The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982/04/14 - Agenda PacketCITY OF Ra.VCHO LOGCa'AGA INITIAL STUD'! PART I - PROJECT INFORMAa'ION SHEET -- T' ba romplatec by applicant Environmental Assessment Ravi,w FOP: $7:0Wq 57.00 For all projects requiring 4av$rcnmintal review, this form must be completed an.' aubmltted tv the Davelcpaent Review Committee through --no dcF.rlmen- where the Project application is made. :vn receipt of this application, the Environmental ..:alt -sia �,ta'f will prepare Part II of the Initial otudy. The De,s„lopme,t Review Committee will meet And take -.lion no later then ten (10) days before the public mc.;ing at which time .:he project is to Le h^-ard. The Committee wi13 make one of throe determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will t.avd an environmontal impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, o. 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning AS the proposed project. ) ' TPCT TITLE: P.M. No. 7350 .C'ANT'S NPAE. ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: _ �n =ha i.anA tb. 7661 Densmore A".. Van Nuys. Calif. (213) 994 -5656 NAME. ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO HE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: welter A. Nenti and Pierre A. Elrn ' 7661 Denamcra eve.. Van Nuys, =f. 213) 994-5656 i- LOCATION GP PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO -i Sodthvest corner of Gth 6t. r; Utica St. ,• 210 - 081 -07 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LC�AL, REGIONAL, STATE `A6 A1 TD AGENCIES D THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: - - ` } None A; ,.€ , tied' •¢ f_ PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: It is proposed to divide existing 10 acre parcel in halt. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: + 10 acres gross There are no existing huiidin% d none nronoaed. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOR1,1ATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREED), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPEC , USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)t The site is in an existing vineyard with a auc lyptus windbreak on the adjacent property to the with Th. and +tones fn fhe nos h There are no known eultuze, hietorieal or scenic aspects to the e1 E Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No • WILL THIS PROJECT: • YES M x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? — x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.): x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations) x 5: Remove any existing trees? Flow many?___ , x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnishe above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the beat of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the bast of my knowladge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate ovaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Data Title ;7n�.v -�/ �''� •; RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO;SIISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7350 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAr NO. 7350) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH AND UTICA STREETS ■ • WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 735n, submitted by Rancho Land Company and consisting of 2 parcels, located at the southwest corner of 6Lh and Utica Streets, being a division of the East 1/2 of Lot 20 in Section 13, Township 1 South, Range 7 Nest, Map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands, recorded if. Book 4, Page 9; and WHEREA;, on -ebruary 10, 1982, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on Apra 14, 1982, the Planriin Commission held a duly advertised public. heario, for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE. THE RANCH: CUCA140NUA PANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings hava been made: 1 That the map is consistent with the proposed • General Plan. 2 Tnat the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3 That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4 That the proposed subdivision and impr &,ements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or love adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION Z That this project will not create significant advr +�.? envv r�tal impacts and a Negative C�claration is issued on April :4. 1982. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel flap No. 7350 is approved subject to—ht a con itions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA `ti r i v! , 0 Resolution No.'., Page 2 BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST. Secretary of e Planning Commission 1, JACK. LAN, Secretary of the Pla Cucamonga, do hereby certify that regularly Introduced, passed, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at Commission held on the 14th day o f to -wit AYES. COMMISSIONERS: NOES COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: ming Commission of the City of Rancho the foregoing Resolution was duly and adopted by the Planning Commission of a regular meeting of the Planning April, 1982, by the following vote- , . s sM�.2 . I DATE, April 14, 1982 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT TO Me..bers of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY Crrt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -04 - HARDER - The use of an existing square oot ng or a ante studio in the General Industrial category (Subarea 3), located at 9613 Arrow Route, Suite G. PROJECT AND DESCRIPTION The protect site is in the Cucamonga Business Park located on the outh- east corner of Arrow and Archibald (Exhibits "A" b 'B') The location is designated in the Industrial Specific Plan and General Plan as Gen- eral Industrial. Personal services such as the proposed use are allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use permit by the Planing Com- mission The dance studio will provide ballet and jazz lessons Monday through Friday from 3 p.m. to 9 p.m., and on Saturday from 9:30 a.m to 3 p.m. The applicant intends to direct all classes with the help of possibly one or two assistants. A typical class will have ten students with a maximum class size of 12 or 13 persons. Only one class will be conducted at a time lasting about 1 to 1 -1/2 hours. Five to ten minutes will be provided in between classes Restroaa facilities will be provided but will not include a shower roan or lockers Grade school children will be Instructed on weekdays from 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. The applicant states that these students are generally drop- ped off and picked up by adults. Parents wili only be allowed to watch the lessons approximately three times a year during designated visiting days Weekday evening classes will begin at 6 p.m. for teenagers and adults. The final class will end at 9 p.m. Ladies exercise classes are also planned from 8 to 10 a.m. on weekday mornings. Music will be played during all classes. A soundproof wall is to be constructed between the studio and the vacant suite to the east, but because the veterinary Clinic on the opposite side functions on week- ends only, no sound wall is proposed A complete list of all business in the dance studio building is given on exhibit 'D ". ANALYSIS The Zoning Ordinance classifies the proposed use as a special school and requires that one space be provided for each three students and one space for each instructor. Five parking spaces are allocated for the dance studio. ITEM E " ` r> April 14, 198: CUP 82 -04 WADER Based on the Zoning Ordinance rquirements, this amount of parking will allore a class size of 12 students with one instructor. The Cucamonga Business Park property manager stated that the -e are 37 stalls directly available to the studio after r.omil business hours if the park (8 a.m. -5 p.m.) As the Commission will recall, three churches were allowed to locate in the Cucamonga Business Park on a temporary basis, Exhibit "E" shows the location of parking used by i. :e churches on week- days after 6 p.m and on weekends No overlapping of the spaces bet- ween the uses occur. FACTS rOR FINDING The project is consistent with the General Plan, the Industrial Speci- fic Plan, and applicable zoning ordinance provisions. Given the limited class size and number of parking spaces available after S p.m , ample parking is available. Conflicts for 3:30 to 5:00 on weekdays could oc- cur on the occasions adults accmnprnv children to classes. However, this occurs a limited number of tim. hich does not seem to concern the Business Park owners Noise created by dance music has the potentia for disturbing adjacent business if uncontrolled. However, this can be mlti{atrd through noise • attenuation construction for adjacent interior walls Conditions of approval are proposed on the attached resolution to lessen any potential conflicts as stated above. CORRESPONDENCE A public hearing notice was advertises in the pDailr Report newspaper on April 2, 1982. Thirty -six publr hearing notices were sent to sur- rounding property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received tither for or against this project. RECOKENDAT 1011 It 1s recommended that the Planning Commission consider all Input and materials relative to this project A Resolution of Approval with Con- ditions is provided for your review and consideration Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez. City Planner RG:CJ jk Attachments: Exhibit A - Vicinity Map Exhibit C - Available Parking ' Exhibit B - Dance Studio Exhibit D - Business Survey Location Letter Exhibit E - Church Parking Demand from Applicant Resolution of Approval with Conditions 1 °s P• ZF____ —`s�*� I� in cs, rl 1 Il � NX)R, ii CITY or, MEM, 1-= RANCHO CUCAMONGA TTrLE, vtc.,Nr► it r,&e PLANNING DIVIMN EXHINT,A_SCALE, 14 SCALE, : " - E Illllllll ,llwlllluu lU— ...........` _ �wuwr� u -- ilullr-1lu� - TL .- _ II C lTTrrrfTl i �IIIIIIIII�IIUIIInuununlnwU _ uni _ min �- _ ffffr9ffTm mnmrrm n u InmmuuuuulllllllllllmwnulllIII n i e - 1 i CUC 4MONGA BUSINESS PARK 1' CITY OF RANCHO CUCArvlo \CA lrE�a� PLANNING DIVISIQN fIT(F.�C� t. :• March 24, 1982 Mr. Michael Vairin CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173, Re: 9613 Arrow, Suite G — Hallmark Dance Canter Dear Mr. Vairin: As the applicant for the above address I would like to submit the following information. The suite referred to above is approximately 1,620 square feet of office /warehouse space and our proposed use is to open a dance instruction center. We plan to provido primarily ballet and jazz lessons. Our proposed hours will be from approxLaately 3:00 in the afternoon to approximately 9:00 in the evening. Lessons for our younger scudentsj i.e., school age children will begin at the 3:30 pm hour and we have learned from a previous studio that the majority of these children are dropped off by their parents and pixed up after the lessons hewing a minimal impact on parking. Cur teenage and adult students will be scheduled from approximately 5:30 pm to 9:00 pm. This works out well wir'1 the other tenants because onr ::ours of emphasis will be generally after their closing hours. We are considering the possibility of having exercise classes in the early morning. We anticipate these would be limited to 10 persons and would last for one hour. This is still in the discussion stage at this time. The improvements required are basically simple, and consist of providing mirrors on the walls, ballet bars, and a special dance floor. We do not foresee any major tenant improvements required. .. . n n 1 .. City of R:mcho Cucamonga March 24, 1982 Page -2- We w_uh to be eocontible with our neighboring tenants and recognizo our naed to respect "et- usage. in a previous studio we had no problems with our neighbor= tnd will be happy to cooperate in whatever way is necessary. Thank you. Sincerely, e r 'e wtr�' Carol Harder Is 3 SITE LOCATION SHOWING PARKING AREAS AVAILABLE TO ITALLNARK DANCE CFNTI:R CUCAMONGA BUSINESS PARK __+ 37 NUMBER OF SPACES DIRECTLY AVAILARLF Tn IAL ARK DANCE CHTITER PARKING AVAILABLE TO HALLMARK DANCE CENTER C5e t CITY Or �mm- >^ RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tnuy &AtLpl� ' PLANNING DI\'M%i EXHIBIT: G SCALD K Y ■ .•a } TYPE OF USE AND HOURS OF OPERATION OF EACH ADJACENT OCCUPANT IN BUILDING 3 WHOSE PARKING COULD BE USED BY HALLMARK DANCE CENTER SUITE A East /West Associates - General Offices Mon - Fri 8:00 - 5:00pm SUITE B Accent on Basic Skills - Remedial Reading Assistance SUITE C Mon - Fri 12:00 - 8:00pm Sat 8:30 - 3:00pm SUITE D Western Temporary Service - Temporary Help Agency Mon - Fri 8:00 - 5:00pm SUITE E Vacant - Anticipated Use - General Office ' SUITE F Vacant - Anticipated Use - Office /Warehouse (Under biscussion with a medical services company with anticipated use Mon - Fri 8:30 - S:OOpm ✓SUITE C Proposed Suite for Hallmark Dance Center Anticipated hours to be: Mon - Fri 3:00 - 9:00 pm Sat 9 :30 - 3:00 pm SUITE H AAA Emergency Vet Clinic No weekdays Sat 8:00 thru Sun 6:00 pv SUITE J Leasing Office for Cucamonga Bus.ness Park Mon - Fri 8:00 - 5:00 pm SUITE K Wm. Lyon Company - General Office Mon - Fri 8 :00 - 5:00 pm SUITE L Development Dimensions - General Office Mon - Fri 8:00 - 5:00 pm SUITE M Superior Training Services - General Office Mon - Fri B:00 - Sz00 pm CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMO \'GA PLANNING DIVIMN R'E \6 Tnu..: ucSS vsz.rrt EYHIOD -1. _SCALFj*A „ • Cl W Mu,xt, \ �•A rt n� 3 tr•-�-I _*• CUCAMONGA BUSINESS PARK a GALA FELLOWSHIP . . ...... .. 92 b FOURSQUARE GOSPEL CHURCH.... ... 70 + C LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES, INC ...... 95 H7 TOTAL TOTAL PROVIDED WITHIN BUSINESS PARK -523 l` /✓ ^V1 x nsxrrH CITY OF rrE\I, RANCI -irJ CUCAMONGA mu, cHLw,+ m " PLANNING DiVI57oN EXHILM P- scALE• 9.x-5 : P'I r•ION NO. ® „" A RESOLUTIOV ' `. PeICHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION A, •N, I)NDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 02 -04 FOA ...•.a.. DANCE CENTER LOCATED AT 9613 ARROW ROUTE, !UITE G IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY .PFREAS, on the 26th -lay of March, 1982, a complete appti anon was filed •rot Harder for r rview of the above - described project and WHEREAS, n the 11th fay of April, 1982, the Rancho Cucam,nga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consiuer the above -des ribed project.. NOW, TREREFnRE, the lancho Curamonga Planning Commission •solved as follows: SECTION 1: That he following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, aad the pirposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; ant 2. That the propostd use, together with the conditions applicabla thereto, will not be detrimental to the injurt injurious proterties or Improvements nrthe y vicinity; and 3. That the propoeel use will comply with each of the applicable provi.togs of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That Conditional ese Permit No. 82 -04 is approved su ect to the following conditions: 1. If operation of the dance studio causes any adverse affects upon abutting businesses or properties, this item shall be breight before the Planning Commission for reconsideratimr and possible revoction of said permit 2. All City Codes arvi Ordinances shall be coeplied with c at all tines. 3. Noise attenuation for all interior walls shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Planner and the Building tfficial prior to final occupancy y h " S' E Resolution No. Page 2 4. Class sizes on weekdays frew 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. shall not exceed 12 students and one instructor. S. This Conditional Use Permit shall be null and void in tie event of an ownership change or a significant change in tt studio operation. In either case, a new Conditional Use Permit shall be obtained. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TMIIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: e ey King. Chairman ATTEST Secretary of e Planning Dora ss on • 1. JACK IA4. Secretary of the P1 am nning Coission of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regu,arly introduced, pas-ed, and adopted by the Planning Coamicsion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coamission hold on the 14th day of April. 1982, by the following vote - to -wit AYES: COMSIISSIONERS: NOES C"ISSIONERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: Rti - a OJr� 3 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE April 14, 1982 T0: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Ban Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN DESIGN Rela e - ve npment Review No. 80 -34 ,,,,((((��TTTTQQQQ V:Ah JC Lcm BACKGROUND. In accordrnce with Conditions of Approval, the Lesny Develop- ment has prepared landscape and construction plans for the Haven A,,enue median island, Exhibit "A ". This median will set the tone" for the entire length of Haven Avenuo. Because of the importance of this median as a community desig element, staff is seeking Planning Commission review and consideration of the proposed design. The existing "median" consists of Cypress trees and Pyracantha shrubs. A stamped concrete pattern resembiing alluvial granito stone is proposed for the median landscape. An actual sample will be available at the Planning Commission meeting The proposed landscaping plan, Exhibit "B ", Indicates 15 gallon size Canary Island Pine trees planted in an informal linear pattern. The trees will be underplanted with Indian Hawthorne shrubs ANALYSIS. Roadways serve as focal points for a community Euclid Avenue i nn i— aportant Coosanity Design element for the City of Upland. The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan contains policies for medians: "LIroscapmng should be scaled according to the size of the roadway and the imawrtance of the route. Mayor views from the roadway should be enhanced and emphasized by the landscaping " ITW F Haven planningeeommission Agend April 14. 1982 • Page 2 The parkway tree planting guidelines of the Geneldl Plan propose large nect the columnar evergreens tome also encourage plantingathe se:xmspecies- andpins street or sane Ho pattern. for the entire length nOfrac' ndationsras9tou n makes thetypeire or tree variety to be used in the median. gB concern beingoreD esentativeeofoorsrural hi story 9a and analysjzuofw75 street rtreas' suitable for his conducted a tree was reviewed in terms of the following criteria: I tow maintenance; 2 Koderate to fast growth rate; and 3 A tolerance for drought. heat, smog. and wind. Attached. as Exhibit 'C', is a list of trees meeting these criteria tha. would be aopropriate for median planting. • The City encourages the use of special landscaping treatments on Special soulevards landscaping as reaconservesiwateraandvenergy. The nc`roopoposedisSamped concrete has the following advantages over hand - placed alluvial rock: I Easter ad faster to install; 2 costs approximately one-third as mmich: and 3. Has a consistent, uniform appearance DESIGN REVIEW COMITTEE: The Design Review Coroittee has reviewed e o propose me an es gn and gave a favorable recommendation to the use of stamped concrete The Cormittee had tw specific reconmendatlons as to the use of Canary island Pine trees for Haven Avenue. OPTIONS. The following options are available to the Commission: I Approve the median design concept as presented 2. Require wdificdtion to the median design with regard to tree type if his option is chosen . and ttaffiwithodirecttoe direction provide esired the designer anges m Haven Avenue Median Design Planning Comaission Agenda April 14, 1982 Page 3 RECDMMEATIATIDN: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and consider all m material and input regarding this item and select one of the options presented herein. Respectfully submitted, I RIFK GGI!E2 City Planner RG:DC:tep Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Landscape and Construction Plan Exhibit "C" - Tree List • • ' a i i! ■ E A P.r+Kr1a /[or+�TnribM AAH �D CITY or. rmm, HP�I&N �G M�Oj,AI RAINCHO CUCANIONNGA ,nu,_, PLANNING DIVISIQV MOM SG1LFi �"' h, r EXHIBIT 'C" TREES SUITAILE FOR MEDIANS Deciduous or Coermn Evergreen Name D Italian Alder E Silver Dollar Gum E Desert Gum Semi - D Jacaranda D Crape Myrtle E Flaxleaf Paperbark E Pink Melaleuca E Cajeput Tree E Chinese Photinia E Canary Island Pine D London Plane Tree D Chinese Scholar Tree Botanical Name Alnus Cordato Eucalyptus Polyanthomms E Rudis Jacaranda Acutifolia Laggerstroemia Indica Melaleuca Linariifolia M. Hesophila M. Quinquenervia Photinia Serrulata Pinus Canarionsis Platanus Ace^folia Sophora Japonica 0 e it I