Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988/02/03 - Agenda PacketCity Council Agenda I PAC1E February 3, IS'B8 I All writing- submitted for the City Council At-nda must be in P.s, n thee4�tdnesr a for submitting t. Ise fleas is a In Clerk's Office receives allrsuch itemshe meeting. The City I I A. c,t�' TO ORDER - -- 1- Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. I I 2• Roll Call: Brown , 8u uet ?� Kigg _., and Nr get'• Stout 8- ARNOUNCQUNTS/PRES ORS - Hone submitted, -- C, CONS, IT ENDAR Thn fulluwIng Consent Calendar Items are expected to be utine id ro a non - controversial. Thsy will be acted upon b Couneil at one time without discussion- y removeu by a Councilmeober My item pay be discussion. or mevber of the audte s for 1• aedrPayroll Aendingsl% 1%8L ,th1/20/88 an 1 /,11 /o* n 31,o61,e83,46, for total 1 ° 2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 26, 1988, 3. Alcoholic Beverage APPlication fo• off Sale Beer I Sine, Mohawk Seafood 12 Co. and Sheet, Suite Robert Carmen, 10013 E. 8th 20 I 4• H l 800 Z Radio Frequency 800 N of the funding source for participation in the nucber 01- 4124 -6029, Feasibility Study as account 22 S. Feron,awest ofhTurner, to be 101drTown located an Park' 6, Approval 23 to name the existing Beryl Park facility as "Beryl Park East- and the ten acre facility -Beryl 24 as expansion to the I I I Park Nest', 0 W PACE Ij City Council Agenda � x February 3, 1988 2 i 7. Approval for boxln3 and storage of three (3) mature ` 26 -� Olive Trees from tho 'La Mission' Labor Camp site. Trees to be planted i.t a future Te•ra Vista Development park. The d trees to nsorved J. ommema ate the histerical pest by them labor commemorate camp. B. Approval to awa.•d and execute Profo:sional Services 34 Agreement (CO 88 -11) to prepare plans and contract documents for I;htte Alder Tree Renvals In Tract 11934 (Victoria Planned Community) in RJM Design Group. The amount, not to exceed $5,000.00 is to be funded from Landscape Meintanance OistrIct No. 2 with a loan from the Beautification Fund. 9. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement 48 Security for *Tract 12902 located at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenu• and Almond Street, submitted by Nordic Woods 11 Ltd.,, a California Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. E'8 -041 50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RARCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMrROVEYENi AGREEMENT, IY'PROVEMENT SECURITY, A'4D FINAL 141P OF TRACT NO. 120U2 10. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 52 Security for a Traffic Signal located at the intersection of Milliken Avenue end Ease Line Road, submitted by Lewis Oavetopm3nt Company. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -042 53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIOHGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEFENT SECURITY FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD 11. Approval of the development of an 8.2 acre integrated 55 shopping center consisting of four (4) retail buildings totaling 87,581 square feet in the Coraauxity Ceimaercial (CC) District, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Ave•ae - APH: 208 -261- 58. f yr PAGE, City Council Agenda February 3, 1988 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -043 73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITICNAL USE aERMIT NO. 87 -16 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN 6.2 ACRE INTEGRATED SHOPPING CENTER, COHSISTING OF 4 RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 87,581 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOMMUNITY COMIU;RCIAL DISTRICT, A90 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTdILL BOULEVARD AND HELLKAN AVENUE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 12. Approval to aKird the Base Line Road Widening 82 Improvement Project between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue to J.E.G. Construction Company, Incorporated, for the amount of $264,307.15; to be funded from the Sytems "'• -- I'und. 13. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Security and Real 85 Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 88- 12) for CUP 86 -02, located on the northwest carver of Beryl and 19th Streets, submitted by Community Baptist Church of Alta Loma. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -044 86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH AND AUTHORIZING THE 141YOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME RESCLUTION NO. 68 -045 87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ACID IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 96 -02 14. Approval to accept Real Property Improvement Contract 89 and Lien Agreement (CO 88 -13) from Neal S. and Rebecca A. Weeks for a single family residence, located on the west side of Crooked Creek Drive, south of Hillside Road. r' February 3, 1988 Alk City Council Agenda PAGE 4 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -046 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC14 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL FROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMERT FROM HEAL S. AND REBECCA WEEKS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SANE 15. Approval to summarily vacate certain drainage easements 92 within the future freeway corridor north of Highland Avenue between Milliken and Rochester Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. e8 -047 94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, Sl84MARILY ORDERING THE VACATION ^F CERTAIN UNNEEDED EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND WEST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE 16. Approval of a subordination Agreement (CO 88 -14) for Lot 98 19 of Tract 7176 located at 8406 Orchard Street, submitted by Roland L. and Carolyn A. Taylor. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -048 99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOR,IA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FOR POLAND L. AND CAROLYN A. TAYLOR AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME 17. Approval to accept Inprovements, Release of Bonds and 101 file a Notice of Completion for Tract 15203 located an the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Center Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $58.000 Accept: Maintenatce Guarantee Bond (Street) $ Sj4:O RESOLUTION NO. 88 -049 102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE .!TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TkACT 13203 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLCTION FOR THE WORK i AV/Z//)R7/rW City Council Agenda February 3, 1988 PACE 5 5 18. Approval of Revocation, Release Satisfaction and 103 Cancelation of ,Agreement for Postponement of CC6R's for n acts 13057 and 13058. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -050 104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF kAIICHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IIELEASING AN AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF CCLR'S FOR TRACTS 13057 AND 13058 19. Approval of Improvement Agrerment Extension for Parcel 106 Nap 8617 looted on the east side of Milliken Avenue north of Highland Avenue, submitted by Marlborough Development. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -051 107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO:IGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSI011 AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 8617 2,. Approval of Hap, Improvement Agrcement and Improvement 108 Security for Tract 13275 located between Lemon and Highland Avenues, east of Ha••n Avenue, submitted by Oxford Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 08-052 109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AHD FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13275 21. Approval of Parcel Nap 10972 located between Highland 111 Avenue and Banyan Strest and between Milliken Avenue and the Deer Creel. Channel, submitted by Ahmanson Developments. Incorporated. RESOLUTION N:1. 88 -053 112 A• RESOLUTION OF THE CITY C^LRICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NUMBER 10972 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10^72) I PACE . City Council Agenda Fetruary 3, 1988 6 22. Approval of Parcel Map 11236 located on the north side 114 of Red Oak Street, between Laurel Street an! Spruce Avenue and submitted by Barton Development. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -054 115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PAPCEL MAP NUMBER 11236 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 00. 11236) 23. Set public h,sring for March 2, 1988 - Approval far 117 Amending Map, Tract No. 13058, located south of H1gliland Avenue, between Fairmont Way and the Deer Creek Channel, submitted by Pulte Home Corporation; a Michigan Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING !IS INTENTION TO APPROVE AMENDING MAP, TRACT 13058 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 21 Set public hearing fr- nrrch 2, 1988 - Approval to 120 Annex Tract No. 13275, loco' ^d 1200' east of Haven, north side of Highland Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 42. RESOLUTION H0. 88 -056 1 121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION 110. 42 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRIGP h0. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -057 1 126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL % THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 42 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 1 DISTRICT ;10. 1: PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO A s ,, , I i Mo City Council Agenda February 3, 1988 7 25. Se: public hearing for ::arch 2. 1980 - Approval to Annex 128 Parcel Map 1123' located between Laurel Street and Spruce Avenue north of Red Oak Street to Landscapo _ Maintenance District Mc. I as Annexation Ho. la. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -058 129 A RESOLUTI0i OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T:i£ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 14 TG LANDSCAPE MAINTEXANCE DISTRICT 110. 3 RESOLUTION 110. 88 -059 135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIrORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, 111 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION, NO. 14 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO ',11E LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTICAS THERETO 26 Set public hearing for (larch 2. 1488 - Approval to Annex 137 Tract No. 13275 and Parcel Map Ito. 11236 (various locations throughout the City) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. ?v. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPPVIAL OF QTY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 37 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 1 138 t 1 � n n I PAGE .1 .'• Agenda City Council A9198B 8 February 3. p. 145 RESOLUIlog NO. 88 -061 ry .. A RESOLUTION I OGA CALIFORNIA - OECLARING ITS OF RANCHO TO ORDER_T1fE ANt1EXAT10N TO STkEE INTEtRION LIGHTING NAl'ATEMANCE DIDESIG8ATING15AI13 p <_SESCMENT DISTRICT: S-REV AS ANNEXATION N0. 37 T fuRSUANT 110• li t, ANNEXATION LIGHTING MAIATENANCE OIS1'RIGT OF 1072 VNOSCAPING AND LIGHTING ANYT NEARING 1. TO THE O PLACE FOR AND OFFERING A TI AN i OVLCTIGILI° THERETO 147 Sot pu blic hearing•ior narcfi 2, 1958 - Approval to Annex �j. 27• no iof 'Iighlaad AvenuestoonIto. Lighting Tract Ho. 25. �Y north side 0l strict Ila. 2 as Annexation 148 r' Ja.,. �^ P,,4rtenanca .-- RESOLUTION N0. 88 -062 A RESOLUTIOM OF THE CITY COCALIFORNIA,CIOF �''•. 07 RANLHO CULAMONGA, PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ESiREE7R'LiGNi1NG �. FOR ANNEXATION N0. 25 TO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT no* 2 154 RESOLUTION no- 88 -063 i CITY p RESOLUTION OF THE CALIF COUNCIL Of TNf. RNIA. DECLARING ITS * OF r"CHo CUCAMONGA, To STRSET TO ORDj(7ENAER STRICTMno. 2. AN t' 0 LN1GHilt G ENT DIS DESIGNATING SAID t ASSESSMDISTRICT: ANNEXATION ?.. PURSUANT 1972 W ACT OF TO THE L0.4DSCAa H E AND 1'l PLACE FOR HEARING AND OFFERING OBJECTIONS THERETO 156 , 28 Set public hearing fo, Parch 2 1988 - Approval to A,-,ex lccated between Laurel Street and Parcel Hap No. 11236 north of Red , to Street Lig'iting Oak 10. Spruce Avenue, I District No. 6 as Annexation No. I .Maintenance t 1 � n n City Council Aganda February 3, 1988 AM/W PAGE 9 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -064 167 A RESOLUTIOI OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RESOLUTION 111. 88 -065 163 0. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, AECLYRING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TG STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO STREET ` LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 �....- ANU OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOP NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO D. CUNSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearinEs at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- coitroverslal. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk gill read the title. Any item can be reooved for discussion. 1. ENVIRDRMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT GISTRICT ENDME T 8 -30 - CITY 0{- .WICHO CUNNONW west to amen t e Deve opment District ap from Low Density J sidenttal (2 -4 d;faling unite per acre) and Medium '.gh Density Residential to Gendral Industrial, Subarea 1, for 4.31 acres of lard, ttcated north of 8th, east of Grove Avenue and west of Baker Avcrue - APN: 207 - 541 -60 and 207 - 251 -12. J 3 PACE City Council Agenda February 3, 1988 10 I ORDINANCE HO, 335 (second reading) AN ORD'TJUiCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 07 -30, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FIICM MEDIUM -HIGH AND LOW RESIDENTIAL T•J INDJSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET EAST OF GROVE AVENUE AND WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APN 207 -541- 60 AND 207 - 251 -52 ENVIFOAi£NTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN 165 N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKCH - A request to areend trie Industrial Specific Plan to expand Subarea 1 to include 4.31 a:res of land generally located east of Grove Avenue, north of 8th Street and west of Baker Avenue - APN: 207- 541 -60 and 207 - 251 -12. -- ORDINANCE NO. 336 (seconn reading) 167 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -03, REQUESTING AN ADDITION TO SUBAREA ONE LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STRECT EAST OF GROVE AVENUE %NO WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APH 207 - 541 -60 AND 207- 251-12 - OF A SPEED LIMIT- 2 CONSIDERATION OF ation to A �s a 35 H spee an AMR { Lemon Avenue between Sapphire Street and Archibald Avenue. ORDINANCE NO. 337 (second reading) 168 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 10.20.010 n,NO 1u.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREET` 'c. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS t The following items have teen advertised and /or posted as public hearings as required by law. The chair will open, the aaetir_ to receive public tesaloony. � e= -1" PAGE City Council Agenda February 3, 1988 11 ; 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERNIT 87- 172 , 05 - !(- PT'('TiL - R 5 AND CROwN LUTHE LHUP.CN - appeal with respect to the use of, roof t e and the 5 completion' of Vista Street with a temporary cul -de -sac, for the dpvulopment of a 4,900 square foot sanctuary building and a 2,300 square foot office and classroom building on 5 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) of the EtAPN: 2211461-03. (Continued from January 6. 1988.) 2. ENYIRONHENTIL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -27- 202 CALIFORNIA SIN SH - ppea o the Planning IF toamisslo' —ten spec s on requiring undergrcunding of existing overhead utilities along 7th Street for a proposed warehouse addition in the General tadustrial District ( Sutarea 5) located on the southeast corner of Center Averoa and 7th Street (APH 209 - 262 -13). (ContInvad fnm January 20, 1988.) '.. EIOIIRONNEIfTAL (SSESSMENT AND DEVE! OPq! CODE AMENDMENT to 204 Be- 1- --CITY OF Ri NCHO CIICAMUN - emen mkt . -c�tlon '(93b .j1jW,z of the Development Lode pertaining to parking lot and sidewalk sales. I OP.DIMANCE NO. 338 225 All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING SECTION 17.10.03062 OF THE RANCHO ;UCAMOHGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO PARKING LOT AND SIDEWALK SALC� I 4. ENVIACKMEHTAL ASSESSMENT AND iNOUSTRIAI SPECIFIC PLAN 227 NEX ML H - � �(ZNE�R L YN I a - amendment tot e mss rcu at On an or t e ndustrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 1D1 to eliminate Cleveland Avenue, north of 7th Street - A?N: 209 - 272 -02. ORDINANCE NO. 339 231 AM ORDINAVCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 1 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGaA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING USTR:AL IF , AKtA AAEhDMENT 87-04 REQuC-Tl;;G THAT CLEVELAND AVENUE OF 71V StTi FI) BE DELETED THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAt%' f Ci *v Coun, it Agenda Fesruary 3, 1988 12 S. ORDERING IHE WORK 14 CONIICCTION WITH: A. ANNEXATION NO 35 FOR TRACT NOS 13443. 13441 PLO UR 8 UR 97-1'5 244 -2 U I OCAlilU75 THROUGU U FYI 1b�fATIEffrff—GiM u RESOLLTION NO. 88 -057 247 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIIIA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTIOI WITH ANNEXATION NO. 35 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTEKANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT JOS. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13445. PARCEL NAP 10617, OR 87 - 11. DR 87 -15 AND OR 87 -09 _ B. ANNEXATION NO 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 13440 13441 T tt 260 I4 2 NGF 13 INT NAi U DISTRICT N . 3, I TO . E RESOLUTION NO. 88 -058 263 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC4MCHGA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 110. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 1341,0, 13441, 13442, TR 13444 AND 13445 C. ANNEXATION NO. 8 FOR PARCEL MAP 10617 OR 87 -21 DR 273 B�1�D� -8 - 9 RI U5 OC N HROU HOU C. Y T 5Y5�'T GH HMG NTEt N D[ R 1 NNo FESOLUTION NO. 88 -059 276 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF W. CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTICH WITH AHNEXATI'JN NO. 8 TO STitEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. G AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL W.P 10617, OR 87 -21, DR 87 -15, AND DR 87 -09 e i.. 1446411 PAGE City Council Agenda February 3, 1983 13 i 0. ANNEXATIOfI NO 12 FOR PARCEL MAP 10617 OR R7 -21 285 R -Ib U DR 81-UN &1U IWK 86 -24 (INDUS 3RIAL COMMERCIAL) TO LFOUbLAPt T ENAN DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 08460 288 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH 7NNE%ATION NO. 12 10 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE UISTRICI N0. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10617, OR 87 -21, DR 87 -15 AND OR 87 -09 AND NOR 86 -24 F. PUBLIC HEARTNGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive ' public testimony 1. SIl'1NARY VACATION OF CLEVELAND AVENIc BETWEEN 7TH STREF.f 298 AND THE A.7. a . LR4A0 I —O69 - Tecate Milliken venue and Haven venue, in connection with Amendment (87 -04) to the Access /Cirulation Plan for the Industrial Area Specific Plan to eliminate Cleveland Avenue. RESOLUTION H0. 88 -061 301 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMHO.RILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE BETWEEN 7T:i STREET AND THE A.T. 8 S.F. RAILROAD G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public te3c10011y, although the Chair mat open the meeting for public input. I. FOLLOW UP REPORT OH OUST CONTROL ISSUES - Northview 304 r ve, erra sta. •.ant nue from .Knuary 20, 1988.] Y. STATUS REPORT ON CITY 'IN HOUSE' RECYCLIrG. 1 306 i PAGE , City Council Agelda rebruary 3, 1988 la 3. ]S{''(T'�A'!TEES REPORT ON ASSET FORFEITURES IN DRUG RELATED I 301 .11.Yrt. H &_UOUNCIL BHSIRESS The following Items have been requested by the City Coun6fl for discussion. They are not public hearing Items, although the r -'r may open the meeting for public input. 1. ADVISORY COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE TO MAKE RECOMMLNDATIONS OR APPOINTHE O-TME ADVISORY C ISSION. 2. HISTOPTC PRESERVATIO4 COMMISSION SUBCO",gITTEE TO MAKE 309 WE—COKAENOATIONS 0.1 PPPOINMtII E11T iM ILTIT TSTOOM FREWRVATION COKMISSIVII. 3. STATUS REPORT ON WEST F.ND COALITION BY BROWN T. IDWIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is tho time for City Council to iientIfy the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. Tie:e items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next eceting. J. COP"ICATiORS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included an the A3enda. The City Council may receive testieony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. K. ADJOURNMENT 1, Beverly A. Au:talet, City Clerk of :1e City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby cartiiy that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 29, 1988, seventy -t %o (72) hours pr0r to the meeting per A.B. 2674 at 93:0 -C Base Line Road. •lant.ary 6, 1988 City oa Rancho cucawnga Reduvelo7ment Agency Minu'es Iqijular Neeting F s CALL TO ORDER get eorlNednasday9 January 6cd19811 iinn the WLions Park Cutmunity Center. 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. Tire meeting was tailed to order at 7:04 p.m, by Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Present were A9encymerbers: Deborah N. S °awn, Charles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey y, King, Pamela J. Wright and I .hrtmmn Dennis L. Stout. 5 Also present ware: Executive Director, Lauren N. Wasserman; Deputy Director, Jade Lax: "ity Attorney. James Kirkman; Assistant Secretary Beverly A. Athelet; Assistant city manager. Robert dtxzo. 1 •! t i f f Ili, CONS CALENDAR BI. Approval to receive and fill. current Investment Schedule as of December 22, 1987. MOTION: carmoeJ unanimously Ss,D orded by Brown to approve the consent Calendar. motion C. _PUBLIC HEARINGS There were none. The Agency aojourned at 7:66 p•m, to the time the City Council, item G1 s considered. MOTION: moved by P.uquet, seconded by Wright to adjourn the Rede. motion Meeting to the timr whon the ei:y Council will be considering item Gl. motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Councilwoman Wright requesb!d dosed session to discuss personnel mrttero The meeting o in adjourned to clagenda session Gat 7.07 D• f M. to reconvene at the time of discu i I INS , .•w... w I �R'�_7d}Y��J r'�j- L��•. _ � _ ... x -� ., is : t -', -5 t"., ._�+:4•c`,,'".3'i_r"'�� ,y'� • - : AYE .k RadaveTopment Agency Minutes " January 6, 1986 :•' I'age 2 . 0. STAFF REPORTS The Agency reconvened at 8:00 p.m. D1. CONSIDERATION OF REDEVELOPKENT AGENCY PARTICIPATION IN REPAIR OF NORTH SIDE RESOLUTION NO. 'di 88 -01 A RESOLUTION OF THF. RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DETERMINING THAT RECONSTRUcrION OF PORTIONS OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ARE OF BENEFIT TO RANCHO REDETELOPMENI °ROJECT %REA AND DETERMINING OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO KTION: ►oved by Buquet, seconded by King to approv', L..: =A budget transfers and Resolution No. RA 38 -01. Motion car -led 4 -1 -0. (Wright -no.) E. COMMUNICATIONS FROM Th: PUBLIC There were none. F. ADJOURNMENT NDTION: 1Arved by Wright, secordcd by King to adjourn the RDA meeting. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: * ■ 3everly A. Authelet Assistant Secretary 6 I 4"0 So WOOS 1 , r ., vim. 1� ~ December 2, 1987 City of Rancho Cucamonga ' Redevelopment Agency Minutes Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER „ regular meeting of the Redel,el0Pent Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, December 2, 1987, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Ralicho Cucamonga. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Present were Agencymembers: Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright and Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Executive Director, Lauren M. Wasserman; Deputy Director, Jack Lam; Senior RDA Analyst, Linda Daniels; City Attorney, James Markman; Assistant Se,:retary, Beverly AutheleC; Assistant City Manager, Robert Riz »o. R. COMiEOT CALENDAR 81. ;�proval of Minutes: August 6, 1987, SeptomLer 16, 1987, and October 21, 1987. 82. Aaproval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, UP. MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by King to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. C_ PUBLIC IIURINGS None submitted • e • • • • 0. STAFF REPORTS D1 Mr. Wasserman stated that this was a follcv-up from the last meeting. The Board had asked for a Job description for this position. .r..w: - • L w r;Q:�s /,. �,y_ ;:; �.' ,'F�`�:"'u,�:'�`0`goC•4;;'4'tsr Redevelopmeot Agen:y Minutes • 41 ? December Z. 1987 Page 2 Chairman Stout called the meeting into a closed session to discuss Personnel matters and property negotiations, The meeting adjourned at 7:04 p.m., to a closed session. The meeting reconvened at 7:30 p.m. ACTION: Concensus to postpone consideration of D1; to come back at an appropriate time. E. ADJOURxxE MOTION: Roved by Kin;, seconded by Brown to adjourn the meeting. Notion carried unanimousll 5 -0. Meeting adjourned at 7:31 p.n. Respectfully submitted, " Beverly A. Authelet Assistant Secretary w 9 , b C, r January 6, 1988 g City of °incho-Cucamonga ' Redevelopment Agency Minutes Regular Meeting ¢ A. CALL TO ORCER " A regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, January 6, 1988, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.o. by Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Present were Ageneymembers: Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright and Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Executive Director, Lauren M. Wasseem3n; Deppdy Director, Jack Lam; City Attorney, James Markman; Assistant Secretary Dev ugly A. Athelet; Assistant City Manager, Robert Rizzo. B. COMSEMT CALENDAR 81. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of December 22, 1967. NOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. C. PUBLIC HUAIMGS There were none. The Agency adjourned at 7:06 p.m. to the Lire the City Council item G1 is considered. ROTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to adjourn the Redevelopment Meeting to the time when the City Council will be considering item G1. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Councilwoman Wright requested a closed session to discuss personnel matters. Tle meeting adjourned to closed session at 7:07 p.m. to reconvene at the time of drscucsion of City Council agenda item G1. t « « « « « d R,r•v -�_ �k�;.r�•-'''.:«',ytc`-- riri�i r',- T3- :s=...,rr.,...• ';'i >6ewa Redevelopment Agency Minutes January 6, 1988 - Page 2 D, STAFF REPORTS The Agency reconvened at 8:00 p.m. O1, CONSIDERATION OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PARTICIPATION IN REPAIR OF NORTH SIDE Staff report presented by Russell Maguire, city Engineer, RESOLUTION N0, RA 8e -01 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DETERMINING THAT RECONSTRUCTION OF PORTIONS OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ARE OF BENEFIT TO RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND DETERMINING OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO MOTION: Moved by Bequnt, seconded by King to approve the RDA budget transfers and Resolution No. RA 88 -01. Motion carried 4 -1 -0. (Wright -no,) E COMMIRIICATIORS FROM THE PUBLIC There were none. �. F. ADJOURNMENT 4 MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by King to adjnura the RDA meeting, Motion carried unanimously 5.0. The meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. r Respectfully submitted, a, D\ Beverly A. Authelet Assistant Secretary APprove�. a VJ i °pa °ooJ«$piiof.i� «�n Nn°\� >oaooa o�°w�P O O g�B•°'.s•°^e° ^ �' � O°Nr .^ry•OPP O.Oi�Na l.N.o ^owf.N.e °.°..N. °_ah�m�°e n «•°.n N. °n an < ][ 1 � n N N �• ! 6 =� 1 ✓Y•aFYPO_N_IVnladhOPONNnfO OFOPO_NnlNdh O 31 a_ww.li__w_.•N��fl1!•l hnr �I•��Fh�•F10•.°•a.°•h SS rtiF ml SOOOOOOOOOOOpO 00000Y00000000000000000000 11 NM1nNNNronnNnM1NnNNNNNM1NNNNnnM1VnNNNMnNnNNn NN i W a n z L n z WWZ u W Yo c' SSG N c i� FN ii zPi z ..S•° ui < �.•a <.- o00 o o c o 1 XW ILY «Y UUY Y �ti Y OYVyYY�Y Y uv o W w °ow J u< W m23" 1 Va ^ W OWU �r ✓v • Y6 • _ OnN ¢6 A • NW v ' YQ<X� > J 001ry N i00A oOr oa <✓°• }qi °u m CJOR ° < 4 JVy�O nLL MJJ! VP_ N Of •YNYO V; ` iNp =N�10= O OWCiWNOYN ••'✓F V {MNNONrNN N < 6.}• ~O rW �uNrW t -a •, OJWJY ^FJJYJhV� J p1 W i_�r<l tiN i W _NV-wY Y•xii• tVmY VW •✓V xJrz <y •\ <oomoW_WWNa N• p � � YO�r °•• °N_N� � ° >NV_ ^QCOLR>JLJ 06162RPJ�a6 1 y N V u L V i M Y i 9} .N+o a N _ 1 Y° a V •Yi uTi Y L i w•••i 0 2 •L( J 1 j 6✓ i � .<. Wo.°+:i zrS-o i >cNrt �i u>r� ew V'o\ 1✓�. X\i °Td o.°.�W N .•zz. 'Ile :u12 ° 1 SNaOwO OMF 6 Wn J6YVti <•L .•nlLnW�a°mwmW3N ^ •°FJN V 7'J'x ONtW40w<Q y <J<JWmYJ � ' }o <•tm oza•y uaWNWJ..0 `i�t_o� io <_w_ J W : LI 6W006 � >•••• C > Uiit��:BLL , O<Iex6<4itiW °m W i i u✓<• + ^a_�aoii .°rva «•ta ahaoNa < > <a <gii a� °n 21: a^ah n•s aan o_ > ^frnlnnnmf oaaNaln_nno Pn \ \ ^ON Ff ^q.• ."a °•.0°O•.ON ^ONOPPnPaaP I PPPYP �Iy�N< p��r OPP Y C PPYOPMYPPPPPP 1` VY•P•yd0•dN<YNPN�Yf�PrO JVOOY•O YYOYOJVO+NNP M•OV 1} N iMFY° DD nnnnavn nnnn >mm�r, nnnnmm}ma�s� 'm >sn�>a.'.n �n��aiyzSOZSy «z €,awL rrr£�r ce> a> im m >s�ern�..t }Mats. z"�.z..�>irwt iaooaoc >orn�TV:zai � ,r. 7= ON 1Tn »S nt >TYnm A_aTN NN° > y �} e e i4nP2a a yyS •.n„ MYT.S•,° MN�n Pyr{D j amymeA �>ssTmonr� on ila � iTs >x r><,o Ann «a �>r arr «ni om >�r� 1 n^S Oxpwrw w ° }y pN TS'OOm Nr yl>Npn. n_42T ST Y_YL 1 ' O N m'O.n+r�> r« Yb iN° •ai y>�•t>'am GY a ~° L /i rr T y i s•i itzar n� "zz rn � mi nss+.>. as i i e m N M »9 y Yy r >m4n°jna >Cq T ' N C O 1 OT OT n�.aen »[^ Cm •Ni � ° .. _•C O Or T O �nxuY x.(r -�, y 1 or it .•'.. � 1 zAnnc> <Nmy TZePDDA 1 > }NaAAeNN t.. >aNmaNa>a i a rxmAD ii�yi�s Ao >•x« nv m.�NxTxATx ..eT i a «y0a0 MnDV y >OOU n3 TCpTnO�f Yarmti>tC }O(�O i�n� }eswzrmr }aw Aaap 01CCPYmtiMw r'Inr ? ~ }NM H,ai. aEN NT>CS> ~a >>• ° >MaN N 1Iy�� np•i•• w =�.N.n +RrNDfymO nC dan>(.n OY,�Mr�wN }N.Ti.d 1" R •� OIVNty VSV >wrlC °m >°dY•T+ AONOM Tn 1mrYOY >m�rNNnY Bx OMV V r CNf «m MYSN�SY S O� TO KCYY 00 •. nrSN 5OS, T°• 9;.i yy %i. af+•_._O N_Y O 1 C >S n � NN� aMf•• L Vm °'1 �F. '.Xa " wNlra '°i rm• iA N, r wn a� om 1 nn n nnnn «nnomnn Tn n nn . -i ��n e' nmz 7n n 1 -o o0o tio�e�nemo °� x > rn••. i od •�wr a i « «NN • °p•°i a`+Oi n= sd �TVJ 22x ,i nzm7 �5 ;° wp NrR. •x+ � as r,°. °aaaa rDaoda•°•: a�D ar as .�. by zASI PI'V -flab 1 a r .°.. .N„ «w 9y«'�Owa tyw «� � s•Iw °> o\�m 1 > J NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNYNNNN N YNNNNNNNYNNNMNNNNFN M. SOOOOOOOdJOOO« YPOdd0000000Qpb «YyjYY ~yyYOP pvl.VNrOJO..ONlVMrOOPYP Nf VNr O,db YpP +VY�OdO p yvrArrMq N.+.r y. P Vry1110 <YWOYP�M1.+ia uesYau iul O OPOrV iJ.VOrPrUOrOrOG PPa.°n °o�oogi n:°vorf +aa0000Pag� °owo °no ooS rd Q.i °o g� °oo °o °v °off 11 . a y Y t a S � C > a m S N 0 i i= ONE ppOepmOpR�00 OC.P OOOOOOaDO0000P «OOOnh • 1 OaSO «YnpOea•• ).� CO O.�N OOOOOOhhOMO00tlNUO tl1°O n CI OOh= ^O.•�e •NryOh•I^'O±m ^nPtlh= MOPOhPh e.. <1 yn�n raY IarrrN _ ^nr nPhryr ryf u ai Ya i i PornwYtlahoPernnYtl pPOrN nYtl o al- ahoPOr�niiiiii orr r..rrrrrrn «NnneNaNnnnnnnnnnnn 4� oeeoeoemooepoeq pp oa meoeoeoe`n e`omomeoe Z 1 M1NN/p'.,OVM1 NM1YNryM1M M1NOi ^I p•.N IO•M1 IO•.N M1�ry �M NNIO•M1N M1hM.O•IhNnryNM1M1 V Z 1 w L ^ C N W 1 ao h.n6 �y •'. «.arm n F a a x .w.. r+oYrnr. WP ¢ ; HOPS uZO 2.f iO P nq � O ~PW Ommhimw Wa P r °' `a2 LYYNYS 1 R RiR7 Z f•.fHi i nn m f Spa_ lfff_ O! � 1 VO O p ry= O O O y 1 y �V�¢ SY�YyYY Un O U-1 VUVUuw zuw. J¢J� JOJ 4•Lr Y;YQ 4<¢mOJe4666.Wt6�� ¢�J JF �.pYLr ry NONrNOYOrNh000 r y6 ryeOLL •�<OOOrO 1 W• NOJytl-J <a2 O00 UW�J OLLNDmtMNONN�W ND rm¢�WO�•�Injn20.[¢I.l rOr Y «r.•n ..N6N O.m. 0 ¢1 L�,N/.O 4Q�[O SOYfJiW J iWpY. !lRii� Yf MONO •OY .NNNNN �2 ¢ONy J ¢NI•�iaN__ p�WONNNNNJ__t . o NI nRV «YLL ^2¢Y ,Y,Li�jLjN� <y2 jY<LNLJN��aa�_WaJ�_� 01 W: Vy CUT¢aL L YSV¢Vy WVMV N <��<UVVVVO40cpVW_ W� �<. 2-•< O< V' i< � <YO¢O_OpttV0,06 } <L40c000Ya¢40_< `` ,9D YW -6y0 22�� •. 0296) _ r +a�1W�4~��yW §6�ji�OJnDm42 rL_rLW aiiW `i.J...W,r.. v.4.. •..'n i`r �.`.s.,a.�oo §..•. LL <�W Z.,.o vu�'o abu <6.n+oa42¢ua2bD?W9¢Lrora�a n.WL .WC i_W�¢ub o s ¢ , z u u u u <OVi L ¢ V Y NY< Q LL Y r<90NL¢ _ .. Y JV ENV Y `•. R Y4Cn0 Oa• O W p " W O VU O a 9�V UfWwWU 5��< D "W aa4O ¢ ow2 lJJ¢ WJ.41L y6 9n< � C A ylj Yt �+� IOUV N.Yry �.• :9 I:! "1 C: 3 ¢_J m 3N 42215= t NL6 �Y § pJ•. pJ =N ~j 24 SMW _ ,Uw ••�� • w24r pya<C9 0.... - < L W'yo<O.LJW> oM, YLLS �aa aJWS4 zYµJTi U �z�wiio<^ Sy<W_N NrL2.6zauLUW os .• .9n �'Yi sa,°..W.u¢e•LLWisiv.ii iO.N.. ¢.. n¢ii'NYU a•L..N._c a.°- u:.,4.1 Lzs Dt•<WY��¢ • LL up rUu avoss,n JNV___uN4LN 3JO WSJ 1 <. n oYNtlun .nhannaPhYhraLrotl.°ntlnYryoa nhh-. Ylyyj= r^P�yw�a- - ---- P Nn:l .. 1 ...°. ��...,'. .. � °arh"h. ^ia..h. ar �h- $n ryN�r 3 } •1 .... !� S „.S. fir': hr•� ��- riu�PnJ r law^ i- "i «oJOU«y «^n �Y1e JN Y1 `I-Y. Y-ro >.J rr NhJaOJJO nYN ^VJOYaOfVOOJNrOOMNOrOVOnSH NIr'lPOf OT pLOTTbTN�Cmn ^,L'�M)1 >Rm0 >SO•�yTMf3 ^233 31.yJyJ 1_rrr >�nr>ing nzzi }�nZrlrAy TYY2><> RTnStnnTDT 1�•M I^ w �m ^r aJ•+nnOr II OffZ Y >mN�mx ^O �i trNT xl.m OTT1 ►�TD�. Z;" Cl MT >YYY '1 T 2 S>32+ Nm.• L }>} > nnnnbr n ^N� oo Z-' !+ r+ +_.n mr }re}} ns nnn -Nr 1e 3•Timo yT bTn^ OYNnyaOr r{J flp^ Smm } nN 1Vr+ + Dr 03• •S '!yN nSMa ml•r A}TIS •� �in YOYmm }}Cp tnTaNN rn YNlV 90 yt•'w2 NN tN fci�si Nf0°, }l n.m ra _t •+ r pC�f >S � ♦! .( r .[t F''. 11 b yylfiSa lT1 'n MnBjipT�P$4 Tf 03 op« � °r >r i i. r'••�im N Nc �.Nr. a r{.ra zM r> °zo •> O SF Tm0 Nyx° c oq •^ rn.• r � N f m •( N N N i m O 1 � S T TO VOTJmf•N npOffI1NpMO TyyTO COlT aSTT <VT ` ^C <m.•rfrMrC ^h w•�mmV�rinmrnt lr•>m�rw mr ^ >Or'r csis �Yioi�a �°�roiunoauovov�N��c�ooi Q +con NYrnm T>'T r 1 rr0 }rrrn wj roY z to sf vmiMyNN stt >z sw >tNrRasou .°- «:r! «a «2 SNN .N a }vN xataP �• f^wri \f0 ywf T� VII• {M ZfiV f Vy VnNV p V NO�NOf2TNY f� l�r Viann O�Jr^N 1 Ono ^w Oi_PS OM_N S� ONrOT SMnpOyxO•J!2 • _ Yt t�[ y dR i� �lC e r " yS t 'a a Dr'n I' T aq DrT T• pTAa faZyA 4TOraroa�t Sq n nnn nuhn ni>n nOnnOS sN}nn(1 P1^S�Nn n „00 n 1 �tf Yi fauti {if y {mIPS I'll rif yD`y °r mlf N� 1 3 =sS� y�rjirm JOm �samOr •'r r3rr •:m Tf 1 mime m DVSAV aA Nape ap ^JaNS TarA�iNA D`VN T }A r[SIOrP J Ou0 YNaNPN 9 f� =mgr yArP � Y Tm Nm N rzrr .3•r w + « �rnn.°\m 2 1 Cn oyyy> NyNN NUNNNwNNwNyNyNN�rNyNNNNNwwy4NNN Ij ^ og°oo.�a000000000m oo 00000000 00000000000m .> > re ememememPmm muse ......magi meemmememm a OOOmPmVVVVVVJVVVPPPPPPP4 PPPmgNN JNVO m.Z=o ja IJ paPJ VVJwVrOaOVPN1VNrOJeVPYJYN ^OaeVPP � Ix.s > V V +P 1 A m YmN' m�Y YPm1 N J ^ u SVNVO aV'yer Pr� aPrPrpPPYaOrNarVO OrOPO r ✓qPOPYaVOPVrN•I pMNPO 1� J OOOrPSO0u0000000PO000000g00000nPo400000R N0 Ir l _e'•s tY � .x'i ineeoaao o +Coe. +M1NOa N000 ao �- .ao «poml -meeo a000 +YOySanooyaN _or�acfunS oa Propaa_anNOo +. s� i'Y Oar -oa 'or ocia rr.a �.'. >,tl'orria 'moo el.rnFO�ry„m RI ^ nNNn N i < all O PPPPPpPTP °UOOOO OY'°°-y r- ^.w- .°-- .Pi.°i.M1NWNNNNNM.°'Yn { y S i .`' M1N.° V.° Ve° i�Nf°VM1ryNNN «nNN «NN«NN « «NFNN..Nn Za 1 -5.*, w W Nu .iir Y iW 1 o WWw u«<ma fa __ mprNNWrmwrWW _ SO1 SZr 6i_ L^ r+2..22 . Y tl VUt O.rir Nr..ZN• N° . •tltlf C_tllrfr0r 1 OpO O ° 00 Y .- uOJVY�YYV _U y6 Yu YVVY�Y ^VY =UY YUY U - 9•'�°<J'J 9 a�a NioIJa¢J < z�� 'Y im +.�zW..� oreoo.Jn.1 - °'oNN o i °rL FW« �r :JO FN arm.Ly <'mn m i z °Vo { <.a i .J+� -w ia�tl�w� °LL n° "os<m�e1r.YLL +wwWS u LL °Ji °. r.°�N"JeNRNmgai�`N '3NNN MzoNNO� W uo �. fWr• Otu�f J�tR <OW¢wuZYJUYry¢Y�t {WNas<�WZ�uY W.a�fL ULr V V ywy WUSV �> yYV<Vtl�YULVYU''NrUwi 6 :9eW r'�t R<4 <NWrpp01¢Y <i0<U./r mi'J V< • �V4JU¢ i6 V1> LLVSR�Vtly� ¢WLU."]LLr¢Nr <O¢.Wt�dCJP2�Y.', V T i � < ' RNZ JVJY i i V � NZ L NN C UUV V U �tJURJ Z_CJU U4 6V W¢ ¢NnVY `r.. U \YV Y'� 1LL V.iI L<Y-W7 .y wr N sor�LU�ii�JW R-. �.F°.,z`Y°`�S ° : :3n.s..zm�• §�`.0 a.ro .Y :'-. . �.Z'YO i <'V= 06N2=wJiG« RV��lm b04¢Jl(SSSSti �/' i. < SwiD6UNiii = JU.J<V <WW..OL) RI\ «W��W r:i Y{W7«< ?�u 3YyUWW 7.J m 6LLLLLWpw6pLL��yW ¢¢Y[Jp <LLRRNVNNNNNNONNNNNNJNN U p 1 LI °«'.riryrYN <ryfn ^nom ~r /Y^- y"j�O})NaFNrO.. Mn +.p11A Lri ri .. wFatiW r . Orr M JNr�tir w.+r wr.. r'tl °rd...iw nnnnnNnr+ m? n . i•39 . ^``•RC. t✓ _ _ , fi5R :%SnnYna6s5'xn'e3 &'aSbEaF3FGB fiFFz'aF�" . 1t Be a cl IN 4 V t A wi1F �i'S�E•��?sa2Ca3 YQ §� ��Gl es3�33aGidr3a�3YYrde�?�a33d �E�� Will Yf a � 3 A? <!��rtr�ifyiiioxgx ' 4$Fi'sa;salEfE'�'si'isxsFFa'axa 3 Fjafsaa stags z a sa a assssaakxa�cis'assassasss s aasais a !F � t£ i E ji ifaF6�FaF?FaYiD's Fxa'a sx's as 3 F'sYxss a ._ °• a e a as 6 "ssiasziinYasas isirkta# 7 ; .ti sassiss a zssxsa Er a 7� �7i6f S�3FY 01i if ifF fff$�5Y r.rrr 6x0991 s r rr s is rrrrr �, rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ? � 922 99979'91111 = _s��- rrrrrr, nf209>!f e� n e7 ? 9509668 &3EE3iE63H39 4 �ai1Er tad j! � E� E ajfF- si: "asY`fG�6fsaxxF_'sa6as 3 jis'iaxy ! E 1s t s i8 Y tip f jFr; t #E IIg�[�t &$II is YiIIE a G1[EaiYil itaiiYtY3aiaii s xii g zxzx $ a �i�s C gERE�lTt�RRL� MUM i3.3o -- X33_ ii�iiiii3� � i'iiyiia�e�ls�iis3 L =t- =?d33 3ili�a a a! r c _ __ - E 9 -s9$5 i3 i 4 V t A wi1F ■; 9 |i a@ \ - .�•� }\ - �I | �i -zi | § Sail }/ ! \q& 2 l # ■ 2!§ . a- ||| !!! ! ! v!2sex \ ; !!e 5 ! swev §B ! ! !| | 2!: far - -"!!!! § ` si |! kq| / �� ,� !!! ! . ■l.... ! ! &| 232A A i | !■ ' <!� ; ! l..,, B . #| § | f| ;� ;; � |� ||||||| } §| | } |�� |.!. � Kw | ■!l,E, - |� | 9 _, � P � k |'| � ■ ! . ■ )�|; \ � ■| | | � |� ! k J ! |'| � ■ ! . ■ )�|; q ■ | � |� ! J ! W} a K ' f !| || |J| | | || | || |2 # | 2 | 7 I t. q ;| ■!! §!!! !! - uz !§ ! l(p | ; ■! || ■ | || | : | | |J | § ■| !§ | | §| f| f , ,� � . ! � , ! . | | ■ a { � � \ � � \ `�� 4 ' �| ■ � � � { � | f |� { � � \ Y r .^ 4 1 1 I JPJ ON1YfPYJNlPYJYPT YY +OyPVJyJPpVVy Y•'.•PJ Y,pPVUYJOPPPNNPPVPrPNOPYVUUN �M ! t i YONYNOYN•oOVpJNpJOVip <I•PO OrVrPPPpJ 1� rl •a f, � im a f• aY «r +NNliNiin /< T « <C»t: ^G�YNraYwJN NLn }» YY� TO O.+>CTC p ` ggLL>SYInMCMrYi p nNNNr %aF. «<r'� > +A f iTpB i= P'1 : Y JYNnni %N %NyY °... -Fs�u� Ow Or i «m r•nY m ^. }• nM JMMNZ I M mrf mlFm�n S• Vm EmA.•S YCin Ot'n YSJtCN ; y NTrN� Oi0 > •t Y• T y2(] OVT TL 6Ym !f•i CnNan y M rl•mw Gf Orp CwnS `'l ^�� Hurt ' N• wrY iYMJ b i.wmn SJN :T Irfz %TrnS� roil '" it}•Inm 1 ?ng s Nm �+„ng F N I A n P �mU <� qT � L SIw O.nlmT O C n • ;1 n O Oa z r � n •+ _ 1 C N a 1 o r In - P I TTT.Ia nwa }Aro +a >A nrnzroo raayy +v «zr Y•••P <iBNmmce o 1 1 o^•�mion�aenMMF T+ Ow 2�TJTTrwi FOr�MnyVTTJ�SNw 4£R £•2PiEr'�SFfe f2arYiLr:�$o >+ii �, IN pO1+V TY0 Y 0000Cr'Fm• > }V 00pNSSS 1-! n 2 i 1 n^ (�pA�2M�' +OITOt�nD >a• rM •I• f�au�' pYC �� 1 �T T.PwKgsr•1•a >rr V >wr -� Y�I• OFL ETG TEi MnN FMf „r rN 1 nNn1•PS NL O_ yJJppNNN I �< *a^••pi2 T MNS N.ywM �:IT mV C ff IS pnwNJ O pE ^ >pn Ywpit'O Fp >ly+'.1 PiC}mN' uOp9M0 Vi Vrr+ONrNp�N T Cy 9 +YNDi i .u••oIr �+smNY r nnre a Nr ^wo °FpuPN + mN�.. m or �Y v wu ieo �+o °o Y`.°� ev S• °: din a.. v o yy 9r TYJ >P �� D A'6imIT Dw� Sr1•D g aJ .01 i S TDi� ..1 n nJn �n nnnM min n�+ignnn 1y I jnn o• n >y °p y nP• 0°\7° �i iYNa m. `JJpn iP n ^iiYnp i S�< zzJ s YA> S yw�4.n mT = < P of yJ PPn Ja M > £ N Nwp M 1 a w O N NN tb S S�R3aSa .R9$.SBaS<.SSSa;t<38:S3d..8S PN iPPOOVPPPPVPPPP + + + +: +.. + +NUUN VNrO<pYPP+VNr000yPP +VNn000•JEIw �.Vw a ;O o� .,I I N r .• U N n I p > T w pppp rr Nj ONNN� p .000<. I•NU �•P YyP 1= p N�VyOPOpVOPOPPVYOJSVr <OUVOrNYP +ONY P O ••ONOpONPOi }pOVPOpOOUV pwPOpp •.a• O 1~ P VPOOp000VOJJOOPOONON «NO CO,00SYO+JO � Y r .^ 4 1 1 a�i i 11 !�L S i J ? .r t IJ 1 t• 1 ' O O O O0 'Oa SVOPS♦aNN888=O p U O 0 NOJ0 O - pp00p0p�O <1 P Y n�iPip }�ryrr� NhM1f 101nnnrf n•If Y�Pdf r 4 1 I\ a rr n ly n { ryr '],� o �i a a' N. ao° `h.»- n1'�••°- °0000ua °`» °W OIIZ- s a'sa >s faoasa° ' nMHUn$SSSStitiSRSSrySrySSSSrySSSStiSSSSSY aa° ni-. I�- rP- o s r J w 5 1 P O O W WL W •Ju r \f ry YU <J�� 6 � r` je•�•Y 0. wQY!6 f 6Q oN 6<00W0QQ K � ��pC' -JG �•Ji �l3p < �iGp i •� < W or w pass oNr i u s � • Y <aWp .� cY • ��W^a.l. W0 1 < �• NI ♦4N 4Si }n WULi O.. I •L O 2 O o < .a �F4SW.t i< PN J PY 7 <YJQw` O 06.a 1..•2 {U1t ..9 1L \ CrNNWO O^W 1 W b Hr <WJWW♦ �Qha4 a�QQ N•. a000 `QWJ 81 W QsN QWQ «�� .YQ Z0. ^:< C�Ww V ra ooJ J.z..o �QYE >e,� Y:W�r t• ofI N � i �.{. z W�.W.0 s +W `u W {zJCS �IQ�.s c� p I`I rz r��ii�Ih:W.z. °seas °u Hgo.. O tiiJ i• ��O�O�i {ziY .. Q <NN ! U <I••NL vVr �J nrrN -rrJ + u � u J n r O 4 ;i u •( s r .- N t- u .Oi< Q p i-...» W r nNW zi�r ocQ WN W r a)Jt1 VS NW C< IIVr+J OW < .. .r• <FV U yi O..W SWUN� L ySUahrN t Q rox J.Vi< OU �'L •. V f = •.YJ6�W66Lr <V t WWr�yW<W� FQ 006 Y � L WMY11I L4`u`4<VQ J`6YWN 4YNNSWNVVOn1 O 1l O p 0.0 O <i<�ijCU U..10 {<4 <J <{erOO��dVVVY h� <; » y < >T N.000nP LJNwOnhNO >hNnh O I r >�Par rr:.l MPP•. OrnwN: .VnINwNN -r.. • r 1 r w •Vi N w = � ^ +whhr} PVrO �. � .Oiw r'.Qi •• I 1� r _ 7 .,i �j• it �`'y�'} � �'i')! � r e•�'Sl^��" i`w .Z MT» 4L►n PMnoeY b noia�•mJ•d� z i\a`o Y' °i ••OVMOyo:n ,Y\yi p wi uwJM. «y sN n �.�'�• { v 1.Y.1 iw�ni ien:T� i >v=1 •'sirzo Ir+aa 1 RO nR��;; •\i ya•>. zGrnn PP y}n ��nn; nnnnn ai { r Sis •p00 t ry a O•2lyOpy - O 00 1 1 Sig z�PO'T N-•I•Z Mn� 1M11r .ii.y CY' oii Yb Y.IN ye. pJ VYi- •88•YMy�•NNI.. ••J ••PTV J OJJ ..1 V 1 Y �Sf VNVPM VPSIVpVpy V.10 VV �NPV PMS\MNV NNONyP OVPPr S� N �, ` OLT O� VMnn�\/\n/\(�nn Rnnnn n(� M O •4 �+� '�W } TTI.TTTPVMI�.IOnp ai'iN NOI op »YTnY .>MMrF>rC CCCCO npp p «.. yQa i�Mc S o _y O VPNf VNV OOb VPILV yYO.OPVPP�VNYOyOJ VLMYS »D•epai nN \GSJ.I.V Vf\ s yM a >r {i {`IOI\\}�MMY �YwNJa 1 r f1" SiSTPIiRf }�1°TO P.'.r >MIO ♦•�2 OSNO }nnllnA Cry NPSnOp��a MN�p>p Ii OMY 7Z �'Y «MM OMZr ' • { y � z • J�Mp V i N�\n P�si�pn QsPYii: CN ; SI�PNPPPPw.Y.OP Yr ONrO Vy YMOO VyPJN ••NVVUPO i> y nM O r«rn J> an . »Qni NYZorY wNfN iRi pz»ac te� pe A ge n r>M N u p Iz• a PPr . { T z w� .F (I• L.> .M ; Z :(Rp Fi {n Nfr >NV ie �c�rLF�Tr 1 °••P- - °• � >x• Ia.. FI Nni`a.Yi.» MO n Y �V�r OM ZTP.•I l+� lrM .!w A.. I 1 N SYNJ Y nPDaDDyN R pPn � M SI /�Y mn pn nnyp S LS RE; US, i ii NF If .°..n< Ylnw M .; rr� Jy.N..Ni 1 Y-Nw � { 1u/ D f • S R � S , • S 8 n { MT» 4L►n PMnoeY b noia�•mJ•d� z i\a`o Y' °i ••OVMOyo:n ,Y\yi p wi uwJM. «y sN n �.�'�• { v 1.Y.1 iw�ni ien:T� i >v=1 •'sirzo Ir+aa 1 RO nR��;; •\i ya•>. zGrnn PP y}n ��nn; nnnnn ai { r Sis •p00 t ry a O•2lyOpy - O 00 1 1 Sig z�PO'T N-•I•Z Mn� 1M11r .ii.y ^J I`tw.11 IYi.�r.YiV V SIYw �Zi.! \�SODn T.D NID D DDDDOnIDbDa9 <� Dy 1III�r D tt ~ NN. V O« ww » Vr }O Nr If «n « Oa Y/.0 VrY�V w Y•INpD r'. Y T i.•VP MS O rN 1 1.. yN N.Yi.NO nN i M MNMM MMIIINr �•• 1 /�\ p�p f� 4NNNN4NN�MNNM4��r NM`4NNNNNN44YY4NbY4NYNYY {S C O VPNf VNV OOb VPILV yYO.OPVPP�VNYOyOJ 1 P � 1 � z a a rYY» NN r .. 41 is � SI�PNPPPPw.Y.OP Yr ONrO Vy YMOO VyPJN ••NVVUPO i> O�•PIV.N N Vr VP O0 y....1 �000PN NNV MONP VJ j( N (.`•VOiO ..I.IPPYNr S• u400VOJNYV4SOO�00 rNONSPMV JPPMYVpSS�Yp VNVr 8 r n L u a < R L a a Q 3 3 6 3 nF Proro a.:np°np of PNpp•a »era op os eranro 4 SP ••OOnOPP +OM1NOOi••POOpaOP00004O Ng .; MnnO r.I a•O w0••Np +nNN OI•NOndLf f3 r0�0.i Ory <Onn <rOn ••G O +rM1� +00 «nM1OpOO +M1 VV Cp «°yf Y'f ••< «nP:R « N :« «I•••fn Y •PP M1'« PI'• +N M1 MN O w N •• + Po +n �f r�no�o +�nr°aN OPO +N of raroPO +NnfN<1 -oP 000NOa0000iaoo�o'8o�o o'b'ou$o$ °o$$ °o$$oa0000e000 NNNNryNNNNI.NNNryNNryNryNNryNNM1h } hNNNNNNM1ryM1ryNNN r2 I:WW � �"a1• •a 'YW r G � WS n ..Li .r.. w1 .�N Y< •.r r aW °QR�nS I•W= NYI�W � r6 YQ W Br Z yQ i R OZ WLS NPr C +N'J I•.A � � Q •Z•Y'YIi �O L.Z. 1 + <OO�ZO .J L L LO 00 �OOy O <Pr <O •"ioouuaYU °uu WUW�aLsWOS uu� ru•+.�.W�ioza »N" 4yFN �J YJ R•N•L 6 N< LL<_> >uL <JMW J i +y I- U Nr1 NYI- .<a pYW yj Q76 W'L y +.tf PPV •> •w tQ. -00�ZW YGJ.�C.i= �ACJOUJ6 • NJW +� sid3NR . °W °. �"' n odiulgNNY °•+.w +$ > v. L.��i��..¢C� VI e.. •�.IUai.Yii �•Li •Ni.UrZUCa .�exi6VYtN I-J _• SWwMWUM rW -i `��yW02 r OLWWr Y WL CLO•[LN Y.aN aYVt< �^6 J LN <� .WLa L.• ' Wwij�•T ><Y< <W L JJJ 6 JM T6 sl- Q3a�5.N + Q.ar Q .aeYS a< +dPTNW +�< �8: s� o'a +•�: S:iaC�:aao L1aX va- «�0.°• =•±: <a.�aoimia.<- W ° uvam � •a u ' � .°.uW�i o 1 O N NNNN 6`ti iJ x J +a C N� ON•QO LW•<i •<iULd • UC6 J•LiuOUnu� yZ�pwp `.NIIS•• }i�Yw•;i�i w ia4 N L . ^VLL <V Z + +•J 3�VN <VO <•Vi�R VQ N JV { n.'f� QJULLVS W•Ni• J+ ur LJ6L LV <V••r z +u Noz +N NLL oWr z...T orN +o •d udWrN »-. z�' u +ri �NZ� s >LWS� YuNz JT6ZNCTVW +�•< y }�lUJ6 LN6 rd <JLL YU� O.• j = Ui>WOxt VWN:t> O( =6 J <r2WO•W WqY xiu o +Jai + +•.•±[� :J aip a <W_a�a R +s.: L oLSNU oLZ- •i ^..rr'•B Q Q_ s :ri »I-�- > O C•• •Yy >WiV < +•n 36WL JSNYTaY O <BULw•+•LL yoxT�r.•uacp .y ..> <uuLLO u•<a uJJ�.o r LY <WaJ p. SCVC Y Z n SZC <Y``ZO} �Y < • r0 xJQ a_p_Ol a••W �L< LWJ WY< t`pG ^WW�t NU• SOQJW <d a9i pNpO >ONNJ LSYWaOV1� d O >L p « • 2JY QN > pY <O <Ne•w OSZ +W•O J y of iooJ J-R T••Q J <arxi''1WU RN'aV N•-YOS �f Yr6Y ry T np1- Wir• .M1nO+N°NOOPdnPhO°N +M1OPPN +NnO +f MPnN� LLI n= NOLrOaO +d<Lwi PfyP in•.nVYNPPrwOrynry°O •I 1 ++ w +.N•P .ViP ^<y.NirP wH NY1ayS' r <'r��N ^ «M1I :n 9 i r O MaJ YI 'PMJti JI JuNr rl abl u.Nw Pl .NIN aIN nww tl L/T�M Oe. > ~02 O �1T s 1 N fi a bSNNrr«. «mma.r iii anni NAICIarVTSO(T sa ae °nw i'.ei oyq. xii a�a oa«An o n u_i. >ay ` J4T? N! a °aGn nn inn .o oe , grin ii .i. sus as �aa 1n1 SSSSS V.r annnnn nn n <n nnnn orn o appeeo o� e�- ejoyo L �aavaaaw apr aaaa SOY H.1 gNN�ii.tT wN Saii .°. NN NMNN NNNN"`.N4.N4«MMMMN4MN= NNN4NNNNM ...444..4 lnrn rr ` 0000 O O 000000 00 r "rr`r`r`�opr �oY`o�o`o `e oiaaoa�e�ayPSSyMP$gPP Od PrJ ►MIYNYOab p YNnOaPtiPVJVYrPaP.IP •uNne 4 MVV N PJ NVN 4 M �0.. VPVJM sPJOOMVPV V �!P N MY YV r04NYlPYaOiJJPMVyaPOlr ... ........YVaeOa! p SpIJ Spp VppPrOMMVNOpNp PrnJ Piro PNP��OraiPPwSuVrr ,li..J.Odu�OD00 iP�PJVOOwlSJ 10 k i a' �1 4 a i it £ n 1 f 9 T I I✓ �0 I,I` Ilavy`�VnrnOaYaa6M4r«�rPJNppanP +a P.r1y N«Y.IW aPn V MJOPPNNG ;1 4 NPNNNNNaa »T9wjab•�w Son on on o. T> IT ew� 1 e_r •- cogcc2eegw «y>n r..Tn�`<�<�.•.5 «ea.Ei.T . aT awfrbpTPN n• O� >- '«Y >`OT Oyllf.n. 3z sap I « �'n onn nnn n NE Q C bo by os >a r »>i P xPS i. a O a..lr ErrrrrGSbm•f+ipbrr � ne i w Pwn «s T1RTO�oUP� r c 000r000 ei�r eoN.awar M SSSSS V.r annnnn nn n <n nnnn orn o appeeo o� e�- ejoyo L �aavaaaw apr aaaa SOY H.1 gNN�ii.tT wN Saii .°. NN NMNN NNNN"`.N4.N4«MMMMN4MN= NNN4NNNNM ...444..4 lnrn rr ` 0000 O O 000000 00 r "rr`r`r`�opr �oY`o�o`o `e oiaaoa�e�ayPSSyMP$gPP Od PrJ ►MIYNYOab p YNnOaPtiPVJVYrPaP.IP •uNne 4 MVV N PJ NVN 4 M �0.. VPVJM sPJOOMVPV V �!P N MY YV r04NYlPYaOiJJPMVyaPOlr ... ........YVaeOa! p SpIJ Spp VppPrOMMVNOpNp PrnJ Piro PNP��OraiPPwSuVrr ,li..J.Odu�OD00 iP�PJVOOwlSJ 10 k i a' �1 4 a i it £ n 1 f 9 T I s •3 0 VJ p {Nyr s ri w <.ri Y u if iWrY 6 1� WpI p a J6 .O.I dp ifa�{ W 4r�6rWi . .. •.WSrj u°i > iiN irA{ Y. �. NOWOnP A� I ■ ': M—r •4. /�'A Ar'l1 i I .. NL MON�•n P V R. O O P �r . A a r o L 1e NNN ^I ..NN O � V r V . O O Oro O n . auo .. s. a � a Yo ap "Jn z M' o.. 4 Wa.� d .. r ui ..LN uo. -Nru L• °J +Y..�.O� r Onr ..J JWWS . pSd iu.63..Lr�O s •3 0 VJ p {Nyr s ri w <.ri Y u if iWrY 6 1� WpI p a J6 .O.I dp ifa�{ W 4r�6rWi . .. •.WSrj u°i > iiN irA{ Y. �. NOWOnP A� I ■ ': M—r •4. /�'A Ar'l1 i I � � & ~�- \ #g!� �SIT i „ /i/ !;!!! !� � ( g gh!\! ; ■� ■ |} �| [ { |� � ig •L3 v ,: �.: C';w �ti .;': :�F'': '..� - .. -yam •n. _ ;.� r.,' a -� �i'4_ „4 Y� sss ;� x ; s zs asg ass ass zsg zsssa s��in��a $es�= as$.sz$a =s$ @��ssa�a3�an$•� $� :;��, ,, 11.1.115"N11111” R \R \R tRt R!�Btj aP'e_Fg�$ PzPge sP� PaP2i=sS SS gg'r" EF #QFt��+ gg 7 v Nil taiiii` si' sisaiaa;' iiaiiiiii _'siiaa= �liJlsiia1iiijc ( ,° s'ssssssssssssssssssassi a Rpp sssss•s8css_sasasriy' iiia siiii' siisiai.*aiiiiF #isiiisisaE4t8i�i�y'fa G 3�Atl• .OSasartaaassaas as x.tiaaaa aaiaia /.azia •I in 3� si gig 99hiaiaaiowingiv gig i� r rrrrarrrrrrr= irr �. r. rrr rrrr rrr�rrr - ��' Q��E��iFi; FE�3t�iftil�3il �t6i 'fl�AtLtil�9�i�3s'L��T�IIICiFY e� rrrr- rr�rrrr� rrrr Fr:+�rrr r'i r�•r�rrr ..: �;_ r � ' Ea8n3E5§ Sidcn�EFi3��ili= tl�463 /F�ihBii'�5g1R�1r�i8a ci Eicassi_ sisisifi�i�ziii_' siisspap7t5 _'sra;la!¢E'.:P:i,',sa�.•i :s asssssssssissstissrassssislrasi .#SP*Bssasii a 'PPPQggFg Pas sP z FOzi 4p zf• ►LP PrP P 'e ■ ss $ a1EA7�il s�6�yEisBnSsaA 'aB5iCC3sr.'a §a...s►2i0 =..}as `- ,.. 13 i a ='s' fGas_+��ula =n ? '►. Ef" t<� ^�'6a�9$6 ^'cR'$ °7.itTzl$RS ^' Bi 3i?aia3:3 is$3�lii3c3cc�c�i= caa q ssiasasssss a 21 1; i i e iSS SSS aSSSS i a 14, S i S:S i SSas fe en�mSlxE33s � f�?3 °ABf= $FSS @= EOiEiRS?';E @E "cE�i 2CS E$9i'fif&t't'f E f$flfiSf£fR9f�`s5t$6$9ffiAff$xf fE[ ErI �',I�?��t�� &F @f i�3f� lEi�42f39�ff81'$5$93ffk3ff4df Y i • .-.- iJ 3.: 13:ii.:A• :i1.:: J.<iiir'ii.:.:.: .:J C SaiiaaEaiii O EiiiYatiiSiTiiiiiSSiiiYiiiiSiS� g '!I # ## # #i ### ## Q i dt ## #### # # # #f # # # ###! ## #INN U egi g 6i11£suii2i g sciedic #ssse:ciifsfiisic #seg ## `'! sassssssssx s YssaEaESisssiisassiassssasas#st _� I s3f ii61f3�i #i •. ^:9:1?.:: �:'3 ��= ��t� =••C CAL � ^___iii i�= ! - eq�f mympp gym_ �s�Pmn3 -nmm i irk Imi � $ DAP3�p��ea1S��Pi�losmt- ICHIMI i s e _nxsggn r=•__ se.: en s': � is asfii g siYiR #x #$a��i�$�sf'si�iF� /4 } 1 I := ;szagsEAs�3�� s33 s zssasEL,uIs net!tiE8 �b =w Uevna E>.zr aE »5l1c Sig=ra =xs zi5 net lM.,Giai P Es = • P irx E =YFcEc :•i'= =iiE 'EP 5 8_ -sstr s, -s i i i srsipsi s zpip Y i s.-$I x asssssssi.aaas assasssaass.s s sas {sssaassas,, •,'. isi3saiiiia3a }•s's_saPixx}sai_'s� all Sig jiosisilr y icsssaasa: s: sssasssassssass zssssaas :sasassaa: •r• rr. r rrr »�r�. rrrr�rr +rrr. rrF �+ reari3gaig 41F�� l6ig'iiSf53 °4igiil[Oisf'ag3�all rrrr -r — r•rrrrrrrrr rrr rrrrrr:•rr r: Fr��tl" I fi4519galY@ 9911 1 619' BitSi gEi�g3:Ya'sis'i1.l�lsli3ggi rr rrr err r rrr+ rrr••r.•r rrrrrrF r a` y = "3 139fii�4 }335bo� E ==E3E 6ni# a34 i$12f3$5�ii ' aipaii zpixagaaisaEi =IIa_'ts_'ajaiiii$E MAW x s sssz s. sassssasasassssssssFp:�snssisittpptpsssessssa�s t$E �'�P'aaso �'c? @c °ES E g3?18�8E$$ Ea8 a 3. ss3reaY' c5i. E3'?SnnE�s533- ata8s4ssin & =Egdsf °sE, IS a �s. a Imp a ? Ea Ki- Y :V SS Tom. I j .1|9 ||t �■ ■ 21 "� ©•, - gv3 #a. ee! ! , a' § | | || | §) | ||| § | |e §� .._. ! /m \ h3 I. S |7 ie tl q/ | k i R ! /�! ! a§ 444 2 q ■ | q2| |t||| q9 i 2 "it ; |¢:i $ ;! |k ; k |� , ! ..,�, . . ;!! § l•2, ! ! - =■ f � -� ! |t || §||| § § 0., 11 �� ■� . |!! Him , | ■ | ■ | || | �� ■o, | �!' |■ | ■� n! | |� || | | | | || ■ e ■ | || ! | || | |!U|§ | |! §§ ! p, | | | | | § | ■ | | ; ; |� | | || § || § 1Q | � | | � 17 ag aq � || , §' \| || Ot k A as \ \ §!` £ - � E , 'Un ,,, ;, ! |, | ;.l =! mEl'! | ,,•,, , , !f |f . zap aE q § ! &gifts , ■. ■.�-. ■ ! !. ■.� ■ |! ■|� ■ � � ,� || | | | | || | |!!§ | §||||$ | , ; | ■ ■|, . - - -• q ■ || 819111 || # | J | \|�| §| §!| \ �| | ■ | | ;| |; | §| | || || § | ; ■ | || & !§ ! � � ~ [ q q k - || • i � ! � � a» ! ! v ! � � || , §' \| || Ot k A as \ \ §!` £ - � E , 'Un ,,, ;, ! |, | ;.l =! mEl'! | ,,•,, , , !f |f . zap aE q § ! &gifts , ■. ■.�-. ■ ! !. ■.� ■ |! ■|� ■ � � ,� || | | | | || | |!!§ | §||||$ | , ; | ■ ■|, . - - -• q ■ || 819111 || # | J | \|�| §| §!| \ �| | ■ | | ;| |; | §| | || || § | ; ■ | || & !§ ! � � M: a.„, ":'+'_� ,'.d.±��yw�r±�: j.">S; "v.%:S/x°, „h='..�Y f_r.•” _ _ - .'�� - �';��_�'``' =?s =s�°iG :I �� •, 6 -mac Ij �a 11, lip, ,a� ° a YDDII 1fY 1nt ag � • . R k r n G ■ i b Otr7■ ■ ■ Y ra =1 G3 l jig `a s GGGii7 s @ @e � EP ? is w9 a d sa w z os ti a 's c .. a as a a _ z e+ w Up Vte-=� TM ]o. DOpw q *I ALahit bowtM C.W ) 3"m"w.CoM.ffala Tfan Bernardino OFF SA'Li BCLR Is M:S)L rwYnror Yw.A uuw.. qunw�N.t�yjo,Ilnvrwb Ar 7. NAAY.'S) Of AF"XAMN � +- o ANid rNor foc tqM cl TNwlw DAwr ittua es S Tym) Of T1fAt4WrX-o —i _ Uw n L Annual Paa 2�pmwjm .y Wy�.�to. �►r tM Smw Ip ot„ Suits A SM.i Nts 7. Am a Aw11y AIMoy Ol i fwonr /roe n-►A+Mo W S►, or O Uw;w f. Ma.o rqA owr Mon w twrbo� N • Wory7 t0. Maw 7w1 ore Yloiobi wY Hwrogo CuAd Aa a pfin I' Gploln • �=� Yrlrww/ b IiY1Oa f M 10 M M IVL111Zb Av Ash eN+thwuA dkh Ona M Mwwf ftrr N Ac4 aifFt 17. M1MIkpA eprM (4) 11er a7 AIOAA10 "'6i l 00.0 TGO.0�4 7Z.Gu TOTA1 1 1170.00 ►towl'o LdiM Us fw - - - .._ ..-. •• �•••• � b M rrolorw N M �' - N �o w..�. MA1kM1w N A Sgnrw, an 17. STATTI Of CAIUOMPLA Aiaolaik aorrrewe Cannot Aar, Caw" M „$gt term .gym ur.. -... w .- N.......,� ..... A.r....wu, o....--- .ILZG�&B._....__ M M h .rY14.r pwrrrl.y wnyt w h rrrl� N wry 111 wl N h ..aYr/.. r r. w M w1 rrwyy...a 1+w 4 w.aw wy y.�j �� rrrllnrNA �..��w Va ryr �w r h NAr /r IA 4 y yr wI .. l.. wawy+. y.r wr Mr r Y.iw n.rrr w ryr rw.Nwr. r .ralYrN �" MY w .wr•, rU hr r arr W nr h 4n� h .wJr wMYa.w r rwN Ywdr N wr rwr V .r'rAr h rrrrrn M . W r M f�aY r rr�r,rr w+'M y.r a +rMw h �F w .W rl. riynrr� rr ~a r/r h wMw•r. w h Pwr�,� ..r ...hr M YYwlrrr IA�iv y�.IwMO~ywr ��ry � ^ r w.MNN . wMr•.. w o rr rr wiwr .l .yy,.r r 14. AM)CAM ti SIGN K" .�.. APKW:AflOH BY TRANUM t!. STATE Q• CAUfO1MA CoIw1). Nom` +w .. wr N.rryy .w.r4. raO+.er wrlwA r w4.. w.aaw y rry ICI N y h Nrr r w r,rrws .4s J h r.tirw wr. Nrr I M� wren A.rrV./ MM. ti w hyN. wry y w�Y w.. w r qM Y y.M� �wwr.r r r.... MMrw.r w rya w �Ah+ .wM✓ r h 4wr. W V y � y�aMrr r N MNp� r Way ws ..ir! / w.a4nr...�rr W w.. M iwrwr.r .r w t..... ;,yy, & Nawo(d of Utomoo(J 11 i• Stnolwo!q si {'cp wM.! AZ � i •' ! 1• I 5 �aa5�� . t II 1 i � [d �• s I • ! i 1 i m � • i ^ 11 ! e ,S'Juu .�«..•.... »...r'...... rte.• t N ice` w � � � � 'V N �xrd I t : •1 M M M 9 9 ro o d , Dr it ) ! 6 .. N . r ;so•x'- _ -- :x.'= -;,�F+}S"r:.'-_cw3;�,a;.� �`�w, -�µl Vii._. C,rrY OF RADiCHO CUCAMONGA ` STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BY: Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: FPi0UF1XT FEASIBILITY SMY RECOMMOIDA1109: Approve bility Study as for participation --412 4 -028. �e Radio Frequrpg _ DACKGROWD• On Decmbe- 2, 1927, Counc'l granted approval for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to participate in the 800 Kri Radio Frequency Feasibility Study. The funding for the s'vdy was also approved from unallocated reserve. The purpose of this request is ram:y a technical qualification required for proper accounting of tho additional appropriation and subsequent c.'penditure. Respectfully subaitted, Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH:ES:cv r• ■ XL `is: a Recomxandation: It is the recommendatior of the Park and Racrsatidn- Commission to the City Council that the park site located on Peron, just vest of Turner, in the North Town Area be named Old Town Park. Background: The Park and Recreation Commission, at their November 19, 198 /, meeting auggewced that the North Town Community Task Force develop a list of suitable nanes for the park site to be located on Peron, west of Turner. This task force has vorkod closely with the City in developing the conceptual design for tho park site located in the North Town Area. Of those names suggested by the Community, the Park rnd Recreation Commission feels that the name Old Town Park is a desirablw name for this park in particular, reflecting the haritage of the North Town Community. D3 C� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT, Data: February 3, 1988 W/ :b: The City Cotu%cll and City Manager Proms Bob Rizzo, Assistant City Manager By: Raran McGuire - Emery, Associate Park Planner Subjects The Naming of the Park Site Located in the North Toun Area Recomxandation: It is the recommendatior of the Park and Racrsatidn- Commission to the City Council that the park site located on Peron, just vest of Turner, in the North Town Area be named Old Town Park. Background: The Park and Recreation Commission, at their November 19, 198 /, meeting auggewced that the North Town Community Task Force develop a list of suitable nanes for the park site to be located on Peron, west of Turner. This task force has vorkod closely with the City in developing the conceptual design for tho park site located in the North Town Area. Of those names suggested by the Community, the Park rnd Recreation Commission feels that the name Old Town Park is a desirablw name for this park in particular, reflecting the haritage of the North Town Community. D3 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT f� o Dates February 2, 1988 To: Mayor, Members of City Council, and city Manager From: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager By: Devs laonard, Park Project coordinator Subject: Naas for Beryl Paris Extension The Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City council authorize the renaming of Beryl Park to "Beryl Park East" and name the ten acre expansion to the facility "Beryl Park west ". BACRCROUND: By City council action on -August 20,1986, a conceptual design for the expansion of the existing Beryl Park facility west towards Carnelian Street was approved. The approximate tan (10) acre addition (see attached) will include two lighted soccer fields, picnic facilitioa, children play area, tolleyball and hard court area, exercise trail end stations, parking and restroom facilities. On August 10, 1987, Council authorized the selection of a landscape architect to develop working drawings to construct the previously approved conceptual design. The development: of the working drawings is currently approximately sot complete. Towards the ultimate and of completicn of the proje ^.t, the Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the project for a name for the expansion portion. To avoid potential confusion with a singular designated name the Commission recommends the name for the existing facility be changed to "Beryl Park East" and the expansion towards Carnalian Street be named "Beryl Park west ". RMVDL,bs 07 J4 rni no s. O O C4 D Gay OF RA,iGHO CUGAMONZA STAF F IVEPOUT • w• a Pi L bruary 3, 1968 atos and City Hanger Tos HaYor. Members of cl':y Council, Robert A. Rizzo, Asalstrnt City Y.antBer Props ect Coordinator Bys Dave Leonard, park lroj Subject; Hiseion Grove olive 'r :eas City Council authorized the boxir-g, storage o, ive trees from the formar w labor comp as requaata. the Historic and rreltoc ation of three mature ast ' the Park and who Hission Comuiee•on and secomm• planted in. a Froselvttion ssion. l'u�et, A.he ark rat ethe, corner of Recreation Comma Cemmun ty D future Terra vista Plan Church and Elm Streets Parkw that Ccmncil a::- horiz® that Park o be named "Le Cemm•Llity is Lccate3 'Within the Terru Vista Plan a, The cams grovZo�Of thirty' two olive trees. The t' Hiesf cn the remains of a farm labor camp referred to as worked vs.a utilized to a during *.hee1920'sorY.ed s;tta :.veal •ineyardn who stlrting ,.�•q,sested, that as reserved to cwerveaoratte1 he. �t}he The Historic Preaorvation Co=issioss ae many of the olive trees be preserved it trees t0 be camp and the vineyard iCommiss ark at the earner of cam] is preservation COf�IIiA vistao P res the w tieoion located in a P Po Church Street and P+m Averue vtsi'tb would be name fl La Park ( sest of 9:ssion raviewtheiteJanuary 21, The Fark s.nd P.ocreation Com by RnaBP the Historic Preserve sCommissions disrussed a atuVnlley Crest tion 1988 meeting. it B) and n cost estimate by tha Park and As! ( Based on the informationoi ive trees be trees (Exhibit C). three (3) trees are not Recreation Commisoion recommends stand of store the (reaerveed based on l'conditiont 2.) to move and 9 ,002 00 in a desirable will coat +/' tree3 with a gunrnntoo of survival, cost of $2,600.00 to 'Wh4ch is ex`•remely high based on a ollve tree. The 1 purcbaoe r comeroiially field grown representative o"Pleaof Recreation COmmiealan aug9 owls trees to three trees could be combs :ad with commercial grown W, L create the desire effect-the Historic Preservation commission has requested. Should City Council-slact,to-save the trace, a funding source must also be authorised.'. rAwis-Hoxsz't'w-q agreed to donate $5,000.00 tovards-the $22,500.06 cost of relocation. This leaves the deficit of,$17,500.00 which Cbuncil must authorize and increase appropriation from unallocatad, fund balaficie of account number '0l= 4532-G02#'Iit'Ccr-%ncil desires to save the trees. P.MVDLIbs fill 13 Ell t� 4I n � ox Ezhlblt'A' ;?8 V \ LL r c " A Tme i.. LarklVA" Corer' ASSOCIATES REPORT FOR SHARON HICKOE ASST. PURR PLANNER OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIC TREES LOCATED AT: MISSION CAM2 TERRA VISTA PARE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDI9G PREPARED BY: SAMUEL L. ENAPP• A.S.C.P.. ENAPP ASSOCIATES Exhlbft :8' RhvniE8 714MOS6343 FurAttm 71AM478411 Pot, Office &tt =6 PAvrWq Ca tomfa 92513 a9 _r 'S :3 s Re: Observations and recommendations of Olive trees within Mission Camp for relocation purposes. ' There are a total of thirty- two(32) Olive treec planted in a foreal grid pdttertt. The trees have struggled for survival with the vicissitides of nature and people pressure or vandalism. % total of thirteen(13) sees ware identified' and selected from the grove as the best specimens to relocate. The criteria for preservations of treas involves a multi -step process of identifying the trunk condition, growth r&tms* structure, presence of insects and disease, crown development, and most important, the life expectancy. More indepth this would take into consideration r,. • the foliage, color, density, and size, with the new growth, consid- eration must be given to the apparance of buds i.e. color, size, and shape. The sunk concerns are thu cavitiva, callousing, extent of wood decay, and mechari ^_al injuries. An inspection of the root system would chec+ fo: color location, and root flare. The overall visual health of the trees is averaga, but vitality testing confirmed tae trees energy storage capacity was ample with respect to energy need for relocation. See graph on page 3 (1) 20 - !. in my opinion the most prudent method of relocation would be to ball and burlap the trees and place then. in their permanent location. s -, The .gees could be placed in a holding or storage area and then moved into a permanent location, but this process would n ^t be reconmended due to the shock and stress of relocation twice. i Boxing would be another alternative to elimira•4 the shock ^f moving twice. Boxing would be the most expensive, but would allow for - storage and transportation. CQncluslon 4 In my opinion, the most appropriate method for relocation would 3 be to ball and burlap the trees. This would insure a good surviv:.l t rate and lower the costs in the relocation process. The approx mute b price for ball and burlap would be $4,000.00, and for boxing the price would be $ 10,0,30.00, this is a per tree price. Actual Ldentif: cation of the irrigation type and schedules, soil fertility, percolation tests, amount and type of organic material, fertilization, soil conditioning requirements, specific tree prur..ng, and tree relocation specificatiGns would require additional site inspectionp to inv•-are an accurate representation. Samuel L. An46p. A.S.C.A. consulting .irborist (2) 11 :A � a 6 a I 1,' 3w- I 3 r f, N T in J r� �` a•c+ 11, F 1Li J �•,�'; I' I 1,' 3w- I 3 r f, N T in J r� �` a•c+ 11, F 1Li J �•,�'; y� 1 ui& m Vr naivt.nV 1,UI.A➢1V14L1A MEMORANDUM December 17, 1987 v Park and Recreation commission Sharon Hickok, Assistant Park Planner "La Hiarion" olive Trees (Supplemental Into.) The following information was obtained from Valley Crest Trees in regard to boxing and moving the olive trees at the "La Hission" nits. All trees will be boxed in 108" boxes. 5 trees to be boxed and located for storage $5,374.00 ea. - 8 trees ballad and burlap (no guarantee)* 3,200.00 ea. 8 t- sea replanted at new site (approc. 7 mi.) 2,100.00 ea. *8 trees to be boxed and replanted at new nits 7,460.00 ea. (does include 1 year guarantee, exclusive of maint. valley Crest does not recommend the balled and burlap method.) Prodedurs: 1) Prone and thin, 2) Zkcavate around tree, 3)eideboards, 4) tunneling, 5) loading, 6) moving, 7) replant or drop off. Note: Valley crest will require width variance permits from the city when moving the trees. Also, They will need two months prior notice for scheduling the project. 5 trees 0 $5,375.00 oa $26,875.00 8 ':roes 0 7,460.00 ea .!9.680.00 (Boxed) Total $86,555.00 Includes guarantee 5 trees 0 $5,375.00 ea $26,875.00 8 trees 0 5,300.00 as 42.400.00 (Balled and Burlaped) Total 69,275.00 No guarantee Jim Borer - Valley Crest Trees (714) 240 -3321 San Juan Capistrano I E1 h 1.,C -'E �tr 9 Date: To: From: Subject: y� 1 ui& m Vr naivt.nV 1,UI.A➢1V14L1A MEMORANDUM December 17, 1987 v Park and Recreation commission Sharon Hickok, Assistant Park Planner "La Hiarion" olive Trees (Supplemental Into.) The following information was obtained from Valley Crest Trees in regard to boxing and moving the olive trees at the "La Hission" nits. All trees will be boxed in 108" boxes. 5 trees to be boxed and located for storage $5,374.00 ea. - 8 trees ballad and burlap (no guarantee)* 3,200.00 ea. 8 t- sea replanted at new site (approc. 7 mi.) 2,100.00 ea. *8 trees to be boxed and replanted at new nits 7,460.00 ea. (does include 1 year guarantee, exclusive of maint. valley Crest does not recommend the balled and burlap method.) Prodedurs: 1) Prone and thin, 2) Zkcavate around tree, 3)eideboards, 4) tunneling, 5) loading, 6) moving, 7) replant or drop off. Note: Valley crest will require width variance permits from the city when moving the trees. Also, They will need two months prior notice for scheduling the project. 5 trees 0 $5,375.00 oa $26,875.00 8 ':roes 0 7,460.00 ea .!9.680.00 (Boxed) Total $86,555.00 Includes guarantee 5 trees 0 $5,375.00 ea $26,875.00 8 trees 0 5,300.00 as 42.400.00 (Balled and Burlaped) Total 69,275.00 No guarantee Jim Borer - Valley Crest Trees (714) 240 -3321 San Juan Capistrano I E1 h 1.,C -'E — MY OF RANCHO CUC OIONGA STAFF REPORT Date: February 3, 1998 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell it. Maguire, City Engineer By: Blane M. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer Suoject: Approval to Award and Execute Professional : iervices Agreement to prepare plans and contract documents fer White Alder lree Removals in Tract 11934 (Victoria ,Planned Community) to RJM Design Group. The amount not to ercead 55,000.00 is to be funded from Landscape Maintenance District Mo. 2 with a loan from the Beautification Fund RECOlIEN011TIDM� .- _,.. ,. City Council approval to award a Professional Services Agreement for White Alder Tree Reanvals in Tract 11934 (Victoria Planr,ed Community) to ,2JM Design Group for an amount not to exceed $5,000.00 co be funded from Landscape Maintenance District M0. 2 with a loan from the Beautification Fund and to authorize staff to execute Agreement theref,n•. BACKGRGUID /A LYSIS• Acting upon City Council directive, a proposal to prepare plans and construction contract documents has teen solicited. Due to the contract amount and the familiarity of the RJN Design Group, is single proposal has been obtained from the same. It is staff's recommendation therefore, that the RJM Design Group be engaged by a Professional Services Agreement on an hourly contract not to exceed $5,000.07. The contract amount shall be raid for from Landscape Maintenance District Mo. 2 with a loan from the Beautification Fund. The contract amount of $5,000.00 is within the range authorized by Council for execution by staff. Copies of the Agreementq are attached. Respectfully .s ubm t ed. RM4:8WF:pam Attachment v. Bu, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGAEERM This Agranent is made and ent4r4 into this uy "- Of 19 between the City of Rancho Cucaawnga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY') and RJN resign Group, Inc. (hers'nafter referred to as - CONSULTANT -). r A. Recitals. (i) CITY has heretofore issued iU Request for Proposal pertaining to the perforssance of professional services with respect to the preparation of Landscape construction drawings for street tree removal and replacement in Victoria Tract 11934 (- Project' hereafter). (ii) CONSULTANT has now submitUd its proposal for tha perfarmar:ce of such services. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSIR.TANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assists - • to CITY, CITY's Planning COeINission. City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perfore such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NOV. THSREFURE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. I. Definitions: The following definitions sha!l apply to the following tees, except where th' .Ontext of this Agreement otherwise requires: (a) project: The preparation of Landsrape construction -1- 35 4 drawings for ttraet troe removal and reolaeemint in ILtoria Tract 11934 described in Exhibit 'A' Scope Of Servicez hereto including, bat not limited to, the preparatice of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, boUl O NI and in wrltlnr, of scch plans. Pips, surveys, sports Y and documents to CITY As requirod and attendance 4t any and al's wort tassizns, public hearings and othor mmatings corductad by CITY :dth respect to the project as outlired in the Scope of Services. (b) Services: Such professional services to are natessary to be p3rfo-2ed by CONSULTANT in order to complata tba nroject. (c) COepletior. of Prujoct: The date of completion of all phases cf the project, including any end all procedures, davelopaant plans, cups, surveys, plan SOcuarsnts, technical reports, meetings, Ora: presentations and attendance ey CON%1.TANT a. w'iblic hearings regarMng the project acceptance fir constrw.tion is set forth in Exhibit "C' Project Schedule attAched hereto. 2. CONaId.TANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSUITANT shall fort Mth Lutdertake and cos(rlete the yroject in accardanrn with Exhibit 'q" and a ;pli :able with Federal, State and CITY statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to tie reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports plans and documents Otrainafter collectively referred to as 'docuaarts ") in;luding 411 suppleeental tachntgal docwents, as described in Exhibit "A" to CITY within the time spectfied in Project 14heduled. Exhibit 08" Copies of the documents shall ba In su:h numirars as are required by Exhibit "A'. CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSL TANT cc vents .E. —q(0 ! regardin0 said documents and CONSULTANT saall thereafter make such revisions to said docusants as are deearad nacessary. CITY shall receive revised i; documents in such form and in the quantities deterslned nacessary by CITY. A The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon :y i' a written approval of CITY. S (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's Seto cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in 0e opinion of" i CONSULTANT, be necessary to rouply with the term of this Agreement. In the cu event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hercoy warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services y r required Mreunder. CONSULTANT further agrees thft no subcontractor shall be reulned by CONSULTANT except rpm the prior written approval of CITY. (d) CONSULTANT shall, at CW4TANT'S rate cost and expense, secure the required issuance of a City Business License as a condition precedent to being engaged as a CONSULTANT within the CITY. J. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a mextaaa sum of sS,000.00 for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sus shall co. %-r the cost of all staff time and all other direct anJ indirect costs or fees, including the wort of teploytes, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. PAlWnt to rONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made iu accordanco with the schedule set forth in Exhibit 'B•. -3- 37 IN) Payments to COMILTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSI)LTANT, an a monthly bash, and such invoices Mali be paid within a reasonable tin after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall bo detailed in Exhibit 'C' either with respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed 9$f of individual task totals descrfbed in Exhibits 'e'. t (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required m pay to CONSULTANT any am in excess of 93% of the maximum payab)a hereunder prior tc receipt by CITY of all final documents, togatbe; ir(fK all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final payment shall be wade not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents " accepttn;e thereof by CITY. (d) additional services: Panetta for additional services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit •A' hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance wit! the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 'C'. Charges for addittonal screfees shat) ba invoiced on a monthly tests and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. Requested additional services UP to an amount not to exceed ten percent (l,.f) of the contract%mcunt my no author M by the City Engineer. Additional services exceeding this amount rqulre authorization by the City Council. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit 'A' hereto. 3 (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other .a 31a ` information, if available, wh'ch CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to complete the project. (c) Such fnforeaticn as is generally available from CITY files applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necesse,. In obtafntn0 information from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. Nowwer, it shall bo CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all fuitlal contact with respect tb the gathering of such information. 5. Ownership of Documents: Ali documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photogr%phs and reports prepared b'y COMMLTAIT pursuant to this Agroamant shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or rouse of the plans and specifications except at the site lntendeo or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at t4 sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses 'ncluding defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination: This agreewnt soy be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the -5- 39 I x 5 a G i rd 5 A i event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit 'C', on a pro- rate basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than tho maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all aocmamts, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, sodels, photographs am reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of data of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all + notices, demands, involcet and writtan communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible far the performance by the parties under this Agrecoent: CITY: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer, P.O. Box 807. Rancho Cucamonga. CA 11130 CONSULTANT: Robart J. Nueting for RJH Design Group, Inc., 27285 Las Ramblas, Suite 250. Mission Viejo, CA 92691 -6325 Any such notices, demarvis, invoices and wrftten communications, by mail, shall be deescd to have bee- received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours aftrr deposit thereof fr. the United States sail, postage prepaid and properly addrested as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONS!ILTAJIT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunier in a camper or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSbL,NHT allow any subcontractor to cormtnce work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor nas been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out snd -6- YO r�� 1 maintain at all times during the tera of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Norker's Comoensstiom Insurance: Beim beginning Work. CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITf a certificate of Insurance as proof thst it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in ctrrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. w In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code i' Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of coppensation to his ' eEployess. CONSULTANT prior to tommencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certidication as follows: 'I am aware of the provisions of Section 3 -JO of the Labor Code which require every esploysr to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in hccordarce with the provisions of that Cooe, and I will Comply with such provisions before commencing the perforrarre of the work of this Agreement'. (b) F_uhlic Liability and property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, At CONSULTANT's $olo east and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benef t of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad fors, ge,eral pcbllc liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of at least One Miliion Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any ono accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars (Si,000,000.00i for property damage. (c) Errors acd Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or polices of insurance concerning errors and omissions (' malorictice') providing protection of at least (250,000.00 for errors and omissions ('malpractice') with respect to loss arising from actions of a CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance W required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of Calf fornia and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall new as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees; arid— agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extant obtainable, to the affect that (1) the insurer rives the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, etployees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except attar thirty (30) days notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon r -cefpt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indeanification: CONSULTANT shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend CITT, Its elected and appointed officials, officers, and employees against any and all injury, loss or damage arising out of the acts, errors or omissions for which tho Consultant maybe legally liable in the performance of professional services hereunder. (Dated: November 10, 1981) 10. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in -8- Va part, by COgMLTf:.T without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereW agree that CDHWLTANT and its employers, officers and agents are Independent contractors under this Agreesent and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. a2. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed In accordance with the taws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: In the event ary legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any tan or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party In said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attornrys' fees and costa from the opposing park/ in an amount determined by the Caurt to be reasonable. 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either rral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter heroin. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. w _g. J13 o: IN WITNESS WHMEOF, the parties hereto "a executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: CO(NSU;,W RJH Design Group. Inc. Data: 4 p er � . ae ng CITY OF RA Date: cnn s ar '— RECOMONMED FOR APPROYAL Date:` usse H. hagu re City Engineer ATTEST: every A. Autnelet. e -ID- Approved as in faro: - City Attorney a i EXHIBIT 'A' SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULTANT SHALL: 1) Accurately determine the nutter and locations of street trees to be remeved (Alders) based cn field review. 2) Provide an estimate of cost. 3) Prepare demolition and planting plans with details (construction documents). 4) Prepare specifications suitable for incorporation into City bid documents. CITY SHALL: Hake available are plan; or reference mater;al necessary to assist in the completion of the Scope of Services. Select replacement tree species. ITEMS OF WORK NOT INCLUDED A. All items not specifically identified in ths' Scope of Work or otherwise addressed herein are not included in this proposal. B. Coordination with utility companies. C. All survey information shall be provided by the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following items shall not be a part of tha fee identified in the payment saction above, but shall be reimbursable to RJM DESIGN MOUP as follows: L. Agricultural soils suitability tests at cost plus 155. 2. A11 peInting, reproduction and delivery charges will be invoiced directly by tAe venders to you. Should we incur these reimbursable expenses, we will invoice them to you at direct cost plus 15% fcr handling. _11_ A 1 0 1 EXHIBIT •B° 3 SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION OF NJRII CDMPLETIDN TINE AFTER AUTHORIZED 1) Determine tree locations and quantittes 1 weak 2) Estimate Cost 1 weak 3) Preparation of construction docuaant 3 weeks 4) Specification preparation 3 weeks 1 EXHIBIT 'C' STANDARD FEE SUCOULE FOR r TIME AND Y.ATERIALS !AD COUTRW EXTERS k09H vxr lase. Sil1ELT TREE WMAL M RE MENVIT The Client agrees to pap Consultant as compensation for all work included in the Seoya of Work section and authorized contract extension or additional work not included In the Scope of Mork heretofore stated at the hourly rates below. -cam STANDARD iN1URLT FEE SCMIEDUI.E Landscape Architect $ 70.00 per hour Designer Draftsperson f 60.00 per hour f 46.00 per hour Field Observation S 70.00 per hour Word Processor Irrfgstion Dosignor S 26.00 per hour S 70.00 per hour Billings for alb Lieu and materials and contract eximnsinn work shall be i- accordtInce with the level of writ performed and will be broken into the categories listed above. All extra work must be accompanied by a Purchase Order. Estimated faes quolvd for the services to be performed as set forth in the Scope of Wont, all contract extensions, additional work, and the Standard Hourly fees ahoy* are subject to adjustments in accordance with any incre ases in the Consumer's Price Index or other mutually agreed upon cost index. Thiu increase shall apply to that portion of the work yet m be performed as of the da.e of increase, The first data of aqy escalation for this agrenmt shall be August 1, 1988, and will be escalated each year thereafter. y7 e. �l 3 a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineeriag Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 12902, located at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Almond Street, submitted by Nordic Woods II Limited, a California Limited Partnership RECOMP(aDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 12962, accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS /BACKG.ROUNO Tract 12902, located at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Almond Street, in the Yerr' Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on April 23, 1966, for the division of 40 acres into 29 lots. The Developer, Nordic Woods II Limited, a California Limited Partnership, is 5L.mitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faitnful Performance Bond: $310,000 Labor and Material Bond: $155,000 Monumentation Bond $ 3,850 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. The map is approved subject to preparation of the Engineer's Report segregating assessments under the Improvement ;ond Act of 1915. r W. CCSR FEBRUARY 3, 1988 PAGE 2 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Hater District. C.C.&R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. jgspectfu��st¢rott +� DsP..Tr Ile RRM:LB:sd Attachments s 5 �M RESOLUTION NO. S8 -0 141 -J A RW..J7ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C= MOhGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 12902 WHEREAS, the Tentative Ivy of Tract No. 12902, consisting of 29 lots, ubmitted by Nord" Moods It Limited, a California Limited Partnership, Subdivider, located on the south•.ieut cornea of Hermose-Avenue and Almond Street, has been submitted to the City of wicho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision ►lar Act of the State of California, and in ceepliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 -of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submitf•`for -- approve said Final Nap offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Louncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, is follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and thq Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City end the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to fora and centen• thereof by the City Attorney; zrd 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the C1t;, Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on beha,f cf said City. Y ■i INS! PARCEL I PAFCEI 0 1 I I - +I •oNe� ��;- -J + n -,- RIMAJOIDER = G�R[l � T o Z. i T + .r Y:• i i1U U zs I f i z ,= za :s ! _ I r a I •TT4IR z0 19 'TtwYMf to „ to Is —� M j I{ Is 12 I r h O �4 7 B 9 10 11 — Ao�arr eau.r 1 s 4 n 1 ;" r Ci TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA T ;INEMUNG Dme10:1 � L• �.1]��Dflh[.AIR r =: Tae i IZ9d2 7 f 7. i r s I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician ` SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for a TrAfffc Signal, located at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Baseline Road, submitted by Lewis Hones of California. TION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROCNO Tract 12671, located at the sout:wst corner of Milliken Averwa and Terra Vista Parkway. in the Terra Vista Planned Community, was approved by the Planning CoW ssion on August 26, 1986. The City Council, at the January 6, 1968, meting, directed the Planning C- msission to hold a public hearing for the pupose of considering a modification to the conditions of approval for Tract 12671, to require the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Base Line and Milliken Avenue. The Planning Commission, at the January 27, 1988, meeting, approved said modification and the developer, Lewis Hones of California, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of said traffic signal In the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5100,060 Labor and Material Bond: $ 50,000 copies of the dgreeaent and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, RHM:LB:jh Attachments 7� C 1� ON F V 3' i� RESOLUTION k0. $8 -OLO A PESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIiY OF iuWCHO' CUCAMONGA. CALI FORMA 'APPROVINO. IMPROVEMENT *AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SEr,URfTY FOR,A:TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT 111E INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AY:NUE PND BASE LINE'ROAD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its cons aderation.an Improverdnt January 27, 1988, by Lewis Noes of California as'Ceve ?o7er, for the installation of a trsffic signal at the intersection of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in ^1d Improvement Agreement and subject to the torts thereof, is to be done in conjunction with tho developrent of said real property as referred to Tentative Tract 12571; and V;EREAS, stid Improvement Agreement ii secured and ,tccomparied by " good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is ldentifiea In said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security to and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ••fie t i t ��j WA Crr1 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner ral SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 RL - nurtb: - me appeal or the Planning m ss on ec son cndfffonally approving the development of an 8.2 acre integrated shopping center consisting of four (4) retail buildings totaling 87,581 square Feet in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - APN 208 - 261 -59:-- I. RECOf4lENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the a ac a wso ution approving Conditional Use Permit 87 -16 and making findings in support thereof. IT. BACKGROUND: At the regular meeting of January 20, 1988, the City t—oun-c -f conducted a public hearing to consider this project and receive public testimony. The City Council's deliberation focused upon mitigaticn measures an such issues as drainage on Hellman and Helms Avenues, tha traffic impact on Helms Avenue, the bufftr zone at the rear of the project site, the trash enclosure, and security. The City Council determineJ that additional mitigation measures could be aided to further reduce the potential impacts. Mitigation measures discussed included landscaping to the rear elevation of the main building, special design for the trash enclosure areas to address the residents concerns, limiting he hours for refuse collection, limiting the hours of business operation, tightening the requirements for security patrol, etc. The City Council directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval reflectin3 these added mitigation measures. The City Council also directed staff to obtain comments from the Foothill Fire District and Sheriff's Department regarding the issue of adding security gates. Staff nas contacted the apppropriate staff person in the Sheriff's Department and the Foothill Fire District. Captain Nark Grisamore of the Foothill Fire District stated that any security gates would be acceptable if Ynox boxes are provided. Also. Captain Gene Gillmore of the Sheriff's Department stated that oatroling the site would not be a problem with security gates that have knox boxes. S5 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -16 - NUWEST February 3, 1988 Page 2 P Attached for your review is the Resolution of Approval with the added wtitlgatl,zn maasuros. Also, a full transcript of the January 20, 1988 public hearing is included in your report. j an ect ful y su Coleman Senior Planner OC:NF:te Attachments: Public Nearing Transcript Resolution,of9ApprovalCouncll Staff Report t c� CITY OF RANCHO CLTCA?dONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIOiAL USE PERMIT 117 -16 — NOGE5T - The appeal or e ann ngi g Commiss— sione21•sTon con anally approving the development of an 8.2 acre integrated shopping center consisting of four (4) retsll buildings totalino 87,581 square feet in the Coomnity Commercial (CC) District, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hallman Avenue - APR 208-261-Se- I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of Conditional se Permit 87 -16. II. BACKGROUND: The site area has a long hlstorl in development propose s. In October of 1983, the Planning Commission approved a 91,200 square foot shopping center including a supermarket and a Tac: Bell fast food restaurant. The Planning Commission, in reviewing the time extension for this Conditional Use Permit in April, 1985, expressed concern that this master planned shopping center did not provide the required pedestrian and plaza amenities consistent with the Ct• policies. The owner /developer at that time (Lewis Homes) revised the master plan by providing such amenities as continuous pedestrian connections, plaza areas, benches, seating area, klosk, etc. to address the concerns of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission to August of 1985 reviewed tnls revised master plan anJ approved the modification to this Conditional Use Permit including the time extension. Attached for your reference are Exhibits 'F' and 'G' showing the previously approved and the modified master plan for the shopping center. Since then, the City adopted the Foothill Boulevard Interim Policies in October of 1986 while the CUP had expired in April of 1986. Lewis Homes, the previous property owner, sold this site to Nuwest who later had received a preliminary review from the Planning Commission to determine the consistency of their prcposad project with the Interim Policies in February, 1987. The project was formally submitted in April, 1987. Exhibit 'A' is a chronology of events for this project. 57 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONUITIONAL "SE PERMIT 87 -16 - NUWEST January 23, .988 Page 2 III. ANALYSIS: In reviewing the proposed project, the Planning rBWT?sibn received public testimony from several residents in the surrounding area and also considered facts and evidence from the written and oral staff reports. The Commission report Is attached as Exhibit 'E'. The following section summarizes their considerations. A. Site Constraints: The Planning Commission recognized that ere are several site constraints that affect the design of the site plan. 1. The site has three street frontages, whereas, most shopping centers are located at a corner bounded by only two street frontages. Traditionally, the service area is oriented towards the rear of the property and away from the street view which is the; case for this project. 2. fie site is designated as in a flood zoie. Hellman Avenue is historically a water - carrying street where excess surface water had reached the single family residences to the south in the past. This constraint would effect the grading concept for the site Arty would establish the required pad elevation to enaur, that surface water drains towards Hellman Avemie The existing single family homes to t1.e south "cro graded in such a way that those homes abutting the middle of this project are substantially lower than homes on the east and rest sides. The developer wculd have to take these existing grades into consideration in designing the required buffer zone. 3. The Foothill Specific Plan calls for a median island with predesignated median breaks. Ona of the goals in the Specific Plan is to deal effectively with the traffic and safety problems along Foothill Boulevard. In doing so, a raised medirn island will be established and access points will be limited along Foothill Boulevard to maintain the highest level of service for the roadway. Median breaks will occur at the Hellman Avenue and Helms Avenue intersections. Therefore, the project would be restricted to right -turn only access onto Foothill Boulevard. Project access would also be from Hellman Avenue and Helms Avenue. The existing driveway for Taco Bell would be eliminated. B. Heighbcrhood Meetings: A total of four neighborhood meetings were a ei se meetings yer• held to inform and involve the residents early in the review process. =! 62 CITY COUNCIL ST.WF REPORT CONDITIONAL•USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NL'vEST January 20, 1988 Page 3 1. July 1987 - At this meeting, the deteloper presented e pro ect to the residents who provided feedback by raising concerns and impacts on areas of security, safety hazards, noise impact, traffic impact, visua, and privacy Impacts. Some of the discussions between the developer and the residents involved proposing mitigation measures for the buffer zone which included raising the perimeter block wall to 6 feet, dense landscaping with thorny vines to disrouragc anyone from climbing over th- yall, eliminating one of the most southerly driveways off Helms Avenue to avoid througt- traffic, and installing speed bumps to slew surface traffic. 2. Se_pt�1987 - At this meeting, the developer presen a f6e— mitigation measures which have been •- :,,,,,,,,;.,. incorporated into the project, to address t11r concerns of the residents. Residents at the meeting J, stated that those mitigation measures were inadequate and would like to see an alternative site plan mfitdm - eliminated the service drive in the back. 3. October 1987 - On October 26, 1987, staff conducted an informal -meeting between the residents that abut the site immediately to the south and the developer, The final design and treatment of the buffer zone at the south property boundary was presented to these residents as they are the most Impacted by this project. Staff also invited a member of the Sheriff's Department to attend this meeting to answer questions regarding the issue of crime and safety. The residents reviewed the buffer zone treatment but did not have any consensus as to its adequacy in meting their concerns. A detailed description of each meeting is included to the December 9, 1987 Planning Commission staff report. 4. December 1987 - The last neighborhood meeting was held on Dec er 4, 1987, just prior to the Planning Commission meeting. The developer presented to the residents the reasons for having chosen the site plan as proposed. The developer stated tnet other alternative site plans have been considered, however, they weren't chosen because those site plan designs were not feasible for a viable commercial center. Exhibit 'C' 1s a detailed description of each of the alternative site plans studied by the developer prior to choosing this one. 59 -•- CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NUNEST r January 20, 1988 t Page 4 " C. The Identified Potential Adverse Impacts and the Proposed ga on easures. The following is a suemary of each of tie potential adverse impacts and the proposed mitigation r_essures. A full description of each of the impacts and mitigation measures is included in the December 9, 1987 Planning Commission staff report. 1. Drainage Impact - The development of this project may expose peop a or properties to water related hazards such as flooding. Mitigation Measures o Install 190 foot catch basin on Foothill Boulevard. o Seventy -two inch pipe that connects south along _ Hellman Avenue. Result - Past problem of excess surface water tf oodfng the single family residences to the south. would be alleviated. Further, the City- scheduled capital improvement projects scheduled for completion within the next few years would further reduce the potential flooding along Hellman Avenue. 2. Traffic Im act - Increased traffic on Foothill ou eve . resident concerns with traffic along Helms Avenue. Mitigation Measures o Raised median island limited access off Foothill Boulevard. o A traffic signal ultimately will be installed at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Helms Avenue. o 'No truck traffic" signs could be posted along Helms Avenue. o The street is already posted for a speed limit of 25 riles per hour. Result - The raised median island with only one access off Foothill Boulevard would be able to move the traffic at on acceptable level. The installation of the "No lruI Traffi1c' s {gns andd the traffic signal at the 1nte�sectlon of Footh111 and Helms l would at trucks from using the route of Helms Avenue and Devon Street as a shortcut. Io0 g f CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NUNEST � January 20, 1988 e' Page 5 3. Nois almpact_ - Increased ►Ioise From Surface Activity - and Traffic Mitigation Measures o A time limitation of 7 a.m, to 9 p.m. for all surface and delivery activity. o Trash enclosure areas have been oriented away from the south property boundary. o Signs would be posted for 'Employee Parking Only" and also for No Overnight Parking Allowed' in the back service area. o A block wall along the south property boundary .: —. shall be designed to attenuate noise. The City's Municipal Coda requires that collection of refuse that is adjacent to a residential district not occur before 6 a.m. Result - The sursaatlon of all these mitigation measures would minimize the noise level 4. Light or Glare Impact Mitigation Measures o Light posts shall not exceed a maximum height of 15 feet measured from the finished grade. o All light fixtures shall have shields to prevent light from shining onto adjacent residences. o All lights shall be of high pressure sodium type (orange color) to reduce glare. Result - Any light or glare would be minimized, yet provide sufficient light for security purposes. S. Impact - Increase of Crime and Security Miti ation Measure - The developer is proposing to Hui a private security firm to patrol the site. Other mitigation measures as the installation of the block walls, landscaping, lights, sign posted for "no overnight parking', parking spaces designated for "employee parking only" and time limitations of r.. service delivery activity, will contribute to alleviating any potential Impact. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - 4UNEST January 20, 1988 Page 6 Result - The summation of all these mitigation measures would decrease the chances of crime. The Planning Commission reviewed all of these mitigation measures and determined that once they have been incorporated into the project, the identified impact would be minimized, rectified, compensated and alleviated. Thus, there would not be a significant impact as a result of this project. Therefore, the Planning Commission issued a Regatiw, Declaration for this project. Iv. CONCLUSION: Based on the above - mentioned site constraints, t!ie nppur -from the neighboring residents and the mitigation measures proposed, the Planning Commission found that: the proposed project is appropriate for this site; the proposed site plan design is the best alternative given the site constraints; and the mitigation.... measures offset the ivyact of development to the surrounding areas. Therefore, the Planning Commission conditionally approved this project. Copies of he Planning Commission staff report and minutes have been attached for ycur review. ResOly $ � nit ed, Bra e City Planner BB.NF:te Attachments: Exhibit "A' - Chronology of Events Exhibit '8" - Appeal Letter from Resident Exhibit "C" - December 4, 1987 Neighborhood Meeting Presentation From the Developer Exhibit "D' - Draft Minutes of December 9, 1987 Exhibit "E' - Planning Commission Staff Report of December 9, 1987 10� IN p g a7 s 113 it �'� f filIf _ J UH _ J It 11 711n�i�llllr 8' ' r 4 L ILI e I m I{� .µ 1Yj �Y� I I JI e I m I{� .µ 1Yj �Y� r � II oil �1 �I I 0 m t � I � t j ! J•I 'sr * n • � r � ra7 i A 1. �N 0 r r J' r h ; ��TI ._•�.11I• -� —_ � I y � • j1 •Irr Ij • b4 I J �ff SCREEN WALL ON I SET WALL C. (157ING WALL �` a CURS ARD MIER SECTION ° SCALE : 1' • 10' so• s• �o' IE%IST IIOUS E -a— AND 6U71EF � E %:ST WAIL SECTION "S•S" SCALE : I" f 10' cPrY c)F ( RANCHO CUCANKVs r ! RA>•r M MGM �Y ' l•1 I Ir i' -�iL V FF x92.9 s. F� f� VOKrH , EIEM, TmE,_fi FXHIMTt 94 SCALE _.".0 19't EXIST HOUSE EXIST. HOUSE F. \IXIST SHED SECT it SC k:!�p v- [ 70' CURB All GUTTER is - r" g, GLITTER SECTION "E -E" SCALE 1" 10" 1 10' I- S' 1 A.. 7O - _ .J 1` F. 73.SC 1 AGLITTER �PLA4TER CURB SECTION "F -F" { SCALE CITY OF mm, nt AN CUCAm4Gk mu, p6 PI ANNM DPAS7oN EXHW- -j Z,7,. SCAUE l ` I�� b$ .�•.n41gb ;ZrLf I AET. r r. - .SECTION • SCALE, 1" = 10 :i;� —,► :r _ 7eI i AIII r+L SECTION "N -V SCALE % 1's 101 SECTION "i -I to SCALE 11"+ 10' OF (i ��t L�� ►, 1 ��V 1 } �.� L yy7 .++ V {{ ' ��C //��J L ��L 11 r A l N G A �f- f- �� i rrEMI oIPB1 -c6 T��n��u�p��[� c- �/C1•iyrAl1 EXHIE � Jl.AU, 69 =- a & % a a Iv —n —n SCALE , I" , 10' 2.01 14003 we« szo3 ~- t , ---- SECTION L L . _... SCALE , 1' +10' 92" N.C.P. n�s.o • ■ SECTION "N - N" SCALE i :95. Mml cdf B1 -l6 Evitiar', SCALE, 70 t%, SECTION "a-all I. SCALE 1 r is —101 SECTION "R-R" SCALE t r' 1 m' CITY Of RANCHO C`LrAMoNGA P[AMM DrVISMI F.;. z 93.00 •73.00 vV o .\KXMi rrms W4 Trn,E, -- I. Wr -cecT,asr EXHM P-__9kSCALE l• " y7y, 12' 2 S' • , 'Q �, aJO � P.i. • 75.50 CS, i. r \ SECTION "P•P" I SCALE t 1" • 10' it' z5' m SECTION "a-all I. SCALE 1 r is —101 SECTION "R-R" SCALE t r' 1 m' CITY Of RANCHO C`LrAMoNGA P[AMM DrVISMI F.;. z 93.00 •73.00 vV o .\KXMi rrms W4 Trn,E, -- I. Wr -cecT,asr EXHM P-__9kSCALE i h 19th F � r z J uJ w r u� R Rlaw LL) -- 0 a z w of Y Q < d } crry OF RANCHD CUCAMONGA ' �, PL.ANi\ M rAvISON EXHIg -7;t c — — z' Ash L,IN CHL.IIRCH F004HILI_I _ 2 6th 4th v ✓V :VOR7'H SCALE -A ABSOLUTION NO. ft -oq3 A RBBOiAT20N 01 TIM CITY COUNCIL 07 THE CITY OF RkNCNO CUCAMONGA APPROVING COLDITIOrAu USN PERMIT 300. 87 -16 TO ALLOW TAM DB',7LOMMKT OF AN 8.2 AM X=(IRATED SHOPPING CENTER, CONSZSTIN0,07 YOUR MAIL BUILDIWOS TOTALING S7,SS1 5QU11P7 TEXT, 0W PROPERTY WITHIN THR IOOTNILL SPECIFIC PLAN, CONNONITY CONNaRCZAL DIETAICT, AML LOCATED ON rn soU'.xMT CORNER OF F0079ILL BOULNVARD MD EELLMAV AVBYUN IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA AND &AXING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (1) NO NEST COH?MRCIAL DEVELOPMENT COR *ORATION has filed an application for the issuance of a ConJitional Use Permit, No. 87 -16, as described in the title Of this resolution. Hereinafter in this resolution, the subject conditional.upe_,.,.. Permit request is referrad to as the "Application." (ii) on NOVramber 10, 1987, the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application and, at the request of adjacent residents and with the consent rf the applicant, continued the public hearing to December 9, 1987. (ilt) Following the conclusion of the continued public hoaring of December 9, 1987. the Plamling Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its Resolution No. 87 -211, thereby approving the Application subject to a!1 Conditions and Standard Conditions contalhea in said resolution. (iv) The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution No. 07 -211 was Vmsly appealed to this Council. (v; On January 20, 1988, this Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to such appeal e.-d concluded said hearing on that data. (vi) All logal prorequis,ttos to th,% adoption of this resolution have occurred. B. gasolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by Mw City Council Of the CAty I:e Rancho Cucamonga as follows: -73 aesoluticn No. Page Two 1. This council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Pcrt A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council boreby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the Env - onmental Quality Act of 1970. Further, this council hereby specifically finds that specific changes, alterations, or conditions of are have been incorporated In the project which mitigatQ or avoid all significant environmental impacts associated with the project and, farther, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 3. Eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during tha above- referenced January 20, 1908 public hearing, including written staff reports, public tostimony.,and. - the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 87 -211, this Council specifically finds as follows: a. The Application arrlies to vacant property within the Foothill Specific Plan, Community Commercial District, bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Hellman Avenue and Helms Avenue with a street frontage of 11535 feet and a lot depth of 612 feetr b. The property to thb north of the subject site is within the Foothill Specific Plan, Mixed Ups District, and is currently developed with a combination of a motel, mobilshome park, vacant land and single family homes. The property to the south of the subject vita is within the Low Residential District and is currently developed with dingle family homes. The property to the east of the subject site is located within the Foothill Specific Plan, Community Commercial District, and is developed with various commercial /retail buildings. The property to the west of the subject site is within the Medium -High Residential District and Low Residential District and is developed with a combination of apartmants and single family homasi c. The project contowl3lates the construction of an integrated shopping canter consisting of four retail buildings totaling 87,521 square feet on approximatei.y 8.2 acres of :and. Such a use as cantemplated conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is permissible with the approval of a Conditional We Permit within the Community commercial District of the Foothill Specific Plant 7Y Resolution No. Page Three x d. The development as proposed in the Application will not contradict the goals and objectives of either the Foothill specific Plan or the Development code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, will be well integrated and compatible with the uses in the immediate vicinity of the subject site and will not promote a detrimental condition to persons or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject site. More specifically, the design and improvements contemplated in the Application will be appropriate to the specific proposed location for the following reasons: (i) with the required installation of a 190 foot catch basin on roothlll Boulevard and a 72 inch pipe to connect south along Hellman Avenue, the development of the site will alleviate past problems of excessive surface water flooding to the single family residents to the south of the subject,_ait:. Surface water run -off from the structures and parking areas of the subject site are designed to flow towards Hellman Avenue and any such surface water run -off will be inconsequential in comparison to the capacity for water run -off on Hollr_:n Avenue; (11) The development of the project pursuant to the application will not result in a confusing or dangerous traffic circulation pattern on Foothill Boulevard since a required raised median island on Foothill Boulevard will limit access to the site from such street to only right hand turn access. Moreover, with the inclusion of specific conditions to prohibit truck traffic and truck parking on Helms Avenue and Devon Street, adjacent to the subject site, the development of the subject site will alleviate an existing problem of true" utilizing the streets to avoid the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Consequently, with the development of this project, those existing impacts from heavy vehicle traffic for those residents adjacent to the subject site will be reduced; (iii) Any noise generated to adjacent residences as a result of the construction and operation of the project will be minimal with the specific '.ims limitations conditions imposed on the project for opaTttion, delivery and trash pickup. More specifically, with :;ia design of the project providing additional setbacks at the southerly boundary of the project and tho addition of a six foot sound attenuation block wall along the south property boundary line, noise from the proposed project to those residents to the south of the project site will be minimized. Further, noise impacts to those residents south of the subject site will be further reduced with the required inclusion of dense, sound attenuating, landscaping 7.5' Resolution ;;o. Page Pour all along the south property line of the project and the fact that such residences are substantially below the grade of the subject site. Finally, the noise of vahiclas along the southerly parking and access area of the site will be reduco9 due to the imposition of the specific condition that such access areas be provided ;pith wrought iron security fencing to be liked during the nighttime hours to restrict access to such areas; security 11 (iv) With the specific conditions limiting y g htin g posts to a maximum height of 13 feet, together with protective chieidiug on such light structures and reduced - glare hi5h pressure sodium lights, the spillover of light vnd glare into adjacent reuidential areas will be minimal; (v) With the inclusion of the specific condition to requtra security patrols during the nighttime„hzur&, the installation of the six foot blocit wall, dense landacapin-7 to discourage climbing such block wall, time limitations for sarvice delivery activity and the inclusion of security fencing to prohibit nighttime access, the southerly parking and access area will not become an area for loitering or provide an avenue of entrance for criminal activities to those residents to the south of the project site. 4. Based upon the substantial ovidenca presented to this Council during the above - referenced January 20, 71900 public hearing and upon the specific findings of fact set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows; a. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of thu Development Coda of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the purposes of the Foothill Specific Plan, Community Commercial District, in which the site is located; b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare and will not be materially injurious to the properties and improvements in the vicinity; and, c. Evidence presented to this Council has identified no substantial potential adverse effects of the design and development specified in the Application. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4, abava, this Council hereby approves the Application subject to ea,h and every of the following 011 Resolution Ho. Page Five conditional and in the Standards Conditions attached herato, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated heroin by this reference. P'ennino pjY11Jyj (1) The pedestrian connection between Shop 103" and Retail "C" and between Retail "A" and Shop 02" shall hove additional pedestrian amenities such as benches, free - standing potted plants and adequate lightiAg for safety purposes. The building elevations along those two pedestrian connections shall have recessed window areas rather than popped -out window arias. Detailed design shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (2) All pedestrian pathways and across circulation aisles shall be of textured treatment such a interlocking brick.. Pavers, exposed aggregate or a combination of both. Samples shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. (3) The existing ntextrad aOxwr.ate aa:ttured pavement in the existing driveway off Hal-- Avenut shall be replaced with textured material consistent wig'% the ahoppirq cantor. Pad "B ". (4) Pedestrian amenities oiiall be providad In front of (5) Random stacking of roof tale anall be provided. (a) A signifi:.antly greater amount of trees, as wall as increased number of box aired tract shall be planted along Foothill Boulevard. (7) The corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue and along Foothill Boulevard shall have special landscape treatment consistent with the suburban parkway design guidelines of tho Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The parxway characteristics shall include informal clustering of London Plane trees, california Sycamore and crape Myrtle, rolling turf berms, undulating sidewalks and hardscapa to compliment this informal landscape treatment. Detailed design shall be subject to city Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building Permits. (B) An increased number of trees and box sized trees shall be planted along Hallman Avenue to make up the landscaping along the public right -of -way consisting of a 12 foot wide %7 Resolution No. Page six sidewalk and a 3 foot high flat wall. A landscape mound should be provided up to the 3 foot high flood wall. (9) Within plaza areas, special landscape treatments such as accent trees, specimen size trees and increased nurber of trees shall be provided. entire south Dense landscaping shall be provided along the h property boundary in front of the six foot hign block wall with trees, shrubs and appropriate ground cover. It. addition, bougainvillea vines or another type of vine that will qrow along this entire stretch cf block wall uhall be planted to discourage graffiti and discourage people from climbing over. (11) All walls ouch as flood walls, retaining walls, screening walls shall be of decorative design consistent with -the. architectural style. (12) Dense landscaping should be provided within the 10 foot landscape area along the entire south property boundary with evergreen trees, shrubs and appropriate ground cover. (13) The block wall and landscaping along the south property boundary shall be designed to attenuate noise. An acoustical study shall be submitted to verily noise attenuation ror Planning Division review m15 approval prior to issuance of building permits. (14) Signs shall be conveniently posted along this rear service driveway and parking area for "no overnight parking", and "employee parking only." (15) All light pole fixtures shall not exceed the height of 15 feet measured from the finished grade. Wail mounted lighte for the rear elevation shall not exceed 15 feet measured from the finished grade of the parking lot. All lighting fixtures shall have shielding mechanisma to prevent light and glare into the southerly properties. (16) A uniform handscaps and street furniture treatment including trash receptacles, free - standing potted plants, bike racks, and light bollards, etc., shall be utilized for the shopping cantor and shall be designed to be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division revicv and approval prior to issuance of building permits. %8 Resolution No. Page Seven (17) The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved site plan which includes architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, , landscaping and grading on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein and Development code regulation, (18) Provision for security patrol of the shopping center at least three times per evening, seven days per week betwoen the hours of 10 :00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., by a licensed private patrol operator. (19) The block wall along the south property line and landscaping to the south of said wall shall be required to commence construction prior to forming foundations and ahall be completed as soon as physically possible and in no case lees than seven (7) days subsequent to the pouring of the first coacrata._. slab for the center. (20) Provisions for the following design foatureo in the trash enclosure to the satinfac'.ion of the city Planner: a. Architecturally integrated into the Casign of the shopping center. b. separate pedestrian accass that does not require opening the main doors t•i include salf- closing podestrirn doer. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll -up moors. e. Trash bins with counterweighted lids. trellis. !. Architecturally treated overhead shade g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. (21) Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. only. (22) Additional landscaping shall be provided along the back of the scutherly building adjacent thereto, in a five (5) foot to ten (10) foot deep planter, to include ground cover, OA 79 4 Resolution No. Page Eight 24 inch -bux size traeL cbrubs, and vines .e the satiefa f the City Planner. (23) Provision for 23 inch -box size evergreen trees along the South property boundary to create a dense buffer. (24) Graffiti shal) be removed within 72 hours. (25) The entire site shall be kept fray of trash anO debris at all times, and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than twenty -four (24) hours. (26) Wrought iron pedestrian gates shall be installed on the south ends of th1, breezeways in the southerly building and kept locked after business hours. (27) Provision for additional architectural treatment to the rear elevation of the southerly building to be approved by the Design Review Committee. (28) All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards, which shall be incorporated into the lease agreement of all tenants: a. Haise Levels. All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60dBA during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and 65dBA during the hours of 7100 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. b Loading and Unloading. No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxoa, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., unless otherwise specified heroin, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. (29) Hours of operation shall be restricts to 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. excluding Pads 'A' and IB•. (30) Posting signs prohibiting trucks from traveling on Helms, south of Hampshire and on Devon, betucen Archibald and Hellman to the satisfaction of the city Engineer and in accordance with an ordinance to be enacted by the City Council. (31) Posting signs prohibiting truck and truck trailer parking on Helms, south of Foothill to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. VA _., _ Rer lution No. Pagr Nine (32) Provision for wrought iron security fencing with gates locked at nighttime to restrict access to the southerly parking area to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Gates rust provide a Knox box access for fire and police /sheriff parapnnel. (33) All roofs shall be designed so that rain water is directed to outlet onto Hellman Avenue. Encinsering Div}sJ=g (1) Flood protection measures and necessary easements shall be provided as described in the preliminary flood report and as may be required by final flood report to include, but not limited to, a catch basin and atom drain system, flood walls and rolled driveways. (2) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) an the project side of Hellman Avenue shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage extending to the first pole south oS tho project (all poles along the project frontages shall bo removed) prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half of the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development and /or redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite side of the streat. (3) "No parking any time" zones shall ba provided along Poothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Enginear. 6. Irafs Council hereby provides notice to Mr. MICKEL F. ROY, Senior Vice - President, HG WEST COMMERCIAL OEVELOpHEHT CORPORATION, and any and all interested persons who gave testimony in opposition to the project at the public hearing of January 20, 1988, that the time within which judicial review of th. decision represented by thin Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1096.6. 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to those persons identified in paragraph S, above. $1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCADIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven All -, Jr. Ctvii Engineer SUBJECT: Award the Baseline Road Widening Improvement Project between Archibald Avenue and Halloran Avenue to J. E. G. Construction Company, Inc., for the .amount of $264,307.17, to be funded from the Systems Fund RECO00ME1DATIOM: a It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for Baseline Road Widening Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, J. E. G. Construction Company, Inc., for the amount of $264,307.15. Background /Analysis Per prvlous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on Jarv:.iry 22, 1988, for the subject project, which widens existing bottleneck to ultimate width. J. E. G. Construction Company. Inc., is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of $284.307.15 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $247.000.00. Staff h:s reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submitted, RHM:SA:sm Attachment cc: Purchasing r 0 A iR Vyx � K m� n N N C> K C � 7 J p S O A V O H I I yO, F E O • I-,. a -= � ` � � 7</ 2�`# ƒ �� . \ \ § 7 \ k � 2 a � . � > \7 A t n R, I C i• — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FRAY.: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvexnt Security and Real Property Izprovment Contract and Lein 4greement for CUP 86-02, located on the northwest corner of Beryl and 19th Streets, submitted by Comimmity Baptist Church L1 Aita Lola. PECOMIONTION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolJfion" accepting the subject agreements and security and authorizing the Mayor end the City Clerk to sign said agreements. ANALYSIS/BACKGROL910 CUP 86-02 located on the northwest corner of Beryl and 19th Streets, in the Medium Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Cmvaisslon on July 9, 1986. Ths Developer, Caaamnity Baptist Church of Alta Loma, is submitting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement to juarentee the future undergrounding of overhead utilities on Beryl and 19 Streets and is also submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the constructton of the off -site fmproveaents in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $13,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 6,500 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. a Respectfully submitted, Attachments 8.1 '�,i� .F`J;' }� "r.�A�'_ =�r ,.r_ gyp, � _ -7 +T� ''- _ ., ''ri:F:'•�.rt7F-'r.,,. « y 88-04 ; �+ RESOLUTION NO. fi SAVy; -S A '„atiialOU Or THE CITY'CCUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RAKHO CUC.WDKGA, &CUTIKU A REAL PROPERTY IWROYEKhT,CONTRACT 1-511 LIEN AGREEMENT FROM CO WNITY BAPTIST CHURCH AND ' AJTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho',Cucamonge%alpted Ordinance No. Se on rebruary 21, 1979, to establish-'requirements .for construction of public improvements in conjunction with building "-'perrdt issuance; and _ - _ n`• WHEREAS, undergrouhdng of existing overhad utilities establlshpd as prerequisite to issdanco` of building permit for CUP 66 -02 has been not by- _ entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreeli,cnt by Community Baptist Church. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City -of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said peal Pro arty Improvement -- -- Contract and Lien A99raement, authorizes tha Mayor and thelity Clerk to sign-,"' same, and directs as City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. - y RESOLUTION NO. 88 -6`15 .y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF= RANCHO CUC4WGA, CALIFORNIA, APPPOVING IMPRDVEMENT AGREEMENT iy AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 86 -02 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvemsant Agreement executed'-i December 8, 1987, by Community Baptist Church as developer, -for the Improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described VIErefn. and generally located on the northwest corner of Beryl and 19th Streets; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the texas thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to planning Comission, CUP 66 -02; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improiement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the saw are hereby approved and the Nayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on b0nli of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest th —aLo. a J s-7 Y� 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDMMWG DWOON 1 C✓\ 1TEK CUP 86-OZ. N Trrm- E7GaB1Z- Mt CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF' REPORT DATE: February 3, 7988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguirel City Enginetr BY: Unda•Beek. Engineering Technician S'J&IECi: Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from.fleal S. and Rebacca.A. Weeks, for a single family residence, locatef on the west side of Crooked)Creek Drive, south -of Hillside Road RECOMMENINTILN: It is reccmoended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien agreement and causing the -same to record. Background /Analysis The developers, Neal S. and Rebecca A. Weeks, of 5570 Crooked Creek Drive, south of Hillside Road, requested a building, permit for a single family residence. Stteet improvements are a. conditita of icsuing the building permit. The City does not require said improvements to be Lilt at this time. Therefore, the developers ha submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the construction of the Improvements on Crooked Creek Drive. A copy of the Agreement is available to the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitte , RHM:LB:sd Attachment 79 i r<, 1 ■ MEN 4 1 r, RESOLUTION Nd. 1J 1r— 04(a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHG - CUCAMONGA. ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT g CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM MEAL S. AND REBECCA A. WEEKS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN C THE SAME ., WHEREAS, the City Council of tha Ci.y of Rancho Cucamonga' t adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements 'a for construction of public improvements in conjunction with building -+ permit issuance; and WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement J established as prerequisite to issuance of buII ng permit for "57) Crooked Creek Drive has been met by entry into a Real Property , Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Neal S. and Rebecca A. Weeks. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes tare Mayor and the City Clerk to sign sane, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the 3ffice of the :aunty Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. r .a ,N V 7 > r= � 79 - rrlusmr Y• �- l 1a f IY . � Ill I Iu I I I V IIV 1 6-570 / 1 r• a. •r n u 0 r CITY OF ME N RANCHO CUCAMONGA nnm- Cr. �� d ENGMEMMG DRIMON C r-eek Drive �7C�; 71 's RECMMDRTION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached " ' - resolution approving the vacation of certain landscape and drainage easements located north of Highland Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to record same. Background As a requirement of its development, the Caryn Planned Commwnity (both Phases I and II) was conditioned to install certain flood mitigation measures for the protection of its site and properties to the south. Initially, those measures within the proposed Foothill Freeway right -of -way consisted of a channel which emptied into a detention basin. Drainage easements were obtained by the City for these facilities. After modif' •ion by Calrrans of the future freeway grades, the State -atecvined that only an underground drainage system located sout .. the initial alignment would be acceptable. The storm drain was installed at this revised aligrment and was directly connected to the existing Bay Basin thereby eliminating the need for a detention basin at this site. This work, within the future freeway right -of -way, was performed under a CalTrans permit. Analysis With the revision to the storm drain alignment, it has became necessary to vacate those drainage easements which encompassed the initial alignment and detention basin. Those necessary drainage casements which reflect the final alignment have been obtained by the City. In addition, a landscape easement located adjacent to the Rochester Avenue right -of -way has been obtained by the City. 9A — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 i TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to summarily vacate certain unneeded drainage easements within the future freeway corridor north of Highland Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue RECMMDRTION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached " ' - resolution approving the vacation of certain landscape and drainage easements located north of Highland Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to record same. Background As a requirement of its development, the Caryn Planned Commwnity (both Phases I and II) was conditioned to install certain flood mitigation measures for the protection of its site and properties to the south. Initially, those measures within the proposed Foothill Freeway right -of -way consisted of a channel which emptied into a detention basin. Drainage easements were obtained by the City for these facilities. After modif' •ion by Calrrans of the future freeway grades, the State -atecvined that only an underground drainage system located sout .. the initial alignment would be acceptable. The storm drain was installed at this revised aligrment and was directly connected to the existing Bay Basin thereby eliminating the need for a detention basin at this site. This work, within the future freeway right -of -way, was performed under a CalTrans permit. Analysis With the revision to the storm drain alignment, it has became necessary to vacate those drainage easements which encompassed the initial alignment and detention basin. Those necessary drainage casements which reflect the final alignment have been obtained by the City. In addition, a landscape easement located adjacent to the Rochester Avenue right -of -way has been obtained by the City. 9A CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT-' FEBRUARY S, 1988 " PAGE 2 This easement, which contains a clause relinquishing the easement by the City once the freeway has been constructed, replaces a similar landscape easenent'not containing this clause. This first easemorc should also,be vacated. Those easements required for vacation were obtained over numerous separate parcels. - Since, that time those parcels have been combined into a single parcel. Tha easements in-question would-be vacated to the owner of•that single parcel. •• Respectfully su fitted, �P -��-- DVI-77 G'fy e. f h RMM:US:sd Alt chment sy •t r 93 %i RESOLUTION NO. %,g-0q7 A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMOLRILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF CERTAIN UNNEEDED DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FOR LANDSpiPE OR DRAINAGE PURPOSES NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND REST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate certain easements for landscape or drainage purposes herein more particularly described; and WHEREAS, replacement easements, where necessary, have been obtained - by the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council found from all the evidence submitted that certain landscape and drainage easements are unneeded for present or: prospective landscape or drainage purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby s ma k if order vacating those certain easemnts as sham on Map V -079 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which have been further described in legal descriptions which are attached hereto, marked ,aahlj�sl+-appugh- .1X•ya#vaf, and by reference made a part thereof, �LWI�f SECTION 'L: That from and after the date the resolution is recm•ded, said easements TF landscape or drainage purposes no longer constitute public easements. SECTION 3 chat the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to 7F recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. • 9Y STREET VACATION CASE NO. 079 Parcel I Being a Portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 6 Nest, San Bernardino Base, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 30, said corner also being the intersection of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue (Orange Street); thence North 00002002" East. 250.26 feet along the Centerline of said Rochester Avenue; thence North 890571580 Nest, 40.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 890361094 Nest, 40.00 feet; thence North 000021024 East, 50.00 feet; thence South 890361090 East, 40.00 feet; thence South 000021020 Nest, 50.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 2,070 square feet more or less. Parcel II The East 601 24 feet cf the South 424.00 feet of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the :southeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 6 Hest, San Bernardino leridian, as per Government survey. Excepting therefroc the East 20.00 feet. 1. Also excepting therefrom the South 33.00 feet. Parcel Ili The North 80.00 feet of the South 245.00 feet of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 6 Nest, San Bernardino Meridian, according to Government survey. Excepting therefrom the East 601.24 feet thereof. `arcel IV lie North 80.00 feet of the South 245.00 feet of the East 1/2 of the Southwest /4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 1 North, range 6 Nest, San Bernardino Meridian, according to Government survey. :.ircel V 14e North 80.00 feet of the South 300.00 feet of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 214 of the Southwest 1/4 of 0e Southeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 6 Mist, San Bernardino Meridian, according to Government survey. d' STREET VACATION CASE No. 079 ' PAGE 2 i Parcel VI The North 80.00 feet of the South 245.00 feet of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the'Southeast 114 of Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 6 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to Government survey. ' _ Parcel VII - _ - • 1 The North 80.00 feet of the South 300.00 feet of the West 1/2 of'Oe Southwest - 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 oil the Southeast 114 of Section 30, Township 1 North, ; Range 6 West, San Bernardino Neridian, according to Government survey._. Parcel VIII - The North 80.00 feet of the South 245.00 feet of the Last 1/2 of the Southeast �. 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwas* 1/4 of Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 6 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to Government survey:''-"_;" - Parcel IX J ' An 85.00 foot wide strip of land in, on, over and across that certain portion ' of the Southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 6 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to goverment survey shown as the southerly remainder parcel on Parcel Nap No. 8617 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, per map recorded in Book 96 of Parcel Naps, Pages 82 through BE, inclusive, words of said county, the northerly line of said strip of land being described as follows: Beginning at the most southerly Southeast corner of Parcel 4 of said map, thence North 890490250 West 631.63 feet along the southerly line of said parcel; thence continuing along said southerly line North 860071190 West -- 300.00 feet. - --ez Q m W W_ O C 0 W S J IC.. Z W u N y Y W N O 6 C y W W N N W O O U 6 6 6 d W N N N N Q O N S O C L 6 Vr Z C 6 CZ d 2 K CC Q W d 6 Z W W ZW W 14� Z 4' p Q p T6. QZ ti q pZp Q J Q J J Z Q Q a Z Q Q J p C N N N N O O J d' W 2 n u m m m m m m m m m N M T T T T T M T O T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m m m m O m m m m u W az 2 W ' fA Q Z O h IQ V Q f. W W Q V1 �_ II G¢ 4 a I = pC 4 K is jR W z LL � W 1F --ez Q m W W_ O C 0 W S J IC.. Z W u N y Y W N O 6 C y W W N N W O O U 6 6 6 d W N N N N Q O N S O C L 6 Vr Z C 6 CZ d 2 K CC Q W d 6 Z W W ZW W 14� Z 4' p Q p T6. QZ ti q pZp Q J Q J J Z Q Q a Z Q Q J p C N N N N O O J d' W 2 n u m m m m m m m m m N M T T T T T M T O T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m m m m O m m m m u W az 2 W ' fA Q Z O h IQ V Q f. W W Q V1 r A, cI STAFF RE9©RTca February ], 19gB µansger DATE: and City C1ty Council GitY Engineer T0: of {wssell N• re, Ieclnicinn 19 for Lot 8 Linda Beek, Engineering S bo dlna8e6tionOrche,a Street, subeltud by SUBJECT: 4Prev7176 t aced A• Taylor. Tract L. and Roland 3` i. adopt t'a athehMaynre °nd.titY.... PECOl ATI�i• the Ci yement it Authorizing o0ended that of and ? It is ret id Subordination Agre aDD roving s19n saab• Clerk 7 19B1 for the n' Background /Analysis City Council on Nad Kent as pProved by City d Street' wires that a lk at roject, the lender rem 1erder. A lien a9re a sl financing their P favor °.f Subordination construction of ura financln4 for to liens in at�chea In order sr�entvb A STbYlor ^ha a subaltted the the Lien end Carolyn approval. Rolan. A9re�nt for City ,ctfullY su/dY ResP- Linda Beet icfan En9ineerin9 7echn W..LB: sa .i; u, PESOLUIION 140. $g- OyS D7t0 CITY I�o 1M4710K GP R►Z�F�TM �YOIt A PESOL lox YA A, 7A7L00. AND AOf WLMD1TM CyEDPK .1O SIG$,., _ Lien 9 for ARD nt gOrchard ,,,t Contract an Street was apprcved by 9s Council a Peal Prope° lapchar the installation sidewalk ale "San Bernardino County, on 12. on May 25' L�1C1 an -104 2 1 °d in financing the lien in_ for t10 project, the ,,,gent ko. secure for the developer, ad lien be subordli» W1�that the above -w A �.ctsent to lender, reQu lender- and fitted &.Subordination 9 S- favor of the has sub°e %ecution. City Of WERW- City s approval and City Counreemnttb n sa1d that effect o� the 0, BE I7 pESOLYlD by Rhe author zed to Band the n a, California• thatt s isCltr byatioM�Cucoon9a. ubor sae ce at b U. app anbe f of of Pa subordination A9reae° °eto City Clerk attest that �t 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � � ��• p e r it r /00 ]Ira ; 8406 ORCMRD STREET 4rML. eY 0 (hI 0• 0. 0. 0• 0. 0• 0• 9. 0. 4 0. C'. ON 01I ®11 oX ®Y OY 0. OY 11 .y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � � ��• p e r it r /00 ]Ira ; 8406 ORCMRD STREET 4rML. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAn STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 i i• TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve N. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion I z REC011EI1W1TION: The required street improvements for Tract 13203 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Giurantee Bond in the amount�gf— „ SS,800, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and h authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $58,000. ' Background /Analysis t Tract 13203 - located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Center Avenue. DEVELOPER: Robertso.N Homes 1003 Cooley Drive, Suite 102 t Colton, CA 92324 r' Accept: Maintenarce Guarantee Bond (Street) $5,609 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $58,000 r Rgspectfully su15itted, RHM:SMG:dIw i k �� ) a y:_ RESOLUTION NO. 'b8- 0 4 9 A RESOLUTION OF. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, CALIFORNIA„ ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPMENENTS FOR TRACT 13203 AMO•AUTHORIMG THE FILINO.OF A WTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WM ., WHEREAS, the cnnstructior. of public Improvements for-Tract 13203 have , bean completed to the r,dtisfaction of the City Engineer; and ` AREAS, a :otice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW. THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 4 r 1O 0 CaY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT BATE- February 3, 1988 TO: City Council end City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY. Linda Beek, Engincering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Revocation, Release, Satisfaction and Cancellation of Agreement for Postponement of CUR'S for Tracts 13057 and 13058 RECOMMENDATION: It is recomaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution_ . approving the Revocation, Release, Satisfaction and Cancellation of Agreement for Tracts 13057 and 13058 and authorizing the Mgor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record. Background /Analysis On July 22, 1987, the City .:Duncil entered into an agreement for the postponement of CCSR's for Tracts 13057 and 13058, sail agreement was recorded on August 13, 987, document No. 87.230697, Official Records of San Bernardino County California. CC&R's have been approvad by the City Attorney for Tracts 13057 and 13058 and recorded as follow; TRACT GATE DOCUMENT N0. 13057 October 28, 1987 87- 384776 13058 Decezber 28, 1987 87- 450015 The recording of the CC&R's meets all conditions of the agreement recorded on August 13, 1987. �Respectful) y sub9 it e� P.M :LB:sd Attachment 103 C• RESOLUTION N0. W-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO J POSTPONEMENTAOrFAPPROVALEOFACC &R'SNFOR TRACTS 13057 AND 13058 WHEREAS, to meet the requirements, as a prerequisite to approval of building permits for Tracts 13057 and 13058, the subdivider of said tracts, lho William Lyon Company, entered into an Agreement for Postponement of Cl'SR s; and WHEREAS, said requirements have been met by the recc-dation af- CC&R s by The Fieldstone Company for Tract 13057, recorded as document No. 87- 384?76, and by Pulte Hanes Ccrporatlon for Tract 130S8, recr.ded as document No. 87- 450015, records of San Bernardino County, Californt;, and said deveiopars have each submitted a Revocation. Release,' Satisfaction and Cancollation of Agreement for approval ano execution by said City. (low, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City. of Ranch-) Cucamonga, California as follows: 1. That said agreements be and the same are approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto and cause same to be recorded upon said execution. r ' .._ /0y , 0 --- CITY OF RANC10 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Febuary 3, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager F,;W: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works SUDJECT: Ap roval of Improvement Agreement Extension for, Percel Map 8617, locate6 on toe east lido of Milliken Avenue, north of Highland Avenue, submitted by Marlborough Development. NEC01NE"TIDIi It is recommended that the City Council adoot the attached resolution, acre Dting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing — the Mayor and City Clerk Eo sign snid agreement. AMALYSIS/BACKGRDUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to gusrantee the constriction of the public iaprovemnnts for Pa.,cel Msp 8617 were approved by the City Council on October 10, 1.984, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $288,000 Labor and Material Bond: 2144,000 The developer, Marlborough Development, is requesting aporoval of a 12•• month extension on said improvement agreecent, Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully subs tad RHM. SG:,jh /06 N h i t:,rvr� 'y'; Ada tl -�• �{ ` � - ` -+a ', ~� .i �Nml.� RESOLUTION N0. SS- O.SI +; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CUUWCIL OF THE CITY OF RWHO CUCAMOW. CALIFORHIA,.APPROVINO 1MPROVEIENT AOREEIEHr EXTENSION AND,IMPROYEKMT CECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP4617 California. has forhitsironsideratlon aneImprroov"ent RgrcesentEzatenslon 4 - executed on February 3 1988, by Marlborough Development as: developer, for the fmproverent of public right -way adjacenYto'the -of rcal�property`sppect`ically described therein, and generally located an 'tha east aide of Milliken /.venue k north of Highland Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Conjunction Agreement and and the termss =thereof, is to be done in development of said Parcel.ilap 8617; and - WHEREAS, said Imp ovement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufffefent Improvement Securfty, which,is idefitifflid- - in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the'same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby outhortzed to sign said Imprommeet Agreerlant Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. /07 — CITY OF RANCII0 CUCAAIONCA STAFF REPORT' DATE: February 3, 19SR TO: City Council and City Naneger i.' FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda B-ek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Iagrovyent Agreement dnd Iaryroveeent Security for Tract 13275, locatod between Leann and Highland Avenues, east of Haven Avenue, submitted by Olcford Development Corporation waviamnow It is recommended that the City Council adopt the atteched resolution — auLving the Tract 13275, accepting the subject agreement and security and ho 9 Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. AIIALYSIS /BACKGROUND Tract 13275, located between Lemon and Highland Avenues, east of Haven Avenue, in the Medium High Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on June 25th, I9a6, for the division of 19.2 acres into 3 lots. The Develop!r, Oxford DoveiOP"ent Corporation, is submltVng an agreemeit and security to guarantee the construction of the cff -site improvements In the following am�urtts: Time Certificate of Deposit Faithful Performance 9ond: $52,000 Labor dnd Material Bond: $26,0011 Copies of Ake agreement and security are available In the City Clerk's Office. Lptt =rs of approval have been received frpm U a h elementary school districts and Cucamonga school and County igh fuh District. C.C.AR.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. Respe_tfuiiy su* tted, Dr�-••n Win. E,y -, RH.ri: LB: jh Attachments /09 I'r mr XSOLUTION No. A S- O S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RiMCHO 3R�.�P Y p4TjENN5IlPRDVElENT EGUITYAND FINk M4OF CT I • submittedbE�' the Tehtative_itap of Tract No °13275, consisting of 3 lots, and Highland Avenues. east o7'Havennhasibeen submitted,toothe city of. Ranchos Cucamonga by said Subdivider. and'approved by said City as provided in the Subdivlsion Map Act of the State of C&Hforn:i,•_and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance Mo. 'B'of said City; ono YNEREAS, to meet the requirements establishtd as prerequisite to Iapproval of the Final ma of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the mprovement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said approvagsaidrFinal Map 3ufficient Tor public useathesstt et ar —I dellineated thereon. to dow, THER''FORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the CitV Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: I. rhat said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to ex-cute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto, and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. Tnat the offers for dedication and the Final Map delinoatfng save be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certiffcate thereon on behalf of said City. • / Jac _� I09 u: +m W w i C t s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E'NGDMMMG DYYMON s .pr. R i t r� t° ' ei 24 ...m .•�h�r7u. I r T1TM. �l r' T; r CITY OF RANCHO CUC_41CONGA STAFF REPORT • i DATE: February 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Hanager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 10972, located between Highland Avenue and Banyan Street and between Milliken Avenue and the Deer Creek Channel, submitted by Alveanson Developments, Incorporated RECOIftliOATIOM: It is Mcormended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 10972 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Background /Analysis Tentative Parcel Map 10972 was approved by Planning Commission on December 9, 1987, for the division of 73.6 acres of land into 3 parcels in the K!dtum Low Residential Development District, located between Highland #,venue and Banyan Street and between Mil',lken Avenue and the Deer Creek Channel. Improvements are to be constrw:ted at the time of building pimit issuance. Respectfully subm tte��f, RHH :LB:sd Attachment r 3 IS . ^7 sl All RESOLUTION NO. S3-0S$ j A RESOLUrON OF THE CITY COL14CIL OF 7r ilr CUCAMCNGAI CALIrowk APPROVING PAR EiL MA NUMBER 0972 f . (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10972) 0 Oevelo WHERE' Tentative Parcel Map Number 10972, submitted by Ahmanson Developments, Incorporated and consisting of 3 parcels, located between Highland Avenue and Banyan Street and between Milliken Avenue and peer Creek Channel, was approved by the Planning Commission of the city of P.ancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 10976 is the final map of thn division of e- land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirmente established as prerequisite to _ approval of the final map by the City Council of said'City have now beer att_ y NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 10972 he and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. .q 1� 1 •a :L •'e{{ W A A A tv d x I� I i V- a.I, i It — C1TY OF RANCHO CUf AMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Febrn:ary 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, MY Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engfnearing Technician SUBJECT: ArPmval of Parcel Map 11230, ,ccated on the north side of I Red Oak Sto eat, between Laurel Street end Spruce Avenue, submitted by Barton Development et is recommended that City Council edopt the attcched resolution to record. pproving Parcel Map 11236 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same Analysis/Background Tentative Parcel Map 11236 was approved by the Planning Coemiission on sidJanuary 13, 1988, for the division of 3 acres of land into 2 parcels in elofsRedl ak StreetlabetweenopLaureli5trcet and SprucethAvenueh issuancea=nts are to be constructed at the time of building permit issuance. Respectfully submmiiitted, RIOI:LB:jh ✓ ✓� /•Yr�Y•0y Attachments � / /'/ M RESOLUTION N0. S8 -osq A RESOLUTION OF TY.E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NAP NUMBER 11236 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 11236) Oevelo Dnentand consistingeofa2cparcela ,+ilocated2on. the northdside of Red Oak .• a' Street, between Laurel Street and Spruce Avenue, was approved by the Planning CO=Isslon cP the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and la WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 11236 is the final map of the division of laid approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and T WHEREAS, ail of the requireawnts established as Prerequisite to approval of the final Abp by the City Council of said City have now been net. �I Rancho Cucamongga ,,RCalifornia,Tthhaattsaid Parcel Nap NCumberr 11236 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present saw to I the County Recorder to be filed for record. a T E 4 M� O C �! zql CL �gliAq � b �q 1w a •. t �z 4 zI �awMy �o F�eygN �� 1 ilk't t- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 ` f:r TO: City Council and City Manager �—'^^�� FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Setting public hearing for March 2, 1988 - Approval for Amending, Map Tract No. 13058, located south of Highland Avenue, between Fairmont Way and the Deer Crack Channel, submitted by ,Ulte Home Corporation; a Michigan Corporation RECGMMENDRTION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the date for public hearing for approval of Amending Map - -Trutt' 13058 for March 2, 1988. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND The developer, Pulte Homes, Corporation; A Michigan Corporation, filed an application for Design Review for Tract 13058. On October 28, 1987, the Planning Commission approved said Design Review with a condition for an amended map for adjusting lot lines. The attached resolution sets the date for a public hearing to approvd Amending Map, Tract No. 13058, for March 2, 1988. Respectfully submi/tj{e�d, RHM:LB :dlw Attachment • 117 RESOLUTION N0. '6 - OSS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO APPROVE AMENDING HAP, TRACT 13058 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING 08JECTiONS THERETO WHEREAS, the Amending Map of Tract No. 13058, consisting of 200 lots, submitted by Pulte Hone, Corporation; a Michigan Corporation, Subdivider, located south of Highland Avenue between Fairmont Way and the Deer Creek Channel has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that notice is hereby given that on Mara: 2, 1988, at the hour of 7:30 P.N. in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line Road, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga any'and all persons having objections to the Amending Map of Tract 13058 may appear and show cease why said map shblll'd — - not record. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to Identify the same, and must be delievered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. i i� I yy.( /vr�,/ AVGnua CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGMEEmG BrMON Arxe,ae- .1 Af ✓\ mm. Trar-f 130 S£3 Trn a: a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhtONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1908 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: 4, roval to Annex Tract no. 13275, located 1,200 feet east of Haven Avenue, north side of Highland Avenue, to Landscape Maintenanco District No. 1 as Annexation `o. 42 and sotting the date of public hearing fot• March -2, 1988 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 42 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tract to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Analysts /Backarnund Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract No. 13275, located 1,2CO feet east of Ha'en Avo•ee north side of Highland Avenue. to Landscape Nainterance District No. for Annexation No. 42 and setting the public hearing date for 4arch 2, 1995. Also attached for Council consideration is a r so,c +:c diving preliminary approval if :he EnginePr's kepm r for the subject annexation. Letters from the deve,opers rt46.,stina the subject annexation are on fiie in the Engineering Division. Raspectfully suApi ted, RHM:JAA:sd d Attachments 1�0 a: a 3i , i RESOLUTION NO. SS-OSio A RESOLUTION'OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO a CUCAMONaA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY r ENCINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 42 TO LANDSCAPE - " MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, on February 3, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho ". Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of A said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report " has been presented to this Council for consideration; and J� r WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each ,, and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should= be— - - modified in any respect. ^' NOW. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: i SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o-7 sai3 work and of the incidental expenses to connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and dds—cr-MeTTn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the nroposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said s�sment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the Incidental expenses therecf, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION%A: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report fob purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. e At w. � x +_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District he. 1 Annexation No. 42 for Tract No. 13275 SECTION 1. Authority for Report mis report is in compliance with the reauirement:i of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Cod Statu of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 13275 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the rncorded Map as roa`dwayr - " right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or dovelopment plan and the assessment iiagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent ai if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred fcr parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purpose: will equal thirty (S.30) cents per squire foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 42 is as follows: Existing Annex New District No. 42 Total Landscape Area 920,152 0 920,152 No. of D. U 9,403 145 9,548 i IM a Per Lot Annual Assessment �). 920,9548 $28.91 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the ? attached assessment diagram, Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for incl usion, to the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. �, SECTION S. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and e labeled "Exhibit A•, by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated - ,v within the text of this report. a SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unttf t Where there 1s more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing to June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the CI.y during the previous fiscal year which are to be r.covered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting t.ct of :972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and Bets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year In May, the City Engineer files a report with t''v City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. a e f � �j Properties and iaprovements to be included within Annexation No. 1 to landscape Maintenance District No. 42: �y MAINTAINED AREA TRACT ASSESS _ UNIT (2W 0 .5) 145 ... is C� t Y, n 41• I ,15 d t is ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 42 c%u_ ``+n CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAi�fONCA L I ENGINEERING DIVISION t V �"' VICINITY MAP 1 NT IN EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. S9-0S7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGYGA, CALIFORNIA.DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER TAE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 42 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANOSC.4PING AND LIGHTING A9T OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and I.ighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Oeseription of Work: That the public interest and convenience repo re an s e n en ton of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance• and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereur dedicated for coamon greenbelt purposes by deed or recordsd subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described to Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located JEW odwayir gy -oi' -way nand landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled •Annexation No.42 to Landscape Maintenance District No. I. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemDla' ei�worTc� in the optic sa y council, is et more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, wnlch said district is assessed to pay the costs any expenses thereof, and which district 1s described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 42 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. /a4 RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 4. Reoort of En roger: The City Council of said City by Res aIution o. as approve a repor of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled 'Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 42, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for tie amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTIG.: 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collectedla e same me an rt e same manner as County taxes are collected The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in ,luny, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be dotermined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin : Notice is hereby given thdt on March 'T; %T, at :a hour o pa in the City Council ChImbers a* 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all parsons haven, any objections to th, work or extent of the assessment district, auay aprear. -,agd_ show c,.ase why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution, of Intention. Protests must be to writing and must contain a daeeription of the Property in which each signer thereof is interested, suffic4ent to Identify the same, and must be delivcred to the City Clerk of said city orio- to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or Objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown ,ipon tha last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the pproperty described in the protests, then such protest must rontain or 6e accmpinied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. herein Proposed siialll addanaiar �ymiehttnrongii fi pursuancelofhanwact of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Pubiiration of Resolution of Intention; Published notice shalt be m' ace pursuan o ec on v o e Go IN ode. the Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hear*, at least once in T',:e Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the,. City of Ontario, CaTffornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 0 3 CITY OF fUtNCHO CUCAMONGA `• ` c STAFF REPORT MATE: February 3, 1988 WN TO: City Cwncil and City Manager FROh. R',ssell H. Maguire, City Enginaer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Enyine :Tiro Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Parcel Itap 11236, located betxe2n Laurel Street and Spruce Avenue, north of Red Oak Street, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation Mo. 14 and setting the date of public hearing for March 2, 1988 - RECOPMORTIOti It is recomornnded that City Council adopt the attached resolutions — approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 14 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described parcel map to Landscape Maintenance District No, 36 Analysis /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Parcel Map 11236, located bet-teen Laurel Street and Spruce Avenue, north of Red Oak Strut, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Annexation No. 14 and setting the public hearing date for March 2, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval etters frrm h the Endev lopersRerequest requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. Respectfully sub3jtt , RNM:JAA:sd Attachments EAT c RESOLUTION NO. 97-pry A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL F THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMIPARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 14 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 WHEREAS, on February 3, 1488, the City Council of th^ City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report to writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1072; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk -of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or shofild'tiu modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Cmmcil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: that the tngineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expanses o sa work and of the incidental expenses In connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr e n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That tare proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in SUE[ ssessment District In proportion to the estimates benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, frog said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained In said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for —ETie purposes of all subsequent ,roceedings, and pursuant to the Froposed district. / J- laq CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 14 For Parcel Map 11236 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with with the requirents.of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Lode, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Descrlotlon This Maintenance tDistrictlNo. 3. ThedCity Councillhaswdetermineedd into to be maintained will have do effect upon all the developments as mentioned above- ° All landscaped areas to be maintained to the annexed dovelopments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in !le conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Eng!neering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development 1s hereby wade a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs Yo costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or/by the City. Based on historical dats, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (S.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,G57 square feet. The district was formed in October S. 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the Project boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. ,c Zone 2 is comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or wilt be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands en Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and some parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 14 is as follows. Zone 1 Existing Total estimated District maintenance cost $2,070 Assessment units 8 Total cost - assessment unit for year and month $270 • 5258.75 /year or $21.56 /mo. /lot Zone 2 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION S. Assessment Dlamram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A•, by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment lwi s for the lots within the District and tthat assessment tshall obeg equal lfor neach pa -cel for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for each tot or parcel in Zone 2. Existing Annexation New Total estimated annual District No. 14 Total maintenance area - Sq. Ft. 0 8 0 Assessment units, acre^ 380,573 3.02 380,576 Total cost • assessment unit for year and month --M0 xxS.30_ • $ 0 /year 0 /mo. /acre Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION S. Assessment Dlamram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A•, by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment lwi s for the lots within the District and tthat assessment tshall obeg equal lfor neach pa -cel for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for each tot or parcel in Zone 2. r: The City Council will hold „a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the ' Drevious fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. t” SECTION 1. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval 3f City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year to June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. Ai 9 Properties and improvements to tie Included (Zone 2) to 'strict within Annexation No. 14 Landscape Maintenar No. 3: PROPERTIES S PROJECT ACREAGE Parcel Map 11236 ' Pcl 1 1.20 +- Pcl 2 1.82 Total 3.02 x IMPROVEMFNT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IM ANNEXATION NO. 1 i• ? Area Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th St ^eet 0 0 I: �1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION NO. 14 ltder, cfs pPf- E 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONGA A s c COUNTY OF SAN BMARDINO / \ e; 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA � T No ERIHIBIT 'A': RESOLUTION NO. ? Y- 05 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 14 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descrl tion of Mark: That the public interest and convenience require an s e n en ion of this City Council to form -& maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance' arid — operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to Li located w n roadway r gg -o -way and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled •Annexation No. 14 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 °. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplatedwworcf in the opinion o said nc City ou is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain 'Rap of Annexation No. 14 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 30 heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. 13.15' RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * as approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled •EngineerGs Report, Annexation No. 14, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" is on file ire the office of the City Clerk of sail City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for tha amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected a t sane Lio andT{ sett son manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduit a Inaring upon said report at their first regular meeting In June, at rhich time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is Pereby given that on March re wur or pm in the city Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear ' artr — show cause why Laid work should not be done cr carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property to which each signer thereof Is interested, sufficient to identify the setae, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest Is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County :s the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein proposes s"Tia11 be done and carried roug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the S•reets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: P.,blished notice shall be muan o ec on 61961 o t e vernment Code. Tho Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the sane, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearfhg, at least once in The Dail Report. n newspaper of general circulation published In the city of Ona ornta, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 134 —.CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 W5 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract No. 13275 and Parcel Map No. 11236 (various locations throughout the City) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No.- 37 and setting the date of public hearing for March 2, 1988 RECD ODATIO1 it is recommended tnat City Council adopt the attached resoTuL•`fons _:�'. approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 37 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described developments to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. Analysis /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's Intent to annex Tract No. 13275 and Parcel Map No. 11236 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation 37 and setting the public hearing date for March 2, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. R pectfully sub fitted. Ora�fy� y 6xfµ RHM:JAA:sd attachments rM RESOLUTION 40. '3g -()60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAHOMGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 37 TO STREET LIGHTING MAIHTEHANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 WHEREAS, on March 2, 1988, the City Council of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report to writing as required by the Land' e C tyClerk Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk uP said City a report in writing as railed for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Count for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report_is-.... sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modif,ed in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses 0?-37T-work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and eacl; of thn are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram sP,owing the Assessment District referred to and desc-FFFT7n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions or land within said Assessment District are Ivereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in saTJ —Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work aid of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. Report fo�the SECTION rposes That ofrsall subsequent shall Proceedings ,Nandipursuant to the proposed district. I.- c t ;1. r :i z.. Q CITY OF RANCHO COCAWNGA Engineer's Report for St,eet Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 37 for Tract No. 13275 and Parcel Map No. 11236 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Cali•ornia (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have mi effect_ upon all lots within said developments as well as on tha lots directly '"""' abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary aad usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development a ' as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby mare to the subject tract rap or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact locatirn of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. ,t a: s SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that mainten&mce costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. Thess costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual :ost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is cctprised of street tight improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single f+wily, multi - family, condomin ums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zonz will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, co mrerciat and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas do;•tves the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Street Lighting Maintenance District No 1 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost, *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Letup Size Lamps Rate Ho's Maint. Cost 5800L 444 X 3 11.93 X 12 f 47,579.04 9500L 485 X $11.16 X 12 59,131.20 16,000L 16 X $12.08 X 12 2,319.36 22.OuOL 4 X $13.84 X 12 664.32 27,500 6 X $15.31 X 12 2.939.5Z Total Anjival Maint. Cost $112,633.44 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 15,870 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 151 Total Assessment Units 16,021 No, of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No 37 Total 5800L 444 0 444 9500L 485 0 485 16,000L 16 0 16 22,000L 4 0 4 27.50OL 6 0 6 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Letup Size Lamps Rate Ho's Maint. Cost 5800L 444 X 3 11.93 X 12 f 47,579.04 9500L 485 X $11.16 X 12 59,131.20 16,000L 16 X $12.08 X 12 2,319.36 22.OuOL 4 X $13.84 X 12 664.32 27,500 6 X $15.31 X 12 2.939.5Z Total Anjival Maint. Cost $112,633.44 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 15,870 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 151 Total Assessment Units 16,021 tl,C °• �• 3. Cast per Assessment unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost S112 633.44 • 17.03 /year /unit' No. o Units n r c — I s t"02i— .��. Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. `t SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram y: Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No, 10, Annexation No. 37. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the Y, text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Imrovements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per.. {r net acre. -z I SECTION 7. Order of Events e W. 1. City Council aaopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of Cit; Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the Individual assessments. r - ---- -77-77-7- 'x••a�.iVl�:l{'•i F, EXHIBIT 'A• F Properties and4mprovements to be includad within Annexation No. c< 37 to Street Lighting,Maintenance District 1: '" 4% Assess. No, of 'La s to be Annexed Project Acreage Zone 1 7 TR13275 (290 Q .5; 145 --- --- --- -- a. k` c Zone 2 [ PH 11236 pc) 1 1,20 2.4 _ -_ ___ - -_ PC'. 2 1_82 3_6 3.02 6.0 --- --- -- Total 151 _ _ _ - — ♦4 ° lw_ si.in ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 3 7 f,L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cow .1-f OF SAN BRIWARDWO r i — STAYS OF CALIFORNIA -- � T ti a 0 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET UGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.! ANI* XATION NO. 3 7 1 2A pP� E CITY OF RANCHO CUCALSONGA I � I COUNTY OF a" BSBNARDINO ATE OF CALUORNIA Q RESOLUTION NO. $$-0G A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTIOr. TO ORDER THE ANNEXArim TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 37 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARINII OBJECTIONS THERETO NOM, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tion of Mork: That the public interest and convenience F-e- re an s e1on of this city Council to fofta a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and- - operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described In Section 2 hereof. Said xaintenance and operation includes the cost and sup"rvision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said dircrict. SECTION 2. Lo•.tion of Work: The foregoing described work is to be Located w t n roadway r g t -o -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file In the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 37 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 10. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the ccnttmpla ewor:; in -TR opinion or said y Council- Is , of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexati0,,It0. 37 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * as 'approved-the report of the engineer if work which report Indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. /ys ' RESOLUTION fat PAGE 2 �Yr SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected�a the same '77 me an n e sa¢e manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of maid City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Pearin : Notice is hereby given "that on March 7290 ,—bt our o : Pm n e City Council C -x Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done a¢ or carried out or why said district should not be formed to accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writingg and most contain a description of the Property in which each signer thereof is interested, _ t sufficient to identify the sane, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the herein g; and no other protests or obJectlons will be considered. If the signer of any protest 1s rot shown upon the last equal d z assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property — described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evldmce that such signer is the owner of the property so described. - SECTION 7. Landsca —ightlna Ac of 1972: All the work herein propose s all 7e ono an carr a r ug n ' pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of Calitornia designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. of Resootutioe ooverrwentanode ubThehMgyo tics shall he a pursuanPutoicectoan shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cease the Same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The DailY Report. a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar o, a ornia, and circulated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. v Vlr 7i -" ti IA RECOMMEMDATI011 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions r approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 25 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tract to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. Analysts /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract No. 13275, located 1,200 feet east of Haven Avenue, north side of Highland Avenue, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexation 25 and setting the public hearing date for March 2, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving pro'iminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. R spectfully sub it �op1v� ry RHM :JAA :sd r Attachments A/7 ..y C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r STAFF REPORT . DATE: February 3, 1988 is T0: City Council and City Manager FAUN: Russbll H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract No. 13275, located 1,200 feet east • of Haven Avenue, north side of Highland Avenue, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexation No'. 25 and setting the date of public hearing for March 2, 1988 IA RECOMMEMDATI011 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions r approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 25 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tract to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. Analysts /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract No. 13275, located 1,200 feet east of Haven Avenue, north side of Highland Avenue, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexation 25 and setting the public hearing date for March 2, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving pro'iminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. R spectfully sub it �op1v� ry RHM :JAA :sd r Attachments A/7 ..y C RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE %;iTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAI IFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 25 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 WHEREAS, on Marni 2, 1482, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with; the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk -of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is suffic/ent, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or shoU7d•be-- - modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer'c Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o sa work and o ft he incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained to said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram shooting the Assessment District referred to and des—crTFe-crTn said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Dittrlc: are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for-Me purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District Ho. 2 Annexation No. 25 for Tract No. 13275 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1. Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all nea developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usudl maintenance, operating and servicing of street light Improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as If said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, It is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 has been demarcated into twn zones. Zone 1 is comprised et' street Tight improvements on major streets for residential improvements (singlu family, multi - family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessmem: unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Street Lighting Maintenance District - Md.. —" 2 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 25 Total_ 5800L 1,261 3 1,264 9500L 4 0 4 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800L 1,264 X S 8.93 X 12 $135,450.24 9500L 4 X $10.16 X 12 487.68 Total Annual Maint. Cost $135,937.92 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation Assessment Units this annex per page 4 - Total Assessment Units 4,651 145 4,796 2, w 3. Cost per Assessment Uait: Total Annual Maintenance Cost - $135 937.92 E28.34 /year /unit No. of n s n s rt- Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled •Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 26, Annexation No. 25. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within tha text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Iaprovments for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within We District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per..._y net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adepts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the. City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the indivlJual assessments. ;c a Zone 2 i �i .9� EXHIBIT 'A' Properties and improvements to be Included within Annexation No. 25 to Street Lighting Meintendnce District 2: Asses. No, 04 L s to be Annexed Project Acreage rnTr" Y LM TR13275 (240 9 .5) 145 3 ___ ___ Total 145 3 i ., :M 5 i i„ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2- AkNEXATION NO. 25 Pl.� L(TJTff OP RAN CHO (4117CAMONGA "i iT° 0� SAZi BBSNARDIN0 SPATS OV fl.ATT ORNIA y,� RESOLUTION NO. 'R 8'- O(o 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0; RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STPEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION 40. 25 TD STREET LIGHTING MAINTNANCE ACT OF 1972 AN T D OFFERING TIME AND PLACE AND FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of tha Streets and Highways Code of the State .f California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tion of Work: That the public interest and convenience requ�e an s e n entian of this city Connell to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance-and-- operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation Includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work 1s to be located wTihTA roadway r g -o -way enumerated to the report of the City officeeofathemCity Clerk, lentitledc' AnnexationpNowh25NtorStreetiLightinge Maintenance District No. 2 °. SECTION 3. Dese+•1 tion of Assessment District: That the contempla a wor , to a oD n ono sa y aunt is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work to pay the costs and rexpensespthereof, and twhich district iisriescribedsaas`xed follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain 'Map of Annexation No. 25 to Street Lighting Maintenance District Me. 2• maps is on file in the office of the City Clark of said City. SECTION 4. Report of_Enatneer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. *Teas approve a report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District N0. 20 is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the a=unt and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. /sy RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected T me an n a same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a repot annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a,heareng upon scld report at their first regulcr meeting in June, at which t1aa: assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time ants dace oT ni on March 7, IgBB, at T ns,n Base Line, in the City Of of Rancho Cucamon! shoo cause the district should not be formed in accords Intention. Protests must be in writing property in which each signer thereof is the same and must be delivered to the C time set for the hearing, and no other p considered. If the signer of any protes assessment roll of San Bernardino County described in the protests, then such prc written evidenre that such signer is tka herein proposed snail oe aunc on the legislature of the State of Liohting Act of 1972, being OW tiro State of California. n I Notice is hereby given that e City Council Chambers at 9161 any -and all versons• having any :ssment district, may appear spect and or carried out or why_ with "this Resolution of o estsroroob�ectionsy t^ the will be is not shown'apon the last equalised as the owner of the property _.,,._..... est must contain or be accompanied by owner of the propTIty so described. tints Act of 1972: All the work w urf> rsuance of an act of designated the Landscaping ano the Streets and HigMays Code of SECTION B. Publication of Resolution Of Intention: Published notice shall be ma pursuan o c on n e varnm —nc t ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution aid tho City Clerk shall attest to the same, and bed 30 days before the date the City Clerk shall cause the tame to be publis set for the hearing, at least once in The Oa 11 Re crt, a newspaper of g!nural circulation published Ino the eCity ofrntaar o, a ornta, and circulated in the City i CITY OF RA.'JCRO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager �•�� FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Ergineor BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. r— ginecring Aide SUBJECT: Approve to Annex Parcel Map 11236, 'ocated between Laurel Stra•. and Spruce Avenue, north of Red Oak Street, to i..reet Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 10 and setting the date of public hearing for March 2, 1988 ' RECOMMENDATION It is recoamended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Ergineer's Report for Annexation No. 10 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described parcel map to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. Aralysis /Background AttaU.ed for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's Intent to annex Parcel Map 11236, located between Laurel Street and Spruce Avenue, north ef Red Oak Street, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation 10 and setting the public hearing date ft, March 2, 1980. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's .report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers :equesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineerii.g Division. R pectfully subm 2te, /�'� l�j�Y�.C•t,. C.yrl R;IN:JAA:sd r I Attarhments ) SIe 1 RESOLUTION 00. '9'9 - ()61/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL IF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORIIIA, OF PRELIMIKkRY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT M0. 6 WHEREAS, -in March 2, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to alike and file with thr. City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and svery part of said report.js...,,, sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses oo s -wwork and of the incidental expenses in cocnection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and desc —{r 6e�in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land althin said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approvad and confirmed SECTION ?: That the proposed assessment upon the sutdivlsions of land In sa ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the Incidentdl expenses thereof, as contained to said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for Exposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. I5'J ,r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 10 for Panel Hap 11236 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in ccr.pliance with the require=nts of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highw s Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements cn major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as a;roved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the :'tbjvct tract map or development plan and the assessment 9iagram for the ex.,-t location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting Improvement on the individual development is hereby lade a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifi:s were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, remival or replacement of all or my part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. I , .. �;- SECTION 4. Estimated t No casts will be incurred far street lighting Improvement nY construction. all improvements will be constructed by developers. Dosed h an available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. i Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi-family- condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in �- this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of C! the District. - e7 Zane 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and instttutiona one acre of landectsithroughout the C1,cial and has the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. n a The estimated total cost for Street Lighting Maintenance District flo:^- Y 6 is shown below: Y. i` 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and E_ ne_ r No. of Lamps New Lamp s Lamps Annex Total r L Size• YTO ho. 10 44 5800L 4Z p 2 9500E +niigh Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800L 44 X f 8.93 X 12 $4'243.84 9500L 2 X $10.16 X 12 Total Annual Maint. Cost $4,958.88 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation 349 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 6 Total Assessment Units 355 C 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: ' Totnl Annual Maintenance Cost $4 953.68 513.97 /year /unit No. o n s n s r c— A Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as exalained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams arm attached to this report and labeled •Street Lighting Maintenance District Na. 64, Annexation No. 10. These diagr= are hereby incorporated within the f text of this report. t SECTION 6. Assessment improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for_each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units_ ppr net acre. 8 SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adapts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council alopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. r Lai EXHIBIT •A• ' Properties and Amproveaents to be included within Annexation No. 10 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: Assess. No. of Lam s to be Annexed Project Acreage �n_fi TWEE--ML PH t(, - PM 11236 Pcl 1 1.20 2.4 - -- - -- - -- -- - -- pcl 2 1_02 3_6 _ _ Total 3.02 6.0 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- W I ~, PW „1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXATION NO. 10 /lvrrr C4 pPf- �`,RB W, CITY OF RANCHO CUCMONOA PM 1 L2 3(i. COUNTY OF ME MNMWINO r, s� BTATZ OF CAL17ORNIA lai A T b +> m — RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TiME AND PLACE FOR HEARING ODJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION t. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience r IF and -fi iE in-5—nflon of this City Council to form-a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and — operation of those street tights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located w tiTi�dway r— fgTiyo - wfeenumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file to the office of the City Clerk, entitled •Annexation No. 10 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 66. SECTION 3. Descri Lion of Assessment District: That the contemplated rK. intie "op n ono sa y ounc , is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district 1s assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain 'Map of Annexation No. 10 to Street Lighting Maintenance District Ho. 6' maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Rye ar_t�of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution Ro. * has approved L e o t of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled •Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6' is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made fo^ all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. J(,3 I RESOLUTION PAGE 2 PI ^ a'.—, i . SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected ai-Ma same t me an n saae manaer as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council wit? annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first 'regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will bey determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on March X80, t a our a pm n e Ci+ Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show ca•ISe why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property ihust i thereof i interested, sufficient identify hsa ,and mbee delveredtoheCityClero said City priortoth time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objection: will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property ' -.� — described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by writter, evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described, SECTION 7. Landscaping and_Lightine Act of 1974: All the work herein propose s�iall a ne an carr a through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting A•t of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State 0 California. SECTION S. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be —ma—de pursuan o c un o t e Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of OUR o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 16 9 a' t"- E� je r ORDINANCE NO. 335 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CAUNC3L OF In CITY OF RANCHO CUCAtONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING DL9EOnMiT DISTRICT AMMMMNT 87 -30. MQUPSTINS A CHANGE IN SEX DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM NSDION -RICE AND LOW ASo:.!°RiTIAL To IINASI'RIAL SPECIFIC FLAN, LOCATED NORMOF SIR STREET. EAST OF OR07E AVENUE AND WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - AM 207 - 541 -60 AND 207 - 251 -12 WHEREAS, on the 25th day of November. 1987, the planning Comninnion held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65954 of the California Government Coda and recommended to the City Guncil adoption of c change in the district designation free NadivrHigh and Low Residential to Industrial Specific Plan. WHEREAS, on the 20th day of January. 1988, the City Council held a - - duly ■dvertisad public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Governmant Code. SECTION is The Rancho Cucamonga City Council ham made the following findingst 1. That the subject property Ss suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed liatrict in tams of access, size, and compatibility with ezintiag land "a in the surrounding areas end 2. That the proposed District Change would not hate significant impact to the environment, net the surrounding properties} and 3. That the proposed District Change is in conformance with the General plan. SECTION 2s The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and approves ianuance of a Negative Declaration on January 20. 1988. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RPSOLVEDs 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65&55 of the California Cove:nment Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 20th day of January. 1988. Development District Ameadmomt 87 -10 changing the district designation from VAdius -Righ and Low Residential to Industrial Jas' W g Ordicance No. 993 Ps 2 ' Specific Plan for those properties locate$ north of 8th Street. Out of Grove Aveano. rest of Baker Avenue and south of an existing Seat, Pe Railroad line. 166 7 2 ORDINANCE NO. 336 1 Ordinance No. 336 Page 1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY ODONCIL OF THE ^-ITT OP RANCSO COCANONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IHDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -03. REQUEST DIG AN ADDITION TO S®AM 1. LOCJ.TRD NORTH OF 8778 STRUT. BUT OF GROVE AVENUE AND WEST OF BAESA AVENUE - AM 207- 541 -60 AND 207 - 251 -12 ' WERRPAS, ou the 25th day of November. 1987, the Planning Ccemi'saion held a duly advertised public hearing perauant to Eaction 65854 of the California Government Coda and recommended to the City Council adoption of a an anandnent to the Industrial Specific plan requesting an addition to Subarea 1. located north of 8th Street, east of Crave Avenue and vast of Baker Avarua. Wasay.e, on the 20th day of Janusty. 1988, the City Council held'& duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Govern tent Code. SECTION 13 The Rancho CLeaaonga City Council has made the following flndingai 1. That tha subject property is suitable for the does pamitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land we in the surrounding areas and 2. That the proposed Amendment would not bava significant impact on the ewirnument, nor the surrounding properties= and 3. That the proposed Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucanonga City Council had found that this prujact v 11 =not a ziemifieant adverse impact on the em ir7 wnt and approves issuance of a Negative Declaration on Janusr7 20. 1988. NCW. TREMORS, BE IT RESQ.VEDt 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho LLcac+nga hereby approves on the :0th day of January, M R Inds dal Specific Plan Amendment 87 -03, addtnS •, " properties located north of Sth Street, out c' Grove, west of Baker Avon" and scath of th Santo re Railroad line to Subarea 1 of the Industrit Specific Plan. ��/ } Y' A` }1% t 4� i i i a s ORDINANCH NO. 3s, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CHCANDwk CALIFORNIA. MwDING SSECTION 10.20.010 AND SECTION 10.20.020 OF TLS RANCHO CDCAmNCA CITY CODE. REGARDING MINA FACIE SPEED LINITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals (i) California Vehicle Coda Section 22357 provides that this city Council may, by ordinance, not prima facie speed limits upou any portion of iiny street not a state bigtmay. (ii) The City Traffic Enarc*or has conducted an engiceering and traf fie survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho CLcaaoaga which streets as specified in Pert B of this Ordinance. _ (iii) The determinations concerning prize facie speed limits not forth in Part B. balm, are based upon t.S. engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ii). above. B. Ordinance IMP. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TiE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMHGA DOES HM RY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: a °.CTIOH 1: Section 10.20.010 hereby is aacadeA to the Rancho Cuumonga&t� Code to read, in words and figures, as follw•as • v ... are .eeee asset in certaL, zones. It is determined by City Council reaolutien and upon the baoia of an enginsaring and traffic inventigation that the speed permitted by state 1. upon the follmieg streets is less than is necsasary for safe operation of vehicle, ther*on by reesoL of the designation and sly posting of the streets en throne% highways and (or) by rassou of widely spaced intersections, and it is declared that the prima fade speed limit shall be met forth in this section on tboso streets or parts of streets designated in tbie section vben signs are erected gi•...g notice thereof: Declared Primn Fade Has* of Street or P.ntion Affected Speed Limit (KPH) 1. Amethyst Street — Baseline to end 35 2. Arran Route — Grove to Baker 45 3. Beryl Street — Base Lint to 800' north of Lemon Avenue 40 4. Hellman Ave. — Alta Lose Drtve to 500' north of Mzzxav1ts L`cive 35 16g Ordinance No. 337 Page 2 5. 6. Lemon Ava. - Beryl St. to Artbihald Ave. 35 7. Lmon Ava. - Seppbira St. to Jasper St. Ninth Street - 0rovd to Baker 35 S. 9. Eamem Avenna - Foothill Blvd, to 19th St. 35 35 Sapphire Street - I"= to Banyan 40 10. Vineyard Avon - Carnahan to Charcb 40 (Ord. 169 S1(part). 1982t Ord. 39B SI. 19801 Ord. 49 S5.0. 1978) (i1 The tveaty -five (25) mllas per hour speed doe, not facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic. (ii) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facia speeds which are most appropriate t� facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portion thereof. (iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said streets. _ w - (iv) 110 Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropripte signs upon asid streets giving notice of the prima facie aps,d Limit declared bersin. .RCTION 2: Section 10.20.020 hateby is amandad to the Rancho Quamon0n dZ,; Coda to read, in words and figures, an follow, 10.20.020 Decreaeo ;f state 'ow marinvm speed. It is determined by City Council resolutio, and upon 2be ■ a of m engineering and traffic investigation that the speed pemittau *v atat+ law is greater than is roaaombla or safe under the conditions found to azl,t upon such streets, and it is declared that the prima facie speed limit shall Lv as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated im this section when signs are erected giving notico hereof: i69 Name of Street or Portion Affected Declared Prins Pace Speed Limit (MR) 1. Archibald Avenue - Banyan to North and 50 2. Archibald Avenue - Fourth Street to Banyan Street 45 3. Arrow Recta - Baker to Haven 45 4. Banyan S:reat from Beryl Street to London Avenue 35 5. Banyan Street - from root City limits to Beryl Street 40 6. Base Line Road - Carnelian to Haven 40 7. Bass Line Road - Homo" to Haven 45 8. Base Line Read - Vogt City limits to Carnelian 45 9. Beryl Street - Banyan to and 45 10. Beryl Street - C00' north of lean, to Pagan 40 i69 11. Camelian Strsot - Foothill to and 12. Cacter Avenue - Poothill Blvd. to Chutch Street 13. Church Street - from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue 14. Church !treat - Haven to sin 15. Hightu itreet - Grove to Hava 16. Etivenda Avenue - Foothill to Bigblend 17. Grove tvatae - L!ghth to Foothill 18. Haven Avenue - Highlwd to Wilsm 19. Balkan Amawn - Fnathiil t.1 Alta Loma 0r. 20. Ha1Lun Avenue - 500' north of Hanranits to Vallry Vim 21. Hallman Avenue - 6th to Foothill 22. Highland Avouua - Amethyst to Archibald 23. Highland Avenue - from Archibald Avenue to Homo" Avenue 24. Highland Avenue - from Hermon Avenue to 8001 vest of Hsven 25. Hillside Road - from Reach Gate to Amotbyst Street 26. Lman Avenue - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue 27. Lemon Avenue - Jaspor St. to Beryl St. 28. San Bernardino toed - from Vinayard Avenue to Archibald Avenue 29. Sapphire Street - Aanyan to and 30. Sapphire Street - 19th t; Lemon 31. Spruce Avenue - Elm Avenc to Baas Line Rd. 32. Terra Vista rarkvay - Church to Belpine 33. Tumor Avenue - Eighth to Foothill 34. Tumor Avenue (Homo" Ave.) - Foothill to Base Line Road 35. Victoria Avenue - from Etivanda Avenue to Routs 15 36. Victoria Park Lane 37. Victoria Windrows Loop (north S south) 38. Vineyard Avenn - Church to Base Line Rd. 39. Vineyard Avenue - from 8tb Street to Foothill Blvd. 40. Whittram Avenue - Etivanda to east City Limits Ordinance Ho. 337 Pago 3 45 40 40 40 45 45 40 50 35 40 45 35 35 45 35 /10 33 35 45 40 40 40 45 45 40 35 35 40 45 40 (Ord. 169 Suction 1 (part). 19821 Ord. 39 Section 5.1. 1978). Rancho Wcamonga 5/82 124 (i) Both sixty -five (65) miles per hour and x:.ity -five (55) miles per hour are spends which are more than are reasonable or cafe; (11) The ail" per hair as stated are the prima facie 1peads which era moot appropriate to facilitate the orderly mwnwent of .r dfia and are arced limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or p,. ,10 thereof; 170 Ordinance No. 337 Page 4 (iii) The miles per hoar stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said streets; and (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate sign upon xid streets giving notice of the prima fade - speed limit declared herein. W M. N,s /7/ F� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA of STAFF REPORT L�°� ✓' DATE: January 6, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner BY: Debra Meter, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES91ENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PI Planning oomi ss on s decision approving a / foot sanctuary building and a 2300 square foot classroom building; and operation of an ex nursery and preschool on 5 acres of land in tl Residential District (less than 2 4xelling unit of the Etiwanda Soecific Plan, located at 671 Avenue - APN: 227- 061 -03 and day I. RECOMMENDATION: Uphold the Planning Commission approval of on ono se Permit 87 -05 with conditions as approved by the Commission. II. BACKGROUPD: The applicant has appealed the Planning Commission's ecTt si"ion Tor Candlt!onal Use Permit 87 -05. The applicant 1s specifically appealing two conditions of approval; Planning Division Condition No. 3 regarding the use of roof the and Engineering Condition No. 3 regarding the completion of Vista Street with a temporary cul -de -sac. III. ANALYSIS: A. Planning Division Condition Y.o. 3: •fie roofing material mist ee Me. A saryTe oi rhe material shall be submitted for Planning Division approval pricr to issuance of building permits.' The applicant is proposing a wood shake roof. Through the processing of the protect, staff believed that the use of wood Shake roofing was in compliance with the Etlwanda Specific Pi an. The 9esign Review Committee felt oiat since specific references in the Etiwanda Specific Plan refer to °shake..... roofing" for residential projects (Page 5 -43) that the architectural style, as well as all materials proposed for :he church were in compliance with the plan. /72 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CUP 87 -05 - APPEAL January 6, 1988 Page 2 However, the Planning Commission, at the meeting of November 25, 1987, was concerned about approving any project that would be contrary to their current policy which requires concrete or clay the roofing for any new projects in residential areas. Therefore, this project was approved by the Commission after they determined that the structure, even though it is within the area of the Etiwanda plan, would not be exempt from the tile roof policy. B. Engineering Ccnditlon No. 3: vista Street abutting the east_ pro ye of we pro occ Me shall be completed with a temporary cul -de -sac, 18 face radius within the existing street width, designed to the s_.Isfaction of the City Engineer. It is current City policy to extend temporary 'dead -end' stub streets upon future development or finish the stub streets with - a turn around (cul -de -sac). The installation of a cul- de-sac serves the following purposes: 1. It allows traffic to turn around without pulling into private driveways or making several manuvers within the public street. 2. It allows City street sweepers, witch require a 15' radius, to sweep the total curb length eliminating debris build up in corners. 3. It provides a finished aesthetically pleasing appearance to tho end of the street. Exhibit 'A' shows three alternatives that have been used to finish stub streets within the City. Alternative A is preferred because it provides the largest radius for veilcles to turn around, but 1s saarehat disruptive to adjacent parkways. Alternative B is less desirable for vehicle turning. but will accomcdate a street suneper and does not extend beyond the existing curbs into the parkway. Alternative C is the least disruptive to existing parkways but does not arcomodate street sweepers. The Developeris appeal letter states the following reasons for not constructing a curved curb at the end of Vista Street: 1. A circular turnaround would be inconsistent with recent decisions in that exact neighborhood. 2. The residents on the street are opposed to the circular turnaround because- (a) it eliminates good curb side Darising, and (b) it would cause an undesired traffic impact. 173 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CUP 87 -05 - APPEAL January 6, 1988 Page 3 The Developer and one of the vista Street residents presented these reasons to the Planning Comission who decided that Alternative B was most appropriate. . +' St_ff's response to the Developer's reasons for nat constructing a modified cul- de-sac: 1 1. Inconsistent with Nelghborhocd: The Developer 1s rerarr ng to a n ng owsslon decision made on October 8, 1986, relating to the,Moramn Church project o uth of located hir approximately 350 feet to the Alternative C pbeca se ofe Co�iss?o�elming the resistance of the residents to a circular finish to the street. ;w 2.a. Parking Restrictions: Alternative 0, as required, will ave 11011teu impact uptm parking because only 18' of the street frontage will be taken up with the turn around. 2.b. Undesired Traffic 1+pac:: Staff has found that in soft cases ere n s or, sax streets are under the perception that the curve will invite additional traffic to use their street to turn around. The 18' radius, used in Alternative 0, is too small to allow convenient turning of most vehicles except compact cars and street sweepers; therefore, staff feels that very few additional / vehicles will use the street. submitted, Attachments: Applicant's Letter of Appeal P anning Commission Staff Report of November 25, 1987 Planning Commission Minutes of November 25, 1987 Exhibit 'A' - Temporary Cul -De -Sae Designs 1%y 15 �r C4 ir IVVIQUIT OF PAMM RANKIW DIVISION nil clerk for the City of R&wJw rn dpi cucmwga do her►'"W that an K4kt VA 4;"Ximetely O'Cl4a 19&� (o. /p.m.), I Itsd In the C1KMw or& ff an ""s- w,i Center 0 a lettw*addr;smW te, yew jib ........... F F eA� dr Signed: Data: 4—IA.Of 2,f (REM vomn= jx ii ri NOTICE OF PUBLIC 16ARM RANCHO C1ICAM0M,GA CITY COUNCIL The Rancho Cucamnga City Council will be holding public hearings at ::30 pa, on February 3, 1988 at the Lions Part CWMMty Building located at 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, to consider the following described project(s): cn„w.m.an�.u. naiwscn� na, LLunua �avnn. Ux rcnnal 01-1n appeal w respect a use of roof tj go and-Ume—c-a—ppTetion o Ylsta Street with a temporary cul -de -sac, for the w development of a 4,900 square foot sanctuary building and a 2,300 square foot office and classroom building on 5 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwa da Specific Plan, located at 6723 Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 227 -061- 3 Anyone having concerns or qMtions an any of the above items are nelczs to contact the City Planning Diviilon at (714) 98961861 or visit tie offices located at 9340 one Line Read, Unit B. LL Also, ar,7oma objecting to or in favor of the above, may appear in person at the abase - described setting or may submit their concerns in writing tithe %arming Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to said u9- January __ , 1938 Rancln Cucamonga City Council / 7(p 1 'N Cross a f Crown it aacir�o Lutheran Churr4m of MCHOCOCAMOKCA ADMINISTRATIONifpr..n of Rancho qCucaM40n9aQEG04jqq7 Richard A. Nelson, Pastor December 4, 1987 CM OF RancL, Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJWr: CONDITIONAL USX PERM 87-05 - CIM i CR M To Whom It May Concern, , r• The above project was approved at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission meeting of November 25, 1987. Although,as of today, we have received no copy of the resolution, we vich to appeal two ammend2eot3 to the original resolution that were mad* at that meeting. Having no numbers or pagan to refer to from approved resolution, please allow us to relate to these two items by neae. Our first condition that we want to appeal regards the change of our roofing materiel from a heavy, Grade A. wood shake to a concrete or tile to "simulate" a shake look. It should be noted that the wood shake, as submitted, does meet all demands of code, and has the highest possible burn rating. Both the Design Review Committee and the city staff (including Fire Dept.) approved of our use of this material. Architecturally, we feel the use of anything less natural will definitely take away from the integrity of "Earn" style. We feel we have complied with the spirit and letter of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and we make reference to the following sections in this Specific Plan: Page 5-40, item .202... "traditional, rather than contemporary" "rustic, rather than polished" Page 5-43, item .702c... "rustic, informal" .703 .... " ... shall be consistant with design theme." Page 5-45, see the pictures 6 item .802, regarding "Barn Style" Page 5-47, paragraph 4 8 item 5.52 regarding meeting "fire protection standards ". Our second appeal regards the ruling that we would construct a "modified culdesac" at the rear of our property line at Vista St. Not only is it inconsistent with recent decisions in that erect neighborhood d building protects, the neighbors are strongly opposnl to doing this. A curved culdesac eliminates good curbside parking for those neighbors and spells "a tun - around for traffic " —as It will be the only ouch culdesac 1:. t!.et neighborhood. We agree that the residents should not axperience this undesired impact on their neighborhood d traffic. We would prefer to land- scape the area immediately seen from the end of Vista along our block wall and leave the street the way its been for over 22 years! Thankyou for giving these appeals your consideration, vnd we await word on when we should appear for the hearing. ' Sincerely.4 IWI N/L— R-3v. Richard A. Nelson, Pastor 977819th Street a Stator 810a Center. 19Ih8Archftld s Rancho Cucamonga. CA91701 • (714)989.4991 177 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT S 4N a � DATE: November 25, 1987 W7 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Nater, Associate Planner SUBJECT: EMVIRONHFJiTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -OS UWW4a ,a, � rWIn Um R - rropcsai Ln outlJ a roat foot office and classroom building; and 2,300 teuaan operate in extended 'day nursery and preschool or? S acres of land in the Vary Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwands Specific Plan, located--at--: - 6723 Etiwanda Avenue - APN 227- 061 -03. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: AFproval of sito plan, conceptual grad(n9 p an'-7 cnncep{'ZZandscape plan, building elevations, prosclool activities and issuance of a Negative Declaration for development of the Cross and Crown Lutheran Church. B. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin AorttTi� en an Gr ou e"rac111ty; Etlwanda Specific Plan South - Existing Single Family Residential with horse corrals; Etlwanda Specific Plan East - Existing Singie Family Residential; Etlwanda Specific Plan West - Vacant Land; Etlwanda Specific Plan C. General Plan Designations: Prq)ect —Site -_V*rY_LQ_wlhefts lty Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Density Residential (less that 2 dwelling units Per acre) South - Very Low Density Residential (Tess than 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) X78 ITEM N PLANNING COHNISSI, STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -D5 - CROSS 6 CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH Wovember 25, 1987 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The current use of the site is citrus grove. Tne na ura ground slopes north to south, at an "Proximate 3 percent grade. Them are four pale trees along Etivand4 Avenue frontage which are protected as historical landmarks. There are Eucalyptus windrows along the north, east and south boundaries (the row along the south boundary is off - site). E. Parting Calculations: Number of Kumber of Type Parking Spaces Spaces Of Use Ratio Required Provided Church 1 per each 4 fixed seats Preschool 1 for each staff amber Plus 1 per eac9 5 children II. ANALYSIS: 200 seats so 68 provided Approximately 35 68 100 children, 15 staff A. General: The applicants sre proposing to develop the front 'F'st of the 5 acre parcel. The present development includes a church nanctuary with additional classrooms and offices in a detached structure. Besides normal church activities, they also pian on operating a daily preschool facility. Initially, the preschool will be established for approximately 30 children. If the program is successful they could receive Stata approval for approximately 100 chiiaren. Ample parking is provided for such activities. Ail other aspects of the preschool facility must moot State standards and regulations. The applitants have provided a list of all proposed oetivities (see Exhibit 'F'). The site is within the boundaries of the Etlwanda Avenue Overlay District of the Etlwnda Specific Plan. As such, $Peetal landscape and setback standards have been applied to this project. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Emerick, o )s oy, o mean rerfewed this project on November s, 1987. The Cosittte found the project to be censisteit with the goals of the Etlwanda Specific Plan and recommended approval subject to ttt following conditions which have been included to the attached Resolution: 179 PLANNING COMIISSI STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -05 - CROSS A CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH November 25, 1987 Page 3 1. The Committee recommended that vista Street be improved with a &edified cul -de -sac. However, the Committee recognized that the issue may need discussion by the full Commission based upon any public feput received at the hearing. The applicant's would also like to construct a block wall stress the end of vista Street to prevent oa -sfte vanda'.1sa and duping. 2. The perimeter block wall should be constr.•cted at the north and south property lines to the point were Phase I development ends. Any future developmznt of this site would require expansion of the perimeter block wall, 3. All windows of each building should be multi- - paned. 4. The wood shingle roofing should be treated with a fire retardant substance. S. The applicant should submit for Planning Division approval samples of roof material, siding and rock. Also, the applicant should prepare a test panel of the rock venter for review by the :Pl Min Division to verify quality of rock teriat and workmanship. C. Technical Rt'vlew Cooltte9: The Committee reviewea the project an n a . w the, recoemmnded- conditions of approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and project Environeantal Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been cow e e Y e pp can Staff has completed Part II of the Enaroruental Checklist and found no significant lapad s on the environment as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Etiwanda 4laeent an an a General Plan, and will not be detrimental to adjacent or cause significant adverse impacts. The proposed use, building design, together with recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with all applicable regulations of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. PLANNING COM ISSL 1TM-F REPORT CUP 87 -05 - CROSS A CROWN LUTW" CNWRCH Novaaber 25, 1987 Page .? IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This itao bas been advertised as a ppublic bearing nii r. newspaper, the property posed, and notices sent to a props zy owners within 300 foot of the project site.' Y. REC0OMMATION: Staff 'recommends that the Planning Co"Jision app v oral Use Per%it 87 -06, subject to all conditions of approval, through adoption gf the attached Resolution ant issuance of a Negative Declaration. Res ful ly ' ub Mad, 8ha le City anner 88:ON:te Attachunts: Exhibit 'A' - Site Utilization rap Exhibit 08" - Site Plan Exhibit 'C' - Landscape Plan Exhibit 'D" - Building Elevations Exhibit 'E. - Building Elevations Exhibit •F` - Statment of Activities Resolution of Approval with Conditions F � Y� _ V .. � .. _ SCI• E", 1 I Al 1 �� I r �r I61 1 CITY OF rrEM, �i RANCHO CUCAMONGA , r]z �Ja. Pt ANNM3 MISICrI FxHltur. scAm n ,,,n- n iuLi ,�CPff •�••, L . J �••.,..� ate.— ...... �...��... W•- j CITY OF rmNt. �oB7 -QS RANCHO CUCANIONUA rm.E+ SigYG x!1/7 PLANNING DI\1)12^ EXFl19T: _ f!__ SCALE - i %r3 N 60 ci s 1 �Y �'� } •� .1..: f..'�f w-ten 4 I key wv � / � � SI rMaW `4wgwr sn ! a p r .p�wY. ww�rn.ws 7'41 'F'ti L _ ,► S .. S •ro.c•�w.rw�ss �0 1Mr:gwvp+�n�c r+„r YY4(►wf vPr Nom CITY OF rrE,,\,, e,7� R AMM CUC'A.N10\GA TM-E, it.�d n P[ aNV'i1f; DIN-1-11- EXHIBIT- (p:, i C I _in" A J +� NCA" CITY OF aw. ALIP 81-45 _,_, RANCHO CUCA ?iQNUA TME, dui /�1in4Olerati.?7 PLANNING DIVLq N E.XHIBiT, 47 SC;AL6 - j a 1 CITY OF rrE.tl ei RA1�UHO CLVt1VTONGE� Tff1E•��,�Ef2i��/s,'rj �t PLANNING DIMT Er•4irrl _ �� -- `c' i` -'-_ -• ;, 186 f):� • =z� of !ttgncho Cucamonga ww'�ud statrm mt of artivit im abdttrd Ibmbr 5,19M. Asmts abrlar stumanc :eaiw:d by city on 5/7/87. "Proposed Lutheran Cbunh: saw -Ivory, suit! - purpose apace, Office aid Education bulldiagm, anti par ial; lots at 6723 Etivardm Avenue." STATE XT OF 7.ClIV19TFS The proposed activities and uses ft: this facility in tollovisg itemt 1. Worship Sorvicea 2. Sunday School 3. Nursery Cars 4. Educatinu, tc limlode daily pro - school 0 eatanded 5. Bible Study Clasen* 6. Fallovahip sweats 7. Management osetiogm 8. Chair reluwsalA 9. Junior sigh 8 Senior Sigh youth groups 10. Church staff/Daily business 11. Community events, meotdnts, g service: Proposed hours of operation-are as follom Sunday: 8:00ra to 9:001c Monday: 7:30= to 9:OOpm Tuesday: 7 :30aa to 9:00pa Wcdaesday: 7:30as to 9:00pa Thursday: 7:3Osm to 9:00pn Friday: 7:300 to 9:COpm Saturday: 9:OOr to Noon NvAber of membaro: Existing... 165 baptized (55 featly watu) 5 year projeetioa...400 baptized (130 fmily unite) Thare is no proposed fume use of the remelnitg grove otbmr than as 8ppearu on the plane suboitted. Any future development, planned and unplanned, will be wusietent vith current toning. CROSS and cash UnMAM CWCS of gaucho Cucamonga ,�xhibi t f By: 441 787' Rv. Rfdr:d A. Hake], Putor 9776101h81ne1 0 StA:QBros Centar• 1ethA ArrhU,.U+ o.....h...•....- ........ rh no,n, - .e..Gnen .aw RESOLUTION NO. 87 -209 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNINS COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87 -05 FOR A PROPOSAL TG BUILD A 4,000 SQUARE FOOT SANCTUARY BUILDING AND A 2.300 SQUARE I'00T OFFICE AND CLASSROOM 'BUILDING; AND OPERATE AN MENOED DAY WXSERY AND FRESCHOOL ON 5 ACRES OF LAND IN ThE VERY 1.04 DENSITY RESICEUTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 OWELLM UNITS PER ACRf.) OF THE ETIWANOA SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED AT A723 ETIWANOA AVENUE - AON 227- 061-03 A. Recitals. (1) Cross and CrctP Lutheran Church has filed sn application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Formit No. 87-05 as a /scribed to the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, tho :,ibject Conditional Use Parait request is referred to as 'the applic -Ition'. (11) On the 25th of November, 1S07, the PlannihV Commission of the City of poncho Cucamonga conducad a duly noticed public hearing on the appllcetton and concluded said hearing on that ,ate (111) All legal prerequisites to th- Qoptlon of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution. NOU, THEREFORE, it 1s hereby Wnd, Satermined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- rtferanced public hearing on Noverbar 25, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Co aisslcn hereby specifically ,Inds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 6723 Etlwanda Avenue with a street frontage of 331.18 feet and lot dfpth of 662.70 feet and is presently improved with. rock curb which must be restored per the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and g2rden /greenhouse facility, property to the north of the subject site is a rural single family resinces,prthe property toouthe e2 t s sexistingisingle family residential, and the property to the west is vacant parcels. i�a 7 PLANNING COMMISS. . RESOLUTION NO. CUP 87-05 - CROSS 8 CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH November 25, 1987 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission. during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes ss follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the Ftiwanda Specific Plan and General Plan tie objectives of tt:a Development Code, aria the ptwurposos of tie 01str(ct in which the sits is licated. (b) That the proposed use toyather with the conditions applicable thereto will not be detrimental to the public hasith, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. - �— — - Ic) That ti.d proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwavda Specific Plan. a. this Commission, hereby finds and certifies that the project has bean reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmeital Quality A:t of :970 and, further, this Com;;Issicn hereby issues a Negative Declaestion. 5. Based open the findings and conclusion~ sat forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves t!i, application subject to each aid ovary condition set forth below and 4a tae attached StanOard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division (1) The perimeter block wail shall be constructed at M north aid south property lines co the point were Phase I Jsvelopment ends. Any future development of the site will require extension of the perimeter block call. (2) All windows of each building shall be multi- paned. (3) The roofing material must be tile. A simple of the material shall be submitted for Pianninj Division approval prior to issuance of building perwits. (4) The applicant shall submit for Planning Division approval sa.^pl�s of siding and rock prior to issuance of biildlny peraitc. Also, the applicant snail prepare a twst pane: of the rock veneer fc. review by the planning pivision during constructen to verify quality of rock material and workmanship. a PLAININa COMMISSI RESOLUTION NO. CUP 87 -05 - CROSS S CROW LUTHERAN CHURCH November 25, 1987 Page 3 Engineering Division (1) The existing Cure mod gutter on Etfwendt Avenue shall be removed and replaced per City Standard for Cobblc Curb Gutter 307). end (No. (2) The existing overhead utilities (telecom mnnicatiens and elmctria)) on the protect side of Etiwanda Avenue -hall be underSeounded from the first pole off site north of the pr0ect's r3rth bou'dary to the first polo off site south of the project's south boundary, prior to public lmproemnant accaptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The dwvcloper say Inquest a roiubursement agreement to recover one -h.Ilf the City adopted cost for under rounding fe.3 suture devolopment (redevelopmShO it as occurs ^�^ on the opposite side of the street. (3) Via" Street abutting the east property lino of .ee project site shall be completed with a temporary cul- de -se:, 18 foot radius within the nAisting street width, designed to the satisfaction o7 the City Engineer. 6. The Oeputy Secretary to this Commission sa.11 certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AW A'MFTEO THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA I, Brad Buller, Oeplity Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mating of the Planning Commission held 01 the 25th dev of November, 1987, by t've fallowing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS. CHITIEA, NCHIEL, BLAKESLEY, EHERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY %96 __ � \ . a � § � a | ` !j = i I I Nu I , | - bill , -£ . iv a I] . ■�,�. !� ; /� ;,|�� T| ,RA_ /� -. j ■ k� .� 2 | � |\ k11 /§! k. a .v - � &�d� ~ \ j , | = • ■.| s ! l a|!! |! ¥ | ! Ull |,. %_ | • X22| � � \ $ | £@!! �� , � ■!7 | \)\ } < j. • . 491 � ! a| I !■ »� { | |q, ! sr � q ■� ,� � ■ gin\ .e# | | N q ,: ; ; "| -!I ! , |�f��l � �i� ■p �■ � )� ! fit Ctalit - R =! ! lilt | # !," r �f | z& ■d !� :£ /t \! Z: �■ |� |s �� | |q�: |t� R �` Ha ■ _ # ■�� e� | �| | � �� C�,�:J� ■ @ |#5l�. WE ■ | . , a | |/ � � | \ �; SIFT : f J- ! `§| !!c- ,b= �• \- [gills, | | |§-| - Wo Ir , #£ E �g�. /� -! | R i q| |i W 3: l 19 ?�- � ; P \« t. tit V n ?aa�q•a S! -assi� ;;.stool 5 Wit-0�A Si'y r 10—Al Lklp = 11ai i� atial UIN1i- !lIIa, ` {i is r i er II = = nas a 8 li 7.a ds ? �F ;i all 1 if _� _l �J 31 -, "z rY 7 ev INS + <s;q; a �y j it ifi�i is y� a 3sia /rria Yy! f N IM M i93 aIni r Jill 3_Trs a 4ijr iia l i «iia _.It 5 , Iiii all' UN al s�_�s a1 !E iT$,a 1 : i- I 3 144 =- idii °ia s as layy as " L=ii1 «it Y -t Ij 2 58 li sz 1H _; se iris �n I, � a� +s o` i n ?aa�q•a S! -assi� ;;.stool 5 Wit-0�A Si'y r 10—Al Lklp = 11ai i� atial UIN1i- !lIIa, ` {i is r i er II = = nas a 8 li 7.a ds ? �F ;i all 1 if _� _l �J 31 -, "z rY 7 ev INS + <s;q; a �y j it ifi�i is y� a 3sia /rria Yy! f N IM M i93 aIni r Jill 3_Trs a 4ijr iia l i «iia _.It 5 , Iiii all' UN al s�_�s a1 !E iT$,a 1 : i- I ii3=�i: =- s as layy a rrbs L=ii1 it -a- 'I a io isaz a�s Jim fs¢ :=a siS fir I t Y a4 L� iti :� r i3 i1�1 � = �= "E FsF .� sod lit or Ir ll all # a -_ tsr his a ii 1 a gis! r i e ME a ng� r E s i �ar� �i i►a - Es - s ". a . ar sri- �.'s •:;r i � of .,� yin !a r ji�Rt 13 _ Ell I _t ar Q i=ii si' j�ry r a€ fill Pro �fi =a ?Kill s 3 3 u I 1�1f frl� ia- is��r $ C �Cos fita" Err a I� e i� Bsa I�s,ai �� i � I r jasr p v 31 gits it Musa a sr ! lag Mak, 93t a a $ y a i• !!� _ � i�r� �8 � �k�a r�s st�j !P• � r !_i 1 :� IT t�pp a i jsat 32�� yst FI a a ,I �� j� s� J� ;9 a= ti S!•i ea n lira 1jIQ i9�r= :j a s fie #� t = sa Itad ri_ , it aF a at� sal - a €�� salt is t !- `� # t# Ya $I it s1 Baal. s II N2 aaga !s r� a° ' = s�S: is I t =$H s•�I fnsit SI a� s� =�'i ti i��:•t a'� '� s ��' ��ia� �Y�na iri- i`�J� I! ! sza - °Z jo= IT s a �. [ 3e �I- 3'P 'S _p y Ej =a ii I j s:ti 'aa =_as i• t� 13 icH� �s �•� a I ai dsrss �e s�Ha IY Y •� �I �I �I '��, � •�I ��YI y. �I INNER I \�fl . \ \RR; 11/P!|A|1 / |I'. ' r` J if JU h. . # % log .s- ■� q % | Vila I� =l! -o` �■R��:9�| {1| � � Igro'v k � �| � ■t » , ��| !�- S • ■_� e■ §� % 'mIN\ � \\I( \ q; fi`� |f q=| || X99 ,! ■ | # ig |! !� |�. | &A �! � r £ � |� . � 4r| /= it ! ! � s� |��b•�k� � : . �j / \% E�` Af ■ q ■ | @� ! q ■ �C ,� |� | 1 / 1. � lif- \ at � ■� ! . � -�J . ■�� # |J nS� , Ill = • R � F k R� F ! � t !gag £ � r M& � § � k / \ �| it ■� , .. . b � | � | � 'mIN\ � \\I( \ q; fi`� |f q=| || X99 ,! ■ | # ig |! !� |�. | &A �! � r £ � |� . � 4r| /= it ! ! � s� |��b•�k� � : . �j / \% E�` Af ■ q ■ | @� ! q ■ �C ,� |� | 1 / 1. � lif- \ at � ■� ! . � -�J . ■�� # |J nS� , Ill = • R � F k R� F ! � t !gag £ � r M& � § � k / \ $ $ � � � i 2 � � z � / : � .# j q J C� � ;. U} !s� ■� In! 6. ! § a� �! qƒ m| _ J! &■ \ | /!| ! e! ! !P.§ . �qi Wit i -b, I I / ! 2/ 12 � �| ■/ & .: OT It, ! T \ �f |!| -a� ilk � '� ■�I j |.| j As 197 ! 2/ 12 �| ■/ & .: OT It, ■E � -a� ilk j j j i I I DRAFT FO? DISC:USSICN PUf3PCSCS ONI -Y Comvlssl r Chit' monad to refer This project to tha Design Review Coraiittee, Camissloner Emerfcl, seconned the station. Notion carried by the followl vot*: AYES: COMA IONFAS: CHIYIEA, EKCRICK, BLAK1'SLEY, MCNIEL NOES: COVIN SIC AS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS �"l.TOLSTOY Commissioner Ererick asoved 1% continue Item N to the January 13, 1988 meetingg Commissioner Chltica` mended the motion. Notion carried by the following vote. AYES: COMMISSIORERS: EMEIIICK, C IL , BLAKESLEY, MMCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; TOLSTOY ' • • a " ' -- carrleti N. E4VIROHENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -05 -CROSS A sanctuary boiTding -and a 2,+00 square foot office and classroom building, and opsrate an axtettdad day nursery and preshcool an 5 acres of land in the Very Law Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwands Specific Plan, located at 6723 Etiwanda Avenue - APR: 227 - 061 -0? Debra Meier, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Chltlea questioned why the wood shingle roofing 1s allowed. Debra Meier, Associate Planner, stated that to Oeslggn Review wood shingle roofing is specifically referred to to the Etiw:tnda Specific Plan. With that In mitd, Doslgn Review agreed to tiq wood shingle roofing in this project. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, clarified that word shingle roofing is one of the materials encouraged by the Etiwanda Specific Plan in keeping with the rustic, rural characteristics of Etiwarda. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. William Runyan, designer, stated the applicant concurs with most of t7te conditions of the staff report. The applicant did question the possibility of the cul -de -sac and after polling the neighbors of this project, they would not be supportive of cul- de- sating off the street at this time. The applicant proposes to construct a masonry block w811 on the property line from corner to corner on the east cdrnar. Planning Cummission Meeting - 10 - November 25, 1987 DRAFT FOR DISCL ISION :PURPOSES ONLY ' Reverend Richard Nelson, Pastor of the Cross d G dm Lutheran Church, stated his concern about VOU Street and the cu -de -sac. They would - not like U incur the expense. Mr. David Long, 13201 Vista Street, Etiwands, sZited Im does not like the cul -de -sac. He would like to do what was lone on the other two streets with the LDS Church with the block wall Mr. Long stated he would get a petition with the support of his neid bom opposing the cul- de -sac and supporting the block wall. Russell Maguire, City Engineer, clarified a msdifltd cul -de -sac does not encroachment onto anyone's property and does net expand the right-of- way. The 18 foot radius is fit into the roadway Mr. Runyan statod the applicant is only develoMing 1/3 of the property now but intend to maintain the remaining back portion as a grove. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. toxnissioner Chitiea stated a standard block wall has a ver unfinished appearance and is not as aesthetically cally pleasing. Ms. Chittea ate—` that even a modified cul -de -sac sakes the better turnarounds. Coomissioner Chitiea expressed concern about the wood shingle roof and unless it was fully firm sprinkled, she would not support the wood shingle but rather prefer tile. Commissioner Biakesley stated his concern About the windrow bounding on both sides of the properties and the wood shingle roofing. he would like to see some fire retardant properties used and not expose the windrow to this possibility. Comissioner Blakeslay concurs with Commissioner Chitfaa regarding the modified cul -de -sac. Commissioner Emeriek questioned the designer's justification with the wood shingle roof and the public safety issue of using fire retardant wood shake as opposed to tile. Chat man McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Runyan designer, state4 that fire retardant authentic wood shinglat are available and does noL see from a building and safety view that as long as they are UL rated, there shouldn't be a problem. The fire departcent is also satisfied with the proposed wood shingles as there are five on -site fire hydrants. Furthermore, the Etiwanda Specific Plan does specifically address the use of wood shingles as a roofing material. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that a treated wood shingle would never meet the same standards as a concrete tile or clay tile, but it does, as the orchitect stated, met the minimum Building Safety standards for fire protection. This would be precedent setting on any future site. Planning CouMitsion Meeting - 11 - I;ovember 25, 1587 ' /9? 1 -r, DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Mr Runyan stated tho building has been designed to meet the gal of Etiwanda Avenue. Commissioner Emerick stated the proposed project would upgrade the &esthetics of the area and since wood shake fs specified in the plan, he would support the project. Comissioar Ent.Nck concurs with the prior comments on the cu - de -s&c. Chairman. McNiel stated he supports the codified cul-de-sac. Chairman McNiol feels the shake single, though it is consistent with the code, it is irconsistent with the current tile roof policy of the Commission. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. i Pastor Nelson auestionad whether the modified cul -de -sac eliminated the block wall. K. Chairesn NcNiel stated that the curb is rou.ided off, there may be landscaping and partially walled. Russell Maguire, City Engineer, r_odiffed the wording in Conditien'3, page 11 -13, under Enyineerin to read "...project site to be completed with n minimal cu7-oq -sac -18 foot radius within the existing street j width, designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.' Commissioner Chities moved to approve the resolution as modified with the wood shingle changed to concrete tile and the modified cul -de -sac. Chairman McNiel seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, MCNIEL, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMIISSIONERS: TOLSTOY ♦ • * It * -- carried 0 ..- ....,,,u„r - n maivans.ai suooivision ano t'esign review or a =yes. a,v s on on 4.49 acres of lard within the Low Density ial strict (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located on the e of w RouU +/- SSO feet vast of Sftrra ;%dre - APN: 2. Assoc ted w�th the project is a Tree Removal Permit. Debra ssociate Planner, sented the staff report. ComiBlakesley questioad if utilities are in the backyard of thg property and the ones to built. Debra ated yes. Planning Commission Meeting - 12 - \ November 25, 1987 .200 c I I o' a c N C0 O L 8 C M E - f o o C Y 9 L •�� o -_r Y C yG H ! W ?� s s Y N Y L C A O t N a y H Y.` - f o o _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ •� s Y 9 L m M yG H ! s Y N Y C A O y H Y.` G Y W Y W 6 u a P W 6 G tl P v H< a � ] j Y V 2 NO N O EV 6 W 1 Y C yy � ] Y � M y v U � � a Y r � � W C N H Y A • 1� Myy O O A , ao -- z o �y Y t� y H Y.` Y W �1� W 6 H 6 G H< Y 2 N O Y l 6 W 1 a a ] r � Y Y N z o �y I 11 DATE: TD: FRDFf: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT February 3, 1988 City Council anC city Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Joe Stcf1, Jr,, Associate Civil Engineer Envfronm..,._. _ RE0@IENQAT1QY: NO Action PN ^ZOgsoutheast 262_13), February 3 219 1988 the City Council continued with Information to the Counciat, request that staff the Appeal to Staff has Provide additional from the received a letter dated January 27 underground applicant requesting to withdraw Therefore existingg overhead 'he Appeal al requiring ping exist tn ' staff recommends that utilities ADpeal requiring upheld. Conditions of Approval action be along 7th Street. Pproval from the Piann ngn and thus the n9 Commission be The City Attorney has indicated that the any Jurisdiction !n this matter. City Council does bes not have RHM:JS:dlw Attachment: Exhibit •A. QARY MITCHELL ✓t ASSOCIATES - - - - -__ LAND PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING 1170 LASE JNI, eU1TE 203 . RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 01:01. PHONE �— January 27, !988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTN= MR. JOE STOFA ENGINEERING DIVISION 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 RE= WITHDRAWL OF APPEAL FOR CALIFORNIA FINISHED METALS Dear Mr. Stofa= \a I Indicated to you yesterday by telephone, we are hereby formally withdrawing our app= /al filed on behalf of --- Callfornla Plead ut Metals relative to the uidergrcunding of certain overhead utlilty lines as rt,qulrcd by the City Planning Commlsalon. Mr. Lee Memencver of California fully hwithetheacondltldonasofma that they Intend to C:ty Planning Camp salon !n t approval as promuJ development review for heir aPPcnvat �� gated by the this Project, the minor Thank you application. for your assistance in Processing this 0 GM1ra Truly yours, GARY MITCHELL b ASSOCIATES G / / Cary tc ell President cc= Mr Lee Hemenover Of Callfornla Finished Metal, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENOMEMW(i D_IMON �3 of. :Ili - aeo -090f CITY Od RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February L ry' 3. 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller. City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn . Code Enforcement Supervisor SUBJECT: �ROIRMENTAL ASSESSMENT AlPJ DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENURENi llw T7TD� o ,e - amen n c on lot and sidewalk sates Ye owe" ode ertainin p 9 to parking �• RECQMMaIpATtON: The Planning Commission recommends a s eve oPment Code Amon�nt• If the Cit _ O Issuance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of pproval of Ordinance would be In order. y Council concurs the attached II. BACKGRUUYD: This Development Code Amendment is to response to the Parking lot and sidewalk sales to revise regulations for Commissioa�retation of these r" gust, 1987 staff The Plannin regulations by the requested regulations did not clearly Identify determined Planning permitted sales or the relationship the frequency and duration tof businesses located within a sho p °f sales activity PPing center. y between Staff was directed to prepare an amendment which intent of these provisions, specificaily: would clarify the I The linking of approvals to business locations; Z• Encouraging multiple businesses within shopping centers to participate concurrently in sales events; J• from LIr n of the minimum time period be sales f, days to 30 days, and 4 Limiting the total time for an approved sales event to three consecutive days. III. ANALS_ Zwiz The Planning Cocmissfon reviewed and reccnmended approval of this amendment on January 13, suggested to clarify regulation of Parking following language on private c°mmercfal /retail lot and sidewalk sales Property within the City: aoy �. CITy -COU.M rp2ry �ta1 57,E REPORT Feb Asessment d DCA 80 31988 -01 Pa,a p Section (Lva 2. Ptrktn-1 Lot and Sidewalk Sales. Parking lot and s ++c sa as may a Perre'it%e� an Private property in retetl /w�hojesal,4rbusinessesslocated City, including areas, to connection With cu within industrial subject to the approval of scent on_sita businesses, provided in Section 17.04a Temporary Use Permit as criter.a: and the following +• Each sale is limited consecutive days; to a maxtaaae of three (3) b. No sale for any single busfr�ess or any other within sae shaDPt^gdcenter , he shall m be lot or parcel, or thirty (30) days of another sale; Permitted within C. A maximum of three (3) sales shall be permitted for YJ each business duri (1) addi ng each calendar year; however, one tloaal sale may be permitted for any business located within a shopping center provided that at thest ffft participate t50%) of the businesses occupying concurrenty in such sale; d• The apf1plicant for such sale must obtain the written author atfon at lea owner and east Provide proposed Parcel. l' all other business OnAthepsame that a or within the same s�iopptng center, conducted Parking lot or sidewalk sale will be the times it will be conducted and that no other sale within thirty (30) days of such sale will be permitted, e, The items to be sold shall be of the same type that are regularly displayed and sold at the rosiness location; f• The activity shall not Present a hazard to pedestrians or encroach on a required building exit; g• Safe vehicle ingress and egress shall be Provided at all times; and h. Adequate Parking shall be provided and maintained during the course of the activity for both the business of the aPPlicant and all other businesses on the same lot or parcel or within the same shopping center, Po--T �. .� CITY COONCIC' STAFF REPORT 1' :°'; p er =: I; Envlronaental Assessment ; " February 3, 1988 DCA 88-01 Page 3 IV. CDRPESPOMDEUCE; Re it'* was advertised as a Public ear ng n _ oily Rirt newspaper. Y• FACTS FOR FlKDIR65: Be fore approving the Development Code will not be 4etrl�..il W prdetermine or at the environmental impacts. In addition, ;he proposal must be consistent with Development Coda. the Intent of the Be"eral Plan and th. Rq. ec iy su' d, X? Bra Buller City Planner BB:RA:ns -«.-- - Attachments; Mpinlnutes nnfng Commission Staff Rsport, January 13, 1988 OF the January 13, 1988 planning Commlssion Meeting Planning Commission Resoluttmn 88-10 Cfty Council Ordinance A_tFlfMifYT � JtAMtI� ola n Cyabn4I d0 ufI clerk for the Cl of M"by'weer that 011 w i7iBtho CUCSDMP BrafilS' pmold'oft lA�d'at CO�nU,Cr ONwI.� o letter AdC UW ttoo :: eiG4)o- 1040O1 Wsttnas tM I ."Y ULEAM Wft -7Rt stfittri�p r90•/ v � i• NOTICE OF DU3LIC F RAMCRO CLCAi0NGEARrN6 CPTY COUNCIL The RP.M. Cu caaron,a C1CY Counei; dill be ho)din located P.M. on FcbruarY 3. 1999 at the Lions park C located at 9161 B +se Line Road, 9 Public hear,",, at I consider the folloding described prajec (uc""9a, California tY 9173pdito Drglett(a); Anne having concerns or � tlacme to 1 iY plann7 on any estaea _ Also the 9346 Dasn Line Road, Unit B� ) 96J -1801 or visit at tho �ve_aWcrii ^9 to or in favor of the feet nog, plants bed ion, testing City a t thN� c Pe to person ^9 Division Rancho Cueaa�onga prior 01rt30d January�88 to said Rancho Cuca400ga City council 203 this particular structure look more softened and it 11 another window to the Ctty, more attractive since Commissioner EmerfCK stated that though the benefits of landscaping in now may seem wall, the landscaping does have a chance to start to grow, putting the lan ionar the tandscaping n Blakesley ow. stated he did not see any henefit from delaying the Chairman MCNie, concurred with Commissioner Blakesley, Commissioner Chines moved to approve the Conditional Use Pertmlt, COmfssfoner Blakesley seconded the motion. Motfon carried a the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL, To,:- T NOES: COMMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE COMIssioner Tolsto --Carried Industrial Specific moved o�nd a proval to the C1 seconded the motion. MOtiun carried by - OfolloCo Commissioner Council ey on Blakesley AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TGLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Q• -- carried - •� m.ucamorgiOe;olofAent Code nc w Seca on sidewalk sales. pertaining to parkin �m 9 lot mu1 Richard Alcorn, Code En1'erwordit Supervisor, to t report. Staff would add tha wording •an private property on Section 2 If the Ordinance. he staff Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Commissioner Blakesley, stated that the Commission had earlier discussion regarding if there acre going to be sidewalk sales that advanced notification fodr the lother there frequency. He suggested that more than one participants would be advised. Planning Comafsslon Minutes -12- January 13, 1988 aoq ■ Commissioner Tolstoy sts:ed there should be a time specific for a 5 business to notify the other businesses in the center at least 30 days in advance of the sale. t Commissioner Emerick stated he agreed that 30 days prior to the actual date cf the sale. f, Chairun McNiel stated that application of the temporary use permit be ,r made 30 days prior to the actual date of the sale. ` Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, suggested the verbage of at least 30 days prior to the proposed sale an the resolution. Commissioner Blakesley caved to approve as amended, Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, TOLSTOY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL P NOES: COMMISSIONERS: WOKE 3 ABSENT: C0114IS5IONERS: NONE - • + * * :o-• -- carried 1 BHSINESS R. 2WOlFrcmnji Tn TNr rrunfrrnue nr w an existing structure in the Heavy Industrial Land Use District (Subarea 15) located at 12459 Arrow Highway - APN: 229 - 131 -33. Cindy Norris, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Comissioner Chitiea questioned the location of the slag pile and the height of the slag pile. Cindy Norris responded that the slag pile is located outside the easement about one -third of the Way down. The slag pile is approximately 15 -20 feet in height. Chairman McNiel questioned how closr, to the property line is the slag pile and what the relationship is to the water easement. Cindy Norris responded that it is an access area of approximately ten feet betweer. the chain link fence and the to of the slag pile. The water easement is adjacent to the western property line and abutts the toe of the slag pile. Commissioner Chitlea questioned if there can be anything planted on the slag pile. Planning Commission Minutes -13- January 13, 1988 210 e 1 ■ u I CITY OF &tNCHO CUCAMONGA r�SA ro STAFF REPORT � < > a A Z v 1 DATE: January 13, 1988 1917 lot and sidewalk TO: Chairear. and Members of *he Planning Commission retail areas of finesses located FAN. Brad Buller, City Planner lith current on- of a Temporary BY: Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor 04.070 and the SUBJECT: ENUI. WENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT is of three (3) U-0) - - btnae nV-Eo $WM0n a OUXB ode pertaining to parking �Jrd i lot sidewalk sale. any other Lor or parcel, or permitted within I. ANALYSIS: Staff his previously requested direction from the ann ny Cemaission to clarify the intent of parking lot sale rogulatlons. Specifically, the use of individual business he permitted for locations (storefronts) as the basis of permit approval and when ar; however, one for any business meeting time limits or other criteria. The Planning Commission determined +:hat the existing code was rovlded that at vague and could allow activity which did not meet the intent of regulation, nesses occupying n such sale; In order to clarify appropriate limitations for this type of sales Itain activity, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a the written Development Code Amendment. Specific recomendations Included: ;and must provide tusinasses on the The linl.ing of approvals to business locations; to sam shopping alk sale will be 2. Encouraging the involvement of multiple businesses within )tied and that no shoppin; centers to participate In sales events by If such sale will requiring ono permitted sale per year to involve at least 50% of the businesses within a shopping center, to same type that 3. Reducing the minimum time period between sales from 90 at the business days to 30 days, and 4. Limiting the total time for an approved soles event to hazard to three consecutive days. building The following language is suggested to clarify the intent of 1 be provided at regulation for parking lot ind sidewalk sales; including the Planning Omission cccaerendations. and maintained y for both the' r businesses on he saes shopping ;, �I� ITEM 0 I a 13, PEPOFT d PCA 88 -0: �..�e.. il. EUYtNCNMENTAL ASSEkWkT: Staff bat completed Part•I1 of the T:nv ronmen _ s and concluded that tte proposed intendment tiould not create significant adverse envirorrental ' ia'nacts. Therefore, staff recomendo issuance of A Negative Declaration. III. CORRESPONDENCE: This item ras advertised as a public hearing in 'e a r sport newspaper. To date no correspondert:a has been rice v— T erT, — Iv. RECONM£YOATION: It is reconeunded U.st U* Planning Cooaission aeop a ached Resolution recow tding to the City Council approval of the proposid anendmant A issuance of a Nagative Declaration. Res fully bmitted, Bra r ,w-- City. inner 88:RA :ns Attachments: Exhibit 'A' . Development Code, Section 17.10.03062 Resolution of Approval f' .An to fli• EJW131T "A" Excerpt from the Rancho Cucamonga Oavelopment Code SzetfOR IM MG 2. Parking Lot and Sidewalk Sales. Parking lot a..-A sidewalk sales or a fl.4a market type of operation may ba permitted 4W in the conuercial districts subject to the ayypyroval of a temporary use pernit ---s described in Chapter 1 M.0% and the fol_owipg— . criteria: a. The sale spy not exceed three days during any three - month peHM; b. The prospective merchant must obtain written author"zation of property owner; C. Ths aatfvfty shall not present a hazard to pedestrians or encroach on a required 'building exit; d. Safe vehicle ingress and egress shall be provided at all times; and e. Adequate parking shall be provided and maintained during the course of the activity. i I CIrT OF RANCHO CDCMONGA PART II - INITIAL STCDY ENVIROMUMAL CHECKLIST DATE : — hl+c e n B ,2 Z" /9B7 APPLICA \r: C14'Y bG' llcwCho CkjGyl, r?C"(5- 4 FILING DATE: lL-z- -saw too n43zR:_ _ 5S —v / PROJECT: CLGRM& %jr e*^t1La[ iJM,f:.ly- PROJsCr LOCATION:_. I. MMRO STAL IMPACTS (¢:planation of all "yet" and "maybe" arawers are required on attached - sheeta). TES MAYBE NO I. Sails and Cealon. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground Conditicas cr in cha:q:as in geologic cslatlonships? b. Disruptions, displaclttsnta, Compaction or burial of the gall? C. Change in topogrnphy or ground surface contour intervals? �— -- 4C d. The destruction, covering or modification Of any unique geologic or physical features? g. Any potential increast in Had or water erasion of soils, affecting either an or off @its conditons? -- f Changes in •roafon siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes. landslides, mud- slides, ground Failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the race of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. HydrolOQY. Will the proposal have significant results in: 0 Page 2 A YES tan \o x. a• Changes 1n currents, or the course of direction of (loving stroams, rivers, or ephemeral stseaa ahanneln? b. Changes In absorption rates, drainage Patterns, or the rate and Menem of surf..! runoff( water ✓ c• Alterations to the course or flow of flood voters? �- I, d• in the amount bChdan ody ote of surface water in any f water? e Discharge A. Dischae • into surface water! or �h . any alteracior of surface ester quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? ' C. Cheap is the quantity of oundwa cars, Olthsr Y •� through direct additions or drawais, 01' through interference with aquifer? as Quality? Quantity? — h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for —_ rublim water suppling? S• Erpaaure of people or property to water '*laced hazards such as flooding or with..? 3* 41r Duality. Will the results ins Proposal have sljglfSeapt _ Y A. Constant or periodic air emisoionu from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attsinoent of applicable air quality standards? c• Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temPeracure? 4. Biota / •—�— -k il_ o�•• Yill the proposal have significant results A• Change in the characteristics of species, diversity, distribution, ofcanding or number y species of plants? b• �� • Reduction of the Owmb.r...r ._.. ^. _�• -a 'age 3 YES C- IOCrOdwcCI on of ntw or disruptive species of Plants Into an &teat d. Redaction is the potential for agricultural production? ✓ Puna. M__ Will the proposal have significant results a. Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? J b. Reduction of the numbers of any uniqus, rare or endangered —_ species of animals? c. Introducelon of new or disruptive species 01 animals Into an area, or result in a barrier to the migr&tion or eovasent of animals? d. Deterioration or rmval of existing fish or wildlife habitat? _— S. Panulation. WiI1 the proposal have significant results ins a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rata of the human population of an area? _- b. W111 the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. soclo- Lcononic Factors. VS11 the proposal have significant results Sot a. Chants an local or regional soelo- economic characteristics, Including ecoom nle or comnercial diversity, tax rate, values? and property b. 11111 project costs be equitably distributed aa:ong project ban oflciarles, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project user&? -- Y ?. Land US@ and Planning Cons ldatatlonr. Will the proposal have significant result& Ih? a. A substantial alteration of the present or Planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plant of any governmental entities? 1 c. An Snpact upon the qulalty or quantity of exiattng eons =tiva or no -con a/i r1cr ton. Page r. YES PAY—BE NO ,.& S. Transportation, Will the proposal have significant naulu am a. Generation of substantial additional v,hl,.L,r ' Movement? ✓ — b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for __— nw strut construction? -- r. Effects on existing parking facilities. or demand for new parklnjt — -- "r d. Substantial impact upon existing eranaports- if tlon systeY? _ --1/ ,�y a. Alterations to presant pattarns of tircula- titan or movement of people and /or goods? ,1 -- f. Alterations to or effects an present and 9 7 Potemtlal water- borne, rail, mus transit or - air traffic? — -- g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? / 9. Cultura— ur��es. Will the proposal have -- ,C significant results ins a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, Paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Health. Safety. and Nuisance lectors, pill the proposal have significant results in a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential htal-:h hazards? e. A tier of explosion or release of hazardous L substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals -L or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? g. the creation of objectionable odors? ` h. An Increase in light or glare? b —�� his L s� Page S 1 YES HAYBE YO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results ins A. The obstruction or degradation of any .Can,. v1 8Ca or view} b. The creation of sa aesthetically offensive site? _ __ ✓ c. A Conflict with the objective of designated or or potential scenic corridors? 12. and Public Services, Will the proposal have a •lgnl ?cane need tot new systeas, or alterations to the followings - a. ElectrlC power? b. Natural or packaged gas? C. Ccmunications aystaasi _ -- d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? i. Salid Waste facilities? — h. Fire protection? — I. Police protection? �. ✓ J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ -- _ -- I. Nalaranance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? —_ a. Other goveraaantal services? 13. Ene. rsv and Scarc —rte , Will the proposal have significant reaulca ins a. Use of substantial or vccessivs fuel or energy? b. Substantial Increase In demand upon existing sources _ of energy} C. An increase In the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An Increase of perpetuation of the consumption Of non- renwable forms of when renewable sources of enez ar i'yi Jt avallablei !!7 le? 217' � 1 Page 6 t3� Y4 YES YAYDE a. Substantial depletion of ony nonrenewable or Yo H scarce natural resource? � la. Nandatory 7lndinRS o! SSRn1�c�• __• ,, a a• Does the project have tae potential to dezrade the the of the environn=t, subatintislly toduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, awe A fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or 'alas, eomauolty, roduea the number or restrict y> the t :age of a rate or endanfered plant of animal or eliminate - Important weples of the eajor periods of Califotnla history or prehistory? —_ b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -taro, to the disadvantage a of long -axes, eavixonsantal goals? (A shot -ten "pact on the brief. definitive Period of tin. hil long- 1y r M' tars !mp'ccs will aodure well into the future). c. ,bee the project have impacts which are Individually limited, bur cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable mean that the incremental effects of an Individual project era considerable When viewed Sts connection with the effects of past projects. and peobable future projgats). Y d. Dole the prajaee have anvironmantal affects which will Cu eubscautisl adverse offsets :7 on human being q althar directly or Indirectly? ^ II. DISC755IDN Cy ENVIEDNKMAL EVALDATIDN - -• the above questions Plus a distussicn of(proposad mitigation measures). x page 7 III. DETEMINATIW On the basis of this initial eVAlUationt }tom I find the proposed pmj*ct CO= NOT have A significant effect V�J on the mvlroaaent, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will he prepare!. 1 find that although the proposed project cwld have a sigciticant D Offset on the anvircimsnt, char* will not be a significant affect In this cue because cha eltlgstion mast be a doicrlbsd ignifi on an attached shoot have been addad to the proitect. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION DILL RE PREPARED. EDI find the propo■ea proje:t MAY have a significant effect on the envirmaat. end an ENVIROaT1L`i2 ngAC2 REPORT is requiree. Signature 21t1a D!1•l�til�at�s!•� i� RESOLUTION NO. 88 -10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CCMNISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 88 -01. AMENDING SECTION 17.10.030G.2 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, PERTAINING TO PARKING LOT AND SIDEWALK STILES WHEREAS, on the 13th dey of January, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public Miring pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; anJ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds it necessary to clarify and revise the Development Code regulations pertaining to Parking Lot and Sidewalk Sales. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission finds that the proposed eve apmant Code Amendment 88-01 is an implwntation of tha_ -- amrai. Plan goals and policies and that the General Plan Envi cm ntal Impact report adequately covers any potential significant adverse impacts, further, the Planning Commission finds that no subsegaht or supplemental anvirorwntal impact report is required pursuant to Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Fublic Resources Code. Specifically, the Planning Commission finds: A. No substantial ch2n z are proposed in any gals or policies which would rcqulre major revisions to the EIR. B. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken. C. No new' information on the project his become available. SECTION 2: Tho Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pr ec w not. treats a significant adverse impact on the enviro:ment and recommends issuanco of a Negative Declaration on January U. 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of Vie California Government Code, that the Planning Crmmlssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Development Cede Amendment 88 -01 amending Section 17.LO.030G.2. `oZd,� PLAl7.1N6 CONNISUON ' SOLUTION Oevalop )nt Code Ame...aent 88 -01 Jr.nuary 13, 1988 Page 2 e Section 17.10.0306 2. Parking Lot and Sidewalk SIIe7. Parking lot and sidewalk sales w" p rs Eli —on private property in the comereial /retail aroas of the City, including retail /wholasala hdsinesnas la:ated within indrutrial areas, in. connection vith curnsn: on -site busineswsI subject to the approval of a temporary Use Permit as provided in Sectiou 17:04.070 and tM fallowing criteria: a. Each sale is ltaited to a r+xiwn of three (3) conse.utive dil"; b. No sale for any single business or any other businesses located on the saw lot or parts], or within a shopping center, shall be permitted within thirty (30) days of another sale; C. A maximum of three (3) sales shall be permitted for each ousiness during each calendar year; however, one (1) additional sale sty be permitted for any business located within a shopping center provided that at least fifty percent (SO &) of the businesses occupying the center participate concurrently in such sale; d. The applicant for such sale must obtain the written authorization of the property owner ar.J muse provide proof of notification at least 30 day, prior to proposed sale to all other businesses on the same lot or parcel, )r within the sane shopping canter, that a parking lot or sidewalk Sala will be conducted, the times it will be conducted and that no other sale within thirty (30) days of such sale will b* permitted. e. The items to be sold shall he of the same type that are regularly displayed and sold at the business location; f. The activity shall not present a hazard to pedestrians or err -roach on a required building exit; g. Safe vehicle ingress and egress shall be provided at all times; and h. Adequate parking shall be provided and maintained during the course of thr activity for both the business of the applicant and all other businesses on the salse lot or parcel or within the ssme shopping center. a�3 lira COMMISSION ' *OLUTION 88 -10 2. Thit a Cerilfled Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby .i;.,Pted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the CtV Council. 3. The Planning Commlsf ion hereby recommends that the City ; Council approve and kdopt Development Code Amendment 8&01 as stated herein. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUAIIY, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY CF:RAHCHO CUCANGKGA I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was daly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of RA-Cho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of tho Planning Commission hsld crl the 13th lay of January, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: s AYES: XMIISSIONERS: EMERICK, TOLSTOY, SLAKESLEY. CHITIEA, ACNIEL NOES: CLIMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COWISSIONERS: NONE . 6 ORDINANCE N0. :� Z AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFIMNIA, A -NOING SECTION 17.1,5.03OG2 OF THE RANCHO CUCAN3NGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTMING TO PARKING LOT AND SIDMALK SALES. A. Recitals. (i) On January 13, 1988, to Plam,u,yy Coaamission of the City of Rancho Cucomonga conducted a duly noticx•] public hearing with respect to the proposed amendment to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (hereinafter ref:rred to as the 'Development .:ode') regarding regulations for the review and approval of parking lot and sidewalk sales. (ii) At the conclusion of said Jnn•ary 13, 1988 public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted its Rasolution fir). 88 -10 thereby recommenNng that this Council adopt the proposed Develo;wni Code amendments as set forth in this Ordinance. (iii) On February 3, 1988, the City Council of the City of Asncho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public fearing with respect to the proposed Development Code amendments as set iortn herein and said hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. (iv) All legal prerequlsitri prior to the adoption of this Crdinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IMCM) CUCAMINGA DOES HEREBI ORDAIII AS FOLLCHS: SECTION 1• That all of the facts as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this urdinaMc e are true and correct. SECTION 2• Section 17.10.030G2 of the Odvelopment Code of the laity of Rancho � uc a is hereby ,wended to read, in words and figures, :s follows: 2. Parking Lot and Sidewalk Sales. Parking lot and sidewalk sales may ep f of—ed n private property in the commmerci3l /retail areas of the City, ircluding retail /wholesale businesses located within industrial areas, in connection with current on -site businesses, subject to the approval of a Temporary Use Permit as provided in Section 17.04.070 and the following criteria: a. Each sale is limited to a maximum of three (3) consecutive days; gas Ordinance No. OCA 89 -01 Page 2 (7 b. No sale ror any single business or arty other businesses located on the same lot or parcel, or within a shopping center, .1hall be permitted within thirty (30) days of another sale; c. A maxima of three (3) sales shall be permitted for each business during each calendar year; however, one (1) additional s- le may be permitted for any business located within o shopping canter provided that at least fifty pdr.ont (50% of the businesses occupying the center participate concurrently in such sale; d. The applicant for such sale rust obtain the written authorization of the property ow, ;ar and must provide proof of notlficacion at least thirty (30t days prior to prop.,,ad sale to all ot.,er businesses on the saw lot or parcel, or within the sane shopping center, that a paging lot or sidewalk sale will be conducted, the times it sill be conducted and that ro other sale within thirty (30) days of such sale will be permitted. e. The items to ue seld shall be of the sane typt that are regularly displayed and sold at the business location; f. The activity shall not present a hazsrd to pedestrians or encroach on a required building exit; g. Safe vehicle ingress and egress shall be provides at all times; and h. Adequate parking shall be provided and maintainaa daring the course of the activity for both the business of the applicant and all other businesses on the same lot or parcel or within the same shopping center. SfCTIOX 3: The City Council declares that, should ant provision, section, paragr —a-p sentence or word of this Ordinance be rend,tred or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this hrdinanco shall remain in full force and effect. %CTION 4: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance an—Ts IT cause the sarae to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Ddily Report. a newspaper of general ci•culation published in the City o n ar o, a ornia and cir.ulated in the City of Ranchc Cucamonga, California. cX 4 ev �f 1. RECOMMENDATION: is meeting o. January 13, 1988, the Planning omm ss on recoo •nded that the City Council approve Industrial Specific � f f t Council support oxwendation,adooptlol of attached Ordinance woold be appropriate. lI. Bvenue0UN5 vouaDeSCUSSM., thehIndust ialeArealSpecificfPlan Cleveland still designates the street as a secondary arteriel. Accordingly, General Dynamics is requesting an Industrial Specific Plan Paendment to delete the street, thereby allowing the vacation process to be completed. The Specific Plan Amendment is associated with ornerhofd8thloS of an ClevelandnAven ee which was approved oy the Planning Commission at its January 13, 1988 meeting. The property east of Cleveland Avenue is owned by General Dynamics, and access and circulation improvements will be master planned and completed as development occurs. Additional street dedications may be required at the time of such development. Parcels west of Cleveland Avenue are afforded access from Toronto Avenue, a cul -de- sac street (see attached staff report, Exhibit 09). The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the request, and determined that the proposed amendment would be appropriate. o:A% CPT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA +a STAFF REPORT��° " J I 'r LL O 8 p n 2 O > DATE. February 3, 1988 1917 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Greg Gage, Assistant Planner ABJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSiiEMT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN RE EirW-e _ amen nt- cess rcu -a on an or a ndustrial Area Specific ' Plcn (Subarea 10) to eliminate Cleveland Avenue, north of 7th Street - APN: 209 - 272 -02 Related Files: Conditional Use Permit 87 -42; Vacation Request 069 A 1. RECOMMENDATION: is meeting o. January 13, 1988, the Planning omm ss on recoo •nded that the City Council approve Industrial Specific � f f t Council support oxwendation,adooptlol of attached Ordinance woold be appropriate. lI. Bvenue0UN5 vouaDeSCUSSM., thehIndust ialeArealSpecificfPlan Cleveland still designates the street as a secondary arteriel. Accordingly, General Dynamics is requesting an Industrial Specific Plan Paendment to delete the street, thereby allowing the vacation process to be completed. The Specific Plan Amendment is associated with ornerhofd8thloS of an ClevelandnAven ee which was approved oy the Planning Commission at its January 13, 1988 meeting. The property east of Cleveland Avenue is owned by General Dynamics, and access and circulation improvements will be master planned and completed as development occurs. Additional street dedications may be required at the time of such development. Parcels west of Cleveland Avenue are afforded access from Toronto Avenue, a cul -de- sac street (see attached staff report, Exhibit 09). The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the request, and determined that the proposed amendment would be appropriate. o:A% A CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: ISPA 87 -04 February 3, 1988 ` Page 2 III. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Comdssion, at Its au!e ng o anuary . held a public hearing to consider the requested Industrial Specific Plan Aoendoent. RMe Comission resolved to recomend approval of Industrial specific Plan Anendaent 87 -04 to the City Council. Res fully I d, Bra ler City P annex 88:66 :ko Attechmei.te: January 13, 1968, Planning Camiscion Staff Report Resolution No. 88-09 Ordinance of Approval 0 -` i - At��ys. .�r •o-r *' '�r:nf <c;n =k.=6 `w ;�f ?��^.3^�� r-`� • 1RAllrllr �IIISIIIIi •� i mall clerk for -the C1ty of Rancho CucaarNga do hareOY wcYr.tli+t : ?AV +`9ro:clouUlY:< �',I o'eloat,y.=��)�,��t�t� (a.Mi >p,M.l, t dejoMtN in the ' - Cucaman9a 6ren2A 'Qr)ud 3tat7i UT OT1fa'locaud -at 9107, safreca Center Drive, a lottr'W''ms"d to aM reilar@:99 Z LlAj6f!«�cwcC3 sti.s l %"':/' j, Sfgned: W&,29� Oat*: (101011 KTWAl AnIER SIRKME) Aft I - r i l , 0 i MPRRRN - P.,'dw7c7_1 f NOTICE OF PUBLIC HCAP.IUB ,RANCHO COCA' W. CITY COUNCIL The Rancho Cucamonga City Council will be holding public hearings at 7:30 p.m. on February 3,' 1929 at the Lionc Part Community Building located at 916 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga; California ,91730,-t* consider the fol•oiring described project(s): ruvtonmawal 14fCr2C WVr AM tmnlrtTRTtu SarcirTC PLAY IJ nmwmT a7-n& Specifte Min I of 7th Strait - APNt c Anyone having cw&er*n or gqrvastlons on any of as abo7a items are welcoam to cuntact the City Manetng Dt'Hstoe at (714) 989 -1861 or visit the offices ic"W at 9310 We Lira Wd, Unit 8. Also, anyone ob,ectiiq to or in favor of the above, my appear in parson at the above- describod greeting ar soy satetit their concerns ;n wfting to the Planning Division, City of Rancho CwAnw9a pr'or to said meeting. January 21, 1988 Rancho Cucamonga City Coun:tl Yale • a3o C1Tli OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 13, 1988 TO: Chairman and Memba••r of the Planni,.9 remission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Greg Gage, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: E4vIRO4M17AL ASSCSSIENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN 7AfHT -'t1b - - n mein n e cess a rcu ac on vion for ndustrial Area Specific Plan (Subares 10) to elicinate Cleveland Avenue, north of 7th Street - APR: 209- 272 -02 Related Files: Conditional Use Permit 87 -42; Yacatlotc.- Request 069 1. BACKGROUND: In filing the above referenced Conditional Use Permit application. the applicant requested approval to vacate the remaining 30 foot right -of -way for Cleveland Avenue, north of 7th Street (see Exhibi4 B`). In reviewing the request, it va3 noted that the western half of Cleveland Avenue had been previously vacated in 1981. Since the Industrial Specific Plan designates Cleveland Avenue as a secondary arterial, it 1s necessary to amend the Circulation Plan for the Industrial Area Specific Plan by deleting Cleveland Avenue (north of 7th Street), thereby allowing the street vacation process to be completed. II. ANALYSIS: The proposed amendment would not restrict access or e oTi p rtie affect circulation fur parcels in the vicinity. Properties west of Cleveland Avenue are provided access from Toronto Avenue, a cut- de -sar street (see Exhibit `A'). Properties east of Cleveland Avenue r e %vned by cne applicant, and access end circulation improvements dill be master planned and completed as the parcels are develol :d. Additional dedications for future streets may be required at the time of such development. The City Traffic Engineer has rev •e A the regvest, and determined that the prcposed vacation would Do appropriate (see attached memorandum dated December 10, 1987). If approved, the amendment and related street vacation would allow the applicant to proceed with the development of a utility substation immediately east of the Cleveland right -of -pay. vial ITEM P 1 III. RECOIMEIDATICN: It 1s cons era public inpu after such considerat recommendation of appro would be appropriate. Resp ally fitted, ra City P anner EB :c6:ko .. recamarided that the Planning Commission t and issues related to the request. •If, fon, the ComciSsion can c suoport a val, adcotton of the attached Resolution F Attachments: Letters from Applicant ' Nawrandm from Ctti Traffic Engineer Exhibit 'A' - vicinity Nap Exhibit `B' - Street Vacation Plan Resolution Recommending Approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 87 -04 and Street Vacatiun ' Request 069 23;L �I�A ==06.10W, C~ eeee MW kms R w1 smr ne eat DWM Cselmme 12131412e ie191 auam ►A%: (819145 4.513 MEC 1391!12 KSA UI City of Ra1rri3 Cueasmga Planning 0Wd'lm rtt 9720 Basellre Road P.O. Box B7/ Ranch* Ct9eteeon91, CA 91730 IWJaett Vacation of Cleveland AWILM Oear 51 rlMA16net NZVWcar 17, 1967 In rntJunction with a request to the Engineering Department to ultlela »IV var.Ote Clewintl AvarA between Seventh Strost and the Atch Inaan, Topeka and Sane re Railroad Right -ot- waV, 0aneral Dynaalas Corporation requests an aMKkIUnt to the circulation slamnt of thti Industrial Specific Plan. Attached Is the appropriate too of 51.251.00. Please Ca LI Me If VDU havaianll qunticrts. L. SL6veti - 1I.C.E. 025293 it /Princioaf Civil Engineer M.Stesk D 33 e 30�w Mm Ogren 0+ taw wasnn lm. 3~ arm no a� oaao. c4b,ram1.92171 -2928 Ia1h 4334M PAX nln 4=4315 MM K7Net wA Ul Novaopar 17. 1997 ?.; City Of Rancho Cucar,otga v, Engineering OooartRant 6.. ��. 9320 Baseline Road P.O. Box 907 Rancho Cxmionge. CA 91730 Slbject, Vacation of Cleveland AvwiLm a Dear Sir /M dmt General Dynaalcs Coroxation r*MWG s "IS Vacation of Cia✓dland Aver&* CM"Wn the r4r"Wr I rIgntbf -way of Seventh Street and the Atchlnsan, Topeka and San" Fe Re Iroad Rignt -Ot -Wily. The orcowty east of Clevslw4 AVsmA 19 "Is MIV property not pfNO by ? General OynM11:3 That Is afteCted by the Vacafi0n. this property Is accen ibla by way of Toronto AVerkM. With Eighth Street <.acateo, "A above referenced portion cf Cleveland Avenue Serves no puroo" old Is root dMireole for the Ultiegte develdMO t of "to !` adjacent ornoerty. Attached Is the aporcVriate fee of 6125.00. ` Please call me it Vou hays any cueaticm. ern. R.C.E. 825M loaf Civil Engineer M.S,Cak A6`4 0 wwn , i I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM r Date: December 10, 1987 Tc: Barry*. Xamn, Senior Civil Engineer From: Pcul 2oa4e4u, Traffic Eneinurow, " Subject: Vacation of Cleveland Awme The vacation proposed, the portion of Claveland between Seventh Street and the At;Msoa, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, has been reviewed by.this section and found to be ap;ropriata. tt should be noted that, if the owner of the property to the east ehoom to sub - divide the property, a dedication of a street in this ioeetion,=y_. again be necessary. PAR:pam - S' 3. 1 • li've"kiffilis I I I k W.1 elel 10em W, LIA ♦ aZ(v n'EM- I - S P A - ea--Oq TrMEtVirimiTY M ExHiBrr, SA: SCALE, NTs ✓�V, NO H RECE7VEE1 11» r 4� A i �s rnre•.wew.,�e wG+syva= crev�a�.�ace eloroiv �nre�.rcar.swaat'nraer- ®3� a.� iirina� CITY OF rmNt. I.S-P B— 87-04 RAISO-D CLrAMONGA Tnu, -R�ET V� ATION P Ati n ANNINC DMSICN EXHtrfr, _ SCALEt NTH et3'% 0 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -oB A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (I.S.P.) AHEMONENT 87 -04 TO ELIMINATE CLEVELAND AVENUE NORTH OF 7TH STREET A. Recitals. (i) General Dynamics has filed an application for an Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 87 -04. as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Specific Plan Amendment request is referred to as 'the application'. (it) On January 13, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public h ^wring an the application and concluded said hearing an that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this 60ution have occurred. O. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, dettrained and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Sity of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Tnis Commissien hereby apecifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January 13, 1988, including written and oral staff reports together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as f0lows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of 812) Street (vacated) and Cleveiand Avenue, and is presently vacant; and (b) The prop -rty to the north of the subject site is developed with tndus+:rial uses, and 1s provided access from Vincent Avenue; and (c) The property to the south and east of the site is currently vacant, is owned by the applicant, and will have access and circulation patterns master planned and completed as development occurs; and (d) The property to the west 1s partially developed with a manufacturing use, whicn is provided access from Toronto Avenue, a cul -de -sic street. Ras .F, PLANNING COMISSIC FSOLUfION NO. 88 -09 RE: ISPA 87 -04 - GENERAL DYNAMICS January 13, 1988 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted within the district in terns of access, size, and compatibility with exist ;t - land uses in the surrounding area; and (b) That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not have significant impact on the envirommant nor the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed Specific Plan ;wendnent Is in conformance with the General Tian. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the pioje:t his been reviesmd and considered in camplisnce with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recwuaids issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above„ this C.mmission hereby resolves as follows: (a) l tt pursuant to Section 6SeSO to 6SMS of the California Goverrwent Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 13th day of January, 1988, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 87 -04. (b) The Planning Commission hereby recaaards that the City Council approve and adopt Industrial Area Specific Plan A:eemdment No. 87 -04 (c) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning 'aas:aston shalt be fo:wardtd to the City Council. 6. fie Deputy Secretary to this Commission shalt certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED Ai.T) ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1988. PLANNING COMiISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYANGA b Y tom:_ � �6`-- 'iq,.1'rt` Ir -- - _ •- _ _ __ _ PLAXNING COMIISSI �.ESDWTION NO. 88 -og RE: ISPA 87 -03 - ,uENOM DYNAMICS Jcnuary 13, 1958 Page 3 St I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the 'tanning Coaaaissio,� of the City of Rancho Curaeongd, do hereby certify that the . Mgoing Ret�ldtion was duly and regularly Introduced, passed, a.-.!-adopted by the Planning Cownission of the rity of Rancho Cucaannga, at a regular meting of the Planning Comission held on the 1:01 day „f January, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIMERS: TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EKSRICK, HCHIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ROME - OU14ANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY C RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (I.S.P.) AMENDMENT 81 -04 REQUESTING THAT CLEVELAND AVENUE (NORTH OF 718 STREET) BE DELETED FROM TILE. INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califrrn ±a dews ordain as follows: findings: SECTION 1: The Rancho C %tcaannga City Council hes .lade the following 1. That the Planning Cr- Mssion cf the City of Rancho Cucamonga reconmendba that the City Council approve Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 87 -04 based uprn substantial evidence presented to said Ccmaission during a public hearing conducted on January 13, 1988, including written and oral staff reports; and 2. The application applies to property located at the southerst corner of 8th Street (vacated) and Cleveland Avenue, and is presently vacant; and 3. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with industrial uses, and is provided access fro. Vincent Avenue; and 4. The property to the south and east of the site is currently vacant, is owned by the applicant, and will have access and circulation patterns ouster planned and completed as development occurs; and 5 ;`,e property to the west 1s partially developed with a manufacturing use, which is provided access from Toronto Avenue, a cul -de -sac street. 6. That the proposed �peciflc Plan Amendment wouTd not have signifirant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties; and 7. That the proposed Specific Plan &endment 1s in conformance with the G_neral Plan. SECTION 2: Tne Rancho CucaWOaga Planning Coamission has found that this pro ec w l —not create a significant advcrse impact on the environment and recomoended issuance of a Negative Declaration on January 13, 198e. h CITY COONCIL OFMINARCE NO, RE: ISP). 87 -04 February 3, 1988 Page 2 N7N, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the City Cou:rcil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has held a public hearing in the time and canner prescribed by law and duly heard and has detenalned thrt the street designation for Cleveland Avenue, north of 7th Street as indicated on Exhibit "A" may be deleted from the Industrial Area Specific Plan. SECTION 3: Tn: Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause'irl saaae to be published within fifteen (15) days afttr its - passage ac 'east once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. -i 1 r' H6PVA/D'MLCf:1AOwIVr 1 � 11�t7RN1L- . AkLW.RIE AWA W'5=: / I.O S,ATMKa\=tt• s/E H0Q\\ l Akin V } T C LfATL70_ pftpam 49 sUM%TKmv VAtAArf .. V/NSYARD I 6GoB01t /NO. . qr SJo IOFM-r= SLOG V /NEY�IRD t 1 1 OwA ra�ce� � ` 1 4 GW. /ND. 1 ` 1 ncY•asr.. LrF ' � u G6V. AVO• V,"AYARR CEY• oar t3pw 1 /� OFF,CE a" V V I-- ZO.YG BOL"OARY w'E NORn i CIr7YOF /�7y ��}�y� �, 1.5_PA. 87 -04 RANCHO l IJLL,NKX`GA Tn-LE. STAEET \IAUTION 9l-AtA PLANNIM; DIVAN EXHIBITS SCALE, PITS r 1r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 mol—K TO: City Council and City Manager FROP- Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Juay Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONItCTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 35 FOR TRACT NOS. 13440. 13441, 13442, 13445, PARCEL HAP 1Ob71, DR 87 -21. DR 87 -15 AND OR 87 -09 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 35 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval connection with Annexation No. 35 t o No. 1 for Tract Nos. 13440, 134 OR d7 -21, DR 87 -15 and OR 87 -0 9 . de�alopments have been notified o f attached resolution also approves approved by Resolution No. BB -014. Respectfully submjttFd RHM:JA:dlw • Attachments is a resolution ordering the work in Street Lighting Maintenance District 41, 13442, 13445. Parcel Map 10671, The developers of the subject the public hearing by mail. The the Engineer's Report tentatively atay I ` _ e 'tiK9.jY�.J'�+ik-5: *�°L`r:N..i...a^.w...• .. z_ r� «...i Air' -'.- —r..•Hry'w+. - "r6 ARIZZI V M ZA&iM W" *Ink for the city 99 "atta Caamays. ao baaay WNW tut as �� : S' l"Y' at apraaisntaly 000 a'alaet, �r+Cia_.(a.n. or 0.s.). ! a.i. -.tt" is tia' ONC&OW grata at t1a 0aitM lt~ Foat'Ottiaa leant" at 9607 ieeira06 csatar beieo, a leet4w aitraeaN to ant rNUdLw City Council Mating, February 7. 1908. at 7s30 p.m. •:""""� "' Oes attachLe liar for addresses signets _.61:L184 Antes 119AI Ir'il, (raters to city Cluwa Clue* altar aigaiag) Y :ha a a I Stevan Ford The M111fu Lyon co"&Ry 85{6 Archibald Avenue, Suite 8 Rancho cucaeonge, CA -91730 . RE: Annexation .to, 35 to Street Maintenance District go. 1 and Annexation No. 7 to street 1.f ting Maintenance District No. 3 for Tract Mos. 13{{0, 13441, 13942 and 13445 BCE Davelopeent, Incorporated 2201 Dupont Drtvm, Su12e 200 Irvine, CA 92715 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landsapa Maintenaaa District No. 3, Annexation No. 35 to Street Mtintenance District No. 1 and Ann&Aatlon No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for parcel Map 10617 4' Jaffrey Schlosser Schlosser Forge Coepany 11711 Arrow Rtute Rancho Cucasonga, CA 91730 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Annexation No. 35 to Street Maintenanca District: No. I and Annexotion No. 8 to Street Lighting Mafntanancc District No. 6 for DR x7.09 Bruce Barsakfan The Barsaklan Company 850 Vineyard Avenue, Suite 510 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Mafntananca District No. 3, Innexation No. 35 to Street Maintenance District No. 1 and Annexetion No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for DR 87 -21 and DR 87.15 i Thomas Kinoborg Russell. Stanley last, incorporated 9449 Santa Anita Avmus Rancho Cucaecnga, CA 91730 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Malnten4ncs MDR 86-2{ District No. 3 for Tract aylQ CV 6 RESOLUTION NO. $ $ -off A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONVECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 35 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE :INAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13440, 13431, 13442 13445, PARCEL MAP 10671, OR 87 -21, OR 07 -15 AND DR 87 -69 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ND. 1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of January, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. e8 -015 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 35 to ,trees Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -015 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown h• the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and _ WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed •Notice of Improvement•, was duly and legally posted in the time, form manner, location, and number as required by law, is appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 89 -015, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed In the time, torn and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on Me in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly •ecelved considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work anJ the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisaiction to order the proposed work. SECT40N 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -DI5, be dune and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a-3— SECTION 3: The assessaents and method of assesemea* 4n the Engineer's � po-rT-are hereby approved. 15EC ION 4: The assessm2nts shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts nave been occupied. a47 '-7u-- F; i� d a ?� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA is Engineer's Report for Street Lighting xation No. 35 35 District No. 1 Tract No%. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13445, i Parcel Map 10617, DR 87 -21, DR 87 -15 and DR 87 -09 1 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in conpliarce with the requirements of Article 4, e Chapter 1, Division 15 of the .°,treets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). 3 ?; SECTION 2. General Description ?' This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has _ determined that the street lights to be maintaineA will have an effect ..._ upon Lal lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and naterials for the ordir -ry and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street P lht improvements on mayor streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Nap which is on file with the City Engineer. improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in tht District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTIOA 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Enainaarine Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map Or development plan and the assessment diagram for the enact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street 110hting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specif4cs were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated boles. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated +nta two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street tight improvements on mayor streets for residential improvements (single family, multi - family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City., Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessmert units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Mtintenance District No. 1 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Total Annual Lamps Lm.s Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YM No. 35 Total 58ODL 444 0 444 35DOm. 477 8 485 16,DOOL 16 0 16 22,000L 3 1 4 ?7LDDL 6 0 6 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 15,19C Assessment Units this annex per page 4 677 _ Total Assessment Units 15,867 Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lm.s Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 58ML 444 X S 8.93 X 12 S 47,579.04 9500L 485 X $10.16 X 12 59,131.20 16,000L 16 X S12.08 X 12 2,31? 36 22,000L 4 X $13,84 X 12 664.32 27,500 o X $15.31 X 12 2.939.52 Total Annual Maint. Cost $112,633.44 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 15,19C Assessment Units this annex per page 4 677 _ Total Assessment Units 15,867 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost • S112 633.44 , .7.10 /year /unit .o n .n s r — 4titt'o7— Assessment shall apply to each lot cr parvil as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment DiagrS Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1*, Annexation No. 25. These diagrams are hereby incorporated witnin the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall oe equal for each unit. "On units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units.pe y„_, net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Eng<neer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City iccssthrana .Deny and e rmines t fornaDirictorabndon the proceedings 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a repurt with the City Council. 5. Every year to June, the City Council conducts a public haar.ng and approves, cr modifies and approves the individual assessments. 5 n. -,Av EXMID• 1" ' No- Properties end isproveoents to be included within Annexation 3S to Street lighting Maintenance District 1: - _ s to be Annexed Assess: _ .y; 7`= ; Pro act Acreage _t Zone 1 $ ".; U, SR 13440 TR 13441 Lis -- --- -» - -. TR 13442 152 — --- - -' TR 13445 __- 215 --- ___ --- --- , y Zone 2 _ „- '# PM 10617 16.97 34 DR 87.21 - -- 6.25 12 --- 2 OR 87 -15 1.64 3 --- "' - -- 1 OR 87 -09 17.40 3s 1 ». 677 --- 8 --- r � ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 35' s %!D v crrY of aAxcHa cvc ♦�caxaA .. • COUM OF SM MNKIWrK0 �: `` t3 L srAT$ OF CALIFORNIA m . rJ r0� 'Q �, h rT n �_: p� n ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.Z ANNIJIATION NO. 35* CITY OF -NCFJO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF BAN 31111NARDINO SPATE OF CALWORNIA --- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.Z -t ANNEXATION NO. 35 Amw El 's. t I { Sd=mvv CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DR 267-21 a..L'_• COUNTY OF BAN MNARDWO — r STATZ OF CAWORMA A 7 o. i�J ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO-1 ANNEXATION NO. -15' _ TH STREET i4 \ ii 0 Sir,- 11 re 1i • i 1, I CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ COUNTS OF am B.ERNmmmo STATE 07 CALMRM j�,� �m 1 '� fin, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO..Z ANNEXATION NO. 95' CYTY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNABDIiO N E ■ RECONEIMTION: ,,, It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Naintcnance District No. 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation Na. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 for Tract hos. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13444 and 13445 (Victoria;. The developer of the subject tracts has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves tha Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -016. Respectfully submitted �pfy,l.'1r Lw)n RHH:JA:sm Attachments ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manaaer FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 13440, 13441. 13442, 13444 AND 13445 (VICTORIAI TO STREET LIGM'ING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 RECONEIMTION: ,,, It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Naintcnance District No. 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation Na. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 for Tract hos. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13444 and 13445 (Victoria;. The developer of the subject tracts has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves tha Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -016. Respectfully submitted �pfy,l.'1r Lw)n RHH:JA:sm Attachments ■ YI-WM M 11 ��r�(��Olw,lf.�1 mail acct for tM City of Baaata atamtep. do Mrahr mow %box a.' �a.1v. b5"' Uer at amoximtuly ' *-at** Qm. ca.m, er 7.26i, 1 40"41tet ir, tto ac.n.ap Brach of tta Dritoa Stataa Mt'0ltiam laaat*d at 9447 Buiaaea Canter Drive, a latter aNroatN to W reamd"B City Cbhrhtil P"tin9, Februlry 3, 1954`• at 7130 P.M. ."•�....•.. Sao attached list for addrearn (raurn to City C1arYa GfPlca attar aipiW 'Y I Stevan Ford Tha Nillizo Lyon Company 8_40 Arrhlbald Avenw, Suite 8 Rancho Cucmomonge, CA 91730 . RE: Annexation No. 3S to Street Malntenanca District No 1 and Annexation no$ 7 to Street L10hting Maintenance District No. 3 for Tract hom. 13440, 134!1, 13612 and 13445 BCE Development, Incorporated 7201 Dupont Drive Suite 200 Irving, CA 92711 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Annexation No. 35 to Street Maintmrance District No. 1 and Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for Parcel Map 10617 Jeffrey Schlosser w Schlcsser Forge Company A 11711 Arrow Route y Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 S' RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Annexation No. 35 to Street Maintenance District No. 1 and Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for OR 87 -09 Bruce Barmaklan The Barmakian Coxpai0r 6540 VinAyard Avenue, Suite 510 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Annexation No. 35 to Street Maintenance District No. 1 and Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for OR 87 -21 and DR 87 -15 r Thomas K1ndbarg Russell - Stanley Nest, Incorporated 9449 Santa Anita Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape rfaintenancg District No. 3 for Tract NOR 86-24 db;L- V) RESOLUTION N0. T9-06* A RESOLUTION OF THE LITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THB WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNE%1.TION NO. 7 TO STREET LIGNTIKq MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGtLKER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13444 AND 13445 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th dey of January, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -017 to order the therein described work in .nns "%ion with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. w rich Resolution of Intention No. 83 -017 was duly a.ed legally published in tine, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on ,lie in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of-.said- _ Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Impeovement', was duly and legally posted in the tine, form, manner, location, and nuaber as required by law, as a pears from the Affidavit of Posting said natives, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duty mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -017, according to the names and addresses o? such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly awiled in the time, fons, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City C 'juncil having duly received conside -ed evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction fasts in this proceeding end concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefi,•s to be derived tbarefrom and sold City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamongpp i1at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council herehy orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -017, be done and made; and SECT'OH 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and— SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's po• are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said trac s ave been occvpied. CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District no. 3 (victoria) Annexation No. 1 for Tract Nos. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13444 and 13445 SECTION 1. Authority for Raporc This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Mi ?hw ys Coda, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 912). SECTION 2. Generil Description This City Council hat elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has - -- determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for wttt the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinarf and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector street:) as shown on the Lighting District Alias Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas to the District and :ost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. °ECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the dovelopment and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the sty c lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or ark part of any improvement, providing for the il'iumination of the suoject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. Ail improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available date, it i- estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost date. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on mayor streets for residential improvements (single family, multi - family, condominiums and apartments) throughout re City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assassmznt units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lanes Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* ITO No. 7 Total SBOOL 870 188 1,058 9500L 62 - -- 16,0001. - -- 22,000L 21.500E •high Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual L" Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost S8o0L 1,OS8 X f 8.93 X 12 $113,375.28 9500E 82 X $10.16 X 12 9,997.44 16,000L - -- X $12.08 X 12 0 22,DOOL - -- X $13.64 X 12 0 27,500 - -- X $15.31 X 12 0 Total Annual Maint. Cost $123,372.72 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 2,414 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 769 Total Assessment Units 3,183 r 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost 823 372.72 , $38.75/ycar /unit ;r o. o n s in District i.183— Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. •R SECTION 5, Assessment Ota Zam kY Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagram are attached to this report and labeled OStreat Lighting Maintenance District No. 34, 4 Annexr ton No. 7. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text g of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment leproveaents for the District are fowl to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment stall be equal for each � unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units-per- net acre. a, SECTION 7. order of Events A r 1. City Councll adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to torn a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every yea- in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. ea o� CXNJBIT `A' Propaitfes and fmprovasa•nts to be included wfthfn Annexation No. 7 to Street Lightfng Nainunanca Ofs',:'ict 3: Pro ect Assess. No- of Laos to Aere� U�tt be Annexed Zone 1 TR 13440 - -- 111 31 TR 13441 --- 115 28 - -- TR 13442 --- ;52 48 ... _._ _- TR 13444 - -- 176 23 - -- _-- _._ TR 13445 - -. 215 58 --- --_ ... .._ TOTAL 769 188 Zone 2 1 9 trr ro t 3 _Z n i - n, n4.7 ' . . -. - ! -- - - , n l r n n 17- 1 0 .1 e,_ 0 n 0 2 (" r I ■ — CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Marager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Eng'nr-r BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 8 FOR PARCLI. MAP 10617, DR 87 -21 , OR 87 -15 AND OR 87 -09 (VARIOUS 10CATIMS THROUGHOUT THE CITY) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTEMAr,CE•DISTRICT NO. 6 It is recoemended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 8 to Street Lightin3 Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. YSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for Parcel Map 10617, DR 87 -21, DR 87 -15 and OR 87 -09. The developers of the subject developments have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -018. Re ectfully submt t ., RKM:JA:diw • Attachments :l3 s .N ,,, -V dd'nG9s a MUMS mall exert few, W City at Umbe acwwrps ds bWlbp woor tMt om J4+v. as' ae ii , sprrsiralr r:.3D efloos �,l��.fa.a. sr *.n.), t dgsoited is the atrwp Saasct of t" Wiwi States 1Uet'affiee located at 1607 tesiseee L Cuter Drive. U letter eddreeeed to eel regarding e City Camcil 1LetLAq, rebtvarr 3. 1988. at 7t3a p.m. Sea attached lint for uddxersee r Upedt Ppxdg ✓ Dotes h� y Z S' � (tetea to city clews office after s3pisg) x :0 t� } Stevan Ford The William Lyon Company 8540 Archibald Avenue, Suite 6 Rancho Cucaenn9a, CA 91730 . 'I, RE: Annexation No. 3b to Street Maintanante District moo. 1 and Annexation No. 7 to Street Li ting Maintenance District A:. 3 for Tract Nos. 13440, 13441, 13432 and 13445 BCE ClIvelaplent. Incorporated 2201 Dupont Drive Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92711 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Annexation No. 35 to Street Maintarmce District No. 1 and Axnexation No. 8 to, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for Parcel Map 10517 k Jfrffrey Schlosser s Schlosser Forge Capany 11711 Arrow Route Rancho Cucaaxvnga, CA 91730 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Mslntanance District No. 3, Annexation No. 35 to Street Maintenance District No. 1 and Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting MaintenLUe District No. 6 for OR 87 -09 Y Bruce Daraakian The Barmakian Company 8540 Vineyard Avenue, Suite 510 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Annexation No. 35 to Street Maintenance District no. 1 and Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for DR 87 -21 and DR 87 -15 Thomas Kirdberg Russell-Stanley West, Incorporated 9449 Santa Anita Avenue Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Trait MDR 86-24 ll A RESOLUTION NO. g8 ^0e4t- A RESGLVTICN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10617, DR 87 -21 , DR 87 -15 AND DR 07 -09 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of January, BOB, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -019 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -019 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by taw, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed •Notice of Improvement•, was duty and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by 'law; as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described to said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -019, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, farm, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therc,rom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the p•oposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council o` the City of Rancho Cucamonga ilmat the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of ntion No. 88 -019, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a— SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's REport re hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 6C percent of said trac s ave been occupied. a-)ca CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 8 for Parcel Map 10617, DR 87 -21, OR 87 -15 and OR 87 -09 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is to compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Higyhwayys Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1g ?2). SECTION 2. Genoral Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The :ity Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shorn on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed an a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference 1s hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the a•,sessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for s.reet lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the saac extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. r SECTION 4, Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements rill be constructed by developers. Used on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment b purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 has been demarcated into two zones. Zxu 1 is comprised of street light ' mprovements on major av streets for residential improvements (single family, multi= aally, +` condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, coamrcfat and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is '1 shorn below: 1, S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 8 Total 58DOL 42 - -- 42 9500L 2 - -- 2 16,000L --- -- °- 22,000L --- °- --- 27,50OL 'High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lacy Size Lamps Rate Ma's Maint. Cost 5800L a2 X S 8.93 X 12 $4,500.72 9500L 2 X $10.16 X 12 234.84 16,0001. - -- n $12.08 X 12 0 22,000L - -- X $13.84 X 12 0 27,500 - -- X $15.31 X 12 0 To +al Annual Maint. Cost 54,744.56 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 262 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 84 Total Assessment Units 346 �J Y XY . YM 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: }Ra' Total Annual Halntenance Cost 54.56 f13.71 /year /unit y No. R to sir S X:. y,+ Assessment shall apply to each lot ar parcel as explained in Section 6. r SECTION S. Assessment Diaormo Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled *Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 60, jAnnexation No. 2 These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. - SECTION 6. Asseit:n.r _ Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each i unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Approval of City Engineers Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in "ay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approve: the individual assessments. t. EXHIBIT •A' '' I Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 8 to Streat Lighting Haintenarce District 6: " Assess. No. of Lams to be Annexed Pro ect Acreage nff T DC Zone 1 Zone 2 PH 10617 16.93 34 --- - -- --- --- --- OR 87 -21 6.25 12 - -- - -- --- DR 87 -15 1164 3 - -- --- --- OR 87 -09 17_40 35 42.22 84 - -- - -- - -- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 ANNEXATION NO. B CIT�Y��OgF nANCHOpCyUyCAMONGA r 11c, � ![ COVi\li OF SAN a+'++.i\AlWlNO M 33 STATE OF C�'OItNIA — T �> l�l im ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 ANNEXATION NO.0 P ITE- ,m" ? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF RAN mNARDwo e; ,3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA — N G iy im ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. h ANNEXATION NO. B t,,051 CITY OF RANCHO CUC"ONGA -15 •� , COUNTY OF 8AN BMABDINO I 1 BTATE OF CALIFORNIA �k ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. go ANNEXATION NO. e /517 CPIR OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' COUN'T'Y OF SAN BERNARDINO i� STATE OF CALIFORNIA m — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: February 3, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING (H.E WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 12 FOR PARCEL MAP 10617, OR 87 -21, DR 87 -15. DR 87 -09 AND MDR 86 -24 TO 6%.NOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 RECOVUMTION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resonticir ordering the work in connection wish Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and approvini the Engineer's Report. GACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attched for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Natntenance District No. 3 for Parcel Map 10617, DR 87 -21, OR 87 -15, DR 8749 and MDR 86 -24. The devil,r.,ers of the subject developments have been no•ified of the public heartgg by wil. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tent —iveiy approved by Resolution No. 88 -020. P -pectfull, submitted ry �.fy GAyn Rre4:.0 :dlw Attlrhments • i 285, I IMME 1. V r,. I , 1. �.i'IIhd son Clark for tk, City of laacbs Qtoaasye. do Imabr wr: Coat as __ Ja-,v. is' I"y at spredsately �2. o'alaak A.Me (a.r w y.s. ). 1 Mpsd.L!f is the Cusumano 1ruaN of tba /ALCM Stater loK- K•fiao lertet at 9N7 ladvess Canter Sd +n, a letter aliraeaM to era/ raorUrS City Camcil Meeting. rcbruary 3. 1986, at 7330 P.M. -- See attarbal list for addresses lipedt Kmvie- A //.,. Al— IIrtel IIAAZ,,15—�L1?2 (ratan to Clty ClerYa Cfficr after nigaW r r; } a ■ r Steven Ford The Wiliiam Lyon Company 8510 Archibald Avenue, Suite B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Annexation No. 35 to Street Maintenance District No. 1 and Annexation Mo. 7 to Street Lighting Malnteno::e District ". 3 for Tract Nees. 13440, l3µ1, 1542 and 13445 SCE Developiant, Incorporated 22001 DD, Gt rive. Suite 240 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Annexation No. 35 to Street Maintenance District No. 1 and Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for Parcel Map 10617 Jeffrey Schlosser Schlosser Forge Ce pany 11711 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Annexation No. 35 to Street Maintenance District No. 1 and Annexatirn No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for DR 81 -09 Bruce Barnakfan The Barnakfan Company 8540 Vineyard Avenue, Suite 510 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Annexation No. 35 to Street Mairtenance District No. 1 and Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for DR 87 -21 and OR 87 -15 r Thomas Ktndberg Russell - Stanley West, Incorporated 949 Santa Antra Avenue Rancho Cucamaiga, CA 91730 RE: Annexation No, 12 to Landscape Maintenance NOR 86-11 District No. 3 for Tract asp A RESOLUTION NO. gg' A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 12 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEP(ING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10617, OR 87 -21, OR 67 -15, OR 81 -09 AND MDR 86 -24 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of January, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention NO. 88 -020 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -020 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention an file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement•, was duly and'lega7ly posted in the ties, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adcption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -020, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, fort, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposeL work. SECTION 1: It is he. eby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to th!' District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -020, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report tiled by the Engineer i ei�[y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessmen n e nginearIs Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin until7a-fte-r-10 percent of said tracts have been occupied. 111�g8 �s i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 ANRERATION MD. 12 For Parcel Map 10617, DR 87 -21, OR 87 -15, Dk 87 -09 and MDR 86 -24 SECTICtI 1. Authors for Neport This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 11 Divcaping 15 of Lighting Streets and h1972hwi /, Code, State of California SECTION 2. General Descrlotion This City Council has elected to annex all new dovelopments into Landscape Maintenance District The Council 1pensia sdnoesboe maintained will have an effecupon aleveomtmettinday. an All landscaped the recorded Map areas as roadway right- of-way ore easements dtoobe gr shown anted tot' City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications = The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the Referencaotsihereby madeatoatheovsub�ecthdevelopmentnplannm ditheiassessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and S' specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby mrde a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or/by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost date. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was forced in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the project boundary only as stipulated In the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. 0 CL SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or parcel in Zone 2. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscil year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landsr pe and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineers Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and opts public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year to Hay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a ;.ublic .earing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. r .r �Y r .y a w, Total cost • assessment unit for year and month 0 x S.30 • f 0 /year 0 /mo. /acre Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A•, by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. s s- Zone 2 is cemprised of all other projects that are being ,nexed or will be 4 annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed r? on net acre basis for tho maintenance of landscaped median islands'on Haven is Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and some parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance Cistrtct No. 3 including Annexation No. 1 is as follows. Zone 1 _ Existing District Total estimated maintenance cost $2,070 Assessment units a Total cost - assessment unit for year and month sj0070 • 3253.75/year or 521.56 /mo. /lot Zone 2 Existing Annexation New District Ho. 12 Total Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. 0 0 0 Assessment units, acres 380,518.93 51.76 380,570.69 Total cost • assessment unit for year and month 0 x S.30 • f 0 /year 0 /mo. /acre Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A•, by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. s s- a r i' In In r P a Y Properties and lmprovments to be included within Annexation No. 12 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE NOR 86-24 9.54 DR 87 -09 17.40 DR 87 -15 1.64 DR e7 -21 6.25 PM 10617 16_93 6th Street 51.75 IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION NO. 1 Area Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 I { ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM `r LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 rt ANNEXATION NO. i Z E a i LOT 1 10T a I =V r� Lor 3 IIT S. ..,m T a 1aT a I LOT ■ tot . 1a_ _ WT a weft -ft e \(��. CITY OF RANCHO CMAUNIONGA PM t0(e t7 ENGINEERING DIVISION nn VICINITY MAP N h L5 rL–Al �w I w•M rEL-o I�I I� .-6, � 0-2, nn ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION NO. dZ 17.-71� vuU�3 •--m , . ' — �� +vend � .•., a,IM, r�YrY MI YEA I r.w rwl rr 1 10- nY �-- C n OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP A N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0..3 ANNEXATION NO. 1 Z i S t rE to 1 ht 4` ,I, 9`.W!u, CITY OF RANCHO C[JCAMONGA c� ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP n N A' i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION NO. I Z c r TC C` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA t% A l3 ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP r N CITY OF RANCHO CUCADIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Summary vacation of Cleveland Avenue between 7th Street and the A.T. & S.F. Railroad (y -069), located between Milliken Avenue and Haven Avenue, in connection with Aaend3ent (07- 04) to the Access /Circulation Plan for the Industrial Area Specific Plan to eliminate Cleveland Avenue RECt11N'ci1DATICK: It is recavaonded that the City Council adopt the attached resolution summarily vacating that portion of Cleveland Avenue between 7th Street and the A.T. & S.F Railroad and authorizing the City Clerk to record said resolution. Background /Analysis General Dynamics has requested the vacation of Cleveland Avenue as shown on Exhibit 'B' in connection with their project, Conditional Use Permit 87 -42. The Planning Commission at its meeting of January 13, 1988, approved the protect and recoomended the vacation of Cleveland Avenue. A request to amend the circulation element of the Industrial Specific Plan to eliminate this portion of Cleveland Avenue is also on tonight's agenda for Council approval. This portion of Cleveland Avenue is unimproved and does not provide access to an existing developments. The westerly 30 feet was vacated in June of 1981 with the development of the property to the west. That property takes access frog Toronto Avenue as sham in Exhibit 'B'. A circulation pattern for the area to the east which is vacant at this time will be established when future development takes place. Respectfully submitted, RM:BK:sd Attachment W �{4 rl IO.N...4..». A....I.b.. me. v 50m w NuA 09n9n c~ I1109 Nw kws S~ SIM 110 !cal 0490. CaeMlno 93121•raS ahn us-sm y PAX(SIM 4U-0SIS TELEX dp1.0 KSA UI i City of Rancho Cuca anp Engineering Deoarternt 9320 Basel llr Roan P.O. Box 007 Rancho OXAM npa. G 91730 Swjoct: Vacation at CIM ,elano Avenin pear Sir /Mooaf NovMarr 17. 1937 Ourral DVrnlcs Corporation replleata ter vacation Of Clavelano Avemn batWe3n ttv northerly rigntbt -w" of Seventh Street ISM the At Inssn. Topeka ano Santa re Pal Iroeo Rlghtbtilay. The property Net at Clevalano AV&V_V Is the only proprty not wxaa by General Dynw-Ics that Is st1`0016^ by thr vacation. T.hls prgrrty Is aOCesslbl• by wy of Toronto AvwvM. With Elghth Street vacatatl, the 7bo" reftrafhC portion of ClsYSland Avenln serves no plypose an0 Is not Eeblrable for tha Ultimate dew eloparnt at the aajacant property. Attached is the anarabrla» tee at $125.00. Please Call MC it you haIM any oLmstiont. Mi NI L. Stevens, R.C.E. 925293 pr iaent /Principal CIVII Engineer 20 r M.S:csk VACATION OF CITY OF TML- CLEVELAND AVE. RANCHO CU(.AMONGA Tarim: LF -TTER L)F REOUEST ENGINEERING DrVEHION E1CFi BM. A dq9 �x 4w f I � VA<44rr NrnousvNAL VAC4Vr I NaRittxcsE AV `irTrY OF VACAT/DN OF N ITai& CLEVELAND AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'l7rMAREA To BE VAC 7*E.D ENGINEERING DIVISION EXEM: it d " _ 30b g0 1 RESOLUTION NO. T Z-O&a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU(AMD%IGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE BETWEEN 7TH STREET AND THE A.T. 6 S.F. RAILROAD WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 0330, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of •he City Street hereinafter more particulkrly described; and WHEREAS, the- City Council found that the portion of Cleveland Avenue between 7th Street and the A.T. & S.F. Railroad has not been used for street purposes for five consecutive years. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: - - SECTiON 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ma esrder vacating that portion of street on Map Y -069 or. file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit •A°, and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said por of n—W- Cleveland Avenue no longer constitutes a street or pabllc utility easement. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resblution--Toba recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. 3� RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 EXHIBIT •AI Legal Description A strip of land 30 feet in width over that portion of the unnamed street, (known as Cleveland Avenue), as shown on the map of Cucamonga lands in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said county bounded as follows: On the North by the easterly projection of the North line of Parcel 27 of Parcel Map No. 6194 as per map recorded In Parcel Map Bonk e2. Pages 62 through 66 inclusive par records of said recorder. On the South by the easterly projection of the.South line of Parcel 11 of said Parcel Map No. 6194. On the Nest by the East lines of said Parcel Nos. 11 and 27. On the East by a line parallel with and 30 feet easterly of the East lines of said Parcel Nos. 11 and 27. z YZ r s� 'e ,cx1a� .cue. ear eva��'r�m> s EXHIBIT "B" Fesoiutlon No. O b „{ ART l'1 C) -4 IN, _bz rn" a �• e 75 k� -- l.tl i yr grow" vuvauuvawra - MEMORANDUM January 29, 1988 ' TO: Mayor and Members of City Council, City Manager PROSU Jim Martin, Plan Check Coordinate j`^' SUBJECfi FOLLOW UP REPORT ON TILE DUST CONT L ISSUES AT NORTHVIEW DRIVE, TERRA VISTA As of this writing negotiations are underway between Lewis -Homes - and the affected homeowners of Tracts 12590 -3 and 12590 -4 andr Itappaarsvaj go dh f at the e f fort,oas ro ayedn bygone oftthe1886 homeowners today, Is being made by Lewis to repair the damage causod by the wind driven dust. On Saterday, Januarp 23, a claims adjuster represonting Lewis Homes rlsitad the subject homes and prepared a sport of the damage. The results of Lila report should be available prior to the Council meeting. To date It appears the only unresolved Issue relates to how Lewis will rectify the lawn damage. The original graded lots on the north ends of Tracts 12590 -3 and 12590 -4 have had a sprinkler system Installed to control future wind driven duet. Tract 12670, located adjacont to Milliken south of Baseline was scheduled to have soil stabilizer Installed this past week, however Installation may have been delayed due to recent high winds. Building and Safety has received a verbal ccmnitment from Grupe Development Co. to proceed with the restoration of the culvert which runs north to south above the storm drain line within their development. Grupe has asked to City to arrange a mooting to lay to rest any problems, whlch relato to the site drainage, that could be encountered by filling the culvert. This meeting will take place during the week of February 1, 1988- Next, a letter was sent to the County Department of Agriculture requesting they increase the level of enforcement the City of Rancho Cucamonga is new receiving. Though no formal written response has been recelvud back, we ha JO received discourging news from their field representative, Allen Smith. He indicated Say �_ s r -Memo: .Mast Con trai;,t+'• �. January 28, 1988 e''•':, _ -, - ,r - .r, +,a Page 2 that the Cointy.wac already ,operating et maximum potential and'an Increase of onforcement °fn,'our elty was' not feasible. Llkewiso he eluded to soma discussion to eliminate the,City of Banchoi,r Cucamonga 'from their aecaforrespooslbillty. We hope to receive - formal rosponee et , to oue,lfoi4 soon.• When received we will Inform the Council as to itsjoontent. y +: Lastly, Building and Safety has Initiated a system to log, and track, Incoming dust' control complaints. Upon receipt the complaints will be handled In the most efficlent'and effiative way possible. • - - , JM:ll P n, i Q rP -4;Q. t, , t .Y e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 3, 1988 , TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Robert A. Rizzo Assistant City Manager BY: Diane O'Neal Administrative Intern SUBJECT: CITY 'IN- MOUSE" RECYCLING This is lnformbtion regarding developing an 'In- House''recycling program •or the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The items to be considered for recycling within the City are white paper and aluminum cans. Staff has arranged to meet with Reynolds Aluminum and Garden'State Paper the week of February 8, 1988 to discuss what containers and equipment wou -1 be needed, and the cost and benefits involved with recycling all cans and uhite paper. The Administration Department is also evaluating the cost of providing necessary collection equipment, containers, and 'add -on' trays necessary for recycling in City Hall, Lions Park Community Center, and the Neighborhood Center. If you have any questions, please contact me. 10bao�1 Salo i ' e �,NO COUNTY SH�pFFs 9 ,2 "D efarmi To ro SgrM" ttf H ' January 18, 1888 ✓ ?? LAUREN WASSERdL01 ?•' -� r- C! of Rancho Clean: ,`�t; ^ •� City Hall, P.O. Box 807th 3 �`i:� -' Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 01730 1 � Dear Laurin: �– / i Flo3 d TN11r.9. " Pursuant to your comrousatfon with Deputy Chief Tom lVickuM in.� reference to the na�cotfc selrur• assets, 1 _agrco, that your eth 9 entitled to the benefits of this recent lati: SAs`y?ur probably imaw, (taus seized are dtstributed proportionatoly to the�,a.gene[es directly inwtxd to Hie case. !Ve are presently develop c. method,thet w1R.be utilfzcd to distribute Ards to all cities tirder'continet. An aud/L:oJ.'tho4oiiure•asseu to,data -has revealed that the cify.of Rant4ln:CUCamonga•has.4' f' cidences whero corA assets have been recovered. Thwe en as areas follows `+ - C —B Date -. Amount:;,_ ; r 12 -03-81 $ 502• _ ` -�, 8703383 ,r 12 -18-81 $ 727' - •'-'87037730: 12- 22-87 $1"060 87038036 12 -31-87 $ 49S 87039824 Total $2,784 All of the atnve- listed ccses are presently being processed, and it generally takes anywhere from 1 to 2 ypars'to get' a final disposition in these matters, 1 car assure you that upon receipt of those funds, an accounting will be made and we will then get together to dete,mtne what equipment should be purchased for the staff at the Rancho Cucamrnga Station with those funds. Pmt Office Box 569, Sin Hanmdlno, CA 92403 Telephone: (714) 3833731 , ys'Ya a r - 3Y.a.'y +.�xwJ 9`Y � �.- �`9'3i.'i.i _� -a ^• V a V- �':.KEl.�rvh^ Cu Y. Jmraary 18, 1998 Page TWo 1 have enctosed copies of the State and Federal selrure Law, and I wt6 i also see that you are provsded a rummary Of the Sate and Federal seUum r law criteria withtn the next 9 to 4 woekx :r Sincere ' : It I .r FLOYD TIDWHLIe She /f w FT /Mt Enclosures 30S n Aye v •. E 2� �r i4* CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 19, 1988 70: City Counci �1 FPAN: Dennis Stou &rid Pamela•Wright SUBJECT: SUBCOMMITTEE INTERVIEWING HISTORIC PRESERYKfI04 tawrssrulim The subcommittee interviewed eleven candidctes for the _four Historic Preservation Cowissia3 seats up for„ review. - They,._.., _ were: Richard Guzzi, Diane Lafrenz, Bob Schmidt, Debra Slmp,An. — Melicent Arner,,Karsha Banks, Alan Haskvttz. Debbie Baker, Lon Wolf, Ronald Confair, and Shirley Barden. The subcommittez recommends the reappointment oft Historic Preservation Commissioner Bob Schmidt, Helicent Arner, and Marsha Banks. Further, the subcommittee recommends the appointment of Alan Haskviiz to replete the Commission seat recently vacated by Maxine Strane. BB:kck Attachment I _ ao9 �A e a• e r ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQ* DEC 181991 CITUM'S AMICATION To NnR on I$t9t10�it'1t1t2t3t4r5tB HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE NANS ly/onl ✓ ire- AZMUS_ %bile (2AA1Rt/ LIp Cobb l/N ?11008 /rS/1 -y95/L oCCCpAnoq eelj lL l A4e.,r, EDOCAIIOM: (lilt highest 7sar toeplataC end all degreaa) Are thare any rortcia7 eteainis you could not watt II eo, please list. ___ Wh7 are you interested in this poe {Host ��*� %�!�r•r.. —...- Q. arm.., �,- :. What do you consider to be your mjor qualifications? Pl f6rr T..... A'. !hT/ -frtlf EEFUMCEE: 1. 2. ]. 3/0 n Resume' Names Al an Paul Haskvitc Address 9655 Carrari Court Alta Loma, California 91701 Telepnone %714) 945 -9942 wealth: Excellent %:resent s of s Education t. ,a Vern• university, administrative credential. .. Master of Artsi English and history, Cal Stat4, LOS Angeles 3. bachelor of Education] Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland a nacnelor of SCSfnCei JOUrnaltss, business, Cal Poly. v .aacciats of Artsl English, L'haffwy College. i.. Soecial eaucation cradwntsal, York University, Toronto, Ontario 7 rAXtOrai candidate, folklore, Memorial University, St. Mhn'S Related university Education A.tdlo-vswtl Fanshawe College Computers, aatnt L1wer2ne6 Collagf nusueaos O9y, PLASlm Of Man, O•tawa, Onta.-io Fro,easional Experience and Ho,,J 5flocteu Bost Outstanding aiddle school teacher in Cal tiornla for uccial studies �i -c7,. Developed ,olk 1140 museum in N"fom.dtand woried on Cnase Mills inn acceptance as historical witiding "*tad in xho s tdio of artists Over 15 yearn of experience in education, -II grade levels, oriedry through col pegs, incluaina adult stlool. _uoJect areas include creative writing, tasting, special education, phyoical education, art, English, sou al studies, sociology and work as vice- 7rincipal Ie a SA'E Sendai 0+19anized both academic and athletic events as well as handling oublicity ono community affairs. interview experience with both elementary and ssconaary canaicaces and Hinton, Day coordinator. 3 �a- 4 v i FACE 2 —• Additional, Data 4 <. Master teacher scholarship award winner for outstanding achievement ae a supervising teacher Nominated as outstanding graduate student, Cal State Los Angeles. Current positione teachers social studies, English, SIP coordinator, department } need, Suzanne Middle Schools Walnut, Calif. Related experience 1. Six years experience with Reivssiance Consulting, tutxing and curricultu design programs for special children as well as publicity and advortlsing programs for small businesses. 2. Seven years of Journalism experience including adltcrship, Pacific Lifel public relations director for Fare Bureau News, Mid -State Fair, and Chaffey College. Aeporter for Northeast Newspapers. 3. other won experience includes librarian, Secretary of State project director and coordinator, folklore archivist, photographers tutor in cosputers, arts and award winning author. Fuolications A list of international publications and copies are available upon request. They u.clude articles on education, CAP writing improvements, historys public relations, safety, socizldgys personnel and related areas. The latest its in Tnurst, October issue. Other iecent Accomplishments 1. Numerous writing awards Z. Fhotograpny featured on television 3. Teacher of Canadian art champions a Speaker on critical thinking 4. Soeaaer Annual California Humanities Conference c. Teaching activities featured in several newspapers and on television 7 P�oliutions pending in Thrust and kapp:n 6. SIP coordinatorl oudgeting specialist; curriculum design specialist for GATE program Aefevences utters of cnaractsr and professional r^fsrence are available upon request. A personnel file is available at Cal Poly University, Pomona, Calif. 313 x Fli-f, . =1h Position Alta Loma Cucamonga Et1wanda At Large At Largo At Large Also Intervieved: Alyce Baldarelli Carol A. Otto Gasper Cario Ronald A. Confair ■ CITY COUNCIL ADVISORY COMMISSION SUBLOMt1ITTEE Appointannts :awe Jezec Campbell George tataanr. Andy Solo uno Ray Mclivaia Pat Gearhart Unexoir_d Term Tiina Ross (am Expires 12/89 Expires 12/89 Expires 12/89 Expires 12189 Expires 12/89 Expires 12/88 .-III S i� -14 C-f 6 I I�DPMENTS. INC ` ,4►- iMANSON� -IDEVE 4 _ ' February 3, 1888 - - -`tQ Rte: n m cu e� Pit Honorable Mayor Members of the City Council ip d y 9320 Baseline 'Road CO in z Rancho Cucamonga, California 81730 i t Attention: Linda Beet n, Gentlemen: ' Please accept our request for continuance of Parcel Map # 109T2. Your staff hag been moat ccoporativa in helping uu �r resolve all ensinearivs and planning Isattere. The unresolved - •,,.._. I� itom which nausea ua to requeau contincance is the signature of the Parcel May by the Property caner, That signature should next City obtained soon il a coma" mooting. Parcel Map 'csn be heard Very truly y /onrp. t• l Craig age r, Vice reaidont CP/bp i I a.s. - rxi o... nn.w as- mr. bOW cart. -nns, me ""M W