Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1985/12/18 - Agenda Packet
lei MY or RANY—M crCANSON a•. CITE' COUNCIL AGENEA Lions Park Ccmcucity Cancer 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California Dreier IA. 19AS - 7.30 gum- All items submitted for the City Coaatil Agenda moat be in writing. She deadline for submitting tbese items is 9:00 p.ru on the Wednesday prior to the meting. She City Clerk's Office reeeLvas all such items. : -A , NrA 1 i a' l' I _ CALL t0 ORD7Jt A. Pledge of Allegiance to Tleg. 8. Roll Callt Wright .. Suquet _, Mikels Dahl _, and Ring C. Approval of Mi0ucd$: Rwember 6, 1985 Rovesher 20, 1985 Movaaber 25, 1985 rt` 14 A. 2 Thursday, December 19, 1785, 7890 p.a. — PARR :r DLVELOIXOT COMMISSION — Lions Park Community Center. � 9161 Eaae Line Road. •� B. Thursday, January 2. 1986. 7:00 p. m. - HISTORIC ` � PRESERVATION COMM 3101 - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 tau Line Road. " C. Thursday, Janoaq 2, 1986, 7:30 p.m. - CI1T COUNCIL ' MEETING - 6ions Perk Community Center, 9161 Eau Line .1 Road. : -A , NrA 1 i a' l' City Council Meeting -2- December 18, 1985 1, +_ corssr Leman.. • The folladsg Cooaaut Calendar item are ampaceed to be routine aad sou- controversial. They vill be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. A. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 12 -18 -85 and 1 Payroll ending 11 -24 -85 for the total amount of 500,518.98. B. Approval to forward Claim (CLSS -035) against the City 6 by Glenn R. and Linda Parker for an automobile accident at the intersection of Archibald and Bacyam Street to insurance carrier. C. Approval to forward Claim (CL85 -036) against the City 9 by Clayton W. Dickinson, Jr., for automobile damage on Haven Avenue, aorib of FcotbLll, northbound right lave, to insu -acne carrier. D. Approval to forward Claim (CL85 -037) against the City 11 by Wean Hieneyes for automobile daoa2e on Haven Avenue. north of Foothill, northbound right laud, to sosuranre carrier. E. Approval to forward Claim (CLBS -038) against the City 12 by Eric E. Walker for automobile damage on Archibald in froot of Frito Lay Plant (driving northbound) to lasurac:e carrier. 7. Aporwal to forward Claim (CL85 -039) against the City 14 by Joyce Davis for automobile damage at the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Lawn Avenue to Lasuranca carrier. ' G. Approval of Improvement Agreemeut and improvement 16 ,. Security for Parcel Map 9498 located on the northeast cortex of Hawn Avenue and Fourth Strut submitted by Rioter /Rinker. RESOLUTION NO. 85 -334 31 A RESOLUTION Of THR CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT'f ;x OF RANGED CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9498 (IENSATIFE PARCEL MAP 9498). IMPROVEMENT ACREEMdIS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES H. Approval of Isprwamemt Agreement and Improvement 32 -� Security for Parcel Map 9416 (COP 84-d1) located on the northeast corner of Haven and Highland Avenues „ (w submitted by Diversified Properties III Ltd. { 7 City Council Meeting -3- December 18, 1935 49 50 63 ■ 64 67 68 71 72 76 is RESOLUTION N0. 85 -335 A RESOLUTION OF IA CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9416 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 190. 9416), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES I. Approval of Map. Improvement Agreement and Improvement Seeuraty and Lien Agreameut for Parcel Map 9318 located on the northwest corner of Haven and Seventh Street submitted by Martin Marietta Corp. RESOLUTION N0. 83 -336 A RESOLUTION O' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PARCBL MAE NUMBER 9318 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 9 ?18), IMPROVEMENT AGEREMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CC37RACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT J. Approval of a Maintenance Agreement for a Drainage Facility located on the northeast corner of Haven and Highland Avenues submitted by Lymnabaven Joint Venture. ' RESOLUTION N0. 85-337 '. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC.Z OF THE CIrf OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR A DRAINAGE FACILITY FOR TRACT N0. 12922 R. Approval of summary vacation of A portion of Seventh Street at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue And Seventh Street. RESOLUTION 10. 85 -338 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION Or A POETICS 07 SEVENTH STREET L. Approval to vacate a Portion of Almond Street between f Rapl Street and Anathyst Avenue. RESOLUTION N0. 85 -339 A RESOLUTION Of TIN CITY CODICIL OF THE CITY OF RAM CNo CUCAMONGA. COUNTY Or 8Y BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DECLARINO ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A 70RTION Or ALMOND yik STREET NMI= DATE AND ANEIRgT AFRNUR Mj�" % \�,' �t<aeiv.y ��Y l�i�•,'n \lk�.`..� J.n ��`_�LYf -S :V December 18, 1935 49 50 63 ■ 64 67 68 71 72 76 is City Coun:il Meeting -4- 7ecoober 18, 1985 M. Approval to release final sonumentation cash deposits 77 for Tract Dos. 11173, 11173 -t and Tract No. 9472. Iract Nos. 11173 and 11173 -1 :1,500.00 - Tract No. 9472 $4,200.00 D. Approval of "@cation of Loan A2reaeent between tae 78 City and Pbilo Diane and Jason& Diana, Owners of Parcel No. 201 -083-47 and Parcel Bo. 201 -083 -49. for payment Of annual aaeaments for Aaassmeat District No. 84 -2, Alta Lome CAsonsl Improvements. 0. Approval of Collection Services Agreement (CO85 -123) 83 with Casa and Associates for the purpose of collection* of delinquent accounts. P. dpproval to release model bome sales office crib 87 deposit for Praet 11173 to N. J. Stuck 6 Sons, Inc. Cash Deposit $2,500.00 Q. Approval to accept the Beryl Park and LLcns Park BP. Redevelopment Project. RESOLUTION NO. 85 -340 e9 OA RESOLUTION 07 THE CITY COUNCIL DP THE C17T OF RANCHO CUCANOBCA. CALIFOOI:, ACC6P?IDG In PUBLIC IMOPENINTS FOR THE D2tYr PARR AND LIONS PARK RIDEPELOPMIII TROIa'.^T AND ADTHORIZIDC THE FILING OP A NOTr :1 of COMPLETION FOR THE VQRR • R. Bat public bearing for January 15, 1936, for favironmental Assessment and Development Code Amendment 65 -04, City of Reecho Cccamtega. ! B. Bat public bearing for January 15, 1986, for • Eovlroaecmtal Aesessment and Industrial Area Specific Plan kocadwat 33 -03. City of Reecho Cucameags. ' I. Bet public bearing for January 15, 1936, for Development Code Amendment 85 -06. A. �swn ^ram aI:ALT s TQ CIT4 n_y m�wwn wnw,.�. —.., 9O ��1»G Poticv iQQ�2 Review of a Dousing Policies Myatt. as rquirad by Istarsal Reveau Coda 3metloa _ 103A, es said report relates to tSa hoaaisg policies _ which "0 to be used in 092jametiom with the t Radev6l%wrat Agency's Nortgags Rt••1 Program. bLt,�i ':1`¢iKj7!!4p� '�,}!�!'O +vat .•.1: @zf =Y"ft�'„ : ter.. -. 0 AUSLUM A. CORRICIION_OF_MLMICIFAL CODS - Aa Ordinance correcting denuabering of Section* within the Municipal Cods. S City Council Meeting December 1E 1965 f. r RESOLUTION 30. 93.341 103 •;. _ A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY r.OUNCIL Or THE CITY OT RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA APPROVING {� ROUSING IOLICT REPORT Or TIE REDEWfLOPMfNT ' tZENCT OF TEE CITY Or RANCEO CUCAMURGA, ORDER i INTERNAL REPINU6 CODE SECTION 103A AND }' DIRECTING ITS PUBLICATION B. CI7T Oe R_�CRD C^r�u•�•_ REPORT - 104 Review of a Sousing Policies Report, a rwuirad,by the P Internal Eavanae Coda Section 303A, as said report relates to tto housing policies which are to be used in conjunction v"h the City's Mortgage Revenues Bond Program. ' RESOLUTION R0. 83- 342 116 A RESOLUTION W TEE CITY COUNCIL W THE CITY Or ONCHO CUCAMGRGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVINO HOUSING PDLICT REPORT ORDER INTERNAL REWINDS CODE SIMON 103A AND DIRECTING ITS PUBLICATION C. PARR AND ■ECBEATIa LARD DEDICAUCE OBDIRAM ^"R AMANDM<•T 117 - Proposed amendments to Chapter 16.32 of the Rauch* Cucamonga Municipal tide pertaining to the dedication of Park and Recreation Land as a condition of ). subdivision. i ORDINANCE NO. 103D (first reading) 120 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITE Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA. '�• CALIFORNIA, AMD= SUBSECTION E Or SIMON b� ` 16.32.030 OF TAN RARCN0 CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RBLATIWE TO TAU AND RECXIATIONVL LAND � DEDICATION RNQUIRBMOTS , AUSLUM A. CORRICIION_OF_MLMICIFAL CODS - Aa Ordinance correcting denuabering of Section* within the Municipal Cods. S ` 1 City Council Meeting -6- i% ORDINANCE 90. 283 (eacomd reading) •- M ORDINANCE OP SHE CITY COUNCIL OF SHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIe, EEPEALIINO ORDINANCE 10. 247, PERTAINING TO OFFENSES AGA13ST POLICE DOGS, AND ORDIN YICY NO. 257. FERTAIBISG TO USE OF ALCOHOL L PUBLIC PLACES, AND AMCIIDING SIiLU 9 OP SRS RMCRO �• CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL COD% BY ADDING A NPD CRUM 9.16 ENTITLED "CONSUMPSIOP OF ALCOHOL ID PUBLIC PLACES". AND A aER CHAPTER 9.18 ENTITLED "MISCELLMEWS OFFENSES." A. H • r I vrqq THE ♦, COUCTI Of or ARTI-SHMING ORDTNAWCZ, 1985 meeting. B. Ir 1 1 '1 91 • COUNCIL ,,. I 11 yl sw 1. RIC ,q f f' •j. 1.1 C. AUTHORIZATION 1 CONDUCT AN /.IJ 1 A Coal= REPORT ZUr-LENCK WORKSHOP IS 1916, D. FROM • ♦._.:1 11... IMPOUNDING HM e '1111"ZIMMIM-2111 SYSTEM. Massr To EMOTIATI CMTSAP.T 1 11 1f • .11 J• y - 1 Y. 1 . 1. Am . . N' InT.T. ad- .r 1 e / , l• MMUM-3=-7001111 I TO ROUTE -10, YET nfly0firn FGOTffML December 18, 1985 122 125 126 129 131 138 144 d 162 l�1 V S rr:'ICYI r a• o�ta�.n City Council Meaticr -7- Jai 1 aN124M?11T TO �01�/! �. v ep IOATIdO CYM -P.. LESCLOTIOD NO. 85 -343 MCLDTION OF TBE C1 77 COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RABCBC CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AWDIBC ITS RBSOLDTIOB 80. 85 -132 J c• ■. AOTDD�4 A. Adjourn to closed lession to discuss parsannel msttars and disposal of property at the intersection ncrth of 6th Street and Buffalo. 8. Matting to adjourn to Thursday. January 2. 1986, fox regular rating. 1,V :� Detecber 18. 1969 t .75 - 178 - 179 :i b'o d1 .7 q P L M WPJ�VTPNPNN! » »Y ♦! NPNrWJIN NWN •1 NNIVruPPPOlrVNrPr NPNJ�NNmnJV INr »N JpN r1'P VrPNd •nrNPPrPdeNrWOdrTNrVrJPrMyNrrdd �vvmmmTOO� ^�- nn�n�!r ©oosr =gym i^cciiPay� >c�ry� t2.N.s�iA�y��s���siioi'o cCsrsmnosB�E�yoM•�mfi� °�> >i N iY. SYT}� °0000° DrSf�•n non 1. STATra�rr Cn20� YmSrrSi T>m »U D P+•m >N Im» >i1r GrrS P'S -� o yOG�O nxOrDrrs onmMrfn�il <T�n1ln '�e'vr. iswiimYY »zoT 'Y- °1+°•+'.T. �Sm �izT.P -rm <or pmTPN<R +• yr rr ».mmPn nr »YOSR > Nn I. ymp (� »maeSn�D irT�n °Many�i n�n�.I•.D C�cv.`.i y° nT NnN��i�B nl1N f»' Sy°^ ' nNT�S�nTY yy Nvvl•D N 00 n4S1 mFAD0 Nn<n nT n TO00 m m0 r > 21 ^o °.°..° .Pa < _n nlr on a 55 v n m >r .I NNNY 2't < 2 Z ° N Y d C » P • r K Y n 4 ° y m m _ f 1 n nN »vKeN q n nr ro »N »tN pV Yrr Icy ^+nTr vn »'NN z^Nadarsgri�si T�= B'r" -� »•.O rDMYFC•Y>i= »I Nng��yTT� ^ s: n'•P anA Ca Ca Nn »�rTTINn I�n� ^T� »'� f�ma N >�YCc'+•m n�nrfi�nf•:�rP wnN+•N NC�� r _nf�'!..br�LPi�rrryNPrnrr ti _ rCNN�D� n 1 V a � PAy31 1 I r oe a rfio noonnnon onsio MPMNNMPPj�±±1�j�fP � I fOPJNVNMM V ! Vn Nfl'r PO�J VI�. �OrPyPIOlY�4 I IIJ 1 f 1 .p YW✓ V ° APNNPPyPlJ� I I P°OMd �u0 dr PPdVN01. OOaOMyOP d0 YPPrn NIV IJO 1 YPJ 100 IOV iP09 I I ( i -lily ( I i I ax n i n nr r=r• jl •P P 4 N N i oeonnoonnoroeorneneno �M MPPVNJNON O.P NNNNNMNMN I•I J+JI I.f JJJyIJJlJ11lJJ yuuWy V..uNYNNNNNUUN p dnYP MJ.V4•�ndPrPNlVNrC l 1 - V n OWN WNO NN JuNNJ YuJn� »rNrOarOPlu rNNN00 IiO pNpfI V?NIMNOPNpruNPPVO �OOC nIP 0011W IV JMf�P V'w�00V i ! I 1 K a p x a a ' r iz n is c 1 � S n i > Sk a IS a m II 1 � . 1 1� 1; Iw aye h ,rooriom+°w.N..+lp.-. 1 m�ia «:oia `PVO<acui. .a E<I:r . Io-rPgJaJJPWPMnONNWaPrgra ...P-WP..Nq W.•R •I:JWU•/N i� i T zFas�ni zYi <ci'�a:miirT VarozzzzziFe:"cxt ox...z.. olno r iiirixn >T�NV� Nn Im 1 n �v°I ^TSioNOiTyr- rommsi ^ ^ ^n� zsP �in-Ii m�zFNTn:os Nmc.• y SSmST »Krr J }W 1LNN1"• ��TT a.+23.Cnoa r nrTma> m'L�.z �2 =wOOrmw zvm1a>zz^ 1� ~ 3(, ; '�tlrum prcrw < - +ff >ao�Mlc mFT ^o. No arma•.y^ C_(� Lp >NrOmm> ^ .nOP ;r Cw iTrDC -_ On 1 °aY(tT MTNNDODi A." 1 nOr p yywm3;m Ana, y n ODw > nM. n v x AzN ° i.".nro i N jT.z. n So.a'I.n°N , 1. T O yY•nNN n .°i2D N N y •Y SNN 1 ° n Y.IS >3 � NO_nNM n ^ T I n i n ^ 1 � I 1 1 Tr...rf P.. n.`=1T ^)r STxr1V02 °nwr 2 >rT 2f NNmmm :al.m �tNgNTrr>rccm..ficnz :S.NDDg�cWO. 1 � s zYNrNnuT ^'< <r•..YNmzxm >NNtlwtl>omTPrn � nA1R N�E7S a.lo-imr��N1N.lwll moi. g5nnc".n >vm .. ^.�•^r l°- >e ". r -'(ztn i «: >< IS .D..o vwaio p a azol-a mveW ° u zbrooxa as ^> nrz°a�nNy�TDZasti aTa v>m N,vaa^ vi°I.<+i n m >�tlw n•w°nTNrT3Ow 9 O iM _ �w pLy<<yyOOmw m 3 m ^NYm wi�� �9.Y( � ~D.•1Y S)n >NK N NN Iwn� y SnNNN jD � J yN S rrrYr.. oor {(�Z N r.rr;iS Sw y NmTCTN 1 ' S j�SZ xD2 NMw�r nr., w yNnr n 11 n rn O ,nn AAA nn nw I IN x x ` M N .. 1.1 1 T nxi O 1. Isi. ..Zi lli.3i. .fin ..ti f. A P D I l tl UT aDD aD D 1 11 NNM IM PpMOC.°°n0O1100pnU•fO nOp(.4pOnOOWn00O00nnO0n V PNMPpPgw N.q>PMPPPgN'V NPMpVgpppggiqPPPpM i. Ec 'wbLPP..YJ'1.`+- Ji$yM•Jly�p 1 1° rOt > iP V° EEJ aEEEE: omsSbm n.p pOpP nabrPUJUN- oaerpPJWUrnabro-gJWNroabrwpJUNr In O �. 1 I 'P {{ I 1 u N I In Ii r ml 'WwN I I 1 , J la In 6bWwy0 YYYY �v OOJOPW W.�OrrPn.JVrww Jrgr.(Yr MVr �MVPRMYNM !V I IObaNP0WP9 `r60wVaP nOJOrn °.. NI�0O�Oa1JaMNTQN^1pYb ;Y ` O Y..OrJ.0 . 0000..1... ly VOOVndpO 00 UN ONnO00VOOrO�nNNJ JnNbPppO...���111O.Id N OMJrCbOONN Ot•]O 1'O VOOWO ;° 1 i � I I ' 1 1 I aye ra i i � 1 i 1 I I ' 1 NPYV♦.YVYWVYY rVVYrVN bin. 8rWJrrlrpJ..NJWIN 'N WNPI.ONybY %r- ,pPMO,pjNn JC IdNpOVrpr�NlpO�V°r!w rarNNONNNNNNNmTNN�NNNNMaasm AJi °c.°.> ° >>O ° °i °<nz e4z i mn aCL° <>> °e °ccc °OC4i`i �'c �zti ri rmyza9z>orznnnTrr_.� < <rrSrr�rrr "19SV N >r°r2rnr Sn >ZO TrO�roOSSZSZZN2^ Ohm m-f A a OS'•'T O(w» A >r rOrO' >OTiTTATJO. O{. Ty�Dn - 1nTAn > <a +'n�'C -'r OOyw rTU2iN � � �T> °i n220_ OSy »9 >/�OOT TNY - N- N >nnnnnna�C1N °DD rT9 »nTONOIInOy >On> rrr' -rrr°� �» MIN nyy oa ° Nao S'fi �'i? nr��Nrn"c"<'rTCa� N n O rN } Tr00 TO wnzo 9f (Ir rbor t Ir>..°..°.o ov oo irc N 9 °� i� I aozz oru I I Sz Qrz I A � N 1 I I I rn< rnararuPUpe<r9<n >m°znwa.+namsror n<aTPrrN �97TMr I °II> yNSONN T�00 N n � n nnnnnn 1+ n nn ' a � a ar rraa a a - nr yIr y IT �i I � w IN.'.NN I, , ))` I P f�, ssF>�nt. -i< asc:Pia ro 9n �> rM I rz nnn nn nyy n� TT: Rx `I TTT MV 1pt °onto° PPNPaMm� ,a>gnnoo sPypmJWN i 1 r 1 19 �I 1> r ' w r 1 � 1 r ' T i 1 2 i a it ii im in is a a �n i n o �1 a n z • N aO�ll�ii f^ -Pia• , ))` I P f�, ssF>�nt. -i< asc:Pia ro 9n �> rM I rz nnn nn nyy n� TT: Rx `I TTT MV 1pt °onto° PPNPaMm� ,a>gnnoo sPypmJWN i 1 r 1 19 �I 1> r ' w r 1 � 1 r ' T i 1 2 i a it ii im in is a a �n i n o �1 a n z i 1 � r '1. rO�,P «r NmP� WWM�IP JS lY 1 It A 9Xy I AI. N Tp�y N %AS Y A ;m �« j i09Nlp�mT2^ M °pJ.KtmiO I 1 I zz °T `henna^ i i ibahpM i N '• � Y_fl 9 I Y. N I � ' "Sov ^o2Yim J Vp \NYhp� IN 1 I .n nNlINA2h I � INN ,1'jN'm M 1 I i r 1 p S .49..9`t 19 I � I I m i oM �i� r• I � �szuii�.n m „• ' a• u�o�wuwia ;� i 1 � r '1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Sr saw 8s oxcrl CLINNIN. e1RACUS[ A MLLCHIM n�.:o :. E C r ,ee •sun, rurs r,rn �Ty OF RAN 4 i V t f9 Lo. ulaau, ^ ° „,oRNI7 Own ADAfln C O CU O(yCq AN DEC Eft 7i” 41firli�JFU . AUams fm Defendant, CHRYSLER CORPORATION ! II IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUB STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO GLENN A PARKED, LINDA PARKER Plaintiffs, V. VZLLIAN EVANS, WILLIAM THURLOW EVANS, CHRYSLER CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES 1 to 100. Defendants. CASE 170. OCV 36391 CLAIM AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITY 100 DAY NOTICE (Government Code Section 905 905.2 910 and 910.2) TO THE CITY OF RANCEO CUCAMO))GA: CHRYSLER CORPORATION hereby presents its claim against the City of Rancho Cucamonga and make: th :- fol'nving stitement in support of the claim: 1. C`aimants name is CHRYSLER CORPORAT:O)). C39irdnt'S post offire addreas it•: P. 0. Box 1919, Detroit, ))I 402887 _- 2. Notices contarving this claim should be sent to .., r Kurt Stiefler, c/o Clinnin, Siracusa a Belcher, 700 S. Flower °�' I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 '19 Y^ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 St , Ste. 1014, Los Angeles, California. 3. The date and place of occurrence giving r,;e to this claim are February 12, 1985 and the intersection vi Archibald and Banyan Street, City of Rancho Cucamonga, respeutivelys The circumstances giving rise to this claim are as follows: 4. On or about February 12, 1985 at the intersection of Archibald and Banyan street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, plaintiffs, Glenn Parker and Linda Parker were involved in an automobile accident with William Evan3. Plaintiffs contend that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is in some way responsible for a dangerous condition of the streets at the location Mere the accident cccurreds plaintiffs contend that the Chrysler vet,iclo in which they were riding was negligently manufactured end /or designed so as to cause or to contribute the plaintiffs oamages. 5. Claimant is unaware of the injuries sustained by plaintif or the damages sustained by them, if any. 6. Tho names of the public employees causing the injury, damage or loss are unknown to claimant as of this date. 7. The amount of the present claim is unknowns it depends upon the value of plaintiffs case, if any DATED: December 3, 196) 17 -2- BELCHER Byt__ •V'lNV • RDA. A. STIEPLER, Attori for defendant, CHRYSLER CORPORATION 3 . VERIFICATION STATE OF CALIfORNIn, COUNTY OF I have read the foraoina Wd know Its outlets. EI CHECK APPLICABLE PARAGRAPH ❑ I'm a pany to this anion. Tte re.iten stated In the foregoing docummt an "a army nwn knowledge cro pt as to thou matters which are stated oe infc.nnatioo and belkf and as to thou marten I believe them to be Ino ❑ 1 am O an Olficv ❑ a Paton Ca of a parry to this auto", and am authuriud to make thb rcrtficetion for and calls behalf, and I make this vetifieatlon for that rraen. O 1 am informed and behave and on that SmuAd allege that the maters stated in the foregoing docomem are uuc Q The matter, stated in the foregoing document an true of my awn knowledge caccpt at to thou mitten which an stated cc information and belief, and so 'a thou rattlers I bcliae them to be true. ❑ 1 am one of the anornrys for_ _ a party to this anion. Such patty Is ,bunt :kcm the county of aforesaid when such attorneys hive drir •Rica. and I make this verification for Wd an behalf of that pony fat that twon. I am informed and bdkm and on that ground allege that the matins stated In the foregoing document are true Executed on , 19—, AL — Californio. 1 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the Sure of ghfomla that the foregoing k true and carne Tape or Print Name Sipuiun ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF DOCUMENT (other Nan summons and complaat) Received copy of document detedW u on 19 Tape or "t Name Sgumn -- .'RrVF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF I Angeles I am =played in the county of Loo Anopl na Sun of CaOfarnn. 1 am ova the cep if to and not a piny to the within anion; m business, address W 700 S. Pl "wen Sr-. Ste. 1014, Los Angeles. CA. 50017 On Dec. 3, t9 BSI arced the foregoing document dacrihcd as CLAIM AOATUST PUeIT.TC pis the Parties below _ N this action by placing a true copy thereof inclosed in a sealed envelope Wrested u follows: City Nall Attention: City Clerk P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 ® (BY Z Asil. I noted such earclope +IN pottage thf.con fully prepaid to be placed In the United Suter mail a 111%l1fomia. Eue,ted on— December 3. 1985 , 19. at T.na Angolan California. ❑ (BY PERSONA, SERVICE) I caused such mvdope to b. de0vered by had to tha allk a of the addressee. Executed oat 19^ at . California. ® (State) I decline under penalty of perjury volts that laws of the Slate of California that at above Is true and n uv L ❑ (Fadera0 1 tied= that 1 am =played in the office of a number Who ber or Nk court at whose direction the service was DANA ANN MORGAN / S Type or Mat Nara igaaw . rowan ewasawoa.wwvr.aa♦ g !� t I CLAIM fog DAMAGt on I] MRY 2C C44 tA)4AA&,J 1. Claims for death, injury 'i person, or to personal property must be '14 no la er than 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sea. 911.2). 2. Claims for damrges to real property must be filed no later than ?_year the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sea. 911.2). Mt CITT or AMCM COCA OMA U Q.N%0..y �% 10414.wN.aael ass Fa\aW amt )S 4214011 g0 Name or Claimant Address Zip Phone Age _i..'J" 4t,u.Z.oCNa yJl. T- wAkw..w G.. eck:SNS AAONSS t0 ve1o6 C.1lmaet wishes no.lces Net. =1 did damage or injury occur? r�.e.v \c.,,. w1w,s ,1985 '1'. SS Am MM[ did damage or injury occur? 1-i •ca..a •.e_ �45M% k RM and under what circumstuess did damage or injury occur?ltk%r.. wk y,nt,ati •,.t•ShaA lw..L 11.a ns MAT particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or injury? (Include news of eaployees, if known). MAT sum do you Olaim7 Include the estimated smount of any prospective loss, insofar as it may be know At the time o• the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the a2OMt claimed. (Attach astimatas or bills, if possible). �3��t4 Zr.LP4 Asa \a � l•beti ! �494� _ [ Sam- >lt•C\. 1 t'S� \vnat{ � ' - 2 Oeyi 'R.t..�l.l dua\N�,0.e,Q• o_e�C.w0. 40'1 Total "t Clalseds A KL413 and addresses of witnesses, doctors, and hospitals) DEC JF M maa 9 Date 7�e s ignctun of C1aLaet 303(47g) -RC(C) 9 I « ..xs ► x -..s CREST CHEVROLET CHEVROLET tlrnYNK p. tP.p W AND AU OT'•[i «A.[s ® 0.Y b[CH ''//t/1 Po Box 170 &,w Y.Wr PKn Irl OK.r.rN «Ir«Ir KI MI Fr/MI M W MN M SAN![ANAPOINO CA 93407 MiK. $ ^ PNON[Ulullp48it0 P.O.M.. Cu c_n.. CIA`I t IGx1 A44,m 'y1 Yn. Spf. nR' fu• ps �7KU1 N.. C.• . - 7 Pou. O.Irsp1.�- YUU N.. Md.qY Inl.ruu Co. AIIY.e.r Phu. PAS H., TN YnOFYPrM IIM e. t UTIMATIR OF REPAIR COSTS tlrnYNK p. tP.p W rdP•NI MY1♦ a MYr. nyM1 «IWN 4IP M M ''//t/1 ♦.VI MNrN YF OµYynytl 1hK MI111y IWIN iMnN M & &,w Y.Wr PKn Irl OK.r.rN «Ir«Ir KI MI Fr/MI M W MN M MiK. $ ^ wri TN YnOFYPrM IIM e. t 04 I.rN NnNwP KM .M K M PAe1N Yn om.A tlrnYNK p. tP.p W rdP•NI MY1♦ a MYr. nyM1 «IWN 4IP M M ''//t/1 ♦.VI MNrN YF OµYynytl 1hK MI111y IWIN iMnN M & &,w Y.Wr PKn Irl OK.r.rN «Ir«Ir KI MI Fr/MI M W MN M MiK. $ ^ M .r11 a ani roc NNE Ga DWM 6—�r7'/+'�"a 1. Claiss for death, injury to person, or to personal property rust be tiled no later than too days after the occurrence (Cov. Code, Sea. 911.2). 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed no later than 1 year She occurrence (Gov. Code, Sea. 911.2). To: cm or gncm cocAtnooa nn i oriy -do- %35 7/4 - ame 6f claimant I Address i1D Thong Age 11 did damago or injury occur? // / 1 did damage or injury Occur? �%t /P/1 aI My ari under what circumstances did damage or injury WT particular action by the City, or injury? (Include cases of employees, if k WT sum do you olaim? Include the it may be known at the ties of the 1 computation of the amount claimed. i e .a, AM employees, caused the alleged damage or :ad amount of any p tion of this Claim, eatimetes or bills, octive loss, insofar as ;ether with the basis of possible). , �a o2 ' - a Total Amount Claimed: 1_ NAM end addresses of witnesses, doctors, and hospitals: i 2 P Date If 303(47e) -ec(e) UP l/ �ySc ccr-�;7 0" FOR NKKZ 01 TyJ"T 1. Cleima for death, injury to person, or to personal property auat be filed later than 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). - 2. Claim for damages to real property meet be filed ao later than 1 yiaf= the occurrence (Cov. Code, Sec. 911.2). Tilt CITY Or SYCHO CUCAMlMA Eric F. Wagner 8774 -508 Crescent Center Drs RC 91730 714 -989 -4944 Rams of Clamant Address Zip Phone Age Sd:1d ems Ahove Andrea# to which Clsimast wishes notices sent. VMl did damage or injury occurt _12 -3-85 VMit did damage or injury occurt Archfbold nl —Front of Frito Lay Plant - NW and under what circumstances did damage or injury occurt Drtvina North on Arahttald enr rfnht raar'ttre'h)t'afant pot hole Pot hole was Riled with water and an m.rmna ar woof," devices fdentfffed its preacence WW particular action by the City, or its emplcyese, caused the alleged damage or injury? (Include nemes of employees, if known). Failure to mark hazard, improper dratnaae foihrro to maintain ado auateat pnagad g comtructfon aLaos able hazard& Mhat am do ;ou claim? Ioclude the eatmated amount of any prospective lose, insofar as It may be know at the lima of the presentation of this etch, together with the basis Of computation of the amount claimed. (Attach ostimato$ or bills, if possible). Tyre replocement and service call Bill attached 0 88.38 Hub cap eatfmate per TA TE Cadillac 1980 Sevtllo 3 piece hubeca $ 85.00 Total Yount Clamed: g 171.38 RAW and addresses of witnesses, doctors, and hospitait: Elaineertna department of City of RC - Lloyd - notified 1244S and aubsecutnt DEC x805 �� i Date ��� #..111 Signature of Claimant 18140 EUCLID ST.. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CA 82709 (714) 432.8861 • CORPORATE OFFICES IXVADU tIWY141111 mvf ' Y14AA• + 1t11WANM X t111r�Y 1117•u711#ARM UM71APf «! ')q 41uN Wmt.u11t11 II0GYVMU1 /111 umm(A117u immu11111 Ipl-0 {It I/f11177•1711 ptq IYW17l (714)1114111 (111177{•8119 1714).411111 1711117W1I1 7REl7 Ne1ta{1M IWAW KELLY - SPRINGFIELD 01111. wtlp..ld•m b W rm M vdtw 4vi b YN tl r M ttl•Y dd prq�1I4MY WwOtl h rm Iri•11m irrop «M «b 1111 Ynr IdMI b1Yl ilm '' m/11 Ntl 1�b'1 b Nm IMW CIO R/ prrmY dIC• Y MK IN h wdr 1nY M nbvrMY b «M Y1a rnM• «Y�y b W «eV«IY. MrM�I M fw o. -+ rr««ry bw M b Intl. b rf r.dMb r .rrrY IIM. b M rwnl r r6 Y odK YrA✓L7 • m1oW1 rinry 1b rm dJ YW dY of M«M W M MY Y/ 411w+nerq bYrW rY4rur9.1m0�rM•asnrllw.►1 rrvW lr Mew nWrwr4b Mld�rr.l Wmnr>,rr7 mw.Yw Mrmrmnwvia tw �/ a r,a. vwrY m Itin M r.w• r wem• Wwb. M.Wr.M mt b Mtl «barYY M bm d lw.y, b WYI « ««it Y11 M.VIdY Y «b M Ya t'rR' 4 al M1Y YrYC•brr wnbh COrICfA 17D�rw nr "' b •y b r.r brilbGY. tl.wn«.w 1 /•.�dY v.e a Ir11 o�w brw wb.wn � t M .r+.s. my.1 ««wWl r M 1�ti .y Itt A01R1MD(7, mY r n.41 t•,nW1 Y M.IIY11 rbYl 10 «y ltta x�mnlalsaaNOlNyypamrt +�cw¢YCmlrurwwmtc WCMER / S, AFT"M 7lM1011Fpn s � ulos on tors ON cuamrA t IbIW111 IAW INTERNATIONAL. INC SHIP MR. WALKER P�74 -506 CRESCENT CENTER TO ' 4OVrHO CUC CA 91730 . SERVICE CALL 360207515 YOKOHAMA Y360 20575R15 8 ( 360 WW TL L1 LABOR L STD COMPUTER SPN SAL UNITS- 3.0 WEIGHT. 0.00 1 + THANK? FOR SHOPPING TIRES WAREHOUSE 't } -*1 30.001 3. 328 1 LOC 07 CS„ FK ' ORDER A 114498 12137 P.M. M� 1u � ' I 1 53.17-* 53.191 1 5.OG' 5.001 I . I I s E1 ,a I" BURNS. PALUMBO. MILAM & BARONIAN A rm,ssa L, CarXn �s -39 December 10, 1985 - Rancho Cucamonga - Attn: City Clerk it E d d � 1 D — P.O. Box 807 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOttCA Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 A.OMINISTR TION i.e. c ewm PRESENTATION OP CLAIM DEC U. 05 ro 1 Claimant: JOYCE DAVIS. 7&9:1/tn11211'219t411518 10132 Bristol Drive, Alta Loma, California 91701 2 Person_ presenting claim: BURNS. PALUMBO, mium E BARONIAN 5939 Monterey Road, Los Angeles, California 90042 3. Date of Accident: September 2, 1985 at approximately 3:30 p.m. 4 Accident locatio-1: Intersection of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California. S. Facts of the occurrence: Roadwork being done in the area of the intersection resulted in holes and depressions in the roadway. These areas were not sufficiently marked off nor were warning signs put up, such that the driver of claimants car drove into a depression, lost control of her vehicle and struck a tree at the edge of the roadway. 6 Acts or omissions of entity: Roadwor% done in the area of the intersection resulted in holes and depressions in the roadway. These areas were not sufficiently marked off nor were warning signs put up, such that a dangerous condition existed. 7. Damages: Claimant's car, a 1980 Toyota Celica ST, license 0252SA, was totaled as a result of the impact. The vehicle had a total value of approximately $4,000.00. In addition, claimant incurred costs for towing of the vehicle and storage of the vehicle. Total damages are approximately S4,SOO.00. NA r7 3919 Woo" Ilad. la AQPk4 GYfamL 90511. Tdep9me (1:3) 22L= M S' Y f i d- >. -Z- �8, J .1 F ALUM10, A IAIONIAN K s, All other information will be submitted when obtained. - BURNS, PALUMBO, MILAM L BARONIAN, - Attorneys for JOYCE DAVIS. {�JClaimant, // yµ Steven Banner S' Y f i d- >. -Z- �8, J .1 F CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 18, 1985 011 T0: City Council and Vity Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 9498 located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Fourth Street submitted by Reiter Rinker Gateway Parcel Map 9498 was approved by the Planning Commission on Septeab,r 11, 1985, for the division of 43.88 acres into 5 parcels in the Industrial Specific Plan Devolopment District located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Fourth Street. The Developer, Rioter Rinker Gateway, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Haven Avenue Median Fourth Street Median Faithful Performance Bond: $66,500.00 550,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 533,2% 10 $25,000.00 A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. L R.s have also been approved by thq City Attorney. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 9498, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. I L tfully suit : Attachments i• rr VICINITY MAP CITY OF PROJECT: Parcel Map 9498 RANCHO CUCAMONGA T:TLE: vicinity yap ENGINEERING DIVISION f% EXHIBIT. :t l .ai>,0.,�.VJL a.4.- .i-z:. r {.n. ' y_� •e.. ..s"t'.w:a ti t� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR HAVEN AVENUE MIAN M 9499 ° KHOO ALL HER 91 THESE PRtSEATSt That this agreement is aside and entered late. In conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regu taboos of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of Csilfornla, 4 municipal Cerporatlos, herelnaftar referr- ed to at the City, by and between Said City and iT[R RINKER CITrW" hereinafter referred to as t % a are eper THAT, NaENTAS 2:14 Oereloesr desires to develop cortatn real property In said alt; touted ten ere rrren.ase rnratr of w . A , end rUrLh StrHt t and ONEREAS, said :lty has estaolleled cartel, requirements 1 to be met by slid Developer es Prert4ulslte to granting of final approval; and qq improvement WHEREAS. the as Ahereinafter hciteO. And approved posting gthe City Attorney, are dewed to he equivalent to prior to m0lettoe of said requirements for the purpose of securing said dopreeat. NOM, THEREFORE. It Is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Derelopfr as follows' 1, The Developer hereby agrees to construct at dera10Der'f axe ale all improvements described on page 4 hereof within 24 months from the date hereof. the I. resolution Of This therA COURCISIAat Of he lid City an efthis 41reaaent. This agreement shall be to default on the day follow- ing the first anniversary Aatt at told approval unless so Allen. Non of its Au been granted by Bald City as hereinafter provid. ed.• i 7. The Developer may request additional time In which to complete the previsions of this agreement, to writing not less to'" 30 days prior to the default date. and tacladteyy a statement of circumstances of.necesslty for additional time. In Consider,. Glen of such requnt, the CIty -,sewn the right to railer the provisions hereof, Includtnq construction standards, cost estlute, and sett tclen cr of the Improvement [,curl ty 4w4 to rtQuirO. Adjustments thereto who me.d by substantial chum a 4 If tie Dtveleper fails Or neglect, to Comply with the provisions Of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any list to Cause talu provisions •o be completed by any law. his Sorely thee and/or full cost and expenser Ire con rrdiln sovdOlnp ° S. ConftruCtlon perms is shall be ohtalmed by the Oerel -4 per from the office of the City Engteeer prior to start Of any wort within t" oubtle eIght•of -way, and the developer shall ° conduct t °. such wart In full compliance with the regulations =" ' apnbin ed [bevels. ROn- COMPIlanct oey result In stopping of the wort by the C1tY, sad assessment Of the Pynaltles Provided. trr 6. Public right - a /••al Improeuent work aunties fAa11' v be constructed In Conformnce with a prom taDrarement plans, Standard Specifications, And standard Drawings and any specT I ly •�' � i O.R., Retie P.M.,CIA / UU m+� w:. _:•�_� i ,4 .2_ [•t , •t ,,,• � .. Ufa t' = i[ IV tr_f 3� r' r t aO:ndman(s thereto. construction shall Include any transitions t and /or Other fedideatal mart deemed necessary Tor drainage Or »r . pubs It eafety. Errors or o"13slons discovered during construc- tion shall bo corrected upon the direction of the City Enotnt*r. Revised wore due to said plan modifications shall be i+ d covered by the Previsions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original Planned wares. i I. tort done within @sifting streets shall be diligent. { ?•t ly Pvrfued to completion. the City shall have the right to `y coaPlete any and all rare 1n the trans rf unjustified delay In completion, and tt recover 411 cost and expense Incurred from the y, :y Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful meant ! S. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, rf t relocations. or removal of any component of any irrigatlas water system in conflict with the required wort to the satisfaction of A the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose race and other debris from the public right- df•way. >„ 1g. Tha Developer fMil DLnt and maintain partway o tees at directed by IAe Cd m flity gssiopseit Director. 11. The Improves%! security to be furnished by the aa,*I *per to guareatel comDle. on of the tern of this egreasent shall be subJact t0 thr approval of the City Attorney. The petn• CIPal amount of Said improvement security shall not be lost than the amount shown: ,4 .2_ [•t , •t ,,,• � .. Ufa t' = i[ ■ t. r, FAITHFUL PIRFORPLINCE Type: Principal Amount: $".S00 Name and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR Type: Prinelpat Mount: $]],250 Name and address Of surety: CASH DEPOSIT NONUNENTATICN Type: Principal Amount: N/A Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE NT THE CITT IN NITNESS HEREOF, the Partin hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and Icknowled2t wtth all lormsiltles required by taw on the dates et forth o p 1 their signatures. Dated b , Developer gn"urt Bor. 3 n e Date Dy Developer .qna un me Acceoted: Illy of meneho Cut noagee Californl, A Hunlclpei Corporation By: , mayor Attest: —Ziij tiT T — Approved: City Attorney conssdr_oranme J- o .m .15thsp— �.r�nitlY�NorvNemmeber Yb p ttAL b.l b. as NAHLT S. NINAER ft W 4 W Pass. ww" mesa, 16 FNAIICNef Y. JOKE$ eaebl(a,Yea bal t: +M /.eeaYr� MamMYnMb Yb YtlQmYrebMeblYMbptW aY 4pblb w�i, pm'Oiw� esaWereMr WYb fuYeelap e�mamea WaMe• •Oe,�bN:A ills Yememb Y/b PaYm,.y maYmL LIImW erMWYtle YY. 1n.�iweae�n�lYw +��lwasr0e '�/� YLa/kOa:(r_ •Yllw' ^s+ CITY or RANOIO aYANONW tKRCAQMERELR?Wit IFEEISCIIEDU.E -..v orawing No. NOTES one eat Include tyrant fee For ruing peralt or pavont dtpmltc ._M -NTIT UNIT I IT[N NiiFi. M MWINT L.P I I.C.C. curb . 12` c.F. 24` putter, Las L.F. I I.C.C. curb . 6• C.I. N` guttcr L00 L.i A S.so 7 amvr S.F. 4 4• F.C.C. sidewalk 1.75 S.F. D Drive approach 2.so -� S.F. 6 6` I.C.C. cruet pater (enc. curb) 5,40 C.T s street RACaat)m L E.1 d LSO tMaVmM,n. S.F P Preparation of suEgraft era 0.15 N TOM A A.C. 1 1700 font) 27.00 t� N TON A 13-4hL p 900 to 1)l10 font) 3S.00 S.FF A A.C. ~ ~ !Nita") 6O.OJ !Ni law) S S.Pat. an S.F 1 A.C. Itra�1 I.IS EA. A A4fost serer clean out to grade ISO.00 [A. A Adsust Mater valves to prat 75.00 EA. S Street lights 1000.00 -_ l.i R Rarrlcafts (Intersec. SSW win) 1500 L.F. 2 2 a 4• redwood hta4or 1.75 Reim S.F. R Re al of A.C. pays t 0.15 _ -- -_� L•F R RMVSI of P.C.C. Mb 2.37 _»itr - L.F w wa at of A.C. berg 1.00 EA. S Stratt signs 200.00 EA. R Reflectors and Post 5 SS.06 • •-•� L.F. C Cincrete block wall 25.00 S.F R Retaining wall 20,00 - --. �- TON A Aggregate base 0.00 C.T C Concrete structarws 4 425.00 I I. P, 1 16` AV 2 2000 0 2 29.00 -_ L.F. 2 24• Ras 1 1500 0 2 25.00 _- L.F. M M• RC/ 2 2000 D� 4 49.00 -�, L.F 4 49` RcP 1 1200 0 7 76.00 EA. C Catch basin V ` 4• 2002.00 EA. C Catch basin N ` 22 4500.00 �- u: , tsslim a 1007.00 EA. o ,Localimp t -_ EA• o outlet Sir :twre• Std 1506 1,000 0 ��. [A. w ward posts 40.111) L .Aft, L.f S . L.i R Rednood header 1.75 _ S landsapiny 6 Irrigation 2.7$ =2M R.F. 6 Lao fIMINEERIIO 1115PECT100 FEE a.�L�72� SOB TOTAL RISTOAATIOWELIOEATICA CASH � �. nn.. an C LAM AND MATERIAL IORO ( ) 4 ehriaant 4 City N Ronde 0rcalow a 1rA1Cipa1 Code, Title 1, Gr6wnrle Cnty [aft States. a 14, a ash mtoailaV. ft�fr 106, adopting N Raft prior to tssoanca or a Ea0lneaing Cmtrwctlo F"it.Ineat.te depmlt shall 1/84 r •n rr s RrrltN 2/N a.,5r,4 c performed at the tins and In the manner therein spec //led, and to ' rr shall Indnsnlfy and save harmless city, its Officers, agents one Seal fees. as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall Bona set 9166915 Premluei41,197.00 AS a part of the oblfpntt0a sectored At n DS' 4,14 In aJdltloe to the face amount specified therefor• tMre a be 10:1sded casts • FAITHFUL PERFORRANCE BOAR WHEREAS the City Council of the City m Rancho Cue"o,ya, • State of Mifornis. and AERRER OATCYAT a General pnrtnerehlp (bonln & /ter des lgnabd n pr nc p. art entare into an agreement enereby principal 491841 to Install aad cadplsts r Bert a in designated gestic Improvements, which said sgreememt, ,. dated 198 and Identified u • proJet Is iirebr referred to add ! d• __ made a Oar[ ergo tan , ' WHEREAS, said principal Is required under the farms of raid i agreement to fur+lfh a band for the f-Ithfal perfo•manee of emto - agreement. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, we the prinalpei J MIAOPCO W4 as surety, bra held and tnir bounC ...a � 1YFCE� o7 manc6o Cucamonga (hereinafter called sri t• In the panel $w o1 �1�t� six thousand -_._, - palte 'iS a aw u Monty Of e 4011.i %"$I. far the payment of c s:e wall and truly to be .ado, w, bind oursstveb, our ,. heirs, successors executors and d i,straters, jointly and severally. firmly by these presents t The condition Of this obligation Is such that if the above " boundsd principal, his or Its heirs, executors• administrators• successors or &$signs• shall In e11 tein9a :and to .na as/aa by and well and truly keep and verist. the covenants. condl[1Ona and c performed at the tins and In the manner therein spec //led, and to III respect$ according to their true litea: snA ■aaafnq, and shall Indnsnlfy and save harmless city, its Officers, agents one Seal fees. as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall becama null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. AS a part of the oblfpntt0a sectored At n DS' 4,14 In aJdltloe to the face amount specified therefor• tMre a be 10:1sded casts - , and reasonable expem[as and fos, Inc lading reasonable aitarasy's M', Incurred by City in svccnssfclly gnferclnq such eb ttgetlon, {" all to be liked as costs sod Included in any Judgment read.Hd The surety heelk) stipulates and agrees that no change. - - -' extension of time, alteration Or addition to the terms of the a9raamemt Or to the work to be performed thereunder or the asset. f icetions accompanying the same shall in anywise affect Its obligation$ on this brad, and It does hereby valve notice Of anT such change, extension of time. alterstloo or addition to IN ' tens of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. i 10 WITNESS WHEAEOe, this instrument Las been duly executed by 1 the principal and surety above named, on 00'saw a HM P ese &per P IM& ere T 91, ♦ Al Y t , [array 41 ' Ovid c.11wo .<+ PLEASE ATTACK POWER OF LTTORAET TO ALL 10201 r..:_ 11CRATUAES RUST OE NOTARTIEO ltd n1,33trEt1 aW wy...w.: I .1 •1 &lh� 1 na ¢� s Bond Not 916 Prealua. ant 1' Pal LABOR AND HATERIALREN MO WHEREAS. the Cltr Council of the City of Rancno Cucamonga, State of California, and a a (aerelmef ter designated as pr nc pa art entt�Tnte an vgrteatot whereby principal agrees tw lattall and ceapiate certain daslgnata] public Improvements. &bit% Is d 19reesant, dated l98 >•C toestlffSl as project pt{ f hereby rTrre'l to and made a part here& : aa�' !. YHEREAS, under the terms of sale agreemer q principal is repulred before entering upon the peNormance pf the wort, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with tic City of Rancho •;! Lucaacaya to secure the claims to white reter.Inca Is made t., Title 19 (commeacinq with Section :082) of Part - of Divislyd r of the Civil Code of the State of California NOV. THEREFORE, Slid principal and the undersigned as a Corporate surety, are %aid firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and All contractors, subcontractors, labostrs, utortalmen and All persons employed In the performance of the 'aforesaid a9reomet and referrer to In the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure fe the Sam of tntrt. tn... thnaemd two nanaret .•a_a nr Op /100 Dollars (f for mat.41 M. turn s e or a or nereon a any t ad, or or amounts out under the upuploymmet Ineurenca Act rltb respect to such wort or labor, that said surety rill Day the Cue to an amount not exceeding the &count harelmebove Set forth aeo also to case suit is Drought upon this bond will ply In addition to the face amount thereof, casts and reasonable expenses and fees, Including reasonable a:tor.,ell s fees, Incurred by City to successfully safcrcInq such o011getlon, to he awarded and filed by the court, add to be taatd as easts and to be Included in the Judgment thereto rendered It is hereby expressly stipulated and ha It's wind shall Inure to the benefit of any and all .amD4,,e, and cernorations entitled to file claims IS fcau acting with Section 30B2) of part a of girt• a Civil - as so as to gig • rtght of action to them i the, &signs in any suit bring bt epee tD s bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation skill become cull and void, otherwise It shall be �. and refute to fall force and effect The surety hereby St Ipulates mad' agrees hat no change, eatepstoo of time, alteration or add•tton to the toms of said a9reusat or the specifications aCCOmpanylnp the same shall to may aspect affect Its obligations on this bond, tad It does here- -- by wall• notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. ID 9114ESS WHEREOF. this Instrument has been duly tsatuted by the principal and surety above named, on 93 !1_ �sinlINIZ, 'IM-4:011W elope') ``!LillO6+ p mare y G b 9 era bran /• n• ac .•w, All • Darin C. Bacfar • ') n,. PLEAS[ ATTACR AITORMET ALL CO NOS E TIUIZED + 3 , . r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA " i INFAOy E11CRT AGREEMENT FOURTH STREET MEDIAN r pH 9498 AROW ALL HER IT THESE PICSfATS: That this agreement is nods and entered into. In conforsaace with the provisions of t10 Muni, fool Cuts and Regulations of -he City at goacho Cacemn State of Cel;forGI9, a munl01pa1 co.paratlon, hereinafter PV4g rra, - ad to and REITZ:a the ClcI� by and betwun old city iI HREi CA S hareinafter reforre to a5 eht et—O eTope�•T -- V I 1 THAT. WHEREAS. Said Developer desires to develop cartiln reel property In said C tr located Al ens tans. +.e rr.a.. of sn.a s» am race. %trs.t : and WHEREAS, aaid City has established Cartel 0 requireuntS to be Net by sago Developer as prerequisite to granting of r.,a' approval; aad WHIAEA3, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as tsrelca /ter cited, and approved by the City Attornly. are detald to be equivalent to prior cimpla Hon of told requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW. THEREFORE. it Is hereby egresd by and bot.otn the City and the Developer as follow I The Developer hereby agrees to con tract at not t loper's expiate all Improvements described an pag•f a hereof within 24 mooing from the date hereof 2 This agrge Nert shall be offcctive en the date of too resolution of the COLOCiI of said Cltl aop'oving this agr Meant. This agreement shall bt In dafcult ,s for day /allow. /ng the first anniversary date of said approval enl•es An eit em. seen of time has been granted by said City as borelr,after provld. ad. S. The Developer may request additional Clew In which to Cnnplete the provisions of this agnment, in .• /slog net lest than 10 drys prior to the datault d. {a, and inclulioyy a %tattling of cl rcnmstancw ,of necessity for add it can t is, . In consldera• Lice 01 Such .@guest, the City reserves the ri,.bt to rasltu the rim, h lens hereof. Including constr.:tton standards. cast rA estimate, and saflicleacy of the ImprOvent Sacurlty and to require edJuttmoats thereto when warranted by rubstantlaf changes the r. e. �••• `•. S.f., O.L. 4s.e /.N..CIR� . I. If the Developer falls or n@9LCts to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City hall have the right At any tint to Cause Slid provisions to be 10401eted by any law. fol means, and thoenpon to recover from raid Developer end /or hit Sung the tall cast and expanse incdrr•rd to so doing. 1 S. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Gavel. ,. oper from in* office of the City Engineer prior to start of em wort within the ublec right- of.way, aad the developer Slott - ! f conduct cech war fall compliance with toe regulations P. coat Hnad thereto. Ron - compliance may result is Itoppiey of the wart by Loa City, and assessment of the penalties provided ' 6, public right -of -way Improvement wort required %ball t, be coast In confaruece with a proved improvement Deaf, sbndard spa 8ravings Stir•..'_ l /lcat tons. and Standard aad any species -1. �y Sr �••• `•. S.f., O.L. 4s.e /.N..CIR� . l( SY ' f S t amendments rAtIncidental Construction Shall any tramfltlonf 1 { 5 public other rock deemed recsssary for draio t "Or de necessary _ ; a Error s tihllc safety. Errors or o discovered reti during conttrity Elam sell be corrected YpOn dhf direction the upon l be Engineer. Revised wort bus to sped ream endlndtsecur fnslt he du modifications '- the provisions this aworks. t tub secured by tRn Surat ov l $uraty [During the original planned torts. 7. York done within existing street% shall to diligent - d�'. ly pursued to cdtpletle; the City sell hart the right to - tetolets any and .11 work to the *rant or unjustified delay to completion. and to recover all cost and expense incurred free the 'r. Developer and/or his contractor by any lawful mean$. D. The Developer Shalt he responsible for replacement. 4 relocations. or removal of any component of an 1rr lyyattdm water system In conflict Nth the vagulren wort to toe Is Steelton of • the City Eogfeesr and the owner of the water system. 9 The CevNdo,r shall be responsible for .coral of _ all ldoft roct &Ad attar debris from the public right -of -ray. 10 The Developer shall plant and maintaia parkway tree as directed by the Community Development Director. It. The Impresses t ese%rtty t0 be f*rnish*d by the ' Developer to guarantee completion of the tees of thit agreement shall be Subject to the approval of the City Attorney The prin- ctDal mount of 1414 Improvement Security Shall not be less than f the mount shown l( 4JM e. .%Y v r VIA 1�r7rP t'.Ji'�a'S��t�.yyrtta.t t _ ; a 1 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE T2Nt Principal Amount: $50,000 Nine and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR !! Type: Principal Amount: (25,000 Name and address of surety: CASH OEPOSIT MONUMESTA7101 Type: Principal Amount: $1,150 lose and address of surety: TO RE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE NT THC CITY IN NITNES$ HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the Presents to be daft ea cnted and ack advice a Y th all formalitl et rapulred by law on the data et fort p St t their signatures. Date-41 Dr Developer tYf -- He rri 5. Rlnker Pe Date by Developer pnrturn Pr fated —� Accepted: My of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Nualcipal Corporation By: , Mayer Attest: City Clark ApProved: � City Att2rney iwo— Wadded, tl9U:r Y Otnree J n mem 25th 4a November 5 �'�-- YMwet� �I rba Yr.r WeWM.a N•�tIN NA Ri c bWR�r. ee+YM'11�� I e M _R Wam 1Y/WlmarA�e. ' r CITY OF RA11010 CIICN1M wa ENGIRMING CNCRDACl/IENNT PERMITIFEE SCIUME Fu !ft"coent: &AtL St. Aa .Can Medlne (NUreh half onl 1 Date, 7_•_OnSIDBtL19. 19By oaou[< FS al nearStc.eny ICentact lie nerd lei Flit 0.e er cote: _1M M1 Clty Ora.ing ho. -111A w14 Rll NTE: Does rot tMILAS4 anent in for ' mritleg perimit or Pavement ecins l OIIARITY MIT ITEM PRICE AROWT L.F. r.6[. curb • 12• C.F. 24• gutter 7.25 L.F. P.C.C. nob - 0• C.F 24• gutter 6.00 3L L.F P.C.C. curb only a' S S0 r L.F. A.C. Part. 4.50 SJ a• P.C.C. sld"elk 1.75 S.F Orin approach S.F C.T. 8• P.C.C. cross gutter (Inc. curb) 1.40 curb) Street wavatim 1,50 C.T Imported eebantsnt 1.50 ••[,; S.F ua S.F preparation of Sul Dq ad& gr 0.15 4u:hcd +99. base (;"Inch thick) 0.03,12 Too TM A.C. (war 130G tons) t7.OD Tom A.C. (900 to 1300 tons) 55.00 TrA A.C. $00 to 900 tom) 4S.00 ' - -- SdeF. ]y�- S.F. A.C. under 500 �tyons) 60.00 Patch A.C. M) 0.'SAJS 6! S.F. 1• thick A.C. o +erlq 0,30 CA. Adjust serer Manhole to grade 250,00 - -- CA. EA. Wust Starr clean Wt to grade 150.03 Adjust rater valves to - -� EA. grade MOO Street lights 2000100 L.F. Barricades (Intersec. 5500 min) 1,00 L.F 2 N 4• raAgod Mad= 1.75 Sly 5 F L.F. Rmpval of A.C. Pavement 0.55 Removal or P.C.C. curb 3.30 29an .__ L.F. Rmval of A.C. bee. 1.00 ' EA. Street signs 200.00 EA. Reflectare and pasts 35,00 L.F. Concrete block mall 25.00 ��- S.F. Retaining rill 20.00 TOR Aggregate base 7.00 - -.� �- L.T. concrete structures 423.00 L.F. 16• Ep 2000 0 L.F. 24• PCP 29 00 1500 01 35.00 ��- �� L.P. M• RCP 2000 03 41.00 L.P. 40• RCP 1200 0 76.00 EA. Catch basin M • 4' 2000 00 EA. Catch basin N • 0' 2800.00 EA. Catch basin Y • 22• 4500.00 __ EA. Local depression t• 500.00 EA. Local depression 12' 1000.00 -�- _�- EA. Junctio! streCture 5000.00 __ EA. Outlet structure, sea /506 1500,00 EA. Outlet structure, Std I50) 500,Op �• 40.00 Gua' a paaMi (rood) 25.00 12� L.F. Smrcat EA. Iladrali (a6• ring) 4002.000 • L.F. Rod.00d Mader 0 _ S.F. L.F. 1.75 LuWsW!+g 6 ImIgeston 2.75 Roll curb F.C.C.) 2.7s ta00_ .. ^.P _ B..tt. :.(0 •! lroro ENGINEERING INSPECTIOT FEE PJl!-Ce. S01 TOTA �_- •RESTORATIONICELINFAT1011 CASH f DEPOSIT (R[F1A7ME) NGIRRECATICe SUIfIT (GIH) 4"p -0 CONTINGENCY COSTS S46 /AiiW1A ►EAILiIXLNCE E016T ((1 WS) .,,,- d' LABOR FAT NATCAIri (SOy) -.;•., •Wrsuaet to City N Rambo Gica m"m MIcINI Cede. Title 1, Chapter 1.01• al R�artur�dlro jtsiwaeta i1t Chatters, 1 -3, a tasty rvttaratim/detlutaLIN dap prier Eapinaviay Contructlet Femlt. ` It"Isto 3/It �� Ia I S !r 11 Y S•` a�{ L' Rg f} 1� 7 .l 3 % L i A 0x1 Ax[ 9168951 Preduas 1700.00 'AITMFUL PERFORMANCE sOMO UNEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cutamonga, State of California, and lherotnafter designated as pr nc pa ire en[ero Ma., n o ea 81renant whereby principal agree% to lasts I and complete delta s, ins tpeatad Public tepraYa \•nL[, which said agrteetat, prodec py_gagp (Fe.nn d...e ,w.a 1 1F0 and referred of made a par, area Nn Is �irpby refer. ed to ees YPEREAS, said principal is required under too tarn of sold agreemest to furnish a band for the faltk'YI pRFarmanCO of said agreement. NOV. THEREFORE, we the principal and �. a L as surety, art held and firmly bound men e 7 w panc 16 Cucamonga Pwrelaefter called act, thousand �M Dana/ sum met 11iIIeerr .._— - _ ..._r On7ia�s ; 07 r EF' payment 0 r G fem well and LCY Iy t0 DI cede. we bind ourselves, par hesr1, leCCffSafl executers and Adesoistratorl, jointly and severally. firmly 6 these presents. bounded prinelpol. of his h01 Its firs. executor .h a administrators, o successors keep hall the °covenants, °Conditions an0 provision de therein in the said agreement and aey alteration theresf provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the sooner therein specified, and In all respects according to their true Intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save formless City. its officers, agents and 14100ree1, at therein stlPulattd, then this obligation Shall become pull and raid; otherwise. It shall be and remain in full force and affect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and In addition to the face amount fpeClfled therefor• there shall he Included Costs oed ree'On' I• expenses and feast Including reasonable attorueyes fees, Incurred by City In successfully f.lforcing such o0tigotloe, aI l t° be taxed as cosyyts and Included In any Oud9 men t 'Obligati. The Stenaf0o of %time. altestiona or addition to the that chance. Cof °the •nemSet or to the work to be Performed thereunder or the spell. fina•ions accoapaoytng the Same shall le oeywlss affect ity obll2acl0as om this bond, and It does hereby valve notice of asy such Change, extension of ti a * alteration or addition to the tena Of the agreement or to the York or to the specifications. IN YITRESS b1EREOF. this Instrument has Deem duly executed by the aclpai I he yri M•r and Surety above named, on ei a er 4 . .•f arm oiler N p uraq I'1' u0' eA 9 ° —I At to rmay e- eC [Arid C. aaaror / _•,: /LEASE ATTACH POVEN Of ATTORmET TO all ROROS SIGNATURES MUST RE NOTARIZE �'� Y, s Bun! Not 916639 ! Prealumu Inc- In parfrntmue XLABOR AND NATERIALHEN BOND - WHIMS, the City Council Of She City. of Rancho C ..... n9a, State of California, and AT (hereinafter detlg0ated es pre ncipa u¢ onto re n[o an agreement .hereby principal cgre•s to install and complete". certain d signaled publh IaOrOgm%ts, •been said a recent. i fisted 196 , and identified me art •cc - 4I9E'E�rtn S. rani' eTTfF;•oy •Tired to and made a part ner101'; ate` WHEREAS, under the terms tf sal agreasenof the Irk. It filui red be /ore SUM entering upon ent bond with t of ena wort, to file a 9000 and jutethec payment bond with the City of de In Title 1yya to cewre the claims to which r art 4 o Is mace In Of IS (commode lnq with Section illfc of Part a a/ Derision 7 of the Civil Code at the State of Cal if sidle NOW, TNEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a Corporate surety, are bald firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucampnyya and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers• mater felmen and other persons employed In the Verformanc• of the aforesAid agreement and raferrod to In the aforesaid Code of a civil procedure In the sue of TWInty fly tA¢uund ----W IOD 7 Oollart (S__2�5�.000 )), for mater • s furnished or a or thereon of N any kind, 0.705 amounts ova under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor• that said surety will pay the Y sue ter an amount not exceeding the amount her•Inabore set forth, and also In cafe [v1t If brongnt oDOn this and will pay 10 addition to the face amount toereef, cosh and rexsonabla expenses sod lees, Including reasonable attorney's fees, lac.rred by city In Sacco$, ally e•forcf ft, such obligation, to be awarled Cud fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to bb Included In the Sediment therein rendered It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this send shall Inure to the benefit of any and all persons, coepanis, and corporations entitled to file cLlme under Title IS (commencing with SlCt lace 7082) of Vert 4 01 0lr if an 7 of the CH11 Code. so q to giro • right Of amt ton to roam or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the Condition Of this hoed be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and voldp otherwise It shall be and remain In full forte and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no chaege, % .� tension of time, alteration or addlti on to the terms of S +id agreement Or the speclflceti0ns accompanying the same shall In sexy manner affect Its obligations on this bond• and it does here- by waive notice of any such change, tatonsioh, alteration or — addition IN WITNESS VNEREOF, this lostrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on ItormOm 7I , S.• 4 • �r1oDer (Surety) , Or.n n- ac Caveat C. Bonsai PLEASE ATTACH POWER Of ATTORNEY TO ALL SOROS `R SIGNATURES/HU3r BE NOTARIZED Lg��� s fE!�r er Y�>•S ` -.•wrl .• ..A-- :Z�4`a ik a' f x SUBDIVISION - GUARANTEE NO PERFORMANCE (SETTING Of F1NAt MONUMENTS) i " City Council �. City of Aanc %o Cucamonga , P. 0. Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91750 rive Gentlemen: ' Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66197 of the Government ' Cod , undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the inal map of PM SIM are to be set and furnished by o to r er s :nq neer or surveyor on or 'r baler: 0saus" eel as specified in the Engle ar- s or' Surnyor f ertif 'T +[e a' gross to furnish the notes thereon to complete all engineering requirements specified r to Section of the Government Code. a 866497, of f LaS�_ ldo ems it, d nee use saldu deposit to g ra p D quart ate: Cast a menueencs will be set and the notes furnished as above provided on or before the date specified god that the engineer or surveyor will a A be paid by the undersigned ' It and agreed that in the rent the tart our onto re undera reigned falls complete the above dthte the city nga r, temp specified, the city o/ Rancho a of m Is Au be +ueaor/ad cost the said reobea nto Or Clefs then t0 bt completed hen to and the he Cott Is to be a charge author) cash deposit, a0. ,at dp i. i City of Ran of Rancho U authorized to foam the y transfer d cash de transfer from a1G ash deposit to the cunt for ao Groper city proper city fund . d T 1t Is further agreed that If the undersigned does not present evidence to the City t Conne[1 that has Past the en9ln mar or or e i annoyer for the setting of the final monuments, an0 It the surveyor giros the notices prescribed in nation 7eOf 66 66/97 h Code, Lee City snail Pay to seed enOtnar J the the ve for surveyor, the usb daDOS It he in cede C&INL 1, if the Cost of completing said •equframents exceeds the amount of the cash daDOf 1L. tee undersigned agrees to pay the difference F+ rftafC thin :y (S0) days after receiving written statement from the City of a.. ho Cucamonga specifying the &count of the differenco between the cash deposit and the actual cost o! feed requirements. { Cordially, Subdivider Address Date The depositor of record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit) shall be Issue) rem ..'i� NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED Potty FtttED OUT AND SIGNED tv. 1 ,Ab �E 30 RESOLUTION No. { vTa-m S6— W y A RESOLUTION OF THE • ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP WMBER 4498, •''= (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9498), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, " AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES . WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 9448, submitted by Rieter Rinker Gateway, and consisting of 5 parcels, located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Fourth Street, being a division of the south half of Lot 21, Lots 28 and 29, Section 13, Township 1 South, Range 7 west, map of Cucamonga Lands, as per map recorded 4n Book 4 of Maps Page 9, Records of the County of San Bernardino, State of California was approved by the Planning Commission of the City �f Rdnchc Cucamonga cn September 11, 1985; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 9498 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown an said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into au Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by R4eter Rinker Gateway as developer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of th3 City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that sate Parcel Map No. 9498 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for recnrd. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of December, 1985. AYES: NOES: r ABSENT: n 0. Mikels, Mayor ' --•,' may..., .: �/ '�.; �. R .t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON-A 0.3CAa STAFF REPORT ��%, $ _z' DATE: December 18, 1985 U 1 ' ism TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hub0s, City Engineer BY: Lind& Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Wrovement Agreement an4 Improvermt Security fcr Parcel Hap 9416 (CUP 8.1 -31) located on the northeast corner of Haven and Highland Avenues submitted by Diversified Properties III Ltd. Parcel Map 9416 was approved by the Planning Cocmission on November 27, 1985, for the division of 17.34 acres into 10 parcels in the Neighborhood Commercial Development District located on the northeast corner of Haven and Highland Avenues. The Developer, Diversified Properties III Ltd., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction u7 the off -site improvements for Parcels 1 thru 8 in the following amount: Faithful Performanco Bond: $134,000.00 Labor and Material Bend: $ 69,000.00 Also, an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of Master Plan Storm Drain Line 3H in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: S 53,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 5.26,580.00 A 'etter of spproval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. & R.s have also been approved by the City Attorney. REC0INMATIOM It is eCapprovingP�c Parcel Map a e Council adopt Map 9416, accepting sold agreements attached ree entsandsecurityutandd authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said map to record. 9 � R ctfully: 1 ted, Attachments I 5 �rro- M II v � I- �r r ..CITY OF PROJECT. Parce ,FANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE; +c +a :;ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT; ,33 I AteA'' Itl 'y 9416 ,.3% 4. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROTEMENT AGMLEMEN'f FOR i tW 9910/ Cur GLAI PARCUS 1 M 6 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: that this agreement is made and catered into, In eanforoance with tqa provisions of the MWfelpal Code and Regulations of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, Stab of California, A municipal corporation, hereinafter referr. ed to as the City. by and between said City And JO pt���tt3 �ss,riNT to paefnHter rotund to em tae ere ope -0� r. THAT. WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property In said City to ca tad MCMITH173T C l it HAr6O AND _HICMI.&9j AjM t and WHEREAS, said City has established Ckrt31n requirements to be mmt by Said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approve l; and WNE2EAS, the execution of this agreement and porting of taproveeant security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be egatvaleat to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, TP12EF2RE. it Is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1 The Developer hereby agree$ to caastruet at den taper's expense alt ImprevestAtf described on page a hereof within 12 zoatts from the date htvat /, 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of be resolution of the Council of said City toprovlog this agreement. This agreement •Ant be in default on the day follow. 1.T the first anatnrsarr, date of said approval amass am axtwa- fsom of tied has been grantr4 by said Sity as hereinafter provio_ ad. ,- The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement to writing not lets then JO dcYS prior to the default doe, cad ie elationy a fbteme vet of o /rcrostances of coca)sity for odd/tiomel time. 1n cpasldera- tlon Of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof. ,Including ca +.tract tee standards. cost estimate. wed sutficanty Of the amprevamedt secarlty And t0 regalre a:Jutbuts thereto when warranted by Substantla{ change ! tbrotn. a If the Oerelop :r falls or neglects to comply with I%* pronfloas at this a0nemut, the city $ball have the -flat at any time to cause told preH Slaves to be completed ba any tan. S fat pans, and thereupon to racanr from said Develops and /or his Surety the fall cost and expense incurred to so daing. S construction permits shall he ebtaiAnd by the Dan)- el oiler free the office of the City Engineer prior to start o/ my work within the public right -of -ray, cad tae developer shall contact fn fall { race row compliance witL the regulations contained therein, pee- coapliance may result to stepping of the cork by the Clty, and asses$aent of tae Penalties provided. �t d. Public right -of -ray Improvement work required shall "" be co.straeted to conformance with approved Improvement p)adt. "' lt' Standard Specifications. anczai and Drawings and gay $DCCPIA ,,rI. :1: '': _ S.f.. D.R.. Nu.. P.N..CW �� •,: Y- yZ� A aJ 1 �1 t t b` ameadmeets tbereto. Coastriction shall Include say transitions and /or other incidental wort deemed accessary for drainage- or psbllc ""'Y* Errors or conissisas discovered during coestruc. time that, be corrected coca the direction of the City _ Engineer. Revised wort dve to said plan modifications shall be covered by the pmvdfpds of this agremmt mad secured by the _ surely covering the original planned works. ' 7, Bart deal within existing streets shall be diltgeat. ly pursued to complettle; tse City $hall have the right to Cm plete any and all wort is the event if unjustified delay to Camaletica. and to recover all cost fad.atptosa Incurred front the Developer and /oe his contractor by any lawful means. S. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocations, or removal of my component of say Irrigation water system fa conflict with me noes rep wart to !At satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the waW syttm. 9. The 0evelops.• shall be responsible for removal of , all tease root and other debris from the public right -of Tray. 10. The Developer sball plant and malataia partway trees at directed by the Commonalty Development Director. 11. The LDrorment security to be furnished by the Developer to Isarantes completion of the terms of this &grossest shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The bria- ciool moucc of said Improvement security %ban act be lots than the mount $hewn: nvt(�tl6rvi� C I 1 PAITRFUL PERFORMANCE 7ypet Principal Asount: 1113C,000.00 Rue and address of surety: DEYBLOPER3 INSURANCE COMPANT 333 Wilshire, Anaheim, Ca 92801 MATERIAL AND LABOR Type: Principal Aaoontc 169,000.00 DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY Nave and address of suretyt 333 Wilshire. Anabsta, CA 928n1 CASY DEPOSIT MOIDIMERTATION Typal Principal Accent: Rand And Address of surety TO r. POSTED ThICR TO ACCEPTANCE BT THE CITl is a.TNESS HEREOF. the p+rttas hereto have caused these presents to he duly astute and acknowledge With all fumllities nV�Ir AO by 1'W oe t a dates u: forth opposite their signatures Oat.1 �4ZDT� by L —. Jereloper ! gna ure me Date by ,%%%/.sl� 0erelope- S gna urri e T,lNSO%t/e9eo - - -Trl clad —� Accepted: City of Rancho Cuctsonde, California A Municipal Corporation By: Mayor Alto$,. Approved: City Attorney _ OIVELOPER•S SIGNATURES MUST RE NOTARIZED , i J G9Est CITY OF GRp10 CWa[RGA EMIKEGIAG OI9ISIOA ORAOACIelM FGMIT FEE SCHME FM 1436 Pareale 1 . a Only Arem9 aid Iran A.. SOTCI Ows not Include son, t in for Waiting wait or paw t do osits ' DUAATIM (MIT 1TER PRICE ~T L.F. P.C.C. Curb - 12• C.F. 21• gutter 7.2s yy7_ L.F. P.C.C. Curb - d• C.F. 2/• gutter 6.00 L.F. F.C.C. curb oneF 5.50 9-s rw- �y_ L.F. A.C. bees 4.50 10.00 �1 S.F. a• F.C.C. sidevalk 1.75 H r-m s.F. Drlva approach 2.50 a s S.F. 8• F.C.C. Cross gutter (Inc. curb) 1.40 2190.00 C.T. Street aAawtion 1.50 - C.T. (sported wbanksalt 1.50 2S_ S.F. Preparation of subgra4 0.15 -'S�- 2y=y_ S.F (9.) Crushed 499. best (par Inch thick) IT ::isb� T04 A.C. o.er 1700 rant) 27.00 Tan A.C. 900 tc (SOD tool) 75.00 TON A.C. SM to 900 tons) 45.00 7T500.00 _80Q_ Ton A.C. under SOD tons) 60.00 _ S.F. A.C. 7• thick) O.SS - S.F. Patch A.C. (trench) 1.79 - S.F. 1• thick A.C. overlay 0.70 - G. Adjust sa sr urble TO grade 250. CO - EA. surer n Adjust er Cle out to grade 150.00 - G. Adjust rater whes to grads 75.00 EA. Sir' Itchts 1000.00 - St50.d- L.F . Farrleadai (Interaec. 5500 sin) 1.00 L.P. 2 a a• redWOad header 1.15 1sw S.F. Rew al of A.C. vin,ment 0.75 L.F. Raoval of P.C.C. curb 1.70 79. L.I. km &I of A.C. bars 1.00 -109'55 - _ EA. Street signs 200.00 - Fit Reflectors and Posts 75.00 L.F. Concrete black W411 25.00 -- S.F. Retaining Wall 20.00 TOX Aggregate base 7.00 C.T. Concrete structures 425.00 l.F. " RCP (2000 D) 29.00 • L.F. 2Y RCP (1500 D) 75.M - L.F. 16• RE.P (12000 0 49.00 L.:. a8• RCP 1200 0 16.00 - G. Catch basin V • 4• 2000.00 - G. Catch basin g • 8• 2900.00 - U. Catch balm g • T• 4SOO.CO --- EA. Loral deFreulon 4• 500.00 - -- G. Local 4epn"fee, U. 1000.0) - G. Junction structure 5000.[0 G. Outlet structure. Std #506 MOM - EA. Outlet structure. Ste 0507 500.00 -� G. Guard posts 40.00 L.F. Guard panel (trod) 25.00 1g� L.F. S&Wcut 2.00 59i n.00 G. Headwall (a6• Wing) 4000.00 -- L.F. Redwood header 1.75 ' }gpL ' S.F. L.F. Landscapt, L Irrigation Roll Curb (P.C.C.) 2.75 7.50 IZ3S8�- 7723 -� pr � talc. A.C. Meta, 130 �77Z0 -- al 4. etc9at Tre9a 75.00 1130.0 , ' E116IREERIIIG WEE AR FEE SUR TOTAL 17055A og_. • eAESTfwAT10ND[LICG'Ile% CAL( _ [OIffIRGFNC'/ COSTS llsa1 7ibS6:8S- OEPOSIT (RUwDAeu FA M AN vA71.7AACE ^ORO (1005) lle0on.ao 1[nInEMTATION RAM '[,AS.) 1A80R ND :Nls,'i • MO (ms) s9aco.00 . y' eFaraakot to City of Rancho Ctcmg4 rwelpal Coda. Title 1. Chapter 1.08. -ad2ptinp'Sn Ilerecrdlm Cantu Code Mies. MOTORS 14, a alb restorAILIM/dellmales deposit shell ' • be Made Prior to Issuaen of wa / Eallneacin9 Ctastruct IN P"t. _ �u - i ballad 1184 V � v ?. 5 i STATE Or CALIIONIIIA ) an. COUNTY Or CRAMM On the a' day of lkatu44/ . Z� 1985 bfare ee, the undersigned, a Notary Public in end for a. State, personally appeared JOMI S O')QAEA, ye: eaoal3Y Jaovn to se for proved to se on the basis of ucieLetory evidence) to be the paraeO viw executed ohs vithln Snetraaant as one of the general partner* of DIg=1rIED PROPERTUS COMANY It, a Central Partner of DIVEESIrIM PEOPESYIES CO.VPANY III. a California Baited partnership. the partnership that axe. cuted the vitbia lnetrvaut, and aetmavledged to ae that such Partaerahip executed the care. WITMS V hag! and official Goal o.nd... • ® .11.(C A� vi {W oa�wt Not., aoterr recite ! (Gas / S^J.IE OY =%uramth ) �• re. C^.IDRY or O(ey�P'�M6 ) + In . - �• on the N, the uMatal der No N&W A 1 w . lsa before •Notary Pub ie So end er said state, POTSOMILY eppearrd ILthe E. DEf appeared personally ne .. sA (er pr person to vh m the basis o{ un 1112tus evidence) to evidence) be the paraeo vho the iartrusant one of r ers of OPAPE the general yfetearG of Sits ORAPEA PAMtLY VENNAfS, a r Celifern /a Halted partnership, a Central Partner of DIVE8.9IPIID PAOPE'TIES COMPANY 13, a Central PArtoor of DIVLSS IPIm 1'S IMICS CCMPAtrr III, a California leashed Partnership, the partnership that executed the ithin lnatrtaoent, and acknovledgtd to ru that such yartOerebip executed the aeae. MI11IfSS sY hand and official seal. :�:. tea:. l>•YAtn r. t %fie.),) . / � i gees �,a eterP rue to eer�.,.�.r� •a�w Isut) — i aY : L.. Bond So: 9169653 preeliimt 8,380.00 FAITNFUt. PERFORNAICE 0000 UNERIAS, the City Council of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga. Slate of Celifornl, and DIVERSIFIED PROPCATIES COMPART tfi the r:,.after d•tignate4 as °Dr mcipa a•a enlar to Into a¢ toreanmt whcr by Principal agrees to fns III and complete ceI�an off l9nttad public teDrovemeeas, whlci' said a9rrtpint, ,•� Coatld 199 and Irrrrifled at prdJec[ PM 0.161 [DP _ - - _ — If 1il r Ldy rtfe —tf to and made A Dar[ ntreaf;ma, MNEREAS, said arincipil is reaulred order tM terms 3f laid agreement to furnish a band for the is thful parlormanct of said agreement MOV, TNERIFORE, we the principal andDEVELOPERS IM UR ANY as surety. are bald and firmly bound unto the ittl Of XanCnO Cucamonga (hereinafter 581134 •City %). in the panel $ud of U I -w` Igj�wNNn�ano M61100 Ool lafi aw[YI - - -wy of the unitaa ales, ,a• Lne payment of YnIC'1 fYm Yfll and truly :: be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, Successor%, executors and aLSiniltratofs, Jointly Rod severally, firmly by these presents The condition of this obllo•Lion Is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its Refrf, titcrtort, ad3inlitratorf, 10 CCtfaore Or assigns, Shall In all things stand to and abide bye end well and truly keg and perform the covenants, Canditfpnt and provisions in the said agraseant and any alteratlor thereof miff as therein pruvldtd, on his or their part, to be kept and p rfdrmed at the time and in the manner therein Sp4C MVA, and 10 all rts:ects OcCordfdg to their true Intent and Retain], and shall indemnify and save harmless City Its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall becone hall and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain 1n full forte and effect As a part of the ablfg 4tion secured hereby and in addition to the face anaunt snecifted therefor, there %hall be included costs Ind r#&%enable ezvenses and fees, lncl"ing ranspa able attorney's fees, incurred by City In successfully anforcfng such pill l lesion. --� all to be taxed ss costs and included In any Judgment randertd The surety hereby ttlputatls and agrees that no change. extension of time, alterstlun or addition to the term of the I agreement or to the work to be performed Hereunder o- the tpe:i- flca me tion% acCpanying Ht same shall in tnywise affect ltt - d obligations on this bond, and it doe$ hereby valve ratite of any S mch change, extension of tilt, alteralien or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications, IM MITMCSS WHEREOF, this Instrument has been duly executed by Ia the principal and surety above named, on 4 199'_. DIYMUnED PROPERTIES C"Ar III e ' Callrarr" Limited Partnership : DIYER[I.'TFD P J767'1:� r .Tam urey ill i Callrorni• General Partrarphlp _ Rjt. 9nature ttor nq-In- act 1 O'llears, Owrml farther Aerie C. danfar 4• A } +t amt CPAPA FuRiy , ,t tPerwv ea' yy. Aasp� :: ' Bond No: 9169655 Premlun loot in pert " WON AND NATERIALMEN BOND NNEREAL the City COUncil Of the Clty of Rancho Cuumongis State of California. and DIVEASlrIED PPOpCRtSES COePA :lI111L� Inert Ind ter designated n Dr nctpa ' are entered into m agree Rant :hereby principal Agrees to which lt +ld dt9rae�mL certaln do ignited Dablic IsOrov<s ants 19! , and btrtifted dated ---- 1Treby •Trr ad to and side al ed ut -- a dart nu eo a��- NMEREAS. under the terms of sold akreement, pr 1ACIPAI It 91 required reform ahterlog upon the perforaeeu of the wort, to file a good and scf iciest payment bond .tth the City of Rancho CucamOnq a to Secure LM Claim, t0 which rtre,s,ce is mAd* in flat e 1S (comencing with Sutton 20!21 of Part a at Division 2 of the civil Code of the State of California NOV, TMEREfDtEe said principal and one undersigned IS a corporate surety. are hold firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cuc page end all contractors, subcontractors, llaborers. m oebrlllsee and other persons employed In the parform.Arr of the aforesaid agreement and referred to In 01 aforesaid Code of Clvti Procedure in the sum of SIXTY NINE TNQUSAND AMD 1Lr100 Dollars (S for inter • s •ruts a or aOtr t Argun of any clad or or +scents due under the U"ePICYPInt Insurance Act with respect to Such work 01 lm bar, that said slat} rs11 pay ins Saxe en an amount not exceeding the ImOYnt hllft"bO'* Set forth, tad aISO In use Suit is brrpIII upon this bond will pal In as addition to the fice arount thereof, costs and reonable I.Pa m as and fees. Including reasonable Attorney's fees, Inc ur rep by City in access fully enforcing such obligation, , De auardtI and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs And to be Included In the Judgment therein rindcred It Is hereby expressly stlpUlateo and agreed ores , that this, boad Shall IAUre to the behefit of any and all corporations entitled to If 1e claims under lltle 15 (COmmcnClA9 with section 2!821 of Part a of Divis.n I of the C wil Cad e• so as t0 give • rigqht of action to ends or their +Hill" I,. any Cult brougnt upon to la bond Should the condition of this bond be fully performed than this Obllq atlon Shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and resale to Iull farce and t /fact The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, agreement or the specifications accompanying the suns shall a in ea} .await affect its obligation$ on th'S bond. Ind it does here- by :awe notice of any sucn change, extension, alteration or tddlttdn. the nM IntlpelS A W"Elt '!1 eytabowinstrument naned �oe n...�b.rdu; ] executed by 198,5_. DIVERSIFIED PROET]R°.ES G]VALY III . A California Llnitsd Partnership R� DIVMI?IED PROPEXTIES C)"AN} II, A California General Partnarship nryr��paa�Ly� fat ra O,,DIIer--�� \ YrR[7 9natur� �forne— y —ln-C� Jet i O'Ilasre, Calitusl Partner Delia C. Isarer BS CR&M I&= 90RURa. e n Ca forme Limited partnership e} 'V. Genera- f 'nrar r SUtgI915I0n �, GUARANTEE AO OE ' (iCTTino Or lnAL MONUMENTS) � ry r ry. City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga F. 0 sex to7 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 �f FI' Gentl camas turtuant to Chapter 4. Article 9, Section 66497 of the oosvnetnt i� Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shorn on w the final map of an Ails are to be set and furnished by t sat r er 7 rogluur or surveyor on or before rnewe tame , as spa clfied to the Engineers er uneyor s ere date am agrees to furnish the notes thereon to comp Lee all engineering requirements specified e in Section 66497, of the Government Code. The eadertlqq"I hands YOU hertwi)? the fun of S 1 lm that as a Cato deposit, said deposit it guarantee a monuments rill be set and the notes furnghed as above providri an or before the data spa:ifted and that the engineer or surveyor will .. be paid by the undtrsl:ned It is further nnderstood and agreed that In the event the undersigneJ falls to complete the above requirements within the time specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to complete said requirements or cause this to be completed and the - cost thereof it to be a charge against said cash deposit• and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Is authorized tc mate the necessary transfer from said cash devout to tot credit for the proper city fund. It is further agreed that if the undersigned does not present @Video's to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments. and if the ti Inner or surveyor gtres the notices prescribed U section - �1. 64/97 of the Government Cede• the City shell pay to sold engineer or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made. . :' f the -oat of completing said requirements exceeds the emoant of '•,i• the cash deoosit thr undersigned agrees to pay the difference ' within thirty (Sb) days after receiving writtu statement from the City of Rancho Cecaoonga ssecif)ing th.. amount of the e... difference between the Cash deposit an A the ictual cost of slid •• requirement%. t, Cordially. Z pLnlftd fraommtn clan.' Itt Subdivider ~ nto And mill awun, elm Address p,an ma... Wifamla 97676 � Oats oranee r a lees t, The d of record (tor return or ay portion of the cash a �i l be tyy deposit) it) shall pternml[lee e.ep.rtta, aryaer cal, . 2910 tad wt a.eow: sloe Cel'rol.r stated Wrrti a 1 co yr pari.arsIA inoper[S•r Camaar it, a rasa 4 A Catlfanla 9emeeal paetaerentp FILLED SIGNED �,y v 1: ' y, e. gar matt•• vaetmu, t OUT AND r• bufernL 1Litad p•n y 's�.Fk! - ..... •• _ fship 'e �,: ••.♦„ r� %�noey i%braArr r ciy ♦"�`•: ., Cawfat rartaar - - ;Y,r• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IVAOYERENT ACREEIIEAT FOR t �„ ;1 �W LiNS 3 N Ri gel " E404 ALL NEh BY THESE rRESENTS: That this agreement Is made and entered Into. In aonformnce with the prorhtu,.s of the Hanielp0 fade ems Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. St atw o1 California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter refarr- ed to es the City. by &Ad between said city And DIT=RED PROPERTIES O"ANY ITT hereinafter referred to as the—iR user TWAT. WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property In said City located NOMYFAST C0FW Or NtTEN AND wrnrt alma 11= i and WHEREAS, said City has established certain regairenemts to be not by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS, the execatien of this agreement end posting of Improvement iscurlty as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorrey. an waned to be equivalent to prior comolatlon of said requlrseents for the purpose of securing sold appruval. AOV. THEREFOR:, it Is hereby agreed by and between the City and it* orvaloper as fo,loms: 1 The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developers expense all Improvements described on page A hereof vitnln 12 months from the date hereof 2 This agreement snail be affective on the date of the resnlution of the Council of said City approving this &rreemant. This agreement shall be to default on the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an siten- sion of time ban been granted by said City is hwreimefter provid- ed b Public right -of -way Improvement work required shalt be constructed in conformance with approved Improvement plant, Standard Specifications, and- Wandard Cravings and sty special -1- .�! S.F.. O.L. Res.. P.✓ ,CUP Ir S The Developer may request Additl nit time In which to complete the provision& of this agreement in writing not leas than TO days including lVt ' prior to the default date, and a Ste of clrcamstancef of necessity Ior additional time In considera- tion of fuel request, the City reserves the rfgbt to review the ' provisions hereof, including construction standards, test t estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by suestantlal changes there In. ' e, if the Developer falls or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement. the City shall have the right at any tine to cause sold provisions to be completed by any law. _ sal suns• and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the fall cost and expense Incurred in so doing , S. Construction peralts shat', be obtained by the Devel- oper from the office of the City Engineer prior to start or an work within the public right -of -way. and the developer %hall - y conduct such work In full compliance with the regulation% contained therein Non - compliance say result In stopping of the t; work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. b Public right -of -way Improvement work required shalt be constructed in conformance with approved Improvement plant, Standard Specifications, and- Wandard Cravings and sty special -1- .�! S.F.. O.L. Res.. P.✓ ,CUP Ir i L 0 41-A � d i ctagl `�, 1 ii �' -. • ••• .• •.:- K...'+.�6e+w^ 45P C r1 11 v' f li 4 vy aeendeents thereto. Coastractfan %hall inctude any trattitipns ' aed /or other tntidaatAI wort doomed nteassary for drainage or 0ubIle safety. Error% or omissions dlacofared du.log t ostrdc. _ floe shall be corrected upon the directlan of it* City Englnaor. Eevised work due to said plan modlflcationt fhali be covered by the provisions of this agreement and steered by tke surety covering the Original planned works. 7. tort done within existing streets (bell be d'•ligent. Iy pursued to ebnpittlonl the City shall have tae right to Complete any and all work in the event Of unjustified Coley In Comol all .0 and to recover all Cost and expense tocfrrtd erom the ' Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful cans 0 The navaloptt shall be responsible for replicament. relocations, or removal of any component of any irr 1patinn water SY too IO conflict with the XCgUired work to too :at sh elan of Re City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. the Devwloper soall be responsible for rVeaval Of all loose reek and other debris from the public right-of-way. 10. The Oevelopor shtll plant and maintain parkway - trees as eirocted by the Comanity Development Director I1. The HDrorement security tw he fern /sha7 by the Developer to guarantee Complatl an of the terms of this sgrmawant Shell be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. the prig. cipal amount of said teprovenant %OCUrity shall pat be INS than the "Dent showmt i L 0 41-A � d i ctagl `�, 1 ii �' -. • ••• .• •.:- K...'+.�6e+w^ 45P 1 Been , FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Mount: 153,000.00 Name end address of surety: DMLOPR5 INSURANCE COMPANY 333 Wlsl:lM. Anaheim, Ca 92801 MATERIAL AND LABOR Typal Principal Mount: d26,500.00 Name and address Of surety: DEVELOPERS INSURVCE OCHPARI 333 WIIa1LLre, Anaheim, Cm WOO CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATtOM Type: Principal Mount: Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE IT THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOFo the parties hereto have Caused these presants to be duly mae<Ytad and acknowledge with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth _ opposite shell signatures. Dato9IMS- 102-5 by S J Developer 1 ni YI• �oPrrvv PH ..Yp1r r me Date e, S.IsJp,[Dy s, 6>R�� Developer / gnaws TNN prialso Accerted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation By: Mayor Attest: city Clark Approved: City Attorney DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED I STATE OF CALIIOR:IIA ) COUNTY Or ORA1103 aa• On the �L day of �ur(„i�,� 198S before ea. the vnder•SQn•d. a Notary Perm Sc 1., and tot said State. P* 0OAIIY npPeared JOHN S 04DUJtt, personally know to as (or proved to re an the basis of eat .factory evidence) to be the parsen uho executed the vithis Instrument as one of the general partners of DIVERSIFIED VACPLATIES COEPANY 1I. General Partnee of DIVERSIFIED FROPDD'IES CCIRAIR III, M California limited partnarshiD, the partaarshlp that axe - "red the Within instrumento and atknevle49ed to as that such Darcmerehap executed the aaa WITNESS my band and official seal, onaw eu / iuTwl CASDIpY Rour7 sae ae (light) �+�acrreor aewrwean LTATE OF CALIRRWIA) L a. GOU.`TT OP O1W1f3 ) , ee. On the day of 198}, before [ fined, A fttir—yf7b se In and for said State, personally ap('.Yared RMDNEY R. OMER, personally hover to we (er prwed to m M the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be tL• psraen who uecuGd the vlthin Ln•trw.eat a one of the 9uaaJ Dartiva eL TIE DRAPrR FAMILY VENTURES, s California lialCed p+rtnerahlp, a General Partner of DIVERSt[IID TAOPCR71L9 COMPACT II, a Oeneral Partner of DIVERSIFIED MOPMTtES COMPANY Ili, a C+Ilteraia limited ' Partnership. the partnership that executed the vAthin instrVmat, and acknowledged to a that such partnership executed the sae. WITNESS wl hand and Officiall� �.Mail. n ,r waiiMmem 7�dlLl.tl. C�7lryLi oncr e[Y wuq em av MTALIE GSSIOY CawrOewV.A NC��Iw.rr.i Mt 1 ,, h J '} 1 � � a t• _ • [aclerarAG IAi9ECrra ra • eIIFSialltr1011/D0.IXFATIax m Tarn r' eo.s7s.ob ' 't CATd OFPoSIT COerI11GEMr COSTS tp.ses.DO �� fngESt (E[iMWeLE t10NQi1rATIW SlW[IT �CASNj rAnVM PEArOVIAME No 100% ' UM AND INTEAIAL "m (SOE) 1 CITY OF U.10I0 CLXAMDWA +" ' EIIGIDEEAISG DIy1S10o _ Nersftnt to city, of R&KtO txaonga NwltipaT EDde, Ti SY ete t. sft Ing Mr+ur6lee Eaoty, Cddf Titles, mis9 1.5, a oth nstoriti /al r tltl, 'bit - E111CRDACI M PWIT FIE SMIXV A.E It 9 Cmztruttitn hratt. Mee}l't(sLl ��;..r':'•; ilefur rtu stun nnln Um U For tf,Ir m.1ti 0l..nlon n A1tA t Wl. 't ., Data. n. , 2d7...S" - -Gc.— t—EC rd— rllf ATences V. n r.ia /0.e et- City Drawing er NOTE: Dots not lalda current in for i rlttag quit or pareten. oepmlts i On". rbu. ti 1¢v.wnu will be revlyd to On ooiuCUted in 11. of fWS. i - t.tror is if tMf b.r. b..n wit by .Wt , d.e.lo7trot. I..1tMr „ .mot orm.tlnn of N. Al" lsa u.tw m taw. utLf.ctlm of 11. city r tarn Ncsoe..d a" b.rneNln county flops G otml Dirtrict aw rev .d Is i.uned m be cowered to cntt.., q m.te nud b.lne. suv u. se... i uttn.0 loop sat 42.378.00 _ • [aclerarAG IAi9ECrra ra • eIIFSialltr1011/D0.IXFATIax m Tarn r' eo.s7s.ob ' 't CATd OFPoSIT COerI11GEMr COSTS tp.ses.DO �� (E[iMWeLE t10NQi1rATIW SlW[IT �CASNj rAnVM PEArOVIAME No 100% ' UM AND INTEAIAL "m (SOE) 1 ,le•i'., . Nersftnt to city, of R&KtO txaonga NwltipaT EDde, Ti SY ete t. sft Ing Mr+ur6lee Eaoty, Cddf Titles, mis9 1.5, a oth nstoriti /al r tltl, 'bit ."'ri„vrV .:. • meff 9rly to ttsafate of as Enginterleg _ i It 9 Cmztruttitn hratt. Mee}l't(sLl ��;..r':'•; �IleritW LN.i .. A y 7-10 «r a ... ,2•iax`-'Y,'Aj•C'(JwCs "• n•rt h.•: n16a66:. Prrmlumt idaR.OL FAITHFUL PERFORHA7CE Bode 14407EA PLAN STORH PRATO LIVE S H VHEREPS, the City Council of the City of Ranch, COctmemga, State of California, and w1n (herein Aft*. dWil.Ateo of `Dnn['D Ii- nave Instead into in age last" whereby Pr11100a1 •gees$ to Install Ld couplets C ' calm de sfgnated public Itpro•e,eati, which said Ijreertet dated 194 and (dart' fled n p mite tb O11 hLCIP AO 11 If nertay rtf errs$ :a add 0440 t part nere�nc - UMEREAS, feid principal is required under the terns Of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performawct of Sall agreement AOV. THEREFORt• we the prlACleAI ono n as surety are h_10 Ld firmly bound MO the city or ancnn Coc amoegy (hers$narter pl led •LI•p•I, lathe penal sum of iikkA�--w� DoT=ss �iyU evict mol nej o� tee n1t e0 a4r�ar the Payment o .ten sum well and truly to be ■add, we bled our el.4% our h fief, successors, .•*tutors aad •dm'e's[ralars, jointly and severallye IS mly by these presents The Clnditlun of this obligation If such that It the Abera bounded principal, his or fit heirs, *:*colors, administrators. successors or assege•, she is In all th•ng1 staid to add abide by, one wri. and truly life antl plJ /ore the Corelsnts, c40d1tfonf aad Pro Oil In the said Agreement and amy alteration thereof roads as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept And pert armed at the tied and In the canner therein lleciHtd, and in all respects accordlag to Heir Hoe Intent n'd meanln9, sa6 slid 11 Indennff♦ and Lee harmless City. its offlcerf agents aco employees, as therein stipulated, then this Obligation shell become null ens •old; Otharwltt, It shall be and remits in full lured and effect AS A part of the Wig Ition secures hereby old In addition to the fact ie0unt specifics therefor, thin Shall be Included casts and reasonable expenses one fees, Incloetng relt303ble attorney's fits, Ineurrtd by Clty In succassfully enforcing Such obligation, all to be to ed as coati and Included in any judgment rtndared, The Surety here0I� sti pulatn am agrees that no change• a aten3lon of elm*. al4ratfan A. aeeltlon to the terms of the agrttmeat or to the wort to to parforntd thereunder or the %pact. ficti'ans accompanying the ram* all In anywise affect Its oblllitlOns on this bond. end -t •'o,s beraby Aire notice of any 4 Such change, on it es son of ties, Alteration or addition to the V teens of the agreement Or to the lark ar t0 the specification,. IN VITNESS VVEPEOF, this Ins•rument has been duly executed by ' to* —. principal and surety above .Amid. 00 DEC[tm IN A DIVMUP= P,IPCRTIES CCVAHT III,a CallralUa Limited Fortner?1p are opu urory Ca1lCareL GaAeral Partrerahtp ..: �L qn .urn to —nej. llast o P'ekars, re0atm1 Partner rated.d C. Gayer In't GAPER FAMILT T9fiUM, a 'r rota Liftlept PortzerahlP q wrft,v7. , M,179 �� LADOR AND HATERIALIIEN BOND dons N.: 9169603 Pr amlum. Idol In rerruraanas HASTEN PLAL SE0111 DRAIN LINE 3 H WHEREAS, the City Council Of the City Of Raedhe Cucamonga, State of Cal lfor[ u, and (herelnaftar et119.1ted as pr nc pa are enters Into an agreement Whereby principal agrees to Iescall and Godplett Certain designated pub:,c Improvements. Which sold agreamP t, dated , 198 and identifies as pro act • /CUP 3: �Is hereby re t rtd to and made a part hereof; a -- WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is rlqulred before entering upon the performance of the Wort, to file a Bead and sufficient paynent bond W,V he City Of Rhncho COcmangl re secure lme claim$ t0 which reference if .&de in 71.1e IS (commencing With Section 3032) of Part t of Division I Of the Civil Code of the State of California NOV. THEREFORE, said principal and the Snae• signed As A co'porato surety Are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho CV; nanya and all Contractors, subcontractors, laborers, dater Ulan and other persons employed In the performance of the aforesaid agree me. and referred to In the aforesaid Code of M I pro CIf sure In tae sub of TWhNTT SIT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED Dollars (S°a SOD 00) for mater a s urnis • or apOF tner :nn Of any tine, Or' or av0unts due under the Unemployyent Insurance Act With respect to such Wort or labor, that $aid surety will pay the fame In an &vaunt not exceeding the amount harelnaba,e set forth, and assn In cast suit is brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the fate Amount thereof, Gosts and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attOrnt) s fees, Incurred by City In successfully enforcing such obligation to be awarded and fixed by the court and to be taxed as Cott, and to be Itcluded In the judgment thtraln rendered it IS hereby expressly stipulated and all,aed that this bond shall Inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Tolle IS (commencing wit Section 3082) of Part C of DI 1,;1 3 of the CI v11 Coda, so as to give & right of action to the. .r their Asslgnl In any suit brought upon this bond Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this Obligation shall became null and void, otherwise It shall be And remain In full force and effect The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, est i,slcn of Live, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanyinq the same shall in '• any manner of Hct its obligations on this bind, and It does her:. oy wire notice of any such change, :+tans Ion, alteration or addition ,IIN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Insb anent has been duly executed by its r acips/ and surety above named, on December b , D3YU FLED PAOPearm @BAN, III.& Gllforna Llaltod nrtnergl..p a ET: DItOSTPTED P:- CIRIES COMPANY II,a D hllforn.L. Casa' Pertaershtp OClTTGPFRS IPSiR1AYCE COMPATT r era apv u're ty isignsourvi P/ �,IMn OFAMIL , ENxlml Partner David C. barer T. E,I DIAPER PNQLT Ytin11m.3, . T. �y nufl.vla LlswlteAftreheMlp TE RESIT (ION NO.- -lr�sa -cae A RESOLUTION OF r,e CITY CGJNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO = CUCAMANGA, CAL1FrAHIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUM9ER 9416, (TENTATIYE PARU 141P No. 9416), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES WHEREAS, Tent tiv. Parcel Map No. 9416, submitted by Diversified Properties III Ltd., lad ci asisting of 10 parcels, located on the northeast corner of Haven and HiSNIanI Avenues, being a division of a portion of Parcel 1 el Parcel Map 7264, M v map record in Book 81, Pages 62 and 63 of Parcel Maos, Records of San Bern dino County was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 27, 1985; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 9416 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established rs prerequisite to aoproval of the final map by the City Council of said Ci'y have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable improveoent Security by Diversified Properties III Ltd. as developer. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Californta, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map No. 9416 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer 1s authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of December, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: A. .Ton D. Mikels, Mayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 18, 1985 X77 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Lien Agreement for Parcel Map 9318 located on the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Seventh Street submitted by Hartin Marietta Corp. Parcel Map 9318 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 25,1985, for the dlvis'on of 8.59 acres into 2 parcels to the Industrial Specific Plan Development District located on the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Seventh Street. The Developer, Martin Marietta Cr--p., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the coiw.euction or the off -site improvements in Vie following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 557,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $28,500.00 A 1Ltter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Mater District and C. C. & R.s have been approvM by the City Attorney. RECOM IIDATION It is recommended that the City Ccuncil adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 9318, accepting sa,d agreement security and liar, agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said mar to re.crd and lien agreement to rctord. Re Wy toed, c r Ottachments VICINITY MAP Nrs ,E-1 C:5 i1 y 4 CITY OF PROJECT Parcel Map 9318 k ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA T'-LE: V +c +n+ty pip' = .- ENGINEERING DIVISION S EXHIBIT; : :410 '•.IR Am ?'y'.- ',.,.t #� �Rej•yY„"..- ys. .r.da`. �!" t .s.a•.ti..• -tws Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40116A IRFROURENT ACRCEREIT FOR FM glib KNOW ALL HER BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agqreement Is asdt and entered Into. In conformance with the Provittohs Of the xuniciptl Cede and Regulations Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referr• ed to as the City, by and be those said city and A.R. ' Martatts Ccrpprati4m hereinafter referred to as ,So ajar TXAT, YNfNEAS, eafd OneIcoar desires to =I.VP certain real props"'; I, raid Clty letated on eta eart MSt corner Of Wren Are and seventh street t and YNEREAS, said city has established certain requirements is be aft by sold Developer AS PrermewtsltS to greeting of final sp,,ruvatg and YNEREAS, the execution of this agqreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the e1'y A'tdrfey. arc dewed to Oe equivalent to Orlor ceapletloe Of told reeve lrmenta for the purpose of mecurifp sa td e00rav al. NOV. THEREFORE. it Is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer at follows: 1, The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's tapeose all improvements described On past a hereof within 12 months from the date hereof. 2. This agreement %hall be effective On the dal' of the resolution of the CouN+l of said City approving this ssreaeont, This agreement shall be in default on the day follow - leg the first anniversary date of said approval anlett am eaten- at" of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed ] Thq Developer may request additional time In which to coeolete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not last :•ro 30 days Orfar to the default date, and lnclwdin9y a Statement Of ♦Irta1SZL.CQS Of necessity for additional tier 1n Centlder a• tion If Inch rtgxe%t, the City reserves the right to review the Irails not hereof. Including construction standards, cost attlmete• and sufficiency Of the tapronment security ' to chang require adjustments thereto when warranted by subst.ntlo ds tbareln. q. If the Developer falls or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreaent, the city %halt hen to@ right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any law• fat means, and thereupon to recover fro% said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense Incerrad in so doing. S. Construction permits %hall be obtained by the Devel- oper from the office of the City Eaginser prior to start of an wore (thin the public right -of -way, and the developer $bell conduct tech wort in full compliance with the regaletlens Cent Mmed tbertle. Ron - compliance mey rasalt fe stopping of the war, by the City. add assessment of the penalties provided. d. Public ri ht -of -way improvement wort required shall be coestructed In conforunce with approved Improvement ;tent, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special - Martin Marietta Corporation " 1,7 6dOt Rockledge M.. Seth:;.:: AD 20:17 AF.. 0 .R.. at.. v.x..wP ;: e r' • 5. amondmedts thereto Cemstryction shall Include say transltfonS• and /or other Incidental meet doomed necessary for drainage or -, Ecorrectedom Ind Orofa ft time Shall he Opoe 0 the Erectles theCll/ rapine or. gerised work dun to said plan sod Nlcatlena Nall It ..{ covered by the provisions of this agraemant and amcvred by tae svrdty covering the original planned weeks. T. York done within existing streets s -ill be diligamt- ly Versved to coepletlae; the City •hall nett the right to cpeptep any •and all pork In the event of unjust.' d Way is completion, and to eeeover all cost ano expense incurred from the Developar and /or Me contractor by any lawful Meant. S. The Developer %ball be responsible for repla_uent. relocations, or removal of any component of any Irrlyyatlon water System In conflict ilh the required were to the fatiffactton of the City Engineer and the over of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris from the pralic f19hp0( -w4y. 10. The Developer Shall plant and maintain parkway trees is directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The leproeennt security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the tern of tkl% agreement shall be subject so the approval of the City Attorney. Tee prim opal leeent of %aid improvement security shall not be Iefs than the amount shown: ;a' .rr A' yyT R ,Y1 1 v- -y iM FAtTMFUL PERFORMANCE Type Principal Amount: SIAM Mahe and address of surety - RATENIAt A•- :;,808 TyPa: Principal Amount: 25,500 X442 and address of strati CAS4 0170SIT ROMUNEMTATION Types Principal Amount: I.ZOD Baas slip address of lovely In BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEevAMCE By THE CITY 17 vITAE'.S OIREOF, tie par hereto have caused that* presents to be duly a lid a noel. • with all foraslitlet r1qusrey by law ca tN dais a r�NV d�p lee their signatures Dite Aav f 22, lCd3b , Developer gn,ture Rdbvrt p, Mwll• 2r. _ printed Oats 02 Gevvloper — Sig-at n —'T ntei �— Accepted City of Re-,Cho C.Cssmnsa California A Nun lc ipaI C'r0oratidn BY: Na, or Attest _ . ty er• ADprO•*d. 1TiY�i pi rnej _— OtTtLOPER'S S,GNAtUAES MUST 0E NOTARIZED -3. WIM011,. .t raAaa� , J EACEst -ITT 07 RARCIO CUCAWVy ENGINEERING OIVISlON - OIGDAOMXT PMT FEE SOME For IrpScvtr4t. %1 9318 Partin Wrletta Cmodratlon •Oatr:�.1(1M.P. I r A; r rorron f1U a ernn: sry. rClty its* tq _ {and wi�Ei��i nor In_leet arrest fee for _ -- kr:ttng Ptrunt x pevtent &iositl 0 Own;" 3RIIT 111,41 F0.itt AIgINT L.F. I.C.C. curb - 12• C,F 21• putter 7.2S L.F. P.0 C. Curb - 8• C.F. 2N putter 6.00 Cr F.C.C. curb Orly S,SO y.nen - L.F. A.C. ben 4.5,0 - - -- S.F 1* I.C.L. sldewalk 1.75 M-.M-w 41 E.F. Drive approach 2.50 itl , T I. 8• F.I.C. CroCs 9Rter (Ina, curb) 3,10 C.T. Street t vrtion 1,'A �- QT IportM taip,bent 1.50 S.f. PnPArAtla Of subprade 0,15 S.E. Crashed app. base tiler Intl thicl) 0.01 -. TOA A.C. ear 1300 tons) 22,00 •m o• TO-1 A.C. 900 to 1100 tons) 15.00 - -- 70A F.C. $00 to 900 tons) af.00 TOY A.C. under 500 tons) 60.70 S.F. A.C. 3• thick) 0 SS - S.F. Patch A.C. (trench) 1.75 S.F. I• thick AX CvcrlAy 0,70 �_rr G. Adjust sewer eanhole to grade •SO,M �JSCaoL EA. Adjust stwlr clean at to prat 150.00 G. Adjust water valves to grade 75,00 G. Street 11SAtt 1000,00 Sareleldei (Intersec. SSOO min) 1,00 L.F 2 a A* rphwod Mader 175 JAS_ '.F. RU0,11 of A.C. Pav~t 0.3S L.F. Rpxval 41 F.C.C. curb 2,10 L.F RMVAI of A.C. ben 1.00 _a° to [A, Street signs 100.00 G. Refltitcrs and pcsts 3S,D0 L.F Concrete block wall 25.00 S.F Retaining wall 20.00 TM Aggngne Oast 7,00 C.T. Connate structwes 425,00 L.r JR. RCF 1000 0 29.00 -� L.F. V• 2C 150] 0 15.00 L.r. 36' RC/ 20M 0 a9.07 L.F 16• W.7 1205 D 7d,00 FA. Catty b 200D.00 E1. Catch 2900 00 EA, Catch 4501 00 __ G. Local Sno.M assn V • A• basin V • 8' basin V • 22- dtpreSSIM a- de"cislon 12' on structure structure, Std JIM structure, Std #507 Patti pool (uwl) it (48• Wino) 1.112.15._ urnctolNd INVECTIM FEE 2 6 SU6 TOTAL SLUL7n • AVITCRAT1O9/O[L1sGTIjM CASH —1.0�m -- COttINSErIT COST ^ - �S 11l���_�7'1 W.31 RTATIM SIOFTTE(CM l) fA11101R rGFORVAACF IM (IfM) _5TL"0p'- 1JOD__ LABOR = RATERIAL 80RD (SON) 1R. M •hnaaat to City Of RaeW CocasonRN Ia RICIP&l Code, Title 1, Cbapter I.Co. adapting Sao = *.g Iernwdlp C*Ooty Cade Title%. CMpten I.S. a cash restoratla /dollaeattmt Deposit Iball„ a sock, price to Istuana of a Enylbeeriny Fabseruceran pealt* ice, 'Revised I/8s ,his ••7 . Nord 4995357 - erg N.retn Marl.tt. Cbrual.ting CATCCO INSOPA.MCR CkXPAN! or AMMCA, e a •r t ure ty "V t i, gnature %Ito•,n��,n BtagS .. ?LEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNET TO ALL BONDS SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIEED rL; • FAITHFUL PtAfOtNANCE 8037 S` WNIRIAS, the City Count 1 of tM Cltl 01 Sae Cho Cucamonga, State of Ctllfornia, Ana hartin NtrletL Co rattan Otby agreeina+lav Vre% I;jI & etc 1 Instill ea are too to Whereby O4-11C at agrees s, install and complete cartel Certain designated vuLllc Iproreeents, .etch said ayeemeat, wrr2 dated No4 T. 1985 198 and idantif tee es in Pro loci Is baby re hrreo tc and udt a Dart eh rtof;and; WNEREAS, said Prihcipal is raeu,red under the tares of said agrtedeAt to furnish a fond for the faithful performance of said sortueet NOW. THEREFORE. we the yifincloa/ kndSfyt= ZMSOMlICR CTPANT OT AI¢Rtt IS surety, are htld and firmly bogod Ynte tnf 1 y O ant 0 .uumonga thereinafter celled 'City-), In the plant &am of amlul eonry of the t&t tar ln, payment 21"T cam ws eil and be 0 vet v erYly m, .e bind auryel•as. our td heirs, %mctnsora, eeeCOtoH and ad.iniltraters. Jointly and severally. firmly by thast presents The condition of this obligation Is such that if the above bounded Principal, his or Its heirs, eaecotors, aaminlatrators SOCCassors o%Ign%, %hall in all thing% stand to cad abide by • and we 11 anr d truee ly trip and Perform the cartnant%} "rditlont and Provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof slat ee therein provided• on his or their part, to be kept and i Performed At the time and In the manner thereto %ottified. and In all respects according to their true Intent and meaning, and &hall tedeanlfy and %e•a harmless City, Its officers, P9e11t% and employe %t aA therein stipulated then this obligation shall etto.4 it n.It and laid: .iherwisr, %hall be and remain in fmll forte ano affect ,a ' Aa a Part of the abllgat/0n tic geld hereby and In addition ti ` the flee ama fit fDa,lf'ed therefor, there shall be Included Costs ,t, and raltan01.9 taP.nsis and fits, iacluding reatonablt attarntl•t fees, incurred Oy Cfty +n such ss /slily tnfo.etng such eblioseten, all Lo be toed as Costf eec ins laded in any Judgment rentlered +• The surety hereby ItiDu site ace agrees that fie change, tab n.i.ft or t do. alteration or addition to the terns of the agqreement or to the Wort to be performed thereunder or the specl. ffcations accompanying to same chill in anywise affect Its no 719htiont on this bond, and It don hereby wive notice of any •. such change• eatensldn of tint, altetation Or addition to the terms Of toe agreement or to the wo -k ar to tha sDtCtflcatton%. IR WITRESS WEREOF. this Instrument bas been duly executed by ' th �. 19apr nciPH and surety atpvw named, an lbvr+her 27 N.retn Marl.tt. Cbrual.ting CATCCO INSOPA.MCR CkXPAN! or AMMCA, e a •r t ure ty "V t i, gnature %Ito•,n��,n BtagS .. ?LEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNET TO ALL BONDS SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIEED rL; • �i f LABOR AND H.LTERIALNEN BOND Rood 1995333 - WHEREAS, the City Louncil e1 the City DI Pan<ho Cuc"age' State of California, and Rartln Maletu Co r&ti on (nerelnafter designated at Dr nc pa fee en ere h o in &gr ten$ lot uhereal Principal agrees to Install and complete Certain do algqnatid public improvements, which said agreement, d.tad November 27 1995 . and Identified +s 0, 0 act I is hereby lrarrad to and Cade e part nere0r &n0 WHERTAS, older th+ term, of said agreantnt, Drincloai It required before entering upon the performance of the wort, to rile a good fad sufficient payment bond with thr City of PanCho Cucamonga to secure the claims to hich reference is made In Title 1S (GUsstncing with Section 3032) of Dart a of 0•.Tislon 3 at to Civil Code of the Stale of California. NOW, THEREFORE, sold principal and the underticied as a Corporate Surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all Contractors, subcontractors, laborers, m &teflalman and other Persons employed in tit marfo•maatt of the 0* to agreement aid refer -ed to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedur, In the swa of to nt -el At 1 n f e•ed-- -00 /1q 00111 1's (S 2B�Y!0 1, (or mater a a u•n t e or a ar nernon of any o I or ar ..Curti Cut under the UnanDlo; melt Inluranee Act with ratpr:t to stch work or LOOr, that fold surety wl'l pay the s sae In Or ucunt not tacmading the .mama nt marelmanow mat farm, and als' in Cast salt It brought upon this bond mill pay in addition to the face anount thereof, costs and reasonable taPen,n and fees, Including reasonable attorney's fees, incur,ed by City In successfully enforcing Such obligation, to am #.&road and fixed by the court, And to be taxed at casts and to be Included in the SW49911- therein rendered. t Is hereby expr &,sly itIPulated And agreed that this bond r Thal! inurt to the benefit of an/ and all persons, eacDanies ere corporations Clotted to file Claims under Title 13 (commencing with sec ti.n 3382) of Dart + of Divleat 3 of the Civil Code, so as to girt a Ngqht Of Action to them or their assigns In Any suit Drought uDOn lhlt bond. Should the Condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation %hall beaomt mutt and Told. otherwise it shall be and remain In full force and effect The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, xetension of time, A ;teraelon or addition to the terms of said agreement or ins specifications 8CCdePAnying the sue shall In my manner affect its obligation$ on this bond, And it does here- in !Y waive notice of any such chAngv, extension. alteration or addition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instronant has been duly wxaCeted by 9 the Prime 1pal and sarety above named, an ----( I B_5, Jldynhr 21, 1905 soft vtu ryaut�� (1 A e mare ty , i MRICA . gnature ) - t cep an -\ aGt fed J.Br199' ?LEME ATTACH FOYER OF ATTORNET TO ALL BONDS SIGNATURES RUST BE NOTARIZED SOND191SION GUARANTEE No PEKFOCN4110E (SETTING OF FINAL NORUMENTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga p 0 Boa Boy Rancho Cucamonga, California 911!0 Gentlemen: '.i pursuant to Chapter As Article 9, Section 6AC97 of the Colt -night Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the finel mip of _ w_a71B are to be set and to ...... d by # sec Meer a engines, or surveyor on or before Jowt 67 n specified In th# Engleafrrs or u�r T{ Isa�o agrees to furnish the note& thlrean to Complete all #nglataring requirements specified In Sectfca 6 9491, of tie Government Code The undvif•ned hams, you heremrth the tun of S 1.160 Is a Cash cspOsit, laid dupesit to guarantee t at a monumin Es .111 be set and in, notes furnished as too.* provided an or before the date specified and that the engineer or surveyor will be Palo by the undersigned It Is turther undratood one agreed that In IN event the undersigned fails to C"Plete the above rtqu'rements within the time specified, the City of Rancho Cucaeangs Is authorized to Complete silo requirements or cause then to be completed and the cost thrrelf I• t0 be 4 Charge against said Cash deposit, and the City of Ran:ho Cucamonga 14 authorlted to mate the necessary tra.tfer from said Cash deposit to the Credit for the prrper City fund It is further igr•#td that if the undersigned does not present evidamre to the City Council that he has paid the engineer Cr surveyor for the totting of the final monuments• and if the am Inter or surveyor glees Lae notices prescribed In Section 66777 of the Government Code, the City Shall pay to said engineer or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made. %i If the cost of completing said requirements esceedi the amount of the cash deposit• the, undersigned agree& to pay the diffarence within thirty (50) days after receiving written ftatamert from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Aw Ifying the amount of the d ff -•e -Ce between the Cash deposit and the actual Cost of said ,ate '#+ants. Cordially, Martin Barletta Comratfen vubdivider 6601 RockUdiia Drive Address -- Bethesda. NO ip1: �• Date eovtmb#r 27, 1995 ' The dePoslter of record (for return of any portion of the Cash deposit) shalt be i Nartln Kar•etta Corporation, 6801 Noc&tae a Dr.. pehviefda, " 20817 ' ace o al v, sa NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FLLLT MUD OUT AND SICKED B 21CORDIRG REQUESTED OYt ead WHEN RECORDED NAIL TO, CITY CLERC CITY OF RANCHO CUC.nKOMGA P. 0. Don 007 RARC90 CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 9113) REAL PRO FOVY IMP i 31EMEKT CONTRACT AND LIEN AOREEKERT THIS 'GREEMEOT, weds and entered into this day of 10 _, by and bitween Matter guilders (hereinafter referred to as •Oaveloper•), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKOMGA. CALIFORNIA, ■ qunielpal corporation (hereinafter referred to as •City), provides as follows: UNEREAS, at a general condition precedent to the recordation of Parcel Map 9318, the City require$ the cor,etruetiun of missing off -site street Improvements Including curb, gutter, sidewalk, drive approach. tress, street tight and one -half median island adJacent to the property to be developed; and VNEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of such Improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; and [ UHEREAS, the City Is agreeable to such postponement - provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer to Conttruc. said Improvaments, at no aepense to the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the CItY may constrnet said Improvements If the Developer raft' or neglects to do so and that the City shall have a Ilan upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Oeveloper's performance, and any repayment due City. 4 ROW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE, 1 The Developer hereby agrees that they w111 Instill off -slto street tmp•,vements Including curb, gutter, sidewalk, drive approach, street trees, street light and one -half Oldish Island to accordance and coapllance with all applicable ordinances resolution$, rules and regulations of the City 1, effect it the time of the installation. Said Improvements shall be installed upon and along Acacia Strut and Hexen Avenue, not to exceed 6eyocd the centerline of sale street or beyond the frontage of the subject property except as required to provide for adequate drainage and traffic transition per City Standards. 2. The installation of told Improvement, shall be completed no later than one (1) year following written notice to the Developer from the City to commence installattor of the ,ads tastallaticn of said Improvacats shall be at no expi -se to the City. 7. to the event the Developer shall fall or refuse to CocP ;tte the fnstsllatinn of said improvements to a timely menner, City May at any till thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its letenct m to do $0. enter upon the property herelnaftor dascribad and complete said lmprorntnts and reraver all costs of completion incurred by tht City from the Develrrer. Each parcel created by recordation of laid up shalt be subject to a prorated amount in • per acre basis. a. To secure the performance by slim Developer of the i tarot and conditions of this Agreement end to secure the repayment to City of any funds males may be expanded by city in coepte11119 Said improvements upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain. J l sell and convey to the City. In trust, the following described C real property situated In the City of Rancho Coe stooge, Csunt7 of - An Parnardlno, Stets of California, to•wltt + - Parcel Hap go, 971R. in the City of Rancho CuCaon99a bail a �+ dltlatoe of a portion of to 2, tract to. 7207 11.x. 7e�5„ .• "" ?,d �'- Records of San Rerurdleo Coonty, State of Califoroia. �1 r S. This convey&"" Is in trust for the purposes described above. 6 mow, therefore, if the Developer shaft faithfully perform all of the act% and :Rings to be done ender this Agreement, than this conveyance shalt be raid, otherwise, It shall remain In full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and obligation% of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed 4y the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any ether applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. 7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall Inure to the benefit of the hells, executers, adain Istrators, successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. D. To the extant required to girt effect of this Agreement as a mortgage, the tcrm -Developer- shall be 'mortgagor- and the City shall he the 'mortgages- as those terms are used In the the Civil Code of the State of California and any other itatmte pertaining to mortgages an real property. %. if legal action is commadead to enforce any of the provisions cf this ngreemant, to recover any sum which tot City Is entitled to recovrr from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose tea mortgage crest- hereby, t"a the prevailing party shall be antitled to recover Its costs and such reasonable attorneys fees as shall be swsrJed by the Court. r. �yg i ti N"40.. Id WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto hex& executed' this Agreement on the day and year first above written, CITY DEVELOPER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, MASTER BUILDERS CALIFORNIA. a municipal corporation oy LA.C.C.lA.4R W,Twj Nyt _Sic fPlx: t� an C . Mayor ATTESTi —'Ta Z7 u�Ti- Clty Ctart •.rive see. ee.•.....•........ ..uu.........ua..........I..,u.. STATE OF CALIFORNIA I 1 at COUNTY OF :AN RF0.NARDINO) On '19 before u the ..deri 9ae o ary u c. person • y appear and BEVERLY A. AUTNELET personalty tnown to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, etCectively, of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAONAA. CALIFORNIA, a aun4clyal corporation, and known to at to be the persuas who executed the within Instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation and acknowledged to no that such municipal ce.rporatlon executed It. WITNESS NY NAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. .o ary yeayna uri—� STATE OF CALIFORNIA as COUNTY Of SAN NE0.NA0.07N0 On this the day, of before th the .n era gnu Notary Public personally appears persona y ncwn o m. to be Misled to .. en the Oasis of satiofactory evidence person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the wltAln Instrument and adtnow loped this —� executed It. WITNESS MY NAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Notary giature NOTEt WHEN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED RT A CORPORATION 04 PARTNERSHIP. TICE ANOVE ACXNOWLEOCCNENT IS NOT ACCEPTA LE. A . C OtPORRT [ON /PAATNFISR7►":CEWDUIECCERENT IS REQUIRED. 1 RESOLUTION NO.4&2— i8-04R '9-5— A RESOLUTION OF ThE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9318, _ (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9318), IMPROVEMENT %GREEMENT. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. AND REAL PROPERTY iMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Tentati" Parcel Map No. 9318, submitted by Martin Marietta Corp., and consisting of 2 parcels, locateu on the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Seventh Street, being a division of a portion of Lot 2, Tract 2203, N.B. 34 page 65, Records 0 sal d County, State of California was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on September 25, 1985; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No 9318 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Agreement, and an Improvement Agreement guaranteed ty acceptable Impravement Security by Martin Marietta Corp. as developer. NOW, 11HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of tho City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreemer Ind said improvement Security submitted by said developer be ani the same .re hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Nap No. 9318 he and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authori:ed to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of December, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: w3 4: Jon D. Rikels, Mayor � •r7 )v DI CITY OF F.ANC io CUCAMONGA �C V'* Ism STAFF REPORT �V, DATE: December IS, 11" City '•ncll and City Manager TO° Engineer FROM: Lloyd D• Hubbs, City 9 eering Technician located BT: Linda Beek, En9ln I SUBJECT: Approval of a Maintenance Agreement a for a Drainage Facil bm on theaventmast corner rcot Haven end Highland Avenues submittod by orarY drainage facility is is rural ar Tract No. 12922 a temstotm Drain Line As a condition of app reed to construct and maintain a required to be �ehaveni��oant,Venturtahas e91� constructed. Lyn within r temporary drainage facility Nithin Lot A of Tract Ho. 12922 and the south 19 feet of parcel 1 of Parcel MaD RECOWEMDATIDM he attached resolution it {s reconmended that tha City Council adopt nehaven Joint Venture . approving said Hainttnnance Agre�nt submitted by Yn /i Atta:hments 6V �o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA iMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGRE194ENT FOR TRAC NO. 12922 DRAINAGE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this Agreement 1s made and entered . RegulationsoOf ithec h provisions ormance City of RanchoCucamnnga,State of California. a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred tohereinafterby ferrede oeas the Developer, LYh2;41AVEN Jom VENTURE NITNESSETH: THAT WHEREAS, a temporary drainage facility shill be constructed hi7264tbeing Tract improvement regiirementtOf19saidaCity ifrsaid Tract rNo. Map n 12922; and WHEREAS, the Developer shall own and maintain said drainage facility until such time as dthe said City; M6ster Planned Storm Drain System 1s completed and accept y WHEREAS, the execution of this Agreement as heroin titer cited and continual maintenance it of Attorney are detmed to bo sufficeni to guarantee NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by aid betveea the City and the Developer as follows: satisfaction of reveloper at no expense to the Ci drainage facility to the ty, 2. If after 30 days following notification by City of deficient this Agreement, tDeheeCityrshallshave nteheeright at any time to cause work to be done by any lawful means. The Developer shall be billed for said of date of shall make restitution to the City within thirty (30) drys allotted, then Should evltye w111ilre ov r the atotalscosttifrom ithen0evel Developer, through the Landscape Matntenance Assessment District. 3. The Developer agrees to annex the drainage area into the City's Landscape Maintenance District. 4. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect from the MasterePlannedtStormtOrainyis icoympletodrandi accepted for o for waintenan � b tysaiidd City. At that time, the said area will be deleted from the Landscape Haintenance District. .r r 1 1 IK WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to oe duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the. dates set forth opposite their signatures: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, a DEVELOPER mnicipal cvrporatl7n aon u. mixers, mayor gna ure ' ATTEST: evB e—My A. Authelet. City tr Signature APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney n.�a- :'F'.�- 4x`Lr+,{se".`SSw.,' .: Tn•r .r.:f�: '�' ' � _ ..,. _ .is<+j"�Sr_'�' .eiv, a r. RESOLUTION NO. FiSA $$— 33i A RES,IXTION OF T.iE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIwNCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR A DRAINAGE FACILITY FOR TRACT NO. 12922 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Maintenance Agreement executed on December 18, 1985, by Lynnehaven Joint Venture as developer, for maintenance of a temporary drainage facility located with4n Lot A of Tract No. 12922 and the south 197' of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 7624; and WHEREAS, the maintenance of said Drainage Facility, described in said Maintenance Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of Tract No. 12922. NCW, THEREFORE, BE IT P-ESOLVE6 by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Maint mance Agreement is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to siin said Maintenance Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of December, 1935. APES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon a E.—Wa—pr 67 t' . +a CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA STAFF REPORT i G4TE: 1U, !;G: W,7 1V: City Council and City Maiago:• FROM: Lloyd B. nubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Summarily Vacating a portion of Seventh Street west of Haven Avenue As a condition of approval of Tentative Parcel Map 9318, the northerly half of Seventh Street fronting said parcel map will be improved to provide a 44 foot wide roadway within a fifty -four foot wide right -of -way, leaving a remainder strip of right -of -way not needed for street purposes. When vacated, this remainder strip of right -of -way will be included in Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 9318. Parcel Map 9318 is on tonight's agenda for final City Council approval. The portion of Seventh Street described above must be vacated prior to the approval of the map. RECOMM RATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the vacation of a portion of Seventh Street and a6thorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to record same. Respectfully ubmitted, i & 4ttachments S� _ n I Exhibit •A' Legal Description For Vacation of A Portion of Seventh Street That portion of Lot 2, Tract No. 2203, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 34 of Maps, page 65, in the office of the county recorder of said county, described as follows: Beginning at the centerline intersection of Seventh Street and the section line of Haven Avenue, as shown on Record of Survey recorded June 6, 1985, as per map recorded in Book 55 of Record of Surveys, page 94, in the office of the recorder of said county; thence N00022136;W 64.47 feet along said section line; thence S890371244W 33.00 feet to th•a true point of beginning; thence Southwesterly 31.59 feet along a tangent curve concave to the Northwest, having a radius of 20 00 feet, through an angle of 90 °30'04•; thence tangent to said curve N89052132•W 721.73 feet to the east line cf the west 510.00 feet of said lot 2, said point also being 44.00 feet, at right angles, from the centerline of Seventh Street; thence 500.161430£ 17.00 feet along said east line; thence S890521320E 717.72 feet parallel to and 27.00 feet northerly of the centerline of Seventh Street; thence Northeasterly 37.91 feet along a tangent curve concave to the Northwest, having a radius of 24.00 feet, through an angle of 90 °301040; thence tangent to said curve 1100 °22'36•W 12.97 feet to the true point of beginning. ■ ( ( : \ \)ƒ \ Eo § w 7 7 & / , � ;t•• �■ ! \ ¥ w ,0". >9,W4 i � � § # '( © ! 2 p |< �U !| . \ { r4 �| . < .� ~�va� RESOLUTION 110. i3f -YSMR gs -33a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO = CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF SEVENTH STREET WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is author'Ted to summarily vacate a portion of the City Street hereinafter more particula,l) described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that n portion of Seventh Street is unnecessary for present or prospective pubic street purposes because it has been superseded by relocation. NOV. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby males its order vacating that portion of street on Map V-051 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, mnrked Exhibit •A", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said por of on of— Seventh Street no longer constitutes a street or public utility easement. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution co oe recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and AWPTED this 18th day of necembe•, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on 0. Mikels. Mayor iS ? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT' 7• rO>p O . U V Z U > F. BATE: December 18, 1985 W" TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Vartan V. Vartanians, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Intent to vacate a portion of Almond Street between Beryl Street and Amethyst Avenue The City is in receipt of a request from the developers of tentative Tract No. 11626 to vacate a portion of Almond Street between Beryl Street and Amethyst Avenue. The concept of this vacation and the incorporation of the vacated portions with said tentative tract were approved by the Planning Commission during its review of the tentative map. Portion of Almond Street proposed for vacation is unimproved and is not necessary for present or prospective public street purposes. Area property owner; will receive notices of public hearing and the street will be adequetly posted prior to the public hearing date. RECOMMEND 1110M 1 is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the dot! of public hearing on January 15, 1996 for the vacation of the above de•:ribed street. Respectfully su fitted, O L8 YV:de k„ Attachments } CITY OF PROJEC RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE _ ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT. 73 12626 •9x ALMOND STREET VACATION - EIHIDIT 'A• - 1 Ton PORTION or At1NNO STREET AS SERIN ON THE NAP Or CUUMIGA 2 NO$a9TE.I0 A3E0CIATION, IN INN CITY 07 RANCHO COCNIDGCA, COUNTS Or 3 SAN BERHMDIW, STATE Or CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN EOOE 1 6 Or NAPS, PVIF 66, RECOILS or SAID COUNTY, OrSCAIHED AS MLLD"t BEGTNTINO AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER Or Wr I, BWA 9 AS SBSNN ON SAID HOPI TRENCH WESTERLY ALONG THE 507rOERLY RIGHT-Or-NAY LINK Or SAID ALHHONO STREET TD THE HOST MSTERLY NORTHEAST CORNER Or PARdL NO. 1 DPSCAIRED PER DEED "C ROED IN BOOK 1166 PACE 252, RECORDS or SAID COUNTY$ THENCE LEAVING SAID 6OVTHECLY RICHE- OP -NAr LI Het NORTNEALY, ON A OULECrION MLLE Or 262.06'20•, TO A POINT 04 THE NORTHERLY RIGHT -Or -MAY LIRE Or ATMam LTHELT, SAID LINE BEING 33.0 I"? WrTD7.ALY Or AND PARALLEL WITH SAID SGWrM LY RIGHT -Or -NAT LIKE: THENCE RASTEALY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHY- Q?-NAY LINE Or ALMOND STREET 263.92 PESTS THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY RICEr-Or- NAY LIM SOUTHERLT IH A DIRECT LI tE ro A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OT- AY LINE Or BALD AUK)ND STREET, SAID POIRr RHINO TIE Hoar EATTEALY NORTHWEST GORIER Or SAID PARCEL 110. 1$ THENCE WESTERLY MONO SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT -or -MAY LTRE Or AINONO STREET 26D.I6 rzrT TO THE POINT or BEGINNING. 2211SAID PARCEL CLNrAIRS 0.21 ACRES 23 PAEPAREO BT HADOLC AND ASSOCIATES, INC., or RAB RERNARDINO COUNT! 246 W. 611 -7723 23 NOVrHBER 27, 1903 23 ®/19 e Gy .% 4 Y. 11 n•'�:j�x"4a •�fi�Jile�n �V Y M, .• / � •I • Iz?V 9� A I II 1 41 1� Tv RESOLUTION NO. 02- N-06R- '35- 3 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF ALMOND ' STREET BETWEEN BERYL STREET AND AMETHYST AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council herby elects to proceed under Section -8`70, et. seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to vacate a port off Almond Street between Beryl Street and Amethyst Avenue, a City street, as shown on Map No. V -048 on file to the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit 'A' and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 15th day of anui ary, 1986, at 7:30 p.m., in the Lions Park Cmmunity Center Building, located at 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the tire and place for hearing all persons ooJecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its determiniig whether said City street is necessary for present or prospective street Tvrposes. SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to be post- -e& —conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at leas: 10 days before the hearing, not moia than 30 feet apart and not less than thr=a signs shall -�e posted, each of which shall have a copy of this resolutio,, on tner and shall have the following title in lettering not less then one t,ich in height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET•. SECTION 5: The stblect vacatie.i ihall be subject to the raservatigns and except o- n�i any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 6: The M& ,,or shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attesE oTie same, ana :ne City Clerk shall cause same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Da17 Reggrt-, a newspaper of general circulation published in tho City of- Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. .r f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 18, 1985 pan TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Loyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: 1.1,1da Beck, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Release of cash deposit for setting final monuments for Tract Nos. 11173, 11173 -1, and Tract No. 9472 The engineer for Tract No. 11173 and 11173 -1 has .erified payment of his fees for setting monuments and markers. Ties have been received by the City. The developer, M. J. Brock and Sons. Inc., 1s requesting release of 51,500.00 deposited on June 6, 1983, Receipt No. 20193. The engineer for Tract No. 9472 has verified payment of his fees for setting monuments and markers. Ties have been received by the City. The developer, Boulevard Dev. Inc., is requesting release of $4,200.00 deposited on April 10, 1979, Receipt No. 02242. RECOMMENDATION It is recerswded that the City Council approve tho release of said cash deposits. *Re y zubai a' Attachments 77 X,., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 18, 1985 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Slane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer ON c��� LIM SUBJECT: Execution of Loan Agreement between the City and Philo Biane and Jeanne Biane, owners of Parcels He. 201 463 -47 and Parcels Ho. 201- 083 -49 for payment of annual assessments for Assessment District No. 84 -2, Alta Loma Channel Improv- -& is Purs,iant to Council action on March 20, 1985, a Loan Agreement has been prepared for Mr. Philo Biane for assistance in payment of annual assessments for Assessment District 84 -2 fnr the Alta Lcma Storm Drain. The agreement prepared by Mr. Mackenzie Brown, the legal counsel representing the City to the Assessment District proceedings, will provide for an annual loan to pay Mr. Blanes assessments for the two parcels where his present vineyard and citrus grove are located. The Agreement would be in effect until the property is sold for development or until the bonds are retired. The confirmed assessments for each respective parcel are for Parcel 201- 083-47, $9,116.78 and for Parcel 201- 083 -49, $15,245.1, to be paid over the 15 -year bond period and would set the maximum loan amounts. Payment by the City with regard to the Loan Agreement would be made from the Draindge fund. Mr. Biane has expressed the dssire to pay this year's assessment and subsequent assessments and to exercise the agreement only as need arises. i believe his willingness to participate 'in the development of the community in these regards is noteworthy and cowaendable. RECOMMENDATION It 1s hereby recommended that the Loan Agreement with Philo and Jeanne Biane to be approved by the City Council executed by the Mayor and that said Agreement be recorded with the County Recorder. Respectfully dbmi ted, t� LBH:B .de Attachments '2O A*ce DATE: March 20, 1985 TO: City Council and FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA MEMORANDUM City Manage oo.. City Enginei<r1? SUBJECT: ALTA LORA CHANNEL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84 -2 - DIANE PROUST Attached for Council's information is a letter of protest from Philo Diane requesting that three parcels of Parcel Msp 8007 be exempt from the Assessment Distr':t. Two of thes3 parcels are currently vacant, the third contains 2.3 acres rsth Mr. Blane's home on it. The properties have bean included in the Cistrict to reflect the recent subdivision. of the property and the approval conditions for Tentative Tract No. 12588 which was approved on Parcel No. 1. The Intent of the District was to include all lands under active subdivision. These. properties fulfill that requirement. I have reviewed the conditions of Petrel Map 8007 and have confirmed that there was no precise :ondition dealing with inclusion in the Alta Loma Channel District. This fact would appear to allow t.''e Council some latitude in dealing with Mr. Diane's request. Obviously. Parcels 1, 2 and 4 have been divided for purposes of sale and development. It would be staff's recommendation that these parcels remain in the District. Considering that Parcel 3 contains Mr. Diane's home and will not likely be further developed, you might wish to consider exclusion. In the event of exclusion, the City would assume that assessment which is 117,773.89. Exclusion would require It minor amendment to the District boundary. One final consideration would be the fact that like most properties within the District, Mr. Blane's how was built without participation in drainage improvements of any type. An argument could be made that this would be an opportunity to obtain that participation. LBH:jaa Attachment WAD.-Ceanu/ r'es/D.no%d �o dk pro+i�sl� ex� in' #c Pdtp / Wh"O% Me.. 1:312nI • it.ntc auNda and ew.• // ?friast in We pyaaf •C astcuac slfo 'f` V wTe.J 'VVI t frsa•e 4VVA a G.a.s Ateec+sc"A4. 79 LOAN AGREEIENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this % 8 day of Ye 7' 1905, by aril between tht CITY OF RANCHO CUt iCrl (•City a ovum c ps�orporati, b and AA, La Z3 ;_g pot• - Te vv✓ye C �is1 ve 'Owner•) RECITALS A. The City Comc11 of the City has confirmed assessments in proceedings for the formation of a special assetsment district for certain drainage improvements, pursuant to tie terms and provisions of the •Municipal Improvement Act 0 19130, being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State ;f California, said special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 84 -2 (ALTA LONA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the 'Assessment District°). B. Inasmuch as the primary benefit for the Assessment District is the right to develop undevelopel land, the City Council is desirous to make funds available as a loan to certain property owners who do not desire to develop their property. C. timer Is the owner of certain real property located within the Assessment District and identified as tax assessor's parcel numbers 10'0 i i , and for further parti:ulars, reference is made b the lega scr pt on as set forth in Exhibit •A• attached hereo, referenced and Incorporated. City has determined that Owner w +es meet the qualifications for a loan. NON. THEREFORE, It I$ mutually agreed between the Owner and City as follows: 1. Owner agrees to annually s,ibmlt a request for loan payment to the City Treasurer, wft', a COPY of the current tax bill attached, said submittal and request to be delivered to the City prior to November 10th of each year that a loan advance is desired 2 Upon receipt of Owner's requtst, Lity agrees to loan to Owner, on an annual basis, sufficient funds to pay the Owner', annual assessment. City shall effectuate such loan by paying the necessary s•.au of money within thirty (30) days of demand. Except as provideO for herein, such loan payments shall be made annually, upon request, throughtut the term of the bonds, which has originally been set at fifteen (15) years. 3. Said loan shall bear interest frtm its date at the rate of nine and one -half ; percent nd �(9 S %) per annum, and reptyment of said loan, including principal a Interest, shalt become due and payable upon issuance of a development permit relating to said property or sooner, at the election of Owner. Accrual of Interest on said 1 oan shall cease following the termination of the bond issue. ■ 4. City will, upon execution of this Agreement by the parties hereto, cause a copy of this Agreement to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino S. In the event that the then Owner terminates this Agreement to accordance with th8 provisions of paragraph 3 above prior to the end of the term of the bond issue, the then Owner shall, following termfnat5on of the Agreement, be responsible for making alt future assessment payments. 6. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the successors, heirs and assigns of the respective parties. 7. This Agreement may not be amended except by written instrument duly executed by the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written hereinabove. CITY CF RANCHO CUCA40WA By: By: OWNER By: By: iJ to /Lr� CAT. No. NNM27 To Iw a ta•ac' w TICOR TI I INSURANCE (Indleidnil) STATE OF CALIF RNIA cotrrrt�v to� �q n-t' lr�znnrlr SL On_ _ / /.ARtArA /yw t 2 �,' /G V5 bcfo3,;pc the ondeniptd. a NmW Public in ad for o• , pertonay known to me or pm ed to me on the bub of tathfaeory nMwa to be the pemn�Awhoc as wi ¢ e� �m IcIbe to the wh6fo karmnat and acknowledged tdtr exr 41 cared the anon ;'.-; WIMUS my had and omdal ted ZAUDREY AH. N ARN Ft-atic++oc grN hw 74 lea) �, (Tkbwfae elneW tNrcralNil) 4i 9 nll-'-P PARCEL MAP N0, 8007 'W THE CITYOF RANCHO CA.LTAA/ONOA' 114 O A ORNSRIN Of A PORI7ON Qe THE F WN OF THE SOUTHEAST I/1 OF THE SgliMKSf I/4 OF SECTION 27 TOWNSMP I NORTH RANGE 7 WEST, SAH BP/INARpNO MPR1O14N, ACCOIIOINO 70 THE OFFIL'IAL PLAT THEREOF. L nLLLE- E�WSANOEROSt� ASSOCIATES rw ewer M •ww.r AR[Va! r•^I rY. •• IfOAO r —1 fl c t AYON/! � •••.rn 4Y � I iu� srw• w` 6w"mWY.WRY: w. /w•w.• w /..wnrw..... wy /n'n!T M1I Ir{ wA w /n+ • AWr Y•YrIA�YY•W •r.[ /rM I••I l J I.�wr ww r •� w Q SUBJECT PARCELS 0 LOAN AGREEMENT EXHIBIT NAR w' r' J V� ONI K c � jNl I E iI ir, •w+rr r `uiyu/ • 1 r N" AM" 1 APN 2�1.O83 -47 fl c t AYON/! � •••.rn 4Y � I iu� srw• w` 6w"mWY.WRY: w. /w•w.• w /..wnrw..... wy /n'n!T M1I Ir{ wA w /n+ • AWr Y•YrIA�YY•W •r.[ /rM I••I l J I.�wr ww r •� w Q SUBJECT PARCELS 0 LOAN AGREEMENT EXHIBIT NAR w' a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date, December 9, 1.185 Tot Mayor and Members of City Council From, Robert A. Risro, Assistant City Manager By, Elltabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director Subject, collection Services Agreement The City of Rancho Cucamonga currently does not have an effective method for collection of delinquent accounts and dishonored items that have been returned by financial institutions. Current procedures on an item re- turned by the bank Involve a letter and a telephone call if a telephone number is available in most cases, the City never recovers the revenue which is lost by dishonored items. With respect to the business licensing function, if we are unable to obtain payment of the business licence fee, a small claims action Is Initiated. This is a satisfactory solution up to the point of continued willful non- compliance of the business irrugardleso of the judgement by the Courts wo simply do not have an affective Brans to collect when the business continues to dofy the Courts The services of a collection agency can offaetively and efficiently close the gap which currently exists. Gees and fusccfates provides the Clays 1 Flex billty of optional account rofarral Each account that Lamina delinquent will be reviewed on a case by case basis and will be referred only after all other avenuer of collection "a exhausted. 7 'No Collection - No C, vga' Tne City does receive 60% of all the •avenue collected, l Complete Debtor Inven•ory repo"ing which will provide the account status of all aerountai 4 ].agar face are paid by the agency and collected from the debtor should legal action be required. The City would cease direct Invulvement of any legal action. The matter of .S r collection would be r Iinquishcd tr the collection agancy ]O days after noti- fication to the debtor. RZOOIDENDATIONr It is recommended that author ization and OrAcution of an agreement with Gees v and Associates for collection services be approved :i 1 Y 1� •R 1. x r `r' 'y= • r '�Y4•Yn 41V 4 asatV Collection Service Agreement _ Clienu 1. Association Memberships and Ethics: Agency shall comply strictly with the Code of Mica adopted by The American Collector Associttion, Commercial Law league of America, and The California Association of Collectors. 2 Indemnifications and Relationship of Pettiest Agency is an Independent contractor, licensed and bonded, and is solely responsible for the employment, acts and maisalons, control and direction of its employees. Ag•n y shall indemnify and save Client harmless from any and all claims, demands or causes of action that may be asserted due to collection activity of Agency on accounts referred by Client. 1. Referral of Accounts: Referral of accounts to Agency shall be at Client's option by Client's City Manager or his designee Acknowledgment of accounts shall be made promptly upon receipt from Client. 4 Collection Ratesi Agency fee shall be 401 commissions on all monies collected against the principal amount assigned, regardless of age since last charge or payrant. When the account is a skip, required legal action or requires forvardi ,,g to another Agency o•:tsida of our area, the rate shall be 401 of print: ?al amount collected. S. Legal Actions Agency shall not initiate any form of legal action without prior written authority from Client When legal action is authorized, Client will exe- cute A written assignment of the account. Legal action will be brought In Agency's name to further indemnify the Client. 6. Costs of Legal Action: Agency will advance all court costs and attorney foes. Anency shall be reimbursed for advanced costs out solely of first monies collected. Client shall not be responsible to reimburse Agency for such advanced costs from any other source. No commission is payable by Client on court costs and attorney fees collected. 7. Remittances: All collections are processed by computer. You will receive ywir state- ment of account and remittance chock on a monthly basis. 8 Direct Paymento, Client will notify Agency fmadiately of all direct payments. Client should transmit said payments to Agency in torn received, together with. any accompanying correspondence, in order to avoid confusion. 9. Compromise cettlanentsr Agency shall not accepr any compromise settlement without prior appro- val of Client. Agency will accompany a proposal for a comprontao settlement with a review of the facts and its recaem,ndatlon. 10. Bankruptcies, When a debtor becomes involved in bankruptcy proceedings, Agency will notify Client, file claim and await disposition of plea. 11 Progress Reports, Agency shall furnish progress reports in accordance with mutually agree- able instruction from Client 11 Record Inspection, Agency shall maintain for all sccovnt■ ledger records which reflect the original balance, additional chnrgesr collections, commissions, enure i costs and attorney fee, Client shall have the rteht to inapect such recordo 1, Date Accepted By Name Title Poe Client Address ehcne Maprasenting Gees and Associates .y j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: November 2S, 1985 TO Liz Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director FROM Gary W Richards, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: RELEASE OF NO DEL NONE SALES OFFICE CASN DEPOSIT F Work for the follor.ng tract has been completed and the Certificate of Deposit is hereby authorized by the Planning Department for release to B.J. Brock and Sons, Inc., 265 S Pandolrh Avenue, Suite 230, Brea, California 92621 Tract No Lot No Amount of Peceip• No Purpose/ Cash Deposit Location 11173 66 S 2500.00 21160 Sales office/ garage conversion on Lot 66, Tract 011173 Thank you for your as!istanse: if you have any questions regarding this release, please call filR:das i f: M1. . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Data, December 11, 1985 To, City Council and City Manager Prm, Bill Malley, Dirwator, Community Service. Subjeut, ACCEPTANCE CP THE BERYL PAR[ AND LIONS PARR REnzvNLOPMMNP PROJECT BACPOROOND, The Beryl Park and Lions Park Redevelopment Project (Accmnt Numbers 10 -0532 -8006 and 20 -0532 -8007) has been completed to the satisfaction of the Director of the Community Services Departzent. It 1s the.-afore recomaMnded that the City Ca•neil accept the project from the contractor, Mathis Environmental, Inc., as cmplate, autLoriza final payment and direct the Director of Community Services to file a Notice of Completion for the work. It is also roeewmanded that the performance halls and retention be released upon submittal guaranteeing rorkmnuhip for the required one year Maintenance and warranty period. There rare no change orders to the original contract price of 657,602.00. In order to accomplish the above. ene C'vy �•• -_r =a1 suet approve the f,llowlnq racmaondatims and the attached Resolution accepting the project and authorising the Director of Community Services to file a Notice of Cmpletia,. RECOMJWNDATICN, That the City Cmneil, 1. Accepts as cm/late tho Beryl Part and Lienr Part AedevalopASnt Project) and 2. Authorizes final payeent 1 h,thim Environmental, Inc. for the work) and 1. Rele A:a the parforet•ace beads and retention upon submittal ,unranteeing workmanshiq, and a. Approve the attached Peculation authorizing the Director of Community Services to file a Notice of Completion for the Beryl Park and Lions Park Redevelopmeat Project, 16 n 1, RESOLUTION 00. 85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO :UCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMTROVEMENTS FOR THE BERYL PARK AND LIONS PART. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Beryl Park and Lions Park Redavelnpsent Project (Account Nunbers 30 -4532 -8006 and 20 -4533 -0007) have been completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community GervicesM and MNEREAB, a *Votive of Completion is req•-lred to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the work is hereby accepted and the Dire.tor Of Community Services is authorised to aigu and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED thin 18th day of Decamber, 1985 AYES, NOES, ATTEST, 7 Jon D. Nike , Mayor Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk ' fit• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 18, 1985 TOs Mayor and Members Of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Comm+vnity Development Director BY: Linda D. Daniels, Senior 1-1-development Analyst SUBJECT: HOUSING POLICIES REprp-r irm nnac ocncvc, The Honing Policies Report for the Redev. ment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been prepared in conformer, ith the Tax Reform Act amendments pertaining to Residential Mortgage Revenue So, ' r fares. This Act specifies that any Issuer of a bond program must adopt a Housing nudes Report prior to December 3I, 19SS in order to be able to Issue so;d program In '16. At the present time the Agency has not determined whether it will be the issuer c 1986 Mortgage Bond Program. In order to maintain the ability to do so, however, Housing Policies Report must be reviewed and adopted prior to the stated deadline. Although this Report Identifies the housing pollcles for the Redevelopment Agency Mortgage Revenue Bond Program, federal requirements specify that the City Council Is the applicable elected representative of the Agency. For this reason, the City Council Is the proper legislative body to review and approve the Housing Policies Report for the Redevelopment Agency of the riy of Rancho Cucamonga, This Report and Its policies have been prepared pursuant 00 the minimum required guidelines established by the Internal Revenue Code. For your -onvenience a synopsis of Section 103A of the code, prepared by Jones, Hall, Hill and hits, Is attached. This synopsis outlines the required contents and general format of a Report. Ms. Sharon White of Jones, Hall, Hill and White has reviewed the Agencys using Policies Report and has stated fiat the Report Is in compliance wi•h the requirem. is of Section 103A of the Code. This Report has been noticed ofd scheduled as a public hearing required by the Internal Revenue Code. It is necessary for the Council to receive at public testimony, both oral and in writhrg, at the time of the public hearing. The Counciri must also direct the city Clerk to male copies available to the public and to file a cc v of the entire ?D CITY STAFF REPORT HOUSING POLICIES REPORT FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY December 18. 1985 Page 2 report with She Internal Revenue Service Cuter. These procedcrai requirements are also outlined in the o4ached Housing Policies Report synopsis RECOMMENDATION, Staff recommends that the Hawing Policies Report for the evo opment Agency of the City of Rmcho Cucamonga be approved by adopting the attarhed Resolution. Respee fullysubI ed, Fj I� Jack Lam, AICP, Community DevelopmrN Director JLr"Drkop Attcchmentsr Hawing Policies Report Resolution of Approval Hawing Policies Report Sympsis (Jones, Hall, HIII & White) 91 i` REDEVELOFMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMSEM 52- 1385008 POLICY REPORT UNDER SECTION 103A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC: t4VNIGA HOUSING POLICIES REPORT INTRODUCTION _ On July 18, 1984, Congress enacted Into law the Tax Reform Act of MR. —TFifa dcTimposes certain requirements on Issues of quolified single family mortgage bonds and mortgage credit certificates. One of these requirements is that Issuers publish a statement of their houjirg policies with respect to housing, development, and low Income housing assistance and report an their compliance, for the arse year period preceding the date of the report, with the Intent of Congress that qualified mortgage Sand issues and mortgage credit certificates give priority to fomilles of lower Income to afford hone ownership before assisting higher Income'amilies. In order to quality for a federal tax exemption for Interest an the qualified mortgage bonds to be Issued in 1986, this Repot must be published prior to December 51, 1985. As the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "Agency ") plans to issue qualified single family mortgage bonds In 19860 the following rerurt Is being published in order to comply with the requirements of the Internal R %vswe Code of 1954, as amended, and the regulations thereunder. PART A - POLICIES AND GOALS AM Housln Policies and Goals - The California State Legislature has found and ec o e 1 air It is necessary and essential that redevelopment agencies be authorized to make long -term, low- interest loans through quatifl td mortgage lenders to finance residential construction In order to en- oirage Investment and upgrade redevelopment project areas end Increase the supply of housing. Unless redevelopment agencies generate mortgage funds and provide some form of assistance to fina,ce residential construction, many redevelopment crew will stagnate and deteriorate because owners and Investors ure anable to obtain loans from private sources (California Health end Safety Code Section 33750.) The California Stute Legislature txls additionally found and declared th t -n a program to provide residential construction financing woulu accomplish the followings (o) Facilitate Increasing the supply of urban housing and ease the housing shortage that exists in many parts of the states (California Health and Safety Code Section 33751(o).) The Agency plans to issue qualified single family mortgage bonds in 1986 in furtherance of the above stated policies of the Callfamia State Legislature and In conformance to the following policies oral goals$ (i) Use of Proceeds - The proceeds of the bonds will be used to 1 nonce the acquisition of restdcncm _Z_ 93 (li) Targeting oof Proceeds to Hovsi Tye, - The proceeds of tha bonds wll targeted to new s n le family housing. - (.II) Determination of Need for Tor etln has - The Agency determined t nee or target ng the bond proceeds for use In the acquisition of new homes based on the above stated excerpts of the California Health and Safety Code as well as the City's adopted 1984 Housing Element. Qv} Mettnod o: Tar etin Pro --eeds - In order to mute that t e prz-ee s are use to assist families in the acquisition of new homes, the monies will be targeted to those developers with projects which are rewly constructed and not occupied, under construction, or anticipated for construction during the bond program. (v) Other Pertinent Information - Due to the availability of fne ondprogram, tie sKgrney does not intend to Issue a mortgage credit certificate program, because they would, by necessity, be directed to higher Income persons than the housing bond program. NO Hotein Policies Coordination - The Musing policies snot here nabove are in conformance with the Rancho Cucamonga 1984 Housing Element of the General Plat which Includes program 5.1, which states "administer and continue to develop residential mortguge bands whereby lower Interest loam can be issued to first time Mme bvyerN earning at or below 12096 of the established median Income level". The Housing Policies set forth above conform to the Development Policies and the Low Income Housing Assistance Policies stated herelm A(2) Develo meat Policies and Goats - The California State Legislature has iau and ee are tat: It is necessary and essential that redevelopment agencies be authorized to make lap -term, low- interest loons through qualified mortgage lenders to finance tesidential construction In order to encourage Investment and upgrade redevelopment project areas aid increase the supply of housing. Unlem redenatopmen: agencies genero!o mortgage fundd& and provido some Comm of assists. nee to finance residential eonstruetlon, many redevelopment areas will stagnate and deteriorate because owners and investors are unable to obtain loam from private sources (California Health and Safety Code Section 33750.) The ralifornia State Legislature has additionally found end doclored that: a prvgrom to provide residential construction ihtanctng would accomplish the following v` (a) Facilitate Increasing the supply of urban housing and ease the °' n housing shortage inat a.ists In many parts of the states -3- -z;.. _ .. _ (b) Stimulate urban building and construction actitdty ant thereby Increase urban -employment a-d Improve the urban tax base (Califomia Health and Safety Ccdo Section 33751 (a) and (b).) _ (c) It Is the Intent of the Legislature, in enacting this chapter, to strengthen the vitality and pr:mcte the completion of urban redevelopment for the gene-al public benefit. (Callfornlo Health and Safety Code Section 33752.) The Agency plans to Issue qualified single family mortgage bonds in 1986 in furtherance of the above stated policies of the California State Legislature and In conformance to the following policies and gods (I) Tor etln of Proceeds to Arem - All of the proceeds of 1 be w targeted for specific areas and developments in the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area (li) oruy those to se of S d o_y_t Arens _ The to include only those a designated for restden.'al .nopment as Identified by the land use map of the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga These residential designations may include land suitable for either single family detached or attached dwelling units, but In no ease will converted multiple family projects be Included as pat of a target area Clio Selection of Torcet Areas _ The Agency has chosen undeveloped aM deve opnng residentiall- designated land for Its bond target area since these lanais will maximize the use of the proceeds for the acquisition of new homes DO Use of Targeted Aroceeds - The proceeds of the bonds which will twgeted for the areas described In 01) above will be wed to finance the acquisition of new conttructhon (v) Other Pertinent Information - Tho Agency has no other pertinent Information to state with respect to these development policies regarding bond proceeds. (vt) Dovel ent Poileles Coordinatlon - rho development po a es stet re nor •m ore In conformance with both the Housing Element and the General Plan since only those lands designated for residential land use shall be eligible to utilize the proceeds of the bond program. These stated development policies wo also In conformance with the mousing Elements housing assistance policies in that residentially designated lands, located within the redevelopment Project Area are able to participate In the program whdch will help to avoid over- concentration of families of low-income in any one project or crew The Development Politics set forth above conform to the Housing Policies and the Low. K Income Housing Assistance Polilcies stated herein A(3) Law Income Housin -';al+fonce Policies and Gods - The California State - Legislature has an e or t o program to provide residential - consttuction financing would accomplish the following: (a) Encourage Californians of all soclol and economic positions to reinhobit urban oreas, thereby rendering these areas more socially balanced and economically self - sufficient. (California Health and Safety Code Stetson 3375L) The Agency plans !o Issue qualified single family mortgage bonds In :986 and in conformance to the following policies and gods (1) Tor etin Proceeds Accordi to Income - None of the proceeds o t bo w necessorn y be targeted to low Income families, moderate income families, or median imone families (iI) infer Tor any method of tof target the Agency to not Income families. (iii) Other Pertinent Information - The Agency has no other per1 ncnt7nlormot on to state. (iv) Low Income Housin Assistance Policies Coordination - ant c pate Agency . o rogran 1snot eyeeted to provide assistance to low and moderate Income families. Tie 1985 Bond Program will, however, in conjunction with an e>gxeted City issue,nake available bond proceeds speciflcmly for stesz family categories. Thus, wWle the Agency Bond Program will net necessarily be available for persons making below 120% of the established medlan income, lower Income housing assistance will be coordinated through the anticipated 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga Bond Program The Low Income Hawing Assistance Policies set forth above conform to the Housing Policies and Development Policies stated herein PART B - ASSE$SMEtJT OF COMPLIANCE WITH PREVIOUS REPORT For purposes of the assnsment of mopliance with the previous Report, this Report is doled June 30, 1985. For this reason the assessment of compliance relates to the period of time beginning January 4 1985 and ending June 3% 1985. In 'he opinion of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Agency has suceesfully implemented its policles Identified in the prior Housing Report as they rAote to Sousing, eevelopmeni and low- income assistance. The Agency I= targeted the bead prococds to assist first time home buyers In acquiring newly constructed SWAT- nvithin .he id- ntifled Pruject Asea -5 �� Aw i PART C - COMPLIANCE• WITH INTENT OF CONGRESS For the purposes of this sectloN this report is dated June 3% 1985. > C(I) On April 16, 1985, bonds were sold by a Joint Powers Authority (RA) it the aggregate amount of $22,074,000 (the 1985 Bonds). The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga participated in the JPA and the amount of the proceeds to be used in Rancho Cucamonga Is $4,910,000 (22% of the issue). The following Information Is provided with respect to the 1985 Bonds: 0) Method of Distributinq 1985 Bond Proceeds - The Proceeds Of the ssue which represent 1 Agency's portion were distributed to a specific do-xloper based on their project feasibility, ability to utilize the money, the housing type and the cost of the home. (ti) Assistance to Lower Income Families - None of the se pro o tie which are to be wed in Rancho Cucamonga will necessarily benefit lower income families 010 Income Levels - The portion of ;I,a 1385 Bonds to be used n one a Cucamonga will be available to those persons or families earning 120% of the medion 1=4nb and above. Inasmuch as the 1985 Bonds were Issued in April 1985, w loans were funded prior to the dote of this Report, June 30,1985. CW On August 230 19849 the Agency issued single family residential mortgage bonds In the aggregate principal amount of $21,375,000, (the 1984 bonds) in an effort to assist lower Income families to afford home owrarshlp. As of Jae. 30, 1985 approximately $15,465,673 of the Bond prw-wds remained available for we. The following Information is provided with respect to the 1984 Bonds (1) Method of Distributl 1984 Bond Proceeds - The pro, o t were nstr to specific participating developers based on their protect feasibility, ability to utilize money, the housing type and the east of the home. 00 Assistance to Lower Income Families - The method used by the gency to distribute t proceeds of the 1984 Bads as described In (1) above was not designed necessarily to mslst lower Income families To dote, the proceeds of the 1904 Bonds have provided financial asststare to 0 moderate Income families and 0 median Income 6milies in the acquisition of a new home. Oi0 Income Levels - A total of $3,148,373 Is available to fun mortgage .cons to those persons who earn between 0 and 120% of the established median income. A totol,of,'• $12,317,300 is available to fund mortgage loons to, thiike;};. -6- 9'q perSors who earn above 120% of the established medlvn income C(3) On March I, 1983, the Agent; Issued single family residential bonds In the aggregate principal amount of $36,200,000 (the 1983 Bonds) In an effort to assist lower Income families to afford home ownership. As of June 30, 1985, approximately $5,529,425 of the bond proceeds remained ovailable for use. The following informatirn Is provided with respect to these 1983 bonds (i) Method of Dlstrl6utln 1983 Bond Proceeds _ The procee o t were tr to to specific Participating developers based on their feasibility, their ability to utilize the money, the housing type and the cost of the home. (ih) Assistance to Lower Income Families - The method used y t grney to if bate t proceeds of the 1983 Bonds as described In (1) above was not necessarily designed to assist lower income families before higher Income families. To date, the proceeds of the 1983 Bonds have provided financial asslsance for tame ownership to 14 moderate income families end 61 medico Income families in the acquisition of a new home (III) Income Levels - 0! the $5,529,425 remaining in the 1983 Bond- rog -ram, approximately $1,244,437 Is available to those families who earn between 0 and 120% of the established median Income The remaining amount, approximately $4,264,988 is available to time families who earn above 120% of the established medlon Income. The Agency has not Issued ant qualified mortgage bonds prior to the 1983 Bands previously discussed The Agency has not Issued mortgage credit certificates prior to the date of this policy report. This report Is submitted by the undersigned elected representative of the Rancho Cucmoong Redevelopment Agency. This Report was xcepted and approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at Its meeting of December 18, 1985 through the adoption of Resolution No. Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTESTS tieverly A. Authelet, ty erk 91? • 00000 -00 JHHW:ACH ea 11/01/85 HHPR8 HOUSING POLICY REPORT Yectlon 103A(J)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (the 'Code') required the filing with the Internal Revenue Service of a housing Policy report (the 'Report') prior to the issuance of qualified mortgage bonds. The substantive and procedural requirements pertaining the Report are set forth In final temporary regulations section Ae 10 %A-2(l) and are more particularly described below Content of the Report Cover Page The cover page of the report must contain the name of the Issuer of the proposed bonds, the tax identification number ('EID Number') of the issuer and the title, 'Policy Report Under Section 103A e Part A. Policies Statement. Part A of the Report should constitute a statement of the po -Mies o the issuer regarding (1) housing, (2) development, and (3) low - income housing which the Issuer is to follow in the issuance of single family housing bonds. The regulat'ons provide as an example of a statement of policies regarding housing, a statement concerning (a) whether the bond proceeds will be used to provide financing for the acquisition of residences, to proside gwlified home improvement loans, or to provide qualified rehabilitation loans; (b) whether all or a portion of the proceeds will be targeted to new, existing, or any other particular class o- type of housing, (c) how the existence of a need or absence of a need fnr such targeting has been determined; (d) the method by which the proceeds will be targeted; r) any other pertinent Information relatin g to the issuer's housing policies; id (f) how the housing policies relate to the issuer's development and low-income housing assistance policies as described in other portions of the Report The regulations provide as an example cf a statement of policies regarding dot alopment, a statement concerning (a) whether all or a portion of the proceeds will be targeted to specific areas (including qualified census areas and areas of chronic economic distress, as referenced In Section 103A of the Code); (b) a description of the area to which the proceeds will be targeted; (c) the reasons for selecting such areas; (d) whether proceeds targeted to each area are to be used to finance redevelopment of existing housing or new construction; (e) any other pertinent information relating to the Issuer's development policies; and (f) how the development policies relate to the issuer's low - Income housing assistance policies as described in other portions of the Report. The regulations provide as an example of a statement of policies regarding lov- Income housing assistance, a statement concerning (a) whether all or a potion of the proceeds will be targeted to low - income (that is, 80 percent of median income), moderate Income (that is, 100 percent cf median income) borrowers or any other class of borrowers; (b) the method by which the proceeds will be targeted to such borrowers; and (c) any other pertinent information relating to the issuer's low-income housing assistance policies. Is Part 8: Assessment of Com lsarce Part 8 of the Report should constitute an assessment of the compliance- of the Issuer during the ate -year period preceding "the date of the Reports with (a) tht statement of pellcy on qualified mortgajo bonds that was set forth to the previous Report, If any, of the issue; and (b) the intent of Congress that local governments are expected to use their authority to issue qualified mortgage bands to the greatest extent feasible (taking into account prevailing interest rates and conditions in the housing market) to assist lower income families to afford home ownership before +ssisting higher income families The "date of the Reoort" for the purposes of 777 the as smert of cam ltance Ortlarz o the enort :s June 0. or reports pertaining to bolds to a tssued to the roopliance review need relate only to the period between January 1, 1985, ar.1 June 30, 1965 With respect to the assessment of compliance with the previous Report, the regulations provide as an example a statement as to whether the governraertal unit or issuer successfully implemented its policies and, If not, an analysis of the reasons fir such failure. The regulations also provide, however, that an Issuer which falls to establish or to implement successfully the housing, development and low - income policies as discussed above will not be treated as failing to satisfy the requirements for a Report The Report should then provide, for example, that none of the proceeds of the Issue will be targeted to specific areas With respect to the assessment of compliance with the intent of Congress, the regulations provide as an example, a description of (a) the eethed used by the governmental unit or Issuer to distribute proceeds of housing bonds. (2) whethe^ and how that meth•.d enable the governmental un.t or issuer to assist lower Income families before higher income families, and (c) any income levels that have been defined and used by the governmental ertt or issuer In connection with the distributions of the bond proceeds The regulations also provide, however, that the Internal Revenue service is not Imposing on local government a specific definition of lower Income and higher Income families Public Hearing After preparation of the Report, but prior to Its 'publication" (see below), a public hearing must be held regarding the faport. Nottce�of Hearin The hearing must be preceded by notice published once pap In a newser of general circulation within the boundaries of the Issuer no fewer than 14 days riot to the heari� (Thus. •f notice is published on day one, t en the earino may be he oo day fifteen ) The notice of hearing must contain the following tnforastion: (1) The time and place of hearing, (2) any applicable limitations regarding participation in the hearing (such as a requirement that oral remarks must be limited to 30 minutes or a requirement that a person wtsning to speak must so request in writing at least 24 hours to advance of the hearing). (1) the manner to which affected residents may obtain caples of the proposed report prior to the hearing; (4) that the hearing will Involvz the. Issuer's policies with respect to hou•,ing, development, and low- income housing assistance which the Issuer Is to tallow In isfuing qualified mortgage bonds; and (5) the time and the manner in which copies of the report may be obtained following the hearing. 2 /� r•rf t'1 The Hearing. The hearing uu;t be a forum for providing reasonable opportunity for interested individuals to express their views, both orally and in writing, 3n the report that is proposed to be published. Local hearing procedures will generally apply. Publication of the Report Following the public hearing, the must be mace available for distribution Report in the office of an identified requirement Filing of the Report Report must oe °published°; that 1s, it to the public. Generally, filing of the official will satisfy the publication After hearing and publication of the Report, the Report must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19255. In order to issue single family housing bonds in 1986, the Report must be so filed oh or prior to December 31, 1985 Ae:ponsible parties Author of the Report. The Report is the report of the proposed issuer of the Lend$ or the governmental unit an whose behalf bonds are to be Issued Publisher of the Report The Report must be °published° by the Vapplicable elected representative" of the governmental unit which Is the Issuer of the hands or on whose behalf bands are to be issued. The applicable elected representative of a city is the city council; the applicable elected representative of a county is the board of supervisors; the applicable elected representative or a city housing authority or a city redevelopment agency is the city council of she city; and the applicable elected representative of a county housing authority or a county redevelopment agency is the board of supervisors of the county Holder of the Hearin Strt le Jurtsdlctlon Issuer. The Report, as noted above must a Dub tned fo owing a hear ng nder the regulations, neither the aappllcable elected reprosentstiveu, nor the Issuer of the bonds need be present ac the hearing and the hearing may be conducted by any individual appointed or employed to perform such function by the governmental unit The regulations also provide, however, that compliance with State and local proceoural requirements will generally assure that the hearing satisfies the requirements of the regulations As a general proposition, therefore, the 'applicable elected representative" (referenced above) should conduct the hearing Holder of the Hearing. Multi le Jurisdiction Issuer. In the case of an issuer which issues bonds on behalf of two or more governmental units (such as a Joint pewers authority), each governmental unit on whose behalf it is expected that the bonds will be issued must hold a hearing (as well as author and publish the Report). A multiple Jurisdiction issuer may hold a combined hearing on several Reports if the combined hearing is a °Joint undertaking° that provides all residents of the participating governmental units a reasonable opportunity to be heard. 3 /O/ .L As an example, to the case of a joint powers authority bond issue where the authority is issuing bonds on.behalf of City A and County 8, both City A and County B must have a Report and must °publish° the Report by making it available to the office o" the City Clerk (in the case of the City Report) amd in -the office of the County Clerk (in the case of the County Report). However. the hearing(s) may be either be held separatcly by the City Council of City A and tha Board of Supervisors of County B, or a joint hearing may be conducted for both City A and County 8 by the governing board of the Joint powers authority. The location of a combined hearing is presumed to provide reasonable opportunity for affected residents to be heard if it is held no farther than 100 miles from the sect of government of each participating governmental unit beyond whose geographic jurisdict on the hearing is condurted. Approving Resolution The regulations do not require that the Report be aporovetl y resolution esolution of the issuer or that, following the hearing, the applicable elected repre.entative should adopt a resolution approving the Report and directing its publication Because, however, local procedures are recommended by the regulations and because a resolution will ordinarily provide good evidence of action, the • applicible elected representative° should adopt a resolution approving the Report and directing its publication Sharon Stanton White October 26, 1985 RESOLUTION NO.-R lt-10 0 - 9S—'3y/ 4 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF V NCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFCRNIA, APPROVING HOUSIhlG POLICY REPORT OF TFIE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNDER INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 103A AND DIRECTING ITS PUBLICATION RESOLED, by the City Council of the City of Rands Cucamonga, California, as follows: WHEREAS, Section 103A(),YS) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, as implemented by Section 6aI03A -2(1) of the temporo�y regulations of the Department of the Treasury, requires the applicable elected representative of an Issuer of qualified mortgage bands to publish, after public hearing, a lousing policy report; WHEREAS, this Council is the applicable elected representative of the Redevelopment Agency of the Clir of Rancho Cvcammga, which Agency proposes to Issue quallfied mortgage bonds in 4986; WHEREAS, this Council has received a proposed housing policy report entitled, 'Policy Report Under Section 103A °, a copy of which Is on file in thus Office o! the City Clerk, and has reviewed sold report and each and every part thereof; WHEREAS, copies of the report have been mode available to affected residents of the City In the Office of the City Clerk, and a public hearing an the hawing, development and lows- intone hawing assistance policies which the Agency is to follow in Issuing gwilified mortgage bonds has been duly held following pub!Ished notice thereof; and WHEREAS, it is in the public Interest end for the oublic benefit that said housing policy report be apprmed and publlshed; NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby ORDERED and DETERMINED as follows: 1. The report of the Agency entitled, "?olicy Report Under Section 103A; Is hereby approved. 2. This Council doe• hereby direct the publication cf said report by authorizing and directing the City Clerk, ad the City Clerk Is hereby to authorized and di; ected, to make copies of sold Report avallohle wliNn two days of the date hereof In the Office of the City Clerk for distribution to the public. 3. The City Clerk Is hereby authorized and directed to file sold report with the Internal Revenue Service at the Internal Revenue Service Center, Phlladeiphlo, Pennsylvania 19255. 103 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATES December 18, 1985 TO: Mayor end Members o` the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: HOUSING POLICIES REPORT FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERNAL ANEITE ME- ASF2 The Housing Policies Report for the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been prepared In conformance with the Ta,. Reform Act amendments pertaining to Residential Mortgage Revenue Bond Programs. TF33 Act specifies that any Issuer of a band program must adopt a Housing Policies Repot prior to December 31, 1985, In order to be able to Issue sold program in 1986. Since the City Is expecting to Issue a 1986 Bond Program, It Is neces.,ary to review and adopt the required Housing Policies Report prior to o a stated deadline. The Report and its policies hove been prepared pursuant to the minimum required guidelines established by the Internal Revenue Code. For your convenience a synopsis of Section I03A of the Code, prepared by Jones, Hall, HIII and White Is attached. THs synopsis outlines the required contents end general format of the Report. Ms. SFcron White of Jones, Flail, Hill end White has reviewed the City's Housing Policies Report and has stated that the Report is In compliance with the requirements of Section 103A of the Code. This Report has been noticed and scheduled as a public hearing as required by the Internal Revenue Coda It Is necessary for the Council to receive ell public testimony, Loth oral and in writing, at the time of the public hearing. The Council must also direct the City Cleric to make copies available to the public and to file a copy of thr entire report with the internal flevenue Service Center. These procedurt.l requirements ore also outlined in the attached Housing Palieies Report synopsis. For the Council's Informatinv the Hawing Policies Report and the attached Resolution are very similar In content and form to those adopted previously which allowed for a Sole of a 1985 Mortoge Revenue Bond RECOMMENDATION: Stalf , ecunmmds that the Hawing Policies Report for the City oiiiancho-C—ucranonga be cyp, wed by adopting the attached Resolutlorm Development Director Attachments Housing Policies Report Resolution of Approval Housing Policies Report Synopsis (Janes, Hail, HIII d, /OT Y TF$ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 95- 3213002 POLICY REPORT UNDER SECTION 103A 114 N`� ul REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TFE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING POLICIES REPORT - INTRODUCTION _ On July 18, 19841 Congress enacted Into few the Tax Reform Act of i94iTXCt •.npraes certain requirements on Issuers of qualified single family mortgage bonds and mortgage credit certificates. One of these requirements is that Issuers publish a statement of their housing policies with respect to housing, development, end low Income housing asAstartce and report on their compllmce, for the are year period preceding the date of the report, with the intent of Congress that qualified mortgage band Issues and mortgage credit certificates give priority to families Of lower Income to afford fame ownership before assiving higher Income families. In order to qualify for a federal tax exemption for interest on the qualified mortgage bonds to be Issued in 1986, this Report must be published prior to December 31, 1985. As the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") plans to Issue qualified single family mortgage bonds in 1986, the following report is being published in order to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Cade of 1954, as amended, and the regulations thereunder. PART A - POLICIES AND GOALS Ail) Housin Policies and Goals - The California State Legislature has foul and ec err ttah there exists within the State of California a serious shortage of decent safe GAO rmitary housing which Is of fordaole to merry persons In the state. This shortage Is exacerbated during perlfxls of rising Interest rates, particular) as high Interest •ales have the effect of diminishing the number of otherwise credit worthy buyers `rom qualifylny for private sector mortgage capital sources In Order to remedy this adverse effect on potential home buyers an the lower end of the purchasing spectrtxn, It is necessary to Imp.emcnt a public program to reduce the cost of mortgage financing for ngle family pt- chases for those persons unable to compete for mortgage Cnmcing In the cunventlonal Mortgage market. (California Health and Safety Code - Section :1001.1 The California State Legislature has additionally found and declared tlatr It Is necessary and essential *hot counties and titles Le cutnorized to directly and Indirectly Malta long -term, low - interest Icons to persons not presently eligible for financing through private sector lending Institutlons to ffnmeo censtruetion, rehabilitatlo.q and mquisltlon of homes In order to encourage Investment and locul agrcde veaa. (Callfomio Health and Safety Code - Sectior 52002.) The City plans to Issue qualified single family mortgage bonds in 1986 In furtherance of the above stated policies of the California State Legislature and in conformance to the following podcfes and gooks 0) Use of Proceeds _ The proceeds of tte bonds will be used to nonce t ocquisition of residences. -2- /0 : (il) Ter ett of Proceeds to Hovsin T e _ The proceeds of t w target Eel s ng a family housing. (tit) Determination of Need for Targeting -The City has aterin r the eced tor targeting the nd proceeds for use In the rscqulsitlen of new homes based on the above stated excerpts of the California Health and Safety Code as well as the Cttys adopted 1984 Housing Element. (iv) Method of Tamar etmo Proceeds - In order to Insure that tVEand proceeds ore used to assist families in the acquisition of new horses, the monies will be targeted to those develops s with projcets which are newly constructed and not occupied, under construction, or anWIpated for cvxutruction during the bond program. (v) Other Pertinent Information - Due to the availability of t on {xogram, the City does not intend to Issue a mortgage credit certilicate program, because they would, by necessity, be directed to higher Income persons than the housing bond program (vi) Houstna Policies Coordhnotion _ The housing policies stated herelnabove are n�Tormance with the Rancho Cucamonga 1984 Housing Element of the Genercl Plan which includes program 5.1, which states "administer and continue to develop residential mortgage bonds whereby lower interest loans con be Issued to first time home buyers, corning at x below 120% of the established median income level". The Homing Policies set forth above conform to the Development Policies and the Low Inc. me Housing Assistance Polities stated heresy A(2) Dovclo meat Policies and Goals - The Colifondo State Le�Islature has c air t tt there exists within the State of California, a serious shortage of decent safe and sanitary, tCus!n% which Is affordable to many persons in the state. This shortage is exacerbated during rising Interest rate:. particularly m high interest :ales Iavo ti,* effect of diminishing the number of otherwise credit worhty buyers train ,;.,alifying for private sector mortgage sources. In order to remedy this inverse effect on potential home buyers on the lower end of the purchasing spectrum, It is necessary to implement a public program to reduce the cost of mcrtgoile financing for single family purchases for those persons unable to compere for mortgage financing in the conventional mortgage market. ( Califorria Health and Safety Cade _ Section 52001.) The California State Leglslat .•o has additionally found and declared that: it Is necessary chid essential that c z.ntles and cities be authorized to directly and Indirectly make long-term, low- interest loans to persons not presently eligible for financing through private sector lending Imtitutloss to finance construction, rehabllitation, asd acquisition of homes in order b . op N s ,r1Y fA ti encourage Investment and upgrade local areas. (California Health and- Safety Code - Section 52002.) The City plans to Issue gvallfled single family mortgage bonds in 1906 In furtherance of tiro above stated policies of the California State Legislature and In conformance to the following policies and goalu (I) .rorQ e�tlnn o�f Proceeds to Areas - All of the proceeds of W bonds vtlf�6e tar— geted - for specific areas and developments in the City of Rancho Cucamonga 01) Descrl tlon of Target Areas - The target areas include MY those lands designated for residential development as Identified by the land we map of the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga These residential designations may include land suitnble for either single family detached or attached dwelling units, hvt In no case will converted multiple family projects he Included as part of a target area (Ili) Seiertlon of Target Arem - 7!ro City has chosen vndeveiopcd and developing re3lden7lally designated land for its bond target area Or these lands will maximize the use of the proceeds for the oaquisition of new homes. (Iv) Use of Targeted Proceeds - The proceeds of the bonds which will be targeted for the areas described in 01) above will be wed to finance the acquisition of new xnstructlon. (v) Other Pertinent In - The City has no other pert nent n armat on to state with respect to these development policies regarding bxnd proceeds. NO Development Policies Coordination - The development poTic es'toted re stove ore In conformance with both the Housing Element and the General Plan since only those lands designated for residential land use shall be eligible to utilize the proceeds of the bond program. These stated development policies are also in conformance with the Housing El,�ments housing assistance policies in that residentially designated lamas throughout the City are able to participate In the Iuogram which will help to amid over - concentration of (amities of low- Income in any one project or area The Devalafwnent Policies set forth above conform to the Homing Policies and the Low Income Housing Assistance Polilcies stated herein. AM Low Income Housin Assistance Po[lcies and Goals - Under the California tote egis aturu cart@, neame restrictions must be complied with in order to issue qualified single family mortgage bomlr. These Income limitations, Nhdrh are outlined in Sections SOIF9(b) and 52020(d) of the -4- /V 0 A California Health and Safety Code, restrict portions of the bond allocation to first time Forme huyers whose Incomes do not exceed 120% of the median income. For this reason, certain portions of the money must be used to _ fund loans to low, median and moderate income families - The Legislature also allows for monies to be wed to fund mortgage loans to first time home buyers earning between 120% and 150% of the median Income. While this money may not benefit lower income families the money will benefit famllles who may not have otherwise qualified to purchase a home. The California Health and Safety Code does contain other Income restrictions where the family Is not a first time buyer or where the tame has been previously occupied. Since the City intends to target the proceeds of the bond tssua to assisting first time home buyers In acquiring a new home, these other Income restrictions are not anticipated to be used to a great extent in the Band Program. The City plans to Issue qualified single family mortgage bonds in 1936 In "nformance with the following politics and goals: (1) Targeting Proceeds According to Income - The City of anchc LuCoMM90 will target a portion of the bond proceeds In excess of ine first $20,000,000 received for families of moderate - (50% to 80% of the established median Income) and median - (meaning. 100% of the established median Income) incomes (11) Method of Tor etln Proceeds - The City of Rancho ucomonga me to us e the method for torgeting the bond proceeds to the Income levels described in (I) above by encouraging the participating developers to use these bond proceed monies foi financing lower cost towing all) Other Pertinent information - The City Intends to we at east of t fond proceeds for families which qualify as first time homebuyers (iv) Low Income Howina Assle nce Policies Coordinotimi - The housing assistance policies stated heremabove are In conformance with the City's General Plan as well as Program 5.1 of the adopted 19,34 Housing Element. The Low Income Hawing Assistance Policies set froth above conform to the Howing Policies and Development Policies stated herein. PART B - ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE. WITH PREVIOUS REPORT For purposes of the assessment of Compliance with the preview Report, this Report is dated June 30, 1905. For this reason the assessment of compliance relates to the period of time beginning January I, 1985 and ending June 30, 1985. In the opinion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the City has successfully implemented Its policies Identified in the prior Housing Report as they relate to housing, development -5 10 / and low - income assistance. The City has targeted the bond proceeds to assist lower income frmllles who are flint time Fame buyers In acquiring newly ecasfructed homes within tie City. PART C - COMPLIANCE WITH INTENT OF CONGRESS For the purposes of this section, this Report is dated June 30, 1985. C(1) In April 1985, bonds were sold by The City of Rancho Cucamonga In the aggregate amount of $53,725,000 (the 1985 Bonds). Inasmuch as the bonds were sold In April, none of the proceeds were used to fvmf mortgage loons Prim to June 30, 1985. The following information Is provided with respect to the 1985 Bonds 0) Method of Obstribufin 1905 Bond Proceeds _ The proceeds o t bon ,ssue were ,stn bute to specific participating developers based on their project feasibility, ability to utilize the money, the Musing type and the cost of the home. 01) Assistance to Lower Income Families - As of June 30, none o t {mote o the and has been used to assist law . incoma familbex (ill) Income Levels -Of ttv $50,034,100 available for funding, 3Si,33976i! is reserved for first time home buyer families earning below 120% of the median income. C(2) Augu b' nds st 23, 1984, the City issued single fomll/ residential mortgage bo in 1M aggregate principal amount of $27,825,000, (the 1984 Bonds) in an effort to assist lower income families to afford home ownership. As of June 30, 1985 approximately $20,894,936 of the 1984 Bond proceeds remained available for us;. The following Information Is provided with respect to the 1984 Bonds (I) Method of Olstrlbvtin 1984 Bond Proceeds _ The proceeds o t were stn t to specific Participating developers based on their project feasibility, ability to utilize money, the housing typo and the_ cost of the home. (11) Assistance to Lower Income Families - The method used y tt d ty to C131ribute the proceeds of the 1984 Bonds as described in W ebove was not designed necessarily to assist lower income families. To date, the proceeds of the 1984 Bonds have provided financlal assistance to 3 moderate income families and 16 median income families In the acquisition of a new Mme. (iii) Inc=e Levels - A total of $18,335,399 is available to uT nTm tgage loans to those persons who earn between 0 and 120% of the established median Income. A total of $2,559,537 is remaining to fwd mortgage loans to tho;e' Persons who earn al,ove 120% of the established median - Income. The City has not Issued any qualified mortgage bonds prior to the 1789 bonds previously discussed. The City has not Issued mortgage credit certificates prier to the date of this policy report. MIS Report Is submitted by the undersigned elected representative of the Rancho Cucamonga This Report was approved and accepted by the City Cmmcll of the City of Rancho C,aamongo at its regularly scheduled meeting of December 18, 1985 through the adoption of Resolution No. Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly uthe et, -Cr-- arts • °r`. eta` 00000 -00 JhPW :ACH:ea 11/01/85 HHPR8 0 HOUSING POLICY REPORT " "Section 103A(1)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (the Cade) required the filing with the Internal Revenue Service of a housing policy report (the "Report ") prior to the issuance of qualified mortgage bonds. The substantive and procedural requirements pertaining -he Report are set forth in final temporary regulations section 6a 103A -2(1) and are more particularly described below. Content of the Report Cover Page The cover page of the report must contain the name of the issuer of the proposed bonds, the tax Identification number ( "EID Number") of the issuer and the title, *Policy Report Under Section 103A." Part A. Policies Statement. Part A of the Report should constitute a statement o the po is es o the issuer regarding (1) housing, (2) dace lapment, and (3) low- income housing which the Issuer 1s to follow In the issuance of single family housing bords. The regulations provide as an example of a statement of policies regarding housing, a statement concerning (a) whether the bond proceeds will be used to provide financing for the "cquisitfon of residences, to provide Qualified home Improvement loans, or to provide qualified rehabilitation loans; (b) whether all or a portion of the proceeds will be targeted to new, existing, or any other particular class or type of housing; (c) how the existence of a need or absence of a need for such targeting has been determined, (d) the method by which the proceeds will be targeted; (e) any other pertinent information relating to the issuers housing policies; and (f) how the housing policies relate to the Issuer's development and low- Income housing assistance policies as described In other portions of the Report The regulations provide as an example of a statement of policies regarding development, a statement concerning (a) whether all or a portion of the proceeds will be targeted to specific areas (including qualified census areas and areas of chronic economic distress, as referenced in Section 103A of the Code); (b) a description of the area to which the proceeds will be targeted; (e) the reasons for selecting such areas; (d) whether proceeds targeted to each area are to be used to finance redevelopment of existing housing or new construction; (e) any other pertinent Information relating to the Issuer's development policies; and (f) how the development policies relate to the Ia uer's low- income housing assistance policies as described in other portions of the Report. The regulations provide as an example of a statement of policies regarding low - income housing assistance, a statement concerning (a) whether all or a portion of the proceeds will be targeted to low - income (that is, 80 percent of median Income), moderate income (that Is, 100 percent of median income) bcrrcwers or any other class of borrowers; (b) the method by which the proceeds will be targeted to such borrowers; and (c) any ether pertinent information relating to the issuer's low- Income housing assistance policies. Part 8: Assessment of Com llance Part 8 of the Report should constitute an assessment o t e comp Lance of the issuer during the one-year peftod preceding "the date of the Report" with (a) the statement of policy on qualffied mortgagqe bonds that was set forth in the previous Report, If any, of the issuer; and (b) the intent of Congress that local governments are experted to use their authority to Issue qualified mortgage bonds to the greatest extent feasible (taking into account prevailing Interest rates and conditions in the housing market) to assist lower income families to afford home ownership before assisting higher income families. The "date of tee R.norhe f,.. +h..,.....,..... _e ••••y •� �uua ••v we rssueu ln ayoo, the compliance review need relate only to the period between January 1, 1985, and June 30, 1S85 With respect to the assessment of c,impliance with the previous Report, the regulations provide as an example a statement as to whether the governmental unit or Issuer successfully Implemented its policies and, if not, an analysts of the reasons for such failure The regulations also provide, however, that an Issuer which falls to establish or to implement successfully the housing, development and low- Income policies as discussed above will not be treated as failing to satisfy the requirements for a Report. The Report should then provide, for example, that none of the proceeds of the Issue will be targeted to specific areas With respect to the assessment of compliance with the intent of Congress, the regulations provide as an example, a description of (a) the method used by the governmental unit or Issuer to distribute proceeds of housing bonds, (2) whether and how that muthod enable the governmental unit or issuer to assist lower income families before higher Income families, and (c) any Income levels that have been defined and used by the govsr-.mental unit or Issuer In connection with the distributions of the bond proceeds The regulations also provide, however, that the Internal Revenue Service Is not Imposing on local government a specific definition of lower income and nigher income families Public Hearing After preparation of the Report, but prior to its "publication" (see below), a public hearing must be held regarding the Report Notice of Hearing The hearing must be preceded by notice published once In a newspaper of general circulation within the boundaries of the issuer no fewer than 14 days prior to the hear!n (Thus, if notice is published an day one, then the hearing may be hold on day fifteen ) The notice of hearing must contain the following information: (1) The time and place of hearing; (2) any applicable limitations regarding participation in the hearing (such as a requirement that oral remarks oust be limited to 10 minutes or a requirement that a person wishing to speak must so request in writing at least 24 hours In advance of tho hearing); (3) the manner in which affected residents may obtain copies of U,. proposed report prior to the respect hearing; housing node elopment,nand ill low- incomee housingssassistancelwhichwthe issuer is to follow in issuing qualified mortgage bonds; and (5) the time and the manner in which copies of the report may be obtained following the hearing, 2/!� Ss -i; The Hearing. The hearing must be a forum for providing reasonable opportunity fo- interested individuals to express their views, both orally and in writing, on the report that is proposed to be published Local hoarfng procedures will generally apply. Publication of the Report Following the public hearing, the Report m-ist be "published"; that is, it must be made available for distribution to the public Generally, filing of t ;,e Report in the office of an identified official will satisfv t`» publfcation requirement Filing of the Report After hearing and publication of the Report, the Report must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Philade'onia, Pennsylvania 192SS In order to Issue single family housing bonds In 1986, the Report must be so filed on or for to December 31, 1985. sponsible Parties Author of the Report The Report is the report of the proposed Issuor of the bonds or the governmental unit on whose behalf bonds are to be issued Publisher of the Report. The Report must be "published" by the °appl lcab e s ected representative° of the governmental unit which is the issuer of the bonds or on whose behalf bonds are to be issued The applicable elected representative of a city is the city council; the applicable elected representative of a county is the board of supervisors; the applicable elected representative of a city housing authority or a city redevelopment agency is the city council of the city; and the applicable elected representative of a county housing authority or a county redevelopment agency is the board of supervisors of the county Holder of the Hearing: Single Jurisdiction Issuer The Report, as noted above must be�Isned -fo owing a earing" r the regulations, neither the "applicable elected representative °, nor the Issuer of the bonds need be present at the hearing and the hearing may be conducted by any individual appointed or employed to perform such function by the governmental unit The regulations also provide, however, that compliance with State end total procedural requirements will generally assure that the hearing satisfies the requirements of the regulations As a general proposition, therefore, the "applicable elected representative" (referenced above) should conduct the hearing Holder of the Haarin : Multi le Jurisdiction Issuer. In the case of an issuer which issues olds on bens o two or more governmental units (such as a Joint powers authority), each governmental unit on whose behalf 1t is expected that the bonds will be issued must hold a hearing (as well as author and publish the Report) A multiple jurisdiction issuer may hold a combined hearing on several Reports if the combined hearing Is a *joint undertaking" that provides all residents of the participating governmental units a reasonable opportunity to be heard As an example, in the case of a joint powers authority bond issue where the authority is issuing bonds on behalf of City A and County B. both City A ird County B must have a Report and must "publish" the Report by making it available In the office of the City Clerk (in the case of the City Report) and in the office of the County Clerk (in the case of the County Report). However, -the hearing(s) may be either be held separately by the City Council of City A and the Board of Supervise:$ of County B, or . joint hearing may be conducted for both City A and County B by the governing board of the joint powers authority The location of a combined hearing is presumed to provide reasonable opportunity for affected residents to be heard if it is held no farther than 100 miles from the seat of government of etch participating governmental unit beyond whose geographic jurisdiction the hearinv is conducted. Aoprovtne Resolutlrn. The regulations do not require that the Report be approved by reso u— 1 Lion of the issuer or that, following the hearing, the applicable elected representative should adopt a resolution approving the Report and directing its publication. Because, however, local procedures are recommended by the regulations and because a resolution will ordinarily provide good evidonce of action, the "applicable elected representative" should adopt a resolution approving the Report and directing its publication Sharon Stanton White October 26, 198S 4 //l7 .. ,r , x' RESOLUTION NO.- i- t2 -i1f 3S —3 y Z1' A RESOLUTION OF TFE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HOUSING POLICY REPORT UNDER INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 103A AND DIRECTING ITS PUBLICATION RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: amended, 05 Implemented by Section 6a.5103A -2il of he temporary regulations or the Department of the Trer<tury, requires }Be applicable elected representative of an Issuer of qualified mortgage bonds to publish, after hearing, public a housing policy report; r WHEREAS, this Council Is :he applicable elected representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, wtdch City proposes to issue qualified mortgage bands In 19361 WHEREAS, INS Council Ios received a proposed housing policy report entitled, 'Policy Report Under Section 03A ", a copy of which is nn file in the Office of the City Clerk, and has reviewed sold report and each and every part thereof; a WHEREAS, copies of •M report have been made available to affected residents of the City In the Office of 'he City Clerk, one a public hearing on the housing, development and low-income housing assistance polle,es which the City is to follow In �ing qualltled mortgage bonds has bcen duly held allowing published notice thereof; IHEREAS, it Is In the public Interest and for the public benefit that sold housing policy report be approved and published; NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby ORDERED and DETERMINED as follows: I. That report of the City entitled, "Policy Report Under Sec V. 103A," Is hen4)y approved. 2. authorizing end directing the( City Clerk, and the City Clerk Is hereby so authorized aby directed, to mace copies of said Report available within two days of the date hereof in the Offce of the City Clerk for distribution to the public. _ 3. The City Clerk 's hereby auttorized and directed to file sold report ' with the Internal Revenue bd -I— at the internal Revenue Service Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19255. t ',4' re. / /Y x a t �i.,�tyy �y w :4 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date, December 12, 1gf5 To; City Council and City Manager From; Bill Holley, Director. Community Services Kent Subject; PARR AND RECREATION LAND DEDICATION ORDINANCE ANEPD4ENT ORDINANCE 105 -D �o This prnposed amendment to the Municipal Code ptovielons on park dedication requirements deals with credit for private open space. The essence f the current provisions, paraphrased, are; A developer may be relieved of 50% of his public park obligation by Including within his project private recreation facilities which neat a certain criteria, which, again paraphrased, ere; 1. That the proposed private recreational open s;aea must he a minimum of three acres to be considered for credit, and 2. Provides at least four of the following; (a.) Children's play apparatus (b.) Family barbecue picnic area (c.) cam court area (d.) Seim pool with adjacent deck and anoilllary facilities (e.) Recreation building There is also standard languages in the private open apace provisions which describes exclusions, maintenance provisions, guarantees of use into perpetuity. etc. Controversy surrounded the edoptieu of these provisions because of the 'minimum th -ee acre requirement' as s prerequisite to consideration. Council adnpt_d the current standards, including the 'three acre miniann', with direction to staff that the matter be returned to Council when both Propositior 36 and the Park Bond issue Fad been resolved. As both Stems have been resolved, we are returninq to Council as directed. Current Specific Issuer The proposed Ordinance, 105 -D, delete* the 'controversial' section (underlined) of Subsection E (6) of Section 16.32.030. Presently... (6) That the minimum open space for which credit will be considered Ss three acres and provides a minimum of four of the elements listed' below, or a combination of such, awe otner rucreationl Improvements that will meat the specific recreation park needs of the future- residents of the area... Amended to... (6) That a minimum of lour of the elements listed below be provided, or a combination of such, and other recreational improvements be provided that will meat the specific recreation park needs of the future reside ". rf the area... Side Issues, In addition to the above 1.•ue on Subsectlon L (6), two other peripheral Stems (underlined) were not t% everyones liking. Specifically In the opening parmaraph. -Credit for Private open Space- Where private open space for park and recreational purposes is provided in a proposed subdivision, and such space in to be privately owned and maintained by the future residents of the subdivision, such areas may be credited against not more than fifty percent (SOS) of the requirement of dedicated and development for park and recreation purposes, as set forth in this article, or the payment of fees in lieu thereof, as set forth herein, provided the Planning Commission finds It is in the public Interest to do so, and that the following standards are sets First, the -may be credited'. The argument against -may` vac that the development community should knew up front if they met all the requirements for private open space that It -would' be credited. This is not add_eaaed In the proposed ordinance. Second, the •fifty percent (SO \)•.• Fifty ID -rcent as a criteria 1s as arbitrar' as *may be credited*. There in no magic in fifty percent, it could dust as well be sixty -six, Thirty -three of twenty -five percent, this again, is not addressed in the propoved ordina.,ee. ST"P COMXE Sl The three acre minimum is somewhat restrictive. most smaller projects choose not to provide three acres of private recreational open apace and thereby are ae: eligible far credit for what they have provided. Second, an the first side issue. -may could be changed to -shall- to remove the uncertainty involved. However, in doing so, care should be exercised to tighten up the criteria on what equipment or items are specifically acceptable as, say. 'children play apparatus'. To guarantee credit as c •shell- would do, all improvements should be of the same quality and came stan ,4ard as used by the city for park 'children play apparatus's Sam with barbecue and picnic equipment, game courtx, etc. This could he accomplished by adding to H (6) of the proposed Ordinance the underlined portion of the followings , a ...The subdivider requesting consideration for private open space credit shall, as put of the submittal filllrg, includes 1. Written request for such consideration by the Planning Coms]salont and ' 2. Submit detailed plans and ■pmcifications for areas and Improvements within such proposed private open space. Proposed - L prowemants shall be equal In quality and design to public perk Inproveaent standards where applicable i.e.. children's play be aratue, picnic and barbecue equipesnt, and game court daslgn sad construo tl on. The Planning renal On shall es, an elament of the review for private open space credit, solicit comments and recommendations from the Park Development Commission on all Ruch applications.., In this way it mkts it vary clean tp front, credit will only be given for quality improvements The second Aide issue of fifty percent credit Is purely policy issue. It would nano, however, with the positive coealderation being given to the development gomeuDity'■ concern over the 'three acre' isl vs, it would he teanonable to say that twenty -five or tblrty -turoo percent credit -will be given* for private open space that meet the requirement of Subsection E. COUNCIL OPTIONfs 1. adopt Ordinance 105 -D as submitteu, which deletes the three acre minimum now required. 2. adopt Ordinance 105 -0. eddltlgnally changing •soy be credited• to 'shall be credited- and inearting appropriate language to Insure that which is croited In equal to applicable City standards. 3. adopt Ordinance 105 -D, changing to -,hall ban ... And setting credit avallabl lity to thirty -three percent. f d. None of the above. _TAPP aDOOMMENDATION, Option No. 3 e )0 ♦Ass CRDDNANCE NO. 105 -D AN ORDINANCE O! THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, AMEND-LO SUB- SECTION E OF SECTION 16.32.030, OP -M RhUMO CUCANONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RIS.ATM TO PAP AND RIICCRRBATIONAL LAND DEDICATION MEQUIREMrt. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: Section 1, Sub - section E of Section 16.32.030 of the Ranebo Cucamonga municipal Code in hereby amen -ad as follows, - Credit for Private Open Spam-. Nh3re private open space for park and recreational purposes in provides In a proposed subdivision, end such space to to be privately owned art malatalned by the future residents of the subdivision, such areas may be credited against not more than fifty percent (50%) of of tb3 requirement of d,•dicatlo, and development for perk and recreation purposes, as set forth In this ertic or the payment of fees in Ilea thereof, as not forth herein, provided the Planning Commission finds it is In the public intwrost to do so. and that the following standards era ate (1) That yards, court areas, aetbaats and other open areas required to bn bintalned by the zoning and building provisions of this Code shall not be fr eluded in the computation of such private open space, and (2) That the private Ownership and maintenance of the area space is adequately provided for by written agreement, and (3) That the use of the prllate open specl is . .tricted tar park and recreational purposes by recorded covanants uhtch tun with the lan6 In favor of the existing and futures owners ci property within the subdivision and which cannot be defeated or eliminated without the consent of the Ccuncill and (d) Tbat the proposed private open space Is reasonably adaptable for see for park and recreational purposes, taking into consideratf m such factors as size, shape, topography, geology, arcane and location of the private open space land, and (5) That facilities proposed for the oper apace aze , substantial accommnca with the provisions of the recreatiuo and park: eletent of the general plan for the City arid are approved by the planning Caamisstont .na) (6) That a minimum of four of the elements listed below, be provided or a combination of such and other recreational ivprovments be rrovldnd that will meet the specific recreation park needs of the future residents of the area, I- Criteria List 1. Children's play opparatusl 2. Family barb" picnic arse, 3. Cane court area, a. MR Pod With adjacent deck and arcilllary facilities; S. Recreation bat ding. The subdivider requsntiaq consideration for private open apace credit shall, as part of the submittal filing, includes (1) written request for auuh consideration by the Planning Commiosion, and (2) Submit detailed plans and dpecifieations for areas and improvements within such Propdtd print* open apace. The Planning Commission ahallt as an element of the review for privets open space eredltt solicit comments and recommendations from the park Dewelopsent Commission on all such applications. Section 21 All other portions of ordinance 105 shall rein in full forte and effect. Section 31 The Mayor shall sign this Ordnance and the City Clark shall cause the same to be published within fiftenn (15) days after its massage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation ;bushed In the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of wancho Cocamenga, California. '. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ of , 198. A LSt MOESt ARSERTI Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk /0� :'v_ ' ORDINANCE R0. 283 AN ORDINANCE 07 THE CITY COUNCIL Or INS CITY 07 RANGED CUCAMONGA. CALIFORIA. REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 243, P11=11E10 TO OFFENSES AGAINST POLICE DOGS, AND ORDINANCE N0. 257. PERTAINING TO USE 07 ALCOHOL IN PUBLIC PLACES, AND AMENDING TITLE Y Or THE RANCHO CCCAMORGA MICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CUPTER 9.16 ENTIII.m 'CObSUMPTION Or ALCOHOL IN PUBLIC PLACES". ASD A NEW CUTTER 9.18 ENTITLED 'MESCMLANEWS OFFENSES.' The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamooga does ordain as fol lowas BECTICK It Ordinance No@. 243 and 257, both of which added a Chapter 9.16 to the Raacho Cucamonga Municipal Code pertaining to aiscellanews offenses and use of alcoholic beverages is public planes, are beraty rapalad. SECTION 2, Title 9 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cole is hereby amended by the addition of a am Chapter 9.16 to read, in words and figures, to folloust 'Chapter 9.1( 'Cepanamtl en e[ At eebel ie Yphlie Planes "S,etiallt 09.16.010 Dafialtiont. 09.16.020 Cootoar:ioo of Alcoholic Beverages in Publin Places Prohibited. "9.16.030 Pantries for Violation of Chapter. •9.16.010 Definttinna. As used in this Chapter, the term 'alcoholic beverage' and 'alcoholic - beverages @ball have the meaning set forth In Section 23004 of the California Business and Professions Code as the same presently exists, or as the same may be amended from time to time. '9.16.020 Cee..me[fen of Alrobnlie Revrrages in Pnbile Plaeea Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to consums any alcoholic beverage while upon any public street, allay, ways sidewalk or parkway, whether in a rotor vehicle or otbarvise, within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. '9.16.030 Peedtio• fnr Violation of Cha,Irer, It shall be unlawful for any person to violate Nay provision of this Chapter. Any person violating any provision of this Chapter @ball be deemed guilty of a risdawanor and upon coovietion thereof shall be p,.alsbed by a fine out exceeding One Thousand Dollars (81,000.00) or by imprisonment not exceeding six (6) months, or by both such fine and issrtsooaent.e / .. ti Ordinance +a. 2S3 Page 2 f, FMXID1 91 Title 9 of tbi Rancho Cucsaaga Municipal Code is hereby ' amended by the addition of a new Chapter 9.18 to read, In voids and figures, pt follows: '¢ "Cbee[wr a la "Miaeel Leeeas Offenua "Bectionet k{ •9.18.010 Interference with Police Dogs Prohibited. 09.18.020 Penalties for Violation of Chapter. "4,la,MO I t P rwerw witb Policn Deg, Probibited. It shall be 'h unlawful for any person, in a canner not otherwise prohibited by California renal Code Section 397 to teais, here$@, agitate, provoke, beat, kick, strike, injure, or in any way interfere with any dog being used by any law enforcement officer in the performance of his or bar official duties. e9.18.020 Pend ties for Violation of Chapter. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this Chapter. Any x, person violating any provision of this Chapter shall be dawned guilty of ■ misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Sollars (81.000.00) or by imprisonment not esceediag six (6) an[hs, or by both such fine and imprisonment. SECTION 4s the Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (13) days after its passage at least once in iha Daily Report. a newspaper of general circulation published In the City of Ontaao. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this • day of •, 19►. ATRSs NO3Bs � ADSIDPs Jon D. Mikals, Mayor ATTESTS a� i f' Haverty A. Latbalat, City Clam ordinarce Do. 281 to ;a 3 I, DE9EELT A. dUTMEy, MY CLMW of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was Introduced at i regular mating of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga bald on the ttb day of Decaabar. 1985, and was finally paned at • regular meticg of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucammgc held an the a day of e, 19k. i Executed chic a day of e, 19" at Rancho Cucamonga. California. Dararly A. tutbelet. City Clark ��I � ye CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8 _ mr3as D. MDaeh > Cauw,3. naab.l D Jefht, Ibw W7 Nkhud 3L Dd p•mAei.Trlald Kenneth V. Cox 6670 Alta Woods Val Rancho cucamocga. CA 91701 Dear Kr Cost November S, 1935 We have received your request to address the City Council on the issue of an anti - emoting ordinance. Since the November 70th &goods is already extremely fall with public bearing item, we have eehedo]ed your request to be board on December 4th. This item will be board after the public bearing Item as a City Manner's Staff Report item If this time is not convenient for you, please give me a call. Sincerely, Eeverly A. Autbalet City Clark e310BAtELNER0AD.SV=C • POST OFFICE BOX $01 • BA. \CBO CUCAMONGA. CAt.1FO8. \M VIT30 0 �6 4� . 1 4*;: t 1 1( G 8 ♦'O � �y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C O XrJ=D. MONa Chinn!. Batoe, B J.M'y 91's 14n Rkbudtl. DW Paaelalwec0 Detesber 2, 1985 David Sabibi 7816 Parlite Court Rancho Cueamoga, CA 91710 Dear Mr. Babibis Your request to be board by the City Council regarding the plaresent of a basketball goal in the rigbt- of-way has bead scheduled for Decesbar 18, 1985. The City Council meta at 7110 p.m in the Lions Park Coasa/nity Canter, 9161 Baas Line Road. The itea will be beard udder City Manager Staff Reports which follows public hearing item. An agenda will be wiled to you before the mating. In the wantine, should you have any questions regarding the above date, please give 07 office a call. cc: Dave Blevios Debbie Adam Lauren M. Basserwn Sincerely, �y Beverly A. Autbalet City Clark r7MBASUlhr ROAD. BUYS C. POBYOPPICBBOXW7 • HAICHOMCAMOING&LAUrOJOUNIr10. p1 41M9.1631 Y` vc ruE vaoERSilvr✓Ea AQE Nom6pwr ✓6C5 cr✓ rd -A-17 q:/ RAr✓cyp !GCAM011*A Xew0 ARE FL-T /TA0A11 /U6 70 TH-6 CrrP of R46'460 !t7 A.efew r//6 dqs t6rS1vz QACENgO/t,Qp /OT Inc- f-Jt o OF eu4 -06 -SqC To ST/9Y? W6 FEEL fr-k .4 G2E-A7- ASSET 7v THC- ,C,qmlL /Es OF TN/S /t/E /luNBvRN000. X8 /5/ PERL 17'E Cr,,W [C110 (FLA:4 937.03yy 1�1 � 4 PowTC GT. ` cvny",7116/f ',*g i- %rs 2 7�3° P� /.yam Cr C'k�..wwrk 7 �t it a Que�uu 97? 33 9V ■ f r _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA n t D NrJ. D. 0:0,0. TQ h � 2 Lm ch k j RK 111 J,hrt7 KYq ekhud)L DW Pual.l. N N,Id October 24, 1985 Mr. Havid Habibi 7816 Perlite Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: Basketball Goal in Right of Hay Mr. Habibi- Pursuant to our recent telephone conversation and your request for an extension it. the deadline set by the Engineering Division for remo,al of your basketball goal faun the public right of wsy, the Public Works Engineer has agreed to an extension until such time as you have had a reasonable opportunity to petition the City Council. You may submit a letter of petition addressed to the City Council which may be mailed to City Hall at P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, Attn: City Clerk, or your letter may be hand delivered to the City Clerk, Ms. Beverly Authelot at City Hail, 9320 Base Line Road. Upon receipt of your letter the City Clerk will schedule your request to be heard by the City Council. You will be informed as to the date and time of the Council meeting. With this process in mind, wP have extended the deadline by which you must remove the basketball goal or receive a waiver from the City Council to 5:00 P.M , M.onday, December 9, 11A15. ibis extension should all TM ample time to petition L'e City Council and to perform euy work necessary should your petition result in a negative dretdratlnr by the City Council. If you have any questions please contact me at this office. Respectfully, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Dave Blevins Senior Public Works Inspector e �} atsa RA ELMROAD,SUTMC. POST OMCK BOX 01 . RANCHO CUCAMO \GA. CALErOaMA/17.30.(:1 /) a 1831 �� W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 18, 1985 TO: City Council PROM: Lauren M. 'tasserman City Manager SUBJECT: Management Employees /City Council Workshop Council approval is requested to cooduct a Leadership, Excellence, and Public Management Program for approximately 50 management personnel and all mcmberx of the City Council am Saturday. January 25. 1986 sr Cal Poly in Pomona. The City has dedicated the current year to improving our service to citizens and clients. Our mattot "Striving for Excallance" has provided the focus needed to improve employee morale while providing responsive public service. The primary purpose of this one day program is to iavolva all management em- ployees as well as elected policy - makers to: • Explore the concepts of leadership, excellence, and public Management • Assess levels of personal excellence and leadership • Develop visions for excellence in our City organization • Produca i2xdtia action plans to strengthen leadership to our organiza- tion The workshop leader will be Ceorge Sipel, of the Center for Excellence, Palo Alto, '*aliformla. Mr. Sipel has mare than 25 years "patience in public moo- agamem[. While attendict the recent conference of the International City Management As- sociation, I bad an opportunity to attend a almilar workshop which focused on " "eerleace in the public sector." The program was challvagieg, relevant, and Inspiring. unlike may employee development program, tho principles of load - erabip and excalleace are transferable to job situations we fee* every day. /a 9 a City Council December 18, 1985 Page 2 2 It is recommended that an amount not to exceed 94.000 be appropriated ft -A the contract aenicas account in the City Manager's Departmental Budget to conduct a workshop on Leadership. Pxcelleace, and Public Management in January, 1986 at California Polytechnic University. Pomona, Approximately 50 management employ- ees and meobers of the City Council will be invited to attead the workshop. LWtboa r / 30 - w A } rj s Lauren Wasserman City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Dear Lauren: I have located the report to the Council on the subject of impounding off -tho -road vehicles. A xerox copy of the letter, which must have been misplaced at some point, is ef:closed for distribution to the Counoia. Please advise if further information on this subject matter will be needed. JLM=sjk Encl. / 3L/ Very truly yours, °y�` Jamee L. Markman City Attorney City of Rancho Cucamonga � CIT1 0 1 CI 6 CU6AWMA �Lhit"T ilrN NOV 25 U5 .s1' 9',.�IYiw,w��M� 718101NIll IC11Mw` �l/18'Y� t[N![p eIpLL� JANtf L Y1p11YY1 • Q so. OM ..DAM V MLSVNfpI N4�4LINFNII f[6t!•I099 w111M1 O .MlOX pIN MO.OLOI O Lw[p IOa TLLVwOF[ X�wTX. JO O[I[L[IL OOI OI•][II November 22, 1985 Lauren Wasserman City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Dear Lauren: I have located the report to the Council on the subject of impounding off -tho -road vehicles. A xerox copy of the letter, which must have been misplaced at some point, is ef:closed for distribution to the Counoia. Please advise if further information on this subject matter will be needed. JLM=sjk Encl. / 3L/ Very truly yours, °y�` Jamee L. Markman City Attorney City of Rancho Cucamonga 1� 0 Ootober 29, 1915 Lauren Wasserman City Manager City of Rancho Cuoesoaga P.O. lox 107 Paaabo Cucamonga, California 91701 Re, Enforcement problems with respect to Off-road vabioles operated within the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Laurent This letter and the documents enclosed herewith are intended to constitute a report to the City Council on the above - referenced topic. you will recall that Cocnuilman Dahl requested that this report be me" prior to the next council meeting. This office has th mad, unfortunately, has not actions other than those Roo Department to cops with the the violations described by violations not only to Cali! (treapaae) but also constita County Ordinance which the C A dopted by reference, is of a s *demeanor to operate veh cut the operator being able the property owner. The •wr it rather more easy to enfor of trespass i am discussing. were involved, a pereca coin by testifySng that tbara was or discussion with the owner sroughiy researched the matter iiscoverad authority for taking being taken by the Sheriffvj nabjw -*t problem. basically, :ouncilman Dahl constitute =La Penal Code Section 603(m) :a violations of a San Bernardino qty of Rancho cucawoaga has ! *at, that ordinance makes it .0100 on private property with - :o display written consent of .tten consent' r,gairssant makes a provisions against the type if only a Penal Code violation defend against a prc0ccvtUs an implied consent of the owner In the past. The ordinance /3 ;�- ...:,, Lauren Wasserman October 29, 1985 rege TWO Takeo it much more difficult for a trespasser to evade prosecution and conviction. to Please aita that the County ordinance in question y was Justified by the fact that San Bernardino twins vest areas where private property and public rooms indistinguishable, accordingly, the ordi- srt view, would be bold valid if attacked pursuant env µJaw$, sea ua. wyp. +v aaa. a wat aw&Wwuv iiti.ar a copy of Craig roes memorandum to me the Sports committee case as wall as other legal i man£iow"iihii Setter. Please feel free to the ammmorandum as roll as the other enclosures to with this letter. As on know, the problem now is being addressed through citation mrthod. Councilman Dahl specifically asked whether upon a citation being issued the oft -the -road vehicle in gueftion could be impounded or stored by the Sheriff's Department. She answer to that inquiry must be stated to be in the negative. In that regard, - also an enclosing vir- tually all of the California Vehicle code provisions which allow for the impounding of vehicles. Those provisions are sat forth in Vehicle Code Sections 22650 through 22671, all of which am enclosed. A perusal of those sections indicates that there is no impound authority with respect to citations for trespass. Dpeciiically, section 22651 states circum- stances for ramoving vehicles and impounding them then they are removed frog highways, Section 22651.5 allows removal from private property when an activated alarm device goes off and the owner cannot be found within 65 minutes, Bections 22652 through 22652.5 allow removal from handicapped parking spaces, Section 22653 allws removal from private property when stolen vehicle reports are filed or a complaint is filed and a warrant issued charging that the subject vehicle has been aabosslyd, Section 22656 allows removal from high- ways for traffic control purposes and highway maintenance purposes, Bettina 22655 allows removals for inspection following a hit -and -run ohcrge, Section 22656 allows rwoval from railroad rights- of •way, section 22658 allows removal from private property wben someone isproperly parks a vehicle thereon and there is signing on the property stating that /L Lauren Wasserman October 29, 1985 Page Tt W impounds will occur, Nation 22639 allows ramov -1 from state property or the property of an agricultural association with removal being Warated by state authorities, and Sections 22660 and 22669 allow the removal of an abesdcned, wrecked, dismantled or inoperative vehicle from the streets or pri- vate property under nuisance authorities. As you can sot, none of the above authorities for removing and/or inpoundiaf vehicles apply to removal isci- dant to the issuance of a citation for trespass. in discuss- ing this matter with the Sheriff's Department, the sheriff described one situation where they )1ave ttvwd and stored of_ the -road vehicles although they have not iVoKmded the ammo. That ciro=stance arises when a 8heriff's Deputy attempts to nits a parson trespassing on private property and than person fleas s erfs that situation 1 unusual), the Sheriffs do take the person into custody and, incidental thereto, have the subject vehicle towed and atored. I hope that this letter and the enclosure@ are responsive to the Council's request for information even though we have not unearthed authority for imposing more severe penalties on operators of off-the-road vehicles. Very truly yours, Jams L. Markman City attorney City o2 Rancho Cucamonga JIH,lj1 Encl. 13 .l ♦r Yr .. ' 6., ' .. INTER- OFFICE MEMO DATE November 22, 1985 PHONE FROM John ... 2utschcr, Captain Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station TO Lauren Wasserman, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT ALL TERRAIN VEHICLES III THE FOOT..ILLS PROBLE.ts me.. ,bers .,f the Cit/ Council and other City staff have received co1c.,.4ctnts frr., citizen3 livinS in the foothills about the off -coact veht -les trespassing and destroying Frivate property INFORMATION: 1. The daily activity logs at the Rancho Cucamonga Station were hand searched for the month of Sep- tember, and only one or two log items were noted. 2. The individual shift commanders and their .espective patrolmen were contacted and asked about the magnitude of their problem from their Perspective. It aas Their collective opinion that there were -nly a few motorcycles or all terrain vehicles treating the problem. J .t 11 tl ;wey� 3. The Sheriff's aviation Division was contacted and asked about their responses to that area at our request to check for motorcycles. Their response was that most of their tails concerning motorcycles were for the area higher up, near the Cucamonga Canyon mouth. 4. On Saturday, October 26, 1985, at approri- • mutely 12:00 noon, I personally flew the area with the Aviation Division and at that time noted three ell terrain vehicles. These vehicles, as indicated by Aviation, were higher up near the mouth of Cucamonga Canyon where they had apparent- ly parked their vehicles to off load the ATVs. 5. On Friday, afternoon, November 1. 1985, I went to the area in my Sheriff's unmarked unit and drove the dirt roads, whtch are most likely those travelled by the ATV's. While in the area I did contact two motorcycle riders. These riders stopped immediately when I hailed them that they were 1 and appeared cooperative when told in violation of the law and subject to citation for riding in the area. Both riders immediately left the area. 36 J .t 11 tl ;wey� 41 ' 5 • t Memo To Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Page Two v C PRESENT LAWS GOVERNING OFF -ROAD VEHICLES% z 1. County Ordinance 28.041 through 28.045 (Adop- .l ted by reference at the time the City was incor- tporated) - Prohibits driving on lands belonging y� to or occupied by another without written permis- sion, which must be produced upon request of a peace officer. (Misdemeanor). { 2. California Vehicle Code Section 23127 - Prohi- bits operation of an unauthorized vehicle on equestrian trails. This section requires speci- fied signing. (Misdemeanor). 3 California Vehicle Code Section 2800.1 - 4 Prohibits evading or fleeing from a peace ufficer ;i driving a marked vehicle and in uniform. (Misde- j meanor). ENFORCEMENT ACTION PERMITTED: 1. Since all three of the above sections are fi misdemeanors, the officers may either cite the { violator or physically arrest the violator. Writ- s; ing a citation takes approximately 15 to 20 minutes at the most, and would cost us approxi- mately $4.75 in man hours per arrest. Physically L arresting the violator and impounding the vehicle would take approximately 2 hours (30 minutes wait- ing for a tow for the vehicle, plus 1 hour trans- portation, arrest application, and booking, plus ! a minimum of 30 minutes to complete a long form +. report). The cost would be approximately $28.82 M per arrest. Addltior illy, since the storage of a vehicle fol- lowing an arrest is not authorized under the r California Vehicle Code unless the vehicle is .A on a highway, the vel.icle would have to be left t at the scene, stored at the owner's request (and hlk at his expense), or impounded as the instrumen- tality of a crime. Should our officers impound + the motorcycl9, the City then becomes liable for the towing ano the storage. The average cost for towing is $45, and the atorage runs approsi- mately $7 per day. `,Yy,ID' `• '} 7? IV, J, s Memo To Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Page Three ENFORCEMENT ALTERNATIVES: 1 Create a special patrol district which encom- passes the affected area, and assign an officer to patrol that area in the Station's four -wheel drive vehicle on the dnva and during the times when the Violations arc most likely to occur 2. Continue to respond to calla - for - service where the citizens hear or see violators in the area. RECOMMENDATION: A combination of alternatives 1 and 2. Alter - nativ,. 1 would be used when regular or reserve personnel are available and when it would not adversely affect the routine patrol. At other times we would continue to respond to calla -for- service in the area. 'Y CITY OF RAINCEO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT WE: December 18, 1985 TO: Mayor and Members of the C'ty Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Carmwnity Orvelopment Uirector BY: Lisa Wininger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ACQUISITION OF COMPUTERIZED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ABSTRACT: Since 1982, acquisition of an automated data management system r the Community Development Department has been under consideration. The proposed system would allow faster and more accurate service to thm public, increase staff efficiency and allot; better informed decision making. After extens'va research, staff recommends Environmental Systems Research Institute of Redlands (ESRI), to provide a computer system which will incorporate an autmn�ted parcel data base system, building permit Issuance, plan check and project tracking, mapping and revenue assessment. The Purpose of this report is to discuss the recommended system with the Council including need for automation and proposed contract budget, and to request permission to proceed with system design and hardware /software acquisition contract finalization within the specified budget. II. BACKGROUND: In 1982, a needs assessment was conducted by staff w ch tntified the need for hn automated data management system for Lhe Community Development Department. In 1983/84, this need was again identified and preliminary research began to review comparable systems in other municipalities and to solicit the names of consultants capable of providing a system. in March, 1985, a Request for Proposal was submitted to ten consultants to provide a data management system to the Community Development Department. Proposals were received from the following firms: ESRI, Professional Software /Jim Werle, VL Systems, Criterion, BSI Systems, and Intergraph. After an initial review and demonstrations, the two firms that were selected for further consideration were ESRI and BSi Systems. After further eonsideratio% E'F! was selected by Staff to recommend to the Council Sub - Committee and to the Council. .' L m CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT December 18, 1985 Page f2 III. NEED FOR SYSTEM: The purpose of initiating this program has been To' deve dp etter data management to increase staff efficiency, to provide better service to the public, and to allow better informed decision making. Current workloads and record keeping procedures have created a burden which slows response Limos to the public, creates duplication of effort, and makes data retrieval and analysis difficult and time consuming. Automation of a data management system would alleviate many existing problems in addition to providing new tools for decision making. Specific goals include the following: o Imolement a single project and permit tracking system. o Monitor revenue assessment activities. o Provide instantaneous public information. o Reduce staff time while allowing more efficient mapping and retrieval of records. o Provide sophisticated e. "alytical functions which previously have been provided by consultants with computer capabilities. o Enhance interdepartmental coordination of development activities. o Prcvide timely record keeping functions to allow better staff allocation, resour:es and timely reporting of information. d Better informed decision making and management. IV. PROPOSED SYSTEM DESIGN: The system which is proposed by nv ro.uaenta ys ems esearch Institute (ESRI) of Redlands, incorporates three basic components: hardware, software, and consulting services /training. Of the proposed budget of $167,000, approximately 70% (1115,000) are fixed costs for the deliverable items of hardware an' software. ESRI will serve as h distributor of these items from the manufacturer to the City at no mark up. The remaining $52,000 is budgeted for service items such cs in `allation, training, system design and custom programming by ESRI. " 13 7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT December 18.. 1985 Page i3 The Geographic Information System will have the following functional capabilities, in addition to others which may be developed over time: 1. Parcel data base mane ement: Every ,parcel in the City will Wave a recor n e ata vase which contains graphic and non - graphic information such as parcel /tract map, lot area, assessor's number, street address, environmental conditions, assessment district and more. This information will be available in map or report form instantly. 1. Butldtn emit issuance. A routine will be developed which a ows automat in of e entire building permit process including fee calculation, issuance of permit, tracking, inspection scheduling and finalization of permits. 3. Planeneck trackin / ro act trackin (he status and history of pTa—nc-Fe-cVs—&no of er projects sue as development reviews, tract maps, and conditional use permits will be recorded and tracked over time on the basis of type and location of application and current status. 4. -Special Revenue Management. The system will automatically calculate revenues, modify spreads based upon land division, allow modeling of alternate scenarios, and management of existing maintenance districts. S. Mapping/Graphics. Incorporating the mapping data base currently living developed for the City, the mapping hardwara and software will permit the generation of maps in my scale, format or color, from the'parcel level to the Citywide level, updating existing maps, creating new maps and production of a superior graphics product. In order to develop, maintain and utilize these functions, ESRI will provide four mayor categories of services to the City. These are:, o Acquisition of hardware and software as specified in the proposal and contract. o Installation of hardware /software and training of ir.- house persnnnel to maintain and operate system. o System design study to introduce system to city staff, identify specific automation needs, and develop a long range plan for system implementation. - CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT December 18, 1985 Page /4 o Development of custom procrarming routines for retrieval of parcel informetion, building permit issuance, revenue management, and staff tra'ning in command mad prog- amming languages in order to continue in house development of new routines. V. PROPOSED BUDGET: Proposed costs for the system can be itemized as follow.%: Hardware S 83,000 Prime 2250 Computer (1) Tektronix Color Graphics CRT J2 ,MB memory, 158 NO disk) Tektronix Color Grachics Copier Visual Graphic CRTs Calcomp Platte - 4 Prima Alphanumeric CRTs Disk Drive Tektronix Digitizing 'fable Software $ 32,000 ARC /INFO (mapping ani graphics /relational Gat& base management) NETWORK (networking /routing application) PRIMOS (computer operating system) Installation/Training S 12,000 System Design S u, S 25 Q00 Custom Program Development E 15.000 TOTAL COST S 167,000* *The distribution between the five components may vary slightly; however, the proposed budget will not be altered. The proposed cost meets the currently designated budget of $167,000. In the future, acquisition of additional equipment such as CRTs or upgraded memory for the computer may be accomplished on an as- necessary oasis. This cost represents a substantial discount on hardware and software cos.a by ESRI. A disccumt is offered to the City of Rancho Cucamonga so that the City's system may be used as & local demonstration system on an o,:casional basis. Software licens'ng fees will be approximately $6,000 per year and include all product updates and software support services, a though in the first year, no software fees are required. /q l CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT December 18, 1985 Page /5 The system represents financial benefit to the City in two ways: through substantial savings in staff time, and by generating potential additional revenue. Potential savings occur in the form of increased efficiency of staff, reduction of duplicated tasks such as data collection and storage, and more accurate data management, particularly to areas such as revenue assessment or permit fee calculation. The system also has the potential for generating new revenue through the sale of data in the form of reports and maps or system access to interested public agencies and private parties such as market research firms and real estate Interests. These option! would need to be explored carefully to determine tLe appropriate type of participation for other groups. VI. RECOMMENDATION: ESRI is recommended by Staff after extensive rasearc regar ing the proposed system and the qualifications of the firm. The following are the key reasons why this firm is recommended. 1. Ouataticns of the Firm and its Personnel. After an extens va re erenca review, Staff founT—tWat ESRI is highly recommended for their reliability, service to Their clients, and long term commitment to successful completion of system implementation. 2. Geo ra hic Information Svstem Features and a a es. a propose sys en is a o—fi r7 ed Tor oun c pa applications, with an emphasis on information management and analysis. I. Ability to to with the County Data Base. Examples includee rho dsniormat on, resource management, environmental information, assessor's records, etc. 4. Location of Firm in Redlands. Will provide the City w t persona ze service unavailable from fines located at a greater distance, particularly since ESII wishes to use the City as a local demonstration for potential clients. 5. Cost. Proposed cost witn the discount offered by UM is very reasonable in comparison to other systems examined. 6. Council Sub•Ccmmittee. This program has been presented o and reviewed by the Council Data Management Sub- Ccanittee. r�cS CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT - December 18, 1985 Page /6 Based on the above factors, Staff and the Council Sub- Committee recocmend ESRI as the preferred data management system consultant. Should Council concur, the following steps will be required to contract for the system within the budget of $157,000. I. Approval of the system design study and hardware /software contracts on the January 15, 1985, Council agenda. 2. Approval of custom programming /training contract based on the system !,:sign study on before the April 16, 1985, Council meeting. ACTION Approve selection of ESRI to develop the data management system within the $167,000 budget and diract staff to prepare the requisite contracts for the Council approval consistent with the time frame directed above. Respectfully submitted, Jack Lam, AICP Community Development Director JL:LN:cv �t •' i F n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORAND"I DATEt December 18, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FRDNt Mark Lorimer. Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: FLV nrNAIT4 aUEp I As part of the Council's direction for 9actor Control Cousuttias Services, Gees Zduoovski has submitted a Comprehensive fly density survey for yocr review. At the December 18 Cmucil meting, Mr. Zduaoweki will present the resulto for his fly survey and summarize the nest step in our process to implement a vector control program. Should you have soy questions regarding the attached survey, pluase contact m at your convenieace. HL /dja Attached -_;l i Yi City of Rancho Cucamonga Fly Denalty Survey ID17 Gene Zdunowski Wdor Car" coradtant 1615 W. rtm • Rea&nk CA 'I M41 M3614 A/15 O ,.. M -fia TAZLEOFCOMENTS Introftlion 2 4.5.6 Tablet 'Spedw of Flies TabIa2 Table ZA " Steps of Fly Davelopowl .... ..... Table 3 'Rummho DjcwnM Table 4 "Poultry PArd ln%wAkn Form*---- 10 Chart I "S fAw/jv. by Chart 2 •2 fireaclIng by 12 CM-l3 -2 Urapprovo Rorm by 13 Hopi - &nW OA&mts 14 N Nk r INIRODUf"1'10N ' The City Of Redo (Usaw a Ila within an are whkh Is an optimum mtcro-clirsela ( eltllude/ prmcitnityto mamteins ,vagetation,tanpmsturerages ft) for Wmskprmntofa number of public health significant M spacial The City also Iles within an area that was historically grloult r'el, which lent Itself to an earlier rural $91ing This In turn encouraged nlmal agrarian pu cults, In major cgrkvlluro (predominantly poultry) and hdsby /4UFFA These factors, coupled with no mxrdatary refuse collection, has kd the City to a historical fly population In perpetuity. preylaus studies aodeted In nelytbring communities, showed Uwt So% of the fly population cane from major agriculture, and 502 of Ina fly population come from the ciltaeu at large CntrlbAing fctors included animal4Wpings (ran omesttc pets: mmpost plwo o( garbage. gress and low.; over -rlpmW fruits and vegetables from Imsper4antperd� ;:; solid waste, refuse and garbage amumuloWbyIndividualhmwml& In fat, studies Rave am that without a fly tlyhl IId oath refuse contalrar° is capable of producing an we" n( 200 film per ssrak If garbage is not mlletxod at heal once weekly. With Um aforementioned[ factors In mind, the City Council dIrWad Chet a survey be conducted to dalmmine the scope of the problem, the major fly aevelopmant sources. the evaluetkn o(current poultry ra ch fly control mathodt, and dehrmins major species LYntahwd hra!n are the results of the CIy o(Radp Cucamaga s Fly De my Snnvey. r. N 1 Datermlra the ndan and adept of tM fly prcblems In IM city cf R cM ilxwmlps ^ <. EsMIfsh the ImI rtm, 'I it" Serra of fty praOeW that m W within Um mmmunity In anlmol raising opwittlons, restQmttal Wm.sm, snd other r_YlvltW associated with UM hmdllq of rpmk materlab 3. E"llsl the Imprtmros of the major ogricultural or= In =nmunl*j fly prod"m 4. Doammlpradlrss resPaWbis fWUm fly PrWxtioneoiymm S. Ifttlty spachc found, thalr seomrI innimfa, dtstrlbutlon, &A Ihslr tseomtton with vorI=wWIC media 6. Donlop,uw mmdrilanslydbptoafysupprmknprWw. 2 �Y d ttAf •\ h i SIIRVEv METHODS The survey was designed to include two major categories In the Ciy of RrMa Cummonge (1)ellpcuitryradns, ( 2) arami3enpitngo fresldntialaMmmmrclelereea The poultry ranches were Irgeoted L; the Vaclar Control Ibnsaltant according to the steMrds set by the Tri -puny Committee on ptiultry ranch standards (which included Son Bernardino Cony). The residential and commercial arees were surveyed by the Vector Control Consultant and two Vector Control Technlclatm Three different methods were used to collect date an all factors which might affect fly ,rodvlion 1) The Poultry Ranh Insooc ko form (TWis 4) was also developed by the Tri- OunyCommittee torollecl data on frtorsralatimto ranch management which contribute to fry &nkpment and breed % This form is also used to establish a fly population density ratlra a= This scare considers the larval, pupal and adult demitles and It can be used to :staollsh whether the rash Is In violation of Owny 3trnArds. 2) The AancM .Qacamopga Fly eta tMm (Tobtc_) was developed by the Vector petrol Wnsiltmt to collect deta an factors In IM residential and Miness communities that contribute to fly development and bredirq Tht- form, ton, was developed to"a fly density rating more to the community The car m stly was than compered to IN major Vianiturel sources In larval end pupal densities to esoertaln wheUw it meets the standards set for the agricultural rommunity. 3) The L tlml MW.E Qk1 pyalN Rellno Care was used In both of the aforementioned forms eat works as follows: 0 - when a sample is tahm and no lava or pupa re found that sample Is remrdad as a '0' . 5 - when a sample Is taken and some iarva and pupa we found but are observed with dlff betty the somplo is recorded as a 5' , 10 - what larva anu pupa are easily observed Ina srnple that sample Is recorded as a' 10' , 20 - when a sample is found that has as may larva and pupa as breeding media that sample Is recorded as a'20' The sampic s wo3 re ttnen added and divided by Me number of samples taken and a'taval and Pupal [Maly Rating acre Is established In major agricultural operations a damly of 7.5 or greetor Is grounds for a Notice of violation by the County's Dept of Envlronmsntal ftlth Servlon TWve different blacks were Glom at ration from a City of Retina paanoge )kvebpmentDlstrkdsHep. Eachblock( meMapl )hNaminfmanofninspnmlmsselectsdat random and a rvayvd by the Vwtor Blologlst Team. Shea a ttarmo nambietion was necemy to )o ale all breeding sources. the Mme owner was contacted and Informed of the survey before any ecamfnellon took place. ..4 .4t • } The survey resulted In the Identification of two premminnl spwIwfes7 fro W1h14rys, and fftaafdwWAv. Thee orgentsms were ca0allo In their distribution. lbwwer, due to the time of the year IMt tm survey wee, omduded, farmk was the species found In the largest numbers, See TWes I and3,and Chart 1 A fow facts are necessary We to dlaxsss the basic blokN of flies. Using the Muse fly as an example, we can give the reader an understanding of the scH7s of the problems Involved in fly control. The biology offamla will also bementioned The blology of the Musa M, /Am ob7AW1x, passes through a complex life cycle as stxrrn fn Table 2k these are egg, larva (maggot), peps, end adult. Egg laying begins about 4 days after mating The female fly lays approximatey 1200 epW In her llfetlma. Each egg hatches In 8 to 30 Mrs. After W Airg a smell warm Ilk@ larva crawls out to feed and ga ttro:ph gnwth staple to reach pupMbn. This larval stage can take as little as 3 days to oompktL Once the Iarve reaches the exl steps celled pupation It no longer Is motile and (4014 It Is analogous to the cannon of the buUerfly. Within 0a. pupa rase the larva tn&rpes metanorpho3ls (to drape form) end when cmpW the adill fly magea. The pupal stagecentakem little a,4 days to completa. So the, eaft can rote that In as little as 7 -8 drys the life cycle can be completed An adult house fly lives approximately two weeks, and Is found preftinanly In Sate ^n California from May toOdober The coldar months force th e&ultsto'wer- wlnter'by staying hidden In small warm area until the weather worms o;a again to temperatures ,warble for M breeding. The lesser hours@ fly, fev1Oaes7AwArA passes through the secr. life cycle as the Crouse fly Mwever, this Mover- summers' as a larva or adults In some coot, try plena ibe ep to adult cycle can vary fret 18 to 100 days dalwAing on tmpentue and moisture of the breeding media. Adult (Iles can live from 30 to 90 days A fell, winter, spring fly (Oct to Mey).fiveye females rest on environmental surfaces while the males exhibit the chareclerlstk Jerky, hovering flight In shxW cress. This flight pattern Is Wibited for the benefit of the female of LO species, as It 1s a mating dun of sorts 6esItlenllelm4@.utIM Table I presents, In order, the species of (Iles observed drlrp the survey. plume rote the nfarm to breading media. All of these were observed with var°,us stages of fly dyvekphrlenl dying the survey. Table 3 demonstrates at what percxtQaa thew vwkw sources were (curd breeding flies within Um blacks that were surveyed Table 3 also shows a summary of the fly survey data collected In the city. 4 /6D A t*l at 139 lots or percale of lend, consisting of 12 survey quadronls, W. S evaluebd They were primarily residential (8S2). The remaining 162 were MAIMlel. The agricultural survey will be addressed seprelay. Over one third (362) of reehdences and bust, , , had active fly breeding. the range of each quadrant is shown In hart 2. The surwy rVrowts a tuval std pupal density r8ltng sacra fr the commanity (wtUvA egr;altw8) at 2.42, compared to the major a6'icollural community rating of 1.56. Thisdrnonstre'm that the residential anti business community is currently producing flies at a Wastor frequency than IM egriculpual wmmunly The most prevalent altracUnts were of dog droppings (382) and refuse(482), which Include garbage and trash (see Chart 3). Unapproved r+fuse containers for fly control purposes (542) in eludhd those canUtnare that were made fly tight by the use of plastic baps. Sind a fly can enter al /8'opening.noxnlalner must have a fly tight lid tobeapproved Alrgaprtlonof the ens Inspected were bettered r had no lids at all. Table 3 demaetratxi that, depending on the a,ghbonccod codittm grp clippings. compost piles. r vsbus Terre anlm8ls (horses, cattle, goals, etc) could arco it for mere than S02 of the M breading -ohr•ra tteir Aarba agm Within it's bouhdrlas the City Im 6 commrcial poultry ranch mperalione remaining M prevlouy, mentioned all of these operatics were surveyed to aaertain their contribution to the overall City wide M pa>4lattm desiy. The Yeetor Control Omitmt was acchmponied by the general ranch mwgpr'to each facility. As seen by t e altached'poultry ranch Inspection forms' ern ranch was rNad fre larval and pupal density as wail as adult Population density. Mrll densities are taker to I) determine control meea arts, 2) dotermtne attractant migration; 3) dAWmino W.WV a. Each rand. was currently In the beginning stVs of a 'fat parasite seeding' program. This program is used in conlunctlon with to o.hr Integrated peat management pradloe already Implemented on the renihon The rerdes utilize predetcrs end the pad system for nAelning those predators when they elm M. Couny c•dfrat currently in effect, and originally adopted by the City. state that a 6' to 8' pad of manure must be fail wide L'e ages ha faciltlete frying and retain fly preWo% Each rancb mat County strdrds and bed wicellml fly control at the time of Irspection/evaavAlon (1.56 arrbga larval and pupal density raUrg aura). The highest LGP density was 3.6? aid the lowed L&P density was 0.33 In manures senplos. flamse from over 200,COO birco was exmtned S /S/ Si, Sinw the baser hinge fly is the predominent M mliwW from poult^y manure fray Wv+h to 4a /, iM mly pwlim faun! In this survey Jot hat bVw densltles of Amfe a than the pmItry rpdye were Ilm with large animals or heavy aavmuistl= or smell animal ' droppinn Since lad yeas M complaint perto0, one ranch has ben torn d m afar ranch managemnt changes by Use paltry renn operator we Ur hgtelldlm of raw cup wslertng s/slans on some ranches and raw mobmIzing upddes fr some of the older cup w+terers N the survey and cW from 1 11 -85 10 11 -85 found tM lesser Must M, Fmk ;wrnxvkr/; lM prMminenl species. Fke1N Ueperlmant rearda show tlh tear hove fly cawing Na r4rlty of cltlan wnplairAs. Kaaing principally commercial poultry ranch°. TM curve/ danmtreM teal the carnmtmlty at"Is ctv, m ty pn•:selr g an MAI or paalr amaarl of NU spealas 8. M average of 363 a W commmdty is pradcing a minimum of 50% of the fry pmulaticr, G TM commercial paltry ranch operations (mbar agriculture) are praoriq 333 to $03 Of Uh fly pagination ). In the surrey of rwidaillal and business premises, the majority ci Cis wu alants ad acorn ware gr" andolher refuso In rlgln. iM I><rrse fy wa the moat prevalant Iran faun; CUrr sources eontrMing to Un disowery of the most aedrnlnnt lesser Muse fly populations, focluded gross clippings, small and lap backyard animal Wass, end campost pl In E. in arir fr tat City of Ravin Cucenmrrp to Mve unobJxl'ormle M populations It sy ll ba necessary for all segments of tat ammniy to anb'Ibule to fly m rat ThW ce s be aoamplshed thr oo the use o full lime yaclr Cntroi Biologist, In aution tr,, Un nframenl at weekly refuse collection and tat use of approved rofuse containre. 6 _ _ E ThAlE 1 • SPECIES OF FLIES OBSERVED Scfentlflc Mne Cmmon Name Common Breeng HIQk ........................ ....uv........................u.0 u..v A"flawkv/wIs LwrWwFly Leavoandprwccmpmt, poultry aM dirt anlmal maraca, crtaln fruit rd "Pwla wales. Macy tEIdY Norm Fly AN anfm I manses, parbapl carrion, animal fad, fruit and vep tabllwale, Awhym FalseStableFtV Sw*asabove .s Stable Fly Cattle, horse ard rabbit mwwo Tars clippinps, wal fed for Wile animals. PAaesk v m Q een Bottle Fly Barbells, a* bwaps, carrion. 8Yk2II.>p Black Ov baps Fly Brbepa ZZIEN&MMY BlwBollleFly Mod= ps.gvtc e,carrfom 7 1153 LT 1 ilk Gene Zdutsowski Vector Control Consultant 1615 W. Fan • Redltids, G 91777 • (714)92 1614 e RANCHO CUCM10NGA FLY SURVEY Survey quadrant 0 Residence Zone - 0 Business Street _ Boundary streets SPECIES: 0 FannIa. s1? 0 Musca:R. f l rmscina m I% 2tMa4 roe 0 Qp!lyCil so, SOURCES 0 Dog droppings 0 Horse manure 0 Other large animal 0 Refuse container 0 Grass clippings 0 Compost piles 0 Other RFFUi5FCQNTAIff.M 0 Approved 0 Unapproved STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT: 0 Egg 0 Larva 0 Pupa 0 Adult LABYAL AND ,NSLTL' 0 Rarely observed 0Observed with dlffloulty 0 Easily observed 0 Heavy concentration: VECTOR BIOLOGIST _ Date i d 8 1552 Y i r 1 EGG STAGES OF FLY DEVELOP"ENT LARVA PUPA ADULT BA ��717 i 9 /S.6 t C p E F L 5ixw m t OuldmI I OA&wt2 OAarnl3 asMent 4 Ow*4nt 5 2 12 Icm Low On CwnmwLije Low w Off, Prff /NC 4 + &KVWW 9 9 1 3 12 I 12 prowirg 449 4 46% 42X 4% % ovaltyRoung 2.7 218 3. S 2.5 2.5 7 R FWUSO 569 10 % 1002 42% I % 8 %Famlaso, 33S tl2 312 259 as 9 8 20% 22x 421 ?S—X 712 10 12 9 11 % Sourm 0. 1 442 0% 382 252 Ox 12 13 k t4 IS 9SourccGassC pplf�s %SounrCpv!LmjPIles %Seuixl..gjwimal %Source Refuse _ 562 0% 23% 17% 02 112 Ox Is% 25% Ox Ox 422 03 56% Ox OR as 442 699 50% 9 /S.6 N 1 1 J OuWnt 6 DA&Snt 7 OAlran 8 IY*ry O ant 10 WWAOS 11 12 3 Low/V Lc.r Y LOw Low Y" L w I Y Low Low jgw — 4 1 10 9 12 17 14 15 12 s Sox % sox 425 sox 7% at 6 t 1.67 3.75 3.7 321 0.33 0.42 7 402 Ox 42x Sas 43% 40% % 8 20% 22x 421 ?S—X 712 139 12 9 0 11 302 33% 67x 582 —50XI-60XI sox 12 302 it 172 17% lox _ Ox Ox 3 30x 11% 172 252 36x OA 02 14 tOx 02 332 50% 712 02 Ox IS 502 OR 502 75% 64XI 402 x 9 /S.6 t" o 01313❑oo ❑ 013 0 000000 0100 130 0001300 4 Or 00 13 0000009 02 00 0 1 ❑COO ❑0 O s 00 ❑ 3 4 • ¢ � gg a m 4 3 fl a o. 0 o o � v F ° � S ° S R s 0 z 3 P DDOD s DDOD 01300 000❑ no t]D❑D all N0�4! 0 as 1 g. • r ❑❑❑❑om o 1300009 ❑0000N 001300Z 00000C s =r v, 3� ^� 8 �g o vg� 5 =0 2.3 S YYmm = Samoa 5� 0131301 001313 9' E 13000 0 5 3 s 6 dQO 1, 3 Zs ao c 0"1 �. v r -1 � -, �s S _3�3`" r gR = "gigs EPa� o so3Q8 0 0:3130 r 00008 $ u3 €� o a a 5aa z:B w • 3 •,I,.9 °a lam% 10 i n m� �= Q3 1 � �2 I � a v g T 000„ ;CO 0ri0 D O Mow � 000 Z, ❑000 i:w Om v n age Q Y gg� i ❑❑ � g S iqq 2 13 3 013 3° n r .y =aO T c f� Ct 0 O C i I 4 i 1� i `a �s M:. 8098 T 709, 609,1 so% 4ox 30R 20X 1091 090 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1I 12 i 1S f CMrt1 98 Fann;a sp. by Quadrant iii cn.r.2 R Breeding by Quadrant 5055 459 .�- 409 359 309 25X 209 15% 109 5R 09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 12 /%5-7 i® I ON 9076 60R 70X 6OR 50R 403 30R 20X 10R OR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 1 Clwrt 3 9 Unapproved Refuse by Ouadrant 't P a 13 I . r' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF IREPORT DATE: December 18, 1985 TO: City Council V :ity Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Nubbs, City Engineer BY: Laura Psomas, Land:;cape Designer SUBJECT: ARL:::BALD AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT ABSTRACT: The Archibald Avenue Conceptual Design is being submitted for approval. Such approval will permit more site specific designs required for working drawings. BACKGROUND On November 26, a public workshop was hod by the Engineering Division to present the Archi' lid Avenue Conceptua Design and gain oncepts, public input. Planning After reviewing these approved inputs the and the November 27, 1985. The attached Planning Commission staff report incluces more specific infnrmation regarding the proposed scope of work along Archibald. A summary of public co ments from the workshop is also provided. Sidewalk improvements from other funds are also currently scheduled for Archibald Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base line Road. An approval of the Beautificatiens Concepts is necessary to speed coordination of landscaping and sidewalk Installation in this area along Archibald Avenue. RECOMMENOATIOC It is recommended that city Council approve the Archibald Avenue Conceptual Design. Res ectrutly s nnitted, V� LeC,. P.jam Attachments � Y — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 27, 1985 T7: Planning Commission I FROM: Liuyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Laura Ps-Vas, Laidscane Designer SUBJECT: ARCHIBALD AVENUE REAUTIFICAT1Oil PROJECT ABSTRACT: The Archibald Avenue Conceptual Design is being submitted by the Mg eering Division for review and acceptance of the plans rod requests the Planning CO=Iss.on to give direction to proceed to City Council. °. ;C.<GROUND: The scope of twprovemelts shell extend along the cast and west s es o rchibald Avenue from 4th , treet to the soute to the foothill Freewcy on the north. Conceptual designs attached deal with major gateway treatments, sewndary identity elements at major street crossings and several treatments of common frontage situations (see Exhibit.: 1 through 6). The design concepts incorporate an extensive use of stone, reflecting the historic character of the Methodist Church. The major gateway walls reflect northeastiocorne� of Base Line Road and Archibald AveennuG.ingThe nstonee theeme shall also be seen in the residential areas in the form of rock pilaster columns linked by open tubular fencing: To the greatest degree possible, existing landscape treatments will be retained. Supplemental tree planting at existing developed sites will serve to integrate those projects into the overall design theme. The selected street tree is the Sycamore. Accent trees at designated areas are the Crape Myrtle, Evergreen Pear and Pepper. Gateway the Sweet Gum. trees are the 3elecate Pine and Funding for this project has been obtained through the City Beautification fund. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The ort — i eT and notices were sent to all property owners whose land bores e pro ec area. Notices were also sent informing property owners of A public l also workshop regarding the proposed beautification. Supplomentat notices were posted along ArCilbal, Avenue within the Proposed scope of work. 0 PLANNING CO MISSION STAFF REPORT Archibald Avenue Beautification Project November 27, 1985 Page 2 P.ECOlMEh0ATION: Staff reconnends that the Pialning Co=ission review and approve the Archibald Beautification concept and recomend approval to City Council. Respectfully suoitted, j� LBN: .jaa Attachments: 1. Landscape Sire Plan - Conceptual Design 2. Identity - Conceptual Design 3. School Frontage - Conceptual Oesitn 4. Parkway - Conceptual Design 5. Grade - Conceptual Design 6. Retro: Residential - Conceptual Design ,3 's OF PO ONVUHMIES a MINMMAT GObaq°a 4s MM ARCHBALD AVENUE BEAU FmATIDN twi or im RANCHO CUCAMOA'CeA, UOYU 101 Rpr, b um�rarTrJ1w111tlWUra.RRU all alu.doa alal.a na as rfwivarwo lucrwaw w11w� u rvllra uaarva111a 1 aamrornwrn Ira nua M lrr aaHrogl HwrJrtiep avlrwo 1:o111awuuonwnlwa: u u •aw warm uaarwun�aaw rta111a1p a'� �c�w�ar cattar a 01ruYCIM 1 a+arv.a talGt ratara11aa1111a1 1 tlenlpylr lal..Ed i r,WRRgT 1 COrO • UaIM MIar Mapdity OayRprlpli 10 t 11 r1CJNraprypar(ylpprry Ir slol Nla Ia Va Twr 11 raLr a�0 r 10 Cyll,y' p u vaun at It ®aal0 tm,vw as 1 i raa°iasl at woo, 18 ratJMrwr as Ylnunlan rwllrAas is aaM1.1 JLlaaalar It oasluorograayCp�aya 111a pM4�ta�p 10��[aa�1pll��yy W 4�1rba4pluMllO It NrY Ia Ir01tN Tariy a ralro ur WWAGilr1r10 u r�TM 9� roar lux _aepny MAJOR GATEWAY VERTICAL COLUMNAR TREES OaM ✓YM3'LLSI arowR.Ae.A uTkwaw _ STREET TREE TNI'LE MP'+. iaglr+n.'aww� LCCOIT PLANTING !!� lY� SECONDARY INTERS11 TID71 IDENTURCAnG:1 SECONDARY DRERSECTON DENTNICATION ICCENT PLANRNO :. r i`,� ) LUOR GATEWAY CV%c cr`,lp! ubQ DIEZRO l " fCHSALD AVENUE BEAMIRCAMN ®crry OF a b R NCHO CUCAMONGA ,` a ,,-- ' , W AS - \TRI14t. CQ1NMil�L]� ' \ • CTY YA U I•YT.1t -RAiL OII TLU '. �� � (ILNIITI MAIy L Atq MAJOR GATEWAY SECONDARY IDENTRY BEHI M comcEPTUAL MUM ARCHIBALD AVENUE BEAUTIMCATION RCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A 2 4 B tt ■ ■ \\ ■ \tYYY�gt I'If utN WOM"OnVivas N= mass •�1 •h 8LL 1' . C CHC EIP UAL DD EOURnl ARCHSAW AVENUE BEAUTIRCATION ®CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3r, ?s :02; 7 �i MS7010 STRUCTURES I� EXISTTND COMMERCIALAHMSMAL DEVELOPMENT n r,r ......... ...... W'DEVELOPED LAND OOHMPTUA, DEEM( mi ARCHBALD AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION CITY Or `V RANCHO CUCAMONGA Vu 1.; 0. I IARtNAY MIII OIPQT TKfAN)tyy - --- •- •.+wwrcw wALL AT PARKWAY U(McEpTubu 01m) gm ARCH BALD AVENUE BEAUTRCATION ®CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1120 9)n .:7 n,w . . . .. . .. . . . ... . x I- :.ov FENCE AND PILASTER AT EIRSTINO RESIDENTIAL METHOD RESOMMAL OOMPTUXA 1 DE 898H 0 ARCHIBALD AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION CITY Or " RANCHO CUCAMONGA ■ f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: November 27, 1935 TO: Chairman and Meabers of the Planning Commission FROM: Laura Psomas, .andscape Designar SUBJECT: ARCHIBALD AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION Y s 61 1 rvn On Tuesday, November 26, 1985, a workshop was held to familiarize property owners along Archibald Avenue with the proposed Beautification Project. Approximately twenty -five property owners came to view and comment on the proposed design. Most of the property owner's concerns were in regard to visibility, sound mitigation, maintenance and costs. These and other more specific concerns are listed on the following page. Overall, it seemed as though the Archibald Beautification Co,cepts made a favorable impression. LP:jaa Attachments � `�5,'.S�' 1�.1 r sn� , �� � . ♦ .i -.NJ Y�r�Ey`4.T� z :i ■ - Will there be adequate visibility with the proposed trees? Their locations near driveways, mailboxes and utility boxes should be considered for sight lines - The trees should not be costly to maintain or cost property owners additional maintenance. - Will accent trees and walls block business visibility at intersection:;? Can these applications be individually tailored to aco modate the reeds of each property owner as well as the City? - Can evergreen trees be used instead of deciduous? - Some homeowners will lose sound oarrier plantings they Mve installed. Will the City help to relate them or help mitigate sound in an equivale.it or better way? Entry monsmentatlon appears to go beyond the right -of -way. Are property owners required to pay for this? Will land be dedicated? Who will maintain this? - Once established, the City should make the phasing schedule public. - Can homeowners request their property be beautified early in planning? - Some residences are located especially close to Archibald Avenue. To dedicate land and have sidewalks installed would reduce their privacy even more. Can siwcial consideration be given, where such instances occur, to provide walls in these cases? - 11111 the City safeguard vandalism or repair areas th:_ have had irrigation systems broken and plants stolen? - Can utilities be put underground? - Can there be more meetings to handle needs on an individual basis? - Other historical sites should be noted with accent planting and special treatment. - The school districts need to be more involved 4ith the actual design process. The Central School District has the follcwi spcific concerns regarding proposed designs at their school: e o There is a need for restriping of parking behind the planter area to accommodate parking as shown. F M,: v o Parking adjacent to the school frontage also needs to be restriped to aconmodate parking as shown, with spaces eliminated north and south of the pedestrian crossing to accomuodate bus parking, o Trees should be eliminated at the driveways to provide adequate site distance for the bus drivers. -. 4Y 711 o Parking adjacent to the school frontage also needs to be restriped to aconmodate parking as shown, with spaces eliminated north and south of the pedestrian crossing to accomuodate bus parking, o Trees should be eliminated at the driveways to provide adequate site distance for the bus drivers. -. 4Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 18, 1985 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Como nity Development SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO GUNERAL PLAN APPLICATION CYCLE At its December 4, 1985 meet'ng, Council denied General Plan Application 85 -04D (Hawkins) but allowed a reapplication on a General Plan fee waiver. The applicant has expressed concern that waiting until the next General Plan Amendment cycle for a new application would cause undue hardship and has requested special consideration to expedite the application process. The applicant intends only at this tine to apply for the General Plan Amendment (4 -8) category and later develop specific plans and request a development agreement to implement the 25 percent density bonus provided by State law. Inasmuch as the applicant only wishes the General Plan Amendment and no applications have been received for the current General Plan Amendment cycle (application deadline - November), staff can process such an application with little difficulty, espe- cially since analyses have been done on the site vis- -vis the two previous amendments. RECOMtEHDATION: If the Council agrees with processing the app cat an now for the reasons stated above, adoption of the Resolution would be in order. Resfectfujljyjsubmitted, Director JL:Jk Attachment: Resolution a 0 Illa=oP W. 69 -112 - t A am Tm or in G21t =gm a = cm Or mcm cuemomol. G.Lllolsil. RTism Tu Anl= GORY tt" AMumm I ulm olft] 1 VEDMI State lav ally» aitisa N o.amd w I.% of m. onss+l Plm • sasian ar four tlns pw roarl sed WOW. to Mmioi Coons »m us nn»od atl naaamd.d sppr l of the, Prep"" tarisimsl W Y W. the Ctr Ca u has mMida -d mo o..a for a mu Gat.r.l rlm ls.alamt lwrlas sea.ado toe Lad a.N olsamt .a.oEasatai s an N r"o t & m.»L pba rYma>•sat putllo`a»rlos m as t1&a.lrobu U, emltr MV, fs00o9t. 6 1S -Esn � tC.t ms Gltr of P..paa Oxam-0 atr Coumtl Aus Csnar astatlSaa Mrls.J ~ml 71. Assedaaat Carlos "-a fm laed r» aa.adsmts sed do"l s A. 9- .aul u follayst 3=0 It ' m m. ei..edar rasr 1929. 1 A. 1Ls ZIA O.st/ms ar We 11min5 oomisnoa Ia too mom a t.oaarr tall CI a.taalaa" se a Gooanl fl. la.edamt us # "to. la. d.»llao for svabittal sa11 N m tslsr tlaa Slop p.s. m save 19. a. The Zed roust of the PLmias Gom!»to+ !e My sa11 N oataelisu'+A u a G.a.nl H. W t autos "to. $o dssdisN for .".Itul Wall N m lstar t"am ll.5 P.S. m theta 19. G. 1N 2r4 wttos of too Plsacas Comlanm a NptosNr sa11 N vstaCl.'Wasd » a tl.o^ot rloa lasadasat Carlos daN. As dw611N C" M. ttsl salt N m latm tWa July 19. o. 1 s sdditioeAl m.itms Of t o Pl '"I C d Slab be ,.r en.nd.r r•ar w mtassaarr m A "to a W'atls N to runates aeanm. Sl= W 2. A the ormt ao mrl»aamtal lsput npart L r.yuir d prlar N P a Qat»lm Met" of a AeNnl ?Iu lasedNat smucatlm. »Sd 0 1r sass N bola at ms oast saNdulod G. l Plea A..aArtot uN aRC completion a tN up. PASS®, l"B=. sod AWYM tale lot dal o[ thy. 19N. Ai61 grutt. Suitst. NItau. 0 1. tug roe. ll N AsSlaf. ama ,Ipe P. ttWL. aVm' i . 1t1L9fs A. et. r •r / `� / 5.1.J:`ir_t,.-- _c- :n.,e�. . . f . - -.. - '.nti"'.a,�F 'l ■ 51: 3' 'e • f A• t t ltziattsa ft- 65.132 halt 2 T. SCMLT A. 20D.RR. CITE CLng T 63ymes, ao tuny �.� m a city ay 2th Ow+sp. tlet2 bsolatiat ns 611T quad, sy?tvtsd. aad adytal by tta City cao u or tta City ac ft m C4-=s , at s nsular stttisl or aat9 City Ca Ll MW m the 1tt da, ac N.Y. 1925. titaatad this tad CV at tLT, 1915 at haehe Qww;awdp, C+lt2artts. rel My a. W • R, CltT' trt u 4 177 -� .w RESOLUTION NO. '%5 -373 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING ITS RESOLUTION 110. 85 -132 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: Section IA of Resolution No. 85••132 of the Council hereby is amended to read as fellows: "The second meeting of the Planning Commission in the month of January shall be established as a General Plan Amendment hearing date. The deadline for submittal during calendar year 1985 shall be no late• than 5:00 p.m. on December 27. The dead- line for submittal during each succeeding calendar year shall be no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 15." PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 18th day of December. 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: �^a .` r4 CriT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT BATE: December 18, 1985 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senio^ Planner SUBJECT: ANNEKAT:ON OF PUBLIC LANDS IN THE CITY'S SPHME OF INFLUENCE STA At a recent City Council meeting, staff was asked to loos, into the feasiblity of annexing publicly controlled lands in the City's sphere of Influence. This report provides an initial response to tnat request, and attempts to put the various related issues into perspective. There are several closely related issues affecting future annexations of our sphere. These are idzntified in this report as Publicly Controlled Lands, Privately Controlled Lands, County Service Area 83, New Legislation, and Benefit /Burden Assessment. Publicl Controlled Lands: The sphere of influence contains approx ey , acres mat of land. Of that minter, approximately 2,500 acres is under some degree of public cartrol in the form of outright ownership or restrictive easements. The San Bernardino County Flood Control District controls by far the largest proportion of such land. Other public and semi- puolic agencies include Southern California Edison, the City of Los Angeles, and L.A. Hater 6 Power. The only public agency with,contrcl over substantial areas is the Flood Control District. The other agencies only control narrow corridors for the purposes of water and power trarruission. Informal discussions with LAFC staff indicate that in general terms, LAFC would be supportive of annexations in the City's sphere rovided such annexation proposals wouie reflect a logical extension o? ty boundaries and services. As xith any annexation request, the City would be asked to submit a justification for the request, such as pending urbanization and need for City services. Prijatet Controlled Lands: The mtV�rlty of acreage in our sphere 5f nfluence is privately controlled and subject to future development under the County's Nest Foothills Community Plan. As development pressures increase, the City will have the option of pursuing annexations in the County. This would require an active involvement on the part of the City in the planning phases of any .w r�9 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ANNEXATION OF PUBLIC LANDS December 18, 1985 Page 2 new development and participation by the development community in the annexation process. Count Service Area 83: The Local Agency Formation Commission TEV s current y considering a County proposal for the formation of a County Service Area (CSA 83) to overlay our sphere of influence. This proposal was initiated as a result of the Nest Valley Foothills Community Plan preparation process, and was partly the result of the City's concern that County development in our Sphere would be heavily dependent on City services. The purpose of CSA 83 rould be to provide street lighting and maintenance, park services, and trail development and maintenance. The County service areas, when estalilished, are controlled by their own boards appointed by the County Board of Supervisors. Creation of CSA 83 would in effect create another layer of government responsible for the provision of rather limited services. Though no formal action has so far been taken, LAFC has expressed a concern that the creation of another service area might in effect interfere or discourage future annexations to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as the City would no longer be the sole provider of the necessary public services. Staff has indicated to LAFC that the City world work with the County on developing an alternate solution to the problem of public services, with :he ultimate gmal of annexation of substantial portions of our sphere of influence to the City. New Le islation: Changes in State legislation dealing with annexat ons to Tocal agencies anJ special districts are going into effect as of January 1, 1986. The new legislation, known as the Cortese /Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, may have the effect of streamlining the annexation, procedures. Staff is working with the City Attorney's office to de`Prmine whet:ier these changes favorably affect the in4exa:ion process from the City's perspective Burden /Oenefit Assessment. In addition to dealing with the procedural and p`oTi75 — considerations, it will be necessary to consider the City's sphere of influence from a larger perspective, to determino which areas of the City's sphere of influence can be effectively served by the City, and to identify potential liabilities or the City's inability to provide necessary urban services in specific areas. Following such an assessment, the City would have the informition necessary to develop a comprehensive annexation policy. This aporoach could identify specific areas appropriate for annexations, general phasing of such annexations, and the necessary public services needed to accomsuodate specific projects. SUMAAARY. As mentioned, there ere numerous issues to be considered in connection with annexations in our sphere of influence. The Planning Divistan's work program for this fiscal year calls for the initiation of an effort leading to the development of an overall annexation ISO r CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ANNEXATION OF PUBLIC LANDS Oecember 18, 1985 Page 3 •1 + -9 strateg;•. This would involve work with property owners in the area, - special districts, San Bernardino County, LAFC, and others. When though information is generated to develop clearly identifiable options, it is staff's intention to go to the Council for specific policy direction. RECOHMENOAT:ON: No action is necessary at this point. However, the ty ounc may wish to confirm the approach outlined in this report or provide staff with appropriate direction. Res ective suwtt rad Buller City Planner BS:OX:ko y 4 /8'/ r•+iA. e� .d h J. z J� y ■ RE8D14OTION 10. 85 -207A A RESOLDTIOM Or :1M CSTT COUNCIL OF TRR CITY OF EARCRO COCAMCWA. CALIFOUTA, AFFROPIN AML1MUT3 To TIM SALARY RESOLUTICS 10. 85 -207 The City Cwncil of •Se City of Ranebo Cucamraaa California. hereby amends tesolution No. 85-207 as follows: SECTION 23 fgarative Na*ereret 9a1arY Raaggg 2005 City Planner 452 3,301 492 4,030 2339 Building Official 452 3,301 492 4,030 0250 AssLecaut City Nsaagdr 452 3,301 492 4,030 1159 Coay.,nity Service Dir. 456 3,367 496 4.111 0157 Adadn. Service Director 461 3,452 501 4,215 2109 City Paglueer 467 3,557 507 4,343 2459 Coess,oity 0,•!. Director 507 4,343 547 5,302 0259 City Kansger - -56,257.00 flat anoant -- Ezecutive Managerot aeple7sas will be a e tned to calory ranges which are co lase than 20T below the couttot point and ao more than 15T above the control point. Actual salary within tb, range is deterained ty perforruce, achievement of gosh and objectives, or for receut appointeents. 8rwth within the position. nn /f / PASSM. APPRttn'ED. and kDOPTPD this /&a"d y of W q Ax , 1985. Al J�7< Pc`I RoER, f38IDT,� . d Jon D. Nikes, Mayor s Y 1 December 18. 1983 CITY IN RANCHO COCAMOKA CITY COUNCIL MibUT►S A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga not on Wednesday, December 18, 1985, in the Lions Park Continuity Center. 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meetlag vas called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikela. Present veto CoueeLlmcabers: Paula J. Wright. Charles J. Buquot Its Niebatd M. Dabls Jeffrey Ling. and No" Jon D. Mdaels. Also present mores City Manager, Lauron M. Wasserseo; City Clark, Beverly A. Authe)it; Assistant City Attorney. Andres, Arcayaski; Assistant City Maaaser, Robert Rimso; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer. Loyd Bubb@; Comnity Services Director, Bill Soll.p. Approval of Minutest MOTICNt Moved by King, seconded by Dahl to approve the minutes of November 6. 1983; November 20. 1965; November 23, 1985. Motion car- tied 5-0 with Wright abstaining on the November 25th minutes since she vas ab- $ant). As 4 s e s e 2A. Thursday, Deeembac 19. 1p S5. 7s30 p.m. - PABK DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - Li- ons Park Community Center. 9161 Base Line Road. 2B. Thursday. January 2. 1986. 7t00 p.m. - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION - Lioos Park Community Center. 9161 Base Line Road. 2C. Thursday. January 2. 1986. 7:30 p.a. - CITY COUNCIL MINTING - Lions Park Com soity Center. 9161 Base Linn Road. 2D. Mr. Wasserman introduced Jim Rart, the am Administrative Services Dlree- tor. As s s s a s s Coaeeilsnn King requested that item 3L be rembavd for discussion. 3A. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 12 -18-85 and Payroll emd:cg 11 -24 -85 for the total anemone of $640.518.98. 33. Approval to forward Claim (CL85 -035) against the City by Glenn R. and Linda O) Parker for an automobile accident at the intersection of Archibald and Banyan Strut to insurance carrier. (0704-06 CLAIM) 3C. Approval to forward Claim (CL85 -036) against the City by Clayton W. (2) Dickinson, Jr.. for automobile damage on Davan Avenue, north of Foothill. northbound right lane, to insurance carrier. (0704-06 CLAIM) + 3D. Approval to forvard Clain (CLSS -037) sgaiset the City by Odeon Niemeyer for (3) automobile damsga on Raven Avenue, north of Foothill, northbound right lane. to C insurance carrier. (0704 -06 CLAIM) ' 31. Approval to forward Claim (CL83 -038) against the City by Eric 9. Walker for (4) automobile damage on Archibald in front of Frio Lay Plant (driving northboutd) .1 to insurance carrier. (0704 -06 CLkXKI Mieatas', , 1985 Page 2 •r 37. Approval to Iorvard Clain (CL65 -039) aLTainst the City by Joyce Davis frr automobile dams* at the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Lesson Avenue to Insurance carrier. (0704-06 '-=N) (6) 3C. Approval of Inprovemat Agrome3t and Impro smat Security for Parent Map 9498 located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Fourth Strut subait- ted by Rietar /Rink•,r. (0602 -01 AGREE IMPROVEMENT) RESOLUTION NO. 85 -334 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCBo COCAMOSWA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PARCEL NAP NU14M 949E (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 9498). IMPROVEMENT 4CRICKENTS AND IN- PROVEINT stcuRITSES (7) 31L Approval of Is,provemot Agreemot and Inprovemat Security for Parcel Map , 9416 (COP 8A-31) located on the northeast Corner of Haven and Hiablaed Avenues, submitted by Diversified Properties III Ltd. (0602 -01 ACRES IMPROVEMENT) CS3O.UTIO1 NO. 85 -335 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA APPROVING PARCEL MAP samon 9416 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9416). IM 07ENUT AGREEMENTS ADD IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES (8)(9) 31. Approval of Map, Inprovemat Agreemat and Improvemat Security and Lien Agreemat for Parcel Map 9318 located on the northwest corner of Haven and Ssv- eath Street submitted by Martin 1 rietta Cory. (0602 -01 ACRE6 I/L) (1002 -09 PARCEL MAP) RESOLUTION NO. 85 -036 A RESOLUTION OF 1NO CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUNOER 931E (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9318), IMPROVEMENT AGl3DM T AND IMMOVENEI SECURITY AND REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CCMIRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT (10) 3J. Approval of a Maintenance Contract (CO85 -126) for a Drainage Facility lo- cated on the northeast corner of Haven and Highland Avenues submitted by Lyanebaven Joint Venture. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) RESOLUTION 30. 85 -337 A RESCLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RMCC. CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR A DRAINAGE FACILITY FOR TRACT N0. 12922 (11) 3E. Approval of suamry vacation of a portion of Seventh Street at the north - vast corner of Haven Avenue and Seventh Street. (1110 -18 VACATION STREET) RESOLUTION iO. 85 -338 A RESOLUTION OF TM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA. SUMEARUT ORDERING IAN VACATION OF A PORTION OF SEVENIR STREET (12) 3L. Appraval to vacate a portion of Alsnmd Street hatvma Beryl dtrut and Aar thyst Avtmae. (Iran removed for discussion). (1110 -18 VACAIIOF STRHHr) RESOLUTION E0. 85 -339 4 RESOLUTION Of TEE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALI10E31A. DECLARING ITS INTENTION IO VACATE A PORTION OF ALMOND STREET DEWEEN HEM AND AMETHYST AVENUE 5C11:'S+a:.d$'C! - •`�' City Council'. Minutes December 18, 1985 Page 3 3M. Approval to release final waumentation cash deposits for '!tact Eon. 11173, (13) 11173 -1 and Tract No. 9472. (0602 -01 BuND RELEASE) Tract goo. 11173 and 11173 -1 $1,500.00 hat No. 9472 $4,200.00 3E. Approval of execution of Loss Agreement (0085 -127) harvest the City and (14) Philo Blame and Joanne Store. waste of APM 201 -083-47 and 201 -083 -49, for pay- Mot of annual sueuratt for Assessment District So. 84 -2, Alta Loma Channel Improvements. (0602 -01 ACRES LOAN) 30. Approvss of COIlettitn Services Contract (CON3-125) vitk Gems and (15) Associates foe the purpose of collections of delinquent accounts. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) 3P. Approval to roles* model home sales office cash deposit for Tract 11173 to (16) M. J. Brock 6 Sons, Inc. (0602 -01 BOND RELEASE) Cash Deposit $2.500.96 3Q. Approval to accept the Bep• 'a&. .n,% Lions Park Redev lopme.ot Project. (17) (1404-06 PARE DEYELOPMIa'1') RESOLUTION NO. 85 -340 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIT OS RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TEN P7bLIC IMPROVEMENTS YOH THE BERYL PARS AND LIONS PARR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 3R. Set public bearing for January 13, 1966, for Environmental Assessment and j18) Devalopmert Code Amendment 85 -04, City of Rancho Cucuauga. (0203 -05 DC AMEED- NENT) 35. Set public hearing fox January 13, 1986, fo- Eavirodwatal Assessment and (19) Indust, Let Area Specific Plan Ameadment 83 -05, City of Rancho Cucamonga. (0203 -05 ISP AMENDMENT) 3T. 'let public bearing for January 15, 1986, for Development Coda Amendment (N) 85-'6. (0203 -05 DC AMENDMENT) MOfIONt Moved by Suquet, amended by Debt to approve the Consent Calendar aS- n..s item 3L. MO[LOO CArried enanicously 5 -0. Discussion of item 3L, Approval to vacate a portion of Almond $treat between Beryl Street and Amethyst Aveaus. RESOLUTION 10. 85 -339 A RESOLUTION CJ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COONIT OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF ALMOND STREET BETWEEN BERYL AND AMZTBTST AVENUE Councilmen Ring stated that this is an Intent to Vacate a portion of Almond be- tween Beryl and Amethyst. It seem that pertiou of Almond a" not be necessary for purposes of vehicular ingress and egress in that Almond vast of Beryl is provided for at a "Joe trail. Be did mot feel comfortable with the ioforms- tiou provided of vacating the City's intention of using Alwad east of Beryl as a continuation of the Trail System. Be would like to have the item continued to come back with more information on the topography of the land involved and the land out of this. It should go to the Trails Committee to see if it could be used in the future as a viable portion of 4 trail. Councilman Dahl expressed that this portion of Almond is meter planned in the '; mm, �'0.�'ci'.City- s-Cwu�l?Mti�tee`ry � >�::'� - ,eM��•"�� II% Daea:b.r raga 4- •' - CO,vral Plan as part of th& Ai ehw, would Trail System. A vacation of the property an ld go against what the General Plan calls for for that area. He also expressed that this should go to the Trail@ Committee first. Mr. Hobbs stated 04 page 73 of the Agenda abwa tba tract layout. The sorticq under discussion vacates fZOO the eul -de-see east &erase Lot A. As y.v go north an seryl, there to • Lester Stratt which stubs Late Lot A which is intend- ed that this would go auto the Canyom area and eventually ccuuect with Lot a across the Canyon area and provide a links&* within the basic. Lot A is a psrt of tb* Demons debris vamp. That@ is a precipitous drop off on Almond Street at the and of that cul -drat. There is about a 20 foot bluff which drops straight down. It vcu14 be a real problem maintaining something through the vasb area. This is an Latent to vacate which sets a public bearing In the Mention Council would have as o7por;.aity to look at thin. Mr. Vaasarmsa suggested tatting the psblic hearing for January 13 and if fufor- metioe is cot available from the Tb.dls Committea at that time, than Council ` cculd coutiuu* the bearing at thit tin. MOTIONt Moved by Bahl, seconded by Iluquat to Oct the public hearing data for January 13 and approve i�ea 3L. Motion carried by fulleuieg votes ATESt Wright. n:.ouat. M�.kels. Dahl HOES: King ASSENTs None e,s*, ee 4. aDyEane� npgr.t RwmeimCFl (21) 4A. &EDE18t OtDIL1i IgC7 Of SBt CISr Or RLrgD CDC& A IR)OAin a ZtC7 CB►O1S Review of a wuaieg Policies Report, as required by Internal Rovsou& Code Sat - tien 1034, ae Said report relates to the boudcg policies which are to be used in cOOjunetlon with the Redevelopment Agency' a Mortgage load Program. Staff report by Jack Lam, Comauniry D@v@lopmeot Director. (0203 -06 RDA) Mayor Mikal& opened the men ting for public basing. There being no reeoou..a, the public bearing was closted. City Clark Authelat read the title of Resolution No. S5 -341. RESOLUTION 90. 85 -341 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiT! COUNCIL OF THE CIrr OF RANGED CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA APPROVING HOUSING POLICY DEPORT OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Or INN CITY 01 KANCHO CUCAMONGA. OEDRE IMTENNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 103A AND DIRECTING ITS PUBLI- CATION MOTIONS Moved by King, s,,aaded by Dahl to approve Resolution go. 83 -341 mad waive full reading. Motion tarried unanimously 3 -0. •Orr *a (22) 4E. L'I14 py N/tC PO COCL•�ntCA /nitS2 P f - RrfOkT - gapiw Of a Housing rolleis' ROPOtt. ac required by the Internal lavasua Condo Section 1of as Said report relates to the housing policies shish are to be used in conjunction with the City's Mortgage &Owasso* bond Program. Staff report by Jack gem, Community Development Director. (0203 -06 RDA) Mayor Mikele opened the watiog for public bearing. There being no reopen,,, the public hearing vex, closed. City Clark Authelet read the title of Resolution go. 85 -342. t1 City Council Minutes December 18, 1983 Page 3 RESOLUTION 90. 83 -342 A RESOLPT10R u: Tsn CITY COOK ^IL (Q T(B CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, 4PP107130; HOUSIEG POLICY REPORT U?MER INTERNAL RE►ENCE CODE SECTION 1O3A AND DIUSCTING ITS PUBLI- CATION MOTIONi Moved by Wright, secandad by Buquet to approve Raseluriva No. 83 -342 eel waive full reading. Motion carried unsainvisly 3 -0. * ♦ .. At * 4C. YA1e AND ITC RATION LAID OFDICATI(M ORDINARCE ARM12UIY — proposed owed— (23) rats to Chapter 16.32 of the Rancho Cucamags Municipal Coda pertaining to the dedication of Park and Recreation Land to a condi-iou of subdivision. Staff report by Bill Bolley, Community Servica■ Director. (1404 -03 PARR) Mayor Mikels opened the mestieg for public bearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. _ Mayor Mikels asked do we leave this at 302, do we reduce it since we are aliminatiog the requirement, at do we require that the amenities provided equal tSe City standards? Councilman Buquat stated that the amendment has gone through considerable aawnr of work by the Chamber and devolopasunt industry. Be was surprised that* wasn't anyone present lobbying for one of the options available. He wanted some input which brought this item about. Mr. Holley responded that it was a philosophical issue; primarily the three acre limitation. Home did not feel this to be economically fair to the small developer as compered to the medium and large developer. Mayor Mikels statsi that the ordinance as written does not contain the larguage which was included in the staff moo: emotions of 302 credit is iutact, and it has left "maybe" instead of "shall be ". Hut, it is silent as to the etr.cdards which the private amenities would hive to be met in order to get private open apace credit. The question is, does the Council want to mm%e ehangoa other tban simply eliminAting the three core standard? One of the things to look at is the total impact on the park financic= requirements. If loft vide open, he felt that every development will request sow form of open space. Mr. Bugast stated this was the reason be questiosed Mr. Holley regarding this. Be recalled that whoa he was first contacted regarding amenditg this ordinance the objection at that tiro was the three acre minimum. So was hesitant to go beyond that consideration at this time. Councilman Debt stated that if we eliminate the three acre aLaimue, ova will be opening the door for a large number of dnelopments to request park fee credits. If we Siva up a percentage of the park fees, then he felt we should also make further requirements of the park teas that if they do want to receive this consideration and are a culler development, then they should bee to meat some criteria in order to obtain those park fees. Ve need to look at whether we vent to give a full 301 park credit? He did not fed we should allow up to 302 credit; a 331 would be fine which would be more acceptable providing that the equipment furnished would be at City standards. Mayor Hikels stated the proposed ordinance was silent as to whether any more open space is going to be provided. All they base to do is put in a tot lot, a barbeque, and a owismvg pool which may already have been provided in any event to market the project. The ordinance doasn't require any additional open space; only requires that the amenities be put somewhere in the project. Council ova Buquat stated char what we are tryicg to do is provide some equity for those developers who •r, coming in with smeller projects that have to most the same term and conditions as larger developers. The larger developers are able to provide the park improvements In lieu of the fees. Ty 1 ? °,nl�$firy•�9:' �"Ti City. r- � ?'"`t¢;: ;c,��yr, ,_.a._ r ,y.�..: ;�yi''1. • ,, C +•• r. ty filet 196steo i s i _age 6 fi ' Mayor Mikels stated that we aced to know the total impact of a reduction on out .. park development ford and sear met criteria. Be felt the its& should be can- ticked A.a order to obtain tbis information. MOTION: Moved by King, secoadad b7 Dabl to continue to February 19, 1986. Ma- tian carried unsataously 3.0. ORDINANCE ■O. 30SD (first reading) AN ODDIMAUCE OR TRA CITY 07 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AME1DX1G SUSESCTION E 07 SECTION 16.32.030 OE THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO BARK AND RECRRATIONAL LAND DEDICATION R1QOAI191EVrG • r a r e 5• 1NDN- A09QTISm let .a 1 (24) 5A. c aECTION Op NONICIP L CODE — ma Ordinance Correcting adanumbering of Sections w!tbin the Municipal Code. (0701 -13 CODE) - Mayor Mikels opened the mating for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing mar closed. City Clark Authelat read the title of Ordinance No. 283. ORDINANCE NO. 281 (second readiog) All ODUARr.E OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 241. PERTAIN- ING TO OFFENSES AStMST POLICE DOGS. AND ORDINANCE 30. 257. PERTAINING TO USE OF ALCOHOL IN PUBLIC PLACES, AND AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE RANCEO COCANOw4A MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A WIN CHAPTER 9.16 ISrTLED "CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL TO PUBLIC PLACES ". NO A BMW CRU M 9.18 WTITLND "MISCE(LANNOUS 07PENSES." MOTIOD: Moved by Wrigbt, seconded by Bugaee to waive full reading of Ordinance go. 281. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Councilman Debi stated be will be votiag "oak on the Ordinance in order to be consistent math the province motion in which be was opposed to drinking in pub- lic perks. MOTION• Mmed by Buqust, seconded by Wright to approve Ordinaac: No. 283. Ma- clue carried by following vote: AYES: Wrigbt, Buquet, Mikalm, King 80981 Debi e s e a e e Mayor Nikels called a races& at 8150 p k. Tic meeting reconvened at 9:05 p m. with all members of Council present. e 9 e a e e (25) -6 A. Mr. Wasserman aunouvted that there had been a request to continue this item. We will be notified when they want to address Council. C e! i e a e City Council Minutes '?+v...•%``` ' December 18, 1985.' Page 7 _t h 63. asnOnr 1lOM GITT���j(, -TO It- aL1D 1r rat cxR cpp[ct� IcAm7tt: rYe wLAfIst mT margin +LJ10AI, (26) OT A L rm rn tteBM1n7 -WAY ,s ) COUNT, OUNT. Staff re- port by Lauren Wasserman, LYty Manager. (1160 -10 RNQOBST) Mr. Aresymski, Assistant City Attoraey, stated his reeomrudatioa to Council Would be that based on the liability exposure in the public right -ofwsy that the basketball goal be removed as soon as possible. Mr. aabibl. 7816 Parlite Court, pointed out that the basketball court has been there about four years. It was there Wham he bought bit boost. It van his neighbor who complained to the City. ACTION: Council directed staff to have this removed ietrdiately. * A * * * * 6C. ADTWI12ATIM TO CarmOCT L atnovtr /rlrr COUt t >z rn WOIIeAroP tt (27) 1956. Staff report by Lauren Waiserman. City Manager. (0501 -03 COgICRCICE) Mr. Wasserman stated we would like to sutgast the date of Saturday, January 25tb for an Excellence Workshop for Council and Mama=ement Employees. Money Was iocluJod in the budgct. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dabl to A,prove the request for a Work- shop on Saturday, January 25th. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. ♦ace *• 6D. REPORT p[ON CIIT ATTnng Ry- ♦e�i4' 7NYOONOtmG On -rat -C An WtazcL * (28) Staff report by Lauren Wasseruo, City Manager. (1301 -00 SIIRIP/) Councilman Dahl stated he would be in favor of the alternatives recommanded in Captain Puteber'n memo dated November 22, 1985. MOTIONt Moved by Dabl, seconded by Whole to approve Captain Putcher's recom- tmndation oft 1. Croatia„ r special patrol district for the affected area and assign a Patrol nfficer with the Station's four-wheel drive vabielt, an tun days and timas when violations are meat likely to occur. (To be used when personnel are available and when it vruld not adversely affect the routine patrol); and 2. Coat(aue to respend to c4114- for - service from citiaems. Kotion carried ucsaimounly 5 -0. • * f : TArru OO.T 6[. uRl A GOTZATW GOtitIGT POt COMmrta 9rrrd UT TH OLPimONNIU& r nnwe INSTTTUTI (pg) (Egg?). Staff report by Jack Lam, Community Developmant Director. (0602 -01 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Melt to approve the selection of r9RI to develop the data managemsut #yet" within the $167,000 budget and direct staff to prepare the requisite contracts for approval of the @yet" design study and hardware /software contracts on the January 15th City Council Agenda and approval of the custom programming /traiaiog contract on or before April 16. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. ** * * ** ' 6l. UPDATE M yRCION CONTROL. ACITYTTI S, Oydata presented by consultant, Cana Zdacw0 i. 1140+ -11 VECTOR CONTROL) AXON: Council received Std filed the report. 1" ** ** ** i� ' city Coaacil- %cember 18, 1 Page a (31) 6C. llm0laT 1 NPgL M!K}11 TD LIAn a }D¢ EOl Am R}ti rD NQ}T ^E Oti —ITY ZAW, (0100 -00 AOCDIIBTRATION) MOTION( Moved by Ling, secimded by Buquat to set December 26 at 9 a.m. to the City Managei • conference room. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. we aaaa (32) 68. Design concepts Vera prasantad Jy tba consultant from pore. MOTIONt Moved by Weight, seconded by Buquet to appro7a the Archibald Avetua Beautification Dasi6n concepts. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. a aaaaa (33) 61. AMMURAT Tn VIVINA1, Eu• AVWTrjkls Cv (020) -03 OBDaMAL PLAN) City Clark Autbalat read title of Resolutiou No. 35 -343. RESOLUTION NO. 85 -343 A RESOLUTION OF TSB CITY COUNCIL OF TS! CITY or gMCfi CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA AMENDING ITS RESOLUTION 30. 85 -132 MOTIONt Moved by Boluses seconded by Mikels to approve Resolutit,n Has 85-343 and waive full reading. Motion care /ad unanimously 5 -0. (34) 7A. a a At At ► • a� u..n i• (07 2'-02 -All vest N) nnOaaCS. Staff report by Otto anner. (0702 -02 IIATION) Mayor Mikels concurred with Mr. Rroutil that we shcsld be looking at the over- all picture and not try to aanaz piecemeal. Councilmen Debi stated that the mejorit7 of the land is am being bald by the County flood Control District. Tha proolem he has is that web of that land is going to be vacated as flood Control Properties and will be pur,.bas 4 by pri- vcte land developers. When that take. place, then the City's ioput sod ability to .ontrol the type of development in that area will be limited. MOTIOBt Moved by Cabl, seconded by Buquat to direct staff to continue with the lcitial Annm&tiou request; ask. 40 icguiry with the County to sae what their Position is going to be regarding our request in } specific 2500 acres. lock at tb• overall picture; proceed with the contacts with private property wears to ano= their p.•ojects into .Ie City; look at LAEC'n proposal of astabliahin4 a County Service Area in the Sphere; and come back early cart Calendar year with some alternatives of what the City's options are. Motion tarried unanimously 5 -0. a a a a a* (35) 78. DISCOAAICa AND DI2ECTICR TO CITY JLUORNET !CARDING M WURNIR AT RMDEeT OF COUNCILMAN DA46 Report by Andy City Attarnwy. (0704 -00 LNCAL) Mr. Atcrynaki stated that be bad obtained a copy of the Comer ordinance re- garding the regulation of cabarets, night clubs with entertainment, ate. City Council Mlntltea:wl December IS, 1983.x,: page 9 a R Ther have also aoaiyded the City's aeaieg ordinances and dnalopwat code. They fraud that the only thing we were nLsslng was a maperete antartaiowot licensing process which wigbt be applicatle to eshbllshrats that serve Glen- The beverages. The Dower ordinauce aocludes sntertatnwut regulation., adult uses, liquor zegalatiooa, :OJitL0oa1 nag permit type procedures. Iron that prospective the ordiaaace vouad not stand sses in California. 1 Tot of the is- era ABC type iosuu ekteb tea City ,tin or no control. ' If the intent is to try to reactors eutartniowat, other than thou already " regulated by the t:oda, thou that would not be difficult to do. Councilmen Dahl stated that 009 of the reareas be brought the cabaret licensing idea forth, which is a wtbod of costzct not a method of keeping out certain type. of besinassea from the City, tbat it could - �ulato entertainment type of bualceseea rbare there my be some law aaforcaaeat pr.bl.w. We could act sow type of criteria an to what point Iv tia a license vould be subject to bev&landoa of stead lieaoaa. This would be a method o! control which would cot. ha aimed at juts adult amendment rights. typs of entertainment which would act fall under first ACTION, Council directed city attorney to .raft an ordinance for Cotlau lank at which would regulate entertainment. il to a t e. a a MOTION: Moved oy ring, seconded by Arigbt to adjenro to a closed session to discuss persanoel matters and disposal of property at the iutsr.actioo north of 6tb Street and Nnf°alo and to recOtmena on December 26, 19874 Motion tarried unnaLmaualy 5-0. Ito meeting adjourned at 30143 p.m, and reconvened at 11120 p-a. All :esbars of Calncil were present. (0310 -00 6ALf1Y dD,7o8TaFtYj °°"°L`so` °��Oi "x v "- (36) DNSRATIW 80. 83 -207A A RESOLOi .d OF TAR CITY COUPCIL 07 INS CITY OF & MCeO COCkNWOA. CAL "01A. APP20V1W AM2 MMENTS TO TC3 SALARY p23OLOTION NO. 83••107 MOTION: Moved by Dahl* secaaded by Saquat to approve Resolution Mo. 83••207A. Motion carried by the fellouicg votes AYIS: Suqu.t. Mi►els. Dahl, Clog NOLgt Wright ASSINTs None ASSTAINt gone MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Wright to adjoura. Notion carried unanimously 3.0. The meeting adjourned at 11323 p. m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly I. Autbelat city Clark Approved: February 3, 1986