Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1982/03/03 - Agenda Packet
e •v ACTION AGENDA "p, a � Z On (3TY OF RANVQ-10 axAMoNM AFNIIA& Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California Wednesday, March 3, 1982 - 7:00 p.m. JRCk La.,1f 4Q q A22 Stems aubmltted for the City Connell A9snda must be In writing. ?be dead - Sine tar for thdse it Ss 5r00 p.m. on Shursday prior to the f4st and thl.-d Nednesday of each m th. !1» City Clerk's olfus retelses all such Stems. 1. CALL TO ORDER. 7 :05 p.m. _ A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Frost,A., Mikels_x_, Pal0mb0-3_, Bridge•, Schlosser. C. Approval of Minutes: February 17, 1982. Approved 5 -0 2. ANIIDUNCEMENTS. a. Tuesday. Marsh 9, 7:00 p.m. - Historical Preservation Commission - Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. b. WednE 'NY. March 10, 7:00 p.m. - Planning Commisf'on - Lion's Park Cow pity Lenter, 9161 Base Line Road. c. Tuesday, March 16, 7:00 p.m. - Etiwanda Specific Plan - Etiwanda Intermediate School, Community Room, 6925 Etiwanda Avenue. d. Wednesday, March i7, 7:00 p.m. - Chaffey College Founder's Day (Postponed) Celebration - Presentation of Proclamation by Mayor Schlosser. e. Tuesday, March 30, 7:00 p.m. - Etiwanda Town Meeting on Specific Plan - Etiwanda Intermediate School, 6925 Etiwanda Avenue. f. Wednesday, March 31, 7:30 p.m. - Chamber o" Commerce Candidates Forum - lNen's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Lire Road. g. Thursday, April 1, 7:15 p.m. dinner - Joint meeting of the Orange California niaCiti County, Belt Division of i discuss thePeriphialCanal the gAnaheimeCon- vention Center. z- x a' i' t I ANNOUNCEMENTS (continued) h. Coucilman Mfkels announced that 1246 Commission, which is composed of an elective official and executive director of each of the County transportation commissions in the SCAG region, have met informally at staff level, and a list of projects formally approved at the staff level has given a considerable weight to San Bernardino's projects. Cou cilmwn Mikels an mooted that I. At Spanbag meeting to ay, committee meeting was held to nominate members for the tAFC position that is being vacated. Meeting to select replacement will take place ten days after April 13th (April 23rd). Ne said any of the Councilmen could petition the Mayor to put their name up for consideration. J. Jim Robinson, Acting City Clerk, announced that Item S-C had been removed from the City Manager's Report. k. Mayor Schlosser announced their would be an executive session following the meeting 1 Councilman Bridge requested that Item •m' be pulled from consent calendar for discussion, since community concern had been expressed. M. Councilman Palombo requested that Item "b' be removed 'or discussion. -rr City Council Agenda -2- March 3, 1982 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. APPROVED 5 -0 rho :ol! owing Consent Calendar items are expected to bs routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the count" at one time without discussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -3 -3 for $311,952.30. Approved b. Authorization to Request Proposals for Design Services for .Approved Hellman and Foothill Signali&.,tiun and Drainage Improve- ments. It is recommended that Council authorize staff to request proposals for design services for signalization and drainage improvements at the intersection of Hellman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. c. Acceptance of Improvement and Maintenance Agreement for Approved Parcel Map 4511. It is recommended that Council accept the subject agreement for Parcel Map 4511 located en the south side of 9th Street, west of Archibald Avenue submitted by Sebastiano Filpi. RESOLUTION NO. 82-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR P.M. 4511 d. Release of Lien Agreement and Acceptance of Lien Agreement - _•-Apnrnved Stephen Butters - located at 9260 Mignonette Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 82-40 _gpprnved A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM STEPHEN BUTTERS. RESOLUTION NO. 82-41 Approved A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM STEPHEN BUTTERS AND AUTHORIZING r THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SANE. , e. Intent to Vacate Unnecessary Streets and Alleys within the _ Approveel - Victoria Project (Tract 11934). It is recommended that d Council declare its intention to vacate the unnecessary streets and ajleys and set date of April 7, 1982 for public hearing. I RESOLUTION NC. 82 -14 Approved A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY tm, OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE-OF•CALIFORNiA. DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ,-r t ,.r VACATE UNNECESSARY STREETS AND ALLEYS WITHIN ,THE VICTORIA PROJECT'AS HEREIN DESCRIBED. ��..Tr, ki �2ad�iY�au`FYf�`7P {; :;•:Y;Y�r.'�,a�:*��:!�:3iilCa - ,�..'t.."- d.'Layti 1 City Council Agenda -3- March 3, 1982 4��h'1 1� , yi` -Y.w v�l,•f V-..h_ I`r _ :� ♦..4y- V'•R f. Set public hearing date of March 17, 1982 for Tentative Approved Tract 11615 - PD 82 -02 = Lewis Properties. 9. Set public hearing date of March 17, 1982 for Community Approved Developmen• Block Grant Program for the purpose of deciding funding. h. Set public hearing date of March 17, 1982 for General Plan Approved ` Amendment 82 -OIA - Lewis. A request to amend the Land Use Policies of the General Plan that would allow the City to _ consider development plans within a Planned Community area, prior to adoption of the Planned Community. F" 1. Set public hearing date of March 17, 1982 for lienei-0 Plan Approved Amendment 82 -OIC - City of Rancho Cucamonga. A request to amend the Land Use Element of the General 'Plan to chanle the land use designation in the area fronting 4th Street cu- t ending approximately 1400' north between Etiwanda Avenu- and the ATdSF railroad tracks. This land use designate Approved 1s recommended to be changed from heavy industrial to _ general industrial. j Approval of a Loan to the Redevelopment Agency. Approved RESOLUTION NO. 82-42 — App=,,d A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LOAN TO THE RANCHO CUCANONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF $50,000. k. Intent to Vacate Oak Road, east of Amethyst Street and Approved west of Klusman - Leonard Tyko. Request that public hearing date to consider the subject vacation be set for April 7, 1982. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -43 Approved A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF o-' SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE OAK ROAD LOCATED EAST OF AMETHYST STREET AND HEST OF KLUSHAN AVENUE. (V -016). i. Authorization to Request Proposal for Materials Testing and Construction Surveys for Assessment District 79 -1. It is recomaended that Council authorize staff to request a proposals 'or the above referenced services. 4��h'1 1� , yi` -Y.w v�l,•f V-..h_ I`r _ :� ♦..4y- V'•R City Council Agenda -4- March 3, 1982 m. Agreement with R. C. Land Company Concerning Advance - -A"= =d and Reimbursement of Funds for Engiheering Work in Connection with Assessment District 79 -1. It is recommended that Council approve the agreement with R.C. Land Company and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to executo the same on the city's behalf. n. Authorization for Community Services Department to Attend Approved a One -day Emergency /Disaster Training Seminar. Recommendation: It is recommended that Council authorize three representatives from the Community Services Depart- ment to attend a one -day workshop in La Canada on March 19 on how to put on °Earthquake Preparedness Programs' for tha general public. Cost to be $1 ?5 per participant with funds charged against the Management Development Account. o. Alcoholic Beverage License - The Circle K Corporation No. approved 1029, 10110 Foothill Blvd. for off -sale beer b wine license. p. Release of Bonds and Notices of Completion: _ Aonrnved *Parcel Map 5803 - located on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Lemon Avenue. Owner: Hone and Assoc. Improvement Security (road) $86,000 *Parcel Map 4762 - located at 6th Street and Lucas Rancho Rnad. Owner: Westwards Properties Faithful Performance Bond (road) $86,000 *CUP 81 -04 - located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, south of Foothill Blvd. Owner* Vineyard National Bank. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $47,000 *Parcel Hap 4595 - located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Blvd. Owner: Crewell/Leventhal, Inc honumentation Bond $ 4,000 *D.R. 80 -39 - located at the southeast corner of Jersey and Utica. Owner: Robert Manufacturing Company. Certificate of Deposit $ 7,500 RESOLUTION NO. 82-46 Approved Wk i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWi.,A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE as L. STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL HAP 5803, PARCEL � J MAP 4:62, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -04, _- AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COM- PLETION FOR THE WORK. li!@ ."•�1y.•i7 :.:�'.('; .;S •.rl,•A `YS�n:. 4•.i?'Y. ?. i .r;`.Y3• , c ya i, a: L 1 City Council Agenda -5- 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. REVISION TO TITLE 10, VEHICLE AND-TRAFFIC� UN CIPAL CODE TO REFLECT CORRECTIONS IN WORDING AND INTENT D I E SPEED LIM11b UN W1Y_9TAffr= ORDINANCE NO. 169 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 10.04.070, 10.04.100, 10.20.010, 10.20.020, 10.40.010 A S B. 10.52.030, 10.52.040, 10.56.020 OF TITLE 10, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC. March 3, 1982 Approved Apnmvpd S -n B. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 82 -01 - An ordinance approv- Approved ng zoning Ordinance n snt 82-01 modifying Section 61.0219(b) of the Zoning Code providing for regulation of compact car and bicycle parking spaces. ORDINANCE NO. 172 (second reading) Apnn.vn,l s -n AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY with stipulation that OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING Parking will again ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 52 -01 MODIFYING be studied when SECTION 61.0219(b) OF THE ZONING CODE PRO- revised comprehensive VIDING FOR REGULATION OF COMPACT CAR AND zoning Ordinance is BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. prepared. C. AN ORDINANCE ABM.ISHING THE INDUSTRIAL LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA. It is recommended that Council approve Ordinance No. 112 -A revnking Ordinance No. 112 which abolishes the industrial local drainage area. ORDINANCE 110. 112 -A (first reading) Since this Ordinance is contingent on passer AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY of same motion OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ated below as Indicated Indic ORDINANCE NO. 112 ELIMINATING THE INDUSTRIAL would apply. LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA. D. AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING THE DRAINAGE FEE. It is recommended that Council approve Ordinance No. 75 -B increasing drainage fees from $2,500 per acre to $4,600 per acre. ORDINANCE N0. 75 -B (first re :ding) Motinn: Moved by Mikels secondt:4 by-Frvst to AN ORD110XCE Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY table ordinance pending OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING study sessions between CHAPTER 13.09 OE THE MUNICIPAL COOL: F.ELATtVE TO City staff and various COMPREHENSIVE STORM DRAIN PLAN AN7 ORAIRA E FEES. private interests: and d1.., bring Deck befora%ounci �,.f.,_; s;•_ „, __ __ -, _ ,::' _ when appropriate':?5 =0',y City Council Agenda -6- March 3, 1982 E. ORDERING A.YNEXATI9 10. 8 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Approve 5 -0 R 7 CTS 9 4 60�• D D[RE OR RE IE 8�� It is recommended that Council order the annexation of the subject projects to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NINER 8 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT WEER 1 FOR TRACTS 9441, 11609, AND DIRECTOR REVIEW 80 -34. F. ALTA LOMA CHANNEL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. Consideration of a petition to establish an Assessment District for portions of the Alta Loma Channel. RESOLUTION NO. 82-4., A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING FIND- INGS ON PETITION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -2 ALTA LOMA FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL. S. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. Approved 5 -0 Moved by Bridge, second st to accept petition and begin process. 5 -0. Approved 5 -0 A. AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD SURVEY AND MAP CONTRACT FOR THE Approved 4 -0-1 RERITAGE PARK. Staff report y o ley. (Councilman Frost stepped Recommendation: It is recommended that contract be awarded down from Council seat) to L. D. King, Inc., not to exceed $3,560 for the surveying of Heritage Park. B. AUTHORIZATION TO RENT /LEASE HOUSE ON ARROW PARK. SITE. Approved 5 -0 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Community Ser- vices Department be authorized to manage the Arrow Park property and rent or lease the house located on the pro- perty until park development occurs. C. HEIUIOSA GROVES PARK. An oral report by Bill Holley. ReiAoved 0. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH LESNEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR - -%iPP, H 11 E E. units on t e nort— w6 est corner of iaver.- Avenues. i City Council Agenda -7- March 3, 1982 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 7. ADJOURNMENT. * Adjourned to Executive Session at 11:00 p.m, to reconvene to City ;•. Council meeting. Reconvened City Council meeting at 11:20 p.m. and The meeting atA a�ourh °t�e.�e�lde�f8p&tt)A %hcy Meeting. t Y REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA March 3, 1982 Y t I+ � L 1. CALL TO ORDER. a. Roll Call Frost x , Mtkels x Palombox. Bridgex, Schlosser_,_. b. Approval of Mi..utes: February 17, 1982. Approved 5-0. 2. STAFF REPORTS. A. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WM CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER Approved W th DISTRICT. deletion of "along wit Interest earned'. 5 -0 B. APPROVAL OF AMENDED AGREEMENT WITH CUCAMONGA COUNTY Apprnve.l ae amended Meru 5 -0 t C AUTHORIZATION TO GRANT TIME EXTENSION. _Approved eviellsion It I. recommended that a 30 day extension of the statute to Aprit 7th City 5 u nc17 Fleeting. of limitations with the Foothill Fire Prevention District D be granted. 3. ADJOURNMENT. heeting Adjourned at 11:45 p.m. to executive ,ession not to reconvene. _ _ +ter. -• -G. aW�5: 4'. �iYF- "- ?C'%r./•'..�`�i•l� ?YK`:^'�Yi: tl+�?. Y. �• �. t•FC�•.- T�,ttr`�' tY _ _ +ter. -• -G. aW�5: 4'. �iYF- "- ?C'%r./•'..�`�i•l� ?YK`:^'�Yi: tl+�?. Y. �• �. t•FC�•.- T�,ttr`�' 1 a u tsn i •Y• �• f .1. Y • Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California Wednesday, March 3, 1982 - 7 00 p.m. All Stems submitted for the 1ty Council Agenda amt be in writing. The dmad- line for submittiny these items is 5900 P.M. on Thursday Prior to the first and third Nednesday of each math. The City clerk'a Offiee receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. - A. Plcdle of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Frost , Mikels_, Palambo_, Bridge_, Schlosser C. Approval of Minutes: February 17, 1982. r AtMOORCEMEHTS. a. Tuesday. March 9, 7:00 p.m. - Historical Preservation Commission - Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. b. Wednesday, March 10, 7:00 p.m. - Planning Commission - Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. c. Tuesday, March 16, 7:00 p.m. - Etiwanda Specific Plan - Etiwanda Intermediate School, Community Room, 6925 Etiwanda Avenue. d. Wednesday, March 17 1:-! .m. - Chaffey College Founder's Day Celebration - Presental.r Yf Proclamation by Mayor Schlosser. e. Tuesday, March 30, 7:30 p.m. - Etiwanda Town Meeting on Specific Plan - Etiwanda Intermediate School, 6925 Etiwanda Avenue. f. Wednesday, Harch 31, 7:30 p.m. - Chamber of Commerce Candidates Forum - Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. g. Thursday, April 1, 7:15 p.m. dinner - Joint meeting of the Orange County, L.A. County, and Citrus Belt Division of the League of California Cities to discuss the Perlphial Canal - Anaheim Ccn- vention Center. It f ;i r 'r t� Lq •J. City Council Agenda _2- March 3, 1982 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. TM toilwing cauent Calendar iteas are earoctod to be routine and noa- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one tlmo without dlacw0lon a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -3 -3 for $311,962.30. 1 b. Authorization to Request Proposals for Design Services for _d Hallman and Foothill Signalization and Drains a Improve- ments It is recommended that Council authorize staff to request proposals Yor design services for signalization and drainage improvemrnts at the intersection of Hellman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. c Acceptance of Improvement and !Maintenance Agreement for 5 Parcel Map 4511 It is recommended that Council accept the subject agreement for Parcel Map 4511 located on the south side of 'ith Street, west of Archibald Avenue submitted by Sebastiano Filpi RESOLUTION NO. 8247 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR P.M. 4511 d Release of Lien Agreement and Acceptance of Lien Agreement - 9 Stephen Butters - located at 9260 Mignonette Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -40 10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM STEPHEN BUTTERS. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM STEPHEN BUTTERS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. e. Intent to Vacate Unnecessary Streets and Alleys within the Victoria Project (Tract 11934). It is rectamended that Council declare its intention to vacate the unnecessary streets and alleys and set date of April 7, 1982 for public hearing. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -14 A RESOLUTION OF..THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C'JCANONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF`CALIFORNiA; DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO yz •• v • ; I s��VACATE UNNECESSARY STREETS AND ALLEYS WITLIN rtM *A�'�.r 1t �� �THE•VI(.7ORIA PROJECT AS HEREIN DESCRIBED. 11 17 b, 18 1 City Council Agenda -3- March 3, 1982 f. Set public hearing date of March 17, 1982 for Tentative Tract 11615 - PD 82.02 - Lewis Froparties. g. Set public hearing date of March 17, 1982 for Commrunity Development Block Grant Program for the purpose of deciding funding. h. Set public hearing date of March 17, 1982 for General Plan Amendment 82 -OIA - Lewis. A request to amend the Land Ute Policies of the General Plan that would allow the City to consider development plans within a Planned Coin unity area, prior to adoption of the Planned Community. 1. Set public hearing date of March 17, 1982 for General Plan Amendment 82 -OIC - City of Rancho Cucamonga. A request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan to change the land use designation in the area fronting 4th Street ex- tending approximately 1400' north between Etiwanda Avenue and the A15SF railroad tracks This land roe designation _ is recommended to be changed from heavy industrial to general industrial. J. Approval of a Loan to the Redavelopment Agency. 21 RESOLUTION NO. 82-42 22 A RESOLUTION CF THE CITY CCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING A LOAN TO r.:E RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT r.GENCY OF $50,DOO. k. intent to Vacate 0sk Road, east of Amethyst Street anJ 23 west of Klusman - Leonard Tyko. Request that public hearing date to consider the subject vacation be set for April 7, 1982. RESOLUTION 110. 82-43 24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMIViGA. CALIFORNIA. COUNTY CF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE OAK ROAD LOCATED EAST OF AMETHYST STREET AND NEST OF KLUSHAN AVENUE. (V -016). 1, Authorization to Request Proposal for Materials Testing 29 and Construction Surveys for Assessment District 79 -1. It is recommended that Council authorize staff to request proposals for the above referenced services. • O City Council Anenda 4- March 3, 1982 m. Agreement with R. C Land Company Concerning Advance 30 and Reimbursement of Funds for Engineering Mork in Connection with Assessment District 79 -1. It is recommended that Council approve the agreement with R.C. Land Company and authorize the Mayor aid City Clerk to execute the smut on the city's behalf. n. Authorization i'or Comnity Services Department to Attend 39 a One -day Emertmncy /Disaster Trrining Seminar. Recommendation It is recommended that Council authorize three represem•:atives from the Community Services Depart- ment to auend a one -dal workshop in La Canada on March 19 on how to put on "Earthquake Preparedness Programem for the general public. Cost to be $125 per participant with funds charged against the Management Development Account. o Alcoholic Beverage License - The .:ircle K Corporation No. 40 1029, 10110 Foothill Blvd, for off -sale beer 8 wine license. p. Release of Bonds an9 Notices of Completion: 41 *Parcel Map 5803 - located of the southwest cornei 3f Haven Avenue and Lemon Avenue. Owner: Hone and Ascoc. Improvement Security (road) $86,000 *Parcel Map 4762 - located at 6th Street and Lucas Rancho Road. Owner: Westwards Properties Faithful Performance Bond (road) $06,000 *CUP 81 -04 - located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue south of Foothill Blvd. Omer: Vineyard National Bank. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $47,000 *Parcel Pap 4595 - located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Blvd. Owner: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Monumentation Bond f 4,000 *D.R. 80 -39 - located at the southeast corner of derrey and Uti•,a. Owner: Robert Manufacturing Company. Certificate of Deposit $ 7,500 RESOLUTION NO. 8246 43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL f;• THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ` STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 5803. PARCEL „ YAP 4762,: AND, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -04. ^s AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF CON- !: PLETI( -�)R THE WORK. :.\. ' a; { City Council Agenda -5- larch 3, 1982 4. P IC HEARINGS. A. REVISION TO TiTLE 10,&YE1�CL,[iE,� A�NO TRAFFIC OF THE NTi7lhtcll AL cODWY�4U G IN D ifN Fhb 1S D 5 ON CITY STREETS. ORDINANCE NO. 169 (second reading) 47 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 10.04.070, 10. 04.100. 10.20.010, 10.20.020, 10 40.010 A 6 B, 10.52 030, 10.52.040, 10.56.020 OF TITLE 10, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC. B. ZONING ORDIRIMC AMENONENT N0. 82 -OS - An ordinance approv- ng an ng nance nt - modifying Sectici 61.0219(6) of the Zoning Code providing for regulation of compact car and bicycle parking spaces. ORDINANCE NO. 172 (second reading) 50 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY S OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE;.ANENOIREtiI 82. 1 MODIFYING SECTION 61.0219L(bbt) Of TIIE ZONING CODE ^RO- VIDING FOR REGU ION OF COMPACT CAR AND BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. AN ORDINANCE ABOLISHING THE INDUSTRIAL LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA. 51 It is recevrxended that Council approve Ordinance No. 112 -A revoking Ordinance No. 112 which abolishes the industrial local drainage area ORDINANCE NO 112 -A (first reading) 52 AN ORDINANNCE OF THE LITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA IGA. CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 112 ELIMINATING THE INDUSTRIAL LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA. iN ORDINANCE MODIFYING THE DRAINAGE FEE. 53 It Is recommended that Council approve Ordinance Ho. 75 -B increasing drainage fees from $2,500 per acre to $4.600 per acre. ORDINANCE NO. 75 -8 (first reading) S4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. A1sHOING Tp CHAPTER 13.09 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELAIIYE EE COMPREHENSIVE STOM DRAIN PLAN AND DRA1tNiAAGGEE F S. City Council Agenda -6- March 3, 1982 E. ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO LANDSCAPE RAINTEHAYCE DISTRICT 59 CTS 0. D I E I It is recommended that Council order the annexation of the subject projects to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 82-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN cOtiNECT10N WITH ANNEXATION NUMBER 8 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR TRACTS 9441, 11609, AND DIRECTOR REVIEW 80 -34. F ALTA LOMA CHANNEL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. Consideration of a petition to establish an Assessment District for portions of the Alta Lana Channel. RESOLUTION NO. 8245 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING FIND- INGS ON PETITION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1:0. 82 -2 ALTA LOMA FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL. 59 69 71 S. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. AUTHORIZATION TO ANARD SLNiL AND MAP CONTRACT FOR THE 84 HERI N to report y o ey. Reconmendation: It is recommended that contract be awarded to L. D. King, Inc., not to exceed $3,560 for the surveying of Heritage Park. B AUTHORIZATION TO RENT /LEASE HOUSE ON ARROW PARK SITE. J 89 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Community Ser- vices Department be authorized to manage the Arrow Park property and rent or lease the house located on the pro- perty until park development occurs. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH LESHEY DEVELOPMENT COt4PANY FOR 91 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 80- units on tie nort west corner of emon and aven v s. City Council Agenda -7- '. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. tt; 7. ADJOURNMENT. The meeting to adjourn to a Redevelopment Agency Meetin3• Y: T� a i' i; y March 3. 1982 „ � A • • --=-----=- • • r - • • - - • • • • • • ; • • • • : • • -= - - - -- - - - -- -_ - - -- - - -- i. NOOFl .O 100MOMOOhNO ♦rOY\OOO IOONOOO�OOPO+ 000PONO • . -r00 ..p :00NpO1�.NOd pM YIPOOAhOOPPOd C: 700rV.�0 .9 .................................. _^ =0 yy O �+ .•OP<PNOh ♦INppIrM. W.NINWnY.MhpNPpM � . OOOddId ..OIM'1MNV♦.1.NFr,dN1..11 OOrNV INp.i.00POppN�OpNFO.\ � ♦MIIrr1 NYVMIPN� NMpI V.I..gPIlI1 N.Y.FMd� .L IVN ..0.. I.YFMYNNINp�Iri II ♦ � O..'hM'I rlyd p M .r1 ON Y, MCI. p000ON0♦ PO'I. O+ OOOOOYiMFrfNI. 1IM1.. pPO... MPPO +N•\Oa= LrONOfN1.+0}OONN ♦Opw.pV ♦+ \OOPO MOt- �rO..PNMNpOOrFM Vn)d ♦Yr.....Wgrn.r..NNPPPPPPO ^.Ndp- .�Y.fY.PON000pFONPYPOdOn NO�J' SOOON^•, MONn11POOF1 /.Orrrr..r...rr.rrrrwrry MnMMOIY Od YN._i V POMITY.ddFO IY1.. >TP >OV OOpOO�. �. W.^. r...rrMVM1.NINVIWN/yMMYHMN1VNry1W N.Y>N�\NM.IWN.WI1/.Iy�11 ♦ ♦'�11 r 5�r � �• � �7 (• ,t (t t �t 1 1• 1 ,1 1 CI Q • • • 0 N W u a 04m00aeeenoeppeeopoeeeoNNeNOpeppeNaorreovNNn2oNN roos.WneweoaaNNNOO rw enPnPMNwOO4POOgPOO d)oo YOV {POrP:ON�a nO.... MP O...NNnP ro1rOP1an. ION Yr tian2Aerwalr= >oeioi<erio %o e+eafeelorl +innr±wlnarI Po�n.oririeiniP�ni+r =l+e ierve W NY 01NFr NOP�1'IN IPrDrrq��Y�IMPNNNr1Y�NOhg rP O01F�'�M•'IN ge NO �nN�n ggOOf NO DNOI 2 N Fro TIN rrrn rMY N ��� Y q�5w NJr IMr VaV PM rNO M � 1MN: r n r r NN N n r r N r ,.I ri ON a \ O O n O F + .yW J .6 r b U Yi a �V W Z `Z 6 f 2 W1 O rt b O4W +N OU W3 OO V = r Td0 N w,N i o "r. Vim= NV i N Y l`� 4f 5 NN <� a f t 6 p� W Nur Of • 4 W J 2 nrN ¢ AW N J tY WNi ;x 555522- Y >OOWY N V Wi! N N .9` V t �� OM)r WOY�y 2 N wIWS y �W S aW � 6YY 1/ Y ¢W; + ;Vr�li� y6PP 6 Y LK WNer a + Z ♦ 1NI Yf + OL \19 J Or \i U ♦6rVrf 7 2ln rLLIL N rtlWw 6 = 4 2 Yr rords `3 YS }r z� �r i��J >♦W�WOZVYSYr WFgA -+ �W FA.�WS -.•S 7Nn 1yy 50VV� - Z STftf �YfM.- W p {Jf U4Ka}.� JJ HFw y.Y 3 Y x Oa Or; Zw YJNVJa¢rLL�N rU VLLar 6Y lf7 rO2nt ++ L OuJJII jixt V +Y U X16= l LLU+ jLLJW 44+Z5JT •¢O)'�WO�WS {NV+1W> 6V •x ?• Op WFN yWw w rOi ♦C rr) i� O > YF= � rJ •tY„ O�(djtlN V {YLl aW WAN }lf piS iNi:pOY7W { N61¢N+ }N �y OVNWY N e i WJw J YJwJ WI YaL2 SOU - -{ Y <CO { yNWrN T _V r4F r pYGGlr♦rCW a 5•+ 4 • 1 U f_i_Y¢ianWWZW{ Y1Z♦ OV W LL e W Y —2 w G 4ZN oa Y 4VOq J � tf1VSW NLY p4 rL, f.nLL+ N �6w LL 4 O { ON J'YwN64 Oiii+ JN +rV�L Ar+ OW JwT >NO{�Y♦i nwfwsw5 +w > }iy JVOYJ5Y5 i > JrJASOSrWOar rUNO ; iw YJNfrtNrrti a0: itl2WW 9r + ♦rir.�rWijN Sr�r 5Z5 t 4�ypJ�gw�ixJnfaaW4o5 ``J�cq}�tWWL•� +r+rzp4{fr+fuw -q +» araagf sr •i uW r` 6 ZZSS YI(Y JJJJJL�i iLiYS240 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦i \ ♦ ♦Zf ♦262 �YM NNN NYww�OY� »ix r� 2�q�1 LL q � wO tiO N.INgO OV10rh OrnrONNrONONO wFMN000I�hNOM9q PNr000'I�PII�IIM aS <nO0000Nr�¢OO A'Y1 u v wwrr � oaaue��.�uhf- r= .�nrT +nnrioraa �rw.° I�wopilp 4�r°-. �n�. MOra�nM +wNn °Owaa000l�ivpyTCV'a.4in > > e11vN�nNNYf o. loaaallhr-+ Frhh1. nhhl. rW. nlhhw5aggg4rPAaqi >agaaggqqMPVpppw >PF.�q r V i f/•perry•IIV..rw200rN NINOhgpOrNN+I IONgOO WIMII MhOpOrryn+,IOFYPOrNM Y�^hgP0+1'IM NNMq _ { OIOPOOOOOOOOCOtir +rr rr�IryµW, SN,NNNnMM•nINNN.I.rlrrr1111NN5! NNNOd +0001tN.11.11 3 N�NNnMMNM n1NMnI1MnMMMM tiIM \nMYI1NwMNn1^NIN MnN•V�NnMMMM"iMnAAAa pP ppO JPOOOPPTOPOOPPPO> POOOpOP OPT PP pP ITPPP PPPTpD P PPpP JO P { OOOSSOO4OO404p444g40044aOSO444g4 »�Z agoo�go4P�°aoe000�400000goS ao00oo0 0 '� c c c t r� �! •+ s s s a • e a •'�s R s a Y- 4 F ! 1 1 t� • fl i7 ,f n it �) _r I� n �� �� I A 0eo =.00=00000 0000000000000000000. -. i ^: n& &rte o 0 oftftOn°Orw0ve0wrNpwwO wb o i J 0 0 _ � n i a J F1 G n Y W �W sLyY (Y Y 'W W �( 3 iwww�tiw. «n..r.ww.uvlvn�wa Y E t O O L Y Y leow llCNnMOr�00wnO+Iw �Ow}wwYV�eCnnl00/M+f r1 f\ acc SS°oo'3Y,bSof$a°O0w °oSoo °838 '- t Ian' • 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C17cw STAFF REPORT DATE: March 3, 1982 TOs City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: John Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Authorization to Request Proposals for Design Services for Hellman i Foothill Signals and Drainage Improvements As a follow -up to the selection of Capital Improvement Projects, the Engineering Division would like to request approval to seek design services for the Development of Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the reconstruction and signalization of the inter- - section of Hellman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. For this project, tho Engineering Division will select three to five Eng- neering Consulting firms capable of performinq the work requirements and request proposals. These proposals will be re- viewed and one firm selected for recommendation to the City Council for award of contract. -Criteria for selection includes: 1. Ability to perform the described work. 2. Projected schedules for completion. 3. Cost of services. Firms selected to propose will be primarily locally bdaed Engineering firms which have demonstrated capabilities and are able to work well with the Engineering Staff At the time of award of these contracts, funds will be allocated to cover the cost of those services. Preparation of design plans is the first step in the early construc- tion of these valuable projects and should start as soon as possible. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council authorize Staff to request proposals for the reconstruction and signalization of the intersection of Hellman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. tfully suW3itted, ' � l A0 .l it lT • i CPPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATES March 3, 1982 0L. TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara xrall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvement and Maintenance Agreement for Parcel Map 4511 -Mr. Sebastian Filpi is submitting the attached Maintenance Agreement guaranteeing maintenance of the temporary retarding basin on his prnperty for City Council approval. This agreement will remain in force until such time as the re- quired Master Planned Storm Drain is completed. A $2.000 security has been posted as a guarantee. RECO.yMENDATION It is recommended that City Council ado;t the attached resolution accepting said Improvement and M3intenarnco Contract authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign lama and direct the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernar- dino, California. Rea etf�y sulmit�te�d, LBH: q,� as Attachment S :y M; t;. Y • ib N' ■ RESOLUTION NO. 12-47 A RESOLUTION OP'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF !:ANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING nPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 4511 mss- e WHEREAS, a temporary reta -ding basin was constructed on Parcel 6 of Parcel Map 4511; and WHEREAS, execution of this agreement and posting of maintanance security by Sebastian Pilpi, developer of Parcel Map 4511, are deemed sufficient to guarantee continual mainta- nanca if said basin. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California said Improvement and Mainteiance Agreement and said improwement security by said developer be and the same are hereby accepted and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and d1rects the City Clark to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino- County, California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 1982. AYES: NOBS: ABSENT: ATTEST: wren M Wasserman, —TCiry .0 e rk- Phillip �Si . Schloemer, Mayor "'d y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ IHPROvEMENr AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 4511 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That tnis agreement is made and entered Into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as City, by and between said City and Sebastian Filipi hereinafter referred to as the Developer ' - • WITIIESSETH:' , THAT WHEREAS, a temporary retarding basin shall be constructed within Parcel 6 of Parcel Map No. 4511, being an Improvement Requirement of said City for said Parcel Nap No. 4511; and, WHEREAS, the Developer shall own and maintain said retarding basin until such time as the Downstream Master Planned Storm Drain System is completed, and accepted by said City; and, WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of maintenance security, as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be sufficient to guarantee continual maintenance of said Basin. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer agrees to construct at Developers expense said retarding basin within nine (9) months frza the date hereof. . 2. The Developer agrees to maintain the retarding basin, to the satisfaction of the City, at no expense to the City. 3. If after 30 days following notification by City of deficient maintenance, the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause work to be done by any lat;ful _ means, and thereupon to use the hereinafter stated cash security and /or to recoser from said Developer the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. Developer shall be billed for said costs and shall make restitution to City within thrity (30) days of date of billing, and /or replace said cash securities used, should Developer fail to make said restitution, within the time alloted, then the City will cause a lein to be filed, against said Parcel S. for said restitution plus any and ail reasonable attorney fees. 4. This agreement shall remain in full force and effect from the date hereof until notice by City that required construction of a Downstream Master Planned Strom Drain sewer is completed and accepted for maintenance by said City. At that time said maintenance security shall be returned to Developer t • 1 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ` DATE: March 1, 1982 0'I "w On TO: City CO•.1ntil and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BYZ Barbara Aral!, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Release of Lien Agreement and Acceptance of Lien Agreement - Stephen Butters - located at 9260 Mignonette Avenue Mr. Butters has requebted release o:' the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lion Agreement accepted by the City Council on August 22, 1981 for financing purposes. - A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement hai been submitted by Hr. Butters to replace the original and in attached for your approval. It is recommended that City Council rdopt the attached resolutions authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the release of Lien Agreement and Real Property Improvament Contract and Lien Agreement. Respectfully submitted, --CV1V �f i LBH:Bj Jaa Attachments :, t W b , G P S. The maintenance security is to be tarnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terns of this agreement and shall be subject to approval by the City .n security shall principal o beess than said ' Maintenance Security Submitted: Total Cash $2,000 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents .`. to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures: DEVELOPER Dy _ Date Witness Date Z- CITY OF RANCHO C11CAHtoxm, CALIFORNIA .� A HJNICIPAL CORPORATION By Approvxd as • Phi I I 1P 0 St osser, Mayor foam C ty Attorney Attest Date auren asserman, City Clerk 5 r k k i t s S� `fe ,1 1 . . -.. - ._ ,mss.,,_ .. -. _ -._s;- 7`7:;x•,+ -,•1� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY Ih- PROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM STEPHEN -BUTTERS (9260 M10nonette) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 81 -123 accepting a Real .Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Stephen Butters; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in official records of San Bernardino County, California on September 3, 1981, as document No. 81- 196648; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does hereby release said Real Property Improve- ment Contract and Lien Agreement and that City Clerk shall cause this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phi 111p 0. Schlosser-7gy—OF ATTEST Lauren M Wasserman, City Clerk OWN" •1 i 2 p,. S 4 C: r, RESOLUTION NO. % J -y I " A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCUNCIL OF,THE CITI OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ACCEPTING A REkL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM -STEPHEN BUTTERS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO S GN TYE SAME (9260 Mignonette) WHEREAS, the,Clty Cuuncil of the Citiy.of Rancho Cucamonga _ f adopted Resolutior. No. 80 -38 of May 7, 1180, to establish requirements for landlocked parcels ubere no subdivisl:,, is occurring; end, WHEREAS. Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 316^ is recorded in Book 30, Page 95 of Parcel Maps official rec:rds of Countt,,^ of San Bernardiim. State of California, 1s a landlocked Para t ttttht; the waning of said Resolution No. 80-38; and WHEREAS, Stephen Butters has exe:uted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, a copy of which is attach,d hereto and Incorporated herein by reference. - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that ttv. city Cotncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California dorr accept said Real Property improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authurixes the NAIr and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Cierk to recor: same in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 190 AYES. HOES: ABSENT: Phillip 0. Schlossor. Mayor ATTEST: auren Wasserman, City er xi F *��>�:�`[��>.�M1..i Mali #'x"��c._� • -• .)�„M_'y.i 7 9250 MIGNONETTE ST 6� Tl OF lt,1\C!.Io CI:G\ \I( ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY AIAP . ,. os V I MONTL -1 ,.q4T A c Nx ' RLCOADIR& FRWC9TLD BY and • Mlmt RLGGADCD MAIL lOr - CIYY CLM ' CITY Or RAMMO CUM- -PONGA 9120-C Base LLnv Rued - Not Office Bon 107 Rancho Cocenoaga, California 91715 Meat PROPL'M IMIROVO@T COMTRACf AMD•LIEM AGRJZ P (9260 mignunette) THIS AG3Crim1T, suds sad entered into this day of 1992, by and between mow P. Butters, Stephen L, Butters, Ruth M, Daugherty and Bermrd C, Daugherty (hereinafter referred m as •Developer '.), and the CM u RAM®0 COCAM0M4A, CALIPOPMLI, i a aanlcipel c<ryoratice ( hereinaftw referred to as 'City), provides as follwas Y.y MAMAS. as a general condition precedent to tL Issuance of • a building peralt for residential davalopsent, the City requlraa the CQmtroCtlon of Missing off -sloe attest lnpiweMents, Iteluding curb, ,i Sutter. sidewalk and pevasent, adjacent to the property m be de- Volopedr and MMV.CA.9, the Denloper desires to postpone conatraotioa of Such lmprovenents until a later date. Sa determined by the City, and WMM M. the City is agreeable to such postponsaent pmvlded that the Developer entars Into this Agreeme0t requiring the aewlol•er W construct said Imyrovmeats, at m esyame to the City, aftar� '- dawDd to do ao by the City, which Said Agresmsnt Sball also prov;dr _ that the City May tons" t Said lwprovaaents It the Developer fails - i or neglects to do so and that the City shall have a lieu upon as Mal property hereinafter described as asouCIty for the Developer'o Barra" v. reuse. and .oY npeyeent dun ^.lty. ' r. I'lfr. T1ICAL70RR. ZBL PARTICS AGRldt - - t" 1. The Developer hereby agrees that they Will In9tell off -•:';` i1 site Street improverenta, Including curb4 guttere sidewalk•, and psveunt,C •;' in accordance and eespllawo with all applicable ordlwxea. resolutloes,J: i `111• roles and re;ulatloac of the City In effect at the time of thi IusuIA4tio, �,. Said imprevesentn shall be Installed upon and along Mturonett. rein —t;_t ° w 7te �F` adjacent to DS tserlbad ) wlewc'a pmwrw hereinafter d 7 o .1, I �`i. i 9260 MIGNONETTE ST. --� 0 21 AC, MIL C 3, 4� S AC 1.03 AC U/L ` 2 ; &24 AC .O t 0 39 3 P�ONTG Y17iiA_ti f S�r ^Yi�b CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMO \GA ENCINEExtxc DIVISION T + NOTICE Or Bft-ASE OP LIM Let Maine be given that the City of Macho Cumaxaga hereby releases its lien which it had "mW to be recorded on the land haveimftar More fully described. Mid lien having been placed thereon by the recording of a contract betvean the Caty of Macho Cocamege and .1baa r_ llorl. atrohen L. Buttes, Path O. Dauabesty and Uarnard datedeyh4n 7e. ]991 MA recorded anew jgPtember ]. 1991 - an Dacment no. 8I- 196E+0 Recerded in Off.eial Records, Dan Bernardino County, State of California The description of the land is as follower • Panel I of Parcel Bap 7309 as recorded in Sock 70 Pave 95 of Panel Maps official records of said County (APB 707- 091 -51) STATE Or CALIrOApIA ) ) as COOM'r( Or SAO BZMUMIMO ) 13 CtTr Or 9AaCSO CUCAMOSG. CALI ORSEA, a Municipal corporation By, —Ff L TFL- LREb33EF- Mayor on St before Ma. the u era qoa— ifotarfry— Public In and for said State. persoMily appeared Phillip 0r Schicner, know to " W be the Mayor of the City of Rancho CLUnonga. `+ California. a satnidipal Corporation that `- executed the vithln IMtruseat. known W me to he the person wtO MMutad the N. .1thin lnetc NMnt, on behalf of Mid. waiciAl corporation. the,.,. .uvd. ]� a and acknwiedged to M that such watci- t ` pal Corporation Macoted the same -. q vi S coy hand And Official wt ^t ;{ B1.Or OPDIMO OCSTID By am WHEN KCVBOto MAIL Tot CIYT CLEM CITr Or BAdCeO CPWDMG 9770 -C Bass Lice road t:• Post Office Des 807 Macho Cucrmogap California 91730 NOTICE Or Bft-ASE OP LIM Let Maine be given that the City of Macho Cumaxaga hereby releases its lien which it had "mW to be recorded on the land haveimftar More fully described. Mid lien having been placed thereon by the recording of a contract betvean the Caty of Macho Cocamege and .1baa r_ llorl. atrohen L. Buttes, Path O. Dauabesty and Uarnard datedeyh4n 7e. ]991 MA recorded anew jgPtember ]. 1991 - an Dacment no. 8I- 196E+0 Recerded in Off.eial Records, Dan Bernardino County, State of California The description of the land is as follower • Panel I of Parcel Bap 7309 as recorded in Sock 70 Pave 95 of Panel Maps official records of said County (APB 707- 091 -51) STATE Or CALIrOApIA ) ) as COOM'r( Or SAO BZMUMIMO ) 13 CtTr Or 9AaCSO CUCAMOSG. CALI ORSEA, a Municipal corporation By, —Ff L TFL- LREb33EF- Mayor on St before Ma. the u era qoa— ifotarfry— Public In and for said State. persoMily appeared Phillip 0r Schicner, know to " W be the Mayor of the City of Rancho CLUnonga. `+ California. a satnidipal Corporation that `- executed the vithln IMtruseat. known W me to he the person wtO MMutad the N. .1thin lnetc NMnt, on behalf of Mid. waiciAl corporation. the,.,. .uvd. ]� a and acknwiedged to M that such watci- t ` pal Corporation Macoted the same -. q vi S coy hand And Official RECOROIIIO REOMTW By and ' WHEN RECORDED NAIL 701 CITY CLEAR CITY OR RAN= CDaJEnCA 9770 -C base Line Road ' Post Office BOX 107 Rancho Curamngal Callfernia 91710 REAL P"PZM IMVROVEMM CONTRACT AM-LIM ACIROtQf} ' (9760 lllgoonattsl .. THIS ACATYlRLR7, Wd@ aM entered Into this __ day of . 1917, by and between Mona R. Butters, graph" l� L. Butters, Ruth 0. Daugherty and Bernard C. Daugherty (herainalGr referred to as •Developerel, and the CITY OF RARCHO COCAPOatiA, CALIPORRIA, a soniciPAl Corporation (hereinafter referred to as •City,,, prnvLdes as follows, WHEREAS, as A general condition precedent te In, issuance of A building Permit for residential de"lopeeate the City requires the ron•trnctlnn of missing off -site street ityzovenaG, including ourb, gutter, sidewalk and pevanent, adjacent to the proper - to be de- velopadl and - BBRRrA9, the Developer desires W postpone Construction of such ioProven"G until a later data, as determined by the City, and ' WHEREAS- the City is agreeable to such POStPonement PrOwlded that the Developer enters Into this Agraeman, requiring the Developer to Construct said loprovemente, at nc expense to the City, after • __ ±i. demand to do " by the City. which Said Agreameat stulI also provide ' that the City ay construct said L.ptavaenG if the Developer falls or neglents to do so and that the City shall have a lion upon the real -� Property MGineftec described as security for the avel open's perfar- ounce, and any ";4yment due City. ' ;1 NON, THEREFORE, TRZ PARTIES ACREEt ;1 -• The aJClepel hereby agrees that toy will install Off- ; site strut Impcovaments, Including curb, gutters sidewalk, and pevement. e - In aCCOrdance and compliance with all applicable ordinances,' resolutloni, [) *,t11� rules and regulations of the City in effect at the ties of the Ins Gllat(m Said (mproveeeaG Shall be (nstallod upon and along HISnonette utreet, adlatent to avelnwr'a/ A ! fter described Y -� e��ip.i IProperty - -` e�� !' .., � • -" "pia -r• P r_ �e „ 2, The installatio1 of said iryrovcnta mall be cogle* -r c not later than one 11) yacr following Witten notice to the Dtvefopes from the City to comanoe instal+ation of the sent. Ie$tallatiom of said S.preveaents @hall be at no expense to the City, I Io the event the Developer fails or refuse$ to couplets the installation of said isprovmnt& in a tiaely manger, City my at , any tic, thermStes, upon giving the Developer writtan notice of Its intention to do so, sa ar_upon the property hereinafter described and Cox, lute sold inroveneats and recover all costs of cocpletioa inured by the City frw, the Developer. t. To secure the perfotsance by the Developer of, the urns and conditions of this Agt*ac,at and to secure the repaymat m City , of any funds which my be expended by City in completing said Improve - sents upon default by the Developer horeunder, the Developer does- by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City the following described real property @itmtad in the City of Unobo Cuess»aga, County It Ban Derwrdioo, state of California, to-vit• Parcel 2 of parcel cup 1189 as recorded in Dock 30. page 99 of `arcei mps official rucords of said County. 3 This eooveyanoe it in tsn@t• howgt• for the purposes ..' described above. 8. aow, therefore, It the Developer *hall faithfully ' 3 perfam all of the acts and things by than to be doom undar this Aq:eec,nt• then this conveyance shall W veldt otherwise, SC shall , remin In full force and effect and In all respects *hall be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights-am obligations of the partite with respect thereto @hall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the State Of California• and any other applicable statute, pertaining to nortgages on real property. 7. This Agreeeent shall be binding upoi and &hall Insure , to the benefit Of the haft$, executors, adnlNatraw:4 NCCVs$Or* dnd assigns of each of the parties hereto. .� ;w s� !, C s. 7s the extent roquittl m glue affect of this Agreement ea e mortgage. the tern - 0ovomper• stall man - mortgegar- and the City shall be the •m:tgages- as those terse ate "ad a the Civil Coda of the Beata of Cnl:forota and any other sutots 0armining to • mortgages on real property. g. It legal action is commenced to enforce ear of the grovislces of this Agreasm.nt, m t� Any enn Mich the City Is entitled to recovea from the 0avaloper beraoaCer or to foreclose the rigbt Of the Develepsr m Cadets the above - described property from the mortgege created hereby. Nee the prevailing party shall be entitled to rscrver its coats and mach reasonable attortlyl, fees as shall be ''.. awarded or the Cocrt. IN aliStlg9 vgzzw. the parties aerate have eseeoted this Agreement on toe day and year first above Kitten. Cllr. oevvorlg, CITY or CAROM CUC:Anonw. • corporatio . municipal corporation Mayor ..rresr, LuRril H. City CAuk O 1• R 'Y. �ri' �l?? �; �7' 1Fz�AG 'ffA"4GiY•Me::�'ni.`�:$�121't �f a i i YY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 3, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Bubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Brall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Intent to Vacate Unnecessary Stxeets and Alloys Within the Victoria Project (Tract 11934) .he vacation of streets and alleys an shown on the attached drawing is required as a condition of tentatite approval for the Victoria Project. Tbe3e vacations needs to be completed prior to recordation of the tract map so that information can be noticed on the final map prior to recordation. The William Lyon Company has requested that we begin the pro - codure to vacate the streets to eliminate any delays in obtain - Lag final approval on the tract map. The attached resolution seta the date of public hearing for April 7, 1982. At that time, tha options of continuing the public hearing until the tract map is ready for final approval or approving the vacation with the condition that it be record- ed concurrently with the tract map can be discussed. It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolu- tion setting the date for public hearing on April 7, 1982. Respectfully autfai(!ttteedd, /3/,a, ' ^�J LBr K: Attr:hments i T j; RESOLUTION NO. g — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE UNNECESSARY STREETS AND ALLEYS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PROJECT AS HEREIN DESCRIBED BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 83DD, et. seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941. ' SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its Intention to vacate the attached described Streets and Allays, as shown on Map No. V -015 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3• That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, _ the 7th day—WITM, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Lion's Park Community Service Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its determining whether said City street is • necessary for present or prospective street purposes. SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to posted conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least 10 days befog the hearing, not more than 3DO feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall have a cola of this resolution an them and shall have the following title in lettering not less than one inch in height: °NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET ". SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations ano exceptions, if any, it existing utilities on record. SECTION 6: The .ayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk stTaTT attest r: the same, and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published 10 days mefore the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re art, a newspaper of general circulation published in the C tity e. ntar o, califernia, and circulated in the City of Rancho = Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 1982. io AYES: NOES: ILA A ABSENT: rc .� 1 i F r s• r �s } r k+ �i C? rr LEGAL V -015 STREETS TO SE ABANDONED WITHIN PHASE I PARCEL A RAILROAD AVENUE NORTH (40.00 FEET WIDE), THE ALLEY (30.00 FEET WIDE) AND VICTORIA STREET (30.00 FEET WIDE) ALL SHOWN ON THE MAP OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20, PAGE 1 OF MAP BOOKS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, LYING EAST- ERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WEST 330.00 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF FILED IN THE DISTRICT LAND OFFICE. PARCEL B THE UNNAMED ROAD (66.0d) FEET WIDE LYINI BETWEEN THE NORTHERLY PRO- LONGATIONS OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 4 AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK J OF ETIWANDA CO ONY LANDS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 24 OF MAP BOOKS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY AND THE UNNAMED ROAD OR ALLEY OF UNDERTSMINED WIDTH ADJOINING BLOCK I OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS. i r�� l f .!1 6<i' r �T� Y T, I ' S •M i�•)f ..9'x.'1 T-;- 'sass /w •i % /e 0 -� s • � 1 e / �.. . . O .• .. / • oo '� I • / o' 7 0 I -, • 77 Crr'n!�'' 1;•J 1 I III I i `• —Qt ., s - - -_ _ •__1 • I 1 .I�_ - }-•�.f TENTATIVE TRACT R� I - • y N0. 11934 I p, fv r 11P _ .. . DE VACATED .. —TRACT 8MCARY 600' RADIUS CXV f., •Y�'.f$ •, f " C!T'! OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • • y y -MEMORANDUM " \ ; 1727 February 26, 1982 pI. 1 To: City Council . \° From: Finance D1re for Sub3ectt Resolution Authorizing loan to Redevelopment Agency Attached please find a Resolution pertaining to .a loan tram _ tta City of Rancho Cucamonga to the Rancho Cucamnga Redevelopment Agency. This the final transaction necessary to complete this ' laaa. With this second loan the amount borrowed by the Redevelopment Agency is now $120.000. As Treasurer of the Agency, I vas able to secure a Treasury Bill at 1-1.602 Interest. This is in response to the directive of the Agercy Board to invest Redevelopment Foods not being used. Balm is a curreat cash suamary of Redevelopment Abencyt Cash (as of 1- 31 -82) $18.515.25 Expenditures thru 3-3-62 8,015.80 ,- Sub -Total $10,499.45 Additional loan from City 50.000.00 �._ Total Cash Balance as of 3 -3-82 560.499.45 a° `•i Invested (O.S.Traasury Bill) $50.000.00 *�a J �1 B� �+W�! °��y.�FItT.���i:."!)�.4�': �_'..�`F1WS.ti1_1'�� -f .1 ' 1 r' ' `'f •1��A�F4� °i _ _ {� • A mmmem of in crrr cm=v- Cry TU C" C9 VPJ174CA, CAUyMU A2nMW A UP= =A?13 A IMM TIM 17S1 .1182 U="Lm= &cc= UWW =PUrA 23MUCIFICipt th. city ca; mil. I- -C-"-1 Inch IS. rra�-,.Oa Cuy.a, �st, U tcpaalt Lm. bas tma 8 ted.�iasaw, A.IaO7 roW fa` 'he W. .9 �tlas f,c .4&IOlsMtl1Q =1 at .-Oal 0-.-.g- Redexorawat 14--y w fteds &",ad It by the CICY COOICL11 Oaa 0. j1,7 —,I to loaa lawl, W tfo VICLUAI. b. Ao at .—I- caaaacaga Lasxwe ogcm@pp Ra4a,alopIaOt AgOvOY =MY=. of it 2z=vn by cbe rAty a—CL, or the aty, Of Laqcb, COCARIOS• u f011a**s rA 0,0.1 baraly apmPristed tm 14=� M,, , "Waure FOII4 law .Oaaty 1".eiapaaas Agency "ala castO " tbw apply w 'u. .-� CIO&aagIA ",giapmrall AS,=, 11 &A=cdas. -'it% that AsOCK7's OPP"'" bWvt for flacal 7,= 1941-1982. ♦ t rut tb. %WSOC Of the *� laO-,4aP"aat 1961-1192. as tt-b" III Zhu ltaaal.tL.. AlaCy I" �� Tut SO W-107 m9a ist tba 9411-129 ISaaa"I ACr= C.-maty aadoialn--t Ag.a A&Ltalsa.tive.rumd AdMKIA tItt"- VA=. O71009ED .ad "WM th" an, NMI saas Via" S�•lotaar. "yar —ogy rI.X 14 '14 P ;i i� M C Ciff OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF' REPORT DATE: March 3, 1S82 ;• e TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Lloyd H Hubbs, City Engineer Byt Barbara Rrall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Intent to Va-late Oak Road, East of Amethyst Street and West Of &lusman - Leonard Tyko Mr Leonard Tyke of 5135 Alusman Avenue s requesting the vacation of an offer of dedication for Oak Road as shown on the attached sup. No improvement exists on this portion of Oak Road nor has en o• -er of dedication been made on the south aide of the ro�'l. _ The attached letter from Yx. Tyke indicates that priVLte access to exiatacthat has access todPacelA2 mayabesprovided when the southerly vacant property develops The Plan:,ing Comaission approved this vacation request at their meeting of February 101 1982, RECOMMENDATION it is setting the dated for public hearing forrthe attached 1pril 7, 1982. Respectfully a bmitted, V.I, Attachments Y RESOLUTION NO. '99-' V e A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUtlC',L OF THE CITY OF RMICHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERU?DINO. STAT: OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE OAK ROAD LOCATED EAST. OF mErmr STREET AND HEST OF KLUSNAN. (V -016) T -,- - E CE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects • to proce un er ection 8300, et. seq., of the Streets and Highways Cude, also known as the Street vacation Act of 1941. ' SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby declares its intent of n to vacate Oak Road a City street, as shorn on Hap No. V -016 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal • description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit 'A° and by reference mde a part hereof. ` SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Weinesdgy, We TF day of April, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the ` Lion's Park Ccimunity Service Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its determining whether said City street is necessary for present or prospective street purpo.es. SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause n —oTs to be posted conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be .acated at least 10 days before the hearing, not more than 300 fret apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall have 3 opy of this resolution on them and shall have the fallowing title in lettering not less than one inch in height: 'NOTICE OF HUXING TO VACATE STREET'. ' SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservatTo—ns and exceptions, if ary, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 6: The Myor shall sign this Resolution and the City' tTerTc shall attest to the ssme. and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dal ly Feoort,a newspaper of general circulation pumishz in the C1 of Ontario, California, end circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADAPTED this 3rd day of March, 1982. ,Ai T -,- - E t G WHIRLAWAY -- t � c4 I I o Por I 1.95 AC. 61/L y ll I�GAIC N) I jI ©) I t I F tz Lc-Z AM I ' I 'I N♦ I • I +t 1 i G I r 1 I I •'r I I ! Y 1 I t I 1 I 1 I � I I I I iy I W I Q� I I I I I i 0 t ;fi a •I '—NIL.LSI06 -- -- ROAD r `y+'l it✓: A.��i�.iv �'d.'hv'!�� , lF �l^�.�R Y 1 ��F'��//.�•I.(.iG i s • ann:ideration in this mattor. Enclosed you will find a $123.00 for the filing foe. The sneond issue I would li1:e b b -ing to your attention �q is the approximate 1400 feet long earthen flood control channel. It is E7 understanding that the channel trs reque�tod cs a stop gap measure before the Demons --load Control Channel was .Funded and built. The home owners I have spd.:on with do not feel that hthe channel is now necessary with the Demons channel com_leted. t We would like to see the channel reduced from its 60 feet wide or eli-nenrted and t• a property returned to the hone owners. '•ie realizo that our opinior is hissed and that you a=e much are qualified to determine the overall needs of the city. So, I can only mention our concerns, hops that the-7 have merit znd you will view them favorably. Prank y, the moot obvious reason for elirinctir%Z the chsnel in we do not feel it is necesocsy with ' t::d Dcmene Chnnnel completed. Secondly, I wouldn't be honest ;i with you if I didn't ainit that we property owners would like "•'� _ o h t•rve at least a 7ortion of the 80 foot wide ch ^,aal returned n — — _ ---•— t - - - — •- - - - 7 �._ for our own use. Thirdly, the channel has beccaa a nuisance with uninvited pno in travclin5 it casing, duct, nione and._.. da_rrc to the tioninr, nrooerty owners. Pot_^tsly, the flood -• ' - control c`=ncl has bee :mc c ire has rd. The channel termin•, - ates it both ands into o-sn fieldc of bruch and %coda. It ha.: '.s '.+�•,�° •_`_- becor_o n c0nd -uit for .'ire, somc`.!•in; %m cro concornod abr;t �3 ` _._ �_ -- -__ _ - �._ .... _— - _�- _-- _— G�=� -= aid- �- :•�r�= 'i+i >• . •4 �r��1�i �.. ..+��r�.��a .1 .j - __ � / ♦fit - _ir+ r ...rr �.»�' t��tt. brwtilYe a t'f��.�.�..�y+ =..��. :Y .: :�.'C'i !�' :i .. �. .. •.: ... •_ ."'J �C�__ -�� -. `,iv _ -�v y..'_li c: '°� ,r itan11VE9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Moyd B. Rubbs C01MUNTY DEVOOMENT OUT S•: E. ..j'• City Engineer NOV 14 1981 ' •+ + 9320 C Baseline Road Brncha CUe=onga, C.1 91701 AM pit ` -- ..._tear 11r. Bubbs, -•- 1'•," The purpose of this letter is tiro -Sold. First I would request a.. V' :r. like to the pity to abandon an offer if e-• ay wife and ,�•;,«� •,made of a proposed dedication of Oak Road, Secondly that • •� - the city and Flood OOntrgl Dintrict modify or abandon a short e^rthen flood control chasnol. The rc,ad 1 am refer_Sni to is Oak Toed - Parcel man ITo. - 2374 - 30Uthorn 30 feet, 423 feet long - minor subdivision 75 -C381. The road_ exist only on paper and has no i:.arow:ents. The concerned property ownere do not use any portion of tlds proposed road, Purther, Oak Road bras not continued through. to ' Aaeth;3t when the land was evoloned bettmen the flood control chah.'ml and Aaet . -- - "-- - ::'i.•.:' hynt, A home has been bolt on �;mt would -he -- «<.-• an ex:onsion of Oak Ro�A to Amethyst hyat thus prohibiting the de- vela -az ent of the rouT, _ -_- - •- `- — _ -- • -- —z ' �•—' .. .. 1, .. ,•^,_ '.::rra :u-' oak R0=1 s an of =er that wo made to get approval of a _ ..,:- ?_ „ -•;, _ lot s71St. Zt ^a nocpn -a.y, pt tha' time, to gain acces3 10 t'-e souti•ern two v:r'ts. Tho 3outhorn lwo ac -es have since- -- —•.,.- bann sold and nrcoss to the property in a ;awed road from •L•ie.ty3t; tierefore, O,c Rond in not n ecessary. 11wi:.you for ;,+y h i,. 0 j:4v :� ?�•- .•'`•a __ 'rY. N �• ..�_,� •' i. .. -' _�_- �..- �z- r-- �r...:_�- i..�...i +...v. -a�� -. __.. _' ' _:_ c�• • •'1- .*..i: "vas +Z �_ rr•:`t•YC ."�1 -. {pT .� i !,� ..... .. �..,- 'r••i. L-:. -- • -�(• •��+' -f.a y:•�, f.�. _. wi�c.a. ���ti�,y. •' tee, }wJ rYF :' a�i ..( �.. -. _ Y -.. _e ,. ...... ,:.•.u...a..ri:r`(.'"LC� w�,r.rti�y,�, .L f a• 9incerly, j� • v. �l� Y a ieon=d H. Tyke it Alta Lomo, OA 91701 -- , r, but :•-ve not n0llectiv317 taken any action to tvnove th= if i` we are r ^sponsiTle. - I realize that the city !,as many duties and ro=nonsibili- ties that I as not Wdure of and it is ucsaiblo that ray request i —may not be in the bast interest of the city becauss of my nor - ;. ro:r vier of these matters; Horrover, the o-�.Wons I have are very tj no =_nSn ;fui to me and I heDe that you will consider them In the z Y, ^• P=nner. I have greseated them. If there Is aro edditioncl ia'o oration i can sue,ly you with, ?let" call me at home 71!/989 -2061 or work 714/•3991261. - Than:: you a ;ain. - f a• 9incerly, j� • v. �l� Y a ieon=d H. Tyke .5316 Kluzman - - Alta Lomo, OA 91701 -- , i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 3, 1982 TO: City Council and City Managor FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Authorisation to Request Proposals for Materials Testing and Construction Surveys for Assessment District 79 -1 Q Staff is requesting Council app =oval to request proposals for materials testing and construction surveys for Ass..sament District 79 -1. These proposals will be reviewed by staff and c.ae firm selected for recommendation to the City Council for award of contract. RF.00M?4M Di.TION It is recommended that City Council authorize staff to request proposals for materials testing and construction surveys for Assessment District 79 -1. Respectfully Wbmitted, �Y Lb :jaa r J"yyy 4��i.i ti h r u r� V n' 8• r � nmv nn n , vnan nrrn • �inun STAFF REPORT DATE: March 3, 1982 t7L-- TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Znglneer SUBJECT: Agreamant with R. C. Land Company Concerning Advance and Reimbursement of Funds for Engineering Work in Connection with Assessment District 79 -1 The Council will recall that at the time of ordering the completion .of the Industrial Assessment District 79 -1, R. C. Land Company committed to provide $100,000 to assist in the Engineering expenses related to formation of the District. The attached agreement specifies the condition for repayment or credit for this contribu- - tion in the contingencies of formation or abandonment of the Die - tr.ct. The agreement basically allows for repayment of all advances frog- Dond sale or credits to storm drain fees for storm drain plane. !, R. C. Land will retain ownership of street plans within the bounds - rien of their property. The agreements have been reviewed and approved by Bond Counsel. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the agreement with R. C. Land Company RE: Advance and Reimbursement of Funds for Engineering Work in Connection with Assessment District No. 79 -1 and authorise the Mayor and City Clerk to execute on their behalf. Res ctfully sub3dtted, ., Attachment 30 r. 's 4 , t AGREEMENT RE ADVANCE AND REIMBURSEMCNT OF FUNDS FOR ENGINEERING WORK IN Z CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 79 -1 Ih THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the day of , 1987• by and between the CITY OF RANCHO �. CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation of the State of California (*the Citf•), and R. C. LAND COMPANY, a California general ? partnership, as the owner of certain real property located within the City ("R.C. Land•)1 and said parties, intending to be legalll bound hereby, and for and in consideration of the mutual representations, promiaes, and agreements herein con- • tatned, hereby agree as follows: • SECTION 1. Recitals i This Agreement is predicated upon the following facto: A. The City is presently taking proceedings toward the formation of a special assessment district under the terms and { conditions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 for the construction of certain street and storm drain improvements, said special assessment district being known ar•1 referred to as m� ' Assessment District No. 79 -1 (the ' Assessment District-). B. In order to enable the City to pay for the initial legal and assessment district engineering services required to Initiate proceedings for the Assessment District, R.C. Land has y onaole the Assessment District to proceed. In recognitir.,: ce the mutual benefit of proceeding with the Assessment District. -�: the City has requested R.C. Land to assist the City in the funding of the engineering services. P. R.C. Land is willing to assist the City in its efforts to implement the Assessment District and to advance an addi- tional amount up to $100,000 to enable the City to cause the completion of the aforesaid engineering services, subject to c the terms and conditions set forth herein. SECTION 2. Improvements - Amount of Advances ` R.C. Land agrees to advance to the City up to $100,000 for engineering and preparation of plans and specifications for t" laprovements listed below and shown on the attached Exhibit A. (a) Storm Drain 19A. The design engineering of Storm Drain 19A is a portion of the work to be performed by Williamson and Schmid in accordance with the provisions of the a May 7, 1981 agreement between the City and Williamson and U, Schmid. The fee for all of the engineering services described in said agreement is anticipated to be approximately $17S,0001 and the amount to be advanced by R.C. Land with respect to this work is estimated to be# and shall not exceed, $27,000. (b) Storm Drain 7E. The design engineering for Storm Drain 7e is a portion of the work to be performed Jy Lockwood pursuant to the agreement between the City and Lockwood dated may 7, 1981. The fee for all engineering services described in -3- ,. 0080P/21S9/01 `;1, b Y heretofore advanced to the City the sum of $25,0001 and, by an agreement entitled 'Assessment District Re "ibursement Agree- ment• dated December 3, 1950, the City has agreed to reimburse- said sum to R.C. Lae,_ upon the formation of the Assessment Dis- trict. C. In order to InitiaLe preparation of plans and coecifi- cations for the improvements proposed to be Installed in the Assessment District, R.C. Land contracted with Arrowhead En- gineering, which in turn subcontracted with Lockwood Engineer- ing and Surveying Company, Inc. ( "Lockwood•) to design and engineer a certain portion of the proposed street improve- ments. In connection therewith, R.C. Land has advanced the sum- of $59,931.91. Lockwood has entered into an agreement for engineering services with the City, which agreement is dated May 7, 1981, and pursuant to which Lockwood will, among other things, comp.ete the design and construction drawings for a portion of said proposed street improvements. D. The City has also entered into an agreement for en- gineering services with Williamson and Schmid Civil Engineers (*Williamson and Schmid`),, pursuant to which Williamson and Schmid will provide engineering services for the design of cer- tain of the storm drain facilities proposed to be Installed in connection with the Dsse -ament District. E. The com- letion of the engineering work to be performed by Lockwood and Williamson and Schmid is necessary in order to OO80P/2159/01 1�:yn •. � y —2— I r �J e i . ?S i'. i i said agreement is anticipated to be approximately $83,0001 the Portion thereof to be advanced by R.C. Land with respect to Storm Drain 7E is estimated to be, and shall nos exceed, • $33,000. (c) Sixth Street and Milliken Avenue. The design en- gineering for the street improvements to be installed in Sixth Street from Cleveland Avenue to New Rochester and Milliken Avenue from Fourth Street to Sixth Street, a portion of the wo:x to be performed by Lockwood pursuant to the aforesaid agreement. As indicated hereinabove, the fee for all engineer- ing services described in said agreement is estimated to be $83,000. The portion thereof to be advanced by R.C. Land with respect to said street plans is estimated to be, and shall not exceed, $40,000. SECTION 3. Procedures re Advances Within thirty days following the execution of this agree- ment by the City, R.C. Land will advance the full sum of $100,000 payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 4. Ownership of Documents Upon completion of the design engineering . each of the improvements referred to herainabove, R.C. Land shall be deemed to be the beneficial owner of all surveys, plans, specific& - ciona, bid documents, and other materials relating to such improvements supplied to the City by Lockwood and Williamson and Schmid (collectively, the 'Engineering Documents') within _4- 1 A C 8 the limit designated in Section 2 and in Exhibit At provided, ;. however, that unless R.C. Land requests the City to deliver the j, same to R.C. Land the City s'iall retain physical possession thereof for use in connection with the Assessment District. Unless and until such time as R.C. Land may request the City to deliver all or any portion of the Engineering Documents to it, the City shal) have the right and the obligation to purchase R.C. .and's beneficial ownership therein by reimbursing R.C. Land tte amounts described in Section 5 hereof. prior to effecting such a purchase, neither the City nor any other person or party of any kind whatsoever shall be authorized or permitted to utilize said Engineering Documents in connection with the construction of any of the improvements described therein. SECTION 5. Reimbursement to R.C. Land The City agrees to reimwurse to R.C. Land the sum of the following, (1) $59,931.94, representing the amount heretofore d advanced by R.C. Land to Arrowhead Engir.eerirg in connection y with the preparation of engineering ftr various street Improve- ments proposed to be included in the Assessment District; (ii) the total of all advances made by R.C. Land 'to the City pur- suant to the provisions of this Agreement; and (fit) interest on the amounts described in (i) and (ii) hereof and or. the $25,00o heretofore advanced to the City pursuant to the afore- said agrgement of December 3, 1980, such interest to be paid from the -dare of each advance at the rate of interest charged �»� 35 by the City in consideratica of the advancement of its own r funds toward the cost of engineering for the improvements to be z -s ins_alled in the Assessment District; provided, however, that It the City does not charge interest with respect to its own funds, then no interest need be paid to A.C. Lard. If the Assessment District is formes, the :ity will include In the amount to be assessed, as an Incleintal expense, an amount equal to the sum which it is required to reimburse to R C. Lard pursuant hereto; and, upon receipt of each payments and /or proceeds ftom the sale of special assessment district .� bonds, the City will promptly pay to R.C. Land said amount as 1 "..mbursement for the advances referred to hereinabove. !n the event that the City has not reimbursed said sum to R.C. Land on or before December 31, 1982, then the City shall reimburse all zadvances made by R.C. Land for the engineering of storm drain Improvements by crediting said advance against storm drain fee i' obligation of properties owned by R.C. Land within the bound- aries of Assessment District 79 -I. In addition at the option q of R C Land, the City snail require that any person construct - ing any of the street improvements referred to hereinabove shall utilise the Engineering Documents applicable thereto and shall pav to the City, which In turn shall f rward the aamt to R.C. Land, a prorrta share of the amount cf reimbursement to t i which R.C. Land is entitled pursuant hereto. -6- -,-0080P/2159/01 ^7� i:. WA 0 I r SECTION 6. Miscellaneous and Procedural A. All notices givsn or required to be given hereunder or by law shall be in writing and addressed to the parties as set out below, or to such other address as me, be noticed under Ind pursuant to his paragraph. Any such notice Shall be deemed given when actually received by the party intended, whether personally served or sent postage prepaid by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. TO City: City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: City Engineer TO R.C. Land: R. C. Land Company C/o The Koll Company - 4490 Von Karmen Avenue Newport Beach, California 92660 Attention: Richard M. Ortwein • B If any action is instituted to interpret or enforce this Agreement, the party prevailing in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. C. Nothing contained herein shall in any way limit or impair the rights of either party under and pursuant to the follo. ag agreements previously made by them: Assessment Dis- trict Reimbursement Agreement dated December 3, 198C, Agreement 1 re Acceleration of Constru :lion and Additional Improvements in s. Assessment District No. 79 -1 dated Juno 18, 1981, and Assess- ment District No. 79 -1 Purchase and Reimbursement Agreement dated June 18, 1981. S a OO80P /2159/01 tirj 371 t z: rr Mayor city Clerk -n i App a , formD cKens a Brown Bond Counsel -B- OCSOP /2159/01 3 �j b -. a G .x 1 I 2 . - The parties hereto have read this Agreement, understand and It• consent to be bound by all its terms, and agree that it shall _ „ be effective as of the ttrst date above written. A. C LAND COMPANY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST. z: rr Mayor city Clerk -n i App a , formD cKens a Brown Bond Counsel -B- OCSOP /2159/01 3 �j b -. a G .x 1 I r 0 "#0 - CITY OF RANCHO CUC . ct4.1GA STAFF RED .T Dates March 3, 1982 "' tm To% 'City Council and City Manager Prom, Dill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Subject: Authorization for Community Service Department to attend one day Emergency /Disaster Training Seminar Request authorization to send three Department representatives to a one -day workshop iz LaCanada on how to put on "Earth- quake Preparedness Programs` for thu general public. I met the program organizers at the League Conferencc last October and saw their methodology for the general public presentations. It was very good, geared to P.T.A.'s, civic groups and the lips, without the 'technical hoopla` normally associated with such programs. We could then begin offering, as a City service, to send speakers to local groups, ;uch as P.T.A.'s, churches and civic groups and giving talks on how they can best prepare for this eventuality. This would have two benefits, the first and most important of course, is a knowledgeable and prepared community. Second, it will give us a terrific PH boost within the community. The cost $125 per participant, would be charged against the Management Development account. M:.H: nm Location of Budnm -Numb& 20 Foothill Blvd. amore I TOTAL 176.40 1 U87 . new a Jog nemtut ledde OyUWK? Yes and Sheet ffr l (Neel 9. Have You om been cnavtcvod of n foknyi IS Have yo. •var rfoknd any of the provittom of the Akohalk No 11neap• Corwol AU or reg latiotn of the D•pormunl per aewrlp to dl• AaT Yea — mlmerous 11. E+pioln a -M- on. to Item 9 or t0 on on aewhm•nt .hkh doll Im deemed part of Al. opprwotim 12. Apprm f opn& (a) that •^F ma.ap& ewployed wen -solo k.med premb& .@ ha.n all the pwGficallon h1 9 karmee. am (b) (lot he .111 nat ..fans w =w m pww t to be vblatd w7 of 'So pr slam of the Almho0e Seveo9• Control Ad 12. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Coast of San 9crnnralno Doe 11 -24 -SZ _ 11,/1r .1,.M1 ,r erlrr rr rw .Nr .Irrv. r...r1 Nlw wW1 W rt• 111 1b Y M yeey.. r w N M r..nsr4 r Y ra1Jw it N M 1Mw &care +w �M M 1r,«yq yyyrv. Mr r.lnr,e 1r W. 1tA 1«idY, r, w NNe� T Y N Yr rwN M Ica •1Ye yeww..r. W ty.n M r.rr aryl W e1r � ,w/ r N M Ysrq a1wY wY w M OI Y « Mw .Mr Mr M «rllwr r «.errn 6v « r..r• wrrw w M W1 ✓, r «rasrY YrMw u1 N r.w1M +Mr b YrrfU M .W W rJWYr Y rrrr (a M�/A• r r1e,.r er.Jw Y r1 �Y w 1uYlr M «e1w, N . Ire r Y MV N w,rro 1wrM Iwe care at• N.1r 111II Mer!1.'y Irl+o w e1/I1 ~M .rJr+r IA ar�i MMi YwM �NIS11r r-4 .W.w� w e�rawr r Mrarlwr ANY « nwYre Wr Y it g.` ' a tr i TN �siRO K CORPORATION _ bGN HERE r 1 . _y . 112;-" �( / APPLICATIONJ �BY, TRANSFEROR •.�;;;�- TfAIE OF CALIFORNIA cewy el Y.Y er.Yr N e.ln. o.+ tiw .ew rl•rrl+e .rrrt 4Yr..wM/..e r.. III tr Y M are r ....rear .leer .1 w rr•�r. tluwr, "_4 .,,re h M Iraerro .err 1e.elw.n µ ..Ierrrrre r reel. eY ..W. ol.eaer r w eMr el eN w Ir'Ar r.1« r.NYrw. r ..,ewer i ♦ Y...e Y d. .wd.e errNd MrMe Wr .w1 r .rrlr r 4 M .rvar..ror Iran YarY. Y e re.rr .rllr J all ww14 Ica.. R MD Yrrlr Y rerrJ N M &feeler Ill Y M ..rlr ory14rY. r rr.r. note Y w ti Y M r11Y.1 M &err+ N. rnr r r hire '.� ar....rrw rlrrre tr rr. are .Yy •rr. rrrAro M en r .eY. Y .rlr ..rtlr.r� Y aJ W M w.rwrr r .. •eY r M.IMD s y ..Neer r. r W rI r,iwr N Ywrw. r Y 4M1W r Ylr. w. rrMr N Yrlrrl la M M wwlr yNYrrY. r.r Y wl.M.r a. 'Ir IYr .a. COPY M r.r dN..�a.r... •0 e.•lu . -r(' o. H.e w.e. Acne This u.."e« Ne.tt•.N.n 0111.. tMy PWPUCATIOH FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(B) 1. TYPE(S) Of LICENSES) FILE NO. (.K .<r'< Tm Dopoumonf of AkoWK Bov&op• Control RECNPT NO. t 12130 Shoat SAN 13MNARDINO OFF SALE PEER & NINE (TfT7A 1:. So Ator Calif. 93814 cEacaArwcu r «m.v..m1r.K.Mr1 CODE 3615 The undnri9ned hemby app8o, for . Dme r s dembed w follo.o . o luwd Temp. (.emit _ 2. NAMES) OF AFTUCANTM _ AppOed ond« Sec 240" U i 'HE CIRCLE K CORPnRATTnNglaw FR•ctin Dote Sl ER«dn Dotm ' 4 List 0. TYPE(S) Of TRANSACTION(S) FEE T! �- Hui S O.OQ ANNUAL 26.40 E20 Location of Budnm -Numb& 20 Foothill Blvd. amore I TOTAL 176.40 1 U87 . new a Jog nemtut ledde OyUWK? Yes and Sheet ffr l (Neel 9. Have You om been cnavtcvod of n foknyi IS Have yo. •var rfoknd any of the provittom of the Akohalk No 11neap• Corwol AU or reg latiotn of the D•pormunl per aewrlp to dl• AaT Yea — mlmerous 11. E+pioln a -M- on. to Item 9 or t0 on on aewhm•nt .hkh doll Im deemed part of Al. opprwotim 12. Apprm f opn& (a) that •^F ma.ap& ewployed wen -solo k.med premb& .@ ha.n all the pwGficallon h1 9 karmee. am (b) (lot he .111 nat ..fans w =w m pww t to be vblatd w7 of 'So pr slam of the Almho0e Seveo9• Control Ad 12. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Coast of San 9crnnralno Doe 11 -24 -SZ _ 11,/1r .1,.M1 ,r erlrr rr rw .Nr .Irrv. r...r1 Nlw wW1 W rt• 111 1b Y M yeey.. r w N M r..nsr4 r Y ra1Jw it N M 1Mw &care +w �M M 1r,«yq yyyrv. Mr r.lnr,e 1r W. 1tA 1«idY, r, w NNe� T Y N Yr rwN M Ica •1Ye yeww..r. W ty.n M r.rr aryl W e1r � ,w/ r N M Ysrq a1wY wY w M OI Y « Mw .Mr Mr M «rllwr r «.errn 6v « r..r• wrrw w M W1 ✓, r «rasrY YrMw u1 N r.w1M +Mr b YrrfU M .W W rJWYr Y rrrr (a M�/A• r r1e,.r er.Jw Y r1 �Y w 1uYlr M «e1w, N . Ire r Y MV N w,rro 1wrM Iwe care at• N.1r 111II Mer!1.'y Irl+o w e1/I1 ~M .rJr+r IA ar�i MMi YwM �NIS11r r-4 .W.w� w e�rawr r Mrarlwr ANY « nwYre Wr Y it g.` ' a tr i TN �siRO K CORPORATION _ bGN HERE r 1 . _y . 112;-" �( / APPLICATIONJ �BY, TRANSFEROR •.�;;;�- TfAIE OF CALIFORNIA cewy el Y.Y er.Yr N e.ln. o.+ tiw .ew rl•rrl+e .rrrt 4Yr..wM/..e r.. III tr Y M are r ....rear .leer .1 w rr•�r. tluwr, "_4 .,,re h M Iraerro .err 1e.elw.n µ ..Ierrrrre r reel. eY ..W. ol.eaer r w eMr el eN w Ir'Ar r.1« r.NYrw. r ..,ewer i ♦ Y...e Y d. .wd.e errNd MrMe Wr .w1 r .rrlr r 4 M .rvar..ror Iran YarY. Y e re.rr .rllr J all ww14 Ica.. R MD Yrrlr Y rerrJ N M &feeler Ill Y M ..rlr ory14rY. r rr.r. note Y w ti Y M r11Y.1 M &err+ N. rnr r r hire '.� ar....rrw rlrrre tr rr. are .Yy •rr. rrrAro M en r .eY. Y .rlr ..rtlr.r� Y aJ W M w.rwrr r .. •eY r M.IMD s y ..Neer r. r W rI r,iwr N Ywrw. r Y 4M1W r Ylr. w. rrMr N Yrlrrl la M M wwlr yNYrrY. r.r Y wl.M.r a. 'Ir IYr r are lJ 0 Parcel Nap 5803 - located on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Lemon Avenue OWNER: None and Associates 7333 Hellman Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Improvement Security (Road) 586.000 The road improvements for Parcel Map 5803 have been constructed in accordance with the road improvement Flans and it is recommended that the City Council accept the Improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. - Parcel Nap 4762 - located at 6th Street and Lucas Rancho Road OWNER: Westwards Properties P.O. Box 197 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Faithful Performance Bond (Road) 586.000 The road improvements for Parcel %p 4762 have been constructed in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept the Improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. CUP 181 -04 - located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, south of Foothill Blvd. OWNER: vineyard National Bank P. 0. Box 727 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $47,000 The road improvements for Conditional Use Permit No. 81-04 have been constructed in accordance wit the road improvement plans and it 1s recommended that the City Council acce.t the improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion continued... CrfY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA d STAFF REPORTqq�� DATE: Karen 3, 1982 lsa TO: rity Council and City Manager�{{ FROM: Lluyd Hubbs, City Engineer %1'�P1r SUBJECT: Consent Calendar, Release o Bonds and Notiats of Completion Parcel Nap 5803 - located on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Lemon Avenue OWNER: None and Associates 7333 Hellman Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Improvement Security (Road) 586.000 The road improvements for Parcel Map 5803 have been constructed in accordance with the road improvement Flans and it is recommended that the City Council accept the Improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. - Parcel Nap 4762 - located at 6th Street and Lucas Rancho Road OWNER: Westwards Properties P.O. Box 197 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Faithful Performance Bond (Road) 586.000 The road improvements for Parcel %p 4762 have been constructed in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept the Improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. CUP 181 -04 - located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, south of Foothill Blvd. OWNER: vineyard National Bank P. 0. Box 727 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $47,000 The road improvements for Conditional Use Permit No. 81-04 have been constructed in accordance wit the road improvement plans and it 1s recommended that the City Council acce.t the improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion continued... Staff Report March 3, 1982 Relesse of Bonds Page 2 Parcel rap 4594 - located at the northeast caner of Haven Avenm and Jersey Blvd. OWNER: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. 1260 W. Foothill Blvd. Upland, California 91786 ` Monumentation Bond $4,000 Certification from the project engineer indicates that all final monuments have been set and that he has been paid in full. Director Review 80 -39 - located at she southeast corner of Jersey and Utica OWNER Robert Manufacturing Company 10667 Jersey Boulevard Rancho Cucamonna, Ca. 91730 ^ Certificate of Deposit $7,500 \ Three required street lights have been installed per the approvto plan and it is recatmended that the Certificate of Deposit be released. i LBH Dc i v 7 S Y i :µ �4 W � i� lllW' o�.,�. r' • .- . _, \i_`_ ° . . i ... ',��ir 'Y. `ra lo- > ". RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF TN! CID - COUNCIL O: ThF CITY OF RANCHO G CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL NAP 5803, PARCEL MAP 4762, AND CONO:TIONAL USE PEFJIIT 181 -04 ARD AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK s Parcul MapW4 622. andhConditionaliUse Pere ta181 -N have eels completed top the3, satiifactien of the City Engineer; and NIEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the wrk complete. , f; NOW. THEREFORE, ee it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the CI.y Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Nottw of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PA;SEO. APPROvED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 1982. _ AYES: 'f hroLs ABSENT, oar . Phillip lloosse or ATTEST: surer, M Wasseman. C.ty Te_rk Thu street addross of said pmpa:ty 12r B/A DATM)r s. 19 ' CITY Or Amcuo CCC.X -=A, -a ` nmlcipil ,rporatio., Omer 0Tr ' Baca dTittol t ' ( _ 11vamrm AcotT.STC0 07. ' - CM. C7 AAZAM C=',raSOA pest Offs" ear 907 AleCha Cutamrl9a, Callfamia 91710 i %TICS Bro0A= MIL TO. - 7+ CITT C2Br { a--r or eumo Ct.T•.AmwA , Dart Offico Box, 107 Ps3thc Cucamonga, Califortia 91730 _{ _ p`iTICe Ot GW @LBTIOO umcr. Is BLAIIIT Dlt'a MTr 1. She Wderelgned L nn owner of a interest > or as"" In the M :etn9fter described r"a propatty, the nature of M1ah istemst cr estate isr 7, PAIIEI WP Sm ,^ 3: TSe fall nrm and +ddras of the Mdersl9ted ester Ss) C2:T OP BALCLO CDCA=Gt. 9330 -C Baseline goad, Post Off1CS Box 107, Bands Cat— Is, Callfnrcr Lw 91730. 3. OO the 3rd day of March 1202. plated m the bereinofter described see foI. real there prOVa_ -ant rat forth in the C®tract drtYreete for the wik O. 1m- _ ked twormends for Portal Map SM $ e. no nape of the 01191"3 Contrsetor for the wrk of im, proaeaent aA • Mole vas ems Red dlssoctl1n. i - S. The real property so faried to herein is situated an the Clty of kaecho Cacamonga, cx mty of Seca Bernardino, CalifornL, and is dosertbod as folloses I Portal Map Sma Thu street addross of said pmpa:ty 12r B/A DATM)r s. 19 ' CITY Or Amcuo CCC.X -=A, -a ` nmlcipil ,rporatio., Omer 0Tr ' Baca dTittol t ' ( _ �t ..a RICCROI9a 1SOLSTf0 0`fs CST OP exICRO CLC6V=ot roar office Box go? ' ktneha C%Cenorga, Cellfornla 91710 WILY RCCORC10 RAIL To, My Ct6Rf CiT Or R•1YC00 c=,, mm Post O.Mca 83x•807 Ibneho Cutamnsa, California 91710 nOT'1CC O-- rCC0.ryyE =C I.CTICC Is mI:"AY arv='XAT' _ 1. in* ter descnad L an *bier Of An Interest or estate It !re t or as"" isatrlbd real property, the nature of %hlch interest or estate Ls PARCEL RAP 4762 2. Ttia fall nacre sod address of the oadet*lgesd owner See 1 CITY or RA=w COCAmo=. 9120 -C 0aea1lne Read, post Office Box 817, eane:,o Catanonga, Callforata 91730. 1. On the 3b day of lurch 1982. Chet* +v* cC -- plated on the hereinsllar deecribed real property the pmveftt eat forth in the Contract dormeate for w <k of in- bad Iepm,e eta for pam7 pkp 4762 4. Th* nax of the original COncrar tot for the wsrk of Lc- pmvovant es a %hole the MItaards ►ropTrttn S. The real property referred to :areia is attested lA the City or Rancho Cuuaonyyr, County of San reraerdino, California* and Is described as folIWS, I Paml lup 4762 - no street tddroe of "isi property lee SSA - -• D.AT10r , 19 '- OWIClpal corpaertian, a%ner oft Jdll�' j (Title) a RIL:OOISYs ACQ=TCO art CITT or RMCBO CLT.A.4== post office sox 807 Rancho Cweaaengas California 91730 WHMf ¢[WADED WL TO, CITY CLM CT OF PWICD0 COCAADNCA post Office sou•107 panrlo Coramnga, California 91730 "a street address of Said property la, WA - CAM, , 39 .. CITY or 0.tlCBO CL:C.%R A, a mnICINI corporation, Owner Or, Dare, (Tlcta) BOtZCD Or tC:!➢I1;TZOR , ' NOTLCf Is =my elm TBAT, — 1, The pnderalgned I s N Owner Of on Interest Or estate + - - !n the hereinafter described teal property, the eatoxe of which Interest or estate Is. .. Cup NO. 81-01 • '�. 2, The fall nape and address of the undersigned CT OF ?J=O CV=tCLTCA, 9110 -C Baseline Road, post T 807, Rancho Cosa".%,, Californian• 91710. 3. 03 the 3rd day of "Arch , 1982, there was con - plated rn the hereinafter described real thl ptoperty wrk of Ln- pnve nt set forth in the contract dOCtnnnts for -• ' ;y! Road teprovatntf for COndltlonAl the blunt b. 81.01 i'/` a. The oaxa of the Original rdntrartnr fcx the work of in- grove t as a whole was Vineyard 14tteeai Bank , S. The Is" property Snowed W hd"in Se sitstd in the City of Aaxho Cacanonga, COMW Of Ba„ Bornardlno, Callfor is, • and is desCribad as follow, ` CUP -b. VJA f r "a street address of Said property la, WA - CAM, , 39 .. CITY or 0.tlCBO CL:C.%R A, a mnICINI corporation, Owner Or, Dare, (Tlcta) v- i - • ORDINANCE NO. 169 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOPNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 10.04.070, 10.04.100. 10.20.010, 10.20.020, 0.40.010 A 6 B, 10.52.030. 10.52.040, 10.56.010, OF TITLE 30, VEHICLES A.911 --R4FFIC ip The City Council of the City of Rancho Cuc;,monga. California. does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 10.2.070 10.04.100 10.20.010, 10.20.020. 10. .010 A a 810.520330, .0 o t e 1 o the Rancho cucaw.mqa Kunicipal CCde are nereDy amended to read as follows: 10.04.070 Holidays. Within the meaning of this chapter. 'holidays' are a rst day of January, known as 'New Year's Day% the third Monday in February, known as "Washington's BiraheAy% the last Monday in May, known as "Plemorlal Day"; the fourth day of July, known as "Independence Day% the first Monday in September, mown as 'Labor Day"; the fourth Monday in October, known as "Veterans Day "; the last Thursday in November, known as "Thanksgiving Day "; and th6 twenty -fifth day of December, known as "Christmas Day ". In the event "New Year's Day% "Independence Day' and 'Christmas Day' falls on Sunday, the following day will be taken in lieu of the holiday, and if they fall on Saturday, the Friday preceding will be deemed a holiday. 10.2.100 Ordinance. 'Ordinance' means the ordinance, rule or regulation adopted y the C tty Council relating to the movement of traffic and enforcement thereof. 10.2.010 City traffic engineer to establish crosswalks. A. The city traffic engineer as authorized'by the City Council shall establish, designate and maintain crosswalks at intersections and other places by _ appropriate devices, marks or lines upon the surface _ of the roadway where in his opinion there is particu- lar danger to pedestrians crossing the roadway. --- - -- 8. The ci j traffic engineer as authorized by the City Council may install signs at or adjacent to an inter- section in respect to any crosswalk directing that — pedestrians shall not cross in the crosswalk so indicated. 10.52.030 Parkinq space markin s. The city traffic engineer is adtherize y e ty Council to instain and maintain Parking space markings to indicate parking spaces for on- street and off - street parking. w:�` 47 i i Ordinance No. 169 Page 2 10.52.04C Signs_ or markings 1ndlcatinq angle oarkino. A. The city traffic engineer as authorized by the city council shall determine what streets angle parking shall be permitted and shall mark or sign such streets but such angle parking shall not be indicated upon federal aid or the state highway within the city unless the Department of Transportation has determined the roadway is not of sufficient width to permit angle parking without interfering with the free movement of traffic. B Angle parking shall not be indicated or permitted at any place where traffic would be caused or required to drive upon the left side of the street. 10.56.020 Truck restrictions. The city traffic engineer 1s authorized by City Council m FT)iis s of an engineering and traffic survey, to erect and maintain official traffic control devices on any streets or parts of streets to prohibit the operation of trucks exceeding the limit of pounds gross Freight as prescribed by the Vehicle Code, _ provided that such devicer. shall not prohibit necessary local operation an such streets for the purpuse of making a pick up o- delivery. 10.20.010 Licreasln state s ead limit in certain zones. It is determine yTy ty i.oune reso cat on an upon the bates of an engineer and traffic investigati.:.. that the speed permitted by state law upon the following streets is less than is necessary for safe operation of vehicles thereon by reason of the designation and signposting of Ure sheets as through highways And (or) by reason of widely spaced Intersections, and it is declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice thereof: Name of Street or Declared Prima facie Portion Affected Speed Limit (mph) 1 Amethyst Street - -Base Line to end 35 2 Beryl Street- -Base Line to 800' north of Lemon Avenue 40 3 Ninth Street —Grove to Baker 35 4 Hellman Avenue —Alta Loma Drive to 500' north of Manzar.ita Drive 35 5 Arrow Route - -Grove to Baker 45 6 Sapphire Street - -Lemon to Dayan 40 7. Vineyard Avenue -- Carnelian to Church 40 z '.i( `J n L c t I i i X Ordinance ho. 169 Page 3 A 1. 10.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City Council resolution ana upon we bass of an engineering and traff'c investigation that tfie speed permitted by state law is greater than Is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it 1s declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth In this section on those streets or parts of streets designated In this section when signs are erected giving notice thereof: Ham of Street or Declared Prima Facie Portion Affected Speed Limit (mph) 1. Archibald Avenue -- Fourth Street to Banyan Street 45 2. Arrow Route - -Baker to Haven 45 3 Haven Avenue -- Highland to Hllson 50 4. Hellman Avenue -- Foothill to Alta Loma Dr. 35 S. Hellman Avenue-6th to Foothill 45 6. Hellman Avenue - -500' north of Manzarita to Valley View 40 7 Beryl Street -800' north of Lemon to Banyan 40 8. Beryl Street -- Banyan to and 45 9 Base Line Road- -Nest City Limit to Carnelian 45 10. Base Line Poad-- Carnelian to Haven 40 11. Carnelian Street -- Foothill to end 45 `® 12. Eighth Street - -Grove to Haven 45 13. Etiwanda Avenue -- Foothill to Highland 45 14. Highland Avenue -- Amethyst to Archibald 35 15. Grove Avenue -- Eighth to Foothill 40 16. Turner Avenue -- Eighth to Foothill 45 17. Sapphire Street - -19th to Lemon 40 18. Sapphire Street - -Banyan to end 45 �'- 19. Vineyard Avenue -- Church to Base Line 40 T 20. Nhlttram Avenue- Etiwanda to East City Limit 40 t SECTION 2: The Mayor shalt sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same, to be published within fifteen (IS) days after its passage at least once to The Oa�tlx rt RRe o�, a newspaper of general circulatiopublised -in the iity of ni�ntario�California. and circulation circulated in the h a aASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 1982 is ` AYES: HOES: ABSENT: X� r �r i ORDINANCE NO. i%L AN OF THE CITY CUV 4ONGA,tCCALIFORNNIA, AMEND NGLSECT ON 61.0219(b) O � THE MUNIC *PAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR REGULATION OF COMPACT CAR AND BICYCLE PARKING SPACES The City Council of the City q` Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby ordains the following: SECTION 1: Section 61.O219(b) of the Municipal Code is hereby aaenTe to add (1) (F) and (2) (L) as follows: (1) General Conditions (F) Required one automobile parkingrsdace pert 4 spaces of bi- cular parting tt. e a bile park n spaces or 5% f taw required ired an- g. _ woIcherer is less, (2) Mini" Design Standards (L) sitescmay tdesignate �up to ?0% of industrial theirparking stalls for compact ca^ use. Such stalls shall be not lrss than eia;c (8) feet wide by sixteen (16) feet indicated ca ed forusedbyycompact l carslo or nly. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shat cal use he same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least onc« in The Dail Report, a newspaper of circulatedrinlathe Citybof Rancho Cucamonga, California. and +• -_- PASSED, APPRUE0, and ADOPTED this day of . 19. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: I 9 J ap • i o� CITY OF RANCHO CUCA dONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 3, 1962 'f0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Eubbs, City Engineer SLBJECT: Ordinance 112 -A Abolishing the Industrial Local Drainage Area Attached is Ordinance 112 -A abolishing the industrial local drainage area and merging that area into the City -wide drainage area. As the Council will recall, Ordinanca 112 was established at the time the industrial area drainage system was revised. N'_th completion of Master Plan Revision No. 1, the entire City may again be placed on one common base with a single drainage area. It should be noted that with passage of Ordinance 75 -B raising the fees to $4,600 per acre, creates a city -wide fee identical with the current industrial fees. It !s recommended that Council adopt Ordinan`.e 112 -A and set the date for second hearing. Respectfully submitted, Attachment �a. • - iti a ORDINANCE 112 -A • AN ORDIWINLE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMHGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 112 ELINIIATING THE INDUSTRIAL LOCAL DRAINAGE .AREA The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follcvs: SEC -ION 1 Svatement of Purpose Ordinance W. 112 was adopted to reflect revisions to the City Drainage Plan which created the need to establish an "Industrial local drainage area•. The subsequent adoption of Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Revision No. 1 has incorporated the Industrial local drainage plan at the appropriate level of detail within the City Drainage Plan. SECTION 2: Repeal of Ordinance 112: Ordinance No. 112 is hereby rope -a e,�iminat ng the n usttr aiLocal Drainage Area. SECTIOd 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shat caT use the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The _tDaaii Re art, a newspaper of circulatedrin the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. and PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 1982. AYES: NOES: ASSENT* Turn —P U- rC5 osser, yor ATTEST Lauren M. Wasserman, C ty er Aj- �'ai7GY��1' ?d��Yr' v' w' .L:.i?�ku�%t7J.i��7f�"::�:[i:_ \ �' .., � •�xr '.i.:.`v 'k`;%Ki{d ` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COCA 5TAXi REPORT DATE: March 3, 1982 a Lm TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd D. Rubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Ordinance 75 -B Modifying Drainage Fee Attached for first reading is Ordinance 75 -H amending those sections of the Municipal Code governing drainage fees. Tho primary change in the Ordinance increases the drainage fee from $2,500 per acre to $4,600 per acre. This increase taflects cost changes related to inflation and recently adapted master plan revision. Two other language changes have been included: 1. The definition of drainage plan was revised to include revisiors or amendments adopted by Council resolution. 2. The provision allowing reimbursement agreements which was discretionary under the current ordinance has been made mandatory under the proposed revision. This change reflects exparience in the recent Mark III case and is consistent with the subdivision ordinance which makes reimbursement mandatory. The proposed $4,600 fee includes funds for contribution to the regional system. t RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve Ordinance 75 -H and eat the date for second reading. ` �cctfully apbmitteq, Attachment -t, r r' ORDINANCE NO. 75 -8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. AMENDING CHAPTER 13.08 OF ME MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO COMPREHENSIVE STORH DRAIN PLAN AND DRAINAGE FEES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1• 13.08.010 Intent and purpose. 13.08.020 Drainage plan and local area. 13.08.030 Fees- Payment. 13.08.040 Fees- Amount. 13.08.050 Fees - Deposit and utilization. 13.08.060 Exceptions. 13.08.070 Single drainage fee payment. 13.08 080 Construction by developer- Reimbursement. 13.08.010 Intent�and.r• —ne The city is seriously affectea by surface an storm waters and the continual subdivision and development of property within the city has placed a serious demand on existing . facilities which handle surface and storm waters. In order to plan and develop drainage facilities for the removal of surface and storm waters and to provide an equitable manner for the apportionment of the cost of the development of such facilities, the City Council does determine that a drainage plan must be adopted and a drainage fee established to provide funds to be used for the construction of the facilities described in the drainage plan. (Ord. 75, Section 1, 1979). 13.08.020 Drai R lam and local area. The comprehensive storm draln pans numbers an e Index and the appropriate plan sheets for the area lying within the city limits of Rancho Cucamonga, together with construction costs and other related material, which comprehensive storm drain plans were prepared by the San Bernardino ''•.y County Flood Control District, and all revisions or amendments subse- quently adopted by the City Council by Resolution, are hereby found and aeclared to be the drainsge plan for the city. For the purposes of this chapter, planned drainage facilities shall mean drainage contained within the drainage plan. The City Council finds that drainage problems are approximately of equal magnitude in all areas of the city, and declares that for the purpo of this chapter, all areas of the ci shall constitute one local drainage area. (Ord. 75, Section 2, 19791. A", zf J. ir° hKMa .+- "�1T��'^,i�t". ^- Pl4•k?�.'. �o :�i• _ • rM1 .. '.0 .. ..'Y•4Y ?afar -�v� t Ordinance No. 75 -B Page 2 23.08.030 Fees - Payment. • A. As a condition of approval of a final map, a parcel map, the waiver of a parcel map, director reviews, site approval, location and development plan, conditional use permit, or the issuance of a building permit, the city shall require the payment of a fee as provided in this chapter fur the purposes of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing planned drainage facilities for the removal of surface and storm waters from the local drainxge area. The City Cou%fl finds that development of property within the local drainage area will require construction of the facilities described in the drainage plan, and the fees are fairly apportioned on the basis of benefits conferred on the property to the local drainage area and on the need for such facilities created by the proposed division or development of property to the local drainage area. The City Council further finds that the fee as to any property does not exceed to pro rate share of the amount of the total actual or estimated cost of all facilities pursuant to the drainage plan which would be assessable on any parcel of property if such costs were apportioned un a per acre basis. 8 Fees required to be paid by this chapter shall be paid at the time of issuance of a building permit. (Ord. 75, Section 3, 1979) 13.08.040 Fees- Amount. A The fee required to be paid by this chapter is forty -six • 11 dollars ($46, per one one - hundreth of an acre or fraction thereof. 8 Except as otherwise provided to this chapter the fee shall be based on the area of the entire parcel with respect to which the building permit is issued. C If the parcel with respect to which the building permit is issued is larger than one acre, the fee shall be based on: 1. The area of the developed portion of the parcel. As used to this chapter, the phrase "area of developed portion of the parcel" means the area of that portion of the parcel lying within a single rectangle which encloses all improvements, landscaped areas, storage areas, parking areas, required access and required setback lines 2. Notwithstanding the provisions of subr•rvision 1 of this subsection, the fee shall not be based upon that portion of the area of the developed portion of the parcel which was developed prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, and which remains unchanged, provided, however, that this exception snail not apply once the total area of additions to structures, or new structures, constructed after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, exceeds fifty percent of the area of the structures on the parcel which existed on the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter. Ordinance No. 75 -B j Page 3 r: D. The amount of the fee and the Area for which the fee shall be considered paid shall be determined by the building official. (Ord. _ 75, Section 1, 1980: Ord. 75, Section 4, 1979). 13.08.050 Fees -Do osit and utilization. The fee required to be paid by Uiils c apter shall epos to in a planned drainage facilities fund' and shall be expended solely for the construction of reimbursement for the construction of drainage facilities pursuant to the drainage plan or to reimburse the city for the costs of engineering, planning and administrative sery ices to establish, design and construct the plan and facilities up to twenty -five percent. Initial funds collected may be utilized for specific planning and engineering studies as designated by resolution of the City Council. (Ord. 75, Section 5, 1979). 13.08.060 Exg Lions. Drainage fees shall not be required as a condition o�Fie issuance of a building permit for: A. Alterations; B Reconstruction; C. An addition to a single - family residence when the addition does not exceed six hundred fifty square feet in area; D. Construction of garages, carports, storage buildings, • patio covers, swimming pools, and similar structures, accessory to a single family residence. (Ord. 75, Section 6, 1979). 13.08.070 Sin le drain a fee a nt. No portion of a parcel sha a su ect to payment o a ra nage fee more than once. If a erainage fee has been previously paid with respect to a parcel, or portion thereof, credit shall be given for such prior payment, and a proper apportionment shall be made, toward any fee payment required by this chapter. (Ord. 75, Section 7, 1979). 13.08.080 Construction by developer - Reimbursement. Whenever the construction o p snneddrainagerac ties is necessary for the proper drainage of a subdivision, the city may require the subdivider to construct such facilities with credit being given by the city toward any fee payment required by this chapter If the cost of such construction exceeds the fee which would otherwise by payable with respect to the subdivision, the City Council will enter into a reimbursement agreement with the developer In the ev.nt a reimbursement agreement is entered Into, reimbursement shall be made only after the fee required by this chapter is collected in connection with a subdivision or development on other property in the area encompassed by the reimbursement boundaries described in the reimbursement agreement. The basis of reimbursement , shall be the developer's actual cost of construction of the planned drainage facilities. The term of a reimburseme.it agreement shall be as specified to the agreement. (Ord. 75, Secticn B, 1979) . :�3"r -a�.nz .; Vie. *,�"_AT.,. - .A;r<.- iC�:,�� -.•'. Ordinance No. 75 -d Page 4 SECTIOY 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the city Clerk shat cause a same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dail Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in th'tty of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucawnga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: F,` p D. osser, yor ATTEST Lauren Wasserman, C ty C er � ua4 `J �1 T® `Y • is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Ma. -ch 3, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, C:ty Engineer BY: Barbara Rrall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Ordering Annexation 08 to Landscape Maintenance District Nc. 1 for Tracts 9441, 11609 and Director Review 80 -34 Attached for City Coc.ncil approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation i8 to Landscape :Maintenance Distri ' No. 1 for Tracts 9441, 11609 and Director Review 80 -34. The developers have Dean notified of the public hearing and the posting has been completed. It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution ordering the subject annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the attached Engineer's Report. Respectfully LBH:B djaa Attachmen..a YX ,i I' i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NUMBER 8 TO LA11D- SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT HINER 1 FOR TRACT NO's 9441, 11609 AND DR 80 -34 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho :ucamonga did on the 3rd day of February, 1982, adopt its Resolution of intention No. 82 -22 to order the therein described work in connection with annexation Number 8 to Landscape Maintenance District Mo. 1, which Resolutwn of Intention No. 82 -22 was duly and legally published in the time, fo-m and manner as required by law, shown by the affidvvit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Irgrovement', was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as rer.4red by law, as appears from the affidavit of Posting said notices, on file In the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed tt be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention Ilo. 82 -22, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of tha City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, fon, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding art! concerning the necessity for the contemplated perk and the beneritf co be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,iurisdictioa to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to She district and the ordering of the work, and said City Council he.-by ,rders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 82 -22, be done and made; and SECT. I e ee it further resolved Enginee�is lUreby finally approved; and further resolved that the assessments and Engineer's Report are hereby approved. yfr RE" .- esolution Page 2 SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessnmnts shall not begin u7n`fTi ater 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 1982. AYES: NOES: Pa ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser.—TWOF ATTEST- Lauren M. Wasserman, CTtyZTe`FW m rp JM t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA f Engireer's Report for - ANNEXATION NO. 8 to the • Landscape Maintenance District Number 1 DR 80-34, Tract 9441, Tract 11609 SECTION 1. Authouity for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 9441, Tract 11609 and D.R. 80 -34 as well as on the lots directly ` abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shcum on the Hap as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the landscaping have been prepared " by the developer and have been approved as part of the improvement plans for Tract 9441, Tract 11609 and D R. 80 -34. The plans and specifications for the landscaping are in conformance with the Planning Commission. Reference is hereby made to the subject developments and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the ' same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto t' SECTION 4 Estimated Costs i; No costs will be incurred for pa:kway improvement construction. _ All Improvements will be constructed by developers Based on historical data, contract analysts and developed work standards, it 1s estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. - '0.M.... _ � M1 l i� 4 Engfneer s Report Annexation !8 Page 2 1, A�u• The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. l (including Annexation No 8 comprised of 13,326 square feet of landscaped area, is shown below: Total Annual Maintenance Cost $.30 % 250,014 square feet $75,004.20 Per Lot Annual Assessment 75,004 20 - 1342 lots 55.89 Per Lot Monthly Assessment 4.66 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached Assessment Diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation imoives frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeotmers association, these assessments shall be reduced by the amount saved by the District due to said homeowner maintenance - SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A ", by this reference the diagram is hareby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for Annexation No. 8 is found to be of general benefit „ to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel The Ctty Council will hold a public hearing in June, 1982, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the 1981/82 fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7 Order of Events I City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2 City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's report. ` 3 City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets a public hearing date. 4. City Courcil conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the,priceedings. x. S. Every year in May, the City Engineer.files a report with the City Council. s 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. �i2i, �� '.1kY,:C.- �= .:YY';•+:'w.f:,.G! • "; dr;{'`" �' ,� „'��'�ft'8 0 0 6 E r 0 ;'L 0 ASSESSMENT DIAGRI LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO.8 `L s� CITY OF RANCHO CUCfu \I( � : `•.'ENGINEERI \C. DIVISION dr� . VICINITY DIAP�'J u; _ A. title; DR -80 -34 t i t s I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTRICr NO.1 ANNEXATION N0.8 �.I N i e t s v title, Y r• R,�NCI -lo ccc,uNro,��c,� A TRACT ®`� NOS_ ; ENGINEERING DIVISION N -- :VICINITY ALP �2� Page w M.. " ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 8 rl ': tltltld _ , . i " r� CITY OF RANCHO CLG\V1O. \G,\ �r ♦_wr`s i; i C, ENGINEERING DIVISION vlclNln' AIAF =I `I 7 = i r rl ': tltltld _ , . i " r� CITY OF RANCHO CLG\V1O. \G,\ �r ♦_wr`s i; i C, ENGINEERING DIVISION vlclNln' AIAF =I `I al U a STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) as COUNTY OF SAN SERNIMINO) AFFIDAVT.T OF POSTING NOTICE OF IMPROVEMENT I, Lloyd E. Uubbs, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the duly appointed, qualified Superintendent of Streets for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that pursuant to Resolution No. 82 -22 of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, he on the 18th day of February 1982, posted the -Notice of Improvement• of the City Council's intent of considera- tion of Annexation No. 8 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 which notice is attached hereto and made a part: hereof; that Notices were posted not more than three hundred (300) feet apart in a conspicuous place along each parcel of property affected by Annexation No 8 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. DATE Sworn and subscribed to no this �, day 7t,". 1-t _... 1982 Notary Fu c U I ir ntonaent of Streets or the ty of Rarrho Cucamonga BNEOFC L RIY AN J AUTH T Hi • CALW04 UM d ter.., I i ks f 1 •�t i P F] S :. a C " Affidavit of Mailing: C I, Judy Accata, Engineering Secretary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga do hereby swear that I deposited in the City's outgoing mail located in the administration building at approximately 4:00 pm on January 27, 1982 the attached letter to Lesney Development Co. regarding Annexation No. 8 to Landacape Maintenance District No. 1 for Director Review 60-34. i y Ac t . Eng near nq Secretary DATED: 1— '?7 Sr r n C • Affidavit of Mailing: I, Judy Acosta, Engineering Secretary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby swear that I deposited in the city's outgoing mail located in the administration building at approximately 47D0 pm on January 27, 1982 the attached letter to the Kingslea Communities regarding Annaxation No. 8 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tracts 9441 and 11509. y A s a, Eng eer g Secretary tr DIZEDz 1 -a Z-O FS `� i' �y 0 Is I.TP{I At. D A linVA n"P AUANAA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 3, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Bubb$, City Engineer SUBJEI.'T: Alta Lama Channel Assessment District •y 4 , •�u For the past year, the staff has been working with the Building industry Association in an effort to establish an assessment district to construct the Alta Loma Channel. This past month the Association presented the City a petition from the owners of over 601 of the assessable area tributary to the channel. This petition would allow the formation of a District without preparation of a debt report under the provision of the 1931 Assessment Act. Staff has reviewed the petition and found it sufficient as indicated on the attached 'Certificate of Sufficiency'. In addition, all owners within the assessable area of the District have been notified about the petition and were invited to the March 3 Council hearing to present their views (see attached copy of letter). It is appropriate at this time for the Council to consider the petition and any other public input and to determine to proceed or abandon the project. If the Council chooses to proceed with the District, it should adopt the attachod resolution making findings on the petition and directing staff to obtain contracts from the consultants as set forth in the petition, together with a Reimbursement Agreement from property owners who will be con- tributing to consultant costs incurred in formation of the District. Tho petition indicates the preference of the property owner to Retain Don Owen and Associates as Assessment Engineer, Brown t Nazarek as Bond Counsel and Associated Engineers as the design firm for the project. The d ty has wotked previously with all of these firms And staff concurs in the selection If Council chooses to move ahead wit)i the District, staff hill complete contract negotiations with consultants and property owners to cover service fees and fundl..q At this time, it appears that approximately $200,000 will be required to bring the District to final formation. At this time, it is assumed that the necessary funds would be generated through developer contribu- tions and city storm drain fees. Developer contributions being creditable to future fee obligations. This is similar to the C4 S S' .Y+ � � �1 •ifs -Diit Chiinna%�1lassisaienL District ry QI d k� �• i _ S .x 'A �'• ' r'. , +..Y.�i:i•`'�_+�.•'(+.,i +4'2rY /.,7d li.A' � �{�ii��•J RESOLUTION N0. aP 4'l�7 :> A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING FINDINGS ON PETITION FOR ,r ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -2 ALTA LOMA FLOOD CONTROL _ CHANNEL WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (hereinafter referred to as "Agency "), has been presented an executed Petition by certain property owners requesting the con- struction of certain public improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith, said improvements to be constructed pursuant to the terms and provisions of the 'Municipal Improvement Act of 19130, being Division 12 of the Streets and High- ways Code of the State of California, in a special assesament district known and designated as: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -2 (Alta Loma Flood Control Channel) WHEREAS, it has been reported that said Petition contains the signatures of more than sixty percent (60%) of the property owners of the assessable area of the property to be subject to assessment for the proposed works of improvement. Said Petition meets the require - mants of Section 2804 of Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS POLLOWSs SECTION 1s That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That Agency hereby finds that said Petition has been signed by owners owning land constituting more than sixty percent (60%) of all assessable `> land Yithin the boundaries o! the proposed Asses. ment District. SECTION 3s That naid Petition shall be filed in the Iffice of Agency and shall remain open to public l,spec- tion. SECTION 4s That said Petition meets the requirements of Section 2804 of Division 4 of the Streets and Highwaya Code of the State of California. and further proceedings anal limitations under the provtsions of the "Special Assessment Investi- gation , Limitation and Aajorify Protest Act of 1931" shall not be applicable to these pro- ' ceedings. SECTION Ss That the staff Is directed at this time to obtain contracts from the consultants as set forth in the Petition, together with a Reimburse- it. ment Agreement from the property owners, all said r I= RESOLUTION NO. "'�Y11-' Page 2 ATTEST: Agreements to be presented back to this Agency for consideration and final action. SECTION 6s That said Assessment District and proceedings shall hereinafter be known. and designated as "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -2 (ALTA LAMA FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL) ". APPROVED and ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser, mayor e Y v e � T Lauren N Wasserman, C ty C er J c baidy view chapter 6lakkx7 ndwk- aswadnon of soutl e n cdfb(m roc. 'r &1'113 }i1Ca January 2S. 1982 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention, Lloyd Hobbs, city Engineer 3320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Lloyd, Attached are signed petitions by landowners within the Alta Loma Channel assessment area. Represented is 326 acres of undeveloped property (308 acres are needed). As we discussed in the past, this petition will affect owners of undeveloped property only and will not !number any cost to "lacing renideatial proper- ties in the assasanant area. We encourage the City Council to accept this petition as is and to proceed with this needed flood protection project. You now have a means by which to pay for this work. Please contact BU if we can be of further help. Best personal regards. G ten +� le Ex•cutiwe Olractor Atfw /kmp Enclosures. Petition to Council List of Petltionora Signed Petitions cc, Mac Brown Bob Mills Don Owen Petitioners kowun Ave S!^ A Ste 207 CA 91780 (714) 981.2997 or 916.2869 RewasenwV an of San SMardno CoOnyt •. 7!i An A41"wto d the RAMS and am Ct31A j TO& Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer City of Raacho Cucamonga PROMt Ken Willis, Executive Director 8L1 List of Petitioners January 25, 1982 Ac- res 40.0 6.89 22.4 12.3* 7.0 95.5 18.9 27.2 82.8 5.8 Total 319.59 acres *Corrected by City - - 319 9 t 523 42 - 61.06% Percentnga Calculation Petitioners 319.56 acres Assessable Land 523.42 acres Percentage - 319.59 61.05% 52 4242 e Calcustions JLM; Approved LBH ,aaaaa .a Alta Loma Channel Tract Developer 9441 Paul Coombs Kingslea Communities 11609 Paul Coombs Kingslea Communities 9649 MacKay W. Deady Landed 10045 -1 Sam Jingona Westland ventures 11625 Roberts Group 11973 Dick Scott Woodland Pacific 10046 E. S. Rosenfeld 10047 The Anden Group 10048 Dunitz/Leventhal 11701 Dominic Salvati (Shaffcr- Westland) January 25, 1982 Ac- res 40.0 6.89 22.4 12.3* 7.0 95.5 18.9 27.2 82.8 5.8 Total 319.59 acres *Corrected by City - - 319 9 t 523 42 - 61.06% Percentnga Calculation Petitioners 319.56 acres Assessable Land 523.42 acres Percentage - 319.59 61.05% 52 4242 e Calcustions JLM; Approved LBH ,aaaaa .a r L • I ` L . - • 70f CITY OF RkSM WCANDWA - Lbanimltar relamd M as - Apaney'i PETITI01 FOR THE COPISTAJCTIa OF IWP WD"- S AM WAITE11 Or REWIPEKHTS OF 01YISIa a OF THE STp M AND HlG41ayS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFC NIA TK 11INDI S1ofED. Constltutlog property ownsn of •ewy.lap.a arms within iM area of IM pn0ar1y as shown On 1M plat'"OCAW To "Is htltlam, Mich proysrty, ul II be subjscr To fM sswss,net for wins Iaprpy tt MMlmfhr r"AlMd, Mnby MgAS1 tow Insrr "t!m Ot protssdlp6 wear the prowlalms Of the ` AtCipal Insrowmont Act of 1913•, allay Olwlalce Ig of the Strasts and Hlphuys Coda at the Stah of California- for the Censtroctrm of ceef rth public works Of IproywsNlt, Icpather with apb"Fam" obas Ind eppvrtanent work la ceiwmtlm tMnelh. QOMMIIY msttlbad as Follows, , - TM Svwtruetlm and InshIlSTlm of urtaln dnlm" laprowewrnts, together with upertanancs,s am aceSlalflon. If MCGISary, to 1OPMae what Is Iwwwl Ss the ALTA IDwA FLOOD CWTR0L f)w1afEL, _ pmnl ly at the polnh and places as Shawn m the mp attach,f tafnM For further prtltulan, nfermta Is awes TO IN Ghlbits attmhm MraM. TK Lruv104111 OOHSEKT to OTMr appurtamnt work and ntcels ltlm tMt IS. In 1,w opinion of Apancy. neasury M globally "fecteste amid IprOVSant^ for iM t"fl• Of undoweloped Knape• me " Mnby abnssly wale the gn^aading$ and all Iisltstims .bar the `SPeelat ASSWS~t Inwttlpatlon, Lbltatlon sego majority - Protest Act bf 1971% Ming 01wlsim a of the Strwefs and Highways Cods, of the Shh of Caolfornla. TK LVOIRSIMM further nOwast the foliowlnpt , 1 That OOH CWEH S ASSOCIATES M apmfnim as ASSESSFM tMINW, and FIHNCIAL CONSULTANT, p. That F, IAACKDalf SAM (BR70 L NATAREK, Attorneys at Law) M 401w lnted as BONA CAMEL, 3. That ASWlATED ENOINrVU M appalatm as OESI01 E)IOINM. THE UCOtl10" further agres, M mks perlodlc Subelts with Apncy M gura'1t" the M net Of l Itlm on Cmmaltmh, me It 16 Ierthur aCkMwleegm that tMra p Agamy far 1M Paymnt of any aonwitlng Services unless then Is a aucussfol a tiewatlm Of Smis t and ale of hands. The proper" owners herby further agrw, upon alplp this.Pet)tlm to dadlatS all necessary rlghtsof +ay Or massagers, 46 dattrnlmd MWASSA" far uld wares of ' hprpvOr t, and ill "Id dedlutom still M aocvwpl lahm before the ordsrinp of the .ores of IprowONnt for "is asMSmnt district. We MntF Further raOwast that all efforts and Situate M wads, w that amid PM06"inp and the maulstlm Of Intantlm an M adntoo at the s,arl lmt tons, ihe undersigned proper" owwrs fertMr wefn IM thirty :301 day parlor as / awtherlam for the amynsnt of all Or any portico O0 the maws~ts, and udlwn the nOflCO Of remnatim Of the Isu$~? as sutWltN by Section 10404 of the Strmts and HipMays Coda Of the SDlto of Ga1110rnla. This Petition amt M slp"d In COUnwitart Sam ran6Tilutes Ora Petitlar, and Yainr, and my SO eanwllamtod .din similar petitions and wa lucre b similar Isproram," Mason mmT10Md. , Fm fM purpou of This Ntltlm. endayelOrm lard 16 SWIMS by those "us %Mega "COrdino M the 19p1 egussr Is role, the aswuorga Val" of land Sun 6 its "Sessoris wales of Iprwmwits. ' ♦4 ! %J.. Y' �'r ~� .. � .. — ,�� • � 1n LSD!) , wn•rf:•�r' \i %[� yl` .ems a _ .i. .M ..ay.. MIX 3 e3 G3 ' ga��TM 6EiV11V /IM —�_ Y ,r •� 1272t/tl Alta Lone brtA Aanal 1 of P.11. a GltTorala lfafted PartnarsAl7 44 27 Oe' kt v lb- 66U 66ard j In toot 67 U �• E{aSUatra Y4 Pavan 44,19 of Laadw Cwt wittoo San tarndlno County Several ►ntw (T.T. "619) �i K tC; ti • ,r l ' 1 !�.' F 71 V- .3c d)) OL MAL No AM —8 —MU=0 -M AM- VACANT 523.24 ACRU TENT. TAWS 337.5 ACKU PUBLIC UTIUTfES aov-rLAN- & VACANT, DEVELOPED • ❑ Pmnomms 4 VA I- Al N!P s I=,dfrtJt=- a ALTA LOMA%oJHANNEL Fw-g ii c— f ;11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' Ah J11 p 3 r ■! =R • f ti3R2TShrl w t[iiTt(t5 f2ttalATiOY [tars w txlznuana mmrst w w �Oaa1p)5m Tarr +N t, Malta . Wept first dal[ awn. Eap2Ya aM aa[af [ arrant" tb yatftim ptWOTN2 this a[tl[aTlt HN1L tb brrltory ahnss On the attatfi0 Wtltlm. 7L prams thYa a1QYwraa pettaar m aalA Mtltlm ars• to the bat of W tamlalts• prsats p[ fsnWq annn, tb within tppatS p[ tb flatrltt Yttppsad to b [ptyf. [ Q1mT ltxsaa tames tsouf w [rnlur Tsar m awue U s M mu".. Tbtvta0 Nit 25th par O[ 1MYrT at CalltaaNa. mtaM • •• mi it ... f,.. w; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �L ire ftMpD.SchL . bcc: Mackensie Brown O c� Amy CRrt Lleia &P kaw Ren Owen ea Willis Steve Wheatly OR City Council- February 23, 1982 THE FOLLOWING LETTER WAS SENT TO THE PEOPLE ON THE ATTACHED LIST Dear Property Owner, The City of Rancho Cucamonga has received a petition from land owners within the Alta Loma Cnannel drainage area (see enclosed area map). The purpose of the petition is to request the City Council to consider the formation of as Assessment District to improve tLe channel. You have been noted as one of the owners of vacant or is developablo lots within the proposed district which woull be assessed for the improvement. costs. These costs would be bonded and paid for with property taxes over a period of 10 or 15 years. At pre.ent, the estimated total assessment fee would be in the range of 55,000 to $6,000 per acre of land owned. The City Council will consider this petition for approval on March 3, 1982 we cordially invite you to attend this public hearing and make known your views on the proposal. The meeting will be held in the Lions Community Center Forum located at 9151 Base Line Road at 7:00 lea. I£ you have any questions about the district, the meeting or if you wish to add your name to the petition, please contact myself or John Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer at 989 -1851 or Dor.0wt i, Assess- ment Engincor at 752 -9082. a Cordially, CONHUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION LLOYD B. NUBDs City Engineer LB11ijaa iy yi s, Enc. _;'• POSTOFFICESOC607 • RA, iCROCI 'CAIIONGA.CALIFOR..NIA91730 • (7U)0Sf•IBSI Je�wi'1� <� f OWNERSHIP LIST - ALTA LOMA CHANNEL Assessor's I - Numher Acres 41 1. 1061 -51 -6 3.09 Thomas b Judith Stephenson, 7881 Birchwood Circle, La Palma .: 2. 1061 -55 -1 8.95 Frank Redondo (Trust): c/o W. Matsumoto, 1060 Yound St.' Suite 325, Honnlulu, Hawaii pfiW4 1%-ZMrj 3. 1061 -55 -6 3.35 Peter Tolstoy, 9540 Hillside Rd., R.C. 91701 j 4. 1061 -56 -2 9.23 Mahamnade Courah, 6454 Coldwater Canyon, M. Hollywood 91606 5. 1061 -56 -3 12.24 Vera Tolstoy, 9686 Hillside Rd., R.C. 91701 6. 1061.57 -9 4.3 Wiley 8 Margret Hartshorn, 5550 N. Archibald R.C. r 7. 1061 -57 -8 4.6 Daniel E Doris Tessler, 1311 H. First Ave., Upland 9.786 8. 1061 -57 -4 4.78 Wiley d Margeret Hartshorn, 5550 N. Archibald, R C. 9. 1061 -57 -1 3.0 Lyle b Ann Benton, 9611 Hillside, R.C. 91701 10. 201 -83 -1 5 18 First Baptist Church, P.O. Box 326, R.C. 91701 11. 201 -83 -2 1.68 William Milliken, 5647 H. Archibald, R.C. " 12. 201 -83 -3 1.94 Henry Busche, 5605 Archibald, R.C. 13. 201 -17 -10 10.6 Brentwood Land Co. 202 Fashion Lane, Ste. 101, Tustin 14. 201 -17 -20 21.05 J� 15. 201 -17 -27 22 38 Bob Jenson Builders, 226 West E St., Ontario 16. 201 -17 -21 5.49yysy� •17. 201 -17 -22 2.60 �p Srn_ lm r „eLjM1 18. 201 -7 -06 4.76 -Dtck-SCOtt-e/o-Vanuardy-R.G- 19. 201 -7 -14 19 33 Alta Loma Heights, c/o E. Sanders, 3900 Birch St., Ste. 1G4, Newport Beach 92660 ^20. 201 -7 -25 12 14 Dick Scott c/o Vanguard. R.C. 93.1f A•cL,L,(d A-Ue '21. 201 -7 -26 7.5 1 730 22. 201 -7 -35 6.28 c 23. 201 -7 -36 7.04 -TR7ICSCOYt c/o- {lenyuard; {l {; 24. 2C1 -7 -37 59 81 Alta Loma Heights, c/o E. Sanders, 3900 Birch St., -� Ste. 1D4, Newport Beach, 92660 a '25. 201 -7 -45 3 63 - Alts- 6oma•Hee ht; --tX- Sanders; 390Q�Birch-St. r Sttr-IG4; Newport Beach, 92660 25. 201 -8 -3 a 4 19.09 T!.Ie Insurance, c/o M. MclNllen, 340 W. 4th St., a San !a-- -•rdino, 92403 E27. 201 -8 -5 5 Magnus Syverslon, 5394 Hermosa, R.C. 91701 e ,28. 201 -8 -7 a 8 9.28 Darlene Tate, 10050 Hillside Rd., R.C. 91701 • `29; 201 -8 -9 4.12 Alan Grimly, 5360 Hermosa, R.C. 91701 Al Y .. - Ownership List, Alta Loma Channel Page 2 y,e Assessor's Acres Number 30. 201 -8-4 17.83 Phil 5 Jeanne Blane, 10050 Wilson Abe., R.C. 31. 201 -8 -6 9.78 Title Insurance, c/o M. McMullen, 340 W. 4th St., San Bernardino 32. 201 -8 -41 18.42 yy{gt.1p�O1T r€T. 34D '--San-tlernardino- "='--- 33. 201 -9 -3 9.5 D I c k -Scot%- C7WNalpUatd-, -7C 34. 201 -9 -16 9.5 Dick Scott c o a udrd,.R.C. 35 201 -9 -17 9.5 Dick Scott' c/o- VangULFd; R:C. 36. 201 -9 -23 19 44 -Dick - Scott- M- Va6f0ard. R.C. 37. 201 -9 -30 1.82 ' Jick-5cott- c"artgoard;-R:C, 38. 201 -! -18 5 Alta Loma Investments, 20701 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach 92648 39. 201 -9 -19 14 67 r _nts 20701 Beach �HunLMgton- .Be 2 40. 201 -9 -12 9.67 Donald 6 Maryaret Stoner, Rd. 3 Stoney Acre, Waynesboro, e 201 -9 -27 PA 17268 10: Edward. a Fannie Buzin, 10114 Lovelane Place, L.A. 90064 42 201 -9 -35 101 Wasland Venci Co., 1152 N. Mountain, Ste. 104, Upland 91786 43 201- 171 -37 2.5 John Matthews, 18235 Mt. Baldy Circle, Fountain Valley 92208 a 44. 202- 171 -25 3 36 R4chard d Freida Wilkins, 9893 Highland, R.C. 91701 45. 202- 171 -36 2.36 Emsrson Black, 320 Weed Ave., Stamford, Conneticut 06902 46. 7 2- 171-38 4 52 Upland Convalescent Hospital, 1221 E. Arrow, Upland 91786 47. 201 -251 -1 4 07 Glen Miller, 6171 Archibald, R.C. 48. 201 -252 -4 4 4 William Hammel, 1669 Euclid, Upland, 91786 •- 49. 201-251-9 9 1 Phill4p Zicarelli, 1250 Via Hit Cumbres, Solana Beach 92075 SO. 201- 251 -64 5 46 Donald Sonanno, 357 E. Van Koevering, Rialto 923;C 51. 201- 252 -21 a 22 8 9 Harry Holloway. 2727 De Anza Rd., San Diego, 92109 52 201 -09 -32 3 2 C.A. Esposito, P.O. Box 4072, Diamond Bar, 91765 53. 202 -17 -:5 1.2 Alta Lama Brethren in Christ, 9974 Nineteenth, R.C. _, y • 202 -17 -29 1.9 91701 r Laurel Hawker, 6655 Herplosa Ave. R.C. 91701 r55. 202 -17 -10 4.78 John Matthews, 18235 Mt. Baldy Cric., Fountain Valle ', Y. .. 92708 awl _ ... ;r€3 VCS ��4C.`�a.'i:S�''�'�vi4:ll'1ai5 �'Y •:.9' .�+i;iw�,i l.,_ y ��.Y+xni •§i`.4�� Y Ownership List, Alta Lama Channel Page 3 G 6 r i- 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68 69. 70. E Assessor's Number 201 -17 -26 1061 -601 -7 201 -08 -35 201 -07 -58 201 -07 -57 201 -07 -53 201 -09 -38 201 -09 -36 201 -09 -37 201 -25 -33 201 -25 -34 201 -25 -35 201 -25.36 201 -25 -31 201 -25 -26 Acres 6.89 2.5 2.49 3.2 2.5 1.25 3.20 1.05 i.5n .74 .74 1.34 1.34 58 5.6 523.42 - 32.42 (PARK] 491 00 ACRES Robert 6 Jeanette Matti.rn, 6275 Archibald, R.C. 917010 Paul 6 Cheryl McMichael, 9742 Leuon, R.0 91701 Wilbur Beyer, 9862 Highland, 4.L. 91701 Matthys Kooyman, 6433 Archibald, A.L. 91701 Kingslea Communities, 9014 W. Olympic Blvd., Beverly Hills, 90211 d, Robert 6 Donna Ernest, 5638 Amethyst, Alta Loma George A Elsie Kriegh, 9899 Hillside, A.L. 91701 Kennath C. Byrne, 12521 Grevillea, Hawthorne, 90250 James 6 97321 tynnsPowers, 1528 S.W. Bryeat, Albany, Ore. % Raymond E Sally Crabs, 1541 Coolcrest, Upland, 91786 -t -- YAnBu&rdsi2fii- a ;.v --Vanguard; -9 , 0 San Bernardino County Flood Control Winona R. iwiford c/o Norman Weekly, 10272 Marian Ave. Montclair, 91763 .Hinsn -M 0rw"Ieekiy,.J0232 -4w40" -Ave. HbntcT3Y1^ 9T76 Robert 6 Jeanette Matti.rn, 6275 Archibald, R.C. 917010 Paul 6 Cheryl McMichael, 9742 Leuon, R.0 91701 Wilbur Beyer, 9862 Highland, 4.L. 91701 Matthys Kooyman, 6433 Archibald, A.L. 91701 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ift Date: March 3, 1982 1977 To: city Council and City Manager Prom: Bill Holldy, Director, Community Services Department Subject: Authorization to award Survey and Map Contract for the Heritage Park design process to L.D. King, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $3,560. With the Demons Channel now complete and the clean up finished, the contours of Heritage Park are no longer subject to change by outside interests. We can now proceed to Phase II, design. The first step As surveying and maping. We solicited three local proposals and the results are as follower A. L.D. King, Ontario $3,500 B. Associated Engineers, Ontario $3,500 C. Linville /Sanderson /Horn and Assoc., $7,200 Rancho Cucamonga While "A" and "B" in dollars and cents are equal, examination of the attached bids will indicate that the offered work and product to be provided by "A" is more extensive than is the proposal by "B ". In discussions with the Engineering Depart- ment, they support that "A's" proposal would more fully lend itself to the design process. Further, we can "kill two birds with one stone" on this deal. Engineering was preparing to contract for survey work along Hillside and Beryl for future road and flood control purposes. This proposal, which exceeds the park boundary by 1001, will cover the necessary area for their work as well as ours for one fee rather than two. Engineering and Community Services will split the cost 50/50 on this contract. Bcttom line then is the l.mitcd resources within the Park Development will only be tapped for $1,780. RECD. L�fEt7DATI0N: Award contract to L.D. King, Inc., not to exeea 3,5 or the surveying of Heritage Park. As an aside, concurrently we are now beginning solicitation of design firm proposals for Heritage Park. The timing should be ouch that survey work should be completu about the same time Council makes selection of design firm. w /Attachments (3) °s ,f!1�1i <1 • L. D. KY,a, lnq - 517 h. Euclid A,wulw _ ' - Dnurio. Wifomq 01752 r tn4191fa Ia2 ENGINEERS/PLANNERS February 23, 1982 Mr. Bill Holley Director of Coan inity Services City of Rancho 'ucamonga 9340 Baseline Ruad Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 SubJect: Proposal to provide Topographic Eapping for a proposed park site at the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Avenue to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr. Holley: In response to your request for a proposal to provide topographic capping for the above referenced site. I am pleased to submit the following for • your review and consideration. Scope of Work: I. Provide horizontal and vertical control survey for aerial topographic mapping• The site is approxiawtely 1,320 feet on a side. 2. Provide two (2) sets of scribed chronoflex asap sheets 24'x 420, scale 1' - 401 with 21 contour interval, one (1) set screened and one (1) set not screened. Each set will consist of two (2) sheets, the southerly one -half of the site on one sheet and the northerly one -half of the site on the second sheet. The area to be co%ered by the topographic capping will be loot beyond the site perimeter. Compensation for the above described work is proposed as a fixed fee ccst not to exceed $3,500. The topographic mapping sheets will be delivered to the City within three (3) weeks after the site is flown. Weather is a factor in flying the site, however the site will be flan the first suitable day after receiving notice to proceed. .t:. Oin,„ IV ONTARIO Yd IIANTA ANA V i �' Associated Engineers COt1.luam cra. ENO)N m s a1a usr a iT11tt7 ONU1UM GUFORNIA 917" (7UI) sN.Ula -•x • February 18, 1987 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Parks Department Attn Gtr. Bill Holley Subject: Heritage Park Dear Sir: Reference Is mode to your request for o boundary and topographical survey, of Heritage Park Site. We would be pleased to provid, you with o 11 n 40' scale rap showing 21 • contours, boundary data and culture topography. The property corners would r be marked by 24 Iron pipe, As you may know we ore very familiar with the area having worked an projects an both sides of the site. The fee for the obovo work would be 33,$Q0. ;. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you again. Yours truly, !!Iv L.H. orccn LS 3007 LHN lln ..Z A i �.n MANNI ;� N6 ORSIONItt6 VEYINO "x3t�y111.E5.•?.:!.1 BUiI February 23, 1982 G City of Rancho Cucamonga C' Page two T As a suggestion, it might be helpful to the City in their planning efforts to obtain a 1• • 100' scale, 24•x 24' aerial photograph of the site. If a requested, the photo would be taken at the time of the,aerial topographic mopping• The cost 1s estimated to be $60, which is not included in the fixed fee quoted. Mr. Fred Hielen will be the Survey Coordinator for the project. Mr. Mielen has supervised survey crews and aerial mopping efforts for Caltrans in San Bernardino before joining L. D. KING. Since joining our firm, Mr. Mielen d has supervised our survey crews for boundary,construction, design and aerial mapping surveying. He post recently completed the construction survey for the City's project to realign Carnelian Avenue. -d The contours inside the walls of the Demens Channel will be included, even though not requested. These contours will automatically be given because of the nature of the aerial mapping process. - I hope this proposal meets with your satisfaction. I apprciate the oppor- tunity to propose on this work and if successful, we are prepared to begin work Immediately. Please let me know if additional clarification is necessary. Respectfully submitted, D. H. MAYS, P.E. Branch Manager DHM:sw n G }9 �Y }L " FFiY ' +¢ A x i LINVILLE -SANDERSON -HORN& ASSOCIATES CIViLENGINEERS• LAND SURVEYORS February 5, 1982 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Att: Monte Prescher Sub: Hertiage Park Proposal Dear Monte, 9697 AAROwADUT4'q)RC •H- 1Wlmlm'AKAWNaA G91n9 (714) 99R1211 CRY OF RA 7 U10 CUCEOJ10Nr COMM)"'ITT Ocl'E'OPWrNT OEYTA FE3 5 1982 AM 8191n i$ 1ll1111112131A 8 A and tAs we discussed, our survey crew will provide a x- section square. The boundary will be based on �ecordmdatayinformation. Transit sections will be taken at 50 loot+ intervals and %ignlficant breaks. Some of the area is qu7 -e steep. In these areas we will change from a grid method to a stadia survey to pick up the significant breaks. The area covered is on -s'te only Our hourly fees (tistedi below) Lwith oakNot To Exceedt0f1j$5.200.00. We map with w2�l contour dIntervalsubasedn on e ournhourlyafees 'oth a Not To Exceed of $2,C00.00 HOURLY FEES Principal ....... ......545 /hr. General Office..........S15 /hr. Office Engineer. ....538 /hr. Survey Crew(2- men).:....584 hr. Senior I chnician......S34 /hr. Survey Crew 3 -m ) / Technician.... .......526 /hr. Printing e" • 5103/hr. 9•••......... : :. :At cost Thank you for the Oppolcunity of offering our services. This looks like an interesting project and 1 am looking forward to working on it. S1erely, -4 Wobee rj o _ Licensed Land Surveyor �•RAN:ks ' i t C)TX OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT}°, C Datet March 3, 1962 -~ Z Tot city Council and City Manager 1977 Prom: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Subject: Authorization to make available for rent /loose housing structure on Arrow Park site As Council is aware, we have recently closed escrow on the 5 acre Arrow Park site. Development is not elated in the • immediate future. Therefore, and in consideration of the house located on the property, a revenue enhancement opportunity presents itself... that is, rent the house until park development occurs. _ We have surveyed the market and $375.00 per month would be about right for the size, age, features and locatiou of the house. Further, all the monay received would go into the • Park Development Fund for future development of the site. (Should that be 2y yearn down the line, that would provide an additional $11,250, plus interest.) neCOM.NeNDATIONt Authorize the Community Services Department to manage a property to the advantage of the park develop- ment as outlined above. E � WLNttw 5 co _ 1 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �- STAFF REPORT' P r Dnte& March 3, 1982 S � To, City Council and :ity Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Subject: Hermosa Groves park As of the writing of this report a few legal details involved in final negotiatiooe remain unclear and unresolved on Scott's end. They are expec:ad to be resolved by veek's end or the first of next week. At the time of resolution, f. detailed report will be submitted to you. ' Will keep p yo posted as more details become available. WIX nm fi i• i 10 ILI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 3, 1982 TO: Members of the'City Council and City,Tang -r FROM: ,lack Lam, AICP, Director of Com¢ unity Development BY Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH LESNEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR DEVELOP m units on the nor st corner of Lemon and ffa—ve-EW-enues BACKGROUND: In April of 1981, the Planning Commission approved the plan orT —the development of 117 apartment units on 8.3 acres of land in the R -3 zone located ou the northwest corner of Lemon and Haven Avenues. The project is being developed totally as an affordable housing project and meets the criteria as defined by Section 50093 of the Health and Safety code. Although the projects only distirctive feature is financing by CHFA. State Government Code Section 65915 -65918 requires local juris- dictions to either grant a density bonus or alternate incentives for Projects which contain at least 25% of the total units for person and families in the affordable category. The City's General Plan was adopted without a density bonus mechanism. Therefore, the City's ability to grant a density bonus for this particular project in accordance with State laws is not Possible. The other alter- native available to the City to meet the mandate of this law i_s t offer other financial incentives for the developer. Therefore, a Development Agreement has been prepared between the City and Lesney Development Company in accordance with G.C. 65915- 65918. - Attached is a copy of that Agreement which requires final review and approval by the City Council State law states that if a density bonus- - -' is not granted, that not less than two other bonus incentives must be granted for the development of the project. Staff has reviewed the various options available in granting other alternatives. The incentives listed in the attached Agreement are ones which the staff feels would least impact the City in regard to any direct cost. Previously, the Applicant was proposing such incentives as reducing plan check fees or Inspection fees, however, these fees are charged to pay for the direct cost 4ncurred by our service. Therefore , it was staff's recommendation that those kinds of incentives not be granted. Development Agreement with Lesney Development Co. City CoLnril Agenda March 3, 1982 Page 2 RECOWJ4DATION: It is recommended that the City Council review the Agreement for the con ^tion and approval and adoption. Respectfully c DWI Director of Development JL.KV:jr Attachment: Development Agreement 110 7 Oc 54, Wiv THIS AGIJ=31T is entered into t f . 1981• by and bete MOOOHAVEH PROVAn CO t a partnership Iberaluafter 'Woodhaves d the CITY 7 0 C0CAl10WGA. CALII09EIA, a municipal Corporation (hereinafter •City'), and provides as follows ' 1H ERL14, Woodhaven is the wmcr of 7.56 acres, more or less. of lanl situated within the City at the northeast coratr -- of Haven Avencs and Lesson Avenue, acre particularly described _ as Han Bernardino County Assessor to parcel ft. 301 - 111 -16 (1981- 71 assessment roll) (hereinafter the 'proporty'll ad, MWMAS, Woodhaven intends to build a ens hundred saran- , teen 11171 -unit lousing project (hesoluaetar the 'project') on the prcpartyl and. HH2HEA.T, Wodha4. A desiree to obtain sots, of the incentives • referred W in Sactlan 65915 of the California Government Coda , in exchange for oonstsaceing at least twenty -five percent ;751) V of the total units of the project for persons and families who arm in the categories defined by Sectioa 50091 of the Califon - n1a Health and safety Coda, and maintaining such units available to auch persons for not loss than thirty (10) y raw HOW. T1w0HE, the parties agree as follwt ' 1. Woodhaven Wall construct at lust twenty -five gr- ant (151) of the total Colts of the roject for ,or&cn, ad , families who are in the categories defined by Sectiou 50091 -- of the California YeAlth ad Safety Code. Said units are to- wtiwrd forred to heroin as the 'affordable units'. , l Woodhaven. for itself and its successor* and assigns, agrees that said affordable units will be maintained contl- Y. nuously available for such par"" and families fora peril ' Of not lees than thirty (301 yosr* after the da_es on wblch �•� Y M1 �r.:.'Y' J_4 , r • A� i , i r t each each affordable Units, respectively, is first occupied. 1. 1bodh6van represents that It has entered or will enter Into Agra is with the California wanting financing Authority (hereinafter •CHTW) to finance the project. ibodhavan warrants and "presents to the City that the CIRA, porsuant to the finance agnesent, has the right and authority to fully control W avail- ability oq and sat the rental rates for, the affordable Unita ' for a period of forty (40) years commencing free the data of to- pletion of said affordable Unite The rental rates shall be set Pursuant w scbedules published in the Federal Registec by the fnpartmant of Sousing and Vrban Development. a. in the avant rental rates far the affordable units Nate to be set in the manner above stated, and In the further avant that rental rates for thl affordable units are not set by � cKrA. tiara the City me y 7, b1 rasoietiw of for city Council, es- tablish free time to time rental rates for the affordable Unita, and paudhav„n, for itself, its suctcseora and assigns, &grass to comply with the rental rates establiehsl by the City. A" rental rate set by City hereunder shall not be lower than the last rental rates which we* published In the federal Regiecar by the Department of Rocsing and orb&% De"lopwant. - 9. in consideration of the foregoing, City shall (a) wales City beautification fees applicable to the p ":sec. (b) fresrw the City fee schedule &e it appIIv4 to the project to the schedolo in effect for the 1960 -01 fiscal year. A ropy of said schedule Is attached hereto " Z hjbit •A• and incorporated herein. (c) Establish A due data for any applicabla proj-et engineering fees as the date upon which the first ocoepant coves 7 into one of the affordable unite. ' (d) Allow saw of alterrutive :orm of coneeructior an the - project if such alternative faro of construction octet standard Industry building practices and are approved by am Val 1- , r • A� i , I ` I . x i City and CAA. T T. City, at its option. my terminate this AOrsement by giving written wtiw of termination to Wbodhatm. In the I event cometrnetion of the pmJos t is .sec commenced within one �• � � (1) year attar the date of this Agm— t.orin the further _ event that construction 14 not thereaAer diligently pgreaed to completion. _ S. in the avant legal action IS commenced by the City to enforce perfosatxe of any of the provisions of abls. Lgrar- sent. the party prevailing in such litigation shall be entitled. in addition to Such other relief as mmy he granted, w retever reawmable attormay's fees lncarred in the comneetion with any such litigation. including any and all appeals tbersfroA. P. ybis Agrwsnt shall he binding upon SOS shall im- nee to the beaefit of the Successors am aasigse,cf the parties. a WITNESS WMMOr, the parties be" essDated this Spree- _ sent om the day and year firs` above written. mOODSAgOi FFDPXR -.=. a amp Sys Sys LCM uvlwpmm? Co.. Partner Sys Sys _ .. CITY Or SASCSO COCAMCOOA. a moni- _. cipal corporation - Bys ATTEST, e� sty wt S. w :tt ,nw .�sy4 14181 T •. A 0.1SOUMON Of 114 CILT COLMIL Of nlr ClTr Or AAnalo CLCAIIOIOa. • �� CAItf000A, At40OIN0 IVSOWS7pf NO. 75.2$ I STANISNItO A CC1VWn3GITg M SaMO1t, a 1.0. ✓guild Formic a be fae paid the gullding Official mat forth in5the relloNnj Sebago. of but Total Talwstlam of York. 1Paa ' q S 1.00 - 2,000.00 $11.50 for the first $1,000.00 Verbatim Plan S1-SO far math etdltlonai 5100.00 A Yalaatim at rr4celm tkvmf. to and t' SM1udLAl 22.000.CO nlmtion. S 2.000,00 to I3.000.00 32.50 far the neat 52,000.00 pion $6.00 for lath additional or thrraaf. `te .ne taeldlt2 Su.o00.00 inc including S25 .00 i 25,001.00 to 10,000.00 5 270.50 for the first S25.CDO.00.pim $4.30 far each edditiace2.51;oro.00 or fraction thereof, to .d iticledut SSO.o00.00 S $0,001.00 to 100,000.00 5202,00 far the firer SSO,000.Cr plus $3.00 for lath additSacel $2.000.00 at frretlm - tkaraaf, to and loeludis5 5700.000,00 ' S 100.000.00 ad op $442,00 for the fir" $100.000,00 VIM $3.30 for laeA addltimsal $2.000.00 or fraction theraf. ..n.•."_..ya.+.w 1.1 flan Checking I" •. When the '"marine of proposed Ceasteuetim .steeds ma thousand dollara, .d •plan is ratcird to be anbMt%N, • Plan Checking fee aha11 be paid is the ==ding Official at the time of ,ohatt"S of place Said IIm chatting fee ,hell be peal to seranryfi" passent (73%) Of the bat141nj permit fat On fat forth In Settim I.O. ,y Additics" plan Checking made necessary by .w.-gu in plane Or Incomplue plan aubalsuim. S20 00 per poor for the estlaaeN time of eheel;ir.5 r! {tans. 1.5. Cmpllance 7aapectloce � Inspacttm, to dater"" compliance of .sitting tmstxuetim With applicabl, odes what mat included In an actIva. "ltd building peraft,aar iaepectlo , node eee:e9sar7 due to work act being ready . ties sp.lfled, or work not after prior written correction nett ee ......................f70.00 „• 1.3. Chang. of Occupancy _ mange of Occupant' Inspection ....... ... . ...... ..........525.00 .. Lt srleutN Sol ldinga Fees for Inspection of a sarutture to r.lecsss .ate or within the Clty. ,ba: x be 330.00 when IecaN within 25 allu of Gq Offices. plat 52,00 per mil. u In ascna of 25 mil" distance whrc located In laeua of IS Allen frm City j offices. ), I.S. Appeal of Abstracts Notice d Am appeal of a melee ta'abste a "bstadard or dangermn building ... SS0.00 :.. W I.G. Nech.nleal /emits A fu for each methanlcal permit the11 be •a paid to the RU1141.S official as set forth 1n the foltew! /g Schedule of Islas p. pT1 ✓.. rA i""��.'1 WIN •A• � - Pot tthe Lsaeata of eaoa v mlt ........... .........................5 7.00 .for the Installation ar "location of each forced air or gravity typo - tome. or humor, iaylea•ag ducts W Vesta attached to each oppil• says, up and lacludiai 100,000 Btu/hr •.•.,.....,•o ................. 6.00 For the installation or "IOeation of each toned-air ar gravity type foseaoea or burner. including chats end van" Attached to each eFpll. , .... a m 100.000 StuAr ... . .. . . ............ . 10.00 °•t'•'�" ..a far the Installation err "location of each finer turance, including y toot .................... ........... 6.00 For the l""Italian n "location of each suspended Mt"..rs_ ceased all hooter or floor snonted tmlt beater . .. . ... . ... 6.00 - •rfer the Installation, Itiautlos ar roptaeewt of sach appliance vast installed And net included in Y appltarca ►coatis . ... .. . :6.00 Far the repair af, olte"tion of, or addition to each kenting Il. •••� sere, refrigeration onit, cooling unit, absorption oats Or basting. coating. oboayptl". err vvape_ation eonlLg ayftee,lntldLg installation of eantrels regulated by the Cede . .... ... .... 6.00 Far the installation or "location of each ball" or cosop, sar to and including three boraryorn, ar cub absorption arm on and Lneldly' . 100,000 Bt./hr ........ ... . .. ....... ..... . 6.00 Far the latallstim a ralacatlon of each bailer or conpressai urn three ha"epoar to and Including IS harsepavar, a rach absorption pot" "or 100.000 Ito/he to and including 1.000.000 btu/br . ....10.00 For the installation car relocitim of eac% belle Or eaepressar awe , IS bor,"ouor to and Loetdtag 10 harssper", or each Absorption SPA to ere 1.000.000 sta/hr . .. . . . .. . .. .. ...... .. . x0.00 for the lestallstion a "location of each boiler or caw;tMear eve molding SO le!,rtepause, a( for /salt absorption `„(!".t;�;.M•:. • 10 Mrs peuer to and ter 1,000.000 SM/hr to sad including 1.750,000 Sta/hr . ...1.7.00 systn For the Installation a rdntation of each boll" or refrige "Uon ceapresser aver :0 Mracpwore or each absorption ryate ear 1.150.000 otv/br .... . ... . . . . .... .. ... ....40.00 *Far each sir handling ,Ic :a and SncldLS 10.000 Luble feet par aisute. SaeludLg ducts attached abstain . ........... . .6.00 Salina This fee /hall not apply to an air bail Ls swit ublth is a portion of a factory asse bled appliance, cea1Lg unit. e"� :ative eoe•ar or ablorpti.4 emit for ubieb a parole 1. "puird alatMarn 1. thin Code ' 1 far each air handling onit can 10,000 ell . .. . ... .. ... •10.00 • For each arapotativa cml'r Other than pa"ab1/ type . ........ 6.00 .. ,Tr each ventilation fan cnaheetd n a single dutL . . ...... 4.00 ' For each ventilation Ifno which is will portlns of any basting or air conditioning pate authorised by a peralL . . ..... ... 8.00 Far each *iteration to a drat pate . . ... ...... . 6.00 . •aY•^..Y•+• For each eeaaa "Lot pray baeth .. . . . ..... ........10.00 . 4er the iestallation of each heed Mich is +and'0y oatbealcal aaluust. including the ducts of inch Iced . .. .. .. ....... 50.00 for the Installation or retoestlon of cub denestte type incinerator .... I ..................... S o0 for the Installation or relveadon of each eonse "tat or industrial t/pe locloarLter ... . . .. . ... .. . ... ... 20.00 For each appliance or piece of ftaireent ralalated•by this Cede ' but net classes In ether appliance categories, of for uhich an ath-r M is listed la this Cda . . . . . ...... . ... . ... 6.07 1.6.71 Additional Iaspeetions Y When additional inapectlena a" and. necessary One to WTI net .. t being ready at the tier specified carr.'� due WTI net "Treated etto �Ji;: �•e t- 4r' mac r t' a. � after Prier .Witten errroctlan "tic*, an sddltlowal fee of t20,00 t • :_ way N requird by the tulidlnp Official prier to relaspectlew, 1.6.7 dlkemwlnl Flab Q •U ' ov nC Fees then plans are required a plan ch'ki., fn emu! to 757 of W [n shall be paid to eN WlidlnC altic /al at the ties of plan mNisslbo. 1.7 nrctr /cal Panit Fen i A fee for race ..Imtrlesl per ,t s►t•i be paid to the gulldlnt Official -ea set forth In the falluslet athadete of Foss, ' '"Penh issuance Fee for nth pomb. Issued 7 Servlcnt "For renlct of 400 V or Ina, wed rot over 700 ways, is rating, lncludlni I enter, each 10.00 Far services of 600 r or leas wad Over 700 ways. to '.am aePS, la ratint. Including I enter. ewe► MOO For 2.1m Over 600 • or new 3,000 WVS. in rating' Including 3 liter, each - 30.00 For each additional Otter S.00 - It" Au /dentlal gu11dL•tg - In addltt" to the frs far Vomit lemance and services u Outlined I. 7emlt IasaOua For . A Somlmt oo'lor nn, single, duple:, end eultiple faa::v detlting Far each square foot of gross noar am .0' -1frr buildings accessary to cep o,jdutIaI bnildiats ova. strutted le eOuJanatim etch these residential build&%# fee each aquae fort of $"as floor am .00S '�'•':"•`y Other Censtmctlen . In addition to taw fees far pomp Isaaenca wed • [ "feet Wilted abuse. fen for reaadbotlal additions and altsmtlou and other buildings shall N be lollerat Outlets and Fla:turas Foe recepeaclt. pitch, 112htiet rnslats. first 20 earl .So Additional, each .30 star llthttng flx,irm, avetns* or other Imp devices, first 70, rack Additivesl fixtures. each .30 For Pole or platfom nawted lithting Meares. each .30 For eaboealul. type lighting flatum us Metabolite. each ,SO • For fixed mldrntlal appliances Out ar,eooding 110', each 7.00 , ``Otte For ether "S of air eaedlttoasra and Omer notes ' • driven appliances hiving lar7or electrical m lets, eat poser bop nMo. For Yard factory -trod Woe- •eeldeattal appliance eat amdin 3 Pp. N or NA, both 700 "10rf4 Far other types of air tendittoners 1.1 other rotor 1 driven OFPllsnce haelnt latSa' electrical mtlrts, eaa paver apparatus. po.rr Apparatus For "torso Seneraters, t»nalerears, rectlfler'. eanrtou. C3P3cltuss, Industrial hestint, air coadlt;oun, ad Nat Pumps, cOuLing Our Ntlet equipment, and other slop"m, as fol lusst aatini 1e M, d, DA, or LVAA 7.SO Op to sad Iecldlnt 3. each I Ovcr I and ant Ovor 30, each S,00 I Over 30 and Out over t0, each 17.50 Over 50 ad net over 200, each 7S.00 • r N - a•• rr� -4. Over 100. each !Ml •I" equipment or .pplIanco'havlas .era than ono "lot. transforsQ. heater. .al.. thi w of tb, cmmbined vaunts nor be need. NOR, 7huo fees include all Switches, circuit br"xara!• . TGeteataTa, thers,nstatt, relan and other directly • .related control equipment usgys For trolley acs plug-in type bua.ays, each 100 test or f.actiar thereof 3.00, NMI As additional too will be rspolrea•for 112hitnt fistulas, motars. Std other appliance, that acv connected to cruller a.d•p2vg -1m type busways. No fee is raVirod for portable toolt. Sips ,• •• _ sits. eotune lighting and merga,ep ` For one sign Seal on, branch circuit, each _ 10.00 Far additional breach cira,lti, each 1.00 Oralrals and cir as ' For electric teversters •,nd.electricallr dri:m rides, each 10.00 For mechamically driven rides and wall- thrwgh sttracticai with lighting, each 3.00 Far area and booth lighting, each 3.00 Far permanently installed rides, booths. displays and -. .ttractions, vso 10117 FEE St72WIE 7uper.ry power ` wkor tearyarary aerricd polo arpdaatal and apptnrtenanees, each .,. 10.00 I" a toperary dlstributlee system far emsTructi® situ. decorative uthtinl. Christman, lees Wes lots, Qrewef s stood$, a.lu.boothf, •cc., ,acb S.00 Nlacelluroua V For miscellaneous condults and conduiters 15.00 Far awlamint peels. hot tube aed ecru. each 10.00 `NMt Swimming pool fee includes yyusmmpy nature. Integral • lighting fistulas, aM all .vlrknt and met ell ....Story for operation of seas• For additional - -- _ electrical cutlets at eq.1peent: an lllrr FEE S MMAZ above. 1.7.1. Other Inspections For an c1tra inspection made eecesswr do. to wart not being ready at the time spectflcd or due to wrh not toweled after _ print written mmtic., each 10,00 For inspection of electrical equipment for which na fee is hotel. at forth and for emerge.cy inrpe «tons for the tls,- consuaed per hour _ 10,00 With a mint® chart, for S boor or less - _30,00 1.7.1. Electrical Plan Chedlnt Yves When service switch $loe eased$ 0000 ampere, or 300 xItr m whee connected lead erleeds 400 sopemv, a plan cbec" Ica equal to 751 of the electrical pent fee shall be pan to the soildial Official at the tine plans am N!,Utted go, ch.chint. 1 7 1 Annual Metrical Nainten rrH'..•r: -.war: .. . once permit ll.dd - LS G.dtnt revolt has A fee fcr of 2nding perat sholI be paid to the Wilding Official .. eat forth 1. the felleving Schedule of rood: 0.11tr .1 Me .red i1❑ fee 30 cubic yard, es, less S 20 So 50 to 100 cubic Fords S 21.00 ` 101 to 1,000 cubie Fords S 25.00 for the first too cable 1 71 0 10,000 cubic yards yards plot $7.00 for each additional 100 cubic Ids or frectieo thereof S 23.00 far the first 1.000 ruble' yards, plus $6.00 far each aJditteul 1 ,000 cubic yards or $rsetien theme i 0: u Y r -3- r.n... .. Ls, 1 g the I V rerelts ' A fee for eAeh plrebint peralt shall be paid to the Ramat official al set forth in the follerint 3c1Mdle of Feast remit tsswne* Fed for each pdr.(t Issued 7.00 /For .1th rluabLac fixture or trap or set of natures no one trap (Intl.. let "car. drainage piping anJ backnou protection tbere- ..+ faro) 3.50 - Aale.atcr System enclosed rlthin Wilding stroeture/par drain 3.So r Far each cesspool, seepage pit or supplemental leach line systan 11.00 rqr each private savage disposal sstm 22.00 -Far each Wlldir.t sr�ar � 10.00 ✓For each voter hector end /or vent 3.50 /For each gas piping Systen of "a (I) to five (5) outlets 3.50 For each /ss pipial System of siY (6) or here. per outlet 70. For each Industrial mate pre.trssement Interceptor, including lea trap and vent, excepiing kitchen type gross* intercepters .functio; I'S do fleture traps 5.00 For installation, alteration or repair of uater piping and /or rater trsstment equlp.ent 330 For repels, or altentiea of dninato or vent piping 330 . for ouch love sprinkler System on any me nater Including backilor protection devices on torah. veto.'.te...enn Cl) ce nvs (S) 330 ' ^ For Y.caus treaters or backnou protective devices ed tL`Its. rats, etc., end U) to five (S) - 330 • Orar five (s). dick ,.70 ' L For swirebivg p'SVAIM, OPMeAing rater supply piping, backnov on MentiMention devices, drainage piping. but eaclW: f pool voter ar Son-piping 10.00 1.6.1 Additional Inspections Where additional inspection, are .ado necessary due to work not being ready at the time specifled.or due tn.uo,k *rot t. coeracted after prior written correetldn mile*, en additional foe of $20.00 •ray be required by the gullding Official prior to re-5nrpecti.o. 1.3.2 plunbint Ilan Checking Fees When plans or. required a plan eheeklag fee egad to 7sl of the plumbing permit fee shall be paid to the lullding official at the time plans an submitted for plan thanking. LS G.dtnt revolt has A fee fcr of 2nding perat sholI be paid to the Wilding Official .. eat forth 1. the felleving Schedule of rood: 0.11tr .1 Me .red i1❑ fee 30 cubic yard, es, less S 20 So 50 to 100 cubic Fords S 21.00 ` 101 to 1,000 cubie Fords S 25.00 for the first too cable 1 71 0 10,000 cubic yards yards plot $7.00 for each additional 100 cubic Ids or frectieo thereof S 23.00 far the first 1.000 ruble' yards, plus $6.00 far each aJditteul 1 ,000 cubic yards or $rsetien theme i 0: u O.titr of cut asd pill L. 10.001 to 100.000 cubic tabs 7142.00 ft- the tint 10.000 Cable yards. plus S 27.00 ter each sdditluu 10.000 cubic yards or traction them: 100.901 cable yards or stn 2395.00 for the tint 1000.000 cubic yards. plus S MOO for each allttim 10.000 cubic yards or fractiec Tamed 1.9.3 Gradiu5 Plan O.cllog posy • A trading plan checking fee So accarda.ce .tith.the Sallorlog schedule shawl be paSdt Quantity of C] t and 7111 Pte 30-100 yards 3 30.00 2011100 yards 100.00 303 -3,000 yards 200.00 1;WI -2.000 yards SSO.CO _ 2.001 -1.000 yards .300.00 3,001 -6,000 yards •330.00 4,001 -1.000 yards 400.0 �Ss001 -sod cap 430.00 Thl " of eat and t111 yardstes •hall be used in cospating • giidlog perms s.d•plan checll.g foes. 2.0 7Wn11s' XzyrgV'7L15 2.1 Sit. Appsoral 0 300:00 2.1 Director Para" ••1.2.1 Sic. 4-41 -psaut t.r1w 200:00 2.2.2 Sltas, addition. e2teratia.. 23.00 2.21 Coerdlnated osltaste eiga pass. 73.00 2.3 fislictoaa2 Da. y.asit 300.00 2.4 Sectors" Oc -P."7 7sat•.t 7.s 23.00 2.4.1 Sales OfI3a. c .lh Dapoalt 2,000.W 0.4.2 Ou-alts sub4lrl.ioo sip cash deposit a .lga 300.00 2.4.3 Off -aloe avbdirial. a15na nth deposit tot all sis" 300.00 2.5 Pl.m.ad Dsit D.r.lopucut 1.000.00 2 6 Ilioar Derl.tiae 30.00 - i �u 2.7 9srlsec. 200.00 2.6 Les ct ana, 300.00 + 23.001.c 2.9 Cs.er.1 71.. "..dse.t I.0W.00 2.10 SPesitle 71.. 1.000.00 'h.11 Tupr.r7 Caa.cructleo If tic. 400.700 •7.12 S.rlre .e.t.l "....at 70r00- 7.11 l.vivcnrantal IPPAct 9.poat Actual coot plus 102 2.14 Appeals 2.141 APp}•3 of a Director decisips 30.00 2.16.2 Ap7n1 of • 71...1.9 Cow1e61.. Petioles I 211.1 C� i �u k- s' 3.0 SO1tIY1Si0vV t ARcrt S. 1AT 17.[ .IR AFEMICK rfr3 • D AOVD Od - 7.1 A.rlf Hefeaa � • 3.2.1 imtatln 7r.tc 711t" 7H 3.1.2 Zmtatl,e portal M.p S 300.00 i 21,00 {Sa[ 3.1.3 !areal M, V.I,q 330.00 r ,•,.Vr••, f 3.1.4 Ut 13M A43.ata.,at. 130.00 3.1.3 C.rttfl.tt..f ee.pllam. 230.00 3.1.a PAT"t +umd a Lao 130.00 m acn.ae 3.1.7 7HHt3Te Hatt M•P APP-1 30.001f 1.00 /.era 3.1.2 7.rta1 MAP Appeal 200.00 ' 3.2.9 7,a Htl,e M.P Gte.,fe. Lteuc - 100.00 50.00. ]:LjU SebdpVt.t.[ k'Vee. 2La m{ ],lu H •� • 100.00 I cvq cmv. ]L32 m),Attu et 91eL H[lam 100.00 1.2 R., Ue<klne 7 - 3.2.1 71-1 M.p Q.tk1•8 pm 3 300.00 a 11.00 11et AT ti <D aNtlea attvl "At ♦ 203.2.2 . ?.real ! fm . vhlthe,ar L ar"..y •. 230.00 ♦ 13.001let Ac , - • 3.2-3 1•Pr.,.tae.t r," wL1-hh -COeL i 20f, fJ..����� er L greAtAx, Htlmt.d I.prermmt Y ♦ It2 VD1tD[Yef i. 9TH \i •` 2.2.4' j. . Ine.rine •1 • ^ ^,xwetlH 7u r ' 32 .! leyrwwm t -t m its 10. p¢ of lePremmf uat.a=c '71,000 " u .f LPre,..e.t "At ' .,er 1100.000 4.0 Marine S.tldlet, .b tT n - 'a L CT) x-.4.3 1... M,,,lne N S}. W H !m Mralt7 i x sefvra LHN[ t9a _ ' •••"It. t . dgHlt .f • .m ty D.µ•.. "Au zp.Ir. At be el the HtlautN mPm.. m ledrr he u ; twice eeAw,,a'm• m by f1Hep .fXai. c -7 Imo W d.. 24 vhith the Olt? -7 ...ti. ar ether prer,try v[ eha q'te •7 street, .Idev.lk, fire .pdemL Sech d*,,,it .D.0 ew, Da IH. il00AD .r a ttlfluu airy• tD.v City 7atine.r. 2emr.nce m fu. A th. efilte of the 4.2 Stw.H Me,ln f ! x A Q. fer•feur f Mme[ to of 3 II.00 to per ure,m -Well Dead ►� the .vklett `�• .PAIiu for •Dee.. •o, j., Wmit. H 7 PDIf<.vt 4.3 vide tn,dex Lx, thin feurmH fret - 11.00 per trvek. _ THR.m 14) feet a" ear. - 110.00 U .0 pH trvrk. 4.4 Aroma! pemft.x I.r 3 -0. m[ " b•• fwrtd feet SIS.t PPar mtk pr,p ur .t a). � 3? � 1k:4 i r ul 1 -s- 3.0 s•nir at LirsmerZbrt .d'3lbtldld•Sab. •M — 3.1 sep.lr er dwsomo7 thick br Mr. U.% at..WU b.4 by the City b•repalr feellttias Amoasd by a Costruter..teec7 as other , "m ad'Other eaars.ep wrk oba22 h cberitl far to oceerdaice vll the f.11wfss Wdulat 3.11 Imm risk is acraplishd 1.7 . raatractoe s.td by 0. f1t7.Alm ebsctw,tball be 0.. OM.W.bad b the ca.tract by, (a) Toreal bla- praradme. (16) Iaf.rsal DSi proedtss. W T.rd..' plus .fllafstretive costs, L the aseart of toeat7•.f1.. pereene (131) d the baste charge. , irbmo motaseaey repairs era auasrrutad isa to demote to'• CSty- fae31itles.by a Cwtractor. City um vtu be atatsd sea cbws.d at tba tbm preeaZIDs p.rstre vase rat. pa. utaDlLkd hr the drportaeat of eapl.yaut Yes -r*•. area. 31.1. tbm arkaidsd or sotool s1s wrk 1. acc.•p1LAd by C" • crew oclualtq •it7.a3a1pmt. _tba beet.'CUrl. shall be caputd as a w r.ptr .-bas" series Dorsal earkins Demo..- tabor, Wastes .."tog tba saved wrklas Demos• ' will-166 Wartd.at tlas and a ►elf ,(U1 t1w the labee rat" Itsted balw)t •� 'taMi'�e.ea Ifain[.ne. tacker I•., (•423 per bma- mefae.aaeea tarter 11 (7.00 par Ivor Za.lasut, Operator (7.30 per bear rptlPast Ifecba.0 $1.00 per be.e tad Operator (1.00 per bear 71.10 upesYleor 19.00 par Mot (.O llfanllsnnvs Peer d.1 +9•emn•d-CTeek Ctu ar A than. of sea dollars ($10) ••tar M v • er o td retvrn•d by the cutmo.rl. bank. -•• .. � ' �+^.+..^2 -• 2+r+6�Jq`f?4: -tales 61 -?..It, fee lallur• to Tat Lftm.. Tent A pemolt7 of I= par seatb of We ut.,o. f•. dw sD.0 ba p.14 ter failure to pay . It, .* .r +sable 30 days after ebr are Wu U. dos. ll. pmalt7 302 of Items& rase The C197 shall wuatc L a Yittae to the pm.lty do. aa7 C.C. fe.atr.a by the e.euslty u file It far ealle.eia f. a. learn... DA ink. -mo I eet far ast er nn•nte..d Lfern... 1 fn of (3.00 aMu M pld for tM repl.c osaot e1 lost or I..trgd Ilceasu. 1 1 a 7.0 7•e far Cemowfrr �..[tff ... foes Cessaaltj 1ua[tfiue/ea feu .full ba as I'll., 7.1 for each smile fa/17 sttue[un ad sulti -fear., atracar. or 1. Mal. natal. ar drtsltar7. 20 .seta par stow. too. at imea boudlos area "der scot, or tw bva4,aA dooms ms W *"% dllles volt. ublcbm e.n is the rrutar total a. JOE f • • • % r ray CA ty Ear. 7.2 ter each additlem, to a #"IUsg "it to a Into really, eoaAoftLwi s, a►artvost. dopl", or vailtIpl4wlIjU stoaara, or In a hotel " dor"rgrye vAjj additi. c,oalets at j30 ""wq feet or aura wader real, or whOch oddttlm create an odditLamal d«lltns Mit. 10 coat/ "r apara feet .1 st.'sa b.1141" area WeACT toot. " t hood,od dollars par "th dwIL1.4 volt. .4hlcb- 1. the &.ocar total 7,3 for each trailer sNn. tw *Amdrad dollar@ with " 4ddttla"l ova for say directly a,tessar7 Scructers, 1.0 Cast .1 1I.Lg Adjustment, ru.tag r.. ad S"41v vt. fora 8"d the baavUfiratlm 1*0 Shall.bs eabj.CL to . .1 eat of 21,102 4a)"too0t bead " the too "Sel"Ams U.1 ctearaear P.I. W.. ror "cpases of covpvutfco, the -+Im amth "rid /lull be freae lla..b to "A'Ch. Adl"tamt to best* with floret Year wcnv aad "lly N.,aofcez. PASM. AMAM AM ADVM thls _ds, of 2912. • • ATfMz CA ty Ear. 1 _ d�SYi • 1't ,s:c:x:z::n_:: s.::::zs- s:asssa:s sax ssssssssassa:aaaaa:sa:aa:asas z___::s x:c:sass:z:zzxa?: iizzzscissxc �i53s:czs$sis: F a � a: iii:$ "s33'sa. 333333333333 $iii$i$$iiii$iiiiii3333$$3 °t ---- =---- s:::s::cE:: s5a3------- ----- 3s3iisii$iiiiiiiii • i- -------- ---- -- - -s -z- - :sz__zssz:sszsssz : s e i •a ssisaas:es:ii —a? n. • n.try a i i• 8 y, cass: sasa 6 E w i • j...x_:a.s � G � � .� s ,s:c:x:z::n_:: s.::::zs- s:asssa:s sax ssssssssassa:aaaaa:sa:aa:asas z___::s x:c:sass:z:zzxa?: iizzzscissxc �i53s:czs$sis: F a � a: iii:$ "s33'sa. 333333333333 $iii$i$$iiii$iiiiii3333$$3 °t ---- =---- s:::s::cE:: s5a3------- ----- 3s3iisii$iiiiiiiii • i- -------- ---- -- - -s -z- - :sz__zssz:sszsssz : s e i •a ssisaas:es:ii —a? n. • n.try a i i• io y n a r� 2. STAFF REPORTS. A. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER a B. APPROVAL OF AMENDED AGREGTAT WITH CUCAMONGA COUNTY 37 5 C AUTHORIZATION TO GRANT TIME EXTENSION. It is recoamended that a 30 day extension of the statute of limitations with the Foothill Fire Prevention District be granted. 3. ADJOURNMENT. M � -� • .P� REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - AGENDA March 3, 1982 7� 1. CALL 10 ORDER. a. Roll Call: Frost., Nikels,, Palombo_, Bridge , ScUosser b. Approval of Minutes: February 17, 1982. io y n a r� 2. STAFF REPORTS. A. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER a B. APPROVAL OF AMENDED AGREGTAT WITH CUCAMONGA COUNTY 37 5 C AUTHORIZATION TO GRANT TIME EXTENSION. It is recoamended that a 30 day extension of the statute of limitations with the Foothill Fire Prevention District be granted. 3. ADJOURNMENT. M � -� • .P� r ' 4� i._ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1 ' Pabru;zy 26, 1982 6 !i TO: Redevelopment Agency FIM: Lacren X. Wasearman, E:ectuive Director SY: Tin Beadle, Senior Planner SUBIECT: ASroeas ^e Between Taxing Agaurisa Attached to this report are' the fallowing agreements which should be considered for %.proval by the Radevelopmen_ Agenry: 1. XMIDED ACRMMiT WrM TSE CGCAMUNGA COUNTS WATER DISTRICT. The Cucamonga County Water District agreement with the Redovalop get Agency was approved by the Agency at their last meeting; however, a few minor changes have :,an racomanded ty the Cucamonga County Water District in order to must their needs. These changes have been noted on a revised agrsament and do not affect any major change. The Agency has recommended approval of the anended agreement. 2. CUINO BASIN XMICIPAL WATER DISTRICT. The Chlnc Basin Municipal Water District has discussed with staff their revised agreement. This agremaut provides for the pans through to be set up through e special fund allSIbla for the Agency's use. Staff is recommending that the lgancy approve the draft agreement between the City of Rancho Luemmoogs Redevelopmrat Agency and the Chino Basin Mucicipal Water District. J. Ma,- ,otiotloos are still ongoing with the Fire District; therefore am extension of 00 days to the Foothill Fire Prevention District should be granted henewforth in order that negotiations can continue with the Agency. Staff recommands that the time., extension be approved by minute action. s UW:TA:ba M I� iF �z L I . rs u. ornc94 or BEST BEST 6 KRIEGER February 25, 1982 a� MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, CHAIRMAN, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCI Hamm, MCUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CITY ATTORNEY FROM: AGENCY COUNSEL RE: FINAL DRAFT AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATION BETWEEN TEE CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DLCTAICT, THE REDEVELOP- MENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Attached please find a proposed final draft of the • referenced agreement which has now been approved by Chino • Basin. The principal objective of the enclosed agreement is to protect the District from any, financial burden or detriment caused by the Rancho Redevelopment Project while at the same time assuring the Agency that opportunities may exist to other- wise leverage or divert tax increment monies that might other- wise have gone to Chino Basin Municipal Water District under a direct pass through arrangement. Under the enclosed agreement, all tax increment, wnether generated by the District's general obligation bond rate or the District's portior of the one percent general tax levy, will be diverted to the Redevelopment Agency. The Agency in turn will be obligated to allocate those b V tl r qyl� I ua anIccO or BEST BEST 6 KRIEGER February 26, 1982 • funds which would have otherwise been allocated to the District to the Rancho Redevelopment Project Sewer and Water Facilities Ftmd or the Rancho Redevelopment Project Nonreclaimable Waste Systame Fund The proceeds of the Rancho Redevelopment Project Nonreclaimable Waste Systems Fund would be automatically rebated to the District since P _ these taxes are attributable to a general obligation bond w indebtedness previously imposed by the District The proceeds of the Rancho Redevelopment Project Sewer and water Facilities Fund would be allocated to District through the procedures set forth in Section 3.3 of the enclosed agreement. This procedure essentially can- templates that District must adopt a proposed budget in- dicating the total taxes which should be allocated to District by Agency in order to alleviate any financial 'Y burden or detriment. The Agency will have an opportunity to review the Distric.'s budget and will then be required 9 to submit a written report and recommendation regarding the budget The Agency would be than legally obligated to remit takes to District from the Rancho Redevelopment Project Sewer and Water Facilities Fund, lose reasonable expenses incurred by Agency in the administration of the kv enclosed agreement. In the event District'# costs were reduced significantly by other sources of funds, the District wild -2- 3 i A IJ A MR arriecs or BEST BEST 6 KRIEGER February 26, 1982 be obligated to adopt an amended budget reflecting such reductions and thereby reducing the amount of taxes to be allocated to District. In addition, when funds accumulated by the Agency are more than sufficient to retire the District's existing indebtedness, the parties may terminate the agreement. Finally, in the event other redevelopment agencies within the District's territory agree to alleviate financial burden or detriment which their projects may have caused, the District would be legally obligated to agree to a complete pass through. We believe that the enclosed agreement will allow the Agency some opportunities to leverage tax increment funds and may in the later stages of this redevelopment project enable the Agency to divert all or a substantial portion of the tax increment which otherwise may have gone to the Chino Basin htmicipal Water District. The principal disadvantage of the enclosed agreement is the rather burdensome chore of acco+mting for and allocating funs; however, this process of allocation does contemplate an opportunity to bargain on an annual basis with respect to the allocations to be made to the District Finally, it is contemplated that the Agency would be compensated for its administrative Manses and staff has discuss..d the possibility of setting the administrative expenses at such a level as to recognize some disparities whi._h may exist in the existing tax allocatior -3- Vii' A A 0 JOHN E. BROWN -4- it 4.G. ✓.r". Qi'�.2. L `i7" - `"ter "Y "w olllcce or BEST. BEST S KRIEGER February 26, 1982 `« system by the result of,previoualy approved redevelopment tom: projects in the area which have not been required to pass through tax increment. If the enclosed agreement meets with the Agency's kt approval, it should be approved in open eoasion and the Mayor and Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency should be authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. Y JOHN E. BROWN -4- it 4.G. ✓.r". Qi'�.2. L `i7" - `"ter "Y a AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATION BETWEEN i THE CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY S OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1. PARTIES AND DATE. 1.1 This Agreement entered into in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, this _ day of March, 1982, between the CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, a public agency ( "District "), and the REDEVELOPKE,IT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a public body ( "Agency ") and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ( "City "). 2. RECITALS. . 2.1 Agency is proposing to undertake a • program under the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Sectior 33000 at sag.)* for the r redevelopment, replanning and redesign of blighted areas within City with stagnant, improperly utilized and unproduc- tive land known as the Rancho Redevelopment Project ( "Pro- f ject ") and requiring redevelopment in the interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of the people of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2.2 The District is in rereipt of Ordinance No. 166 adopted by the City Council bf the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on December 23, 1981, authorizing y Ae All subsequent r. :arences, unless otherwise noted, are to the California Health & Safety Code. I the redevelopment of an area within the territorial limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the Redevelopment Agency ' of the City of ancho Cucamonga. 2.3 District is an affected taxing entity which had general, Improvement District "C" and bonded indebt- edness property taxes levied on its behalf by the County of San Bernardino on all or any portion of the property located in the proposed Rancho Redevelopment Project Area in fiscal year 1981 -82. 2.4 The California Community ladevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, Sections 33000, et ssg.J autho- rizes redevelopment ageacies to pay to any taxing agency with territory located within a project area other Jun the ' community which has adopted the project, any amounts of money ihich in the agency's determination is arpropriate to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to any taxing agency by a redevelopment project. 2.5 District has submitted objections. to Project's financial impact and has determined that Project s will cause financial burden or detriment. t 2 6 District and Agency wish to enter into a cooperative agreement between themselves to provide mutual aid and assistance in the redevelopment of certain areas of City through the construction and opetation of regional sawar and water facilities ad District and Agency have a w common interest in and wish to facilitate redevelopment w�within City and to provide fir the cooperation of District • t • a ,�t s J • and Agency in carrying out redevelopment activities and ' otherwise alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to District by the Rancho Revelopment Project. 2.7 District and Agency recognize the need to provide adequate sewer and water facilities to serve the Project. District and Agency further recognize that the goalA and objectives cf District's regional sewerage system include not only the protection of public healtn, but also the enhancement of the entire area served by the regional sewer system by protecting the quality of existing and _ future water sources, by improvement of water management through integration of the various sources of water supply, including effluent, and by improving general conditions for industrial, residenticl, commercial and agricultural develop- ment. District and Agency also recognize that the goals and objectives of District's regional system are of benefit tc ._ the Project and the immediate area in which the Project is located and to the extent that there are no other reasonable means of financing needed sewer and water treatment facili- ties, Agency agrees to alleviate' any financial burden or detriment caused to District by the Project. — ,.- 1.8 District and Agency further raeognize -- that financial burden and - detriment has been caused to District by redevelopment projects in the Cities-of -Chino, Fontana, Montclair, Ontario and Upland which cannot be alleviated by allevisting any financial burden or detriment caused to District by the Rancho Development Project. r ■ ti 2.9 Agency has found and determined that it would be appropriate to alleviate any financial burden or �•.• detriment caused to District by the Rancho Redevelopment ' 7roject by. paying to District money to be used for those regional sewer and water facilities which benefit the Project. 2.10 District and Agency, in consideration of x these mutual undertakings, desire to settle their differ- ences and cooperative17 provide for the redevelopment of certain areas of City. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants contained heroin, the - parties hereto agree as follows: _• 3. TERMS. 3.1 Cenernl and 1my= ovement District "C" Tax , Y Allocation. Taxes stributable to that area within the territorial limits of District which would have otherwise been levied upon taxable property in the Project Area by or for the benefit of the District after the effective date of Ordinance No. 166 and which are allocated to Agency pursuant _ to Section 33670(b) shall be allocated by Agency, or in lieu _ thereof an equivalent amount of money from any source what- — -- - soever, to a fund of Agency designated "Rancho Redevelopment x Project Sewer and Water Facilities Fund" and shall be used ' to pay the principal of and interest on loans, money advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise) incurred by the District to finance or refinance, •hl Y� Agency pursuant to Section 33670(b) shall be paid by Agency -S- iv ' In whole or in part, regional water and sewer facilities owned, controlled or operated by District, which benefit the Project. When in any one year such loans, advances and indebtedness, if any, and interest thereof, have been paid pursuant to Section 3.3, all moneys thereafter received or accumulated from taxes, or any portion thereof, attributable to District upon the taxable property within that portion of such redevelopment project included within the territorial limits of District shall be allocated to the special fund of the Agency provided District has determined that there will be no future demand for supplemental •rods from the Capital Capacity Reimbursement Accounts. Such determination shall not be unreasonably withheld by District when it can be determined there will be no foreseeable future demand for such funds. Provided further that the parties may agree to additional allocations to the special fund of the Agency from the Rancho Redevelopment Sewer and Water Facilities Fund in the event District is maintaining a positive balance in the Regional Wastewater azA Reclamation Funds. 3 2 General Obligation Bond Tax Allocation. General obligation bond indebtedness taxes attributable to that area within the territorial limits of District which would have otherwise been levied upon taxable property in the Project Area by or for the benefit of thn District after the effective data of Ordinance No. 166 for existing general obligation bond debt service and which are allocated to Agency pursuant to Section 33670(b) shall be paid by Agency -S- iv v' into a fund of Agency designated "Rancho Redevelopment Project Nonreclaimablo Waste Systems Fund" and shall be used to pay the principal of and interest on loan -, money ad- vanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) incurred by the District to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, ronreelaimable waste systems facilities which benefit the Project. When such loans, advances, and indebtedness, if any, and interest thereof, have been paid, all moneys thereafter received from taxes attributable to District upon the taxable property within that portion of such redevelopment project included within the territorial limits of District shall be paid into the special fund of the Agency. r• 3.3 Time of General and Improvement District "C" Tax Allocation. Taxes which are to be allocated to Agency pursuant to Section 33670(b) and which are to be paid to District pursuant to Section 3.1 shall be allocated to the Rancho Redevelopment Project Water and Sewer Facilities Fund after taxes are allocated and paid to Agency by the San Bernardino County Auditor or officer responsible for the payment of taxes. Agency agrees that all such taxes which are so allocated shall be held in a separate Rancho Redevel- opment Project Water and Sewer Facilities Fund along with interest earned thereon until used by District for regional water and sewer facilities owned, controlled or operated by District. The Agency shall remit to and District shall use such taxes in accordance with the following procedure: 0 ;r, ' (a) On or before May 1 of each year, . the District shall adopt a resolution declaring its Inten- tion to adopt a proposed budget and specifying a time, not later than,August 31, and a place at which the District will hold a hearing on the question of the adoption of such budget. The budget shall be in two (2) parts, one part consisting of capital costs and the other part consisting of operation and maintenance costs. District's budget shall indicate the total taxes which must be allocated to District by Agency from the Rancho Cucamonga Sewer and Water Facili- ties Fund in the budget year in order to alleviate any financial burean or detriment. (b) Immediately efter adoption of the • resolution of intention, the District shall nail a copy of • the resolution and proposed budget to the Agency. The Agency shall review the proposed budget and, not later than 10 days preceding the data fixed for hearing, shall submit Its written report and recommendations of the Agency with respect to the amount allocated and, at any time prior to • the adoption of the budget, the District may maze such changes in the proposed budget as it deems advisable. _ (c) Not later than August 31 of each - - - year, the District shall by resolution adopt the budget and determine the Agency allocation. The several amounts of Froposed expenditures specified in the adopted budget shall be deemed appropriated for the fiscal year and for the purposes specified in the budget. The District shall adopt ry _ :, l ;e 4• 57, - 1 , - an amended budget to reflect the report and recommendations of the Agency with respect to the amount allocated, unless the District, batted on specific findings, determines that such recommendations will impair the District's ability to provide water and sewer service, that the recommendations impose unreasonable constraints upon the District with respect to fin, cing or time of construction of proposed capital improvements or that the recommendations otherwise impose undue constraints or hardships. (d) If the Agency fails to submit a written report and recommendations as herainabove provided, then the Agency shall be deemed to have approved the pro- posed budget. (e) If the District fails to adopt a budget by August 31 of any fiscal year then, until such time as the District shall adopt such budget, the budget last adopted and the allocation determined :herein shall con- stitute the budget and allocation for such fiscal year. (f) From and after adoption of the budget, the Agency shall remit taxes to District from the "Rancho Redevelopment Protect Sewer and Mater Facilities Fund," within 30 days after receipt of written request :herafor, in such amounts as indicated in the adopted budget less reasonable expanses incurred by Agency in the-adminis- tration of this Agreement. 3.4 Time of General Obligation Bond Tax Allo- cation. General obligation bond taxes which are to be J • allocated to District by Agency pursuant to Section 3.2 of f • • this Agreement shall be remitted to District within ter. days _ after taxes are allocated and paid to Agency by the San Bernardino County Auditor or officer responsible for the payment of taxes. District agrees that all such taxes which are allocated to District shall be held in a separate Rancho Redevelopment Project Nonreclaimable Waste Systems Fund b until used and shall be used by District for the purpose of expanding and improving the community's nonreclaimable waste systems. If necessary, Agency shall make and execute such i contracts and other instruments necessary or convenient to enable District to exercise its powers in order to carry out the purposes of this section. .` • 3.5 Special Tax. District shall be allo- • cated, in addition to the portion of taxes allocated pursu- ant to Subdivision (a) of Section 33670 and Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of this Agreement, all of any portion of the tax revenues allocated to Agency pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 33670 attributable to increases in the rate of tax imposed for the benefit of District which levy occ,3rs after the tax year in which the ordinance adopting the r44evelopment plan becomes effective. 3 6 Reduction of Tax Allocation. In the evert District's costs for the acquisition, construction, maintenance or operation of the regional system is reduced by amounts of any grants or other financial assistance re- ceived by District from the federal or state governments or it 9 3.8 Amendment of Agreement. In the event the Redevelopment Agencies of the cities of Chino, Fontana, Montclair, Ontario and Upland agree to alleviate any finan- cial burden or detriment caused to the DSstect by their respective existing or future redevelo =-at projects by paying to District taxes attributable f.a taose areas within the territorial limit of District which would have otherwise !_ been levied upon taxable property in the project areas of �3:�`i ±� � , _'-ter.• _ ,, -le i any county, city or special district, District shall adopt y • S an amended budget reflecting such reductions. 3.7 Redemption of Bonds or Other Indebted- ness. When taxes attributable to that area within the Project Area which have been paid into the Rancho Redevelop- ment Sewer and Water Facilities Fund or allocated to Dis- trict pursuant to this Agreement exceod thu amount due and § to be paid by District on account of any indebtedness in- r I� curred on behalf of the community, including, but not limited to, retirement of District's Reclamation Capital Fund indebtednesas Regional Wastewater Fund indebtedness or Nonreclaimable Waste System Fund indebtedness, District - shall immediately apply such funds to retirement of such • indebtedness, and /or redemption of outstanding general obligation bonds in a manner which complies with the terms of any bond resolution or other agreement budgeting or " pledging such taxes, and the parties may thereaftar termi- r 6 nate this Agreement. i 3.8 Amendment of Agreement. In the event the Redevelopment Agencies of the cities of Chino, Fontana, Montclair, Ontario and Upland agree to alleviate any finan- cial burden or detriment caused to the DSstect by their respective existing or future redevelo =-at projects by paying to District taxes attributable f.a taose areas within the territorial limit of District which would have otherwise !_ been levied upon taxable property in the project areas of �3:�`i ±� � , _'-ter.• _ ,, -le ..7ti. these respective radevelopment agencies by or for the ben* - fit of Distnct after the effective dare of their redevel- • • apnent plans, Agency agrees to ame.:d this agreement to provide for diieut payment to District of all those tests which would have been levied upon taxable property in the Prcj4%ct Area by or for the benefit of the District after the effective date of Orainance No. 166. 3.9 Mutual Assisrance. District will assist the Agency in the planning, financing, acquisition, construc- tion and maintenu:ce or operation of redevelopment activi- ties undertaken by Agency within District in accordance with applicable state and federal lax. District shall supply to the Cit• such information and reports as from time to time City may require. • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATED: _ Mayor ATTEST: qty fer ' REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATED: - Chairman - ATTEST: -- - Secretary ' CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL GATED. .� DISTRICT a DATED: - ,• A a. ATTEST: Yt t 'n Secretary +K�' K`jyM�s�.�•i. ?jo;�Gaf4%„Y�T b. _ �{u• y'i'y A��A I ammWed 2 -25-82 . ?u AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATION BETWREN p i•,i THE CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE y 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AHD THE - CITY OF L%NCHO CUCAMONGA - 1. PARTIES AND DATE. " 1.1 This Agreement entered into in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, this _ day of February, 1982, between the { CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, a public agency ( "Dis- trict"), and the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. a public body ( "Agency ") and the CITY OF &1NCH0 CUCAMONGA. a municipal corporation ( "City "). _ 2 RECITALS. 2.1 Agency is proposing to undertake a • proarrm under the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 at seg.)* for the redevelopment, replanning and redesign of blighted areas l within City with stagnant, improperly itilized and unproduc- tive land known as the Rancho Redevelopment Project d ( "Project ") and requiring redevelopment in the interest of health, safety, and general welfare of the people of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. L(, 2 2 The District i.% in receipt of Ordinance ?, A. No 166 adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho' 4- * All subsequent references, unless otherwias noted, are to the California Health & Safety Code. ,.. L. pm ` Cucamonga, California, on December 23, 1981, authorizing the z� redevelopment of an area within the territorial limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2.3 District is an affected taxing entity which had special bonded indnbtedness property taxes levied on its behalf by the County cf San Bernardino on all or any portion of the property located in the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area in fiscal year 1980 -81 in connection with District's Improvement District 63 -1, Improvement District 5 and General District. hints hV- 'OT%%7D og- Awdivar -Ge BrrttardYi[m —Char - DL-"v4vt--w4; }= delete i representing taxes which .±ii be lefted mid zMw laoied- on -DieOr open, % this, ths'RSnrtto Aadeva3opoent- ?refece -Area, 2.4 The California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, Sections 33000, at sea.) autho- rizes redevelopment agencies to pay to any taxing agency y,, p S with territory located within a project area other than the community which has adopted the project, any amounts of money which in the agency's determination is appropriate to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to any taxing agency by a redevelopment project. et 4 2.5 District has determined that Project "Rx will cause financial burden or detriment if District is not' - A,. �^ permitted to receive special bonded indebtedness taxes - y " • tyY�� v .b 4:��• 5. levied and collected on its behalf upon properties which a increase in assessed value within the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area. 2.6 District and Agency wish to enter into a cooperative agreement between themselves to provide mutual ` aid and assistance in .he redevelopment of certain areas of 1 � City through the construction of sewer and water facilities and District and Agency have a common interest in and wish to facilitate redevelopment within City and to provide for the cooperation of District and Agency in carrying out F redevelopment activi:ies and otherwise alleviate any finan- cial burden or detriment caused to District by the Rancho Revelopment Project. . 2 7 District and Agency recognize the need • F to provide adequate sewer and water facilities to serve the Project and have determined that such facilities are of benefit to the Project and the immadiate area in which the Project is located and that there are no other reasonable moans of financing such water and sewer facilities. 2.8 District and Agency, in consideration of these mutual undertakings, desire to settle :he* - etifvr- r dal.:ta r ease& —and cooperatively provide for the redevelopment of t c. certain areas of City. ` NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants contained hereic, the �. e parties hereto agree as follows: ?^y� 1 ? F�•a'; 'S9��:A �l��'�' .!n��',^•i].+Y.t]k�e h�;`'z" � " °• t 9'y M,'.tl!�i[�a� -Y�K TM� ■ 3. TERMS. 3.1 Tax Allocation. Special bonded indebted- ness taxes for existing debt service attributable to that area within the territorial limits of District which would have otherwise been levied upon taxable property in the Project Area b- or for the benefit of the District after the effective date of Ordinance No. 166 which are allocated to Agency pursuant to Section 33670(b) shall be paid by Agency into a fund of Agency designated "Rancho Redevelopment Project Sewer and water Facilities Fund" and shall be used to pay the principal of and interest on loans, money ad- vanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assured, or otherwise) incurred by the District to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, those sewer and water facilities which benefit the Project. When such loans, advances, and Indebtedness, if any, and interest thereof, have been pied, all moneys thereafter received from taxes attributable to Diut•kut upon the taxable property within that portion_ of such redevelopment project included within the territorial limits of District shall be paid into the special fund of the Agency. 3.2 Time of Tax Allocation. Taxes which are to be allocated to Agency pursuant to Section 33670(b) and which are allocated pursuant to Section 3.1 to the Rancho Redevelopment Project Sewer and Water Facilities Fund shall be remitted to District within 30 days after taxes are allocated and paid to Agency by the San Bernardino County -4- �J 0 �s iP i� Auditor or officer responsible for the payment of taxes. Agency agrees that nil such taxes which are allocated to Agency shall be held in a separato Rancho Redevelopment Project S,-war sad Water Facilities Fund until remitted to District and shall be used by District for the purpose of paying the principal and interest on indebtedness incurred by District to finance sower and water facilities in con- nection with District's Improvement District 63 -1, improve- ment District 5 and General District. If necessary, Agency shall make and execute such contracts and other instruments neressa or convenient to enable District to exercise its powers in order to carry out the purposes of this section. 3 3 Saecial Tax. District shall be allo- cated, in addition to the portion of taxes allocated pursu- ant to Subdivision (a) of Section 33670 and Section 3.1 of this Agreement, all of any portion of the tax revenues allocated to Agency pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 33670 attributable to Increases in the rate of tax imposed for the benefit of District which levy occurs after the tax Year in which the ordinance adopting the redevelopment plan becomes effective. 3.5 Redemption of Bonds or OtherIIndsbted- ness When taxes attributable to that area within the Project Area which have been allocated to District pursuant to this Agreement exceed the amount due and to be paid by District on account of any indebtedness previously incurred on behalf of Improvement District 63 -1, Improvement Dia- i I S i e 1� w� trict 5 and General District, District shall 1®ediately • ',i apply such funds to retirement of such indebtedness, and /or redemption of outstanding bonds in a manner which complies with the .terms of any bond resolution or other agreement pledging such taxes. 3.6 Mutual Assistance. District will assist the agency in the planning, financing, acquisition, con- struction and maintenance or operation oP redevelopment activitie3 undertaken by Agency within District in accor- dance with applicable state and federal law. District shall supply to the City such information and reports as from time to time City may require. 3.7 Mater and Sewer Svstem Facilities Agency and City agree that all water and sewer system facilities which may be constructed by Agency as part of the Project and within the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area shall be transferred to District and become parts of Dis- trict's water system or sewer system, as the case may be, and thereafter be operated and maintained by District. Agency and City further agree that all such water and sewer system facilities shall be constructed in compliance with Dist: r standard requirements. District agrees that it will accept all such water and sewer system facilities into its water and sewer systems and will thereafter operate and -i i�' ����m�vjP���� )'S�'"i}+c�K.x:4i•,�' °fir, :+• 'T ' -`:''� -mss ✓'t. "� ?.�« ,J' ; ti maintain same as parts of each systems. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATED: Mayor ATTEST: —c —ary- CRT I REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATED: Chairman ATTEST: Secretary DATED: ATTEST: Secretary AS d �l ;7 • r•��` -�s ' t F ayq March ?, 1982 V�tYY 1 ' YA CITY OF RANCHO rdMO CANOA 51�.1. CITY COINCIL kIMWIES , Rexular Maetlaa •t' 1. CALL TO ORDER, l� The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held In the Lion's Park Community Conter, 9161 Bese Line Road on Wednesday, March 30 1982. The mating was called to ordor at 7303 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser. Present were: rAUncllmn Jams C. yrost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, Arthur N. Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser. .. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wessera,a; :eeistmt City Manager, Jim Robinson, Assistant City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Coemnity, Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Rubbs; Cr4c unity Services Director, Bil' Holley; and Finance Director, Marry Ezpay. Approval of Minutes of February 17, 1982. Mationr Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to approve the minutes. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 2. ANNOUNCOOM a. Councilaan Hikela renounced that ha had good news regarding transportation. He stater that the 1246 Commission had mar informal}., at staff level and approved a list o projects which gave a conaiderabLi weight to San Bernardino projects b COnacllmn Mikels also announced that at the Sanbea meatier this date, a cornitee meeting was held to nominate members for the LAFC position that In being vacated. He stated that a meting to select a replacement will Lake place ten days after April 13th (April 23rd) and that any of the Council - mea could petition the Mayor to put their " "-r up for consideration. Councilman Frunt suggested that at the first mating in April, the Council con up vi.h an edorsemnt from the Council as a whole. _ d Jim Robinson. Acting City Clark, annaunced that Item S -C has been removed from the City Manager's Report. e Mayor Schlosser announced that there would be an executive sessir to discuss matters following the mating. f. Councilman Bridge requested that Item "m" be pulled from conatat calendar for discussion, since comvunity concern had been expressed. 9- Councilmen Palombo requested that Item "b" be removed for clarification and discussion. 3. Consent Calendar Itom "b ": Authorization to Request Proposals for Design Services for Hallman and foothill Slgnalizatlon and Drainage Improvements. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, discussed the need for design services. He stated the cost eatimce for the improvemnts was $350.ca0 to $400.000 to be abated with Caltrana and that it would take at 1 %asc a year and a half for the lmpiovemnts to be completed. Ieem "m ": Agreement with B.C. land Coepaay concerning Advmca id Ralmburasemt of Funds for Engimeriug Work in Connection with Assemwenr Dis- Ict 79-7.. re ti M1M1 n TT,tY,}�ri'�Fi,t^ i':- % . 1.„4. M�z City Council Minutes_ ..a v March 3, 1982 f Page Two "t i After a brief explanation of the R.C. Land Agreement by Lloyd Hubbe, City �- t Engineer, Mayor Snhloaser opened the mating for public input. � • Jim Banks Indicated he Cslt uncomfo:tablu with debLor /creditor relation - ship between City and major developar, stating that he felt that it .y. ,'it the City in a co-7romising position. He also inquired about the $59,000 that was owed. .+� Bob Dougherty, Assisted City Attorney, responded rhar this typo of agrep- /" rcnL is quite cot on and does not create a legal conflict of Interest. j Lloyd Hobbs stated that the $59,000 was a portion of the street improvement . r plane that were done as part of the project prior to the City entering into a contract with tb% design enginner. He stated that In the eventuality of an as- asa,aent district, that money would be a pre- pa,aent of easeeaments from the developer. ' s Ken Willie, B.I.A., stated that the City had entered Into reimbursement agreements before and that Its a very common prattles with moat nincipalitles ib end county governments. Councilman Bridge stated that he personally did not Ohara -Jr. Banks' concerns and felt confident there would not be any conflict of interest. �r a. Approval of Warrants, Register No 82 -3 -3 for $311,962.30. E b. Authorizatiro to Request Proposals for Design Servieer for Hellman and Foothill Signalization and Drainage Improvements. It ?s recommended that Council authorize staff to request proposals for design services for W goallzatlon and - almage IWrovements at the intersection of Hellman Avenue sad Foothill Boulevard. t c. Acceptant,, of Ioprovement and Maintenance Agreement for Parcel Map 4511. It is reco.amended that Council accept the subject Agreement for Parcel Map 4511 to -ated on the south aide of 9th Street, vest of Archibald Avenue submitted by Sebastian Filipi. RESOLUTION .70. 82-47 ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR 5 P M. 4511. d. Release of Lien Agreement and Acceptance of Lien Agreement - Stephen Butters- located at 9:60 Snonette Avenue. i. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -40 "Y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING AREAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN ACAEE !ENT FROM STEPHEN BUTTERS. iv OESOLUTICN NO. 82-41 {A, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COI-NCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A 'k REAL PROPERTY LRRTAzMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM STEPHEN BUTrLAS AND AUTHORIZING .` THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. h n. .17 . f e . ��i `,rWg.yyq+y,r1ivj}5ty: "11 ,r ' , City Council Minutes March 3. 1982 = Page Three e. Intent to Vacate Unracessaiy Streets and Alloys within the Victoria Itoject (Tract 11934). It is recomesnded that Council declare its intention to vacate the unnecessary streets and alleys and not date of April 7, 1982 for public hearing. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, COUNTY OF SAN AERNARDI110, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE UNNECESSARY SaREETS AND ALLEYS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PROJECT AS HEREIN DESCRIBED. f. Set public hearing data of March 17, 1982 for Tentative Tract 11615 - P.D. d2 -02 - Lewin Properties. g Set public hearing date of Mach 17, 1982 for Comity Devalepneav Block Grant Program for the purpose of deciding funding. h. Set public hearing date of March 17, 1982 for .:eeeral Plan amendment 82 -01A - Lewis. A request to amend the land Use Politics of the General Plan, that would allow the City to consider development plans within a Planned Community area, prior to adoption of the Planned Community. 1. Set public hearing date of March 17, 1982 for General Plan Amendment 82 -OIC - City of Rancho Cutamruga, A request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan to change the land use designation in the area fronting 4th street extending approximately 1400' earth between Etlwaeda Avenue and the AT 6 SP railroad tracks. This land use desig- =ties is recommended to be changed from heavy industrial to general Industrial J Approval of a Loan to the Redevelopment Agency. RESOLUTION NO. 82-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LOAN TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA RDEVELOPNEXI AGENCY OF $50,000 k Intent �o Vacate Oak Road, east of Amethyst Street and want of Klunman - Leonard Tyke. Request that public hearing date to consider the subject vacation be set for April 7, 1982, RESOLUTIG4 NO. 82 -43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOr A. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SLATE OF CALa^^RNIA, DECLARING ITS MENTION TO VACATE OAK ROAD LOCATED EAST OF AMETHYST STREET AND WEST OF KLUSMAN AVENUE. (V -016). I. Authorization to Request Proposal for Materials Testing and Construction Surveys for Assessment District 79-1, It Is recommended that Council authorize staff to request proposals for the above referenced services. n. Agreement with R.C. Land Company Concerning Advance and Reimbursement of Funds for Engineering Work in Connection with Assessment District 79-1. It is recommended thdt Council approve the agreement with H.C. Land Company and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the sans on the City's behalf. • - _ v .enaM�A , • - _ v .enaM�A ji.,' 7 :{d' -'ij7t •� a 8 ",.., r :`'. -,nip _ •R .'t....` S) ''11'RR.. j ~l�-X. ' 4' C1[y Council Minutes March 3, 1982 ;^ Page Pour 7... n. Authorization for Community Services Department to Attend a One -Day Emergency /Disaster Training Seminar. i Recommendation= It is recommended that Council authorize th:ve repre- ,: sentatives from the Commsnity Services Department co attend a one -day workshop in Lm Canada on March 19 on how to put on "Earthquake Prepared- ;• noes Programs" for the gemeral public. Cost to be $125 per participant with funds charged againaL the Management Development Account o. Alcoholic Beverage License-- The Circle X ,.orperatlon No. 1029, 10110 Foothill Blvd. for oft -sale beer and vine license. `j. P Release of Bonds and Notice of Completions r a Parcel Nap 5803 - located on the southwest coiner of Raven Avenue and Lemon Avenue Owners None and Associates Iaprovement Security (road) $86,000 - ,� • Parcel Map 4762 - located at 6th Strea and Lucas Rancho Road. Owner: Westwards Properties. YV Faithful Performance Bond (road) $86,000 • CUP 81 -04 - located on the veal aide of Vlnayard Avenue, south of 7oothill Blvd Owner: Vineyard National Bank. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $47,000 • Parcel Map 4595 - located at the northe83t corner of Haven Avenue + and Jersey Blvd, Owner: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. Monuaentation Bond $ 4,000 • D R. 80-39 - located at the Southeast corner of Jersey Sea Utica. Owner: Robert Manufacturing Compnoy. Certificate of Deposit $ 7,500 ABSOLUTION NO. 82-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNLIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTtNC. INS STREET INPROVEHMF FOR PARCEL MAP 5803, PARCEL MAP 4762, t AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 81 -04, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WM. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS :a Acting City Clerk Robinson read the title of Ordinance No. 169. Ordinance 169 (Second Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C%LIFORNIA, AM0NDIhG SECTIONS 10.04.D70. 10,04.00, 10. 010, 10.20.020, 10.40.010 ;. A 6 B. 10.52.030, 10.52 .�O, 10.56.020 OF TITLE 10, VEHICL' "`O TRAFFIC. ;f t 14 City Councll Minutes< March 3, 1982 - Page Five Motion' Moved by Palambo and seconded by Bridge to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 349. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hea.itZ. • E.U. Bauare, 8357 Belle Vista indicatud ha was opposed to raising the speed limit from 35 to 45 on Baseline between Carnelian and Turner. He stated that ho was a teacher at Alta Lam High School and discussed the traffic hazards in the vicinity of the school. The Council indicated that they shared Mr. Bauer's concerns and discussed how the increase in speed would actually help to enforce speed limits in the vicinity of the school through the use of radar. Captain Nickm explained that raalar could not be used at the present spec! of 35 since the reduced speed limit in front of the high school was considered a ^speed trap ". therefore, he indicated that the only way they could presently enforce the speed limit was by "pa tng" the care and he explained why this made enforcement difficult Lloye Hubbu, City Eagincer, reported that !be proposed speed limit increase on Baseline between Carnelian and turner us to 40 m.p.h. and not 45 m.p.h. He stated the City had done a special traffic study on Baseline and one of the actions recomamaded was a traffic signal at Baseline and Beryl a He—L Hempel, 9505 Brseline, discussed the need for a crosswalk oa Baseline in the virtnity of the 7.11 Store and Sizzler's Restaurant. a Jeff Crawford, student rt Alta Loms High School, talked about the difficulty of making a left hand turn into the High School Parking lot at 7:30 a.m. In response to Councilman Prost'a request, Paul Rougeau, Sr. Civil Engineer, discussed traffic statistics on Baseline and studies that have been completed. • Anita Hellman, student at Alta Loma High School expressed her concern about Increase in speed, and requested additional signs to varn drivers that there is a pedestrian crossing and semi save of lighting of signs since crosswalk Is also used at night. Lloyd dubbs, City Engineer, that the City unuld look at signing again and puesibllity of night time lighting, and will ..tins to work with high school. There being no further response from the public, Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Councilman Bridge, seconded by Frost to adopt Ordinance No. 164. Notion Carried unanimously 5-0. Councilman Bridge requested that Captain Yickm increase speed onforcement during heavy pedestrian hours. 4B. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 82 -01. An ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment 82 -01 modifyiag Section 61- 0219(b) of the Zoning Code providing for regulation of compact car and bicycle parking spaces. Acting City Clerk Robinson read the Title of Ordinance Nu. 172. ORDINANCE NO. 172 (Second Reading) AH ORDINANCE OF 771E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CCQWNCA, CALIFOPHIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 82 -01 MODIFYING SECTION 61.0219(b) OF THE ZONING CODE PROVIDING FOR ae(nn.ITTON OF CONP4CT CUR AND BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. R.+ �4 i r t e- A' L r i ,f. i` t :r S' C_ , C1ty'Council Minutes - March 3, 1982 Pnge-Siz .r Motion: Moved by Palcmbo, seconded by Nikels to verve further rendinb of Ordinance No. 172. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Schlosser opened the mating for public hearing. • Kay Hatlo�k, Levis Rome, stated they did not oppose adoption of Ordinance, but suggested it could go much further than it did regarding compact cars. She said they hoped to open the question for further consideration in the future. a Ralph Levis, Levis Home, suggested that tno ratio of compact care night be higher than 2OZ. a Ken WIlLis, P.I.A. suggested a possible future ---A ent to the Ordinance to in^reasa OZ ratio if, after further study, it proved to be valid. Tack Lnm, Director of Comernity Deve7 :pmnt, stated that when work began on the revised c.Vrehensivo zoning ordinance, the question of parking would again be cadressed. There being no further response f•vm the public, Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing. Notion: Moved by Palomho, seconded by FroeL that Ordinance No. 172 be approved with stipulation that review procedure be brought before Couu.11 when packing issue is studied under the revised Comprehensive Znalog Ordinancj. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. At this point, the order of the Agenda was changed and (tern 4D was diacussed next: 4D AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING THE DRAINAGE PEE It in recommended that Council approve Ordi .... e No. 75 -B Increasing drainage fees from $2,500 per acre to $4,000 per acre. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, _ reviewed staff report and presented elide presentation of i:orm damage during recent years Acting City Clerk Robinson read the Title of Ordinance No. 75 -B. ORDINANCE NO. 75 -B (First Reading) AN ORDL %:AHCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 13.09 OF THE MNNCIPAL CODE RENATrVI TO COMPREHENSIVE STORM DRAIN PLAN MD7 DRAINAGE FEES. Mottos: Moved by Frost, seconded by Hikela to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 75 -B. Motion carried unanimusly 5-0. Mayor Schlosser opened the meting for public hearing. a Ken Willie, B.I.A., requeated delay of first reading at least 30 days to give tim for one or more public workshops to discuss cost of proposal line by line and to review why the City felt there is no other possible way. a Kenneth C. Byrne indicated the he arced a 3 3/4 acre parcel at the top of Hermosa and that he thought cost was staggering. He also requested &Mm sort of workshop. '.dam a Y' City Council Minutes March 3, 1982 Page Seven a Clara J. Hurillq, 13235 victoria, Etivanoa indicated her oppositlon to the assessment fee since property awaro who build are already required to subLIt tope maps And complete etrnet improvements for fmnwge of property for drainage. Mayor Schlosser pointed out that every time you add a roof or paving, you add to the drainage problems in the City and he stressed the City's duty to protect Ufa and property in tba City. a Ralph Lewis, Lewis Nome, indicated he agreed with Ken Millis and requested a study period. a Ken Millis, B.I.A. suggested theca be some study regarding how redevelopment roads could used for draimSe. improvements. _Y a Alan Lovy, Lesney Developerat, referred to logisistion which requitac that any increase In fees gout elate to an increase in service. a San Aloof, owner of property on Hillside and on Highland asked if this assessment pertained to homeowner who is not going to developer his land? Lloyd Hobbs respon3ed that this fee is paid at the time a building pewit Is taken out and is only arsessed m that portion of land that is to be developed Hn vlaborutsd on the difference between street Improveants and storm dratn improvements and the cost involved. He noted that payment to mother aasensmeot district, such as Alta Loma Channel, discharges owner's fee obliaetlon. Theta being no further response, public hearing we closed. Motion: Moved by Mikals, seconded by Palonbo that Ordinance 75 -B be tabled pending study sessions between City staff and various private interests and be brought back mfrre Council when appropriate. Notion "tried unanimously 5-0. Motion: Moved by Falombo, seconded by Front to table Item 5-C (Ord. 112 -A) sinci passage of this Ordinance is cmtL:gent :•pon passage of Ordinance 75 -B. lotion carried umnimusly 5-0. Councilmu °rose suggested that the first study session be tentatively scheduled for Marto 18th anA that interested parties contact engineering for confirmation of tire and place. N:yor Schlosser called a recess at 9:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9116 p.m. with all members of Council and staff present. 4E ORDERING AYNEKATION NO. 8 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACY 9441, 11609, AND DIRECTOR REVIEW 80-34. It is recommended that Co:.ocil order the annexation of the subject projects to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer, presented staff report. Acting Cfty Clerk Robinson read the title of Resolution No. 82 -44. y RESOLUTION NO. 82 -44 A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANHERATION NUMBER 8 L TO 1..WSCAPE MAINMANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR TRACTS 9441, 11609, AND DIRECTOR REVIEW ,.. 80-34. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to valve further reading of Resolution No. 82 -44. Notion carried unanimously 5-0. �.�I • y.'-- >`K -q 4,:.• v' — xh.. .,e ' City Council Minutes . F March 3, 1982 - Page, Light Mayor Schlosser opcned the meeting for public hearing. There being no a r .epessa, public hearing use closed. p' Notions Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to adopt Resolution No. 82 -44. Notion carried umsnimusly 5 -0. 4 4F ALTA LOMA CHANNEL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Lloyd Hubbs, City Eagimor, reported that the Building Association, had presented the City with a petition frog the owners of m=er 602 of the ssssss- .,, able area tributary to the Alta Loma Channel requesting the formation of an t assessment district. r nS Dom Owen, Aesesamnt Engineer, reviewed the procedure that would be followed In developing the district and how assessments would be levied if the district Is established. He noted that during the process, may problem would have to be worked out, me of which involved the subjact of developed v.s. undeveloped land. 'r Ken Willis, B.I.A., discussed soma of the advantages of forming as assessment district and his willingness to work with landowners. Councilmen Bridge expressed his concern regarding chose small landowners who are farming their property. ` Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hoaringt a The following wall property Owners of ons to ten acre parcels, indicated they did met plan to develop their property and wera opposed to the rr district: Peter Toletcy, 9540 Hillside Road (also represented Vera Tolatoy, 9896 Hillside) Barbara Crimely, 5360 Hermosa Sam Aloof, Highland Avenue George Creed, Highland Avenue Darlene Tate, 10050 Hillside Road - Henry Bechar. 5506 Archibald a Harry Holloway, 2727 DeAnta, San Diego, stated he felt assessment we unfair. a Kenneth C. Byrne, stated he planned to build one day and was opposed to the high sssesr t fee. a George Kreigh stated that there we no evidence of any washout in the channel In 1969 a Jim Meyers indicated on the mp the area that he represented and stated their access road, which is Almond, is affected by a portion of the district, and presented a petition from the residents asking to be included in L a district fur the purpose of fosmiag a road improvement district. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Acting City Clerk Robinson read the title of Resolution 82 -45. RESOLUTION h'0. 82 -45. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, MAKING FINDINGS WM PETITION FOR ASSESSMEHT DISTRICT NO. 82 -2 ALTA L@U FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL. CcUntilmon Bridge stated that the Council shared may of the on concerns expressed by the property owners and felt that there can be a solution to mom - of these problem. He stated that because of the real need for this project, he felt the process should begin. rCity Couaeil Minntea''. March 3, 1982 1 n�vt`" �{' _ ' ,w�,i+ - Page Sins i✓✓ . y1 1 Aotiont loved by Bridge, secondad by Frost to accept petition and begin ` proses for forming assessment district and to vaiw further reading and adopt Ramlutloa No. 82 -45. Prior to voting on the motion, Councilman Frost stated that we are beginning A process that will gain arsentua as it goes on and noted the difficult part will be determining who is a developer so opposed to a landowner. Councilman Mike" stated that the City's experience with the assessment district process will lend to its ability to address some of chess concerns. He stated that the process will take place over a long period of time, and during that period he waa bopeful that the City could complete something that would be of benefit to the entire community. At this point a veto was taken on the motion. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Schlosser called a brief recess at 10:25 p.m. Mayor Schlosser called the meeting back to order at 10:40 p.m. with all members of staff and Council pressor. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STOP REPORT K 5A. AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD SURVEY AND MAP CONTRACT rOR ME HERITAGE PARK. r Prior to discussion of this item, Councilman Frost stepped down from his ' Council Beat. Lill Holley, Director of Community Services, presented staff report. Hction: Moved by MSkels, seconded by Palembo to accept staff recommendation and award contract to L.D. King, Inee, not to exceed $3,560, for the surveying of Heritage Park, Ayes: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge 6 Schlosser Ncest None Absent: Front Notion Carried. At this point. Councilman Frost returned to his Council scat. 5B AUTHORIZATION TO REST /LEASE HOUSE ON ARROW PARK SITS Bill Hollcy, Director of Commanity Services, presented staff report. Motion: Moved by Mikels acd seconded by Palombo to authorize Community Services Depac•ment to manage the Arrow Park property and rent or lease the house located on the property until park development occurs. Motion Carried 5 -0. k SC HERMOSA GROVE PARK -- This Item Was Remo -eJ. tava:.w nu. o•rAa . u+ units on cue norcoweec corner or umn am navan + Avenues w Jack Lam, Director of Commenity Development. reviewed staff report. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Paloabo to approve agreement. Motion 'r carried unanimously 5-0. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT. There were none s A W Y W r, r. a� MEN f i City`COUnell Mtnutaa March j. 1982 Paga,Tcn, 7. AD10URNHEWr :., SO zU, v, Motiont Maw d by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to adjourn to Executive Session at 11200 p.m. Motion Carried unsnimously 5-0. Thu City Council meeting reconvened at 11220 p.m. with all meabers of - Council present. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Micela to adjourn to Rodavelopmat locating. Motion carried unanimously 7 -0. The Council mating adjourned at 11120 p.m. w .- Respectfully Submitted, Qnay Zientara Acting Deputy City Clark a 3 t :r. C t t: M :• ;1�-5� �ri.��'�'jw'4i:�', ^j�:i. _`s.f.. -r ..- .�1°t fir• �t� 'map i��+kwrs f .Rj•'`r �- , t - t . fry, h3 r Pereh 3. 1982 y� RANCHO CUCAMONGA RZDEVELOPMENT ACISCY HTNUTES •�`-"t r.; 1. CALL TO ORDER ., Meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelepaent Agency met on March :s, 1982 following the regular meeting of the City Council• The meting we called to order at 11:20 P.O. by Chairnan `hillip C. Schlosser Present were agatcy M.tnberet Jamee C. Frost, Jon 0. Mikelsa Michael A. Palombo. Arthur U. Bridge, and Chairman Phillip D. Schlosser. Also present weret Executive, Diractor, Lauren M. Wasserman and Attorney John Brow. 2. STAFF REPORTS 2A. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH -NINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT. John Brow reviewed the agreement and responded to quartions raised by Council. Motion: loved by Hikels, seconded by Front to approve the agreement with the deletion of "along with interest earned" on page -:ix, Section 3.3. Notion carried unanimously 5-0. 2B. APPROVAL OF AMENDED AOM24'NrT WITd NCIIM''GA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT . . ,n Brow reviewed the changes in the agreement which were reflected in r isad copies distributed to the Agency Members, In addition, to be consistent with the deletion Bade on the Chino Basin Municipal Water District Agreement, he reeonmendad that "vtth interest earned thereon" be deleted no it appears in various sections of the Cuctmongi County Water District Agreement. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to approve the amended agreement with Cucamonga County Water District with the dalation of "with interest earned thereon ". Motion carried o"a,+m.usly 5-0. 3C. AUTHORIZATION TO CZANT TIME ERfENSION It is recommended that a 30 day "tension of the statute of limlations with the Foothill Fire Prevention District be granted Motions Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to authorise the time extension 30 days to April 7, 1982 mating. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 3. ADJOURNMENT Moticnt Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to adjourn to executive session, not to reconvene Motion Carried. 5-0. Krating adjourned at 11:63 p.m. Ragactfully Submitted, Ginny Zle cat %ra Acting Assistant Secretary