasonable costs to the City system only and do not reflect any excess rates, fees, or charges that are in excess of the reasonable costs of providing the electrical services as set forth hereinafter. 3. The City Council has reviewed the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and has determined that the adoption of the Electric Rules and Regulations has no foreseeable potential to a result in a significant impact upon the environment and is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). Further, the City Council has determined that the adoption of the fees is exempt from substantive environmental review under Section 15273 of the State CEQA Guidelines as no capital projects for system expansion are included in the proposed action. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and resolve as follows: Section 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. Resolution No. 13-045— Page 1 P283 Section 2. The rates, fees and charges assessed under Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 shall be as set forth on Attachment 1 hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Resolution No. 13-045 — Page 2 P284 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPAW MENT 91 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: May 1, 2013 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Thomas Grahn, Associate Planner Subject: CONSIDERATION OF-THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ANNUAL ACTION PLAN DRC2013-00297 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — A review of the Federally required 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan, which includes the selection of CDBG funded activities, based on an estimated grant allocation of$762,605. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, take public testimony regarding the application for funding, and adopt the Annual Action Plan, thereby authorizing the Mayor to submit the plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for their consideration. BACKGROUND: Since the adoption of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act in 1990, the Federal Government has required jurisdictions to develop a comprehensive long-range-planning format to address the use of entitlement funds, such as the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The primary focus of these planning efforts is to benefit low- and moderate-income individuals and families, homelessness, low-income target areas, and other special needs populations. HUD administers the CDBG program and requires the preparation of a 5-year Consolidated Plan and a 1-year Annual Action Plan to address each grantee's use of Federal funds. The 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan was adopted on April 21, 2010, and covers the program years from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2015, and this 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan will cover the program year from July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2014. ANALYSIS: CDBG FUNDING CDBG funds are provided by HUD based on a formula that considers a City's low-income census data, the extent of poverty, and age of the housing stock. Based upon this formula, we estimate that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive a grant allocation of $762,605, which represents a decrease of $41,831 from our current program year funding (a 5.2 percent reduction); however, as of the writing of this report, HUD had not yet released P285 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG ANNUAL ACTION PLAN DRC2013-00297—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 1, 2013 Page 2 formula allocations so our final allocation may change. This estimated funding level means that since 2010 the City's CDBG allocation has decreased by $340,603 (a 30.87 percent reduction). CDBG Funding FY 2009-2010 to FY 2013-2014 $1,IW,W9 W 51,103,108 � 51,010958 51,000,0m.m $918,613 i 5804,436 5161,WS $Bm,m0 m c � I S6W,00a.m i . � 4 r 54m,mo.m S1W,amm e ' 5. FY 2m?1010 MUM2011 %10111011 FY 10114013 %10132M4 To be eligible for CDBG funding, a proposed activity must meet one of two primary goals of the CDBG program: the development of viable urban communities, including decent housing, and a suitable living environment, or the expansion of economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate-income. Additionally, a proposed activity must meet a CDBG National Objective that benefits low- and moderate-income residents, eliminates conditions of slum and blight, or meets a particular urgent need. Lastly, a proposed activity must be eligible under CDBG guidelines. CDBG guidelines require that at least 70 percent of all funds be utilized on activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons. Of the activities proposed for the 2013-2014 program year, 80 percent will benefit persons of low- and moderate-income. THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The Annual Action Plan identifies how Federal funds will be used during a program year; it sets accomplishment goals for each activity and a time frame to complete them. The Annual Action Plan proposes activities the following areas: Administration, Capital Improvement, Home Improvement, and Public Service. All of the proposed activities meet a CDBG P286 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG ANNUAL ACTION PLAN DRC2013-00297—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 1, 2013 Page 3 National Objective, comply with the CDBG guidelines, and are included in the City's Consolidated Plan. Each year we receive numerous applications requesting funding for activities that far exceed our funding abilities. Because funding of the City's CDBG program is limited by the allocation we receive from HUD and how we distribute these funds is regulated by Federal regulations, coupled with the fact that over the past 4 years the City's CDBG allocation has decreased over 30 percent, the City simply cannot fund all application requests we receive. The following amounts identified in bold refer to recommended funding amounts from CDBG entitlement funds. Capital Improvement: Includes funds to public facilities and for public improvements. No new projects are recommended for funding; proposed activities are on-going and carry over from prior years. • Wheelchair Ramps: Retrofitting of existing intersection curbs to accommodate handicapped persons; this activity occurs on a citywide basis. Staff recommends funding this activity $22,850, which includes $21,660.00 in new grant funds and $1,190.00 in prior year reprogrammed funds. • Sidewalk Grinding and Replacement: The grinding, repair, or replacement of damaged and/or inaccessible sidewalks located in low-income targeted neighborhoods. Staff recommends funding this activity $22,850, which includes $21,660.00 in new grant funds and$1,190.00 in prior year reprogrammed funds. Home Improvement: The City's Home Improvement Program offers zero interest, deferred payment loans up to $30,000, and grants up to $7,500 for eligible low-income, owner-occupied, single-family, and mobile homes. This program has been extremely successful and we have received a significant number of requests for assistance from both the single-family and mobile-home community. Staff recommends funding this activity $495,322.51, which includes $452,374.00 in new grant funds, $21,904.84, in prior year reprogrammed funds, and$21,043.67 in Revolving Loan income. Public Service: Under the CDBG regulations, cities may allocate up to 15 percent of their entitlement to fund public service providers. Fifteen percent of our anticipated entitlement is $114,390.75, and staff recommends funding public service groups a total of $114,390.00. Proposed funding will support most of those subrecipients who currently receive funding through the City's CDBG program, no new activities are recommended for funding as our appropriation will decrease. CDBG funded public service activities include: Graffiti Removal, Fair Housing, Landlord Tenant Counseling, Homelessness and Food Assistance, Domestic Violence Shelter, Senior, Youth At-Risk, and Literacy programs. Staff recommends funding these activities $114,390.00. P287 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG ANNUAL ACTION PLAN DRC2013-00297—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 1, 2013 Page 4 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION HUD emphasizes public participation in the development of the Consolidated Plan through citizen participation at significant points in the process. Cities are required to make every effort to involve the community in the Consolidated Plan's development process, particularly those individuals that the Consolidated Plan strives to assist, including low- and moderate-income individuals and families, the homeless, and others with special needs. Rancho Cucamonga's Consolidated Plan established a 30-day public review period prior to the adoption of the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan. The public notice was published on April 2, 2013, identifying that the 2013 Annual Action Plan was available for public review and that the review period would run from Tuesday, April 2, 2013, through Wednesday, May 1, 2013. CORRESPONDENCE: Notice of the public hearing and proposed funding allocations was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on April 2, 2013. Respectful) submitted, Candyce Bu nett Planning Manager CB:TG/ge Attachments: Exhibit A— CDBG Funding Analysis Exhibit B —2013-2014 Annual Action Plan P288 IFY 29113-2111`14 FwWft tswM^Reductlon Administration $152,521.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $152.521.00 $152,521.00 Capital Improvrenenl ms $375,700.00 $102.380.00 $000 $0.00 ¢13,320.00 $145,700.00 Horne Improvement Programs $500.000.00 321,901.61 80.00 $21,043.87 $0.52.37000 $105,322.51 Public Service Program $182,010.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $114,390.00 $114,390. TMaI $1$10,231.00 $724,284.04 50.00 $21,013.67 $762,805.00 5907'933.51 NaMioitn Hour' Development Corporation $180,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SO. Rancho Cucamen PWSD-Sidewalk Grinding $22,850.00 $1.190.00 $0.00 $0.00 $21,080.00 522,85000 Rancho Cuwman aPWSD-Wheelchair Rams $22,850.00 $1.190.00 $0.00 50.00 $21,060.00 522,850.00 =Ran.C4hD - $150,000.00 $100.000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.1 $100,000.00 s3TS,TW.W S7o$390.00 $0.1 $9.00 $43,320.00 $145.700.06 m $.500000.00 $21,904.84 $0.00 521,043.67 $452,374.00 5095322.51 5500.000.00 $21,904.84 $0.00 $21,043.67 $452,374.00 $465322.51 Cam Fire USA $13.600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,900.00 $5,900. Foothill Fatally Shelter $4,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 SO.00 $0.00 $0.00 House of Ruth $6,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000 $5.700.00 $5,700.00 IFHMB-Fair Housing $11.600.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000 $8.800.00 $8,800.00 IFHMB-Landlodrrenant $8.730.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $7,400.00 $7,400.00 Inland Valley Hope Partners(SOVA) $10,000.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $5.300.00 $5.300. Legal Aid Sockay of San Bernardino $10.000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000 Mency Horse $10.000.00 $0.00 30.1 $0.00 $0.00 5000 National CORE-Hope Through Housing Foundation 58.000.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $000 Nontaown Housing Development Corporbasor, 55.000.00 $0.00 30.00 $0.001 $0.00 $000 Project Sister Fatally Services 36,900.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6.900.00 $6,900.00 Rancho Cucarnongs CMO-NMhMOxMCASA $7,000.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 Rancho Cucamonga CSD-Nothtown Colkborative $8,800.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 58.800.00 $8.800.00 Rancho CLwwW CSD-Senior Services 570,0W.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,400.00 $10.400.00 Rancho Ducenon CSD-SeniorT $15.400.00 $0.00 SO.1 50.00 $15.400.00 $15.400.00 Rancho Cucsmon Public 1- -Beck To Basics $8,000.00 SO-001 50.00 $0.00 $7,99000 $7,9m.00 Rancho Cucamonga PWSD-Graft Removal 1 $16,81.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $16,40.00 $16,41.1 Steelworkers Oldtimers Foundation-Senior Nutrition $20,000.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8.000.00 !8 40000 =d.'• ly6feN0:.pyypo 3182,010.00 $0.00 $9.00 $0.00 8114,390.00 $114,390.00 d _ Administrator-20%Cap 20.00% Possibe ACdfllanat to Administration $0.00 �._ _.. ... k.,b e P ms-15%Cap 15,OD% Nanel to Public Service 50.75 t Ser%nc 16.80% Capital Im rovement Programs 1605% Home Improvement Programs 54.55% .' Public Serviw Programs 1260% 1-owIMO1 Peanamnlap of P m Year Allocation 8000% LowlMod Percentalie of Teel Allocation 83.20% Pror Year plus Reprogram Funds $124,284.84 Di6erence Bova Requested 8 Allocation $447,626 00 EXHIBITA FY 2013-2014%Tables12013-2014 Draft Funding Analysis-04 03 2013-Revised.xls May 1, 2013 City Council Meeting — See the beginning of the Agenda packet for Speaker Cards. N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item N2. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Federally required Annual Action Plan — DRC2013-00297 Estimated grant allocation of $762,605 P28 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 2013-2014 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN DRAFT- MAY 11 2013 Prepared by: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 EXHIBIT B DRC2013-00297 P290 Table of Contents Section Page EXECUTIVESUMMARY..................................................................................................................................1 PURPOSE OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN.........................................................................................1 SUMMARY OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN STRATEGY.....................................................................1 PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN .......................................................................................3 PROPOSED CDBG ACTIVITY FUNDING.............................................................................................3 EVALUATION OF PAST PERFORMANCE...........................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................5 RESOURCES AVAILABLE ...................................................................................................................5 FEDERAL RESOURCES..........................................................................................................5 OTHER RESOURCES.............................................................................................................5 LEVERAGING AND MATCHING FUNDS ...............................................................................6 ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN...................................................................................................................7 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGIC PLAN...................................................................................7 Objective 1: Conservation of the existing single-family and multiple-family affordable housing stock..........................................................................7 Objective 2: Improve access to affordable housing for all low-and moderate-income households,with emphasis on the production of larger(3+ bedroom) rental units. .....................................7 Objective 3: Provide direct renter assistance to low-and moderate-income households in order to obtain or retain permanent housing. ................7 Objective 4: Increase housing opportunities for low-and moderate-income home ownership, particularly through homebuyer assistance. .............8 Objective 5: Support the rehabilitation of the existing housing stock,with emphasis on owner-occupied housing.....................................................8 Objective 6: Improve living conditions for low-and moderate-income households................................................................................................9 HOMELESS STRATEGIC PLAN ...........................................................................................................9 Objective 7: Assist homeless individuals,families,and persons with special needs, and those at-risk of homelessness...............................................9 HOMELESS ANNUAL PLAN .............................................................................................................10 NON-HOMELESS SPECIAL NEEDS STRATEGIC PLAN.......................................................................10 Objective 8: Support necessary rehabilitation services to special needs populations with emphasis on assisting the elderly and frail elderly.....................................................................................................10 Objective 9: Support service providers assisting special needs populations. ...........11 NON-HOMELESS SPECIAL NEEDS ANNUAL PLAN ..........................................................................11 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN ...........................................................................11 Objective 30: Provide improvements to public areas and public facilities to enhance living environments, improve the quality of life in low-and moderate-income neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals,seniors,and the handicapped. ..............................11 Objective 11: Assist local public and non-profit service agencies that improve the quality of life for low-and moderate-income persons and those with special needs........................................................................11 Objective 12: Ensure accessibility to all public facilities and structures. ....................13 Objective 13: The restoration and preservation of properties of social value City of Rancho Cucamonga Page i 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P291 for historic,architectural, and aesthetic reasons..................................13 Objective 14: Provide the necessary planning and administrative capacity to implement the CDBG program and the consolidated plan...................14 Objective 15: Alleviate physical and related economic distress through the stimulation of private investment and community revitalization in identified target neighborhoods. ................................14 Objective 16: Revitalize and upgrade housing conditions; prevent and eliminate blight and blighting influences; and eliminate conditions detrimental to the public health,safety,and welfare....................................................................................................15 OTHERACTIONS..........................................................................................................................................16 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT...........................................................................................................16 AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING ..............................................................................16 Summary of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice .................................17 OBSTACLES TO MEETING UNDER-SERVED NEEDS.........................................................................19 ACTIONS TO FOSTER AND MAINTAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING....................................................19 ACTIONS TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING......................................................19 ACTIONS TO EVALUATE AND REDUCE LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS..........................................19 ACTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF POVERTY LEVEL FAMILIES..............................................19 ACTIONS TO DEVELOP INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND ENHANCE COORDINATION................20 PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS...............................................................................................20 MONITORING.................................................................................................................................20 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION..............................................................................................................................21 HUDTABLES ................................................................................................................................................22 SUPPORTING MAP—LOW/MOD INCOME THRESHOLD CENSUS TRACT BLOCK GROUPS............51 APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (HUD FORM SF-424)....................................................52 CERTIFICATIONS.............................................................................................Certifications—Page 1 Specific CDBG Certifications.............................................................Certifications—Page 3 Appendix to Certifications................................................................Certifications—Page 5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page ii 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P292 List of Tables Table Page Table1: CDBG Program Funding...................................................................................................................3 Table 2: CDBG Activity Funding.....................................................................................................................4 Table 3: Homeless and Special Needs Populations (HUD Table 1A)............................................................22 Table 4: Special Needs (Non-Homeless) Populations (HUD Table 1B) ........................................................23 Table 5: Outcome/Objective Codes.............................................................................................................23 Table 6: Summary of Specific Housing/Community Development Objectives (HUD Table 1A/113 ContinuationSheet).....................................................................................................................................23 Table 7: Summary of Specific Objectives (HUD Table 1C)—Affordable Housing........................................24 Table 8: Summary of Specific Objectives (HUD Table 1C)—Priority Homeless Needs................................25 Table 9: Summary of Specific Objectives (HUD Table 1C)—Priority Non-Homeless Special Needs............25 Table 10: Summary of Specific Objectives (HUD Table 1C)—Non-Housing Community Development Needs...........................................................................................................................................................25 Table 11: Priority Housing Needs/Investment Plan Table (HUD Table 2A).................................................28 Table 12: Priority Community Development Needs (HUD Table 213) ..........................................................31 Table 13: Summary of Specific Housing/Community Development Objectives (HUD Table 2A/2B ContinuationSheet......................................................................................................................................32 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C) .................................................................34 List of Figures Figure Page Figure 1: Low/Mod Income Threshold Census Tract Block Groups.............................................................51 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page iii 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P293 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN Rancho Cucamonga's Consolidated Plan identifies the City's overall housing and community development needs and outlines a strategy to address them. The primary purpose of the Consolidated Plan is to match resources provided from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") through the Community Development Block Grant("CDBG")program with the City's identified needs and strategies. The Consolidated Plan then provides a centralized analysis of the City's community needs coupled with a 5-year strategy to address these identified needs. The current Consolidated Plan covers the period from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2015. SUMMARY OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN STRATEGY The Strategic Plan is a key component of the Consolidated Plan in that it combines an inventory of resources available to meet the City's housing and community development needs,with long-range measurable goals. The 1-year Annual Action Plan,an annual component of the Consolidated Plan,outlines specific targets and identifies available resources that will be committed to various programs for implementation during the upcoming program year. The following objectives identify a strategic listing of priorities for both housing and community development activities. Each set of priorities was developed in response to specific issues identified in the Consolidated Plan's Needs Assessment. HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGIC PLAN Obiective 1: Conservation of the existing single-family and multiple-family affordable housing stock. Policy 1.1: Support the acquisition of existing multi-family units to be held for future affordable housing stock. Policy 1.2: Support the acquisition and rehabilitation of existing single family homes. Objective 2: Improve access to affordable housing for all low-and moderate-income households,with emphasis on the production of larger(3+bedroom) rental units. Policy 2.1: Support the construction of affordable (multi-family) units. Policy 2.2: Support the construction of single-family infill development in low-and moderate-income neighborhoods. Objective 3: Provide direct renter assistance to low- and moderate-income households in order to obtain or retain permanent housing. Policy 3.1: Support the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County Section 8 Voucher and public housing assistance programs. Policy 3.2: Participate in the HOME Consortium Tenant-Based Rental Assistance program. Objective 4: Increase housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income home ownership, particularly through homebuyer assistance. Policy 4.1: Administer a City sponsored First Time Homebuyer Program. Policy 4.2: Participate in the HOME Consortium Homeownership Assistance Program. Policy 4.3: Assist the NHDC First Time Homebuyer Program. Objective 5: Support the rehabilitation of the existing housing stock, with emphasis on owner- occupied housing. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 1 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P294 Policy 5.1: Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied,single-family and mobile homes for extremely low-, low-,and moderate-income homeowners. Policy 5.2: Provide sewer connections to owner occupied, single-family, extremely low-, low-,and moderate-income homeowners in the southwest Rancho Cucamonga area. Policy 5.3: Participate in the HOME Consortium Affordable Housing Development Loan Program. Objective 6: Improve living conditions for low-and moderate-income households. Policy 6.1: Support programs of the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino to improve living conditions for public housing residents. HOMELESS STRATEGIC PLAN Obiective 7: Assist homeless individuals, families, persons with special needs, and those at-risk of homelessness. Policy 7.1: Support local homeless facilities and services. NON-HOMELESS SPECIAL NEEDS STRATEGIC PLAN Objective 8: Support necessary rehabilitation services to special needs populations with emphasis on assisting the elderly and frail elderly. Policy 8.1: Provide minor and emergency rehabilitation services to eligible households with emphasis on assisting low-and moderate-income seniors. Objective 9: Support service providers assisting special needs populations. Policy 9.1: Support special needs services in areas where there are significant under-served needs. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN Obiective1 : Provide improvements to public areas and public facilities to enhance living environments, improve the quality of life in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals,seniors,and the handicapped. Policy 10.1: Support infrastructure and sidewalk improvements in qualified target areas. Obiective 11: Assist local public and non-profit service agencies that improve the quality of life for low- and moderate-income persons and those with special needs. Policy 11.1: Support public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance,emergency shelters,domestic violence shelters,and senior,youth-at-risk,and literacy programs. Objective 12: Ensure accessibility to all public facilities and structures. Policy 12.1: Support the installation of handicap wheelchair ramps at all curb returns. Objective 13: The restoration and preservation of properties of social value for historic,architectural, and aesthetic reasons. Policy 13.1: Support the rehabilitation of significant historic structures, with primary emphasis on residential assistance. Objective 14: Provide the necessary planning and administrative capacity to implement the CDBG program and the provisions of the Consolidated Plan. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P295 Policy 14.1: Provide for the necessary planning and administrative activities of the CDBG program. Objective 1S: Alleviate physical and related economic distress through the stimulation of private investment and community revitalization in identified target neighborhoods. Policy 15.1: Support housing and Community Development activities that stimulate economic development. Objective 16: Revitalize and upgrade housing conditions, prevent and eliminate blight and blighting influences,and eliminate conditions detrimental to the public health,safety,and welfare. Policy 16.1: Support improvementsto residential energy efficiency,lead-based paint hazard reduction, and code enforcement through the City's Home Improvement Program. Policy 16.2: Support the City's Graffiti Removal Program operating in qualified target areas. Policy 16.3: Support the City's Code Enforcement Program operating in qualified target areas. PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The 1-year Annual Action Plan identifies specific projects consistent with the Consolidated Plan 5-year strategy listing the projects, programs, and resources that will be utilized during the 2013-2014 program year. This Annual Action Plan covers the period from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014. During the 2013-2014 program year, the City of Rancho Cucamonga anticipates receiving and estimated $762,605 in federal funds amounting to a 5.2 percent funding decrease from the 2012 program year: Table 1: CDBG Program Funding Program 2013-2014 Program Year Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) $762,605.00 CDBG Program Income (Home Improvement Program Revolving Loan) $21,043.67 Available CDBG (Roll Over from Prior Year) $124,284.84 Total $907,933.51 Source:Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department PROPOSED CDBG ACTIVITY FUNDING The following table identifies the total recommended allocation of CDBG resources and specific recommended allocations for housing and community development projects and programs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P296 Table 2: CDBG Activity Funding Project Consolidated Plan Prior Year FY 2013/2014 Total Funding Objective/Policy Reprogram/ Allocation Available Revolving Loan Administration I CDBG Administration Objective 14/Policy 14.1 $0.00 $152,521.00 $152,521.00 Administration Subtotal $0.00 $152,521.00 $152,521.00 capital Improvement Projects I Rancho Cucamonga PWSD'-Sidewalk Grinding Objective 10/Policy 10.1 $1,190.00 $21,660.00 $22,850.00 Rancho Cucamonga PWSD-Wheelchair Ramps Objective 12/Policy 12.1 $1,190.00 $21,660.00 $22,850.00 Capital Improvement Program Subtotal $2,380.00 $43,320.00 $45,70070 Home Improvement Program I Home Improvement Program Objective 5/Policy 5.1 $42,948.51 $452,374.00 $495,322.51 Home Improvement Program Subtotal $42,948.51 $452,374.00 $495,322.51 Public Services I Camp Fire USA Objective 11/Policy 11.1 $0.00 $5,900.00 $5,900.00 House of Ruth Objective 7/Policy 7.1& $0.00 $5,700.00 $5,700.00 Objective 11/Policy 11.1 IFHMB-Fair Housing Objective 11 Policy 11.1 $0.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00 IFHMB-Landlord/Tenant Objective 11 Policy 11.1 $0.00 $7,400.00 $7,400.00 Inland Valley Hope Partners-SOYA Objective 7/Policy 7.1& $0.00 $5,300.00 $5,300.00 Objective 11/Policy 11.1 Project Sister Family Services Objective 11/Policy 11.1 $0.00 $6,900.00 $6,900.00 Rancho Cucamonga CMO'-Northtown/CASA Objective 11/Policy 11.1 $0.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 Rancho Cucamonga CSD'-Northtown Collaborative Objective 11/Policy 11.1 $0.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00 Rancho Cucamonga CSD-Senior Services Objective 9/Policy 9.1 $0.00 $10,400.00 $10,400.00 Rancho Cucamonga CSD-Senior Transportation Objective 11/Policy 11.1 $0.00 $15,400.00 $15,400.00 Rancho Cucamonga Public Library-Back To Basics Objective 11/Policy 11.1 $0.00 $7,990.00 $7,990.00 Rancho Cucamonga PWSD-Graffiti Removal Objective 16/Policy 16.2 $0.00 $16,400.00 $16,400.00 Steelworkers Oldtimers Foundation-Senior Objective 11/Policy 11.1 $0.00 $8,400.00 $8,400.00 Nutrition Public Services Subtotal 4,390.00 $0 $114,3900 0 $100 ,00Contingency $100,00 TOTAL $145,328.51 $762,605.00 $907,933.51 1. Rancho Cucamonga Public Works Services Department. 2. Rancho Cucamonga City Manager's Office, 3. Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department. EVALUATION OF PAST PERFORMANCE Rancho Cucamonga's CDBG program performs consistent with HUD's overall goal,which is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities principally for low and moderate income persons(24 CFR Part 91). As part of HUD's vision for communities,Rancho Cucamonga continues to develop and strengthen public/private partnerships among all levels of government and the private sector;with activity in the private sector focusing primarily on non-profit organizations. This approach has led to collectively addressing both neighborhood and community related issues. Overall, Rancho Cucamonga utilizes CDBG resources effectively in the assistance of low- and moderate- income residents of the community. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan-Draft May 1,2013 P297 INTRODUCTION The Annual Action Plan provides a plan of investment and an outline of activities expected to be undertaken during the 2013-2014 program year. The report identifies local objectives and priority needs identified to implement the primary objective of the Community Development Block Grant("CDBG") program,which is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing,suitable living environment,and expanded economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate-income. RESOURCES AVAILABLE FEDERAL RESOURCES Community Development Block Grant Federal funds available to the City are allocated through HUD's CDBG program. During the 2013-2014 program year, we estimate that the City will receive an entitlement allocation of$762,605. This funding estimate is $41,831 (a 5.2% reduction) less than the City received in fiscal year 2012-2013. Additionally, during the 2012-2013 program year the City received$21,043.67 in revolving loans and retained$124,284.84 CDBG funds rolled over from prior years for a total of$907,933.51 available for the City's CDBG program. San Bernardino County Housing Authority The San Bernardino County Housing Authority serves as the local housing authority for the region. The Agency currently operates 138 Section 8 housing units and 12 public housing units located within the City. Sources of funds available to City residents through the Housing Authority are primarily limited to Section 8, Comprehensive Grant Improvement, and the Public Housing programs. County of San Bernardino Department of Community Development and Housing The County of San Bernardino Department of Community Development and Housing ("CDH") receives federal HOME Investment Partnerships Program("HOME")funds to implement the San Bernardino County HOME Consortium,which the Cityjoined in July 1995. In July 1996,the City approved a 3-year extension to the Cooperation Agreement for the period from October 1, 1996, to September 30, 1999. The City then approved a series of subsequent 3-year extensions to the Cooperation Agreement for the periods ending September 30, 2002,September 30, 2005,September 30, 2008,and September 30, 2011. On April 20, 2011, the City Council approved a proposed extension to the HOME Cooperation Agreement that will run for an additional 3-year period from October 1, 2011, to September 30, 2014. The County operates two programs through the HOME Consortium that includethe HOME Homeownership Assistance Program ("HAP")and the Affordable Housing Development Loan("AHDL")program. The County's allocation for the HOME program is estimated to be$2,208,276.00. OTHER RESOURCES Housing Successor Agency (Previously the Redevelopment Agency) State law previously required redevelopment agencies to set aside at least 20 percent of tax increment revenue for increasing and improving the community's supply of low- and moderate-income housing. Between July 1, 2008, and June 30, 2013, approximately$79.8 million was generated by tax increment for affordable housing. On December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court ruled in the redevelopment litigation (CRA v. Matosantos) upholding AB X1 26, abolishing redevelopment agencies, but also striking down companion legislation that would have allowed agencies to survive if they contribute money to the State. As part of the Supreme Court's ruling, agencies were dissolved on February 1, 2012. This means that many of the programs and services provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency to residents and businesses will no longer be available. Once dissolved, redevelopment agencies (through a designated City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P298 successor agency)will only be able to make payments on existing obligations. In July 1996, the RDA approved the sale of tax allocation bonds to provide permanent financing for two community based non-profit organizations, National Community Renaissance ("National CORE") and Northtown Housing Development Corporation("NHDC). On September 1, 1996,Tax Allocation Bonds in the amount of$37.66 million were sold. Proceeds of the bonds will be allocated in the following manner: • A pledge agreement through the year 2025 was signed with National CORE where$3.9 million will be provided annually for debt services and project reserves. Beginning year 6, if the provision of Redevelopment Law that allows for the acquisition of existing units with Housing Set-Aside funds has been extended beyond its current sunset, this $790,000 of the annual pledge will be deposited into a "Future Project Reserves" fund for use in acquiring additional apartment complexes within the Project Area. If a program is not developed, the funds will be available for any RDA housing program. • A pledge agreement through the year 2025 was signed with NHDC where$1.5 million was paid to NHDC on June 30, 1996,and again on December 30, 1996. An additional$5 million in net bond proceedswere also paid to the NHDC. These bond proceeds will be used to complete a portion of the capital improvement plan for the Northtown neighborhood that includes continuing the development of infill housing on vacant lots,acquisition,and rehabilitation of existing absentee-owned housing. The annual pledge amount will be $1.4 million through the year 2025. LEVERAGING AND MATCHING FUNDS Previously, the primary source of fund leveraging occurred through the use of RDA 20 Percent Set-Aside funds in public/private partnerships with non-profit housing development corporations such as National CORE and the NHDC. Other potential sources for leveraging include HOME funds and Low-Income Housing Tax Credits. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P299 ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGIC PLAN Objective 1: Conservation of the existing single-family and multiple-family affordable housing stock. Policy 1.1: Support the acquisition of existing multi-family units to be held for future affordable housing stock. Activity 1.1.1: This activity includes the acquisition of restricted,and previously unrestricted,at-risk units. Individual property owners, with pledge assistance from the RDA 20 Percent Set-Aside funds,obtain replacement financing for existing apartment complexes within the City. Each individual property owner manages their complex,and the RDA monitors the affordability covenants checking quarterly to ensure units are rented according to the agreement and the occupants comply with established income categories. Lead Agency: Housing Successor Agency(previously the RDA). Geographic Location: Activities will occur citywide. Resources:To date the RDA has acquired 1,641 affordable rental units that were funded using federal,state, or local incentives. The RDA acquired existing unrestricted units and added income restrictions to all or a portion of the units. The RDA has entered into public/private partnerships with various non-profit housing developers(e.g., National CORE and NHDC)to purchase and restrict units as affordable forat leasta 30-year period. Accomplishments and Time Frame: No additional units are planned for acquisition; however, during the 2012 program year the Housing Successor Agency will maintain the affordability covenants on these existing 1,641 units. Objective 2: Improve access to affordable housingfor all low-and moderate-income households,with emphasis on the production of larger(3+bedroom) rental units. Policy 2.1: Support the construction of affordable (multi-family) units. Activity 2.1.1: To increase the availability of affordable rental stock, the RDA, in conjunction with local non-profit development agencies,will pursue the new construction of affordable units in its existing target area. Activity emphasis is on the construction of units available to large families. Lead Agency: Housing Successor Agency and the NHDC. Geographic Location: Activities are focused in the RDA project area, but may occur citywide. Resources: Private financing and Low-Income Tax Credits. Accomplishments and Time Frame: No additional units are planned for the 2013-2014 program year. Objective 3: Provide direct renter assistance to low- and moderate-income households in order to obtain or retain permanent housing. Policy 3.1: Support the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County Section 8 Voucher and public housing assistance programs. Activity 3.1.1: The City will continue to support the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County("HACSB") programs for Section 8 Vouchers and public housing assistance. The HACSB currently manages 7,557 Section 8 vouchers for participants rentingfrom private landlords;within the City there are 138 Section 8 units serving 255 people. The HACSB also manages 1,661 public housing units in 21 cities and communities;within the City there are 12 public housing units City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P300 serving 53 people. Lead Agency: Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino. Geographic Location:These programs are available citywide. Resources: Federal housing funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame:Annually support 16 public housing units and 170Section 8 applications. Objective 4: Increase housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income home ownership, particularly through homebuyer assistance. Policy 4.2: Participate in the HOME Consortium Homeownership Assistance Program. Activity 4.2.1: The Homeownership Assistance Program("HAP")serves households earning 80 percent or lessoftheAMI. Applicants must have lived or worked in San Bernardino County for at least one year and not currently own their own home, and the acquired property will be the applicant's principle place of residence. The applicant must be able to contribute at least 3 percent of the purchase price, qualify for private first mortgage financing, and make monthly payments on the first mortgage. HAP provides single-family homeownership opportunities through fund closing costs, down payments, and gap financing. HOME assistance is provided under a deferred loan (silent second), secured by a Deed of Trust. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino CDH" HOME Consortium. Geographic Location:This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium. Applications are accepted from participating lenders on behalf of eligible prospective buyers on a first-come first-served basis. CDH is estimating an allocation of approximately$200,000.00 to support this activity. Accomplishments and Time Frame: This activity is targeted towards income eligible applicants, not by location, so no known units are proposed for assistance during the 2013-2014 program year. The City will work with the HOME Consortium to publicize the availability of this program within Rancho Cucamonga. Objective 5: Support the rehabilitation of the existing housing stock, with emphasis on owner- occupied housing. Policy 5.1: Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied,single-family and mobile homes for extremely low-, low-,and moderate-income homeowners. Activity 5.1.1: The City has an existing moderate rehabilitation Home Improvement Program available to eligible owner-occupied households, those earning less than 80 percent of the AMI. The program offers deferred payment loans of up to $30,000 and grants of up to $7,500, including emergency repair grants. The City runs this as a full service program and not only lends the money, but secures contractors,oversees the work,and maintains administration of the grants and loans rather than farming this work out to the bank or homeowner. While this method requires additional staff time, it is done to provide a high level of customer service and ensure both consistent and efficient results. Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Geographic Location:This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $495,322.51. (Funding for this activity includes$452,374.00 in new grant funds,$21,043.67 in Revolving Loan funds, and $21,904.84 reprogrammed from prior program years.) City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P301 Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2014, assist 40 households. Policy 5.3: Participate in the HOME Consortium Affordable Housing Development Loan Program. Activity 5.3.1: The Affordable Housing Development Loan("AHDL") program provides financial assistance in the form of gap financing to qualified individuals,for-profit entities, and non-profits for the purpose of new construction, acquisition, and/or rehabilitation of affordable housing. Any rental housing developed with the assistance of HOME funds must benefit very low- income households at 50 percent or less of the AMI and low-income households at 80 percent or less of the AMI. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino CDH, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location:This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources:HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium. CDH is estimating an allocation of approximately$1,787,449.00 to support this activity. Accomplishments and Time Frame: This activity is targeted towards income eligible applicants, not by location, so no known units are proposed for assistance during the 2013-2014 program year. The City will work with the HOME Consortium to publicize the availability of this program within Rancho Cucamonga. Objective 6: Improve living conditions for low-and moderate-income households. Policy 6.1: Support programs of the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino to improve living conditions for public housing residents. Activity 6.1.1: The City will continue to support the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County("HACSB") programs for public housing assistance. The HACSB manages 1661 public housing units in 21 cities and communities; within the City there are 12 public housing units serving 53 people. When requested by the HACSB, the City will certify consistency with their Consolidated Plan. Lead Agency: Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino. Geographic Location:This program will benefit residents citywide. Resources: Federal housing funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame:Through June 30, 2014, maintain assistance to 12 public housing units serving 53 persons. HOMELESS STRATEGIC PLAN Objective 7: Assist homeless individuals,families,and persons with special needs,and those at-risk of homelessness. Policy 7.1: Support of local homeless facilities and services. Activity 7.1.1: The City supports a variety of organizations that provide immediate assistance, advocacy, and short-term shelter to homeless individuals and families. The City will continue to address priority needs, and will continue to evaluate the provision of transitional shelter assistance. These agencies include: House of Ruth: House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe, self- sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency hotline,emergency shelterfor up to 45 days,transitional living shelter for up to 2 years, and case management and domestic violence support services at City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P302 conveniently located walk-in centers. House of Ruth is located in Claremont,at P.O.Box 457,Claremont, CA 91711. • Inland Valley Council of Churches.dba. Inland Valley Hope Partners—SOVA Program Center:SOVA offers a 5-day food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. The IVCC is located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Geographic Location:The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: Subrecipient CDBG Funding House of Ruth $5,700.00 Inland Valley Hope Partners $5,300.00 Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2014, assist the following: Subrecipient Accomplishment Goal House of Ruth 217 Inland Valley Hope Partners 1,000 HOMELESS ANNUAL PLAN The City's goal is to develop a comprehensive homeless assistance plan that provides a continuum of care with the purpose of ultimately assisting individuals in obtaining and retaining permanent housing. As the first priority in the plan,the City intends to continue funding those agencies that are able to provide the first line of defense in providing outreach and advocacy in assisting individuals and families who are homeless or at-risk of homelessness. These activities include the support of emergency shelter, shelter vouchers,food distribution, advocacy, and referral services. The City will continue to fund landlord/tenant activities as a means of assisting those who are at-risk of homelessness in keeping their homes. Additional assistance will be encouraged for those agencies that provide longer-term transitional shelter and assist in the transition to permanent housing opportunities. NON-HOMELESS SPECIAL NEEDS STRATEGIC PLAN Obiective 8: Support necessary rehabilitation services to special needs populations with emphasis on assisting the elderly and frail elderly. Policy 8.1: Provide minor and emergency rehabilitation services to eligible households with emphasis on assistance to low-and moderate-income seniors. Activity 8.1.1: This program will complement the City's Home Improvement Program by providing minor rehabilitation and emergency assistance to low-and moderate-income residents and senior citizen households whose income falls below 80 percent of the AMI. Permitted home repairs include minor plumbing, electrical, carpentry, and roof repairs. Residents who are owner occupants are eligible to receive two visits, up to$300 per visit,and in emergencies, the allowance of a one-time material charge for up to $500. The Oldtimers Foundation is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335. Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Geographic Location:This activity is no longer available. Resources: CDBG funds: $0.00. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P303 Accomplishments and Time Frame: No additional accomplishments are proposed as the Steelworkers Oldtimers Foundation has discontinued their Home Maintenance Program. Objective 9: Support service providers assisting special needs populations. Policy 9.1: Support special need services in areas where there are significant under-served needs. Activity 9.1.1: Develop and enhance senior citizen classes and activities in the focus areas of physical fitness, recreational and educational development, mental health, and emotional well- being. Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department. Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, 11200 Base Line Road. Resources: CDBG funds: $10,400.00. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2014, assist 858 persons through the scheduled activities. NON-HOMELESS SPECIAL NEEDS ANNUAL PLAN Objectives 8 and 9, as stated above, identify actions the City intends to take over the next program year to address the needs of persons who are not homeless, but have special needs. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN Objective 10: Provide improvementsto public areasand public facilities to enhance living environments, improve the quality of life in low-and moderate-income neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals,seniors, and the handicapped. Policy 10.1: Support infrastructure and sidewalk improvements in qualified target areas. Activity 10.1.1: The City will fund the following public improvement projects: Sidewalk Grinding and Replacement in Identified Target Neighborhoods:Involves the grinding,repair,or replacement of sidewalks that are displaced and/or inaccessible. Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Public Works Services Department. Geographic Location: Sidewalk Grinding efforts may be carried out in all eligible neighborhoods including CT 8.12 BG 2, CT 20.04 BG 1, CT 20.05 BG 1, CT 21.00 BG's 2, 3, 4, 6, &7, and CT 22.03 BG 1. Resources: CDBG funds: • Sidewalk Grinding: $22,850.00. (Funding for this activity includes$21,660.00 in new grant funds and $1,190.00 reprogrammed from prior program years.) Accomplishments and Time Frame:By June 30,2014,replace approximately 3,960 square feet of sidewalk in eligible neighborhoods. Objective 11: Assist local public and non-profit service agencies that improve the quality of life for low- and moderate-income persons and those with special needs. Policy 11.1: Support public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance,emergency shelters,domestic violence shelters,and senior,youth-at-risk,and literacy programs. Activity 11.1.1: The City will continue to fund public service agencies that include: • Camp Fire Inland Southern California Council:The program provides a 5-day resident camp session to learn responsibility, develop skills,and gain confidence while building independence and self-reliance. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P304 The camp session is run at Camp Nawakwa, located in the Barton Flats recreation area of the San Bernardino Mountains. Camp Fire is located at 9037 Arrow Route, Suite 140, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. • House of Ruth: House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe, self- sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency hotline,emergency shelter for up to 45 days,transitional living shelter for up to 2 years, and case management and domestic violence support services at conveniently located walk-in centers. • IFHMB—Fair Housing: Fair Housing services include education,counseling,mediation,and legal referral. Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board ("IFHMB") is located at 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 101, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. • IFHMB — Landlord Tenant Mediation: Landlord/Tenant dispute mediation services are provided by IFHMB. • Inland Valley Council of Churches,dba, Inland Valley Hope Partners—SOVA Program Center:SOVAoffers a 5-day food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providing emergencyfood assistance and support services. The IVCC is located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. • Proiect Sister Family Services: Project Sister provides sexual assault and violence prevention byworking with teens addressing date rape,sexual harassment,and personal safety awareness, and working with seniors,who are vulnerable to sexual assault,robbery,burglary,and financial exploitation. Project Sister is located at P.O. Box 1390, Claremont, CA 91711. • Rancho Cucamonga City Managers Office — Northtown/CASA —The Cocinando Amigos Saludables y Alegres(CASA) program provides a bi-lingual healthy eating/cooking program to educate and support Latino families in the Northtown neighborhood of the City, to prepare traditional food that is healthier and more nutritious, as a strategy to prevent diabetes and obesity. The Rancho Cucamonga City Manager's Office currently coordinates the CASA program atthe Northtown Community Center,located at 10071 Feron Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. • Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department — Northtown Collaborative: The Northtown Collaborative is a community(youth and adult)prevention recreation/human services program provides essential human service programs as well as traditional recreational classes and activities. The program is conducted through a joint use agreement with the Cucamonga Middle School and NHDC. The Community Services Department is located at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. • Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department -Senior Transportation: The Silver Fox Express program offers door-to-door para-transit service for senior citizens living in Rancho Cucamonga. The programs primary focus is to bring isolated seniors to the James L. Brulte Senior Center for the daily nutrition program and senior classes, programs, and workshops. The program also provides weekly shopping excursions and trips to local doctors/pharmacies. The Community Services Department is located at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. • Rancho Cucamonga Public Library—Back ToBasics:TheBacktoBasicsprogramtrainsvolunteertutorsto work with 7 to 12-year old children identified by school personnel as at-risk (challenged economically and educationally) and who are reading and writing below their grade levels. The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library has two locations,the Archibald Branch is located at 7368 Archibald Avenue,and the Biane Library is located at 11505 Cultural Center Drive. • Steelworkers Oldtimers Foundation —Senior Nutrition: The nutrition program is run from the Senior City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P305 Center in which 22,500 hot meals would be provided at the RC Senior Center and 16,250 meals prepared for home delivery. Oldtimers Foundation is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335. Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Geographic Location:The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: Subrecipient CDBG Funding Camp Fire USA $5,900.00 House of Ruth $5,700.00 IFHMB—Fair Housing $8,800.00 IFHMB—Landlord/Tenant Mediation $7,400.00 Inland Valley Hope Partners $5,300.00 Project Sister Family Services $6,900.00 Rancho Cucamonga CMO—Northtown/CASA $7,000.00 Rancho Cucamonga CSD—Northtown Collaborative $8,800.00 Rancho Cucamonga CSD—Senior Transportation $15,400.00 Rancho Cucamonga Public Library—Back To Basics $7,990.00 Steelworkers Oldtimers Foundation—Senior Nutrition $8,400.00 Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2014, assist the following: Subrecipient Accomplishment Goal Camp Fire USA 40 House of Ruth 217 IFHMB—Fair Housing 52 IFHMB—Landlord/Tenant Mediation 422 Inland Valley Hope Partners 1,000 Project Sister Family Services 1,200 Rancho Cucamonga CMO—Northtown/CASA 8,500 Rancho Cucamonga CSD—Northtown Collaborative 3,950 Rancho Cucamonga CSD—Senior Transportation 1,680 Rancho Cucamonga Library—Back To Basics 140 Steelworkers Oldtimers Foundation—Senior Nutrition 1,800 Objective 12: Ensure accessibility to all public facilities and structures. Policy 12.1: Support the installation of handicap wheelchair ramps at all curb returns. Activity 12.1.1: This program involves the retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate disabled individuals. Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Public Works Services Department. Geographic Location:The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $22,850.00. (Funding for this activity includes$21,660.00 in new grant funds and $1,190.00 reprogrammed from prior program years.) Accomplishments and Time Frame:ByJune 30,2014,provide approximately 2,880 square feet of curbing for handicap ramps. Objective 13: The restoration and preservation of properties of social value for historic,architectural, and aesthetic reasons. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P306 Policy 13.1: Support the rehabilitation of significant historic structures, with primary emphasis on residential assistance. Activity 13.1.1: The preservation and historic restoration of the Etiwanda Railway Station. The mission of this activity is to preserve the station through renovation for adaptive reuse as a museum and trailhead for the Pacific Electric Inland Trail, a 21-mile long regional trail. It is anticipated that this activity will be a multi-year program, requiring additional CDBG funds in future program years. Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Geographic Location:The Etiwanda Railway Station is located at 7089 Etiwanda Avenue. Resources: CDBG funds: $0.00. Accomplishments and Time Frame:Duringthe 2012-2013 program year,the City initiated restoration efforts to prevent further decay. These efforts include repairing the roof, remediating environmental hazards,and securing the structure to prevent further decay. No new funds will be added for the 2013-2014 program year and additional rehabilitation efforts will continue when additional funding is available. Objective 14: Provide the necessary planning and administrative capacity to implement the CDBG program and the consolidated plan. Policy 14.1: Provide for the necessary planning and administrative activities of the CDBG program. Activity 14.1.1: Includes administration of the CDBG program,the completion of program applications and performance reports, research and analysis, target area studies, historic preservation evaluations, and housing documents. Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Geographic Location:The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $152,521.00. Accomplishments and Time Frame:ByJune 30,2014,complete all administrative and program management oversight to ensure efficient and effective use of CDBG funds. Objective 15: Alleviate physical and related economic distress through the stimulation of private investment and community revitalization in identified target neighborhoods. Policy 15.1: Support housing and Community Development activities that stimulate economic development. Activity 15.1.1: Review and evaluation of Foothill Boulevard. Foothill Boulevard west of Haven Avenue is older with mixed uses and appears to be reaching stages of economic distress, while the area east of Haven Avenue has primarily new development and vacant land. The concern is with revitalization of the older areas and planning land use to ensure effective and balanced growth along Foothill Boulevard. Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Geographic Location:Approximately six miles from Grove Avenue to East Avenue. Resources: City General Fund. Accomplishments and Time Frame: On January 16, 2002, the City Council adopted the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. The Visual Improvement Plan will be implemented by private development as vacant properties fronting along Foothill Boulevard develop and through public improvements where the street frontage is currently improved. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P307 The purpose of the Visual Improvement Plan is to develop a design specification plan that will set forth design concepts for the streetscape improvements within the public rights-of-way and entry areas along the entire length of Foothill Boulevard. The plan will helpguide a balanced and unified pattern of streetscape for both public and private development. By drawing upon the existing positive improvements and developing a set of unique and unifying historic elements,this plan will ensure that Foothill Boulevard will be an exciting reflection of the historic Route 66 as well as a historic Rancho Cucamonga. A variety of improvements have been installed along Foothill Boulevard, in the vicinity of the Victoria Gardens mall; however, much of the Visual Improvement Plan has not yet been implemented. Through June 30, 2014, continue with the implementation of the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan as it applies to development occurring along Foothill Boulevard. Obiective 16: Revitalize and upgrade housing conditions; prevent and eliminate blight and blighting influences;and eliminate conditions detrimental to the public health,safety,and welfare. Policy 16.1: Support improvements to residential energy efficiency,lead-based paint hazard reduction, and code enforcement through the City's Home Improvement Program. Activity 16.1.1: The City currently funds a Home Improvement Program in which,through the course of that activity, the rehabilitation improvements mentioned previously would be completed. A separate activity will not be developed. Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Geographic Location:The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Activity accomplishments occur through the Home Improvement Program (See Activity 5.1.1). Policy 16.2: Support the City's Graffiti Removal Program operating in qualified target areas. Activity 16.2.1: The removal of incidents of graffiti from public properties in qualified target areas. Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Public Works Services Department. Geographic Location: This activity is available in all eligible target neighborhoods including CT 8.12 BG 2, CT 20.04 BG 1, CT 20.05 BG 1, CT 21.00 BG's 2, 3, 4, 6, & 7, and CT 22.03 BG 1. Resources: CDBG funds: $16,400.00. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2014, remove approximately 15,000 square feet of graffiti. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P308 OTHER ACTIONS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT As previously noted, on December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court ruled in the redevelopment litigation (CRA v. Matosantos)upholding AB X126,thereby abolishing redevelopment agencies,which were subsequently dissolved on February 1, 2012. This means that many of the programs and services provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, including Economic Development activities, may no longer be available. Prior discussions on Economic Development activities included the following: The RDA Implementation Plan for 2009-2014 includes a section addressing the "Economic Development and Enhancement Programs",which the RDA has implemented to help strengthen the economic environment of the business sector within the redevelopment project area. These programs were developed to address the needs of the existing business community, attract new businesses to the City, and provide long-term employment opportunities that will strengthen the City's economic base. The RDA's economic development goals focus on job creation, improving the quality of life for residents and businesses, increasing the City's tax base,and providing opportunities for public and private partnerships, including private investment in the City. The RDA has successfully implemented a variety of marketing and promotion strategies suggested in the Implementation Plan that have leveraged the community's attributes and established a positive business image for Rancho Cucamonga. The RDA's marketing and promotion efforts have significantly affected employment,expansion,and the local tax base. From 1994-2001, more that 80 companies expanded and/or relocated creating more than 5,300 new jobs because of the RDA's marketing and promotion efforts. Although the City's success in economic development is not a direct result of the RDA's marketing and promotional efforts, the RDA has managed to facilitate that growth. Apartfrom the specifics of the Economic Development strategy,the RDAassists companies through participation in the following programs. The Inland Empire Small Business Development Center (SBDC), which offers a variety of resources to improve business operation including, business consulting,seminars and workshops,information resources,procurement assistance,environmental assistance, and a variety of other programs. AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING In 1984, the City began contracting with the IFHMB to provide for the education and enforcement of state and federal housing laws for all residents who request assistance. The IFHMB provides public education, mediation, counseling, testing, and legal referral services to promote fair housing. Having the IFHMB administer the Fair Housing Program assures that there are no impediments to fair housing choices. Fair Housing education is provided as a major component of the program with a goal of providing the knowledge of what is Fair Housing to all partners of the housing industry. Fair Housing outreach is provided through radio programming,mass media,brochures,and the IFHMB web site(http://www.ifhmb.com). Enforcement is provided through the process of mediation through the IFHMB, or a related enforcement agency. And finally, Fair Housing testing is used as a tool to gather evidence of discrimination. The Fair Housing program attempts to accomplish the primary objectives of the City's Fair Housing Impediments Analysis by providing for the education, counseling, mediation, testing, and legal referral of Fair Housing issues within the community. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P309 Summary of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its most recent update the City's Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (the"Al") on June 2, 2010. Copies of the City's Al, and other CDBG related documents,are available on the City's website (http://www.citvofrc.us/citvhall/planning/cdbg.asp). Rancho Cucamonga is a progressive community with respect to the provision of a range of housing opportunities and its proactive stance to ensure the fair treatment of people in the rental,sale, occupancy, and financing of housing. The following recommendations included in the Al and are offered to continue advancing fair housing opportunities in Rancho Cucamonga. 1. CHANGESTO DEVELOPMENT CODE: The California Legislature has passed new statutes to facilitate and encourage the development of housing for homeless people. The Government Code requires that jurisdictions specify at least one zone where a year-round emergency shelter can be permitted as a by-right use. Transitional housing and permanent supportive housing must also be treated like any other residential use in the same zone and are subject to the same regulations as other residential uses located in the same zone. The 2008-2014 Housing Element proposes to allow emergency shelters as a by-right use in the General Commercial (GC) Zone with development and operational standards as allowed under state law. The Housing Element also proposes to permit transitional and supportive housing serving up to six clients like residential care facilities as a by-right use in all residential zones. For larger facilities where the use operates like multiple-family projects, such uses will be permitted where multiple-family projects are permitted. 2. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION: The federal Fair Housing Act and California Fair Employment and Housing Act impose an affirmative duty on local governments to make reasonable accommodation in building codes,zoning/land use regulations,and administrative practices to afford disabled persons an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. In 2001,the State Attorney General also issued a letter encouraging local governments to adopt a reasonable accommodation procedure. Housing Element law has also been changed to require local governments to affirmatively further fair housing for people of disabilities. Rancho Cucamonga has an active program to make its facilities, programs, and services accessible to residents. For housing projects, the City also already has the mechanisms in the municipal codes (e.g., administrative exceptions) to make reasonable accommodations. However, HCD will require more affirmative action as a prerequisite for approval of the housing element. The 2008-2014 Housing Element therefore includes a program to create a reasonable accommodation ordinance that would specify the process for obtaining a accommodation, required findings, and other procedural aspects. 3. PERMITTING PROCESSES: The City's residential growth management review system has been an effective tool for ensuring high quality development. All residential projects are required to adhere to "absolute policies" intended to ensure neighborhood compatibility, compliance with adopted plans, adequacy of public facilities and services, and protection of the public environment and public health. Moreover,each project must adhere to residential development standards and design guidelines to ensure project livability. Exemptions to the ordinance are allowed for developments involving four units or less, land divisions involving four lots or less, and government-subsidized senior citizen housing projects. Fair housing law discourages treating the approval of housing projects differently based on the intended occupants of the project. The current system gives a preference for affordable senior housing, but not for affordable family housing. To avoid a potential fair housing concern,this exemption should be either extended to affordable family housing or deleted altogether. 4. SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY: The Senior Housing Overlay District offers incentives to encourage the development of affordable housing for seniors earning up to 80 percent of AMI. The Development Code City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P310 defines a senior household for purposes of this overlay and the incentives granted under it as a married couple in which at least one spouse is age 55 or over or an unmarried household in which all members are age 55 or over. The Development Code provides incentives such as required onsite parking, fee waivers/reductions, and a density bonus if the project complies with state density bonus law. Fair housing law discourages treating the approval of housing projects or granting of incentives differently based on the marital status of occupants. There does not appear to be a clear rationale for why marital status should be a distinguishing factor in why a senior development project should qualify for incentives. The state density bonus law provides for such incentives, and marital status is not a pre-qualification. To avoid a potential fair housing concern,the City may wish to eliminate the clause related to marital status so as not to constrain housing choices for seniors. 5. TRANSIT SERVICE: Accessibility to public transit is a factor in housing choice for many households, especially lower income and senior households that may have limited or no access to a personal vehicle. For these households, access to public transit can be critical for employment and necessities such as grocery shopping, health care, and other routine activities of daily life. Transit agencies that receive federal funds must demonstrate that no persons are subject to discrimination in the level and quality of transportation services and/or transit-related benefits based on protected status. Omnitrans has developed a grid service network with routes spaced at one-mile intervals, resulting in generally equitable transit service coverage, with most urban areas of the San Bernardino Valley within %: mile of a transit route. Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") complementary para-transit service is provided within '% mile of a scheduled regular transit route in accordance with federal regulations. Residential areas north of the 1-210 and several employment centers south of Arrow Route need additional transit coverage. The City should work with Omnitrans to incorporate these route adjustments as part of their 2014 update to the short-range transportation plan. 6. FAIR HOUSING COMPLAINTS: Historically,the primary reason for housing discrimination complaints were race and ethnicity of the tenant. Beginning in the mid 2000's,the trend shifted to disability. This trend is not due to increased levels of discrimination but instead on a series of court decisions and expanded application to everyday life. For instance, new court decisions have made it clear that housing providers must be significantly more proactive in making reasonable accommodations to people with a disability. As society acquires a greater understanding of the subtleties of personal and societal bias, either through court decisions or personal experience, notions of what"discrimination and fair housing"is will change. To keep up with the latest trends,the City should workwith the IFHMB to adjust its public education programs, as needed, to focus on issues affecting people with disabilities. It is unclear whether this will be a new initiative or a redirecting of curreht resources. 7. FAIR LENDING PRACTICES: Fair housing concerns tend to arise when similarly situated applicants have different lending outcomes. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data show the lowest loan origination rates among low income buyers(with the exception of Hispanics)but the highest loan origination rates were for middle-income applicants. Black and Hispanics typically have the lowest loan origination rates as in past years,even after controlling for differences in household income. Whereas none of these statistics can prove equal opportunity or discrimination, they do provide an indication of characteristics and trends that may suggest further study, testing, or targeting of local government programs. 8. HATE CRIMES: Hate crimes are violent acts committed against people, property, or organizations motivated by the group to which they belong to or identify with. According to the Uniform Crime Reports published by the FBI, there have been no reported hate crimes in Rancho Cucamonga in many years—an unexpected finding given the sheer size of the community. San Bernardino County Sheriff staff confirmed this finding, but also noted that hate crimes are sometimes not reported to them or, if they are,they could be inadvertently reported under broader categories of crimes. This same type of problem exists in many City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P311 cities today. Therefore, the Al recommends that City staff work with the San Bernardino County Sheriff Department to examine and verify that recordkeeping is adequate in this regard. 9. SCHOOL VIOLENCE: Rancho Cucamonga is known for its safe and high performing schools. In recent years,schools across the country have experienced rising levels of violence that has become of considerable concern to parents. Violence at school is no longer confined to inner cities but is widespread, affecting communities of every size, location,and demographic. In response to an epidemic of harassment,violence, and suicides at schools, the California Legislature passed laws to prohibit harassment at public schools. Although Rancho Cucamonga schools are safer than most,still more than one in five students report being harassed every year due to their religion,disability,race/ethnicity,or other protected class. This Al therefore recommends that the City work with the Police Department to help augment school resource officer program,develop model programs(e.g., Building Bridges Program developed bythe Orange County Human Relations Commission), or pursue other innovative efforts. 10. RECORDKEEPING: Local governments are required under fair housing law to keep and maintain appropriate records so that fair housing issues can be identified and effectively addressed through appropriate interventions. During the course of this study,additional data was needed to diagnose potential concerns(e.g., hate crimes,types of complaints to IFHMB,etc.). In several cases,the data was not available to make a definite conclusion as to whether a program intervention was needed. Although the costs of data acquisition and maintenance can be very high, the City should look into modifying contracts with their service agencies to ensure that the appropriate type and level of detail in data are readily available. OBSTACLES TO MEETING UNDER-SERVED NEEDS The primary obstacle identified toward meeting under-served needs is a lack of available resources. This obstacle is and will continue to be an issue. The best way to address this matter is to combine efforts and resources and tap new funding sources. The City is striving to form public/private partnerships as well as seeking out new sources of funding, such as HOME funds to better leverage available funding. ACTIONS TO FOSTER AND MAINTAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING A majority of the objectives and actions identified as part of this Annual Action Plan are specifically aimed at increasing and maintaining the City's existing affordable housing stock. Activities such as new construction, conservation of at-risk units, and preservation of existing units are all striving to increase the affordable housing stock. ACTIONS TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING There were no significant barriers to affordable housing identified that would need to be revised or amended. All regulations and policies currently in-place are necessary in order to maintain the public health, safety, and welfare. ACTIONS TO EVALUATE AND REDUCE LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS In conjunction with the Home Improvement Program, the City will continue to implement federal requirements concerning lead-based paint reductions. HUD requires that for any program utilizing CDBG funds, all owners, and/or tenants be notified in writing about the dangers of lead-based paint. Units constructed priorto 1978,which are occupied by children underthe age of seven,are inspected for defective paint surfaces. If a child residing in the home has an elevated blood lead level, then defective chewable surfaces will be treated and lead abated. It is also recommended that housing rehabilitation efforts carried out by the RDA also follow the same guidelines. ACTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF POVERTY LEVEL FAMILIES The City has relatively little control over the manyfactors that mayaffect the determination of an individual's income level. The primary activity that may be utilized by the City is the support of public service agencies City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P312 that incorporate job training and life development skills into their programs, which includes most of the agencies currently receiving CDBG funding. The activities funded by the City, particularly those related to non-housing community development,act indirectly to increase economic development in the City. The City, through its CDBG contract activities,complies with Section 3 requirements encouraging the employment of local low-income individuals. From a housing perspective, all of the priorities, objectives, and programs aimed at increasing affordable housing also increase the stock of housing available to those in the lowest income categories. ACTIONS TO DEVELOP INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND ENHANCE COORDINATION The Consolidated Plan evaluated gaps in the institutional structure and actions that might be taken to strengthen the system. It was determined that one main action that can be taken toward this is increasing expertise of staff and City Council,which in turn will increase the CDBG program efficiency and effectiveness. Increased contact and coordination among City departments will also contribute to the CDBG program's effectiveness. The City will continue to encourage direct contact between itself and the Public Housing Agency and other service providers operating in the region. Most of the coordination efforts in the west end are tied to funding resources and the type of service provided. PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS Each yearthe City reviews the Annual Comprehensive Grant application submitted bythe Housing Authority whereby the City must certify consistency of the activities with the goals and objectives of the Consolidated Plan. MONITORING Monitoring serves as an effective tool to ensure that federal funds are spent in a manner consistent with the CDBG National Objectives and that the programs and projects are achieving stated goals. The following outlines basic monitoring requirements that are followed in the implementation of the CDBG program. Standards Utilized for Review: • Is the program meeting intended objectives? • Is the agency capable of tracking and/or documenting necessary benefit information and carrying out the responsibilities of its program consistent with federal requirements? • Is appropriate and accurate documentation submitted in a timely manner? Monitoring Procedures for Construction Projects —All construction projects are expected to comply with federal labor and procurement procedures as well as the various affirmative action and equal opportunity requirements required by various federal and state laws. To ensure this end, CDBG staff developed a Procurement and Contract Compliance Manual that outlines the various procedures and steps required as part of contract management. The CDBG coordinator oversees and reviews contract preparation at each step from bid preparation,contract document preparation, pre-construction meetings,and ongoing project inspections. Monitoring Procedures for Subrecipient Agencies—All Subrecipient agencies must sign a contract with the City in which the various scope of work, time line, and documentation requirements are outlined. On a monthly basis, each Subrecipient must submit detailed information regarding the number, ethnicity, and income level of individuals benefiting with CDBG funds. Quarterly summary reports are required of some agencies in which further information is provided on activities accomplished in that quarter. The City's monitoring goal is to conduct an on-site inspection of each agencyat leastonce a year,preferably toward the end of the funding cycle. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P313 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The preparation of a representative and useful Annual Action Plan is the result of an effective citizen participation process. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the participation of its residents in accordance with the provisions of its Citizen Participation Plan. The following steps were taken to ensure adequate public participation. 1. A public notice of available funds and soliciting project applications was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on December 18, 2012. Copies of the notice were also posted at City Hall and mailed to interested individuals and organizations. 2. Notice regarding the 30-day review period and availabilityof the draft 2013-2014Annual Action Plan and notice of the public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on April 2, 2013,identifying that the 2013 Annual Action Plan was available for public review and that the review period would run from Tuesday,April 2, 2013,to Wednesday, May 1, 2013. Letters providing notice of the public hearing and indicating the documents availability were mailed to surrounding jurisdictions, the County of San Bernardino, and the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino. Copies of the notice were posted at City Hall. The public hearing regarding the 2013 Annual Action Plan was held on May 1, 2013. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P314 HUD TABLES Table 3: Homeless and Special Needs Populations (HUD Table 1A) Continuum of Care: Housing Gap Analysis Chart Current Under Unmet Need/ Inventory Development Gap Individuals Example Emergency Shelter 100 40 26 Beds Emergency Shelter 4 0 30 Transitional Housing 0 0 0 Permanent Supportive Housing 0 0 0 Total 4 0 10 Persons in Families with Children Beds Emergency Shelter 4 0 30 Transitional Housing 0 0 0 Permanent Supportive Housing 0 ( 0 0 Total 4 0 10 Continuum of Care: Homeless Population and Subpopulations Chart Part 1:Homeless Population Sheltered Unsheltered Total Emergency Transitional Number of Families with Children(Family Households): 1. Number of Persons in Families with Children 14 14 2. Number of Single Individuals and Persons in 108 108 Households without children (Add Lines Numbered 1&2 Total Persons) 14 108 122 Part 2:Homeless Subpopulations Sheltered Unsheltered Total a. Chronically Homeless Unknown Unknown Unknown b. Seriously Mentally III Unknown c. Chronic Substance Abuse Unknown d. Veterans Unknown e. Persons with HIV/AIDS Unknown f. Victims of Domestic Violence Unknown g. Unaccompanied Youth(Under 18) Unknown City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P315 Table 4: Special Needs (Non-Homeless) Populations (HUD Table 113) SPECIAL NEEDS SUBPOPULATIONS Priority Need Unmet Dollars to Multi- Annual Level: High, Need Address Year Goals Medium, Low, Unmet Goals No Such Need Need Elderly H $225,000 y 24,000 Frail Elderly L $0 N 0 Severe Mental Illness N $0 N 0 Developmentally Disabled N $0 N 0 Physically Disabled H $150,000 y 10,000 Persons w/Alcohol/Other Drug Addictions L $0 N 0 Persons w/HIV/AIDS L $0 N 0 Victims of Domestic Violence H $84,000 Y 27,500 Other N $0 N 0 TOTAL $459,000 61,500 Priority Needs:H=High,M=Medium,L=Low,&N=No Such Need Table 5: Outcome/Objective Codes Performance Measurement Availability/Accessibility Affordability Sustainability Decent Housing DH-1 DH-2 DH-3 Suitable Living Environment SL-1 SL-2 SL-3 Economic Opportunity EO-1 EO-2 EO-3 Table 6:Summary of Specific Housing/Community Development Objectives(HUD Table 1A/16 Continuation Sheet) Obj. Specific Objectives Sources of Funds Performance Indicators Expected Actual Outcome/ M Number Number Objective* Homeless Objectives 7.1 Foothill Family Shelter CDBG Persons Assisted 20 SL-1 7.1 House of Ruth CDBG Persons Assisted 5,500 SL-3 7.1 Inland Hope Partners CDBG Persons Assisted 8,800 SL-3 SOVA Special Needs Objectives 8.1 Oldtimers Home CDBG Persons Assisted 240 DH-1 Maintenance Program 11.1 Oldtimers Senior Nutrition CDBG Persons Assisted 15,000 SL-3 9.1 Senior Services CDBG Persons Assisted 1,800 DH-1 11.1 Senior Transportation CDBG Persons Assisted 15,000 SL-3 Other Objectives City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P316 Table 7: Summary of Specific Objectives (HUD Table 1C)-Affordable Housing Specific Outcome/Objective Specific Objective sourceof Performance Year Expected Actual Percent Objective Funds Indicator Number Number Complete DH-1 Availability/Accessibility of Decent Housing 1.1 Support the acquisition of existing multi-family units to be held CHFA Multi-family 2010 0 0 0.0% for future affordable housing stock, housing units 2011 0 0 0.0% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=214 units) acquired 2012 0 0.0% 2013 0 0.0% 2014 0.0% fNUL41°YEAR�GOAL 0 0 1.2 Support the acquisition and rehabilitation of existing single- CHFA Single-family 2010 0 0 0.0% family homes. housing units 2011 0 0 0.0% (Consolidated Plan S-Year Goal=5 units) acquired 2012 0 0.0% 2013 0 0.0% 2014 0.0% N1UlTl EAR GOAL 0 0_ 2.1 Support the construction of affordable(multi-family)units. HOME Multi-family 2010 0 0 0.0% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=110 units) housing units 2011 0 0 0.0% developed 2012 0 0.0% 2013 0 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULTI=YEAR GOAL 0 0 2.2 Support the construction of single-family infill development in CHFA Single-family 2010 0 0 0.0% low-and moderate-income neighborhoods. housing units 2011 0 0 0.0% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=l0 units) developed 2012 0 0.0% 2013 1 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULTI�YEA0.GOAL �0 0 DH.2 Affordability of Decent Housing 3.1' Support the Housing Authority of San Bernardino Section 8 Federal Number of 2010 138 138 100.0% Voucher and public housing assistance programs. Housing housing units 2011 138 138 100.0% 'These figures are not cumulative,but represent the number Funds 2012 138 0.0% of units operated by the Housing Authority during the program 2013 138 0.0% year. 2014 0.0% M U I'VENZA PQG 0 M 0 MI 38 138 4.1 Administer a City sponsored First Time Homebuyer Program. N/A Number of 2010 15 0 0.0%' (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=75 units) housing units 2011 15 0 0.0% 2012 0 0.0% 2013 0 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULTI=YEAR GOAL 30 0 4.3 Assist the NHDC First Time Homebuyer Program, N/A Number of 2010 0 0 0.0% (Consolidated Plan S-Year Goal=l5 units) housing units 2011 0 0 0.0% 2012 0 0.0% 2013 0 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULTI-YEAR�GOAL DH-3 Sustainability of Decent Housing S.1 Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied,single- CDBG Housing units 2010 40 67 167.5% family and mobile homes for extremely low-,low-,and assisted 2011 40 S9 147.5% moderate-income homeowners. 2012 40 0.0% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=40 households) 2013 40 0.0% 2014 0.0% Mtl MM120M 126 5.2 Provide sewer connections to owner occupied,single-family CDBG Housing units 2010 5 0 0.0% and mobile homes for extremely low-,low-,and moderate- assisted 2011 0 0 0.0% income homeowners in the southwest Rancho Cucamonga 2012 0 0.0% area. 2013 0 0.0% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=50 units) 2014 0.0% MULTI-YEAR GOAL 5 0 6.1' Support programs of the Housing Authority of the County of Federal Housing units 2010 12 12 100.0% San Bernardino to improve living conditions for public housing Housing assisted 2011 12 12 100.0% residents. Funds 2012 12 0.0% These figures are not cumulative,but represent the number 2013 12 0.0% of units operated by the Housing Authority during the program 2014 0.0% year. MULTI-YEAR GOAL 12 12- City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan-Draft May 1,2013 P317 Table 8: Summary of Specific Objectives (HUD Table 1C)-Priority Homeless Needs Specific Outcome/Objective Specific Objective sourceof I Performance Year Ev :d Actual Percent Objective Funds Indicator Number Number Complete 7.1 Support of local homeless facilities and services SL-1 Availability/Accessibility of Suitable Living Environments Foothill Family Shelter (hh) CDBG Persons 1 2010 4 58 1,450.0% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=20) assisted 2011 4 28 700.0% 2012 4 0.0% 2013 0 0.0% 2014 0.0% MUL•TI�YEARfiOAL 12��86� SL-3 Sustainability of Suitable Living Environments House of Ruth (p) CDBG Persons 2010 1,100 1,235 112.2% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=5,500) assisted 2011 1,100 310 28.2% 2012 1,100 0.0% 2013 1,100 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULTI-YEAR GOAL 4,400 1,545 West End Hunger Program(SOYA) (p) CDBG Persons 2010 1,600 841 52.5% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=8,800) assisted 2011 1,600 863 53.9% 2012 1,600 0.0% 2013 11 600 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULTIYyYE_ARIG_O_AL 6,4_00 1,704 � TpTkLlol 8112 3 335 Table 9: Summary of Specific Objectives (HUD Table 1C)-Priority Non-Homeless Special Needs Specific Outcome/Objective Specific Objective source of I Performance I Year Expected Actual Percent Objective Funds Indicator Number Number Complete DH-1 Availability/Accessibility of Decent Housing 8.1 Provide minor and emergency rehabilitation services to FCDBG Housin g units 2010 60 43 71.6% eligible households with emphasis on assistance to low-and assisted 2011 60 40 66.6% moderate-income seniors. 2012 60 0.0% (Consolitlatetl Plan 5-Year Goal=240) 2013 0 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULTII=YEAR GOgL 180 9.1 Support special need services in areas where there are Persons 2010 1,800 7,365 409.1% significant under-served needs. assisted 2011 1,800 7,860 436.6% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=9,000) 2012 1,800 0.0% 2013 1,800 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULTI=YEAR GOAL El 7,200 15,225 Table 10: Summary of Specific Objectives (HUD Table 1C)-Non-Housing Community Development Needs Specific Outcome/Objective specific Objective Sourceof Performance Year Eapected Actual Percent Objective Fundz Indicator Number Number Complete 10.1 Complete all necessary infrastructure and sidewalk improvements in qualified target areas. SL-1 Availability/Accessibility of Suitable Living Environments Sidewalk Grinding and Replacement CDBG Sidewalk 2010 3,960 616 Li3lo% replaced 2011 3,960 516 2012 3,960 2013 3,960 2014 MULT.I_Y.EARjGO/i 15,Bb0 1,132 11.1 Assist public service agencies that support groups in the highest priority categories including:fair housing counseling,landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance,emergency shelters,domestic violence shelters,and senior,youth-at-risk,and literacy programs. SL-1 Availability/Accessibility of Suitable Living Environments Fair Housing CDBG Persons 2010 50 61 122.0% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=2,50) assisted 2011 50 77 154.0% 2012 50 0.0% 2013 50 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULTI YEARGOAL 200 138 Landlord/renant Mediation CDBG Persons 2010 550 718 130.5% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal 2,750) assisted 2011 SSo 675 122.7% 2012 550 0.0% 2013 550 0.0% 2014 0.0% IV C142 25200,: 1;393 . yr City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan-Draft May 1,2013 P318 Specific Outcome/Objective Specific Objective Source of Performance Year Expected Actual Percent Objective Funds Indicator Number Number Complete Youth-At-Risk(NOrthtown Collaborative) CDBG Persons 2010 3,250 5,572 171.4% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=16,250) assisted 2011 3,250 3,946 121.4% 2012 3,250 O.0% 2013 3,950 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULT.IMYE6030 L 13,700 9;518 [OTAL'Wf61100'MA%49]l SL-3 Sustainability of5uitable Living Environments Camp Fire USA CDBG People 2010 20 20 100.0% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=100) 2011 20 20 100.0% 2012 20 0.0% 2013 20 0.0% 2014 0.0% RMUITI"VE- GOAL 80 40 House of Ruth CDBG People 2010 1,600 1,235 77.1% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal 5,500) 2011 1,600 310 19.3% 2012 1,600 0.0% 2013 1,600 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULTI�IEAR GOAL 67400 i,,5G5 Inland Valley Hope Partners-SOVA CDBG People 2010 1,280 841 65.7% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=8,800) 2011 1,280 863 67.4% 2012 1,280 0.0% 2013 1,280 0.0% 2014 0.0% fNUL•TI°-„YEAR�GOAL 5,120 1,704 National CORE-Hope Through Housing CDBG People 2010 110 0 0.0% (Consolidated Plan S-Year Goal=550) 2011 110 309 280.9% 2012 110 0.0% 2013 0 1 0.0% 2014 0.0% MU bTIHYEARrGOAL 330 309 Project Sister Family Services CDBG People 2010 950 889 93.5% (Consolidated Plan S-Year Goal 23,750) 2011 950 981 103.2% 2012 950 0.0% 2013 950 0.0% 2014 0.0% MU-11- EAR GOAL 31800 1,870 Northtown/CASH CDBG Persons 2010 6,500 106 1.6% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal 32,500) assisted 2011 8,500 114 1.3% 2012 8,500 0.0% 2013 8,500 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULTI'-YEAR GOAL 32000 220 Senior Transportation CDBG People 2010 2,400 569 23.7% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=12,000) 2011 2,400 476 19.8% 2012 2,400 0.0% 2013 2,400 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULTImVEAR1GOAL 9600 3?OGS ONOW Back 2 Basics CDBG People 2010 110 141 128.1% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=550) 2011 110 210 190.9% 2012 110 0.0% 2013 110 0.0% 2014 0.0% INULT_1=YEAR'GOAL 440 351 Old inners Senior Nutrition CDBG People 2010 3,000 4,810 160.3% (Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal=15,000) 2011 3,000 4,725 157.5% 2012 3,000 0.0% 2013 3,000 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULThYEAR'GOAL 12;000 9,535 TC TALI M69377 M Wf61619a 19910"W( City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan-Draft May 1,2013 P319 Specific Outcome/Objective Specific Objective Sourceof I Performance I Year I Expected Actual Percent Objective Funds Indicator Number Number Complete DH-1 Availability/Accessibility of Decent Housing 12.1 Support the installation of handicap wheelchair ramps at all CDBG Square feet of 2010 2,880 600 20.8% curb returns. wheelchair 2011 2,880 588 20.4% ramps installed 2012 2,880 0.0% 2013 2,880 0.0% 2014 0.0% MUBTIIYEAR G — NUM5270Z OffITI-9871 _ DH-3 Sustainability of Decent Housing 13.1 Support the rehabilitation of significant historic structures, CDBG Public Facilities 2010 3 3 100.0% with primary emphasis on residential assistance. 2011 2 2 100.0% 2012 1 0.0% The multi year goal is not a yearly cumulative count as several 2013 0 0.0% projects were multi-year projects. To date,3 properties have 2014 0.0% received assistance. MULTIpYEAR GOAL 3 2 EO-3 Sustainability of Economic Opportunity 15.1 Support housing and Community Development activities that General Economic 2010 1 1 100.0% stimulate economic development. Fund development 2011 1 1 100.0% activities 2012 1 0.0% assisted 2013 1 0.0% 2014 0.0% MUbTI�Y R GOAL 1 NNm DH-3 Sustainability of Decent Housing 16.2 Support the City's Graffiti removal program operating in CDBG Square feet of 2010 15,000 26,720 178.1% qualified target areas. graffiti 2011 15,000 10,985 73.2% (Expected and Actual are represented in square feet of graffiti removed 2012 15,000 0.0% removed.) 2013 15,000 0.0% 2014 0.0% MULTI EAR GOAL 60;000 37,705 163 Support the City's Code Enforcement Program operating in CDBG Units 2010 100 150 150.0% qualified target areas. 2011 100 180 180.0% 2012 0 0 0.0% 2013 0 0 0.0% 2014 0 0.0% Qfll1L•TI—YEAR GOaI 2DD 330 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P320 Table 11: Priority Housing Needs/Investment Plan Table (HUD Table 2A) PRIORITY HOUSING NEEDS Priority Unmet Need (households) 0-30% H 355 Small Related 31-50% H 451 51-80% M 791 0-30% H 70 Large Related 31-50% H 105 51-80% M 303 Renter 0-30% H 222 Elderly 31-50% H 133 51-80% M 136 0-30% H 210 All Other 31-50% H 231 51-80% M 566 0-30% H 731 Owner 31-50% H 975 51-80% M 1,928 Elderly 0-80% H Frail Elderly 0-80% H Non-Homeless Severe Mental Illness 0-80% L Special Needs Physical Disability 0-80% L Developmental Disability 0-80% L Alcohol/Drug Abuse 0-80% L HIV/AIDS 0-80% L Victims of Domestic Violence 0-80% H City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P321 Table 11: Priority Housing Needs/Investment Plan Table (HUD Table 2A Cont.) Priority Need 5-Yr. Yr. 1 Yr.2 Yr.3 Yr.4 Yr.5 Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Plan/Act Plan/Act Plan/Act Plan/Act Plan/Acct Plan/Act Renters 0-30%of AMI 0 0 0 1 0 31-50%of AMI 107 0 0 0 51-80%of AMI 217 0 0 0 Owners 0-30%of AMI 0 0 0 0 31-50%of AMI 8 0 0 0 51-80%of AMI 7 0 _ 0 0 Homeless` Individuals 0 0 0 _ _ 0 Families 20 4 4 4 Non-Homeless Special Needs Elderly 24,000 4,800 4,800 4,800 Frail Elderly 0 0 0 0 Severe Mental Illness 0 0 0 0 Physical Disability 10,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Developmental Disability 0 0 0 0 Alcohol/Drug Abuse 0 0 0 0 HIV/AIDS 2 2 0 0 Victims of Domestic Violence 27,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 Total Total Section 215 0 0 0 0 215 Renter 0 0 0 0 215 Owner 0 0 0 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P322 Table 11: Priority Housing Needs/Investment Plan Table (HUD Table 2A Cont.) Priority Need 5-Yr. Yr.1 Yr.2 Yr.3 Yr.4 Yr.5 Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Plan/Act Plan/Act Plan/Act Plan/Act _ PI 'Act Plan/Act CDBG Acquisition of existing rental units 219 0 0 0 Production of new rental units 120 0 0 0 Rehabilitation of existing rental units 0 0 0 0 Rental assistance 0 0 0 0 Acquisition of existing owner units 0 0 0 0 Production of new owner units 0 0 0 0 Rehabilitation of existing owner units 500 100 100 100 Homeownership assistance 0 1 0 0 0 HOME Acquisition of existing rental units 0 0 0 0 Production of new rental units 0 0 0 0 Rehabilitation of existing rental units 0 0 0 0 Rental assistance 0 0 0 0 Acquisition of existing owner units 0 0 0 0 Production of new owner units 0 0 0 0 Rehabilitation of existing owner units 0 0 0 0 Homeownership assistance 0 1 0 1 0 0 j HOPWA Rental assistance 0 0 0 0 Short term rent/mortgage utility 0 0 0 0 payments Facility based housing development 0 0 0 0 Facility based housing operations 0 0 0 0 Supportive services 0 0 0 0 Other City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 30 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P323 Table 12: Priority Community Development Needs (HUD Table 213) Priority Need Priority Unmet Dollars to 5 Y Annual Goal Percent Goal Need Level Priority Address Goal Plan/Act Completed Need Need Plan/Act Acquisition of Real Property N 0 $0 Disposition N 0 $0 Clearance and Demolition N 0 $0 Clearance of Contaminated Sites N 0 $0 Code Enforcement M 3 $270,000 Public Facility(General) H Senior Centers N 0 $0 Handicapped Centers N 0 $0 Homeless Facilities N 0 $0 Youth Centers N 0 $0 Neighborhood Facilities N 0 $0 Child Care Centers N 0 $0 Health Facilities N 0 $0 Mental Health Facilities N 0 $0 Parks and/or Recreation Facilities N 0 $0 Parking Facilities N 0 $0 Tree Planting N 0 $0 Fire Stations/Equipment N 0 $0 Abused/Neglected Children Facilities N 0 $0 Asbestos Removal N 0 $0 Non-Residential Historic Preservation M 3 $500,000 Other Public Facility Needs N 0 $0 Infrastructure(General) H Water/Sewer Improvements H 50 $1,050,000 Street Improvements H 2 $1,500,000 Sidewalks H 5 $110,000 Solid Waste Disposal Improvements N 0 $0 Flood Drainage Improvements N 0 $0 Other Infrastructure N 0 $0 Public Services(General) H Senior Services M 27,000 $150,000 Handicapped Services N 0 $0 Legal Services N 0 $0 Youth Services H 3,500 $85,000 Child Care Services N 0 $0 Transportation Services M 15,000 $88,000 Substance Abuse Services N 0 $0 Employment/Training Services M 550 $25,000 Health Services N 0 $0 Lead Hazard Screening M 200 $120,000 Crime Awareness N 0 $0 Fair Housing Activities H 1,250 $58,000 Tenant Landlord Counseling H 250 $50,000 Other Services M 0 $0 Economic Development(General) L C/I Land Acquisition/Disposition N 0 $0 C/I Infrastructure Development N 0 $0 C/I Building Acq/Const/Rehab N 0 $0 Other C/I N 0 $0 ED Assistance to For-Profit N 0 $0 ED Technical Assistance N 0 $0 Micro-enterprise Assistance N 0 $0 Other N 0 $0 Priority Needs:H=High,M=Medium,L=Low,&N=No Such Need City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 31 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P324 Table 13:Summary of Specific Housing/Community Development Objectives(HUD Table 2A/26 Continuation Sheet Objtt Specific Objectives Sources of Performance Expected Actual Outcome/ Funds Indicators _ Number Number Objective' Rental Housing 1.1 Support the acquisition of existing RDA,PHA Units 214 0 DH-1 multiple-family units to be held for future affordable housing stock. 2.1 Support the construction of affordable RDA,HOME, Units 110 225 DH-1 (multi-family)units. UTC,FNMA 3.1 Support the Housing Authority of San HACSB Units 138 138 DH-2 Bernardino County Section 8 Voucher and public housing assistance programs. 3.2 Participate in the HOME Consortium HOME Units Unknown 0 DH-2 Tenant-Based Rental Assistance program. 5.3 Participate in the HOME Consortium HOME Units Unknown 0 DH-2 Affordable Housing Development Loan Program. 6.1 Support programs of the Housing HACSB Units 12 12 DH-2 Authority of the County of San Bernardino to improve living conditions for public housing residents. Owner Housing 1.2 Support the acquisition and RDA Units 5 0 DH-1 rehabilitation of existing single family homes. 2.1 Support the construction of single- RDA Units 30 0 DH-1 family infill development in low-and moderate-income neighborhoods. 4.1 Administer a City sponsored First Time RDA Units 75 0 DH-2 Homebuyer Program. 4.2 Participate in the HOME Consortium HOME Units Unknown 0 DH-2 Homeownership Assistance Program. 73 Assist the NHDC First Time Homebuyer RDA Units 15 0 DH-2 Program. 5.1 Provide moderate rehabilitation of CDBG Units 200 67 DH-3 owner occupied,single-family and mobile homes for extremely low-,low-, and moderate-income homeowners. 5.2 Provide sewer connections to owner CDBG Units 50 0 DH-3 occupied,single-family,extremely low-, low-,and moderate-income homeowners in the southwest Rancho Cucamonga area. 8.1 Provide minor and emergency CDBG Units 300 22 DH-1 rehabilitation services to eligible households with emphasis on assisting low-and moderate-income seniors. 16.1 Support improvements to residential CDBG Units 200 Unk DH-3 energy efficiency,lead-based paint hazard reduction,and code enforcement through the City's Home Improvement Program. Community Development Infrastructure 10.1 1 Support infrastructure and sidewalk CDBG Projects 7 Unk SL-1 improvements in qualified target areas. I _ 12.1 Support the installation of handicap I CDBG I Projects 5 Unk DH-1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 32 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P325 wheelchair ramps at all curb returns. Public Facilities Public Services 7.1 Support local homeless facilities and CDBG People 12,570 Unk SL-1,SL-3 services. 9.1 Support special needs services in areas CDBG People 9,000 Unk DH-1 where there are significant under- served needs. 11.1 Support public service agencies that CDBG People 23,000 Unk SL-1,5L-3 assist groups in the highest priority categories including:fair housing counseling,landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters,domestic violence shelters,and senior,youth-at-risk,and literacy programs. Economic Development 15.1 1 Support housing and Community General Fund, Projects Unknown Unk EO-3 Development activities that stimulate RDA economic development. Neighborhood Revitalization/Other 13.1 Support the rehabilitation of significant CDBG Projects 3 3 DH-3 historic structures,with primary emphasis on residential assistance. 16.2 Support the City's Graffiti Removal CDBG Sq Ft Removed 75,000 Unk DH-3 Program operating in qualified target areas. 16.3 Support the City's Code Enforcement CDBG People 100 Unk DH-3 Program operating in qualified target areas. 1.Refer to the Outcome/Objective Codes Table City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 33 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P326 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Provide the necessary planning and administrative capacity to implement the CDBG program and the Consolidated Plan. Project Provide for the necessary planning and administrative activities of the CDBG program. Activity Administration Description Includes administration of the CDBG program, the completion of program applications and performance reports, research and analysis, target area studies, historic preservation evaluations, and housing documents. Objective Category ❑ Suitable Living Environment ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ❑ Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability Location/TargetArea: Community Wide (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding Source: 0001 CDBG $152,521.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 21A General Program Administration 570.206 HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Local Government N/A Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prioryear Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA N/A N/A Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $152,521.00 1228 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS❑Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 34 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P327 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Provide improvements to public areas and public facilities to enhance living environments, improve the quality of life in low-and moderate-income neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals, seniors, and the handicapped. Ensure accessibility to all public facilities and structures. Project Support the installation of handicap wheelchair ramps at all curb returns. Activity Rancho Cucamonga PWSD—Wheelchair Ramps Description This program involves the retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate disabled individuals. Objective Category ❑ Suitable Living Environment ® Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ® Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability, Location/TargetArea: Community Wide (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding source: DH-1 0002 CDBG $21,660.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 03L Sidewalks 570.201(c) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Local Government 570.208(a)(2)—Low/Mod Limited Clientele Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior Year Funds $1,190.00 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA Public Facilities 2,880 linear feet Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $22,850.00 1017 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless[—]Persons with HIV/AIDS®Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 35 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P328 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Provide improvements to public areas and public facilities to enhance living environments, improve the quality of life in low-and moderate-income neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals, seniors, and the handicapped. Ensure accessibility to all public facilities and structures. Project Support infrastructure and sidewalk improvements in qualified target areas. Activity Rancho CucamongaPWSD—SidewalkGrinding Description Involves the grinding, repair, or replacement of sidewalks that are displaced and/or inaccessible in qualified target areas. Objective Category ® Suitable Living Environment ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ® Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability, CT 8.12 BG 2, CT 20.04 BG 1, CT 20.05 BG 1, CT 21.00 BG's 2, 3, 4, 6, & 7, and CT Location/Target Area: 22.03 BG 1 (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding Source: SL-1 0003 CDBG $21,660.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 03L Sidewalks 570.202(c) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Local Government 570.208(a)(1)—Low/Mod Area Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior Year Funds $1,190.00 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing . Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA Public Facilities 3,960 linear feet Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $22,850.00 1018 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS®Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 36 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P329 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Owner households with incomes below 80 percent of the median with substandard housing. Project Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and mobile homes for extremely low-, low-, and moderate-income homeowners. Activity Home Improvement Program Description The City has an existing moderate rehabilitation Home Improvement Program available to eligible owner-occupied households, those earning less than 80 percent of the AMI. The program offers deferred payment loans of up to $30,000 and grants of up to$7,500, including emergency repair grants. The City runs this as a full service program and not only lends the money, but secures contractors, oversees the work, and maintains project administration. While this method requires additional staff time, it is done to provide a high level of customer service and ensure both consistent and efficient results. Objective Category ❑ Suitable Living Environment ® Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ❑ Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ® Sustainability Location/TargetArea: Community Wide (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding Source: DH-3 0004 CDBG $452,374.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 14A Rehab;Single Unit Residential 570.202 HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Local Government 570.208(a)(3)—Low/Mod Housing Benefit Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior year Funds $21,904.84 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA Housing Units 40 Other Funding $23,043.67 Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $495,322.51 1230 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless[]Persons with HIV/AIDS❑Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 37 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P330 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Youth services, fair housing counseling, tenant/landlord counseling, as well as other public services. Project Support the City's Graffiti Removal Program operating in qualified target areas. Activity Rancho Cucamonga PWSD—Graffiti Removal Description The removal of incidents of graffiti from public properties in qualified target areas. Objective Category ❑ Suitable Living Environment ® Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ❑ Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ® Sustainability CT 8.12 BG 2, CT 20.04 BG 1, CT 20.05 BG 1, CT 21.00 BG's 2, 3, 4, 6, & 7, and CT Location/Target Area: 22.03 BG 1 (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding5ource: DH-3 0005 CDBG $16,400.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 05 Public Services(General) 570.201(e) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Local Government 570.208(a)(1)—Low/Mod Area Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior year Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA Feet of Public Utilities 15,000 square feet Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $16,400.00 1015 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS❑Personswith Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 38 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P331 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Youth services, fair housing counseling, tenant/landlord counseling, as well as other public services. Project Support public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity IFHMB—Landlord/Tenant Counseling Description Landlord/Tenant dispute mediation services are provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board. Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board is located at 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 101, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Objective Category ® suitable Living Environment ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ® Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability Location/TargetArea: Community Wide (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding source: SL-1 0006 CDBG $7,400.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 05K Tenant/Landlord Counseling 570.201(e) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Subrecipient Private 570.500(c) 570.208(a)(2)—Low/Mod Limited Clientele Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior Year Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA People 422 Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $7,400.00 1023 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS❑Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 39 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P332 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need 1. Assessment, outreach, and emergency shelter for families, individuals, and persons with special needs. 2. Youth services, fair housing counseling, tenant/landlord counseling, as well as other public services. Project 1. The City supports a variety of organizations that provide immediate assistance, advocacy, and short-term shelter to homeless individuals and families. The City will continue to address priority needs, and will continue to evaluate the provision of transitional shelter assistance. 2. Support public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior,youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity House of Ruth Description House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency hotline, emergency shelter for up to 45 days, transitional shelter for up to 2 years, and case management and domestic violence support services at conveniently located walk-in centers. House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711. Objective Category ® Suitable Living Environment ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ❑ Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ® sustainability Location/Target Area: Community Wide (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding Source: SL-3&SL-1 0007 CDBG $5,700.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 05G Battered and Abused Spouses 570.201(e) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Subrecipient Private 570.500(c) 570.208(a)(2)—Low/Mod Limited Clientele Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior Year Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA People(General) 217 Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $5,700.00 1032 The primary purpose of this project is to help:®the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS❑Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 40 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P333 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need 1. Assessment, outreach, and emergency shelter for families, individuals, and persons with special needs. 2. Youth services, fair housing counseling,tenant/landlord counseling, as well as other public services. Project 1. The City supports a variety of organizations that provide immediate assistance, advocacy, and short-term shelter to homeless individuals and families. The City will continue to address priority needs, and will continue to evaluate the provision of transitional shelter assistance. 2. Support public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity Inland Valley Council of Churches,dba, Inland Valley Hope Partners—SCIVA Description SOVA offers a 5-day food supply (15 meals)for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. The IVCC offers the West End Hunger Program from offices located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. Objective Category ® Suitable Living Environment ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ❑ Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ® Sustainability Location/Target Area: Community Wide (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding source: SL-3&SL-1 0008 CDBG $5,300.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation E5G 05 Public Services(General) 570.201(e) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Subrecipient Private 570.500(c) 570.208(a)(2)—Low/Mod Limited Clientele Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior Year Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA People(General) 1,000 Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $5,300.00 1046 The primary purpose of this project is to help:®the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS[]Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 41 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P334 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Provide non-housing related special needs assistance to all low- and moderate- income special needs groups. Project Support special need services in areas where there are significant under-served needs. Activity Rancho Cucamonga CSD—Senior Services Description Develop and enhance senior citizen classes and activities in the focus areas of physical fitness, recreational and educational development, mental health, and emotional well-being. This service is provided through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department. Objective Category ❑ Suitable Living Environment ® Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ® Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ sustainability Location/Target Area: Community Wide program at James L. Brulte Senior Center (Street Address): 11200 Base Line Road (City, State, Zip Code): Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding Source: DH-1 0009 CDBG 510,400.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 05A Senior Services 570.201(e) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Local Government 570.208(a)(2)—Low/Mod Limited Clientele Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior year Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA People(General) 858 Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $10,400.00 1110 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS[]Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 42 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P335 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Youth services, fair housing counseling, tenant/landlord counseling, as well as other public services. Project Support public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including:fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity Steelworker Oldtimers Foundation—Senior Nutrition Description The nutrition program is run from the Senior Center and provides meals prepared at the RC Senior Center and also provides meals prepared for home delivery. Steelworker Oldtimers Foundation is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335. Objective Category ® Suitable Living Environment ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ® Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability Location/Target Area: Community Wide program run from the James L. Brulte Senior Center (Street Address): 11200 Base Line Road (City, State, Zip Code): Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding Source: SL-1 0010 CDBG $8,400.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 05A Senior Services 570.201(e) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Subrecipient Private 570.500(c) 570.208(a)(2)—Low/Mod Limited Clientele Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior Year Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA People(General) 1,800 Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $8,400.00 1183 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS[—]Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 43 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P336 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Youth services, fair housing counseling, tenant/landlord counseling, as well as other public services. Project Support public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity Rancho Cucamonga Public Library—Back to Basics Description The Back to Basic program trains volunteer tutors to work with 7 to 12-year old children identified by school personnel as at-risk (challenged economically and educationally) and who are reading and writing below their grade levels. The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library has two locations, the Archibald Branch is located at 7368 Archibald Avenue, and the Biane Library is located at 11505 Cultural Center Drive. Objective Category ® Suitable Living Environment ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ® Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Location/Target Area: Archibald Branch Biane Library (Street Address): 7368 Archibald Avenue 11505 Cultural Center Drive (City, State, Zip Code): Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding Source: SL-1 0011 CDBG $7,990.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 05 Public Services(General) 570.201(e) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Local Government 570.208(a)(2)—Low/Mod Limited Clientele Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prioryear Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA People(General) 140 Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $7,990.00 1218 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS❑Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 44 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P337 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Youth services, fair housing counseling, tenant/landlord counseling, as well as other public services. Project Support public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity IFHMB—Fair Housing Description Fair Housing services include education, counseling, mediation, and legal referral. Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board is located at 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 101, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Objective Category ® Suitable Living Environment ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ® Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability Location/Target Area: Community Wide (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding Source: SL-1 0012 CDBG $8,800.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG O5J Fair Housing Activities 570.201(e) HOME (Subject to Public Services Cap) Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Subrecipient Private 570.500(c) 570.208(a)(2)—Low/Mod Limited Clientele Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior Year Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA People 52 Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $8,800.00 1229 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS❑Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 45 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P338 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Youth services, fair housing counseling, tenant/landlord counseling, as well as other public services. Project Support public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity Project Sister Family Services Description Project Sister provides sexual assault and violence prevention by working with teens addressing date rape, sexual harassment, and personal safety awareness, and working with seniors, who are vulnerable sexual assault, robbery, burglary, and financial exploitation. Project Sister is located at P.O. Box 1390, Claremont, CA 91711. Objective Category ® Suitable Living Environment ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ® Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability Location/Target Area: Community Wide (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding Source: SL-1 0013 CDBG $6,900.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 05G Battered and Abused Spouses 570.201(e) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Subrecipient Private 570.500(c) 570.208(a)(2)—Low/Mod Limited Clientele Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior year Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA People(General) 1,200 Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $6,900.00 1333 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS❑Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 46 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P339 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Youth services, fair housing counseling, tenant/landlord counseling, as well as other public services. Project Support public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity Camp Fire Inland Southern California Council Description The program provides a 5-day resident camp session to learn responsibility, develop skills, and gain confidence while building independence and self- reliance. The camp session is run at Camp Nawakwa, located in the Barton Flats recreation area of the San Bernardino Mountains. Camp Fire Inland Southern California Council is located at 9037 Arrow Route, Suite 140, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Objective Category ® Suitable Living Environment ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ® Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability Location/Target Area: (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding Source: SL-1 0014 CDBG $5,900.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG OSD Youth Services 570.201(e) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Subrecipient Private 570.500(c) 570.208(a)(2)—Low/Mod Limited Clientele Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior Year Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA People(General) 40 Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $5,900.00 1334 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless[—]Persons with HIV/AIDS❑Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 47 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P340 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Youth services, fair housing counseling, tenant/landlord counseling, as well as other public services. Project Support public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity Rancho Cucamonga CSD—Northtown Collaborative Description The Northtown Collaborative is a community (youth and adult) prevention recreation/human services program provides essential human service programs as well as traditional recreational classes and activities. The program is conducted through a joint use agreement with the Rancho Cucamonga Middle School, 10022 Feron Boulevard, and NHDC, 10071 Feron Boulevard. The Community Services Department is located at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Objective Category ® Suitable Living Environment ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ® Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability Northtown Area, south of Foothill, east of Grove, and west of Haven. Location/Target Area: Target Area 1 (CT 21.00, BG 2, 3, 4, 6, &7) (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding Source: SL-1 0015 CDBG $8,800.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 05 Public Services 570.201(e) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Local Government 570.208(a)(2)—Low/Mod Limited Clientele Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior year Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA People(General) 3,950 Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $8,800.00 1379 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS❑Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 48 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P341 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Youth services, fair housing counseling, tenant/landlord counseling, as well as other public services. Project Support public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including:fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity Rancho Cucamonga CSD—Senior Transportation Description The Silver Fox Express program offers door-to-door para-transit service for senior citizens living in Rancho Cucamonga. The programs primary focus is to bring isolated seniors to the James L. Brulte Senior Center for the daily nutrition program and senior classes, programs, and workshops. The Community Services Department is located at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Objective Category Suitable Living Environment ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability Location/TargetArea: Community Wide (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding Source: SL-1 0016 CDBG $15,400.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 05A Senior Services 570.201(e) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Local Government 570.208(a)(2)—Low/Mod Limited Clientele Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prioryear Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA People(General) 1,680 Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $15,400.00 1784 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS❑Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 49 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P342 Table 14: Consolidated Plan Listing of Projects (HUD Table 3C Cont.) Jurisdiction's Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Priority Need Youth services, fair housing counseling, tenant/landlord counseling, as well as other public services. Project Support public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity Rancho Cucamonga CMO—Northtown/CASA Description The Cocinando Amigos Saludables y Alegres (CASA) program provides a bi- lingual healthy eating/cooking program to educate and support Latino families in the Northtown neighborhood of the City, to prepare traditional food that is healthier and more nutritious, as a strategy to prevent diabetes and obesity. The Rancho Cucamonga City Manager's Office currently coordinates the CASA program at the Northtown Community Center, located at 10071 Feron Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Objective Category ® Suitable Living Environment ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ® Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability Northtown Area, south of Foothill, east of Grove, and west of Haven. Location/Target Area: Target Area 1 (CT 21.00, BG 2, 3, 4, 6, &7) (Street Address): (City, State, Zip Code): Specific Objective Number Project ID Funding Source: SL-1 0017 CDBG $7,000.00 HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ESG 05 Public Services(General) 570.201(e) HOME Type of Recipient CDBG National Objective HOPWA Local Government 570.208(a)(2)—Low/Mod Limited Clientele Total Formula Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Completion Date(mm/dd/yyyy) Prior year Funds 07/01/2013 06/30/2014 Assisted Housing Performance Indicator Annual Units PHA People(General) 8,500 Other Funding Local ID Units Upon Completion Total $7,000.00 1785 The primary purpose of this project is to help:❑the Homeless❑Persons with HIV/AIDS❑Persons with Disabilities❑Public Housing Needs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 50 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P343 ATTACHMENTS SUPPORTING MAP—LOW/MOD INCOME THRESHOLD CENSUS TRACT BLOCK GROUPS Figure 1: Low/Mod Income Threshold Census Tract Block Groups r J i R R WSI u.. r. erLs: ®z [cr 21.00 crtus w� vnts M31 Bti4 Ally ®a .. crass e p' azuo a:tr �y 'ees r r IVU a 'LA a City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 51 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P344 APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (HUD FORM SF-424) City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 52 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 OMB Number 4040-000445 Expiration Date: 01/31/2009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02 '1. Type of Submission: •2. Type of Application If Revision,select appropriate letter(s) ❑ Preapplication ❑ New ® Application ® Continuation 'Other(Specify) ❑ Changed/Corrected Application ❑ Revision 3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier: b-13-MC-06-0556 5a. Federal Entity Identifier: •5b. Federal Award Identifier: State Use Only: 6. Date Received by State: 7. State Application Identifier: 8. APPLICANT INFORMATION: 'a. Legal Name: City of Rancho Cucamonga 'b. Employer(faxpayer Identification Number(EIN/TIN): c. Organizational DUNS: 95-3213002 007052970 d. Address: 'Street 1: 10500 Civic Center Drive Street 2: 'City: Rancho Cucamonga County: San Bernardino 'State: CA Province: 'Country: _ *Zip/Postal Code: 91730 e. Organizational Unit: Department Name: Division Name: Planning Department f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application: Prefix: Mr. 'First Name: Thomas Middle Name: *Last Name: Grahn Suffix: Title: Associate Planner Organizational Affiliation: City of Rancho Cucamonga 'Telephone Number: 909.477.2750 Fax Number: 909.477.2847 'Email: tom.grahn @cityofrc.us P346 OMB Number: 4040-0004 Expiration Date: 01/31/2009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02 '9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type: C. City or Township Government Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type: Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type: 'Other(Specify): '10. Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 14.218 CFDA Title: HCDA-Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)Entitlement '12 Funding Opportunity Number: `Title: 13. Competition Identification Number: Title: 14. Areas Affected by Project(Cities,Counties, States,etc.): City wide CDBG program. `15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project: Housing Rehabilitation; Historic Preservation; Handicap, Street,and Public Facility Improvements;and Public Services(Including: Fair Housing, Landlord Tenant Counseling, Graffiti Removal, Homeless Assistance, Domestic Violence Assistance,Senior,Youth, and Literacy Programs). P347 OMB Number: 4040-0004 Expiration Date: 01/31/2009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02 16. Congressional Districts Of: 'a. Applicant: CA-026 'b. Program/Project: CA-026 17. Proposed Project: 'a. Start Date: 07/0112013 'b. End Date: 06/30/2014 16. Estimated Funding($): 'a. Federal $762,605 'b. Applicant 'c. State 'd. Local 'e. Other 'f. Program Income 'g. TOTAL $762,605 '19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process? ❑ a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on_. ❑ b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review. ® c. Program is not covered by E. O. 12372. '20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If"Yes", provide explanation.) ❑ Yes ® No 21. 'By signing this application, I certify(1)to the statements contained in the list of certifications"and(2)that the statements herein are true,complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances"and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil,or administrative penalties. (U. S. Code,Title 218,Section 1001). ® "I AGREE The list of certifications and assurances,or an intemet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions. Authorized Representative: Prefix: Mr. 'First Name: Dennis Middle Name: `Last Name: Michael Suffix: 'Title: Mayor 'Telephone Number: 909.477.2700 Fax Number: 909.477.2847 'Email: `Signature of Authorized Representative: -Date Signed: 05/01/2013 Authorized For Local Reproduction Standard Forth 424(Revised 10/2005) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 P348 OMB Number: 4040-0004 Expiration Date: 01/31/2009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02 *Applicant Federal Debt Delinquency Explanation The following should contain an explanation if the Applicant organization is delinquent of any Federal Debt. P349 CERTIFICATIONS In accordance with the applicable statutes and the regulations governing the consolidated plan regulations, the jurisdiction certifies that: Affirmatively Further Fair Housing—The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing,which means it will conduct an analysis of impediments to fair housing choice within the jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis,and maintain records reflecting that analysis and actions in this regard. Anti-displacement and Relocation Plan—Itwill comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and implementing regulations at 49 CFR 24; and it has in effect and is following a residential antidisplacement and relocation assistance plan required under section 104(d)of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, in connection with any activity assisted with funding under the CDBG or HOME programs. Drug Free Workplace—It will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by: 1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture,distribution,dispensing, possession,or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; 2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about— (a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (b) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; (c) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and (d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; 3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1; 4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph 1 that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will— (a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (b) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; 5. Notifying the agency in writing,within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant; 6. Taking one of the following actions,within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted: (a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or City of Rancho Cucamonga Certifications-Page 1 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P350 (b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal,State,or local health,law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; 7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs 1, 2, 3,4, 5, and 6. Anti-Lobbying—To the best of the jurisdiction's knowledge and belief: 1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it,to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency,a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract,the making of any Federal grant,the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency,a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract,grant, loan,or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and 3. It will require that the language of paragraph 1 and 2 of this anti-lobbying certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers(including subcontracts,subgrants,and contracts under grants, loans,and cooperative agreements)and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Authority of Jurisdiction—The consolidated plan is authorized under State and local law(as applicable)and the jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which I t is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations. Consistency with plan—The housing activities to be undertaken with CDBG, HOME,ESG,and HOPWAfunds are consistent with the strategic plan. Section 3 — It will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 135. May 1, 2013 L. Dennis Michael Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City of Rancho Cucamonga Certifications-Page 2 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P351 Specific CDBG Certifications The Entitlement Community certifies that: Citizen Participation—It is in full compliance and following a detailed citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of 24 CFR 91.105. Community Development Plan — Its consolidated housing and community development plan identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short-term and long-term community development objectives that provide decent housing,expand economic opportunities primarily for persons of low and moderate income. (See CFR 24 570.2 and CFR 24 part 570). Following a Plan — It is following a current consolidated plan (or Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) that has been approved by HUD. Use of Funds—It has complied with the following criteria: 1. Maximum Feasible Priority. With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG funds, it certifies that it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available); 2. Overall Benefit. The aggregate use of CDBG funds including section 108 guaranteed loans during program year 2013 (a period specified by the grantee consisting of one, two, or three specific consecutive program years), shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the amount is expended for activities that benefit such persons during the designated period; 3. Special Assessments. It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements. However, if CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of public improvements(assisted in part with CDBG funds)financed from other revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. The jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds, including Section 108, unless CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of fee or assessment attributable to the capital costs of public improvements financed from other revenue sources. In this case,an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. Also, in the case of properties owned and occupied by moderate-income(not low-income)families,an assessment or charge may be made against the property for public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG funds to cover the assessment. Excessive Force—It has adopted and is enforcing: 1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and 2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within City of Rancho Cucamonga Certifications-Page 3 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P352 its jurisdiction; Compliance With Anti-discrimination laws—The grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d), the Fair Housing Act (42 USC 3601-3619), and implementing regulations. Lead-Based Paint—Its activities concerning lead-based paint will comply with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 35, subparts A, B,1, K, and R; Compliance with Laws—It will comply with applicable laws. May 1, 2013 L. Dennis Michael Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City of Rancho Cucamonga Certifications-Page 4 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P353 Appendix to Certifications INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING LOBBYING AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS: A. Lobbying Certification This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352,title 31, U.S.Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than$10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. B. Drug-Free Workplace Certification 1. By signing and/or submitting this application or grant agreement, the grantee is providing the certification. 2. The certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance is placed when the agency awards the grant. If it is later determined that the grantee knowingly rendered a false certification,or otherwise violates the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act, HUD, in addition to any other remedies available to the Federal Government, may take action authorized under the Drug-Free Workplace Act. 3. Workplaces under grants,for grantees other than individuals,need not be identified on the certification. If known,they may be identified in the grant application. If the grantee does not identify the workplaces at the time of application, or upon award, if there is no application, the grantee must keep the identity of the workplace(s) on file in its office and make the information available for Federal inspection. Failure to identify all known workplaces constitutes a violation of the grantee's drug-free workplace requirements. 4. Workplace identifications must includethe actual address of buildings(or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the grant takes place. Categorical descriptions may be used (e.g., all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State highway department while in operation,State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio stations). 5. If the workplace identified to the agency changes during the performance of the grant,the grantee shall inform the agency of the change(s), if it previously identified the workplaces in question (see paragraph three). 6. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s)for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant: Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code) Check if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here. The certification with regard to the drug-free workplace is required by 24 CFR Part 24, subpart F. Place Name Street City County State Zip 7. Definitions of terms in the Nonprocurement Suspension and Debarment common rule and City of Rancho Cucamonga Certifications-Page 5 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 P354 Drug-Free Workplace common rule apply to this certification. Grantees'attention is called, in particular, to the following definitions from these rules: "Controlled substance" means a controlled substance in Schedules I through V of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and as further defined by regulation (21 CFR 1308.11 through 1308.15); "Conviction" means a finding of guilt(including a plea of nolo contendere)or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes; "Criminal drug statute" means a Federal or non-Federal criminal statute involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, use, or possession of any controlled substance; "Employee"means the employee of grantee directly engaged in the performance of work under a grant, including: (i) All "direct charge" employees; (ii) All"indirect charge" employees unless their impact or involvement is insignificant to the performance of the grant;and (iii) Temporary personnel and consultantswho are directlyengagedin the performance of work under the grant and who are on the grantee's payroll. This definition does not include workers not on the payroll of the grantee(e.g.,volunteers,even if used to meet a matching requirement; consultants or independent contractors not on the grantee's payroll; or employees of subrecipients or subcontractors in covered workplaces). City of Rancho Cucamonga Certifications-Page 6 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan—Draft May 1,2013 el r- ` 4 � :,. , E of rD ot o © O 1.]0__+1 r w 03 3 � O �'. = cc-,---2.\ _,. z m {it, va,-""" a ' - • M C nv v oo � IQ 0 C, _L � C al 0 0 o 3 3 CO m 3 i ii 4 111015) 1 D 1 1 1 n Clio M 0 i . D yam; `< cc to `< o CD 0 Q ' Cl SID ■ a _ 9 � � w L pa � L _L CD D • N iV a _. w w p o o O = N N O O a) a 01 1. 4 i i i i. E - vt:t• '1 n 1 an 7d wp Ti N i ›, CD 0 (7 CD Soo . QOM O. , CD -a r en 3 = CD � +. - i —I, = 3 0 3 c 7 a p o 0 0 w 3 r N I r 4 pg p O a 0 2 O yy C !a D 2 n _PC 394` nsf}z t.`3 S+�. , 1 • Z v S 'S°3E3R z 0 o r S S 53'38 w z 3 ? 1 • • • ' i .94, $ n I I -n I I D n ° nP . ` J � t fl 4 ' r /) O 1 CA? � � CD � � 1 (l J\ W m Q 0 D O a a � , r+ M roe Pa P .� cD cD _,,, ci. con) r D_ cr < i 5- = O CO cp Cep D -< SD Q \ IV O 0 _L. _ O — c w 4 1 _ N 0 0 1 i i 610) i V) fp ift 0 0 0 °o 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 o t., O O O O O O C) n o o O O O O O O }` o A., to O O O O O O /'� up o r \ J 1 tp nAN 7 w o 0 a cpooi‘DO. O.D 6f) 0 ...- (C) )-- CO b to ? o 8 4j9 ° j 2° ~ OS O co Od. o O �°° O 6' cp 06, ca ' CO O [D° �� OfA cri O O°O .C` °09 O cp [D W O 1 2 io to 09 0 ' .try °rO o o O ,cam >> o , to �0,� 0 iv O a .ma...-,,D V w co ° rn �� co 7� w 2 (A rn OrV N 1 1 I s 4--; (0 , I O 0 n 7d r D 0' CD < n CD r-•h 1 a L. i n O CD \tc o = cD a cr• CD 3 \ : -05© 0 0. = ,3 CAD O O II cr p -O CD F _.I 5 V f 1 0A �W i D 0n =9 K - co ' In , . < O o O o 5 ,--t ,--r � a 4 ea � a n �_ r+ CDC. 3 3 Q 3 , p .--� n = CD ,{ o �< w 3 0 CC5CT = CD 0 m� , O '- " cp = Q? N < w cD 0 CD 1 0 cDI -3 �' z 0 _ co'c- m ID o -' o � m m o D o v, m cnoa 0 '{ a cn v 0 0= < m ,. , {, r* o c= co G CD cD •Faill°4 • I � r 1 � _ 01 r- 00 C) 7d n___. * 0' = O o> ›, O rnz pa --- m r�-r P+ m >6 n . cp 0 cn (D- ,. -% -% 0 a : CD D Q � r (� V, o ., o ,D < 3 1- J) 0- CD CD i 7 I , MO. aM Chum41- i PA r• l.. 8 -. i -a lI +:s "o 8y 8z 1 alb •'s t"..* ° . _ c. 111.,„_.., .:,,,, i _ a ' ap` J ....- - ..._ .. 4. a'• V : g F :::!Iliqr , i`, w5 Fl. a 6 ®: es it „oft V- • ' Its. Ast r n a ! 3 3 (1) CD m 'g. Q o e j3 i3 3 < O Q Q di 1 z 0 = C g c (D m —�' CD I r v, x I W W 0 E D 1 .8 x - a a - s r . n 3 �2 2 n 1 Al —h 0 3 s \V Al 3 ?+I c 3 m a C o to 8 8 8 8 I s 5. CD �i—1— w 3 CI)o I v n `s a I O Al r+ s. § s s j , I r O g r. I e 0 a a I $ I a Cr v i 1'1 S ,a CD 5 g "s I o s 1 A g N 1 O f r O i X ,i tYn r l T " � D O � po � a 00 1; (-)z W CD ca k p- x, CD — _) < a o c' c o C� 0 < � + < m lj CD 9 CD c°0 CD m- n Q i 1 j t f J- ni D I I ' n n 7d . O t • • • • " -' ', "+�'+x r ¢: r .�CD CD • o C = Po = 3 ' PZ cn CD Q 0 � C-1 73 a CD ,--- CD O = < ,.i O CD CD CD 1 i O CD Ui n o — CD °o m °o I %I 0 N O n C3 N r+ 4. o 5. 3 <' = � m CD a = ai= CD j CD r+ w 0 CA a O = CO C) i -, -' C o o a 3 O' 0 r+ CD CD Crii a C Q I . . i jemole) • �� sue,,, I I n ;cc?, n -0 -0 04 j J o o o _ o� c I I 2 1. U) 0 G T El a (D < c n 5' * cc) CD CD w 5 n 3 3 m- m Q W • co '0 G Pa CD z cii U • n C Q CD r t P , n D * 0 Q 5. Q m - CI)o G co -n o ?! CD ° • o 5' m a (0 (Jr TI CD = Q ; O C Cal i O I � ' I y moo C ) CD • 5" 0 c • CD co w "0 Q O" x Zk n' ri .4t, ' i ■ rf O. s r ./- errealt) i !taw n 1 1 1 I I I -0 I " C) 7d U) CD u) _ n K_ -0 (D0000 t CT St W W z z 0 O n (D Cl) O O 4 0� -- Aa O� O� n. ci 3 E H u) f l 1 co n n (0 co o o 2. O > , n < M. 0 D 3 w cn 0 0 t D n co co • N 0 I zr, 1 k P355 STAFF REPORT - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jason C. Welday, Traffic Engineer<::)w Kirsten R. Bowman, Esq. Subject: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA RECOMMENDATION That the City Council: 1. Separately consider each of the following ten (10) Resolutions, which are Resolutions of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the Interstate 15 and Base Line Road Interchange Project in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana: Resolution No. 13-046 Resolution No. 13-047 Resolution No. 13-048 Resolution No. 13-049 Resolution No. 13-050 Resolution No. 13-051 Resolution No. 13-052 Resolution No. 13-053 Resolution No. 13-054 Resolution No. 13-055 2. Open and Conduct a hearing on the adoption of the proposed Resolutions of Necessity, receive from staff the evidence stated and referred to in this Agenda Report ("Report"), take testimony from any person wishing to be heard on issues A, B, C, and D below, and consider all evidence to determine whether to adopt each proposed Resolution of Necessity, each of which requires the City Council's separate consideration and determination. 3. If the City Council finds, based upon the evidence contained and referred to in this Report, the testimony and comments received at this hearing, and all written testimony submitted to the City Council, that the evidence warrants the necessary findings with respect to each of the proposed Resolutions of Necessity, then staff recommends that the City Council, in the exercise of its discretion, adopt the Proposed Resolutions of Necessity, Resolution Nos. 13-046, 13-047, 13- P356 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 2 048, 13-049, 13-050, 13-051, 13-052, 13-053, 13-054, 13-055 (each of which requires a 4/5ths vote of the entire Council) and authorize Richards, Watson & Gershon to commence eminent domain proceedings to acquire the following real property interests: • A permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement with a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7175 Green Glen Court and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-012-01 (the "Tamayo property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7201 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-50 (the "Bhatti property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7211 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-51 (the "Gamero property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7221 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-52 (the "SFR 2010 REO/Pierson property') for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7231 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-53 (the "Landino property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights, a permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for thirty-six (36) months from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13079 Falling Oak Drive and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-55 (the "Campos property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights and a permanent highway easement from the.real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13089 Falling Oak Drive and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-54 (the "Lopez property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • A permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 13539 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana, California, and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-01 (the "Tesoro property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Access Rights, a permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property P357 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 3 commonly known as 13449, 13451, and 13479 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana, California and identified as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 1100-771-02, -03, and - 09 (the "Pacific/Costanzo/ Lewis property") for streets, highways and related purposes; and • Abutter's Rights, a permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 7391 East Avenue in the City of Fontana and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-08 (the "Chado property')for streets, highways and related purposes. These real property interests are referred to below collectively as the "Subject Property Interests" and are described more particularly in the Exhibits attached to each Resolution of Necessity. Each Resolution also contains legal descriptions and plats depicting the Subject Property Interests. Said Resolutions together with their respective Exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated into this Report by this reference. 4. If the Resolutions of Necessity are approved, authorize Counsel for the City and City Staff to commence eminent domain proceedings and to take all necessary steps to deposit with the Court the amount of probable compensation required by law for issuance of Orders for Possession. 5. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Modifications to the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana are necessary in order to improve operational standards, to enhance public safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity for Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 mainline. The Interstate 15 and Base Line Road Interchange Project will meet these needs by widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and by adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue; by widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and by adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; by realigning and widening of the Southbound and Northbound Diamond ramps from one to two lanes; by adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and by adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The final design, Alternative 4, was selected from the four possible design alternatives, which included a no-build alternative, considered for the proposed Project because it meets the necessity of the proposed Project while at the same time causing the least private property injury to the property owners within the proposed Project limits. In order to accommodate construction of the needed improvements, it is necessary for the City to acquire additional right-of-way. The City has been authorized to acquire the necessary right-of-way for the proposed Project (including by means of eminent domain, if necessary) through cooperative agreements entered into by and between the City and Caltrans, and the City and the City of Fontana. As discussed in detail below, the proposed Project requires the acquisition of certain property interests from a total of twenty (20) property owners. The City has obtained possession of the necessary property interests from ten (10) of these property owners. Seven (7) of the remaining of the property owners within the City, and three (3) within the City of Fontana have not yet agreed to the purchase of the necessary property interests. All but one (1) of the remaining property interests to be acquired lie within existing landscape easements, sidewalk easements, or areas currently P358 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 4 maintained by the City. The acquisition of the remaining property interests will not impact existing private structures or require relocations of residents or businesses. The City has tendered written offers to all of the ten (10) property owners based on fair market value appraisals previously presented to and approved by the City Councils for the City and the City of Fontana. As part of the negotiations, City Staff requested that the remaining property owners execute rights of entry or possession and use agreements in order to grant the City possession for the purposes of right-of-way certification while still allowing City Staff and the property owners to negotiate the valuation of the property interests. However, because the City has been unable to come to an agreement for the purchase and sale of the property interests need for the proposed Project or the right of entry or possession and use of the property interests, it is now necessary to move forward with the Resolution of Necessity hearings to allow the City to meet certain funding deadlines and to maintain the proposed Project schedule. City Staff will continue to negotiate with the property owners. The City Council will be considering the adoption of Resolutions of Necessity for each of the properties identified in this Agenda Report. As further described below, the adoption of Resolutions of Necessity will allow the City to commence legal proceedings to acquire the necessary right-of- way for the proposed Project. It should be noted that the adoption of Resolutions of Necessity will not preclude City Staff from continuing to engage in amicable negotiations with the property owners. Further, all attempts will be made to acquire the property interests by purchase and sale agreement or by stipulated judgment rather than proceeding to eminent domain trials. In order to adopt each Resolution of Necessity, the City Council must find and determine with respect to each proposed acquisition that: A. The public interest and necessity require the proposed Project; B. The proposed Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The Subject Property Interests described in each Resolution of Necessity are necessary for the proposed Project; and D. The City has made an offer as required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to each of the owners of record of the real property it seeks to acquire. Based on the evidence outlined in the remainder of this report, staff recommends that upon closure of the public hearing, the City Council separately adopt the attached Resolutions of Necessity for each proposed acquisition. INTRODUCTION The City of Rancho Cucamonga proposes to construct streets and highways improvements to Base Line Road' at the Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. Because Interstate 15 is a part of the State Highway System, the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans") is providing planning, design and right-of-way oversight, as well as Base Line Road is referred to as Baseline Avenue in the City Fontana. They have been referred to collectively as Base Line Road for the purposes of the proposed Project and this Agenda Report. P359 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 5 operating as the lead agency for the purposes of California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") compliance. Further, because the Cities are seeking federal funding, under 23 U.S.C. 327, Caltrans is also operating as the lead agency as part of the environmental review process under the Federal National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA.") Base Line Road is a major east-west arterial in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. This facility carries high traffic volumes and is a primary thoroughfare linking the Cities with adjacent cities and the regional highway system. Base Line Road is bisected by Interstate 15, which is an eight-lane facility in the National Highway System. Interstate 15 travels from the Southwest to the Intermountain West and across the United States border to Canada. Interstate 15 was designated as a high priority corridor in 1995, and has seen significant improvement in major metropolitan areas due to exploding population and development growth. Base Line Road at the Interstate 15 Interchange is further bisected by East Avenue, a four-lane, north-south arterial that is signalized at Base Line Road and East Avenue. Base Line Road is currently a four-lane roadway within the proposed Project limits; however, because of recent and future planned housing, retail and commercial developments in the Cities, improvements to Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 Interchange are necessary to accommodate this population growth and the resulting increase in traffic demands. As further discussed in detail below, the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga's and Fontana's Circulation Elements of their respective General Plans specify that Base Line Road is intended to be a six to eight-lane major arterial or highway within the proposed Project limits, and is intended to provide efficient high volume traffic flow within their Cities and the region. The proposed Project will improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange from KIP 10.1 (PM 6.3) to KIP 11.4 (PM 7.1) in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana; therefore, the proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests are for a public purpose, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound Diamond Ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. Construction for the proposed Project is anticipated to commence at the end of 2013. BACKGROUND The City Council has before it ten (10) proposed Resolutions of Necessity for the acquisition of Abutter's Rights, permanent highway easements and/or temporary construction easements for terms of thirty-six (36) months located within the proposed Project limits of the Interstate 15 and Base Line Road Interchange Project in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. The proposed Project limits incorporate portions of Base Line Road and East Avenue in the City of P360 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 6 Rancho Cucamonga, portions of Baseline Avenue and East Avenue in the City of Fontana, and the Northbound and Southbound off-ramps and on-ramps of Interstate 15 within both City limits. In order to implement the proposed Project, it will be necessary to acquire certain right-of-way within the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. As mentioned above, Interstate 15 is within the National Highway System. Accordingly, Caltrans is responsible for the administration of any planning and design improvements to State Highway facilities, such as Interstate 15, as well as provide assistance in right-of-way acquisition. As part of its administrative duties Caltrans provides oversight through its Local Programs Unit located in District 8 in San Bernardino, California. On November 30, 2009, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Caltrans entered into a cooperative agreement under Streets and Highways Code Sections 114 and 130 for the purposes of constructing improvements to Interstate 15 and Base Line Road in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana ("Cooperative Agreement.") Pursuant to the terms of the Cooperative Agreement, Section: Scope: Right of Way (R/W), Paragraphs 51-56, the City of Rancho Cucamonga was delegated all right-of-way acquisition duties, which included the acquisition of real property needed for the proposed Project, by negotiation. However, under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement, the California Transportation Commission ("CTC") was delegated the authority to hear and adopt Resolutions of Necessity to acquire right-of-way for the proposed Project by eminent domain, if necessary. Because the City of Rancho Cucamonga agreed to operate as the lead agency for right-of-way acquisition duties in both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana, on December 5, 2012, the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Resolution authorizing the City of Rancho Cucamonga to enter into an agreement with the City of Fontana delegating all right-of- way acquisition duties associated with the proposed Project to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and, authorized the City of Rancho Cucamonga to hear and adopt Resolutions of Necessities, should such action be necessary. On February 26, 2013, the City of Fontana adopted a Resolution authorizing the City of Fontana to allow the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire right-of-way within the City of Fontana that was needed for the proposed Project, which included acquisition of right-of-way by eminent domain, if necessary. On or about February 26, 2013, the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana entered into a joint powers agreement ("Extra Territorial Agreement") under Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California and Sections 12 and California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.140 (a) and (b), which specifically authorized the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "City of Rancho Cucamonga" or "City" unless otherwise noted) to exercise its respective power of eminent domain to acquire the Subject Property Interests for the proposed Project on behalf of itself and the City of Fontana. On March 18, 2013, Caltrans gave the City its written authorization for the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to conduct hearings on the Resolutions of Necessity and to adopt the Resolutions of Necessity by a 4/5ths vote of the City Council. Caltrans' written authorization is dated March 18, 2013 and approved on March 29, 2013 by Brent L. Green, Chief, Caltrans Division of Right of Way and Land Surveys. The written authorization explains that "[u]sing the Rancho Cucamonga City Council to obtain Resolutions of Necessity will assist in meeting project delivery schedule and will also provide a convenient local hearing location for the property owners." P361 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 7 The Subject Property Interests the City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire for the proposed Project are sought for a public use, namely to improve the traffic circulation and safety at the Interstate 15 Interchange at Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and at Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana, and for all purposes necessary and convenient thereto in connection with the proposed Project pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19; California Government Code Sections 6500, 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010, et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including, but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.130, 1240.140 (a) and (b), 1240.250, 1240.350, 1240.410, 1240.420, 1240.510, 1240.530, 1240.610, 1240.640, 1240.650; Streets and Highways Code Sections 102, 114 and 130, and other provisions of the law. As discussed in detail below, the proposed Project is intended to alleviate existing and future traffic congestion at the Interstate 15 and Base Line Road off-ramps and on-ramps during peak morning and evening hours. It is intended to accommodate present and future projected increases in automobile and truck traffic due to rapid population growth and residential and commercial development in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. Finally, it is intended to alleviate unsatisfactory conditions associated with the existing Interchange configuration at the intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue where they bisect the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramps thereby causing insufficient storage space for left turning vehicles. The proposed Project requires the acquisition of property interests from twenty (20) properties in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. Fifteen (15) of the properties are within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and five (5) of the properties are within the City of Fontana. These acquisitions include Abutter's Rights,2 permanent highway easements and temporary construction easements for a term of thirty-six (36) months. The City of Rancho Cucamonga had previously acquired the following property interests for the purposes of the proposed Project: • Abutter's Rights, Base Line Road identified as Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22676, -1 and - 2; • Abutter's Rights, Base Line Road identified as Caltrans Parcel No. 22677-1; • Partial fee interest, Base Line Road identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-131-59 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22593-1; • Partial fee interest, Base Line Road and East Avenue identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-131-60 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22594-1. The City of Fontana had previously acquired the following Caltrans Parcels for the purposes of the proposed Project: • Abutter's Rights, permanent easement and temporary construction easement, Baseline Avenue, identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-901-43 and Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22599-1, -2, and -3; 2 Abutter's Rights include air, light and view,and abutter's access rights. P362 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 8 • Temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months, Baseline Avenue, identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-901-44 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22600-1. Pursuant to the terms of the Cooperative Agreement and the Extra-Territorial Agreement, the City of Fontana will convey the Caltrans' Parcels to the City, which in turn, will convey the Caltrans' Parcels that it acquired as part of the proposed Project, as well as the Caltrans' Parcels acquired by the City of Fontana, upon completion of the proposed Project. The City had acquired the following property interests identified as Caltrans' Parcels including their respective sub-Parcels through Tract Map approvals and/or by dedication from the developer property owners for the purposes of the proposed Project: • Abutter's Rights and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the property owned by LVD Rancho Cucamonga, LLC, identified as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 0227-693-56 through 59, and Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22598-1 and -2; • Abutter's Rights and permanent highway easement from the property owned by LVD Rancho Cucamonga, LLC and identified as Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22592-1 and -2; • Full fee acquisition from the property owned by KB Homes, identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-582-04 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22434-1. The City has entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with one property owner for the acquisition of the real property interests identified as follows: • Abutter's Rights from the property owned by Rozana and Juan Rivera, 7195 Acorn Place, identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-49, Caltrans Parcel No. 22678- 1. The City and the property owners of the remaining ten (10) parcels have not reached a negotiated purchase regarding the acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests. Based upon the timing of the proposed Project, it is necessary that the City Council for the City consider the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Necessity. As stated more fully below, the "Subject Property Interests" that are the subject of the Resolutions of Necessity are necessary for the proposed Project. The Subject Property Interests the City seeks to acquire for the proposed Project are described as follows: A permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7175 Green Glen Court, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-012-01 and Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22591-1 and -2 (the "Tamayo property") for streets, highways and related purposes. The legal description of the permanent highway easement the City seeks to acquire from San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-012-01 for streets, highways and related purposes is set forth in Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22591-1" to Resolution No. 13-053. The legal description of the temporary construction easement on San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-012-01 is set forth on Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22591-2" to Resolution No. 13-053; P363 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 9 The Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7201 Acorn Place, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-50 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22679-1 (the "Bhatti property') for streets, highways and related purposes. The legal description of the Abutter's Rights the City seeks to acquire from San Bernardino Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-50 for streets, highways and related purposes is set forth in Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22679-1" to Resolution No. 13-050; The Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7211 Acorn Place, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-51 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22680-1 (the "Gamero property') for streets, highways and related purposes. The legal description of the Abutter's Rights the City seeks to acquire from San Bernardino Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-51 for streets, highways and related purposes is set forth in Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22680-1" to Resolution No. 13-048; The Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7221 Acorn Place, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-52 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22681-1 (the "SFR 2010 REO/Pierson property") for streets, highways and related purposes. The legal description of the Abutter's Rights the City seeks to acquire from San Bernardino Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-52 for streets, highways and related purposes is set forth in Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22681-1" to Resolution No. 13- 054; The Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7231 Acorn Place, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-53 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22682-1 (the "Landino property') for streets, highways and related purposes. The legal description of the Abutter's Rights the City seeks to acquire from San Bernardino Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-53 for streets, highways and related purposes is set forth in Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22682-1" to Resolution No. 13-049; The Abutter's Rights, a permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13079 Falling Oak Drive, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-55 and Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22597-1, -2, and -3 (the "Campos property") for streets, highways and related purposes. The legal description of the Abutter's Rights the City seeks to acquire from San Bernardino Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-55 for streets, highways and related purposes is set forth in Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22597-2" to Resolution No. 13-046. The legal description of the permanent highway easement on San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-55 is set forth on Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22597-1" to Resolution No. 13-046. The legal description of the temporary construction easement on San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-55 is set forth on Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22597-3" to Resolution No.13-046; The Abutter's Rights and a permanent highway easement from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13089 Falling Oak Drive, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-54 and Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22596-1, and - 2 (the "Lopez property") for streets, highways and related purposes. The legal description of the permanent highway easement the City seeks to acquire from San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-54 for streets, highways and related purposes is set forth in Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22596-1" to Resolution No. 13-055. The legal description of the P364 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 10 Abutter's Rights on San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-54 is set forth on Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22596-2" to Resolution No. 13-055; A permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 13539 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana, California, and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771- 01 and Caltrans parcel Nos. 22601-1 and -2 (the 'Tesoro property') for streets, highways and related purposes. The legal description of the permanent highway easement the City seeks to acquire from San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-01 for streets, highways , and related purposes is set forth in Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22601-1" to Resolution No. 13- 047. The legal description of the temporary construction easement on San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-01 is set forth on Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22601-2" to Resolution No. 13-047; A permanent highway easement, Abutter's Access Rights and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 13449, 13451, and 13479 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana, California and identified as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 1100-771-02, -03, and -09 and Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22602-1, -2 and -3 (the "Pacific/Costanzo/ Lewis property') for streets, highways and related purposes. The legal description of the Abutter's Access Rights the City seeks to acquire from San Bernardino Assessor's Parcel Nos. 1100-771-02, -03, and -09 for streets, highways and related purposes is set forth in Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel Nos. 22602-2" to Resolution No. 13-051. The legal description of the permanent highway easement on San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Nos. 1100-771-02, -03, and -09 is set forth on Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22602-1" to Resolution No. 13-051. The legal description of the temporary construction easement on San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Nos. 1100-771-02, -03, and -09 is set forth on Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22602-3" to Resolution No. 13-051; and A permanent highway easement, Abutter's Rights and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 7391 East Avenue in the City of Fontana, identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-08 and Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22603-1, -2, and -3 (the "Chado property") for streets, highways and related purposes. The legal description of the Abutter's Rights the City seeks to acquire from San Bernardino Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-08 for streets, highways and related purposes is set forth in Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22603-2" to Resolution No. 13-052. The legal description of the permanent highway easement the City seeks to acquire from San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-08 for streets, highways and related purposes is set forth in Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22603-1" to Resolution No. 13-052. The legal description of the temporary construction easement on San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771- 08 is set forth on Exhibit "A" titled "Parcel No. 22603-3" to Resolution No. 13-052. The City extended offers pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 7262, et seq. to the property owners of record, but no negotiated sales have been reached. Based upon the timing of the proposed Project, it is necessary that the City Council consider at this time the adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests by eminent domain. In order to adopt each Resolution of Necessity with respect to the Subject Property Interests, the City Council must find and determine with respect to each proposed acquisition that: A. The public interest and necessity require the proposed Project; P365 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 11 B. The proposed Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The Subject Property Interests described in each Resolution of Necessity are necessary for the proposed Project; and D. The City has made an offer as required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to each of the owners of record of the real property it seeks to acquire. The amount of just compensation is not an issue before the City Council at this hearing. This hearing relates to issues A, B, C, and D above. DISCUSSION Background The City Council has before it proposed Resolutions of Necessity for the acquisition of portions of the Subject Property Interests as follows: • A permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7175 Green Glen Court, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-012-01 and as Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22591-1 and -2 (the "Tamayo property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7201 Acorn Place, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-50 and as Caltrans Parcel No. 22679-1 (the "Bhatti property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7211 Acorn Place, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-51 and as Caltrans Parcel No. 22680-1 (the "Gamero property")for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7221 Acorn Place, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-52 and as Caltrans Parcel No. 22681-1 (the "SFR 2010 REO/Pierson property")for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7231 Acorn Place, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-53 and as Caltrans Parcel No. 22682-1 (the "Landino property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights, a permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13079 Falling Oak Drive, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-55 and as P366 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 12 Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22597-1, -2, and -3 (the "Campos property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights and a permanent highway easement from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13089 Falling Oak Drive, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-54 and as Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22596-1 and -2 (the "Lopez property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • A permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 13539 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana, California, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-01 and as Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22601-1 and -2 (the "Tesoro property")for streets, highways; • A permanent highway easement, Abutter's Access Rights and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property and Abutter's Access Rights from the real property commonly known as 13449, 13451, and 13479 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana, California, identified as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 1100-771-02, -03, and -09 and as Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22602-1, -2, and -3 (the "Pacific/Costanzo/ Lewis property") for streets, highways and related purposes; and • A permanent highway easement, Abutter's Access Rights and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 7391 East Avenue in the City of Fontana, identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-08 and as Caltrans parcel Nos. 22603-1, -2, and -3 (the "Chado property")for streets, highways and related purposes. The proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests are for a public purpose, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound diamond ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The Subject Properties and the Subject Property Interests needed for the proposed Project are described as follows: P367 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 13 • The Tamayo property has a gross land area of 13,696 square feet and is rectangular in shape. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be impacted by the acquisition. Rather, the acquisition areas are encumbered by existing landscape and sidewalk easements in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Further, the Subject Property Interests are outside a perimeter wall in the rear yard of the Tamayo property. In order to construct the proposed Project, the City will need to acquire a 249 square foot permanent highway easement along the eastern boundary of the Tamayo property. The City will also need to acquire a 1,070 square foot temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months along the eastern boundary of the Tamayo property. The permanent highway easement and the temporary construction easement are rectangular in shape. • The Bhatti property has a gross land area of 9,221 square feet, and is rectangular in shape. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be physically impacted by the acquisition. In order to construct the proposed Project, the City will need to acquire the Abutter's Rights to Interstate 15, which include air, light and view and abutter's access rights along the eastern boundary of the Bhatti property. The abutter's rights are a legal interest. • The Gamero property has a gross land area of 9,004 square feet and is rectangular in shape. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be physically impacted by the acquisition. In order to construct the proposed Project, the City will need to acquire the Abutter's Rights to Interstate 15, which include air, light and view and abutter's access rights along the eastern boundary of the Gamero property. The abutter's rights are a legal interest. • The SFR210 REO/Pierson property has a gross land area of 8,474 square feet and is rectangular in shape. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be physically impacted by the proposed acquisition. In order to construct the proposed Project, the City will need to acquire the Abutter's Rights to Interstate 15, which include air, light and view and abutter's access rights along the eastern boundary of the SFR210 REO/Pierson property. The abutter's rights are a legal interest. • The Landino property has a gross land area of 11,477 square feet and is irregularly shaped. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be physically impacted by the acquisition. In order to construct the proposed Project, the City will need to acquire the Abutter's Rights to Interstate 15, which include air, light and view, and abutter's access rights along the eastern boundary of the Landino property. The abutter's rights are a legal interest. • The Lopez property has a gross land area of 14,496 square feet and is irregularly shaped. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be physically impacted by the acquisition. Further, the acquisition area is located outside the perimeter wall of the subdivision, and is being maintained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In order to construct the proposed Project, the City will need to acquire the Abutter's Rights to Interstate 15 and Base Line Road, which include air, light and view, and abutter's access rights along the southern (Base Line Road) and eastern (Interstate 15) boundaries of the Lopez property. The City will also need to acquire P368 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 14 an 880 square foot permanent highway easement along the Southern boundary of the Lopez property. The permanent highway easement is rectangular in shape. • The Campos property has a gross land area of 12,945 square feet and is irregularly shaped. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be physically impacted by the acquisition. Further, the acquisition area is located outside the perimeter wall of the subdivision and is being maintained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In order to construct the proposed Project, it will be necessary to acquire the Abutter's Rights to Base Line Road, which include air, light and view, and abutter's access rights along the southern line (Base Line Road) boundary of the Campos property. It will also be necessary to acquire a permanent highway easement of 43 square feet and a temporary construction easement of 1,075 square feet for a term of thirty-six (36) months along the southern boundary of the Campos property. The permanent highway easement is triangular in shape and the temporary construction easement is rectangular in shape. • The Pacific/Costanzo/Lewis property has a gross land area of 120,172 square feet and is irregularly shaped. It is improved with shopping center, which will not be physically impacted because the acquisition areas are located within an existing landscape easement in favor of the City of Fontana Community Facilities District. In order to construct the proposed Project, it will be necessary to acquire the remaining Abutter's Access Rights to Baseline Avenue. It will also be necessary to acquire a 5,165 square foot permanent highway easement and a 4,388 square foot temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months. The permanent highway easement and the temporary construction easement are rectangular in shape and run along the border of Baseline Avenue. • The Tesoro property, the larger parcel has a gross land area of 91,476 square feet and is irregularly shaped. It is improved with commercial enterprises including a gas station and a car wash. The improvements will not be physically impacted because the acquisition areas are located within an existing landscape easement in favor of the City of Fontana Community Facilities District. In order to construct the proposed Project, it will be necessary to acquire a 4,382 square foot permanent highway easement and a 4,136 square foot temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months. The permanent highway easement and the temporary construction easement are rectangular in shape and run along the border of Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana. • The Chado property is comprised of 206,036 square feet and is irregularly shaped. It is improved with several commercial enterprises including a roller skating rink. The only improvements that will be impacted by the proposed Project will be some landscaping within the acquisition areas. In order to construct the proposed Project, it will be necessary to acquire the remaining Abutter's Rights to Baseline Avenue, which include air, light, view and abutter's access rights. The Chado property does not have direct legal access to Baseline Avenue. Patrons must enter the Chado property from East Avenue. It will also be necessary to acquire a 381 square foot permanent highway easement and a 317 square foot temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months. The permanent highway easement and the temporary construction easement are rectangular in shape. P369 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity — Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 15 Base Line Road is currently a four-lane roadway within the proposed Project limits. Because of recent and future planned housing, retail and commercial developments in the cities, improvements to the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange are necessary to accommodate population growth and the resulting increase in traffic demands. The Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana's Circulation Elements of their respective General Plans specify that Base Line Road is intended to be a six to eight lane major highway or arterial within the proposed Project limits, and is intended to provide efficient high volume traffic flow within their Cities and the region. The proposed Project conforms to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Circulation Elements of its General Plan, General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require that Base Line Road be a six-lane Major Divided Highway within the proposed Project limits. Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently improved with four lanes within the proposed Project limits. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan specifies that six lanes within the proposed Project limits are sufficient to meet local and regional circulations needs for future growth. The proposed Project also conforms to the City of Fontana's Circulation Elements of its General Plan and West End Specific Plan, which identifies Baseline Avenue as a major east-west highway, which can accommodate six to eight lanes of travel and allowing for raised medians. Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is currently improved with six lanes from Citrus Avenue to Interstate 15. The City of Fontana's General Plan specifies that within the proposed Project limits, it is recommended that arterial segments that are located between freeway ramps and the next parallel facility, on either side of the freeway, such as Baseline Avenue at Interstate 15, be planned with an additional lane in each direction beyond its designated functional classification. These lanes will function as "auxiliary lanes" for more freeway access capacity and more efficient traffic flow between the ramps and the adjacent intersections and can serve as dedicated right turn lanes at the next intersection. THE PROJECT As part of the Project initiation process, the City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsored and funded the preparation of a Project Study Report — Project Development Support ("Project Study Report" or "PSR-PDS"), which was approved by Caltrans on April 28, 2002. A Project Study Report is an engineering document required by Caltrans, whose purpose is to analyze the purpose and need of a proposed Project and to document agreement on the scope, schedule and estimated costs of a proposed Project. It is intended to assure a consistent and uniform approach to the preparation of such a report, and it facilitates communication between local, regional and State agencies to ensure cooperation when developing a highway project. The Project Study Repot reviewed and analyzed the purpose and need of the proposed Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange Project within the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. It identified the following purpose and need for the proposed Project: Project Purpose The purpose of the proposed Project is to: • Alleviate existing and future traffic congestion at the Interstate 15/Base Line Road interchange ramps during peak hours to improve traffic through the Base Line Road interchange and the associated regional transportation system; • Accommodate the future projected increase in traffic due to rapid population and development growth in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana and the surrounding area; P370 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 16 • Correct the existing interchange operational deficiency associated with the existing interchange configuration at the intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue (currently East avenue bisects the existing Diamond interchange between the Interstate 15 Northbound and Southbound ramps); and • Increase the storage for left-turning vehicles at Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 ramps to accommodate traffic entering Northbound and Southbound Interstate 15 during peak morning and evening hours. Project Need • The Base Line Road/Interstate 15 interchange is experiencing significant traffic congestion and delays and the interchange is operating at levels of service "F" during the peak hours. • The Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana are experiencing rapid growth in population and residential and commercial developments; therefore, traffic congestion and delays at the interchange will continue to increase in the future. Therefore, it is anticipated that traffic congestion and delays at the interchange will continue to deteriorate over time. • A significant percentage of the existing traffic on Base Line Road and Interstate 15 consists of trucks. • The primary operational deficiency associated with the existing interchange configuration is the intersection of Base Line/East Avenue bisecting the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramps. Even with dual left-turn lanes from Base Line Road to both on-ramps, there is not sufficient storage capacity for left-turning vehicles during the peak hours. • To increase storage capacity for left-turning vehicles at Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 ramps to accommodate traffic entering Northbound and Southbound Interstate 15 during peak hours. • The current and anticipated growth in population and employment, were studied by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) through its population and employment growth projections and comprehensive Transportation Program (CTP) traffic model, to determine growth rates and forecasted traffic volumes. Further SCAG socioeconomic and traffic projections indicated that truck usage was increasing on Base Line Road and Interstate 15. Caltrans published truck data at the interchange indicates that approximately 22.5 percent of traffic is comprised of trucks. Proiect Initiation Phase and 2001 Traffic Operations Analysis As part of the Project Study Report and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Project Initiation Phase of the proposed Project, the City commissioned the preparation of a Traffic Operations Analysis. The Traffic Operations Analysis was reviewed and approved by Caltrans on June 25, 2001 ("TOA (2001)"). The TOA (2001) was prepared by LSA Associates on behalf of the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, the County of San Bernardino and Caltrans. The two primary purposes P371 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road(1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 17 of the TOA (2001) was to analyze existing traffic conditions at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange, and to analyze the relative effectiveness of two proposed project alternatives and the no-build alternative to accommodate forecasted year 2025 traffic. As further discussed below, Alternative 1 — No Build, Alternative 2 (partial Cloverleaf) and Alternative 3 (Cloverleaf) were the alternatives initially considered by the Project Study Report during the Project Initiation Phase of the proposed Project. Alternative 1-No Build The Alternative 1 — no-build alternative ("Alternative 1") showed that the existing level of service ("LOS") for the year 1999 and the future 2025 LOS for the intersections within the proposed Project limits, and the existing LOS for the year 1999 and the future 2025 LOS for the Interstate 15 mainline at the Base Line Road on-ramps and off-ramps during peak morning and evening hours ranged from LOS "D" to "F." Alternative 1 also showed that these Levels of Service would continue to deteriorate with significant increases in traffic congestion resulting in increased delays at the Interchange. At the time of the TOA (2001), traffic demand on Base Line Road, the Interstate 15 mainline and the Interstate 15 ramps were fast approaching capacity, and the Base Line Road intersections within the Southbound and Northbound ramps were operating at or near LOS "F," which was below the minimum concept LOS "D." Therefore, under Alternative 1, the LOS at the interchange would continue to deteriorate as the freeway mainline, ramps and arterial volumes increased through the forecasted year of 2025 traffic. The TOA (2001) also analyzed various types of accidents occurring at the Interstate 15 on-ramps and off-ramps, as well as along Base Line Road between Etiwanda Avenue and the Interstate 15 Northbound on-ramp for a forty-eight (48) month period starting on January 1, 1996 and ending on December 31, 1999. The TOA (2001) then utilized detailed Traffic Accident Surveillance and Analysis System ("TASAS") data it obtained from Caltrans, and traffic accident information from the City of Rancho Cucamonga to analyze the type of accidents, the accident rates and the accident locations. The type of accidents most prevalent along the Interstate 15 mainline were rear end and hit-object collisions, which each accounted for approximately 33% of the total accidents. It was noted in the report that rear end collisions were most common at freeway merge locations and weaving areas similar to that at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange. The majority of accidents at the Interstate 15 ramps and along Base Line Road were broadside collisions. Further, according to the TOA (2001), broadside collisions were common at congested intersections where heavy left turning volumes conflicted with heavy through traffic volumes. The detailed TASAS data further revealed that the primary locations of high accident concentrations "hot spots" were at the ramp intersections with Base Line Road and Interstate 15. Approximately 58% of these accident hot spots were on Base Line Road near the ramp intersections, and approximately 30% of the accident hot spots occurred where vehicles were exiting the off-ramps onto Base Line Road. The TOA (2001) utilized the LOS data and accident data gathered along with projections to evaluate the two other alternatives: Alternative 2 (Partial Cloverleaf) and Alternative 3 (Cloverleaf.) According to the Project Study Report, Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 sought to construct various ramp improvements, which included removal and replacement of existing Northbound and Southbound on-ramps and off-ramps. The proposed alternatives offered the same improvements to Base Line Road and on the Interstate 15 mainline, with different configurations. P372 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 18 Alternative 2-Partial Clover leaf The proposed Alternative 2 resulted in a LOS "B" during the morning peak hours at the Interstate 15 ramp intersections on Base Line Road, and a LOS "F" during morning peak hours at the Base Line Road and East Avenue intersection, and a LOS "D" during the evening peak hours at the Base Line Road and East Avenue intersection. In order to address the lower level of service, the Project Study Report determined that it necessitated the construction of an additional Eastbound and/or Westbound through lane on Base Line Road at the East Avenue intersection. According to the Project Study Report, these additional lanes would have required the reconstruction of the freeway bridge structures, which would have added approximately $7 million to $10 million in construction costs to the proposed Project, and the required construction and staging of the bridge structures would have created severe adverse impacts on the community and traveling public. Further, as Alternative 2 was being analyzed, it became apparent that it would be necessary to construct the partial cloverleaf within the Southeast quadrant of the Interchange within the proposed Project limits. As further discussed below, the Southeast quadrant was developed with approximately fourteen (14) businesses, which would have to be relocated in order to construct the partial cloverleaf. Accordingly, not only would commercial property need to be acquired but fourteen (14) businesses would need to be relocated under Alternative 2. After much consideration, the Project Development Team (PDT) determined that it was necessary to eliminate the partial cloverleaf from the designs and that incorporating additional through lanes on Base Line Road were not viable components of Alternative 2. Alternative 3-Cloverleaf The proposed Alternative 3 proposed the construction of two cloverleafs, one in the Northeast quadrant of the Interchange and the other in the Southeast quadrant of the Interchange. According to the Project Study Report, there was ongoing residential and commercial development in the Northeast quadrant of the Interchange, and as discussed above, there were commercial properties and approximately fourteen (14) businesses in the Southeast quadrant of the Interchange. In addition, there were operational deficiencies associated with the East Avenue/Southbound off-ramp intersection under Alternative 3. Therefore, the PDT unanimously decided that Alternative 3 was not a viable option. In their analysis, the PDT determined that Alternative 3 was not an acceptable solution because the East Avenue/Southbound off-ramp intersection will continue to operate at a LOS "F in the morning peak hours. Further, Alternative 3 would require the acquisition of right-of-way within the Northeast quadrant of the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange, which would result in impacts to current and future residential development. Finally, the PDT considered the potential safety and operational concerns created by the triple-left turn from the off-ramp opposing the eastbound approach of Chateau Drive to conclude that Alternative 3 was not a viable option and accordingly, the PDT removed it from further consideration. Consideration of Other Alternatives The PDT continued to analyze different alternatives for the proposed Project. Although Alternative 2 remained a possible alternative, the PDT recognized that in order to implement Alternative 2, it would be necessary to acquire and relocate approximately fourteen (14) businesses operating in the Southeast quadrant of the proposed Project limits or to construct additional through lanes. Both options would have increased the costs for the proposed Project astronomically, and would have had major impacts on the private businesses in the Southeast quadrant of the Interchange. P373 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 19 In January 2006, a Value Analysis Report (VAR) was commissioned by Caltrans and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The VAR was intended to focus on the proposed alternatives and to identify design modifications that would increase capacity, improve operations, maintain or improve safety, reduce costs if possible, and satisfy the local stakeholders. The VAR investigated matters such as design alternatives and project descriptions and provided recommendations for design modifications that would have the least public and private impacts. After conducting the necessary research and review of the proposed alternatives, the VAR concluded that 1) the Park 'n Ride facility in the City of Rancho Cucamonga should be eliminated, and the Southbound on-ramp realigned slightly to the west through the Park 'n Ride facility and construct a 40 meter radius on-ramp curve for the right turns from Base Line Road, which would reduce the amount of right-of-way needed for the proposed Project and 2) install dual left turn lanes from Base Line Road. The VAR further concluded that when, sometime in the future, the capacity of the dual left lanes is exceeded, Caltrans and the City of Rancho Cucamonga could then construct a two lane Eastbound flyover to Northbound Interstate 15 with access from Eastbound Base Line Road. Based upon a continued review of the alternatives and the recommendations in the VAR, the PDT developed Alternative 4 (preferred alternative), which eliminated the need for the acquisition of the private property and the fourteen (14) businesses in the Southeast quadrant of the proposed Project limits while still obtaining the level of services goals of Alternative 2. Alternative 4 (preferred alternative and the proposed Project) Alternative 4, the preferred alternative, was developed to eliminate the need for acquisition of the right-of-way and relocation impacts to the properties in the Southeast quadrant of the interchange as discussed above. Its improvements match those of Alternative 2, except for the following modifications: Base Line Road would be widened slightly more on the southerly side; • The Northbound Loop entrance ramp would be replaced by an Eastbound dual left turn lanes to the Northbound Interstate 15 freeway; The Diamond entrance ramp would be widened to receive dual left turns from Eastbound Base Line Road left lanes; • The Northbound exit ramp that utilizes existing East Avenue undercrossing bridge would need to be widened to accommodate the two lane exit; and • Two new bridges and one widened bridge would be required to be constructed. Because Caltrans' guidelines for freeway operations analysis require that existing year traffic counts are not more than three (3) years old, the 1999 traffic counts utilized in the TOA (2001) had to be updated. Thereafter, in October 2006, LSA prepared a second Traffic Operations Analysis TOA (2006) to re-assess Alternative 1, Alternative 2 and Alternative 4, and their impacts on traffic conditions and safety at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange. The analyses again examined traffic volumes and levels of service based on the freeway mainline and ramp influence areas in the proposed Project limits. The base-year conclusions for the traffic model were taken from 2005 data. P374 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 20 In addition to Alternative 1 — no-build alternative, LSA re-examined Alternatives 2 and 4. As discussed above, the PDT determined at the time of the Project Study Report that Alternative 3 was no longer a viable alternative. After the Project Study Report had been completed, the PDT also modified Alternative 2 to remove the free right-turn on the northbound off-ramp. Based upon further research and the conclusions of the VAR, Alternative 4, which is a modified version of Alternative 2, was developed for consideration, to address the issue of available right-of- way on the East side of the interchange. Because significant costs would be associated with acquisition of the right-of-way required for the partial Cloverleaf design, an eastbound dual left-turn alternative was developed. The TOA (2006) examined the morning and evening traffic data under the existing no-build conditions, the opening year (2010) — no-build and build conditions and the design year (2030) — no-build and build conditions. According to the TOA (2006), the existing freeway levels of service ranged from LOS "A" to LOS "C" during the morning and evening peak hours. The existing intersection levels of service were similar with the exception of the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 intersection, which operated at LOS "F" during peak morning hours and LOS "E" during evening peak hours. As expected, the projected levels of service for Alternative 1 in 2010 and in 2030 declined significantly, such that the majority of the LOS for the morning and evening peak hours in 2030 would be a LOS "F." On the other hand, the levels of service for Alternatives 2 and 4, were much higher in 2010 with a gradual reduction in the levels of service from the 2010 levels to 2030. The TOA (2006) was approved in November 2006 for a scheduled opening year of 2010, with a corresponding design horizon year of 2030. The traffic volume data for 2030 was based on forecasts from SCAG's Destination 2030. The scheduled opening year of the proposed Project was subsequently changed to 2012, which under Caltrans' guidelines, typically would require a twenty year design period out to 2035. Through further research and study, the differences between design year 2030 and 2035 were evaluated in a Supplement to Traffic Operations Analysis prepared in September 2008 ("STOA (2008).") In addition, a focused analysis was conducted in a Supplemental Traffic Operations Analysis in June 2009, which concluded that under design year 2035 with project conditions, all study intersections were projected to operate at satisfactory levels of service. The updated 2035 forecasted traffic volumes on the freeway ramps were found to be comparable to or slightly higher than the previously forecasted 2030 volumes. Therefore, although the design alternatives were based on 2030 forecasted traffic volumes, based on the results of the STOA (2008), the proposed Project was determined to accommodate projected 2035 traffic levels, therefore, the previously forecasted 2030 volumes were sufficient to satisfy Caltrans' guidelines. Again the projected levels of service for the existing no-build (2009) conditions, the no-build (2012) conditions and the no-build (2030) conditions were consistent with the previous Traffic Operations Studies in 2001 and 2006, wherein there were significant declines in levels of service over time. With regard to Alternatives 2 and 4, the levels of service for 2012 and 2030 were consistent with those levels projected in the TOA (2006) for those same alternatives. Therefore, at a minimum, the Traffic Operative Studies had accurately projected traffic levels for 2005 and 2010 build years. Alternative 4 was selected as the preferred alternative for the proposed Project. P375 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 21 Description of Project The proposed acquisitions of real property are for public purposes, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange from KP 10.1 (PM 6.3) to KP 11.4 (PM 7.1) in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound Diamond Ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The primary operational deficiency associated with the existing interchange is caused by the interchange's geometric constraints and inadequate capacity. The intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue bisecting the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramp intersections results in a large queue of vehicles on Base Line Road. Due to short separations between the three intersections and delays caused by many signal phases, especially for left turn movements to the Interstate 15 ramps for Westbound traffic in the morning peak hours and Eastbound traffic in the evening peak hours, there is heavy queuing on Base Line Road. The queuing on Base Line Road during these peak hours, results in heavy queuing on the exit ramps, which includes heavy queuing for the Northbound exit ramp in the evening peak hours and for the Southbound exit ramp in the morning peak hours. The queuing at the exit ramps during the peak hours also leads to traffic backing up on the Interstate 15 mainline. The two ramp intersections are currently operating at LOS "C" and the Base Line Road at East Avenue is currently operating at LOS "F" to "D" during the peak morning and evening hours, respectively. Without the interchange improvements, all three intersections are expected to operate at LOS "F" by the horizon year of 2030. The proposed Project will alleviate congestion on Base Line Road and ensure that the interchange will operate at an acceptable level of service to accommodate projected growth in the surrounding region in the future. Further, the proposed Project will alleviate the projected increase in truck traffic, which will only add to heavy traffic congestion. The proposed Project is consistent with the circulation elements of the General Plans of the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. The Cities recognize that local circulation within their respective Cities is linked with the regional system; therefore, highlighting the need for continued participation in regional programs. The proposed Project is identified as circulation improvements within each of the General Plans, and the proposed Project is required for the public health and safety because it would relieve traffic congestion, improve traffic circulation, and reduce noise levels in these areas of the community. The proposed Project requires the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests, which are located within the area of the proposed improvements. The Subject Property Interests are long and P376 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity — Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 22 rectangular in shape. They border the real properties and Base Line Road or East Avenue, and do not include the removal of any walls, buildings or homes. With respect to the Gamero, Bhatti, REO 2010/Pierson and Landino properties, the City is acquiring the Abutter's Rights to Interstate 15. With regard to the Lopez property, the City is acquiring a permanent highway easement along with the Abutter's Rights to Base Line Road, and with regard to the Campos property, the City is acquiring a permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement along with the Abutter's rights to Base Line Road and Interstate 15. These interests are outside of the subdivision's perimeter walls and have been maintained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. With regard to the Tamayo property, the City is seeking to acquire a permanent highway easement and temporary construction easement, which are already encumbered by landscape and sidewalk easements in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. With regard to the Chado property, the City is seeking to acquire a small permanent highway easement, a temporary construction easement and the remaining Abutter's Rights on Base Line Road. Finally, with regard to the Tesoro and Pacific/Costanzo/Lewis properties, the City is seeking to acquire a permanent highway easement, a temporary construction easement, and Abutter's Access Rights (Pacific/Costanzo/Lewis only), which are already encumbered by a landscape easement in favor of the City of Fontana Community Facilities District. The legal descriptions for the proposed acquisitions are set forth in the Exhibits to the Resolutions of Necessity. Therefore, as stated above there will be no impacts to any walls, buildings or homes as part of the Subject Property Interests needed for the proposed Project. Regional Impacts The proposed Project is consistent with regional forecasts and goals. In December 2005, San Bernardino Associated Governments ("SANBAG") completed a Final Comprehensive Corridor Study (December 2005) ("CCS") for the Interstate 15 mainline from State Route 60 near the City of Ontario to the Mojave River in the City of Victorville. The CCS addressed forecasted operational deficiencies on the freeway mainline. The CCS identified a range of potential alternative solutions to meet current and future traffic demands on this 45 mile section of the Interstate 15. According to the Project Study Report, the proposed alternatives are consistent with the CCS and its forecasted operational needs and solutions. It was found through the STOA (2008) and the 2009 Supplemental Traffic Operations Analysis that traffic congestion within the proposed Project limits will worsen over time unless operational and capacity improvements are made. The proposed Project would improve the operation of the interchange ramps at Base Line Road, and would not preclude implementation of improvements to the Interstate 15 ultimate corridor in accordance with Caltrans Route Concept Fact Sheet dated March 1999 and the CCS completed by SANBAG in December 2005. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Introduction As a proposed discretionary action by a local agency, the proposed Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. ("CEQA.") Further, because the proposed Project will be partially funded by the Federal Government, it is subject to the National Environmental Policy Act NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c) ("NEPA.") Accordingly, the proposed Project is subject to both federal and state environmental review as further discussed below. P377 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 23 As discussed above, Caltrans is the designated lead agency under the current Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") and Caltrans' stewardship program. Therefore, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 327, Caltrans is tasked with providing full over-sight on the planning, design and right-of-way for the proposed Project, and tasked with preparing and reviewing the applicable environmental documents. As the lead agency for the proposed Project, Caltrans commissioned the preparation of an Initial Study along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") as required under CEQA, and an Environmental Assessment along with Finding of No Significant Impacts ("EA/FONSI") as required under NEPA. Caltrans studied and analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project to identify potentially significant impacts and to identify more feasible alternatives for the proposed Project that may accomplish the basic project objectives while lessening or eliminating any potentially significant project impacts to the environment. Upon completion of the IS/MND and EA/FONSI they were distributed to the federal, State, regional and local agencies, and certain elected officials, as well as property owners and utilities whose property that may be partially or fully acquired as part of the proposed Project. In addition, all property owners and occupants within a 100 (sic) foot radius of the proposed Project limits were provided with a copy of the Notice of Availability published in conjunction with the public circulation of the IS/MND and EA/FONS for the proposed Project. CEQA and NEPA Compliance Pursuant to the requirements under CEQA and NEPA, checklists were utilized in order to identify physical, biological, social and economic factors that might be affected by the proposed Project. In many cases, background studies performed in connection with the proposed Project indicated no impacts under CEQA and NEPA. The following factors were identified as having less than significant. impact and were studied further for the purposes of the proposed Project: Visual/Aesthetics Review, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, Air Quality, NPDES/Water Quality and Noise. These factors are briefly discussed below. Visual/Aesthetics Review For visual and aesthetics review, compliance with CEQA requires, at a minimum, that a Scenic Resource Evaluation be conducted. Under NEPA, a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) is required to assess visual impacts of the proposed Project. The VIA that was prepared as part of the proposed Project was intended to satisfy the requirements of both CEQA and NEPA. A VIA dated February 2011, was prepared to assess the potential visual impacts and to analyze any potential changes of views of or from Interstate 15 and Base Line Road. In preparing the VIA, it was necessary to take into consideration the vividness of the view, the intactness of the view and the unity of the view. The study evaluated the surrounding area, which included the residential properties, the existing vegetation and the proposed alternatives for the proposed Project. After performing an extensive study and review, the VIA discussed the impacts of the proposed alternatives and made recommendations that the following measures be implemented in order to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse visual impacts: • No scenic vistas are within the proposed Project limits; therefore, there was no impact to scenic vistas; P378 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 24 • Base Line Road is not in the State Highway System; therefore, there are no impacts to the scenic highways and resources of a State Highway; • Visual Impacts would result from the presence of construction equipment and activities; however, these activities will be for a short period of time. Therefore, they are considered less than significant impacts. • Removal of trees on the west side of Interstate 15 will be mitigated because of the implementation of landscape improvements and the replacement of trees as part of the proposed Project. • Visual Impacts resulting from night time construction resulting in night time glare. The proposed Project would include measures to prevent night time glare and any new lighting. The recommendations in the VIA have been considered as part of the design and construction of the proposed Project. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials As part of the Project Study Report and the Project Initiation Phase, the City prepared an Initial Site Assessment (ISA) dated March 2007 along with a Supplemental Initial Site Assessment dated March 2011 (SISA.) According to both assessments, the proposed Project had the potential for hazardous waste; therefore, multiple testing was performed to determine the nature and extent of the potential for hazardous waste within the proposed Project limits. On June 16, 2006, an Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) Report was prepared by an independent testing facility, and was reviewed and approved by Caltrans on March 11, 2007. Based on the results of the ADL report, the soils in the proposed Project limits were classified as non-hazardous with respect to lead, and were determined to be usable on the proposed Project site with compliance with a Project-Specific Lead Compliance Plan. In addition, a Draft Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment ("Hazardous Waste ISA") dated May 2007 was also prepared and approved on August 7, 2007. According to the Hazardous Waste ISA, the proposed Project area contained yellow traffic striping and pavement markings, which required testing and removal in accordance with Caltrans Standard Special Provision XE 15-300. Further, pole and pad mounted electrical transformers were identified within the proposed Project limits, and were considered potential locations for PCB (polychlorinated bi-phenyl) hazard if they were leaking. In addition, asbestos containing materials (ACMs), lead-based paints (LBPs), and PCBs were identified as possible issues during construction because of the bridge structures that were to be demolished as part of the proposed Project. On December 22, 2010, a Hazardous Building Materials Survey (HBMS) was performed at two locations within the proposed Project limits. Based on the HBMS, ACMs were found at certain locations of the bridge structures; however, LBP concentrations of lead greater than 0.5 percent by weight were not detected in the paint chips. Because ACMs were identified in the two bridge structures, it was recommended that prior to renovation or demolition work, a licensed asbestos abatement removal contractor should remove the ACMs, and that all applicable laws and regulations should be followed, including notices to regulatory agencies, and workers in the presence of asbestos. P379 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 25 As part of the Project Study Report, it was recommended that the handling of the ACMs be dictated by the contractor in accordance with Special Provisions prepared during the Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) phase of the proposed Project. Finally, based upon a recommendation by the SISA, a permitted former agricultural site located within the proposed Project limits was determined to potentially contain concentrations of herbicides, pesticides, and metals associated with the applications of herbicides and pesticides, due to its permitted use as a nursery. A Limited Site Investigation was conducted, and according to a report generated as part of the Limited Site Investigation, there were no recommendations for further investigations of this former agricultural site. Air Quality An Air Quality Analysis, dated February 2011, was prepared to review potential air quality issues associated with the proposed Project. According to the Analysis the proposed Project would not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. Further, although the proposed Project is located in a nonattainment area for federal and State ozone, the proposed Project would not result in an exceedances of the one-hour and eight-hour CO standards, and the proposed Project would not contribute to a PM10 hot spot that will cause or contribute to violations of the federal PM2.5 standards. Based on these findings, no mitigation was needed. The Air Quality Analysis also addressed the potential for increases in pollutant concentrations specifically associated with fugitive dust and construction equipment emissions during construction. However, implementation of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) rules and regulations, as well as Caltrans Department Standard Conditions and additional measures identified in the environmental document indicated that no mitigation was required to address these potential issues. NPDES/Water Quality A storm water data report was prepared and approved by Caltrans on June 1, 2011 for the PANED phase of the proposed Project. It was anticipated that as long as Best Management Practices (BMPs) and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) were implemented during construction and operation of the proposed Project, further mitigation was not necessary. Finally, as long as the proposed Project complied with Caltrans Storm Water Management Plan and NPDES permitting requirements, no mitigation for surface water runoff or storm water runoff was necessary. Noise A Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) was prepared and approved on both March 4, 2011 and March 8, 2011. The NADR was intended to present a Preliminary Noise Abatement Decision as defined by the Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol on noise generated during construction, and after construction has been completed on the proposed Project. As part of the NADR, sensitive receptors would have been exposed to construction noise during anticipated construction of the proposed Project. The closest sensitive receivers were within 50 feet of the construction and may be subject to short term noise levels of 95 A-weighted decibels (dBA) maximum instantaneous noise level (Lmax) or higher generated by construction activities. Compliance with the Department's Standard Specifications and other measures, would minimize construction noise; therefore, the construction noise was considered to be less than significant. Many of the residences within the proposed Project limits were and would continue to be exposed to traffic noise approaching or exceeding Caltrans noise abatement criteria, as well as the noise P380 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 26 standards identified in the Cities' General Plans. The Cities' General Plan Noise Elements noise standards are based on interior and exterior noise limits for residential properties. Although the Cities have not adopted noise standards, the General Plans references the State interior and exterior noise limits for residential uses. For the City of Rancho Cucamonga, those levels are 60 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) and 45 dBA CNEL, respectively. The City of Fontana's interior and exterior noise standards are 65 dBA CNEL, and 45 dBA CNEL. Although the Cities' noise standards are expressed in CNEL and the traffic noise model utilized by Caltrans expresses continuous noise of a specified period of time (Leq), the CNEL and Leq were considered equivalent for the purposes of the analysis. Based upon the above Analysis, when compared with Alternative 1, the noise levels of Alternatives 2 and 4 would be expected to increase by no more than 3dBA. Therefore, according to the Analysis, this increase in noise would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, sound barriers were not recommended for Alternative 4. However, Caltrans requested, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga committed to the construction of a sound barrier (SB No. 4) at a height of approximately 14 feet adjacent to the off-ramp in the Northwest quadrant of the Interchange within the proposed Project limits. The purpose of which was to address potential noise impacts to the residences in the adjacent subdivision associated with the location of the off-ramp. Additional NEPA Requirements In addition to the above matters, NEPA also required consideration of Title VI, Independent Utility/Logical Termini and Environmental Justice. Title VI: According to the EA/FONSI, all considerations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes had been included in the proposed Project. The only consideration required to be addressed was the installation of curb ramps and concrete sidewalks conforming to ADA standards at all intersections where pedestrian movement is allowed. This consideration was to accommodate low mobility groups utilizing the sidewalks within the proposed Project limits. These recommendations have been incorporated into the proposed Project plans. Independent Utility/Lopical Termini: Federal regulations (23CFR 771.111(f)) require that "independent utility" and "logical termini" be established for any transportation improvement project evaluated under NEPA. In accordance with the specific criteria listed in the Federal regulations, it was concluded in the EA/FONSI that the proposed Project satisfied these criteria as follows: • The six lanes on Base Line Road within the proposed Project limits transition back to four lanes at locations east and west of the Interchange, which connect logical termini and are of sufficient length to address environmental matters on a broad scope. • The proposed Project has independent utility because it is intended to improve traffic conditions at the interchange and the ramps connecting Interstate 15 to Base Line Road, and it will benefit the traveling public even if no additional improvements are made to either Base Line Road or Interstate 15. • The proposed Project will not restrict the implementation of other reasonably foreseeable transportation improvements. P381 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 27 Environmental Justice All projects involving federal action must comply with Executive Order (EO) 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations. This Executive Order directs federal agencies to take the appropriate and necessary steps to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse effects of federal projects on the health or environment of minority and low- income populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. A Community Impact Statement was prepared on August 2007, and was based upon census data from the United States Census (2000). Based on the discussion and analysis in the Community Impact Statement, it was concluded that Alternative 4, the preferred alternative, would not cause disproportionately high adverse effects on any minority or low-income populations as per Executive Order(EO) 12898 regarding environmental justice. Mitigation Requirements under CEQA and NEPA As part of the CEQA and NEPA checklists, the proposed Project would have no significantly adverse effect on natural communities or wetlands or other waters within the proposed Project limits, because the following mitigation measures were required to reduce the potential effects to insignificance: • Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board; • Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game; • United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 14; and • Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination. The Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination letter was issued by FHWA (Federal Highway Commission) on June 15, 2011. With regard to the remaining mitigation measures, there was the option of either purchasing mitigation credits from an off-site mitigation bank or participation in an in-lieu fee program; however, final determination would be made by the applicable resource agency. Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Finding of No Sipnifcant Impacts The Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Finding of No Significant Impacts along with the mitigation requirements identified above, were approved on September 30, 2011. The notices of the approvals were published in the appropriate publications, and disseminated to the appropriate agencies and parties on September 30, 2011. There have been no challenges to the CEQA and NEPA studies and reports; therefore, any such challenges have been waived. CITY'S ACTIONS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 7267.2. ET SEQ. As more fully described below, the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, prior to the Cities adopting the resolutions and entering into the Extra-Territorial Agreement as described above, pursuant to California Gov. Code Section 7267.2, et seq., obtained fair market value appraisals of the Subject Property Interests, set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market values, and extended written offers in accordance with Gov. Code Section 7267.2, et seq., to the P382 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 28 owners of record. The following is a brief summary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's actions pursuant to Gov. Code Section 7262, et seq., in connection with each of the Subject Property Interests. (1) The real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7175 Green Glen Court, identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-012-01 and as Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22591-1 and -2 (the "Tamayo property") Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 7262, et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the subject real property that used a February 14, 2013 date of value. The City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value on February 20, 2013 and extended a written offer on February 26, 2013 to the owner of record, James Tamayo. On April 10, 2013, the City sent a letter indicating that the City sought to acquire a permanent highway easement in lieu of a fee interest, and there were no other changes in the offer being tendered. On April 10, 2013, the City sent a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity. The City and record property owner have not reached an agreement regarding the purchase of the Subject Property Interests. However, negotiations are ongoing. (2) The real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga , California, commonly known as 7201 Acorn Place, identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-50 and as Caltrans Parcel No. 22679-1, (the "Bhatti property") Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 7262, et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the subject real property that used a February September 14, 2012 date of value. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value on December 5, 2012, and extended a written offer on January 22, 2013 to the owners of record Satinderjit and Simrit Bhatti. The property owners counter offered and City Staff, in turn, suggested that the property owners obtain an appraisal of the property interests to be acquired. The property owners indicated in recent correspondence that they did not wish to obtain an appraisal. On April 10, 2013, the City sent a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity. The City and record property owners have not reached an agreement regarding the purchase of the Subject Property Interests. However, negotiations are ongoing. (3) The real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga , California, commonly known as 7211 Acorn Place, identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-51 and as Caltrans Parcel No. 22680-1, (the "Gamero property") Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 7262, et seq., the City obtained a fair market value appraisal of the subject real property that used a September 14, 2012 date of value. The City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value on December 5, 2012, and extended a written offer on January 15, 2013 to the owners of record Jose and Debra Gamero. The property owners counter offered and City Staff, in turn, suggested that the property owners obtain an appraisal of the property interests to be acquired. The property owners obtained an appraisal, which confirmed the fair market value conclusions of the City's appraisers. On April 10, 2013, the City sent a Notice of Intent to Adopt a P383 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 29 Resolution of Necessity. The City and record property owner have not reached an agreement regarding the purchase of the Subject Property Interests. However, negotiations are ongoing. (4) The real property located at 7221 Acorn Place, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-52 and as Caltrans Parcel No. 22681-1 (the "SFR 210 REO/Pierson property") Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 7262, et seq., the City obtained a fair market value appraisal of the subject real property that used a September 14, 2012 date of value. The City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value on December 5, 2012, and extended a written offer on January 16, 2013 to the owners of record REO 2010 SFR. On or about March 25, 2013, the negotiating parties were informed by Housing and Urban Development Authority ("HUD") that the property was sold to Dinah Pierson. The new owner was confirmed through a title check and on April 1, 2013, the City sent Ms. Pierson a written offer. On April 10, 2013, the City sent a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity. The City and record property owner have not reached an agreement regarding the purchase of the Subject Property Interests. However, negotiations are ongoing. (5) The real property located at 7231 Acorn Place in the City of Rancho Cucamonga identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-53 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22682-1 (the "Landino property") Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 7262, et seq., the City obtained a fair market value appraisal of the subject real property that used a September 14, 2012 date of value. The City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value ton December 5, 2012, and extended a written offer on January 23, 2013 to the owner of record Carlos Landino. The negotiating parties met with Mr. Landino. On April 10, 2013, the City sent a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity. The City and record property owner have not reached an agreement regarding the purchase of the Subject Property Interests. However, negotiations are ongoing. (6) The real property located at 13079 Falling Oak Drive in the City of Rancho Cucamonga identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-55 and as Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22597-1, -2, and -3 (the "Campos property") Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 7262, et seq., the City obtained a fair market value appraisal of the subject real property that used a February 14, 2013 date of value. The City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value on February 20, 2013, and extended a written offer on February 26, 2013 to the owners of record Victor Campos and Rosenda Perez. The negotiating parties spoke to Mr. Campos on multiple occasions. He indicated that he was not sure whether he would obtain his own appraisal. On April 10, 2013, the City sent a letter advising the property owners that the City sought to acquire a permanent highway easement in lieu of a fee interest, and there were no other changes in the offer being tendered. On April 10, 2013, the City sent a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity. The City and record property owner have not reached an agreement regarding the purchase of the Subject Property Interests. However, negotiations are ongoing. P384 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity- Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 30 (7) The real property located at 13089 Falling Oak Drive in the City of Rancho Cucamonga identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-54 and as Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22596-1 and -2 (the "Lopez property") Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 7262, et seq., the City obtained a fair market value appraisal of the subject real property that used a February 14, 2013 date of value. The City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value on February 20, 2013, and extended a written offer on February 26, 2013 to the owners of record Gerald Lopez and Dannelle Carpio. On April 10, 2013, the City sent a letter advising the property owners that the City sought to acquire a permanent highway easement in lieu of a fee interest, and there were no other changes in the offer being tendered. On April 10, 2013, the City sent a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity to the property owners. The City and record property owner have not reached an agreement regarding the purchase of the Subject Property Interests. However, negotiations are ongoing. (8) The real property located at 13449, 13451, and 13479 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana identified as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 1100-771-02, -03, and -09 and as Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22602-1, -2, and -3 (the "Pacific/Costanzo/Lewis property") Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 7262, et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the subject real property that used a February 14, 2013 date of value. The City Council for the City of Fontana approved the appraisals and affirmed the appraised values for the property interests on February 26, 2013. The City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga set just compensation in accordance with the appraised value on March 6, 2013, and extended a written offer on March 18, 2013 to the owners of record, Pacific/Costanzo/Lewis. One of the owner partners indicated that they would obtain their own appraisal of the subject property interests. On April 10, 2013, the City sent a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity to the property owners. The City and record property owner have not reached an agreement regarding the purchase of the Subject Property Interests. However, negotiations are ongoing. (9) The real property located at 13539 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-01 and as Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22601-1 and -2 (the "Tesoro property") Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 7262, et seq., the City obtained a fair market value appraisal of the subject real property that used a February 14, 2013 date of value. The City Council for the City of Fontana approved the appraisals and affirmed the appraised values for the property interests on February 26, 2013. The City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga set just compensation in accordance with the appraised value on March 6, 2013, and extended a written offer on March 18, 2013 to the owners of record, Tesoro Sierra Properties LLC. A representative of the owners indicated that they would obtain their own appraisal of the subject property interests. On April 10, 2013, the City sent a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity to the property owners. The City and record property owner have not reached an agreement regarding the purchase of the Subject Property Interests. However, negotiations are ongoing. P385 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 31 (10) The real property located at 7391 East Avenue in the City of Fontana identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-08 and as Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22603-1, -2, and -3 (the "Chado property") Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 7262, et seq., the City obtained a fair market value appraisal of the subject real property that used a February 14, 2013 date of value. The City Council for the City of Fontana approved the appraisals and affirmed the appraised values for the property interests on February 26, 2013. The City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga set just compensation in accordance with the appraised value on March 6, 2013, and extended a written offer on March 21, 2013 to the owners of record, Richard Chado, Darlene Chado and Anthony Chado. A representative of the owners indicated that they would talk to their attorney and try to schedule a meeting. They further indicated that they would obtain their own appraisal of the subject property interests. On April 10, 2013, the City sent a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity to the property owners. The City and record property owners have not reached an agreement regarding the purchase of the Subject Property Interests. However, negotiations are ongoing. City's Actions Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 As explained above, the City obtained written authorization on March 18, 2013 from Caltrans to hold a hearing to consider the adoption of Resolutions of Necessity for the acquisition of the necessary property interests for the construction of the proposed Project. Pursuant to the Caltrans letter dated March 18, 2013 and approved on March 29, 2013, by Brent L. Green, Chief, Caltrans Division of Right of Way and Land Surveys, the written authorization will be made part of the Cooperative Agreement between the City and Caltrans. Pursuant to the requirements of Caltrans and Caltrans' approved waiver of its 45 day notice requirement, the City provided notice on April 10, 2013 to the record owners of the Subject Property Interests pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure ("C.C.P.") Section 1245.235 of its intent to consider the adoption of resolutions of necessity at its meeting of May 1, 2013. The following is a brief summary of the City's actions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 and pursuant to Caltrans requirements for the property owners to have an opportunity to meet or communicate with the City representatives in order to discuss any design concerns or issues in connection with each of the Subject Property Interests. (1) The real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7175 Green Glen Court and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-012-01 and Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22591-1 and -2 (the "Tamayo property") In accordance with Caltrans requirements, the City on April 10, 2013 sent a letter and notice pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to the property owner James Tamayo advising the property owner of its intent to consider the adoption of a resolution of necessity at the City Council's May 1, 2013 meeting. The letter and notice advised the property owner that the owner was entitled to appear and object to the proposed adoption of the resolution of necessity if the property owner filed a written request with the City to appear within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed. The property owner did not submit a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days of April 10, 2013. Accordingly, the record property owner has waived its right pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to appear and be heard. P386 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 32 (2) The real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7201 Acorn Place and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-50 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22679-1 (the "Bhatti property") In accordance with Caltrans requirements, the City on April 10, 2013 sent a letter and notice pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to the property owners Satinderjit and Simrit Bhatti advising the property owner of its intent to consider the adoption of a resolution of necessity at the City Council's May 1, 2013 meeting. The letter and notice advised the property owner that the owner was entitled to appear and object to the proposed adoption of the resolution of necessity if the property owner filed a written request with the City to appear within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed. The property owner did not submit a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days of April 10, 2013. Accordingly, the record property owners have waived its right pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to appear and be heard. (3) The real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7211 Acorn Place and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-51 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22680-1 (the "Gamero property") In accordance with Caltrans requirements, the City on April 10, 2013 sent a letter and notice pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to the property owners Jose and Debra Gamero and The Gamero Family Trust advising the property owner of its intent to consider the adoption of a resolution of necessity at the City Council's May 1, 2013 meeting. The letter and notice advised the property owner that the owner was entitled to appear and object to the proposed adoption of the resolution of necessity if the property owner filed a written request with the City to appear within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed. The property owner did not submit a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days of April 10, 2013. Accordingly, the record owner has waived its right pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to appear and be heard. (4) The real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7221 Acorn Place and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-52 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22681-1 (the "SFR 2010 REO/Pierson property") In accordance with Caltrans requirements, the City on April 10, 2013 sent a letter and notice pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to the property owners Dinah Pierson and HUD advising the property owner of its intent to consider the adoption of a resolution of necessity at the City Council's May 1, 2013 meeting. The letter and notice advised the property owner that the owner was entitled to appear and object to the proposed adoption of the resolution of necessity if the property owner filed a written request with the City to appear within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed. The property owner did not submit a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days of April 10, 2013. Accordingly, the record owner has waived its right pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to appear and be heard. (5) The real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7231 Acorn Place and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-53 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22682-1 (the "Landino property") In accordance with Caltrans requirements, the City on April 10, 2013 sent a letter and notice pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to the property owner Carlos Landino advising the property owner of its intent to consider the adoption of a resolution of necessity at the City Council's May 1, 2013 meeting. The letter and notice advised the property owner that the owner was entitled to P387 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 33 appear and object to the proposed adoption of the resolution of necessity if the property owner filed a written request with the City to appear within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed. The property owner did not submit a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days of April 10, 2013. Accordingly, the record owner has waived its right pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to appear and be heard. (6) The real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13079 Falling Oak Drive and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-55 and Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22597-1, -2, and -3 (the "Campos property") In accordance with Caltrans requirements, the City on April 10, 2013 sent a letter and notice pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to the property owners Victor Campos and Rosenda Perez advising the property owner of its intent to consider the adoption of a resolution of necessity at the City Council's May 1, 2013 meeting. The letter and notice advised the property owner that the owner was entitled to appear and object to the proposed adoption of the resolution of necessity if the property owner filed a written request with the City to appear within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed. The property owner did not submit a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days of April 10, 2013. Accordingly, the record owner has waived its right pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to appear and be heard. (7) The real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13089 Falling Oak Drive and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-54 and Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22596-1 and -2 (the "Lopez property") In accordance with Caltrans requirements, the City on April 10, 2013 sent a letter and notice pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to the property owners George Lopez and Dannelle Carpio advising the property owner of its intent to consider the adoption of a resolution of necessity at the City Council's May 1, 2013 meeting. The letter and notice advised the property owner that the owner was entitled to appear and object to the proposed adoption of the resolution of necessity if the property owner filed a written request with the City to appear within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed. The property owner did not submit a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days of April 10, 2013. Accordingly, the record owner has waived its right pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to appear and be heard. (8) The real property in the City of Fontana, California, commonly known as 13449, 13451, and 13479 Baseline Avenue and identified as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 1100-771-02, -03, and -09 and Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22602-1, -2, and -3 (the "Pacific/Costanzo/Lewis property") In accordance with Caltrans requirements, the City on April 10, 2013 sent a letter and notice pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to the property owner Pacific/Costanzo/ Lewis and Property Development Group advising the property owner of its intent to consider the adoption of a resolution of necessity at the City Council's May 1, 2013 meeting. The letter and notice advised the property owner that the owner was entitled to appear and object to the proposed adoption of the resolution of necessity if the property owner filed a written request with the City to appear within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed. The property owner did not submit a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days of April 10, 2013. Accordingly, the record owner has waived its right pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to appear and be heard. P388 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 34 (9) The real property in the City of Fontana Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13539 Baseline Avenue and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-01 and Caltrans Parcel No. 22601-1 (the "Tesoro property") In accordance with Caltrans requirements, the City on April 10, 2013 sent a letter and notice pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to the property owner Tesoro Sierra Properties, LLC advising the property owner of its intent to consider the adoption of a resolution of necessity at the City Council's May 1, 2013 meeting. The letter and notice advised the property owner that the owner was entitled to appear and object to the proposed adoption of the resolution of necessity if the property owner filed a written request with the City to appear within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed. The property owner did not submit a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days of April 10, 2013. Accordingly, the record owner has waived its right pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to appear and be heard. (10) The real property in the City of Fontana, California, commonly known as 7391 East Avenue and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-08 and Caltrans Parcel Nos. 22603-1, -2, and -3 (the "Chado property") In accordance with Caltrans requirements, the City on April 10, 2013 sent a letter and notice pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to the property owners Richard, Darlene and Anthony Chado advising the property owner of its intent to consider the adoption of a resolution of necessity at the City Council's May 1, 2013 meeting. The letter and notice advised the property owner that the owner was entitled to appear and object to the proposed adoption of the resolution of necessity if the property owner filed a written request with the City to appear within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed. The property owner did not submit a written request to appear and be heard within 15 days of April 10, 2013. Accordingly, the record owner has waived its right pursuant to C.C.P. Section 1245.235 to appear and be heard. A. The Public Interest and Necessity Require the Proposed Project The public interest and necessity require the construction of the proposed Project. It is necessary to acquire the Subject Property Interests in order to construct the proposed Project. The proposed Project is intended to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and provide increased traffic capacity at the Interstate 15 and Base Line Road Interchange and to improve the Interstate 15 and Base Line Road interchange operations. As discussed in detail above, the primary deficiency associated with the existing interchange is caused by the interchange's geometric constraints and inadequate capacity. The intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue bisecting the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramp intersections results in a large queue of vehicles on Base Line Road. Due to short separations between the three intersections and delays caused by many signal phases, especially for left turn lane movements to the Interstate 15 entrance ramps for Westbound in the morning peak hours and Eastbound in the evening peak hour, results in heavy queuing on Base Line Road. Queuing on Base Line Road at peak hours causes heavy queuing on the exit ramps, especially for the Northbound exit ramp in the evening peak hour and the Southbound exit ramp in the morning peak hour, which can lead to traffic backing up to the Interstate 15 mainline. The two ramp intersections within the interchange are currently operating at LOS "C" or better. The intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue operates at LOS "F" and "D" during the morning and evening peak hour, respectively. However, without the interchange improvements, all three intersections are expected to operate at LOS "F" by 2030, the design horizon for the proposed Project. P389 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 35 The proposed acquisitions of real property are for public purposes, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange from KP 10.1 (PM 6.3) to KP 11.4 (PM 7.1) in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound Diamond Ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. Further, the proposed Project is fully compatible with State, Regional and Local transportation programs. The State strategy is to develop High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes on all urban freeway segments where new lane additions are needed. The State has identified Interstate 15 as a candidate for HOV lanes. With regard to regional planning, the proposed Project is compatible with the design concept and scope described in the 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP), which was found to be conforming by FHWA/FTA on October 2006. Destination 2030 identifies significant transportation infrastructure improvements planned to occur within the proposed Project limits through the year 2030. As discussed above, continued growth in housing, retail and commercial development in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana will require that Base Line Road be improved to its ultimate configuration in order to accommodate future traffic demands. The General Plans for both Cities have already identified Base Line Road as a six to eight lane facility. Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently a four lane facility, which will be widened to a six lane facility. Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is already a seven lane facility; however, the proposed Project will widen the median to accommodate the added turn lanes needed for the freeway. In addition to the widened median, the proposed Project will be adding right turn lanes to both the Eastbound and Westbound sides to allow entrance to the northbound off-ramp in the westbound direction and entrance to the commercial properties to the south in the eastbound directions. Additionally, as traffic volumes increase over time, there is a statistical probability that the total number of accident will increase. This is evident because a majority of the accidents identified in the TASAS data indicate that the accidents occurred during the peak morning and peak evening hours. The most prevalent accidents were broadside and rear end collisions. It was determined that a majority of the broadside collisions were a result of stacking of vehicles, and vehicles attempting to make left turns. The rear end collisions were a result of sudden stops by vehicles that encountered stacked vehicles on the Interstate 15 mainline as well as Base Line Road and East Avenue at the Interchange and the on-ramps and off-ramps. P390 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 36 The proposed improvements will increase capacity and improve operations of the Eastbound and Westbound directions of travel, as well as the Interstate 15 mainline where it approaches the Interchange. Therefore, the public interest and necessity require the proposed Project. B. The Proposed Project is Located in the Manner that will be Most Compatible With the Greatest Public Good and the Least Private Injury As part of the PSR-PDS and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Project Initiation Phase of the proposed Project, the Project Development Team (PDT) investigated several design alternatives for the proposed Project. The first Alternative 1-(No Build) confirmed that the levels of service at the Interchange were deteriorating rapidly, and at the 2030 traffic horizon, Alternative 1 would be operating at a Level of Service "F." The PDT considered Alternative 2-(Partial Cloverleaf) and Alternative 3-(Cloverleaf.) In their analysis of these proposed alternatives, the PDT concluded that Alternative 3 was not a viable alternative because of operational deficiencies associated with the proposed East Avenue/Southbound off-ramp intersections and the requirement of acquiring right-of-way in the Northeast quadrant of the Interchange. According to the investigations, there were planned residential subdivisions and commercial development in the Northeast quadrant. The PDT considered Alternative 2-(Partial Cloverleaf), and determined that the addition of two additional through lanes were not viable design proposals. Based on further study, it was noted that Alternative 2 would require the acquisition of right-of-way in the Southeast quadrant side of the interchange. According to early investigations, the Southeast quadrant was improved with commercial buildings, and at least fourteen (14) businesses would have to be relocated if Alternative 2 was the preferred alternative. The PDT continued to investigate other alternatives, and finally developed Alternative 4 (Preferred Alternative), which had the same design features as Alternative 2 with the exception of two eastbound dual left turn lanes that were developed in place of the Cloverleaf in the southeast quadrant. Therefore, Alternative 4 was the preferred alternative, and has been selected as the proposed Project design. Alternative 4 has the following engineering features: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound Diamond Ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. P391 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 37 With regard to the right-of-way needed as part of the proposed Project, the Cities are seeking to acquire abutter's rights, permanent highway easements and/or temporary construction easements. It should be noted that the permanent highway easements and temporary construction easements are located in areas that are either 1) already encumbered by landscaping or sidewalk easements in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the City of Fontana Community Facilities District or 2) are outside perimeter walls and are being maintained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. No structures such as residences, businesses or other improvements will be impacted by the proposed Project. The Subject Property Interests needed for the proposed Project are as follows: • A permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement with a term of thirty-six (36) months of the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7175 Green Glen Court and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-012-01 (the "Tamayo property") for streets, highways and related purposes. The acquisition areas are encumbered by landscaping and sidewalk easements in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7201 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-50 (the "Bhatti property') for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7211 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-51 (the "Gamero property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7221 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-52 (the "SFR 2010 REO/Pierson property') for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7231 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-53 (the "Landino property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights, a permanent highway easement, and a temporary construction easement for thirty-six (36) months from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13079 Falling Oak Drive and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-55 (the "Campos property") for streets, highways and related purposes. The permanent highway easement and temporary construction easement are located outside the perimeter wall of the subdivision in which the property owner's reside and has been maintained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Abutter's Rights and a permanent highway easement from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13089 Falling Oak Drive P392 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 38 and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-54 (the "Lopez property") for streets, highways and related purposes. The permanent highway easement and temporary construction easement are located outside the perimeter wall of the subdivision in which the property owner's reside and has been maintained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • A permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 13539 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana, California, and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-01 (the "Tesoro property") for streets, highways and related purposes. The acquisition area is encumbered by a landscaping easement in favor of the City of Fontana Community Facilities District and it appears that certain access rights have already been conveyed to the City of Fontana under the Tract Map associated with the development on the Subject Property; • Abutter's Access Rights, a permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 13449, 13451, and 13479 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana, California and identified as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 1100-771-02, -03, and - 09 (the "Pacific/Costanzo/Lewis property") for streets, highways and related purposes. The acquisition area is encumbered by a landscaping easement in favor of the City of Fontana Community Facilities District and it appears that certain access rights have already been conveyed to the City of Fontana under the Tract Map associated with the development on the Subject Property; • Abutter's Rights, a permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 7391 East Avenue in the City of Fontana and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-08 (the "Chado property")for streets, highway, and related purposes. In addition to considering the right-of-way impacts of the design Alternatives, Caltrans and the Cities commissioned the preparation of multiple studies and reports regarding noise, hazardous waste, visual impacts and value analysis as discussed in detail above. Caltrans and the Cities, through the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and the Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impacts (EA/FONSI) investigated and studied resource conservation, environmental justice, air quality, Title VI and NPDES=ater Quality compliance. It was determined in the IS/MND and the EA/FONSI that Alternative 4 had the least environmental impacts upon the environment within the proposed Project limits. The IS/MND made a finding that the proposed Project would not have a significant effect on the environment, and the EA/FONSI made a finding that the proposed Project would not have a significant impact.on the environment as long as certain mitigation measures, as described above, were in place. On April 27, 2011, the City of Rancho Cucamonga scheduled a Public Review Meeting at the Rancho Cucamonga City Hall during which time there were fewer than ten attendees. Although these attendees expressed some concern regarding the temporary construction impacts, the attendees recognized that there were issues with the interchange that needed to be addressed and were supportive of the proposed improvements. P393 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 39 The proposed Project is the most compatible with the greatest public good because it will improve the traffic circulation at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange. And as discussed above, four alternatives were considered and the alternative with the least impacts on the environment and on the private right-of-way was selected. Further, the right-of-way needed for the proposed Project will have no effect on the improvements on the properties nor will there be any relocation of property owners, business owners or improvements. Rather, a majority of the acquisitions are located within areas that are already encumbered with landscaping or sidewalk easements and/or are located outside subdivision perimeter walls. Therefore, the proposed Project is located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. C. The Subject Property Interests Described in the Resolutions of Necessity are Necessary for the Proposed Project As discussed in detail above, the proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests are for public purposes, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. Along with preferential traffic signal timing and synchronization, the proposed Project will 1) widen Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; 2) widen East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; 3) realign and widen the Southbound and Northbound Diamond Ramps from one to two lanes; 4) add a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and 5) add Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The proposed Project cannot be constructed without the acquisition of portions of the following Subject Property Interests for the street right-of-way, widening, and related improvements: • A permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement with a term of thirty-six (36) months of the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7175 Green Glen Court and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-012-01 (the "Tamayo property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7201 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-50 (the "Bhatti property') for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7211 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-51 (the "Gamero property') for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7221 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-52 (the "SFR 2010 REO/Pierson property") for streets, highways and related purposes; P394 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 40 • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7231 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-53 (the "Landino property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights, a permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for thirty-six (36) months from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13079 Falling Oak Drive and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-55 (the "Campos property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights and a permanent highway easement from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13089 Falling Oak Drive and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-54 (the "Lopez property")for streets, highways and related purposes; • A permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 13539 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana, California, and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-01 (the "Tesoro property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Access Rights, a permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 13449,13451, and 13479 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana, California and identified as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 1100-771-02, -03, and - 09 (the "Pacific/Costanzo/Lewis property') for streets, highways and related purposes; and • Abutter's Rights, a permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 7391 East Avenue in the City of Fontana and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-08 (the "Chado property') for streets, highways and related purposes. Accordingly, the Subject Property Interests are necessary for the proposed Project. D. The City has Made the Offer Required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code to the Owners of Record of the Real Property the City Seeks to Acquire As explained more fully above, the City, pursuant to Gov. Code Section 7262, et seq., obtained fair market value appraisals of the Subject Property Interests, set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market values, and extended written offers to the following record owners of the Subject Property Interests: • A permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement with a term of thirty-six (36) months of the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7175 Green Glen Court and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-012-01 (the "Tamayo property") for streets, highways and related purposes; P395 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 41 • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7201 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-50 (the "Bhatti property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7211 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-51 (the "Gamero property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7221 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-52 (the "SFR 2010 REO/Pierson property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 7231 Acorn Place and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-53 (the "Landino property') for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Right, a permanent highway easement, and a temporary construction easement for thirty-six (36) months from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13079 Falling Oak Drive and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-55 (the "Campos property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Rights and a permanent highway easement from the real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as 13089 Falling Oak Drive and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 0227-693-54 (the "Lopez property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • A permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 13539 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana, California, and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-01 (the "Tesoro property") for streets, highways and related purposes; • Abutter's Access Rights, a permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 13449, 13451, and 13479 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana, California and identified as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 1100-771-02, -03, and - 09 (the "Pacific/Costanzo/Lewis property") for streets, highways and related purposes; and • Abutter's Rights, a permanent highway easement and a temporary construction easement for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 7391 East Avenue in the City of Fontana and identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 1100-771-08 (the "Chado property") for streets, highways and related purposes. P396 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Resolutions of Necessity— Base Line Road/1-15 Interchange Project May 1, 2013 Page 42 The property owners have not accepted the City's offers to purchase the Subject Property Interests. Accordingly, it is necessary that the City Council consider the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests by eminent domain. Staff recommends the adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity and to authorize the City Attorney and the City Manager to take action and execute all documents for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. The adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity requires a 4/5ths vote of the City Council. The following documents referenced above and which are on file in the City Clerk's Office and/or the Engineering Department, are incorporated in this report by this reference: Resolutions of Necessity attached hereto • City of Rancho Cucamonga Circulation Element of the General Plan • City of Fontana Circulation Element of the General Plan • Etiwanda Specific Plan Circulation Elements •. West End Specific Plan • Project Study Report • Project Report • Initial Study, Environmental Checklist, Traffic Reports, Noise Analysis, and Technical Reports prepared in connection with Negative Declaration with the Final Initial Study • Negative Declaration/FONSI • Notice of Determination filed in connection with Negative Declaration/ Finding of No Significant Impacts • Agenda Reports, Public Notice and Minutes of meetings relating to the proposed Project and the environmental documents discussed above • Notices of Decision to Appraise by Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana • Offer letters and revised offer letters sent to owners pursuant to Government Code Section 7262, et seq. • Notices sent to owners pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 • Caltrans written authorization regarding Resolutions of Necessity • Extra-Territorial Agreement • Resolutions by Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana Authorizing Adoption of RONS by City of Rancho Cucamonga • Other written correspondence received from the property owners • Right of Way Appraisal Map Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JCW/KRB:ls P397 RESOLUTION NO. 13-046 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13079 FALLING OAK DRIVE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 0227-693- 55, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal corporation, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Section 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to exercise its respective powers of eminent domain to acquire the property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution, under a joint powers agreement entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana on February 26, 2013, pursuant to Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California and Sections 12, and California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.140(a) and (b). Because Interstate 15, where it intersects with Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and with Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is a State Highway, the California Transportation Commission ("CTC") is the body authorized to consider the adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity. On March 29, 2013, the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans") authorized the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to conduct a hearing on the Resolution of Necessity and to adopt the Resolution of Necessity by a 4/5ths vote of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council. The property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution that the City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire are for a public use, namely to alleviate existing and future traffic congestion at on-ramps and off-ramps during peak morning and evening hours within the proposed Project limits, to accommodate current and future automobile and truck traffic, and to alleviate unsatisfactory conditions associated with the existing Interchange configuration at the Interstate 15 Interchange at Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and at Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana ("proposed Project"), and for all purposes necessary and -- convenient thereto in connection with the proposed Project pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19; California Government Code Sections 6500, 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010, et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including, but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.130, 1240.140 (a) and (b), 1240.250, 1240.350, 1240.410, 1240.420, 1240.510, 1240.530, 1240.610, 1240.640, 1240.650; Streets and Highways Code Sections 102, 114 and 130, and other provisions of the law. Campos Resolution No. 13-046 - Page 1 of 7 P398 Section 3. The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire abutter's rights which include air, light and view and abutter's access rights, a permanent highway easement of 43 square feet and a temporary construction easement of 1,075 square feet for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 13079 Falling Oak Drive, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number 0227-693-55 in connection with the proposed Project ("Subject Property Interests.") The legal descriptions of the Subject Property Interests are attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" to this Resolution of Necessity. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated herein by this reference. The real property has a gross land area of 12,945 square feet and is irregular in shape. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be physically impacted by the proposed acquisition because no land or improvements will be acquired as part of the proposed Project. The acquisition areas are located outside a perimeter wall for the subdivision in which the real property is located and has been maintained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Section 4. The proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests are for a public purpose, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound diamond ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The primary operational deficiency associated with the existing interchange is caused by the interchange's geometric constraints and inadequate capacity. The intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue bisecting the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramp intersections results in a large queue of vehicles on Base Line Road. Due to short separations between the three intersections and delays caused by many signal phases, especially for left turn movements to the Interstate 15 ramps for Westbound traffic in the morning peak hours and Eastbound traffic in the evening peak hours, there is heavy queuing on Base Line Road. The queuing on Base Line Road during these peak hours, results in heavy queuing on the exit ramps, which includes heavy queuing for the Northbound exit ramp in the evening peak hours and for the Southbound exit ramp in the morning peak hours. The queuing at the exit ramps during the peak hours also leads to traffic backing up on the Interstate 15 mainline. Alternatives Considered for the proposed Proiect The City of Rancho Cucamonga analyzed the relative effectiveness of three proposed project alternatives and a no-build alternative, to accommodate forecasted year 2030 traffic at the Interchange. Alternative 1, the no-build alternative showed that if there were no improvements Campos Resolution No. 13-046 - Page 2 of 7 P399 made to the Interchange, the levels of service for traffic circulation in 2030 would be LOS "F," which is the worst possible level of service, and there would be a substantial increase in traffic accidents. Alternative 3, the cloverleaf, proposed the construction of two cloverleafs, one cloverleaf would be located in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange and the other cloverleaf would be located in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. Alternative 3 was not considered a viable alternative because not only did it have significant design and operational issues, it would have required the acquisition of right-of-way in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange. The acquisition of the right-of-way in the northeast quadrant would have resulted in significant impacts to current and future planned residential and commercial development. Alternative 2, partial cloverleaf, and Alternative 4, preferred alternative, were both considered as proposed projects. They had similar design features except for the following modifications to Alternative 4: • Base Line Road would be widened slightly more on the southerly side; • The Northbound Loop entrance ramp would be replaced by Eastbound dual left turn lanes to the Northbound Interstate 15 freeway; • The Diamond entrance ramp would be widened to receive dual left turns from Eastbound Base Line Road left lanes; • The Northbound exit ramp that utilizes existing East Avenue undercrossing bridge would need to be widened to accommodate the two lane exit; and • Two new bridges and one widened bridge would be required to be constructed. Alternative 4 was developed and selected as the preferred alternative for the Proposed Project because it met the purpose and need for the Interchange improvements and it eliminated the need for the acquisition of commercial buildings and the acquisition and relocation of fourteen (14) businesses in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. General Plan and Specific Plan Compliance Base Line Road is currently a four-lane roadway within the proposed Project limits. Because of recent and future planned housing, retail and commercial developments in the cities, improvements to Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 Interchange are necessary to accommodate population growth and the resulting increase in traffic demands. The Cities of Rancho Cucamonga's and Fontana's Circulation Elements of their respective General Plans specify that Base Line Road is intended to be a six to eight lane major highway or arterial within the proposed Project limits, and is intended to provide efficient high volume traffic flow within their Cities and the region. The proposed Project conforms to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Circulation Elements of its General Plan, General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require that Base Line Road be a six-lane Major Divided Highway within the proposed Project limits. Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently improved with four lanes within the proposed Project limits. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan specifies that six lanes within the proposed Project limits are sufficient to meet local and regional circulations needs for future growth. Campos Resolution No. 13-046 - Page 3 of 7 P400 The proposed Project also conforms to the City of Fontana's Circulation Elements of its General Plan and West End Specific Plan, which identifies Baseline Avenue as a major east-west highway, which can accommodate six to eight lanes of travel and allowing for raised medians. Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is currently improved with six lanes from Citrus Avenue to Interstate 15. The City of Fontana's General Plan specifies that within the proposed Project limits, it is recommended that arterial segments that are located between freeway ramps and the next parallel facility, on either side of the freeway, such as Baseline Avenue at Interstate 15, be planned with an additional lane in each direction beyond its designated functional classification. These lanes will function as "auxiliary lanes" for more freeway access capacity and more efficient traffic flow between the ramps and the adjacent intersections and can serve as dedicated right turn lanes at the next intersection. Section 5. As a proposed discretionary action by a local agency, the proposed Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. ("CEQA.") Further, because the proposed Project will be partially funded by the Federal Government, it is subject to the National Environmental Policy Act NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c) ("NEPA.") Accordingly, the proposed Project was subject to both federal and state environmental review. Caltrans was the designated lead agency under the current Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") and Caltrans' stewardship program. Therefore, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 327, Caltrans was tasked with being the lead agency for CEQA and NEPA compliance and for providing full over-sight on the planning, design and right-of-way acquisition for the proposed Project. As the lead agency for the proposed Project, Caltrans commissioned the preparation of an Initial Study along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") as required under CEQA, and an Environmental Assessment along with Finding of No Significant Impacts ("EA/FONSI") as required under NEPA. Caltrans studied and analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project to identify potentially significant impacts to the environment and to identify the most feasible alternative that would accomplish the basic project objectives while lessening or eliminating any potentially significant project impacts to the environment. Pursuant to the requirements under CEQA and NEPA, checklists were utilized in order to identify physical, biological, social and economic factors that might be affected by the proposed Project. In many cases, background studies performed in connection with the proposed Project indicated no impacts under CEQA and NEPA. The following factors were identified as having less than significant impact and were studied further for the purposes of the proposed Project: Visual/Aesthetics Review, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, Air Quality, NPDES/Water Quality, and Noise. Visual/Aesthetics Review For visual and aesthetics' review, compliance with CEQA requires, at a minimum, that a Scenic Resource Evaluation be conducted. Under NEPA, a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) is required to assess visual impacts of the proposed Project. A VIA, dated February 2011, was prepared as part of the proposed Project to satisfy the requirements of both CEQA and NEPA. Campos Resolution No. 13-046 - Page 4 of 7 P401 The VIA assessed the potential visual impacts and analyzed any potential changes of views of or from Interstate 15 and Base Line Road by the proposed Project. After performing extensive study and review, the VIA discussed the impacts of the proposed alternatives and made recommendations that certain measures be implemented in order to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse visual impacts. The measures recommended in the VIA have been considered as part of the design and construction of the proposed Project. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials An Initial Site Assessment (ISA) dated March 2007 along with a Supplemental Initial Site Assessment dated March 2011 (SISA) were prepared in order to assess the potential for hazardous waste and materials as part of the proposed Project. After having performed assessments, further study and multiple testing to determine the nature and extent of the potential for hazardous waste and materials within the proposed Project limits, certain handling recommendations were made in order to address Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) and asbestos containing materials (ACMs). In addition, a Limited Site Investigation was conducted to test for herbicides, pesticides, and metals associated with the applications of herbicides and pesticides during the operation of a former nursery within the proposed Project limits, there were no recommendations for further investigations of this former agricultural site. Air Quality and NPDES/Water Quality An Air Quality Analysis, dated February 2011, was prepared to review potential air quality issues associated with the proposed Project, and a storm water data report was prepared and approved by Caltrans on June 1, 2011 to consider water quality impacts of the proposed Project. Based on the findings of the analysis and report, no mitigation measures were needed for Air Quality and NPDES/water quality impacts as part of the proposed Project. Noise A Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) was prepared and approved on both March 4, 2011 and March 8, 2011. Based on the NADIR, when compared with Alternative 1-no build alternative, the noise levels of Alternatives 2 and 4 were expected to only increase by no more than 3dBA. Therefore, this increase in noise would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, sound barriers were not recommended for Alternative 4 under CEQA and NEPA standards. However, Caltrans requested, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga committed to the construction of a sound barrier (SB No. 4) at a height of approximately 14 feet adjacent to the off-ramp in the Northwest quadrant of the Interchange within the proposed Project limits. The purpose of which was to address potential noise impacts to the residences in the adjacent subdivision associated with the new location of the off-ramp in the northwest quadrant of the Interchange. Additional NEPA Requirements In addition to the above matters, NEPA also required consideration of Title VI, Independent Utility/Logical Termini and Environmental Justice. Campos Resolution No. 13-046 - Page 5 of 7 P402 Mitigation Requirements under CEQA and NEPA The proposed Project would have no significantly adverse effect on natural communities or wetlands or other waters within the proposed Project limits, because the following mitigation measures were required to reduce the potential effects to insignificance: • Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board; • Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game; • United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 14; and • Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination. The Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination letter was issued by FHWA (Federal Highway Commission) on June 15, 2011. With regard to the remaining mitigation measures, there was the option of either purchasing mitigation credits from an off-site mitigation bank or participation in an in-lieu fee program; however, final determination would be made by the applicable resource agency. Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Finding of No Significant Impacts The Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Finding of No Significant Impacts along with the mitigation requirements previously identified, were approved on September 30, 2011. The Notices of Availability were distributed to federal, state, regional and local agencies, and certain elected officials and property owners and were published in the appropriate publications on September 30, 2011. There have been no challenges to the IS/MND and EA/FONSI. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The property described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto is necessary for the proposed Project; D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owners of record. Section 7. The City has complied with the notice requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. Section 8. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council on May 1, 2013, which includes the Staff Report dated May 1, Campos Resolution No. 13-046 - Page 6 of 7 P403 2013 and all documents referenced therein, including the environmental documents referenced above, and any testimony, records, and documents produced at the hearing, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 9. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney's office and staff to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. Campos Resolution No. 13-046 - Page 7 of 7 P404 EXHIBIT A P405 EXHIBIT "A" 22597-1 THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF LOT 55 OF TRACT NO. 16776, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED IN BOOK 320, PAGES 95 THROUGH 100, OF TRACT MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1260.00 FEET, TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 10 010'52"WEST SAID CURVE ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 54.70 FEETALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2029'15"TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1248.50 FEET TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 14 019'54" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 54.16 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2 029'07"TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 31022'10" EAST 1.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 43 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD IF ANY. SAND S GAL v XICOTEN CATL�p E. A SALAZAR XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 NO. 5507 LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 sTEXP. 9-50-" P{ '9re Or CP FoP P406 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL 22597-2 THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF A FREEWAY AND THE GRANTOR HEREBY RELEASES AND RELINQUISHES TO THE GRANTEE ANY AND ALL ABUTTER'S RIGHTS, INCLUDING ACCESS RIGHTS APPURTENANT TO GRANTOR'S REMAINING PROPERTY, OVER AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF LOT 55 OF TRACT NO. 16776, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FILE IN BOOK 320, PAGES 95 THROUGH 100 OF TRACT MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT, BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1260.00 FEET TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 14 051'55"WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 48.31 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2°11'48" TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1248.50 FEET TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 14 019'54"WEST; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTHEASTERLY 54.16 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2 029'07" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 31022'10"WEST 10.12 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 11.00 FEET NORTHWESTERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT `B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. LAND So L F C� XICOTENCATL p XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 NO N0.. 5507 LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 s EXP. 9-30-14 P 9TF OF 0A nQ- 08- SBd - 15-PM 6.6 -22597 (22597-2) P407 EXHIBIT "A" TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT PARCEL 22597-3 THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF LOT 55 OF TRACT NO. 16776, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED IN BOOK 320, PAGES 95 THROUGH 100, OF TRACT MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1260.00 FEET TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 14°51'55"WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 48.31 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2°11'48" TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1248.50 FEET TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 14 019'54"WEST; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTHEASTERLY 54.16 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2 029'07" TO A POINT LOCATED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, DISTANT NORTH 31-22'10" WEST 1.67 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 31022'10" WEST 10.12 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 11.00 FEET NORTHWESTERLY FROM SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, BEING A CURVE CONCENTRIC WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1271.00 FEET, TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 10022'24'WEST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 100.26 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4°31'11" TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 18°03'31" EAST 11.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 1,075 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. AND SLR U XICCTENCATL � E. A SALAZAR XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 No. EXP. 9-30 30 -14 LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 �qr o��e F OF C p'0 P408 EXHIBIT B P409 , b /yd0 LO j � � Q CL r U Q oo a d W W Q LO U W , m (p d }- n p 0 lVIOVa a o J G, U z w M„ZS,OI.OIN ; a --------------- __ = -- _ - N O O r O LO V1 c O � N 0) N N � ° TI-0) ct: Q� �� O / LO LO rr vl O N 0 N p J N z 71 0 w f cli V ---------------------------- O I U) LU m W J a CO N J X � � i un ¢ Z i O O LLI � Q Q --------------------------i o o < a O z 0 � \ co p 0 Q U f � O 0 1 nm I Lr) _ n C) U --------- r, 0 0 --------------1 n 0) a)z LLJ Y ; N - ° ° No L o U¢ U V) II oo o o I J LO o a J '-Mo � C; W H U o N N < N II II z � � N7 O Ln J �_ O lP Q ON Q �. [if JNII � z --- OVIOVa) 3,LOCKRIS a L7JV7d N,7,LSLYXOJ 3 P410 0R LO iV J j _ U Q 00 G 0 � Q O Z N inn lV O oES I .� 4 W W Q U O i0 e.�j -1 F- Q li O z X <v N3 -- ( rn - of 00.1 Oil G O N Nf a If ' 1 rn ° I � o 1 LO U') �! 1 N ° � N � o ¢FD 1 � � OZ � ° 2 ° 1 � 1 U ------------------ N31'22'10 W I W ^ °0 3 1 1 0 I in J i O Q z° � n nai i orn I cn ¢ O o � xl i �N 1� o0 00 W Uin O Z j <hN 1 OK p Q 1 Z X Z 1 LU I 3: ° Q ------------------------i Ln J � 1 � a n W O ! ° ° °¢ N 1 z U I I m W Q rn I Z m p I ON O U J i w m o _ Ln :� U ---- F- � v LLJ Y --------t o CO c° N o 6 11 0 0 ^a p Z O !— N W < 11 Z O ~ J° i cc W n N tb W J O J Q m O Q N Z CL In N O Q co:- O I H W N In I in J N r I Ln a Ja O lVIOHJ) 3lOCb.BIS I na I L7jV7d ULV LSLVyoj 2 P411 OR J O N ( C U Q o0 4 O Z N n r7 W W W J N� U M J ~O Q 4 p �VIpV21 i O OAS X N Z W M„ZS,OI.OIN ------ ( rn ' r O M v I � o 1 Lo O N N N J N Q a C N / Z V O � 1 O z C/ 1 ~ d Z I � 1 -------------lNIOVa N ��W gg 13 U 31'22 10,12' I - 7 o l m J co I d D .O I N � /^ d n I o 1 V 1- N ~O i j (ON 1 Op mJ < m J \ o dNI o � X >- fr : I o If z W Z j "� C) Q -----------------------' o m 3 (Z � I O I F- � nQ � U I r, mON I o U taf It Q I -- z O ° Z M 2 UC) < U ---------- ° m W ----------i 11 v Y I oo U N O Q ^ a ° ° � ¢ o N M N O 0 3 II aw• Z n Lo Q� o O N t Q co N W J o Z pj J Q O Q U Z CL N ,ZO'IL J •N0^ a 3„ 1S 1�,�0.8 W NN Ln a o �a Of I --_ IVIOV8) 3,10 fb.81S O I n o I � m L7JV7d IYJLSLYXOy z P412 RESOLUTION NO. 13-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13539 BASELINE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 1100-771-01, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal corporation, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Section 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to exercise its respective powers of eminent domain to acquire the property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution, under a joint powers agreement entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana on February 26, 2013, pursuant to Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California and Sections 12, and California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.140(a) and (b). Because Interstate 15, where it intersects with Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and with Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is a State Highway, the California Transportation Commission ("CTC") is the body authorized to consider the adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity. On March 29, 2013, the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans") authorized the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to conduct a hearing on the Resolution of Necessity and to adopt the Resolution of Necessity by a 4/5ths vote of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council. The property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution that the City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire are for a public use, namely to alleviate existing and future traffic congestion at on-ramps and off-ramps during peak morning and evening hours within the proposed Project limits, to accommodate current and future automobile and truck traffic, and to alleviate unsatisfactory conditions associated with the existing Interchange configuration at the Interstate 15 Interchange at Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and at Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana ("proposed Project"), and for all purposes necessary and convenient thereto in connection with the proposed Project pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19; California Government Code Sections 6500, 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010, et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including, but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.130, 1240.140 (a) and (b), 1240.250, 1240.350, 1240.410, 1240.420, Tesoro Resolution No. 13-047 - Page 1 of 7 P413 1240.510, 1240.530, 1240.610, 1240.640, 1240.650; Streets and Highways Code Sections 102, 114 and 130, and other provisions of the law. Section 3. The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire a permanent highway easement of 4,382 square feet and a temporary construction easement of 4,136 square feet for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 13539 Baseline Avenue, in the City of Fontana and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number 1100-771-01 in connection with the proposed Project ("Subject Property Interests.") The legal descriptions of the Subject Property Interests are attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" to this Resolution of Necessity. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated herein by this reference. The real property has a gross land area of 91,476 square feet and is irregular in shape. It is improved with commercial buildings, which will not be physically impacted by the proposed acquisition because no land or improvements will be acquired as part of the proposed Project. The property interests the City seeks to acquire are located in an area already encumbered by a landscaping easement in favor of the City of Fontana Community Facilities District. Section 4. The proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests are for a public purpose, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound diamond ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The primary operational deficiency associated with the existing interchange is caused by the interchange's geometric constraints and inadequate capacity. The intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue bisecting the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramp intersections results in a large queue of vehicles on Base Line Road. Due to short separations between the three intersections and delays caused by many signal phases, especially for left turn movements to the Interstate 15 ramps for Westbound traffic in the morning peak hours and Eastbound traffic in the evening peak hours, there is heavy queuing on Base Line Road. The queuing on Base Line Road during these peak hours, results in heavy queuing on the exit ramps, which includes heavy queuing for the Northbound exit ramp in the evening peak hours and for the Southbound exit ramp in the morning peak hours. The queuing at the exit ramps during the peak hours also leads to traffic backing up on the Interstate. 15 mainline. Tesoro Resolution No. 13-047 - Page 2 of 7 P414 Alternatives Considered for the proposed Project The City of Rancho Cucamonga analyzed the relative effectiveness of three proposed project alternatives and a no-build alternative, to accommodate forecasted year 2030 traffic at the Interchange. Alternative 1, the no-build alternative showed that if there were no improvements made to the Interchange, the levels of service for traffic circulation in 2030 would be LOS "F," which is the worst possible level of service, and there would be a substantial increase in traffic accidents. Alternative 3, the cloverleaf, proposed the construction of two cloverleafs, one cloverleaf would be located in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange and the other cloverleaf would be located in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. Alternative 3 was not considered a viable alternative because not only did it have significant design and operational issues, it would have required the acquisition of right-of-way in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange. The acquisition of the right-of-way in the northeast quadrant would have resulted in significant impacts to current and future planned residential and commercial development. Alternative 2, partial cloverleaf, and Alternative 4, preferred alternative, were both considered as proposed projects. They had similar design features except for the following modifications to Alternative 4: • Base Line Road would be widened slightly more on the southerly side; • The Northbound Loop entrance ramp would be replaced by Eastbound dual left turn lanes to the Northbound Interstate 15 freeway; The Diamond entrance ramp would be widened to receive dual left turns from Eastbound Base Line Road left lanes; • The Northbound exit ramp that utilizes existing East Avenue undercrossing bridge would need to be widened to accommodate the two lane exit; and Two new bridges and one widened bridge would be required to be constructed. Alternative 4 was developed and selected as the preferred alternative for the Proposed Project because it met the purpose and need for the Interchange improvements and it eliminated the need for the acquisition of commercial buildings and the acquisition and relocation of fourteen (14) businesses in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. General Plan and Specific Plan Compliance Base Line Road is currently a four-lane roadway within the proposed Project limits. Because of recent and future planned housing, retail and commercial developments in the cities, improvements to Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 Interchange are necessary to accommodate population growth and the resulting increase in traffic demands. The Cities of Rancho Cucamonga's and Fontana's Circulation Elements of their respective General Plans specify that Base Line Road is intended to be a six to eight lane major highway or arterial within the proposed Project limits, and is intended to provide efficient high volume traffic flow within their Cities and the region. The proposed Project conforms to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Circulation Elements of its General Plan, General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require that Base Line Road be a six-lane Major Divided Highway within the proposed Project limits. Base Line Tesoro Resolution No. 13-047 - Page 3 of 7 P415 Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently improved with four lanes within the proposed Project limits. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan specifies that six lanes within the proposed Project limits are sufficient to meet local and regional circulations needs for future growth. The proposed Project also conforms to the City of Fontana's Circulation Elements of its General Plan and West End Specific Plan, which identifies Baseline Avenue as a major east-west highway, which can accommodate six to eight lanes of travel and allowing for raised medians. Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is currently improved with six lanes from Citrus Avenue to Interstate 15. The City of Fontana's General Plan specifies that within the proposed Project limits, it is recommended that arterial segments that are located between freeway ramps and the next parallel facility, on either side of the freeway, such as Baseline Avenue at Interstate 15, be planned with an additional lane in each direction beyond its designated functional classification. These lanes will function as "auxiliary lanes" for more freeway access capacity and more efficient traffic flow between the ramps and the adjacent intersections and can serve as dedicated right turn lanes at the next intersection. Section 5. As a proposed discretionary action by a local agency, the proposed Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. ("CEQA.") Further, because the proposed Project will be partially funded by the Federal Government, it is subject to the National Environmental Policy Act NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c) ("NEPA.") Accordingly, the proposed Project was subject to both federal and state environmental review. Caltrans was the designated lead agency under the current Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") and Caltrans' stewardship program. Therefore, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 327, Caltrans was tasked with being the lead agency for CEQA and NEPA compliance and for providing full over-sight on the planning, design and right-of-way acquisition for the proposed Project. As the lead agency for the proposed Project, Caltrans commissioned the preparation of an Initial Study along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") as required under CEQA, and an Environmental Assessment along with Finding of No Significant Impacts ("EA/FONSI") as required under NEPA. Caltrans studied and analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project to identify potentially significant impacts to the environment and to identify the most feasible alternative that would accomplish the basic project objectives while lessening or eliminating any potentially significant project impacts to the environment. Pursuant to the requirements under CEQA and NEPA, checklists were utilized in order to identify physical, biological, social and economic factors that might be affected by the proposed Project. In many cases, background studies performed in connection with the proposed Project indicated no impacts under CEQA and NEPA. The following factors were identified as having less than significant impact and were studied further for the purposes of the proposed Project: Visual/Aesthetics Review, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, Air Quality, NPDES/Water Quality, and Noise. Tesoro Resolution No. 13-047 - Page 4 of 7 P416 Visual/Aesthetics Review For visual and aesthetics' review, compliance with CEQA requires, at a minimum, that a Scenic Resource Evaluation be conducted. Under NEPA, a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) is required to assess visual impacts of the proposed Project. A VIA, dated February 2011, was prepared as part of the proposed Project to satisfy the requirements of both CEQA and NEPA. The VIA assessed the potential visual impacts and analyzed any potential changes of views of or from Interstate 15 and Base Line Road by the proposed Project. After performing extensive study and review, the VIA discussed the impacts of the proposed alternatives and made recommendations that certain measures be implemented in order to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse visual impacts. The measures recommended in the VIA have been considered as part of the design and construction of the proposed Project. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials An Initial Site Assessment (ISA) dated March 2007 along with a Supplemental Initial Site Assessment dated March 2011 (SISA) were prepared in order to assess the potential for hazardous waste and materials as part of the proposed Project. After having performed assessments, further study and multiple testing to determine the nature and extent of the potential for hazardous waste and materials within the proposed Project limits, certain handling recommendations were made in order to address Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) and asbestos containing materials (ACMs). In addition, a Limited Site Investigation was conducted to test for herbicides, pesticides, and metals associated with the applications of herbicides and pesticides during the operation of a former nursery within the proposed Project limits, there were no recommendations for further investigations of this former agricultural site. Air Quality and NPDES/Water Quality An Air Quality Analysis, dated February 2011, was prepared to review potential air quality issues associated with the proposed Project, and a storm water data report was prepared and approved by Caltrans on June 1, 2011 to consider water quality impacts of the proposed Project. Based on the findings of the analysis and report, no mitigation measures were needed for Air Quality and NPDES/water quality impacts as part of the proposed Project. Noise A Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) was prepared and approved on both March 4, 2011 and March 8, 2011. Based on the NADR, when compared with Alternative 1-no build alternative, the noise levels of Alternatives 2 and 4 were expected to only increase by no more than 3dBA. Therefore, this increase in noise would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, sound barriers were not recommended for Alternative 4 under CEQA and NEPA standards. However, Caltrans requested, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga committed to the construction of a sound barrier (SB No. 4) at a height of approximately 14 feet adjacent to the off-ramp in the Northwest quadrant of the Interchange within the proposed Project limits. The purpose of which was to address potential noise impacts to the residences in the adjacent subdivision associated with the new location of the off-ramp in the northwest quadrant of the Interchange. Tesoro Resolution No. 13-047 - Page 5 of 7 P417 Additional NEPA Requirements In addition to the above matters, NEPA also required consideration of Title VI, Independent Utility/Logical Termini and Environmental Justice. Mitigation Requirements under CEQA and NEPA The proposed Project would have no significantly adverse effect on natural communities or wetlands or other waters within the proposed Project limits, because the following mitigation measures were required to reduce the potential effects to insignificance: • Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board; • Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game; • United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 14; and • Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination. The Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination letter was issued by FHWA (Federal Highway Commission) on June 15, 2011. With regard to the remaining mitigation measures, there was the option of either purchasing mitigation credits from an off-site mitigation bank or participation in an in-lieu fee program; however, final determination would be made by the applicable resource agency. Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Finding of No Significant Impacts The Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Finding of No Significant Impacts along with the mitigation requirements previously identified, were approved on September 30, 2011. The Notices of Availability were distributed to federal, state, regional and local agencies, and certain elected officials and property owners and were published in the appropriate publications on September 30, 2011. There have been no challenges to the IS/MND and EA/FONSI. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The property described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto is necessary for the proposed Project; D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owners of record. Tesoro Resolution No. 13-047 - Page 6 of 7 P418 Section 7. The City has complied with the notice requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. Section 8. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council on May 1, 2013, which includes the Staff Report dated May 1, 2013 and all documents referenced therein, including the environmental documents referenced above, and any testimony, records, and documents produced at the hearing, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 9. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney's office and staff to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. Tesoro Resolution No. 13-047 - Page 7 of 7 P419 EXHIBIT A P420 EXHIBIT"A" 22601-1 THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15412, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED IN BOOK 189, PAGES 71 THROUGH 72, OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL l; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 89 058'57" EAST 6.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47 003'46" EAST 39.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 058'57" EAST 185.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46 049'42" EAST 39.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 036'35" EAST 6.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 00°23'25" WEST 12.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 036'35" WEST 7.20 FEET THENCE NORTH 45°31'54" WEST 30.53 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 18.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM SAID NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 89 058'57" WEST 194.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44 035'02" WEST 39.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 058'57" WEST 4.25 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 00 001'03" EAST 19.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 4, 382 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD IF ANY. AND SGT U XICOTENCATL E. A SALAZAR XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 EXNO. 5507 P. 9-30-14 LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 s�T �\� F OF CF F0 P421 EXHIBIT"A" TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 22601-2 THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15412, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED IN BOOK 189, PAGES 71 THROUGH 72, OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT LOCATED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL DISTANT SOUTH 00°01'03"WEST 19.09 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 89 058'57"EAST 4.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44 035'02" EAST 39.43 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 18.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 89 058'57"EAST 194.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°31'54"EAST 30.53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 036'35"EAST 7.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 023'25" WEST 35.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 058'57" WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 023'25" EAST 23.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°31'54" WEST 25.09 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 33.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM SAID NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 89 058'57" WEST 196.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44 035'02" WEST 31.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 001'03" WEST 19.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 058'57" WEST 9.25 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 00°01'03" EAST 28.41 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 4, 136 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS 1 OF 2 P422 ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD IF ANY. SAND S F C� XICOTENCATL � X[COTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 SALAZAR No. 5507 LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 EXP. s-30-1 a sT 9lF DF CA \�O� 2OF2 P423 EXHIBIT B P424 _ 3„9Z,£Z.00N ,LO'L9 3„9Z,£Z.O_ON ,11'09Z E (OR y IJ- a Ldp w h Q n o U Q 00 a N n✓1 r M 6 W W J o f U M Ln J Q Q z p o Zx S ^� J E0 0'1 pR A\ C) 007L N N N I 00'81 o � � � Z w z� 00 0 v a m _ oam H <M 3 w M U') W o 00 U N 40 C7 a Lo W N w 3 00 II Do m J 3 0 LLI � a I 0 c� 00 Q mw 00 V) Q z V) J p X } 00 Lu Z z a 0 U O a I �96 �2o5�6� N C:) O O O O M 11 T r LJ �. .219�Q J 6s Q cD O _ 6f u7. a3www333w 0 Z 1'99Z 3„£0,10.00N W i o i M N M ° LL '� I zm Minncoco � l �j ?� J O M N ;”) p p ~ Q 0 N O O> Q> O M M M f..i a � Z Z N) (N Ln z z z ^r^ N N N v 1 N M a' Lo N ci I J J J J J J J J Z W Z UCl- ()f Q CO Q M CL J m W � U d I a II ' Ll 1 l l L1 A Y LL EVLY P425 _ 3„SZ,£Z,OON l0'L8 3„SZ,£Z.00N �� ll'08Z O OR * y F a Ldp o U Q oo Q N M � a WwQ n � > p Q O O I M o U Zx aZ S1 91 all * S 3 0n N � o � Ln 007L N I ,00'81 Z N Z 00 ££ N w O r N a O w Z\ In umm U I � rn X¢ w oo O N ¢m Lr) W N 3 !j 3 aw 00 II v a Z O n in ¢ w m J 3 00 a0 Lo H a I 00 00 00 U 00 L) W 00 Z N Z U) X } 00 W a o W O � N U Nn Q �9 O �9sp ��� 61 0 U W `” ll lb'8Z 3 w ti °o 3„£0,10.00N Y o; ,Z l'89Z (A d < v 1 Z I iT in O O p ^ O M M u O N N O O N N O N O O O N N O M C,� M O N CJl O O aim ws v a ¢a ~ w w 3 w 3 w 3 3 w I < ,n m in in n o M 1� in in in N - N In N O !n M w 0 V) M M Z 00 c O M M N O In M O C4 OrnOrn 000000000Ln O 00 00 00 O O 00 O N N V) Z Z V) Z Z N Z Z Z J J J J J J J J J J J J JfINJAV ,LEV,7 May 1, 2013 City Council Meeting —Closed Session Item D3 and City Council Agenda Item N3 (Resolution No. 13-047, page P412) Staff Report begins on page P355. Resolutions of Necessity for the acquisition by eminent domain of portions of certain real property interests for public purposes in connection with the Interstate 15 and Base Line Road Interchange Project in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. Correspondence received from Tesoro Sierra Properties,LLC,property owner,in objection. HINSON GRAVELLE & ADAIR LLP L A W Y E R S A REGISTERED LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP DOUGLAS A.GRAVELLE TELEPHONE(661)294-0111 Direct Dial(661)294-0116 FACSIMILE(661)294-0134 gnselk@hinsongravelleeom www.hinsongravelle.mm Via Fax (909-477-2849 and 909-477-2746) April 29, 2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Re: Resolution of Necessity APN#1100-771-01 /Caltrans Parcel#1422601-1,2 Dear Ms. Reynolds: We represent Tesoro Refining& Marketing Co. LLC and Tesoro Sierra Properties, LLC (individually and collectively"Tesoro"), and are sending this letter on behalf of Tesoro. This letter follows up on our April 25, 2013 letter requesting an opportunity to appear and be heard at the May 1, 2013 hearing on the above matter. Please be advised that in lieu of appearing at the May 1, 2013 hearing, Tesoro hereby provides the following comments, and requests these comments be considered at the May 1, 2013 hearing on the matter. First, the Resolution of Necessity refers to a thirty-six (36) month construction easement. Tesoro believes that the right to engage in construction on the Subject Property for thirty- six(36)months is excessive from a temporal perspective, and thus the Resolution of Necessity runs afoul of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.030(c) (property sought to be acquired must be necessary for the project). Second, the Offer to Purchase dated March 18, 2013 contains three (3)conditions (in Section 4 on page 7 of the March 18,2013 Offer to Purchase)regarding soil conditions, title insurance and timely acceptance, which conditions are not permissible and/or not reasonable under California Government Code Section 7267.2. Respectfully, to Douglas Gravelle DAG/hg cc: Tesoro Kirsten Bowman, Esq. (via e-mail) 28470 AVENUE STANFORD,SUITE 350,VALENCIA,CALIFORNIA 91355 2013-04-25 12:19 ElevenPS 1 » 9094772746 P 1/2 HINSON GRAVE!J R & ADAIR LLP J.AWYERS A REGISTER=1.164,M10 111111217Y PAIVINRRSHW ^.91TOAVENUE STANFORD TE1J3PIfONE(661)274111 SUITE 75O PA;SIMU.6(661)294 0134 VALENCIA,CM00RNIA9i 34,5 uuwJumangPatlkcnfl FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET to; PROM Janice Regnokis,City Oak Douglas Gravcik COMPANY DAM City of Rancho Cucamonga 4/25/2013 PM NUMRRR *COPAL NO.OP PAGPS/NC-JAWING Ctft5R, 909-477-2849/909.477-2746 2 PHONE NVMRRR; SRNDRR'$REF usstreNUMR1114 eel YOUR RRPRRUNCR NtLMRER, APN#1100-771-11 L 0 ARGENT 0 POIt REVwW CI PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY 0 PLEASE RECYCLE NOTR$tCOMMENTS: Enclosed is a Request to Appear end Be Heard Regnxling Notice of Intent to Adopt Resolution of Necessity(MN#1100-771.01/CRitrans Parcel##22601-1.2) NUM VHS PAC,UUO;wertONTAMTRIY11400 ANDJOR CANI1101WIIALINIORMA'ttON,ANU If INlNSnAO ONLYKIR11W UW(A nib LNbMtUAI M IIKtt1YTO WNOM Il nAUNRCRNG.ANY Ut1 WHCM21tOWIMNrt,OtrallyT1oN p4 Un6RWNA rum OP MIS YA(SIMP-P4 NIONIUtnUf,U YOU RRtlatT n FMiWRI,PT g011911 ORMmTMU%MJNEll tAa41101A Ottl'NUIIW Lt DY T11L8 01100414 n:OWstf AND N I1/0.Y IAn ORIGINAL.PAtSIAWlt to VA AT 1'111,45QVa NPAIPts• 2013-04-25 12:20 Eleven PS 1 » 9094772746 P 2/2 HINSON GRAVEL LE.F & ADAIR LLP LAWYERS A REGISTERED LIMITED LUOILJTY PARTNERSHIP • DOUGLAS A.GRAVELLE TELEPHONE(661)234-0111 t)Ow D141(6611 3E4.0116 FACSIMILE(661)394.0134 tmmclkeh(n,unpadlccom wi.hinanpmlh,com Via Fax (909-477-2849 and 909-477-2746) April 25,2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 Ann:Janice C.Reynolds. City Clerk Re Request to Appear and Be Heard Regarding Notice of Intent to Adopt Resolution of Necessity APN#1100-771-01/Caltrans Parcel##22601-1,2 Dear Ms. Reynolds: We represent Tesoro Refining&Marketing Co.LLC and Tesoro Sierra Properties,LLC (individually and collectively'Tesoro"),and are sending this letter on behalf of Tesoro. In response to your April 10,2013 letter to Tesoro regarding the above-referenced matter, please be advised Tesoro hereby requests an opportunity to appear and be beard at the May 1.2013 hearing on the above matter. Respectfully, 44— --- Douglas Gravelle DACJhs cc: Tesoro 28470 AVENUE STANFORD.SUITE 350.VALEN{:U,CALIFORNIA 91355 P426 RESOLUTION NO. 13-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7211 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 0227-693-51, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal corporation, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Section 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to exercise its respective powers of eminent domain to acquire the property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution, under a joint powers agreement entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana on February 26, 2013, pursuant to Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California and Sections 12, and California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.140(a) and (b). Because Interstate 15, where it intersects with Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and with Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is a State Highway, the California Transportation Commission ("CTC") is the body authorized to consider the adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity. On March 29, 2013, the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans") authorized the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to conduct a hearing on the Resolution of Necessity and to adopt the Resolution of Necessity by a 4/5ths vote of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council. The property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution that the City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire are for a public use, namely to alleviate existing and future traffic congestion at on-ramps and off-ramps during peak morning and evening hours within the proposed Project limits, to accommodate current and future automobile and truck traffic, and to alleviate unsatisfactory conditions associated with the existing Interchange configuration at the Interstate 15 Interchange at Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and at Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana ("proposed Project"), and for all purposes necessary and convenient thereto in connection with the proposed Project pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19; California Government Code Sections 6500, 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010, et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including, but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.130, 1240.140 (a) and (b), 1240.250, 1240.350, 1240.410, 1240.420, 1240.510, 1240.530, 1240.610, 1240.640, 1240.650; Streets and Highways Code Sections 102, 114 and 130, and other provisions of the law. Gamero Resolution No. 13-048 - Page 1 of 7 P427 Section 3. The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire abutter's rights including air, light and view, and abutter's access rights from the real property commonly known as 7211 Acorn Place, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number 0227-693-51 in connection with the proposed Project ("Subject Property Interests.") The legal descriptions of the Subject Property Interests are attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" to this Resolution of Necessity. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated herein by this reference. The real property has a gross land area of 9,004 square feet and is irregular in shape. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be physically impacted by the proposed acquisition because no land or improvements will be acquired as part of the proposed Project. Section 4. The proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests are for a public purpose, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound diamond ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The primary operational deficiency associated with the existing interchange is caused by the interchange's geometric constraints and inadequate capacity. The intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue bisecting the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramp intersections results in a large queue of vehicles on Base Line Road. Due to short separations between the three intersections and delays caused by many signal phases, especially for left turn movements to the Interstate 15 ramps for Westbound traffic in the morning peak hours and Eastbound traffic in the evening peak hours, there is heavy queuing on Base Line Road. The queuing on Base Line Road during these peak hours, results in heavy queuing on the exit ramps, which includes heavy queuing for the Northbound exit ramp in the evening peak hours and for the Southbound exit ramp in the morning peak hours. The queuing at the exit ramps during the peak hours also leads to traffic backing up on the Interstate 15 mainline. Alternatives Considered for the proposed Project The City of Rancho Cucamonga analyzed the relative effectiveness of three proposed project alternatives and a no-build alternative, to accommodate forecasted year 2030 traffic at the Interchange. Alternative 1, the no-build alternative showed that if there were no improvements made to the Interchange, the levels of service for traffic circulation in 2030 would be LOS "F," which is the worst possible level of service, and there would be a substantial increase in traffic accidents. Alternative 3, the cloverleaf, proposed the construction of two cloverleafs, one Gamero Resolution No. 13-048 - Page 2 of 7 P428 cloverleaf would be located in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange and the other cloverleaf would be located in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. Alternative 3 was not considered a viable alternative because not only did it have significant design and operational issues, it would have required the acquisition of right-of-way in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange. The acquisition of the right-of-way in the northeast quadrant would have resulted in significant impacts to current and future planned residential and commercial development. Alternative 2, partial cloverleaf, and Alternative 4, preferred alternative, were both considered as proposed projects. They had similar design features except for the following modifications to Alternative 4: • Base Line Road would be widened slightly more on the southerly side; • The Northbound Loop entrance ramp would be replaced by Eastbound dual left turn lanes to the Northbound Interstate 15 freeway; • The Diamond entrance ramp would be widened to receive dual left turns from Eastbound Base Line Road left lanes; The Northbound exit ramp that utilizes existing East Avenue undercrossing bridge would need to be widened to accommodate the two lane exit; and • Two new bridges and one widened bridge would be required to be constructed. Alternative 4 was developed and selected as the preferred alternative for the Proposed Project because it met the purpose and need for the Interchange improvements and it eliminated the need for the acquisition of commercial buildings and the acquisition and relocation of fourteen (14) businesses in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. General Plan and Specific Plan Compliance Base Line Road is currently a four-lane roadway within the proposed Project limits. Because of recent and future planned housing, retail and commercial developments in the cities, improvements to Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 Interchange are necessary to accommodate population growth and the resulting increase in traffic demands. The Cities of Rancho Cucamonga's and Fontana's Circulation Elements of their respective General Plans specify that Base Line Road is intended to be a six to eight lane major highway or arterial within the proposed Project limits, and is intended to provide efficient high volume traffic flow within their Cities and the region. The proposed Project conforms to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Circulation Elements of its General Plan, General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require that Base Line Road be a six-lane Major Divided Highway within the proposed Project limits. Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently improved with four lanes within the proposed Project limits. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan specifies that six lanes within the proposed Project limits are sufficient to meet local and regional circulations needs for future growth. The proposed Project also conforms to the City of Fontana's Circulation Elements of its General Plan and West End Specific Plan, which identifies Baseline Avenue as a major east-west highway, which can accommodate six to eight lanes of travel and allowing for raised medians. Gamero Resolution No. 13-048 - Page 3 of 7 P429 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is currently improved with six lanes from Citrus Avenue to Interstate 15. The City of Fontana's General Plan specifies that within the proposed Project limits, it is recommended that arterial segments that are located between freeway ramps and the next parallel facility, on either side of the freeway, such as Baseline Avenue at Interstate 15, be planned with an additional lane in each direction beyond its designated functional classification. These lanes will function as "auxiliary lanes" for more freeway access capacity and more efficient traffic flow between the ramps and the adjacent intersections and can serve as dedicated right turn lanes at the next intersection. Section 5. As a proposed discretionary action by a local agency, the proposed Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. ("CEQA.") Further, because the proposed Project will be partially funded by the Federal Government, it is subject to the National Environmental Policy Act NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c) ("NEPA.") Accordingly, the proposed Project was subject to both federal and state environmental review. Caltrans was the designated lead agency under the current Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") and Caltrans' stewardship program. Therefore, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 327, Caltrans was tasked with being the lead agency for CEQA and NEPA compliance and for providing full over-sight on the planning, design and right-of-way acquisition for the proposed Project. As the lead agency for the proposed Project, Caltrans commissioned the preparation of an Initial Study along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") as required under CEQA, and an Environmental Assessment along with Finding of No Significant Impacts ("EA/FONSI") as required under NEPA. Caltrans studied and analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project to identify potentially significant impacts to the environment and to identify the most feasible alternative that would accomplish the basic project objectives while lessening or eliminating any potentially significant project impacts to the environment. Pursuant to the requirements under CEQA and NEPA, checklists were utilized in order to identify physical, biological, social and economic factors that might be affected by the proposed Project. In many cases, background studies performed in connection with the proposed Project indicated no impacts under CEQA and NEPA. The following factors were identified as having less than significant impact and were studied further for the purposes of the proposed Project: Visual/Aesthetics Review, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, Air Quality, NPDES/Water Quality, and Noise. Visual/Aesthetics Review For visual and aesthetics' review, compliance with CEQA requires, at a minimum, that a Scenic Resource Evaluation be conducted. Under NEPA, a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) is required to assess visual impacts of the proposed Project. A VIA, dated February 2011, was prepared as part of the proposed Project to satisfy the requirements of both CEQA and NEPA. The VIA assessed the potential visual impacts and analyzed any potential changes of views of or from Interstate 15 and Base Line Road by the proposed Project. Gamero Resolution No. 13-048 - Page 4 of 7 P430 After performing extensive study and review, the VIA discussed the impacts of the proposed alternatives and made recommendations that certain measures be implemented in order to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse visual impacts. The measures recommended in the VIA have been considered as part of the design and construction of the proposed Project. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials An Initial Site Assessment (ISA) dated March 2007 along with a Supplemental Initial Site Assessment dated March 2011 (SISA) were prepared in order to assess the potential for hazardous waste and materials as part of the proposed Project. After having performed assessments, further study and multiple testing to determine the nature and extent of the potential for hazardous waste and materials within the proposed Project limits, certain handling recommendations were made in order to address Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) and asbestos containing materials (AGMs). In addition, a Limited Site Investigation was conducted to test for herbicides, pesticides, and metals associated with the applications of herbicides and pesticides during the operation of a former nursery within the proposed Project limits, there were no recommendations for further investigations of this former agricultural site. Air Quality and NPDES/Water Quality An Air Quality Analysis, dated February 2011, was prepared to review potential air quality issues associated with the proposed Project, and a storm water data report was prepared and approved by Caltrans on June 1, 2011 to consider water quality impacts of the proposed Project. Based on the findings of the analysis and report, no mitigation measures were needed for Air Quality and NPDES/water quality impacts as part of the proposed Project. Noise A Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) was prepared and approved on both March 4, 2011 and March 8, 2011. Based on the NADR, when compared with Alternative 1-no build alternative, the noise levels of Alternatives 2 and 4 were expected to only increase by no more than 3dBA. Therefore, this increase in noise would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, sound barriers were not recommended for Alternative 4 under CEQA and NEPA standards. However, Caltrans requested, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga committed to the construction of a sound barrier (SB No. 4) at a height of approximately 14 feet adjacent to the off-ramp in the Northwest quadrant of the Interchange within the proposed Project limits. The purpose of which was to address potential noise impacts to the residences in the adjacent subdivision associated with the new location of the off-ramp in the northwest quadrant of the Interchange. Additional NEPA Requirements In addition to the above matters, NEPA also required consideration of Title VI, Independent Utility/Logical Termini and Environmental Justice. Gamero Resolution No. 13-048 - Page 5 of 7 P431 Mitigation Requirements under CEQA and NEPA The proposed Project would have no significantly adverse effect on natural communities or wetlands or other waters within the proposed Project limits, because the following mitigation measures were required to reduce the potential effects to insignificance: • Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board; • Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game; • United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 14; and • Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination. The Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination letter was issued by FHWA (Federal Highway Commission) on June 15, 2011. With regard to the remaining mitigation measures, there was the option of either purchasing mitigation credits from an off-site mitigation bank or participation in an in-lieu fee program; however, final determination would be made by the applicable resource agency. Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Finding of No Significant Impacts The Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Finding of No Significant Impacts along with the mitigation requirements previously identified, were approved on September 30, 2011. The Notices of Availability were distributed to federal, state, regional and local agencies, and certain elected officials and property owners and were published in the appropriate publications on September 30, 2011. There have been no challenges to the IS/MND and EA/FONSI. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The property described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto is necessary for the proposed Project; D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owners of record. Section 7. The City has complied with the notice requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. Section 8. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council on May 1, 2013, which includes the Staff Report dated May 1, Gamero Resolution No. 13-048 - Page 6 of 7 P432 2013 and all documents referenced therein, including the environmental documents referenced above, and any testimony, records, and documents produced at the hearing, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 9. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney's office and staff to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. Gamero Resolution No. 13-048 - Page 7 of 7 P433 EXHIBIT A P434 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL 22680-1 THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF A FREEWAY AND THE GRANTOR HEREBY RELEASES AND RELINQUISHES TO THE GRANTEE ANY AND ALL ABUTTER'S RIGHTS, INCLUDING ACCESS RIGHTS APPURTENANT TO GRANTOR'S REMAINING PROPERTY, OVER AND ACROSS THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 51 OF TRACT NO. 16776, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FILE IN BOOK 320, PAGES 95 THROUGH 100 OF TRACT MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTH 00 003'38" WEST 66.19 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B", ATTACHED 14ERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD83), ZONE 5, 1992.88 EPOCH. DIVIDE ALL DISTANCES BY 0.99992483 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. _ AND F c� XICOTEN CATL o J E. A XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 SALAZAR LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 NO, 5507 EXP. 9-30-14 ST �P .9T O�� F OF c Av\F 08- SBd - 15-PM 6.6-22680 (22680-1) P435 EXHIBIT B P436 OR J � v o a x n - U a oo a r O Z N In 10 O W ¢ w < �rn U LA) ao a o o r���rM,,ZZ,t0.0T0�Nv T.��7 N U ZX X fI �!11AY ILJ V V 3 N �S X w �P� Z ��� 1 * o O H Ln a � w U M w Ln Ln D m CO JQ z H U w [0 w ° z = J I J w Z 1 Li m Li d U (n Li O a U r U d. Q ui _ 00 rn J U - p 1 rn -j Z: m rn w va \ Y ¢ < co 1 -,o( n a J m w i fl m U a II < d O a d d 1 li M„8£,£O.00N 1 tt'09 ------------ ----------------------1 ,6l'99 Z8'SLZ M„8£,£O.00N 1 1 , I rnl I d) ' NI 1 6'V1 I11 cr-, 1° n In F- ' W 1 F- F- i O J � a 1 W 1 ' 1 n -_ Ln O m i In Z ON uM C� J < m H � i P437 RESOLUTION NO. 13-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7231 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 0227-693-53, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal corporation, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Section 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to exercise its respective powers of eminent domain to acquire the property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution, under a joint powers agreement entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana on February 26, 2013, pursuant to Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California and Sections 12, and California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.140(a) and (b). Because Interstate 15, where it intersects with Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and with Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is a State Highway, the California Transportation Commission ("CTC") is the body authorized to consider the adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity. On March 29, 2013, the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans") authorized the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to conduct a hearing on the Resolution of Necessity and to adopt the Resolution of Necessity by a 4/5ths vote of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council. The property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution that the City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire are for a public use, namely to alleviate existing and future traffic congestion at on-ramps and off-ramps during peak morning and evening hours within the proposed Project limits, to accommodate current and future automobile and truck traffic, and to alleviate unsatisfactory conditions associated with the existing Interchange configuration at the Interstate 15 Interchange at Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and at Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana ("proposed Project"), and for all purposes necessary and convenient thereto in connection with the proposed Project pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19; California Government Code Sections 6500, 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010, et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including, but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.130, 1240.140 (a) and (b), 1240.250, 1240.350, 1240.410, 1240.420, 1240.510, 1240.530, 1240.610, 1240.640, 1240.650; Streets and Highways Code Sections 102, 114 and 130, and other provisions of the law. Landino Resolution No. 13-049 - Page 1 of 7 P438 Section 3. The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire abutter's rights which include air, light and view and abutter's access rights from the real property commonly known as 7231 Acorn Place, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number 0227-693-53 in connection with the proposed Project ("Subject Property Interests.") The legal descriptions of the Subject Property Interests are attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" to this Resolution of Necessity. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated herein by this reference. The real property has a gross land area of 11,477 square feet and is irregular in shape. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be physically impacted by the proposed acquisition because no land or improvements will be acquired as part of the proposed Project. Section 4. The proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests are for a public purpose, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound diamond ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The primary operational deficiency associated with the existing interchange is caused by the interchange's geometric constraints and inadequate capacity. The intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue bisecting the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramp intersections results in a large queue of vehicles on Base Line Road. Due to short separations between the three intersections and delays caused by many signal phases, especially for left turn movements to the Interstate 15 ramps for Westbound traffic in the morning peak hours and Eastbound traffic in the evening peak hours, there is heavy queuing on Base Line Road. The queuing on Base Line Road during these peak hours, results in heavy queuing on the exit ramps, which includes heavy queuing for the Northbound exit ramp in the evening peak hours and for the Southbound exit ramp in the morning peak hours. The queuing at the exit ramps during the peak hours also leads to traffic backing up on the Interstate 15 mainline. Alternatives Considered for the proposed Proiect The City of Rancho Cucamonga analyzed the relative effectiveness of three proposed project alternatives and a no-build alternative, to accommodate forecasted year 2030 traffic at the Interchange. Alternative 1, the no-build alternative showed that if there were no improvements made to the Interchange, the levels of service for traffic circulation in 2030 would be LOS "F," which is the worst possible level of service, and there would be a substantial increase in traffic accidents. Alternative 3, the cloverleaf, proposed the construction of two cloverleafs, one Landino Resolution No. 13-049 - Page 2 of 7 P439 cloverleaf would be located in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange and the other cloverleaf would be located in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. Alternative 3 was not considered a viable alternative because not only did it have significant design and operational issues, it would have required the acquisition of right-of-way in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange. The acquisition of the right-of-way in the northeast quadrant would have resulted in significant impacts to current and future planned residential and commercial development. Alternative 2, partial cloverleaf, and Alternative 4, preferred alternative, were both considered as proposed projects. They had similar design features except for the following modifications to Alternative 4: Base Line Road would be widened slightly more on the southerly side; • The Northbound Loop entrance ramp would be replaced by Eastbound dual left turn lanes to the Northbound Interstate 15 freeway; The Diamond entrance ramp would be widened to receive dual left turns from Eastbound Base Line Road left lanes; The Northbound exit ramp that utilizes existing East Avenue undercrossing bridge would need to be widened to accommodate the two lane exit; and • Two new bridges and one widened bridge would be required to be constructed. Alternative 4 was developed and selected as the preferred alternative for the Proposed Project because it met the purpose and need for the Interchange improvements and it eliminated the need for the acquisition of commercial buildings and the acquisition and relocation of fourteen (14) businesses in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. General Plan and Specific Plan Compliance Base Line Road is currently a four-lane roadway within the proposed Project limits. Because of recent and future planned housing, retail and commercial developments in the cities, improvements to Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 Interchange are necessary to accommodate population growth and the resulting increase in traffic demands. The Cities of Rancho Cucamonga's and Fontana's Circulation Elements of their respective General Plans specify that Base Line Road is intended to be a six to eight lane major highway or arterial within the proposed Project limits, and is intended to provide efficient high volume traffic flow within their Cities and the region. The proposed Project conforms to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Circulation Elements of its General Plan, General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require that Base Line Road be a six-lane Major Divided Highway within the proposed Project limits. Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently improved with four lanes within the proposed Project limits. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan specifies that six lanes within the proposed Project limits are sufficient to meet local and regional circulations needs for future growth. The proposed Project also conforms to the City of Fontana's Circulation Elements of its General Plan and West End Specific Plan, which identifies Baseline Avenue as a major east-west highway, which can accommodate six to eight lanes of travel and allowing for raised medians. Landino Resolution No. 13-049 - Page 3 of 7 P440 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is currently improved with six lanes from Citrus Avenue to Interstate 15. The City of Fontana's General Plan specifies that within the proposed Project limits, it is recommended that arterial segments that are located between freeway ramps and the next parallel facility, on either side of the freeway, such as Baseline Avenue at Interstate 15, be planned with an additional lane in each direction beyond its designated functional classification. These lanes will function as "auxiliary lanes" for more freeway access capacity and more efficient traffic flow between the ramps and the adjacent intersections and can serve as dedicated right turn lanes at the next intersection. Section 5. As a proposed discretionary action by a local agency, the proposed Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. ("CEQA.") Further, because the proposed Project will be partially funded by the Federal Government, it is subject to the National Environmental Policy Act NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c) ("NEPA.") Accordingly, the proposed Project was subject to both federal and state environmental review. Caltrans was the designated lead agency under the current Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") and Caltrans' stewardship program. Therefore, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 327, Caltrans was tasked with being the lead agency for CEQA and NEPA compliance and for providing full over-sight on the planning, design and right-of-way acquisition for the proposed Project. As the lead agency for the proposed Project, Caltrans commissioned the preparation of an Initial Study along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") as required under CEQA, and an Environmental Assessment along with Finding of No Significant Impacts ("EA/FONSI") as required under NEPA. Caltrans studied and analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project to identify potentially significant impacts to the environment and to identify the most feasible alternative that would accomplish the basic project objectives while lessening or eliminating any potentially significant project impacts to the environment. Pursuant to the requirements under CEQA and NEPA, checklists were utilized in order to identify physical, biological, social and economic factors that might be affected by the proposed Project. In many cases, background studies performed in connection with the proposed Project indicated no impacts under CEQA and NEPA. The following factors were identified as having less than significant impact and were studied further for the purposes of the proposed Project: Visual/Aesthetics Review, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, Air Quality, NPDES/Water Quality, and Noise. Visual/Aesthetics Review For visual and aesthetics' review, compliance with CEQA requires, at a minimum, that a Scenic Resource Evaluation be conducted. Under NEPA, a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) is required to assess visual impacts of the proposed Project. A VIA, dated February 2011, was prepared as part of the proposed Project to satisfy the requirements of both CEQA and NEPA. The VIA assessed the potential visual impacts and analyzed any potential changes of views of or from Interstate 15 and Base Line Road by the proposed Project. Landino Resolution No. 13-049 - Page 4 of 7 P441 After performing extensive study and review, the VIA discussed the impacts of the proposed alternatives and made recommendations that certain measures be implemented in order to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse visual impacts. The measures recommended in the VIA have been considered as part of the design and construction of the proposed Project. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials An Initial Site Assessment (ISA) dated March 2007 along with a Supplemental Initial Site Assessment dated March 2011 (SISA) were prepared in order to assess the potential for hazardous waste and materials as part of the proposed Project. After having performed assessments, further study and multiple testing to determine the nature and extent of the potential for hazardous waste and materials within the proposed Project limits, certain handling recommendations were made in order to address Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) and asbestos containing materials (AGMs). In addition, a Limited Site Investigation was conducted to test for herbicides, pesticides, and metals associated with the applications of herbicides and pesticides during the operation of a former nursery within the proposed Project limits, there were no recommendations for further investigations of this former agricultural site. Air Quality and NPDES/Water Quality An Air Quality Analysis, dated February 2011, was prepared to review potential air quality issues associated with the proposed Project, and a storm water data report was prepared and approved by Caltrans on June 1, 2011 to consider water quality impacts of the proposed Project. Based on the findings of the analysis and report, no mitigation measures were needed for Air Quality and NPDES/water quality impacts as part of the proposed Project. Noise A Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) was prepared and approved on both March 4, 2011 and March 8, 2011. Based on the NADR, when compared with Alternative 1-no build alternative, the noise levels of Alternatives 2 and 4 were expected to only increase by no more than 3dBA. Therefore, this increase in noise would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, sound barriers were not recommended for Alternative 4 under CEQA and NEPA standards. However, Caltrans requested, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga committed to the construction of a sound barrier (SB No. 4) at a height of approximately 14 feet adjacent to the off-ramp in the Northwest quadrant of the Interchange within the proposed Project limits. The purpose of which was to address potential noise impacts to the residences in the adjacent subdivision associated with the new location of the off-ramp in the northwest quadrant of the Interchange. Additional NEPA Requirements In addition to the above matters, NEPA also required consideration of Title VI, Independent Utility/Logical Termini and Environmental Justice. Landino Resolution No. 13-049 - Page 5 of 7 P442 Mitigation Requirements under CEQA and NEPA The proposed Project would have no significantly adverse effect on natural communities or wetlands or other waters within the proposed Project limits, because the following mitigation measures were required to reduce the potential effects to insignificance: • Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board; • Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game; • United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 14; and • Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination. The Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination letter was issued by FHWA (Federal Highway Commission) on June 15, 2011. With regard to the remaining mitigation measures, there was the option of either purchasing mitigation credits from an off-site mitigation bank or participation in an in-lieu fee program; however, final determination would be made by the applicable resource agency. Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Finding of No Significant Impacts The Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Finding of No Significant Impacts along with the mitigation requirements previously identified, were approved on September 30, 2011. The Notices of Availability were distributed to federal, state, regional and local agencies, and certain elected officials and property owners and were published in the appropriate publications on September 30, 2011. There have been no challenges to the IS/MND and EA/FONSI. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The property described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto is necessary for the proposed Project; D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owners of record. Section 7. The City has complied with the notice requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. Section 8. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council on May 1, 2013, which includes the Staff Report dated May 1, Landino Resolution No. 13-049 - Page 6 of 7 P443 2013 and all documents referenced therein, including the environmental documents referenced above, and any testimony, records, and documents produced at the hearing, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 9. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney's office and staff to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. Landino Resolution No. 13-049 - Page 7 of 7 P444 EXHIBIT A P445 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL 22682-1 THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF A FREEWAY AND THE GRANTOR HEREBY RELEASES AND RELINQUISHES TO THE GRANTEE ANY AND ALL ABUTTER'S RIGHTS, INCLUDING ACCESS RIGHTS APPURTENANT TO GRANTOR'S REMAINING PROPERTY, OVER AND ACROSS THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 53 OF TRACT NO. 16776, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FILE IN BOOK 320, PAGES 95 THROUGH 100 OF TRACT MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTH 00 003'38" WEST 132.17 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD83), ZONE 5, 1992.88 EPOCH. DIVIDE ALL DISTANCES BY 0.99992483 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. V XICOTENCATL�� E. A XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 SALAZAR LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 NO. 5507 EXP. 9-30-14 9re OF C Ao\ o 08- SBd - 15-PM 6.6- 22682 (22682-1) P446 EXHIBIT B P447 OR F- f- a p Q j v U Q oo Q a Z N a�S WX LiJNPV eo M„ZZ,b0.00N p a d o ZN w ZfINJAV LE VZ z ��� S o O Lo d w U "-) M w m m J ro c Q Z F- CO J O Z x CD w Z m J U � O v o U U Q O _ 00 rn U °' JOZ (D 0)W tea \ j Y ue Qrn I n a m f W :2 v a II < 4 Q , a M„8£,20.00N wow --T--------------------- --- ---------------- - LI'Z£l S�'LL M„8F,£O.00N rm o rn1 q I a Ln d ` O N r'7 N W tn ; 0) Ln It \ F ` W O F N O Q m O> L CD O L7JV7d N900V o < M P448 RESOLUTION NO. 13-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7201 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 0227-693-50, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal corporation, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Section 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to exercise its respective powers of eminent domain to acquire the property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution, under a joint powers agreement entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana on February 26, 2013, pursuant to Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California and Sections 12, and California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.140(a) and (b). Because Interstate 15, where it intersects with Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and with Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is a State Highway, the California Transportation Commission ("CTC") is the body authorized to consider the adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity. On March 29, 2013, the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans") authorized the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to conduct a hearing on the Resolution of Necessity and to adopt the Resolution of Necessity by a 4/5ths vote of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council. The property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution that the City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire are for a public use, namely to alleviate existing and future traffic congestion at on-ramps and off-ramps during peak morning and evening hours within the proposed Project limits, to accommodate current and future automobile and truck traffic, and to alleviate unsatisfactory conditions associated with the existing Interchange configuration at the Interstate 15 Interchange at Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and at Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana ("proposed Project"), and for all purposes necessary and convenient thereto in connection with the proposed Project pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19; California Government Code Sections 6500, 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010, et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including, but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.130, 1240.140 (a) and (b), 1240.250, 1240.350, 1240.410, 1240.420, 1240.510, 1240.530, 1240.610, 1240.640, 1240.650; Streets and Highways Code Sections 102, 114 and 130, and other provisions of the law. Bhatti Resolution No. 13-050 - Page 1 of 7 P449 Section 3. The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire abutter's rights of air, light and view, and abutter's access rights from the real property commonly known as 7201 Acorn Place, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number 0227-693-50 in connection with the proposed Project ("Subject Property Interests.") The legal descriptions of the Subject Property Interests are attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" to this Resolution of Necessity. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated herein by this reference. The real property has a gross land area of 9,221 square feet and is rectangular in shape. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be physically impacted by the proposed acquisition because no land or improvements will be acquired as part of the proposed Project. Section 4. The proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests are for a public purpose, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound diamond ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The primary operational deficiency associated with the existing interchange is caused by the interchange's geometric constraints and inadequate capacity. The intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue bisecting the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramp intersections results in a large queue of vehicles on Base Line Road. Due to short separations between the three intersections and delays caused by many signal phases, especially for left turn movements to the Interstate 15 ramps for Westbound traffic in the morning peak hours and Eastbound traffic in the evening peak hours, there is heavy queuing on Base Line Road. The queuing on Base Line Road during these peak hours, results in heavy queuing on the exit ramps, which includes heavy queuing for the Northbound exit ramp in the evening peak hours and for the Southbound exit ramp in the morning peak hours. The queuing at the exit ramps during the peak hours also leads to traffic backing up on the Interstate 15 mainline. Alternatives Considered for the proposed Proiect The City of Rancho Cucamonga analyzed the relative effectiveness of three proposed project alternatives and a no-build alternative, to accommodate forecasted year 2030 traffic at the Interchange. Alternative 1, the no-build alternative showed that if there were no improvements made to the Interchange, the levels of service for traffic circulation in 2030 would be LOS "F," which is the worst possible level of service, and there would be a substantial increase in traffic accidents. Alternative 3, the cloverleaf, proposed the construction of two cloverleafs, one Bhatti Resolution No. 13-050 - Page 2 of 7 P450 cloverleaf would be located in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange and the other cloverleaf would be located in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. Alternative 3 was not considered a viable alternative because not only did it have significant design and operational issues, it would have required the acquisition of right-of-way in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange. The acquisition of the right-of-way in the northeast quadrant would have resulted in significant impacts to current and future planned residential and commercial development. Alternative 2, partial cloverleaf, and Alternative 4, preferred alternative, were both considered as proposed projects. They had similar design features except for the following modifications to Alternative 4: • Base Line Road would be widened slightly more on the southerly side; The Northbound Loop entrance ramp would be replaced by Eastbound dual left turn lanes to the Northbound Interstate 15 freeway; • The Diamond entrance ramp would be widened to receive dual left turns from Eastbound Base Line Road left lanes; • The Northbound exit ramp that utilizes existing East Avenue undercrossing bridge would need to be widened to accommodate the two lane exit; and • Two new bridges and one widened bridge would be required to be constructed. Alternative 4 was developed and selected as the preferred alternative for the Proposed Project because it met the purpose and need for the Interchange improvements and it eliminated the need for the acquisition of commercial buildings and the acquisition and relocation of fourteen (14) businesses in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. General Plan and Specific Plan Compliance Base Line Road is currently a four-lane roadway within the proposed Project limits. Because of recent and future planned housing, retail and commercial developments in the cities, improvements to Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 Interchange are necessary to accommodate population growth and the resulting increase in traffic demands. The Cities of Rancho Cucamonga's and Fontana's Circulation Elements of their respective General Plans specify that Base Line Road is intended to be a six to eight lane major highway or arterial within the proposed Project limits, and is intended to provide efficient high volume traffic flow within their Cities and the region. The proposed Project conforms to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Circulation Elements of its General Plan, General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require that Base Line Road be a six-lane Major Divided Highway within the proposed Project limits. Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently improved with four lanes within the proposed Project limits. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan specifies that six lanes within the proposed Project limits are sufficient to meet local and regional circulations needs for future growth. The proposed Project also conforms to the City of Fontana's Circulation Elements of its General Plan and West End Specific Plan, which identifies Baseline Avenue as a major east-west highway, which can accommodate six to eight lanes of travel and allowing for raised medians. Bhatti Resolution No. 13-050 - Page 3 of 7 P451 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is currently improved with six lanes from Citrus Avenue to Interstate 15. The City of Fontana's General Plan specifies that within the proposed Project limits, it is recommended that arterial segments that are located between freeway ramps and the next parallel facility, on either side of the freeway, such as Baseline Avenue at Interstate 15, be planned with an additional lane in each direction beyond its designated functional classification. These lanes will function as "auxiliary lanes" for more freeway access capacity and more efficient traffic flow between the ramps and the adjacent intersections and can serve as dedicated right turn lanes at the next intersection. Section 5. As a proposed discretionary action by a local agency, the proposed Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. ("CEQA.") Further, because the proposed Project will be partially funded by the Federal Government, it is subject to the National Environmental Policy Act NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c) ("NEPA.") Accordingly, the proposed Project was subject to both federal and state environmental review. Caltrans was the designated lead agency under the current Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") and Caltrans' stewardship program. Therefore, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 327, Caltrans was tasked with being the lead agency for CEQA and NEPA compliance and for providing full over-sight on the planning, design and right-of-way acquisition for the proposed Project. As the lead agency for the proposed Project, Caltrans commissioned the preparation of an Initial Study along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") as required under CEQA, and an Environmental Assessment along with Finding of No Significant Impacts ("EA/FONSI") as required under NEPA. Caltrans studied and analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project to identify potentially significant impacts to the environment and to identify the most feasible alternative that would accomplish the basic project objectives while lessening or eliminating any potentially significant project impacts to the environment. Pursuant to the requirements under CEQA and NEPA, checklists were utilized in order to identify physical, biological, social and economic factors that might be affected by the proposed Project. In many cases, background studies performed in connection with the proposed Project indicated no impacts under CEQA and NEPA. The following factors were identified as having less than significant impact and were studied further for the purposes of the proposed Project: Visual/Aesthetics Review, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, Air Quality, NPDES/Water Quality, and Noise. Visual/Aesthetics Review For visual and aesthetics' review, compliance with CEQA requires, at a minimum, that a Scenic Resource Evaluation be conducted. Under NEPA, a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) is required to assess visual impacts of the proposed Project. A VIA, dated February 2011, was prepared as part of the proposed Project to satisfy the requirements of both CEQA and NEPA. The VIA assessed the potential visual impacts and analyzed any potential changes of views of or from Interstate 15 and Base Line Road by the proposed Project. Bhatti Resolution No. 13-050 - Page 4 of 7 P452 After performing extensive study and review, the VIA discussed the impacts of the proposed alternatives and made recommendations that certain measures be implemented in order to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse visual impacts. The measures recommended in the VIA have been considered as part of the design and construction of the proposed Project. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials An Initial Site Assessment (ISA) dated March 2007 along with a Supplemental Initial Site Assessment dated March 2011 (SISA) were prepared in order to assess the potential for hazardous waste and materials as part of the proposed Project. After having performed assessments, further study and multiple testing to determine the nature and extent of the potential for hazardous waste and materials within the proposed Project limits, certain handling recommendations were made in order to address Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) and asbestos containing materials (AGMs). In addition, a Limited Site Investigation was conducted to test for herbicides, pesticides, and metals associated with the applications of herbicides and pesticides during the operation of a former nursery within the proposed Project limits, there were no recommendations for further investigations of this former agricultural site. Air Quality and NPDES/Water Quality An Air Quality Analysis, dated February 2011, was prepared to review potential air quality issues associated with the proposed Project, and a storm water data report was prepared and approved by Caltrans on June 1, 2011 to consider water quality impacts of the proposed Project. Based on the findings of the analysis and report, no mitigation measures were needed for Air Quality and NPDES/water quality impacts as part of the proposed Project. Noise A Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) was prepared and approved on both March 4, 2011 and March 8, 2011. Based on the NADIR, when compared with Alternative 1-no build alternative, the noise levels of Alternatives 2 and 4 were expected to only increase by no more than 3dBA. Therefore, this increase in noise would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, sound barriers were not recommended for Alternative 4 under CEQA and NEPA standards. However, Caltrans requested, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga committed to the construction of a sound barrier (SB No. 4) at a height of approximately 14 feet adjacent to the off-ramp in the Northwest quadrant of the Interchange within the proposed Project limits. The purpose of which was to address potential noise impacts to the residences in the adjacent subdivision associated with the new location of the off-ramp in the northwest quadrant of the Interchange. Additional NEPA Requirements In addition to the above matters, NEPA also required consideration of Title VI, Independent Utility/Logical Termini and Environmental Justice. Bhatti Resolution No. 13-050 - Page 5 of 7 P453 Mitigation Requirements under CEQA and NEPA The proposed Project would have no significantly adverse effect on natural communities or wetlands or other waters within the proposed Project limits, because the following mitigation measures were required to reduce the potential effects to insignificance: • Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board; • Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game; • United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 14; and • Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination. The Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination letter was issued by FHWA (Federal Highway Commission) on June 15, 2011. With regard to the remaining mitigation measures, there was the option of either purchasing mitigation credits from an off-site mitigation bank or participation in an in-lieu fee program; however, final determination would be made by the applicable resource agency. Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Finding of No Significant Impacts The Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Finding of No Significant Impacts along with the mitigation requirements previously identified, were approved on September 30, 2011. The Notices of Availability were distributed to federal, state, regional and local agencies, and certain elected officials and property owners and were published in the appropriate publications on September 30, 2011. There have been no challenges to the IS/MND and EA/FONSI. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The property described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto is necessary for the proposed Project; D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owners of record. Section 7. The City has complied with the notice requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. Section S. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council on May 1, 2013, which includes the Staff Report dated May 1, Matti Resolution No. 13-050 - Page 6 of 7 P454 2013 and all documents referenced therein, including the environmental documents referenced above, and any testimony, records, and documents produced at the hearing, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 9. The .City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney's office and staff to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. Bhatti Resolution No. 13-050 - Page 7 of 7 P455 EXHIBIT A P456 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL 22679-1 THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF A FREEWAY AND THE GRANTOR HEREBY RELEASES AND RELINQUISHES TO THE GRANTEE ANY AND ALL ABUTTER'S RIGHTS, INCLUDING ACCESS RIGHTS APPURTENANT TO GRANTOR'S REMAINING PROPERTY, OVER AND ACROSS THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 50 OF TRACT NO. 16776, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FILE IN BOOK 320, PAGES 95 THROUGH 100 OF TRACT MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTH 00 003'38" WEST 65.81 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD83),ZONE 5, 1992.88 EPOCH. DIVIDE ALL DISTANCES BY 0.99992483 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. O LAND S C�XICOTENCATL J E. A SALAZAR XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 NO. 5507 LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 l EXP. 9-30-14 P 9Te OF CF \EDQ�' 08- SBd - 15-PM 6.6-22679 (22679-1) P457 EXHIBIT B P458 OR O Q 0� r U Q oo a Z nn 6 W W J �rn U Q d o M„ZZ,b0.00N 0 N 0 ZX N LVfIN,7Ae ssVJ co O H T) a. � w U � C/) io W `n D m CO J °O = Q z H CD CO J J uj o� z _' I � W Z J m ui U N O o U U Q �ci O � n O> J U w U) U') I � d O � d i M„92,M.00N 1 bb'09 ,l9'99 ; l0'Zb� M„9£',£'0.00N i rn1 Q Ln C ' O N% N d' I �1 w+r Z cD O ~O ° ° ° J ” a J J , T 1 � lk W O \ z O O O U 0 Q m Of O 0 L \ U-) z O 0 U NJ J of m P459 RESOLUTION NO. 13-051 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13449, 13451, and 13479 BASELINE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS.: 1107- 771-02, -03, AND -09, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal corporation, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Section 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to exercise its respective powers of eminent domain to acquire the property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution, under a joint powers agreement entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana on February 26, 2013, pursuant to Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California and Sections 12, and California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.140(a) and (b). Because Interstate 15, where it intersects with Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and with Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is a State Highway, the California Transportation Commission ("CTC") is the body authorized to consider the adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity. On March 29, 2013, the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans") authorized the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to conduct a hearing on the Resolution of Necessity and to adopt the Resolution of Necessity by a 4/5ths vote of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council. The property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution that the City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire are for a public use, namely to alleviate existing and future traffic congestion at on-ramps and off-ramps during peak morning and evening hours within the proposed Project limits, to accommodate current and future automobile and truck traffic, and to alleviate unsatisfactory conditions associated with the existing Interchange configuration at the Interstate 15 Interchange at Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and at Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana ("proposed Project"), and for all purposes necessary and convenient thereto in connection with the proposed Project pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19; California Government Code Sections 6500, 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010, et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including, but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.130, 1240.140 (a) and (b), 1240.250, 1240.350, 1240.410, 1240.420, 1240.510, 1240.530, 1240.610, 1240.640, 1240.650; Streets and Highways Code Sections 102, 114 and 130, and other provisions of the law. Pacific/Costanzo/Lewis Resolution No. 13-051 - Page 1 of 7 P460 Section 3. The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire abutter's access rights, a permanent highway easement of 5,165 square feet and a temporary construction easement of 4,388 square feet for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 13449, 13451, and 13479 Baseline Avenue, in the City of Fontana and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Numbers 1100-771-02, -03, and -09 in connection with the proposed Project ("Subject Property Interests.") The legal descriptions of the Subject Property Interests are attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" to this Resolution of Necessity. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated herein by this reference. The real property has a gross land area of 120,172 square feet and is irregular in shape. It is improved with commercial buildings and businesses, which will not be physically impacted by the proposed acquisition because no land or improvements will be acquired as part of the proposed Project. The acquisition areas are located within an area already encumbered by a landscaping easement in favor of the City of Fontana Community Facilities District and, according to the Tract Map had already conveyed access rights to the City of Fontana. Section 4. The proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests are for a public purpose, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound diamond ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The primary operational deficiency associated with the existing interchange is caused by the interchange's geometric constraints and inadequate capacity. The intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue bisecting the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramp intersections results in a large queue of vehicles on Base Line Road. Due to short separations between the three intersections and delays caused by many signal phases, especially for left turn movements to the Interstate 15 ramps for Westbound traffic in the morning peak hours and Eastbound traffic in the evening peak hours, there is heavy queuing on Base Line Road. The queuing on Base Line Road during these peak hours, results in heavy queuing on the exit ramps, which includes heavy queuing for the Northbound exit ramp in the evening peak hours and for the Southbound exit ramp in the morning peak hours. The queuing at the exit ramps during the peak hours also leads to traffic backing up on the Interstate 15 mainline. Alternatives Considered for the proposed Proiect The City of Rancho Cucamonga analyzed the relative effectiveness of three proposed project alternatives and a no-build alternative, to accommodate forecasted year 2030 traffic at the Paci&c/Costanzo/Lewis Resolution No. 13-051 - Page 2 of 7 P461 Interchange. Alternative 1, the no-build alternative showed that if there were no improvements made to the Interchange, the levels of service for traffic circulation in 2030 would be LOS "F," which is the worst possible level of service, and there would be a substantial increase in traffic accidents. Alternative 3, the cloverleaf, proposed the construction of two cloverleafs, one cloverleaf would be located in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange and the other cloverleaf would be located in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. Alternative 3 was not considered a viable alternative because not only did it have significant design and operational issues, it would have required the acquisition of right-of-way in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange. The acquisition of the right-of-way in the northeast quadrant would have resulted in significant impacts to current and future planned residential and commercial development. Alternative 2, partial cloverleaf, and Alternative 4, preferred alternative, were both considered as proposed projects. They had similar design features except for the following modifications to Alternative 4: Base Line Road would be widened slightly more on the southerly side; The Northbound Loop entrance ramp would be replaced by Eastbound dual left turn lanes to the Northbound Interstate 15 freeway; • The Diamond entrance ramp would be widened to receive dual left turns from Eastbound Base Line Road left lanes; • The Northbound exit ramp that utilizes existing East Avenue undercrossing bridge would need to be widened to accommodate the two lane exit; and Two new bridges and one widened bridge would be required to be constructed. Alternative 4 was developed and selected as the preferred alternative for the Proposed Project because it met the purpose and need for the Interchange improvements and it eliminated the need for the acquisition of commercial buildings and the acquisition and relocation of fourteen (14) businesses in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. General Plan and Specific Plan Compliance Base Line Road is currently a four-lane roadway within the proposed Project limits. Because of recent and future planned housing, retail and commercial developments in the cities, improvements to Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 Interchange are necessary to accommodate population growth and the resulting increase in traffic demands. The Cities of Rancho Cucamonga's and Fontana's Circulation Elements of their respective General Plans specify that Base Line Road is intended to be a six to eight lane major highway or arterial within the proposed Project limits, and is intended to provide efficient high volume traffic flow within their Cities and the region. The proposed Project conforms to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Circulation Elements of its General Plan, General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require that Base Line Road be a six-lane Major Divided Highway within the proposed Project limits. Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently improved with four lanes within the proposed Project limits. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan specifies that six lanes within the proposed Project limits are sufficient to meet local and regional circulations needs for future growth. Pacific/Costanzo/Lewi s Resolution No. 13-051 - Page 3 of 7 P462 The proposed Project also conforms to the City of Fontana's Circulation Elements of its General Plan and West End Specific Plan, which identifies Baseline Avenue as a major east-west highway, which can accommodate six to eight lanes of travel and allowing for raised medians. Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is currently improved with six lanes from Citrus Avenue to Interstate 15. The City of Fontana's General Plan specifies that within the proposed Project limits, it is recommended that arterial segments that are located between freeway ramps and the next parallel facility, on either side of the freeway, such as Baseline Avenue at Interstate 15, be planned with an additional lane in each direction beyond its designated functional classification. These lanes will function as "auxiliary lanes" for more freeway access capacity and more efficient traffic flow between the ramps and the adjacent intersections and can serve as dedicated right turn lanes at the next intersection. Section 5. As a proposed discretionary action by a local agency, the proposed Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. ("CEQA.") Further, because the proposed Project will be partially funded by the Federal Government, it is subject to the National Environmental Policy Act NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c) ("NEPA.") Accordingly, the proposed Project was subject to both federal and state environmental review. Caltrans was the designated lead agency under the current Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") and Caltrans' stewardship program. Therefore, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 327, Caltrans was tasked with being the lead agency for CEQA and NEPA compliance and for providing full over-sight on the planning, design and right-of-way acquisition for the proposed Project. As the lead agency for the proposed Project, Caltrans commissioned the preparation of an Initial Study along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") as required under CEQA, and an Environmental Assessment along with Finding of No Significant Impacts ("EA/FONSI") as required under NEPA. Caltrans studied and analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project to identify potentially significant impacts to the environment and to identify the most feasible alternative that would accomplish the basic project objectives while lessening or eliminating any potentially significant project impacts to the environment. Pursuant to the requirements under CEQA and NEPA, checklists were utilized in order to identify physical, biological, social and economic factors that might be affected by the proposed Project. In many cases, background studies performed in connection with the proposed Project indicated no impacts under CEQA and NEPA. The following factors were identified as having less than significant impact and were studied further for the purposes of the proposed Project: Visual/Aesthetics Review, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, Air Quality, NPDES/Water Quality, and Noise. Visual/Aesthetics Review For visual and aesthetics' review, compliance with CEQA requires, at a minimum, that a Scenic Resource Evaluation be conducted. Under NEPA, a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) is required to assess visual impacts of the proposed Project. A VIA, dated February 2011, was prepared as part of the proposed Project to satisfy the requirements of both CEQA and NEPA. Pacific/C ostanzo/Lewis Resolution No. 13-051 - Page 4 of 7 P463 The VIA assessed the potential visual impacts and analyzed any potential changes of views of or from Interstate 15 and Base Line Road by the proposed Project. After performing extensive study and review, the VIA discussed the impacts of the proposed alternatives and made recommendations that certain measures be implemented in order to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse visual impacts. The measures recommended in the VIA have been considered as part of the design and construction of the proposed Project. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials An Initial Site Assessment (ISA) dated March 2007 along with a Supplemental Initial Site Assessment dated March 2011 (SISA) were prepared in order to assess the potential for hazardous waste and materials as part of the proposed Project. After having performed assessments, further study and multiple testing to determine the nature and extent of the potential for hazardous waste and materials within the proposed Project limits, certain handling recommendations were made in order to address Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) and asbestos containing materials (ACMs). In addition, a Limited Site Investigation was conducted to test for herbicides, pesticides, and metals associated with the applications of herbicides and pesticides during the operation of a former nursery within the proposed Project limits, there were no recommendations for further investigations of this former agricultural site. Air Quality and NPDESMater Quality An Air Quality Analysis, dated February 2011, was prepared to review potential air quality issues associated with the proposed Project, and a storm water data report was prepared and approved by Caltrans on June 1, 2011 to consider water quality impacts of the proposed Project. Based on the findings of the analysis and report, no mitigation measures were needed for Air Quality and NPDES/water quality impacts as part of the proposed Project. Noise A Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) was prepared and approved on both March 4, 2011 and March 8, 2011. Based on the NADR, when compared with Alternative 1-no build alternative, the noise levels of Alternatives 2 and 4 were expected to only increase by no more than 3dBA. Therefore, this increase in noise would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, sound barriers were not recommended for Alternative 4 under CEQA and NEPA standards. However, Caltrans requested, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga committed to the construction of a sound barrier (SB No. 4) at a height of approximately 14 feet adjacent to the off-ramp in the Northwest quadrant of the Interchange within the proposed Project limits. The purpose of which was to address potential noise impacts to the residences in the adjacent subdivision associated with the new location of the off-ramp in the northwest quadrant of the Interchange. Additional NEPA Requirements In addition to the above matters, NEPA also required consideration of Title VI, Independent Utility/Logical Termini and Environmental Justice. Pacific/Costanzo/Lewis Resolution No. 13-051 - Page 5 of 7 P464 Mitiqation Requirements under CEQA and NEPA The proposed Project would have no significantly adverse effect on natural communities or wetlands or other waters within the proposed Project limits, because the following mitigation measures were required to reduce the potential effects to insignificance: • Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board; • Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game; • United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 14; and • Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination. The Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination letter was issued by FHWA (Federal Highway Commission) on June 15, 2011. With regard to the remaining mitigation measures, there was the option of either purchasing mitigation credits from an off-site mitigation bank or participation in an in-lieu fee program; however, final determination would be made by the applicable resource agency. Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Findinq of No Significant Impacts The Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Finding of No Significant Impacts along with the mitigation requirements previously identified, were approved on September 30, 2011. The Notices of Availability were distributed to federal, state, regional and local agencies, and certain elected officials and property owners and were published in the appropriate publications on September 30, 2011. There have been no challenges to the IS/MND and EA/FONSI. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The property described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto is necessary for the proposed Project; D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owners of record. Section 7. The City has complied with the notice requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. Section 8. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council on May 1, 2013, which includes the Staff Report dated May 1, Pacific/Costanzo/Lewis Resolution No. 13-051 - Page 6 of 7 P465 2013 and all documents referenced therein, including the environmental documents referenced above, and any testimony, records, and documents produced at the hearing, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 9. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney's office and staff to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. Pacific/Costanzo/Lewis Resolution No. 13-051 - Page 7 of 7 P466 EXHIBIT A P467 EXHIBIT "A" 22602-1 THOSE CERTAIN PORTIONS OF PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15412, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED IN BOOK 189, PAGES 71 THROUGH 72,OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 3; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCELS, SOUTH 89°58'57"EAST 249.44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47°01'40"EAST 39.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 058'57"EAST 6.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 00 001'03" WEST 19.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 058'57" WEST 7.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45018'2 1" WEST 39.95 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 18.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM SAID NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 89 058'57"WEST 249.08 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 00 023'25"EAST 18.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 5,165 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD IF ANY. �_A N p SGT <11& CXICOTFNCATL p E. A XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 SALA7_AR LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 N0, 5507 EXP. 9-30-14 9TF pF pAL�F�Q- P468 EXHIBIT "A" 22602-2 THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF A FREEWAY AND THE GRANTOR HEREBY RELEASES AND RELINQUISHES TO THE GRANTEE ANY AND ALL ABUTTER'S RIGHTS OF ACCESS APPURTENANT TO GRANTOR'S REMAINING PROPERTY, OVER AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO, 15412, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED IN BOOK 189, PAGES 71 THROUGH 72, OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT LOCATED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, DISTANT SOUTH 00 023'25" WEST 18.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCELS SOUTH 89 058'57" EAST 249.08 FEET. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. A N D soy U XICOTENCATL p E. p SALAZAR NO. 5507 XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 EXP. 9-30-14 P LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 F OF OA \Fo 08- SBd - 15-PM 6.8 -22602 (22602-2) P469 EXHIBIT "A" TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 22602-3 THOSE CERTAIN PORTIONS OF PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15412, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED IN BOOK 189, PAGES 71 THROUGH 72, OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT LOCATED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, DISTANT SOUTH 00 023'25" WEST 18.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCELS SOUTH 89 058'57" EAST 249.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°18'21" EAST 39.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 058'57" EAST 7.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°01'03" WEST 28.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 058'57" WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 001'03" EAST 17.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 018'21" WEST 34.73 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 33.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM SAID NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 89 058'57" WEST 249.96 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 00 023'25" EAST 15.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 4,388 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT`B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD IF ANY. \_AND SGT V XICOTENCATL o E. p SALAZAR XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 No. 07 EXP. 9-330-14 LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 f of CF FO P470 EXHIBIT B P471 OR It h Q K n 1 N " O> o U a Z N in M I 4 W W J U N0 `V Q O p O U Z X 4i OS� X wS�P 3 Z1 ggZ 3„20,10.00N O N O 00 n N 00 Z1 Z 7 CV ti 04 w I X05 �O C�) O N N a � I Nz ° N JZh � U �Q ° Cn a Lo W 00'81 w 0 � I L) a m w a 3 Q m W 00, i VUi (7i oi p W Z I N N � A co Q Z F- � Y O w C) rl _ r 3 O W Q ^ co � I, p O : ; O m N N f— :n W W tD ^ a rn N I Z U ZI w w33 Mo f z ,017'99 l j Q Ln o N �a rn 3„£O,10.00N pp CO M M Q w Y U-)p Lo" a� � 00 °O 00 0 a w 3 . (nNZZ � a � rn a ,°° Lo Q- 00 Z ,0074 4i 3„SZ,EZ.00N v 29'19£ 3„9Z,2Z.00N m mees 'M98 'su 'ts N a Z/1 3 d0 NODUOd ,712NJAV LEV,7 P472 I N OR t y Q n W �zn o U Q00 a warn < w < moo, v k1 aim J ~O Q c p w (n Za � a wS�Q�. Z l'89Z 3„£O,10.00N I 0 Lo 0 a � N a0 z coo 0� ' /J Lr) N O Z N W p W a Q a � I JZh pip W 7 U V W ,00'81 a w co W f� = J It 00 - 6� O 1n Z_ W Z I N N z a - - — — - - LLJ o N C) 31 r w N Q 00 00 M O 00 U-) N LLJ a H m Z � ^ V ZI N Mo Z � ov99 W w a m 3„£0,10.00N Caro U) N a m N o cwa L 00 0 06 < In rn z ,00'ZL 9C60 C9192 C9192 3„SZ,£Z.00N co — — — '”) mp VIV88S 'M98 'Sll '4S N a Z/1 3 30 NOLU10d co Ln P473 y OR b I h Q n l 7 O Z N N0 Q J Q W W J N� O J QQ O p N za (A OAS' X w P�� Z1'89Z 3„£O,10.00N oLO o � v ch ro Z3 91 z N J J J CD N Z O W CL 'o O 00 z n m O p I, O O d' 00 U r Z U¢ m Co. QM W 00'8l a w s 3 w w 3 w 3 3 w D � I � a , inU) V,) n ,00'££ as Ln p Ln N (V p Lo o Q r^^� 3 p O p N N O ;n O (7 r n p p D) p p p D) p m J M � 00 M Z O ap O O O N O ^I op Z Z (n (n Z N Z Z X 000 N M It LO O r m w Z N N N Z J J J J J J J J a — — Ov I W U v^ ^n Q n p P p O 00 m m m N :n Z 00 m < O) Z N U zl Mo � w z 04'99 w �a o 3„£O,10.00N <¢ ro Y a� -- U) a� a � . rn a 0 00 m m z '00U 41 Sl 3„SZ,£Z.00—N £S'l9£ 3„SZ,£Z.00N I — v4vegs Am 'Sll '4S N a Z/l 3 30 NO1180d W Ln LYfINZAV LLSVLY P474 RESOLUTION NO. 13-052 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7391 EAST AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 1100-771-08, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal corporation, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Section 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to exercise its respective powers of eminent domain to acquire the property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution, under a joint powers agreement entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana on February 26, 2013, pursuant to Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California and Sections 12, and California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.140(a) and (b). Because Interstate 15, where it intersects with Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and with Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is a State Highway, the California Transportation Commission ("CTC") is the body authorized to consider the adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity. On March 29, 2013, the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans") authorized the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to conduct a hearing on the Resolution of Necessity and to adopt the Resolution of Necessity by a 4/5ths vote of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council. The property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution that the City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire are for a public use, namely to alleviate existing and future traffic congestion at on-ramps and off-ramps during peak morning and evening hours within the proposed Project limits, to accommodate current and future automobile and truck traffic, and to alleviate unsatisfactory conditions associated with the existing Interchange configuration at the Interstate 15 Interchange at Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and at Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana ("proposed Project"), and for all purposes necessary and convenient thereto in connection with the proposed Project pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19; California Government Code Sections 6500, 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010, et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including, but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.130, 1240.140 (a) and (b), 1240.250, 1240.350, 1240.410, 1240.420, 1240.510, 1240.530, 1240.610, 1240.640, 1240.650; Streets and Highways Code Sections 102, 114 and 130, and other provisions of the law. Chado Resolution No. 13-052 - Page 1 of 7 P475 Section 3. The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire abutter's rights which include air, light and view and abutter's access rights, a permanent highway easement of 381 square feet and a temporary construction easement of 317 square feet for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 7391 East Avenue, in the City of Fontana and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number 1100-771-08 in connection with the proposed Project ("Subject Property Interests.") The legal descriptions of the Subject Property Interests are attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" to this Resolution of Necessity. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated herein by this reference. The real property has a gross land area of 206,036 square feet and is irregular in shape. It is improved with commercial buildings, which will not be physically impacted by the proposed acquisition because no land or improvements will be acquired as part of the proposed Project. The abutter's rights are only as to approximately 21 feet along Baseline Avenue and no buildings or structures will be impacted. Section 4. The proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests are for a public purpose, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound diamond ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The primary operational deficiency associated with the existing interchange is caused by the interchange's geometric constraints and inadequate capacity. The intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue bisecting the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramp intersections results in a large queue of vehicles on Base Line Road. Due to short separations between the three intersections and delays caused by many signal phases, especially for left turn movements to the Interstate 15 ramps for Westbound traffic in the morning peak hours and Eastbound traffic in the evening peak hours, there is heavy queuing on Base Line Road. The queuing on Base Line Road during these peak hours, results in heavy queuing on the exit ramps, which includes heavy queuing for the Northbound exit ramp in the evening peak hours and for the Southbound exit ramp in the morning peak hours. The queuing at the exit ramps during the peak hours also leads to traffic backing up on the Interstate 15 mainline. Alternatives Considered for the proposed Proiect The City of Rancho Cucamonga analyzed the relative effectiveness of three proposed project alternatives and a no-build alternative, to accommodate forecasted year 2030 traffic at the Interchange. Alternative 1, the no-build alternative showed that if there were no improvements Chado Resolution No. 13-052 - Page 2 of 7 P476 made to the Interchange, the levels of service for traffic circulation in 2030 would be LOS "F," which is the worst possible level of service, and there would be a substantial increase in traffic accidents. Alternative 3, the cloverleaf, proposed the construction of two cloverleafs, one cloverleaf would be located in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange and the other cloverleaf would be located in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. Alternative 3 was not considered a viable alternative because not only did it have significant design and operational issues, it would have required the acquisition of right-of-way in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange. The acquisition of the right-of-way in the northeast quadrant would have resulted in significant impacts to current and future planned residential and commercial development. Alternative 2, partial cloverleaf, and Alternative 4, preferred alternative, were both considered as proposed projects. They had similar design features except for the following modifications to Alternative 4: • Base Line Road would be widened slightly more on the southerly side; The Northbound Loop entrance ramp would be replaced by Eastbound dual left turn lanes to the Northbound Interstate 15 freeway; The Diamond entrance ramp would be widened to receive dual left turns from Eastbound Base Line Road left lanes; • The Northbound exit ramp that utilizes existing East Avenue undercrossing bridge would need to be widened to accommodate the two lane exit; and • Two new bridges and one widened bridge would be required to be constructed. Alternative 4 was developed and selected as the preferred alternative for the Proposed Project because it met the purpose and need for the Interchange improvements and it eliminated the need for the acquisition of commercial buildings and the acquisition and relocation of fourteen (14) businesses in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. General Plan and Specific Plan Compliance Base Line Road is currently a four-lane roadway within the proposed Project limits. Because of recent and future planned housing, retail and commercial developments in the cities, improvements to Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 Interchange are necessary to accommodate population growth and the resulting increase in traffic demands. The Cities of Rancho Cucamonga's and Fontana's Circulation Elements of their respective General Plans specify that Base Line Road is intended to be a six to eight lane major highway or arterial within the proposed Project limits, and is intended to provide efficient high volume traffic flow within their Cities and the region. The proposed Project conforms to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Circulation Elements of its General Plan, General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require that Base Line Road be a six-lane Major Divided Highway within the proposed Project limits. Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently improved with four lanes within the proposed Project limits. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan specifies that six lanes within the proposed Project limits are sufficient to meet local and regional circulations needs for future growth. Chado Resolution No. 13-052 - Page 3 of 7 P477 The proposed Project also conforms to the City of Fontana's Circulation Elements of its General Plan and West End Specific Plan, which identifies Baseline Avenue as a major east-west highway, which can accommodate six to eight lanes of travel and allowing for raised medians. Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is currently improved with six lanes from Citrus Avenue to Interstate 15. The City of Fontana's General Plan specifies that within the proposed Project limits, it is recommended that arterial segments that are located between freeway ramps and the next parallel facility, on either side of the freeway, such as Baseline Avenue at Interstate 15, be planned with an additional lane in each direction beyond its designated functional classification. These lanes will function as "auxiliary lanes" for more freeway access capacity and more efficient traffic flow between the ramps and the adjacent intersections and can serve as dedicated right turn lanes at the next intersection. Section 5. As a proposed discretionary action by a local agency, the proposed Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. ("CEQA.") Further, because the proposed Project will be partially funded by the Federal Government, it is subject to the National Environmental Policy Act NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c) ("NEPA.") Accordingly, the proposed Project was subject to both federal and state environmental review. Caltrans was the designated lead agency under the current Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") and Caltrans' stewardship program. Therefore, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 327, Caltrans was tasked with being the lead agency for CEQA and NEPA compliance and for providing full over-sight on the planning, design and right-of-way acquisition for the proposed Project. As the lead agency for the proposed Project, Caltrans commissioned the preparation of an Initial Study along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") as required under CEQA, and an Environmental Assessment along with Finding of No Significant Impacts ("EA/FONSI") as required under NEPA. Caltrans studied and analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project to identify potentially significant impacts to the environment and to identify the most feasible alternative that would accomplish the basic project objectives while lessening or eliminating any potentially significant project impacts to the environment. Pursuant to the requirements under CEQA and NEPA, checklists were utilized in order to identify physical, biological, social and economic factors that might be affected by the proposed Project. In many cases, background studies performed in connection with the proposed Project indicated no impacts under CEQA and NEPA. The following factors were identified as having less than significant impact and were studied further for the purposes of the proposed Project: Visual/Aesthetics Review, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, Air Quality, NPDES/Water Quality, and Noise. Visual/Aesthetics Review For visual and aesthetics' review, compliance with CEQA requires, at a minimum, that a Scenic Resource Evaluation be conducted. Under NEPA, a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) is required to assess visual impacts of the proposed Project. A VIA, dated February 2011, was prepared as part of the proposed Project to satisfy the requirements of both CEQA and NEPA. Chado Resolution No. 13-052 - Page 4 of 7 P478 The VIA assessed the potential visual impacts and analyzed any potential changes of views of or from Interstate 15 and Base Line Road by the proposed Project. After performing extensive study and review, the VIA discussed the impacts of the proposed alternatives and made recommendations that certain measures be implemented in order to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse visual impacts. The measures recommended in the VIA have been considered as part of the design and construction of the proposed Project. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials An Initial Site Assessment (ISA) dated March 2007 along with a Supplemental Initial Site Assessment dated March 2011 (SISA) were prepared in order to assess the potential for hazardous waste and materials as part of the proposed Project. After having performed assessments, further study and multiple testing to determine the nature and extent of the potential for hazardous waste and materials within the proposed Project limits, certain handling recommendations were made in order to address Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) and asbestos containing materials (AGMs). In addition, a Limited Site Investigation was conducted to test for herbicides, pesticides, and metals associated with the applications of herbicides and pesticides during the operation of a former nursery within the proposed Project limits, there were no recommendations for further investigations of this former agricultural site. Air Quality and NPDES/Water Quality An Air Quality Analysis, dated February 2011, was prepared to review potential air quality issues associated with the proposed Project, and a storm water data report was prepared and approved by Caltrans on June 1, 2011 to consider water quality impacts of the proposed Project. Based on the findings of the analysis and report, no mitigation measures were needed for Air Quality and NPDES/water quality impacts as part of the proposed Project. Noise A Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) was prepared and approved on both March 4, 2011 and March 8, 2011. Based on the NADIR, when compared with Alternative 1-no build alternative, the noise levels of Alternatives 2 and 4 were expected to only increase by no more than 3dBA. Therefore, this increase in noise would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, sound barriers were not recommended for Alternative 4 under CEQA and NEPA standards. However, Caltrans requested, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga committed to the construction of a sound barrier (SB No. 4) at a height of approximately 14 feet adjacent to the off-ramp in the Northwest quadrant of the Interchange within the proposed Project limits. The purpose of which was to address potential noise impacts to the residences in the adjacent subdivision associated with the new location of the off-ramp in the northwest quadrant of the Interchange. Additional NEPA Requirements In addition to the above matters, NEPA also required consideration of Title VI, Independent Utility/Logical Termini and Environmental Justice. Chado Resolution No. 13-052 - Page 5 of 7 P479 Mitigation Requirements under CEQA and NEPA The proposed Project would have no significantly adverse effect on natural communities or wetlands or other waters within the proposed Project limits, because the following mitigation measures were required to reduce the potential effects to insignificance: • Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board; • Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game; • United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 14; and • Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination. The Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination letter was issued by FHWA (Federal Highway Commission) on June 15, 2011. With regard to the remaining mitigation measures, there was the option of either purchasing mitigation credits from an off-site mitigation bank or participation in an in-lieu fee program; however, final determination would be made by the applicable resource agency. Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Finding of No Significant Impacts The Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Finding of No Significant Impacts along with the mitigation requirements previously identified, were approved on September 30, 2011. The Notices of Availability were distributed to federal, state, regional and local agencies, and certain elected officials and property owners and were published in the appropriate publications on September 30, 2011. There have been no challenges to the IS/MND and EA/FONSI. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The property described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto is necessary for the proposed Project; D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owners of record. Section 7. The City has complied with the notice requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. Section 8. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council on May 1, 2013, which includes the Staff Report dated May 1, Chado Resolution No. 13-052 - Page 6 of 7 P480 2013 and all documents referenced therein, including the environmental documents referenced above, and any testimony, records, and documents produced at the hearing, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 9. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney's office and staff to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. Chado Resolution No. 13-052 - Page 7 of 7 P481 EXHIBIT A P482 EXHIBIT "A" 22603-1 THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15412, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 189, PAGES 71 THROUGH 72, OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 00 023'25" WEST 18.00 FEET; THENCE PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL NORTH 89 058'57" WEST 21.15 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE GRANT DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED ON OCTOBER 28, 2009 AS DOCUMENT#2009-0471595, CITED AS "NORTH 0°14'28" WEST,39.00 FEET"; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 00 023'25" EAST 18.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY PROLONGATION SOUTH 89 058'57"EAST 21.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 381 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT`B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS-OF- WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD IF ANY. O �_A N O SCR V XICOTENCATL � E. v SALA7_AR XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 EXP. NO.9 530-14 e LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 F OF c A_\F o P483 EXHIBIT "A" 22603-2 THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF A FREEWAY AND THE GRANTOR HEREBY RELEASES AND RELINQUISHES TO THE GRANTEE ANY AND ALL ABUTTER'S RIGHTS, INCLUDING ACCESS RIGHTS APPURTENANT TO GRANTOR'S REMAINING PROPERTY, OVER AND ACROSS THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT LOCATED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15412, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 189, PAGES 71 THROUGH 72, OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT SOUTH 00°23'25" WEST 18.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL NORTH 89 058'57" WEST 21.15 FEET; ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. �O AND SLR XI CO F C TEN CAT L L E. A SALAZAR N0. 5507 XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 J, EXP. 9-30-14 P* LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 9TF of c A 08- SBd - 15-PM 6.8 - 22603 (22603-2) P484 EXHIBIT `A' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 22603-3 THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT LOCATED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15412, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 189, PAGES 71 THROUGH 72, OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 00 023'25" WEST 18.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 00 023'25" WEST 15.00 FEET; THENCE PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL NORTH 89 058'57" WEST 21.15 FEET; THENCE PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3 NORTH 00 023'25" EAST 15.00 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 18.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM SAID WESTERLY PROLONGATION; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 89 058'57" EAST 21.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 317 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS-OF- WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD IF ANY. AND SGR (� XICOTENCATL E. A SALA7_AR XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 No. 0- P. 9-330-14 P LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 T911 F OF CA FO P485 EXHIBIT B P486 OR D h Q r U Q oo a O Z N in I cad O -3 0 Q O O '5C' '�� N z a 4i 1� W 00'ZL N 1 � N CO 1� 00 O N O .�- CV M Wz\ CV O a rn 00 X¢ w Z C/) z a� M O Q a a a � � a U) w 0 CO J �— U i N U-) C4 m w 00 u�'J N J In 3 M O X 00� M °zn 3 wz \ LLJ Z — ro 6 a m n r- O d or Q p r] ¢ ao M Q < 00 m a m 00 co z a w M Ln M I- � M 00 O O W a N U CL U a m z a Q m a O � M„SZ,cZ.00S _ 007L '29 l92 w ,00'81 C) 3„SZ,£Z.00N 3„9Z,£Z.00N f— �n In n Ln w 00 00 00 r N M d L CD N / 0o N 00 �m ,00 8l z o m lw N 3„9Z,2Z.00N zn \LLm Ida O Ln N �o OGC � �m ZV; � J "II 0)o'o � ti � W W O N d N 0 J W wa Q ZO >- o J O [Y N W H (n — Q U W O LYIINLV V LLEVLY P487 OR J � a O U Q 00 a Z N nn O 4 W W J II .j O ( za O W SS� x wZP 4 W Q �O � I N r_, N N � N O N o N Z aim O � a � I a U) W " � I CO QN U N M W �_ N `n CJ _ } n p � n O I WZ I wZ \ _j Q U a rn M LLJ d yam ¢� ^ a0 (.6 awl 'n M Q � m O � a c� a � Ud U I a Z � m U a o Q °� a a 0 a 3„Sl ,E7.00N _ — ,0081 3 IU- I I n W _ `N 00 I �m 00'8l Z W VI Z O o m N J II F �\\� Q d N w J ° a U N ,7I1N,VAV SSVV �- P488 OR h Q j O Z N oO a U-) Q W W Q L"." U W pQ O O V) Za w Q U � I N N M 1 M � N ^ n Q N O 1 J Z n N �¢ ao Z ¢� M awm O 0Ca 0 d I a U - - - - - w " � I m QJ N 0 N L0 V N m w X �z � JZ � Z w \ � W a LLJ Q < m n 7 � ¢ 0010 CL ¢s � e0 co Q � mi+7 d J m O � ° 00 ^ Ua Z Of U d Q ktA.gUz.00S 0 a H OO'81 w '00,913 U-) u^i n w I 0 � �ol Y :n U) 1 00,2[ 00 N (/7 00 N I �m U 00'91:z 1 w N 3„SZ,U.00N `Z o 0 C4 3 I aN W J Q U N L7f]NLY 1V 1LEVZ P489 RESOLUTION NO. 13-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7175 GREEN GLEN COURT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 0227-012- 01, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal corporation, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Section 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to exercise its respective powers of eminent domain to acquire the property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution, under a joint powers agreement entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana on February 26, 2013, pursuant to Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California and Sections 12, and California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.140(a) and (b). Because Interstate 15, where it intersects with Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and with Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is a State Highway, the California Transportation Commission ("CTC") is the body authorized to consider the adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity. On March 29, 2013, the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans") authorized the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to conduct a hearing on the Resolution of Necessity and to adopt the Resolution of Necessity by a 4/5ths vote of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council. The property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution that the City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire are for a public use, namely to alleviate existing and future traffic congestion at on-ramps and off-ramps during peak morning and evening hours within the proposed Project limits, to accommodate current and future automobile and truck traffic, and to alleviate unsatisfactory conditions associated with the existing Interchange configuration at the Interstate 15 Interchange at Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and at Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana ("proposed Project"), and for all purposes necessary and convenient thereto in connection with the proposed Project pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19; California Government Code Sections 6500, 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010, et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including, but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.130, 1240.140 (a) and (b), 1240.250, 1240.350, 1240.410, 1240.420, 1240.510, 1240.530, 1240.610, 1240.640, 1240.650; Streets and Highways Code Sections 102, 114 and 130, and other provisions of the law. Tamayo Resolution No. 13-053 - Page 1 of 7 P490 Section 3. The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire a permanent highway easement of 249 square feet and a temporary construction easement of 1,070 square feet for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the real property commonly known as 7175 Green Glen Court, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number 0227-012-01 in connection with the proposed Project ("Subject Property Interests.") The legal descriptions of the Subject Property Interests are attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" to this Resolution of Necessity. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated herein by this reference. The real property has a gross land area of 13,696 square feet and is rectangular in shape. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be physically impacted by the proposed acquisition because no land or improvements will be acquired as part of the proposed Project. The acquisition area is located outside a perimeter wall and is already encumbered with a landscape and a sidewalk easement in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Section 4. The proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests are for a public purpose, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound diamond ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The primary operational deficiency associated with the existing interchange is caused by the interchange's geometric constraints and inadequate capacity. The intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue bisecting the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramp intersections results in a large queue of vehicles on Base Line Road. Due to short separations between the three intersections and delays caused by many signal phases, especially for left turn movements to the Interstate 15 ramps for Westbound traffic in the morning peak hours and Eastbound traffic in the evening peak hours, there is heavy queuing on Base Line Road. The queuing on Base Line Road during these peak hours, results in heavy queuing on the exit ramps, which includes heavy queuing for the Northbound exit ramp in the evening peak hours and for the Southbound exit ramp in the morning peak hours. The queuing at the exit ramps during the peak hours also leads to traffic backing up on the Interstate 15 mainline. Alternatives Considered for the proposed Proiect The City of Rancho Cucamonga analyzed the relative effectiveness of three proposed project alternatives and a no-build alternative, to accommodate forecasted year 2030 traffic at the Interchange. Alternative 1, the no-build alternative showed that if there were no improvements Tamayo Resolution No. 13-053 - Page 2 of 7 P491 made to the Interchange, the levels of service for traffic circulation in 2030 would be LOS "F," which is the worst possible level of service, and there would be a substantial increase in traffic accidents. Alternative 3, the cloverleaf, proposed the construction of two cloverleafs, one cloverleaf would be located in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange and the other cloverleaf would be located in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. Alternative 3 was not considered a viable alternative because not only did it have significant design and operational issues, it would have required the acquisition of right-of-way in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange. The acquisition of the right-of-way in the northeast quadrant would have resulted in significant impacts to current and future planned residential and commercial development. Alternative 2, partial cloverleaf, and Alternative 4, preferred alternative, were both considered as proposed projects. They had similar design features except for the following modifications to Alternative 4: • Base Line Road would be widened slightly more on the southerly side; The Northbound Loop entrance ramp would be replaced by Eastbound dual left turn lanes to the Northbound Interstate 15 freeway; The Diamond entrance ramp would be widened to receive dual left turns from Eastbound Base Line Road left lanes; • The Northbound exit ramp that utilizes existing East Avenue undercrossing bridge would need to be widened to accommodate the two lane exit; and Two new bridges and one widened bridge would be required to be constructed. Alternative 4 was developed and selected as the preferred alternative for the Proposed Project because it met the purpose and need for the Interchange improvements and it eliminated the need for the acquisition of commercial buildings and the acquisition and relocation of fourteen (14) businesses in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. General Plan and Specific Plan Compliance Base Line Road is currently a four-lane roadway within the proposed Project limits. Because of recent and future planned housing, retail and commercial developments in the cities, improvements to Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 Interchange are necessary to accommodate population growth and the resulting increase in traffic demands. The Cities of Rancho Cucamonga's and Fontana's Circulation Elements of their respective General Plans specify that Base Line Road is intended to be a six to eight lane major highway or arterial within the proposed Project limits, and is intended to provide efficient high volume traffic flow within their Cities and the region. The proposed Project conforms to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Circulation Elements of its General Plan, General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require that Base Line Road be a six-lane Major Divided Highway within the proposed Project limits. Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently improved with four lanes within the proposed Project limits. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan specifies that six lanes within the proposed Project limits are sufficient to meet local and regional circulations needs for future growth. Tamayo Resolution No. 13-053 - Page 3 of 7 P492 The proposed Project also conforms to the City of Fontana's Circulation Elements of its General Plan and West End Specific Plan, which identifies Baseline Avenue as a major east-west highway, which can accommodate six to eight lanes of travel and allowing for raised medians. Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is currently improved with six lanes from Citrus Avenue to Interstate 15. The City of Fontana's General Plan specifies that within the proposed Project limits, it is recommended that arterial segments that are located between freeway ramps and the next parallel facility, on either side of the freeway, such as Baseline Avenue at Interstate 15, be planned with an additional lane in each direction beyond its designated functional classification. These lanes will function as "auxiliary lanes" for more freeway access capacity and more efficient traffic flow between the ramps and the adjacent intersections and can serve as dedicated right turn lanes at the next intersection. Section 5. As a proposed discretionary action by a local agency, the proposed Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. ("CEQA.") Further, because the proposed Project will be partially funded by the Federal Government, it is subject to the National Environmental Policy Act NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c) ("NEPA.") Accordingly, the proposed Project was subject to both federal and state environmental review. Caltrans was the designated lead agency under the current Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") and Caltrans' stewardship program. Therefore, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 327, Caltrans was tasked with being the lead agency for CEQA and NEPA compliance and for providing full over-sight on the planning, design and right-of-way acquisition for the proposed Project. As the lead agency for the proposed Project, Caltrans commissioned the preparation of an Initial Study along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") as required under CEQA, and an Environmental Assessment along with Finding of No Significant Impacts ("EA/FONSI") as required under NEPA. Caltrans studied and analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project to identify potentially significant impacts to the environment and to identify the most feasible alternative that would accomplish the basic project objectives while lessening or eliminating any potentially significant project impacts to the environment. Pursuant to the requirements under CEQA and NEPA, checklists were utilized in order to identify physical, biological, social and economic factors that might be affected by the proposed Project. In many cases, background studies performed in connection with the proposed Project indicated no impacts under CEQA and NEPA. The following factors were identified as having less than significant impact and were studied further for the purposes of the proposed Project: Visual/Aesthetics Review, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, Air Quality, NPDES/Water Quality, and Noise. Visual/Aesthetics Review For visual and aesthetics' review, compliance with CEQA requires, at a minimum, that a Scenic Resource Evaluation be conducted. Under NEPA, a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) is required to assess visual impacts of the proposed Project. A VIA, dated February 2011, was prepared as part of the proposed Project to satisfy the requirements of both CEQA and NEPA. Tamayo Resolution No. 13-053 - Page 4 of 7 P493 The VIA assessed the potential visual impacts and analyzed any potential changes of views of or from Interstate 15 and Base Line Road by the proposed Project. After performing extensive study and review, the VIA discussed the impacts of the proposed alternatives and made recommendations that certain measures be implemented in order to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse visual impacts. The measures recommended in the VIA have been considered as part of the design and construction of the proposed Project. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials An Initial Site Assessment (ISA) dated March 2007 along with a Supplemental Initial Site Assessment dated March 2011 (SISA) were prepared in order to assess the potential for hazardous waste and materials as part of the proposed Project. After having performed assessments, further study and multiple testing to determine the nature and extent of the potential for hazardous waste and materials within the proposed Project limits, certain handling recommendations were made in order to address Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) and asbestos containing materials (ACMs). In addition, a Limited Site Investigation was conducted to test for herbicides, pesticides, and metals associated with the applications of herbicides and pesticides during the operation of a former nursery within the proposed Project limits, there were no recommendations for further investigations of this former agricultural site. Air Quality and NPDES/Water Quality An Air Quality Analysis, dated February 2011, was prepared to review potential air quality issues associated with the proposed Project, and a storm water data report was prepared and approved by Caltrans on June 1, 2011 to consider water quality impacts of the proposed Project. Based on the findings of the analysis and report, no mitigation measures were needed for Air Quality and NPDES/water quality impacts as part of the proposed Project. Noise A Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) was prepared and approved on both March 4, 2011 and March 8, 2011. Based on the NADR, when compared with Alternative 1-no build alternative, the noise levels of Alternatives 2 and 4 were expected to only increase by no more than 3dBA. Therefore, this increase in noise would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, sound barriers were not recommended for Alternative 4 under CEQA and NEPA standards. However, Caltrans requested, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga committed to the construction of a sound barrier (SB No. 4) at a height of approximately 14 feet adjacent to the off-ramp in the Northwest quadrant of the Interchange within the proposed Project limits. The purpose of which was to address potential noise impacts to the residences in the adjacent subdivision associated with the new location of the off-ramp in the northwest quadrant of the Interchange. Additional NEPA Requirements In addition to the above matters, NEPA also required consideration of Title VI, Independent Utility/Logical Termini and Environmental Justice. Tamayo Resolution No. 13-053 - Page 5 of 7 P494 Mitigation Requirements under CEQA and NEPA The proposed Project would have no significantly adverse effect on natural communities or wetlands or other waters within the proposed Project limits, because the following mitigation measures were required to reduce the potential effects to insignificance: • Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board; • Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game; • United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 14; and • Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination. The Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination letter was issued by FHWA (Federal Highway Commission) on June 15, 2011. With regard to the remaining mitigation measures, there was the option of either purchasing mitigation credits from an off-site mitigation bank or participation in an in-lieu fee program; however, final determination would be made by the applicable resource agency. Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Finding of No Significant Impacts The Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Finding of No Significant Impacts along with the mitigation requirements previously identified, were approved on September 30, 2011. The Notices of Availability were distributed to federal, state, regional and local agencies, and certain elected officials and property owners and were published in the appropriate publications on September 30, 2011. There have been no challenges to the IS/MND and EA/FONSI. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The property described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto is necessary for the proposed Project; D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owners of record. Section 7. The City has complied with the notice requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. Section S. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council on May 1, 2013, which includes the Staff Report dated May 1, Tamayo Resolution No. 13-053 - Page 6 of 7 P495 2013 and all documents referenced therein, including the environmental documents referenced above, and any testimony, records, and documents produced at the hearing, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 9. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney's office and staff to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. Tamayo Resolution No. 13-053 - Page 7 of 7 I P496 EXHIBIT A P497 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL 22591-1 THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF LOT 1 OF TRACT NO. 15912, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FILE IN BOOK 279, PAGES 6 THROUGH 7 OF TRACT MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT NORTH 00 004'22" WEST 97.14 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE NORTH 45 005'23" WEST 1.54 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 01°37'28" WEST 97.84 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 83 054'07" EAST 4.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 249 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD83), ZONE 5, 1992.88 EPOCH. DIVIDE ALL DISTANCES BY 0.99992483 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. LAND SL,p F C IXICOTEN CAT � J E. p XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 SALAZAR LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 EXPO.9-30-14 Sr �P F DF C AXLE P498 EXHIBIT "A" TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT PARCEL 22591-2 THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF LOT 1 OF TRACT NO. 15912, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FILE IN BOOK 279, PAGES 6 THROUGH 7 OF TRACT MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT DISTANT THEREON NORTH 83 054'07" WEST 4.01 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 83 054'07" WEST 6.04 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 10.00 FEET WESTERLY FROM THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 00 004'22" WEST 91.91 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 10.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 45 005'23" WEST 31.23 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 5.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 89 054'37"WEST 6.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 004'22"WEST 5.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 89 054'37"EAST 15.53 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 45 005'23" EAST 30.90 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE DISTANT THEREON NORTH 45 005'23" WEST 1.54 FEET FROM THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 01 037'28" WEST 97.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1,070 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT `B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. SHEET 1 OF 2 P499 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM(NAD83),ZONE 5, 1992.88 EPOCH. DIVIDE ALL DISTANCES BY 0.99992483 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AND SGPG F V XICOTEN CATL � XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 E. ° LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 SALAZAR No. 5507 EXP. 9-30-14 J` F OF 0P\>F SHEET 2 OF 2 P500 EXHIBIT B P501 OR . b M Q K �� Q Z N o0 Q On W ¢ WW < Lo W Q f Q O � �� Z x S� x SAP �7�M,,ZZ,bO.00ON Jfl T rV Y rm7 LD � o CN m L _ 3 o M o Z ;.-j a � o N � cn � H o Lo 4l'L6 M„ZZ,bO.00N U z / ,ti8'L6 M„K,L�.IOS I o / � I 0o J ( o Q W � W X >- q N w Q w Li g rn a I �I o - I F 0 of Q U z oz J CIA to m --1 l o UI i Q zl I w � I I � _ I I \ P502 OR F-- a j o U Q 00 a z N Nn W Q W W J 0 N� W J J O Q 0 Q (1) za N OAS X w P M„ZZ,40.00N N ( LVnNLVAV LEVY m I ”) o Lo N N Ln n o _ N d d p Z Ln Z O z � o b l'L6_M„ZZ,b0.00N F — — — — b8'L6 M, Z,/C.lOS m Ln W J6'16 M„ZZ,b0.00N I a h L� m J � I s i ° X >- q cv I n wQ W ern rn � I z Q', I N p M U C~ rn o ro I— O o f U z t o n O z N O y`tn I IZ �I O UI < zl Y I Cyl I I � I I I \ P503 RESOLUTION NO. 13-054 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7221 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 0227-693-52, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal corporation, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Section 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to exercise its respective powers of eminent domain to acquire the property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution, under a joint powers agreement entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana on February 26, 2013, pursuant to Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California and Sections 12, and California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.140(a) and (b). Because Interstate 15, where it intersects with Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and with Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is a State Highway, the California Transportation Commission ("CTC") is the body authorized to consider the adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity. On March 29, 2013, the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans") authorized the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to conduct a hearing on the Resolution of Necessity and to adopt the Resolution of Necessity by a 4/5ths vote of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council. The property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution that the City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire are for a public use, namely to alleviate existing and future traffic congestion at on-ramps and off-ramps during peak morning and evening hours within the proposed Project limits, to accommodate current and future automobile and truck traffic, and to alleviate unsatisfactory conditions associated with the existing Interchange configuration at the Interstate 15 Interchange at Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and at Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana ("proposed Project"), and for all purposes necessary and convenient thereto in connection with the proposed Project pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19; California Government Code Sections 6500, 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010, et seq. (Eminent domain Law), including, but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.130, 1240.140 (a) and (b), 1240.250, 1240.350, 1240.410, 1240.420, 1240.510, 1240.530, 1240.610, 1240.640, 1240.650; Streets and Highways Code Sections 102, 114 and 130, and other provisions of the law. REO/Pierson Resolution No. 13-054 - Page 1 of 7 P504 Section 3. The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire abutter's rights which include air, light and view and abutter's access rights from the real property commonly known as 7221 Acorn Place, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number 0227-693-52 in connection with the proposed Project ("Subject Property Interests.") The legal descriptions of the Subject Property Interests are attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" to this Resolution of Necessity. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated herein by this reference. The real property has a gross land area of 8,474 square feet and is irregular in shape. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be physically impacted by the proposed acquisition because no land or improvements will be acquired as part of the proposed Project. Section 4. The proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests are for a public purpose, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound diamond ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The primary operational deficiency associated with the existing interchange is caused by the interchange's geometric constraints and inadequate capacity. The intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue bisecting the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramp intersections results in a large queue of vehicles on Base Line Road. Due to short separations between the three intersections and delays caused by many signal phases, especially for left turn movements to the Interstate 15 ramps for Westbound traffic in the morning peak hours and Eastbound traffic in the evening peak hours, there is heavy queuing on Base Line Road. The queuing on Base Line Road during these peak hours, results in heavy queuing on the exit ramps, which includes heavy queuing for the Northbound exit ramp in the evening peak hours and for the Southbound exit ramp in the morning peak hours. The queuing at the exit ramps during the peak hours also leads to traffic backing up on the Interstate 15 mainline. Alternatives Considered for the proposed Project The City of Rancho Cucamonga analyzed the relative effectiveness of three proposed project alternatives and a no-build alternative, to accommodate forecasted year 2030 traffic at the Interchange. Alternative 1, the no-build alternative showed that if there were no improvements made to the Interchange, the levels of service for traffic circulation in 2030 would be LOS "F," which is the worst possible level of service, and there would be a substantial increase in traffic accidents. Alternative 3, the cloverleaf, proposed the construction of two cloverleafs, one REO/Pierson Resolution No. 13-054 - Page 2 of 7 P505 cloverleaf would be located in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange and the other cloverleaf would be located in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. Alternative 3 was not considered a viable alternative because not only did it have significant design and operational issues, it would have required the acquisition of right-of-way in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange. The acquisition of the right-of-way in the northeast quadrant would have resulted in significant impacts to current and future planned residential and commercial development. Alternative 2, partial cloverleaf, and Alternative 4, preferred alternative, were both considered as proposed projects. They had similar design features except for the following modifications to Alternative 4: • Base Line Road would be widened slightly more on the southerly side; The Northbound Loop entrance ramp would be replaced by Eastbound dual left turn lanes to the Northbound Interstate 15 freeway; • The Diamond entrance ramp would be widened to receive dual left turns from Eastbound Base Line Road left lanes; • The Northbound exit ramp that utilizes existing East Avenue undercrossing bridge would need to be widened to accommodate the two lane exit; and • Two new bridges and one widened bridge would be required to be constructed. Alternative 4 was developed and selected as the preferred alternative for the Proposed Project because it met the purpose and need for the Interchange improvements and it eliminated the need for the acquisition of commercial buildings and the acquisition and relocation of fourteen (14) businesses in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. General Plan and Specific Plan Compliance Base Line Road is currently a four-lane roadway within the proposed Project limits. Because of recent and future planned housing, retail and commercial developments in the cities, improvements to Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 Interchange are necessary to accommodate population growth and the resulting increase in traffic demands. The Cities of Rancho Cucamonga's and Fontana's Circulation Elements of their respective General Plans specify that Base Line Road is intended to be a six to eight lane major highway or arterial within the proposed Project limits, and is intended to provide efficient high volume traffic flow within their Cities and the region. The proposed Project conforms to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Circulation Elements of its General Plan, General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require that Base Line Road be a six-lane Major Divided Highway within the proposed Project limits. Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently improved with four lanes within the proposed Project limits. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan specifies that six lanes within the proposed Project limits are sufficient to meet local and regional circulations needs for future growth. The proposed Project also conforms to the City of Fontana's Circulation Elements of its General Plan and West End Specific Plan, which identifies Baseline Avenue as a major east-west highway, which can accommodate six to eight lanes of travel and allowing for raised medians. REO/Pierson Resolution No. 13-054- Page 3 of 7 P506 Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is currently improved with six lanes from Citrus Avenue to Interstate 15. The City of Fontana's General Plan specifies that within the proposed Project limits, it is recommended that arterial segments that are located between freeway ramps and the next parallel facility, on either side of the freeway, such as Baseline Avenue at Interstate 15, be planned with an additional lane in each direction beyond its designated functional classification. These lanes will function as "auxiliary lanes" for more freeway access capacity and more efficient traffic flow between the ramps and the adjacent intersections and can serve as dedicated right turn lanes at the next intersection. Section 5. As a proposed discretionary action by a local agency, the proposed Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. ("CEQA.") Further, because the proposed Project will be partially funded by the Federal Government, it is subject to the National Environmental Policy Act NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c) ("NEPA.") Accordingly, the proposed Project was subject to both federal and state environmental review. Caltrans was the designated lead agency under the current Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") and Caltrans' stewardship program. Therefore, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 327, Caltrans was tasked with being the lead agency for CEQA and NEPA compliance and for providing full over-sight on the planning, design and right-of-way acquisition for the proposed Project. As the lead agency for the proposed Project, Caltrans commissioned the preparation of an Initial Study along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") as required under CEQA, and an Environmental Assessment along with Finding of No Significant Impacts ("EA/FONSI") as required under NEPA. Caltrans studied and analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project to identify potentially significant impacts to the environment and to identify the most feasible alternative that would accomplish the basic project objectives while lessening or eliminating any potentially significant project impacts to the environment. Pursuant to the requirements under CEQA and NEPA, checklists were utilized in order to identify physical, biological, social and economic factors that might be affected by the proposed Project. In many cases, background studies performed in connection with the proposed Project indicated no impacts under CEQA and NEPA. The following factors were identified as having less than significant impact and were studied further for the purposes of the proposed Project: Visual/Aesthetics Review, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, Air Quality, NPDES/Water Quality, and Noise. Visual/Aesthetics Review For visual and aesthetics' review, compliance with CEQA requires, at a minimum, that a Scenic Resource Evaluation be conducted. Under NEPA, a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) is required to assess visual impacts of the proposed Project. A VIA, dated February 2011, was prepared as part of the proposed Project to satisfy the requirements of both CEQA and NEPA. The VIA assessed the potential visual impacts and analyzed any potential changes of views of or from Interstate 15 and Base Line Road by the proposed Project. REO/Pierson Resolution No. 13-054 - Page 4 of 7 P507 After performing extensive study and review, the VIA discussed the impacts of the proposed alternatives and made recommendations that certain measures be implemented in order to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse visual impacts. The measures recommended in the VIA have been considered as part of the design and construction of the proposed Project. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials An Initial Site Assessment (ISA) dated March 2007 along with a Supplemental Initial Site Assessment dated March 2011 (SISA) were prepared in order to assess the potential for hazardous waste and materials as part of the proposed Project. After having performed assessments, further study and multiple testing to determine the nature and extent of the potential for hazardous waste and materials within the proposed Project limits, certain handling recommendations were made in order to address Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) and asbestos containing materials (AGMs). In addition, a Limited Site Investigation was conducted to test for herbicides, pesticides, and metals associated with the applications of herbicides and pesticides during the operation of a former nursery within the proposed Project limits, there were no recommendations for further investigations of this former agricultural site. Air Quality and NPDES/Water Quality An Air Quality Analysis, dated February 2011, was prepared to review potential air quality issues associated with the proposed Project, and a storm water data report was prepared and approved by Caltrans on June 1, 2011 to consider water quality impacts of the proposed Project. Based on the findings of the analysis and report, no mitigation measures were needed for Air Quality and NPDES/water quality impacts as part of the proposed Project. Noise A Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) was prepared and approved on both March 4, 2011 and March S, 2011. Based on the NADIR, when compared with Alternative 1-no build alternative, the noise levels of Alternatives 2 and 4 were expected to only increase by no more than 3d BA. Therefore, this increase in noise would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, sound barriers were not recommended for Alternative 4 under CEQA and NEPA standards. However, Caltrans requested, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga committed to the construction of a sound barrier (SB No. 4) at a height of approximately 14 feet adjacent to the off-ramp in the Northwest quadrant of the Interchange within the proposed Project limits. The purpose of which was to address potential noise impacts to the residences in the adjacent subdivision associated with the new location of the off-ramp in the northwest quadrant of the Interchange. Additional NEPA Requirements In addition to the above matters, NEPA also required consideration of Title VI, Independent Utility/Logical Termini and Environmental Justice. REO/Pierson Resolution No. 13-054 -Page 5 of 7 P508 Mitigation Requirements under CEQA and NEPA The proposed Project would have no significantly adverse effect on natural communities or wetlands or other waters within the proposed Project limits, because the following mitigation measures were required to reduce the potential effects to insignificance: • Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board; • Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game; • United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 14; and • Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination. The Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination letter was issued by FHWA (Federal Highway Commission) on June 15, 2011. With regard to the remaining mitigation measures, there was the option of either purchasing mitigation credits from an off-site mitigation bank or participation in an in-lieu fee program; however, final determination would be made by the applicable resource agency. Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Findinq of No Significant Impacts The Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Finding of No Significant Impacts along with the mitigation requirements previously identified, were approved on September 30, 2011. The Notices of Availability were distributed to federal, state, regional and local agencies, and certain elected officials and property owners and were published in the appropriate publications on September 30, 2011. There have been no challenges to the IS/MND and EA/FONSI. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The property described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto is necessary for the proposed Project; D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owners of record. Section 7. The City has complied with the notice requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. Section 8. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council on May 1, 2013, which includes the Staff Report dated May 1, REO/Pierson Resolution No. 13-054 - Page 6 of 7 P509 2013 and all documents referenced therein, including the environmental documents referenced above, and any testimony, records, and documents produced at the hearing, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 9. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney's office and staff to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. REO/Pierson Resolution No. 13-054 - Page 7 of 7 P510 EXHIBIT A P511 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL 22681-1 THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF A FREEWAY AND THE GRANTOR HEREBY RELEASES AND RELINQUISHES TO THE GRANTEE ANY AND ALL ABUTTER'S RIGHTS, INCLUDING ACCESS RIGHTS APPURTENANT TO GRANTOR'S REMAINING PROPERTY, OVER AND ACROSS THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 52 OF TRACT NO. 16776, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FILE IN BOOK 320, PAGES 95 THROUGH 100 OF TRACT MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTH 00 003'38" WEST 66.30 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD83),ZONE 5, 1992.88 EPOCH. DIVIDE ALL DISTANCES BY 0.99992483 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AND SLR F C� XICOTE. CATL �O � E. v XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 SALAZAR LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 NO. 5507 EXP. 9-30-14 9lF OF C A \E QED 08- SBd - 15-PM 6.5-22681 (22681-1) P512 EXHIBIT B P513 ypR r ��E J bitib < o U a co Z a W w 0 0 1 c' lqj co ~ a d �s X M„ZZ,b0.00N ZnnLVn e ss VL o N Z X w N O d � w U 'n M (n W T) 00 m JQ Z F- m J O Z _ x } II J LL) w Z o W Q m CL LLI U N O U' o U U Q 00 J U H J Z a`OO 1 (7) r w 0 CL d V (Y a 00 n QMrn I Q IL J m w io v a II Q 1 4 a 1 M„K,EO.00N { tib'09 ------------------------- - 1 M„8C,2O.00N ,OF'99 wu 1 I O rnl Q cp a 'n / NI ) N Lo Ln Lo i10 r 00 O r� i J I In i i' 111 i p i W O ~ OJ 'O O ,11 U < My - - i In �1 m , in Z O rn ,70V7d Nyoov o a X m P514 RESOLUTION NO. 13-055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13089 FALLING OAK DRIVE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 0227-693- 54, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, NAMELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD/BASELINE AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal corporation, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Section 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to exercise its respective powers of eminent domain to acquire the property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution, under a joint powers agreement entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana on February 26, 2013, pursuant to Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California and Sections 12, and California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.140(a) and (b). Because Interstate 15, where it intersects with Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and with Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is a State Highway, the California Transportation Commission ("CTC") is the body authorized to consider the adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity. On March 29, 2013, the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans") authorized the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to conduct a hearing on the Resolution of Necessity and to adopt the Resolution of Necessity by a 4/5ths vote of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council. The property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution that the City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire are for a public use, namely to alleviate existing and future traffic congestion at on-ramps and off-ramps during peak morning and evening hours within the proposed Project limits, to accommodate current and future automobile and truck traffic, and to alleviate unsatisfactory conditions associated with the existing Interchange configuration at the Interstate 15 Interchange at Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and at Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana ("proposed Project"), and for all purposes necessary and convenient thereto in connection with the proposed Project pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19; California Government Code Sections 6500, 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010, et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including, but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.130, 1240.140 (a) and (b), 1240.250, 1240.350, 1240.410, 1240.420, 1240.510, 1240.530, 1240.610, 1240.640, 1240.650; Streets and Highways Code Sections 102, 114 and 130, and other provisions of the law. Lopez Resolution No. 13-055 - Page 1 of 7 P515 Section 3. The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks to acquire abutter's rights which include air, light and view and abutter's access rights and a permanent highway easement of 880 square feet from the real property commonly known as 13089 Falling Oak Drive, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number 0227- 693-54 in connection with the proposed Project ("Subject Property Interests.") The legal descriptions of the Subject Property Interests are attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" to this Resolution of Necessity. Exhibits "A" and "B" are incorporated herein by this reference. The real property has a gross land area of 14,496 square feet and is irregular in shape. It is improved with a single family residence, which will not be physically impacted by the proposed acquisition because no land or improvements will be acquired as part of the proposed Project. The partial acquisition area is located outside the perimeter wall of the subdivision in which the property is located and the area has been maintained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Section 4. The proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests are for a public purpose, namely to improve operational standards, enhance safety characteristics, and to provide increased traffic capacity at the Base Line Road and Interstate 15 Interchange in the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, which include: • Widening Base Line Road from four to six lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; • Widening East Avenue from two to four lanes and adding right and left turn lanes at Base Line Road; • Realigning and widening the Southbound and Northbound diamond ramps from one to two lanes; • Adding a Southbound Loop on-ramp; and • Adding Interstate 15 acceleration and deceleration lanes. The primary operational deficiency associated with the existing interchange is caused by the interchange's geometric constraints and inadequate capacity. The intersection of Base Line Road and East Avenue bisecting the diamond interchange between the Southbound and Northbound Interstate 15 ramp intersections results in a large queue of vehicles on Base Line Road. Due to short separations between the three intersections and delays caused by many signal phases, especially for left turn movements to the Interstate 15 ramps for Westbound traffic in the morning peak hours and Eastbound traffic in the evening peak hours, there is heavy queuing on Base Line Road. The queuing on Base Line Road during these peak hours, results in heavy queuing on the exit ramps, which includes heavy queuing for the Northbound exit ramp in the evening peak hours and for the Southbound exit ramp in the morning peak hours. The queuing at the exit ramps during the peak hours also leads to traffic backing up on the Interstate 15 mainline. Alternatives Considered for the proposed Project The City of Rancho Cucamonga analyzed the relative effectiveness of three proposed project alternatives and a no-build alternative, to accommodate forecasted year 2030 traffic at the Interchange. Alternative 1, the no-build alternative showed that if there were no improvements Lopez Resolution No. 13-055 - Page 2 of 7 P516 made to the Interchange, the levels of service for traffic circulation in 2030 would be LOS "F," which is the worst possible level of service, and there would be a substantial increase in traffic accidents. Alternative 3, the cloverleaf, proposed the construction of two cloverleafs, one cloverleaf would be located in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange and the other cloverleaf would be located in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. Alternative 3 was not considered a viable alternative because not only did it have significant design and operational issues, it would have required the acquisition of right-of-way in the northeast quadrant of the Interchange. The acquisition of the right-of-way in the northeast quadrant would have resulted in significant impacts to current and future planned residential and commercial development. Alternative 2, partial cloverleaf, and Alternative 4, preferred alternative, were both considered as proposed projects. They had similar design features except for the following modifications to Alternative 4: • Base Line Road would be widened slightly more on the southerly side; • The Northbound Loop entrance ramp would be replaced by Eastbound dual left turn lanes to the Northbound Interstate 15 freeway; • The Diamond entrance ramp would be widened to receive dual left turns from Eastbound Base Line Road left lanes; • The Northbound exit ramp that utilizes existing East Avenue undercrossing bridge would need to be widened to accommodate the two lane exit; and Two new bridges and one widened bridge would be required to be constructed. Alternative 4 was developed and selected as the preferred alternative for the Proposed Project because it met the purpose and need for the Interchange improvements and it eliminated the need for the acquisition of commercial buildings and the acquisition and relocation of fourteen (14) businesses in the southeast quadrant of the Interchange. General Plan and Specific Plan Compliance Base Line Road is currently a four-lane roadway within the proposed Project limits. Because of recent and future planned housing, retail and commercial developments in the cities, improvements to Base Line Road and the Interstate 15 Interchange are necessary to accommodate population growth and the resulting increase in traffic demands. The Cities of Rancho Cucamonga's and Fontana's Circulation Elements of their respective General Plans specify that Base Line Road is intended to be a six to eight lane major highway or arterial within the proposed Project limits, and is intended to provide efficient high volume traffic flow within their Cities and the region. The proposed Project conforms to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Circulation Elements of its General Plan, General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require that Base Line Road be a six-lane Major Divided Highway within the proposed Project limits. Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently improved with four lanes within the proposed Project limits. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan specifies that six lanes within the proposed Project limits are sufficient to meet local and regional circulations needs for future growth. Lopez Resolution No. 13-055 - Page 3 of 7 P517 The proposed Project also conforms to the City of Fontana's Circulation Elements of its General Plan and West End Specific Plan, which identifies Baseline Avenue as a major east-west highway, which can accommodate six to eight lanes of travel and allowing for raised medians. Baseline Avenue in the City of Fontana is currently improved with six lanes from Citrus Avenue to Interstate 15. The City of Fontana's General Plan specifies that within the proposed Project limits, it is recommended that arterial segments that are located between freeway ramps and the next parallel facility, on either side of the freeway, such as Baseline Avenue at Interstate 15, be planned with an additional lane in each direction beyond its designated functional classification. These lanes will function as "auxiliary lanes" for more freeway access capacity and more efficient traffic flow between the ramps and the adjacent intersections and can serve as dedicated right turn lanes at the next intersection. Section 5. As a proposed discretionary action by a local agency, the proposed Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. ("CEQA.") Further, because the proposed Project will be partially funded by the Federal Government, it is subject to the National Environmental Policy Act NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c) ("NEPA.") Accordingly, the proposed Project was subject to both federal and state environmental review. Caltrans was the designated lead agency under the current Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") and Caltrans' stewardship program. Therefore, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 327, Caltrans was tasked with being the lead agency for CEQA and NEPA compliance and for providing full over-sight on the planning, design and right-of-way acquisition for the proposed Project. As the lead agency for the proposed Project, Caltrans commissioned the preparation of an Initial Study along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") as required under CEQA, and an Environmental Assessment along with Finding of No Significant Impacts ("EA/FONSI") as required under NEPA. Caltrans studied and analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project to identify potentially significant impacts to the environment and to identify the most feasible alternative that would accomplish the basic project objectives while lessening or eliminating any potentially significant project impacts to the environment. Pursuant to the requirements under CEQA and NEPA, checklists were utilized in order to identify physical, biological, social and economic factors that might be affected by the proposed Project. In many cases, background studies performed in connection with the proposed Project indicated no impacts under CEQA and NEPA. The following factors were identified as having less than significant impact and were studied further for the purposes of the proposed Project: Visual/Aesthetics Review, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, Air Quality, NPDES/Water Quality, and Noise. Visual/Aesthetics Review For visual and aesthetics' review, compliance with CEQA requires, at a minimum, that a Scenic Resource Evaluation be conducted. Under NEPA, a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) is required to assess visual impacts of the proposed Project. A VIA, dated February 2011, was prepared as part of the proposed Project to satisfy the requirements of both CEQA and NEPA. Lopez Resolution No. 13-055 - Page 4 of 7 P518 The VIA assessed the potential visual impacts and analyzed any potential changes of views of or from Interstate 15 and Base Line Road by the proposed Project. After performing extensive study and review, the VIA discussed the impacts of the proposed alternatives and made recommendations that certain measures be implemented in order to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse visual impacts. The measures recommended in the VIA have been considered as part of the design and construction of the proposed Project. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials An Initial Site Assessment (ISA) dated March 2007 along with a Supplemental Initial Site Assessment dated March 2011 (SISA) were prepared in order to assess the potential for hazardous waste and materials as part of the proposed Project. After having performed assessments, further study and multiple testing to determine the nature and extent of the potential for hazardous waste and materials within the proposed Project limits, certain handling recommendations were made in order to address Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) and asbestos containing materials (AGMs). In addition, a Limited Site Investigation was conducted to test for herbicides, pesticides, and metals associated with the applications of herbicides and pesticides during the operation of a former nursery within the proposed Project limits, there were no recommendations for further investigations of this former agricultural site. Air Quality and NPDESMater Quality An Air Quality Analysis, dated February 2011, was prepared to review potential air quality issues associated with the proposed Project, and a storm water data report was prepared and approved by Caltrans on June 1, 2011 to consider water quality impacts of the proposed Project. Based on the findings of the analysis and report, no mitigation measures were needed for Air Quality and NPDES/water quality impacts as part of the proposed Project. Noise A Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) was prepared and approved on both March 4, 2011 and March 8, 2011. Based on the NADIR, when compared with Alternative 1-no build alternative, the noise levels of Alternatives 2 and 4 were expected to only increase by no more than 3dBA. Therefore, this increase in noise would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, sound barriers were not recommended for Alternative 4 under CEQA and NEPA standards. However, Caltrans requested, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga committed to the construction of a sound barrier (SB No. 4) at a height of approximately 14 feet adjacent to the off-ramp in the Northwest quadrant of the Interchange within the proposed Project limits. The purpose of which was to address potential noise impacts to the residences in the adjacent subdivision associated with the new location of the off-ramp in the northwest quadrant of the Interchange. Additional NEPA Requirements In addition to the above matters, NEPA also required consideration of Title VI, Independent Utility/Logical Termini and Environmental Justice. Lopez Resolution No. 13-055 - Page 5 of 7 P519 Mitigation Requirements under CEQA and NEPA The proposed Project would have no significantly adverse effect on natural communities or wetlands or other waters within the proposed Project limits, because the following mitigation measures were required to reduce the potential effects to insignificance: • Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board; • Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game; • United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 14; and • Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination. The Air Quality Conformity Analysis Determination letter was issued by FHWA (Federal Highway Commission) on June 15, 2011. With regard to the remaining mitigation measures, there was the option of either purchasing mitigation credits from an off-site mitigation bank or participation in an in-lieu fee program; however, final determination would be made by the applicable resource agency. Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Finding of No Significant Impacts The Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Finding of No Significant Impacts along with the mitigation requirements previously identified, were approved on September 30, 2011. The Notices of Availability were distributed to federal, state, regional and local agencies, and certain elected officials and property owners and were published in the appropriate publications on September 30, 2011. There have been no challenges to the IS/MND and EA/FONSI. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The property described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto is necessary for the proposed Project; D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owners of record. Section 7. The City has complied with the notice requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. Section 8. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council on May 1, 2013, which includes the Staff Report dated May 1, Lopez Resolution No. 13-055 - Page 6 of 7 P520 2013 and all documents referenced therein, including the environmental documents referenced above, and any testimony, records, and documents produced at the hearing, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 9. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney's office and staff to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. Lopez Resolution No. 13-055 - Page 7 of 7 P521 EXHIBIT A P522 EXHIBIT "A" 22596-1 THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF LOT 54 OF TRACT NO. 16776, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED IN BOOK 320, PAGES 95 THROUGH 100, OF TRACT MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTH 31°31'39" WEST 11.79 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, CONCENTRIC WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1270.91 FEET TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 10°31' 49" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 83.14 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 044'54"TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTH 00 003'38" EAST 11.08 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT, BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1259.91 FEET,TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 6 050'27"WEST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 76.90 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 029'50"TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 880 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS-OF- WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD IF ANY. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM(NAD83),ZONE 5, 1992.88 EPOCH. DIVIDE ALL DISTANCES BY 0.99992483 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AND SLR L F XICOTEN CATL �O - E. 70 SALAZAR XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 NO. 5507 LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 *sTEXP. 9-30-14 \Pr qTF OF cpx\FOB P523 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL 22596-2 THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF A FREEWAY AND THE GRANTOR HEREBY RELEASES AND RELINQUISHES TO THE GRANTEE ANY AND ALL ABUTTER'S RIGHTS, INCLUDING ACCESS RIGHTS APPURTENANT TO GRANTOR'S REMAINING PROPERTY, OVER AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF LOT 54 OF TRACT NO. 16776, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FILE IN BOOK 320, PAGES 95 THROUGH 100 OF TRACT MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT DISTANT THEREON NORTH 31°31'39" WEST 11.79 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, CONCENTRIC WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1270.91 FEET TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 10°31' 49" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 83.14 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 044'54"TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 00 003'38" WEST 66.27 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD83), ZONE 5, 1992.88 EPOCH. DIVIDE ALL DISTANCES BY 0.99992483 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AND SGP f[� ((J((!v� ��_ Ivy• G F C�XICOTENCATL o � E. A XICOTENCATL E. SALAZAR, PLS 5507 SALAZAR LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2014 NO. 5507 EXP. 9-30-14 ST �P 9TF OF 0 08- SBd - 15-PM 6.6-22596 (22596-2) P524 EXHIBIT B P525 ypR , M„ZZ,b0.00N ,7AN,YAV LEVV 3 J � Q � n o 7 o U Q o I Q Z N On �O Q W Q Lm 4 W J Q O p O Z x 4, in 3J/1 n Ln V m O z r U-) Z Lo� II Lo N Ld Q - Z U N N ¢ 00 H n ¢ EE o z w r- M_8E,C'O.00N ,bb'09 � - -- ,90'll M„82,N.00N CO rn F_- U` p °° rn o co rn a rn J X } U Q rn r o p r- ¢ M Z ¢ n co Of � W Q d J m 2 O II J w n z J a ¢ ° 1- `o O a ° a `n U n o m N Q M„8C,FO.00N bb'09 0 p 0 M„K,2O.00N "a ° F- ” q a C • 3 W d o rn rn N U) c^o °o II N o 0 N � .- � m � N 11 OD_ T W J ¢ II z rn ¢ ~o z o .�- N o CN < m W Q 1 m ~ n o y9 Ilk o L F L� O J P526 OR s. b Q N j o U Q oo Q Z N NM Q W W J Nm ° M„ZZ,b0.00N O < (5 ° ZDN,7AV CLEW °mss X w S� Ln Ln W N in � r7 in Lr) d N rn N O z Z O u ~ ' W J a U U v U) W m J r Q � m W d rn J n ^ - X } o ao rn W Z wz � rn Q w °0 rn a � Q00 a :2rn 3 n p C LM 00 or , U W :2 M Q a '00 a CD CD O ° z a F- M M„8C,C0.00N 44'09 U M„K,C0.00N I j M„K,FO.00N w `1 ,LZ'99 o o z (n o, Ln rn a � q u� r Ln 6 of `m�o d 1. n N r- (D H O M C O M IJ 2' 0 C) 00 11 la L J 11 11 W w o ) Z Ckf RP mo 3 m d o (� F z t}l 0 J -- - .;.. t Jit * ili. iii.• e .„.c, asre_.0?• -.2:7 . ..... , ... 1 .... a) 3 ._ , ,- u) ri• al a) :• 0 , . .mo 1.1 R(:) uShi C 0_. r . 11 t. ' - ,..k:- cr ,,,,..,... , ... ..,... 0 2 .'-- cco rm z 13) • , , 4. 11 = ,:rtic „ t., • _• CD ...v. .. L—• ..1 CD -.= ii,...s 0 - CD (-Q 0 . Itl (II) i■• 1"i c.. .2„. ..• (i) (11) '.irf,.,'• i■i• 0 •::...i: el• 0 r•I• 2) F:-,- CILti. 2 V. '3:-,:4,, • •••II ' 1 • • • • •*1b,�• 1,/ife l' N .' It ler. 'It. (0, ,,,p)z.,;:' .- i 1 ,4411( ,-, : ;s r �' �j ,fit, . , 1 co = ... , .. ,,, ..,.• , ,,, .. : \ /, .•. , .. ??, / . . . . : .A:4 i i \ . , „ 41. 0 O . *•`R., A\ -1 ./ %/' \ ; y /if 1' �i i . ‘,,, . ,, .(.. \'‘\\,1\ l'' .... ii..44f.' ►�/ . c ' 4 ,,,.. .../ 3 to ... • ...- ,- i iii y' '` i /-,:.,.) .e, -., - -. • . ..: 4\y co . . . :K..,IV ••■• /4440 :".. •/ • ,/,. 7.. / .1t., .. 'or e 4 l' '" / ► / • ,iy,�� / K / 1 iii ri 1 . G.'&41k#•. , •• A • .,, , a .,..:- „:„..,zi, ,,,, , i '„ :. : • , 4,,,,•,.. .....„. ... ... ,, .. /. ,. . ,�. /1. • ,. , �,. ., l !1 '1 J' '/ /,' mil ,.• •.�r • 1, +•r` 'F ..y . ;,i i, �." 11.)p� , . :4114't \ 0 n CO D v,) p r 0 cDD = C w r H 5- Q, CD Cn CD CT = CD CD ii, , CD CD 0 0 O Cn 3' C 73 n n- CI O CD' O r O C)• Z = D ° Q W Cn O C O O -0 pa r+ a C �D tit. —. -0 - 1 3 O Z O CD °-+ - � CD D Q CD AQ : n OO . ‘G v CD �CD `G � CD �' � V� 5' O ' �CD O O � CD fl CD .e D Atr z CD D) n CD C CD r+ = C 0 = h 0 CD D �'sl)-' CQ -. CO. 0 ,--� CD CD CD C L.G - N n cn Cam) % a � CD CI di: ;' � Q 2.' (D * CD �G m £ ,.r. It = CD ,--r O O CCDD O 0 Q CD } 1 St t 0:11i • • • • > XJ 7 4sit".:,,,_ 3 V' SD la) cD _ a) 3 M' M' N - - _ CD = O it -' rila CD I O r �. C w —I . Lo "w 0 Cl) � If o 70 1 r ,..h n M m • v -• r Cl) � c� co - 0 I CO 0 t su Q. O i Os O 0 — ■ , N Q ' _ O 2 w -*: W 0 N Mt CO 0 �• CO , —• N d yob ire(::. M mo 'I r ci) sit:tt 17:01). N Mil a It n U) O_ es m N 3 m r — 0 ; N r p —' —. �D N mo N Owls 2) CD rilla p g- O 3 33 0 D r n W - N Q _ X 0 `< n h .t . : � O o � -• om Cl)M t Cl) . y - , _ - . CD a m ( � N —• cD O < II * 3 < _ co (D • • / •=17 —• rf Q k 3 —. ID y mie :' c∎ v) a US n C C) Cin <: U) z=vP - N tic At. ter. •e 10.0 .40 4411fr �r . 17 2 iv 1:b VI .i t at . x +'1� y Yt fir, • min. 4ir _ : ,. .� ,�%it!. .' as,Alktr,, _,.. . 7,11esil_ ,. it L., _ . 0 . --, , _ . • • in 0, f ■ - MEN• '--) • ,1/4 .. r L - (1:1 — ... % _ , ta....: ._ 0 1;"`"A.,_, .r__ _,.... ..: _ .. __, .." .I.... , ,, ., t... .i ., I■M < i L4'rtin r Z , lifilla ■ ,. . ..'•in, ' .,'. t 1-- . ,i_. Cil) ■ii. , ii174, 3#7;-,44. .. . - .. I< - 41,7■1!r_s itrici,00.' . , ( .ik.„, v. 2. _ . ; .ii., .1i-4 _.4- 11..._..., ;1.1,3`.1ri. ,..--....:. . .-: Cl) ,Iiiii,Va...0 Cn .4 N : ti c f - -• 41g, 1 --- ,,, liE.i it 1 M1, -¢ ` ' y.� i -+rte i:rj x, . • t � . 1 I,n � _; t, i '• ,. � �y.r�, •pi � a ` . f ry I , � � J ` s .� c J / f . • ' i' ' / ' / ! ;' J ' \7 I," IP.1:e . 0 1 . ..„,wit,... 4P111°: : v, h.. (" _ f.% ,.&,.... ,s\-, ••••• / t.41 .:, ',\ ' , ,... i , -4e- 0 -. &,N,• ..: , tv.''' \ ',/' ' ' s. • i9e4/1/ -- k' *. '. a) ..,, . ,k 0- .7... ,-4 • ■ \, \ ..,.. ••- -• N'''e..', .ts■ 7 f.''A\ '.'' -14.'---4.--.,' ..il,"/°. l., 0 .". / 4,1/ \\\■\--\ A '' /,',// '-'''' \ H ' Nilir‘' Cn OD �f � ` , \ i , r, J .. al ./ ., •..„.,.,. k.„ _,,, ,.,„,... , y M , • .:;... - ...., ...,..,•,.,.,/.. !.... • ...„.-....A •. ',..".ii„.- •Ki; t, ,\,;:. . i /,...‘---‘ . ' A \ .,, .> 4iv/..,..\\ ,,; , ..., 1 , /17 4s, ..— ,e,„ "401 )II°1 • 0 ?a. ..../\(...e,: .,,,,, /-,...,,,i \ ,, ,,. . .lki !,,y r j , . i •} i�M ./ ', . , , . . .m < . ,, , ,FJ * � I f > II< . -, J �; f'� - CI) • � ''*b..: , `�,� 1 . � .F ,.,may �.�. , \ is.••••• — • % i'4% , . . ,46,,,, .cke 1------ **4- I 11. ills,. 404,x► P. k `. 51160 10.1C SEVeta .;v 412 i 4 % 0 -. : i'fi � p ill CD ,,,,, *y...,,,, ._ .. 1,1„1,4„, 1 0 /.. - ____< lit-- °,t4 -, ,4-It Illi -r: Ai AI ,^,,,f4\ 4i11 . 1 11 ili iN, ,.\, ,ap i 3,. ____._.._. \i, ,i. 11. , \„ _ —• „.... Nk -:.,....... ,:v' -', N,-,p--,,\ tig - ..1'11 1 ,,\',,11 0.-ie-('-..l'‘■,-,N . V-h, 4\''',P,,, \,..,\ Itt‘ 'hi i �� 0` tea ... LC1 t,,,,„ " > :,.,c,,,,,,,,: - *•'.' \, Z 11t nn■ .. M ;1.-----:—.. 1 Ii*Iik\'■''N'.:*".=,,„illkii 14 110#1WkNi - —11 .I co ,,. 1 it '.7 \s ' ..---'\4411'4,0qt-4k, .1. 1 \\ / '' \ . \.eft, 0„ o ra la<..... .... -..‹...,_„411.„..„.,.==.:T1 ..,, .;:,:s- ,,.,:,\ -Wiliok... , . (i)....,--.'..:. "1...---=:-".ZiNlill Ilifik: :::1/4.:- A.,.'.:\'4\.-. ks' s'Ait,YiI I al 'IMP \ ��\ k !! 1 it tu it.1.0:4:;,,4:„._ i.„t.,� of f# !1 4 �Irrn • :' E. a f '!e' ` '7• 4, , ,... i t.PIP, ... *a ie 1 A „,,,, CP . „,k,,,\ ..,/,,,,,,,, .., ,;,,.\\, ...,„,,is, ,,''' , ''.,-.1 ,t! . . 4 . ,,...:: ,, cco , :„.•_„... . ..,„,,,„„.\ : , ',.::, =..1„, _._....,•• :- ,;- ....,,,,.,:...yf , ,:• , ,, ,,,,, .., ”.r .. ., •. 0 ,,„L ,..,. i.M )1:0 4,--.,4, . w4r. , ..'', ),•;.' . - , \.-1- '-'-!:. •" \\*, -g, ,,. : •- -- • ,s • i ' qi-.., . • - ,,,,,,, '-,-• /-, - \t.• 47/4,0r. -, - (C2/Ap ' \ 5' `r � ....,....:,,,,N, ,),.. :,/,..,f . . )14.2111 • � .' Iii �'. �� \\ /'✓ ,. .i, -.• ,,,,... )//f -/al 1.1. . ..., 3 ..• . , ../..,.....,,,,. .,, ... , ., ,, w < . .. .... ,..„..., .. .„ , ..,..,., . :.... ,.: ././.4.„. .....„,, p ..... ‘• Ar 21) :,..i.4?",':, .• /V/ 1111, ,.` i 1' /lei/ 40,,n ‘,. ' .., '' ' / I< ,,_ . - ,• ,-,.?,, ,..--- • ,,- Ili . 1.i ,f..!. /s .,.•, ).-. ,V, ,./ , . ' ,..7-- /I.. /".;,.; .:',4‘,s'..' 'i'll 1.$ -; //4rs r_ -.-4- ., .. cn C / `'1 I '°i ` \ i ' A '' '' �� IM.„ \-I 1, r. :.,.,..,p * e, ,4 a h 4P L` y' J .- a_ - , / 4 ,1' ; / 7 Cn m' stay 0 0 0 ESTER PL - i 4 mop 30 • \ C C ;0' Zm 1` 1 -0 0-I a a 1 0„ A -71 - Z —. _ as j:� � I � m Z h ti .Al o rill i \ \ �I�II °C'IP r\j I raS,I.171t I : $_ _ _ Li v rl EAST` ‘< ,}LL __■. A HJ 'k\V ' In:Li)I r �\ I I agr , ::t.iii D 11.1 to ^ -. Cm ^^ N \ sL' I n I Li) Pr; nit :;, I 1 O 0 .1 m c: "''` 0 y♦ W Z -I a ;, • - 0 ON 4 I 4 0 1 M W UUU h.. ...----": HOhN.• ) 6 AY K ,Nb-L ''0't'!P •-_,, ,t ,:1-s ... .3 c ,--,-:,:.1-rd• c c „ IN ".": ro -4 f•-■A "-- Pel„,, NI n 1 1.4 vj--• ,,,,, 1- : . ,,,, •,,,, C ✓: '4 C•\';a1 1' I ?1,>' ITC IC1 2° 1'■ (1 'EA ;41w-, CI ''...A '',°,':-. °T. I\ .. ,, c :: co r. — •,, I go Z.c•0 , (_ Cr, ‘.4 2 - ■ =:, , . l0 0'n N. 0 n • L'I 4., 2 . r.: ,.., E-,- ,, i, ul 1-, - ,. t‘ c.t.=an- 2 rT, ul , 0,...— ,,,,, su -Jo—, ,,, , (-; - 2 ai C- cc, 0 r., ■ VI Nj Z,j I- •-,-64 nj 1,..1 • 0 X , XII - v• R Ln, , v, ,-,- ...• \- ,, 01 4, Fj F 0 W4, 7 ( ( 1 t \ .l.... c4 C. -.L.; ' -'1■4 V -8''cj 0•.: 'CO -1; ._. I 1 1 ,-.-- cr; Ii ILO I • I rr: I ' '1 ‘ I I I • •,, R/11 • 84.78 Lt ; I 4- 373+07.12 SO0'403.-1.7•E 407.8i' 1,- iv in.' ' \ • - ■7...,83.3.4"et'73'-- - -. 3.42' F7:183t.' °' \ /1 % -.111.180111446k \...„ --. , k r- 11111101 13— ■„. .. — ci. „..”-"IP... • ' ,...- 4, ,,. 3 ._. Iso , w•3•. I -i Et) * . ... .7:1° 0:. o ,••Int = 1.•,.. 6 .o - —_, . cri. •,.., N \ i-r / SP 1-L 22 ■.:7, 1' 0 IN) •..1. iliblialk --------1- 1 6 1/44 mt ; -0 _ , r,a3., .. 4 ,..0 -C...,'s •'1 1:1, 0 ': %.Li■Pc1-c-:' ..'‘:7Wmum,. 7 / \ _ ■.I. \ a, c; -ti 1 tii' IOW' E '0 13 tel,” ::: 1,4' '-/=, V.,, .4' ..4,,,'• p,*-1. 4. I - '-; ,N :.• I - , m .... , ai) 4 , ,-, , .p , .. , ,.,,, 1\\k _--- '-a', l' 1:11 QM ',-.-. -I; -- o-, '11 -0 w••••• I - .,,,, II. i - '": ,°, *C", ',',. ■..n • Cn - o- • -.•. oo L.,- ,.,: • v o I...Z.,' ••..., IQ ,.•- •-•-. ci T:" ,., 0.3 ,_.t - i.' -. I\., I - `-•: - ..\11,..,, ---,_ fi';7.: t*,•.. 4, Q., ,.. ,?,, . a ,. ,„ ,... - ,:.. ..., ..,.. 360.3„. ., . ., . .... -,8 ,„, ,...,..... .....- ... . , .,t.... tv 0 ,.,,,. ....2,... 7 .. 7. ,,,. ...,..-. ,,, '"" 6 r: r_ . . !•,,.. "---.:. • -_ ----" . . • • .N,,,,, _. ,,,,d p, di //// s a Mil% soVI6V2-2:-C—A6P--- 1 A ci 4 II.1114°A r Ilt _ - l'5"-- V noo° 2"w -': ...., „L.,:. 7.1>. 248.59' 50°422 EC., %T: --1";':;•`;..%-. • 500°04'22"E :-..* .-,.. `-cx Ls t RAY . 2i8. . ,....„:'51ESAtRCP+1; FD NOTF N 00°04'22 ri 2498.28 '(SURV.IN 0004'22"fi 484.93' •°°' I 2 500°0422E 519.22'3 4 "E" LINE 385 EAST AVE cr, .St --, -4,...1 .s—mmomak, (1111) 1 • Ar\IIIIiiI IN ' I ; •NYt _ n Ii" �I v u17 1 • . . 1 \ m ----I m m •AA r\ m 73 -x N n Z. O0 (♦■ �N m I 1 z m o. CC) NI1 � ldWi �► F- lo 0 r 1 =r1 1S 3 �s loyal (i N -; n 13:NS o�N\ / - > Aa M�5' co s1 / nm O C` ti n�u =c o OJw - ri O LA Nai y- 0.00a l72 t v N Exist CITY R/W �� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \t STATE R/W 'I Qya 9� r ' w w o C° l„ 21111 Zr D _.c. l!,Z t!, D .ii m in op �inxx 0 11111< °oa (-4 oa m�OC) + 0 '-CO N � + •w aNViT� N I. IVC Co Lo O m cnTmz U W L N M O O•O b S (111:11 Or- O A to o v _4.m 0 CL M N CO U# rp U 0 m m N 3 + w O A co n • m A �w Cn N m • N O p�� sn -1. +� T9�D7 b • 1 -' * _ C� (1'4 = O m 0 Co m+ m D D I- c ti a 0 Mitt t— N N � r X Z '— _° o wUa yt0 M K T b a ,° 0 X Do-1 Mt COA r' CO s00°04'22'E I- 97.14' Z N Exist R/W rn N V1 `D 8 o 9 D C„.• .0 s • ,r L.zF n , . , 1 9N ^ N. d ?g° iii coo \ 09 ;So3 0 . . - n cnn rt __ \ r r� . In _ W o w N' ) . • m 2 m n o• 1- 1., Ai , '. O• + 0 33 n.) w ( C -. r-co a * — — -rn P�� O m ap ' Ifr-o co w la m CD Co + m o - z . _ m 31 0 Co a o 'O 1 CO f!i 0 n°, In I _Pi -f o I' ti b lm n Am°°eg—m \ -F▪ m m c)c o m m I;1,7 3:>wlw— `" cn ro I a— w O tlm— f m J �� N 0 N I l\.1 mI'n 72 NN r—ti'— N ■ n o N pNi C 1 * . mN o IA— N Ir r A A "0 li< N/gS. r O Lrr_ \ r CA L4 CD r L51 / w _. Lo CIA) I'on, / O (11) i .. D n, NI A\ 3v I � � ° m Q N J N y N k � N O I __ c.1 a � m Q 3 AI„ � "'c• c N - do I � w� W anN. G cn •J !:, , O I 4 � r Dm \V • N O AI °' LA CD Co W C °1 � * ` W m I J vm • N ° l mw "' l N gaa I Naz I — m O S I o `' IN\I III ~t• I 5, r !d a L 5 4 L48 ti I. r r a a cco m G 8 1200.00 9 o 00 _v I co o I 0 it, 0 n 4 4. -0 W m CT = 5 Q m m CD CD m 0 0 0 cn n' D -0 CD� � � � � � oro 5' Zt7 Novi � o �' � ' CD = a) '` o m 2. —1. �' -0 - 1 3 m z o a . CCD 0 CD 1\3 Do CC • CCDD N m CCDD 0' - N ; v m iv � `� 3 N . Co ,� D f=1 5' o a 0 , moo '< n- . cn 7' mm � SvCD <• � � = cn n ' CD o SD 0 m O ¢' = (71-) m 3 5 m sv. ° CD ?. 0) m �' _ M m ,� m m m � � C CCDD C Cn n `< - n cD aTI= Q n m m a' o —• W `G + =' m :.m CO -1., o n on Q 5- zDi m r CD ,1. o = m o- 0 m 0 Q 3 u) m r+ .. f Vy u-0q. L - 9 b L 000Md L - 9 b L 000Med R/W PROJECT SURVEYOR!RUEL DEL CASTILLO DATE REVISIONS BY v U m v Na NNNNNNNNNNNN D NNNNNNNNNNNNN ➢ NNNNNNNNN a NN 'A NNNNNNNNNNNN 'A NNNNNNNNNNN 'A NNNNNNNNN 0101 " 00m0101 m oommmmd01000010 mm Wuum0001 0 mm r 000 000 oo ommm r minmmm-I�wmmmmm .n �o r - WNNN--Ob�A M CRN-OtomnaL NN -Imm0-4-�-imm N p WN�WN-N - N� O N IAN- Z -N-UN-N P N N N N m En I*1 m m Cl m m -1 ti -I -1 0 p W N non AAA titi none CLI0002c on000 nonnnonrr ➢➢ ===>>>n m=1=1=1=1 0 0>0 D 2- 0 K K 0 0(0 y y C 0> >0 0 KM DDDnnnNN KKK.< AAZanym mmm KKnn;;-,AA nnn 000TTT0o n Nm0 as 0 >na AAmm n KKA ono---aa0000 a NZN:tia00ONDn 'Z' o0`•ZCOONN '0 002 AAA nnn OO mmmm Z mm0�0nammmNNN ZOV1NN00 0 nnn 9.TT Tmmm mmn . ONa 0000 0A00«<mm n0 222 mm0000 0 mm 0-,N ➢nnnn 0 nn nnn nnnn O KM a an>nnna:zzzz A nna LIZn zznan = zz yy-ir a mm AAA OOD AAtititi-1 rrrAmOZ nn-Ititi 00mm00000 Lao 000 >>>>>> O 0 0 m m➢ 2 2 m m m S m m z a a ZZZZ w0,,°,7 OONNN 00-1-1 A A A a D D A A D D D D -p'+ D➢m m m 22Zaa n0-, nn ZZZ 00 titi-1-1-1 000-0-0 AWf nnnnn nnmW➢n mm Aa > nD na rrm MM ➢Lnz KM MK titi 00 00 MM NN '-A no no = DD nD mm r J LA Z SHELBY PL In m N 0 V/ mi — — am > Z 2 0 co"– n co nn enZ T > I ti C A ••-ESTER PL Z 0 pm, o Co) nn a� 1` nn 1 E0 \ C_A O n W n-e om Q n� Z� C 171 a o° s _ Cm oz n Z 0 r z a Z 070 ° = r =" a s 53 0 aZ I _, Z o� Z � � 0 `\ w o Z ,3 \\* III \ 0 0 n = n 0 to 1 n -±ii, _A 1 M Da n - Z EAST AVEN �. ��� EASE` AVENUE' 1 z ii. \ s ,I .1 / n I n 00 0 CI - m I C^— Z _ M y 0 J C A \` IF \\ 1\1 \/J b. rt + Z 3 o z 0� m 0= > > am as Z o m , III 0 00— z o 70 z a =z z \a a I 1� „ � °9 0 ea y. n \, \ ,'2 Omv2 I o In nm I o >0 0 C m N an PI - o m o 0 in z � � * m N ° il Cm SA I Z 30 _ a m oa Ma zry 0o° • 1 =4p 00C � 3 Z o E, O O a 0 PEG/5/ y t N aX � 00 ^ 3° % o a z Zr _ RW000146 - 1 RW000146 - 1 - 9 - , L000M z - 917 i. 000MH R/W PROJECT SURVEYOR: RUEL DE CASTILLO DATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY - - - - - - NNNNNNNNN , ��� EPIWANDA AVE. N N N N N N N N N Q1 I"'m P N m m m m m m m > c r°rn 352+63.82 1 I I 1 I 1 m1 I N I N m m N m-0 Ot tmlr D W N n p tl�L W N r o v 2 0 W r m Z Z o Z W m m y # o mn r - aw W ?N N N N N NN N O m�'^^ V m I l0 W m N- m W-w p Z -I r- 73.ananama TOr- 01O1 C o 00 o VC -' r- 2 mH m m me O t0 0 to tD 0 to n tD 0 o ia d N 0001 Q _ D W 2 2 73 • nnn nn nnrr n*f m f m Nn , OS O Ri K n m v ° o ti v v m m y°E I CR crt Oo56n P.. 0000000000 ~ a O v2 b 334 N 10n 574°22 3 313 0.3 mmzz- n<7 ° ° ° W n ti o - acn Mnn<c�mm maa03-N °W n _o-o; -• L'' ° "° vv tom am -toa co {' 44..........F,-.F-3n n n f d t0 a m 10 O m 0 a PI ' ,I N. 0 0>> n°�01 v Z "'m a to o n'"=m nwi z m a+w N o m m 361+21.45 Q ' N b= - d m m m 1 n - " fTl r- 1 1 ° U o ccv„,-+, O c----::-:1-'o• O-I m n' m o❑ n r.' n a r w v 55NNor-rrr ■ z o - n (, m Iu F`_ ow ZZ,, a T a00.0c0, 0 1. Vr" car N x 2 n n n n O m a W m _, O fA 'A { D - O rt 1� / x w o wm°0 a 01 Nw e m aDo m q1, AN L0 N J_i D a ,n 73 � - -- SI 0°2'3'221.E 1' m a at m / �a a I a y.:.. e 4 n c - --- --_ o m �' 0 - _. -_ - - -- -__ . m w o 0 i 8 SHELBY PL 9 w - _- - N U 0 0, a m - a mo b N 0 C, , O xJ I N . 1'J 0 t� . u a BC • n v " 364+36.83 z m Z /A C3 x _ ,°o D m C N 21 .1-3 ' �W'z •O mm.. ..mama Z - Z v v n n v K V< rn z v m-m L w I n N N?m? D D 1 C co. O) ^ n n n ---I l l CD --,3 z * P m ZZ < < N ca oN :;' X O T 41 P n n 77 b w O 1� 0 vi in 01 Z m . n Xi . Z Z G7 - b .. Z i _ L L _ Z r 3> X O Z Qo r. FORESTER PL • ° - 2 N00°02'56"W 'ia CP 11-7.97' 10 .E/NI 57.64 .. • • 1- h 0 m • . 3 x , n sy m - co w N ^ Z ' \s& ^.. .. �� •" _ pt'A (� F,i -C.1 1Nw-1v �/`� O-.-imrsynn m2 _ .- M4 / N • ` tONt� '--I { �'� tD O V■ "F1' >m$$>>H 0 <n m_ •\ m Z•,} m`d ClT I:I� �' m ' POo iio3'° $mcnig 2 111.0 3.0 Co M m o.. -. �, mm�, OJ '- m °-r. r�II O ^n a m 1 1 O Z 2• • J y VZ m a p N m O m n m v ~ A.• c 1P ♦m I — .0 v _ 2.. O r C O.. N .o t4 0. 'O w (� m z m ?.c v a+2 .r CO ti R v g-. �o 9. g= O °> . ti o''% - m (ice m a m o a ro 'S1 vn f / 0 '/ C o �� Wpm a E Ost0 Ot00�� N N __1V-\�/•40 k ipgpn°+u+Sg a - gin an CI` - O •i.l tanmaga3nn ,1 0+ Otn2 e - ITL / 'g2, 2, -� I € m i v� A` O m0�nao �o S r1 Q_m C Y - man !.:4,'-„,N o 492 '.�_ �A b,7 II! om u�� m G n•m n i r li "n _. � 000p m n •°m w'nrooi � p N V› Vo. ' ... ownc -4 �0•m z o m $o' mg�mg°�9 Z 6 W ?msoSm `y° No No -+ 01n• x .Y 7.°-t •. ,r' N v~+, GI III °, o O 0 go .203 o . �g. 2- In w w Cll e ,,,..,..,4„., j xLn ITI _� Dry H �1 00 l7 vtm A uN N n � �" zm 1 m a 1v mmm -17 �'S0 f \- rT r, _ ,, in W m o+ to Z I Al ` , 1 {111:r, `C7 m- - O O ,,n0 ? -. ro -- m MEEl m6 ›rp 9,,q'S. �_� N�m o at-..+ _.•a I J N 11+i.�^ T,7',;-; ,�y� SO ry7 V „� f m" W " N XO A by b /� 77 C� _ _ 03 o ITl N00•05'34-E oo' t® `l,`!- v; m o N `a ny 4 4 03 `I1 71.04' Ri n`"i. EXIST CI'r RW Gi _ -1 m - c. m �• Iy3�"9 y ... EXIST:STA7 RW Sr• '•-''.•I- Z o Lo ,m'n of °p y�yy `-3 X 4=1 507°57'20"E lR , r.50 W IRl o °' _ : W`^ y O."�+d - - f 804'S8"213"E I R o f • y a o Ict N f i O yx A ry=c >to> O ran T ►rf 7'C� an m top m u+ -.. y r▪ O� d o 1 , ,r f ZZ- - m i a A yy O O Exi Ll 11„'� vlz .371-7.3 ,0o m Q\ 171 y V[i sy Prof. 5 oa- m �t° �zz w N z m 2 '. I� ' .0N Od mm00 + coca J •O # p m lJ 2 ...:,�i Miq°54.50£ I 0". 3 O m� 0 M0 R m• c r ,.S.�W 1 o 0p S`' mo EC • m N ° 374+68.64 Co CL OF EAST AVE m PI w 380+19.79 SEE SHEET RW 000146-3 RW000146 - 2 RW000146 - 2 • — 917 OOOM =I — 917 L 000M I R/W PROJECT SURVEYOR: RUEL DE CASTILLO DATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY OATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY - - , - - - - 12-12-12 ADDED EXISTING SEWER EASEMENT MT - - - - - - 02-1B-13 22592-3 (TCEI PARCEL REMOVED MT - - - - - - 02-18-13 ACCESS CONTROL ELIMINATED MT - - - - - - NN NNNNNNN NNN SEE MAP RW 000146-2 a $ mA2. m 1`1, ANp• N VI ON,ON,ON,ON.y a UU,U'N`- > v A m m -, Ci U� tn . m O,N 0t0m aA W l7 y N a ;71 C7 - ,'9 10 N N-- -i 1: m .`'•f r- �{ a a r a [-Ir ;vi .. (- N`"�c •z ( .1r Nt# m -. a �0 0 " m0 ^ n �+ °a Q mail, ' -. al "' °o a -( 1 A o m n°, 0� d n y v = Ul .? xtnr =I((^"' d -s 3N1� N . I' W _ . Ul �,to-, z 0 �(.1 mn,.'>E rrr N n m A ac n C,A F. n4;0 n 0 0c -4-Z L L a\m a u 0 �^ m N O O 2 N = m n U1` ON= O O s a -m y-01m nu, F a n o W -I o .-4 0 ,- •O ,o< 0 o \am O V233C m ri• 0 NN�<Z1-+-Q°«a.. N� A w - W y ° CPO mQ ry NO � ` �r zN0-asoOw ® + / !-\ "'y W '.`t°w - m`" 0,o mt°, • N� OJ- or- n.a W. mu -"Q v N 2 ( I.4 D DnO0 O2)21 W \ m o o __. w' vi O y m x o o a N m o 2 a m m m 1 1 3.40. °OO n n 60. 41,.. I •�ti■ z,o,ma xx n ro W ' ,,"AM' °° z 91 \*. mot. . ..• '' --' SOO*03"15"E o�a nn 373+47.'2 �2 � - 154.54" > ~L m 1 _ • ..r • r > s sa ' 73 _ \ A r 83. 'N"B" 433.42 A �.-O z � mxfio z 373+60.8' _ b -O ;11.,i En 1 s a , • N_.Urns I Or `./\ a �., ,i m Co 0 o O a �_e In a I i V 03 • —t- •ov+t. Ja lb "175 \ •� \ N . °' n o amr2x .. b N 03 ml , zi NmU , y s"` • O �_-Q - m m r^ \ 0` II m 4. s 'i 'A ANCO r m ',S7.-".4.,11..., 6Qai �o 0 .n •-u mw.,w� ,y \ J - ._. "- tri to i� A v •�z -o° z ~ � ° a+v+ •+N °vas 44 \ a v• m ti-1 ' m N w01W°v M v.. - z • is c° L_J .3'74+68.64 m °,wu,rn' v'�°'r `Sl^y \ j m VIN - tr U.,N,-1.0♦N-. V3'. V, New , 'v 0, i �_ o . ,o m ° `rd \ 1--1 ^•Nm ;of a_ 1j1 �' : , -a;_ 1i m \ _ 2 0 A N W N ° Q O 454.68, U1 mw• a l \ < Z .- -4 z I 45,,?0„e •m m r \ i1. CrA�)) I a) o-I n x m„ C22 175+.3.59 w ". N) il m -I ON 7 80 °� ' 9 v \ p ~ m. y• -N �� I c o 3 • mm C 4T r z °t0 NO `.0 1-,a • \ t U1 an to m m VI a +i. 2 ° r o - w- Om z ° m mA ma .I, Zan a a L0 "' r -4 2 A • mm m 00�� `�r', I Q m•-•mmammmcsa , cc,cccccrz� rn m U m my + (— —1 z y,y-l�r-i� -. 0<2,2!I L 9 43 n r a - j T y Oj a .. 1 b 1,N1 N p N N to N N C n c7 \ .M. U W O, W n m 4 �� m m N A z 2J m V,0 0 * = O O • ♦N W [,m o tl 6 n 6-c c T, a 4 iu, a m o i :...,g..\ •V' 1 V1•y,ZSSSS-00 • m w A w• 'O, ■ .- ' V _ N yNNti Ntn Z , ,1 > `-\ - to mri. --1• OK `Q W„ \ \ - m O 0 A rn --\ to u, m •m N -U -r 1 1 b,n -1 O O Z 2 f''I _ lA - u, _ - . N co. _, •c,-.' ■ N Z o00 , o E6t1 1 �ba r 0 • 00 M w o N r 9e1dTB"87 m ' ni D 8p m e m 1n cO D -1 -I ` 360.a' _ �- '••' k,. m a o I— a mo m /� N No to A4' 0 1 .N r + ,O i wlp. air N -. a • '••• UT Z T2t WO • �'' -• 2 N Y- 1�,i J' ,n�'ni x'•'.' u, .. 0 •--,,: 94.8 M \. . J 1►r v mCZ2w.. - CO' CO 500°04'22"E ['. J� 4i�I, . • 47 // c, V rf Qm O m m W v !.• uJ"~�w r Da .,.. a`^ -m.� •o� � ''_.: '..•�y�� 25� � is -°� z Leo . 248-59' SD°42`E'o° --mmy� 500°04 .961 �^ m , co rn p°o0 Exist R/W - ti`._m -.:' wN. xiSt RIW (R) PER PMB 98/B6-B7 • t^'a°. m m wA - 1 - .---N 00°04.22"M 208.19'(U) N 00°04'22°W 2498.28 'ISURV.)� 00°04'22 W 484,93 F -- NOTHING_ 80 I 2 s66°be'2C 5;9:22 ;E" LINE 385 iiiii:A.2R2c,-EED'' E,st - EAST AVEa ,.W D tYY 10 o ,I v / • nZ1 0 1.( j" o f m 1 ( Z : .. ©3� O z "m6 A 'zO * b O -"3-n �n ,,, \ ,D NCO `-1 - ! * X U-, ( • r •-1=!. "oo to „..Z D 2 Nc u o f1 zZ 11 o mo am��ugm D ' z �� '\12� tno ao 8° `o� a � 1.71•'11' �. n * pqn-- ? e m� z i \ 1 M° 'x.{ 1 GJ O a = z E7 \ , 1 1C,o ■ Col m r i — �gg D n a O!n a\ 2 y a .l g=,°+tm.:1'a Z .... w o" (\/ s \ 00.1 ' a z `"g�,r�ai �.. ° .!Mil is� o�z3 - N • ," " ��.4�Cy 2pn +,to na a a° °„.00 �. tl' N \ 1 _ I I 6 z) m t„ . \ 1 A xo \ _� �w ° �♦ a ° n x m - bo x`33°Ogg°3°•°° m om�:g� 2iOav�; n ”' • o 'QO tvi, '" N / Z ®0s' ® o r isi- PT °g P•3 p8 3 0 ° �o'- q'v xA�ntiro -1.7 g fiy� Gr qtr ` O� o o n+S °- g X_- o g °' °a ��o ov, tS ° yo z X-0Poo do. -1 _ t m o° C °,� °e $ ° O A v 9 f` n m s. P 1 a s •y D - J _ 'D ° 4, $° 3 ? °., O' xZOx=_, O '� `ti B°. v-,�`"- �\ O.� m tc o3 K g" IF"'.$$ - _v 0- '^,•, a ° �. l�. ro ,°a a ;° ➢ iO Io a^n"� r ,��4 & 4° � on'p`� 01 �Bi.`�°•• b Wino C0 �m nr `-° CO `? p ; �� vc, ° a2 Ra d F -w°2 .r1 a D 21 ,- It a -A,wb x •0 -� mA A - atntn•- °� f*1 = 3 0 0- n ° y 00 Of m2'ym0 t7 - W �-" ;b OA D b,0p V• m a m cy 2Axa0 \ .� T .!• w 02 \ `aa 1- O ICI a'•"n-i."n -( --1 ° 8S (',l` `n ?a m{ ,Z n O ti ? 02ma0'• VT ('i CG p,�, Or �nroi O N Z 'N s O - m L'"21�n2a .. m f TL C9 .P v \a o o m C O N n to ,� � rys?r2csz MATCH LINE STA 384+50 2'0 °��'1'ti�"y° �A o ° ? R� • a6 -' nnn z a o ni 73 -�.� b /v pp nar2is-,� W t„_ pZ °'Yj ° e,,, N_o � - o _ o N O •8 N ' "„ .O ►d /Fq lig"1 aa-. ,=.,a au, i o > 144 W C 1 2 m m 1" .0.0 F!q M� � m�,2cnm r'L t GA < - s m o b m '6' 22 0 /�/ a.2--, mm% W y Lb m tvD•D b o ,h • 2 °•33 • '.,� t a U° p m 1..1 ^ fts 43;;,'^r- mN • iN O.O N N N N N� r t°mr 0 -m m °_ I a '+ � T '� I 0_ O O m O m y OVA w N O °m� QN A W N-O a 0•Co 2 y y • O m W W i A III m ti N ' ' 0 y D 0 H ic N Z Q 0 o o z N z z z o N N N o N s zzz z N o o m o $ p � 1 O O o • f a� m w O m m-N m N m O - m OIm m m m -. m N a r m m x o 0 0 o e e e o 0 0 0°o e e o 0 o e z m m a a i 00e •�, L y N o O A O A A N lr N O-y W•A ° ° O y X • O CO m A Vi U O,Co. °W D or. - O.C A m n N y D m co .,23 O 7 �,1 m -6,4-:.7,4,..:a...;,..1.0--6,..;.:6'0,..;,...;- r W y T > n 0 •-- O ,„ n� O ••• O p O W O W r °-W m V m w m O :1;1/N om a m - N-A . ' irimsEm rif i f �r; aa z GO b -, Z o u m p G 0 • c, ti m za t-1 D - ,,,1,-','.Z N A -, - ! N v ( N m m ti - N r m _ ° r P 7MMED-110-111111■■- • > m N >y n N.'a _ a -J A N m m O A N T N N O � O• N L1, J O, N -^.?•, 0? O O A O.w W m m N N-Cr.0 w a t0 W 0. y O A 0 m N O w -:O'. N-n m mW ,m °O m m x SEE SHEET RW 000146-4 1 n RW0001 46 _ 3 RW0001 46 - 3 . . - 9b LOOOMd b - 9 • LOOOM �► R/W PROJECT SURVEYOR: RUEL DEL CASTILLO DATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY - - - - - - 12-26-12 DISTANCES ARE REVISED FOR 225 MT - - - - - - 02-06-13 GRANTOR BLOCK REVISIONS - - - - - - lir SEE SHEET RW 00 0146-3 NNNNN NNN N` �° NNNNNNNNNNN TOO O A O O N W > N== \ O uO O N-.-. pp p W W NN O °W m 1 . ` , ~nn O O N W N-W N,N--W N m •%•• y o o� P I )38O+'9.72 • ]•• 1wm. Z 0. -1 - ..I 8,:--'• d n ---9 Vt mn�ma�'�-'ma °o W imp u nnnomo, nnn - :--f:--f H ' x x x>a>m m---, A :9 (� oo , �. m v a nnn°° A A A\\\n W N / :1, ! IIIIIIO n n n nO°m.,;;"' . - D r xD xm N0AAzZ 4I U1 z nl Z D.g H A A- , II A N O 0 0 0 2 2 2 A A 2 2 2 Z r- a 9vvi8811 ' O y m a W u J J\te\O° m o ----mm m mm . i i f A A / m W O O hey N 00 r7,7.; N • II n -J NO 44 • MATCH LINE STA 384+50 0 x IIJ < Z z F+,• . A., ., Ti"' w D m til o S}+--,,, Bi,.3 jam• �.., m oa t0•r 1. 30. C r.. �. n j D 0) m w D - m x cn 1� o N D Z N a waa CO . r. _ b.° :• 9y� °v om u w W --W a W '0'-2(n E O /09.9 oO z g, Xj mm 0..wm no ,,'SOY \ Om, u p//, tmii r r F � °w1' m w X\\ .7N .n mo W S m L., -4 z_, , --_ _a....._ n . . 41 Z m n O r 1 + _ _\ 01 4) .. O --- ---r- - �I. r + p,4 n O PO') m n ./_r `� a bo I`�J . ! l,a r o \\ -H 4.4'.f 6 w 1 \ Q\ Q o v N I b- 0 ti` 3N Q O %b - \ O • D CO {p �, . LP. . - {C O V, i m O p 0 n 0• n N '' o 0 o a. f- a ti m r `m z, a 30 b im nc - `T r � ai A- rm nEP n m . a o H T . N..•0429 /� O m o m Vs..' m m m m • N W OT '.- a m. Z‘,C] Af! o (I •`;',"2� W -� n N . � ▪C Cm m m�m ^ °m O m Ca b D.O W. �' Q . az,aN K>KasN °� r I a VII.. _ \ A 0 p A A m A m-c- �`. O _I N IS �-• 72• A , 3' O a a 0 \ O O-�m 0-..-,;:� 31 I In' I .y, I- z Z.Z N m z m z Z th -1 m - i. ;W , _.-y, z N z -mi 4'j ^ - _ - - '..1 n 78 +i.a!� a 9-1 Z $zgii E: 01 LT) H ..I� :� c�T! z�ol - .� m-,. �i m n.w a ya . ... a a,11 1a r ,� I$'I f a.-woos - m m m VI V• A A Affi .—I l"-- akist:‘. 'At' ' ' L.Jdritl .,;00 .. . . ;.' .� 1-ii ``U 8 .. D0 -. w 9� ai ° ° � Q it is a {, 3 ~ l�Y Imes 000 .A 0o ._ u1� xl — 0 1 N ` o U • � m a �m or; I r 1 ; x g w 1.r :> y a ,=,-, `' •• �y a: bnV A N m ° - mm Cli � ' m o • I -- a1 s + ._ O m •-a w ...I". �s - 3! Do a D• n gn n m °.a 36 ..0- O b r _, 0o 130 ° 0 I \o w b m N I o � : f e � m s � i ■ •w2v O a 'V:C.A. m w,n0 O - yN , mm J b mi° - 3 I o° I. W b �m `0'1l 3? �w o � /Ls' v 01 n • m m N m Z 0 3.. I , .- rn1 I 6 ,-,-.. 03 N I mO m ' I, _ O a Ww o ID mt -'I ` •w •w 0 n • a Rp N ,4 m w m - ((° + a` w Ln w W Iw N I m + ° a w I 1 -. I O W Z 44 r Q' °, N y 0t..O I ne If rn n 2,_I n r m m:1 N • N a b I N I • . ii.7 1. I N P�� '•w r U CI NI \I - I . *_ 0 - o ^;�ymao^;S W ° �L53 AMERICANA WAY' o r. aa"v 24i n ,--tN". •: . -- ,,,, , N O°f4.2.••W • ae R-cgcn< 8 200.00 g 10 .- _- -• 54*'LINE 2 240.48' m n iii: t 1_,.$e z m o ww N00°54'Inv '2.55' N l i a 2— ii xf b .. Of 1 a- • Zy i-o ON a -S - ° vo O m a w I 0 s CI ........." 1 •• °_ m Of W • I O N pp ° � N O O n y A O N cr.'' ,1", .'-2{P u 0 ■ D t °so oo o-• Z n I 7 O ,0 o •?1I S9�: °6 A I r � my �AN _ ° I r rn rn d p$° i-. _ ? I m n° ) mt o e m $°'✓� mom a m ° rm6X? 1 Z m O - 01n � ° $ az 8 m o4i I A o °gym•k'1".,S ° Q2ig- 1p1o_ $ ° _ °m mN a ° mm QO'�p d?^� nr $- ° ° a a a n n a d a a uwww ww ww w w N NO ' ( °i�O g ai a° Sa m-$A.w a w N-O.Dm,mo a W N-0.°m. 1 O]-� ° o$ E `° • ° ° mom»md0m0am0ma0m0m0mm 0. 4, I `p n-0 l,-'°e'$ 9+ 0°0"0 0 0°.0°•o o°io 000 oOmn � -.„ ♦ n .1.000..w-.21. -.u!...-4.-.0.01,0.-m ° A , n Z M I _�-, N D N N O --W a-'a N a W N a O W O O W < A - " p 0 0 O N N A W M N--W O?-IN m U O m N m N m N Om A O CO C $m!n m m r..4 4 4 rri 4 ai m m m m* f m m* n a - -. I�—� O yE Z l 0 l N Q w O - O^ r �C • a_ I. m w I \ 1 Q y tZ _ o N N A °.°N a V O m °N O A 4°U- w m-ti m � Y (f ,] N s o N T AD- Q0 WDNOO AO-O-•O-D O m 0 N m N m 0 D -,tea Q.o.ON z I r^D D y 0112 n w m p b 1 m m `I ` O n — N ` m m . m ,y• y mmrnn000 . - i 7 og �" 7 j m m0w0000.. 0 Z K .0 ui›, I 0 nw -o °m An wN oID - i w 9n m m '. Ow m 5 • a0 .. Ci � I 000 02000200 0 Z 002 m I. I U> r rtN m •R Q v O N O a O m O a a O m o O m a m m \ CI 0 cO 0000 V 0000 0 1 la\ a o A bV, 0 .D ; 7 .. a a s V a ti CO V.m a w 2 n y - '1' I ° $ A O -r n -m m I w' E y = p0 Q w mim r^ia .;aamff><zt>< Hm O m rn " C1 > 7 1 mr•` a I a a z / ► , ,,,�Z - i ma ; I• .d c� m• - I S ^ 2> ,ON wmo:o0a wONO...uoy I u - - o " Wo,°•O:° 43.00-N W. a • - ` W I > Z o N.O 0 m°,m o o.°-V N m W E _ ! W 4M+90.95 m W Z. N RW0001 46 _ 4 RW0001 46 _ 4 S - 917 L OOOM =1 S - 9 f7 L OOOMil R/W PROJECT SURVEYOR: RUEL DEL CASTILLO DATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY - - - - - - v D A I1 rn I 1 mme C) D D Z -4 0 X -1 0 ' D m D m 0 C _ 53 0 m v C 0 Ol 2 O .- "' U N O°o t,e,O m -,- p r O A ] -. J-. n O m w - m l • ri ' ' O O N N+ A $A rO�. N w bo 7 a . -I : N m z T "O o. n 91.02 c� y v C-) w w . o z co- _ _ 1 .� * -• LA .. . 1 c- Z m - m co :- Rl k) --4 v > w m 'D ` r`1 < cn i to l- C 4 -I — Q Cl) m fYl -4 z .- D N. D -1 . 13 - r z w o , X) 'B : O n m z - .e A m a 0a n kJ > x o D o z N 0O 0 n�* L 68 --\- / - \ -- - - D a m r H r. m SOO°84.2"E _ r - .. _ - ---- 'FX.[Sf--_,ELI?.,R:.LW\. - (� co 1.4 Z ExIs* R/W -' /y co fTT - --- - _ "E' L INE -As-80.°6472' 4--2498,-28" `/q, V) 8 ° 390. t 2 3 0• EAST AVE _ _ wv D I o �xIS� CITY R/W Z WJ n z1--� N 0TOO + ;..� .. w N N �7 l�NI ▪yzZ nn r m▪ums rn+� -� �e.., >m r� v oar - °, w22 r:-1;-^-..m�0V _y ". IX ron am mm- 0-40 '°av Qny :,� M n m =a ® O N Ac N ZN mo 'X5§3 mi Si�°nYx a- a Qy m , m°0'59 6nu a. , n 3 v yn2°O :IF °Ngl°8O -� n°-,-r0 V G B O__ 0 ISillzril��1 °2°° : 3� 2 m;o,r-m °$n,- ° e o$ Z *2ZyOm 2 iii ? 0 NCv Muni =N ' vg m iin0-" Ni „T ^2 N '?�m?O o's - _ � d =.-;A,, �n n ,-x g oil'-',08r• P a.00ill§' nmz5,i z°T -<0 ; 1L 2s 3S°„=o _ nA�nc 2 ,—,0,......_ ZZ z a � zi 8,- °ceP°” rT,ao2t2 o2dqz Apm`m■<i -.00• �03: °1ov I^ - °3 v3 =zr -fir" y°.8@ d_ g 8° °z m Nay ° 51 x n i ? ° _, 0] $ ° Njn n °'a x, ,-„--. O l 6. O -a v O U 1 m p o Q z r z i O y N N Zt p b&��w, .O n y y na O Z - °- ' V .9,000,-00 ,0 0 r q 0 �y n+ poCK m n to y�� o.0,°O o.o n m �c ii Of - c.A l• N i2..9, O -�,�yy �^^ y��.] N;.r�N a NOND0 O D pOo m a 1 /�+ 4, P1 mni ��rri ria > 3� YJ y ao x g 7d kq N Ot H 2A O D b m n1 z .< NA " .�..1 O , r� m O rn �O m m m: 1 • y O _ H ▪ y ,° = O x ON NO,- a 2i N C _ '11 O ` • N U,O w 0>0 01 O n 0 8 2 Ir 115 . ,nuOwv,an- m m ~ 11 W n 1 k c%o n O _ y r i•4^ 0 S m Al -1 IA RW0001 46 - 5 RW0001 46 - 5 9 - 917 L000Med 9 - 917 L000MLI . R/W PROJECT SURVEYOR: RUEL DEL CASTILLO DATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY DATE REVISIONS BY - - D A 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 . 1 . 1 1 m r y I BE'.' r7 mO C) 70 z z ti O x ti 0 I P1 m D m °c (J)rm m m� m v , 01 i CO m m (N -1 (N A m + 0 n O 0 m __i 0 Al Q N n,_< 0) i Co w u S O Da , m M Z 0 Z -I r n a 'D I-m o9 r 9\ 1 -9 z G 4. O K ,°,O 2y T o• Dom_ q .p Ts G w �z p (7�roo 0 n \J mm O xi �j a ; n cl d K Exist R _. nom, O N I I I I V) T9' 9 r&. kl:, . CITY OF RANCHO __ 0 N 00°03'51"W 2717.12' SURV., D =� p CUCAMONGA _ - CITY OF FONTANA 3 -0 --4 37 5° \ 7 - 8 9 - p- - EAST AVE w-0 p exist R/W C Z D I p •I I f l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I\l r o o ;° � 0 0 \,O r z• r I4 0 v = A P O <: m 1•+ 1.",,,, N O A -0 ./-T1 -I ,: nT22 T1 -t .ti00 _. M X -*'SSW i• n r sxq 2� °-vmorl a z m > p 1;1 m m < a 7 'do >-< O o PI D w 12+00.00 0 0 n ,-il O Z Z S o s agy D Z a C/) z am _ m ri m a ':11 om (N ® l a 4 r ▪_ 0 NR 3m /�, Z ° •-'11 [ :aiim_pa3a °oo ° ° µ3 p°a m m m _o z o m 4 -- ±p° y m - ' o p O C/ W y ° ;TA R& U m o O 0 ° s m 3 p -•rt .n m k ;la 6 n +W O 0 O.nIV O 70 0 _ . ,c-, " ,"^ ..._,1_,....._ ?), < d �m C - o • l a \ .2 r M z �� ,p •- 7d O .,z y y ° N d G °°r O N m x °° C 4 "4 y 4m o c 'O a 0 p a I 0-3 O d"e m . o O BOA �-2"1-.� a Ej. 0 O A I � -,yr m n O m b d p �, c o x a o - z m r n RW0001 46 - 6 RW0001 46 - 6 P527 STAFF REPORT CITY NL-INAGER'S OFFICE 91 RANCHO Date: May 1, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst II, City Manager's Office Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A LACTATION ACCOMMODATION POLICY AND PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution establishing a Lactation Accommodation Policy and Program for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PURPOSE This report requests City Council approval of a Resolution establishing a Lactation Accommodation Policy and Program. The Lactation Accommodation Policy and Program will ensure breastfeeding employees are provided time and a private location to express milk while at work. Additionally, it is the policy to provide breastfeeding education and support and raise community awareness. BACKGROUND Through its Healthy RC initiative, the City has made a commitment to improve the health and wellness for all its employees and residents. As a result of its progressive programs, the City has built a solid reputation as a leader to address health related issues by establishing policies that support healthy living for children and families. The City of Rancho Cucamonga and Healthy RC recognize that breasteeding is a strategy to reduce childhood obesity and related chronic diseases. Research has shown that breast milk is the optimal food for the growth and development of infants and children. Breastfeeding is beneficial for boosting an infant's immune system, is considered the best form of nutrition for infants, and has been correlated with lower rates of a number of conditions later on in life, including Type 2 diabetes and childhood obesity. A century ago, nearly one-hundred percent (100%) of babies were breasffed. Rates have declined for a number of reasons, including lack of accommodations for working mothers who were breastfeeding, social mores about the acceptability of breasteeding in public, and the development and marketing of baby formula as a primary source of nutrition. Women with infants and toddlers are the fastest growing segment of the workforce in the United States. Thirty-three percent (33%) of mothers return to work by three (3) months after delivery and sixty-six percent (66%) of mothers return to work by six (6) months after delivery. To help these P528 APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A DICTATION ACCOIYIMODATION PAGI3 2 POLICY AND PROGRAIoI NtI y I,2013 women achieve the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation that women breastfeed until children are at least one year of age, it is important to attempt to reduce the barriers for employees who choose to breastfeed and work. Lactation support in the workplace is a major factor in a mother's decision to initiate or to continue breastfeeding and policies enacted within the workplace can help to increase breastfeeding rates among mothers. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau's Business Case for Breasffeeding, parents of breasffed infants miss less time at work to care for sick children, employers have lower health care costs and medical insurance claims, and businesses (including local government) have lower turnover rates. This resolution and policy is intended to ensure breastfeeding employees are provided time and a private location to express milk while at work and provide breastfeeding education and support to all employees. The implementation of this policy and program will help support the transition of employees back to work and promote a balanced work and family life. DISCUSSION The City developed a multi-departmental taskforce (hereinafter the taskforce) to facilitate and advise the development of a Lactation Accommodation Policy and Program. Taskforce members met on a regular basis and were provided with an overview and understanding of lactation accommodation policies, analyzed survey and focus group results, and researched best practices and programs. The taskforce was charged with guiding and drafting the language of the policy. Led by the City Manager's Office, the taskforce included representatives from the following City departments: Community Services, Human Resources, City Clerk's Office, Fire, and Public Works Services. Over the last fifteen (15) months, the taskforce drafted a comprehensive Lactation Accommodation Policy and Program. Technical assistance was provided throughout the process by Loma Linda University and the County of Riverside Department of Public Health, both recognized for their work on lactation accommodation policies and practices. Assessment Activities: • Surveys: A Citywide survey on breastfeeding and lactation accommodations was distributed to all part-time and full-time female employees. Approximately 79 surveys were collected and analyzed with a response rate of approximately 28%. • Focus Group: One (1) focus group was conducted with ten (10) female employees from various City departments. The focus group was facilitated by two lactation management experts. • General Findings: o In general, participants felt that environmental, colleague, and managerial support, designated spaces, and permanent "Mother's Rooms" was critical to support their decision to breastfeed. The group supported a Lactation Accommodation Policy and Program. P529 APPROVAL OF A KESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A LACTATION ACCOMMODATION PAC;3 POLICY AND PROGRAM NLx�' 1,2013 Upon consideration of these outcomes, staff recommends that the attached resolution be adopted establishing a Lactation Accommodation Policy and Program for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The policy has been drafted according to the guidelines outlined in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau's Business Case for Breastfeeding. The policy will provide for the lactation management needs of employees and establishes guidelines for: 1. Time and Scheduling 2. Facilities 3. Employee Responsibilities 4. Employee Education 5. Community Education 6. Atmosphere of Support 7. Compliance Grant funding for the development of the Lactation Accommodation Policy and Program was provided by First 5 San Bernardino and the California Department of Public Health Childhood Obesity Prevention Program. Grant funds will also be used to upgrade the City's two designated "Mother's Rooms,"for employee usage as well as the public. FISCAL IMPACT No fiscal impact to the General Fund. Funding for various trainings, assessments, and promotional materials associated with the development and implementation of this policy is covered through existing grant funds. LEGAL REVIEW The attached policy has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's Office as to legal form and content. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution establishing a Lactation Accommodation Policy and Program for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully su p rhitted Michae�Fmer, M ement Aide 1. Attachments: Resolution No. 13-057 May 1, 2013 City Council Meeting — See the beginning of the Agenda packet for Speaker Cards. O. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item 01 . Resolution establishing a Lactation Accommodation Policy and Program Resolution No. 13-057 P530 RESOLUTION NO. 13-057 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A LACTATION ACCOMMODATION POLICY AND PROGRAM WHEREAS, Healthy RC's mission is to inspire a lifestyle that embraces a healthy mind, body and earth through lifelong learning and enrichment, active and healthy living, and environmental sustainability, and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Healthy RC recognize that inspiring a healthy lifestyle includes supporting the transition of employees back to work and promoting a balanced work and family life; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Healthy RC recognizes that breast milk is the optimal food for the growth and development of infants, and encourages employees to have a positive, accepting attitude to all working mothers; and WHEREAS, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of a child's life and breastfeeding with the addition of solid foods to continue for at least twelve months, and that arrangements be made to provide expressed breast milk if the mother and child must separate during the first year; and WHEREAS, approximately two-thirds of women who are employed when they become pregnant return to the work force by the time their children are six months old; and WHEREAS, lactation support in the workplace is a major factor in a mother's decision to initiate or to continue breastfeeding and policies enacted within the workplace can help to increase breastfeeding rates among mothers; and WHEREAS, employers benefit when their employees breastfeed - parents of breastted infants miss less time at work to care for sick children, employers have lower health care costs and medical insurance claims, and businesses (including local government) have lower turnover rates in companies with established lactation programs; and WHEREAS, the City supports breastfeeding and the expression of breast milk by employees who choose to breastfeed when they return to work; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to ensure breastfeeding employees are provided time and a private location to express milk while at work; and WHEREAS, it is the policy to provide breastfeeding education and support and raise community awareness. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopts the following standards for the Lactation Accommodation Policy and Program: Section 1: Time and Scheduling The City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that the frequency and duration of breaks to Resolution No. 13-057 - Page 1 of 4 P531 express milk will likely vary, according to the needs of the individual mother. Lactation times shall be established for each employee, based on her work schedule and according to the needs of the individual mother. If possible, lactation times should be the same as the employee's scheduled breaks and lunch period, however, if the time required for pumping is in excess of the normal break/lunch period, and as lactation needs change, the employee will discuss scheduling options with her supervisor or a Human Resources (HR) representative. The HR Department will develop scheduling procedures and protocols at designated facilities where Mother's Rooms are available for the public's use. Section 2: Facilities Employees shall be provided the use of a clean, comfortable space for milk expression. Every City facility will have a designated space available, permanent or temporary, which is not a toilet stall, bathroom, or closet and is protected from view and free from intrusion of coworkers and noxious materials. Designated spaces could include the employee's private office, a supervisor's private office, or a secured conference room. A list of identified designated spaces will be available to employees at the HR Department, on the Hub (the City's intranet), and in employee break areas. Spaces should be securable with a door that locks, equipped with an electrical outlet, contain comfortable seating with a table or other flat surface to hold a breast pump, and have covered windows to provide privacy. An ideal space would be near a sink with hot water and soap for hand washing and cleaning of equipment and access to a refrigerator for storage of expressed breast milk. For non-traditional spaces, the employee and a Human Resources representative should enter into a good faith interactive process to identify reasonable accommodations prior to returning to work. The City has two permanent "Mother's Rooms,"for employee usage as well as the public; Central Park - James L. Brulte Senior Center and City Hall. The two Mother's Rooms are to be equipped, at a minimum, with a hospital grade breast pump, electrical outlets, secured storage, a door that locks, a comfortable chair with proper support, a table or other flat surface to hold a breast pump, and a microwave for sanitizing personal equipment. Section 3: Employee Responsibilities Breastfeeding employees shall be responsible for informing the HR Department of their requests for lactation accommodation prior to returning to work. Further, the employee shall keep her supervisor or a HR representative informed if lactation accommodation needs should change. The breastfeeding employee shall also be responsible for maintaining the milk expression area, i.e., keeping it clean, and for the proper storage of their breast milk. Resolution No. 13-057 - Page 2 of 4 P532 Section 4: Employee Education a. An information packet, including a copy of this policy, information about breastfeeding support, First 5, and the WIC program shall be provided to pregnant employees prior to their maternity leave and spouses of expectant women prior to taking Family Medical Leave. b. Information promoting breastfeeding education and support will be made available for all employees in break areas, at the Human Resources Department, and on The Hub (the City's intranet), including printed material about the benefits of breastfeeding and resources within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in the community where an employee may acquire additional information. c. The City will maintain a resource library at the permanent Mother's Rooms with materials on breastfeeding, parenting, and maintaining a balanced work and family life. d. All supervisors and managers will receive training and information on the benefits of breastfeeding, the laws, and transitioning employees back to work. e. Information about the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Lactation Accommodation policy shall be provided at all new City employee orientations. Section 5: Community Education f. Information promoting breastfeeding education, support, and locations of Mother's Rooms will be made available at all City facilities, on the City's website, the mobile application (RC2GO), and the Grapevine for the community-at-large. In addition, related information will be featured in the Rancho Reporter at least once per year. g. All facilities will display signage designating the facility and City as baby-friendly and supportive of breastfeeding. h. The City, in conjunction with National Breastfeeding Awareness Month, shall proclaim August as breastfeeding awareness month. Section 6: Atmosphere of Support The City of Rancho Cucamonga will foster an environment (physical and social) that encourages breastfeeding. This includes working with Team RC and the Employee Wellness Committee to help provide support to employees transitioning back to work and maintaining a balanced work and family life. Discrimination and harassment of breastfeeding mothers in any form is unacceptable and will not be tolerated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It is prohibited under this policy to harass a lactating employee or exercise any conduct that creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment. Any incident of harassment of a lactating employee will be addressed in accordance with the City's policies and procedures for discrimination and harassment. Resolution No. 13-057 - Page 3 of 4 P533 Section 7: Compliance Managers and supervisors shall respond to any request for lactation accommodation in a manner consistent with the procedures outlined in this policy. Lactating mothers who feel they have been denied appropriate accommodation are encouraged to contact Human Resources. Investigations will be conducted in accordance with the Citywide Discrimination Complaint Procedure. Complaints may also be filed with the State compliance agency, the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), and/or the Federal compliance agency, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1s' day of May 2013. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting held on the 1s' day of May 2013. Executed this 1 s' day of May 2013 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. 13-057 - Page 4 of 4 Rancho Cucamonga • Workplace Lactation Accommodation • Rancho Cucamonga is the first to develop a Policy and Program comprehensive Workplace Lactation Accommodation Policy and Program. • Your Policy is the first in the nation to put an emphasis on community awareness. Leslie Bramson,Dr.PH,MPH,RN, Alyson Foote,RD,CLE CHES,IBCLC Regional Breastfeeding Liaison Assistant Professor of Pediatrics Riverside County WIC Program Loma Linda University Medical • You are setting the Gold Standard for cities Center,Community Health Development and business across the nation. e nn.forum/My cn,rv,n, ancho Cuca. onga Breastfeeding MEIN- • The American Academy of Pediatrics • Continues to do things"The Rancho Way"! recommends _i•a breastfeeding for 6 me.- with the inclusion of complementary foods after 6 months,with continued • This Resolution will put Rancho on the map in breastfeeding for at least 12 months. Fhe breastfeeding world. • Breastmilk is the optimal food for growth and • Rancho will be looked to as the leaden development,boosting the infants immune system and it is easy to digest. arr Benefits of Breastfeeding Physical:Excess Heak Outsomc Excess Risk(%) • Breast-fed children are more resistant to disease and Among Full Term Infants: infection than formula-fed children. Acute Ear infections 100 Enema(atopic dermatitis) 47 Diarrhea and Vomiting)Gastrointestinal 172 • Breast-fed children are less likely to contract a Infection) number of diseases,including juvenile diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 64 multiple sclerosis,heart disease,and cancer. Childhood Obesity 32 Hospitallralion for Lower Respiratory 257 Imo Oettdses at the Fest Year • Mothers who breastfed are able to lose weight Sudden during pregnancy more easily,less likely to ,nfant Death Syndrome Lit2Vt210p osteoporosis later in life,and have a lower Among Mothers: + ri a ui breast,uterine and ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer "eT cra,ll.e.,.., .6varlan Lancer 2),.. Economic Why focus on employers? Family:Save 51200-51500 in the first year of baby's life Three out of four U.S.mothers initiate breastfeeding by breastfeeding g and more than half of mothers participate in the Employers:save on health insurance claims,less labor force before their children turn one year old. absenteeism,higher productivity,higher employee retention rates and satisfaction. The lack of support in the workplace is a significant U.S. would save$13 billion annually if 90%of families barrier to breastfeeding for many working mothers. followed guidelines to breastfeed exclusively for 6 months. (If 80%complied,savings would be$10.5 billion) ,. • at's in it for employers? Environmental • Financial value:3 to 1 return on investment Natural,renewable food • Employee satisfaction:support enables women to reach their breastfeeding goals and their goals of being excellent employees, • Requires no packaging —For every one million formula-fed babies,150 • Human resources benefits: Less absenteeism, million containers of formula are consumed lower turnover,improved recruitment and retention • Positive public relations and marketing: • Requires no transportation 1 breastfeeding is good for women,children,families, and public health. • Congratulations! Questions ? And Thank you! •I , •_t. O 0 • CI > 0 IA Q. Q z n C NJ rb 0 o z-- 1%4Z Ge) 'NZ 0 VI f 0 410--. v • 0 IqUir. 1't I lit< L._,rr •11 11a 1 • ,r ` sy• ij1.1,3.....4-.-:vv.-, '=. k `• I,• r I fD • 1, 1 .. /'Y'. , , \ i a •' • • . ....1, ' . ....... r) • x ....• ... 0 vii • • • rn n D = n n O c-) (D 0 . . cTQ cu 3 C r-i- a) 3 ciA) 3 acl 3 rt) n-1m c r ,C 0 3 -' - •• 'D CD -. C rn • • O p -o ° 0 O Q tin rya I . J. Ilk= . -;..- "-. 'r- - - ■., f 1hr1111 �� •.. r ., r _. c�I n 0,-. t `1 6 u 4 n. O 1 M. 3 3 4111 �\ • •• •• • _ m c n cn r 0 _, x r+ c O it von4.61. .. , r) C CD .. <' cq C t� ' _ ro n 3 Q 2 CD 3 CD v) M 3 3 (1) � m Di CD CD �. • • i C o rIlli i 1 1 1 1 0 I cu 0 n Oo n E n = m ; m r'�„t, p 0 M _0 _. CU 0 C 0 n (D X c n. 3 2 -J B o 2 7 CD = 3_ <M r+ • C C -' o VI cn CD a SD z '< co rt 82R o C ITI 04 �. _. �, c ,- n = z- z- M cu cu ri. r : Oxi _. -U N O .CD CU 11) 3 IMP o 'I, O y = v',. CD . St.34116 1. , , .0 LE 3 r CD I ^ .! M il ~O 1 r G CO rVIII 4t4 ' i \;,: f O CL 4 ° � , CD r 0,wag • i 1 as i i : ,.4, _ _.,..9..,,-,. s .4, rn .. ,,„,t.t., , , 1 . _ __. .._, -, . .....„, trg,..,... ,..(5. i i . 411e=. aL. B i. .•, . _ o_ f , *• h( , A yi 444i • 4t i ' f t I t ti , • • • • • 0 0 3. . ,_,D . , 0 ta) 0 CD C -0 0 1 c o CD 2• 3 n. r.4. cm =-‘. O 3 3 CD c .91 rt cc) r";C D-- 3 v, PIO cn r D DJ Q n Q) CO 411‹on C O rt c!) fIJ SID—. _ � -• n D c r- _- („ < 3•D '• :• rn CD 0 oviio rF o• rt O CL .0 `C CD 3 D- rt Z DJ n (D C-) 0 0 —h CD cn 0 •< Q) r-'' O �` rt n D- CD CD v, -' rn • Q I I I () 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o O ci.) rn -0 - r m n - < G On z n C- O CD O -s O -7 D- CD-s v �- O c CD `< <-s -; 7. n , _ r D O c 7. (D O u' � v' D ■ D ` v' CI -h -i- Q C CD r-+ v CD D O CD D C.) (D O (D -N CD CD C �' CD CD 0_. m , 3 : , , ,_...0 CD n � CO O 3= C„ n O CD 3 0 • CD C _ O D CD _ (CD rD 'C rt lol • --h O n CU ,. _.- % I el '1( ,,i. it . ,,, 3 C 't1; -• . Pimp : • ( 4 1 , -,, ( : -:: --I.' ----t l S _M 44.• i. A • -.Ow apsu '' / ii ',,,t_ , . J r. . . '„ ."-f.-;---)-,_.„,,-; . .... ...... ....,_ ...,, ;.--- . V 4- • • • • • o o I I I I z I I I c r - c 3 CD CD CD n N CCD O D __ rt r•t — N Q rD O (Pli U'1 N rD C X) (=V O -s cn 1 O 3 E r-r ■ 3 O O f D- 3 n 4 7C" CD n) CD CD C C —h = cm —I D rfDi• r=+ r-t; CM Cu -0 -0 V) CD v 2 u, v) O n CD U� O " • O n O -•-G v = -0 v CD- CD 0'Q -0 u..) r-r cn -% Z CD O + CD o_ (-P m n -. v' 0 i -t- r+, n O (D (Ds • CD n• CD (to III. ma ..1 1' Ca .4 p w tia • 0 r ' . ' ,41....., 6111k 4F $ 4. \Vet,„ P A • • • • • • • • co v) — r-r cu rD 0 nD 0.- _ fl' ET) o Co CI 0 c 30 : : : o —rts _. CD Cu a) X _, cu -% 0_ (D rD c 3 (D CD CD NJ C N N 0 1...• rim • • • • • .< _so- t. .1 v) ril cu-• rD o _ u., , n- 3 w _. Cu D -. tD Cu CU n a) D -o• � gi G) cr = o cr, 13 m n (1. (-/' Ario. rD rD E rc1)1 ID 0 0 Ni 0._ C = 0 —. (Cs C TT Z a- (D al c n ED W r-F CD 0 `< Z = ix .......... —.h Da lip O Ili - 7z) n mg - co 3 ■1 = E Cu 7 N 9- cn Q o o -v 3 , . O n o O n rD n cp.(-) ,.. x e_fr 0 N 3 -in o o 7o -p n 011 : E •tea v) rD g v-A ;--. .6i —, --W 7:1 ,, I May 1, 2013 City Council Meeting — Contact the City Clerk's Office to view the video on file. P2. Video presentation of the Community Services Department's Annual Report. VIDEO PRESENTATION May 1,2013 City Council Meeting-Item P3- URGENCY ITEM(Added Item P3.) • to the City Manager's Staff Report dated April 30,2013 and regards recommendation that the City Council approve the appointment of the suggested candidates for the Building Board of Appeals. STAFF REPORT c_ J Bull.olive AND SAFETY Dr?h.�fz'la[r:;�r Date: May 1, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Member of City Council John Gillison, City Manager From: Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Services Director Subject: BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS AND THE MEMBERSHIP APPOINTMENT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the appointment of the suggested candidates for the Building Board of Appeals. BACKGROUND: The City adopted the building code three years ago with the requirement of the Building Board of Appeals as described in Section 113 of the California Building Code. The last Building Board of Appeals was created in July 1999. Recently, there was a situation in which an applicant appealed the action of the Building and Safety Services Director on a code application and its enforcement to the Building Board of Appeals. Therefore, there is a need for re-creating a new Board at this time. According to the code, the Building Board of Appeals shall consist of three members and two alternates who are qualified by experience and training to pass on matters pertaining to building requirements and construction techniques and who are not employees of the jurisdiction. The Building Board of Appeals is formed as an ad-hoc Board in this case. The following individuals are recommended for appointment to the Board. • Mr. Peter Pitassi, AIA, licensed Architect • Mr. Tom Campbell, P.E., licensed Civil and Plan Check Engineer • Mr. Dan Guerra, P.E., licensed Civil Engineer • Mr. Serge Bonaldo, P.E., licensed Civil Engineer (Alternate) • Mr. Wendell Iwatsuru, P.E., licensed Civil Engineer (Alternate) All of these individuals are Rancho Cucamonga residents and they have indicated a willingness and desire to serve on this Building Board of Appeals. Their credentials and professional experience are outstanding. Respectfully Submitted, / • —7 , Trang 'uy h, P.' . Building and Safety Services Director Attachment: Resumes of the Candidates PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC. PETER J. PITASSI, AIA, LEED AP EDUCATION California State Polytechnic University, Pomona- 1976 Bachelor of Science in Architecture, Cum Laude REGISTRATION Registered Architect,California, C-11446 Registered Architect,Texas, 16,828(Inactive) NCARB, 50,084 EXPERIENCE President, Pitassi Architects, Inc. 2002 - Present Principal, Peter J. Pitassi,AIA, Architect- Rancho Cucamonga, CA 1994- 2001 Pitassi•Dalmau Architects- Rancho Cucamonga, CA, Principal 1986- 1994 The Barmakian Company- Rancho Cucamonga, CA, Vice President,Architecture 1984— 1986 Kiyotoki Associates- Irvine, CA. Associate, Project Architect 1980- 1984 Norman R. Nichols, AIA,Architect- Glendora, CA, Designer 1976- 1980 QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Pitassi has over 35 years of architectural design experience from personal service assignments to multi-million dollar projects. His years of private practice have allowed him the opportunity to provide high quality professional services to both public and private clients. Mr. Pitassi is involved in all aspects of his practice.The firm's projects include land planning assignments, residential design, commercial projects, industrial parks, community and recreational facilities, and interior design. NOTABLE PROJECTS Paul A. Biane Library, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Archibald Library, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Indio Police Headquarters, Indio,CA Alexander Hughes Community Center, Claremont, CA Indio Service Center, City of Indio, Indio, CA AFFILIATIONS 1995-1996 Director, American Institute of Architects, California Council 1994 President of the American Institute of Architects, Inland California Chapter Former Chairman of the Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Commission, 1983-1988 Oral Commissioner, California Architects Board Member, USGBC ACCOMPLISHMENTS Lifetime Member California Scholastic Federation Honors at Entrance Cal Poly Pomona September, 1972 Past President Architectural Students Forum, Cal Poly Pomona Recipient of Multiple Design Awards from the American Institute of Architects Inland California Chapter, the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Claremont, the California Parks & Recreation Society, and the Pacific Coast Builders Conference. Please refer to the firm website for a detailed list of awards. • 8439 White Oak Ave.,Suite. 105 I Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 Tel.(909)980-1361 I Fax.(909)944-58141 www.pitassiarchitects.com THOMAS I. CAMPBELL, P.E. 5331 Galloway Street Cell: (951) 741-2107 Alta Loma, California 91701 ticampbell @charter.net Qualifications and Skills Thirty-three years of combined design,management and teaching experience;design,detail and plan review stages of numerous industrial,commercial and residential projects;evaluating new building materials and methods of construction;management of ICBO's Education Program,developing and delivering classroom instructional material based on the UBC,IBC and IRC to code enforcement personnel,architects,engineers and contractors;instruction of fundamental building design to graduate and senior level college architectural students. Experience Tom Campbell and Associates,Alta Loma, CA Principle 03/04 to Present • Prepare structural calculations and develop structural plans and details based on the CBC and IBC • Projects include:design of steel arched canopies,fire damage assessment and repair of structures,retrofitting existing structures for earthquake mitigation,steel and glass canopies,commercial and residential construction(new and remodel). Interwest Consulting Group, Long Beach, CA Building and Code Services/Supervising Plan Review Engineer,Project Manager 06/06 to Present • Review architectural and structural plans for compliance with the California Building Code and International Building Code • Develop training manuals based on the UBC and IBC (and referenced standards) for use by client's staff International Code Council Evaluation Service, Inc, Whittier, CA Senior Staff Engineer 03/85 to 10/86 and 04/04 to 06/06 • Reviewed technical test reports and prepared evaluation reports based on the provisions of the ICC model codes • Developed test standards (acceptance criteria) to evaluate products not showing compliance with the ICC model codes International Code Council, Whittier, CA Acquisition and Development Technical Engineer 12/02 to 04/04 • Recruited authors for technical publications • Reviewed technical publications for compliance with the ICC's model codes • Developed technical publication based on the structural provisions of the International Building Code International Conference of Building Officials,Whittier, CA Education Programs Manager 04/88 to 12/02 • Supervised and directed support and technical staff of 15 individuals • Established department budget and ensured expenditures remained within budgetary limitations • Scheduled training programs throughout the USA and internationally • Established department objectives and goals • Developed and prepared training manuals based on the UBC,IBC and IRC • Supervised seminar development program • Maintained computer software used in the education department Fred Ashton and Associates, Claremont, CA Engineer 02/80 to 03/85 • Performed structural design and details of industrial,commercial and residential structures • Coordinated structural design with architects • Supervised draftsman California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA Lecturer 02/80 to 03/85 • Developed curriculum for and instruction to graduate and senior level architectural students in various aspects of structural design Education and Professional Designations California State Polytechnic University, Pomona,California;Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering Registered Civil Engineer in California C37948 Registered Civil Engineer in Nevada 18414 Registered Civil Engineer in Utah 8317415-2202 Registered Civil Engineer in Idaho 14808 ICC Building Plans Examiner Dan Guerra & Associates CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS ter. Daniel E. Guerra, P.E. PROFESSIONAL Founding partner of the firm. Experience prior to involvement with EXPERIENCE: Dan Guerra & Associates (DGA), formerly Derbish, Guerra & Associates, includes two years in private practice in the civil field and four years in structural related work. Has performed as Principal Engineer/Project Manager on numerous projects, including public street and storm drains, public parks, police stations, fire stations, schools, libraries, community centers and minor league baseball stadiums and numerous private residential, commercial and industrial developments. Has been directly responsible for managing plan check review services on more than three hundred single and multi-family housing, planned communities, commercial and industrial projects for the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Chino, Ontario and Upland since 1978. Has previously served as City Surveyor for the City of Chino Hills (2005-2007) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (2009-2010), in addition to serving as Interim Surveyor and Interim Assistant to City Engineer(2008-2009) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. EDUCATION: California State Polytechnic University at Pomona- Bachelor of Science Degree, Civil Engineering, Cum Laude - 1976 California State Polytechnic University at Pomona- Master of Science Degree, Civil Engineering- incomplete EMPLOYMENT: 2000—Present Dan Guerra & Associates - Principal Engineer 1978 - 1999 Derbish, Guerra & Associates—Managing Partner 1977 - 1978 George H. Mim Mack, Consulting Civil Engineer 1973 - 1977 Hirt Engineers, Montebello, California PROFESSIONAL National Society of Professional Engineers (inactive) AFFILIATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers (inactive) American Water Works Association (inactive) American Concrete Institute (inactive) PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Registered Civil Engineer- State of California - RCE 29224 10700 Jersey Blvd.,Ste.700 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 Phone(909)944-9992 Serge V. Bonaldo Education [ 1979- 1985 ] California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Pomona, CA Bachelor of Science In Civil Engineering Professional [ 2002-Present ] Bonaldo Engineering Rancho Cucamonga, CA experience President • President of a Structural Engineering firm for residential and commercial projects utilizing wood, masonry, concrete, and steel construction. [ 1991 -2002 ] Bonaldo Engineering Rancho Cucamonga, CA Owner • Owner of a Structural Engineering firm for residential and commercial projects utilizing wood,masonry, concrete, and steel construction. [ 1990—1991 ] Wood Engineering Rancho Cucamonga,CA Senior Vice President • Project manager, project estimating, and structural calculation for residential and commercial buildings. [ 1989—1990] Wood Engineering Rancho Cucamonga, CA Professional Engineer • Project manager, structural calculations and drafting on structural plans for residential and commercial buildings. [ 1985—1989] Wood Engineering Rancho Cucamonga, CA Engl neer-In-Tralni ng • Structural calculations and drafting on structural plans for residential and commercial buildings. [ 1979—1985] Wood Engineering Rancho Cucamonga,CA Engineering Draftman • Drafting on structural plans for residential and commercial buildings. Professional American Society of Civil Engineers memberships International Conference of Building Officials American Institute of Architects Resume of Wendell L. Iwatsuru, P.E., V.P., (R.C.E. 36637) Wendell L. Iwatsuru, P.E., will be the responsible representative in charge of the project. He has over 35 years of experience in public improvement projects, residential, commercial, and public schools. His experience includes project management and design, preparation of proposals and construction estimates, site plans, construction documents and specifications, including SWPPP and WQMP, streets and highway design, drainage systems, sewer and water systems, and preparation of maps and grading documents. Mr. Iwatsuru's experience has been in the counties of San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, Los Angeles and Ventura. Education: Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering —California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California Associate of Arts in Civil Engineering Technology— Fullerton Junior College, Fullerton, California Registration: Registered Professional Engineer—Civil Engineering California R.C.E. 36637 Experience: ➢ Fourth Street Storm Drain &Street Improvements, Ontario, CA One mile infrastructure design, construction document preparation, and construction assistance for the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Ontario. Included Master Plan Drainage and Storm Drain as well as the construction of the public improvements and coordination with two Cities. ➢ Concours Public Street and Storm Drain Improvements, Ontario, CA. One mile infrastructure design, construction document preparation, and construction assistance for the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Ontario. Included Master Plan Drainage and Storm Drain as well as the construction of the public improvements. ➢ Madera Road Street Improvements, Simi Valley, CA Public Works project in conjunction with City of Simi Valley and a private developer for highway improvements, including drainage. ➢ Twenty-Nine Palms Marine Corps Ground-Air Base Public Works Projects, Twenty-Nine Palms, CA Design grading, roadway and drainage facilities throughout Mainside. ➢ Humboldt Avenue Master Plan Storm Drain, Rancho Cucamonga, CA This project involved the design of a master plan of storm drain for Humboldt Avenue located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, utilizing 66-inch and 72-inch diameter R.C.P. with 100 linear feet of 6' x 3' R.C.B. The storm drain laterals consisted of 1,100 linear feet of 48-inch R.C.P. and 400 linear feet of 24-inch R.C.P. The County of San Bernardino Flood Control, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers were involved in the implementation to provide connection to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The project involved the design of water relocations, sewer and water crossings to approximately 40 existing residences, as well as pavement repair. ➢ Citrus Avenue, Fontana, CA • This project involved the design of a master plan storm drain for Citrus Avenue, consisting of 4,000 linear feet of 42-inch, 72-inch and 84-inch R.C.P. Street Improvements included 4,000 linear feet of design, within 104-feet of right-of-way, including median design. Sewer Improvements included 3,900 linear feet of 15-inch pipe. Sewer and storm drain laterals were provided to the adjacent properties. ➢ Lytle Creek Road, Fontana, CA This project involved the design of a master plan of storm drain for Lytle Creek Road located in the City of Fontana, which involved 2,500 linear feet of 66-inch R.C.P., 2,500 linear feet of 8-inch sewer improvements, 2,600 linear feet of street improvements within a 92-foot right-of-way, 1,200 linear feet of water improvements with 12-inch steel pipe (working in conjunction with West Valley Water District). We worked closely with Metropolitan Water District for processing the encroachment approvals to cross an existing 96-inch water line and 144-inch water line. We also worked in conjunction with San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District in regards to the crossing of a 41-inch water line within Southern California Edison's Easement. ➢ Ocean Villa Residential High Rise, Lone Beach, CA Two acre compact 18-story development between Ocean Boulevard & Seaside Way. Project development for and with infrastructure-utility-drainage-structural-site coordination. Incorporate geotechnical water table and foundation restriction requirements into the drainage & sewerage designs. ➢ Mission Boulevard Storm Drain, Montclair, CA Over 1 mile of master plan storm drain design & drainage study for the City of Montclair. A Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and County of San Bernardino was obtained for the infrastructure connection to the San Antonio Channel. ➢ Main Street &Owens Street(E. Memory Lane) Improvements, Santa Ana, CA Public Works project for infrastructure improvements for 3/4 mile of Owens Street and Main Street in downtown Santa Ana adjacent to the Santiago Creek and Santiago Park. Design coordination included the County Flood Control, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, and the relocation of a jet fuel line as well as the reconstruction of the park landscaping.