Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/05/07 - Agenda Packet�GtLn.NOA _ OF c C A1pNCARANC W CU CITY COUNCIL O 0 AGENDA t977 Lion, P•zk Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamongaa California All items submitted for tbs City Cessail Aganda coat be in — iting• The deadline for submittiOt p.m. them Vednesday print to the meeting. The City A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Mikels —. Buquet Ring —� Dahl _, and Wright A. Wednesday. May 16. 1986 - 7:00 p.m. - PLAM31NG COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Canter. 9161 Baae Liam Road. B. Thursday, May 15. 1986 - 7:50 p.m. - PAW DRpgLOPMEOT COMMISSION - Lions Park Cowwai C) Canter. 9161 Base Line Road. C. Presentation of a Proclametion to the Alta Lama Arms Soccer Team commending their achievement in Wearing all other Southern California teams in rinsing the 1986 State of California Cup Championship- -. 1 City Couacil Meeting -2- May 7, 1986 D. Presentation from Officer MsCruffs the "Crime Prevention Dog", to In 'N Out Burger for their support of Rancho Cucamonga Ctime Prevention efforts. j. GOrBOT CIANDL The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be roetine and net- controversial. They will be acted up" by the Council at ate time without discussion. A. Approval of Minutes: March 5, 1986 31 ) Beer 6 Wine Eating Place Licease, Tsukumi, Mary Take, April 14, i986 15 April 16, 1986 Receive Claim (CL 86 -19) against the City by Leroy 16 B. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 5 -7 -85 and Payroll 23 ending 4 -11 -86 for the total amount of $2,209,810.00. F. C. Alcoholic Beverage AppQxatiom No. AS 86 -05 for 29 T Off -Sale Beer 6 Wine E ting Place License, Joe's 41 Market, Chong Suk 6 Jung Je Kin, 9124 Foothill Boulevard. g. Approval of Comma Use Agreement between the San D. Alcoholic Beverage Application No. AB 06 -06 for On -Sale 31 Beer 6 Wine Eating Place Licease, Tsukumi, Mary Take, 8760 Bate Lice. E. Receive Claim (CL 86 -19) against the City by Leroy 33 Malcolm Sbaw, Jr. for personal injuries near Etivanda High School. F. Receive Claim (CL 06 -20) against the City by Eeatb 35 Edward Thompson for personal injuries on Big Tree Road. C. Receive Claim (CL 86 -21) against the City by Pacer 41 games, Inc. for storm drain procedures of Tract No. 12532. g. Approval of Comma Use Agreement between the San 44 Bernardino County Flood Control District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction, operation and maintenance of a new reinforced concrete box culvert for Leone Avenue across the Alta Loma Channel. RESOLUTION 80. 86 -112 50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMOHGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A rt COMMON USE AGREEMENT FROM THE SAN BMARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING ':(" THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME Y City Council Meeting -3- May 7, 1986 I. Approval to declare APN 229 - 261-64 as surplus property 51 and direct staff to advertise such for sale by the submission of sealed bids to be received on May 20, 1986 in the office of the City Clerk. A $90,000 minimum bid is required. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -113 52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO SELL FEE TITLE TO CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DESCRIEED HEREIN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURES SPECIFIED BEREIN J. Approval of two Subordination Agreements for Parcel Map 57 8100 located in the northeast corner of Ramona Avenue and Foothill Boulevard submitted by Kantor and Foothill Property. RESOLOTIO1w, 86 -114 63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TWO SIBORDINATION AG2EEMENTS FROM KABTOR AND FOOTHILL PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLZRK TO SIGN SAME K. Approval of Contract Change Order No. 1 to CO 85 -119 in 64 the amount of $2,000 for pavemert evaluation@ for Lions, eoutara, Selma. Leucite and Klus"u. L. Approval of Contract Change Order No. 2 to L.A. 66 Waiowcoet S Asawistes, Inc., for CO 85 -122 for Hermosa Avenue videning and Hamilton Street Extension. The Change Order to the &=net of $11,894 is for the preparation of a Parcel Map required to obtain certain rights -of -way for the street videning. M. Approval of Contract Change Order No. I for Project No. 70 $00 -84 -26 Lemoo Avenue from Archibald to Hermosa to C.P.S. Colaulting Civil Engineers in the amount of $1.160 bringing the total contract amount to $35,360. Such vmrk•ogs are being funded from Gas I" Account 11- 6637 -81(7. (CO 85 -067) i ., � A City Council Meeting —4— May 7. 1986 N. Approval of Agreement for Public Improvements and 73 Dedication between Ermal E. Osborne and Katbrya B. Osborne and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street frontage improvements at 6295 Archibald Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -115 79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING An AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMEnTS AND DEDICATION FROM ERNAL E. AND KATHRYN B. OSBORNE AND AUTHORIZING TEE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK IO SIGN SAME 0. Approval of Agreement for Public Improvement• and 80 Dedication between Paul P. McMichael and Cheryl A. McMichael and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improvements at 6709 Archibald Avenue. RCSOLUTIij,NO. 86 -116 86 as A RESOLUTION OF TLC CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION "ROM PAUL F. AND CHERYL A. MCMICHAEL AMD AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME P. Approval of Iatrntion to Form Landscape Maintenance 87 District No. 6, for the Caryu Planned Community, located between the extension of Banyan Avenue aed Highland Avenue and Righland Avenue on the north an* I curb and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the east and vest. Developers are the Marlborough Development Corporation and Kaufman and Broad Development Group. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -117 88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6. (CARYN PLANNED COMMONItt) PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 Q J�= City Council Meeting -5- May 7, 1986 s RESOLUTION NO. 86 -:18 39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL tS THd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENCIBEER'S REPORI FOR LANDSCAPE AND MAINTENAN..tS DISTRICT NO. 6 (CART$ PLANNED COMMUNITY) RESOLUTION NO. 86 -119 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T3E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DEC:.ARING ITS INTERTIOB TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAIRTCIIANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, (CARYM FLASHED COMMUNITY) PURSUANT TO TER LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 Q. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement 109 Security for Tract 131176 located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of fey College, submitted by T_y Paragon Homes, Incorpora[ Paitbful Performante, $615.000 Labor and Material Bond: $308,000 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -120 119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT 13117 R. Approval of Parcel Map 9530 located on the north aide 120 of Sixth Street, neat and vest of Rochester Avenue, submitted by N. Leith Wclker. RS90LOTIOt $0. 06 -121 122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9530 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9530) S. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement 123 Security for Tract 13066 located on the south side of 19th Street, east of Amethysts submitted by Rill Williams Development. Faithful Performance Bond: $306,000 Labor and Material land: $153,000 a City Council Meeting -6- May 7, 1986 RESOLUTION 110. 86 -122 132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IINPROVEMI7NT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13066 T. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 133 Security for Development Review 85 -24 located on the north side of Trademark, vest of Haven submitted by Rancho Cucamonga Business. Faithful Performance Bond: $11,000 Labor and Material Boadt $ 5,500 RESOLUTION 30. b6 -123 139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAF-0N0&.l CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPR07EMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 85 -24 U. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 140 Securi ^.y for Conditional Use Permit 85 -17, located on Base Line, east of Turner, submitted by For Rids Only, Ltd. Faithful Performance Bond: $18.000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 9,000 RESOLUTIOU 80. 86 -124 146 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF 788 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOINGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00. 85 -17 V. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement 147 Security for Tract 10076 located on the south side of Banyan, between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues, submitted by Lightest Development and Contracting and summarily vacating a pottion of Banyan Street, east of Archibald Avenue sad vest of Alta Loma Channel. Faithful Performance Bond: $128,500 Labor and Material Boadt f 64,250 City Council Meeting -7- May 7, 1986 RESOLUTION 00. 86 -125 157 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 10076 RESOLUTIOY 90. 86 -126 158 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF BANYAN STREET. EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND WEST OF ALTA LOMA CHANNEL W. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 161 Security for Development Review 85 -34 on the northwest corner of Trento and 7tb Street, submitted by Kajiw Iaternetioaal, Incorporated. 3 Paithtul Parforev acs Bonds $21,000 Labor and Material Bond; $10,500 RESOLUTION $0. E6 -127 167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITI OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR D97ELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -04 E. Approval of contract documents for the residential '68 street rehabilitation, Phase I project avardrl to I.P.S. Services, Inc. on April 2, 1986 in the amount of $42,590.02 at various locations as follovas Oraage between Carualisn and Beryl: taarald, Sunstone, Moonstone, Sacramento, Opal, Vineyard, Zircon, Buckthorn and Career North of Orange; Kirkwood, Pepper, Onyx, Layton, Alder, Ruby, Laucite, Ironwood, and Klusman Bast of Hellman between Ease Liao and Palo Alto; and Church, Arroyo, Sacramento and San Diego between Carnelian and Vineyard North of S.P.R.R. Y. Approval of Contract (CO 85 -062) Change Order for 148 engineering sarv)ces by Willdan Associates for development of physical model of peak reduction facilities for the design of Day Creek improvement project for an additional amount of $100,000 to be paid from Day Creek (84 -1) fund (PO 03139)6 City Couocil Meeting -8- hay 7, 1986 Z. Approval of contract documents for the north side of 212 Foothill Boulevard from 440 feet to 660 feet vest of San Bernardino goad (China Alley) project awarded to DeArmond Conetcuction on April 2, 1986 by Council Action in the amount of $15,012.69. AA. Approval to award construction management, inspection, 237 and staking for the improvements of the north side of Foothill Boulevard (China Alley) to Neste. Bruden 6 Stone Incorporated of Corona, for the proposed amount of $4,154.00 plus 10% contingency for a total not to exceed $4,569.40. B0. Appi oval to advertise for bid proposals for Annual 251 Landscape Maintenance Contracts for Cityvide and Landscape Maintenance District Bo. 1, No. 2 ( victoria), No. 3, No. 4 (Terra vista), and No. 5. The annual Parkway Maintenance Contracts will expire as of June 30, 1985. In,-_WLtion, the City will &seven Ty responsibility for parkway maintenance of large portions of the William Lyon victoria Proj set ind Levis' Terra vista Project as of July 1, 1986. It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Engineer to seek public bid proposals for annual maintenance contracts for parkway maintenance of Citywide parkways and Landscape Maintenance Districts No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, and No. 5. CC. Approval of Lien Agreement between Paul F. McMichael 252 and Cheryl A. McMichael and the City of Honcho Cucamonga for street Frontage Improvemiuc■ at 9742 Lemon Avenue. RESOLUTION 00. 86 -128 261 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIFO AGREEMENT FROM PAUL F. MCMICHAEL AND CHERYL A. MCMICRAEL AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME DD. Approval to seek bids for the improvement of Lemon 262 Avenue from Arebibeld Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street. .G 4 City Council Meeting -9- May 7, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -129 263 -- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ThB CITY OF •NCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "Ih7ROVEHENT OF LEMON AND ARCHIBALD AVOUES ", RN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS EE. Approval to accept final construction P.S. 6 E. for 267 Archibald Avenue reconstruction, Lemon to Banyan and Master Plan Storm Drain Line 4 -B, and execute final Change Order P3 for the addition of alternate pipe systems and addition of curb@, gutters and sidewalks at various locations for a contract increase of $1,500 for a final contract total of $33,400 to be paid by Systems Development Funds (CO 85 -002). FF. Approval for authorization of application for 269 membership in the CA- wornis Municipal Insurance '=y Authority. PESOLUTION 110. 86 -130 < 270 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AGREEING TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE AUTHORITY AND PARTICIPATE IN ITS LIABILITY PROGRAM CG. Approval of recommended changes in the administration 272 of the general liability program. RESOLUTION 80. 66 -131' 273 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUSTING AND SETTING CLAIMS AND ACTIONS AGAINST THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN CITY EMPLOYEES TO COMPROMISE OR SETTLE CERTAIN CLAIMS AND ACTIONS AGAINST THE CITY 88. Approval to submit application for funding under the 275 Roberti - Z'Berg Program for development of picnicking facilities and refurbisbment of the restroom structure at BMI Park. City Council "acting -10- May 7, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -132 jL 279 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO NCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAORGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING THE APFLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS ORDER THE ROBERT: - 2'BERG URBAN OPTS SPACE PROGRAM FOR .9E BERYL PARR PICNIC AREA DEVELOPMENT AND }!ESTROOM BUILDING REFURBISHMENT PROTECT II. Approval to release certificate of deposit for a sales 281 trailer in the amount of $3.000 for Lot 54 (6512 Peridot) of Tract 9321. JJ. Approval of final agreements with ESRI for previously 290 authorised Geographic Informative System hardware and sof tvare. RE. Approval to publish and mail the Notice of Bond 325 Redemption for Sixth Street Industrial Park (82 -1) Assessment District to BonlWders. ys LL. Approval of Agreement for access and use of Son X27 Bernardino County's Assessor and Tax Collector's Computer Data. MM. Approval of amendment of Professional Sarvices 330 Agreement with Bank of America as Paying Agent for Assessment Districts. NN. Approval to publish and mail the Notice of Redemption 333 for the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District 84 -2 to Bondholders. 00. Approval of Resolution establishing service authority 335 for freeway emergencies. RESOLUTION 10. 86 -133 c 358 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EHERGESCIES PP. Approval of Intention to Form Street Light Maintenance 359 a District Bo. 5 for the Caryn Planned Community, located between the extension of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and soutb and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenucs on the east and vest. Being developed by the Marlborough Development Corporation and Kaufman and Broad Development Group, and setting public hearing for June 4, 1986. ■ City Council Meeting -11- May 7, 1986 RESOLUTIOi NO. 86 -134 367 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF IRS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORRIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING NA7Ii MANCS DISTRICT R0. 5, (vARyN PLANNED CONOUNITT) PURSUANI TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 RESOLUTION NO. IA -135 368 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINAEY APPROPAJ. OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR RTRERT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DtSTETCT H0. 5 (CARTE PLANNED COMMUNITY) RESOLCTICS 90. 86 -116 369 A EHSOLOIIOI OF TflR -CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITY �u OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING IIS INTFNTIO0 TO FORM SIREFT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT SO. 5, (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE Ann LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 A. COUPCM RDNTm BSR A. DISCUSSION OF ADJUSTMENT TO APARTMENT DEVELOPMENJ 371 STANPARDS TO BE CD°c1RTERr BITR —Dv`ri Ill i0e DEVELOPMENT STARDIRDR EDIRTJ, Continued from April M. 1986 meeting. NONE SUBMITTED J♦ �' I J' 1 ♦ r ♦ ♦ 1 ]I 1: 1 11: .1. ♦ � 1. MI I � A 1 la•A' I City Council Meetilg -12- May 7, 1986 ORDINANCE 80. 290•(first reading)( 420 AD ORDIM.r CH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMP90INC TITLE 5 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 5.12 ENTITLED "REGULATION OF ENTERTAINNFNT" B. ADDITION OP CHAPTER 8.18 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA 426 MUNICIPAL CODE CQICE[IIINQ COMMERCIAL AUD INDUSTRIAL REFUSE COLLECTION — Establiabiog of performance standards and criteria for commercial and industrial refuse collection permit. ORDIDANCE 90. 291 (first reading) k 427 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 8.18 TO THE RANCHO CUCIMONGA YURICIPAL CODE CONCERNISG COMMERCM AND INDUSTRIAL REFUSE CbbrECTION may. BOULF!'ARD SPECIFIC PLAN AD HOC COMMITTEE. I Merck 3. 1906 CITY 07 48CN0 COCANOOCA city COO1cIL g190T0 •� Rfgules xeftie. A regular seetimg of the City Council of the City of 4acbe Commonest, pet an VNOesday. Muscle 7. 1996, to ties Liens Park Community teeter. 9161 lace Lim loud, laeteo Cacmaga. no meting vu called to "Sac at 709 p.m. by Meyer Joe D. M(k.te. ]tuft% ant. Coaeci lses6erse Pmle J. Vriabt, Charles J Ruiner II. Unhand M. Debt. Jeffrey Lies, ad Mayor Joe D. Mial. Also Prosser ruse CLLy Ilueger, Lauren M. Venartve; Deputy City Clock, Debra Adorn Cis Attorney, Jame 4rkmn; Assistant City Meutir. Robert R).ao; Community D.ralopsemt Dirertor. Jack Lame City ]lamer. Bud Ballaq City Patients, Lloyd Babbs; Community Service$ Llteeter, Rill Noting rod Adainietratio Services Director, Jim more. o eeaea a.. A. 7hartdoy. North 6. 1986 - 7,00 p.m. - 113:021C PROWAT10N COMMISSION - Lima. Part Co'!�pitty caaur. 9161 Rue Limo bad. 1. Yedne.d y. Meroh 12. 1996 - 7100 p.m. - "11W CGM19S301 - Liens Park Community Gatos, Bid) Pam Lt.. Bond. (Shia m.ti74 bu bum cancelled.) C. Th.atdey. N ..b 20. 1978 - 700 p.m. - ctlT COUNCIL - Lt..s Park Community Gates, 9161 Ross Lim Road. (Thera rill to -e metiq o0 March 19. 1906.) D. Shan day. March 20. 1986 - 7,30 p.m. - 7A21 DC9ILUMINT COMMISSION - Lt... past C..mmity Cantor, 916t Mao Lis. Small. R. !hared*,-, 4rcb 11. 1906 - 700 p.m. - ADVISOR COMMRSTOR - floor Park Comelity Center. 9161 late Line load. T. Prmmtotiae of . Prmle.tion tamseatim Arbor Day, IBM C. hocmatloa of . Paectamatiaa to the Spatial, Trails Jirl Scoot Council rrpelad.tog Match 30 - i6. 1966 as 'Girl Ptset weak* 9. Mayor Mlhals taoomctd that the Loral Agency Pneumatics Comala Roo contain. de sepses6.tat /• I of its City's that are selected by the City select Committee. Red tie maned 1s am open for .abaLalno of roamn and letters of interest to the L..rk of th..mtd an behalf of the City talece Committee. If ugase la Lot .rared fro at Coatll is aply.ag tar the, position, yse leas, until Merck 26 to submit your applications, which is • letter of letuot " mooset and a sateenst of year platform approach position of LOCO anpranttetivaa representing the Cities. assess Mr. Wasserman stated that Ito 3V ms an added Iran. 31 vc to be Reserved, and 3L if to be discussed. A. Approval o2 Warrants. Register 1.'a. 3 -5-86 red Peyrell 6341.4 2 -30-M for the total ••seat of $1,I64p21.20. 1. Ocobelie Beverage application ge. U 86 -02 Coe Oe-4Ie leer A Vies Ratlst Place License, The CO, Deald. Carolyn. Michael sod 4thV Norse, dill footklll lolimaad. J City Cecicil Wlauter North S. 1963 Page 2 ^.. Alcabolfp ieverage Applicstios No, AS 60.02 for Off -Saie pear A vise Cat(66 ?Lace -.icgq. 741aw42 Food Store (2135-33714). Southland Cotporatlea. 6001 Arcbibald Swats,. D. Approval to focrttd Claim (CLS6 -12) against tat City by JetNette Jobcaw fur automobile dagde as Seven Avenue. I black Worth of Foet6(11 Doclara.d to insurance carrier. t. Apptw.l of ccb.rrt gremot (COAL -W with Jobs Francis fov (.Sol rawlcea to 4.taltipt s sea- prafft foundation for the CLtyoa cultural tooter sad other coesmosity eshascegnt pwrpoue. f. Approval of tadewgntal 4aaergat mood Coastal plot Agndgat 06.O1k - Stvble.. (ItA removed faces ASsad4) RESOLOTION 00. 66-46 A RMOLOTIW ar IR CITY CWACIL a INS CITT a WCSO MWMA. CALIFORNIA. ATROPINE CDRAL RAN AMENDMENT 80. 86-01A - SURDS UQG0TD2 AR ANODNRT IC IR WD OSR 6I.IRDI OF 711 WORD COCN010A CIRDA1. PLY' POOR LOW DS617f IODESTIIL (2-4 MAIL TO 1W gWION DCvdIW ASSD0TIAL (4 -0 WIAC) 701 13J ACRE OF WD LoCATD W 7RNW BOCLAND WT Of WILL= AT001 - A7A 209-0!5-03. 07. 6 16 C. Apprvwa'VVvvacd Turner Avenue Ieprwegat Project Contract to 4ne7y- Cotpervt(ss. Wert. respaglble bidder for bid Intent of 6172.676.72. A. Approval to award North Two Repe IT Igrwmat Ceatract to Tat Toth 6 ton.. lowest. responsible bidder for bid ..at of 6152.622.41. I. apprwai to accept isp.wemosra It Bane ties and Be.... (Tratt so. WIG .00n.retive ASreemoat with LOOP Dw.10p st). sothotiw final "These and t City Coiinsw to file a Node, of Coepleti.a end release petforgace O (1420.000.00) and rateptics i10.S74.81) sad accept Watecaoce Road 1.000.00). WOLUTIW No. Q—S A MOLUTIOd W in CITY COUNCIL Or IR CtW of WCNO WCAN0C4. CALIFORNIA. ACCRSDC Ill PUBLIC 111FlOICKI TR FOR VMS LOS AND m1206A (T1LLT 11730 COOPRA?rVz Wlgn=T WITR LWT DRILDINYT) no DIFRt2RN0 Ill /DING or A NOIICS of C0 FLA710 FOR Tel voR J Approval to accept Apfrals.l Lapext to eaticat. the fair carnet pried Of the prowrty end the parties which 1• proposed to be acq.ised for rfSht- af-wap is cerJoactlns with lwthan Pacific tailro'A Creeeisp dne.fng as Archibald Aracae north of $a.e Line ded. In epp17Lag to the federal Coverwesast far funding of the proposed •treat .ed railroad crassiag NSdealag. the Citl is rpoired to formoily raise. sPprwe. W accept said epwa[aai report. 1001.0714 g0. 66-49 A k0CLUTIW W INS CIS! CCOSCIL OT In C37r Ol WCD WCANWGA. CALt70131A. APP11WEING ND ACC07I31G TOO APPRAISAL REPORT Of TR R0MID IIC17-0fiA2 At= INS TNT SDg of ACCSDALD ATOOi NOM W IRS SWTEW PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION CD"AST ■AILLOOD L Appawal of 14Pa. 197twauat Alnrnto. and f+teregat lo."Ltio. far Trnct Set, 12642. 13915. 26. 17. SS, 29, 40. 41. 42 end 42 located 1. the Cape Planned Commonalty sobdttW by Luftse and Sro S at Seetb. Califwni• aed NarDereugh Deraloprat Corporation. ,r Cie. oneself ML•ettt Marto ). 1186 lets ) ISSMMCM 00. SS-50 A 133 LOT1RN of TIES CITY CWNCO, or tic CITT or IANCNO COCtI[D• A. CALIFORNIA. An10YIC IM MDMT C{SIXOn. TAROSDIRNT 87002I7IRN AND FINAL SAID OF TRACT 105. 17642. 12937, )6. 17. L, D, 40. 41. 42 ASO 47 L. Approval of Treat Vat. Impersonate eteswn and Iprtrasan Security for Trost No. 11UI (D.a. 5)-17) located at the •utbeas[ so.." of Are. Into aed Vinyard Arturo attained by Robertson Sawa. • divider of C.tvil Cerpurnio•. (Ita, plied fn discussion) SISCLOTIA A0. 86 -71 A SUMMON OF 115 CITY CORNCIL W TIES CITY W WCNO COCAMl10A. CALIFORNIA. Atn0/3NO IMn33D=r CSSDMT. IMnOfRNRNT StCO11TS AAD MAL NAY W TRACT 50. 1]1)1 e. Aptrml of Tprevwtt Adros•s•e aed Iprovemen Security for Tract So. 12331 -I (Vitt. Grove Arsenal oal7) located at the east tide of asswas Avenge at the Ant► City Liaftt submitted by First Yoderel Iestsie sad Less Association of Va• Csbrisl Telly W ..losing the Ipsavw.t Sorewet Ned Iprnewn Security eOdtted by Dick Scott. roe. for Tract to, 12337 -1 (Vista Cntr, Avenue "IS). MIMICS ■0. 56 -51 �f ♦ . A, CALIFORNIA. M Alt CITT CCOSe11 CT TIT CITY 33 T SA0 LOCL133Cl, F RYn33Ol0 .11337x1A CaCOOT Tag Ittn33Of /T ACCOUIt AN TkACf 30. 11777.1 YD ICAAAIC ON "COST 97. CItD ®T AND IV101GCnT ACWllty unam a AOCOFt lJ. 1183 N. Ar)ttral of .opetrewet Atrew•t sad I•prevwat Security for Frier Se. 11793 located o the east std* of Awtyst Susu.. bnote, 93sblaad and Lease hews submitted y 7 amilald Sow, - Alta I.. • joint vsutees. ■ISOLUTlON 50. l6 -:5 A IRN011101 W TRN Clrr COUNCIL or TRN CITY 01 7ANCS0 COCAIOCA. CeL1F0RNL. dmarna DAn33OmT CarOmT. RN omi 5711.11 M To& x93 W TRACT 20. 11793 0. Approval of rptnwat Adeswst red Isprtrwat porosity for Tract So. 11932 located on the worth ride of Tisch. loner, Vaudois and tnea submitted by C.Tta. Inotprated. 21SOLMON 20. 56 -74 A I1SCIST1131 W In CITY COONCIL W IRS CIIT W RAtCRN COCMKA. CALIFORNIA. AFFSOVINO IxnONOtoT AG1aOlDT. Illn3310111 ptll.TF UP ►SAL MAY W TRACT 60. 11932 7, tslene of Foods and Satre* at Completion, Faithful Ferfurw*ea IW (taadaeap a street Little) 715,000.00 rSLALKL .e 31d SURE eI %SU _ .ee A-.t:ot sales..", Connotes Iced 7 91693.00 Q. Approval 02 Professional Service, 4ruwat (COM-OF) with CIA LoSleatrlaR Con.ltnoea fn slary sualin am bnear ruin String of unless respotlal .treats TV 8-04. nacre II. 3 City Cm.ctl siesta, lfarcb 1. 1906 Page A 0. Approvul at Icon Vista �astolde- Park Conceptual Dovulapmat plan. S. Approvul of Panel Clap 9757 located on the •mtl side at Ninblad area... east of Oren Area" subadttaA by SiS►laad -bvaa Associate,. RSSOLMON 00. 36 -11 A 1177=02 07 IR CUT COUNCIL Of Tit CIrT Dr WCRO COf JMN.tA. CALITORSIA, APIROrIRC PARCC. Up 0707 (TCISATIIR PAICIL NAP 9707) I. Approval of the nerd of cyleasriap contract for coattr"ttee Sessions to Patki" -feu ;a the amount of 019.100.006 far the ffrmsa park Dcr&lepment Project 0. Set public bearing for W d me rch 10. 1106 - Caelt7 D"ol.pet block Crest (CM) PrslWalry {tats"rat of CamsttT Objections, I, Approval of public bsariag as Oro 206 1236, for fwlroarstal Assessment. Negative Declaration act Not!" of Dateralutiot for Annexation 03 -1. Ceme.aitl Fact liti.0 DAt tic t 36-1 Cbay Crook Deal ..I a Sys t es) , CItmo Added) NOTION, bead by Debt. 9"064.4 by Iles to approve Coasut Wooden. btias carried uuim,ly 54 -0. Dl•....f...t tt, Approval of TToct LL,p. Ioprovameea Agraeust •" Lprweuet Security far Iced go. 13UI MR, 51-17) located at the northwest carom of Arras Shuts ad Vineyard Ave." submitted by Roberts" bon* a division of Cavell Corpersttea. Staff report by Mold bees. City Register. brd7 Strue W. representing Robsrtew Remo, addressed the Council, b stated Chet me ens of the percale be has base successful to obtalatlg the Cleat Dead; site the other parent as Arras lame6 be was a couple of days nay from c"en.mclog that yrecmeat. If the up sea approved .ed 1,." by the City Regions, toeights it could ma bin about three weds is getting his Project start". Stlliaa 4.7yke. eepreuetiag Count. Tarring she Is wart of wtparcal as Areas Rastao address" the Comcil. b grad with Mr. ITT "far that definite Petereaa bad bar Wa. Is bad ao objection to the project being 'PIT"" with t ►s ceeditiaa of the mp not being recorded until ouch ties as satisfactory &Suggest with Mrs. foreign bad be" rosebud, Chuoctlue Rudast stated be felt w.co"outsbl• with this activation. Cwactluo sag said be fait the teltial ties liultaties that bad boon established as basically bureau the developer felt be was wader a time crunch. The time tWt use eat is o"ar to either cordage ar not Ta "sme. AT felt with the groameat that hod beau resodo there spprrastly sea no time ,rabies, as tbwsbt the Cwu/t sbocld go &bob mod &pprova the 4joluies. Ms7ar Nikul• gated west would help.% if Choy spirws the laptwam.t Agraamat and the Treat Kip and hue ap[eaaa%t 1. reach" beta." the parties. Shat would that leave Arras locking like, what would it du to the honest Covncitu& Dahl felt that it the IT"t Map was approved subject to the City lagiaur retatatsg that the Grant Deed be received by the City as t&ditated by Cseecil, be didn't teal tby would lets geytbleg. All they woud be dates to sel"itieg the project for the appliceat. Council.. SaVCat felt there should be Loge kind of deadline put on it to it could be brought back in sad the, there would be mewe control go it and Council would know Hate it ono at. I/ City Conceit minutes Match y. 1986 tads f Mr. VenDyk* star" that Me'. 7arrlvo bee as desire to elw dust Bob,,;... sew, wed the completion of their project. 4 felt Council sbould spprov* It with the eoditiov as stated abuse, that there would be au significant risk to dtber Moo. Serri,e or the City. Re stated that this movie help Robertson. MOTION, Moved by $squat. tetedd by Wight that .dreew•t be approved as recommended by staff Covtiessct ups• asloome t bsa+san the partial by out Cou•cll wwied as Batch 10. Ms. moons carried wnsmlsesoly 0 -0 -0. ..see• A. nuarmYrlilt V v Itfa O t i s -01 sec Wl. t .. vme r r .y - n request to owed the plasm" Ccroslty tart for the Victoria !lava" Coam•lty to allow corrclal n tnm* sod Wi- s•rOw" Is the media. ltdb CHI) Residential District, staff assert bliss by truce Cook, 4aaci.te tla•wr. Mayor Met, spread the w*ties for poetic heavies. addre.sleg Cowcit aunt Jim Bailey, la ,bats* of the Victoria project for William yes Company, Ba Boom bid support of the Be storms project. Z. said be place to call it the Victoria he $ratio.. Council.: 31"t brw$bt op the fact that the !pt time it p. discussed tbea(y bad bass • ptatlas with adjacent property mast. Mc. Bailey stated be bad talked with the lady Is goestio.. The problem was met euelred, but be .a, Basking with her an it. Cusscllmev Debt stated the primary cues. for parties the status facility to this Iwatlos age tint of all It met a god location, and .acceded of all be It ess to same holm the people of Victoria. M enumerated how there ass esteems is the Ordi,aace am to who would her first Nance to state that% n's is this facility. Ba felt the Victoria people should be gives first olportsvlty. ft. Boll" stated that altbcogb it would be op.v to the public. it assist be .aitoble to the Victoria people first. Coeseklmas Debt sold be would ILLe to see some kid of au agreement with the City that tires Victoria firer tights vithtm the facility, *d It more specs was seed" they could kick .omeps wt of the facility. Mr. Bail" stated that It the@ sits Noma tee falls they hd sets food when an eddltioaal stores* facility could be spaced up. mayor M(kelm False" eat test what they are proposing to do to only rgei,emest at the plea, ad that is all they are 40164. Bob creb Brans. ff.. Victoria advisory Committees stated that although; this facility Would be available, there .cold .till be the cods select ...t Problem of "kits the ram mats park their ly'. In the army* facility. $be annealed that IT Oscar,, be made available at the aide d each raaldern. Cus•c1IOND eagsst't call resonant was the fact that all of the project@ is the City be consistent. Cusnellrn Debt asked shat could Council do to promise • batter code enforcement procedure miss refuse.* to the IT scalamt Councilwoman Walt ►t sold che agreed with the Idea of the storage facility. Ile felt that D.botN $awn bad a god idea of providing V space oD each site in the future. S City Council Minutes earth 5. 1956 paged Nger Xikele felt that .an • ea.Ole rely different issue, that the rhoald. a617 be our stand dU .hat bee hen proto4d to Mama the O cite tonight. Deputy City Clack Una$ red the title of Or41..Ar. No. 717 ORDI/UC9 10. 717 U ORDIIUCt Op IO Cln COUNCIL ON In CITT Or WOO 00CAHWA. CALItOINU, ADOPT= T1Cl0R3A pis gM COMI nlTf AXOLXtT O -01. TO "wiry In coM1DSITT RAs I= To ULON A 11ROnOAL Tlaai SMLOg LOT SIN Xnt-V00007T IN IO 1®IUM -alch wo 01 NSN (U L&ND Cgs CATCONT Up TO ALLON In opgYnv U A CWWRICIAL WON SOT lull C100 M IO DtCRAL PUBLIC XOTIC S Nevd by Ring. $needed by Squat to oiva fall radial of aNlvanc.. Kati., .$art" a ... ivoanly 5 4-0. MOTION- Mae" by Debt. $nndN Ries to adopt Ordl sauce pea .q. Notice eactld 5-0 -0. •f a... 1�.��Anlsm�us�.}.�2�,1 ANeQInDe VD tIQD t 1 �dRL$LmC..JJL..LILi. tnD Tr[ t a D 1 DLL} � � Arw".t. to nOgR. at�rQiaUner7 alive to the or.eni..a.0 entLt.ed Avenue 4a 1lplatl Auesl.�t0.. ._T!' lnrbsusuc and 03. 07..08. (.�a! nth. anot .41 ..at - An 775-141 -0/. U -19; through 275 -idol tbroelb O7. 07, Ot, 10 -U. theor opnd the -.eUng for public beaLiti Than halts -o eupue. public b the pJtle hurled ve closed. aputy City Clerk "am read the title of Ordinance go. 711. OtUARCS 90. in Y OOICUCL or to city COUNCIL Ol In Cln Of WCRO C7tlX2CA, CLL77001A, APPROVING U AXMDMOS TO IO MAVAn0 UD mtLO}MOT CLnMT1 llnit Tel CITY or UlCAO co U A AND TU CUM DnaOTXOT Ca"My. LUrX1R AND llOU WD Co"My UD XAQJDLOOCN DUILO?MT COVOUTION OLnpi 11 nolnn0 LOCULD arrant In 13TtsIO Cy '"TO UNION AND sICRUD ATtOS as TO poly, AID 90011. AND annul IO OT1111101 a ROC69TO AND XMIJIM ATtDO M In NUT Up NOT - An 2J- 141 -01. 17 -19; 715.131 -01 TOOUCS 07. 07. 0/. 10-17 HOKIN, War N y Nrigbt. $n.-dd by Debt to Orin fall reading of ordlouce t Mo. 711 ea12 ..raid ananieeaely 5-0 -0. r NOTIOR. Naval by §"-att eneedd by Ling to adopt ordinance le. 719. Notice Carried vutieay.ly 5-0 -0. �1 s C. Me- Nunn'.. City X4-1911 lace brief ductijLlee of Ordinance Be. 717. fi ay NO" like',.adq ee lnd� for public he4ri.9a There bel.g -o reap,,. ran Deputy City Clerk Ads= to" the title of Ord/44c.e lo. 71a d t a, e ti City Coca cil Mlauese Karat, 1, 1906 Pat. 7 01DOUCN 10. 215 U DmOUCN 01 in CITY CODICIL Of In CITE a NUCIO CMCLMMA. C innIA, hceonta CUTM tSLraI a CBUTz2 1.04 Of TO IUC10 COCLKOCA MUNICIPAL CODS 1217A2NO0 TO 500DIO5 LICOIO MMON, Moved by g/ec. tecoNN by M/kals to robe fall studied at Ordleaoce So. 211. Notice carried ..c.L.sly 1 -0-0. MMMs Moved by Dahl, *wooded by Set.st to No/t Ordinance No. 215. Motive carried 1-0 -0. ffffff 0. OYCtl m A. aavinvo L t0 TsLL 17. 5arla(oea /Noah , tarding 17.02.0709. 09. bwal ,0200 ac tails., t(Co.ti t7.Ob.O1V and 17.06.0700 retarding n..lI" led uddlt/eu. (COOtieuN flee S/0/00 ma[lug) Staff repast .part Lives by Nanecu Lbw kp Nay Teed, Covailma Debt opened the cantles for public battles. Tha* b.log ea coupon,*. the public hearing vu closed. Deputy City Clark Adam rood title of Ordinance Noe 254, 0XDOAICI 20. 204 $y U OIDWASCN Of In ClTT COUNCIL a TIN CITY OF RANCID COCAMICL. CALI70111IA. APPlaOO DIT6almT 0001 AM000OT 19-01. AMODUO 11714 17. ANINIMSIM2PICATIaS OTCTI00 17.070.0705 AND NO AYFLICATIaN IOLLaOO DOIAL Of StCrI00t 17.060.0100 AND 17.060.0206. a T15 MUNICIPAL COOL 107100[ Moved by Mole, opeaaed by Vr Cght to Vale* fell trading at Ordi ... cc to. 184. Madan catrled woco(as.ely 1 -0-0. C ... aliens, T/ec said be did act feel the present get., Vat bdog A..ed In say fa.bics end did ant tae ey toed to swig* its especially Iodine 17.010.070C. Covneilma Dahl stated h* totally *grced sit► Coeacllmn Tla&, Mgor Mikela odd be *Stood Vltb CeuncllmWees tied aN Dahl. Mr, sulfur etplaiew to Cassell what /vct/es 17.020.0700 most with records to a developer caring back to the COWN.103. N07I001 "ad by tatmt, seconded by M11a19 to approve Ordinance to. 361 lcr distension Parpeeae 6.11. Councils.. tquet agreed with the OTdlceac* because it woald allw cocoa to car back ritb aadllin Hoes. Mayor Mikels stated If this Nation ehoeld tall. it calls alga be bruttbt back .bee there is a ptableaa Its. Lae advised Council that the Cocoa. this ►ea been broagbt net to Sources tear. Savo been problem in the pest rtiardleg Hle. Cometlroma Wright brought up the tact that she vat not awn there ens a let .` of problem - only 1. i, Ih. *obis .tatty that if you one to to back aeveeal yceu. you would llad thus* hod heat *ter tests peaainiug to thin. Y: c Y,. '�e 7 _ City C" mail Mantas IWO S. 1916 pats t Ca silts ties transit op the fact that tattles 17.070.0700 tellutu th a vq appllut(ao fat a revision or eedlfic.ti,e shell be accept" for fiHag r�th /v au year free the data of map gproral. Pa stated there bas boa. tied, has project sets total a" it la discounted there are prablaed, at rhicb tied they need to coed back sad disc.., than. Be felt this ordinance prohibits it, a" that we eb"ldo*t do ttat. Coorcil o Rrighe said the word wsctstaecew vac the toy is section 17.010.070C. that amid lam the disc,.[(.. to our staff a.d .*.Joel.. to ideltif/ Nether or act the e.b,t*xa of Lb* /esan was different " to they coming back met cad "or tests. the felt Council seed" to rely .n the staff end cuattscime to ideality pose issue& that arm the sems "or and met Main. Meyer Mikel• said this ordinance would force as appeal, and they really didn't watt that. ►Ot1R MOT101t moved by lasusts seconded by Mikels to adapt Ordinance R,. 7N (far disc aoeton po.potea only)• Ratio. failed 1 -0-0 (Mlkals. 0.11 and Niel voted ao). aaaaa• Be AMSC11edT - hepo." amendments to Chapter 16,31 of the ecache Caramels Masleipl Coto pertaining to the dedication at part ,ad Rm... ,. I..& sa • c„dltta, of .ubdivAlau. (Castle." ire% Deresbe, 11. 1993 edetlng - Park Dmlapment Ccemis• e ."vast, be cautioned to April 1. 1986 vaetleg to ardor iou Coemioelaa7,a cautious fiv/niog Ordinance.) Royst Hibels opened eye marine for public bedtime• there holds to res9ossat the public bootleg was centimes to April 2. 1986 ATTICS, Mae" by Dahl. tiro "ad by lids to cautious Item to April t. 1986. Medan curried uc.L.,17 9-0-0. •seas• T. RTIRD.MDITIL Aal Rastas[ RD rstO&nt,L Alas aptftnr_nor M tAtN,l 1t -09 - Cen m wrm MCAXMU - AS An"edet to the Industrial Area specific Ilan Ln add tuurcb and Dml.ped.t /Otfic. au to the tea. A..... Ovstls, District. (COetisa" teen lsanap 19. 1986 edetlng) Staff latest Amen b) Sat Tong. "..let. plaeser. Meyer Mlksi• Op*ued the rating for public hearing. Addressing Council ..,at Dan Richness 9)7) lase time lead repeated his politics to Council if= the preiou& lasting that be was Msiast this became he aces s* rescue for this to blppds, Is felt time vat as ab.asses of laud sad brdldiats present and farm.. for quality l A D cities use is the City at Rancho Cuc.edngs. So didn't fool the coastal .cep* of l A D rff/a is compatible ve with quality office develo,dame, 4 felt that y allwlag this sae within avr code we mold sae request, tars sad • gr✓ual "*ding of eye Ranch, .ta arde. Be stated that ,ch, Cucamonga attTant. quality office m.• rmLdmt.. It felt .r.gote bmld .&,*who, .bat the Acres Oveley Dimtrict was ea..t to be, Tin Beadle, 9610 h.la s. Centel Drlye sold he aodet Mead part to be two It's, of l A 0 - L A D lcaafaetariss aed l A 0 Office, as said his .admt, "leg was that t A D Monafcctvries was more Iatemse into the can.factvrlas oru, Obnau it a 0 ciflce would allow seed research within edr. of an title* bdldiat. Mt felt the Am" Rea rsc an office type pr eject design, but has the type of too character that provida far the transition m.ey is" ,two$* or distribution. Cemncilmds Select asked Nede leedle the nsaan he felt it A 0 shumid be lacladed within the Aside Overlay Corridor other then possibly r.nscestivg interests that bsfy.e to fell within the &**graphic boundaries of that Carrldnt J City Cc ... 11 MlAOtaa earth 3. 1986 he• 9 Mr, Bowie felt that 8 & D office vat s farther corrosion of e 6 D itself. 4.� did got as it as • radical departure Iron the cbsrts[•r er uses that ate allowed within the werlty district. pb.t he Joel to • ferth•r definition. Ivory 41br felt s & D people are highly paid. tbay are rbysiciats ad bictnglctr. Be felt there be$ has ties, wban too waey codittwo bar• boom pat On a dw tout within the City and that Basehe CUcemnga bas last good [mats bmese of this, iin Borrow, "09 Utica draws stated the av,rlay was created to tab .ace gave$ henna tar it to be C•eaw%4 • "Jo? Boulevard from the watb .ad for It is be designed for the highest and best am. U fait at this paint the., the district rods, this is what we cow have. U felt &.search and 0avalapowst raesird arms&,. hipping sad receiving, which as not what the Corridor won Attended to be. [endless Dahl sntd be woo 10 ngraaeser with the Barrow, tap It was difficult to roes up with the diffsmtw beware l & 0 office ad l & D Nauiaetsring. Be said he Is having sane problem with the l 6 0 Office an along the seven Arcane Corridor, but does feel share are ,car type, of l & D Office Uses that .gold fit I. aloe, the Inside.. Be felt ne,ba • case- bytase basis would be the beat way to go as ear as determining what would be appropriate for Urge Avows. Cowcilesa Iaq"t rationed but in War of the B & 0 facilities be bad ease had the railrad • dlrretil adjacent to the properties and could be Jost es T disruptive, if Vow&* so tots what the,* would be in as office ass. said be qt ban nucleon re..n.tioas and camnq that ritb the scam of planning, slow and effort that be, Bowe Into the grow Avenue Corridor to wake it a well -plamw area on that property, be dids't feel a Compromise should be cod, n that planning effort. 4 felt that .e, ties a COY was plat" as any ate$, it would be a &*ricks breath of the planing power.. U felt the integrity of the du:&, work that is Being to be established is this .re$ should be walatstnd Cok.ellma Debt said what be is hostile is no are lowering to. standard, by allwing 8 A D office development along the Raven Avenue Corridor. U did,'[ feel the, were lowering the stadard, by doing this. 4 felt thm are ,w proble" Hang the Corridor Area. Be mentioned that fast foods veto .11wd sad but it Could that be own attracting than an l 6 D facility. Be felt it .bcwid be .der •cap sod leeked or on a coo• -by ays basis. Cwactlwae slag aemsrrd with Cwacilesw $%tact. Be said be has a hard ties defining what the t a D Uw m, No didn't feel it should Be included as a perdttd em. Cameitwww Wright does not feel that Raven Avenue should be c000romi,od an quality. Mayor Mikets asked Ore Bailer That ate the l & D parking r Wards were - l & D atndads or office etaw ardnt Mr. Sonar stated that s&* office aasdnds. Mayor Mikol..aid be didn't like the wad wrseeebliage. Be did not gad it ,aesgoa wan &*iva to build an office building which is nose for office cod bat 0 9-0 that la eonpatiNe6 be do•dc see what had begs coeyroulaw at all, Thu #false be seat as the am of the baitdiog as opposed to the oppoarme of the building. Constitute lsquot stated that Research .ad Da.eaowst is a different type of sod than office. At Aid not feel Research sad D".lopmot obaald be brought Late the Breen Aran, Corridor. Council.. egaar suggested that scneo&* clearly defies 4aserch a Dwretown[ user add until they cm, be sMegtd that Council newt the Urge Avant, Corridor Iron the 49nrcb a Gavalopeset use. N Clny Coaaell minutes Nut► 1, 1986 F.'* 30 CmacltwOoln vrlsbt ebtcd that the *le is Hat was botbarins here eat the build/ug. C...tllaea gins (.It it .boat* be left as is, DIPeny City Clark Adua read title of Otdlunne U. I49A. OID3RNC3 NON. 249A (first reading) AN GIDDRNCR Or Tit CtTT COOOCM Or Ili CITY at IMCg0 COCAMONCA. CALIy01o7L. AFTJONDC DIOBTRLL 1Ft0INIC nAp AMINDMO T 83-01 IN ADDING RESES4 -g AND DES¢m11INT /OfflCS Ott TO in RATE "Etas OTZIUT DIITMICT IT ANRNDINC ODDYCM R0. 149 NOTION[ Naval by Close aeceadtd by Debt to *live fall veedleg of Ordlaame Ma. I49A. Nodes carried ca.Amously 3-0-0. DOTflrt Mould by toptt. tteeaded by vrigbt to reacted valuer of first ardied ." that the inele./*a of &.Search A Dnetepmet as • use in the Caro hems Corridor vet be LLlmoda thus denying Ordiusme sae 249A.. Nagle. carried by the follovOS votes ATES. Wright. &.Coeq ties 1099, 1Nbel.. Debt ATRNT. ♦tense Tv C. t SLCT a _ staff repast by Mr. vamre.e. City M.noser. Mayer Mlbels ep.acd the wady for public bolting. There being nub rupouar. the Palo barrios *l. closed. Deputy city Club Yana go" the title of &.satuties tub. 86-36 RESmmal 10. 86-I6 A 113MOn01 ON 729 CITT COnM ON Tag CITY a MCIO COCAMORC1. CALIFORNIA. MtRINC Tat Win IN CCOafCtlf/ vin RNa ESATION 10. 17 TO LANDSCAri MADTRNANCR DISTUCT 10. 1 AND ACCAPTDO vet FINAL RNCDtn's &DORT Tot TACT 1a. 12010 -1 NOTION. Nm.d by 1n4vet. secluded by Wright to ..tv* fall realise of tarolottoe No, 06-16 Mattes carried susimasiy 1-0-0. NOTION. Tea" by Debi, emended by aright to .ppeme &.solo[(.. sub. 06-T1 Katie. carried cuLLmsely 3-0-0. unease a. oj2j= TIN ym m encattTins vi am. 11131. lxltx. .xNtl -x. ]t4W_I. nd. mall gin yll¢ M • 1ti1 110 a1 tlGamG wanysu0e eTenlez Ne. t gin ucar.nON ee ex Tm .r•.+ d 1xelx t: MI_S. 1 }a 90_1, nee. 11_11 110 yl�tYi. Mee 3111 Tea nm •.t0 Ya-r DISTRICT 20, x, tt.ff *pert by ft. vsesere.e. City Maness. Nper Mlbe1. apuned the neatly for public heari s. There being nn response. the public hearing va etas ". Deputy City Clerk Ad.m reed the title of &..star/.. ND.. M -37 .ed 86 -16. 11301,01101 90. 06-07 A RESOLUTION Cr -99 C17T CMCIL ON In CITY or RUCK* CCCA"CA. CY.VOESIN. oID9RINC Tt vaRN D CassiTlON vin A/1ESATION 10. 14 TO 9TTT LtCNMG NADTRNYC9 DTTRICT 10. I AND ACCTFTINC TT rIRAL INCI11011's RMIT In To= $06. 118". 11921. 12801 -1. 12630 -1. D.R. 9011 YO rAtCfL MAr 9319 All) 9104 /O City Council niautme Norcb 3. 1986 hga it RnmLOtloa 00. 86 -38 _ A 11301710/1 or in CITY CCOSCIL OF Tit CITY or WCNO IOCAMICA. CALIFO IA. VDIRM TEE Vogt D CW9Lnioe VITI ANnEArioR 10. It TO STRICT LICRDC nAlCU APCS DISTRICT 10. t 920 ACnPTDO TIC MAL >me INUX'1 EXPORT FOR TRACT 108. 12922. 12801-2. 12650-1. D.S. Wit 09 FARCM NAP 9318 IS -p, named by Sagunto tttoeded by Wright to waive tall reading of Resolution Ear. 86 -07 and 86-38. Notion carried vaaalaovely 3-0-0 NOTION, Named by Debt. .*cooled by Wright to approve Resolution Soa. 86 -37 mad 86 -08. Kati.. Carrie mcanimmusly 3 -0-0 I. Dnrltr. :Q Veme I. em[t -I Vt 1 . e }e of 17■ e leTtD. tx Y,l_T. ,x.tA. u9xT uO 22921 T9 r••m • ••E DISTRICT 1• Stdf repeat by 4. Veaearmee. City 4atgar. Nagar Ntkela spree the meeting for public b wing, ?base bolas am Campeau.. the polls hearing vea closed. Deputy Ctry Clerk Adam Clad the title of W.latioa 4. 86 -39. nsCLOriO to. 86 -39 3� A o.TT10S Or Tn nt< COOSCIL OP 2is CRT oP wfho COCANOSCA. CALIIO6 TA. ANDSCD0 nE TSA D DISTRICTA . I MO ACCU 90. t6 IV LANDSCAPE S UPOCE DnTl1R T 1 1 920 0,[10210, to -2. 1 EE. 12922 D 1113 roe TRACT Nm. l:oo, 10:10, cacao-:, u924 u922 uD nm Nand, Ore by Ellett. ..*"ad by ITisbt to waive tall readies of tesolutisc see 03-39. Ratio. e ... I" oetmisatly 34-0. NOTION, Named by Debt. seconded by Vrlgbt to epps"m Resolution So. 86 -39. nation tarried aea"meart7 1 -0-0. 3 Staff report by Cubic To. Asamel.t. ilmener. rigor nlielo 01446d the meeting for public basting. There holes no Volvo.... the vobllc hurts, vs. close. Deputy City Clark Adam Tae toe title of Resolotlea go. 8640. "SOMICN E0. 8640 A Rno.0TIOA 07 Tn CITT ConCCL Ol TO CTTT or wno COCAMICA• I MU IA. urgomworm TIMOR nom TIC 1992/66 ComOAStn DNCLOPNDS It= GMT ntCIAI NOTI®, N.red by Deng. seeoede by ties to wahe fall readReS nod appxw. 40etutin go. 8640. Motion carried eeanlmeaely `r0-0 v_n, tote[ smry Ica Cmuese Sr. Civil Inside". see ntmmu emte Staff report A.,44 by Peel 4epsu. never ni\ds opened the meatteS for public hearing. There beta,, a rogu, the public bearing was ciao". City Cworil Mle.ta. 14nh S, 1962 Tat* 12 Deputy C1,N Clock Ada. Told the tine of Ordl ... cc Is. 299. ORDLIMCI 80. 299 AM =11"c6 09 TIN CITT CoCACM Cr III C12T or 1ACIO COCAN A. CALMINIA. nCT10I 10.20.020 4 "I WCIO CDCLWWA C1R COI 1CAIDINC nIM FACTS InCD LIMITS OTON CRTAIN CITE 91UM MOTlat Mewed by latest, I.."" ht Mlteta to also fell Bedi.S of Ordi..... No. 299. Pieties started 3-0-0. Iaem readies set for 14tch 20. 1956. .. A. AIT[0u. b A Nab,pRb b TL II • ^b •'�^A t { 21I{.1MI1lO _p[}Oef[1Rbf d[e p[a[tafC_ tern} }p Tttp[ [Op[piv [bOt Sr[[� may, n• [bfpt }lay C • ,� ape [bp 1'pe T XMIM. Std[ sepses pm by Jack Low, Cececi[tty Dowalapesat Diseases, Mapnr NA119 8063 Mr, Los tow each the eniepe scald bet Ns, La stated it scold he sbeat $1,000,000, oT approximately 24.000 per NmMTtN d6peedist es the $is. of the property, sa stated the scbedsle of owats s0R1(►1 Ar Coutil to apRwa the Seeoluttae tosiibt. with the ties& dacuautstIjW- to be ►reatht beck ee Narch 20, which scold faclede the prrch:ddt- cestrset free the edersties. Oapury City C18k Aden real the title of 4selutl.. lo. 66-61 1330{,0110 50. 66.61 A AlS Lonow a In Cin C00CTL ON III City or W CNO COCAMMA. CALI10331A. PLAREM nILIN33AIT DITTIMINATIOS AMD DICLLLTMO MMT10 TO ISIOI 1110IDLC IbDS "I A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DII22ICT. YD ontalMC A CMIT 21020 NOT20t Mowed by Debt, ecoeded Ii.N to Asia* fall re.dlet s.4 approve Sesaludam so, M -61. Matiet cIrrild aasimously 5 -0 -0. AR101 Cwail agreed to cbmSe out 8etisS data to M.rr► 20, 1906. C. [rbr1T"JIM ie "MYTIN ILteib [!'.eD •^ npt[0 tR AM001 Coascil tat rstiot tee 6.00 pm a Nsac► 20, 1906. D. TtMdt BOb Nrro[.w, ACT101 Mr. Noun.. stated this let sboold at ►owe been lifted *"or City muster-5 Staff Is9atta, that it will be itemized a Is. T to the fa11wOS stud[.. Thus wale ee CaWaise ItrorB todSht. as ae•a /a=)- City C...ail siesta. Much I, Ism hp 13 A. Cd1i11TITtd w 1TIDrattC [iT [DDt[It aDkrOMMITT (M) w M fnuniw TO ANVISM dotard, Staff report Shea by nB etc lino, Ae 610000[ City Manager. M. nun stated that there tar$ we Lswap I beta[ the identity into. (caf(etq Sett$, perpestl, ad the ether Issue was the tlneactaa. Mayer ntala asked fu volwteen to soma os the $.brvmittass. ACTION "or Mik.le suggested that Caescilmrben lotuet and Dahl $err* as tb• caapafav fivaaclng issue subeouitta., and MayeT nkels ad Caeacilmn ling woe a. the purpose aabc..dtt.e. ♦.uses B. Omer IT eda[nwu M I= PAQP ng T tt COSMIC TIIfa1T. (ADDTD II[n CouOCilaea Dahl a.. .port start.& be bad rec.dved 1¢ferutioe fro. Bred Buller, Its tboulbts Of Nee Walker. be to ahead of County neat Covtrel, ats st•uwvt was tbat the district can rat Its responsibility as far a the County is cauare d. The ercafval idea vas that we tags • look at the anamaia of all Caeory Mead properties within or Barth"• Sphere, rbicb forlada all flood nevtaal pta "Itias. Since thus be bus discussed the lean. ritb man& ..""fears be assured hi. the loarJ of 1.1"Iml would .bo be in total " ..wet with this a asked C ... r❑ to request staff to w s •boa with the a -Wrlan "ecasd/ap and cast Swelvd In term of liability tbke'>k CBS City at accept, ad report bank to Council for future Sir "tics of the aenmtlaa. Xper Miketa asked if by liability Be want tee -left to iwasttgate the fleaneial d.plicafnes of the a¢aaa•t/ao? Courcllmo Dab: aid Ist Mayor Mtkals @toted that before this in done. that re r.rify the Sward in Soda& to to-pod f "arsbty before we de • lot of staff wart. Councils Dahl stated that this ra what be A Portia& era. Coutilmv larlt .ngS.Pt4d that .tall be directed to initiate the necessary freca"Loge to arm the roeaq properties within the phone of lativaan. Mayor nbta stated It eight take • long tin, to Bem what be if ... ciai inglicatio•$ are. Cvuacilma Sue.4t said ."t. w raw to de • entice of Isurt se they would know what our ley range as"ntiaas con•. Otto arwtlt, &r. 71 ..... .sit then were two Ovals to to after this& eas beta& to p"mcb tbl Board of fa "rwlaons, ¢ad the other v" to to initiate by Coaocil "ties a ylaolat Le of Intent which would start the action with LOCO. 4 stated the Ce t7 wouldn't really &at iwolvd in it otll the .d. 6 tat &clog tbtwp the Board of Sepe "Irons would be a Better ray of mpedlting it. Co@tcilwa leout[ Oak" Me. Markus if • weber If Council war. to apply far the LAICO position that was disc tad asrli" in the "sung. would that Council mabar be faawd is • conflict of let.... By Or, Xarkmv .rated vv. AC[IMI Staff to proceed with this, fled out the best ray to beadle tt ad report back to council, sae ee. /3 City Cusecil Minutes March 3, 1986 Pat. U C. 1LUUA rDn al a MT • eta. IDtm im. Malor Mikela stated that ..qae* bad received his latter of resignation to be effective at the conclusion at the meting, an aid it waa op et Cesaeil if tbq vantd to Oct teeltht led aPP.I.t bit sorcessor. Cavacilrs Debt stated to Oaks It clear that if aa7 of his fallen Covocilaaabers ere lnellned to place bA ear irate crdesation, b* vestd to saes Kate be " d to a feel the thieatlea. a tbetd be sea sot resting fee M.1. t. did ba !wal at this t(r wee be resell to some no rupesaibllRAe. Ma,.ar Mik.la ask" if there ware ootitatloes tar "Or? Cottelluors bright eotlnated Jeffrey ties. Sher. were so ether voWatlsaa. It wee voted 4 - " -1 (Intent abe4fed) tPpoisting Jeffrey tied as rafts. .. *a.. RMOS, M.ed by sikels to adjourn to areective aeesloe to rota...* no Marcb 10, 1986, for regular meting of City Council (Instead of Karen 19) *.ties carried ekilim all 3-0-0. Meaning edjmned at IWS p.a. T. Approved, . It. pacUttll tabatttd. Debra "am Deputy city Clerk April 16. 1906 CITY a BANCBO COCANaC.t CITY COUNCIL NMVTTS "IRAMALARRUMS An adjaeracd Heaied at the City Coteau of the City of amoeba Caw -ya wt am belatedly. April 14. 1916. is the It... Park Comments, Center. 9161 Bate Line Road. "echo Cecanaed.. 7ba warty a.. ..tied to order at 6,10 p.m. by amyo, Jeffrey [lei. present pr. Cooellsm-beees Joe D. Nlkal,. Charles J. Basalt It. Pa -I. J. Befits, mad Nazar Jeffrey Clan. Also protest pre[ City P-sed-r. Learss V. beunuat ",latest City Mutant. Robert Biel "a"lat "the Analyst, bark Lorirq Adalalotratbe Semite, of- V"tor. Am hull Classically D.r.lopmeat Director, Jack La.0 City SoBlaur, Lloyd O,bbl Causally Bemica, Director. Bill mlllyl Bandied official. Jerry Claotl Plan Check Caardleat". Jim Harriet and Sheriff's Captaln, Jobe faaabte. . a...e 12PI. ,. mDmraB m Ntmmc ?%y IDs PUPaea Of the -etled was to to met the City'- Calls. Aft., con elated- 'to- abet the Clreelltiaa Bioent of the Control Plan. Cantuil contacted that c .pedal ratty cbeeld be call" for BareNly, Mayor 11. (at tb* parpaaa of dimes" the Clty'• circaletiee el... t. (010040 ADNTl) an•CCn.vy HMOs meted by brIgbto stranded by Belaot to adiaum to /atnrday. Nay 11, at o plus to be anauc d. Nation allied lnanimonil, 4-0-1 (Doll ab .... I Th. --tied el) -r.04 at hSS p... �5 am.p.etf.117 90.1t'd, I really A. "theta City Clerk April 10, 2966 CITY Cy WCRO LOCAMONCA CITT CODSCIL NIe0Tf8 A easier rating of the City Ca ... it of the City of "a:ke Caumnga sae as Wedaasiq, April 16, 1986, in the LIoar Fee Comm,oity Cuter, 9161 hue Line 9o", go Cue amaaa. The rating n• allied to orAer at 7131 p.m. by Polar Pro Tae tllteed N. Debt. Resort were Comacileabare, Jae 0. Mikele. Charles J. 6s9set II, earls J. Wright, Jsd Mgar fro "m dl4erd M. Dahl. Also protest rare, City Proaar. Laorn N. Wusecual City Clot, snerly A. 6atbeletp City Attuao7. Jsmo Berkman; "@imnt City Masser, Robert Zino; City 7laeaer. Brad bullet; City Balloon. Lloyd btbe; Commaiy tactics, bitettm, 411 Bullet; Admlaletratiro Sonic*, Director. Jim "rtj and St. Us.pa, Otto trastll. Abuat Bayer Jeffrsy itn. AFPTatl el 4rstaar MOTION, Noted by Bib le, sec oiled by b9sat to apps *,e febnaq I9. 1966. Pabnaq 27. 1976, ton% 20. 1986, April 2. 1966 and April 7. 1986. Ports 1. 1906 Pilots. sera got appr"44. ..ills canted vunlranly .ib 4-0-1 (Jsj H au rise . I Dahl abatafaN from 2abnary 19, 1918 ala.T" Dallas. % a. about from Out rata. Wright sbanlaed from Arrll 2. led& elgataa ban aua Ha use A ... t from ch.% r.tin. 2A. rzer.day. ISM 17. 1906 - 7,20 p.m. - PARK D&TG.OYMOT C6 1161ON - Lfo.a Tart Cemsity Caner. 9161 Bare Lin* toad. 23. W4@eada7, April 22, 1986 - 7,00 p.m. - PLMYSIG COMMIS4ON - Liese talk Community Cantor. 9161 taro Line Read. 2C. Thaadq. 14111 28, 1986 - 7130 P.m. - AOTISO&T COMMLISIM - Limas Park Community Co.-u. 9161 Su• tine hard. 2D. Pcotottatioe at • ytot"mtlea dnlariag the ttisanda Sigh School Tall riag Use a City 4buaedon Cot Hs 1906 utef.mios i flag Tau Cogetltiaa in Takeo. Jaau. 2S. yaurot-tic- Of • Ta"laactLoa d"Alrin Not as tarter &pemb sad getting Month. 2f. Mc. Bus arms ra9ototed the ustiog 41joan to a closed @east" to Jlsn., p ooggal Isms. ...a♦a ]. rONm�r rJtrDeq Caarrllre Dahl requested It" & $. palled for discussion. Is. Appr "Q of Warrants. "&later Roi. 4-16 -86 tad Payroll otdtog A -0 -06 for the total ..at of $361.011.10. 16. Apptoul tJ arelne ad file canter Imottrat Sdedal• as of A -7 -06. 7C, Receive Claim (CL S6 -17) against roe City ty Clue P. ArcarL for automobile drum* a Canal( *,. ID. Berlin Claim (CL06 -14) against the City by Ruhbule Agricultural drnic* for set ombit, accident at the railroad crenl*g of Bell old and gasoline. /6 city Coucil tt 04b. .4-1116. ISM roe. 2 31. Aplwwe% N t.{abw--..r,c A4r..usot (CO 46-40) let parlay Cam froauSo towwa.,att oeett --t d by ft -"117 tad Aa,odlat .. tat., to ceajvut roe vicb 14rorwoW.c tbdr project at putt, $great tad fu--a Arne. (Cop $242). Feed- !e d. amaam of $49.60L62 to be dr.ea free the tiata oxdept.ot IoM )9, ayprwal of aodotlee of tb* d-etbeeNO fb.0 IF Ceatv." accustom, (CO WA) aad dittos the Adalai.trotivt F.r,leea D!rwtw to ,w aid. $169.116.00 ft" ADD f.rticipatiea sad eat Tot read. to lea project Colstrutiaa. 3C. Ap9twll of lrott,aloSal Ferric-- AOaar,ot (CO 86.42) wLCD Aatociefod ra$L,m, to $meld, Nan., owifs.tic., dom .q{nur', estimate for tad v14"ieg teed t,0ewtwt of RilecA. loom for as t.oaat .,t to awed $1I.VA.00 plea 101 ... tiae..q. 31. Appmw.l of ltprwa.,er agreao.ot W Ir,rw.wt FaaiCF f'.r Treat 10827, -2, aM qo loutad betw-us $et.ess Iod AwoN daaget, awtb of wli,oa, odalcted y talco I.d--cries. waLUria ■0. 46 -94 A "40=10. w Tom CITY COOlCO. or in CITY of WCr0 ODCAMKI. CALIFORNIA, AFfR0 =G I9flOJOfUt ACtreenT. 1171wO1YT 16411eITY too FOAL. KAT a TSACT roe 10827, -2. YD -3 31. ul,-.e of lord. .M Notice of Ceusl.91" (Street - t. 11914) (Strut - h. 170") (LoaMecs,a - h. 110 ") ( Stret - Tr. 17041) (Iaed,eq. - Teo 12043) ($treat - Tt 11046) a.7...v .rat.. rxrxv (Stmt - Tr. 11926) (Strut - Tr. 120 447 (Lood--ape � h 110") (street - W. 11045) (Laa.up. - FT. )1062) (street - Ft. 11046) $ 33.800.00 $370.000.00 $140,000.00 $ 64.700.00 7 20.000.00 $ 31 /00.00 l,adwt $318.000.00 $3.o.00 11,6C00,00o.w0.00 $541.000.60 t57,000.00 116773,000.00 RESOLUTION /0. Ft, -9) A FIBOLUTIO or TRZ Cirl COOFCIL m Ttr City p RANCID LSCUMA. CALOODL, ACCMWC Ill F01LIC IN"CreaOTF IOl T'1ACT NON. 11914, 120", 17042, 12046 AND AOTU8,11111C Tlt vlt Or A NOTicl a C6tI Lznw 708, In v= 7J, Approval of ].wwtaat Agreadaat tad lq.wtusat satart" for hate 17801. Iw.t,d oa the teath"Ot COW" of 4t7a mot proellu, --baloted by no Dew had Comps y. MOLMN $0. 81 -99 6 t82Ilolyllm of 307 CITY COUNCIL 0 Tai CIT7 a Rom or"OCA. CALA002A. AMMIN0 I11210FOtpT MuccYT. IQ0gO(YT larwal19, Mo FOAL W OF ?--= t0. ISNI 39 Ap"ft.1 of Igrw.mnt Crk.aa(ea A4mar,eat aM Iarwto,Ot Sorority for Treat 126711 Iodated dt tbn tmt6 aide of Arrar, muter, Kuroda a" lWr, @".tied by 82cbeod DoWletsat. City C .... il Ml.Wga April 16, 1926 Fng#3 RESOLUTION 00. X.97 e arsoLmom or Tat UT COUNCIL Or Tic Gin ON woo ' COCANCOCA, miromiA. VFIONINc IMROFELIT EXTENSION MICRNaT aD IM MENSIT OZWRITT FOR TEAM 10. 12621 2L. Approval of a Pipeline License (CO a6-61) be",,, tb tao[6•rn pacific Transportation Capat2 and the city is ceoaaccian With hart so. 12390, located seat of large Avenue. earth Of laas Lie, 20408 aed, aloe. the approval at an stcuvrat (CO 86-44) lads" Laurie urn d California, the developer and the C9 IF. RESOLUTION 20. 86 -98 A InOIATIOU C7 In on COUNCIL a In CITY or vela COCAMMA. CALIFORNIA. Arnaaa A PIPELINE LICal1 EMUS Tit Cllr AID TIN NOUTUM PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COOpuT Sol FIX I2RALLATION ON STORE DRAIN FACILITIES WITSIN Its RAILROAD IICR-CF -WT .M. Approval of adjustment to saslng"g Ao4 -wile cop•... ties sad establithret of delooa bestir coo asutits for ".clop safety surveillance " 1411.1 for Malst.nesca bwieu f"".1. 32. Appvwal of Accepts"• of Castellon Street 1•aetitiutiee Project as caplets And aut6eri4A the tiling of a ■ones of Completion to :he work, 7 lESOLMOS 20. 86 -99 Tyr A RESOLUTION of Ala CITT COUNCIL Or Tit CTTT Or woo CUCY A. CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING PER POILIC IIOROr Etas pot CARNELIa STESR 29"TITICATIO 11039" AID "71011211C no RLINC 0 A MOTICI 07 COM MON pot Ttt won 10. Approval of lap. f.""emat ASresret sad teprov.mat security for parcel MAP 6680. located an the seat aide of lase".. "t► of lea• Lie.. nldtid by M A s Residential oevalo7mset, tat. RESOLUTION to. 96 -100 A 113CIATIM Cr TIE CITY COUNCIL a In OTT► or "CIO OCLNML. CALIFORNIA. "MOVING PARCSL W 00. 8680. (TIMU?IT6 8ARCIM MAF 8600). Ittf moor arnaaT YD IMMINENT OtLORITY U. Aparwal of lap. Iprm•rst 4r•ae•nt anA Tm ov•ent security tot patter MAP 7902. located ea the east 614• of Mglsrry, south at Mean. selected by Jahn W Mara List. tES01.011201 00. 86-101 A IESOLOTION ar 012 CRT COUNCIL ON TIN CITY ON a" CIO OCAEONUA, CALIFORNIA. APPEOMO FARCE. IOU 7902 (TINTAT111 2A1CIL WF 7902). IglWEtaT ACESRNRNT. AID 1xnoV M86T S OIITT 1Q. Approval of Panel [lap 9117 locate utt of Viegatd Area... lode" Arrov &oats I" 9th Streets submitted by tvarAte" Mertpngs Cerporstiee, lESOLMEM 50. 86 -102 A &ESOLOTION OF Tit CITY COUNCIL Or FEE: C1TY or Rmoo CUCAEOCA. CALIFORNIA. &SPEODO FARM WP ■DIES 9137 (TRNTAMI puts MAP roll" 9337) ale Appewal of hatsasinal panic" 4raawst (C0 86-41) nth bases Consulting Cw%P tar FYdsed "al sewiaas calsting to sit, e"lsetloe, the pteperetias at • Iralidasly Ladscale not. ad she sefficspe eenatwetios d"VestOts tar the r "oaatnctiar of Vittoria Pact Leer. The eastr"t entrant to tar SISppU end cull be faded by the Victoria L gvmps ses•"m"t District. Led1tsP9 senseovst District 94. M City Council Minutes AprO t6. 1966 Page 6 )a. Approval of Prefualonal Urvieaa Agrae.eat (CO 86-4) with FORM for the PTap.s4(0. of laodecspa pbuins /priority plat. sad Itb Strut ova cUtiep construction plats fat Archibald Areas. beautification. The contract uncut A for 110.970 aad will be funded front 4a.tiflcatic. funds. 5T. Approval of Uprw.mat &st..alan Agreement and Improvement Setualty ft: Perot 17706. lxatad 00 On .eat aide of touter. homes. Art. last. aad 260 Stunt, amsitta by Deer Creek Fartaers. 9ESOLUTtON 50. 86 -107 A RESOLUTION ON TIE CITT COUNCIL 0 Pat CITT a WC10 CUCAMONGA. CALITOOlA. AFFECTING IRlW00T 111011a, ACRIRNRNT AND IMFEONRNRNT SECURITY 702 TRACT 117L9 50e Approval of Lt.. ALTewet bmass Richard 0. Smith mad IRchalle I. Smith and the City of Wcbe Coca..&. for street fseetagn l.mtwTrets at 6207 Archibald Ar ... a. RESOLUTION 10. 56 -104 A RESOLUTION Of 712 C1TI CODICIL N FEE CITY 07 WON WticONCA. CALIFORNIA. ACa77EN0 A LIES AGU MOT Ma RICIARD D. S1IFE YO OICLILLS L. gain AID 10710-II0C FEl MPOR AND CITY CLM TO 932 SAMS 7V. Approval of Line Agreement tad 4errat Good beme.n Gilbert Cobe.teu;pd Suit.,.'t011o. ad the City of Rancho Cuctwsgn for strut front." rmprovemsto at 6377 Archibald Avon". RESOLUTION NON. 96 -107 A 100LUION Ot IFE CITY COUNCIL a TAR CITY a WC20 CUCAMOCA. CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING A LIM ACREENSIT YD WRNtENT 010 NEW GILSRNT COULON AND SWARA MALLON YO AOFERSOO TIE "TOR LO DIET CLLR " SMI Tax fall% 52. Approval of Lies Agrtt"at between Alfred L. 419ae and the City of &such* Cocteau,& for street f.ansu. trprwtmeuta at 6245 Archibald A,**.*. RESOLUTION 10. 86-106 A 1ESOL07ION 0 TIE CITY COUNCIL a FEa CITY ON RANGED CUCAMONGA. aL00RNIA, ACCUSING A LIES AGREEMENT FEW ALPIO IW.ONt YD AUTIONIFINO TIC MTOX up CITY CLM TO 8RC1 7RN NAME 51. Approval of Public IWavemeat ad Dedication Agreement and U.omeat Deed Nan... &den a. Tea*% wed 4tby I. Tones &cad the City of Rauch* Cocawag• far Strut freatye i.prwa...er It 9727 Lew. Aruaa, RESOLUTION 10. 66 -107 A RUMMOS 0 M CITY CODICIL ON TU CITY ON WCRO CM—CI, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING A n1L1C IMOVEMOT Us DOICLTION AGREEMENT AND W tMRNT CIO PROM &=a 1. TOOK AND EATRY L. POKING AND ADTIORIZIN0 TIE NATO& AND CITY aT0 TO SIGN In MAR 51. Approval of AsIm.raemeet Atmeme.t (CO 66 -30) for Improvement of law" Arnie in coe)uttiea dH Peace No. 12 $37 located home" Vittorio Strut aad Vice Street. R. Approval to advertise for bid, for conttru*tica of traffic Signal, at the following Iweti*&at Arrow 4s[a ad 411" Avemmel Vtnpeed Avenue and 9tbt Into Lime bed ad Oryl 1tre,tt Art" Avenue &ed Church Stoat Lava, Arnhem od Lama Area,.. The cost of the it's traffic signals to eatimeted at $370.000 to be funded from C" TIE ad 91stem Owal,paat Vaea. �9 City C .... it mi.at*r April 16. Ip66 1". 3 IMOL.DTIa go. n -toe A` ZIMOTI0 of In Cllr cmc6 RN In fin OF WCDO COCUOUGA. CALIFORNIA. unaac PLUS UD SlacipicAnwS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AI BASS 171/InYL; 9RNITARN /IRNTI; AR"W /RIL.1mU; KATRN /CIOR"; UVWMA. RN UID C2y, UO URNOUIRNO UC DIIRC2uc FIR C.TI CLRNL IO UtRNTIS1 TO ICCItut sits IAA. Approval of tt.isltlo. at Video palpaet for Co. perpo,e of pena...l tretsis, and public presentation, in as asoat at to =card $1.1a . 333. Approval to raises. Certificate Of Deposit rKdel Roca) is to. scout of $2300 for Lot 36 of Treat 12384 (6790 ioellueod). 3CC. Approval of professional pmLna Agreecart (CO 66 -31) with IL1Idan Ae,eciat" far 63 f.D. update far fiscal year 1966/67 to to* *rout of $23.000. IUD. Approval to adopt Resolution 6 tabliabig Annual Special Iat for Gsesatty facilities District 64-1 (Dry Crest) in the ,Want of $330 per acts. "SOLUTION 00. 81-l09 A 113OLMOR Of TIR City CMCIL Or Tp3 city OI WCSO COCUOICI. CALIFORNIA. SSULISRLC UfOAL MCIAL TAI FOR A CGM=in fa thin Disysti r ILL ApprdweI =yeititlae of latter lice capacity CA for espresso O.Li Mae6eaat On =. ]Fr. Added It", eat public bearing of Rey 7. 1966, for Coeov=lal and ludustrial Refuse Collection laablls{ Ordinance. Miss $.cites a.l$ to the Reecho Gcamege Kentcy.l Cede, m07Iat moved IF mltete. oecoe$ed by Kdght to approve the Gaeat Gledsr. Katie- Carol" 4-0-I Utah @bunt). 32. Approval to advattiu for bin for a... tn,tlos of traffic signal, at the follo-lns 1 «clout Aran- last* and 11.11m Neu; Tigard Avenue and 9tb; Ress Liu Red and Beryl Atnatt U.. Avser. Sea Church It rut; ta... Av.... and La en Avenue. The coat of the fin traffic aided$ 1, "Bloat" aB $370.000 to be faded it" Go Ica and 6ystaa D=alopnat Fees, Gsuall"O Debt ceteaatd staff to draft • report to coca bath at to. tins of the Capital Igcovacaat program Discussion.. with a proposal for a traffic light -hers Country Club Drive ad TL.q,d Avenue cat. ;tOIIat based by Dahl. oocedd by Val or to apnov. Gaunt Cala-dar lace, to. B. Katie. serried eeu/analy A -0 -1 Man ,boost). e... e. 7A. Dman to ncTOe rnnnt AmylnS - haustatlu of a final report of factor Control tote, In Reecho Geaaega. Cornelison Dahl rgastd this Iran be discussed at this point In the motieg. situates ,s this Its- to fella- is odes as placed an gods. ee•e.• AA. cnl>•!- rtda nntltme - Rho Council will r.I. , tvarrada directing the fles.i.{ Gcatssios to aualo. specific .lecants o! the coastal pits. Particularly IW ea and civaatties. Staff report by t. =n paserus. City .eager. ms. 9-1802=4 ca=d that Council $add to call a special matig to discuss this. ..1 City Council Wastes April 16. 1906 Tag. 6 Mr. bbb. felt 1. term of tb@ possibilities, Cooneil rind work off the Was .blab was v." for the first gmeml plan. ACTION, Council concerned that tbt7 should go forward Asa this it.. Council directed •cuff to at up s matins for @o" Tharp KAsias to discos. the traffic circulation. eeoLee Al, Ciro.. COLMS WE% (COUNCILMAN BOOM). Staff by Lear. Rammed.. City 4"sea. Mr. Vammuas report" that be bad talked rltb the Direct" of the 4.euw a" ste bad stated that funding would nut be a probl" thin year, and @0e would let s. knew whoa tbnt..wld be a prelim. AMO, loot ♦see.• 6C. atetTyyta m MMEL ,rT anon nK r n yM t r To BE Casters. wtTN CCNDO(rs Ion 211T..Onm7 STA.DA•M (COOS CIIIW Dan) , C"mil"n Dabt "AN that this it" be Continued to a ti. .ban a fall Council would be prm.m. ACTION, council eoattoved It" To 47 y. 19 86, ,too nasals 3. i. ANrNernS mttr aaANtore K. eaea'olrT rM rrtacz •T A_yL s t Mtaf e f7Anwor m CtawmtTY m7rrntn _ C ... idtmtio. at preJ.to to be food" alder the Federal Co amity Govolop"m flat Crum hear. far the M.Iftb (196F -87) prose" year. The city Aspect@ to hove a total of epprmimtd7 6760.000 Is grant foods. Staff .port by Robin To, A..miate names. 470r sing otmod the mattes for public bearieS. Addressing Council out salty reeidw, Weed Mediation bard. asked ` wheat fondles becau anllst w at a later tlm. for Council to comide. thm. There being its fvrtkn public reds"@, Mayor Cloy Clem" the public bearing. MOTION[ bred by M(kala, @moad d by snynat. to approve A@@nivtim No. 56 -110. MmIm carried maslamdy 6 -0-1 (sing abo@@U. RESOLUTION 10. 66 -110 A bnQ.OTION 07 Tn CITY CO NCIL OF TAX CITY of WCKO COCAMOCA. CALITOMNlA. ADORING n6 .DAL STATEMENT a COMMUNITY OsysCTTYSS ASC SAL=160 nwgcrs TUN 11E1MAST mO=Q FOR FOR CWUNin AnnoTWr SLOUN cmT nCCkY FOR FISCAL TSAA 190167 10 ITDR snxlrra e.. sate nee e@e 7. CITT W YY•a Klww Lamm U. O"ATY m nN Ca n. Atnnnn - hmommim of a giant aspect of Tact" Control star.@ in Rambo Cves.oasa. Staff apart by IVA Lerlm, . Ada/aietrsarm Analyst a" Cost !d"ovskl. Consultant. / 4 e City Council Niger.. April 16, lift pate 7 Also eddrusind Cwncit are Mitch perm rain, Supanlaor tot the pest Valley Your" Control DiuTict. Cathy Neatley, cad Lyle Ctoddtnlr. Meander qytbe Nut Talky factor Cast,., District. Attu Inch discussion red fcesticalq. the Council redo the fallowing nation, NOTICE. Moved by Mlkal@, Ssandal by Wright to apprawa the Contract with Nut Tall" tut" Central District. Madan carried "-I (EILS Ibeut) Also dtrected the City Ittcr-- :v Leiq deck en aCdi,a,ca sad astuu" p"ece for the district fas=tiae. @seen, Keyed ho T= Debt called • rue,, at 8.5o p.a. Th. roil{ retowaned at 9,10 D.s. with all =Ober@ but Meyer t/q present. 7k. 2jl000WEpAns flan In lltsfnt:c ftntnafia r 9tM1 f _ 4mte A mtuv, vet •rTNwrf r . Staff result by Sill loll ", :oedvai" service@ Director. Cwctil=a Nlkale fait we cSUOld look At this further cad r=so.nded at gKwig resalmtioa On tit o could fad out what the prates. with Nilees t treat wwt�d tbe. Mr. Bubb• nC[lcd n would have to good.= the homes. then the Cf" could .0 it. Nr. KerKeun. City Attorney. orated tk"e cat. a tat of det"a"in.. cad it ueald be deferred =tit later at the ti. of =setaitine. N ITIM: Mowed by Kikele. • =aedsd by {pots to table this until Inde=xing brogbt hack a repair after Comell'a =atlki an traffic circulation. Notion carried 4-0-1 (tin ab=et). RISOLEna E0. 86-111 A 1179L07Ia 0T raw CITT CWSCIL Or Tit CITY " WCID WCAWW&- CALIVCkd IA, EtCW AD N1TI10 Tll LOW 101107 As A EIGl1TICAST 11SOLIC TIA 'Vsl 07 TU CITY CN WCKC WCAXSCA AND nnouRS anxii m IT AS A C1TT als? IC Lopm., . e. eae 7C. ATf0tlfNUt s 1 f.rotldti}Irt tit ne RT1 rir+tn tDa n. ro,,s, tlrtaomdne uronn=n fen nw DDT out .0011T... t fSM101I1ai. NCTIDbt Council ce"mrrw in the gsaint =nr of Keys, Kids led C""itwom Wight to the sub,o=ittee. Eat InKlITm •. tscru��� 9. utti>th>•r MMCN. Slowed by Vitals. seeded by plight to tdjmrn. Notion carried eesntsesdy A -0-I (ticl abut) Ke,,tn adjavrned at 9137 p,. Keapectfully dJalet". 1""11 A. Anthelat v CLt) Clark ou r! .°..°• o�.$P aNl..n leper P!'.e....r ".°. ""' e a I rc 4' rr rri� °r1 «.mpm ��k» ss yr = =tII >or... ca �i- r°n zac .ri I ' �� °e €'"�rz•"T i I « s• z ... n.>zrr zr osw.>�.ig " r'r � fUg �' ' z e z i o �' � 8�io �P• i i Y� ^(s�oy I ' T is oz ng I z «w oo ilhwwl•.an�TST zn w��ia."..r.�miia F ' i .'n� �rT^ >~a� rj i+ I asi. e>c �£r°y I IaT tiz ��awc �icOYr fr °aa n z I v> zn za. as a> o z ynoi.+ Ir" '1.1 4i0 l)Mrn. 9w Vr 2° "A ° NZ—F Pn=i � t .fit � ' TY M INM O jTX� "�rY�JJ PaF�Y p° PX'�PP P° °V MM p! Nr 0°i PPFV`PY IA i a YN 00 -.P�J w0�10� Y IO P!i N.. ip•O ; � [°Ti ' I J r M r t u O e. rPMYJ. n rl rp�wu r{i O! OPlY FPP p1p "00..N N!f•pN 'lVPON�: .1 - ±Qd r f r _. n OMOM oo�morNOOpn ov«nr$ e°. i i I i 1 I i � j' I I I I I I I •aaa r.y�.iJ %�s�i._is O i s w ^ S� [i ✓J c ° i i e a m y N ell �, •�y !+ P i+N OOM 4N VP Yr YO OOV +�iPP «YwyOP P+ PO +o V! +}L' NP N l��Yy I eM �Cyvs w ~�� n n � orGT pNy^T �f �� E• z, .::R � r Mx °r°.$3 j��j••'' x t.�is O\i +aa ° i"-i •c°i "z **P eR ► z. « j Tz z a$ti .. a ��N °ao sonny :lo-i nT oN +� . AFL z� ,„y,w AT an i.� 1C A nz y Zog no�v t. -\ � i \': r-. zo zn r. was tirzz iaE'• 3s � °O\ 1�E n M I � �.i I � � •♦ b I wf• M • T Iln. � nT O Y a�NN Fzxng s�P S,�„,P.,i YgL To 'i4 �sn nr y sS z Qa�$°nz owNN °C b�a,� $g a r ! o wYZ.P °i K nz. i.l `y �i in nxv Y O• x Js Ti n` 1 Ni w TP x ,r°i� �nj:P iy a TAX O z M n n nn C nn nn nrl nn T ° g tiY yn O Or y_°i y x `°ti ►I3Oi b n .i A. _ _ wxi I M N a r o, as r y av • s• s±t_• a ii wn as � i IrP f ♦M 'ol Ny Yl NN oo eo on goo nn e« eo 00 0o ey •yo o� o� o« P_ .00 Pr �P PM PP TA yP PP SY °O YY H4 �-+. O�°O !� PJ o+ no O o.J. N 00 �° u� oapb +N� V,JLVP +aloo O +POJ yal .+. P °Lug n ,NO I • .y OOr +O I •. O! OP POIII P YO PP +�PJ 00(•YO NVOJ J, MM 4 P Jti+V• ll Y+ I YVII I I i I O i s w ^ S� [i ✓J c ° i i e a m y N ■i7 1 ri I I I I o: i N � � O 1.. Y O Y M Y �I n T oa sP T w � T P Yy x I N ^M AA 'rN e11f� � tD MN1 ,n_ t y N 1�4Y ^ T =P TMpTm y S"'SZ c 4�A K n a T n IY n r Q N • o oo P� oe6�nbYe s� ss Ix ae "1. Pe fVgsEVsiie.,.e., i PCP W4rOet�f �+W O �• C IY IY ! M J 1 T n w y.w o 4w rty+v� r owonn nP + t'P I i I I T.pi" �.o" tsic+ tiT1µ lO wf 4 C Y MP"ki i j N nr Tf n YO +I: z n n toT I ' P N IIb UO yy�n 0i J�4 �.. OO�nV� IIi .. or i `p: iY.b+�n ion a +� o•^ P II I i =1 ELI w � T P Yy x I N ^M AA 'rN e11f� � tD MN1 ,n_ t y N 1�4Y ^ T =P TMpTm y S"'SZ c 4�A K n a T n IY n r Q N • o oo P� oe6�nbYe s� ss Ix ae "1. Pe fVgsEVsiie.,.e., i PCP W4rOet�f �+W O �• C IY IY ! M J 1 T n w y.w o 4w rty+v� r owonn nP + t'P I i I I _r RMS FF _te e \w� E. �i ,. ■,! .E! © 2 J P I �) � \..� 7-7- ka (/ }) } |j � ® | -E»9� §ems � k�.1; A'\ 3�; ! k EI! ® /s' \ w� ,; -,L7 O p i r m w. m P a i 1 a n T m �, yrY'V I rr V�O. .�� PO pYyy°p Vm1et V♦. 'On NyY•N l.Vr Op PmLMr YO✓ra .r11111Njjj \YUrV prr �y N Pp .Np CO pV lDP VlynV Yr I a as s �gsio t's�iz��' ��llpprr {TyNyO Cl I iT ^zwN vvlmv Lei. °n °�°° zz MGM r'rw i:�n s > n�e°�t�� �s wn �' r oNam w« NN ll •°. m° iioi sT> by S. "'sQi Mtit' 1 ....��•• oygyy�i z'a �jy^itoc a $ �:Nn �oogTr `•i z ° Ta JS «F Ni i 'yyyrY••.i n�ti••oa. 3nNma >T� W }» Ob'i''l yy a S> rA Oy yr ONN nC� A P••n t � N 1•ni T � µ .°..°. c•°. o n I z3 n ° N i4i" ^ni I •i I T 3 SS p pe2i f. V a I T )1 I nob'e i I I yN < n av wor °a ii�•°•n wzi '•v Ia .za si °>N <« o`i =Z' n� P• °2i -F on i•°• �yoy S� �+� .nP as iri •.: r zi ie r im �zr nip 3w >N >oiiv y >i}F . .ya ^A 0 wN T•� �' z+/.ii Cvhno im > w� °w2'•f• > i .'. •n•. I I 5L Sw.oz �K •.L •>i°t nT I I > i` o �N•w�.. yo i'• rR R ww 9 + (� > Y INr 1 p•�t}. r< yl r I I � nn nn�+t+ � n nn =e 'n• n nn n•N�. r z_ •L°°�..� 'j�'y� °.'. tz-5 «� �j•• z; w=i 27 wz. n t I TA g A��ra A rsi iA ^TZ .z.�iTii Uzi. iA iTy LF I hh N.'• NM .z•w w 'r N NN ` NN I i I no yy �oyy I{• yy n-°1 °I j Nn My v r y� y.o. .fi.°• yy �yf•o° .°i aP Pm YN Oi YPp !I IN r YN ✓O Or °I• QO nM dP OOI yN 1 �rr �e PpLlw a an g~I n !Y� p ♦yn PP '''.On Py Y Pu oo.°.N•N r LP °ao Y°• MI I rr oy #y. n .ai.Nri�wRN. .. t.N me �•0 r I i I I NO Vn i PN{.On I Rp OL N nA OY.anO I nVNVC I Pn�'� t II fPll I I i I I I I I I I -,L7 O p i r m w. m P a i 1 a n T m z a: CC J Ss C.N pY �� nni• rfw 'nm NJ ^r writ i'l I I r�ryf nN f1 G•Nq ^ l��> Y T ON I hi p� Oy eI� !N NT ♦ �L1 /{n.�G >Z N> >���y 1Y mi � Oi1w> r°•r N't N .wT a is}}y�.<T J111 hT wN ia_ti3 JYI NN • \01 At y0_ NN v 2 w s z P P ° i r i I I I I � I I o r• r r r N «N T ` «.z•. Yew r I , ° on e2 100. 1 oe on"yo ou Cn Y�• PP OP �P J� Jy J �Y Y 1�I Ia !UI 0J Yr Oe PP VU OO �N !V ;• 2 l y fT� Pi�P YM V II) 9 u '•' vy �� vv nos iv .- °o os i.�- a.`• i � s 0o n% oo �.< oosu.0 oe• ou V - oa IW ou�or ou oo'•PU rur.o °n oa aw oo iY I I I I I I I I I , � I -=.rr r,,. •_.._ r..- ...- ._:::_ Ln - ----mow ,m m 1 i A!/UM A" M AtCOHOUC VIVlAAOA UCOU" T. Oy.r.. N Ak. k 3.wgr 4mr1 IWSemmr. CAO. I;SI/ Sur�r:aM_l w..— 3si.. 1. nROI W UCDdRS1 143 .w.gQ ft p3 rr sus I[!.I 3 rx4r �J S / Iec� Ii c7 /'�� A(lA.• O Ar{.C..1. 1.s. 10 p 9ror Or.. A1-+5 tl[!vx M. GtOn'rF+GLL Cm 1�.1 1 MAAIl4 7S AIHICJJOOI u..rn OrF ELI. Cxnn9 SW L Ju0 Jr 1 TTIOSI M iWWCTK)KV IQ m TM •ILY i! •. Ar D1AL R 'D _ 1 Ibr M M.w.. -HrW M Str ]xxr IDDSDIll st.d. CDIW a, CAr. CA..r /. M Frrn MW. 16 F.w Tw w A.1...0 � M r..r.rw O h Akd.4 l.I..O. C..dbr.rl.l. 1 .1MC -D D.• IT 41r..' T{ 5- r..' .Mr..fMlflw�r.tl.ulvW4.1.0MYwt.r r. MlW .gi[eYa I= A.+xr.. ri.. W .Sr .D.rM md./.0 ...W S..wr Ir.... H Sa.. M h q.;&w .1 • 5...... W h)YV.i....kL..s.r....rrd.._ -. rFa MArrN..r Mr.. A1.4A. 1...•m. C. m 11 VATS 5Y CAOIOMII Cr w La Yrnudlm O.r r -: • -5I Aw .r.y r..r� --'- rr r.F. r.�r..�r.... n.�.. +...r.rw rw •..+�.. ♦...� 14 A c,,,tM /fir A►JtSCAYION BY YMMItOR 11 Sul! W MWOOAA .r .�.... A.. � ..� Y.r.. wr. YY, r... ...1 r. •1� wv Y w .�� w . rw ..r.r M r w... ..� IS lA...ld V lk.rdd 11. r....wd a lk....41 14 tk.r NrrxJ 3SD NN M.4r lri.r nb u..I f.u.1..e..N uw o* A..d" ❑ b.11.r D m _ 1 QD xkYd.r.s+oL . COVES AWIm f PiAIA Cw7-&-z IV c A Music Pta s TOES HAfYET: 9114 rTOOTH /LL .thty r cocAno AbtWwhTf Caet&R XusE. f RASA CeN7M PR&VC Y' a.,t �NTCY. N6 GENERAL COMMEWAL Za mr, A Adj.acru�Rup=rxs NoM ' REsibty jAL. L SuurN ' RESIOC*rIAL M14 FAST GENERAL CoosmgML (EMPTY) War GENERAL CTOM?4=UAL. (G�McO cEArTER� 3o N �. JF flxvn� 146"5 Ja1 OFw .iuppcca 'C FTLL1 01,16, tJrtzc esds t ctoraWs VI[TOV Narlei C' ar•v 's ppCe Al "If YOMW d 130 34 3 / 6 e�5� 9 /to 4170 f PiAIA Cw7-&-z IV c A Music Pta s TOES HAfYET: 9114 rTOOTH /LL .thty r cocAno AbtWwhTf Caet&R XusE. f RASA CeN7M PR&VC Y' a.,t �NTCY. N6 GENERAL COMMEWAL Za mr, A Adj.acru�Rup=rxs NoM ' REsibty jAL. L SuurN ' RESIOC*rIAL M14 FAST GENERAL CoosmgML (EMPTY) War GENERAL CTOM?4=UAL. (G�McO cEArTER� 3o N �. JF COPY.._�..Y..1. ft..... I.. .......P. " ANt1CAnON NN A="OUC lhr A UM MIN 1 "FINS) IN OWINIS) RI 110.'46 gL •p6 T. O.rw.+. J A6.%gk M...P. C.."I W Sus SW l mr2 ttJftO,T ya IMI I bt1TP"IlAd COOS Ills S.o...w. CYC PHIS �.S.re.rdlro 2. I k%" Or A"UCAMO) AmmY A. k210:: O ' VIII. 11a(T TYA MA +DS. SSA 1/ r t11.. O.n uanAlu. st . 1 1TrkT) Or iSAMACrOO" m tc ITIt s Amul r.. 115.W :r 20 a 11.r..11d.w. I1lkuAl 1 1.1.f...1 l,s.,wn -IWr w1 Swr t)/0 SawlW C., ..r a, San MC.ul�.1� Atro IOTA. 491.00 ClO I M p..4w. M h AIa:Y1 Cr.1 b p rlpbww M h O.P.,r..I p^ hMl , 11 [�y4.'T15'..wrr MPwlOwrws ... Y.J dYV/1..Y r.. M.n .ppm Mw..O. Ca,rM 4_ 11 STAIII OF [Al1IOWA C.nry M -IN 11SIY29IIIP - Dw.- i/1TL46. .. .+. r....rrr..��.0 .rrr. n... Ia Sw kM / APPLICATION RT TRAI/SFTROR IS STATS a CAUIO C. .1... ..... —.. .— .— .- ...D.r... _.— .-- ..._. -__ D. kw WIS. DA-- TAW 1.1.1 Fw O1Pwlw1.1 tlw O+Tl O t.sMl 13 -- ❑ R1.r..A h Y rY w om. 3/ BRNK of Amete 1 A I WY EA W., Ej / rim / . �m ff s8 AASL r 1� � _ %6UKUMt I. ,fMAl" SWO S"sciut- 3� ROptATY WRi(t6my Zoos NIGH *k A"4 Z;K W '( ZON/YL sFAyJ&C Pr.aeav AWTP : &FDAah ktsnw+�tc SDUTN : Canatte L OffZft EAST 'JAW RMWIN f- CALYA cas1A NkAf4 -4wt,) U)'sr IAA RC -BIAS jAL i -19 -- -- - -- - cLAlx or _ yEBOl IfAlcDUS sRel(. sea. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 0��- vs P1?m 1"A1 ST1a�Sk.Hlog 3CJVLI SMFfIa jJrjNr �? clr SSR001 PI1TP1ST1 SlV-CZ 1WC (%.aCA.VR" TO THE CLE6x or TIM city or RAxC110 cucAmwcA ----------- ----- ------You are hereby notified that _ Laroy— Ralcolm 5ha—w _sress to 7611 oartm h. Avenual O camnga _G1 —91770 _ — — _ claims damages from the accident of _ _ Apri11, 966 — — — — — _ In the amscnt, computed as of the date of presentation of this claim, of $_1,40ACo0_04 _ _ _ — — . This claim is based on personal injuries sustained by claimant on or about — — April 1,_19116 — — — — — — —, in the vicinity of _ _Etivanda _High _ _ _ Bchool under the following circumstance, Plitnblfl va—a anliited to ualp mote . automobile to a different ..to shop ATC4. Shtu 111 ltactutu 1ch14—Lfs to The name (a) of the public employes (9) causing claimant's injuries under the described circumstances _ _ _ _ _ _ can Ta for The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of this claim, is computed as follows, Approximate' damps incurred to date $_Vysearpa,r(pQ, Expense@ for medical and hospital care $_Dn +ncnr4alrlpd L•sa if earnings = Una- rerralned Special damages for property $_ _ - -0 _ — General dam;,es 9_1001000_00 _ Total approximate damages incurred to date $100,006.0u _ Estimated prospective damages as far as known $ gnngeltainer _ Future expeaes for medial and hospital care $_Vnancgrta }-pd Future loss of earnings S_onannrla3n14 Other prospective damages $— anaacertelnyd Prospective general damages $_Vyuncarna}I2d Total estimated prospective damages $ unnscS[59149d Total amount claimed as of date of presentation of claim $_100,000_00 — _ All notices of other communications with regard to this claim should be sand to claimant at Douglas 0. I1clarus, Attorney at Law, 15910 Ventura Boulevard, Suits 1702, gnaim, Californii 91676 DATED, AP[il IB _1986 — — LAN OFFICES OF DOUGLAS C. tNeRARU9 UG 4. 1 1 1 ATf061 Y FOR CfdI1fA7T :1 :•1 33 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES APD. PERSONAL INJURY CLAIM OF _ 1r M MALN10 SMN J& — — — — — — — — va SII/ ?iAT Vj &T1wA"ALEUC3 SCBG91.1 SQdTlla JOINS _ 3+102! SIJr6 6,OU0111RUTA11n Sl) —9f MCZHI1 QKbn NOA TO Ten CLRRR OP_TEE_CIS_Y OP_M_M_CEO COGMO. cG _ _ _ _ — — — — — — — j You are hereby notified that _ _L6roy Malcgc Sher ,Jr._ _ _ whore addraae is 711E Dartmouth Avenue] Cucecnga CA 91770 _ _ _ _ _ claims derares from the accident of _ _ April 7 _1966 _ _ _ _ _ _ in the mount. couputed as of the Race of presentation of air claim, of $- 10Wp90aog _ _ _ _ _ Thi9 claim !a based an personal injuries sustained by claimane an or about — — April 1 _19th _ _ _ _ _ _ _, in the vicinity of _ t_ti_wa_nd_a _E1g1 — — _ School =der the following circumrtance Plafatlfl vas snliatad to Iw1D cave a automobile to a different auto shop Awe. Sasin9 _tAt+'nva.Jh141ntita5gcalYaO SMm Jil S:sclu:w Sa.hia_Ieft lc The caw (a) of the public employee (a) causing claimant's injuries under the described circumstances _ _ _ _ _ _ an 'faller _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ The mount claimed, u of the date of preaeatatlou of this claim, is eocputod as follwn s _ Approximstx.gea incurred to date $_Onscr�eriaggd Eqy nsas for medical and hospital care $_1nase4r5algF4, Lou of earnings $_OnaAcnrtainaa Spacial damegas for property $— — _ ? — — — General damages $_1004000_Oc — — Toesl opprorlaate damages incurred to date $IOO,000.OU _ Estimated prospective damages as far as known $ unaaSereaine.0 _ Future aspenses for medical enf hospital care 9_ansucsrSaynsd Future lost of earnings 8 anascyr&&Ird0 Other prospeetive damages 0_Vnalccrrq}rgd Frospactive getaral darages $ VAae��rtatg9d Total estimated prospectiva damages $ OnaLcirtsaw Total amount cla d as of data of praatation of claim 9_100A000_o0 All notices of other communications with regard to this claim should be send to claimant at Douglas G. McRatva, Attorney at Law, I3910 Ventura Doulevud, Suite 17010 Encino, Californid 91116 DATED: AprilIt _1966 — — UW OFFICES OF DOUGLAS 0. McRARUS DA ATTORNEY FOR CLtL1AMr 1, 3-11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 WELDON DIGGS A Professional Law Corporation 396 West Foothill Boulevard Claremont, CA 91711 711/621 -2931 AttGrney for Claimant, HEATh EDWARD THOMPSON, a minor cc d� -ao In the Matter of the Claim of ) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO F.CATG EDWARD THOMPS04, A minor,) PRESENT LATE CLAIM oy and through his Guardian ad ) (Government Code Section .:item, CHRISTINE M. THOMPSON, ) 911.0 ugainst CITY OF RANCHO ) CUCAMONGA ) TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: 1. Application 1 isrtereby made to present a late claim under Section. 911.4 of the Government Code. The claim is founded on a cause of action for personal'injuryr which injury occurred on November 18, 1985, and for which a claim was not presented within the 100 -day period provided by section 911.1 of the Government Code. For additional circumstances relating to the cause of action, reference is made to the proposed claim attached hereto as Exhibit `A• and made a part hereof. 2. The reason that no claim wag presented during the period of time provided by section 911.•4 of the Government Code is that the claimant BEATH EDWARD THOMPSON was a minor during all of the 100 -day period specified by section 711.2 for presentation of the claim. 3. This application is presented within a reasonable time after the accrual of the cause of action as shown by the Declaration of Weldon Diggs, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 315� I WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that this 2 application be granted and that the attached claim be received.. 3 and acted upon in accordance with Sections 911.4 through 911.5 4 of the Government Code. 5 B DATED: April 21, 1966 _ _ Z",/- a- 7 WELDON DIGGS A Professionul Law C rlation 5 Attorney for Claimant 9 10 11 12 Yu 13 14 15 15 17 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 27 25 _2_ u Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION 02 WET-DON DIGGS I, AELDON DIGdS, declare as followsl - I. I am an attorney at law licensed to practice before all courts of this State and before this administrative board. I represent the claimant in the above - entitled action. If called on to testify, I would and could competently testify to each of the following facts, said facts being within my personal knowledgo. 2. At all times hereinmentioned, claimant was, and still is, a minor. 3. This office was retained on or about January 28, 1906. Investigation int6 -efie accident and possible liability of the'la City of Rancho Cucamonga wall completed on or about March 26, 1986, which is after the expiration of the 100 -day filing period. I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing Is true and correct. Executed this 2lat day of April, 1986, at Claremont, California. 1AJiDIGGS �' _ B E L D O N GS -3- 37 1 1 2 3 s 5 .. u 7 9 9 '0 W41 .3 1< . II I� �I .J 22 23 .A :5 _u 27 36 PROPOSED CLAIM OF HEATH EDWARD THOMPSON AGAINST THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1. The claimant's name and address are as follows: HEATL, EDWARD THOMPSON, a minor, by and through hie Guardian ad Litem, CHRISTINE N. THOMPSON, 7811 San Diego Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 2. Notices concerning this claim should be sent to: WELDON DIGGS A Professional Law Corporation 396 West Foothill Boulevard Claremont, CA 91711 3. Claimant wa jured on November 18, 1985, in an Y automobile accident n Big Tree Road, one mile north of Almond,`ss in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. G. At all times hereinmentioned, said Big Tree Road was in a dangerous and defective condition in that it was not properly maintained so as tc allow a rut to exist on the roadwayt and further, barriers were not present to prevent vehicles from going ever the side of the cliff that runs adjacent to said portion of Big Tree Road. 5 Claimant suffeted a mild compression fracture of LI and an open Grade 1 undisplaced fracture of the right lateral malleolus. E. The names of the public employees causing claimant's injuries are unknown. 7. The amount claimed as of the date of presentation of this claim is $500,000.001 8. The total amount of medical expenses Licurred to date are unknown at this time. 9. The estimated future medical expenses are unknown at this time. 10. The amount of estimated future wage loss is unknown at this time. 11. General damages total $5CO3OOO. 0. DATED: April 21, 1986 WELDON DIGG A Professional corporation MOWN for Claimant 38 I !i M 0 I CLAIM OP SEATH EDWARD THOMPSON AGAINST THE 2 • CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3 TO: CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA a 1. The claimant's name and address are as follows: 5 HEATH EDWARD THOMPSON, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, 6 Q USTINE M. THOMPSON, 7.11 San Diego 7 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 8 2. Notices concerning this claim should be sent to: 9 WELDON DIGGS A Professional Law Corporation 10 396 West Poothill Boulevard Claremont, CA 91711 tt 3. Claimant was injured on November 18, 1985, in an 12 automobile accideaer6n Big Tree Road, one mile north of Almon�j% in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 13 ♦. At all times hereinmentioned, said Big Tree Road was in to a dange =ous and defective condition in that it was not properly maintained so as to allow a rut to exist on the roadway; and 15 further, barriers were not present to prevent vehicles from going over the side of the cliff that runs adjacent to said 16 portion of Big Tree Road. 17 S. Claimant suffered a mild compression fracture of LI and an open Grade 1 undisplaced fracture of the right lateral :8 malleolue. 19 6. The names of the public employees causing claimant's injuries are unknown. 20 7. The amount claimed as of the date of presentation of 21 this claim is $500,000.00; 22 8. The total amount of medical expenses incurred to date are unknown at this tire. 23 9. The estimated future medical expenses are unknown at 24 this time. 25 30. The amount of estimated future wage loss is unknown at this time. 26 11. General damages total $500,000. 0. Y7 DATED: April 21, 1986 , rA 26 WSLDON DIGG ,3 A Professional w orporatirn .. Attorney for Claimant 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 s t0 tt 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF PRESENTATION OF CLAIM BY MAIL (C.C.P. Section 1013a(1)) I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the claim affixed to this declaration. I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County of San Bernardino, California. My business address is 396 Feat Foothill Boulevard, Claromont, California, 91711. I presented the affixed Application for Leave to Present Latc Claim, and Claim of Beath Edward Thompson against the City of Rancho Cucamonga by depositing tho originals thereof in the United States mail at Claremont California on this , , ,�1- day of April, 1986, at thr United States Post Wice in Claremont, California, in a sealecr' envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, with the name and address shown on the envelope as follows: City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clerk, City Ball 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 At the time of deposit, there was regular delivery by the United States mail between the place of deposit and the place of address. I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day of April, 1986, at Claremont, California. DON1U 0 IRGONA 7 O 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 Mark S. Rosen CORBETT, STEELMAN 6 BALMACES a Professional Law Corporation 18200 Von Warman Ave., Suite 200 Irvine, California 92715 (714) 553 -9266 Attorneys for Pacer Homes, Inc. In Re CLAIM OF PACER HOMES, INC. cc. k & --:2! S 7a A. 61- CLAIM It To the City of Rancho Cucamonga and to its Mayor, City Council and Clerk: Pacer Homes, Inc. hereby claims from the City of Ran ho Cucamonga the sum of $54,118.00, to paid in the iora of credit against storm drain fees incurred in the construction and development of tract no. 12532. The address of Pacer Homes, Inc. is 601 North Parkcenter Drive, Suite 260, Santa Ana, California 92705. All notices should be said to the law firm of Corbett, Steelman and Balmages, 18200 Von Warman Avenue, Suite 200, Irvine, California 9271°, (714) 553 - 9266. 7� 1 Tract No. 12532 is located between Archibald Avenue 2 and Ramona Street, and West of Monte Vista. On April 25, 1984, 3 the Planning Commission of Rancho Cucamonga passed Revolution 4 No. 84 -34, conditicnally approving tentative tract map no. 5 12532. 6 Section 2 of Revolution 84 -34, under the subtitle 7 'engineering division', paragraph 5, states: 8 'A portion of the master plan storm drain on Aamora 91 Avenue shall be constructed from the project sttw to 10 south of the Southern Pacific Railroad to the 11 satisfaction of the City Engineer. The storm drain 12 fees 4 the project will be credited for this ?s 13 construction.* (Emphasis added). 14 On June 20, 1984, the City Council adopted Resolution 15 84 -180 approving tentative tract map no. 12532 under the 16I conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolutioa 84 -34, 17 including the conditions set forth above. 18 Pursuant to these resolutions, Pacer Homes, Inc. 19 obtained all necessary permits to commence construction and has 20 in fact commenced construction of single family residence 21 properties on tract no. 12532. In addition, in reliance upon 22 the provision set forth above, Pacer Homes, Inc. constructed a 23 storm drain from tle project site to south of the Southern 24 Pacific Railroad. Pacer expended $69,878.00 on the 25 construction of said sturm drain. 26 In spite of paragraph 5 as set forth above, the City 27 Engineer informed Pacer Homes, Inc. on January 8, chat 28 Pacer Homes would only obtain credit against storm drain fees 2 1/1) 1 in the amount of $15,760.00. 2 Pacer Homes v.aims that the distinctionu drawn by the 3 City Engineer are w chout reasonable basis, and claims the q balance of $54,11x.00, as an additional credit against storm 5 drain fees. 6 P,cet tomes further claims that the City Engineer, and 7 the City of Ra,cho Cumcamonga, are estopped from asserting that g the storm drain fa:ilities as constructed are not in compliance g with paragraph 5, in that neither the City Engineer nor any 20 other official of the city gave any notice to Pacer Homes at 11 any time that the construction of the storm drain was not in 12 compliance with -the standard of the City Engineer or that other 13 construction could have been performed that would have been in 14 compliance with the standard of the City Engineer. 15 I Wherefore Facer Homes, Inc, claims the sum of 16 $54,118.00 to be paid in the form of a credit against storm 17 drain fees. 19 l DATED: Ar�/� (P }I9gG CORBETT, STE 6 LMAGES 20 21 0y: RUSEN 22 A orneys for Pacer Homes, Inc. 23 25 23 27 28 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer neo PVC '`%i C 1977 SUBJECT: Approval of Common Use Agreement between San Bernardino County Flood Control District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the Construction, Operation and Maintenance of a New Reinforced Box Culvert for Lemon Avenue Across the Alta Loma Channel The attached subject aiVppecwent between the City and the San Bernardino County Flood Control DKtrict allows for the construction, operation and maintenance of a new 14' W x 8' H Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert for Lemon Avenue across the Alta Loma Channel (said channel is the property of San Bernardino County Flood Control District). Said street and channel Improvements will be constructed in-conjunction with the City's Capital Improvement Project for the reconstructftn of Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue. RECOMMOATION It .s recomxmended that City Council Vopt the attached resolution approving the Common Use Agreement between the San Bernardino County .load Control District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfu'ly submit ed, LBH:LEH:bc Attachments //7 . ycnr,,b SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STANDARDCONTRACT FOR DISTRICT USE OW.V rr.ip,pun. CONSENT TO COMmu 'r.em•r `.. e.ai�ure e.. owwmrerrw.0 USE AGAEEt�HT AL7A tnv .emo"w ra•waq STORM DRAIN a t A THIS CONTRACT Is rntetd Into In the State of California by and batmen the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, hereafter Called the District, and hereafter called. CITY Rancho Cucavanea CA 91730 r.}r.I 1D H0 w8w4�a,euriry MO IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS. lute Ad" below and dd dond bond dine Sfr forth apvEr ro ea tarmW%anounr tL be paid, manner of peymrnt dn,r for perfomwnor or cvnplldm, dlRmr/Ndon of nb*yWrory parfonr.M W came for bmdnadon, other Irma and condddmt and atrrJr p /ana, rpec'dcaama and aA*ndVfmy1 W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, CITY desires to effect, at CITY cost, the construction, operation and maintenance of a new reinforced box culvert for Lemon Avenue across the Alts Lora Channel which operation and maintenance will necessitate CITY'S use of certain rights -of -way for road purposes therefor; and WHEREAS, said rights-of -way will occupy, in part, portions of the DISTRICT owned lands, hereinafter called °DISTRICT LANDS "; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to construct, operate and maintain sold new reinforced box culvert and appurtenances within DISTRICT LANDS and within bdjoining CITY owned lands, which DISTRICT and CITY lands are hereinafter referred to as *AREAS OF COMMON USE*, which AREAS OF CCHMON USE are described on attached "Exhibit A• and shown on attached plat map marked "Exhibit B "; and WHEREAS, DISTRICT desires to preserve, maintain, construct and operate flood control and water conservation works within and across said AREAS OF COHHCN USE; ""e F C.D. COPY FA1860l ,� „� NON, THEREFORE, IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: DISTRICT hereby consents to, CITY'S conrtruction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of a reinforced box culvert and appurtenances thereto, at CITY'S expense within the AREAS OF COMMON USE and to allow CITY and the traveling public to occupy and use said AREA OF COMMON USE for street and highway purposes; provided, however, that no such construction, rconstruotlon, maintenance, operation, occupancy, or use shall be effected �. CITY, its successors or assignat In any manner which, in the opinion of the Chief Engineer of the DISTRICT, my interfere or conflict with any structures, facilities operations or urea which DISTRICT has or intends to have upon said lands, without first submitting plans of such occupancy or use to DISTRICT'S Chief Engineer at least 30 days prior to the dote of such intended occupany or use and obtain his written approval therefor, which approval shall not be withheld, if in the opinion of the Chief Engineer, the proposal does not interfere or conflict with the DISTRICT'S interest*; and providing ic further that conflict with-the DISTRICT'S interests; and providing further that CITY, its successors and assigns shall assume full responsibility for the c,erati�n and maintenance of the reinforced box culvert and roadway facilities 'including all roadway culverts, pipes and those portions 01 tht reinforced box culvert structure, including approaches, sidewalks and other appurtenant works, located above the bottom plane of the reinforced box culvert seats or soffit of deck structure, whichever is lowest). 2. CITY acknowledges DISTRICT'S right to AREAS OF COMMON USE and the priority of DISTRICT'S right within DISTRICT LANDS. DISTRICT has and reserves the right to use AREA OF COMMON USE in any manner not in conflict with CITY'S needs for the proposed Improved publia roadway, vlthout necessity for any further permit or permission from CITY. Except in emergencies, CITY shall give reasonable notice to DISTRICT before performing any work on CITY'S facilities in sold AREAS OF COMMON USE, where such work will be performed within channel or levee areas, or which said work will in any way alter or obstruct the flow of or potential flow of waters within said flood control and water conservation works. Page 2 of 3 TA18601 3. CITY hereby consents to the construction, reconstruction, main,.cnancc, operation or use by DISIRICT. its contractors, agents and employees, of flood control and water conservation facilities and appurtenances thereto- under, over, upon and along sold A ?EAS OF COMMON USE, upon and subject to the torus and conditions herein contained. D. CITY shall indemnify and hold the DISTRICT and el officers, employees, and agents of said public body free and harmless from any and every claim, demand or action for damages, or Injury to any person or persons or property of any kind whatsoever, and shall assume any cost or expense in connection therewith, and agrees to defend the DISTRICT, the County of San Bernardino, and all officers, employees and agents of said public bodies against any claims or demands which may arise out of or result from the CITY'S occupation and activities within AREA OF CCHMON USE. 5. DISTRICT anal!, except irrjWgenoies, give reasonable notice to CITY before = s performing any work on CITY'S facilities in said AREA OF COMMON USE. THIS AGREEMENT shall Inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the suc- cessors and assigns of both parties. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Chairman, Boanf of Supers on Dated ATTESTED: Secretary of the Flood Control District MorovCtl/s N \lipW F. rM ato AINm „1., Gnry C4.nVw _ Om On, 0x•1243"97 M,. 11/x0 �( ;j _ CITY OF RANCHO Cn.AMONGA /sbe (IOOew,4ad,, 4a•ri�.Y. 4CJ BY � I.wrAOnM Spwrunl Dated Address • A2,n„ Aa Wp W /CAO V.. p., _L w 3 FA18601 EXHIBIT A Those portions of lots F and G, Foothill Fr03tlee3 Fruit Company Subdivision No. 2, as per plat recorded in Book 20 of Nape, page ;Y, records of sold County, described as follows: "PARCEL A" The South 8.00 feet of said Lot F, Foothill Froetless Fruit Company Subdivision No. 2. Containing 0.009 acres, more or less. "PARCEL V The North 8.00 feet of sold Lot 0, Foothill Frontless Fruit Company Subdivision No. 2. Containing 0.009 acres, mor£ or less. /49 M8601 �Rmftwwo 1"-1la' 1r.rm ka ew=w= (See O R /- 400/83) � D n In •D � 270 nA l� � TENT '•• °:; , "' TRACT 10076 T_� .tuu ro .o 35 r a L /J r"�!t 22 n 21 S i LC o9a 3 G } 2400 m a,,, y 7 OCO \ 5/41 4\ e -- 6 17 -- — D 2206 24ce ° m OCD .ILet ]a � — LEMON -- +nTSr <e•< s/nay ALTA LOMA STORM DRAIN LOT 30, FOOTHILL FROSTLESS FRUIT CO SUBDIVISION No.2, MO 20/34 49 To, P: Fa w .I J ID ID W.S.G. ID -31 -B4 mm O. P. 1 400/ 74 ..a., RESOLUTION NO. -&Q& -0i.c" I 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A COMMON USE AGREEMENT FROM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to establish requirements for construction of reinforced concrete bOA culvert across the Alta Loma Channel In conjunction with the Lemon Avenue Reconstruction Project. reinforred bOX WHEREAS, eirtandaappurtenances swithin District owned lands nansaid ithin adjoining City owned lands. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Common Use Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City_ Clerk to record same in V.*rDffice of the County Recorder of San Bernardino''" County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this Sth day of May, 1986 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Bever y ut a et, ty fferE Jeffrey K ng, yor S6 CITY OF FANCHO CITCAIISONGA �CLICAAF STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 firm I TO: City Council and City Manages FROM: Lloyd T. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Blane M. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: DECLARATION OF A.P. 229 - 261 -64 AS SURPLUS PROPERTY AND NOTICE IIIYITING SEALED BIDS FOFTffE-M THEREOF In response to purchase inquiries for the referenced parcel, the following has been determined: The subject property was lxWBoired by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on March 9 ?s 1982, for the puroose of ca"nstructing 6th Street between Buffalo and Rochestzr Avenues. This construction was part of Assessment District 82 -1. Excess property was obtained in the original acquisition to remove the creation of an uneconomic remnant to the original property created by the roadway crossing at mid- section to the property. Those excess portions of the subject parcel beyond the roadway "right-of -way' are now the subject of purchase inquiries by interested parties. It is noted that the primary intent of the original acquisition, providing a roadway �tght- of•way, has been met and that Insufficient property DO acres) remains to be of beneficial use by the City other than for surplus sale. A minimum bid price has been established at S9D.GOO representing the costs Incurred by the City to acquire and Improve the parcel to its present condit Ion. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the nroperty be declareJ excess property and be advertised for taie to the general public. Adoption of the be Resolution 0csn on May 21 1986, property hthe hour of 2 :30 p.m. Iful Attachrents ITI RESOLUTION NO..E65 -9110M "G —1) 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DELCARiNG ITS INTENTION TO SELL FEE TITLE TO CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURES SPECIFIED HEREIN A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the owner of that certain real property generally located at the intersection of Buffalo Avenue and 6th Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, hereinafter referred to as *said property and specifically described as st . forth in Exhibit -A- attached hereto and by this reference set forth herein. 01) Fee title in and to said property is not and will not in the Immediate future be required for public purposes. (III) California Government Code Section 37350 provides as follows: -A city may purchl,,e�,. lease, receive, hold, and enjoy real and personal prt$erty, and control and dispose of it for the common benefit.- (iv) California Government Code Section 37351 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: -The legislative body (City Council) may . dispose of, and convey such property for the benefit of the city. occurred. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have B. Resolution. N0'a, THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. All facts stated in the Recitals. Part A, of this Resolution hereby are found to be tMe aid correct. 2. The Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby announce its intention to sell said property In accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in paragraph 3 of this Resolution to any person submitting the highest bid therefor. 3. The sale of said property is proposed upon the following terms and conditions: A. Said property viii be sold as is and with all faults and no warranties shall attach to the sale of said property by the City of Rancho cuctmonga. Sc) RESOLUTION NO. EGE- 07 -16R Page 2 B. The minimum total sales price to be paid by the purchaser of said property will be the sum of $90,000 ' Oars. C. All bidders shall submit with their written bids a cashier's check made payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the amount of bid as a gvarantee that each such bidder will consummate the sale contemplated here'i if it constitutes the high bidder. Said check shall be refundable t. any bidder whose bid is not accepted as the high bid. Any bid suhmittel which does not contain such a cashier's check shall be considered ronrtspon!ive and shall be disregarded. 0. The cashier's check of the high bidder shall be held until the total sales price for said iroperty is tendered and said cashier's check will be credited as part payment of the sales price due. In the event that the high bidder refuses or fails to tender the remainder of the purchase price within ten (10) days after the notice of award of sale is mailed to said bidder, said cashier's check shall be retained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall then be considereQp be nonrefundable. In that regard, any bidder shall be deemed to have ack *owledged the fact that it is difficult, if not ' impossible, to determine the damages to the City of Rancho Cucamonga which would be incurred should a hi7h bidder not timely consummate the sale of said property. Accordingly, said ten percent (10%) cashier's check shall be considered payment by way of liquidated damages for failure of the high bidder to tender the remainder of the purchase price. E. The total payment shall be made in cash by cashier's check payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. F. Upon receipt of the total payment, as specified in Paragraph 3.E. above, the City Clerk shall deliver the original fully executed deed to the purchaser. G. In case of identical bids, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall make an award to t^2 high bidder of its choice in its sole discretion. H. The Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga specifically reserves the right to reject all bids received with respect to the contemplated sale of said property. I. All original bids together with the above- referenced cashier's check must be tendered in sealed enveiopes and presented to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, on or before May 21, 1986 at 2:30 p.m. J. Said property is offered subject to any and all covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, rights, the high bidder may arrange for the purchase of a title insurance rolicy, of said high bidder's choice, provided that all payments for premiums related to said policy shall be at the sole cost of the buyer. K. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will not pay any real estate commission related is the sale of said property or have any such S3 RESOLUTION NO. EOS -07 -164 Page 3 commission or any portion thereof deducted from the price paid. Resolution. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ey King, Mayor ATTEST: every A. Authelet, City Cler 1. BEVERLY A. AUTNELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held an the * day Of *, 19**. Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamonga, California. every A. Autheler—at—yn—err _� Yt`• EEMIBIT "a" That portion of Lots 37 and 38 of Rochester in the City of Rancho rucamonga, County of San Bernardino, as per map recorded in Book 9, Page 20 of Naps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 37; thence, North 890 45' 05' East along the North line of said Lot 37, a distance of 362.02 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southeast having a radius of 580.00 feet, a radial line through said point bears North 180 45' 26' West; thence Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 520 34' 45', an arc length of 532.25 feet to a point in the Westerly line of said Lot 36, a radial line through said last mentioned point bears North 710 20' 11' West; thence North 000 09' 18' East along West line of said Lots 37 and 38 a distance of 362.02 feet to the Point of Beginning. Except therefrom; that portion beginning at a point on the north line of said Lot 37 a distance of 282.27 feet from said point of beginning; thence North 890 45' 05' East along North line of said Lot 37 a distance of 79.75 feet to a Point on a curve concave to the Southeast having a radius of 580.00 feet a radial line through said point bears North 180 45' 26' West; thence Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 520 34' 45' an arc length of 532.25 feet to a point in the West line of said Lot 38, a radial line through said last mentioned point bears North 710 20' 11' West; thence s North 000 09' 18' East alo'iblthe West line of Lots 37 and 38 a distance of " 79.70 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southeast having a radius of thence Northeasterly along tsaid 9 d curvethhrroiughbaacentralhanglelof 380 201 West, 4' an arc length of 408.19 feat to a point in the North line of said Lot 37, a radial line through last mentioned point bears North 250 52' 46' West, last mentioned point also being the point of beginning. Such real property being retained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street and realted utility purposes. Real Property Contains 30,840.40 Square Feet. Exhibit 'B' attachb: `zretc and made a part hereof by this reference. 55 I�I 01 4IL>• �I t L4'I f / / / I I I� C—FD WV c S h1 BRASS UP I FOR N U4 CCR. 5Ec 15 PER RS 44 /44C.S.F6. wo/oD �a E8S4/z2�DO+N V PM o: Ito I~ i II r REA 2.27'°400.4 1 r�1 r N fo3.37' 39" ZRq -� FtL V I,P. {7310 "CITY ENS RCM 2.3669' PLUSII No RCE o.ob- E of U�IE AC.c.IAS CY4 s6c.16, NO= Fm 559o). 1' LP. 4 - JAG 'R.CE IMDEYM or( M LINE O.O FLLyzH. (46F R CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE EXHIBIT APN 229 -2&1-to4 A CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of two Subordination Agreements for Parcel Map 8100, I located on the northeast corner of Ramona Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, submitted enter and Foothill Property. 'afs Two Lien Agreements were approved by City Council on December i2, It for the following: 1. Construction of missing off -site improvements. 2. Improvement and Maintenance Agreement for an open channel. In order to secure financing for their project, the lender requires that the Lien Agreements be subordinate to liens in favor of the lender. Gary Kanter Associates has submitted the attached Subordination Agreement for City Council approval RECO!"MATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving said Subordination Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Res ctfully subnl#tted, /� L6H• as L7 1. S/ Recordlnqq requested by: City of Went Cuca onga then recorded sil to: City of A0 Cucamonga ACRrrxrmi city Box ROT 07 Rancho C.,caaon9a, Ca 9:130 NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RESULTS IN YOUR SECURITY INTEREST 11 THE PROPERTY I(COMING SUBJECT TO AND LOVER THAN THE LIEN OF SOME OTM F0. OR LATE MORTIFY A SECURITY INSTRUMENT THIS AGREEMENT, Made this iy o1 D7N F [Alit Iwo tr owner a the an erein +i ter de a CA of a here r er rilerr*a to as 'Owner' and the City of holden [uusonge hereinafter referred to as 'City', owner and Holder of the certain Rea] property and lion Agreement hereinafter refer ad to as 'Lien Agreement', WITNESSCTH THAT WHEREAS, 'Cfly of Rancho c.... tmprorenent and Ma lntaann Agremwent dated cow er is g; Sea Attached legal Description - 'Exhibit A' to secure 'Chun' Rancho Cucamon a Improvement and Maint(OM A Channel) Parcel Map which was records ac r for Pe'E*pG of said Coun y; an in the t1 WHEREAS, owner has executed a dead of trust and note In the scam of S3,Ia0,DD0 date A nor er ra errs o u 'tender r erelna /ter and toneltlOhs described ptAeH lny which deed d! tra t Its terms recorded concu.r.ltly herewith; and WHEREAS, It Is A condition precedent to sating Said loan that said dead of trust left above dentfoned shall uncondltonally De and remtln at all times a :tan or charge Upon the land heralnbefore described, prior and superior to the Ilan or charge cf tha Lien Agreement; and WHEREAS, lender is willing to Elko Said Ion provided the deed of trust Securing the same If a lien -or charge upon the above described property prior to superior to the lien or charge of the Lion Agreement and provided that City will specifically and unconditionally subordinate the lien or charga of the f e Lion Agretatnt to the lien or charge of the deed of tru to Lender; and It avor of WHEREAS, Modify Is the loam to Owner; and Cit. itrtiet hereto that dead o1 trust s4uH ng the sue shalt tonttitwte al ills' or charge U sold land which IS unconditionally prior to superior to the llrn or charge on the Non Agreement NOV. THEREFORE in tonSlde,atlon of the mutual benefits accurtng to the p:^tlas hosts and other valuable cmntiderAtion, the aConow lodged, Andl in�order to Induce tenderuato sMOdlfy a tho v loan above referred to, It it hereby UtClned, understood and agreed as Sol laws; III That said died of trust securing said note In fa..r of to +der end any renewalS or ezten%lons tear a of, shall unconottl ono lly be and remain n all dascriDfd Orfornan0 su, ;Ie,.c h[hsrllen lc rscA ergs of the llu Agreement F` - S19 fF) That Lender .,old not ease Its loan Above described without this subordination aTreenent (0) Thee this agreement shall be Ins whote and only / agreement with regard to the s10ordnatlon of the Ilea or charge of the LIAR Agreement to the Ile, or charge of the deed of trust In favor of Lender above referred to and %hall sup rsede and ncel, Dut only insofar as would &fleet the prcaiority bebcah the dead of trust and L en Agreement any Prior agreements as to such Subordination including, but not II•nited to, those provision$, I any, contained 11 the Lien egree ... t rhl,h Provide for the &pbordlnatio, 0, the Ilea or charge thereof to another deed or dead% of trust C r to another sortgage or Mortgage, The City declares. !greet and acknowledges the (a) He cacsentt to and OPprovet all pro, slant of the note and dead a/ Iruft in far or of ender eDOVa referred IO by that nevi& l•. eodlf teat t,a lg rtes Ant sited and be been Owner and Leader, (h) relfea ishes ne sa eo Cl Uncondit onallyor.&IV ge -s%' Of the L1en Agra, subordinates In favor of the lien or charge upon $ato land of the deed of trltt In hear of Lendtr above referr thisthat ed to and understands In reliance upon, and In consideration of s ralrer, rallhao lshment eat to oar dfeatlon Sp eel fa loans and advance& are being And .11 be .a 0e and as a part and parcel thereof, specific .0"etary and other obligations are being and will be entered Into which would not be each or entered late but for Sold reliance upon %Alt ralrer, rellnbulihetnt and subordination; end (c) An endorsement has DeM3 placed upon the lAn his Ia- 'rueent been Subordinated gto etAt •Ifeatdr ca ergs of the deed of trust in fsvor of Loader eaove re /er -ed to. NOTICE; TMI$ SUBORDINATION AGPEEMEAT CChTAINS A PROVISION WHICH OBTAIN AIILOAN,R SAN PORTION •OF YNICM MAYA BE EAPENOETY fast pUAPOSES SECURITY 10 "Ali OTHER T IMPROVEMENT OF THE LAMB M ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIEEO t .� SP Rtcordlnq nguested by: City or Rancho Cuuton9e Whin recoroem mil to: City of danaho Cucamonga R.O. Roe 80I SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91170 NOTICE: THIS SUROROINATIOM AGREEMENT RESULTS In YOUR SECURITY INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BECCMIMG SUBJECT TO AN0 LONER PRIORITY THAN THE LIEN OF SOME OTHER OR LATER SECURITY IHSIRUHEMT. THIS AGREEMENT, •ode "IS day of ,19 by Kanter and Footh l 11 props- , ovpor o t e an nerafni7Cef 'as cr a An here .alter re .rfed to at 'Owner• and the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereinafter referred to as •City's owner and H older of the certain Real property and Lien Agreement Hereinafter referred to IS 'Lien Agreement• WITMESSETH THAT WNEREAS, n@41 Prpptrtr toprovement Contract and Lien ATnesnt• dated —covering: er r Sae Attachel Le.11 - 'Exhibit At to secure • ne 4n A alt• rhlcc��, w�as ncor to Dec eme.r 9. Iggl o the c 1 RaCOrBY of sale County; w� — ' WHEREAS. owner has encuted a deed of trust and note In the sum of 57,103.000.00 mdee In favor met Hltfu hl wf p • M • re Otte m if an er , payable Y n an upom the terms ate tend l times described therein, which deed of trust Is to be recorded concurrently herewith; and WHEREAS, it is a condition precedent to mating said loan thtt Sold deed of trust last abort mentioned shall uncondltonally be and remain at all times a lien or charge upon the land herelabefore detcrl'td, prior and superior to the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement; and WHEREAS, Lender it willing to make said loan provided the deed of trust securing the same Is a lien or charge upon the above described property prior to superior to the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement ono provided that City will specifically and men Wneltlm tally submrdlnate the lien or charge of the Lien ore scant to the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Linder; and WHEREAS, it is the mutual benefit of the parties hereto that Lender modify said loan to Owner; and City Is willing that the deed of trust securing the same Shall constitute a lien or charge upon sold lane which Is unconditionally prior to superior to the lien or charge on the Lima Agreement NOV. THEREFORE, In consideration of the mutual benefits aCOYring to the parties hereto and OSHA, valuable consideration, the receipt And sufficiency of which consideration If hereby acknowledged. and In order to induce Lender to modify the loan above referred to, It is hereby declared, understood and agreed as follows: (1) That said deed of trust securing said note In favor of Lender and any renewals or aatentions thereof, shall unconditionally be and remain at all times a ,fen or charge on the property therein described prior And superior to the Ilan or Charge • of the Lien Agreement. i 40 (Z) That tender would not mate Its loan #bare described without this lubordloatlon agreement (T) That this agreement shall be the whole and only agreement with regard to the tubardnatlon of the lien or charge of the Lion Agreement to the lien or C S arge of the deed of trust In favor of tender aoore referred to and shall supersede and Centel, but only Insofar As would affect the priority between the dead of trust and Lien Agreement any prior agreements as to such subardlnatlan Including, but not limited to, those provisions. If any, contained in the Lien Agreement which provide for the subord lnation of the lien or Charge thereof to another deed or deeds of trust or to another mortgage or mortgages The City declares, agrees and actnowl_dges that: (a) He consents to and Approves all provisions of the note and deed of trust In far or of Lander above referred to by that certain modification agreement by and between Owner and Lender, dated 1113 - He IntenttOMally and unconditionally war e#, >3_ ref inqutshef and subordinates the lien or char;; of the Lien Agreement In favor of the lien or charge upon said Ian] of the deed of trust In fa Tor of Lander above referred to and understands that In reliance upon, and in consideration of this walver, relinquishment and subordination specific loans and adranClf are being and will be made and at a part and parcel thereof, specific monetary and other obligations are being and will be entered Into which would not be made or entered Into but for sold reliance upon this wirer, relinquishment and subordination; and (c) An endorsement has been plared upon the lien Agreement that said Lien Agreemant has by this Instrument been subordinated to the lien or charge Of the deed of trust to favor of Lender above referred to NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT CONTAINS A PROVISION WHICH ALLOWS THE PERSON OBLIGATED ON TOUR REAL PROPERTY SECURITY TO OBTAIN A LOAN. A PORTION OF WHICH MAY BE EAPE117D FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN IMPR".YEMENT OF THE LAND. A CITY CLn-f- ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED i = 'EXHIBIT A° LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 8100 as recorded to Book 85, Pages 5 and 6, Official Records of San Berpardine County, California r '.s RESOLUTION NO EGL -G;UR 8 L ' 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONA, APP CITY COUNCIL OF SUBORDINATION E AGREEMENT FROM r KANTER AND FOOTHILL PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lie., Agreement for the installation of off -site improvements and a Maintenance Av,lement for an open channel along Foothill Boulevard, was approved by Lfty Council on December 2, 1983, and recorded in San Bernardino County on December 29, 1983, Instrument Nos. 83- 306628 d 29; and WHEREAS, far the developer to secure financing for the project, the lender requires that the above - mentioned lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordinate Agreement to that effect for the City's approval and execution. NOW, TFEREFRE, ibdT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of.T Rarcho approvedifandiathehaMayordisbherebye uthorriizedbtoan e sign said -s Subordination Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. AUthelet, y er 0 e rey ng, or CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Mav 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd O Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Slane rrandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PAVEMENT TESTING FOR VARIOUS LOCAL STREETS As part of our Local Street Preventative Maintenance Program, It Is desired to perform structural testin for several local streets to determine the extent n€ needed pavement repairs aliverlay thicknesses The streets to be examined =3 shall be Lion Street north of San Bernardino Road, Montara Avenue north of San Bernardino Road, Tryon Street between Amethyst and Archibald Avenue, and finally Klusman and Leuclte Avenues north of Tryon Avenue and Selma Avenue north of Montara It Is proposed to add these to the current pavement evaluations being performed by Norris Repke 6 Associates for local street rehabilitation The testings are proposed for a not to exceed fee of $2,000.00 to be paid for from Gas -tax funds account Number 11- 4631-8104 RECOMMENDATION Approval of Contract Change Order 1 to Morris-Repke for r, 0 85-119 In the amount of $2,000 00 for Pavement Evaluations for Lions, Montara, Selma, Leuclte and Klusman Res cl45b ted, ot"Uml Att achments a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER L;ONTRACI FOR Engineering Evaluations and Constriction Plans for the Rehabilitation of Certain Cary Streets. C 0. 85 -119 a e: TO: Norris- Repke, Inc., 507 E. First St., Suite A. Tustin, Cali'urnia 92680 ng neer You are hereby requested to comply wich the following changes from the agreement for engineering services Conduct Pavement condttion evaluation and in Contract Price In Contract Price prepare recommendations for Rehabilitation efforts for the following streets: Lion, San Bernardino Road to Hemlock Street Montara, San Bernardino Road to Harvard Tryon, Amethyst to Archibald �%l =c, Leucite, Tryon north to end of curde sac Klusman, Tryon north to et.1 of cul de sa: Total not to exceed $2,000.00 Selma, Montara north to end of cut de say; TOTAL aw ura�wuun _- These streets outside of the original sbidy area exhibit extreme deteriorations needing rehabilitation. The P S. d E will be done by others but without scientific evaluation of structural integrity of the pavements. floadrater testing currently being provided by Norris Repke on another project is recomnended. The amount of the Contract will be (Decreased) (Increased) by the sum of: Two thousand and no/ 100---------------- -- ----- - - - - -- Dollars ($2.000.00 —)— The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: Thirty -seven thousand four hundred fifty and no /100--------- - - - - -- Dollars ($37,4 The Contract period provided for completion will be (Increased)(Decreased) (Unchanged) 30 (thirty) Days This document will become a supylement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Requested: ,1 'yd u//// s, y ng%neel -- r a te Accepted: 6&,4 ng neer a Approved: Mayor, City ut Rancho Cucamonga Date ibis n orr on use as • ord of any ; ngec to the originai Mg neer ng agresent dated: Itovember 21, 19th CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 1, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd 0. Hubbs, City Engineer BY. Blane Frandsen, Sr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: HEAMOSA AVENUE NIDENING b HAMILTON STREET EXTENSION Title investigations for acquiring the necessary right -of -way along the east side of Hermosa Avenue have discovered an approximate 66 foot strip of unclaimed property between the existing roadway and the east side properties. The strip separates the park site from the street, and must be crossed by the Hamilton Street extension and covers the area needed to widen the Hermosa pavements and the needed area for the relocation of the power and telephone utilities. As best can be determined, the strip of ground was rreated by survey deviations between the section line falling within Hermosa Avenue and the centerline of the street proper. These original surveys were conducted in the late 1890's. Subsequent surveys have respected these surveys leaving the 66' °no man's land" between the street and the properties to the east. Ticor Title, who is conducting the title research for the project workings is directing the preparation of a parcel map to extend the City's right -of -way for the street and the front property lines for the adjoining properties to cover or *write over • the unclaimed property. This appears consistent with actions performed for recent developments to the south o1 the park site. The change order in the amount of $11,894.00 includes $3,322 for additional research and surveys and designs performed to date and and $8,572.00 for the preparation and processing of the proposed parcel map. It is to be noted that the cost of the parce. ,,- preparation is offset by not having to purchase or otherwise acquire this portion of right -of- way needed to widen Hermosa Avenue. Additional expenditures by the Ticor Title Company to guarantee the map and anticipated. Right- of-way eforgthe Hamiltonrstreet frontages and west side frontages for the Hermosa Street widening are proceeding under the existing design contract separate from these extra workings. ac CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Hermosa Avenue Widening and Hamilton Street Extension May 7, 1986 Page 2 RECOMMEMOATION Aoproval by Counc',l of Contract Change Order No. 2 to L. A. Hainscott and Associates In the amount of $11,894.00. This brings a new contract total for C.O. 85 -122 signed December 5, 1985 of $33,744. The project designs and ultimate construction are funded from the Systems Development Fund AResyectfully submit s eer LBH:LB:nas Attachments 67 7191 I, M t Al wA:NSOOTT Pr JO+w Ww is ELtWT D S..Aw April 4, 1986 L A WAINSCOTT & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVILENCINEERS LANDSURVE(ORS ARGUTECIS C016tRUCNON MATERIALS CONSULTANTS Blaine Frandsen, Senior Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department P 0 Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 LARRY VESGY AM ROwPior CJAgmCLPa R CLLES PE wow 282 24F Re Design of Improvements for Hermosa Avenue and (City P.O. 03355) Dear Blaine: Per your request, we are suV ting our proposal to provide a Parcel Map in conjunction with the subject design The cost for this work, which Is an increase in the original scope, is $8572.00 A breakdown of our Proposed budget increase is as follows: 1) Tentative Map $2500 00 2) Parcel Map $3000.00 3) Field Survey $3072.00 TOTAL 85 With your authorization we will increase the upper limit of this account (City P.0 03355) by $8572 00 to an upper limit of $33,744 00 This revised upper limit was derived as follows: 1) Current Authorized Amount $21,850.00 2 Additional R/W work per LAW letter dated 3/28/86 $ 3,322 00 3) Parcel Map per this letter 5 8 572 00 TOTAL 33,74 00 Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, NSCOTT S ASSOCIATES, INC. DZ ,".'6. Z 9:7 a Pd Rus Sharp Manager Public Work., Engineering L'IrY OF RANCRO CUCAMOdr.A RS:cp ENGINEERING DiViS10t1 22400BAATON ROAD SUT000 GBANDTEBRACE CALIFORNIASM4 17141624 -IRS W7EWL3cFFA:r In NI ChPOANAVE SLOTEM G OTERRACE CAlYpiwAEJ]N 014iE lm CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA u1au9e-irar ENGINEERING SERVICES CONIRACT CHANGE ORDER COfITRACT FOR OES IDN OF IHPAOVEHENrS FOR HERMOSA r er No.: 2 AVEIIUE AND MANILTON STREET Date: 4 -9- TO: L H IIAINSCOTT 6 ASSOCIATES, INC . 22400 BARTON RO., SUITE 200, DRANO TERRACE, CA Egtneer You are hereby requested to comply with the following chances from the agreement for engineering services. - I. Additional Right of way Investigations per letter dated 3/28/86 2 Parcel Map Preparations per letter 4/4/86 ly in Contract Price TOTAL In Contract Price $3.322 10 $8,5)2 00 $11,894.00 7r- $11,894.o0 U A N AdditiCnal survey a title workings required to clear "right of way" for street widening. Survey's performed In late 1890's to estahlish orl ginal street left a 66' wide unclaimed strip e Map. ground along the east side c Hirmosa which be cleared by preparation of Pa rcCl The amount of the Contract will be (00cMte# (Increased) by the sum of: Eleven Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety Four 9011irs (S 11.894.00 --'•�- The Contract To cal including this and previous Change C-de•s will be, Three Thousand Seven Hundred Fourty Four D011trs S � �— (7 _00 The Contract period provided for completion will be (Incretsed)(Oecrea • ed) (Unchanged) Days This document will become a s element to the Contract and hereto. Requested: ty ng neer Accepted: _ � fa�7 - % engineer Approved: all provisions will apply —¢ —� /— ate e 4--lE —o,(. Date ayrr�, tty o anc o ucamonga bat e ihis Informa on wt a us as recor o agreeett dat an gma engineering CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7. 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd S. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Plane H. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Change Order 85 -067, Project No. 800 -84 -29 Lemon Avenue from Archibald to Hermosa A " N 1977 Please find attached Contract Change Order No. 1 for the subject project and contract. The additional change order covers costs fc- additional survey and design required to complete the project plans, specifications and estimate. `—V The change order amount is within the original 10% contingency provided by Council for this p.-ojett on July 5, 1985. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the Contract Change Order No. 1 for Project No. 800- 84 -26, Lemon Avenue from Archibald to Hermosa to G.P.S. Consulting Civil Engineers in the amount of $1,160.00 bringing the Local contract amount to $35,360.00. Such workings are being funded from Gas Tax Account 11- 4637 -8107 (C.O. 85 -067). Respectfully subaltted, LBH F:bc Attachments 70 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER OtiTRACT FOR Order No.: 1• CO 8-j•067 Pr'Ject No. 800 -84 -86 Lemmn Avai,r Date: 04- 6 -85 from Archlbaldto Hermosa TO: Cor.s- mina Civ11 En tneers Eng neer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. See Attached Letter S t RE 1 1 E 1 N WE In Contract Price In Contract Price I. Additional Survey to Coordinate CCHD facilities $600.00 2. Design Revisions for new curbaeignments '= at Lemon /Archibald Intersection $560.00 TOTAL $1,160.00 JUSTi CA ti See attached letter. Note the extra wurkings remain within the contingency amount originally approved for this project. The amount of the Contract will be 1D4fit`fiAW) (Increased) by the sum of: One Thousand One Hundred Sixty Dollars ($ 1.160.00 ��- The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: Thirt Five Thousand Tliree Hundred Sixty Dollars ($ 35.3�O.00r�' The Contract period provided for completion will be 11dfiPfiAdfiA),(Dfifii'fiDAfiAJ (Unchanged) Days This document will become a sup lement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. L D. IuCbs, City F g neer 7"' Date Accepted: 1 % � Eng nee�� ` Date Approved r Mayor. City of Rancho Cucamonga Date This Inforomtiou will be used as record o any c nges to t e original engineering agreement dated: July S. 1985 ^(1 ce� D consulting civil engineers Mr. Blane Frandsen Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Division Coac-unity Development Departuwnt P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 17821 E. 17th. street suite 295 Tustin, California 92680 (714) 832 -4707 April 7, 1986 Rnterence: Project ho 800 -84 -26 Lemon Avenue from Archibald to Hermosa Bear Blane: This is our fee for providing additional services beyond the original scope of work. �y s, 1. City changed curb alignment at the intersection of Archibald and Lemon. 2. Survey to provide top of Cucamonga County Water District facility at the Alta Loma Channel, including stand -by. 3. Cucamonga County Water District provided the wrong location for their facility at the Alta Loma Channel. City provided survey to locate second time. 4. Additional survey to locate improvements at London, constricted after start of this project. Tutal ldditional fee: Surveyino Design 14 hrs 6$40 /hr. Should you have any questions, please call me. _ Sincerely, . �jyl(�G Iorman Y.. Spiel n Cxacuti•ve Vice Pre ent likS:lkb 7� 3 600.00 560.00 $1,160.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Hay 7, 1986 U 19" TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer SnBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dxdication between Ermal E. Osborne and Kathryn B. Osborne and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 6295 Archibald Avenue The attached subject agreement between the City and Hr. and Mrs. Osborne provides for street improvements which include curbs, gutters, sidewalk and drive approach on thNDaborne's property fronting Lemon and Archibald Avenues. The Osbornes ve agreed to grant to the City a Roadway Easement to allow for the widening and improvement of the intersection at Lemon and Archibald Avenues in return for the construction of said improvements. Said street improvements will be constructed in conjunction with the City's Capital Improvement Project for the reconstrul.tion of Lawn Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Ermal and Kathryn Osborne and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully submitted a L8h:LEH:bc Attachments 773 AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 1986 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY') and Ermal E. Osborne and Cathryn B. Osborne, husband and wife, as joint tenants (hereinafter referred to as 00MIER') for the installatioe of certain public improvements including, but Tj not limited to curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks and street pavements along a portion of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A. Recitals (i) CITY has prepared plans and specifications for, and presently contemplates the installation of, public improvements along Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and along Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street (the 'Lemon - Archibald Project' hereinafter in this Agreement). (ti) OWNER owns that certain real property, identifiae as San Bernardino County Assessors Parcel No. 201 - 251 -20, fronting along both Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue, which pr, erty is within the limits of the Lemon - Archibald Project. (iii) OWNER desires to participate in the Lemon - Archibald Project so as to dedicate necessary rights -of -way related to street frontage improvements along its property at Lemon Avenue and Archibald Avenue ('the Osborne Portion' 7 S_ hereinafter). CITY is willing to include the Osborne Portion within the _ Lemon-Archibald Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. it is agreed by and between CITY and OWNER as follows: HOW THEREFORE, a of Easement in favor I. OANE.4 sd related Durp sesd r in form and content identical to that of right -ot way attached hereto as Exhibit 'A'• 2 CITY is authorized to cause OWNER's Deed of Easement to be recorded forthwith upon execution of this Agreeftent. public 7. CITY shall include the Osborne Portion as apart of the construction of the Lemon - Archibald Project and shall cause all y,s plans and in accordance with CITY s D improvements to be installa�'� specifications therefor. its elected officials, officers, 4 OWNER agrees to grant to CITY. agents, employees and contractors such rights of b Y CITY s enCity Engineer to construction easements as are deemed Pnoece nary f the Osborne cause the completion o hall be governed by and construed in accordance with S. This Agreement s le al Oroceeding is the laws of the State of California. instituted to enforce any term or 5, In the event any g arty in said legal proceeding pr ovision of this Agreement, nd costs from the other D nt, the prevailing D arty in shalt be entitled to recover attorneys fees an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 7, This Agreement is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, wherever the context requires or admits, successors or assigns. %S� 8. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, %hether oral• or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have ezecutsd this Agreement on the day and year first above written. 7� Ty- CITY PROPLRTY OWNER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ermal E. Osborne CALIFORNIA, a mun.cipal Kathryn B. Osborne corporation Jeffrey King. Mayor ATTEST: APPR 'ED AS TO FORK: Beverly A. Authetet City Attorney City Clerk 7� ftt�tftA tt*tlrtttttMtlrf }RIRHtttkfHf efH RttRM tfflrtNt{� tRtftt4fftttttltff MN4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ss On ,19 before me the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared 11 D. MIKELS and BEVERLY A. AUTHELET personally known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed it. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. Isle STATE OF CALIFORNIA COU Ss NTY OF SAN BERN /PADINO On thly the !n ay, me, ' 1 ' 17cn Proved to me on the bast the person(s) whosle name cnuwleged that S MY HAHJLAND Notary Signature N befort evidence cribed to the within instrument NOTE: UXEN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP, THE ABOVE ACKNNT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION /PARTNERSHIP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS 7�7 -t 4. RESOLUTION NO. COS== VT -BLit 8G -/ I S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM ERMAL AND KATHRYN OSBORNE ANC AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish requirements for construction of frontage improvements in conjunction With the Lemon Avenue Reconstruction Project. WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach and pavement located at 6295 Archibald Avenue, to be made part of the Lemon Avenue Reconstruction Project. WHEREAS, Ermal and Kathryn Osborne ha•,e agreed to dedicate Right -of- Way as reimbursement to the City for said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BEFIT RESOLVED by the :ity Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of May, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Aut a et, ty erk Jeffrey K ng, ayor 79 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, rity Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Paul F. McMichael and Cheryl A. McMichael and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 6309 Archibald Avenue The attached subject agreement between the City and Mr. and Mrs. McMichael provides forayreet improvements which include curbs, gutters, 1p sidewalk and drive apP'Foach on the McMichael's property fronting Lemon end Archibald Avenues. The McMichaels have agreed to gran to the City a Roadway Easement to alloy for the widening and improvement of the intersection at Lemon and Archibald Avenues in return for the construction of said improvements. Said street improvements will be constructed In conjunction with the City's Capital Improvement Project for the reconstruction of Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue. RECOMMENDAT104: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution apProving the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Paul and Cheryl McMichael and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully submit ed, C LBH:LEH:bc Attachments F401 AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 1986 b, and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY•) and Paul F. Me Michael and Cheryl A. Me Michael, husband and wife, as Joint tenants (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER") for the installation of certain public improvements including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks and street ?s- pavements along a portion o Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A. Recitals (i) CITY has prepared plans and specifications for, and presently contemplates the installation of, public improvements along Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and along Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street (the 'Lemon- Archiblad Project' hereinafter in this Agreement). (ii) OWNER owns that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 201- 257 -01, fronting along both Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue, which property is within the limits of the Lemon - Archibald Project. (iii) OWNER desires to participate in the Lemon- Archibald Project so as to dedicate necessary rights -of -way related to street frontage improvements along its property at Lemon Avenue and Archibald Avenue ( "the Re Michael Portion• hereinafter) CITY is wilting to include the Me Michael Portion within the Leman- Archibald Project upon the te-ms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and OWNER as follows: 1 OWNER shall execute a Deed of Easement in favor of CITY for street right -of -way and related purposes in form and content identical to that attached hereto as Exhibit •A•. 2. CITY is authorized to cause OWhER's Deed of Easement to be recorded forthwith upon execution of this Agreement. 3. CITY shall include*c Me Michael Portion as a part of the -ry, construction of the Lemon - Archibald Project and shall cause all necessary public improvements to be installed in accordance with CITY's plans and specifications therefor. , 4. OWNER agrees to grant to CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees and contractors such rights of entry and /or temporary construction easements as are deemed necessary by CITY's City Engineer to cause the completion of the Me Michael Portion. S. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 6. In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in i an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 7. This Agreement is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, -2- successors or assigns, wherever the context requires or admits. 8. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whether oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowled3es that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. 11V =au CITY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By: Jaffray King, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk PROPERTY O%MER Paul F. Mc Michael Cheryl A. Mc Michael 6/ r V -3- 83 i City Attorney fMttttitf NRif Nfltf• .R1ttltfN Rf YRR1R tRNN•NfN NRR RRtltNRNtN RYRfRttH STATE OF CALIFORNIA ))� COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO is On me 19 .before —. the un ers gne otary u c . persona y appeare a an L AUTNELET personally known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the persons whe exec'.uted the within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation, and acknooledged to me that such municipal corporation executed it. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. Notary SignafUre STATE OF CALIFORNIA lie COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD140 ss sµ In t Lis the A day, of �pr Q8G before the n ers gne C, o ar Pub c persona y app�earee perso ally ;nown to me �f�- -� c�atL- proved to me on the basis of satisfactory e. 'ence to be the person(s) whose name(s) Arm subscr ed to the within instrment and acknowieged that _4y,�CtV,� execute t. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFTC1'AL MAL. :JAN"41,CEMC I:RrftXX0S EAL UmK VJJWmany ,�RRr I). Imp Notary gna'1 ur s -e NOTE: WHEN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERS NIP, THE ABC A IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION /PARTNERSHIP ACXIa0WLE0GEMENT IS -4- 8 141 eaooaoaso uouaarmn Clt7 of Raodm N-udiaae enmr ascowroauyro - My O" Po. CMarooap P.O. Ras Raahe Caamaa". a, G 911]0 eracenoraTba aura aacoaoun ou __ EASEMENT MR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, roodpt of which IS hrssby aeka.kdaad, X"I F No MlUael and Cheryl A. Mc Michael .1 DRAM th. CW of R—M C...S.. a MuakL -w Cap, 11M eo EASEMENT ten street and related puryotn . , la, Oar bd Otoa that certain red property In the G7 of Raaho COsmsoo , Camyof.San Bmhiodiao, Statect CAWwWa. Dearad L Fobs That portion of Lot 12, also L„oni as Lot E, of the Foothill Frtrit Cospan , Tract Mo. la the City of Rancho Cucason9a. a part of the South 112 of the South L/ of Section and the South 112 of South"st L/a of Seaton 25 1n TomshlP I N:rth, Am 7 Vest as PLt recorded In Rat 20, page 11 of Naps, In the Office of the County Recorder of Bernardino Comty, State of California, described a Iollon: _ Beg n"'"g it the Rarthnst caner of said Lot 12; thence alongy the horth line of said I 12, 15 feet to the NortMUt tOrnr of said Lot E, said Awl A lint also being the Sa 11N of limn Arm" SO feet wJoe as shorn M laid Plat; Vence Southerly alga the Ei line of said Lot E a fast; thence Wnterll, along a line parallel with and B fr Southerly, nasured at right 4n91n to said North 11". 77.21 feet to the Mgimlog of tanyn,t curse concise to the Southeast hexing a radius of 20 feet. eh.e.. -.- e,M ...._. .__.. - -__ - P, E, sale West line also being Uie Ent line OfonArchiO d Are. 61 - Southerly along said parallel 11th 72.21 feet to Ua South 11th of '• ` Westerly along said Seeth lift 17 feet to the Soutiwbst corner of Northnly along said Mast line JOB feet to the point of tealmM_ EshlDft A Is attached hereto mJ Suds part hereto' y Is of me Dood nRNR11At .tCI W OwrLRDpMRNT urea ,Pppee t.Fato�w jjjj' an.w�eara Lp7orvt tRfL.b.a.m4 Cm"a&AtgRGA9LduGO_)u W vbanpwd Maw! r�Cac.araw r npearaa �nL S 0^, CE1`t�tl1L_Ne RimSne L. an C NN��as�� NrleOawV O'balr O'I.oM b.n Mpnluaa WAbftn Maq t 1-.- qwe .J%i4re1 bbNeMnM +irbsa b.vtn t' � eebrM .! awea,awYnWw.anfean^.. y}g,d R�r r� C'i� R1tNCle SnaeaanaemcW aaaa . .,raewdl ,- RESOLUTION NO. -E07*OT-M 8% — I I (p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODUCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM PAUL F. AND CHERYL A. MCNICHAEL AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAVE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish requirements for construction of frontage improvements in conjunction with the Lemon Avenue Reconstmictlon Project. WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach and pavement located at 6309 Archibald Avenue, to be made part of the Lemon Avenue Reconstruction Project. WHEREAS, Paul F. and Cheryl A. McMichael have to dedicate Right -of- Way as reimbursement to the City for said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, D_*4T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City P' Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement, authorizes the Hayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this Sth day of May, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Bever A. Aut a et, City Clerk Jeffrey MT. yor M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Laura Psomas, Landscape Designer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF INTENTION TO FOR14 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, FOR THE CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY. LOCATED BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF BANYAN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH AND BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF ROCHESTER AND MILLIKEN AVENUES ON THE EAST AND WEST BEINS DEVELOPED BY THE MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND KAUFMAN AND BROAD DEVELOPMENT GROUP AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 4, 1986 Attached are the Rxsolutl ns and Engineer's Report for the formation of a sr landscape maintenance district for Phase One of Caryn Planned Community, located at the northeast corner of Highland and Milliken Avenues. Phase One consists of Tract Nos. 12642, 12935, 12937, 12940, 12941, and 12942. Future tracts will be annexed to the district at•the time of recordation of each tract. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Reso ut ans nitlating and forming Landscape Maintenance Uistrict No. b, give preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report and set the date of pu "lic hearing for June 4, 1986. es fully submt ted, Attachments RESOLUTION NO. E66 8? p(. " 11 % A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, Part 2 of Division 15 (cottencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets & Highways Code authorizes this City Council to initiate proceeoings for the formation of an assessment district to improve and maintain parkway and open space landscaping located therein; and WHEREAS, this City Council desires to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to be known as *Landscape Maintenance District No. 6• to improve and maintain parkway and open space landscaping located within the boundaries of said landscape maintenance district. NCI. THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resole as follows:, ±x SECTION 1: This City Council hereby proposes the formation of an assessment tr ct to be know as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 6' pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 2: The nature, location and extent of the improvements to be installed -a ntained within "Landscape and Maintenance District No. 6' are more particularly described in Exhibit •A` attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: The location and extent of Landscape District No. 6 is more par cu ar y described in Exhibit •B' attached hereto and incorporated herein, and this City Council hereby specifies the designation `landscape Maintenance District No. 6' for said landscape maintenance district. SECTION 4: The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to caase the Preparation and filing of a report with respect to the formation of Landscape Maintenance District In accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the Califoroia Streets and Highways Code. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, ^•. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jeffrey King, Mayor RESOLUTION 110.'Mr-WT/R Ro — /) 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE AND t11INTEMANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) dHEREAS, on May 7, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directrd the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act rf 1972; and NFiEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to s•'+ Act, which report has bce-i presented to this Council for consideration WHEREAS, said City Council has duly conslderea sa16 report and each and every part thereof, and4 finds that each and every part of said report is Tss- sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be moaified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o sa o work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr a in sa4d report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upo:s the subdivision of land In said ssA essment District to proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the Incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for--t-Fe purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. • I RESOLUTION No. E95 9i+r}9R pip "1 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (CARYN PLANNED COHMUNITY), PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, on May 7, 1986, this City Council adopted Resolution No. * proposing the formation of an assessment district to be known as 'Landscape Naintenace District No. 60 for the purpose of maintaining certain landscape Improvements to be located within said assessment district; and WHEREAS, on May 7, 1986, this City Council preliminarily approved an Engineer's Report with respect to said *Landscape Maintenance District No. 60 and caused said Engineer's Report to be filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, this City Council desires to form Landscape Maintenaue District No. 6 for the ma!Oenance of certain landscape improvements to be y-,a located herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby declares its lntentlon to order the formal on a an assessment district to be knovn as 'Landscape Maintenance District No. 60 for the purpose of maintaining certain landscape improvements therein and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 2: The landscape improvements to be maintained within the boundarleso Tandscape Maintenance District No. 6 are more particularly described on Exhibit •A' attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: The general location of Landscape Maintenance District No. is more part cularly described on the diagram attached at 'Exhibit 8" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 1: Reference Is hereby made to the Engine, Report on file with the CTt—Y-ZTerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for o full detailed description of the boundaries of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and of land within said assessment district. PA RESOLUTION NO. EOS -07 -19R Page 2 SECTION 5: This City Council hereby sets the date, time and plane of a public eaT ig on the formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 to be as follows: DATE: June 4, 1986 TIME: 7:30 p.m. PLACE: City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line Road. City of Rancho Cucamonga SECTION 6: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorizeT—a-R--directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be published at least once, ten (10) days before the date set for said public hearing in The Daily Report. a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of'-Nn ar o an c rculated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City Clerk is also authorized ano directed to cause a Notice of Public Nearing to be sent by first class mail to thrse persons whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized rpty assessment roll or the State Board of :r Equalization Assessment role with respect to the real property to be included in Landscape Maintenance District No. 6. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES. NOES: ABSENT: Jeffrey ng, ayor ATTEST: Beverly Aut a et, y er California, CITY heCforegoinghResolutt of n washduly Passed. approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City cf Rancho Cucammonga,at a of regular (special. adjournedl meeting of said City Council held on the * day Executed this * day of *, 19** at .xncho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. AuE9eTe-t-,-ZTt-y-ZTe—rF �/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Street and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION This report deals with the establishment of a Landscape Maintenance District for Tentative Tract 12842 and Parcel Map 8817. The District will include all of the numbered and lettered lots within both thL Tentative Tract Map and the Parcel Map. Areas included within the work program are the trees and ground cover within lettered lots dedicated to the City, trees and ground cover within the dedicated streets to the City, except ground cover on local streets (those street :t which lots face), trees and ground coverts within landscape easem7ats dedicated to the City and other areas required by the Specific Plans or by the City Council, or as dedicated by the various subdivisions. These areas listed above will become part of the active work program, at such time as the specific areas are dedicated to the City. Annual Engineer's reports will be prepared and approved by the City Council defining the specific work programs for each year and the estimated cost for those years. As the development proceeds within the District, the area to be maintained by the District will increase and so will the cost, however, the number of units will also increase. It is hoped that the number of unite would increase at approximately the same rate as the maintenance area would increase; thereby, keeping constant or decreasiva the cost per unit, excluding cost of living Increases. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, then the areas landscaped by the developer, than after a period of maintenance by the developer, the acceptance of maintenance by the Maintenance District. There will be a lag time from the original dedication until the District actually begins the coat of maintaining property. It is intended that the area within Tentative Tract 12843, adjacent to Tentative Tract 12842, m.y annex to this District and the landscaped areas dedicated to the City, within Tentative Tract 12843, would become part of the active work program of the District. -1- I�- SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (SCOPE OF WORK) The plans and specifications and installation for all landscaping will be completed by the developers at their cost for the individual to be subdivision and be Development ])apartment. Maintenance Activities eca ma ateoanee ac_ ...... District include: The repair, romovnrovidinglformthe life. growthy health and part Of any improvement, p beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying. fertilizing or treating for disease or injUry: the removal of trimmings, rubbish. repair and debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems, and to tthe o remval of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent cultivated areas. on the areas to be maintained by the SECTION 4. ESTIl1ATED C09TS No costs will babe ipcurred—b9 the District for original improvemenfA construction. Eased on data from other cities, and fr)m the City of Rancho Cucamonga for landecaping maintenance District to 1 and from a review of proposed landscaping Plans, it hased upon current the maintenance cost for assessment pure e maintained and estimated number of dollars. estimated areas to completed dwelling units will bean follows: Complete District The estimated cost t current dollars) for the District upon completion of all areas within Tentative Tract 12942 is shown below: Equestrian Trail - 18,900 s -f. Parkways, Slopes Greenbelts 382,200 s.f. Q 0.25 Trees - 050 Q $5.00 TOTAL ANNUAL YAINTE2iANCE COST -2- q'3 Q 0.05 - $ 945 . $ 95,550 . $_L. 700 • $101,195 SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed boundary map and legal description of tS Assessment District are attached to thin report and labeled "Exhibit A" and Exhibit B ". precise lot in the referenced tract maps and dimensions are included Assessor's records. SECTION G. ASSESSMENTS Maintenance costs for he entire specific benefit to district are found to he of all property with the fell owing relations: within the District in accordance Land Use Assessment Units s ent a we ng nneit 1 Unit Vacant Land 1/4 Unit /Acre Commercial /Church 2 Units /Acre (Privateachool ) i iyf h Cstimated Assessments Estimated Planned Comtiunity Complete: Total Annual Cost (Section 4) - $101,195 Assessment Units Summary Land Use Units Assessment Assessment Units /Unit Units Dwelling Units 470 D.0 1 470 Vacant Land -0- 1/4 Unit /Ac. Ccm=erclal /Church 7.9 An. 2 Units /AC. 15.8 (Private School) V.+ TOTAL ASSESSMENT UNITS 485.8 Assessment $ate - 101,195 208.31 MT8- Effective Assessmentr Dwelling Units - 208.31 per year - 17.38 per month Other Developed Land Ones - $418.82 per acre per year $34.72 per acre per month Estimated assessments are for comparison only. Actual assessment will be set by public hearing each year in June and will be based on actual maintenance expenses a -d developed land use summaries. F-45-- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE. 61AINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. IRU YJiMiLM a TRACT 12642 �O CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,\IOXGA �'. ENGINEERING DIVISIOa`I 9 vl .1 ITY 41,�P N page ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. I \� \ \\ GN " WEE M1WFNAKE TALE MiM mcc rxi' CITY OF RANCHO CUCt%A %10 \l ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP 97 ern TRACT 12642 A rxi' sy I, 1 ASSESSMENT D IAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. 1 el, { x Sig 1. r no TN" """" "'"" TRACT 12935 T.CF MAO"N"M title" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A :mom All - t/' -rim ctj 3 ENGINEERING DIVISION T� VICINITY MAP (7'9 lv un W�. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCA�r- MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 ANNEXATION NO. 1 \tea \ \\ 0M 10 YID SPCC "WENAKE "Et WWI mmm CITY OF RANCHO CUCA\10: ENGINEERING DIVISION 6�$ VICINITY NIAP un TRACT 12535 tile; A A "ExHIBIT N page ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 6 ANNEXATION NO. I ��>�� CMOf =C AND iPCC YUNTCN�NCC ��� TALL YAWKNLN4 TRACT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA F1, X ENGINEERING DiVISIQN 61 d: mI > VICINITY NIAP laO 1 2937 I title; J "EXHIBIT 11, Da$ i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 ANNEXATION NO. 1 �M —Y� °• ,.. ry•'7 trot J. . 9 •r= C+^'+. -Y 9N�t J +J � +Tl1e., ter.• PA ��(A � . / • ,y, m `rte` ftGte. ♦ /I�Jy� ;Jfj y ��/ ASS'= �r'a$ 'n jj'S 17 L "` • "• ���f to"'W% ew,cf arm met WYNT...we ' TAee Ewa TRACT 12937 oS f== ti CITY OF RANCHO CIIC:,AlO \GA title; - -- "E><f1181T A" x ' ENGINEERING DIVISION j' VICINITY 1.1,.P (D� N —_ i Page 1 I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 ANNEXATION N0. I (TRACT 29]) 47 MS_ __ •2 }T. � • � q1 u � 4 � V i� I/• I N 7y � •ate- •.r [I RD.AWDU RC_. wt `�." `"` MME W�NT[NARC` "TRACT 12940 )Ili[ WIRTLRYlCC �Ctc Nye CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t _ f ENGINEERING DIVISION EI b j> VICINM �IAP n �O161Q N n ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM IANJSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. I Gm wo TN(( NMWENAKE To" VNWK m CITY OF RANCHO C(.CA \IONGr\ ENGINEERING DIVISION }" Y "to" '> VICINITY AtAP /� TRACT 12940 z N tit I!; Page ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE WINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. I G mq O net vllnit"AKE TRACT net U,Y TCWUQ 1294( �s 6n f> CITY OF RANCHO CUCA�IO \CA r. titl• ENGINEERING DIVISION �/ VICINITY NIAP D '— nacc ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE • MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. I "EE MUMN"a TRACT 12941 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION €L f> VICINITY NIAP ��5 N v2sC X31 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. 1 �`�7� OJCILIp lNp TpL[ YCINTCYIYCL TALL YVMLYUl2 TRACT 12942 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO \CA A _• �_ �S bn 't ENGINEERING DIVISION ' VICINITY MAP 10,6 N P26e ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. I s� pry '`•�, ►���. Oq]11q eNe T[E 4YMT[NaNC[ TRACT 12942 TIIGL NYNiLYWQ c %�~•� CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA sicic; €1 �3 ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY AIAP /0 7 N ,-,Z;7 1 EXHIBIT •60 Tract No. 12642 as recorded in Book 96, Pages 82 -85 Tract No. 12935 as recorded In Book 96, Pages 82 -85 Tract No. 12937 as recorded In Book 96, Pages 82 -85 Tract No. 12940 as recorded In Book 96, Pages 82,83 Tract No. 12941 as recorded In Book 96, Pages 82 -85 Tract No. 12942 as recorded In Book 96, Pages 82-85 Official records of San Bernardino County, State of California /09 !v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF HAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13117 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, SOUTH OF CHAFFEY COLLEGE, SUBMITTED BY PARAGON HOMES, INCORPORATED Tract 13117 was approved by the Planning Commission on June 12, 1985, for the division of 60.5 a:res into 302 lots in the Low Medium Development District located on the east side of igYen Avenue, south of Chaffey College. The Developer, Paragon Homes, Incorporated, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $615,000.00 Labor and Material Band: 5308,000.00 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. &R.s have also baen approved by the City Attorney. RECOMENDATION It is recommended that the City Cuuncil adopt the attached resolution then Mayor Tract Ct City Clerk to SdId areementn and security i caused said authorizing record. Resp tfully u tted, / Hf :ko At achments 16 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION 116 PROJECT: TITLE: EXHIBIT2 TTY ImprovAgmt CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, to conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and PAMccN Hma:s Iwc. hereinafter referre Co Y the eveTr. WITNF,SSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City as shown on the conditionally approved subdivision known as TRACT NO. 13117 ; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally loefted :Y on the east side of Haven Avenue Y� South of chaffev colleee NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer s expense all improvements described on Page 7 here- of within twelve months from the effective date hereof. Z. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said tpproval unless an exten- sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Developer may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof. SULK request shall be submitted to the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement security, and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall ha•,e the right at any time to cause said provisions t: be met by any lawful 1448 15th Street Santa MooLca, CA 90404 J/// means, and thereupon recover from the 0evelope and /or his surety the full cost and expense incurred. _ S. The Developer shall provide metered water service to each lot of said development in accordance with the regulations, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Water District. 6. The Developer shall be responsible for reptdcemant, relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with construction of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 7. Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by and on file in the office of the City Engineer. Said improvements are tabulated an the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated on page 7 hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by number. The Developer shall also be responsible for construc- tion of any transitions or other incidental work beyond the tract boundaries as neoded for safety and proper surface drainage. Errors or ommi is ions .dj scovered during constructin shall be corrected upon the dirion of the City Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 8. Construction permits shall be obtaine4 by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisarce to the area, and to proper notification of pdblic utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with this section shal' be subject to the penaltie- provided therefor. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to said development. 10. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 11 Said Developer shall at all times fallowing dedica- tion of the streets and easements in said subidivision, up to the completion and acceptance of said work or improvement by said City Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defe..ti -e or dangerous conditions. -2- Until the completion of all Improvements, herein incorporated on. Page 7 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as improvements shall be under the charge of said Developer. Said Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained In a temporary street closure permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to protect the Public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made. 12. Parkway trees required to be planted shall be Planted by the Developer after other improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed. Planting shalt be done as provided by Ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community Development Director. The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all trees Planted in good health until the end mai of the guaranteed )at e r. ntenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is 13. The Developer is responsible for meeting all condi- tions established by W City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City Ordiances, and this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance of all Improvements constructed thereunder until the improvement is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no improvement security provided hereinwith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City. 14. This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreement together with the required improvement security has been submitted to the city by a or Council same has hbeenn accepted an and y this olagreeme t rand Cthe improvement security therefor has been released. 15. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer with this agreement shall c7nsist of the following and shall be in a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure fe!:.ful perftrmance of this agreement. 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvement Security instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies. B. To secure laLorers and materlalmen: 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 65499.2. -3- //3 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorneyi 3. A deposit with city of money or negotable " bonds of the kind approved for securing A cash deposit with the City to guarantee Payment by the Developer to then e ngi e or survey whose certificate appears up. r P for setting of all bovndary, lot corner, and street centerline me uments and for 7urnishing centerline tie notes to 'he City. The amount of the deposit may be any ao.nt certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, if no value is submitted, the cash bond shall be s shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained herein. Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as proce- dure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment in full from the engineer or surveyor. The reglrit:Ad bonds and the principal amounts thereof art set forth on page 6 of this agreement. A 16. The Developer warrants that the improvements described in this agreement shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship. Any and all portions of the improve- ments found 'a be defective within one (1) year follbwing the repairedworchreplaced rbye Developer ace freet of by h charges to shall he City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a sum equai to ten percent (10X) of the construction estimate or $200.00, whichever is greater, to secure the faithful performance of Developer's obligations as described in this para- graph. T1:e maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do specified work with respet` to any parkway maintenance Assessment district. Once the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other improvement security described in this authorizedm by btheelSubdivisiondMap that Act such and anyeaappllicable otherwise City Ordinance. 17. That the Developer shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him and an, contractor or subcontractor perform ng work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature o+ the work or from operationi under this agreement, whet'ier such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by said person!, even though such damages be not caused .a- by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The public liability and property damage insurance shall list the City as-- additonal insured and directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued hereunaer shall so state. The minimum amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: A. Cry tractor -s liability insurance providing bodily tnjury or death liabi'ity limits of not less than 1500,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liabil- ity limits of not less than 5250,000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of 1500,000 for claims •hich may arise from the opera- tions of the Developer in the performance of the work herein providec. B. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the performance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits of not less than 1500,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property T_f damage liMlity limits of not less than 1250,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than 1500,000 which may arise from the operations of the Developer r- his Contractor in performing the work provided 'or herein. 18. That before the execution of t'iis agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the specified insurance. Each such certificate shall bear an endorsement precluding the cancellations, or reduction in coverage of any P, )icy evidences by such certificate, before the expiration of ,hirty (30) days after the City shalt have received notification by registered mail from the insurance carrier. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to comply with same, the Subdivider has submitted the following described improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: -5- 116- FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Letter of Credit Principal Amount: $615,000 First Nationwide Savings Name and address of surety: 9800 South Sepulveda Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90045 Type: Letter of Credit MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT arincipal Amount: $309,000 Name and address of surety: First Nationwide Savings 9800 South Sepulveda Blvd. Les Angeles. CA 90045 CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type: Cash Name and address of surety: Principal Amount: $5,600 MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: N/A Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposdte their signatures, Date a/aR /PR b „rt /.�A�f/ /inert"!.// ,Developer gnature r me Date ���4 \— b��. �j --C \ ,Developer -- �ignacure Orion Ca al rinte de Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Approved: .� e �r,[ity Attorney DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED AND COMPLETED IN T TRIPLICATE Y� lepro,mat: u[n•• v' CITY OF RAm310 COCNVrA r ENgIREERIIIG DIVISION EILROADIKERt PERMIT FEE SCIIECULE NOTE: Dect• not Include current In for writing Ptnit W P"Iteent deposits wANTITT UNIT ITT" PRICE AAODNl '+ mod_ L.F. P.C.C. cure - 12• C.F. ia• Rutter 7.25 9.119 LJ P.C.C. cure . 61 C.F 24• gutter 6.00 +f. In. ---- L.F. P,C.C. cure onIF S.SO �1'lL L.P A.C. ben 4,50 •. �aLSCS S.F. _1A.1:11 S.F. a• P.C.C. sidewalk Orin uprmatlt 1.73 2.50 m.mn SJ P P.C.C. cress gutter (Inc. curb) 7.40 •0,500 IAA, C.T. Street tuevatlm 1.50 14".2 R(y_ C.T. Iaoorlto ne"kast"t IulWN le gn41q 1.30 232 laO, 1.1 S.F. premaratim OF subgrade 0.15 21.0• 190_.L0 F. Crushed ag9. One low Inch thlct) S. 0.01 27.ws _I-UL TOM A.C. (O[er 1700 tans) 27.00 �A/L TON A.C. 1900 to 1700 tons) 15.00 1. 751 JLLA. TON A.C. to 900 tons) 45.00 _ .alt. - T0A 111$00 A.C. unWr SOD tons) . 60.00 - �s2y„ P. 1rr S.F. A.C. Z• thlct) Path A.[. (trench) 0.53 1.75 - ZL.01t S.F. 1' thick A.C. m[h OF O.0 .•p �2� EA. EA. Ad7ut serer a4mote to g:•ade 250.00 +o.em0 fop Jl" EA. Ad7ut sewer Clem but to grade Allots Isom J/L water ealns to grade 7a,OO EA. L.F. Street 110'1 bur lad., (lnteriec. SSW eln) low 00 1.00 •m,pM �1. L.F. 2 A 4• redwood he 1.75 _ faun - .•7 -yUL S.F. L.P. RMIAI of A.C. oansanl Raeveal of P.C.C. cure 0.13 7,00 919 fig, L.F. Rego &I of A.C. env 1`0 n• EA. Street sign 2W OD EL ReflUton and puts 15.00 s.fto L.F. S.F. COpaete black wall lut.11l le 6naue 25,00 Retaining w411 lulY.a as tradtee ta.00 ___e/A_ Tut Aggregate but 7.00 •� C.T. L.F. Cencrate structures 16• der (zWO 0 425.00 --ya- L.F. 241 RCP 1500 0� 29.00 73.00 �,SIL L.F. mil L.F. 261 RCP }}2000 0 46• RCP {IZ00 11 49.00 ._ •- •n_ EA. Catch basis 4 - 41 76.00 W ••sw --S/A- EA. EA. Catch basin g 1 61 .l. _ LA. Catch basin V 1 22• Local depntslon 4+ g000.W .r• EA. local depression 1Z' SW,00 7000,00 --.UL EA. Junction structure "A_ EA. whet ttmture• St1 PSO6 'W 1SW.W -• I_ EA. --SIA_ EA. Outlet structure, Std ES07 ward posts 300.00 T_ --SL` L.P. ward panel (wood) 40.0 -S.00 L.P. EA. 3.wt headwati I ring) 7.00 x•00 _ -Lion L.F. RtMod head 1.75 •- u R11 S.F. L.F. lmdsapin9y L Irrigation .. Nott curb IP,C.C.) 2.IS Il•.a•1 Ion U. Atnat Trea. 700 71.00 jy�7r -• INGIREERING INSPECTION FEE ,FjD OO 3110 TOTAi, 10.EETORIITIOVOEIIAIRIE)0.5 CA91 S+._rea OEpOSIT •o,1n CONTINGENCY COSTS- 11nn IC11 SLC"T ( FAITIOOL PERFORMANCE HOtaPORtATIOII SI[StT ICASNI c- o ERIAL E � I1WS . �S .o LAWR AM tbfTER111 6pfp (SpS) ln1 RM NOR em lranumt ton Cite of 0.anchp Cucuonga )Imlclpal Code. Title 1, Chaptn• 1.00, adapting Sam Oenudlro CamtP Condo Tlel .,, Ch,tera 1.% a ask nstoraHon be Nude Prior to Issuance of m Engineerlag /lallroatton dapeslc shall Cmstructlm Cersit. Reviled 3/94 7 //7 AmnuBOnd SUBDIVISION GUARDNTEE NO PERFORKMCE (SETTING OF FINAL MONUMENTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Califurnia 91730 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the final map cf Traer No. 17117 are to be set and furnished by the subdivider's engineer or surveyor on or a ore March 19, 1988 as specified in the Engineer's or Surveyor's Cert sate and agrees t rnlsh the notes thereon to complete all engineering requirements specified in Section 66497, of the Government Code. The undersigned hands you herewith the sum of S 5.600.00 (Receipt No. as a cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee that the monuments will —Fe set and the notes furnished as above provided on or before the date specified and that the engineer or surveyor will be paid by the undersigned. It is further understood and agreed that in the event the undersigned fails to complete the above requi remenftil thin the time specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to complete said requirements or cause them to be completed and the cost thereof is to be a charge against said cash deposit, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to make the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund. It 1s further agreed that if the undersigned does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and if the engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed in Section 66497 of the Government Code, the City shall pay to said engineer or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made. If the cost of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference within thirty (30) days after receiving written statement from the City of Rancho Cucamonga specifying the amount of the difference between the cash deposit and the actual cost of said requirements. Cordielly, Subdivider- Address Santa Monica. Ca 90'06 Date 2.z:aw\5j4, The depositer of record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit) shall be Ca 90406 NLme ress NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED IN TRIPLICATE 3/17/86 //9 RESOLUTION NO. eft ff—t" �EG — ! a D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APFROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, , MPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 13117 IIHEREAS, h lots, submitted by Paragon at c Hoomes.I Incorporated. Subdivider, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of Chaffey College, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1 fcIloED by the City Councii of the City of Yu Rancho Cucamonga, California, as s fcilows: I That said Improvement Agreement be and the same Is approved and the Mayor Is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is, authorized to attest thereto. and 2 That said Improvement Sea.rity is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same he approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, lg *. AYES: NOES: ABSENT e rey ng, tyor // 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineer Techician SUBJECT: APPROVAL Or PARCEL MAP 9530 LOCATED OM THE NORTH SIDE OF SIXTH STREET, EAST AND LEST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE. SUBMITTED BY W. KEITH WALKER Parcel Map 9530 was approved by the Planning Coatnission on January 22, 1986, for the division of 7.7 acres of land into 2 parcels in the Industrial Specific Plan Development Dis'gFltt located on the north side of Sixth Street, east and west of Rochester Avenue. Improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit Issuance. RECOMMENDATION It is rec.+mended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 9530 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Attachments VIET RESOLUTION N0. EDS VFM &P — )ci A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9530 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9530) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9530, submitted by M. Keith Walker and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the north side of Sixth Street, east and wes• of Rochester Avenue, being a division of a portion of Lot 36 of Rochester as per Platt recorded in Book 9 of Maps, Page 20, Records of San Bernardino County, State of California, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ari WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 9530 is tre final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map: and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BED RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of ?u Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 9530 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jef f rey n9, ayor ATTEST: ever y t e et, ty Uer I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of sa'J City Council held on the * day of *, 19**. Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. A-ithe et, City C erk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TR. 13065 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET, EAST OF AMETHYST, SUBMITTED BY HILL WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT Tract 13066 was approved by the Planning Commission on November 13, 1985, for District located n the sso#hnside ofil9th Street, Le as et ofidAmethystDevelopnrenI, The Developer, Hill Williams Development, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $306,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $153,000.00 Letters of trictsoand Cucamonga County Water District. C.0 6R s haveealssonbeen approved by the City Attorney. RECOMIEROATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 13065, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. Resp tfullybm ;ed IBM: :ko Attachments /a3 J , I W 7 O W to �CEET r o � A a , • 1 i l: W Q SITE I 5 z VICINITY MAP xr Y�4 M11 3 i, CITY OF PROJECT: 13066 i4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: VICINITY MAP ' ENGINEERING DIVISION r, EXHIBIT; rrarr . ±_ A) 51 CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TA iWA %NOV •tt HER IT THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement Is made and entered into, 1e ConfCnante with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of toe State of California. and cf the Applicable Ordinan0e% of the City of Manche Cucamonga, California, a municipal cow pOre[1 Cit On, by and between said City. hefefnafttr referred t0 as the y. and NI11 mat )liana tMr,ler Te VWlYper nevi lnii to erree to as inn WITRESSETM: THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain very property In sala Cis Dr at %barn 0e the conditionally appre••ea fobdl Iel0a known as TR I1066 . And WXEREAS, said City has e%t+Dlished certain regmiremests to be met Dl seia OevaloDer as pf ere quid to to +pOrauI of $old so {t.vv,lIslon 9enera111 looted en Ne fwtn side o1 Bth Street east!a of Ame[l;/St ROM, THEREFORE, it It hereby agreed by said City and by said Doweleper as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to nnstruct at Oeve lopery eepense all Improvements described an page 6 here- of vltkle tvrive wont he from the effective datphereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the data of the rasotutien of the Council of said City aPpruv:ng this agreement This agreement shall be in delaeit en the day follow. 1ng the first aeeivdrlary date o/ told approval unless an eaten. ad. on of lima has been greeted by sold Cl ty ' hereinafter provid- conplate flit tuns hereof. request re0uestn shalln be submitted to too City In rrltt,g not less Lean Sb days before the expiration date hereof, mad Shall contain a statement of cfreumstaaces no Instituting the eat ms tan of time. The City Shall have the right to review the provisions of this agrvemant. Including the Stet traction standards, cost eftiman. ae0 Impravemant fetaritl. and to require adjustments th ere le 1f col sulstaatlal change has Decurrtd during the term hereof. to the Provisions rOf this Develo agreement. the City neglects shalt torsomplyr with It ANY AWS tint to recover fro i t0e OuHoper acd %a his surety tie hl! cost and upon•• in co ,red S. The Developer shall Provide metered vats, service to each lot of 1414 development In accordance Nth thuf aliens, iehedmlat. and feat of tee Cucamonga County Water 00 e re rqlot. relocation, The removalo Developer aShall d lComponent of lane irrigation orate; system in conflict with aoastrecCOn of required improvements to toe satisfaction of the City Eeglaeer &Ad the owner of such rater system. -1- MI11 Williams Development Company 5500 E. SUta AN Cagan Rua Suite 211 AntAelm, CA 92607 /\S Tracts and COWInd. P.M. T Improvements tenfOrm to the Standard Dv+ the City. and to the Inp.o.0 tn@ effiCe of the City E.91ne an the Cont traction and Sa., p sill 6 hereof. as taken free 0y number The Developer she sloe o1 any transitions or et O aye d.riet as needed for s Errors or amwissions disco Corrected upon the direction doe to said plan modification of tmH a9reament and Secured Dlaeaed worts Ired to be constructed shall and Standard Specifications of plan approved by and on file In Sold Improvements are :abolated limale, hereby Incorporated an ImprOvement plant listed thereon Ito be responsible for constrvt- Incldental wort beyond the tract sad proper Syria c@ Oralnage during constructln shalt b@ he City Cnglaaer R@visad work ill be Covered al the provisions the surety coloring the original 6. Construttten permits shell be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prier to start of rare; all regulations listed thereon %ha 11 be otserv@d, with attention given to Safety procedure, control or dust. Wolfe, or of he- nylaaoCe to the area. and l0 Draper nOMICatica of public tltl MISS and City Departments failure to Comp 1) with t� secli�tball be [abject to the penalties plodded the, %for. }- 9. The Deveiepar shall be responsible far reaoval of all Toes@ rocks and other dear;% from public rights- of -ra,1 within or adjoining sold development resulting from wore relative to sa Id development le. Vert done "thin cabling streets shall be d1119ently partied to completion; the City sbail half the r'ght to complete Soy and all were In the event of unjosslfled delay In completion, and to recover all cost and atom@ Incurred from the DR.. leper and /er his contractor Dy amy InfyI means 11 Said OeveloOar shall at all times fa1S0wing dedlCa- tlon of the street% and easements to said subididelon, up to the completion and acceptance of Said wart or ImPtcveumt by said CItS Coyndl, 9Ne goad and ad @mute warnln9 to the tr nellap Cab Ic Of Sich aed Sealy diOgefOul coadltlon @alftan[ In sold strut or easement. and will protect the tran11n9 Public from Such defect Ne or dangerous Conditions. Omtil the completion of all Improvements, herein incorporated an ►age 6 , to be Performed, each of said straits not accepted as Improvements Shall be under the charge of said Developer Said Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contalnud In A temporary street closure permit. Issued by the City Engineer. whenever It Is necessary to protect the public during the construction of the Improvements herein agreed to be made. 12 Partway trees required to be planted Beall be Planted by the Developer after other ImprOeemeet work, gr,dleg and cleanup has been eampletee Planting shell be don: as prodded by ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community Development Director. The Developer shall be responsible for malntaining all trees Planted in 9004 health until the end of the guaranteed maintuance period, or for one year after planting, wh/CAI -er Is later. 11. Tke Developer Is responsible for massing all Caedl. tions sstabllshed by the City pursuant to the Subdivision -2- /,=� I &ad no Improvement Security provided herasawlth shall be released before such acceptaect unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City. 14 This agreement shall not terminate until the aalntenance gwaraetae security hereinafter described has been released by toe City, or until a new agreement together Wits the required Improvement security has been submitted to the City by a attestor to the herein aimed, and by rnolutlon Of the City Council same has beta adopted, and this agreement and the Improvement security the rafor has been released IS. The Imare.ammat security to be furnished by the Duel Doer with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be in a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 1. A bond or bonds by one or mare duly authorized Corporate sureties is •,a form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.1. Z. An Improvement Security Instrument in the fare and Content specified by the City Attorney. 7 A deposit with the City of money or negoWable bonds of the time approved for seterin9 deposits of public monies B To secure laborers and materlaimen: I A bend or bonds by one of are dolt' authorized Corporate sureties In the farm and content specified by Government Cade Section 66499 2. 2 An Improvement Security attromen. In the farm and Content specified by the City Attorney. 1. A deposit milk City Of sane) Or negotiable C. A cash deposit with the City to gmarantai payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose Certificate appears Upon tae fla al Nap for the Sett /nq Of all boundary. lot corner. and street centar Ina monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City. The "Cost of the deposit ley be any 40emat certified by the tngln,er or surveyor as acceptable payment is fall; or. 1f no value is submitted, the Cash bond shall be as thorn on the Construction and Bond Estiutt Contained total". Said Cash deposit may be refunded as soon as grace. dure permits after receipt by the City of the c aterline tfe notes and written assurance of payment In TO 11 tram the engineer er surveyor. D. The required bends and the principal &Mounts thereof are set forth on p398 6 of this agreement. 16. The Developer warrants that the feprovemeats described In this agreement shall be free from defects In mater•als and workmanship Any and all portions of tell Improve. maaas found to be defective uithln and (1) year fallowing the data on which the Improvements See accepted by the City than be rope avid or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the The Developer shall furnish A 84lntr1,8uce guarantee saurity to a so, equal to ton percent (101) of the construction est taste or $200.00` whichever Is roar, to I..... the faithful performance of Dw, oper's ab lfgat one as described to this pars. 9qr 10. The malateeance guarantee security shall also %,curs the faithful parlor ... ce 0 the Developer of any obligation of the 0 ..las., to o `Dec /led wort With respect to any parkway ' r eat sate er 2)60 00, w4ltAover Is yrest u, to secure the faithful Ovlo n an<• of Oeveaeper�s abllgallGAS as described 10 this Sara. Irish. The maintenance g,af,ntee security shall also stare the althfwl Performance by the Ontloote of say obligation of the OeatlOper to do 'Pacified w.,k with respect to day parkway ualateneatt assessment district. Once the toprovemeats beta bets acceptti and a ulntenasce guarantee security has been acctpted by the City, toe other larraytmt,t ilc,rity described In this agretatat may be released Provided that sock relent Is otherwise authorlitd bi the Sutdlrisle, Map Act and any applicable City Ordinance 17. That the Developer 'hall late out and maintain such lub He liability and property dwge insurance at Shall protect his and any Contractor or subcontractor Performing work covered by thlf agreement from cities for property dent as wklck may arise baeaue of the Paters of the work or from operations art0u this agreteamt, whether loch operation{ be by himself or by env contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or l,dircctly RmSloyed by said persons. e,,a thowgh uCS damages be not Cawed Y two negligence of the Developer or any epatracty or atractor or anyone amPloied by sale person. The 7lelllc l lity and property dasape Intannce shall Ilse eke Cfcy a{ adiltomai tawnd and directly protect the city, Its offlcars, agents and esploiees. as well as the Developer. hit contractors e and his subcontractors, In, all Insurance Policies Issued hereunder 'hall so state The tniwun atoantt of icA Insurance shall be as follows: A. Contractor's liability Insurance, provfdlny bad Ily 165ury or death liability limits of net less the 5700,000 for each person and 51,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property I•,ag• tlabtl. Ity limits of out lest than 5100,000 for each acci. dent or occurrence with am aggregate limit of YS0.000 for elalat which may it lee from the Opera. tlon0 of the 0e1e100ar In the performance of the work herein provided, b. Avt,moblte liability Insurance covering all vehicles used to the performance of this agreement Rrovlding bodily IsJury liability limit% of not est than 52009000 for each pert,, a,I SIDO.000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability Ilmlt$ of met lets then SS0,000 for each accieau or occurrence, with an aggregate of not team than $100,000 which may arts, r,a the opera. ttons of the Developer a, his Contractor 1w parior,ing the wart Provided for herein ] Developer m all that before e execution s the filt with the City certificate of Insurance or certificate, covering the specified Ispurance Bach certificate suck shall bear an endorsement preclodlnt the rancelletlar by such or reduction In coverage of any policy ehda,ce' •ate, cu. a t'r the Cl before the eaptvticm Of thirty 1301 days IS . -ill bare received notification by mall from the r,glsteuA Insarshte carrier. As eHdence of uAdarstsnding the Provisions contained herein, and of Intent to ;amply with samq the Subdivider has submitted the follOwing described improyament securltl. and ham affixed his wt a lose to'. b- vtox FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Tyre: Principal Amount: 5006,OOD.00 Rime and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PATMEAT Typal Principal Amount: SIS3.000.00 NASA And address Of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MORUMERTATION Type: Principal Amount: NASA and address or surety: 52.550.00 MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: N/A Name _And address of surety: s �/ s TO N[ POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE AT THE CITY IN VITAE$$ HEREOF, the parties hereto hero CAUled these presmntt to be duly meet, tea .s0 actnovl<dped rich all formalities reNuired hr aY Of tie dates let Forth slRnatur/fs. opposite 'heir Date .71, �SG Dy �� �4�Q 4ture Darelcpmr C!pANLd "ZV4,mf Lirt r Atea Date by pnatur— � ---- -- a �_,Oeralpper r me Accepted: Cis: of Reecho Cucamonga, Cll.(A rhea A RunfCIP41 Corporation By: Mayor Attest: .ETELOPER•S SIGNATURE MUST RE NOTARIZED -S• ' -Wytst call Or RAR09 Cucnvm • (MIREERIIIG OITISIM EACRMCJIIEIII PLAMIT FEE SCIIEOIAE for lepn +arnt: Tntt aL- iit0•n,IEI. nn n-, Date- 1 -7196 3 74 , - -CIt7 Flla 4e City D ng Orarinq o. _lniotr lalou FOIE: OHS cut Include current (n for writing pernit cr pareeebt deposits 00Affrm twIT ITT" P2ICE AYOt nT L.F I.C.C. curb - 12• C.f 24• gutter 7.25 +nes L.F. P.C.C. curb - e+ C.F 24• gutter n.v0 L". P.C.C. curb only 3.50 -- l.f A.C. bar. 4.50 ar.+n SJ 4+ I.C.C. sidewalk _ I.7S n n+a _ S.F Orlin APPnem 2 60 n ern S.F d' I.C.C. cruse gutter (Inc. web) J.40 C.T. Street eacantlm 1.50 C.T, leported wbankeent 1.50 pyS79- $./. preparatim of subgra0e 0.15 r00a7 1fo.000 S.f. Crushed an. base ((Per Inch thick) 0.JS 4MQ L7es TOR A.C. m 71,30 ntg 27:T ,34.855 TOR A.C. end to 35.00 s��iOR A.C. SO) to 900 toss) 45.13! _ i 7 Tpl A.C. umr Soo toe,) W.10 S.F. A.C. Jw thick) 0.!s -- S.f. Patel, A.C. ltrenml 1.75 S.F I• in .a A.C. over IF 0.:0 [A. Adjust fewer "aNpole to Pride 250.19 LA. Adjust sorer clean Out to grade 150.(9 -_ [A. Adjust Patric rains to grade 75.00 ------ 4 EA. Street llgbt5 11000 30 uu _a L.F Nrcicadca (Intersec $500 In) 11.00 1660 L./ 2 a 4• redveW Mader I.Is S.F Raaoral of A.C. pannenl 0.25 ru- R.F. Renoeel of P.C.C. 2.20 X70 L.I. RmOral of A.C. bers,, 1.00 EM Street signs 200.00 EA. ."DS Lot Orlin 125 00 PTO L.F. Concrete block will 2S 00 -� S.F Retaining wall 20.00 -� TOM Aggregate Oise 7100 C.T. Crnceete structures 425.07 45.675 ` L.F. IS. PCs 2070 0 MOD +tee ---.LL- L.F. 24• RCI 1500 0 2!.02 .inn L.F. 26• RCP :700 0 41.00 �I! L.F. 48• RCP I2M II Truss aY ]li s [A. Catch basin R e 41 2020.00 FA, 156th basin Brooks fall. 400.0 erg EA. Catch basin " - 22' 4500.00 _ V. Local depnnlm 4' 500.00 ,rood �I -�• EA. Local depression li' 1000.00 ' [M ,Wctlm Structure 5000.00 r50eo t EA. Yadnle ISM.W sea [A. C. COW( 50.00 410 erg. � EM L.F Cle.nout ' 4•Inr Flux Onto 40.00 +00 15.00 n.rta 5 ee Ld49 EA. i:Auall l4R• wing) 40M.W -.lpAP t.f Redwood Mader +.'> ( i.38 S.F. lmdseaploqq L Irrigatim 2.79 -Jpyigy L.F. Roil curb (P.C.C.) 1.!0 2 OIGIMIATI1 IASP1C110t FEE I2.865.00 Still TOTN, r apES"AtllaffmcAlm CASH fAIT11IGLlICTCOSTS _ 1p9t ¢ MhKIA IA)f0M LAtASM 4 TTE 2.SSO.00 A10 MTFR =0 ((9.1%) 11ARAC0TATIOR SJRETT �CApI) ' 5 'fbrfse.l to Clly, of Pa ch, CKa.4+ QCIP+i Code. TWO 1. Chapter 1.00. adpetay 5a g� �lw Cpmty, Cede Titles. C4+9ters I.S. a cash mtratia /dcllmatlm deposit still 'n .j ry Rpo.W! for to IssP:bcp of an Lcglnecrinq Cmtmctlm Permit. SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE NO PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL MONUMEMTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P 0 Boa 907 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91770 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 9, Section 66197 of the Government CO de, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shorn On the final map of To 1MI are to be set and furnished b/ [ e su 0 vi ers engineer or surveyor on or before a spec lf'ed In the En9lnamr y or urrsy or s ere ute Am agrees to furnish the notes tremor to com Dlete •il engineering requirements specified In Section 66197, of the Colorneeat Code The unJtrsl99ned hands you herewith the sum of f _7.9W.00 as 6 cash deDO Si A. said dep0'It t0 guarantee t aL t t mpnwmmn f will be set and the notes furnished as above provided on, or bP a the date specified and that the engineer or surveyorlAll b paid by the undersigned It is further understood and agreed that In the event the undersigned fail& to complete the above requireNtnts within the time Specified, the City Of Rancho CUCAMOA94 is authorized to complete avid requirements or cause them to be completed and the Cost thereof is t0 be a charge against s Id cash dAmt &It, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga it authorized to 'It, tie necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund. It Is further agreed that If the undersigned does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the set.ing Of the final monuments, and if the 0n9/neer Or surveyor gives the notices Prescribed in Section 66197 of tha Government Coda, the City shall pay to said CAg Inner or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made. If the cost of completing sold requirements exceeds the amount of the Cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference within thirty (30) day[ after receiving written statement from AN City of Rancho CYC2mon9e specifying tie Amount Of the dif /erence between the Cash deposit and the actual cost of said requl• cents. C .. Jelly, / �,/y IN Subdivider 0o E. truirm a/h- /r uAas/ 7Po Al // Address .41111te, 0,4, 9a.E/e Date 91 1ln The depositer Of record (for return of any portion of the gash deposit) shall be amt rem NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED RESOLUTION N0. E -IIT - 8c,- Ias OF RANCHO CUCCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITY APPROVING IMPROVEMENTY AGREEMENT. IMPROVMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 13066 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract of 27 Rancho submitted by Hill Williams Development, City Of ofc19th Street, eat ofv d rthand approved as be by ideCity aseprovided In nnthe Subdivision map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the 28 of said Lity requirements of Ordinance City*, prerequisite to WHEREAS, to meet the requirements esteblished as P said approval of AgreementlsMap Lted herewithcfor aaPProvaliv and re ecutioneby the of said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement r pub ty, and submits for delineated said Final Map offering for dedication far public use the streets the City of NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifornia,°c,follaws: ��. he swe is 1. That approveddan 'he7Mayor isr authorized ato execute a e is F said on beha authorized to attest thereto; and he City 2. andtsufficieennt. subject to approval casp 9 to form and content thereof by the City Attorney: and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map Clerk is authorizedg t a�aexecutept the �certificat itthereon nn and the behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19*• AYES: NOES: ABSENT: e rey ng. ayor 1J a CITY OF RANCHO CQCAMONC.A STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 - 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd % Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -24, LOCATED CN THE NORTH SIDE OF TRADEMARK, WEST OF HAVEN SUBMITTED BY RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUSINESS PARK Development Review 85 -24 was approved by the Planning Commission on December 10, 1985. �c� 1y The Developer, Rancho Cuxnga Business Park, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $11,000.00 Labor and Material Bond S 5.500.00 RECOMMENDATION It is recoimended that the City :ouncil adopt the attached resolution approving D.R. 85 -24, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. V su itt Attachments 133 AAPD N uw✓ vIcIN /TY AfAP ��A r/O/V Vo SCALE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: vumirt ENGINEERING DIVISION /3 EXHIBIT; 'mss. CI'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IVPROYEMENT AGREEMENT FOR DR 05 -24 KNOW ALL MEN BY TH'SE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformarce with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulatiois of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by ai- between said City and The Lusk Company hereinafter referred to as the Developer THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain h rral property in said ty located on the north side of Trademark west of Haven; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval, and WHEREAS, tht -11. �x'ecution of this agreement and posting of improvement security is hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval NOW. THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and,between the City and the Developer as follotis; 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all Improvements described on page 4 hereof within 12 months from the date hereof. e This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten- sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Developer may request additional time to which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and Including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In considera- tion of such requbst, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. The Lusk Company 17550 Gillette Avenue Irvine, California 92713 / 3S 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any law- ful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and exfense incurred in so doing. 5. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Devel- oper from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right -of -way, and the developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the regulations contained therein. Ron - compliance may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penaltiet provided. 6. Puolic right -of -way improvement work required shall be constructed in conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or ommissions discovered during construc- tion shall be corCgc�ed upon the direction of the City. Engineer. Revised wow due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 7. Rork done within existing streets shall be diligent- ly pursued to completion; the City shall have thq right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay In completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocations, or removal of any component of ar.y irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject L the approval of the City Attorney. The prin- cipal amount of said improvement security shall ­t be less than the amount shown: /3J� FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type Principal Amount: $11,000 Home and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR Type Principal Amount: $ 5,500 Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type: Principal Amount N/A Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CIT; IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused thesg presents to be duly'Y�v£cuted and acknowledge with all formalities required by law on the dates set fo ^th opposite their signatures. Date Rancho Cucamonga Business Park, April 8. 1986 a Limited Partnerahlp Bti•• ThR L sk .Company, a California Corporation, Managing . %gent gy i ; — 4 Q /1 // ``KO to t�Qf Date pY oper ,( I / / ��_, Devel 4 igna ure E r rin e Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, C•itfornla A Municipal Corporation By: Mayor Attest: Y er Approved o, P� cLhnayr y orney DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURES MUST DE NOTARIZED AND COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE •- /37 EnyESt CITY OF RMLIq CUCrld11iGA EUGMEERIfa; Division ERCROACINEUr PE651T FEE SCHEDULE an No. 5157 "ll": Does not Include current fee for .rlting permit " pgvmmt deposits EKIOEERIW InSPECTI01i FE[ •ASTDRATIW /OELIRU710:1 cASll SUB TOTAL OLPOSIT ET00 ER 7 COSTS WDIRIERUTIO.1 SURETT(CASI) N/A FAITIVUL PEUCT; YCE OOIN (IOUs) LAWR MIT /IATERIAL BOIW (SOS( • eSPrdudllntcity-or aaT cuciladings tsrmunicipal ea:r., Title 1, cwpter I.m. 0 "de rt County p 5, o cash riot petim /dailaeatfpn a P ce to issu 1F an Construction Permit, R,rOed 7/67 3 �r: L.F P.C.C. curb - 12• C.F 24• gutter 7.25 L.f P.C.0 Curb - B• C.F 24• gutttr G.W L.F P,0.0 curb <at, 5.50 _ L.F. S,F S.i_ A.C. beret 41 P.C.0 tld"41k G' Adj Curb 4.S0 1.75 S.F Orl,e mr "u, B• P.C.C. Z 50 ��- C.T craft gutttr (Inc curb) Street 1.50 .�_ C.T ercavatlon Forted tmankeent 1.50 S.F. Preparatlon o• tubarade 1.50 0.15 S.F YOU Cr.i"it ag9, bate (per Inch thick) A.C. (ore, O,W TO:i 1IW tonal A.0 1900 to 1100 tans) 27.00 TW A.0 500 to 900 tons) 15.00 T, 55.00 TOY A.C. under 500 tons) r3 60,00 S.f S.F. S.F. A.C. 1• thick) Patch A.C. (trench) O.SS S.F 1• thick A.0 merlaF 1.75 0.10 U. U. Adjust tear "mole to pride 250,07 EA. Adjust sbtr clean out to grade 150.00 U. Adjust .attr talsee to grad, Street lights Ireloeaeel 75.00 L.F Bell lead*% Ilnters". SSW min) SOU,W I.00 L G S.F 2 a 4• red M header Remora) of A.0 1.75 Fiat L.F "anent penmral of P.C.C. curb A /utter B• 1.15 Cr 3,10 L.F U. Remus) of A.C. been I.00 1.00 U. Street signs Refiectbn and posts Z L.F. Concrete block .all 15.00 25.00 S.F Retaining .all 20.00 Tai Aggregate base 7.00 C.Y. L.F. Concrete %trutti,ras Ill- RCP 2000 0 425.00 L.F. 24• RCP 1500 D{ 29.00 L.f 7G• PCP 2000 0 15.00 L.f 48• UP 1200 U� 49.00 U. Catch basin Y • 4• 76.00 U. Catch basin M • B' 2000.00 (A. Catch besfn M • 22' 2900.00 E.A. Local depression 4• 4iW.00 U• Local depression 12' S00'00 U. dunctlon structure 1000.00 x'00 -�- EA. EA. Outlet structure, Std 8506 salsa -a, 1500.00 Ex stn <tu Std IPSO? Guard posts SW.W L.F. Guard panel (wood) 40.00 L.f Sa.rut 25.00 U. dead.all 148• .Ing) 2.00 F. Red" d header 4000.00 S.F Landscapinyy L Irrigation 1.75 L.F. Roil Cur., `P.C.C.) 2.75 7.50 EKIOEERIW InSPECTI01i FE[ •ASTDRATIW /OELIRU710:1 cASll SUB TOTAL OLPOSIT ET00 ER 7 COSTS WDIRIERUTIO.1 SURETT(CASI) N/A FAITIVUL PEUCT; YCE OOIN (IOUs) LAWR MIT /IATERIAL BOIW (SOS( • eSPrdudllntcity-or aaT cuciladings tsrmunicipal ea:r., Title 1, cwpter I.m. 0 "de rt County p 5, o cash riot petim /dailaeatfpn a P ce to issu 1F an Construction Permit, R,rOed 7/67 3 �r: RESOLUTION N0, sac4"M 8. -1 a 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 85 -24 WHEREAS, tie City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on April 8, 1985, by Rancho Cucamonga Business Park, as developer, for the deesscribednthe therein, andrgenerallyalocatedeon the of Haven; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Oevelepm`at Review No. 85 -24; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by goad and sufficient ImprVent Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. Rancho Cucamonga, California, that saidy Improve mentouAgreementhanditsaid Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby aut:3rized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this • day of AYES: NOES: ASSENT: ATTEST: every . t e et, ty er Jeffrey ng, aymr I X39 r� DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i STAFF REPORTt��� 4 a Ia May 7, 1986 u L977 d' City Council and City Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineer Technician APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AYD IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITONAL USE PERMIT 85 -17, LOCATED ON BASE LINE, EAST OF TURNER, SUBMITTED BY FOR KIDS ONLY, LTD. Co..uitional Use Permit 85 -17 was approved by the Planning Comaitsion on November 13, 1985. me The Developer, For Kids Only, Lid , is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $18,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: E 9,000.00 + A %LLer of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Mater District. RECOM1EMBATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing tho Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. %RespetI 11 Sy�u,141 led, LBH: o Attachments of 41 r . k9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION /X/ PROJECT: c--- n," TITLE: _ EXHISM "a" V �V .1. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CUP 85 -17 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referr- ed to as the City, by and between said City and Fat Y Irm_ hereinafter referred to as the_ oper. THAT. WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Turner Avenue; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Devel Wr as prerequisite to granting of final a approval; and I -�' WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter Cited, an; approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be ^quivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as fol•ows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all improvements described on page 4 hereof within 12 months from the date hereof. 2 This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval unlcss an exten- sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In considera- tion of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the Improvement security, and to require adSus.ments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. / ` ,-d 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at avy time to cause said provisions to be completed by any law- ful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. 5. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Devel- oper from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right -of -way, and the developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the regulations contained therein. Non - compliance may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. Public right -of -way improvement work required shall be constricted in conformance with approved Improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall Include any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or ommissions discovered during construc- tioi shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work Vwi to said plan modifications shall be iN_ covered by the provisions` of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 1. Work done within existing streets shall be diligent- ly pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustifiell delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocations, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The prin- cipal amount of said improvement security shall not be less than the amount shown: 13 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: $18,000.00 Name and address of surety: DEVELOPERS INSURANCE OWANY 333 Wilshire Ave, Anaheim, Ca 92801 Type: MATERIAL AND LABOR Principal Amount: $9,000.00 Name and address of surety: DEVELOPERS INSURANCE CCMPANY 333 Wilshire Ave, Anaheim, Ca 92801 CASH DEPOSIY NUNUNENTATION Type: Principal Amount: N/A Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HtftOF, the parties hereto have caused these Sj presents to be duly executed and acknowledge with all formalities required by law on the dates aet forth opposite their signatures. _ v Date _ by '..(�.,e�..fl�)`Ya -t'�i Developer ' 1986 gnature Antoinette Holguin, President Printed Date by , Developer "( Signature Printed Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation By: Attest: / / / /,,// ty y ee r k�j�!' �' Approve ✓�er__J+- �/ - r1�/>'i' /"' -r..� ty ttorney Mayor DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURES Nbol BE NOTARIZED AND COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATc 3 1 tfS-1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING CIVISIOH ENCROACHMENT PERHIT FEE SCHEDULE For Improvement: For Kids Only Date: A ril 3 98 _ omp File Re er nce: UP 85 -1 City NOTE: Dues not Include current fee for writing permit or pavement deposits _ QUANTITY UNIT ITEN PRICE AMOUNT 129 42 3 L.F. P.C.L. curb - 8' C.F. 24" gutter 6.00 744.00 S.F. 4" P.C.C. side-talk 1.75 7 0.25 355 4T— S.F. TON Drive approach A.C. (under 500 tons) 1 EA. Adlust sewer manhole to grade 60.00 250.00 2640.Op 250.00 2 724 EA. S.I. Relocate water meter 200.00 400.00 ITO - L.F. Removal of A.L. pavement Removal of P.C.C. curb O. ?5 �6 8.60 _ 552 S.F. 3.30 2.00 363.00 1306.00 �— �— S.F. EA. Removal f sidech Removal of sidewale Street trees 2.00 272_g_ �— 1Co.no Do!Off' EA. Remove wa1T (Klnlacc) 1000.1,0 00.0 ' 1 4r— EA. L.F. Outlet structure, S.d +507 Sawcut 500.00 500.00 1 - EA. Grading 2.00 1500.06 98.00 5�j'00;00— 1 EA. Engineering (Design, Survey, 4600.00 00-d' O,po Staking Cert.) VIG.NEERING INSPECTION *RESTORATION FEE 900.00 SUB TOTA: '- 15 557.15 /DELINEATIOII CASH 1000.00 CONTINGENCY COSTS - ? 3:3.5 DEPOSIT (REFUNDABLE' FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (100%) NONUNENTATION SURETY (CASH) N/A LABOR AND HATERIPL BOND (50%) _- ��0660W y E - *Pursuant to City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title I. Chapter 1.08, adopting San Bernardino County Code Titles, Chapters 1 -5, a cash restordtion /delineation depnsiL shall be side prior to Issuance of an Engineering Construction Permit. Revised 3/84 /`Y' S RESOLUTION NO. TMT -Ur-M 94o - 14 L/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITONAL USE PERMIT 85 -17 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on April 8, 1986, by For Kids Only, Ltd., as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Base Line, east of Turner; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Conditional Use Permit 85 -17; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. Ispe �} NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamunga, California, that said improvement Agreement and said Improvement :accrfty be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City rlerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and AOCPTED this * day of *, 19* AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jeffrey Mg, a—A yogi ATTEST: evelerrly A-' P etFT ET CTe-i� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineer Technician r1ml 1977 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10076, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BANYAN BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AND HERMOSA AVENUE SUBMITTED BY LIGHTNER DEVELOPMENT AND CONTRACTING, AND SUMMARILY VACATING A PORTION OF BANYAN STREET, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND WES1 OF ALTA LOMA CHANNEL Tract 10076 was approved by the Planning Commission on August 25, 1982, for the division of 6.9 acres into 19 lots in the Low Residential Development District located on the soWside of Banyan between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues. The Developer, Lightner Development and Contracting, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvement: in tho, following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $128,500.0 , Labor and Material Bond: S 64.250.0 Lrt.ers of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.0 &R.s have ai:o been approved by the City Attorney. As a Condition c' Approval of T�ntarlve Tract Map 10076, a portion of Banyan Street, east of ArchiL•Jld and west of Alta Loma Channel is to be realigned, leaving ar, existing portion of right -ut -way not needed for street purposes. when vacated, this portion of Banyan Street will be Included in Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Tract Map 10076. RECOMMENDATION It 1s recommended that the C1'; Council adopt the attache, resolutions approving the vacation of a portl,- of Banyan Street, and approving Tract 10076, accepting said agreement and serLrity and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said ,.greement and to cause said map and vacation to record. IV2 1 z a -- sro w w salad r f,om ._ t BANYAN u a � Ye'MRrI 14 IS 16 10 .I — — L16EN*1' — _I_STFgf—__ -- .v lr•.[Iw r � I• Airwi ♦aTarnfr, aroe au T TuMc.un- a -rr -Gj C 1 ii,rYar ,rcraxwa1 grrYfnr w. ww /unrwf.w _ / Y 1 .olYr.,lnss, oYl I I �\ 35 I I ro' 1 2B I 30 1 31 32 1 33 1 34 V CITY OF PROJECT. TRACT 10076 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: vlr:HiTr ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: "A” 5 � 6 L = wnV „d � ,,...• •� .W Oo yjp 9 6 7 yn w e•f 'M(l ifl✓ r�, t a$Y �• a• O I — — L16EN*1' — _I_STFgf—__ -- .v lr•.[Iw r � I• Airwi ♦aTarnfr, aroe au T TuMc.un- a -rr -Gj C 1 ii,rYar ,rcraxwa1 grrYfnr w. ww /unrwf.w _ / Y 1 .olYr.,lnss, oYl I I �\ 35 I I ro' 1 2B I 30 1 31 32 1 33 1 34 V CITY OF PROJECT. TRACT 10076 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: vlr:HiTr ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: "A” CITY OF RARCHO COcAMOnGA IMPRO9EMERI AGREEMENT FOR TRAct 10070 KNOW ALL HER by THESE PRESENTS: that this 491t tot Is ode and enter[! into, In conformance with the Or.rislo o/ the $Ybaivlf lan Nag Act ./ the $[eta Of California an Of the app iic..ia Ordinances of the City of Rancno r among', hell In,fta, a muneci10al corporation, by and betret" . / City. .Rein Uter referred to as the City. and ti gh tiwr peatl.w ' r e. 1 hs rein otter rev...to •� serf lAA er ' O Me NITNESSETH: HAT. WHEREAS. said Developer Of tree to dn!'uo certain real DrpDarty In said CIt Y as scorn On LM Condltf once lJ aD.. red sYbdl•tN on tnovn ai _1.0101 I00)6 _: and WHEREAS. said City has established .0111 Aln r<ONru 01.14 to be not by said Oevelnper as DrerequlN to to a9Dr.rat�yf said subdivision qen oval ly located AS 4 the south std r B ro 7rtw< �t� eA*" b.. NOW, THEREFORE, It it hereby agreed by said City and by said DArelOper as faltowst 1 The Developer hereby agrees t. ....tract It or wish, ee0ente all I4pro )1901.1. dmcrf0ed oe page d hare- Of w1th1A tMe ire months from t1R effective de 4 hereof 2. This agreement .hail be effective On the data Of the resolution of the Council of ;lid City approving this agreetent. This 'gresment shall be in default On the day foltor- inq the first anniversary deft Of Laid aDploral unlaaf a0 e,ten- &ICA of 91010 has been granted by said City as herelless 4 proved. 7. The 0014141011 all request an fsteniton of time to omDIece the tares hereof. Such request [ball be submitted to lane .tty to writing sot taus than 20 days be/Ora the upir'e tO. daft h4r6cf, and shall contain a Statement of he fantances iec,ssit"Ing the ettanslm 0• live. The City shall have the M qwt to -011th the prnv f An% of th•s agreement, Including the 9.nttfvtt ,on fundard.. Utt aRlaJt s, an0 LDrare01tat Security, and .0 rsrulre adlasemen•[ t,, I. ft .A• sYbatantlll eSecur "s recurs. during the term hersnf. 1. If the "11109.1 Tails or neg.ects t0 COS01y with of Any ti eta Orrrlslon3 of this aqrcesunt, the Cibr shall have the right me t. 'Ause 411 Ornvisi01f to La not by any lawful th:'I. aed '11reppon rtcov•r frpq the hertlo0er and /ar hit <urety xht full cost and evpe "d tac4rr.d. nch tot of 9414 developm+she)) t in acc3rd&ACG trip., t"err.q.latconto schaduln, and ten of the cucloangs County Na Nr Of strict. 6. The Ca°aloper shall be res10oslble for reDl<ceneltt re location. Or ict wit of as/ component At auy Ir•igat Jn water s)sem to canillct wleh cm t•ruca or •t radulred :'Dro•uen es t0 ' satesf 4Ctf.n of the el -y Eng D:.r and thr ovosr Or vec4 water system• -1- 190 N. Euclid Avenue, Ste. 202 Upland, California 91106 Tracts And !ur/Ind. P.M. tonro.m to 'he tii; eivasts ipaalrid to be Cc Structtd shall the City. I'd to the tmpravemtn tf Plan atandJ rd TPIClflcatfens of the offs City En fntrr pproved by and an file In OR the Co.,truCtlont and g60nd Estimate np hereby tIncO porateda tan 0490 6 What, at taten from the Improvement plant llstrd thereon a nuaber The Developer shall alto be refpdnflblc for ConstruC- tlon of .my transitions or other Incldental work beyond the tract boundaries as needed for Safety and proper surface drainage Errors or oemlfslenS discovered during conttructfn corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer shall it RavLto work oua alp sold plan coal /lcatlons shall bs covered by the pronflons of thlt agreement and Secupd by the to rely Corerinq the original pl +n nod worts• 6 Construction permits (hall bt obtained by tAa care toDV from alt! office of the City Engineer Prior [o Start o/ work; all regdl,ti Cns listed thereon shall be o0teo with at emtlon given to safety protadures, control of dust, nd lie, or at still M, And City Departments.t0 Falluren Oto / comply n witAOMIS t action 'kill be subject to the Den altlei Provided therefor, T� �Oayy. The Developer Shall be responsible for •gmo,,l of Or adjoining t said 0aj ♦eel oD cave srtultingitf from gwdrtOrelative within S at davtlopmen., to diligently 10. Pork done within existing streets Shall Ds Durav00 to Co. Plat""; the City shall have the rfgt.t to cis0 Lta an and all work In the event Of unJustlfled delay in con' iatton, and to recover ail Cot and avpente incurred from thf Oavtopar an0 /or h1i contractor br any lawful means. ll. Slid LereloDer shall at all ties, following oldies. tlon of the strict, and easements In %to tubldivision, up to the Completion and aCCept+nCt of std work Or Improvement by Snid City Council, girl goad and adequate warnlnT to the travail np Public Of each and every dangerous Condition existent In said strait or easement. and -111 protect the traveling public from Such defective or`dangereus Conditions Until the COepletlon Of all Improvements, herein Incorporated on Pape 6 , to be performed, Rich of said Streets not accepted as feproroenta Shall be under the charge Of said Developer. Said Oaraloof ohpar s+Y close all or a portion of any Street subject to the by t s contained in a tamperarY Street closure permit. Issued 0Y the CftY Engineer, whenever it 1S necessary to protect the Public drring the COnitrmctlpn of the to be made 1eDrartaent3 herein agroem Planted er the PDevelopertrees aftere otherd inpragmNmt Owork. hall ng Provide- Clanpp has been completed Plantln9 shall 0f done as approved by he City C to tcorda.,, with the planting diagram Y the City CoreunitY Deg lopean, Director. eThe Oe•r• +aer Malt al responsible unti for ealattafng all trees alntenance goad health untie the and of the Yuarant cad Leer. period, or for one Year after planting, vhgChOver h 1j, The Ocre toper IS ref0ons ibla /or mutln9 all tendl- dons establls he by en I e EbY Ou recant to thR Subdlvlsion -Y_ /5-6 "so Act, City Ordlances, and lhls aerle.emt for the development, 'r for the maintenance Of all Improvements Constructed tAer Cit er and Until ne the ovem@ Improvement If iccCgtad for maintenance by bt released before such eKCeptamCef Security heriSnVith vrnvidedh and out horlted by the City Council of the City, 11 This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee 'curlty herelnafter described has been released by the City, Or until A new agreeaent together With the required IOPrOveOent tecurlty has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named And by resolution of the City Improve ant I iech Improve t been acne oCed. and this agreeaent and the •rlty tnerelar has been eel ....0 is The Improvement 11CUritY to be Turn 'had by the D'el0pef rlth that 1911...n; Shall Consist rf the falto.ing and I 411 be le a /arm acceptAble by the City attorney: A- To secure faithful Performance of this agreement 1. A bond er bonds by one Cr more duly authorized corporate Sureties In the fora and content C�rf = oat Imp nresento Security Code Instrument Section 6the'arm and content specified by the City attorney. J A deposit With the City of money or negotiable bonds of till kind approved for securing I*Posits of PuOIIC cant*% e To secure laborers And materi4imen: 1. A bond or bonds by one 01 more duly authorized corporate sureties In the fare and Content specified by Government Code Section 66499 1. 2 An Improvement Security Instrument in the /arm J• and Content Speclfi by cl the City Attorney. deposit With City of money or negotiable bonds Of the kind approved for securing C. a c+sA deposit With the City to guarantee Payment by the Oevalcper to the engineer or surveyor Whale eertiflcata aPPearf upon the Ff nal D1p for the f attlny of all boundary, let corner, and street centerline monuments end for furnishing centerline eft notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any mount Certified b) the sngineer Cr farreyor as acceptable payment 1n full; or. if no Value If Submitted. the Cash band $hall be 4% Shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate cantalned herein. Said cash deposit may be refund*d as soon as peace_ dure Permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie note! and rrtttsn affu'n' of Payment In fu from th* angln'r or servgpq 0 The re bonds and th* Pr tpctval +mounts thereof an fat forth on page 6 0/ this agreement. 16. The Developer warrants that the fmproveeen is descrlBaO In eels agreement $bell be free free defects In ns tent fanndneto abet d .Sean' Any tO ne pO rt loot of the improve- motor mpvro us_ data on welch the I•prelementt are aC'.ptia lbw the City Shat Ithe be rapalead h replaced by 0e..leper fret er all cbarims to the City. 1.e Ca. q,ar Shall furnish a m+lntenmca guarantee $ecuri it In •Sum agu ai to ten part. he (10%) of t _S_ he c0nttractlon /s/ Is"04tt or $200 00. whichever is great,, t0 secure the faithful perfareanq of Developer ; o *l-nations is described In this para. 9r con The an nte,anth guarantee Idcurlt, Shall alto secure the f 4:thlul pCrfalmancg Ly the Oavelooer of any obligation Of the Otve100er to do specified wart with r91GCCt t0 any parkway malntenanCe S%St%s0ent di$tflt: Once the ImOr N <n to tf have beta aC Cott and 4 m41n[tdlnce guarantee security hat Ott, accepted by the City. the other ImOrOrement Security d91cHb" In tn12 i Irell, n[ may be reef lsed prop ded that such reltale If ithe Mlle aYt harp ed by the Subdivision 'tap act and any 30011caoi! City Ordinance 37 That the Oevallatr Shall take out end maintain Such D"lle liability and property damage insurance of %hall protect him Ind SAY contractor or subcontractor perfo,mlrg wart Covered Iy this Agre"ent from claims for Dr a p e r tt damages which may H ism because of the nature of the cart or free operations under I his agreement• whether Such operations be by himself or by any cbutractdr or subcontractor, or anyone directly or Indirectly "Played by said persons• even though $,In damage, be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any Contractor or subcontractor or anyone "ploy" by Said pert*,$ The pVJIC 1 lity and property damage Insurance shalt list the CIt' a2 " tonal insured and directly protect the City. 1U Officers. a9entl and employees• 42 roll as the Dave loper, his contractors Ind his subcontractors• and all Insunnte policies Issued her cup der shall So State Tne ml"wis amounts of Such Insurance snail be as fellers: A Contractor's liability Insurance providing bodily Injury or death liability limits of not lets the S310.000 for each person and St 000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and Property dina9e Ilabil- Ity limits of not less than $100.000 for each 4.at- dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of $250,000 far Claims which may arise from the opera- tions of the 0nel0Per In the ptrfermence of the wart herein prat l de d. IT Automobile liability Insurance Covering all vehicles used in the performance of this agreement Providing bodily injury liability %felt$ c1 not I ess than 5200,000 for tech parson and 5700,000 for each accident Or occurrence. and Property damage liability limits of not 1913 than 350.000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not Ins than $100.000 which may arise from the opera. along of the Developer or Ms Contractor in Performing the wart DrOeidtd for hen in. Is That before the execution or this agne0ent, tilt Developer Inser still• :1L with the City • eertl HCata or Nrtt /ic nog I Insurance covering the %Pacified insurance Each such certlf,cate shall bear an endorsement Precluding the c"cellatlCnf• or reduction In coverage of any potty wn sciences 6y each Certificate, before the expiration of thirty (70 da s :User sha C7ty shall have received notlfl at, by n9fiteri0 ,I T free the Insurance carrier As evidence of understanding the provisions Contained herein. end of IAt'" tP con ply with 2400, the Subdivider bat submitted the to l awing described Improvement security• and has art lxtd his a 0nllure heretol .a. /V t� FAITHFUL PERFORPANCE Type: Ir 16CIDal Amount: 5128,500 "AMC and Addrets of tore[ DEVELOPERS INSURAUCE CONPANT T: 333 WLIshtre Are, Anahele, Ca 92801 MATERIAL AND LABOR PATNENT Type: Printloai Aso:nt: 61,130 "AMC and Addrast of fyret DEVELOPERS INSURAUCE CCNPANy y: 333 Nllahlre Ave, Anahele, CA 92801 CASH DEPOSIT NOMUNENTATION Type: Principal boon[: 2,130 NAee AMC Address Of surety DETELOPERS INSURANCE COMPAUT 733 N1_anlre Ave, Anahele, Cm 92801 MAIATEMANCE GUARANTEE Type' Principal Amount: N/A 11Ae94A0 address of surety: 'Tw JF TO RE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTAh1E BY ' CITY IN Nt3OESS HEREOF, the parties hereto Eaee CAUted these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all I are alftles required by 1&- On the dates tAt To eODO to their e 1 1 Ature, N Be,- 4112 -4-' by tore 4erelo0er r erne N ll ehtnrr Ll ht 0 1 went , rintea Data by 19n at. re •Developer rent en Accepted: City of Rancho coca morBe, C'Iifornl+ 1 A Municipal Corot atlon By: N yor Attest: y er Approved: nesac 1� DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST 8; NOTARIlEO •5. X53 tS a SAFEOO �.� y3J STATE OF LAIIFOIVM TITLEINSURANCE COUNTY OF 'An F+n=rdfi SS. On ws am -- TS pry d_A,i7 1aHf— batara 0a en WJKSVad.a No" PLtk M am Im aaid Caa%and Stall. PeraauR/ appaarad Pmrg2 H. TdOhtH r —Pwswwym wa bma a Prawd to me bUft 1. aaaataeWly&iUx 0MN P'r'°" MmarWna_uLacOe00aa1wiP + f Maumra aM ed PUt�_a>te owaama. � �GEGl�C- Cami secure FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP 1,1 •• City OF DRAW CUCAMONGA er ENGINEERING DIVISION • CNCROACIMENT PERMIT FEE SCIIEDULE for feoro7reet• irocc IWIA Date: File Re arc a: �. oepu[a y; U. euw, u�ero a nuonarea, i�c. City Drawing ROTE: Does rot Include Current fee for writing Pen•.t Or pas rent deposits OUANf1TT UNIT ITEM PRIC! ANOUIIT L.F L.F P.C.C. Curb - I2• C.F 24• gutter 7.25 L.F P.C.C. curb - 8• C.F. 24• gutter 6,00 ':':'Cu r only TT;y L.F. I077Cr- S.F. S.SO A.C. kera 4.50 /• P.C.C. sldtwalk S.F. S.F. �T- 1.75 Orlva approach 2.!A B• P.C.C. cross gutter (Inc. curt) 7.10 "I'l RLZII v a �Jt'iJ C.Y T Street eccawtian 7.� Irparted cffianseant ZrT- S.F. m..r, S S.F 1.50 Preparatfcn of to rode 0.15 Crushed 199• base - 'srt -s• TOM per Inch thick) 4• 0.07 A.C. over 1700 tons) 27,q T..TiOS 10N Ton A.C. 900 to 1700 tons) 75.07 A.C. 500 to 900 tort) 4ThS_ Ta 46 00 A.C. under 500 tons) 60.00 =r.-• .i. A.C. v thick) 0.55u:-rr Patch A.C. (treacn) l.)S T, S.F 1• thick A.C. Overlay 0 70 �..� i� EA. �-� EA. Adjust sewer naraWle to grade 2cA.00 AdJutt fewer clew out to grade 1SD,Op FA. �- EA. AdluIt water calves to grade )5,00 Iso.W L.F. Street lights 1000.00 1111 adds (lntersec S500 014) 1.00 ![.f1pC.M L.F. 2 A P recwWd header 1.)5 S.F L.F Resoval of A.C. parcunt 0.75 Aemral of P.C.C. Curb -t L.F. EA. 7.70 A, +oval of A.C. tern 1.00 -� EA. Street signs 200 00 Reflectors Asd posts 75.00 gip; L.F. __- S.F Concrete block wall 25.00 Retaining wall TON 20.00 Aggregate bate 700 C.T. L.F. Concrete structures /25.00 18• PCP 2000 0 L.i L.F. 29.00 2d• RCP 1500 0 75.00 RCP 2000 0 ��� L.F all- 4 49.00 8• RCP I2W O 76.00 w T -75�b- EA. U, Catch basin V • V Catch basin V . B. 2000.00 T- EA. T Catch basin N a 43. 2 '� 60 DD,DD -6.040.00- EA. Local depression. 4. Local depressloe 42' 2.000.00 -3mr.w- EA. Junction structure _ U. EA. Outlet structure, F7 vg I�O'� OutWtpdseseture.RdGi` Ir� V 6 D -� L.F 40.00 5 wcat Joel (voW I C • C ¢aj 25.00 EA. L.F. S.F. McWr111 (4a• wing) 2'00 Re 01 4'ader .0000 .00 rr��T p�O ttrM� 1.75 Landscaping L.F. b Irtl9kttOA 2.75 Roll curb (P.C.C.) 7.50 i IIGINEERIIG INSPECT;ON FE`: y <s SUB TOTAL 91DEPOSITI(R /00.IXGTION CASH ..Oco CONNtHGENCT CCSTS(lot) DEPOSIT (REFUNOASLE1 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE 9W7 IOOL 1kM1tiEATATIOM SURETY (EASN) ) W 1.150 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (50%) %An in s� %AO o0 Tursoant to City of Raul Cucason a Maell Coda. Title I, Chatter 1.00• adopting San kroardino County Code Titles. Chapters 1 -5, a Cash rcstoratlon we eade Pride to Isswect /dellneatia de of a Engirearing Construction Parole. past shalt SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE NO PERFORMANCE SETTING OF FINAL MONUMENTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucasonga p 0 Boa 807 Rancho Cucadonga, Calif ... la 91730 Gentlest": Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of tM f.Orernw ant Cad.. the undersigned hereby agrees tort ail eon Ye entl tern" on the final sAD of Tract 10076 art to be fat and furnished p) tnf IYDOly lder a Ong initr Dr syarelto a ar before July, 1967 as Specified In the Engineer s or a '_010 S v[" "tale anu agrees to furnish the natas thar... to caaOltta all engineerinq r...lr seen is specified in Section 65,97, Of the Government Cade The undersigned hands you rerevlth the tow of S 2 150 of t cash deposit, said de0aslt to guarantor .no". : ewon ascots •ill he Set and the notes furnished at above provided Do or the date specified and that the engineer or sOrveyor:4 1i11 0 aid by the undarstgnad It 1S further understood and 19rted that in the event the undersigned falls to Complete the above re0ulrewants vlthla the time Specified, the City of aancnO eu� among Is autnorlted to costlthe sold Seoul See its or Cause them to b, is and the cast thereof p to be a charge 49.1. S, Bald cash deposit, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga I! author "tad to wale the necessary fund transfer from fold Cash deDO alt to the Credit for the proper city fund It Is further agreed that If the under$ fined duet not present evidence to the City Council that M M! paid the engineer or turvfyor for the Setting of the final mo aid th and 1f the 6y Inver h fan a }Dr gi re! the notices Prescribed 1n Section 6[197 of the Co n rnwent Code, the City smell Pay to said engineer or surveyor, the Cdsh atposlt Aare In ode f the cost of toe Pleting said requirements exceeds the amount Of the Cash deposit, the undarsi5 "ed agrees to paY the cif hrtn ^e within thirty O0) days aftoo receiving volts a she from the City of Rancho t CU camong- S.eclfYing the .,Duet of the requiresen fit Neen the CaSh deposit and tee actual COs: of said raqulreaentf Cordially, Lightner Davelopsent 3 Contracting Subdivider 320 M. Euclld Avenue, Ste. 202 Address Upland Glifdanla 91786 Date Apcll IS, 1966 The d;pasiter of record (for return of any portion of the de GO Sit) shall be cash Lldhtner tl0valo a;�f 390 N. Euclid Suite 202 Vw3mM, OnI![o a rcisi.I MOTE; TO BE SUBMITTED FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED /1-6 RESOLUTION NO. Ei5�9�-0iiR. 8(. �aJ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT 110. 10076 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 10076, consisting of 19 lots, submitted by Lightner Development and Contracting, Subdivider, located on the south side of Ba.iyan, between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided In the Subdivision Mao Act of the State of California, and in compliance with tht requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Rap of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreenent submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufflclent Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offerin or dedication for public use the streets !4lineated thereon. NOW. THEREFORE, eE :T RESOLIED by the City Cedncil of the C.cy of Rancho Cucamonga, Califon ,, as follows: 1. That said improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clark is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; —id 7. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Te#Trey ng�— :i RESOLUTION NO. 9(0 - I �) L A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF BANYAN STREET, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND NEST CF ALTA LOHA CHANNEL. WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of the City Street hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that a portion of Banyan Street, east of Archibald Avenue and west of Alta Loma Channel, is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes because it has been superseded by relocation. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City W.il of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby me ek�£s order vacating that portion of street on Hap v -057 an file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucaaongn, anich has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said port 3—onor Banyan Street, east of Archibald Avenue, no longer constitutes a street or public utility easement. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution o e recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of Hay, 1986, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jettrey King, Fra or AS- 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Banyan Street Vacation Being those portions of Banyan Street as identified per Instrument 80. 81 -047418, Official Records recorded March 5, 1901 and Instrument To. 80- 026662, Official Records recorded January 30, 1980 lying within tots L. 51 and 52, Foothill Frontless Fruit Company's Tract No. 2. Per plat recorded in Book 20, Page 34 Of Naps in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Sea Bernardino, State of California. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" /s9 -'Fa I Ll z �a � aq r � a� 7;1 • I 9 a8o S i s a ,ec .cc dSo9 =�.s- e•w�u ..oe nir X s" a3 V 7;1 • I 9 a8o S i s a ,ec .cc dSo9 =�.s- ,1 i H CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA C`CAa�ol• STAFF REPORT A9 , °.r. ci 1 C� O A Z lair � DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Development Review 65 -34 located on the northwest corner of Toronto and Seventh Street submitted by Kajima International, Incorporated. %W ir: Development Review 85 -34 was approved by the Planning Commission on December 10, 19&5. The Developer, Kajima International, Incorporated, is submitting an agreeme•,t and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $21,000 Labor and Material Bond: $10,500 A letter of approval has been recelveJ from Cucamonga County Hater District. RECCO RATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Res tfuUy su tted, L s 1 At chaents 161 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR D.R. 85-34 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referr- f,d xto IN7ERNATIONAL,fi.�EY' by and between said City hereinafter referred to as the eve a—b� per. THAT. WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain raal property in said City located on the northwest corner of Toronto and 7th Street and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and Ted WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requiremants for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all improvements described on page 4 hereof within 12 months from the date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten- sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Developer way request additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In considera- tion of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warrantee by substantial changes therein. /6 r=�L 4. If the. Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any law- ful means, and tAereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. S. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Devel- oper from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right-Of-way, and the developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the regulations contained therein. Ron - compliance may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. public right -of -way improvement work required shall be constructed in conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or Public safety. Errors or ommissions discovered during construc- tion shall be correctel upon the direction of the City,. Engineer. Revised wvK* ire to said plan modifications shall be" covered by the provifton. of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 7. Work done within existing streets shall be diligent- ly anytand pall ework; to htheCevent shall unjustified del ay in Completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocations, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way. trees as directed by0thelCommunitylDevelopmentdDirector ..n parkway 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The prin- cipal amount of said improvement security shall not be less than the amount shown: 1�3 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type. Principal Amount: 21,000 00 Name and address Of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR Type: Principal Amount: 10,500.00 Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type. Principal Amount: N/A Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these S, Presents to be duly E uted and acknowledge with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures. Date_,�s -/ „'D /o /•7J'1 by lleve lap elr� e _ ,i i gna ure c�.__, ., Takuii Funaki r me ; Date_ by gnature Devcloder . m e Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation By: Hayor Attest: ty er / Approved :%".G %a .fs'A�ss+ -ifo7 ttorney DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURES MUST BF NOTARIZED AND COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE /'P 51 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE For Improvement: TOKAI SCRIPTO - 7th Street and Toronto Avenue Date: 3 -14.86 File Ae nLe: Computed by: NOLLENHAUER. HIGASHI City Drawing lo. NOTE: Does not include current fee for writing permit or pavement deposits a MOORE INC. QUANTITY UNIT ITEM PRICE AMOUNT L.F. P.C.C. curb - 12' C.F. 24° gutter 7.25 92 L.F. P.C.C. curb - 8' C.F. 24' gutter 6.00 T--50—.00 L F. P.C.C. curb only 5.50 4,930 S.F. S• P.C.C. sidewalk 1.75 8 62 .50 2.052 S.F. Drive approach 2.50 53?T70.00 EA. Adjust sewer manhole to grade 250.00 2 EA. Street lights 1000.00 .000.00 L.F. Barricades (intersec. $500 min) 1.00 460 S.F. Concr����e d�riveway 1.00 - 4Tf L F. 48' RCli ,200 D) 76.00 ,1.00 a T- EA. Outlet structure, Std 0507 500.00 2.000.00 ENGINEERING INSPECTION FE4 �1 Oi0�.00 SUB TOTAL 18 769.50� •RESTORATI011 /OELINFA7ION CASH 1,000.00 CONTINGENCY COSTS(30%) 1'876.95 DEFOSIT (REFUNDABLE) FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (100 %) — CI 70Y0.00 NONUMENTATION SURETY (CASH) N/A - LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (505) 10 � *Pursuant to City of Rancho Cucamnga Municipal Code, Title 1, Chapter 1.08, adopting San Bernardino County Code Titles, Chapters 1 -5, a cash restoration /delineation deposit shall be made prior to issuance of an Engineering Construction Permit. Revised 3/84 / W�5- CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDC4ENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) as On this / /rH day of =0111 L In the year /29l , before me, Robyn E. R she, a Notar n and for Bald County, personally appeared __ 4r wT /� personally known to me (or proved fr me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who executed the within Instrr nt as president for secretary) or on behalf _ of the corporation therein na�C and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed It. WITNESS HY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 0MC1AL ftAi ROBYN E RISHe p.,^ ,w,w�r n�ue. cuvouw Ntoe w�ogtw couwrt [smart a L>+tt Api Sl.l� RESOLUTION NO. 605-0" $4 -1 aZ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 85 -34. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for Its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on April 10, 1986, by Kajiod International, Incorporated, as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of Toronto and Seventh Streets; and WHEREAS, the Installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Revi w No. 85 -34; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Imprbjesent Security, which is identified in said -3 Improvement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved Ind the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Cierk to attest thereto. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: aver y A. AutheleF­.TTfy—CT­err Jeffrey ng, or /� 7 4 %e; CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA STAFF REPORT 4 C DATE: May 7, 1986 9 i p'utr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Jae D. )Iltel, Ctut,J.l JeRrn Muq R4h,ra M. )L DAI Datl Pamehl. lF.i[tl CE T CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL A STANDARD CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, GENERAL CONDITIONS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS `Y FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BLVD. (CHINA ALLEY) SAN BERNARDINO ROAD FEET AND FOOOOTHlu BoINTERSECTION . R 6600 FEET NEST City Clerk Bids Open February 25, 1986 LLOYD B. HUBBS _ CITY ENGINEER . - /N / aJSORASELUM ROAD, 9URRC • PWOMCEROZaoi • RANC110CUCAMONGA.CALIFOB.YI4fim • (1101 111311 NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Sao Bernardino County, California, directing this notice. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the Offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour c, 2:30 P.M. on the 25th day of February, sealed bids or proposals for the Improv.3nent of the North Sid- of Foothill Blvd., from 440 feet west of the intersection of San Bernardino Road and Foothill to 660 feet west (China i Alley) in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in tLe office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed t- the I City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, •Bid for Construction of Improvement of the North Side of Foothill Blvd., from 440 feet west of the intersection of San Bernardino Road and Foothill to 660 feet west.- PREVAILING Divisiont2. Parta7.oChapterwILhArticles 1 I and 2, the Contractor is require,' to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per dieto wages for work of a similar character in the locality in �, which the public work is Wforu.ed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per them wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Re,ations of the State of California required wages. Coples Ofdsuch prevailing rates gofeper them awages areeon f4lerin tithe I office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamongya, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C. Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are availablo to any interested party on request. The Contract!ng Agency also shall cause a copy of such dete-minatlons to be posted at the ,lob site. L The Cucamonga, twenty-five adollarse(S25a00�eforteach laborer,, workman, mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under tie attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the Provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. of the Attention is directed to the provisons in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 Code concerning subcontractoreunder ohnt of apprentices by the Section 1777.3, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen to any tpprenticeable Occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship comaittee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program to that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of A -1 /740 apprentices to Journeymen that %ill be used in the performance of the contract. The ration of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the tree of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the reauest for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ration if one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through spprenticesh'p training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 0. When the Contractor proviues evidence that he employs registered Apprentices on all of his cont-acts on an ivival avere3e of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is requiredd to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship prosrans if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenti:eable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site a•e making such contributions. ep The Contractor and subcT-tractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 17'7 5 and 1777.6 in the eaaloyment o' apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other - equirements may be obtained from the lirectar of Industrial Relations, 1 ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticesh p, San - rancisco, California, or frrm the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor snall constitute t legal day's work for all workmen employe) to the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any E Staten of aCalifc -nia shall with and governed in the 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a Penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic E employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said labore -, workman, ormechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed t to execute the work required by this cortrac' as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collec•ive bargaining agreements filed In accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal c.%sh, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount L A -2 equal to at least ten percent (10 %) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that tf.e bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, ccrtified'check, or bond shall became the property of the -- City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. i The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said %ark shall be one hundred percent (100%) c7 the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50 %) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the t work contracted to be done by he Contractor, or any owrk or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be requied to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. S No proposal will be considered from a Contractor who is not licensed in accordance with the provis' s of the Contractor's License Law (California 'Eu Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto or to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. t The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga an file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Rocd, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the Citj of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of k 5.00 , said S 5.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of 5 5_00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract t satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute l authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. L — Dated this 15th day of January , 1986. A -3 / 7 -�t PA0POSAL SCHEDULE OF UNIT COST AND LUMP SUM AMOUNTS IMPROVEMENT OF NORTHERLY SIDE OF FOOTHILL BLVD. FROM 44C FEET WESTERLY OF THE INTERSECTION OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND FOOTHILL BOULEVALRD TO 660 FEET WEST TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA: The undersigned bidder declares that he has carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that he has examined the plans, special provisions and specifications, and read the accompanying instruction to bidders, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this proposal is accepted, to furnish ail material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accor0ance with the Plans, Special Provisions and Specifications, in the time and man•%er therein prescribed for the unit cost and lump sum amounts set forth in the schedule on the following Proposal. Item Estimated Description No. Quantity (Unit Price in Words) 1 1.. S. Clearing and Grubbing at a lump sum trice of 2 17 L.F. P.C.C. Removal at per n�i e�oot 3 103 L.F. 6" p C.C. Curb at per neap oot• t C -1 73 Unit 1'rice Total (In Figure,,) (In Figures) S S �� S J✓" �� •/ s 75 s 37 °'°„/ S> Pse'6NOVd cc -A�r Bidder PROPOSAL SCHEDULE OF UNIT COST AND LUFP SUN AMOUNTS .- NORTH SIDE FOOTHILL 200 FEET WESTLY OF SAN BERNARDINO b FOOTHILL j. per o—n 9 375 L.F. Trench Excavation and Back 111 at per nea eet C -2 / 7T S 130 s S-21 ✓ S .ZS S O•Sd ✓ 1��= : 13cU� ✓ S 6o,2° f Ot 1O°✓ i r 0)-o er 4 159 L.F. 8• P.C.C. curb and & 24• Gutter at a n{r�s r per lin ear cot 5 873 S.F. P.C.C. Sidewalc and Access : Ramp at Y o per square oot r' 6 200 S.F. P.C.C. Crose- Gutter � and S dig � �t Rv"d I /t.±.c�� per square out 7 73 Tons Crushed Aggregate Base or �r Crushed Slag Base at 1 per ton 8 53 Tons Asphalt Concrete Pavement at per o—n 9 375 L.F. Trench Excavation and Back 111 at per nea eet C -2 / 7T S 130 s S-21 ✓ S .ZS S O•Sd ✓ 1��= : 13cU� ✓ S 6o,2° f Ot 1O°✓ i r 0)-o er PROPOSAL SCHEDULE OF UNIT COST AND I" SUM AMOUNTS NORTH ME FOOTHILL AT SAN BERNARDINO ROAD TTU}T—AAJjL SLIM —OF BID t Mords 13 6y-7 � a (Fig ures / t —15? 189 % r CAS t-- er t C -3 PROPOSAL BIDDER AGREEMENT The undersigned also agrees as. follows: FIRST: Within 15 calendar days from the receipt of the Notice of Award of Contract, to execute the contract, and to furnish to the City of RancF.o Cucamonga, Two (2) satisfactory bonds in the amounts specified in the Notice Inviting Bids guaranteeing the faithful performance of the work and payment of bills. SECOND: To begin work withir 10 calendar days after the date specified in tha Notice to Proceed and to prosecute said work in such a manner as to complete it within Fourteen (14) working days after such specified date. Accompanying this proposal is cash, a cashier's checx, or a certified check of a bidders bond for not less than ten percent of the total amount of tae bid payable to the City which is to be forfeited, as liquidated damages, if, in the event the contractor does not execute the contract and furnish satisfactory bonds under the conditions and within the time specified in this proposal, otherwise said cash. cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond is to be returned to the undersigned. Within 15 calendar days after award of the contract the City will return the bidders bond accompanying such pr:pcsal not considered in maki4a the award. All other bidders bonds will be held until the contract has beeh finally executed. They will then be returned to the respective bidders whose proposals they accompany. BIDDER: of corporation and names of the president, secretary, treasurer, and manager; copartnership, state true name of firm and names of all individual copartners composing firm; or an individual, state first and last names in full. Licensed in accordance within, pct rovi ng for the registration of Contractors, License No. -7 J Y SIGN HERE u cer t e �e cer tTi e Of f cer Title a-6 to Signature and title of the officer(s) set forth above shall be authorized to sign contracts on behalf of the corporation, copartnership or individual. If signature is by an agent, other than an officer of the corporation or a member of a partnership, a Power of Attorney must be on file with the City prior to or at time of bid opening; otherwise the bid will be subject to rejection by City Counsel. D -1 7,G p R o P 0 S A L BIDDER INFORMATION The bidder shall furnish the following information. Additional sheets may be attached if necessarjy�\ NAME OF FIRM: uJS'f "i �L3 D.J 9 CO.J9`TQcc� Type of Firm: Corporration_ Individual Partnership Business Address: /� Gf, /af3J5i F :D"rTw—.e. (.m Place of Business _oL " ra ,•� Place of Residence ( //,26n --- Telephone: e Contractor's license: `ie: Sy L License No. Names and titles of all members of the firm: Number of years as a contractor in construction work of this type:� Three projects of this type recently completed* Contract Amount Type of Prrlect Datgqm ted Owner's Name Addrs. TirCKY ria� Gr t w vS GC Person w o in .tied s(1SC/ of the proposed work for your � firm: Name: C Oate of Inspection: r7 NOTE: f requested by City, the Bidder shall furnish a notarized financial statement, references, and other information, sufficiently comprehensive to permit an appraisal of his current financial condition. E -1 1-2,7 PROPOSAL • SUBCONTRACTORS In compliance with the provisions of the Government Code Section 4102, the undersigned bidder herewith sets forth the name and location of the place of business of each sub - contractor who will perform work or labor or render C service to the general contractor in or about the construction of the work or Improvement in an amount in excess of one -half of one percent (1 /2%) of the general contractors total bid, and the portion of the work which will be done by each sub - contractor as follows: L Place of Subcontractor's Name Business Description of (Address 6 Phone) Work 4�a�l f C L C E -2 170 PROPOSAL I CERTIFICATION OF NON- OISCRIMICATION OY CONTRACTORS As Suppliers Of goods or servtL-s to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the firm listed below certifies that It does not discriminate in its employment w th regard to age /handicap, race, color, religion, sex or •rational origin, that it is in complianceeg with all federal, state and local �'rectives and executive demonstraterPositivelytandiaggressivelyetheopr�intir .a ^dafhequal opportunity to employment. We agree specifically: 1. To establish or observe employment policies rhtch affirmatively promote ooportunities for minority persons at all job levels. 2. To Comunitate this policy to all persons concerned, including all company employees, outside recruiting services, especially those serving minority a„u. communities, and to the >xrprity Communities at large. 3. To take affirmative steps to hire minurity employees within the firm. FIRM M�4'HL'itia_...� [ . � Please induce any additional information available regarding equal Opportunity employment programs now in effect within your firm. E -3 17g ,i %ROP0SAL NOII- COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT - ( (This affidavit shall be executed by all bidders at the time of bid opening. Failure to complete the form may constitute the bidder being judged non responsive and hav4ng his bid rejected.) C ( C To the City of Rancho Cucamonga: The undersigned bidder is submitting a bid for performing the following work by contract, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That the undersigned bidder has not, either directly or indirectly, entered into any agreement, participated in any collusion, or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive bidding in connection with such contract. oy Title Individual, _ Partnersh4p Corporation _ Other, explain C •SIGNATURES OF CONTRACTOR MUST JE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC. PLEASE ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACKMOLLEOGSM FORMS (INDIVIDUAL., PARTNERSHIP, CORPORATION, ETC.) E -4 Tom, PROPOSAL 410 BOND t KNOW ALL HEN BY THESE PRESENTS, ~ THAT and as Principals, fine y oune unto as urety, are held and hereinafter called the City, in the sum of :l TY OF SAN BERNARDINO, (.ot ess *. an en ee iota amount o t e dollars, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, Jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, said Principal has submitted a bid to said City to perform all work required under the Contract Documents entitled: STREET IMPROVEMENTS CHINA ALLEY NOk, THEREFORE, if said PWipal is awarded a contract by said City and, Zj witi,in the time and in the manner required under the headings "Instructions to Bidders" and "Bidding Schedule" bound with said Specifications, enters into a written contract on the form of agreement bound with said Specifications and furnishes the required bonds, one to guarantee faithful performance and the other to guarantee payment for labor and materials, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. In the event suit is brought upon this bond by said City and Judgement is recovered, said surety shall pay all costs incurred by said City in such suit. Including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the court. SIGNED AND SEALED, this _ day of 19 Business Name of er (Principal)' (Seal) Business Name of u (Seal) rety By: By: Title gnature gnature _ Title Individual Partnership f — �", Corporation _ Other, explain r� "SIGNATURES OF BIDDER AND SURETY MOST BE ACKNOWLEDGED BEF(RE A NOTARY PUBLIC. PLEASE ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACSMOWLEOGEMEAT FORMS (INDIVIDUAL, PARTNERSHIP, COPRORATION, ETC.). E,5 /9/ AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the following agreement is made and entered into, in tri,licate, as of the date executed by the City Clerk and the Mayor, by and between referred to as the -CO an t e ty o anc o ucamonga, California, hereinafter referred to as •CITY.• WHEREAS, pursuant to Notice Inviting Sealed Bids or Proposals, bids were received, publicly opened, and declared on the date specified in said notice; and WHEREAS, City did accept the bid of Contractor and WHEREAS. City has authorized the City Clerk and Na,or to enter into a for writt construction with ofCont the.ltbtrth for Side furnishing labor. Blvd (China '=+x NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed: 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: Contractor shall furnish all necessary labor, construction of the pNorthcsideaof Foothill iBlvd.a(China tAlly). for Saidhwork to be performed to accordance with specifications and standards on file in the office of the City Engineer and in accordance with bid prices hereinafter mentioned and in accordance with the instruction of the City Engineer. 2. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLEMENTARY: The aforesaid hereof iwith like rforceoand reffeeteas �f all eo frsa lr •acumen is were made a forth to full herein. Said documents, the Resolution Inviting Bids attached hereto, together with this written agreement, shall ccnstitute the contract between the parties. This contract is intended to require a complete and finished piece of work and anything necessary to complete the work properly and in accordance with the law and lawful governmental regulations shall be performed by the Contractor whether set out specifically in the contract or not. Should It be ascertained that any inconsistency exists between the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, the provisions of this written agreement shall control. 3. TERMS OF CONTRACT: A. The undersigned bidder agrees to execute the contract within ten (10) working days from the date of notice of award of the contract or upon notice by City after the 10 working days, and to Complete his portion of the work within Fourteen (14) working days from the date specified in the Notice to F -1 Proceed. The bidder agrees further to the assessment of liquidated damages In the amount of One Hundred ($100.00) dollars for each calendar day the work remains incomplete beyond the expiration of the completion date. City may deduct the amount thereof from any monies due or that may become due the Contractor under this contract. Progress paynents made after the schedul u date of completion shall not const .e a waiver of liquidated damages. 4. INSURANCE The Contractor shall not commence work under this contract until he as btafned all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to City nor shall the Contractor allow any subcontractor to cowence work an his subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. The Contractor shall take out and maintain at dll times during the life of this contract the following po'icfes of insurance: a. Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, the Contractor Shall furnish to the Engineer a certificate of insurance as proof that he has taken out full compensation insurance for all persons whom he may employ directly or through subcontractors in carryinji- out the workrrpecified herein, to accordance with the laws of the ° State of California. Such Insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the period covered by this contract. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, every contractor shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Contractor, prim to commencing work, shall sign and file with the City a certiffca. ion as follows: 'I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers compensation or to undertake self insurance to accordance with the provisions of that Code, and 1 will comply with such Provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract." b. For all operation of the Contractor or any subcontractor in Perforeing the work provided for herein, insurance with the following minimum limits and coverage: (1) Public Liability - Bodily injury (not auto) $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. (2) Public Liability - Property Damage (not auto) $250,000 each accident; $500,000 aggregate. (3) Contractor's Protective - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. (4) Contractor's Protective - Property Damage $250,000 each accident; $500,000 agg- egate. F- -2 (5) Automobile - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. (6) Automobile - Property Damage $250.ODD each accident. C. Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. shall: (1) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is qualified to do business in the State of California; (2) Name as additional insured th. City of Rancho Cucamonga, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, and any other parties specified in the bid documents to to so included; (3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that no Insurance held or owned by the designated additional Insureds shall be called upon to cover a loss under said policy; (4) Contain a claWsubstantially In the fo. lowing words: Y9. 'It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not w be canceled nor the amnt of the coverage th.•reof reduaad until thir v (30) days after receipt by City of a written notice of so-h cancellation or reduction of coverage as evidenced by ..ceipt of a registered letter.' (5) Otherwise be in form satisfactory to City. d. The Policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall contain an endorsement which: (1) halves all right of subrogation against all persons and entities specified in subparagraph 4.c.(2) hereof to be listed as additional insureds in the policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. by reason of Pny claim arising out of or connected with the operation. f Contractor or any subcontractor in perforaing the work provided for herein; (2) Provides it shali not be canceled or altered without thirty (30) days written notice thereof given to City by registered mail. e. The Contractor shall at the time of the execution of the contract Present the original policies of insurance required in paragraphs a. and b. hereof, or Present a certificate of the insurance company, showing the issuance of such insurance, and the additional insureds and other provisions required herein. F -3 /F7/ S. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions o a orn a Labor Lode, Division 2, Part 7 Chapter 1, .Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in Vie locality in which the public work 1s performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per them wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per dirm wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per them wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interestc.1 partv .,. -,quest. City also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to City, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such lauorer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. 6. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOYNENW. In accordance with the provisions of Section .5 o t e abor a 45 amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the Cal fornia Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprenr+ces may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions to Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen In any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program In that trade for a certificate of approval The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance or the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen n such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or b When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five. or c. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or F -4 /9S d. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices Or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. 7. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK: Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day s work or a workmen employed in the execution of this contract, and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the"IlSte of California having to do with working 14 hours set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to City, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. 8. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. 9. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and its elected officials, o cers, agents and employees shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, or for any of the materials or other things used or employed to performing the work; or for injury or damage to any person or persons, either workmen, employees of the Contractor or his subcontractors or the public, or for damage to adjoining or other property from any cause whatsoever arising out of or in connectinn with the performance of the work. The Contractor shall be resposible for any damage or injury to any person or property resulting from defects or obstructions or from any cause whatsoever, except the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, its employees, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City during the progress of the work or at any time before its completion and final acceptance. F -5 LI (O The Contractor will Indemnify City and its elected officials, officers, ' agents and employees against and will hold and save them harmless from any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or In connection with the work, operation, or activities of the Contractor, his agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees provided for herein, whether or not there Is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, but excluding such actions, claims, damages to persons cr croperty, penalitles, obligations, or liabilities arising from the site negligence or willful misconduct of City, Its employees, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City, and is connection therewith: a. The Contractor will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims, da=ges, penalties, obligations, or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, Including attorneys' fees Incurred in connection therewith. b. The Contractor will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the. Contractor ofWy, or its elected officials, officers, agents or employees, covering such claims, damages, penalties, ubligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with such work, operations, or activities of the Contractor hereunder, and the Contractor agrees to save and hold the saga harmless therefrom. c. In the event City, without fault, is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against the Contractor for damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of the Contractor hereunder, the Contractor agrees to pay to City any and all costs and expenses Incurred by City in such action or proceeding together with reasonable attorneys' fees. So much of the money due to the Contractor under and by virture of the contract as shall be considered necessary by City may be retained by City until disposition has been made of such actions or claims for damage as aforesaid. 10. NON - DISCRIMINATION: No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of the race, color, or religion of such persons, and every contractor for public works violating this section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the Labor Code in accordance with the provisions of Section 1735 of said Code. 11. CONTRACT PRICE AND PAYMENT: City shall pay to the Contractor for furnishing t e mater a, and-JO-TA—gthe prescribed work the unit prices set forth in accordance with Contractor's Proposal dated 810 DATE. F -6 /0., 12. ATTORNEYS' FEES: In the event that any action or proceeding is brought by e t er party to enforce any term or provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred with respect thereto. IN WITNESS IOIEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed with all the formalities required by law on the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures. State of California Contractor's icense No. ply YG � ate Tte ti to M CITY OF RANCHO COcANORGA, CALIFORNIA BY; V—way®r BY• ty erk ate Contractor's Business Rhone7/y. 30_9775— Emergency phone at which Contractor can be reached at any time •7 /v qz y. qj.a F -7 M, Bond No. 086 S 1002 401 42 Premium $164.00 CONTRACT FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND KNOB ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT OeArwond Conseructlon , as principal, and She Aetna Casuslev and Surety Company as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, in the just and full amount Of S Thirteen Thousand Six Hundred Port Seven and 90/100 XOrds (S ;3.641.90 1 gures paysent whereof we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Given under our hands andgrealed with our seal tnis 2nd day of April , 1986 I The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, WHEREAS, the above -named principal is about to enter into a contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga whereby said principal agrees to construct STREET INPROVEHENTS CHINA ALLEY in accordance with the AGREEMENT datad , which said contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof to the same extent as if the same were herein specifically set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said principal shall wall and truly do and perform all things agreed by the principal in said contract to be done and performed, then this obligation is to be void; otherwise it will remain in full force and effect; PROVIDED, that for value received the undersigned stipulate and agree that no amendment, change, extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract, or agreement, or of any feature or item or items of performance required G -1 /9"F CONTRACT FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND therein or thereunder shall in any manner affect the obligations of the undersigned under this bond, and the surety does hereby waive notice of such amendment, limitation of tide for bringing action on this bond by the City, change, extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract or agreement and of any feature cr time of performance required therein or thereunder. WITNESS our hands this 2nd day of April ig 96, TLy DeArmond Construction BUS IN ry FM-- [ t BY e, v itle by Title X Individual -- Partnership t Corporation _ Other, explain •SIGNATURES OF CONTRACTOR KIST BE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE A HOTART PUBLIC. PLEASE ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACKNOLEDGEI4ENT FORMS (INDIVIDUAL, PARTNERSHIP, CORPORATION, ETC.) The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company By. w Richard K. Roaskopf, Attorney.: Pep_. /90 `� IN Jnt1A GMNLTY AND AVMV CMIAWt ii E 1WOOrq[Wr[roYmll[ utwrwewtn POWEP OF AWOIWEY AND CD"VWAYE OF AUn*) TY OF ATMFWEVMf O FACT M...rt r. r. rtrrw.. arrr .r.Irar�Nttereerettr..rrr.ey twrU�.r��eK��wa�rW Lr rtt r rw Fef t.w.rrreenrtr rre 3 f tJ1J Y. P Z.O ju C, Lf. P.J�K P. LutW Of. Ibre1J Y.. Wp., A. CI•� A. Mn{V. JWe. Z. 3tIwIJ1j palrN 0. LIV7.1 K :rqn C. Ylt:. . ar ..,t=l Ctl lfomlt rw. rwrrrr rr.y.�erarrrer..rerrr.r..e �.rne.rre r rtrYrr Y Lbetr.r er.YM W� W F rW 4r� N rr Ynewrr..e N ar�.r rr..rrc Fron.r W Tr .er4r.rYY.lw_r1�er.l.it�YY.aer Yr�tr..ete.K.r N....art r.t rr4ne M •Tr CY1WnN0 }rin tnrrwn.orrrY Yr W rNr�.rlNw We YertFYY. •.....IrtTr MRIM W WInrOWrrYttYlYtrrY W r W IIYMyMgtw...rYMrrVt11M ee.. we.rr rr.frYrr TY.rprYrrYeerrerrrrgMY V. rrrr .�Irr.rr.Jeo..we.wtYer...erlrrr NM6 r�rr lYlwrrNwn W CeYerrrMrwe�rrYraFrw .FrJrrF��rFrYMreSr.YeFww.. .raYrrr �arM tnwtwlwnro7wnrL.rurtretr . rrrewrutvs r.+.e Yltf ife.14..t FKnas M�rYtwvtrnnmawlncwwrtrrrw.+r F.wtyrAftleUet trieet rb�er.r Wrr M.Y rareM 7e1� Mr April rPt S M ..VU Ane rn[rt tar.un % r{3/� rrtr.rre AU44 t Ice he ut` -- r rrr fw.rwr 7¢t �r LK4l r���e.�•r•+ee+rFrY J. L POrR :17 4Kf{e A. ferry. Jr. .5 tumors lYrw7..L tKUUft rMlI1MfAWYnt10)UYn[OIMI . errrrnYnrY rwr4�OrtPP.aratYlLmrbYtr.rYe W..fYtle.rr {Yn.e W ^M)er.I WF.r..r'�YYr W ererrw.rr.tr V�eMYt•6er� +..r9nYW rOna.4r.r4�FNfiYerrlYlewew� rrwe / q/ L Bond No. /86 S 1002 401 42 C O N T R A C T Premium Included LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND .. KNOW ALL M°_li BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT DeArmond construction . as principal, and The Aetna casualty and Surety company , as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, In the just and full amount of Six Thousand ESRht Hundred 'Twenty Three Dollars and 95!100 (6,823.95) words for the payment whereof we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Give under our hands and sMed with our seals thin 2nd day of April , =a 19 e6. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, WHEREAS, the above -named principal is about to enter into a contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga whereby said principal agrees to construct STREET IMPROVEMENTS CHINA ALLEY in accordance with the AGREEMENT dated 1S , as provided in said contract, which said contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof to the same extent as if the same were herein specifically set forth; L NOV. THEREFORE, if the said principal or principal's subcontractors fail to pay for any materials, provisions, supplies or equipment used in, upon, for or about the performance of said work contracted to be done, or for any work or L labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with resoect to such work or labor, the surety will pay for the same in an amount not exceed the sum hereinabove specified, and in case suit is brought L G -3 J9Q- CONTRACT LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND hereon, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court, otherwise this bond shall be void and of no effect; PROVIDED, that no amendment, change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to said contract, or agreement, or of any feature or item/items of performance required therein or thereunder shall in any manner affect the obligation of the undersigned on or under this bond; and the surety does hereby wa4ve notice of such amendment, limitation of time for bringing action on this bond by the City, change extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract or agremment and of any feature or Item or items of performance required herein or thereunder. This bond shall insure to the benefit of any and all persons entitled to file claims under Section 3181 of the Civil Code of the State of California, and shall give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. "O,+ WITNESS our hands this Ind day of April 1986 D ffi d Con WetIon BUSINESS NAME MW et to r7.. by Title C K Individual Partnership Corporation Other, explain •SIGPATIIRES OF CONTRACTOR MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC. PLEASE ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORKS (INDIVIDUAL, PARTNERSHIP, CORPORATION, ETC.). The As a Casualty an urety Cnmpany By: t Af Richard K. Rosekopf, Attorney-9-F1614 /9.3 METM RINA CASLIAtTr AM SLAMM Cd/Alry ME Iwuaal+ ---cons w•wutrt POWER OF ATTOPOW AND CBMWATE OF AUMOMY OF ATTOMIEYISHWACr Yr c.-mw u. vClcdl.l r Me•>err, m A7=' 7r. C '" pr r,`= a "" Jd 1. U1.1 di r VnhmlH C. Uryd a•• r pv¢mnYl CI1rOTla \PrWIr.wNrrgrwlq . rur.PrWYePrrwrPr..w Y•Pa�Y irI •ywr.Y• P Y7 tt�.rPYIYYarr�4 i YrrY�i• W Y W 1 �I..Y M MYr.J•Yi Y r�i wwwi t11YiPPMArrw'r W qa1 W rrr�•aY.•w.aerrYr.rn W M•.•aRrirrr.Ynnwr•tPr .�wr.na P ri.••r•.t.r.w.� r wW a �� •er wnY W YIPi M .(IY4PYLM1NORIIYTtLtrYX.•yw M Ml/ W I• Y P..r PYPY /Y Ynlw. Ta Y Y A.. � WrarYUar MIrM4W4T' MOMM1@' NN (I,WiYOrW.YNrrYMgprPYYYJYrIrPr r� Ia Yrti rWri W tYiPrt 1MNPYPYIr YaaPY W Mwyr YYWYyiaMtlW WIPrr W ui.�.�rrpY•in• P•wwYYw• W ✓fs a.Y�1rr r�tiPMNwwPWGYPPa1YwPh���iWWYY Lr�YWY�MµrYMa��trYtlrwrW .Pr •/ Y Wrir OPeP a1M 411M W WM1 MOgNi1l111rMY ro •Y•�w•...PM rP Mr M4. Vic. f nid..t .M.ilM 4AWTINprttM14Y /MrW WFrwwiY 341t. PA•altta•t •wr 1pt11 Tt ua taro Am aunr oorgt .l rrir rt...w J. T. W �Ywri Mt1•u•t lc• In ut a.+rrvw George A. real. Jr. tY• satr•un arllf.f MrY1MlT 'NOt1.MYfLrNlt.•YY�rN•rrrY WYrr. POgtOlfl�rtYIY1 .1rY>•Tt \WrWrllarra•�rr.Weft i.YraW�•YYYW W Yr•P.n.r.�MY� \YYr1 Wrr Y• Y• IY�trIY •sP4..YY�rNR•y.ww YY� MiWi� .iPYlrw•ORPJYt�•N.4Y4ra1M�4YY wAYiY 2nd eorI 4rll •R86 �� f Jw v. wearla, sanun -- RMM>M /Y� IMRR W a 4II WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSt4ZANCE CERTIFICATE The Contractor shall execute the following form as required by the California Labor Code. Sections 1860 and 1861: 1 am aware of the provisinnq of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers compensation or to undertake self - insurance to accordance theeperformancelof� they work Of this contract. Date• y�.�y� � T ontractor taignature) cn avc to C Attest: By Tom. gnature to t E L L G -5 /aS •• t 4/2/86_ — ROSSKOPF, RAPP 6 SCHMIDT P. 0. BOX N/ an KE2RtA61M - -- _ - -- 611460 — M4126 . Industrial Indemnity Company _ Aetna Casualty 6 surety Company De Armond Construction ' 10491 Calabash Fontana, Ca 92335 - > •••f 9 l i •�• �' GU _e�l." •C .I.• .; LC I•• > \I 'S•l W f .Ca .r � .1 c- JyefO• • SU.'CB U+.Ca .(+, nr 1 {iS0 . iC A•.. Jt Y" .eta s!f• Y`'t l r\ n M . 0'a -r ♦ v%ti1 :•]SO.adSYR.L..,. CC •O a •.• � ^iv7 7 n)_Mr C A x j X X x -- - -- x x BC 889 86 87 4/1/86 4/1/87 •" 1,000 1,000 X-- -._ _— X1.000 M .X ira�rY BC 889 86 87 .• 4/1186 .`A^ ' 4/1/67 r. n � ,.+ f =1.000 U•VQIJ IyH ANO B _ j =�__ •• r• •• ••mow,ns w:.un 86 CK 005202 CPA i tv2 Ogr\n 2/4/86 2/4/87 — i - otu � , '•• Project: Improvement of the North SId4 of Foothill e Blvd. (China Alloy) y_ +} City of Rancho Cucamonga o Lo i ^ -ni}save OLStlUCIa OO JCIIS [S CSACCttkO M,MMmrr ! P.O. Box 807 �,'i'v' ° "aor, iMt + -fmna cous.er wnt xRxX7D00DIX °'*.•!,+ Rancho Cucamonga, CaOf. 97730 0 "JOM .tarrra a ».• e2nnACali MClO[R w+xo ro ttf < ^ �r _ tti uwny M,wMM aeMw bdw pMrwsd Y n w ,Fw dwwanA MI WILM DO G11s tool ADDITIO11l IASUAfD tarn w twbn) TM.WttwMn sdvf uis I W* n b.f *d M W wnoaw of W oddT W11M U W Idbnp COWKI Daal Boom 111111117 r1W"" AWrLCTWtAP dN CWIUVW U&SI 7 1111//1111 TW 466n iy effect" a-2 -e6 , 1w s cwt d Wq 1> BCS898687 OZAIL .d. l wl owl to DeArmond Construction h Industrial indemnity Company U a.D.d WE I.TM -Fl w Inwd' Aw� U Mww Is wMe n as Iwwd W wopmatru w bdwbw WT go M"dto YWry ini t IAd OMydra Mduwt to WA Iw W M a a Will d W WW W.nt L TM uOubM IaA of W mpM s Mid# Iw W tram dtw[d ~ W CmOdfid UW4 Uuwrun CmW hd W wal S but d Oa Swp" M ROW h Say mud Hd n Cryn"W an 7 tad w kw of Won wgrubr Maw 1Wa Air d? vOaWMfr City of Rancho Cucamonga, Its elected officials, officers, agents and cmploy.fes, P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucomonga, Calif. 91730 J �� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 1, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 0. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Shinto Bose, Senior Civil Engineer 4�. SUBJECT: CONTRACT CHANGE CQr- FOR ENGINEERING SERVICCS BY HILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR BEV•_u,�J417 OF PHYSICAL MODEL OF PEAK REDUCTION FACILITIES FOR THE c ;rot DESIGN OF DAY CREEK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT The design of Day Creek Channel has a provision to reduce the peak +1 . by directing the excess flaw to Day Basin located at the southwest ornrr c. Highland Avenue and Day Crew, The peak reduction will facili ..r in dnwnslzing the channel downstr€am of the basin for cost effective desiggn Due to the complexity of designing a facility which will divert high velociy flow Assoc atescto develon designicriteriaoand guidelines .isTheprequirementlofaa model study has also been verified by an independent expert under contract with the City. The model will be constructed to test the peak reduction fa :ilities under simulated conditions and through iteration process the most cost effective design will be achieved. The design services for the modeling are in addition to the original design ay ^eement with Milidan Associates .f Anaheim, California, dated June S. 1985. This Contract Change Order will increase the original contract price by $100,000.00. The contract price, tnerefore, will increase from $367,000 to $467,000 with $120,000 in contingencies, and will be paid from bay Creek Fund (AD 84 -1.. RECOMMEX,DATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Contract Change Order for the additional design services by 11111dan associates for the additional amount of $100,000.00. j'u lly s bnt ed, ants ffizoda CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA unonvcutor ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CONTRACT F R • rder •- DESIGN FOP. DAY CREEK IHPROVEHENT PROJECT P 0, t 03139 rat- - . T0: g�neer -- You are hereby requested to Comply with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. 0 L iiiiiIO4 0 CNAN DE R- E ryCR �— Development of physical model for Day Creek in Contract Price In Contract Price Peak Reduction Facilities and cnndnct studies for cost effective design per enclosed proposal. $100.001.00 ItRI TOTAL $100,OOo.no OUSTIF 4UTION Due to the complexity of designing the system, the physical model is required to set up design parameters and guidelines. The amount df"the Contract will be QUddid(fdd) (Increased) by the sum of: QftLjLunorqd Ti _''sand and nn/'n --- ------- - - - - -- Dollsrs ($100x000.00 The Contract Total ircluding this and previous Change Orde•s will be:Four Hundred ��V CPVPn Ynousand and MOO- - Dollars (5467, The Contract period provided for completion will be (Ydiid&dd)(/dddWjjjdj (Unchanged) Days This document will become a supplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Requested: L.Oy uo s, C ty ng neer —' ate Accepted: enginee yr+ Approved: _ ayor, ty o an o ucamonga - Date 7I s in o�aa ton ri. a us as reco 0 �, agreement dated: June 5, 1985 anY an9es oiginal engineering T.} 1W WILLDAN ASSOCIATES O ENGINEERS & PLANNERS April 25, 1956 Mr Shintu Bose Engineering Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Subject: Day Creek Channel - Physical Model Proposal Dear Shinto: This latter Is In response to your review of our April 18, 1986 letter and our subsequent April 22nd meeting concerning the physical model of the peak reduction facilities at`211119 Creek Basin Per your request. via have developed a definitive program for the model - Ing In line with our discussions and the consensus reached at the meet - Ing. It was agreed that we would proceed with the contract arrangements with Tetra Tech for the weir and basin Inlet structure as proposed In their April 16 proposal to Willdan. Also, In place of the extensive model- ing proposed for the outlet spillway we have negotiated a low -cost, sim- plified demonstration of the interface between the flow downstream of the spillway and the main channel flow. This activity Is expected to show If there might be serious adverse flow conditions created In the main chan- nel during s,,lllway flow. This simplified exhibit, however, would likely have to be expanded to establish mitigation measures If the observed flow characteristics are unacceptable. The level of detall required and costs can be defined later If necessary. Therefore, to recap some of the points of our April 18 [attar proposal, I have summarized the pertinent Items for clarity. 1. Willdan will retain Tetra Tech for the physical modeling in accordance with their April 16 proposal from which Alter- nate 2, the outlet spillway, will be deleted. In place of Al- ternate 2, Tetra Tech will provide a simplified demon- stration of the flow intarfaca. 2. Dr. Mostafa, as a consultant to Willdan, will supervise the modeling procedure and testing. 3. The time schedule prepared by Tetra Tech Indicates a peri- od of 12 weeks for the base modal and 4 weeks for the inlet rj 290 S. ANAHEIM BOULEVARD • SUITE 100 • ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92805• (714) 774.5740• (213) 924.1631 Mr. Shinty Bose City of Rancho Cucamonga April 25, 1986 Page 2 structure WIIId,in will monitor the model progress to help assure compliance with the schedule 4 The modeling of the basin Inflow structure, Alternate 1, has been Included for cost officlency Into the modeling pro- gram. As final design of this structure Is tha rosponsibil- Ity of Boyle Engineering, they will be expected to furnish the required detailed layout of this element of the model to Wllldan. Tetra Tech will construct the scaled model from this layout. 5 After the modeling is complete, a detailed summary report will be distributed It will contain sufficient detail to es- tablish tt]Uarameters necessary to develop the subsequent ?� construction plans for the facilities modeled G. The City's total cost for the model analysis will be $100,000 as aefined provlously and tabulated below: Base Model $ 81,23G Basin Inflow 17,112 Flow Interface Demonstration 1.852 Fixed Fee $100,000 We suggest that this cost be processed as a change order to our present contract for Day Creek - Final Design, Purchare Order No. 03139. We request that a 50 percent progress payment be processed upon completion of the model construction when testing begins and an 85 percent progress payment upon receipt of the draft final summary report. This is also our arrangement with Tetra Tech. We are ready to start Immediately and will Issue Tetra Tech a notice to proceed upon your authorization. Very truly yours, Robert Merrell Project Director cc: Mr. Ruben Mantes, San Bernardino County Flood Control District ao/ •; �-1r1� WILLDAN ASSOCIATES ❑ ENGINEERS &PLANNERS Anril 18, 1986 Mr Rubon San Bar, Ie unty FI trict 825 Street San 8 ardino, California 92415.0835 Subject: Day Creek Channel - Ph•+sical Modeling in Connection with Day Creek Basin Des, Ruben: ."�" ?s We are pleased to hear that a decision has been made to use a physical model for the final design of the peak reduction facilities at Day Creek Basin. I am confidant that the procedure will prove to be a cost- offective approach to the design of this complex element of the Day Creek project. Dr. Raichlen's Independent review of the Day Creek Peak Reduction Fa- cility Study prepared by our firm was appropriato due to the complexity of the subject. It Is our understanding that you are considering, at Dr Raichlen's suggestion, that physical models also be developed for the side channel outlet Into the basin and the outlet overflow spillway Dr. Moccafa has Indicated to me that either of these structures, particularly the outlet spillway, can be designed and constructed without experimental analysis. In the case of the outlet Into the basin, the physical model will provide a vualltative simulation of the structure operating under design conditions and may help define the most cost - effective combination of structural con- crete and rock protection. The model Is not expected, however, to pro- vide data which would change the layout concept of the structure. Therefore, to model or not Is optional from a technical standpoint; howev- er, it may be cost effective. In the case of the outlet overflow spillway, It is Dr. Mostafa's opinion that the serviceability of the spillway would not be materially enhanced through the physical modeling process He Is confident that the spillway, as envisioned, will pass the overflow from the basin to the channel In a %asonabla manner. The physical model would only provide a damon- stration of this fact. Therefore, we feal that the spillway model Is not 290S. ANAHEIM BOULEVARD- SUITE 100•ANAHEIM. CALIFORNIA 92805- (714)774.5740•(213)924 -1631 Mr. Ruben Mantes San Bernardino County Flood Control District April 18, 1986 Page 2 warranted from a technical or cost - savings standpoint but may have a qualitative Illustration value As we have indicated to you In our earlier correspondence, wa Intend to subcontract with Tetra Tech, Inc to provide the hydraulic laboratory fa- cilities and staff needed to undertake the physical modeling of the Day Creek Basin peak reduction facilities with Dr Mostafa designated as the Model Supervisor for the assignment. The criteria, which we believe should be considared in selecting a hydraulics labnratory to perform the prescribed work, are: The laboratory Is located within a reasonable driving dis- tance of Willdan's offices and the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County f San Bernardino. Travel distance and time Is an Import factor because of the need for us to supervise the work. It Is also desirable that the City and County staffs have ready access to the facility so that they can periodically monitor the progress of the work and ob- serve the testing at various times A driving distance of approximately I hour In one direction Is considered to be reasonable • An indoor laboratory space of sufficient size to accommodate a physical model at a scale not less than 1' a 30'. Equipment can be made available to produce the required flows with flow measuring devices readily available The facility Is available at the times needed to most the schedule for the project. The laboratory staff have experience In conducting open channel hydraulic models. The laboratory Is able to demonstrate the availability of sufficient work force to accommodate the demands of the Day Creek project without conflicting with other assign - monts under contract to ths laboratory. Tetra Tech, Inc masts all the above criteria. In addition, since our firm Is taking responsibility fcr the hydraulic modeling work, we must also have a great deal of confidence in the capabilities of the tasting laborato- ry. We have worked with Tetra Tech before end, therefore, are confi- dent they can perform on the Day Creek project. X03 Mr. Ruben Mantes San Bernardino County Flood Control District April 18, 1986 Page 3 As you are aware, there are very few commercial hydraulic laboratories In California equipped with test facilities applicable to the Day Crook model - Ing project. In addition to Tetra Tech, there Is a laboratory located In the Bay Area: and we recently became aware of the Offshore Technology Corporation facility located In Escondido. The latter laboratory speciai- Izes in ocean technology and currently cannot moo, the above criteria Enclosed for your consideration Is a new proposal from our selected sub. consultant for the physical modeling. The proposal Identifies the model for the weir and Its componants as the base model with the side channel outlet and the outflow spillway deslgnated as additional options with foas for each Or Mostafa's fees have been separated from the modeling cost. As In the past, they will be treated as a cost Item to Wllldan. The fol- lowing tabulation Illustra%ss ho proposed total cost of the model analysis. Item Tatra Tech Dr. Mostafa Wllldan Total Base Model $62,000 $ 8,640 $10,596 $ 81,236 Basin Inflow 12, 000 2,880 2,232 17,112 Basin Outflow 30,000 2,880 4,932 37,812 Total $136,160 Tetra Tech has confirmed that they have the space and staff available to start on the assignment Immediately upon our authorization Likewise, Dr. Mostafa and our staff are prepared to Immediately start upon your approval. Please call me if you need any clarification regarding our proposal for the hydraulic modeling as presented heroin. Very truly yours, Robert Merrell Project Director RM:tdm Enclosure cc: Mr. Lloyd Hubbs, City of Ran_ho Cucamonga ,;Q r a� r ,t t�„ Mr. Robert Merrell Project Director Willdan Associates 290 S. Anaheim Blvd.. Suite 100 Anaheim, CA 92805 16 April 1986 Subject: Proposal to Conduct Hydraulic Model Testing for Day Creek, Revision 1 (P- 23282) Reference: 1) Tetra Tech letter proposal of 28 February 1986 to WiIIdan Assoc -06s. -aa 2) Wiildan Associates DWG. DAY CREEK BASIN PEAK REDUCTION rACILITY dated February 1986. Bear Mr. Merrell! Pursant to our meeting at your offices of 15 April 1986, we offer this revised p ",onsal on the above referenced subject. In accordance with directir ern you in our meeting, we have added two elective alternates to the b, ( mdel to qualitatively examine 1) the side channel outlet structure, energy dissipater, and affected area of the stilling basin and " the Overflow Basin Spillway and its effect on the flow in the main chan- nel. We look forward to working with you and Dr. Mostafa on this very Interesting project, and have our staff and faculties prepared to begin Immediately. The following is cur detailed proposal. I. SCOPE OF WORK A. Base Model la. Model Construction We propose to construction the model at a scale of 1:30 at our indoor facility located at Altadena, Californi.. The model will cover three main elements: Ja Portion of the main inlet channel, D The contracted side Wier section, and c The box culvert /side channel section EM Mr. Robert Merrell 16 April 1986 Page 2 The total length of the reach of the base model is approximately 1500 feet. The Wier and box culvert sections will oe constructed using plexiglass to allow for visual observations of the flow conditions and ensure reasonable friction modeling. The rest of the model will be constructed using smooth painted wood sections. Shop drawings of the model will be provided to Willdan for approval prior to actual model construction. 2a. Model runs Model tests will be performed on the derived theoretical design, ind two design modifications for the o%erflow Wier section and side channel. For each run, the design discharge will be tested and the measurements listed below will be conducted. v 3a. Test Measurements and Observations (a) Disct.arge measurements will be taken at three locations, the Inlet, the outlet of the box culvert and the outlet of the main channel. (b) Waves and disturbances within the side wier section will be photographed and their amplitude will be measured. Every reasonable effort will be made to reduce entrance disturb- ances to the main channel inlet by using a mixture of manifold and screens in the model head tank. 4a. Reporting The test program will be conducted in close cooperation and super- vision of Dr. Mostafa who will recamend needed design modifica- tions for the optional runs. Due to time limitations, it is expected that these modifications will be available to Tetra Tech upon completion of the first run. The results of the base model test will be reported to a draft interim report which will be due three (3) months from the NTP. B. Additive Alternate 1 (Side Channel Outlet Struc 1 lb. A model of the outlet structure and a portion of tie stilling basin impacted by the side channel discharge will be modeled after final design modifications to the side Wier and side channel are selected. The outlet structure at energy dissipater (design supplied to Tetra Tech by others) wr 11 be modeled to geometric Mr. Robert Merrel 16 April 1986 Page 3 similitude with ptexlglass materials. The affect of the discharge on the stilling basin bed will be qualitatively simulated with a fine sand moveable bed material. Still water levels within the stilling basin will be adjustable. 2b. Model Rur.s Model tests will he performed on the provided outlet structure design under a combination of two discharge conditions and three basin still water levels. The selection of specific test con- ditions will be determined with close coordination with Milldan. 3b. Measurements and Observations 1) Discharge measurements of flow through the outlet structure will be determined by measurements of flow supplied to the win channel and the performance characteristics of the side Wier and side channel..Wo mined through the base tests. it) Observations if the exit flow, location of hydraulic jumps, and pattern and xtent of scour patterns will be documented with still photgraphs, VHS videotape, and sketches. No quantitative measurements of bed scour is proposed. 4b. Reporting The results of Additive Alternate 1 model testing rill be prepared and submitted within 3 ra-.ort within three weeks of final testing. C. Additive Alternate 2 (Spillway) Ic. Model Construction A 1:30 scale irodel of the proposed spillway s!ction and the affected portion of the main channel will be modeled (Ref. DWG) with wood and 4lexiglass materials. The purpose of this model will be to qualatatively demonstrate the flooding and cross -wave pat- terns caused by the flow from the spillway impinging on the main channel. 2c. Model Runs Model tests will be performed on the proposed spillway and affected portion of the rain channel with about six combinations of dif- ferent main channel and spillway discharges. "t. Mr. Robert Merrel 16 April 1986 Page 4 3c. Test Measurements and Observations Discharge measurements will be taken of the flow supplied to the main channel and spillway. Observations of the cross -wave patterns and flooding of the main channel will be recorded with still photo- graphs, VHS videotape, and sketches. 4c. Reporting The results of Additive Alternate 2 testing will be prepared and submitted in a report within three weeks of final testing. II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE The proposed model testing and report schedule is given in Attachement 1. III. PROPOSED TEAM Vyr inx This study will be conducted by the following Tetra Tech key technical staff. Dr. A. L. Kadib Project Director A. Shak, P.E. Project Engineer J. Heckmann, P.E. Model Senior Engineer G. Borbora. P.E. Engineer M. Stephens Senior Technician 1V. COMPENSATION Tetra Tech, Inc. proposes to perform this study, as described in this pro- posal on a firm -fixed price basis as follows: Price A. Base Study $62,000.00 B. Additive Alternate 1 12.000.00 C. Additive Alternate 2 30,000.00 Included in this price are all labor, materials, and facilities cost necL sary to perform the proposed score of services, including storage of the model set -up for a period of sixty (60 days) after submittal of the draft final report. Costs for additional services beyond the scope of this proposal will be accumulated on a "Time- and - Material:" basis in accordance with Exhibit A. I Mr. Robert Merrel 16 April 1986 Page 5 We recognize the importance of timing on this project, and as stated in our previous proposal, would agree to a late charge for delays beyond the prescribed 90-day period for the base model testing. Tetra Tech would be willing to accept such a charge for delays caused by Tetra Tech, but would expect a day for day extension for delays caused by Willdan, any governmen- tal agency, Acts of God, or for any other cause not directly attributable to Tetra Tech. We hope that this proposal meets your requirements and should there be any questions or further clarifications, please don't hesitate to call me at (818) 449 -6400. Sincerely, TETRA TECH, INC. A. L. Kadib, Ph.D., P.E. Director of the hydraulic and Coastal Engineering Group ALK:dic ATTACHMENTS cc: Dr. Mestafa ATTACHMENT 1 PROJECT SCHEDULE (P- 23282) X16 1 i WEEK SK 10 11 17 is BASE MODEL START % PLANNING d DESIGN IXx% MODEL CONSTRUCT XXX X %X % %X %XX Secure Materials Ix% Machine Side Wier I %%xxx Install Head Tank xx%>I Building Framing xxX xx % Assemble Model X%x X %X CALIBRATION XX IST TEST x DESIGN CHANGES xx CONSTRUCT 2ND ALT. x xx 2ND TEST x DESIGN CHANGES %X CONSTRUCT 3RD A.LT, C %x 3RD TEST x REPORT xxx x%x ADDITIVE ALT, 1 (to be performed within 4 weeks after compietion of base model testing) ADDITIVE ALT. 2 (to be performed within 8 weeks after completion of base model testing) X16 1 i EXHIBIT A •TETRA TECH, INC. _ STANDARD RATES SCHEDULE LABOR CATEGORY HOURLY BILLING RATE Director f 105.00 Chief Engineer /Scientist 98.00 Principal Engineer /Scientist 91.00 Senior Engineer / Scientist Level 2 85.00 Senior Engineer /Scientist Level 1 78.00 Engineer /Scientist Level 3 70.00 Engineer /Scientist Level 2 60.00 Engineer /Scientist Level 1/� -j _ Design Draftsman '� 50.00 Associate Engineer /Scientist 46.00 Technician Level 2 /Draftsman 40.00 Technician Level 1 35.00 Technical Aide 30.00 Clerical 38.00 1. Above rates apply to normal working hours. 2. Court time, weekends or evenings would be billed at 1 1/2 times the standard rate. 3. Emergency Response (within 24 hours of call) 2 times the standard rate. 4. All other costs such as travel, materials, supplies, etc., would be billed at actual cost plus 25%. 5. All time charged is portal to portal. 6. Rates for field equipment quoted upon request. 7. Storage of Physical Models: Indoor Basin 500.00 per week Outdoor Basin 350.00 per week Negotiable for periods greater than 10 weeks Rates are valid through 06- 3046. 3:LR- 1(4/86) ,;L// CITY OF RANCHO CUCA4_*ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1966 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 0. Hubts. City Enq!neer BY: Monte Prescher, Public horks E•+gineer SUBJECT: Approval and Execution of Contract Documents for the Improvment of the North Side of Foothill Boulevard from 440 Feet to 660 Feet Nest of San Bernardino Rcad (Ch''na Alley) betweem the City and DeArmond Cnstruction in the amount of $15,012 69 On April 2, 1986, City Council awarded the subject project to DeArmana Construction (Contractor). The Contractor has submitted executed agreements, bonds and insurance forms, for City approval and execution. RECOMMENDATION: It i, recommended that Council approve for execution by the Mayor and City Clerk, the contract Documents for the North Side of Foothll Boulevard from 440 feet to 660 feet Nest of San Bernardino Road ( China Alley) project in the amount of $15,012.59 ($13,647.90 plus IDS contingency) and authorize the Finance Department to make payments to contractor from the developers (China Alley) surety fund ($16,000.00) and systems development f nd if needed. Respectfully subaitt , *Mbc Attachments ai?' � trq 's CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a J Chain J. DKwt it W'" gag OTC Rkh rd 51. D.W P•m•143.71r1h1 O SPECIAL PROVISIONS � NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS G- JPROPGSAL AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS / G for RESIDENTIAL STREET REHABILITATION v 1985 -86 - PHASE I City Clerk LLOYD HUBDS City Engineer BIDS OPEN: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 , M� 7720 BA5EI.L•7E g0AD, SURE C. • P0970PPICE BOx 707 • BA,YCIIO CUfA710YGA. CALTORNIA 917]0 • ITI/I979•I171 -1, j NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY •- GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.N. on the 25th day of February, 1986, sealed bids or proposals for RESIDENTIAL STREET REHABILITATION, 1985 -86 (PHASE 1) in said City. Bids will be openeJ ano publicly read immediately in the office of the Cily Clerk, 9320 Base tine Road. Suite C, Rancho Cucaronga, California 91730. Biec -. c be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of RESIDENTIAL STREET REHABILITATION, 1Sp'•86 (PHASE I)• PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is F eby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Cone, Division 2, Part 1, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less thin the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character In the locality to which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. in that regard, the m< Director of the Departnt of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has deterow,"d such general prevailing rates of per diem wages Copies of such prevailing rates of per them wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are avihlable to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under hta, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, amid in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisons n Sections 1777.5 anJ 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontrac'r under him. Section 1777.3, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable cccupatinn to apply •.c the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program In that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will.be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not A -1 -D./V be less than one to five eccept: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in 'he 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or When the number of apprentices to training to the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or U. When the Contractor provides evidence tha: he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs " he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticetble trade on such contracts and if other Contractors an the p'iblic works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall -omply with the requirements of Sections 171� and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards wage schedul— and other requirements may be obtained from the Director u. Industrial d_lations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Cal forma, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Fight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2. Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -fi . dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by hin or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic Is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agree; to poy travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work requirtJ by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined to tf • applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.0. The bidde must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, paye.le to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten pe.cenL (10 %) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the hidder will enter into the proposed contract if the sc^w is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, A -2 016-- cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Ranchc Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, an' the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereu:, and an additional bond in an aw. -int equal to fifty percent (50 %) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment Of claims for any materials or scpplles furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, ,,r any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be regiired to furnish a certificate that he carries crsnpensation fnst' ante covering his employees upon work to he done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will he considered from a Contractor who is not lfcrnsed in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto or to whom a proposal form has not been issued by their City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1131' The •tirk is to be done in accordance with the profile:, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on wile in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Gass Line Road, Rancho Cur• -_rga, CM;fornia. copies of the p ms and specifications will be furnished upon ap-lico 'on to the City of fancho ' ucamonga and payment of f 5.00 , said $ 5 00 is roiirefundable. s Upon written request by the bid•ier, copies of the plans and specifications w111 tie mailed when said request is accompanied by payron stipulated above, tG,1W !r with an additional nonreimbursable M,aent of . 5.00 to cover the ,rt7 cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be. required to enter into a contract satfs +actory to the Vtv of Ranchn Cucamonga. in accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth to the Plans and Specifications regarding the wo,•k contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's r auest and at the Contractor's sale cost and expense, substi.u'e authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld ( performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reser'•es the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califoinie. Dated this day of , 19 A -3 A .1 PROPOSAL SCHEDULE OF UNIT COST AND LUMP SUM AMOUNTS •_ RESIDENTIAL STREET REHABILITATION, 1985 -86 (PHASE I) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA: The undersigned bidder declares that he has carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that he has examined the plans, special provisions and specifications, and read the accompanying instruction to bidders, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this proposal is accepted, to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with the Plans, Special Provisions and Specifications, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost and lump sun amounts set forth to the schedule on the following Proposal. Item Estimated No. Quantity Description (Unit Price in Words Unit Price (In Figures) Total (In Figure-) 1 1,100 S.F. R Wpntching 4t :z,And CentS4.5n i 4.950.00 / per square 0 2 l,lin S.F. Skin patening at S •7.90 S 1.: 5.00 per square per square foo 3 26,900 L.F. Crack Sealing at C S00.41 S 11,OI9.00 / ✓ per nea r oot C -1 c;1// IPS SERVICES INCORPORATED er—' ■ PROPOSAL SCHEDULE OF UNIT COST AND LUMP SUM AMOUNTS •• RESIDENTIAL STREET REHABILITATION, 1985 -86 (PHASE I) 4 370 Tois Slurry Sealing at ..WIX Iiaht Dollars x d Sixty S ¢ncs f 58.68 f 21,)04.20 ,/ per Extra Long on TOTAL SUM OF BID (Words) Thirty SSoht Thoasard Seven Hundred / —ehtcen Dollars and Tvent7 Cents El $ 36.718 70 ✓ (Figures) C2 U IPS SFRVICES INCOP.POHA -EO didde --- I PROPOSAL DIDOER AGREEMENT The undersigned also agrees as follows: FIRST: Within 15 calendar days from the receipt of the Notice of Award of Contract, to execute the contract, and to furnish to the City of Rancho InvitingaBidsoguaranteeingctheyfaithfulnperformancesofl�thefworkiandhpayment of bills. SECOND: To begin work within 10 calendar days after the date specified in the Notice to Proceed and to prosecute said work in such a manner as to complete it within Fifteen (15) working days after such specified date. Accompanying this proposal 1s cash, a cashier's check, or a certified check of a bidders bond for not less than ten percent of the total amount of the bid payable to the City which is to be forfeited, as liquidated damages, if, in the event the contractor does not execute the contract and furn sh satisfactory bonds under the conditions and within the time specified in this pr000;al, otherwise said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's �r awardiofttheecontractdtheeCCiftyu will s return theLbidderscbond accompanying r such h proposal eldunl. o considered making award. other bidders ilthecontract hasbeenfinallyexecuted .Theywillthennbe returned to tf respective bidders whose proposals they accompany. BIVER: of corporation and names If the president, secretary,�treasurer, and emanager; copartnership, state true name of firm and names of all individual copartners composing firm; or an individual, state first and last names in full. Licensed in accordance with an act providing for the registration of Contractors, License No._ 4Zisze SIGN HERE act G. �� Title ` ,r c_ ei r eo " f ..a...�t ff ter Tit e — Da ratire and titl.• of the officer(s) set forth above shall be authorized to sign contracts on ar.half of the corporation, copartnership or individual. If slgnatur2 1s b% an agent, other than an officer of the corporation or a mcanber of a partnership, a Power of Attorrey mist be on file with the City prior to or at time of bid opening; otherwise the bid will be subject to rejecti m by City Coynsel. D -1 PROPOSAL BIDDER INFORMATION ,ne bidder still furnish the following information. additional sheets may be attached If necessary: NAME OF FIRM: US SERVICES INCORPORATED Type of Firm: Corporatlonz Individual_ Partnership Business Address: 1670 Seeaua Drive. Redlandn CA 92374 Place of Business 1670 Sessuas Drive. Redlands. CA 92374 Place of Residence Redlands, California Telephone: 714- 794 -2`201 Ti Contractor's license: State: 421528 License No. C 12 Names and titles of all members of the firm: Dennis C. RSeRar. President Edward y Lublch, Vice President Nancy F. Stevens. V P /Secretary Ray W. Myers, V.P /General Manager Number of years as a contractor to construction work of this type: 6 Three projects of this typ- recently completed: Contract Amount Type of Pro]ect Date I=pleted Owner's Na."ie S Addre. $110.000 Slurry Deal 1/14 a L.A. Cry. Dept of Pub. work -- 1540 61cazar. . CA 90033 $86.668.00 Slurry Seal 1/14 Ontario Airport. 2132 Avian ttreet. a r1o91 559.000 Slurry Seal 1/23/E6 City of Calaut 21201 -La Puente, ., .ialnut Person who inspected site of the proposed work for your firm: 9176 Name: Ray W. Mvers Date of Inspection: 2/20/86 NOTE: If requested by City, the Bidder shall furnish a notarized financial statement, references, and other information, sufficiently comprehensive to permit an appraisal of his current financiai condition. - E -1 • = i P R 0 P 0 S P L SUBCONTRACTORS In cor-plianco with the provisions of the Government Code Section 4102, the undersigned bidder herewith sets forth the name and location of the place of business of each sub - contractor who will perform wore ar labor or render service to the 0eneral contractor in nr about the construction of the work or Improvement in an amount in excess of une -half of one percent (1/2X) of the general contractor's total bid, and the portion of the work which will be done by each sub - contractor as follows: Place of Subcontractor's Name Busines_ Description of (Address & Phone) Work N/A E -2 al E -2 al PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION OF NON - DISCRIMINATION BY CONTRACTORS As suppliers of goods or services to the City of Rencho Cucamonga, the firm listed below certifies that it does not discriminate in its employment with regard to aqe /handicap, race, color, religion, sex or national origin, that it is in compliance with all federal, state and local directives and executive orders regarding non - discrimination in employment; and that it agrees to demonstrate positively and aggressively the principle of equal opportunity to employment. We agree specifically: 1. To establish or observe employment policies which affirmatively promote opportunities for minority persons at all job levels. 2. To communicate this p$SEy to all persons concerned, Including all companFr employees, outside recruiting services, especially those serving minority cormnities, and to the minority communities at large. 3. To take affirmative steps to hire minority employees within the firm. FIRM TPS S[R�11CRS INCORPoRATED TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING Rav W. Myers. v_P. /nea.ra M.n...r DATE Febrnary 25 1986 - Please include any additional information available regarding equal opportunity employment programs now to effect within your firm. E -3 PROPOSAL NON- COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (This affidavit shall be executed by all bidders at the time of bid opening. Failure to complete the form may const +wte the bidder being Judged non responsive and having his bid rejected.) To the City of Rancho Cucamonga: The undersigned bidder is submitting a bid for performing the following work by contract, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That enteredintoeany agre9ement, participated �ini any rcollusion ,00riotherwise� taken any action in restraint of free competitive bidding in connection Stith such contract. ICV S IPS SERVICES INCORPORATED Y -7�U b.Y2—a^ -. e b In ,i u .riT✓�.,T1tleership Ind viduai, Partnership State of CalLfornia as County of San Bernardino •e. On this 24th day of Feb , in the year 1986, before me Diane Grubb _, Notary PublLc personally appeared Dennis C. Risser, Pres. and Mane P. Steven• Sec. personally knov to me (or proved to on the hasis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(,) that executed this instrument, on behalf of the corporation therein named and aeknovledged to me that the corporation executed it J ornoa� sW, `,r X88 umna, .�r�°m"t.,.,vao. cairn a a3 Witbb bb /��� Diane Gru Notary Public in and for the county Of San Bernardino state of .California Ny emission expires July ), 1919 X AGREEMENT reWNl PRESENTS: e h i hitt made triplicate, ofth date execut dby the CCyClerkand the Mayor, by and between hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR4 and the City of ant o Cucamo nga, California, hereirafter referred to as 'CITY.• WHEREAS, pursuant to Notice Inviting Sealed Bids or Proposals, bids were received, publicl,, opened, and declared on the date specified in said notice; and iR1EREAS City did accept the bid of Contractor and WHEREAS, City has authorized the City Clerk and Mayor to enter into a written contract with Contr�q�t�or for furnishing labor, equipment, and material TFfy. for tr, construction of RES11®r L STREET REHABILITATION, 1985 -86 (PRASE I). HUw, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed: 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: Contractor shall furnish all necessary labor, tools, mater a s, app antes. and equipment for and do the work for the PROJECT TITLE. Said work to be performed in accordance with specifications and standards on file in the office of the City Engineer and in accordance with bid prices hereinafter mentioned and to accordance with the instruction Of the City Engineer. 2. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED CONPLEMENTARY: The aforesaid specificat oons are ncorporate here n y re erence thereto and made a part hereof with like force and effect as if all of said documents were set forth in full herein. Said documents, the Resolution Inviting Bids attached hereto, together with this written agreement, shall constitute the contract between the parties. This contract is intended to require a complete and finished piece of work and anything necessary to complete the work properly and in accordance with not. Should it be ascertained that any inconsistency exists oetween the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, the provisions of this written agreement shall control. 3. TERMS OF CONTRACT• A. The undersigned bidder agrees to execute the contract within ten (10) working days from the date of notice of award of the contract or upon notice by City after the 10 working nays, and to complete his portion of the work within Fifteen (15) working days from the date specified in the Notice to F -1 a,;L(/ 0 Proceed. The bidder agrees further to the assessment of liquidated damages -rn the amount of Two Hundred ($200.00) dollars for each calendar day the work remains incomplete beyond the expiration of the completion date. City may deduct the amount thereof from any monies due or that may become due the Contractor under this contract. Progress payments made after the scheduled date of comoletlon shall not constitute a waiver of liquidated damages. 4. INSURANCE The Contractor shall not commence work under this contract until he has obtained all insurance required hereunder to a company or companies acceptable to City nor shall the Contractor allow any subcontractor to commence work on his subcontract until all Insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. The Contractor shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this contract the following policies of insurance. a. Compensation Insurance: Before beginning worms, the Contractor shall furnish to the Engineer a certificate of insurance as proof that he has taken out full compensation insurance for- all persons whom he may employ directly or through subcowtractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance witr; the laws of the State of Califwyla. Such insurance shall be mainta;ned in full force and effecctt''during the period covered by this contract. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3100 of the California Labor Code, every contractor shall secure the payment Of compensation to his employees. Contractor, prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with the City It r.ertification as follows: "I am aware which f provisions f Section l h o requireeveryemployertobeinsur •edagainstliabilityfor worker's compensation or to undertake ;elf insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I (111 comply with such provisions before commencing the perforouance of the work of this contract." b. For all operation of the Contractor or any subcontractor in L performing the work provided for herein, insurance with the following minimum limits and coverages (1) Liability $500,000ea& person; $1,000,000 ach accident. (2) Public Liability - Property Damage (not auto) $250,000 each accident; $500,000 aggregate. (3) Contractor's Protective - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. (4) Contractor's Protective - Property Damage $250,000 each accident; $500,000 aggregate. F -2 ass X (5) Automobile • Bodily injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. (61 Automobile - Property Damage $250,000 each accident. c. Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. ahall: (1) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is qualified to do business in the State cf California; (2) Name as additional insured the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its elected officials, officers. agents and employees, and any other parties specified in the bid documents to be sr included; (3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or o -.ed by the designated additional insureds shall be called upon to cover a loss under said policy; (4) Contain a cTWe substantially in the following words: 'TV •It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be canceled nor the amount of the coveraoe thereof reduced until thirty (30) days after receipt by City of a written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage as evidenced by receipt of a registered letter.• (5) 0thrrwise be in form satisfactory to City. d. The policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall contain an endnrsement which: (1) Waives all right of subrogation against all persons and entities specified in subparagraph 4.c.(2) hereof to be listed as additional insureds in the policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. by reason of any claim arising out of or connected with the operations of Contractor or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herein; (2) Provides it shall not be canceled or altered without thirty (30) days written notice thereof given to City by registered mail. e. The Contractor shall at the time of the execution of the contract present the original policies of insurance required in paragraphs a. and b. hereof, or present a certificate of the insurance company, showing the issuance of such insurance, and the additional insu••eds and other provisions required herein. F -3 db X 5. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the Provisions o a orn a Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work Is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overttne work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per them wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per them wages are on file in the attics of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho-Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. City also shall cause a copy Of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to City, twenty -five dollars (S25.0) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day Port threof, if such laorer. the generalprevailing rate Of b wages hereinbeforemstipulated fordanysworkadone under tha attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor unuer him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. , 6. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOYMENT: In accordance with the provisions of a Section I the Labor ode as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in ,ccordance with the regulations of the California f)prenticeship Counci., properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5. as employing tradesme an n in anyapprenticeablatoccupation to apply bton the cjoint apprenticeship caaoittee nearest the site of the public works project and which admini.ters the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will ba used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of P ')•_notes to journeymen in such cases shall not be le e ept: ss than one to flue A. When unemployment In the area of coverage by the joint apPrenttcaship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the ^? days prior to the request for certificate, or b. When the number of apprentices In training hn _ area exceeds a ratic of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or F -4 as ;2 d. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight ,Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen to any apprenticeaole trade on such contracts and if other contractors on the public works site are making such contributions The Contractor and subcontractor under hlm.shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 to the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director at Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. 7. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK: Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal days work or a workmen employed in the execution of this contract, and the Contractor and any Jupcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of th tate of California having to do with working hours set forth to Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to City, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. 8. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTE14CE PAY: Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each wor man neede: to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined In the applicable collective bargaining agreeme is filed in accordance with .abor Code Section 1773.8. L 9. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY: The City of R officials, o leers, agents and employees shal accountable in any manner for any loss or dama or any part thereof, or for any of the materia employed in performing the work; or for injury persons, either workmen, employees of the Cant the public, or for damage to adjoining or othe whatsoever arising out of or in connection wit The Contractor shall be resposible for any dam property resulting from defects or obstruction except the sole negligence or willful miscondu servants, or independent contractors who are d during the progress of the work or at any time acceptance. FF -5 o'o`g ncho Cucamonga and its electad not be answerable or e that may happen to the work s o., other things used or or damage to any person or actor or his subcontractors or property from any cause the performance of the work. ge or injury to any person or or from any cause whatsoever, t of City, its employees, rectly responsible to City before its completion and fir•l 11 0 The Contractor will indemnify City and its elected officials, officers, ,nts and employees against and will hold and save them harmless from any and actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations, liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, ent'ty, -poration, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or in inection with the work, operation, or activities of the Contractor, his :its. employees, subcontractors, or invitees provided for herein, whether or there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of City, its .cted officials, officers, agents and employees, but excluding such actions, Am% damages to persons or property, penalities, obligations, or bilities arising from the sole negligence or wUlful mi° onduct of City, employees, servants, or independent contractors who ai erectly pansible to City, and in connection therewith: a. The Contractor will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims, damages, penalties, obligations, or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, Including attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith. b. The Contractur will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the Contractor of City, or its er2Wd officials, officers, agents or employees, covering such claims, damages, penalties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with such work, operations. or activities of the Contractor hereunder, and the Contractor agrees to save and hold the same harmless therefrom. c. In the event City, without fault, 15 made a party t0' any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against the Contractor for damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of the Contractor hereunder, the Contractor agrees to pay to City any and all costs and expenses incurred by City in such action or proceeding together with reasonable attorneys' fees. So mach of the money due to the Contractor under and by virture of the itract as shall be considered necessary by City may be retained by City Al disposition has been made of such actions or claims for damage as iresaid. 10. NON - DISCRIMINATION: Ito discrimination ,hall be made in the employment Persons upon pup c wor s because of the race, color, or religion of such Sons, and every contractor for public works violating this section is feet to all the penalties imposed for a violation of Division Z, Part 7, pter 1 of the Labor Code in accordance with the provisions of Section 1735 said Code. 11. C01ITRACT PRICE AND i'AYMENT: City shall pay to the Contractor for nishtng the material and du ng the prescribed M rk the unit prices set th in accordance with Contractor's Proposal dated BID DATE. F -6 4 .Y 12. ATTORNEYS' FEES: -In the evert that any action or proceeding is brought y e t.er party to enforce any term the prevailing party shall ar provision of this Agreement, recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred with respect thereto. IN WITNESS M REOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed with all the formalities reg0red by law on the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures. State of California Contractor's License 110._ 421514215118 - - -_ ate atS�— IRS SERVICES INCORPORATED 16:0 Sessuas Drive ' Redlands, CA 92374 ' My L I e k+p to CITY OF RANCNo COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BY' ayor BY: tY er Contractor's Business Phone 44'4 •sriai Emergency Phone at whiFFh Contractor can e reached at any time (7,V) gg3•Aisiu� F -7 CD.,3 0 �u i Band No 2050 -54- 054087 Musau Insunance Companies , IME With ORrnalwauaa,Wmaearm Any contwnduw In Millen to h bad wv ahMd ba ducted m: ,uu Inwanre caapamn w,t . Surety Undnrhiae 2000 Wawood Orhe • Wavau.Wgconon 54401 PERFORMANCE BOND KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS Thetwc IFS SE;VICES INC. (herelmlter Oiled "Principal") as Principal, and Mplpyg(S IRSMtNCE OF WAUSAU A MUP,.Ay CO�@A a wrporahon organized and existing 0401 the laws o(!ne Stateot W soci 9IN end authan2ad to traman business in the State of C LI URM (tun einafter abed "Slimly'), as Surety, are field firmly 1r.0sd unto CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA (hereinafter called "Obbgee°). as OMIW, in the penal sum of Thirty —e1Bht thaso and r Seven hundred a,Biltaear coil tt.essty cavte 'y _j Dollars (S 38/718.20soasc), Sood area lawful money of the Unted States of Ameraa, for she payment of which, wcil end truly to be made, wa bind aurselKS, our hens, adminatretors, executor, successors, and rmrgr; jointly and severally, hrmty by these presents, Vilned, Sealed and Dated this 18 day cr April 19 O i Mitten the above bounden Principal has encored into a sartam written arUact with Ua above -named Obligee, dated she day of .19 for contract rs hereby referred to an4nade a pan hereof as lully and to tnemmo extent wit copied at lergth hereLi. W. THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That it the above bounden Principal shalt well I troy Leap, do and pbrform, esch end ovary all and singular, the matters and things in said contract set forth rid specified to be the ad Principal kept, done and performed at the time and in the manner m said contract specified, and shall Pay aver, mate good I reimbuise to the above-named (jolgea all lost and damage which said Oblgee may sustain by reason of failure or default on the I of said Principal, then this obligation shall be void otherwise to be an.) remain in full force and effeeL M SFRVICFS INC_ /y��) �/jjfM,rbai {YNI - fl4PlAYI2i5 I181RAACF DP VItISA(L,L�,d��p2y by i33iw+7T�- by - aek ity oaxs'`iBMw .,�r.n , N9 I11Ta.1yaA O ¢t]2 $W Q H 2 H W 8 Irt V Zo 2Y Si ti LL 3� Q LL Q ti rn Er PLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU A Mutual Company POWER OFAITORNEY KNOW AI.1. MFN HY TID_,•: 1'I11_SRNI\ That the!MI'1.111' /:TLS INSf HANCEb! W'AUSADAMuluul Cumlunt, am•poration duly urean @td and existing and.r the laws m the.Nw, u( Wuu,.a and having it. pnnn DUl nOin In the City of Wausau. Courtly of ALrathoo, State of Ww,,n.in bu.+nude. nm.tnm• d and ul.. +ntnl, .md de.. hl thr.e prrern V make, ntutltv4 and aDpmnl - -- —. Jack 4 ItygppX m trvr and li vful ul4mwYmfu wish lull p.wnand awu.uav h,,.bv mAfrrndm ue name. Wan and eWed. W esteva. seat acknus, Wjiv and deliver A. Y OR AIJ. 11ONIN ONDENTAKINQS. HECOONIZANCES OR OTHER WRITTEN OSI.ICATION> IN THE NATUR TID:IO'IIF, NOT TO EXCEED THE PENAL SUN OF FIVE MILLION DOLLARS ($.:,000 amr'mna tnr a'rlwutuut thrn -hew w:; and In the un.walminuf.urh 6uda veresi"WhythefimldmludedvtN the mrpumV .avl ohhe nepimunun. ul nulY unntnl LY u..nnlary hereby mbfYin9 and nnfkntmg all that the suld sit-in" m bn .., du m the pnmun T%,. Wwvrufaltnrnq..granted DUr.ua, lulN LdwaaKrmlutmn adapted by the NoardofDitarlono / saW C.OmpinYala m. rung duly rolled and hl" the lKlh 'er,dblur 197 E chub rerJutumu.ull taeffnt. -HFSULVEN thn'he I'rt.nknlurd tv v.r l ' mulmt— tin -urr.n a4yumuv<— ofEMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAl1.SAlIAAlutu.'CumpunY le.mu rhutrurM•Oh,m hmhY la.authnnsed to saeruV powers of altomryaaalUyine lbalhunrr nem..l ... h. .... ........... r.....___.. .. _. IN uXn mnYthevinprrudmlend atintedl'vit4a..u4 m.,vyelury, and tb.wponaard bbeheretoa/fbedThu 2nd —day y February __ Iy 81 hh11'I.UYFR -4 %SVI(ANCr OF WAUSAU A Mutual Company IIY R II F.rw• , Vin Pasldmt �UF O I Auuant STAT N'1.CONS, t I.u. COUNT) O' MARATHON i On this XnU _ dnY "f _.._— February 19_F1 .prtoreiw praonAlynmr H O Fnrn�wwlh a u. me know .. who being by me duly awom. did de urd uythut he u n I,s�lutademnl ihr /dil'IU1'I:RY Ilia U11 A NL9: UFWAUSAU A life lual Com Dave Jir n4.lmanil rLu n..rmted tSr nlam m .ni no llwih.4m,, athr.mlufiuidnuponnon,Ihat Nesnlaffi. tomd itutrvuxntuwrh mq.vm.•iavl unit th.t tvua u. uhf a. rl Ly'.nler uOhr llwrd of DlrMOre Druid igponiton and NatM caned Au name Ihrna,. hY',kr antis IN WITNKCS WTI! I:hi IY wrnlm ml hand 1- 1111flad my ulfinal use] the day and I,... hrmn Oat above i OT'ANY PUBLIC 1 Notary PoMk Si ATE OF WISCONSIN fly COMM'S IUN IS PERMANENT STATF. OF WIStI INSIN r lLTHTII•V•ATK I'M OF WA I lSA 11 lu COUNTY OF MA1LtlT11 IN t 1. the undrr.aiut]. m.utam .nermry d h 111•IJ q'kKi INSURANCE OF brAUSAU A Mutual Casymny, • Wiacmaip rt.iuretwe d. hared nmfv 0,11 the 1 rem.nw and mlurned rywn .t uturnry U- 111CII MUST CONTAIN A VALIDATING 9CAThMY:NT 1'lllfiTF.O IN THE MAIL I;IN T11KKKOF III TIED INK. remuu in full fom and his natbnnrrruk.d ondfunhrrrm.rth.nihrrn du W.n,d the lhi rd aflhrntwa .nLVthmthrpawnalatiwneY b uu laforrs, Statist] and..Win ihr l'ur of W'u.u.a, blmatMm C.wnu rd.ne nfWwvwn. ihv dq 111 HmnH . AeatiantScrnq' NOTE. IF-YOU HAVE ANY @III \TIT INK t1EHAHIIINO TIlK VALIDITY OR WOJIVINO OF TIIIS POWER OF a. Pnwp.L hemrat [ter called Pnnclpal. and FTIPIAY -- TImIRe — OP MA SA A MJ L A 3130 WILSHIRE BLVD. LOS AT XLM, CA •• •••• p1 .17118 city o oft Da a+5umy,herc,aaaer oDed Surety, art heW and firmry DouM onto u ODlga. hnnn""e calk) Owner rar he a and Deaefit a of nmaets a nt herebelaw a Minne Pn�hwsand three hundred fl wnisa no of ti eG tnr a of for the Payment whereof Pnnnpal \Id suray btml themselves, their help, eaccutoes, Adm,muraton, \uZoesson and as.iSm, Jointly and for they, firmly bb the+e pre.ean. W NEREAS. Pnwpal has by lute, aST"Mal dated entered Into a ennIm" with Owner for Verf atA.nt1 7 Ct- t R h Ml. P T >Tdasue wah Drawn and ._ — P penficalwro p -Paled by caaIr n by refereruc mach a p,n h,=(. and n Ileamnaner !erred 9111 he Centrals. MADURA TllrfUMnnn %m stn.... ............. law." cr.....auw.r rrw wa....r,r r.�iai. rr'r Panr..rr,w Y.I.A ]..w.. \M•.W...w A..l�.ri.y..�r m7 m N.ry.wbr Mrrr.rY re ufrJltllwrw b..¢\ I.dr.✓.q.r•.r1 h..tl rru.ya Y er.rrtl Y,r.tlrr R.grwrs oa.. la4Y.nrar Yrr4tl rn4MK�.1 Wr...rwr 1 /4rYw.u..rrYJW rY..btl.M.YbraAMY.,ITr ba.r11Y4Y ✓].YUWI 'IWr. u✓.[ba✓a.rhr.rl.rMn.tl u.tl lr,Y R/.tl ✓W.Ya Rrr.M \rr3 Y.. �^^beY W..r.rrew\tnWrJ tb tArro CwnbWMmr.b \ar Pr.Rat ✓.ya,,,sY.mf..Y b,W.rI�Y.Yrt MY.Y[ilYR.ln>•r4l W�W.oL.rpWrI.4Y1Y ...r ✓Ib Ntl W ar.4rq \,.tlr W r.r.r ✓.q PT�.rr Mlrrr...arar f.+\Ymaar..NV\W w ✓tYr]r.rm]rrT.rvLm'he,.b\ tl Nw[W.Mw +wJ.rprawr..r..ar�w r w W.r Iw W ..w.r ✓r[\ N Y In.r.r.d �a,r W.yr.t U. Ytl. and staled this 18 day of April IPSyf N IPnaopll oto IWUruI (S ar L( r ITaleI .�f1i17VRIC T.ICIIRa /N'P nP WAIIC]II h 11175IA7 r l !R lq ty 3 acting p A PRT0. USA n8 (AUars I u-Frnd a usau O,oYaa a MA r✓.ulj ta, . insurance N tarnpmara. m Tthba m the CompaCompanies nies ' teK+bW bdvenym w.uau lev.eta peawea. 111136"D IS ISSUED SIWIKIANIMMY MEN naroassma NI rMeROF IKE OWNER Eah01110NED ON IKE SunR Uw,.rma 703D WeR.]oa par. aet ISO 1W"D tR1 AND rulNrlanRroRWANCEa Did taxnur ! Band - �OSA087 LABOR LABOR i MATERIAL PAYMENT BOND KNOW ALL MEN WY Tf1ESE PRESENTS. a. Pnwp.L hemrat [ter called Pnnclpal. and FTIPIAY -- TImIRe — OP MA SA A MJ L A 3130 WILSHIRE BLVD. LOS AT XLM, CA •• •••• p1 .17118 city o oft Da a+5umy,herc,aaaer oDed Surety, art heW and firmry DouM onto u ODlga. hnnn""e calk) Owner rar he a and Deaefit a of nmaets a nt herebelaw a Minne Pn�hwsand three hundred fl wnisa no of ti eG tnr a of for the Payment whereof Pnnnpal \Id suray btml themselves, their help, eaccutoes, Adm,muraton, \uZoesson and as.iSm, Jointly and for they, firmly bb the+e pre.ean. W NEREAS. Pnwpal has by lute, aST"Mal dated entered Into a ennIm" with Owner for Verf atA.nt1 7 Ct- t R h Ml. P T >Tdasue wah Drawn and ._ — P penficalwro p -Paled by caaIr n by refereruc mach a p,n h,=(. and n Ileamnaner !erred 9111 he Centrals. MADURA TllrfUMnnn %m stn.... ............. law." cr.....auw.r rrw wa....r,r r.�iai. rr'r Panr..rr,w Y.I.A ]..w.. \M•.W...w A..l�.ri.y..�r m7 m N.ry.wbr Mrrr.rY re ufrJltllwrw b..¢\ I.dr.✓.q.r•.r1 h..tl rru.ya Y er.rrtl Y,r.tlrr R.grwrs oa.. la4Y.nrar Yrr4tl rn4MK�.1 Wr...rwr 1 /4rYw.u..rrYJW rY..btl.M.YbraAMY.,ITr ba.r11Y4Y ✓].YUWI 'IWr. u✓.[ba✓a.rhr.rl.rMn.tl u.tl lr,Y R/.tl ✓W.Ya Rrr.M \rr3 Y.. �^^beY W..r.rrew\tnWrJ tb tArro CwnbWMmr.b \ar Pr.Rat ✓.ya,,,sY.mf..Y b,W.rI�Y.Yrt MY.Y[ilYR.ln>•r4l W�W.oL.rpWrI.4Y1Y ...r ✓Ib Ntl W ar.4rq \,.tlr W r.r.r ✓.q PT�.rr Mlrrr...arar f.+\Ymaar..NV\W w ✓tYr]r.rm]rrT.rvLm'he,.b\ tl Nw[W.Mw +wJ.rprawr..r..ar�w r w W.r Iw W ..w.r ✓r[\ N Y In.r.r.d �a,r W.yr.t U. Ytl. and staled this 18 day of April IPSyf N IPnaopll oto IWUruI (S ar L( r ITaleI .�f1i17VRIC T.ICIIRa /N'P nP WAIIC]II h 11175IA7 r l !R lq ty 3 acting p A PRT0. USA n8 (AUars I u-Frnd Y 2 O ou 2 H 2 u� 8 Z N_ Z Y. LL 3� C Q O =O Q F O 2 se LN u._,:U•U'L`J- UU1L0 EMKOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU A Mutual Company 1e0VILR OF ATFOttNLY KNOW AI.I. btl:N HY TIIYSE PJMSFtJ . That he EblPlll\ F.ILV IN IRANCF. OF% AOSAU A bl.tull l'..mWny I..rpnativa duly organized and eautlnR under the Wo of the Store of Wien, .non. and hntma era..raUnul off, e m the City of Weasau. County of blunthon. State of W..... ha. mnde nwrinutnl aatl apl.untryl and.ho he tluv t,aweatr Ilulke. ...mtan send opwing Jack 1.. Ilynun8_ Ib Irue and larfui atuanrym row t, with lu 11 p.wer and outh.u.1, h, eh, a•n retard. Its name. 0. ad sued, b ue.O. "M arknowll lw and d.tlyar ANY 11H At 1. IHINILS UNDERTAKINGC, HF.COGNIZANCEi, OR OTHER WRITTEN OBIJGATIONSINTI I /:NAn11tF.TIP:ltIOF- NOT TO EXCEED TIIF PENAL SID( OF FIVE MILLION DOLLARS (55,000,000) and Ihr."tratum thm hY n. full..ual Unly somreatent a.tf.ath bonds by the PNvIdcwL sealed with the tmp'rat'.rol of the nwlawotrnn and duly aurstnl by oa er,retury hrerby utlfylnt and confirming o0 Uut the sad tlarrlry tit fan. may do m the parmurr Thu powrrufottnrnry u vitiated pu.... m. I he folh.rmamadman adopted by the Bond a(Dtreelora.feaM Company at .Mina duly sealed .-J held in Ihr INS L. of hl.,V, IDTC who h reaWuto. u still in'Reee III_+OLVF.II that thr l'rsulmtand nnv Ytly1' nwWnN— rininrurappnnurr— afEMP1AYER9INSURAIICEOP WAIISAp A hlmuul l'ompmy lw, and thnl nvh..f Ihnn henl'y k authoNlyd W ntNte pawen of auoen�yquLLyfp[ mW any such In Me I.L.I. nth W any bond, unanto l.R w nmtmel ~%-ship to which It a atneheV S INWITNF_CSWUP.RRttF EMI' tl lYt. HAINSIH [ANI'F.IIFW'AIISAIIAblutual Companyhunuudthasprr UWb danM by tAeal.DrnulrntunJ plttfl,d by deanutanlvayr1ury a.dm.rpmalraidnbhmboalfudthh 2nd day of February _ 19 81 dyca\ t:htl' 1111 FILSINhlIVAN ('Y.IIFWAUSAUAhtamal Compsny u NY H II FarNson vim PINndlflt Ants, DJ Hanall Auuunt K.Yrebry STATE OF WISVINSI I CODNIy OA _I� _ Fabary jh On thu Zna _ d.y of ___ 19 Bl .bran me prnuna8y nose H 1) Farnw.dh _ t___ --- to mr lnown, wlw binl by msouly swar4 dW depve and uv that her. is vu. pr.d,.t.•f Ihr EMIT! IVEILS INSUPAU'E I1F WAUSAU A Mutual Company, the eo ponuon derrnbel menJ rhwh'arrutnl lhrabuvemewmmn, Chat Ae ln..rrlhe woluheW rwponUOn,thattAUUI faadtauld Intlmment meat h nwpwate u.11 and that it *.is so ufftanl h) onlrr of cite Ilnrd of Dire. ars of said corporation sad that he ngnrd hu namr thorn Uy hlr.wder IN W'ITNIXI W'11 A(F.I* I have hrnonU, set m) bond llW self and m1 •drawl ..I the day and year baron Rot above rnurn n d r [man. Lutrow 1 Q Notary Pubbe NOTAHY PUBLIC STATE. OF W IS CON SIN bl\' COMMLVSION IS PERLANENT STATE. OI W'I.St ONNIN I CF.ICTIFICATF. CITY OF W'AOahl1 I M COUNTY 111' MAIM III IN I 1. the ondrmann4 oest.lanl .,'nary d Lhll'Il1YEW; INStIRANCK OF WAUSAU A Mutual f'ompanr. a W4.Irin emporia. 6. hrnl.v crvidit that the '.w..sag .ml oamhnl peen of atom". WMICII MW-r CONTAIN A VALIDATING h rA fh:MFNT mtibrIT:II IN THE MARGIN THEREOF IN RED INK, remains in full forte and has wt been reeakrd, and Nnhnm.wetlhn Ihsr 4.161ul..f Ihr Iksnlaf IhrMlrnactfunhin tbt'm•e,ofaltarnqu Nllln finea SiRnd onJ seahJ m the t'n) of tYuwa. Ma.tA.m llanv CWtr of Wtu.mun, ihu __ day or— _ _ IJ_ _ ''�!4 p fib D.J tome.' �Il� AsNstanl SstlrLaty Nfttl: IF YUD IL1 \' /:. \NY ql1 "fit 1Ni IlY.liAll11U:0 TIII: VAIJbITY Olt WOR DING OF T1 1114 POWER OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATE The Contractor shall execute the following form as required by the California Labor Code, Sections 1860 and 1861: 1 am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every enployer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before comencing the performance of the work of this contract. Date: A/ & IPS SERVICES INCORPORATED (C(Contractor sy '147 gnatvre 5 �fft �e�� Attest: W 17A By: gnature t o G -5 x3-3s a� X !4/16/86 as e r7 , � . _ �lf!'cS :F" ZOING 7C''7AGE - - _- MISSION .LMICAN INSLAANCE CO INSURANCE COMPANY OF T11E NEST I.P.S. SERVICES, INC. 1670 Sessumes Drive Redlands. CA. 92374 sa•., __r aV . >me r . ', n.o^ r .r rt 'J .�rro . r r •A r , rr �(_ -b •••• -v - rC LY EO n _ + :.a ire v o.. .. , .E :o, m•e .+ .. - . ^..r i. ,. ea •ECVw _1iNAl. - -�- x x. CIO 004 67Wi 7/15/85 7/15/86 ; x 600 600 r. x - - x 600 x x x „! CIP 004 67 23 7/15/85 7/15/86 600 a ri�n A. r'^ •+ HJP 1002674 9/9/85 7/15/86 5'O00 5.000 'e H. m TWO 789 1114 5 /1/85 5/1/86 x_100 1100_ _ • +,' m i a- •a AddfEI5 -w1 Insured: City of Rancho Cucamonga. Its elected officers,ajnh -and amploy .i and anyot or partners specified In the Bid DOCU219nts. i ocsc^ 1 ,IT IS HEREBY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THIS POLICY MAY NOT BE CANCELLED NOR THE MOUNT OF '•� COVERAGE THEREOF REDUCED UNTIL 30 DAYS AFTER RECEIPT BY CITY OF A WRITTEN NOIICE OF SUCH, + CELLATION OR REDUCTION OF COVERAGE AS EVIDENCE BY RECEIPT OF A REGISTER LETTER." �m• CITY OF RANCHO CUGVDNGA_ _ __ _... �• }a_n „Fr,- „,r.�:�t;` = ^r c,••.ec,,.,. yrau net 9230 Baseline Read - "C” " t ° •or eE cwvn .o vAVr ✓u eneU9Ga TO 1 �'S• % +•n nrr�t ♦or^t 'A n•a r'ITim. v.ro M tM'MO TO TN F 'f P.O.Box 807 , un tvoL +nv o- _Aa:`au. rs :eiiirl aXS rt�neiwrarrvets�was+rr %,�, Rancho Cucamonga, C.1- 91730 CITY OF RANCHO C•UCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: City Council and Ciry Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs. City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer ral L077 SUBJECT: Approval and Execution of Professional Services Agreement between the City and Neste, Brudln 6 Stone Incorporated for Construction Management, Inspection and Staking for the Improvements of the North Side of Foothill Blvd. (China Alley) Attached is a proposal for Construction managemnet, inspection and staking for the above referenced proje5vsubmi:ted by Neste, Brudin and Stone, Inc. This' proposal is based upon an estimate of services to be provided at established hourly rates. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve for execution by Mayor and City Clerk the agreement for construction eanagement. Inspection, and staking for the improvements of the North Side of Foothill Blvd. (China Alley) betweeen the City and Neste, Drudin b Stone Incorporated of Corona (Contractor) for the proposed amount of $4,569.00 (f4,154.00 plus a ?OS contingency) and authorize the Finance Department to make payment to Contractor from the developers (China Alley) surety bond ($16,000.00) and Systems Development Fund as needed. Resp ctfully su tied, LBM P:bc ' Attachments �3� PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - This Agreement is mada and entered into this day of •• 1S —� between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY') and Neste, Brudin a Stone Incorporated (hereinafter referred to as o. "CONSULTANT "). A. Recitals. (i) CITY has herefore issued its Request for Proposal to pertaining to the Performance of professional services wit), respect to Construction Management, Inspection, and :taking for the Improve- ments of iha North Side of�onthill Boulevard (China Alley). (here- inafter referred to as -project-). (Si) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such sarvices. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform Profess- ion-41 services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, City's Planning Commission, City Council, and staff in the prepara- ar of Project. Perform (iv1 CONSULTANT represents that at is qualified to p such services and is willing io perform such professional services ar as hereinafter defined. Now, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: -1- t;l50 B. Agreement. .- 1. Defi,itions: The following definitions shall apply tc the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: (a) Project: Construction Management, Inspection, and Staking described in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services" hereto includ- ed, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports, and documents to CITY an required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings, and other meetings conducted by CITY`?.th respect to the Project as outlined in the Scope of Services (b) Services: Such professional services as are necess- ary to be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the Project. 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the Project in accordance with Exhibit "A" and applicable with Federal, State, and ^.ITY sta.ues, regulations, ordinances, and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all raps, surveys, reports, plans, and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents ") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit "A" to CITY within the time specified in "Pro- ject Schedule", Exhibit "8'. Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit "A ". -2- / ,qty CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments re- garding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in such form and in the quantities de- termined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 8 2 (b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONaJLTANT's sole cost and ex- pense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the te_ms of this Agreement. In the event any such other petsons are retained by CONSULTANT, 'qW � CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully quali- fied to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTMT ex- cept upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY a -reel as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT the sum outlined in E.hibit "A" for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, including the we k of employees, consul- tants, and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "U ". (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall oe made by CITY in ac- cordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and inch invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. -3- 1 V0 i veer All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit "B" either with respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed ninety -five percent (951) of individual task totals described in Exhibits "A" and "B". (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to LiN ULTANT any sum in excess of ninety -five per- cent (95%) of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental techni- cal documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY Final payment shall be made not later than sixty (60) days after presentatirn of finalwocuments and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional ser- vices requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be pa_d on a reimbursement basis In accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "B". Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. J. CITY agrees to orovi to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, if available, which CONSULTANT consideza necess- ary in order to complete the project. (c) Such information as is generally available from CITY .:les applicable to the project. -a- 0 /[/ (d) Assistance,. if necessary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. 5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, stud- ies, au:.-veys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports pre- pared oy CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the rroperty of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of saidada,uments and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any une or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration cr revision of the plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. the CITY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims, and losses including de- fense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another sits by the CITY, i.s staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONSUL- TANT at laast fifteen (15, days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit "B ", on a pro -rota basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photo- graphs, and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices 4Mesignated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices, and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those.persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: John X. Feenstra, Principal Engineer, Neste, Brudin s Stone Incorporated and Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer, City of Rancho Cucamonga. Any such notices, demands, invoices, and writ - ton communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -oight (AB) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. _E_ aV3 CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term, of this Agreemcnt the following policies of insurance: (a) Worker's Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY a ce-tificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontrac- tors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of com- pensation to his employeaV CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, 'r.. shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accord- ance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement ". (b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term .f this 7.4reement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, CON- SULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CCNSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance a�.ainst claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property dam- age arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of -7- .�t (/U at least Five Hundred Thousand Mllars ($500,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or oc- currence and at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions ( "malpractice ") providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for errors and omissions ( "malpractice ") with respect to loss aris- ing from actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services here- under on behalf of CITY. IRW (d) General l.;surance Requirements: x All insurance requir- ed by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to Cc business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8 (a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, off- icers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (3) the insure: waives the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after i thirty (30) days notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies "t ): promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insur- ance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not re- quired under this Agreement. -8 .D (i5" 61 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees, from all liability from loss, dPmage, or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intent onal or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the perfotmance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 10. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of pXformance hereunder shall be made, n- either In whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers, and agents are inde- pendent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 13. Attornevs' Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to re- cover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. -9- ) �/ 4. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any aM all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the part- ies with respect to the subject natter herein. Ea:h party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied lerein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained an this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of :his Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by al] parties. IN WITNEI:S WHEREOF, the parties hareto have executed Als Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: CONS[; TANI Date: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO,?GA JON D MIKELS, MAYOR Date: ATTEST: BEVERLY A. AUTRELET, CIT:' CLEP.K Approv pd as to form: wk f C ty Att me /% -10 dq/ EXHIBIT 'A' SCOPE OF SERVICES Construction Management Pre- Construction Confere cc Pay Estimates Contract Change Orders Labor Compliance Enforcement Final Report As -Built Drawings Inspection Full -Time Inspectio7 rd Documentation of Work T.Q. En`orc,�ment of Traffic Control Requirements Before and After Photographs Soils Testing and Plant Inspection - By Others , Construction Staking - As Heedel by Contractor 1 EXHIBIT '8' SCHEDULE OF WORK Schedule of work will follow the course of project construction. �V 2rW 0 EXHIBIT "C" COMPENSATION Compensation is proposed on an hourly basis per attached rate schedule. Estimated costs, as•uming a three (3) week concurrent construction period is as follows. Construction Management Construction Manager 4 Hours 0 $65.00 $260.00 Office Engineer 4 Hours 0 51.50 206.00 Administrative Secretary 4 Hours 0 34.00 136.00 Drafter Hours 0 43.00 86.00 Mileage �$ 'j 100.00 Total Construction Management $788.00 Inspection Senior Inspector 40 Hours 0 $50.00 $2,000.00 Mileage 150.00 Total Inspection 27 .00 Construction Staking 2 -Man Survey Crew 8 Hours 0 $125.00 $1,000 00 Survey Supervision 2 Hours 0 58.00 11;.00 Survey Rtsearch 2 Hours 0 50.00 _ :00.00 Total Cor.*truction Staking $1,216.00 �Sd e ■ U CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7. 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Citywide and Landscape Maintenance Maintenance Districts Annual Maintenance Contracts The City's Annual Parkway Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance of Parkways Citywide will expire as of June 30. 1986. In addition the City will assume responWlity for parkway maintenance of large portions of the Milliam 'yon Victoria Project and Lo-is' Terra vista Project as of July 1. 1986. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Engineer to s—k lublic bid proposals for Annual Maintenance Contracts for parkway r+tintenance of Citywide parkways and for Landscape Maintenance Districts no. 1. No. 2. No. 3, No. m and No. S. Res ctfully u ted, LBH:bc 1;)�/ CITY OF ILANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Lien Agreement between Paul F. McMichael and Cheryl A. McMichael and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9742 Leman Avenue The attached subject agreement between the City and Mr, and Mrs. McMichael provides for frgntage improvements which includes curbs, gutters, sidewalk and drM approach in return for a 10 -year lien on the McMichael's property fronting Lemon Avenue. Said street improvements will be constructed in conjunction with the City's Capital Improvement Project for the reconstruction of Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermnso Avenue. RECOMMEMUATI0:1: It Is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Lien Agreement between Paul and Cheryl McMichael and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in an anount not to exceed $2,170.00. Respectfully subuit dd. 'VG LBH:LFH:bc Attachments a 0 1 LIEN AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered Into this day of __ 1986 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY•) and Paul F. Mc Michael and Cheryl A. Mc Michael husband and wife, as joint tenants (hereinafter referred to as *OWNER*) for the installation of certain public improvements including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks and street pavements along a portion of Leman Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A. Recitals (1) CITY has prepa5ip plans and speclficatiors for, and presently T� contemplates the installation of, public improvements r,long Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and along Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street (the 'Lemon - Archibald Project' hereinafter in this Agreement). (ti) OWNER owns that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 201- 251 -36, which is located on Lemon Avenue, which property is within the limits of the Lemon- Archibald Project. (111) WHER desires to participate in the Lemon - Archibald Project so as to dedicate necessary right -of -way and to contribute its pro -rata portion to the total costs of the Lemon- Archibald Project related to street frontage improvements along OWNER's property located on Lemon Avenue (the 'MC Michael Portion' hereinafter). (iv) CITY is willing to include the Mc Michael Portion within the Lemon - Archibald Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and OWNER as follows: X53 -1- 1. OWNER shall execute a Deed o Easement in favor of CITY for street right -of -way and related purposes in form and content identical to that attached hereto as Exhibit 'A'. 2. CITY 1s authorized to cause OWNER', Deed of Easement to be recorded forthwith upon execution of tnls Agib mt. 3. CITY shall include the Mc Michael Portion as a part of the construction of the Lemon - Archibald Projnct and shall cause all necessary public improvements to be installed in accordance with CITY's plans and specifications therefor. The limits of said construction are more particularly described in Exhibit '8' attached hereto. �y Ts 4. OWNER agrees to pay to CITY, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, CITY's actual costs incurred in constructing the Mc Michael Portion. Th3 parties hereto agree that the costs of said construction is as shown in the Estimates of Construction attached hereto and identified as Exhibit 'C'. 5. Upon completion of the Lemon- Archibald Project, and the +k Michael Portion thereof, CITY shall cause a Notice of Completion to be prepared and prese,ted to OWNER. Upon presentation of said Notice of Completion, OWNER agrees to pay the full principal amount of S ZPTO,CC1 *on or before the 31st day of December, 1986. OWNER stay, at OWNER's sole option, pay said amount of S ;Ls-r.on* in ten (10) annual installments to be due and payable on or before the 31st day of December during each calendar year commencing with the year 1986. In the event OWNER fails to timely make any payment specified herein, or in the event of sale of the property, the entirety of any amount reaa'ning shall become due and payable to CITY. Payments shall be made to CITY 4r N* * -b a ttcat d �LA -2- S at the Rancho Cucamonga City Nall, Attention: Administrative Services Dire OWNER ur at such other address of person as the CITY may designate in vritin9 and rITY agree that in the event OWNER opts to pay the above - specified an.unt by annual installments+ that said annual installments shall be due and payable without invoice by CITY ar any other notice to OWNER. 6. CITY shall have aj..l is hereby given a lien on OWNER'S property full Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 201 - 251 -36) to secure the fu performance by OWNER of M-NER's payment obligations set forth in pL.agraph 5, above. in the event that OWNER fails to timely f lfillythenfarcevt o ligatione o`e specified in paragraph 5, + CITY may. ersonal obligations hereunder aTTs the lien provided for or sue OWNER on OWNER's p of which payment obligations shall be considered personal regardless of whether or not OWNER may have or shall have transferred all or any or OWNER's interests in said property+ whether by operation of law or otherwise. 7. CITY's waiver of any breach by OWNER with respoct to any payment obligation set forth herein shall not constitute a waiver of any other such breach. B, OWNER agrees to grant to CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees and contractors such rights of eTM;s and/or yEtemporar toconstruction the easements as are deemed necessary by C completion of the N.c Nichael Portion. 9. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 10. In the event any legal proceeding is instituted satd enforce anv hall provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party ass -3- be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an amount determined by the court to be reasonable. 11. This Agreement is binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, wherever the context requires or admits. 12. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whether oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreema.it h 1 be valid or binding. Any modification of thi Agreement shall be effective only if it is in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY PROPERTY OWNER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By:_ :effiny King Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk Paul F. Mc Michael - Cbe�yl A. Mc c C PROVED AS TO FGRM: City Attorney ffitfiffffRftfffffRff 4ftRRflRik4> ft4RffRt flRif41RM4tMRffftRif4ttf ttfltflfft STATE_ OF CALIFORNIA 3 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss me before AUTHELET personally known to me to be the MayorEand CityrClerk,rrespectively, of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed it. WITNESS HY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. otary gnature STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OP SAN BERNAROINO ss me this the _( day, of y��� before the noars gttaa g� o [ G4i.;ana ppeere �T- QL¢L lCdj#t v.,d A vYw ��1�1sC� persona y now o me proved to me an the basil of aetiefactory evldance to bet 6 1 ha pelsonE sl wh a snra�me e) d G su scr bed to the within instrument qpnd bcknawlegNA IMF' Of I9AL. ed . NiTNEBS NT iotary gnat ire lA Ja C e Y( 99 nor. rUalK c oqi, 4 �• SJI at41RR0��] mmy _ NOTE: WHEN DOCUMEN� IS EIEL1IfEb BY A CORPORAT1011 OR P.4RTNERS111p, THE ABOVE /CKuOW_ EOGETiEITT IS fill ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATiON/PARTHERSH:P ACKROWLEDGEMENT IS �.s7 S'AHIBIT "B" /4 /4 /4 n N L ;AVENUE .D�E 9 'I l' 0 Q N O V i ry ml4 a 2 3 N W O ` 7 0 ,4 Q A A B u ;AVENUE .D�E 9 EXHIBIT "C" �o " CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA f� S ENO727EF9INC DEYAAI)R"fI v / Lel�u Avamur -- RECC*IbTRuC.TICN �1 .. �i p $ PRELIMINARY '. : COST ESTM&TE Date: nn By: LIi P=L L C�RYt_ McM%c�t_ AFN Z01 -751 -'.� NO. ITE.4 nt)AYiIT' UNIT UNIT PRICE A`!OtM I PCC CuRC LGuTTeR 80 LF 9.0p I)D.CD 2110 5F 3DO (048m Z PCC 09= QFP9nAcR 3 PCC 61DmwAw- 407- aF ,ZOO I 804.00 TMA -r � alC0aPa0 alol•GrG ar CAP of RAKIms C11ameeae ' "NRtttlaLl mmio CBy, of Rancho CLUm"Ne �?t P O Boa act Rancho C11amonta. CA 917" - van aeon rwitatraatoo +oua Lyl EASEMENT FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDS1.111014, receipt of wblch Is ber by acixaeledaed, su ae an Chery as — hosbtnd and vIfe at Joint tenants GRANT(S) M the CUP of Raada CYCamcesa, IF MarL9ps1 Coe;msion. an EASEAIENF for Street mi related purpose% In. One and op• a'Naseetala real property to themyof RaecboCltamOOaa, coemy ots. &eardmo. Sdteof 661orma, Dteoibfd G Fallon: That wrtim of the South 192 fat of the VLst 112 of Lot 29 of the Footh111 Frostless erilt Cooper , Subdivision No. 2, eaceptln9 there frees the Vest 192.1 feet thereof In the City of Rancho Cuctplongar a Part of t4c South 1/2 of the South 112 of S ;Ct10n 26 and the South 1/2 Of the 506thvest 1/4 of Staler, 2S Toenship I North, Range 2 licit as Pee Plat recorded In boot 2O, Page 24 of Naps. In the Office of the County Record;+ of said county, within tae f711uving retangullr shaped strip of land described as fot loos The Smth a feet of said portion of tot 29 of teal Fmthlll Frostless Fruit CoOpaV. Subdlrlson b. 2 Euhlbtt A attached hereto and bate a part hereof by this reference. Dates aeNRNAL ACILNOMPEOO{tRMT bun. t„QA!!1$e:% /� I Onunlnr J /�dMOr j10,;- 19g alpenn, . sL Cm.mrel sGt� �tAat ✓(e.+_ � .>1,t nLLC`�ya¢Idi__ Iy�M. M�enI�nroMO�Uh P.qc a�emrvrcP�r✓ed OFFICIAL StAL u } ldo C anwttn Iq•M MYC tNedeY py ���� "�� Wes--- i�- �ed�ffCG}.��.— a>= 6lt1rgC4 D PI "s"..le'+a I' t n,LIP� . rl ewe Is" m led Data dI CIInIMIb e•naMa fy al•�rmnwlr lum "sea pneNN�bM �a�.r. nY'•N4 eteere VIWn�nttryTanl LMe:.MwYddad lMl �1aMe1Mh F."w . — WI Ne5$TrnMdaMdnCU1HY � Ier Le•pY1Ma • . De�o it • aat-il A PGG{L aCaapelCy.Gtar• ettaae we MM;G atavPrt[OPtrlx{. I t.,9 {allrWRi P. RESOLUTION NO. Er-Or-MR Sc- - /.� 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEMENT FROM PAUL F. AND CHERYL A. MCMICHAEL AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY C,ERK TO SIGN SAME. WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamcnga to establish requirements for construction of frontage improvements in conju•ction witn the Lemon Avenue Reconstruction Project WHEREAS, Installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, drive approach and pavement located at 9742 Lemon Avenue, to be made part of the Lemon Avenue Reconstruction Project. WHEREAS, Paul and Cheryl McMichael have submitted a Lien Agreement as reimbursement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFOP,E, 8EZ NESOLYED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Californian does accept said Lien Agreement, autho,lzes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this Sth day of May, 1986., AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Bever y ut a et�ii l . City MFrk Jeffrey Zl n1TayoF— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiBIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FR0.1: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer B1: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Approval to Seek Bids for the Improvement of Lewron Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street The plans and specifications for tht subject projects have been substantially completed therefore, at this time, the Engineering Division requests permission to 44k bids for construction. Lemon Avenue Reconstruction will be funded by Gas Tax and Systems Development; the Engineer's Estimate for this project is $316,477.00. Archibald Avenue Reconstruction will be f• oy Systems Oevetopment; the Engineer's Estimate far '..is project is $959,505.00. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Cbunril adnpt the attached resolution granting appra•al Lo seek bids for the improvement of Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street and to fund these combined projects from Gas Tax end Systems Development based on a total Engineer's Estimate of $677,992.00. Respectfully submi ed, LBH:HDL:bc a6.�t RESOLUTION NO 4 4R $ip ' 1­19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVINC PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'IMPROVEMEIT OF LEM04 AND ARCHIBALD AVENUES', III SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORF, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for 'The Improvement of Lemon and Archibald Avenues'. BE — FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the w0lV pf specified in the aforesaid plans and gj specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: 'NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS' Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the office% of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 27th day of May 1986, sealed bids or proposals for the 'Improvement of Lemon and Archibald Avenues in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, ralifornia 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonaa, California, marked, 'Bid :or construction of the improvement of Lemon and Archibald Avenues'. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice 1, hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code. Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Ccntractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per them wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per them wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per them wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C. Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any im rested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. .DG3 The Contractor shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollare ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less thaa the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of thr • Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accorda :h the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions to Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor oe subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprent��e5hip program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The rtiffcate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such case. shall not to less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or 8. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership It ough apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appenttces on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontract_, under him •hall Comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1717.6 In the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wa „+ schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and Its branch offices. Q6 Y' Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for Al workmen employed in the execution of tn!s contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor snore than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed In accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payab; o the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount ±s equal to at least ten percent-%10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter Into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1005) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (505) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form ha, not been Issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class •A' License (General Engineering Contractor) In accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Cole, Section 7000, et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pu'suant thereto at the time this contract is awarded. The work Is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file In the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application tr the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $25.00, said $25.00 is nonrefundable. .�65 Upon written request by ti,e bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $5.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities In lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. by order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this _ day of 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED �Y the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, this __ day of I9 ATTEST: -ZTty c eri Mayor ADVERTISE: May 12, at.o May 19, 1986 M CITY OF RANCHO CUC,"IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 IV TO. City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Contract Change Order No. 3 for Engineering Design Services on Archibald Avenue Reconstruction, Lemoi Avenue to Banyan Street, Plaster Plan Storm Drain Line 4 -8 Additional engineering design services for Archbbald Avenue Reconstruc:ion from Lcmon Avenue to Banyan Street and Paster Plan Storm Drain due to the addition of alternate storm drain pipe systems and additional curbs, gutters antpeldewalks at various locations. These design services are in addition 0 the original design agreement awarded to Derbish. Guerra 6 Associates, Inc. of Ontario, California on January 2, 1985, Contract Change Order No. 1 awarded August 21, 1985 and Contract Change Order No. 2 awarded January 2, 1986. The contract change order increases the contract price by $1,500.00. The contract fee, therefore will increase from $31,900.00 to $33,400.00 and will be paid by Systems Development Funds. RECpMENDATION: It 1s recommended that City Council approve the attached Contract Change Order No. 3 for the additional engineering design services by Derbish Guerra and Associates for the additional fe: of $1,500.00. Respectfully submi ed, L BI I: LEH: be Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA ENGINEERInG SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 3 dJl O rder' , 0.: 02998 :hstcr Plan Stom Drain Line 4 -Br April 25, 1986_ Archibald Ave Re:,,astruction Leann Ave. to Banyan St. Date TO: Derbish, Cuerra 4 Associates ngineer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services DE5CRIPTIO, OF CHANGES — N -RIFfE- in Contract Pricm 1. Revise proposed curb alignment. 2 Revise proposed striping plan. 3. Revise contract specifications to provide alternate star= drain =at�:lal. 4. Prepare legal descriptions for adItlonal dedication. 5. Dal'te conttructlon ourvey sarvic its TOTAL $1,500 00 JUSTIFICATION The ai,iu,t of the Contract rill be Increased by the sum of: One Thousand five _ h,ndr -d sad -tY,� - -- _ Dal l ars ($ 1.soe.o3 The Contract Tottb irclLding this and previous Changt Order; will je: Thirty -three rnpyg�j four hundred and ion - - - -� ---- ---'— Onllars (E 33,400 00 1 The Contract period provided for completion will be Unchanged Days This document will become a supplement to the Contract ant all provisions will apply hereto. Requested: ' of T nu b , City nq neer - -Da ACCEPtcd: "` 1" -f },e Sa gyrgeer — =a DAproved: ---ga—yor, City of anc o Cucamonga --ba M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: May 7, 1986 To: CIE Lou cil and City Hanager From: Ji , Administrative Services Director Subject Ca rnia Municipal Insurance Aethority (CMIA) At the April 3, 1986, Council meeting, Council authorized Mayor King and Councilmember Buquet to serve with the City Manager, City Attnrney and I to review documents pertaining to membership in the CMIA We met on April 11, .936 and a decision to ,loin the CMIA was made by the committee. Attached for your adoption is a ~Iution autharizing me to sign the agree- ment for membership and authorizfirig payment of the deposit premium. The level of insurance determined by the committee was a self insured re- tention (SIR) of $500.000 00 with a $10 million maximum. Additionally, the City's current automobile liability policy will be modified to allow coverage from $10,000 00 to $500,000.00, from the current $1,000 00 to $1 million The annual premium savings from the auto policy will be used to help offset costs to establish an Effective Risk Management program Administration cf the liabil y program within the SIR ($0- $500,000) is at the local agency's discrEtion. A separate report relating to administration of the program is also included on this agenda. The estimated premium for July 1, 1986 - June 30, 1987 for the CMIA coverage ($500,000 to $10 million) is approximately $78,464 RECOMMENDATION. Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing application for membership in the California Municipal Insurance Authority. nsclunco ro. D%' 130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. AGREEING TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE AUTHORITY AND PARTICIPATE IN ITS LIABILITY PROGRAM MUSSELS. pursuant to the provisiona of Sections 6500 and folloving, 990.4 and 990.8 of the Government Coda, this city wishes to enter into an agreement with various other public entities entitled 'Joint Powers Agreement Creating the California Municipal Insurance Authority' (the 'Authority'), for the purpose of oStaining coverage in the Liability Program of the Joint Powers Authority created thereby, as more fully set forth in said agreameut; and WHEREAS, the estimated deposit premium to be paid by this city for said liability coverage is the sum of $78,464; and WHE4 . said Liebilitg,�ogram offers significant advantates to thi• city in terms -oat, coverage aaii services and entering such Program, on the a1� conditions hersioaf`er set forth, appears to be in the best interest of this city. NW, TB"GORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Reecho Cucamonga: SECTION 1: That this city authorise Jim Hart. Administrative Services Director. to execute the Joint Powers Agreement on behalf of this city. SECTION 2: That the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby consents pursuant to the above - mentioned Joint Pavers Agreement, sad the resolution# and policies enacted in implauantation of such Agreement, to eater said Liability Program an the following couditionst (a) That the estimated deposit premium for this city for the July 1,19„5 -87 Liability Program Year, as determined by the Authority, shall be paid in the amount of $78,466 to obtain coverage. SECTION 3: That the c(ty htKeby selects $500,000 as its Self- Insured Retention (SIR) for the July 1, 1985 -87 Liability Progr. Year; which SIR it recognizes will be one of the factors to be utilized in computing thin city's Retrospective Premiums sad related Retrospective Premium Adjustments. SECTION 4: That the city ,lereby selects $10 million as its Limits of Liability for the July 1, 1986 -87 Liability Program Year, SECTION St That the city ha:eby designates Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director, whose address is P.0 Box 607, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 as its representative an the California Municipal Insurance Authority's Board of Directors. a.20 Resolutiou Bo. Page 2 SECTION A: That the Treasurer of the city is hereby authorized to pay to the California Municipal Insurance Lutbority the amount of 978,464 for its July 1, 1986 -87 Liability Program Year estimated deposit premium. SECTION 7: That the Secretary of the city in directed to certify a copy of this resolution and to forward the same resolution, the sirned Agreement, and the deposit premium estimate payment promptly by mail to the California Municipal Insurance Authority. 4921 Dam Way. Pair Osks, California. 93628, for coverage begioninS July 1. 1986. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19*. AYES: MOSS: ABSENT: IiPf ATTEST: Beverly A. Autbelat, City Clerk Jeffrey Ring, Mayor 1, BEVERLY A. AOTEELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held an the a day of *, 19**. Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rrncbo Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Autbelet. City Clerk a-7 i "..ss. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: May 7, 1986 To: Cit,y� �ouu9cil and City Manager From: Jimiit9rs, Administrative Services Director Subject: Ad6listration of General Liability Program rAf, Ion With the new California Municipal Insurance Authority handling excess general liability insurance coverage, the administration of the general liability pro- gram needs to be modified We are recommending certain changes be made in the programs administration: 1 Currently, all claims received ire forwarded to Carl Warren E Cc , for adjusting purposes There is a charge to the City for handl- ing claims, even claims the City acknowledges should be paid we are reccmnending thh rstaff be authorized to review each claim, make a determination on handling and forward only those claims which require detailed adjusting by an adjusting agency 2 The goverment code allo*,s for Council to delegate certain re- sponsibilities to staff in handling claims and making payments for settlement Government Code Se -Lion 935 4 allows Council to delegate authority to settle claims up to $20,000.00. Claims settlements beyond $20,000 Oo must be approved by Council We are recommending that Council delegate responsibility to settle claims up to $5,000.00 to the Administrative Services Director 3. Claims are currently rejected by process of law (no formal Council action rejecting a claim is taken within 45 days of receipt of the claim), and formal rejection letters are forwarded to claimants. The statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit is 6 months when the formal letter is sent and 2 years if no letter is sent. Rather than have Council review and make a determination regarding every claim, staff 1s recommending Cruncil delegate, to the Admin- istrative Services Director, the antnority to act as a representative of the Council for claims rejection purposes. This allows the free- dom to immediately reject a non meritorious clam, thus, beginning the 6 months 30 -40 days earlier. Attached for Coun ils consideration and adoption is a resolution effectuating the three aforementioned recommendations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt the attached resolution. 7a- RESOLUTION 110. p (� - 131 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAP.ONGA. SETTING FORTH ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE PURPOSE Of ADJUSTING AND SETTING CLAIMS AND ACTIONS AGAINST THE CITr AND AUTOORIEIMG CERTAIN CITY EMPLOYEES TO COMPROMISE OR SETTLE CERTAIN CLAIMS AND ACTIONS AGAINST THE CITY A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is self- iosured for liability claims and actions. (ii) The 4ity of Rancho Cucamooga has retained an independent adjusting fire to administer the City's self- ioeuraace program, including the analysis and investigation of claim and actions. (iii) California J ermeut Code Section 935.4, a portion of the _y California Tort Claim Act, provides, in pertinent parts as follows: n "A. . . , local public entity by . resolution, say authorise an employee of the local public entity to perform curb functions of the governing body of the public entity under this part as are prescribed by the local public entity, . A . resolution may provido that, upon the vrittea order of such employees the audito^ or other fiscal officer of the local public entity shall cause a warrant to be issuou %pan the treasury of the local public entity in the amount for which a claim has been allowed, ceapromised or settled." (iv) Ilia City Council desires to :et forth adaiaistrative procedures for the prompt settlement of meritoriout, claim and action, and to minimize adninistrative and legal costa incurred by the City. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved as follows: In all respect@ as not forth in the Recitals, Part A. of thin Resolution. 2. The Administrative Services Director, is autbori:ed to allow, compromise and /or settle claim against the City of Rancho Cucamonga, without prior approval of this City Council, when the amount of any such Allowance, compromise or settlement does our =coed the am of Five Thousnad Dollars (05,000.00). 073 3. Any proposed settlement of any claim or actim in excess of Five Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) shall first be epproved by this City Council. 4. Whenever a claim or action has been filed against the Cites and after investigation and analysis, the Administrative Serv.,as Director determines that the City may be partially or wholly liable thereon and that each e)ai■ or action is meritorious, the Mainietrative Services Director may allm. compromise and /or settle any such claim or action in accordance with the procedures set forth herein. (Any payment shall be conditioned upon the receipt, by the City Attorney, of fully executed releasess dismissals or similar documents in form and contour approved by the City Attorney.) S. The Administrative Services Director is hereby authorized and directed to reject and /or dany claim, applications to file late claim and to otherwise administer the p adutas set forth in State 1" concerning claim iaat the City, including the proviu ou of requisite notice to claimants. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of as 19*. AT93: NOW: 68841St Jeffrey Ling, ATTEST: Beverly A. Anthelet, City Clark I, BEVERLY A. AOSIIELESs CITE CLEM of the City of Reecho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution vas duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular (spacial, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the a day of as 19**. �Ct nat P: To: From: By: Subject: BACKGROUND: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Mdy 7, 1986 City Council and City Manager Bill Holley, Director Community Set ices Departarent Karca McGuire, Assistant Park Planner sip,�' isn Approval to Submit Application For Funding Under The Roberti - Z'berg Program For Development of Picnicking Facilities and Refurbishment of The Restroom Structure at Beryl Park. tae The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Community Improvement Program for fiscal year 1986 -87, includes the development of picnicking facilities and refurbishment of the existing restroom facility ct Beryl Park. These improvements are needed to better meet the needs of the park user. The attached conceptual plan, which has been reviewed by the Park Development Commission, indicates the proposed improvements. The plans provide for the reuse and renovation of the existing restroom building along with the addition of new picnic..lug facilities including overhead shelters, tables and barbecues, to further improve the recreational opportunities the park already offers. Funding for the improvements will cone from the City's 1985 -86 allocation of the State Roberti - Z'berg Urban Open Space and Recreation Program in the amount of $31,695.00, with the remaining $10,800.00 necessary to complete the work being derived from the Park Development Fund. In orde^ to apply for the Roberti - Z'berg funding, it is necessary for the City Coincil to approve the attached Resoiuticn authorizing the submission of a grant application for these funds. It 1s also necessary for the City Council to approve the rtcached e.ategorieal Exemption for the prcject, indicating that the pr t,lect is categorically exempt under Section 15302, Class 2 of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which ar• also followed by the City . 0-215- r Peryl Park grant May 7, 1986 paap ^ curnarized Class 2 of the CEOA Guidelines consists of the replacement or reconstruct {on of existing structures and facilities where the new facility will be located on the sane site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity of the facility replaced. That the City Council: 1. approve the attached Categorical Exemption for the Beryl Park Restroom Refurbishment and Picnic Area Development and: J. Approve the attached Resolution approving the City's submission, of a grant application for funding under the State's Roberti -Merg Urban Open Space and Recreation Program. Attachments to an Cate{orical Exemption Resolution 0716 LAI ■ k f L a 00 , P II� �c 1 ' r4� l kr -, NOTICE OF EXEMPT11ON YO: —Of f1ce of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 _l, County Clerk County of San Bernardino FROM: (Public Agency) cteV �r Rancho Cucan.onaa. P.O. Box 807 Ranana Cucamonaa. CA 91730 BERYL PARK PICNIC AREA DEVELOPMENT AND RESTROOM REFURBISJJVa Project TItle Beryl Park, 6524 Beryl Street p .. • r c R d1 re Project Locan�n�lty Project Location- {'ounry Addition of New Picnic Facility and Reiurbishmeat of Existing Restroon Facilities Qesarptlon of Nature, Purpce, and Benelleiarles of Project, or er sees Exempt 5=1= Check One Mbilsterlal (Sec. :3073) ' Declared Emergency (See. 15071 (a)) Emergency Project (Sec 13071 (h) and (e)) 1 Categorical Exemption. State type and section number. r� Section 15302 Class 2 CEQA Guidelines caw` ns why pmjeC-. exit M t: Karen McGuire (714)_ 989 -1858 eat. 220 ,it'll: - Contact Person Area Cade Telephone Exlenslon . L1 app curt: 1. Attuh certified document of exemption finding. '=.a: s`i - 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the Projeet7 Yes No —••_ ;. _„ Date Received for Filing __ , �•,�_ . . _ Ntvnr- Cifv nP Ranehn Cueananca .II1L --�i:• tY• -. e'. _. - ��,- n• -_� t &aua Revised 3unwr 1927 ••_ ,it'll: - - .S"'. ^c= `= C' _ ., -• : :~r;, a+%= �'•� -. RESOLUTION 110. gtp - 1 301 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AFPLICATION FOR GRANT FONDS ORDER TEE ROEERTI- Z'EERG URBAN OPEN SPACE PROGRAM VOR THE BZRYL PARR PICNIC ABU DEVELOPMENT AND RESrADOH BUILDING REFURBISEHENT PROTECT WHEHEASs the legislature of the State of California ban enacted the Roberti- Z'Berg Urban Open -Space and Recreation Program, which provides fuuds to certain political oubdivisions of the State of California foe acquiring lend@ and for developing facilities to meet urban recreation needs, and WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation hai been delegated the responsibility for the adainistration of the program, setting up necessary procedures governing application by local agencies under the program; and WHEREAS, said procedureso establ imbed by the State Department of Parka fir' and Recreation require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of applications prior to submission of said applicatica• to the state; and WHEREAS, said applications contain a certification that the applicant will comply with all federal, state, and local anviroamental, public health. relocation, affirmative action, and clearinghouse requirements and all other appropriate codes, Iav and regulations prior to the expenditure of the grant funds; and WHEREAS, the projects applied for under this program =at be of a high priority and satisfy the moot urgent park and recreation needs with unmet seeds in the most heavily populated areas. NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT VESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Reecho Cucamonga hereby: 1. Approves the filing of an application for funding under the Roberti- Z'3erg Urban Open -Space and Recreation Program; and 1. Certifies that said agency understands the general provisions of the agreement; and 3. certifies that said agency has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the projects funded under this program; end 4. Certifies that said agency has or will have available prior to commencement of any work on the projects included to these applications matching money from a noustate source; and @217 S. Certifies that the projects included in these applications conform 'to the recreation element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga general plan, and 6. Appoints t► Director of the Community Services Department as agent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to conduct all aegotiationas execute and submit all documents including but not limited to applications, agreemeats, ameadmeata, payment request, and so on ,which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned projects. and 7. Appoints the City Attorney as legal counsel for said agency vitb authorisation to sign the certification on page 1 of the applitationc. PASSED. APPROVED, sad ADOPTED this * day of *, 19*. 0 - 'D 80 is> CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: John Meyer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: RELEASE OF CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT C.L. Builders is requesting release of a $3,000 CertiNcate of Deposit for the sales trailer and sign on Lot 54 of Tract 9321 (6512 Peridot). Staff has inspected the site and determined that the mailer and sign have been removed. `i)lf RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the release of Certificate of Deposit n tii—le amount of $3,000 to C.L. Builders. Respectfully submitted, az6e� Brad Buller City Planner BB:JM:cv A4 a N !4 l w . ! f% •i j � n Q9 I ay r• `� I as v v .� ela .01 •t'> O �av �I ner ..,. ��"�• l7 O ��a o . ... ^ 3� G• a4 O rF 9 oy 7 Z` °'I /v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION -VICINITY MAP N a rar .� Ian aya 4w. bU eau O �! • Irt ; i a ;f n .- I ,j u t.. If •fl # (u� Asir_ t %9. to p GJi ac<rA �l �n� a aJi ro0 � � t (.j t© S� • QQ h yar •tea Bart wm ea00 nay wY• °'I /v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION -VICINITY MAP N a n INC. March 21, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P 0. Box 807 9320 -C Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Mr Torret Ref: Tract No 9321, FILING. RC -039 Dear Mr. Torret: "TMORR�,,�pot�ro_ "L•wMMO ars v""M AN APR 31986 7j8j81�1llf1Tf1 f21yi4:S, 6 Enclosed you will find copies of Sales Office 6 Sign Permit Applications for the above referenced tract. Also included are the receipts for the deposits that were made after approval. Please be advised that the Bales trailer and sign have been removed and all conditions of approval have been met. Thareiore, we are r:questing release of our cash deposits in the amount totaling $3,000.00. If you have any questions to this request, please contact me Sincerely, CIL BUILDERS- DEMOPERS, C. Debbie Marrocco Planning Department l DOM= Enclosures L -Sx BUILDERS - DEVELOPERS 521 No. Mountoln Ave., SuDe A e Upland, California 91786 a Telephone (7141981-1041 I bi•ty of ranchD Ei,rbdel home sales cucamonga office permit •IGE.7ERAL INFOR.9ATIOt1 - :° -- -•l'fi 2lw J) -ALS JFFI= Ld.URLa.a • 1ILl1T 6512 7e rido0. ' T I Rancho Cucamonca, CA I ijZ Lt�21 Q[1• X39 - i.. L LZ'c, di...,lit Tiib CUUntry Crest ;1 521 %. 4ountain Avenue, Suite A, Upland, California 91786 •'-c:•l1[.TrvITY DESCRIPTION 1Cr :S.PPP OF PROPOSED ACf:7I7Y, IDCGDI::J of 71 jC ,- M.ACFS:J..S. PAXi.I:IG, FIN'- 3. _c110 Sf rhtrccen 113) tncl•_r. -,,1 h NO—M If approved• this permit ':ill be valid for tu.ivo (12) months from the data of p approval. Extonclons for maximum of tuelvo (12) months my be applied for, hwever, S cause for unusual delays mutt be ahoun and that continalod use will not constitute a nuisance or to objectienablo to the residential ucas in tho neighborhood. Fee for ouch extension 1a $SO In the avant a parfotmance bond It required ac sat forth under Section 61.0229(g), Title 6, Div X. Chapter 2, County Code, then tSc applicant shall cub=it a minimum of t-wo (2) bide from lieonsed contractors for said uork and the amount of -no cash bond chaLl be the sum of the highest bid plus ten percent (30%). !�'%;: �' + • c ,;.1'x. ACTIOil+ APPROVED By: 1 • .. O DENIED , Byl ` SEE REVERSE SIDE 6F THIS PERMIT REAuONS, FOR COM)ITIONS. f�2ZO OASt4- 1ePastT �g� 44 43 42 NAT 35 34 / 41 PART . 33 / w 45I ` I 36 I vxi 1 , w' w 40 a V, I46 0 _ 38 37 39 31 G 47 AI TA y48 T 15x 49 16 17 18 N 50 14 i., loo r 13 I2 I I ' I HIGHLAND z ` METROPOLITA AT R DISTF 54 I ti 58 G� 51 89W 57 a. a y 52 // ai / 56 ' o�Firy /53 55 A> •• • . ld6RNQ.t/T n (714) M-1851 n-r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post office Box 807 9320•C easo Line Road California 91730 1 .,rri;ry Of rancnN 1gn Permit cucamonga application general information Name of escabllshmont Country Crest Date April 17, 1984 Address.. 6512 Peridot, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Appllcant'� name CIL Builders - Developers, Inc Address 521 North Mountain Ave, Suite A, L'pland,CA phone 714/981 -3041 Omer' -s Nine C/L Rudders - Developers. Inc. Address 521 \ Mountain Ave, Suite A. Upland, C.\ :one 714/981 -1041 Number and tvpc of al�n(s): X Tamporary Nall Monument Conupy N Subdivision —Other _Uniform Sign Grogram Directional _Pedestrian Other Size: Le_ nath Width ? -h Sign 1 4' 8' 1" Sign 2. -- -- -- Sign 3 -- -- Sign 4 —� Sign 5. Sign 6. Overall Helcht Square Feet Blde.face SaSe. 8' 72' N/A If temporary or subdivision, date of installation Hnrth 17 1984 If temporary or subdivision, date of expiration March 12, 19F9 Bond amount and identification number L-I>) CA^n 1)- ,'it,7— Indicate sign copy, size, color and materials on plans described on the reverse Of this sheet ✓Approv _- ented By: Date I-2o -R LL Comments: 'No., photo C &M C /L, ISC COCSTRI CREST, • COUlJ"J.w c�a 4109.990s 1 ^ 9E@ 6391•,7. SIZE: 4' X 8' Color: White back%roand /red border d copy Material: Plywood Q- 8 Fr _iT.•fc• „ C ,all CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 9320 -C Baae Jne Road Ran.-ho Cucamonga. California 91730 (714) 9891851 ec.nw om ''11 ns GCbb..la ��.wim at can DncarrgN upru.na - -� -I a, up p, u1 Mn w p,.0 Y.lw p,�, .M,lp YlrlW ,N19 .lG4IMM Ia Ia� o,au .4FNUq.w G v3 - lot, l 31 • ro e,m Nwllwroaa 1��v a,+ao suawwvca,nu e,ne o.awarwr a,m nl+ A. 7G•aIl n e. 500. Rwe,ot Number 21003 TOTAL er i C","� D g9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1926 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FINAL AGREEMENTS WITH ESRI FOR PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED INFO TI ON S RD ARE AND bUtINAft 1. BACKGRCUND: In December 1985, the City Council authori!ed the acqu s t on of a computerized Geographic Information System for the Community Development Department and Revenue Assessment Section. At the last meeting, the Council approved a request tc upgrade the proposed system by acRWing a larger central processing unit (CPU) with a capacity for 64 lines. The attached agreemt:nts with Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) and Honco Software, Inc., are for the acquisition of hardware and software, and other related services such as trcining, instailation and programming. The contract components on oage 6 of the contract include all Items previously approved by Council for the fiscal year 1985 -86 budget and the upgraded CPU as approved by Council at its prior meeting. The contract documents have been reviewed by the City Attorney's office. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff reccmends approval of the attached greemeA— nts. Respectfu ly Su �.. Jack Lam, AICP Community Development Director JL:nas Attachments: Hardware and Software Agreements with ESRI and Henco a9� SOFTWARE/MARDWARE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this 7th day of May 1986, by and between City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 9320 Base tine Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 hereinafter referred to as the Client, and ESRi Systems, Inc. 380 New York Street Redlands, California 92373 USA TEL 714 - 793 -2853 TWx 910 - 332 -1317 hereinafter referred to as the Contractor, WHEREAS, required approval, clearance and coordination have been accomplished from and with pppropriate agencies; and yy. WHEREAS. the Contractor represents that it has title and /or eight to license certain geographic information system software as its +� Appendix A of this Agreement and to sell certain compu.er hardwa+- listed in Appendix B of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Client wishes to obtain a license for said,saftware and to purchase said hardware; and WHEREAS, the Contractor represents that it has the expertise to install said software and to train the Client's personnel in its use and that it can deliver to the Client said hardware; and WHEREAS, both the Client and the Contractor declare their intent to enter into an Agreement for licensing of said software and purchase of said hardware, as negotiated between the parties. NOW. THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covntants anJ •greements contained herein, the parties do hereoy agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 - SCOPE OF WORK The Contractor as an independent contractor and not as an agent of the Client shall in conformance with the schedule and sucn other provisions as are more particularly set forth herein and other mutually agreed to amendments, provide the necessary equipment, software, personnel, material and facilities (except as specified herein to be furnished by the Client; and do all things necessary and /or incidental to the accomplishment of the effort as set forth herein. 1 ID91 N ARTICLE 2 - PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE Contractor shall commence work after execution of this Agreement and complete the work as specified herein. Contractor shall generally adhere to the following schedule: ARTICLE 3- STATEMENT OF TASKS The Contractor shall perform three basic tasks as part of this effort. The tasks are: I. Install and test all hardware listed in Appendix 8 at the Client's office and train the Client's systems administrator and technical repr:sentative to the use and operation of the hardware. 2. Install software 7 sted to Appendix A. 3. Train users in use of Contractor - supplied software. Each task is separately discussed below in association with the responsibilities of the Contractor and Client and the deliverables to be provided. Task 1 - Installation of Equipment The Contractor shall install all equipment presented in Appendix B in the Client's designated office within 90 days (if possible) of signing this Agreement. Installation dates may be changed by mutual consent of the Contractor and the Client. This installation shall include unpacking, placemeit, and successful interfacing and testing of equipment according to standard procedures associated with each manufactured item of the system. 2 29;� ?4a CONTRACTED PERIOD TASK fQR_CORATr tT-- TARGET DATE Signing of Agreement TASK 1 Within 90 days of August 7 1986 9 Install Equipment execution of agreement* ' TASK 2 Within 170 days of September 7, 1986 Install Software execution of aqreement TASK 3 Within 150 days of October 7, 1996 Software Training execution of agreement *If possible - vendor dcpydent. ARTICLE 3- STATEMENT OF TASKS The Contractor shall perform three basic tasks as part of this effort. The tasks are: I. Install and test all hardware listed in Appendix 8 at the Client's office and train the Client's systems administrator and technical repr:sentative to the use and operation of the hardware. 2. Install software 7 sted to Appendix A. 3. Train users in use of Contractor - supplied software. Each task is separately discussed below in association with the responsibilities of the Contractor and Client and the deliverables to be provided. Task 1 - Installation of Equipment The Contractor shall install all equipment presented in Appendix B in the Client's designated office within 90 days (if possible) of signing this Agreement. Installation dates may be changed by mutual consent of the Contractor and the Client. This installation shall include unpacking, placemeit, and successful interfacing and testing of equipment according to standard procedures associated with each manufactured item of the system. 2 29;� ?4a Du-ing the installation period, the Contractor ,hall coordinate with and guide the Client's system administrator and technical •- representative on the installation, operation, and administration of the new hardware system. Th e Client will receive hands -on training and guidance from the Contractor as the two parties wcrk together on systems installation tasks. The Contractor has ultimate responsibility to install and test all hardware. The Contractor will be responsible for the satisfactory completion and instruction In the following tasks: - Starting up the system and individual devices and shutting them down in as orderly fashion. - Monitoring system status, including disks, assignable peripherals, user lines, print queues, and batch Job queues (sequential job processing). - Monitoring the system event tog. - Maintaining directories and files by creating, locating, deleting, protecting, passwording, and obtaining file and directory listings. - Performing ack -Wand recover -rte 9 y procedures. - Controlling printer operations. - Modifying user line and terminal settings. - Performing system crash recovery procedures. - Identifying, isolating and replicating user and system problems. Deliverables - Hardware System as specified in Appendix B. - Interfaced Hardware. - Performance (acceptance) Tests. - Users trained in operation of hardware. Responsibilitmes a. The Client shall provide persons to act as system administrator and technical representative who will learn the procedures for system installation, operation, maintenance coordination, and problem identification. 3 � 53 h 1: b. The Client shall, at Its own expense, prepare the designated site in accordance.with specifications and communications with a member of the Contractor's staff. These preparations shall include installation of appropriate electrical wiring, air conditioning, heating, humidity control, lighting and space for hardware components. These preparations shall not exceed the requirements for a standard office environment. c The Contractor shall coordinate the shipping, insurance and delivery of the various hardware components, including communication with the Client regarding appropriate logistics. d. The Client shall provide appropriate insurance coverage for the equipment after delivery. Contractor will provide insurance during transportation until delivery. Equipment will be delivered in non - damaged condition. e The Contractor shall provide an on -site specialist to interface the various hardware components, coordinate with the hardware vendor representatives to performing the various acceptance testing of each equipment component, and train the users to use of the hardware. s�Pl Acceptance of Equipment Equipment shall be accepted by the Client when the Contractor and Client shall jointly verify that the equipment is Installed and operating in accordance with the manufacturers' published specifications Task 2 - Install Software The ^ ontractor shall successfully install and test (on Contractor delivered ?ardware) all software outlined in Appendix A of this Agreement. Contractor •- chnical personnel will work on -site with system administrator and teu..4cal representatit -e who will be trained to maintain and support the sot,.-re syster., installed. Contractor shall deliver test data sets with the software and run a sample job run for each program to ensure each program is fully operational. Deliverables - Contractor software installed and tested on the specified computer system. - Training and orientation of system administrator and technical representative in installation and maintenance of software. - Two sets of system documentation. (One set only of IGL system and installation documentation.) �4^r, d 7 `y' Responsibilities a. Cont -actor will supply all materials for installation activities. b. The Client shall provide technical staff, as needed, including the Client system administrator and technical representative to work with Contractor's staff, install software, and learn basic maintenance and management procedures for software (approximately 24 hours time during the period of hardware and software installation). If software is to be installed on or interflced to client equipment not furnished by ESR1, Client technical staff shalt participate in the software installation and shall provide assistance in interfacing Contractor supplied software with Client's computer operating system and Client's peripheral devices. Client technical staff shall be available during training to assist with operating system adjustments, minor bug fixes, etc. Client shall provide system administrator level access to Contractor on its computer system and provide requested user accounts required for software installation purpossyonly. Acceptance of Software Software shall be accepted by the Client when Contractor and Client jointly run sample test job runs and jointly agree in writing that each module is fully operational according to the specifications listed in Appendix A. Task 3 - Train Sortware Users The Contractor shall train users in the operation of the software program installed as part of Task 2. The training program will be conducted at the offices of the Client or another mutually agreed convenient loction. The Clien• shall select no more than twelve of its staff for training. The Contractor shall present a general overview of each program and have each student use each program to solve a problem from the previously distributed problems set. The courses themselves will extend over a period of 10 class days. Deliverables - Users trained in use of ESRI software - 5 sets of user manuals - 12 sets of course materials Responsibilities a. The Contractor shall provide all training materials and a trainer for conducting the courses. `5 b. The Client shall provide a classroom equipped with large tables comparable to drafting tables, chalkboard, movable seats, terminals and computer time adequate to process various student ,tuts. Students should be able to leave their material in the classroom after the day's training. Additional sett of systems documentation, course materials, and user manuals are available at the following prices (subject to reasonable change after 90 days): GRID AND ARC MTFWO NETWORK System Documentation, per set of 1 $150 $20 - -- User Manual and Course Materials, per set of 1 $150 $50 $25 ARTICLE 4 - COMPENSATION The Client agrees to compensate the Contractor as follows for the complete system outlined in this Agreement: c�9b 6 AMOUNT a. ESR1 and RelatWSoftware Ligensesi S 32 000' b. dAidware and System Software .140,600° c. Custom Macro Development & Consulting Services S 15,000 d. Training /Instr'lation S 12.000 TOTAL $199,600 1 Appendix A lists software items. 2 Appendix B lists hardware items. * Includes 6% sales tax The schedule for remitting this compensation to Contractor is pr-sented below: APPROXIMATE DATE OF % OF EVENT COMPLETION OF EVENT AMOUNT t'OMACT Upon completion of initia- tion of this agreement Within 20 days* $ 19,960 10.0% Delivery of hardware Within 90 days* S 39,920 20.0% Installation of hardware Within 100 days* S 49,900 25.0% Installation of software Within 120 days* S 39,920 20.0% Upon completion of user training Within 150 days* S 34,900 17.5% Completion of custom programming Within 210 days* S =5,000 7.5% TOTAL $199,600 ' Of data of execution of contract c�9b 6 The Client's address ami contact person fcr receipt of invoices is designated fr. Appendix C. The Client agrees to pay all Contractor invoices within 36 days of receipt after completion of event ARTICLE 5 - NAROWARE WARRANTY AND MAINTENANCE Contractor warrants for 60 days from date of installation each of the hardware components furnished under this Contract to be free from defects in material and workmanship. ;ontractar's liability under this warranty is limited to servicing or adjusting *fly component returned by the Client to the factory for that purpose and t;o replace any defective parts therein. Contractor's warranty herein 1s the same as the manufacturer's warranty and runs simulr•eeously with manufacturer's warranty The Contractor shall develop with the Client's system administrator and technical representative the Client managed maintenance agreements with each hardware manufacturer for ongoing maintenance support at site, ,hould client so choose. ARTICLE 6 - SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND UPDATE SERVICE FOR INITIAL 12 -MONTH PERIOD— w 7 -t The Contractor will support /maintain the software for a period of 12 months following Installation. Software support and maintenance will apply only to urnWified software and to modifications incorporated and distributed by ESR1 'n .rpdated versions of the software. Standard software updates provide only for standard devices supported by the Contractor The Client 1s responsible for making or arranging for updates ,o interfaces for non - standard devices This maintenance and support will include the following: 1. Correction of malfunctions caused by incorrect coding or progrearitng. 2 Correction of functions which fail to perform as specified in supporting documentation. The Contractor also agrees to provide program corrections for any system errors reported amd determined to pe in the system documentation or operational procedures in the most expeditious manner possible and at no cost to the user for period of 12 months following Installation. In order to facilitate the orderly handling of problems which occur in the software, the following procedures will occur I. The Client will document any problem which occurs in the software with -espect to the specific data file on which it occurs. 2. The Client will attempt to replicate the problem using other tit data. 7 Qq _,7 3. The above mentioned documentation and testing will be forwarded to the Contractor's office for debugging of errors in a timely manner. The Contractor will correct the problem and return the corrections to the Client in a clearly documented form. During the period of maintenance and update service, the Contractor shall be available to assist in debugging or answering user questions regarding software operation by telephone consultation on weekdays between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time. The C14ent's GIS Consultant or System Administrator designated in Appendix c shall mail or telephone problems or questions to the ESRI User Coordinator, 360 flew York Street, Redlands, California 92373, Telephone (714) 793 -8971. In additinn, the Contractor will deliver to the Client all updates to the software which are distributed within 12 months following installation. The 12 month period will commence on the final dhte of the scheduled training program unless otherwise specified in this Agreement. These updates will be sent to the Client's Sy.:tem Administrator designated IRV*Pendix C. ±y ARTICLE 7 - SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND UPDATE SERVICE AFTER INITIAL. 12-MOUTH PERIOD The Contractor agrees to provide and the Client agrees to accept the above maintenance and update service beyond the 12 months for an annual fee, at client's discretion. The current annual maintenance and update service fee is listed in Appendix A. ARTICLE 8 - SUPPLY OF CONVERTED, EXTENDED AND NEW RELATED SOFTWARE If requested, the Client agrees to provide Contractor with a copy of converted, revised and /or new GIS software developed in conjunction with Contractor provided software cperating on the Client's hardware as well as copies of any documentation relevant to such software. The expenses incurred in conducting such transfer shall be charged to the lontractor on a reimbursable basis. In the case where the Client oroviOes Contractor with software resulting from conversion, revision, extension or new creation, said software shall be available without cost or with nominal cost to other GIS software users upon request. ARTICLE 9 - SOFTWARE USE AND TRANSFER RIGHTS The Contractor grants the Client the non - exclusive, non- transferable license to use the software listed in Appendix A as delivered at the time of installation and updated by subsequent Contractor software releases. Each software license granted under this Agreement authorizes the Client to use the licensed software packagye in any machine- readable form on a single central processing unit (CFU) designated by type and serial number. A separate license or amendment to this Agreement is required for each additional CPU on which the licensed software package will be used, PROVIDED that the license 8 d7S granted under this Agreement for the designated CPU may be temporarily transferred to one back -up CPU whil^ the designated CPU is inoperative due to a malfunction. The Client may redesignate the CPU on which a licensed software package is used by notifying ESRI in writing at least ten (10) days prior to the redesignation and by paying ESRI such fees as may be due if the redesignated CPU capacity is larger than that of the originally designated CPU. If ESRI software is used on a processing unit in addition to the designated CPU, then the Client shall pay to the Contractor an additional license fee equal to 50% of the ESRI software list price at the time the additional license is purchased. The fees for additional installation of INFO and Tektronix IGL software shall be in accordance with the discount policies then in effect by Henco, Inc. for INFO and Tektronix for IGL. The contractor agrees to provide professional services for installing, noving, reinstalling and /or training in use of said software within new or relocated Client sites for costs not to exceed standard Contractor labor rates, travel and per diem. ARTICLE 10 - STATEMENT OF fVRIETARY INTEREST 'T1 The Client agrees that all software licenses by way of this Agreement, and all Contractor documentation, is proprietary to the Contractor and are and shall remain at all times the property of the Contractor. The Client shall be responsible to ensure that its employees do not disclose any proprietary information or material to any unauthorized individual, institution, company or government agency or in any way transfer this software or any hybrids of the same without written permission of authorized Contractor personnel unless required by law or a court of competent ,jurisdiction. The restrictions shall include: software, file structures, documentation, algorithms, related software concepts, software program corrections, and updates. The Client agrees that copies of all licensed software received from the Contractor or made by Client for any purpose authorized by the Agreement are, and shall remain at all times, the property of Contractor. The Client agrees that its obligations of confidentiality described heretofore in this article are binding to perpetuity and as such survive the term of this Agreement. ARTICLE 11 - ADDITIONAL GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEH HARDWARE It is agreed that in the event that the Client desires system upgrades or an additional hardware system, that the Contractor shall have the right to submit a proposal for this. ARTICLE 12 - ONGOING SERVICES The Contractor shall provide the Client with on -call support services not otherwise covered in this agreement with scheduling to be agreed upon by both parties, in the following areas: 4 a. Contract digitizing and processing. b. Use of electrostatic plotting. .- c. Programming assistance for macro development and systems consulting in the amount of $15,000. The cost of ongoing services will be in accordance with the Contractor's most current rate s0edule at the time the services are performed. ARTICLE 13 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION The Client's Contract Administrator hereunder is designated n Appendix C. The Contractor's Contract Administrator hereunder is S. J. Camarata, Jr. ARTICLE 14 - TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE The Client's System Administrator and Technical Representative who will participate during system installation, be available as system administrator during trainimin and who will be the primary technical a� contact with the Contractor-for user support and software updates under this Agreement is designated in Appendix C. The Contractor's Technical Representative under this Agreement is Clint Brown. The Technical Representatives shall represent the ,Contract Administrators in the technical phases of the work; however, the Technical Representatives shall not be authorized to change any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Such changes, if any, shall be made only by the Contract Administrator or by his authorized representative by a properly executed modification to this Agreement. ARTICLE 15 - ACCEPTANCE OF WORK Acceptance of all reports and services shall be made by the Client's Contract Administrator. ARTICLE 16 - EXTENSION, MODIFICATION. AND TERMINATION OF CONTRACT Additional specifications consistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement relating to details of time, task breakdown, or other matters related to accomplishment of the work to be provided hereunder not specified in this Agreement, may be added to this Agreement through agreement by both parties by a properly executed modification. ARTICLE 17 - TAX APPLICABILITY The 7ontractor has included within the contracted price any sales tax an 1s bound by the laws, rules and regulations of the appropriate taxing agency regarding such matters. If the Client agency is exempt from certaln taxes, the Client shall furnish to the contractor evidence 10 Sao a of its exemptions from any Federal, State or local taxes. Such certificates shall be furnished to the Contractor upon execution of this -- Agreement. Any additional permit fees and licensing costs incurred in Contractor's performance of the work to be provided hereunder not specified in this contract shall be borne by Contractor. ARTICLE 18 - LIMITS OF LIABILITY The Contractor shall not be liable to the Client related to the use by the Client of the equipment, licensed programs or licensed materials, except software maintenance defined in Articles 6 and 7. ARTICLE 19 - DELIVERY 19.1 Suspension of Work or Delivery. The Client may suspend work or delivery dates upon thirty (30) days writen notification to Contractor. Contractor shall be liable for delays in manufacturing and delivery, unless due to strikes, acts of God, public calamity. or other causes beyond Contractor's reasonable control. Upon thirty (30) days prior notice, however, Client may authorize a delay by Contretttor which would otherwise be prohibited T: herein. Contractor, however; shall assume responsibility for delays caused by its suppliers, sub - contractors, or other providers of any materials or services required by this Agreement The date of delivery in the event of excused delays shall be postponed by the sane number of calendar days as work was extended or delivery was suspended. ARTICLE eu - INFRINGEMENT PROTECTION 20.1 Patent, Trademark. or Copyright Royalties Any and all royalties or other charges for patent, trademark, or copyright to be provided hereunder shall be considered as Included in the contract price, except that both parties may, in the future, mutually agree on payment to Client of royalties as compensation for certain software development initiated t) Client if a part of a separate Joint development agreement. ARTICLE 21 - PATENT. TRADEMARK COPYRIGMT INFRINGEMENT Contractor hereby expressly earrants that it has sole proprie.ary interest in and to any and all software it shall supply to Client under this Agreement, excepting such software for which a license or other permission has been obtained and terms of such license or permision have been full,, d'sclosed to Client in writing. Contractor shall indennify, defend, end save harmless C- ent and its elected officials, officers, employee: -, and agents against all claims and any and all judgments, costs, daaages, and expenses which may be awarded against Client , its elected cfflcials, officers, employees or agents, in any suit, action, or proceeding brought for infringement or alleged infringement of a patent, trademark, copyright, or other proprietary interest by a court of competent jurisdiction, arising out of the use of the materials, software, and /or other equipment furnished hereunder for the purposes 11 3d / herein intended. If any suit or suits for infringement of a patent, trademark, copyright or other p.oprietary interest in instituted as above specified due to the use of said software, materials, or other equipment furnished pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor shall provide written notification within thirty (30) days of actual notice received by Contractor as to any such suit or suits and Contractor shall immediately assume the Client's defense of such suit or suits and all expenses incidental to the defense thereof, including attorney's fees. Client shall cooperate in good faith in its own defense; however, unless Client shows good cause so as to provide otherwise. Contractor shall have control of such defense and Client shall be kept fully informed as to the progress of such litigation. If Contractor is enjoined software or other materials Injunction, as of the effective terminating this Agreement by alternative software or othc Agreement, subject to all condi this Agreement and all attacl discretion, said alternative se satisfactory to Client,�ptrac failing to prortde the specie originally purchased under thii costs necessary to purchase, tr or materials in accordance with and Warranty provisions herein. from providing Client with any of the required under this Agreement, such date thereof shall be deemed grounds for Client. However, Contractor may offer r materials as required under this ttons, provisions, and specifications of vents hereto. If, in Client's sole ftware or materials perform in a manner ;or shall be relieved from liability for -Tx 'ic software nodule or other material Agreement. Contractor shall bear all insport, Install, and test such software the Standard of Performance, Acceptance ARTICLE 22 - TERMINATION BY THE CITY If Contractor fails to commence performance hero out the provisions of the Agreement within the t, herein, or otherwise ceases performance prior to tol all obligations hereunder, it shall be given fifteen notice that further failure to carry out the pr Agreement may result in termination by the Client Contractor falls to conform to the provisions of thl notice, Client may, at its option: (1) terminate a Agreement, or (2) take over and do all or part of th in the Warranty and Remedy provisions of this Agreemen In accordance with the RFP, and subject to the yrovided herein, Client shall be the sole ,fudge as to been noncompliance with the Agreement as to warr termination, or (2) its completion without such termi damages, pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, Agreement is intended to in any way prejudice eithe Client's right to pursue Its remedies in a court of 1 provisions of Client's RFP preempt and govern where the terms and conditions contained to Contractor's prof 12 3 as order or to carry (lines specified I fulfillment of 15) days written risions of this In the event Agreement after or part of the work as provided provisions there has subjectito ng in this actor's or terms and stent with ARTICLE 23 - ASSIGNMENT OR SUBCONTRACTING Neither this Agreement not any portico thereof may be assigned or subcontracted by Contractor without first obtaining the written consent of the Client. Any attempt by Contractor to assign or subcontract any performance of this Agreement without the written comiient of the Client shall be null and void and shall constitute a hreach of this Agreement. In the event Client authorizes any portion of 'he work to be performed hereunder to be performed by any subcontractor Contractor shall require such subcontractor to comply with all aplicable provisions of this Agreement, including but not limited to, those provisions pertaining to insurance, warranty and confidentiality. ARTICLE 24 - NON - DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CLIENT All cards, tapes, disks, other media, processes, reports, information and data of any kind that are made available by Client or that become available to Contractor by virtue of this Agreement or the relationship created by this Agreement, shall forever be held in strictest confidence by Contractor, its officers, employees, sub- contractor and agents. Contractor warrants that it shall make no disclosures or publications offrWpy information or data of any kind which is deemed by law to be confidential or which Client specifies as confidential. Contractor shall indemnify, save harmless and defend Client its elected officials, officers, employees and agents including the payment by Contractor of any and all legal costs and attorneys fees, from all liability from loss, damages, or other injuries to persons or property in any manner arising out of or incidental to disclosures or publications by Contractor, its officers, employees, sub - contractor or agent, of any information or data of any kind which is deemed by law to be confidential or whicn Client specifies as confidential. There are no time limits governing the provisions of this paragraph. Contractor shall incorporate the provisions of this section in all authorized sub- contracts. ARTICLE 25 - INDDINITY Contractor shall hold free and harmless, defend, and indemnify Client, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents against all loss, damage, expense and liability arising out of, or in any way connected with, the installation, supplying, Inspection, testing, instruction or other work performed by Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or representatives, excepting only such injuries or damages as may be caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of Client. Contractor shall, on Client's request, defend against any suit asserting a claim covered by this indemnity. Notwithstanding Contractor's duty to defend Client as herein provided. Contractor shall pay all costs that may be incurred by Client in enforcing these indemnity provisions, including actual attorney's fees. 13 3Ln 3 ARTICLE 26 - INSURANCE Contractor shall not commence work under thia Agreement until it has obtained all insurance referred to in the RFP and required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to Client, nor shall Contractor allow any subcontrctor to comaence work on a subcontract until all Insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. The Contractnr shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: A. Worker's Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, Contractor s a urn sn 'o E a ter state of insurance as proof that It has taken out full Workers' Compensation Insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the wor), specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the period covered by this Agreement. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Contractor, prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with G-"t a certificate as follows: ±� •I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement.• B. Throughout the Lena of this Agreement, at Contractor's sole cost and expense, Contractor shall keep or cause to be kept in full force aad effect, for the mutual benefit of Client and Contractor, comprehensive, brood form, general public liability and automobile Insurance against claims and liability for personal Injury, death, or property damage arising from Contractor's activities in connect +on with 'his Agreement, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily Injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage. All insurance required by this Agreement shall name Client, its elected officials, officers, employees and agent3 as additional Insureds and shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business In the State of California. All such policies shall conta,n language to the effect that (1) the Insurer waives the right of subrogation against Client and Client's agents and representatives, (2) the policies are primary and non - contributing with any insurance that may be carried by Client , and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty 30) days prior •ritten notice by the insurer to Client. Contractor shall furnish Client with copies of all required policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificates evidencing the Insurance, prior to commencement of its performance as herein required. Contractor may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 14 3D y ARTICLE 27 - APPLICABLE LAWS The laws of the State of California and rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto. shall be applied in the interpretation, execution and enforcement of this Agreement. ARTICLE 28 - ENTIRE AGREEMENT The fully executed Henco Software, Inc. License Agreement, User Sublicense Agreement, and Software Sublicense Type - IS, attached hereto, all constitute the complete agreement between the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the first day above written. ES RI SYSTEMS INC. ontractor By Date 15 TUre—nt'r— Date 3oS Ys. APPENDIX A SOFTWARE TO BE INSTALLED SYSTEM SOURCE MC ESRI INFO HENCO IGL TEKTRONIX NETWORK ESRI SOFTWARE ITEMIZED COST MC /INFO with IGL Software License Fee, $32,000.00 Installation, Training and First year's Support Current Annual Software $ 6,000.00 Support Fee for Maintenence and Uodate Service NETWORK No charge $1,000.00 NOTE: The software licensti under :his agreement includes only those software packages listed above. The system program sumnaries listed on the following pages may list other systems which are not licensed under this agreement. .386 1 0 4 APPODIR A (cont'd) ARC SISSEM PROGRAM SBMARIES Edit Coverage - Create and modify a coverage by digitizing features, deleting features, and modifying features. This is an Interactive graphics program used for all manual digitizing and edit. which fa Display Coverage - Generate a thematic map of a coverage. Capabilities Include pole[, line, and Polygon symbolism, centroid lab, and dCapabil functions. In addition, various types of errors can be detected and flagged on the dlspla.y. Label Coverage - this process analyzes the coverage geometry as digitized with the edltor. it detects and assigns unique Identifiers to all Polygons is the coverage. The process also generates an error report and plot ehouing possible polygon a ors, such as more than one can" _VA per polygon, etc. 77 a Transform age - Apply a map pro - action or coordinate transformation to a coverage. Perform standard map projections and inverse map projections. Generalize a Coverages - Generalize line detail In a coverage. Overlay Coverages - Combine two coverages to create a third composite coverage. Perform Boolean AND, ORs NOT to select resulting polygons. Datermine attribute files for overlay coverage from input attributes. Dissolve e_ Coverage - Aggregate polygons for a coverage on the basis of polygon attribute to create a now coverage. For example, aggregate counties to states. Merge Coverages - Combine adjoining coverages to form a larger composite covorgge. Filter Covers e - Select features from a coverage on the basis of attribute codas e•R•, from land use coverage create urban coverage by selecting urban codes. Buffer Coverage - Create buffer zone polygons at various specified distances around ARC features and create appropriate attributes. Coverage nnagemeut - Create, delete, copy and rename coverages and the associated attribute files. Nom-Dlgitired Coverage Creation - Interactively input coordinatas and attributes to create coverages. C -1 A -Z 7/83 307 Appendix A Contiaued ARC 5YSTF4 PRJCRAM SUl:NRIES (Contin ed) Process Survey Traverses - Interactively Input, codify, combine and list survey traverses. In addition, traverses may be converted to coverages and vice versa. I; SYSTEM_ SUMIARY ICL - Provides I/O device drivers and primary command sat of graphic calls for use with gta;hic CRTs and certain hardcopy devices. C -1 d 3 o S 7 /E5 s Appendix A Continued INFO PROGRAM. SUNNARIES Define Attributes - Identify the attributes to be associated with each feature. Attribute Entry - Rey entry procedure (fpm fill out style) for attribute tile. verification done on entry. List Attribute, - Generate lilting of feature attributes. Update Attributes - Replace selected feature attributes with correct values. Relate Attributes - Associate Snforma,:on with a data file on the basis of a code. For example: giveq an attribute file with terrain unit number as one field ae-!6 file of terrain unit code s�y terrain unit number, the terrain units could be a Inserted in the attribute rile. Calculate Attribute - Determine a new feature coda by combination of exleting feature codea� IAolots function (described above) Ss also useful In this eontaxe. This fa used for numerlc .adeling. ABgreRat oAAMib to _ perform thematic aggregation of coverage attributes county population to state population). Attribute counterpart of dissolve. Diseagreaate Attri:ute - perform population thematic diaaggrogation o[ coverage attributes (a.g., state popuon to county populaeL:n). Attribute counterpart of dissolve. Select - Saint specific records from an attribute file an the basis of feature aetci buts:. Ate rib counterpart of tile. Beport Aetrl6uees - Generate statistical reports of polygon attributes. Extensive capability for report formatting, subtotal:, ate. C -1 A -4 7/85 !'f Appendix A Continued NETWORK SYSTEM SUlN.ARY 1. :,eneral SY2tee is capable of creating analysis and displays of A topologically correct Network consisting of links and nodes commonly found in transpnrtaticn Necuorka. 2. Data Rase Characteristics a) Utilizes standard topological Network of links and nodes Including U.S. Census DINE piles. C -1 ._ 37 T 7,85 V .`f b) Operates on file containing attributes of street mm s, addresses, sad related attribuwlt _ C) Integrates with both cartographic software ae well as tabular dau, Management software. 3. Data Entry a) Allows for crmlon of topological Network (using cartographic systea). b) ellows for autonettc verification that Network 1s coMplete and c) correct. Allows for interactive editing and update of Network (using cartographic systen). d) Allows for Interface with U.S. Census DIlte piles. 6. Network lfaaloulatlon Y r a) Selection of sub - Networks from overall Natwork based on link attributes. ' ti b) Aggregation of detailed Network to generalized Network. c) Allocation of demand from a population distributed to the Network to specified 'facilities' where demand can be satisfied (i.a., fire stations. � s l u Of total demand al ocated, average diintencoc o demand, MaxlmwMldlecs, Including demand, etc. It Is capable of single and Multiple facility allocation. C -1 ._ 37 T 7,85 V .`f I Appendix A Continued N MRK SYSTFN CC.:dARY (Continu d) d) Generate time /distance /cost sheds from a given origin /origins. e) Record number of Influenced units with individual cumulative sheds f) Determine optimum and alternative paths /rout,• through the Network. g) Input node points of a boundary of a Network file (user - selected polygon) and Collapse all segment, inside this boundary and summarize accumulated values aosociated with these segments (I-e-, number of students by age category). This results in a Its ng of all accumulated values. h) Allocate fac111 tttt��based or demand values associated with Network fill, links and time dl1tance values for Network file links (to be used In locating facilities such as schools, parka, or fire ststioas). 1) provide computer rcutine for route selection for vehicles using computer Interaction to assist an analyst In selecting routes ouch as school buses, garbage trucks, etc This Is not Intended to be fully automated route selection, but a tool to assist in the route selection process. S. Network DfaEaz a) Number plotting associated with Network. b) Directional flow indicaelon. e) Indication of association between Network links and facilities. G -1 A -g 7/g5 311 { APPENDIX 8 HAADHARE TD BE INSTALLED QUANTITY MODEL E9UTPMENT DESCRIPTION 1 Prime 2655 with: - 4 MB Memory - 315 H8 Disk - 32 Asynchronous Lines - PT 200 CRT - Streaming Tape Drive - Operating System 16 CBL6124 -003 10 Meter Asynchronous Cable 1 4107 Tektronix Color 3raphics CRT 1 4695 Color Hardcopy Device I 9136 ckltt 0,gitizer /DraftingN Table 2 Hire= Selanar Monochrome Graphics CRT 8 8 Channel Multiplexors 6 PT200 Prime Alphanumeric CRT e an cilrnt sa comma ❑•..•lo .Mtl c tsar Sahvar...... MINIM """ATM hrttelpstoa In Spat" Installation Alta ap ST,t,p Adallpl ac"t•r dut(0S Tra let,, Act: a rrloary T..tal[al Ceeuc[ vttk Ell, or Dlu,lkoter John Arc_ h of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road strut A.Cl... Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 !q uto St, 714 / 989 -1851 Aru mod• INn. [•vapv STSTM ADa.SISTUMM t not t -lcay p,pro...tort") 'Auto.. and IastU1. Dpdu. ra<bp Act# : a 0......., S1.bv Sp.eld L c cenrllNU. acrd v. to aalot.M.0 Toward. Snap Qo..[loeo is O'I or 9320 Base Line Road 34e..t wra•. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 714 / 989 1851 Aba Cod• Ikon. �� 4bblvp cif WaSD -" tpc.lnr a..r Doc".nut1" T---rd- u"r Qu ... tons to [Sal or Dlurlk.ty, `�q�y lent,*• Ott luypq.�ifit0u aof "u. Tacaq.NNMM{t.. fl ll��� �orknr John Arch, MY of Rancho Cucamonga aw 9320 Base Line Road fteu[ Amnu Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Icy $,•to t ,14 / 989 -1851 r A," Red. rk "a 4bN1ov [raTaAR . -yis =fit aa.tnlrt•u yre"ut Jerry Fullfood, City of Rancho Cucamonga on 9320 Base Line an.A stmt Addnu Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91;30 It 7147 989 1851 p La[rN100 " Vv"! Socu1.D 12 SM ?"Olets[ of 9320 Base Line Road tr.re dru. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C3[1 lbLn Alp 714 / 989 -1851 ttbbiop CIS CO3S01TAar Cltut N/ D•aybts Dlfluut Tuplo to Act a CIS consultants no va,tew O'I ratkAaes onto a. A'C /1310. XXTIM". O Cw..tc. Seftuar. racks,. Gass s.:oc Ada,aA: atr i.eo v Iron tvd. !Sono C[c.Nl" 11ua. "nd "T lotort h.,S. "llf(eatlonn as t "pep o7f Uto) t7, 9 f-an la OR: . 330 av Ter S.t. 4dlno. G1•ctukl adlltf "al S910 p1 "ta 7)). Cop t" 1317. ULpp "o 3/3 �K- IIENCO SOFTN%A RE. INC. LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR INDIRECT LICENSEES Ni lCO SOFTWARE. I%C a Muut imam wrpermos 100 Fifth Attain Nagai %Ics,NNI 011A atrrtaae, call N a - LKrnserl.amaF,NgNE, ESRI International, Inc. 380 'law York St•eet Redlands, CA S2373 laumtafter nfarnd nil (sill mine, w grant." a City of Rancho Cucamonga, California P 0. Box 607, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 NnrtaUr ceftrna le aa'L.tNserl mane N uttp on UA felleaml Itmn 11M Nndaeot for roncamtin a rat f..b beal • sawatlw I Utmr to Use seta LKcesee Prolnm oa Dtupnalte 14WPMCM at tit Nnh in this Alrcrmcng eve hey MUJ 3NUNI UN, . 1 DEFTNTIO%S The reae..nl aims an arfnro fee IN paueses of IM, Almm u at Itill t -L....d Prelnm• dish be carp pNlnm auwnrte m Schow, I hemo to mulum ,cew, oaea We lee ill team J Cher a IU e, a bseratmR d LKrmon pin Wutweeml am oarnnwl mrewc lon,l N Me aNlnm and iel .shard. r tehamro. ar ec. Pollam of pnlnm p.Nw, he"(.. Iamtbro N LKCpKe n Nowell ads the LKtesee Pralms L 'Oruleued Escpm ot'shaa IN the semnl pmnue/ aaa •nwearuro by medal maewammar. age unal hamper m Shell S N.I.I. With IN, pfmr.ntia ""i el Dalnbmor aNKh aopraaI mall tsot be onmuably..uUM. Licatea an disc{• me a. Neipmeat ape -.Nigh • 1 meted Pralram an U Used muse aid n nplae,mem of Pnrmwy Dtpinaud EaWp• Nam lrcensee may Bawl we r,NNN w 11 el mamaNWN, aNI anal tsamesr I •Uggl cal aappel pay POmee of ae/ Lcfasep Pralram fnm N.,.en, be mroimNN INNI(a, M,W gaol by marhemsel rtmneu. a as ether meant 6 -S)tuaa EeUetrnm• thaU .we aeT me lf-Il ts by her Lutwel Pnanm .itch a IN upanill pared• s" 1 TERN• The Alsegraw n wfmm (Nth tU ass w cecataw Nthn Amimas by Lcrnler. This Almmtet aM any Lxrnse Inglro r UnenOn mat U urm,alro by Luo1LD -L'eut Ndt N mmpl •tm a 11 of me term, aea rommoa hicil aW by Gary*.., perHaw to lar pfoalueA of Sm1en a. fKrmt pnmtd Mnn ana nosh 1a nth Lta -]td Pm/nm loan rema,e to f0,[b Yebl �C LoeW .14 co dates Use w Wt an" Prelnm our IN Drulutro Escorting a maid LaNwil l IWVn to camps an aeF W tU mmi one teWwaa of lbu 42. an" * S LICENSE The LKCnse (noted aide, the, Atrmml awNenc s LKNiL on is sagaeadeu,e ban to Use 1111 Local Pnantst to ay macho mdabk fares - -IT as sae wnnaLar Onrgeatro INNINm. A sepal Us. n rNmrre for Use of each Latased Pralram en snorting wirer than Drulatro Escorts a DELIVERY Dnnbwer apes to drbwnhe alma Nower of NOn of ram Lrcamro program.ubu Nal lbl are or the aRmm au of dYS Aymm�l rolnesr ..a one gory rata W sU VW Ntaawl ana Loaaml lalramose (heath Leamre Prolnm ana Nigh a add"ead daamuuauots a, Di —Itwer tea dorm apprep,ult " S. PRICE For ao Coated Prelnm, J....d re Laaesee. Lccesea chip pry DntnOaror. ge sae arms of Samoa 6 &NOE she oral msmroaLal See Article 4 and Appendix A ' NT Unkta amrmtu leaned by Dntnbumr. psymtal for a rope or a L am as aye Many (1O)daa on" dt0nry to 1 L.N. sell Ihm11701 do,, w No gee d helm to ... srM as Nd nem 1• G ur,verhargr. , 1 HR)Ftt maala f Sb,M aeF amour mat yr lnrmrng rrman 11111 111 fat a puree of uw> a as din Umnbwer ski Me, les nlal 10 Alntmtw. ba11Kh mmtNnee ihaa gw nhne LKrnYt el LKtmea s 1oa,tw tt d.; Nmpis .rah W mail rests appbuhk PNNNAu of this AS.a m iLL T. TRA141NO DmnhaNr arts to pn,de aM Limmess is came N amp, NNI W Ne Use of Na tsrvw Pto,em as pis ' scheal I. "bar it Duutbngal emown a a Lkeeseel pmm— he IN pawn thin nisi If Ua cal was plw a Lkaaray pnmut, Lkcau IU11 pay DWnbata for mNeable food. Nepal. Il ana menu, sear, NeNn a bT Diunbutarl empN>nt If titmal tabs, Plan at Dnuawon PININA . sal rapRNW lmmnro by Ucinserl rmpal IUR b beta by Ixrmn. X AddluoW mseinl may be charm( Ives .t0 be PrecteN by Datnbaor at a all ehw, to LJttnt, Used a DiunUNet mN pe m •a .nmul nut S L Dr 'RIeUT10N OF CORRECTIONS AND ENHANCE-41i FURTHER SIAMENANCE. For • plNe of da moose fnm No IN of thta Alntmtel. Onmbwor all Cal to dmnawe. .show charge We Lkebwr, hey rani eonenleR.bub come Oo- Inbalaet ngielm4 by ao] mesa, .arch appbn ro thaw LKtmra Plelnma -Wind bf LKanser. aid Ibl to alunbau..ehow al le • le LKa Hal as System ERhammet sack i'Icamil la Lega l eenf,mton as emnbtd N SearoW 1 Ume, My Uuued a" PMMM m ff" a alwauM by aA heir Iw aamn or S,Iem Eoaamemaet marl W eo.o u as Deatrd LeNwee PN/nm. P Any Upaaud Llnuro Prelnm pn,lded by DLLtnbwor under tU tams w (We Nos 0 ruWdero a Li and PNlram ra IM potpan K haw Alarm Jt Distributor alas to proVidr "Issued asiRuaen of the Lkcaree PNpamt Ndwnj Eraar Ceamleat Sptcm ERhegaamcatr. (; r Updwed Lhceed Prolnm. and widw d aLaled mauml an the arms and ea -dneea a Iau units The fun aaaaweal mdwayea ' pmoe ,UR US" '"N"A "Nseca a of ma ,ta thumb fm maNteam pasted "'i by Late INN 60 J prbr N U..e dais Lk. aaa pad DisnOmer .mots amear tba Lmatr .ohs to urmttseu aitmtuere f' Dmnhwor an ARtsul Mai,Ituan Fee as I facelbe S i IN A w a Italian, F A! 1 I J rF 1 me feao t• STl ,ea Up I f e M d� DL7 R[V 1 /IS f Annul \W -rNwe Fee n I'll" wrttm 11241 a the lh,n arrem /WI a.I Kr <u LKt11 %1i pr0[nm DYRnaNd q LKtnRr YIIKn rKn.n INMIrNNI MI \Ram D) a Hr LKIM(d Pram Ftu LUtp.R See Article 4 and Appendix A The ..nut pined pram' [ The II.IYI nuieleeame In n 0."et4 0e lee spew u r ( ) x, mnmrurce .Ill be amomnha0) ream.ae.oe a 17•maela eetu taha LRleua the". mm . I(urct p K the eep, -et. a a ne. 12.monrx Y.mltn aotee Ia r naa n° bur Dap M da >. anti to If We Leased for sex al mumaarcti If Lessee 0°m' eat uramu maM umnn In er fm for ire IS mead ma�numrcr . al0rru�0. DI^Inpwam on LKem tared.. IW eel Drum' ab ud fsn IeeU ee anpk p LK, wood en an annul eeux . p gaud ma fecrad P > Due ee It .hie 10 dap Iron Ipe eepx.. If If Lamm.. ... as .... new as Caw Med In tae Pmte..p pntn Dh am Ieemfln..Ieen to Hume maw(v see abed PSY DII,nemOl In addltl. 10 M M. w..... aa.altmrce feet. a mam hre, L.C. rum- polity fam ewk thufn pion [halt. paid u ch. LRtewel IN. e dal dulw aNU pan lhi nab brarctl aaauNrct.hhom pnor.ml <n naue.dw)mtntuoet aide amok.. MdaP eflM dam mu. An a-lmb a any lied Prm.dN to LRem a by Dlhnbmam 01 Lueewr tit say llme he [am m,a..ah... mi'mcmece um[n art PnprKnm Inlermalwn a Laemor, are am aAtU be aU ume r,eum the pnpem inkly of Letmar, am an prmda to Late• see I.b" I° the "Ida"M Pro.NOea e/ tan APnrmeµ irclpdiN aiaam awn Paraen arc demand le wnwale Laid protnu bmeuuo° lee proalueas of S... 10 h""t am fam Hnleee thhhIwam tat Li othent than M W b4 to Lbumea for .y lamina la kraut ar wmawaeul been or demotic monR hoe. ar moen(rlm .nh ay auwtNeK um'uo PrOayld la Laate. y Danpmea or LKeaw as any ume 0r the use em bppNa- uee br Laesee p/ eq maunab of ay !W prolNm Ie Lamed h1 DlunOwer am lxenwr.p tar <ti1nl a awn m:urtum. seamen ACCEPTANCE Attrpurct by LRaRe at any LRentd P"tnrp, U,valld Laeud Protrta. w reblm aettmtl fnm Onlnbmer I bia ee dammed aommItO nwaK a Leeaten .Haman, lhi1 Ib letax let tub LRnmed PfGSNM Updated! Lavead pratnes, ar Armed metemb a puma ubn IN Imam+ of thu Apmmtµ 10 P40PRIETARY RIGHTS TO AND PROTECTION OF LICENSED PROGRAMS. Lkmm,e +prtn 11ut hie Lweud paean Vpdwb L.mad P.,e mt ab nblN d uueN eusub..m amhn vuts(ul Wa/mauot of L.lmar+b an +m IIUU rtmD7p m e ueua the r DrmeON to LR[mme htnt°drr are pmphim Y u rranitme tint to mIW a or +POty n dal in aeIt th teeowlr /.sky or Lateen Linew aSnn 10 mvae an swh euteeul malt atubhk ant Iamb propnnaty InferNlwa, n 83' f nw a Zhu Aptrmmµ LRma— lanhn apeIn met to prorde w emPlwrn Rllhppt pnpf.(eneteeVm( rein LRe -ar, erKpl nE I f inrwn OlhrIYamDWlpale Lk ""` wfar perewalUy m blN le lKN a awb (pW rtm.0 Lk.- propu anwa y nurave� tneateu amid L rm le D D n Lnn DroptT u-It I a. apuem ubn Wa A D Wr um aamu w awiontie: ee[aN1 a�ah Pwpm.. INwmab FrKR'- m.Ipnhnllee, III,I mm1na110Nm pame hill um.0 N area.. aak� of LKWT Laepm thiuhu ee my e-u,ul pro.edm to LKtpsee Nnamtt art m wade be LKlatee fa tie t LRletee fmI stutpen a1 lReutl PrOlrams nreM fom LKtme, rpaee ambomad ee. nt are am .0 n.. be aU Ilay. t� new al v vets ar 11 USE OF LICE \SED PROGRAMISI ON OTHER THAN DESIGNATED EQUIPMENT Daniel pmads arampMe am panW maF frrclwe of Dtotmml E,Mmum mme a itheNM to U. tamy Laesed Propnm an tiler egat a cminpict, or nun Uu o lemppnry M mt.. a T E Pan.. a aulfaarupe a Deu pseud Egwpa[et 12. GEOGRAPHIC AREA. The Lem h, is aMO.M w Use the Lammed pretnmb) anti ahem the time detulbd In Srbndala t. 17. COPIES AND 1111, (al ATIONS Any Lttated re, only be wphd y License. In whale 0, u Faro la printed tie marbfee naLpl. Perm, nettle for LasuA Use am dal/ fa ose e° Dtugmud E4.p—m prom... hear,,. this an men Ihin Rn D) Pn°Itd am fin ISI°..(hewmltbknpureva be Ne-u.me whbrnpemmany Lamm Pmtnm. ay ..sew intent a LKttiw. time then wpm nerdem ea Dmupmlb EgwP°uat Uun end awn "ud tW ub wkly fee t. Ph"'i and muse'mForn farm =AY=a(L proudm d P apse In inmlmue° a the 1. faire to, he .. Ula Pie °tern d We °leer P,opam aaterub w Ic felony • mend from Iht mbdud pact sm eme"' u d Pmmswe 10 amdf had heir bit it Sm. the Any con ndd m wIa ee am. HIM a IN. Atonement" Propaa, ar pan h nal- IhaU be Head day ee Del-soned Equpnyne, •W than remme,,ejeirele He p Uh Ine"of"t pail ' -p am maddcane.. a LaelmN homed a no ..t rap.n a Lkaud Propaml .hkp U main 1° tam fame, It TIME SHARING. ETC_ A Lkeeud Protnnr thin oat be .hbred by LK,mn on eeeen of any tithed Paws or ores teem fw evapk, m a two "pah"S Iua of aKnuan, wahew tee "pone .nine teetotal a LKcuw IL RECORDS t umer �u I�mol (ammo of m-5.0y ld, ne E se orb Licensed Prctnm• the D-lam d egmpmmm .m IN jbInU IOUlna as tae or. n mar Krd fde the"em"'d P-1-M tm meld .wk mom" snekbb to Llwolaa dma rt L n t of -Pen am anhem kL Lk[ mm ,h a ban Ha "IM M u awn Kptnte 10 audd 10 mcm, a tee Llr[as a Maus tike bairns ban apaa to -oNek sM[a, lkeNam ahep r•.oun.y bmcb of this AtntpseeL LuemBL shiU pay Oe fun wu of ewb �mLL IKeddnwnW a to dams he Men sock own da. Lk[mor N tee Mile a wee eruc6 to sad ntbb andtbk .a OL.S REV "IFS S 3/S Ib TERNI\AIIO\ a6lnreun ImSIrd!aakm LKuI, by d....w 14 LuN any L.rtlnd P.efnm S•ynr. Mrt!1 dnu0rr -1.1. L .. ..Sao Iar WI command Ion Alnt IN bay rtawe al LKrauta U+hrr Is lamely .nh ane al 14 r <m' W I' at"• mall. LKfeKI .1 dmn> all uplm n.bNr w u part re.q I-rm, rshdml panul (-pKI and moadrSnwnt al IW dnmurnsd or urmlMUd LKeaud ProVam., PmEm . Samq IMI bpee error wnvm 0101 --t N LKrmer,,", aDD1mu 1p m br enrmws• aby .644. L.emee may eltme a copy 1 -t.nmu purpo a anll) and LNO... W U Or'". m ........ L -raver 141 reeve nrp Wt Ors San as ehm INS IS cot -pplKabu Iuw lined, LK.mS,WU rnum all dwemenMlw4 .Wit and reused mannN ma• Smut INS dWaneawd w mmNm,d LKteud Prolnm or Pra Inmt 1- lKeewe IT WARRA \TY LKrmer Itumb, llulNn 14 a•sr oflW _ that d M w, kpl l.,b, IS [net w LcmKr . NuM lay the U" hnrMr�Maw01 4e SN nma wa IS Apum, rm, NS,, a < .arramKa lie a pu-I u Other •ammo apma S lmplKd, wU Wml. Set am bnww m, aey Impfud •ar.m. N mrrc Werablb r .ed INMU tar a had .1 .0r pvpeK It tI nIITATIO \OFLIARILITVOFLICE\IOR lv.Ke speralLt Lwnw%babdur l(rnrdr, far(IVmt blKt ar daeupn am, INS am I or .. 11 •Kh cot Uw N a LKraW Prolnm IoIM lbae (USNU IoIIM. ar damapa mehu[ from a bnua d ter •amen IN Smwn l / Wrcofl W tl "N eanrd - er-luo of t4 SWIM pmd by Lcrawe far a <-py W IM W nrnkl LKrbma b 0 sh, In Naad LlNOT ON ..bar at" tmr IWt lkmwr •dl eW W Wbk for any Idu 11-111, d LKSaaea S ter .. eWm S dreuld apma LKeeve Sy aM mM pant wNWm[ .11h -W kmMaon aey <klm w demaW .pleat Lctean MpIdNM.1 far.. enYn1 am d IW InaYCwna badly Ihn ASMmW . m1y be e1-e M i NIa -IMr N LK(nwe IN- W anwe hu anrwd. ,np 1Wr.o a,I6 far eespay nd may M r W s .ohm y nbrr pny mart roe eat 1-11 fur the Iaw Ind -M LKSnwr be Wbk fW IINVOL madmul br aanKbwmul dams "I alll,"1dale W IM On plmm ISh danupm rm rwD d I Keever MI and adarKd by W Palul4l of 11 am$- -I out dlatt(mmud.,bthe UK W t4 LKrmre PmSn In St. set ,M, nW MWbU ter.ny (Ulm, laaamw4m• Sa TAXEI D'unhmor) pmn art cuhnhe Or a a SCd,. *t, -w WMpatwul at SO, u art la. IN farm W NmudmlON hnalr bed, . shaman. an IN" w .. mu,... weal u, .moeM Ie Say ma Dlunbetel my Ee "Aand w Pay epee t4 drprly 01 lilt Wads, !t ASSIOhb1ECT Lkenue aM4 es In rnnkd IN Mu[n Ka ryhu Wrtvndn, ar any or IMm, nlheel IW poor .note meum el LKrmer TL CO \FLICT WITH STATUTE OR LAW If aey Not pmanwa, N rk, Ainumm art eukd lmIW by a eaan W eamPm.m ry Weaedrra M mple.bh 4alme alrWW 4yaWa to IWI Suµ 4deemrd amllue and" mmudn W tsn AErtamam toll mmuw w 4 tatercM. y ICTER III... ' PAROLE "dart CE lb- •Ifunl u Imeadrd by the pnua M a fml Mpmue. by thru aVrrecm a.d n lmrMed ahs S a s-mDM[ am MtlMn. auumeat al Me Iran. N t41r+["mm. ya 4OOIFICATI0\ Thil AErermrm n• N meddW ably by • .mnl vlsd by ., at W prtKt 9 APPLICABLE LAM• Thn Alurme.t ab Mhb of AUmNUCtt Um Drrfermasr pmeWS IbaU W temlMed w.Sewase rvh t4 U.I W tW C -awes. 4 W 5uln Of AmlrKy 1\ WIr%ESS WHEREOF. th parun Santa Wae SarcnW lbu AlrnmS... N t4 dew an forth brie. NE \CO SOFTWARE, IXC, or (Pnm \.eu) ITkk) DSc tEffmne dau — w In 1111 w bV I.a:eaaan ESRI Intatnational, InC Ilarnnbmar) S. J. C - .rata, Jr. (P. IS..) Dlrnetor of Svatem.:,ordination MIS) Dmc OL.7 REV sill ar CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA IlaMeuS IPml n.me_ —� (TNkI Dale I � 3/L I INDIRECT LICL\SE ACREE.\IL \T SCIICDL'LC \0.1 LICL\SED PPOGRAy1 PROGRAM iRICC INFO See Appendix A TRAI \I\G DAIS SC71[OLLE \O. E N,.alamvrtr Mad S.n.1 i.ml.r T,, BPI Software license price included In total contract price of Contract with ESRI dated Nay 7. 1986. SCTIEOL'LE NO.4 Tu E.e., O yes Tit 1 D N.mav CI No CamP..r — AIYmb. ar. Addn=. — Sum Tfkphw Dt 2 REV RIII s r SHIP TO ADDRLSS Z(R 7 TRAINIVG PRRZ DESIGNATED LOtIPNLYT TOTAL PRICE IPKI W I.0 dm pp �.eMf H,H l0 /YHIY b P,RMm 'am I- n.,.d .Inppat.p Mmh.[ IM.a.a •dl W .mrd Ie I!f m.xcl PATSILVT TERMS �-ey OEOGRAPNICAREA If- yH•,•f Ikud undwau.oa u..umpl LD A.maH m.n,.rnmw.T Uu.. p.Rnm, 4 3�/ Saw R.PRweW� 1 Page I of 5 SOMARE SUBLICENSE - TYPE IS ESRI 380 New York Street Redlands, California 92173 Software Marketing Agreement No. SWO30037 Nave and Address og Customers CITY OF RANCHO CULMIONGA Software License No.� P. 0 BOX 607 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 Updates to be sent to the attention of: Telephone: 714/989 -1851 The Customer, by Its OxecutL, n Purchase order, requests n eewa XChts document and its submission of its ('LSCeesed Sofware') on the e to we the software specif}ed in Block I equipment designated in Block II (' Designated Equipment'). The Cw comae agrees to pay applicable fees and charges for all Licensed Software and to comply with the 'Terns and Conditions of Lleemae.- ESRI, by its execution of this document grants to the customer identified above a license to we the Licensed Software on the Oesignaced Equipment in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of Licerse. BLOCK I - DESCRIP720N OF SOFTWARE FOR WHICH THIS LICENSE IS APPLICABLE Product / Optiom Serial No. 4010 COI /Options 03, 21 Description cs Iu -erac tive Graphics Library BLOCK II - DES101AIED EQUI"= FOR WHICH THIS LICENSE IS APPLICABLE MAKE /MODEL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CUSTOlffJI By: Authorized Signa turn Nam (Type or Print) Tlt1e Date Serial No. Location Customer's Address Above Accepted By: ESRI Authorized Signature S. J. Camarata Jr. Name My—P. or Printl Director Of Marketing and Systems Coordination Iltle to J -822 / r • ,i 2 of TERNS AND CONDITIONS OF LICENSE I. SCOPE OF LICENSE TO 'USE LICENSED SOIZVARE a. The license grant ad to Customer by ESRI is a nonexclusive, nontransferable license to use Licensed Software on Designated Equipment. b. The license Shall extend to thu temporary use of Licensed Software on equipment used as backup to Designated Equipment when Designated Equipment is 1¢operstive or is undergoing repair, malatonance or codification. c. Customer may at any time request that this license be extended to Permit use of Licensed Software om additional Designated Equipment subjoe� to ESRI approval by: (1) submitting a request that refers to this 3'Codes and that contains tte information specified in Block I2, and (11) paying the fees and charges applicable at the time the request 1s submitted for the additional use of Licensed Software or software updates. 2. COPIES A, Customer may make machina— readable copies of Licensed Software for safekeeping (archive) or backup purposes. In addition, Customer nay make work copies of Licensed Software, including copies merged with other Customer so�ff re, and a single archive copy for each such work=TV- copy, provided tha'YlEuatomar may have no more than five (S) such work copies for each Designated Equipment at any one time. Cue tome,. may replace any worn or damaged copy of Licensed Software, provided that Customer Immediately disposes of the replaced copy. No copies of Licensed Software may be made except for Customer's authorized use of Licensed Software. Customer shall maintain a record of the location Of all authorized copies and shall make such records available to ESRI upon request. b. Customer shall reproduce and Include on all copies of Licensed Software any copyright notice and any proprietary legend contained on the original Copy of Licensed Software. Customer shall affix to the Copy nedlun and to the container housing such medium a label specifying Designated Equipment and providing notice that Licensed Software is the property of ESRI or third parties from whom ESRI has obtained a licensing right, and Is covered by this license. The original and all copies In whole or in part, including copies merged with other software ace the property of ESRI or such third parties. ESRI shall not have title to Customer's software which Is Merged with Licensed Software. 7. PROTECTION ADD SECURITY OF LICENSED SOpT77ARE a. Customer shall hold Licensed Softwa:a In confidence for ESRI. Customer shall not disclose or permit disclosure of licensed i Software, including methods or concepts utilized eharain, to anyone who does not require access to Licensed Software for Customer's t authorized use. Customer's obligations with respect to protecting Licensed Software so set forth In this Paragraph 7a do not apply to any software that (1) ESRI has dedicated to the public, or (11) Customer has developed independently. b. Customer shall not provide or otherwise make available any copies of Licensed Software 10 any form, to or for the benefit of any person or entity except Customer, without the prior written permission of ESRI. Customer shall take appropriate action to Insure that any persons Permitted access to Licensed Software do not disclose or duplicate *it In contravention of the provisions of this sgreasant. Customer shall not remove or obscure any legend or notice contained to Licensed Software, or an any of its media, media containers or documentation. C. Before recycling, diacardieg or disposing of any media containing any Licensed Software, Customer shall erase or otherwise destroy Lltenaed 4. W, SIRRAHnare contained therein. A- ESRI warrants that any Licensed Software (inaluding Licensed Software embodied in Firmware), for which the software support is specified as Category A or Category B to the applicable software product description or data sheet, will conform to the description set forth Is such document. ESRI's sole obligation under this warranty will be to provide the support services described in the current software support policy associated with the specified support category. Such services are Intended to cake Licensed Software conform to its description. ESRI does not warrant that Licensed Software 1• free it— defects or that the support services will correct all defects which might exist. b. Licensed Software for which the software support is specified as 7 Category C, or f0i'Wich there is no sperifitatloa of s�fcvsre support to the applicable software produce dasertp[!on or data shw.„ is furnished without warranty of any kind, and without any representation regarding quality, perfortance or suitability. C. ESRI SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANT IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. S. INDEMNITY AGAINST INFRINGEMENT a. ESRI will defend Customer against A claim that Licensed So:tvare Infringes a V.S. patent or copyright when used within the scope of the license granted herein, and will pay the resulting costs, damages mad attorneys' fees finally awarded to any action arising out of such Claim, provided that: (1) Customer promptly notifies ESRI It weltimg of the claim, (il) ESRI has 8010 control of the defense of any actions and negotiations related to the settlement o! any e.a1a, and expel Customer cooperates fully in the defense of the claim at ESRI': expense. b. ESRI shall have no obligation t� defend Customer or to pay any costs, damages or attorneys' fees for any claim based upon (I) the use of any released version of Licensed Software other than the current, unaltered version releesnd by ESRI, or (ii) the combination, Operation at use of any Licensed Software with non -ESRI programs or data, or (iii) the use of Licensed Software on equipment other than Designated Equipment or In any operating environment ocher than the operating environment s, stilled in the applicable sofcvar description or data sheet e produce C. The foregoing states the entire obligation of ESRI with respect to Snfringment of patent& o- copyrights. 6. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY ESRI" LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES, IP ANY, WHETHER BASED UPON CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY IN TORT, WARRANTY, OR ANY OTHER BASIS, SHALHALL L NaOT NOT ERCEED BE LIA THE PEE PAID PT CUSTOMER FOR LICENSED SOFTWARE, ESRI SBLE FOR ANY LOST CONSEQUENTIAL PROFITS, INTERRUPTION OF SERVICE, OR DAMAGES OR, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN YARAGWS S ABOVE, FOR ANY CLAIMS AGAINST CUSTOMER BY ANY OTHER PARTY. rM 7. TERM AND TP3L4INATION OF LICENSE a• The license granted hereunder shall commence upon acceptance by ESRI and shall extend lndeflnitely until terminated either by Cuat^mar, or ESRI. b. Customer may terminate the license at soy time by giving ESRI thirty (30) dayr wIttta notice. C. ESRI may tions of the license if Customer fails to comply with Tens avd Conditions o[ LSeeuse and does not remedy the breach within sixty 160) days from the date of notice by ESRI to Cuatcmar of the breach. Th• teminatloa shall be effective Immediately upon receipt of notice following the expiration of the sixty (60) day period. d. 0100 cenioaciou of the license. Customer shall return to ESRL or destroy all Licensed Software, Including say copies made thereof, and shall furnish to ESRI a certificate of compliancu with this provision signed by an officer of Customer. R• CEb'rm PRO71SIONS a. This license will be governed by the lava of the state what% Designated Equl !s located as indicated in Rlock II. b. This license Imp assignable or transferable by Customer vltMut the prior written consent of LSRI. C. The tame of this license shall prevail over any printed terra or any of this tagrsem oe sap be modified ormwaivepurchase nl b oa eC �e cams agreement signed Ay authorized zapreseautivaa of the parties. d Any notice or request required or permitted by this license shell be deemed to ba given on the date mailed !f it is seat y ri mail addressed to Customer at its office noted o, the L tirsege patarcd age of this "cense or to ESRI. Attention, Software Manager, 380 New York Stteec. Redlands, California, 92773. Either pstty may change the address at which It desires to receive notices by mtlfying thn other in writing. ,3a/ VSER SUBLICENSE AGRELIENT This User Sublicense Agreement is made ani entered into between with its principal place of business ac ( "Licensee ") and ub sanese ac w t its principal place of ( "User "). WHEREAS, User is acquiring certain computer equipment and software from Licensee, and a portion of that software is subject to a License granted by P:imc Computer, Inc. ( "Prime "), the Licensee and User agree as follow%2 1. Licensed Sofh+ are ?f_ The Software provided in connection with this User Sublicense Agreement ( "Licensed Software ") is as follows: Description of Coovrioht Licensed So tware Product Number Owner 1.1 System Software 1.2 Application Software It is understood that Prime may not be the copyright owner ( "Owner') of all the Licensed Software but is either Owner or has the right to license the Licensed Software. The Licensed Software is to be used sololy on Prime Model No. System, as referenced on User Purchase Order No. 13 2. Seone of Auehor .zed Use The Licensed ,Oftware is furnished to User under a non- exclusive, prrsonal, non - transferable License for use solely w!-hi the United States, on a single central process „Ig ,.it specified in Section 1 (the "CPU ") and is restrict•! �� use only on the CPU. User shall not copy and sh ll %ot permit a third party to copy the Licensed Sol %wa a or any portion thereof, except that User shall bk pfrmittad to make a single copy solely for back -up o. archival purposes only for use on the CPU- User is prohibited from sublicensing or transferti,.g the Licensed Software In ary manner. 3. Title and Ownershio No title tow ownership of the Licensed Software or � any of its parts is hereby transferred to User. The Licensed Software, any copies made in whole or part of the Licensed Software, and all patent, copyright, trade secret and other intellac:ual or proprietary rights therein remain the valuable property of Owner. Confidentiality User agrees to take appropriate action by instruction or agreement with its employees who are permitted access to the Licensed Software to protect the conPid¢ntiality of the Licensed Software and keep it secure, and to ensure that no unauthorized ac.:eus, copy, or use is made of the Licensed Software. User agrees to notify Licensee and Prime immediately of circumstances surrounding any unauthorized knowled4e Possession, or use of the Licensed Software by any person or entity. 5. Warranty s Limi•ation of Liabil_ ity PRIME AND LICENSEE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THE LICENSED SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND i'ITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND FURTHER DISCLAIM ANY OBLIGATION OF LIABILITY ON THE PART OF PRIME OR THE LICENSEE FOR DAMAGES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED To, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF LICENSED SOFTWARE. 3a3 6. Termination 6.1 Tt..s aver Sublicense shall terminate at such time as User discontinues use of the Licensed Software, or upon sale, lease or transfer of the CPU. User shall notify Licensee in either such event. 6.2 Licensee may also terminate this User Sublicense if User fails to cure any breach of these license terms and conditions promptly after written notice from either Prime or Licensee. Prina may at its option require Liceisea to ensign its rights against User for a breach of the User Sublicense. 6.3 Upon`Aeinination of this User Sublicense, User shall at Licensee's election either return all copies and modificatione of the Licensed Software or destroy them. 6.4 The provision,; of Sections 4 and 5 shell survive any termination of thiu User Sublicense Agreement. USER ACXNOWLEDGES THAT IT HAS RLAD THIS AGREEMENT, UNDERSTANDS IT AND AGREES TO BE BOUND By ITS TERMS AND FURTHER AGREES THAT IT IS THE COMPLETE AND ZXCLUSIVE STATEMENT OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have ezecated this User Sublicense Agreement this 198. day of Licenses User By: By, Its, Its, R' CITli OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOR'P j DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Reber- Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Authorization and Approval to Publish and Mail the Notice of Bond Redemption for Sixt,: St-eet Industrial Park 182 -13 Assessment District to Bondholders. EVALUATION• The refunding of Asswt&aent District 82 -1 necessitates the early redemption of 1757 bonds in the amount of $6,785,000. Consequently, the City must publish and mail a Notice of Redemption to Bondholders sixty days prior to actual bond redemption date. Accordingly, approval is requested to publish and mail the Notice of Redemption to Bondholders. Approval to publish and mail the Notice of Redemption to Bondholders. Respectfully, e -17zo Ass nt City Manager JBP:kmm 13.;)Z- NOTICE OF REDEMPTION TO THE HOLDERS OF: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the •Agencyol has called for redemption on July 2, 1986, 56,785,000 principal amount of the Agency's 'City of Rancho t ^amonga Street Improvement Bonds, Assessment District Nn. 8a -1' (the amount er the Plusmaccruedr interest to thetdata of redemption. The Bo thereof, p The Bonds to be redeemed are numbered as follows 184 -229 Inclusive 251 -304 Inclusive 327 -388 Inclusive 411 -482 Inclusi•e 505 -587 Inclusive 610 -705 Inclusive 728 -837 Inclusive 86WBS Inclusive T3 1008 -1151 Inclusive 1173 -1337 inclusive 1359 -1545 Inclusive 1567 -1778 Inclusive On Jury t, 1986, the Bonds designated for redemption will become due and payable at the above - stated redemption price and payment will be made upon presentation and surrender at Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, Corporate Agency Service Center, Bond and Coupon Processing, 55 Hawthorne Street, 8th Floor, San Francisco, CA (if delivered) or P.O Box 37109, Sen Francisco, CA 94137 (if mailed) or at its r Los AgencyCDivision, 555 red)South Flower Street, 5th Floo All bearer Bonds must be surrendered with all interest coupons maturing subsequent to the redemption date. Interest payable July 2, 1986, will be paid in the usual manner on presentation of the coupon From and after July 2, 1986, interest shall cease to accrue on the Bonds called for redemption. All holders submitting their Bonds must also submit a form W -9 in order to avoid a 20% back -up withholding Interest and Dividend Tax Compliance Act of 1983. Failure to provide a completed w -9 will result in a 20% back -up withholding to bondholders. The form W -9 may be obtained from the Internal Revenue Service. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Dated: Aril 28 1986 3 =Dh CITY OF RA.*ICHO CUCA31ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwocd, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Access and Use of San Bernardino County's Assessor and Tax Collector's Computer Data Pile. EVALUATION: The Assessment Diaelct Management Section requires daily } information on status of delinquent assessments, prior period payments, corrected ta= bills, paid assessments, assessment receipts, and assessmen_ analysis per assessor parcel numbers. Direct access to the County's computer files will address all of the above items. Additionally, the City will be able to address 859 of its citizens' questions and problems without calling the County. Access to the County's :omputer Data File will contribute to n'more efficient and effective Assessment District Management Program, and it will provide data for our Geographic Mapping and Information System Data Base. The cost for this service is not material. However, there is a monthly service and rental charge of approximately $250 and an $.08 charge per transaction. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommenas Council approve Agreement for use of San Bernardino County's Assessor and Tax Collector Computer Data Respectfully, b� o Assislip° 'i ty Manager JBP :kmm 3 a 2 AGREEMENT FOR USE OF COMPUTER FILE DATA � ,• Y a -.. is a••- Y .1 I The /ic,r Coa.4i.— Depa!Oant of San Bernardino Count} authorizes the rele s/e1 or sh44red use of, the compuUr data described below to1�Q,_ec.,� /C� •1�: j(A ,..�;� far the purposes sta- ted below provided e f llowing conditions are ag d. and ensured. �.� I w 11 1. Assure data is �used,for•the, purposes stated. 2. Notify personnel having access to the data that'it is of a confidential nature. 3. Data Bade, available Wanly releasable to authorized personnel. 4. Security measures will be taken in the operation of terminal aquipaent,to preclude access to unauthorized personnel. S. All costa related to the acquJsitlon,;,uze pf..the Aata will be charged to' the, user of, the:data S` Data files to be release Mr accessfd: ,+ Data will be used for the�foil ng purposo(s): y St ey + >y�1bti`_ This agreement will continue is force until terminated by mutual agreement or 30 day written notice of either party. Roquestor Date gnature W \• Authorization For Use of OM Date YG Signature Interim Revised 5/80''' rli 1,Li j�� z, .(„"Attachment A Mi AGREEMENT FOR USE OF COMPUTER FILE DATA The r75SCSSI f p1 fDepartment at, San Bernardino County authorizes the release or Shared use .of the computerl data described below to,� %/ - Gl1 . t ' l r� far the purposes sta- ted below provided a fillowing,condittions are agrited and ensured. 1. Assure dat{ is.used.for the purposes stated. 2. Notify personnel having access to the data that 1t is of a confidential' nature. 3. Data made available is only'reteasable to authorized parscnnai. 4. Security emasures wilt be taken in the "operation, of terminal equipment to preclude access to.unauthorized personnel. S. All costs related to the acquisition and use of the data will be charged to the user, of the data. Data files to be releaz ortaccessed:� Data will be used for the following 'pu�se(s): Thfs agreement will continue in force until terminated by mutuallagreement or 30 day written notice of either party., Requestor Date Signature Authorization For Use of Data Dail Signature jr Interim Revised 6/80 .Attacheant A , ,- �'�.'afJ .�IJ �, 14 yN�•p�t • "rar!�� �.��'.�c_fa f'. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT jwl-U-13 DATE: May 7, 1906 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval of Amendment of Professioanl Service Agreement with Bank of America for Professional Services in Regards to Assessment Districts 82 -1R Sixth Street Industrial Park 84 -2 Alta Loma Channc 84 -1 CommunitV Facl llties District, ana 85 P.D. Park and Recreation. EVALUATION• Bank of America is the Paying Agent for Assessment Districts 82 -1R Sixth Street Industrial Park, 84 -2 Alta Loma Channel, 84 -1 Community Facilities District, and 85 P.D. Park and Recreation. Additionally, Bank of America provides Bond Registration, transfers,redemption and Administrative Services. RECOMMENDATION: The Professional Service Agreement Amendment will not have any negative impact on the Assessment Districts. Therefore, it is recommended that City Council approves Bank of America's Professional Service Agreement Amendment. Respectfully, Robert iZZo Assi ant City Manager JBF:kmm 330 til Vw* of Pinerica March 29, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. BOX 807 9320 BASELINE STREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 ,\TTN: HARRY EHPEY TREASURER Dear Hr. Empey: Mpi6� i0 Bank of America Corporate Trust is dedicated to providing you with the highest possible quality of paying agency service at the lowest possible cost. An integral part of our program is to constantly reassess our costa in relation to the sorvicae we provide. Declining earnings on balances held to pay bonds and couponc make it more costly -o maintain the quality that has made Bank of America one of the country's leading paying agents in an increasingly competitive environment. Consequently, we have revised our fee schedule effective July 1, 1966. Enclosed is the amendment to our paying agency agreement. Please return a signed copy of the agreement to my attention. if you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Peter Riwanuka {� Trust officer 228 -4146 Trust Number 79302 aw a anOWA mw-w inert W S&HW Aswcho - f {d •d%fJ l• This betweennthe CITY OF ..,RANCHO CUtCAMONGAn(^ISSUER")- and Dank of America National Trust and Savings Association ( "HARK"). Effective July 1, 1986, ISSUER shall pay to HANK fags, at the Same time as funds for maturities are payable, in accordance with the fallowing schedule: Annual Administration fee par issue 100.00 Payment and destruction of coupons (each coupon) Payment and destruction of bonds at .15 maturity or by call (each bond) 1.50 Registration, transfer, or exchange of bond& (each bond) aymen Pt of registered interest by check 5.00 (seep check) Payments by wire transfer (each wire) .50 20.00 Solicitation and filing of tax forms (each form) 1.50 Out of pocket expansest In addition to the xabbve Leas out -of- pocket expenses such u, T-u but not limited to, eeunsel fees, postage, insurance, stationary, co -agant fees (if any), costs of printing forma or lett t Publication of notices of redemption, expen ers, sea of Hank ers, el traveling to attend closings or meetings, ate, will be charged at the actual cost incurred. Dated CITY OF RANCHO CHCANONGA By — Title By — Title HANK OF Al CA HT i SA ey ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT n BY f Tit1i .TRUST OFFICER Trust Number 79302 ✓ - 33 c�- L. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 7, 1986 City Council and City Manager Robert Rizzo, Assistant C'ty Manager Jerry B. PelWood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Authorization and ADpl nv »1 to Publish and Mail the Notice of Boni Redemption for the Alta Loma Channel (84 -2) Assavament District to Bondholders. EVALUATION: The City of Rancho CUWonga has accumulated approximately twenty thousand dollars in prepaid assessments that are applicable to the Alta Loma Channel (84 -2) Assessment District. These funds are reserved for early redemption of bonds; presently, these bonds are costing the District 91 !n interest expenses. Consequently, the City must publish and mail a Notice of Redemption to Bondholders sixty days prior to the actual bond redemption date. Accordingly, approval is requested to publish and mail the Notice of Redemption to the bond holders. RECOMMENDATION: Approval to publish and mail the Notice of Redemption to Bondholders. Respectfully. /a c obert zo Assist t City Manager JBP:kmm 333 0 1 , :e-a.' ri TO THE HOLDERS Opt CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMWOA ALMA LONA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84 -2 NOTICE IS RLRLBY GIVEN that the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "Agency ") hu called for redemPtiem en July 2, 1986, 115 Oka Cb Principal amount of the Ageacy'a "City of Rancho Cucamaga Alta .nna Chaenel IO ?vice Of lcnd s. of the priani pDistrict thereof, plus It t tooda he daaOferedampt'0o. The load* to be twdeeced are a folla"at (BOND CERTIFICATE ROS.) 80,31,105 on July 2, 1986. the Hoada, or portion thereof, designated for redempti00 will be bacon,, due no yab aadsausnndstsatdEank o(cAmarieaoseatiooalmsTrust11� d and male upon presentation Corporate Ageaty Service Center, load and Coupon Savings Aaaoclatiou, T�� f Sao Ftaociaco, CA (if delivered) or processing. 37 SS 9i1yvhaclsvck894137o(if mailed) or at its Corporate cgency P.O. Box 57109, `Tin Division, 555 South Ftwar Street, Stb Floor, Los Angeles, 1986, will be paid in the usual manatr of Interest payable 1117 21 Presentation. From and after July 2, 1966. interest shall coon [o +eczua oa cha Hoods called for redemption. bit I form Ali holders ii ttheir BL Bon" Met c"sla*ava 9 st and DividendI= Co plia to avoid , s back-UP w o m Ol Act Of 1983. Co bondholders. provide. a0rcompleted U-9 may be obtained f roa the Interval thholdi ` Revenue Service' CITY OF gAMC80 GOCANON ^A. CALIFORNIA Dated: hM it 28. 1986. 3311 The San Bernardino County Transportation Commission SAN BE COUNCIL ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS A PLANNING COUNCIL OF COOPERATING INTERACTIVE GOVERNMENTS Weals Fargo Building, 334 W Third Street, Sulta 401 San Bo.nardlno. Caliromla 92401 (714) 8848270 April . 1986 Me. Beverly Autheld City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, SC Rancho Cucamonga, Calitornia 91730 Deer Ms. Autheld: San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANSAG), in a Joint effort with the Riverside County Transportation Commission, recently co- funded a consultant stud�yy ,� to determine the feasibility of implementing a freeway emert6ncy call box system In Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. The consultant report showed that utilizing revenue through the implementation of SB 1199, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties could generate sufficient revenue to Jointly fund and operate an 800 to 900 freeway call box system The SE 1199 legislation enables a county SAFE (Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies) to impose a fee of up to one dollar per registered motor vehicle per year to finance, build and operate a freeway call box system within its boundaries. The SAFE system itself will be directed by a governing board composed of two mashers of the Board of Supervisors and seven city elected representatives; a subset of the SANBAG Board is contemplated. The consultant report was reviewed by the SAMOA(; Board at the April 2, 1986 board meetiai. The SANBAC Board approved the report and requested SANBAC staff to initiate the implementation Process for establishing a SAfE program in San Bernardino County. The initial step is to obtain the approval, by Resolution, of the County Board of Supervisors and a majority of the cities (having a majority of the population of the incorporated cities). To facilitate your agency's consideration of the establishment of a SAFE, SANBAC staff have enclosed excerpts from the SAFE consultant study These include the Executive Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations, a copy of SB 1199, draft resolutions, and population estimates for Riverside and San Bernardino County cities. Should you need additional information, SANBAC has available a few complete copies of the consultant report. You say also call Mr. Men McDaniel, Executive Director, or myself, Mr. Kerry Forsythe, at the SANBAC office at (714) 884 -8276 should you have any questions. Your SANBAC CIAO OP. ADaANTO, StWOW. aq RM W Z CWNa COLTON, FOMANA aRM10 TUMAM W" UNOA MOMpNn NR'=OMAFM MNOq OVCAMMIC& IaDLMM NAup,rgv*Aa O 0. Y1CTOAW1, OOIMTY OF aW ernNAnOaq ■ We would urge your agaucy to adopt the enabling Resolution for the development of a SAFE program in our county. It is important that this action be in a timely meaner. Collections of tho added one dollar on vehicle registration cannot start until the SAPS is approved and formalised. Early npproval will allow collections to begin sooner, and the fund to grow while details and final approvals on the location and operation of equipment are worked out between the SAPS, Caltrans, and the California Highway Patrol. Other counties are currently considering - mplementing a SAFE program. We would like to move our program ahead and complete negotiations with Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol as soon as possible to avoid any hold up in processing due to a rush of SAPS applications from other counties. Riverside is al-eady underway gathering Resolutions, aiming at our Joint program. Please place this Resolution before your City Council and transmit adopted copies to us. Sincerely, "- " "1 " Herr orsythe delis ant Director cc: City Managers SANSAO Board Members Deborah Barmack CL -86 -161 ,).� b Report to the Riverside County Transportation Commission and the San Bernardino Associated Governments on a 337 QOCL AMEMSER OF ARTHUR YOUNG IN TERNATIONAL `..L "dzurr Ybumg sue. or 02:0 vl.. G,:&, E n.a' P O. EO 2410 COCA Cll& C&*C 'L MIS T.w4hMr 1714! 830.E-500 March 12, 1986 Mr. Harry Beck Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission 4075 Main Street, Room 302 Riverside, California 92501 Mr. Wesley McDaniel Executive Director 11-V San 3ernardino Associated Governments Suite 401, Wells Fargo Building 334 W. Third Street San Bernardino, California 92401 Dear Messrs. Beck and )fcDaniels We are pleased to present our final report on the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE). The report describes San Bernardino and Riverside Counties' feasibility of developing a SAFE. The study det6rmired that the Counties can afford to implement emergency reeway call boxes. The revenues provided by SB !199 appear sufficient to finance a system of approximately 800 call boxes. The Counties are able to develop SAFES indEpendently or jointly; however, the economics are pers•;asive the a joint operation. We have enjoyed working with you on this project. If we mar be of further assistance, please Contact me at (714) 850 -9500. Very truly yours, Larry H. Seigel of Arthur Young a Company 3,39 March 12, 1986 MCECOTIVE SQP.MARi A. What does SB 1199 enable counties to tccompliah? SB 1199 enables a lecrl county SAFE tc receive up to $1 per registered motor zUy,�hicle each year to finance, build and. operate a freeway.call -box system. B. What are the major legislative /operational requirements and constraints? ._ 1. Legislative Requirements a. The SAFE must be authorized by a County and the majority of the cities representing a majority of the population in the County. b. The SAFE authority shall consist of seven members: • Two members selected by the Board of Super - viso-s • rive members jointly selected by the affected cities. C. The SAFE plan must be reviewed and approved by the California Highway Patrol (CHP) and caltrans. 2. operational Requirements /Constraints a. Revenue is limited to the $1 per vehicle registra- tion each year. b. State agencies ma prescribe call -box intecvals that way be financially infeasible (i.e., 1/4 mile rather than 1/2 or one mile spacing). 339 d C. The CHP will provide all dispatch services of the SAFE system. All CF.? costs will be reimbursed by the SAPS. d. Imolementation may be delayed to enable the CEP ttr develop the required dispatch capability. C. How might the proposed system be configured? The Los Angeles County system has boxes at 1/4 mile inter- vals. Financially and operationally, other counties appear to savor at least 1/2 mile spacing in heavily traveled areas. At 1/2 mile, the motorist is never further than 1/6 mile ahead or behind of a call -box. It is feasible to have differentiated spacing based upon the traffic density. A call box system with 1/2 mile spacing would provide coverage primarily within the metropolitan areas, considering the available funding provided by SO 1199. Alternatively, it is possible to cover all major highways in both Counties more regularly by increasing the spacing of the call boxes based on the traffic density. The boxes will communicate with a CHP dispatch center which will call for road service, emergency help, or relay a message to a third party for assistance. D. What is the approx5mate range of costs for a system? Costs depend on the technu.ogy used and the spacing of the call - boxes. Annual costs are comprised bf operating/ maintenance expenses and debt service payments for the capital investment. Preliminary annual coat estimates are: Intensive Service For Heavily Widespread Service Traveled Areas (658 boxea) + _ (BTes) ___a Ooe[at nq s) to __,_ nq Cam to $377,000 $657,000 $596,000 $507,000 *The estimates assume use of existing microwave atat7ons for the radio units. E. What are the relevant technologies? Two technologies appear most likely to meet Riverside and San Bernardino Counties' need:%. These technologies and major advantages /disadvantages are summarized in the following tables - 2 - Technology Description Advantages Disadvantages Cellular Radio signals • Easily moved • Theft transmitted to target and from hard- . Produces wire phones reports on • Cell covAr- system status age and use • Modern tech- • Early in nology development . Transmit road census data to computer . Self checking . Vandal resis- tant • Call forward- ing � ass- - ,al.;:- ant Conventional Radio signals sent • Featly moved No auto - Radio to and from dis- matic patch center • Weather toler- reporting ant • Produces reports on system status and use Vandal resistant F. What types of financing alternatives are available7 Operating and maintenance costs are normally aid as expenses are incurred during the year. The major capital investment required to build and equip the system can be financed over a period of years to •smooth• the cash outflow over the expected life of the system. We have identified three basic alternative approaches to financing the capital costs of the systems • Revenue bonds or similar instruments could be issued to pay for the equipment and its instal- lation with a portion of annual registration fees pledged to debt service. - 3 - 341/ • A leasing company could purchase and install the equipment and lease the system to the SAFE. Tax benefits under this approach might reduce costs below the.first option. • Under a privatization arrangement a private firm could install, own and maintain the call boxes and sell the system's services to tie SAFE under a service contract. Additional tax benefits might be available under this arrangement, further reducing overall costs. G. .that are the major maintenance and operating concerns? Although the cost and degree of maintenance varies with the selected technology, maintenance does not appear to be a major cdncern. The major operating concerns includes • The cost and lead time for developing the CEP dispatch capability. • Balancing State agency guidelines, motorist con- venience and the available funding. • Developin°¢�h reliable and effective capability to t c im ltaa:: `ic- $ ••� ••r oparatl..a and avniiv- ing of the SAFE system. Another issue raised by some jurisdictions is liability. This has not been a major consideration in Los Angeles' exper- ience, and all aspects of liability have not been fully explored. The SAFE agency should consult legal counsel about this matter. B. Wha%. guidance would be useful to the Counties regarding SB 1199? The attached report provides SMMAG, ROTC and other juris- dictions with substantial information about establishing a SAFE system. The most important guidance we found in our study vas: • Develop a specific and thorough implementation plan. • Conduct a thorough and competent analysis and procurement of the various technologies. • Act as quickly as possible to begin the SAFE process. This is important for beginning the revenue collection process and receiving early CRP /Caltrans approval. 4 _ $ • I What role may be appropriate for SANBAG and the RCTC7 The seven voting SANBAG Hoard coul effective, econon administrative ant Riverside can joir Counties. SANBAG the SAFE. Operat . eration of one jc each County. Thi project and reiml services provided. abers of ROTC and a subcommittee of t.,^•� serve as SAFES. Tney would provide an ml and tine- saving approach for SAFE anagement se:v:ces. San Bernardino and y form one SAFE having authority in both d RCTC can form a subcommittee to act as I and staffing economies warrant consid- t SAFE system instead of a syatem for SAFE system could 2e established as a sad on the basis of expenditures and S - 3 y,3 a E7.HIBIT I -2 Page 1 of 2 SAN BERNARDINO AND RiwRsiDE COUNTY HIGHWAYS USED FOR REPORT INFORMATION San Bernardino County Riverside Count ghvaY Number H q va —i —h y Numb 2 10 10 15 15 60 18 62 30 71 38 74 40 78 58 79 60 86 62 91 71 95 95 111 127 177 138 195 178 215 215 243 267 371 330 395 i J V .L Page 2 c a 1 •' J �I •t ( � i' 1— i 1 I , 1 �, 1 i, .t• �1, r ` 4 • �. Y' It � y ' •` J �'�' r• k � � �!. 1 yr I 1 (':t •."Ji ,';'�. w% d O f, Cl O O CD U_ O V** _ { O O O n C5 0 y N O O O O O To illustrate one financial scenario -- if Shn Bernardino and Riverside Counties implement a call box sysrr+ with 860 _ telephones as shown in Exhibit III -9, the financial : Lion is estimated as follows: Number of units (124 Cellular and 736 .adic) 860 Revenue $1,235,000 Annual Expenditures: Capital Repayment (81 amortization for 10 years) 657,000 Operating /maintenance costs 377,000 Total costs 51,0341000 Amount available for administration and contingencies S 201.000 As sho.m above, wiWa hypothetical widespread 860 call 7si- bua system, San nernardino ana kiverside counties would have approximately $200,000 available for administrative and contin- gency expenses. These revenue and cost estimates assume the following three points: • $1.2 million revenue in the first full operating year. • Increases in operating costs being covered by growth in vehicle registrations. • A midpoint estimate for each of the two technol- ogies. Exhibit IV -1 is a preliminary estimate for the two Counties. It is based upon the illustrative 860 widespread call box system (from Exhibit III -91 -eing phased in beginning July 1987. It shown that it is poss.- �r the Counties to establish a "sinking" fund which can be used in the future. By July 1987 the SAFES might obtain almost $900,000 to use as a "sinking" fund. 4' Iv -5 • - 3 5/b i r ' CONCLUSIONS AND RECONHENDATIONS There appears to be a high level of interest in implementing emergency call box systems in both Counties and throughout California. Los Angeles County officials, the CEP and Los Angeles County's residents appear to regard the call -boxes as a valuable service for public Lufety and convenience. The boxes Are heavily used and receive high pudic appreciation. San Bernardino and Riverside Counties appear to be able to finance a system with approximately 800 to 900 -all boxes. A configuration with a greater number of call boxes may not financia:ly viable, depending on the' -`.-c....... - -3 Payments to CRP for dispatching are uncertain and may substantially reduce the funds available to build and operate the SAFE system. OHV costs are not yet decided. Caltrana costs and potential subsidies are uncer- tain and need further exploration. SANBAG's and RCTC's existing governance structure and staff capabilities may provide effective and timely means of conducting the SAFE authority operations. A SAFE emergency call -box system appears to be achievable and beneficial for San Bernardino ind Riverside Counties. Rapid decision - making, planning and implementation actions by both counties could position the Counties ahead of other applications for SAFE approval and processing by state agencies. H. RECONHENDATIONS Exhibit V -1 on the following page presents steps we have identified as necessary to move ahead with a SAFE system. These steps include: 1. Establishing a SAFE authority by obtaining Counties and cities approval. SANBAG and ROTC would be excellent bodies to comprise the SAFE authority. 2. Notifying DNV tea: the SAFE authority is estab- lished and therefore the :avenue collection process should begin. 9. Further investigating (including demonstrations and /or site visits) the available cell -box tech- nologies. 4. Preparing a more specific financing and cash flow- plan. S. Conduct a study to determine more precisely tbs availability of radio frequencies, cellular coverage, and the number and location of base -- stations and other equipment. 6. Developing a better undorstanding of DNV, CHp and Caltrans requirements, fear and possible conces- sions. Negotiations should be started as soon as possible to secure the best possible arrangements for both counties. 7. Finalizing a detailed SAFE implementation plan and schedule. S. Developing a request for bids and selecting an appropriate technology. 9. Developing an effective public information program. 10.E Obtaining an opinion from legal counsel regarding the management of potential liability. If State agencies require additional call - boxes, the Counties bave severa: alternativest V -2 0 �i _ a� = i 3 s i n �. 3 s a �I xl "' t SI • ,, L ; � o al • d • S ' i i ;� � � s � � 3 �` 3 � s � a� .� e =_g� � ' �l =g� � J' � � � =�' � a3_' � a � � 8 � 3 3� '� � a a b 1° �� � �� � � a,. b � Y' t �i � �� be . . . . Ufa . . . . . . . a t3 . . ;� . t! . 3 . . 1. Attempt to stretch out the financing plan to accom- modate the increased cost (longer term financing, phased implementation, deferred capital payments, etc.). 2. Attempt to negotiate less demanding terms from the State. 3. Meet with Legislators to request provisions for raising additional revenue. lipe V -3 3 sa :-S' APPENDICES APPENDIX A Page 1 of 3 Senate Hill No. 1149 CHAPTER 1350 An act to add Section 171.1 to. -nd to add Chapter 14 (eammor'ng with SaKjon 2330) to Division 3 cf. the Street and Highways Coda, and to add Sections MMS and 9230.10 to the Vehicle Coda relating to straats and bighwayL James br Ce.emar Sgtemsbar 1% liar Piled with smicu? of State Oetebw 1, list) LSCISUTWE COUNSEL'S DICESr Sill 1199, Cmvea. Service authority for freeway emergendes motor vehicle registration feez: LTtxwe. (1) Under existingh•.v, the Department hi ofTrsnryort tian m full poaenion and matrol of allrtate highways b the CzlVrnla Freeway and E�rescway System. Thais u would authorize the heard of supervisors of a county and a majority of Ow4ges witbla the county having a majority of the Tsa population to a llih a service authority for freeway emerg=cias ' w++uVUa. iu, tauvwcew autcanry wtsutri are aatJWraea to Impose additional fees, not to exceed Sl par yeas, on velwas :egirtcred within the county, as p:cscribad. (2) Under existing taw.rea*zation Imam motor vehiclesmay be used for, amce other things, street and highway pavposcs This b01 would require the payment of an additonal registration fee ,mposed by an authority for motor vehicles In subject catmtic, exce t those exempted under law, and would require thou fees to ae distributed to the approprisle authority after deduction of administrative costs by the Department of Motor Vehiclez. The bill would authorize an authority tome the fees for the oplementation of an emergency motorist aid "am, as specified, am pordoess cf the California Freeway and Expreaswiy System in the county. The bill would authorize an authority to Issue to%enue bonds for the purposes of the bill and to pledge fen es revenues, as specified The bill would auihmixe the Department of Tramspnrution and require the The People of the Sub of Cafiform& do enact as foflewr SECTION 1. Section 13L1 is added to the Streets and Highways Code, to read: 131.L Upon the request of any Service Authority for Freeway x a 3sa :; Pae: a o: a Ch. 13M _a_ Emergencies that has imposed additional fees on Vehicles pursuant to Section 9750.10 of the Vehicle Code, the department may contract with the authority for the Installation, operation, and maintenance of emergency call boxes on portions of the CAUGMia Freeway and Expressway bursthe department em within the county. The se.-vece authority shall SEG 2. Chapt 1 commen with Section=) is this Section. to Divfdon 3 of the Streets and athways Code, to reads Cturru It StttvttS AVrft0A= yon FRELwtY Exziu:v ras 2330. A Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies may be establhhed In any county E the board of Supervisors of the county and a majority of the cities within the county having a majority of the populasioo adopt resolutions providing for the establishment of the authority. 5331. An tutbority established under this section shall have 7 member; with I members selected by the board of supervisors and 3 membenveleeted jointly by the affected cities. =y- 2532 authority may contract and may undertake env act convenient or necessary to carry out this chapter and any other law relating to the authority. 2= Ariy authority established under this chaptermaytmposea fee, not to exceed one dollar (31) per yew, on vehicles registered in the county pursuant to Section 9550.10 of the Vehicle Code. 2MC The moneys received by each authority VXA=t to mbdividon (b) of secttcn 9150.10 of the t chicle Code shall be used for the Implamentationk malrstenance and operatics of an emergency motorist aid system, including, but not limited to, emergency, call boxes and emergency mechanical service patrols on the portions of the California Freeway and Expressway System located within the county in which the authority is established. Tho Department of Transportation and the Department of the Californiaa Highway Patrol shall each review and approve plans for implemantatfon of an emergency motorist aid system proposed for any state highway route and Shell be reimbursed by the setmea authcrity for AD costs Incuned. An authority may construct and maintain the facilities of an emergency motorist aid system or It may contract with a private Person or entity to do so. 2533. Any sarvlce authority may, pursuant to Chapter 0 (commevtlng with Section WW) of Division 2 .'Tttla 3 or the Cavcrnment Code, Issue ravenue bonds for the purposes of this chappter and pledge revenues to be received from the fen SEG 0. Section 2WS is added to the Vehicle Code, to read: 24715. When any Service Authority for Fteeway Emergencies h Streets and �pose additional on vehicles pursuant to Section 2153 of gh ys Code, the department shall enssvcr cans ea ee 313 -0— Ch. law and provide cgntril dispatching tenices for the systen on the Portions of the Callforoia Freeway and F=resssvay System within, the county. The department shall detersnitte and authorize the seMn providers eligible to participate In the system. The service authority shall reimburse the deperms utforall emtrincurm'undw this section. SEG 4. Section 9730.10 b added to the Vehicle Code, to read: 9730.10. (a) In addition to any other fees sp.c(Hed in this Code and the Revenue and Taxadin Code, any additional fen imposedby X Service Authority for Freeway Fmugemcies pursuant to Section 8553 of the Streeu and Highways Code shall be paid to the department at the time of tegistration er renewal of registration of every vehicle subject to registration under this code in the subject tGuntim except those vehicles that re expressly exempted uadar this code from the payment of registration Fees. (b) After deducting its rdna lnittrative"stu the department then distribute the additional fees muened perms of to mbdivtrion (a) to the authority in the County In which they were oolleated. lie ass II so 0- APPENDIX a Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION REGOIRED) TO ESTABLISH SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGFXCIES ON THE NOTION of ,seconded by adopted: t e o s ow nq reolution is WHEREAS, Chapter 14 of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code was added by Chapter of the Statutes of 1985 providing for the establishment OT-8 Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE) if the Board of Supervisors of the county and a majority of the cities within the county having a majority of the population adopt resolutions providing for the establishment of the authority; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that a freeway emergency motor at a system is needed to protect the safety of motorists on freeways; and WHEREAS, the T_v Lind: that a freeway emergency motor sc a systen is needed `to reduce the time spent by law enforcement officers responding to routine vehicle disablements; and WHEREAS, SAFE will have responsibility for implementing a freeway emergency motorist aid system in the San Bernardino/ Riverside County region; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED, That the City Council of the City of hereby requests that a Service Authority for Freeway Energencies be established is San Bernardino/Riverside County pursuant to Section 2SSO of the Streets and Highways Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the directs that the members of the • San Bernardino Assoc ace Govetnments/Riverside County Transportation Commission shall serve as the Ser "ice Authority for Freeway Emergencies in the County of San Bernardino/Riverside. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of State of California, cn this day of T986, by the following vote: AYESs NOES$ ASSENT: ass APPEND:;% B Page 2 of 2 (DRAFT) RESOLUTIQN REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY ENERGENCIEB ON THE NOTION of , seconded by adopted: t a following resolution is 17HEREAS, Chapter 14 of Divis.cn 7 of the Streets and Highways Code vas added by Chapter of the Statutes of 1985 providing for the establishment OF —& Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE) if the Board of Supervisors of the county and a majority of the cities within the county having a majority of the population adopt resolutions providing for the establishment of the authority; and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino /Riverside County Board of Supervisors finds that a freeway emergency emergenry motorist aid system is needed to proteFt, the safety of motorists or. freewaya; _ and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino /Riverside County Hoard of Supervisors finds that a freeway emergency motorist aid system is needed to reduce the time spent by law enforcement officers responding to routine vehicle disablements; and WHEREAS, SAFE will have responsibility for implementing a freeway emergency motorist aid system in the San Bernardino/ Riverside County region; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that the San Bernardino /Riverside County Board of Supervisors hereby requests thdt a Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies be established in San Bernardino /Riverside County pursuant to Section 2550 of the Streets and Highways Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the San Bernardiro/niverside County Board of Supervisors directs that the membeis of the San Bernardino Associated Governments and Riverside County Trans- portation Commission shall serve as the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies in the County of San Bernardino /Riverside. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors, County of San Bernardino /Riverside, State of California, on this day of , 1986, by the following voter AYES: NOES ABSENTt 3-s-6 APPENDIX C CITY POPULATIONS FOR RIVERSIDE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES (1985 estimate) Riverside Count Banning 16,000 Lake Elsinore 9,000 Beaumont 81000 Marino Valley 55,000 Blyth 8,000 Norco 22,000 Cathedral City 16,000 Palm Desert 15,000 Coachella 13,000 Palm Springs 39,000 Corona 43,000 Perris 9,000 Desert Hot Springs 81000 Rancho Mirage 81000 Hemet 28,000 Riverside 183,000 Indian Wells 2,000 San Jacinto 10,000 Indio 28,000 La Quint& 6,000 Total Incorporated Population X26,000 Unincorporated 323,500 San Bernardino County Adelanto 4,000 Montclair 25,000 Barstow 20,000 Needles 4,01S Big Bear Lake 6,000 Ontario 108,000 Chino 48,000 Rancho Cucamonga 65,000 Colton 25,000 Redlands 501000 Fontana 49,000 Rialto 47,000 Grand Terrace 10,000 San Bernardino 435,000 Loca Linda 11,000 U land 54,000 Vpctorville 20,000 Total Incorporated 'Population 681,000 Unincorporated 373,000 3,57 RESOLUTION NO. V (p — 15& •- A Rt1OLOTICS OF TR CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO COCANQCA. CALIFORNIA, ISTABLISS310 SERVICE WTHORITY FOR R=AY ancuCIrs WSREAS, Chapter 11 of Division 9 of the Streets and Higbvayn Code ran added by Chapter _ of the Statutes of 1983 providing for the establishment of a Service Authority for Frewsy, Emergencies (SAFE) if the Board of Supervisors of the county and a majority of the cities rltbin the county bevies a majority of the population adopt resolutions providing for the establinbrat of the authority; and WRlEAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds that a frowsy emergency motorist aid system is needed to protect the safety of motorists an frowsy&, and WHRRAS, the BauchoCaeawag& City Council finds that a frowsy emergency motorist add system*, needed to reduce the time spent by Imo �47- enforcement officers respoodlog to routine vehicle disablements; and WNERFAS. SAFE rill bovo reeponsil.ldty for implementing a fraway emergency motorist add system in the Sea Sernardino /Riverside County tvgion. NOW THEREFOR. IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that the City council of the City of Reecho Cucamonga hereby requests that a Service Authority for Frowsy Emargencies be established in San Sarnard'.no /Riverside County pursuant to Section 2550 of the Streets and Sigbvays Code. BB IT FURTHER RESOLVED. that the Reecho Cucamonga City Council directs that the members of the San Bernardino Associated Jovernaests /Mveraide County Transportation Commission shall serve as the Se"Les Authority for Frawsy Pamrgencies in the County of Ban Bernardino / Rivervids. PASSED. APFROym, and ADOFTID this a day of e. 19e. AYES. NOM ABSENT. Jeffrey ling, Mayor Z�52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7. 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Laura Psomas, Landscape Designer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF INTENTION TO FORM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 FOR THE CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED BETWEEN THE EXTENSION CF BANYAN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH AND BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF ROCHESTER AND MILLIKEN AVENUES ON THE EAST AND WEST BEING DEVELOPED BY THE MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND KAUFMAN AND BROAD DEVELOPMENT GROUP AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 4, 1986 Tv- Attached are the Resolut ons and Engineer's Report for the formation of a street lighting maintenance district for Phase One of the Caryn Planned Community, located at the northeast corner oi' Highland and Milliken Avenues. Phase One consists of Tract Nos. 12642, 12935, 12937, 12940, 12941, and 12942. Future tracts will be annexed to the district at'the time of recordation of each tract. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached 1eso u ons vitiating and forming Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5, give preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report and set the date of public hearing for June 4. 1986. Re ly s t , LBH:LP ://�c%/R- Attachaants .3159 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIWINGtI14AIYTENANCE REPORT DISTRICT NUnER 5 CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY SECTION 1. AUTHORIAUTHORI -EPORT This report is Prepared In compllance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15, Of the Street and Highways Code, of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. GEREPALION This report deals with the establishment of a Street Lighting Maintenance District for the Caryn Planned Commaity. The District will eventually Include the majority of the area Included with the Plan..gd COMunfty, ar approved by Ordinance Mo.`X -A, Areas to he included in the work program are the street lights within the rights-of -way or designated easements Of streets dedicated to the City and are limited to local, collector and secondary arterial street;, including Vintage Drive. The work program excludes maintenance of street lights in rights -of -way of major arterial highways (Banyan Avenue, Rochester Avenue, and Milliken Avenue). These arias will be included In the City -wide lighting district for arterial highways, SECTION 3. SCOPE The specific areas to be maintained by the District as defined in the preceding section, will become part of the active work program at such time as the specific areas are annered Into the District. The norms) process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, construction of the $treat lighting system, and, upon demonstration of satisfactory operation, the acceptance by the District no later than the fol)ow•n9 July. The Developer will make a sufficient deposit with the Southern California Edison Company to provide for up to twelve (12) months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and -1- 36v servicing costs of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. Upon establishment of assessment effective July 1 of each year, any remaining deposit shall be refunded to the developer. Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District, consists of maintenance, operation and servicing of street lights. Annual Engineer's Reports will be prepared and approved by the City Council deft..ing the specific work program for eau. year and its estimated cost. The plans and specifications for all street lighting will be prepared by the developers for the subdivision improvements and will be approved by the City Engineering Division. Detailed maintenance activities on the Street Lighting Maintenance District include: the furnis.ling of- jfvices and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any street light Improvement and the repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any, improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS As development proceeds within the Caryn Planned Community. the area to be maintained by the District will increase and so will the cost; however, the number of dwelling units will also Increase. it is anticipated that the number of dwelling units will increase at approximately the same rate as the maintenance area will increase, thereby keeping relatively constant the cost per dwelling unit, excluding cost of living increases. Based on historical data adjusted for inflation, it is estimated that the quantity of street lights and the maintenance and energy costs for assessment purposes will be as follows: -Q. 3(401 i e A. Phase One Construction The estimated cost (at current dollars) for the District as initially formed comprising the 227 dwelling units of Tract Nos. 12642, 12935, 12937, 12940, 12941, and 12942: Lamp Quantity' Rate" Month /Year 81 ea. 5800 Lumen x $8.90 x 12 • 8,650.80 total annual maintenance cost Complete District The estimated cost (at current dollars) for the District upon completion of all areas within the entire Ctryn Planned Community is: Lamp Quanta Rate" Month /Year 370 ea. 5800 Lumen x '1�1' $8.90 x 12 • 39,516 Yy ' Assumed to be high pressure sodium vapor, 5800 lumen or 9500 linen; actual type and size may vary. " All night energy service per lamp per =nth including maintenance costs. All the costs are bated on Southern California Edison Company monthly rates including maintenance. All costs and areas are based on current estimates and L i may or may not be valid for future years. The total cost and unit cost vary m as the monthly rate varies and as additional areas for maintenance are annexed to the District. The monthly rate is established by the Southern California F: Edison Company and is not currently controlled by the size of an area or any ° operation of the developer. The size of the areas being annexed to the District only has an influence on the total cast. The casts shown are estimates only, and the actual easement will be based on Actual cost data. 'u SECTION 5 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed - sessment Diagram for the tracts that will comprise the Maintenance District originally is attached to this report and labeled -3- 34--�' 'Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5•. This diagram 1s hereby Incorporated within the text of this report. The District will originally comprise Tract Nos. 12642, 12935, 12937, 12940, 12941, and 12942 of Phase One of Caryn Planned Community as each tract is recorded and annexed into the District at the time of recordation. Additional tracts will be annexed Into the District upon Individual tract recordation. SECTION 6. ASSESSMENTS Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of specific benefit to all developed residential property within the District in accordance with the following relationship: T Land Use 151f Assessment Units as Single family residential dwelling units 1 unit Estimated Annual Assessments Estimated Phase One: Total annual cost (Section 4) $8,650.80 Assessment units Singlo family 221 d.u. x 1 unit • 227 assessment units Estimated assessment rate • $8650.80 I= • $38.10 per year Thus, estimated assessments of 38.10 per single family dwelling unit will initially be required for the original District. Estimated Planned Community complete: Total annual cost (Section 4) Assessment units Single family - 940 d.u. x I unit • 940 assessment units Estimated assessment rate + $39 516 9�6— • $42.04 per year -4- 3L-:? S Thus. estimated annlual assessments of 542.04 per single favily dwelling unit is projected to tie required at project completion. Estimated assessments are for comparison only. Actual assessments will be set by public hearing each year in June and will be based on actual energy and maintenance expenses and developed land use summaries. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. I FUTURE FOO'MILL FRFMAY �— .•.rwrww ,nest _ � _ _� (CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONCA `t43 - � � I ENGINEERING DIVISION nn '• - VICINITY M,1p I page ?.A EXHIBIT 08• Tract No. 12642 as recorded In Book 96, Pages 82 -85 Tract No. 12935 as recorded in Book 96, Pages 82 -85 Tract Ho. 12937 as recorded In Book 96, Pages 82-85 Tract No. 12940 as recorded in Book 96 Pages 82,83 Tract No. 12941 as recorded Ir. Book 96, Pages 82 -85 Tract No. 12942 as recorded in Book 96, Pages 82 -85 Official records of San Bernardino County, State of California . 3,6r. L7M RESOLUTION NO. E05- er-2TR S(o - 13q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 (CARYN PLANNED COKVNITY), PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, Part 2 of Division 15 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets & Highways Code authorizes this City Council to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to lnprove and maintain street lighting located therein; and WHEREAS, this City Council desires to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5" to maintain street lights to be located within the boundaries of said Street Lighting District. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: %.y Tit SECTION 1: This City Council hereby proposes the formation of an assessment str c l to be known as "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5" pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 2• The nature, location and extent of the street lights to be maintained Thin Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 are more particularly described to Exhibit A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: The location and extent of Street Lighting Maintenance District Ao -9-1s more particularly described to Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein, and this City Council hereby specifies the designation "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. S" for said district. SECTION 4: The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to cause the preparation and filing of a report with respect to the formation of Street Lighting Maintenance District in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the California Streets & Highways Code. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this t day of •, 19*. AYES: NOES: ASSENT: Jeffrey King, Mayor '367 RESOLUTION No. E j4P*G* & 4+ " 13S' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, GIVING ITS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) WHEREAS, an May 7, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and tiled with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHERJIS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every pa -, thereof, aor<,finds that each and every part of said report tss-,a sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THERFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o sa work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and disc—r —e —in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in saidiXi— sessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for t—'he purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. 1 i M RESOLUTION NO. 0% 9; -221; 9(p-136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC4MONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY), PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, on May 7, 1986, this City Council adopted Resolution No. * proposing the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5' for the purpose of maintaining certain street lighting improvements to be located within said assessment district; and WHEREAS, on May 7, 1986, this City Council preliminarily approved an Engineer's Report with respect to said "Street Lighting Maintenance District P.o. 5' and caused said Engineer's Report to be filed in th- r 'ee of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and AHEREAS, this City'.Council desires to form Street Lighting r Maintenance District No. 5 fbr the maintenance of certain street lighting improvements to be located herein. NOW. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby declares its intention to order the format on o +n assessment district to be known as *Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5' for the purpose of maintaining certain street lighting Improvements therein and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 2: The street lighting improvements to be maintained within the bounUa—rre—S-707 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 are more particularly described to Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: The general location of Street Light ng Nalntenance District -No: 5is rare particularly described on the diagrcm attached at *Exhibit '8' and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4: Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report on file with the Ut-y tTerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a full detailed description of the boundaries of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and of land within said assessment district. r 3cq RESOLUTION NO. EOS -07 -22R Page 2 SECTION 5: This City Council he­.-by sets the date, time and place of a public T ea—r ng on the formation of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 to be as follows: DATE: June 4, 1986 TIME: 7:30 p.m. PLACE: City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line Road City of Rancho Cucamonga SECTION 6: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorized T directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be published at least once, ten (30) days before tha date set for said public hearing in The Re ort, a newspaper of general circualtion published in the City of n ar o an circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City Clerk is also authorized and directed to cause a Notice of Public Hearing to be sent by first class mail to those persons whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized empty assessment roll or the State Board of y� Equalization Assessment roliwith respect to the real property to be included In Street Lighting Maintenance District No. S. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jeffrey King, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. t e et, My ­clerk I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamorga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the * day of *. 19**. Exmtai 'his * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Authelet. City Clerk 370 CITY OF RA,\CHO CCCA.1f0 \G.1 ACC %fr,� MEMORANDUM�� x _= r_� Ip M � Z GATE. April 2, 1986 . TO: Dick Dahl, Councilmmber FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BT: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: I. COMPARISON OF APARTMENT AND CONDOMINIUM STANDARDS 2. MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZES Per your request, the fog lowing summary outlines the differences between apartment and condominium development standards to the City. With few exceptions, the CiW Development Code doesn't distinguish ownership%, - and rental units, i.e. condos and apartments. The Development Code deals with 'multiple family units regardless of ownership status. However, there are sore important differences, as follows: 1. PARKING STANDARDS: The Development Code separates apartments and townhouse /condo parking requirements. The nunbar of parking spaces for apartment units 1s lower as shown on the chart Below: CURRENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS SPACES PER UNIT Apartments Townhouses /Condo's Studio T.-3-- L.3 -- 1 Bedroom 1.3 1.5 2 Bedroom 1.6 1.8 3 Bedroom 1.7 2,0 4 Bedroom 1.9 2,0 Visitor 1.0 per 4 OU's 1.0 per 4 Bu's Currently, one covered space in a garage or carport is required for all multi - family projects. Continued . .. . . . ,37/ memo to Dick Bahl Comparison of Apartment a Condo Standards minimum Dwelling Unit Sizes April 2, 1985 Page 2 2. BUILDING CODE PROVISIONS: The Uniform Building Code doesn't distinguish between apartments and condominiums pe• se, but does have more stringent provisions for attached units separated by actual property lines. Consequently, ownership units located on their own land require additional firewall separations, and separate services such as sewer, water, gas and upgraded electrical capacity. Apartments and ownership units which do not include ownership of land do not have these additional restrictions. The attached memo by the Building Official further clarifies the issue. 3. CONDOMINIUM CONVaSIONS: The City has an ordinance regulating conversions of apartments to condominiums. This ordinance provides that prior to conversion of existing apartments i{,,condominivas. the wall and ceiling separations7g; between units must be 4p to the most current building code standards. The conversion ordinance doesn't establish condo standards that are more restrictive than those for apartments; it simply requires that existing buildings that were built to outdated standards be brought up to date prior to conversion to for sale units. 4. SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS The State Subdivision Nap Act (which regulates the subdivision process in California) requires the filing of a Tentative Tract Nap and approval and recordation of a final Tract Nap prior to the sale of any ownershle units whether or not land is involved, including 'airspace condominiums. Rental apartments can be built and finaled without a Tract Map in most cases. A legal lot of record or a Parcel Map is ail that is required by State law. 5. MINUMUM ONELLING UNIT SIZES Attached, you will also find the results of a telephone survey relative to minimum unit sizes conducted last summer. In general, some of those interviewed indicated the intent for having minimum requirements was the desire 'or better quality development in those comwunities. I hope this information answers your questions 89:OK:jr Attachments �i� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM April 2, 1986 TO: OTTO IGROUTIL, SR. PLA`DIER PROM: JERRY GRANT, BUILDING OFFICIAL P . SUBJECT: BUILDING CODE REQUIRE:dENTS - APARTKE"S, CONDOMINIAIIS, "TONNWJUSES" In response to your request concerning the above, building code differences between thW categories of dwelling use are as follows: True, condominium developments wherein there Is common ownership of the tend upon which the structures rest, are considered the same as apartments under the Uniform Building Colde. There are certain fire resistive requirements that apply when lead division takes place but do not when only air space Is divided such as In a condcminium. The same circumstances occur where tenant space Is divided as In apartments. On tha other han', w land !a actually divided In fee, such as occurs In townhouses, %md Individual ownership of the land occurs, the construction codes require fire separations between adjoining units, separate utility service;. avoidance of passage Of utilities through adjoining lots, etc. In summary, from a building code standpoint true condominiums and apartments are Identical "Townhouses ", where the land is divided, are considered single family units and have different fire restrictive requirements whet In close proximity to the dividing property lines. I hope this provides sufficient Information for your purpose. 47/yo: A,-I, JRGtkl yo>.esr-� see- -/;l& 14ie i4,u is a new Is sde, e%rry 6. j - -_ - ,3 73 I (htpnnted tram aullam;73raadarod, lanuary-reoruary, Iron lit I Separately Owned I Multiple -unit - I Residential ! Buildings by T. t Kayamatsu, P.E. Chief Plan Check Engineer ! International Conference of Building Officials NTROOUCTION occupied by his matt m b. a u,ul located scup, one d the umn,mtead or rmangor anurdy on am dud tmry), such a builomg lea3m4 The co dnion, have not changed \Yhm are tendommium Covered m the Wi tied b u a c«daTNrWL On and one building occupancy claaUheauynlf Unilorm Budding Coder NSnat depeed dK Oil"erha+d,duhabuddurgmwhchdie wllanapacmmt. Eacho«nerownshrwt fu"nesove separauan muss be provided ownerdaun.I lreprdltesddrc n mberd ba the group of ownm" callecuvelyrt W,,,, urub in a condommurrtt must a- starua also owns ax lard upon which his spmuble f« cue nin ai dera[ die busWmg. prop^ryl�ne beanumed' nthe un�tst unit h located. and h c«nWetety mckpen• The nwlting conduwm frc the aputnwm e W. are parapet watts repuvedt Are town dent Mept f« the trail funpunding the buddm8 are eaacdy arose described in the houses pirated differently? In whatmCupLF budding. anestructummilbereferied toss a pre.,oufpuaaraphf «condxmmnum. n clutaraauon should such buildings be eowrtharase. placedl aces die loreg«ng sound famdaart These CONDOMINIU"S C «dominhensasdefuiedabovearec TOWNHOUSES tbwrmuses u nptained preruvdy are are sortie of the numerous questions which Me been vaned regarding mulpple•lenad sidered apartmmta and all the repuuenients for GrauPIt. Dwnlon l Occupancies apply buddlnp Which amwbdsded into indnW- ual iuuu such NU eaN owrurowm %fawn revdenlulbmklmpwhere each undwithin a building d under separate ownership. The (except f«tvv ;w coridcrnlnkem which wit and also has enwtementrothe parceld lard which his unit is located. The key to the answento most d thew questions fall Into a Group R. Division 5 cWsdKa. lion) An — d a unit within •inn• upon building are owned yards m{ Is how it* bunldhng h actually constructed andthh. mbmn. wdldelermnawhedurthe damWum own, - trighl only then pace occvs�edbyhis unir� fwiondtfa= tr j« Yby the ownmdNe townhaute. Jointly try the Eachunhmay be only one MY I- height but poNslont for a Getup R. Division 1 « Group P. Dwislon 5 will apply. uponwhkfaMbuifdmghsinutel. dasun CIA be two« even three loambnuTdt assumed) stories in brig%. In rounding grou«b, luny walls, ewndon. services other than dose within Index - emstrucsnon aerytase, die ownerhu eadinrvetsx lithe CONDOMINIUMSORTOWNHOUSEST derd unit, st,dr as einsiCal, water gat. ["upon which hls unit hsconstrucL& Whetter a multiple -unit buidmg with sewers, tic.. become pmt responsibilities rvevisiomwd%nbuddutg cocks mwriT- each unhtunderseparueownnshapis called atardanunuumtoramwn)aarul «ndera4 of an dw mien u tenants In common. Aeccrdmgh; s«tnkpl agremien among tmbucdondiepremnethubui;&nV t be stuounilly 4dependent and located Bed by any oilier name) is really unrnaeenat all the owners will be necintany for the wadun one r9irtmibet of its own parcel of Inidu as bnidirg code apphcatwn a con• ownership and maintenance of asese area lard. Ee., widen the boundadtsd its prop. cemed. The ultimate goal n to dcmrmam owned in conunsit. The buaWng may be erty Imes• eatp for P�reed pralecbons under whit occupancy group a building usumed to rerluheno special busidingcode into public property. Recording d property should beclasuried For the prrpotesdtlus coinplwice odw Nan that for a typical lines between adjacent Parctlsd land hate article. however a defo.m&✓•noon Will apamnerebmlding. mehod by which boundaries of ownership be made between the 1 ms -can. In order to support the position described weesubhshed. In CAerwonh. between ad• domsmums" and 'townhouses- The fol• mdneprtruan parayaph, ktusustmedau {ueN unro widen a townhouse. property, lowing concepts apply to mulliple- 4 connitrnal b Maw as web as to rnden• aycupdtert udhduals budtaten•und. twoatory apartment budding wtN eQtsal Met msdt lot estaLlashed vice cue ad)acmt parcels of lard arc owned sepanxly aril i sat bmidints, butbmusemostdNe pries• shares f« raving or leasing purposes. Un• respecthelybyovrnersdaitunles. tam raded have been related lo residential test otherwise specifically stated in die rest. Relining to FIGURE I. DraP'rtY lines btWdmp Visa hr will be ) united Hereto N{w teasing agrees w. cue upkeep and 2.11,7.10,4.9 and 5d mustbe established A B. 8 and C. C and D. s b a nut"l, if the method of owrienhip of wai within a btulding is such that it is nuN.mance of the <tmnbuilding becomes the rnismsUily,ddrtmownen. Now let between struts and and D and E. respectively. Code rryul a ( pas�hie l «mownermotmadya(r atact wassiine Nat each of ihewmen decides to mints based cn location on property set _ .. i 1 2 3 i 1 x x } a } s e I i A _L_1 g I C I D E I I �� 2 11 In i . FIGURE I kids in Section UP are applicable to thew U Unction, ba waIbandwailepeanpfacmrgd,,,, eror i in Section)( property Imes between amts, a asind'Kaed Woputy Imes should also be established a an accepab between the boundarYOLNeerwre budding m mint Wtwei and the adminuis commm�,n popery Lnce d dnion. U IN the was and am, mpecuw panels 01 land l levdnceed are Idependendy owned and the raison t the same OMPInC : in Other words the building is a wrier a a row hhus, tometrroes tdened to as tin, houses) of swgfea'anuly din -lnnp abuoingeach Other in order to Quald, cam Pkely as an R -3 Occupancy. however, d. enor v ju a the 64propmy Imes ShadA be RWedY COnftructed and w Ket to the I" must be mdependenl a, heit•nefttt WAN Con ountlon each erw con I d5ketfiomthewallmaybe,ub,titwedfat I the parapet as Pnmmed w the ewepnen in Secbos 505 idl for area separation wag,. Section 170914 tiusa nwmberofncepom w I" d a condnaon, under which pea - RiomaybeOtmaed Swcethe$- Ioxpre._ hour roof is not bled as one d the eacep• . nom, the code does not teeognae this aftenwe. Is a pemuss.ble to catWlKt a Leak tw - hciu uea wparatansea II in ties, d two mde- Pendent anehpur wait at the uperior prop. arty Imes U. townhomecomnucnont This is another Question which is often to sed. Sec. lion 505 W1 Raes.In put, do 'Each ponm da bwWmg sepuued byoneormorearea �r separation rolls maybe comideied a W. I� j rate bwldmg A single tvo.hour Lea sepuunrl wall could bees effecow. or per. laps more so in some respect, from a Eve- ne otx -Iwur wal4 ,q um at propy u loos. This is wrier the awmplicn the the two-hour wall is norpWcedwuh opmuip since the consdernion is far an aftemue for a pant d oew -bqn wall — pro hdut arty openmp w p s w504 roperty his, C.0 v wags. A 30-Nch puapn may also be m j1 cowpasbwl'Kated Qwred fa the lx Wert a lmewallL (� U AsNgle faring Ptacvalil:loprohiylthearea separation =� ouldonLidlet withLegal algned wall inns bamg p+ertad may be eater rod ' y witwmem. In ad- than done. This statement would also bcnn! f7 d wry rout ri my for the requited fuarepsmt• emeeioa prop. 'r am pnapetd enY luiewaIIL In the kteraw, howewecd irartsislnve inn- the metier face of the eaten wall wduna he'ftis and h Peroed, one lore escaw memhane d be aorrded. fro dm wall Oil remain, wpuaung U from lone been raised the wet wall of the adjacent s,me See Itedforadstance FIGUREII DETAIL - 6L 3. -71--- - - -- i C s� C p da bwWmg sepuued byoneormorearea �r separation rolls maybe comideied a W. I� j rate bwldmg A single tvo.hour Lea sepuunrl wall could bees effecow. or per. laps more so in some respect, from a Eve- ne otx -Iwur wal4 ,q um at propy u loos. This is wrier the awmplicn the the two-hour wall is norpWcedwuh opmuip since the consdernion is far an aftemue for a pant d oew -bqn wall — pro hdut arty openmp w p s w504 roperty his, C.0 v wags. A 30-Nch puapn may also be m j1 cowpasbwl'Kated Qwred fa the lx Wert a lmewallL (� U AsNgle faring Ptacvalil:loprohiylthearea separation =� ouldonLidlet withLegal algned wall inns bamg p+ertad may be eater rod ' y witwmem. In ad- than done. This statement would also bcnn! f7 d wry rout ri my for the requited fuarepsmt• emeeioa prop. 'r am pnapetd enY luiewaIIL In the kteraw, howewecd irartsislnve inn- the metier face of the eaten wall wduna he'ftis and h Peroed, one lore escaw memhane d be aorrded. fro dm wall Oil remain, wpuaung U from lone been raised the wet wall of the adjacent s,me See Itedforadstance FIGUREII DETAIL - 6L 3. -71--- - - -- i C s� C p FIGUREII DETAIL - 6L 3. -71--- - - -- i C s� C p u FIRE - RESISTIVE MWO"NES PIERCES MEMBRA TWGONE- HOUR%VALLS FIRE- RESESTWE MEMBRANES PIERCED / MEMBRANE rear as urdioted in FIGURE 'A New let m a.sume that the zwing ordinances were 4uchtW aemselbicEswertpermreed.i e.. consWCIg Is permitted to Odend b all Up of thn he may comm&I a house and Wage as mdwated. The eateriarw+llsn the mterw property line which are adlacm b Iw 28 and 30 nxW be of one -tour fue- msiltnt conswcuon and, funhermae. one -hour parapetf may be reou.ed. \Valli la0ng the fAJOOt seeet and 20-bot alley need rust be fire mpgr,, mere the center I'mO(Werts" Oe" maybe cwWemd a the property line for the W MM, of deter - mrningpint dlerwwall and opem ng p-p. tectwns, based on Secpon 504. Sewers, water gas. elecm0ty, et:.. sernces should FIGURE 111 be connected to the street or alley'uuh,, vosuerg mtenorWWenY hiesmte"'Wtae 28 Of 30. rm sure we world All 4gree that the budding must be strut orally mdepem der. The owners of I= 28 and 30, may OF let 24. By repeating Liu, the remaining los, the and W a mw of R -3 Occumarc awned es Group R Dinslon 3 O=pan. ciet The la per which each una d con. suucted must be owned by the ant owner. and the build.. erected rhn.n. ni.. ,h. aanwmg may M compared to dsa' meets and alleys N this eaampte purposes OF escabbshmg r erke w FIGUREIV """ "u"'e ctnaoomwnunq "ample must be satisfied In snuctlon of a townhouse as dtfe ' emd Group R. DhndonJ Occupuneks, Lin. SINGLE TNO -HOUR WALL less canpteU Independence is presided, a"ymol6ple4rnil residential buildingwodd fall Into a Group e, Dwis,an 1; b aler FIGUREW Inthecaseofa �� words. a condomrrvum —u ddmdeadrtt 'WH. d the face der twMouwall wuhln a unit Is a and N ado for amts and wsthln a OTHER tCOM8s 5 and the wa�tse8 becpmedre recent "Posed V. list- arIt FIGUREhe erect separately towdwus' c be c a sw ter, ,% W*o` —W(L the pY vious m the ut dut is pu order for u It list been It his �pl o � M order f with(" a should bekc wSet 4--h be Aeptw mind dWwhersshe etecothe e14- yuoatsobelMeperdentd Y. M. use is be In ep Theydwuldrwraouoverprop- to.into as bwlding 3OcupnciesCt as Groupec OwywJ twn)4e al" are reMtunto am no ur wall dse adjacent am no " linnet esly lines established between uo Farm would be however, to hm each urvi ecom. would be ndlirmsaey from&,humabd.. Pletche inotsa from h longer longer comptearte independent d tub ent beer R a sepum own conk%[ n b ution or maw drslnb dent u cdleao Provided Imes b save to art c1e &dependent rusthe paid d tch con. mused on a parcel d land whch n also owned the miner the unite u she btma mated between she Umm,k c, ( mWbemadebetwe n eqire knarateandrepiragmee required. Amain kry n also ry i necessary twhatallof What happens when when dmtdtachoNec What due co the ce"the walla between ahem. Nler Ilse . Afmr weigting the two• forsndrepaaayeemeruwdlbpneas. saryfoovd% r%hOS *1XU dKyaroltems djantowmsdtrya SetfIGUREV. an MsRe j all dr8rsecpdn:orns ut noesapsfiedr du twodasirrglt Awn tee compared b two one -lsoro walls .P+4edgdmpmpwYtwebydnecode.the Perhaps the townhouse concept could be better Ies us 4WU that each d the wits ofa muhrple -wt dwelf.g meets all d the r decision ls kh to de budding official for eaplahRd dwe were to begin with a subdivided no containing, foetaarnplt, a Cufrenems for townhouses prewieurty du. cussed but dust they am nor pvMW with ac"punCea rejection d the amt septa- donwallasan alterrute, See$Kdm 105. row of 40-W wide lets fronting on a 60- foawvde meet 20400t a:ley Independent fue -raid walls (man alternate with a at the twulsour area uparatwn wall approved by ., r 1Cem.wnty i 62 die bw [dos ohc,ah u the Px perry lee, the abu"property we all .j a unglewall of Perhaps one -hour Ore- resusuve con. Wuclnn. Desp,le The fect Out the owner of each ml also owns the puce[ of land upon wroth ?us and n located. the angle -wall conoaucten At the pmMry due cratcf caoutwty among the wb. rrt lung m is Single bwN,%. e. an awrtnmat houe If Ihch other emcH are wero, ruected.ndt rub epenacross the rnenm and a s lore Interdependence n created and a wn,lar eorduanc Clan H u<A taus the proper, Croup t. tl,nJ,cahp, to, 'he b,build n Crow R. ot+ IIncep.n,•aliec mrorha gt n w:A umn ncwufed aya JMSUiIy R would be xm,, to Sa , Iha1 L, rnpp M muipdedwellu,g -wu bu'A,rgs c,,. wg of Ihme ot more wins •.here the wits e sepustely awned are conudered ,n- nuNUr.,sard are egabted by t\ecooe as arurentl a Group R. Drwuon I Occu n runt Inctudmg P arc Pe pel of ,W es WkKh each mi ncooun c:ed. w d&L services to each =1 are udepeodM dasuied as townhwres, these M,;d. M mrAlted ape e7wrmr b fd up R. D,vnicn I Ottuparaes rgardlefsa the mnhcd of IMnerstup of Ilwg was wnhu, a budding when Jere Daly two umb•u hbudmn are m,. I /L COMMONOWNER4116J e_ P-57- S FIGURE V So' ALLEY 20, to' r'ab' a0 r INTERIOR PRERIOR I 1 MOPEM PROPERTY NESS 27 AWES , T4O40' II I E . • - -••O E P-57- S FIGURE V So' ALLEY 20, STREET 60. FIGURE V11 63 377 a LS' L1 �I a� to' r'ab' a0 r INTERIOR MOPEM I L._. NESS 27 1 2g i 29 T4O40' II I STREET 60. FIGURE V11 63 377 a LS' L1 �I a� +tJF7i� C STAFF TELEP60NE SURVEY, August 15, 1985 CITY MINIMUM OVELLIIIG UNIT SIZES CNINO No Standards , Possible new standards now being considered IRVINE No Standards - Just use UBC FONTANA Dwelling Unit Size Based on Zoning as Follows: R_1 Minimum Lot Size 7,200 sq. ft. -ail R1 Zanez A11 Single Family Units R -1 -C 1,100 sq. ft. R -1 -0 1,200 sq. ft. R -1 -E 1,300 sq. ft. R -1 -F 1,400 sq. ft. —2-17300 sq- ft. if single family detached s 650 sq. ft. if multt- family 9_3 8SO sq. ft. if single family detached ( Soo sq. ft. if multi - family MONTCLAIR• Minimum Site Based on Dwelling Unit Type as Follows: (a) Single Family Detached Units: .42 bdrms - 1,300 sq. ft. 3 bdrms or more - 1,400 sq. ft. ,(b) Multi- Faolt!.Units (Apt. & Cando) 1 bdrm 950 sq. ft. 2 bdrms 1,200 sq. ft. 3 bdrms 1,400 sq. ft. 4 bdrms 1,450 sq. ft. • Minimum Room Site of 110 sq. ft. • All dwelling units require 2 -car garage, no carports ONTARIO No Standards r, E` 9 F UPLAND a+elltn 9 Unit Slte Standards as Follows: ZON°_ Sfngle MIN. LOT AREA sq' t' MIN. 0/U SIZE Ts `q. F La y Zones t. R5 -15 20,000 - 2,000 R -S -10 15,000 10,000 1,800 R -S -1.5 R -S -6 6•� 1,600 1,400 900 Multi Multi- Fa�n�s R -4 -4.4 R- M- 3.6(c) 30,000 L,000 /du R - M -3.6 30,000 15,000 1,000 /du R -M -2.0 R -M -1.5 16,000 1,000 /du 1.000 /du 1 500 500 - Bachelor 113►' 100 - 1 Bdrm 800 r 2 Bdrm 1,000 - d Bdrm 5 ecial 1,000 9q. ft. for a 1 Bedroom plus 200 sq. ft. for additional Bedroom 3 C C DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CCC iMONGA MEMORANDUM February 3. 1[.Ee Robert Rizzo, Assistant City ��Man/ er Otto Kroutil, Senior Plaener y/ L410 USE RECOY.YENOATIONS BY THE CITIZEt1S ADVISORY c%�c% Vr'4 077 1 Per your request, the following is a chronological sugma.y of the events initiated by the Citizens Advisory Commission's recommendations to the City Council relative to the City's General Plan: AP-0-110- 1985 - The CAC passes a resolution recommending substantial across- - osrd reductions in density in all our residential land use categories from LowVIum and higher. aY mil 17 1985 - The City Council refers the Advisory Commission's reques a Planning Commission for review and recommendation, with Council review of the issues $Cheduled for May 15, 1985. Key B, 1985 - The Planning Cometsston reviews the various policy oD o� nsi s, and reaches consensus indicating that across -the -board reductions of density in the General Plan as recommended by tha CAC would not be desirable at this tiae. However, as to the remaining alternatives, then was a split vote in the absence of one Commissioner: two votes in support of the alternative to look at sites on a case -by -use basis, and two votes in support of the no change alternative. N�1985 - Th- City Council considers both the CAC and Planning on recommendations and requests a comprehensive look at the issue of multi - family unit growth with specific information requested of staff. The policy alternatives to to addressed and -brought back by staff for Council consideration include: A. The effect of financing incentives and multi - family bonds on growth in the City; B. Controls on rate of growth /growth manaaemmnt; C. Controls on de•elopment through up- graded development standards, and 0. Reduction of densities through reconsideration of the General Plan in specified areas or city -wide. ■ Memo to Bob Ritta Subj: CAC land Use Recoemendations February 7, 1986 Page 2 Vust 21 1985 - Follo.�ing a lecWthy review of the report presented, e ounc opts not to pursue any of the alternatives presented. r;Ity The emotion is to take ro: action and move forward on other business. The attached mattrials Include key reports and minute: for your review. OK: jr CC: Brad Buller Tan Coleman ON fC •• au -, C C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C MEMORANDUM April 10, 1985 TOr Mayor and Meabers or City Council PECM, Advisory Cosalasion Mesbers, RTr Robert A. Rizzo r /�J lsslatant to City ManaRar SWECTs Land Os• Racoaeedatiow by ldv soey Coalsaion The Advisory Cosaissioa at its March 28, 1965 seating recommended that the "*Moving lnrcrsation be ro,varded to the City Council and Planning Commission for consideration. yes. She Advisory ComsU�al+on rinds and recoma inch as follows, This City has long desires to maintain a rural anvironaent to Cthe nazi-- extant feasible. This City has allowed the construction or large amounts of blab density dwellings durida the past trim years. There are many afore high density dwelling projects approved or avaiting approval. C Too many high deesity dweL.iiU projects are iaconsisteat vlth the Kabes of the citizens or this City, deteriorate our resources and produce serious consequences of erm ding. Svift and certain 1L-its must be placed on the proliferation or high density dwelling projsots. Tbererore, it L hereby RESCLTM that the ldvisory Commission ncoaends to the City Council and Flaming Commission that the pnaral plan add zoaidg ordinances or this city be aaanded to arreot a change in allowable density ranges along the following guicelldesr Continued.... 36.) M c c April to, 1955 2 Land U34 Reco3endatiocs RMg RAMS SIZE 3116 tl0V PROPOSZD R• LM no chugs no change L no Chugs w e M 6�tt 5 -6 MR g at -2t T -9 10 -13 Z 24-30 It -1R 19 or more CIJP RZJOLVED further that any Lmbelsoce this creates in the goneral and acting plats should be id3usted by Commercial and Sadustrial changes. RESOLVED further them the category •Z• represents Intense development, that It be permitted on cc ere than I /10 of if ?.y. of the residW#Cally scaed land mad ttirt It be Controlled by conditional rye permit standards tdrich demand amelioration of all eftects of high density to s depw that they bare no greater impact of the resources and adverse afteets of orowditg than would one dwlling unit Gj the acre. If You have any questions or coaoerra regarding this matter, Please fell hee to contact se. RARrah !I-Tw -a ' 3 i CITY OF RANCHO CCCA`„0 \GA STAFF REPORT C DATE: may 8, 1985 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Krcutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: LA,1M MM N RECO.MMENDATi0N5 BY THE CITIZENS ADVISORY I. it. C ABSTRACT: This report outlines CAC recommendations an General Plan enTi s-MY reductions, and notes the implications. It also provides Policy options to be considered by the Commission. Staff is seeking poli.y direction only for recommendation to the City Council. BACKGROUND: At a recant Citizens Advisory Commission meeting, a reso ut on was passed recommending to the City Council a reconsideration of the residential categories in the City's General Plan. The CAC Resolution, attached to this report as Exhibit •A•, recommends substantial across the board reductions in densities in all residential land use categories from Low Medium and higher. Specific CAC recommendations are noted below: Land Use Category Exit Pro osed VLL 2-4 ange LM 4-8 No Change N 8 -14 5 - MH 14 -24 0 -g 9 H 24-30 '.1.18 In addition, the CAC recommended that for densities above 19 units to the acre, a category of •I• (representing intense development), be created. This coteggcry would be permitted on no more than one - tenth of a Percent (M) of the residentially zoned land in the City and would be controlled by a Conditional Use Permit process, which would demand 'amelioration of all effects of high density to a degree that they have no greater impact on the resources and adverse affects of crowding than would on► dwelling unit per acre•. The reasons for this recommendation by the CAC are also stated in the resolution (please see resolution for specific text). They can be summarized as foilcws: .may ITEM 0 CAC Land Use Room dations'" May 8. 1935 Page 2 Ci 1. Desire to maintain a rural environment in the City; 2. Construction of large amunts of high density projects in the past; 3. Number of high density projects already approved; 4. Too many such high density projects are inconsistent with the wishes of the residents of the City. The City Council has briefly considered the CAC resolutin and referred the Item to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation n the general direction the City Council should cake on this matter. The Item is scheduled for Council review (basic policy issues only) at the May IS, 1985 City Council meeting. III. ANALYSIS- Th%Mcommendattons made by the CAC have far- reachlo`gu app UtTons affecting just about all development related areas under the City's jurisdiction. Adoption of the CAC recommendations as City's General Pine diotheruregulatory documentsraffectin public the Policy- To faplment the recommendations, the following Plas and documents would require modification: General Plan: Revisions to several mandated elements of the TFera n would be required, including land use, circulation, housing, public safety, and recreation, to correct an Imbalance between housing and commercial /industrial usas, to reassess demand for infrastructure, modify service provisions, etc. The changes would be required to provide internal consistency among all mandated General Plan elements. This would be a major effort Involving substantial resources. Zoning ( Development District) Mao• Modify designations for ccnslSLNcy with the enera an to assure balance among General Plan and zoning categories. Develo ant Code: Restructure and modify most residential categor es to assure consistency with General Plan. Modify specific development standards t o be reflective of new density ranges. Develop criteria for I designation as recommended by CAC. C PLA4913G C0.44I5SI0'r'TAFP :tpJa; CA' Land Use Reca•. Jations May 8, 1985 Page 3 r,annem Lomuen tlesis ecific Plans: The City's General Plan also contra s errs Vista, ctor a, an Caryr. Planned Communities, in addition to the Etiwanda Specific Plan. All these areas are not governed by the Development Code, but have their own text developed to deal with specific circumstances. To complicate the matter, the City also has development agreements•with the builders of Terra Vista and Caryn Planned Comunities, which legally bind the City to long -term land use commitments. The City's substantial financial stake in the Victoria Regional Center also complicates any potential revisions which might result in substantial density decreases in the Victoria Planned Community. Other Issues: In addition to the regulatory documents, the City wou d nod to reassess its capital improvement program, parks program and lonD -term planning for major facilities. Special districts providin services in the City would also be affected in their long- rangeqamiing and implementation. w All these charges would require a coordinated effort on the part of the City's various departments and special districts. CShould the Piannin Commission concur with the recommendations of the CAC, staff will prepare a detailed work program to deal effectively with all the necessary changes and will incorporate these changes into Fiscal 85-86 program year for City Council review. IV. POLICY ALTERNATIVES: Should the Commission concur with some OF the goals expressed y the Advisory Commission but find itself reluctant to attempt a wholesale revision of the City's General Plan and related documents, other policy options could be considered. These options could result in an overall reduction in density with particular emphasis on those areas the Commission might consider appropriate. The first question that must be answered is whether or not whatever density reductions take place should occur citywide, thus affecting the General Plan, or outside of the planned communities only (i.e. in the area governed by the Development Code). Staff will need specific direction in this area, as well as feedback on the following options: C M CAC Land Uze peco�.,dstfons 1 may 8. 1985 Page 4 p its i o A: d ed Use Cate woulRIuv eftd nd oorles Only Involve review o nd v duo and use categories for Possible modifications. Since a specific area of concern to the CAC are densities above 19 du /ac, the Commission may wish to consider modifying the MH and H categories as follows: Designation Ext�sttn_q p osed 14 -24 au /ac _-Em posed ac Densities above 19 du /ac permitted with specific findings only (CUP 7) H 24 -30 du /ac 24 -27 du /ac Densities above 27 du /ac • permitted with specific findings only _ These modlflcatlotm would result to narrowing the density range spread In the higher density categories. Further, the City would density bpeosltelioratedrequire hrough that the applicati m feofs specific mandatory findings. Staff will need specific direction as to whether this approach 1s appropriate and if so, which land use categories are to be considered for revision. be to reassess the density Eeslgnatlom. land not yet approved for developm site -by -site revier of upper densit locations. The attached Exhibit 08 outside the planned communities cu Medium -High, and High density, but not by the City. The Commission may wish Of some of these site - specific areas to rease to density would All vacant residential This would involve lgnations to various leates all such land approved for developmenC consider a redesignatlen ier density designations. Staff will need specific direction on this policy option. Option C - Combination of A and 8 Above (Reduction n alts dens ty categor ez and site - specific locations) This would involve an assessment of both land use cite9pry designations and site - specific locations, as described above. This option has the potential of reducing overall densities substantially without drastic changes to either the text and provisions of the Development Code, or wholesale site - specific designation changes. C C C CAC Land Use Recaz .•da:tons May 8, 1485 Page S Staff will need direction as to the feasibility of this policy option. The final policy alternative for consideration is no change. The Commmtssion may select this alternative if It feels the City's General Plan and Development Code a e well balanced and that no substantial changes are warranted. V. RECOMENDAriON5: At this point, staff needs policy direction on y, o cy a ernatives and options available are noted below. Alternative 1: Reduce density per CAC recoutendatlons.* Alternative 2: Reduce density through: 05Fro—aW.— Reduction in specific land use categories only; or Option 8: Reduction in site- sptctfte areas only; or Option C: Combination of A Z 8 above. $r Alternative 3_ No ange recasaided It is respectfully requested that the Commission p: -vide staff with specific policy direction to be forwarded to the City Council. 3$g 9 CITY OF?A- ;CHOCUCA TONGA MEMORANDUM April 10, 1985 rot Mayor and Members or City Council VROM: ldvisory Coaaission 1leabers all Hobert A. Rizzo Assistant to City Manager rP SVBJECTt Land Use Reccoeadations by Advisory Coaaission The Advisory Cosalasion at its March 28, 1985 meeting recoaaeaded that the following information be forwarded to the City Couac:l and plaarisg CoaLsloa for consideration. The Advisory Coaoisaiom finds mad re000ends es follows: This City W 1oQr`deaired to aeiatain a rural nnvirooaent to the ozlaia extent feasible. This City has allowed the construction of large iaamta or high density dwellings during the past two years. There are many more high density dwelling projects approved or awaiting approval. Too aany high density dwelling projects are inconsistent with the wishes of the oltltans of this City, deteriorate our resources and produce serious consequences of crowding. Swift and certain limits Sant be placed on the proliferation Of high density dwelling projects. Therefore, It is hereby RESOLVED that the Advisory Coaaiaaion recoaends to the City Council and planning Commission that the Racers, plan and toning ordinances of this City be amended to effect a change in allowable density ranges along the following guidelines, Continued.... Tom_ s 10 April 10, IS35 2 Lard Uaa 1scc_1n_aaon3 . l RME SIZE NAl2 BILE + ROV PROPOSED TL no change chalk" L`P no than" 4-1 no Chan" 8 -14 H 14-24 10913 I 2tl -,0 19 -18 19 or more CUP RESOLVED further that any imbalance this Creates in the general and zoning plans should be adjusted by coamerelal and industrial Changes. RESOLVED further that the category e1e represeets Intense development, that it be perattted an no aorc than 1/10 of 1% Of the residentially soled land and that it be controlled by conditions' We permit standards which demand Melioration of all effects 'Whigy density to a degree thct they have no greater LoWt. an the resources and crowding than would one dwelling unit to the vacre. effects of C If you have any questiooa or concerns r. Please C@*'- :rem to costaot M. "rdisg this matter, RARrak C 350 C c C City Cescit Nlaates May I3. 1995 Page 10 (29) J *Cs Lag, tcsalty 0artlom.st Olrcetere stated that* spay two raesial*j Is. 9"s to bo resdeed. We sow !nun a ydes at Projects soh /ttod "der tbi City* progrs, led they mold IW to request nlesio to Ptacrad to dweller this as a @WU frilly Pratte is ordy to Lot the fee study dour which will bo drew it the dsyslycr's cost. W rnaaaadstis was Jas Jasslct, NOTION: Myd by byre(, wscaeded Debt to authorise staff to contact (atsrett- ad parties in a City bad Protests ur1 that they 907 for the (Wisp. Notlen "tried u"atstody 5-0. •fffff (3O) 40. - Lariew of pally "cur usedatleta by the rleadq Casgis*ls relating to the Yet*oy Cc LSOL"'o reccseadotle" on 1W us, its Cottsstd clog yrll 17. 1995 stating. suit report by Otto trstit. ladsy nasal. Major tlkele epeesd the ststiag for Pabilt tarot. Ydressiag Council ware, No lays reside" of [ttwas", toted that Dew of their Caseors, wr.* that developers traded to build at tae sprat limits of a fluty. It m their latest that a durdopet risk the siddl• ratio., cot the higher ranges is dursleyiss. sickest fares. gsbor of the gid. A. 4trtr, thalrmas of the Yrlaoy usteals. yi Jeff "arses. 6111 Will" Way. Stores lard, Willis Les Copy. There Ming so further reorients fro its "bllc. May" MIkeLs closed the robin rustics of the staling. M TMa Mooed by 1Wals, se COSded by Debt to direct .off to Proper* for the City Coseit It aesyds Of rhos* brodite due is the 13-14. sad 21 -10 densi- ties araltdlM these is durdelgnt sgaasestas to lent at this. sad relay thew to the Plaguing Castiado and the ddul.ry Castsds to femtato tag - eseodatirs beck to the City "Neil far o final dsctdo. CostilW fast 3 -�etel that we look at de"iy bourses also. Notlas carried unaelgosly (11) 6N. tgOtttf R reed 6COR tW Yom JA 1ICI71C in MUMC 101 or ItAWN W (its rsgered at the sprlleunt's request). fasaaa (71) d►. LVM IM, thulThdMJ Jf1 MOTIONt tared by Marls seesfded by W 10t to uuyls the Mayer to dun the s*edaaurs to the Joist Porn dsthsyity. cLeglag W fsdlag fertile, Matto "hied satdnewly 34 f•f••f 6C. AMID Itlllt ranlPgurtoN Or ♦ NLRINO Myot E14L sytesoed that was should tot • C "It wtiat Patsy to t"rtt" of the budget. eL CITY OF RAXCHO CVCf IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 21, 1985 3 � l9 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Otto Kroutii, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF POSSIBLE 'CONTROLS ON MULTIPLE FAMILY rmapmgtr I. ABSTRACT: This report contains information requested by the City unc on possible ways to improve the City's controls on multiple- family development. Alternatives presented include financing incentives, growth management, and possible revision to Ina General P1aq%yr Development Standards. Staff is requesting direction as to t,lle alternatives to be explored further. II. BACKGROUND: Over the course of the past several months, concerns over the rapid growth of multiple family housing, and apartments to particular, ha4e been noted by the City Council. On different occasions, members of the Council requested that staff provide information dealing with the number of apartment units built and planned in the City, data on the implication of multi - family bond financing, and consideration of minimum dwelling sizes in the City. In addition, on May 15, 1985, the City Council reviewed recommendations br the Planning Commission relative to reconslAerat:on of overall General Plan densities, as recommended by the Citizens Advisory Commission. The Planning Commission discussed the General Plan issue at length, and recommended against wholesale revisions to the General Plan and the Development Code. eouA x, if the City's General Plan is to be wilified and densities lowered, the Commission felt such modifications should be based an a site -by -site review and analysis of upper density designations In various areas of the City. To date, no final action has beet taken by the City Council on any of these items. masher was requested to combine these varicus items into a more comprehensive report, outlining ue possible alternatives the City has available to deal with the question of multi- family housing in a comprehensive fashion. The purpose of this report is to present all these alternatives. .393 ?o J � Y .L CITY COU'iC1; 5•..F- ` Hultiple Family D& v)paent August 21, 1985 page 2 &II. ALTERNATIVE_°: There are numerous alternatives available to deal with the rate, volure, and quality of multi - 'amity housing in the City. Based an the Council's request, the following are presented to this report: 1. Financ4n icenttvas /multi- family bonds; 2. Controls on rata of growth /growth management; 3. Controls on development through upgraded development standards (including minimus dwelling sizes); and, 4. Reduction of density through reconsideration of the General plan to specified areas. ¢may" Each one of these alternatives is addressed to the following sections of the report. In the interest of clarity, and to allow comparisons among the variout alternatives, each option is presented to a separate section of the report. Additional supporting information is attached in the form of an appendix. `\ CTY COO'ICIL ST7.% 'Por C Multiple Family 0- lopment August 21, 1985 Page 3 ALTERfMTIVE A. FTNAKING INCENTIVES/MULTI— FAMILY BONDS: Subsides Of some sort, i.e. local, federal and /or state, have played an important part In the development of multi - family housing In Rancho Cucamonga since 1978. For the purposes of this discussion, these subsidies can be classified as folluws: I. Multi - Family Construction Bond! This technique is used to provide lower interest construction loans for the builders Of various multi-family projects. The reduced interest rate is possible through the issuance of tax free bonds. The City's involvement in this process is through the issuance of an inducement resolution which 1s necessary for the bonds to obtain tax free status. To date, the City has passed such inducement resolutions Only for senior housing; however, the County of San Bernardino has passed lnducement� _ resolutions`>W construction of other multi- /am11y projects 1n ' Rancho Cucamonga under a cooperative agreement with the City. The advantage of construction bond financin g lies In the builder's ability to build a proea t for less. In turn, under state and federal requirements 20a; of the units so financed must be made available to people of law and moderate income (in 1985 dollars, this translates to to annual household Intone limit of about $20,800 for a frailly Of 4). Though it cannot be stated chat the availability of construction bond financing makes eon.ible construction of projects which could not otherwise be built, it is clear that multi - family bonds have had a substantial inducement effect on the construction of such housing. It can Only be assumed that the elimination Of multi- family bond construction financing would have a substantial moderating effect on apartment growth. 2. Mortgage Revenue Bonds Unlike the construction bonds described above, Mortgage Revenue Bonds are used to lower mortgage rates for individual home bu ers. In Rancho Cucamonga., Mortgage Revenue on s have e used successfully, predominantly with single family projects. However, several multiple family projects, built and sold as condominiums, are also a part of the program. The advantage of this program 1s in the reduced mortgage rates, and consequently the reduced monthly mortgage payments for the individual home buyers. The builder also benefits in that projects with available below market rate financing are easier to sell and are consNiently less risky to develop. C CITY C INVL S'AFr 2.2- Multiple Family De`elop-ent August 21, 1985 Page 4 This program applies to for- ure %ase units only and predominantly to single farm y rest encos, a s probably outside the scope of the Council's request. Modification of this program would also have a substantial effect on future Single-family housing. 3. Senior Nousinc Subsidies Senior Housing has not been an issue of concern in the past. This discussion is only Included to complete the picture. The City uses its Senior Housing Overlay District in conjunction with Development Agreements as a tool to provide adequate affordable housing for senior citizens. Senior Overlay provisions allow the City to provide various incentives to builders of senior projects, from financial participation in the project improvements, availability of bond financing, to density Incentives. The developer, in return, provides guarantees to keep the rental rates at below market levels lift a spectfWperiod of time. 4. Other Subsidies COther subsides include Section 8 financing and other state and federal programs for lower income housing. Most of these are cutside the City's jurisdiction and scope of direct control. An existing City policy limits the concentration of tower income housing to 20% In any one project. In the future, the City will have an opportunity to comment on location and development of such projects. aSM"Y: Since 1978, 2110 mutt - family units have been built or are 1132 (i.e. about 154%) have received osome sort0of these peciallfinancing incentives. Though a cause and effect relationship cannot be firmly established, it is apparent that a substantial number of units would not have been built without some sort of Subsidy. If a particular concern with the Council Is the availablity of multi- family rental housing, a confirmation of Council policy on multi- family construction bonds would be appropriate. The life of this program has recently been extended by state legislation to January 1 988 and funding increased to 11.5 Billicn statewide. The available options include: A. Elimination of future multiple - family bonds for use to the City; or C8. Issuance of Inducement Resolutions for multi- family bonds on a fted for Staffncoulddprepareisuch criteria for Councils review if appropriate. CITY LOUXIL StAF •Popr. Nu tt tp le Family 0„lopmsnt August 21, 1905 Page 5 ALTEMUTIYE 9. comma OM RATE OF Gn'"GROYIM MANAGEMENT Consideration Ordinance would aaffect ithe pace dattwhich development hIs permitted to occur. However_ growth management controls would probably have a very limited effect on community. the total ultimate butldout of the Controls on the rate of growth are limited by the Government Code to rather soeciflc conditions, and must be tied directly into the City's inability to meet required public services or facilities through the normal development Process. The attached memo by the City Attorney (Appendix B) explores the issue in greater detail; however, the major points are summarized below: 1. An ordinance limiting the numb -ir of dwelling units to be constructed in a given period must be based on findings that the promotion of public health, safety and welfare necessitate&. such growtifeantrols; 2. Such controls are necessary to meet specified public service or facility needs (such as sewers, schools, etc.); 3. There is no authority for a Growth Management Ordinance which does nothing more than create a baiAnca between multi - family and single family dwellings; and 4. There must be an overall public infrastructure or public service need that use es growth management controls for all housing, not just any one type in any given area. ity wln C to the Witty Attorney's analysis, it is apparent that the City wouy ld first need to demonstrate a significant probim with the provision of services to all residential development including single family. Only after establishing the City's inability to provide adequate public services through the normal review process could a formula be established in effect creating an allotment among the various residential types (i.e. single family, apartments, condominiums, etc.). Again, Such an allotment would need to reflect a tangible relationship tetwnen unit type and its demand on specified public services. In summary, controls on the rate of growth are only possible under I growth management ordinance affecting in same way all residential housing, this alternative doesn not e appeart tend eng1thef moist appropriate tool to deal with the issue of multi -family housing. , Cl 'y COOCIL ST-Fr 'z;zT Multiple Family a —lopment August 21, 1985 Page 6 Ir 4% 34% ALTERNATIVE C. CONTROLS dN DEVELOPMENT TNROUGN UPGRADED DESIGN 6% Upgrading of current Development Standards for multiple family 475 -504 projects could affect the pace, quality, and the ultimate buildout 731 -1133 levels, depending an the extent of modifications considered. This section provides an outline of revisions to the Development sq. ft. Standards which could be consideredJ. Topics covered include: sq. ft. minimum dwelling unit sizes, open space requirements, building 493 separation, recreation amenities, architecture, parking 883 requirements, and building code provisions. With exception of the building code, all of the sections pertain to the Development sq. ft. Code. Similar amendments could be specified for the Etiwanda sq ft. Specific Plan and the Terra Vista and Victoria Planned Communities, within the limitation set forth by previous agreements. Dwelling Unit SizesNItiple Family: A sample survey qt nearly 2,000 wits - family units recently constructed and ailable for rent was conducted recently to determine the range of dwelling unit sizes, average size, and unit mix as indicated on the folloning table: C NEW MULTI - FAMILY UNITS FOR RENT UNIT SIZE AND MIX Studio 1 -8drm 2- ion _m adr No. of OU's 82 660 1093 1i2 (1947 Total) % of To ^.al Units (I.a. Niit mix) 4% 34% 55% 6% Size Range 475 -504 580 -790 731 -1133 1030 -1225 sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. Average Size 493 670 883 1176 sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq ft. The Development Coda does not establish a minimum size for multi- family units. Therefore, considering the information above, C minimum unit sizes could be established, possibly based on the number of bedrooms, if appropriate. '359 Clry CO °:C'_ S -:: .3 C;. Hultiole Family 0�_iopren: August 21, lga5 Page 1 Owellinn unit Sizes /SinOle Family. A related Item requested for Council consideration is minimum sizes for :Ingle family homes. Though this item does not directly relate to the issue of multiple family housing, It could be considered in conjunction with Size limitations On multiple family units Should the Council so desire. The Development Code currently has a 900 square foot minimum standard, unless a CUP is approved for smaller units. A survey of unit sizes approved by the City to the three single family districts (VL. L. LM) indicated the following typical ranges: LM District t 900 -1600 sq. ft. L District t 1200 -1900 sq. ft. vL District t 1800 sq. ft. 6 up An exception to this is the smallest phase of victoria, with sage 160 square foot homes built prior to the adoption of the 900 square foot minimum standard. 7Jrf The results of A phone Fontana, tl survey of the cities of Chino, Irvine, Montclair. Ontario and Upland are attached to Appendfx C Controls on minimum dwelling unit sizes vary based on local conditions and policy; they vary from rather restrictive (Upland), to no standards at all (Irvine, Chino). Though it has no minimum standards currently in effect, dwelling unit Standards. Chino is now cotdering minim New standards for minimum unit size could be established with Council's direction, either for 411 residential types, or for multiple family units only. The Omen Sauce AeOUtrernnts muitt tamtl�t Code currently requires 301 common open space for 35s common y Projects under the Basic Development Standards, and Optional pee opmentaStandards .- faInladdition, approved under the requirements (patios or balconies) range from 1501tUt225pen feet space ac ground floor units and 100 to ISO square feet for upper story units; depending on the district. increasing the open space requirements Could be considered. Additional area for open space amenities would also be provided. building areas, Would theoreticaproportional l rOstingreduction In reducedf density. In Practice, increased open space requirements would also encourage larger, higher and more massive buildings such as °stacked flats- versus townhouse style development or for more efficient ule of land. 31:�9 114 C C CITY COD7C.L TS -- -� ^a- Multiple Family 7A S icpaen: August 21, 1995 page 8 Regarding private open space, patio and balcony sizes could be adjusted. It should be noted that current standards are generous, particularly for upstairs units. Building Separation /Setbacks The Optional Development Standards elptflestablsesnominimus building for multifamy projects. The Basic Standards require 15 feet separation for side to side buildings and 30 feet separation for buildings facing front to front. A minimum standard for building separatton be on the heignt of the structure could be established for the Optignai Development Standards. The Development Code allows only one -story multi - family units within 100 feet of the LA, L, and VL Districts. This provision only affects the interior boundaries of a project. A standard cowrd be set, however, which would also require one- 14- story units along street frontages facing one -story single family development. Though not currently required by code, this approach has been used for several multiple family projects approved by the C 1 ty. Recreational Amenities Under the Optional Development Standards, a tot lot and open Yard area, plus amenities such as a pool ar tennis court are required. No specific requlremsts facilities. exist for the number of recreation A ratio could be established requiring a certain number of amenities basal on the number of units within a project. andrhandball facilities courts, exercise include ro.m, reecreationterow. totilot, and open yard area with minimsa dimensions. This would assure adequate hr tf alieth uand reduce teburden on city facilities and also Affect qalityLid types of projects built. Design Guidelines The Development Code includes guidelines for architecture of multi - family units. The design expectations for apartment structures, however, are generally less than for condominium or townhomes. The most common type of apartment architecture is stacked flats (t.e . are generally less Placed eal in identical rc ground floor units). These units (i.e. two-story bull ttslderto -side) Townha�s tare normally associated with ownership units, though this is at always the case. YU0 a7 CITY COJSC'L ST -F- -cog - wultfpie Fyefly Ck.lopment August 21, 1985 Page 9 Design requirements could be established which discourage stacked flats unless designed to high quality standards with significant variation of roof height, form, and architectural planes. Par�kinq the gevalapment Code separates apartments and townhouse /condo parking requirements. The number of parkirq spaces for apartment units Is marginally lower as shown on the chart below: CURRENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS SPACES PER UNIT artments Townhouses /Condo's Studio 1.3 1.3 1 Bedroom a 1.3 1.5 gj 2 Bedroom 1.6 1.8 3 Bedroom 1.7 2.0 4 Bedroom 1.9 2.0 Visitor 1.0 per 4 Du's 1.0 per 4 OU's The parking requirements for apartments could be adJusted. If apartment standards were identical to tl.at of townhouses and condos, this would eliminate a site planning benefit for apartments, depending on the uM t mix. Currently, one covered space in a garage or ca art is required for all m1tl- family proJe:ts. This star ar cou be changed to reSuire garages for townhouses /condos and /or apartments. Building Code Provisions The Uniform Building Code has separate requirements for attached si If units eatsy rorrolin Attached unitay be Placed sidbyide(townhomesoneove the other (stacked). To create (versus apartments) attached units lnitvldual ownership of units may be separated by property lines or •air space". Given the side by side configuration of teparated property lines uh be located between units. Units S eparated by property Imes have stringent building code requirements for fire walls, and separate services, such as sewer, water, gas and upgraded electrical capacity. 1 .0 F C CITY C09n-1L S -,Fr ;pro; Multiple Family 0 August 21, 1935 Page 10 In the casd of stacked units, property lines Cannot separate different floors, so air space 1z used to divide ownership. The Uniform Building Code does not recognize air space in its requirements, therefore, the standards are Identical whether or not units are sold individually as condos or rented as apartments. State legislation limits local amendments to the Building Code based on locattonal criteria such as climate, geology, and topography. Prior to adoption of amendments to the Uniform Building Code, upgrading any Building Code requirements, additional research would be necessary to determine if it can be legally accomplished. SUMMARY: Of all the Jevelopeent Standard revisions noted, the 7olTing appear to be tf'e most feasible: 1. Consideration of minimal dwelling unit size, by number of bedrooms. 2. One- story,byilding hatyht limits on multiple family project} along str o. frontagos facing single family /ona story housing. 3. Upgraded design requirements for *stacked flats•. C4. Modification in apartment parking requirements. y 3 y .a j 11 J ya• HultiDle Family Jay August 21. 1985 Page 11 ALTERNATIVE D. REDUCTION OF DENSITY THROUGH RECONSiDERATIOWOF THE tEXERAL P N Reductions of density in specified areas is an alternative which would limit the ultimate buildout level Of multiple family development. Such reductions may also have an effect on the rate 0f construction, through limited availability of appropriately designated land in specific areas. This section provides a description of multi- family residential Sroperty in the Medium, Medium -High, and High Residential istricts. The information is broken down into five planning areas for Alta Loma, Cucamonga, Etiwanda, Terra Vista and Victoria. The mmu Caryn Planned Conity is not included as it contains no land designated for multi -family use. The following tables outline the amount of vacant acreage by land use designation in each of the five areas. In addition, a second set of numbers is provided to account for previous Planning Commission approval of multi- family Projects; the number of acre.$. in paronthese�d maps indicate vacant or developable multiple - family land not subject to prior final City approvals (i.e. Tract Naps, Development Approvals). The intent is to provide the Council with information on vacant land designated but not yet approved for multiple family development. C'TY C,;Ji -I- S ... li 4altiple Fami'v CC .:c3-ee7 August 21, 1931 Page 12 re :•i 1-(�I:•� i VL -V1 r� -J Vr� q + L b ylr r '.1/ r •' 1 r.. 1 I J L LM LM r PC it 4 LM +� ►.�+ - '- YAA.f - r ill i I !Ili u 1 1 1 1.�(�I•�..1 4r. J Iy;. i l v .., 1 i' — al YC YM •r ' a, .r .. Y Y 11 �• '� _. 4 LM - T l LM LY 1 C. 0a _ rw _ R' '•`•, b �• ❑i'L.._.S �a,ii� r u V.P.C. 1 'Z l '.'w r �"i j A. 1 • PIC, El � r f1� •. .� �� i i11k�1 '�.•; .. .rte ''`t��. .dL.j W LI �•r.��.. ... Alta Lap Planning Area x APPROXIMATE VACANT AREAS OF MULTI- FAMILY ZONED LAND Vacant (Without Final City Approvals) Medina (8 -14 du /ac) 120 i8)) Mediun -High (14 -24 du /ac) 50 q0j Nigh (24 -30 du /ac) 0 0) ,t TOTAL ACRES It is important to note that a substantial portion of multi - family property in Alta Loma was considered far ssible land use changes the 1 severaltsit sgtalong 19thCStr.et were reduced po educed 1 density. tThestable g already reflects these reductions. Cl "Y CC9YCI- ST,- p ^,dT Multiple Family 0j.e Jop'ont August 21, 19a5 Page 13 • �,�, c� 1 Fc •mot' -, - 1 i f ,a.s.� 9 4'ti :!� M n° d ? LL. cc ac .. a 6C MH cc a M LM M Me »; J a •' Iya IUW ,4. y , � � u ■ .. mil+ i 1 ++ cc Y} o' M LM= us "` I.S. , M L _ 1 '-7 _ • .. sea w9j". — , _• AINQ •.. •n .acmes. _ J. �'`_� I rrZoln. s- �u LS .1P I; eaves "mine Cucx■cnoa Planning Area APPROXIMATE VACANT ACRES OF MULTI - FAMILY ZONED LAND Vacant (Without Final City Approvals) Medium (8 -14 du /ac) 1" 1731 Medium-Hit (14 -24 du /ac) 75 58 High (24 -30 du /ac) 0 0 TOTAL ACRES 252 118 C CITY C0: S- IF Mul:ipie Famit,, - ioa-en: Auqust 21. 1935 Paan la Ettranda PiannlM Area• APPROXIMATE VACANT ACRES OF MOLTI- FAMILY ZONED LAND Vacant (Without Final City Approvais) Medium Medium- High -24 )du /ac) 1403 ((12053 High (25 -30 du /ac) D 7 of TOTAL ACRES143 (125) The highest density permitted••in the Etiranda Specific Plan is Medium Residential (8 -p4 du /ac). t/0 6 -V CITY COJu: iTCFi -o ^q' Maltiole Firmly 0A._10p-ent August 21, 1985 Page Terra Vista Planning Area APPROXIMATE VACANT ACRES OF MULTI - FAMILY ZONED LAND Vacant (Without Final City Ppprovals) Medium 4 -14 du/ac) 224 116) Medium -High (14 -24 du /ac) 65 65 High (24 -30 du /ac) 71 71 TOTAL ACRFS360 (252) In Terra Vista, the Medium Residential category has a range of 4 to 14 units per acre versus 0 to 14. With the lower range, a i significant portion of Medium Residential property has been approved and /or constructed as single family homes. However, the overall 1 buitdout within the Planned Community remains the same by building at the higher end of the range within multi -family projects. CITY COU -ICI: SFr •spz- Multlole Family 0 eio o Went August 21, 1985 Page 16 --mot -' - --�°— - - --- i I.a,r Victoria Plannine Area APPROXIMATE VACANT ACRES OF IVLTI- FAMILY ZONED LAND Vacant (Without Final City Approvals) Medium (4_14 du /ac) 251 251 Medium -High (14 -24 du /ac) 17.5 125 High (24-30 eu /ac) 52 52 TOTAL ACRES428 (428) H Development in the Victors. 'tanned Community has occurred in the ' Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) and Low - Medium Residential (4-8 du /ac) categories. As of this date, no multi - family projects have received r,l Epp roval. ~� sy, •includes approximately 73 acres not within Planned Community ^� Boundaries VD 8 CI -Y C%1:!! STAFr -7,7= C Multiple Fanily 3t)�e1tpme .1t August 21, 19Ss Page 17 The preceding information focuses on multiple family designated land not yet conalted to development through tentative map or similar approvals. It should be noted that in the Planned Community areas, i.e. Terra Vista and Victoria, the City has made previous binding ag relative to ultimate level of development through bfndtng agreements. The City's ability to modify previously restricted. i Planned i trictel.However,st staff Couldre -exam re-examine M. mmeYand lH land use designations in the Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etlwanda areas if so directed by the City Council. IV. SUMMIARY OF AVAILABILE ALTERNATIVES: Each of thr alternatives outlined In t s report responds to a slightly different set of problems and may be used individually or in conjunction with other solutions. Though by no means complete, the summary below is intended to provi.e a format for discussion. Host of other options can of course be added if desired. The options for consideration include the following: T3 A. Formalize ty policy on multiple fa2ily financing through: 1. Elimination of future multiple family bonds; or 2. Limitation of such bonds to specified circumstances; or 0. Consider a new growt'i management policy which may affect in a_v some w 111 resident.al development; or C. Consider modificatior to existing development standards, with Possible focus on mit'imum dwelling sizes, parking and other provisions; or 0. Consider modifications to the Land Use Element of the General Plan in specified planning areas or City -wide. V. RECOMMENDATIONS: It Is recommended that the Council review the n ormat on presented in this report and provide slat! with 'apyrppriate direction. Otto Krou Senior P n OK:jr Attachments X09 (, 17Y OF RAi iCNO CUCA610tir, _I.. d jal. "44017Y CEYELOPMERt OEP, JUL 2 G 1985 PR `1v191WIYI121114tu14�st6 NVNLLN ONL CNIC CC.". G.CIC M.. L• I........ IOUR?. 1100. •NO.CN V AOCLVN.NI -0 LO. ms, .1lIY O. NIN LON e. (.V C.IIIO.NI.I •a.aa .IO L. O C..10 .0. ITM .CO.00OI Y..VN. JO OCICIC. VRL..IONL� mn ol•a.0 MEMORANDUM TD: Jack Lam, Community Development Director, City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: James L. Markman, City Attorney DATED: July 25, 1985 RE: Critoria for imposition of growth management control on housing in Rancho Cucamonga • This m ry request for input onathe possibility ofecontolling apartment build -outs as compared to single family build -outs through a spare statutory tat.thority forAa growth management,ordinancee- is stated in California Government Code Section 65863.6, a copy of which is attached to this memorandum. The section states that any ordinance limiting the number of housing units which may be constructed annually must contain find- ings As to the public health, safety and welfare items which are promoted by the adoption of such an ordinance which in turn justifies reducing housing opportunities in the region as beeniAdopted clear ratios v. Citchof Camarillo (1983), 149 Cal. App. am attac xng a spy of that case for your consideration. The case really turns on procedural questions raised by a particular developer who was denied a housing allotment durin7 calendar year 1982. Tho pertinence of the case to this memorandum is the fact that St describes one of the most comprehensive growth management ordinances in the state and validates the criteria for adooting the ordinance and the different criteria to be considered by the city council within the ordinance in making housing allotments. The basis for limiting the nupumber of residential thetCamarillo case bwasesta stated anrecitaleinathedGrowthrCon- trol Law an is found in Footnote 2 on page 172 of the case. L Y'1D 37 Memorandum Lam Page 25, 19 to Jac Page 2 The rather crucial recital in question States as follows: =abldVetaiSteady, rather the people of the cSeY to rapid, rate of residential a fluctuatin that the services growth each r overly ut111ty and /or service agenciesioy, school. park, der city can be ice a _ manner w Properly and effectiope operating in the and i which will not overextend existing in a n order that deficient services g e brouties, up tog =byimeananofnlonasary standardsawhilabmiught mizln able coats of shoOf lOnhtednlucllitnin 1n1- 4. the Avoid- If • Y expansion.' :avernmsntlCode'§ a into cons -iz in to action 65863.6 -and the provisions of managementaordinan fo Md the above - quoted recital Ordinance, !t becomes clear that n growth housing infrastructure so as not ended upon a need to make Public infrastructure facilities Overtax Public me and sewer llteaa Accordingly ea suchman rvicesland ing whether ly sec A , it s==eats, avatar order apply such y v d" that in consider- dwel.ii buildcouts, Z ct m ldaouts Witha�nSlesfaammOn mechanism in 4a In fdcilitded upon ar. inability a be ° factual basis Y needs through y LO meet Public service for doing dartly,�natt -�e regal"! we have found notauthoritea O Iaci- gr °wth g nt ordira create a balance betweennewhich does y for Y dwellin build -outa apartment build- Outyg�arai than growastruc g Gotdcontrollordln There service must an over-all lthPublic eh mans justifying once as a whole. If a situation exists in Rancho Cucamonga !ng a growth mcaseement ordinance on the abo _ the Camarillo 11ah ni q trpecificgcrn becomes useful as evsource stated basi, Poses is balanced againsteanother�'sitn One eatp=o- ments in receive h er a of the waterisen Year. Those criteria Include housin allot- 11 to serve the the capacitye P°Sed. the capacity of the achoolaato absarydevela in children generated b development pro - particular develo m Y that development anY pncrdase P ant on to sewer s • to Impact of the Yatem, to fire department, C: C C tiemranium to .lack Lam July 25, ]S85 Page 3 the street system and any arterial highuny system ani storm drainage considarltio s. Of course, those crdterds analyze potential n5gative Impacts of a development. Other criteria to be takn Into misidersticn in a more positiva vain include tho harmony of the proposed architectural design of a proposed development with neighboring development, the provision or extension of Mice trails, equestrian trails green tales and virtually all other aaathetic and compatibility f"'Ums. WAt importantly, for the purposes of Lila memorandum. the Zimartilo case also establdahe3 the fact that the type of residential unitt'�er consideration in each development proposal may be considered. I believe that if wo reach that point in impIt m sting a growth mvugsmnt ordinance, the City Council could take into considention in allotSSrrXL�bbyy�hildable musing units the type of units to be built; thst is, whoth7rthose units constitute single family dwellings p s_o c artmants. 7ha analysis in question as to each doveloemnt pransal could take Into cami.leratleh as ons of numerous C factors rxetving numerical allocations, the different types of housing nhels 3xistdn3 Li the community and those which arc being met to a grettar 4egras than otters. Thus, if there 13 a hoed for single family dwellings for persons working In and about the ocununity and the region to a greater dsgres than apartment units Weida may be ahead in the build -ait phase, it is possible that the 000acdl cold decide to allow points to single family dwellings in its cvuidaratio o! all relevant !actors. Again, I out caution that in order to reach that point in iaflemntLn a growth management ordinance, it is _first necessary that the Council ma:ce a broad policy decision that such an ordinance %hide in affect Limits the mbar of built outs during a year by gmmrnmental action is necsssaty to to sure that infrastructure and public service needs may 'oo mat it may well be that the Cxancil will decide that thmxngh otlur legal devices available, Rondo Cucamonga already is able to meet public service and infrastructure needs geerate3 bf housL-g build-cuts. I hhopse .hat this rmorvdum Ind the attached wNorittas ar3 useful to you in wovt.1inj o?tioms for action by the City Council on this subject matter. Ji.'4: n j'c F3hc1. X_ .IV r r � • _ .M_ STAFF TELEPHONE SURVEY. August 15, 1985 4 `• , cir MINIMUM DOLING LING UBIT SIZES CHINO No Standards . Possible new standards now being considered. IRVINE No Standards - Just use UBC FONTANA Dwelling Unit Size Based on Zoning as Follows: !--I Minimum Lot Size 7,200 sq. ft. - all R1 Zones A11 Single Family Units R -1 -C 1,100 sq. ft. R -1 -0 1,200 sq. ft. R -1 -E 1,300 sq. ft. R -1 -F 1,400 sq. ft. 850 sq. ft. if single family detached 's 650 sq. ft, if multi -Rally R_3 850 sq. ft, if single family detached 500 sq. ft. if multi -family HONTCLAIR' Minimum Size Based on Dwelling Unit Type as Follows: (a) Single Family Dotached Units: .42 bdrms - 1,300 sq. ft. 3 bdrms or mom - 1,40;, sq. ft (b) Multi- Family Units (Apt. L Condo) 1 bdm 950 sq. ft. 2 bdrms 1,200 sq. ft. 3 bdrms 1,400 sq. ft. 4 bdrms 1,450 sq. ft. * Hintru m Room Al dwelling Size of 110 sq. ft. units require 2 -car garage, no carparts ONTARIO No Standards 4 `• ■ N UPLAND ?gelling Unit Size Standards as Follows: ZONE HIM. LOT AREA MIN. O/U SIZE sq. t' sQ' Slnole Famil Zones R -S -15 20,000 15,000 2,000 1,800 R -S -10 10,000 1,600 R -S -1.5 7,500 1,400 R -S -6 6,000 900 Multi- Famtlr Zones R -M-4.4 R- M- 3.6(c) R -M -3.6 R -H -2.0 R -H -1.5 S eciai 30,000 30,000 15,000 16,000 7,500 Q 1,000 /du 1,000 /du 1,000 /du 1,000 /du 500 - Bachelor 700 - 1 Bdrm 807 - 2 Bdrm 1,000 - 3 8drm 1,000 s0• ft. for a 1 Bedroom plus 200 sq. ft. for additional Bedroom Clay Collett h loot.. Ltw.t 7, I9U f4, 7 Jut* Yarkr,, City At.nney, mated that ntnc. LAl,n over the property, t6, yern.ci4 rand bare to pr "Ldn ter -that typo swurlty ... b Y1 nth or bead, ]err frost , City heuvrer. talc C ".ell tb "ld pe "e and look at the arts betero roil*, • aaebloa. There being 90 forth* labile "mime, Yt1er Y14b <146ed et.. swblle burly. Coam lira Othl felt [are Oeral opr't Code Latest v8, to a11" Iff"It °re otu tot Lb* td"" eSar.t eatrldert• bat at retail "tints, h.a Christ". tare 9rw@ts enwld been to csrt.t chair team aft-site. 4 ran, "total +earn, be, dlat oat recall -type e.g. is the ore. uphold the 4r!- Ceaer VC, t.. t rested that If .s all" tar "a to tor• Christ ", tr46, la the ""ruts thas then r "Id be leer arm owl mall ulu LAO1rM. C"•cllra Lgnt felt Count" should art give ...atdent/aa to aattb/4 Ls that ace that doesn't e,afeU alth the pmt "Ry o /prwtd policy 1. affect. 4 dL not base • )"blan .Lth ,,..out "toll 86146• bat did at rest to rm '"a" In t° end eat +p a [mile r ter matt "nary " • location area- th bell •gnlred th" t!• .tl. /ty nnrat at • rodvcad cart. ?his eh "Id be kept L" Urteal ton, me any. Player Sit'" 'toted that then v86 a nhtasctal CUUt of Ind wathas utility cUrLdcre alibi, the City. No Lilt C ".e Ll boa to b• e,,.t,l .et to oiler e /eawdL,e enables chago policy fn each o little sweet at •and. Tiprv°Itcy ..uti !. vboth" to •tlw for"' tv do 10 ULS" Corridors, 4 tb. be R• of an, �yolary, he r"ld prnfn a partial dWe. p"TIat Y"ed y Ig..t, "-a"" y Clip to deny the •pp.,, and aph.ld Ito (leasing Cowdletw. 4cw"` Yota. "'It" oruLlwriy 3-0. e+e.e• 66. ur n tai c Rrt. o ppt t i Arrblb•U A.s "Lae react IS]I7, ! "@tN a `anal at rev. oI the g "than fee ttla 4Uroad b,to,m 4enlb.ld sod " the ,Utb aide t_d by Connell"• D.hl. (0701 -06 bUS" I&M.a. peer. prr..r Cmacllr. Dall preuet*d the me policy tars prmaarsties that •h "arvr p le to °„ r it tble 4 to (1) Iowa m of aLtnla the hell hin the m r+"tn the d "al of 0 to tr1, led ,ado of the Lwr in46t:oo within Unit pr°Jwt ."0 tar of Can. I. rot be legal". is this appeal. lea au. an healthy. U the t. m 'te. 4 felt Ctawll esh "ld S"' It a "llry that tUS. arrgall to "r orsat &n t° the fla "lap Coaafeloa. (L) It" Cities" hale a 'p,mla tan dare /e!" that has lot bar . pablte hearia&, than a 9soklu •lea • ,tact the Cm "tl .band be paid fn y the City w act by the citizens• U "![ware to 13ts tpookSeecthis burl a4" the° It .hand ha slid tar by the appllesee. 4 vCold decision. possible recommended sat L --y 044e and breast back for "IT Riga" ."S" I" '*tied for peblie heart*,. Add .... I,, CoIULI vent Imes A" 4h, 9910 4 ph. Street. urns the @treat Eros clear daraloD- rat. The fret noosed Inied,d a cypress. pnl� sad • post. U !t Sad bus looked at etr't. Darhapr char Inn a "Id here been pogo.. Gredl4 has fen do" with ditc piled aroud the tarok of the the r that it .111 prad.bly hill the [are. Thy took "t a whole vind rear, her Drag. 1en they an,d keep the fen trots. I. they wart to rune those alas. pis . "ld Ilk+ to eao tart term retal.ed• 1.00 polls, rotor Iare aed d•m.apsr at th sits. Stated that carer Droe- Led aeyeu that they solid • "a the Lest Urinl4 trots an es, _ City Count ll F.vvtu fuavat 7. L983 Na. a property. Flan the went at the proposed dasalopa.ut. they verl- MI.d IF twpiq tbs trot. b felt this could hue been .rotd.d had the I, bas, 04dro.N rt U0 ties the wotatbe rD ra .pprwN. Ra treat do pt,swe •safer) Lose sod ehwld be truth eo .acts pr, dldea qtly, the atbarint and we he !u food of bUu 8.6 a ubptus ft, ". 41004 that In this case the wwlypt.. true. at veld not be ICI, tad they " to" not to ltm th Trrriq u. rap L.Jvriou. a.d Creole. on the Lang tan sore atop it $too Lt felt.... If the 0.17 vey to keep the ... "Say. d Le to top !f, too Ise theuld one ILd of Lt. The eucalnawe ere ray, ditty. and Iith nt/at,aaaf.. She reol loos 1, but such La It [olng to test to k*ap the tne. There blue pea at, peaty healthy although chew .t, •let of 0198e v9.4 vLtb Chan, M Could lire et, o[ Chu about tea year. before the no r!n part, of the tap -"to Cut sa utter that you do to !t. It 7t, t Look the Cneo, aka tope till base to be topped .rely to pro[rt Iron Clod beaak,s a04 frog dane r hoorah drop $I p* ties the tree is trig" @tough to alfalns to risk. you here .past the r.or tap balance to the point that yen at. [.!q to base an .n.raue0 roab of eat [rev U. Thee branches Stan rapLdl7, are weakly attached, 0rtitl., aN pC.geot • higher tI" break,* beoard thus vb.t in there et,. Sou loo Lo a e us 22 elteo 7t, sots to tree .a Lt i. eof. et,. but yes guarantee Lt r10•t asp Orion; ate. lases ►rest. Clp Treoast@to r"mounted a pbss d replacerst of tea true. Lev [krlws. Not Nerhobi , that* four true wed to be Oar. to goes Pals pod pagrat,. !hey hasn't bass nn $Lace the start!, at thaXkaaaad U vs. Thin kasl, • direct lapatt on the eeslroeesv[. y ta T4- out• d true.. v0 -ill be .ffectiq rest vlld lit* o base in tbL. eaeo. Seas $halt.. legs Addeo ►.n good. .rated Chet butt In ].sup can denlewr Rant" that be vr]d Lest the !ear tom although he dN1N It this ev"I t There being no further public response, Kayor NUel. eleged the public hearing. Coastlloeo Toot Rated that the'* tom are 0atrerly attrart Lve, but rk.t he he. just beard for the arberi0t. 0* was sot In a politics to a,a.. q did .et vest to eau sywe tn)er.d because of a tree white has a Iife of too to ILit." lean bees].* of root Logo, ►y that reason. he vould base to al lea the aware at of the gnu. Net be rgveotrd that the twee be toplacN a scat. ed it our ordinance' With that h* 04thdrw the yred. dC2IM, Cou"Lln*a Dahl, ypeLI"to withdraw the appeal. Keyes *I' its .toted that tie test ardlw.ce in thing through rn/gl@te use a. a rush at action of a aaspl* of booths ,e to /worpor,g the egpusse that r0* toes fast It ►oral[ be ands a Part of the tentative trust bar pestus be- two eey grodLry takes plus. Thin will be Considered rep shortly thus t* cent. to CeueLl. player N!k*b 8110 g gardi.g appeals et awtb@t settled. uggastM that Council tale. the inwe ra- U]) tt. ur..c ti [Den oPa s N art! 1111 al 11 1111111111 Conalulw • teed ill. et a..rasal tea peo LNO Appeal !or SPabHea Trust 12333, a estpplieatint !ant Lslta m!n at slur Ractltst- fvral abWus to the .plowed al stations a" aiding at, at, alar.ttea tar 102 sue let line sod 9 sale faall, .eta on 14.3 acre. of land In the Les Radius U-8 dn/sa) Oiatrlct. :—".ft at !bate Vista street, .ad o.. - b.10n Archibald brew taro bo dspl 207 - 181-03, 0f, 1bottom ArchibArchibald , 16. 6$04! report by banes Iang, 4atstat sleesor. (07C1 -0f d►!Li) city Conrll Minute. ,ugot 7. 1987 ped• 9 player Met,'renW to rating for pablle hearing. Addrentl g Council wru ddady page" ?'car govt', anted that at the ter the tast[be U, vu Y•xtW. they poumd Stave with It tar floor pen" eea of velth vu the tall. Sto" ,1,, paring the Conroe of the tdntatt• up prouasata,, fit o �be let# they rot dldsoW teen the dn•lot".t boa.., It didn't the thnr rmi.l 'lltt trapnlvg. The tytathS .1 vat •IIrnW with dodo AS eq peen[. /9e. they r.v/oud the total 'tap• of the een[. they da[SrWeed they aWW t fart floor Ilse to fill a gap eanm .toe ycW larta.c and the lard" ' plan vhlch [bey deigned in cenfere'e s with the dvaigd Crlttis white had been eatebtlobW en the eth- or [try plan. 'ha plan vas appraed in dealt, min with no Call- ,1ens. 0 it rang to tee notated Coval"Ln, It wan gprm vet the ad condition that the nofttg "'trial be changed free a.pbla to concrete tile fn the antic. tract [n<e den Cube, 9910 G fine, All'be bow, "Jaeger to thin eoalor"er hoe tilt reefs. Kro. Sbrlet. Had t•rbblrt. stotW that the roofs Coca plant• riot up m obiedle, her free there n tt y are all teal•. rbere being to further public r-opnne, Kq= va.ls dead attic ["ring. Mayor pUtlt lroeftry "trial tree [hale ti" this project Va. floor policy Cni Ad the it" they Ca" back for ardent. to tanerpoat• the am deal&.. 7a�paey •T t teat b no different f[n the .leatim when a trstt "p i.-g1nk 1e.tati pptnel sd eod/ftaatlole are .Msbt roe year. ter after the Do. "101 "et C444 bas been cbaagAc. Iles the reOSeetW change te"a tbrougha then the whole pteJ "t rot be brought a9 to the StadtW in eeteoae, Corcileee Squat stated ayoae tedatt tbraab would b.ea to "et the .e { <o.- dltt0na. An roatW there.ald be .. ddpioasl cot /tcvrrWo but tea it . Uttering t,r ee.." the e" product want bane a hither grkst ability as for 11 the "Watt. "1101 Knd by Debt, nnd.d y Cied to do" the .,pool W uphold the 71Ualed Caanl.tlan's doetla. Kecia' Carried eedal "atq 7.0. •.•ea tlyor Klkds called . rata.@ at 10[10 p... She "Acted raonead at 10110 "A' vItb CeaccileUh.ro Ioltbtt Metes ad King pratd.t) ••net• q. a ♦en 1.0lI1 - 4 a "We"t to t. Dmtopre[ pica row toe yeast 1-D (N) City to cba.pp the 1W ..• dulttatieas i, the .atbeao fat, dta "W Co.. heglcal W Bind ceeryi.l. office end er.ed.W.l etu tt�tf tar'ncld• , grace Cook. Aa.att timer. (010] -07 rLaltdm coWlirT) art by Meyer Mele egad the Nettled tar public haattd. Addrtr.ied Canit cat. Key K.tlak, Long, b"', "tared Ceceeit'. ,upend. There brtog eat further public ru,eerea K",r Ciket clUW the public bet and. City Clark Authnlet red the title of Behove ga. 170, -�O. OP-/ I.... L N•.. Y•N •ND.CW V w.0 2.n0.1 RALPH O ...So. D C.w10 10. N.. M. •o onlLCn Lauren Wasserman City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NYNLLR CNC CIVIL CLNTCN CIA LL 'OMIT. 1100. 1 o Lo. Iocr 0.CkCAL110RM4 9:OiC -1060 nMI ILO'CY OI TLLCIMONL win cY1 as1. March 20, 1986 Re: Entertainment Permit Ordinance :s Dear Lauren: 33''__ Pursuant to recent direction from the City Council, we have prepared a comprehe,.sive ordinance, the adoption of which would establish a permit process for businesses desiring to offer live entertainment, as defined, within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. You will note that this ordinance is in draft form. Accordingly, we anticipate that its provisions will be discussed and perhaps mLdified, assuming such an ordinance is still desired. Briefly, the ordinance would require all businesses not heretofore offering live entertainment to file an applica- tion with your office which would become the basis of a preliminary investigation of the applicant. Businesses already offering live entertainment would have a grace period within which to apply and satisfy the criteria in the proposed ordinance. notably, the proposed ordinance would require that a public hearing before the City Council be conducted, prior to the issuance of any entertainment permits. Based upon criteria set forth in the proposed ordinance, the City Council may approve, conditionally approve or deny applications. Based upon evidence presented at the public hearing, the Council may impose conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance and /or throughout the term of the permit. The proposed ordinance sets forth a fee of $75.00 payable annually upon renewal. Additionally, the proposed ordinance imposes a requirement thata unifonnad security guard be present at businesses where dancing by the public is permitted and where the available dance floor area is in ((/g Im Lauren Wasserman March 20, 1986 Page Two excess of 150 feet, during the time such dancing is permitted. Finally, violations of the proposed ordinance are deemed to be infractions, punishable by a fine. Feel free to contact this office in order to discuss your concerns or any other aspect of the proposed ordinance at greatar length, should you so choose. Very t my yours 15-IF -xs D. Craig ox Deputy Clt} ntt rney OCF :ljl City of Ranc camonga Encl. erg ORDINANCE NO. Z) 9 0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING YALE 5 OF SHE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE E1 ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 5.12 ENTI7LED "REGULATION OF RNTERTAINMIET." THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITr OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES OFDAIN AS FOLLOWS, SECTION is Title 5 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cude is hereby mended by the addition of a am Chapter 5.12 to read, in words and figures, as follows "Chanter 5,12 "BegnLNoe of Eetertaiemaet - sectioitt 1011 ?3 5.12.010 permit required. 5.12.020 Entertainment defined. 5.12.050 Exclusions. 5.12.040 Application for permit. 5.12.050 Iovestigation sal hearing. 5.12.060 Notice of hearing. 5.12.070 Action of hearing. 5.12.080 Denial of application. 5.12.090 Conditions impreed on permit. 5.12.100 Suspension or revocation of permit. 5.12.110 Pees. 5.12.120 Time for filing application. 5.12.150 Security guard required at dancos. 5.12.140 Chapter to govern. 5.12.150 Probibition and penalties. 5.12.160 Civil remedies available. "s,ij,Hlp perils re Ngj=gQ, No person or business entity shall operate, conduct, or manage any place or promises open to the public where food or beverages are sold, offered for sale, or given away, and where any form of entertainment, as defined harela, is provided or furnished without first obtainieg a permit so to do as hereinafter provided for in this chapter. "1 ".1120�Rjy tale .m —tee ,��Ei�?ed, Entertainment mum every form of live eetwrta. to Mole. band or orchestra, act, play, burlesque show, fashion eLva, .No putos._,,, acme, most or deuce, act or song, and duce act, or any other .ct or performance participated in by one or more persons for the purpose of holding the attention of. Raining the attention mad interest of, diverting or amusing guests or patrons. I/Do "1 .12.0'0 al, 1 • { . She provis{ons of this chapter shall not be domed to require a permit'tor the following: "(1) For the use of a radio or other alectronical playback device in any establishment, except when utilized by an announcer or 'disc jockey' who at any time provides any fora of vocal entertainment, including the annwnciag of song title, or artists' ones in conjunction tbarwith. "(2) For soy entertainment provided for members and their SAWS at a private club where admission is not open to the public; "(3) For entertainment coaucted in connection with a regularly established motion picture theatre, recreacloo park, circus, or fairgrouac; "(4) For entertainment conducted by or sponsored by any boom fide club, society or association, organised or incorporated for beneveleat, charitable, dramatic or literary purposes,having an established membership. and which holds aeotings at regular intervals of not lose them once per three mouth period, when proceeds, if says arising from such entertainment are used for the purpose of each club, society or association; "(S) For ssNrtaiameat provided solely by a piano player a harpist playing music for the amoserat of guests or patron, of an wotablLbrnt; "(6) For entertainment conducted solely on or at any preniae or location which is owned or operated by, or leased by, to or from the United Staten, State of California, Canary of San Bernardino, or soy agency or subdivision thereof. "5.12.040 Anoi{eae{nn "ar " "'s "* Applicants for entertainment permits shall file a written, signed sad verified application with the city manager, or his designee shewicai "(1) The name and permanent address of applicant; "(2) She case, proposed and current, if any, business address of the applicant. If the applicant is a ccrpuratioa, the acme shall be exactly as sat forth in its articles of incorporation and the applicant •ball show the car and residence address of each of the officers, directors, and each stockholder Owning not less than twenty —live percent of the stock of the corporation. If the applicant is a partnership, the application abal. show the aars and residence addresses Of each of the members, including line!red partners; 0(3) A detailed description of the proposed sntertainaant, including type of entertaicaent, number of persons engaged in the eate.taina at, and any further information about the antextainrat or entertainers, as the city administrator may deem necessary; "(4) The data, bwrs amd location whore the antertaimaeat is proposed to be conducted, sad the adsission foe, if any, to be charged: y-c4/ "(.;) The came or names of the person or persons responsible for tho muagoesat or supervision of applicant's business and of any satertainneit; "(6) A statemaut of the nature and character of applicant's business, if any, to be carried on in conjunction with each entertainment, including whether or cot alrobol will be served so part of each business{ "(y) Nhethes or not the applieaat ae any porsaa ez persona racponsible for the managemeat or srperviaion of applicant'& business have base, within the predous ten years, eanvicted of a crime, the nature of such offense, and the sentence received therefor including conditions of parole or probation, if say. "(S) Whether or not applicant hat ever bad any permit or license issued in eonjune:f.00 with the sale of alcohol or provision of entertainaent revoked, zncluddng the dete thereof and news of the revoking agency; "(9) Such other reasonable information to the city meager, or designee, my dace necessary. "5.12.050 1nvevSO&ation Uj hearing. Aft" the •pplicatioa for aS }" entertainment permit has been filed, the city manager shall cause an investigation to be mdo of such application, Pod after such investigation has been completed be shall cause the applicatioo to be sat for beariug before tha city council and shall notify the applicant of the date of cucb bearing. "5.12.060 Notice of heart,,. After the City aaaager has Bat the application for bearing, he shall cause notice of the hearing ko be given to all property meets within three hundred feot of the proposed or actual location of + the applicant's business. ror the purposes of thin section, notice to property owners #ball be sufficient if give* to those property owners who appear an such an the last equalized asseesmnt roll on file with the city. Additionally, the city manager shall cams a public uotic" to be posted at the location where the business or mterceiamut is to be conducted. All notice pcmidod for in this section shall be in the form red moner as prescribed by the city monger. The applicant shall bear all costs and "pauses in selling, printing, pahliabing and posting such noticm :mid ,ball pay such costs to the city prior to the time amt for public bearing on the pending application. Failure to pay such costs by the applicant shall be grounds to deny big application. "5.12.070 Action at hear(".. At the time and place Bat for public hearing as to say application, the city council shell hear and determine 411 the facto and evideuce relavaat to the applicant and supervisory employees, as veil or the entertainment proposed, including, the mature and location of the proposed entertainment �f �J "3.12.061: Denial of sggijggU=. At the conclusion of the hearing before the city council, the city council shall grant, conditionally grant, or deny the application. She city council my deny said application if it shall find and determine any of the following: "(1) She conduct of the establishment of the granting of the application would be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare; or "(2) The premises or establishment is likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly meener; or "(3) She applicant or any other parson associated with him as principal or partner, or in a romLtiom or capacity involving partial or total control mar the conduct of the business for which such permit is sought to be Issued, has been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any Offense involving the preaentatioa, exhibition or performance of any obscene show of any kind, or of a funny or of any crime involving moral turpitude, or has had any approval, permit or license issued to conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years; or T "(4) TL• rantiox the application would create a pobliej _ nuisance, or "(3) That the normal operation of the premises would interfere with the peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neigboorbood. "(6) That applicant has made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of materiel fact in the required application. - 3,17090 Conditions Imposed on pert. After the public hearing as to any application, the city council in granting any permit may also impose such reasonable conditions as to the use or "teat of such peraut so it dean appropriate. "3.12.100 eespee ri en pr revotsrien of pored . After notice and hearing, the city council may suspend or revoke any permit granted pursuant to this chapter if the city council finds and determines that any permitteas his agent or employee, or any person connected or associated with the permittee as partner, directors officer, general manager, or other person who is exercising managerial authority of, or on behalf of the permittee, or guy entertainers acting under the authority of such permits "(1) Made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of a material fact in the application for permit, or any report or record required to be filed pursuant to this chapter; or "(2) Violated any provision of this chapters or of any statutes ordinances or condition relating to him permitted activity; or "(3) Ia convicted of a felony, or of any crime involving moral turpitude•, or "(4) Violated any rules, regulations or condition■ adopted by the city council relating to the persittei s business or peralt; or "(S) Conducted a permitted business in a mount contrary to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the public; or "(6) Demonstrated that behbe is unfit to be treated with the privileges granted by such a parmit. "5.12.110 ream. Me fat for an entertainment pesmit shall be seventy -fLv* dollars, payable annually on or before January lot of each and every year. Bach pardt shall be in addition to any business license fee as my be required by the business license law of the city. Bouwer, for the year 1986, the fee for an entertainment permit shall be the sum of forty dollars payable on or before July 1, 1986. "5.12.120 y {mm far fil{wm ggpl{em[{on. All persona who rill be presently required to file 41r,and obtain an entertainment permit by reason of _ the provisions of this chaptdF @hall have to and including June 1, 1986 vitbin_ which to file their applications for an entertainment permit with the city manager. "5,12.110 �rpmri reap{r.d at dances. All persona conducting a public dance or any entertainment where dancing by patrons or customers is permitted, shall at all times have in attendance at On premisec for the purpose of supervieiog the dancing and the conduct of all patrons and customers, a duly licensed and uniformed security guard at all time such dancing is permitted or allowed, grower, the provisions of this section shall apply only to those establiabmeote or premiue where a dance floor or danoa area in excess of one hundred fifty squat* feet is available or designated for dit .. ig by customers or patrons. "5.12.140 Chapter row Severn. All provisions of this title which are ...consistent with sr contrary to the provisions of this chapter are hereby repealed to the extant such provisions are inconsistent with or eoatrary, to the provisions of this chapter. "5.12.150 Ptah {hi [{ee and eae tLgimL. (1) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this chapter. Any person. firs, partnership, or corporation violating guy provision of this chapter or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of an infraction and upon conviction Hereof shall be punishable as follows: "(a) A fine not exceeding One ® wired Doll.r. (5100.00) for a first viPlatiou; `/'C )L "(b) A fine not seeeediag Two B,pdrad Duller. 0200.00) fns: a second violation of the same ordinance within one year; "(c) A fine not exceeding Piv Evaared Duller, (4500.00) for each additional violation of the same ordinance within use year. "Each such perso*, firm, partnership, or corporatiou sball be deemed guilty of a saparate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof luring which any violation of say of the provisions of this cbspter is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership, or corporation, and shall be deemed punisbable therefore as provided in this chapter. "the provisions of this Chapter .hall not be construed as permitting conduct not prescribed herein and shall not affect the enforceability of any other applicable provisions of law. - 3,U.160 Civil r ..die .vall •7w. A violation Of any of the provisions of this chapter shall constitute a nuisance and say be abated by the City tbrougb civil proceso by grans of restraiming order, preliminary or permanent injunction or 4,?.,aaay other manor provided by In for the abatemeaer of such nuisance." ' 3 SECIIa r, the City Coone'l declare& that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this chapter be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any Promptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentencess and words of this chapter *ball remain in fall force and effect. SECTION 1: the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. SECTlON A, the Mayor shall sign this ardinance and the City Clark shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Reach* Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED. and ADOPTED this a day of e, 19e. AYES: SOESi AMMI: W)5- Jaffrey King, Mayor CITY OF FANCHG CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 7, 1986 TO: City Manager and City Council FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT. Addition of Chapter 8.18 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code concerning Commercial and Industrial Refuse Collection The proposed odditron to the Municipal Cade establishes criteria for The City to Issue permits to comme•clal and Industrial refuse collectlon services. An ability to Issue these permits v=ld allow the City an opportunity to Insure commercial and Industrial refuse service would be conducted in safe, sanitary and orderly manner. This would be achieved by the City having spific requirements pertaining to liability Insurance, faithful performance bards, Indemnification and exemption from liability, compliance with laws, speclficatlors and restrictions on collection trucks, direction to where refuse would be dlspo: -d, hours of operation, and final approval of any rate adjustments. Moreover, it provides the City o clear palh for recourse when a collector Is not providing an acceptrble level of service. The necessity for such an addition to the Municipal Code Is twofold. First, Rancho Cucamonga is currently operating under the County Code approved In 1974 a-d adopted by reference by the City in 1978. Since then, the County has revised the tole to meet current Industry standard for the collection and disposal of refuse. Second, the County Code is developed to meet the wide variety of refux collection and disposal needs within the entire county, taking into account the terrain and climate differences throughout the area. Rancho Cucamonga§ ordinance is developed to address the specific needs and requirements of our community. RECOMMENDATION It Is recommended City Council approve first reading of this ordinance adding Chapter 8.18 to the Municipal Code and set second reading for May 21, 1986. Respectfully submitted, Assistantk�ger RARank yap O013"cl 90. j i / Y • Omumcs at TH CITT C=Cv Ot Tar CITT Cy WCRO COCd10•CL. CLL1rC0U. LDDae C "RR 8.16 t0 Tl9 WC00 0CLI4Orf1 mdICIPLL CODI CONUMING COMMCILL YD DWIT ILL 111019 COLUCTIm it hereby is ordained by the Cea.Cil of the City of "echo careaaal. .o fellwn lrrnm le chapter 9.19 betty is added to the "acts Caa..nga Ita.icl Pal Cole to red a. fellwu 'Chapter 9.19 • u nbOr ylL "rrvPt cru"erta 8a<u ... , 8.11.010 Legislative Pally. 8.18.020 Ddtoltlena. 6.18.070 L.tberly of C.aWI to'save Parades for C.12 -Lies sad disposal. 8.18.040 htsta i for rata., eoltostlaa alai ,t bti.bm.t of collaetlo. fees. 6.18.010 Weefol cell.ctiea. 8.181060 Ca1�Ne lone is . "r9eeei.s. T 8.19.070 heuvof collection. ohs 8.18.060 "tuo eolle@tieo— tµ1189" 8.11.010 "dote Leoptaelea. 8.18.100 Ile@. "st of ret.ptaalu far Countries. 8.19.110 "fee. texte.l. 6.16.120 tofu., di.pe..l. 9.18.110 spe@t.1 IenvAlens regarding •etbed of dtaP...te 6.18.140 Wed"- -get*- 8.19.130 Berlin&. b.rial as deaptog. 9.11.160 O.ntiea of .terede• 9.111.170 "e of tneia. 8.19.110 to Paretng of tofu. make one .y sly .treat. 8118.190 1411pu of 1"eird. 8.18.200 1P.elfit.tinaa ae4 ...trtctleoe as Coll" ties sneer. 6.19.210 Trace ino9CCtlon. 8.U.220 P.ralttee. Iocel telephone..&or. 0.14.130 C~rcid red iadutriel rofw "ll.etlas are.,. 8.11.240 Pe@dttWl.geye@e. 8.11,230 hrelt far anal of nh.o— herNdaitts. 8.18.260 Permit Prnlaiou. 1.18.210 "iglu .1 onOtiM taltutet.. 8.16.290 Charge• for e."ic.. 8.18.290 9msabiliy. • In t i t el.. relic.. Us sly Oauell of the City of "sees Cac.renP desa ►.rent tied led deterd" that oterme. "C.aatation, coliectiaa and die Pae.l of refua. Pub rubbish...It& vast.. debris .ed ether diac.rdd notarial is a "etas of great public eeKM. in that ie@reper control of .soh "tuts create@ a Polito sofsaaco. Walsh nap Led to air pellet's.. feu b.n,dea illegal damping. West btsedlng .ed tat l.f.atasi" .d other problm df.ctis& the health. ..Lear. ad .,fay of the rnUtata of "uho Cac"eng• .d nsrwdie8 cities. A. City Conseil furtb.r declares that regulation, to this chapter "allied are designed to eliminate It *"""to tarb prebler. yak f ■ ucalanse So. 1. ;. 1 2.12.670 WI,111mv. tar the purpose of this ebmtee, the follwtag words and phrases are Wised and shalt be construes as hscaLufter at onto .+less it is apparent fro+ the cement that a dlffernt money wan Intended, A. as,rl vises - mac ram, fertllLaer. or our tan of solid aacrarnt produced by cry and alt fern of dorstie mime or mmorcial Illeatoth. 8. CUM - ran the City of 4acbe Neemga. C. WI CICth - mass the City Clam at the City of Rombo Ncsmna. h. ClrLn y.n-e+ - muss the City ftmg.[ of the City of Usche c4mmaga. S. Aall anon for the Purpose, of this chapter all N omelat and InduatrlQ virus imledleC the following. but .et restricted to retail and wbolesd, +tern. factories, service chop. hospitals. convalescent ►are, Construction rterialt betels. octal., + ruatasrate4 and attics moplaest breru[, sot included, all mite smoldered residential as defined by Cbgter 8.17 of the taecio Ca6as 156 341tiCip1 Code. yV. Casat+•+rts esta+ts7 - *halt men 611 waste uterisl �a 7 nbbL,b frr the cesarroctlaa, alteration, opal[ ewi&- drolltive of building or production and dmla7esar of property y rut estate or eoeralat ASasteo cost," torso or radacaritg process which era handles by tbt atillaulos of roll -off receptacle or cry other type of mctasN [emptrle. 0. Cuaal - muse the City Council of the City of Rasehe Ncemya. 2. 2ss+dws ya,rs the tare hasaNw, vast+ &hall Include atramly bumd", sure at Lafeetlona waste as amb tart are dafisee by the Contents health g solely sod* auction 11100 at set• or as sub Is dofiosd by alt regslott..e parl"tod ado[ tbass sections or by the sate 0spartmat of With taniea. 1. e.••as.0 -tau and include, weep cover of, am every cancer or pawn *be to is peasasato. of, or his the as and central of. • car"I.1 at Iwatrlal mtablisbu st. J. t..dtraa - tae, asp retest collator embolism by the City Council of the City of Oecba Noonan, to railcar raises alai+ the City prevent to this Cbmter 8.17. h. Peru, - u .W I. this staple[ sew ap Imividal. fire. roper rim, association, or g[wp or combination mind es a unit. L. Saints - lorludas asp end dl types of rubbish, tree% or other waste uterlal referred to 1. W. Chapter 8.18. U. tats.. Causer.. - euu cry pane at perms'. tin. eepe[tnmatp. feint Venture. aaeciatt" u ematatioa •&ASIA is the collective. trutpattatlae end /er disposal of valid mate end /ar Nbltb to the City. �ft3 8 Or6lraecb 1b. NO3 aoa-6i sradeblO rue, or rt6 el Oet r..trl<tad to, ell lun, tree as' ebrrb tilled JrD Vech .. blt$r, car66eard, road P oduta, erochep,l ll "M otram..lotblel. read, r eeutneclee "lariat aN debris O" atb rtal, piaatla. 0. e,oata m... bar "bb:,. /dlar ";dote. �- ...Idi Owner - to peepaaee Win rata$, collector. !' 2112AU - (acted" nbblab. free or "grlel of n1u. eD1cD article, of 41-. drolepad, h Da Retreated, •trgs'Odt ru, d or V• o6 L1L1 ultae, each nordvae� ON woe- ptreaat% 6 .0116 at nbbi.b. blpay y.., !• feln f - rasa aga$, ps'w 1hO Wile Otrrato- rp6 aN a11pa w fee Clp pO' "the Ve� aee or are ben ftr qt owlet • :b/e S' =tabb " leeleGa, bet 1. Oct reetrletN at del "1, r%ecJe$ r ether "t.fial. to' eeep rcanlet(de 1• rOaddV from tb feada Velfat es' prepnu ti all eaubaptlea Of d101a _• s'nldt.rr .Rep. d..11q 1, as' rerele of rata. $A, sir feel. t gttablde. 7- r repNre getN ale b sub the cue, ertelaore• ai tlga wean unrldy Or t. Oes► /Nrtrlal. de"rle a" oquie refre es' ndtoe et ar!"fe bald far "all or 6* lnit. rgatable eAd "fall vattu tear hlegaus . dldq gone. .Zlet's aotJ1Aor ate rib. lbel Al to es' ba dllq "ate. lob. other plan ratatJlu Oe lydaat as' feel. fn1n. !. Offal, defeat rule at the Vargas'.. at aelaa [LY es' feels or { uancyclJle Itua, paper r "let "Warta. 1. ro�j�ie v N wry tree!. II be bbd to alter. eonpare es' coll"tly 1.111. or eo but to D• VON tea the pryeu of oe tnvOprt :des', Cr� 111 hall tab wt n l"tles 66777 of the Cellfon e O 6bpgal f $,due. otr..Y. orabblab wad to level rDr f l mraant C"O, the peal at for nO nllettlee alb Jle c6aprar wad wry, so a evNitive for lI.�ly Caleb bwo " toad frta gab erf luu p as "relte. -gdrel the [dental prloraaecO d sub otell "tide : ba eFe C[ry COrec(1 •a0dn e "Sat Jth chart" am be tear to !aura ae6 aeMl tl eve t 1Oroe.1 amin la aaterdaece r$,t that wry prdtna oYell fdl r Veda.. q eoo�l. ea Je C°aetit. to the the M �� s'lAutbp ROr• the Caret l6 ec 7s' eptl ..toad • nadlt /s'1 of tau r gaol ea e• roan Praia. Iv lent 7 r/etec verlVe to tbO alt$, •Nadel as* at ll",. the Caeeefl •tell aetKbe rpblrI t• a" blab!tt aerobe .1; Or d lee fOOre t6 blab <elirtlaA aN Or ee ., nt$,. trot O6d1 DO free to ls'u Oujaled ape, be "nex term a ►..t xdtab to ee l/ rite tbo s'eu et ells Jgtr '. egaar tart eN eONltf es' ! pt" to the aroaa6 bf the Ceeecl1. Verb ql� 9 Drdleaerr, so. page t C.If.rNgt The Conseil botchy do*. datPrmivl the, he disposal. and/o[. cellnetlam of refuse, t.,ab. r.bblch or otbat .Slid cart, In a ,"I.* to be Patterned is the City to accotduc' ritb the provision* at this chapter. The City gay true tin to tied parr a to to thou Patti., netting the criteria of tp Chapter 8.18 and m[h other standard* a cup be establ /abed by cosetutig6 at the City C"scil regarding the collecting eC '.fast. weelek aced urban Pored of solid rut, frog c*aneccisl W industrial atallisbnert. Ca long st any oub permit rml., in fart., cellartiea of neterial provided for hotels any be made caly is accardaug with the terns sad condition@ hereof, Inch (an@ .ad charges for arch cellertian, reedral and disposal Servlru obeli he thou which the Cwacll sp !new i to tied bere.fter Approve by tnalscioa. No parson .bell *MISS to the business of callsotiq, —,as or disposing a1 *ay safe... tranb, robbing Or ether •slid w.at. witbto the City ,roe say coenerri.t or ieduotrial mst.bltahmt ear transport the fame over any public st11eta or rithco -af-wq, .610#6 a Pamir to do are her first bun ebtflgad !rue the C "scil W such person Coupling with the Provisions of this chapter and any ether rgwptioss which bare bug adopted purawnt to this chapter. bat,ants etlrat.f tail. arN ", It it calreful ad a miadesces , for asp pert" to collect It transport commercial or industrial refuse Within to City "'*'a garb Pareoa le • pernittt* an berth dafleed or 1, meupted Se ovtllsed is A. h. C. or D of this #nation, and it lm anionic, in gay pogo. to permit. allow or ,at., into 6" grewgmt wha11omor fm the C.It"cien or tranpertat/w of rafnae true asp - coedraint of industrial establishment WItb any Parv" Who 1@ sot a permittee as ►erns dallaed accept a@ permitted LA achssctlei l/,J,•C, ez D of this active. y- 1. IIb* "llectlaa and zwwal at tau upping, nod shrubbery by Wi,ldmmp date% beat..,. an professional landscaper., who. the cotanetia 1• directly related to tbsir garb, #hall be inapt Cum the raise* Persia "at ". S. 1 Pandttea #bell not be required to collect band". or dangerous material.., pet of it, rqut.r collaties .ctinlay. Lipid cash -.. Pads. btoba.rdoat. tlsmeeble. asplea/v* edtarialr, tagrticldus, ged sicalar substance@ #bell set be deposited is collecting cemimaa. C. Istvttiwt medial waste Co. defined is California Malt% as, Safety Cade 21117.3. us enended true time to tied er et. successor ►rovploe or provisions t %mete) at net be eelleetad by a peed t tre. layeee producing 'eck w0#,va shell stucco bagel* and dispose of terb material. only t. ch. sum approved by the County 2111th Officer or deeltsated deputy Ise to accord."' nick the Calltoral• dealth "d safety Cods. D. The "11*ettea .ad renal of recyclable material. iaatgdl a. bet not limited to, glass. awtpapore. aluepma W ee.dbased, that an* Separated altbor for twso or tar the matvbatmre at saw product *ball be eregr hue the ref's* permit nstw. Prat b.nan r.u..ef.. f. a g f . I* emrasc/.,. teib an to bunhdago of getpaot, er othat anfor.,0#e at aapeovantabl• clrwnetese.I. wbme in th• JodPtat of the city Muggr r. designee the particular eltnetlao Justifies tutu acting. the City Mahar or tmllat oaf forge L /.sited mar tagorgq pmmit to private area.. or ce11oratioss to parferm aay of the services ra,;+r•.ad by this chapter. .object to such re.scechle Mu. char.., a" tegditit • at 'he eirvometwocc: a" attract set us the pea ti., lnobed nay 19116 sp"f panting that curb Asa and .berg., received from or paid to ,ay private ".sags at cerpo'atlesa ceder this Section for asp p*rled neeusdiq flftesa fly) days' dmatioa Stall be *ppmed by the Cmgcll. y3o Ordf mots go. cep 7 sot g.m0 [e....e re11..N ee. A porulttes *bell act collect argue of eeb►bb at , lOcatio l.'• this file hared (100) free a rnideattel or" belong tee bona of 6100 p.a. and 6100 ..a, the follwion day. All'.rbu ref.'s or Sabbisb cellsetteu cep take plot* at eptive, value united by the City sunset. sd s.nte Lee.. reuretee— loin..*, particle" *bell aged." all reasonable ease Neu diligence In collection refuse as a ro to yrsst gllllon. scattering or dapples refuse. W shell laedlaaly, at the it" of Occurrence, clean up cry rack g111ona. ■d L.M Lre.. Leon •lee. A. aeoPt"In age to be gprwed by the City. I- 1Ocapt"Is' .bell be am at ra c.11tlated .'a1, heap duty, total? coast" .w W painted, look allot"t, mitt flash fitting lids; ruaarates. feed or" ... lon, or •ry other feat loaning utabli@beaa are result" to ban cantn4sla "" IU to bold lba open at lust .testy dagaoa vb11a bal" I'! C. for ittas shall a total, all receptacles furnished is good eeb "lesl a" tuitary condition mhleb $ball include periodic claupt to provide a" aalatals a bip degree of sanitation. 01 atgtulu @ball be ftotteatly a istale" in good order, c*aplataly captured if vaslgbtly er damaged a" .hall may. eaapletal7 rde@blab" y pseulatue a esfudry Qeatu, or as dlt"tsd by the City Langer or du /gnu. ■ �3.lee _fL....._r ee e_. � -la. [e. rellre /e.. A. pacept "lea a ball be rapt in ouloseru of epprwed by the City. a. tacepaotu shall be placed am f.nba than tea tut it" the earn Ilan of a publle &trust. or it that. I. so each curb, to further than to toot flga the proud Puerto* of the patte "rue; 1. the evert the rscyp,alo is to be collected Lem a POW* attp, the receptsalo *ball be plated WJtbia tea fast of the edge of @br fish t -ot•.p of aid alip. C. 1s 60 cue ball age receptacle We placed Within the pullie sit ►e -af -any, Of any plus that mwtd float. a b "afdrea .treating as domed by the City guagar or d.'lgue. AJAX$ tot... Ummo1. All refuse cast ", presaged or "regulated is or Ant a eca ocal.1 or ("atrial ta:abllalrst to the City .ball be traced loan the pradoas at Iona coca tub n a. It *bell be ""let "A a ul'd.guuer tar .be - "pat/ —" of try at the abwHucflbed predw to fall ar eag1Oct to profit f" the anal of rata* at lust as Ott" as ptuaribad is Me Satin. 0.18.130, acb day's violation of this $"fit-'tall be treated e" eeaa.dn d as a separate d dlctlact effuu. A. poralttse shall dapase of collected vusas, at parnittti s "pug, at a city directed landfill er fatter felt** is a enter Satisfactory to the City "d to accordance with all fats and Intel lows, a" regulations. oral "nca to. page 6 e.1e.110 t t l, t t - t t mU,`. 9, • A. The r'aoral of truing Weal, beading or other rol..* •!re. coaercial of lease, ri I est-b166rw fu defined A t "ale@. L17.032eL) err -that pines able* highly tefutless or geological dill.@.$ here base pres"t @bell be pefore,d --der the @.panlsloa tad dir"tta of the County of tan R,tr,Mno '@"Lb &floor and eggs ref-@. .ball either be pines le Costliest& 'or raeptalu nor left lee ras.ler eollestlaa 4.4 d /spa@.l. 6. 13011 tlasmhle or .#01st/.. or collusive refuo shall not be Placed le an't"'"' se [ugtalu ter Ideal" <ail "tl ere and dis"Aalt but Oall be Cameo under the ampanl,Los of the City and/or the 4agty prn141q fire protection stole* althl. the City .s the espaa, of the wane or 0aeses.lo of the notarial. C. golmaa as eeba aslid one containing warn or other liquids shall be deals" befog* holes plated in a container or raaptaci-. matter which is a-bj"t to dacayotlan 'hull be orepred 1. pope or other notar( ef .1 hefts* bal.s placed is a Centel.#, er raq[ale. D. balasl ..sea. ss blood' defined, .ball set be platted In scatafelo. or [aeptacla !lo ,gala collation W disposal, sea .ball be rasored at the "repast'. op**.a. IVtlul2 be aalrfol W a "sdaea." fa lop person to rlelaP d3'' prertala of this 8netion 8.16.130. g.1e.14e e.4"d .. X"". board". vat* is . rant*. or embisatlen of rat*, ,blob bawl e[ its gmaeltys emr..#t.#tiou, err physical, cbsded, Of lef"tina chuatatlstl c* so oitbert A. cease, or sigolileantly eautrib.te to .. lure.,, is "reality or an increase is -@rings Irrnorsible, or laupurintig rere,albl.. ilia..,. I- pate a substantial poorest Of potential burned to bases b..Ith as anttosret able lgrgesly treated, twW. traospant d. or disposal ef, or others/'s seemed. h leads. era r"eired e" to 0111- coq tes.rdnoa "terial to sty rewiar sserloed by eeotr"ta. la the out that a customs plus. sty bur -4--8 menial to a container Miced by steerage ". paradttoe -ill net be ragalaed to eft ►lo collect the arterial In the container or ,pull. not be notarial before penetrated the -Ill. e- usher. par'lttes shall to the er'et that it leadv'rtntly resoror'ey banned". mtlelal fen cmsever ". so.caleag. @.toss said "ter"' to the ssstaer •pan dlstnnn of add mtertal. eaeritaee @belt ...lfy e.atcasers of say baordaaa "tidal (nand is Costliest& by gaela8 a tat oo 0al4 eouefaw. paroltru- -ball keep a dally lop Job be odors of auk assessor 'be" Cest&leag sae not esrsicad and .111 prnido a COPY of said Ig to the city at . mathly basis. It shall be mortal wed @ oalsm.au far coq panes to violate any prortaiaa of thin toe ties 8118.140. ..tees, s...t, -. & t t -t It I. "Irsf.1 and a alstsr'eor !ere sty pew to bat, bury or deep refs- within the City at as, elm. ..less a spatial parole fu each battles. burial or 4aq/& ►es be" Issued pea.aot to "tb "Ity eotlerr" by the Covell, and/or the Apuy prorldtg lire prornetioa ad"ice.!able the City. Y 'v. V it Ordiesete tees hp 1 6tsate d...sw of gegtl{S. It it valerf.l and a d•d•w. t lot say Part" to otere or ncca selaty aay :dote. rubbish ar dtullawnr debris, la say neuiaer or at ary Ienatiw arbor toe$ . bndnaboeo a forth, or tar SAY Iergtb of tine arbor tbse to follow., A. WMILA' lt.e stall vet be accmlatet or stored an carrsi.1 w ladntriel Ptomlose for a period of tine I. arum at au week (raon day,). accept /a Cho cams of restaurants. food pluaniq. A" ones feed handling est bliobwote there .nice shell be at lust nits every ones days. to la►bksbs ether thus ref.s.. shall at be stored or "C.nelated for a period of ties la acm of we west (mat days). C. The one peril. of tine kIcb and to reef cask la vbich a holiday Occur. ere atendd we additional dry. (.)-tare U.. .. Tk3"U. toy parses who deals, is operate ►vlvatelT w 04 undo.. reach. or nNksh vehicle vadaT paarLiatt of lkin tbgtn shall Placid@ their vehicles are water tight oval are pgeridd wick a tight cover. The City Reuter or ",issue Aall getdn be pardttn to rev. from .tics or repair tkne vsldcl@s that allw or permit offensive Bars to .cape W/er ed.e to be ►lavas dropped er pilled tbertrow. ■.u.tn v. ,..tt...r -r .. -t... � rtes A. 90 Pennt bstwsea the ►ve18 of 6100 P... ad 600 am Atli -lone a edv. track patted w say City treat. --pip I- No Waeb between the ►true of 600 e... aced 6100 p.,, shall leave a refuse truck Parked as aq City strut for meca than ens (1) over unless City Namager or dsolpte to aatifid that a break data or emergency ale.. ■ ltaee r• „twee est.�, yCb truck of a perdtt. @ball at all tines here is the Cob the gesidtratian of A er s track. a Certificate of lCScnce and as too utI Icatian card with the auto of abuse to tQepbon is case of . accident or emergency. lack truck bell also be Nipped with • fin (y) young fir• attitgulsber certified by be califo•oie State lire marshal .d acacally .acbatged. ■.fo refuse, ni ti e f • e set - t , all .Calla need fans ,tau. n ►t@► uUar .lid taste C01161tim vitbis the City .hall h egLLedl • 1. To be Completely ewtued with • rigid. a ... bonbaet char vbile na.pttiap rte.. truth or rubbish is of through the Clry. Complscaly enclosed with a naachsebeat ever neat Sue Truee track or nbbLob All but be visible frw be ” trot at tali coy of the Substanc. be pordttd to leak. aPill or boeeto dextltd elect be public street@. I- All trucks uM in the ever. of t..t or nobble► collection @ball be Painted aolne approved by be City Kas.dee or deolpss and identified or truck mural,. a stores? late. aed Intel telephone Utah.,. Tuto truck, goal be kept cleat and In teal repair at all tier'. -- :+ nest ■.Stn T...t 1l1MLLi6P. A. garb cf aay pardttai • trxkm @ball be male &,$liable for +� iacepectiva at be discretion of the City Manager t dssipea at WY polar of eparatiea. - y3-3 scale... to. page a ■. , dotal to be lured asstatlf by the City for such tract • ceglyles with prowMene of this chapter W placed se trdcblo a cuepicawe place. Lljalf0_ ra..l ee.� . tee.t nt..aee. ■ + Cars puaittee at nentaia • Ixal Worbuo I &at wbi.b s hall be start:; for pursuant cutest between 8,00 a.m. sad 5100 pee. as .weal easels, dare, W at all other time with ear type of mtbsslen tar the purpose of taking reseges. ■.IaON ■m.ee L.Im feue.el.t eJ Idduedd L-IS.e fellers "Lab• ,, yet tba pvrpeu of this chapters all territory withis the City boundaries *bib quality a 'mm,dai ee 1.d..te /at ngWllshwuu ,cell be eauidered to be within a set- aclwlts ,mice erne. ■oa,]ae '..d ee. •. tsLe - . each p,teitt., —C provide hlsb quality conics h Iedutty et Wards sad supply cepetuts qualified. ttlaatifAhle ad uaif.,se, personnel *be move the reatdsst, a, Leda Cacsmupa is a ceertews, helpful age [partial user. A. The City any, at its eptier. r"at,, fie,.rpslatlng of the p.redttaa•s employees whose smite will emu than to enter auto " weak to close pralalty to private prowt7s • paroittca ,ball be required to bite employees Without rpaNr- Ee rue, t.ddsiea, color. estla-d stills• sm. potitleil-�` affiliating. of any ether aas aavit faster. C. dp employee delving parolttso a veto,* truce doll at all ties- bare to bit er bee pou..ties a ]slid sad appropriate vehicle enter"*. license Issued by the Lute et California. D. The p.rdtt.. tploy et 'ball he required to vac cLes Identifiable aalfores vbm asgased is refuse collective utelte nithis the City. ■.u.],a v..Jr Ise e.....n et �re.�tr.....eJe.., A. a Voteless, sac file a letter with the City means" or designee containing the felle.1.4 infatuation. 1, toes sad doscrlptloe of the perdttul t. far—out hostages -direst W address of total office of the poreitteat y. Trade sal tin earl e, u a Joint rmta,. or a partnership or limit" puotearoblp. the gams of all Vottorso st cooperation sad the news of the Wifieere sad their artestago of ptticiestlm W their ►errtmt '"...test 1 Tact, fdlcatieg that the perdttm ►os arranged far raises disposal to as area *base the mw way be legally wroptd and dLresd as directed by Cltyt 6 !ante ledlcUles that Mrdttos Is gmtitied' to ruder nfflaint [dose collection .,"feet L. 1 ordluaea go. fat. 9 7, facts inkatios that tracks ant gdprat carfare to all applicable peculator. of this ebapcaq e. sarlefsstear "Idl=e tilt plrdtut has ►ass la =friend u . tells omen far la =east of file (1) Years ad foaaseq let lass this flee (Y) Years .eta! efrntist =pole=, as a ping eeecaa is coasrelal rev. collection ,ad dispearl. 9. Ntlalutrq "'don' kilt pasaimm -1 =Ierlaoc, as a tae; Camara to ce rclal /ledutrid refuse collect /ea and dctpeul defilea ire, eptstioae of Cegertile dse to caret eaassglatM y U Nrdttea 0ethi1. still Ladd. length of ether cs.trerts. .as and alte of walctpllt7, actors of Nnta, prurient, lad the .am of ski ..... ct Nn= at the aoalclpollt7 being amnt. 10. hidene tIn peudttse 10 In cad ganLaC to on hue of California W is the cue of • tmleeulu ertasisd War t ►e as Of ny sent state, sultan IleIrys o is tudew to W star, es t that ►,edtea O California, 11, t detailed lnentel of the NCdttei . getplan ndtf►le for collection free eevsretal ent ldntrlal q 12. t Britt= akitaer fee, the Cramp of lea ser.ad/s*, t& Nrdtte a/tbt han or the Career rill On. at • dad a Clue sic parade for tt. collection ant tlapoul of .ollt vitro liable the City lidsn cad sball be attached to odd fetter. lY each eon p.+.lut feet. at teferstl tang s* a the Clan Iter aar rip era. t, rue ale n...br gate le....Nq Vice COmidentlan of leferstlea connived is Jerawatitad letter W following a p.blle hearing e,,acted by the City Cec.eil qtr at taut t= (10) dare. prior witted **rise to the applicant, to* City Cassell p Lena • pard t. lath Nreft wasted sbell early to nonmetal ed Industrial union tellacttoa ter the City Specified therein. A fee for processing pads gplintlry. .hall be cat y seselutiea et the City Cosesit with entry as se taut basic. C. ea.dlet e! e...ett.., before treating a Nrdt vest the prnbleea of this chapter. the CweC11 s ►all retain, the p,seltale u • entities to the ferdt to poet v(th the City Chet a east bed ar -=try bed 1. u Csut daterflW by th, Coseall add finished by • *,Mae. artery =thnlad to d, Nalotss in the state of California, payable to the Clty of taec ►o Cuetwnga. The bed skill be cedltlaW qua the fall ant faithful ftferuoca by the pardttea of "lifetime red" tbs applicable prwlsteu at old Chapter lad ,ball be kept d 9d1 fired old effltt by the perdu.m, t►rengbryt the life of 4, Nrdt and all console tbteaf. , � r. Rdiearce so. pane ID D. 1.deself".11ee t, nerd rr.., 4 a cuneitiae Of the City isadng a malt. Permittee Aall yree to appear Old d.1W all actions edaia#t the City arising ant of the ft""' of said permit. ad shall iedadeifl and *"e the City, ace officials. .1deted eMetals...playas$ and .lasts ►mis's flaw all cis!.. d.maa "floor, nr cage., of "tied. of nap kid sd d."riptlod and any W dl TQ.Iad •[t "says' fees W cFast coat, navtti'g dlt.ctly rr 10,:rdetllt @filled mat cif, or In a" vs, cone "tad •Itb the ..his, of to. perdq taeledlq, but not by gap of Ilnintio.e any "t OT of any sTtlnb anplslas of &Seat of pneit ".. The Peemittee AWL siceA and keep to fares darted the tarn of the Permit public 11^1117 sad bodily iQary /e"ca "s is .moue" detarmiW y the City Council W musk."' eom►eu"ties Let"., laureled .11 ampleye" of the peteittes. Copies d Such polteina, " c"ttf/ee"t erldesei&S Such paliei", ob" be filed vith W City Clark pric. to the w cotee"st of act time calsr /zd by the partIc. .A, City ad its aff/cas$. al. etlla .19. 1 .0 led &State a ►ell be eased as additional taeereda n all verb policies. ell a,th Policies *hail sunsets at a sialma a ptartda- rgolrtei v si.styday (p) dap gotta • to be gives to the City pcio•eto C."allatin. mdlfntatlas ar T .atlas of Ii its. The amdaifi of Peblta liability issetesn for ►lily injury game ptoptry damage abail be @object t thing W edjustnaat by No Connell. y. [n.nll ee.• deb .led .ell r elf [ and e.eet.ale.., The per.Ittae asst edrn to solids, be tvrw of the Permit in such • "Baal do Ba to comply vice all applicable ideal ad orate ter@ W r &Sd"lna Pe,rale. aied to ton c"lactles, at "" W transportation of #slid we The psrdtte. @ball ciao comply deb all on" erdieanres ad Tesslatlenr o_ the City W applicable ter• see rMAtieas of tie faulty of Dos lare"4111 " tuts of C lifdsda. ad *ball sisal, W keep is force .11 ,"aired permits wed ba'lsa's line"m cereogb01• the life of the permit and all r""al* thereof. d.f■ Jae tare trerlete. M Ends. Any peralt I@aeed parolees to this Chapter 8.18 .hall "Wide tar the paym@at of permit fm to City, obdl costal% additional f— Volt "* $stW to by red bees@" City W persist" a" shalt constitute • wrlttn "suggest at said parties. ■. 4Ne.we or r....t.r up ?craft. Be sueyamt or transfer of a Nrdt Farallon to this chapter Of 107 right elevated cast 'etb Met, #bell be ode in ebclt er •a part by the ►erdtte, vitbert the au"v'a capstan of the Council. Ia too "ant nap " m o titat or transfer to authorized y to. Council. the ".19.01 @bell ansana the liability Walt ether ebtlgotion of the va dttaae q3A " C o Oadlnavca g4-. foie Il C. Lyacdtlm• A park t vy be revoked by Oe Cgnetfl In for Watt that* Atl ciaq* of wceraby of may kind er nature of the operating coWaay vales approval Oaeter has ben obtained iv writing fees the Council. 1f it is dat*csiaed by the City Kanner err dasipte that peraitt60 be not complied with the ptnisiaae of this chytero the yera(t. 9d all attar applicable Wtatates. nrdleaxero ate and rl&etation$. the City Kasager t' 44-10-60 9%911 notify the pa,lttoe is Wit1ng of neaeglitace and .ball wdae tongueate sit►it thirty (30) days. If aetrawpt/aac* f, net corrected within the abowenalcribld thirty (30) day "tied, the Coufclt. following a public bearing apes at lea C4- (10) day.- written oath* to the prattte, say taal@*te the par,lt. 3.e.Hn "She ..f W'tl- Cetl..eetg, A. forsitteas ere advised that partieas of the City -a precatly Nil& yrwilad Correi.l and CWestrial values eollec.taa ,."Co... and :bat chase presently pWidirg urice nay here vested eight, to coati--, -aid 4-alca far ♦ abstvti 01 pried (.p to fire year*) -dar the prevULoe of 3ectbe 4272 of Oe California Yelth m Safety Code. pXd A cbarga a the Calla tine Of refs@* Well be Lsyoted by the wrdrrrn we tha aWoo of pa[oe in aatrsl of sub coaa,alal at fedu:rial 4-tablfahma a- hecribied to tetsv Cellettlan .."ice. The ..a of sub charges -ball be filed ad cba444 ttou tiro to ties by CU. patvlet a alter ayprwsl by realatwn of the city Cw-cil. 3• iatd.dfl• •••a. All omisinas to charge, looked by a perattee ova be aOatted to tie City Caeotil loo resign W action ad mat be mx 60,64 by resolution of eke City Council fellool•I a public heels, ups at least tse (10) day.g Witte aeries co the p rritte. 8,11.1m s Apthiljng. It any aseries. eobeectiea. @**Coates rlaue. er phrase of tbl* chose" is far nay tease, hold to be invalid r monaHt,tioslg sub dealatoe Ball mat afect the validity of the revising pwtlew. Ter* City Comat /1 of the City of 3aasbe Cutmi.ja hereby declares that It would here p4-e4 this chapter sad aash actin,, sabsecties, classes 4-d pbresu tbereaf Lrcespeetla of a. tat that city a60 er rte setti ao. sal9gntias. *Cats *Cassg classes or phrasal be devlered Levalid at aasenstitatio -A. W would hate pat 1 wed adopted the sou was though city pet*. rattios*. sebeatlee, est4-tee, cleft', er pleases that say be halt !Wald bad bee eaittd therattle. js l m 2s new the effective date of Ois Ordinance. 2ectlell 1.03.110 gut 1 .06130 of the hanete Caemage Waicipl Code sbatl be d-aaed tepal d. U3 , oral .... • so. F.S. 12 61012 e, fln s41ar ab BIS 8190 thin Ordinance 444 th• City Clark shall cuq the tan to he p.hlishad Within fiftcu (13) dqe altar its p-u.de at laatt'"e it n. ne.1r "m.t. - earl Np4r of 6-441-1 tintlufe0 p.hll.hed in the City of Ontario, California, W cimal-ted it the City of tatche Counts,. California. yldlD. Of101D, aad AMP= thin a Coq of •, lY. ITIS, sold, VINT, J.ffr41 ties. ttgar dTmT, hutrlT A. 4thtlat. City Cltck Said ►ldLy A. doI9IItT, CIlT CLld[ of the city of 4aeh9 Coce"y N' hlefo1114-110a hutlT 961ciQ tact the factsely Minute aao larro6ced at o rado"T (tpatiel, adJaarud) "Grind of the C"Mil of the City of tsecho Cw,440994 hold to the - day of -, 19-a, Ware finally pates •t a ry.l.r. Macias of the City Cuecll of the City of Iauha Cocam sa held u the - day of -. 19". 6tcatod this 0 d6- of -. IM- at taa0ko Quanyt. Callfatrla• fcrarly d. Jathelat. City Clark 4'k q3g Til 1 i i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Ka-, 7, 19G6 w 10: Mayor and Members of thr City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: RECOKYENDATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AD HOC COMMIML On April 16, 1986, the Council appointed Mayor Jeff King and Councilmember Pam Wright as a subcommittee for the purpose of recommending appointments to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Ad Hoc Committee. Staff met with Mayor Jeff King and Councilm^_sber Pam Wright to consider the appointment of 5 to 7 members to serve as the Ad Hoc Committee. As of tt� report, a confirmed list of recommended appointments is not finMzed. However, this list should be available and will be presented to the Council at their May 7th meeting. The purpose of the Ad Hoc Committee is to assist in the evaluation of the goals and objectives of the Specific Plan through the study process. A minimum of eight public workshops with the Ad Hoc.Ccmaittee will be held to focus on the following areas: 1. Identify issues with input from the subarea meetings; 2. Review background information and hold preliminary discussions on goals and objectives by subarea and study area -wide; 3. Review goals and objectives and discuss urban design land use alternatives; 4. Review alternatives /preliminary goals and objectives and identification of significant issues; S. Review preferred alternatives and address significant issues; 6. Review the draft plan; 7. Review revised plan for Planning Commission review; and, 8. As needed 9 i� RECO40MATIOR: City Council concur Wth the recoamended appointments ro e oo Boulevard Specific Plan Ad Hoc Committee. Res tful y submitted. Brad Buller City Planner :S' �3