HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/05/19 - Agenda Packet,o4vf RANCHO CUC,IMUNGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA
Lion's Park Community Center
91b1 Base L ine Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
May 19, 1992 - 7:00 p.m.
1, r,,..L TO ORDER
a. Ro'.1 Call: Frost Schlosser _, Buquet
Dahl —, and MikeTs
2.
CONSEhl' CALMAR
1
4. EI*VTRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND OEVFI OPN -mN11 R I EN
82 -10 - R.C. INDUSTRIAL - A revision to approved
plans for Fnase IU Ranclio Cucamonga Business Center
to allow construction of a 205,000 square foot ware-
house distribution building on approximately 12 acres
of lard In the General Industrial /Raft Served cate-
gory - APN 299 - 261 -29, 30
10
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL NAP 7494 - MON
CORPORATION - A dtv s nn of 14.3 6 acres into par -
ce�tt Tn the Industrial Park area located on the
North side of Arrow Route between Red Oak aid White
Oak Streets - API' 208 - 351 -27.
3.
ADJOUR184,NT
3t
yt•
� „i,�.'�-
�M^".n:��CI°il'G �7t`iu. ��:'.
s. i�3V
.: �. _ AlY�i1•�.Ily
7,
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE May 12, 1982
TO Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: M1 Coleman, AssoeiaW Planner
SUBJECT: Et_M1_!RON24ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPML ;iT REVIEW. 82 -10 -
'fADUST - rev35 on to approve pans or Phase
)` auc o ucaianga Business Center to allow construction
of a on 3PProxaiiately a 2 acres wofe land e r
lntheGeneral Industrial/
Rail Served category - APN 299- 261 -29, 30
Related File: OR 81 -27
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The Applicant is requesting review and
a PprovdT of a 20 ,1100 square foot concrete tilt -up warehouse distri-
bution
replaces the The foot
completed pthe
Development and Design Review process and is now before the Planning
Commission to receive env;roraental clearance oily T`.e detailed Site
Plan and elevations will be reviewed end approved with Conditions by
the City Planner corti -gert u, , approval of the Negative Declaration.
ENY WOIENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study has been CemPletrd
by a pp cant ands attached for your review and consideration
Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found
no significant adverse Impacts on the environment as a •+esult of this
project.
RECaMERDATION: Based upon analysis and the initial Study, it appears
at-Fi t Lhe protect w111 not cause significant adverse Impacts upon the
environment. If the Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Negative
Declaration for the project would be in order
wOSPegtfuyly Submitted,
!2j
R CK
C ty
4p: A tai
listed on following page
w
ITEV A
MIS
C!TY OP kit, Z' ie
RANCHO CCCAIMO�,GA -
" t, PLlANN(, \G QX M�
•.i�, "..'.� DIVISI E \I IIISIT _ ,�.SG%LE.
El
ar
L
` c
covmt�_
eun,..xo e
nowrnwa'eeerrrna ~�•••
MOCAL TM
*AAWAMer "non
6W11.8 6CROWM
�gm TUC
� :"J � � � uj/ �rri��vti�l,�f�r "� • �;i*i� _ ►NYV+a wT rnca
. � I11!Iil ll{^j Y. QYVNOOW anaer4y0YY
pill I
`ra - - --
a eigQr •�' r �
I�
I
` !1 mncoY � I%ADNO A
c wr ma
Y � nYwa�rY YYIY�uI�
NURTH
CI"I'Y OF ITG\I,_ wiz
R:1� \CIIO CL'Cr1110.\'CA T,Tu,VC -_ _E.�c,�
PUNNING DIVISIOV CUIIUITs._._- PLSCALD
E/
C
I
evanlna a �
NII �In� 1111 P. 1111 III I11 V)1 QII I,Ip
1 k
t' I 'Itl i pnl'IN �'llll0lnnnnln p IIr- '1710
—B 074ElT —
w` �� J �lilD•
C �
b t
III
n
BYILOINO A
V
NORTH
0
Y�
CITY OF (-
/
RANCHO CI.CA,�'IO .NCr1 TITLE,
\. PLi\4vNl.�G DA'LIO\i Exillar_ LSc%LL.
„s
I ,-
e'
9
CITY OF
RANCHO CL'G\,NIO GA
PLANNING bi.- ISIO \`
1
Nmni
TIit1} :c �jZe(j�ntr C7 /phi '
E \I IIGIT �� SQ%LE,
{ r
1 � �• aj � a F
m o jjj > I j
d ��dr•
o �
t1
1 I Ijil �� •
I�
a
n I�
I
I
CITY OI rrE�t. �r ss2 rd
,kr RANCHO CUC-kNI0 \C ,r�, Tom,_ ,AT��
=•"a PLA. \ \t+ \C DIN,UgQ\ Est fnuT _ ice,
A 1 Y
F
. e CITY OF RhVCiO CUCAMO,.r
1 INITIAL STUDY C
PART I — PROJECT IAibRMATION SR'3Ef — To be completed applicant b
Environmental Assessment Review l'eez S87 00 by
For all projects requ!ring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted tc the Development
Review committee throagh the department. where the
project application is made. Upon recaipt of this
a
Pllic.stion, the Environmental Analysis a:taff will prepare
Part II Of the Initial Study, The De.elopment Review
COamittee will meet and tare acti011 nj later then ten
(10) days before the public meeting at whiuh time the
project is to be hoard. The CotcnLtt;la will make one of
three determ - nations: 1) The project will have no significant
filed. 2) The
environmental tawillaha a aN ignificaat environmental imrpa to
and ai Envirormntal Impact Report will td Prepared, or 3) An
additional information report sho ild he supplied b� the 3) An ant
giving further infutsration concerning the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Ranc4o Cic +•!•••noa Ru•,lness Cen er` Phao 7R
APPLICAAT -S NAME, ADDRESS, TELFPRONE: R r r
Orionam 6 Partners ,i r t i r
_, 1301 IMVO Street Suit
NAME, ADDRESS, VMEPEONE OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED
CONCERNI`IG THIS PROJECT:
•1: nee C en�fli nj' f M
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS At7D
_IUF•f sixth and yll1 Hen Av ASSESSOR PARCEL h'J,)
`
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECLSSirRY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL. STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND TIU AGENCY ISSUI.VG SUCI! t'nnn PERMITSi
1 -1
.i
AV1 AGZ OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF A.Ny:
ExlStine to lldlnac I h..im...__ ._.. rPr> °''cat Area: 74 acres.
PROJECT D�SCRIpTION
DESCRIBE THE ENVIR0�7}fiN('AL RETTZVU OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFOPMATION ON TorOGRAPHy. PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL. HIS'MRICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESChIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS);
Presently the undevclooed acreaan is ..t..e... _. __ ..
Is the prolec:, part of a larger pio ect,
of cumulat ve actions, which although individually smalls
may as a whole have significant environmental am
Phise 18 t• nart of 'he 74 acre master olanned develoomentof t
Ra�rhn Cucamonna Business Center; Hl�ich as a ,thole shoo d not have
519n1fiWat env,rnnmo f
� Il
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
�— 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
_ x 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
"- x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, Sire, water.
sewage, etc.)?
x 4. Crcatc changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many?
Y— 6. create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flam:�. bleu or explosives?
Explanation of any YES anmaers above:
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the con- Aruction of
residential units, complete the form an the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby cortif_v that the statements furnishe
' above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, ctatements, and
information presented are true and correct to the beat of
my knowleege and belief. I further understand that
additional inforation may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can j;-) mad bl• tke Day.elcpsent
Review Committee. � R.CN 'Ft-tG1PAtIY t7
0
%3
u
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM014GA
ST-AFF REPORT
DATE: May 12, 1982
TO: Members of the P1!nning Commission
FROM Lloyd B Nubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Kral], Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Pa72'Ap 7493 ith - Daon Corp. -
division o acres nto pi T s win the Industrial
Park area located on the North side of Arrow Route between
Red Oak and Mhite Oak Streets - APH 208- 351 -27
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION.
This subdivision consists of 14.36 acres of land and is being divided into
4 lots for future entertainment fa:ilities and recreational use.- Developmer,
plans have not yet been submitted, however, a conceptual site plan is
attached for your review. Individial prujects will receive rurther review
by the Commission
The site is located in the Daon Corp project within Sub Area 7 of the
Industrial Specific Plan Surreuniing property is zoned for Commercial/
to Industrial use with existing office conwominiums to the west, vacant land
to the north ano east, and an existing industrial building to the south.
ANALYSIS:
Streets surrounding this project have been corstructed a., a iart or the Daon
Corp project Sidewalk, street lights and street trees not yet irstatled
are being required as a condition of this Parcel Map. Access on O:row Route
will be limited to two (2) driveways with rec•p•ocal access easwn n:s required
for both access and parking. Grading plans will be submitted at time of
development of each parcel
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial
Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the
Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a fielJ Investi-
gation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field Investiga-
tion. Staff found no significant adverse impact; on the environment as a
_ result of the proposec subdiv' <tct
FACTS OF FINDINGS:
This project is consistent with the Get ral Plan and 1s found to have no
h,y adverse affects on public safety or environment.
�a continued...
ITGIF"
`�.�nT§ tY -ht,•a�wq�,, :r ., _ s.
; a,Y �."'vi+T:x?!R' :SP'iI U�;'.,' 1O.6.i..i1�• f 47,
4.. Planning Commission Staff Report,,(
» Part 1 Map 7494 ,•:r
May 12, 1982
Paqe 2
r;
CORRESPONBENC_:
Notices of public hearing hate been -ent to surrounding property owners and
a Notice of Public Hearing has been placed 'n the Daly Report newspaper.
RECOMNi.NDATICN:
it is recommended that tha Planning Cor:aission. Consider all elements of the
protect If, after said considerations, the Commission can Mcaaai,d condil ons
of approval, then adoption Of the attached Resolution would be appruoriate.
Respectfully submitted,
LBHK:bc °
Attachments
.�''.�.:YFf:�1r... 1•i?��h��4 '�;fw'i..'r -•
19
w
CITY of RA\CI-lo CCa;,1\IU \GA
J \
YV- �.J. �•• �L
yfit % ENCI�IEERI \C Dl1lS10N
VICINITY ,%mp N
race
t M•
x
—
9
t r
t
1 •
1
•ur
My
ss
o
J_�
,�
-�- --
- -_ -1~
PROJECT
19
SITE
CITY of RA\CI-lo CCa;,1\IU \GA
J \
YV- �.J. �•• �L
yfit % ENCI�IEERI \C Dl1lS10N
VICINITY ,%mp N
race
e R iii; -9
t Rl,�
�Xg
Pt
I ; .14: j o
I�
r
cg
1 ,
L7 I
fei
4f TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP 7494
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
t(40 1 iYt01Yg10N 01 g11t(L NQ C O/ 11NC!\ v1f 110 t)tl,1i /ll1
/ Y1I IIICONOIO w COOL 01.OI Alco. Yoi, At C . IT a, t, IhClYiwL
H TNCllva 6/ TNC CWNTt II[CONO[11 Of }N[ CWYTT O! LNt[Nh..OMO
C01WIT, 111T[ 0/ C1 \11011X11
l0 NY \.'At • /*1.111! 0013 11f N ..Is
OX11*Or Cwr • CL NC !1012
d� CVRVIC O/fI
rNl�w
ft f, Ln11!1.
4�iu� y �X W.1O
4WIYY4
It
1
f 1.1•• Iy I. .- L..hn
1 ` -
t.1�.... ; 'r1 / ` `,`•ter' >A. . n e 77 r I n,
1 1 �^.I �Jwr rYV - I •Y I
I 1
L—'_ '� 1 .fit •'
•
.1 A4Y 'art 1.3 I
VY Ar.ul I
I 1' \I /..r• IN.. /N< � �I /111111 I��JII41 � 1 f
1
I: 1
'r• I YI• I^4�h. Yw 41R1
IMM M IIrN
4+.n 4.11 Ly y Iw.y
Y�r 4 IIY
h �NY,Y• iizzr
1 V1v +1" rY111r 4s... _�
.,�1X1
X.IXr
r•.xisvY '.....r r ..1. • Is� P
1 �.� 4,11 ^., ..... .r. 1 •••ippp����i]]]JJJ � ... 4 f
IM N
' 1� r+Jw•
1 : y;GL2• ••�•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA
INITIAL STUDY (40
PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET — To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fees $87.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the D:velopmant
Review Cormsittee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the En.rironmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Stud). The Development Review
Committee will meet end tare action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be brard. The Committee will make one of
thre, determinaticrsr: 1) The project will have no significant
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact
and an Environmental lupact Retort will be prepared, or 3) An
additio.si information report •.hould be supplied by the applicant
giving further information concerning the pronesed protect.
PROJECT TITLE: Tentati-,e Parcel Map 7494
APPLICANT'S MWE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Oman Corporation
1pnD parkrenter Drive Sul 400. Costa Mesa CA 926 ?6
shun- 718/641 -6666
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PRO; ECT: L D King, Inc _517 North Euclid Ave ,
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL N).)
_Parcel R. Parcel Mao 1„25
LIST OTHER PERMITS S.TCESSARY F:4TM LOCAL, REGIOXAL, STATE AID
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AG.NCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
nnne
to
• T -1
i
J
4.
6
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Subdivision of Parcel 8, Parcel Nap 6725
intn S narrnl<_ for the puronsp cf future sal s.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF MY: Acreac• la. "6
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONlMNTA!. SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING IUMPI -MTION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,
AHMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
IF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AIM THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
This protect is in the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park The area is
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
Of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
This nrn,ect is part of the Rancho Lucamaina Business Park orniect
1-s
1�
WILL THIS ppp�CT:
YES M
1L 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sowagn, etc.)!
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 5
X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flasrnablea or explosives?
E1-planation of any L answers above:
INP"TANT, If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnish.
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand tint
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Davalopecnt
Review Committee.
Date A..", /j 01-� Signature '/ 1
Title _. r'!tn•%i)•.[: �,ky
Xo.0 ".c f ,. V-.
• ` RESIDENTIA ?. CONSTRUC'ION
Tha following information should be provided -o tLe City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the
school district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Nana of Developer and Tentative Tract No.:
Spac! " c Lucation of Project:_
PH ?SD I PILISE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOT, AL
1. Number o! single
• famil•. units:
2. N=.! :er of multiple
£am_ly units:
Dr_z proposed to
beg-,-. cc ^struction:
4. Lar_iest date of
oc anc- : --
Hodil 9
and ! of Tentative
S. Dedrer. -s Price Rance
e
i
s
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7494 (TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO
7494) LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE
BETHEEII RED OAK AND WHITE OAK STREETS
Tentative Parcel Map
7aon Corporations and consisting of4parcr�r
ls e located sonm the tnorth
side of Arrow Route, between Red Oak and White Oak Streets, being a
division of Parcel 8 of Parcel Map 6725, as recorded in Book 57, pages
4 -7 of Parcel Naps in San Bernardino County; and
WHEPEAS in April 14, 1982, a foraal application was submitted
requestin7 review of the above - described teatotive map; and
advertised public hearing for the2abcve- describedOmaptsslon held a duly
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAYONrA PLANNING COHMISSLON
RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I That the following findings have been made:
1 That the nap is consistent with the proposed General
Plan
2 That the improveme•it of the propose subdivision is
consistent with the proposed Genera Plan.
9 That the site is physically suitable for the proposed
development.
4 That the proNsed subdivisior and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage, public
health Problems or have adverse affects on abutting
property
SECTIOR 2. That
adverse envTomenfal lmoacts i project
ana a sn t
llegative Declarationisissued on
May 12. 1982
subject to t0e10ondttions That ofTentative
CityParcel
Engineeir's HReport4pertaininged
thereto
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THiS 12TH DAY OF NAY, 1982
PLANNIRG CO- MISSION OF THE CI-Y OF RAIICHO CUCANbIIGA
i�
AN
Resolution Ito
vE Page 2
BY:
e "eY K ng, a,tsun
A TEST.
Secretary of e ann ng gmn s5 on
1. JACK LAN. Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the P1Laning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cuca'nnga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commfssfon held on the 12th day of May, 1982, by the following vote -to-
wit:
AYES: COMISSIOAERS:
NOES C"ISSIONERS:
AFSEIIT: COMMISSIONERS:
r
v
t
1
Y
t•
r
�
X%% + 4,
CITY OF RANCHO CLT:AIJONGA
CI-Y ENGINEER'S REPORT •
FILED BY Daon Corporation
TENTATIVE HAP NO. 7494
LOCATION: North side of Arrow Route, between Red
DATE FILED: 4.14/82
Oak and White Oak
IIOMBER OF LOTS: 4
LEGAL CESCP.IPTION: Parcel 8 of P.M. 6725 as recorded
RECEIPT NMER:
in Book 67. Pages 4 -7 of Parcel Maps San Bernardino
FEE: $273.00
ourty
ZONE: M -2
+ y r r r: f y r f f•: r y a f w f f f w f f y f a
w a a a+ y w f- e r f r f r a w
TENTATIVE MP PREPARED 9Y._ L. D. King
GROSS ACREAGE:_ 14 36
AODRES'_. 517 N. Euclid Avenue
MINIf31M LOT PPEA• -
Ontario, California 91762
MINIIRRi LOT FRONTAGE:
RECORD O:CIER;S) ADDRESS PHONE P
( —P±on Corp. 3200 Park Center Drive 641 -6666 •
_Suite Iona
Costa Mora. California 92626
REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER
Dedications
1 Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and ell necessa
easer*nts as show, on the tentative map
2 Dedication by final map of the "ollg.:ing missing rfg'ts -of -way on the followino
streets:
additional feet on
additional feet on additional feet cn
orner P/L radius required on
Other
1 3 Tgnts of ve—hlcu.ar access WWI, ue 11MM as fell ans
4 tree[ vacation requ red for:
5 Master Plan of Strcets revision respire' u r
6 The fnllouin; per reter intersections require rea ignr:ent as o o:rs - S
t-
RCE 20
TENTATM MAP NO 7494
Page 2
• Imnrovrre- nts (Bonding is required Prior to 13 Recording for )r
® Building perm t fora parce s i
Construct full street improvements (including curb 8-id gutter, A.C. paversnt,
sidewalk, ona drive dpiroach per lot, parkway trees and st -eet 11 :hts) on all
interior streets.
E. Construct the following missinQ im)rovements on the followirg streets:
•including landscaoinm and
OTHER
9 Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative
lrtiteito acnc T IC Pruuvide all utility services Engineer including san,tary sewers, water,
electric Power, gasA telechoneand .t*mL.Mev,y,{pi.
are to be underground ron•�,.it All utilities
0 X il. Develope- -tall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of
X 12 InstalleapD opriateostreetxnamensignslandutrafficscontrolesigns with loca-
tions and types approved by the City Engineer
13 Developer is to proiide all construction plans for drainage and street im-
provements Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer
X 14 Sanitary sewer and Miter systems ,hall be designed to Cucamonga County Hater
District standardsi A letter of acceptance is required
X IS Street light locators, as required, are to be approved by the Southern
California Edison C¢apaay and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative
poles wits undermround servim
16 The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an
A C overlay._
11 Tfe I o ow ng spe1 11 1 1::,:: ns 1 ons, e , cu -de -sac ra us, street sect on
widths) are not approved:
18 TFe ro cuing ex st ng streets are su stan ird:
They will reouire-
Aperoyals and Fees
19 This subdivision shall be subject b conditions of approval from CALTRANS/
San Dernardlno County Flood Control District
X 20. Approvals have not be.•n secured from all utilities and other Interested agen-
cies involved Apprc..I of the final map will be subject to any requiremnts
that may be received from them.
RCE 20
TENTATIVE I1AP no. _.4 Page 3
C% 21 Pemft% from other agencies will be required as follows: S
A. Cattrans, for:
B City:
_
% C. County Dust Datemert stn ct:
D. D.1 S. Trenching Pe^ it if any trevc es are over eep.
i E. Cucawnga County Water oistrict: F Other: Sewer and Water
flan Control
_ 27 If only a portion of this Hap is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro-
vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets.
23 The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, death or area
and should be corrected on the final map:
24 Al corner lots shall have a corner radius at the r g t -o -way ne n accord-
_ 25
ance
peshall be recordeduprior9tosthedfirst phase subdivision to prevent
the ereatien of an unrecognized parcel located
26 he boun any o t e entat ve ap needs car cat on as o ats:
T_ 27 Ile orders a be s own to center ne of ex st ng per meter streets, yr
title explanation required
Parcel Nap llaiver
28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient
to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel MapZertifT-c-Ate, according to
requirements of the State Nap Act and local ordinances
Flo` od Control (Bondinq is required prior to 0 Recording for
13 Building perm t oil-
29 Proposed subdivision falls within thr;e areas indicted as subject to fload-
ing under the I(ationa! Flood Insurance Program.
subject to the provisions of th -t program and Ord This subdivision will be
mince Ho 24
30 A drainage channel and /or f,000 protection wall along the entire north pro -
pzrty line may bL, required ro divert sheet runoff to streets
Such fle:r.nay be required to go under �rdewalks through culverts
— 31 r .rater surface is above top of curb, 30` walls shall be required at the
the
32 Culverts required ato be constructedeacrossb streets sat following locations:
33 Oivad sea t n rn
yd Ingrc suW�es n e renu rrcxi co assess impact ur nu•eas ed
rwrof,
RCE 20
J
TENTATIVE MAP NO. ma
Page 4
Miscellaneous C
X 35 Dust abatement 11111 be wade a condition of issuance of the grading Pern't for
this project.
x 36 Noise impact on this project will be mitigated In accordance with the Planning
Division report on subject property.
31 This property is not within the prsent City Boundary and will require
annexation
38. A.1 information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re-
quired:_
x 39
40.
X 41
x 42
x 43
44
L 45
46
"I
`.J
=" RCE 20
5;r
Jf?A�
tion or damage to offsite Property �shall ubenProvided * for tasirequireddrmenla-
A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow-
ing reasons A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division
prior to grading will be furnished to the Fngineerinq Division
The filing of the tentative map or approve. of same does lot guarantee that
Bearer creatment capacity will be available at the tic* building permits are
requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Hater
District will be asked to certify the availa)ility of capacity. Permits will
not ba issued unless said certification is received in writing.
66436(C)(ii ofethesSUbdivisionhllapeAct ,ithat Section the
property will nct unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise
of any public .ntity or public utility right- of -we- or easement and the signrr
ture of any such public entity or public utility or., be aaitted from the finaj%.
map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina-
tion within the specified time limits of said Section
At the time of Final Flap sutmlttal, the following shall he suramltted: Traverse
calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used es reference and/
or Showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced
Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street I4ultlpI. lots
fronting on a single street shall ese common drive approaches at lot tires
Applicable portions of the conditions for Parcel Map 6206 shall also apply
to this project.
Beciorocal access and parking easements ensuring access to all parcels o%er
pn vdte drives, roads, or parking areas and blanket drainage easements across
all parcels shall be recorded cor.current with recordation of the Parcel Map.
CITY OF RANCHO COCNXRIGA
LLOYD O HUDBS
CITY E.NG19EER
L
BY:
t
r/
QiY of
RANCHO cL; A,,%IC ,n
Cm COIJNIQL
AGENDA
Lion's Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
May 19. 1982 - 7:30 p.m.
All Items submitted icr the Clay Council Agenda Must be In rrlting. the deadline
for submitting these Items is 5,00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior tv the meting. She
City Clark's Ofticv receives all such Stems.
1 CALL TO ORDER.
A Pledge of Allegiance to Flag.
- B. Roll Call: Cahl.- BuGuet_, Frost—, Schlosser , and Mikels_
C. Approval of Minutes: none submitted.
2 ANNOUNC'MENTS.
a Presentation of Proclamation to Arthur H. Bridge former councilman.
D Presentation of Proclamation for Older Americans Month.
c Administering Oath of Office to new Planning Conaissioner, Dennis Stout.
d. Saturday, May 22, 8:00 a.m. - ALTA LOMA HIGH SCHOOL FiaST ANNUAL SK RUN.
e Thursday. Nay 27, 7 :00 p.m. - ADVISORY COMMISSION AEETOG - Liun's Park
Comnuni,.y Center, 9161 Base Line Road.
f Tuesday, June 8, 7:00 p.m - ETIHANOA SPECIFIC PLAY MEETING - Etiwanda
J�..Intermediate School, 6925 Etlwanda Avenue.
y;
a
City Council Agenda -2-
May 19, 1982
's
3. CONSFNT CALENDAR.
a. Approval of Warrants, register Ho. 82 -5 -19 for
1
$1,085,284.42.
—
b Forward Claim by Alvin Cohen and Alba Cohen to
3
city attorney for handling.
C. Forward Claim by Evelyn Maxwell and Spery Maxwell
5
for Michael Maxwell to the city attorney for
handling.
d. Forward Claim by Lory Guevara to the city attorney
8
for handling.
e. Forward Claim by Ronald E. Higgs to the city attorney
IS
for handling
f. Forwelyd Claim by Patricia Farzley to the city
19
attorney for handling.
9 Alcoholic Beverage License by Ellen and Frank Nicas-
22
tro and Jacqueline Nicastro for on -sale beer and
wine - eating place, Nlcastro's Italian Crulsine,
• 9626 Base Line Road.
h. Request to advertise for bids for Base Line recun-
24
struction from Carnelian to west city limits.
1 Acceptance of Parcel Map 5937 - Perez: located
26
at the ; outhwest corner of Victoria and East
Avenues.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -83
Y8
A CESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
RANCHO U O . 1
APPROVIN ARCELMAPNO. 6937 (TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 6937)
Request to exterd improvement agreement from In.o —
Homes for Trcct 10491 located
29
at the southwest
corner of Victoria and Ramona Streets.
—'
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -84 _
31
A dESOLUTION OF R'E CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
i
APPROVING THE EXTENSION OF THE IMPROVEMENT
AEREEMENT FOR TRA;' 1,1491.
.�
Qw+
,
�.p
t
a
0
0
City Council Agenda
-3-
k. Acceptance of Tract Map 12176 -Gaon Corp : located
between Red Oak and Utica, north of Civic Center
Drive.
RESOLUTION N0. 82 -35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP 12176
May '9, 1982
31
37
I. Approval of a Resolution designating the Mayor 38
as the city representativn relative to the Community '-
Development Block Grant P•-ogra,
RESOLUTION NO. 82-as
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE
CIIV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORN,4,
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ACT AS THE 1FFICIAL
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY IN ALL MATTERS
AND DUTIES BEFORE THE UNIIEO STATED DEPART-
MENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVFLOPMENT RE-
GARDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM.
39
m. Recommend awarding bid for Ura m Forestry Grant to 40
A -1 Nursery as the low bidder of $6,375 minus 2%
paid in $5 days for 300 white alder trees - 15 gailN,n
size
n Request authorization to seek bids for the const -uc- 48
Lion of minor drainage facilities at various loca-
tions within the city Engineer's estimate: $40,000
4 PUBLIC HEARINGS.
A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
02_ TT 91 - MAYER A change of zone ron
R- ising a family res entlal) to R- 3 /P.O. (multi-
ple family residential /planned development) in con-
junction with the development of 44 patio homes and
322 townhouse units on a 35 acre parcel located on
the south side of Arrow, between Turner and Center
Avenues - APN 209 - 091 -05, 06, 07
ORDINANCE NO. 175 (second reading) 51
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RE-
ZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL ?;UMBER 209 - 091 -05,
06, 07 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW,
BETWEEN TURNER A14D CENTER AVENUES FROM
R -i T6 R- 3 /P.0.
City Council Agenda -4- May 19, 1982
is
B PUBLIC HEARING TO RECONSIDER APPEAL OF TFNTATIVE 52 _
TRACT N0. 92 AND P.D. 81 -08 FOR 5 -85 '.ORES OFOF
LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH S VI' Or I HLW D AVEN E.
EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE.
ORDINANCE NO. 165 (second reading) S3
AN ORDINANCE OF INE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOAGA, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 241 -
252 -32 FROM R- 1- 10,000 TO R- 3 /P.D. FOR
5 85 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND, EAST OF ARCHIBALD
C ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 9 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE S4
DISTRICT NO. I FOR TRACTS NOS. 11696. 10762, AND
0,-
RESOI UTI:N NO 82 -87 60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITI COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA,
ORDERinS THE .lORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXA-
TION 110. 9 i0 LANDSCAPE #%ATNTEIUUICE DISTRICT
NO 1 FOR TRACTS Ft:, 11696 10762, AND
10277 -1.
D. RECOMMEND ),TION FROM THE d.STORIC FREL!9VATI2N CON- 67
MISSION TO ESIGKATE THE LEDIG HOME AS H HISTORIC
LA.NDNAP.K 6
ORDIKANCE NO 176 (first read g) 68 >!
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CwnCaL OF THE
Z�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOGHIZL'IG THE LEDIG ROME AS A SIGNIFICANT
HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS
A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK.
E RECOMMENDATION FROM THE HISTORIC PRE:ERVATION COM- 69
MISSION TO DESIGNATE THE NORP HOME EDGEMONT
AN H STORIC LANDMARK.
ORDINANCE NO. 177 (first reading) 69
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, '
Sy ® RECOGNIZING THE THORPE HONE (EDGEMONT) AS
A SIGNIFIC.dIT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THEREFORE DESIGUA- a
TING IT AS A QTY HISTORIC LANDMARK. :"
0
City Council Agenda -5- may 19. 1982
F RECOMMENDATION FROM THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION CON -
NISS109 OESIdN TC H DEMENS TO STOY HE r
A PO[NT F HISTORi INTEPEST. a
ORDINANCE NO. 178 (first reading) 70 /SL
Ali ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA,
RECOGNIZING THE DEMENS /TOLSTOY NOME AS
A SIG4IFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THEREFORE DESIGNA-
TING IT AS A CITY POINT OF HISTORIC
INTEREST
G. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REIMBURSEMENTS. Item con- 71
t nued from the Apr il'21, 19az meeting. it is
recommended that the item be continued to the
June 16, 1982 city council meeting.
H. APPEAL OF PLANNING COK41SSIOIN DECISION FOR PRE-
)ACT REr, RT FO
THE DEVELOPMENT OF TENTATIVE 'i RACT !33 �—
development of a tota p Anna res aentTal develop -
mrnt of 185 single family deta, wa units and 14.6
acre park on 95.5 acres of land in the R- 1- 70,000
zone located on Hermosa Avenue, north of Hillside.
5 CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
A AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED NI III ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 114
DISTRICT ma
2- . It s recoende t e
t t Council
appro— velminary Engineer's report, authorize
advertisement for constmction and bond bids, and
set the Public Hearing date of July 21. 1982 on
Assessment District 82 -1.
Assessment District 82 -1 (formerly 79 -1) will con
struct major street and storm d•ain facilities in
the industrial area South of Arrow Route between
the Uevore freeway and Deer Creek.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -88 122
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA,
DESIGNATING PERSONS TO PCRFORM VARIOUS
DUTIES FOP. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS
AND RESCINDING PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.
v.
0
City Council Agenda -6- May 19, 1982
RESOLUTION NO 82 -89 123
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING THE GENERAL MATURE
AND LOCATION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS OF
IMPROVEMENT AND SNOWING THE PROPOSED
BOUNDARIES OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO
BE ASSESSED FOR SAID IMPROVEMENT
RESOLUTION NO 82 -90 125
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA,
COVERING PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION Alin
ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT ON
SAID IMPROVEMENT
RESOLUTION N0. 8 ? -91 127
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA,
APFROVING A REPORT UNDER THE 'SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND
MAJORITY PROJECT ACT OF 1931,• AND FIXING
1. DATE. OF HEARING THEREON.
RESOLUTION NO 82 -92 129
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA.
DECLARING INTENTION TO OROLR THE COII-
STRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TO-
GETHER WITH APPURTENANCES IN A PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF THE "MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT
OF 1913:' OECLAR'NG THE WORT TO BE Jt MORE
THAN LOCAL OR ORDINANCE BENEFIT: DESCRIBING
THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS
AND EXPENSES THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF BONDS.
:1
1y5,
l�ti=�
1
City Council Agenda -7. May 19. 1982
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -93 135
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.
PASSING ')h THE REPORT OF THE Ef ilhEER,
GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING
A TIME ANO PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
RESOLUTION NO 82 -94 13R
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIf 07 THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA,
REFERENCH!G PREVAILING WAGE SCALE AND
DIRECTING CALL FOR CO"STRUCTION BIDS
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -95 140
A RESCLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANQNC•A, CALIFORNIA,
SETTING TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
• ON ADOPTION Oe RESOLUTIOr OF NECESSITY TO
ORDER ACQUISI110A BY Er :l".ENi DOMAIN PRO -
CELb1NGS.
B SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING GATES FOR REVENUE SHARING 142
�i report y arrl� y Fnpey.
C EIIWANDA SPECIrIC PLAN UPORTE. An oral report to be 143
Presented by Tim Beed e, Sen or Planner.
6 CITY ATTORREY'S REPORTS
7 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS.
A APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OB PROPOSITION 9. 145
RESOLUTION NO 82 -96 146
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA,
SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 9.
8. ADJODUdNNEttI°. tt.oN
_ y
i
r�
�T "I
'Z
7 � mY;'1J
f • r • • • • r r r r1 r I n n Il I I.
s
opov °cm °wrno= co°OOOw °o° °i °`- °° w°oc°°
OG +CAi01Y«MM.ruNONMMa
O'- AOf1 P NA
F H
N N
P O
n
I
......OrNM
Oi`NNVaCN-Ory F°NaFNONOON VPppOrpNOONNWMp:Np K
MIJ�M },yj.V .............. \L.ipONOa00p�000a<NPOOA nO _
iIgNM1-npm ±Nanap Nnawwm° C MoE<n.•V A nY.IVV.fVpO
NV. a -nO -r +NO /uaN ON-NP n -P.,
O
i
z
0
as
y Yi I
GU
U Cr
y_
•
6
2
NNNNwNMiwNNVnIWWM1NNVN.1 W.•NNN W.ry..IyNNW.ryryNry.NyNNw.MV NNFNNNNNNNNNNNMIr,IN
fW .irOpp(.Wfyiiii444ypp4ppppmmpp VOOPpmpm[
V4pVl pp Vp9apmCOmpp[mm4ppmpppppmOappp
't � ^a1tV0^OMV n.Irr VrW rru•wnwwMNWPVPPP VPIPPP°VPPPOp
3Y COaVOOtgpO(90VOO OO�r.-rr..rr Pr = -rV OP= V 01-r = -P^P :P VrV �POPPVP
��
rrrr'I. V�NMYwY, NilMraV�aW.,,, V1. Wy, a, NaVVVJ,. Y�, V1 [JWY.aW.,Y,NnN1V,IVa.YV.NayIVw
VV,I,N..V V.
1
V N F } a � N VN NO f �
a uiu L
�•
_ 2
=
u P
y,..f
I'
<J WM3 } fVW( iZiN�. wiz
a u2N
i iL; �V��<e(Y V JV i6 iVW <f }� wJ
4 iF\.Z (<.<i_We..J 1-YYi 101YF,.(LV «L
<uNJ�W20
f�
{ wJr S u N �Y.V i= O = -aiw tlN
�.+Oiis T.S NOrr..J VN a VJYf FV V�Y hpp(
� iara <W h ♦as_pu az:L�
�a�a - .ni -�W-. ,:o osi..s Nr} uTJ = ,r',�i uwxN y sJW
u sar. <p>iWfiN�>rr.r. ca<a.wuu u <au wa..f< -uJ >fW �w�ne o.....
fr(iJ. <JVVWI _WJyV[J -rj f2+rM(Iw6 y Ns1tl V<Li JW(-2.1 2 a oL '
�WIW `V 4,a{'N' r ^oY- fviMil4 \aarNW \wE VLV VWW 2 -(J f•l� 1 WYV Y6,V
Z Y aitZO .r .p Y, •`a Le< WaYW <LWaW Ny a J 2 \(rr s }Y
`y{ {y= {s�praNNNNrJ-.22uaN:UVCq Y Ct♦ •. ap
V q2J >W iu�u(W
yntrra•pOWV GV
Y Ka :.Yf2ZJ[>(LJ< Yya =i <Y[ \SY p- V1Vahiw -Y -Z VNI
t - ..N�JVM (.1 <rWr•.(L VN)iOfi
>
«iy}}Yyni��,
)
f < :a.a(,a -a +.a( 'r• a2•ti <S(n(wVY�.NaUYJJV > Wff ZSZJ�C LnrZWyNah0.Z<
YL• <nJiai, <rrWW.IfJ Vaa >aa T.> -W.. CO p22
zwWUZ »vN[.- NNV[.NSnauNNE» 'eocaaraanu3°z2Nr--
,� p aamu�',JUJy uyp nsN`.W >orytlz
'.
+.(..•p fNOSrraoao-.u.i,.wa . nruhucwnur`>NOnrew°oaN NuopoopoNaoovNONNOwone- pPprY..o
'Y< n�. YUNrM4wwPr� .NYw- .� >nr..r.- wunuo.rY. wow,. J. yr�.4NP..um..J.Y.-- u.w..nr.v..ro
} -- +�rN..Y.....•Y.nnY.r -w enNUrr. Jauwn( PP4n.. w. WN.. 4ap ......nvowaaroPP- Nr...nr(na
I ^ > -NY VY41`H. Vraw .Yy1•Nwwnys}IIVV�+-
L ' rMMryNN.V,.F NNN.wrlrlr,.rNYM ..........
�
f
W PIMOVCO0000�,
t�'Ff pPV. M• INppppr. NMNVFi yrNYprA{ MVVJ+ NI, IVYFppp ..NNrNVwpPV�VINNOFOPp�rVNVI`4Tp
mWp6mVMti_PVPPVPC000CUpOaC -.rr
C; a i NP�Nauonoaoppa.oa�oo ocr µNnµ F
1ayY[" -p Z
�
tVOVOCOOCaCCCVO= ^Vt� -'p VCVNMN =N = = ^' µ,NN�~t ��N�N� <Ma «Nn.wYNN.JW.NNw
qVO�`� -•-`�� V f.,nNnCn
�'T
���f � ^ -NNY^M .V_NN.`IVWti
N
•
V
DOOOr- a0 ^090DNNNdOdYY00+O1VN0000000NOON IOr•UO >OOriNOMNO01rr000N N
DOMMOOr DO ^OOPa+.........NMp ^DO-
....
1.
......pNONNONPM1
......I�r-
MMarW) dNDCNON +OO`ONI.00PPPMOONOi.a�r. NNNOfMIV Y�J'O ^ +Mn�•N^ONL ♦
P- Y•�NNII.OII ^NN.�•CP^ NP Mf
N�
x
V<NV rOOD V =rM1ON
N NO^t N rD •I.N NN wI eNNI.rM �V Nal NN F N
N O •r rYi OIl nr rW N
O
r
p�
J
-
N N
\ O
a
\
4
N
N
i
z
E
Y
n
W
•=
i<
i4-Y
yY
S tJJ
J
-
•. Y
6
{
i
3
-
-
'
a�
w Y N. NrNVNNNI .MI•..MNNNNNNNNIM.M1NN........•.. o .. ........... _
Yi.,i.Y >iiY� >Y...
•. •-_
yOVaaJ�Vivo pa PP- p.` a= POVPaP.V•PV V`
XC
^vaaO= ^vl��^
............
\o..n�nNNY•.wwwn.:•:vw
.. wYY.. v: w.n.\•YhrYYw•..N..vw•MM:Y\ni�`i i l•+r.....•N
i
n >✓y M> Jx � N�" 1:{ -Y YiV =NUV r-J > V O V > W
L
.•` O w W1 Y E NrY�J.9 Jr aF <OZ ^ N u =
VM^J1V n C V`^ 6 W2� J l <iF •• JVY
f
N=
u i WY S� f ^.-Y Y >VNI.OW V ES J N>
If
V
r
J Y N 6 V u� ! \VV = /NN V6 O G ^O QVY+V f YY
...f •2 v piar� s> .rD ao^+•a.YYa: ai m-J xisN N J
V
J : WWYOE 7iUYrNDW r.YTVLZ Lit •.i�ir. ` CL 2 V r<NN
f VTLI OYNLNWNU. :V6rN•i i > O JVN \l• WYb•22nJNN J
i 4
U
'J
V M.a�. <a6 <VJLr• -v7iJ U<r•N- •ufyR<i < W r «vyr < 4V:t
'N�1<IJ \iWJn<iZ40 WyW a V 8VC/ f \\WVLM{.��n6 V�'^�Y�NV is
•.J`Z LVit -JU 2 fNDN rUV
-
D
V
LYLLL 011- fY4`N1Q.N C ^y JL• OVY
W. V4tr N nyNVU'ify <Y:uV NV< <Yi \uEG�i+ VJr O ^I ^^
y 2
1V U�. Ny CVY^ <VV.pp <O Zir VdUau <r <f Vilr <JSNIZVVV�O
V.'ia �}jV�yN•.9 V�raaal0 >•.L6 <f��Y J
�� �llr�if
2 W
YVn,. 6LZW Yy��YJJ
Yr•i L•Y <iirr Li >.4IVM.r^WV<v. •u <�_V LrrJ20<YJ ^�LJNDU2IZ
JLf
•
i >
MIR r \^ f JL<OVVrN>rAEW ET ^ZJ0 _ JiYfrJWNr••JJiYUWr
tiYp.. <VV^��fiu^�16ii{f1r1v.+^.N i{V„ >L( 0'J V < ^t+uu�J�O^uY
�
i
Iw 1
YJJrJL1LLLZOyLiYiittii {iZRiiia\ H.{•iiNNNNN^nJYlil1ZZ < »VY
dV�V7+.N)IO�;W�MPDY'IIO.r MrCJI .O ^rOMVJONdaNM••DDDn000 }WrN.PD
•
V W
> J
P ^- V \rvf./•....r•r >VV4! ^ -/J ^vV iYJMNOV NnV VPYO ^I•VVVV^
V 61+ ^^�WPN.W O•.•+•..O.��YY V WrYYr�a1YV"YYwYwY i W�wWYMnnVW.•IV�NN V V V PO
K•I.r.TI•^r'.`rY ` r. YWVVVPYV VVVVVM>
:l
. V
` ' i
POD '.!•MrMP�M \.MINPOVVNMINMaaD ^N
�
l
�
1.
•ryr1.WOrNNIM'•YWMMNO..<
dIItIIII <JNMMNNM.IO -0O Orvvr Y<O< 1.v^�. +OKfOf OaYOC IPP
�
.per<
MW.MNIMNN.wMVYMnNM.YM•.YM.. IvNrv.MNM+W WJ.•WM'• NMMw \NV •
VIA NNNMf.1tYNN/MMINMMMM'NVr•M
1 I__ S♦
O y
�CNM ^NNE yNM.w1.�YY= ^MMMfNy
^ ^N
el
n
u
1
2
3
4
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12'
13
14
16
16
17
1s
19
211
22
23
24
26
26
27
28
JAMES E, iIUMMEL
An " Ar LAw
A f3o,m�"
340 iOVfM rARmA1 3rn
3 GM= D= 3033
ro 0 CRUM"M ZUG
M4$ 613.A q1u 33L »u ,331 »3AUA
Au=wy fs, P1A4.iiff
III THE CITY COUNCIL
(:tea
m oxmn
6Y, l
CITY OF RANCH,) CUCAMONGA
AOMIAISTRATION
MAY 001M
AY FM
71SAID1u,1111A t AS
FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
In the Matter of the Claim of )
ALVIN COHEN, ALMA COHEN, ) CLAIMS FOR INJURIES
(Gov't Coda 5910)
Claimants, )
V6. )
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
)
Reeeo:ldents. )
TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON3A, CITY CLERK, _ITY HALL,
9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Californi•,
a. Claimants, ALVIN COHEN and ALBA COHEN reside at
1915 Eloise Nay, Upland, California 91786.
b. Any and all notices and /or communications regarding
this claim are to be directed to the claimants' attorney, JAMES
E. HJMMEL, P. O. Box 3053, Pomonr, California 91769.
c On or about January 28, 1982 at or about the hour of
7:00 p.m. claimant ALVIN COHEN, was driving in a Westbound direc
on 19th Street (Highway 3a) west of Sapphire Avenue in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga or the CAty �f Upland at or near a flood
control district that is adjacent t•. said highway. Pespondont,
-1-
1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, so negligently maintained, controlled,
2 and improperly marked said street, among other things, so as I
3 to cause claimant ALVIN COHEN'S vehicle to 90 out of control
4 and cause great injury to his person and property
6 d. Claimant was injured abouthisface, nead, and entire
6 body
7 e. The names of the _ublic employees involved in the
6 1 said act are presently unknown to the claimant.
0 f. Claimant, ALDA COHEN, hereby claims loss of consortium
10 of said claimant, ALVIN COHEN in the cum of $250,000.00;
11 q. Claimant, ALVIN COHEN, has been damaged in the followin
12 amounts:
13 1. Damages for medical and fut•ire medical treatment;
14 2. Damages for loss of earninqs and future loss of
16 earnings as yet to be determined;
16 3. For general damages in the sum of $1,000,000 00
17
18 Dated: May 3, 19x2
19
•a? 5 /�/it�stru/
/ JAMES E. HUPHAEL
2.1 Attorney for Claimants
22
23
24
25
26
27
s 28
-2-
A'
8
a
1
W �
-1 1ivasoa & ardulton
2 I AtIOma7a at Lew
' El Central Rawl Plaza
I 12612 Central Avenue
i7 PO Boa 336
Calna Ca. 91710
4 �I Tolapl=e: (714) 627.0168
3 Attorneys for Claimants
Gil
E ?ELYN MAXWE:.L and
3?-RY RAXWELL, as
9 I' personal xepresentative
p o_ all the heirs of
10 I MICHAEL MAXWELL,
I� deceased,
31 tj Claimants,
12
j vs.
13
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
3.14, I COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and
• 151 DOES 1 through 50, inclusive.
aCaIIi�a
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA&KA
ADMINISTRATION
)AAY ) C 1982
AY P4
^)819)Np'rn)2)2(3(4(SIfi
1 Ca'•vj ..('�.-LlS Ir
)
I
PROPOSED CLAIM
) FOR WRONGFUL DEATH
16
17 ' TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAI COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN01 and
I
18 STATE OF CALIFORNIA:
W
;I You are hereby notified that the above claimants whose
20
address is 8696 Orarge AVOneU, Alta Loma, California, claims
i
2? 9 damages from you for the wroigful death of MCHAEL MAXWELL:
Date: 1/26/82 and 1/27/82
23 Place: 1 mile northwest of Sapphire and Almond Screet
(Cucamonga Canyon area, known as San Sevaine Rd.)
24
The total amount of said claim so far as our present
zs
it ability to state is $150,000.00.
26 ;1
The basis of this claim is that the said deceased was,
t� Il while adjacent to the above roadway, sthnding thereat when the
Pit-- 26
h
N
d
1� earth gave way underneath him and he feel some 600 feet. There -
2d after San Bernardino County Search and Rescue found MICHAEL
J Ma'N
AELL alive and to transport him attempted to remove him by
o stretcher. The stretcher broke and the deceased again fell. He
5� later died.
6 The basis thus is a dangerous condition, failure to
7• naintain and /qr failure to warn of a dangerous condition.
JDated • ..i � i /.�
9:
10 FUDSON L JOHNSTON
1
12 JOSEPH E. JOHNSTON
Attorney for Claimants.
13'
14 .0.
151
' State of California, Secretary of State;
16' Department of Transportation;
Department of Potostry;
i7 County of San Bernardino, County Clerk;
9 City of Rancho Cucamonga
18�
i
19;
20
2i �
i I
E2 Q
23�
2Gq
25
261
27;
21 -2-
F
d'
14
CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES
AGAINST THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DECLARATION OF PRESENTATION OF CLAIM BY MAIL
I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to the claim
affixes to this declaiatian. : am a citizen of the United State and
employed in San Bernardino County, California. My business address is
12612 Central Avenue, Ontario, California.
I presented the affixed claim by depositing the original thereof
in the United State Mail in Chino, California, on May 7, 1982, at the
United States Mail in Chino, California, in a seiled envelope, with
postage thereon fully pre -paid, with the names and addresses shown
on the envelope being as follows:
State cf California State of California State of California
Secretary of State Dept of Transportation Ranger, Dept. of Forestry
1230 "J" Street 1230 "J" Street 3800 Sierra Way
Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, C4 95814 San Bernardino, CA 92405
Clerk of the 3oard of Supervisors Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga
County of San Bernardino 9320 Baseline Road
175 •:est Fiitn Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
.San 3ernardino, CA 92415
• Said mailing was made by certified, return receipt requested.
At :ho time of the deposit there was regular delivery by the United
States Mail between the place of deposit and the place of address.
Sianod at Chino, California, this 7th day of May, 1982.
I derlaro under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is
true and correct.
7
luau. WMG,t
KAREN WRIGHT
IQ
4
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
TO PERSON OR PROPERTY
omuata raa MA
I RESERVE FOR ITLINC STAMP
CLAIM Na
n
tNSTRUCTIOV3
L Claims for death. Injury to or to Dmptrty most be filed
prrwn pasooal not,
later than too days after the oecumua tOov. Cade Sec oils) .
Iri OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
L Claims for daaute, to real pro pertl mmt he IDed not later than I year aft" We
oreursnte. tGOv. Code Sec 9119)
AOMINISTRn TfON
1 Read enure storm twton filing.
t See Date g for duCmm upon which to Iaata plac, of aceidenl
s. Thu W 3
1.1n7 0 3 1982
claim farm must signed on pace at uAtam
S. Attach Separate sh"ta. If necesn to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEEP.
7. Claim must he filed with City cter�t: (Gov Code sea 915a)
6
TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
I !
Name of Cla naant I
Ago of Claknant (H sutural person)
(state w Telephone
us,* adores, to wmen you des1ln nonce,, or commuu"tmu to be rent regarding this claim:
,75'67 W/ Gold 'DA' �CCCAydA.Kq/ CAG/f 9/730
How did DAMAGE nr I21J11HY occur? Give full particulam
4V,sv/LC q Gi�iN.tJRS'�7t -1' C�- .rISI' sit! to'AS
fl e--4,27- - a:/r!i °G'G ANd Z- IdAlAtf �O 4,11& ✓GJ
hen dud DAMAGE or INJURY occur- Give full panuvtsrx. class, time of day:
F�/s 07, /,Fez l�r.>ittr. G:36 .aH.
Where did DAMAGE or INJURY ateurt Descnhe fully. and locate on diagram on reverse side of Urfa sheel, when appropriate. gret
street names and address usd measurements from landmarks:
G 10.l13;' 401q,0, t!oroMVA/,rY le -�r�°t
9161 /3ASEG /,✓E, [e ell r70n!!A
What yariicular ACT or OMISSION do you ci.un "used the Injury or damage? Give names of City employees outing the iNLry o:
damage. It known
77j47- ^47Z/d'f &1,0V[.a NC7 H11UE Cce,C,"?,e,54
/,C Sr12T /%4,0 77.'8
CA2i Afle.—°G. 10zsd 7hE /r11 RarC7PK t /rou[A a,4d� /di?A �j tJ �j {T',r�?lr
What DAMAGE or INJURIIS do yw claim resulted? Give fwl extent of .ajurtes or damages cialmed:
�JGaI F)r7u•✓ O>< T7-/c e�NE6 C/ifp. .SirZ d/hr i../.4 /12AC.c
�cr2 .� [ ✓G�Ct' — !U /G..[ rZs9tE 7b f /AG'c yr.! CP:_.�./YTJO.✓.
wnss n.utau.S uo you amm on account C. tun uem of injury or dcmago as ut data of presentation of this claim. Cja rot oasis a
computation:
�,oJ,dg[ctAA.eF /7S.yo 3, Cif= '/J,vd
rV
o,A
a, EA7E/tLt]X ✓TO- �9ft+E.v.' u?//3.OA. �..�. r..rx Jrvr17,wffpr[[e -?O7.00
L!d!R XrpY N 7rvC.dN,d r.vEL
hro ESTIMATED AMOUNT " far m knuayt you cm,, on uIrunt of each ncm of proJIMIlve Injury or damage, givtng Cam o
M7 01"e-rICATIotJ
SEE PACE 2 (O%Mt) '1 THIS CLAIM MUST DE SIGNED ON REVERSE SID!
Imurar•n payment re"hed. It any and names of tm,sa s, Company:
caEjn,Rs MF PI -OyeE mss-
Expenditures made on accli at accident or Injury. (Dote — Itom) (Amount) fe DR. SA1,asa lC e.1.J a /ez 46.00 `A—ZA c-VP
s0- oo A41- Ad 3
ajePNA.•.ma,,e. A.4rc.rac /s3 /ra Ls ay to _
--.3
Name and address of Witnesa ai Voclots and hospitals: SAN IIa3 YD aJ.a /`
'DR a b SSA1,1T.4NIezzo 2. iWIF -IN AiMi L1VJX 1MC 3. Iy MN• Hot P.TAL
123u a /ARkcw • H(..Y 149 H S Za AVE g9rt SnN B61Tnlntza,�a R]
Upt/aNP ,f AL,F Qlisb •ew L+PL,tr+P, CALIF f /7^ UPt.AAJ, CALIF 9['186
• �• RGTD CAREFULLY
For accident all �\ Band try Js plat an following ndIAj= names of street. mcludini Nord, East. Sm.th, and West; Indicate pun of
I distanrn to arts' "[nets
It City Vehicle was horoh'ed, deft to by letter "A- focal[** of Cit vehldo when ,ou first sa - It. end by "D" location of Yourself
"IM and as Vehicle ofyou tint saw by veluclaelocation at Clt&v MebaasXme of actldeal by "A -1" and Notion of yourself or your
No:n It diarrams below do not fit the cilunlaq attach bent* a p "per distress signed s-, claimant
l
FOR OTHER ACCIDEMIS
SIDEWALK
I L
CUR
IF
FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS
-1 L4.
7//\77/- . ie•. Data
nlairhip to Ctaunan}
-�`,� ,�� Ft'J.Lc2t/etaa/ (Fi�7jtc.p.) E,evesT GUG ✓H/a'A S -,3 wt„
NOTE, Presentation of a false claim is a falony (Cal. Pon. Code Sec. 72).
T
amitS I4/ST DE PILED AI CITY CLEFk (COV CODE SEC. DISa)
0
RNIFFIN AMBULANCE INC
�
149 N TNIRO AVE
UPLAND CA 91786
(714)946 -6657
LORE GUEVARA
8567 WILLOW
RANCHO CUCAMCHGAsCA
C.0 ERNEST GUEVARA
91730
= 1YrCfirrr. W.rNY..M rrt N Yr
-4mi
CUSTOMER NO 8023649
PHONE NO.
9892096
PATIENT
GUEVARA,LORT
PHYSICIAN
CREAGAN
REQUESTED BY
OFD
INVOICE
BASE RATE
4.0 5.30 MILEAGE
1 30.00 EMERGENCY /NCN —SCNEO
1 50.00 PARAMEDIC RESPCNSE
TO 4VOI SERVICI.. IIIARGES, ACCOU4T MUST Of PAID WITHIN 30 DAYS.
NJURT WIT@ POSSIBLE FRACTURE
TAX I.D. 93- 2051097
75.00
20.40
30.00
50.00
r( A I
8175.40
u u„nunY
nu r.•.0
r rrw rwo IIN IFFIH AMBULANCE INC
t49 N THIRD AVE
Ir UPL4MC CA 9TT86
/l'
■
SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
abs yN 89RNCEIDINO ROAD. UIPLARO. CALIFORNIA 91780
•
6U.RANTOR NAU[ IMtRANCC faAM[ DATE PAGE
• uJ..1 E I• \[]7 SL •tl ] C Y Ir5 PL`d1 J2/a5 1
ISO7 tall.• INITIAL
14 :U ANC[ NO EMPLOYER
SCV • »d./
5- AL j
PAT.EV• PATIENT W w•f.r. a+cuD At ••.N w.wJ 1. LNN1p.Ot J.•I1.•.•OM•N
:U�VI 1. L. 1 • .x.c411 - -• _
ADMITTED► G..f•URGED►
a[crsTEA[c►, / ,/ mA.AR1a •+ ►,84- 44 -t >7.
[C[•K
{(R/ •' I OESCRiPTWN
I I
Pv5 '•O`. >T<l Ri0[ESSIWA[
AMD'JNl [c[s
TOTAL
AMOUNT
aP,l[[0•un
cc0[ .:.
• +nuN .,.T
EST AT THE Rli[ W 1[MP[PCENI t1p l PER AMNV 9 W IRG[ASLE ON THE PATENT~ POIIfgN OF
ESINAIED .J^J
MCA iN[OAILWS[RWC OR 0ISGNAPGE *HEN PAIM[NT IS NOT MADC IV AT_CORDANC[ WV °H
IR15un[,.[[
IL INT M/P LP 1Y
w>�•
1
1
5a.Z.)
Si.UL
J"
IT. 00,
TLL 11E SRLEO AT A LMEA DAl[ M TW WYE ANY C= M;
RMIq THIS STATEMENT. PLEASE CALL 11141 p 2211 i�aeUh • • n •.• •ter ` _•• • '
PATIENTNOW
U7,[.;a. yy LasT -7WT LP ANL.
rut,44
7 .101
r
UAL • I _ ,1 y I.F? CU7V SIUi
7357
> :.ov
1 >.il
7i.JU
±•
1 Jll 'A° 1NL A•'LUbT I
1a. I
Cr' r4
.T' '.[ •.
1' IL t1rJL LILLLC YCl
.: 4.
J V ,4P
I•CL
� 'hr 1 f ��• LUT �..
nl
+t•C
nl' • J l
VS
1`L •'AY T.lF 'TL'•[
i
.T JLL' 7Lw.
[sTRAAr[D DII[ Taou
a15V•AND[ PFtI[NT I
•
14, TOTALS , 7•.•.! J I .,7.AJ 1 :4..t; T
I 2.I.Cv I
L.OQ
I n...... a�1�rsu sn ARtanw:.rvR Ay Ab m
+•>r MD
•T1
I ' I
140
SERVICES r'.,..w A N.w ws... A� ^-.» u.. c+ a L7Dw Gh1w,[ IRS No 95.1110910
• +nuN .,.T
EST AT THE Rli[ W 1[MP[PCENI t1p l PER AMNV 9 W IRG[ASLE ON THE PATENT~ POIIfgN OF
ESINAIED .J^J
MCA iN[OAILWS[RWC OR 0ISGNAPGE *HEN PAIM[NT IS NOT MADC IV AT_CORDANC[ WV °H
IR15un[,.[[
143.OQ;
L AGP[!V!M Ry THE PATIENT WITH TH[ •IOSPffAL
1
1
'
5 CREDITS PAT IN THE OILLINO WEIC[ AT OIE TIM OP PATRNT Wit .IItrvt N(ryT•R. S1ATt.
M[N16 L.Z. wu;= N s [llx
WE [ROM
I
IT. 00,
TLL 11E SRLEO AT A LMEA DAl[ M TW WYE ANY C= M;
RMIq THIS STATEMENT. PLEASE CALL 11141 p 2211 i�aeUh • • n •.• •ter ` _•• • '
PATIENTNOW
M
r
I
r
- mw PDua .w ti....a.w.we.e.lAV
tM.'.tl h6ar.lp/4O Nw.se. sw. tt)LY.N Aif VPE11 R111iIR, fi TM9��
.p wnlO.a/,.v.au.G mr.rt. rylrr. Odrrpi MtM WlN 7Mr)tJtf
•s. v+.• u w errenr..aw.a LIS. D ID NOM IA S 05o03P�ATIENTS
PAID NOM s
w STATE MU CF ACP11NT
D"C� PLEASE
acac -Tr c&, °..vas?• slaw 2/•9!92 1
nr�s[ wnrte cDRAtcrIDN�eDVe r Nua -
DRADCPF11pgWNQI!)WBNCpVlLT 1MM M'OO.I�SWMMB.rN.B M.a Yvwbtir'dv....p��
� r �
GUEVARAo EAVE UPLAND CRTNOPAEDIC °EO 5R7UP
E567 VILLOV OR F 1237 EAST ARROW HIGHWAY
CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 R UPLAND, G1 0178E
PA
J L J
Itiuo-.i .cwF.nahi ro _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Z44C CHECK PAYMENT, 'NAN< YOU I 1C SA6.0'
LCRY 1 2018_ I 1 0 J. D. SALTAI.ICLLO. N.D. 836..
'C 82 OFC INT S7IeF I 0200 S.6.C:
C 8a I I ASP MAJOR JT 2061 $<5.0�1
20 8 1 I MISC SUPPLIES /CAST PATEAIALS 9907 53.00
2C 8 I I KNEE X-RAY 1 VCEV 7352 $32.00
LORY 2146 1 1 C J. D. SANTANIELLO. K.D. 836.
21182 I 1 BRIEF EXAM 90041 $27.00
LORY 2288 1 I IYSURANCE PLAN 92999 Ph.t 1153.01
I I I 1
I 1 1 I
I I 1 i
I I I I
I I 1 1
I I I I
I I I I
IWW V: hJt 9 hw:i D./
e
/�• F
••w•+y..rlwOU4
•..grV.NtltavRytOw.
H1.t ✓Y/WrIR•lR rpliic./Ut 1Mp
rM1HrWIlYMMt
M.. •.• -
-�•=
,...u..-
SNOW AMDUNT
n
None' �r-
......•.Nrn - -
PAR' In At S
PATIENTS
�.
ft
•ar ow.w 6tw/ e. w,MUwYr /nM. DrHOG,gmuro,rnrwm.
PATIENTCOPS
ATE 4LNi OF ACCOUiiT
�
/Wh
{
c•..
PLEASC T—
SHOW ON
•`DA1lQL Huueln �7
• VNN,pp. ae n rr
�P _
• . 'W :lw• %lIM .t RYA
SMr,eYSDlP.rIMA✓ty�tr 114I�bV/YO.. A1t\AI.Ay. tlwt7p
T
__
F i• +• EF: l:c:. H: -stl
_
m
n,- .2,wlu w.N. wsnihl e., aR auilren• Irt3w eRlrcus S.l�uel -1 .• -•_�•
E?t. ?I
S27.V
(.r•t D! ♦ ^r••Ti TMChr •• � Lc0.5:
,•r.c:.:E c.Y. *, -cc .I . S-T. P;
I I ,
f+.a,
. ..- ryJrlwf StalVl
n
- :.P=!r: r n.: • !earl I W DAYS
ft
•ar ow.w 6tw/ e. w,MUwYr /nM. DrHOG,gmuro,rnrwm.
n,- .2,wlu w.N. wsnihl e., aR auilren• Irt3w eRlrcus S.l�uel -1 .• -•_�•
E?t. ?I
S27.V
(.r•t D! ♦ ^r••Ti TMChr •• � Lc0.5:
,•r.c:.:E c.Y. *, -cc .I . S-T. P;
I I ,
I
Mw iftr IS
�I1ilr� � i
Io-A. DaAO, A 4 �w-
er.eeohatirwA.A9�fD1•y ;
n
- :.P=!r: r n.: • !earl I W DAYS
•ar ow.w 6tw/ e. w,MUwYr /nM. DrHOG,gmuro,rnrwm.
PATIENTCOPS
I
Mw iftr IS
�I1ilr� � i
Io-A. DaAO, A 4 �w-
er.eeohatirwA.A9�fD1•y ;
SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
as* BAN son"11D1Y0 "DAD. 10► 1110r CAiI►OlM1A 011416
WAMNfEIR NAME
,CUeVArAa E7rdt E
(561 i.ILLUN UM
4 PATIENT
,oUcYANAa WflY H
1 ' ADAemD► _ o15GMRGWI,
�REGISIfREGY34 j2� /f� Ww +IPi►
PIiL•RANCE NAPE
SCARS GRP INS PLAN
PISURANLf NO
CATE PACE
04/26 1
INITIAL
re 20 PT i
EMPLDTER
SEAQS CF
IAn[N• NO y, NNI.N r_OUP Ar •up ••rulr ro uww•ONOCwwnroyt..
,4507131 TO msva Prep« Cr L ntwn m4
Iron• IS Y
D NON 'turn P anlWtt PMaTA uss antSto
w
pCMed and "I'll 41m01 " rf
s
Wr
DESGRIPipN
IIyL
NDSPITAL
MGl[SSrWAL
MTAL
EsItu TED
m FOM,
Uzi��
Uzi OAR
CODE
•r<
AMOMNT
lIE1
AMOUNT
INSL►uAICE
PATIENT
I
JA, 3p.•UU8
PAYHEM PETIENN SS`
Cg ;3t-
"IterAl2
VC5
L
XPY AIITHRUGRAN RNEE735f.
13D.UG
42. S1; i7O.SJ
U4p,laz
I �
5DiT
L
7.RY VIJ401Crl AP.TN
AT3t0
63.00 63.U0
LCI:.E
PAY THE AA(rLSIT .f
iUE F
CA PATIE'Tl
NUR.
•
1
WE MAY! BItIEO Yt101
GPCrP
INSCRAICE
ajj+J
fifEY HAYC Not PlIj
VIT
qp 613 DAYS
I r
F�LA;n
PAY tHL aTGIAL
AHCUIT
ME# N'H.
i
I �
I
I
L
I
i
I
I it
.
I .L
I
i
I '
�/
I
I I
1 i i
L I
r �
� I
I ;
I
I
Y •
I I
I • i
I I
1
I I
I
RAnENT 45e17:: TOTALS
NIEYDER 33.CV I IvS.SC I 238.50 I
173.15 I
O.61
r.�P.x. or...., oil" bw San NRone Communrry Ibsplal
•CIAN9 SERVICES .+..e . y..a wo L •rsa+w
ik
I
I T 3. I6
ICTµ
A•.syr a rr.A.•r A•p.r .r.rv•r. Y tray w1ald CaAiT IRS A, 13-1103919
AaIOIIIIT O•J[
p N c INTEREST AT TEN ..AV OI TEN PEP -EM ILTI PER ANNDY IS CIAROEA9LP ON nd PAIIENTJAT IpRMN CP
ESTAIATLD
AM AGCO{PIT]O pAIS FROM I,- ..TEO' SERVU'.EC.1 D15CE mVnVEN D NOTMADIINACCOROANGE NiiH IIN34RANCE
TH fNANGAL ADREf PENT ET 1 -4'4 1INT to N TN[ HOSPITAL
1
�
113P .S
ROES .NO CREDITS 14GT N l.". •lALNO VICE AT THE iwL OE PATNAT ML •tG[M NONIr.i St.'s
O[ Fill EE ERf LD AT A LATp1 GAYS V ICU HAVE ANT OIIES• Nlxn Mx Tr4XO AILIPIM wa NLN IPATENt
OtK IR04
-t
\ _ CONCfPHIMp TNta ETATEYENT . I'LEASE CALL 17141 NYralt pL[Ir pRWMI!a.-n!s Nanotto A:
0
Mr. Ronald R. afagi
6118 Kirkwood Avenue
Alta Loma, CA 91/01
(714) 987 -3884
April 8, 1982
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Road
Alta Loma, CA 91701
To Whom It May Concern:
On the evening of March 21, 1982, Wile parking my car in the 7100
block of Amethyst, I drove across a scorn drain grating in the street
which has a piece of grating missii ;. My right front tire fell
through the grating and vas damaged beyond repair.
eIn my opinion, the city is negligent In allowing a defective atom
drain to exist in city streets, and iA responsible for reimbursing
me for the expense I Incurred for a nn tire.
Planes find enclosed v spry of the rece2ot for a new tire, and a
picture of the offendl., atom drain.
Thank you,
1
1lkAonald B. Nijgs
RFN /lh
3
t
APR ; Co M2
�r
`•'
Cliy Oi RANCH. CJCAYOOGd
18GR1fiR18G O:r:SA I }
3
I 1701 Lambert Rnd
L Hebn. CA 90031
1.Y
213691-?2!i7 • 714870,6140
"WHOLESALE TIRE DISTRIBUTOR"
�ro (C rr a 5 "w
L //R Ill Al[Line)b
A!=Zt / rim A CA
INvola No. 02— 05965
1-
PAYMENTt
ru
nlrr
ouun,rr
.�
.mocw
ncw: oew�ICe
u.a�
Daae,�.s
w
.n- n L
I
Le
r
7
%`. 4
ofz
A LATE PAYMENT CHARGE OF 1 %% PER MONTH (18% PER ANNUM) VRLL 0E
CHARGED TO ALL PAST DUE ACCOUNTS. BUYER SHALL PAY ALL COST AND
EXPENSES, INCLUDING ATTORNCrS FEES AND ALL OTHER ATTENDED AN
CATION COSTS INCURRED BY SELL IN COLLECTING ANY AMOUNT DUE.
THE ABOVE MERCHANDISE RECEP/M IN GOOD ORDER:
S
IY: X_. /yiV'�
T'
SUB -TOTAL
F.E.T
SALES TAX
LABOR d./
TOTAL
Z
1I
/il
I `n
� IF
n
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Jrt lL Briap lm D. DODeb •
C a Jwn C Fenl Dlkhd A. PJnaae
D 2
Im
mar
April 23, 1982
Fred Klein
San Bernardino County Flood Control
825 East Third Street
San Bernardino, California 92415
Dear Mr Klein:
Attached find claim regarding apparent defective inlet grate located
on the west side of Amethyst, north of Southern Pacific Railroad
crossing It is the City's understanding that this structure is a
San Bernardino County Flood Control facility. Therefore, the attached
claim is being forwarde4 to the County for consideration and further •
processing
Sincerely,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Monte Prescher
Public Works Engineer
Enc
MP be
CC: Ronald Higgs
Y
POST OFFICF. BOX 807 • BANCIIOCIICA31n \OA,C.II.IFOIINIA91700 • (7tJ)7ae -�F iI
r- PARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND FLOOD CONTROL
go t Ttdrd Stmt • San Elam"-. CA 92416 • (71413s3-1836
•
.•
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIMO
umROMNENTAL
fusuc wous AGENCY
JOIN R. SHONE. Oeaata,
May 3. 1982
File: 1- 409 /1 -R E C s 9 a#j 2 D
City of Rancho Cucamonga MAY ' D 1982
Post Lef J.,e Boa 80CalifornL 91710
Rancho Cucadnga, CIIt GS F: ACHO CUCAMONGI
ENGRIIte10G 09iS1.0N
Attention: Hr. Monte Preacher
Re: Zone 1, LUCamnga Stozn Drain
Gentlemen:
We received your letter of April 23, 1982, aing with the claim of Ht. Ronald
Higgs. for replacement of a tire which was da,aged due to the failure of a atom
drain grating.
the inlet gracln6 vas part of the Flood Control
It was your assertion that
District's facilities.
After reviewing the records pertalninf to the Cucamn8e Storm Drain, St te concrete storm dralntwhichf ishin elxist.utceefor roadway °drainage a e Purpose$ - 31h1e
drain vas never a part of the District's facilities.
Cucarongs Ste= Drain. portion
At the tim of tons, ruction 01camn6a Storrs Drains Of
a junction et ructurs was constructed which conveyed the atom were" from the
36 -inch concrete drain into Cucg=O11
If you have any questions regarding this matter, phase contact Mr )'red Klein.
Field Engineering Division, at (Area Code 714) 383 -1836.
FK:cm
cc: pate Sherburne
Him Ihrig
Bob Rignlght
Very truly yours,
JOHN R. SHONE
DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR FOR PUB,.IC L`ORKS
By ✓ �1��""' y
Ruben V. Montag, Chief
Field Engineering Division
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES RESERVE FOR PILING STAMP
TO PERSON OR PROPERTY CLADtNo.
-
aoctatt Wins me
r1ISTRUCTIONS
• 1. Claims for strolls. Wool, to Penn Or to Personal Or7arty mtul bt filed not
osier Than 190 days after the nK9nm[s lGOV. Cade bee Will2)
CBlus for damages to real pCap2ry moat W fUe not later than 1 7Car atlas the
Oceunnct. (Cot Code See. 9113)
2. Read entire claim befaro BRnt.
4 See Wa•• 2 for diagram upon which to locale plan of accident
D, 11W ciahn term must be signed On page 2 at billions.
Q Attach aqurate tneela. U nttvsarrfy,� W tlrt full dttalLL SIGN EACH SMEET
y. C:aun mtu' be file with City Clear Coda Ser. 9ldal
TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA'4014GA
Name at pabnant
1{ome Ad, , %. O(Cl% , I
a`. 1 1
.i % \
How did D.
which you desua notkes a cammumaatlont TO be sent retarding
CITY or p a 6 Y ` "
9D� A11S?RAi1r)N QHQA
MAY 1 21982
AM 8191n181C'1112131g1 516
Ate of Claimant (U ssu ural person)
.1 Wins tr n .rr.V, t ?Iljr
ACE or INJURY occur) Give full pxUctdafi
yt btu l-- �1,...rr... �C•r._ �. niJ y_t_, 1�1y /Llti :�
t t iSu r A,
�. r \� m.\ P y•
Rban end VAhIAUE or LlJular oceurr utve auu Parucuura, umc w
When did DA>1AGE or INJURY Occur! Describe fully, and locate on &ALeam on nsvene aide W this sheet where appropriate, give
street names and add" and measurements from t Indonesia. 1 ( 1
1"•,., .. ,. ♦ '. \. At"t fx. \" k`e� 11y zxt
..t. L" I, `I U.`CLCCl
What partleuur ACT or 0IRSSION do YOU claim Caused the htlury or dion go? Give names of City employee, causing the Injury or
dtmsee. le t•o-n- Q
r.Cr CI —•Wilt ,.`y Vr:
7. J
1111ut DA:.IAr.E or iNJLIIIIS do you claim resulted- Most full salons of Injuries or damages claimed.
it A
1
Acct A7dUC::T Ju yuu a aim on ocoeunt of each item of nJury or damlco as of dale of prurm tun of this claim. Ching balls of
Rmputatlon {1 1
ae far as knn.n you cbnn on account of each 11 •r, of prnapecbve injury or damg6 Cte ng
SEE PACE 2 (Ot'ERt THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE:
i'�.
Insurance payments roveh-ed. It any, and name at Insurance Company:
Expenditure, made on sceount of accident or InJury: (Date —item) (Amount)
READ CAREFULLY
For all accident claims place on following diagram names of etraett Including North, Fiat. South, sad Nest, indicate phve of
accident by ' \' and by Showing douse numbara at dUteaea to street carriers.
If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter 'A" location of City vehicle when yyoouu first our It, and by'Ir location of yourself
or your vehicle when you tint or City vehcle; location of City vehicle at time of %" dens by -A-1- and location of yourself or your
vehicle at the time of the acciden• by ltd' ad the point of Impact by'X'
NOTR• If 01s_ v- bel+ do re• fit the eltuetloq attach "eta a ia,nwi Jugram signed by claimant
FOR OTHER ACCIDENTS
SIDEWALK
CURB -Y
r
OARKWAY
711 SIDEWALK
I F
y I FOR AUTOMOEILE e.Ct�
,)DENTS
7A\
Signature of Cement or person lilmg on his behalf giving Typed Name- Dale
relationship to Claimant: nn / r�
.18 Y11 I ROF£r Presentation J a false claim is a felony (Cal. Pen Code 110. 71).
Y-'
�' - CJISNS NUSP or FILED N7771 CZrY,CL:RF (GOV CODE SEC 915J).
.w", S"'IET sous"PADMO:r' ISTIMAAT
.. I Oi IEPAIRS
MARK CHRISTOPHER CHEVROLEE INC- ., A ,I all
2131 2131 East '0• St. ONTARIO, CA 91764 sleur No��
IVINEVM 01 -sOMP T PNEEaAYI
714% 983-0017 627.6444 W3 E i i 1 T
b.o..
. OMa� .MONa
.AMC
C0 A <Il• f ~ �� <OOl
A00,911 52
r 1
$/ CItAv C.7- T
IAMY[ LIST I M.K
20
�O I1111MM mw. WA oee
011[WM.I[NI a•tlMM./7,2 wad U US02_
IWWA M W4 al N _ }e Aa,blO Iul uMb.lnl n.MwN. •ll. % PUTS.
ry
P OPENITews
°�[n IW
s mm s r arMS ctlo,,M, a M. aAAps ntlnur amc �/� NAT' L
Semb PMM MAP M •YN W NMM ar AM AAUW INIPP avlxm Pon NISC� Lam_
ND. Web Or M[ 6Gea M Pleb rbwry YaM b Vrt•[ AMA Mebtll abr
valmMMsLPMI• tl l,Ar, IAI~jWl[ tl1IflT V , mM, AA uc � SOBIEY IIT_
IN W ti M •NMe 11 IA[ Mllblb Y YY eel W 1bb tl M/ rtla Y W N
.teW<. w a w.k MMM.wI•A w m, M a N w,e w wr r m+� SAIES TAT _
slulrl ss A, .•w W amrft m % r M 'b n ' IEa0yUFO E CAR 13I LEA K ESTIVATE TOTAL.
etibN•Me r a• geeetl 1 lMN Y pJ IKK
Nesr.sl Wl r It11 a.b Wl. NaM1YW latlleYl M w a,w1 em P ID IEFOAE CAR 11 Nf1IASED. Adv. CAarge[
IrbeW wrw.mwrswt.w Neb wnseM auur �' �
�a ^,WIAt•�9 h' - -' — - -- _Deb _ — TOTAL S
. .....�.. wM.a•• rw, unwwne ... u. un, a•. ••auo. u.o. an„ abMnlld as —
fAw T•n ✓Iku•. MV/YlJ..1 - ._.�.." «.«....,YI.TOa
.J.r. r M AeT
M O.Or.,,r• I..•
(.IwM.O U.. ••.4r r.wrw rY rY.w1 ✓L: ✓4,W✓..4 C.+Yk
IL STAN of WYOSTM C" ✓ San _
•� r . rr •r.. w r.w r .r +wr+ r....n .•r v — O.r AW82
to
` Nwrrw. •«.�. «�I.�4.r�.Mr• �I .��.... �+•T— .•+�•. w.. r.
•. +( + ♦ Yu ..•ri•• •w.w. r ,�. ••++.+. +�Yr+�`�.•..iV� F r W •i,.•+ .• '�.+ rr I M.
• 1
t•
A)NGTON aT iRANSR110R
S STAN OF C OnAA Owl J Sfa Bernardino 'SS 7Ih/C2
V �V W .,.. �..r ..� V r .•. •n+. I .+ W.
+ .�Ir= .�.r`rar,ar r.r.•r+..•��rir..'r •` rw.. •I. Y.. r..Y
!�� 1 w.� .y r.. r... � 4�...n ...r.r+.w Nr•r.�r rrr r�i«.�.�«r+.
t ., if T.r,✓.1 ✓LrwMJ A .A) ✓IY«rJ•1 IL low
CR077.00f Lae I.�SMO
11 -071501
4 +
11 Ta9yIS.5 Ibaalide;i... Q1450pCLIVW r1F.Ni cit? rdino
a
] pA'✓tIA. M'.r Tkh UA,, F.
• (i U1•tm.rer Ur O.11
0
O rJrdwS Tar+ _ — - . or col tASID YJ�2
❑b•w.S /a✓ — —_A4r
l +ti[ \yw \tM
--
:�`,T�:. ..•.. r-- ter.. --- � -- r. «., r.a.A.
i� +�'''.aati,•+i°a3 �c�.�:w..T ✓: u �.1.+•.� ^i.t�ti.�.. -.r. .. v. ���
Y__
4MNGT10N IOL AKOM0IK NTRARS Yn%fIU)
L TY)TS>♦ W IKfrX(O
art stay
TAX
lY T.D.
`xuuol...T Eaa ^ t
BNUafdiai
•.��'•. -Y, ,
nan ra
s.�.+. an ruff
m Sala
Be •
•
-34__
�)vt l4..r.w+✓S...SrwW.T.. ••.tw-�� -titicy flap
tar.hrJ.Iaf.IY.. «�
.
1 2 NAMf(SI 0/ MIK,wI{O
- $4'-t7lei3Teo n • • •..w.J.. f«. f.w.
hrms
'•�5' 4�'.
n..... or«
L nrgy
u«w. Rr«
,_
IQCi3760. Jaeewllaa
i, .sr.'• ;; >. �..;
OI ISATNKIgTYI
Par. rat.
� TIO.
f
•yK• - ~•�I � SS7 y.
• ..... •. ...i a -'A'--cr 20
liGtlCf9 a SLalq, Clblaa ABLR/ISTRATIOR
J
•• 9626 Baw111ta Rd.
1150.00
'7�8.91fIdd41 •'
". �r'Lrj'i]naeap 91701 'TMa
TTA1
fAw T•n ✓Iku•. MV/YlJ..1 - ._.�.." «.«....,YI.TOa
.J.r. r M AeT
M O.Or.,,r• I..•
(.IwM.O U.. ••.4r r.wrw rY rY.w1 ✓L: ✓4,W✓..4 C.+Yk
IL STAN of WYOSTM C" ✓ San _
•� r . rr •r.. w r.w r .r +wr+ r....n .•r v — O.r AW82
to
` Nwrrw. •«.�. «�I.�4.r�.Mr• �I .��.... �+•T— .•+�•. w.. r.
•. +( + ♦ Yu ..•ri•• •w.w. r ,�. ••++.+. +�Yr+�`�.•..iV� F r W •i,.•+ .• '�.+ rr I M.
• 1
t•
A)NGTON aT iRANSR110R
S STAN OF C OnAA Owl J Sfa Bernardino 'SS 7Ih/C2
V �V W .,.. �..r ..� V r .•. •n+. I .+ W.
+ .�Ir= .�.r`rar,ar r.r.•r+..•��rir..'r •` rw.. •I. Y.. r..Y
!�� 1 w.� .y r.. r... � 4�...n ...r.r+.w Nr•r.�r rrr r�i«.�.�«r+.
t ., if T.r,✓.1 ✓LrwMJ A .A) ✓IY«rJ•1 IL low
CR077.00f Lae I.�SMO
11 -071501
4 +
11 Ta9yIS.5 Ibaalide;i... Q1450pCLIVW r1F.Ni cit? rdino
a
] pA'✓tIA. M'.r Tkh UA,, F.
• (i U1•tm.rer Ur O.11
0
O rJrdwS Tar+ _ — - . or col tASID YJ�2
❑b•w.S /a✓ — —_A4r
l +ti[ \yw \tM
--
:�`,T�:. ..•.. r-- ter.. --- � -- r. «., r.a.A.
i� +�'''.aati,•+i°a3 �c�.�:w..T ✓: u �.1.+•.� ^i.t�ti.�.. -.r. .. v. ���
9%uxsiro's
(,(A�lano'Si
Slxzfer
WN • 202.11.1 Ho
Al`pVV4 Bdo
bnsa1...1r- Road
Po mono
F%rst
Federal
U
J
C
i
Q
.\9
`Q
u
I
0
0
0
w;
■.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Hay 19, 1982
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: John L. Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Base Line Reconstruction - Carnelian Street to Nest City Limits
He now have available completed desiqn plans and specifications for the recon-
struction and widening of Base Line from Carnelian to the >kst City Limits.
The plans were prepared for the C1tl by the Engineering firm of Linville-Sanderson-
Horn
The reconstruction project is intended to eliminate the anticipated bottleneck
at the Nest City Limits, when Upland has i6e. Street striped for four lanes.
the remaining areas of the project are scheduled for replacement and overlay
due to large portions of deteriorated pavement ant settling. ;toff, at this
Lice, requests permission to advertise a ".Notice Inviting Bids' for this project.
The project budget is §75,000.
RECOIVENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council authorize Engineering Staff to seek bids
for the Base Line Reconstruction Project.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:JL:hC
Attachment
r
a %m J4 "° "
F'
vi
cs
C9q
7
0
Z
C
� I c
S
�O
i
fy �'
a
I
LINE
PIZOJ F—Ur
L KAI15
1
J�-
0
rY OF RANCHO CMM%,,IONGA 61W4E Li
r`eccus rF
WIDLN P
ENGINEERING DIVISIC'N I.NECLAY
VICINITY NIAP
ei `, P29 2
n�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
q STAFF REPORT
DATE flay 19, 1982
TO City Council and City Manager G�
FROM Lloyd B. Hubts, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Tectnician
SUBJECT Acceptance of Parcel Map 6937 - Perez - located at the
southwest Cori er of Victoria and East Avenues
Parcel Hap 6937 submitted bf Trinidad Perez for final City Council approval
was approved by Planning Commission on September 23, 1981 This map is a
residential subdivision of 2.41 acres being divided into 4 parcels within
the R -1 zone Off -site improvements are to be completed 9rior to issuance
of building permits. Therefore, bonds ant an agreement are not required
prior to recordation.
It is recommended that City Council adolt the attached Resolution authorizing
the City Clerk and City Engn,oer to sign said map
eRes fully subml ed,
LBH: .bc
Attachments
,
C'
,\
,k z
,
:�
aa�
&
� , ;.`.•
C-
>3
��
Ulif
§
y
k
,
:�
1.
RESOLUTION NO. S:I -rC3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6937
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6937)
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Ma{. Number 6937, submitted by
Trinidad Perez and consisting of 4 parcels, located at the southwest
corner of Victoria and East Avenues, being a division of Parcel 4 of
Parcel 4590 as recorded in Parcel Map Book 46, page 53, County of
San Bernardino, California was approved by the Tanning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Hap Number 6937 is thu final map of the
division of land approved as shown on said tentitive parcel map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite
to app ^oval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now
been met
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the, City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 6937 be and
the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to
Present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record
• PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of May. 1982
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT
ATTEST-
Lauren 14 Wasserman, ty TTe7 i
n
LJ
on 0. 11 ke 5, 1Uyor
%y/ ii
0
DATE:
r"1
L
TO:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
play 19, 1902
City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City En;ineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Request to extend Improvement Agreement from Inco Homes for
Tract pia. 10491 located at the southwest corner of Victoria
and Carona Streets
Inco Homes has suLmltted the attached letter and extension agreement requesting
a one -year extension for their project, Tract No. 10491, a 20 lot subdivision
located at the southwest corner of Victoria and Ramona Streets. The bonds
and agrcaients for off -site improvements war! approved and actept8d by City
Council on June 17, 1981 and will expire on June 17, 1982.
Bonding imounts have not changed since the acceptance of Tract No. 10491,
therefore, an increase in the bonding amounts is not necessary at this time
It is recon"nJed that City Council adapt the attached Resolution granting
a ore -year extension for the improvement agreement for Tract Na. 10491 and
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same.
or -'to"" suom tied,
L6H K be
Attachments
m
F
I-
I
H
t
YIU blW� C/H' C/ RI /7M0 CY[I l,OYCL
IL.MNi IIY[u/� pp�0l.M4.L r L.Ltiwfl
Ff If FLMOIO .I � �y
.lnMMI..A/LfY Y � -!t /MW DiroMl LMnnt P lY' I
m m _ o rl
T7
7 VI
CL
CITT'.I5
sI
`��lr "v'�' CITY Op RA \CI 10 CI;CAA10 \'CA
��,°' " ENGI\ECRINC DIVISION
� 1 ISIOv �
y„nr — VICINITY MAP l YT
rise
T
■
A RESOLUTION OF 1HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
i CUMIONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXTENSION OF THE
IHPROVEHEN'r AGREEMENT FOR TRACT NO. 10491
above described Project,cpursuant been ofextension
Ordinancefor
28 -Bha
the Subdivision Ordinance. and
WHEREAS. the City Council approved the Improvement Agreement
for Tract No 10431 or June 17, 1982
Section 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
made the following findings:
A. That prevailing ecnnomfc conditions have caused a lack
of financing;
B That these economic conditions cake it unreasonable to build
at this time;
C. That granting of the tine extension will not be detrimental
to ts,e public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious
to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
NOW. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho rucamonga does hereby grant a one -year extansion for the Improvement
Agreement for Tract No. 10491 and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on
behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED AI4D ADOPTED this 19th day of May, 1902.
AYES:
NOES
ABSENT:
ATTEST
awn M. wd SSermaA. laty C erk
iJ
—Son Olt ik�e�z. Mayor '--
• v's � ; V :
ONCO 30 TdS:.
8 N C® p•r I r mEEVI- LCCS:0!l a1
li W 'e :1 ;L`1fEP.!!I� CfIIS:O!I
April 29 1982
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Box 791
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ,
Attention: Mr. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
Reference Tract 10491, City of Rancho Cucamonga
Dear Mr Hubbs:
Please consider thi3 letter as our formal request for a 12 -month extension
for Tract 10491. Due to economic conditions we have not connonced land
development or construction of any kind on this project to date. We will
sign an updated extension agreement as required by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Enclosed is our check number 4698 in the amount of $251.00 to cover the
extension fee.
He therefore respectfully request your assistance and consiaeration in the
granting of this request.
Sincerely,
EASTWI140 HONES, LTD., a Calif. Limited Partnership
By IIICO OEYELOP6ENT CORPORATION, General Partner
By
/— fr-C. Norris, President
ICH:bs
/ Enclosure
287 North lAountain Avonuo Upland California 9 1786 (714) 981.8989
r I • //
CITY OF MACHO CL"4m .
aM I VISIM I- PROYERM
CIMSIM ALREMRT
TACT NO. Ines
tAOM All MEII BY THESE PRESENTS- That Ws apneant Is ode AM entire! Nato,
In conforgece with tha pmvlslmi of the SYMletslon Map At o1 the CJ tI of Rarcho
CeKamnpaa California, a mnicipal corporation, by AM Ett"tn the said tltf, hanin-
alter nfened to a the City, a,A _U l Mores. Ltd
n Ca1llemfa Parer hi hemna nr ro t ta as • ae,.
WITNCSSETM:
TMAT, lalQl M, said subdteida entered into A subdislsion imroewnt agreement
With the City as a requisite to Approval of the FINI I40 OF Tnet m. 10491 c AM
WMEAS. said subdivider desires an eatansfon of ita to tomleta et, tern{ Of
tha Said .ibdl,isia, Imrerennt Agrerntl
ON. TMEFORE, It is harehf ARnad by
fol lass the City 414 by fold subdivider as
1 Tha I'aetatfol data of tha Gees Of tia said tutdlriston le,r,,m.t a9•eennt It
said o esmnt for r period of Iron the date of a{piratfo, of the
said prreant
g. Iecnue In iaproveaent secoritles to reflect mmct !mrovese,t costs shall to
Furntshe0 by the develepr With this Agrverent and shall be approvad by the City
Attarmy.
J. The n.TOfred bond arW the additioal prlmipal amunts th mf an rot forth On
Pape 1_ of this tgnemut.
a, All Other tarts and conditions of the tail subdivision iapm,mnt aenerent shall
retain the same.
As nidem, of undentaMing the provision, contained hertln, cad of Intent to cqv
With sea, •M Subd tide, Ms Subeltud the Nlaw described Ir�ro+ese1 aeuri p,
and has Am" his sigiutun benlo•
FAITHFUL PTIMIrmcE EOAD
Description: Additional Primlpl /mans:
Sunt1: LYvaiv, r In:urante Co. 10 {dllthu,at amunt
Addresu LOS Alultas, CA rmlred
MATERIAL A:D LABOR PATMFRT &V
Dtserlptim:
Additieeul Principal Amuet:
Surest: Dnelopan Insurance to, b additional aaunt
Writs: lot Aluilas. CA
regulnd
WM DEPOSIT MCOUK MTIRG bf1N
Additicnl Cash Deposit:
-i-
MAINTENANCE GUMAMTEE WO
To be Posted Prior to acceptance
of the tract by the City.
............. e ... ......
.......taoa..... P,IKipl AmOV t: Sd.00D.OD
...nouuo• o.w .00r„uuou
Clil OF RAXID CTICA14:.A
Eastwd "aces, lt! . a CaLf Potnrship
CALIFORNIA, a rem icipel
DEVELOPER: by IMO Developant Corp.
a"Poration
i- a panaC
E7:
,!w 1�
r rota, t,
for
ATTEST-
ROTE; Devdloper•s aI"t,M wit De
mtarind.
Ynn N. M{StM1bn7It1
ere
0
l J
n
U
1
' v
>7
MatTrIQ-rM A�7 In "^ [S'::tT[
C:Af -41`1'.T rLn\ :: TIT SO,r,J.2
iAlt..h ts ......... G+rY )
vr&-jr a CCCY: [D ST [ 6. Ibr
Ille ghrenu Car brav�q so e_ 17!
IAStt Mes wt tr t..r .. , +I In fa. vlu......... nr ;,rtvnt nrl,u-
t
ro:srua'lllr. ,,n rsn nr6
Or ITAMIM Mr.
137.3SS
ttr-. fl rt:..T cnr
22.649
T.T� =-.,
150.033_
faiunu r sraT +•2[ q0 .I0:)
160..0�0/��7_
IAIn A' -All 1 L10 (W-
_ CO.W.y _
L I.l Er M: 1:41:'Irn sfr
6.119
..-
°.n1 :r -.IS: w: ccsu
2.100
4
0'
0
CI'.:'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 19, 1982 `o
TO: City Council +mod City Manager + 4
t
FROM: Lloyd B. Nubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Accaotance of Tract vap 12176 - Daon Corp. - located between
Red Oak and Utica, north of Civic Center Drive
The Daon Corporation is submitting Tact Map 12176, an industrial subdivision
of 11.06 acres being divided into i5 rots within the Rancho Cucamonga Business
Center, for final City Council approval. Tentative approval was given Tract
No 12176 by the Planning Commission on April 28, 1982.
All off -site Improvements, with the exception of sidewalk and street lights
are existing. These remaining improvements will be constructed at time of
building permit issuance for irlividual lots.
Lot A. to be constructeu as a tennis court for benefit to all lots, will be
constructed when 60% of the total lots close escrow. This lot will be can -
structed by the developer witn construction. Wotenance and access beirig
nude a part of the C.0 8 R.'s.
RECOMRIENDATIM
It is reconmended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing
the City Engineer and City Clerk to sign said map.
Re,pectfully sub tteed.
BN :hc
Attachments
�5
j
W,
TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP N0. 12176
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RIR[ • E.DDmuO. or " .n,. or ruc , ..r .D n[C,.. rc.
Y/r *[CORDED o1 *0D. [I, Or ugll Y.ry, r.Ctl • T..OVOY I,rRCWErvE.
IR 1.E a rlcE er rYt CW.tt act000n Or ERE COO rT Or
CORRIT,$?A 01 CAEIrO*.4.
1D.1.D. 1110 ICD.W*1.1191 DWOI.1...Is•* C[ Does
61YL'®
I YYN.
L 1 �4www w 4
Y NY. YfL _tiM
w.M
IYwr • Iw f
IR. L.ID r +F4rwl wily \
r_Y w IF.IT41..
Ax y �J
t1D®
�/IY_ 14` r.Yr Y.YY
•w
Y Yom.•. 411Ynb Y 4rR
4 YI MY 1✓-1
.LLi1fD
YY*.. YrM YYrr. t1
1 �YY4 \w.Yw
4LV1.Y11
\ \\DV1YV1.1441
�*��_.. \ liel•II
• t
r � 1
4
41 �Y1Y wY
N.w44 Y1Y
IIIIYYR
Y IMM_
y r
I�t �
0
u
dl
t,
RESOLUTION 140.
A RESOLUTION G: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FIND:
TRACT 11AP N0. 1? "�
of 15 lots,Hsubmittedeby DannlCorporation aSubdivider76locatedsoe the
north side of Civic Center Drive, between Red Oak Street and Utica
Avenue has been submitted to the City of Pancho Cucamonga by said
Subdfvider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision
Nan Act of the State of California, and it compliance with the
requirements of Ordinance tio. P8 of said City; and
division of land approved„as shown is the
Map; and
to at rovalMof the final pebyrequirements he ty Council ofhsaidsCityrhavesnow
been t
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Vthatysaid Council of
be and •e same is hereby approved and tho City Engineer is authorized
• to preset same to the County Rrc -per to be filed for record.
oASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of Nay, 1982
AYES:
NOES
ABSENT:
ATTEST
auren t. Wasserman, C ty C er
37
Jon 0 M e s, Pay, •r
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAASONGA
= STAFF REPORT
DATE: flay 19, 1982
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FRai: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Cnamunity Developzent
BY: Rick Narks, AssociaLe Planner
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
ACT AS THE OFFICIAL CITY REPRESENTATIVE IN CONNECTION
M A SU N _ f1�J R 5 AHD NATIONAL A IRONHEN A
OLICY A R UQ IRE•yEN fS FOR THE COt:1U4 TY OEV LOPNENT BLOCK
HI PROGRAN.
Federal regulations concerning the Coamur'ty Block Grant Program -.quire
that the governing bod of all grantees authorize a person to a =t as the
` official representative of the grantee for purposes of sutaatttin2 all re-
quired documents and certifying that all requirements have been xet, in-
eludfno those Pertaining to thu National Environmental Policy Act
The attached Resolution authorize� the Mayor of the City to act as the
offic a! representative for Ranchn Cucamonga in all matters regard ng the
Block rant Program and thereby meets ftderat requirements
Rkspe tfully,subm±tted,
Director or Comsni'ty D
JL:R4:jr
Attachment Resolution
3Y
0
RESOLUTION t10. l . y1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ACT
AS THE OFFICIAL CiTY REPRESENTATIVE IN CONNECTION
WITH ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND NATIONAL
ENVIROtB;ENTAL POLICY ACT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development
regulations governing the Community Development Block Grant Program
require that the governing body of a city officially authorize a
ra.resentative of the City to submit the Final Statement of Community
nolectives, to certify that all feder.1 requirements have been met, to
act as the official representative of the City in connection with the
final submissicn and to provide such additional information as may be
requited; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga must authorize a person
M cu ^sent to assume the status of a responsible federal official under
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and other authorities as
specified in the federal regulations; and
WHEREAS, the persm• so authorized must consent on behalf of
the City and themself to accept the ,jurisdiction of the federal courts
• for the purpose of enforce- -e,t of their responsibilities as such an
official
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorized to act as the official representative
of the City in all matters and duties regarding the Comunity Development
Block Grant Program.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of May, 1982
AYES
NOES
ABSENT•
on 0 ke s, ttayor
ATTEST:
auren asm ty
3c'
LM
1
a
Li
0
,
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 19, 1982
TO Members of the City Council and City tanager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
BY Rick Marks. Assvctate Planner
SUBJECT: URBAN FORESTRY GRAaI: PLANT MATERIAL BIDS
On May 13, 1982, the MY received bids for plant material to be used in
the Urban Forestry Grant Pi,3ject in North Town. Six bids were received
with A -1 Nurseries submitting the lowest overall bid.
Plant Material
Quantity TvDe Size
300 Alnus Rhombifolia (White Alder) 15 Gallon
RECOIPIENDATION• Based on the bids received on May 13, 1982, It Is rea-m-
men ed t at t e City Council authorize the Finance Director to purchase
plant material for the Urban Forestry Grant Project from A -1 Nurseries.
Jape , tfully submitted,
i
JACK 1 A C�
Director of Community Development
JL:RM:jr
Attachments
.J
5
�"1
j
:r
r�
o
0
I
I�
G 3
a. 3
E
1 _
�i � rrttjj
f
1
0
0
RANCHO CUCAKONGA, CALIFOR'lIA
PROPOSAL TO FURNISH
PLANT MATERIAL FOR
URBAN FORESTRY GRANT PROJELT
Bids must be submitted by 10:00 AM
Thursday, May 13. 1982
"s
�(c
REQUEST FOR BIDS
The City of Rancho Cucamonga requests bids for Plant Material for the
Urban Forestry Grant Project in accordance with the project specifi-
cations
The bidder shall be required to execute the attached bidder's statement
to be eligible for bid consideration.
Bids must be submitted to the City Clerk by 10:00 a m. on Thursday.
May 13, 1982, at which time they will be publicly opened and read.
Bids must be submitted in a sealed envelope addressed to the City Clerk,
City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca if-
ornla, 91730 and marked clearly "Bid for Urban Fores ++y Plant liaterial ".
Interested bidders should contact Wendy Ambrose, Purchrsing Officer,
(714) 989 -1851 for specifications
PUBLISH: APRIL 26, 1982
MAY 3, 1982
of ..
9
0
+Y
_ Y4
iy
I*
BIDDER'S STAT6IENT
The bidder hereby agrees to provide the material described in the
specifications within _ days of the award of the bid
The bidder also agrees to extend price protection for the bid for a
period of _ days
The bidder further agrees that price escallation beyond the perioa of
price protection shall be borne by the City at manufacturer's invoice
cost.
Signed:
Notary:
`1,I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BIDDER'S PROPOSAL
TO FUR111SH
PLANT MATERIAL
FOR URBAN FORESTRY PROJECT
Bids duct be received by 10:00 A.M.
Thursday, May 13, 1982
City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga _
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130
Honorable Council:
In accordance with the established specifications, the undersigned
bidder agrees to provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga with plant
material for the Urhan Forestry Grant Project at the following price
including sales tar, FOb Rancho Cucamonga, California
Comoany.
Address:
Plant Material
p
♦ 1
�6
FORMAL BID PROPOSAI.
PLANT MATERIAL
I CO'10IT10N
A. All container grown snick shall be healthy, vigorous, well rooted and
established in the container in which they are sold. They shall by
free of plant disease-, insects, pest and their eggs Pldnts shall
not be pruned prior to delivery or shall have any trees been topped.
All plant material sh.-il be subject to inspection and approved by the
City and the City reserves the right to reject any or all stock.
I Container store shall hale been grown in the delivered
container for at least also (1) year, but not over two
(2) years
2 All plant material shall be uniform in height, diameter
and spread
3 Trees shall meet the following minimum requirement for
• caliper as measured 6' up from top of soil line, ani
height and spread
If
Cal. iper Height Spread
a) 15 gallon 5/8 to 3/4' 6 -8' 2 -3'
4. Trees shall be delivered at the latest by June 7, 1982.
B. All plant stock will be FOB Rancho Cucamonga City Yard.
330 I Alnus Rhonuifolia 15 Gal
Unit 1 Total
1,
I
BID LIST
is
Arbor Nursery
P.O. Box 273
Azusa, California 91702
213 -357 -4823 - Jim Redfern or Tony
A -1 Nurseries
I05DO Garfield
Huntington Beach, California 92646
714 - 964 -3546 - Keith
Valley Crest Tree
13745 Sayre Street
Sylmar, California 91342
213 - 367 -5603
Orange Co. Nursery
P 0. Box 0
Norwalk, California 90650
714 -523 -7720
Boething Tree Land Farms
23475 Long Valley Road
Woodland Hills, California 91367
213 - 883-1222 •
Select Nurseries
12931 east Central
Brea, California 92621
714 -523 -3711
Monrovia Nurseries
r 0. Box Q
Musa, California 91702
213 -334 -9321
Shibata Nursery
11581 Monte Vista Avenue
Chino, California 91710
714 - 628 -6184
Dan's Nursery
11064 San Pasquel
aona, California 91766
I
x
.1
,
0
CITY OF ItAiNCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 19, 1982
TO: City Council and City Ibnager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY Richard Cot &, Ass7cidte Civil Engineer
SUBJECT Request for Authorization to Seek Bids for t6a Construction
of Minor Drainage Facilities at various Locations within
the City.
The Engineering Staff has completed design plans and specifications for the
i'W0vement of minor storm drains at the following locations.
a Hellman Avenue south of 6th Street
b Archibald Avenue, northeast corner of 4th Street
c Amethyst Street at Highland Avenue
d. Sapphire Street at Banyan Street
These improvements are required to eliminate frequently recurring oavemert
damage resulting frog: nuisance water. Existing facilities are either
Inadequate or non - existant. Staff, at this tire, requests permission to
advertise d 'Notice Inviting Bids" for the subject improvements The Staff's
estimate for the improvements is 540,000
REC"ENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council authorize the Engineering Staff to seek
bits for the construction of minor drains at the locations indicated above
Respectfully su itted,
fLB RC•bc
Attachments
0
r
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAtONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: qty 5, 1982
TO: Memers of the City Council
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Co muni'y Developm
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 81 -02 -
TRTATIVE i CT T9 T5 - MAYER - A change o zone from
n9 a kamily Residential ' to R -3 1PD (Multiple
Family Residential /Planned Development) in conjunction
with the development of 44 patio homes and 322 townhouse
unL_s on a 35 acre parcel located on the south side of
Ar %t, between Turner and Center Avenues - APN 209 - 091 -05,
06, 07.
SLL4MARY. The proposal before the Council is 'or a total Planned
vbe elopment of 4. patio domes and 322 townhouse units on 35 acres
of land In order to approve the proposal, City Council will need
to approve the Zon; Change from R -1 to R -3 /PD and to issue a Ncga-
tive Declaration The Planning Commission, at its meting of
March 10, 1982, held a duly advertised public hearing to consider
the above desctibed project and approved the related Tract Map
with Conditions as attached and recommended approval of the
Negative Declaration arl change of zone.
Please find attacned a copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report,
which fully describes the project. Tha project as proposed is con-
sistent with all related City Ordinances and plans. The proposed
density of 10.8 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the
General Plan Lard Use designation of (tedium Density Residential
(4 -14 dwelling units per acre) No adverse environmental imtacts
are dnticipated as a result of this project.
The developer has been working on the design of this project with
the Citizen Participation Committee who represents the Nortn Town
.'esidents The design is intended to provide greater housteg oppor-
tunities for this area. The developers have designed a section of
the project as detached single family patio homes to blend with
the existing homes within the North Town area.
Planned Development 81- 02/Hayer
City Council Agenda
Clay 5, 1982
Page 2
CORREVONDENCE: There was no public opposition voiced at the Planning
Commission pub is hearing. This item was advertised as a public haaring
and notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the pro-
' ject.
RECOIMENDATIM The Planningg Commission recommends that the City Council
aoprcve Planned Development 81 -02 for the above described project through
adoption of the attached Ordinance.
R s gt+ly submitted,
JA�e� .+.
JACK CP
Director of Community Development
t:
JL:DC jr
Attachments Planning Commission Staff Report and Resolution of Approval
City Council Ordinance
0
�s
s.
• ORDINANCE NO. 175
A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0- ZANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSORS PARCEL h"ER
209 - 091 -05. OG, 07, LOCATED ON THE SWIM SIDE OF ARPOW,
BETWEEN TURNER AND CENTER AVENUES FR314 R -1 TO R -3 /P.D
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows
SECTION is The City Council hereby fines and determines the
following
A That the Planning Ccienissicn of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. following a public hearing held in the
time and aanner prescribed by law, recommends 'hP
rezoning of the property hereinafter described, end
this City Council has held a public hearing in the
tiers and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and
considered said recommendation
B Thdt this rezoning is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
• C. Th:., rezoning will hAve no significant environmental
impact as provided +n the Nagative Declaration filed
herein.
SECTION 2: The following des ^ribec real proper,y is hereby
rezoned in tFe gunner stated, and the zoning nap is hereby amended
accordingly
Assessors Parcel Numbers 209 - 091 -05, Ob. 07, approximately
35 acres in size and generally located on the south side
of Arruw, between Turner and Center Avenues, is hereby
changed from R -1 (Single Family Residence) to R- 3 /P.D.
(Multiple Family Residence /Planned 0evelopmtnt)
SECTION 3: The Flayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shat cape same to be published within f "teen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Report a nexspaper of
general circulation published in the ty of ntar o, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of Ilay, 1982
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT*
.M
.�7
i -
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
- n1i
wN
DATE: May !9, 1982
TO Members of the City Council and City Manger
FPJM: Michael "aWn, Senior Planner
SUBJECT TENiA.IVE TRACT 11915 - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 91 -02 - MAYER
CORPORATION - Located an the north side of 26th Street
Fet�reen rer and Center Avenues
At the May S. 1982 City Council meeting, the City Council conducted a
public hearing and first reading to adopt a Planned Development desig-
nation for the above - described project. During the public hearing.
Council questioned the location of the project in relttion to the security
of the project As s result, Sergeant Penn and Detective VanderNyck from
the Crime Prevention Task Force reviewPd the design details and site plan
of +he development from a security point of view, Sergeant Penn prepared
a memorandum to Captian iiickum, which all Courcilmembers have received.
which outlined areas of concern regarding security of the project.
On the morning of gay 19, 1982, the Planning Division stsfF and Sheriff's
Department net with rPp:esentatives of the Robert Mayer Corporation to
discuss these concerns and the mitigdtion to them.
Based on the Sheriff's Department memorandum, we discussed the following
matters with the developer; access to 26th Street, fencing and gates,
lighting, carports, landscaping, security devices, unit identification,
and appropriate visibility for routine patrol. The meeting was very
productive and the developer haj agreed to the following; eliminate
direct access from 260 Street.%4nstall wrought iron fencino_ and securit
appropriate lighting throughout thiv eve an , consf(Jer the carport
design within section 'C' of the project, utilize solid core dor; with
deadbolt locks and window locks, consider the landscape design and elimi-
nate low shrubbery that could limit visual observation of open are'.,
provide a comprehensive and well designed dwelling unit n=bering system
which will include a main directory sign, consideration of alarm system;
within the units, on -site security during construction, and will consider
designing the interior of the project to allow for enforcement of traffic
laws by the sheriff's Department.
Continued . . .
•Y i
�y TT 11915 - Mayer
May 19, 1982
Page 2
7ifese'arLraetalis which-will be worked on with the developer during the
final review of the project when it is submitted for final plan c
prior to issuance of building Permits, he deve opT er appeare to be con-
comply with them as much as possible
in order to make their project sellable and safe The Planning Division
staff and Sheriff's Department staft will continue to work with the developer
in regards to all ofthesomatters as the project progresses through the
final review proredures. The dw eloper will be available it the meeting
this evening should Councilma,mers have any specific questions on any of
these matters or the developer's ability to comply with thtm.
Sincerely,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAkTHENT
PLANNING DIVISION
v� {��tvfiV
MICHAEL VAIRIII
Senior Plannor
HV:jr
4
r]
L
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAfONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE
May 19. 1982 u
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager '
FROM* Jack Lam, AICP. Director of Community Development 4
SUBJECT PUBLIC NEARING TO RECONSIDER APDEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT
N0. 928 AND P.D. B -08 FOR 5.85 ACRES — S0 LAN L)
— OR S D I LARD ..VENUE AS 0 ARCN LO
A1•ENUE
BACKGROUND: On December 2, 1981 Council made the following motion in
regaar 'to the above - described appeal: 'Motion: Moved by Bridge, sec-
onded by Mikels to uphold the appeal in part by modifying the develop-
ment plan and tentative tract map to reduce the density to a maximum
of 9 units per acre, plus increasing the visitor parking within the
development, and condition the development plan and tentative design
to the Design Review Committee for design review approval." Motion
carried unanimously
On May 5, 1982 Council, after furth.r testimony, desired to modify the
above position and reduce the number of dwelling units to 59 units in-
stead of reducing the density to a maximum of 9 units per acre.
RECG }KNDATION: If the City Council still desires the modification,
staT recomoends the following modif4ed action: To uphold the appeal
In part by modifying the development plan and tentative tract map to
reduce the total number of units for the project to 59, plus increas-
ing the visitor parking within the development, and condition the de-
velop -nt plan and tentative design to the Design Review Committee for
dez i;n review a proval
Rem• ec(J fu ly s knitted,
K' /
„AC LA.' . IC
Community Development Director
JL:jk
Attachment
�r
ORDINANCE NO. 165
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RETONIhC ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
201 - 252 -32 FROM R- 1- 10,600 TO R- 3 /P.D. FOR 5 85 ACRES
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND, EAST
OF ARCHIBALD
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
following: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
at a public nearing hold in the time and manner prescribed
by law, considered rezoning of the property hareiaafter
described.
B That this rezoning Is consistent with the General Plan of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga
C This rcz� ng will have no significant environmental
impact as provi;ed in the Negative Declaration filed
. herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly
Assessor's Parcel Number 201 - 252 -32 from R -1- 10,000
(Single- Family on 10,000 square foot lots) to R- 3 /P.D.
(Multi - Family /Planned Development) generally located
on the north side of Highland, cast of Archibald.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance ind the City
Clerk shall cause [ho same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its pasongo at least once in The Dally Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published $ a the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, r1lifornin.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this d.•y of , 1982
AYFS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
0
lJ
0
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��qCi nrC
STAFF REPORT ,
f,
DATE: May 19, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
ts77
FROM: Lloyd B. Hibbs, City Engineer
BT: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT Ordering Annexation 19 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for
Tracts Numbers 11696, 10762 and 10277 -1
Attached for City Council approval is a Resolution ordering the work in connec-
tion with Annexation No. 9 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tracts
Nos. 11696, 10762 and 10277 -1 Tract 11696 is located west of Sapphire, north
of 19th at Garden Court; Tract 10762 is located at the southwest corner of
Foothill ho-tlevard and Baker Avenue; Tract 10277 -1 is located at the northeast
cornea of Carnelian and Almond Streets.
The developers, Vanugard, Acacia, and Barmakiad -Wolff have been notified by
mill of the public hearing and have submitted the attached letters of intent
to join the Landscape Maintenance District.
Tne Engineer's report, approved by Resolution No. 82 -72 on April 21, 1S82,
is also attached for your information.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council approve the attached Resolution ordering
the subject annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No 1 and finally
approving the Engineer's Report.
Respectfully spbmitted,
LBH:6K:bc
Attachments
�J
Z.
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Engineer's Report for
AMMATION NO. 9
to the
Landscape Maintenance District Number 1
TRACT 11696, 10277 -1. 10762
SECTION 1. Authority for Report
This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4,
Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streots and Highways Code. State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
SECTION 2. General Description
This City Council has elected to annex all new tracts into Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the
areas to be maintained wil. have an effect upo, all lots within Tracts
11696, 10277 -1 and 10762 as well as on the lots directly abutting the
landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to he maintained in the annexed
tracts are shown an the Tract Hap as roadway right -of -way or easements
to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucam;aga.
SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications
® The plans and specifications for the landscaping have Tn prepared
by the developer and have teen approved as part of the irprovement plans.
The plans and specifications for tho iandscapinv are 1-1 conformance with
the Planning Commission.
Reference is hereby made to the subject Tract Maps and the assessment
diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and
specifications by reference arc hereby made a part of this report to the
same extent as if said plans ead specifications were attached hereto
SECTION 4 Estimated Costs
No costs will be lrcurred for prkway Improvement construction.
All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical
data, contract analysis ani developed work standards, it is estimated
tnat maintenance costs for assessment purposes will e5val thirty ($.30)
per square foot per year Toese costs are estimated only, actual assess -
went will be based on actual cost data.
1.
The estimated total cost for Landscape Ilairtenance District No. I
area) Is ,ra q comprised of 11,332 square 'eet of landscaped
ishown •
Total Annual Maintenance Cost
S 30 % 261,346 square feet 78,403.80
Per Lot Annual Assessment
78,403.80 t 1440 54 48
Per Lot Monthly Assessment • 4.54
54 48 : 12
Assessment ;hall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and
the attached Assessment Diagram. Where the development covered by this
annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which
are designated for incl,,sion in the maintenance district but will be
maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall
be reduced by the amount saved by the District due to said homeowner
maintenance
SECTION 5 Assessment Diagram
A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is sttached to this
r,rort and labelee, -Exhibit A-, by this reference the diagram is hereby •
incorporated within the text of this report
SECTION 6 Assessment
Improvement for An,3xation No. 9 is found to .� of general benefit
to all lots within the Pistrlct and that as:essnent shell be equal for
each parcel
The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, 1582, to
determine the actual assessments based upon the act-,al costs ir:urred by
the City during the 1981/82 fiscal yea, which arL to be recovered through
assessments as required by the Landscape and Light'ng Act of 1972.
SECTION 7 Order of Events
1 City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings
2 City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Aprroval of City
Engineer's report
3 City Council adopts Resolution of intention tr Annex to District
and sets a public hearing date.
4 City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony
and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings.
5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the
City Council.
6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing •
and approves, or modif'es and approves the individual assessments.
r'
a
a
0
A13SESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANUCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.;
ANNEXATION NO.9
- ra. -., a.r rana tvt rna wiu.ss�
__ «r . l�
i
cirt orRnnc►IOCCtaAMoxcA TRACT
N0. 10277 1
T
. ' { EIN(A4EERING DIVISIO'J �i
un ' '. n•INII t AIAP PaB�
I
I
I
'r
��t f 11Iry�
�m
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOA
ANNEXATION NO.9
l®
Nip
S Q
� � 5
TY OF RANCHO CUQ\,\I(
ENGINEERING DIVISION
VICINITY MAP
�i
III
AA sTZ
hill
A
6pa-v
wr .
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
• ANNEXATION NO.9
•qq Yw (1 !!
Ytc!vpM
CITY OF RANCHO CMXNIO \GA tila TRACT
N0. 10762
ENGINEERING DIVISION
E± �'
VICINITY NIAP ^ :- — —
i Im
raze
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN
CONNECTION WITH ANNE1(ATION NUMBER 9 TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER I FOR
TRACT NO.'s 11696, 10762 AND 10277 -1
HHEREAS, the Ci.y Council of the Cf--y of Rancho Cucamonga did
on the 21st day of April, 1982, adopt its Resolution of Intention Ito. 82 -73
to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation Number 9
to Landscape Maintenance District No 1, which Resolution of Intention
No 82 -73 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as
required by law, shown by the affidvait of Publication of said Resolution
of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of
said Resolution of Intention, headed *Notice of Improvement', was duly
and legally posted In the time, form, manner, location, and number as
required by law, as appears from the affidav't of Posting said notices,
on file in the office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption
of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning
real property proposed to Wi assessed for the improvements described in
• said Resolution of Intentior. No. 82 -73, according to the names acid
addresses of such uwners a the same appears on the last railing or as
known to the City Clerk of the t,ity of Rancho Cucamonga, rd+ich said
copies were du,y mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by
law, as appears from the Affidavit of flailing on file in the office of
the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received -onsidered
evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in
this oreceeding and conce•-ning he necessity for the contemplated work
and toe benefits to be derived Uiererran and said City Cou.uil having
now a,quired Jurisdiction to urJer the proposed hark.
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho ucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires
the annexation to the district and the ordering of tie work, and said
City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in
said Resolution of intention No. 82 -73, tie done and nude; and
SECTION 2. Be it further resolved that the report filed by
the EngineerTFe—reby finally approved; and
SECTION 3. Be it further resolved that the assessments and
method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved.
L�
SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall
nvt begin unit 7 —after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied •
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTEC this 19th day of Nay, 1982
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Buren M Wasserman, ty er
on ke s, yor
•
•
s
B
AFFIDAVIT OF NAILING:
I, Barbara Krxll, Engineering Technician for the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby swear that I deposited in the City's out -going maii located in the
administration Building at approximately 4:00 p.m. on M4r_ 3a /9it the
attached letters to Vanuarg National Builders, Barnwkian Wolff Lang Christopher,
Architects and Acacia Construction, Inc. the regarding Annexation 113. 9 to
Landscape Maintenance Distrfr• No 1 for Tracts Nos. 10277 -1, 10762 and 11696.
ar ara Krall, Engineering lechnician
e
DATE •
R :MJ
jjs4�}'i"•6
. i-
/ r
'`vanguard Companies
10
February A, 1e92
CI' • r .
tr,! f )�
City of Rancho Cucamonga 3
Engineering Department Ay
P.O. Box 807 71�1�151fi ,1911121�1g15 G
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
II
ATTU: Hs Barbara Krall RE: Tentative Tract 11G9G
6 lots - Alta Loma
Dear Ms. Krall,
As requested in your letter of February 3 rind pursuant to
our telephone conversation of this date, pease be advised
that we intend to join the Landscape Hain_enance 6 Lighting
Districts with regard to the improving ar.d development of
the above referenced tract.
Should there be further questions, please do not hesitate
to contact my office.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. •
CAD /ms
Sincerely,
Colleen Dyck
Project Manager
VANGUARD VENTURES, INC
V49 rN Stmt, Nou.'m Cuumwg4 Gi,imms 91730 (713)
s
0
270 LAGUNA no. su1TE 100. FUr.LERTON, cA 92674
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9340 Baseline
Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. 91701
MIT 902-OM
Ap ^il 15, 1982
Re: Tract No. 10762
Gertlemen:
This letter is to serve as our Letter of Intent to ,loin the
City of Rancho Caumonga's Lighting and Landscape District as required
by the city's regulations.
smo
Very truly yours,
Rick
Vice President
CALOORRI♦ COnTRACTOM3 L,CtN, M29nU
•7rj
Y
0 5 ARCHITECTS
BarmaklanWolff LangChrlstopher
Hatch 10, 1982
Shinto Bose
Eneincerl:ng Department
9340 Base Line Road
P 0 Bot 807
Rancho Cucumoaga, CA 91730
Dear Shintu:
AU
1210 Fd
r ?wR
4
I am writing this lottrr in reference to tract 110217. I unders. and
that in order to have approval for this tract I mist file notice
with you of ny intent to join the Landscape Maintenance District
11
This letter is to confirm in writing my intent to loin Landscape
Maintenance District 11 and am prepared to sign any additiora!
documents required at such time that these are presented tw me
Hunk you for your assistance in this matter
-,""—Y \s ery truly,
ANDREH BARILU:IAN
Architect, A7A
AB/bb
101ARCHICENI'M 9375ARCHIBALA RANCHO CL•CAmoNGA CALIFORNIA 91730 710.987.0909
ANDREW EAPJAAKNAN* LARRY WOLFF• DICE LANG •GAYLAIRD CHRISTOPHER
0
0
01
STATE of CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
3 55
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
140TICE OF IMPROVEMENT
I, Lloyd 0 Nubbs, being dc:y sworn, deposes and says, that he is the duly
appointed, acalified Superintendent of Streets for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
and that pursuant to Res.ilution No 82 -73 of the Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, State of California, he on the 7th day of May, 1982, posted the
'Notice of Improvement" of the City Council's intent of consideration of
Annexation No. 9 to Landscape Maintnence District No. 1 which notice is attached
• hereto and made a part hereof; that Notice were posted not more than three
hundred (300) eet apart in a conspicuous place along each parcel of pivpe -ty
affecteu by Annexation No. 9 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1.
DATE:
Swarn and subscribed to me
this _ day of
1982
to arn
n
�\
uper nten eat o treets o
tJ,e City of Rancho Cucamonga
(j(9
0
CrrY of RANCHO CLUAN UA
STAFF REPORT
Date: May 13, 1982
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Bill Halley, Director, Community Services Department
By: Mary Whitney, Administrative Secretary, Community Services Iku I
Subject: Recommendations from historic Preservation %wmsission for
Point of iHstorlc interest and Historic Landmrk Designations
At the Historic Preservation Commission meeting of Jan,mry 12, 1982, a
Public Hearing was held to determine whether the Ledig House. located at
9404 La vine Street, should be recomended to the City Council for designation
as a Historic Landmark. After hearing public testimony, it was unanimously
decided that the Ledig home be recommended for such designation.
At the Historic Preservation Commission mceting of May 11, 1982, Public
Hearings were held to determine whether the Thorpe douse (Edgemont) should
be recommended for designation at a Historic Landmark and the Demens/Tolstoy
Home for designation as Point of Historic Interest. After hearing public
testimony, it was unanimously decided that the Thorpe Home (Edgemont) be
recommended for designation as Historic Landmark; and the Demcns/TOlstoy
Hnme be recommended for designation as Potnt of Historic Interest. These
homes are located at 9Se% Nilson and 9686 Hillside Road, respectively.
(please see attached draft Ordinances regarding the above referenced
recommendations)
His
,
. a
r
ORDINANCE NO. ��(!
AN ORDINANCE OF THR CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, RE'bGNIZINC
THE LEDIG HOME AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC
FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND
THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC
LANDMARK.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, foes ordain as follows=
SECTION it The City Council finds and determines
that the Le g Homo, located at 9404 Le Vine Street, has met the
criteria established by Ordinance No. 70 for Historic
Preservation within the City, and therefore, and with the
recor ondaticn of the Historic Preservation Commission designates
it as a Historic Landmark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
SECTION 21 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance
and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within
fifteen (151 days aft4r its passage at least once -- in The Dail
PC rt, a newspaper of general circulation published an t e C ty
Of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and AD)PTED this _ day of May, 1982.
AYESi
NOES
ABSENTt
Jon n. M kola, Mayor
A,rrCST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
�rl{
�w ,
0
ORDINANCE NO. 1 /
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY ODUNCJL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA. RECOGNIZING
THE THORPE HOME (EDGEMONT) AS A SIGNIFICANT
HIS70RIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A
CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK.
Tha City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, does ordain as follwsi
SECPICN It The City Council finds and determines
that the Thorpe r% a (Edgemont), located at 9588 Wilson, has met
the criteria established by Ordinance No. 70 for Historic
Preservation vithi•: the City, and therefore, and with the
recommendation of the Historic preservation Commission designates
it as a Historic Landmark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
SECrIGh 2: The Maycr shall sign this Ordinance
and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within
fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dail
Report, a newep: per of general circulation published in the -city
of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
• Cucanonga, Cal.fornia.
PASSEL, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of May, 1982
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATr. ?ST:
Laurco M. Wasserman, C ty C ark
Jcn D. Mikols. Mayor
P
•
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING
THE DEMENS /TOLSTOY HOME AS A SIGNIFICANT
HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AVD THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A
CITY POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, does ordi+in as follows:
SECTION It The Cit• Council finds and determines
that the Demene ToTtoy Home, locat,d at 9686 Hillsire Road, has
met the criteria established by Ordinance No. 70 for Historic
Preservation within the City, and therefore, and with the
recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission designates
as a Point of Historic Interest of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
SECTION 2: The mayor shall sign this Ordinance
and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within
fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dail
SPeport, a newspaper of general circulation published n the C ty
of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
•
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of May, 1982
AYESs
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren N. Wasserman, City Clerk
7c�
Jon D. M kels, Mayor
rirl OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Members of the City Council and City Manager
Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Carmniry Development
PUBLIC IMPROVV4BT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
This item was continued to this meeting; hOwever, since it is
not a pressing itsue, staff requests that this be continued for
an additional l0 days in order to receive further input from the
development munity.
Respectfully su fitted,
JACK LAN, AICP
Cormunity Development Director
O
MY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE May 19, 1982
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director
BY: Joan A. cruse, Administrative Secretary
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COK41SSION DECISION FOR PREPARATION
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE DE ELOPMENT
0 TEN—F TATYE�RA eve opment at a tots
planned residential opment of 185 single family
detached units and 14.6 acre park on 95.5 acres of
land in the R- 1- 20,000 zone located on Hermosa Avenue,
north of Hillside.
This Item was continued to this oriting date. Attached are previous
stall reports
Res ectfu'nyhmTtted,
r
JACK LAN, AICP
Community Development Director
JL:jK:jk
Attach
.a
•
0
C
CITY OF RANCFO CUt,AMONGA
STAFF REPORT
nC%./—o lc"r" z
�sn �
DATE April 21, 1982
TO Members of the Cit, Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Comn nity Development `irector
BY: Joan A. Kruse, Administrative Secretary
SU8JECT: AP DEAL OF PLANNING CDMMISSIDN DECISION FOR PREPARATION
0 AN ENY IRONMENTAL lMPA5T REPORT FOR THE DEVELDPMENT
Ut IERIATIVE TRACT 933 - A development o a Iota
p annT d residential deve orment of 185 single family
detached units end 14.6 acre park on 95 5 acres of
land in the R- 1- 20,000 zone located on Hermosa Avenue,
north of Hillside.
At its meeting of March 17, 1982, Council continued this it,a pending
the finalizing of negotiations for the acquisition of a prrtion of
t'- subject property for use as a City park. Attached is the staff
report which was prepared for the March 17 meeting.
RECOMMENDATION: The matter is academic since the original oroject
Ts—UFa—nged—wTt—h the purchase of the park Technically, hoNever,
there is a legal appeal pending and :aid appeal must either be
heard and decided upon the merits of u,: original application or
the appeal withdrawn by the appellant. S:nce no withdrawal has
been requested, the Council mutt address itself to the former
submitted,
ty Development Director
JL:JK:jk
Attachment
< CITY OF RANCHO CCMIOA'GA
r STAFF REPORT
I
DATE March 17, 1992
TO 4embers of the City Council and City Manager
FROM Jack Lam, AICP, Director or Comwnity Development
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJELT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION CECISION FOR PREPARATION
OF AN ENVIROILMENTAL IMPACT REPART f R TBE DEVELOPMENT
DFYENTATIVEYUg 1933 - A development or a tots
Planned residential development of 185 single family
detached units and 14.6 acre park on 95.5 acres of
land in the R- 1- 20,000 zore located on Hermosa Avenue,
north of Hillside.
BACKGROUND The appeal of this project was originally introduced to
the-CounU. at its meeting of October 7, 1981 At that meting, the
Applicant hai requested continuance of consideration on the appeal
Subsequently, the hearing on the appeal has M -en continued at the
request of the Applicant to tonight's meeting Over the last several
months, the Applicant has been negotiating with the City's Director
of Community Services and the Parks Subcommittee of the City Council
for the possible acquisition of the west portion of the project along
Hermosa Avenue for a public park
Please find attached a copy of the October 7, 1981 Staff Report to the
City Council ehich outlines the issues of the appeal In addition,
excerpts from the Planning Commission Minutes of August 26. 1981 and
the Commission Staff Report have been attached for your review and
consideration Since this project has been continued for some time,
a final decision by the Council is urged in order to allow the con-
tinuing processing of this project.
ANALYSIS: Currently, the official application and project on file
Tn--th—TISTinning Division encompasses 95 acres of land located on
both sides of Hermosa Avenue, north of Hillside Avenue The require-
ment for the Environmental Fact Report that the Commission made was
based upon the implications of this total project. A decision of the
Council is needed in regards to the Planning Commission's decision for
requiring the preparation of an EIR for the total project. If the
City Council upholds the Planning Commission decision, then an Environ-
mental Impact Report would have to be prepared for the total project if
� C.
Appeal of Planning Commission Recision
•• City COLncil Agenda
varch 17, 1982
Page 2
the Applicant elects to proceed with the project .s presently submitted Since
the Aoolicant is negotiating with the City in regards to the purchase of a park
site, the project design and c,, -,racter may change significantly which could
change the imolications of environmental immact. If so, then the Applicant
would need to refile a re,Ased oroject and staff would conduct another Initial
Study to determine if an Envirormental Impact Report would be needed on the
revised oroject.
Therefore, the Council's decision this evening it on the total overall project
as it is now presently submitted on file in the Planning Division The Appli-
cant's ootions are to either withdraw the apoeal, withdraw the current project
and subait a revised project, at which time a mew envir:rmental assessment will
be conducted, or continue with the present project as submitted in accordance
with the Council's decision on this appeal.
RECUf1ENDATION: It has been recd ended by the Planning Commission that an
VTY1_ro_nm_en_t_aFTmpact Report be prepared fer the devLlopment of Tentative Tract
11977 as presently submitted and on file in the Planning Division. If a revised
• project is desired to be submitted ti the apolicant, then a new environmental
assessment will be conducted to determine if an Env'ronmental Impact Report is
still needed
Re:pectfull submittted,
JACti
Director Of Community Development
JL.MV.jr
Attachments October 1, 1991 City Council Staff Report
Eacerots from August 26, 1981 Planning Commission Minutes
Planning Commission Staff Report of August 26, 1981
CITY OF RANCHO ClolONGA
STAFF REPORT
OCTOBER 7. 1981
TO: Members of the City Council and City 'tanager
FROM: Jack Lam. Director of Community Development
BY Nichael vainn, Senior Planner
SUBJECT. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION FOR THE PREPARATION
OF All ENVIRONMFNTAL IMPACT Rr,PORT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 11933 - A 185 single family planned
development on 95.5 acres of land located on Hermosa Avenue
north of Hillside
ABSTRACT The Planning Commission, at their meeting of August 2E, 198'
nquirea the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the develop-
ment of Tentative Tract No 11933. The Ctrmmission's decision •,as based upon
the initial Study which was prepared In accordance with the State Environ-
menta' laws and which indicates that potential significant adverse impacts
may occur as a result of this project. The Planning Commission Staff Report
and an excerpt frnm the Planning Commission minutes i. attached for your
review It is rr -amended that the City Council uphold the Planning Commis -
decision to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for
this project.
BACKGROUND. Attached is a copy of the letter from Richard Scott, Chair..mn
0o turd for Woodland Pacific Ow.elopnent, Inc who has rev;• seed an
appeal of the Planning Commission decision for the nrt;,oration of an Enviorn-
mental Impact Report on the above - described pr„ject. Mr Scott's reasoning
for the appeal is not based upon the reaalssion's review of the Environmental
Assessment and the type of Impact., that are associated with this project, but
rather based upon reasons that previous discussions on the protect, prior to
tta formal submittal, did not Indicate that an Environmertal impact Report
would be required. Mr. Scott's letter refers to a numbe. of projects being
submitted for review dur'ng the last 13 months None of the projects which
Mr Stott refers to were forrTl applications, but were cone. •tual Plans that
were teing shown to the Commission and Council during the General Plan process
to show the type of development that could occur on their site The majority
of the site is Genera, Planned for park and the developer was trying to per-
suade the Council, wring the General Plan hearings, that development could
be compatible In the area
�G
;�, aA
• Staff Report
EIR for TT 11933 -2- October 7, 1981
During review of the Conceptual plans at the General Plan hearings, no
environmental analysis was done since no formal application had yet been
submitted The applicants submitted an application on April 29, 1981
and staff notified the applicants en June 1, 1981 that the project
application was incomplete and additional material was needed. Following
the submittal of additional material the applicant was again notified
on June Z6, 1981 that his project was complete for processing and that
final acceptance is not cmde until all environmental documents and findings
are complete as required by the California Environmental Quality Act.
Following a notification of acceptance of the application for processing,
the project was scheduled for Design Review Committee and Growth Management
Review Committee un August 4 and 6, 1981 respectively. Following the con -
clu•ion and findings of those Committee meetings, staff's environmental
analysis was completed which resulted in a finding of potential significant
adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. This
recommendation was then forwarded to the Planning Commission who acted in
favor of the preparation of the EIR. At the Planning Commission hearing,
two citizens in close proximity of the project, testified before the Com-
mission asking for the preparation of an EIR because of the environmental
factors related to this project.
Our Attorney has . ndicated that environmental review has been an active
area in the courts and some standards for judicial review have been developed
regarding the rego rement for environmenta. rayoits. The Attorney indicated
that if reasonable minds are questioning whether or not significant impacts
will result because of the project than the courts have upheld the decision
for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. Further, the State
Environmental Guidelines state that where a substantial body of opinion
considers or will consider the effect of a project to be adverse that the
lead ..yency should prepare an Enviornmental Impact Report to explore the
enviornmental effects involved with the project.
RECCWtiNDATiON: it is recommended that the City Council uphold the Planning
omm ski sign decision to require the preparation of an Enviornmental Impact
Report for Tentative Tract No. 11933.
Respeci uULO tteed,
-
JACK LAN, Director of
Community Development
JL:MV:cd
Attachments: Letter of Appeal from Woodland Pacific Development Inc.
° Excerpt fraro the August 26, 1981 Planning Commission Minutes
Planning Commission Staff Report from August 26, 1981
7%
'r
/ t
Hr Rougeau replied that parcel 2 or 3 would muse this to happen and
both projects would have street improvement plans that are under process S
of ipprnval and these improveantc could be worked to as pert of their
street improvement.
Chairman King opened the public hearing.
Doug None, OPPlieant, stated that a great deal of time and money had
been placed on the study of this Intersection he further stated that
the applicants would be paying their System and Development fees to the
City, as would the other projects, mad he felt that this cash flow would
take care of the funding problem of the signal The drainage problem
had been mitigated satisfactorily between the efforts of City Staff and
the project engineers and Mr. Hone felt that surrounding properties as
well would benefit from these improvements to this project.
Chairman King asked if there were any further public comments, there
being none, the public hearing was closed
Comalscioner Renpel stated that he fult ccnfident clot the Systems and
Development fees from the apartment project or any other project in that
area wou.J be sufficient to cover the installation of the traffic signal
Commissi,ner Tols:oy asked if the reworking of I.ceon Avenue was going
to cake care of the water runoff on that street
Hr Rougeau replied that in the future a storm drain is planneJ to •
supplement the existing pipe to get the water Into the ground This
project drains entirely onto Haven Avenue
Chairman King called for the motion
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to
adopt the Resoluclo/. approving the revision to Condition for Site Approval
No 80-01
e e A a R
C TFVTATIVE TRACT NO. 11933 - woOnLAND PACIFIC - A public hearing to
eansldnr a requirement for preparation of ac Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) on a total planned tea itial development of 185
single - family detached units and 14 ,.re Park on 95 5 acres of
land In the R- 1- 20,000 zone located on Hermosa Avenue, north of
Hillside
Mlcluc! Valrin, Senior Planner ecviewud thu Staff Report
Clubman Ring asked 4r V.Irin If what vas before the Commission at this
neating var the determination of t,,her or not the project In question
needed an Environmental Impact Report
Planning Commfaslon Minces -8- August 26. 1981
-r
�L
0
■
Mr. Valrin replied that this we Staff's intention.
Cczalssloner Dahl asked if the density of the project had any bearing on
the draft EIR.
Mr Valrin replied that the density was over the two dwelling unit per
acre designation of the General Plan and would, therefore, enquire a
General Pia„ Amendment. Hwevor, Is nor the sole reason for an EIR.
Commissioner Dahl called attention to the fact that a Resolution had
been adopted by the Plam.ing Com<aissian regarding lots In the R -1- 20,000
zone classification that the lot sire would b.- 20,000 square feet net
Mr. Vairin seated that this would have to be reaolvee by the applicant
In the EIR process.
llr Vairin stated that the EIR would cover many aspects of the project,
one of them being the land use category
Commissioner Dahl stated that the General Plan desi ;natea the vast side
of Mertrosa as park
Chalrmn king opened the public hearing.
Pete- Templeton of the Planning Center in Mevport $each, represented %It
Dick Scott of Woodland Pacific He stated tha: this o:oject began
approximately a veer ago and at -hat tlme represe. r -.Sven of the Planning
• Center had met with City Staff to one what the reouirements would be for
this project and if an EIR would be necessary. Mt. Templeton stated
teat staff informed him that an EIR wuulo not io .cqul.cd He further
stated :Aar geologic, soil, and hydrology reports had been obtained by
the Planning Center As well as the stady into ♦arlous types of fire
retardant building matorlals. He said that the applicant would be
willing to sell the property to the City As a p u'4 or to develop one
quarter of the property and give three - quarters, :o the City as a park as
well an many other alternatives De stated that Me Scott would be
placed under a firanelaI burden if his project were pontpcned anotner
five or six months whlle an EIR was being processed
Commissioner Dahl stared that the roperty in question Fas been for sale
since April and that this applicant my not necessarily be the person
who would develop this property therefore he felt that I. cnsld not be
deene•1 a lordship that the Commission would be Elating on the applicant
to request an EIR
Mr Templeton replied that this was placed In the newspaoer appro•d,.stely
nine months after anbmittal and at that time Me Scott felt that h: as
gettfng nowhere with this project.
er Vairin stated thit he would like to clear tp three item.. wl•lch Mr.
Templeton commented on. One comment bolnq the length of time since
.y
E Pl,mning Cormission Minutes -9- August :G, 1981
A.
the project was filed. Mr Valrin &rated that the project was not
officially filed until April of 1981 -he second issue is not whether
or not the City would be losing a pork Lu: !e that the area is rensrat
Planned for a park and the person who develops that land will have to
deal with the issue of whether the City wishes the development of a park
The third issue was the denai.y factor and this would be one of the points
of the EIR.
Ronnie Steven, who lives in the area adjacent to the project site, stated
that she was in favor of an EIR because of the very serious drainage,
circulation, and police and fire problems in the area.
Christine Benoit, Alta Lama resident, asked If the project would be
brought back to the Planning Commission for a public hearing attar the
completion of an EIR.
Hr Valrin replied that the EIR would be used to help mold and design
the finished project or help the decision makers to decide whether the
project should be approved He explained that the EIR is a tool to
determine the kinds of impacts as a result of this project the way it
Is proposed or alternatives to the project.
tit Lam stated that the developer of this property would have serious
drainage problems to consider as they were at the too of the Alta Loma
Channel and this issue would be a consideration of the developer
Cor_Issionar Sceronka asked for an explanation of what the Cottaission's
responsibllltirs were when a project such as this wee filed with the
City
Yr Lam replied that anyone is free to submit an application to Coe City
with what ever proposal they have
Christine Benoit stated that she hoped that the Comissicn would keep
In mind that the beauty of the arm was the reason for desigvting rho
area as park in the General Plan
Chairman Ring asked if there were further public comments, there being
nano, the public hearing was closed
Cemol.sioner Sceranka stated that he was very concerned about this particu-
lar piece of property. ne stated that very few cities In the area are
fortunate to have o forest and it was his intention as a Planning Comts-
stoner to retain this piece of forest as the r neral Plan designation of
park He further stated that economic eon.ideration. of the applicant
were not an issue that the Planning Commission should deal with. Con -
mis.toner Sceranka rtated that lie was totally opposed to any mechanism
other Men nn CiR for title project which would discuss the Issues pre-
sented by Stiff
Planning Comission Minutes -1G- Au-,ust :6, 1981
�i,J
•
Chairman Ring stated that he felt chat as EIR should not be required for
the property The tyna of det•olopment he felt was appropriate for the
area would be of aarh extremely low density that . would not mitigate
environmental impacts. He further stated that e%eryona vas aware of the
mitigating circumstances of the fault zones and drainage probims plus
all of the other areas addressed In the reports attached to the Staff
Report and it was his opinion that if the property were planned properly
at a very law density that there mould be no impacts. He felt that the
project as proposed wvul -ve many Impacts but if it were planned properly
it would not.
Comissioner Dahl stated that density would have a tremendous amount
Of Impacts and the decision at this meeting swat be based upon the ten-
tative map as It was submitted to the City. He asked if the Ccmission
could state that based upon the density shown, an EIR would be required;
however, if the developer wished to cone tack with A lower density, the
EIR would be reconsidered.
4r Vairin replied that the decision is to be made on whether or not an
EIR must be Made on this tentative map ,a submitted. If this statement
Is Made to the developer, they would have the option to drop this ten-
tative and draw up a completely acv project thus necessitating a new
In.cial Study to determine what potential impacts would be created from
that project
gob Dtv,herty, Assistant City Attorney, stated that the area of environ-
rental review has been an active oroa in the courts and some standards
• for judicial review have been developed to either require or not require
EIR's He further stated that the trend of the decisions have been to-
wards the requirement of an EIR if there is any doubt on how the issue
shou.d be resolved If the question of whether or not significant to-
pact, are a result of the project is debatable, then the courts deem
that an EIR should be prepared The affect upon a developer in not to-
qutrinR an EIR when one should be required could be tame severe than if
• 4e -11tive Declaration vas issued and a court ordered an EIR prepared
• year or so later. It could have a financial impact upon the City as
the attorney fees are frequently awarded against the City where the
decision was not to require an EIR and the City was sued over that
decision.
Co_ isafoner Sceranka asked if this area ras designated as a park In the
Centraj Plan shouldn't the Comissto- he acting upon n negative impact
an the Cersral Plan ametmment before attain on the tentative .Ap
4r Vairin replied that it would be done concurrently.
Ct alssioncr Sceranka stated that he could not understand Chairman Ring's
statement that thorn are no negative inrat to or an EIR required on a
piece of property where a Cenoral Plan amendnent would have to be Made
from a park deslR'lation to n proposal for a subdivialen development Ha
felt that an EIR would must definitely he required when you were eon
` plctaly changing the land uwc of a Piece of proPerry
Plcnning Commission Minute, -tl- Auqu,t 26, 1991
T-1
r-
't
C
ilr. Vairin stated that the State Guidelines states that public contro-
versy alona vas grounds to require an EIR, despite the issue of density.
Commissioner Sceranka stated that the proposal on this property is to
take a public park and make it a private park.
Corratssloner Rempel stated that It Is not a park, it is a proposed possible
park. He further stared that he was in agreement with Chairman Ring that
the applicants came in with a proposal of a much lover density He also
stated that a stuty of the fire danger in that area should be looked Into
Chairman Ring asked for a motion
Nation: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl, carried to require an
Environmental Impact Report for Tentative Tract 11977 Chairman Ring
voted No on this project for the reasons stated previouely.
AYCS: CMUISSrONERS: TOLSTOY, DAHL, RCtPEL, SCERANKA
NOES: CONNISSION'ERS: KIN *C
ABSENT: CWOIISSIONERS: NONE
a e e a e
OLD EUSINESS
Corttssioner Sceranka asked about the status of a Resolution or Ordin-
ance he requested to have drawn up requiring all residents buying a home
In the City to sign off on the General Plan Nap
He Lacy replied that a priority list of ark program would be brought
back to the Commission and they would be able to select whLeh ones to
act on first
NOW BUSINESS
Co- tsaionor Rmpel requested that Scoff suggest an Ordl •cc to the
City Council whteh would state :not any tine a house is remndelA n
tcproved over a certain peree.tage the Planning Cnrmisslon could re-
quire the dedleattons and ieprovcnents necessary to oe made to the
property
Cc- r,i•ctoner Dahl asked Hr Lis if he had reached a decision on having
one or two Coalssloners present at tee meotlig with the homemmera
concetned with the 'ar'borrugh tract
itr Lea rcpltcd that tilts tied the hreowndrt express,d a desire to
meet with Statt only Nr l..= stated that he would report back to the
Cotssission the hear itscussrd at this meeting and try to arrange fnr the
Cvmmi%nionern to he in itterd.ace at a lacer aeettnq with the hreemi.-rs.
Planning Commission 'linutem -12- August 26, 1981
Ll
40
C
August 26, 1981
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ILtSFStNrwr me Trurern.r r,..» ^
aacacnea units and a 14 6 acre park on 9515 acres of land�ln
R- 1- 20,000 zone located on Hermosa Avenue, north of Hillside.
ABSTRACT: The project is a single family re ;identfal development submitted
nTn accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance Since this project
appears to have environmental concerns, an Initial Study was perpared for
the Planning Commissions consideration and review
BACKGROUND: The project is located on the east and west side of Hermosa
Avenue, north of Hillside. The project site totals 95.5 acres 185 single
family detached homes are proposed to be built on 80.9 acres while a park
will be developed on the remaining 14 6 Acres. Tlie proposed Tentative Tract
Map, Exhibit '60, indicates that 149 lots are 12,000 sq. ft. and 36 lot are
20,000 sq. ft urrent zoning is R- 1- 20,000, and the General Plan designates
the majority of the property as a proposed park site. The applicant is re-
questing a General Plan Amendment to very low density (less than 2 dwelling
units per acre) and a zone change to the PO Combinfng District The surrounding
zoning and land use is provided on the attached Zoning Map (Exhibit "C ").
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: Approximately 805 of the site is densely covered
wl th 6. -year o d r rqum Eucalyptus trees which are in good condi Lion. The
overall gradient of this site is approximately 10: with the slope running
north to south. The majority of this site empties into a natural drainage
course which flaws northeast to southwest Runoff from the easterly portions
Of tnis site travels into a channel which runs along the east project boundary
then turns west along the south of the property line Surface runoff Is very
slow and the erosion hazard is slight. Cutting across the northern part of
toe Hermosa LAvenue,1eaCconccrrete reservoi Existintheevelopment ontsite es limited
service road along the north project boundary, several internal dirt roads,
and small uorzon pits in the northwest portion of this site
The pr:ject site is bounded on the north by the foothills and isolated single
family homes To the southeast lies an existing single family residertial
development. A subdivision application, Tentative Tract 10088, has been filed
along the western project boundary To the south and east there is a variety
of land uses including agricultural uses, single family residences, vacant land,
and a flood control basin.
ITEII G
r
TT 11933 (P 0. 81 -03) S
Staff Report -2- August 26, 1981
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by
the app cant an s attached for your review Staff has conducted a field
Investigation and has completed Part II of the Initial Study. Following is
a brief discussion of the major issues and potential adverse impacts which
may occur as a result of th's project.
1 Drainage: Currently, the onsite soils are excessively drained and
the absorption rate is high. This project could significantly increase
runoff by increasing the amount of impervious surfaces which do not
allow water to seep into the gound. Compuunding this problem, Is the
fact that approximately 750 acres of land outside of the project area
drain into and across the site The magnitude to which the increased
runoff will affect the ground water table and erosion potential is not
known
2 Biota: Removing a large number of Eucalyptus trees from the site
ccuM significantly reduce a wildlife habitat whict. 's unique to this
area The environmental impact of this action is ...L known
3 Land Use: Since the project site is designated as a park in the
CenerTPlan, construction of this project may necessitate the need
for another park in th.. general vicinity It is uncertain whether the
short term benefit of the development of a 14 6 acre park will override
the City's long -term goal of providing a much larger park some time in
the future. Also, the economic feasibility of the City developing the
entire Eucalyptus grove as a park, or the feasibility of purchasing an
alternate site must be considered
A determ. nation of the most appropriatz land use configuration and density
should be made The possible alternatives could range from the clustering
of homes on smaller lots to maximize open space or to maintaining a minimum
lot size of 11 acre or larger throughout the project site
t Public Safe: • Public Safety is a concern which must also be addressed.
TIM nta n ng the maziwm number of Eucalyptus trees will make the homes
highly susceptible to fire Potential fire hazard 1s increased for this
site because the northrn project boundary abuts the foothills Also of
concern is the Cucamonga Fault which runs through the northern portion of
the property Since the magnitude of an earthquake in this .fault could
reach 6 S to 7 0 on the Richter Scale, there is a significant public safety
concern
w
r
' TT .1933 (P.D. 81 -03)
Staff Report -3- August 26, 1981
RECOMMENDATION: Based upon staff's review and preparation of the
Initia Study, it is recommended that an Environmental Impact Report
be prepared for this project. If the Commission concurs with this
finding, then the scope of the E I.R. should be determined by consi-
dering the information presented in the Initial Study, this report,
and the public hearing.
Respectfully su mltted,
JACK LAM, AICP
Director of Community Development
JL:CJ:cd
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - vicinity Map
Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "C - Zoning Map
Exhibit •0" - Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Grading (two sheets)
Exhibit "F" - Natural Features Ma
Exhibit "G" - Conceptual Landscaping Plan
J
J
C•.
------ - - - -
I
I 1
.
1 !
CT F I 11
1
-
-
1
,
RCANHO - - -
"
1
U NAMONGA ;
.
1yr
1 .�
A
_ ^
1
fl
1
1•
71.x..
VICINITY MAP
NORTH
CITY OF rrN16('
RA \CIIU CL'G%,,NfO \G/1 ��;1 y, .1r
PLANNING DIVISON Exi ma, "A" sc\LE,
to
•
9
gRE t UC ODS 19 a GtOCK) C�;t;��7:'0S�J�r�
#..
A Planned Cunrrunfty by Woodland Faciflc Development, Inc. �� <c
TZMrA" TRACT Na 1193!
wwt �rr•.au�q,l.�,
•a•mvla+mu.v --
LZM
� w
y
�
A
�
�.•
C�'3.i 1• L�w,..o�
� - .7P q
q
iG.i�"8S'iriP
o A a �s
w a
4' $ w w
w
Mw
Q
'
\1
•
•�C{IfZ�iCL _
•� O iA �
;�• t
� ' �
O
\��
1 +s
yJ ��l�•i�i� %�.
•
•
A P�
I
�q A , -a ® W ,
w
v
•y _
_
�
ai W � A Q � f9
� __
I +L•
�
Y t
O \ Q 14 M •4
wr �1. 1I
I• H.
G J
gRE t UC ODS 19 a GtOCK) C�;t;��7:'0S�J�r�
#..
A Planned Cunrrunfty by Woodland Faciflc Development, Inc. �� <c
MONKS � ao
[Op
v:42 a CCD-s 4T %VjC: -jjo CUCajwrC)7 &:a
A Planned Community by Woodland Pacific Development, Inc.
r
E oil
aN
• STREET SECTIONS
G
............. awl /
eLMDWG
SETUCKS ;•;.
II ,\
1
i c
O _
- .,.THE WOODs AT RZ�t�rr� C�3t�Ji►.�i���1
A Pivnned Community by Iod :and Pacific Development, I
11 it
Faz «. ,
��a a
VIC_WTY IAAP
MPM.Ua
�=
C
CONCEPTUAL
� I
nRY Y•A.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
q 1.9q
AKUY (qY d�Y ••Y•q L. .�-
1 1
MtY YYgq
wwswq� nar
rl�
M.•. = OgV•wq•
�a
c - _
T.
Ntt� •y
Ul
YLIIA N
I:�H* o, R n
G ryl
1►� m ci
1.i -
r,
•MtiYM II�Nr�f1 •q yWyyyy�,I IU�U
M1.vlYl Vr� tl �Y
TYPICAL nNISH GRADING PLANS y •
V
A Planned CCrnn Gnity tr/ V:ca.:fard P:¢Ific Deva'.c, "nt Ir-,
1'T�.....�'7 to ��sl:,.,Y•r'�y%••�:s.lf• =.Y I �= `..,
( r
CONCEMAL CaAD1NC AND DRAINAGE PLAN
i 1
V
4, H.ltD1l'd corlMU(Illy by vkodlend P.;d"r. a-'+ IOPMCnr, im / ` t
•
C- s
A Panned Community by Woodland Pacific Devoloort•ent, Ina w
•
/]I
• it(
I
t �V14 1 t
a
l�l —'� ,r�' t FI �i�'1 "Y •sw�wen.r
t 3 4
�G7�1Cc� TUAl.. LAh{L'_L BL YLN4
ME L
A Planned Communitrr by Nk,odland Pacific Development, Inc.
J.[
ITv1 GX,'J1crT 'G~
LIT! or AMCHO COCQ:OXGA
INITIAL STUDY ,
PROJECT I:IFORIATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
rnviro. -ental Assessment Review Fee: $BO 00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form rust be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. URon receipt of this
application, the Enviranme ^tal Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study, Tho Development Reviev
Committee will melt and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at whach time the
project is to be heard. The Coc.:ittee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
enviicnae. tal impact and a Negative Ccclaration will be
filed, =, The project will have an anvironmental L-pact
and ao Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project. •
PROJECT TITLE: The Woods
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Woodland Pacific
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHO:.'E OF PERSON To DE C3KTACTED
CONCFRSI::G THIS PPDJEC:: above aid Peter Templeton, The Plannl
(714) 60.0 -4911 _ - -- - - - -
LOCITION OF PROJCCT (STREET ADDZSSS :. :'7 ASSESSOR PARCEL N).)
He:^OSa Avenue - florth Of H(Ilside (see at
LIST CT ::ER PEf';ITS -TCESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDEPAL AGE: :C,ES AND THE AGENCY TssuTxr. enry
I -1
C� r�
A PROJECT DESCRIPTION
0
LJ
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
JlfLits on 149 . 19. non ... ,
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAG7. OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, I£ ANY:
95.5 acre
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRO`,''2%TAr. SETTING Or THE PROJ -CT SITE
INCLUDING INFVR'_aTION ON TOPOGI.IPHY, PLi \TS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTI.'RAL, HISTORICAL Ok SCE:7IC ASPECTS, USE
Oi SURROV,,DING PR0P7RTIES, AND THE DESCRIp:IOY OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH L'ECESSARY SHEE:S):
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
Of cumulative actions, which although individually s.all,
may as a whole havn ..ignificant onvira=ental ir_,art2
no
_- 2
ATILT. TTITS PROjrC7:
YrS M
x 1. create a substantial change in ground
contOUls7
x 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibrataor.1
x 3. Create a substartial change in dosand for
municipal servieas (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)°
_x _ 4. Create charges in the existing zoning or
general plan deaigrations?
x _ 5. Remove any existing trees? He,, many.
._ _X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous metorials such as
toxic substances, fla.:..ablas or explosives?
EXPlanation of any YES answers above: (3) Tht
IMPORTA'rr: If the project involves the cons truetion of
residential units, cor_plete the form on the
next page.
E
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above end in the attached exhibits present the data and
inforcwt.on required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the °acts, statements, an6
information presented are true and correct to tno best of
my lnowledga slid belief. . further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evauuation can be Wda the DavalcuL%� Review committeeDato�I%r Si .i• �/
Title
I -3
0 RESIDE:' TrAL CONSTP.DCI0:1
Thu following infor .nation should be provided to the City of Pahcho Cucamonga
Plcnnine Tivlsion in order to aid in assessing the ability of the
schpol district to acccraodate the proposed residential development.
llaro of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Woodland Pacific Development Inc.
��j�
Spacific Lccaeion of Project: Hermosa Avenue, North of Hiilside
PHT,SD I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PunsE 4 TC:-L
1. Nt_ ber of single
fanili writs:
2. Nunez of multiple
ferlly waits:
3. Data pro =used to
• bap_- ccnstructiom:
4. roriids_ Gate of
cc=_.,
The development will have six phases as indicated
17e : ^l o on the phasing exhibit ConsUuction activities
and a of Tentativo will start approximately 120 Gays after recordation
S. net. -r -s Price aarca with each phase approximately 6 ranths apart.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING - THE MOODS
T0000raphy
Located at the base of the San Bernardino National Forest,
The Moods has a high elevation in the northeast corner of
2170 feet above , ^a level dropping to a low point along
ire southern boundary line of 19,;0 feet above sea level
(1920 within the drainage area) The overall giadient of
the site is 10%, with the slope running from north to
south
Running through the site in a northeast to southwest
direction is a natural drainage course. That portion of
the site west of the drainage area has a gradual sloping
condition toward the drainage areas. That portion east of
the drainage area, although also having a gradual change,
slopes easterly forming the western limits of the drainage
area (see attached USGS map).
Tne development concept for this project results in mini-
mal grading with grading only for streets, access, and
housing structure
yeoetations
Approximately 80% of the site Is densely planted with rt'
go-,' eucalyptus (Eucalyptus cemaldulensis) approximately
AS years old The densely planted cond tiotis of the site
rave not permitted the average tree diameter formation,
however, overall the trees are in good condition.
The limits of the densely planted conditions are shown on
the following exhibit As can be seen from this exhibit,
the groves du not exist on the most eastern and western
portions on the site
The •woods' clan will preserve the maxicium number of trees
Possibly restricting tree removal to that necessary for
streets, access, b•tilding envelope and fire station
Addit onally, those areas not now planted will have intro -
o•iced eacalynti s
R ipa., an habitat exist in the natural drainage areas of
the site and will be preserved In t•,e park area
Soils
The si,e 1105 in the northwestern portion Of the San
Bernardino valley In an area of gi anular alluvial Solis
Trese so Is, derived from the S. Gabriel Mountains, have
been oeposited to great deptns
•
r �
\� "rP'•e_c 4`
f•'��i,r�l���c -:�'N - -•J
1
�•liZ�.�� /'fy`� ,,\rah, ; F—•L,�
C�1 ^`1� {�•1�
Pit :.a i `v rr r'�� J -K"^` M{ IJJ�- f^'�f� --�.'. 1'3,
y/r j • ' J k N. 1 l��•, .�. � rs.,nr • t-� �� q!G l� �t.n
lq� FYI \r• r+K!i '�- ri'�'`i1 ��lW ^tom ^�� -_wM.- `-
,� U•, �, 1 ; /I DIN
SAN •OCR. �r
NAIISONAi'�oOE57
!!i a :ter`_ t .'•.o�,., i
�, 27 a
Do
P � - � • �'!----`lr-
�5 _ -�-�•
•I Y �• 1 i• _ '' lbw —� /� •
• ` !
J
I
u HE WOODS 937 RA CHO CUUMONGM M E S
A Planned Community by Woodland Pacific Development, Inc. =}�
0!)
Soils in this area are part of the Tujunga- Soboba Associa-
tion A soil association is a lai,dscape that has a dis-
!' tinctiv0 proportional pattern of soils Specifically,
these soils are of the Soboba gravelly, loamy sand series
(50C), are nearly level to mooerately sloping, and are
excessively
erosion hazard aise slight, loand on the these
esgree of s limitation lfor
septic tank absorption fields is also slight
Test holes encountered surface layers of light brown to
dark yellow -brown silty sands with gravel, cobbles, and
boulders underlain by dark grey -brown sands with gravel,
cobbles, and boulders, or red -brown very silty sands with
gravel, cobbles, and boulders, which are further underlain
by light Drown sandy gravels with cobbles and boulders to
the maximum Depth penetrated.
A full soils engineering report prepared by Richard Hills
Associates, Inc., 9223 -C Archibald Avenue; Rancho
Cucamonga, study did (not )indicate that ssoilsl wound beoa
urin
problem dg this development of the site provided
guidelines are followed
Seismicity
The Moods is located largely on the northwest extremity of
• the Deer Canyor alluvial fan in the upper San Bernardino
Valley.
The northmost portion of the property extends locally into
the foothills Of the San Gabriel Mountains and is tran-
StudiesbZoneehas Cucamonga
est established fault. for this Bedrock
exposures r are limited to the foothills area north of the
fault.
L]
The potentially active Cucamonga fault cuts across the
northern part of the property It is typically a thrust
fault striking 1160 -SIL and dipping from zero to 19 degrees
north. Significant local varla' tons in strike and dip
suggect an uneven thrust plane The southerly dip has
been noted in adjacent areas along the Cucamonga fault.
It may represent a •tectonic - slide- feature: the movement
of the edge of the thrust plate downslope across the land
surface During repeated fault movement
The maalmun credible earthquake magnitude for the
Cucamonga fault, and for other active or potentially
act Ive faults that slioulJ be considered in design are
listed below
/'J /
Comprehensive Storm Drain Project No 2 (CSDP2), System
No 3, is Intended to serve the area Construction of the
Corps of Engineers' Hillside Basin and Channel are re-
Proposed before the CSDP2 system can function adequately as
proposed
Approximately 750 acres, offSfte, draln to and across the
Site Of these, about 484 acres will be Intercept "d by
which Hillside Basin and Channel System, COnstructiCA Of
1982 Currently scneduled to Commence in the spring of
Development of the site prior to 1982 must allow
for in- possibility of flows from the approximately 390
acres of drainage from Hillside Creek as nell as the
approximately 94 acres east of the Hillside Lreek dra In the
boundary and north of [he proposed Hillside Creek
connection rw:th 9them improovementoof the
Hermosa Avenue,uj�ed in
from north to Clip, a 48" Corrugatre hetal
Pipe (CMP) , two 24 CFIP and a doub ie 6' 3,
Reinforced
espective cap acitlesexassumfnt (RCB
(Plate 4) Their
entrance before Overflow ontc theestreet. a 100 ft the
cfs, 25 cfS and 290 cfs Mith the exception of C s, 40
CMP, these Capacities are adequate for the the 48"
Charges Required Capacfcy for the 48" 10 -year dts-
Capicity of the double 6' x 3' RCB is is o handle
the 100 -year discharge once the Corps Buff lciet t
' Hillside Basin and
Channel Improvements are completed.
In addition to the improvements listed aDovQ, a County Channel bounds large natural channel traverses a it rneart th!n the linen, a
a large channel, part of the west line and
system, runs north to south near earl ieastwa'er spreading
This latter channel serves abe_•t 8.5 acres Of rty line
easterly part of the property. Its tributar the most
practically eliminated by construction O7 the area will be
act Corps proj-
The complete drainage report is available from Associated
repin ears, 316 East "E" Street; Ontario, CA 91764 This
report details the improvement that will accompany OevCl-
opment.
Existing OeJ velopmt
Existing development on -Site is limited to Hermosa Avenue,
S concrete road reaervdlr In north southwest portion, d forest
service road along the nopat property l,nQ, several on_
Paved internal Thais and paths and small borzon pits on
usesthe northwest The Site ut 111tat ion map filed as part of
this application graphically describes surrounding land
0
•
0
Distance to Magnitude Maximum
Site (fit,) Crediblel
Sal Andreas 10 8 5
San ,.acinto 7,5 7.5
6hlttier 20 7 5
Cucamonga On -Site 6.5 -7 0
A full seismicity report is available from Richard Hills
Associated, Inc., 9223
-C Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cuca-
r1n9a, CA 91,30; (714) 989 -1751, upon
request. said
Investigati,m Indicates that the site is considered feas-
ible
for development within the limitation and require-
ments contai•ied within the seismicity
investigation,
Groundwater
Small seeps representing local groundwater occurrences
concentrated i,y the cla:, faultgouge
were noted In the
northwest portion, but were not fn evidence On the exist-
ing ground surface
min sprin
tabo.at gi130 ifeet than gal/
notedd north- northeastd of the
northeast property corner.
Water fron this spring was not
In ev Idence on toe site.
Surface water Hewing at an estimated rate of 1 gal. /min
disappeared into the alluvium (Vdl) at
the existing sub-
located located approximately 325 feet northeasterly of the
Hermosa
Avenue Cul -de -sac.
r
The Seismic Refraction Survey suggests a Possible isolated
groundwater table at depths
of 45 -75 feeta along
Lines 3.
Orainage Analysis
'r
The Woods Is bounded on the north by the Los Angeles
Department Of Water
,t
and Power Transmission line right-of-
way and the south by a ccunty
hi
roadway,
•
A drainage review of the site was madc by the County Flood
Control District
,5
tnP late 1960's and the Information is
contained in their file 106 0302
A drainaoe study made
for this report yield: results consistent with District's
s
i�
DATE: 7I/ I "; -L7/
CITY OF RANCHO GUCAl10NCA
PARI 11 - INITIAL STUDY
E - 1ROATI ME, CHECKLIST
I. E::VTRO:MEVTAL THPACTS
(Explanation of •11 "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
sheets).
C,L/
•
0
9,
YES MAYBE NO
1. Soils and Cloay. 4111 the proposal have
sign iii eaneo
t zosulto In:
a Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
geologic relationships?
/
.1!
b. Disruptions, dlsplaremenis, compaction or
burial of the soil?
�c
c. Change in topography or ground surface
contour intervals?
d The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features?
a Any potential Increase In wind or water
erosion of nails, affecting aithor on or off
site conditons?
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
g. Expos -c of people or property to brnlo is
hararus such as earthquakes, landslidos, mud-
/
slides, ground failure, or similar ha :ards?
\/
h An increase in the rate c nx[rac uon and /or
_
O
use o[ ary mineral resource?
2, livdrolorv. 4111 the proposal have significant
results in:
C,L/
•
0
9,
,l
YES MAYBE NO
a
a Changes in currents, or the course of direction
of flowing streams, rivers, or or- moral stream
chaanals?
_— y
b. Changes in absorption races, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water
runotCt
_ / —
c Alterations to the course or flow of flood
watersi
d. Change in the amount of surface water In any
body of water?
�C
e. Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration of surface water quality?
f Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters,
either through direct additions or with.
-
dravals, or through Interference with an
anuifer7
Quality?
Quantity?
h. The reduction In the amount water other-
vailabl
vise available for public water supplies?
to
--
I. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as floodirg or selches?
1. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant
results In:
a. Constant or periodic air emissions fro. mrbUa
or indirect sources?
,/
`
Stationary sourcesources--
-
b Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
with the attainment of applicable
air quality
air quality standards?
—
c Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or ter,perat ,raj
/
✓
d, Biota
Flora. Will the proposal have significant reaulto
a Chango In the charaetoristicz of species,
including dlvers![y, dis[rlbu[lon, or nuabor
of any species of plants?
T
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?7�
V
,y
YES 7L,YBE RO
e. Introduction of new or disruptive species of —
plant into as area?
d. Reduction in the potential for ogrlcultural /
production?
;e l
Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results
In:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including dlvarsitys distribution, or numbers
Of any at sties of animals?
Is Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
/
or endangered species of aaimis7
e. Introduction of new or disruptive ara of
m s laa
animals Into as area, or reau'.t Sa a barzlsr
to the migration or movement of animals?
✓//
—
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
_✓
5 Population. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal alter On location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of
the human population of an area?
_
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
/
create a lemnd for additional hausing?
6. Soclo- Econo*Ac Factors. Will the proposal have
significant results Sn:
a. Change in local or regiansl aoclo- economic
characteristics, Set .udinp economic or
commercial diversity, tax rat., and property
values?
is Will Project costr be equitably distributed
among Project benofictarios, S.e , buyers,
or
[ax payers o[ pro'eet users?
7. Land Use and Planntnv Constderationn. Will the
T-1.1 have eignlf cane results 'nt
a. A substantial alteration of tha present or
/
Planned land us& of an area?
b. A conflict wit's any d.signationa, obs ectives,
Policies or adopted plans of any governmental
entities
v
e. An Impact up:m the qulalty or quantity of
existing consumptive or non - consumptive
recreational opportunities?
/
)
CC
-- i/
•
71
ale S
YES )LtYBE NO
8 Tranaportatior. Will the proposal have significant
. results fn:
a. Cenerptloa of substantial additional vehicular
c, movement?
b Effects oa existing street., or demand fcr
new street construction? _
e Effects on existing parking facilities, of _
dam Pr •r maw parking?
d Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems)
a Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and /or gcads?
f. Alterations to or effects on prevent and
potential water -borne, rail, mass transit cr
air traffic?
g. Increases in crifiic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
9 Cultural Resources. Will the proposal hs%e
slz;niticant resultp in:
a A cisturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
paleontological, and /or historical resources? t/
10 Head Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the
proposal have significant results in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
b. Exposure of people to potentia hea)th hazards?
c. A risk ce explosion en release an of hazardous -- /
i substances in the event of an accident?
d. An increase In the number of individuals
y, or species of vector or pathenohen Lc
organisms or the exposure of people to such /
+" organisms?
r e. Increase in existing noise levels?
fE `. Exposure of people to potentially a mgcrous /
nolsa levels? ✓ /
S. The creation of obl_ctionable odors?
m'Y Ih. An increase in light or Clare?
A) 7
Male
:mew i
YES MAYBE NO
11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant
results !n:
•
a The obstruction or degradation of any scenic
/
Vista or View?
— ✓
b. The creation of on aesthetically offensive
site?
✓
C. A conflict with the objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors?
_
12. Utll hies end Public Services. Will the proposal
hAV@ 6 signific3 recd for new syste or
alterations to the following:
a. Electric power?
b Natur l or packaged gas?
C. Ummanicatiocs syst,as?
d Water supply?
e Wastewater facilities?
f Flood control structures?
g Solid waste facilities?
h Fire protection?
V
1 Police protection?
✓
J. Schools?
k. Parks or other recreational facilities?
1. Maintenance of public facilities. Including
roads and flood control facilities?
m. Other governmental services?
f
13. Enerey and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal
Zignificanr
have results !n:
a. Use of substantial or =ccssive fuel or energy?
b. Substantial Increase in deyand upon existing
sources of enorgy?
e An increase In efio Demand for development of
new sources of energy?
d. An !nerease or perpetuation of the consumption
of non - renewable focus of energy, when feasible
renewable sources of anergy are available?
—
A
a�
z
YES MAYBE YO
c S.Ibstantial depletion of any nourenewable or
/
scarco "rural resource?
14 Handato,v Flndlnaa of SSRnf fieanca.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment. substantially
reduce tee habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish •+r wildlife population to drop
below self susta.ning levels, threaten to
elimina.e a ?lane or animal coca nlry, reduce
the number or restrict the raege of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important txa_ -plc: of the valor periods of
/
California history or prehistory?
_-
b Does the project have the potential to achieve
e.hort -tem, to the disadvantage of long -term,
environmental goals? (A short -tern impact on the
enviroment to one which occurs In a relatively
britf, definitive period of time while long-
rem impacts w U1 andure well into the future)
c. Does the project have Impacts which are
Individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
S)
means that the incremental effects of an
individual are
project considerable when vfeved
In connection with the effects of past projects,
/
probable
and probable e future projects).
--
d Deep the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human befogs, either directly or indirectly'
II DIScl,ssrON OF EYVIRO.*MWAL EVALUATION (i.e , of affirmative answers to
Cho above questions ylun a discussi, of Proposed mitigation
mem6re).
, i o_t6l1.S Q'l tiv —�
A
a�
z
III DLTF UNINATION
Cn the basis of this initial evaluation:
OI find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project eonld have a bignificant
Ueffect on the environment, there viii not be a significant effect
In this case because the mitigation measures described on ..n
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project ?LAY have a significant effect on the
enviyrmcnyt, and an ENVIR0.%,?1 T IMPACT REPORT is required
Date M3 I 0
Tit e —
t►
f .�
�
C
:4
0• ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11933
:xplanatioii of "yes" and "maybe" answers:
Soils and G"oloar
(c) The applicant intends to maintain the existing natural grade
wherever possible. This is to be accomplished by grading only for streets,
access, ano the building footprint.
(e) d (f) The gradinq and drainage plan indicates that a nutter
of lots will drain into the existing natural drainage courses. Construction
on this site will increase the amount of surface ,ater runoff, therefcre, in-
crease the volume of water in these natural drainage _ourses which could re-
sult in water erosion of soils affecting off -site coiditions. No improvements
to the drainage courses on -site or off -site are proposeo, other than culverts
under the street
(o) The northern most portion of the property is trarsected by the
Cucaronna Fault An Alquist - Priolo special study zone has been established
for this fault The maximum magnitude of an earthquake on the Cucamonga
Fault at thls location is projected at 6 5 to 7 on the Richter Scale, there-
fore cnuld exmnse people or property to potentially significant geologic
hazards
• 2 Hydroloor
(b) Construction will increase the area covered by buildings and
vdved areas which will reduce rain and flood water absorntion rates and
will increase the amount of surface water runoff
(i) Development of the site cnuld concentrate runoff water, particularly
In the existing natural drainane courses, which could result in potentially
significant 'looding hazards both on -site and off -site.
4. Flora
(a) d (b) The project site is commonly knoaaa as the 4- rmosa Groves, and approx-
imately 80% of the site is densely planted nitN red Gum Eucalyptus approximately
65 years old The uroPOaed 4cvclovment has been designed to restrict tree re-
euval to the minimum necessary for streets, access, building envelope, and fire
Protection The most western and eastern portions of the project site are out-
side the grove and are proposed to be planted with Eucalyptus. A Tree Removal
Permit would be reeul.ed from the City of Rancho Cucamonga for those trees meeting
the size criteria of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, which are protected by same.
Fauna
(a) The development of this site for human habitation will have an
effect on the diversity, distribution, and numbers of species of animals
10 inhabiting the site.
'll ,
Addendum to Environmental Checkllst for TT 11933 -2-
5 Population
(a) The project site is designated a oark site in the General Plan
'or the City of Rancho Cucamonga ar. has a land use density of just under
2 dwelling units per acre. However, to preserve a 14.6 acre park along
the western portion of the site, 149 of the lots are proposed to be rn the
12,000 square foot range The surrounding properties are designated very
low (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) residential on the General Plan
end are presently zoned R- 1- 20,000. Therefore, the project will alter
he density and growth rate of the human population in this area.
7. -Land Use and Planning Considerations
(a) d ib) The Pr -Jett site is designated as a park in the City's General
Plan, ano the proposed development includes a 14.6 acre park Comiuting
the dwellirg unit density based upon excluding the 14.6 acre nark to" the pro-
ject site results in a density of 2 3 dwelling units per acre, which 1s
in confl'ct with the very low residential density established by the
General Pldn for this area of Alta Loma.
8. Transportation
(a), (b) b (d) This project will generate increased vehicular traffic .1
volunas which will effect existing streets ano require new ,treet con-
struction and potentially impact existing transportation systems.
(g) The proposed development will result in an increase in the population
for the area and associated vehicular traffic. The 14 6 acre park shown
an the development plans does not indicate off- street parking facilities.
Both of these factors could potentially result in traffic hazords to
motor vehicles, pedestrians, or bicyclists.
10 Health, i.,fety, and Nuisance Factors
(e) Inca tse in noise levels resulting from this project will be pri-
marily due to ircreased vehicular traffic and normal human activities in a
residenti.rl area Noise revels will temporarily increase during construction
11 Aes *hetics
(b) This site, commonly known as the Hermosa Grove, is recognized as a
significart natural resource for the City of Rancho, Cucamonga and the develop-
ment of the sits could result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site.
12 Utilities and Public Services
The construction of this project may require extensions or modifi-
cations in some or all of the utilities and public services noted in the Environ.
mental Checklist. The most significant impacts would be upon fire protection
services.
n
Addendum to Environmental checklist for TT 11993 -3-
14. Mandatory Findings of significance
(a) The development of this project may I1ave the potential to degrade
the Quality of the environment
(d) This project may have environmental effects which may cause sub-
stantial adverse affects on human beings, either directly or indirectly
1!)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 19, 1982
TO. City Council ana City Manager
FRGm -loyd B Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT Industrial Assessment District 82 -1
Attached
of Assessment CDistrict 82 - -lal These eResolutIonsu are rsummarized tinithefattached
letter from Mackenzie Brown Briefly this aeries cf actions will accomplish
the following
- Preliminary approval of the benefit spread as outlined in the Engineer's
Report
- Set the date for Public Hearing on District formation for July 21, 1982
- Direct notification of preliminary assessments
- Authorize bidc for the construction contract
- Order public hearing on Eminent Domain procedures 'or severa, parcels to
be condemned
None of the actiots ordered will establish the District These only allow the
proj;ct to �e taken to the final step In a complete form.
As has `een preciously discussed, from this point all property owners will
be notified of current estimated assessmants and information meetings will be
-choduled to answer any questions about the spread method, design of the
roJect or the mechanics of the District formation.
On July 21 the Council will hear all formal protests and at that time will have
the option of ordering District formation and awarding of contracts. The
schedule of key dates leading to the final hearing is attached
This memo should be supplemented by the more detailed mars of April 28, 1982,
for specifics of the District formation I will 3750 be contacting each of
you before the meeting to review proposed actions and answer any further
questions on the District
Presentation
Mackenzie Crown, tBond Council iandbouraFinancialMConsultantsnwill Mbel there to
answer any questions in the Band sale
RECOMIENDATION:
It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached R solutions as summarized
in the order of procedure and set the public hearing for forwdtlon of
Assessment District 82 -1 for July 21, 1982
Res tied,
LB :b
is
/j e;
STAFF REPORTS.
INDUSTRIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1
Authorization to proceed w,th Assessment District 82 -1 It is recommended
that the council approve p-elimir,ary engineer's report, authorize
advertisement for construction and bond bids, and set the public tearing
date of July 21, 1982 on Assessment District 82 -1.
Assessment District 82 -1 (formerly 79 -1, will cunstruct major street
and storm drain facilities in the industrial area south of Arrow Route
between the Devore freeway and Deer Creek.
Rt`- GLUTION 10 82-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA,
DESIGNATING PERSONS TO PERFORM VARIOUS DUTIES FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS
AND RESCINDING PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
RESOLUTION NO. 82-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING THE GENERAL NATURE AND LOCATION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC
WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND SHOWING THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE ASSESSMENT
DISTIRCT TO BE ASSESSED FOR SAID IMPROVEMENT
RESOLLTION NO 82-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
COVERING PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION AND ORDERING THE PREFAPATION OF A REPORT
ON SAID IMPROVEMENT
RESOLUTION NO 82-
A RESOLUTION OF THE -'TY COUhCIL OF THE CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA,
AOPROVING A REPORT UNDER THE 'SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION
AND MAJORITY PiOJECT ACT OF 1931', AND FIXING A DATE OF HEARING THEREON.
RESOLUTION NO 82-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI7Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CE "TAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOGETHER
WITH APPURTENANCES IN A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS
OF THE "MUUILIPAL IIIPROVEMEIIT ACT OF 1913 ": DECLARING THE WORK TO BE OF MORE THAN
LOCAL OR ORD!NIKY BENEFIT; DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE
COSTS AND EXPEhSES THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS.
RESOLUTION NO 82-
0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IWE C Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
PASSING ON THE REPORT OF THE ENGINEER, C -PING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING
A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
RESOLUTION NO. 82-
A RESOLUTION OF THE LITY COUNCIL OF TkE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
REFERENCING PREVAILING WAGE SCALE AND OIRECTIIIG CALL FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS
i
nti# .
RESOLTUION NO. 82-
„ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA
SETTING TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC NEARING ON ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY TO ORDER ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS.
To
11
n
LJ
I
uw o.ncts oa
BROWN 8 NAZAREK
ur +a a uc..' un c...us on.a suns uo
IRVINE GUORNIA e113 ..0 o .w....I. .o .an ur..rn
or•i .a. -oaae
mar. -. ,.uo.n a... raa ••a. s.w oimo owi rsaooao
..... w�.uama n,.r as sos
a•oa..
. ..aa.
...wawa... a..w..row
May 11, 1982
Lloyd C Hubbs
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
RE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1
(rormerly Assessment District No 79 -1)
Dear Lloyd:
Enclosed herein please find the followtng
ORDER OF PROCEDURE: Sets forth the order of procedure for adoption of
eso utJons an presentation for meeting of May 19, 1982.
RETION DESIGNATING PERSONS: Formal appointment of Superintendent of
LreetSOLUs, newspaper, etc
RESOLUTION ADOP'ING PROPOSED BOUNDARY 11AP Action e,tablishing boundaries of
—Ss essmenL riCt.
RESOLUTION COVERING PRELIMINARY OE TERMINATION: This is the basic•
un seictiona eso ution under t e e c tmrt
RESOLUTION APPROVING REPORT AND SETTING HEARING Sets the public hearing for
tale lst ay o u y,
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. Jurisdic..inal Resolution for •1913 Act' proceedings
wit • t• n s.
RESOLUT1014 PASSING ON REPORT AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary approval
o naineer s eport set ing pu is Baring.
RESOLUTION REFERENCING WAGE SCALE AND CALLING FOR BIDS: Formal action
du ortztng i ing on the iorAS o improvemen .
RESOLUTION SETTING HEARING ON EMINENT DOPAIN PROCEEDINGS: This public be,.r ing
15 also SC he U e or It y ,
I
Uw p,-cc• Or
BROWN B NAZAREK
Lloyd C. Hubbs
City of Rancho Cucamonga .
May 11, 1992
i'aoe Two
The ORDER OF PROCEDURE as enclosed herein sets forth the Presentation before
the City Council and said ORDER OP PROCEDURE will also be Celpful In the
preparation of the Minutes.
As soon as they are available. I would appreciate receiving conformed copies of
all Resolutions, together with a copy of the minutes of the meeting where the
Resolutions nave been adopted
You will be receiving, uc.der separate cover, all Notices, Instructions and
Certificates when notice must be given after aooption of the Resolutions.
As written protests are filed against the proceedings, I would appreciate
copies being transmitted to this office for review.
The date for the receipt of bids on construction will allow ample time for all
modifications and amendments to be mad: w the Engineer's Report and Assessment
Roll prior to the time scheduled for the public hearing.
Please be advised that at the pl•blic hearing, depending on the results of the
bidding on the works of improvement, the assessmerts can be lowered, but if for
any reason any assessment needs to be Increased, further mailed notices will be go
required
On file now In the Office of the City Clerk should be the following:
1 Proposed Boundary Map;
2 Engineer's Report, including
a Plans
b specifications
C. Cost Estimates
d. Assessment loll
e. Assessment D'agram.
3 Map showing easements and rights -of -way to be acquired
Upon your -eview of the enclosed material, if you have any questions, torments
or suggestions, please call.
Very truly yours,
Ar,
F. PACKEH2IE BROWN
FMB:bd
encls
cc: %,crhi Authelet, City Clerk
i
►r f
I
}
n
Y!
.1
ORDER OR PROCEOtORE
-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAnn,"
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82.1
(FCRMERLY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 79 -1)
DATE IF MEETING:
ILSY 19. 1982
STAFF:
General P'""tetiCh IS to bownda,tes of
A$Snseent District utl Want Of woraS of
IeOrwemeat
CITY CDAACIL:
Adopt RESOLUTION DESIGNATING PERSONS TO PERFORM
DUTIES: Faml appolntspt Of Ss,�eringacnt of
Sheets aa0 "Mad er For legal pwbllcats", end
Foreel retclltlon of prior Proceedings for
y
Assns"nt District No. 79.1
CITi COUNCIL:
Adopt RESOLUTION ADOPTING PROPOSES 70UTDWT MP:
Fonel ettlan apwwlme bl.dartn cf Propped
Asseswat District
..,,.... _ .
CITY COLNICIL:
Adopt RESOLUTION COVERING PRELIMIRLAT
DETEL41MTIGR: The Intr,4xtary Rnolutloe
•
m0r the •1931 Act'
STAFF:
Present 'Debt Report- pursuant to the orwlslaM
Of the 'Special Attestant l0eestllalaa,
Malta NOM And Majority Protnt Act of 7931•.
CITY COUNCIL:
Adopt RESOLUTION APPgOYING RUORT AM SETTING
PUBLIC MEANING: Sets Ne pNGltt hearing NO the
•1931 Act-
City COUNCIL:
Adopt RESOLUTION OF INTENTION- 41- isdicttcnal
Resolution under •1913 Act, procerd,gt.
-
decl"'Aq Intent to order teprweatnts aced hwe
bobs (•ISIS Act•)
STAFF:
Pre. tt Otto+ of EnaNnr -s - Report- Mluant So
the PwlttaM Of - memcNpal Iepraeevent An Or
1903•, consisting Of the following;
1. Fleas;
2. Specifications:
3. Cwt Estmta:
e, Aswi,eent Roll:
S. Assessment 0349rr;
6. r!t'rtptlaa Of I'Matt to be ac Paired.
CITY COUNCIL:
Aa.gt RESOLUTION fASSIK ON REPORT MO SETTING
PUBLIC M'R:NG: Sets p.b11C hvd11 •1913
.oN
Act* Ing Nees Report
CITY COVICIL:
Adopt RESOLUTION REF( RENCIMG IRtGE SCALE AND
CALLIN4 FOR 8105 (O+ISTAUCIIOM): FeNe•I action
"tW tang bidding W the worse. of 1vYwerat
•
STAFF:
bneelatmn of e0 Moving •nMentl eta
rlgllt <f..q It t'I l0 to COutred.
CITY WWII;
Adopt RESOLUTION SETTING MEANING 01 EFINENt
00,1101 PROCEEOI►S: Set, heertrq on acet,ty -
l0 Order coademeation for eaeei ett aeteslery to
actoaplish led tssYweeeelt.
j
.1
1
OR10 OF PROCEMAE
CITY %V BAMC10 CUCARP)NIA
ASSESSQA' DIsnic1 to. BC -1
(FOUVALT ASSETALAT DISTRICT AU. 79 -1)
OA6L TWO
PROPOSFJ SCMLSAI.
PAY 19, 1962: ADOPT "ISDIIT. •At RESOLUTIONS AND AUTHORIZE
SIOC1110 ON MISS If UAPROYEAEAT
.Pat 16, 1972: 10HOR.K SA.E OF 60505
JULY 7. 1962: DATE FOR ACCENT OF WASTRUCTIOIL BIOS
JULY 15. w: ASCEIYE 3105 F01 BONDS
JULY 21, 1962: PDA IC REAR ;NOS TO OMAICEA:
w_.
al
O c �
'1921 ACT' T;
1913 ACY• %Ws
CONFIRM ASSE59
n'FCE55i fr FA COAD [NHI7iO PROCEllS
.
0
RESOLUTION NO. ^ , -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DESIGNATING
PERSONS TO PERFORM VARIOUS DUTIES FOR
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS AND RESCINDING
PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the Ci7Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
(hereinafter referred to as 'Agenc,�) is considering .hE fomation of a special
assessment district, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 19130, being Division .2 of the Streets ,.,d Highways Code of
the State of California, for the construction of ertain public works of
Improvement, together with appurtenances and aprorteuant work, said special
assessment district to be known and designated a.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO 82 -1
(hereinafter referred to as the 'Assessment District'); and,
WHEREAS, at this time. Agency is desirous of making the e;,.ired appointments
and designating persons to perform certain duties, it 'der •o allow the
proceedings to go forward to completion in a cordance it, the provisions of
law
O NOW, THEREFORE, iT iS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the abcve recitals are all true and correct
SECTION 2 That LLOYD B. HUBBS is hereby appointed to perform all of the
duties and functions of the Superintendent of Streets as said
duties are specified and designated in the 'Municipal Improvement
Act of 19134, being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California, for the above referenced Assessment
District.
SECTION 3. That the place for recordation of the assessment roll and diagram
shall he In the Office of the Supe ^lntendent of Streets, and said
assessment roil and diagram, upon recordation, shall be kept as a
permanent record of the Agency.
SECTION 4 That the GAILY REPORT is hereby designated as the newspaper for all
publicatinns as required by law and as necessary for completion of
this Assessment District.
SECTION S. That F. HACKFNIIE BROWN (BROWN A NAZAREK, AliORNEYS AT LAW) is
hereby appointed to act as Bond Counse' for the purposes of
p•eparinq proceedings and issuing in ungralffied opinion attesting
Ob to the validity of the proceedings and the enforceability of the
bonds
71
M
SECTION S. That FiELIAIAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES, 11IANCIAL CONSULTANTS, is
hereby appointed as the person to obtain a proposal or bid for the
sale of bonds to be issued in order to finance said proceedings,
and said bonds ar: to be issued pursuant to the terms and
provisions of the 'improvement Bond Act of 19150, being Division 10
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
SECTION 6. That all prior proceedings relating to Assessment District la.
79 -1, said proceedings having been taken pursuant to the "Special
Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of
19310 (Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, are hereby rescinded and all Ror_edings shalt now be
reinitiated for a new Assessment District known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ _ day of , 1982
FRy --
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
0
• RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING
A M4P SHOWING THE GENERAL NATURE AND
LOCATION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS OF
IMPROVEMENT AND 910WiNG THE PROPOSED
BDUNDARIES OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
TO BE ASSESSED FOP. SAID IMPROVEMENT
c
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
(hereinafter referred to as •Aaercy), has been presented and has received a
map showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed improvement
work, and also designating and describing the boundaries of the area proposed
to be assessed in an assessment disc ict under the provisions and authority of
the "Municipal Improvement Act of 19130, being Division 12 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California; said assessment district known and
designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1
(hereinafter referred to as the -Assessment District -)
NOW, THEREFORE, ET IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct
SECTION 2 That a map of the Assessment District showing the general nature,
location and extent 3f the proposed public Improvement work, and
also showing the boundaries of the proposed Assessment District and
lands and property to be assessed to pay the Costs and expenses of
the proposed improvements designated as
*PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ND. 82 -1•
is hereby submitted, and the same is hereby approved and adopted.
SECTION 3 That the original map of said proposed boundaries of the proposed _
Assessment District and one copy thereof is to be filed in the
Office of the City Clerk of Agency.
SECTION 4 A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one
copy of the map of the Assessment District, evidencing the date and
adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the
adoption of the Resolution fixing the tlm2 and place of hearing on
the formation or extent of said Assessment District, a copy of said
map shall be filed with the corre:t and proper endorsements thereon
with the County Recorder, all In the manner and form provided for
in Section 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California
i i
t
M
SECTION S. That said proceedings are proposed tY be financed thrduqh bonds to
be Issued pursuant to the terms aim vovisiont of the 'Improvement
Bond Act of 1915•, being Division 10 of the -Streets and Highways
Code of the Stale of California.
SECTION 6. Tlat this legislative body hereby estfmlishes a special fund
designated by the rase and number of the Assessment Oistr' ', and
Into said fund shall be placed all proceeds from the sole s bond:
and cash co'iections. In order to ezjedite the improvements or
acquisition under these proceedings and as authorized b� aw, funds
from any available source may be transferred into special
fund. Any funds transferred are a Irian to the fund shall be
repaid out of the proceeds of the sr.le of bonds, al required
and authorized by law, and specifically Section 10210 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the Str.te of California.
APPROVEn and ADOPTED this _ day of _ 1982.
F9Ctf
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40NGA
STATE Y CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
CITY CLEAK •
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
• RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL COVERING
PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION AND ORDERING
THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT ON SAID
IMPROVEMENT.
NHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
(hereinafter referred to as •Agency), is contemplating the construction of
certain public vorks of improvement under proceedings condu.ted pursuant tr the
"Municipal Improvement Act of 19130, being Division 12 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California, in a special assessmert district
known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 92 -1
(hereinafter referred to as the 'Assessment District').
NOM. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTI071 I That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2 That certain public works of improvement, together with
appurtenances and appurtenant work, including acquisition there
• necessary, are proposed to be done and made within the boundaries
of the Assessment District. In connection therewith, this Agency
finds and determines as follows:
A. That the specific nature of the proposed works of improvement
consists of all the work as shown on the pr000sed boundary map,
as previously approved for this Assessment District
B. That the boundaries of the Assessment District and the lands
and properties within the Assessment District proposed to be
assessed to pay the costs and expenses of said proposed works
of improvement are as shown upon a map of the Assessment
District, which map has been heretofore approved by Agency and
Is on file In the Office of said Agency. Said map shall govern
for all retails as to the extent of the Assessment District.
SECTION 3 That the statute under which it is proposed to conduct proceedings
is the 'Municipal Improvement Act of 1913', being Division 12 of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, with
bonds proposed to be issued as authorized by the 'improvement Bond
Act of 19150, being Division 10 of said Code.
SECTION a That this proposed improvement is referred to the appointed
SUPERINTENDENT OF STRrETS, who is hereby appointed to procure all
necessary Information to prepare a report on the proposed
improvement in the manner and form provided for in Division < of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, the
a 'Spec,.il Assessment investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest
Art of 1931'
� r
SECTION S. That this Resol -itior vnd the Report as ordered herein are pursuant
to the provisions o! said Division 4. i
SECTION G. That said Report, pursuant to Division 4, shall have attached to it
a copy of this Resol nion upon its adoption
SECTION 7. That the works v' improvement as m•oposed to be constructed under
these proceedings, generally consist of the following,
The construction of certain st,eet improvements,
including grading, clearing and grubbing, pavinn,
base and storm drain improvements, together with
all appurtenances, including acquisition of rights -
of -way where necessary, to serve aid benefit pro-
perties within the boundaries of ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. 82 -1.
SECTION D. That this legislative body does, at this time, intend to ms1:e a
contribution towards certain of the costs and expenses of the works
of improvement, as proposed under these proceedings For
particulars, reference is made to the "Report" as filed pursuant to
Division 4 of he Streets and Highways Code, a copy of which will
be on file with the transcript of these proceedings and Wen .o
public Inspection
APPROVED and ADOPTED this ` day of 1982. •
ATTEST:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
P1''r5_
CITY If RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
1:!
0
RESOLUTION NO. _
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING
A REPORT UNDER 14E •SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND MAJORITY
PROTEST ACT OF 1931% AND FIXING A DATE
OF HEARING THEREON.
WHFgEAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.4, CALIFORNIP
( he,einafter referred to as *Agency"), has by Resolution ordered the
preparation of a *Report" under tke provisions of the "Special Assessment
Investigation, Limitation end Majority Protest Act of 19310, being Division 4
of the Streets and Highw Code of the State of Califcrnia, relating to the
construction of certain public works of improvement in a special assessment
district known and designated a
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 62 -1
(hereinafter referred to as the 'Assessment District'); said works of
improvement generally described as folloirs:
The construction of certain street improvements,
including grading, clearing and grubbinq, paving,
base and storm drain improvements, together with
all appurtenan,es, including acquisition of �ights-
of -way where reressary, to serve and benefit pro-
perties within the boundaries of ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO 82 -1.
and,
WHEREAS, such "Report* has been prepared and submitted to Agency.
NOW, ToCREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I That the above recitals are true and correct
SECTION 2. That the 'Report' so prepared and presented be, and the sane is
approved, and the fact and date of this approval shall be endorsed
thereon and the •Report• shall be filed In the Office of Agency.
SECTION 3. THAT THIS AGENCY DOES HEREBY FIX THE 21ST (UY OF JULY, 1982, AT THE
HOUR OF 7:30 O'CLOCK P.M , AT THE SPECIAL MEETING PLACE OF AGENCY,
BEING THE LiON COtt4UNITY CENTER, 9161 BASELINE ROAD, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AS THE TIME AND PLACE WHEN A HEARING ON SAID
"REPORT" SHALL BE HFLO BY AGENCY. THE CITY CLERK SHALL GIVE NOTICE
OF SUCH HEARING BY MAILING A COPY OF THE NOTICE, POSTAGE PREPAID,
TO ALL PERSONS OWNING REAL PROPERTY WHICH 1S PROPOSED TO BE
ASSESSED TO PAY ANY PART OF THE COST OF THE WORK, WHOSE NAMES AVID
ADDRESSES A2PEAR ON THE LAST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLL AVAILABLE ON
THE [LATE THE 'REPORT• WAS COMMENCED, AT THE ADDRESS AS SHOWN ON
SUCH ROLL, OR AS KNOWN Tn AGENCY, ALL IN THE MANNER AID FORM AS
PROVIDED FOR IN SA:O DIVISION 4 OF THE STREETS AID HIGHWAYS CODE OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I -
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1982.
•
ATTEST•
CITY OF RANC1 0 CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
MAYOR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF LALIFORNIA
0
0
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL DECLARING INTENTION
TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPRGVEMENTS
TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES IN A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT PURSUANT TD THE PROVISiONS OF THE •MUNICIPAL
IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913 "; DECLARING THE WORK TO BE OF
MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY BENEFIT; DESCRIBIW THE
DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS AND EKPENSES
TOEREOF; AND PROVIDJUG FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter
referred to as 'Agency") DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLIOWS:
SECTION 1. The public interest and convenience require, and it is the
Intention of this body, pursuant to the provisions of Division 12
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the
"Municipal Improvement Act of 19130), to order the construction of
certain public imgirovements, together with appurtenances and
appurtenant work, in a special assessment district knomi and
designs ed as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT tin 82 -1
(hereinafter referred to as the "As .sment District "). ,
nFSCRIPTi ON OF IMPROVEMENTS
A. The construction of certain improvements, together with
appurtenances and appurtenant work and acquisition, if
recessary, in certain public streets and rights -of -way in the
Assessment District, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto, incorporated and so referenced. for further
particulars, reference is hereby made to a wap cf said
Assessment District p'-eviously adopted
B Said streets, rights -of -way and easements shall be shown upon
the plans - herein referred to and to be filed with these
proceedings
C All of said work and improvements are to be constructed at I:*
places and in the particular to- ations, of the forms, sixes,
dimensions and materials, W at the lines, grades and
elevations as shown and delineated upon the plans, profiles
and specifications to be made therefor, as hereinafter
provided.
D The descrip!ion of the Improvements and the termini of tn+ work
contained in *his Resolution are general in nature. All items
• of work do not necessarily extend for the full length of the
description thereof. The plans and profiles of the work as
contained in the Engip,er's "Report" shall be controlling as to
the correct and detailed description thereof
I .,
% i
Whenever any public way is herein referred to as running
between two public ways, or from or to any public way, the
intersections of the public ways referred to are Included to
the extant that work shall be shown on the plans to be done
therein
F Notice Is hereby given of the fact that in many cases said work
and i=rovement will bring the finished work to a grade
different from that formerly existing, and that to said extent,
said grades are hereby changed and said work will be done to
said changed grades.
OESCRIPTI01 OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
SECTION 2. That sail improvements and work are of direct benefit to the
propertle, and land within the Assessment District, and Agency
hereby makes the expenses of said work and improvement chargeable
upon a district, which said Assessment District Is hereby declared
t., be the Assessnent District benefited by said work and
Improvements and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses
thereof, including incidental expenses and costs and which is
described as folluws.
All that certain territory in the District include] within the
exterior boundary lines shown on the plat exhibitinq the property .
affected or benefited by or to be assessed to pay the costs and
expenses of said work and improves *nts in the Assessment District,
said map titled and identified as
"PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1"
nd which said map was heretofore approved aM Ihlch said map or
diagrrm is on file with the transcript of these proceedings,
EXCEPTING from the area shown within and delineated upon said map
or plat hereinabove - eferred to, the area of all public streets,
public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public
courts, public alleys, and all easements and rights -of -way therein
contained belonging to %he public. For all partictlars as to the
boundaries of the Assessment District, reference is hereby made to
said boundary map heretofore previously approved, and for a
complete description of said lssessment District, the said plat ans
proposed boundary on file shall govern.
REPORT OF ENGINEER
SECTION 3 That this proposed improvement is hereby referred to the appointed
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS, who is hereby directed to make and file
the report in writing containing the following:
A. plans and specifications of the proposed improvements;
1D
� • B. An estivate of the cost of the proposed works of Improvement,
Including the cost of the Incidental expenses in connection
therewith.
C A diagram showing the Assessment District above referred to,
which shall also show the boundaries and dimensions of the
respective subdivisions of land within said Assessment
District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the
Pesolution of intention, each of which subdivisions shall be
liven a separate number upon said Diagram;
0 A proposed assessment of the total amount of the assessable
costs and expenses of the proposed improvement upon the several
divisions of land in proportion to the estimated benefits to be
received by such subdivisions, respectively, from said
improvement. Said assessment shall refer to such subdivisions
upon said diagram by the respective numbers thereof;
E. The description of the works of improvement to be constructed
under these proceedings, and acquisition, where necessary.
When any portion or percentage of the cost and expenses of the
improvements is to be paid from sources other than assessments, the
amount of such portion or percentage shall first be deducted from
the total estimated costs and expentes of said work and
improvements, and said assessment shall include only the remainder
• of the estimated costs and expenses Said assessment shall refer
to said subdivisions by their respective numbers as assigned
pursuant to Subsection 0, of this Section.
BONDS
SECTION 4 Notice is hereby given that serial bonds to represent the unpaid
assessments, and bear interest at the rate of not to exceed the
current legal maximum rate of 12% per annum, will be issued
hereunder in the manner provided in the •improvement Bond Act of
State being Oiviztgn 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of Calt`ornia, the last installment of which bonds shall
mature a maxtgum of and not to exceed FOURTEEn (14) YEARS from the
second day of July next succeeding ten (10) months from their
date The provisions of Part 11.1 of said Act, providing an
alternative procedure for the advance payment of assessments and
the calling of bonds shall apply
The principal amount of the bonds maturing each year shall be
other than an amount equal to an even annual proportion of the
aggregate principal of the bonds, and the amount of principal
maturing in each year, plus the amount of interest payable In that
year, will be generally an aggregate amount that is equal each
year, except for the first year's adjustment.
•MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913'
SECTION 5. That except as herein otherwise provided fgr the issuance of
bonds, all of said Improvements shall be made and ordered pursuant
to the provisions of the 'Municipal Improvement Act of 19130,
being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California.
SURPLUS FUNDS
SECTION 6. That If any excess shall be realized from the assessment, it shall
be used, in such amounts as the Aaency may determine, In
accordance with the provisions of law for one or more of the
following purposes:
A. Transfer to the gene ?al fund of the Agency; provided that the
amount of any such transfer shall not exceed the lesser of One
Thousand Dollars (51,000.00) c• five percent (5%) of the total
from the Improvement Fund;
8 As a credit upon the assess -ent and any supplemental
assessment; or
C. For the maintenance of the improvement.
SPECIAL FUND
SECTION 1. That the legislative body of Agency hereby est,iblishes a special
fund designated
IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1
into which funds may be transferred at any time to expedite the
making of the improvement herein authorized, and said funds are a
loan and shall be repaid out of the proceeds of the sale of
assessments as authorized by law.
PRIVATE CONTRACT
SECTION 8 Notice is hereby given that the public interest will not be served
by allowing the property owners to take the contract for the
construction of the inprovements, and that, pursuant to Section
10502 a of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, no notice of award of contract shall be published.
GRADES
SECTION 9. That notice is hereby given that the grade to Mich the work shall
be done Is to be shown on the plans and profiles therefor, which
grade may vary from the existing grades The work herein
contemplated shall be done to the grades as indicated on the plans
and specifications, to which reference is made for a description
I -P r
..� fI
F of the grade at which the work is to be done. Any objections or
protests to the proposed grade shall be made at the public hearing
to be conducted under these proceedings.
PROCEEDINGS INQUIRIES
SECTION 10. For any and all information relating to these proceedings,
including Infcrmation relating to protest procedure, your
attention Is directed to the below designated person at the
department Indicated:
LLOYD B. HUBBS
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P. 0. BOX 807
9320 BASELINE ROAD
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
TELEPHONE: (714) 989 -1851
PUBLIC PROPERTY
SECTION 11 All public property In the use and perfomance of a public
function shall be omitted from assessment in these proceedings
unless expressly provided and listed herein.
ACOUISITIOH
• SECTION 12 That the public interest, convenience and necessity requires that
certain land, rights -of -way or easements be obtained in order to
allow the works of improvement as proposed for this Assess.. -mnt
District to be accomplished For a general description of the
location and extent of the easements or land necessary to be
acquired, reference is hereby made to maps on file with the
transcript of these proceedings.
DIVISION 4 PROCEEDINGS
SECTION 13. Agency intends to fully comply with the proceedings and
provisions of the 'Special Assessment investigation, Limitation
and Majority Protest Act of 1931', being Division 4 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California A report,
as required by said Act, will be on file with the transcript of
these proceedings and open for public inspection
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of _ 1982
ATTEST:
Y L RK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
i STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Y
CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1
EXHIBIT 'A•
The work! of improvement proposed to be constructed are generally described as
follows:
The construct.on of certain street improvements,
including grading, clearing and grubbing, paving,
base and storm drain improvements, together wit',
all appurtenances, including acquisition of rights -
of -way where nertssar;, to serve and benefit pro-
perties within the boundaries of ASSESVENT DISTRICT
NO 8: -1
a
:a
.i
9
RESOLUTION NO G -'
• RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL PASSING
ON THE REPORT OF THE ENGINEER, GIVING
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING A
TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA, CALIFORNIA,
(hereinafter referred to as "Agency ") has instituted proceedings for the
construction of certain public works of Improvement and appurtenances under
provisions of the 'Municipal improvement Act of 19130, being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in a special assessment
district known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1
(hereinafter referred to as the 'Assessment District'), and,
WHEREAS, there has been prepared and filed with the Agency a -Report- provided
for in Sections 10203 and 10204 of the Streets and Highways Ce:2 of the State
of California, and this "Report' has been presentee to the Agency for its
consideration, and,
WHEREAS,a Resolution of Intention for this improvement was previously adopted
by this Agency; and the *Report' as now presented shall stand as the 'Report"
for the purpose of subsequent proceedings hereundt•
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1 That the above recitals iwe all true and correct.
SECTION 2 That the "Report" of the Engineer referred to hereinabove 1s
considered adopt-d, passed upon, and preliminarily approved,
as follows:
A. That the plans and specifications for the proposed
improvements to be made, contained in said "Resort" be, and
they are hereby preliminarily approved and adopted;
0 That the Eng rear's estimate of the itemize, and total costs
and expenses of said acquisition, where necessary, and
Improvements, and of the incidental expenses in connection
therewith, contained In said 'Report", be, and each of them
are hereby preliminarily approved and adopted;
C That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to
and described in said Resolution of i^tention, and also the
boundaries and dimensions of the respec,ive subdivisions of
land within said Assessment District, as tie same existed at
the time of t1i2 passage of said Resoluti„-I of intention,
each of Which subdivisions *Rave been given a Pparate number
upon said diagram, as contained in said 'Report ", be, and it
is hereby preliminarily approved aid adopted;
.a
S
a
J
0. That the proposed assessment upon the several subdivisions of .
land in said Assessment District, in proporti�a to the
estimated benefits to be received by such subdivisions,
respectively, from said acquisition and improvements, and of
the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said
'Report', be, and they are hereby preliminarily approved and
adopted;
E That the maps and descriptions of the lands and easements to
be acquired, as contained in said 'Report" be, and the same
are hereby preliminarily approved.
That said •Report' shall stand as the Engineer's `Report' for
the purpose of all subsequent proceedings had pursuant to said
Resolution of Intention
SECTION 3. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON THURSDAY, THE 21ST BAY OF JULY,
1982, AT THE HOUR OF 7:30 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE SPECIAL lEETING
PLACE OF THE AGENCY, BEING THE LION COMMUNITY CENTER, 9121
BASELINE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ANY AND ALL PERSONS
HAVING ANY OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED WORK, OR ASSESSMENT, BT
EXTENT OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, OR TO THE PROPOSED GRADES, NAY
APPEAR AND SH CAUSE WHY SAID WORK SHOULD NOT BE DONE m AP.IED
OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RESOLUTION OF INTENTION w,J TH:
•REPORT• OF THE AGENCY ENGINEER. PROTESTS MUST BE IN Ia11T1NG AND
RUST BE DELIVERED TO THE THE AGENCY AT OR BEFORE THE TIME S'_' FOR
THE PUBLIC HEARiNG
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is nereby directed to give notice of said
Public Hearing by causinq to be conspicuously posted on all open
streets within the Assessment District, nct iiore than 300 feet
apart on each street so posted, but not less than 3 in all, notice
of the passage of the Resolution of Intention and of this
Resolution, all In accordance with the provisions of said Division
12.
SECTION S. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of said
Public Hearing and of the passage of the Resolution of Intention
and this Resolution by causinq such notice to be published in
accordance with Section 6066 of the Government Code, in the DAILY
REPORT, the newspaper designated by Agency as the newspaper for
all publications as required by law and as necessary for
completion of this Assessment District
SECTION 6 That the City Clerk is hereby directed to mail notice of said
Public Hearing and the adoption of the Resolution of Intention and
of the filing of the 'Report' to all rersons owning real property
proposed to be assessed, whose names and addresses appear oa the
last equalized assessment roll for Agency taxes prior thereto, or
as known to Agency, and to all other persons as prescribed in
accordance with the P'ovisions of said Division 12.
SECTION 7. That the City Clerk is hereby further directed to file a copy of
the proposed boundary map in the Office of the County Recorder
within fifteen (15) days of the adoption of the proposed boundary
map; said boundary map to L- In the manner and form as set forth
in Division 4.5 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the State of
California.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of _ . 1982.
ATTEST:
U IV CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
0
9
MAYOR
CITY OF RANG40 CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
-� RESOLUTION NO. C : 'I
RESCLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL REFE-
RENCING PREVAILING WAGE SCALE AND
DIRECTING CALL FCR CONSTRUCTION BIDS.
WHEREAS. the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. (hereinafter
referred to as 'Agency') has heretofore instituted proceedings under the
provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 191!', being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of
certain public works of improvement in a special +ssessment district known and
designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1
(hereinafter referred to as the 'Assessment District*). and,
WHEREAS. it is the intention of Agency .o also call for sealed proposals or
bids for the doing of said work and impro.emrnts in said Assessment District;
and,
WHEREAS. it is necessary to determine the prevailing rate of wages for the
various classifications of workmen required in the performance of said work,
NOW. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SEr TION I That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That it is hereby determined ar4 ascertained that the general
prevailing rate of per diem waS s in the locality in which said
work described is to be performed in the matter of the
construction of certaic• public works of improvement, togetner
with Appurtenances, in the Assessment District, under the
provisions of the 'Municipal improvement Mkt of 1915', being
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
Cal;fornia, for each craft or type of workman or mechanic needed
to execute the contract, and also the general prevailing rate for
legal holiday and overtime work of each craft or type of workman
or mechanic, is in accordance with the schedule obtained from the
Director or Iodu: trial Relations, pursuant to the previsions of
Section 1;73 of u.e Labor tone of ire State of California, and
reference is hereby oade to copies thereof on file with the
transcript of these proceeaiags. Mich said copies are available
to any interested party upon reque;t Further, a copy shall be
posted at each job site during the course of construction.
SECTION 3. That the proposals or bids shall be opened and examined at a
i public meeting so called; and said resu is of the bidding shall
be reported to Agency at the next recular meeting after the
opening of the bids.
7
SECTION 4 That the terms and conditions for bidding on
rPprovemeni for this Assessment District are as
full In the Bid Documents in the specifications
ap, ^.roved by Agency. Reference is hereby aude
Documents heretofore approved and identified as foil
NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1
the works of
set forth In
as previously
to said Bid
ows:
For all Particulars as to bidding, the Notice Inviting Sealed
Proposals above referenced and approved by 3ency shall govern,
and all terms and conditions for bidding shall be pursuant to
the provisions of the 'Municipal improvement Act of 1913'.
SECTION S. That it is hereby determined that in the event the contractor,
contracting owners included, does not complete the work within the
time limit specified In the contract or within the time limit as
Agency sh.iil authorize, the contractor or contracting owners, as
the case may be, shall pay as liquidated damages the mount or
amounts as set forth in the specifications for the Project, said
amounts herein referenced and so incorporated. That it is
Impractical to determine the actual damage Mich will be sustained
by reason of such delay, but that the stated sum is a reasonable
amount for said liquidated damages and is not being imposed as a
penalty.
APPROVEO and ADOPTEC this day of
, 1982. •
ATTEST:
ZETP .
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
,I,
MAYOR
CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CA.IFGINIA
a
RESOLUTION N0. t
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL SETTING TIME
AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON ADOPTION
OF RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO ORDER
ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS.
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHn CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA
(hereinafter referred to as 'Agency'), is conducting proceedings for a special
assessment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the 'Municipal
Improvement Act of 19134, being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State or C, 'ornia, for the construction of certain public works of
improvement, tog :r with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection
therewith, incluaing acquisition where necessary; said special assessment
district known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02 -1
(hereinafter referred to as the `Assessment District'); and,
WHEREAS, under said special assessment district proceedings, it will be
necessary that certain right -of -way acquisition be made in order to accomplish
the construction of the works of Improvement as proposed, and at this time
this governing body is desirous of setting a time and place for a public
hearing on the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity relating to the
rights -of -way and /or easements not yet acquired for the project and
improvements in said Assessment District; and,
WHEREAS, there has been presented to this Agency for consideration, a proposed
Resolution of Hecessity to Exercise the Right of Eminent Domain relating to
this Assessment District, a copy of Much is on file with the transcript of
these proceedings.
NOW, THEREFniE, IT 1S HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That ..he above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That certain right -of -way acquisition is necessary for the
accomplishment of the improvements as proposed for the Assessment
District, and said rights -of -way are as set forth aid described in
the Proposed Resolution of Necessity to Exercist the Right of
Eminent Domain, a copy of which is on file with the transcript of
these proceedings, with an Exhibit attached thereto setting forth
the proper and legal description of all rights -of -way to be
acquired
itN
SECTION 3. THAT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON AMR317RT, THE 21ST DAY OF JULY,
1982, AT THE HOUR OF 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE SPECIAL M =ETING
PLACE OF AGENCY, BEING THE LION COMMUNITY CENTER, 9121 BASELIhT
ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ANY AND ALL PERSONS WHERE
EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS -OF -WAY ARE TO BE ACQUIRED, WILL HAVE AN
0 OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAR CND TO BE HEARD ON THE PATTER OF THE ADOPTION
OF THE RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO EXERCISE THE RIGHT OF EMINENT
1- DOMAIN TO ACQUIRE £ASERENTS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY NECESSARY FOR THE
i ��
FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS IN THE ASSESSMENT OISTRICT. ALL
PERSONS OBJECTING TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY FOR THE
PROJECT AND THE DETERMINATION AS TO hHETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT IS
PLANNED OR LOCATED IN THE MANNER WAIICH WILL BE MOST COMPATIBLE WITH
THE GREATEST PUBLIC GOOD. AND THE NECESSITY FOR THE PROPERTY TO BE
ACQUIRED, SHOULD BE PRESENT AT SAID TIME AID PLACE. PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1245.235 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, THE FAILURE TO
FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST TO APPEAR AND FE HEARD WITHIN FIFTEEN (15)
DAYS AFTER THE MAILING OF THIS NOTICE WILL RESULT IN A WAIVER OF
THE RIGHT TO APPEAR AND BE HEARD.
SECTION 4. That for further particulars, reference is made to the proposed
Resolution of Necessity, with the E :h bits attached thereto, as on
file with the transcript of these proceedings, and to Section
1245.235 of the Code of Civil Pro-:edure and related Sections
thereto.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1981.
KAYGR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40NGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONd11
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
0
4.
'it I
S�rRr, N.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA
MEMORANDUM
May 14, 1982
To: City Council _
From: Harry Empty — Finance Dilrc or
SLbject: Revenue Sharing
It is that time, of year to act Public Haarings on Revenue Sharing.
We will need one Public Hearing on Revenue Sharing prior to Budget
hearings and a second in conjunction vith our first Public Hearing on
the City Budget.
The City will be dealing with Entitlement Period 14. The estimated
allocation for the City is $4530150.
It Is recommended that the first Revenue Sharing public hearing
be conducted at the City Council Meeting of June 2, 1982.
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
`���tX'.tnrQic
� E
4 �
DATE: May 19, 1992
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Comunity Develrpment
BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: STATUS OF ETIUANDA SPECIFIC PLAT
The Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory Committee has cozpleted the
preparation of a Policy Plan for the Ettwanda Specific Plan.
This Policy Plan was made available to the City Council and general
public a few weeks ago. The policy plan s.., forth the goals, ob-
jectives and policies which the Committee has adopted over the course
of the last several meetings in selected topic areas. The Policy
Plan also defines land use concepts, which the Etiwanda Committee
has reviewed to its process to determine appropriate land use for
the Etiwanda area. Essentially, the policy plan represents the
completion of the first phase of the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
The Policy Plan is organized to provide a detailed background on
problems and difficulties within the Community Setting (Chepter 2).
The plan list the goals, rbjectives, and policies in the following
areas:
1 11 Community Character
2) Vehicle Circulation
3 Commarcial Services
4 Parks
6 8 Trails
Land Use Adjustments
Within these selected topic areas, the Committee has reviewed and
adopted objectives and policies which will be used to define the
specific development standards of the Etiwanda Plan. Also within
the Policy Plan are a series of illustrative conceptual diagram
indicating the overall Intent of the land use plan for EtlYanda.
Continued . ,
lq 7
�x
.f
Status of Etiwanda Specific Plan
City Council Agenda
43Y 19, 1982
Page 2
Now that the Committee has completed this process, the staff will prepare
the technical portion of the plan which spells out the development standards
for Etiwanda. These development standards will include land use regulations,
architectural standards and guldelines. It is anticipated that staff will
be working on this compa...snt on the plan through July, at which time it 1s
anticipated that a draft Specific Plan with all comoonents will be available
for public revied. Staff will hold workshop sessions with the Committee an
the draft plan before recommendation to the Planning Commission. At that
time the Planning Commission will hold public hearings in order to begin
their review of the Etlyanda Specific Plan. It is anticipated that this
wllI occur at the later "part of summer.
Staff will make a brief presentation at the Council meeting and be available
to answer questions of the Council on the status of the Etiwanda Specific
Plan.
Re ectf•illy submitted, •
JACK ,, A
Director of Coamunity Development
JL:TJ9: jr
z. °S
L
May 4, 1982
0 P `
urverome Cow*
The Hoiorable Mayor Jcn 0. Mikels
c1him ror WOW
City iisll
no eft By
9120 Base Line Rd., Unit C
C °'
QrvOi°Q u
P.O. Fox 807
RarcAt Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mayor Mikels:
We world appreciate your help in asking your fine
r°•` �,awo1o"
C1cy Council to adopt a resolution in support of
Proprsition 9 which is 58200 Peripheral Canal
on the June Ballot.
•."".�,..
Y• M.u�y
•
I am enclosing a co!y of the resolution in support
of Gropositic^ 9 'f you need any further information,
we would to happy to supply it, as we are out doing
all we can to get a 'yes' vote.
... a..e .e.. ou.e
.... c.c......
B ^•.t wishes,
Rl ERSIOE COUNTY CITIZENS
FOR WATER
b +bwgV
/ Kr/
J. 5 eag
Ge ra
Lh roan
...w..,
Y /mc
w•-4��
Enclosure
V gR.Cyrwp.
ObO
.MCI.Y..IW YR
Gp � N1N...a....
l-
#,..
�u� x
.;5:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING
PROPOS/TIO1. 9.
WHEREAS. Proposition 9 is a comprehensive wet r devel-
opment and water conservation measure designed to meet the water
needs of every region of California while providing unprecedented
environmental protections; and
i, Proposition ensure sd years
by conservnngandetorinthousands ofacre- etofsurpluswater
which are now being lost to the Paciiic Ocean through the Delta;
and
WHEREAS, California must maintain a water policy consis-
tent with the high environmental standards needed for the pro-
tection of our natural resources; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the State of California and
all of its residents to develop a conscientious program of water
conservatiou;'and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Water District, which supplies
most of Southern California, will lose over half of its Colorado
River water allotment in the mid -1980s due to a 1963 United States
Supreme Court decision (Arizona vs California); and
• WHEREAS, California aggriculture faces a critical shortage
of water, which could result in a loss of production; and
WHEREAS, the fish and wildlife populations of the Sacra-
mento - San Joaquin Delta are being destroyed by present methods
of p*=ping water from the Delta; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 9 authorizes major water conserva-
tion and waste water reclamation programs; and
WHEREAS, the Peripheral Canal, as authorized by Proposition
9, will protect food production by supplying California agriculture
with desperately needed water and will helo replace the lost Co4o-
rado River water on which Southern California now depends; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 9 will help rescora fish and wild-
life populations in the Delta and San Francisco Bay to their
historical levels of 1922 -1967; and
WHEREAS, the cost of the Peripheral Canal, as authorized
by Proposition 9, is $680 million in 1981 dollars, which would
coat the average family of five living in Southern California less
tha;. $10 a year; and
WHEREAS, only those who benefit from the projectz autho-
rized in Proposition 9, will pay for them; and
N'
i
WHEREAS - Praposition 9 was approved by the legislasvi'e
and signed by the Governor in 1980 as SM M and muss, now gain
voter approval in the next statewide election;
on;
es atYCou
endorses Proptin9 SB OX and, Urges ESvteby c e a i-
fornia electorate
PASSED, APPROVED, a J ADOPTED this 1Sth day of Nay, 1982
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
n D..N 5,. yor •
ATTEST: Jo
Lauren assermap, Qty Cterk,
s �
1