HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013/06/13 - Agenda Packet - Special city fof
AN H O OUCAMONGA
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
SPECIAL MEETING
Thursday, June 13, 2013 -�- 6:00 p.m.
City Hall 4 Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive O Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
A. CALL TO ORDER:
Al. Pledge of Allegiance
A2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo
Council Members Alexander, Steinorth and Williams
B. COMMUNICATION FROM THE PUBLIC:
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District and City Council on
any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Board or City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board or City Council may receive testimony and
set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or
less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak.
All communications are to be addressed directly to the Mayor and not to the members of the audience.
This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any
debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be
disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
SPECIAL MEETING
Thursday, June 13, 2013 O 6:00 p.m.
City Hall O Council Chambers
Page 1 of 5
-- CONTINUED --
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
JUNE 133 2013 2
I(;,,AM,,,,, 6:00 P.M. - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Board/City Council at one time without
discussion. Any item may be removed by a Board/Council Member for discussion.
C. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
C1. Approval of the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Pi
Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated fund balance policy and 2) a Resolution
committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-024 PB
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL
RESERVES FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT
C2. Approval of corrections to amended Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Appropriations. P8
C3. Approval of repayment of funds advanced by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the Rancho P10
Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
C4. Adjustment in Board Member meeting stipend. P71
RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-025 P12
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESTORING BOARD MEMBER STIPENDS
D. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL
D1. Approval of the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Pia
Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated fund balance policy and 2) a Resolution
committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
RESOLUTION NO. 13-080 P18
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF
FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P20
D2. Approval of corrections to amended Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Appropriations.
D3. Approval of Capital Improvement Program (CIP)for Fiscal Year 2013/2014. P22
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
JUNE 135 2013 3
in ANIONI,A 6:00 P.M. - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
D4. Approval of General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy. PY76
D5. Approval of repayment of funds advanced by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the Rancho P181
Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
E. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements.
E1. Consideration to adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District General Fund P182
preliminary budget in the amount of $24,742,110 and appropriations limit in the amount of
$31,808,076 for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 and set final approval of final budget for July 17,
2013.
RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-026 P184
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL FUND
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 PURSUANT
TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
E2. Consideration of approval of Resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $6,870,790 and P186
approving the appropriations limit in the amount of $12,116,607 for Fiscal Year 2013/14 in
Communities Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1.
RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-027 P188
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14
RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-028 P190
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
E3. Consideration of approval of Resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $2,023,430 and P192
approving the Appropriations Limit in the amount of $2,915,959 for Fiscal Year 2013/14 in
Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1.
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
`� 4
JUNE 13, 2013
6:00 P.M. - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-029 P194
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14
RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-030 P196
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2013/14 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION
LL F. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
CITY COUNCIL
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements.
F1. Consideration of adoption of Fiscal Year 2013/2014 budget and Article XIIIB appropriations P198
limit.
RESOLUTION NO. 13-081 P199
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR
2013/2014 BUDGET
P201
RESOLUTION NO. 13-082
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE
CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014
G. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra L. McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on June 10, 2013 at least twenty-four hours prior to the meeting per
Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
I
RECEIVED
714 JUN is 2013
Good Evening Mr. Mayor and Council Members,
City
a� ofrta„c„tERK
I'm here in regards to an article I read in the Daily Bulletin regarding M7o„Gq
"Budgeting for Traffic Control on Thoroughbred”
After several of the residents in this area read this article, there is concern
that if funds are going to be budgeted for this "event" as it's been called,
more and more restrictions will be put upon the residents, including the
possibility of permits just to be able to decorate and put up lights.
Mayor Michaels stated in the article, "I don't know if a permit would be the best route to
go" and "Thinking about it a little further, maybe there are better ways of handling
it in a less intrusive way." We agree.
In the past, the Christmas Light annual residents meeting, that is facilitated by the Police
Department, is prefaced with, "This is NOT a city sanctioned event." By budgeting
funds, does this mean it's a city sanctioned event? If so, there is cause for concern.
At this meeting, many residents ask "How" can they give their input about safety,
parking, food selling, etc. The officer in charge of the meeting (usually Sgt. Kreps) states
that this residents meeting is the time and place. However, that isn't the case since the
decisions have already been made by the Police and the City PRIOR to the meeting.
Thus, the meeting becomes about what WILL take place. It's usually TOO late to change
or add anything at this point. Basically, the residents did NOT get to give input to many
of the issues.
This past year, we had the good fortune of Burrtec Waste providing trash receptacles as
well as manpower, at THEIR expense, to help with the clean-up. Typically, it's the
residents themselves, that handle the clean-up. We go out each day and pick up trash
from the night before. One or two years, we had the good fortune of the Boy Scouts
coming to help with clean-up. I don't recall the city providing any specific clean-up.
The "Public Forum" that Mayor Michaels references would be a good idea. Specifically,
if you include residents from this respective area. It's important to do this before the
Christmas Season is upon us and BEFORE the annual residents meeting. I for one would
like to be included in the "Public Forum." This would allow dialogue between the
Police, City and residents.
As for safety, being one of the main concerns, we understand the need for this. However,
it seems the term, "In the interest of Public Safety" has become a catch phrase for
anything the City and/or Police Department want to do.
CC: L.Dennis Michael,Mayor;
Sam Spagnolo,Mayor Pro Tem;
Diane Williams,City Council Member;
Bill Alexander,City Council Member;
Marc Steinorth,City Council Member;
Janice C.Reynolds,City Clerk:
James Markman,City Attorney;
John Gillison,City Manager;
Linda Daniels,Assistant City Manager;
Debra McNay,Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager;
Jell Bloom,Deputy City Manager,Economic 8 Community Director;
Lon Sassoon.Deputy City Manager.Administrative Services;
Mark Steuer.Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer;
Jason Welday,Traffic Engineer:
Bill Wittkopf:Director of Public Works Services
Trang Huynh.Building&Safety Director
Mike Bell,Chief—RC Fire Protection District
Mike Newcombe,Captain—RC Police Department
Re:Traffic Control on Thoroughbred,Thurs.,June 13,2013
RECEIVED
JUN 1Z 2013
Good Evening Mr. Mayor and Council Members,
City
corn of�► CLERK
I'm here in regards to an article I read in the Daily Bulletin regarding No cucquvtoNGA
"Budgeting for Traffic Control on Thoroughbred"
After several of the residents in this area read this article, there is concern
that if funds are going to be budgeted for this"event"as it's been called,
more and more restrictions will be put upon the residents, including the
possibility of permits just to be able to decorate and put up lights.
Mayor Michaels stated in the article, "I don't know if a permit would be the best route to
go" and"Thinking about it a little further, maybe there are better ways of handling
it in a less intrusive way." We agree.
In the past, the Christmas Light annual residents meeting, that is facilitated by the Police
Department, is prefaced with, "This is NOT a city sanctioned event." By budgeting
funds, does this mean it's a city sanctioned event? If so, there is cause for concern.
At this meeting, many residents ask"How" can they give their input about safety,
parking, food selling, etc. The officer in charge of the meeting (usually Sgt. Kreps) states
that this residents meeting is the time and place. However, that isn't the case since the
decisions have already been made by the Police and the City PRIOR to the meeting.
Thus, the meeting becomes about what WILL take place. It's usually TOO late to change
or add anything at this point. Basically,the residents did NOT get to give input to many
of the issues.
This past year, we had the good fortune of Burrtec Waste providing trash receptacles as
well as manpower, at THEIR expense, to help with the clean-up. Typically, it's the
residents themselves, that handle the clean-up. We go out each day and pick up trash
from the night before. One or two years, we had the good fortune of the Boy Scouts
coming to help with clean-up. I don't recall the city providing any specific clean-up.
The "Public Forum"that Mayor Michaels references would be a good idea. Specifically,
if you include residents from this respective area. It's important to do this before the
Christmas Season is upon us and BEFORE the annual residents meeting. I for one would
like to be included in the "Public Forum." This would allow dialogue between the
Police, City and residents.
As for safety, being one of the main concerns, we understand the need for this. However,
it seems the term, "In the interest of Public Safety"has become a catch phrase for
anything the City and/or Police Department want to do.
For example, I have lived in my current home on Jennet Street for over 19 years. Jennet
Street is the Ingress for when traffic is controlled. We have participated each and every
year in the Christmas decorating. We typically sit in our front driveway and watch all the
people go by. In all these years, we've never had a problem with cars parking across the
street on the north side of Jennet. This past year, parking on the north side of Jennet from
Sapphire to the East all the way to Turquoise to the west,NO parking signs were
installed. We were told, it was "In the interest of Public Safety" in the event police or
fire had to get down the street,that the no parking was implemented. If a fire truck or
police car wanted to get down this street, believe me, lights and sirens would move
everyone out of the way. Jennet Street IS wider than Thoroughbred Street.
We feel these no parking signs were not needed.
The NO parking was a real hardship to many of the residents both on Jennet and the
adjacent cul-de-sac streets. When having guests over, we knew to tell them to get to our
house before 5 PM. Guests would have to find the closest place to park OFF of the
Jennet Street. At times, this could be quite far from the respective home the guest was
visiting. Worse yet, was when we had elderly or handicap visitors. When their visit was
over, their driver would go get their car to come and pick up the guest, but due to traffic
flow, they weren't able to come back in the opposite direction of traffic. They would
have to at times,make the entire loop, which could take an hour, or wait until after 11
PM when the traffic control was no longer in place. If they were able to park across the
street on the north side of Jennet, they would be facing west, with the flow of traffic and
able to pick up guests. They could head west and without going to the south to go around
Thoroughbred,they could exit at the Turquoise/Jennet blockade and head north on
Turquoise towards Hillside out of the decorated area.
Another thing we noticed when the No parking on Jennet was implemented, that the
police cars were NOT getting down the street any easier. Basically, this change just
meant there was a wider berth for foot traffic and for cars to have a little more free range.
Food/drink selling is something that has really gotten out of hand. This past year, permits
were required for selling certain types of food. We are not sure if this was enforced by
the Health Dept. or not. The set back requirement for where the food booth was placed
from the street, was not always adhered to. Cars were constantly stopping in front of the
homes to make a food/drink purchase,thus causing a delay with the traffic flow.
Maybe the food selling should be looked into. In the early days, resident families would
give away hot chocolate for free. Now that it's obvious to a lot of residents, that there is
a lot of money to be made, there are more and more food/drink stands. This has by far,
caused more of the traffic problem than the lights or decorations.
Another item of concern, is that commercial vendors are paying neighbors to allow them
to use their driveway for the evening.
Councilman Bill Alexander expressed some unease over the entire community having to
pay to help a particular region of the city. I don't have any children, but I still pay taxes
for things relating to schools. I don't go to our public parks, but I pay relevant taxes to
support the parks.
The city has greatly benefitted by having the Christmas Light display. People from all
over come to our city. They utilize our gas stations, restaurants, grocery stores and coffee
houses. This has increased the revenue for our city. In addition, people recognize what a
charming city Rancho Cucamonga is. When they are looking to buy a home or possibly
start a business, they will keep this city in mind.
I thank you all for your time and hope that by having money put into the budget for
the Christmas Light Display traffic control,just isn't another constriction of our
individual liberties, under the guise of Public Safety.
Thank you.
P1
STAFF REPORT -
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
RANCHO
Date: June 13, 2013 C,UCAMONGA
To: President and Members of the Board of Directors
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director 1W
Subject: APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH
GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (GASB) STATEMENT NO.
54: 1) UPDATED FUND BALANCE POLICY AND 2) A RESOLUTION COMMITTING
TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Fire Board approve the following to be in compliance with Governmental
Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated Fund Balance Policy and 2) a
resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District.
BACKGROUND
On a regular basis, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) adopts new policies
and procedures that apply to public entities. In the prior year, GASB issued Statement No. 54
which applies to Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions (GASB 54). In
order to be in compliance with GASB 54, the Fire District approved a Fund Balance Policy on June
15, 2011 and approved a resolution committing to the level of reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District.
In order to accommodate any changes to these commitments that may become necessary due to
changes in operations or changes in City Council goals, staff annually brings this policy and
resolution before the Board for approval at the end of each fiscal year. The policy has been
updated to incorporate a higher threshold for the District's Working Capital reserve due to the
continuing shift of resources from the former RDA to the Fire District. The minimum goal has been
increased from 10% to 50% of the Fire District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year.
The attached policy is presented to the Fire Board for review and approval. The attached resolution
formally establishes the Fire District's fund balance commitments for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2013.
lAriinancelbudget20141City Council staff reportslGASB54-Fire District 2013-14.doc
P2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FUND BALANCE POLICY
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA POLICY NO.: _-_
PAGE 1 OF 4
EFFECTIVE: June 15,2011
REVISED: June 13,2013
APPROVED:
PURPOSE
This Fund Balance Policy establishes the procedures for the reporting of unrestricted fund
balance in the City General Fund and Fire District financial statements. Certain commitments
and assignments of fund balance will help ensure that there will be adequate financial resources
to protect the City against unforeseen circumstances and events such as revenue shortfalls and
unanticipated expenditures. The policy also authorizes and directs the Finance Director to
prepare financial reports which accurately categorize fund balance as per Governmental
Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and
Governmental Fund Type Definitions.
GENERAL POLICY
Fund balance is essentially the difference between the assets and liabilities reported in a
governmental fund. There are five separate components of fund balance, each of which
identifies the extent to which the City/Fire District is bound to honor constraints on the specific
purposes for which amounts can be spent.
• Nonspendable fund balance (inherently nonspendable)
• Restricted fund balance (externally enforceable limitations on use)
• Committed fund balance (self-imposed limitations on use)
• Assigned fund balance (limitation resultingfrom intended use)
• Unassigned fund balance (residual net resources)
The first two components listed above are not addressed in this policy due to the nature of their
restrictions. An example of nonspendable fund balance is inventory. Restricted fund balance is
either imposed by law or constrained by grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other
governments. This policy is focused on financial reporting of unrestricted fund balance, or the
last three components listed above. These three components are further defined below.
Fund Balance Policy P3
Page 2 of 4
Committed Fund Balance
The City Council (which also acts as the Board of Directors for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District), as the City's highest level of decision-making authority, may commit fund
balance for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by formal actions taken, such as an
ordinance or resolution. These committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless
the City Council/Fire Board removes or changes the specified use through the same type of
formal action taken to establish the commitment. City Council/Fire Board action to commit fund
balance needs to occur within the fiscal reporting period; however, the amount can be
determined subsequently.
• Changes in Economic Circumstances
The City's General Fund balance committed for changes in economic circumstances is
established at a goal of a six month reserve, or 50% of the City General Fund operating
budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The Fire District's fund balance committed for
changes in economic circumstances is established at a goal of a six month reserve, or
50% of the Fire District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. As defined in
the resolution establishing this commitment, the specific uses are listed as the declaration
of a state or federal state of emergency or a local emergency as defined in Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.36.020; or a change in economic circumstances in
a given fiscal year that results in revenues to the City/Fire District being insufficient to
cover expenditures for one or more fiscal years. The City Council/Fire Board may, by
the affirming vote of three members, change the amount of this commitment and/or the
specific uses of these monies.
• City Facilities Capital Repair
The City's General Fund balance committed for City facilities capital repair is
established at a minimum goal of 25% of capital assets value comprised of construction
in progress (excluding infrastructure), building improvements, and improvements other
than building for governmental activities.
• Fire District Facilities Capital Repair
The Fire District's fund balance committed for the Fire District facilities capital repair is
hereby committed to a minimum goal of 50% of capital assets value comprised of
construction in progress (excluding infrastructure), building improvements, and
improvements other than building for public safety-fire activities.
• Working Capital
The City's General Fund balance committed for Working Capital is established at a goal
of a minimum of 5% of the City's General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal
year. The Fire District's fund balance committed for Working Capital is established at a
P4
Fund Balance Policy
Page 3 of 4
goal of a minimum of 50% of the District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal
year.
• Self-Insurance
The City's General Fund balance committed for payment of general liability claims
primarily through the use of interest earnings on the reserve but not limited to such in the
event of an unfavorable interest rate environment is established at a minimum goal of
three times the City's total yearly SIR for all types of insurance coverage.
• Employee Leave Payouts
The City's General Fund balance and the Fire District's fund balance committed for
employee leave payouts as valued in accordance with the City's labor contracts as of the
last day of the fiscal year.
• PERS Rate Stabilization
The City's General Fund and Fire District's fund balance committed to offset projected
rate increases identified in the respective annual CalPERS actuarial valuation for two
fiscal years after the year of financial reporting.
• Dispatch System Acquisition
The Fire District's fund balance committed to JPA membership for the District's current
dispatch system.
• Booking Fees
The City's General Fund balance committed to provide funding for an increase in the
booking fees charged to the City by the County of San Bernardino not readily
determinable at the time of budget adoption due to the delay in the adoption of the State
of California's budget.
• Vehicle and Equipment Replacement
The Fire District's fund balance committed for the replacement of fire safety vehicles
and equipment as determined based on the District's replacement criteria is established at
a minimum goal of 50% of District vehicle and equipment replacement value.
• Law Enforcement
The City's General Fund balance committed for public safety purposes.
Fund Balance Policy P5
Page 4 of 4
• Contract Development Services
The City's General Fund balance committed for contract development services.
Assigned Fund Balance
Amounts that are constrained by the City/Fire District's intent to be used for specific purposes,
but are neither restricted nor committed, should be reported as assigned fund balance. This
policy hereby delegates the authority to assign amounts to be used for specific purposes to the
City Manager and/or Finance Director for the purpose of reporting these amounts in the annual
financial statements. The following are a few non-exclusive examples of assigned fund balance.
• Field Rehab
Established to provide funding sufficient to regularly rehabilitate the various sports fields,
basketball/volleyball courts, and parks not fully funded by special assessments on a
rotating basis as determined by management.
• Healthy RC
Established to provide funding for the various programs and initiatives sponsored by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga to promote healthy eating and active living within the City.
Included in this reserve is funding for energy efficiency projects on City facilities
Unassigned Fund Balance
These are residual positive net resources of the General Fund and Fire District funds in excess of
what can properly be classified in one of the other four categories.
Fund Balance Classification
The accounting policies of the City/Fire District consider restricted fund balance to have been
spent first when an expenditure is incurred for purposes for which both restricted and
unrestricted fund balance is available. Similarly, when an expenditure is incurred for purposes
for which amounts in any of the unrestricted classifications of fund balance could be used, the
City/Fire District considers committed amounts to be reduced first, followed by assigned
amounts and then unassigned amounts.
This policy is in place to provide a measure of protection for the City/Fire District against
unforeseen circumstances and to comply with GASB Statement No. 54. No other policy or
procedure supersedes the authority and provisions of this policy.
P6
RESOLUTION NO. FD13- 24
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board desires
to protect existing services, and;
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board desires
to be prepared for emergencies, and;
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board desires
to maintain good fiscal management and fiscal structure to operate a municipal
corporation;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District, San Bernardino, California does hereby resolve on this 13th day
of June 2013 that the level of fiscal reserves maintained by the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District as of fiscal year end are committed to the goals as outlined in the
District's Fund Balance policy, attached to this resolution as Exhibit A.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June 2013.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
L. Dennis Michael, President
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
P7
Resolution No. FD13-
Page 2
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved
and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District, San Bernardino County, California, at an adjourned meeting of said Board of
Directors held on the 13th day of June 2013.
Executed this day of June 2013, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
i:ftnancelbudget20141City Council staff reports1resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves-Fire 13-14.doc
P8
STAFF REPORT -
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
RANCHO
Date: June 13, 2013 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director
Subject: APPROVAL OF CORRECTIONS TO AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2012/13
APPROPRIATIONS
RECOMMENDATION
It is requested that the City Council/Fire Board approve the corrections to the Fiscal Year 2012/13
Amended Budget as summarized in table below.
BACKGROUND
On May 1, 2013, the City Council/Fire Board approved the Amended Fiscal Year 2012/13
Appropriations. Subsequent to the approval of the amended appropriations, it was determined that
certain line items within the amended appropriations would be insufficient to fund the remainder of
the fiscal year. Consequently, it is necessary for staff to submit corrections to certain line items
included in the amended appropriations. The corrections as well as comments specific to each item
are noted in the table below.
CORRECTIONS TO AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 APPROPRIATIONS
FUND DESCRIPTION OBJECT DESCRIPTION AMENDED CORRECTED COMMENTS
FY 2012113 FY 2012113
General Fund- Addt'I cash
001 General 0/H 9700 Transfer Out-Fund 700 $1,283,580 $1,359,680 flow needs-
Sports Com Ix
Addt'I cash
700 Sports Complex 8001 Transfer In-Fund 001 $1,283,580 $1,359,680 flow needs-
Sports Comp Ix
290 Library Fund 9329 Transfer Out-Fund 329 $0 $502,900 Funding for 2"
Floor-Biane
329 Library Capital 8290 Transfer In-Fund 290 $0 $502,900 Funding for 2"
Fund Floor-Biane
001 General Fund- 5725 Other Expenditures $0 $15,340 IRS audit
GeneralO/H wra u
025 Capital Reserve 4725 Other Intergov't $0 $842,590 Reimb from
Reimbursement Co. Flood Cntrl
Reimb RDASA
025 Capital Reserve 9502 Transfer Out-Fund 502 $0 $1,188,540 exp denied by
DOF
025 1 Capital Reserve 1 5417 1 Gen'I Liability Claims 1 $350,000 1 $434,000 Addt'I claims
is/finance/budget2013 1 00 Counczl staff repor is/Stafi'Report-amended budget 12-13-correctionr.doc
P9
APPROVAL OF CORRECTIONS TO AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 APPROPRIATIONS PAGE 2
JUNE 13,2013
FUND DESCRIPTION OBJECT DESCRIPTION AMENDED CORRECTED COMMENTS
FY 2012/13 FY 2012/13
073 Benefits 5000 Regular Salaries $876,570 $903,120 Addt'I leave
Contingency a outs
Assessment SLID
100 Districts-Admin 5300 Contract Services $232,870 $265,750 consolidation
studies
151 SLD 1-Arterial 5403 Electric Utilities $550,550 $620,000 Addt'I costs
incurred
174 Gas Tax R&T 5650 Capital Projects $1,272,360 $1,285,730
7360
Use cash with
610 CFD 2000-03 9858 Transfer Out-Fund 858 $0 $143,879 fiscal agent to
Rancho Summit offset debt
service pmt
Vehicle/ Voicemail
Capital Oullay-
712 Equipment 5603 Equipment $132,480 $211,040 upgrade
Replacement
CFD 2001-01
860 Series A 5700 Interest Expense $422,640 $439,880
Redemption
CFD 2003-01 Refund
864 Series A 5725 Other Expenditures $0 $217,930 overpayment
Redemption
281 Fire Fund-
Administrat 5720 Misc Contrib.to City $61,590 $68,160
i on
281 Fire Fund- 5051 Unemployment $18,500 $23,000
Administration Insurance
281 Fire Fund-Station 5402 Water Utilities $1,600 $2,810
#177
282 CFD 85-1 5720 Misc Contrib.to City $30,800 $34,090
283 CFD 88-1 5720 Misc Contrib.to City $15,400 $17,040
288 Fire Protection 5604 Capital Outlay-Vehicles $1,090,020 $1,093,770
Capital Fund
FISCAL IMPACT
Generally, the above noted adjustments are funded by current year revenue growth and do not
require the use of reserves. However, some usage of reserves intended for capital outlay purposes
is necessary for the second floor of the Biane Library and the County Flood Control project. The
majority of the funds used for the County Flood Control project were reimbursed by the County in
accordance with an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County Flood
Control District that was recently approved by the City Council.
P10
STAFF REPORT -
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Date: June 13, 2013
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Fire Protection District
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director
Subject: REPAYMENT OF FUNDS ADVANCED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the repayment of funds advanced by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District upon request by the City.
ANALYSIS
Beginning in FY 1994/95 the City of Rancho Cucamonga transferred General Fund monies through
the annual budget process to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) on an annual
basis in order to provide the anticipated level of funding needed by the District to maintain adequate
fire protection services for the community. The City provided financial support for District
operations for 14 consecutive years. In total, $19,292,698 in principal and interest represents the
value of the advanced funds.
With the dissolution of redevelopment agencies statewide, special districts, which includes our
District, are now receiving additional one-time revenues that were part of prior Redevelopment
Agency reserves. Approval of this report will allow the District to, upon request by the City and
when it becomes financially viable for the District, repay the funds advanced by the City. The City
and District will evaluate when, and in what amount, the District can repay these advanced funds.
When appropriate, the City will submit a payment demand to the District until the advanced funds,
including accrued interest, are fully repaid.
Respectfully Submitted,
*- L �
Tamara L. Layne
Finance Director
i:Vnancalhudget20141City Council staff reportslCity and FD repayment or funds advanced 06-13-13.doc
P11
STAFF REPORT
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP
RANCHO
Date: June 13, 2013 C,'UCAMONGA
To: President and Members of the Board of Directors
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services
By: Tamara Layne, Finance Director
Subject: FIRE DISTRICT BOARD MEMBER MEETING STIPEND
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Fire Protection District Board approve a resolution adjusting Board
Member stipends for monthly meetings.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at the time of incorporation, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District (Foothill Fire Protection District) already existed as a separate entity with slightly
different boundaries (larger) than the City with responsibility for fire protection. In 1989, the District
and the City merged, and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District became a legally
separate but subsidiary district of the City.
Fire Protection District Law provides that a Fire District Board may receive a stipend of up to
$100.00 for monthly meeting attendance. The Governing Board of the Fire Protection District has
always received a stipend; the last time it was adjusted was in 2012 when the stipend was reduced
from $100.00 to $25.00 for each meeting attended. With the fiscal challenges that faced all public
entities, the Fire Protection District Board elected to voluntarily reduce its compensation at the time.
With the phase-out of employee furloughs beginning July 1, 2013, it is appropriate to return the Fire
District Board Member stipend for meeting attendance to its prior level. A resolution implementing
this change effective July 1, 2013 is attached to this report.
Attachment:
1. Resolution
P12
RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-'55
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESTORING BOARD
MEMBER STIPENDS
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that effective July 1, 2013 the Board of
Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District hereby establishes that each
member of the Board of Directors shall receive a stipend set at $100.00 for Board Members for
attending meetings pursuant to the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 13857(a).
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2013.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
L. Dennis Michael, President
ATTEST:
Janice Reynolds, Secretary
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Meeting of said
Board held on the day of 2013.
Executed this day of 2013 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice Reynolds, Secretary
P13
STAFF REPORT
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
RANCHO
Date: June 13, 2013 C;UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager ��t,
From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director III
Subject: APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH
GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (GASB) STATEMENT NO.
54: 1) UPDATED FUND BALANCE POLICY AND 2) A RESOLUTION COMMITTING
TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following to be in compliance with
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated Fund Balance
Policy and 2) a resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
BACKGROUND
On a regular basis, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) adopts new policies
and procedures that apply to public entities. In the prior year, GASB issued a new procedure,
Statement No. 54, which applies to Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type
Definitions (GASB 54). In order to be in compliance with GASB 54, the City Council approved a
Fund Balance Policy on June 15, 2011 and approved a resolution committing to the level of
reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
In order to accommodate any changes to these commitments that may become necessary due to
changes in operations or changes in City Council goals, staff will annually bring this policy and
resolution before the City Council for approval at the end of each fiscal year. No changes have
been made to the policy for the City's commitments. However, the policy has been updated to
incorporate a higher threshold for the Fire District's Working Capital reserve due to the continuing
shift of resources from the former RDA to the Fire District. The minimum goal has been increased
from 10% to 50% of the Fire District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year.
The attached policy is presented to the City Council for review and approval. The attached
resolution formally establishes the City of Rancho Cucamonga's fund balance commitments for the
fiscal year ending June 30, 2013.
l:inancelbudget20141City Council staff reportslGASB54-City 2013-14.doc
P14
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FUND BALANCE POLICY
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA POLICY NO.: _-_
PAGE 1 OF 4
EFFECTIVE: June 15, 2011
REVISED: June 13,2013
APPROVED:
PURPOSE
This Fund Balance Policy establishes the procedures for the reporting of unrestricted fund
balance in the City General Fund and Fire District financial statements. Certain commitments
and assignments of fund balance will help ensure that there will be adequate financial resources
to protect the City against unforeseen circumstances and events such as revenue shortfalls and
unanticipated expenditures. The policy also authorizes and directs the Finance Director to
prepare financial reports which accurately categorize fund balance as per Governmental
Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and
Governmental Fund Type Definitions.
GENERAL POLICY
Fund balance is essentially the difference between the assets and liabilities reported in a
governmental fund. There are five separate components of fund balance, each of which
identifies the extent to which the City/Fire District is bound to honor constraints on the specific
purposes for which amounts can be spent.
• Nonspendable fund balance (inherently nonspendable)
• Restricted fund balance (externally enforceable limitations on use)
• Committed fund balance (self-imposed limitations on use)
• Assigned fund balance (limitation resulting from intended use)
• Unassigned fund balance (residual net resources)
The first two components listed above are not addressed in this policy due to the nature of their
restrictions. An example of nonspendable fund balance is inventory. Restricted fund balance is
either imposed by law or constrained by grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other
governments. This policy is focused on financial reporting of unrestricted fund balance, or the
last three components listed above. These three components are further defined below.
P15
Fund Balance Policy
Page 2 of 4
Committed Fund Balance
The City Council (which also acts as the Board of Directors for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District), as the City's highest level of decision-making authority, may commit fund
balance for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by formal actions taken, such as an
ordinance or resolution. These committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless
the City Council/Fire Board removes or changes the specified use through the same type of
formal action taken to establish the commitment. City Council/Fire Board action to commit fund
balance needs to occur within the fiscal reporting period; however, the amount can be
determined subsequently.
• Changes in Economic Circumstances
The City's General Fund balance committed for changes in economic circumstances is
established at a goal of a six month reserve, or 50% of the City General Fund operating
budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The Fire District's fund balance committed for
changes in economic circumstances is established at a goal of a six month reserve, or
50% of the Fire District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. As defined in
the resolution establishing this commitment, the specific uses are listed as the declaration
of a state or federal state of emergency or a local emergency as defined in Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.36.020; or a change in economic circumstances in
a given fiscal year that results in revenues to the City/Fire District being insufficient to
cover expenditures for one or more fiscal years. The City Council/Fire Board may, by
the affirming vote of three members, change the amount of this commitment and/or the
specific uses of these monies.
• City Facilities Capital Repair
The City's General Fund balance committed for City facilities capital repair is
established at a minimum goal of 25% of capital assets value comprised of construction
in progress (excluding infrastructure), building improvements, and improvements other
than building for governmental activities.
• Fire District Facilities Capital Repair
The Fire District's fund balance committed for the Fire District facilities capital repair is
hereby committed to a minimum goal of 50% of capital assets value comprised of
construction in progress (excluding infrastructure), building improvements, and
improvements other than building for public safety-fire activities.
• Working Capital
The City's General Fund balance committed for Working Capital is established at a goal
of a minimum of 5% of the City's General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal
year. The Fire District's fund balance committed for Working Capital is established at a
Fund Balance Policy P16
Page 3 of 4
goal of a minimum of 50% of the District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal
year.
• Self-Insurance
The City's General Fund balance committed for payment of general liability claims
primarily through the use of interest earnings on the reserve but not limited to such in the
event of an unfavorable interest rate environment is established at a minimum goal of
three times the City's total yearly SIR for all types of insurance coverage.
• Employee Leave Payouts
The City's General Fund balance and the Fire District's fund balance committed for
employee leave payouts as valued in accordance with the City's labor contracts as of the
last day of the fiscal year.
• PERS Rate Stabilization
The City's General Fund and Fire District's fund balance committed to offset projected
rate increases identified in the respective annual Ca1PERS actuarial valuation for two
fiscal years after the year of financial reporting.
• Dispatch System Acquisition
The Fire District's fund balance committed to JPA membership for the District's current
dispatch system.
• Booking Fees
The City's General Fund balance committed to provide funding for an increase in the
booking fees charged to the City by the County of San Bernardino not readily
determinable at the time of budget adoption due to the delay in the adoption of the State
of California's budget.
• Vehicle and Equipment Replacement
The Fire District's fund balance committed for the replacement of fire safety vehicles
and equipment as determined based on the District's replacement criteria is established at
a minimum goal of 50% of District vehicle and equipment replacement value.
• Law Enforcement
The City's General Fund balance committed for public safety purposes.
Fund Balance Policy P17
Page 4 of 4
• Contract Development Services
The City's General Fund balance committed for contract development services.
Assigned Fund Balance
Amounts that are constrained by the City/Fire District's intent to be used for specific purposes,
but are neither restricted nor committed, should be reported as assigned fund balance. This
policy hereby delegates the authority to assign amounts to be used for specific purposes to the
City Manager and/or Finance Director for the purpose of reporting these amounts in the annual
financial statements. The following are a few non-exclusive examples of assigned fund balance.
• Field Rehab
Established to provide funding sufficient to regularly rehabilitate the various sports fields,
basketball/volleyball courts, and parks not fully funded by special assessments on a
rotating basis as determined by management.
• Healthy RC
Established to provide funding for the various programs and initiatives sponsored by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga to promote healthy eating and active living within the City.
Included in this reserve is funding for energy efficiency projects on City facilities
Unassigned Fund Balance
These are residual positive net resources of the General Fund and Fire District funds in excess of
what can properly be classified in one of the other four categories.
Fund Balance Classification
The accounting policies of the City/Fire District consider restricted fund balance to have been
spent first when an expenditure is incurred for purposes for which both restricted and
unrestricted fund balance is available. Similarly, when an expenditure is incurred for purposes
for which amounts in any of the unrestricted classifications of fund balance could be used, the
City/Fire District considers committed amounts to be reduced first, followed by assigned
amounts and then unassigned amounts.
This policy is in place to provide a measure of protection for the City/Fire District against
unforeseen circumstances and to comply with GASB Statement No. 54. No other policy or
procedure supersedes the authority and provisions of this policy.
P18
RESOLUTION NO. 13- 80
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to protect
existing services, and;
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to be prepared
for emergencies, and;
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to maintain
good fiscal management and fiscal structure to operate a municipal corporation, and;
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to maintain the
financial strength required to obtain beneficial bond ratings for the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California does hereby resolve on this 13th day of June 2013 that the level of fiscal
reserves maintained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga as of fiscal year end are
committed to the goals as outlined in the City's Fund Balance Policy, attached to this
resolution as Exhibit A.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June 2013.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
P19
Resolution No. 13-
Page 2
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an
adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 13th day of June 2013.
Executed this day of June 2013, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
Nfinancelfiudget20141City Council staff reportslresolution committing to level of fiscal reserves-City 13-14.doc
P20
STAFF REPORT -
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
RANCHO
Date: June 13, 2013 C,,UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director
Subject: APPROVAL OF CORRECTIONS TO AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2012/13
APPROPRIATIONS
RECOMMENDATION
It is requested that the City Council/Fire Board approve the corrections to the Fiscal Year 2012/13
Amended Budget as summarized in table below.
BACKGROUND
On May 1, 2013, the City Council/Fire Board approved the Amended Fiscal Year 2012/13
Appropriations. Subsequent to the approval of the amended appropriations, it was determined that
certain line items within the amended appropriations would be insufficient to fund the remainder of
the fiscal year. Consequently, it is necessary for staff to submit corrections to certain line items
included in the amended appropriations. The corrections as well as comments specific to each item
are noted in the table below.
CORRECTIONS TO AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 APPROPRIATIONS
FUND DESCRIPTION OBJECT DESCRIPTION AMENDED CORRECTED COMMENTS
FY 2012113 FY 2012113
General Fund- Addt'I cash
un
001 General un 9700 Transfer Out-Fund 700 $1,283,580 $1,359,680 flow needs-
General Com Ix
Addt'I cash
700 Sports Complex 8001 Transfer In-Fund 001 $1,283,580 $1,359,680 flow needs-
Sports Comp Ix
290 Library Fund 9329 Transfer Out-Fund 329 $0 $502,900 Funding for 2"
Floor-Biane
329 Library Capital 8290 Transfer In-Fund 290 $0 $502,900 Funding for 2"
Fund Floor-Biane
001 General Fund- 5725 Other Expenditures $0 $15,340 IRS audit
GeneralO/H wra u
025 Capital Reserve 4725 Other Intergov't $0 $842,590 Reimb from
Reimbursement Co. Flood Cntrl
Reimb RDASA
025 Capital Reserve 9502 Transfer Out-Fund 502 $0 $1,188,540 exp denieDOF d by
025 Capital Reserve h 5417 Gen'I Liability Claims $350,000 $434,000 Addt'I claims
is/finance/bud Council rSaff reporttl Staff Report-amended budget 12-13-corrections.doc
P21
APPROVAL OF CORRECTIONS TO AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 APPROPRIATIONS PAGE 2
JUNE 13,2013
FUND DESCRIPTION OBJECT DESCRIPTION AMENDED CORRECTED COMMENTS
FY 2012113 FY 2012/13
073 Benefits 5000 Regular Salaries $876,570 $903,120 Addt'I leave
Contingency a outs
Assessment SLD
100 Districts meet 5300 Contract Services $232,870 $265,750 consolidation
studies
151 SLD 1-Arterial 5403 Electric Utilities $550,550 $620,000 A
inncucu costs
174 Gas Tax RAT 5650 Capital Projects $1,272,360 $1,285,730
7360
Use cash with
610 CFD 2000-03 9858 Transfer Out-Fund 858 $0 $143,879 fiscal agent to
Rancho Summit offset debt
service pmt
Vehicle/ Voicemail
712 Equipment 5603 Capital Outlay- $132,480 $211,040 upgrade
Replacement Equipment
CFD 2001-01
860 Series A 5700 Interest Expense $422,640 $439,880
Redemption
CFD 2003-01 Refund
864 Series A 5725 Other Expenditures $0 $217,930 overpayment
Redemption
281 Fire Fund- 5720 Misc Contrib.to City $61,590 $68,160
Administration
281 Fire Fund- 5051 Unemployment $18,500 $23,000
Administration Insurance
281 Fire Fund-Station 5402 Water Utilities $1,600 $2,810
#177
282 CFD 85-1 5720 Misc Contrib.to City $30,800 $34,090
283 CFD 88-1 5720 Misc Contrib.to City $15,400 $17,040
288 Fire Protection 5604 Capital Outlay-Vehicles $1,090,020 $1,093,770
Capital Fund
FISCAL IMPACT
Generally, the above noted adjustments are funded by current year revenue growth and do not
require the use of reserves. However, some usage of reserves intended for capital outlay purposes
is necessary for the second floor of the Biane Library and the County Flood Control project. The
majority of the funds used for the County Flood Control project were reimbursed by the County in
accordance with an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County Flood
Control District that was recently approved by the City Council.
P22
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEPAR'T'MENT 91
Date: June 13, 2013 RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Enginee in Services/City Engineer
By: Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer.
Subject: Approval of Capital Improvemen Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2013/2014
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the FY 2013/14 Capital Improvement Program.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Attached for your approval is the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal
Year 2013/2014. The CIP consists of a multi-year plan for citywide infrastructural improvements. Each year,
the City budgets for"funded" projects which will occur during said fiscal year.
The CIP is a vital piece of the City's Annual Operating Budget as it dictates major capital expenditures
committed in any given year. The list of projects contained in the CIP addresses both the City's long- and
short-term capital needs. It identifies projects that reflect the desires of the community, as well as projects
that serve operational and maintenance needs.
The City's Engineering Services staff works with all Departments within the City to develop and implement an
economically feasible CIP that embodies the City's public infrastructure needs. The CIP is the product of a
wealth of planning and conceptual design taken from the City's General Plan, local residents, the business
community, local development community, and external government agencies.
The projects have been categorized by type of project (Beautification, Drainage, Facilities, etc.), and are in
alphabetical order within each category. A summary of the project costs by category along with a map
showing project locations is attached.
Projects can be funded from a variety of sources including development impact fees, state pass-thru monies
such as Gas Tax funds, grants, enterprise funds and City reserves. This year's budgeted projects total just
over$53,000,000 and will fund 61 projects citywide.
The FY 2013/2014 Capital Improvement Program was also reviewed by the Planning Commission on
May 22, 2013. At that meeting, the Commission made a finding that the CIP is in conformance with the City's
General Plan.
Respectfully submitted,
M ~
Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Attachments: FY 2013/2014 Capital Improvement Program
P23
GENERAL PLAN
POLICIES
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014
P24
BEAUTIFICATION
P25
Action
Ty pe a
d m General Plan Policy c d
u > o
O
� V � C 0 C
o o. Implementation Action(s) c a .�
a a N a N 0 u. a
Implement the Bicycle Plan pursuant to Figure CM-8. Update the Citys
Bicycle Circulation Plan in a format suitable for obtaining public funding.
Develop the planning, implementation, and design details of the bicycle
facility and amenity elements of the Community Mobility Chapter,
including the setting of implementation priorities and the identification of
both capital and operating funding sources. Implementation should
focus on adding a north-south trail along either Deer Creek or
Cucamonga Creek as a first priority.
Update the City's Trails Implementation Plan to maintain consistency A, D.
with the General Plan. ENG PL E, F, 1 4
Review City ordinances to ensure that an adequate mechanism exists to
manage the use of trails only by authorized categories of users.
Implementation of the Bicycle Plan may require traffic signalization at the
crossing of bike paths with arterial roadways to facilitate the safe
crossing of those arterials by bicyclists and pedestrians. Signals should
be convenient to bicyclists with accessible push-buttons to activate the
signal. Provide traffic control push button devices at convenient
locations for bicyclists at signalized intersections on the identified Bicycle
Network.
CM-3.8 O O Continue to encourage the provision of bicycle facilities, such as
bicycle lockers and secure bike parking,throughout the City.
Identify existing locations where bicycle lockers and secure bicycle
parking could be provided at key locations throughout put the City, and
develop a funding and implementation plan.
Encourage/require the provision of bicycle lockers and secure bike
parking for major development projects, as defined in the Development PL ENG A, D, 4
Code. E, F, H
Modify the Development Code to require provision of bicycle parking
spaces,bicycle lockers, and, as appropriate,showers for bicycle riders at
new buildings providing significant employment, at transit stations, in the
commercial districts, and at recreational destinations in the City.
Identify and implement a dedicated funding source for
CM-3.9 O implementation and completion of the Bicycle Network as identified
In the Bicycle Plan.
Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG E, F 4
CM- Continue to complete the installation of sidewalks and require new
3.10 development to provide sidewalks.
Use the CIP to identify a schedule for installing new and replacement
sidewalks throughout the City, placing priority on installing missing ENG B' C' 4
sidewalks near schools and activity centers, and replacing sidewalks that D,
have been identified as hazardous to public safety.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-24 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P26
Action
Ty pe a
u m General Plan Policy c m
C > 0
y
E Z c c A
r
c
A n
u d Implementation Action(s) E a s c o
CM- Continue to provide pedestrian amenities on sidewalks on major
3 11 O streets that are key pedestrian routes, including the provision of
benches,shade trees,and trash cans.
Identify key pedestrian travel corridors citywide, and prepare a Citywide
Pedestrian Circulation Study to determine pedestrian amenity needs,
capital and operating funding sources, and a phased implementation
program. Develop a program for gradually installing public amenities A B
such as streetlights, benches, trash containers, art, drinking fountains, ENG PL C D 5
landscaping, etc, that will enhance the pedestrian environment and
encourage increased use of transit. Use both the CIP process and other
funding sources, including a program whereby businesses or residents
may sponsor street furniture and/or landscaped areas.
CM- Continue to require that the siting and architectural design of new
312 O development promote safety, pedestrian-friendly design, and
access to transit facilities.
Develop standards to be applied to development projects along transit PL ENG 1 4
corridors that require transit and pedestrian accessibility.
Establish a number of bike hubs In the City (centralized locations
CM- O with convenient bike parking for trip destinations or transfer to
3.13 other transportation modes), at key transit nodes, and at
commercial nodes.
Conduct a study to determine the best locations for bike hubs in the City,
and develop a plan, wayfinding program, and implementation process for ENG PL, RD A' B' 4
providing bike hubs that provide secure bicycle lockers, bike racks, and C, D
connections to transit at key locations in the City.
CM- O Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to local and regional
3.14 transit,including facilitating connections to transit.
Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL 1 4
Coordinate the provision of the non-motorized networks (bicycle
CM-
CM_ O and pedestrian) with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize sub-
3.15 regional connectivity.
Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL A, E, F 4
CM- O Establish fixed-route local circulator bus service connecting major
3.16 activity centers.
Explore development of a fixed-route local circulator bus system, station ENG PL
location, and funding mechanisms.
Continue to implement traffic management and traffic signal
CM-4.1 O operations measures along the arterial roadway to minimize delay
and congestion for all modes,without adversely Impacting transit,
bicycles,and pedestrians.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-25
R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N
P27
Action
Ty Pe a
m ; General Plan Policy c
u
C d •q N �.
_ 0
m K c K c- N
IX 2 to: c
cc a Implementation Action(s) a d c
a 00:a a a rn u a
PL,AS, A B
Same actions as identified for RC-4.1 to RC-4.5. ENG CM, B ENG, S, G C, I 3
I
PW, FIN
Encourage development of transit-oriented and infill development,
PS-12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative
transportation.
Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3
Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure,and support
PS-12.4 TO public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the
potential for Bus Rapid Transit(BRT).
Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A. 1 3
Provide green building incentives, assess green building
techniques as a formal stage of project review,and develop a green
PS-12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and I
existing buildings. Adaptation strategies will also include increased
water efficiency in buildings.
Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 PL BNG A, I, K 4
Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re-use and
PS-12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a
focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers. A
Same action as identified for PF-7.1. ENG PL A 3
PS-12.7 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (Including native
and drought-resistant planting),and preservation of open space.
Same actions as identified for RC-1.1, RC-81 to RC-8.7. PL PW A, 4
PS-1 2 8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in
City operations and maintenance.
Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. AS CM. FIN. A.B. C. 4
PW E K
Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and
workshops,facilitating energy audits for residents,and establishing
PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public
awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and
businesses to become Involved in activities and lifestyle changes
that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. T, -
Same action as identified for RC-5.1. CM ENG A, K 4
Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise
environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific
PS-13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour
map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS-10)should be used by
the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-57
RANCHO C U C A M O N G A G E N E R A L P L A N
P28
DRAINAGE
P29
Action
Ty pe n
v a General Plan Policy c u
U 7 O U
C
a
`u K .E c h N
U N A
O O C
o ` a Implementation Action(s) E C. m T
a 1 N a` N 1
Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals
utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping
and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible
and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment
as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A. D 3
synchronization plans to optimize traffic Flow along the key arterial
corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure
necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system.
Continue to design and operate arterials and Intersections for the
CMA.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians.
Same action as identified for Ci 1. ENG A, D 3
CM-0.3 O Continue to Implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures
and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate.
Same action as identified for CMA.1. ENG PW E'F ' 3
Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition;
CM-0.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing
maintenance and upkeep.
Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D. 4
and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F
Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of
CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new
development,including non-automobile solutions.
Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council,
used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new
development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG Pl- D 4
improvements, and new development has been established in fee
analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed
from time to time and adjusted as needed.
Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts
CM-5.2 require associated with new development prior to project approval, and
require adequate mitigation measures, Including non-automobile
solutions,prior to,or concurrentwith,project development.
Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact
assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards.
Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4
provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance
access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools,
parks,trails, commercial centers,and other activity centers.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P30
FACILITIES
P31
Action
Ty pe a
General Plan Policy v
c d A 0
O O C i'
o .a n Implementation Action(s) E a m C
0. m a
Expand recreation and cultural attractions to enhance
ED-2.3 O tourismlvisitor potential and to boost sales and transient
occupancy tax.
Develop brochures or links from the City's web site to showcase the
various recreational and cultural venues to attract visitors to the City.
Enhancement of cultural amenities, including regional entertainment RD CS A 7
options, recreation, and historic preservation, will help to embellish the
City's reputation as a destination for a wide range of visitors.
Expand lodging choices in the City through the recruitment and
ED-2.4 O placement of full-service hotels that will complement the existing
select-service hotel portfolio.
Review and update marketing strategies (land surveys, infrastructure
availability, and modes of transportation)to solicit the development of a RD PL A,G 4
full-service lodging facility. Make sure that zoning regulations can
accommodate a full-service hotel at desired locations.
ED-3.1 O O Continue to make public safety a priority.
Use the annual budgeting process to allocate funding for public safety
services, equipment, and facilities commensurate with the City's service CM PD, FD A 6
objectives.
ED-3.2 O Provide community and cultural amenities.
Same action as identified for ED-2.3. CS CM, RD A 4
ED-3.3 O Maintain a healthy fiscal balance.
Use the annual budgeting process to check that revenues from all CM AS, FIN A, G 1
sources continue to more than match projected spending.
ED-3.4 O O improve Internal circulation for all modes of transportation,
consistent with the concept of"Complete Streets".
Same action as identified for LU-3.1 to 3.8. ENG PL K' G' 4
ED-3.5 O Facilitate development of additional local and regional
entertainment venues.
Focus a special economic development team on the task of working
towards attracting developers and investors interested in responding to RD PL A. G 6
local and regional demand for new entertainment options.
ED-3.6 O Leverage the City's quality of life amenities to attract more
knowledge-based workers.
Expand the Economic Development Strategy to market Rancho
Cucamonga's civic assets, including parks, recreation and community RD PL,CS A. G 4
enrichment facilities and programs,trails, and quality school districts.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-30 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P32
Action
Ty pe a
c3 General Plan Policy o
_ r 0 C
o0
c 'o n Implementation Action(s) E •°c
a a N
RC-8.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological,
educational,and other scientific study purposes.
Same action as identified for RC-8.3. PL ENG A, 1 4
PF 1 1 O Continue to implement high-quality standards for new public
facilities and improvements to existing buildings.
Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality
architectural treatment and green building design in all new and PL ENG A, B, C 5
remodeled civic facilities.
PF-1.2 O Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings,events,
and celebrations.
Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the
various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A, B, C 3
facil@ies to community groups.
PF-1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers
where they will serve populations with the greatest needs.
Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A 6
neighborhoods evolve.
PF-1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their
lifespan.
Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for PW CS, LIB, A, B, C 4
existing public facilities. AC
PF-1.5 O O Continue to incorporate low-maintenance features into public
facilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan.
Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PW PL,CS,
of the on-going maintenance program. BS
PF-1.6 O Maintain multi-functional, flexible, and complementary space at
community facilities.
Same action as identified for PF-1.2. CS PW
Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit
organizations,school districts,and community organizations. Look
PF-1.7 O for opportunities to create joint-use community space at facilities
owned by private organizations such as faith-based groups and
service clubs.
Same action as identified for CS-2.5. CS A 4
Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of
PF-2.1 O O joint-use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities,
to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and
education.
Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater CS SO A, K 5
optimization of school facilities to service the entire community.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-44 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P33
MISCELLANEOUS
P34
Action
Ty pe a
d General Plan Policy n
u
c -
B W m _ 0
N
Vi
p C L'
K
u _ m
Z o n Implementation Action(s) E a u C o
a a ur a` in 0�
Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City,to
CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of
Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic
Resources Chapter.
Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and
approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the
identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes
available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their
relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho
Cucamonga.
• Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway
interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway.
• Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day
Creek Boulevard. ENG A. D, 1 7
• Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and
Wilson Avenue.
• Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at
Etiwanda Avenue.
• Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from
Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek.
• Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman
Bullock.
• Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange.
• Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan
Street.
Provide an Integrated network of roadways that provides for
CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation
movement around the City.
Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4
Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway
CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan
(Figure CM-2).
Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, 1 4
funding.
CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities In all
elements of the transportation system. -
Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans
regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. ENG CS A. E. 4
Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and F, H, I
adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-19
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A G E N E R A L P L A N
P35
Acton
Ty oe a
u y General Plan Policy c a
u O u
d a a Z
A N
d K
C E N N
Z c c 2
6 C R O O
o c Implementation Action(s) E a u a .o
d G. N O. N W U-
d
Implement street design standards per this General Plan, except
that modified standards may be applied where appropriate on
CM-1.5 O arterial corridors relating to transit, bicycle facilities, sidewalks, and
on-street parking to be context sensitive to adjacent land uses and
districts, and to all roadway users, including transit, bicycles, and
pedestrians.
Integrate into the CIP process the planning of modified standards for
Foothill Boulevard to accommodate BRT and for other arterials as ENG PL A, D, 1 4
appropriate to reflect the bikeway plan and pedestrian improvements
necessary to support Mixed Use districts.
CM-1.6 O Pursue a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the
BNSF Railway line.
Grade separations currently exist at Haven and Milliken Avenues. Due to
truck traffic associated with the southeast industrial area, the City ENG PL A. E,1 4
supports creating a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and
the BNSF Railway line.
CM-2.1 O O Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide.
Implement the Bicycle Master Plan included in the Community Mobility
Chapter.
Require that pedestrian facilities and connections be provided as part of
all development projects, with an emphasis on connections within Mixed
Use districts. Implement all bicycling and walking policies and Mobility ENG PL, RD A, D. 1 4
Element components.
Preparation and distribute bike route maps and bike facilities information.
Publish and make readily available pedestrian route maps and
pedestrian facilities information.
Encourage all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles
CM-2.2 O traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and
land use approaches that provide compact and focused
development along major transit corridors.
Same actions as identified for LU-2.1, LU-5.4, LU-5.6, and CM-2.1. ENG PL A, D, 1 4
CM-2.3 O Support the use of hybrid,electric,and low/zero emission vehicles.
Continue to maintain the Green Team Sustainability Action Matrix that
identifies current and proposed efforts that procure vehicles that includes
providing gas-efficient vehicles. CM PL, A, E, F 7
Amend the Development Code as appropriate to accommodate
alternative fuel service stations and charging facilities.
CM-2.4 O Replace City vehicles with energy-efficient and alternative fuel
source models when replacing vehicles or adding to the City's fleet
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-20 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P36
Action
Ty pe n
General Plan Policy n u
5 N J
rn
K M
o o c Z.
Y m .� Implementation Action(s) E n° m c o
-6 °. a ` J w J z
o- o- rn a v, s LL a
Explore the Feasibility of Extending Local Transit Service
Explore the possibility of extending to adjacent jurisdictions in
cooperation with such jurisdictions who could also participate in funding,
if beneficial to the City.
Work with Regional Transit Operators(Omnitrans)
Develop the optimum coordination and integration of bus transit services
between the local City circulator system and the regional service.
Consult with Omnitrans to establish and maintain transit hubs at
CM-3.4 O Victoria Gardens, Chaffey College, the Metrolink Station, and other
locations as appropriate to facilitate use of transit and transfers
between transit services.
Same action as identified for CM-3.1. ENG PL A 4
Consider and evaluate the possible relocation of the Metrolink
CM-15 O Station to Haven Avenue to provide improved connections to transit
and to support planned transit-oriented land uses along Haven
Avenue.
Work with Metrolink and Southern California Regional Rail Authority
(SCRRA)to study the feasibility of moving the Metrolink Station from its ENG,
current location to Haven Avenue. Explore options for alternative funding PL RD E, F 6
from sources other than the General Fund, such as grants, and
specifically grants that promote transit-oriented development.
In addition to requiring private development to provide transit
amenities, consult with regional transit operators to provide
CM-3.6 O attractive and convenient bus stops, including shadetweather
protection, seats, transit information, and bus shelters as
appropriate.
Same action as identified for CM-3.1. Also, develop a program, with
identified funding sources, for providing amenities at bus stops in the ENG PL D 4
City.
Continue to develop and maintain a citywide bicycle network of off-
street bike paths, on-street bike lanes, and bike streets to provide
CM-3.7 O O connections between neighborhoods, schools, parks, civic
center/facilities, recreational facilities, and major commercial
centers.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GEN ERA L - L '� A-23
P37
Action E
TV Re a
m
m d General Plan Policy c m
u
c m a y
—
w O
d tY •C a'
N
.y,
E
M
T ; ^ W O O
cQ Implementation Action(s) E o
a a m a NR LL a`
Strategize with Foundation members to increase the range of CS A. H
involvement in Foundation events.
Provide a comprehensive, interconnected off-road trail system that
CS-6.1 O provides alternative mobility choices throughout the entire City and
increases connectivity.
Continue to implement the principles of the Trails Implementation Plan. PL ENG A, I 4
Connect trails in Rancho Cucamonga to trails in the San Bernardino
CS-6.2 O National Forest and other hillside open space areas. These trails
shall include trailheads with vehicle parking and other amenities.
Coordinate with Federal and State agencies to facilitate funding and CS
acquisition of trail connections from the City to the San Bemardino PL ENG A 5
National Forest. Connect new trails with the North Etiwanda Preserve.
CS-6.3 O Continue to incorporate, where feasible, regional and community
trails along utility corridors and drainage channels.
Continue to make trail connections within the City on existing public- PL CS, A 5
agency owned properties. ENG
Continue to maintain and pursue the development of planned trails
CS-6.4 O and facilities for equestrian use within the EquestrianlRural Area
designation.
Continue to ensure that trails accommodate equestrian users through
details outlined in the Trails Implementation Plan within north Alta Loma PL ENG C,B 4
and Etiwanda.
Improve existing trails by removing barriers,applying sustainability
CS-6.5 O concepts, improving safety and function, and providing access to
adjacent trails.
Continue to program funding into the CIP for the improvements to ENG PL, BS A 4
deficient equestrian trails, as outlined in the Trails Implementation Plan.
Require new development to provide access to adjacent trails and
CS-6.6 O provide appropriate trail amenities (e.g., benches, drinking
fountains, hitching posts, bike stands, and other amenities) for all
new projects located adjacent to regional or community trails.
Require new development projects adjacent to Regional or Community PL ENG A. K 4
Trails to provide access to and amenities for trails.
CS-6.7 O Continue to credit publically accessible trailway acreage towards
meeting parkland dedication standards.
Continue to allow parkland credit for trails within development projects. PL ENG A, K 4
subject to adopted criteria.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-36 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL P LA N
P38
Action
Ty pe a
w w General Plan Policy o
U
c m m 0 D
y v o
d 1 C 0 r M 1
r
F d Implementation Action(s) E °a.S' C o
0 O. M m N K IL d
Develop a listing of acceptable fire-resistant plant types to be
incorporated into new and rehabilitated development sites. PL EN G, A 3
FD
Encourage streetscape design and landscaping programs for
LU-10.4 O commercial frontages that create vibrant places which support
walking, bicycling,transit,and sustainable economic development.
Same action as identified for LU-3.4. PL ENG' A 4
RD
Consult with and coordinate with the Santa Fe Railway to develop
LU-10.5 O and install a landscape plan for the enhancement of the railroad
right-of-way.
Inventory and assess the landscaping needs of the rail corridor, and PL ENG, A 6
consult with the rail agency to develop a plan. RD
Continue to pursue strategies to reduce long-tens operation and
LU-10.6 O maintenance costs within the City's Landscape Maintenance
Districts and other publicly funded areas.
Inventory and prioritize the removal of turf areas within landscape
medians to be replaced with plantings that reduce long-term operations PW ENG A 5
and maintenance costs.
Continue to implement and update as necessary the City's Sign
LU-11.1 O O Ordinance in order to provide for a reasonable system of review
and incentives for well-designed signs throughout the City.
Establish a periodic review schedule of all City ordinances that govern
aesthetics to determine if industry standards have changed or if other PL RD A, K 4
objectives are desirable that require amendments.
Continue to require the undergrounding of utility lines and facilities
LU-11.2 O O wherever feasible to minimize the unsightly appearance of
overhead utility lines and utility enclosures.
Require undergrounding of utilities for new development. Develop a A 6
strategy and prioritization list for the undergrounding utilities in developed ENG PL C I
4
areas.
LU-11.3 O O Require communication towers to be located and designed to blend
with the surrounding environment.
Review and update design guidelines for the siting and general
appearance of communication towers to facilitate the least amount of PL A 4
visual intrusion. Emphasize use of stealth and architecturally integrated
antenna.
Ensure that streetscape design along roadways creates a strong
LU-12.1 O landscaped edge, provides a coherent high-quality appearance
along each route, and enhances the image of adjacent
development.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-13
RANCHO CU CAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P39
Action Z'
Ty pe a
c ; General Plan Policy o
7 N
y K C D E e N
u
N r O C 14
Y °1 y Implementation Action(s) E °n CL °c o
a a u d W K IL 6
PL,AS, A, B,
Same actions as identified for RC-4.1 to RC-4.5. ENG ENG, C, E, 3
CM, BS, G, I
PW, FIN
Encourage development of transit-oriented and infill development,
PS-12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative
transportation.
Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3
Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure,and support
PS-12.4 O public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the
potential for Bus Rapid Transit(BRT).
Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3
Provide green building incentives, assess green building
techniques as a formal stage of project review,and develop a green
PS-12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and
existing buildings. Adaptation strategies will also include Increased
water efficiency in buildings.
Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 PL BNG A, I, K 4
Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re-use and
PS-12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a
focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers.
Same action as identified for PF-7.1. ENG PL A 3
PS-12.7 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native
and drought-resistant planting),and preservation of open space.
Same actions as identified for RC-1.1, RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. PL PW' A. I 4
PS-12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings In
City operations and maintenance.
Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. AS CM, FIN, A,B, C. 4
PW E, K
Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and
workshops,facilitating energy audits for residents,and establishing
PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. increase public
awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and
businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes
that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Same action as identified for RC-5.1. CM ENG A. K 4
Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise
environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific
PS-13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour
map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS-10)should be used by
the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A57
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P40
MUNICIPAL UTILITY
P41
Action
Ty Pe a
e General Plan Policy c m
N m a°
a d a u rAa o
e N
r
Implementation Action(s) E a w °c
Q. Q. rn a y LL a
RC-8.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological,
educational,and other scientific study purposes.
Same action as identified for RC-8.3. PL ENG A, 1 4
PF-1.1 p Continue to implement high-quality standards for new public
facilities and Improvements to existing buildings.
Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality
architectural treatment and green building design in all new and PL ENG A, B, C 5
remodeled civic facilities.
PF-1.2 O Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings,events,
and celebrations.
Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the
various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A. B, C 3
facilities to community groups.
PF-1.3 p Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers
where they will serve populations with the greatest needs.
Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A 6
neighborhoods evolve.
PF-1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their
Iffespan.
Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for PW CS, LIB, A, B,C 4
existing public facilities. AC
PF-1.5 p p Continue to incorporate low-maintenance features Into public
facilities consistent with the City's sustainabllity plan.
Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PW PL, CS, A, B, C 3
of the on-going maintenance program. BS
PF-1.6 O Maintain multi-functional, flexible, and complementary space at
community facilities.
Same action as identified for PF-1.2. CS PW A, B, C 3
Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit
organizations, school districts, and community organizations. Look
PF-17 O for opportunities to create joint-use community space at facilities
owned by private organizations such as faith-based groups and
service clubs.
Same action as identified for CS-2.5. CS A 4
Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of
PF 2 1 O O joint-use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities,
to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and
education.
Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater CS SD A, K 5
optimization of school facilities to service the entire community.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-44 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P42
Action 8
TV pe
3 General Plan Policy n `
>
m
T Y A N O O S �'
Implementation Action(s) E a ,n °c o
Pursue efforts to reduce energy consumption through appropriate
RC-4A O energy conservation and efficiency measures throughout all
segments of the community.
As it becomes economically practical, identify sources and replace A B
imported, non-renewable energy resources with domestic renewable PL ENG, C. E, 5
energy sources such as solar and wind energy, recycled municipal solid CM G
waste, and green waste.
Promote the use of renewable energy and alternative energy
technology, and support efforts to develop small-scale, distributed
energy generation (e.g. solar, wind, cogeneration, and biomass) to
RC-4.2 O reduce the amount of electricity drawn from the regional power grid
and reduce the use of natural gas, while providing Rancho
Cucamonga with a greater degree of energy and economic self-
sufficiency.
Provided that there would not be a decline in services to City residents or A, B,
undue tax burden, use of energy efficiency and renewable energy ENG AS,CM, C, D, 6
resources will be employed for approving capital and operational PL E. G. I
expenditures.
RC-4.3 O Encourage the use of solar energy systems In homes and
commercial businesses.
Establish design criteria for active and passive solar applications within PL ENG, A 5
development proposals. BS
Reduce operational energy requirements through sustainable and
RC-4.4 O O complementary land use and circulation planning. Support
implementation of State mandates regarding energy consumption
and greenhouse gas reduction,including AB32 and SB375.
Promote land use and circulation patterns that result in multi-purpose
automobile trips and that facilitate the use of local and regional transit;
continue to advance land use pattems that provide employment and PL ENG A. 1 3
housing opportunities for City residents in a manner that allows for
practical options for mobility other than by automobile. j
Support the development of private sources of sustainable and
RC-4.5 O O environmentally friendly energy supplies, provided these are
consistent with City aesthetic and public safety goals.
Continue to make the recruitment and retention of "green" industries a RD CM.
priority in conjunction with economic development strategies. PL
Serve as a role model by adopting recognizable standards and
incorporating the use of sustainable strategies for new and existing
RC-51 O public buildings that maximize occupant health and productivity,
minimize operating costs, and provide good environmental
stewardship.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-40 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P43
PARKS
P44
Action L
Ty pe a
d General Plan Policy
0
j A p O
T O A O o C
Q a Implementation Action(s) c
o d
a
Q. U) a H It a o.
Continue to assess that the recreational needs of the City's residents are
consistent with the City's parkland standard, and determine possible re- CS PL, ENG A 4
use or conversion of infill sites for recreational uses to serve areas within
the City with a disproportionate amount of parkland.
Develop parks that contribute to active and healthy lifestyles, and
CS-1.2 O allow for a balanced commitment to both organized recreation
activities and passive park environments.
Move forward with plans to continue to develop Central Park, expand
Etiwanda Creek Park, add one new Community park, one new Special CS CM' A 4
Use Facility, and two new Neighborhood parks. Incorporate active and ENG
passive facilities into new parks.
CS-13 O Continue to develop Central Park as envisioned In the Central Park
Master Plan.
Continue to prioritize implementation of the improvements for Central CS ENG, PL A 4
Park as part of the City's CIP process.
CS-1.4 O Pursue developing an outdoor special use facility that includes a
multi-field sports complex.
Continue to prioritize development of a sports complex and determine CS ENG, A 4
funding mechanisms, including corporate sponsorships/partnerships. RD, PL
Continue to require new development to provide needed park
CS-1.5 O facilities through the various measures and tools available to the
City(e.g.,in-lieu fees and/or land dedication).
Continue to make the provision of turn-key park and recreational facilities PL ENG, A. D, I, 4
the first priority over in-lieu fees for new residential development. CS K
Pursue and expand joint-use of public lands that are available and
CS-1.6 O suitable for recreational purposes, including school district
properties and flood control district,water district, and other utility
properties.
Continue to coordinate with other agencies holding public lands for CS
possible joint-use, trail easements, or re-use to serve park/recreation PL ENG A. K 4
particularly with school district properties.
Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent uses
CS-1.7 O through park location and design, including the location of
buildings, lighting, parking, public transit, emergency access, and
pedestrian/bicycle access.
Continue to utilize the Recreation Needs and System Recommendation CS PL, ENG A, K 4
Study and the park master plan concept in park planning.
CS-1.8 O O Continue to build, renovate, and maintain parks in a manner that is
environmentally sustainable.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-32 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P45
Action
Ty pe a
m d General Plan Policy •�
0 3 m
d m m 4
m d a w rna 0
d K K 5 •y N
0 0 C �'
cc a Implementation Action(s) Q.Q. ? .0
a a rn 0. to 0: a`
Continue to provide for maintenance, renovation and new construction of
City parks in compliance with City policies, upgrading wastewater CS PL,
systems as needed, and as technology evolves, substitute material that ENG PW A. B, C 4
could reduce maintenance costs and is environmentally friendly.
Develop intermediate sized (10-12 acre) parks with lighted athletic
CS-1.9 O fields and appropriate parking to accommodate community sports
programs.
Update the City's Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendation
Study to determine the location for intermediate-sized park sites CS PL, ENG A, B, C 7
specifically developed for athletic field use. This may include joint-use
facilities with a school district.
Integrate Healthy RC activities, classes, and programs with
CS-2.1 O recreational services that contribute to the health, fitness, and
minds of participants.
Continue to provide City-sponsored recreational programs and classes at CS CIA A, 1 4
recreational centers/parks.
CS-2.2 O O Provide high-quality Community Services programs that are flexible
and responsive to the community's changing needs.
Continue to provide active recreational opportunities through leagues CS CIA A, 1 4
and organized sports.
Plan and conduct community special events that bring residents
CS-2.3 O together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote
economic development
Plan for community events through the annual budgeting process. CS RD, CM A, 1 4
Continue to consult with non-profit sports organizations and
CS-2.4 O recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational
programs that complement and supplement those of the City.
Continue to serve as a clearinghouse to coordinate among the various CS A, 1 4
sport leagues to make fields and facilities available.
Continue to make community facilities and park amenities available
CS-2.5 O for rental by community residents, non-profit groups and
businesses to meet their recreational and business needs.
Continue to promote the City's various rental facility types by ensuring
that a complete summary of locations, facilities, services, fees, and CS A 4
applications are available.
Continue broad-based public outreach activities that inform
CS-2.6 O residents of all available Community Services programs and
services, and obtain input from the community regarding program
and service needs.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
R A N C H 0 C U C A M O N G A G E N E R A L P L A N A-33
P46
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
P47
Action
T a
m e General Plan Policy c d
m a'
N
`m lz C K c a rn
N
V m Z o 0 [ T
cu Implementation Action(s) E E `o
o- a y a` (n ix LL a
Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City, to
CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of
Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic
Resources Chapter.
Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and
approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the
identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes
available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their
relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho
Cucamonga.
• Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway
interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway.
• Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day
Creek Boulevard. ENG A. D. 1 7
• Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and
Wilson Avenue.
• Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at
Etiwanda Avenue.
• Complete stone drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from
Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek.
• Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman
Bullock.
• Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange.
• Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan
Street.
Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for
CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation
movement around the City.
Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4
Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway
CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan
(Figure CM-2).
Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D. 1 4
funding.
CM-1 4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all
elements of the transportation system.
Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans
regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. A E.
Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and ENG CS F, H.
I 4
adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities.
Appendix A:Implementation Pion
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-19
P48
Action
TV Ps a
ro m General Plan Policy c
C m
m K c cma 0
N �
T V N N O O S
u m ° Implementation Actions) E a m c `o
La a y a` ti IX u o`
Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals
utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping
and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible
and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment
as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3
synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial
corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure
necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system.
Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the
CM-4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians.
Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG A, D 3
CM-4 3 O Continue to Implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures
and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate.
Same action as identified for CM-4 1 ENG PW E, �' 3
j Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition;
CM-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing
maintenance and upkeep.
Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A' D. 4
and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F
Continue to require that new development participates In the cost of
CM-51 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new
development, including non-automobile solutions.
Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council,
used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new
development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4
improvements, and new development has been established in fee
analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed
from time to time and adjusted as needed.
Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts
CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and
require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile
solutions, prior to,or concurrent with, project development.
Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact
assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards.
Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4
provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance
access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools,
parks, trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
l
P49
STREETS
P5O
Action L
Ty pe a
m m General Plan Policy
a • '� 0 u
IX C d N
_ N
T Y !0 R O O C r
m m Implementation Action(s) E a m c o
o ° — m
Q. a fn a. rn X LL a
Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City, to
CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of
Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic
Resources Chapter.
Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and
approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the
identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes
available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their
relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho
Cucamonga.
• Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway
interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway.
• Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day
Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, 1 7
• Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and
Wilson Avenue.
• Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at
Etiwanda Avenue.
• Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from
Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek.
• Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman
Bullock.
• Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange.
• Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan
Street
Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for
CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation
movement around the City.
Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D. 1 4
Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway
CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan
(Figure CM-2).
Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, 1 4
funding.
CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all
elements of the transportation system.
Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans
regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. ENG CS A. E. 4
Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and F, H, I
adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-19
P51
Action L
TV pe a
General Plan Policy a °v
c
R N 0
pC pn N
u A 6 6 c -r
u c .m Implementation Action(s) E a c o
a° a to a` w' U. a`
Implement street design standards per this General Plan, except
that modified standards may be applied where appropriate on
CM-1.5 O arterial corridors relating to transit, bicycle facilities, sidewalks,and
on-street parking to be context sensitive to adjacent land uses and
districts, and to all roadway users, including transit, bicycles, and
pedestrians. -
Integrate into the CIP process the planning of modified standards for
Foothill Boulevard to accommodate BRT and for other arterials as ENG PL A, D, 1 4
appropriate to reflect the bikeway plan and pedestrian improvements
necessary to support Mixed Use districts.
CM-1.6 O Pursue a railroad grade separation at Etlwanda Avenue and the
BNSF Railway line.
Grade separations currently exist at Haven and Milliken Avenues. Due to
truck traffic associated with the southeast industrial area, the City ENG PL A, E. 1 4
supports creating a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and
the BNSF Railway line.
CM-2 1 O O Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide.
Implement the Bicycle Master Plan included in the Community Mobility
Chapter.
Require that pedestrian facilities and connections be provided as part of
all development projects, with an emphasis on connections within Mixed
Use districts. Implement all bicycling and walking policies and Mobility ENG PL, RD A, D, 1 4
Element components.
Preparation and distribute bike route maps and bike facilities information.
Publish and make readily available pedestrian route maps and
pedestrian facilities information.
Encourage all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles
CM-22 O traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and
land use approaches that provide compact and focused
development along major transit corridors.
Same actions as identified for LU-2.1, LU-5.4, LU-5.6, and CM-2.1. 9ENG PL A, D, 1 4
CM-2.3 O Support the use of hybrid,electric,and lowizero emission vehicles.
Continue to maintain the Green Team Sustainability Action Matrix that
identifies current and proposed efforts that procure vehicles that includes
providing gas-efficient vehicles. PL AS, A E, F 7
PW
Amend the Development Code as appropriate to accommodate
alternative fuel service stations and charging facilities.
CM-2.4 O Replace City vehicles with energy-efficient and alternative fuel
source models when replacing vehicles or adding to the City's fleet.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-20 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL PLAN
P52
Action T
TV pe
Z
c ; o General Plan Policy o u
m
W j A N 0
v d = m rn a o
i `u K •� K � ._ y
V
T U R O o C
Implementation Action(s) °n a `o
a. o. rn d W W a a
Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals
utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping
and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible
and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment
as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3
synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial
corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure
necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system.
Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the
CM-4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians.
Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG A, D 3
CM-0.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures
and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate.
Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW E' �' 3
Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition;
CM-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing
maintenance and upkeep.
Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D, 4
and streets improvements per the CIP. E F
Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of
CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new
development, including non-automobile solutions.
Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council,
used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new
development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4
improvements, and new development has been established in fee
analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed
from time to time and adjusted as needed.
Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation Impacts
CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and
require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile
solutions,prior to,or concurrent with, project development.
Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact
assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards.
Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4
provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance
access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools,
parks,trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P53
Action
TV pe a
m m General Plan Policy m
c m o
m m y rna o
d K c K c .N N
o o
Implementation Action(s) E °° w °c o
o ° a v —
a IL y o. X LL IL
ED-3.7 O O Support access to local and regional educational resources that
provide educational opportunities to local residents and workers.
Coordinate with local and regional centers for higher education to RD PL, CM A 4
promote access to and programs for additional educational opportunities.
ED-4.1 O Encourage high-quality design for infill development and continue
to support new high quality uses.
Same action as identified for LU-5.1 to 5.6. PL ENG A, I, K 4
ED-4.2 O Make green building and green business a priority.
Same action as identified for LU-7.1 to 7.3. PL RD A. G 3
ED-4.3 O O Improve connectivity between development projects to create a
more cohesive atmosphere.
Same action as identified for LU-2.3. PL ENG A 5
ED-4.4 O Focus on enhancements to Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue.
Same action as identified for LU-5.1 to 5.6. PL ENG A, I, K 5
ED-4.5 O Review and understand the fiscal, job creation, and economic
benefits of new proposed uses in the City's industrial-zoned areas.
Focus a special economic development effort on assessing where re-use
or conversion of industrial properties to other uses could occur. Identify RD PL A, G 5
potential conflicts in order to develop a strategy for when such
conversions could be considered a benefit versus a cost.
ED-5.1 O Engage in regional transit planning efforts.
Continue to be involved in planning efforts to address regional
transportation solutions, particularly those providing transit options. In PL ENG A, K 4
particular, work with Omnitrans in its efforts to establish BRT service in
Rancho Cucamonga,
ED-5.2 O Continue to capitalize on proximity to Interstate 10, Interstate 15,
$fate Route 210,and the LA/Ontario International Airport.
Review and assess the effectiveness of way-finding signage to ensure
that the City's accessibility to 1-10, 1-15 and SR-210 from major areas of
City commerce hubs is easily ascertained and facilitated. Begin RD PL, ENG A, G 4
programs to improve such signage where it is deficient or confusing.
Maximize the benefits of a major airport just outside of the City's borders.
Provide adequate park and recreational facilities that meet the City
CS-1 1 O standard of 5.0 acres of parkland (including trails and special
facilities)for every 1,000 persons.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-31
P54
TRAFFIC
P55
Action L
T e a
m y General Plan Policy c m
3 >_
M3 N
N
O O C �+
d .� Implementation Action(s) E
o ° a r v
a a rn o. rn o: LL o`
CM- Continue to provide pedestrian amenities on sidewalks on major
3.11 O streets that are key pedestrian routes, including the provision of
benches,shade trees,and trash cans.
Identify key pedestrian travel corridors citywide, and prepare a Citywide
Pedestrian Circulation Study to determine pedestrian amenity needs,
capital and operating funding sources, and a phased implementation
program. Develop a program for gradually installing public amenities A B
such as streetlights, benches, trash containers, art, drinking fountains, ENG PL C D 5
landscaping, etc. that will enhance the pedestrian environment and
encourage increased use of transit. Use both the CIP process and other
funding sources, including a program whereby businesses or residents
may sponsor street furniture and/or landscaped areas.
CM- Continue to require that the siting and architectural design of new
312 O development promote safety, pedestrian-friendly design, and -
access to transit facilities.
Develop standards to be applied to development projects along transit PL ENG 1 4
corridors that require transit and pedestrian accessibility.
Establish a number of bike hubs in the City (centralized locations
CM- O with convenient bike parking for trip destinations or transfer to
313 other transportation modes), at key transit nodes, and at
commercial nodes.
Conduct a study to determine the best locations for bike hubs in the City,
and develop a plan, wayfinding program, and implementation process for ENG PL, RD A, B' 4
providing bike hubs that provide secure bicycle lockers, bike racks, and C, D
connections to transit at key locations in the City.
CM- O Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to local and regional
3.14 transit,including facilitating connections to transit.
Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL 1 4
CM- Coordinate the provision of the non-motorized networks (bicycle
3.15 O and pedestrian) with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize sub.
regional connectivity.
Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL A, E, F 4
CM- O Establish fixed-route local circulator bus service connecting major
3.16 activity centers.
Explore development of a fixed-route local circulator bus system, station ENG PL A, E, H 5
location, and funding mechanisms.
Continue to implement traffic management and traffic signal
CM-41 O operations measures along the arterial roadway to minimize delay
and congestion for all modes, without adversely impacting transit,
bicycles,and pedestrians.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-25
P56
Action L
Ty pe a
m m General Plan Policy m
C 0 O u
O 5
m c c a 0
Y c W
u ? E Z'
A .
? Implementation Action(s) w ? o r.
0
a a rn a w it U. a
Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals
utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping
and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible
and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment
as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A. D 3
synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial
corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure
necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system.
Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the
CM-4 2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians. _
Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG A, D 3
CM-4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures
and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate.
Same action as identified for CM4.1. ENG PW E: D' 3
Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition;
CM4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing
maintenance and upkeep.
Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A' D' 4
and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F
Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of
CM-51 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new
development, including non-automobile solutions.
Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council,
used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new
development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4
improvements, and new development has been established in fee
analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed
from time to time and adjusted as needed.
Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts
CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and
require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile
solutions, prior to,or concurrent with,project development.
Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact
assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards.
Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4
provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance
access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools,
parks,trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P57
FUTURE AND UNFUNDED
P58
Action d
TV Pe a
m m General Plan Policy c d
v
c n w y 0
m
`m m F w rna o
_ Ol
T yi m 0 0 C
u c y Implementation Action(s) E n w o
o a - v
a a w
Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City,to
CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, ail transportation modes, and the goals of
Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic
Resources Chapter.
Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and
approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the
identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes
available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their
relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho
Cucamonga.
• Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway
interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway.
• Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day
Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, 1 7
• Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and
Wilson Avenue.
• Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at
Etiwanda Avenue.
• Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from
Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek.
• Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman
Bullock.
• Improve the Base Line Road at I-15 Freeway Interchange.
• Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan
Street.
Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for
CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation
movement around the City.
Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4
Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway
CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan
(Figure CM-2).
Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, 1 4
funding.
CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all
elements of the transportation system.
Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans
regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. ENG CS A, E 4
Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and F, H, I
adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-19
P59
Action L
TV pe a
c ; m General Plan Policy o T
U 7
d m « v Wa
H o
W
O O C
0 o a Implementation Action(s) E c z
a a e) 1 Q. rn 0: u. d
Complete intersection rapacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals
utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping
and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible
and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment
as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A. D 3
synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial
corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure
necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system.
Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the
CM-4,2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians.
Same action as identified for CM4.1. ENG A, D 3
CM-4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures
and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate.
Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW E, F 3
Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition;
CM-4A O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing
maintenance and upkeep.
Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A. D. 4
and streets improvements per the CIP. E F
Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of
CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new
development,including non-automobile solutions.
Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council,
used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new
development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4
improvements, and new development has been established in fee
analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed
from time to time and adjusted as needed.
Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts
CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and
require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile
solutions, prior to,or concurrent with, project development.
Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact
assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards.
Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4
provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance
access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools,
parks,trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P60
Action
TV pe a
e m General Plan Policy a
c m o u
n Z 0
m C c 0 c a N
N
T V !r R O o t "
'_' m u Implementation Action(s) E a m° c `o_
B ° r. Z m
Q. a H Q. W o: LL a`
Continue to assess that the recreational needs of the City's residents are
consistent with the City's parkland standard, and determine possible re- CS PL, ENG A 4
use or conversion of infill sites for recreational uses to serve areas within
the City with a disproportionate amount of parkland.
Develop parks that contribute to active and healthy lifestyles, and
CS-1.2 O allow for a balanced commitment to both organized recreation
activities and passive park environments.
Move forward with plans to continue to develop Central Park, expand
Etiwanda Creek Park, add one new Community park, one new Special CM,
Use Facility, and two new Neighborhood parks. Incorporate active and CS ENG A 4
passive facilities into new parks.
CS-1.3 O Continue to develop Central Park as envisioned in the Central Park
Master Plan.
Continue to prioritize implementation of the improvements for Central CS ENG, PL A 4
Park as part of the City's CIP process.
CS-1.4 O Pursue developing an outdoor special use facility that includes a
multi-field sports complex.
Continue to prioritize development of a sports complex and determine ENG,
funding mechanisms, including corporate sponsorships/partnerships. CS RD, PL A 4
Continue to require new development to provide needed park
CS-1.5 O facilities through the various measures and tools available to the
City(e.g, in-lieu fees and/or land dedication).
Continue to make the provision of turn-key park and recreational facilities ENG, A, D, 1,
the first priority over in-lieu fees for new residential development. PL CS K 4
Pursue and expand joint-use of public lands that are available and
CS-1.6 O suitable for recreational purposes, including school district
properties and flood control district,water district, and other utility
properties.
Continue to coordinate with other agencies holding public lands for CS
possible joint-use, trail easements, or re-use to serve park/recreation PL ENG A, K 4
particularly with school district properties.
Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent uses
CS-17 O through park location and design, including the location of
buildings, lighting, parking, public transit, emergency access, and
pedestrianibicycle access.
Continue to utilize the Recreation Needs and System Recommendation CS PL, ENG A, K 4
Study and the park master plan concept in park planning.
CS-1.8 O O Continue to build, renovate,and maintain parks in a manner that is
environmentally sustainable.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-32 RANCHO CUCAMO N G A G E N E R A L P LAN
P61
Action D
TV pe a
c 3. General Plan Policy .o u
m
m q
d m 072 e
y c c •- N
0 0 C
0 o a Implementation Action(s) E a m c `o_
IL a V) Q. in IX a' a
Continue to provide for maintenance, renovation and new construction of
City parks in compliance with City policies, upgrading wastewater CS, PL,
systems as needed, and as technology evolves, substi PW
tute material that ENG A, B, C 4
could reduce maintenance costs and is environmentally friendly.
Develop intermediate sized (10-12 acre) parks with lighted athletic
CS-1.9 O fields and appropriate parking to accommodate community sports
programs.
Update the City's Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendation
Study to determine the location for intermediate-sized park sites CS PL, ENG A, B, C 7
specifically developed for athletic field use. This may include joint-use
facilities with a school district.
Integrate Healthy RC activities, classes, and programs with
CS-2.1 O recreational services that contribute to the health, fitness, and
minds of participants.
Continue to provide City-sponsored recreational programs and classes at CS CM A, I 4
recreational centers/parks.
CS-2.2 O O Provide high-quality Community Services programs that are flexible
and responsive to the community's changing needs.
Continue to provide active recreational opportunities through leagues CS CM A, 1 4
and organized sports.
Plan and conduct community special events that bring residents
CS-2.3 O together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote
economic development
Plan for community events through the annual budgeting process. CS RD, CM A, 1 4
Continue to consult with non-profit sports organizations and
CS-2.4 O recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational
programs that complement and supplement those of the City.
Continue to serve as a clearinghouse to coordinate among the various CS A, 1 4
sport leagues to make fields and facilities available.
Continue to make community facilities and park amenities available
CS-2.5 O for rental by community residents, non-profit groups and
businesses to meet their recreational and business needs.
Continue to promote the City's various rental facility types by ensuring
that a complete summary of locations, facilities, services, fees, and CS A 4
applications are available.
Continue broad-based public outreach activities that inform
CS-2.6 O residents of all available Community Services programs and
services, and obtain input from the community regarding program
and service needs.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RAN CH 0 CUCAMONGA G EN ERAL PLAN A-33
P62
Action A
TV Pe a
3 > General Plan Policy d
m 0
`m K c ma N
N
>, ; O O
m m Implementation Action(s) E a m `o
a
a° a` m a` rn W W a
Expand recreation and cultural attractions to enhance
ED-2.3 O tourism/visitor potential and to boost sales and transient
occupancy tax.
Develop brochures or links from the City's web site to showcase the
various recreational and cultural venues to attract visitors to the City.
Enhancement of cultural amenities, including regional entertainment RD CS A 7
options, recreation, and historic preservation, will help to embellish the
City's reputation as a destination for a wide range of visitors.
Expand lodging choices in the City through the recruitment and
ED-2.4 O placement of full-service hotels that will complement the existing
select-service hotel portfolio.
Review and update marketing strategies (land surveys, infrastructure
availability, and modes of transportation) to solicit the development of a RD PL A, G 4
full-service lodging facility. Make sure that zoning regulations can
accommodate a full-service hotel at desired locations.
ED-3.1 O O Continue to make public safety a priority.
Use the annual budgeting process to allocate funding for public safety
services, equipment, and facilities commensurate with the City's service CM PD, FD A 6
objectives.
ED-3.2 O Provide community and cultural amenities.
Same action as identified for ED-2.3. CS CM, RD A 4
ED-3.3 O Maintain a healthy fiscal balance.
Use the annual budgeting process to check that revenues from all CM AS, FIN A, G 1
sources continue to more than match projected spending.
ED-3.4 O O Improve internal circulation for all modes of transportation,.
consistent with the concept of"Complete Streets".
Same action as identified for LU-3.1 to 3.8. ENG PL A, G' 4
ED-3 5 O Facilitate development of additional local and regional
entertainment venues.
Focus a special economic development team on the task of working
towards attracting developers and investors interested in responding to RD PL A, G 6
local and regional demand for new entertainment options.
ED-3.6 O Leverage the City's quality of life amenities to attract more
knowledge-based workers.
Expand the Economic Development Strategy to market Rancho
Cucamonga's civic assets, including parks, recreation and community RD PL, CS A, G 4
enrichment facilities and programs,trails, and quality school districts.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-30 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
P63
Action
Type n
m m General Plan Policy m
c i n
m m rn a A
m W c o: c -
K Z. C c 0
a U A N O O «
'_' m° y Implementation Action(s) E a w c o
o a m
a a 0 a` u) W LL a`
PF-2.2 O Consider the needs of the school districts that serve Rancho
Cucamonga in future planning and development activities.
Continue a collaborative approach involving City and school district CS SD A K 4
facilities.
Partner with local public and private schools and Chaffey
PF-2.3 O Community College to maintain effective educational programs for
residents of all ages.
Plan for regular consultation with local public and private schools and
Chaffey Community College to identify populations that most need CS SO A. K 5
educational programs. Supplement the efforts of those agencies with
City programs as needed and as resources allow.
PF-2.4 O O Consult with school districts to explore grant funding opportunities
forjoint City and school district partnerships and programs.
Same action as identified for PF-2.2. CS SO A, K 4
Continue to provide high-quality library services to the community,
PF-3.1 O including supporting the Archibald Library and Paul A. Blame
Library.
Continue to employ short-, intermediate- and long-term strategies to A B
sustain quality library services to the community. Expand current levels C, E,
of service by expanding collections, implementing innovative programs, LIB F, G, 4
continually improving existing facilities, providing expanded hours of H
operation, and providing continuous on-line access.
Continue to Improve the local Libraries system, complete with
community facilities that provide knowledgeable, service-oriented
PF-3.2 O staff and offer access to information, books, and other materials in
a variety of formats, including emerging technologies. Consider
future options for providing library services that are flexible, and
will maximize library services while keeping costs affordable.
A, B,
Same action as identified for PF-3.1. LIB C. G, 4
H
PF-3.3 O Continue to foster pride in the Library as a place for the entire
community.
A, B,
Same action as identified for PF-3.1. LIB C. G, 4
H
Lead by example by successfully considering the full 'life-cycle"
PF-3.4 O cost for new public library facilities and Improvements to existing
library facilities.
Utilize green building approaches in the design of all new and remodeled LIB PL, BS A, K 6
library facilities.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-45
P64
Action D
T pe a
m v General Plan Policy m
U
` 0 .q 0 Z
a m a a rna 0
c
m " Implementation Action(s) E n as c `0_
' o �
IL a $A a` rn X a`
PL,AS, A, B,
Same actions as identified for RC-4.1 to RC-4.5. ENG ENG, C, E, 3
CM, BS, G, I
PW, FIN
Encourage development of transit-oriented and infill development,
PS-12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative
transportation.
Same action as identified for RC4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3
Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure,and support
PS-12.4 O public transit, Including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the
potential for Bus Rapid Transit(BRT).
Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3
Provide green building incentives, assess green building
techniques as a formal stage of project review,and develop a green
PS-12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and
existing buildings. Adaptation strategies will also include increased
water efficiency in buildings.
Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 PL ENG A, I, K 4
Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re-use and
PS-12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a
focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers.
Same action as identified for PF-7 1. ENG PL A 3
PS-12 7 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native
and drought-resistant planting), and preservation of open space.
Same actions as identified for RC-1.1, RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. PL EN A, I 4
PS-12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in
City operations and maintenance.
Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. AS CM, FIN, A,B,C,PW E K 4
Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and
workshops,facilitating energy audits for residents, and establishing
PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public
awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and
businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes
that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Same action as identified for RC-5.1. CM ENG A, K 4
Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise
environment when preparing or revising community andlor specific
PS-13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour
map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS-10) should be used by
the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility.
Appendix A: Implementation Plan A 57
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A G E N E R A L P L A N
Elm1
Beautification
Typical Beautification projects include parkway
landscape, median islands, plant material replacement, community
trail landscape and open space preservation. The City strives to plan and budget
for projects that exemplify Rancho Cucamonga's aesthetic standards, particularly in areas of the
City that are older and undergoing rehabilitation. Many Beautification projects bring these areas into alignment with the
rest of the City.
The City adheres to a Xeriscape policy in all of its plant material selection, ensuring current water conservation stan-
dards, as well as the adaptability of plants, trees, flowers and shrubs to Southern California's warm and dry climate. This
practice helps to reduce ongoing maintenance and irrigation costs.
Beautification projects are typically funded via the Beautification Fund, which is a product of new residential and commer-
cial development fees. Other examples of funding include Park Development, Capital Reserves and Park and Landscape
Maintenance District funds.
Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
Project List & FY 2013-14 Expenditures
I.Archibald Ave from N/O Norbrook $500
to Carrari- Community Trail
west side
2. Haven Ave from Wilson to Vivienda $500
Community Trail west side
Total $1,000
$1.000
■Beautification
A
PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
IL Key: 1830 P67
Archibald Avenue from North of Norbrook to Carrari Street-Community Trail West Side
Project Location:
West side of Archibald Avenue,
north of Norbrook to Carran
Street.
CARRARI ST
NORBROOK PROJECT LOCATION
Est.Construction Start/End: HILLSIDE RD
05/2015-06/2015 — - --
PMJW Status: WILSON AVE __ - WILSON�tVE
Design
Q S W
Q >
Department: TT <
Engineering
T QK Sg
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on the west side of Archibald Avenue.Project includes the installation of a two rail PVC fence,
decomposed granite and mow curbs.
Justification: This project will connect to the existing community trail at the west side of Achlbald Avenue and is part of the trail master plan.It
will also Improve the appearance of the west side of Archibald Avenue.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/14 2 14 1 2015/16 2016 17 2017/1
TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $88,200 $0 $0 $0 $88,200
Inspection&Administration 50 So 55,000 $0 $o $0 $5,000
Contingency 50 $0 $9,800 $0 $0 50 $9,800
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $103,000 $0 $0 $0 $113,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 2014/15 2015116 2 1 17 201718 TOTAL
Beautification Fund(110) $10,000 5500 50 $0 $o $o $10,500
Unfunded $0 $0 $103,000 $0 $0 $0 $103,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $103,000 $0 $0 $0 $113,500
Impact on Operations: This project will add an additional quarter mile to the City's trail system which will require trash removal,weed
abatement, and routine maintenance. However, it will also remove 1,000 linear feet of City maintained public
landscape,saving the City approximately$1,100 per year. Staff is currently seeking grant funds for construction.
A-1
P68
A Key: 1829
Haven Avenue from Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street - Community Trail on the West Side
Project Location:
West side of Haven Avenue from PROJECT LOCATION
Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street. --- +— -- -- —
v� Q
o
Est.Construction Start/End:
04/2015-06/2015 VMIENDA ST
- WILLSIDE RD
Project Status: -
Design
WILSON AVE'- _
I
Department: -
Engineering - - - - -- --- _Project Manager:Manager:
Romeo David --
Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on the west side of Haven Avenue. Project includes the installation of a two rail PVC fence,
decomposed granite and mow curbs.
Justification: This project will connect to the existing community trail west of Haven Avenue and is part of the trail master plan. It will also
improve the appearance of the west side of Haven Avenue.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013114 2014115 2015/1 2016117 2017118 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $2,000 $500 $o $0 $0 $0 $2,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction 50 $0 $111,500 $0 $0 $0 $111,500
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $2,500 $0 $0 $0 $2,500
Contingency $0 $0 $11,000 $0 $0 So $111000
Total Costs: $2,000 $500 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $127,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Beautification Fund(110) $50,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $501500
Unfunded $0 $0 $125,000 $0 SO $0 $125,000
Total Costs: $50,000 $500 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $175,500
Impact on Operations: This project will add an additional quarter mile to the City's trail Inventory, requiring trash removal, weed
abatement,and routine maintenance.
A-2
� I
Drainage
Drainage projects include the construction of
new storm drains, storm drain lateral connections, flood control
channels, catch basins, debris racks and other forms of infrastructure that protect
the public right-of-way from hazards caused by flooding and severe weather events.
Drainage projects are scheduled and planned due to the availability of funding, safety concerns, new development, and
weather/emergency events. In extreme circumstances, inadequate drainage can prevent development from taking place.
The City consults with many other agencies when constructing new drainage improvements, including utility companies,
the Cucamonga Valley Water District, the San Bernardino Flood Control District and the Army Corps of Engineers, as
needs dictate.
Drainage projects are typically funded from Drainage Funds and eligible street funding sources such as Measure I or Gas
Tax.
Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
$1.000
Project List & FY 2013-14 Expenditures
I. Hermosa Ave-Alta Loma Basin $500
to Wilson Ave Storm Drain
2. Lemon Ave- Haven to 1,300' $500
west Storm Drain
Total $1,000
■General Drainage
B
PAGE
� INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
P71
A Key'. 1810
Hermosa Avenue from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson Avenue - Storm Drain
Project Location:
Hermosa Avenue, from Alta Loma
Basin to Wilson Avenue
HILLSIDE RD
WILSON AVE
'< PR JECT LOCATI
Est.Construction Start/End:
04/2016-09/2016 m z
r z __
Q Q
Project Status: BANYAN STS stag
Design _._. __
Department: -
Engineering
r -
ProjectManager: -
Curt Billings
Description: Construct a master plan storm drain,install mainline, catch basins and manholes.The entire street Alta Loma Basin to Wilson
Avenue will be resurfaced upon completion.
Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life,use,and rideability.Also,during rain events it will provide improved
pedestrian access to the Hermosa Intermediate School at Wilson Avenue and Hermosa Avenue.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2013/14 2014115 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $500 SO $0 $o $11,000
Right-of-Way $o $0 $o $o $o $D $o
Construction $0 $0 $0 $1,900,000 $0 $o $1,900,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $o $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $45,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $2,245,000 $0 $0 $2,256,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Drainage General Fund(112) $10,000 $500 $500 $o $0 $0 $11,000
Unfunded $0 $o $0 $2,245,000 $0 $0 $2,245,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $S00 $SM $2,245,000 $0 $0 $2,256,OOD
Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and a reduction of street repair
maintenance costs for pothole and crack repairs,thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas.
B-1
P72
1L Key: 1791
Lemon Avenue from Haven Avenue to 1,300 feet west - Storm Drain
Project Location:
Lemon Avenue,Haven Avenue to
1300 ft west - w
HILLSIDE RD _ z _
WILSON AVE
Est.Construction Start/End: Q
FY 2017/18
� — PROJECT LO AT[O
Project Status:
Design .. BANYAN ST
4
Department: LEMOWAVE
Engineering
t
Project Manager:
Curt Billings
Description: Construct a master plan storm drain,install mainline,catch basins and manholes.The entire street from Archibald Avenue to
Haven Avenue will be resurfaced upon completion.
Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life,use,and rideability.Also,during rain events it will provide Improved
pedestrian access
Project Cost Estimate(S):
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015 16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 So $o $0 50 50 $0
Design/Plan Review $2,000 $500 SSW SSW $SOO $0 $4,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $1,520,000 $1,520,000
Inspection&Administration $0 So $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 $170,000
Total Costs: $2,000 $500 SSW $500 $500 $1,700,000 $1,704,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Drainage General Fund(112) $2,000 $500 $500 $500 $500 $0 $4,000
Unfunded so $0 $0 $0 5o $1,700,000 $1,700,000
Total Costs: $2,000 SSW $500 $500 $500 $1,700,000 $1,704,000
Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup,and a reduction of street repair
maintenance costs for pothole and crack repairs,thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas.
B-2
y I■ 1�yA1
F 1
Facilities
Projects that construct new buildings or that ei-
ther improve, add on to, or renovate existing buildings and ancillary
structures are typically classified as Facilities Projects. These
projects ultimately result in new structures being added to the City's fixed facility inventory;
however, some projects placed in this category are considered capital rehabilitation as they focus on the
remodeling or restoration of existing facilities.
The majority of these projects are funded via City Reserve funds. Major projects may qualify for state, federal and/or
grant funding.
Typical operating expenses for facilities include increases in staffing, building and systems maintenance costs, overhead
expenses and utilities.
Project List & FY 2013-14 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
1. Central Park - Replace Flooring $130,000
2. Civic Center- Landscape Renovation $30,000 $233.000 sno 000
Design
ttn,50o
3. Civic Center- Parking and Exterior $170,500
Lighting
4. Civic Center- Roof and Patio Re- $1,050,000 $250.000 h
placement
5. Corporate Yard -Additional $471,000 atn0sa0
CNG Compressor, Fuel
Management System,and Time Fuel a500.000
Posts
6. Corporate Yard and Sports $39,500
Complex- Retrofit Gasoline
Above Ground Storage Tanks
7. Council Chambers-Audio-Visual $300,000
Redesign ■Capital Reserves ■Fire Capital Projects
8. Cultural Arts Center- Paint Lobby $90,000
9. Fire District-Jersey Station 174 $500,000 Library Capital Reserve ■Equip/Vehicle Replacemei
Training Facility 4 FEII
10.Paul A. Biane Library-Second Floor $250,000
Rancho KIDS Project AB 2766 ❑ Law Enforcement Resery
1 I.Public Safety Building- HVAC IAQ $100,000
Total $3,131,000
C
PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
P75
A Key:
Central Park - Replace Flooring
Project Location: JU
Central Park,Goldy S.Lewis _ --- — [���j�� — - - - -
Community Center � '�HIGHI AND AVE
11200 Base Line Road
�-
PROJECT LOCATION
Est.Construction Start/End:
08/2013-05/2014 �� - Insert Project Location Map HereJ. c.
�; (Please Use Cropping Tool if Nece
PP 9
Project Status: l I f,,;y_QJ�IC E iRIC TRAIL
�11j r
�
Requested FY 2013-2014 CENTRAL ' �� L1
PARK U
Department: Q CID 0
Public Works Services
Project Manager: O� �� �n ILaJI
Ty Quaintance � RT�n � h � fln nn tl
Description: Replace flooring in the Drier Hall and the Rancho Cucamonga Hall at the Goldy S.Lewis Community Center.
Justification: The flooring in these two meeting halls are deteriorating as a result of heavy use. For safety and aesthic reasons, the flooring
needs to be replaced.
Project Cost Estimate($j:
Exuenditure/Cateeory Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 201511 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 so $0 SO $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $D $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Construction $o $130,000 $o $0 $o $0 $130,000
Inspection&Administration $o $o $o $0 $0 $0 $o
Contingency $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 2013/1 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Capital Reserve(025) $0 $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $130,000
TOUT Costs: $0 $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000
Impact on Operations: Less staff time and effort will be needed to maintain the new flooring.
C-1
P76
JL Key:
Civic Center - Landscape Renovation Design
Project Location:
Civic Center
LUI
0
Est.Construction Start/End: a ] PROJ CT LOC ION
Fall 2013-Spring 2014 rn 6 B
g
u,
Project Status; uJ
Requested FY 2013-2014 - _
Department: I --
Public Works Services
®I JERSEY f36�
Protect Manager. �-.—N,. 1� d
Dean Rodia
Description: Retrofit low water use landscaping around Civic Center.
Justification: Cost savings for maintenance and reduced water usage for irrigation.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2013/14 2014/15 201511 2015117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $30,000
Right-of-Way $0 50 $0 $o $o So $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 So $0
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $o $0 So $o
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Total Costs: $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Project Funding:
Funding Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Capital Reserve(025) $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Total Costs: $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Impact on Operations: The new landscaping will require less time and personnel to maintain. Likewise, less water will be needed to
irrigate the new landscaping. Finally,the new landscaping will comply with State Low Water Use Requirements.
C-2
P77
JL Key:
Civic Center - Parking and Exterior Lighting
Project Location: _
Civic Center Parking Lots(3) 10500
Civic Center Drive
o �
PROJ CT LO IONw
Est.Construction Stsrt/End: 66
08/2013-05/2014
W
F
v,
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014
Department:
Public Works Services
o
i
Project Manager:
Ty O,uaintance
Description: Replace the existing City Hall parking lot light fixtures with LED lighting fixtures.
Justification: Currently, there are forty eight (48)- 250 watt HPS lighting fixtures in the City Hall parking lots. These fixtures total twelve
thousand(12,000)watts. The new 140 watt LED fixtures require only six thousand seven hundred(6,700)watts.
Project Cost Estimate($j:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/ 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 2017118 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $o $0 $0 50 $0
Design/Plan Review $o $o $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 5170,500 $o $0 $o $0 $170,500
Inspection&Administration 5o $0 5o $o $o $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $170,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,5110
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Capital Reserve(025) $0 $170,500 $0 So $0 So $170,500
Total Costs: $0 $170,500 $0 $o $o $0 $170,500
Impact on Operations: The new LED fixtures consume less electricity, resulting in a reduction in utility costs. The new LED fixtures also
have a longer service life,which will ultimately result in the reduction of maintenance costs. Because of these cost
savings,the payback time for using LED fixtures is approximately 4 years.
C-3
P78
1L Key.
Civic Center - Roof and Patio Replacement
Project location: _
Civic Center
10500 Civic Center Drive
O ON
Est.Construction Start/End: —PROJEFL OCL BL.
86
08/2013-05/2014 1'
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014 �5❑ O
Department:
Public Works Services J
o
Project Manager:
Ty Quaintance
Description: Replace the existing roof and patio membrane at the Civic Center.
Justification: The roof is 17 years old and is showing signs of failure. The existing membrane on the patios are also failing. For safety reasons,
both items need to be replaced.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $1,050,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,050,000
Inspection&Administration $0 SO $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $o $o $0 $o $0
Total Costs: $0 $1,050,000 $0 $o $0 $o SLOW,"
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017118 TOTAL
Capital Reserve(025) $0 $1,050,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $1,050,000
Total Costs: $0 $1,050,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,0501000
Impact on Operations: With the replacement of the roof and patio membrane, water leakage into various offices and their time
consuming cleanup will cease.
C-4
P79
JL Key
Corporate Yard - Additional CNG Compressor, Fuel Management System, and Time Fill Posts
Project loatlon: L`�
Corporate Yard OUNTRY I
91539th Street LUB � Jul
N. . �a ❑ ° o
Est.Construction Start/End: lE153 L uuuulJ LJ a
08/2013-10/2013 JECT LO TI n�����
�00 uuu �
Project Status: % .
W of
Requested FY 2013-2014 I00 � �I
Department: I i ury -
Public Works Services -
�-Project Manager. -- --
Ernest Ruiz
Description: Compressed Natural Gas Fuel Station Expansion to include compressor,spare parts kit for compressor,fuel management system for
fast fill dispenser,5 quad time fill posts,2 light posts,concrete pad,and bollards.
Justification: The City fleet has grown In size and continues to purchase both heavy-duty and light-duty CNG vehicles.The expansion of the CNG
Fueling Station will double its output of 400 DGE to 800 DGE during an eight hour period.
Project Cost Estimate 151
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 201511 2016117 2017/1 7 TAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 So So $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $24,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $24.00D
Right-of-Way $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o $D
Construction $D $421,000 $0 $o So $0 $421,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $7,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,900
Contingency $0 $42,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,100
Total Costs: $24,000 $471,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $495,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Year 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Equip/Vehicle Replacement(712) $12,000 $233,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $245,000
AB 2766 Air Quality Impv(105) $12,000 $238,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Total Costs: $24,000 $471,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $495,000
Impact on Operations: None
C-5
P80
1L Key:
Corporate Yard and Sports Complex- Retrofit of Gasoline Above Ground Storage Tanks
Project Location: OUNTRY �1 �� 1� 111 fff
Corporate Yard&Sports Complex LUB L
�� JLLLIII LJII
Est W2on Start/End: I� JECTL TI
07/2013 3-09/-09/2013 00 LLJJ L1 LJ
Project Status: I � I
Requested FY 2013-2014
Department:
Public Works Services
Project Manager: a I�
Ernie Ruiz
Description: Replace existing Phase I emergency vent valves,install Enhanced Vapor Recovery(EVR)overfill prevention valves,new EVR drop
tubes,new EVR fill adapters with lockable dust caps,and install EVR top fill spill containers,etc.
Justification: Currently,Above ground Storage Tanks(AST)meet California Air Resources Board Enhanced Vapor Recovery(GARB EVR)Phase 1
regulations. GARB regulations require AST to be upgraded to meet new EVR Phase II regulations by end of 2014.
Project Cost Estimate(SI:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO
Design/Plan Review $0 $o $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $o $o $0 $o $o $0
Construction $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000
Contingency $0 $3,500 $0 $0 $o $o $3,500
Total Costs: $0 $39,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
AB2766 Air Qual lmprv(105) $0 $39,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,500
Total Costs: $0 $39,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 539,500
Impact on operations: There will be temporary restrictions for use of the AST s while they are being brought into compliance with CARB
EVR phase It regulations.
C-6
1L Key: P81
Council Chamber - Audio-Visual Redesign
Project Location:
Civic Center City Council Chamber - - ���•
10500 Civic Center Drive
s I C1
Est.Construction Start/End: ( PROJ CT LOC ION
Fall/Winter 2013 88
a
a o
w
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014 ❑
T
Department: lJ
Public Works Services
Project Manager. ,gel�.� �-, �� � �,
Bill Wittkopf
Description: Redesign of the audio-visual system in the City Council Chambers.
Justification: The existing audio-visual system has been failing on a regular basis- microphones go silent,electric vote tabulator stops working
during meetings requiring council or commission members to hand vote,feed to meeting broadcast is disrupted,etc.
Project Cost Estimate(SI:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 5o $o $o $o $o $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $o $4 $0 $0
Construction $0 $300,000 50 $0 5o $0 $300,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $o $o $o $0
Contingency $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 20171 TOTA
Capital Reserve(025) $0 $300,000 $0 $o $0 $o $300,000
Total Costs: $0 $300,000 $o $0 $o $o $300,000
Impact on Operations: With a fully functional audio-visual system, council/commission meetings will go smoother, disruptions of the
electronic meeting broadcast will cease,and the cable system will a receive consistent feed.
C-7
P82
JL Key:
Cultural Arts Center - Paint Lobby
Project Location: �� {
Cultural Arts Center j
12505 Cultural Center Drive
RAL ENT
Q a
Est.Construction Start/End:
08/2013-05/2014 PROJECT LOCjfTlON
J
Project Status: U
Requested FY 2013-2014 V
}
Department: Q
Public Works Services
Project Manager:
Ty Quaintance
Description: Paint main lobby and walls along main staircase of Culteral Arts Center(CAC).
Justification: The Cultural Arts Center(CAC)building has been open for six(6)years. High traffic from public attendance of various Community
Services Department events has diminished the appearance of these areas. A new coat of paint will restore luster to these public
areas.
Project Cost Estimate I$):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 2017/1 T TAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 5o $0 $0 $o So 50
Design/Plan Review $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $o $0 50 50
Construction $0 $90,000 $0 $0 $p $0 $90,000
Inspection&Administration 5o $0 $0 $0 $0 50 50
Contingency So $0 $0 $0 $o $0 So
Total Costs: $D $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Capital Reserve Fund(025) $0 $90,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $90,000
Total Costs: $0 $90,000 $0 $0 $o $o $90,000
Impact on Operations: Painting will be scheduled around the Community Services Department theater season to minimize impact.
C-8
P83
JL Key: 1735
Fire District-Jersey Station 174 Training Facility
Project Location: `
Jersey Station(174)
11297 Jersey Boulevard ( 88 a
w. s.
waL a�
Est.Construction Start/End: P OJEC LO ATION
2014/15-2015/16
Project Status:
RFP for Architect for Design
7
Department:
Fire Protection District
Project Manager: ��, •
Chief Cloughesy/Pamela Pane
Description: Design concepts only of a training facility for the Fire Protection District at Fire Station 174.
Justification: A training facility has been included In the current and previous Strategic Plan and has been part of the Jersey Station Master Plan since Its
inception. Several multi-story hotels have been constructed and additional mid-rise professional offices are proposed in the future
necessitating this training tower. It will Include expanded classrooms,a live bum building,multi-story training building and other props.
Could potentially Include a Dispatch component and back-up Emergency Operations Center(EOC).
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $D $0 $o $0 $o
Design/Plan Review $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Right-of-Way $0 $o $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $10,000,000 $0 $o $0 $10,000,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO
Contingency $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $500,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,500,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Fire Capital Projects(288) $0 $500,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,500,000
Total Costs: $0 $500,000 $10,000,o0o $0 $0 $0 $10,500,000
Impact on Operations: Fire District operations and maintenance costs will Increase. The cost wil be better determined after the design
phase is complete. Opportunities may exist for regional partnerships that could help affect operational costs.
C-9
P84
1L Key: 1867
Paul A. Biane Library - Second Floor Rancho KIDS Project
Project Location:
Paul A.Biane Library CHURCH STREET
12505 Cultural Center Drive . . - _
a
0
a
PROJECT LOCATION a
Est Construction Start/End:
FY 2013/14
1 _
: p
Project Status: I �� cvcrox,u I°'—• - �usr r�woo
Design/Construction InmrwwxnoswcrvR — ccnvea •+xvcr�
°'.LIBRAR II
Department:
Library _ ltlt
r (_
Como
Project Manager:
Robert Karatsu = _IL
Description: Rancho KIDS is a project that will build out the second floor of the Paul A. Biane Library at Victoria Gardens. Rancho KIDS is
envisioned as an interactive children's museum combined with traditional library services to create a new type of learning
experience for children ages 0-7(and their parents)in our community.
Justification: Demand for library services in the community continues to increase,particularly for the ages 0-7. Rancho KIDS is being designed
to provide a new,unique service model that will combine the features of interactive children's museum exhibits with traditional
library services. Rancho KIDS should also be a regional draw that will provide additional visitors to both the Victoria Gardens
Shopping District and the Lewis Family Playhouse.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Lenditure/Category Prior years 2013114 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $90,000 $250,000 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $490,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $3.500,000 $0 $5,500,000
Inspection&Administration $o $o $0 $o $0 $0 $o
Contingency $0 $o $200,000 $0 $300,000 $0 $500,11110
Total Costs: $90,000 $250,000 $2,200,000 $150,000 $3,800,000 $0 $6,490,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Library Services Fund(290) $90,000 $0 50 $0 $o $o $90,000
Library Capital Reserve(329) $0 $250,000 52,200,000 $150,000 $3,800,000 $0 $6,400,000
Total Costs: $90,000 $250,000 $2,200,000 $150,000 $3,800,000 $0 $6,490,000
Impact on Operations: Feasibility study projects an approximate$250,000 per year cost for operations and maintenance. (The project is
designed to be revenue-generating.)
C-10
P85
JL Key:
Public Safety Building - HVAC IAQ
Project Location:
Public Safety Building „ �,
�
10510 Civic Center Drive IuILJLJ �� U UU o
a � Qa �
Ooh O
Est.Construction Start/End: PROJ CT I OC ION
08/2013-05/2014 66
Project Status: O
Requested FY 2013-2014
O F
Department:
Public Works Services
o J L
Project Manager:
EEEF-
Ty Quaintance
Description: Mechanical design and specifications for altering Air Handlers 1 and 2,which are located in the Public Safety building.
Justification: The intake and exhaust systems of Air Handlers 1 and 2 need to be redone to meet current standards.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 201511 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Inspection 8,Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Contingency $o $o $0 $0 $0 $o $0
Total Costs: $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Law Enforcement Reserve(017) $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Total costs: $0 $100,000 $o $0 $o $0 $100,000
Impact on Operations: None
C-11
PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
P87
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous projects are the capital
undertakings that do not qualify for classification into the other pro-
ject categories. These are often one-time projects that are prompted by factors
such as:
- State or Federal Mandates
- Community Health and Safety Issues
- Council Goals and Priorities
- Regional Needs Assessments
- Interagency Agreements
- External Funding Arrangements
These projects may or may not have maintenance obligations and they are typically funded from a variety of special fund-
ing sources; they are rarely funded via the General Fund.
Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
$300,000
$392.200
Project List & FY 2013-14 Expenditures
$2 52,200
I.ADA Ramps at Various Locations $300,000
2.Arrow Route Utility Underground $1,000
3. Base Line Rd @ 1-15 - Utility $500,000 $561,170
Underground
4. Base Line Rd Utility Underground $554,570
- Carnelian to Vineyard $1,000,000
5. LED Street Light Enhancement $1,000,000
Project $125,000
6. Pacific Electric Trail @ Day Creek $275,000
Channel Connection
Total $2,630,570 ■Underground Utilities ■Transportation
E]Citywide Infrastructure ■SLID 8
■ Measure "I" Ped Grant Article 3
D
PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
P89
IL Key: 1150
Americans With Disabilities Act- Ramps at Various Locations
Project Location:
Various locations City Wide �-
Est.Construction Start/End: t
01/2014-02/2014 t
Project Status:
Design and Construction
•:
Department:
Engineering
PROJECT LOCATION:
CITY W I D E
Project Manager:
Curt Billings
Description: Construct Americans With Disabilities Act(ADA)compliant ramps at various locations citywide. Locations for ramp installations
come from the ADA Transition Plan,which is updated annually.This capital project encompasses all ADA compliance issues that
cannot be incorporated into other improvement projects,but must be addressed in a timely fashion.
Justification: Meets the City's ongoing commitment to install ADA ramps where they are missing and are required by law.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/ 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $0 $o $0 $0 $o
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $5,400 $5,400 $5,400 $16,200
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $2,000 $268,000 $0 $86,000 $86,000 $86,000 5528,000
Inspection&Administration $o $12,000 $0 $0 $0 so $12,000
Contingency $0 $20,000 $o $8,600 $8,60) $8,600 $45,800
Total Costs: $2,000 $300,000 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $602,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Year 2013/14 2014/15 201511 2016/17 201711 TOTAL
Measure I Fund(176) $D $1001000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Measure I Fund(177) $2,000 $200,000 $o $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $502,000
Total Casts: 52,000 $300,000 $o $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $602,000
Impact on Operations: None
D-1
P90
IL Key- 1777
Arrow Route Utility Underground - Bear Gulch to West of Archibald Avenue
Project Location:
Arrow Route from Bear Gulch to %)
west of Archibald Avenue
FOOTHILL BLVD
Est.Construction Start/End: i
09/2013-03/2015 S u i
ARROW ROUTE
Project Status: i
Budget 9TH STREET PROJECT LOCATION
c
Department: YARD
Engineering _ _ _._�...._... .-.._........... . . ..-.......-..- ._.�._.
Project Manager:
Walt Stickney
Description: This project will underground a stretch of existing overhead utilities along Arrow Route from Bear Gulch to west of Archibald
Avenue.
Justification: The removal of the overhead utilities,by placing them underground,improves the aesthetic appearance of the area.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Catenory Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $1,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $16,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $D $0
Construction $0 $0 $626,690 $0 $o $0 $626,690
Inspection&Administration $o $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Contingency $o $0 $62,670 $0 $o $o $62,670
Total Costs: $0 $1,000 $719,360 $0 $o $0 $720,360
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017 TOTAL
Underground Utilities(129) $o $1,000 $719,360 $0 $0 $0 $720,360
Total Costs: $0 $1,000 $719,360 $0 $0 $0 $720,360
Impact on Operations: None
D-2
P91
JL Key: 1848
Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Utility Underground
Project location:On Base Line Road between
Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue
PROJECT
LOCATION i
/
Est.Construction Start/End:
08/2013-10/2013
FRD
1 c
Project Status: � i
Design and Construction
Department: N
Engineering I n LLJ
Project Manager:
W Stickney
Description: The project places overhead utilities undground in the vicinity of the Base tine Road at I-15 Interchange.
Justification: In coordination with the improvements to the Base line Road at 1-15 Interchange being proposed for FY 2013/14,the overhead
SCE lines on Base Line Road and East Avenue will be placed underground.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Exoenditure/Categon Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017118 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $o $0 $o $0 $o $o
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $500,000 SO so $0 $0 $500,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $o 50
Contingency $0 5o 50 50 $0 5o $0
Total Costs: $0 $500,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $500,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Transportation(124) $0 $252,200 $0 $0 50 $0 $252,200
Underground Util(129) $0 $5,600 $0 $o $0 50 $5,600
City-wide Infrastructure(198) $0 $242,200 $0 $0 $0 $o $242,200
Total Costs: $0 $500,000 50 $0 $0 $0 5500,000
Impact on Operations: None
D-3
P92
J Key: 1776
Base Line Road Utility Underground - Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue
Project location: 19TH ST
Base Line Road from Carnelian �— -
Street to Vineyard Avenue —
N Q N Q Z
Y 2 �¢
z
Est.Construction Start/End:
07/2014-03/2015 n l BASE LINE RD
0 AR
Project Status: RED
HILL _ —
Budge[ °O ARK N PROJECT LOCATION
Department: /' , CHURCH ST
Engineering - /_ ., Z
NRE 5 Project Manager:
Jerry A.Dyer
Description: This project will underground a stretch of existing overhead utilities along Base Line Road from Carnelian Street to Vineyard
Avenue.
Justification: The removal of the overhead utilities by placing them underground improves the aesthetic appearance of the area.
Project Cost Estimate(S):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $0 50 $0 50 so
Design/Plan Review $0 $10,000 50 $o So $o $10,000
Right-of-Way $o So So 50 $0 $0 W
Construction $0 $481,420 $0 $o $0 $0 $481,420
Inspection&Administration $o $15,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $15,000
Contingency 5o $48,150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,150
Total Costs: $0 $554,570 $o $0 $0 $0 $554,570
Project Funding:
Fundin�._Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/1 2017/1 TOTAL
Underground Utilities(129) $0 $554,570 50 So So $0 $554,570
Total Costs: $0 $554,570 $0 $0 $0 $0 $554,570
Impact on Operations: None
D-4
P93
Project Number:
JL Key: 1866
LED Street Light Enhancement Project
Project Location: — —— -
Street Lighting District#8 J
G�
VIC HA
Est.Construction Start/End: ICTOR Q
10/2013-01/2014
����1JE�ClTJ'
Project Status: U JQ�A�T 1 JN
Construction
'8
Department: TA IJ
Engineering s 6
CENTER
Project Manager:
W Stickney
Description: Replace the existing street light cobra head fixtures to LED.
Justiflcation: In coordination with Southern California Edison replacing the existing street light cobra fixtures to LED will result in annual energy
savings,which will pay for the one-time investment over time.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 201611 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 s0 $0 $0 $o $0 50
Design/Plan Review $0 so $0 so so $0 50
Right-of-Way $0 s0 $0 so $0 50 $0
Construction $0 $1,000,000 $0 s0 $0 s0 $1,000,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: s0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $1.000.000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Year 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
SLD#8(158) $o $1,000,000 50 $o s0 so $1,000,000
Total Costs: $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 s0 $0 $1,000,000
Impact on Operations: Overall annual energy savings.
D-5
P94
1L Key: 1827
Pacific Electric Trail at Day Creek Channel Connection
Project Location:
J
Pacific Electric Trail at Day Creek ��� v
Channel
.s.
1
PKRK
C r
Est.Construction Start/End:
11/2013-01/2014 vK: na JECT LOC 1
O NARK
Project Status:
Construction
Department: O o no
Engineering
CD
C7
Project Manager:
Walt Stickney K
Description: The project will connect the Pacific Electric Trail with the Day Creek Channel path.
Justification: The City and County have worked out an agreement which will permit the pedestrian use of the Day Creek Channel maintenance
path. This project will tie that channel path into the existing Pacific Electric Trail.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 201611 2017118 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $36,600 $0 $o $o So $0 $36,600
Right-of-Way $o $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Construction $o $250,0D0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Contingency $0 $25,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Total Costs: $36,600 $275,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $311,600
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
City-wide Infrastructure(198) $36,600 $150,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $186,600
Ped Grant Article 3(214) $0 $125,000 $o $0 $0 So $125,000
Total Costs: $36,600 $275,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $311,600
Impact on Operations: Maintenance will be minimal. The connection will be a durable surface such as concrete which will require
sweeping.
D-6
- P95
Y"
G -
Municipal Utility
The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility
(RCMU) was formed by the City Council in 2001 in response to the
California Energy Crisis of 2000-2001. RCMU served its first customers in 2003
and finished construction of the Victoria Arbors substation in 2004. Currently, RCMU services
approximately 500 customers in its service area. Annually, more than 72,000 megawatt-hours of electricity are
distributed to our customers via 20 circuit miles of wire spread across the roughly 4-square miles of service territory.
RCMU's historical peak demand is 17.5 megawatts, set in August 2011.
RCMU capital projects are related to the maintenance, expansion and improvement of the RCMU distribution system.
RCMU's distribution system was designed to minimize maintenance and operating costs and ensure maximum reliability
of service.
Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
$469,040
Project List & FY 2013-14 Expenditures
1 P
1. Church Street- Line Extension $469,040
from Bass Pro to Etiwanda(Service
for Lennar Housing Tract)
Total $469,040
■ Municipal Utility
E
PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
P97
JL Key: 1857
Church Street - Line Extension from Bass Pro Shop to Etiwanda Avenue
Project Location:
Church Street from Bass Pro Shop
to Etiwanda Avenue
Q
/ /m BASE LINE RD /
W
w /VICTORIA
Est.Construction Start/End: cc GARDENS PROJECT
07/2013 -09/2013 y LOCATION-
/ / �®
Project Status: /
Design/Construction CHURCH ST
BASS PRO /
Department: /VICTORIA/ SHOP
Engineering GARDENS
Project Manager: GARCIA
Fred Lyn ViOTONIP
Description: Distribution Line Extension east of the 1-15 Freeway to service Lennar Housing Tract with electricity.
Justification: Line extension is needed to extend power service to new residential construction.Once lines are extended, Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Utility(RCMU) will also have accessibility to run lines down Etiwanda Avenue to service vacant parcels on the corner of
Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The City paid SCE exit fees for the right to service vacant parcels never served by Edison;
these all fall under that category. The return on investment for the line extension cost will be around 8 years for this project;
RCMU believes this is a good turnaround period to pursue this project.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/1 2014115 2015/1 2016117 2017118 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $2,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $456,540 $0 $0 $0 $0 $456,540
Inspection&Administration $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $469,040 $0 $0 $0 $0 $469,040
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Municipal Utility(Fund 705) $0 $469,040 $0 $0 $0 $0 $469,040
Total Costs: $0 $469,040 $0 $0 $0 $0 $469,040
Impact on Operations: The increased customer base will provide additional revenue to RCMU.
E-1
PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
P99
BnSKETBnLL ,SGMY• OGEE
COLRf CLAY Y .
Parks
Any capital project that is located in, on, or
adjacent to a park is classified as a Park Project. These include the
construction of new park facilities, as well as the expansion or rehabilitation of
existing park facilities. Improvements include playing fields, play ground equipment, park land-
scaping, other miscellaneous recreational amenities, restroom facilities and parking lot improvements.
Many of these projects require ongoing maintenance, and all field rehabilitation projects and renovations are performed
on an annual or bi-annual basis due to extensive wear from local league play.
The majority of Park Projects are funded via the Park Development Fund, which is collected through park development
fees, park improvements are also funded through grants and Special District funds.
Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
Project List& FY 2013-14 Expenditures
$36,100
I. Central Park- Hardscape& Landscape $25,000 $50.000
Improvements
2. Coyote Canyon Park-ADA& CPSC $150,000
Improvements
3. Etiwanda Creek Park- Sidewalk $25,000 $300,000
Improvements $283500
4. Legacy Park- Playground Seat Wall $20,000
5. LMD 4R - Lighting Retrofits (Milliken, $150,000
Mountain View, Ralph Lewis and West
Greenway Parks) 0
6. Rancho Summit Park - Restore Play $16,100
ground Rubber Surface
7. Southwest Cucamonga Park $283,500 ■LMD 411 ® Prop 84 State Grant
Total $669,600
■ Park Development CFD 2002-03
F
PAGE P'
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
A Key. 1803 Pi 01
Central Park - Hardscape and Landscape Improvements
Project location:
Central Park _
- `� HIGHLAND AVE.
11200 Base Line Road r
p _ PROJECT LOCATION
Est.Construction Start/End: w y �JZ1 vIcTr .:
07/2013-10/2013 .LIT J
6 TRIC TRAIL _
Project Status: l
Design/Construction C Ep A R K L (�(� w
Department:
1-
CommunityServices/Parks
Project Manager:
Karen McGuire-Emery
Description: This project will modify hardscape and landscape at Central Park to accommodate the Pavilion Project.
Justification: This project is necessary to repair and replace improvements at Central Park.
Project Cost Estimate(Sh
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 201311 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017 18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPOES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 50 $o $0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $75,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Inspection 8,Administration $0 $0 5o $0 $o $0 $o
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0
Total Costs: $75,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $100,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Park Development(120) $75,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Total Costs: $75,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Impact on Operations: This project will require maintenance such as cleaning and replacing any damaged portions as needed.
F-1
P102
It Key: 1859
Coyote Canyon Park - Playground ADA and CPSC Improvements
Project location: '
Coyote Canyon Park X1 icr-r-mir,
10987 Terra Vista Parkway EENTRAL®
PARK �1i
�( E I I (E RD ��--�
Est 013-11/201 Start/End: all
09/2013-11/2013 U� "I4J(
_ i
Project Status: COYOTE rzRRA
Construction CANY aEE
C
PIT.
Department: r
MNR
Community Services/Parks RLIKEN
SPRUCE AVE vA«�
PAR«
Project Manager: n PR ECT LOCATION /
Karen McGuire-Emery
Description: This project includes the installation of new playground equipment which complies with current Consumer Products Safety
Commission(CPSC)and Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)Standards at Coyote Canyon Park.
Justification: This project will Improve accessibility and safety.
Project Cost Estimate(S):
Expenditure/Cateeory Prior Year 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $o $0 $o $0 $0 $o
Construction $o $150,000 $o $0 $0 $o $150,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o
Contingency $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $150,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
LMD 4R(Fund 134) $o $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 S15o,00o
Total Costs: So $150.000 $0 $0 So So 5250,000
Impact on Operations: This project reduces the amount of maintenance performed on playground equipment.
F-2
P103
IL Key. 1561
Etiwanda Creek Park -Sidewalk Improvements
Project location:
Etiwanda Creek Park 5939
East Avenue
o�
Est.Construction Start/End::
PROJECT LC CATIONi
7/2013-9/2014
emvuw EfIWAapA �-� ,
6EMEMMV f:RFEI(PMa �.
Project Status:
sown o
Design mHww
1�
Department: I
Community Services/Parks IL /
a
Project Manager:
Karen McGuire-Emery nr11 i, r� r-II I'1 �1r=1 jig
Description: This project Involves the modification of existing sidewalks and provisions for new sidewalks to accommodate ADA standards.
Justification: Currently,there is no sidewalk access to the north side of the soccer/football fields. In addition,the sidewalks and access points
in the dog park are not accessible from the parking lot.
Project Cost Estimate(S):
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2 17 18 TOTA1
Environmental/NPDES So $0 fA $o $D So $D
Design/Plan Review $o $25,000 $0 $o So So $25,000
Right-of-Way $o $0 $o $o $o So $0
Construction $0 $0 5305,000 $0 $0 $0 $305,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 50 $20,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Park Development(120) $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $25,000
Unknown $0 $0 $325,000 $0 $0 $o $325,000
Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
Impact on Operations: Completion of this project will allow access to the soccer/football fields,as well as the dog park area to comply
with ADA standards.
F-3
JL Key: • 1 04
Legacy Park - Playground Seat Wall
Project location:
Legacy Park
5858 Santa Ynez Place - - WILSON
PROJECT
LOCATION ��_—•i I
AC
ETIWANDA
Est.Construction Start/End: LE EN V
VOUN
08/2013-05/2014 SUMMIT
NTERMM��pp��ATE i
JRTA6N f •/•� �
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014 i
K
Department x
w
Public Works Services =
J U
Project Manager: 1
Dean Rodia
Description: Construct a seat wall around the playground.
Justification: Seat wall will confine sand within playground and prevent erosion from adjacent landscaping from entering the playground.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Year 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 So $0 SO so $0 50
Design/Plan Review SO 50 $0 So 50 $0 $0
Right-of-Way S0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $20,000 $0 50 $o So $20,000
Inspection&Administration $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
CFD 2002-03 Park Maint(868) $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $20,000
Total Costs: $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Impact on Operations: Seat wall will decrease maintenance and the crews no longer need to replace lost sand or clean up erosion that
entered playground area.
F-4
P105
1L Key: 1858
LMD 411 - Lighting Retrofits at Various Parks
Project Location:
Milliken Park,Mountain View Park,
Ralph M. Lewis Park and West
Greenway Parkin LMD 4R.
Est.Construction Stark/End: @ l
08/2013-06/2014 i
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014
scaue NONE
Department:
Public works Services PROJECT
( LOCATION
Project Manager:
Dean Rodia
Description: Remove existing park lighting fixtures and replace with Spaulding inductive lighting fixtures
Justification: The existing park lighting fixtures are nearing the end of their service life. The new Spaulding inductive lighting fixtures use only
one third the amount of electricity and have a longer service life while maintaining the same level of illumination.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 201311 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 2017118 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $d $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $150,000 $o $0 $o $0 $150,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $150,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $150,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
LMD 4R Terra Vista(134) $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Total costs: $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Impact on Operations: The new inductive lighting fixtures with their longer service life and lower electricity usage will significantly reduce
the cost of park light maintenance in LMD 4R.
F-5
P106
A Key:
Rancho Summit Park - Restore Playground Rubber Surface
Project Location: r i
Rancho Summit Park 5958
Soled O ad Way _ WILSONE—'—CrtY
ti.T-s PROJECT
LOCATION �i —•i I 10E
WA y'ETIWANDA
SUE EN ._,REEK PARK f `%
Est Construction Start/End: SUMMIT roux
• NT SUMMIT j
08/2013-05/2014 ,IR7A6R (•J�
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014 lY
W
/ W
Department: —� U
Public Works Services
1
Project Manager:
Dean Rodia F n"m
Description: Extensive use has resulted in existing rubber surface being worn away throughout playground area. Pits and uneven surfaces have
resulted. This project will restore a uniform rubber surface.
Justification: Pits and uneven surfaces are hazards to playground users. Also,State playground codes require uniform rubber surface to meet
Americans With Disabilities Act(ADA)requirements.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013114 2014115 2015/16 201611 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES SO $0 $o So $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review 5o $a $o So 50 So 50
Right-of-Way $0 50 $0 $0 5o So So
Construction $D $16,100 $o 50 50 $0 $16,100
Inspection&Administration $o 50 $0 50 So $0 $0
Contingency So $0 So $0 $0 $0 So
Total Costs: $o $16,100 $0 50 50 $0 $16,100
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/1 TOTAL
CFD 2002-03 Park Maint(868) $0 $16,100 $0 $0 $0 50 $16,100
Total Costs: $0 $16,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,100
Impact on Operations: Uniform rubber surface for playground will result in less maintenance. Temporary repairs will no longer be
needed.
F-6
P107
JL Key: 1754
Southwest Cucamonga Park- New Park
Project Location:
East side of Madrone Avenue a
between Arrow Route and 9th
Street Ts.
s's nnr
Est.Construction Start/End: OB D l�l
03/2014-12/2014 n lUl
Pr Status: �oo PRO ECT OCATION
Preliminary Grant Awarded �f
11/1/2010 Full Grant Expenditure on Hold �Pending Property Transfer From uwip n RDA
=T
Department: p 7 ❑
Community Services
CITY LIMITS 8TH ST
Project Manager:
Karen McGuire-Emery
Description: The City was awarded $3,941,136 to design and construct a 3.4 acre neighborhood park for the local residents in Southwest
Cucamonga.
Justification: No other neighborhood park within a 1/2 mile radius. Park will serve low income neighborhood.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/1 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $2,282.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2.282
Design/Grant Prep $67,772.00 $283,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $351,272
Site Remediation $40,000.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
Construction $0.00 $0 $3,469,910 $0 $0 $0 $3,469,910
Inspection&Administration $0.00 $0 $165,180 $0 $0 $0 $165,180
Contingency $0.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $110,054 $283,500 $3,635,090 $0 $0 $0 $4,028,644
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014 15 2015 16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Park Development(120) $47,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,500
Prop 84 State Grant(235) $22,554 $283,500 $3,635,090 $0 $0 $0 $3,941,144
Rops Funding $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
Total Costs: $110,054 $283,500 $3,635,090 $0 $0 $0 $4,028,644
Impact on Operations: This project will provide a new neighborhood park and will require park maintenance such as mowing,cleaning of
bathrooms,as well as maintenance of all other amenities and landscape irrigation. It will Increase operational and
maintenance costs by about$60,000 per year.
F-7
Pi 08
PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
P109
,&Mimi �
A
Railroad Crossings
Railroad Crossings are extremely expensive and
infrequent projects, requiring large funding commitments, lengthy
construction schedules and inevitably causing some inconvenience to the local
community during the construction period. They are, however, also one of the best ways to
ensure the safety of drivers, pedestrians and rail users by providing two separate crossings, thereby minimizing the possi-
bility of train versus automobile, or train versus pedestrian accidents.
Railroad Crossings are identified in the City's General Plan document, and they are also frequently illustrated in regional
planning documents held by the County of San Bernardino, SANBAG and Caltrans.
Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
$25.000
Project List & FY 2013-14 Expenditures
1. 6th Street @ BNSF Spur- Improve $25,000
Grade Crossing
Total $25,000
■Transportation
G
Pilo
PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
P111
A Key: 1839
6th Street at BNSF Spur - Improve at Grade Crossing
Project location:
Intersection of Etiwanda and FF{{pp
Whittram Avenues. ' AMONOA FONTANA
ZARROW ROUTE
Est.Construction Start/End: WHITT AM AVE.
10/2015-06/2016 SC.v-E:NwvE
METROLINK RAILROAD
Project Status:
Design
Department: BTH ST
Engineering — PROJECT
�j LOCATION
Project Manager:
Curt Billings
Description: Prepare preliminary design drawings and cost estimates for an at grade crossing on 6th Street at the BNSF Railroad Spur.
fustiflcation: This project will complete 6th Street,between Santa Anita Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 50
Design/Plan Review $0 $25,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $25,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0
Construction $0 s0 so $350,000 $0 $0 $350,000
Inspection 8,Administration $0 $0 s0 $50,000 s0 $0 $50,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $40,000 so $0 $40,000
Total Costs: $0 $25,000 s0 $440,000 so $0 $465,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Transportation Fund(124) $0 $25,000 $0 $440,000 $0 s0 $465,000
Total Costs: so $25,000 50 $440,000 $0 $0 $465,000
Impact on Operations: None.
G-1
Pl 12
PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
P113
w
—
Streets
Streets projects are the most common type of projects undertaken
by the City. The City receives annual funding from Measure I and gasoline sales
taxes for use on resurfacing projects for local arterial and residential streets in order to extend pavement
life and improve driving conditions. Besides street rehabilitation projects, the City also undertakes many widening
and extension projects as need dictates via new development, community needs and the City's General Plan.
Project List& FY 2013-14 Expenditures Project List& FY 2013-14 Expenditures
I. 4th St,Archibald to Haven North Side- $20,000 21. Hermosa Ave from Main to $203,000
Pavement Rehab Arrow-Pavement Rehab
2. 4th St,Milliken to Richmond,North $206,000 22. Lemon Ave Archibald to Haven- $500
Side-Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
3. 6th St, Hermosa to Haven-Pavement $15,000
23. Local Streets-Pavement Rehab $ ,792,770
Rehab
4. 8th St, Baker to Hellman-Pavement 24. Madrone Ave,north of 9th St- $500
$15'000 Widening
Rehab
S. 9th Sc Railroad Spur to Hellman and $303,600 25. Rochester Ave, Foothill Blvd to $500
Baker,8th to 9th-Sidewalk Base line Rd- Pavement Rehab
6. 9th St. North Side from 100' west to $118,300 26. Victoria St, Etiwanda to E.City $50,000
800'west of Vineyard-Sidewalk Limits-Widening 8 Pavement
7. 19th St,from West City Limit to $500 27. Youngs Canyon, Koch PI,to $50,000
Haven- Pavement Rehab Cherry Ave-Street Extension
8. Archibald Ave,4th to Foothill- $50000 Total $46,221,330
Pavement Rehab
9. Archibald Ave, Hillside to North City $S00 Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
Limit- Pavement Rehab $324.400 $71760
$169500 $47.000 $50,000
10. Banyan St, Merlot to Cantabria-Side- $66,000 $2.290.670
walk north side
11. Baseline Ave at I-I S Interchange $43,000,000 $3.000
0,000
12. Beryl St, Baseline to 19th -Sidewalk $127,000
west side $3.340,000
13.Carnelian St,Lemon to Wilson- $500
Pavement Rehab
14. Etiwanda Ave @ Whitman-Widen $10,000 $4.000,00
intersection 8 Install Traffic Signal
and
15. Etiwa Ave,6th to Arrow- $50,000 31400 000
Street Widening
16. Foothill Blvd,Vineyard to Archibald- $15,000
Pavement Rehab .Tax Allocation Bonds ® SAFETEA-LU (Federal)
17. Haven Ave, Banyan to Wilson- $110,660
Sidewalk east side .Transportation . IMD(Federal)
18. Haven Ave,Wilson to N. City Limits- $1 5,000
Pavement Rehab .Gas Tax RT7360 . Citywide Infrastructure
19. Hellman Ave. Baseline to 19th- $500
Pavement Rehab E]Safe Route to Schools ■ Measure I
20. Hermosa Ave, Banyan to Wilson- $500
Pavement Rehab Proposition 42 AD 88-2
H
Pl 14
PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
P115
JL Key: 1853
4th Street from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - North Side Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
4th Street from Archibald Avenue
to Haven Avenue
W
ZZO a O Dj Q
Est.Construction Start/End:
08/2015-10/2015 W
= w
] �uL
Project Status: 4TH ST.
Design
Department: BOUDARY LINE PROJECT LOCATION
Engineering CITY OF ONTARIO
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $o $o $0 $0
Design/Plan Review 50 $20,000 $500 $0 $0 $o $20,500
Right-of-Way $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $272,000 $0 $0 $272,000
Inspection&Administration $0 So $0 $6,000 $0 $0 $6,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $27,000 $0 $0 $27,000
Total Costs: $0 520,000 $500 $305,000 $0 $0 $325,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 201415 201516 201617 201718 T TAL
Measure I Fund(176) $0 $10,000 $0 50 $0 $p $10,000
Measure I Fund(177) $0 $10,000 $500 $305,000 $0 $0 $315,500
Total Costs: $0 $20,000 $500 $305,000 $0 $0 $325,500
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-1
P116
1L Key: 1817
4th Street from Milliken Avenue to Richmond Place - North Side Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
JERSEY BLVD
4th Street From Milliken Avenue to
Richmond Place
w
>
a
a
x
Est.Construction Start/End:
6TH S7 tip
08/2013-09/2013
J
Q � �
Project Status: Z j Q
Design 5 O
k a
4TH ST m
Department. - - ---is=s�i� --
Engineering
Project Manager: PROJECT LOCATION
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
Project Cost Estimate($1�
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/16 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $170,000 So $0 $0 $0 $170,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $11,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000
Contingency $0 $17,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,000
Total Costs: $0 $206,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Gas Tax RT7360 Fund(174) $0 $206,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,000
Total Costs: $0 $206,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-2
P117
JL Key: 1849
6th Street from Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location: �_ r
6th Street from Hermosa Avenue LLi
to Haven Avenue Q Q 7TH $T
Q W w
o z a
Z
of U
Est.Construction Start/End: 2 =
08/2014-10/2014
Project Status: 6TH ST.
Design PR JECT LOC TION
v
Department: V Q
Engineering �� j
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate($1:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 201511 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1s,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $267,500 $0 $0 $0 $267,500
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 56,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,000
Contingency $0 $0 $26,500 $0 $0 $0 $26,500
Total Costs: $0 $15,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $315,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 S1s,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $315,000
Total Costs: $0 $1s,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $315,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-3
A Key: 1851 P1 18
8th Street from Baker Avenue to Hellman Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project location:
8th Street, from Baker Avenue to
Hellman Avenue
LL ARROW RTE.
n LJLJ s
o �I > J�
Est.Construction Start/End: u a a W
09/2014-10/2014 0 8TH ST.
m
Project Status: 3 l� �
Design CITY
8TH ST. YARD
Department:
Engineering
PROJECT LOCATION
Project Manager: BOUDARY LINE
Romeo David CITY OF ONTARIO
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/16 2016117 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPOES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $15,00(1 $0 $0 50 $o $15,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $267,500 $0 $0 $o $267,500
Inspection&Administration $0 $(1 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $6.000
Contingency $0 $0 $26,500 $0 $0 $0 $26,500
Total Costs: $0 $15,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $315,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 2015116 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $o $15,000 $3001000 $0 $0 $0 $315,000
Total Costs: $0 $15,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $315,000
Impact on operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-d
P119
JL Key: 1856
9th Street from Railroad Spur to Hellman Avenue and Baker Avenue from 8th Street to 9th Street
Sidewalk Improvements
Project Location:
9th Street,from spur to Hellman Lll
Avenue and Baker Avenue,from
8th Street to 9th Street. Q G L > AR [
n ARROW RTE, n c
J
Est.Construction Start/End: Y W
05/2014-06/2014 Co z =
[9TH ST.
Project Status:
Design and Construction
Department: PROJECT LOC I ION YARD
Engineering 8TH ST.
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: This project will install 1,750 feet of sidewalk to close a gap between two existing sections of sidewalk.
Justification: This project was requested by the Cucamonga School District.The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation,as well as
bringing the area into ADA compliance.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/1 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTA
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review 50 $15,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 50 $o $0 $0 50
Construction $0 $250,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $13,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,600
Contingency $0 $25,000 5o $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Total Costs: $0 $303,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $303,600
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013114 2014115 2015/1 2016117 2017/1 TOTAL
Citywide Infrastructure Fund(198( $0 $70,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $70,000
Safe Routes to School Program(234) $0 $233,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $233,600
Total Costs: $0 $303,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $303,600
Impact on Operations: This project will reduce maintenance and weed abatement costs from General Fund and LIVID 3B.
H-5
P120
JL Key: 1908
9th Street North Side from 100 feet West to 800 feet West of Vineyard Avenue - Sidewalk
Improvements
Project Location: �+
9th Street,north side,from 100 ¢
rc ¢
feet west of Vineyard Avenue to ARROW ROUTE ARROW ROUTE� -
800 feet west of Vineyard Avenue ARROW ROUTE z
¢ ? 9 TH ST 9 TH ST
I �
" saw
L.._..__.._......._..._...._.... ..
Est.Construction .......-_...
Construction Start/End: -- _ ___.,_.__................_........_..
B TH ST - -_�
12/2012-01/2013 e TH ST
PROJECT a
LOCATION
Project Status:
Design and Construction = �+
¢ 6TH ST
WKd
Department:
Engineering ¢r=j
Project Manager: N.T.S. 4 TH ST
Curt Billings —
Description: Project to construct 700 feet of sidewalk on the north side of 9th Street.
Justification: To provide students a safe and direct route walking to school.The poject goal is to reduce the need for bus services and its
benefits are measured by student surveys taken before and after the project. The City was awarded a Federal Safe Routes To
School grant to fund 7596 of the construction costs.Funding becomes available in FY 2013/2014,beginning October 1,2013
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $5,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 55,760
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $105,500 $0 $0 $0 $o $1051500
Inspection&Administration $0 $2,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,300
Contingency $0 $10,500 $0 $0 $0 $o $10,500
Total Costs: $5,760 $119,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $124,060
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Citywide Infrastructure(198) $5,760 $27,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,260
Safe Route School Fund(234) $0 $90,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,800
Total Costs: $5,760 $118,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $124,060
Impact on Operations: Reduction in parkway maintenance costs.
H-6
P121
J L Key: 1836
19th Street from West City Limit to Haven Avenue- Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
th Street, from the west city
li
IimR to Haven Avenue
LLLILLIJLU�SLoUt1��cL�
0o arsnraax xisnnto.Av
Est.Construction Start/End: flit '
08/2014-10/2014 19TH ST
Project Status:
[ C
Design
x n � (-
�n
Department:
Engineering
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate j$):
Expenditure Expenditure/Cate�JJortory Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 201511 2016/1 2017118 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $49,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $1,225,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,225,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $27,500 $0 $0 $0 $27,500
Contingency $0 $0 $122,500 $0 $0 $0 $122,500
Total Costs: $49,000 $500 $1,375,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,424,500
Project Funding:
Funding Prior years 2013/ 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Measure I Fund(177) $49,000 $500 $1,375,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,424,500
Total Costs: $49,000 $500 $1,375,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,424,500
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-7
P122
JL Key: 1852
Archibald Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project JL�.Jj tr�� las
Archibald d Avenue,from 4th Street
to Foothill Boulevard II(nII}III ILJnLJnLJI I
Amgw m1l�'E1jE
PR CTL T N 11
oily aT LLLIII
Est.Construction Start/End: _
08/2015—10/2015 u B
9
Project Status: _
s.
Design T= o
O O
6T.er
Department: x
Engineering
Project Manager:
xNm
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
addition,the project Is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate($(:
Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 201611 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so 50
Design/Plan Review $0 $50,000 $S00 $0 50 50 550,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 50 s0 $O $0
Construction $0 $0 50 $1,070,000 $0 $0 $1,070,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 50 $24,000 $o $0 $24,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $107,000 50 $0 $107,000
Total Costs: $0 $50,000 $500 $1,201,000 $0 $0 $1,251,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Measure I Fund(176) $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 550,000
Measure I Fund(177) $0 $0 $500 $1,201,000 $0 $0 $1,201,500
Total Costs: $0 $50,000 $500 $1,201,000 $0 $0 $1,251,5011
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-8
P123
JL Key: 1727
Archibald Avenue from Hillside Road to North City Limit - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location: \
Archibald Avenue,from Hillside I
Road to North City Limit
PROJECT LOCATION
CITY LIMIT
Est.Construction Start/End: --
08/2015-10/2015 t- -
N Q
Q Q
Project Status: �J — .- - w
Design < = g -
K
-- - Q HILLSIDE RD
Department:
w
Engineering
ZWILSONAVE
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015116 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $16,720 $500 $500 $0 $0 $0 $17,720
Right-of-Way So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction so $0 $0 $490,000 $0 $0 $490,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $11,000 $0 $0 $11,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $49,000 $0 $0 $49,000
Total Costs: $16,720 $500 $500 $550,000 $0 $0 $567,720
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 2015/16 2016117 2017/18 TO AL
Measure I Fund(177( $550,000 $500 $500 $550,000 $0 50 $1,101,000
Total Costs: $550,000 $500 $500 $550,000 $0 $0 $1,101,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-9
P124
A Key: 1862
Banyan Street from Merlot Court to Cantabria Avenue- Sidewalk North Side
Project Location:
North side of Banyan Street.from -
MerlotCourt toEastofCantabria HILLSIDE RD
Avenue.
WILSON AVE-
Est.Construction Start/End: 0 -
Unknown 0 -_
i BANYAN ST
Project Status:
Design
z
Department: --- -
Engineering
I PROJECT LOCATION
Project Manager: -
Curt Billings � I i.
Description: This proposed sidewalk project along the north side of Banyan Street will fill a gap where sidewalks are missing and provide
improved ADA access to Banyan Elementary School and Los Osos High School.
Justification: This project is part of the City Master Plan.The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation as well as bring the area into
ADA compliance.
Project Cost Estimate($(:
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $8,500 $0 50 $0 $0 $8,500
Contingency $0 $0 $o 50 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $66,000 $0 $0 50 50 $66,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Gas Tax RT 7360(174( $0 $66,000 $0 $0 50 $0 566,000
Total Costs: $0 $66,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,000
Impact on Operations: Reduction in parkway maintenance costs.
H-10
JL Key: 1361 P125
Base Line Road - at 1-15 Interchange
Project location: 0
Base Line Road at the 1-15 Freeway
4
9H
Est.Construction Start/End:
12/2013-12/2015
Project Status:
Design d J Is 0 CT LOC TION
Department: m
W Y
it
Engineering
Project Manager: a
Walt Stickney 66
Description: Construction of a modification to the on and off ramps for the 1-15 Freeway at ease Line Road.
Justification: Due to the current and projected congestion of the streets around the Interchange,it is necessary to improve access to and from
the 1-15 freeway at Base Une Road. Up to 50 percent of the project costs are eligible for reimbursement through Federal funds.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Categon Prior Years 2013/14 201415 201516 201617 201718 7dTAL
Environmental/NPDES $1,065,033 $0 So So $0 50 $1,065,033
Design/Plan Review $4,576,400 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $4,576,400
Right-of-Way $6,396,387 $1,000,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $7,396,387
Construction $0 $35,000,000 S200,0D0 $0 $0 $o $35,200,000
Soft Costs $0 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $7,000,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0
Total Costs: $12,037,820 $43,000,000 52110,000 $0 $0 $0 $55,237,820
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 201617 2017/18 TOTAI
Transportation(124) $898,571 $3,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $4,148,571
RDA(660) $11,116,482 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,116,482
Tax Allocation Bonds $31,400,001) $0 $0 $o $0 $31,400,000
City Infrastructure(198) $1,350,000 $200,000 $0 $0 00 $1,550,000
General Fund(001) $18,996 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $18,996
RDA(650) $3,771 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,771
Subtotal City Budget Costs: $12,037,820 $36,000,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $48,237,820
IMD(Federal) $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000
SAFETEA-LU(Federal) $0 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000
Subtotal Other Costs: $0 $7,000,000 so So $0 $o $7,000,000
Grand Total Costs: $12037.820 $43.000,000 $200.000 $0 $0 $0 $55,237,820
Impact on Operations: City is expected to take over maintenance of the landscaping within the interchange. Area of landscaping has not
yet been determined.
H-11
P126
JL Key: 1863
Beryl Street from Base Line Road to 19th - Sidewalk West Side
Project —
Beryl Street,get,Base line Road to L—J II � 9TH ST
19th Street
Li
JE N Q
JI Z
Est.Construction Start/End: C13
Unknown �0 C/) J
J
Project Status: �� w J
Design l CO
Department: 7�
Engineering '�
BJ4SE LINE RD
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: This project will install a sidewalk to close a gap between existing sections of sidewalks on the west side of Beryl Street.
Justification: This project is part of the City Master Plan.The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation as well as bring the area Into
ADA compliance.
Project Cost Estimate($1:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 201711 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 $0 $0 $0 so
Design/Plan Review $0 515,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Right-of-Way 50 so $o $o $o $0 So
Construction so $85,000 $0 $o $o $0 $85,000
Inspection&Administration 50 $18,500 $o $o $o So $18,500
Contingency $0 $8,500 $0 $0 50 $0 58,500
Total Costs: so $127,0()0 So $o $o $0 $127,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Gas Tax RT7360(174) $0 5127,000 $0 50 $0 $0 5127,00()
Total Costs: $o $127,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $127,000
Impact on Operations: Reduction in parkway maintenance costs.
H-12
P127
A Key: 1722
Carnelian Street from Lemon Avenue to Wilson Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
Carnelian Street,Lemon Avenue to
Wilson AvenueLUI u
N.T.B.
n
PR JECT LOCH
Est.Construction Start/End: IIUI
08/2015-10/2015
ALTA LOMA
Project Status: _ 1A IItl III JR. HIGH _
Design UU'LJ'lJ
Department:
Engineering
ST BERYL I EAST BERYL
PARK PARK
Project Manager: t
Romeo David — D
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible fora CalRecycle 3 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/14 2014 15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 50 50 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $500 $0 $0 $0 $11,000
Right-of-Way $o $0 $0 $o $0 50 50
Construction 50 $0 $0 $445,500 $o So $445,500
Inspection&Administration So 50 $o $10,000 $0 $0 $10,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $44,500 $0 $o $44,500
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $500,000 $0 $0 $511,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Measure I Fund(177) $10,000 $500 $500 5500,000 $0 $0 $511,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $500,000 $0 so $511,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend other needed areas.
H-13
!L Key 1840 P128
Etiwanda Avenue at Whittram Avenue -Widen Intersection and Install a Traffic Signal
Project location: L;
Intersection of Etlwanda and L li FONTANA
Whittram Avenue. ApuLT i
P129
IL Key: 1076
Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route - Street Widening
Project Location:
Etiwanda Avenue from 61h Street �jl CI RANCHO A FONTANA
to Arrow Route
ARROW ROUTE
Est.Construction Sta End: Gzj _
rt/ WHITT M AVE- SCALE:NONE
10/2015-06/2016 RAILROAD
Project Status:
Design
6TH ST
Department:
Engineering
PROJECT
Project Manager: LOCATION
Curt Billings
Description: Prepare preliminary design drawings for the widening of Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route.This project will also
install a storm drain along Etiwanda Avenue.
Justification: This project will improve safety,drainage and traffic circulation on Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route.The project
will be constructed concurrently with intersecton and signal installation at Whittram Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Catecory Prior Years 2013/ 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017118 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $63,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $113,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $1,850,000 $0 $0 $1,850,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000
Contingency $0 So So $200,000 So $0 $200,000
Total Costs: $63,000 $50,000 $50,000 $2,100,000 $0 $0 $2,263,000
Project Funding:
Funding Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/1 2017/18 TOTAL
Transportation Fund(124) $63,000 $25,000 $50,000 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $1,238,000
Infrastructure Fund(198) $0 $25,000 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,025,000
Total Costs: $63,000 $50,000 $50,000 $2,100,000 $0 $0 $2,263,000
Impact on Operations: Reduction in street maintenance and repair costs.
H-15
JL Key: 1855 P130
Foothill Boulevard from Vineyard to Archibald - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
Foothill Boulevard,from Vineyard
Avenue to Archibald Avenue
/ II! > FO HILL< BLVD a
Est.Construction Start/End. — 66
08/2015-10/2015 Z
Project Status:
Design Survey
Department: PR C-- ,
.�j� II
Engineering
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate($j:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/2 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 so $0 $o so $0
Design/Plan Review 50 $15,000 $500 So So $o $15,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 So
Construction $0 50 $0 $715,000 $0 50 $715,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $16,000 So $o $16,000
Contingency $0 So $o $71,000 $0 $0 $71,000
Total Costs: $0 $15,000 $500 5802,000 $0 $0 $817,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Measure I Fund(176) $0 S15,000 $0 $0 5o $0 $15,000
Measure I Fund(177) So $0 $500 $802,000 $0 5o $802,500
Total Costs: SO $15,000 $500 $802,000 $0 $0 $817,500
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-16
P131
A Key: 1864
Haven Avenue from Banyan to Wilson - Sidewalk East Side
Project Location: i
East Side of Haven Avenue.from
Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue HILLSIDE RD
WWWILSONAVE
IQ 1
Est.Construction Start/End: —
Unknown � i
i BANYAN ST _
Project Status: -
Design --
Department:
Engineering
F�6JECT LOCATION
Protect Manager. / /
Curt Billings
Description: The proposed sidewalk project along east side of Haven Avenue will fill a gap where sidewalks are missing and provide improved
ADA accessible access to Chaffey College.
Justification: This project is part of the City Master Plan.The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation as well as bring the area into
ADA compliance.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/16 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $0 $13,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $84,920 $0 $0 $0 $0 $84,920
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0
Contingency $o $12,740 $0 $o $0 $0 $12,740
Total Costs: $0 $110,660 $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,660
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 2017118 TOTAL
Gas Tax RT7360(174) $0 $1101660 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $110,660
Total Costs: $0 $110,660 $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,660
Impact on Operations: Reduction in parkway maintenance costs.
H-17
P132
11 Key: 1854
Haven Avenue from Wilson to North City Limit - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
Haven Avenue,from Wilson /
Avenue to North City Limit
HIDDE F M
IPROJ CAT[ N
G'JVY�a
Est.Construction Start/End:
08/2015—10/2015 STA RO S
z L_
Project Status:
�C
Design
a HILLSIDE_ RD.
Department:
Engineering a
Project Manager: - _ L WILSON ST.
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $15,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 $15,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $668,500 $0 $0 $668,500
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $15,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $66,500 50 $0 $66,500
Total Costs: $0 $15,000 $500 $750,000 $0 $0 $765,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/1S 201S/16 2016117 2017/1 TOTAL
Measure I Fund(176) $0 $15,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 $15,500
Measure I Fund(177) $0 $0 $0 $750,000 $0 $0 $750,000
Total Costs: $0 $15,000 $500 $750,000 $0 $0 $765,500
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-18
P133
1L Key: 1816
Hellman Avenue from Base Line Road to 19th Street - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project location:
Hellman Avenue,from Base Line 19TH I URT ¢ `
-�L L
Road to 19th Street }}
U3
F
m [
Est.Construction Start/End: � E VISTA S
08/2014-10/2014
IIII���Ii(('���
Project Status: Lf
Design W
Department:
Engineering
Project Manager: n JAR FI F
Romeo David 1111 III��I / _ I
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/1 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $0 $o $o $0 $o
Design/Plan Review $25,000 $500 $0 so $o $0 $25,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $365,500 So $o $0 $365,500
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $8,000 50 $0 $0 $8,000
Contingency $0 $0 $36,500 $0 $0 $0 $36,500
Total Costs: $25,000 $500 $410,000 $0 $0 $0 $435,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 2013/1 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 201711 TOTAL
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174( $25,000 $500 $410,000 $0 $0 $0 $435,500
Total Costs: $25,000 $500 $410,000 $0 $0 $0 $435,500
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-19
ILKFy. 1815 P1 34
Hermosa Avenue from Banyan to Wilson - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project location:
Hermosa Avenue,from Banyan
Street to Wilson Avenue
HILLSIDE RD
NILSON AVE°-
'<j PR JECT LOCATI
Est.Construction ctlon Start/End: qy '�
09/2016-10/2016 nl I _a0 �'
Project status: s scnur.-noxe _
BANYAN S11 —
Design
Department: - - — - _-
Engineering
i
t j
Project Manager: - - I ,
Curt Billings
Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt pavement overlay and
striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 2017/18 TOM
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $500 $0 $o $0 $11,000
Right-of-Way So $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o
Construction $0 50 $o $230,000 $o $0 $230,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $o $10,000 $0 $0 $10,000
Contingency $o $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $260,000 $0 $0 $271,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 201611 2017/1 TOTAL
Gas Tax RT7360(174) $10,000 $500 $500 $0 $0 $0 $11,000
Unfunded So $o 50 $260,000 $0 $0 $260,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $260,000 $o $0 $11,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-20
P135
J Key: 1850
Hermosa Avenue from Main Street to Arrow Route - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project locatlom
Hermosa Avenue, from Main
Street to Arrow Route -
ARITE ui
LJ
Est.Construction Start/End: OJECT L ATIO 04/2014—06/2014 Project Status:Design
Department:
Engineering _
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2023/1 2014/15 2015 16 2016/1 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 W $10,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
Contingency $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000
Total Costs: $0 $203,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $103,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 2016117 201718 TOTAL
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $203,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $203,000
Total Costs: $0 $203,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $203,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-21
P136
JL Key: 1793
Lemon Avenue from Archibald to Haven - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
Lemon Avenue, from Archibald
Avenue to Haven Avenue
PROJECT LOCATION .
n
LEMON ST
Est Construction Start/End:
FY 2017/18
Project Status: _
Design 19TH ST
�W_.
Department: -
Engineering 4� w m
Ir
_J m W
- - - - - -
Project Manager: a_ — - - -
Curt Billings _ oerncir ca crr n-roml - -
Description: This project involves,cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt pavement overlay and
striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Cateeory Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $500 $500 $500 $0 $12,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $500 $500 $560,000 $572,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Prop 42 Fund(190) $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,OOD
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $500 $500 $500 $500 $0 $2,000
Unfunded $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $560,000 $560,DOo
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $500 $500 $560,000 $572,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-22
P137
It Key: 1022
Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at Various Locations
Project Location:
Various Locations
µST 1 J
Est.Construction Start/End: sTry c y
04/2014—06/2014 `.
Project Status: 8
Design and Construction
MRa Ra TR
Department:
Engineering _
emsT PROJECT LOCATIONS
VARIOUS
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: This project involves either a slurry seal or asphalt overlay.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2012/13 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $1,500,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $92,770 $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,770
Contingency $0 $150,000 $0 $o So $0 $150,000
Total Costs: $0 $1,792,770 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,792,770
Project Funding:
Funding Prior Years 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 TOTAL
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $1,721,380 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,721,380
Prop 42 Fund(190) $0 $71,390 $0 $0 $0 $0 $71,390
Total Costs: $0 $1,792,770 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,792,770
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-23
P138
JL Key: 1818
Madrone Avenue North of 9th Street - Widening with Southwest Cucamonga Park
Project Location:
Madrone Avenue, north of 9th 66 -
Street
w
z
a
w
z
¢ nn
a AR ow RTE- PROl LT LOCATION
w
> w
Est.Construction Start/End: °
r7 m
06/2014-07/2014 H ST
Project Status: I-
BTH ST
Design and Construction -\ ----.�
w
IZ
Department•.
Engineering
SCALE NONE X I - _. _ °=a
Project Manager:
Curt Billings
Description: This project adds 320 linear feet of street widening and 3 street lights along the frontage of the new Southwest Cucamonga Park
that will be constructed concurrently.
Justification: This project will provide ADA accessibility and inprove pedestrian and vehicle safety along the steet frontage of the new Southwest
Cucamonga Park.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2Q13/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $114,200 $0 $0 $0 $114,200
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $0 $13,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $127,200 $0 $0 $0 $137,700
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Gas Tax RT7360(174) $10,000 $500 $127,200 $0 $0 $0 $137,700
Total Costs: $101008 $500 $127,200 $0 $0 $0 $137,700
Impact on Operations: This project adds 3 street lights into Street Light Maintenace districts SLD 2 and SLID 6.
H-24
A Key. 1821 P139
Rochester Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
Rochester Avenue from Foothill BASE LINE RD
Boulevard to Base Line Road - -
CHURCH ST
Est Construction Start/End: ,�},
09/2016-10/2016 =- PROJEtT
LOCATION
Project Status: ° j p
M
Design = J FOOTHILL BLVD
U
Department:
Engineering
Project Manager: �. _ ARROW ROUTE
Curt Billings
Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt pavement overlay and
striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $500 $500 So $D $11,500
Right-of-Way 50 So 50 50 $o $0 $D
Construction $0 $0 so $o $520,000 $0 $520,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
Contingency $0 $0 so so $60,000 So $60,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $500 $5901000 $0 $6011so0
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013114 2014 15 201511 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Measure I Fund(177) $10,000 $500 $500 $4,000 $590,000 $0 $605,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $4,000 $590,000 $0 $605,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-25
J Key: 1838 P140
Victoria Street from Etiwanda Avenue to East City Limit -Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
Victoria Street, from ELlwanda BANYAN ST
Avenue to East City Limit a �i
<` /
- _ r
Est.Construction Start/End: 1 /
04/2015-06/2015
Project Status: oe FONTANA
Design VICTORLA ST. -
Department: g
Engineering
Project Manager: -BASE LINE IRD P JECT LOCATION
Curt Billings j
Description: This project involves curb and gutter,asphalt pavement,cold planing,and ac overlay and striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
The project may widen areas lacking sidewalks for improved pedestrian access.
Project Cost Estimate I$):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $50,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Contingency $0 $0 $30,000 $0 50 $0 $30,000
Total Costs: $0 $50,000 $360,000 $0 $0 $0 $410,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Transportation Fund(124) $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Measure I Fund(176) $o $15,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $15,000
Measure I Fund(177) 5o $10,000 $0 $0 $0 5o $10,000
Unfunded So $0 $360,000 $0 $0 So $360,000
Total Costs: $0 $50,000 $360,000 50 50 $o $410,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-26
P141
JL Key: 1601
Youngs Canyon Road from Koch Place to Cherry Avenue - Street Extension
Project Location:
Youngs Canyon Road,Koch Place
to Cherry Avenue i
a
PROJE TION
U
AVE
Est.Construction Start/End:
04/2015-10/2015
CREEK PARK VOUNGS CANNON
Project Status: BANYAN ST
Design /
Department: ¢ /
rn /
Engineering w /
Project Manager:
Curt Billings
Description: The extension of Youngs Canyon Road between Koch Place and Cherry Avenue will construct a 4lane road across a flood control
basin and connect to Cherry Avenue.
Justification: This extension of Youngs Canyon Road will provide a secondary access to development west of Cherry Avenue and an easterly
extension of Banyan Street which connects to Youngs Canyon Road to the west.It will also relieve traffic congestion on Wilson
Avenue to the north.
Project Cost Estimate($j:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $o $0 $100,000
Design/Plan Review $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 S0 $0 $150,000
Right-of-Way $0 $o $0 $525,000 $0 $0 $525,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $600,000 So $0 $600,000
Inspection&Administration SO $0 $0 $25,000 $o $0 $25,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Total Costs: $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/1 TOTAL
AD 88-2 Etiw/Highlnd Impry(813) $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Total Costs: $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $1,350,000 $0 So $1,500,000
Impact on Operations: Adds 1,000 feet of roadway to the City's street maintenance program. A more detailed cost estimate will be
available after the design phase is complete.
H-27
PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
. - P143
.i
Traffic�
Projects included in this section are typically
those that will promote safe and efficient traffic circulation per State
and local design standards. Many of these projects include new signals, upgrades to
intersections - such as additional turn pockets or signal timing upgrades - as well as synchroni-
zation and coordination projects that promote traffic flows along the City's heaviest traveled arterial streets.
Traffic Projects are typically funded via Transportation Development Funds. However, Measure I, Gas Tax Funds, Street
Lighting Districts and some grant funding are also possible funding sources.
Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
Project List & FY 2013-14 Expenditures $32S,000
I. Day Creek Blvd. @ Silverberry - $25,000
Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn
Phases
2. Day Creek Blvd. @ Victoria Park $25,000
Lane- Upgrade Traffic Signal Left
Turn Phases
3. Haven Ave. @ Valencia - Left Turn $75,000
Pocket Extension
4. Traffic Management Center- $200,000
Upgrade Project Citywide
Total $325,000
■Transportation
I
PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
P145
1L Key: 1845
Day Creek Boulevard at Silverberry Street - Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn Phases
Project Location: w
> J
Day Creek Boulevard at Silverberry Q m i.B/NYAN_ST
Street y
LU
J
U Q
Est.Construction Start/End:
01/2014–04/2014 HIGHLAND AVE
Project Status: BERRZ�/S T PROJECT LOCATION
Design
Department: VICTORIA PARK LN
Engineering _
Project Manager. _ _ — PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL _ _ _ Nor ro SCALE
Jason Welday
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,removing protected-permissive left turn phasing
and replacing with protected left turn phasing on Day Creek Boulevard for the traffic signal at this location.
Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by providing an exclusive phase for left turn vehicle movements. In
addition, pedestrian crossings will occur separate from left turn movements, which previously occurred simultaneously with
protected-permissive traffic signal equipment.
Project Cost Estimate($j:
Expenditure/Cateaon Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 201511 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 5o $0 s0 $0 so
Design/Plan Review $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $1,000
Right-of-Way $o $0 5o $o $0 5o so
Construction $0 $20,000 50 $o $0 $0 $20,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $2,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $2,000
Contingency $0 $1,000 $0 $0 So $o 52,000
Total Costs: 5o $25,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 201511 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Transportation(124) 50 $25,000 $0 5o 5o $o $25,000
Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 5o $25,000
Impact on Operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left turn traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on
operations will be present.
I-1
JL Key 1846 P146
Day Creek Boulevard at Victoria Park Lane - Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn Phases
Project Location: w >
J
Day Creek ek Boulevard at Victoria Q o7 AN$T
Park Lane
Q QU
U > O
Z
Est.Construction Start/End: w
01/2014-04/2014 - HIGHLANDAVE
Project status: S2�EReE!?RV - _ —
ST
Design
.(
/�' PROJECT LOCATION
Department: VICTORIA PARK LN(D.Ae-
Engineering �(J
Project Manager: _ PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL __ NOT TO SCALE
Jason Welday
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to,removing protected-permissive left turn phasing
and replacing with protected left turn phasing on Day Creek Boulevard for the traffic signal at this location.
Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by providing an exclusive phase for left turn vehicle movements.In
addition, pedestrian crossings will occur separate from left turn movements, which previously occurred simultaneously with
protected-permissive traffic signal equipment.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 5o so $o $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 50 51,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 50 5o 5o
Construction $0 $20,000 $0 So So So S20,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $2,000 $0 So $0 50 $2,000
Contingency So 52,000 5o 5o 5o $o $2,000
Total Costs: 5o $25,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $25,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Transportation(124) so $25,000 $0 50 so 5o $25,000
Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $o So $0 $0 $25,000
Impact on Operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left turn traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on
operations will be present.
1-2
P147
1L Key: 1841
Haven Avenue at Valencia Avenue - Left Turn Pocket Extension
Project Location:
Haven Avenue southbound left --
turn pocket at Valencia Avenue
<
Est.Construction Start/End: < < z
09/2013—10/2013 p p w Y
Q 2 >
T w
Project Status: PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PROJECT LOCATION
Design - - _-
_ VALENCIA AVE. -
Department: C EPNATRRKA L
Engineering BASE LINE RD
NOT TO SCALE -
Project Manager:
Jason Welday
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, extending the left turn pocket to increase the
queuing capacity.
Justification: The project will improve safety by providing additional space for left turn stacking and decreasing the amount of vehicles queuing
in the southbound through lane.
Project Cost Estimate($j:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Design/Plan Review $0 $1,50) $0 $0 So $0 51,500
Right-of-Way 50 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $2,000 so so $o $0 $2,000
Contingency $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,500
Total Costs: $0 $75,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $75,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 201511 2016/17 201711 TOTAL
Transportation(124) $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $o 575.000
Total Costs: $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
Impact on Operations: The median landscaping will decrease with the additional space constructed for the left turn pocket,which reduces
irrigation and maintenance costs for the median.
1-3
P148
JL Key: 1831
Traffic Management Center- Upgrade Project Citywide
Project Location:
Citywide CHURCH ST ,J
W
Q Q G
Z N Q
O O
x w
FOOTHILL BLVD FOOTHILL BLVD
Est.Construction Start/End: PROJECT 656
12/2013—06/2013
LOCATION
Project Status: CIVIC CENTER DR
Design Q
ARROW ROUTE
/T� 1
Department: Y
f w
Engineering ` _ - -
� JERSEY BLVD �
em
Project Manager: - P4.T.S.
Craig Cruz
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not limited to, upgrading system software,educating staff with
operations and maintenance of the traffic management center, troubleshooting and upgrading traffic signals that are not
communicating with the traffic management center.
Justification: The project will upgrade communications to enable better monitoring,re-timing and coordination of the City's traffic signals for
improved traffic Flow and safety.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 201711 TOTAL
Consultant Services $o $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 SQ,000
Staff Training $595 $12,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $12,595
Design/Equipment Specifications $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 SO $16,000
Procurement/Construction $99,405 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $209,405
System Testing and Integration $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000
Contingency $0 $61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000
Total Costs: $100,000 $200,000 So $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Transportation(124( $100,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Total Costs: $100,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Impact on Operations: The traffic management center over time will improve maintenance staff efficiencies and reduce related costs.
These system upgrades will also provide substantial improvements in system-wide signal timing and coordination,
improving operational efficiencies,while also resulting in fewer citizen complaints.
14
F u t u r e an
& Unfunded }
Projects included in this section are those that have been identified
as being a priority project, but lack dedicated funding for the upcoming fiscal year
Projects designated as 'Unfunded' could be waiting on grant approval, or until new special fund monies become available.
Projects showing dedicated funding sources, but which are slated to occur in future fiscal years have mostly likely been
delayed due to issues with the future funding of operating expenses. In many cases, funds can be found for the capital
construction of a project like a new library or community center, but City management has not yet devised a way to fund
the necessary staff or overhead expenses required to run a new facility.
This section illustrates those priority projects that did not make it into the FY 2013/14 budget for either of these
reasons. Staff is actively pursuing grant or other fundraising opportunities for several of the projects in this section.
Project List& FY 2013-14 Expenditures Project List& FY 2013-14 Expenditures
I. Archibald Ave,Church to Palo Alto- $1,215,000 20.Milliken Ave at Vintage-Upgrade $25,000
Storm Drain Traffic Signal Left Turn Phases
2. Arrow Rte at Railroad Spur- New $75,000 21.Pacific Electric Trail Enhance- $110,000
Concrete Panels menu-West to East City Limits
3. Civic Center and Public Safety Bldg- $10,000 22.Red Hill Park- Pedestrian Paseo $100,000
Retrofit of Exterior Glass Doors 23.Upper Cucamonga Storm
Earthquake Strapping $3,900,000
4. Civic Center-Earth
Q PP g $50,000 Drain Phase 3
5. Etiwanda Ave-Grade Separation at $35,000,000 24.Various Intersections-Safety Light $150,000
Metrolink Tracks Upgrades
6. Etiwanda Creek Park-Phase II $5.580,000 25.Windrows Park-Fire Lane Repair $30,000
7. Fire District- Banyan Station $2.500,000 Total $80,364,100
B. Fire District-Central Station 178 $8,000,000 Sources of Funding for FY 201 3-1 4
9. Fire District-Operation/Dispatch $11,000,000 $225,000 $75,000$20,000
Building $245.00D $m.o0o $29,W
$5.580.00 $400.000
10.Fire District-San Bernardino $6.500,000
Station 172
11. Foothill Blvd across SCE Corridor w/o $145,000 .
Day Creek Channel-Sidewalk
12.Foothill Blvd.Grove to San Bernardino $4,630,000
- Widening and Median
$za.aoo.00D ..
13.Hellman Ave at Metrolink Tracks- $790,000
Widen Crossing - _ 45.565.000
14. Hermosa Park-Light Pole Replace- $25,000
25 000
ment
15.Lions Park East Community Center- $60,000
Flooring Replacement
16. LMD I Trail-Concrete Drainage $19,100 .Unknown Fire Capital Project
Improvement
17.LMD 411-Water Conservation and ■ Park Development LMD 4R
Landscape Renovations $400,000
.Citywide Infrastructure ■ Transportation
18. Milliken Ave at Mountain View Dr- $25,000
Upgrade Traffic Signal Lek Turn PD 85 Redemption . Gas Tax RT7360
Phases
19. Milliken Ave at Terra Vista Pkwy- $25,000 J FI Capital Reserves Beautification
Upgrade Traffic Signal Lek Turn
Phases . LMD I
PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
P151
JL Key: 1805
Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Palo Alto Street - Storm Drain
Project Location: PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL
Archibald Avenue,Foothill .y.
Boulevard to Baseline Road BASE LINE RD
BASE LINE RD
ON
AR -
PALO ALTO
HILL PRO ECT LOCATION
MU ITY
PAR �I
Est.Construction Start/End:
CHURCH ST
To be determined IILJJJ
4
Project Status: l z
Design and Construction w = w
_ _
FOOTHILL BLVD
Department-
Engineering
68
Engineering
z
7
W
Project Manager: I--I
Romeo David C°,I
Description: Construct a Master Plan Storm Drain,install catch basins,manholes,and laterals.
Justification: This project will Improve drainage within the area.
Project Cost Estimate I$):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 TBD TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $35,000 $35,000
Right-of-Way so s0 s0 $0 $0 s0 s0
Construction $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $110001000 $3,000,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $80,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $100,000 $100,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $1,215,000 $1,215,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 201611 TBD TOTAL
Unknown Fund Name(xxx) $0 so $0 $0 so $1,215,000 $1,215,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,215,000 $1,115,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance, potholes and sand bags for storm water protection and storm water cleanup, thus
freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas.
J-1
P152
JL Key: 1819
Arrow Route at Railroad Spur- New Concrete Panels
Project Location:
Arrow Route at Railroad Spur west
of Milliken Avenue
FOOTHILL BLVD
66�
a PROJECT LOCATION w
Est.Construction Start/End: u� Q ' U
05/2014-07/2014 z CO`M°PLE c
ARROW ROUTE
Project status:
Design and Construction z
JERSEY BLVD
Department:
Engineering RAIL ROAD
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: Replace existing uneven rubber panels to concrete panels.
Justification: The existing rubber panels are uneven and damaged due to heavy traffic used,replacing two concrete panels will give smoother
ride and safety for the vehicles.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Exuenditure/Category Prior years 2013/1 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so
Construction 50 $o $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Inspection&Administration $0 so $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Contingency $0 so $5,000 so $o $0 $5,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 575,000 $o $0 $0 $75,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 2013/1 2014115 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Gas Tax RT7360 Fund(174) $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $75,OOD $0 $0 $0 $75,000
Impact on Operations: Uneven rubber panels create damage along the edges of the existing asphalt pavement.This project will reduce
maintenance for asphalt replacement.
J-2
P153
It.Key
Civic Center and Public Safety Building - Retrofit of Exterior Glass Doors
Project Location:
Civic Center and Public Safety
Buildings
LL
10500 Civic Center Drive
O O
Est.Construction Start/End: PROJ CT LOC ION
08/2013-05/2014 8 8 a
O I�
w
Project Status: a _
Requested FY 2013-2014 ❑ �
Department:
Public Works Services -J
Project Manager:
Ty Quaintance
Description: Replace existing glass doors at main entrance of the Civic Center and the Public Safety Buildings.
Justification: The existing glass doors do not meet current ADA access standards.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/1 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 2017118 T AL
Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 50 $0 $0 so So
Design/Plan Review $10,000 $0 $10,000 so $0 $0 $20,000
Right-of-Way So So 5o $o $0 5o 5o
Construction So So $0 $0 So $0 $o
Inspection 8,Administration 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $10,000 so $10,000 $0 $0 $0 520,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Capital Reserve(025) $10,000 50 $10,000 $o $0 W $20,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 s0 520,000
Impact on Operations: Temponry inconvenience when new doors are installed.
J-3
P154
A Key:
Civic Center - Earthquake Strapping
Project Location:
Civic Center
10500 Civic Center Drive
Est.construction Start/End: PROJ CT LOC ION y
88 r a
August/2013-May/2014 L
w
N
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014 ❑ f
Department:
Public Works Services
Project Manager:
Ty Quaintance
Description: Install earthquake strapping to City equipment(including file cabinets)throughout the Civic Center.
Justification: Shaking caused by a strong earthquake may tip over or move office equipment thereby increasing chances of injury or damage.
Installation of earthquake strapping will secure equipment in place.
Project Cost Estimate($1:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 TRD TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $o $o $0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $50,000 $50,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 TBD TOTAL
Capital Reserve(025) $0 $0 so $0 $0 550,000 $50,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
Impact on Operations: Temporary inconvenience to Civic Center personnel while earthquake strapping being installed to their equipment.
J-4
P155
A Key: 1076
Etiwanda Avenue- Grade Separation at Metrolink Tracks
Project Location:
Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street CUC RANCHO FONTANA
to Arrow Route
ARROW ROUTE _
Est.Construction Start/End: W_ HITTRAM AVE. sewce:hove
To be determined RAILROAD
Project Status:
Design
Department: 6TH ST
Engineering
PROJECT
Project Manager: LOCATION
Curt Billings
Description: Prepare preliminary design drawings for a future grade separation on Etiwanda Avenue at the Metrolink Railroad Crossing south
of Whitram Avenue.
Justification: This project will improve safety and traffic circulation on Etiwanda Avenue.
Project Cost Estimate($I:
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior years 2013114 2014115 2015/1 2016117 TED TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $337,000 $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $587,000
Right-of-Way $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 so $0 $32,000,000 $32,W0,000
Inspection&Administration $o $0 $0 00 $o $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 50 $0 53,000,000 $3,000,000
Total Costs: $337,000 $1001000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $35,000,000 $35,587,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 TED TOTAL
Transportation Fund(124) $337,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $337,000
Unfunded $0 $100,000 $50,000 $50.000 $50,000 $35,000,000 535,250,000
Total Costs: $337,000 $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $35,000,000 $35,587,000
Impact on Operations: Added maintenance costs for a new bridge will be determined during design phase.
J-5
P156
1 L Key: 1664
Etiwanda Creek Park - Phase II
Project location:
Etiwanda Creek Park 5939 D
East Avenue
N
_ WILSON AV E.. -
Est.Construction Start/End: ✓� PROJECT L "ON
unknown
emvwns enwAaw ��
t]HENfuty CREFI(PMI(
Project status: >
RNOM /
Design
Department: I
Community Services/Parks IL '
a
Project Manager:
Karen McGuire-Emery
Description: This project involves the construction of additional athletic fields which include multi-use recreation fields,tennis courts,a"wet"
play area,a 10,000-15,000 sq.ft.community building,storage/maintenance facility and additional parking.
Justification: The City Council identified this project as a goal for FY2007-08.
Project Cost Estimate IS):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $159,230 So $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $459,230
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 so $0 $5,280,000 $0 $5,280,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 5o $0 $o $0 $0
Total Costs: $159,230 so $300,000 $0 $5,280,000 $0 $5,739.230
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201617 TOTAL
Park Development 1120) S1S9,230 So $300,000 $0 $5,280,000 $0 $5,739,230
Total Costs: $159,230 $0 $300,000 $0 $5,280,00D $0 $5,739,230
Impact on Operations: Completion of this project will add a new facility to the City's inventory which will require operational extenditures
for maintenance,staffing,overhead and utilities. Initial estimates place the cost of maintaining two addional fields
at$300,000-$400,000.
J-6
P157
1L Key: 1779
Fire District - Banyan Station 175 Expansion
Project Location:
Banyan Station(175)
11108 Banyan Street
N 3-
�- F ROJECT
L CATION
CHAFFEY
Est. /17- 017/1Start/End: COLLEGE
2016/17 �'rul _' ZLY O DR
LOS SOS
HIGH SCHOO
Project Status: T BANYAN
Design pending-project on hold
Department: ,_
Fire Protection District
Olt"p o o
Project Manager:
Mike Bell/Pamela Pane
Description: Expansion of the existing facility to accommodate additional services operating out of that facility, primarily apparatus storage.
Utilized for the Technical Rescue and Wildiand Fire Response programs.
Justification: The Banyan Station houses specialized service resources that are currently parked outside and subject to wear and tear from the
elements.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
Right-of-Way So So $0 50 50 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000
Inspection&Administration SO So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 50 SO $0 SO 50
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $2,000,000 $0 $2,500,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 201511 2016/17 201711 TOTAL
Fire Capital Projects(288) $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $2.000,000 $0 $2,500,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 50 5500,000 $2,000,000 $0 $2,500,000
Impact on Opentions: No additional personnel costs. Slightly increased operations and maintenance costs for utilities due to increased
square footage.
J-7
P158
JL Key: 1645
Fire District - Central Station 178 (New Fire Station)
Project Location: �
Within the he boundary of south of CENTRAL �.. O
Base Line Road,north of Foothill PARK ® �
Boulevard,east of Haven Avenue �T
and west of Milliken Avenue �� 0 C
Est.Construction Start/End: Z I.
Unknown J ... LJIJ❑❑iIC
Protect Status: PROJECT
Design/Choose New Location / LOCATIO
Department:
Fire Protection District
THILL LVD. 11
Project Manager:
Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane k7r,1 , r_' __
Description: New Fire Station construction. New property for this station is being identified.
Justification: New Fire Station was recommended in the Fire District's 2005 Strategic Plan. This station will serve the center of the Rancho
Cucamonga community,providing the area with emergency services for fire suppression and life safety.
Project Cost Estimate IS):
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 T8D TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Right-of-Way s0 $0 $0 $0 so so $0
Construction $0 $0 s0 s0 s0 $8,000,000 $8.000,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 so s0 $0 s0 $0
Contingency so so $0 $0 so s0 $0
Total Costs: $0 s0 $0 s0 s0 $8,000,000 $8,000,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 TBD TOTAL
Fire Capital Projects(288) s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000 $8,000,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000 $8,000,000
Impact on Operations: Annual station operations and maintenance costs will depend on the station size and staffing costs at the time of
construction. Designs with greater active/passive energy conservation and greater xeriscape will cost less to
operate. Capital equipment purchase of an engine.
J-8
P159
1L Key:
Fire District - Operations/Dispatch Building
Project Location:
Northwest corner of Civic Center
Drive and Utica Avenue
P ECT TION
Est.Construction Start/End: 88
Unknown
Project Status:
Re-design pending
Department: (-'� ❑ f
Fire Protection District
J Q
Project Manager. ®n
Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane
Description: This project will construct a building to house Fire District Headquarters personnel and a possible dispatch center.
Justification: Fire District Administration personnel have outgrown the current area in the Civic Center building. A new facility was recommended in the
2005 Strategic Plan to consolidate Fire Administration functions. There may be a future need to add a dispatch center.
Project Cost Estimate s):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014 15 2015/1 2016/17 TED TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $10,000,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 $11,000,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 TBD TOTAL
Fire Capital Projects(288) $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $11,000,000 $11,000,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 $11,000,000
Impact on Operations: Fire District operations and maintenance costs will increase with increased square footage,but will be unknown
until final design is complete.
J-9
P160
JL Key: 1733
Fire District - San Bernardino Station 172 Demolition and Relocation
Project Location:
San Bernardino Station(172)
9612 San Bernardino Road -; w < III—ICI
CHURCH ST Q -
a
m Q JD
M r
U zEFFEN ST- EPF
Lu
Est.Construction Star[/End: a 0 ' 00R
Unknown
SAN BERNARDINO RD. ° STAFFOProjeastatus: FOOTHILL LVD.On Hold urvawaPROJECT LOCAT
Department
Fire Protection District W
xoxocn ar =
r..n,IT
Project Manager: ARROW ROUTE
Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane
Description: Construction to relocate and rebuild the fire station. Alternate locations are being explored,if none are found,station will be rebuilt at
San Bernardino Road location. Project placed on hold pending the completion of other higher priority capital projects.
Justif"flon: The Fire District's 2005 Strategic Plan recommended the 55-year old fire station be rebuilt. This station serves the southwestern portion
of the Rancho Cucamonga community,providing the area with emergency services for fire suppression and life safety.
Project cost Estimate(SIB
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 TBD TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 s0 $0 50 so $0
Design/Plan Review s0 50 5o 50 $0 $500,000 5500,000
Right-of-Way $0 50 $0 50 s0 s0 $0
Construction $0 SO $0 50 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000
Inspection&Administration s0 So $0 So $0 $0 $0
Contingency s0 SO $0 So $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 50 s0 $0 $0 $6,500,000 $6,500,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/ 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 TBD TOTAL
Fire Capital Projects(288) $0 s0 $0 s0 s0 $6,500,000 $6,500,000
Total Costs: $0 s0 $0 so $0 $6,500,000 $6,500,000
Impact on Operations: No additional personnel costs are anticipated. The current San Bernardino Station personnel will move to the new
station when complete. Larger station design could create an increase in maintenance costs,but greater efficiency
in station equipment could make it a wash.
J-10
P161
1L Key: 1826
Foothill Boulevard across SCE Corridor West of Day Creek Channel -Sidewalk
Project Location:
Foothill Boulevard,SCE Corridor
West of Day Creek Channel - - — - w CHURCHST
w >
NQ
U 3Q
Est.Construction Start/End: X
S S 5
1/2014-2/2014 _ w
Project Status: '
ADULT
Design and Construction SIP
COM
� PROJECT LOCATION
a
Department:
Engineering
Project Manager: `-
Romeo David
Description: This project will install 600 feet of sidewalk to close a gap between two existing sections of sidewalk.
Justification: This project was requested by handicap residents using this route everyday.The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation
as well as bring the area into ADA compliance.
Project Cost Estimate($1:
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $101000 $0 $o $0 $10,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $110,000
Inspection&Administration $o $o $14,000 $0 $0 $0 $14,000
Contingency $0 $o $11,000 $0 $o $0 $11,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $145,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Infastructure Fund(198) $0 $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $145,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $145,000
Impact on Operations: This project will reduce maintenance and weed abatement costs from General Fund and LMD 38.
J-11
P162
A Key: 1189
Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road -Widening with Median Island
including Landscaped Median to Vineyard
Project location: RED
Foothill Boulevard from Grove \ HILL
Avenue to San Bernardino Road, COUNTRY'
including landscaped median to I CLUB _ PROJECT LOCATION
Vineyard Avenue �— -
FOOTHILL BLVD �-;,--
w
Q
Est.Construction Start/End:
To be determined
S P� w w U
Y Z
Project Status: 5 Q
Design
p ARROW ROUTE
B K
J
()
Department:
U MOKINLEY STREET
Engineering [YPA Project Manager: RD
Curt Billings �.....-_ 8TH STREET CITY LIMIT
Description: This project Is the last phase of the multi phased Foothill Boulevard street and bridge Improvements and includes right-of-way
acquisition,utility relocation,street widening,storm drain and landscape improvements,Including arches at both the west and
east City limits.
Justification: This project will provide increased traffic and pedestrian circulation Including safety and visual enhancements. The project is
identified in the City's General Plan,the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and has been marked as a City Council goal.
Project Cost Estimate($I:
Expenditure/Catecory Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 2015/1 2016/1 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $3,096,000 $0 $0 S30,000 $0 $0 $3,126,000
Right-of-Way $713,000 $0 $0 $141,000 $0 $0 $854,000
Construction $9,884,000 $0 50 $4,059,000 $0 $0 $13,943,000
Inspection&Administration $613,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $613,000
Contingency $1,289,000 $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $1,689,000
Total Costs: $15,595,000 $0 $0 $4,630,000 $0 $0 $20,225,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 20151 201617 201718 TOTAL
RDA-2001 TAB(650) $3.504,000 SO 50 $0 $0 $0 $3.504,000
RDA-2004 TAB(660) $11,694,000 $o so $o 5o $0 $11,684,000
Transportation Fund(124) $407,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $407,000
Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $4,630,000 $0 $0 $4,630,000
Total Costs: $15,595,000 $0 50 $4,630.000 50 $0 $20,225,000
Impact on Operations: This project adds one mile of additional landscape maintenance costs along Foothill Blvd,as well as some additional
street lights into SLID 1.
J-12
P163
A Key: 1847
Hellman Avenue at Metrolink Tracks - Widen Crossing
Project Location: >'
Hellman Avenue at Metrolink ill 9TH T. Illll
Tracks S
}
W ICITYYARD
Est Construction Start/End: Z
01/2014-05/2014
Project Status: 8TH ST. MLTROLINK
Design and Construction PROJECT L ATION ¢ [RACK
Z
Q
Department:
J
Engineering
77H ST.
Ll
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: Construction of traffic signal and widen the road at the Metrolink tracks.
Justification: This project will improve the flow of traffic,circulation and pedestrian safety due to a new traffic signal,wider road and sidewalks.
Project Cost Estimate I$j:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 201711 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $o $50,000 $0 $0 $o $50,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $o
Construction $0 $0 $659,000 $0 $0 $0 $659,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $15,600 $0 $0 $0 $15,600
Contingency $0 $0 $65,400 $0 $0 SO $65,400
Total Costs: $o $0 $790.000 $0 $o $0 $790,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Unknown $o $0 $790,000 $0 $0 $0 $790,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $790,000 $o $0 $0 $790,000
Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance. The estimated cost of electricity and
maintenance for a traffic signal is$2,500 per year. In addition,the street widening,sidewalks and new pavement
will mean less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up
maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas.
J-13
P164
JL Key:
Hermosa Park - Light Pole Replacements
Project Location: w
BANY
Hermosa Park �7n n L MENTA
nn
6787 Hermosa Avenue � i r� 0 I � 0���
nnN . . LJI�ILJI
a
00
Est.Construction Start/End:
08/2013-106/2014 t P T
Project Status:
19TH ST �
Requested FY 2013-2014
EPg MK J
Department:
Public Works Services LJULJIJLI
Project Manager:
Dean Rodia
Description: Remove and replace existing park light poles and conduit.
Justification: Safety-the existing light poles are rotting. Several light poles have already fallen over. Likewise,the electrical wiring and conduit
need to be replaced. Hermosa Park has gone dark several times when the electrical system suddenly failed.
Project Cost Estimate 151:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 TBD TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $D $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000
Inspection&Administration $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $25,000 $25,00
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 TED TOTAL
LMD 1 General City(130) $0 $0 So $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000
Impact on Operations: With new park light poles and conduit,the constant and significant demands for maintenance at Hermosa Park will
be greatly reduced.
J-14
P165
IL Key:
Lions Park East Community Center - Replace Flooring
Project Location:
Lions Park East Community Cen ter - j�l�� I�,'L i � _�
9161 Base Line Road UL1U I—J w �� LJULJL
Q � f
Q LINE RD-
Est.Construction Start/End: 0 S
08/2013-05/2014 O �..
RED a 1L
Project Status: E
MuN RO 7 LOCATIONS s
/� I7JI�I�
Requested FY 2013-2014 PARK /11 II IFS -"
a QQ ELL LII �
DepDepartment: (-1�
WRCH 5T
Public Works Services H JI\/II O I
(�7 �Lfpupu� f
Project Manager: l / � �
Ty Quaintance
Description: Replace existing VCT flooring tiles in Lions East Community Center. Flooring tiles will be replaced on a room by room basis
depending on available funds.
Justification: The existing floor tiles are cracked and brittle and need to be replaced.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Cateeory Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 201611 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 So 5o $0 $0 $o
Design/Plan Review 55,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $5,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o
Construction 50 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $60,000
Inspection&Administration 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $5,000 $0 $60,000 50 $0 $0 $65,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 21314 2014115 201516 21617 201718 TOTAL
Capital Reserve(025) $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $60,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $60,000 $o $0 $0 $60,000
Impact on Operations: The new floor tiles will require less maintenance.
J-15
JL Key: 1551 P1 VV
LIVID 1 Trail - Concrete Drainage Improvement
Project Location:
Various locations in LIVID 1.
3
Est.Construction Start/End: or
08/2013-03/2014
i
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014 —o
Department:
Public Works Services
� I
Project Manager: ®= PROJECT LOCATI
Dean Rodia
Description: Project includes the installation of 158 linear feet of water deflector bars at 4 locations and 320 square feet of concrete slab at 1
location along several communtiy trails in LMD 1.
Justification: This project will improve drainage,prevent costly and hazardous trail washouts,and improve public safety.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017118 TOTAL
Environmental/NPOES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 50 50 $0 $0 $0
Construction $98,530 $0 $19,100 $0 $0 50 $117,630
Inspection&Administration $0 $o $0 $0 $0 So $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $98,530 $0 $19,100 $0 So $0 $117,630
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTA L
Beautification(110) $98,530 $0 $19,100 $0 $0 $0 $117,630
Total Costs: $98,530 $0 $19,100 $0 $0 $0 $117,630
Impact on Operations: This project will reduce the ongoing maintenance costs of the LM 1 community trail system.
J-16
P167
JL Key: 1787
LMD 411 -Water Conservation and Landscape Renovations
Project Location:
LMD 411
I 4-A I
Est.Construction Start/End: I
02/2014—05/2014 I 1
Project Status: •�•
Design 0
SOLE NONE
1
Department: _
Engineering PROJECT
LOCATION
Project Manager:
Curt Billings
Description: Second phase of a multi-phased landscape retrofit for improved water conservation.
Justification: This project will replace high maintenance turf areas in the existing LMD 411 landscaping with more efficient drought tolerant
shrubs and hardswpe.This retrofit project will improve compliance with the City's current water conservation policy.
Project Cost Estimate(Sj:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 201611 TBD TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $o s0 s0 $0 $0 s0
Design/Plan Review s0 $0 s0 s0 50 $0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 50
Construction $355,000 $0 $355,000 $355,000 $0 $0 $1,065,000
Inspection&Administration $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $30,000
Contingency $35,000 $0 $35,000 $35,000 50 $0 $105,000
Total Costs: 5400,000 $0 $400,000 5400,000 $0 $0 $1,200,000
Project funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
LMD 4R(134) $400,000 s0 5400,000 5400,000 s0 $0 $1,200,000
Total Costs: $400,000 s0 $400,000 $400,000 s0 $0 $1,200,000
Impact on Operations: This project will reduce landscape maintenace costs for LMD 4R.
J-17
P168
A Key: 1843
Milliken Avenue at Mountain View Drive - Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn Phases
Project Location:
Milliken Avenue at Mountain View
Drive
PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL
VALENCIAAVE
EATHi
BASE LINE RD r i e - w - - - -
Y =._
Est.Construction Start/End: - -
01/2014-04/2014 TE0.FyA VISTP PKtyY
mo""p1H It6N
-
Project Status:
ST CR - If
Design f
aPROJECT LOCATION)
= GHU0.CH ST_
Department:
Engineering wrrosouE
FOOTHILL_ BLVD -
Project Manager. I
Jason Welday a
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,removing protected-permissive left turn phasing
and replacing with protected left turn phasing on Milliken Avenue for the traffic signal at this location.
Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by providing an exclusive phase for left turn vehicle movements. In
addition, pedestrian crossings will occur separate from left turn movements, which previously occurred simultaneously with
protected-permissive traffic signal equipment.
Project Cost Estimate($j:
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $2,000 $0 So $0 $2,000
Contingency $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $o $0 $2,000
Total Costs: $0 $o $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior year 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 201611 2017/18 TOTAL
Transportation(324) $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $o $0 $2S,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $25,000 $o $0 $0 $25,000
Impact on Operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left turn traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on
operations will be present.
J-18
JL Key: 1844 P169
Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway- Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn Phases
Project Location: PACIFIC EL 1L — -
Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista
i
Parkway C E N T R A L
PARKy' BASE LINE RD --- �— -_
Q
LU W_ W
w VISTA
Est.Construction Start/End: _ 'TERRA _
01/2014—04/2014
'< PROJECT LOCATION
Project Status: w — -—
Design Y
J
J_
� T
Department: Gt{URGFi S
Engineering
Project Manager:
FOOTHILL BLVD NOT TO SCALE
Jason Welday
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,removing protected-permissive left turn phasing
and replacing with protected left turn phasing on Milliken Avenue for the traffic signal at this location.
Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by providing an exclusive phase for left turn vehicle movements.In
addition, pedestrian crossings will occur separate from left turn movements, which previously occurred simultaneously with
protected-permissive traffic signal equipment.
Project Cost Estimate ISI:
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
Contingency $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Transportation(124) s0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Total Costs: $o $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Impact on Operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left turn traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on
operations will be present.
J-19
1L Key: 1253 P170
Milliken Avenue at Vintage Drive- Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn Phases
Project Location: WILSON AVE
Milliken Avenue at Vintage Drive
Q
a w
NOT TO SCALE z
LU
W
Y_
� O
-. 0
Est.Construction Start/End: - _ _ BANYAN ST— - -- - — —
01/2014-04/2014 �1 PROJECT LOCATION
Project Status: -— _—-— VINTAGE O
Design
Department: -- - -
Engineering
Project Manager:
Jason Welday
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,removing protected-permissive left turn phasing
and replacing with protected left turn phasing on Milliken Avenue forthe traffic signal at this location.
Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by providing an exclusive phase for left turn vehicle movements. In
addition, pedestrian crossings will occur separate from left turn movements, which previously occurred simultaneously with
protected-permissive traffic signal equipment.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000
Right-of-way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50
Construction $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
Contingency $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Transportation(124) $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Impact on Operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left turn traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on
operations will be present.
J-20
1L Key: 1775 P171
Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements-West to East City Limits
Project Location:
Pacific Electric Trail from West City ".• ,,.
Limits to East City Limits
Cr
i
Est Construction Start/End:
09/2014-12/2014
E project Status:
Design '\
d'a
Department: '_O OJ
Engineering
Project Manager.
Walt Stickney
Description: This project Includes the addition of various amenities along the trail. These amenities consist of replacing plaques and installing
other trail Improvements such as truncated domes at wheel chair ramps.
Justification: The trail from the west to east end was constructed in different phases,at different times,and by different contractors. Issues
have come up during the course of the last couple years by users of the trail that has prompted the need for this enhancement
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Cateeory Prior years 2013 14 2014115 201511 2016/1 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $0 So $0 so So
Design/Plan Review $o so $0 $0 so So $o
Right-of-Way so $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0
Construction $o So so $0 $110," $0 $no.000
Inspection&Administration $o So $0 So $o So $0
Contingency $0 $o $0 $0 so So $0
Total Costs: so $0 $0 $0 $11o'" So 5110,000
Project Funding:
Fundine Source Prior years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Beautification(110) $0 $o $o $o $10,000 $0 $10,000
City-wide Infrastructure Imp(198) $0 $o so so $100,000 $o $1o0,0o0
Total Costs: $0 $0 $o $o $110,000 $0 $110,000
Impact on Operations: Minimal impact on operations
J-21
P172
J Key: 1621
Red Hill Park - Pedestrian Paseo
Project location:
Red Hill Park Ell
7484 Vineyard Avenue
N.T.S.
LR
Est.Construction Start/End:
08/2012-1112012 RED U"
HILL U LI� =ELJ
COUNTRY
Project Status: CLUB
Design
Department: 0
Engineering
Project Manager:
o �a�fl�ooao
Walt Stickney �•;���� ��
Description: Construction of a concrete sidewalk and lightsin the south west corner between Red Hill Park and Carnelian Avenue.
Justification: Adds a pedestrian access to Red Hill Park from Carnelian Avenue
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 TBD TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Right-of-way $0 $0 So $o $0 $0 $o
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 $90,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000
Total Costs: $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $100,000 $115,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 TBD TOTAL
PD-85 Redemption(848) $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
Total Costs: $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $115,000
Impact on Operations: Minor impact.
J-22
1L Key. TED P173
Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain Phase 3 - East of Hellman Ave to Base Line Rd to Roberds, North
on Amethyst to 19th St, and Easterly 300 feet
Project Location: --.. - W ----
East of Hellman Avenue along the Q ;
north side of the Pacific Electric 19TH ST I
Trail, along Base Line Road to
Roberds Street, north in Amethyst
Street to 19th Street and easterly H > W
300 feet. < <
Z >- < <
K 7 F 0 O
Est.Construction Start/End: W W E f
4/2015—11/2015 m = uorvrE VISTA W
Q
Construction PROJECT LOCATION
Construction
PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL
Department: W
1
Engineering Q
BASE LINE RD 0�, BASE LINE RD
O
Project Manager: JQ
Romeo David
Description: Construct a Master Plan Storm Drain;install catch basins and manholes. In addition,Amethyst Street will be widened with curb&
gutter and sidewalks where necessary and the entire streets within the storm drain limits will be resurfaced upon completion.
Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life,use,and rideability.Also,during rain events it will provide improved
pedestrian access along Amethyst Street which serves Alta Loma Elementary School. In addition,a FEMA Flood Zone Letter of
Map Revision(LOMR)will be processed after completion removing the properties around the area from Zone A requiring
additional flood insurance.
Project Cost Estimate($):
ExpenditureExoenditure/Cates gory Prior Years 201311 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 5o $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 % $0 $0 $0
Right-of-Way $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o
Construction $0 $0 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $400,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $3,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,900,000
Project Funding:
Funding Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Unknown $0 $0 $3,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,900,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $3,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,900,000
Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and a reduction of street repair
maintenace costs for pothole and crack repairs,thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas.
J-23
IL Key: 1842 P174
Various Intersections - Safety Light Upgrades
Project Location:
E LINE RD BASE LINE RD
Foothill Boulevard at the
y
intersections of Vineyard Avenue, ONS� PARK
Archibald Avenue,and Haven RED
Avenue HILL
MMUNITY
PARK
CHURCH ST -
Est.Construction Start/End: _
09/2013-11/2013 - _
Project Status: PROJECT LOCATIONI
Design
FOOTHILL BLVD
6616
u1
Department: - -
Engineeringd WQ
¢qZ - - _ >
Project Manager: V �d I
ARROW ROUTE
NOT TO SCALE —
Jason Welday - - - --- - -
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installing additional safety lighting at existing
signalized intersections.
Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by enhancing the visibility at the intersection.
Project Cost Estimate($j:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $130,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,000
Contingency $0 $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $0 $13,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Transportation(124( $0 $0 $150,000 $o $o $o $150,000
Total costs: $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $o $150,000
Impact on operations: The project will increase the cost for electrical service,and maintenance to replace lamps will occur approximately
every 5 years.
J-24
P175
1L Key
Windrows Park- Fire Lane Repair
Project location:
Windrows Park
6849 Victoria Park Lane
PROJECT �a
LOCATIO
Est.Construction Start/End: _�
Unknown O Lid
NARK
ARK
1
Project Status:
Unfunded 0
F-
Department: Q0_ (7
Public Works (\III\emu 7\\IIL�n � IS
Project Manager:
a
Tim Faulkner
Description: Removal of the existing 'Turf Block"fire lane and replacing it with poured concrete. The fire lane is accessed from Bougainvilla
Way.
Justification: This Fire lane serves as pedestrian and emergency services access to the Park as well as the adjacent elementary school.It was
constructed In the 19805 and over the past 20 years has become extremely uneven due to adjacent tree roots pushing up the turf
block. Replacement with poured concrete should prevent further damage and mitigate the existing trip hazards.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Exoenditure/Cateeory Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Right-of-Way 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Construction $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 201711 TOTAL
Unfunded $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Total Casts: $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Impact on Operations: The project will be coordinated with The Windrows Elementary School,the Community Services Department and
the Fire District so that all are aware of the timing and the lack of access for the construction period. With the
paving of this path,maintenance cost would be reduced.
J-25
P176
STAFF REPORT -
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
RANCHO
Date: June 13, 2013 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: John R. Gillison, City Manager
By: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director
Subject: APPROVAL OF CITY GENERAL FUND RESERVE FUNDING GOALS POLICY
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached City General Fund Reserve Funding
Goals Policy.
BACKGROUND
This City General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy establishes the methodology for the funding
goals for each of the City General Fund reserves, including the replacement of vehicles, equipment,
and computer equipment/technology. While the City established many of these reserves in prior
years, some did not have specific methodologies assigned to them in order to quantify the goal for
the reserve. This policy formalizes the City General Fund reserves, establishes some new ones,
and sets quantifiable goals for each reserve. In accordance with the policy, upon the completion of
the City's annual audit, the Finance Director prepares a schedule summarizing the funding status of
each reserve for use by the City Manager in future budgetary planning.
This policy does,not apply to reserves determined to be nonspendable in accordance with the City's
Fund Balance Policy nor does it apply to reserves that pertain to outstanding encumbrances (i.e.,
purchase orders) or unrealized gain on investments (GASB31) as of fiscal year end.
hVnance\budge12014\City Council staff reports\Gen't Fund mseme fundinggoals polity 06-13-13.doc
P177
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY GENERAL FUND
RANCHO RESERVE FUNDING GOALS
CUCAMONGA POLICY
POLICY NO.:
PAGE 1 OF 4
EFFECTIVE: June 13,2013
REVISED:
APPROVED:
PURPOSE
This City General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy establishes the methodology for the
funding goals for each of the City General Fund reserves, including the replacement of vehicles,
equipment, and computer equipment/technology. This policy does not apply to reserves
determined to be nonspendable in accordance with the City's Fund Balance Policy nor does it
apply to reserves that pertain to outstanding encumbrances (i.e., purchase orders) or unrealized
gain on investments (GASB31) as of fiscal year end. Upon the completion of the City's annual
audit, this policy directs the Finance Director to prepare a schedule summarizing the funding
status of each reserve as of the audit date. This schedule will serve as a tool for budgetary
planning for the funding of each reserve.
GENERAL POLICY
Following is a detailed description of the methodology for the funding goals for each of the City
General Fund reserves referred to above.
Self-insurance
The minimum insurance reserve in the past has been three times the annual Self Insured
Retention (SIR) in each program (Worker's Compensation, General Liability and Employment
Practices Liability). The SIR is essentially the City's deductible in each program. The reserve
goal is now established at five times the SIR to allow for five full limit claims in any one year.
Those numbers are calculated as follows: Worker's Comp ($250,000 SIR) is $1,250,000.
General Liability ($500,000 SIR) is $2,500,000. Employment Practices ($250,000 SIR) is
$1,250,000. The total proposed reserve is $5,000,000. This level of reserves protects the City's
assets by ensuring adequate funding in the event of multiple large claims against the City.
City General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy 178
Page 2 of 4
Employee leave payouts
The funding goal for this reserve is established at 100% of the current value of vacation, sick
leave and comp time payouts per the respective City MOUs. Additionally, included in this
funding goal is the value of the three years of furloughs for City employees.
Information technology
The funding goal for this reserve is based on the City's Cost Allocation Plan (CAP). The CAP
allocates the proportionate share of the City's central services departments that pertain to efforts
in support of the City's land management software. The CAP includes costs associated with
Information Services staff time, maintenance contracts, and general administrative allocations.
The funding goal is equal to two year's worth of CAP allocations. The source for this reserve is
6.67% of all building permit fees and building inspection fees collected during the fiscal year,
also referred to as the Information Technology Fee.
Booking fees
The funding goal for this reserve is equal to the value of 18 months of booking fees that could be
charged by the County of San Bernardino in the event that backfill funding is not provided by the
State of California. The funding goal is calculated using the most recent annual report from the
San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department to determine the number of bookings multiplied by
the most recent estimated booking fee approved by the County of San Bernardino.
City facilities capital repairs
The funding goal for City facilities capital repair is established at a minimum goal of 25% of
capital assets value comprised of construction in progress (excluding infrastructure), building
improvements, and improvements other than buildings for governmental activities.
Changes in economic circumstances
The funding goal for changes in economic circumstances is established at a six month reserve, or
50% of the City General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year.
Law enforcement
The funding goal for this reserve is the equivalent of 50% of the most recently approved
Schedule A from the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department.
Economic and community development special services
The funding goal for this reserve is $4,500,000 to pay for contract services associated with
Economic and Community Development (ECD) special projects or ECD initiatives/Council
goals (such as upcoming economic strategy and Development Code contract services) as well as
City General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy 179
Page 3 of 4
a one year value of staffing costs for Planning, Building and Safety and Engineering (not
including capital and project management). Funding for this reserve would be provided by
unspent revenue from Planning, Building and Safety, and Engineering (not including capital and
project management) on an annual basis.
Sphere of Influence analysis
The funding goal for this reserve is established at $3,000,000. The reserve is intended to provide
funds for a multi-year effort to analyze the physical constraints and opportunities within the
sphere area, provide required environmental analysis, and plan for the eventual annexation of the
remaining unincorporated areas within the City sphere of influence. The eventual annexation
requires pre-zoning, CEQA compliance, and a comprehensive service plan. The reserve
amount reflects estimates of cost proposed by the City staff in consultation with experts familiar
with the City process and geography.
Multi-species habitat conservation plan
A funding goal of $1,500,000 is established to support the creation of a multi-species habitat
conservation plan. This consultant-prepared plan would provide the necessary support for
identifying and preserving adequate wildlife habitat to support State and Federal regulatory
requirements. These plans typically provide a comprehensive approach to habitat preservation,
and facilitate development of property not included as mitigation lands both within the
designated limits of the City, and its sphere of influence.
Working capital
The funding goal for the City's General Fund working capital reserve is established at a goal of a
minimum of 5% of the City's General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year.
Animal Center operations
The funding goal for this reserve is 6 months' expenditures for operations, excluding capital
expenditures and fund-raising/special events for the upcoming fiscal year.
General Plan update
The funding goal is equal to the cost to update the City's General Plan based on the most recent
contract awarded. The source for this reserve is 1.3% of all building permit fees and building
inspection fees collected during the fiscal year, also referred to as the General Plan Update Fee.
180
City General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy
Page 4 of 4
City infrastructure
The funding goal for City infrastructure is established at a minimum goal of 25% of
infrastructure assets value comprised of road system (excluding right of way), storm drain
system, off-road trails system, and fiber optic lines for governmental activities.
Radio system acquisition
This reserve is established to fund the future acquisition or replacement of the City's 800 MHz
radios, as well as the City's proportionate share of the Countywide radio infrastructure. The
funding goal is established at 100% of the replacement cost of the radios and 100% of the
proportionate cost of the Countywide radio infrastructure.
Mobile Home Park Program
The Building and Safety Department is responsible for enforcing the State mobilehome laws and
has adopted the State's related schedule of fees. One of the fees collected is retained by the City
to cover the cost of mandatory inspections performed by the Building and Safety Department in
accordance with Title 25. The fee also covers the cost of educational materials and related
printing services. The funding goal for this reserve is equal to the cost of a contract inspector for
the mobilehome park inspections for eight parks within the City.
Vehicle and equipment replacement
The funding goal is established at 105% of capital assets value comprised of vehicles and
equipment for governmental activities.
Computer equipment/technology replacement
The funding goal is established at 105% of capital assets value comprised of vehicles and
equipment for governmental activities.
Technology fee
The funding goal of this reserve is equal to the implementation costs to replace and/or upgrade
the City's land management software (Accela). The funding source for this reserve is a flat 4.5%
technology charge on all permits and inspections.
P181
STAFF REPORT -
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
RANCHO
Date: June 13, 2013 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Fire Protection District
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director
Subject: REPAYMENT OF FUNDS ADVANCED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the repayment of funds advanced by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District upon request by the City.
ANALYSIS
Beginning in FY 1994/95 the City of Rancho Cucamonga transferred General Fund monies through
the annual budget process to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) on an annual
basis in order to provide the anticipated level of funding needed by the District to maintain adequate
fire protection services for the community. The City provided financial support for District
operations for 14 consecutive years. In total, $19,292,698 in principal and interest represents the
value of the advanced funds.
With the dissolution of redevelopment agencies statewide, special districts, which includes our
District, are now receiving additional one-time revenues that were part of prior Redevelopment
Agency reserves. Approval of this report will allow the District to, upon request by the City and
when it becomes financially viable for the District, repay the funds advanced by the City. The City
and District will evaluate when, and in what amount, the District can repay these advanced funds.
When appropriate, the City will submit a payment demand to the District until the advanced funds,
including accrued interest, are fully repaid.
Respectfully Submitted,
Tamara L. Layne
Finance Director
rlfinancelbudget20141City Council staff reportslCity and FD repayment of funds advanced 06-13-13.doc
P182
STAFF REPORT -
KANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
RANCHO
Date: June 13, 2013 CUCAMONGA
To: President and Members of the Board of Directors
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief
By: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director
Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT GENERAL FUND PRELIMINARY BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF
$24,742,110 AND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $31,808,076 FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 AND SET FINAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL BUDGET FOR
JULY 17, 2013
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of Directors approve and adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District General Fund Preliminary Budget in the amount of $24,742,110; approve the
attached resolution adopting the General Fund's Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit in the amount of
$31,808,076 for Fiscal Year 2013/14; and set approval of a final budget for the July 17, 2013 Board
Meeting.
BACKGROUND
The Fire District's General Fund Preliminary Budget for Fiscal Year 2013/14 is herein
recommended for adoption by the Board of Directors. Budget workshops were held on May 30,
2013 and June 6, 2013, which included specific discussion regarding the preliminary budget.
The proposed budget continues to meet the Council/Fire Board direction of operating
independently. The Fire District was able to achieve a proposed balanced budget through a
combination of slight revenue increases and continued improvements of operational and
administrative efficiencies.
The State of California Constitution, Article XIIIB, requires that an appropriations limit be
established annually by the Board of Directors. The factor used to develop the appropriations limit
is the C.P.I. change and the change in the city's population. The attached resolution adopts the
annual appropriations limit as required by the Article XIIIB of the State Constitution.
Based on the factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. change of 5.12% and a population change of
1.13%) per the State of California Department of Finance, the District's Fiscal Year 2013/14
General Fund's appropriations limit is $31,808,076. The District's Fiscal Year 2013/14 General
Fund appropriations subject to this limit total $25,545,330. It is anticipated that the District will be at
80.31% of its Gann Limit at June 30, 2014.
P183
CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION PAGE 2
DISTRICT GENERAL FUND PRELIMINARY BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,742,110
AND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF$31,808,076 FOR FISCAL YEAR
2013/14 AND SET FINAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL BUDGET FOR JULY 17, 2013
Please refer to the City Manager's Executive Summary for specific details regarding the Fire
District's General Fund. The advertised public hearing for adoption of the Fire District General Fund
Final Budget is set for July 17, 2013.
Respectfully submitted,
Mike Bell
Fire Chief
Attachment
P184
RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-026
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A
GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2013/14 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California provides that
the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government for
the prior year be adjusted for change in the cost of living and population except as otherwise
provided in Sections (5), (7) and (8) of said Article X111-B. These exclusions are: Debt Service
Funds, Revenue Bonds, Federal Funds and Grants, Contingencies, Emergencies, Enterprise
Funds, Capital Improvement Carry-Overs, Capital Equipment, Intra-Governmental Service
Funds, Reserves for Workers Compensation, Long-Term Disability, Retirement, Unemployment
and other reserve funds that are deemed reasonable and proper per the aforementioned
sections; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIII-B of the Constitution of the State of
California, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District deems it to
be in the best interest of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to establish a General
Fund appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2013/14; and
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has determined that
said General Fund's appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2013/14 be established in the amount of
$31,808,076.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District that a General Fund appropriations limit for Fiscal Year
2013/14 pursuant to Article XIII-B of the Constitution of the State of California be established in
the amount of$31,808,076 and the same is hereby established.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit herein established may
be changed as deemed necessary by resolution of the Board of Directors.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13`h day of June, 2013.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
L. Dennis Michael, President
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary
P185
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District, at a Meeting of said Board on the day of June, 2013.
Executed this _day of June 2013, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary
P186
STAFF REPORT
RANCHO CUC AMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
RANCHO
Date: June 13, 2013 CUCAMONGA
To: President and Members of the Board of Directors
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief
By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN
THE AMOUNT OF $6,870,790 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN
THE AMOUNT OF $12,116,607 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 IN COMMUNITIES
FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD) NO. 85-1
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Fire Board approve the attached resolutions adopting the Mello-Roos
CFD No. 85-1 annual budget for Fiscal Year 2013/14 in the amount of $6,870,790 and the
Appropriations Limit in the amount of$12,116,607.
BACKGROUND
Since Fiscal Year 1986/87, the Board has annually adopted a CFD budget to provide for operations
and maintenance costs attributable to providing fire protection services within CFD No. 85-1. The
proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2013/14 provides funding for a portion of the personnel and
operational costs necessary to maintain existing fire and life safety service levels within CFD
boundaries. The remaining operational and maintenance costs within the CFD are provided
through the Fire District's General Fund budget.
When the Fire District's CFD No. 85-1 was approved by the voters in 1985, an appropriations limit
was established at $1,775,000 (1985 costs for operations and maintenance). In order to adjust the
maximum spending authority (appropriations limit) to meet increased costs for operations and
maintenance, the voters authorized the District to annually adjust the limit. This adjustment is
based upon the same methodology used in calculating public agency Prop. 4 spending limits under
Article XIIIB of the State of California Constitution. The factors used to develop the appropriations
limit are the C.P.I. change and the change in the city's population. The attached resolution adopts
the annual appropriations limit as required by Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. Based on the
factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. change of 5.12% and a population change of 1.13%) per the
State of California Department of Finance, the District's CFD No. 85-1 fiscal year 2013/14
appropriations limit is $12,116,607. The District's CFD No. 85-1 Fiscal Year 2013/14 appropriations
subject to this limit total $6,402,810. It is anticipated that the District will be at 52.84% of its Gann
Limit at June 30, 2014.
P187
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT PAGE 2
OF$6,870,790 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF
$12,116,607 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 IN COMMUNITIES FACILITIES DISTRICT(CFD)NO.
85-1
JUNE 13,2013
On May 30 and June 6, 2013, the City Council/Fire District Board of Directors conducted
comprehensive workshops regarding all budgets which included the proposed CFD No. 85-1. The
resolutions adopting CFD No. 85-1's annual budget and appropriations limit are now presented for
your consideration of approval.
Respectfully submitted,
Mike Bell
Fire Chief
Attachments
Resolution No. FD 13-027
Resolution No. FD 13-028
P188
RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-027
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14
WHEREAS, a special election was held in the Mello-Roos Community Facilities
District No. 85-1 (the "Community Facilities District') of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District'), on Tuesday, December 10, 1985;
and
WHEREAS, as a result of the election, more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified
electors voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression
services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit based upon changes in cost of living and
changes in population; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received and reviewed a budget for Fiscal
Year 2013/14 for the Community Facilities District.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. Adoption of Budget. The Board of Directors hereby approves and
adopts the budget designated:
Mello-Roos Community Facilities
District No. 85-1
Annual Budget
for
Fiscal Year 2013/14
a copy of said budget being on file in the office of the Community
Facilities District and available for public inspection.
Section 2. Filing of Budget. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to
forward a certified copy of this resolution and a copy of the budget to
the Office of the Auditor-Controller for the County of San Bernardino.
P189
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this_day of , 2013
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
L. Dennis Michael, President
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary
I,JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by
the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of
said Board held on the_day of 2013.
Executed this day of 2013 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary
Resolution No. 13-0_- Page 2 of 2
P190
RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-028
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE X11113 OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION
WHEREAS, a special election was held in the Mello-Roos Community Facilities
District No. 85-1 (the "Community Facilities District') of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the 'District'), on Tuesday, December 10,
1985; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the election, more than two-thirds (2/3) of the
qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire
suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit and to annually adjust the
special tax and appropriations limit based upon changes in cost of living and changes in
population; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to establish the appropriations limit
for the Community Facilities District 85-1 for Fiscal Year 2013/14;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. Appropriations Limit. This Board of Directors hereby establishes the
Fiscal Year 2013/14 appropriations limit for the Community Facilities
District No. 85-1 at $12,116,607 based on the factors of the Gann
limit (a C.P.I. change of 5.12% and a population change of 1.13%)
per the State of California Department of Finance.
Section 2. Approval of Electorate. This Board of Directors hereby finds and
determines that the foregoing appropriations limit has been
established by the qualified electorate at a special election held on
December 10, 1985, in the manner provided by law.
Section 3. Filing. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to file a
certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors for
San Bernardino County and with the office of the Auditor-Controller
for the State of California.
P191
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this _day of 2013.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
L. Dennis Michael, President
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved
and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a
special meeting of said Board held on the_day of 2013.
Executed this _day of 2013 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary
Resolution No. 13-028 - Page 2 of 2
P192
STAFF REPORT
RANCHO CUCANIONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
RANCHO
Date: June 13, 2013 CUCAMONGA
To: President and Members of the Board of Directors
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief
By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN
THE AMOUNT OF $2,023,430 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN
THE AMOUNT OF $2,915,959 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 IN COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $2,023,430 and the
appropriations limit in the amount of $2,915,959 for Fiscal Year 2013/14 in Mello-Roos
Community Facilities District No. 88-1.
BACKGROUND
On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District No. 88-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to
provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board
adopted an ordinance authorizing the levy of a special tax in CFD 88-1. The ordinance
authorizes the District, by resolution, to annually levy the special tax for purposes of land
acquisition, fire station construction, purchase of equipment and operations and
maintenance costs (which includes personnel) to provide fire protection services within
CFD 88-1.
Fiscal Year 2013/14 is the twenty-fifth (25) consecutive year the District has levied a
special tax to provide required revenues for capital improvements (land, fire station facility,
equipment) and fire protection services (personnel, operations and maintenance (O&M))
within this CFD. Accordingly, the Fiscal Year 2013/14 budget includes fully burdened
personnel costs associated with existing memorandums of understanding between the
District and its bargaining units. Because CFD 88-1 does not currently generate sufficient
funds to fully support the total annual staffing costs, supplemental funding will be necessary
through the Fire District's General Fund budget.
P193
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN THE PAGE 2
AMOUNT OF$2,023,430 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE
AMOUNT OF$2,915,959 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 88-1
JUNE 13, 2013
The following resolutions are submitted for your consideration to adopt the Fiscal Year
2013/14 annual budget and appropriations limit in CFD No. 88-1.
1. A resolution adopting the Fiscal Year 2013/14 proposed budget in the amount of
$2,023,430.
2. A resolution adopting the Fiscal Year 2013/14 appropriations limit in an amount
equal to the maximum authorized special taxes which could be levied in Fiscal Year
2013/14. The resolution sets an appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2013/14 at
$2,915,959.
On May 30 and June 6, 2013, the Board conducted comprehensive budget workshops
regarding all budgets which included the proposed CFD No. 88-1 budget. The resolutions
adopting the CFD No. 88-1 annual budget and appropriations limit are now presented for
your consideration,of approval.
Respectfully Submitted,
Mike Bell
Fire Chief
Attachments
Resolution No. FD 13-029
Resolution No. FD 13-030
P194
RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-029
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,APPROVING AND
ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013114
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative
body") has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received
a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a
community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the
"Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1,
Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This Community
Facilities is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (hereinafter
referred to as the "District"); and
WHEREAS, this legislative body has received and reviewed a budget for
Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the District.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. Adoption of Budget. The Board of Directors hereby approves
and adopts the budget designated: "Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District No. 88-1 Annual Budget for Fiscal Year
2013/14" and is on file in the office of the District and available for
public inspection.
P195
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June, 2013.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
L. Dennis Michael, President
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary
I, JANCIE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held on the 13`h day of June,
2013.
Executed this day of June 2013, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary
Resolution No. FD 13-029 - Page 2 of 2
P196
RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-030
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013114 PURSUANT
TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the
"legislative body") has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election
and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special
tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions
of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", as amended, being Chapter 2.5,
Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This
Community Facilities District is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and
WHEREAS, as a result of such election, the qualified electors of the District
authorized the establishment of an Article XIII-B appropriations limit forthe District equal to
the maximum authorized special taxes which may be levied in any fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, this legislative body desires to establish the appropriations limit
for the District for Fiscal Year 2013/14.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1. Appropriations Limit. This legislative body hereby establishes
the appropriations limit for Community Facilities District No. 88-
1 for Fiscal Year 2013/14 in an amount equal to $2,915,959.
SECTION 2. Approval by Electorate. This legislative body hereby finds and
determines that the foregoing appropriations limit has been
authorized by the qualified electors of the District at a special
election held on April 4, 1989, in the manner provided by law.
P197
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 2013.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
L. Dennis Michael, President
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved,
and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a
special meeting of said Board held of the 13th day of June, 2013.
Executed this day of June 2013, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary
Resolution No. 13-030 - Page 2 of 2
P198
STAFF REPORT
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
RANCHO
Date: June 13, 2013 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director
Subject: ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 BUDGET AND ARTICLE XIIIB
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
RECOMMENDATION
1. Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the Fiscal Year 2013/14 budget.
2. Council approve the attached resolution adopting the Article X11113 Appropriations Limit for
Fiscal Year 2013/14.
BACKGROUND
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has proposed a one-year program of service with the
2013/14 fiscal year budget. The attached resolution adopts that one-year budget following the
Council's deliberations at the publicly held budget study sessions.
FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 BUDGET
General Fund $ 65,240,470
Library Services $ 4,138,190
Special Funds $ 66,888,200
Total $136,266,86Q
2. The State of California Constitution, Article XIIIB, requires that an appropriations limit be
established annually by the City Council. The factor used to develop the appropriations limit
is the C.P.I. change and the change in the City's population per the State of California
Department of Finance. The additional attached resolution adopts the annual appropriations
limit as required by Article XIIIB of the State Constitution.
Based on the factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. change of 5.12% and a population change
of 1.13%), the City's Fiscal Year 2013/14 appropriations limit is $68,227,352. The City's
Fiscal Year 2013/14 appropriations subject to this limit total $52,802,550. It is anticipated
that the City will be at 77.39% of its Gann Limit at June 30, 2014.
Attachments
Resolutions
rlfinance/budget2014/City Counalstaffreports/City budget adoption 2013-14.doc
P199
RESOLUTION NO. 13-081
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE
CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council held two workshops to review the
appropriation requests for Fiscal Year 2013/14 on May 30, 2013 and June 6, 2013, and;
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a public meeting on the General
City Budget, and;
WHEREAS, this public meeting was noticed in accordance with applicable laws and held
on June 13, 2013;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve on this 13`h day of June 2013, as follows:
Section 1: Adoption of Fiscal Year 2013/14 Budget. The City of Rancho Cucamonga
budget for Fiscal Year 2013/14, on file in the office of the Finance Director, is hereby adopted in
the amount of $136,266,860. This budget total includes appropriations for both the general and
other special purpose funds.
Section 2: Transfers of Funds Between and/or Within Appropriations. The City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga may transfer funds between funds or activities set forth in the
budget. The City Manager may transfers funds between appropriations within any fund as set
forth in the budget and may transfer appropriations between activities within any cost center in
the same fund.
Section 3: Transfers of Funds Between Funds. Transfers of funds between funds as
shown throughout the fund transfer sections of the budget shall be made as expenditures
warrant such transfers.
Section 4: Disbursements. The City Manager and the Finance Director, or the duly
designated representative, are hereby empowered and authorized to disburse funds pursuant to
appropriations provided for in the Fiscal Year 2013/14 Budget, and have the responsibility to
establish procedures and to administratively implement and control the budget on all matters,
except direct expenditures by Councilmembers which require Council approval.
Section 5: Additional Appropriations. The City Council may amend this temporary
budget to add or delete appropriations.
Section 6: Personnel. The City Manager is hereby empowered and authorized to
develop and fill additional positions as deemed necessary to conduct City operations provided
funding is available in the budget.
P200
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13`" day of June, 2013.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an
adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 13th day of June 2013.
Executed this day of June 2013, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
P2O1
RESOLUTION NO. 13-082
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING
AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE
XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2013/14
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the State of California provides that the total annual
appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government shall not exceed
the appropriations limit of such entity of government for the prior year adjusted for changes in
the cost of living and population except as otherwise provided in said Article XIIIB, and;
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of
California, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga deems it to be in the best
interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish an appropriations limit for Fiscal Year
2013/14, and;
WHEREAS, the Finance Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
determined that said appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2013/14 be established in the amount of
$68,227,352.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve that an appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2013/14
pursuant to Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California be established in the
amount of $68,227,352 and the same is hereby established.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit herein established
may be changed as deemed necessary by resolution of the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13'h day of June, 2013.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
P202
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an
adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 13th day of June 2013.
Executed this day of June 2013, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
i1financelbudget20131City Council staff reportslResolution-City Appropriations Limit 2012-13.doc