Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1979/04/04 - Agenda Packet
t AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , Regular Meeting April 4, 1979 1 CALL TO ORDER. 2. PLEDGE TO FLAG 3. ROLL CALL: Mikels_�__, Palombo—I., , Schlosser, West_, Frosts. 4 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: (Not Included) 5 ANNOUNCEMENTS. 6 COMMITTEE REPORTS a. Advisory Committee (A report with Ordinance No 71 will be heard under Public Hearings ) b. Historical rormission 7 CONSENT CALENDAR: The following Consent Calendar IU,ms are expectad to be routine and non - controversial They will be acted upw, by the Council at one tine without discussion Any Council axmbor, staff rember, or Interested W :y My request that an Item be removed from the Consent Calendar for later discussion a Approval of Warrants in the amount of $117,439 77. 1 ) b. Approve Alcoholic Beverage License for on -sale general -- Boars Head, 6620 Carnelian, Rancho Cueamonge, 91701. .. 10 c Request Attendance at American Planning Association meeting. Authorization is requested for the Community Development Director to attend the American Planning Association, California Chapter meeting in San Oiaoo in April 1979 Although funds were not specifically budgeted for attondonce at this conference, it is our recommendation that approval be qranted The APA meetings are of consideratle value to the planning staff and they help to keep the planning profession updated on current concepts in municipal planning RICOt4MENDAT:ON: It is recommended that the Community .; Development Dirertor be authorized to attend the American Planning Association California Chapter meetinq in San Deigo. Anticipated cost of the conference is s200. Y] k , L Z 4 IQ y'� 4 p{ , i April 4, 1979 Agenda A 1? d. A Acceptance of Gift From Theta Cable Inc ... The present cable telvision a f 2% of gross receipts. hacommunities ffered f Cucamonga In accordance with the provisions of the Government Code, it is 3 3% offered t e Z Zooninpu l lrcineareng A 1979. - Zone Chan a No. 79 -0F. - City of Rancho Cucamonga For public 13 ear ng be ore the C ty Council on A Tract 9131 Release of Cash Bands to Sagewood Hams, g. T Inc. Cash Bond - Lot 8 $2,000.00 Cash Bond - Lot 7 S 150.00 Tract 9226: Release h T se o Bond i. T Tract 9274 6 S Sense o j T Tract 9274 Accept roads and release bond to M.J Brock L Sons, Inc. 172,000 Performance Bond (Road) $ k T Tract 9280 bond Builder, u. I 1 T Tract 9295 s and release bond to Socaland Corporation M. T Tract 9302 Release of Bonds to Vanguard Builders. Inc Performance Bond (Sewer) S �!m Performance B : s s- n. T Tract 9305: Release of bonds to the Jones Company w,rP Performance Bond ( S 50,000 Performance Bond (Water) i r City Council Agenda -3- April 4, 1979 o. Tract 9313. Accept roads and release bonds to Socaland Corporation Performance Bond (Road) S 78,000 p. Tract 9314: Accept roads and release bond to John D. Lusk 6 Son Performance Band (Road) $168,000 q. Tract 9321 Release of Cash staking deposit to Crowell/ Leventhal, Inc. Cash staking deposit $ 3,700 r Tract 9321: Release of bond to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond (Landscaping)$ 18,975 s Tract 9322: Release of cash staking deposit to Lewis Homes of California. Cash staking deposit $ 3,650 t Tract 9753: Release of bond to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc ' Performance Bond (Landscaping)$ 8,728.50 U. Tract 9358: Release of cash staking deposit to Crowell/ Leventhall, Inc Cash staking deposit $ 11900 V. Tract 9358 Release of bond to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond (Road) $ 801000 w T-ect 9381: Accept roads and release bond to Lesny /Wilshire Properties. 989? Performance Bond (Road) $136,000 x Tract Accept roads and release bond to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. Performance Bond (Road) $ 82,000 y Tract 9447: Release of bonds to Walton Construction Corporation. Labor b Material (Sewer) $ 6,500 Labor 5 Material (Water) S 9,500 Tract 9450: Release of bond to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond (Landscaping)$ 5,225 as Tract 9484 Accept roads and release bond to David W Long Performance Bond (Road) S 42,000 bb. Tract 9569 Accept roads and release bond to Don Lee S Construction Performance Bond (Road) $134,000 w cc Tract 9616: Release of cash staking deposit to H J. ,c+ Brock b Sons. Cash staking deposit S 3,050 44<. r 3. City Council Agenda -4- April 4, 1979 dd Refer Insurance Claim by R J. Stever d Company for Lydia Mosqueda to the City attorney for handll..g ..... .. .... . 66 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Ito. 79 -01 - Sion Ordinance.. .. 68 2 An amendment to the zoning ordinance to add a new sign c ordinance and repeal all existing sign provision%. ORDINANCE NO. 65 (second reading) ' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ( RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOTPING A COMPRE- HENSIVE SIGN ORDINANCE AND REPEALING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE PERTAINING TO SIGN REGULATION I r B The Cit founcil of Rancho Cucamon a last Se temper_ anointed a 60 of grsons to act as the t s star ca Commtssi on. Their taSK was to recomnnd necessary y easures to the ounc ( to ent es ovate reserve an protect the hi isfor c resources n our C ty. ORDINANCE NO. 70 (Second Reading) 90 .}� tJ' D AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ".AL FORNIA, CREATING AN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO ACT IN ADVISORY CAPACITi TO CITY COUNCIL iN A THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS, EVENTS, STRUCTURES AND SITES AND TO IDENTIFY PERSONS OF q HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 1(� D 4 ll}} C. Ordinance for the Establishment of Storm Drain and System Deve opment Fee. . 100 The Community Development Department is proposing for adoption thp, establishment of a storm Drain fee of $2,500 per acre to i be applied to land divisions and the issuance of building r permits and a Systems Development fee of one percent (if) ^ on the building valuation to be assessed at the time of i•1 development These fees will be used for the exclusive purpose of ofPlaning, Engineering. and constructing street KM. and storm r' `Jt� ": City Council Agenda -5- April 4, 1979 ,"'L.`OROINANCE NO. 61 (Second Reading .. .... ... .. .... . .. 100 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE 04 NEW DEVELOPMENT RESOLUTION NO. 79 -10 .. .. .... ...... .. . . ... ... .. 102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY C=4CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO. 61 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D. Amendment to the City's 201 School Fee Ordinance. .. .. . . 103 At the previous City Council me ^.tin, the Council directed staff' to prepare an amendment to the 201 Ordinance to of land include language from S8201 that would allow the dedicatio�Dn; - ORDINANLEnNO'e74 �PirstnReadin9)s ��A ~y� n�{��/�*'�'r 104 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TYYOF YNU Ufl' CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNI4, AMENDING ORDINANCE 110. 30, WHICH (� PERTAINS TO THE FINAIICING OF INTERIM SCHOOL FACILITIES, AND TO PROVIDE FOR ThE DEDICATION OF LAND Ill LIEU OF FEES E Amendment to Current Moratorium Ordinance ... .... 105 An amendment to the cu,rent moratorium ordnance which Mould allow the City to process a parcel map where only one buildable parcel can result, th:reby allowing opportunities for single home builders to proceed. The amendment includes the paragraph that the City Council concurred with at the previous City Council meeting ORDINANCE NO. 73 (Urgency) .. .. 106 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY % PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 110. 64 TO EXEMPT PARCEL MAPS WHERE ONLY ONE (1) NEW DWELLING UNIT CAN RESULT FROM THE MORATORIUM ESTABLISHED BY ORDINAICE NO. 64, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF vt City Council Agenda -6- April 4, 1979 F. Amendment to the Zonin Ordinance Re carding Regulations ....... 107 dome ccupat ons. At the last City Council meeting, certain structural problems were found in the draft of the Ordinance establishing new home occupation regulations. This Ordinance has been reviewed by the City Attorney and the structural errors corrected ORDINANCE N0. 72 (First Reading) .. ... .. ... ...... 100 AN ORDINANCE OF 'HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTION 61 024A (b) (3), WENDING SECTION 61.022, AND ADDING SECTION 61.0219 (a) (9) OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE REGULATION OF HOME OCCUPATIONS R? Fr! From Citizens Advisor Committee regarding Parking. of �ecreat one Vehic es gn C ty 5treats. The Citizens Advisory Committee representing the camrunities of Etiwanda, Aita Loma, and Cucamonga have reviewed a problem concerning the parking of recreational vehicles on city streets. After considerable discussion, the Advisory Committee has recommended an ordinance which would prohibit the parking or storage of any house car, trailer, camp trailer, trailer coach, camper, or boat on any public street or alley within the city for any longer than one hour between the hours of 2:00 a m. and 6:00 a m. Any violation of the proposed ordinance would result in a $25 00 fire The $25 fine is consistent with other city ordinances concerning the parking of vehicles It 1s significant to note that the Committee recognizes that the ordinance is somewhat restrictive However, we feel that it is important that all recreational vehicles not be permitted to park on city streets. Such parking of recreational vehicles is frequently considered to he unsightly and represents a potential safety hazard for vehicles attempting to back out if driveways RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the proposed ordinance establishing parking restrictions for recreational vehicles be approved by the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 71 (First Reading). .... 113_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUNGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PARKING RESTRICTIONS FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLES City council Agenda -7- April 4, 1979 A N, Stag brain Fet'Crdicaree ti The revised Ordinance addptfag Cmfstaye P7acs and ^..-alrjW Fees, ORDINANCE W. 75 (First Read( ng — ............................ 12D A.T ORDINANCE OF TiE CM CCORCIL CF TAE CM CF M09 , CUCAN.C7 GA. CALIFUMA, FWIIDL1G Fib TFE MMLI&DI N OF A ORAIRAGE PLA.7 AM TEE ESTAMISt9.c' 1W CF CRAMM FEF_S IR aMECI M THEREWITH. r• : ':r• --' 4. CITY WWACEi•s STAFF REPORT5 A. OecTaration of Lcoactfam - Qraffev -fat ISWtom Hf44 Scloal District The Board of Trastess regseseatfrr7 the Ch M7 beat Chia. Hfgh School District has soF "ed a revised dMiaraticm of _ impaction in order to tangly with Me of City Ordinance So. 311, The declaration of impazticm ccmtalas the following ffadfmgs as determeed ty the s=d of Trwtees, I. Overcrawdfng exists ebe to the amapticm of aorly homes creating as esmilmeat In Mess of the desig+ capacity of " sd=l. 2. Alta Lou Hfgb Schaal scc 6esf9ma to acc=mezte 16M students, Veal: Wnrallm=t for 1975 -79 etteaded 26M. 3, In attemptfag te, alleviate this problem tie District installed 20 relocataile alaSU== m the sane site. Even with these laareased facilities,aecfmum capacity is only ZIM stedmts. The 20 relocatabies should not be cammied in tine eisigm cnacfties because there are faac9iate SOMOrt facilities, causing curricular restrictit". 4, The Ofstrfct is caryectly awratfog a lO✓rn-tad day schedule at Alta Loma L 5N Sd='�l fm order to survive these asfevrt=te eco0tims, S. For the school year 1979 -M all Matt graters from the Alta Lou attendance area will attend osier district Schdols. There still Will be orrr 2MOI tenth- tLenth 922 stcdeWts cu eanpxf. Tie cr'nAfticm of impaction, as eeffmffd by 5 -251 asd Or.11 8 Rh, 30, stir exists, 6. Recent actfcn Ivy the City C=Wll to loft reslrietfoos an home building vM f3r0ker impact Alta Lace Sfgb schul, The school cold be forted fmto rm esteod -J day session far 19W -81, v/tb amly grades 1x-12 om r campus. City Council Agenda -8- April 4, 1979 ' The Chaffey Joint Union High School District has reviewed all practical and reasonable methods for mitigating over- crowded conditions Including the following: 1. Use of retocatable .structures and trailers to the extent feasible witt: District finances and site space and to conside ^ing the load an support facilities 2 Mayor realignment of all school boundaries was considered, discussed, and partially implemented. 3 Use of all local bond and state loan revenues to the extent allmmd by law. All reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding have been evaluated, some implemented, and no further feasible method for reducing such conditions exists. There are currently no classrooms used for non - instructional purposes There are currently no agreements between the Chaffey Joint Union High School District and any residential developer whereby temporary-use buildings will be leased to the school district. RECOMMENDATION: if the City Council concurs with the declaration of impaction as filed, the Council must indicate its concurrence by adopting an appropriate resolution. The next issue which must be considered is astaLllshing a fee for residential development with the Chaffey Joint Union High School District It is our understanding this issue is currently being discussed between committee members representing tha City Council and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees Until that fee has been decided, it is appropriate for the Board of Trustees to submit a schedule specifying how the fees will be used to solve problems of overcrowding The schedule must state as a minimum a The classroom facilities to be obtained b. Location of classrooms. c The times such classrooms will be available. • RESOLUTION 40. 19 -32 . ... . .. .. . . ....... ... 132 p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PJUUCHO '4 J CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING IN THE FINDINGS OF THE \� CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICr THAT CONDITIONS OF OVERCROWDING EXIST IN SAID DISTRICT 8 Report From Finance Director Reaardin�, Cost for Census......... 137 City Council Agenda -9- April 4, 1979 C Setting Fees For Subscriptions . .... . .... ....... .........139 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -31 .... ... .... . ...... ..140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCldiONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING CERTAIN FEES FOR THE ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION OF CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDAS AND /OR MINUTES. D Establishment of General Plan Amendment. Date. .. .. 141 RESOLUTION NO 79 -30 .. . ... . ...... . . .... .. . . ... 145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ESTABLISHING ANNUAL GENERAL PLAIT AMENDMENT HEARING DATES E. CitvLunty Policy for Coordination of Planntno Activities... 147 - RESOLUTION NO. 79 -29 . ... .... 152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ADOPTING CITY /COUNTY POLICY FOR COORDINATION OF WANING ACTIVITIES F Redevelopment Information. ... .... .. .. .. 156 G Request Authorization for Finance Director to Audit State Board of Authorization is requested for the City Manager, Finance Director, or any enployee designated by the City Manager to request a review of sales and use tax transactions and collc:tions for the City of Rancho Cucamonga This information is essential U in order to rake certain that the city is receiving all sales dnote that theninfotrmationhretainednbytthe StatelBoardnoficant t Equalization is confidential. Therefore, a City Council resolution designating the city representatives authorized to review the records is required. It is anticipated that the information we receive from the audit of State Board of Equalization will be used to help predict the anticipated revenues from sales and use taxes in i the current and coming fis,,al years. _ RECOMPENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No 79 -26. City Council Agenda -10- April 4. 1979 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -26 ...... . ... ...... .... ..... 161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE LITY OF RANCHO COUNTY OF USETTAXFRECORDS�NIA, . H. Request for Tenmorary Clerical Assistance ... .. . ..... .... 2 The Building Official and the Community Development Director requested t talleviateisomeoofithe backelog part-time y k work in Building Department It is anticipated that the cost for a half -time position for the remainder of the fiscal year will be because Funds Department. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Personnel De .rtnent - be authorized to recruit for ana hire a clerk typist at an salary savings insthe are avai Development Department. I Proposal Review - Baseline Project.. ... .. .... .... 166 by Llov� Hub s J Four Nay Stop at Hellman Avenue and San Bernardino Road... . 167 RESOLUTION NO 79 -27. .. . . ... . .... . .. . ...... 169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO SIGNS ON AVENUERATASANLBERNARDINOINSTALLATION OF STOP ROAD K Tract 9434: Acceptance of BonCs and Agreement by Chesron.. .170 Lons truttion. & Perfo E 32,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, MP OVEMENTSECURIT O IMPROVEMENT Y. ANDPFINALMAP OF TRACT ACT ORE9434T� I h � City Council Agenda -11- April 4, 1979 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 11 NEW BUSINESS a. Council b Audience 12 ADJOURNMENT • April 4, 1979 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL HINUTES Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City Council was held at the Community Service Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, April 4, 1979. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor James C. Frost. 2. PLEDGE TO FLAG. Mayor Frost led in the pledge to the flag. 3 ROLL CALL. Present: Council members Jon D. Mikels, Michael Palombo, PffTT p6.__fc)0ossc�, and Mayor. Jame-- C. Frost. _ Staff members • City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Interim City Attorney, Samuel Crowe; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Assistant to City Mdnager, Jim Robin;on 40 Absent: Charles A. West who was out of town on business. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: None were submitted for approval 5. ANNOUNCE11ENTS. a Mikels announced the re;ignatlon of Chester Frost from the Historical Commission Requested applications be accepted in order to rill the vacancy b. Mayor announced he was in Sacramento on Monday, April 2, to give testimony before the Revenue Taxation Committee on AB -807 regarding "bail -out" funds for newly inccrporated citics c Staff requested to add an additional item - awarding of contact for design standards for traffic signals it Archibald,Church and Baseline /Hellman 6. C0114ITTEE REPORTS. a Advisory Committee: Report by Chuck Buquet who said the .Advisory Cv nittee had been discussing ways to get Immunity input to the Committee. Said items of concern to the Committee would be coning up later on the agenda which were the storm drain and systems development fees Page 2 b. Historical Commission: Leonard Gorczyca, acting cbiirman, expressed regrets over the resignation of Chet Frost. The historical ordinance, when adopted, will enable the Commission to function officially in more than just an advisory position. They are considering an assessions system for dovations and acquistions of historical materials. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR. Hayor requested item •d" be removed for further discussion a. Approval of warrants In the amount of $117,439.77 b. Approve alcoholic beverage license for on -sale general for Boars Head, 6620 Carnelian. c. Authorization is requested for the Community Development Director to attend the American Planning Association, California Chapter, meeting' in San Diego to April 1979. Although funds were not specifically budgeted for attendance at this conference, it is recomnended that approval be granted since they are of considerab*,e value to the planning staff and help to keep the planm.19 profession updated on current concepts in municipal planning. Anticipated cost is $200.00 d. Itrm removed for discussion. e Zoning ordinance amendment No 79 -03 to set public hearing before City Coum:il on April 18, 1979 f. Zone shame no. 79 -02 to set for public hearing before City Council on April 10, 1979. 9. Tract 9131: Release cash bonds to Sagewood Hems, Inc. Cash bond - lot 8 $ 2,000.00 Cash bond - lot 7 150.00 h. Tract 9226: Release of bond for restoration of the model area to John D. Lusk and Son Bond 5 1,000.00 i Tract 9274: Release of cash staking deposit to H.J Brock b Sons, Inc. Cash staking deposit S 1,450 00 j Tract 9274: Accept roads and release bond to IU Brock b Sons, Inc. Performance bo ^d (road) $172,000.06 • k. Tract 9280: Release of bond to Bob Jensen Builder, Inc. Performance bond (landscaping) S 5,000.00 P Page 3 1 Tract 9295: Accept roads and release bond to Socalane Corp Performanre bond (road) $100,000.00 m. Tract 9302: Release of bonds to Vanguard Builders, Inc. Performance bond (sewer) S 34,000.00 Performance bond (water) $ 20,000.00 n. Tract 9305: Release of bonds to the Jones Company Performance bond (sewer) S 43,000 00 Performance bond (water) $ 50,000.00 o Tract 9313: Accept roads and release bonds to Socaland Corp. Performance bond (road) S 78,000.00 p. Tract 9314: Accept roads and release bond to )ohn D. Lusk b Son Performance bond (road) $168,000 OU q. Tract 9321: Release of cash staking deposit to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. Cash staking deposit $ 3,700 00 r. Tract 9321: Release of bond to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance bond (landscaping) $ 18,975.00 s Tract 9322: Release of cash staking deposit to Lewis Hanes of Calif. Cash staking deposit $ 3,650.00 t. Tract 9353: Release of bond to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Perfomance bond (landscaping) $ 8,728.50 u. Tract 9358: Release of cash taking deposit to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Cash staking deposit $ 1,9CJ 00 v Tract 9358: Release of bond :o Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance bond (road) $ 80,000.00 �.' w. Tract 9381 Accept roads and release bond to Lesny /Wilshire Prop y, Performance bond (road) $136,000 OG Tract 9397: Accept roads and release bond to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. ;;�, Performance band (road) S 82,000.00 Page 4 Y. Tract 9447: Release of bonds to Walton Construction Corp. • Labor & iaterial (sewer) $ 6,500.00 Labor & Material (water) $ 91500.00 z Tract 9450: Release of bond to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. Performance bond (landscaping) $ 5,225 00 as Tract 9484: Accept roads and release bond to David W. Long. Performance bond (road) $ 42,000 00 bb. Tract 9569: Accept roads and release bond to Don Lee Construction Performance bond (road) $134,000.00 cc Tract 9616: Release of cash staking deposit to M.J Brock & Sons. Cash staking deposit $ 3,050 00 dd Refer insurance claim by R.J. Siever & Co for Lydia Mosqueda to the City Attorney for handling Motion: Moved by Patombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Consent • Calendar lotion carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Valombo, Frost ABSENT: West. NOES: None. Item "d_'_ tram Consent Calendar. Acceptance of gift from Theta Cable, Inc. Wasserman said Ontario, Upland, and Montclair all have franchise cable T V. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not yet franchised Theta Cable has indicates that becav:e of incorporation we would adopt the County's 2% franchise fee They are paying the other cities 5% Theta felt that they should nay Rancho Cucamonga the same amount which is 5: of their gross receipts This does not grant them any exclusive rights to franchise There are four other companies operating in the city and this would not give them any advantage over the other companies -- this is a gift only. totion Moved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to accept the gift from Theta Cable, Inc. Motion carried by following vote: AYES Schlosser, Mikels. Palumbo, Frost ABSENT West I40ES Clone 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8A. Sian ordinance before Council for second reading Jack Lam presented staff report. There being no discussion, the fo'.lowing motion was made: Lotion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palonbo to approve Ordinance No. 65 and waive entire reading Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Ilikels, Palombo, Frost. ABSENT: West. NOES: None Title and number read by Wasserman. 6 • Page 5 ORDINANCE NO. 65 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN ORDINANCE AND REPEALING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE PERTAINING TO SIGN REGULATION ordinance r Council for second readin Ordinance sets up the frame work for the establishment of the Histor cal Commission fir. Holley presented the staff report. There being no discussion, the following motion was made Motion Moved by Schlosser, seconded by MiKels to approve Ordinance No 70 and to waive entire reading Carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palonbo, Frost ABSENT: West. NOES: None Title _ and number read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE NO 70 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE • CITY OF 'ANCHO CUCANON,A, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COICIISSIOH TO ACT IN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO CITY COUNCIL III THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS, EVENTS, STRUCTURES AND SITES AND TO IDENTIFY PERSONS OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE TO THE CIT1 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BL An ordinance for the establishment _of systems development fees before Council for second reading. Report presented by Fir Wasserman Mayor asked that since input was still caning in regarding these fees, would Council prefer holding off further consideration of adoption until Councilman West returned) Schlosser said that since he had a large pioJect into the city, he would prefer stepping aside so there would not be any conflict of interest on his Part Councilman Schlosser vacated his seat Com±ents were expressed by Ken Hillis of the BIA regarding the amount of fees Jeff Scerenka, membe• of the Chamber of Commerce industrial Committee, stated the c:nnittee had adopted a motion to request Council to continue second reading and not adopt the ordinance until they could cone back with some input. Mikels stated that a suggestion had come to combine the beautification fee with the systems development fee, therefore, he felt this had some merit and should be studied. Page 6 Potion: Roved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to continue item to the April 15 meeting for second reading Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palumbo, Frost. ABSENT: Nest and Schlosser NOES: None. 8H. Storm drain fge ardinarce before Council for first reading. Item had been removed from sequence on the agenda by Council in order to handle the storm drain and systems development ordinances together Staff report was presented by Lloyd Hubbs who stated the ordinance had been changed significantly from the original one which had previously been submitted because of input from the Council and others Changes were summarized Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordinance No. 61, set April 18 for second reading and waive entire reading Motion carried by following vote: AYES Mikels, Palombo, Frost. ABSENT: Hest and Schlosser NOES: None Title and number read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE NO 61 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA!MNGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE ON NEW DEVELOPMENT. (Councilman Schlosser returned to his seat at the Council table). . JM. At the larch 2l Council meeting, start naa Deen alrectea d an amendment to the school ordinance to include language from ch would allow the dedication of land in lieu of payment of fees. Motion: loved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to approve Ordirance No 74, set April 18 for second reading, and waive entire reading lotion carried by following vote AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Frost ABSENT: west. NOES None Title and number read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE NO 74 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDMWICE NO 30, WHICH PERTAINS TO THE FINANCING OF INTERIM SCHOOL FACILITIES, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE DEDICATION OF LAND IN LIEU OF FEES report stating this had been previously requested by Council Mikels stated he had been contacted regarding the problem of four by fouring • and the length of tine getting final approval for a parcel map and asked Mr. Lam what was the approximate time involved in the procedure Lan said it takes about 45 to 60 days for tentative approval of a parcel map or whenever the applicant's engineer completes the plan checks for public Page 7 •improvements not Fir.al approval can vary Lam said that is why four by an fourin9 is Schlosser stated he due mobile �eparks, ai sand condominiums tobeexcludefrom tha inance Lain said t could be included in another ordinance. Motion Moved by Palumbo, seconded Mikels to Schlosser, and waive entire reading ABSENT Hest NOES: None. Title and number Mikels, Palonbo, Frost. read by Wassercran ORDINANCE NO 73 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 64 TO EXEMPT PARCEL MAPS WHERE ONLY ONE (1) NEW DWELLING UNIT CAN RESULT FROM THE AND DECLARING NG ESTABLISHED By THEREOF NO 64, off- n dt an r gardtng regulatie problems, the ordinance had been removed from the March 22 agenda an was now before council for consideraticn osser seilApri1M18eforyscccidbrbading�dandbwaivNe entiretreadtFros Motion ABSENTrriWest. NOES: None. vote: Title andAYES. numberlreadrbyMikels, Wassermaniambo, ORDINANCE NO 72 Ali ORIDI�JANCE OF THE COUNCI OF THE C OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CITY REPS LING SECTION 61 024A (b)(3), AiENDING SECTION 61 022, AND ADDING SECTION 61 0219 (a)(9) FOR THESREGULATIONlOF HOMEE OCCUPATIONSR04IOE COUNTY CODE TO ov. . _..._..'_ ,CgStQ�.Ilotal reh ties en city tree s. q Chairman of the the Council by the Advisory Corn Chuck Bu uet, Cucamonga Subcommittee of the Advisory Commute, but itnwas felt it Mr. Buquet stated the ordinance was restrictive, y to eliminate parking important for the benefit of the communit of recreational vehicles on the city streets for extended periods of time Problems would be handled on a complaint basis Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Mikels to approve Ordinance Motion 71, set April 18 for second reading, and waive entire reading. , Frost. ABSENT: West. NOES: NonevotTitle and number sreadMbye Wasserman bo, Page 8 ORDINANCE r.O. 71 Ail ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C4YY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHIM PARKING RESTRICTIM FOR RECREATIMAL IERICIES. (Council directed staff to work closely with the Sheriff's Degartnest A9 fmwre this would be handled an a complaint basis only.) 9. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF WORTS. 9A. Declaration of Impaction by the Chaffey Joint Won Rfcfm Scfa„ Distr1M, Hr. Wasserman summarized the revised decTaratfam of fnpactfam snhmittei ty the high school district ohIch foTlows: 1 Overcrowding exists due to the occupation of newly tsonste homes creating an enrollment in excess of the design apWity cf the school. 2. Alta Loma High School was designed to accoxwndste 7600 stodarts. Peak enrollment for 1978 -79 exceeded 2600. 3. In attempting to aTTevfate this problem the District installed 20 relocatable classrooms on the same site. Evem with the a tma:azse'J facilities maximum capacity is only 2100 studentr.. The 20 relacatables: should not to counted in the design capacities beemne there are inadequate support facilities causing currfcolar restrictic s. 4. The District is currently operatin. -• a TO -p"Iat dby scba*.ie at Alta Loma High School in order to smvfve Buse arfcrtanate cam - ditions 5 For the school year 197g -80 all ninth graders frran the Alta Came attendance area will attend other dfstrfct schools. There still will be over 2000 tenth - twelfth grade students an campus. The -- ' tioa of impaction, as defined by SB -201 and Ordinance 30, still exists. 6. Recent action by the City Council to lift restrfctfors as bane building will further impact Alta Lana Hfgh School. The scAcal mold be forced into an extended day session for 1980.81 %ith only gm6es 10 -12 on campus. The Chaffey Joint Union High School Ofstrfet has revfered all practical and reasonable methods far mitigating ovescrawded camlitfais. laslodimg the following: 1 Use of relocatable structures and trailers to the eaten feasible with District finances and site space and In considering the load am support facilities. 2. Major realignment of aTT school boundaries was considered, dis- L: -A Page 9 cussed, and partially implemented 3. Usc of all local bond and state loan revenues to the extent allowed by law. All reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding have been evaluated, some implemented, and no further feasible method for reducing such conditions exists. There are currently no classrooms used for non - instructional purposes There are currently no agreements between the Chaffey Joint Union High School District and any residential developer whereby temporary - use buildings will be leased to the school district. Notion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to accept the Impaction Statement by the Chaffey Joint Union High School District by approving Resolution No. 79 -32 ane waive entire reading lotion carried by following vote. AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Frost. ABSENT: Hest HOES: None: Title and number read by Wasserman RESOLUTION NO 79 -32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING 111 THE FINDINGS OF THE CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT CONDITIONS OF OVERCROWDING EXIST IN SAID DISTRICT. Motion: Moved by Mayor Frost, seconded by Palombo to abolish the existing subcommittee of two which had been formed dt the last •council meeting and to establish a type of fact finding committee to sit down with the school district to came up with a determination of an appropriate fee Mikels concurred but stated the committee should be represented by each teacher organization and be ac broad as possible to be nana9eebie.'jte� Motion Original motion by Frost, seconded by Palombo to abolish the existing subcommittee was unanimously carried by Schlossc- Mikels, Palombo, Frost. ABSENT: West. Mayor appointed Mikels and Palombo,and anyone else who would like to attend, as representatives. Council directed staff to contact by letter as many teacher groups as possible Also, members of the former Fact Finding Committee and School Task Force be contactP..d. "L Censt by 114114"Y av Emoev. Director of Finanrp. Mr Empey reported the crus st of remor conducting the census was considerably higher than anticipated. Reason for this was the State Department of Finance had not fully realized the size of the community and nrvnber of dwelling units involved The numbar of census takers required has almost doubled Mr. Fmpey emphasized Page 10 the estimates before council were made by staff which consisted mostly of salaries Motion: Moved by Palombo I seconded by Mikels to appropriate the remaining portion of the reserve for contingency in the amount of $20,000 for the purpose of conducting the census. Motion carried by Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Frost. ABSENT: Hest. Wasserman said this was a policy procedure being submitted to Council for consideration which would establish fees for those requesting mailed copies of agendas and minutes of council and planning commission meetings. Motion: (loved by Schlosser, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No 79 -31 which sets subscription fees for agendas end minutes and to wawa entire reading Motion carried by the following vote AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Frost. ABSENT: Nest. Wasserman read title and number.— RESOLVI0N NO 79 -31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING CERTAIN FEES FOR THE ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION OF CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDAS AND /OR MINUTES 9D. Establishment of General Plan amendment date. Report by Jack Lam who outlined three alternatives to the council The recommendation of the Planning Commission was to establish two general plar. amendment dates and hold the third general plan amendment hearing for city purposes. The recc mendation to council was presented by the Planning Cmmission's Resolution No 79 -27 with the first date established for the second meeting of the Planning Commission in June and the second meeting to be held at the second meeting of the Planning Commission in September 1979. Itotion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Mikels to approve the Planning Commission's recommendation, approve Resolution No 79 -30, and waive entire reading. Potion carried by the following vote AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Frost. ABSENT: Hest Title and number read by Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO 79 -30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNIONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANTRAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT HEARING DATES. — 0 - 0 6 0 Page 11 9F. City- County policv_fnr coordination of planning activities. Report was presented by Jack Lair. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve Resolution No 79 -29 and waive entire redding. Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Frost ABSENT west Number and title read by Wasserman RESOLUTION NO 79 -29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CITY- COUNTY POLICY FOR COORDINATION OF PLANNING ACTIVITIES dr An oral report by Lauren Yasserman regarding Reoevr' n After his report, Mr. Wasserman announced that beginning April 15 for about _ seven weeks, an individual had been assigned to the city from the CORO Foundation He had expressed an interest in looking into availablility of Post Proposition 13 funding which would include redevelopment. Action: Council received and filed report. State Board of Equil iza tian sales tax records. Authorization needed to be to the form of a resolution. Infanna lion is essential to order to make certain the city is receiving all sales and use tax revenues to which it is entitled Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No 79 -26 and waive entire reading Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels Palombo, Frost. ABSENT: West. Title and number read by Wasserman RESOLUTION NO 79 -26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF SALES AND USE TAX RECORDS Department for the remainder of the fiscal year at a salary of W r, per hour Funds are available in the salary account of the department because of recent resignations Motion: Noved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to approve temporary clerical help at a salary of $3 81 per hour Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Frost. ABSENT: West. Page 12 9T. BaseLJU project proposal review. Mr Hubbs gave the staff report. He stated proposals had been solicited for the reconstruction of Baseline east of Vineyard to Hellman an: east of Archibald to Ramona. Associated Engineers was the low bidder at 516,200 It was recommended to award contract to Associated Engineers Motion: Coved by Mikel:•, seconded by PalomDo to concur with staff's recommendation to approve the preparation of agreements for design services with Associated Engineers at a cost of $16,200 Motion carried by the following vote AYES: Schlosser, hikels, Palombo, Frost. ABSENT: Hest 9J Four-way stop at Hellman and San Bernardino Road. Paul Rougeau, Assoc. Ei on hand to answer questions. The traf c Comm ttee on March 13 recormended a 4 -way stop be installed at this intersection. Concurrence of council with the adoption of a resolution was necessary lintion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mlkels to accept the recommendations of the traffic committee to install a 4 -way stop at Hellman and San Bernardino Roais, approve Resolution No 7e -27, and waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYCS: Schlosser, Nikels, Palombo, Frost. ABSENT: Hest. Title and number read by Wasserman. RESOLUTION IIO. 79 -27 A RESOLUTION OF THE C1 7Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. RELATIVE TO THE INSTALLATIO'l OF STOP SIGNS AT HELLMAN AVENUE AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD 9K. Tract 9434: Accertance of bonds and agraenent by Chevron Construction: Faithful performance (road) S 64,000.00 Labor and material (road) $ 32,0010 00 Motion Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Ilikeic to approve Resolution No 79 -28 and waive entire reading tiocion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Frost. ABSENT: West. Title and number read by Wasserman. RESOLUTICN NU 79.23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CI*r1 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMJNCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL 11AP OF TRACT NO 9434 40 0 3' Page 13 ,91, Added item_ -- Approval U enter into agreement for design services ^ for signals at Baseline and Hillman and Archibald and Church Street. Mohle, Perry d Associates was the low bidder at $3,400 Notion: Moved by Palombo, .e••onded by Mikels to approve the preparation of a contract agreement with Ilohle, Perry d Associates to perform design stan4ards for traffic signals at a cost of 53,400 Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palonbo, Frost ABSENT: Hest. 10 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. Mr Crowe had nothing to report 11 NEW BUSINESS. a. A Proclamation for the Welt End Boys Club was read by the Mayor. Council authorized mayor to s•gn the proclamation b. Question came up as to how did Caltrans get to remove a strip of tr ^es. Council asked for a report back on this and to look into a procedure to see that these are replaced c Mwyellen Hill, Associated Chaffey Teachers, read a motion wbieb vas pas!,ed by the Associated Chaffey Teachers Board of Directors on March 6, 1979 and by the Associated Chaffey Teachers Representative Council on March 13, 1973 by a majority vote as follows: "Bill Pitts moved and Maryellen Hill seconded that the Board of Directors recommend to Rep Council that ACT take a position of being opposed to any partial lifting of the moratorium on con- struction ir. Ranch -r Cucamonga. Further, that if the Rancho Cucamonga City Council approves the lifting of any part or all of the moratorium that ACT support the position that the issue be submitted to the voters as a referendum. Motion carried " Alma Polk, Associated Chaffey Teachers requested to be placea on the next City Council agenda (address: 1027 W LaDeney, Ontario) Others addressing Council regarding the moritorium- school overcrowding issue were Bill Pitts, Associated Chaffey Teachers Ray Sarrio, Chaffey Joint Union High School District Trustee member Dave Von raenel, 7201 Marine Avenue, 91701, local teacher Ken Willis, BIA Sandy Orley, Alta Loma Elementary School District Site Council member Russ Btuett, Developer Larry Bliss, Hone d Associates r� 6..A k pale 14 12. MAtioo u nnanimouslycarried. ba bµeetingbadjourned at 105 5ipsm r to adjourn Beverly Authelet Deputy City clerk 0 • w April 18, 1979 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER. The regular meeting of the City Council was held at the Community Service Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cuamonga, on Wednesday, April 18, 1979 The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. by Mayor James C. Frost 2. PLEDGE TO FLAG. Mayor Frost led in the pledge to the flag _ 3. ROLL CALL. Present: Council members Jon D. Mikels, Michael Palombo, Charles .. end Mayor James C. Frost. Staff member,: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Interim City Attorney, Sam Crowe; Ccmmunity Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Assistant to City Ndnager, Jim Robinson. Absent: Phillip D. Schlosser 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: None were submitted for approval 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS a Mikels presented a SLAG report summarizing the following egion -wide activities: �l{gkvud L lay{ M�l.rto 1. Adoption of the 208 -}ut. rP—pUn and certification of final EIR. 2. Adoption of 1980 Region Transportation Improvement Plan 3 Grant approvals which involved protions of Rancho Cucamonga b Advisory Committee meeting at 6 30 p m. on April 19 in the Library Conference Room. C. Historical Commission: Mikels stated an appointment could be madp to the Historical Commission at the next City Council meeting on May 2 d. Hest Valley Transit meeting on April 19 at the Montclair City Hall. ■ ti Page 2 e. Planning Commission study session at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall Conference- • Room on April 26 at 4:30 p.m. f. Special census is now underway. g. AB -807, the Bill to provide some changes in the Proposition 13 "bail- out" funds will be before the Nays and Means Committee on April 26 Mayor Frost wi`l be going to give testimony h Monday evening, April 16, the Mayor present =d to the Chaffey Board of Trustee's meeting a Council recommendation for the formation of a "special" committee on which two councilmen had been appointed and asked the Board to appoint two representatives to serve also to discuss (1) A determination of what fees would be necessary to provide sclutions of overcrowding. (2) Discuss long -range impact of various proposals and alternatives and to work toward a permanent solution. _ i Introduction of RAy Reyburn, the new principal of Alta Loma High School. 6. COPNITTEE REPORTS. a Advisory Committee Chuck Buquat, Chairman of the Cucamonga Subcommittee, had nothing to report since the Advisory Committee would be meeting the next evening. b Historical Commission. Leonard Oorc:vca, acting chairman. said the Commission was waiting for the ordinance to go into effect, then they would tecome a legal body and could then begin to accept gifts and donations. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR. a. Approval of warrants in the amount of $405,708.76 b Refer claim against the city for $2,000 by F A. Marques to City Attorney for handling c Refer claim against the city for $790 by Kenneth Salser and Kenny Frank to the City Attorney for handling d Approve alcoholic beverage license for off -sale general for Ernest Friedman and Helen Rothbart (the Spirit Shop pe) at 8760 Baseline, Rancho Cucamonga, 91701. '• e. Tract 9398: Accept roads and release bond to Construtech Co • <t Performance bond (road) $44,000 cs,!„ f. Tract 9586: Accept roads and release bond to Lewis Homes of California. Performance bond (road) $168,000 ,. Y a Page 3 g Tract 9587: Accept roads and release bond to Lewis Homes of Calif Performance bond (road) $ 78,000 h Zone change 79 -01 - Alta Loma Properties To set public hearing for May 2, 1979. 1 Zone change 79 -03 - Vanir Envelopment To set May 2, 1979 for public hearing Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to approve the consent calendar lotion rciried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palonbo, West, Frost ABSENT. Schlosser 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS. aA. Storm drain fee ordinance before Council for second reading which establishes a per acre storm drain fee for the construction of master planned storm drain facilities throughout the city The fee is to be required as a condition of building permit issuance Report presented by Lloyd Hubbs Those addressing tht- Council were: Jeff Sceranka, member of the Industrial Committee of the Chamber of Commerce, stated the Chamber oesired to see a "sunset" clause added to the ordinance Ken Willis, BIA, stated the BIA took no position against this particular ordinance but stressed that the Council consider the accumulation impact of all fees on development Henry Reiter, a local developer, spoke in favor of the need for the fees Motion: Moved by palambo, seconded by Mikels to adopt Ordinance No 75 and waive entire reading Motion carried hy the following vote: AYES: Ilikels, oalombo, West, Frost. ABSENT: Schlosser ORDINANCE NO. 75 All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNKINGA, CALIFOMIA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABL;SHMENT OF A DRAINAGE PLAN AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF DRAINAGE FEES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH neve,00menc Tee zo proviae a preaictaoie ano equitable source o• tunaing to relieve serious traffic and roadway deficiencies throughout the city. The fee to be established at one percent on the building permit valuation Report presented by Lloyd Hubbs t r• .�r. Page 4 Nest stated that new construction should not have to support all improvements within the city -- that other methods of financing should be made to tax the people who ,_� . already lived in the community. Motinr: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordinance No. 61 and Resolution RHO. 9 -10, +611th establishes the fees, and tQ waive entire readings of both Motion ,carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, West, Frost. ABSENT: Schlosser 'J3tles and numbers read by Wasserman. ORDINXICE NO. 61 All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE ON NEW DEVELOPMENT. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE IN ACCORDA14CE WITH _ ORDINANCE NO 61 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. fees Hayor a, :ed about the possibility of setting a "sunset" clause on orainance nO5 61 and 75. Wasserman suggested this be handled though a minute action to instruct • staff to bring back to Council Crowe suggested eliminating the second paragraph which states: "Whereas, the City Council recognized the need to further review the status and the equitability of said fees " Mayor read the resolution in full Potion: Moved by West, seconded by Palumbo to approve Resolution No 79 -37 with corrections as made by the City Attorney to delete the second paragraph Carried by the following vote AYES Mikels, Palombo, West, Frost. ABSENT: Schlosser RESOLUTION NO. 79 -37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING REVIEW OF ORDINANCES 61 AND 75 crm Pararng or recreational venues on city streets In s wouia a nmlnate the parKing or storing of any house car, trailer, tamper, coach, or boat on any city street overnight and setting a fine of $25 00 for violations Bill Holley, Community Services Director, presented the staff report • y. 0 Page 5 Motion: loved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adopt Ordinance No 71 and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Nest, Frost. ABSENT: Schlosser. Title and number read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE NO 71 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PARKING RESTRICTIONS FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. BE. An ordinance before Council for second readin amend in the zonin ordinance regarding regulations o one ccupat ons. to report by Jack Lam. lotion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikels to adopt Ordinance No 71 and waive entire reading Tlotion carried by following vote: AYES: - Mikels, Palombo, West, Frost ABSENT: Schlosser. Title and number read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE NO. 72 • All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA REPEALING SECTION 61 024A(b)(3), AMENDING SECTION 61.022, A14D ADDING SECTION 61.0219(a)(9) OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE REGULATION OF HO4E OCCUPATIONS. lieu of fees Report by Wasserman. Motion Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adopt Ordinance No. 74 and waive entire reading. lotion carried by the following vote: AYES: tiikels, Palombo, Nest, Frost. ABSENT: Schlosser Title and number read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE NO. 74 All ORD01ANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 30, WHICH PERTAINS TO THE FINANCING OF INTERIM SCHOOL FACILITIES, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE DEDICATION OF LAUD IN LIEU ® OF FEES. r, Page 6 infortnation.� Wasserman presented the stair report stating the ordinance' establishes eligibility fat, specific city employees to obtafry State criminal history information. For certain types of city posftidns, to is essential that the city be able to run routine types of chocks. IM Order to do so, it is essential to have Ordinan.e No. 66 adopted! by Council. Mikels stated that staff should come to Council first for such,appra"% Also the ordinance should spell out the scope and authority being granters in the ordinance. Motion Moved by Palombo, sacnnded by West to approve Ordlnanre Na: 60, set May 2 for second reading and waive entire reading. Mottom carded! by the following vote, AYES: Palombo, West, Frost,. and Mikeis• (wfttn qualifications as previously stated). AJSL21T: Schlosser. Title anm number read by Wasserman ORDINANCE NO. 66 All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA,. PROVIDING FOR' THE INELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN PERSONS FOR E14PLOY14DIT BY THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING CERTAAF OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES ACCESS TO THE 'STATE SUtfMARY CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATIONr ordirance before Council for it d T f P' S xrtl possess ono .'eapons. Mr Nasserman presented the staff report Bill Houtz of Houtz and Sons asked if all activity using fire arms was to be stopped. There were times when he might use a shotgum to' protect his chickens Mr Crowe stated the ordinance could' not be usra in cases where an individual was protecting life o.- property, Mlkefs:aske who made that determination as to whether a person was protecting life and /or property Crowe stated t`.e police officer; after, that the caurts. Motion: Roved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Jrdinarrw Nm. 60, set flay 2 for second reading, and to waive entire readfng_ Potfom carrfa by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Pa!ombo, West. Frost- ABSENT: S�:hTdsser. Title and number read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE NO. 60 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, PEGULATInG THE USE AND POSSESSION OF WEAPONS r;ND REPEALING SECTIONS 22 011 THROUGH 2c O:N OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE_ El E.J 0 Page 7 by Jack Lao who stated the amendment added three words in order to ,clarify alternative grounding methods to be "in dwelling units" and mot in places of employment. 'notion: Moved by Miikels, seconded by Nest to set May 2 for second reading and waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Nest, Frost. ABSENT: Schlosser. Title and number read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE 140. 59 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFOICIIA, AIENDING ORDINANCE ND 59 RELATING TO ELECTRICAL. REGULATIONS. and zones n o er to c can up inconsistencies in the zone code an to implement established policies in accordance with the General Plan. Staff . report by Jack Lam. Motion: Loved by Palombo. seconded by West to set Hay 16 for second reading and waive entire reading lotion carried by the following vote: AYES Palombo. West, Frost. ABSENT: Schlosser. ABSTAINED: Mikels. Title and number read by Wasserman ORDINANCE NO. 76 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1103GA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING, UPEALING AND ADDING CERTAIN SENIORS OF THE R -3 AMID A -P ZONE DISTRICTS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE AS ADOPTED BY REFERENCE THAT PERTAIN TO PYRAMIDAL ZONING AND OFFICE COMPLEXES. parcels located north side of Foothill, west of San Diego Avenue This would eliminate the possibility of incompatible uses and bring zoning into conformance with the General Plan which designates area as mixed use. Staff report by Jack Lam. Iotiun: loved by Palombo, seconded by Nest to set .4y 2 for second reading and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: .AYES- Palombo, West, Frost. ABSENT: Schlosser ABSTAINED: Ilikels. Title and number read by Wasserman Page 8 OROINANCE NO. 77 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 207 - 101 -32 AND 33 FROM C -2 TO A -P LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD HEST OF SAN DIEGO AVENUE 9. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS 9A. Associated Chaffev Teachers Association. An oral presentation was made by Alma Polk of the Associated Chaffey Teachers (ACT). She introduced Maryellen Hill who made a report on the overcrowded situation at Alta Loma High School Alma Polk then read the following statement: "Associated Chaffey Teachers (A C.T.) insists that the Rancho - Cucamonga City Council make a decision innediatel concerning the solution of problems of overcrowded sc 061 i s. Overcrowded schools result in the deterioration of quality education. No satisfactory solution to the lack of school space for students has yet. been found. Future building will compound the present overcrowding problem. Unless the City Council commits itself to a means of solving impaction or commits itself to placing the moratorium issue on the ballot in the next election A.C.T. will take this issue to the people A.0 T is committed to defending the quality of education wherever it is threatened." 98. Cucamonqa Creek bridge betterments and Ooer Creek design standards. Report by Lloyd 80005 Mayor asked if this had been reviewed by the Advisory Committee Mr. Hubbs said no Council concurred to send item to the Advisory Committee for review Heitman ano nrcnloald /Lnurcn. nepurc uy Ltuyu nuuua. �uwu.., approved the preparation of the agreement at the April 4 meetinrr Motion Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to authorize the mayor to sign said agreements. Notion carried by following vote: AYES: Mikels, • Palombo, Hest, Frost. ABSENT* Schlosser 0 Page 9 5an Bernardino for operation of neighborhood Services and senior citizen's nutrition program at the Cucamonga Neighborhood Facility. Report by Bill Holley, Director of Community Services. Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by West to authorize Dill Holley to sign said contracts Motion carried by following vote. AYES: Mikels, Palumbo, West, Frost. ABSENT: Schlosser. 9E. State litter control grant Mr Holley requested authorization to solicit bius and awa contracts for the purchase of items and services covered in the State Little Control grant. City had been awarded $10,590. Proposed expenditures for the following which does not include salaries or operating expenses: a Toro sandpro power rake (1 ea) $4,500 b. Hixson yard vacuum sweeper (2 ea) $1,000 c Backpack -type blower (2 ea) S 700 d Litter receptacles and holders $1,200 e. Signing (fabricating d installation) $3,190 Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to authorize Ilr. Holley to seek bids and award contracts as stated for items for the State Litter Control Grant lotion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, West, Frost ABSENT: Schlosser 9F. Lion Park Community Service Center. Mr Holley requested authorization is solicit bids�s:ruc a Lion Park Community Service Center. Motion; Moved by West, seconded by Mikels to authorize Mr. Holley to solicit such bids Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, West, Frost ABSENT: Schlosser. 9G -H. Request authorization to sign final maps of tentative parcel naos 4767 and 4749 Report by Lloyd Hobbs Notion: Moved by West, second by Palombo to approve Resolution Nos. 79 -33 and 34 and to waive entire readings Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, West, Frost. ABSENT: Schlosser. Titles and numbers read by Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO 79 -33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PARCEL MAP t1UMBER 4767, Page 10 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NUMBER 4749. 9I. Acceptance of bonds and a reenents for tract 9472 The tract cans Sts o acres an gts ocated on the north side of 19th Street, rest of Haven Avenue. The developer is Boulevard Development. Faithful bond �(rea (road) d) $115,500 Motion: Moved by Hest, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. 79 -35 and waive entire readings Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palumbo, Hest, Frost. ABSENT: Schlosser. Title and .lumber read by Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING I1IPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPP.OVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9472. 9J Reauest authorizatipn to sign final map of tentative parcel m Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No 79 -36 and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, West, Frost ABSENT: Srhlosser Title and number read by Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUFBER 4744 (TENTATIVE MAP NO. 4744) 0 0 9 Page 11 10. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS Mr Crowe stated he had placed a meow before each Councilman and that he had nothing further to report. 11. NEW BUSINESS a Council (1) Mtkels suggested all ordinances be presented to Council in draft forTn two weeks prior to first reading. Council concurred this was not necessary -- that present procedure was adequate (2) Mtkels requested all ordinances be presented at second reading with all changes shown by leaving the original form and crossing out _ or inserting changes Staff said they would comply as soon as possible. (3) Council discussed the formation and purpose of the Committee that would be meeting with the Chaffey High School Board of Trustees. Fu,pose of meetings would be: - - - -Of immediate nature would be to provide some recommendations as to what fees to establish to adequately serve students from the 556 homes currently approved to start tuilding. - - -- longer range to study growth management alternatives. It was decided to keep the membership of the cmotttee to two councilmen and two board members. Wasserman would to the staff representative at these meetings. First meeting would be Monday. April 23 at the Alta Loma High Schcnl at 7 00 p.m. Later meetings would be determined by the committee which would set times. Potion: Moved by Mtkels, seconded by Palumbo to appoint Mayor as moderator of this committee Mutton carried by the following vote: AYES: Flikels, Palomeo, West, Frost ABSENT: Schlosser. Page 12 b. Audience. east Wilma Brenner south ofp8theStreetprequesting the zone he area changed to coamercial. Item was referred back to staff for investigation. 12. AJOURNMENT Motion: rried. Meeting adjourned at 10:0511pk®lstoo aalegalnsessiononot totmausly reconvene. _• Beverly Authelet • Deputy City Clerk 0 '' � gu,✓ A�AV ' ` W'.e' C� MtS AGENDA • `____ "" 0, 4 0% CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA y OA� 'f✓U¢ /�� /S Qetli*4 Regular Meeting May 16, 1979 AGENDA ITEMS -- NOTE: All Stems submitted for too City Council agsnda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting Atoms is 5+00 p.m. on the Thursday prior to the first and thix: Wodnasday of each month. The /•� City Clerk's office receives all such items. �►rl 1. CALL 70 ORDER. Till A. PLEDGE T9 FLAG. B ROLL CALL: Mikels_, Palombo , Schlosser_, Frost_ C. APPOINTMENT AND OATH OF OFFICE: Arthur H. Bridge D. APPROVAL OF MINJTEt April 4, 1979 and April 18, 1979. A/ 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS $uDb¢f AIE!nN to S % t,•n 3. COMMITTEE REPORTS p2l.d4mtNnJeof- '2c.�o2+i -`'�D l.v -- x�w. [� i► a. Advisory Committee eal. b. Historical Commission © be 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: %IAS ta+ t;.'th Dr APO O IAkgz W,* -homt ASS O j. w rho following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and N non- rontrovorsial. Thoy will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council member, staff member, or Interested party may require that an item be romeved fromA�l the .%so 0' 64- Cor.vcnt Ca.ondar for later discussion %tea Vifinec� Wah„{�GG to'JO /�1P �%if a. Appror,.1 of Warrants in the amount of E782,230 35 - Register No 79- 5- i6..t• b. Request authorization for City Manager to attend Program ... ..... ........10 Committee meeting at Airport Marina Hotel, 1380 Bayshore, — Burlingame, California, on Thursday, May 24. 1979 Purpose of meeting is to develop future conferences C. Request part -time clerical help to do typing in Administration at an hourly rate of 54.81 Funds will come from salary savings from existing vacant position. City Council Agenda -2- may 16. 1979 d. implementation of Model Home Directional Signal Program. It is recommended that the criteria to be established for the land ocity Comniss on ereview 9a reconmendation toe the Council• for This unique program was discussed during the hearings on the implemented, the Sign Ordinance. It is anticipateo that when of illegal signs advertising program will result in the elimination the various housing tracts in the City. Authorization of "Accession' system for the acceptance of ..... .. 12 e Historical items by the City of Ranc1%o Cucamonga. f. Tract 9169: Accept rows and release bond to dark III.... ........ 13 Homes, Inc. Performance Bond (Road) $154,000 Tract 9286: roads and release band to G.S R. . .. ...... .. 15 g Development (Road) $ 26,000 Performance Bond h, Tract 9348 Accept roads and release bond to Kaufman anJ .. .......18 Broad Humes, Inc. 704,000 Performance Bond (Road) $ i Tract 9350: Accept roads and release band to The Yellow .. .. .. 20 _ Brick Road Building Co any Performance Bond (Road) S 66,000 Performance Bond J. Tract 9355: Accept roads and release bond to R. L., . . .. .. 22 Sievers 8 Sons, Inc. (Road) $106,000 Performance Bond k. Tract 9317: Accept roads and release bonds to fob Jensen ,,, 25 Builder, Inc. Performance Bond (Sewer -On site) $44,000 Perfornwnte Bond (Sewer -Off site) 514,000 Pei ((Road)) $152,000 Performance Bond I City Council Agenda -3- May 16, 1979 5, PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. An Ordinance aa�ndtn SectlanMh ch Tn Pertaansetoot e0 as nanctn ame Ore b Ord nance No. p rater m sC 00 eC t es, to on ocreane e s eUe ieereor. aa_ Provide . a .... 28 ORDINANCE N0. 69A (SECON�EBING)....................... AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. AMENDING SECTION 8 OF ORDINANCE N0. CI NINS 10 THE OF MENDED SCHORDINANCE NO. S69, WHICREASETFEES THEREUNDER. pG TO PROVIDE FOR THE DEDICATION OF LAND IN LIEU THEREOF. B, An Ordinance andin Section 4 of Ordinance He. 70 Creatin an stor c mereservat on rtm ss on . •.••. 30 ORDINANCE No. 70A (SECUND READING)..... . .. .. ••.•....• • AN ORDIN ACE OF THINGISEC IONC4LOFFORDINANCE NO R70. CR NG�. TO THETCITY COUICILAINOTHE COMMIS IDEIITIFICA71011 AND VPRESER PRESERVATION AND TO /OENTIFYRYE LLO00OFTHISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE ITo THE SCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. //►�� C An Ordinance Amendin n and Ad certain Sections V o t e - an one D str C o t e an Bernar no e as A o to Re erence t at erta n to Yram a and cU__ .. .. .. 31 ORDINANCE N0. 76 (SECONDING) F AN CALIFORNIA. AMENDINGCI EPEALINGLAND ADDINGTCERTAINISECTIONSMOFG' THE R -3 AND AP ZONE DISTRICTS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNT" CODE AS ADOPTED E BYREFERENCE THAT PERTAIN to PYRAMIDAL ZOHIN- D M.i 0rp city Council Agenda -4- May 16, 1979 D. An Ordinance Requ tin the Storage Use and Sale of Safe an one rW s a t n t e 6 tv of ant o ucamonga. Last year, the Foothill Fire District utilized guidelines of their governin3 board for coptrol and, fortunately, attained coeperation of the organizations engaged in the sales. The proposed ordinance will provide recosaarynenfomemeot and penalty capabilities which were-Aadkigg-ftastgvear The City of Rancho Cucamonga is concerned with malotaining construction, zoning, and electrical standards, which have also been Incorporated into the ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Building and Safety Division and the Foothill Fire Protection District that the proposed fireworks ordinance be approved by the City Council. ORDINANCE N0. 78 SECOND READING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DNiLHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGULATING THE STCRASE, USE, AND SALE OF SAFE AHD SAiIE FIREWORKS WI.41IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM04GA. JA B E Zonin Ordlnarte Amendment No. 79 -03 - Vanir Rtsearch - lB� A c an,e o zone rom - to -P or t e ro-ert orated on the nort est corner o t treet an H.c a venue. ORDINANCE NO. 79 (SECOND READING) ............................. . 42 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 101 -16 FROM A -1 TO A -P LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE. F. Ordinance No. 58 -A - An amendment to the original ordinance .. ... . 44 ;_ii was a oDte February 21, 1979, which provided for obtaining dedications and street improvement as a condition of issuance of a building permit. The original ordinance allowed exceptions to the requirimert of street improveuants it was not intended that exceptions be granted for the dedication requirements. The amended ordinance also corrects other structural problems and brings the ordinance into conformance with those applied in the storm drain ordinance City Council Agenda -5- May 16, 1979 „p a•^'� ORDINANCE NO. 58-A (FIRST READING ... ...... .. .. ..... ... .. 41 tJ• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 58 ESTABLISH- ING REQUIREMENTS FOR DEDICATION OF RIGHT -OF WAY IN THE CONJUNCTION WITH BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ® G. An ordinanrz amending the moratorlum, ordinance to allow the developuent of mo a are ar s a an qucKe ORDINANCE NO. 64 -A (URGENCY) ..... .... ..... ..... . I........ So AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGP. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 64 TO EXEMPT MOBILE HOME PARKS FROM THE MORATORIUM ESTABLISHED BY ORDIHfJICE NO. 64, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. - , }ptl �Ana ppeal b Sierra Savin s a ea11n the Planning Commission's.. 51 _ e�,on to en tie use o a monument st n for Sierra Sam_ V__ng5 mrtheast an Loan ovate wt n e s o n center on the corner of t and Carnelian. The Director, under the authority of the Sign Ordinan:e, had approved the sign program with the exception of the proposed y}s4t� monument sign which is not permitted by the Sign Ordinance. Sierra Savings and loan had appealed the Director's Jecislon to the planning Commission on April 11. 1979 The Planning Commission dented the appeal since such a request was not Justified under the prevision of the Sing Ordinance. City Council Agenda 9 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS -6- May 16, 1979 ' A. Re ort Re ardin Expansion of Dial -A -Ride Service - by Jim.......... 6T TO nson 8 Resolution of the�ouncil of the City of P. ancho_C_ucamon a,,,,. -- 67 re ar n Aao Eton a theSan Bernard n Eount o'lssoTTdatede• — enera P an - eport by JaCK Lam. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -43 . ... .... ... .. .. ...... ................... 64 v A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING ADOPTION OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CONSOLIDATED GENERAL PLAN. C. Appeal Pa4c�el Mao 4783 Ca tons - Report b loyd Hubbss .... 65 Mr. RAland Sanchez "an ealina the Ci Enain er's Re :rt . i� �Fy ti d jj1V E. r Y F to t is for 4 wai of I the devLAJoftnt of - Deer Creek Creek Bridge DesiDesicn Standards - Report by Lloyd Hybbs ......... . 74 Approval of recommended design standards for the construction of bridges over Deer Creek and Hillside Channel including full sidewalk improvements at 24th 25th and 26th Street Bridges. The sidewalks will be five e� ei� ide ont eacfi side of the b e ri d Authorization to construct Carnelian Street Between Avalon and Orange Street. Approval of a resolution authorizing the County to assume maintenance of Carnelian Street between Avalon and Orange Street for the duration of the construction of the widening and resurfacing RESOLUTION NO. 79 -41 . . . . .. . 9T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION OF CARNELIAN AVENUE FROM AVALON AVENUE TO ORANGE AVENUE. Acceptance of improvement Agreement for Street for Street i�rovrrents - VanAntwerp. RESOLUTION NO 79 -42 .. .. .... .. ............... 93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MOt1GA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP WAIVER IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. 29T,r 6mnncdp Agenda -7- May 16, 1979 on............ ............ 96 6. 6dnerard .'Avenue FAU Right of Way Acquistti ,AppnDLal of an A9reewntwith and Engineerinofttherright- ,rtgirt-.vt rosy ,aeDS, app ford i the widening nth and retsignment of Vineyard Avenue between ;u Acceptance of 'Litters of Credit and Agreement for Tract 9445. R,ES[dprt1ON 3tO. 79-44 .................... .. ..................... ...112 A p0U19liI0N ,OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO IU MONrE 5£CURITY,�AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NOAGREEMENT- ENT p. .Acceptance mf 'letters of credit and Aere?ment for Tract 9540. ...... 115 RE =OLlA10N TtD. 79- 45 ................... _ A pEz OLUTID'A�OF THE ,CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO SI{PRDl r SECURITY.4 P AND FINAL MAP IMPROVEMENT FTRACT NO. 9540. jL Reavest from the Sen 'Bernardino Count DQ rtment of Agriculture regue r ng t o t o t ant o ucaaonga a o nt a we resentatti we fl0 t pM1t io eese nett veusu Prevention mss. on. nniuncti on xith the. .• X17 ���� R nest Authorization to conduct in c�_� a �LOma �Hioh •Schoo Han Boosters a1Fo nders Da Yarade', No r . g _ by ,B No ey. ✓P 7D 1FRoo aLTN AT?ORUFY'S'REPO" :B. KEW NUSIiL'. r�.X �&JD a. Council � y_ ,Audience '9. ADOOURI 017 MM �.G ow. LTa $ "` r^ L 2m• s zm+ n -o. 2A ^i •-+zS �+ Nz A ��rm V+mI H zl A K •rICN a Oa 9 i A m O S K 9 N J)ry 9 l � 1 � 1 i i Y NY +^ WO n i N u +d m +o r a � a +C a 'H l' •S n i A O im 2 iA n r a S m J O]C n na � mn a a Z �1 A A m mo TO a O me z AA n mz �+ zs r nr my H O 2 Y p o s ry V N b A O C 2 �1 WW ry NN 6W WY NNArvY N YNrYOm WONNPYPOrv1WVW0 �n NOOOOONVrWVOmOOOYVGVO •Y 000000 DtaOVOOmOONWYN00 OOOOOOOOOOOOODONV,nN00 O +1 • Y f I rn JI A f. N N W W V• U p O mT AA mm PP W W A f O O 00 JV PP 00 a� °n n m <aommmammam ^aNyVV ?NUWW aUOVOVNOaa n00000UUOMp UUUUUNVUUUV ✓�+H�+rrr PPPPPPPPPPP VJJJJVVJJJ+ aaaaaaaaaa.c T 2 a ti O V ra- N m N P ✓N�+)+ O U W AOPNmPrW V O mm: UAUJPP: W Pi+U00.OPNr -�A N AOOmO.[IJUIr+W CY - t• ' d m O A O y v y O f T r 1 a r s I c 1 r O D 1 A I b x o 1 !m1 c a N a d a a a U D x w a 2 9 n 2 s - v o g • v n • v •< M m x r o r n I < o v s V A V N 9 \ N y A 4! P N N r A 2 G V m r m A a Z to a m= m rn JI A f. N N W W V• U p O mT AA mm PP W W A f O O 00 JV PP 00 a� °n n m <aommmammam ^aNyVV ?NUWW aUOVOVNOaa n00000UUOMp UUUUUNVUUUV ✓�+H�+rrr PPPPPPPPPPP VJJJJVVJJJ+ aaaaaaaaaa.c T 2 a ti O V ra- N m N P ✓N�+)+ O U W AOPNmPrW V O mm: UAUJPP: W Pi+U00.OPNr -�A N AOOmO.[IJUIr+W CY - P o A P P P P m a N a d a a a - o I < o V A V N 9 \ a A ONi N A r A m A a Z a m= 11 U m YI W A p 2 N N A A 0 1 o n \ N + N A ,1• a m St J 9 9 fi • ° s� Y Cy- �� m m o y O O m 7 O H r r r r 0 0 o 1 m S m J 2 m W W W W L U A U A U O N A W N Z � S o \ y S a 1 rn JI A f. N N W W V• U p O mT AA mm PP W W A f O O 00 JV PP 00 a� °n n m <aommmammam ^aNyVV ?NUWW aUOVOVNOaa n00000UUOMp UUUUUNVUUUV ✓�+H�+rrr PPPPPPPPPPP VJJJJVVJJJ+ aaaaaaaaaa.c T 2 a ti O V ra- N m N P ✓N�+)+ O U W AOPNmPrW V O mm: UAUJPP: W Pi+U00.OPNr -�A N AOOmO.[IJUIr+W CY - j. �. m ,:_nm 'OiF+= {!.�°1?i t'. i r--.m T_..E _ __„._ .Y..`:- �- ��Kt�F•r- .,�- _'4?.._� -•` - rv:a...r--Y' == O. : -n 7" •- �A O o o 'm C. m. +: -- m.^t.. OO.`.y' ' y t�Y 000000000 .•1 I O J O y O y0 �i:p.. -Ofd Y�••+.�YrA..YY O r 0 O O Y O. _',Y +VY 1 N Y .N000000 I n 0 O m O I IC oil I 1III a C I O 1 0 1 0 1 I C l a A Vlt( n NNNNNNNNN (-1 2 A N N d= N C'1 O y d C N 1 •mil b rrrrYf.. -+rr b y b I d N O N d Z d W. y d y 1� l i z o a s s n m s s m A A N ••1 y y O I y A O T -� 9 D n p O A Y o n e 2C1 O N A • N O A m y r I N I "I b -bl C1 TP ddddddminN y y r O J yr JJJllOmlW 2 T d Y (\ N OOGOOOONO C $ T I m 0 W am I ii4.1 1 A O P N N 000000000 NrrrOrrNO A I N P r W mOOJn.+00P1 m I b PrOrPOYmd I I aN NNNUIUIUINNN O N N N N l N N \ \ \ �Y Y.YYMrrYYY .•I Y Y M TP PPPPPPPPP m P I P P P O P Y P Y P .IJ �IJJJJJJJJ � r y J N y y y id ddddddddd d � d d d d d d d VIA mm Jl- 'N)JSS� I 'A D A -a •O p ^ N il"1 YbN��ADmf.1 D m •� pia udp} GAA I } A T a O T m r + b y WmrZ\+dmSS r\ 1200 O '• '= I - n InN I 3 N N n C m l7 P 2 M^+<mmN $mob >Yy Db O S m A r <m$NN IC \\ p r C m C I.Ci O 9 m \mmm9myY N x N S D a<Krr)C d 9 .r. .r. m O O.- +a+•n.•�t m-I O I$d l-1 Y P1 D m $a$$K rS rn D NKOTm m •r•I lx r 11 r A I Z d 9b A NS A y 1 N )c0 OK b t 2 S K Td $ I n N JCW O SN p I d 1 ti N N y m 9 .L O M O • C Y N -1 2 y +•1 y ••1 'O A y +•1 �+ � o y m m I O y o ^•1 o y O -1 m � O ••1 O Oa. D y •Y >. n 0 o a n o 0 0 0 0 0 o ce m A m m O O O m Y O O m i 1 a I 1 l 1 \ I 1 F4 O J C d � 1 I 1 1+•r NN YY �aN JJ nn lf•N rW N Ia0 PP ll ll r r NN NN ll .1 NO+a U1P0PN10 I PP dd NN NN m m p(i yJ : l •• NOYJONO100 I WW rY NN NN m \O 00 NN NN A dOP(fOP0000 NN PP 00 00 O O 00 mm JJ n m r'•: V V G� Ci C/ l0 V V .I �I U �/ �l , p C G•j ■ 0 ' DO -�1 J 1 J N 00 -1 00000000 -i O ti J J J w O K`• 0•' J''r+•r0 O O 0 0 F'••' O n+ + ►I'+'.+'r+ 0 w O O 0 O O r O `•••, !(sll 1 1 11 It111111 1 1 1 1 1 jP} 1 to 1 N 1 rr 1 aooz lr w+ 1 P 1 N t N 1 �• 1 p ' 00 m O T O m dd m OOO.OJNn.••+ m O m 0 0 0 0 �• n O' FI m 1 ^ ^ 2 i.r.. v 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S t s M" A b I s F IJ = �+ m V WNN1nWNNN T N N -1 r N Nm m P m N r NN r O}WD }m }yr m O -1 O a } m O r N A O O K 2 O K b Y m < b m m _ 2 O m y 2 1 n A A m a O r O m K n b H A m m O O G K ^1 v ♦ m ♦ m •♦ m n _ s b ' x 9 O K 09 < b V O D O n bb N Cf b m o x \ i C •Y y x O n � b 9 m S A K •: W W .+ aT W O J N W N 6 W YI } UN d } AA WmmtI1U1NNU1 m YI } N V1 \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ 1 rH W W NN ••n•r0-6.mm 1-• r O W r n• PP O O PP PPPPPPPP P P P P JJ J J JJ JJJJJJJJ J J J J J ad a d dd dadddaad d d d d d vv oovvwS = r and A n .T OMVO a A a m n T.+lnamvo -.t v z n r 11 xn o•+z- .olnvm m v n a r m r »mzrrtz -•x n m PO Iro vv 2 nm 000 -r m n D dd z AA l Mon 2 1 1 T fn c x v }} nvn nmTn ITS \\ v I.. -o r a z mm aro nz= m o ate+ n H 9 hh m �1 '�2 '•` t ! n n n }} t m m r \\ n N C NN m NN O _ n m s 0 m P O m m m a 0 o 0 o m O m -1 9 T O ti '-1 •Y 9 �I 1 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 r Y d S m 2 mm } } } Y d J• } a 1I1 O m ..1 N WN m J P N N UI } NO++ N N P R r WY mmd J d O O P Ja Wim o o o U1 .'ry M'PtT 0 0 a 0 0 J tnN N nJ "MJ •+N.OPJ aOJ I••NOOPd'•^WP m A VIONNJam .JJ NN rrvn mm RP NN m m mm RR O O }} tn} Utn 1+ r PP Rn• 00 0 o tJW r� 00 O O t•'• tJr} 1 - -�' y a••t'+.+`: A G- �kk'Y'4 -Gw�i i�C'� A :i.fr �C. - Y1 _...._ _ C -., t- _•r.r.:..- VIN _ ` -.`o __ _,__ _�"'.i ._ =i -i; c•, e.., `.� �• ^,'O w -` - •O % -� -' O. M ._• m ., O In m O m m m W N Z. -na,`p `";• Y Y Y /.O rrr 00 Y ••1 O O O O P O O O P P i, ti d' °• �1' .y o o O V'• y J< o° O O ••1 O •J 00 K 000 H JM N• O ••1 y • t 1 ° f i� 1 O Y 1° i° ° Y o 00 o r O n K 1 1 rr 1 Nrr t 1 O ti T O r O r O >< Y x O 3 b m dd .-• ON r O on 00 a • O b 0 n t N: a 1 r r C 1 1 r I r 1 1 m NNN O t l H 1 In C n U G U r t N P C a N= C P a PP S m m + z a In m a •O n •0 K 00 AAA O A0 •O Cl y a r In O n In aA mmrtl 00 m m z N n 11 O n O D f m n �r SA~ N b T 1< n 1 n N N n N In D7 n p r r i < C N T N r S09 n 1t In m C 1OI•t1 G r • r P •n m O O r r .m. y s S D a n Lt T N r�.n -1ti m X b DD Iflmm 2 O v n n n b r n NNN on on ~n n n 0 � a a 1 T � •+ rr_ a 0 o x zx m S n N o 2 NN AA to o Z < m A rJ NN O Y O b Y WW (1 Inr OJ 9 al m m L A f A A A N N Y1 UVf N�\JI VIN N O W N W Y Y Y YY rrr 00 Y ••1 O P O P P P PP PPP AA P T •O.O.O ,00 J f O ti O n d T nr. mom Sa O r a On TTT (Tm r 2 p D O my TWn TT D K C = m 2 In m a mm nnn �C f n r In O n In aA mmrtl 00 m T 11 O O D f m n �r SA~ OO T 1 N n N CCG D7 n p r < N r S09 rr 1t 9 1 •n TT9 rr O a rrr fllltl N r�.n -1ti m X D Iflmm f NNN a n � a 1 T � •+ a m cx w b Inr 9 al Y •r � O 0 A A O V 2 9 O t a In a m m m o 0 m m � T 9 9 ••1 ••1 N°04 9 y ((��• D a a b a D L• n D D ]m• 0 o a r r r r r Y r o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... In O O In O r Y Y r •4 00 a y T 1••. In m r T p p p p p T Yr p a m .+� •D 2 O S r N ut VI U N 2 .00 N D N m N P N V1 A W N r N NJ O Y a P 2 \ O N C ,O z H as r f N N N N W I.f WW In,n YNm JJ f Gf fb O n N N PP on AI• WJ,A •OWr•� Y •1V• I O n 0 0 W W on AA AA W: U •+NwA• O 41M Oa > •I •, O O O O J J 00 rY PP lu J,n J.OI•A O no V1N O O O O 0 0 00 AA Yr tit<d OINWo O 00 00 • • 4 • d O O • ♦ d 9 a i n m 411 w S b t0 1 t0 t0 4 0 0 0 �0 0 0 .0 G 0 i.} my dm?f:z.�'r'm ^'.':rg`?' ^m {�'iyfr"- ."m -c, : T:.. t +- ✓� ,;- _ `. �T, -. r:� ..'.- •- �:++.r�_•����;�_ tif9d�:: ,' -- «Oe �e;,_:O •' ' "..'O -.. -�O � O O fl I O O O"... p "�J [ ?.•00'�J Y y J �1 O y J t O y y I O y JJ +-1 .KV' 0 0 .•' O O O t•' O a K r p 00 O O r y J�` 1 JIB' -+e rr 9 d a d T O T O T m T O •! 00 T d T O V J NN O P N 17 1 O m S 1 O 1 1••• r 1 fl C I 1 D I I D 1 a 1+ 9� WO O O y N 2 N W 2 Y 1• r N r N H D S b Y Y S m It y y n 9 m C A H r r A C A A r n I b A ^ n O m r Y K e C Y m y � b O I b ti F a m i o .r p a .bi o 2 n 2 n (1 ral oo 2 a w n • 2 ♦ e • K p i ♦w ♦ 2 y I K W Z N d � ° IW n Im I ` N+11 N A j• 1� N O In NN U N V I�r r W N W 1+ y I r 00 O N J JJ J J J J 4t J JJ J L dd b d d d d I d I dd d J d 'T 2T C :. .A \ Ct a 9 r S r AA mm a O T �O N to N •P 'JC. m D 2 I p 1 T T C '2 O nr D G CC � 1 NO 7p 0 n GG J mm S Y \ ti O A A A 9 D Da In G T a I m 9m A t2'1 d a y p MS O \ A D I OOp0 rr d 02 Sy y A H 1 { I N V J •y m Cl N y I m A I9 Ri S� r r (- o p p o 0 00 o 0 i a uai i w '' 1 O a N d N 1. N ."o W umi O 2 I t°il J N dd N p P Y T \ I � O J i y I I �� 1 W IY n W W N N O(•I JpW In O[l P P W W W W NN I WW O pO Pwm 00 O O O O tp tD 00 I PP O 00 O O 00 ,I, dpD ' 00 D O 0 0 0 0 00 I PP O 00 O O 00 • • ♦ • ♦ w 9 • s e } b I d p m I � I I — -- - - - -- -- - - 000000 �1 O H �1 1jam.-111 O I OnK NNNNry 1 O I n O 000044 pN I N n T ri1NNNJ �! C N O C O rrrrWW '1 �1 2 ti Y A S 2 S O m f1 D 2 C m s T 2 S a o m 2 Z e n n N m s n z A mNN 1 NO ..• NWWJWW 2 coox0o � o.omr�on o NrACOW P.Om SWN 1'l NPOmVJ m NNVINNN rr•.rrr PPPPPP JJJVJJ �aamoaa ■ 1 O -1 O n r 0 P P N O \ a r K P m .O r N P O N v P C N A C T r o m = a A A a H A m n N H m V A m I T IC 2 I m A ( x o Ia a A M A m D IH N \ I n P Ix \ O J Ii a y N.r NN .�OJ PN NOPJt� 1�P ti��, ..: - -__ ,_ _ - __�__� N P \ V o ._ ,: - -_ -M •a -mow .x}'`-,y+ AA MM 2 CC O 2 N TO rr 22 �• j• T1 < -}� .• m r 00 {'1 nn V A o A tl a I O r \ Im A o u n rr z rr .+ mm Iti r n O xx n = a m S K. O K O � O 0 00 O •+ p ��+ O �+ O r a .� p •+ " N \ r NN �+ A 1 O 1 Ntn 1 1 1 N 1 •1.. 1 M 1' P N_ 00 N .D N 00 N O 9 N A O y N N 00 d Z NN r 4 N n s P m 9 N= N V T 00 +1 J .Pa a c s s o x p O ti a O tl O y A a p •• m f A `a oV S O A as z o r s n M tl ♦0 m y m n 2 O A n -• � r D rr N2. m a r ma P 1 \' I N NN N 00 P Db \ \\ V JJ o m,o •D P \ J a NN PP \\ JJ ma N P \ V o N P \ V a N P \ V a P \ V a AA MM 2 CC O 2 N TO rr 22 �• j• T1 < -}� .• m r 00 {'1 nn V A r A x mm a DD a I xx rim On r \ Im A o u n rr z rr .+ mm Iti r n O xx n = a m S o i A W \ 9 N \ �+ A 1` N • N d H n T A m T 0 M O V O 0 -• p ti O V r O -• r Ta m O 0 00 K 00 0 N 0 •.. 0 �-. 0 �-. 0 r 0 O M N mm mw m N m A m W m N .+ M S N YI 1 r WW N O .nr JV .. O O 00 NN m O 00 00 S.rN ON.n NWN 000 non NN RCN rr PP WW N N WW no no TI m � V m 0 n •• •• 00 00 N N 00 00 N N n m I • N I L L L L. tir L' L= L L L L ��' i�Ytii. ?: ri.. +^p5fi...��T.__'.;tll���,,.�...w :;r ..� ^_. N N �= a_Y..- "•. Y„ _.�'�t.': +t^.dRi,�i :/ B+ Yr,` �u*,• Yr' r-'^ l< "� : • '(A b m N �4- Y Y OO Y Y Y Y YM 1^ � '<'y ry �r i " N ll P d P P N P LT PC 61 b i^ •i N r m x iT ti• V G J G J G JV G J G G Nm O •+ 00 O O G O G O O O m OO TI -1 Y Y Y Y b A mm m m 0 b 0 J 0 Y( 0 TT =.! o D o rJ 1 J] o m m a S o mY O OD V Y Yr a ' •yJ O •A O N JJ O O J O J O ti O H 00 e O 00 O J Ot r Y O Y O OO 0 O Y O Y p Y O Y p Yr M O Y 0 O O •� r 1 11 n 1 t 1 ba 1 1 1 1 1 Y t n 1 •1• 1 NU ( Y I P 1 r 1 N 1 NY 1 Y 1 N 1 Ur J) X �O X 00 < .O y O V J] H O •f ON N J] N O N O( W X NN N a Nt P P O O P N r r G l0 •+ U< Y b Y O b ll a ti P W A K ^• C V Y� r X N L m r m n m S m r o v v n a S O a a r �• •+ m a S N r m n N t O La'1 T n z rb y ♦• K N O O N r a C vv AA n a O D K T1 N rr O m m m r0 40 4W O = b N m n O l N t U NN V O m1 Y O N m W mm W l NL d t JJ 0 Y aP Yr m Or t Y P l A Jm U O O♦ J J J b J J Y m YN W W 1 O N• P. • Y P U 0 J •W+ Nt U N J J Of N N NrY N N N N NU N N NL b m N J Y Y Y OO Y Y Y Y YM 1^ Y Yr d P ll P d P P PP P P PC D b N •i b r x p r V VV J V J J JV V J J• NN Nm O •+ 00 O O N O m O O O O m OO TI -1 Y Y Y Y b A mm m m to b GO J N Y( 9 T TT a 1 D N rJ 1 J] dr m m 1 1 S G mY O OD V Y Yr a mm 00 AJ] � NN m O N P a sn r i r O xv 00 e or 00 Xx r p r z as n r al o mm m (^ i m N -vim rNnl- n °O -+ ba v mm m Y n o r ° ao f E. _ g m c'i m O Y -1 O b m N J Y r O r mm T Y•+ n N a b b b 2 D b N •i b r x p r r r r H 0 ll On Pd NN Nm O •+ 00 O O N O m O O O O m OO TI -1 Y Y Y Y b Y m m m m m to m m N T O J 2 00 J V J •• J C P P N N 00 • W r d PP 3 a m m VIU mm 00 AJ] PJO NN N O N P N P 1 I 1 O Y Y m N J Y r O mm Y•+ N a b J b D D b b b b D r r r r r r r r r 0 ll On Pd NN Nm O •+ 00 O O O O O O O O Y OO Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y m m m NN m m m m m m m m J 2 00 J V J •• J C P P N N 00 • W r d PP YY O mN VIU mm 00 AJ] PJO NN Y Y m N J Y r O mm Y•+ N N J RR YY NN rY Yr OC lr�r W N O ll On Pd NN Nm PP Y Y L.rW Vl O J] O Tm mm N OY ll NVr ll NJr VrN Pd : P : Oi • • • • • •• •• •• •• •• ••• •• • W P d PP YY O mN VIU mm 00 AJ] PJO NN YY lV• N P J ll 00 O 00 00 Om 00 JIJ! Jt�W NN YY Wl� ♦ f E. _ g i I D n nl r T .1 --a -• A r a a s �n x x r r r s c r N ti Y Y O N T p O O C C J P O T 2 1 m T 9 N N b o r W O z A K J o n • :c O N ti 0 �+ K n O m c 2 Tx n _ Cv s xm x oz 0 n b C Y b 0 N U x N d P Y O w C_ N W Y J O O d N W • W J Y O W YI O 0 0 N ti O� p n n D n nl r T .1 --a -• A r a a s A a x x r r r s c r N N Y Y O N T p O C C J P O 2 1 m S O N N b O A K J • v O N ti OT �+ K O m 2 Tx _ Cv xm oz a C m m• w 0 A H m Y P h O Y, IF IMF�- 1■■.. League of California Cities / Com IRMO tYOrE impaNSt Sacramento, California- �fA_._���e�_�(11� May 2, 1979 Tot MEMBERS, CITY MANAGERS DEPARTHEN➢ PROGRAH CDi04I7TEE FROHt BOB GROGAN, CITY ADMINISTRATOR, SANTA MARIA First, I want to thank arch of you for your contribution in mekinS this year's Spring tlaeting a sracasa and because of that success we now he" the responsibility for developing the program for the Summer One -Day Meeting (Friday, July 13) and t1to departmental prngraas at the Annual Conference (September 22 -25) Lit San • Francisco. Therefore, the following Program Committee ranting has been sort DATE: Thursday, May 26 TIME: 10:00 a.m. - 4z00 p.m. PUCE: Airport Marina Hotel - Burlingame 1380 Bayshore Highway Burlingame (Trenaportation is available from the S P. Airport to the Hotel) It is important that we begin nw to firm up these programs and I hope it will be possible for you to take the limo to attend this meeting. Ir order to assist the staff in raking appropriate amangerents for this meting, we tmuld appreciate your completing the attached At ^dance Form and returning it to the Sacramnto office of the League by May 10. Attachrant 0' 10 Kama SYAECi StCnMtEW0M14 I0DT11C1N1Ew0w1` SEMME:ETeSM I2161�l:90 14I5Ie:13010 m00 twt511FE BLVD SMEt6i •105Aa0t1Ba9mmlr :tulax..,ait •x• :f ■ MEM0RANDUIt 0 Date: May 10, 1979 To: City Manager and Council mrom: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services .'nubject: Accession System -This matter pertains to the acceptance by the City of donated or Loaned items having "historic significance" W= an individual has an item, such as a photograph for example, that depicts an early period in our community's development, he may wish to donate it to the City for prosterity. Or he may loan it to the City for reproduction. The process of the City's acceptance of items would be managed _ utilizing the attached Control Form Action flo-:: 1) Donation or loan of item offered, 2) Review by Preservation Commission and recommendation to Council regarding acceptance; and, 3) Council action Staff Co.unents 1) The H P C at their Hay 8 meting reviewed the attached form and recommend fonrarding to Council for approval, and to request authorization to implement accession system for the City 2) Not all items offered can be accepted due to storaga limitations 3) As no budget for the preservation effort exists, we will need to rely on Service Organizations to defray costs involved in photographic reproduction or restorations Staff Recommendation Authorize the implementation of an accession system for Rancho Cucamonga S BH/nm I CITY Op RAM1.1 r MAMMA OMM icy 16, 1179 To: City ComcfI FFM: Lloyd W os, City Engirt!r Sve.TecT: COSEW CULWtz WCT M9 - f'.w?prt roads and release bond Lnmted on the east sfee of Sa;Vilre Street between }Banyan Street and Ifiliside Read WER: "art 1'i Vzfnes. Inc. 2951 tedbill fdrsare - Costa II,a, California 92626 ?erforrance 6=- (bad) USA.= WrF: the rosd construc:ica has been approved as being In accordance mlth the road improvement plans and it Is reumeY.ed that the roads be accepted. The improve - afents fnclde curb, gutter, pavifg, walls and street sign. "�x v. J •� i � Erf• �• • A �•s.f• r _ o� _ �b _ / -tau -P .. -1 •y�w. n.+.n,.• i,. � lr d N It 'a !,kill. _ ttl��tl d N It 'a �tl •.i7 ?r li : I n_ •a .l Y- r !,kill. • - ItlINJJ l4 ^ • �tl •.i7 ?r li : I n_ •a .l Y- r •a ,r r. a_ I AZ;' =� n " cam`$•: °:�%'.' - y I 5. EJL• , 1 .a.,.Jr .. +l h.�•. •'. 1 cj s; - =ill ' v I .1::•tt a;;;:l � ,pt •�; Ili i; ICI: I Irt!•, I t x � t.i• 1 , r r• � r �; \ t f f•L Y t Y{ 1�, •,�.l.r �i I x: .a. I� i r' 1' � �/ a r s. t 3�• � 3 n t a I st- s{ a IY � • r � LY. •�t i{ i• 1 f .: .... '. �. 1�/1,) -n.. 5. EJL• , 1 .a.,.Jr .. +l h.�•. •'. 1 cj s; - =ill ' v I .1::•tt a;;;:l � ,pt •�; Ili i; ICI: I Irt!•, I t x � t.i• 1 , r r• � r �; \ t f f•L Y t Y{ 1�, •,�.l.r �i I x: .a. I� i r' 1' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 7 MEMORANDUM , DATE: May 16, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd fiubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9288 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the north side of Lemon Avenue between Haven Avenue and Revere Avenue OWNER. G S R. Development Marcos Anzueto _ 6111 Garfield Street Chino, California 91701 Performance Bond (Road) $26,000 ' NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it 1s recommended that the roads be accepted The improve- ' ments include curb, gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls and street signs IV UNINCCRPORtJCO rCRRITORY Or rMC COUVTY OP SAN RCRVARDINO CCIAC A sv .&ISION C! POP)IC", or LOTs JS . %D J6. Or 1`007HILL IPOSTL.55 - i "IT'tOurAILYS TRACT NO 1• AS KR UJP RCCOoOCO IV a V. PACC JA. OF "UPS O£CCP05 Or TMC Cf tii Y Cr SA.V BCRNA „ VO. GLIlCRNLA ANDRCASCN CNCINCCRIAO CO SCALC 1 •La APRIL I9:6 7 A S 3 L J ; 6 I 5 J C2:lt L )I�[[[eM.q arNN•I)N•! I. [aa.r. Iy [le frn /e.LMd v Io > 4ro.....v a.mor /qa[I W q•. rI N/M II. wnr .x! pr P. t.. r . Hn•.wf.:u N..ry � L Tri MI. PM [blrl tl•b]j. p+.'[/ wM'•C eM Ay]rf/ lC[ITJ Y / /!IA'N /b•fMen. _ ..Stw. erox/ Jm/ /.�vv Ar! tRY n n 0.v dalt n /.X fw+/ P'e/r[ /.n'. dW� ldr bt J.res. ✓vrY I O.N. &I CJ1. ACL LYN.J•Ybb• fiV1•G1 N.r•C.'W( fr Y.im O /t•'rY !•C.n J Cr.fa fnRJ•rs �:r /SU nlsa jy eI 3f.Vro� r."•n ,t CL..) ie•¢.r 3' I t SL .I.,Yfr c ) •r •Dx. Lwe . IYtlP. Y •r.M Nrt w!rell w �.�.w.Y n^ ..�.I.�.Yi✓Nw, r um rn.wr.'�.Lw rl I1Y .I N.1/Y .Ir•IIM NI mC i %.I) p vff(f'fm.•. 1q1. 1��� }j� �I 7 A S 3 L J ; 6 I 5 J aI= l.�i�.Ilx 1 Y LO :S 7 •9 C L� tt1~ LLYON tti� .IrS.. av .n •�f rfMl •,, Z �I • iii :�. /:. I v Io > It 8' � _ ..Stw. � n -• djlµF� 3f.Vro� j, vlJJ mfC 3' . IYtlP. Y •r.M um vff(f'fm.•. 1q1. 1��� }j� i � F t : F r•� i J r! ' I ✓. .: M i ia�n� 1. aI= l.�i�.Ilx 1 Y LO :S 7 •9 C L� tt1~ LLYON tti� .IrS.. av .n •�f rfMl •,, Z �I • iii :�. /:. I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 MCMORANDUM DATE: May 9, 1979 T0: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9348 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the east side of Turner Avenue at Pala Alto Street OWNER. Kaufman and Broad Homes, Inc P 0. Box 19550 Irvine, California 92713 _ Performance Bond (Road) $104,000 117TE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted The improve- sments include curb, gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs Y ?ri I fd C S nod -Ad /O9 ,n CO°C 3 -dn. Per C.S A 4014 17eS � e 4IM Z •� ''lo IZ 11 V r n 1.N hAN 2 Q Apt y^ 10 STREOT D y 1 i 00 I E � `^� \ \ IFPALO °ALTO \j •PT,r� r� l7Nf Of lVrJ S At 7' BANSJAYS JVSPNI roe. 0/71 - \ y; Ne9'Sk'4o'[ \\ 660.96: �� I I:LO. P6, -evA la 3 1 •!7 !43 •• wM NAwr[R! lug .,. };,C S[ COP L0, 4 Pi -T— IC to — { Iy� - -- vrd ?'JP t.J 2342 P[R TRACP NO. COS MB 131/J4•ti J m e I 'fd 1`I0 LJ [l4[ P[4 r. TRACT NO 8015 •,O 13,114 lb T ,a y Rl' 0 71 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 16, 1979 To: City Giuncil FR%I: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9350 - Accept roads and release bonds Located on the south side of Banyan Street at Peridot Avenue OWNER. The Yellow Brick Road Building Company 2082 Business Center Drive, Suite 145 Irvine, California 92715 - performance Bond (Water) $20,000 Performance Bond (Road) $66,000 NOTE: The sanitary water system was approved by the Cucamonga County (later District on April 5, 1979 The road con - structior, has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is reconrended that the roads be accepted The Improvements include curb, gutter, paving, walls, and street signs. oa0 ufo t�•ua o +cwln) f 'lua•ntn.1 \•.a r, rAt ♦. o•aL: �'W M'R%Vl:n on n WI I ayLIV.[•lq %Ma ctr_ -::x vur ;r snru La! rn•:� v eu.us )nm Iw(•auof ' il. }. �t -�. _, nip +•w S• fa I• w.✓ jLf .n �1• r�t i• � 'iii �.'1f• (;�� ". � •. i I• .nl� a.. F .\ w I•'rn. e` nfr AFC ir•n.. �" ,• OrArer r a 1 • •1 1:1 •• f•V( ••bv• 1. it ' n .. n • „^ rn _ inn ...• u.� P• • •• r._ �ie• r.. •• - • ■ y CITY OF MNCIIO CUCAMONGA • NEP1O1LtNDU11 DATE: May 16, 1979 TO: City Council Fpmt: Lloyd Hutbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: COIISEHT CALENDAR TRACT 9355 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the southeast corner of Beryl Strect and Almond Street O'dNER. R. L. Sievers d Sons, Inc 6481 Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B Buena Park; California 90620 - Performance Bond (Road) 106,000 NOTE: The road construction has bren approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the street be accepted The improve- ments include curb, gutter, paving, exalts and street signs. `^ w •jy: Y lt�il S:l ii'_�y 'l:t'7 °•. anva•r ea i : � :ii �j j•:t {t 1. LO end :ay .4 � >• }i : C[�O Irya; Q __ 0 Q:3 r ig ti �p { � 4 t• . ^ •� a •: JneatY ? � UGCU:CN V iYau� 2 D. �! c C iq St7a: ' � '• n e . 1 Y LIt jl ! a _ • L! V " n 2 1 • 1 a ki 4 • !J �t jig • i i F:! `ii it • a. ' "•��3 " i; � 3. li'''d'' • =.. :,_ � a; Ell y:aE : a •c.. • '. w • • pp 9E A' :, i n •! .1 t. ; w OCRwlfYl u rr \\I~ 2 tw •` ,. ,�..niJ aJ...;:'r '+ it ; 0-10. q �Z O r\' a ki 4 • !J �t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MCMORAEDUM DATE: Hay 16, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUDJECT: CONSENT CALEIIDAR TRACT 9377 - Accept roads and release bunds Located on the southeast corner of Ibnte Vista Street and Hermosa Avenue OUTER: Bob Jensen Builder, Inc. 226 Hest 'E' Street _ Ontario, California 91762 Performance Bond Sc+rer - on site) $44,000 Performance Bond Sewer - off site) $14,000 Performance Perfoance Bond Hater) $51,000 Performance Band (Road) $152,006 NOTE: The sanitary sewer and Hater systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Hater District on April 27, 1979. The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb, gutter, sidewalks, Paving, walls and street signs: 'S r ,1 t�( it t �rtcr � t t t , i, } t 1 9II i 11 ) f I! "b II1I{ 1 'JOZAUT 04). IY 1M1 41'L l f.1•I,Itll'. R ; VCHO CU:3'10411 114111♦ "'I'll O„11 R "t'AN 15 S!r P:N {OA➢ R St, SVimN SIO1 R tl1D6111 1 i 3 •' �z t e C 0•Itlq.C4frC�13 .— ::.'t -J i�r -v— __ - .. .. _ :f_ __' `1� a .•..o' vov TG �- v.arN ercccT n A I • .I) f � .f. an }� rr Al N,42 { a i �'� ., .. n '( 7'.. +;fib >• -.. I - .a% ::.• Y .tom . , j'[I v1GI .�. , S: YCIr '!�_ii�� JAM -, v. ',' 1•.. i I+ ll '} , � e �_— �YI, r °N ♦I+ /.INL.:CIIhIN ! l.M 7, I ! { I � _ . a I lt• 7 w 1 .: II• 11 - ; ,)• ):\.1!. 3.3 A A. 1 •.] o i . r ••sounn1•mxurt It tl] CI]Y Or NANO NO s It t Y'. Yr-• MnIq, C]ltlClM1 • i ✓ }11 , v 1 i ] .n•...r ` ..vopm•r_!y_CLrr ____ `.".... .. z.. tai. ___ �_ •'! . --iY`t •:1'r �. }r n �errr..e -�'a� aiitL ctL— �s•..•�s]arCTi '-i —:3 r - 7�`'�•sf•.� �����•..l j;l- i AS ,•]� GO ((II� Ol �1] Ltl �1 O�J .ro 3r f . +t It 1 i r .r ♦ . It F s+ is •�) . $ • .fir se t sit' •�,r• :] •�' � "'.1 L�::' S. ".ar yl 3:��. '1 j =dcvt :a— I'`A' 11 r..' ..v f j fy]r' b •'0 . a 1 q 11 (t .� •w• . n a• •1 J, r:r• f, Y Y rr .m a••1•i1• ]] .r ra• ✓ e r, I ORDINANCE NO. 69A py n °,D31:AWCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUNCA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 8 OF ORDINANCE PERTAINS TO t I 30 AS AMEND BY ORDINANCE NO 69, WHICH SCHOOL FACILITIES, TO INCREASE THE FINANCING OF INTERIM FFES THEREULTI£t, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE DEDICATION OF LAND IN LILw TMI REOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamooga, California, does ordain ab follows: SECTION 1: Section 8 of Ordinance No. 30 as amended by California, is hereby Ordinance No. 69 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, amended to read as follows: "SECTION 8: Amount of Fees and Timc of Eawent. _ "(a) When fees are required by this Ordinance such fees shall be as follows: 16(1) For development within the Alta Loma Elementary School District, $893.00 per single- family dwelling and f • per rubile home Space or bedrooms. which containsetw (2)t or =to bed ng structure "(7) For development within the Central School $454.00 per District, $908 00 per single- family dwelling and multiple unit duelling mobile home space or each unit of a two (2) or more bedrooms. structure which contains "(3) For development within the Cucamonga School District, $700.00 per single - family dwelling and $350 00 per dwelling mobile home bedrooms, ccontains h two !(2)for more bedroom. structure which "(4) For development within the Chaffey Joint Union Nigh School DS..trlct. $600 00 per single- family dwelling and multiple -unit h . 1 i $!00.(13 per mobile home space or each unit of a dwelling structure which contains two (2) or more bedrocros. \ �(/ � \ "(b) Any room which is designated for sleeping which has a closet is a bedroom for the purposes of this Ordinance. y r' "(c) Load may be accepted as an equivalent arrangement in a thereof, 1f offered by the developer lieu o: fees, or portion 1'f• and accepted by the achool district Ordinance, such fees "(d) When fees are required by this is approved and 1 shall be paid at the time the building permit t Y iss,icd Fees shall be held i to the to Y Cucamonga. California until transferred " school district or districts I Ordinance No. 69A page 2 "(e) No disbursement shall be =do to any school district until such district has complied with Goverment Code Section 65976 SECTIM 2: The mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the cams, and the City Clerk shall Cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California ATTEST: e, PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979 City Clerk MAI mayor r�- • 0 i • ORDINANCE NO. 70A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 0NGACREATINGRANA CALIFORNIA, (ENDING No 7 PRESERVATION COK4ISSIOH TO NO 70,) ALT IN ADVISORY CAPACITY 70 THE CITY COUNCIL IN OBJECTS, ICEhTIFIAND PRESERVAT 70 HISTORICAL IDENTIFYPERSONSOF OF EVENTS, HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 70 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMOti The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as foll0rs SECTION 1: Section 4 of Ordinance ded to read astf0110ks :of Rancho Cucamonga, California. is hereby The Historic preservation SECTION 4: Membersht Commission s a consist o seven 7) voting members who shall be residentssof the Citsheffoilowin9ucondittonse appointed by the City (a) The term of office for each member shall be four (4) years, except that three (3) of the memberears.sanefointed shall 0 be designated of to serve for years. tens of two (2) Y onrtne Commission. (Thereaftr. he continuity of be fourt(4)ryears. ofasuch fill unexpired term shall be Commission menber may be removed upon the naJcrity (b) A Co vote of the entire Cit/ Council. SECTIOt: 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk s a attest to the same. and the city Clerk shall cause the once 1n The ublishedw,rthia newspape,lof generalicirculation9 published st in the C� WWI,Relo. California. and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California 1079. PASSED, APPROVED. AND ADOPTED this day of ATTEST: t 3v City Clerk __ y0r ORDINANCE N0. 76 AN ORDINANCE OFTHE CITY COUNCIL G AND THE IGy OF RANCHO CUCA110HGN. CALIFORNIA, A CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE R -3 AND AP Z04Z DISTRICTS I ADOPTED By REFERENCE THAT PERTAIN T CODE O AS pyRAt4DAL ZONING AND OFFICE CO`0'LEXES The City Council of the Pity of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain cos follows: 1: Section 61 024E(n) and (b) of the San Bernardino County Code are SECTIOY hereby amended to read as follows: 1 in R -3 Nulciple- The Following regulations shall apply Family residence districts: (a) GENERAL USES PERMITTED: ed Sn the R -1 DSe[rlet as listed in (1) uses arnitt esve ctfons 61 024A(a)(4.1)• (2) Multiple dwellings, or three one - family dwellings Of a permanent nature on each lot. (3) Boarding and lodging houses. (4) Public and private uses as follow, shall bo ). permitted if and development is approv ed as provided inSection61 0219(1 (A) Colleges and univeraiLles (B) Private schools. lodges (C) Fraternity and sorority hoes es g I and private clubs except those whose chief activity Ss a service customarily tattled on as a business. (D) (Raeervad) (E) Philanthropic and ch"Whle institutions. (F) Hobilehoau parks (b) (Reserved) SECTiON 2: Section 61 026(0) and (b) of the San Bernardino County Code are hereby amended to read as follow,: 61.026 AP (Administrative and Pro feesloml) District (a) DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE: AP or Administrative and Professional Office District is a district principally for ndministrativc and profess tonal offices and similar uses. It 1s designed to Provide be cated withlanfunctional administrative and may brelated offices may group of uses. It Is also useful an a buffer district between residential and commercial districts m or between highways end adjacent residential uses. 1 The following regulations shall apply in the AP, Administrative and Professional Office District unless otherwise provided in this code (b) USES PERMITTED (1) Administrative and professional offices such as accountants, insurance agents, medical, dental, architects, engineers or attorneys, real estate offices, appraisers' offices, stock and bond brokers' offleia, escrow offices, in which no activity is carried on catering to retail trade and no stock of goods is maintained for sale. (Am Ordinance 1277.2/14/(b). (2) Clinic, aedical, dental, chiropratic or chiropodist (J) Laboratory, medical, biological, dental, optometrical or research. (4) Optician (5) Prescription pharmacy when related and incidental to a professional building and occupying not =to than one thousand (1,000) square feet of floor apace V provided that no stock shall be visible From the street (6) Art gallery, library, reading room, museum. (7) Building and loan office, savings and loan bank. (8) Studio for professional work in or the teaching of any form of fine arts including photography, music. drama, and dance, where no stock of good is paint, aad for gala, subject to a determination by the Planning Commission Subcomittco that said use will not be detrimental to adjoining ptoperrits becuuse of the volume of noise generated. (9) Temporary or permanent telephone booths. (10) Telephone exchange (11) Other uses or enterprises similar to the above if approved by the Planning Commission no provided in Sertion 61 0219(a)(2) (12) EEattt_ng establishments. (no drive through)- (13) Related commercial uses (a R. blueprintin g. swtionaty, et:.) when incidental to an office bulldinR or complex, if approved by the Planning Commission. -3a . (14) The fellowin uses shall be ermined if the loeetien and development plan is approved by the Planning Ccanlasion: (A) Small anioal vetnrinari_ clinic (no outside do rune . (B) Automobile Service Stations. SECTION 3: Subsections 61.024E(A)(40), 61.024E(b), 6L.07603,03, .61.026(b)(13) of the San Bernardino County Code are hereby repealed. SECTION G: The mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the some, and the City Cle'k shall aCaleasthonc4 IntTheeRa� port. gain fifteen (15) days after its p asage, newspaper of general circuistion, published in thalifornia Ontario, California. and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucaaanga, C PASSED, APPROVED. and ADOPTED this day of 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST C.ty Clerk mayor 33 O Ordinance No. 78 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, P.EGULATING THE STORAGE, USE AND SALE OF SAFE AND SANE FIREWORKS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKNGA. (Please see the May 2, 1979 packr.: -- pages 53 -60) I 'may IPao(' �IIGV� THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONCA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereo, finds .,nd determines the following: shat the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing hold in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezcning of the property _ hereinafter described, end this City Council has hold a public hearing in the tine and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environ- mental impact as provided In the Negative Declaration filed heroin. SECTION 2. The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the canner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. A -1 (limited agriculture) to A -P (administrative professional) Said property is located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue known as Assessor's Parcel Number 202 - 101 -16 This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m on the 31st day after its adoption SECTION 3 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at lease once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California ® PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of 1979. IM ORDINANCE No. 79 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CBC&MONCA CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N4Ai- BER 202 - 101 -16 FROM A -1 TO A -P LOCATED ON THE NO',: rr'IEST CORNER Or 19TH STREET AND ARCIIIBALD AVENUE THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONCA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereo, finds .,nd determines the following: shat the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing hold in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezcning of the property _ hereinafter described, end this City Council has hold a public hearing in the tine and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environ- mental impact as provided In the Negative Declaration filed heroin. SECTION 2. The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the canner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. A -1 (limited agriculture) to A -P (administrative professional) Said property is located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue known as Assessor's Parcel Number 202 - 101 -16 This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m on the 31st day after its adoption SECTION 3 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at lease once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California ® PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of 1979. IM 0 OPDINANCE NO. 58 -A AN uHDINANCF. OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 50 ESTABLISH- ING IN CON- The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as fellows: SECTION 1: Crdinance No. 58 shall be amended to read as follows Section S: Exceptions The provisions .f Sectici 4 shall not apply to: a Alterations; �l an h reconstruction; additionadaesinottexceedn650 s,. -r^ feetdincarea; the • (d) construction of garages, carports, storage buildings, patio accessory toga eingle family-eeside d similar structures, nce SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the city Clerks a attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in "he Da��ert, a neiespaper of general circulation publishenancho LuAN-110a,0ialiforniaCalifornia, and circulated in the of PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this_ day of 1919 ATTEST: C C re k qii Mayor a ;r i 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCMMIIGA MEMORANDUM DATE: Nay 16, 1979 TO: City Council d City Vanager FRC4t: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: AHEHDIMIT OF ORDIMCE NO. 58 Attached for City Council adoption is Ordinance 58 -A amending Section 5 of Ordinance 58 Ordinance 58 was adopted by the City Council, February 21, 1979, and provided for obtaining dedications and street improvement as a conditions of issuance of a building parmit. The Ordinance as originally presented, allowed exceptions to the requirement of street improvements as listed in Section 5 of the Ordinance. It was not intended that ex- ceptions be granted for the dedication requirements. The first sentence In Section 5 stating, "The provisions of Section 4 shall not apply to:', was inadvertently left out in typing the final Ordinance. Ordinance 58—A rectifies this error making the Ordinance conform to the provision adopted at First Reading of this Ordinance. Section 5 has been further revised to make the exceptions conform to those applied in the Storm Drain Ordinance, This has been done for ease of administration by the Building Division. Res ectfully su itted, LLO B BBS City Engineer LBH deb 1 — r ;f i a1• • s OROINANC6 N0. 58 AN OROINAIICE OF Tile cIT1' COVNCIi. OF THE CITY Of RANCIIO COCARONGA, CALIFORMA, F- STAOLISIIIN^. Rr0lituN1NTS FOR DEDICAr1O•: OF RICIIT- OF -I:AY ANn FOR CIINSTRn1'ri(N OF PURLIC RIGOT- OF•RAY tfirROVFAENTS 11) Colli UNCrI(Rl WLTI( n11il.DING CONSTRL'LTION. The City Council of ti,e City of Fnncho Cucamonga, Calt(ornla, does ordain as follow,- SECTIO:: 1: Inck of ImLenrcrarule ilaenrdnuc. a lot or parcel occupted ore Cto be occnplydfl.y eAatuilding,, structure or ipg Parking tat is helel•v fovtd and declared to hp hnanrdmw for pedestrians and vehicular traffic and detrimental to the health, ,nfety and general welfare of the resident, of the City. SECTION 2: Streets and Illghvava - Dedication Rea fired. enlarged or altered And no building propertyshalt hereafter lihe improved for • Parking purposes, and no building permit shA11 be Issurd therefor, unless one -half (1/2) of the street, which Is located on the came side Of the center line of the street as• such lot, has dedicated right-of-way for the full. width of the lot along all street frontnges so a, to meet the Haster Plan and /or Standards for such street. In addition to required dodication for street purposes, additional dedication for storm drain, sever, Water or other utility purposes may nlao he required to connection with building permits where such dedication is necessary to prevent the flacding of adjacent or nearby properties or to permit connection to required utilities. Ll SECTION 7: In the event conatructlon of full frontnre Im- provrmcnta is not Immediately required, any poison required to dedicate land by this section shall mike an Irrevocable offer to dedicate property, executed by all pnrtlrs having an interest to tlee property Including beneflelariea and trustees of derda of truvt no nhown by a current Preliminary title report prepared be n title clnP.eay Approved ley tlee City Engineer. quell offer of dedication almll he In a farm approved by Like City Attorney and tlee City Engineer, end Aball continue In effect until the City Council Accepts or rejects such offer. SCCfIM L; Constnectfon of Publle Improvements - pen lred CencrallY. Any Person, [niter, traitor, or ngrnt ron,trueting or nrranging for the den,truriten of nnv parking lot or remmrrrial, residential or ind11strial buildhgt, or buildloga, nr huliding addition of alteratioe, shall provide tar tier renstruet loon or Inntallnteon to City Standards, of sidewalks, curbs, Cutters, street trees, street Ilrleting, street Pavinr to the ceuler 11110 of the street, and nereasnry drainage structures unlexa such lapr�vvmrnta Already exist alone all street frontages ndjalnlug the lot oe which the Leelld hog or pnrking lot 1s to he ernatrdrted, cnlncred or uttered Shf.Tl0.: 5: 1 <rrpl Imes 1 4 A aingle -fami le residrore whore the sq,mro frot area of such mid It -••n• doe' net exceed fifty ereeur f 0, area of the rcn)drnt het P S ) of ih0 addition. rot -ton of the Ind ldinga a•x lstiug prior to e i- (b) A single - family renldrn h cr wen the velum I Of the prpposed alterations dues not exceed fifty perreut (50Z) of the value of the building being altered prior to its alteration (c) Construction of or Addltlonq to garages, earpurta, storage buildings and similar non- restdc"I'll buildings, Accessory to single - family residences where snrh construction or addition does not exceed floe hundred (500) square feet fn area. -- SECTION 6: CanstrucLlon of Public Impr1wcm,mis - Prrrenuls- 1[e to Anorovnl of the Ou.ld��ra Ot (f clef. Except an provided it feetinn 5, the Building Offtctal shall deny lastlnnre of A building permit, or drnv npptnval for occupnnev or deny final approval rend acceptance for public utility connections to ally building or parking lot until required full frontage Improvements exist, or are constructed or their construction In guarnotced by an executed agreement and rash money depnslted with the Cite. in .l sum approved by the City Eartnevr bnsrd upon one -and- one -half (1 -1/2) times the estimated cost of con, truction. SECTION 7: Construction Ager. [, Vic construction guarantee agreement shall be effective on the date of the deposit of cash and shall end upon the dnte of completion to the sntlsflection of the City Engineer of nil improvements required to be made Upon completion of the improvements .•nd their acceptance by the City, the cash deposit shall hr returnee to the owner. The City is authorized, to the event of ally default, to use any or all of the deposit money to enure all of the required work to ho done or completed, and for payment of all costs line] expenses therefore Any money remaining shall be refunded to the owner. SECTION 8: City Standards. Tile City Enginor is nuihcrlzed to establish nlnndnrds far the construction ntxl installation of nl.levniks, curbs, l:uttera, street trees, street lighting, street paving and storm drain structures SECTION 9: No Encroachment Without Fermlt. No building. structure ar parking; lot shall be crrcted, enlnrge•l of altered if it dorm, or would, encroach upon any pub em public comment or right -of -way unless au encroachment permit 1s first nl.talned from the City Enrineer, the f Englnror may grunt an encroachment permit if he determines that the encroactuuont will not be detrimental to the public Inealth, safety or welfare. SECTION 10: The Navor Phnll Flea this Ordin:oce and tine City C1crk shall attest to the same- and the City Clerk shall router the enme to be publlahrd within fifteen (15) days otter its pannot; at ]cast pace in The Dailv Bort, n newspnprr of gcucrnl rlrenlation, Published to taw Ctty of putnrio, Callfotnln, and cirrulated In the City of Rancho Cucamongn, California q7 fx U ORDINANCE NO. 64 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 64 TO EXEMPT MOBILE HOME PARKS FROM THE MORATORIUM ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE N0. 64, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 5 of Ordinance No. 64 is hereby amended to read -as "SECTION 5: The City shall not accept for filing any application or applications for director review or site _ approval for apartments, con - domini:uns or other multiple - family dwellings, provided, however, that this section shall not apply to any such application or applications for mobile home parks. ". SECTION 2: This Ordinanc3 is hereby declared an urgency measure necessar, for the immediate protection and preservation of the public peace health, safety, and welfare for the reasons stated in Ordina ce No. 64 and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. SECTION 1: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clark sa- attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the sane to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dally Rrt, a newspaper of general circulation published in Wa Ciity o Ontario, California, and cir- culated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 1979. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 16, 1979 -M: City Manger and City Council !FROM: Jack Loo, Director of Co ®unit7 Development SUDJrCT: Appeal of Director Review No. 79 -12 - Sierra Savings - Appealing the Planning Commission decision to deny the "a of a monument sign for Sierra Savings and Loan business located within the Vons /Thrifty shopping center on the northeast corner of 19th and Carnolian Sierra Savings and Loan had submitted an application requesting approval of their sign program. The sign program as submitted by Sierra Savings Included one-25- square foot double faced monument sign (Including time and temperature) , three wall signs equaling 36 square feet each and several directional signs. The Director, under the authority of the Sign Ordinance, approved the sign program with the exception of the proposed monument sign. The use of a monument sign Identifying an individual business within a shopping center is not permitted by • the Sign Ordinance. Therefore, the applicents appealed the Director's decision to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission, at its "raring of April 11, 1979, reviewed the apyeal submitted by the applicant. The Ylanntn6 Commission found that there were not any unique or unusual circumstancen attributable to the project site that would justify the use of a monument sign and that alternativa signing la available to provide adequate identification for the business. Attached as Exhibit 'A' is a copy of the minutes of that meeting. Following as Exhibit 'R' is a copy of the Resolution denying such appeal. The applicant Is now appealing the decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council for their review and consideration Attached as Exhibit 'C' is a letter from the applicant outlining their requuat. Following the letter, Exhibits D, E dpd F display the monument sign requested and the other approved signs for the site The Sign Ordinance permits businesses within shopping centers one wall sign for each street frontage and main parking lot not to exceed three per business In addition, shopping center complexes are peemitted one monument sign par street frontage to identify the center or two major tenants The applicant has received approval for three wall slens and does not qualify as a major tenant of the center. The Sierra Savings and Loan building which Ss under ronstruction, to the closest ® building •o the intersection of Carnellan and 19th Street and it has the most visibility of the business within the center. There are r.o topography problems that would obstruct the view of the proposed wall signs nor Is there any Lind - Scaping problems that would obstruct the view of the proposed wall signs. (either the Planning Commission nor the Staff could find any unusual circumstances in terms SI : of visibility or unusual topography that would justify the use Of the proposed • m)nument sign. She Sign Ordinance would permit the use of a time and temperature sign at a maximum of 12 square feet which could be incorporated into the wall signs or building design. REC @INENDATION: After review of the appeal by the planning Commission, the Commission felt that such a request is not justified under the provision of the Sign Ordinance. Staff recommands thet the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal. Raspictfully 4uboltotod, Jack Lam, Dir Cotmunity Development VIMIUM Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P minutes of the Planning Com:aisalon Heating of 4 -11 -79 Reaolution No. 79 -36 Letter from the Applicant Monument Sign Plan Site Plan Building Elevations 0, DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -12 - SIERRA SAVINGS - The appeal of a public service and • identification sign to be located at 8730 190, Street. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, : eviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division Staff recommends that the Commission uphold the decision of the Planning Division based upon findings listed in Resolution No 79 -36 Mr, Eugene Brieseecister, representing Sierra Savings, stated this project has been going on since 1977. This is a sepAcSteilparcal,of-record and contains 1 2 acres It In integrated within the :Wntoribut 9b a-ueparate parcel. They feel the way the new ordinance is written that they are entitled to a free standing monument type sign The ordinance allows up to a 24 square foot sign, the main body of their sign is only 16 square feet plus the 71s square feet of public service panels for the time and temperature. In the future, when the trees are full grown, it will obstruct the view of the sign on the building This is ene of the main reasons they are asking for a small monument sign at the corner They have to have identification where people can see the business They feel they are being deprived of a privilege that is allowed other persons Commissioner Dahl asked if this development being a separate parcel from the _ shopping center has any affect on the signs allowed Mr Lam stated the statement that all banks in the City have monument signs is not an accurate statement There are several older banks which have free standing signs; however, new banks only have structure signs Those with individual signs are those parcels along Foothill Boulevard lie indicated the • ordinance allows a monument sign for major tenants of shopping centers Mr Hopson stated in order for the Commission to allow the sign it needs to determine that because of special circumstances such an size, shApe, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance would result in a hardship That is a necessary condition for the Commission to approve a monument sign whi::t varies frcm the sign ordinance A Motion was made by Comninsioner Tolstoy and seconded by Commissioner Dahl to approve Resolution No 79 -36 upholding the Director's decision on Director Review No 79 -12, denying the use of a monument sign for Sierra Savings located on the northeast corner of Carnellan and 19th Street AYES: TOISTOY, DAHL, GARCIA, JONES, RUIPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: N07C APrl:Al. 21' PARCCL qL ;:0. 4781 - SANCHEZ - Appeal of conditions in the City Engineer's Report - Located on the ucvt side of Turner, South of Baseline P.ml Ruugcau, ANalAtant Civil Cnglnecr, reviewed the Staff report in detail, tl&, belie; uu file in tm rlannim: Division Staff recommends Unit the appeal be denied and tlm Parcel Nap approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineet's Report Chalrm.tn Rempel Asked for comments from applicant EX H11: 1T "N" Planning Commission llinutes -13- April 11, 11979 +' S3 .I -i lckmyl\K� `OYlawitssirn+s RESOLUTIUO 110 79 -36 tA RI:.mIP71(10 nF Till: RAMIIO COl'A1R910A PIAnnitPl COIIIIISSIOU 11WHOLDIVO 711E DIRECT(IR'S RECISINI ON DIRECTOR REVIFU tit) 79 -12, DE171'lt.0 711F. OSF, OF A immitrim SIGtl FOR SIERRA SAVINIS L(T:ATi21 _ ON 11'r Nl7RI11FAST CORNER OF CARNELIAll Alit) 19TH STREET MIEREAS, the City Ina adopted a nigt,ensiPlt .nmr di order to develop eonslatent signing prart Ices throughout the Tity; and IIIIERCAS, toe City Is strlvtng to create n vlmtnlly ittrartive com- munity through Idgh gunllty site planning, building design Inlxlscaping and signing SCOT 1017 1: Tim Rnncile Cucamonga Planning Cemmisslon hereby finds the folloulog: 1 Tint there nre not nnv unl,pic or nnncnat rtrrum- _ st-'"et's Of CrIbUtable to the imoJeet sif0 that umnld )-'-it Iry the use of n moniment where tlm sign ordi- nance does not remit suet n use. 2 That .ilternative shining Iv available and ndequnte to provide ne-e•,sary Identification e RUN, THEREFORE, DL IT RESiILVEO: 1 Thtl flip Rmlclm Cncnrsaq:o VI innitq; C,"jsslpn uPlmldn lice nircctor'n decision mI hircetnt RINICw No. 79 -12, in denv the use of n monumt'nt sign for Sivrrn Savings Iry It on the nort0p -'st rorner or 1901 nod Carpel Ian based on the above findings ADORED APRII, 11, 1979 PIAt(NING COIIIISSION OF 111F, PITY OF RANCIIO (:OCAII()Nt:A Itt'•_, �•;r- i r Asa• - -•- L� • s!�7 7 Ilrt man Rpm��e l'In jf au —� AfTEj)'�_ l I� T II r� tie`TTt t I tTc 1'L I 61 ( lsr.lon 1- <)Al err S I't' -4 [• � B is t ♦ � t' CLIT LYf Of 61,11 1tLtWl OPt A E"T 0 PT p r R 2 i 1919 AM PH 7181�t�1Ht�j1r2tar�r5t8 • DISTINCTIVE ELECTRICAL SIGNS q C 1' C, r:1iv -n r^r- I CITY OF Rn11ulO CUC,14OUCA C 1 _�,• i rererHSrrancr: —�. ••_,,,� APR 7.:1 1979 Asp Pat 4r8t9rM1r1111'tl t`~r31 ?r5r(i STORE FRONT MODERNIZATION April 18, 1979 Honorable City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: APPEAL #79- 12- REsOLUTION #79 -36 PUBLIC SERVICE SIGN AND IDENTIFICATION SIGN COMBINATION FOR SIERRA SAVINGS 8730 19th STREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA Gentlemen: This is a request to appeal your planning connission decision of April 11, 1979 on behalf of Sierra Savings It is felt that justification was presented in the written ward as wall as in our oral presentation In addition to our written word, we would add the following based upon your code as wall as exhibits presented. 1. The matter concerning this project has been in existance before your incorporation as a city. 2 A permit for a trailer nerving as a temporary office was obtained March 13, 1978. 3. Adequacy of signage is a necessity 4 The location of the main building with reference to the streets has been approved by San Bernardino County as well as the city, after sufficient landscaping at the street frontages and the premtses This landscaping includes trees which will have a tendency to obscure our building signs 5. Our free- standing sign is a pleasing design that is in hannony with the physical cha.acter of the environment and vicinity exi- t�P-,rr ac" 0220 LACY 9TRE F.T LOS ANOCLES. IA 00001 PITON 12101220•414t CALIFORN E ' Honorable Citp Council April 18, 1979 + Page Two 6, t re will be no proliferation of signs, even if a second free - standing sign is approved 7 Area wise, Sierra Savings leases a greater portion of the center (1 2 acres) than any other occupany 8. Just as with the retail outlets, this savings instit ution is competitive Note that each bank or savings and loan in your city now have one or two free- stand- ing pole signs ( see pictures presented to the Plann- ing Department). 9 Other centers now have the privilege of not only Iden- tifying the center but a tennant or two 10. Approval of this will allow the general public to have knowledge of oar exact whereabouts. This in turn alleviates any passible traffic hazards bicause persons • desiring oar services will have greater tme to prepare ingress savely 11 In no way will approval effect the general public, health, safety and welfare It serves a useful purpose not only for identification but as a public service time and temperature element 12. Such monumental type of signs are a permitted use in residential zones which we feel would be mire objection- able than when it is in a coannercial zone such as ours 13 Accouding to your code, "wall signs and monument signs are permitted'. A monument signs miy not exceed eight (8) feet high nor an area of twenty -Four (24) square feet There can be one monument sign each street frontage con - taining the theme name of the center and /nr major tennant identification Our sign devoted to the name is only 17 5 square feet, that devoted to public service is 7 5 square feet which in combined area can be only twenty -four (24) square feet, or place public service portion on the building 14. With the approval of Lewis Development Company, we hope to have favorable action. �• 1 r�r -«r« Honorable City Council April 18, 1979 Page Three We choose to be a friend of your city and hope to be helpful, considerate and cooperative as much as is possible but at the same time we must help our clients. This request is a reasonable one and com4s under the intent of your co-Jo. lie therefore ask that your Director's Review 479 -12 and our appeal to your Planning Resolution 479 -36 be overrided and allow our signage as requested Sincerely, HEATH AND COMPANY y' Edgene Breisemiester EB:kj Encs cc: Mr Toay Boland Lewis Development Co. Sierra Savings 4 I I 1 11 11 li Lt z �•� 1: ,y r�, — a i > j Ur 'i, �• �� i3 t � �'e ' _- ,` ;tip r � ��`�et ��' ,� � I��• 1 2. sl k-lW'S�j0 1= R7.1 I I � 1 m 1 _ p V n {,• I ` • IAN A � � �,� � � � � �.� .t �. I I 1 1' i 0 WI: ' 1 3 {G�°i �� •F I - i f L.� I al rl l a `� • , � I8 W 2 .+: Igo W� �01 Oil` yyL Y z +Qnj }� I ■ Y f.�-• I � u Y _ t vm! :jii aac U- IS r 1rii f 7!I f- t to I�r I it := t t I O IL Qai ol: �• 1 Wt 7 7 N u 1rF ill { J � � _ I •rte/• t .. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager and Member of the City Council FROM: Assistant to the C'ty Manager SUBJECT: Proposed Expansion of 01al -A -Ride in Rancho Cucamonga and Public Transit Cost Estimates for Fiscal Year 1979 -80 Last year the City Council of the authorized the con- tinuation of a fixed route bus system, one Dial -A -Ride sedan for the elderly )9'A and handicapped and 1/6 of the cost to operate' two lift equipped vans for the CO o'p /'31Pr° handicap —d in'the West End of San Bernardino County _ y� For fiscal year 1979 -80 staff is recommending a continuation of the fixed route �Y system and the City's 1/6 share of the cost to operate the lift equipped vans • to insure that the City % transnortat_i_oR needs are met. Currently cities cannot use transportation funds for streets and road-purposes unless public transit needs are met In addition staff 1s reconnending a continuation of the Dial -A -Ride sedan for the elderly, but recommending that use of the Dial -A -Ride sedan be expanded to the general populace so that all citizens wculd have access to Dial -A -Rine, service to all age groups will be a more effective use of this one sedan and will hope- fully help to ease the burden of continually increasing transportation costs for the general public Unfortunately for this current fiscal year Dmnitrans was unable to implement Dial -A -Ride service for the elderly in Rancho Cucamonga because of delays in federal grant monies and the lead time required to purchase the sedans. However, we are hopeful that the elderly Dial -A -Ride can be implemented before the end of this fiscal year Transportation monies encumbered but not expended for this purpose last year riill be credited to the City's share of capital costs for next fiscal year 61 Meng - Transit Expansion May 11, 1979 Page 2 For fiscal year 1979 -80 staff anticipates the costs of public transit services Including the Dial -A -Ride will be approximately $176,329. He anticipate that -actual costs will be available in June for Council's consideration and approval. �Vowever staff world reau ;e * th_ _ ate Council aporove,n r�ncep� udL19p }ees- -ert e- expan&i,tof the Zeprly yat in n or a ton o Recommendation: That Council approve ' "apl. expansion of the approved elderly Dial -A -Ride sedan 1` {�^"Joral use in the City of Rancho Cucamonga f*P4+x or ea -ye- Vw4se dj{Lry''11�11t�.F a VW {i"40 O,J -1� iA�� ho'i1S.- ilf A�riu+i ►��' ��' O.d� ►� � VNllt- � 4kj- d Y l�✓ �° � � &hula `� Woi�y°f�� 6 a 6 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: May 16, 1979 To: City Manager and City Council Prom: Jack Lm, Director of Community Development Subject: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CONSOLIDATED GENERAL PLAN As the Council is aware, the County has been in Cue process of developing and reviewing a County-wide Consolidated General Plan. The County Plan- ning Department has made a pre6antarion of the plan to the Planning Ccm- mission for their review and comment. The Planning Commission's concerns were focused on the hillside directly north of the City because of the environmental sensitivity of the area. The proposed plan indicates residential uses at densities of one (1) unir. per ten (10) acres of land The Planning Commission felt that this is an appropriate density given the environmental constraints of the area. • The County Planning Commission recently held public hearings to review the General Plan. We learned that as a result of those meetings the County Planning Caemiscion has recommended to the Board of Supervisors that the hillside area north of our City be changed to permit one (1) dwelling unit per five (5) acres; thus doubling the proposed density. Staff has sent a letter to the County voicing our objections to this potential increase in density. This letter will be included as part of all of the com- ments on the EIR. In order to secure that the City's viewpoint Is brought to the forefront of discussion, we prepared a Resolution for the Planning Commis- sion and the City Council for adoption Tha Environmental Impact Report does not analyze the impacts of a higher density. rho Planning Commission has adopted the resolution supporting the proposed densities of the General PLan at one (1) unit per ten (10) acres (see attached). A like Resolution for consideration by the City Council Is attached. If adopted, the Council resolution will be sent with the Commission resolution to the County Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission. submitted, Community Development JLi MV: m G3 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -43 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECARDIN3 ADOPTION OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CONSOLIDATED GENERAL PLAN {31EREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council has reviewed the .proposed Consolidated General Plan for San Bernardir County and agrees with the general concepts proposed by the plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted the City /County Coord!nation Policy for Planning Activities and recommends that the San Bernardino County Planning Coa::ission and Board of Supervisors adopt the same; and WHEREAS, it is in the beet interests of all jurisdictions Involved to coordinate planning efforts for spheres of influence and planning areas; and WHEREAS. the proposed land use designation for Rancho Cucamonga planning area, located north of the City, is designated as one dwelling unit per 10 acres and the draft EIR for the Consolidated General Plan dlncussaa the sensitivity of this area regarding developments and this recommendation is supported by the San Bernardino County Planning Staff; and WHEREAS, the adopted Interim land Use, Circulation and Public • Facilities Element of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan discusses the areas sensitive nature, its :u:cassive elopes, geology, seismicity and the ltko; and WHEREAS, selected areas within the study area may support addi- tional densities but such can be based only upon future studies that would analyze higher densities relative to the environmental aid public ser,ice constraints. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby recommend that the County of San Bernardino: 1) Leave the designation of 1 dwelling unit prr 10 acres for the area north of thn corporate boundaries of Rancho Cuca- monga; and 2) Adopt the Consolidated General Plan as rev.sed for Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: (y • S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM r. DATE: May 16, 1979 pfPm,,- W PAncIG , i TO: City Council 8 City tanager FRObI: Lloyd Hubbs, Lity Engineer WWWAI ._ SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PANEL MAP 4783 CONDITIONS Attached for Council consideration 1s a letter from Mr. Roland Sanchez appealing the Planning Commission and Engineering Division requirements for Parcel Map No 4783 The attached Planning Commission Peport details Mr Sanchez's concern and the sta'f recommendation 1.1r. Sanchez request waiver of the street improvanents for Parcel 1 until the development of Parcel 2 of the Parcel Clap. Under the provisions of the City. _ Subdivision Ordinance, this is not allowed. To grant Mr. Sanchez's appeal, an amendment of the Subdivision Ordinance will be required RECOMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council deny the request and uphold the conditions of the City Engineer's report and Ordinance Ho 28. • r R *tfu"j s fitted, LL HI1885 C1 Engineer LBH:deb GS DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -12 - SIERRA SAVINGS - The appeal of a public service and identification sign to be located at 8770 19th Street • Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division Staff recommends that the Comisslon u2hold the decision of the Planning Division based upon findings listed in Resolution No. 79 -36 f fir Eugene Briesemaister, representing Sierra Savings, stated this project has been going on since 1977. This is a sepnrate parcel of record and contains 1 2 acres. It Is integrated within the center but is a separate parcel They feel the way the new ordinance is written that they are entitled to a free standing monument type sign. The ordinance allows up to a 24 square foot sign, the main body of their sign is only 16 square feet plus the 715 square feet of Public 9 —vice panels for the time and temperature In the future, when the trees are full grown, it will obstruct the view of the sign on the building. This 1s one of the main reasons they are asking for a small monument sign at the corner They have to have Identification where people can see time business. Th,ly feel t they are being deprived of a privilege chat is allowed other persons. Cormmissioner Dahl asked if this development being a separate parcel from the shopping center has tiny effect on the signs allowed Mr Lam stated the statement that all banks in the City have monument signs is not an accurate statement There are several older banks which have free standing signs; however, new banks only have structure signs. Those with individual signs are those parcels along Foothill Boulevard Ile indicated the ordinance allows a monument sign for major tenants of shopping centers Mr Hopson stated in order for the Comissicn to allow the sign it needs to determine that because of special circumstances such ae sire, shape, topography, location or surroundings, tie strict application of the zoning ordinance would result In a hardship That is a necessary condition for the Commission to approve a monaament sign which varies from the sign ordinance. A )lotion was made by Conissioner Tolstoy and seconded by Commissioner Dahl to approve Resolution No. 79 -16 upholding the Director's decision on Director Review No 79 -12, denying the use of a monument sign for Sierra Savings located on the northeast corner of Carnelian and 19th Street AYES: TOLSTOY. DAHL, CARCIA, JONES. REIPEL NOCS: NONE ABSENT: NONE • * * k :l APPEAL OF PARCEL IIAP NO. 4783 - SVJC.IlEZ - Appeal of conditions to the City En;t Lncrr s report - t.orat,•d oil the wC4t side of Turner, 9,111211 ,1f Baseline �i i'nul Nougann, Aaclntint Civil Cu¢lnccr, reviwcd the staff report to detail, l thl,a bt•Im: on file In the Pltnnla4: Dlvlvlon Staff recuremuds that tho appeal r; he denied and the Parcel 'Lap approved subject to the cundltlons of the City Eugineer'n Report. • F• Chairman Rempel asked for comments from applicant Planning Comission ideates -I3- (06 April 11, 1979 Mrs Sanchez, stated the requirements would present a hardship to them • and asked that the Commission consider the tppeal Mr. Rougeau stated he would like to point out. that while the ordinance requires that the improvements be constructed within 9 months following recordation of the map, the time between the tentative and final map can be two years. Commissioner Garcia stated the problem that we have in this particular project Is the ordinance requirements We do understand the hardship but the danger is the precldent it sets for all developments that would come up Chairmen Rempel agreed the Commission cannot make a ceptlons to the sub- division ordinance A Notion was made by Coc,issioner Carcia and seconded by Commissioner Dahl to deny the appeal and the Parcel flap be approved subject to the conditions of the City Eng!neer's Report AYES: GARCIA, DARL, JONES, TOLSTOY, RE?IPEL NOES: NONE - ABSENT: t9ORE It s • s REPORT OR ARCINTECTITRAL REVIEW • fir Lam stated the report on Architectural Review has not been completed as yet; however, he would hope to pass the report out at tomorrow nights adjourned meeting lie stated perhaps the Commission might want to sat up a special study session in order to study the possibilities of Architectural Review. lie suggested that this study session be held Thursday. April 26th. It was the concensus of the Commission that a special study session be set for Thursday, April 26, 1979 at 4:70 p,m, in the City Mall Conference Ruon Upon Notion by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commisrtuner Jones and unani- mur.ly rarrl�d, It was voted to adjourn the Planning Core Lssion meeting of Aptll 11, 1979 Meeting ndjourned nt 12:15 n.m CO tlw Speetal Study Sosston of April 12, 1979 at 5:OU p.m In the Librnry Conference Rom R"Ivctful ll� submitted, JACK LA4, Clrcctur of Community Nvetul"ont Planning Commlus Ion Minton -i4- April 11, 1979 67 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 2, 1979 TO: City Council d City flanager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PARCEL tiAP 4783 CONDITIONS Attached fnr Council consideration is a 1 ter from fir Role gd Sanchez appealing the Planning Commission and Engineering Oiv sion requiremenyS for Parcel flap 4783 The attached Planning Commission Repo t details Ilr /Sanchez's concern and the staff recomnendatlon At this time, �e Council iiiieuld review the Issues and if it wishes to Bear the appeal, se a date fol- hearing of (lay 16, 1979. Mr Sanchez requests waiver of the street improvemen is/ for Parcel 1 until the development of Parcel 2 of the Parcel flap Under tie provisions of the City Subdivision Ordinance, this is not allowed To gran i r Sanchez's appeal, an amendment of the Subdivision Ordinance will be requlre RECOIVIEIIDATl011: It is recommended o ended that the Counc4 /set a hearing the arpeal at t s lay , 1979 nmeting / • Respectfully sub itted, LLOYO /O IIUBBS City'Engineer LBtf: deb • 1 RLS Assaci.-7fes, 610. 1 f 777 5-1+1091 A.,nv, Los Cato,. C,4rarn1l 95070 M1bphnn4 (40a) 794 6591 April 16, 1979 1 1' f '' S 1,1 11 CITY C•F IM11 -1.0 CCC /mlii!'3A AU I I IILI n.111C't1 APR 23 1979 AM r11 71819110111112111213141 SIG City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council Attention: City Clerk Lauren Hassetman P U. Box 19 Rancho CucamoncjA, California 91730 RE: Appeal of ParC40 Nap 4733- San,,hez- Appeal of Conditions in the City Engineer's Report - Located on the Hest Side of Turner South of Base Line Dear Councilperson: This letter Hill serve as notice of our appeal of the Planninq Cannission's decision on April 11, 1979 relative to Parcel I +ap 0783 • It is our intention to recommend that consideration be given to the requirement that installment of improvcflmntE�on Turner Avenue cn Parcel 1 be postponed and required at the same time that the"improvemonts and dove l0lmient of Parcel tales place This seems no more than fair since the development of Parcel 2 most assuredly will not /tak place for taro to thre e years because of the existing From thePos placed on ype of development. in the City of Rancho Cucamonga From the point of vletr safety and hazard consideration tt appears that it Would most assuredly be nt to have the developrent of te entire street take place at one time Thant, you for censido•c recaanendatcon 6e look fon4ard to making request in person g our appeal Sincerely yours, R0— 1,,,,,i L Sanch`z President IILS /ddd cc: J II, Nilson and Associates 337 Ilorth Secend Avenue Upland, California 91136 M �Y CITY OF RAIIC140 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission April 11, 1979 FROM: Lloyd Mubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT, APPEAL OF PARCEL MAP 4783 COUDITIORS Mr Roland Sanchez, applicant for Parcel Map 4783, has requested that the Planning Commission waive the provision requiring construction of street improven,ent on Turner Avenue for Parcel 1, prior to recordation of the Parcel IMP Fir Sanchez has indicated that the parcel division is for purposes of settling a family estate Mr. Sanchez further maintains that flood hazards on Turner restrict the construction of these improvements. Under Section 2 12 (f) of the City Subdivision Ordinarce No 28, the Council has fcund that all off -site irorovements be constructed within a period of _ nine (9) months following the recordation of a parcel map for each lot upon which there exists a building or other usable structure at the time of re- cordation Under these provisions, the staff and Planning Commission have no authority to waive the conditions of improvement In regards to flood potential on Turner Avenue, it will be required that • construction of improvements be designed to maintain the water carrying capacity of the street RECO:uIEIIDAT10:t: ;t is the recommendation of staff that the appeal be denied and the arc,, Flap approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report Respectfully submitted, LLOYD 0 IIUBOS City Engineer L011 deb attachment Section 2 12 (f), City Subdivision Ordinance No 28 Letter of Appeal received from Ill. Roland L Sanchez City Engineer's Report dated February 5, 1979 70 IT121 „ti„ J � -- — - ;EE3zE2 __ -1T -- , \� \ \ ] } � � ! `I •� :| !! -- -- - ,•_.- \��\ •!ia ; ,! ; • . . - .,: � - . !!!; - \ -Z Z � -- — | :! |, } } } \}} �! |!} ! }�!! m !_ ;EE3zE2 -1T -- , | :! |, } } } \}} �! |!} ! }�!! m !_ {�} E | |\ \� \ \ ] } � � ! {�} E | |\ ' C C larch 11, 1979 City of Rancho Cucamonga , Planning Dopartment Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Sir: This letter is an appeal of the conditfons of the City Engineer's report regarding Parcel lap file number 9703, Parcel fi. Iy brother, Loren Sanchez, talked with John L. Martin on February 23. 1979 and was advised that the appeal date was ex- tended to Parch 15, 1979 berause of the date that the City Engineer's report was mailed to M. IV This appeal is based on the following reasons: I. The potential for flooding of Parcelfter the improve - men's without improving Turner Avenue. noNh of Parcel Pl is very great. The tact n of a drainage syWY%_ the northern part of Rancho Cucamonga also contributes to this potential. 2. The expense of ins:allina such improver is or providing a bond without any profit or benefit teino1derived by the owners. The purpose of the request to divide this ten acre parcel that has been in the family for over ffrty years 1s to settle the estate I feel that these conditions are unreasonable and would cause a burden and hardship on the family. Tour thoughtful consideration and approval of this appeal will be very much appreciated. Sincerely, Roland L. Sanchez 322 Saratoga Avenue Los Gatos. California 95030 7a 9 C R i\ \ t:1 -1 O February 5, 1979 Hr Ronald L. Sanchez 322 Saratoga Avenue Los Gatos• California 95030 SU'dJCCT: PARCEL tL FILE NO 4783 Dear ProPerty 01.'ncr: Enclose is a copy of the C ty Cn Rineer's Report for Tentative on r,78} The Smrrovrmcos and Lrsicrd Plan of Parcel 41ap f;° re it rI rats Ire to actor aloe LItC Code City Strccts and High, and thvICLy 15. 1979 )our Tentative Parcel the No T787 If no request for a revision of the attached report 15 receive b). February a roved onLVUS'- lu'.. —�7q su }ect to will be be auto�n n Sneer s report the conditions listed in t110 City S of it,, conditions of Arreal to the Planning Commis. ion of nn)' the City Engineer's report ma)' be filed with Proovnlal•�ting Department within £Sftccn (15) days after the dace o£ np{ tom la ttn You are hcreb) notified to contact —!.-) i meat at tstc of this office for Snfermati°^ c°uccrn ng f roved by ,auditions and submittal of a final parcel map to be aPP City Council Very truly )'ours C 1,x(11 1` ivan� �t iy Engineer lit: 3ul:dch cc: 7 It Ullann L A + <Irfntcs 3fl7 Mir tfnlrnf aV19117n6 Upland. Cal lf RCEID r.•1•nt'�^ r••�n +n.rl t•P,T M'{'If•i'IImC -Ir v•l'r,.n /•1••♦•vYll:a PN CITY OF RAVU10 CUCAilU1:CA CITY CI:ma t:R'S RETORT FILED By:-,L-11, bllIM (DEVELOPER) TEt7I IMP 110._ 478] •,• ADORES$: '1X7 Lorth SC -and \M"Ic. Upland. CA 91704 DATE FILED: lACAT 10N: W -S -O -O iu race Ncrtl�nt Clmrch h'0. LOTS: 2 LECY.L DESCRIPTION:_ Portion N -F. 1/4 of N -W 1/4 of RECEIPT NO. 562 Section 2 T1S. R7G. San Bernardino Meridian FEE: 5170.00 ZONE: A -1 2ENTATIVE MAO PREPARED BY: J. H. Wilson GROSS ACAEAGE: IC ADDRESS: 387 North Sccvnd .laonuc MIN. AREA: VP1nnd. Californin 91786 IIN Of FROIrrACE: RECORD OWNER (5) ADDRESS PHONE • _Ronald 1. c,arhr- 322 Snrntnro Avenue 408 - 354 -6591 Loa Gatos, California 95030 RETORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER �® Dedirations. 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rfghts -of -way and all necessary casements an slow on the tentative map _ x 2. Dedication by final MP of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: 11 11ditlnnnl fret o" T,,Xprr m6l It flnml fort nn addltlnnal feet Ott -- - Corucr P/L ra,lua rcgnircd on Other 3 Rights of vchlcalar nracar, shall be llmltcd nn [allows: _- 4, Street vacation regnfred for: RCE20 Page 1 74 ',P TEL'TAT+VE MW NO. 1-183 Pnp,,c 2 5 Haste Plan or Streets revlalrn r ^qutred far The following Dorime[ar lntorsectlans regnlrc realignment as follaus: 6. Install or Bond Ss -- 'Improvements Prior to record ieG At time of development oC In 1 Pared E1 C Pavements 7, Construct full atreec i road+ per lot, cludinP trees and street lights) on all mprovements (1ntl uJ In curb and gutter, A. P• sidewalk, ono drive app P interior Streets Con etrust the following issin improvements an the [ollow lnC Streets: m g STRF.F.T 9, Construct All atom drain and Er.Slneer,structur. ea a9 shown on [he Ccotwater. '� iu lee- -- ar as recor- +coded by the X 10. Provide oil uag.itclephon Cale 1+ 1It`• T' Lt'''£ ti\+ rHY' IV+` CX. ICN�J[ a�t3lt�fJd ..�i3'a>,td�l'AaONgtiYT trio rover. ii • Developer X 11 Developer shall co- ordt and public utilities, utilities, nan nrcraanrye relocation o any ocessary power poles or other existing , P 12 Install appropriate street asst signs and traffic control signs with locations types approved by the City F.t hear. X 13 newt spot is ch to resh shall cars nppc +wnI of p the sCity Engen act. pad .Coact p rot drninnga X 14. Sanitory Sue and hall asst cma shall be design ^d to Cucoaongo County Water roved by the Southern Califor- DSstrlet Standards A lore of acceptnnce is require . 15. St ect light location•'t required arc to be awnew scry ices will require nn nea Edison Campany and the City of Rancho up by no 16. The following existing streets being corn up by A.C. overlay:- - eetion 17 The to llowfng nprc if is dimenatons, (1 0 col -de -sae rndlus, strcot e- vidtlm) Act Ant app rnvrJ, 18 The follow ing rx lxthB Streets are suhst m+Jard and will raquicc:�_�- MCRO': ALA % 19, under tile eSubdivirt Tloollr thnse Program athin subdivlsla l subject will be subj CCt flooding the rrovialeni of that program. RCP.20 .�1� CTCIITATlfE HAP :O 2111_ ( Page 7 X 20. Approvals have not been secured farm all utilities And other Interen:.ed Agen airs involved Approval of the fluml map Will be subject to any requlrCmcnt* that may be received from thee. X 21; PCmits ftam other agencies will be required as fellnus: ❑ a. Caltrans, for: p b. City- 0 C. Cot. •y Dust Abatement Disttiet: p d. D.l.b Trenching Permit if Any trenches are over S' deep: )Q a Cucamongn County Water District: f Other: !HAP CONTROL i __ 22. If only a portion of tilts lisp is recorded, adjustments shall be made to provide for cur -wny traffic and parking on All affected streets. 23 The following lots appear to be substandard In either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final nap_ 26 All corner lots shall have a corner radius -it the rlght -o Fvay line in accor- dmrce with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Standards 25. A Parcel lisp shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision tit prevent ' the creation of nn unrecognized parcel located 26 The boundary of the Tentative flap needs clarification as follows: 27. Oho border shall be show to centerline of existing perfecter streets, or t� explanation required _. 26 Information subvltted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the Issuance of a waiver of Parcel flap tertiLlcate, according to requirements of the State lisp Act and local ordinaneos PLOOD CONTROL Inqtall or bent (]` C3At time of Development of Prior X 29 Engineer shall t all submit ra Hydrologic 6d rc pare for subject subdivision to determine storm tuna[[ amount In major N -S streets 30. All cast -vest streets must be designed to keep storm runoff In major N -S streets. __ 31 A concrete wall Along entire north property line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets I Such flow may he required to go under sidewalks through eulvertn. X 32. If water surface is aimve top of curb. 30" walls shall be required at tiro back of the sidewalk at ell dovnntrenm curb returns 33 Culverts required to be constricted acronn streets at following locntloos: % JS other f1euJ cam rol rrryui, corm n: the w,u vt.rar_atuL ��•ieltr sh.,li ha n.- ,lu[nlna• RCE20 Page 3 tt 76 CTFAITATIVE MAr NO. 4791 � page 4 MISCELLANEOUS P _ 35. Dust abatement will be node a condition of Ssnuance of the grading remit for this project _ 36. Notse impact on this project will he mitigated .. accordm,ee with the rlam,L,g Division report on subject property _ 31 This property is not within the present City Doundar] and will require arn=ntion. _ 38. All infomatien required to be shown on the tentutiva map _So / _Ss not shown as required_ _ 39. Proper grading and erosion rnntrol, including the prevention of redlmentnclon or danage to offsite property, is / is not provided fee as required _ 40. A preliminary orAls report will not be required for this site for the following reasons: A copf of the anlls report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading wU1 be furnished to the Engineering Division X 41 The filing of the tentative rap or nprroval of smse does not guarantee that sever treatment cnpaclty will be available at the time building pernita are requested i.7,rn building pamits are requested, the Cucnmonga Comity RatCr District will le asked to certify the Availability of capacity pe =lts will not be issued tuleas said certification is received In writing. X 42. T1,e City Engineer shall crike the determination, in accordance with Section 6643b (C)(1) of the Subdivision Nap Act, ti,st division and development of the property will not unreasonably Interefere with the free and complete • exercise of any nublie entity or public nttllty right -of -way or casement and the signature of any such public entity or rnblie utility may be onitted from the final map unless the CLty is notified in vrith,g of any objection to said deteminnt/en within the specified time limits of sold Section. X 43 At the tine of Final lisp submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse eala,lationa (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or shoving original land division, t1e notes and bench• marks referenced 44, Dcvoloi'acat shall be linitad to one drive approach per street, Multiple lots fronting on a aingle street shall use common driveapproachr at lot lines, S t LLOYD IIODBS, CITY Etx IUCER By d't RCE20 rage 4 77 / Tr NTni1V E ' M A :... . PARCEL MAP N24, • �� / Y lI/\ Y.I M/uO.rl Y nrl \.OY S 1w..1..../ 1 fOVI.` .... 1 M.fl \� r•wf VY. WMUI. n. /.O.O I4 .\MiS � T..✓/ fN•.A O{ Y u/N..V ntl.' YiY I•n: I i rJnwlW wUZZ .YJ.L1Y L'!L •' .�m�i.tiwlnu..n. n�M1�r. n.J w.V�. e /r... •u.l n/u11�r L_J i Q- • p i 0.0 • b CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M MOVANDUM DATE: May 16, 1979 To: city Council L City Manager PROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SuE3ECT: DEER CREEK DRIDGE DESIGN STA14DARDS At the April 18, 1979 meeting of the City Council, the Engineering Divlsiun presented proposed bridge design standards for tetterments to bridges over Deer Creek. At that time, the Council requested that this ma b referr� M the Advisory Comrnttee f nv,rrr an a on s� of r MU. a Advisor ., ,. .. . - - review y e ann ng Commission was con ucte at their April 25, 1979 meet- ing At this meeting, the Commission expressed concern that full five foot sidewalks be provided on the bridges in "llorth Town" The commission thereGy _ requested that further data be developed on traffic and pedestrian volumes for this area. After review of this information and future land use potential vision ofr full tsidewalnksimprovements oatc24th ,s25th and 26th Streets with StreetsThis would result in 5 feat sidewolks on each side of the bridge The estimated cost of these improvements would increase total costs by approximately $30,000 Revised bridge standards are shown on the attached table Also, at' red is the original staff report submitted to the Council and the Planning C omisston minutes of April 25, 1979. RECOfitENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the proposed design scan ards as revised by the Planning Commission. Respectfully sub fitted, "L1017jl Hwos City Engineer LBH deb 719 � J h OS OO I p O 00 ON C N V N O N O O OI O >[H M M M b 6'OU au IA tD N� r N 10 � • NVI NN V1 M N H VI N N N • O O O p O 6 V N N J q C p O 1.. H Y 6 � w N O N N W SS OLLK O N b 10 m o v v yl N N N • �• W r Y t7W Z VI V1 O= hu bb b N b N N N O 0 O F D a C q N U O aN O 6W6' U?. is bFp O O Y O V V p N N N N N 6 N U Y d W 3 Q V V V M M M M M M t a K L q W U i lJ W O O Q � KOU W•.. � N � M � M fb•I O � O � N L $$ d d L C w ` Jp� u 'i in p a N N bJ3a N ad M M M M M 10 O N T d y W � W C S W S r U h 6 T;Ob O O N N N N N N O p L V W M M M M M M p N M K C W 6CLJ yl d q J q W y q d C u L d O d y O N N N Y Y Y d q dC � G O C q d O d N � b m C • C d d W 3 a C L q y J 601 i VV ps. M J Mr. Loa stated the commercial zones would also allow storage uses such • as this Comissioner Carcia sr -ted the ordinance which was recently adopted in regard to recreational vehicle parking, has a trmendoua impact regarding these types of vehicles The City has not made provisions for this parti- cular use This particular location, although not a pemitted use, should be permitted to operate at least temporarily This 1s convenient for the people living in the area. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would agree the need is there for the use fir Lao stated the ordinance which was recently adopted restricts the parking of RV's on streets This is going to have an effect on where people park There are a large number of areas that do not have an area to park their vehicles If the feeling is that there is need for recrea- tional vehicle storage that should be located in areas other than commercial and industrial, than same provision be written into the ordinance so this may be provided. The Citizens Advisory Committee was Involved with the ordinance for :ccreational vehicles and it might be advisable to consult with them In regard to this matter They should be consulted on whether they concur with a need for recreational storage within tlm residential - areas and if so what kind of standards should be developed In the mean- time, Mrs. Danna's present use could remain A Motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy and seconded by Commissioner • Dahl to refer this matter to staff for an ordinance amendment with consulta- tion with the Citizens Advisory Committee Action on Uning Determination No 79 -02 deferred �, AYES: TOLSTOY, DAIB., GARCIA, RENPM LACES: NONE ABSENT: JONES M • a k a DEER CREEL: DESIGN STANDARDS - Presentation by City Engineer regarding bridges and street improvements over Deer Creek Lloyd Ilubbs, City EngLneer, reviewed the staff report fn detail, this being ou file In the Planning Division. Staff recommends approval of Deer Creek design criteria as proposed Milman RL' pel Indicntvd there is pr,lestriv, traffic crossing thvgc bridge$ Ile stated thi+ •dteald be c.,refully eonsldeted In tegnnl to nidevalks on the brldgen, at least all one side of the street tfr Nubb:, lndicat,d It is III, opinlon the traftte voluno and pedestrian traffic Is low ennugh that what Is proposed should be sufficient Q mmltnloner R,inpel ntntcd he vnuld disagree There Is quite a hit of pedestrian traffic In Lhls area and that perhaps more study is needed Planning Cummisnlon Mlnutev -8- April 25, 1979 iMM Commissioner Garcia stated he would also like to see sore slides of different bridges to give the Commission a good illustration of the • different widths of bridges. Mr Hubbs indicated staff would take pictures of bridges to give illus- trations for the Commission as well as have a traffic count of street and pedestrian traffic. It was the concensus of the Commission that this matter be continued to a later date with additional 1nformbF?1omonvf1dawblks and slides of bridges to be brought back for review. Upon Motion by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to adjourn the planning Commission meeting of April 25, 1979. Meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m to the special study session of April 26, 1979 at 4:30 p.m in the City Mall Conference Room to disease architectural review submitted, d, Respectfully .. — JACK NM, Director of Community Development planning Cmemis<lon Minutes -9- April 25, 1979 DW F7L • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 18, 1979 TO: City Council d City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CUCAMONGA CREEK BRIDGE BETTERMENTS AND DEER CREEK DESIGN STANDARDS Attached for City Council review and approval are recnnnended design standards for the construction of bridges over Deer Creek, and Niliside Channel as a por- tion of Phase VII of the Cucamonga Creek Project The attached letter from the Flood Control District indicates that these bridges are scheduled for con- struction in Harch of 1980. The estimated $210,000 could be required by that date to be taken from nest fiscal years budget. Included in the program for - tnis year will also be projects included in Phave VI of the project including the following: COST ESTIMATE . Cucamonga Creek Red Hill Country Club $25,000 Demons Channel Sapphire Street 25,000 Carnelian Street 30,000 Beryl Avenue 20,000 TOTAL $100,000 The full potential budget committment of 1980 could be S310,ODO The District recently indicated that due to manpower constraints, bridges above Foothill Boulevard may slip in construction to March of 1981 In this case, the 1979- 80 budget comnitti •nt under the recommended program would be an estimated 5150,000 The program outlined in ALtaclmmnt A provides Lhe following: 1 State mini"" standard curb to curb widths for 6th, 8th, Humbolt, 24th, 25th and 2601 Streets 2 'lmmal sidew4IP provisions for 6th, Rth, Numunit, 24th, 25th and 26th Streets Minimal sidewalks being 2 3/4 foot ® 3. Provisions for 3 travel lanes in each direction on Maven Avenue with 5 foot sidewalks nn either side �1 City Council d City Hanager Page 2 April 9, 1979 4 Construction of half of the (taster Planned improvements for Baseline Road with 5 foot sidewalks on south shoulder. S. Substructure provision for Haster Plan construction of north roadbed structure on Baseline. Included would be footings and abutment pro- visions. 6. Construction of 5 foot sidewalks on Haven Avenue at the Hillside Channel. 7. Deer Creek crosses the intersection of Turner and San Bernardino Avenue at a diagonal and State participation has not been detailed at this time. $20,000 is preliminary estimated maximum for these costs. Policy Issues 1. Council may want to provide full 5 foot sidewalks in 'Ilorth Town' residential areas Estimated cost $50,000. 2 Council could waive substructure provisions for Baseline. Cost savings estimated at $60,000. 3 Council could remove 5 foot sidewalks at all locations Estimated savings $37,800. Recormndation• Staff recommends approval of Deer Creek design critiera as proposed on Attachment A. Respectfully su itted, t, �l1 LLOGB HUBBS City Engineer LH:deb attachment 0 'j W a a W So 00 00 • — > YCH 1� 0 0 O O 0 0 Q N r� 6UU Vl•O ry� � NN V1 V• O N O O O r N •O lD A QQ N C 0 N N 1- N N Lt � on N OLL"d �• NN � 3O� tl IOM M M M M (7 W M tl b Y S a ¢¢J t SO lluuOS O IOU V1N N O _ a a W r� a � W o O � W O � O N O r N •O lD N QQ N N N N N 6 N N � O =n � OP O M M M M (7 M b Y/I 6 1-- O H u 0 yW un �• H N 10 6 r O Q Q S N W tl N n n n N N N V p � T a � o O � W O � O OOU PV QQ N N N N N 6 N O =n OP OP M M M M (7 M b Y/I L u yW un �• N }}_ a V LL6•.. -. 6S r O N CGU Q Q E b b b b b Q O Q nW'C N L L F" r 6 W u O •".�W t� 0 0 6W1-.0 y b A 2U O_ U tl C O N O O ,1 O� oJSG N O M M M M M N IO U �~ �• aC U U U O U N A � A i pYl` O .t O m N N N N S.1 C C W M M M M • M P N N �' 6 G q _c I C l �WS W 6 N b 1(I tl I(I 1(1 I(1 yF 1(F IA b � l WNW tl N N N N Q IA � O �• L a F- n ~ L L O L N A A C y V V U O O r O 1 O U a J V y C N '•') d J d ~ W . Wl u y G a ar a Av6 a � u n C a a W N N N 0O O VI C N •"• an > O L u L qO M E L L L C O ,�`.• O Z 4 N N N S m n A •O VIC~ S S R Wo O r , i , .)r Soil SCI MAODINO dan�vinm. .no Couniy PI,dLIC WORKS AGENCY ' 7 {x�' � f7uud CunRol Ihsfrrcf _ as aau TL,a aw C. 92.15 M., OoO..aea \\ H ' December 5, 1978 File: 1 -350/1 00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department P 0 Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Lloyd Mnbbs City Engineer Re: Zone 1, rntamonga Creek, Phase Vii C/E Improvement Project Deer Creek Channel Gentlemen: Reference is made to your letter dated November 20, 1978, regarding the construct on schedule of Deer Creek Channel and its crossings The Corps of Engineers' schedule is to start construction of the channel on April, 1981 to bo ,ompleted on January, 1982 Mouever, the bridges will be built prior to the Corps of Engineers' channel and Flood Control District schedule is to start construction on March, 1900 to be completed on /or before March, 1901 If you have any questions, please contact fir flina S Ghaly, Chief, Federal Claims Section, at (area code 714) 383 -2152. MG:mmi El Very truly yours, C. J Di Pietro, Flood Control Fng)neer By B C Escobar mil' Chief Assistant Flood Control Engineer B-7 t• I I I . W %Alt nI;HIlAI'DINO - 0an(&4na 'VnoCounty P, -ILIC WORKS AGENCY Flood Cogt►ol Vistgct exa [.,, re... v..,r e«.......m.. C. 92.'; ra.."... rii:i asi- �saa-- - - - - -- November 13, 1978 I i � r 1) I'1 File: I 1 Cff f. YnCCII -050/d,g4 VI�•P City of Rancho Cucamonga DP841if OCP Engineering Department (10v L 8 1978 P 0 Box 793 All IM Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 �11sInI�11111�1112i9iQlGiG Attention: Lloyd Ilubbs City Engineer Re: Zone 1, Cucamonga Creek, Phase VII C/E Improvement Project Deer Creek Gentlemen. We are preparing preliminary bridge plans for the roads crossing the Deer Creek Channel to be constructed as a part of Phase Vil of the Cucamonga Creek Corps of Engineers Improvement Project Under Section 12741 of the State Water Code, the Department of Water Resources can Section 1274 this District for the design and construction of equivalent crossing structures for this Corps of Engineers' project These structures will be arranged for by the District and returned to the owner road agency for operation and maintenance upon completion of construction The Department of Water Resources has provided this office with equivalent replacement bridge widths along Deer Creek Channel Attached herewith is a list of the Department of Water Resources recoomended curb -to -curb bridge widths with 2 75 -foot safety curbs and railing bases on each side. Any cost in excess of this determination will be considered a "betterment" and will be the responsibility of the City Accordingly, we would appreciate having the following additional information to proceed with the design of these crossings by Rovember• 30, 1978. I. Desired betterments, including wider roadway (the City will be responsible for providing advance funds for any betterments). 2 Design speed 3 Detour requirements during construction, if any, 6 E • CITY OF RAUC1l0 CUCAIIOIIGA tlovember 13, 1978 • Page Two 4. Construction permit information for possible use in the contract specifications 5 Any additional information you deem pertinent to the project s Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated If you have any questions, please contact Mr tuna S Ghaly, Chief, Federal Claims Section, at (area code 714) 383 -2198. Very truly yours, C J Di Pietro, Flood Control Epgjneer .y /� 1 Cj.! ..c ' 0 C Escobar Chief Assistant Flood Control Engineer HG mnw is Enc v R 3 I �q "I I r Ilk I v R 3 I �q "I I 8 7� ii 2011E 1, CUCAgODGA CREEK, PHASE VII Department of Water Resources Reconmended Curb to Curb Bridge Widths is Street Crossing Deer Creek Baseline Road Haven Avenue East West Arrov Route 26th Street 25th Street 24th Street Humboldt Avenue 8th Street 20th Street or 7 Street 6th Street San Bernardino and Turner Avenue Hillside Channel Haven Avenue Equivalent Replacement Widths Curb -to -Curb •r 28' 41' r 43' Bridge to Remain 30 5' 30' _ 31' 31' 33' • Ho Evidence of Existing Facility 28' NO Determination Available . ra 64' Ll RESOLUTION 110 79 -51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION OF CARNELIAN AVENUE FROM AVALON AVENUE TO ORANGE AVENUE Whereas, the project for road improvement on Carnelian Avenue between Avalon Avenue and Orange Avenue was included in the Sin Bernardino County Road Budget at the time of incorporation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City and County have agreed that the project should be completed by the County in the same manner as originally planned; and WHEREAS, State Law provides for the acceptance of City streets into the County Read System for purposes of construction (to comply with requirements that County Road funds be spent solely on the County Road System); and WHEREAS, upon completion of the construction it will be appropriate for the City to assume all maintenance responsibility y NCH, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga requests the County to arrange for and administer the road improve.ont project on Carnelian Avenue between Avalon Avenue and Orange Avenue; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council consents to designation of Carnelian Avenue from Avalon Avenue to Orange Avenue as a County Road from the date of award of a construction contract to acceptance of the contract as complete; and BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that upon acceptance of the contract as complete by the County Board of Supervisors, Carnelian Avenue shall automatically revert to City Street status and all maintenance responsibility assumed by the County during the construction period shall become the responsibility of the City PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979 Mayor ® Attast y, City Clerk Oil CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 16, 1979 TO: City Council 6 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT MHELMS.REET BETIIEEN AYALON AND ORANL- STREET +: Attached for Council adoption is a Resolution authorizing the County to assume maintenance of Carnelian Street between Avalon and Orange Streets for the duration of the construct on of the widening and resurfacing of P, the project as planned The County has completed the design and is currently scheduling the pro- _ Jett for advertisement This project does not include signals at the Intersection which are currently pending approval and budgeting by CALTRANS. The widening project should be ornplete this sumner and signals probably not for another 9 months to 1 year. Respectfully subm ted, i LLOYD /BBS City ngineer LBH:deb am n LJ 0 n U • RESOLUTION NO. 79 -42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP WAIVER. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, a tentative parcel map submitted by James Van Antwerp, and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the west side at Hellman north of Banyan, being a division of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 1337 as approve by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on May 7, 1979; and, WHEREAS, the Final Parcel Map requirement was waived for the division of land shown on said tentati -e parcel map; and, WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequsite _ to approval of the waiver by the City Engineer of said City have now been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable improvement security by James Van Antwerp as developer; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement • and saiA improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Ranhho, and the City Clerk to attest. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979. ATTEST• ty C erk A 92 r, G' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 16, 1979 TO: City Council 8 City Manager FROi: Lloyd Hunbs, City Engineer SUBJE•:T: IMPROVEMENT AGEEEME14T FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS Hr James Van Antwerp, owner of a parcel of land on the west side of Hellman Avenue, north of Banyan Street has received approval of a waiver of a Parcel Map from the City Engineer The conditions of this approval include installation or bonding of street improvements A Instrument at Credit as Improvement Security was received in the amount of $4,700 The attached resolution authorized the Mayor to — accept this security offered for the installation of these improvement: Respectfully sub fitted, LLOYB B HUBBS City Engineer LBII deb 0 • •' i TENTAT l V E PARCEL MAP NO 'p 111 C.11 of guelo C.C"am" 3bvc A OR /s— of PA(Cl[ J of AK.1C . -w w AS ,,, A AwEd MAP (ro" /1 ML6 pl '. 1K Cs.... Al CoRPCq oPlai, eva fv el EA+ B.W.41 ✓vo' Caao4N /A APAit - /979 r I PARC EI, 1 PARCEL 2 S1u1 ia! f CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: May 16, 1979 TO: City Council 8 City Manager FRO.N: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: VINEYARD AVENUE FAIT RIGHT OF HAY Ar0111 IT10I1 r Attached for Col.rcil erecution 1s an a re in rin re are right of way maps, appraisals and acqu re the right of way for the widen ng an gnmen ineyard Avenue between Eighth and Ninth Street This is the first item of work to be accomplished for the approved Federal Aid Urban re- gional project The estimated cost for the proposed work is $4,330 and the actual cost of right of way will be (borrA by the City and should be appropriate from Gas Tax revenues Onnctrur11Qr ..s This RrR tort 111 financed 852 by the Federal Govc,•nment and 152 6y the City. Two proposals wYre received for these services and both are attache6 RECOIIMENDATICII: It is recommended that Council approved the execution of the • a tacl neaagreement and appropriate $5,500 fron the Gas Tax revenues to cover the cost Z ectfully su mitted, W41- ��" list � tYtoev� yso� . va LLO O HUB85 City Engineer LSH deb i a i��r AGREEPM FOR PRormlorwl. SMVICES • This agreement entered into this day of lt37, 1979. L7 and between the CITY OF RANCHO CU=MGA (herefna[te- called the "CIW) oral C r, E9Glfr'r= (hereinafter called the "Engineer') RECITALS: This agreement is made with reference to the foi Myles;. a) The City has determined it necessary to enrage pmfessfcnal services for obtaining right of way for roadway perpDses along Vineyard Avenue; . b) The City has received a letter proposal from the Esgfineer to provide the professional services and to be ctagznseted based upon the enclosed hourly rate schedule; c) The City desires to accept said proposal from tiae EMfmmr to perform the services required; HON. THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutaaliy agree as follows- I. WORK TO BE PERFORWD, Iteo a. Prepare right of say maps for esst side of Tfceyard Avenue between A.T. b S. F. Railway Seoth of Eth Street, snutherTy to gth Street. Item b. Perform appraisals and prepare appraisal dccammgs, Make initial contact Web prooerty owners. Item c. Complete negotiations and acgvtsitioms of rfght of tray on behalf or the City, with ccmple?Pd demos ready for City Cocncil acceptance. 0 9 -7 i 2. TIME OF PERFORMANCE: The services of the Engineer are to commence upon execution of this agreement. Items a and h of Work to be Performed shall be completed within 35 days and Itcm c will be diligently pursued to completion at the earliest possible time thereafter 3. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT: The City shall pay the knaineer on the basis of time and materials to complete the work to accordance with the attached prevailing hourly rate schedule The following are the estimated costs for the services: Item a) Right of Nay Maps and Plats $1830 Item b) ;irht of Way Appraisal 1800 Item c) Right of Hay Acquisition 700 TOTAL ESTIMATE 54330 49 Ili WITNESS WHERECF the City and the Engineer have executed this agreement as of the date first above written CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIONGA By C G ENGINEERING a HOC V L Chr stensen, President l 0 5:' CG to Government PREVAILING HOURLY RATES January. 1979 OFFICE Principal Engineer (Professional) $44 00 /Hr Project Manager (Professional) 40 OO /Hr. Associate Engineer 39 00 /Hr Designer- Draftsman 28 DO/Hr Draftsman 24 00 /Hr Engineering Aide 19 00 /Hr Clerical 11 00 111r. FIELD Resident Engineer (Professional) 39 00 /Hr Inspector (Licensed) 39 OO /Hr Inspector (Unlicensed) 28 OO /llr Field Survey Supervisor (Licensed) 39 00 /l1r 2 Pan Survey Party 68 00 /Hr. 3 Ilan Survey Party 90 00 /Hr Electronic Measuring Device 60 00 /Day MISCELLA'IEOUS SERVICES AND EXPENSES Mileage 0 15 /Mi Prints. Copying. Reproduction Cost • 10: Outside Consultant Services Cost Rlaht of Ilay Appraisal and Acquisition Services 35.00/Hr �1 26117 RO N'ATFHAIAN A %ENOF, S11117. P. • RAN nERNAItniNn rAl.1rn6HIA V24nA • (714) A24 24.10 • CG ENGINEERING Consultants to Government April 26, 1979 Mr. Lloyd Wubbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline, Suite A Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Lloyd: In response to your verbal request of April 19, 1979, for a proposal for services to complete right of way maps, perform appraisals, and complete acquisition of right of way along Vineyard Avenue, we provide the following: Work to be Performed 1. Prepare right of way maps for east side of Vineyard Avenue between A.T.dS F Railway South of 8th Street, southerly to 9th Street. 2. Perform appraisals and prepare appraisal documents. ?Sake initial contact with property owners. 3. Ccmplete negotiations and acquisitions of right of way on behalf of the City, with completed deeds ready for City Council acceptance Estimated Cost for Services For the work to be performed, C G Engineering will complete the work based upon the attached hourly rate schedule and the attached letter with qualifications of Mr .Albert Pattison The estimated costs are as follows Right of Way Maps and Plats $1830 Right of Way Appraisal 1800 Right of Way Acquisition 700 TOTAL ESTIMATE $4330 R E C CITY OF RA CCMMUhITY APR 2 7 1979 AM PH 718191pAIA411213141516 162730. WATERMAN AVENU.^., SUITE E • SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92408 • (71,)9243420 to Government PREVAILING HOURLY RATES January, 1979 OF,_F10E $44 00 /Hr. Principal Engineer (Professional) 40 00 /Hr Project Manager (Professional) 39.00 /Hr. Associate Engineer 28.00 /Nr. Designer - Draftsman 24 00 /Hr. Draftsman 19,00 /Hr. Engineering Aide 11 00 /Hr. Clerical FIELD 39.00 /Hr. • Resident Engineer (Professional) 39 00 /Hr Inspector (Licensed) 28 00 /Hr. Inspector (unlicensed) 39 oo /Hr Field Survey Supervisor (Licensed) 68.00/Hr- 2 Man Survey Party 90.00 /Hr 3 Han Survey Party 60 00 /Day Electronic Measuring Device MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES At10 EXPENSES 0 IS /Mi. Mileage cost + 10% Prints, copying, Reproduction Cost Outside Consultant Services . SAY DERNASDINO. CAytFORttIA 62 106 • I7U) M�x�e0 26V Sp, WATEMtAN AVENUE. SUrM E AIMUMT W. PATTISON REAL ESTATE APPRAISER .ESIDK,R1.L M[M![M • 985 -9681 •MCMM IM{TR t 01 X4 99T..TZ AM11.1S"$ Tg, "C}Ot�l' � see W. noel ft C $It K- •,.. uo. 714 April, 25, 1979 u.u.0 e.e,.e..M 91106 U, C. G. Fr.,gineering 2627 S. watemmn Avenue, Suite E San Bc.-utdim, CA 92408 Attn: John Stanwx APR 2 6 1979 Subject: Appraisal and Acquisition Services Vineyard AvP--M Project Rancho Owmoega, California Dear Yx Starner In accordance with your request, I am submitting a proposal for services as follcvs: 1. Preparation of Appraisals ATT&SF Property (I parcels) �� WMD 2. Riypt of 4: Acquisition (2 Parcels) • Fny time over 10 hours per parcel will be billed at the rate of $35.00 per her $ 700 Our earent work schedule will require 30-45 days notice prior to starting. For your ccnvcr&ence. qualification sheets for myself and those that might assist you are attached. Please call me if additional information is required. Very truly yeas, ALBERT N PAMS(N A14?1dm Encs 1041 •, • QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISER Albert W. Patt son EXPERIENCE Engaged in general real estate appraisal practice in Southern California since 1963 1976 - Present Consulting appraiser with an office and staff in Upland, California 1969 - 1975 Real Estate Appraiser with Albert L. Johnson, M A I 1966 - 1969 Real Estate Agent and Appraiso City of Pomona. California. 4f 4AV 1963 - 1969 Real Estato Appraiser associated with William Wallace, M A.I Appraisal experience has included industrial, residential, commercial and agricultural properties Acquisition exper- ience has included rights of way and easements of various types and properties required for public works projects Specific appraisal assignments which provide experience applicable to the Haven- Jurupa project include: 1. Gorey Avenue Underpass - Pomona 2 Central Avenue Underpass - Montclair 3. Main Street Overpass - Hesperia 4 Avigation easements and restrictions at Santa Ana Naval Air Station, 81 Tiro Marine Corps Bast, Norton Air Force Base, and George Air Force Base. EDUCATION Bachelor of Sciencc Degree in Busines Administration from California State College at Los Angeles, in 1964 Certificate in Real Estate from the University of California Extension in 1966. Completed specialized real estate appraisal courses offered by the .American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers ® AFFILIATIONS 'r Residential Member - American Institute of Real Estate X. Appraisers. u Member - American Right of Way Association Realtor Member - Ontario, Upland. Chino Board of Realtors X0 7 QUALIFICAT10N5 OFAPPRAISER RU C R EXPERIENCE Engaged in general real estate appraisal practice in Southern California since 1956 1977 - Present Independent appraiser with an office in Upland, California 1969 - 1976 Vice President and Supervising Appraiser of U S Life Savings and Loan Association 1962 - 1968 Vice President and Supervising Appraiser of Atlantic Savipgs and loan Association,- 1960 - 1962 Senior Appraiser for the California State Department of Investment 1956 - 1960 Real Property Appraiser for the State of California Department of Veteran Affairs Appraisal experience has included commercial, industrial and residential properties, in place and as proposed con- struction, undeveloped land and finished lots suitable for various uses, special purpose properties, as example: hospitals, rest homes, churches, lodge halls, cold storage warehouse, car washes, and mobile home parks. EDUCATION Graduate of the University of California at Los Angeles; Major, Real Estate and Urban Land Economics in the School of Business Administration (B S Degree, 1956). AFFILIATIONS Member of the Appraisal Panel of the Federal Dousing Adminis- tration, Orange County. Federal National Mortgage Association Classification III. Class IV rating with the California State Savings and Loan Commission Qualified as an expert witness in the Superior Court of the State of California Member of the American Society of Appraisers 0 UALIFICATIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY NEGOTIATOR EXPERIENCE Engaged in general real estate brokerage, appraisal and specialized right of wayyy negotiations for governmental 1976 - Present Land California' 1968 with of f its in Upload, 1968 - 1976 Manager of Real Estate for the City of Pomona 1961 - 1968 Senior Right of Way Agent for the City of Pomona 1958 - 1961 Right of Way Agent for the City of Pomona. Right of way acquisition with the City of arcemona for 18for years resulted in acquisition of 2, parcels easements, public use; i.e , streets and hiehands, unlit eeasemets, railroad grade separations, p and full and partial acquisitions Negotiations on Stateslf of the City of Tomona were with Cal Trans, United Pacific, the gUnion sPacificl, L A andtheAtchison. Topekagandhern Santa Fe Railroads Specific projects which provided experience applicable to this project include the White, GaralusnnumerousAvenuetunder- passes and the developmant projects, all in the City of Pomona. widening EDUCATION Graduate of Mt San Antonio College in Business Adminiatration, A.A , 1951. Completed special courses in Real Estate Appraisal, Negotiations, Eminent Domain, and Real Estate Law. AFFILIATIONS Senior Member - American Right of Way Association, Chapter No 1, Los Angeles 4 i ® License - Real Estate Broker License since 1951. Stec of California 109 1 r Q�uan. anti VA OITIM EAST SIDE RIGHTS O PARCELS OF VINEYARD AVENUB,NORTH OP 8th STREET ON Right of Way Macs Harold A. Wilson, P.E., Civil Engineer, 315 S. Plower Avenue, Brea. Ca., 92621. will provide prooertylinaZalculations and right of way maps for a foe of -'1 %5c Appraisal .Report Raymond J. Metzger, A.S.A., S.R.A.. 4848 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 101, Yorba Linda, Ca., 92686, will provide the apprais- al report consisting of his opinion of market value for each parcel for negotiation purposes for a fee of $2400. Right of Way Negotiations Thomas Guan, Right of Way Consultant, P.O. Box 697, Temple City, Ca., 91780, will prepare the necessary Written Summary • of Just Compensation, Receipt for Written Summary of Just Compensation, Road Deeds, Declaration of Subordination and Claim for payment forms, negotiate with property owners for the road easements at the appraised amounts, negotiate with beneficiaries for Declaration of Subordination, process the signed documents with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and with the title company, and process the compensation to the pro- perty owners after the easements are vested in the City free and clear of encumbrances for a fee of $3000. Title Reports Title Insurance and Trust Company, 340 W. 4th Street, San Bernardino, will provide Litigation Guarantee Reports and Easement Policies, for the six parcels, including legal do- scriptions for the parts taken, for a fee of $600 on a contract basis. SAFECO Title Company, 303 W• 5th Street, San Bernardino will provide Litigation Guarantee Reports and Easement Policies for the six parcels for a fee of :600. Legal descriptions are not included. E • RESOLUTION NO. 79 -44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO` CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IHPROVDM AGP.EEKM, IMTROVEHENT SECURITY, AND FINAL HAP OF TRACT HO.9445 WHEREAS, the Tentative Hap of Tract No. 9445, consisting of 61 lots, submitted by Rancho De Cucamonga Subdivider, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue between Banyan Street and Wtl%en Avenue has peen submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and executtem by said City, together with good and sufficient improvement security, ' and submits for approval said Final Rap orfering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City fo Rancho Cucamonga, California, as f.illows; . 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said { City, the City Clerk is authorised to attest thereto; and, 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as .o form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and, 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Rap delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. ATTEST* PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979. City Clerk --fir 0 a .j: CITY 07 RANCRO i]!G's10D0A MINORAtaUI Date: May 16, 1979 'r: City Manager and City Council From: Lloyd Hibbs. City Engineer Subject: TRACT ND. 9445 The sublets tract vm approved by the County Planning Commission on August 19, 1976 and subsequently transmitted to the City for continued action.. This tract consists of 36 act" and has been approved for pro- cessing on the SIA lira. The developer, Ranel hm supplied the City with sufficient securities, in t e form of letters of Credit for roads and landscaping, as follows: Performance: $504,000 00 labor and Material: 253,500.00 Homrment at Ion 5,410.00 'D.e Cucamonga County Later District has informed us they tLey are In possession of securities sufficient to perform their required Improvements Respectfully submitted, Lil/yD R. OJDBS, Cit j7 Engineer 1.RH:1M: m 113 Y i REN. 3U) MAP 8 2 76 OF TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 9446C IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CAI IFORNIA i Ifwl Iltll.l111.N.tIM11 J.f.J.1I •II tr IAS• .. //...../.. /.1/•.. l../I •.11 •. I/I /♦ a IY' Ir t 3 i 'llT ` nll :• 1' \It 1 • -'VI 'Jt': li fJ •f•JI ! p.•. N� rn�nwi N u r.r n. r..N.\. /...rr.n n t na.aw I'll., � G � Ir Y.•l I •�t� III r'::t;'/ `•:��_; •,• _ V i. YII. . n I'll., .l:I lJ / S.rI (. if 11/:/iYSI/I If... Ai M1•. SIYI •I. (If /11• b. L.Y•. 0= Ip l/ iX.ii/•.�i.:. I. r: •J / . .V III �IYI G I •�t� III r'::t;'/ `•:��_; •,• _ V .l:I lJ / S.rI (. if 11/:/iYSI/I If... Ai M1•. SIYI •I. (If /11• b. L.Y•. 0= Ip l/ iX.ii/•.�i.:. I. r: •J / . .V III �IYI • RESOLUTION NO. 79 -45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO IMPR VEMENTCSFCURIITY. ANOPFINALOMAPPOFVTRTRACT NO AGREEMENT, 9540 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 9540, zonsisting of 45 lots, submitted by G. Miller Development, Inc , Subdivider, located on the east side of Tourquoise Best of Sapphire and north of Banyan has been approved submitted City of theaSubdivision Map Act ofethend State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No 28 of said City: and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and s6fficient improvement security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City • fo Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows; andttheiMayorriseauthorized totexecute samesonbehalfapproved ofsaid City, the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and, 2 Security is andacontent thereof by thesufficient, City Attorney; and, 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of —_. 1979. ATTEST: 11 City Clerk f I S Mayor 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 16, 1979 TO: C,ty Council 6 City Manager FROST: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: TRACT 9540 - ACCEPTANCE 01' BONDS AND AGREEMENTS The subject tract has 45 lots and consists of 25.4 acres. This tract was transmitted to us4 from the County and has been subsequently processed to a point of completion The developer, Cary G. Hiller, has supplied the City with sufficient securities to perform the necessary improv, ants in the form of a Letter of Credit Performance (Road) $149,500 - Labor d Materials (Road) $ 74,500 Monumentation $ 3,450 The Cucamonga County Hater District has indicated that they have received sufficient securities of comply with their requirements for installation. Respectfully sutmitted, G l d f�14 LLOY B. HUMS City Engineer LBH:deb I I Cn I f 1 i s i t, •�i:l I .1 -1 , •10 '1 ?'t .uDIS •t;;) � �; I ,� 1 � i 11 11• •�I ' '• =� Q ,Et --v( x'11- 3-c= -� ' �l-7 0 7 lJ M E M O R A N D U M Date: May 10, 1979 To: City Manager and Council From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Subject: Founders Day Parade ,-nc City, was approached by Phil Kalm (Kelm), President of the and �o ands High pSchool iBand the falleof,thewith arproposal to join forces Their interest is in acting as "'host band" and providing up to twenty high a and their perform auxiliary (drill and flag corpsps)), , Cucamonga In discussion with them, they agreed it would be a big "plus" to expand the entries to community based organizations, such as Girl Scouts, Rotary, Alta Loma Riding Club, 4 -H, etc , and make it into a real community event In discussion with the Sheriff's office and Engineering Depart- ment it is felt that the plan is very feasible The Sheriff's at Reserve could man the route and provide support wuldband contrsweepers a minimal cost (if any) major to follow the parade and remove the debris. This should amount to less than two hundred dollars. S ecifics S a ounders Day Parade" is two to three a houretroutentime ,odapendingluponsnumber of entries APB TThe r000sed and staff favored rout is east on Baseline from A to �ma gi cioo to Arc a south to San Bernardino Road, then west to Klusman for dispersion ac the Cucamonga County Water District parking lot. (The Boosters had originally pro- posed 19th Street instead of Full road,cic <uressalong the rout as `p;P as it is a State Highway) would occur during parade and alternate detours marked Funding to cover any cost which may occur will be handled from the classes for eneralufund self Staff Comments s s a wore while endeavor and can serve as a base for the OP several yearly annual events our City needs to promote civic - amaraderie (4th of July Picnics will be in its fourth edition g� this year) Staff Recommendation a Autior Me oamun ty Servcca Department to cause to be cond979tedU „may a parade along the afore mentioned route on November 3, If you have any questions, please give me a call � nN /nm ® M.LwY IY. {YI J.L�F lL \I. YO FAO JA L�4 City Clerk Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, JABIN 8 JABIN wnow4c.a wT uw Lo. [oY.n •r.•xnc •oY\[.••Y U"TL4[T PARK CM110KN1A YVfa CA 91730 May 10, 1979 W-W -BU81V)es!;S •• {. eoo{ au [roan .xo •u uv Re: Alta Loma Properties Dear Sir: We are seeking a rehearing on behalf of our client, Alta Loma Properties, with respect to the application for a change ucamonga City Council on Maywhic wa denied by the Rancho The transcript of the hearing will reflect the fact that a motion was made to continue the public hearing on the zone change, that several members of the public and the proponents .� commented upon the motion to continue, and that the motion withdrawn and a different motion was then summarily passed denying the requested ;one change. There never was a public hearing on the zone change itself, and Alta Loma Properties never had an opportunity to address the request for a zone change on its merits. We believe that we have a good project, and that if given an opportunity to present it properly to the City Council after complying with all the requirements of the Planning commission, the City Council would be inclined to grant the zone change. Accordingly, a rehez ^ing is respectfully requested in order to enable us to have an opportunity to accomplish the foregoing. MJ: vj cc: Robert Dougherty, Esq. r] very truly yours, Jabin 110 i J y yb ;i Q V 'L q a � r n V w o_ o C yQU 6' 5 N C w o a o I F y W f H ro O� YI O W M 0 n n ao co r M d W f I • 7" H ro 0 M d d Q u e q M M •aa � Ur O O O NHq W a WWj W W H e H a a H wo I • 7" O MO0004040 p NNOOPt0O�00 o veyWOOm000 .. mraaoamrN N pY� T T T p Oft OONOapmh000pNmOInOON .......... rVPNOrOP NOJ NIJyIN.,Om IVI.NrNPmOY PM1NY aJNPmmTmrYmaNh w N rrSJ O rm a I y N 2 4 � S W N I f 1 y N I... ,Qrr WZ22Z' Nu�00a0000001�PY0a O'�aNmaO �' NJOm�001nOO �NNy�0000J.+Na00 PNOJ�+NPJPON «mONONSParNyl � Jrvo rry Nau. mJ- .vmrma�r� u arr r Ym YOr YY rr P a C m o E O O•LO O an = N C (YV •CW " 00 Qy4 C W2Vhw W J NW NZU W h ^Z\N 2 WnF ZW Z" m QtirVW O = 4Y Q="<C O Y�FZF- "92W Wa440 .+ NZWULL' 2r6 6r JU J/�W UZ OWLr4 WWWG w=JO 40 J 2 Mr w UGKQUUCJmUWw—c 2N 2WOWK W 6Wr02KW W2KWY.�O ON 2WyWLL4tf QQ VVIrQHOr WQSJ w"4u OI- 00y1ZWA S no J H U MY=O9N QZ 22ZW42 J 4y4yV .+206 OOQ 4 wQ2z wwy w ZW �WZ2Jr > l I i N W = H O 2 W m umm 6 O OWQI y U 0�J. I Nm~Na POrNaIwmP Or NmJIl�aNmPOrNTJU1• mPOrNTJNaIwmPp.+NTJTaN mPO.+fVTJUIapmP mTTTTT mJYJNNOylaaaaaaaaaahl�hMnrr��hmmmmmmmmmmPPPPPPPPPP0000000000 rrrrrr .rrrr aaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal 0aa aaht�hl�1�1�IwFN1� 000000 OOOOrrrrr.. W. r.+. nrr.+ rr.- Irrr.w r. r. �rrrrMr. yM.. nrr. rMrr .a.+r..�rrr.nrr.r.r.�r. -Wr�r ooa000 00000c00000a0000000000000000coa000000000000000000000000poo u 4 � 1 i f I f 1 y I 1 1 t � I i N W = H O 2 W m umm 6 O OWQI y U 0�J. I Nm~Na POrNaIwmP Or NmJIl�aNmPOrNTJU1• mPOrNTJNaIwmPp.+NTJTaN mPO.+fVTJUIapmP mTTTTT mJYJNNOylaaaaaaaaaahl�hMnrr��hmmmmmmmmmmPPPPPPPPPP0000000000 rrrrrr .rrrr aaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal 0aa aaht�hl�1�1�IwFN1� 000000 OOOOrrrrr.. W. r.+. nrr.+ rr.- Irrr.w r. r. �rrrrMr. yM.. nrr. rMrr .a.+r..�rrr.nrr.r.r.�r. -Wr�r ooa000 00000c00000a0000000000000000coa000000000000000000000000poo OOOo 00 NN 00 J.• Y Y PP mm FF 00 O O 00oc 00 Inn co mm m m mm YY 404) 00 0 0 N1 Oaw. . 00 . YY .. NN . PP . T A .. NN . NN .. 00 O O NOON FF NN YY J .G JJ YY NN Imm PP N N Nmrer rvN N N .+-. .+•+ vv vY N.•r Y' In to F 2 " F O Y Q Y 2 T O I r•f N m In m 3c 2 J .) J J Y W 6 d J J •h J H W J •J J J N W /- K .•1 O O a 9 0 O O O O O 1� 04 = � c 1- <. a a a a a a a Q h 1 1Q. W p W O O O O O O O O InF w m II • I N Q 1 Q K N N °f ou ' Czs w m a 11t1t u K ••SZ < ! � w� O Y 1 I j� JJJ LL O N 1 N W V 1 O O W K � f 1 6 S H Z wwo mSm O I 2 V V W cc W J O W PPP P 1tt1 P ; P P P P P P P P W Y Y Y P • Y Y Y J •+ F OOQ 000 a O O O; O a \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ r \ \ \ O YYY Y v v� Y m j Y v v v i rn ; 1 1 I I , W F P I V 1 I m F N W LL I 1 1 I W 2 f N Y O tIt O I 1 ..• � U I W W ? K O m j W I w . W J• W V N I W 6 I < j O 4 ti } y S O ~ Q I W S I d Q -1 w 1 I u K } V f1 Z W u I J O 0 fY -1 2 111 W LL C < a H H mom N O O C J S N O O N W M LL N 6 w z r 7NN F N U N W N' F N Z N J N 1.. J u N m Y < N x 1, 7 W 1 1 1 U 1 x 1 x I = 1 Q 1 w I O I 1 Q 1 S 1 O O o u U a I F0. .YN Q 1 -, r < 1 0 J a-1 1 .r < 1 r -i m 1 P o I o O J 1 P •'. u I o N u 1 F •+ u 1 o J u 1 } u 1 1 1 1 1 I I r. 1 1 1 1 I I } 4 0 .....V O .+ O .+ O ..1 O ,.r O H O r O .1 O M O ••r O .+ O 1- F coo 1- O F; O F O, t 0 1- O F O F O F O F o If O t t o o 1 0 0 0 o o o l 0 0 o o c A W r W W W W W I w w W W W W 1 ''' � r r w w 1 N � Yn .�., N r-r •N.1 I N M N M � • I I e X00 O O 00 JWN TT 00 C Off. mTr 00 00 00 000 0 N Oti N.-IS PP FF CID !r.r • I •• 00 MM •• TT • WT FF PP VTm WF9 N11• •• MW TT N •'O11(.W ,~ -I,.1 SS �nml 00 00 NN ,-Inl 4 • _ r, I O wrTi I V 0 O N ,p .p .p ,ap W 6 ,Fp •- O O O O 1 � I i a a a i a I � F i ` ac •� a a a a W} s 0 0 o 0 o ✓; f jJ 0 r r i Q 6 I W 1 1 I s I I ww KK I I : i fl y 6 Z J I K =� a w o m o a j ;} �, K I C fLL N t W = f 6' WY• u u D N lr.H7 , W O N I 0 r Q V r V ' w IJ.Q S I 1 oG W W 70 4 mOC N Z a KLL V W W W I H r C6 m 2 1�'• JO S m K1Y J I{ 1 P CP P P I P PP FF P F 1 P F F FF - F I F NS Q v I W J � Y S I v SS v G 0 •� o .1-+ o o I r o 00 00 0 0 0 00 0 vv v v TT v v o' v va v v v � I N i I T • _. O I W y O TP y ,� p 1 • Fp O 1 ,O Vp p I O 1 0 O ..1 O I 4 P • 0 m FI v V T ' r m r r IFIIY F O NN ,5 ' I m I 0 0 1 p I1 � • it I V W « 'J V I••' � YOW l , W QQO Q O Q f p •Z• O r = W Q 2Q I V O O 4 !- j; N O PP} N u N W Z U N U NT J N r N W N N NN 6 N �) 1 O 110 1 = 1 1 I >> I O 11 r• 1 W I O 1 Q 1 1 Z 1 J 0 u PMu P U O LL O U O V 00 2 N 0 0 0• N W ov W P 1 �•+ I •+ 1 N O u N 1 YN 1 NN01 1 + .0 I N I N 1 1 1 1 1 1 O N O O O O O 0 r COO- o r o r 0 1-. o r r 0 0 r C,o1I,O r o k] 1 O O O I M U O O O t O O O O ti� W L W � W W W W W W N N N '1 1 N N N •• m N N 1 N N r I N // .�., T I 1 I1! r,• • • A 1 4 • • ♦ 6 • • M1dY00NmO N O O ONNYY 000 I WN, 00 f 00 00 GO minmP00 PO N O O erI PM1P NNO PN•+ 00 1 mm 00 00 • •.pNOlnm r •• a JN O mm 0 0P0 .11P nYri +Y Y W MY CIO � N P I ~ I 1 I I I I • I G 1 1 YI N M1 N M1 m P O N N mmmmmmNN m m 19919.1. 1- O M W m O U O 0a oci 0 I 1- a w H N ^N '• 00000000 0 0 a 0 O O I I I a 6 I 6 6 Q Q 4 4 C 4 I f x � W 1 N •+ II U N ww I WJ >� I tQ w: Z U-8 CC WJ a 1 ZaS u I °uu =W • ZZ C 1 Ww QO, 6 i 00 NI 1 I 'IL w u \ NJN1 I r lit VI I O ww.•I wW VIW E O 0Uu Z u m I .IhPI WY OUI I 16 O JJ 1 W J S �I 11 it as m.II-,1 S .�'EL J• = .ESW 6 iW O POOmr Ou YW .� '"•' d 1 _J K L' ww4uwuw U PM It 00 I I x ~c, -uxwo U WIw OD W-) 10 6 1 00=~-fOvI Z JIl1J LLW OZ 6 u 1- •- a0....1 -a a wmw WW Zw J m J ZSSP.2L' TO O F. -II-•• mm —0 2 I r 1-• Z 1 � I I I I fll I s I I t J•PPPPPP P PPP NP PP P P P- P M1M1M1M1M1M1M1M1 M1 FIT. M1M1 I M1N M1 � !� A M1' NNNNNNNN •O YY YY < I W Y •� •� r-1 000 000 00 I 00 \\\\\\\\ \ \\\ \\ \\ \ a \ \ \ NNNmmmrlN N YYY YY 1_ I NNE U ' NN 1 7 I ww Z I i i OO r Y Y t t � A• ♦ ♦•••• iI 1.1 1 a 00000000 O W I 1] J i n aaaaaaaa m o o -' x ananaon.d > a J ♦wU wwww♦ •I I V m w m l > E > J 0 � m J m L ~I 0Y 4mo J m w. W. N Olt O YY N I a H a N J Its N 1 NNNNInNNN O N Z NNN N a.n m NN Q N C Z O ry J N O N w 0 10 14 1 Y .•' O V r00 III 00 O. m 0 P I IL O S O x ir x P 1 =oNaN0 u•.- r.•NNN 1 N 1 Inwt 1 .•I.•1 1 ••1 0 u 1 N I •+ 1 ..• 1+1 1 II I 1 1 U t 1 .1+111.1 a O r O 0I0 O N Y t 0 N O - 0000rr. r• 0=0 1O - 1- 010 00 > 0 O FO 0 r 0 o O o o E o u o 0 0 n I N N N N N N N N h N •.I •+ C ••• I 1 I 1 �• _ O • 0 • ; • • • • t s ", • • o • ♦ ♦ o w a ♦ w w I Po wtivl oslen oo w do 0 1 0 0 0o a d oo I G� y Y+YI off 00 mm �.+ 00 O O 00 d d NN .'�'I�cp OP ONw OU ff •.�•+ NN O O PP O O ar ( se' O O O N pp. n n I N O O O p O O O O O O O O O O p I < a < I 1 t R < < 4 a 4 Q Q I I 0 1 1 i I • m 1 I t I s i VLIw•tJ X O j I Z M ' � I I ' I I W W' Z r M r I rl ' ..�• 4 > cm fla O Q I O 21 �GC J O t7Q 6L .+ Q0. Q LL U ' y w 0OP0 P P PA P P P A P P P P \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ fftf f d fd 4 d d d P d .I v fff� f f ff f r f f n r n r t 1 ddC)f N OPrP 2 d n N v U2ZL1 Y O 2 y � N N I I N . U � i .! • N W I ' I Q r y, ✓ y r Q 0 Q K •"• Q y Z O 6 W Y fQDf W O Y P mm O P ' T r d 4 N 4 n 1.1 J m m IdY Q O Z NN Z P N N C N N Z 2 N O N 6 N O // a X 2 0 / J/ 4 1 1 O 1 O 1 1 U 1 O 1 1 1 1 Q 1 /VJOO O 0 0 J PO J P J .t i N Z O Z P Z N 0. N ¢ N 1 .rMes / v 1 1111 1 1 11 / / 1 1 1 1 1 1 r o.,...r.. o.. o.. o.... p.. a.. a... o.. a.+ a .+ o... o.. r o00o r o r o r oo 0 o c o o a o a o o a o d W W W W W W W W W la W N N y y y N N N y N N N �� :0 • • �: • ! 1 •: • • • 0 : • • • • u .r l • � � 0o 0o 00 lo= O O aOPN M0000P Wav 00 0 0 00 00 NN PdN N N WNWNOFNOOPON WaN 00 O O PP 00 NN OFW �• N WPPaJ•- ,OP.'•+PW W.rO NN � j I as NN WMN rl •••' NNPW.+wN aT,ti M rav .-..+ MM m P '•NNNN�•ti r• O ti .ia •o 2 j • P � F a \ z I v Q ' = v N a F N N W P O N N 6 P P P P m S P P O M S W W a a a a N W a a F .• W G Z O 0 O O i O I O O O O I ' S �- 1- /- F 6 I ' � 1•• F IY N • I � I I r S W I WW C vN SOFa N 1 O 1 O ON HrWN aOm Om S O O , LL2 W Oo Pd'nF NOa f Q V 6 Y 1!= N 00 NQFF OOP N2 T K V T FQ Z• 11 1 >WONCIW J U U 7 W U I 2U W 10 41N0 TN F W O 6 x W U aaW NI I W NOI F4 4 J V ' Q I Qd' NNN >I•'mM. -,W.wm PO 2 I W ; S•r J Y }NQJNNaWYN I V V V d N Id•KrSamm o mmC RMIJ r H� J J J W O �'•• 1 •fl••'HHM' -I�h M. P Q 1 P � P P PP ' P PPPPPPP• /PPP PP P P F FI F FF t F� rrnnnrn"FFr nF F F W v I v' v vv a vvvvvv . v v N F O O O 00 H 000000'i'Ja0o ao 00 O N Q \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\\• \•. \\ \ \ o v v •r vv m l vvvvv+ vv v m , t aaNN NNN FN W ' O Nr00 000 NN U v NNNO Owo Ov OWV Pv O I PN 1 a vvOV vON Ov > •'• 1 mN E v MRION NWm N.Y ;M MMNN MOM NO v vvaa vvN NO u w Ix I u l I • r '^ J Q e 2 W N 2 � •+ W � I • V 6 W •-I Q K S 1¢ � W S w •LLn f 1 uLL.. � U d 1d• 6 Q F J P •Z•• N K N 2 FF F P F NNNNNMMNNNN H Wn1 V a N C 2 J N W N S N U NN P p NNnnnFFNNNN ;N O N N N • o D l O 1 V I II S I O III IIIIIIII ° 0 1 0 1 P N O N as N P N FFPPPPPODOO N 00 N O N O 0 O V 1 N 1 .+ I N 1 00 N K O .Id O rll O ,.1 1 „ II 1 Il illll 1111 11 1 O Mm O ..• O r O F O NNNNNNN O F 00 .r co Y• O 1- O k u o 0 0 •'W1 J L ' � .Nn •Nr � , N N N w h Y •�• W • • 1 mm �O.D O'• � • dry I � O O NN .+ : NN mm O O 00 0000 0000 00 00 000 N h dQ wb.l NN O I� O 00 YN OJJ NNM Q ,O dm ^� O O YY YYN! Ino�n rm OFr r r r~+y m r I• 1 • P { 1 \ J S 4 1 1 I O \ 1 z W F r � O W G N F N rml h o j}yQll' o o s f I o t rs O I O W O O O V 0 z a I W PPPP F P� I W > I Q \ 1 J J LL! Z NNNN C 1 ' l.Ni.N r1 , ,N-1 1 I ( = JO M1rhM1 vWi M1 1.1 co Y OC ( N } I I 4w ' NN HHHF I I 7 H I mm VIZ W h I O Q zzzz 1 I 1/1 UUUU WW Oln } Y N > m' UUUV I I zJ W O C 1 >Sj' I I I ' 'FF M1 I F h F hFFF I I I M1 M1h F I I JJ I O 0000 i F V 00 00 I N l O O O O I m r 4 r J J JJJJ I I r I JJ YJ I S, N i 1 I 1.1 � O A U1Y Y I O It\ OF It10 ON ON M1 h I JJW Y , N U mmmm " } N � mmmm c h Y. J U 1 ¢ m V mmmm Q F V m H .1.+ F JN ° N N = O N N i 4 N W NNNN OC Z W N W N I 2 ^I U N 1 J N O 1 I I F 1 1 1 W j N M1 N w1N00 V N 0 N PP w h NO 0 O V I I A7 1 1111 I I V 1 11 O I I O ' O H O N O co o0 1- 00 00 M1 0 0 1 M1 c 1- 0 0 F' o w N • s • • • • • • �r • • - • • • • • J 1 1 � W CL • I 1 • s ♦ � .� 1 I J o° 00 S 1�.. 6 M rrl fJ v O W F " • A 1 1 I , 1 1 1 I 1• M a W 1 � r I J 1 1 � W CL • I 1 J S 1�.. 6 u• m O W r " • 1 1 1 I � 1 � 1 ul t ' K � � 1 1 J I z � I I 2 _ z�a� � W " N I - 2 I 1 P 1 .• 1 O i• ' , 1 u I w 11f �• I I s ww o o o ' J 1 a ; I W ~ " w K 0 u v r 1 n S u 1 1 � 1 1 1c a 1 J S I I r i v 1 1 1 I � 1 � 1 ul t ' K � � 1 1 J I z � I I 2 _ � W " N I 2 I 1 P 1 .• 1 O i• ' , 1 u W r w 11f 1 I I s ww I I 1 1 f i 1 i r 1 I i 1 r ' 1 I I r I 1 IN w 6 P n v O \ H Q O l • I vi R t 1 t o wz 1 1 1 XLLCC 2 1 � j { N Y S u W r I " I z ww o o o ' a I W ~ " w K u v r o n 1 1 ! 2 O •T ~ v u z , 4 ° z • I 1 i I W i ' I 1 I O z 4 z .+ O I M 'O O n I 1 LL I O , I Y H • 1 I u I { I I Q I N " • 1 �r, I0 / l �� ! 6 1 t Ir Pe e.14br1- .trM1re dl .Mu e.... urn ............. . .. APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSES) 1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSEIS) FILE NO. • r•' C7 ':,L'J Gs:! ^Io1L iCDT,FC i1:1 .°'<' :Tulle rce3 Applied under Sec, 4011 Effective Dalm- Lfjiancn For Deportment of Acobolic Beverage Control 1213 O Street Seeromenta.Cold.95e14 -an 8nrnnr: }iaa ' °1e "' "•• ^I ^ °'^�•M1eY The vnde,gned hor fool o.,, t Iw 6camn das<nbed at /olbwp v TEE NO. CODE GEOGRAPHICAL CODE 'G1, Dore Issued 2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S) Temp. Permit Effwl'o Dater Harold N. Derma' +v I ?,: rosi_en• 3 TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE If -V.v DLDCy.1D1u:Cr F.icbnrc: ;t. i'.O'Cert'.Vicn -i r-en. .c : ;u'e Occco cur Per to Per ?50.00 TYPE =+8 _ COPIES MAILED Add. Ucense Sea (Pow. 181.50 _ Name of Budne, ,i IIre :leD.l Ci ?a S. L"Otlen of Bminest- Number end Street Proa to area ' ^ ^� �.. ILAlY lee 2-eC.s77.170 anted 100. ^0 c�•1 Jn:xnliIIn ?nncry o �:Pceaonra 91 l:1 :.L^! u+ unety .!/RM10 6. if Premise, Licen,ed. RECEIPT NO. y TOTAL � 51. 0 Show Type of license Done r• AM Premilee ImIde cyD h7 Yen 8 M I Add (7 different from S) Number and Street Ir...l rror) _ : :i. <uClid UPI , CA IM ??b Tc ^n 9. Mors you ever been convicted of felony? 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic L corporation Beverage Control Act or regulations of the Department per• tubing to the Act? n0 11. E.plain a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 an an otmchment which shall be deemed par of this appGcwion. Wtt. Applicant agrees (a) that Orly manager employed In ao•lale licensed pramsses will have all Ile quohfimoons of o &enwa, and (b) thol he will net violate or cause ar per It to be violated any of the pr e' of the Almhare Beverage Control Act 13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Can Beima di310 Date !020/79 - VMx rwlrr N e..Mr..M Mr .M. x xva w r.rx 111 N. Ir M .'NL.x.4x I M .ee-, w«e M M Ir MYvme,NN N yMW r M.. nm.N W r Iw w WIM N II M lIl Mr.. r4h .. N W . r r w • M rx vIrrN. e rMwr.r. ov-. vvvY m xvN nl Wr .. ery.w .n« Ilr. M .ply.nr J41 x.rW I!i .ltl ' fvM r wr MwNI N M ..M+rl•. r .p14.x. Mr4rn N M rwrNd W.r IM Y..rl.l Ir .N.\ Nr yN4xN. N .slx P M <n4w v pv.n.d p..lx 1. wr N Nn.lr M pry.w« N . Nr r n MFII .. ,rrw.x nNn! Np yr. Ihn Nwh 1.01 M ....rM �' .l^ M Ir NN ..h M Ov... r e.. W Ir rrtM M nl.r r r M N +h e . w...lrrr. 1.1 xn'h .-I. x.r N .Md.... N NMr M NNirr x M. Mrun .NA w. nraW L.4GN N so e} �' L '1 �14NIYifEE �I� ri1T -.! (t :TIT, 1:1C. 2n� APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR 13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of 'rr, Dnrt:nriiro Dote vv • `, .1 .r..r,. 'e'\ Mrr x..v JAM. exr \N.. rxeM. W r.N III IN N M W--, r .. ..wxl...4..1 ev .r«r... W.nrn. xw.lx ...IV.rlw. INI ..ry1rN N r1..LI. M1w.lx .ryl¢ . r .. yr 11 nl M se W.\, I.Mn .sNL.Nw N .wrW.r .4 I.r.r... N M .....MI WwN.I M. n-1 Wl.r W N Inyl.r .«n N M w.e.wl w'r W..i.. Nf.....e w n.. vvex .Ymwy 1 .y eeM..nee M W.xr. III MI M M1r.lry .w4v,W r Mq..M wrvlx N M .i.. ^.n...rxN .NeWrye.rN . nw ww Itw .Wn 4.. "M M .n . - .14 .r- .0w.r, .MH) I .r.M W 1. r Ir 'Yvv r 1. 41M M W r p ew MNN . Ix . N.n e .IW r. Wn....r1A .. nNNiM %vuu" r. M M1.pr.n..l 16. Namo(,) of t+cemee(s) 17. StgnelureIt) of lkemee(,) le. llcenn Numbers) SOI:n a. DZ alln _at:•icin a. rlvn 19. Loco,;.? 111.lumher am! Slreal . nr• 1.1 ^nn City r and Zip Code _ ul// Ceun y v - -xE8191yL�l�l•�14 6 no No''V""c Berate This Line; For Department Use only Altechedl Cl Recorded notice, t' 0 Fiduciary pope,, 0 - - -- - - - - -. _ COPIES MAILED ❑ Remms,l. Fee of _ _ Pafd at_ _ Office -RecelpiNo. CITY OF RANCHO CUC4:1ONOA DATE: March 26, 1979 TO: Lauren Nassernan, City Manager FROM: Jack lam, Director of Community Dovolopsnt SUBJECT: American Planning Associatir California Chapter Meeting The Acerican Planning Association is t - professional planning organization that serves to keep the profession abreastof 'State of the Art' In planning. It's annual California Chapter conference with It's them of Planning Policy Through Implementation is bail conducted in San Diego, April 29 through May 2, 1979. Since no cectings other than the League of California Cities conference was budgeted this veer, I am requesting authorization to attend the APA conferoggC. Anticipated cost of this conference is $200. Please advise as to the dispo- sition of this request. 1 RespoctfUPy submitted, Jack Lam �Dlzector b£- Comunity Dovolopmnt JL:cc Y J I M E M O R A N D U H TVs City Council, City Manager FROM: Harry SmpoY, Vnance Dire r SUBJECT: That& Cable T.V F &ea pursuant to Ordinance 1231 of the County of San Bernardino, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is entitled to the franchise fees collected by the County for catle T.V operations. The fee, according to County Ordinanco 1231, is 2% of gross receipts Theta Cable Television has deened it equitable to pay the City of Rancho Cucamonga 5% of gross receipts Reason being, it is consistent with what they are required to pay our neighboring cities of Upland, Ontario, and .4ontclair. However, we can only require a fee of 21 of groea receipts pursuant to Government Code Suctions 37354 and 37355 which in essence says the legislative body my accept or reject any gift, or devise =do to the City. The City my hold the devise and dispose of it as prescribed in the Cairo of the gift or devica, or if no terns "0 spelled out the legislative body my put it to use m it Bees fit. It is recoaeranded that the City accept the additional 3% paid by Theta Cable T.V. as a gift or device. 0 r'- "r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: April 4, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager i From: Jack Lm, Director of Community Dev . Subject: CONSENT C!.LMWAR Please set the following items on the Consent Calendar: 1 Zoning Ordlnoncc AmendmenC No. 79 -03 - City of _ Rancho Cuc®onga - For public hoaring before the City Council on April 18, 1979 2 Zone Chance No. 79 -02 - City of Rancho Cucamonga - For public hearing baforo the City Council on April 18. 1979 r l �J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHCA MEMORANDUM Date: April 4, 1979 To: City Manager and City Council From: Jack Lan, Director of Community Development Subject: CO:SENT CALENDAR TRACT 9131 - Release of Cash Bonds • 1 Cash Bond - $2,000.00 ' Temporary Occupancy Pamlt for 1 Class "C" Office - Lot 8, Tract 9131 Southwest corner Citrine and Banyan 2. Cash Bond - $150.00 Temporary Occupancy Permit for 1 S41cs /Constriction Supervision Office (Portable) ' Lot 7, Tract 9131 Southeast corner of Banyan and Sapphire Owner: Sagewood Homes, Inc 18003 Sky Park Circle, Suite E Irvine, California 92714 NOTE: The Planning Division has inspected the above and finds them acceptable for release of the cash bonds. if the Council agrees to release the bonds, the Planning Division will for- ward this information to the County of San Bernardino, as the bonds were made out to the County. Reipectf IT submitted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:MV:nm ' r Mr Michael Valrin CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P 0 Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Tract 9131 Your cooperation In this matter) Is sincerely appreciated 'i: n).. ro 1 Sageeood Homes would also like to re -apply for a sign bond EitT ,..C:,,. , • :.: , . ,,. ,1 • \,, .iv.,•.,i,, % <'•.. '118191 •'`�' i`k��''� ••' ' r Mr Michael Valrin CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P 0 Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Tract 9131 Dear Mr.'Vairin: j •� a '"� +"1 w'� T =J i••'`•� Please consider this letter otr 'request for the release of the following bonds: S. ' , t A r,t, •1 Temporary Occupancy h: rmlt for 1 Class "L" Office, Lot 8, Tract 9131, SN,rl7rner Citrine s Banyon, Alta ;, • "• �' i,,," Loma ; r ` Cash Bond: $2,000 00 ''1;, 2. Temporary Occupancy Permit for 1 Sales/Con struction ^• °,' ",'��i- 7 ".'i.� <' <' 4'j;Supervlslon Office (Portable), Lot 7, Tract .9131 ui� ';1i''vr; '.w.''r'•iLy,:�l Your cooperation In this matter) Is sincerely appreciated 'i: n).. ro 1 Sageeood Homes would also like to re -apply for a sign bond EitT ,..C:,,. , • :.: , . ,,. ,1 according to City requirements. \,, .iv.,•.,i,, % <'•.. i`. Again, thank you. , •e ,'.. 1 "• .Sincerely, i 15%b \, March `. i' 'i 23,•1979 S/AAGE DEVELOPMENT,;��, �� Dear Mr.'Vairin: j •� a '"� +"1 w'� T =J i••'`•� Please consider this letter otr 'request for the release of the following bonds: S. ' , t A r,t, •1 Temporary Occupancy h: rmlt for 1 Class "L" Office, Lot 8, Tract 9131, SN,rl7rner Citrine s Banyon, Alta ;, • "• �' i,,," Loma ; r ` Cash Bond: $2,000 00 ''1;, 2. Temporary Occupancy Permit for 1 Sales/Con struction ^• °,' ",'��i- 7 ".'i.� <' <' 4'j;Supervlslon Office (Portable), Lot 7, Tract .9131 ui� ';1i''vr; '.w.''r'•iLy,:�l Your cooperation In this matter) Is sincerely appreciated 'i: n).. Sageeood Homes would also like to re -apply for a sign bond on the existing >` ' �;,1aj %�• on -sito sig. Please notify us as to what steps to take to have this done according to City requirements. \,, .iv.,•.,i,, % <'•.. i`. Again, thank you. �� .Sincerely, "• �,.` r'c S/AAGE DEVELOPMENT,;��, �� /NOGD1OMESS,,IINNC,/SIH � `'V �NII15 ♦iV —ti J :� �t��l� ' tll )bur _ ' ♦y: \:i ;•�� Vice President ♦•,;.i ;•. :,ii, l., -• , ,t �'� Jt: '. ,.v t r�S3} 11i':�;'k -: =ti' •. 1 1 8D(13 SKY PARK r1nrl r / m11Tr r• / In,nnir rA M7,A , MA1 qr7 QAri ' -urr/ Vc.ctVnao,o W4'MT1'•r.• Temp•�OPpcy Pormlt for'l' 3661 Spruco Street Class " C" Offico; Lot 0, Oerport Beach, CA 92660 TR 9131; SN /cor Citrine R Canyon, ALTA LOPA. APPROVED: 6 -6 -77 R -1- 20,000 -T 83 -61 EXPIPES: 6 -6 -70 Cosh Bond $2,000.00 Cosh Rocolpt 0030815 of 6 -1 -77 To Cnforcom�.nt: Inspection: Actlon: �-- - . „ � ,�., :1 ,. J�:..f_. -.ri - lr J�./�, 1't �•'Iilyj4�SCllT� fc Gn (•}�.,�=}.r.,...r• , •�•�. 4� r*nvsl�a�:�,lt� H V 'Y,'r'. ���7w,Jyn)�j. :.. 'rte rte�,, l!��:}}t);j1�'•G'.i%�'.il.` "•l :LtA�iir"Aft '1Z - •!a)' �c'k' zlNdJ r•'••�• l`,.•r ' 4Lk3ril::ii1NJ3�.71r re!i�a {F�p r / :g;. .Tat p;! 2Lt1 *l•i%h!� 1,Jt�i i 1 I i; :L'1 i7C: J-01"r -'C rf1. '!"?'i` ^rcrn•. 1•-r,t l: •n- t 1....1 5">•=L Strome Sales 0MCC /Con:t. :.: w•.•r!LLCt <t; I:•r;•,rt CGamp M, 02660 (J'ort%,Jh) Idt 7, "" ?,Jl• 8'Vcor hanyn.J r. S:.rrl:Sra < ; u'Y�Yr7l11t 7- 1'✓- /! ALT.% IIXIA R•1- 2n,C70•T 7J -61 • • • -..- ,r,t'a,/ •. Jj rAPlRL3, 1 -10.77 ..• ............._ -. •v,�,.' Cash '' Bond 1160.00 Oisli hccl :rt ':u. 275571 of 2••11.77 1 ?•�' r To Lnlozro•wntr Ina[•ceGlonl ACGJ OIL I •', h� \� A. • wet �m �-- - . „ � ,�., :1 ,. J�:..f_. -.ri - lr J�./�, 1't �•'Iilyj4�SCllT� fc Gn (•}�.,�=}.r.,...r• , •�•�. 4� r*nvsl�a�:�,lt� H V 'Y,'r'. ���7w,Jyn)�j. :.. 'rte rte�,, l!��:}}t);j1�'•G'.i%�'.il.` "•l :LtA�iir"Aft '1Z - •!a)' �c'k' zlNdJ r•'••�• l`,.•r ' 4Lk3ril::ii1NJ3�.71r re!i�a {F�p r / :g;. .Tat p;! 2Lt1 *l•i%h!� 1,Jt�i i 1 I i; CITY OF RANCHO CUCK40MA i Date: April 4, 1979 To: City Manager and City Council From: Jack Lm, Director of Community Development Subject: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9226 - Release of Bond - Restoration of the model area • Lceated on the north side of Sixth Street, approximately - 494' vest of Archibald Owner: John D. Lusk and Son P.O. Box C -19560 Irvine, California 92711 Bond - $1,000.00 NOTE: field check use done and restoration of models have been completed. Respectfully su itted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL: nm 17._ - J0194 D. LUSK & SON • uoan a wx toss r.+rxr rx ayowus nm m A. r.r.. P.O, r wrw, ►.rr. u WD • a:a m+nr wn r J Nardi 20, 1979 Mr. Michael Yairin City Of Pandw Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucawnca, California . Our Mr. Qairin: Ps: Tract 9226 Band SCR 702 -58-4A �i • c-a rf�i)�il -1 Lizi -0i9 i,i6 91730 t Pursua::t to our conversation of this day. I have enclosed a copy of the Fond w discussed, and a copy of ay February letter to Mr. ll+rtin. Your assistance in obtaining the formal release of this bond at the April 4. 1979 council meeting will be greatly appreciated. Yours very truly, jam 0. USX RID Sm •one si Pierre Subdivision KNOW ALLI.IEN BY THESE PRESEIITS Thal .e LUSK/WALTOI? CUCAMONGA. a partnerabip Ihe:mrwmer ca.iri Rrc . a!' a: En pi ani FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY v rml>o<mmn ma„rted ani de_q tusien, ur der ai d l y ru•.e c' Th. la.s of the Sri., c -Ca lifornia and duly Lcensed he 1M yv,Pe:e of mohna q=aveamm ce tr• cam" sole surely uMn tends m u denalTnas uam.d or vulhcn:H by The laws of the Stole of __California_ .oiled Surely) m Sorely. are Mid ani Lrmly bc,nd COU1;TY OF SAN BERNARDIN9. —_____ _ he,emolter called Obb.,cl a The Iml nrd •:' One Thousand and No /100 -------- U.11m, ly 1,000.00 _ Lnw1,i money el the Unded Stmra cl Rnen ^a I:r The gymenl of whmh weld and holy to k mode we Mreby Lmd eurrebn aM cur e-� .a:h cl ur suso.m ari m:.ass r._'ly a,d .....ally Wroly by Thu. F+vsen1. THE :ON'"HONS OF THIS ORUGRTIOU AVE SUCH THAT WHERFAS the said Principal has entered into an agreement with said Obligee in connection with the construction of model homes in Tract 9226. NOW, THEREFORE, if said Principal shall restore to a dwelling unit each andel bee within the tract including sidewalk restoration and fence removal then this obligation to be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. • in WITIIE.'•S 'JAIERrOr : 1 R -^ :. :-d •, 1 .- vo, h,.. r nu..l Anl rrr.nb la h. duly ^'nn -d n,d seated Ru day of _ _ June B SKIOI�TOti wSMIs op apna Porto .,hip By. ' — Vice—'rWdent = -_tary FIR PAN' FUND INSURANCE COMPANY Hy`zr� . reyy. . 1 . GENERAL FORM Bon v.S'; 708 58 44 Premium: $15.00 i 11REMAN'5 I a....a..,,.......ra_.... .u..r. ae..o...•e.. ata AMERICAN ..,.a...a.a.e.... ............... INSVIT ..eFl.uu..al. KNOW ALLI.IEN BY THESE PRESEIITS Thal .e LUSK/WALTOI? CUCAMONGA. a partnerabip Ihe:mrwmer ca.iri Rrc . a!' a: En pi ani FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY v rml>o<mmn ma„rted ani de_q tusien, ur der ai d l y ru•.e c' Th. la.s of the Sri., c -Ca lifornia and duly Lcensed he 1M yv,Pe:e of mohna q=aveamm ce tr• cam" sole surely uMn tends m u denalTnas uam.d or vulhcn:H by The laws of the Stole of __California_ .oiled Surely) m Sorely. are Mid ani Lrmly bc,nd COU1;TY OF SAN BERNARDIN9. —_____ _ he,emolter called Obb.,cl a The Iml nrd •:' One Thousand and No /100 -------- U.11m, ly 1,000.00 _ Lnw1,i money el the Unded Stmra cl Rnen ^a I:r The gymenl of whmh weld and holy to k mode we Mreby Lmd eurrebn aM cur e-� .a:h cl ur suso.m ari m:.ass r._'ly a,d .....ally Wroly by Thu. F+vsen1. THE :ON'"HONS OF THIS ORUGRTIOU AVE SUCH THAT WHERFAS the said Principal has entered into an agreement with said Obligee in connection with the construction of model homes in Tract 9226. NOW, THEREFORE, if said Principal shall restore to a dwelling unit each andel bee within the tract including sidewalk restoration and fence removal then this obligation to be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. • in WITIIE.'•S 'JAIERrOr : 1 R -^ :. :-d •, 1 .- vo, h,.. r nu..l Anl rrr.nb la h. duly ^'nn -d n,d seated Ru day of _ _ June B SKIOI�TOti wSMIs op apna Porto .,hip By. ' — Vice—'rWdent = -_tary FIR PAN' FUND INSURANCE COMPANY Hy`zr� . reyy. . 1 . 1 i JOHN D. LUSK & SON A YIMIlt OF 1N1 [Ol[ FAMILY Of CO4.ANII7 17SSa GM.lb Au, Irv:..IndJla :.i C,.nau • AO a,.0 ISSSa, I,dro.CdJ.9PU • 17111 5a'tl73 • ( ^)I February 16, 1979 i'r John Martin City or Rancho Cucar,cnga P 0. Box 793 11ancho CUChmnCa, Callrornla 91730 Dear I•s '•:nrtin: Reference: Tract 9:.6 We unierstand that the e•drl area that er.1 t.i in tract 9226 has been acceptai in the field by City '-f hanch-• Cucsronrn represestatIve7 (Inspection heli In r,0- inetlwl with road incpecti.n for tract 9315 ) C,)-,I I S. 1 plrnse process the release :r 1,ni CCR 709 53 44 that w.•s I eted with the City to insari restoration or the ❑cdcl area If ycu have any Saectionu regarding the above request, please contact the •mdersimed Very truly years, LUCK IiCIAfru- ONTARIO a division of JOHN D I.= R S0 ;1 .Tone f• it -rrr fubdIvision I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 To: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR Tract 9274 - Release of cash staking deposit of $4,450.00 Location: South of Foothill Boulevard and Nest of Hellman Avenue Subdivider: H. J. Brock b Son-, Inc 6767 Forest Lawn Drive _ Los Angeles, California 90068 'TOTE: alltfinaltowummotsThavesbeen settandnheEhasnbeen paidcin full. 21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9274 - Accept roads and release bond located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard and west of Hellman Avenue is OWNER: M. J Brock L Sons, Inc. - 6767 Forest Lawn Drive Los Angeles, California 90068 Performance Bond (Road) $172,000 1107E The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improve- ments include curb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs. • 2Z Sr[Ei d ne � YA[i! C,,Ov OF SAN bc"-KIM) TRACT N0. 9274 etw • aW�vaa. n • NN*ov a •a'a t. a NO • •ccl " .0 aIeG m n Am O CKAw <• vwt•uNl .ua tl eV u•e R :%.x! •. Pvl, 10 n .-S. e•ct •• v rNt serf V i.[ eov.r. mcr. a St* tpena Y9JMV. 011 ANWAR ♦,C % It ASSWWtS, �Mt•atb a: '•occ BOUNDARY MAP AVreS S a`•'.i ui T az r • we w 1 T 'a IS t! I to I; 13 \4 ,77 v.O'( StioyFao E }a ar S a`•'.i ui T az r • we w 1 T 'a IS t! I to I; 13 \4 ,77 v.O'( SPA _ ..— ✓. -✓� i`��rr'�" i4 -J m Ad K 3 C �• I� 7 t c c �, • I r m lei TRACT t:4'ISGS , ;. It i tAa57/G4 -Gs �._ �i • t 0 i StioyFao E }a ar , Gpr �V SPA _ ..— ✓. -✓� i`��rr'�" i4 -J m Ad K 3 C �• I� 7 t c c �, • I r m lei TRACT t:4'ISGS , ;. It i tAa57/G4 -Gs �._ �i • t 0 i Ti�r ♦F.—'T SPA _ ..— ✓. -✓� i`��rr'�" i4 -J m Ad K 3 C �• I� 7 t c c �, • I r m lei TRACT t:4'ISGS , ;. It i tAa57/G4 -Gs �._ �i • t 0 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9280 - Release of bond Located on the West side of Hellman Avenue at Monte Vista • OWNER: Bob Jensen Builder, Inc. - 226 West "E" Street Ontario, California 91762 Performance Band (landscaping) $5,000 NOTE: 1t isareccommendedethat hissbond ebeerelease therefore, lndsapin d 0 24..t! ■, {N IM( (OONIT Or SlN (L NY I N 01.0 OEIW ISSOCIUIO'i. {SL(M, 6 o I, ,= 6 11 N6± FIG( 16• SUMS `r,Mi( IS S!i10 Im -poINO CWY CILIi GYIi S'll,wL•s Ym(s �..T�... rc� .. r„ .,.W.x,,.xl,xx.,x...n•rl..lr.x. 10.I Yw'uxly ..W.1.. xuurn.IW W '; G:CxY.,,", Wr, I.Y Y,�..�. W ~; ^•:,'xrW W x. YYYN. rW.W WNx,n Y. xN'.�� ... n•n it W o-wY 1.•n. • r, r,I rr.W��,« .r. WI"1 ..T rl.•Mrw na. 0 '• • lo• __ t °.6x1 Y..:.r L..xu:w.: " + ",!:' • e 1 r , n., x 1•NI r Y.nl l,uxrMl P• . Y.. . •..... ...... • �1,•N. ' Y' ' r• •^• ��t ,I 1p F{.rll W YuxlrN rur. N.r.W .W..v _ V 1 `n •u•.. i i " • IKt: .Y 1 111 wn..nr e..?r iii: •Y i "ur1.�n IGrx Wt IOr f IULi It NI�w..F 11 1•N � u .t I9 i ° y ! / u aI 1,b •_. 0 -° " - ry .J•x'• - K 1 .A x- . • ,x'� '-1 L l — - N -etrrh r •!' ^ �.! - - al - .-. •�1 4 • 1. .' ' . wr•. D'•.: 1 .� " :�nj I 1 Y � L3 'N WY i • .6 r k"�NLL1 . o 13 `•f�• AY.yE jl L j 0 ' II JD 1Q "Q 1 i `el„IiII N: i( W . t .T iu. tw !L a .i N-' � J� , _ ~ a P'3 � � .1I 37 16 31 ( 24 26 1 � 39 i2 23 44 y 27 v s 1dD � .� -� � I i 'DIY 3 q I • . "..ice:- cs'..69 R c1;� C�-aa u.a :6' o C F 1 •.awn; - •r:.n ^a r, u 'Yiir W i ti aT �,�o-!,y._ E•. �� 2Z / iv If .:� "� r. •'ir. /+� `.•/ SSn•Q�Yt; �`•._ .�:vAr —df. -� .. -- 1��1 fr I LL; FS .,a L.� 3- `�',f • 13 12 l l C 10 s 1 ( 17 J Z 16 Y� :•C : Y l6r �' S i ! 4! Q 1 n. °i •.7.nN'� 1 , j j• •n. 1N, YiMx� M �• O C6 62 �. . 63 75 t t• Ss '4 `gyp- 7l1 A, a u• y 75 :r ryl b uD `Q, i 74 SE I L51 W (D eL .n� si �n, I C!ss.P• o' a e y G 45 ^ y Q' S2 59 j e 67 e a - • P 44 iil `! 53 50 'a5 I I aLJt s t 68 43 54 C 57 IS . i j I A t t• o 7r \ � SS R i .z•1N R 3rvn` L _ "•t• I``: S• - ; :. ` .�. } \'� ! i +^. '[ 3 r. '[ 2 �: 1 �N a u• B ' 7 N 6 5 5 i 4 yr• j t i { f 1 1 j +ii•, I , O. i. Il I `7 O 2 / II Y I AZr U' MO. J� IVCIM.95 ".4 C y VC..I, ix IN( COUNtt Of Slx I[9x, 90i N0 OI14 l 4A31 NISICN a l I 1IN Of l01 S IICLN i[ CUC,NOxC, NO•ISIPO ,S10CI111N 11 IKOMSO IN 6CCN C Cf NVS. I,f{ ,S 9(CMS OF SAN ...%&,IN0 COW[l. mire N[, 4! Q 1 n. °i •.7.nN'� 1 , j j• •n. 1N, YiMx� M �• O C6 62 �. . 63 75 t t• Ss '4 `gyp- 7l1 A, a u• y 75 :r ryl b uD `Q, i 74 SE I L51 W (D eL .n� si �n, I C!ss.P• o' a e y G 45 ^ y Q' S2 59 j e 67 e a - • P 44 iil `! 53 50 'a5 I I aLJt s t 68 43 54 C 57 IS . i j I A t t• o 7r \ � SS R i .z•1N R 3rvn` L _ "•t• I``: S• - ; :. ` .�. } \'� ! i +^. '[ 3 r. '[ 2 �: 1 �N a u• B ' 7 N 6 5 5 i 4 yr• j t i { f 1 1 j +ii•, CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA MWORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO, city Council FRO, -4. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT, CDHSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9295 - Accept roads and release bonds Located on the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Seventh Street • OWNER: Socaland Corporation _ 864 Town 6 Country Road Orange, California 92668 Performance Bond (Road) $100,000 ROTE: accordance owithutheoRo dsimprovementvplans and ni i it recommended that the roads be accepted. The improve- ments include curb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs. • • [TRACT N0. 9295 W iML fNNid W[ � Op/Tlx[[ MIMCai ONE. C<•10f01:11!T�MC "I M 1Y i• [ COWTY�O.YU V1 �.D' uON OI[i[ a IM A -•f .= Ox Tx[ •. Or CDU- uow Cfxll Y A 1 u N<[ECO n 000% • 0. xNi.xGC S, N Trt OIJKC OS THE COUNTY x0.0"0911 0. SAID COUNTY TIKWS O W<UICNSx xCCNSO BOUNDARY MAP -C Art2J MAl[ROAO • j� / r / .:rw GAY +-�••r .4�/r. w••wI • . '.-. ! •/' M w r� 0"+w'/.! /Nlf ./••r/.rw •rlr i C P - r CIS yr/ yW IJ wJ fO Ir/yi/M 1 It ;: � •T1. t;• I I �Ij i�Y I3•t I I I 1 1 / r / .:rw GAY +-�••r .4�/r. w••wI • . '.-. ! •/' M w r� 0"+w'/.! /Nlf ./••r/.rw •rlr i C P - r CIS I �`LlnIN IT wl/ wl �I•D Im pp yr/ yW IJ wJ fO Ir/yi/M 1 ;: � •T1. t;• I I I �`LlnIN IT wl/ wl �I•D Im pp yr/ yW IJ wJ fO Ir/yi/M 1 ;: cirA/c'x CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR i TRACT 9302 - Release of bonds ri Located on the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Lemon Avenue • OWNER: Vanguard Builders, Inc. 9211 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Performance Band (Sewer) $34,000 i Performance Bond (Water) $20,000 Note: The sanitary sewer aid water systens were approved by the Cucamonga Comity Water District on March 5, 1979 i • 2� . '1~ R AL .N (.WWCORPOPATEO T[RRlTF?T Of SLN BCRNAR011!O COD.7TT - BERA7 A SUBOMSION Di COT 9 Of TwF FOOT po, PL� -`JLE F :i-K lRdCT NO? AS PO NAP RCCDRDfO iY 60W' 20, ;R Tl/C COZ, Y Of ,SNI BEN•':ARO•'ND, STAIC O° CLJfPf•' /!A SCLCC !'l 6d APR2 /9// !/.'C✓OfdSEN fNWNEER! /.G CO wYl. • � • Y I Y l Y'..P � • l ., •••� Y�i mil" wiY�I ✓I.•/!Yi•.y, •nl •..knl N.Y.. ✓; Yl✓Iiiw+ ✓/'•r✓•lI /�I• ✓� ' •• rr,. i t�N.YI w.In./MI../.I I.F�r•f..✓•I✓Ml ri�Y nY ,. . NaY ✓ MI � t.I rIO� ✓ ^YY M q.nry F.•.IM Y/I ± ril errl M,✓f /tN y� l✓ Y ( .y./. Alts., / ✓••n.iwrWA iMY i.Y ^•i Ili.i..MUgI ✓. •M..MSI'•YI wY. ✓✓„ Cr. r+r..li...�r�l ..�..we.s Y r.r ✓n I ,. .. l.Y. Y r•� .rY t�ri nv v,iww lni:i, run � ✓ YiqL TPACT NL ISM =J Wc Lee to v /'}•^9 6i r $�V r_!I ��� P � y i w�.I'il ' . tai -r {iI ":.. /Y I ��i i.:n /I'M•✓ � 1 � %YIi% �if� I tJ tI != td n • 'I It •}tl��T>�J�'1T r J yfa;�aa c w6r _ .- -✓,..Y ix_�t 7 � b i f tP 2.j /➢ 2{ /t j1{ 4 1� � r{ r l Y ,� i 'y .. �t n=om- �� Y ' ✓8 '4 t'� x x r u. pt IS alb '. Jr.,T r � !'!- �.Y�m- ,• ��� 2 t x BRr570. i L 4..%f;�¢ CA ^ ✓L � r( fn gg �'�//�J b t..� I 1 w _J� �nI• W :x— f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO, City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALEtIDAR TRACT 9305 - Release of bonds Located on the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Monte Vista (YWNER: 1100945 Jones South Street P. D. Box 1178 Cerritos, California 90701 $43,000 Performance Bond (Sewer) $50,000 Performance Bond Water NOTE: The he CucamongasCounty Wateroistrictt oneFebruaryv9. 1979. E 141, JIA 10 30 921 It J14 4 2F 1 5 lit is k i ;,3- Ilk a 4! 1 V.4 1 M 24 cl 0 2 t It It 4) --- CC In P41 a HE FiiF. -i-i Id 91 lez\ Zz Iz LDVI!.L 8 T 4 'a 'GE)d 6ZI 6016 f e *9 32, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: city Council FROaf: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: C09SENT CALENDAR TRACT 9313 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the south side of 7th Street between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue is OHNER: aTown Corporation and 860 Country Road Orange, California 92663 Performance Band (Road) $78,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement plans and t is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improve- ments include curb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs. Ll A'd 1 -r2 '7J -77 1 .hiin. y �I• i�PIc B� I J it ' 1 � J Down nn. 1 A J S T I'll, J i / An .I'fiNT I a Y I�..T�W �IIII r i n rr I M I 7R4C7 A2G HG /27 / 73 -C: wY,Ii O I'llw CIlJ'Wft" 0 Nl0 }RfI r IJ; �YiIJ }RP•tl J}JFIYIH .R,J} 7 .. a ..'3 J_L nur wn- J/t'!fl snrJwir>a L \ i Js /s. TRACT N0. 9313 BEWO A SUBW,SON OF A PORTM Or THE NORTH 014 -MALE Of THE SOUTHEAST ONE - QUARTER 0* THE NORTHEAST ONE- WARIER Of SCCTIDN M, Ip SHV 1 SOUTH. RANOC 1 WEST, LAW -; _c"WO WERMIAM,N TML COUNTY Of SAN BERNARD- - - W0, STATE Of CAEUMmA, AS 5NOWN ON THE YAP Of CUCA- MOMCA LANDS, AS PER NY RECORDED Of BOOM A OF MAMPAOE B, W THE OFrKC 0' THE COUNTY RECORDER Of SWD COUNTY THOMAS 0 MCCUTCHAN RCE$690 BOUNDARY MAP I SCALE r r•m - 1 -r2 '7J -77 1 .hiin. y �I• i�PIc B� I J it ' 1 � J Down nn. 1 A J S T I'll, J i / An .I'fiNT I a Y I�..T�W �IIII r i n rr I M I 7R4C7 A2G HG /27 / 73 -C: wY,Ii O I'llw CIlJ'Wft" 0 Nl0 }RfI r IJ; �YiIJ }RP•tl J}JFIYIH .R,J} 7 .. a ..'3 J_L nur wn- J/t'!fl snrJwir>a L \ i Js /s. I J it ' 1 � J Down nn. 1 A J S T I'll, J i / An .I'fiNT I a Y I�..T�W �IIII r i n rr I M I 7R4C7 A2G HG /27 / 73 -C: wY,Ii O I'llw CIlJ'Wft" 0 Nl0 }RfI r IJ; �YiIJ }RP•tl J}JFIYIH .R,J} 7 .. a ..'3 J_L nur wn- J/t'!fl snrJwir>a L \ i Js /s. wY,Ii O I'llw CIlJ'Wft" 0 Nl0 }RfI r IJ; �YiIJ }RP•tl J}JFIYIH .R,J} 7 .. a ..'3 J_L nur wn- J/t'!fl snrJwir>a L \ i Js /s. i ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9314 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the southeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Seventh Street • OWNER: Jahn 0 Lusk b Son - 17550 Gillette Avenue p. 0. Box C -19560 Irvine, CA 92713 performance Bond (Road) $168,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement plans and it is recmmnended that the roads be accepted. The improve- ments include curb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs. 0 3S I iarvi RE S. "N `� -� 9 314 TRACT N0. ?] t0 Y'[N� nx CCONpNO TTO N N.NGC) vlST NI SINxtl,o TN[ Y11 Of [UC"'No. UNOf.M 1NC ..... TO PN KN• NT CORDED M 01 CMIONN11.11 Iic NI..... CT 1f[ or COUNT SOGN N..CC S Of YL.f.M lnt OIIIL[ CI TNt tQM1T I NLCONOLN 0I PIO COUNTY TNOUIt 0 Y[CUICNfN NCL Soto V BOUNDARY MAP )tot I•TM Ac 4 5r. af,iaoto _ — a C nw lr =1 ��� s�a1f n S�niY Y e x�ji ��• N�) �� Y YIY tllnl. f N ..,04] • R TRACT NO. SA54 ma. 651 5, -W SmCtT 2 V 0 "LEIS JWTM)' I S A. I� I O 0 ,J i ann b • S QP ! TRAL.T i NO. ,.Tr L —Cc S�nN 'e,ateT •.Y[".•,. n�YLU 1•,Ny�l '.C.T1)i di YI islwTY:v •�\r n nro.• ] ' \iili:ntii })rot wrtn n».Yt n//)u N.[u ) vw r nom• \Y V.I'Jtl <'. .`N Ylr nrlY.V r'MY•SY 1 l'Y'r TAY LLY..:IYI'I411)\InMM ^.nY.'n 1 11 �'• \�N' '• \•i L• lF1!I YILI) nY!��1 )'n rY !LNY • • rnaC •:InKIY'C)'��J'a. G.Y,� •1.1•T•.l• :Lx". S [. -r. L f \. I.wt.L-Y J IC4J:N .tiTS Or mvn ...ou •1 . \•I� �V YLI•�)1 alit Yt0 + "• — — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 T0: City Council FROM: Lloyd Nubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR Tract 9321 - Release of cash staking deposit of $3,700.00 Location: North of 19th Street and west of Sapphire Street. Subdivider: 1260 West Foothill Boulevard _ Upland, California 91786 NOTE: aertifna�tmonumentsthalve been indicates n s+ full i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9321 - Release of bond Located on the west side of Sapphire Street at Highland Aver.ie and Alta Loma Drive 014NER: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. - 1260 (lest Foothill Boulevard Upland, California 91786 Performance Bond (Landscaping) $18,975 NOTE: The landscaping req.,rements have been met, therefore, it is recommended that this bond be released. • 1 i,. TRACT 1 s.ur oar • 1.117% r 3 a -• I - 1L IN( c 0 u m I I C G 0 t k I[ .4( a.Lna. CAWOtm �J1111 KII(I I RMIIISIN OF SIOR11C6 V IOIS It [•J 1 KKSI[N aSSCC1alI0. tl G([TCit ]G 5::1 t O yt, [[1 -[ Ot[O Q SK mntr tf Su ynJaOIW SIM OF [a.l +L -•: a 1 SCALE I% go* �� -yt• 43 x'42 .( +k j ke 35 1•k 34 cY 44 fit•''• • ,�J / r 1 •s 1�' �t �• ; ••'!r^ • . y • .CGS 41 /� " .• b 33 ti : 23 pt. Vii. \�• -d•.r •4014 •'.-r - Ylj x 32 t 29 ® 46 ,} �• 38 •37 Cj oIIG IS {f` • 39 < n k 0X3 30 p • AIL ` 47 =;,• lC •',�•.',(r- •r�•I� . �~ F �Y.�.. ` __ 48 �— L r � jVi.� •% � 15 • 16 A G� IB v4 19 n I4.�.• x LAI ��•4£Sk.1� 5U `Y =i4 I'1 3 t 12 tc II IN t!• , I ��� VI � al v It CD in 58~ E 59 hi,C sl [ k). °•�'.`• 111 �I .:.< s7 x 60 d Of 53 55 .,...,.,.....• !' � � , � ...tom =_ 1.111 . O[ a "9111, "9111, tG IR C. Lr rf� NO. 9321 .......Tie lucl•Ittl MT.1 O. C1111O1M1 IM T.0 CCY.ir 9f SI•. SF [11101 M0 , �I• : 1 SIU- +Iti3101 [f P1211= p an tf Rv^ It [R:J 11 [L:R'rJJ M:wfRi:, tSSr11i1C: L' II:T�] 1'• StCI. C G t:13 tAm 4 PLC= K iK C,a, K U%1.: i:a•t S -1•C V CIO. -11 I A iOF iGE S.-ALE vl'. SO' Go t. E •� sl � 1 ' l •p It 33 t2 26 ������' -'i,� 25 tZi _2 © 1� •R �'�- it 32 j 2 w .c' i Ji�� i � r..� � .R r• I I i- I, - 2 23 e i a S �r l[Td ~iii ��1'•1' r t ;n M IB i 1; 20 != 21 W 1=l1 HIGHLAND l EN 9_ •s^ rll� �- t� _w•.tore -�+li - r..:�YO �y 1, _ �•{�J r_- � 0�.%t- tiJ^ f 0 I 'mar. e. . R 1 q. v: {'4 --�` -- _••`•^•••w I I �iw �.11� r- . W ST �2 _ r Ilk 69 e � r- sties n� a l�i 64 It 61 62 63 T _� R CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR Tract 9322 - Release of cash staking deposit of $3,650 00 Location: North of Highland Avenue and west of Jasper Street Sebdivider: Lewis Homes of California P. 0. Box 670 - Upland, California 91780 NC.r: Certification from L. H Noreen, Surveyor, indicates that all final monuments have been set and he has been paid in full • • �I TRACT NO. 9322 .,WC1;;� teIGK S Ie 1M[ cOl•,ir Or sit sttOttol,e WARIO,e FWNIA all S L701tiilw O t 1Vitiw rt let t ARt Ir ctv Q A Mum tSSecitll!, is temp° lr M [ R W% t1Q is tt[L%= O iK [OAa O Y, 3mmm SIAIE cr catumt, ■ I ful• `I••C -mAc7 NO 7070 crTRINE STREET VIA SERENA wf r,rct aMr°na °rrrriMn 1 n, rY .•ir{/�ro 14 sa I -ar - — t —•rte -- 69 66 0 67 66 66 64 63 62 O /d 7 a� t . 9 I6 19 � I� .K ' S iG 6 17 6" l S :1 9 OZO _-V 6 - � w a ` 3 1G 1 id 7 a.�a • n Tpa 1 .� — Ct 2 11 [ 14 • , S _ r� 1P.1— t• t .1'.�.e s_ -- af�1__ • - t :u• 2 12 13 $ t K 24 - n tf 4- S TRACT NO. 9322 swcT ASSOCIQ[0 [k,cm4t [ IM1 IM[ [OYN 11 01 SIN ,[t M11,01 M1O aNL I AlJIg310t G I gltlbl 6lCi a lLK[ N U[LOO I OxLMq dL110wMA A MItI ISfttllllb. 13 S1C07I] Ix {q:l 6 Q IYCf IvL K ttibVf R IN LO.VII 6 SY SiwlUlra fNl(6 C4UD0111 I e SiW � Y.AY � I A TRACE No 7969 SHAD SiREE7� a"'^ CAMEO STREET 43 �I/ U. r tit %I1LF 30 1 29 D I 16 Id:. tip. I -ORANGE ..+++Mi��� -�_w :�__ --�� STREET —� . 63 r, 62 61 60 59 59 57 5666 1 W .r) p I a 5r .rn I unw M 1 I N _ e o 19 -, • 54 Iil rn ".4. 30 31 e' Q t 43 s "a. .6P ' I 4„ a 29t .j 32 Al @ A[ r 53 1. ���YYY IIr��(((II t •�� �` d i 21 t 20 La�1 F 3.7 m a 52 � W U _— 22 27 y g 3A 3w AS U si 'I 7 m F . T r 'Ly0 --� •t[�ar 1 1 a rx �� .I � po- •� Z3 C. a[ 36 47 s 6o vll• �j x. _ f In 4t ._ _ ,tl '.1 ,{• 36 37 • 48 43 v Ii N �..r µJr —nom lYil4. v.a �@• -p .�. as ��"- -" T / d �.. ? 1� wr, SLn•0•tulw mn Y _iM:t"�•- - :' — AYENUE - w NIGNt-um _ — 1 1 - w e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer sUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9353 • Release of bond Located on the southwest corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue OWNER: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. - 1260 West Foothill Boulevard Upland, California 91786 Performance Bond (Landscaping) $8,728.50 ROTE iearoetm been therefore, tisecm endedhatthis bond be released. is F IxtIT 2 or 2 1xIITt '1��T1 O TRACT 9352 •, 1\ . ASSOCIATES Ixolxlllf _ IN IN[ CODUTT Or SAW /EIS N ISO I xO Onrbp. GWwp SAM A RWITISIW O OW1184 W 1015 I W S OLCCK tl pL110411WE- STEW ASYLIITIOI AS QCOED IN m C Or xlrS. ME NC MOVES W TlE ^w� Coo, W Mx OESN ja STALE W CIEISWNII a ` IJ • =Mv .'W eA :" ZZ.' L .1.Y:: 1 t��. (STATE MNY POUTF� 30 r"`"" °" rr 4 u'^•- S E4 •a.__F P e•.•.rnn•l 1 , y 9 10 21 TA• 22 r 23 1� 34 SS ` MI I I re' 6 .,n,.. .-�. � '� �; -°..' •.® it b• .Y II •� 20 ® Z n. 24 33 }�37 f > ,.' ! •�6 It .r'jiu .�i^.•'� »' Iz 191® ' ; Q 25 32 , 1�`•r' .i 38 If j T� if CA I e 1. ) 3 toE Q T31E 1� liY >Ij I9 \ ®1J 26 39 � 3; 31 \bl'j0 S I 1j 'll ��' inn Er7 14 tl 17 9 Ak j'yg�„r�7 �t 27 :r 30 IjiW! 1q 40 A. �t 7C..•Y: l @ IS j 16 Q 14 28 4 29 ! v u 1 L_ 41 1a - 1 MIGNONETTE el "" ""� •I^ '• STREET W �( !; bail t 1 T SO 49 1 48 47 i ' 46 j 43 !Y 44 43 j 42 SWSTTW'S MI[S �xrr eArA ^f1•A » •G'L>= 2 A 1 I r M\1'�ilwnwr4 n""irFi \.NY rp ED N ♦ n'M \r \Y N N M.r3.,M•,w;\1 \ \N• I• rN'! ~M•"rY w\el\M 11111 \N UrIA n IT • ly v Yn•N Iw• gR r. v.�• ^rl ^: i4...... rurl,.1 Nm rr Y\nN ° N nnnr Yw u,Y,llr. wnrvn.w mwrinl. Yt. 1Yw \nl. w.lwnr (tA Y• nYw nx• u.w ' 1 1�w r Aln1 Y rtl4 YlNrll I \.1 Y n r1 Y M.N O Y iru ~•Iw1rn1 w M rwlrl urlm. .� V' •.Nr • 1 \r O b r11R.1 n1U. ° V' wY'N NIY 1•N [.le nl rvw llMrA l.�1n. N N•T' NN' UY 1AIJ. • Iw Vr11 fY111 w1.1•YY rwU rN. ' ° 1 \J /. rwYlgt lNlrwlrl lnr \rY x 1111 YN. ° t1N 1 Y:1• Iw Y• Y N \ NNM NI•rll Uw^ ... bxlooAp• rl. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9358 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the east side of Turquoise Avenue at Appaloosa Court 48 and Galloway Street OWNER: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc - 1260 West Foothill Boulevard Upland, California 91786 performance Bond (Road) $80,000 0 �r 1: NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improve- ments include curb and gutter, paving, walls and street signs � 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUMMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR Tract 9358 - Release of cash staking deposit of $1,900.00 Location: North of Hillside Road and east of Turquoise Avenue 00 Subdivider: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc 1260 West roothill Boulevard _ Upland, California 91786 NOTE: Certification mouomentsrhave been Wset and Eheihasrbeendpaideint all full 0 q7 rt� l.. C /���� ^I i X358 /N YNWCLRYOR<1Re IISS /lId / /, /u SSRN4 <p /up L/YN1Y ,r MyIUWJ, clv/ nNplNplll. rv�N,{mr. x W' \ Il f < �• • a,t • \•Z� l� ,r p•�p d�`r • ' � , • C • A, is i p y is bwS r / 17 13 r 2' i s 1. `,. '��.« ,., / s S iv I • i; ` c. _ zE t 27ti�1 H , ' ill' - 23 L 22 ��,i)� , :._.. •.�_ •s: .. 2t tA. • i ter. r,.' '..., �'^�+ -•,� ,{ 5 +,o' +. }�a, l'r - WW •rn�, n, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 T0; City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT, CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9381 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue and north of Lemon Avenue S OHNER: Lesny /Hilshire Properties 447 South Fairfax Avenue - Los Angles, California 90036 Performance Bond (Road) $136,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Read Improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improve- ments include curb and gutter, sidewalks, pavirl, walls and street signs r ■ a TRACT 140. 9391 1% 1Nl COONI1 OE IN IEINllOI"O 6EIN: I MIf1S.j, 7 4WIIOS 6 LOIS sl s rS foo"LL FKSRf SS '[7•iS 7 IK Cowls 7 LIN KL=IW IN Slult 6�LL1 Ox IIGL T K" eule � I:}w ilS` t IYIrN'/I.OPMN(YIJa. 1x11, 1 Of • $nil's ""C1a110 INCIMII'$ 0/Iltp• t ...Ow. �•f�J TRACT D` -+✓3� l � S �i..- •y'711 j1 ... •1.`%1 _' :jTMs :. ��.:Ie II•}ps Hiss , - I } 1 S w 1 � =`J I a \�'s� -a 1._ •a, • ea � Y I%ti •'-- s�•....� v,. 1 . •.s a. r.. -....0 •: � i� n =:.i. '�. � to }+.} f s ra � anu.x. xs� •�. '^ �•S.i 1 fir.__ =�r—__ — '..w. va•s.�l••'u � I ll ny t� i� /•F f'� ' :1�F'� � lyl &"M.S N AS IKI 1171Ux a wm • r. w•.r . 411 :1: GAG 1 e.•4 •.. 1;1"..w:; w �«,1. •1. 11.• 1.11..,1. :iw.u'•�n `nl` uom.,u mNUnl. a 1 rx vN u 1 nn 1nl n a..•�nnu•Lxu 1.. u. xiro ro.•. Lnl.v x.ol 1 waru.�ua�wmlLlllrl. • ,. mu;aw yl.l • • .w . 11111 lu..u. •N IMV .•I +U llr�� »' Y E a 1 y I va•s.�l••'u � I ll ny t� i� /•F f'� ' :1�F'� � lyl &"M.S N AS IKI 1171Ux a wm • r. w•.r . 411 :1: GAG 1 e.•4 •.. 1;1"..w:; w �«,1. •1. 11.• 1.11..,1. :iw.u'•�n `nl` uom.,u mNUnl. a 1 rx vN u 1 nn 1nl n a..•�nnu•Lxu 1.. u. xiro ro.•. Lnl.v x.ol 1 waru.�ua�wmlLlllrl. • ,. mu;aw yl.l • • .w . 11111 lu..u. •N IMV .•I +U llr�� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1179 To: City council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSE14T CALENDAR ` TRACT 9397 - Accept roads and release bonds Located on the southwest corner of Hillside I and Amethyst • Street I OWNER: erowell /Leventhal, Inc _ 1260 West Foothill Boulevard Upland, California 91786 Performance Bond (Road) $82,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement plans and it is recotmended that the roads be accepted The improve- ments include curb and gutter, paving, walls and street signs. ■ U 51 •. !14 ' TRACT NO. 9W SHCCII or I SNE[IS IP 1Nl CDUI•II Of SaP Dlftlarr lMC PSSODIAI[0 iHWI[[PS DIY. i P QIS IP a•O II ttCGDlI� 1111 ISO [11-11 „303110” D IP l aril fY OHIPPIO.CPlV011H13 fW )1 I I 1 q � 5 { •^ { � ai �aa I � wr•r PD�O�_ •L J >rrl ruer.> — x ILLp[ r f•v •rJ � + ! . 1 ?vs� i�iw v.i�r' rarer mrn� rrf>. _ •ra r �Ja) /earns urr�i+ w.u+nir� i I I I Y » xi 31 30 so 4 1 w I jl I cvo -II i ..• fa tl I I 1 _I!• ~ I S M YArY Y, Ar t� I f.7\ H .♦N»e _r�I •Irti lrrr'.r. .. rV �{ I. I) I I t 11 �r \' i •, r,ur. tis ws...Ver �l0 sir +ter SyN.r9 S rGiCS xq aa4 .r r -r "•� y' C XZ� II I • 5,2 -< Yh4 Mltlf hJY,,,rY.�iir'�Nrx•.\ii�'!'m .wwlY rxlr� II -'_ i ■, A= TRACT NO. 9397 SNEE,, ,SNEM IN INI [0041) GI 51R OE 01 t q IRO ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS MI,ISIDI O OWCEES I INSOAI R 6 RWUE Wp VS5 IS KCMO 11 )I:US W) ONSARIO.C[EVORMA on S, Pitts 30 "a 31 91 OM O SLY K"MIRO EON11 EtSODRIIt —1' I R ] is•+w�r ems.! /rsa�iT \ 1' a 1 �t iii y.'. .f • v nvu 1' 1[N[f[ pr.n• iii ^"'G - -r>"- - tir,.' -. - -{5 -__ _ •(:.� _ ..w,. • •• RANCHO SiiO T a is ]! 5i D.l ,t 11 Jp FIhJ i [!�7 w •tp hI ITT D A N 11 4 t1 It t3 21 is t tt tl �t iii y.'. .f • v nvu 1' 1[N[f[ pr.n• iii ^"'G - -r>"- - tir,.' -. - -{5 -__ _ •(:.� _ ..w,. • •• RANCHO SiiO T a [!�7 w •tp hI ITT D A N 11 �t iii y.'. .f • v nvu 1' 1[N[f[ w r' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Llcyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9447 - Release of bonds Located on the northwest corner of Church Street and Ramona Avenue OWNER. llalton Construction Corporation 511 Hest Citrus Edge P. 0. Box 775 Glendora, Lalifornia 91740 Labor and Material (Sewer $6,500 Labor and Material (Water $9,500 NOTE: Since there are no liens against this tract filed with the City Clerk as of March 29, 1979, these bonds are subject to release. w � I' %t `Sq S t MAI b ct { i �ntv9iiy • t a i )J il S: l�u `•� �a Q J ♦ i I t •`vv vaii4 jz5 ,r�sra• •�� •S� 1� '1LK JJ.FL 7 � it tt n} Y � -- Zf f 1lff ri= 3yy�nty .v� ti/dY j�.6 TLt�� h � N m '16 1 o , 1 =!i� +i•:I rr�r M1I"'L .1 i 3�h �I 7 .a is iz !1 41 ��+' �; ' +�; fj d� 3 a tvf.•• '1 . �•t • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: City Council FROMt Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9450 - Release of bond Located between Hermosa Avenue and Romona Avenue at La Vine • Street OWNER: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. - 1260 West Foothill Boulevard Upland, California 91786 Performance Bond (landscaping) $5,225 NOTE: The landscaping requiremnts have been met, therefore, it is recommended that this bond be released. r1 u 0 V V S V TRACT NO 9450 to LwINCORPOAAI(O 1(IRIIORY Oi Ih( CpN1I OI lrM O(RNINdMO. CAIHOIM4 "f / JIEGN CPI IO/ /pN N. ZOCV I fN'INbGr IM.ML)O AIIOCIIINH' LM'O! ACCONOINC rO KfI .VCO1Cf0 IM ILtlI C•O/ MI J IICI rf, *rlcm! CV Acc[tw roII.OI /,a,r OI COHMV (NI lOI )lfCfgYJ)! IN1) N J/M ACCONOIMC IO (Y(ICIA( KAI GI SAID LANG .. NNd'LO IY rhC lLMYLIOR C(N(AA{ OAr(O AKYIr Ir, Ilrr M .ZAR. ZN CR /NC CO I ICACC 1•. 40• AVLNJ( qb nq yt ..oC IMrt•:M f L,. NC I /NM(1((MM r IVOCI MAP 1 «Nr • • irslG1.dL •Z.NII �� rOf ii•i r.. u1/ � Tiara amm Nr? faj IM: In nra /r "Ir JIM ua q'IIp' 1/M rqt' rm rr•. rr• nn nrr 1. Tu bulry r Nr11'!fY uun IN W ruNllr N Ner N.•r « N.[t rw NN .re..w N •trN 111. I.W tl. 11 . fl r IYpr. Iw.•1..t W Mtur11N 1 f.M1. .t .M • .M YNf .t Nntry�nt tu. u. iit m�.a1 riilli��i:i .::�tu ..i:n «w�:f.�i+i• tru Ir N.W .N .. uprr ec s. uit n tw r rw• YrrW�gNtl« r UI NM Ut Iluf. wlrN 1. . u^ IrtUU. erNt INtN U WN. 1. • INIt.U. 1• C rrr Mt .r u.Fl t.C.t. I1H. 1 /f• I4/ f1.NW M..r•nt frir.r•"Nr Mur�rr.rrl 1. O IWUw w..0 UN xb a Nw. x n.N.b J u... Itrfas •1 ur1 nu r nlr N W run .I \Y Nrlr INw)Y. t. n IrWnr orn Nu. N• TWIT. � f..fn'X•IWUtn Nt Nlw Nt W. IIN. noNb. rtm Irr r/• u. r «u • • irslG1.dL •Z.NII �� rOf ii•i r.. u1/ � Tiara amm Nr? faj IM: In nra /r "Ir JIM ua q'IIp' 1/M rqt' rm rr•. rr• nn nrr ■i /I JAI, TRACT NO. 9450 N rNINCdMYIRO RNaIIdY d lN[�OIM I COGYSKIAAfAVI<I! /O ASSKtA I.6V uNC aLebwroN d / roFrw/ d LANDS .1 AC[0.OIMG TO ILAT alLOICfO LN /DON 1 O( YAIJ. NG( IL AlCdOS d yMJCII[ RAldSAID L NOAA�.00'!0 iTN(TSL 3. rtC•GlNLAAL, Ditto A1516r�r /"I r0 SCAL( hl0• AOCLSr lerl ANg ONL Glr f N[[AN0 M ` Ord! mOV.YiY 30! I lnrrtr rN.9Nffr S.. SAyr rJ s 1Y W., T TRACT I A'R , 9/07' I I 1 1 Mai rtI[• -s' I r �1 i to 1 n NYNn [ 1 ! I J I ! 0 1 1 I , I _ I /Lr N I rl� rIa p Ir' t I 1 1 1 I..I 1 •In 1 r riN•NJ, rn•A•my nY nu n1}y no m a n }�' Y i� u 77Y �`, -:��.{ a - •: "Yd'N't. CI �fl �' F Jr rN• •, S ' 3� }C y !1 }In �¢• N t nC ao'CV I.} /, .0 �rnt n.m— ti eaMN'[ �7 a • rI, tSi. fl�[[""fitt , :! _ SI II JR i'i al 'II r 1 $ t !• .Il n•t a r.a t ;I' le •AllNnrt Nm rmtl 17 /aunt I9 I q m •I wN m In r'� il1 +NN .o y Q w °° r! o n i w•�..r• n^" ga = I• K � ! II ! �: hI � Y a° io x !e N � Ir �g II s� • � %}- I N•..n: m .m a — _ ' r n r • N Intl rNm i 1 1 i F-1:-- •�I��T/R'F -- CA Y/A7 STREET S ' (/ NM Y'Nm wsr Nm � -�= Q- �_ Q�•�Q�•� -� ."�}� f H' -�• -�' a e . e Y ! e ro j e rr kit rr u x a fiY I g r e I a6 • I .- a- � • • mm � N . mm — 1 N N ur mw m `� 1 .r1 •a•m.«...- mYA•,.[ auaryi O' 9 ' n:«r.Yw nq nrlN. /n,Yr � rm.Ir I� 'III�G' %/ YVI I CY/YL OII.1 I /ECl • N /IV p r1 a Iytl pryN' M J AT JIJY 4 w A n IJ n! IIM• •Yy'm NN• /Il! •IOY /Ynh• NaY /r II � ora' rrnn• !ry G �� J c i I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: City Council FF,OM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9484 - Accept roads and release bond Located between Beryl Street and Hellman Avenue, south of Hillside Road and north of Banyan Street OWNER: David W. Long 12031 Vista Street Etiwanda, California 91739 performance Bond (Road) $42,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improve .nt Mians and it is recommended that the roads t< accepted The improve- ments include curb and gutter, paving, walls and street signs. �9 0 M y Yeyg z sii i Y1Y ;rl 1 t:� a tit ..;r FY , .� 1 aa•.w a. a:.. )n YtnY C x,n lt=x )nx)YY u i )I �• 1 a 3 • i' I j = ti ��'l�� =YL OMIIIY) r I xt'1I till, P to � �� " 1 it °— •I \\ x =I ='= (1A •.r. I , 1 � Vt 444 � ..• e )nx)YY u i )I �• 1 a 3 • i' I j = ti 3 ��'l�� =YL OMIIIY) r I xt'1I till, P to � �� " 1 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4. 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9569 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the east side of Amethyst Street betweer. Nilson Avenue and Hillside Road OWNER: Don 1? �kuCircle, Suite C Irvine, California Performance Bond (Road) $134,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement plans and t is recommended that the roads be mentssinclude curb and gutter, accepted avng, wall rove- s and street signs • - TRAC T NO. 9 56 9 WE „R, n�;,."OS IN IM[Cl tt OF ,IMCN[ LUC IYLM CI THUM MI(C•111 i tt 14/ 1 xUllifim Q I Nola OF M? if NC.• r.v p IT P[ ri ,au 1 v v1•2 Pu I[ PLC= Q M mtt Q SA, t1F41,.1W SIIC7 Q [µ1!10,411 1.O t tLxtIM 7 [LCt1Q.It SECTION It t Ix a 71 f, x NFL” 129 a2: •12 a, •l© ;• p 7 Is © l! I 7 p n Ib a♦ n a ' Ap -71 ' I' 10 I� t I 1 to •0 I A � a e1 LI �1 i I la [M 1• t ^ •I a tiO I Y •fL. r l O 1 I Ivrvrr �® 3 . 21 to i l l 11 E" 24 ROT A 2 PART gas I e.- n.K4J IF NKIGY �.n Iv[xu ` r _� �T•�' n..4` ��� ,. � i. i 0 CITZ OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA MEMORANDUM DATE. April 4, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR Tract 9616 - Release of cash stakin; deposit of $3,050.00 Locatio,,: North of At .,ow Route and wrest of Hellman Avenue Subdivider: M. J. Brorl n Sons. Inc. 6767 Forest -awn Drive - Lc: A ^2e:v_, California 90068 NOTE: Certification from Thomas 0. McCutchan, Engineer, indicates that all final monuments have been set and he has been paid in full. W..J 1 I I I ' 1 Ir 1 I. uri r.m Mimi _ Ml r0 +CKIn IM .Mt CCVYtt 01 Yy Gt,Lllllwl TRACT N0. 9616 Mh6 1 MO..MA V . ICar�pr V s0ef .V' I I ::.Ti rn y1°fR•f.W U .R 1 CKl'rS M Y♦wee t. �• O rlV VMC`O.a[ _✓ 1•° :O V V W. Iy'[ .. I• T4 wee V nt C•,- t• . C: All at Vst. AI} trw[[. frur°w. •fuc+rn.[wrc.um 1• ^ �ii Iw ! [o� ' to Ito it 1 tl [ i v i `• i •� w`— 611t r ,t M t\ i.r a � � i • 1 1 rte_ • 1•• S ii 4 M t1 ✓ 41 ° d 1l' e• i ••`H 1 • 1 .0 Y, / a .n .I 1 ,[u[, -- -- t. i 1 \1 t3 I 1 1 q r 144 I Pact ♦ `I p 4Y•-- n,, 111- w.• q+•Ir'�i� l� �_ ^� • „ 1 — 1,— — e Y 1 as at 1 au4T•d...an= - I 40 xt IL V■ / .. _r -� � ) -�.. mow. d`r 1 i Vogo � s I$ •.. 46 A y '•� /� �� i s I a. I ac ). TRAC Nn 9274 M69a'•s 9Z r - - -• _ w T :DVr'• "'" "AY ft j t; _ TRACT N0. 9616 L tlw . ldwxlo. ✓. ro.rw a lm)a an a...don .: ytrwuw d ld 1 <Y44 a' WtrYp fI.:T .a •d .1 .l t. M Y11M f0 d Yl/a. .14.{ .. M Ix[ dlKt d T.[ CDtM.t 11l[dOf. Y 49 CYl• Yarn a,? twain. wwc.0 a YfOl.aTn, acd)d)Tco Y-4a f•W 1 as at 1 au4T•d...an= - I 40 xt IL V■ / .. _r -� � ) -�.. mow. d`r 1 i Vogo � s I$ •.. 46 A y '•� /� �� i s I a. I ac ). TRAC Nn 9274 M69a'•s 9Z r - - -• _ R. J. SIEBER & CO. fnauroneeAQjuarerr w cue •ouv ewn � eoNw�ewrwawena, xwoes•ew March 29, 1979 Rancho Cucamonga City 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Attn: City Clerks office Gentlemen: RECEIVED CITY OF RAHC1;0 CUCA510IIGA AOMINISTRATION MAR 29 1971_ AM vv MT.* 7 191101111i1111`l.13141616 Claim: 307 18 20 Assured: Edgar Blevins, Jr. Accident: 1 -14 -78 Claimant: Lydia Hosqueda Our File: 5742 ES lie represent International Services Insurance Company on behalf of Edgar Blevins, Jr. in regards to the above captioned accident which occured within the confines of your City. This accident occured an January 14, 1978 at approximately 3:00 P.H. at the intersection of Hillside and Haven, in Rancho Cucamonga. This was a 2 vehicle auto�wbile accident involving the 1970 Mercury license 034 IICY driven by our insured, fir. Blevins, and a second vehicle, a 1975 Lincoln Continental, California license 447 UBX driver, by a Hr. Arthur Mosqueda. Mr. Blevins resides at 1417 West Fawn Street, Ontarl•, California, Mr, Mosqueda resides at 1171 vine Street, San Bernardino, California. The accident occured as Mr. Blevins was eastbound on Hillside, approaching Haven. Itr. 1osqueda was southbound on Haven. As Mr. Blevins approached Haven, looking for a stop sign to ascertain if he had reached Haven, where he desired to make a right turn, southbound, he was unable to observe a stop sign, there was no stop sign and he continued on across Haven, believinq he had not yet reached it, and was struck by Hr. Mosqueda. A police report of this accident is on file with the Ranchu Cucamonga office of the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, their OR 1962- 925 -11. This report essentially confirms the above. Our investigation has disclosed that there was no stop sign for eastbound Hillside, at Haven at the tine of this accident, a stop sign was placed at Haven, for eastbound Hillside traffic within the week followinq the accident. Our investigation is further disclosed that lack of this stop sign was the primary cause of this accident for which our principal, International Services Insurance Company has paid, and will pay claims totatina an unknown amount at this time. Qicy de amto muncoulp _y March 29. 1979 mur IATAwltteD MIM ft `.mttk** ttovard tale city of Rancho r=w mnga for retnburseaent afi the =WCS pH mrrcll-- t Wr OW150 mf 'Imumme vith Mr. S'evins. nam ftme ffin tom¢ for the ?SYy contact us so that we may &SsnLms t +JS matter *dth 006 1AWA ymu for 2w e mauttesy. very truly yours. ssmfl7,,-.e"AIIY 67 0 ID ORDINANCE N0. 65 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN ORDINANCE MU REPEALING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE PERTAINING TO SIGN REGULATIONS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: ARTICLE I SECTION 1.0 The City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes the need for signs as a means to Identify businesses within the community. However, the City also recognizes that signing becomes an important design element of the • physical environment. Provisions consistent with the goals and objec- tives of the community, are necessary to insure that the special charac- ter and Image, the comzuhity Is striving for, can be attained. The*City of Rancho Cucamonga is striving to provide an economically stable and visually attractive community through high quality site planning, build- ing design, landscaping and signing. As a planned architectural feature, a sign can be pleasing and can harmonize with the physical character of Its environment. Proper controls can achieve this goal and will make the City of Rancho Cucamonga a more attractive place to live, work and shop. It is the purpose of this Ordinance to make our city attractive to resi- dents, visitors and commerclal, Industrial and professional businesses while maintaining economic stability through an attractive signing program. SECTION 1.1 Oblectives and Basi e. The objectives and basis for the various sign regu- • lotions contained in this Ordinance are: (1) to direct persons to various activities and enterprises, in order to provide for the maxlmum public convenience; (2) to provide a reasonable system of controls for signs, to insure the development of a high quality visual environment; (3) to encourage signs which are well designed and pleasing In appearance and to provide incenri-c and latitude for variety, good design relationship, and spacing; (4) to encourage a desirable urban character which has a minimum of overhead clutter; (5) to enhance the economic value of the community and each area thereof through the regulation of such things ns size, number, location, design and tllnminntion of signs; (6) to encourage signs which are compatible with adjacent land uses; (7) to reduce possible traffic and safety hazards through good signing; and (8) to protect the general public health, safety and welfare of the community. SECTION 1.2 Definition@: The following are definitions of terws contained in this Ordinance. 1. Advertla In Structure: An on or off site structure of any kind or eharac[er other than the main business Identification signs, erected or maintataed for outdoor advertising purposes, upon which any poster, bill, printing, painting, or other advertibement of any kind whatso- cvec may be placed, Including statuary for advertising purposes. �b Area of Signs: The area of a sign shall include the entire area within any type of perimeter or border which may enclose the outer limits of any writing, representation, emblem, figure or character, together with any other material or color forming an integral part of the display or used to dlffertntiate ac-.h eign from the background which it is placed The area c,f a sign having ro such peri- meter shall be computed by enclosing the entire area within parall•elagrams, triangles or circles in a size sufficient to cover the entire area and computing the size of such arch In the case of a two sided sigr., the area shall be computed as including only the maximum single display surface which is visible from any ground position at one (1) time. The supports or uprights an which any sign is supported should out be I.., luded in determining the sign ores unless such supports or uprights are designed in such a manner as to form an integral background of the eign. In the ease of , any cylindrical sign the total area shall be computed on the total area of the surface of the sign. 7. Banner, Flag, Pennant or Balloon: Any cloth, bunting, plastic, • paper or similar material used for advertising purposes attached to or pinned on or from any structure, staff, pole, line, framing, or vehicle 4, Building Face: The area of the front building elevation in vlilch the business in located. If more than one business is located in a single building, than such arw shall be limited to that ports m which is occupied by each individual business. 5 Business Directory Sign: A sign located in a multi -tenant complex which lists each business and address located therein. 6 Business Identification: An on -site sign which identifies the business located thereon. 7 Construction or Contractor Sign: A temporary sign which elates the names of the individuals and /or firm connected with the construction of a project Such sign my include the name of the project, the address of the business, and the emergency telephone comber S. Ceavenience Sim: A sign not larger than two (2) square feet which conveys information Such as "restrooms", "no parking ", "entrance", and the like but does not contain land, trade, advertising or business identification and is designed to be viewed on site by pedestrians and /or motorists 9. CODs: Any words, letters, numbers, figures, designs or other symbolic representations Incorporated into a sign. 10. Directional Stgna. A sign which contains words such as "untrance ", "enter", exl, "in ", "out" or other similar cords or a sign containing arrows or characters indicating traffic directions and used either in conjunction with such wrds or separately. Ho directional sign shill contain any advertising or trade name information A subdivision directional sign shall not be in- cluded in this category. 67 11 Director of Community Development: Shall mean the Director of the Community Development of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 12 Director Review: A method of review by the DSrectur of Community Development as stipulated in Ordinance y No. 19 to determine conformance with applicable ordinances. 13 Flashtng Sign: Any sign which contains o. is illuminated by lights which are intermittently on and off, which change intensity, or which create the illusion of motion in any manner. 14. Freestanding Sign: A sign which is permanently supported by one (1) or more uprights, braces, poles, or other similar structural components when utilizing earth, rock, the ground or any foundation set in the ground as a primary supportive base, which does not exceed 20 feet in height. 15. Future T. +nt Identification Sign: A temporary sign which identifi a future use of a situ or building. - 16. Crand Opening: That promotional activity used by newly eatnblished businesses, within thirty (30) days after occupancy, to inform the public of their location and contribution to the community Grand opening does not mean an annual or occasional promotion of retail sales by a business. 17. Height of a Sign: The greatest vertical distance measured from the grade at the point the sign supports intersect the ground and any accompanying architectural features of the sign. However, if the sign Is constructed upon an artificial barn, the height of the sign, as measured from the toe of elope or berm, shall not exceed 150 per cent of the maximum height allowed by this ordinance 18. Inoperative Activity: A business or activity thut has ceased operation at any given location for a period of at least 30 days 19 Interior Sign: A sign inside of any business that can not be seen fron outside the building in which the business is located. 20 Monument Sign: A low profile lees thnn 8 ft. In h.:ight, free- standing sign incorporating the design nod building materials accenting the architectural theme of the buildings on the some property. 21. Nonconforming Sic n: A sign that does not comply with the provisions of this ordinance 22. Off -site Stgn: A sign which advertises or directs attention to products or activities that are not provided on the site upon which the sign is located. 23. Off -site Subdivision Sign: A sign in accordance with this ordinance, which directs traffic to a subdivision within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 76 24. On -site Subdivision Sinn: A sign which identifies the sub- division upon which the sign is located. 25. Pedestrian Traffic Sian: A sign subject co the size limitations listed in this ordinance which Is other than the main business identification sign and which is oriented to pedestrian traffic. Such sign shall not include any advertising Information. 26. Political Sinn: A sign erected prior to an election to advertise or identify a candidate, campaign issue, election proposition, or other related matters. 27. Portable Sign: A sign not designed to be permanently attached to a structure or to the ground. 28. Rerl Estate Steel A temporary sign advertising the sale or lt_.e of the property upon which it is located, and the identification of the firm handling such sale, lease, or rent. 29. Revciving Sinn: A sign, .idch all or a portion of, may rotate either on an intermittent or constant basis. - 30. Roof Sign: A sign erected, constructed, or placed upon or over a roof or parapet wall of a building and which is wholly or partly supported by such buildings. 31. Roof: The external upper covering of a building or structure. 32 Sign: Any card, cloth, paper, metal, or painted character visible from outside of a structure for advertising purposes, mounted to the ground or any tree, wall, bush, rock, fence, or structure, either privately or publicly owned. Sign shall mean any graphic announcement, declaration, demonstration, display, illustration, or insignia, used to advertise or promote the interest of any person when the same is placed out of doors in • view of the general public. This definition shall not include the display of the American flag or the flog of the State of California. 33. _Special Event Signs: A temporary sign which advertises special events and activities such as grand openings, charitable events, Christmas trees, and fireworks. Such signs are limited to the provisions listed in this ordinance. 34. Temporary Signs: A sign erected for a temporary purpose at- ractins attention to an activity as provided for within this ordinance. 35. Wall Sign: A sign attached to or erected against the wall of a building or structure with the exposed face of the sign parallel to the plane of said wall. 36. Window Sign: A off +ainted. attached, glued, or otherwise affixed to a window, or otherwise snuffy visible from the exterior of the building. 2l 37. Vehicle Sian: A siMn •d,ich is attached to a vehicle and placed on any property so as to attract attention to a product, activity, or business which is in addition to the main business Identifi- cation sign. ARTICLE II PERMIT REOUIREHENTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES SECTION 2.0 Director Review Required: Director review shall be required prior , to the placing, erecting, moving, or reconstructing of any sign in the City, unless expressly exempted by this Ordinance. Signs requir- ing Director Review shall comply with the provisions of this Ordinance and all other applicable lave and ordinances. SECTION 2 1 Ne the of Application: An application for Director Reviev.shall be 'do an forme as prescribed by the Director of Cominity Development. Such an application shall be filed with the Planning Division with applicable plans set forth by the Planning Division Said application shall be accompanied by any fees or bonds as specified by City Council Resolution. *,SECTION 2.2 Method of Review: The purpose of Director Rcvicw is to help insult compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance. After receipt of a sign application, the Director of Community Development or a designated representative shall render a decicion to ipprove, approve with modification, or deny such eipn request within 15 working days Such s review shall insure that any sign proposal is in conformance with thin Ordinance and is consistent with -s intznt and purpose. ARTICLE. III ADMINISTRATION SECTION 3.0 Director of Community Development: It shall be the duty of the ® Director of Community Development to enforce all provisions of this Ordinance. ThL Director of Community Development has the authority under this Ordinance to designate a representative of the Department to implement the provisions of this Sign Ordinance. further, the Director of Community Development has the option of referring any sign request to the Planning Commission for their review and approval. SECTION 3 1 Interpretation: The pro- isions of this Ordinance are not intended to abrogate any easements, covenants, or other existing Agreements which are more restrictive than the provisions of this Ordinance. Whenever the application of this Ordinance is uncertain due to ambiguity of its provisions, tl:e question shall be referred to the Planning Commission for determination. The Planning Commission shall then authorize signing which beat fulfills the intent of this Ordinance. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phiose, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held Invalid or unconstitutional by any court of proper Jurisdiction, ouch portion shall be deemed, a separate, distinct and Independent provision and such holdings shall not affu-t the validity of the remaining portions hereof. - - SECTION 3.2 Variunces: Applications for a variance from the terms of this Ordinance shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission according to the variance procedures ae set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 3.3 Appeal: A decision of the D'.rector of Coamunity Development my be appealed within ten (10) days: of such decision to the Planning Comission. Such appeal sha Ll be made on the forms prescribed by the Division of Community Development and fees paid in accordance with the fee resolution. Tsui submission of the application and fees shall constitute the fling of the appeal. The Planning Commission shall review sud, appeal at a reaulatly scheduled meeting according to the schedule of meetings and deadlines for submission Of applications. The CamimSsslon shall either uphold, reverse, or modify the Director's decision. If anyone is aggrieved or affected by the decision of the Planning Comission, then they my appeal Both decision to the City Council within ten (10) days frro the decision of the Planning Coeaission.1he appeal shall be submitted in accordance with the above appeal provisions. The City Council shall review such appeal and either uphold, reverse, or modify the Commission decialon ARTICLE IV GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 4 0 Exempt Signs: The following signs shall be exempt from tla application, permit, and fee requirements of this Ordinance. An electrical or building permit my, however, be required: 1 Permanent window signs not exceeding three (3)square feet and limited to business Identification, hours of operation, address and emergency information only. 2 Re]I estate signs for residential Bales not exceeding four (4) square feet in area or five (5) feet in height, pro- vided it is unlit and Is removed within fifteen (15) days after the close of escrow or the rental or lease has been •• ac:omplished. 3. Contractor of Construction Signs: One (1) directory sign shall be permitted on the construction site for all conntractors (my include bank, realtora, subcontractors, etc.) not exceeding thirty-two (32) square feet unless legally required by government contracts to be large[. No sign shall exceed 8 feet in overall height and shall be located no leas than tell (10) feet from any property lino Such sign shall be removed upon the coaplation of the project 4. Future Tenant Identification Sign: Future tenant idonti- ficatlon signs may be placed on vacant or developing property to advertise the future use of the property and where this information my be obtained. Such sign shall be limited to one (1) per parcel and to a maximum of thirty -two (32) square feet In area and eight (8)fcet In overall height. Further, such signs shall be placed no less than ten (10) feet from any property, line. Any such sign shall be removed upon c- opletion of such project. 23 5. Real Estate Signs for Sale of Industrial or Cocaercial ' Property : One (1) sign per street frontage not to exceed thirty -two (32) square feet in area to advertise the sale. lease, or rent of such property. No such sign shall exceed eight (8) feet in overall height and shall not hu located closer than ten (10) feet from any property line. Where a property has in excess of 600 lineal feet of frontage, an additional sign for every 600 lineal feet is allowed. 6. Interinr signs within a structure not visible from off- site or from outside of building. 7. Memorial tablets, plaques, or directional signs !or community historical resources, Installed by a recognized Historical Society or civic organization. 8. Convenience signs not exceeding three (3) square feet in iota. 9. Residential building identification signs used to identify Individual residences and not exceeding two (2) square fer.. 10 Official and legal notices Issued by the court, public bo.ly, person or officer in performance of his public duty or in giving any legal notice. 11 Directional, warning, or informational signs or etr,cturtn required or authorized by law or by Federal, State, Count-1, or City authority 12. Official flags of the United States of America, the State of California, and othut states of the United 'totes. Counties, Ilunlc1pa11ties and official flags for nations, and flags of internationally, and nationally recognized organizations. • 13. Signs of public uti. ty companies, Indicating danger or which serve as an aid to public safety or which show locations of underground facilities or public telephones. 14. Safety signs on construction sites. 15. Time and Temperature signs that convey time and temperature only anJ not exceeding 12 square feet nor 8 feet in height. SECTION 4 1 Prohibited Signs: All signs not expressly permitted are prohibited In all zonoa. Including but not limited to the following: 1. Roof Glens. 2. Flashing signs (except in time and temperature signs) 3. Animated signs. 4 Revolving signs 5. V.hiclo signs (when used on property to identify a business). 6. Portable signs (except where permitted in this ordinance). SECTION 4.2 SECTION 4.7 SECTION 4.4 7. Off -site signs (excet.t temporary subdivision directional signs as provided for in this ordinanco). 8. Signs on the public right -of -way (except where required by a gave tram ental agency). 9. Signs blocking doors or fire escapes. 10. Light bulb strings and exposed tubing (except for temporary uses such as Christmass tree lots). 11. Banners, flags, pennants and balloons (exctnt for special events as provided for in this Ordinance). 12. Advertising structures (except as othOm"' permitted in this Ordinanceh. Signs Relating to Inoperptive Ar ivities: Signs pertaining to activities or business which are no longer in operation, shall ha removed from the thin sixty Premises or the sign cope shall be removed or obliterated vi (60) days after he premises has beca vacated Any such sign not removed be subjecttto specified time 511311 constitute and shall this Ordinance, Enforcement legal Procedures and Penalties: Enforcement, legal procedures and penal[ ies shall be in accordance the zoung with the enforcement Additionally, illegaip signs u established the public right-OfiwayOrmaynbeca. summarily abated by the City and held, pending notification of the paymentytoh the City ofe storage orage obtain said sign from char8e thatomayt on owner may have been incurred by the City Construction and Maintenance: 1. Construction: Every sign and all parts, portions, and material. shall be manufactured, assembled, and erected in compliance with all applicable Store, Federal and City regulations and the Unifom Building Code. 2. Naintenance: Every Sign and all parts, portions, and materials shall be maintalhed and kept in proper repair. The display Surface of all signs shall be kept clean, neatly painted and free from rust and corrosion. Any cracked, broken surface., malfunctioning lights, missing sign copy or other unmafntatned or damaged portion of a sign will be repaired or replaced within thirty (10) following days with such a request fwill iconstitute eat zoning violation and will be enforced as such. 7S 7 is ARTICLE V SIGN REGULATIONS Sign permits may be issued for signs included under this section provided the eigns are in compliance to all other applicable laws uad ordinances. SECTION 5.0 Signs Permitted in all Zoning Districts: The following signs may be permitted in any Coning district subject to the provisions listed: 1. Convenience Signs: On -site signs which are necessary for public convenience or safety but which are not exempt, may be approved by the Director of Community Development or his designee. Signs containing information ouch as 'entrance ", "exit ", or directional arrows shall be designed to be viewed from on -site or from an area adjacent to the site by pedes- trians or motorists while parking their automobile. Signs that convey advertising, products, or business identification shall not be considered a convenience sign. • 2. Political Signs: Political signs having to do with any issue, ballot measure, or candidate in any municipal, state or federal election or political statements and expressions shall he permitted subject to the following provisions and any other applicable provisions within this Ordinance. a. Any person, party or group prating political signs In the City shall abide by the provisions herein setforth, b All political signs shall be placed no earlier titan 70 days prior to the election and shall be removed not later than 10 days following the date of the election c. A political sign shall not exceed 32 square feut in total area for one side. No signs shall be placed in • a manner that would obstruct visability of pedestrian or vehicle traffic. d. All pclitical signs shall not exceed an overall height of 6 feet from the finished grade. Signs used for identi- fication of political headquarters shall comply with the provisions of Section V -E of this Ordinance. o. No political signs shall be lighted either directly or Indirectly. f. No political sign shall be placed or fixed to a tree, fence, or utility pole, and shall not he posted on any public property or in the public right -of -way. g No political sign shall be posted in violation of any provisions of this ordinance. Further, the Director of Co munity Development or his designee F ill have the right to remove all signs placed contrary to the provisions of this section.. 76 r Saecaal Event Signs: Special event signs may be approved , for a limited period of time as a means of publicizing special events such as grand opening, nremanagment. Inventory sales for public or charitable events, Christmas tree lots, and fireworks stands To apply for approval of special event signs, the applicant shall submit a letter to the Director of Community Development which describes the , proposed sign by means of a sketch 6 the display dates The Director of Community Development shall review thr request within 15 working days after receipt and shall make a deter- mination to approve, approve t4th modification or deny the request Such special event signs shall be limited to the following provisions: a No more than one special event sign shall be permitted per activity and shall be either a wall, window or ground sign, and use of flags, banners and pennants. t. All special event signs shall be a maximum of 32 square feet and shall be posted below the roof or shell be no higher thin 8 feet in the case of a ground sign. _ C. Special event signs shall be limited to 45 days per calendar year. ' 4. On -site Subdivision Signs: a One (1) terporary on -s:it subdivision sign not to exceed 64 square feet total for cvo (2) sides or 72 square feet for one (1) side and a total overall height of fifteen (15) feet may be permitted on each main street frontage of the property being subdivided not to exceed two (2) such signs for all phones of any subdivision (interior streets of the subdivision are not recognized as main street frontage). b. Such sign shall be fox the identification of a subdivision, �. pricy information and the developers name, address, and telephone number. c. Such signs Shall be removed within ten (10) days from the date of the final sale of the land and /or residences or within twelve (12) months, whichever comes first. Extensions of the twelve (12) months time limit can bt approved by the Director of Community Development in cases of hardship. d. Signs shall be maintained in good repair at all times e. A cash deposit of $500 per sign shall be deposited with the sign application to ensure compliance with the Ordinance and removal of such sign. Said deposit shall be refunded to the applicant upon sign removal by the applicant If the City 1s forcrd to remove any signs. then the cost of removal shall be deducted from deposit. 10 77 a 5. Off -Sit, Subd•.vialon Dirac tlonal Slgnr a. A maximum of six (6) signs may be used to lead customers to the site. b. Signs shall be no larger than 60" x 9" and shall be grouped on a four sided sign structure as shown In Exhibit "A ". Such structure shall contain no more than seven (1) tract Sdectiflcatiore. 0 EXHIBIT "A" R % sign stvcturo stall be located not less than 600' from an existing or previously approved sign site. Further, each sign nay only contain the name of the .ub- division, and a directional arrov as shown on Exhibit "B ". d. The placement of each sign structure shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. v 7� 1 I SHADOW RUN EXHIBIT "B" a. All signs are to be placed an private property with written consent of the property owner obtained and filed with the Department of Community Development prior to issuance of permit. f. A slur lecitiun plan shall be prepared showing the site of each directional sign and shall be submitted to the Depat tmant of Cormunity Development prior to the issuance of a sign permit. g. My ouch sigi approved for a particular subdivision wcthin the Ciy shall not be changed to advertiao another subdiva:tr a without prior approval of the Director of Community Development. h. Tf re shall be no addition*, tag signs, streamers, deuces, display boards or appurtenances added to the , sign as originally approved. Further, no other direc- tional signing my be used such as posters, or trailer signs. i All non - conforming subdivision directional signs associated with the subdivision in question must be removed priov to the issuance of a new sign permit. J. A $500 cash deposit shall be placed with the City to ensure compliance with this ordinance. Any sign placed contrary to the provisiins of this ordinanca may be re- moved by the City and the cost of removal shall be deducted from said deposit. Additional costs incurred by the City resulting from the removal of Illegal signs shall be charged to the developer. k. Said etgn shall be allowed until subdivision is sold out, or for a period of twelve (12) months whichever comes first. Extensions of this twelve (12) month time limit can be approved by the Director of Community Development In rases of hardships. C- G §� g ;E: ' § �; ;| § § §§\ - � . _ 1` ; ! ! :� ::! : | :. l;= ;.,!- | � "! ; ;| • ..1. 1; \ � 0 0 | § � � ! ! m RV ., _: ' !�!!� |!! § ! )\ \\ Tu m | , � ! � � _ §§ % G§ E! @!: g 1.y. ;e A-M �� 0 • 5 4 4. \\� P \a |/ : Pill §§ ! ! § §§ _ w _! w 2 , , { � § . . � �� 0 • } / } \ }!§ : ! � ! � !• }�` � |� f' � � ! � } \j ) } ! • � a } / } \ § , | | § | § k § . lit ZZ \j { \\ \ 135 ! 0 � Kam\ ARTICLE VI DESIGN STANDARDS The following Design Standards shall be adhered to for all signing: SECTION 6.0 Architectural style: That each sign is designed with the intent and purpose to relate to the architectural style of the main building or buildings upon the site, and to the extent not in- consistent with such style, that the sign will be compatible with the style or character of existing improvements uron lots adjacent to the site Signs located on commercial sites but in a predominantly residential area, shall consider compatibility with such residential area. SECTION 6.1 Relationship to bulldinRS: Signs located upon a lot with only one pain building housing the enterprise which the sign ider- tifies, shall be designed to incorporate at least One of the predominantly visual elements of such building, such as type of cow.rructlon materials, color, or other design detail. Each sign lr J upon a lot with more than one main building, such as a ah ig center or other commercizl or industrial area developed In . -crdanta with o cocaon development plan, shall be designed to incorporate ct least one of such predominantly visual design elements common or similar to all such buildings or the buildings occupied by the 'main tenants' or principal enterprises. Tl:e Community Development Directsr may condition its approval of a sign to require more than one such visual .'ements to be in- corporated Into the design of the slgn where such element or elements Is necessary to achieve a significant visual relation- ship between the sign and building or buildings SECTION 6.2 Relationahin to other signs: Where there to more than one monument sign located upon a lot, all such signs shall have designs which are well related to each other by the similar treatment or incorporation of not less than fair of the following six design elements: (1) type of construction materialn as used in the several sign components (such as cabinet, sign copy, supports); (2) letter style of sign copy; (3) illumination; (4) type or method used for supports, uprights or structure on which sign is supported; (S) sign cabinet or other configuration of sign area; (6) shape of entire sign and its several components. SECTION 6.3 Sign dimensions: Tile dimensions of the sign cabinet, if any, or other configuration of the dimensions of the sign area of each sign shall be proportional to and visually balanced with the size of the building. SECTION 6.4 Landscaping: Each monument sign shall be located in a planted landscaped area which is of a shape, design and size (equal to at least the sign area) that will provide a compatible setting slid ground definition to the sign Tl:e planted landscaped area shall be maintained on a rcisonable and regular basis. rn �4 SXTION 6.5 llluminatlon and motion: Monument signs shall be no moving s[atiomty structures (in all components) and illumination, '.f any, shall be maintained by artificial light which is rtationar/ and constant in intensity and color at all times (.on- flashing). SECTION 6. Sirn copy: Sign copy rhall include minimal information only. , The use of subordinate information such as telephone numbers, lists of products, pictures of products, etc, are discouraged. " he name of the use or business shall be the dominant message on the sign. ARTICLE VII NOI;CONFORIIINC SIGNS SECTION 7 0 Intent: It is the intent of this section to recognize that the eventual elimination of oxlsting signs that are not in conformity with the provisions of this Ordinance, is as important as is the prohibition of new signs that would violate these regulations. SECTION 7.1 General Requirements: 1. A nonconforming sign may not bet a. Changed to another nonconforming sign nor have its copy changed or altered. (except billboards) b Structurally altered to extend its useful life. c Expanded. d Reestablished after a business discontinued for 60 days. a. Reestablished after damage or destruction of more than 502 of its value, as determined by the Building Official. 2 No new sign shall be approved for a site, structure, building or use that contains nonconforming signs unless said non - confdrmIng signs are removed or modified to conform with the provisions of thir Ordinance. SECTION 7 2 Anortizatlon Requirements: Every sign or advertising structure which does not comply with the provisions of this Ordinance, shall be amortized in accordance with the following schedule: value Time Period t Signs under $250 180 Days $250 - $500 111 year $500 - $1,000 2 ;ears Over $1,000 G\ 7 5 years _ V The value of a nonconforming sign shall be determined by the Building Official in accurdance with the latest material valuation schedules. Time periods for amortization of nonconformin5 signs shall begin from the effective date of the Ordinance. Any sign which becomes nonconforming either by reason of amendment to this Ordinance or ' by annexation to the City, shall also be subject to the provisions of this Ordinance The period of tlmo within such sign must be abated shall cummence upon the effectiva date of such amendment or annexation. SECTION 7.3 Historical Signs: Signs whirn have historical significance to the co® nit, but do not conform to the provisions of this Ordinance may be allowed to remain provided that the Planning Cotraission makes the following flydinge: 1 The sign has historical significance for the community. • 2 The sign dres not create nor cause a traffic hazard 3. The si,n does not create a visual nuisance to the character of the coaunity. 4. The sign is properly maintained and structurally sound. 5. The sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties. ARTICLE VIII SECTION d 0 The following sections of the San Bernardino County Code dealing specifically with sign regulations and which were adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California by m' rence under Ordinance No. 17, are hereby repealed: • 61.022,�61.024A(a)(5)(L), 61 024A(b)(7), 61.024D(a)(3)(B), 61.024E(a)(4)(N), 61 024E(d), 61.024r(d), 61.025A(b)(17), 61 025B(b)(11), 61.026(f), 61.026A(c)(3), 61.027A(1)(1)(E), 61 027B(b)(2)(I), 61 027C(b)(2)(A,K), 61 027C(1), 61.028(b)(3), 61.029B(c)(5), 61.029C(1), 61.0214A(d) and 61.0219(j) ARTICLE IX SECTION 9 0 Publication: The Mayor shall sign this ordinance end the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause tat same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Dailv Report, a newspeper of general circulation, pub- ' lashed in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California i ARTICLE X SECTIOY 10.0 Effective Date: This ordinance shall ba in force and effect on and after the 71st day following the final passage. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of • Mayor Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: City Clerk O y!�y� ■ ORDINANCE No. 70 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO ACT IN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO CITY COUNCIL IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS, EVENTS, STRUCTURES AND SITES AND TO IDENTIFY PRRSONS OF HISTORICAL SIC171FICANCE TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC,AMONGA The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Purpose. It is hereby found that the ® protect on, en-ancement, perpetuation and use of structures and sites of historic architectural, and engineering significance, located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, are of cultural and - aesthetic benefit to the community It is further found that the economic, cultural and aesthetic standing of this City will be enhanced by respecting the heritage of the City The purpose of this Ordinance is to: (a) Designatu, preserve, protect, enhance and perpetuate those historic structures and sites which contribute to the cultural and aesthetic benefit of Rancho Cucamonga (b) Foster civic pride in the beauty and accomplishments of the past. (c) Stabilize and improve the economic value of certain historic structures and sites (d) Protect and enhance the City's cultural and aesthetic heritage (a) Promote and encourage continued private ownership and utilization of such buildings, ether structures and sites now so owned and used, to the extent that the objectives listed above can be attained under such policy SECTION 2: Material Change, Defined. A material change is any change in t e exterior appearance of .s structure or feature, through alteration, construction, relocation, grading, .[ demolition or otherwise SECTION 3: Historic Preservation commission. '-here e ere y created �Cte Citf ot Rancho ucamonga storic Preservation Commission, SECTION 4: Membershi The Historic Preservation ve mmresidents of then City of Rancho Cucamonga voting members a and appointed by the City Council, subject to the following conditions: (a) The term of office for each member shall be four (4) years, except that two (2) of the members first appointed shsll be designated to serve for a term of two (2) years, and three (3) a term of four (4) years, so as to provide a contin- uity of membership on the Commission. Thereafter. for all each voting member shall be four (4) years. An appointment each term shall be for tv.s remainder of such unexpired term. (b) A Commission member may be removed • upon the majority vote of the entire City Council. SECTION 5: Term. The Mayor, with the approval of the City Dune 1, shall a point the first Chairperson from among the members, subject to the following conditions: The term of office of the Chairperson shall be for the calendar year, or that portion remaining after said Chairperson is appointed or elected, Theeafter, wn thee is thercommission shallrelectaavChnirpersonh from fiamengf Chairperson, SECTION 6: Administration The Community Services Director aliact as Secretary Co tW0 Historic Preservation Commission and shall be the custodian of its records, conduct official correspondence, and generally coordinate the clerical and technical work of the Historic Preservation Commission in administering this Ordinance The Community Services Director may designate an alternate to serve as Secretary during the absence of the Director. SECTION 7: Duties of the Historic Preservation Commies on T e Historic reservar oa omm ee on a s ve the power r anrduty to: (a) Administer the provisions of this Ordinance (b) Pprfom such ether advisory functions as may be delegated fray time to time to the Historic Preservation Commission by the City Council. (c) Cause to be maintained a current r0g13tar of landmark designations for public use and information. -�l E 0 herein, may recoamter "landmark" for an in of structures on a s aesthetic, cultural, value of an historic o the City Council the desi, ideal structure or other fe le lot or site, or a site h chitectural, or engineering nature. The Historic set forth nation of a ture, or gro or (a) Each such designation shall include a description of the characteristics of the landmark which justify N:e designation and consequent benefits to the public which will be derived from its preservation There shall be a description of the particular features that should be preserved, and the legal description of the landmark site. (b) The Historic Preservation Commission may at any time recommend to the City Council the amending or rescinding of a landmark designation pursuant to the same procedures set forth in this ordinance for original designation SECTION 9: Review Criteria. When designating a landmar t e Historic Preservation Lom�ssion and the City Council shall consider the following criteria as a guide in making its determination: (a) Historical and Cultural Significance. (1) The proposed landmark it particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life (2) The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare (3) The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. (4) The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned, important, or a local personality (5) The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. (6) The architect or builder was important (7) The site is the location of ar. important historic event or building 7� (b) Historic Architectural and Engineering Sim= —e• fll The construction materials or engineering ineerig metuniquesedeffectivproposed landmark are unusual or e p (2) The overall effect of the materials are oeautifullandmark is beautiful, or its details and (c) Neighbor find Geogranhic Setting. (1) The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. (2) The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the ne • SECTION 10: Procedure for Designation of a Landmark._ (a) Designation of landmarks may be proposed by the City Council, Historic Preservation Commission, the Secretary or on application ofdasigna Lon�ietrequcstedthorized agents, of the property (b) Any such proposal shall be filed with the community the Se vices data: upon the prescribed form include and (1) Assessor's parcel number and legal description of site (2) Description detailing the • landmarks, special aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or value of an historic nature (3) Sketches, drawings, photographs or other descriptive material (4) Statewxnt of condition of structure (5) Other information requested by Historic Preservation Commission (c) The application shall be referred to the Historic Preservation Commission for review and report to ofethisy0rdinanceas rhecHisto iccPreservationuCo criteria Commission shall hold a public hearing The Historic Preservation Commission shall recommend approval, disapproval, or modification of the designation to the city Council. -49x3 40 • (d) The City Council shall hold a public hearing on any proposed designation no transmitted The City Council may approve, modify and approve, or deny the proposed designation. Approval, or modification and approval, of the designation shall be upon adoption of an Ordinance (e) The property included in any such designation shall be subject to the regulations set forth in this Ordinance and any further controls specified in the designating Ordinance. (f) The Secretary shall cause a copy of the designating Ordinance to be forwarded to any department or agency requesting it or to any individual department or agency to whom the Secretary considers it appropriate to have it sent. (g) A landmark may be identified by an approved City marker SECTION 11: Procedure for Change of Use of a Landmark. (a) Change of use of a structure on a landmark site shall require a special use permit (b) An application for the special use permit shall be filed with the Community Services Department upon the prescribed form and shall contain the following information; (1) A plan showing the relation of the proposed use to surrounding structures. (2) AltErations required for the change of use. (3) Other information deemed necessary by the Historic Preservation Commission (c) After receiving an application for a special use permit, he Community Services Department shall refer it to th• Historic Preservation Commission which shall hold a public hearing. (d) The Historic Preservation Commission may approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the application (e) Prior to approval or modified approval, the Historic Preservation Commission shall find that: (1) The action proposed in consistent with the prupeses of this Ordinance; and, -5qY (2) The use proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural or engineering interest or value of an histroic nature; or, (3) The applicant has demonstrated that denial of the application will result in immediate and substantial hardship. (f) Upon approval of an application, the Historic Preservation Commission shall issue a special use permit, one (1) copy of which will be forwarded to the applicant, one (1) copy of which will be retained in the files of the Community Services Department, and one (1) copy of which shall be forwarded to the Planning Department In addition, a copy shall be forwarded to any other department or agency requesting it gg pp gg property in the City shall)haveythe rightaofdapppeal to thelCity • Council Notice of appeal must be filed with the City Clerk _ within ten (10) days following the action of the Historic Preservation Commission. h) No special use permit shall be issued unless the prnposid use at the subject location is permitted by the Zoning Ordinance SECTION 12: Procedure to Authorize Construction, emo ton a ocat on or Material Change on a uesignate MnQlaerK. (a) Except as otherwise provided in Section 16 of this Ordinance, it shall be unlawful for any person to carry out or cause to be carried out a material change on any designated landmark unless a landmark alteration • permit has first been obtained for such material change (b) Any person desiring to carry out a material change on a designated landmark shall apply for a landmark alteration permit. (c) An application for a landmark alteration permit shall be filed with the Community Services Department upon the prescribed form and shall contain the following data: (1) A statement of the proposed work.; (2) Plans describing the size, height, and appearance of the proposed work; (3) A site plan showing all existing buildings and structures and tha proposed work; _ L L a (4) Where the application is for demolition, the necessity for demolition shall be justified; and, (5) other information deemed necessary by the Historic Preservation Commission. (d) After receiving an application for a landmark alteration permit, the Community Services Department shall refer ia hearing Historic Preservation commission which shall a publi (e) The Historic Preservation Commission in considering the appropriateness of the landmark alteration application shall consider, among other things, purposes of this ordinance and the historic architectural ,alue Commission e and significance of the landmark. Among other shall take into consideration the texture and material of the building or structure in question or its an urtenant fixtures, including signs, fences, parking, (f) The Historic Preservation Commissina may approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the application. (g) Prior to approval or modified approval, the Historic Preservation Commission shall find that; (1) The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of this Ordinance; and, (2) The action proposed will not be detrntal to a culturall, ,,earchitectural,correngineer ngeinterestiorcvalue of an historical nature; or, (3) The action proposed is necessary to correct an unsafe or dangerous condition on too property; or, (4) The applicant has demonstrated the denial of the application will result in immediate or substantial harlship. (h) Upon approval of an application, the Historic Preservation Commission shall issue a landmark alteration permit, one (1) copy of which shall be forwarded to the applicant. one (1) copy of which shall be retained in the fof�.whof tshall be Community Services Department, and one (1) copy shall be forwarded to the Building official In addition, a copy forwarded to any other department or agency-requesting it (i) Any person residing in or owning Councily SHoticeCofyappeal must beefil right a shall have dwith theaCity Clerk ity within ton (10) days following the action of the Historic Preservation Commission. W d (j) No building, grading or demolition permit shall be issued by the City, if the issuance of such permit will allow a material change to be carried out on a designated landmark, unless the applicant for such permit has first obtained a landmark alteration permit SECTION 13: Advice and Guidance to Pro ert Owners. The Histor c reservation Coma ss on may, upon request o t e property owner, render non - technical advice on proposed work on a dLSi nated landmark alteration permit. In rendering such advice and pgpuidance, the Historic Preservation Commission hall Section the criteria or controls upon any property. SECTIO14 14: Conformance Requirement. Issuance of permit n con ormance w ±t c e r Dance :hall not alter ofnformance requirements with other of requirements . ndards SECTION 15: Unsafe or Dan erous Condition. prevent of the prows one of this Or Dance a a ° removal, demolition or any measures of construction, alteration, , relocation necessary to correct the unsafe or dangerous conditions of any structure, other feature, or part thereof, which such condition has been declared unsafe or dangeroua by the Building Official, after informing the Historic Preservation Commission when the structure is a landmark, and where the proposed measures declared have been condition, provided nhowever, that atonlyfsucha work as is correct necessaryd to correct the unsafe or dangerous condition may be performed pursuant to this Section. In the event any structure or other feture ora Building lofficial amay authorizer prior tol the tco issionrstary review, that amount of repair or demolition necessary to correct is an unsafe condition. SECTION 16: Pro ert� Owned by Pub_l is A_ ems• The Secretaryary shalitake oppropr ate steps to nority —all public agencies which own or may acquire property in the City, of the responsibilities involved in the hiowneddlandmark. the d agency properties In the case of any publicly owning °aid property shall obtain the approval of the Historic Preservation Commission prior to construction, alteration or demolition thereon; and the historic Preservation commission based all render a report to the owner as expeditiously as possible, on the purposes and standards of this Ordinance If Historic Preservation commission review of a public project involving construction, alteration, demolition or removal on a landmark structure site is required under any other law, the Historic Preservation Commission shall render the report referred to in this Section to ouch public agency without specific request therefor. All officers, boards, commissions and departments of the City shall cooperate in carrying out the spirit and intent of this Ordinance. -8- q7 i SEVION 17: Filing F, +.es. Before accepting for filing any application deacr a '� this Ordinance, the Secretary shall charge and collect such administrative fee as may be set by resolution of the City Council. SECTION 18: Public Hearings, Notice and Conduct (a) Whenever a public hearing is required by the provisions of this Ordinance, it shall be held in accordance with the provisions of this Section. (b) A public hearing before the Historic Preservation Commission shall be at a time and place u5 fixed by the Secretary but not more than sixty ((�6�ij��days after the submission of an application or a proposal f r which the public hearing is required. • (c) A public hearing before the City Council shall be during K regular meeting of the City Council. The City Clerk shall fix the date for the hearing which shall not be later than thirty (30) days after the matter to be considered is referred to the City Council (d) A public hearing may be continued by the body holding the adore for a period not in excess of sixty (60) days (e) Notice of the time, place and purpose of a public hearing shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City not less that ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. SECTION 19: Appeals. The City Council shall hold • a publ a ear ng to cone er an appeal from a decision of the Historic Preservation Commission The City Council may affirm. reverse or modify the action of the Historic Preservation Commission. SECTION 20: Enforcement. (a) Dut• to Administer and Enforce. it shall be the duty of the Community Services Department, an the Building Official to administer and enforce the provisions of this Ordinance with the assistance of other City Departments when deemed necessary (b) Penalties. Any person, corporation or other entity violating any—OF-MY—Provisions of this Ordinance shall be subjeet to fine of not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500 00) or imprisonment of not more than six (6) months, or both such fine and imprisonment. SECTION 21: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the tC y=erk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Dailv Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation, publish�in [� MY —0f Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1979 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: a City Clark -10- Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga • C C ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA ESTABLISHING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE ON NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: There is hereby imposed by this ordinance a fee to provide a predictable and equitable funding source for capital improvements by requiring those developing property to "buy into" the pre - existing City infrastructure so that the impact of new growth on existing improvements will be borne equitably by new development. SECTION 2: Fee Schedule. The Systems Development Fee schedule and corresponding nethod of fee payment shall be in conformance with and equal to an amount as set by Resolution by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • SECTION l: Payment of Fee. Any applicant for building permit for a new development shall pay the Syatema Development Fee in conjunction with payment of the building permit fee. SECTION 4: Exemptions. Any parcel of land which, on the date of applies ion for a building permit, meets the following criteria shall be exempt from paying a Systems Development Fee: a. Alterations which do not increase the floor area of a structure; b Additions to single fmily residential dwellings which do not constitute the addition of a living unit as defined by the building code; SECTION 5: Segregation and Use of Revenues. All funds derived from the Systems Development Fee are to be segregated by accounting practices f •om • all other funds of the City and shall be used for no other purposes than the con.itruction and expansion of City $treats and highwel capital improvements to Provide additional capacity and /or safety capabilities required because of ntv davelopment. Up to twenty -five (25X) of these funds may be expended for the purposed of planning and engineering design and administrative services of such capital improvements. Initial funds collected under this Ordinance may L ..Lilized to conduct Systems Planning studies designated by the City Council by Resolution. Designation of expenditure of funds available from the Systems Develop- ment Fee shall be made by the City Council. Funds may be accumulated for expect- ed future expansion costa. SECTION 6: Severability If any section, sub - section, sub- division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in the Ordinance, or any part thereof, Is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall-not affect the validity of the remaining sections or portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, sub - section, sub - division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub- sections, sub - divisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be de- clared invalid or unconatitutioral. dad �T C C SECTION 7• shall attest co the Game' Mayor 'bull sign this Ordinance and the City within fifteen ' City Clerk shall causu the aame Co eC3crk newspaper of sera days after its pasuage, at least once in The Daily Report, and alrcule ted'inr the 'City lofiRancjo Published In the City of Ontarla, �algfomie,a ramonga, California. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ------ _, 1979. AYES: NOES: ASSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor of tha C1t11 of Rancho Cucamonga • -A t N s ( RESOLUTION NO. 71-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SETTING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE _jr 1_OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA. -fie City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby does resolve as follwss WHEREAS, Ordinance No. / of the City of Ta Cho Cucamonga provides for the collection ourteSfor"cepi allimprovementsobyrruquiringrnew development equitable funding to "buy into" the pie'aw encsCvillinfrastructurnw davelopmentppand o nev growth on existing P UHERFAS, Ordinance No. ill _ requires that every applicant for a building Resoluti on the Pay a eveloment Fee mount set by NON. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Citv of Rancho Cueamonva sets a System Development Fee equal to one percent (lx) of the esLimated building _ permit valuation of a building and that PuYmefrae ani all building e 1pemrmic fees shall levied bomade onstruction ofysaid building. y ALSO. B7 IT RESOLVED that funds collected under this fee may be utilized for the following studies: Preparation of subarea traffiways studies to establish specific ,Erect standards. Precise alignment plans for major and secondary thoroughfares. ATTEST: Specific Urban Design Plms for Special Boulevards Establishment of City improvement standards and specifications. multimodal Tranoportation Element Studies. PASSED, AADOPTED ED AND ADOPT THIS __—day of mayor of the CLty of Anacho Cuca¢onga City Clerk 2b d CITY OF RAWW CUCAMWCA )MORARDOM Datet April 4, 1979 To: city council and city Manager Prom: Jack Lam, Director of Ccamunity Development Subject: ANOMMEMI TO 'IRE CITY'S 201 SCROM PEE O=19L1CC At the previous city Council meeting, the Council directed staff to prepare an amendment to the 201 Ordinance to include Isvgsage from SB201 that -mould allow the dedication of land in lisp of pay- ment of fees. please find attached the ordinance mendmanc that would fmplemeat the same Respectful y luhaitted, r JACK LAM, Director of Comunity Development 9 JL:m l03 _ • f _Y�o. j ORDINANCE NO. 74 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FORULA, AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 30, WHICH PERTAINS TO THE FINANCING OF INTERIM SCHOOL FACILITIES, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE DEDICATION OF LAND IN LIEU OF FEES. The City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia, does ordain as fellOws: SECTION 1: Section 8(c) of Ordinance No. 30 of the City of Ran o Cucamonga, California, as amended by Ordinance No. 69, is hereby amended to read as follows: -(c) The City Ccnncil may require the dedication of land in lieu of fees, or a portion thereof, with respect to any subdivision containing more than fifty (50) parcols.". SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Cler shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the came to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Dail Report, a newspaper Of general circulation, pub: +saed in tiie - City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, •PROILTM and ADOPTED this _ day Of , 197. AYES: NOES: AE:'ENT: ATTEST: C ty Cer Mayor of t o city of Rancho Cucamonga I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: April d, 1979 To: City Council aad City Manager From: Jack Lem, Director of Cemunity Development Subject: AMENDMEMf TO CURRENT MORATORIUM ORDINANCE Please find attached an amendment to the current moratorium ordinance which would allow the City to process a parcel map where only one buildable parcel can result, thereby allowing opportunities for single home builders to proceed The amendment includes the para- graph that the City Council concurred with at the previour City Council meeting Respectfully iubmltted, I JACK LAN, Director of Community Development JL:'m 166 MEN 0 ORDINANCE No. 73 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 64 TO EXEMPT PARCEL MAPS WHERE ONLY ONE (1) NEW DWELLING UNIT CAN RE- SULT FROM THE MORATORIUM ESTADT.IRFtED BY ORDINANCE No. 64, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal: - fornia, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 3 of Ordinance No. 64 is hereby amended to read as ollows: °SECTION 3: The City shall not ac- • cept�or �ilinq any parcel map for residential development, provided, however, that this section shall not - apply to residential parcel raps whore only one (1) new dwelling unit can result.'. SECTION 2: This Ordinance is hereby declared an urgency measure necessary for the immediate protection and preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and welfare for the reasons stated in Ordinance No. 64, and shall take effect immediately up- on its adoption. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Cler s a 1 attuat to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fift&en (15) days after its • passage at least once in The Dail Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the qty of Ontario, California, and cir- culated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 1979. APPROvED and ACOPTPD this _ day of AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor o t e C ty o Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: C ty C erk I CITY nF RANCNO CUCIVONGA MENORAIMUH Date: April 4. 1979 To: City Manager and City Council From: Jack Lao, Director of Community Development Subject: ANEICH DT TO THE 20NIM ORDINANCE REGARDING REGULATIONS OF H= OCCUPATIONS At the last City Council meeting, certain structural problems were • found in the draft of the Ordinance establishing a" home occupa- tion regulations. This Ordinance has been reviewed by the City _ Attorney and the structural errors corrected. The Ordinance is back before the City Council for first reading Staff recommends that the City Council adopt first reading of this corrected ordinance. Real � c fu actor ed, JACK LAM, Dire of Community Development JL: m • ORDINANCE NO. 72 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTION 61.024A(b)(3), AMENDING AND DDING 1.02 9(a)(9)IOF THE SAN BERNARRD NO COUNTYN CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE REGULATION OF HONE OCCUPATIONS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That portion of Section 61.022 of the San Bernar no County Code which defines Home occupation' is hereby amended to read as follows: .Home Occupation". An accessory occupational uea conducted • by a resident of a dwelling as a secondary the inhabitants which is conducted entirely within a dwelling by thereof, which use is cleaarnandewhichi does enoteehan4ee structure for dwelling Purposes the character thareo£, and for which sold onsthei display, premises and rem em no stock -in- trade, no commodity conditions: ment used except that necessary for house, no mechanical equipkeeping Purposes and which use meets the following t 1 e dwelling e t use for clearly incidentalndsubordinate to is be shall residential purposes by its inhabitants. 2. No persons other mbers of the familactivityeida such on the premises, shall e -arance Of • 3, There shall b neiortothertvisiblepnvidnnca of o premiss , the uuilding or p the activity. 4. There shall be no sales of products on the premises. - S. Howe Veri1lncidentalruses such as visit as music of such lessons, may be apprdbyftheeDirectortof Community instructions is approved Development. L) S/ 6. No equipment or processes shall be used on the subject property which creates noise, awoke, glare, fumes, odor ' interference disruptive to surroundingdpropertiesvision 7. No home occupation shall be conducted in an accessory ifisuchguse does Normal not obstructgrequir d may parki itted ng. 8. Not more than 158 of the total square footage for the dwelling shall be used for the home occupation. 9. supplies s inlann accessory ebuilding or outside any r any structures. 10. use ith the home occupation Postal e n occupation shallbeedonebymeans on ofta • post office box. 11. homeioccupation band ithere shall be conjunction no advertising using the home address. 12. A home occupation permit ?s not valid until a current City business license is obtained. 13. The use shall not involve the use of commercial vehicles for delivery of materials to or from the premises, other than a vehicle not to exceed a capacity of 3/4 ton, owned by Vie operator of such home occupation which shall be stored in an entirely enclosed garage. 14. If an applicant is not the owner of the property where a home occupation is to be conducted, then a signed statement from the owner approving such use of the dwelling must be submitted with the application. SECTION 2: Section 61.024A(b);3) of the San Bernardino County Code s ere y repealed. SECTION 3: Section 61.0219(a)(9) of the San Bernardino County Code s ereby added to read as follows: 'Section 61.0219(a)(9) - HOME OCCUPATION PERMITS as A. permitted occupations, Section , al purposes p oses upon approval of the Director of Community Development based on the following conditions: l-2- j 1. The use of the dwelling for such home occupation use incidental itse t its inhabitants. 2. on persons, other than s, shall be engaged inesuchiac activity. tivity 3 the building born premises, Sort other tvisible p of evidence of the activity. 4. There shall be no sales of products on the premises. S. ruses aasl visit dwellings. However, incidental such music be if the intensity of such lessons, may permitted instruction is approved by the Director of Community Development. 6. No equipment or_processes shall be used on the subject fumes, odor, property which creates noise, smoke, glare, or television interference vibration, electrical, radio disruptive to surrounding properties. t 7. No home occupation shall be conducted in an accessory itted Ndoeslnot garage d may parki ng ifisue,% use S. Not more `.han 151 of the total square footage of the of the dwelling, which ever Sr less, dwelling o: one room shall be used for the home occupation. 9. The use shall not involve storage of materials or supplies in an accessory building or outside any C structuras. 10• un.ted States with occupation shalllbeedoneebynmeansuoftaon ' post office box. 11. signs shall conjunction h shallbe noadvertisingusing the home address. 12. A home occupation permit is not valid until a current City business license is obtained. 13. The use shall not involve the use of commercial vehicles 7 for delivery of materials to or from the premises, other 3/4 ton, owned than a vehicle not to exceed a capacity of home occupation which shall be by the operator of such stored in an entirely enclosed garage. I alv 14. If an applicant is not the owner of the property where a home occupation is to be conducted, then a signed statement from the owner approving such use of the dwelling must be submitted with the application. Procedure for Approval: Upon acceptance of a home occupation application and fee, as srpci£ied in the Fee Resolution, the Director of Community Development or his designated representative shall review the conditions. within g5e o compliance days fromta above hesubmit al of the application, staff shall post a Notice of Request for a dome Occupation Permit on the subject property and send a copy of the request to all adjacent property owners for public review and input. Following a ten Dev- elopment review shall render�a decision. The decision Community shalle clearly state reasons for approval or denial based upo the above findings. The decision of the Director shall be final unless appealed to the Planning Commission within ten (10) days from his decision. Upon receiving approval from the Director of Community Development or his delegate for a home occupation, the applicant shall immediately make application for a Cit} Business License. City business licenses expire on a yearly basis. If the business license is not renewed within thirty (30) days after expiration, then the home occupation permit shall become null and void. C. Appeal Procedure: Ah Any applicant for a home occupation permit or any person aggrieved by the decision of the Director of Community Development to approve or deny a request for a home occupation permit shall have ten (10) days from the date of the decision to appeal in writing the decision to the Planning commission. Said appeal shall !niicate wherein the decision of the Director was at variance with the required findings as stated in this Section. Any person subsequently aggrieved by a decision of the Planning commission relating to the home occupation permit may appeal said decision in writing to the City Council as provided for above. SECTION 4: The Mayor shall lion this Ordinance and the City Clark shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the f !4I a Y same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, published inothe The C�y oilontao,�CalifornSaerand circulatedrinitheon, at lea City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. g APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1979• t .' AYES: NOESt ABSENT: • MAYOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONrA, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CITY CLERK • i a. �� l I ORDINANCE N0. 71 AN AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CODICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PARKING RESTRICTIONS MR. RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. The City Council of the City of Rancha Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: It shall be unlawful for any person to park or store any house car, trailer, camp trailer, trailer coach, camper or boat upon any public street, highway, or alley within the City for longer than one hour between the hours of two a.m. and six a.m. on any day. SECTION 2: It shall be unlawful for the owner of any house car, trailer, camp trailer, trailer coach, camper or boat to allow the aforementioned to be parked or stored upon any public street, highway or alle, within the City for longer than one hour between the hours of two a.m. and six a.m. on any day. SECTION 3: Any act declared unlawful by the provisions of this Ordinance is an Infraction punishable by fine of twenty -five ($25 00) dollars SECTION 4: All words and phrases used In this Ordinance which are defined 1n the Vehicle Code of the State of California shall have the same meaning in this Ordinance as they have in the Vehicle Code. • SECTION S: The Hayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be Is published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California ATTEST PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of 1979. City Clerk -113 Hayor M E M O R A N D U M Datet March 23, 1979 To: Lauren Wasserman From: Bill Holley Subject: Agenda Item, April 4: Parking Restriction Ordinance for Recreational Vehicles Lauren. dvisory Committee e aproposedeordinance to Counc forth the Citizen il Bob Dougherty has reviewed and approved it as to form The terms used are all as defined in the California Vehicle Code, except "boat" which is not covered. (I doubt, however, that much controversy will occur as to what a boat is ) I suppport the ordinarce, but not from the same ppoirt as the es" This Committee, wnich really seemed. only interested in 'Motor Homes" ordinance would prohibit a campie bwculddprohibittall varieties of left standing in the street AA P trailers from being stored in the street 'rem a staff view, those two items are the real significant points of strength in the proposal. The fine called out in Section 3alsaidealiwithtreserictiva parking Ordinances 27, 34 and 35, Unfortunately, I will be out of town on April 4. Would you please present this agenda item for me? Thanks n l� BHmw iiµ E: MEM0RA11DUM Date: March 12, 1979 To: Citizen's Advisory Committee From: Bill Holley Subject: Parking Ordinances as requested by Citizen Advisory Committee At the February 15 regular meeting of Citizen Advisor/ Committee, a motion was made and adopted to recommend an 'overnight" restriction on recreation vehicle street parking and a 72 hour restriction on street parking on all other licensed vehicles. Further, that County Code, adopted by reference by the City, would be reviewed to see if "ordinances' already existed covering the proposed restrictions. Towards this end, find tie following: 'Overnt ht" Parkin of Recreation Yehicles. Currently, there are no statutes w-li ch prohibit the overn ght street parking or storage of R.V.'s in effect for our City A draft ordinance is attached which will address this proposed restriction _ 2 Hour Restriction on Licensed Vehicles. Section 52.0119 of the San Bernardino County Code states, In part: "No person who owns or has possession, custody or control of any vehicle shall park such vehicle upon any street or alley for more than a consecutive period of seventy -two (72) hours." Additional ordinance coverage in this area is not required Additionally Article XVII of City Ordinance 39, Comprehensive Traffic Control Regulations lsee attached) prohibits the parking of oversize vehicles, which includes motor cars (motor homes), from being parked in the front setback of private property except on driveways or "perpared" aprons between the driveway and the nearer: property line. This is forwarded for Committee's consideration at the Htarch 15 meeting. If you have any questions prior to that time, please give me a call. Attachments: Ordinance No. _, Parking Ordinance for Recreation Vehicle Section 52 0119, S B.Co. Code Article XVII, Ord. 39, City of Rancho Cucamonga cc: Lauren Wasserman, w /att. Jim Robinson, w /att. Lloyd Hubbs, w /att. X15 0 • t d- VEIRCLE REGULi710.Y5 524119 —52.0121 (b) BASIS FOR LIFTING PARKING REGULATIONS. Whenever the Board, upon the basis of a traffic engintering i v splatio t finds sthat t th Se. conditions because of which It was necessary standing or parking of vehicles at all or ce•t21n hours of the day as provided in Section 52.011 g(a) no longer exist, the Board shall by resolution direct the Road Commissioner to remove well signs and curb msrkings from well highways or portion thereof (e) TEMPORARY NO PARKING. Whenever the Road Com nature r determines that traffic congestion or traffic hazati of an energency of vehicles likely to result from the operation. stopping. standing or parking or functions. during the holding of public or private assemblages. 8 improvement or any or during the construction, alteration, repair highway of nh t r be placed, temporary signs prohibiting he Operation - sPP B slanting o parking of . vehicles during the existence of such emergency. 52.0119 Use of Streets for Storage of Vehicles Prohibited. (a) No person who owns or has possession, eustod i or control of any vehicles shall park such vehicle upon any street or ailef for more than a consecutive period of seventy -two (72) hours. (b) In the event a vehicle is parked or Ieft standing upon a street in excess of a consecutive period of seventy -two (72) hours. the Sheriff or any member of the Highway Patrol of the State of California may remove said vehicle from the street in the manner and subject to the requirements of the Vehicle Code. 52.0120 Parking for Certain Purposes Prohibited. No person shall parr a vehicle upon any highway or right-of-way for the principal purpose or, 1 Displaying well vehicle for sale. 2. Washing. greasing. repairing such vehicle ex"Pt repair$ listed by an emergency well vehicle to wppart a sign. aline orders Adjacent r delivering any Commodity' purchaser 3. 4. when 52.0121 Stopping for Loading or Unloading Only. (a) ESTABLISIMIENT OF LOADING ZONES Whenever the Board determines. upon the basis of a traffic engineering Investigation. that loading zones. passenger loading zones or bus loading zones are necessary on any highway or portion thereof. the Board shall by resolution direct the Road Commissioner to place signs or curb markings as provided in Section 52.01'_im on such highway or portion thereof 303 116, N tstal f S• t5 i Ordinance No. 39 ARTICLE XVII OVERSIZE VESICLE PARKING Sectlon 17.0. oversize Vehicles. An oversize vthicle'is any•vehicle, motorized or non -• motorized, that exceeds twenty-£ive (25) feet in length. or a ceeda seven (7) r feet-in width, and /or exceeds seven (7) feet in height. toversize vehicles stall include all buses, truck tractors, semi - trailers, motor trucks. trailera, ? campers, camp trailers, house cars, trailer coaches, and other equipment or - tv:chlnery regardless of width, length, or height. k - 9 Section 17.1. permitted Parking Areas for Oversize Vehicle[ �t oversize vehicles may be parked or stored on private property in all yard areas except the required front yard setback an any side i yard abutting a street right- of-way or as othciwise restricted by City otdlnance. Semi- trailers, camp trailers, campers •nd /or house cars my be parked an the driveway of on an apron in the fron. yard setback located between j+ the driveway and the side p- operty ling closest to the driveway 1f: (1) The trailer or vehicle does not project ever any S Property line; (2) The parking or storage area has a paved or graveled surface; and (3) The area around said trailers and vehicles is kept clean and free of trash, debris and /or parts. He coamecfal oversize vehicle or special purpose vehicle shall be parked or stored In any portion of any yard area. 117 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM s DATE: April 4, 1913 TOe City Council & City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer sUDJECT, STORM DRAIN FEE ORDINANCE Attached for Council review and execution is the revised copy of the Ordinance adopting Drainage Plans and Drainage Fees. • 'he revised Ordinance Ims been drafted to comply witt direction received from the Council at it's March 21, 1979 meeting. Attached for reference is the staff report dealing with the identified issues and a copy of the original Ordinance. - Major additions to the Ordinance are as follows: 1. Section 3 required that payment of fees may be made a condition of a Director Review, Site Approval, Development plan approval or a Conditional Use Permit. 2. Section 3b requires payment of fees at the time of issuance of a building permit. 3 Section 4c incorporates the Following 13nguage. 4 (b) Except as otherwise provided in this Ordinance the fee shall be based on the area of the entire parcel with respect to which the building permit is issued. 4 (c) If the parcel with respect to which the bui,ding permit is issued is larger than one acre, the fee shall be based on the greater of M an area of one acre; or the area of the developed portion of the parcel. As used in this Ordinance, the phrase 'area of the developed portion of the parcel" means the area of that portion of the parcel lying within a single rectangle which encloses all improve - menu, landscaped areas, storage areas, parking areas, required access and required setback lines. (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4 (c) (2) of this Ordinance, the fee shall not be based upon that portion of the area of the developed portien of the parcel which was developed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance and which refrains , unchanged, provided, however, that this exception shall not apply once the total area of additions to structures, or new s structuras, constructed after the effective date of this Ordi- nance, exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the area of the structures f on the parcel which existed on the effective date of this Ordinance. 4 i Storm Drain Fee Ordinance Page 2 April 4, 1979 4 (d) cons dered the fee for which the Briefly this allows the Building Official to establish the fee payment based on the portion defined to with a one acre minimu —the e developed portion has been to Where additions are being rude to existing facilities, the fee sh,11 be based only upon the added area until such time as additions exceed 50: of the area of the structures existing on the entire effective requirementsaofe payment the Ordinance 4. Section 6 has been rewritten to except the following: a alterations; b reconstruction; c an addition to a single family residence when the addition does not exceed 650 square feet in area: storae idi construction spas, andcsimilar.structures� ,iaccessoryatoo covers, asingle family residence 5 Section 8 was added to clarify provision for crediting of fees and rein - bursement that with andsshouldibenadopted Ordinance readings the Respectfully submitted, is uLOYD HUB8S City Engineer LH:deb attachments I (q ORDINANCE NO. 75 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OFBDRAINAGE FEES DRAINAGE N PLAN AND CONNECTION THEREWITH- The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain ss follows: SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose. The City of Rancho Cucamonga 1s seriously affected by surface and storm waters and the continual subdivision • and development of property within t h he City placed a serious demand on existing facilities which handle surface and storm removal plan he order able manner for the apportionment of the cost of the development of such facilities, the City Council does determine that a drainage Plan must be adopted and a drainage fee established provide funds to be used for the construction of the facilitie es described in the drainage plan. SECTION 2: Drainage Plan and Local Area. The comprehensive storm drain plans numbers 1 and 2, the index thereto and the appropriate plan sheets for the area lying within the City Limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, together with construction costs and other related material, which comprehensive storm drain plans were prepared • by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, are hereby found and declared to be the drainage plan for the City Of Rancho Cucamonga. For the purposes Of thin Ordinance, planned The City Council findsdthat adrainageiproblems iare happr ximately an. of equal magnitude in all areas of the City, and declares that for the purposes one ss Of this ordinance, e all areas of the City shall eon - SECTION 3: Payment of Fees. (a) As a condition of approval of reviews, mitt a parcel map, the waiver of a parcel map, approval, location and development plan, conditional use permit, or the is of a building permit, the City shall require the payment of a fee as is hereafter provided for the purposes of de drainage facilities for the removal of surface and storm wa- fraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing p ters from the local drainage area. The City Council finds that develop- ment of property within the local drainage area will require cen- un the facilities describe i drainage Plan, abasis ofbenfisaconferred the fees are at 12© on the property in the local drainage area and on the need for such facilities created by the proposed division or development of property in tl:e local drainage area. The City Council further finds that the fee as to any property does not exceed the pro rata share of the amount of the total actual or estimated cost of all facilities pursuant to the drainage plan which would be assessable on any parcel of property if such costs were apportioned on a per acre basis. (b) Fees required to be paid by this ordinance shall be paid at the time of issuance 0 f pa building permit. SECTION 4: Amount of Fee. (a) The fee required to be paid by this Ordinance is $25.00 per 1 /100th of an acre or fraction thereof. (b) Except as otherwise provided in this • Ordinance the fee shall be based on the area of the entire parcel with respect to which the building permit is issued. _ (c) If the parcel with respect to which the building permit is issued is larger than one acre, the fee shall be based on the greater of (1) an area of one acre= or (2) the area of the developed p..rtion of the parcel. As used in this Ordinance, the phrase "area of the developed portion of the parcel" means the area of that portion of the parcel lying within a single rectangle which encloses all improvements, landscaped areas, storage areas, parking areas, required access and required setback lines. (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4(c)(2) of this Ordinance, the fee shall not be based upon that portion of the area of the developed portion of the parcel which was developed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance and which remains unchanged, provided, however, that this exception shall not apply once the total area of additions to structures, or new structures, constructed after the effective date of this Ordinance, exceeds fifty percent (501) of the area of the structures on the parcel which existed on the effective date of this Ordinance. (d) The amount of the fee and :he area for which the foe shall be considered paid shall be determined by the building official. SECTION 5: Oeposit and Utilization of Fee. The fee required to be paid by this Ordinance shall be deposited in a "planned drainage facilities fund" and shall be expended solely for the construction or reimbursement for the construction of drainage facilities pursuant to the ( 'ZI drainage plan or to reimburse the City for the costs of engineering, planning and administrative services to establish, design and con- struct the plan and facilities up to twenty -five percent (25%). Initial funds collected may be utilized for cpecific planning and engineering studies as designated by resolution of t),e Citv Council. SECTION 6: Exce :ions. Drainage fees shall not be required as a condition of the issaance of a building permit for: (a) alterations; (b) reconstruction; (c) an addition to a single family residence when the addition does not exceed 650 square feet in area= (d) construction of garages, carports, storage buildil:gs, patio covers, swimming pools, spas, and r similar structures, accessory to a single family residence. SECTIOv 7: Single Drainage Fee Payment. - No portion of a parcel shall be subject to payment o: a drainage fee more than once. If a drainage fee has been pre%rously paid with respect to a parcel, or portion thereof, ti nmentf shallebe ado, toward prior ny and a thisr Ordinance. SECTION 8: Construction by Developer and Reimbursement. whenever the construction of planned drainage facilities is necessary for the proper drainage of a subdivision, the City may require the subdivider to construct such facilities wit): credit being given by the City toward any fee payment required by this Ordinance. If the cost of such construction exceeds the fee which would otherwise be payable with respect to the sub- division, the City Council may, at its discretion, enter into a reimbursement agreement with the developer. In the event a reimbursement agreement is entered into, reimbursement shall be mnde only after the fee required by this Ordinance is collected in connection with a subdivision or development on other property in the area encompassed by the reimbursement boundaries described in the reimbursement agreement. The basis of reimbursement shall be the developer's actual cost of construction of the planned drainage facilities. The term of a reimbursement agreement shall SECTION 9: Severability. If any section, sub - section, sub- division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in this Ordinance, (jr any part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconsti- tutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the re- maining sections or portiora of this Ordinance or any part -33- - SECTION 10t The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City clershalT attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily. a newspaper of general circulation, published t�ity of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. APPROVED and ADOPTED thin _ day of 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: city clerk Z z3 Mayor of the city of Rancho Cucamonga 41 • I] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 21, 1979 TO: city Council 8 City 1'anager FR0,4, Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUEJECT: STORM DRAIN AND SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEES drainage plans and established a Drainage fee and At the March 7, 1979 meeting of the City Council, actions were taken to rescind Ordinance No. 53 adopting continuing second reading on Ordinance 6bamendprovisa�e o Development tmfurther The council at that time, indicated discomfort with provisions of the storm Drain Ordinance and wished staff to explore possible information prior to adoption. The primary feature of the Ordinance 1s of course the acreage m c 8,000,00 acre This was derived from a division of the est•cutte system cost of 538,000,000 by 15,000 acres of developable land. As has been pointed out previously- mately 6.250 acres within the City are currently developed Lands upon which the fee can reasonably be expected amounts to 8,750 acres. If all this land developed by Grants, within the year, the City would collect $21,875,000. The remainder of the 538,000nts or $16,125,000 will have to be obtained through alternative funding sources ni Assessment Districts, etc The fee as proposed covers tiie entire City recognizing the collective rows. et drainage problems and divides the cost equitably throughout the City int In addition tothenfeeforot uncilecons identified the following issues co - ideration 1. ORDINANCE Fees are to be collected at the time of recordation of a Parcel Map ISSUE For example, collection at this time will inordinately burden the small acreage sing developer who would wish to divide a 5 acre parcel into lots to develop a single merely for who rpurpose would also burden large land divisions in industrial areas house. This OROINANIC ADVANTAGES opment of sto,,n drain systems prior to extensive Early fee collection and devel development ORDINANCE DISADS scourage small development and procedural Will create hardships which will di land divisions- 1 Zt City Council b City Manager Page 2 March 21, 1979 Eliminate payment of fee on the vacant parcels of a parcel map. 2. ORDINANCE PROVISION Fees are to be collected on a parcel basis at the issuance of a building permit on any portion of the parcel. ISSUE Provisions should be made to assess the fee for only the portion of the parcel being developed. • ORDIIANCE ADVANTAGES The assessor's parcel provides a clear division for the unbiased calculation of fees and allows for case of record keeping ORDI?4AIICE DISADI'•NTAGES g feesroutsofnpr -p rtionewithpthetconstructionnactivityQui re payment of drain- age A. The property owner could parcel the property to reduce the fee for the developed portion. B The Ordinance could allow the fee to be calculated by the Building Official based on established guidelines. This system would resolve this issue official of benefit in property owners 3 ORDINANCE PROVISION Drainage fees shall not be required as a condition of the issuance of building permit of suchfalterations, reairs or remodeling of less than $10.000 re the costs ISSUE That the limit is too low and will burden existing home owners to pay the fee on minor additions ORDIIIAIICE ADVANTAGES This provision is the only provision of the Ordinance which allows assessrant of fees to existing development lany complaints from the Community dealt with the fact that new development will be punished and older development enhanced by the fee. 1 ��5 City Courcil d City tanager Page 3 March 21, 1979 ORDIMICE DISADVANTAGES Minor additions will be increased in cost and the homeowner required to accept additional burden. ALTERNATIVES A The limit remain as is. B. Raise the tower limit C Incorporate the following language. 1 This section shall not apply to additions made to single family residerce where the square foot area of such addition does not _ exceed fifty percent of the area of the residential portion of the building existing prior to addition. 2 This section shall not apply to alterations made to a single family residence when the value of the proposed alterations not exceed fifty percent of the value of the building being altered prior to its alteration 3 This section shall not apply to constructica of or additions to garages, carports, storage building and similar non - residential buildings, accessory to single family residences where such con- struction or addition does not exceed 500 square foot in area. NOTE: The language in C does not include exemptions for alterations • to commercial and industrial alterations 4. ORDINANCE PROVISION The Ordinance applies uniformly to commercial, industrial and residential development ISSUE Special consideration should be given to industrial lands to maintain a com- petitive relation in the industrial land market to attract taxes and jobs provided by industry. ORDINANCE ADVANTAGES The industrial area currently has unique drainage problems seriously effecting the developability of the land. The area is located in the southern portion of the City and subject to runoff from all northern areas and therefore bear a disproportionate share of drainage problems The current Ordinance and fee • structure already spreads a portion of those costs to the residential cornu- nity. Further distribution of those costs would overburden residential lz� City Council d city (tanager Page 4 Itarch 21, 1979 development. Alternative sources of financing would not recognize properly the benefits of industrial development to the City as a whole and would unduly burden industrial lands. ORDINANCE DISADVANTAGES Any fee on industrial would effect the market value of industrial land and potentially the timing of development. RECO[WENDATION Retain fee and Ordinance as proposed. S. ORDINANCE PROVISION There is no specific provisions in the Ordinance to allow credit against fees to be paid. ISSUE All drainage improvements constructed in conjunction with development should be credited to the fee ORDIIIANCE ADVANTAGES Although specific language in the Ordinan_e does not deal with this issue, the authority to provide credits is implicit in the Ordinance. It was the intent to credit development for Lne construction of itaster Planned Facilities as adopted by the Council • Local drainage improvements not shown on the Master Plan and not considered to the fee development would not be credited. RECOMIDIDATION The Ordinance should be revised to provide specific definitions to allow credits for [taster Planned Facilities. 6 ISSUE Prior to establishment of fees all other funding resources should be exhausted. RESPONSE Thre fees as proposed will only construct a portion of the system as discussed previously. ai ,ar.0 requiredcomplete ttrstem n todaysdolrs. Funds thatare available aren=petit ithohe agencies and highly limited. These funds should be pursued vigorously but do not represent a full solution to the problem or a short tern response to the problems presented by growth pressure IZ7 City Council b city iianager Page S March 21, 1979 SYSfE16 OEVELOMM FEE The Council at its February 71 1979 meeting, Passed the First Reading of postponed !Y tithe February � Development pmeentn9�.Tbt�ee Reading dessigned tos provide Ordinance and ljW aayz Projects necessitated by current and future eevelopvrnt. Staff has rot at this time received feedback to indicate any concerns with this fee diroisston on thtsissuc . if the Council has concerns, we would appreciate any revenue the Simply, for street osve the staff ed . n- ieuof the proposed eenptld the current needs hasita�� j fee, ro fun s will be aratlable far icps�esnu other than unusual maintenance. fie Yty will 6e amble to is the level of road maintenance service and con- , tined growth in traffic volumes oh seriously deficient strects would be irrespon- sible. Respectfully submitted- LLOYIT MBOS City Engineer LH;deb 0 12-13, ORDIYAINCE No. 53 AN OROINANCE OF THE CITY C(aNCIL OF THE CITY Or IlA4C110 CUCA90NCA. CALIFOILNI•l. PRnvID1GG FOR T11E FSTABLISIUQNT OF A DRAINACC P"'i AND TRC ESTABLISINENT OF DRAINAGE. FEES 14 CONNECTION TIIEREWIT1i AND DECLARINr THE URGENCY THEREOF. -` The City Connell of C.e City of laineho Cucamonga, Cal tfarnln, Idoes ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seriously af- fected by surface and atom waters and the continual subdivision and development of property within the City has placed a serious ?e=nd on existing fac111tieu which handle surface and atom waters In order �• to plan and develop drainage facilities for the removal of surfer- end atom waters and to provide an equitable manner for the apportionment of the cost of the development of such facilities, the City Council does determine that a drainage plan most be adopted and a drainage fee estab- lished to provide funds to be used for the construction of the facilities described In the drainage plan. SECTION 2: Drainage Plan and Local Area. The comprehensive atom drain plans numbers 1 and 2, the index thereto and the appropriate plan sheets for the area lying within the City limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, together with constmetion costs and other related material, which comprehensive atom drain plans were prepared by the San Bernardino County Flood Control DSatrict, are hereby found and declared to be the drainage plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga The City Council t� finds that drainage problems are approximately of equal magnitude in all !r areas of the City, and declares that for the purposes of this Ordinance, all areas of the City shall constitute one local drainage area. SECTION 3• Payment of Fees. As a condition of approval of a final map, a parcel map, the waiver of a parcel mop, or the issuance of a building permit, the City shall require the payment of a fee as Is hereafter provided for the purposes of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing planned drainage facilities for the removal of surface and atom waters from the local drainage area. The City Council finds that development of property within the local drainage area will requlra construction of the facilities described in the drainage plan, and that the fees are fairly apportioned on the basis of benefits conferred on the property In the local drainage area and an the need for such facilities created by the proposed division or development of propn_ty in the local drainage area. The City Council further finds that the fee as to any property does not exceed the pro rata share of the amount of the total actual or estimated cost of all facilities pursuant to the drainage plan which would be assessable an any parcel of property if such costs were apportioned on a per acre basis SECTION 4: Amount of Fee. The fee required to be paid by this Ordinance Is $25 00 per 1 /100th of acre or fracclon thereof. SEMM 5: Deposit and Utilization of Fee. The fee required to he paid by this Ordinance shall he deposited in a "planned drainage facilities fiord" and shat] by expended solely for the construction or egInhursemept for the construction of drninage facilities pursuant to the drainage plan or to retmhurac the City for the costs of engineering and ad.ai:lstrntive services to 12- si Page 2 establish, design and construct the plan anJ facilities up to 252. Initial funds collected may be utilized for specific planning and engineering studies as designated by resolittion of the City Council SECTION 6t Exceptions. Drainage fees shall not be required no a con- dition of the Issuance of a building psmit for alteration, repairs, or remodeling of any building where the coat of such alterations, repairs, or remodeling is estimated at leer than $10,000 00 SECTION 7t Single Drainage Fee Payment. No parcel of land shall be subject to payment of a drainage fee more than once. If any portion of a parcel has previously paid a drainage fee, credit shall be given for each prior payment and a proper apportionment made as a credit toward any fee payment required by this Ordinance. SECTION 8: Urgency. This Ordinance is hereby declared an urgency measure, necessary for the immediate protection and preservation of the public peace, safety, health and welfare of persons and property within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The facto establishing the necessity for such urgency measure are these: Because of the unique physical location of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, surface and atom waters place a serious demand open existing facilities during any atom flaw; the City of Rancho Cucamonga is seriously affected by any atom waters, and in order to plan and develop drainage facilities and to collect fees for the construction of such facilities, the City of Rancho Cucamonga must take steps to immediately implement a drainage fee Ordinance. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption SECTION 9: Severability. If any section, sub- section, sub - division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in this Ordinance, or any parr - thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall net affect the validity of the remaining sections tr portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, sub - section, sub- division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub- section, nub- divistons, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional SECTION 10: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the Cl Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) dais after its passage, At least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City f Rancho Cucamonga, California. J � 3a 0 MEM0RA11DUH DATE: March 28, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lauren H. Wasserma City Manager SUBJECT: Chaffey Joint Union High School District Declaration of Impaction On Wednesday's City Council agenda the Council will be considerinq a _ declaration of impaction filed by the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. In addition to the printed materials dated March 19, 1979, it is anticipated that two amendments will be made prior to the City Council meeting on Wednesday. The School Board will be meeting two days prior to our Council meeting to discuss the proposed amendments By Wednesday you should have the final wording available to you. The amendments are as follows: No. 3. Near the bottom of the page should be reworded as follows: "Use of all bond and State loan revenues to the extent allowed by taw and funds available from other appropriate sources." No 4 (new section which should read as follows ) A "We have studied the possibility of utilizing funds from the sale of surplus assets, and we ha.e determined them to be insufficicnt in and of themselves." LMW:ba f I RESOLUTION NO. 79 -32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING IN THE FINDINGS OF THE CHAFFEY JOINT UNION NIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT CONOiTIONS OF OVERCROWDING EXIST IN SAID DISTRICT. Y WHEREAS, the governing board of the Chaffey Joint Union High School _ District cf San Bernardino County, California, at its regular meeting on March 19, 1979, adopted a motion entitled "Declaration of Impaction" wherein said governing board found and declared that conditions of overcrowding existed in said school district; and I WHEREAS, the governing board of the Chaffey Joint Union High School District has notified the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as required by Government Cede Section 65971; NOW, T,iEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancno Cucamonga, California, does resolve, dete:.oine and ordtr as follows: The City Council concurs in th finds the Doverning board of the Chaffey Joint Union High School District whit ngs are contained in the aforesaid "Declaration of Impaction" for all attendance areas within the Chaffey Joint Union High School District PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this IAday of 1,�,�'_, 1979 by the following roll call vote: °T AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk )3a yor n u HAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - mi M,t FIFTH FIRM. a<ITUIm, UUIMNIA Nno 0 ..,Hr.wr Hn.u„woVm �^ MME Vr%<• G 0 0 0 OA11M, u,.N o rn<w rovra,ww nwvau cuuN rwwr rw cream w.Ne or lvv,n<, .... n. c.<.. w.. r.. e,.«, w<... v.. .w+.....u�..ou....ow.w.n.r.wr«a <ri..oca rew.�w.w..r.<ww• March .6, 1979 Rancho Cucamonga City Council P 0 Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Sirs: The Board of Trustees of the Chaffey Joint Union High School District at its regul�. meeting of Flarchi9, 1979 adopted a revised Declaration of Impaction and directed that it be presented to the Poncho Cucamonga City Council for acceptance per the requirement of Ordinance No. 30. Although steps have been taken to alleviato the overcrowded condition at Alta Loma High School for the school year 1979 -80, we believe impaction or the potential thereof still exit'• and will be compounded by the lifting of the building moratorium and even under the conditions of a growth management plan The projected enrollment of Alta Loma High School during the eighteen months following occupancy of ony new development will exceed its design capacity The enclosed chart of projected enrollments through the school year 1983 -84 should help clarify the situation Please note that a one year growth /loss factor was used in calculating these projections which is based on the moratorium period Thc recent action, which allows the building of $56 homes, would result in some 85 additional students fo= Alta Loma next year. If none of these were fresh- men, it would bring Alta Loma immediately up to maximum capacity This does not take into account those completed and unsold dwellings or those currently under construction As you can see, the relocation of ninth graders next year puts Chaffoy Nigh School at 395 studentb above design capacity and Montclair Ifth School at 4S students above design capacity Upland High School will be at 240 students above design capacity and there still will be room for growth at Ontario High School Please remember these projections arc based on growth /loss experience during the moratorium in Rancho Cucamonga, and would chanyc dramatically if all build- ing restrictions were lif.ed It also should be noted that same 450 high school students living in the south- west area of Rancho Cucamonga attend Chaffey High School and have been since attendance boundaries were redrawn In 1971 -72 Attendaneo boundaries will no doubt have to be changed to seen extent to keep schools near their design capacities which allows for the very best instructional situation. 133 -11-1 Rancho Cucamonga City Council -2- March 26, 1979 However, this must be done in a reasonable manner. Additional facilities to house some 1000 Rancho Cucamonga students would allow for a reasonable re- drawing of attendance areas. The cost of such facilities will be nearly $3,000,000 by the time they could be constructed, placed, and ready of occupancy The suggested "high" fee per home averaged $600 for the high school district This would mean that an additional 5,000 homes would have to be constructed to fund the temporary freshmen high school. These homes would generate 750 high school students leaving the district with a net gain of 250 student spaces housed in temporary facilities Several areas in the state have fees under SS 201 that arc as much as $2,000 per home. \ Iligh school facilities arc more expensive to build than are elementary schools. A reasonable fee for the high school listrict would be $2,000 per single family 40 residence _ 40 This fee should be assessed on each siagio family residence built anywhere with- in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1,500 tomes would yield $3,000,000 while generating only 22S students, hopefully phased over several years Money collected should be impounded by the e'ty and held until such time as the high school district can comply with the requirements of Section 10 of Ordinan.c No 30. We trust the City Council will act favorable in accepting a revised Declaration of Impaction and the establishment of an SO 201 school fee of $2,000 per single family residence Your consideration is deeply appreciated M1)D /gkr Sincerely, F�Q./I(� Dirksen Superintendent CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 0 ell wen null nsee *. orrtssq. "urasYU elnx .u...W, tw...,,..dY.. 0 0 1) 1) 0ANWIM ►e . \ \1Y 0 GY IIY IDV[11�D Y.\ GGOY�G GI CIM11• I' I � �m� ,N DYG ll..l. Lill YyJOd l.N lilt .utdor u . G+.J awn s ail wtt Ft ar'_ ..... ... . ... ..vOV .11. O grMaNV _w I C .tiw March 19, 1979 DECLARATION OF IMPACTION Pursuant to Government Code Section 65971 and Section 4 of Ordinance 30 of the City at Rancho Cucamonga, the Board of Trustees of the Chaffey Joint Union High School District submits to the City Council this Notification of Condition of Overcrowding. The duclsion to file this Notification of Condition of overcrowding is based on the followings 1 overcrowding exists duo to the occupation of newly constructed homes creating an enrollment in excess of the design capacity of the school 2 Alta Loma High School was designed to accommodate 1600 students Peak enrollment folb 1978 -79 exceeded 2600 3. In attempting to alleviate this pioblem the District installed 20 relocitable clean - rooms on the same site. Even with these increased facilities maximum capacity 1s only 2100 students. The 20 relocatebles should not be counted in the design capacities because there are inadequate support facilities, causing curricular restriction. 4. The District is currently operating a 10- period day schedule at Alta Lom High School in order to survive these unfortunate conditions S. For the school year 1979 -80 all ninth graders from the Alta Loma attendance area will attend other district schools there still will be over 2000 tenth- twelfth grade students on campus The condition of impaction, as defined by SB 201 and Ordinance 30, still exists. 6 Recant art.on by the City Council to lift restrictions on home building will further impact Alta lama High School Tde school could be forced into an extended day session for 1980 -61, with only grades 10 -12 on campus The Chaffey Joint Union High School District has reviewed all practical and reasonable • methods for mitigating overcrowded conditions Including the following, 1 Use of relocatable structures and trailars to the extent feasible with District finances and site space and in considering the load on support facilities 2. Major realignment of all school boundarius was considered, discussed, and partially implemented 3 Use of all local bond and state loan revenues to the extent allowed by law. All reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding have boon evaluated, some implemented, and no further feasible method for reducing such conditions exists There are currontly no clasaroomn used for non- instructional purposes There are currently no agreements bet von the Chaffey Joint Union High School District and any residential developer whereby temporary-use buildings will be leased to the school district. 13� CJ March 1979 Cj0 rMy JOINT UNION NICN SCHOOL DISTRICT projections based on October 1978 enrollments using growth /1-059 oxpericnco factor for one year period, October 1977 to October 1978 79 -80 • Design- capacity is datorvinod to be apProxieately 90% of maximum capacity. •• Figures in parenthesco in the first column indicate enrollment& through movement of the ninth grade students. 134 i MEMORANDUM DATE: March 28, 1979 TO: City Council FRO14: Harry Empey Director of Finance SUBJECT* Census We have received a revised estimate from the State Department of Finance for conducting the census Unfortunately, their first estimate is con- siderably lower than the revised Below is a brief summary of the projected expenses necessary to conduct the census _ Paid to Department of Finance: Fee b Card Processing ... .... 1,428.00 1,428 00 Paid Directly by City: Salaries.. ... ... .. ... 35,784 00 Office Equipment.., ... ... 1,189 00 Office Supplies /Printing . .... 479.00 Utilities ... ... .... . . . . .. 450.00 Leases (Office b Vehicle) .... 354.00 38 256.00 Total 3654 66 10% Safety Factor 3,968.00 GRAND TOTAL 43.652.00 • The increase is due to the requirement for more enumerators, one additional crew leader and the increase in the number of housing units that will be surveyed To alleviate any apprehensions you may feel at this point, it would do well to point out some of the financial advantages of the cem,:s For example; at our current population of 40,470 the City will recetre $625,600 for Motor Vehicle in Lieu Fees. With our improved population fi3ure of 50,000 due to the census, the City will receive $773,000 This is an increase of $147,400 for just one fiscal year Another example is Gas Tax; at our current population for both :.106 and 2107 the City will receive $375,400 With our improved population 'iqure the City will receive $464,000 This is an increase of $88,600 Between these two areas,flotor Vehicle in Lieu, and Gas Tao, this City could realize an additional $236,000 next fiscal year k, There are othar fees affected by population; most notably is the 5 B. 325 money received because of the presence of Omnitrans These funds will be used to up- E :' .. 137 ,. 0 Census March 28, 1919 Page Two grade roads and bridges in the City RECOMMENDATI0M: It is recommended to appropriate the remaining portion ,)f the reserve for contingency for the purpose of conducting the census. This amount is $20,000. HE:ba 13S/ MEMORANDUM DATE: March 29, 1979 TO City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager , SUBJECT: Setting Fees for Subscriptions Within tae to and minutes The cost to the city has been substantial not only in actual dollars, but in the amount of time required from employees to copy, collate, and mail the agendas as requested. The staff has adopted a policy that agendas will be sent providing the city receives pre- addressed, stamped envelopes from those who request the material Because substantial costs PlannPnid ^ copies s staff has minutes has approxiate cost for tto tno e erequestings re, materials on a regular basis as follows: AGENDAS- City Council. 87 r ,,, 5.00/ 001yy Planning Commission.. .. .. ... 7 Combined Council d Commission .. .. 17.50 /yr. • MINUTES- City Council ... •••• $25.00 /Yr Planning Commission .... ... .. 25.00 /Yr Combined Council E Commission. ..... .. 55.00 /3r MINUTES ILND AGENDAS- $35 00 /yr. City Council ••• 35 00 /yr. Planning Commission.. .. Combined Council L Commission .. 70.00 /yr. RECOI-MENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 79 -31, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, setting certain fees for the annual subscription of Lity Council, an City Planning Commission agendas and /or minutes Utd:baa 1:37 RESOLUTION N0, 79 -31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CUT OF fJ4'tCIID CUCA'fOTGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING CERTAIN FEES FOR T@i AWMAL SUBSCRIPTION OF CITY COUNCIL VID PLAMM UBNISSIGA AGENDAS ANV /OR MUTES. The City Council of the City of Raxho Cnxam np does bere!Yj resolve as follows: NHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 657, L City Cay ispose a fee for the duplication of identifiable public records to recover costs of duplication of public records, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Gover=cnt Code !Pirtioa 6257, a city ray impose a fee to recover the cost of duplicating identifiable public records, and 40 MHEREAS, the city council of the City of Random eoramon3a seers it desirable and necessary to set-an ammo] subsMption rate for those public - records that are produced on a consistent basis. NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED, that the following annual charges are established for certain public records for the City of Mu sho Cu^ : City C ouncil ........... .....................S1S.00 /Yr. Planning Coomissicn ......................... 7.50 /yr. Combined Council and C=Ission ............. 17.01yr. MINUTES: City C ouncil ............................... $25.03/yr Planning Cem issfon ........................ 3i.W /Yr. Combined Council and Comisston............ 55.00 /yr. MINUTES AND AGEROxS: City C ouncil ......................... ......535,00 /yr. Planning C amaission ......................... 50.00 1yr. Combined Council and Ce®ission ............. 70,00 1yr, PASSED, APPROVED, and 'ZGVrW this day of , 1974. CITY OF RAIM) C1Y9 t ATTEST: µ — City C er , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MMRAVDU?1 Date: April S, 1979 To: City Council From: Jack Lon, Director of Community Development Subject: ESTABLISPYEhr OF GENERAL. PLAN AMENDMENT DATE Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 6, Section 65361 of the State Goverment Code states: No mandatory Element of the Central Plan shall be amended more frequently than three times during any calendar year which mandment or amendments may occur at any time as determined by the leglslntive body. This section shall not apply to the adoption of any Blements to the General Plan" The purpose of marling the Elements of the General Plan is to keep the Elements current with the times. Ctnnges in population, goals, development practices and the like affect the purpose and direction of the General Plan. Therefore, it is necessary that each year we examine the Ele- ments of the Cenc.al Plan in order to insure that they are still reason- able in their projections and main attainable goals and objectives The Interim Lead Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Element of the General Plan was adopted by the City Council on February 7, 1979. It is now necessary for the City to establish dates for which amendments to the General Plan may be considered The reason for the establishment of specific dates for consideration of General Plan amendments is to allow the staff opportunity to prepare the necessary background and • information for the Planning Commission and City Council to consider, in their dcciaion-making process. It should be noted that each mand- ment hearing may encompass =to than one particular Stem. It is quite possible that three, four or more items may be considered as part of one General Plan Amendment. Generally, staff's procedure when there are many items for consideration under one Central Plan Amendment would be to prioritize those items in the order which the Commission desires to hear them and schedule than over a period of Commission meetings as may be required The a ®o procedure could, and possibly would, occur at the City Council level. OPTIONS: The following options for scheduling of General Plan Amend - "ate are presented for your deliberation: 1. Establish three dates for General Plan Amendmenta. 2. Establish two General Plan Amendment dates and hold the third General Plan Amendment hearing for City purposes. 141 Establiuhaent of General Plan Amendment Dotes April 4, 1979 Page 2 3 Establish one General Plan Amendment date, while reserving the additional two Ceneral Plan Amendments for CAy purposes. Each of the options presented have the advantage of providing a hearing date or dates to avail the public the opportunity to request General Plan Amendments. Since there is a great pobaibility that each General Plan Amendment will have a great number of request,, it follows that the mount of work will Increase proportionate with the amber of General Plan Amendment hearings available. After re,,iewing the three options presented, the Commission felt that option amber two would be most advantageous to the City and to the Staff. The Commission Resolution establishing the General Plan Amendments for 1979 and beyond is attached. You will noLJ that in 1979 the General Plan Amendment dates are different than they wil, be in 1980 and beyond. RECOtMMATION: It Is recommended that A General Plan hearing dates as outlined Reaper fully ittcd, JACK LAM, Director of Comm:.nity Develoment JL: BKH::m Attachment: Resolution No. 79 -27 City Council Resolution • the City Council establish two in the attached Resolution. t1 ✓!- RESOLUTION NO. 79 -27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OT THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING THL ESTABLISH- MENT OF ANNUAL GENERAL PLAN AhMMENT ltdARING DATES TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, State law allows cities to establish a maximum of three times in any calendar year for Amendments to the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Cemmiaslon has reviewed the options presented to them; and desires an orderly General Plan Amendment process; .nd WHEREAS, the Planning Commission feels that the public should be allowed to apply for General Plan Amendment; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the C.cy Council establish _ General Plan Amendment hearing dates and deadlines for submittal as follows: SECTION 1: For the calendar year of 1979: A. The second meeting of the Planning Commission in the month of June shall be established as a General Plan Amendment hearing date The decd - line for submittal shall be no later than 5:00 p.m on April 70. 1979. B. The second meeting of the Planning Comml esion in the month of September shall be established ao a General Plan amendment hearing date. The dead- line for submittal shall be no later than 5:00 • p.m. July 15, 1979. SECTION 2: For the calendar years following 1979: A. ThoaecoM meeting of the Planning Con!aalon in thr month of January Shall be established as a General Plan Amzndment hearing date. The deadline for submittal shall be no later than 5:00 p.m. November 15 B Theaccond meeting of the Planning Commission In the month of September shall be established as a General Plan Amendment hearing date. The deadline for submittal shall be no later than 5 p.m , July 15 C. In the event the deadline for submittal falls on a weekend, the following Monday shall be the deadline. ) �3 i?! SECTION 3: In the event an eWimamc2tal impact report is required , for any amendment app at the next scheduled general plan amendment Ants after completion of the EIM. APPROVED Ah9 ADOPTED MIS 28TH DAY OP NARCII, 1979 PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY:— HER4AN RF124'EL Haman R�Pe , Ch ATfESTt Secretary of tha Planning Commission 1, JACK LAN, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution vas duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of at a the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ofMarch,r1979,rbycthen follo ing Plannine n e ion held on the 28tn day my AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GARCIA. DAIM, JONES, TOLSTOY, RENPEL NOES: CMIMISSIOENRS: NONE ABSENT: C@4ISSIONERS: NONE I4+ vE RESOLUTION No.79 -30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA ESTABLISUINi7 APN'JAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT HEARING DATES WHEREAS, State law allows cities to establish a maximum of three times in any calendar year for Amendments to the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the options presented and recommendation of the Planning Commission; and desiras an orderly General Flan Amendment process; and WHEREAS, the City Council feels that the public should be allowed to apply for General Plan Amendment; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEn THAT the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby establish "General Plan Amendment hearing dates and - deadlines for submittal as follows: v_N S SECTION 1. For the calendar year of 1979: A. The 2:d meeting of the Planning Commission in the month of June shall be established as a General Plan Amendment hearing data The dead- line for submittcl shall be no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 30, 1979. B. The 2nd meeting of the Planning Cow Isslon in the month of September shall be established as a General Plan Amendment hearing date The dead- line for submittal shall be no later than 5:00 p.m. July 15, 1979. SECTION 2. For the calendar years following 1979: A. The' 2nd meeting of the Planning Commission in the month of January shall be established as a General Plan Amendment hearing date. The deadline for sub - rittal shall be no later than 5:00 p.m. November 15. B. The 2nd meeting of the Planning Commission in the month of September shall be es:abllshad as a Ceneral Plan Amendment hearing dats The deadline for sub- mittal shall be no later than 5 p.m. July 15. C. In the event the deadline for submittal fails on a weekend, the following Nanday shall be the deadllna. L� 0 SECTS for .ny ®eat an daene aPPl lcatlno.e a%dehe, = shall be report is held at the n"t cP hel �R eaetal plan a�andeenc date a£tet comp ADOPTED this � day Of _�� 1979. PASSED. APPROVED' � AYES: TOES* ABSENT: ATTEST: City Cletk ,J Hayot CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ML40RANDUH Date: April 4, 1979 To: City Council Prom: Jack Lam, Directer of Community Development Subject: CITY/COUNTY rGLICY FOR COORDINATION OF PLANNING ACTIVITIES ABSTRACT: Recently the City has had problems with timely notification about projects within the planning area of Rancho Cucamonga. Specifically, thes. are projects Chit are outside of the corporate boundaries of the City . but at 111 within our planning area. Authority for approval and denial of these projects lien viti the County of San Bernardino Regarding this situation, the Planning Directors of San Bernardino County have been working toward the development of a coordination polity for planning activities. At the March 2, 1979 meeting of the Planning Director's Committee, the City /County Policy for Coordination of Planning Activities was adopted unanimously by those members present This item was presented to the Planning Commission on March 14, 1979 at which time it ruceived unanimous recaeendation for approval. Attached please find a copy of that Resolution approved by the Planning Commission. It is both the Planning Commission and Staff's opinion that this policy will be a major step forward to resolving the recent problems that have plagued the City in the past. The policy goes beyond the timely notification to the point where our General Plan would supercede the County's General Plan. Addl- • tionally, it abould be noted that in the proposed Consolidated General Plan and Implementation System of San Bernardino County, Section 1, Chapter 2, Issue 8 entitled, Intergovernmental Coordination essentially incorporates thls proposed City /County Policy for Coordination of Planning Activities. If the City Council adopts the proposed Resolution attached, we will then forward this report to the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors for their mutual adoption RECWHENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the City /County Policy for Coordination of Planning ktivities a Re peer efu ly subm itted. .. , Di actor4� Community Development JL:BRH:nm Attachment: Planning t- ,mlasioz Resolution No. 79 -22 City Councl. Resolution W` 0 RESOLUTION N0. 79 -22 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C"'SSION AOFRTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAJONGA ItECONNENU INO OF THE CLTY /COUNTY POLICY FOR COORDINATION OF PLANNING ACTIVITIES WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Co_lssion has great concern projects within tha City-, planning area, and; regarding WHEREAS, there have been problems in coordimlion of planning activities in the past. and; WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to create strong lines of co®mni- cation betwesn the City and the County, and; NOW, TNSREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Courty Policy fore Coordinatiioon the attached EW Planning Activities, toktho city tCouncil / for adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 1979 PLA;;NINC COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commiaaion of the City Oe ,Rnnihe introduced. do hereby certify that the foregoing Conilution wo the C�:y of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning passed , and odop[ad by at a regular meeting of the planning Comaission held on the 14th day of Hare 1979 by the following TOLSTOY, A*IPEL AYES: COT9IISSIONERS: GARCIA, JONF.S, DARL, NOES: COID4ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CO:DIISSIONERS: t10NF. t h CITY /CODUTY POLICY FOR COORDINATION OF PLANNING ACTIVITIES CIt is the intent of this statement to provide reasanable policies and procedures which can provide the cities and county positive guidance in bringing about effective ;lanning cooperation A. There shall be several levels iof cooperation in coordination of all planning activities: I Timely notification of proposals of mutual concern by both cities and the county; 2 Ongoing coordination of developnent standards and implementation policies B There shall be several levels of cooperation in spheres of influence: I Continuous staff communication on all issues; • 2. Periodic formal Joint adoption and updating of plans; 3 Ongoing coordination of development standards and ample mentatlon policies. C Coordination and Joint planning mechanisms should include: 1 Joint city /county /resident study committees; 2 Joint planning commission and /or legislative body hearing or workshops; 3 City consultation and negotiation with unincorporated area residents; 4 Joint staff agreement for recommendations on issues; 5 City inclusion of unincorporated area residents on city planning commissions; 6 City planning commissioners sitting with the county planning commission regarding matters of mutual concern on a consulting basis; 7 Notification to the affected agency of planning and development proposals in advance of their hearing, and other means which may be available. 8. Notification and consultation with affected cities in other counties and other affected counties. D. General plans and zoning bbcll be jointly adjusted within spheres of influence to be made mutually compatible. This shall be ac- complislied through pursuit of a cooperative area planning program based upon a mutuallly agreeable schedule. Where two spheres abut, there shall be joint represenation and discussion between the in- volved jurisdictions to resolve conflicts of land use and develoment standards. E When a city's adopted general plan is found by the Board of Super- visors to be consistent with the adopted county general plan for the city's sphere of influence _ 1. The adopted city general plan will be used by the county as the principal land use guide; EXHIBIT "A" -) q5 2 sAll develpent phere ofoinfluencep must sbeiconsistent with the aheadopted city general plan; 3 pre-zoning the adopted county general ecific plans must be consistent with d F. Specific plans will be developed for each LAFC adopted sphere of influence. The development of these specific plans will be a cooperative effort between each affected jurisdiction The'Lcies, specific plans will generally utilize the adopted goals, p e and standards of the city When completed, these specificzPlans by should be adopted by the city and county the city should conform to the adopted specific plans. in an adopted general G. orespecificrplanifor LAFCe adopted isphere oofdinfluence, the proposal will be referred to the respective legislative and advisory bodies for action. • il. ideveloopeent for a city blend countyeshallnbe adJustedrto res�lt in sphere of anf rderlyDerimeteron of development standards along the. _ 1 Each Jurisdiction shall review, prior to approval, proposed agricul- tural preserve requests for consistency with city and county C general plane within and aJacent to spheres of influence Buffer areas of less intense agricultural or rural residential uses should be provided. These buffers mny occur on either side of the boundaries. L -3. 15a c 3 PROCEDURES FOR AMENDING PLANS 1. Whenever a city general plan is proposed to be amended or adopted the city will notify the county in a timely manner to permit timely coordination and appropriate response to this amendment or plan 2. Whenever the county Proposes to amend its general plan the county Will notify each aftected city in a timely manner to permit timely coordination and appropriate response to this amendment or plan. s E rl RRSOLOTION No' 79 -29 A gRSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNLZL OF M CITY Op RANCHO CUCA` oNC.1 ADWnlr- CITY/ COUNTY POLICY FOR C007DIHATION OF PIAN- Nisc AcunTIES WM -AEAS. the Rancho Cocs¢oaga ?laming Coce isslan has ;rent concern regarding projects within the City's planning arcs; sod' FIIERFAS. the Rancho Cucamonga planning Comissiaa has Planning Ac snip' tion of the proposed City /County Policy for Coordiaa[fan of P3auniug 6c[isitias; and ";FDAEAS. there Nave been problems is coordination of plaaaing activi- ties in the past; and Station l.IffREAS. it is the City's desire to create strong linen of cs®m between the City and the County; and NOW THEREFORE RE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho ;yncsscnga City Cauncil does hereby adopt the attached Exhibit °A ^• "mown as the City /County Policy for Coordination of Planning Activlilw' 3979 APPfl07 AND A00<'TID 1$IS �- DAY OF FD CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RA14CM CV--1-4015A ATTEST. C mayor 1 52 CITY /COUIITY POLICY FOR COOROIUATION OF PLAIIIIING ACTIYITES V It is the intent of this statement to provide reasonable policies and procedures which can provide the cities and county positive guidance in bringing about effective planning cooperation A There shall be several levels of cooperation in coordination of all planning activities: I. Timely notification of proposals of mutual concern by both cities and the county; 2 Ongoing coordination of development standards and implementation policies 8 There shall be several levels of cooperation in spheres of influence: 1 Continuous staff communication on all issues; 2. Periodic formal joint adoption and updating of plans; • 3. Ongoing coordination of development standards and imple mentation policies C Coordination and joint planning mechanisms should include: I. Joint city /county /resident study committees; 2 Joint planning commission and /or legislative body hearing V or workshops; 3 City consultation and negotiation with unincorporated area residents; 4 Joint staff agreement for recommendations on issues; 5. City inclusion of unincorporated area residents on city planning commissions; 6 City planning commissioners sitting with the county planning commission regarding matters of mutual concern on a consulting b.ssis; 7 Notification to the affected agency of planning and development proposals in advance of their hearing, and other means Idlich m• be available 8. Notification and consultation with affected cities to other counties and other affected counties D General plans and zoning shall be jointly adjusted within spheres of influence to be made mutually compatible. This shall be ac- Complished through pursuit of a cooperative area planning program based upon a mutuallly agreeable schedule Ilhere WD spheres abut, the, shall be joint represenation and discussion between the in- vol .'d jurisdictions to resolve conflicts of land use and develoment sta„dards. E. When a city's adopted general plan is found by the Board of Super- visors to be consistent with the adopted county general plan for the city's sphere of influence 1. Thn adopted city general plan will be used by the county as the principal land use guide, MIT81T •'A" 153 • U 2. All development proposals within the unincorporated city s.-here of influence must be consistent with the adopted city general plan; 3 City pre - zoning and :ounty specific plans must be consistent with the adopted city general plan F Specific plans will be developed for each LAFC adopted sphere of influence. The development of these specific plans will be a cooperative effort between each affected jurisdiction These specific plans will generally utilize the adopted goals, policies, and standards of the city. When completed, these specific plans should be adopted by the city and county Subsequent pre - zoning by the city should conform to the adopted specific plans G Whenever a revision or amendment is proposed in an adopted general or specific plan for LAFL adopted sphere of influence, the proposal will be referred to the respective legislative and advisory bodies for action. It In order to provide for a proper blend of development, the general development policies of a city and the county shall be adjusted to result in an orderly transition of development standards along the - sphere of influence perimeter 1 Each jurisdiction shall review, prior to approval, proposed agricul- tural preserve requests For consistency with city and county general plans within and ijacent to spheres of influence. Buffer areas of less intense agricultural or rural residential uses sho,ild be provided. These buffers may occur on either aide of the boundaries. 10 PROCEDURES FOR AMENDING PLANS U I. Whenever a city general plan is proposed to he amended or adopt:j the city rill) notify the county in a timely manner to permit timely coordination and appropriate response to this amendment or plan 2. Whenever the county proposes to amend its general plan the county will ratify each affected city in a timely manner to permit timely coordination and appropriate response to this amendment or plan. v v 0 LI 165 ,�a Y� MEMEO DATE: March 28, 1979 TO: City council SUBJECT: Redevelopment Information law totdetermine whetheru7ttis feasible too establish ahredevelopmentte The C1 agency for our a whether If the establishment of a redevelopment feasible, it is anticipated that tax increment funds may be agency is the develoDme ^t of the industrial areas of the city available feasible, aid e, REDEVELOP which each cormunity has the power to The California Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Sections 3300 is et. se .) Provides a means by The primary advantage of the IoW ^be used create a redevelopment agency eo ra h that funds which are not otherw se arelating to land cuse use, tax to remedy certain types of problems "freezing" the as valuation of property topography, economic factors, and related issues Simply increments are determined by ° before any improvements are made. differenceto the assessed ivalue before rate multiplied the and after improvements have been completed. • In order to form a redevelopment agency, the city need only adopt an tain findings that such public nterest and ordinance The ordinance establishing a redevelopment agency must and welfare Drocedur; are also conpromote safet will serve the P ..lace of a Redevelop - the public health, specified for the City Council to designate Itself to P procedures ment Agercy Board of Director'ti�sthat isarys�ordtheffollowtngipe creation of the redevelopment agency, to be followed: business. A Ad ePtion to govern conduct of agency processes are a necessary anf p, Ado lion of Surve Area - Council must adopt a survey area o° de term ne wiet er redevelopment p ex feasible �for solving the Pro 3 bleons analysisho�f existingic Witions, is survey P ocess including land use and economic factors In addition, necessary that thr, report identify alternatives for alleviating the deficiencies. N Redevelopment Information Page Two C. ty Council directs the Planning Commission to select a t area v.ithin the boundaries of the survey area. The ng Commission must also document the existence of blighted Ions in the area. This phase of the redevelopment is ntly controversial, particulary, if undeveloped land is ed in the project area The Preliminary Plan formulated Planninq Commission is usually qeneral in scope, describinq uad,ries of the project, land use, densities, and major Ives in accordance with the city's General Plan 0. Red.veo eel A ent Review of Preliminary Plans. TYe City :ounri ,act ng as the redevelopment agency, must review and accept the plans prepared by the Planning Commission This drocedure is accomplished by the adoption of a resolution. E Filing of Documents with Board of E ualization and all Tax1p A encies. Eat taxing age.,cy within t e propose pro ect area nest rev ew the plan and comment. Agencies have the option of filing a - protest to the plan or of working out some arrangement to receive tax increments which result from increases in assessed valuation. Most public agencies, particularly school districts, request their share of tax increments The city's redevelopment agency receives the remaining sum for redevelopment activities F Preparation of Draft Documents. 1 Redevelopment Plan - provides the detail of project objectives, land uses, zoning limitations, architectural guidelines, circulation plans, and related facts. 2 Environmental Impact Report • 3 owner Participation Plan - outlines various methods by which the property owners may be encouraged to participate in the Plan's implementation 4. Fiscal Plan - identifies fiscal impact upon taxing jurisdictions and debt limitations relative to tax increment financing. The County Assessor prepares this report. The costs must be reimbursed by the Agency 5 Report to City Council - outlines the Redevelopment Plan and related documents for the City Council to assure compliance with the State redevelopment laws i� •� 17 Redevelopment Information Page Three G. Review Process - documents as drafted are submitted for rev ew to the appropriate body or entity for review and comment. H. Public Hearin - all interested parties have an opportunity to comment on t e Plan 1 Plan Adoption - Pedevelopment Plan is adopted by ordinance t E It is significant to note that the redevelopment process requires • maximum community participation in project planning and implementation. A project area committee (PAC) must be formed within 60 days after p the Project Area has been selected if low and moderate income families re instances unless e required bysalfederallypassistediproject other recommendation of a PAC, the city Council must allocate necessary anddadequa tecsaffifor consultation and formulationsoflpollcy which affects the residents of the Project area. CONCLUSIONS Redevelopment is one of several tools available to the City which may provide a means for partiall,Y funding certain public improvements. The value of redevelopment has been greatly diminished, however, with the recent passage rf Proposition 13 The city's share of available tar increment revenues has been reduced substantially. In the view of the staff, the primary concern with redevelopment at this that camplet onwoflthe remaining mseven elementssofet the related work , which irequires arsubstantialocommitmentsofistaffetimeand Eve, if a ortion of will be necessary for redevelopment the vstaf fto assistsinofviirt allyyeveryuphasesofit work. The start -up costs for redevelopment are fairly substantial It is estimated that the costs for consultant. and /or additional staff, redevelopment legal counsel, and preparation of all materials required by law may be approximately 540,000 - S50,000 It appears that the tonnitment of these funds would have an impact on the city's total budget picture for the coming year. Although funds nay be "advanced" by the City to the redevelopment eyfor, upm for the work, ue accityeduring the the next of funds may crate a cash-flow roble year `r Redevelopment Information Page Four In summary, while the redevelopment law is available as a tool for funding certain public improvements, the following factors must be evaluated by the City Council: a) Start -up costs are substantial -- $40,000 - $50,000 b) more important atrthismparticularitire oRedeveloomentamayanot be the city's highest priority at this time. c) It is extremely difficult to document blighted corditions on raw land d) The 1, paarticularly ifrotherxtaxing agencies irequestrtheir - small, particularly respective shares e) is working on temporarily redevelopment, other important planning projects RECUMENDATIONS Because of the numerous problems now facing the city, it is recommended that the city not become Involved in establishing a redevelopment agency at this time. At sometime in the future, when many of our problems have been dealt with, redevelopment should again be considered by the City Council • Another option available to the City Council is to create the redevelopment agency by adopting the appropriate ordinance. Feasibility studies and the assembly of other information could be scheduled for a later date. \J RESOLUTION NO 79 -26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO AUTHORIZING E%AHINA= OF 'ION�OP SALES IhAND U E�TA%FRECORDS�• NHERFAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 9, the City of Rancho Cucamonga entered into a contract with the Stets Board of Equalization to perform all functions incident to the administration and collections of local salts and use taxes; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga deems it desirable Bad necessary from time to time for a representative of the :Sty to audit for an in its behalf the sales and use tax transactions and collections that are m,,e for the City by the State Board of Equalization; and tOlEREAS, Section 7056 of the Revenur atd Taxation Coda of the State of California state in part that the Boardexaminepermit athe anlet to authorized officer or employee and use tax records of the City; NOV , THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,10NCA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOUONS: SECTION 1: That the City Manager, Finance Director, or designated assistant or employee of the City Manager, is hereby appointed to represent the City of Ranchu Cucamonga vith full authority to investigate collections contained am the records of theaStateiBoardaofEqualizatloa r the City, SECTION 2: That as provided in Section 7056 of the Revenues and Taxation Code, the information so gained by the City Manager, Director, or any designatrd assistant or emp loyee collection of local Bales of the City Manager shall b [used only fcBnardposesu t related the Contract- ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of, 1979 _ES: NOES: ASSENT: City Clerk l &l Mayor C Hi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA NINORANDIM Data; March 26, 1979 To: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager From: Jack Lm, Director of Co®unitY Development Subject: MEDIATR CLERICAL NEEDS - gUILDINO DIVISION Please find attached a mmo outliaing the urgent needs for additional clerical assiseones in the Euildfng and Safery Division. The needs as outlined I feel justify the immediate hiring of a part -time clark typist to relieve the intenoe pressure upon the Division and allow it to function more effectively. The amount of money necessary to fund vi�lh probably mac a :scaedn5E00�vgThiseamountnmay be covered through r ainder of this f local salary savings which resulted from the -esiguatiom that the Department )-as had. Please advise us ua to the disposition of this request. Respectfully bmitted, • JACK LAM, Direc o Community Development JL:nn i M E M O R A N D U M TO: Community Development Director FROM: Building Official Attached is a partial list of items currently in need of accomplishment or being dealt with on an inefficient level in the Building and Safety Division Many of these projects or tasks fall into catogorios that are urgent or need constant attendance. In an effort to keep many "pots" from "boiling over" work subjects are ignored, do not recieve adequate attention, are pushed aside to attend to more immediately urgent matters or are being handled by individual staff members who should be concerned with less mundane matters I am firmly convinced that our Division clerical staff is working at an intensity that would be highly productive if order could init4ally be achieved in our systems . Field inspections are presently in reasonably good order, although no time is being devoted to the maintenace of old permits nor to assistance In permit issuance and office operations as I believe necessary If communicative awareness 15 to exist. The Senior Inspector is currently performing residential plan checking on new d.rcllings and major additions. They should be done by others rather than dis- tracting him from supervision of field inspection staff Rechecking of co=cr- cial and Industrial plans is almost completely done by myself after working hours at home Both of these plan check operations should be done during work - Ing hours by appropriate persons rather than as is, in order to be cost effective and efficient We could utilize consulting services for all checking and rechecking but the: would not only be inefficient, cost -wrso, it also would delay plan checking at least a week You will note by the attached list thatmany areas of pendency or regression lie within the realm of office procedures and operations Although Jackie and Beverly have been working overtime for several Saturdays, we still are not making adequate headway, If the systems fees and /or drainage fees are ulti- mately adopted, further logging will result Many of rho items arc quite menial and not demanding of a high level of skill An individual with reasonable filing and minimal typing skills would serve to redistribute the work projects and promote more efficient use of current abilities within the Division My proposal is, rather than wait until approval of the 1979 -80 budget, that we be authorized to immediately obtain the services of a part -time clerk - typist, a college student or oven a high school student to help close the gaps created during our organizational stages In so doing, we may be able to avoid being helplessly buried by our own incapabillties I hope that some assistance will be forthcoming soon! i will ippreciate any help we can get AJ, anOf c JRr,:jmt ) b 3 �r l; Ll 0 Items tending to promote confusion conflicts or omissions because of lack of clear definition of responsibility, duplication of efforts, dis- traction by "urgent" requests or general lack of adequate time for train- ing or communication: 1 Standardization of permit fee charges 2. Assignment of street numbers S. Inadequate plan storage facilities 4. Permit issuance extending beyond permit issuance hours S Request for monthly permit issuance /valuation information 6 Requests for utility nlearance information 7 Prolonged transfer of old County permits g Inadequate telephone system 9 Response on county inspected projects needing correction (3) Building and Safety Division Work Items Needing Attention or Reassignment 1. Indexing and filing of plans 2. Conversion and filing of completed permits received from County: typing of permanent file envelopes 3. Logging and compilation of permit issuance and fees received for reporting purposes 4. Preparation of statistical and financial reports from City Council and media information 5 Completion of permit forms, administration of "contracts" for production of same a) plan check receipts b) 0Iec /plmbg/mech permit forms c) building permit form d) grading permit form a) certificate of occupancy form 6. Preparation of processing forms a) plan checking correction sheet b) monthly report • c) complaint form d) occupancy inppectioq form- - e) revision plan check log form 7. Formulation and documentation of office procedures and policies a) plan check routing b) complaint reception and disposal c) log entry, monthly report d) job descriptions c) permit issuance B Pending abatement actions a) Haven Bldg Materials h) Santa Fe RR Station c) Reid St Residence 9 Updating Workman's Compensation Certif files 10 Initiation program of reinspection on "old" permits to determine progress /inspection • 11. Standardization clearance /checking procedures with Fire Distrsct, Health Dept , CCWD 12 Initiate in- service inspector training program 13 Preparation /revision of public relations handouts a) Residential plan check /handout sheet b) Swimming pool information c) Plan submittal information d) Patio 14 Preparation of construction new oridnances for adoption: a) 1979 Bldg, Plcbg /Meth , Sign, Hazardous Building Abatement, (lousing codes b) 15 Uaily filing of active and completed permits for ready availability 16. Typing of current work items 17 Interfiling of new ICBO, IAPli0 approval recommendations f2) t 6� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA KIN 'I) - April A. 1979 TOz City Council E City tanager Lloyd Nubbs, City Engineer F ==CT- PPOPOSAL REVIEW - BASELINE PRIUECT The Engineering Division recently completed the solicitation of proposals for reconstruction of Baseline Street, east of Vineyard to Hellman Avenue and east of Archibald Avenue to Ramona Avenue. Listed below are the not to exceed prices for the (design and construction staking phases of this project. Associated Engineers were low at $16,200 for design. All the proposals indicated that exact staking costs were not known at this Lice, however, estimated the costs - that would be involved. Construction staring wAl be billed at hourly rates for the work performed. FEES FIRM PREanitay DESIGN DESIGN CONSTRUCTION STAKING TOT L ESTIMATE Associated Engineers $16,200 $4,000 $20,200 j� C S Engineering $11,930 61100 2,720 20,750 L. D. Xing 12,000 6,200 1,440 19,640 'r TnDMpMATIUH: Based on the low costs for design it is recommended that the City Council approve the preparation of agreements for design services with ; Associated Engineers. 40 Respectfully sybmitted. City Engineer Mdeb CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA MFMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO: City Council b City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: 4 NAY STOP AT HELM AVENUE AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD The City's Traffic Committee at it's March 13, 1979 meeting, recommended that a 4 way stop be installed at the Intersection of Hellman Avenue and San Bernar- dino Road The Committee's report has been submitted to the City Council. On the hasls of that report, your concurrence and approval of the attached Resolution is requested. - Respectfully submitted, LLOYD 6UBBS City Engineer LH:PAR.deb attachment 167 0 0 Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Committee Item 2 ilarch 13, 1979 Hellman Avenue at San Bernardino Road Request: 4 Ilay Stop Co1PLAINT. Accident frequency and driver visibility at the intersection. DATA: This intersection is about 6DO feet north of Foothill Boulevard. It is controlled by stop signs on San Bernardino Road for east and westbound traffic. Visibility from stopped vehicles is restricted by private property structures and plantings in the northwest and southeast corners. Turning from westbound to northbound is restricted by the narrow width of Hellman Avenue There have been 9 accidents in the last 18 months which could be prevented by a 4 way stop Daily traffic volumes on Hellman Avenue are about 4,000 and on San Bernardino Road about 2,100. The average of the 8 highest hourly volumes for the intersection is 457 vehicles, and the corresponding minor street (San _ Bernardino Road) volume is 153. The speeds of southbound cars are from 40 to 50 HPH generally. COIUIITTEE ACTION: The Committee agreed that the accident pattern here was un- likely to be Improved by any measure other than 4 way stop. The visibility restrictions will not be corrected by development in the near future and traffic volumes are within the range required by accepted warrants for approach speeds over 40 11PH. It 1s recommended that stop signs be installed on Hellman Avenue at San Bernar- dino road. 16T RESOLUTION NO. 79 -27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELATIVE TO THE INaTALLATION OF STOP SIGNS ON HELLMAN AVENUE AT SAN BERNARDINO ROAD. WHEREAS, the Traffic Committee of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has recommended the installation of a four way stop at the intersection of Hellman Avenue and San Bernardino Road, and WHEREAS, Section 8 of Ordinance Number 39 provides that the City Council must by resolution designate intersections at which vehicles are required to stop, and WHEREAS, the safety of the motoring public will be enhanced by the stopping of all vehicles at the subject intersection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that vehicles be required to stop on Hellman Avenue at San Bernardino Road and that the City Engineer accomplish the installation of the necessary atop slgm, together with appropriate pavement markings and warning devices ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED THIS day of , 1979. City Clark 16? Mayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 TO, City Council 6 City Hanager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer suaTECT: TRACT 9494 - ACCEPTANCE OF BONUS AHD AGREEMENT The Marchu2Oec1979. The submitted for Chevron then ismof approval bytheCounty and the Cucamonga County Water District have been The bonds for development and acceptance are as follows: Faithful Performance (Road) $ 64,000.00 Laborer 6 liaterialmen (Road) $ 32,000.00 The subject tract consists of 32 lots and 7.6 acres located east of Haven Avenue at Victoria Street. RECQ44ERBATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached bandsagreement - Frectingthe City Engineer to Cityn the map and the Mayor to accept Respectfully submitted, 41 LLOYD HUBBS City Engineer LH:deb attachment 170 FO rK NAIL -/17B / ,,FQ rgv;N e'= f� esA .v[ ce" T.ts coFo 4'Wa -A OW oa fp4CFFB SK. A; S NWGx 66C ldO 5S! /iJ f PS T7 /•CS 553//6 IV 8'?E5 ?SQ75' 97 ._.. ' Jl -.. i Jtidf. r r• .- ki all •- �d3.5!'CQ•JV. eosctJ"O1 3 ' i w �bt pp11 9 ' PTdLGCQ '�.. 7,'24er 4S196 uveR .. A/a / l� y 3\4�Q.R f/S✓d�R4 /LB °, Ig �. d•e� �• . �/ 7� 94# nccfd. �o9� \may S `Q,Q. 21I ``ST / GiC yO o`N �1 • •F� ' ' 9az 8 I5 /G , •0 h 2d z • -•N� ° _ v b .S•F.n • - Mz B I rtR5: j. � eC710142- V i oR , g /a Vx3ae� ';Jr t� ' J I • 3 ire �s a�iei tr . NdIL /1'A' L • � • ` � I1aNw/1.v1 K .i/vd '•CQF� 636/0/ iJ�'I• jn �.�- 2 ✓0..-$.CC 7GGes• �e e. reAc&.q ' fVa ate LMe '' "•• •• N. 89'49'/C•E 529/.99' r •, `iO.. G.9Al AeJ55Q15C FLE 2�f. ?M PGp= ! �' itR C6FB ?79/79 R S P7Ae B2 Yj, r SWCQP SEe. 9G 9E CCiQ 8EC vA 11/ 1 SURVEY AD Nor 70 6 c <ce ♦O V RESOLUTION N0. 79 -28 A RESOLUTION OF THC CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO IMPRO CUCAMONGA, SEICURIIY,�AND FINAL MAP OF IMPROVEMENT NORZ99434 , WHEREAS, the Tentative Nap of Tract No. 9434, consisting of 32 lots, submitted by Chevron Construction Subdivider, located cast of Haven at Via toria Street has beeovedbice�idtClly as City provid d Rancho the Subdivision by said Subdivider and app Y Nap Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; Ad WHEREAS, to meet. the requirements established as prerequisite • to approval Of the Final Ma of Tract said for8approvalra d ®execution the improvement by said City, together with good and sufficient improvement security, and submits for approval said Final Nap offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City fo Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows; is 1 adttheiNayorrisau[horized tocexecute "mesonabehalfpofvsaid City, the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and, 2 e bjecti to Approval nasS touform accepted an good thereof by thesufficient. City Attorney; ad. 3 That me for e the City Clark[ is au delneating to i execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of 1979. ATTEST. City Clerk 17 A Mayor t_ A.H. REITER DEVELOPMENT April 4, 1979 City Council City pf Rancho Cucamonga P. 0 Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Sirs: Being a developer of properties within the City, I am extremely upset at the rescinding of the Drainago AsGess- ment Pee. As of today, due to rain, Hellman and Carnelian Avenues are nearly impassable; Archibald's six lanes hecome two lanes. Within one to two years, Archibald may be impassable. I realize that there has been a tremendous uproar by certain developers concerning this fee. However, if you, as City Councilmen, representatives of the community, belabor any longer and do not immediately approve the ordinance, I can foresee the future fee being $5,000 or more. My newest project at Arrow and Archibald will, when fully developed, create approximately 28 cfs of water in a five year storm. This relates to an increase of approximately one Inch in height of water on the west side of Archibald, south of my project and as I observed the water level in this last storm, was two inches from the top of the curb. I see only two remedies for these conditions; one, an immediate stop to all development, wtdch will effect an increase of water on public streets and which we can not afford to dot or secondly, an immediate passage of the drainage fee Briefly, I will add that this cost ($2,5[0 per acre feet is very insignficant as to the total projects costs. my calculations show that the fee portion is 0 66 of ny initial project costs or approximately $0 12 to $0 13 P.O. Boa 7:50. Re -pwt Baca, CA 9:663 318! Puliman • Cwta Veu Udwma VQ6 71a 1,51-4544 - 'r Page 2 City Council extra per square foot of building area This represents the most inexpensive form of insurance against flooding and for the continued appreciation of our property values I do not believe as individuals who's interest in the betterment of a community, have any other choice then to approve this ordinance immediately. I will make only one other suggestion that this fee also _ be placed on projects now under construction prior to final- izing; which will include all of my pro•jects under construction. Sincerely, A H. REITER DEVELOPMENT COMP.INY Henry Reiter / -`j M Presentation to Rancho Cucamonga City Council, April i, 1979. Maryellen Hill, Vice- Praeident Associated Chaffey Teachers. Leachor a Alt Loma High School, and resident of Alta Loma. The Associated Chaffey Teachers Board of Directors on March 6, 1979. and the Associated Chaffcy Teachers Representative Council on March 13, 1979, by a majority vote passed the following motion: "Bill Pitts moved and Maryellen Hill seconded that the Board of Directors recommend to Rep Council that ACT take a position of being opposed to any partial 1L'ting of the moratorium on construction In Rancho Cucamonga. Further, that if the Rancho Cucamonga City Council approves the lifting of any part or at' I of the moratorium that ACT support the position that the issue be submitted to the voters an a referendum. Motion carried.'' Associated Chaffay Teachers proposeu that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council continue the present building moratorium and not implement a growth management plan until the moratorium issue can be voted on by all the mcmbeii of our community. We believe that a referendum is vital on this issue. It is vndoubtedly the most important Issue our young city has to make, and the decislon will greatly affect our quality of life for years to come. The decision reached on this issue would have a significant impact on three local government agencies: fire, water, and schools. However, oach of these elected boards in powerless on this issue since the Rancho Cucamonga City Council plans to make a unilateral decision on Hits most important community concern, There Is very recen• precedent for having such an important issue decided by a veto of the people. Thit past spring the Rancho Cucamonga City Councii itself placed the completion of the Foothill Freeway on the ballot for a community veto. The moratorium question is at least as Important to this community as freeway construction. In conclusion, Associated Chaffey Teachers urge the Rancho Cucamonga City Council to allow the democratic process to determine the outcome of the moratorium Inoue. The proposal should be passed on so the voters no that local residents can be given the opportunity to decide the issue with their votes. Associated Chaffey Teachers urge residents to voice their concerns and views to local sifters and councilmen, r t. AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Regular Meeting April 4, 1979 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE TO FLAG 3. ROLL CALL: Mikels_, Palombo_, Schlosser_, West_, Frost_ 4 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: (clot Included) S. ANNOUNCEMENTS. —Aca i7 as Rdr ves, u saylces_ % /S.VW PBtt��'t r /If'3aM�a. 6 COMMITTEE REPORTS '0A*M411O • G/vat[ri ff. -.Vg" io - C"sf✓r a. Advisory Committee (A report with Ordinance No. 71 will be heard under Public Hearings ) b. Historical Commission 7. CONSENT CALENOARt The following Consent Calendar Stems are erpoeted to be routine and non-ccntroverslal They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion Any Council mambar, staff member, or Interested party may request that an Item be removed from the Consent Calendar for later discussion. a Approval of Warrants in the amount of $117,439 77. .. 1 b. Approve Alcoholic Beverage License for on -sale general -- 30ars Head, 6620 Carnelian, Rancho Cucamonga, 91701 . ..... . 10 C Request Attendance at American Planning Association meeting Authorization is requested for the Cormunity Development Director to attend the American Planning Association, California Chapter meetinq in San Diego in April 1979 Although funds were not specifically budgeted for attendance at this conference, it is our recommendation that approval be qranted. The APA meetings are of considerable value to the planning staff and they help to keep 0e planning profession updated on current concepts in municipal ,fanning RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Community Development Director be authorized to attend the American Planning Association California Chapter meetinq in San Deign Anticipzted cost of the conference is 5200. f , Agenda -2- April 4, 1979 d Acceptance of Gift From Theta Cable, Inc .............. ........12 The present cable television franchise for San Bernardino County requires payment of a franchise fee in the amount of 2% of gross receipts. Since Theta Cable pays our neighboring communities a fee of 5: of grass receipts, the organization has offered to pay a similar amount to the City of Rancho Cucamonga In accordance with the provisions of the Goverment Code, it is recommended that the City Council accept the additional 3% offerei by Theta Cable as a gift to the City. e Zonin Am Ordinance endment no. 79 -03 - City of Rancho Cucamonga - or pun c hear ng before the C ty Council on April 18, 1979 - Zone Chan a Ho�. 79 -02 - City of Rancho Cucamonga For public 13 ear nh i g Eefore the Tty Council on April 18, 1979.. .. ... . q Tract 9131: Release of Cash Bonds to Sagewood Homes, Inc Cash Bond - Lot 8 52,000 00 Cash Bond - Lot 7 S 150.00 h. Tract 9226: Release of bond for Restoration of the model area to John D. Lusk and Son Bond 51,000.00 i. Tract 9274 Release of Cash Staking Deposit to N.J. Brock b Sons, Inc. Cash Staking Deposit $4,450.00 j Tract 9274 Accept roads and release bond to M.J. Brock d Sons, Inc. Performance Bond (Road) $172,000 k Tract 9280 Release of bond to Bob Jensen Builder, Inc. Performance Bond (Landscaping)$ 5,000 1 1 Tract 9295 Accept roads and release bond to Socaland Corporation. e-. Performance Bond (Road) 5100,000 r% } M. Tract 9302: Release of Bonds to Vanguard Builders, Inc. 1'+ Performance Bond (Sewer) S 34,000 Performance Band (Hater) S 20,000 n. Tract 9305: Release of bonds to the Jones Company p, , Performance Bond (Sewer) $ 43,000 Performance Bond (Hater) S 50,000 9•_ '• City Council Agenda -3- April 4, 1979 r o. Tract 9313: Accept roaf and release bonds to Socaland ' Corporation Performance Bond (Road) $ 78,000 ' p. Tract 9314: Accept roads and release bond to John 0. Lusk A Son Performance Bond (Road) $168,000 q. Tract 9321 Release of Cash staking deposit to Crowell/ Leventhal, Inc. Cash staking deposit $ 3,700 r. Tract 9321: Release of bond to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. Performance Bond (Landscaping)S 18,975 s. Tract 9322: P.rlease of cash staking deposit to Lewis Homes of California. Cash staking deposit S 3,650 t. Tract 9353: Release of bond to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc - Performance Bond (Landscaping)$ 8,728.50 U. Tract 9358: Release of cash staking deposit to Crowell/ Leventhal], Inc. Cash staking deposit S 1,900 V. Tract 9358 Release of bond to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond (Road) $ 80.000 W. Tract 9381: Accept roads and release bond to Lesny/Milshire Properties. 914 Performance Bond (Road) 5136,000 X. Tract-93M Accept roads and release bond to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. Performance Bond (Road) $ 82,000 y. Tract 9447: Release of bonds to Walton Construction Corporation. Labor 5 Material Sewer S 6,500 Labor E Material Water $ 9,500 z. Tract 9450: Release of bond to Crowed /Leventhal. Inc. Performance Bond (Landscaping)$ 5,225 aa, Tract 9424 Accept roads and release bond to David W Long. i Performance Bond (load) S 42,000 1 a bb. Tract 9559: Accept roads and release bond to Don Lee • Construction. Performance Bond (Road) $134,000 cc. Tract 9616: Release of rash staking deposit to M.J. " Brock b son;. A- K., Cash staking deposit $ 3,050 City Council Agenda -4- April 4, 1979 •, dd Refer Insurance Claim by R.J Siever b Company for Lydia Mosqueda to the City attorney for handling ....... ......... 66 8. PUBLId HEARINGS _ "R _ i A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 79 -01 - Sign Ordinance. .. 68 An amendment to the zoning ordinance to add a new sign GK ordinance and repeal all existing sign provisions. ORDINANCE NO. G5 "(second )reading}_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOTPING A COMPRE- HENSIVE SIGN ORDINANCE AND REPEALING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE PERTAINING TO SIGN REGULATION. B The City CounetI of Rancho Cucamon a last Se tember a ointed a body o persons to aet as the C ty s H stor ca Coam ssion. he r tas was to recommen necessar measures to the ounc to identIU, designate reserve an rotect .he h stogy ric resources in our C ty. ���• ORDINANCE NO. 70 '(Second Reading) ...... ... ... 90 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CREATING All HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMKISSION TI) ACT IN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO CITY COUNCIL IN THE IDENTIFICATION A110 PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS, EVENTS, STRUCTURES AND SITES AND TO IDENTIFY PERSONS OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C Ordinance for the Establishment of Storm Drain and System% - Oeve ooment Fee ... ............. : .......................... r.., ....:. 100 The Community Development Department is proposing for adoption • the establishment of a storm Drain fee of 42,500 per acre to be applied to land divisions and the issuance of buildin permits and a Systems Development fee of one percent (1%3 on the building valuation to be assessed at the time of development These fees will be used for the exclusive purpose of Planning, Engineering, and constructing stredt and storm drain facilities 4 s 'i- ✓' City Council Agenda -5- April 4, 1979 ORDINANCE 110.'61 „c(Secnod- Readinal.......... .. .. ... 100 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE ON NEW ^FVELOPMENT. RESOLD IOR'N0.;79 -10.: :.. -:. -.. ...... ........ . 102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, SETTING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO. 61 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. D. Amendment to,the %City's +201'Scbool -Fee Ordinance. .. . . 103 At the previous City Council meeting the Council directed f staff to prepare an amendment to tW 201 Ordinance to a+� include language from SB201 that would allow the dedication _ of land in lieu of payment of fees OPDINANCE NO. 74 '(First•2eadinq) ......... ... 104 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 30, WHICH PERTAINS TO THE FINANCING OF INTERIM SCVOOL FACILITIES, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE DEDICATION OF LAND IN LIEU OF FEES. E. Amendment to-Current-Moratorium Ordinance -... .. 105 An amendment to the current moratorium ordinance which would allow the City to process a parcel map where only one buildable parcel can result, thereby allowing opportunities - ` for single home builders to proceed. The amendment 1iac4mdes includes the paragraph that the City Council concurred with at the previous City Council meeting. ORDINANCE NO. 73 (Urgency) .. ..... 106 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 64 TO EXEMPT PARCEL MAPS WHERE ONLY ONE (1) NEW DWELLING UNIT CAN RESULT FROM THE MORATORIUM ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 64, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF City Council A;enda -6- April 4, 1979 Amendment to the Zonin Ordinance Regarding Regulations ....... 107 o Herat= [cupat ons. At the last City Council meeting, certain structural problems � were found in the draft of the Ordinance establishing new ,JACK home occupation regulations This Ordinance has been reviewed by the City Attorney and the structural errors corrected. ORDINANCE NO. 72 (First Reading) . I ... .......... 108 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTION 61.024A (b) (3), AMENDING SECTION 61 022, AND ADDING SECTION 61 0219 (a) (9) OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE REGULATION OF HOME OCCUPATIONS G. Re ort From Citizens Advisor Committee regarding Parking. of ecreat ono Ve2h c es on C ty Streets. W The Citizens Advisory Committee representing the communities of Etiwanda, Alta Lama, and Cucamonga have reviewed a problem concerning the parking of recreational vehicles on city streets After considerable discussion, the Advisory Committee has recommended an ordinance which would prohibit the parking or storage of any house car, .railer, camp trailer, trailer coach, camper, or boat on any public street or alley within the city for any longer than one hour between the hours of 2:00 a m. and 6:00 a m. Any violation of the proposed ordinance would result in a $25.00 fine. The $25 fine is consistent with other city ordinances concerning the parking of vehicles. It is significant to note that the Committee recognizes that the ordinance is somewhat restrictive. However, we feel • that it is important that all recreational vehicles not be permitted to park on city streets Such parking of recreational vehicles is frequently considered to be unsightly and represents a potential safety hazard for vehicles attempting to back out f driveways RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the proposed ordinance establishing parking restrictions for recreationdl vehicles be approved by the City Council. ORDINANCE NO. 71' (First'Reading) .... ... 113 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PARKING RESTRICTIONS FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. City Council Agenda -7- April 4, 1979 H-' Storm'Drain' Wbrdinance — The revised Ordinance adopting Drainage Plans and Drainage Fees. ORDINANCE NO 75 (First Reading) .. . ..... . . 120 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A DRAINAGE PLAN AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF DRAINAGE FEES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. 9 CITY MANAGEZ'S STAFF REPORTS A. Declaration,of_Imoaction. Chaffer Joint Union Higti School District. The Board of Trustess representing the Chaffey Joint Union High School District has submitted a revised declaration of impaction In order to comply with the provisions of City Ordinance No. 30 The declaration of impaction contains the following findings as determined by the Board of Trustees 1 Overcrowding exists due to the occupation of new y luCjj4ovj9&W1dVhomes creating an enrollment in excess of the design capacity of the school. WAt+�: Alta Low High School was designed to accommodate 1600 hft student A.G.N> %tewf s Peak enrollment for 1978 -79 exceeded 2600 3. In attempting to alleviate this problem the District o. pis,( 4SED &- Zo&(Mmenstalled 20 relocatable classrooms on the same site CA,ASi',fV0"j; Even with these increased facilities, maximum capacity is only 2100 students. The 20 relocatables should not be counted to the design capacities because there are inadequate support facilities, causing curricular restrictions �Sowirojay 4. The District is currently operating a 10- period day schedule at Alta Loma High School in order to survive these unfortunate conditions. i 9 H� O 5 For the school year 1979 -80 all ninth graders from r the Alta Loma attendance area will attend other O_^..�/fwA�y district schools There still will he over 2080 tenth - twelfth grade students on campus The condition of impaction, as defined by 58 -201 and Ordinance No 30, still exists 6 Recent action by the City Council to lift restrictions on home bud further will further impact Alta Loma High School The school could be forced into an extended day session for 1980 -81, with only grades 10 -12 on campus. City Council Agenda -B- April 4, 1979 The Chaffey Joint Union High School District has reviewed - all practical and-reasonable methods for mitigating over- crowded conditions Including the following Use of_relocatable structures and trailers to the extent feasible with District finances and site space and in considering the load on support facilities Major-realignment of all school boundaries was considered, discussed, and partially implemented. Use of -all local bond and state loan revenues to the extent allowed by law All reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding have been evaluated, some implemented, and no further feasible nethod for reducing such conditions exists There are currently no classrooms used for non - instructional purposes. There are currently no agreements between the Chaffey Joint Union High School District and any residential developer whereby temporary -use buildings will be leased to the school district. /REC"ENDATION: If the City Council concurs with the declaration _Y/ of impaction as filed, the Council must indicate its concurrence by adopting an appropriate resolution. The next issue which /� must be considered is astaLlishing a fee for residential �i 0iP( /r�souflrowpevelopment with the Chaffey Joint Union High School Districc. /� It is our understanding this issue is currently being discussed between committee members representing the City Council and Qp0 PT FEi the Chaffey Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees Until that fee has been decided, it 1s appropriate for the I' Board of Trustees to submit a schedule specifying how the fees Skol fT Sd will be used to solve problems of overcrowding. The schedule mute as a minimum: The classroom facilities to be obtained. b. Location of classrooms The times such classrooms will be available. RESOLUTION NO 79- 32..... ...... . . 132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING IN THE FINDINGS OF THE CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT CONDITIONS OF OVERCROWDING EXIST IN SAID DISTRICT Report From Finance Director Regarding Cost for Census....... . 137 A oa" x n j City Council Agenda -9- April 4, 1979 C. Setting Fees For Subscriptions:. .. ...... .139 RESOLUTION NO 79 -31 ... .... ... .. ..140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO �f CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, SETTING CEPTAIN FEES FOR THE ANNUAL L SUBSCRIPTION OF CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDAS AND /OR MINUTES D. Establishment- of- General Plan Amendment Date. .. 141 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -30. ... . .... 145 Auk A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ESTABLISHING ANNUAL GENERAL PLAIT AME14DKENT HEARING DATES E City /County Policy'for Coordination of Planning-Activities. .147 -NO. 79- 29 ................ ... .. .. 152 CRESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CITY /COUNTY POLICY FOR COORDINATION OF PLANNING ACTIVITIES f F , Redevelopment-Information :.... ... ... ....... .•156 f^ G Re vest Authorization for Finance Director to Audit State-Board of qua zat on a es Tax Records. Authorization is requested for the City Manager, Finance Director, or any employee designated by the City Manager to request a review of sales and use tax transactions and collections J for the City of Rancho Cucamonga This information is essential L , in order to make certain that the city is receiving all sales and use tax revenues to which it is entitled. It is significant to note that the information retained by the State Board of Equalization is confidential Therefore, a City Council resolution designating the city representatives authorized to review the records is required. It is anticipated that the information we receive from the audit of State Board of Equalization will be used to help predict the anticipated revenues from sales and use taxes in the current and coming fiscal years. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No._ 79 -26 ' City Council Agenda -10- April 4, 1979 RESOLUTION NO.79- 26 ......... .... .. ... 161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF SALES AND USE TAX RECORDS. H. Requewfor Temporary Clerical'- Assistance .. ............. ... 2 The Building Official and the Community Development Director have requested authorization to employee a part -time clerk in order to alleviate some of the back -log of work to the 40A Building Department. It is anticipated that the cost for a half -time position for the re*.naindpr of the fiscal year will be approximately $800. Funds are available to a salary account because of resignations within the Community Development Department. _ RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Personnel Department be authorized to recruit for and hire a clerk typist at an hourly salary of $3.81 Funds are available from accumulated salary savings in the Community Development Department LU��1 Pro osal R ?view - Baseline Project.. 166 v L ov ubbs L�Four Hay Stop at Hellman Avenue and San Bernardino Road....... 167 RESOLUTION NO 79 -27 .. .... ... .. ... 169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TPE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELATIVE TO THE INSTALLATION OF STOP SIGNS ON HELLMAN AVENUE AT SAN BERNARDINO ROAD Tract 9434: Acne Lance of Bonds and Agreement b Chevron .... 170 Construct on. Faithful Performance (Road) S 64,000 00 Laborer 6 Materialmen (Road) $ 32,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, ACID FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO 9434 i� 1 City Council Agenda -11- April 4, 1979 'r r 10 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 11. NEW BUSINESS a Council b Audience 12 ADJOURNMENT x s `S t i.9� fvusa4-CAL97`+ala- 5twhi brr V11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM "41-hc N DATE: April 2, 1979 TO: City Council 5 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUB.TECT: APPROVAL TO ENTER AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR SIGNALS AT BASELINE STREET AND HELLMAN AVENUE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET Attached for Council review are proposals for the provision of design plans and specifications for the above referenced FAU signal projects. Proposals were solicited from six firms with five responding Each of the funs are qualified to perform the work in a timely manner. Listed below are the not to exceed budgets from each of the firms: x Accn +ter �= 53,400 2 (Wes H01 on r ngle d Associates $3,900 3 5trrymr,n b Stephenson, Irc. $4,200 4. Associated Engineers $5,600 5. C G engineering $6,000 Based on these estimates, the Engineering Division reconnends that the Council approve nreparation of a contract agreement with Mohle, Perry b Associates to perform design services for thase projects This item will be added to the ADril 4, 1979 Council agenda Item I for approval. Respectfully su ltted, y LLO Lit Engineer LH:deb r`r Presentation to Rancho Cucamonga City Council, April d, 1979. Maryellen Hill, Vice - president Associated Chaffey Teachers,, Asaeher as Loma High School, and resident of Alta Loma. t The Associated Chaffey Teachers Board of Directors an March 6, 1" ?9, and the Associated Chaffey Teachers Representative Council on March 13, 19790 by a majority vnto passed the following motion; "Bill Pitts moved and Maryellen Hill seconded that the Board of Directors recommend to Rep Council that ACT take a position of being opposed to any partial lifting of the moratorium on construction in Rancho Cucamonga. Further, that if the Rancho Cucamonga City Council approves the lifting of any part or all of the moratorium that ACT support the position that the Issue be submitted to the voters as a referendum. Motion carried." Associated Chaffey Teachers proposes that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council continue the present building moratorium and not implement a growth management plan until the moratorium issue can be voted on by all the members of our community. We believe that a referendum is vital on this Inoue. It is undoubtedly the must import .-m Issue our young city has to make, and the da,:ision will greatly affect nur quality of life for years to come. The decision reached on this issue would Iwvn a significant impact on three local government agencies: fire, water, and schools. However, each of those eiected boards in powerless on this Inoue since the Rancho Cucamonga City Council plans to make a unilatorai decision on thin most important community concern. There In very recent precedent for having such an important !osue decided by a vote of the people. This past spring the Rancho Cucamonga City Council Itself placed the completion of the Foothill Freeway on the ballot for a community vote. The moratorium question is at least as important to this community as freeway construction. In conclusion, Associated Chaffey Teachers urge the Rancho Cucamonga City Council to allow ilia democratic process to determine the outcome of the moratorium Issue. The proposal should be passed on so the voters so that local residents can be given the opportunity to decide the issue with their votes. Associated Chaffey Teachers urge residents to voice their concerns and views to local editors and councilmen. �Ll� s , A.H. REITER DEVELOPMENT April 4, 1979 City Council City pf Rancho Cucamonga P 0 Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Sirs: Being a developer of properties within the City, I am extremely upset at the rescinding of the Drainage Assess- ment Fee. As of today, due to rain, Hellman and Carnelian Av6nues are nearly impassable; Archibald's six lanes become two lanes. Within one to two years, Archibald may be impassable. I realiza that there has been a tremendous uproar by certain developers concerning this fee. P.owevere if you, as City Councilmen, representatives of the community, belabor any longer and do not immediately approve the ordinance, I can foresee the future fee being $5,000 or more My newest project at arrow and Archibald will, when fully developed, create approximately 28 cfs of water in a five year storm This rela•es to an increase of approximately one inch in height of .rater on the west side of Archibald, south of my project a*id as I observed the water level in this last storm, war two inches from the top of the curb I see only two remedies for these conditions one, an immediate stop to all development, which will effect an inerea3e of water on public streets and which we can not afford to do; or secondly, an immediate passage of the drainage fee Briefly, I will add that this cost ($2,500 per acre fee) is very inn :nficant as to the total projects costs. .. my calculations show that the fee portion is 0 63 of ny initial project costs or approximately $0.12 to $0.13 P.0 go. :250. Nn. -Pun Stich, 049.663 312 Pullman Costa %1 • a CAMom a 92626 "14 • :51459: Page 2 city council extra per square foot of building area' 1 in LDs represents the cost inexpensive fora of insurance agaserty values. t flooding and for the continued appreciation of our Prop individuals wbo's interest in the Z do not believe as �nnitY, have any other choice then to better -ert of a co approve this ordinance LcIdiately. Z will hake only one other succestion ;that this fee also be placed on projects now under construct' prior adez eonstznction. - i_inc; which will include all of �I pro j Sincerely, A. R. R.I tep. D�VEtAPY.Y. '+ CO:'RA�'Y Renry Reiter / -`j � CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: 1979 TO: city ty C Councinci l b Planning CarmisslIjon PRmi, Lloyd Hubbs, City EngineerVi. SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - CUCAMONGA CREEK TREE REMOVAL Atta;ied is treecremovala reently re ee replacement is possible referenced etter arrangements for water We will work with Caltrans and the Water District to make those arrangements B y'. AI( Or CA1a0ANIA- 1011NSSS A" 1R. MtTAiION AOWQ 10AWN0 G 110WN Il. G -....r EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DnlnCT 1. 1.0. lox nl t SAN 911HAS01N0. C UVOINIA 9201 (714) 383 -4142 r,- C k Q 01 Ell April 24, 1979 LITY OF 1T TICI- I CUCAT10EPOTA 08- SBd- 66 -5.0 08- 214701 APR 2 r 1979 AM 71130 11011110111213191516 Hr. Lloyd B. Ilubbs 1 City Engineer P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbs: Your letter of April 5, 1979, commented on the removal of several Eucalyptus trees along the south right of way line of Foothi:l Boulevard in conjunction with tt,e construction of the Cucamonga Channel Bridge. The plans for the Cucamonga Channel Bridge, as well as the detour plans were prepared by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. We concurred in their detour plan and issued the permit based on the fact that there was no other economically feasible alternate for a detour to bypass the construction site. We regret that the City was not given the opportunity to review plan details that led to this decision. Replacement trees are, of course, a possibility and Caltrans can arrange for the planting. Ilowever, some arrangement would be required by the City for watering the trees during the summer months for a year or two. Our Maintenance Branch does not have facilities in this area for plant or tree watering. llpon completion of the bridge contract, and upon your assurance teat the trees will be watered as required, we will coordinate tree replanting at this location with you. Concerning early review of plans for the Route 30 (19th Street) Cucamonga Creek plans, the Route E6 (Foothill Boulevard) crossing of Deer Creek and the Route 30 (Highland Avenue) Crossing of Deer Creek, we suggest that you discuss this with the San Ber- nardino County Flood Control District. We do not receive plans for these structures until their plans are nearly finalized. They have assured this office that in the future they will coordinate the channel crossingu with the city. Mr. Lloyd B. ilubbs Page 2 April 24, 1979 If you have any questions or require additional Information, please contact Mr. ?l. T. Griffin at 383 -4142 or write this office. Very truly yours, J. E. PEDDY District Director By M. Y. Griffin Drainage Engineer �r :sr• r � MEMORANDUM DATE: April 26, 1979 TO: City Council ._/ FROM: Lauren M. Wassen� SUBJECT: Historical Photograph Since it appears that Councilman West will soon be leaving the City Council, we thought it would be appropriate for us to schedule a formal photographic session for the City Council Peter Tolstoy has agreed to serve as the City's official photographer Pete has scheduled the photo for 6:30 p.m., prior to our regular council meeting next iednesday Beverly will be contacting each of you to remind you of the schedule. Our time will be somewhat limited, so please be prompt on Wednesday. LMW:Ik Q il � cf, Aso -s �r , etas 7 0, •SANTA FE LAND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY 121 East sum suht *A Santa Felodustries Company lea Mash. Calif. 90014. Tltaphw.a 2131629-0111 April 2, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Gentlemen: On March 21, 1979, we received a copy of the memorandum dated February 21, 1979, to the City Council and City Manager from the City Engineer, outlining a proposal to establish Systems Development and Drainage fees through- out the city of Rancho Cucamonga. We have reviewed the proposal and been exposed to the presentation to the Chattier of Connerce Industrial Committee and in general - concur that the city of Rancho Cucamonga has substantial drainage problems which can only be solved by the expenditure of large sums of money. In general, we agree with the City Engineer's proposal to establish a drainage district through- out the city to solve the various drainage problems, and while the proposed fee of S2,E00 per acre seems high at first blush, wa agree that it was ar red at through reasonable rationale. We do however wish to recommend some establishment or drainage fees. First, we wou be collected only on the issuance of a build!n of a subdivision or parcel map. our basis for mere filing of a parcel map or subdivision map physical drainage characteristics of the area is not until the property is actually loproved that the drainage characteristics are in fact with the reczewendltion Cade under storm drain fee on vacant parosls of a parcel map be elimi changes in the proposal for the d recom:end that the dr31nage fee permit rather than upon filing this recommendation is that the does not in any way change the ver which the map was filed, It which requires a building pemdt, hanged. We would therefore concur issue No. 1 that the payment of the Second, there should be a specific method in the ordinance to allow credit against fees for d:sign and construction work done on the system by developers along with specific provisions for reimbursement agreements for developers who have been forced to construct more than their share of storm drain improvements. Third, with regard to the last eentence of Section 2 of Ordinance No. 53 and Ordinance No. 60, we believe that a separate drainage district should be es- tablished for each of the three major flood control creeks which traverse the city; i.e., Cucamonga Creek Channel, Deer Creek and Day Creek. Many cities, in establish- ing their drainage districts, have successfully established districts based on the t City of Rancho Cucamonga -Z- April 2, 1979 area tributary to individual major channels. It appears to us that this would be a more equitable way to establish the districts rather than have one large district encompassing the total city for the following reasons: 1. The drainage area within which the most dynamic development is taking place will be assured that the funds contributed by that Particular drainage district will in fact be spent within their drainaggee district, to solve problems most re- lated to their development. 2. The establishment of drainage districts according to tributary areas is more equitable, a: each district can stand on its own, independent of actions taking place in other districts. 3. As development continues and /or intensifies in any particular drainage district, the City Council would have greater flexi- bility in adjusting fees for one individual district without necessarily affecting the total city. 4. It will insure that the drainage funds collected will be expended in accordance with the benefits received, since the funds would be required to he spent within the tributary area from which the funds were generated. One final point which we feel is worthy of consideration is that each of the special drainage district funds and systems development special funds, which are established as a repository for the collected fees, should also by orlinance, receive all earnings generated from investment of those funds so that the purchasing power of the deposited fees is not needlessly depleted, and so that earnings cannot be siphoned off for use on other things not related to the purpose for which the fees were originally collected. ke sincerely appreciate the opportunity to comment and strongly urge the Council to incorporate these suggested changes in your program. cc: Lauren Nassemmau, City Manager �5 Very truly yours. ly V1Le President :y P INTER- OFFICE MEMO DATE April 1, 1979 FROM Thomas Wickum, Captain PHONE 989 -6611 Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station TO Lauren Wasserman, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT Parking Ordinance a cw7n `` •. � fib Attached you wi. find a copy of a proposed ordinance completed by Bil- : -Iley regarding restrictions for recreational vehicles. The wording of the ordinance appears to be sufficient and would lend itself to easy prosecution. Section No. 3 of the ordinance defines the fine to - be paid This is a welcome addition to the ordinance, as all ordinances should have a section defining the fine to be paid As we have discussed in the past and as I have discussed with the Advisory Committee, any ordinance of this nature is very difficult to enforce The enforcement of such an ordinance would be Inconsistent due to limited staffing and will generally be enforced upon citizen complaint 1W:jes 12.1"7 400 R.I. I/.. •� ORDINANCE No -i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ESTABLISHING PARKING RESTRICTIONS FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLES _ The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: ATTEST SECTION l: It shall be unlawful for any eEt5a4 to park or store any house car, trailer, camp trailer, trailer coach, camper or boat upon any public street, highway, or alley within the City for longer than one hour between the hours of hg --a.Q. and std on any day SECTION 2: It shall be unlawful for the owner of any house car, trailer, camp trailer, trailer coach, camper or boat to allow the aforementioned to be parked or stored upon any public street, highway or alley within the City for longer than one hour between the hours of two a_ m. and six a_ ^m. on any day. SECTION 3: Any act declared unlawful by the provisions of - thi —is Ord nance is an infraction punishable by fine of twenty - five ($25 00) dollars SECTION 4: All words and phrases used in this Ordinance which are defined in the Vehicle Code of the State of California shall have the same meaning in this Ordinance „ as they have in the Vehicle Code APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1979. City Clerk Mayor Rancho Cucamonga row. .z E':' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. MEMORANDUM DATE: April 2, 1979 TO City Council b city Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer S SUBJECT: BASELINE STRE TEANDOHELLMAN AVENUE SAND ARCHIBALDF AT AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET Attached for Council review are proposals for the provision of design pla,s and specifications for the above referenced FAD signal projects Proposals were solicited from six firms with five responding Each of the firms are qualified to perform the work in a timely manner Listed below are the not to exceed budgets from each of the firms: ' 1 Mohle, Perry S Associates $3,400 2 Weston Pringle F Associates $3,800 3. Berryman 5 Stephenson, Inc. $4,200 4 Associated Engineers ;8,000 5. C G Engineering Based on these estimates, the Engineering Division recommends that the Council approve preparation of a contract agreement with Hohle, Perry b Associates to perform design services for these projects. This item will be added to,the April 4, 1979 Council agenda Item I for approval. l ReWEngineer ted, v LLO C1 LH:deb PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN MARCH, 1979 ASSOCIATQD �F=NGINQQRS s ■:0 316 East "E" Street 3901 Croton Street a Ontario. California, 91761 San Diego, California, 92110 Y� 714. 9865818 714 -224 -2467 - ?r?. Ll ! E PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN MARCH, 1979 Prepared Hy: ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS .116 Eest "E" Street Ontario, California 91'•b6 714,'966-5818 F Associated- Engineers CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 316 EAST *I* STREET'- • ONTARIO. OAL1i0RNIA 01764 • 1714) 911"817 March 28, 1979 Mr. Iloyd ilubbs. City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Subject: Engineering Sernces for iraffie Signal Design. Reference: Your Request for Proposals dat -' reh 7. 1979 (Attached as Enclosure "A "'. Dear Mr. Hobbs: We are pl eased I o have the opportunity to offer our services for the subject work and to submit t be at tacked Proposal together with a discussion of our qualifications for the type of work involved We appreciat c being conetdered for this work at.d :wk forward to working with your office. Very truly yours. ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS R.E. Mills, President REM/kb Enclosures •'mow- •.�•�p-;ay;. _ — l"Yb /.a PLAN SNG OESIONING SURVEYING - a:'4 me w., TA 13LE OF CONI EN fS I cu or of Irancmil tar • laLle of Contents Page No I. QUALIFICATIONS I • A Staff I U. Experience I -3 1 I'RUI'USAI. 4 e 111. FUCLOSURES A. March 7. 1979 REQU17°T 1'OR PROPOSALS • U. Associated Engineers Hourly Rates C. Key Personnel • • s tie• QUALIFICATIONS A. • A. STAFF Associated Engineers have had offices engaged In general civil engineering practice In Ontario since 1955 and San Diego since 1957 O although the Ontariq office is the parent company. We are adequately staffed and equipped to provide the required services Our Ontario staff Is over 30 employees or whom nine are licensed in the State • of California, seven as Registered Civil Engineers and two as Licensed Land Surveyors Resume's of key personnel are attached as Enclosure "C' D EXPERIENCE Our firm has designed traffic signal systems for the City of Chino at several intersections The first was at Central Avenue and Walnut • Subsequently to that we provided plans, specifications and cost estimates for signal systems at the Schaefer Avenue and Chino Avenue intersections, as part of an FAU project on Central Avenue. The Chino Avenue Intersection • required interconnection and coordination of the signals with four flashing light grade crossing signals with automatic gate arms Mr. Don ju!lus designed signal systems at a number of intersections • while with the City of Pomona However, if we are selected for this work we would assign Mr. Mohammad Raflaue as Protect I ?mincer and it is his extensive experience In this field upon which we will primarily rely. Ills i general resume' is Included in Enclosure "C" Ills experience relating more specifically to this project follows. While with the Engineering Department of the City of El Monte from 1970 to 1978, in addition to other municipal duties, he served as the Traffic t? Engineer for that City, responsible for all traffic design and ope. Uions. During J. his more than eight years with the City of El Monte his duties as Traffic • Engineer Included the following: (1) Design of fully actuated 8 phase signal systems no five (5) inter- sections on Peck Rd. - Valley Blvd. to Ramona Blvd - and Interconnection to newly installed Master Compirer at City flail Learned the progammtng or the computer Including coordination program. Attended various meetings and seminars with Multi - Sonic Corp., designer of the computer and controllers. • (2) Design of fully actuated, 8 phase signal systems at three (3) inter- sections on Santa Anita Ave. - Valley Blvd to San Bernardino Freeway in connection with the newly built -R T D. Bus Station Also Interconnected to - • master computer (3) Design or interconnection between City flail Master Computer to City Yard, 1 mile apart, for monitoring station • (4) Design of semi- actuated 2 phase signal system for Lnngo Toyota, new car dealer, at Valley Blvd just West of Santa Anita Blvd. • (5) Design of several other 2 phase flyed time signal systems at Inter- sections at various locations throughout the City (6) Design or fixed time, two phase and telephone Interconnection • signal systems at six (6) Intersections on Garvey Avenue from Peck Road to Westerly City limits In addition to design he also was responsible for inspection and coordination of work with the Contractor since at the time • the City had no City Electrician to provide Inspection services )' (7) Design or semi- actuated signal systems at four (4) Intersections on Derfee Ave. from Valley Blvd to Flneview Ave. This project was federally funded This required federal approval of th plans. The plans were approved as designed with only the addition of a few construction notes u (8) Most recent design was a very complicated Intersection of three A major streets, Valley Blvd., Valley Mall, and Ramona Blvd. It was designed fully actuated with 16 signal poles and 14 phases, some phases overlapping for left turn and through traffic movements • All of the signal systems mentioned in (1) through (8) nbove were designed with high pressure sodium vapor luminaires, Internally illuminated street name • signs and WALK - DON'T WALK push button pedestrian signals. (9) Ile was also responsible for maintaining traffic counts for public nformatton, design and speed zoning studies. • After leaving the City of £1 Monte he was employed by the firm of Motile - perry and Associates. Included in the Traffic Engineering work he did for that firm was an analysis for the City of Riverside of 32 intersections throughout • the City This study was for the purpose of modifying existing signal systems on Magnolia Avenue and various other streets. Mr Rafique has also kept Ills traffic engineering knowledge current • through extension courses at U.0 L A and through consultation with, and seminars conducted by, manufacturers of signal equipment and other traffic control hardware • r —3— 11. PROPOSAL We propose to accomplish all work at our regular hourly rates attached as Enclosure "B ". We will perform the work specified In Section IA of Enclosure A for a fee not t o exceed $5,600, not including printing costs We propose to rurni sh construction consultation services (Section I B) at the hourly rates in Enclosure "B'• when requested by the City Enclosure "B" applies through July 31, 1979 at which time we must Increase all wage rat es an anticipated 8% Any work after that date will be at rates 6% higher. It is also proposed that the "not to exceed" figure will be increased i by 6% of t hat portion or the work not completed by July 31, 1979, It is assumed that I f set ected we will be able to complete the work prior to that date, but thi s I s not entirely within our control since scheduling Is dependent on pr=es- sing t t me by both tha City and Cat Trans. We esti mate we can complete the work through the Preliminary Report (Item IA3, of Enclosure "A" within ten working days after the Notice to Proceed, and can complete plans and apecirications within 20 working days, after approval of the Preliminary Report. I J .. -4- .. ... .i No m• we • • • 0 V a C Enclosure "A" 1 • • r. u 6 • �1E� " "'lIJ••'t121919 S. pSSDLipiED 6i1G1N.ER Associated Engineersjob No 316 East "E" Street Ontario, California 91764 City of RANC110 CUCAMONGA Ifarch 7, 1y79 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR TRAFFIC S1GUAL DESIGN StRVICES Gentlemen: The City of Rancho Cucanonga is soliciting proposals for deslqn services for - trafflc signal installations at the intersections of Baseline and Hellman Avenue, Archibald Avenue and Church Street. These projects are to be funded under the Federal Aid Urban program with plans and specifications subject to review and approval by the Caltrans, District 8 Office. Federal funds will not be involved in the desiqn contract I SCOPE OF WORK The selected consulting firm will be required to perform the following: A. Design 1 Provide topographic surveys 1Pcessary .v anal; • .terSC,tjnn geometries and to prov,de base zaps fo; plan sher s r.. •n street plans will be provided by t City. (see i • •a d) 2 Analyze iltf.r•. .0tn 1-rakrle, for nere > - ^ry re•i+,lro pity a' tn', i'Me sees no need for street w.ik o, either of the project Inrations.) 3. Prepare preliminary report to review traffic movezen. •ata, traffic equipment options, estimates and phase segw nci e, •ith the City for approval. Traffic count data will be provired by the City. 4 Prepare traffic signal plans and specifications for City ad- vertisement in conformance with Federal and State regulations Plans will be plan checked by both the City and the State be- fore final approval Plans shall include intersection striping S. Prepare 20 sets of plans and specifications for bidding purposes. A -1 r• • Associated Engineers Page 2 March 8, 1979 5 Upon receipt of bids, the consultant shill analyze bids and make recommendation on award of contract B. Construction 1 Engineer shall be available for consultation during construction phase and make recommendations of contract change orders • II PROPOSAL REQUIREHEIITS Proposal shall include the following A Qualification of firm and key personnel including history of similar projects • 8 Project staffing. C. Schedule for completion of design for submittal to Caltrans D Project budget not to exceed maximum Printinq charges will be paid * at cost (burly rates shall be included for billing and construction phase consultation Seven (7) copies of the project proposal shall be submitted no later than 5.00 P.II , Friday, (larch 30, 1979, at the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Community Develop- ment Department, 9340 Baseline Street, Suite A Any questions on this proposal shall be directed to Mr. Paul Ro „iau at 989 -1851 4Cordially, • D e UBBS Engineer L811: deb 9' attachments A -2 I Ll 0 7� 10 UR VICINITY MAP NO SCALE A -3 WA 1 f! t � I t xiw[TtlnTn ♦ 'SG J RANCHO II u PROJECT REA F u � nuv courant x/x •I e•u Luc • •01"03 tt P OJECT AREA tt w _ Y �� CUCAMONGA iI J o = J • £ . C f r Y IOOTNILL 66 • 10 TIO III(ILV�6 j'�I nFIF'ONL VICINITY MAP NO SCALE A -3 WA 1 f! Enclosure "B" Associated Engineers CONSULTING CIVIL EN0114CERS 316 EAST'E' STREET • ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91784 • (7141 986 6918 HOURLY RALES (Effective 8/1/78 Principal Registered Civil Engineer $48.00 per hour Senior Registered Civil Engineer $40.00 per hour $40.00 per hour Principal Licensed Land Surveyor $35 00 per hour Associate Civil Engineer $35 no per hour _ Associate Lana Planner $32.00 per hour Registered Civil Engtreer Senior Designer /Draftsman $30.00 per hour $27 00 per hnur Designer /Draftsman $25 00 per hour Draftsman $22 00 per hour Varityping $16 00 per hour Key Punch Operator $16 00 per hour Secretariat • 3 -Man Survey Party $95 00 per hour 2 -Man Survey Party 575 00 per hcur 3 -Nan Survey Party with Electronic Distance $102.00 per hour Measuring Equipment 2 -Mnn Survey Party with Electronic Distance Measuring Lquipment b84.00 per hour These hourly robs do not include printing costs which are billed at cost or fees paid to Governmental agencies or others PUNNING DESIGNING SURVEYING i .f :7 t 4 1 • a . Enclosure ^C^ Robert E. Mills License: Civil Engineer Registration No. ),444 -State of California Professional Engineer Registration No. 3958 - Slate of Nevada Education: It ti in Civil Engineering - 1943 University of California, Berkeley, California Affiliations: Member - American Society or Civil Engineers Member - American Water Works Association Member - California Council Civil Engineers & land Surveyors Association Experience: Plant Construction, Kaiser Steel Corporation, Fontana, California, 1943 Active Duty with United States Navy Ship Repair Officer I'inal Duty - Officer in Chat go. floats Repair Facility N S F. Cavite, Phllllpine Islands, Rank Lt (J g ) 1943 - 1946 Employed by private consulting engineers, engaged in design of sewer systems and other municipal facilities, subdivisions, commercial and industrial building design, and general civil engineering work. 1946 - 1948 Group supervisor in Design Department or California Division of Dioways. In charge of qroup which designed first full Irccway section of San '• - nardino Freeway constructed in District VI I I. This w at the time the largest contract ever awarded In District V! I I Work included tie supportinq work, approaches and coordination for 16 bridge structures and interchanges. Work also included design or extensive storm drain system to drain the depressed section Also prepared drainage studies and reports for other projects 1948- 1951 City Engineer of Ontario, California Responsible for proper design and construction of public improvements in the City of Ontario bath by City forces and by private Interests Iu connection with subdivisions, 1951 - 1955 Partner, and then President of Associated Engineers. 316 fast "F" Street, Ontario, California, engaged In general civil rnginerring practice to Southern California Area 1911 - Present C -1 "fir R Lester H. Noreen License: Land Surveyor License No 3002 - State of Californir. Land Surveyor License No 3959 - State of Nevada Education: Two years Civil Engineering, Los Angeles City College, Los Angeles, California Affiliation: Member of American Congress of Surveying & Mapping Experience: Survey layout work at Camp Roberts. Fl Tot Marine Rase, Basic Magnesium Plant, Las Vegas and •arfous other sites. 1940- 1942 Three ycars In United States Navy "Seabees" with 27 months overseas duty as surveyor on airstrip and bese construction South Pacific 1942 -1944, Three years transitman - layoutman on various plant construction Jobs in Sou!hcrn California. 1945 - 1948 Loyola University, Los Angeles Union Oil Company, Wilmington United States Gypsum Plant, South Gate Seven years as Survey Party Chief with State of California, Division of Ilighways, mapping & triangulation, property surveys & construction layout in connection with Highway construction In District VI 11 1948- 1955 City Creek Highway Victorville - Barstow Freeway Survey Party Chief, Associated Engineers, 1955 - 1959 Partner in charge of all field parties and survey work, Associated Engincers, 316 East "F:" Street, Ontario, California, engaged In general civil engineering and land surveying practice in the Southern California Area 1959 - Present C -2 Mohammad Rafique Licensed: Civil Engineer Reglstration No. 29618 - State or California Education: 8 S. in Civil Englneerinq - 1959 University of Punjab. Pakistan Attended various Civil EnglncerinR Courses at Imperial Valley College; Yuba College: Los Angeles State College and U C L.A (Extension) Special Sewer and Storm Drain Design Course at Rio Hondo Junior College - 1971. Experience: Pr,jeet Engineer. Mohle, Perry & Associates, Fullerton In- cludeb dest Ri, or MTD storm drain, hydrology, hydraulics and basin calculations Overlay of three streets (two miles long) with related improvements Design of bikeway for Lakewood and traffic signnl% for Riverside. Preparation of preliminary project cost estimates 1978. Assistant Clvt, Engineer - City of El Monte Includes designs or street%, sewers, storm drains, water mains, traffic study and traffic sl Rnnls. Preparation or project related specifications Design of sewer pump stalion Including coordination and Inspec- tion with mnnufacturer and contractor. City Representative to newly built court buildinq, heired the Resident Engineer In solving the developed complex drainnge problem. Design of water syster for the buildinq Inspection or grade separation Durfee Aver.ie Including storm drain channel structure, redesign - inq of squash box to cross 93" MWD transmission water line with 60" stunt drain due to conflict in grades Eildge and retaining wall Inspection, steel detailing and quantity estimating of bridge structures Design of sewer facilities in connection with the bridge 1970-1978. Senior Englneerinq Aid - City or Montebello 1969 Chninman and Inslrumentman - Survey Pnrty - Department or Water Resources - State or California 1968 -1969. C -3 0 Donald A. Julius Licenses: Civil Engineer Registration No 17599 - State of Cnliforn:_ Civil Engineer Reg,sir:•!on No 15672 - State of Ohio Education: It S in Civil Engineering - 1943 Washington State College (University), Pullman, Washinglon Experience: joined Ontario staff as Project Engineer, in October 1970. Extensive project management background and experience in the fields of Flood Control, Storm Drains, Streets and High - ways Advanced Planner for the Engineering Depnrtment, City of Pomona. Prepared and maintained a city -wide Master plan of Storm Drains including the preparation and submission or iiond Issue Studies for the City under various Los Angeles County Mail Control District programs Made studies for and participated In design of the Chino Creek Project, in- cluding that portion from Riverside Drive to San Antonio Channel (within San Bernardino County); San Antonio Wash Channel; and performed the coordination work on the Thompson Creek and San Jose Creek Channels, now both constructed by the Corps of Engineers through Pomona. Has a thorough knowledge of Los Angeles County Float Control District and Corps or Engineers Standards and Practice, has utilized Los Angeles County Raid Department Standards as on South Campus Drive, Arrow Highway and other projects Completed a recent Associated Engineers project to the City of La Verne involving Los Angeles County Ploxl Con- trol 'Astrid and the Corps of Engineers with a drain to Live Oak Wash Channel Prior to Joining Associated Engineers, prepared a Mnsler Drainage Plan for an 850 acre residential development in the City of San Diego. Since joining Associated Engineers, he has utilired San Bernardino County Flood Control District and San Iirrnarlino County Road Department design criteria and stnndards on the Chino Airport, on subdivisions, studies for Assorinlyd Rock Praincis, a major quarry operating plate for -he hllidkuto Company C -4 William L Smelser • License: Civil lingincering Registration No. 21104. State of California Education: B 5 in Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Campus, 1966 • Experience: Staff ingineer, Carnation Company, Los Angeles, Includes design of piping and pumping systems, equipment and structural layout, total plant operation studies, and perparatlon of capital expenditure reports 1966— 1968 • Assistant llighway Engineer, District VIII, California Division of Highways, includes total design of major freeway projects, horizontal and vertical site planning of freeway bridge structures with multiple spans to 400 feet length - tunnel structure to 730 feet length - • bridge widenings - bmbankment plans, traffic studies and signing, construction Inspection of major freeway projects and smaller road projects, surveys, and planning studies. 1968— 1972 Assistant Highway Engineer, Sacramento (fridge Depart- ment. California Division of Ilighwnys, inrludes analysts and structural design of Slam freeway bridge - 150 feet span, cast -in -place prestressed box girder con- struction, 115 -20 -44 and alternative loading, gtccl reinforcing detailinq, detail checking and quantity estimating of bridge structures. 1969 • Fnemcering Design Supervisor, Associated Engineers, Ontario, California, presently engaged in general civil engineering practice Including planning, design , estimating, construction liaison of total sulalivi:.ion projects, and mobilchome parks, drninag^ studies and related Improve- ment projects, general public Improvement projects encompassing streets, sewer and wntrriines, drainage basins, well pump facilities, fire protection systems, and airports C -5 r, � 111 BERRYMAN & STEPHENSON INC. ID08 S COMMERCENTER EAST, SUITE 201, SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 02108 • TELEPHONE (711) 88/ 9261 March 30, 1979 111 11,,v.l It Ihddw I Ity In(;1nPUl City of Rancho Cucamonga p 0 [lox 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: Proposal for Professional Engineering Services - Design of Traffic Signals (FAU) 1 Baseline at Hellman Avenue 2 Archibald Avenue at Church Street Dear Mr Ilubbs: BERRYMAN AND STEPHENSON, INC. apprt. .ate the opportunity to submit this proposal to provida a n quality professionnl engineering sorvicv for the dosign of traffic signaip The prajv,t will includv the preparril inn of n prvliminRry traffic control report. Irnffic signni desilpl plans, spucifientluuv, and cost estimate for the Intersections of Baseline at Hallman Avenue and Archibald Avenue at Church Street. This is n Federal Aid Urban (FAIL) project, therefore, design will conform to rederal and State guldolines BERRYMAN AND STEPHENSON, INC is committed to meeting the needs Of governmental agencies through providing a comprehensive professional engineering product. The experience and capabilities of the firm's principals, associates, and support staff guarantees that the City will receive a product conforming to the professional code of engineering excellence. The firm is intimately familiar with the needs of governmental agencies as we are currently the City Engineer /Traffic Engineer for the Cities of Adelanto, Stanton, Los Alamitos, Yorba Linda, and Villa Park; City Traffic Engineer for the City of Carson, and previously the City Engineor for the City of Garden Grove and Huntington Park on an interim basis. Some of the key advantages for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to utilize the services of BERRYMAN AND STEPHENSON, INC. include: Mr. Lloyd R Hobbs March 30, 1979 Page 2 Projects similar to the project requested by the City have recently been completed by BSI These have technologies state- of- the-art. Personnel assigned to the projectlt;rewiighlxovi • llified and knowledgeable of the ndi rxcelirnt comm •III I cn t 111114 immrd lntc ProductivltY ni.n ntaiucd w,111 Ihr tj y throughout the P,nJccl BSI is currently consulting City Traffic Engineer for six cities, working with coordination syatcros and traffic signals on a daily basis. We arc very aware of maintenance problems associated with many designs which can prove costly tots city is very firm and has completed numerous PAU projects familiar with recent policies and requirements in submitting projects for approval. PAU traffic signal projects have recently been completed Grove, San Diego, La Mesa, Carson, Alamitos, and other cities A traffic signal was desgned State review and npproval) we are excited about the prospects of providing our services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and place great importance on providing a design for the City that will time schedule�,aandnceds. Attached is our proposed scoe of work, professional fees for the proposed Respectfully submitted, BERR)YMANN AND STEPHENNSSON, INC. William E Strecker, P.E Vice President WES:dw attach. PROPOSAL FOR UISIGN OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT BASELINE AND IIE..LMAN ARCHIBALD AND CLURCM SCOPE OF hJRK Introd:ction this Is a proposal to Provide professional tr•Iffie eogineering selvitvs to Lilo l Ily ul Itaarlul I:emongn 1' providing Design ur fit'. pal pow ul' e construction of two trnl'fic signals on Baseline at Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue at Church Street. Traffic signal designs, Plans, contract documents, and cost estimates utilizing FAU format will be provided as one bid package to the City Design plans will be provided at a scale of 1 " -20' or larger whore special clarity is required Ink on linen or mylar and City approved title block will be utilized and the design will conform to City, State, and FAU criteria Following is a discussion of our proposed approach to this project and an outline of our specific work program Project Approach BERRYMAN AND STEPHENSON. INC proposes to provide a comprehensive professional engineering service In preparing a complete Package of construction plans, specifications, and cost estimates Additionally, BSI will provide coordination with agencies and utility companies for technical consultations and project review during the design The Project and effective ncommunications dwith tthe Cityothroughoutitheiproject This clesc communication will be accomplished through meetings between the Project Engineer and City staff to discuss the project status and exchange any questions that may occur It is proposed that these meetings be held at the following critical points: I. Beginning of Project Discuss City's traffic operations philosophy, obtain existing traffic data, and pertinent improvement plans 2. Preliminary Report ( Conceptual Design) The preliminary operations report will be submitted to the City, including conceptual signal design p City's lans . The report and conceptual plans will be reviewed with the Project Director. 3. Final Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimate Review of final product prepared by conformance to City, State and FAU criteria. This approach will provide a completed product in the nost expeditious time frame possible, Work Program 1. Collect Available Data from the City a. Traffic counts for intersection Is Avvident Motto c Existing traffic signet Improvement plans d Speed data available for intersection approaches e Plans and locations of existing utility lines Z Prepare and Present Preliminary Operations Report - This report will be prepared by a professional Traffic Engineer and include the following: a Discussion of intersection geometries analysis from our field reviews and investigations b. Analysis or traffic movement data to determine recommendations for traffic control equipment, cost estimates, and proposed signal phasing c Conceptual design utilizing pencil on blueprint of intersections for discussion, review and comments d Conceptual design to include pole type, height, and locations, mast arm lengths; era detector placement 3 Provide final plans including intersection ztriping plan, specifications and cost estimate, to FAU criteria Provision for technical consultation with City, State and Federal officials within the City's local area is included in our professional services Technical consultation during bid advertising and answering questions from contractors about our plans will also be provided 4. Provide professional consultation in the analysis of bids and recommendation for award of contract "i tJ, S. Technical consultation during construction phase and recommendations for change orders, if necessary, can be provided. Construction change orders as a result of BSI design has been a rare occurrence as experienced in our previous projects. TIME SCHEDULE BERRYMAN AND STEPHENSON, INC. is prepared to begin immediately on this project upon receipt of n Notice to Proceed from the City life following ttma schedule is proposed 1'ru l lnf i nn ry tip urotluu� Conceptual Plans City Review Period Preliminary ME Caltrans Review Final PSBE IW pu rt and 3 weeks 3 weeks A weeks G -8 weeks 2 weeks This schedule can be modified to suit the City's needs PROJECT PERSONNEL In keeping with the firm's commitment to providing a principal as Project Director of each project, this project is proposed to be under the direction of Mr. William E. Strecker, P.E., Vice President of BERRYMAN AND STEPHENSON, INC Mr. Stracker is a registered Civil Engineer and Traffic Engineer with experience in directing numerous traffic design and civil engineering Improvement projects Mr. Stracker will be assisted by Mr. Dave Plechas, P.E., as Project Engineer. Mr Plechas is a registered Traffic Engineer with over thirteen years of experience in traffic operations and design with public agencies. Mr. Robert Stone and /or Mr. Tram Hartzog are proposed to be the Senior Designers assigned to this project. Mr Stone has over six years of experience in traffic operations, signal designs, and plan preparation Mr. Hartzog has over twelve years of experience in traffic operations, signal designs, and plan preparation. Both are committed to the firm's philosophy of providing for the exact needs of the client PROFESSIONAL FEES BERRYMAN AND STEPHENSON I INC. proposes to provide the set-rices outlined in this proposal on a fixed fee basis in accordance with the following schedule: Preliminary Report $ 400 Traffic Signal PSGE 3700 Printing of 20 sets PSGE Cost and Preliminary Report Bid Analysis and Award s0 yrz00— The above includes consultation during bid advertising. Consultation during construction phase after the first 4 hours will be charged at our 3Luudurd hourly rates as follows Registered Engineer /Traffic Engineer $39 n0 Senior Designer 34 50 Designer 29 50 Draftsman 24 UU PAYMENT SCHEDULE The following payment schedule is proposed for this project: Completion of Conceptual Plans 401 Submittal of Final PS&E 901 Award of Construction Contract 1001 (within 45 days of final PSf,E submittal) RELATED EXPERIENCE BERRYMAN AND STEPHENSON, INC. has been involved in numerous traffic signal design and coordination projects Following is a partial list of representative projects: _City of Anaheim - Downtown Traffic Signal Coordination and Impact Study Project determined the traffic coordination needs for the redevelopment area of downtown Anaheim. The study involved the determination of a computerized master control for coordination of the downtown traffic signals with Citywide expansion capabilities. This study involved a signal systew, network on four artorials and the initial design of eight traffic signals. City of Garden Grove - Citywidn Computerized Traffic Signal Grid System Project provided the plans and specifications for a computerized master control and system for over seventy intersections within the City. Included was the "Before" and "After" studies, traffic signal timing determination, and programming the Multisonics computer. This project was funded by a grant under the FAU program. { F City of Los Alamitos - Traffic Signal Coordination System for Katclla Avenue Project includes traffic signal designs, interconnection, and coordination equipment for Katella Avenue which will relieve the delay and congestion due to the Los Alamitos Rare Tract traffic This project is being constructed under FAU funding. City of San Diego - FAU (SOS) Traffic Signal Designs (3 intersections) Tha designs are now installations consisting of plans, .pr.,f irntlnn nod entimate rn, rnrh or th.• ioler%velione. Ihv lu tveyvrt Ion•t uro unit re l utcd, its they are- I.uc.,l v.l at various areas within the City City of Ln Ffesa - FAU (5) Traffic Signal Designs The design of these signal installations includes the interconnoction of three intersections which will become part of a future system and the design provision for Emergency Vehicle Pre- emption system at five of the intersections WILLIAM F. STRACKER Vice President EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, California State University, Long Beach, California Master of Science Studies in Civil Engineering, California State University, Long Beach, California 1,•1))l sale anus• ul 1111ni,lp.11 l•uhi it NUlt•• A,Imn11•.l sat nm, iJ11tU111)J "fall' 11111rl't'•IIs, 1.0% Augelr•.. t.11114Inne PRull SSIONAL RIGISTRATIONS. Registered Ciril Lngineer, State of California Regis'_red Traffic Rngincer., State of California PROFISSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS: American $moiety of Civil Engineers - President American slobs is Work 4ssociation Institute of Transportation Engineers 1 CI•I RI 1'NC1.: yr. Strael.rr joined IIIRRTMAN AND STi Pl IENSON, IN( n1 Ovcvmbel, lulu, for the pulPo +e n: Pruvldiug technical expertise :unl : omprchencirc Prof.••,slonal asclstance to novernmental ageucies from May 1975 to November 11176, lie was assistant Traffic Engineer far the City of Anaheim where he was t.:sponsille for various traffic planning, design and impact studies; nd was traffic 9•or..n..•ranr. sir r-..,o to ( :ity N,1 IrimVIII%, I :unl rJa•lors, I•lannulg fr.amia •. -fun and Cily Council. Prom .tune 1971 to April 1975, Mr. ,tracker was in the civil engineering design section of the Cite of Anaheim where he administrated and designed many major civil engineering improvement projects and studies including a two mile FAU street improvement project, major street and storm di.io improvements, revised the City Master Plan of Drainage, stabililation of a large alluvial channel through a major golf course, and steel and concrete structures. Earlier, from Alay 1969 to June 1972, Mr. Stracker was designer for an Orange County civil engineer, consultant for the design Of a golf t:ourse in the Hawaiian islands, and civil engineering designer for the City of Costa Mesa. DAVID M. PLECUnS EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California PROrESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Registered Trnffic Engineer, St..te of Cnlffprnin I'luil I•.'+ I I INAL AY,111 IAT IUNS Institute of Transportation Engineers Americaa Public Works Association Trnffic Signul Association Ill,iminating Engineering Society _ EXPERIENCE: Mr Plechas joined BERRYMAN AND STEPIIENSON, INC. in December 1977 for the purpose of providing technir.tl expertise and comprehensive Professional assistance to governmental agencies. From September 1965 to December 1977, Mr. Plechas served tho City of Unrdena in vnrlous professional engineering capncities, mt.,t recently its Engineering Services Munnger /i lty Traffic Engineer Ilis experience includes planning for trangpurtution systems and land use, analysis of traffic capacities, deficiencies, impacts, and hazards; technical supervision of traffic operations and maintenance; and the design of various public works improvements including traffic controls, lighting, parking facilities, and streets Other responsibilities included Traffic Commission administration, coordination with transit operations, contract administration, and liaison with regional transportation agencies Earlier, as a Civil lingincering Aggistant in the Dolt rtment of Witt,i :iiid Power, Nr Plccha'. was invnlvpd in the design of w.iter de-.1 ributiun %y'.tcni♦ Ibr the Illy ul Lus Angele . ROBERT B. STJNE EDUCATION Studies in Engineering Technology at San Bernardino Valley College with special emphasis in Traffic Engineering. Studies in Business Administration at Santa Ana College and Cypress College rxvrnIENCE: Mr Stone joined Berryman and Stephenson, Inc. in November 1078 to provide technicnl assistance to governmental agencies fn Traffic and Trnnsportation Engineering. 1'rom 1973 to 1078, with the City of Buena Park, Mr Stone performed a variety of tasks in the Traffic Engineering Division As an rngincering Technician, he performed traffic signal designs including field analysis, design, specifications, estimates, assisted in construction inspection and functional follow -up analysis; also, he performed striping design, construction delinention plans, and supervised the traffic maintenance /striping crew During certain periods of time with the city, he assisted in Civil Engineering design tasks. from 1970 to 1973, with the City of San Bernardino Traffic I'ngincering, Mr Stone performed field data surveys and studies and comprised them into recorded informational graphics C G ENGINEERING Conau(tanta /a Government March 28, 1979 ! Mr. Lloyd B. Hubbs ! City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline, Suite A Pancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ! Subject: Baseline Avenue at Hellman Avenue, and Archibald Avenue at Church Street. Proposal for Professional ! Traffic Engineering Services for FAU Traffic Signal Project. Your Request for Proposal dated March 8, 1979. ! Dear Mr. Hubbs: C G Engineering (C G) appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide professional traffic engineering services for ! the phases of work required to prepare design plans, specifications, 'k and an engineer's cost estimate (PSBE). This will include project fk planning and coordination with other agencies; particularly the ! utility companies, sewer and water agencies, the County of San Bernardino, and Caltrans. This proposal is predicated on your RFP, a field review of the proposed project, and discussions with you and Mr. Paul Rougeau. In addition, this proposal will present ! an offer to provide specialized field inspection services during the construction phase. This ancillary proposal would make it ,0___ possible for the City to obtain certification from Caltrans which ! would permit the City to e:u:rcise complete control of the construc- tion, scheduling, and contract administration phases of the work ! PROJECT DESCRIPTION ! This project consists of the design of two new traffic signal systems. The site locations are Bascline Avenue at Hellman Avenue, and Archibald Avenue at Church Street. SCOPE OF PROPOSED SERVICES ! General The scope of the proposed services is a complete and comprehensive .! design service as outlined in the RFP This will include the preparation of plans, specifications, engineer's bid estimates of I 2627 SO. WATERMAN AVENUE, SUITE E • BAN BERNARDINO, CAUFORNIA 02408 • RIO 8242420 'i �i Mr. Lloyd B. Hubbs -2- March 28, 1979 costs, the furnishing of topography and other pre - design input, Coordination planning, and all the required coordination with others. will include attendance at all necessary meetings, and cicse coopera- tion with the City staff in making submittals to Caltrans to obtain the ,ea ding to advertising for construction bids required approvals s conducted by the City PROJECT SPECIFICS 1 Defining Stanai Operation Requirements The initial thrust of the design effort will be to determine desired al ain traffic tmovement characteristics the - basic nnalysis analysisconsultant andsturnlmovement recognize factors Introduced by the varying traffic movements of the AM, middoy, and PM peak periods. It is oar endarstandino been obtained by that all the required counts have previously counts CtGBaseline the City, and HellmanxAvenues This will The intersection turning movement counts will aid in the analysis oftleft- turnn warrants awill also includeaaireview of past accidents involving left- turning vehicles. He will also consider the projected and anticipated traffic volumes t n halso will be given to the anticipat d growth patter nsin the City. These factors will consolidate a data base from which we will make recommendations to the City. At each of the project intersections an analysis will be made rf the arterial and side street traffic volumes. This data will be used to base a recommended timing and operational program to be employed when the signals become operational include determination of the various Specifically, this will increments of signal timing, and the operating modes of vehicle detectors. In accordance with the RFP, intersection geometrics will be be examined by C G Recommendations, if any. will presented to the City staff. i �1 a Mr. Lloyd B. Hubbs -3- March 28, 1979 In summary, the product of this first ynase will permit a determination of the operational plan for each of the project intersections. It is therefore proposed that this determination of an operating plan for each intersection be developed as the initial step in the design process. We believe that early mutual agreement between C G, the City staff, and Caltrans officials on operational specifics will lead to cost effectiveness in the selection of equipment, ease of operation, and future maintenance costs 2. Design The second project phase is proposed to be the preparation of design plans at a scaie.of V-20'. The plans will include: signal standard and signal head layout, detector layout, conduit and pullbox layout, pole schedule, conductor table, sensor table, phase diagrams, overhead and underground utilities including water and sewer lines, applicable topographical features, and construction notes. Each of the proposed installations will require a determination of the desired pedestrian and vehicular detection to be employed. It is proposed that the project specifications shall be written in accordance with the current 1978 State Standard Specifications and State Standard Plans, with modifications to reflect special requirements of the project. It is further proposed that the complete set of plans will include four (4) sheets; specifically, a title sheet, a design layout of each signal intersection, and a striping plan illustrating required striping, pavement markings, crosswalks, and signing related to both intersections. The latter sheet is proposed to be at c scale of 1 ° -50'. In accordance with the RFP, C G will furnish twenty (20) complete sets of plans and specifications to the City for bid advertisement and other distribution. At the completion of all project work, we will also deliver to the City the originals of plans, specifications, and supportive data. 3. Project Coordination One very important part of this project will be coordination with Caltrans, other local agencies, the utility companies, and special service districts. It is proposed that C G will assume n r 0 i i Mr. Lloyd B. Hubbs -4- March 28, 1979 the responsibility and initiative in this regard. The intent is to provide a complete design service: one which includes the City at all significant steps of the process. It is anticipated that the extent of City involvement during the design phases of this project shall never need to be more than one of review and approval of C G's progress and recommendations In accordance with the RFP, C G will prepare a bid summary and a recommendatic., to the City with regard to award of a contract. 4 Construction Consultation and System Start-Up As stated in the P.R. C G will at all times be available for consultation and will provide professional assistance during the bidding process, the construction phase (construction inspection excepted) and at the time of system turn-on. 5 Construction Inspection Services This is ancillary to the main body of the entire proposal and was not a part of the RFP. It is proposed that C G Engineering can provide a complete resident field inspection service during the construction phase of this project This would include all supervision of the contractor's progress, assure compliance with the plans and specifications, compliance with safety regulations, assure the convenience and safety of the traveling public, and would include the maintenance of all necessary project records. This would Include preparation of progress payments to the contractor and the preparation of final "as built" plans. Federal Aid Urban requirements are that construction supervision oust meet the foregoing scope in order that the City may be certified to administer this phase of the project. The alterna- tive is that Caltrans would provide this service and assess the costs to the contract The advantages to the City to adminis- tering this very important phase of the work are direct control of the work, timely progress, safety and convenience to the public, and good public relations. Mr Lloyd B. Hubbs -5- Marce 28, 1979 C G Engineering has, in the past, been certified by Caltrans to perform contract administration and construction inspection on Federal Aid projects as follows: a) Mountain View Avenue R.R. Grade Separation $2,100,000 (FAU -R033) City of Loma Linda b) Traffic Signal Improvements (FAU- M -R034) $68,000 Anderson @ Redlands Anderson @ Barton C) Traffic Signal Improvements (FAU- M -R034) $85,000 Anderson @ Academy It is proposed that this service be provided at an hourly cost on an as- needed basis In summary, the entire SCOPE OF PROPOSED SERVICES is intent upon providing a complete service which, in effect, will provide an extension of the City staff; one which will vr:y the project through initial planning, design, review, contract aw+ird, system turn-on, and other administrative functions which result in a complete and satisfactory product. TIME SCHEDULE It has been noted to the RFP that Federal funds are not involved in the design contract He are prepared to begin work on the project Immediately upon execution of a contract and notice from the City to proceed. It is proposed that a PS&E submittal could be made to Caltrans within 90 calendar days, or less. The remainder of time required to complete the scope of services to the time of bid advertisement will depend upon timeliness of the required approvals from Caltrans It is estimated that this process, which 1s beyond our control, may require an additional 90 days. PROJECT MANAGEMENT It is proposed that the project engineer for this project be one of our key staff members, and an experienced traffic engineer and signal designer, Mr William Dundas. Mr. Dundas is a Registered Traffic Engineer to California and an active member of the Institute of Transportation Engineers since 1960. Mr. Dundas has a comprehensive experience in municipal engineering including special experience as the Assistant Traffic Engineer of Contra Costa County, the Assistant Traffic Engineer of the City of Garden Grove, and City Traffic Engineer of Newport Beach. In addition, Mr. Dundas has served with LFE Corp. (Automatic Signal Division) as a traffic signal system specialist. We consider Mr Dundas highly qualified to direct the work of this project. As president of C G Engineering, the overall responsibility for superior performance and engineering judgement to directing this project will rest with me. My own qualifications in this regard may be noted in the attached resume. He believe that because our office is centrally located within a short distance from the project locality, the Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, and the raltrans District Offices in San Bernardino, this will add assurance of the closest possible coordination between the consultant and the City staff. It is proposed that the fee to provide the foregoing scope of services will be reimbursed on a time and material basis in accordance with the attached schedule of hourly rates and services. It is further proposed that the fee for professional engineering and design servcies (excluding construction inspection services) shall not exceed $6000. It should be noted that approximately $200 of this figure is estimated to be printing and reproduction charges at actual cost. If the City should elect construction inspection services (optional) it is proposed that the fee shall also be on a time and material basis subject to negotiation Again, we appreciate this opportunity to present this proposal to you. If you should have any questions, or should wish additional information, we will welcome your call. �N- �.11°.l3oCF.yLV?� r- Noel L. Christensen President f' STAFF RESUME C G Engineering (C G) specializes in providing consulting services to local governmental agencies in the areas of civil engineering and traffic engineering. Accordingly, the work which we produce 1s always consistent with the client agency's standards, and is very thorough and clear. Our reputation has been built, in part, on our timely completion of contractual obligations and our ability to meet our client's scheduling needs We do not make commitments we can't keep. If we present a time frame for completion of a project, we meet it, providing events beyond our control do not occur, and we make every effort to keep such events to the absolute minimum. C G specializes in putting together bidding packages which are clear and complete so the contractor knows precisely what he is bidding on and the client knows exactly what the finished product will be. We've found this to result in good bids, smooth - running p ojects, and completion of construction on schedule. The principals of C G are Noel L Christensen, A.E., President - Owner, and John A. Starner, P.E., Project Manager Taken together, their experience amount to in excess of 27 years in government and 14 years as consultants to governmental agencies which provides C G with an extremely broad back - gound in the civil engineering field Brief resumes for Mr. Christensen and Mr. Starner follow: Noel L. Christensen, President -Owner Education Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering - South Dakota State University. 1961 Experience President, C G Engineering, 1974 -79 Vice President, Lampman and Associates, 1972 -74 Director of Public Works, City of Rialto, 1970 -72 Principal Engineer, City of Riverside, 1967 -70 Assistant Highway Engineer, State of California, 1961 -67 Professional License Registered Civil Engineer No. 15398 - State of California T John A. Starner - Project Manager Education Formal Education - San Bernardino Valley College Experience Project Manager, C G Engineering, 1977 -79 Office Manager, Ludwig Engineering, 1977 Project Manager, Vice President, C H Engineering, 1972 -77 Assistant Highway Engineer, State of Californ ia, 1970 -72 Professional License Registered Civil Engineer No 20975 - State of California Registered Civil Engineer in Arizona, Nevada, Oregon and Colo,,ado Our practice is for one of our principals to be directly in charge of each project we are engaged in so that if questions arise or status reports are required the principal in charge can provide the necessary Infe mation to the client without the loss of time or accuracy resulting from moving too far up or down the information chain The principals are assisted by the following staff: Name Position Beryle F. Brown Public Works Inspector William A. Dundas, P.E. Traffic Engineer Ronald K. Fowler, R.G. Design Draftsman Stanley F. Hardy Traffic Signal Inspector Valerie N. Husbands Administrative Assistant William P. Kaminsky, L.S. Design Draftsman Vana R. Olson Design Draftsman Robert J. Scarborough Design Draftsman Ricardo T. Ynostroza Design Draftsman In addition to the above listed office and field staff, re have contract surveyors to complete field survey requirements as follows: Fred C Cole, L.S. Surveyor Ted Fike, L.S. Surveyor AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY C G Engineering has provided in the past and will continue to provide employment opportunities for qualified individuals regardless of race, color, religion, sex or creed. Employees are recruited through newpaper advertisements in the San Bernardino and Riverside general circulation newspapers Since this has not produced an overabundance of minority applicants in the past, future job advertisements will also be included In area minority publications. Employees are provided the opportunity of professional growth through increased job responsibility to the degree they wish to participate. PREVAILING HOURLY RATES Jam ary, 1979 OFFICE Principal Engineer (Professional) 544.00 /Hr. Protect Marager (Professional) 40.00 /Hr. Traffic Engineer (Professional) 39.00 11ir. Designer - Draftsman 28.00 /Hr. Draftsman 24.00 /P.r. Engineering Aide 19.00 /Hr. Clerical 11.00 /Hr. FIELD Resident Engineer (Professional) 39.00 10r. Inspector (Licensed) 39.00/Hr. Inspector (Unlicensed) 28.00 /Hr. Field Surrey Supervisor (Licensed) 39.00 /Ha. 2 Man Survey Party 68.00 /Hr. 3 Man Survey Party 90.00/Hr. Electronic Measuring Device 60.00 /Day MISCELLAREOUS SERVICES A30 EXPEKSE5 Mileage 0.15/M1. Prints, Copying, Reproduction Cost Outside Consultant Services Cost a Weal i4 P►IiI & osi AsoadoW TRAFFIC 6 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING March 28, 1979 Mr. Lloyd Hobbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P.0 Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr Hobbs: We are pleased to submit this proposal to provide prefessional engineering services relative to the preparation of plane, specifications and estimates - for traffic signal installation in the City of Rancho Cucamonga This proposal is based upon the City's request for proposals and our discussions with representatives of the City Staff. In general, the work would consist of the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS6E) for the installation of traffic signals at the following locations: Baseline and Hellman Avenue Archibald Avenue and Church Street All work would be coordinated with the City Engineer Staff. Since FAU funds will be utilized for these projects, all work would conform to applicable State and City Standerds. It is understood that Federal funds will not be utilized for the design portion of this project. We would envision the following specific tasks to be required for the completion of this work TASK 1 - DATA COLLECTION We would assemble all available data pertinent to the design of these traffic signals. This would Include existing street improvement ,d plans, traffic volumes and similar Information. Contact would be 2651 EAST CHAPLIAN AVENUE • SUITE 110 • FULLERTON. CALIFORNIA 92631 • (714) 971.2931 . J . -2- made with the various utilities to obtain information relative to the location of their facilities A field review would be made of each site to familiarize ourselves with existing conditions and obtain any needed data. Discussions would be hold with members of the City and CalTrane otaffs to obtain any additional background information and City requirements. It is not anticipated that extensive additional traffic counts would be required except at Baseline and Hellman Avenue where AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts would be completed. TASK 2 - PRELIMINARY DBSICN i, A preliminary design would be completed at each location. This would include general equipment type and location, controller options, phasing sequences, cost estimates and similar information. These _ data would be reviewed with the City Staff to obtain conceptual 4' �K approval of the designs. It is not anticipated that this would consist of a formal report but would be a "wotking" level document TASK J - PLANS A plan would be prepared for each location with a design based upon the results of Task 2. The plans would be on linen sheds and con- form to City and CalTrane standards. Included on the plans would be the location of all equipment, conduit runs, service, the size and number of conductors in each run, phasing diagrams, and notes Striping and pavement marking plans would also be prepared. TASK 4 - SPECIFICATIONS The Special Provisions Ceetion of the Specifications would be prepared to include the spacial requirements wf the design. Thesp would be coobined with the required bid documunts and PAU requiremputs to form a complete "Bid Package" for the project It is understood that 20 sets of plans and specifications will be required Reduced plans would be included in the "Bid Package ". -3- TASK 5 - ADDITIONAL SERVICES Cost estimates would be prepared for the preliminary and final designs we would be available to review bids for the work and make a recommen- .ation on award of contract. This proposal does not include technical Inspection services during installation, although we would be available to answer questions and for consultation relative to the design We would be prepared to begin work on this project upon receipt of authorization from the City. the prelimianry design would be submitted for review by the City within three (3) wake. Preliminary PS&E would be submitted within four (4) weeks of receipt of approval of the preliminary design. Final PS&E and the "Bid Packages" would be completed within three (3) weeks of receipt of com- ments on the preliminary PS&E, This represents a total time of ten (10) wccks excluding review time by the City and CalTrane. Our fe. for completing the work as outlined in this proposal would be based upon our Standard Rate Schedule, a copy of thick is attached and made a part hereto. The maximum fee for this work would be $30800.00. Invoices would be submitted monthly for work performed. Mr. Weston S Pringle, P E. would be the Project Engineer for thla work and be personally involved in the design. Mr. Pringle is a registered Civil and Traffic Engineer in the State of California and fine extensive experience in traffic signal design for variors jurisdictions. A resume of his experience and background is attached for your Information A partial listing of pre- vious traffic signal designs completed by our firm to also ♦ttached. We are currently completing PAU funded projects in the Cities of Cla-emont and Thousand Oaks. in addition, we are working with CalTrane, District 8, on a traffic signal design on the Corona Expressway (Route 71) These latter assignments provide valuable background for the proposed project. We appreciate having the opportunity of submitting this proposal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and look forward to working with you on this project. If -4- you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us' Respectfully submitted, ��� SOC TES Weston S. Pringle, P.E. i.SP:cd westa Ptis9k ma A o TRAFFIC a IHARJrun,wuw„ —- STANDARD RATE SCHEDULE Effective October 15, 1978 Professional Staff Hourly Rates Firm Principal $ 50.00 35.00 Senior Engineer Associate Engineer lasistant Ungineor 25.00 20.00 Support Staff Engineering Draftsman $ 20.00 12.00 Field Supervisor 10.00 Secretary 8.00 Clerical, Field Enumerator General 1. Travel, reproduction, telephone, supplies, and other non-wage direct costs are billed ar cost plus ten (10) percent. 2. Hourly rates apply to travel in addition to working time. 3. For presentations or appeardnees at formal hearings, depositions, or court testimony, the following rates apply. Travel time is included in the number of hours indicated. Preparation time is charged at normal hourly rates. Firm Principal Senior Engineer Over 5 hours 5 hours or less $500.00 $300.00 750.00 200.00 4. Statements will br ubndtted monthly for work in progress or upon com- pletion of work. Statemnts are payablr within 30 days of lecefpt. Any invoice unpaid after 60 days $hall have service charges added at a rate of 1.5 percent per month on the unpaid balance. Compensation for services performed will not be contingent upon the necessity of client to receive payment from other parties. 5. American tSociety bofrCivil Engineers' Manualsan� l Engineering Practice Number 45. 2651 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE s SUITE 110 . FULLERTON. CALIFORNIA 02631 • (714) 871.2931 WESTOW STEWART PRINGLE Registered Professional Engineer: State of California Fellow. Institute of Transportation Engineers; Member, American Society of Civil Engineers; President, Southern California Section, Institute of Trans- portation Engineers; Secretary - Treasurer, Western District, Institute of Transportation Engineers; Delegate, Program Development Conference, Institute of Transportation Engineers; Member, Special Publications Committee, Institute of Transportation Engineers; Senior Editor, 'Technical Notes ", Institute if Transportation Engineers. Institute of Transportation Engineers Technical Committee Activities: Parking Facilities for Industrial Plants; Traffic Improvement Data Colleens,- Guidelines; and Traffic Characteristics and Considerations for Tomorrow's Airport¢. Mr. Pringle has had a varied experience in both the planning and operational fields of traffic engineering. Some of the projects with which he has been involved include: Transportation Planning - circulation and transportation elements of general plans for cities; freeway location and impact studies; access, circulation and parking systems for industrial plants, airports, central business districts, colleges, shopping renters and other developments; traffic impact analysis for environmental impact reports. Traffic Operations - TOPICS areavide plan studies for eleven cities; traffic signal and traffic signal system design; parking studies; street and parking lot lighting designs; school safety programs; access, eirculatton and parking studies for commercial, residential, and public developments. In 1971 Mr. Pringle participated in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Study Mission to Europe and Moscow. This included an opportunity to study traffic and transportation in Munich, Berlin, Paris, Moscow and London, and provides a valuable addition to hit experience. Educational Qualifications: California State University - Fresno, Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1960; Certificate, Municipal Public Works Admin- istration; Lecturer in Transportation and Traffic Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. Prom 1960, Mr. Pringle has been Civil Engineering Assistant, City of West Covina; Assistant Traffic Engineer, Traffic Engineer and Associate Civil Engineer, City of Downey; Principal Engineer, Wilbur Smith and Associates, Consulting Engineers, Los Angeles; Vice President of Lampean and Associates, Consulting Engineers. Pomona; and Vice President, Crommelln- Pringle and Associates, Inc., Placentia. v Weat . ?Vgte w d. AaawiaW TRAFFIC A TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGNS 1. City of Anaheim - Hr. Paul Singer, Traffic Engineer A total of 12 intersections were Included in the work with both new and modified intersections. Installation of interconnect conduit and conductors was included in the designs. 2. City of Huntington Beach - Hr. Ralph Leyva, Traffic Engineer Plans were prepared for the installation of traffic signals at seven loea.'ons These included the m.e of Cho CalTrins Type 170 controll- er. 3. City of Thousand Oaks - Mr. John Clement, Traffic Engineer In conjunction with Robert Crommolin and Associates, Inc, a design study has been completed for an arterial signal system including 13 Intersections. Authorization has been received to prepare the plans and specifications. 4 City of Montebello - Hr Ayyad Ghobrial, City Englucer Several signal design projects have been completed for the City. The latest, in 1417, included five intersections 5 Citv of Torrance - Hr. Arc Harkey* Director of Transportation An Interconnected system of signals along Anza Avenue was redesigned to include conversion of four, two -phase intersections to eight -phase Other projects have been completed in the City for both Individual Intersections and systems. 2651 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE • SUITE 110 s FULLERTON. CALIFORNIA 92MI s (711) 671.2931 6. Plans. Specifications and Estimates have been prepared for the installation of traffic signals in the following additional titles: Baldwin Park Irvine Claremont Pasadena Carden Grove Riverside Inglewood San Dimas MOHLE, PERRY & ASSOCIATE5 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGNS AT BASELINE AND HELLNAN AVENUE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET 4* 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1p MUNICIPAL AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGNS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF BASELINE AND HELLMAN AVENUE 0 ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MARCH 28, 1979 Prepared By MOHLE, PERRY S ASSOCIATES ff 2565 East Chapman Avenue, Suite 124 i, Fullerton, California 92631 714 -738 -3471 • MOHLE, PERRY & ASSOCIATES March 28, 1979 ' Mr. Lloyd B. Hubbs y City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga • Community Development Department 9340 Baseline Street, Suite A Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Lloyd: • We appreciate the opportunity of submitting this proposal to provide the professional traffic engineering services required for the design of two traffic signal systems for the intersec- tions of Baseline and Hellman, and Archibald Avenue and Church Street, as requested by your "Request For Proposals" dated �. March 8, 1979. Our proposal is based on the subject RFP, a field review of the site, and discussions with Mr. Paul Rougeau on March 28, 1979. We are most interested in being considered for this project and believe that the attached proposal documents our experience and expertise for the proposed work and is responsive to the needs of the City for this particular type of work. ( We would sincerely appreciate the opportunity of discussing our 2 proposal in more detail with you or to answer any questions you • may have concerning our approach to the project. a i, Respectfully submitted, MOHLE, PERRY 6 ASSOCIATES R. Henry Moxie � Senior Vici Presiden, RHM:vp X0-aCah AM TRANWWAWN 04GPCM 75WEChOPn Aw Side 124. Rdwtm CA 92631 • In4)73&,W , OebH h Oc vL ax koWW and Sm Mom Carobs , 11 CITY OF RANCHO CDCAHONGA TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN PROTECT Project Overview The specific objective of this project is to prepare plans and specifications, and engineer's estimate for the installation of new traffic signal systems under the PAD program at the following intersections: S • Baseline and Bell -an Avenue • Archibald Avenue and Church Street No street work at either location is anticipated in accor- dance with the RPP, except for the possibility of handicap ramp installations as may be required. The preparation of the plans, specifications, and estimate will be finacced with non - federal money contrasted to the PAD funding for the construction. O The basic product of the engineering services will be the furnishing of 20 sets of plans and specifications for bidding purposes, as well as an engineer's estimates which will enable the City to advertise for construction bids under the PAD process. • The specific design philosophies for each location will be confirmed with a succinct project report; however, At this time it is anticipated that both installations will be fully actuated and will involve provision of left turn phasing for t one street at each location. 1 Overall Project Approach Our proposed approach to the project is to prepare the plans and specifications in accordance with the State Standard Specifications and Standard Drawings and in conformance with the design philosophies for each intersection as directed by City staff, based upon recommendations by rtPA. Specifically, based on the meeting with the City staff, the design concepts 5 for each of the two locations will be explored. This meeting ' will be followed up by the performance of turning movement counts at the Hallman and Baseline location, together with the preparation of a concept report which will provide the basic information upon which the designs will be based. Upon approval of the design concept report, 20 -scale plans for ea =h - location will be prepared. In addition to the plan sheets, a tttle sheet will also be included. As the Experience Section of our proposal further indi- cates, we have had extensive signal design experience, including FAU projects; and we, therefore, feel that the most important aspect of the project from our point of view will be to insure that the particular design details desired by the City are incorporated in the plans. To insure this coordina- tion it is proposed that an initial meeting with City staff be held to document the specific design requirements and specifi- cation basics to be utilized at each intersection. The results of this briefing will establish the framework upon which the designs will be based SCOPE OF WORK The following is a brief outline of the major elements involved in the project and our approach to each of these. The overall objective is to prepare a high quality design package 2 that will reflect the City's design requirements as well as being acceptable for FAD approval and by the Caltrans District 8 staff. TASK I: INITIAL MEETING • It is proposed that the initial, and possibly the most important, element of the proposed consultant's work is to • initiate the project with a meeting with the appropriate City staff. This meeting will specifically establish the particular design criteria or provide the latitude from the staff's point of view upon which the consultant will base recommendations for • the particular locations.- Specifically, it is intended that - the City's desired phasing for both locations, as well as desires regarding type of safety lighting, ped heads, etc., be determined at this time. At this meeting the consultant would also obtain copies of respective as -built plans, if different than those included in the APP, and other material to be used in the design process. TASK II: DESIGN CONCEPT DEPORT This task will involve the preparation of a succinct, • preliminary project report for both locations. The preparation of this report would utilize the information gained from the initial meeting together with the turning movement counts pro- vided by the City for the Archibald Avenue and Church Street • intersection. It is understood that the consultant will pro- vide manual counts at the Baseline and Hellman Avenue intersec- tion. It is proposed that turning movement counts be made during the a.m, peak, midday, and p.m. peak periods. s 3 The report will establish the design criteria and design concepts such as detector placement and other aspects of the design that are of a philosophical nature and that will form the basis df the plan preparation. The rerart will be discussed with the City staff and appropriate changes in concepts agreed upon, after which the designs will be initiated. TASK III: SIGNAL DESIGNS This task will involve the preparation of new 20 -scale O drawings for each of the two locations, together with the _ preparation of a title sheet meeting FAU requirements. The signal designs will conform to City design standards as well as current design practice for traffic signals in the Southern . California area, including the design requirements as required by the Caltrans District 8 staff. The plans will include provision of handicap ramps where needed and intersection striping. This proposal is predicated on the premise that street designs will not be involved at either location. After approval by Caltrans, 20 sets of plane and specifi- cations will be prepared for bidding purposes by the City. TASK IV: SPECIFICATIONS This task involves the preparation of 20 sots of the specifications utilizing the required FAD format a•e well as bidding forms required by the City. The basic specifications, • 4 s from a technical point of view, will be the currant Caltrans Traffic Signal Specifications. r TASK V: ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE An engineer's estivate will be prepared for the project with a breakdown: for individual work items at each location. It is understood that the specifications will be set up for a lump sum bid for each location with a total for the whole project. 10 TASK VI: BID CONSULTATION Upon receipt of bids, it is proposed that MPA assist the city in bid analysis and making a recommendation on award of contract. The services listed so far constitute the services to be provided under the proposed not- to- excacd fea as shown later in the proposal. S TASK VII: CONSTRUCTION PHASE It is proposed in accordance with the RPP that consultation during construction by the consultant be provided on a time and material basis. These services would be in addition to the not -to- exceed fee as specified in the proposal, and would be in accordance with the standard hourly rates included in the Appendix. 5 PARTICIPATION BY CITY In accordance with the RPP and discussions with the City staff, it is understood that the City will provide the follow- ings • turning movement counts for the intersection at Archibald Avenue and Church Street. • furnishing available records as may be pertinent to the project. • furnishing sample City specification format as may be available or required for the project. - • official liaison with Caltrans in coordinating the project. PROJECT MANAGUIENT Mohle, Perry a Associates utilizes the project manager concept wherein a principal of the firm will be responsihle for providing liaison with the client and coordinating all aspects of the project. The project manager will be Mr. R. Henry Mohle and he will be assisted by Mr. James Sommers, the proposed project engineer. Professional resumes included in Appendix B provide spe- cific information on the qualifications of these team members. The E :.rerience and Qualifications section of the proposal also provides additional information on key member qualifications. 6 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Our proposed team brings together the combined experience of 27 years in the signal d0aig?L and operation field by the project manager and assistant rroject manager. These managers, who will provide the supervision and expertise to lead an experienced staff , have hs1 a wide variety of traffic experience. This experience, couple..) with the traffic signal design back- ground of one of the kuy members, Mr. James Sommers, together . with the long -term ex•,)er!once of Mr. Mohle, combines to provide a balanced organizat!.on specifically suitud for this project. Appendix A provides background information about our company. Appendix B includes the personal resumes for the team - members. The following are highlights of two of the team members' experience, npeciflcally, Messrs. Mohle and Sommers, who will direct the project, and indicate an overview of their signal design and operational experience. R. HENRY MOHLE - PROJECT MANAGER -- Mr. Mohle's 18 years of signal experience has involved pretimed, semiactuated, fully - actuated volume density signal design and operations. His 10 years of experience with the City of Santa Ana provided a practical perspective of traffic signal operations from the point of view of the person responsible for signal timing. This experience involved systems on Main Street, 17tu Street, Flower Etreet, and Bristol Street, as well as tha °_esign of more than 50 intersection systems. As a consultant, Mr. Mohle has been involved in the design of many computerized traffic control systems including the r Cities of Buena Park, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, and Pomona. This experience is in addition to the extensive signal 7 evaluation and design experience gained from project manager or staff engineer responsibilities for the following TOPICS Area - wide Studies: in addition to signal system designs under the TOPICS program in many of these cities, he has been responsible for signal designs for: Fountain Vxlloy San Diego Montebello Vista Newport Beach Yorba Linda Placentia County of Orange JAMES J. SOMMERS - TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN SPECIALIST Mr. Sommers has over 10 years of experience in the field of traffic engineering and transportation planning. This exper- ience has been at different degrees of responsibility, varying from simple data collection to analysis and professional con - siC rations. During the TOPICS period, Mr. Sommers was involved with more than 30 separate areowide studies. This involvement included accident analyses, speed and delay studies, capacity analyses, and the evaluation of traffic signals and traffic signal systems. 8 Chino Orange Claremont Pomona Corona Rialto Fontana San Clemente ' Fullerton Santa Ana Garden Grove Seal Beach s Huntington Beach Stanton 3, Ontario Upland in addition to signal system designs under the TOPICS program in many of these cities, he has been responsible for signal designs for: Fountain Vxlloy San Diego Montebello Vista Newport Beach Yorba Linda Placentia County of Orange JAMES J. SOMMERS - TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN SPECIALIST Mr. Sommers has over 10 years of experience in the field of traffic engineering and transportation planning. This exper- ience has been at different degrees of responsibility, varying from simple data collection to analysis and professional con - siC rations. During the TOPICS period, Mr. Sommers was involved with more than 30 separate areowide studies. This involvement included accident analyses, speed and delay studies, capacity analyses, and the evaluation of traffic signals and traffic signal systems. 8 s Later during the Federal Highway Safety programs, Mr. Sommers was involved in several traffic signal inventory projects. This included the evaluation of controller equipment, operation of equipment and the signal and safety lighting equipment. Conclusions involved recommendations for improve- ment of the equipment or its operation. Traffic signal and traffic control systems design back- ground includes the design of i:, excess of 200 separate inter- ' sections for approximately 30 agencies, all within the State of California. Many of these projects required the implemen- tation of a system to coordinate the separate intersections. The systems implemented varied from a simple telephone relay to sophisticated central computer controlled systems. More specifically, projects concerning traffic control systems which utilized computer control such as the digital central master systems include the following cities: Buena Park, Garden Grove, Pomona, and Stockton. Ir0tvidual int :sec- tions, in most cases, were designed with future interconnect in mind. There were also projects for the County of Orange which were design specifically for interfacing with a computer. Mr. Sommers' experience within the traffic engineering field, with the exception of traffic control devices, is highly diversified rather than being concentrated. Thus, he is capable of providing a good, practical background to the traffic engi- neering functions of MPA. More Recent Traffic Signal Experience Messrs. Mohle and Sommers are currently or have recently completed directing the work on traffic signal design and /or modification projects for the following agencies: W s me Our firm also provides traffic engineering services for the City of Lakewood on a continuing basis. Signal System Timing - Recent Experience ' The following are recent arterial signal timing projects for which we have been responsible: City of Cypress Valley View Avenue - PASSER II and TRANSYT 6 City of Riverside Tyler Street - PASSER II Magnolia Avenue - TRANSYT 6 • City of Reno Rietzke Lane - PASSER II City of Newport Beach Newport Boulevard - PASSER II 10 City of Stockton - 2S intersections in downtown area City of Riverside - 50 intersection computer system, FAU project (onstreet masters) City of Inglewood - 30 intersection modernizations, FAU project City of Upland - 13 intersection computer system, FAU project City of San Diego - FAU project City of Banning �. City of Santa Ana City of Newport Beach City of Visalia City of Corona County of Orange - me Our firm also provides traffic engineering services for the City of Lakewood on a continuing basis. Signal System Timing - Recent Experience ' The following are recent arterial signal timing projects for which we have been responsible: City of Cypress Valley View Avenue - PASSER II and TRANSYT 6 City of Riverside Tyler Street - PASSER II Magnolia Avenue - TRANSYT 6 • City of Reno Rietzke Lane - PASSER II City of Newport Beach Newport Boulevard - PASSER II 10 City of Banning Ramsey Streat - PASSER II City of Stockton Pacific Avenue - PASSER II County of Orange Marguerite Parkway - PASSER II • City of Upland Euclid Avenue - TRANSYT 6 Summary • It is our conviction that the proposed project team pro- vides the necessary background and expertise to design the signals in accordancaa with City desires and an acceptable • high level of professional practice, based on long -term, extensive experience in dealing with signal improvement. • PROJECT SCHEDULE We are prepared to begin work on the project upon notifi- 11 " cation from the City to proceed. We are, likewise, prepared • from a staff point of view to be able to submit plans to Caltrans for their initial review within one month from the notice to proceed. This is predicated upon the assumption that there will be speedy plan review by the City, as well as timely information provided by the Edison Company for service C locations. 11 " PROPOSED FEE IE is proposed that the services as required by the RFP and proposed in the Scope of Work be paid for on a time and material basis with a not -to- exceed fee of $3,400. It is understood that the cost for printing the 20 sets of plans and specifications will be billed on the basis of actual cost. It is also understood that services to be provided during the construction phase will he on an hourly basis in accordance with the standard hourly raLea as included in the Appendix. 12 Y • :7 • APPENDIX A THE COMPANY n w ` THE COMPANY MOHLE, PERRY i ASSOCIATES is an orcanization of pro- fessional engineers, planners, and technicians dedicated to providing the client with a responsive, quality service. The paramount goal of the firm is to understand the needs of the client and translate those needs into a product of excellence. The company is more than its prin$ipals. it is the reflection of the combined effort, experience, and enthusiasm of all its members. Each person of the firm has a vital role through his perticipation by providing the building blocks UP our success. Virtually all the members of the firm have at one time worked for governmental agencies. This background provides the firm with :n overview of the intricacies of government. This sensitivity and experience afford us the unique position of thinking and reacting to the client's needs by functioning as an extension of the existing staff. MOHLY., PERRY a ASSOCIATES believes the beat method of • prodding the client with a comprehensive program of project development is to assign its most responsive member as client representative. This person will possess the exper- ience and sensitivity to tho needs of the client. He will b also be the principal point of communication and coordina- tion. • 1 M 6 APPENDIX B RESUMES 0 n a e R. HENRY MOHLE, P.E. r Principal I EDUCATION: Master of Engineering in Transportation University of California, 1956 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering University of California, 1953 PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIOMSs American Society of Civil Engineers American Public Works Association Institute of Transportation Engineers Highway Research Board Member of the Board of Directors of ITE (1972 -1974) Or.Aga County Branch - ASCE (Past President) Western Section - ITE (Past President) Orange County Traffic Engineering Council (Past Chairman) PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Registered Professional Enqineer in California and Arizona Registered Traffic Engineer in California EXPERIENCEt O Mr. Mohle and Mr. Perry founded MOHLE, PERRY L ASSOCIATES in 1976 for the purpose of providing comprehensive pro- fessional services to governmental agencies. Prior to this, from 1970 to 1976, he was a principal of other ` municipal consulting firms where ha specialized in trans- portation and traffic engineering. Earlier, Mr. Mohle was the Traffic Engineer and Assistant Director of Public Works for the City of Santa Ana from 1960 to 1970. His experience also includes four years with the California Division of Highways, one and one -half years as an Airport Engineer ' with the Federal Aviation Agency, and instructor in traffic f and transportation engineering at UC Irvine. Y R. HENRY MOHLE - Continued m Mr. Mohle, while with the City of Santa Ana, was a key staff member involved in the planning, design, construction and operation of more than S14 million of arterial streets and $1 million of traffic signal systems. As a consultant, his transportation and traffic engineering projects included • TOPICS area -wide studies, O.T.S. studies, traffic sfgi.rl designs, street lighting designs, and traffic planning in more than 30 Southern California cities, in addition to the projects with the orange County Airport and Orange County Transit District. Mr. Mohle has been responsible for park- ing studies for Newport Beach, traffic- control device inventory for Buena Park, traffic analysis for a regional shopping center in National City, and six miles of bicycle ways for the City of Huntington Beach. He was the project manager for the OCTD's first Park - and -Ride facility (an PAU project) in Fullerton and the County -wide study for the . Perk - and -Ride /Freeway Bus- System. He was also project manager on the 'Street Master Plan' study for the City of Beverly Hills. • • a JAMES J. SOMMERS, Associate ictiunl Traffic Signal Designer/ Transportation Engineer EDUCATION: Y Bachelor of Arta degree in Geography with minor work in Urban and Transportation Planning, California State University, Fullerton PROFESSIONAL ASSOCfATIONS: Institute of Transportation Engineers Orange County Traffic Engineers Council EXPERIENCE: Mr. Somm3ra joined HOHLE, PERRY 6 ASSOCIATES in December 1976 and brought with him 12 years of experience in traffic operations engineering from signal design to special traffic studies. From 1963 to 19700 he was on the traffic engineering staff for the City of Santa Ana where he designed all types of traffic signals and performed various traffic circulation studies. From 1970 to 1973, he was a staff member of a private con - sultent handling TOPICS program projects for over 20 public agencies. During this period he designed over 200 traffic aignals for various public agencies. These signal projects ranged from simple pre -tirwd isolated intersections to com- plex computer - oriented systems. Later, from 1973 to 1976, Mr. Sommers worked for two pri- vate consultants providing services exclusively to public agencies. While there he handled various transportation project assignments including the Orange County Freeway Bus System and the Park- and -Ride study. Fie also handled various other municipal engineering assignments including compre- hensive plan checking for numerous cities. a • APPENDIX C • STANDARD HOURLY RATES • a • • I MOHLE, PERRY 8 ASSOCIATES SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1979 Principal Associate Transportation Engineer Civil Engineer Architectural Planner Landscape Planner Designer Inspector Senior Draftsman Assistant Transportation Engineer Assistant Civil Engineer Assistant Architectural Planner Assistant Landscape Planner Assistant Draftsman Clerical Engineering Technician 2 -Man Survey Party 3 -Man Survey Party Mileage Rate: MID TRNWOMATOFI e4a4m =ECtCP mAve SWe 124, F/et= CA 92671 • M4) 736,W Often h Orange, Im 4,2" a Sm DWW CwOw L D. King 517 N. Eutlid Awnue Onuflo, Califomla 91762 (7141 9885482 ENGINE ERS/ARCHITECTS/PLANN ERS March 23, 1979 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Attention Mr Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer Re: Request for Proposal Dear Mr. Hubbs: In response to the City's Request for Proposal dated March S. 1979, we are pleased to submit this proposal for providing professlona services for the Baseline Street Improvements from east of Vineyard Avenue to Hellman Avenue, and from Archibald Avenue to west of Hermosa Avenue. L 0 KING utilizes the Project Director /Project Manager team concept. Mr. 8111 Mann, Manager of the Ontario Branch Office of L. D. KING, will serve as Project Directc: and will maintain overall responsibility for the project. The Proj ^.ct Manager for the street improvement project will be Mr, Douglas Mays, and the Project Engineer will be Mr Barrye Hanson Both individuals have extensive experience in street improvement projects and familiar with procedures and reviews inherent in FAU Projects L. D KING believes in close coordination with clients and extensive project control and management. During the course of the preliminary investigation and design, L. D. KING personnel will confer frequently with the City staff in order to maintain close corrminications in the completion of the project The Project Manager, along with the Project Director, will be responsible for necessary close coordination and commini cats on. Upon selection, L D KING will begin work immediately after receipt of the Notice to Proceed and will complete the project• in a timely manner. Olfkn In: O.NTAR10, PLACENTIA,nd NEWPORT BEACH March 23, 1979 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page two We appreciate the opportunity to submit this propasal and look forward to our continuing good working relationship and working with the City of Ontario on these projects. Respectfully submitted, �t l�MAN P. E. E. Ontario Branch Manager BCM:sw M)MG PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is located on Baseline Street from east of Vineyard Avenue to Hellman Avenue, and from Archibald Avenue to west of Hermosa Avenue The following section descriptions and preliminary evaluations are based on several field reviews of the project, discussions with City Staff, and information included in the Request for Proposals. - The section between Station 22+50 and Station 36 +20 on the left may require an overlay and possibly some local reconstruction of existing pavement for the interim condition with complete curb design for the ultimate street plan, including necessary driveway and intersection details - The section between Station 22 +50 and Beryl Avenu, on the right will be designed and ultimate improvements constructed by the developers of the adjacent property The property is being developed at this time - The section between Beryl Avenue and 175 feet west of Lion Street on the right will require widening in conjunction with an overlay and possibly some local reconstruction of the existing pavement for the interim condition A complete design of the ultimate street, inclu- ding driveway and intersection details, will be necessary. - The section from 175 feet west of Lion Street to Lion Street on the right has existing curb at 32 feet right of centerline This section will possibly require an overlay for the interim condition Future widening to 36 feet will require ultimate street plans for curb and intersection. - The section between Lion Street and Station 36 +20 on the right has already been widened and improved to the ultimate 36 foot width and it is anticipated that an overlay with some possible local pavement reconstruction would be required. - The section between Archibald Avenue to 650 feet east on the left will require approximately 13 feet of widening with an overlay avd possibly some local construction of existing pavement for the interim condition Full street improvement plans including the northeast quadrant of the intersection at Archibald Avenue will be necessary - From 650 feet east of Archibald Avenue to Teak Way on the left has already been improved to the ultimate 36 foot width and it appears that an overlay with some local reconstruction of existing pavement may be necessary. -1- UKIRS - The section from Teak way to Station 92 +50 on the left may require an overlay with local reconstruction of the existing pavement where necessary for the interim condition. Because of the existing wall along the northerly edge of pavement, interim widening would be very costly Full street improvement plans will be necessary for this sectio.i, including the northeast quadrant of the Teak Hay inter- section - the scctinn � cween Archibald Avenue to 850 feet east on the right will be improved to the ultimate street width along with the develop - a.ent of the adjacent prtperty. No design work is anticipated in this section The development of the adjacent property is underway at the present time - The section fron 850 feet east of Archibald Avenue to Station 92 +50 on the right has already been improved to the ultimate street width of 36 fee. with curb,gutter and sidewalk and it is anticipated that, at most, overlay and local 'reconstruction of existing pavement may be necessary SCOPE OF WORK Ultimate widening is considered to be Ind foot right-of-way with a 72 foot roadway section and it is assumed that sections with existing curb less than 36 feet from centerline will also require ultimate curb design PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1 Perf,irm all necessary field surveys within 100 foot ultimate right -of -way to establish ultimate street cross - sections, street and curb profile grades within the project limits 2 Perform necessary corings and soils tests necessary to satisfy FHWA and Caltrans' requirements for structural section design. 3. Prepare a report recommending overlay thickness, structural sec- tion design and pavement removal limits with pr titular emphasis on the existing concrete sections and alternative treatments of pavement. Traffic indexes and data will be provided by the City. 4. Assist City in obtaining Caltrans' approval of report prepared under item No. 3 above 5. Research and plot existing right -of -way limits. -2- r, Eyr. 7�0 k=� r� 6 Determine scope of widening which can be constructed wfthim existing right- of-way which wiTT fit uTtimate design parameters. 7 Research and plot existing utilities. B. Review preliminary design parameters, structuraT sectiom desfgm and cost estimates with the City ani coordinate with CaTtrans. The existing information developed from Item Nis, P, 4 and 6 wfbT be drafted on plan and profile miylar at 40 scale with My Standard Block. Redline prints of these sheets wftT then be used to deveTop) Item No 6 and cost estimates for Item No. A Item No. 2 includes dt least eight (8) pavement cares, depth not to exceed 2 feet, 8 sand equivalents and 4 R- Values; at varfaus Tocatfois which are considered to represent the pavement area being evaluated. The cost to the City for additional testing, ff required by an - approving agency, will be at the invoice cost to the Engineer. The not to exceed maximum budget for the PreTfmfnary Design Phase is $12,000, with regular progress LiTTings at the hourly rates fn- eluded herein. This includes $1,500 for the soils and pavement evaluation report, and $2,500 for design surveys- 8 FINAL DESIGN 1. Upon approval of preliminary, design concept, prepare final desfgm plans showing the ultimate street design for WT wfdenfng, fm- eluding necessary drive approach and intersection mcdtffcatians, curb grades, and required typical sections. 2. Utilizing ultimate street plan design, overlay the tnterian fnr provement design to include widening withfa testing rfght -af -way, overlay and necessary construction. 3. Prepare contract documents, specifications and quantfty estimates in conformance with City. Caltrans and EN1fA guideTfnes for faterfrm project construction. 4. Submit design plans and cross - sections to City and Ca ➢trans tar plan check and review. 5 Make necessary plan revisions to meet City and CaTtrans' regafre- ments and approval. 6. Prepare 20 sets of finished design plans, speciffcatf= and engineer's estimates. -3- ... - r i; 7. Upon receipt of bids, consultant shall analyze bids and make recomnendecion on award of contract. The orlgirdl 40 scale plan and profile mylar sheets developed for the Preliminary Design Phase will be used to develop the Final Design Plans for the ultimate street design (Item No. 1). The interim improvement design, Item No. 2, will be superimposed on the original plan and profile sheets developed for Item No. 1. The not to exceed maximum budget for the Final Design Phase is $6,200 with regular progress billings at the hourly rates included herein. : does not include an estimated $300 for printing charges that wili billed at invoice cost. C. CDNSTNUCTIuN 1. The consultant shall "provide all required construction surveying-. 2. The consultant shall be available for consultation during con- struction on any needed plan revisions as requested by the City. 3. The consultant shall make recommendation on contract change orders as requested by the City. 4. Prepare project as -built plans. Because the final scope of the interim construction requirements are unknown at this timr, it is recommended the not to exceed budget for providing Construction Surveying be negotiated with the City upon completion of the Final Design Phase. A more realistic survey cost can be determined at that time. The Construction Survey cost would then be based on the rate schedule included herein 'herefore,estimated for the purpose of this proposal,the not to ex- ceed maximum budget for providing Construction Surveying based on 16 hours of a 3 -man crew is $1,440, with regular progress billings at the hourly rates included herein. Additional construction sur- veying beyond the 16 hours estimated and re- establishment of center- line morumentation and ties will be at the hourly rates included herein. Payment for providing consultation during construction, making recom- mendations on contract change orders, and preparing as -built plans, Item Nos. 2, 3 and 4, will be at the hourly rates included herein -4- BOOM PROJECT SCHEDULE A. PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1. Complete field survey, coring and soils testing by the end of Week 1. 2. Complete utility and right -of -way research by the end of Week 2. 3. Complete drafting of Item Nos, 1 and 2 above on 40 scale plan and profile sheets by the end of Week 3. 4 Complete drafting Item No. 1 on base cross - section sheets by the end of Week 4. 5 Determine scope of widening and pavement reconstruction within existing right -of -way and review with City by the end of Week 5. - 6 Complete pavement evaluation report and review preliminary design parameters, structural section and cost estimates with City and Caltrans by the end of Week 6. Total time estimated for the Preliminary Design - 6 Weeks. B FINAL DESIGN 1 After approval of Preliminary Design concept, complete ultimate street improvement plans by the end of Week 3. 2 Complete interim improvement plan design and cross - sections by the end of Week 5. 3 Complete draft contract documents, specifications and quantity estimates by the end of Week 6. 4 Preliminary review of Item No.s 1, 2 and 3 by the City and Cal - trans. 5 Complete revisions resulting from preliminary review and submit final plans, specifications and estimate to City - 2 Weeks. Total time estimated for Final Design - 8 Weeks. Total time frame for the design phases is estimated to be 14 Weeks, ex- cluding review time by City, Caltrans and FHWA. -5- QUALIFICATIONS L. D. KING has over 13 years of consulting experience in Southern Cali- fornia Both L. Dale King, President, and Carl Freeman, Senior Vice President, were Public Works Directors and City Engineers prior to the formation of the firm. In the public works area, the firm has built a strong professional re- lationship with City, County and State Officials in the highway, flood control, traffic, water and wastewater areas. Our public works project areas include traffic and signalization studies, highway and grade sepa- ration designs, flood control studies and designs, water works feasibility studies and design, pump station design, parking studies and sanitary sewer studies and designs. In the above public works areas, examples of clients include: Cities of Chino, Claremont, Corona, Montclair, Ontario, Redlands, Riverside, South Gate, Upland and Walnut; the San Bernardino County Flood Control District; - the County of San Bernardino; the Chino Basin Water Conservation District; the Monte Vista County Water District; and the San Bernardino County Environmental Improvement Agency. Representing L D. KING to the City of Rancho Cucnmonga will be Mr. Bill Mann. Mr. Mann has extensive experience in management of public works projects on both the private and public sector L D KING personnel have many years of experience in the design, con- struction, and contract administration of street and road improvements Mr. Douglas Mays has acted as Project Manager for many street improvement projects in the Cities of Ontario, Montclair, Upland and the Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside. He is presently Project Manager for a grade separation project in San Marcos and street improvement projects for the Cities of Ontario and Upland. L D. KING and its staff have completed project; similar to the proposed project. The following is a brief list of selected projects that are now In process or that have been recently completed for your review: MOUNTAIN AVENUE FAU PROJECT, City of Upland. Design street improve- ments and traffic signal system controlled cy a master computer system located at City Hall. CENTRAL AVENUE FAU PROJECT, City of Montclair Design plans for street improvements, intersection drainage systems, and a coordinated traffic signal system. Coordination required with utility companies, Monte Vista County Water District, Caltrans, and the Federal Highway Administration. -6- MG BEAR VALLEY CUTOFF ROAD, Victorville area, San Bernardino County Design for railroad grade separation of A T.S.F.R.R.* SILICON AVENUE, City of Montclair. Design plans and construction administration services for street improvement. QUARRY STREET, City of Montclair. Design plans and construction administration services for street improvement. GUASTI ROAD, City of Ontario Design plans and construction ad- ministration se:vices for full street improvements SAN TIMOTEO CANYON ROAD BRIDGE, City of Redlands. Design and provide resident engineering and inspection services.* E16 .w STREET UNDERPASS, City of Banning. Design and provide resi- dent engineering and inspection for railroad grade separation at Southern Pacific Transportation Company and Caltrans.* - DATE PALM DRIVE BRIDGE, Cathedral City, Riverside County. Design complete for bridge crossing of Whitewater River.* 7TH STREET, City of Upland Design in progress for street widening and right -of -way acquisition "D" STREET, pity of Ontario Design in progress for existing pave- ment reconstruction. * Association with DeLeuw, Cather and Company 5L' i;=b w Mesumes L, Dale [ding, P.E. Dale King is President and Chairman of the Board of Directors of L. D. KING. He was a founding partner in the firm of ring R King in 1965 which led to the formation in 1970 of L D. KING. Mr. King's managemeant leadership and depth of professional experience have guided the firm in its growth and development of new areas of professional service to clients. Kr. King has served as project manager for numerous railroad grade separation and bridge projects from the preliminary planning and study phases through design and construction management. He has directed planning and design of sdnitary sewer and water line facilities; preparation of sewer master plans; storm drainage system design; traffic stud'es; and street and traffic signal system design Prior to entering private practice, Mr. King was City Engineer and Director of Public Works for the City of Montclair with responsibility for several City departments He initiated, planned, and designed numerous public works projects and coor- dinated design and construction of a new Civic (enter, several city parks, and a citywide sewer collection system. His initial professional experience was as Highway Engineer, Resident Engineer, and District Representative on bridge and highway design and construction with the California Division of Highways Registered Civil Engineer in the States of California - No. 12790 and Nevada - No. 3282 Member: American Public Works Association National Society of Professional Engineers San Bernardino - Riverside Counties City E:.gireers' Association - President, 1964 California Chairman - Professional Engineers in Private Practice, 1975 -77 Western Regional Vice Chairman - NSPE /PEPP 1978 -79 Carl J. Freeman, PE. Carl Freeman is Senior Vice President and a member of the Board of Directors of L. 0. KING. He has been a principal in the firm since 1970. Hr. Freeman has directed the expanding services of L D. KIG in all phases of Public Works Programs. Mr. Freeman has been Project Manager for many varied water, sewerage, traffic, and other types of public works projects. He has prepared sewerage management project reports, water re,,-jire- ments studies, environmental im?act reports, street master plans and regional sewerage studies. He nas been responsible for design and administration of a ground.+ater recharge program and directed projects for municipal client. in preparation of project descrip.. tions, environmental assessments, and successful EDA grant 3ppii- cations for the Public Works employment Act of 1976. Mr. Freeman has also been Project Manager for design plans, estimates, speci- ficatiors, and construction supervision of numerous traffic signal and street improvement projects. Prior to his association with L. D. KING, Carl Freeman was City Engineer and Director of Public Works for the City of Montclair He administered planning and construction of a $1.4 million assessment district that purchased right o' way, relocated or constructed utilities, streets, sewers, and traffic signals for a major regional shopping center. lir Freeman's first professional experience was with the Los Angeles County Flood Control District directing qujlity, control and inspection; operations of Flood Control District facilities. California Professional Engineer - Civil Ito. 16434 California Professional Engineer - Traffic Ito. 856 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, north Dakota State University, 1960 Member- American Public Works Association American Water Vorks Association American Society of Civil Engineers California Water Pollution Control Association San Bernardi no-Hi versi de Counties City engineers Association Bell C. Mann, P.E. As flan ! er of the Ontario Branch Office, Mr. Mann brings more than 20 years o en; neer ng, construct an, an administration experience to L D. KING He has over 10 years of experience with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District as Givision'Chief in the capacity of Engineering, Land Development, Construction and Contract Administration, and Federal Projects This included two years as Assistant Flood Control Engineer in charge of the Land Development, Water Resources and Laboratory Group Mr Mann has directed many projects and studies in coordination with various agencies, including the U S. Corps of Engineers, U. S Geological Survey, Soil Conservation Service, California State Department of Water Resources, and various city, county, and state agencies During this period major emphasis was in water conservation, flood plain studios, storm drain design, and land development review lie also has had three years of private engineering experience -including a partnership in a consulting engineering firm involved in land development, recreation park design, water and sewage systems, building design, street and highways, and r> bility studies. During this perion the firm. served as Engineers for se = i1 water districts and water companies His initial Professional experience was with the California Division of Highways for eight years in the fields of highway and street planning, design, and construction California Registered Civil Engineer - No. 14326 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, San Diego State University Vaster of Public Administration, University of California, Riverside Member: American Society of Civil Engineers - (Past President, San Bernardino - Riverside Counties Branch, 1973 - vice President, Los Angeles Section, 1977) Am.,erican Public Works Association National Society of Professional Engineers American Water Works Association Fellow, Institute for Advance.-nit of Engineers Chi Episilon Fraternity i' it L. n Douglas H. Mays, , P.E. Douglas H. Mays is a Pro ect Mana er for L. D KING with responsibilities in t e Pub c or s area, specializing in feasibility studies, design and construction contract admin- istration services for streets, highways, bridge and railroad grade separations projects. As Project Manager for L D. KING, Mr Mays was responsible for design,speciflcations, and contract administration for several railroad grade separation projects, both for the County of San Bernardino and City of San Marcos and various street improvement projects Mr Hays was responsible for the Montclair storm drain feasibil- ity study prepared for the County of San Bernardino. He was Project Engineer responsible for the preparation of plans and specifications for water well redevelopment and administra- tion of several waterline projects. Prior •o Joining L. 0 KING, Mr. Pays was a Senior Field Construction Engineer for Fluor Engineers and „)nstructors, Inc. He was responsible for providing engineering and technical sup- port for the construction of a pump station on the Trans Alaskan O il Pipelineandmaintenanceof hestation s temporary construc- tion camp facilities Mr worked 12 numerousimajorafr freeway con- struction rans- re related highwaycfacilities, for California Professional Engineer - Civil No. 21062 Bachelor of Science Engineering, Purdue University, 1964 Member- San Bernardino - Riverside Counties City Engineers Association American Society of Civil Engineers BARRYE R. HANSON. P E Barrye Hanson is a Project Engineer for L D KING with responsibilities in the public works and land development areas As a Project Engineer for L D KING, Mr, Hanson has prepared development plans for the Mack Truck Sales Facility in the City of Ontario, site ex- pansion plans for the Autohaus (Mercedes Benz and Ronda Dealership) in the City of tontclair, contributed to drainage and flood reports for pro- posed developments within the City of Rancho Cucamong+, performed plan check services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Montclair, and is presently developing various alternate designs 'or the widening of 7th Street in the City of Upland. Mr Hanson came to L 0. KING from the City of Bakersfield, Engineering Department, where he spent three years gaining a wide variety of experience. His initial assignment with the City was to administrate the day to day operation of the Land Subdivision function of the Public Works Department His duties included the establishment of conditions for the approval of tentative subdivision maps, the review of final maps, the review of im- provement plans, and the assisting of the public and developers with City Engineering related questions. His final assignment with the City was as a Design Engineer, where he prepared plans and specifications for City street, sanitary sewer, storm drain, and site development projects Mr Hanson went to the City of Bakersfield after spending seven years with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). His first assign- ment with Caltrans was in the Freeway Design Section, where he prepared plans and specifications for freeway projects. Secondly, he participated in the Caltrans' rotatorial program where he received trairing in freeway bridge construction, constriction surveying, highway maintenance operations, and program and budget administration. His last assignment was in the Adva,.ced Planning Section, where he wrote project reports in which various project alternatives were evaluated California Registered Civil Engineer, Ito. 25400 Associate of Science Degree in Civil Engireering Imperial Valley Junior College, 1964 Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration Bakersfield State College, 1978 ruspresenzatiee Clients SPECIAL DISTRICTS CITIES Alpine Water Users Association Adelanto Chino Basin Water Conservation Banning District Beaumont Monte Vista County Water District Claremont San Bernardino Valley Municipal Chino Water District Corona South Mesa Water Company Fontana Victorville Parks b Recreatio•i La Verne District Los Angeles Wrightwood County Service Area 56 Montclair Yucca Valley Parks 6 Recreation Norco District Ontario Redlands Rialto SCHOOLS Riverside San Bernardino Loma Linda University San Marcos Ontario - Montclair School Oist�ict South Gate Redlands Unified School District Upland Rim of the World Unified School Victorville District San Bernardino City School District COUNTIES Temple City School District University of Redlands Orange Yucaipa High School Distr,-t Riverside San Bernardino SANBAG PLANNING AND LAND DE7ELOPMENT Acacia Construction Company American Airlines American Savings L Loan Assoc. Anden Corporation Ernest Auerbach Company 14. J Brock & Sons Diamond Bar Development Corp. Fredricks Development Corp. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc Inland Christian Home, Inc. The Irvine Company Kaiser Foundation Hospitals Lewis Homes, Inc. Mark III Homes, Inc. Motel 6 Presley of Southern California St. Mary Desert Valley Hosp. San Antonio Community Hosp. Santa Barbara Savings Santa Fe Frd. Savings S Loan Security Pacific Nat. Bank Union Oil Company of Calif. Vanguard Builders Wadsworth Publishing Company West`ield Development Company Qn m L D. KING Engineers /Architects /Planners HOURLY CHARGE RATES August 1, 1978 Principal Engineer /Project Manager Project Engineer /Planner 3esigner /Draftsman /Landscape P.rchitcct Draftsmn,'Technician 2 -1/in Survey Party 3 -Mat, Survey Party $42.00 per hour $35.00 per hour 528.00 per hour $24 00 per hour S72 00 par hour-- $88.00 per hour Sir. D.Doyd 6W7os 0* En sneer CITy of IMnOw Cucamonga IRM Seseldm:. Suite A Aardm Cucamonga, California Deer Mn. Diuidrs: We cmzpart My submit this proposal in -esponse to your req-mst for propomIs dated March 5, 1979, regarding consulting engineering snW, res fctr the Baseline Street overlay, reconstruction. and minor wddeoing as shown mn the City's exhibi• . This proposal by C G Enginaaring :has teen developed to Inc •'• a Aetailed format for the ServIres. a proposed schedule. our fet isic services as WidDdned, and the project team with thi cations. C C Emglnuar: vg's project team :has the expertise to provide the city sf Mancha Gucamon9a with Mete and comprehensive project plans f w middi.•ru and can aid in the necessary reviews while requiring a mdrr.'msn sf the City's administrative and engineering staff's comnlsnent arf time, thereby .reducing overall project costs to the Cbty. Very truly yours. Hoel L. Christensen president BASELINE STREET OVERLAY, RECONSTRUCTION AND MINOR WIDENING The City of Rancho Cucamonga proposes to construct Improvements along Baseline Street for two locations: 1) between west of Garnet Street and Montava Avenue near Hellman Avenue, and 2) between Archibald Avenue and approximately 150 feet easterly of Cambridge Street. Baseline Street is an FAU Route and will utilize FAU funding for the construction C G Engineering has assembled a highly qualified project team to complete the required services. Joining C G to make up the project team will be C.H J Materials Laboratory, Inc to complete the soils and pavement _ analysis qualifications for C G Engineering and C.H.J. Materials Laboratory, Inc accompany this proposal. The approach to the project will be to prepare the plans utilizing field topo plotted on igylar incorporating the City's standard plan blank for the areas of work Identification of existing features for use in the design phase will ba included and will aid the contractor during construction. Upon completing the base plans and obatining any additional required field topo and elevations for tie -in paving, a field revie,i of the project work areas would be done to identify utilities which may be affected, driveways and other pertinent features. Then the soils and pavement testing would be undertaken with copies of the base plans furnished to C.H.J. The plans and specifications would then be completed all in accordance with the services outlined in this proposal. A proposed schedule is included. SCOPE OF SERVICES meetings with City to rpview project schedule, standards, and work affecting other agencies. Establish centerline control and stationing Obtain cross sections and pavement tie -in data to allow establishing ultimate street section and curb profile grades -2- c) Obtain identification of all surface utilities and °acuities d Establish vertical control e Topo intersections each way minimum 200 feet to allow design of ultimate curb returns where necessary 3. Prepare base plan sheets incorporating topography on mylar and standard City title block 4 C.M.J Materials Laboratory, Inc will obtain soils and pavement tests and prepare report as follows: a) Coring of existing pavements will be done at approximately 250't intervals Field observation of thickness of pavement and /or aggregate - c) Field observation of surface conditions of existing pavements d) Obtain samples of subgrade materials for sie•,e analysis, sand equivalent, and "Ru value analysis e) Laboratory evaluations: 1) Observe and evaluate core samples 2 Perfonv sieve analysis, sand equivalents, and "R' value tests on samples f) Engineering evaluations: B 1 Perform unit evaluation based upon lab tests 2 Compute gravel equivalents based upon T.I.'s provided by City 3) Determine gravel equivalents of existing sections 4) Evaluate alternative methods of pavement renovation 5) Compute overlay and structural section re quirements 6) Provide recommendations regarding pavement removals and repairs in heavily distressed areas g) Prepare report and submit to City and CAURAIIs for review and approval 5. Research and plot existing right -of -way 6. Plot existing utilities on base plans B -3- 7. Prepare preliminary design layout showing ultimate street design Superimpose proposed scope of overlay, pavement removals, and widening for reconstruction within existing right of way. 8. Prepare preliminary estimates of cost for proposed overlay, reconstruction and minor widening 9. Submit preliminary design data to City for review. Attend meetings and make presentations as may be necessary for approvals Final Design 1 Prepare detailed design plans for ultimate street section including consideration of drive approaches, drainage, and street intersection designs in accordance with City Standards. Z. Prepare detailed construction drawings for overlay, reconstruction, and minor widening in accordance with City Standards 3. Submit plans to affected utilities and complete arrangements for grade adjustments of facilities as may be required 4 Prepare contrect documents and special provisions based on the following format: Contract documents ( "Boiler Plate ") to he in accordance with approved City format incorporating references to State and Federal guidelines Special Provisions portion to utilize State Standard Special Provisions for items of work involved. Utilization of CALTRANS format is recommended to aid in obtaining approvals and for coordination with their processes. 5. Prepare quantity and cost estimates. 6 Submit plans, specifications and estimates together with backup data to City for checking and review by City and CALTRANS -4- 7. Complete revisions and obtain final approvals. 8. Provide 20 sets of plans, specifications and estimates for City's use in bidding. 9. Assist City in obtain'nq yids and analyzing for recommendation of .n" d of contract. C Construction 1 Provide all required construction staking 2. Provide consultation regarding plan interpretation or need plan revisions. 2 Make recommendation on contract change orders. 4. Prepare project "As Built" plans utilizing project inspector's "As Built" information. Provide City with all field survey data, reports, cross sections, design data and other pertinent materials and documents received or prepared by the project team. TIME OF COMPLETION The project team will complete the services outlined as follows: A. Preliminary Design - 60 Days B. Final Design - 45 Days C Construction* - 8 Days -5- FEES FOR SERVICES For the services outlined above, C G Engineering will be reimbursed in accordance with the attached hourly rate schedules. (Note: C H.J Materials Laboratory, Inc. rate schedule is attached and billings from C G will include their charges.) For project budget purposes and as required in the request for proposal, we provide the following not to exceed maximums for each phase of work: A. Preliminary Design - $11,930 B Final Design - 6,100 C. Construction - 2.720 $20,750 _ The construction phase of the project 1s extremely difficult to quantify for services until plans have been completed, there ore, we have allowed four days survey time and four days for a Prcject Manager and/or a Soils Engineer to be involved through the length of the contract. Upon plans being completed, we would be pleased to provide a more definitive estimate -6- QUALIFICATIONS C G Engineering (C G) specializes in providing consulting services to local governmental agencies in the areas of civil engineering and traffic engineering. Accordingly, the work which we produce is always consistent with the client agency's standards, and is very thorough and clear. Our reputation has been built, in part, on our timely completion of contractual obligations and our ability to meet our client's scheduling needs We do not make commitments we can't keep. If we present a time frame for completion of a project, we meet it, providing events beyond our control do not occur, and we make every effort to keep such events to the absolute minimum. C G specializes in putting together bidding packages which are clear and complete so the contractor knows precisely what he is bidding on _ and the client knows exactly what the finished product will be. We've found this to result in good bids, smooth- running projects, and completion of construction on schedule. The principals of C G are Noel L. Christensen, P.E., President- Owner, and John A. Starner, P.E., Project Manager. Taken together, their experie:ze amount to in excess of 27 years in governmental and 14 years as consultants to governmental agencies which provides C G with an extremely broad back - gound in the civil engineering field. Brief resumes for Mr. Christensen and Mr. Starner follow: Noel L. Christensen, President - Dwner Education Bachelor of Science In Civil Engineering - South Dakota State University, 1961 Experience President, C G Engineering, 1974 -79 Vice President, Lampman and Associates, 1972 -74 Director of Public Works, City of Rialto, 1970 -72 Principal Engineer, City of Riverside, 1967 -70 Assistant Highway Engineer, State of California, 1961 -67 Professional License Registered Civil Engineer No. 15398 - State of California -7- John A. Starner - Project Manager Education Formal Education - San Bernardino Valley College Experience Project Manager, C G Engineering, 1977 -79 Office Manager, Ludwig Engineering, 1977 Project Manager, Vice President, C II Engineering, 1972 -77 Assistant Highway Engineer, State of California, 1970 -72 Professional License Registered Civil Engineer No. 20975 - State of California - Registered Civil Engineer in Arizona, Nevada, Oregon and Colorado Our practice 1s for one of our principals to be directly in charge of each project we are engaged in so that if questions arise or status reports are required the principal in charge can provide the necessary information to the client without the loss of time or accuracy resulting from moving too far up or down the information chain. The principals are assisted by the following staff: Name Position Beryle F. Brown Field Inspector William A. Dundas, P E Traffic Engineer Ronald K. Fowler, R.G Design Draftsman Valerie N Husbands Administrative Assistant William P. Kaminsky, L.S. Design Draftsman Yana R. Olson Design Draftsman Robert J Scarborough Design Draftsman Ricardo T. Ynostroza Design Draftsman In addition to the above listed office and field staff, we have contract surveyors to complete field survey requirements as follows: Fred C Cole, L S. Ted F1ke, L.S. Surveyor Surveyor -8- Recognizing the nature of the project, C G has considerable experience in the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for street improvement projects undertaken by governmental agencies. A listing of related projects we have been involved in during the past four years follows: Protect and Client Construction Cost Street Improvements Barton Road Improvements - City of Loma Linda $6,700 Barton Road Median Channelization - City of 23,500 Loma Linda Parkridge Avenue Improvement - City of Corona 45,000 - Benton Avenue 1911 Act - City of Loma Linda 13,000 Street Improvements - Academy, Orange Grove, 30,000 Van Leuven - City of ,.oma Linda Second Avenue Reconstruction, EDA Grant - 40,000 City of Upland Street Improvements at baton Road and 42,000 Loma inda Drive - City o° Loma Linda Intersection Modifications for Drainage 25,000 and Riding - City of Chino Assessment Engineering for Public Improvements 750,000 Sewer District 77 -1 With 337 Parcels - City of Barstow Widening and Improvement of Buena Vista - 196,000 City of Corona Benson Avenue Reconstruction - City of Chino 20,000 Mountain View Avenue Grade Separation - 1,600,000 (FAU -R033) - City of Loma Linda Street Improvements - Barton Road, Loma 20,000 Linda Drive - City of Loma Linda -9- Project and Client Construction Cost Hound Street /Stewart Street Improvements - $55,000 City of Loma Linda Street Improvements at Headquarters 15,000 Fire Station - City of Barstow Street Improvements - Rialto Industrial 250,ODO Park - Airport - City of Rialto In addition to the many projects both Mr Christensen and Mr Starner administered during their years to the public sector, other projects in which they played key parts white employed by another firm include: Project and Client Construction Cost Street Improvements Kelso Road Assessment District - City of Walnut $20,DOO Suzanne Road Reconstruction - City of Walnut 35,000 Vejar Road Assessment District - City of Walnut 7,000 Benton /Barton Widening - City of Loma Linda 190,000 Carrey /Valley /Pierre Street Improvements - 30,OCO City of Walnut Sierra Avenue Extension (FAU, FAS- R052(l)) - 1,600,000 City of Fontana and Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside South E Street Bridge Over Santa Ana 780,000 River - County of San Bernardino Flood Control District Main Street Overhead (FAS -SG- 1521(1)) - 1,200,000 Hesperia - County of San Bernardino Barttlet Avenue Improvement - City of Adelanto 800,000 C G would be pleased for you to contact our present or past clients relative to the type of work we do and our ability to adhere to project schedules. 0 e ( SAVO Ol A131VI41X08ddV 35711 1VA08ddV ONV M31A3b A1I3 ) 91118331110113 A8tl111W1138d 3111dWOl N N W > O O Q N N O T C ¢ o o v w u J H _ J •S O m W U N Z 0 6 S U N J � 4J NW O C 0 C � O O W O W 6 S33IA43S N1939 O1) 03Z180Hl0V 6L /EZ /E ( SAVO Ol A131VI41X08ddV 35711 1VA08ddV ONV M31A3b A1I3 ) 91118331110113 A8tl111W1138d 3111dWOl N N W u 0 ¢ 6 N O Z O 'a 3 a O N C6 O W 2 U• d w N /0- O C KN ZN QOQ t� Z Z H ¢ F• Q O Y W 1- W '+ J F• 6/- h •"^ O �"� N W Y U Ul N `I J c 0 4 Q U W y� � c N a� J � U � W �O a a K 2 O 6� LL LL � W O N9IS30 IVNId °W H1939 01 03ZI8OHInV--' 011I833NITO AHVNIHIl3Hd c 3131& 80d 3 4 Sd lIHOOS 9HISI1H3AOV 803 AOV3H SNVld 313ldII03 0 31WOMAI OW SiN3WV40i 3A3IO38 1NV1lOSNO0 c MIA3N 1VNtd 80d 3 4 Sd lIHOOS W W \ \ti \ r+ uup!! q6q �cW.� � C zt— aWo pCLL \K 6 ,> � O W Mm� J '+3LL o z Y � 4 W N W I- O V1 W U p ZZ ~ � p K � YWNJW INlUUK p�6 6 pr OO t; 'Y O N Z ZE Q� J Fop yW L2 OLL O� S uG ta. JQL' U V to Government PRE IAILM MIRLT PATES January, 1979 OFFICE Principal Engineer (Professional) Project Manager (Professional) Pssocfate Engineer Designer - Draftsman Draftsan Engineering Aide Clerical FIELD Resident Engineer (Professional) Inspector (Licensed) Inspector (Unlicensed) Field Survey Supervisor (Licensed) 2 Van Survey Party 3 Man Survey Party Electronic Measuring Device MISCELUXEDUS SERVICES MO EXPENSES Mileage Prints, Copying, Reproduction Outside Consultant Services L2730 KAM94MAVISMSUME - &4W1BZXXAKDMO GUF0JW1Af2#W , tn022421S to Government AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY C G Engineering has provided in the past and will continue to provide employment opportunities for quallfiod lndiv' duals regardless of race, color, religion, sex or creed. Employees are recruited through newspaper advertisements in the San Bernardino and Riverside general circulation newspapers Since this has.not produced an overabundance of minority _ applicants in the past, future job advertisements will also be included to area minority publications. Employees are provided the opportunity of professional growth through Increased job responsibility to the degree they wish to participate 2677 SO.17ATERMN AVENUE, SUITE E • SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 92408 • (714)r.42420 qd M W OLL H Y A O r N N O C O A C U C A <I V AM G� A u z LL a o u Y C4v C 2 46rNi W � U �J C W A N Y U A 0 a L d O of r Z W N d OI N A J NI H Y 7 = 3NI C d A VM A INTRODUCTORY BROCHURE C H J 14ATERIALS LABORATORY, INC. C• H•J• Ih this brochure, it is our intention to acquaint the reader with the complete testing and inspection services available from C.H.J Materials Laboratory C H J Materials Laboratory lids provided soils engineering, and construction testing and inspection services to the Southern California construction industry since its founding in 1964 With a well staffed organization of experienced personnel, C H.J. Materials Laboratory offers prompt, efficient service to our clients. C. N•J- SLRVICES C.H.J Materials Laboratory offers a professional organization, staffed and equipped to provide complete soil mechanics, foundation engineering and consulting services; cunstruction materials testing; field and laboratory quality control of concrete, soil, asphalt, wood, steel construction operations; owner representation and contract administration for construction SPECIALTIES Foundation Investigation Mechanical and Physical Testing of Materials Product Quality Control and Testing Construction Quality Control Soil- Cement Design Portland Cement Concrete Design Masonry Inspection Applied Reseai,h and Development of Construction Materials and Related Prcducts Held Testing and Inspection Ilon- Destructive Testing Field Load - Settlement Tests Asphaltic Concrete Design C• H•J• STAFF PERSONNEL JOHN L. RIDDELL. President and General Manager Registered Civil Engineer, State of California B.S civil Engineering, University of California 2 1/2 years on rotation program, California Division of Highways (Design Dept., Construction Dept , Survey Dept., Drainage Dept., Materials Testing Lab., Advance Planning Dept.) 2 1/2 years California Division of Highways, Drainage Dept - 3 years California Division of Highways, Resident Engineer, Construction Department 2 years self - employed, Riddell. Strahm and Hoerning (Civil Engineering and Land Surveying) 14 years President an General Manager, C.H J. Materials Laboratory, Inc. DONALD 0 SWOON, Executive Vice President mgistered Quality En3ireer, State of California Membcr, Construction Inspectors Association 3 years specialized engineering courses, Riverside City College Weltech College, Salt Lake City, Utah 2 years Inspector and Materials Technician, Northern Testing Laboratories, Inc., Montana 1 1/2 years Chairman- Instrunentman, Civil Engineering firm 4 years Inspector and Materials Technician, c.H.J. Materials Lab., Inc. 3 years Director of Testing and Inspection, C.11 J. Materials Lab., Inc. 6 years Executive Vice President, C.H.J. laterials Lab., Inc. .3- ROBERT J. JOHNSON, Secretary- Treasurer, Director of Soils Division Registered Professional Engineer, State of California 0 S., San Diego State College 3 years Various Engineering Courses, San Diego State College and San Bernardino Valley College 2 years Materials Engineer, lasler Corporation 2 years Chief Laboratory Technician, C.H.J. Materials Lab , Inc. 5 years Director, Soils Division, C.II.J. Iaterials Lab., Inc. RUCERT NOTTINWAM, vice President, Director of Physical Testing b Inspection Div. Registered Quality Engineer, State of California B.S. Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University' - 4 years, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad 2 years Project Engineer, Arrowhead Engineering Corporation 2 years Assistant Project Manager, Dart Resorts 4 years Director of Physical Testing and Inspection Division, C.11 J Materials Lab., Inc. ROBERT P. BELL, Staff Engineer Engineer -In- Training, State of California B S Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University Master of Engineering Program, California State Polytechnic University 1 1/2 years, Staff Engineer, C.H.J. Materials Lab , Inc. 1 1/2 years, Laboratory and Field Technician, C.II J Materials Lab., Inc. -4- I.' I' SCHEDULE OF FEES C.H J. MATERIALS LABORATORY, INC. SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 1 C• N•J• SOILS ENGINEERING AND TESTING ENGINEERING, OFFICE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICES C• "- J- Effective 9 -1 -78 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA RATE PER HOUR Litigation, Expert Witness 6 Preparat v^ by Professional Engineer - Four -hots Mil ^uns. .... 5 60.00 Pri,,icipal Engineer .... .. .. .. .. 50.00 Staff Engineer. .. ... .. .. .. .. 40.00 Field technician. .. ... .. .. 23 50 Lab Technician. ... . ..... .. .... ... 23 50 Typing, Clerical ................ ............................... 15.00 Subsistence and Lodging - Per Day Su6ject to review for specific projects . ........ .. ... 30.00 -i- IIOTE: The hourly rates quoted above include all costs for 1 TieTU equipment, vehicle and normal routine supervision for which our clients will pay no additional charges. Computer time (For Engineering Analysis) cost + 20% Printfi,g and Photographic Hark... .... .. ... .. ...cost + 20% ' Subcontract Services .. ..... . ... cost + 20% ' PRF14ILH RATES A. Overtime (at client's request) .... .. .. . ..... .... 30.00 8 Sunday and Holidays.. .... .. .. 36 00 REPORTS - EXTRA COPIES Current Files - Not over one year old ' Minimum Service Charge, per Report 5.00 Copies, per sheet .. .. .. .. ... .. •0.15 ' Inactive Files - one year or older i Minimum Service Charge, per Report. ... ..... 7 50 Copies, per sheet ... .. ... . . .. ... . ..... ... .. ..... 0.15 -i- i C• H•J• EQUIPMENT CHARGES '• FIELD EQUIPMENT Pick -up Truck and Automobile Mileage .... . . ....... . ..... . No Charge E%PLORATOPY EQUIPMENT Drill Rig ........ .... . . .. .. .. .... .. .... . . cost + 20% .� Backhoe ... .... ....... . :. .. . ... .... .. ... ..... cost f 20% I t -2- Ic H•J- SCIL TESTING Atterberg Limit Tests: Atterberg Limits Complete..... ... .. .. .. $ 65.00 Consolidation Tests.. ..... .... . ........ ..... .. .... .. 60.00 Direct Shear Tests ... ...... .. . . . . ..... 60.00 Maximum Density - Optimum Moisture Determination All Standard Specifications . ... ... .... ... 60.00 Mechanical Analysis with Hydrometer Analysis . ... .. . .... 50 00 Moisture Content ... ... .. .. .. ... . . . 7 00 Percolation Study (Field) Estimated Cost for Single Lot ... .. .. ... QUOTATION - Complete Parcel or Subdivision ... QUOTATION "R" -Value Determination .. .. ... ... .... 110.00 Sand Equivalent .. .. ..... .... .. .. .. 18 00 Sieve Analysis washed on the No. 200 Sieve .... .. .... 32 00 Expansion Test ...... ... .. .. . . . . . . 55 00 Specific Gravity ..... ..... .. .. .. ... ... .. 23 00 Visual Classification.... . . . . ...... .. ...... 7.00 Soil Cement Holding and Compressive Strength Test .. 50.00 Soil Cement Molding and Het - Dry Test. .... .. ... 110.00 Soil Cement Folding and Freeze - Thaw Test .......... .... 110.00 -3- 4 AASPHALT .XIZTUMES R, f Asphalt pavement 10% 0esfga (Jfarsf all or Bran rettod) .......... S 3M.t0 Includfog Kecessary tests on A97epte repirad to- Cesfga. Asphalt Content by Estractf= .... ............................... 45,00 Asphalt Content and Gra& otfon .... ............................... C6.0 Bulk Specirfc Gravity Vz thad ..... ............................... 19.00 Moisture Vapor Saw eptfbflfty .... ............................... 80.0D Stabfffty Value by Stabilometer .... .. ................ ....... ..._ 43.00 Swell Test_...... ........... .... ............................... 31.00 Marshall or Stabflometer Cemparfsam wSO Pavement Rensfty two (2) Sfs¢ alts ............................. 35.00 -4- P.O. Boa 7021 • 1526 No. "E' Sl,ect, Sun Be,nordino, Colil. 02413 • Phone 1714) 880.5714 Effective 9 -1 -78 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA C H.J. MATERIALS LABORATORY, INC SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR INSPECTION SERVICES NOTE: C H.J Materials Laboratory, Inc. is a Signator to an Aggreement with the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 12, AFL -CIO, covering the licensed building inspectors. This aggreement covers wages, fringe benefits and conditions and working hours The prices quoted below for inspection services are firm to September 1, 1979 only. INSPECTION FEES FIELD Concrete Plant, per hour ...... . ... $ 24 50 INSPECTION Concrete Job, per hour .. ........ 24 50 SERVIC'- Masonry, per hour. .. . ....... 24 50 WHILE ON JOB Gunite, per hour. .... .. .. .. 24 50 Pile Driving and Prestress, per hour. 24.50 Structural Steel b Welding, per hour 24.50 lion- Destructive Testing - Ultrasonic .. 30 00 SAMPLING Technician for sampling Structural Steel, Brick Block, Reinforcing Steel, a.ld Corcrete Cylinder pick-up (includes mileage within 40 mile radius of lal,) per hour. . . .. ... .. 23 50 Laboratory services not included in unit prices Laboratory Technician, per hour ...... ... ... 23.50 SEE PAGE 1110 FOR CONDITIONS AND WORKING HOURS r -5- - IOJt% MSC4A111C$ ING1N1141NG • MAHRIAIS IWING AND 1VAIUA ION . CONSTRUCTION INSPICIION ry u Effective 9 -1 -78 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA C.H J. MATERIALS LABORATORV, INC. SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR INSPECTION SERVICES CONDITIONS AND WORKING HOURS MINIMUM CHARGES SHOW -UP - NO INSPECTION PERFORMED - 2 HOURS, 1 -4 HOURS INSPECTION PERFORMED - 4 HOUR MINIMUM, OVER 4 HOURS UP TO 8 HOURS - 0 HOUR MINIMUM NOTE: If inspector reports to work before 1P. :00 noon anT'works past 12:00 noon, 8 hours will be charged TRAVEL TiME Ho Travel Time or mileage within 40 miles of our laboratory. For projects outside and within 100 miles, mileage will be charged, Mileage will be charge at the rate of 30t per mile. REGULAR TIME First 8 hours, Monday through Friday, between the hours _ of 7:00 a m. and 5 00 p m. TIME ACID After first 8 hours on shift, before 7:00 a.m. and after ONE -HALF 5:00 p m. Monday through Friday and Saturday. DOUBLE TIME Sundays TRIPLE TIME Holidays (Following Days New Year's, Declaration, Independence, Labor, Veterans, Thanksgiving, Day after Tnanksgiving, Christmas and the First Saturday following the First Friday of the months of June and December). SHIFT SECOND (SWING) SHIrT Differential Eight (8) hours will be charged for first 7 1/2 hours worked Time in excess of 7 1/2 at applicable overtime rate. THIRD (GRAVEYARD) SHIFT Eight (8) hours will be charge for first 7 hours worked Time in excess of 7 hours at applicable overtime rate PARKING When not furnished for inspec•.or, parking will be charged as paid by the Inspector. SUBSISTENCE On remote jobs over 100 miles from our laboratory, sub- sistence, when not furnished for Inspector, will be charge at $30 00 per day COMPLETION Inspector will remain on job until discharged by competent Authority. CANCELLA`ION No charge if made before 4 00 p m. of the preceeding day. SEE tlINIMUM CHARGE TERMS OF PAYMENT Net - Invoices are for Professional Services and are due on presentation -6- M [1 C". " - w -j- INSPECTION Complete structural inspection and quality control services available on all civil engineering phases of construction. Inspection, per hour.. ... .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. ... $ 24 50 ASPHALT _ CONCRETE Hot Plant Inspection Batch Plant Inspection Paving Inspection Placement and Quality Control Placement of Reinforcement Prestressed STEEL Structural Fabrication Welding (Shop and Field) High Strength Bolting Ultrasonic Inspection GUNITE Placement of Reinforcement Quality Control of Placement -7- KASONRY Brick, Block Laying Grouting Placement of Reinforcement C• N•J• AGGREGATES CONCRETE - ASPHALT - MORTAR - GROUT BASE COURSE - MISCELLAIIEOUS Abrasion Resistance (L.A. Rattler) .. .. . .. . . . $ 43 00 Centrifuge Kerosene Equivalent - Coarse and Fine .. 92.00 (Including Specific Gravity and Sieve Analysis) Clay Lumps. .. ... ... .. 19 00 Cleanness Value. .. ... .. 50.00 Durability Factor - Coarse . . . . . .. ... .. .. 55 00 Fine . . . . . . . . .. ... 55 00 Flat or Elongated Pieces Per Size without Gradation. .. Fractured Faces (Count or Weight) Per Size without Gradation .. .. . Maximum Density - Optimum Moisture Determination (All Standard Specifications). .. ... . Moisture Content .. .. .. .. . Mortar Making Properties of Fine Aggregate (A.S T.M C- 87 -6 ?) Organic Impurities . ... . . . . . . ... . . .. -a- ■ 31 00 31.00 60.00 8 00 150 00 20.00 C• "- J- AGGREGATES CONT.. ... Atterberg Limit Tests. ... .. ... .. ... $ 70.00 "R" Value Determination. .... .. 110.00 Sand Equivalent ... .. .. ... .. .. .. 19 00 Sieve Analysis - Coarse (Processed) ....... ... 18.00 Sieve Analysis - Fine Flashed on No 200 Sieve ... 32 00 Sieve Analysis (Pitrun Material) .. ... .. 32.00 Material Finer than the 200 Sieve ............................... 12.00 Oecantation (Washed through /200 Mesh). .. ... 12 00 - Soft Particles ..... .... .. ... 28.00 Soundness Test (5 -Cycle Magnesium or Sodium Sulfate) - Fine. 110.00 Coarse. 110.00 Specific Gravity and Absorption. Film Stripping Test. .. .. . Weight per Cubic Foot .... Percentage of Clay - Hydrometer Method... Percent Shale... ...... Potential Reactivity (Chemical Method). -9- 15 00 29 00 15 00 50.00 ... .. .. 12 00 .. ..... 120.00 C• N•J• CONCRETE - GUNITE - MASONRY MORTAR - GROUT - CEMENT TREATED BASE CONCRETE MIX DESIGN Concrete Ilix Design (Exclusive of Aggregate Tests). . ..... .. $ GO 00 Trial Mix (6" x 12" Compression Test Cylinders Made in Laboratory, minimum of 9 cylinders). per cylinder .. 12 00 + 66.00 Labor d Equipment Trial Mix (6" x 6" Flexural Test Beams made in Laboratory, minimum of 6 beams). ..per beam.. 18 00 + 90.00 Labor d Equipment Shrinkage Test (4" x 4" x 11" Prisms 7, 14, 21 and 28 day) ...... 116.00 each Modulus of Elasticity (6" x 12" Cylinders) .. 36.00 each Tensile Splitting Test (6" x 12" Cylinders) .. 14 00 each Dry Unit Weight of 6" x 12" Cylinders.. ... 8.00 each MORTAR MIX DESIGN (Exclusive of Aggregate Tests) ..... ... 50.00 each GROUT MIX DESIGN (Exclusive of Aggregate Tests) .. 50.00 each COMPRESSIVE TESTS Cement Treated Base Cylinder or Core... . .. .. . . 10 00 each- Concrete Cylinder.. .. 8 00 each Mortar Cylinder. ... .. .. 8 00 each Grout Prism. .... . .. .... 9 00 each Gunita Cylinder .... 11.00 each Cored Concrete - Trimming Extra if N"eded .. . .. .. ..... 11.00 each Masonry Core. .. .. .. .. 11.00 each Masonry Core (Shear) .. .. .. 27 00 each Concrete or Masonry Core Trimming .. 11 00 each Masonry Assemblage (Prism) 60.00 each -10- s9c• 1Fa•...11• CONCRETE GUNITE - MASONRY - MORTAR - GROUT - CEIIENT TREATED BASE CONT. .. FLEXURAL TESTS (3rd POINT OR SIMPLE FLEXURE): 6" x 6" Beams. .. .. .. .. ........ . ... .. $ 17.00 9" x 9" Beams... .. ... . ..... ... . .... . ....... "7 00 MISCELLANEOUS: Dry Unit Height of Insulating Concrete . .. .... 11 00 Compressive Strength of Insulating Ct,crLtL ... 11.00 - Analysis of Roof Cuts on Build -Up Roufing .. .. .. .. 50.00 CORING: CONCRETE, MASONRY AND ASPHALT Four Hour Minimum Charge Diamond Bit Charge .. . . . ... S 2 CO/inch of Depth or Fraction Thereof Operator . . ..... .. .. .. .. . . . . . . 23 50 per /hr.. Concrete Core Trimming .. .. .. 10.00 each Concrete Core Compression.. 10.00 each (Additional Technician when required) .. .. ... 23 50 per /hr. -il- ,r IM - W4.. 2- MASONRY UNITS BRICK - BLOCK - ADOBE BRICK OR CLAY TILE Absorption: 24 -Hour Cold Water Only ..... ............................... $ 10.00 each 5 -Hour Boil.. .. ... .. .... .. .. 10.00 each Compression ... .. ... .. 12.00 each Flexural or Modulus of Rupture .. .. .. .. . ..... 12 00 each CONCRETE BLOCK Absorption, 24 -Hour Cold Water .... .... .... . .... 10 00 each Moisture Content as Received .. .. 9 00 each Compressive Strength....... ... 14.00 each Linear Drying Shrinkage. .. .. .. 36 00 each Unit Weight . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. 8 00 each ADOBE BRICK 1 Absorption. .... .. ...... ........ . Compression ... �• Modulus of Rupture .. Moisture Content as Received . . ... .. ... ... -12- . ... 10 00 each 12.00 each 12.00 each .... . ... 9 00 each KD- "- J- S TEEL REINFORCING STEEL Tensile Strength, 911 Bar and Smaller.... ... .. S 12 00 each Bend Test, 911 Bar and Smaller . . . ... ... ..... ...... 12.00 each Tensile Strength, 914 Bar .. ........ .... 27.00 each Tensile Strength, 918 Bar .. ... . ....... .. .. 42 00 each STRUCTURAL STEEL Tensile Strength, up to 100,000 pounds ...... .... .. 12.00 each Tensile Strength, 100,000 to 200,000 pounds .. .. .. 14.00 each Tensile Strength, 200,000 to 300,000 pounds .. 17 00 each Tensile Strength, 300,000 to 400,000 pounds .. 21.00 each Bend Test. .. ... I . ...... . .. 12.00 each Machining and Preparation of Sample.... .. . ... .. .. 12 00 each PRESTRESSING WIRES AND TENrONS Tensile Test 0 ly .. . ..... . .. . Tendons: 7 to ,. Wire... 12 to 20 Wire ...... . . .. .. above 20 Wire ... .. .... . -13- .. ..... 11 00 each ... ... 30.00 each ..... .... ... 42.00 each . .... .. .. QUOTE e, 11 11 C• D -1!•J• MISCELLANEOUS CALIBRATION OF HYDRAULIC JACKS AND RAMS 60 Ton and Under . ........ . .......... . .. ...... . $ 48 00 61 Ton and 100 Ton ....... ......... . .. 53 00 Over 100 Ton. ... .. ... .. ......... 60.00 LABORATORY EQUIPMENT Ilse of 400,00 lb. Baldwin with Operator ... Use of 300,000 lb. Tinius Olsen with Operator . .. .. . . I ^ of 30,000 lb Versatester with Operator. ... .... Additional Technician when required .. ... .... . -14- 89 00 per /hr. 42 00 per /hr 30.00 per /hr. 23 50 per /hr _P CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1979 To: City Council & City Maoager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: PROPOSAL REVIEW - BASELINE PROJECT Attached for Council review are proposals submitted to the City for design services for the reconstruction of Baseline Street as shown on the attached nap. Listed below are the proposed design fees from each firm: FIRM PRELIMINARY DESIGN DESIGN COIISTRUCTIOII STAKING I TOTAL ceTiuAr* - C G ENGINEERING I $11,930 6,100 2,720 1 20,750 L D Kit 12,000 6,200 1,440 19,640 • All firms indicated that construction staking should be on a hourly basis rather than on a not to exceed basis. Staff would concur in this approach Based on the low price for the Design phase, staff will recommend that the City enter into agreement with Associated Engineers for this project This recom- mendation will come to the Council at its April 4, 1979 meeting. The firms selected to propose are all locally based Municipal Engineering firms with a broad experience in this type of work The prices are virtually the same and selection of any of the firms would be acceptable. If you have any questions about consultant select%n procedures, feel free to call anytime. _Cordially, L D HU BS ty Engineer LH:deb `` SS • SAY •DIEGO ),4Yr,In A''1' z Ili oAvc4tOAVE n r a i 1 I AVE SW 01[60 )„ E � D t `• 6510 VI N[YA AS O °rZ C I ,•1 r }� AVE e e•1 e s Y�� Ord or 5q gU55 LRCOR AVE : `LA21 9 r•i.'Ir�. 5 1 4r S AGAtE ST `o N VpCA y ` pp IIt1S0 N f� °s AGi,EE St GARNET F p S 70 ^ ST b'.Y t- ) PP I1jjGi -n411 GLWE) 177) SI :r r a a BEN,L S (y tl •'1St C O b 14150 ! 3 yl BCRIL S ' 01 SPINET AV[ ..• b VR15 11410 ° N % ' e!!0 N ' NrJO -0•'I� 1dIW u0700 IS UON U04 SI (A I p0 f 191100 St 1• I 5171(7( • �� r� N. (Tk .�- ° I 1 0 0• uON tARA AVE A9TIU0 t J b LION A Y E s L � a ^ ^t 560BOJ N 560000 a r7J5 y� OYr ej/ ,• • ^C SEL., AVE o Y r( 8< A JY K N7U0 y :I IVV /596 r3 0 I o R 9 G k141"O AVE C °461150 D : + LAYtON ST i 614150 109250 C 469150 y n' P ILaYTON JNTY aq N- X I v •' d / AY wr 1 ^ AnJrSo. ST o n 9U6♦ a L-1r AV[ s 114100 • �. _ °p1'^t4 AVE ° A9/1yJ a + z b11po i 320950 g IYiLLi�AyrC•wrt [ AVE N ni A L9ACNITEg u r (7 a 4932 o n 11160 UEt(( Af200° i` II Av� •�' • i [I. U'Y Y AVE : •I^ ' 11� D j.t� vv. b - K JADEIt E -AVE : iVi •L U%.AN AY 4619 Go A, 3 Q ^' n �� ° JACEITE 4vL N Iz y 7 AVE R�.. ..«� �, ° FAU R07 OUR �GUYOr AVC �1771U AVE R if Z VALVE AVE AVE y 40 /. i ll,ir•• y i AVE b 5056566 •• �� °• O AAYONI 561750 '• °o• PERLITE T ?: � O•� n • y t •jam' : y°T IIlIo • 61 Aa SN RE AVE- k; 60e11 EAX EIMN 00 A CI y na r. 1 y u• z UNURSt aII _ •, 266550 - ".$ v a aB R10 [ c AVE O y { w ELYNUR I R 191 o` 0376 50 f7110Y0EAr Y ^ z = YATT[RNO[N 171 10 J 1 1 N ° AV O •'tl J• I J O �A, rl O w [YIE ti.l! _ t �y ti Y • COfIEL CT C[MLII Av 1 Nr LN C • . r. —tear n e ••; . I z w W i= , 1 1 Z 1z J {� I1.N117N d W e3 MIN'Il7N -- ' 1 � I• • • O K J � f ZOZ •t hli_ _• - 300�YBM V] Z O QW W V, ' 1. -11 Vl' a R Q d' Co � ¢U I II�N• WWn I �° W�< � W N011 !E � f=� •NONOY 111101 Y f I a = rl oS V �I• I 1: N I � Obi Q III I� �S I� I•�� i I N. it W� I, 1_N I I KOr N r— • ` V N N N 0 M N M M I I wwwa w111 W•w5 • PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BASELINE STREET OVERLAY RECONSTRUCTION AND MINOR WIDENING, MARCH, 1979 Associated Engineers CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 316 EAST'F STREET • ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91764 • (7141888 -8818 • Associated Engineers CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 718 EAST *E' STREET • ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91784 • (714) 988 -5818 March 20, 1979 Mr. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 797 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91770 Subject: Engineering Services for Baseline Street overinyp reconstruction and minor widening. Reference: Your Request for Proposals dated March 5, 1979 (Attached as Enclosure "A "). • Dear Hr. Iiubbs: We are pleased to have the opportunity to offer our services for the subject work and to submit the attached Proposal together with a discussion of our qualifications for the type of work involved. • We appreciate being considered for this work and look forward to working with your office • REM/kb Enclosure <i y 3t,? 60y ...lr: Very truly yours, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS R.E. Hills, President • 1. QUALIFICATIONS A STAFF • Associated Engineers have had offices engaged In general civil engineering practice In Ontario since 1955 and San Diego since 1957 although the Ontario office is the parent company. We are adequately staffed and equipped to provide the required services Our Ontario •• star' Is over 30 employees of whom nine are licensed in the State of California, seven as Registered Civil Engineers and two as Licensed Land Surveyors Resume's of key personnel are attached as Enclosure .,C" r D EXPERIENCE 1. General In the twenty three years our firm has been in Ontario we have • designed many similar projects for various titles, the County or San Bernardino, other public agencies and for private developers In { addition key personnel have previous re'ated experience as employees of public agencies such as Cal Trans, Carious County agencies, agencies •� of the Federal Government and of several different City Engineering Departnens,inciuding the City of Ontario, R E Mills being a former City Engineer of Onta ' 4ee Enclosure C — "Key Personnel ") 2 Qualifying Projects The (ollowing are some examples of recent similar projects designed or being designed by our firm. (a) Southwest Ontario • We have recently completed designs for the City of Ontario for the resurfacing and partial reeonslruction of three streets totalling about 21 miles in length In the soulhrest section of the City. 50 (b) Los Serranos We Pre currently completing plans and specifications for the reconstruction of a number or streets In the Los Serranos area for the County of San Bernardino under the Federal clock Grant program (c) 29 Palms We have recently submitted to the Navy ffnAl plans and specifications for the resurfacing of approximately 5 miles of roadway at the Marine Corps Base at 29 Palms (d) Central Avenue Completed In 1974 was an FAU project which we did for the i City of Chinu on Central Avenue from Rlvrtrsidc Drive to Schaefer Avenue. This protect Involved reconstruction and /or resurfacing or Chino's main street through the central area of the City on a tight time schedule. It contained a number of grade cow rots due to existing facilities which were difficult to fit. It also Irduded design or traffic signals, street lighting system, a railroad crossing, and extensive storm drain • facilities P (e) Ontario We are currently designing plans for resurfacing two streets in the northerly part of Ontario totalling about I } miles In length -2- It. PROPOSAL We propose to accomplish all work at our regular hourly rates attached as Enclosure "B" except for the sd is and pavement analysis and report which we will subcontract to Richar,' Mills Associates of Rancho Cucamonga. W. will furnish these services to the City for a lump sum of $1,700.00.• We will perform the work specified In Enclosure A including the Soils and fhvement analysis and report for a fee not to exceed $20,200. This a figure includes an allowance or S4,000 for construction staking. It is very difficult to estimate this figure prior to design, particularly when the amount of staking to be furnished to the Construction Contractor is not specified. S We suggest as an alternate proposal a fee not to exceed $16.200 for _ Preliminary and Final Design as specified by Enclosure A with construction staking to be billed hourly and to be provided only when authorized by the City dl Enclosure B applies through July 31, 1979 at which time we must in- crease all wage rates an anticipated 6%. Any work after that date will be at rates 8% higher. It is also proposed that the "not to exceed" figure will be increased by 8% of that portion or the work not completed by July 31, 1979 0 it Is assumed that it selected we will be ble to complete the work prior to that date, but this is not entirely within our control since scheduling is dependent on processing time by both the City and Cal Trans it seems likely that construction staking In particular may extend beyond July 31, 1979. We estimate we can complete Phase A, Preliminary Design, within 25 to 30 working days and Phase B, Final Design, within 50 to 60 working days from the Notice to Proceed o See Enclosure D for scope of services to be provided by Richard Mills Associates. -3- • • Enclosure "A" a / City of • v�. CUCA1 ONGA 1 e; • ``S,�r /```�J 'March 5, 1979 Associated Engineers late 316 East "E" Street Ontario, California 91764 • SUBJECT: RF.QlILFr FOR PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN SERVICES - RAS)LINE STREET OVERLAY, RECONSTRUCTION AND MINOR WIDENING Gentlemen: • The City of Rnm ho Cucamonga, invites yonr firm to submit a proposal for engineering serilees for the preparation of structural sertion dcaign and design plans, speciflrations and estimates for the reconstruction overlay and minor widening of Baseline Street from oast of Vineyard Avenue to 11cll- man P•venue and Irom Archibald Avenue to west of Hermosa Avenue as shown on • the attached mal.. The proposed project will be funded through Federal Aid Urban (FAU) funds and be in conformance with Federal Aid requirements and the specification format of Caltrann, District S Office 1. SCOPE OF WORK • The chosen consulting firm shall perform the following scopa of work: A Preliminary Design • 1 Perform all necessary field enrvcys within 100 foot ultimate right of way to establish ultlmate otrect cross sections, street and curb liofile grades within the project limits 2 Perform necessary coringa, soils testa for deflection analysis to satisfy needs of Federal requirements for structural section design • 3 Prepare report recommending overlay thickness, etnirturnl section dCRiLa and pavement rrmnvnl limits. ParliciOnr rmphnsis shall he Paid to CXIRIin¢ concrete sertionR and niteruntive trenlmrnln or pavement. Report will require Caltrnns approval. Ttafflc indexes and data will be provided by the City • 4, Research mid plot existing right of way limits. 5. Determine scope of widening which can be constructed within exist- , ing right of way which will fit ulticate design parameters A -1 Ansoctated Engineers Page 2 March S, 1979 G 6. Plot existing utilities 7 Review preliminary design parameters, ntructural section design and cost estimates with the City and coordinate with Coltrane. B. Final Oeslgn 1 Upon approval of preliminary design concept, rise engineer shall prepare final design plans showing the ultimate street design for full widening including necessary drive approach modifications, curb grades and required typical sections 2. Utilizing ultimate street plan design, the consultant shall over- lay the interim improvement design to include widening within existing right of way, overlay and necessary construction. • 3. Prepare contract documenta, specifications and quantity estimates in conformance with City. State and Federal guidelines for Interim project construction. 4 Submit design plans and cross section to City and Coltrane for plan check and review. S Make necessary plan revisions to meat City and State requirements and approval. 6 Prepare 20 eats of finished design plans, specification and engineers eatimates. 7. Upon receipt of bids, consultant shall analyze bids and make recom- mendation on award of eentract. C Construction s 1 Engineer shall provide all required construction staking. 2 Engineer shall be available for consultation during constr •tion on any needed plan revisions. 3. Make recommendation on contract change orders A. Prepare project as -built plans. II. PROPOSAL REQUIR121ENTS Proposal shall include the followings r 1i A. Qualficatlon of firm and key personnel including history of similar projects B. Project staffing �. A -2 .J Associated Enbineers Page 3 Hatch 5, 1979 • C Schedule for completion of each )base of design D. Project budget not to exceed maximum for preliminary design phase, final • design phase and construction staking. Printing charges will be paid at coat Hourly rates shall be included for billing and construction phone consultation. Seven (7) copies of the project proposal shall be submitted no later than 5:00 P.M , Friday, March 23, 1979, at the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Community Develop- cent Department, 9340 Banelino Street, Suite A. Any questions on this proposal shall be directed to Hr Paul Rougeau at 989 -1851. Cordially, • -(�,/ 1 - f \�/lCfiLf7 HUBBS C ty Engineer LBti:deb e • t: i, �f A -3 ` , •��"l� 4s' * {`P ,.I. s SACAAV[N TO AVE N g SUl aC T AVE A A SAN Ol�Cfq 7AVE � wn T ( -• 6510 C y 121407 `" „e VI , 409r MCrA60 AVE 'r ^4 y /S1D70 21ACn4 Av( • `V 9 �4I� 7 t f AGATE St �• 11$1304 -•^ AG 1t ft .3i'^ i ♦ ° _ ' ` ll`ISSE��, NN 10"30 ^ ' n N ' GARNET 5i 'SV - } c G4PNEt S GA ANCT fT . YY r I s BERYL 5 >s ` r ft I71Ap0 •, ♦� j• BtPll Or [ �` iS Ef Y, V (n : fP1N4 J AVE `r o 40,4 tiL 114150• 1665l1��� I Tr Nr`TO �'3'OA 411100 ( {`• 110700 i a LION 1.`c -C��� DDD LION fT f17AM roD rC nom' • w 49)100 1HI ft ' •s. AVE iL^ i ° n NJN TARAy AVE 497100 ! 7 m %lot yK i A C T !60604 N b6 C ^ 0•I t4 Pir K w CT / aY AV 5608001 7 fRV/ AVE o Y ( ° < tl1 400 �• c r 79ar• 0 7`sc R19 x ...A. o o 0- io c161(eDO {L AVE to ` °•, '^a S w 46715050 Nr j�\ i. s ' y§ n ON A LAYTON 31 6..110 I(S ,.• ,�,_„ K r..� 9210 (_ A69150 n i 4 i [LA TON r5T ♦ m = 09750 AY IN, t PQ ? 4e9F70,e• V LS z m -7 1-"•• ST O PUOY a LAY AVE `+ 119tH" w -- 7�CT_SZ7 op ^+3 LvE n° tli 520913 ' VAL A[wltt AVE `m' MAL4CNITE " m m A, • m a N 4 +1�G3t ° ° ! 1S M m 111103 nvE 9) _ ^ j � 7 z° Mlt 0 9 o ) " pit yl AVEAVE • �1 °��� y0 IJ n�yv •"„ ro3r» ' ° clU7YAN A•C 7ADII9E AVE c IN J OCit AN <y AV A67900N 1 [ m •••ni �N. �o NK ISI m = 445550 N N t 1 y • i3 :. y= _ FAU R07 a � �. erun3r AVE AvE InIS7 K as lip - VE i 0 VALVE AV( S YC• °° IrViv y tvf o •. i ff = 50705Qc �n 1. 7A5•t 1 AVE me m ^ MO I _ Pia_ 641750 o °± ° % o °• PER1.I7C r =� v n i ° q 64Yr50 v.b B ° = y o n I I �_' s l �• CAV044NL AK �� ='u =�T •6EPA fN :PE AVE _ 71 t W no 11 LA e0611 A 4 115 Do • r K iDAR r43UtN m IVE L4•nn wI, ' Z96350 j yT• u AYBPID( [ ." LEINNUP3l 4\r n [�-D 20 rr5 • c o AVE �p°O°S111I `� R 191 ( u LLYN 326 y l 9776 f0 SJIIOOEPN v ° r� N WriCR �OPN 171 SDTw ^z ; 1lll 11 m t . ^ls ArA i si J t VEN T4 .I a i •: J ^ .Y LMIIA N• y y ° r a �I�J LI_I m D C C , LIi00�E i v s CONRLL CT A -4 1V I NV LN _ 17 , N n I ANY 11IA t u r) T m% No .. • M no !r' � ~ I ;o a o; z�, - �NYb1t3N � � O i h b• Uh \ Sr � 0. O fn� NW WWI ll� L.I..a �04� T •MONOtl Tl:j 1AM30 i'Ir y I�n lJNtl"� II o F — W V N � O � W i n e � • Q i 6 ! F a/ `— alreINJYY p p'pi V xiO J; CYr \3NIA� ({ — — -- x R1U 6Tnfv6— A-5 Enclosure "6" O • • Associated Engineers CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 319 EAST'S' STREET • ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91794 IIUURLV RATES (Effective 8/1/78) Principal Registered Civil Engineer Senior Registered Civil Engineer Principal Licensed Land Surveyor t Associate Civil Engineer Associate Land Planner • Registered Civil Engineer Senior Designer /Draftsman Designer /Draftsman Draftsman • Varilyping Key Punch Operator Secretarial • 17141980-5818 848.00 per hour $40.00 per hour $40.00 per hour $35 00 per hour $35.00 per hour $32 00 per hour $30.00 per hour $27.00 per hour $25.00 per hour $22.00 por hour $16.00 per hour $16.00 per hour • 3 -Mon Survey Party S95 00 per hour 2 -Flan Survey Party $75 00 per hour 3 -Man Survey Party with Electronic Distance i Measuring Equipment $102 00 per hour f 2 -Flan Survey Party with Electronic Distance • Measuring Equipment 884 Ob per hour 4 These hourly rates do not Include printing costs which are billed at cost or fees paid to o Governmental agencies or others PLANNING 12 JJESIGNING SURVEYING :7 6 Enclosure "C" F Robert L•'. Mills License: Civil FnRincer Registration No 7344 - State of California • Professional Engineer Registration No. 3958 - State of Nevada Education: D S in Civil Engineering - 1943 University or California, Berkeley, California Affiliations: Member - American Society of Civil ingineers Member - American Winer Works Association Member - California Council Civil Engineers & land Surveyors Association Experience: Plant Construction, Kaiser Steel Corporation, Fontana, California, 1943 • Active Uuty with United Slates Navy Ship Rep.. Officer. Final Duty - Officer in Charge, noats Repair Facility N.S.F Cavite, Phlllipine Islands, Rank Lt (j.g.) 1943 - 1946 limployed by private consulting engineers, engaged in design • or sewer systems and other municipal facilities, subdivisions, commercial and Industrial building design, and general civil engineering work 1946- 1948 Croup supervisor In Design Department or Cnlifornla Division of IIIRhwnys In charge of group which designed first full • freeway section of San Bernnrdhw Freeway constructed to District VIII This was at the time the InrRcsf contract ever awarded In District VI I I Work Included the supporting work, approaches and coordination for 16 bridge structures and Interchanges Work also included design of extensive storm drain system to drain the depressed section Also prepared • drainage studies and reports for other projects 1948- 1951 City tingincer of Ontario, Californin Pesponsibie for proper design and construction of public improvements in the City of Ontario both by City forces and by private Interests In connection with subdivisions 1951 - 1955 • Partner, and then President of Associnied Fngincers, 316 East "E" Street, Ontario, California, engn Red in general civil englneering practice in Southern California Area. 1955 - Present C -1 Lester H. Noreen License: Land Surveyor License No 3002 - Stale of Cnllrornir. • Land Surveyor License No. 3959 - Stale of Nevnda Education: Two years Civil Engineering, Loa Angeles City College, Los Angeles, California Affiliation: Member of American Congress of Surveying 8 Mapping • Experience: Survey layout work at Camp Roberts, El Toro Marine Base, Basic Magnesium Plant, Las Vegas and various other sites. 1940-1942 Three years In United States Navy "Seabees" with 27 months • overseas duty as surveyor on airstrip and base construction South Pacific. 1942 - 1945 Three years transiiman - layoulman on various plant construction jobs In Southern California. 1945 - 1948 Loyola University, Los Angeles • Union Oil Company, Wilmington United States Gypsum Plant, South Cate Seven years as Survey Party Chief with State of California, Division or Ilighways, mapping g triangulation, property surveys R construction layout In connection with highway • construction In District VIII 1948- 1955 City Creek Highway Viclorville - Barstow Freeway Survey Party Chief, Associated Engineers. 1955 - 1959 • Partner In charge or all field Parties arJ survey work, Assecinted Engineers, 316 Enst "L "' Street, Ontario, California, engaged in general civil engineering and land surveying practice in the Souibarn California Area 1959 - Present A C -2 Donald A Julius Licenses: Civil Engineer Registration No 17599 - State of California Civil Engineer Registration No. 15672 - State of Ohio Education: It S in Civil Engineering - 1943 Washington State College (University), Pullman. Washington Experience: joined Ontario staff as Project Engineer. In October 1970. Extensive project management background and experience in the fields of Flood Control, Storm Drains, Streets and Iligh- ways. 5 Advanced Planner for the Engineering Department, City of Pomona. Prepared and maintained a city -wide Mosier Plan of Storm Drains Including the preparation and submission of !lend Issue Studies for the City under various Los Augcles County Flood Control District programs Made studies for e and participated In design of the Chino Creek Project, in- y� eluding that portion from Riverside Drive to Sop Antonio Channel (withir, San Bernardino County); Son Antonio Wash Channel: and performed the coordination work op the Thompson Cr.ea and San Jose Creek Channels, now both f constructed by the Corps of Engineers through Pomona lias a thorou in knowledge of Los Angeles County clood Control DIsD•kt and Corps of Engineers Standard,. and Practice, has utilized Los Angeles County Road Department Stnndnrds ns on South Campus Drive, Arrow Ihghsay and other protects. Completed a recent Associated Engineers project in the City of t.a Verne It volving Los Angeles County Float Con- trol District and th• Corps of Engineers with a drain to Live Oak Wash Channel. Prior to joining Assoelnled Engineers, prepared n Master Drainage Plan for an 850 acre residential development in the City of Son Diego. 46 Since Joining Associated Engineers, he has utilized San Bernardino County Flood Control District and San Derna Mino County Road Department design criteria and standards on the Chino Airport, on sulxlivisions, studies for Associated Rock Products, a major quarry operating plan for the Fllntkote Company. C -3 William L Smelser License: Civil Engineering Registration No 21104, State of California Education: U S In Civil Engineering, Untvc ^sity of Calif,nia, Berkeley Campus, 1966 Experience: Staff Engineer, Carnation Company, Los Angeles, Includes design of piping and pumping systems, equipment and structural layout, total plant operation studies, and perforation of capital exp. nditure reports 1966- 1968 Assistant Highway Engineer, District VIII, California Division of Ilighways. Includes total design of major freeway projects, horizontal nndvertical site planning of freeway bridge structures with multiple spans to 400 feel length - tunnel structure to 730 feet length - bridge widenings - embankment plans, traffic studies and signing, construction Inspection of major freeway Projects and smaller road projects, surveys, and planning studies. .968-1972 Assistant Illghway Engineer, Sacramento Bridge Depart- ment, California Division of Ilighways, includes analysis and structural design of glow freeway bridge - 150 feel span, enct -in -place prestressed box girder con- struction, [IS -20 -44 and alternative leading, steel reinforcing detailing, detall checking and quantity estimating of bridge structures. 1969 Engineering Design Supervisor, Associated pngincers, Ontario, California, presently engaged in general civil engineering practice Including planning, design , estimating, construction liaison of total subdivision projects, end mobilehome parks, drainage studies and rcl3t7d Improve- ment projects, general public Improvement project- encompassing streets, sewer and waterlines, drainage Ixnslns, well pump facilities, fire protection systems, and airports. C -4 Phllin !d. UouPlas License: Civil Engineer Registration No 23814 - Stale or California Education: Associate In Engineering- 1965 Vermont Technical College It.S In Civil Engineering - 1971 University of Vermont Currently enrolled In Masters of Public Administration Program California Stale University, Los Angeles Experience: Instrumenlman and Party Chief, Central Vermont Public Service Corporation, Rutland, Vermont Boundary and electrical utility surveying for Vermont's largest supplier of electrical power. 1965 -1969 + Designer - Plan Checker, Los Angeles Department of County Engineer Plan Check of private conlydct sewers, storm drains, i; grouing plans, drainage plans, hydrology studies and water surface calculalibns Design of County improvement sewers, storm drains, master plan i highways, county parks and recreation areas; flood hazard reports, review of Tract and Parcel Maps in for flood hazard and special drainage problems. € 1971 -1978 i Ll C -5 Enclosure "D" -. S q�u 9 L SCOPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES I Field investigation consisting of a minimum of 8 six inch diameter cores through the existing pavements and the basement soils to a maximum - • depth of 2 0 feet below the grading plane, in place, density tests, sampling of basement soils for laboratory testing, logging or each test hole, and a detailed examination o,* surface damage to the existing pavement. • I1 Laboratory testing consisting of maximum density- optimum and sture relations, sand equivalents and R- Values or the basement sells. No laboratory tests of the existing pavements are planned; hodever, cores will be retained for visual examination. • Ill. A report containing the results or the Held and laboratory investiga- tions, and recommendations for overlay thickness and /or structural sections for new construction • C] • e D -1