Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/03/16 - Agenda Packet�y PACE. City Council Agenda March 16, 1928 �tyA r All items submitted for the City Council Agenda vast be In these is 5.00 rtinon pm.. LheeMednesdaY Priorbtottthe City Clerk's Office receives all such Items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1, Pledge of Allegiance to flag. 2. Roll Call: Buquet Stout Wrig� 0 ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of Linda an ciSchool n leadinli Etlwandaa High too theCaliforniaState Bicentennial Constitution Competition. C. COYSENT CALENDAR The fallowing Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Item may be removed by a Councllmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1 Approval of Minutes: January 13, 1988 February 11, 1988 2. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 3/3/88 and 3/9/88 1 and Payroll ending 3/3/88 for the total amount of $1,412,097.67. 3 Alcoholic Beverage Application for un Sale Beer E Wine 9 Eating Place, The Sassy Steer, Amin and Nazir Oiga, SU30 Vineyard Ave 4 Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer b Wine 11 Eating Place, Rocky's Jr. New York Pizzeria, Nasser Dadrass, 7251 A Haven Avenue. 5 Approval for Destruction of City documents. 13 �tyA r '^ a City Council Agenda March 16, 1988 PAGE 2 4 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -128 14 A RESOLUTION OF TIIF. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS NlIILII ARE MO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 6. Approval of payment for Joint Powers Agreement - Lawsuit 16 Against San Bernardino County regarding Court Fines. �.� 7. Approval to allow the review of the adopted conceptual 17 a 1 design for Creekstde Park. y 9 Approval of support for the League of California Cities 25 1967 Mater Policy Statement. r RESOLUTION N0. 8829 55 k' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 1 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE 1967 MATER POLICY STATEMENT ADOPTED BY THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 9. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I an. 55 fi for the proposed Victoria Street Improvement from Etlwa nda Avenue to East Avenue and adoption of the attached Resolution and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. an and Broad RESOLUTION N0. 88430 57 Land Company. A RESOLUTION OF T4E CITY COUNCIL OF 7`.IE CITY OF RANCHO CULNIONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED VICTORIA STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM ETINANDA AVENUE TO EASf AVENUE 10. Approval to Quitclaim Lot O, Tract No. 12942, located 69 within the Ceryn Planned Community to Kaufm ' I. an and Broad Land Company. r i PAGE City Council Agen�a > ° March 16, 1988 3 t RESOLUTION NO. 88 -102 70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO ^' BE QUITCLAIMED LOT 0, TRACT NO. 12942 ;i 1;. Approval of Contract Change Order No. 3 (CO 86 -042) to 74 Associated Engineers in the amount of $4,700.00 for ( Hillside Road Reconstruction project between Malachite Avenue and Archibald Avenue for design of a master planned ctorm drain to be paid from Systems Development Fees, bringing the contract total to $22.1154.53. , 12. Approval of the Release of Improvem:nt Contract and Lien 76 Agreement from Gilbert M. Cebailos and Barbara J. Cebalins, upon the lat'er's compliance of the payment stipulated in the aforesaid contract. RESOLUTION NO, 88.131 79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL JF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTR,CT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM GILBERT M. CEBALLOS AND BARBARA J. CEBALLOS 13. Approval to fund excess accrued vacation time from 80 reserve vacation accrual fund in the amount of $5,570. 14. Approval to award a bid for consultant services to J. S. 82 Davidson Associates, Inc. In the amount of $33,046 for design of traffic signal and street improvements at the Intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. Improvements will also include storm drain construction, utility relocations and right -of -way acquisition. The Improvements are needed for the immediate and future safe and orderly flow o7 traffic through the intersectinn. 15 Approval to authorize the advertising of the 'Notice 84 Inviting Bids' for the Archibald Avenue Entry Monuments Improvement Project, located on the northeast and northwest corners of Archibald Avenue and 4t1i Street, to be funded from the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Account No. 40- 4130 -8767. n it PAGE �. 4!01; City Council Agenda March 16, 1988 4 RESOLUTION NO 88-132 85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT- COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARCHIBALD AVENUE ENTRY MONUMENTS', IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ' ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. " 16. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -031) for the Arrow 89 Route Reconstruction, Phase I Improvement Project located between Turner Avenue and Archibald Avenue on the north side awarded to Fontana Paving, Incorporated, for the amount of $243,900.00 to be funded from the Systems Fund, account number 22- 4637 -8735. 17. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement 90 Security for Parcel Map 10782 (DR 87 -26), located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Watson Land Company. RESOLUTION NG. 88-133 91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVINC PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10782, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10782), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY 18. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement 93 Security for Tract Ne.'s 13555, 13556, 11558, 13560, 13561, 13563, and 12643 bounded or. the north and south by the extension of Banyan Street and Highland Avenue and bounded on the east and west by Rochester Avenue and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Marlborough Development Corporation and Kaufman and Broad. RESOLUTION NO. 88-134 95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NO.'S 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561, 13563 AND 12643 19. Approval of Parcel Map 9350, located at the northeast 97 corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, submitted by The William Lyon Company. PAGE City Council Agenda March 16, 1988 1 5 RESOLUTION N0. 88435 1 98 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9350 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 9350) 20. Approval to accept improvements, Release of Bonds and I 100 filing Notice of Completion for CUP 84 -37, located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $215,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 88436 1 101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0. 1ANCd0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 84 -37 ANC AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK I 21. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and I 102 filing Notice of Completion for DR 85 -02, located on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5 24,850 RESOLUTION NO. 88437 1 103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCUNCIL OF THE CITY I OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 85 -02 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TAE WORK 22 Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and I 104 filing Notice of Comr %cion for Parcel Map 9481, located on the northeast corner of 7th Street and Hellman Avenue. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $106,000 ti .15 PAGE City Council Agenda March 16, 1988 tFE1 � f RESOLUTION HO. 88.138 105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CIICAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 9481 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION fOR THE WORK 23. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and 106 filing Notice of Completion for CUP 85 -12, located on the north side of Church Street, east of Archibald Avenue. Certificate of Deposit (Street) $27,000 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -139 107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVE14ENTS FOR CUP 85 -12 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE Of COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 24. Approval of a Subordination Agreement (CO 88 -032) for lu8 Parcels 1 And 2 of Parcel Map 8063 located on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue, submitted by Foothill /Ifellman Investment, Limited. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -140 110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC110 CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM FOOTHILL /HELLMAN INVESTMENT, LIMITED AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK. TO SIGN SAME 25 Approval of Drainege Acceptance Agreement (CO 88 -033) 111 for DR 87 -21, located on the south side of Sixth Street, approximately 487 feet west of Lucas Ranch Road, submitted by Andrew, 0-uce and Jana Barmakian. RESOLUTION NO. 88441 112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -21 4 tFE1 � f PAGE City Council Agenda March 16, 1988 �i M 26. Set public hearing for April 20, 1988 - Approval of a 113 Resolution Passing on Reapportionment Report for the Storm Drain Channel (Assessment District 06 -2) for the Lot Line Adjustmant for APN 201 - 271 -72, APN 201- 271.72, and Tract Map 12873, and giving preliminary approval. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -144 114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PASSING ON REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT FOR THE STORM DRAIN CHANNEL (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86 -2) FOR THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR APN 201- 271 -71, APH 201- 211 -72, AND TRACT MAP 12873, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING 27. Set public hearing for April 20, 1988 - Approval to 116 Annex Tract Nos. 12643, 13555, 13556, 1'558, 13560, 13561. 13563, OR 87 -11, OR 87 -26 and Parcel Map 9350 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No 40. RESOLUTION NO. 88443 117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COI' "CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. Cn- IFORNtA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION HG. 40 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88444 132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARIN i ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMEN) DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 40 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT P.O. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO �i M v City Council Agenda March 16, 1988 PAGE hearing for April 20, 1988 - Approval to G 134 l Hap 9350 located on the north side of Base etween Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 as o. 9. RESOLUTION NO. 88445 135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 9 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 88-146 141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. INTENT ION TOORDER THELANNEiXATIONC TOISTREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION ND. 9 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AMU OFFF.RIhG A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 29. Set public hearing for April 20, 1988 - Approval to 143 Annex Tract Nos. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561, and 13563 (Caryn Planned Comaunity) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 as Annexation No. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -147 144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO 3 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 ti �i d PAGE City Council Agenda March 16, 1988 SESOLUTION NO. 88-148 156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ThE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. S. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 3 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR ' 'ARING OBJECTIONS THERETO for 30. Approval 158 AnnexpuORi87 26r(PM 1078 ).ilo atedlaet the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue to Street Lighting Paintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 13. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -149 159 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 13 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RESOLUTION MO. 88456 172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. DECLARIN3 ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 13 TO STREET IIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 31 Set public hearing for April 20, 1988 - Approval to 174 Annex OR 87 -11, located on the north side of 19th Street. east of Hellman Aveiiae, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 43. PAGE 41-111elln�ll City Council Agenda March 16, 1988 I "10 N.O RESOLUTION NO. 88 -151 175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 43 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88.152 100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 43 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 32. Set public hearing for April 20, 1988 - Approval to 182 Annex OR 87 -26 (PM 10782) located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 17. RESOLUTION NO. 88.153 163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 17 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO 88-154 109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3. AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 17 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO N.O PAGE City Council Agenda March 16. 1988 11 1 33. Set public hearing for AF,•11 20, 1988 - Approval to 191 Annex Tract No, 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561, and 13563 (Caryn Planned Community), to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 88455 192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 3 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 6 RESOLUTION 140. 88456 203 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNPA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, 440 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 3 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND G ACT OF AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACEIFOR HEARINGIOBJECTIONS THERETO D. CONSENT ORDINANCES the The lfirst9reOrdinances time of Second routine be acted Council at onent meewithout discussion. sion Clerk be for will read the title. Any item can removed discussion. 1 FNYIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA LOMUNITY FLAN NON Ni 88 -0 -CITY OF R CHO LUC ONGA - A proposal to amend the Victoria ommun ty Pan text to require a Conditional Use Permit for shopping centers and certain cowercial uses. n. 1 PAGE City Council Agenda Ma I 12 rch 16, 1988 i I ORDINANCE NO. 341 ( sncond reading) 205 `r AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING w I VICTORIA PLANNED COWOINITY AMENDMENT 88 -01 TO }ln- MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO REQUIRE A FOR SHO' 46 CENTERS ' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND CERTAIN USES IN THE CorAERCUU_ STANDARDS 4: I SECTION OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN Y, ENV IRbNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COj#jUNITY � ND NT - to -amend the errs vista Community Pan test to reQ -and ng centers and certain commercial uses. ORDINANCE NO. 342 (second reading) 212 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT1 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -01, TO MODIFY THE COMjUNITY PLAN TEXT TO REQUIRE A ICONDITIONAL DO CERTAIN USES IN THE OFFICEOANDNCOMMERCIAL STANDARDS SECTION OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The fo:Iowing items have been advertised and /or postei as public ghtorra9otvs public tebylaw. The chair will Open the 222 1, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT D E 1 the eve oPment D s r cts Nap rom Office /Professional (OP) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) for approximately 3.45 acres of lend, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellauin Avenue - APN 208 - 202 -13, 14. (Continued from February 17, 1988) �n ,— - -- I PAGE a,+ 9 City Council Agenda ' March 16, 1988 13 No* RESOLUTION NO. 88 -094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DENYING A RCQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP, ODA 87 -I1, FROM OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR A 3.45 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 208 - 202 -13, 14. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88- 299 request to amend Oe Genera Plan Land Use ap from 'Office° to •lleighborhood Commercial* for approximately 3.45 acres of land, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hallman Avenue - APN 208 - 202 -13, 14. (Continued from February 17, 1988) 302 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGI., CALIFORNIA, DENY1Nf: A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP OF THE GENERAL PLAN, GPA 88 -01A, FROM OFFICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 3.43 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUYHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 208 - 202 -13, 14. 2 VACATION OF E144ETT WAY - located between Summit Avenue 305 and Tract _ 9. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -157 307 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF EFV4ETT WAY BETWEEN SUMMIT AVENUE AND THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT 11549 3 STREET NAMC CHANGES FOR TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND ELM 314 NN propose to designate West Terra Vista afar w y and East Terra Vista Parkway and to designate West Elm Avenue with the Terra Vista Planned Community. No* t:. tY, al°p+2� City Council Agenda March 16, 1988 PAGE 14 kE50LUTION NO. 88358 326 A P.F.SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUiirIL OF THE C1TT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING A STREET NAME CHAHGt HO. 88 -01 REQUESTING A NAVE CHANGE IO DESIGNATE NEST TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AID EAST TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND TO DESIGNATE WEST ELM AVENUE WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY 4. COMM�INITY DEY EI.ODMENT OLtlCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR FISCAL nary tatement of 328 opt ono t e re ommun ty jectives for the fiscal year 1988 -89 and preliminary selection of projects bl.en on an antic grant 5417,000, RESOLUTION NO. 88 -159 338 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988 -1989 AND PRELIMINARY SELECTION OF PROJECTS BASED ON AN ANTICIPATED GRANT OF $417,000 5. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONIIECT -ON WITH: A. ANNEXATION NO. 11 FOR OR 87 -24 LOCATED ON THE Ur%IND 1 R 0 335 R IIW SIRM] LIUMMU M I NC U ICI r1u. b. RESOLUTION NO. 88-160 340 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF RANC,10 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE WORK IN - OHNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENAHCE DISTRICT Mr. 6 AND ACCEPTING T4E FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 87 -24 B. ANNEXATION N0. 8 FOR DR 87 -43 LOCATED NORTHLOST 346 R R R RX N R C R1 I ND CN 0 0 T 1GH N N 65I `iRC N.3. S�y� n - I 0 / PAGE " City Council Agenda March 16, 1988 i5 F. PUBLIC. HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public te.tiwny. None submitter', N! 347 RESOLUTION 110. 88-161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING )HE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNE RATION NO. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 87 -43 C. ANNEXATION NO. 38 FOR DR 97 -24 AND OR 87 -43 354 7DU /C C L TO R GH TG -1 - _. Art TNTFY�tiLETDI�. CEO. 355 RESOLUTION NO. 88-162 A RESOLUTIC41 OF THE C!TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALi,nRNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION W.TH ANNLAA11ON 110. 38 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 87 -24 AND OR 87 -43 D ANNEXATION NO. 'S FOP DR 87 -24 LOCATED ON THE •t 362 FdRT S CORN R O F LO VEDU O H aTR EL L ND N E11 ,IC 01bJKLW RU. J. RESOLUTION NO. 84 -163 363 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUhCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM3NGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE YORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 15 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 87 -24 I F. PUBLIC. HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public te.tiwny. None submitter', N! PAGE r, + City Council Agenda ')j March 16. 1988 '16 n G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair ray open the meeting for public input. 1. SIGN ORDIN.SNCE - Review of changes proposed by Chamber 359 of Commerce. 2. CONSIDERATION OF STAFF'S DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR 418 PERMIT TO CONMURT DRIVE APPROACH N SOUTH S DE 77 HILLSIDE Y Ut M N CANYON WAY B K Y ES II RN1NG C WAY. (continued f rom C Feb, 1988 and Harch 2, 1988 3 DISCUSSION OF TELEPHONE SERVICES IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA. _ 422 rC-o-n—tTn-u-eJ from Mdrch 2, 8 4. ACCEPTANCE OF HERITAGE AND REt, HILL COMMUNITY PARKS 423 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -164 424 A RESOLU ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF HERITAGE AND REL HILL COMMUNITY PARK PROJECTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 5 APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATING NIGHT BLOOMING 425 CEREUS located at 7850 Valle Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, C —TkN 207- 081 -31) RESOLUTION NO. 88-165 436 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE NIGHT BLOOMING CEREUS LOCATED AT 7850 VALLE VISTA AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE i OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK 6. DISCUSSION CF LIBRARY NEEDS ASSESSMENT. 437 LL H. COUNCIL BUSINESS n C,.. '4arch116. 1988 The following items have been requested by the City Council for discusio. the Chair s waynOpeThey h are meeting for 1publicrinput. although 1. CONSIDERATION TO SUPORT THE HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE AND R G li -C MiUNI RESOLUTION N0. 88466 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZING THE HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TRI- COMMUNITIES HERITAGE IU1D SUPPORTING THE PERMANENT INCORPORATION OF THE HISTORIC LEGACIES OF HE COMMUNITIES OF ALTA LOMA. A 1, IDENTIF[UTION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to These items Will not they wish to discuss at the next meeting. discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next neeting. J. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE P03LIC This is the time and dtplace f r the CityiCOUncildfrom the City Council- ends. The City C unc issue recceiveetestimony nand set 0e matter for The City Council tin Comments are to be limited to five a subsequent meeting. minutes Per individual. K. ADJOURNMENT Clerk of the City of Rancho a true, 1. accurate seventy -two March 11, 9 per A.B. 2674 at 9320 -C Base I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Cucamonga, hereby certify that foregoing agenda tusthe meeting (72) hours ptior Line Road. -'17 438 439 January 13, 1988 '- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City If Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, January 13, 1988, in the Rancho Cucamonga. Neighborhood Center, 9191 Arrow Highway. Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called to order at 6:10 P.M. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright, an! Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wassermdn; C +ty Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet; Assistant City Manager, Robert Rizzo; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Brad Buller; City Engineer, Russell Maguire; Building Official, Jerry Grant; Administrative Services Director, James Hart, Resource Center Coordinator, Jerry Fulwood. : * e f ♦ o B. GOALS AND PROGRAM PRIORITIES Mr. Wasservan presented the City Goals, stating that Council needed to spend sow tins to delete, add and /or modify the goals. B1. to provide Cost Effective Public Safet Services - The City's highest priority Includes not only aw enforcement sery ces now provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, but also services provided by the City's Building and Safety Division. The following specific objectives are identified: A. Evaluate and upgrade animal control services to provide better enforcement and improved response time to calls for service. B. Development cooperative strategy with County of San Bernardino and National Forest Service for improved enforcement program in area of entrance to Cucamonga Canyon. C. Install traffic signals in accordance with adopted capital 'Improvement program. Councilman Buquet stated we needed to develop and implement a c..mprehensive Traffic Management Program. 5, city "-ncil Minutes January 13, 1983 Page i m Mr. Wasserman suggested that a separate section be included dealing with traffic. Council concurred that that was A good idea, the Traffic Panagement Program should not be included with Public Safety. ♦ : � r t f F y RP. To Build a Sound Financial Base for the Lommnlf -The development o a sound f nanc al base, particu ar y the sire,, en ng of sales tax revenue, is an s` essential cornerstone for future programs and priuritles. To accomplish this goal, the following specific objectives are identified: f' A. Develop strategy to Increase Redevelopment Agency efforts to -sell the City" to prospective commercial and industrial developers. 7 B. Develop specific strat ,{y to identify and to attract commercial growth + opportunities. r C. Develop incentive programs to encourage commercial growth for City. D. Oeuelop strategy to encourage major corporations :o locate along Raven Avenue Corridor. Councilwoman Wright stated she would like to get a priority listing so staff could commit dollars for 1t. 83. To Encoura a Proactive rather that Reactive !on Ran a Plannin - The City has a significant nvestment n both t me and do lars 1n a General Plan and numerous specific plans. it is essential that the commHnity'n long range planning program continue. The following specific objectives are identified: A. Continued commitment to quality planning of new development. 1. Make retrofit of existing development ccosistent with current planning standards. 2 Continue emphasis on t•wtification of key areas within the City. B. Continued emphasis on quality design and construction (exterior and interior) of single family residences. C. Develop new program to preserve certain heritage trees. F1 F1 `i :urlfi City Council Minutes January 13, 1988 ' Page 3— T�+,a 1. Revise tree removal ordinance. 2. Provide more specific information regarding acceptable replacement trees. D. Development trails Implementation plan. 1. Identify problem areas on existing trails. 2. Develop alternatives foi financing trail improvements and ` maintenance. E. Reconsider minimum lot size in certain areas of City. 1. Identify specific areas. 2. Develop implementation strategy. �. Upgrade southwest Cucamonga area. 1. Identify needs, deficiencies. i 2. Develop implementation and financing strategy S. Upgrade old Etiwanda area. 1. Identify needs, deficiencies. 2 Develop implementation and financing strategy. H. Evaluate critical traffic problems which may occur as City groots. 1. Identify intersections and thoroughfares which will be seriously impacted from future development. 2. Develop program for alleviating those conditions which may be corrected. I Evaluate feasibility of redevelopment of "Old Alta Loma% the area forth of Base Line Road on Amethyst. J. Reduce .-asities in planned communities. 1. Feasibility study to identify issues. 2. Reviaw by City Attorney of potential legal issues. K. To develop policy regarding annexation of Sphere of Influence and City Counc'I Minutes January 13, 1988 Page 4 other annexation issues. yl t Mayor Stout stated that he felt the goal was too specific and that the first paragraph should be more general. f Councilwoman Wright asked If there was a way to deal with affordable housing uithout incurrinp some problems. 4, Mr. W: -man responded that a message has been sent to Supervisor Jon Mikels that u not want mare high - density. Y Mr. Lam stated the problem is that Western Center on Law S Poverty has sued the �¢ City on this issue, and has used language from our own housing element in the lawsuit. They are interpreting that we are specifically limiting low- income V housing In the City. a ' Mayor Stout felt that Item H should be put In the new traffic goals section, also that Items F, G, and I should be combined. Cour:ilman Buquet stated the wording of Item I was applicable for Items F and G. Mayor Stout expressed another word should be used In place of redevelopment in Item I. Council concurred in using the word revitalization. Mayor Stout expressed that Item K should be worded to say 'to develop policy regarding the Sphere of Influence'. Cnuncil discussed Item J, and concurred that it should read °Evaluate densities Citywide to include planned communities'. Item JI should read 'Feasibility study to identify the consequences of density ranges versus assessment levels, traffic levels, ctc'. Add Item J3 which 1s to read 'Possible use of negotiating posture on developer initiated charges'. Louncilman Buquet stated that we needed to have some overlay and pre - annexation agreements with the County. • z w w w 84 To Evaluate Social Services Available to Residents of Rancho Cucamonga - It +s proposed that the City Council identify the social programs to be offered to the community. It is also suggested that the City Council determine not only the extent of involvement in these programs, but also the resources, if any, to be allocated for each program. A. Study feasibility of offering City- sponsored child care programs for employees and citizens (currently in progress). 8 Evaluate feasibility of adding fees to new developments, to finance City Council Minutes _ January 13, 1988 Page 5- day care facilities and programs. C. Evaluate senior citizen nvolvement on key City issues. D. Determine extent of City involve�znt in cultural and art programs. Councilwoman Wright expressed. that Item C4, letter C, should be changed to "Encourage senior citizen involvecent on City issues ", deleting the word "key ". y f f t f• 85. To Build a Sound Financial Base for the Community - The development of a solid economic base, with particular emphasis on strengthening of sales tax revenues continues to be a high priority. Since sales tax is a "discretionary" revenue, it is important that the City do as much as possible to Insure future revenues to provide vital City services. A. Identify specific programs for increasing sales tax and property tax revenues. B. Implement Redevelopment Agency marketing strategy to improve revenue stream (in progress). C Develop program to encourage corporate offices to relocate in Haven Corridor. f f • • ! f 86. To Provide Continued Em hasis on Park Uevelo went and Recreation Pro�ms- Since incorporation, a City has one an outstan ing ,lob of acqu r n9 and developing park sites. It is important that this program continue to future years until all potential parks Identified in the General Plan have been acquired and developed. In addition, It is equally Important that recreation programs be continually reevaluated to be certain that the needs of the community are being met. The following programs are suggested: A. Prepare a development /f Inane Ing plan for Central Park. This should include not only completion of plans, but also a specific program for financing the development of this park. B Continue program to develop and acquire park sites as identified In the C.ty's adopted Gcnaral Plan. C. Reevaluate park development plans to ensure that adequate areas are available for active eparts such as soccer, football and base ball. Councilman Buquet expressed he did not feel that letter A was the No. I priority, lie felt that letter's A and B should be reversed order. City Council Minutes January 13, 1988 Page 6 Councilman King stated that Itea C6 deals with park planning, but not with recreation. Council concurred that soeething should be added regarding the recreation program. L.inc11 concurred to add letter D "Reevaluation of Recreation Programs for CGtmmunity (full use of all resources of City). Councilman King also stated that basketball should be added to letter C. { 87. To provide Infrastructure and Public Improvements to meet the Long -term Needs of the Community. A. Continue commitment to require infrastructure to be installed to, meet ' long range needs of community. B. To develop comprehensive City policy regarding installation of undergrom.d utilities. C To ask Cucamonga County Water Diztrlct to evaluate the continuation of CCWD's policy of permitting the installation of septic tanks above Banyan Street. 88. To Develop an Active Program of Legislative Advocacy on Behalf of the City A. To actively •track• all changes In proposed legislation relating to the operation of park and maintenance districts. B. To actively follow all proposed State and Federal legislation which Impacts the City. C. To improve working relationships with other public agencies which serve the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga. • • • • • e B9. To Improve the Coordination of Public Services which are not provided dlrectty by the City A. Cable Television B Refuse Collection 7� City Council Minutes T January l3, 1988 t Page 7 - C. Library Services D. Mater Services Council concurred that Fire, Animal Control, Ambulance, and Others should be added to this section. ACTION: Council directed staff to make the changes that were outlined, and to set -up a meeting some:!se at the end of February, first of Harch for an all day workshop to develop the goals, object the how -to's of the goals and objectives. perhaps to be set at the Clarion hotel in Ontario. R R R R R C. ADJOURKEN7 The workshop was adjourned at 1 :35 P.M. Approved: " Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk February 17, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ,r. keaular 62etina A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, February 17, 1988, in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at lr 7:32 p.m, by Mayer Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilvembers: Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wrigh•, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. + Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorney, James Markman; City Clerk, Beverly A. Arthelet; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Brad Buller; Deputy City Planner, Otto Kroutil;"'City °• Engineer, Ru -sell Maguire; Senior Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeau; Senior Planner, y" Den Coleman; Associate Planner, Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, Debra Heie�; e� Community Services Administrative Assistant, Paula Pachon. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS 81. Presentation of DAFFODILS by Fran Nan:ano, finerican Cancer Society and presentation of a proclamation to American Cancer Society by City Council, B2. Mr. Wasserman announced that we would like to continua Item El to June 1, 1988, and Item E2 to March 16, 1988, and continue Items G3 and H3 to March 2, 1988. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to continue Item E1 to June 1, 1988, and Item E2 to March 16, 1988. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0 MOTION: Hawed by Wright, seconded by Brown to continue Items G3 and H3 to March 2, 1988 f e f f f f C. CONSENT CALENDAR CI Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 2/3188 and 2/10/88 and Payroll ending 2/4/88 for the total amount of $2,90b,585.15. C2. Approval of Minutes: January 18, 1988, January 20, 1988, February 3, 1988. J i City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 2 C3. Alcohr•lic Beverage Application for Type 020" Off -Sale Beer and Mine, Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc., NNC or Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane. ITEM PULLED FOR D =USSIOH AS REQUESTED BY COUNCILWOMAN WRIGHT. C4. Approval of Parcel Map 10972, located between Highland Avenue and Banyan ,+ Street and between Milliken avenue and the Deer Creek Channel, submitted by Ahmanson Developments, Incorporated. 1988) (1002 -09 HAP PARCEL) RESOLUTION 110. 88 -053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NIHBER 10972 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10972) C5 Approval of Resolution Ordering Preparation of Reapportionment Report for the Storm Drain Channel (Assessment District 86 -2) for the Lot Line Adjustment for APN 201 - 271 -7!, APN 201 - 271 -72, and Tract Map 12873. (0401 -13 DRAIN AD)' RESOLUTION NO. 88 -071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT AND AMENDED ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND ESTABLiSMING REAPPORTIONMENT FEES FOR THE STORM GRAIN CHANNEL (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86 -2) FOR THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR APN 201 - 271 -71, APN 201- 271 -72, AND TRACT HAP 12873 C6. Approval to authorize the City Engineer to issue letters holding the State harmless as a result of imorovements adjacent to Cal Trans rights -of -way within 30 feet of the curb line which are consistent with City issued conditions of approval (1110 -10 STREET PI) C7. Approval to award and execute (CO 88 -018) Professioral Services Agreement with GPS Consulting Engineers to prepare Plans. Specifications and Estimates for Base Line Road Street Improvements, Phase ti from Etiwanda Avenue to Victoria Park Lane. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) RESOLUTION 110. 08 -072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO AWARD AND EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH GPS CINSULTING ENGINEERS OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA TO PREPARE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR BASE LINE ROAD STREET IM°ROVEMEHTS PHASE Ii FROM ET1WANDA AVENUE TO VICTORIA PARK LANE City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 3 CB. Approval to award and execute Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Design Contract Administration to J.F. Davidson Associates (CO 88 -019). The amount not to exceed $20,000.00 is to be paid from various project funds. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) C9. Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Ramco Consultants, Inc. (CO 88 -020) to prepare Right -of -Nay Appraisal Acquisition Services for 19th Street from Zircon to Amethyst. Such work to be done for a fee not to exceed 385,440.00 plus costs for escrow fees, policy title, etc., to be funded from Systems Development Fund. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) CIO. Approval to execute Change Order Ile. 2 (CO 87 -21) for Professional Services Agreement with Morris- Repke, Inc.. to perform Design Administration Services for various pnjects. It is recommended to expand their contract by $36,474.75 to bring their contract total to $69,474 75 to be paid from various project funds. (OE02 -01 CONTRACT) C11. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 4 (CO 08 -114) with Randolph Hlubik Associates, Inc, for a Professional Services Agreement for Plans, Specifications and Estimates for Haven Avenue Median Island Construction. It is recommended to expand their contract by $4,500.00 to bring their contract total to $24,160.00 to be paid from the Beautification Funds. (0602 -01 CONT AMEN) C12. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 2 (CO 85 -79) with Hadole and Associates Civil Engineers and Surveyors for a Professional Services Agreement for Plans, Specifications and Estimates for Haven Avenue Median Island Construction. It is recommended to expand their contract by $9,912.00 to bring their contract total to $76,718.00 to be paid from the Beautification Funds. ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION AS REQUESTED BY COUNCILWOMAN WRIGHT (0602 -01 au AMENI C13 Approval to execute Contract Change Order No 5 (CO 85 -63) for the preparation of designs, construction plans, specifications and cost estimates for the Day Creek Channel improvement project by Boyle- Ludwig Engineering, in the amount of $12,680 bringing the total contract amount to $584,041 to be paid from Day Creek Funds. (0602 -01 CONT AMEN) RcSOLUTION NO. 88 -973 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANG 10 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 5 TO CO 35 -63, AND AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND COST ESTIMATES FOR THE DAY CREFK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT C14 Approval to execute contract with DeArmond Construction (CO 88 -021) for the Etiwanda Cobblestone Curb and Gutter Improvement project located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue from Victoria Avenue to 263 feet north of Victoria City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 4 Avenue and an the west side of Etlwanda Avenue from 10 feet south or Southern Pacific Railroad :Tossing to 280 feet south of the Southern pacific Railroad crossing for the ,.mount of $28,238.50 to be funded from Beautification Funds. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) CIS. Approval to execute contract for the Base Line Road Widening Improvement Protect between Archibald and Hellman Avenues awarded to J.E.G. Cc-istructlon Company, Incorporated (CO 88 -022) for the amount of $264,307.17 to be funded from the Systems Fun ". (0602 -01 CONTRACT) C16. Approval to award the bid for the Improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing Protect to Riverside Construction for the amount of $112,456 with funding from Federal Section 203 Fund and Systems cund. (0601 -01 BID) C17. Approval to accept the Ramona Avenue Reconstruction Improvement Protect from Victoria Street to 19th Street as complete, release bonds and authorlZe-the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $89,529.92. (1110 -10 STREET PI) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE RAMONA AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT FROM VICTORIA STREET TO 19TH STREET AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CIS. Approval to modify and approve the Conditions of Approval on an appeal of the Planning Commission Conditions relating to Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 87 -05 Cross and Crown Lutheran Church confirming Council action of a hear ng held February 3, 1988. ITEM PULLED FOR LISLL'SSION AS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL'd0'AAN WRIGHT. (0701 -06 APPEAL) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -075 A RESOLUTION JF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING AND APPROVING THE CONCITION., OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -05 TO ALLOW THE DF.VE'.OPNENT OF A 4900 SQUARE FOOT SANCTUARY PUILOING, AND OPERAITON 01 AN EXTENDED DAY NURSERY AND PRESCHOOL ON 5 ACRES OF LAND IN YHE VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWEILING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 6723 ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF C19 Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for OR 87 -43, located on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop, east of the intersection with Victoria Park Lane, sutmitted by La Petite Academy. (0602 -01 AGREF IMPR) City Council Ninutet February 17, 1988 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C,TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -43 C20. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12772 -2, located on the south side of Base Line Road, between Ramona Avenue and Turner Avenue, submitted by M 6 5 Residential Development. (0602 -01 AGREE EXTH) RESOLUTION NO. 8G -077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND 1MPROVEMCNT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12662 -2 C21. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extensioni for Parcel Map 9498 (Fourth Street Median), located on the northeast conner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, submitted by Reiter - Rinker Gateway. (0602 -01 AGREE EXAM) RESOLUTION 140. 88 -078 A RESOLUTION OF TIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FCR PARCEL MAP 94SB (FOURTH STREET MEDIAN) C22 Approval to accept Improvements. Release of Bonds, and filing Notices of Completion for: (0602 -01 B01,0 REL) (070A -18 NOT COMPIT) DR 85 -19 and DR 85 -20 - lxated on the northeast corner of Civic Center r 7_ e an UC ca venue. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $7,600 (DR 85 -19) Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $1,000 (OR 85 -20) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 85 -19 AND DR 85 -20 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICF OF COMPLETION FOR THE UORK DR 81 -33 - located at 10220 4th Street, between Turner Avenue end :Cater veil Faithful Performance Bond (Streit) $10,000 City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ^OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 81 -33 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Pareel N3 9301 - located between „oven Avenue and Utica Avenue, north of ersey 9ou evard. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $50,500 RESOLUTION NO. 88.081 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PM 9301 AND AUTHORIZING TPE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DR 85 -24 - located on the north side of Trademark Street, west of Haven venue. Faithful Performance Bond t5trect) $11,000 RESOLUTION N0. 68482 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PJBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 85 -24 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C23 Approval to accept Improvements, release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12530, located on the northwest corner of Church Avenue and Hellma', Avenue. (0602 -01 BOND REL) Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $3,460 C24. Approval of an Indenture between the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (CO 88 -024) and the City for construction of City - maintained landscaped slopes within the Railooad's right -of -Kay, between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard northerly of Base Line Road - submitted by The William Lyon Company. ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION AS REQUESTED BY COUNCILWOMAN WRIGHT (0602 -01 CONTRACT) C25 Set public hearing for March 2, 1986 - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 8A -01B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A reTuest to amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the purpose of accomplishing the following change: The realignment oT Hillside Road to replace the double intersection of Hillside Road and Amethyst Avenue with a single intersection at Amethyst Avenue and a reverse curve between Amethyst Avenue and proposed Klusman Avenue. City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 7 C26. Set public hearing for March 16, 1988 - Approval of Intention to vacate Emmett Nay between Summit Avenue and Tract 11549. (1110 -18 VACATE ST) RESOLUTION NO. 88.083 A RESOLUTION OF TIME CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STA,f OF CALIFORNIA., DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE EMMETT NAY BETWEEN SUMMIT AVENUE AND TRACT 11549 C27. Set public hearing for March 16, 1988 - Approval to Annex DR 87 -24, located on the northwest corner of Buffalo Avenue and 6th Street, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 15. (0401 -03 LNSCAPE NO) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORf FOR ANNEXATION NO. 15 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 15 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C28. Set public hearing for March 16, 1988 - Approvil to Annex OR 87 -24 ind OR 87 -43 (Industrial /Commercial) to Streat Lighting Maintenance District No I as Annexation No. 30. (0401 -03 ST LT MD) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNrIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO 38 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNFXATIOII NO. 38 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 8 �. LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FnR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C29. Set public hearing i'cr March 16, 1988 - Approval to Annex OR 87 -43, located northeast corner Victoria Park Lane and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 as Anntxation No. 8. (0401 -03 ST LT MD) RESOLUTION NO. 88-038 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATIO4 NO. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING HAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITv COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTINS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING H4INTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFk7. ",ING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C30. Set public hearing for March 16, 1988 - iyproval to Annex OR 87 -24, located on the northwest corner of Buffalo a,d 6th Street to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. (0401 -03 ST LT MD) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAP.CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY EMGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RESOLUTION 110. 88 -091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO Councilwoman Wright requested Consent Calendar Item's C3, C12, CIS, and C24 be removed for discussion. City Council Minutes 1 February 17, 1988 i, Page 9 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar minus Items C3, C12, CID, and C24. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. m**.tm Discussion of Item C3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Type 020. Off -Sale Beer and Wine, Circle X Convenience Stores, Inc., NWC or Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane Councilwoman Wright, asked if it was typi :al to approve an Alcoholic Permit before the building was there. Mr. Wasserman responded that often this can happen. ' Mr. Markman, City Attorney, stated the only opposition we can make is if there ' is a huilding code problem that has not been met. Actually the Council is not approving the permit, this is on the Agenda as an informational item only.-­ Councilwoman Brown stated that this parcel is on the next Planning Commission Agenda for a CUP. Mr. Markman stated that some cities require CUP for sny off -site selling of alcoholic beverages. Mr. Buller, City Planner, stated this was not typical. They have been given a .green light" to file by the State. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Stout to receive and file the application. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Discussion of Item C12 Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 2 (CO 85- 79) with Madole and Associates Civil Engineers and Surveyors for a Professional Services Agreement for Plans, Specifications and Estimates for Haven Avenue Median Island Construction. It is recommended to expand their contract by $9,912.00 to bring their contract, total to $76,718.00 to be paid from the Beautification Funds. (0602 -01 CONT AMEN) Councilwoman Wright stated she pulled this Item because it was a last chance to attach a "trailer bill" to something. She wanted to be able to commemorate the work which was done in the past by the City before incorporation. She felt that perhaps rte could have something significant attached to this project. Mayor Stout expressed that we could put something in the parkway at Wilson which was the beginning of the project. Mr. Lam, Community Development Oi,ector, stated we could propose some type of marker. 7, City Council Minutes 3 February 17, lion Page 10 y Councilwoman Wright accepted the suggestion that this should be referred to the Historical Preservation Commission, and to have this come back to Council at a later time. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to approve Item C12. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Discussion of Item CID. Approval to modify and approve the Conditions of Approval on an appeal of the Planning Commission Conditions relating to Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 87 -05 Cross and Crown Lutheran Chur,h confirming Council action of a hearing held February 3, 1988. (0701 -06 APPEAL) Councilwoman Wright stated she pulled this because she wanted to know if the public hearing was closed, and if anyone was allowed further Input. Mr. Markman responded that the public hearing was closed. The roofing material was referred to Development Review which they approved. r,unciiwoman Wright responded she had not heard that, and was glad that was so. MOTION: hived by Wright, sernnded by Buquet to approve Item CID. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. Discussion of Item C24. Approval of an Indenture between the Soutnern Pacific transportation Company (CO 88 -024) and the City for construction of City - maintained landscaped slopes within the Railroad's right -of -way, between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard northerly of Base Line Road - submitted by The William Lyon Company. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) Councilwoman Wright stated it was difficult to see on a map how large an area this was to be maintained. Russell Maguire. City Engineer, stated it was approximately 16 feet by 30 feet aide Councilwoman Wright stated she would like some clarification between this project and the one at 8th Street where staff had stated in order to work on the wall adjacent to the railroao would be dangerous to employees. She wanted to know what the difference was Mr Maguire responded the difference waa that on the Southern Pacific Railroad, there would be only ten trains a month, and thry were not high -speed trains. The developer has to improve this and make different ways for employees to get Into it. He could not answer the questions regarding policy ac to why this decision was made Y City Council Minutes Fehruary 17, 1988 Page 11 councilwoman Wright stated she felt this was acceptable, but she did not feel she had all the necessary information. MOTION: Moved by Buquet. seconded by Strut to approve Item C24. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Brown, Buquet. Stout, Wright NOES: None ABSENT: King Y f ! f ♦ f D. CONSENT ORDINANCES City Clerk Authelet read the titles of Crd:nance Nos. 335, 336, 338 and 339. ti y fe— Mential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) to General Industrial, ^ea 1, for 2 31 acres of land, located north of 8th and west of Baker ue - APN 207- 541 -60. ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION AS REQUESTED BY :1LWOMAN WRIGHT. (0203 -09 DO AMEN) ORDINANCE NO. 335 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 87 -10, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED NORTH OF 0TH STREET AND WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APN 207 - 541 -60 un Ur nN,a.nu VI RNUnbN - e request to amena the 1noustrial spreitic Plan to expand ubarea t�ecTude 2.31 acres of land generally locates north of 8th Street and west of Baker Avenue - APN 207- 541 -60. ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION AS REQUESTED BY COUNCILWOMAN WRIGHT. (0203 -05 SP AMEN) ORDINANCE NO. 336 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -03, REQUESTING AN ADDITION TO SUBAREA ONE LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET AND WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APN 207 - 541 -60 D2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 88 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Sect on 17.10.03OG2 of the Development Co e Y� City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 12 pertaining to parking lot and sidewalk sales. ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION AS RLQUE:TED BY COUNCILWOMAN WRIGHT. (0203 -03 OC AMEN) ORDINANCE NO. 338 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE rITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 17.10.03OG2 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO PARKING LOT AND SIDEWALK SALES GENERAL DYNAMICS - An amendment to the Access /Circulation Plan tor Ina n ustr a rea peclflc Plan (Subarea 10) to eliminate Cleveland Avenue, north of 7th Street - APN 209- 272 -02. (0203.05 SP AMEN) ORDINANCE NO. 339 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (I.S.P.f AMENDMENT 87 -04 REQUESTING THAT CLEVELAND AVENUE (NORTH OF 7TH STREET) BE DELETED FROM ThE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN nHU nunu r -uoy - ,ocace- oecw --n n1111R -n nr-11u- -nu 11-1-11 -Venue, ni connect on w t Amendment (87 -04) to the Access /Circulation Plan for the Industrial Area Specific Plan to eliminate Cleveland Avenue. (1110 -18 VACATE ST) RESOLUTION 110. 88 -070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE BETWEEN 7TH STREET AND THE A.T E S.F. RAILROAD Councilwoman Wright requested that Item's 01 and 02 be pulled for dis-ussion. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of the Ordinance No 335, 336, 338 and 339, and to approve the balance of the Consent Ordinances minus Item's D1 and D2. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Discussior of Item D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -10 - CITY OF RAWC—HFCUCAMONGA - A request to amen the eve opment District Nap from ow Density es ent al (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) to General Industrial, Subarea 1, for 2.31 acres of land, located north of 8th and west of Baker Avenue - APN 207- 541 -60. (0203 -09 OD AMEN) City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 13 ORDINANCE NO. 335 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF TIME CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAJMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 87 -10, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM LOW RESIDEN' IAL TO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET I'D WEST Gh BAKER AVENUE - APN 207 - 541 -60 un ur nnncnu wLwvnun - n request co ameno the ,nvuscria, apec,nc r,an w expand u area to nc ude 2.31 acres of land generally located north of 8th Street and west of Baker Avenue - APN 207- b41 -60. (0203 -05 SP AMEN) ORDINANCE 110. 336 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -03, REQUESTING AN ADDITION TO SUBAREA ONE LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET AND WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APH 207 - 541 -60 Councilwoman Wright stated she had pulled this Item because there were certain assurances made at the last hearing, and she wanted to make sure those things were going to be guaranteed. Hr Lam stated that these are done by deed restrictions which will be done separately. The City Council will see all of these things before anything happens to that property. Councilwoman Wright expressed she was hoping that both things would be happening at the same time, so if there was any problem with the deed we would not be stuck with the Industrial zoning. She asked If there was any possibility that this could be accomplished. Mr. Lam responded that we could If that's what Council wished. Mr. Buller elaborated it would take staff about a month to prepare this and before staff could do anything with that property, It would have to be approved by the City Council. Mr. Markman stated the only way we can be assured of this would be to put the restrictions in the grant deed. Since the City already owns the property, we can limit th, •ises through the transfer process regardless what is in the Specific Plan. If we app- - this now, it would be easier to market the property then we could explain the zone restrictions. If we leave It zoned this way, a Jeveloper may pass on the property. Councilwoman Wright expressed she felt satisfied that her concerns are being taken care of. City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 14 MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of Ordinance hos. 335 and 336, and to approve said Ordinances. Motion carried unanimously E -0. , 1 *,kf Discussion of Item D2. ENVIRONMENTAL _ASSESSMENT PAD DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT t Eve opment Coe perta n ng toparking lot and sidewalk sales. YY AMEN) ORDINANCE NO. 338 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 17.10.03OG2 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO PARKING LOT AND SIDEWALK SALES Courcilwoman Wright stated she had pulled this item because she felt the original Intention of this W35 because there was a specific problem. She felt this was overt, restrictive and the obtaining of a permit appeared also to be overly restri ve. Mr -,Ichard k,corrr, Community Code Representative Supervisor, stated that the numhe.• of sales and frequency of sales has not changed by this regulation. He state, the main focus of the original Ordinance was to assign an approval to a business location rather than to a business entity. As far as a temporary use permit requirement, that has not changed either. MOTION Moved by Buquet, seconded b) Brown to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 338 and approve said Ordinance. Nation carried unanimously 5 -0. •*..,. E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS E1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -048 - WEIRICK PROPER1iE5 - request to amen t e an Use Element of the enera tan from f ce tc Ne.ghborhood Commercial for 3.58 acres of land, located on the southwest corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue - APN 202 - 151 -33 (Continued vn i December 16, 1987) (0203 -03 GP AMEN) RESOLUTION NO. 87 -574 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, AMENDMENT NO. 87 -048 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM OFFICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FIR 3.58 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOMITA COURT 101D ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APN ?02- 151 -33 City Council Mjnutes February 17, 1988 Page 15 Tta - A requesc to amene cne ueveiupoenc uTSCncc s way Tr w -ur Professional) to "NC" (Neighborhood Commercial) for 3.02 +cres of land on the southwest corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue -APN 202 - (Continued from December 16, 1987) (0203 -09 DD AMEN) RESOLUTION NO. 87 -575 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 87 -03, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN TIME DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 3.58 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOMITA COURT AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APN 202- 151 -33 NOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to continue to June 1, 1988. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -11 - JAMES E. CARTER - request to amene the Deve opment 01str1cts Map from 0O fich e/Professional (OP) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) for apPrortmately 3.45 acres of land, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue - APN 208- 202 -13, 14. (Applicant has requested a continuance to March 16, 1988.) (0203 -09 DD AMEN) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP, ODA 87 -11, FROM OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR A 3.45 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE SOUTI "JEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKE FINnINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 208 -202- 13, 14 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN A1ENDMENT 88 -OIA - JAMES E. ARTE0. A request to amen the Genera an Land Use Map from f ca" to Neighborhood Commercial" for approximately 3.45 acres of land, located on the outhwest corner of Bace Line Road and Hellman Avenue - APN 2D8- 202 -13, 14. Applicant has requested a continuance to March 16, 1988.) (0203 -03 GP AMEN) RESOLUTION 40. 88 -093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP OF THE GENERAL PLAN, GPA 88 -0IA, FROM OFFICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 16 e •, FOR 3.45 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LIME ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AND � MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 208- 202 -13, 14. r S MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to continued to March 16. 1988 Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. o f a f a f 1 E3. APPEAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO TfiE UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM FOR CbCAMONGA VILLAGE CERTE - CONDITIONAL GiT�S -b�- R - e request to appea ann ng omm ss on s decision in denying the proposed amendment to the previously approved sign program for Cucamonga Village Shopping Center, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue. Staff report presented by Nancy Fang, Associate Planner. (0701 -06 APPEAL) Ms. Fong stated that the applicant had sent a letter to the City rescinding the j; following points: 1. 24 inch versus 30 inch letters: they were willing to reduce their letter height to 24 inches. 3. Additional verbiage on the signs: they were willing to remove the additional verbiage. 4. Neon bolt: they were willing to use a red neon internal illumination Instead of the exposed neon bolt 5. Sign placement at 22 feet in height: they we -e willing to lofer their sign to 20 feet from grade. t The only point they continued to appeal was the point number 2; red plex faces versus blue plex faces. They desired to have blue channel letter faces with a red plex bolt through their sign. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Ms. lenaa Marshall, representative from Berk Sign Company, and representing The Warehouse. She stated that the color was the most important thing to The Warehouse at this time. There being no further public input, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to grnnt the appeal to allow the blue channel letter face sign with a red plex bolt Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. * * * f f f E4. APPEAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TE4TATIVE TRACT 13579 - AYOUB - An appeal of the Planning Comm ss on s ec Sion deny ng the rl— evel�{men�T units on .69 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -:4 dwelling units per 9 City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 17 acre), located •i the east side of Hellman Avenue, 325 feet north of 19th Street - APN 201- 474 -12. Staff report was presented by Debra Meier, Associate Planner. (0701 -06 APPEAL) Ilayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Peter Lynch representing applicant /owner of this property. Jake Jecmedsen presented renderings of the project. Frank Ake, Architect. Nancy Hanwright, 6630 Sugar Pine Place, stated she would love to have buildings on that place, but she felt this was too many people In such a small area and objected to this. There being no further public input, Maycr Stout closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Wright expressed she had been opposed to this project from the very beginning, and that the devzloper has not mitigated the concerns. She further stated she had received many calls, and she felt that this was not the right development for that place. Councilman Buquet stated we were looking at three - quarters of an acre with nine units and felt that was too intense for that area. Councilwoman Brown stated she concurred with both Councilwoman Wright and Councilman Buquet and also had concerns regarding the ingress and egress. Also, there was no parklnq for visitors except on Hellman. Staff stated that the project allowed for three guest parking spaces for the entira project. Mayor Stout stated that it was extremely difficult to come up with something that vould be acceptable, but he felt the Planning Commission was right in their decision or. this ite.,. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to deny the appeal and reaffirm the Planning Commission findings summarized as follows: 1 The Planning Commission determined that the density of the site as proposed was not compatible to adjacent properties. 2 The proposed project does not provide a gradual transition from one land use to another, but instead proposes a sharp contrast. The Hellman Avenue neighborhood character is that of low profile, single family residences. The proposed project does not relate the mass and scale of the building proportionately to the site size, street set- back, and open space. A landscaped open space on the project site is basically limited to the front set -back and the rear 20 feet of the site. 3 The architectural character of the proposed project does not promote City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page IS j the Planning Commission's expe:tations of superior quality based on the design guidelines, and development standards of the Development i' Code and General Plan. 4. The ultimate density allowed within any residential density range S shalt be determined through the development review process and public hearings. The Planning Commission determined that this project did i.ot provide the proper transition between land use districts nor compatibility with adjacent residential development. wNation carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Stout called a recess at 8:50 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:00 p.m. •,, All members of Council were present. e • .. • a E5. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNEFTION WITH: Staff report presented by Mr. Wasserman, City Manager. Mr. Wasserman stated that this was basically an uninhabited area. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. A. ANNEXATION RD. 13 FOR OR 87 -05 AND CUP 87 -07 (INDUSTRIAL /COMIERCIAL ANA) TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISIRICT NO. B. NO. 88 -090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION Y.TH ANNEXATION 110. 13 TO LANDSCAPE HAINTENANCC DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 87 -05 AND CUP 87 -07 RESOLUTION NO. 80 -095 A RESOLUTION OF Th: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK iN CONNECTION WIT;i ANNEXATION 80. 9 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THC FINAL ENGINEER'S . .. , City Council Minutes ` February 17, 1S88 Page 19 REPORT FOR DR 87 -05 AND CUP 87 -07 RESOLUTION 110. 88-091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF -HE CITY OF RANCHO CULIMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WIRK IN COANECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 36 TO STREET LIGHTING AAINTEHAMCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FUJAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 87 -05 AND CUP 87 -07 MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Brown, to approve Re;olution Nos. 88 -094, 88-095, and 88 -695. Motion Carried by the following vote: AYES Brown, Stout, King, Wright HOES: None ABSENT: Buquet F. PUBLIC HEARINGS F1 LONSIOFRATION OF ESTABLISHMENT Oi A SPEED LIMIT - Recomsendatior. to eS Laol s a M H an a MPH Speed 1 wit On HermOSa Y "nU- between dase Line Road and Sun Valley Drive, a 40 MPH speed limit on Ninth Stir ^t between Baker Avenue and Archibald Avenue and a 50 MPN spied limit on Rochester Avenue becweer. Foothill Boulevard aM Base Line Road. Staff report presented by Paul Rougeau, Sr Civil Engineer. (1141 -10 SPEED LIMIT) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Mike Groessel, a resident of the Woods area, expressed concern about tPe safety of the children in the area He felt the speed limit should be nwered to 35 mph because of the school in the srea, ridth of the road, flooding pruble!:s, and the percentage of cars that traveled the road. He stated there was no place for the children W walk. especially north and sr,uth of the .hoot area, wail the street is widened out. There being no further public convents. Mi -or Stout ,.tosed the public hearing. Councilwoman Wright asked if the courts allowed any other, kind of traffic control other than radar. Mr. Rougeau responded the courts wanted speed limits set according to state law, not arbitrarily The courts will rot allow -adar on speeds that are set arbitrarily u i City Crunctl Minutes February 17, 13M Page 20 City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance Ho. 340. ORDINANCE N0. 340 (first reading) Al ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN STREETS 4 M0710N: !Loved by King, seconded by Buque4 to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 340, and set second reading for March 2, 1986. Motion carried by the following .otc.: At ES: Browr, Buquet, Stout, King NOES: Wright ABSENT: None Councilwor,n Wright expressed she felt we should lower the speed limit on the lower end of Hermcsa and felt we should be doing things more like the City of Up'.and was doing. a + + + a + F2 CONSIDERATION OF A MODIFICATION TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 70 INCREASING PENALTIES AND ADD NG 0 - An ord nance ofof tee City Council of the C ty o Ranrha Cucamonga amending Section 2.24.210 of. and adding a new Section 2.24 220 to, Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, thereby increasing criminal penalties and adding civil remedies. Staff report presented by Paula Pachon, Community Services Administrative Assistant. (1402 -06 HISTORY) Councilman K;ng asked what was civil ,emedy for enforcement? Mr Msrtman, City Attorney, responded that we would have the ability with this section should someone start tc knock dawn some historical buildings, we could stop them and actually get some type of civil remedy. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public h,.aring. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 70 -F. ORDINANCE NO. 104 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.24.210 OF. AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 2.24.220 TO, LHAPTER 2.24 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, TBEREDY INCREASING CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND ADDING City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 21 CIVIL REMEDIES Councilman King stated that he had some concerns regarding needs and ton much intrusion on an Individuals private rights. He had yet to make up his mind but would do so in the neat tar weeks. MOTION: Moved by Wright .acended f Grown to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 70 -F, and to set second reading fog March 2, 1988. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 1 f t 1 f G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPCRTS G1 SIGN ORDIIIAHCE - Review of changes proposed by Chamber of Commarce. Staff report presented by Dan Coleman, Sr. Planner. (0807 -02 SIGN) Mayo- Stout opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing Council were: Jo'n Mannerino, representing the Chamber of Coamerce, stated the Chamber's desire was to work for an Ordinance that would make code enforcement easier through voluntary compliance, and they hsd two recommendations as follows: 1. Neon signs - to allow a tasteful neon signs. 2. window signs - eliminate temporary signs and replace with a class called display signs. Lowell Games. President of the Chamber, stated that on a survey they found 9?% of the small businesses were In violations of the Sign Ordinance. He hoped Council would consider their recommendations, and they would be willing work with Cow.cil on this. Mike Mitchell, local businessman, stated the Sign Ordinance required that the temporary window signs get a permit. He felt that It would take mora manpower to enforce, and that we should get out of the permit process. Gary Stobbe stated he had been contacted by the State to come np with a safe sign. He stated they have a window sign which is shock proof, fire proof, etc. After further discussion and directing questions to Mr. Bob Thomas, Chairman of the Task Force, Mayor Stout stated he felt he needed some time to study this. Some of the things suggested have merit, but he was not sure he liked the Chamber's conclusion Councilman Buquet stated that even from the beginning Council stated they would always be open for modl'ications to the Sign Ordinance. He had some reservations about neon signs. He felt thht perhaps we could put the neon sign City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 22 under a design review process. Councilwoman Wright agreed, she needed to be educated on what things are. She was not against neon, but felt it could be controlled. Councilman King agreed with Councilman Buquet about neon signs. He felt we should focus on all different land uses with appropriate methods and types of signs which are allowed. For example, something on Foothill would be more appropriate than a particular type of sign on Haven. Councilwoman Brown felt that a Sign Ordinance should not be a blanket type Ordinance, but certain things allowed in certain areas. She stated she would have to be shown where allowing neon would improve th's City, and she also agreed she needed tv have further study on this. Mr. Buller, City Planner, recommended that this be put on the next City Council Agenda so Council could further address these issues. Mayor Stout stated he would like to make It in four weeks. ACTION: For staff to bring the item back in four weeks, and for Mr. Buller to summarize what Council has already stated. Once direction is received from Council, then it will be forwarded on to the Planning Commission. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by King to continue the Item to March 16, 1988 City Council Agenda. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. + « a . + « G2. MID -YEAR REV:EW OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997 -88. Staff report presented y Russell Maguire, City ng neer. 0 -00 CI MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by King to approve the report Including the additional protects and funding sources. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Councilwoman Wright stated she did not approve cf voting for expenditures that are included in a general report. She felt that if we are to approve expenditures, then it should be done separately not included in an update report. G3. G4. REVIE6 OF PUBLIr, SAFETY COMMISSION REPORT ON FIRE SERVICE FEASIBILITY STUDY City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 23 PSC 88-01), Staff report presented by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. (1302- 00 FIR 01ST After some discussion by Council, Mr. Wasserman stated staff will report back at the next meeting with an outline of the next steps in the procedure. ACTION: Council received and filed the report and requested the item to be brought back with an outline of the course of action for consideration at the March 16, 1968 City Council meeting. G5. MINIMUM UNIT SIZE FOR MULTI- FAMILY DWELLINGS - A request by the Planning Commission to clarify City Council direction as to potential modifications of the minimum dwelling unit requirements for multi- family dwellings. Staff report presented by Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner. (0203 -04 HOUSING) Councilman Buquet expressed that the perception for multi - family units today we-e too small. He felt the market Was appropriate now for larger minimum unit sizes. Councilwoman Wright expressed that there was a need for some smaller units, but she felt there had been an over - concentration in the small units. She felt some type of limit should be put on the ratio. Also, when this comes back, she would like to see a study of what this is today with a proposal to improve this. Mr. Kroutil asked If Council still wanted staff to do a study relating unit sizes to density. He said staff has looked at this, but did not see the connection. Councilman King stated he was to favor of increasing the living spice, but to the extent you increase the living space cnd keep the densities the same then you decrease th, open space. So when you approach the issue of living space, you need to approach this with the concept of open space and density. Basically all three are interrelated so you could get or. appropriate fit. Mayor Stout stated we had open space requirements so eventually if they can not make it fit, they have to have less units. Councilman Buquet stated he would be interested In knowing, over the last four years, the number of average size multi- family units that have been constructed to the small range ACTION: The above coaments were directions given for the Planning Commission. Ii. COUNCIL BUSINESS I V City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 24 V• MI,Y(10. %., v,j,j .tan repurt presenteu oy raura racnon, cumnamty services MU strative Assistant. (0100 -00 ADMIN) ?'- ACTION: Councilwoman Wright was designated to work with the staff on the 150th Anniversary. f t k i t t H2. DISCUSSION REGARDING DISASTER PREPAREDNESS. (Brown) Report presented by Councilwoman Brown. (6201-DO DISASTER) 1, ACTION: The Disaster Preparedness, will in the future, be responsible directly to City Council. Councilwoman Brown and Wright were appointed Sub- Co.noittee to work In this area. ACTION: Item was continued to March ., 1988 City Council agenda. H4 DISCUSSION OF TELEPHONE SITUATION IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA. (Buquet) (1200 -00 P UTILITY Mr. Hal Overton, from General Telephone Company, was presp.,t to answer Council's concerns and questions. ACTION: Staff to bring back a proposal for consideration at the March 2, 1988 City Council meeting. ttt.tt H5 CONSIDERATION OF A MISSION STATEMENT FOR TIIe HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMAS ION. grown (1402-06 HI R' ACTION: Refer the item to the Historical Preservation Commission for their consideration H6. UPDATE ON ETIWANDA FLOOD CONTROL STUDY. (King) Staff report presented by Russell Maguire, City Eng Geer. 1 7 -O8 FLOGD CONT J City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 25 Mr. Maguire stated that there will be a report completed about May, and in June will be reviewed by the development community. H7 repur,, pvcaemeu vy ureu ou IIV, e,y r,auner. ,vevc -mac wr, Mr. Buller stitEd that the item will be going to the Planning Commission at their next meeting and will be before City Council after that. MS. VERBAL UPDATE Ott PARKING SITUATION AT KLUSHAA AND FOOTHILL. (Mrtoh ) Staff report presente y Brad Buller, City Planner, an Russell Maguire; City Engineer. (1163 -tl1 PK b TRAF) ACTION: The report was received and filed. I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING i There were none. J. COMMUNICATIONS FPOM THE PUBLIC There were none. K. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to adjourn to an executive session to discuss pending litigation. Motion carried unanimously 5.0. Meeting adjourned at 12:00 Midnight. Respectfully submitted Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk Approved: 0 r 1 p OOnN OPOa..N OFOO� ^O ^OJM1rPOON0000° FV •� IJ N °OtiP O ^NNaO p..J CCENNFOaaf a00NV0000P^ P .02. fdnPyny°a f ryN= PM1rnaNO dYarF r � O ONJ nPf ryhS� n POn ry..a .1 i e n a a nnM1aar «rr ^nor orry .. V Q n it i `jd Q; FFC iaJnOPOMN nfaaFnPOFNnlNJF°PprN n•INaFOP p rlf aaaa$ aVFFM1FhhFFFhO0aO0aY0YaPPPPPPPPPP < QI Nii iw aii wr w��.aiiw aiaiw�.ai.Qi�wi��.Viw.an �.aiai�w.aiai a+ai° `jl nNryn N�.ry NNNnnnrvrynNnNNNNNNNryNnryNNNNM1nnN NIrVN U 1 1 N i WMWY \CW Wf t L i N l�i� � Z nW j OrWWWWWW �r ui z-- zua z zs--iz zzW 2zz z z apY ° ^oev azn W G. o ryec0000r =off o Ui V VUU VUP.1. p.�' Up Yi uu.www. YF Y EV 1 O YW �J N Vw I(V -6 h - Q �O sWO` V33 <QW W 'Na�212 r L N >3 NrNN t w Wu�WUVn > Y it ° a.enJ JV r rii sJ4p z >� 0 0�"«J oW {:N Nw «� urM1W� iQ pn e ilpN <a�wWYW \ <_ Q� O +`Y 4 LLV6 ry1N.`I f IN wOZVJlLWrNrs puC �pM1J L60at N\\ W`�U«ZWW pn.+ :3Q RuV1�W.�Y. O; ry ry NryNN Y^ WaiYyLy 6= O!WQJ °{Z{OL2-122 OW.tW \N6.Fi. 1 W W wNU Q NN .O6J66QWNI�Y�L.�1 Yp Ze L�.\'. -� << t rl� QOWWOnN W E p N ^FUp p { p 3daII s N3 > U42JNtWNWOif� iJ« p « {tp. sEEYii < °Q.pl YFiQ Y V VVJV Ul � .{rrrLLLt6NiUZrjV VerFZjLZT u ,� ^ W i •z• N u . p Cu s.Wa Y i v Y .1 < .WV ° zu °1i wig °t •ZOJ aQ+ > - jo.`na N 6JU« 9 NY � Z� 6NM 8< N C a y <Y VF <90 Ny^ WyjWO {E n. n� f - M UiW LJ Ywui.. > <N <fJ <.YlY .ZiwiN 1 : pWU uzN =w.}Ila'�NUi »i > «il �'" .Q.riNN W ^ t < h ^,J 06iJ ^Ww {W�WWWWO L <'JW j J 6 / � YWJ pQ uu Q J°pN SQ ^N h z eWJ pLN>o` Wa LLLLL <OW ..- h ^ -I -QW YI <- C o z+ ds+uKW Le E Ja .l.W Y i u pN 'JN r ^ .°O i. O J NLiOY Q U<V<�.h�QQQ Qa p Q«F �FY U .iy iyy<11 iVCO�J N U ph 16E J Jii-w63 `W Wi � 0 44 �w N V .0 °p W e` u Qo o.°/ < {a {siiii5i °:�"�°`aanaaie'r uu�iuuu n <1 N ^ OYNM1 Nr^�Nf= PNNNOf <arnnnnP nfOnOenpa ^ it n Oan + `PnNPN NO ^nnnrFNPQY 1= r =VMe Nf Mr f �P OS P M ^NFrPrP l �SY�S����•�r��S�NY1aYV••yNOl a•V.JeMMMONODO� }V yyr R y)GTTy � y�yw i yCY}rll�yyr ^A Y�RP �•rAN.O /'pzO `TbNOf M"2 PP rP) yTy�T NO • is n�°!b -•i• n zx� )Rn ^TT = ) hR A 2 _ M ss � 99 I Y i S i �� :NST^ r'•'STPrm RTai fJ MloFyye M a x m W)Nx z 1 ARYI I'I +s2�RN N•R f1p (f bl'1f9R ff ^ RRT RryR�Y RI'IT RR •y yyOw ^+'LCS�OwN�y p- 1 OOO• C Obf bOb yr OObby S�TnyTVA)NpPP O ONPPP 9 PP AP)Sm ADPPP OPPAaL y uuw0 >NUNT u O 11y1N y uu uN -- -YNU- y <>ywx yw y yNy � rxwyTNMHT M wT3e � „N NYV M�SS�i � f1 M SNNN 7 N N NNN On Ny�NNNNMNNNN= NNNNN�NN 4NN�MM`NMN�N 4.N.pp yN.p Y =yy 4NM NuYYUUyVVVVy, aN NItl.INaaNN wltl..�.a•�r�rrM000000000a Otlq•1P NyYNrOSOVPN }WNrOtlgVPM }VNyOaOVPN }WNYS } N•' O P nnNVNr lJdN.....I�N ..�yyOPNMPV4JPNJJy }MrOgONYOJIO �N gPNyN.}Ip OVrlurNOgPtlNPrNbb S/'a0 }MOgOgNNMJ OyOIOPPNNNONaNNgO}yy y�'pN�.ONrOr }ONOyN }qr 00`.NyO rOONOf }gNgOq /.OMOS000NbNyNgNONOrPMNq .I 11_ p IQ %t" • Y' 2. < V T b T N • i� is F R Y C O a L > T A > p T. N 4 •1 ^ OI-^ 00000JpOnOOY .Oj$OOnpn�M1O$On•PrOYOPg00 +P n C' �'�^ ^nw0••P .•N.pp rnaPp ^n01- <PNaaPwO • apMON00 <� aM1 ^^ Oa0Y00 N.•aPnnanN r•� nOf O$VPF O.•.. •-MN LL � OPNM1Pn•YNnM V-• $ Pn 11 ONNh a 1 .. ^a py N n N •• M L N •. Si u< s 1 JN anYPONNnVNaM 0P0 ^ry•'If NanOp O••N Of p.dhOPS ° `al ^PPw�.PiPw +.Piw �wi� ^P p.Pi.P•wPiw�w.Pi .P•.Pi i•Pipi �.Piw ��•P > }x NNryNNNhNnryNNNNN1NNNryNnNNryNNN •VNNNryNNNryNNryN 4 1 NENN RO O L ZwLL�L2 ^LP C Nf.' •S 1 W>WWWWW^Wf F WVW j j � •NWi N r .•.'o .Na N•^i•ON •Ni ni � .^Wi W 'W -.^Wi A W N y Q< i Q .•P. orQ°iQ asaaWQF N aN o .z.Q Q .Q'•Im1 U� i = ^ ^•. •^ ^F a �P On � ^SWQ 1 On OSO0000 .OW O Y O OpOOZw 1 YV'^ OI- yYYyYYyW+Yw � �n Y w Pn CY y�Y�V< 1 Zug ;Oj2 � Z •-tYw NP N '� FWJ W Q+°i6 .},1 LJ O�Wtl�n`y W U J Zw QrU N yyJN °Z 1 sQ • .. OQrP6 O O•• • •1 C' NQ„ OP '-OtY MS CAN �L 1 _ -a-at P - < -W yYLL S9W O - O "•UZINW � SW „jam O ^0 •>i> 81 }W JfNtiV Y•. W i LLaN i1�N�y ^ +o �.� ..o autzW; x x 6Zw H<_•.OVC 8 Z6 y0 N•• tW•$ IOhZION 6LL ;W QI BOO •LL[OtlNJUA N6pQ pp<11 O•'Oyy Q OF"'OYOLL uSi w pi y� •6llC <�'•UQtiNOLLSOMV1YitWULiuI~ O ^OS >0�60 < }S\f wFS�Y Wy�NaV < Y; Oi <V ^� M N p <4 ^Y'20 < <Y�"•`n6N ^L^ 00•S• }NaJV �e�a- n•�000i3$zin4�sc'oib�o"aiu u�aa�iui�i�s aS.z••'d' i � 8 Q Ni-WuO L s u - Qa ^� 7 W - '” ; u .n w< N .. o 5;75 .N W •� Con �aStl�N Q s wx W.t s o s W N� o� a«��W i ! oQYYO YWN :aw�N Wy auY °� oN a� >O o i sasYv rJo yy �.�.�paN4'n >YI rO•4.i Q °�uw+o `jai °1�'"a N�•.Q� S�SOQ$ 0; 6V iN±JV J JN ° � �a'ui: `uo aoNtl <3LL u ja -•SiW Wei ° 3» rn3o»i.^• z znu < zjo oNQwrwwWlW �sQ^ r o iW�u - W uW i� }o ^4WOO ;.•ow N i aizi re.l°W��u zg�urN ^xa wLLFwowW :uj J 06 jMO= 6 <ONY^ < W OV oy3 oYu ^Yuou LLl..i1'�i°euauWNU ov }A; ooj�8o z; o W s .i < NNN^^Ppa'nao ^anew n.•o Nn ^PNn w'P'NNn ^NNNY�u •.1 °1 a�$ N ..�`•$wp.P.�M1.°.n$faa..°.e�n.°I •n.$n�a,"o•NfvtiMP'O $.P.$N8 3 I jPOMJJPy T�OoNP�V�YV yIWWN _,� F �yyNyayN r"IJPJN V••i yMMbV••OP ; K' V F NT7 �w2< €yNMMNMNNNNaM NT a 1 ^, Y •„IR" }• aYy+°nCCOppooM >Y 1 m T Tf ar «Itl arwNaOYCeCCCy Sn^ 1 1 °Tryriwr• n awy +-+ - ,rl i+,."�.66 +r �i °o.T.'�rm"IZll lfi.,��17��1''�a+a,'•.'. haw aT TNaVw' .~i "Tir' -�� �ntr «ry:s�ssi na e � NZ - °n•.zn Y Yb rw w wwaeN>c i L qF TTTTmT I ss;sse j � NYa n ay+{VJ a «r« 1 Cas emn R,'-mg eo yTJySR4AoI1� ..Kxl ar11v +wa} pessyy 4CU rYT�r ^•S•aim I(m� 25- M�N «aSIrJ w) gi IS TV'YYYYY a.Y.//�y r ~rMT=f1 i T�i iTil � -:TNT 1 M °Oby eYTN lia. °+ to z Mna•• 1 onn« nn. �mn nynnnnnwann I g io°n =.C.;; I to yTyyeOOP �° tt ATO,. 9IZ+faa,a+ ^G,a.,XIZ..i,Tdbb F„g F aaN aaym a niaaasa aw I ^ rTHi :yrS y T-- lrl -l'T MU R.... MN48N44NNNM4MNMN4NNNNNM4 p P �WN•••.... VlYY�OiayPbbbb O I:MJYN l a I } a NWJ iy I " °s � y M =N PNP $NwN! MJ,b�,P YYwIP ~M 1� pfyfP O ••JINMyyJNPOPMyOMPNby N••O ••V ; y J y .'O.•J•o+'o Nd$ie °o ow °c °o:Saa °a •°10 ii aM O+ J 1 0 • i mN call ° oar°- °og°•a.N• °O +i•I°- oo °oaa•°. °o a.°.o °oo < °oo on °o r oom rnO a•pOOn..PmYaO ^nPRpr JY n 1•a ^VOONrYOr 41 M1 „ OManPnmNNV ^rr. N•ON r my wVNrnmaN o n ^ m r < 6 I f v n r N w n 6 tl f ll 3 ' •i ooao�Nnf mar- oPO ^NnanaWmpo ^NnrNapopo ^NnrNa O Q pp ^^ rr r Nn NNNNnnnnnnnn nnn aaaYVVv ` 1 iOe0000J000000000pOOUOVO00 °00000000ROR00 1 NNNnNM1NM1ry•N'•.NYN rynN NIVN NnMNNNNNNNNN NNINVNnIVNNnN V 1 1 O > Q N z itrQ "EU un . ai Ej °P- ---.°. J i i20 •°« E ^z :zri iN. .a. it oN: "rQ -emizn sl:z i O3 > Ji04�Y� Viw2m O• .'. EYf nFV.0.0'.0 W I i4 Wj _ �LO•S.N YO N Vw «U NQ Y ^° Y «W« YN nQtNJ M�YU`I.IY I V S Z6 JQ 6<4 \26u1. Z J S K W UJVW J J 1 Q >nV 00< 4 O Y M 2' •fil uEi 'J3Z •nu. WC i3 :J•Nr <J 'Qt W to ;L. ° Wd i2 <WW <.. A-4 mu mwm zW ...FN o u sm YYNOM a ^44wwNa ° EoWaW s ¢mWWU ONwzmWOmait Q� •� N >z o ng .o is o ° i N�aWWUOOW W.o NI .• w¢ J} N 1 nOt n0 >NVW600NEWY W OVp V QS ZSZFCS4 <SJEaOG r NJMJUSW4JOf Cl<-. Oi O VOO mY SS�uO�W06� <LrVY iLViJ i ° >Nw�P� \u°i >1 Z VWW t46N�N SYm M m N4N60!• QE FQQMY ^s« <OJrt f V U�.^ OWn 9u.•PW« W ¢u p¢O <L 6Q �4 FF6fWN W ZOWW 2 •' �N ¢S. �W w JW>W Frmi�M «W .... <wwu S.• V Ow..Wi E TLW )WQI W6WQJO�NV >6JNY¢< r uouo�WW >_••F <Ww �< <4WyW ae «a <uoQ uNZQCO� i >aN Lu�w�¢¢som>oQ ml- s>umf>w� � V S wL •• S L O 40 Y_ OQ } 4 O • 'Jt .. z< VS > 6 t 61j tV SO U J O 4 Sw ZZ ON O V � i i ii i � Yau ie orri °c z ^W <) �oNUWE o �i zL uuyyQ uJ wz pL4 VN��SttWO V J« 3J t�+ <n O.Z. V_ 6 < V N Q.E•Y VN �4WYSOV �V11aV V> OWmr. W iJZWVVOVp>W`W� >Q.� W.0 ¢ZO Uw44 J O O .t• N I. SUWW6 <J�6_O•°i•ON {Lt < ^N6 <SmN V2•JS E•<"S •J >N.<.w w<Y JViWOQOQ2 4f yC�W2�YOf mJ9 aY<iwWO6 E jppju <Wwr( to uW ..- r <WOns iw wV.4.• 4N WUEDF<wW¢Mt�2Lw¢ZW�06� <YiwIS6RZ m WI1 � .ZI. wU 4f< 4a<4 «�fimOmmmOfncVO�OYVVVCS�VUV P fl yy!! YPfnpNm rfaaOnwnpM1NaahYr I•mY00nfw I• , I a OYZ ^maM11•rNn•nNN NVNYnN Y1•nm am Mf NOnNmnl•N I w .. Naa =P ^I••aiwm 70.0 .°i�wi•ait ^tnP .. ^YYP i 1 �PPPdPrrp�PPPPfrP rPYrPrpAPMdyyPPOPrP Py NyYPNJV�PJPiVwHMlM IYiO pHVN UH N.+OWyYP6dryY�nO1MdY n4yryyMN'i' ynPOnwwwTyyw nwsTyTT00000y00 nn0 OnI^ >OOOiyD»if�TMOt wO Z°.yDTlnnw�NN2�i ^YC(y�D �^f � PLYOfi 4 niiT((nyVi'i0 > y >T T D°L T�np YYi''Cii HRY awi � MW " y ^ry siT aU »wo nP•iin gr w ..+.. DzL rT °(1 Das a sn iy_ Ti ynn (�VI Lwy nG_nO_O _ T N L p >YT DOy G N n PS yT0 Y• i f inn n � Mi N ^G S yP ST i y yN Nyy NNyM N yN IN�yN NNNNyM yN NwN/NNNN pN yNN ypN�yN NypN yp.ypNppNNNwC.wC/. pp.NNN O OOOOpOOOpO000V040 $PP PPOPPPP VN MMYMNM mw JPM }�N�OdP yPMJYNrOdPyPMJYNrOdOyPPJVNrOdOy s J r1uMOPOUrrYPi yYJiy r�PNPPyYJNPyPrry ViPiy °N�1r PMrOYVrPydMpPyPrJpMYrPfyNOPPNO pNMN dNP00p0 ppdPNN N020SPft PM0000P JOyVONP000000 °OOFrPOy °Pjwo 11 1 It d �T 1 IT i! Q 4 i o � L a L a n z 0 Q � n °ra Y E D > 4 T i N 4 J 1 Y• .L L F +o +Y °pon °o•°,. °o�+°•guga• °o °o moo ±� °Dora °p nn•N. iw $::R.K:.°1 •°• °o .r.• ?oo n i.iworon•>ar +goono n.eo nnr «Naar »aearNr „ooarro i naa ^,ovmwnr^,N Oe NnnNnn ^�Jwn +r,a^ nar�� » +ao& .1 i a i n .. ^o •• ^ r •„ .w.n s a, 2, i 3 � orornn+Nar o• >ownn +Mal- eoornn +Na^erornn +N arse O 1 ee pPPTPP 00000000000 °rw ^wwrw.•ww ««NN »,.NnN 2J n ooiiR RR•o,..°,.00 °........ r...•.... w .... ..........rJ..w................ ai � „nR a i, nn, Rnnnnnrv« „nn «nnn «n « „ « » „ « «nnnnn « « « «nnnNnn TL; W =__ ¢< � =ro i ¢ ru gip. ¢ ¢uu ¢w¢� n ¢ °�i W.¢••.¢.• i =ice ° z Vic, ni nz ioo iWiw 'rc .rxsz ,•$ o„ on p`ggtip etih a$o 2 � o ooa '`N .uzE o. ur< -.e.ua �W6su u¢s uauo uu..i uu.�.u..0 uu I JWW J� N<WY liz =bR' 9' 1 .ZWULLr ^Ye w anwON1WW ^N 2f• �js • • u -99:,55 NNV_LIUU V.- ` rW ^•'•b YWN61N° ,p MNN ,<•< 1 e V •• 4 � < YY f OQ< O¢M OWJ NrWWUe� On N �e 1 u �JYQy )26 N.V• YWL K6r - JV O NO � ,� apo4�QOPZ�ooz, zW � u4 <W F u, '��i•<••�NW zN� >iur• uprJU U.• �iON <o� w o p 30 :MLLE <NN�¢xW v4 T .� > NI C. < lY ¢> pN2 Y_xOw_<_Y�aWFW Ya Oi � <K 2•°••iNS<���u¢i4f �w< <WUyi00_. O•ii�, <W L <r O WI fiVJWYCNLeWV� O�M� WFF�MY TJ T T¢t 1•m 2 <rnF6 F Nr ,T` « J{5146{ puWY�rW.W, =• rW1 -W.• <LWWW21•Y61 <6•• >1y N•• O YY.••4x {Y••r•WI{•LJW {LL6 {.'¢JSf =6 1 y�4 C•w+Ot>p�aNN`Y6NO2 >MN 2.•W ¢SW <N66WFWri� 01.OW 10 WF< J <O « {<SK 'f W>WW >WtW 9jj tOK JOVp4LZ4NM°r..J peLNGeeLN. CUOp2641•pi�LVt � U 1 � JV = • r _ SN Y Vr< erT WU O U Mr.• �iY ON< Ix"'.2'•J 6N O a O WIC •O.• O JVLL uti �-1 Y U WNN vw =r_ WW__ N .Y• Fhb = < UeNp 6 jU 4 Yi; T r 4 .j { r 3 rN i NZUif s J • a z4T 4 W .�ZJ< .na5� V�00MiNJ JW 4OcMrJ6(i Cu NN < 6 ; i= Wzr 1 � N744 a GCF 701,Y M.N61'� iWrF L4 V \iP6 YN% L6 ,2• 2aSJ� :N JO.. gg GyyVWC Ns3 J :<4 4nau� yi J< +ua iz ¢i b N Duo-,- 1 T.Yn W 6pW SJ\iJUJ� OOWON 4 ` ¢�p ¢ 6F Np QiJWJ~'-. JYLS.:W <WL. N^CW •^ �.O•[SIWMF ^W•-. Ord p.•f. Y4Y: W� P a:. WOE' r Ti nNr»rrra aoneJOanNNerNUe wraN -•n rT••re.o nNar as mnr.Jnrwnn rl.Yrao +norawon ^- •roanar e°w..e^raan n , rvw�nnnnM .°. ¢na�nan ^rMOne mo.m n^ ^� +n wr�oa co I' r •+' O�OPrpYNldVrJVVpPPIrP YP IpVPVPNrYPP I dYVryueNpd Vf I.NNPJJNr.rf YNV„YYYrVYJJPiO_1 , II YPVYYP MNrVONP4VrVJp jf � n%, L »LLRVO<_n ' /j YYNN6 >NMAN TNDY4NMa� IKrr ` 2>Y >OT..r mD YY°ORrVY� y m IT O }I• > %MrZONYy !>N �j ;01 • mpKi. yY mrY » y >m'�' �r'y ilrl Z_RRGY1 SQL 1 y O• _OOSt l%1 rLsN�n4 »S2�°i.00 ' >i OrFRO» N pRrmTn /Y���1 !(i�1� j A V 9 M�TM1 nr�T M.n %>jY•'IOO »jN Ty2 >iRY>pc^gpp ' ; Du''�n >pA I ) rCip» j �lT•CiY^ aIIwriTNf Ar>•22``Oa� Y r A K,,, T nnmwT.y OrSiy � CR,.022 1 >KK�H i o n r iN 4Q I » o j wnpYp ;ggN »w�Y y wisTYal�M�mrnea: �T >T� N3mo j A >a iy wy m.°. irrw'�Ay z^uwryinz °yM^n>sT<a z2n; "'Yw K %»T�F� CYtnrnmr ^^�wT» 1 KTpwe ^pz'° +T ..z as jK a r .°1 ^ *ymv »r••R.ae� >�N g Ki y1',n�T?:i�iyr ->mv �x�wi ^T.laiioslfwonTRy Ty�YC >NT DA YT ' ay w jz TLa »erma ay «^ j^ ^'"sa �ymya 1 plr Prey _swm r�. znN y 1 oNwTy w jn mNY <�yIKIeT MY \P D r ,^.r� TTCfI> >ni'wRRYTN Tie 1 OR � y °^ � Rzr j «vT Nv nIZin nniy T^^n ^ e:e n a i w�- °i� °O� T p p TTTNn n ns'�Ii r yy ^ TTJ Orn C m 4 yyy »yV ., N mV ^KND A p l y N S pOw rriiM � M pY . p? n N pN M Y z ' NYUN 4I.•N ° N«yy NNNNyNNNNNNNNNNNyYNyNNNNNNNN 1 �PPO MNVOP NpV!!J!/. YrOVeYpNiyN„OdOYPVIyNrOieYP ).J J. J.wV VVYVWV4YYN A 10 MJ.y YrOd n= ONP «MrNPN r- -Or -YY v PV4NNOO f V jA N,Y. �y ±JN YI.O 00 OfdYepu ^'MV pO j V d000rONWO00N:pypVp �'YpM NNiO Iy M Nu00pVO00V f »�fpyyNOdr"ppO ONOYOdOyOO +NOSp ONp0000 j• i it .copy:__ -,._ _w Y'. I.YIr.r Yw.KYr.Ir r�Ia..,1. AIflK11Ip11 !oA Sio011o1>< fMAGf Ntil/tf/ 1. t]nO> d IY'Y6gf1 Ml afD. , ,. >m- I.n.c+cwNn� rrd].. •4. at:.ul, vr. M.rrw. iAtti f1AC{ OOw Mt! 1 ruWpa d AFlICyOp; t f.frco, ilc. Ari.t.dwfwf.Mf p Iladno.. r.....» G .aHt GIG. A.Iq 1 Il1fW d IuMKTOa[q � flfJ.00 in ti A. fewV R ]4 A) a4 4 A M .lalar w Mar w M.. r V .aalwA u,r J M .wl,l� d M AIS.J. 4wr]a Caw.l A0. IL RAM d CNIIOMA 1 1010 vlgryarf ,f.. ' Or a*f A Cdl a\u] �IA.IM - Tom 4 =T Ilor4 7. M F..\. Fiia d U..w U -1 /UU pV U.N] m R ✓..alf,aiw d Mwd flw\ f7 -Ia.Ar M fwd f4✓..1 t. low tw arr Nan w\w.M d.1Jw] 141rw aw aar aAYJwJYdwYr J.. AIUW /al• IY A]..uV law (a) I.al a.] a.a^afw ..x.1.1 M wwla'• -• rasa A aaw M I.a rsYiw J . fwawa. w/ A) a4 4 A M .lalar w Mar w M.. r V .aalwA u,r J M .wl,l� d M AIS.J. 4wr]a Caw.l A0. IL RAM d CNIIOMA [awp d W fyMa6r I1r. ]-If -r �•AIFKI•S •♦ � _ � M a ] IS NAtr'gl aivO.a.A C" d W f��171q Gala Llf/Y %.. ` 4 +..r... ..v.. Y, Jr.a • ....r.r . W M 4r r.na. r., si./., w r..r �a v. r..ra ar. r w a.u,.• n.. w .., r,rr r.. \.r W, r \, r rw I .\ .rW... r.1iw �M. ♦rw.irY..w..M..rr...auw.. ^w...., \.. r.. M.. w�. M. r....rr .war.. 4 r., r• r..ia Wa . r a.wr.. � LL IbwaI.IJLL.r/J IL'L��w... u...�n a II�.Y1.1.1 ANr W.Y. Niar 7fY WrrwD.f.wwar Ur Odf I AIraMA .raAat.afar. 9rfu.r Yr _ III tlY _ro M,AIM1 �fwMa.f /Md Wd..� _ORw w.r� a_.0 ty ]• vaa_ r ANr W.Y. Niar 7fY WrrwD.f.wwar Ur Odf I AIraMA .raAat.afar. 9rfu.r Yr _ III tlY _ro M,AIM1 �fwMa.f /Md Wd..� _ORw w.r� a_.0 ty ]• tttttttt, a 14--, morkulu Lt- } � .• �`` /�• it Hit- Jul Its ILI s Lil 1 r o Y � _ S d u O i •� � J L W O` ,6! O dC O LiJ C 1]p�C Nti u 6PL� C y M N Q: J�� 6226 2 N W A S to It N 9 a 0 i Ar 11 .0 at AMA^ AN A�.0 5«r.rr. frr. r inrNlm m Rx 617c Im1 A xne araa ..•••••••+ -. t El 7751 A 1 AN. 11 .a.. 1.a 7Aw p 7, n"M 0' RAMkCr4K&) uc T Isll Saz.a. u h.•1.1 P•. 197.W TOM 12 AAAGaw w.l. Nl M «I +... M1.1.0 r ..r1. 4".. • p«r..a Y.. a •...l.� d • Sb..... 11 STAN OF CAWOOM C•.nrl a bsl w...,...11.... Ow 7/7'{'r �J` •.r.Yr�vr ..r�.�.... rY .. .r N..rw... .. r.i rrr �r r..... •.r...«rr.�..r.. r.r... r rrr \ la AIRIUMI f/ON 1yC .. A!►L1CA71011 AT 72AMW§MR 11 7TAT7 Of CAlnoe•A C" a 0.+. Y v.r.I rry rr..r•...r...r..—I r.ip r\rr.�...._�.Mrlr+r...► —1`r Lqn •rl..hr.. 14 uw.ry . .ter .. v...v. N ..rluM....w�4w.f....M�i.r r.....rr......r .�v..._..r. wr..I.... ~r. b Na Mdr M4v 1'AI.WII.r D.tvlw.a UNOdp .IrdrS p t.IrdN «4.. O N M O .- CWRS rule pA«wa.Iwd_..._._!Ww '•••«' x..`04• «�.. =,. 11a ry. e 4� Y � L I r�1t SASSY STEER• n I I X3 cC Rem rr tlfl icE I �I II U 99FcaSS JJ E - F'oor"ILL BLVD g 5' ty a GL �. Located; 9030 Vineyard Ave Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 i Property currently zoned Commerical Zoning of adjacent Properties; North: Commerical South: Conerical East : Commerical (vacant) u West : Corericrl / Flcod Control Y � L I r�1t SASSY STEER• n I I X3 cC Rem rr tlfl icE I �I II U 99FcaSS JJ E - F'oor"ILL BLVD g 5' ty a GL �. y; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT TO: City Council PRONt bevarly Auth SUBJEM Destruction of City Doc mente i• Attached for Council's consideration and approval in a resolution which authorizes destruction of certain city records. Soon after incorporation, the City retained the morvlces of a consultant to help staff not up a records management program. Included in this prograc vas a retention schedule for all documents which was in compliabce with the California Goverment Code. Under the authority of Government Code Section 34090, a 0apartment heed may destroy certain city records which are two yearn old under hie charge as long as such destruction is first approved by the city attorney and city council. Uuder consideration at this time are plamning records which are four years old or more. There to no bead by law to retain these records for more them this period. Thus purging th•a from the tctive files will give on much need file space. RECOMMENDATION1 It is recommended that Council approve Resolution No. 88- granting authorization to destroy theme records. An itemized list is attached. BAsba attach. 13 i RESOLUTION NO. 88 -la2r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUMMI GA. MUM" AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUKUM WHICH ARE NO LONGER REWIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER G0VERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 WRMUW, it has been determinad that certain City records under the charge of the following City Department are no longer required for public or private purposes: PLANNING WHEREAS, it has been determined that destruction of the above- mentioned materials is necessary to conserve storage space, an reduce staff time, expense, and confusion in handling, and informing the public; and WHEREAS. Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California authorizes tho bead of a City department to destroy any City records and docwents which are over two years old under hie or her charge, without rocking a copy thereof, after the acme are no longer required, upon the approval of the City Council by resolution and the written consent of the City Attorney; and WHEREAS, it is therefora desirable to destroy said records as listed It, Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. in storage, without making a copy thereof, which are war two years old; and WtMRPAS, said records have bean approved for destruction by the City Attorney. NOW, THEREVORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF RANCHO C0CAICNGA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records described an Exhibit "A" attached ..ersto and made a part hereof. CECTIUN 2: That the City Clerk is outhor17ed to allow examist.tion by and donation to the Department of Special Coll:ctic .a of the University Research Library, University of California, or o -har historical society designated by the City Council, any of the records uescribed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part bereof, except those decaed to be confidential. SECTION 3: The: the City Clerk shall cortify :o the ad�ptioo of this resolutioo, a "d thenceforth and thereafter the same #ball be in full force and affect 14 r a� Y EXHIBIT "A" 1983 Miscellaneous Correspondence URBAN FOREST GRANT Correspondence 1983 dated January thru December. Final Report Memos ?983 dated January thru December. Brochure Misc. 1984 Miscellaneous Correspondence. Media Outreach Correspondence 1984 dated January thru December. Grant Originals Street /Tree Selection Memos 1984 dated January thru December. Misc. Correspondence Backgrount Materials Planning Administration Files. 102 -01 Chronological Files 103 -01 Incoming Correspondence 200 -00 Planning General Standards Correspondence 200 -01 Planning Documents 201 -C1 Civil Defense Planning 203 -01 Commission- Public 1980 203 -01.03 Fontana General Plan 203 -01 Assisted Housing 203 -04 Housing Section 8 203 -04 Housing Newspaper Articles 203 -04 Housing Assistance Plan 203 -Da Housing Element 203 -04.1 Housing Task Force 203 -05 Industrial 203 -06 Survey of Retail 203 -07 Recreation Element 203 -08 Signs 203.09 Zoning 203 -09 Zoning Cammittee 203 -10 Zoning Violations 204 -01 Fiscal Impect 205 -03 Proposed Budget 401 -02 School Fees 401 -03 Assesments 402 -07 Special Events 405 -01 Bond Information 504 -02 Personnel 601 -02 Planning Requirements 601 -02 Expenditures 602 -01 Planning Commission General -- Expense Reports APPROVED FOR DES - RUCTION BY DISPOSITION OF RECORDS: tlx 4�+ CITY ATTORN .y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 6 1988 /1 TO: May;- erd Members of the City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PAYMENT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT - REC0MMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the amount of $6,720, to be charged to account number 01- 4289 -6028, as the City's shire for the litigation against San Bernardino County regarding court fines. This amount is approximately $1,400 above the estimate provided the City Council in June. It 1s significant to note, however, that the amount of court fines due Rancho Cucamonga may be as high as $200,000. Upon Council approval, a check in the amount of $6,'20 will be sent to the City of Yictorville for payment of attorney fees. Background As City Council 1s aware, in June, 1987, the City approved and entered into a Joint powers agreement to pursue litigation against the Coun y of San Bernardino regarding the issue of court fine distributions. At the time the agreement was drafted it was not known specifically what cities would Join the litigation. As of this month, litigation has been filed on behalf of all titles within the County of San Bernardino with the exception of the titles of Loma Linda and Needles. The City of San Bernardino Is not a part of the agreement and filed a separate action against the County. LMW /d Ja 88 -076 14 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: March 16, 1988 To: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager From: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager By: Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator Subjects Approval to Allow the Review of the Adopted Conceptual Design for Creeksido Park. City Council reconsider the 1984 Adopted Conceptual Plan for Creekside Park and authorize a redesign of the proposed site utilizing a community design task force. P. The City Council of October, 1984 adopted a Conceptual Park Plan for a three acre site called Creekside (see exhibit) . Located in the Red Hill area, the design was developed in conjunction with the Army Corps of Engineers as part of recreation improvements along the Cucamonga and Demons flood control channels. The concept utilized Cree::sido Park as an accass /destination point for a trail system envisioned along the flood control channel right -of -way. The recreation improvement package was bid in NoveLber of 1985 with a 50% cost share agreement between the City and Federal Government for the project. Bide received, though, were in excess of the Corps of Engineers estimates and budget allocation. To bring the project back into funding range, it was elected to delete Creekside Park. The remaining contract allowed development of three miles of trails from N.E. of the intersection of Hillside and Beryl to south of Baseline Road, two undorp.aeas located at 19th Street and Baseline Road, a rest area and bridge crossing at the confluence cf the Cucamcagc end Demene Channuls and final, five bridge crossing coordinated with the city developed design for Heritage Park. This work was completed in Marcb of 1986. V1 Creekside Park March 16, 1988 Page 2 Pe The 1987/1989 city budget allocated ftmds to complete the �;- Creeksids Park designation as a totally city funded project. By so doing, the project weld complete the conceptual master design for the flood control channel trail system, provided a neighborhood park in the Red 8111 area and beautify an area that as currently exists, is visually blighted. Direction was prcceeding toward development of working drawings for the ? construction of the Park when a characteristically unusual number of community inquires were received. The majority of contacts were simply asking for general information on the proposed park and to address the inquires and communicate better with the community, the Park and Recreation Commission f. suggested posting the site with a sign shoving the design for the park. The sign was erected during the last week In - December 1987 and immediately prompted continued inquiry that was tending toward the negative. In a continued attempt to communicate the proposed design, the January 21, 1988 Park and recreation Commission provided direction to conduct a community information meeting and to survey the community for their input on the project. A copy of the minutes of the community meeting and also a tabulation of the survey results are attached for your review. The results of the meeting and survey prompted the Park and Recreation Commission at their February 18, 1988 meeting to forward a recommendation to City council, that the 1984 adopted conceptual design for Creekside Park be shelved and a new design be develope' utilizing a community design tank force. Rsspeotfully submitted, Robert A. Rizzo Assistant City Manager RAR:DL:bs Attachment 18 ,ry .% i, h� 1 iq TI PROJECT LOGATiON NOT TO SC1L 0 A Ut10EiC?C5! February 9, 1988 Special Meeting Creekside Park Red Hill Resident Meeting The Red Hill community meting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. The meeting was attended by about 85 residents from the Red Hill community. Also present were Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator, Commissioners Henry and Riggs, Bob Rizzo, Assistant City Manager, Karen McGuire- Emery, Associate Park Planner, Sharon Hickok, Assistant Park Planner, Ray Carraoco, Deputy Sheriff, and Bea Smidorls Senior Office Assistant. Dave Leonard gave a presentation to the community residents of the background of how the property was acquired from the Cucamonga county water District for $1.00 per year for 50 years. How the Engineers orin the Services design staff requirements worked for with the the park. The conceptual design was presented for review to the Park and Recreation Commission and to the Planning Commission for their approval. On October 1986 City Council approved the design concept for the 3.0 acre park site located at Alta Cuesta and Base Line Road. construction cast is estimated approximately to be $385,000.00 and will be derived from the Park Development Furd. L question and answer segment was allowed after the briof back ground of the park site. Mr. Bob Todorof 7751 Valle Vista: Suggested that only a greenbelt area should be at the site No parking Trail access only Mr. Bill Holley 7515 Valle Vista: In favor of park Loading and unloading only Incorporate a playground A walk -way be constructed to the school along the eastsids of the road to the park for school childrons safety. Ms. Peggy Chostal 7670 Alta Cussta: Traffic already to heavy for that area No parking Q\ 1' Mrs. Vanberger 7881 Lit& court: No parking Mrs. Quaintance 7440 Buena Vista: T. Modify park site .g: Pcuntains and seating only j No Restroome No Parking " Mr. George Lindsey 7881 Csaino NOrto Sheriffs doing a good job in the Red Hill area «` iite has not been cleaned up Beautify the lawn area - Landscape only °. Mrs. Sharon Bear 7599 Cielito Rojo: Object to horses Community against the park Mr. Vote Locky 7354 Villa Serena: 5, How far south will the trails go Ms. Betty Man 7886 Alta Cuesta: Against the park Unsafe for residents Me. Pat Moore 7461 Buena Vista Drive: Traffic too heavy already Blind corner for children to croon No parking Mr. Bob Grigsby 7581 El Arco: P.T.at kind of parking 11 htu will be available Will it hnvo security lights Mr. Josh Warren 7893 Alta Cucuta: No parking High school students will congregate at park day and night Mr. Jeff Oxnard 8447 Villa La Dora: Vandalism to their homes from people using the park site Mr. Rick Vandenberg 7749 Valle Bresca: Who and how will the trails be patrolled for security especially under the underpass AI 11r. Dave Romensky 7430 Via Persian: Residents can use Red Hill Community Park Insurance on homes in the park its area will this go up because of the park and vandalism? Lighting what kind and how long will it be one at night Ns. Gail Narlo 8282 calla do Prado: Their is no sheriffs response now for her street considered (lovers lane). inviting more parties from area youth that this park Should be a passive park No parking Mr. Dale Prisbse 7904 Valle Vista: , No parking i, No restrooma J �G Na. Dotty NcNay 7600 Calls Caslno: r Trees and shrubs only No equestrian - who will clean up after the horses No. Joan NcRanakei 7518 Buena Vista: Greenbelt only Horne trail along wash o.k. Mr. Richard Znpolr 7675 Alta Monte: + Agrees with the Park No parking Change name of park Walk way to other side of wash No. Ann Boyl 7699 Buena Vista: No parking only inviting area youth to mill around lighting now late on -Q3 a PW S °• .lt Creekside Park x f., SURVEY RESULTS Y 4; • Total number of mailings: 627 . Total number of survey cards returned: 211 5 • % of Households participating* 34% � ipresponG63 p :rce �g� A� y FAVOR PARK AS PROPOSED so 24 y FAVOR PARK WITH MODIFICATION 78 37 DO NOT WANT PARK 83 39 *Comments: 'f 51 NO PARKING 24% e 49 WANT LANDSCAPING 231 1 29 NO RESTROOM 14% 28 NO PICNIC TABLES 13% 19 NO MORE PARRS NEEDED 91 19 WILL INCREASE TRAFFIC 9% 18 WANT SEAT BENCHES 9% 12 WILL BRING DNDESIRP.BLES 9% 10 WANT TRAIL DEVELOPMENT 5% 6 NO PARR LIGHTING 31 4 NO SHELTERS 21 4 NO HORSE TRAIL 21 3 CHANGE PARK NAME 1% 3 WANT PLAY AREA 1% 2 WANT DIRE PATHS it 2 WANT SHELTERS 1% 2 NO BARBECUES it 1 WANT EXERCISE COURSE .05% 1 NO TRAILS .05% 1 NO LAKE .05% �4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Mark R. Lorimer, Sr. Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MATER POLICY STATEMENT RECONKE40ATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution supporting the 1987 Mater Policy Statement adopted by the League of California Cities. Information Through the office of Al Yankey, Chino City Councilman, the City Council is requested to adopt a resolution supporting the 1987 Water Policy Statement adopted by the League of California Cities. The statement is a consensus document that represents the combined efforts of cities, counties and otter public agencies throughout California, in addressing the broad water needs for the entire state. The policy addresses various water related issues including water conservation, reclamation, water quality, flood control, areas of origin, water storage and water financing. This document is considered to be significant since it bridges the differences held to the past between northern and southern California representatives. Attached for your review 1s a letter from Chino Councilmember Al Yankey, along with a copy of the League's 1987 Water Policy Statement. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this item, please feel free to contact me. MRL /dja Attached 88 -084 ,� olJ 10220CEMMLAVENUE Ro.e0 %007 MN0, CAUFORNN V710 0 CRY HALL (?14)02T -?S" AL YANKEY CHINO CITY COUNCIL February 23, 1988 The Honorable Dennis L. Stout, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear mayor Stouts On October 6, 1987, the League of California Cities adopted a Water Policy Statement. This is a consensus document that represents the combined efforts of individuals and organizations throughout the State of California. The purpose of the document is to provide a framework for California's water future by addressing the broad water needs of the entire State. The Statement is considered to be a keystone document that bridges the differences held in the past between Northern and Southern California representatives. According to our city Engineer, it lays the foundation for the proper management of water needs State -wide and is the first uniform policy that has been adopted. Staff emphasizes that this Statement provides for water resources management rather than a piecemeal approach that has developed over the years from proprietary interests and perceived rights of water ownership. The policy consists of statements made in 13 areas relating to water. These areas are as follows: 1) California water concerns 2) water conservation and reclamation 3) water quality 4) areas of origin 5) wager storage 6) conveyance systems 7) flood control a) groundwater 9) fish and wildlife 10) drainage 11) recreation 12) now technology NM pNYw.l Nu u9ANA a�Q 13) financial consideration For your information, i am highlighting ooveral points within these categorloe that I fool are noteworthy: - water is a finite resource and water needs are projected to increase significantly in the future - conservation and reclamation are essential and these efforts should be an essential part or all programs - maintenance of a high - quality water standard in a first priority - the State Water Resources Control Hoard should retain control over Bay -Dalta standards with all other- water quality objectives being dealt with on a regional basis through the continuation of the regional water quality control board system - importance of the quality of groundwater and ,other bodies of water - ultimate reasonable and beneficial water needs of AU areas of origin should be assured - acknowledge critical nature of the development of new technology - financing must continue to include federal, state, and local governments As a member of the League's Environmental Quality Policy Committee and an elected official for an area municipality, I would encourage your consideration and approval of the 1987 Water Policy Statement. For your information, I am enclosing a copy of the Statement and a copy of Chino Resolution No. 88 -1, supporting the Statement I would appreciate receiving a copy of any action your City Council may take on this issue. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Ou �Lev AL Y KEY, Councilman Member, LCC Environmental Quality Policy Committee Enclosures cc: Chino City Council, city Manager, San Leandro Councilman Tony Santos a-I RESOLUTION N0. 88 -1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHINO SUPPORTING THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES WATER POLICY STATEMENT WHEREAS, on October 6, 1987 the League of California Cities adopted a Water Policy Statement, which provides a framework for California's water future by addressing the broad water needs of the entire Stater and, WHEREAS, this is considered to ba a keystone document that bridges the differences held in the past between Northern and Southern California representativeal and, WHEREAS, the league of California Cities has requested each City to review the Statement and consider its adoption, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Chino hereby supports the 1987 Water Policy Statement and authorizes the transmittal of this Resolution to the league of California Cities. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19th day of January, 1988. FR3D AGUTAR, MAYOR ATTEST: GAYLE GAIBO, CI Y CLERK STATF 07 CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) CITY OF CHINO ) I, GAYLE GARBO, City Clark of the City Of Chino, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 19th day of January, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBEIRS: YANKEY, ERWIN, SAWHILL, ULLOAI AGUTAR NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMENBERS: NONE GAYbE GARM,, CITY CLERK U Q7 4 6: League Of Catifornia . Cities • u.tara: t ' A 1.. iiµ 4 )qi t. 7•, M MATER POLICY STATE11ENf Leaps of California Cities Adopted October 1987 $7.00 (plus Calif. Isles tax) 36 i LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CALIFORNIA WATER POLICY STATEMENT IMTAODUtT1011 Alp 91011OWLEDGHENTS The League's Water Policy Statement is a consensus document that attempts to address the water needs and concerns of all pats of California. It is intended to provide a broad policy framework, not i detailed supply plan, for California's water future. In the past, the League has taken no position on statewide water issues because of the divisiveness of the subject. This year, however, a major effort was made to roach consensus and to develop a Water Policy Statement that is acceptable to cities throughout the state. We are grateful to thosw cities and individuals who have provided thoughtful review of working drafts of the Policy Statement. Work began on the Water Policy Statement in late 1986, as a result of an Annual Conference Re .lotion and an Environmental Quality Policy Committee Work Program item. A Water Policy Subcomoittee of the League's Environmental Quality Policy Committee was formed to begin the task of crafting the statement. The Sub• committee consisted of two members from each of the League's thirteen divisions Peggy Mensinger, Mayor, Modesto, and a member of the League's Board of Directors, was Chair. Bob Bacon, Council Member, West Covina, was Vice-Chair, A list of the Subcommittee memhership follows this page. In the process of developing a Water Policy Statement for the League, the Subcommittee reviewed and drew upon previous work and policy statements of a large number of California organizations. They include: the County Supervisors Association o' California, California Association of Local Councils of Government, Southern California Association of Governments, Superior California Water Association, Mountain Counties Water Resources Association and the California Water Commission. The Subcommittee also reviewed summary reports that synthesized the policies of other groups, including the Southern Califorila Water Committee, the Committee for Water Policy Consensus, the Committee for Delta Resources Improvement, North CoastAl Counties Supervisors Association, and San Joaquin mo Valley Agricultural Water Coittee Working drafts of the statement were critiqued by League divisions and other organizations during the summer of 1987, and a preliminary final draft was distributed to all cities in September for comment The League's Board of Directors adopted the Water Policy Statement at their meeting at the League's Annual Conference in October 1987. Throughout Its deliberations, the Water Policy Subcommittee and the Environmental Quality Policy Committee were assisted by Or Robert Hagan and Marcia Kreith of the University of California, Davis, Cooperative Extension. The League wishes to thank them for their expertise and assistance, which remained policy- neutral at all times City officials are encouraged to review the Water Policy Statement, as well as the appended educational material and to share this packet with constituents and other organizations. It is hoped that this documsent will assist California city officials to better understand the water issues facing California and that it will be the basis for future constructive work. yhwatel2 /mist s. r` 4 MATER POLICY SOBCOIRIITTEE League of California Cities DIVISION MEMBER Central Valley Clyde Bland, Council MemNr, Tracy Peggy Mensinger, Mayor, Modesto (Chair Channel Counties Penny Rappa, Council Member, San Luis Obispo Dave Matson, Director of Public Services, Pismo Beach East Bay Bob Chesty, Council Member, Albany Barbara Price, Council Member, Antioch Imps ^lal County Eric Matwick, Council Member, Holtville Sedalia Sanders, Mayor, E1 Centro Inland Empire Dale Bohnsnberger, Mayor Pro Tom, La Quints Judy Mlebu',yer, Mayor, Moreno Valley Los Angeles County Bob Bacon, Council Member, West Covina ('lice Chair) Gilbert Do La Rosa, Mayor, Pico Rivers Monterey Bay Stephanie Harlan, Council Member, Capitol& Paul Ogden, City Manager, Hollister Orange County Jahn Holmberg, Mayor, La Habra Carrey Nelson, Council Member, Brea Peninsula Pat Castillo, Council Member, Sunnyvale Jim Smith, City Mansgar, Redwood City Redwood Empire Barbara Kondylls, Council Member, Vallejo Susan Stomps, Mayor, Novato Sacramento Valley Robert Springer, Council Member, Placerville Gary Freeman, Mayor, Orland San Diego County Anne Coated, Council Member, Encinitas Harriet Stockwell, Mayor Pro Tam, E1 Cajon South San Joaquin Valley Rollie Moore, Council Member, Bakersfield Barbara Wyckoff, Mayor, Lemoore Ex•Officlo Lois Ewen, Council Member, Coronado and Chair, Environmental Quality Policy Committee Tony Santos, Council Member, San Leandro and Vice Chair, Environmental Quality Policy Committee yhwaterl /mist ii .: i4 UATOt POLICY STATEMENT Table or contents Page o Introduction and Acknowledgments i o Tent of Water Policy Statement I. California Water C oncerns ......................... ........... I 1I. Water Conservation and Recl3 ut ion ...........................2 III. Water Quality . ................6...I.......... ...............2 11. Areas of Origin ................ ..............................3 V. Water Storage . ... ........ ............................... .3 VI. Conveyance Systems ....... ............................... .. .e VII. Flood Control ............... ............................... .S,_ V:II. Groundwater .................... ..............................5 ,. IX. Fish and Wildlife ......... .... ..............................5 X. Drainage ................... ............................... ..6 XI. Recreation ..................... ..............................6 XII. New Technology ... ... ..... ..........................,,..7 XIII. Financial Consi derati ons ...... ..............................7 o Appendices A. Glossary of Water Words B Water Assumptions, Goals and Projections C. Water Map (see centerfold) 1:AWE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES WRIER POLICY STATEMENT Adopted October 6, 1987 STATEMENT OF VMFOSE Every region and every water user in California have needs vhlch must be met. This water policy stateemnt is crafted with an eye to alai we, as an association representing Califoraia's 444 cities, and California, can do to abet the needs of every section and user without negatively Impacting other regions and users. 1. CALIFORNIA WATER CONCERNS 1. Water needs are projected to increase significantly in the While water is a renewable resource, It is a finite one. Comprehensive water management programs, combined with additional supplies, must be provided to neat present and future needs and to correct and mitigate groundwater overdraft. 2. Local, state, and federal agencies should prepare lnng- term"waier managemnt plans and policies. 3. Local, state, and federal agencies should establish contingency plans to meet short -tare water emergencies. 4. Water development projects must bs economically and environmentally sound. S. Critical California water issues cannot be solved without the cooperation of the state and federal governments. The League supports communication and cooperation arong policy groups with emphasis on finding statewide consensus. 6. Protection of thi quality and integrity of surface and groundwater resources is fundamental to the health and welfare of California and all its citizens. 7. Protection of the long -tea viability of rivers and streams for instream uses such as fishing, recreation and aesthetics 1s vital. 8 Selving the water Quality, levee stability and fishery problems in the Sacramento -San Joaquin Delta is a primary stop in developing any plan to matt the state's water needs. 9. The best use of currently defined Wild and Scenic Rivers as scenic and recreational should be supported, while recognizing that future generations msy re- evaluate these concepts. 10. Drainage problems related to California's irrigated agriculture should be recognized as a severe problem which needs to addressed. .I- 3y i J e.. 11. Adequate funding for the State Mater Resources Control Board and its regional boards-to carry out thnir enforcement responsibilities is of critical importance Ii. WATER CONSERVATION AND RECLMATION 1, (efficient ugo of be pr cticed)both In the urban (rouse nd agricultural saC2nrs wherever feasible and economical. 2. Increased conservation and refinements in water managemndt praices should for essential development, ter supply Dro9 3. should be as, whereethenwatersotherwisel wouldiunne essarilYrbe: supply gruundrater,tar c)tosca9e into thi+atmosph ore , b) seep nto unusable 4 cities and counties myist hraugh to lenld•useaplanningepr cuss ort,othereregulatory aDproachs. 111. WATER MItY and 1. objectives throughout teCalifurnia shohlduabetysupported standards asa first priority. Surftce and groundwater should be protected from contamination, even when trstmart methods an, available to meet dringqking water stagndards. e 2. drfcuewaterranduagroundvaterrtonsa f9uadaPubltcahealthhseuuldlnbe supported. 3. Local, !Late and federal governments and the private sector should for the safe degradation of management o both surface water and groundwater. to avoid 4. Adequate for arch should be o determine appropriate public health use of S. Additional research and education heah! +as habicidas and pesticides dclternatv stoteirusage well as research to reduce industrial and housesold hazardous wastes should be supported. 6. ovor B +Y•Daltaewater galityCobjectives sand san standards. In therremainder of the through the continuations should b3 regional water qualityrcontrol board system. T other bodiesc of water, including o he problimt ofI salt gwaterw Intrusion should be recognized. 35 .2. w 8. r- otection, as well as enhancement where practicable, of Delta water quality, while providing adequate future supplies for all segments of the state should be requireA. - g. Standards balancing protection of all beneficial uses of BayOslta water, including water flowing into or exported from the Delta, must be adopted by the State slater Resources Control Board and enforced to protect the environmental health of the Say-Delta system. Pollution from point and con -point sources into the Bay and Delta shall be controlled as stringently as practicable. 10 Programs and facilities to assure safe drinking water for those regions dependent on imported Delta water should be supported. 11 Studies of the moral and long -term health of the Bay-Delta system relative to effects of Delta freshwater outflow; municipal, industrial, dredginguactivitiesishould be tupporte non-point discharges; fills; and 12 The Statw Mater Resources Control Board should assure the continued monitoring for contaminants in the Delta. 1V. AREAS Of ORIGIN 1. Ultimate reasonable and beneficial water needs of all areas of origin should be assured. State law should continue to provide that only water surplus to the reasonable and beneficial needs of the areas of origin may be exported. 2 Areas of origin protections should apply to all water sources, including groundwater. 3 Reasonable and beneficial water needs of the areas of origin should include instreas needs or uses, including recreation and sediment flushing. t Areas of origin should be afforded financial assistance to dcvelop new water facilities. Projects that export water from areas of origin should not Increase the cost of new local water development projects. 5 Those feature. of now projects that are required by state or federal agencies to enhance area of origin recreattan, fish, wildlife and water quality should be the financial responsibility of state and federal government. V. MATER STORAGE 1 The construction and retention of economically feasible and environmentally sound flood control, storage and rilti -use projects tnat will meet present and future needs should be supported. 2 The developaent of additional surface facilities and use 07 groundwater basins to store surface water that is surplus to that needed to maintain SVRCB Bay -Oelta estuary water quality standards should be supported •3- NO VI. 3 Project developers shall mitigate the negative impacts of water storage projects on fishery and wildlife resources, adjacent lands, water quality and recreation: CONVEYANCE SYSTEERS 1. River. whether mae seeder orginatural, not should limit beSacramento eg constructed and/or operated to minimize seepage and erosion problems. They should be constructed to mitigate these problems and other adverse Impacts an adjacent lands. Z. Entities benefiting from water conveyance projects elsewhere in the tate projtcts�usucheas resposnsible for correct seepate and siediment problems,moncman-made or natural waterways. 3. protect adjauntp lands tfrom flood bore ocher aerosivenflowsv provided any adverse impacts on fish and wildlife habitat are mitigated. 4 withlregionalu Systems s tom Assist l n maxlelzinnus tofu l0 cal e ground band surface waters during droughts and earrgenclas. S Conveyance of water across the Delta should be through existing channels wherever possible. Delta tra.msfor system improvements should be near ruse in e operated Sin Joaquin River. a o if Possible eliminate G. capacityaIn the Delta transfer systems increased channel of existing channels In the Delta, construction of Delta facilities, and the development of water storage should-be designed to conserve additional waters, improve water quality for both *apart and local use, and incmnase the decreasiadverse impacts on fish and wildlifeerisourcasts, and also !o 1. Construction of Delta transfer facilities should not proceed until the Department of Fish and Game and MR have entered into agreement to implement measures to offset the SWP's Inpacts on the Delta fisheries and otheroDa ecological r +n concerns facilities- a. are shown to be adversely affected Implementation of an integrated program of rehabilitation and maintenance of Delta levees, involving federal, state, local and user Interests for the purposes of protecting the islands, waterways anA other conduits,tnaturaing s isto age, not etc , should be hsuppo,rted. Costs water and responsibilities should be fairly allocated among beneficiaries of such a program. 9. Until an integrated (D(elta laves program Is initiated, the Delta levee Codetsection program 9 0 12gol)oshould Senator Howard and implement dtfornla Water ?11 - 4 - VII. FLOOD GOKML _ 1. Development of joint federal, state and local flood control projects should continue. Adequate funding from these sources should be provided to assure timely construction of needed facilities. 2. Multi- purpose benefits and the ability of the local entity to pay should be considered ir, the 1st- shartn0 and funding formulae for flood control projects. 3. Responsible local lard use planning and regulation of flood prone areas I s essential. VIil. GROUNDWATER 1. The State Water Resources Control Board, through the regulatory process of its Rogionel Boards, should ensure the highest possible quality and safety of groundwater by preventing contamination from point and non -point sources, especially for usable water. 2. Local drilling, staling and abandonment ordinances for water supply and monitoring wells for the protection of groundwater and public health should be supported. 3. The principle that local entities within groundwater basins (i e cities, counties, special districts an the WQCB's) working cooperatively should be responsible for and involved In developing and Implementing basinwide groundwater basin management plans where applicabls should be supported. The plans shoulo Include, but not be limited to: a) protecting groundwater quality; b) identifying means to correct groundwater overdraft; c) implementing better irrigation techniques; d) increasing water reclamation and reuse; and e) refining water conservation and other management practices. 4. State and federal involvement in developing groundwater management plans should include technical and other assistance for defining the characteristics of the groundwater resources. 5 Financial assistance from the state and federal governments should be made available to requesting local agencies to develop and implement their groundwater management plans, and to clean up contaminated groundwater basins. 6 Planned, joint use of surface and groundwater and development of Incentives for such conjunctive use for increased efficiency should be encouraged. IX. FISH AND WILDLIFE 1. Protection, maintenance, and restoration of fish and wildlife habitat and resources and their beneficial uses including recreational and amu coerciai uses should be supported. Where fusible, enhancement of fish and wildlife habitats should be provided. 2. Adequate flows to protect existing ecological instream uses should be supported. . 5 - 38 ! 3. Mitigation measures shall be on -site if fusible, otherwise as close as practicable to the area of adverse impact. _ 4 wildlife water resources shall Mitigationte costs adverse should i be ^t borne be the beneficiaries of the projects. S. Enhancement features of projects should be paid by the requiring agency. X. DRAIMABE A. Agriculturgal Drainage and Salinity 1 agricultural tdrraainagee problems i is essential acceptable ad in solutions to interest. ofEcurrenntt nandlfuture agricultural awaterlproject lands planning and implementation. 2 preventiveeand remedial solutions to agricultural drainage g investigate 3. existing and future cost-sharing naSs formula roblems implementing includeglstates and federal governments and irrigation project beneficiaries. B. Urban and other Run -Off 1 Finding safe and environmentally acceptable solutions to problems caused by urban run -off and drainage from non -point sources, such as storo and dry weather flows, is essential and in the public interest. 2. Similarly, finding safe and environmentally acceptable solutions to other drainage and run -off problems, such as those ccused by mining. dairying and forest practices, is essential and in the public interest. 3 Equitable sharing public anri it frImplementingsotioso urban and other run-off problems should occur. XI. IIEcREATIOM 1. Wter reecreationalp uses, rndctprovidednew recreational opp siortunitieswhere minimize adverse iacts to feasible. 2 stets development costs of water and project beneficiariesd be boron by the 3. operation njunctions within water c projects o should be recreational providedl from on-site user fees and other applicable sources. other costs incurred as a result of these rescue, should rsceivetasuistancetfrom statewand federal sourcesemergency -6- W r =., .r �F ow C' of \ M - N Awbw CUt •� CC- C40" Cowl LA - LM NMIN \., \ $A -seem AY �Nr A MAJOR STORAGE RESERVnl E ,VY��� GftXtG t1YEt NUMfYt GYTNOGIitG IGCM71E6 "T YET C"ATGVCUS N E V A D A D `ID CONVEYANCE FACILITIES L11 LEGEND 3 IMIG�GMG MXC >tXIMwaY wnGI �CY1OrY - Mt JGGG*It n rtoeG u�w[r w Xa r - TGIwG LNG LOCAL MO.IECTS - R.IU LN«UE - C W w wrTG1 STATE WATER PROJECT ® FEDERAL P90XCTS E ,VY��� GftXtG t1YEt NUMfYt GYTNOGIitG IGCM71E6 "T YET C"ATGVCUS N E V A D A D `ID CONVEYANCE FACILITIES L11 ;Xk MI. KW TICHNOLOeT Developwnt•r of now technology in water use, reuse, desalinition, k" detoxification; and so forth, is critical. This should be prWrilyv funded by the federal and state governments. Public-private 'partnerships in this P research alse-'should be encouraged. A high priority east be given to the protection of public health. s XIII. FIN CIAL CMIDMTIONS I. The fact that all types of water - related activities and projects require money, which may be fluted in availability, is recognized. 2. It is recognized that (a) the development and operstion.ofiwter'supply, water conveyance, flood control, water storage, andiwastewater treatment facilities is frequently beyond the capability of, local areas to finance, (b) since most facilities have widespread benefits, it has become traditional for federal, state, 'and local governments `to share their costs; and (e) it is necessary that such - sharing be continued and that different institutional arrangements, public - private partnerships, a,M user fees be explored. 3. Those features of projects or programs that are required by, state,, federal or other agencies for enhancement should be paid for by the requiring agency. yhwater.misc z " . 0 �l Il I of 4 I . APPlYOIX A — g, C GLOSSnRY C, A REVIEW OF SOME WOROS WHICH ARE OFTEN USED IM WATER POLICY DISCUSSION (lost of these are not official �f definitions but eppresent �%�• Como" usage.) V Prepared for the League of California Cities by Robert M. Hagan, Extension Water Specialist Marcia Kraith, Program Representative University of California Cooperative Extension July 1987 r G' 43 Affordable - -A word used increasingly to express concern whether "WITr1=3 of water will be able to meet the cost. Whether people view water as affordable will depend on many factors. WA ricultural dra�insg_e -- Usually refers to installed drains to per- m t remove of water which accumulates within plant root zone. May be essential to maintain favorable salt balance for plant growth. May contain 3„leni1:0, salinity, pesticides, herbicides, etc. Area and County of Origin protections, etc. -- Refers to legisla- t ve provisions or protect ng water r ghts of these areas. Area of Origin Law -- Applies to "a watershed or area wherein water originates, or an area immediately adjacent thereto which can be conveniently supplied with water therefrom.- Because this law was inaoted 23 part of the Central Valley Project Act it applies to the Sacramento River watershed. The Burns- Porter Act subsequently defined the Sacramento -San Joaquin Delta to be part of the watershed of the Sacramento River. Gives Area of Origin preferential rights regarding operation of federal Central Valley Project and to contract for State Water Project water and to certain rights to construct projects or make diversions, provided use is reasonable and beneficial. (CA Water Code 11128, 11460 - 11463). County of Origin Law -- Prohibits State Water Resources onCol Board mom assignment of rights which will deprive a county in which the water originates "of such water necessary for the development of the county." (CA Water Code Section 10505). Delta Protection Act -- Establishes that an adequate supply of water in--the--belta is necessary to the peace, health, safety and welfare of the people of the state, except that delivery of such water is subject to County of Origin and Area of Origin laws. (CA Water Code Sections 12200 - 12220). California Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and Federal Wild and Scenic liiverTldi=- EaEabTf n ci—cain rivers or scEions oO=r Vers are -ro be preserved in their free - flowing condition. The California law (CA Public Resources Coda 5093.50 - 5093.65) allows domestic water diversion for r431denta of counties through which the ricer flows, provided there is no adverse effect upon the free - flowing character of the river. California law finds thtt the free - flowing state of such rivers 13 a reasonable and beneficial use within the meaning of the state constitution. Characteristics of roun�dwate_r resource -- Include quality, quantity, rate of renewal — I nd yield. Com en3ation -- "Full replacement for unavoidable fish and wildlife resource 03303 in terms of habitat area and long term renew- ability of the quality and quantity of such resources. In the Y4 interest of cl�rifLcat ion, compensation does not mean mone4ary Payment as a substitute for replacement of rescurces losses." CmnjUnati! uce of surface and groundwater -- Planned point use of surface and groundwater. Th1a usually involves maximizing use of surface water in wet years (with minimum groundwater pumping) and using any surplus surface water to recharge groundwater, and in dry years augmenting surface supplies by drawing on the stored groundwater. Conservation -- "Fish and w gat on an compensation.^ tldlita resource loss prevention, mit!- s Conervation (of water)- -heans efficient use of water. Also means re uc ngL:ater %ases, or elialnating waste; storing water for water use; preserving water quality. Contamination - - "an impairment of the quality of the waters of the state FY was a to a degree which creates a hazard to the public health through poisoning or through tho spread of disease." (CA Water Code Section 13050). (See Pollution) Contamination sources o n_t d schar a= Source is Identifiable, as from a pipe or ra n tch. Non- oint dis��char��a -- Sources are more diffuse and not easily entlfied wwith well defined outlets; includes runoff from agricultural or forested land, general urban runoff, except where collected In identifiable drains. Davis- Grunsk bond - -This act of legislation established a bond una to ac !Cate financing of projects in counties with limited financial resources. Demand /Need -- "Demand" usually refers to a statement of water requirements which may be projected on the basis of past water use practices. In contrast, use of term "need" is intended to refer to water that is truly needed to satisfy purpose if water is efficiently utilized. Enhancement -- "Development or improvement of fish and wildlife resource values of the area affected py a project beyond that which would occur without the project.^ Fnvironmentall safe- -Not a precise technical term, but used to mean act ens w Len nave little or no adverse impact. f.tenI3lca sound /feasible- -Not a precise technical term, but on 11 e a refers o a a ance of costs and benefits. Formerly emphasis was placed on calculating benefit -oost ratioa. Uncer- tainties and possible abuses In such calculations have raised vuestiona concerning usefulness of such celculations. Problems include what types of benefits to involve as well as what costs to involve. Many, including environmentally related benefits and costs, can not be adequately quantified. 45 ME Fish and wildlife issues- -See Compensation, Conservation, ��ncement�T3K_and_5Mlife resources, Inatream uses, Loss prevention mea3ure0, Hitigation, Preservation, Protection, and Restoration. Fish and wildlife resources -- "Birds, mammals, fishes, amphibians, reptiles, invertebrate animals, endangered, threatened or rare native plants, their haoitat area and all types of aquatic and land vegetation and -_:Iar factors of the environment upon which resources are depcndint." (See Sea. 45 of Fish and Game Code for definition of fish). Flood Irrigation--Used to describe what is more appropriately celled asin and torder irrigation in which land prepared as basins or land bordered by small levees 13 Irrigated with .rela- tively large streams of water. Groundwater mana ement - -The process of controlling extraction of groundwater and or p Fanned recharge to manage the supply and /or quantity of groundwater. Objectives of groundwater management may Include minimizing (or preventing) adverse effects such as g- eundwater overdraft or quality degradation. (Also see Conjunc- tive use and Wate: management practices). Groundwater overdraft - -Where over a period of time groundwater ex Neer on excee s natural or artificial recharge. Instre_ am uses -- Include fish, wildlife, recreation, aesthetics, fiye eo -power production, dilution of contamination, waste dis- charge, sediment transport. Local entities -- includes cities, c+ unties, water districts, joint F3, etc. Loss prevention measures-- "DOSign_.., Ind implementing measures to avoid mue ate an=ong term Impacts to fish and wildlife resources." Miti ation-- "Measures to lessen or reduce adverse effects on fish and ww=Lfe resources through use of structural and non- structural loss prevention measures in project design and opera- tions." (See See. ISWO of CEOA Guidelines.) NEPA re:ulations have a functionally similar definition. NEPA definition includes restoration as a mitigation measure, however. Pollution -- "'Pollution' means an alteration of the quality of the waters of the state by waste to a degree which unreasonably sffeots: (1) such waters for beneficial uses, or (2) facilities which serve such beneficial uses. 'Pollution' may include 'contamination'." (CA Water Code Section 13050). (See Contamination) IA0 I Preservation -- "Maintenance and protection of fish and wildlife resoureas at levels that existed prior to the commencement of a (the current) project. Preservation is achieved through mitiga- tion for avoidable resource 103303 and /or compensation for unavoidable resource losses The term 'preservation' is synony- moU3 with ' conservation' as used in the U.S. Fish and (111dlife Coordination Act." Preservation does not assume that restora- tion will occur, but it could. Pro eot benefloiaries- -Those who gain value in some fashion from any of tfiZ5 ow ng: water supply, flood control, power genera- tion, recreation, salinity rep„ision, wildlife. Protection -- Department of Fish and Game appears to use this term w en re erring to legal enforcement by wardens. (See Preservatioa and Conservation). Real water 3avin 3-- Simply means there is an "actual" savings of waiar w-ii%h cou a put to other use. Reasonable and beneficial-- Depand3 on facts and eircumbt8nce3 of each _17ha-E-5s -a—Fe-nefloial use at one time may, because of changed conditon3, become a vaste of water at a later time " (Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay - Strathmore Irrigation Distr l ot.) The courts have determined the law requires an evaluation of the ascertainable facts in view of "the increasing need for water conservation within California." Beneficial uses include: storing water undergrou:rd if thereafter to be applied to beneficial p•rrpose3; use of water for recreation and preservation and enhar;ement of fish and wildlife resourceo. Re3toration- -Means to return to "original" conditions. (Selection of "or g nal" or base condition is often source of debate.) Reverse flows - -Where direction of flow in a channel is reversed, as n hecase of channels in South Delta which nurmally drain towards San Francisco Bay, but where pumping for export may cause flow reversal, drawing more saline water further into the Delta. Sediment transport -- Sediment of various particle sizes may be carried by moving water. The size of particles transported oy water i-area3es 83 velocity rises. SaurPlu3� water - -When used as a technical term in watcr contracts, th 13 is Me—water that is available after entitlement water has been delivered. The amount of surplus water varies from year to year, generally according to amounts of runoff. Surplus water ordinarily is less expensive to the user than entitlement water. Reference is $130 made to water which 13 "surplus to reasonable and 'beneficial u3e3 of area of origin and Ray /Delta." JItimate -- Imprecise meaning. Depends c,f Lire frams. 17 °r. Useable (troundwa ter -- Refers to g- WrTWT7- tTi_T63CTffd technical con traints which can be pumped situation. appropriate to the Water banking- -Not a precise term. Generally refers to storing presently surplus water in groundwater basins or in surface storage facilities. Hater mane emont ractices -- Relate to the varied objectives of ririgat on, mun cipa an industrial use. These objectives may not be compatible. In general, management practices are develwped to maximize economic returns and /or to minimize (or prevent) adverse environmental impacts including water quality degradation. ConserveM on or supply, reuse, treatment for use and waste disposal, and the plenned eonjunotion use of surface and groundwater are all aspects of water management. (Also see Conjunctive use and Groundwater management.) Water quality standards and objectives- -The Regional Water Oual- -Toards set "o eat vas" In their Basin Planning process which are equivalent to what EPA calls "standards ". The "standards" include numerical narrative criteria and plans to implement these criteria. Water reclamation -- Usually refera to removing contaminants in eater so tat C e water can be discharged into a receiving water without creating problems for fish, wildlife and other aspects of environment. Also, refers to water which has been treated to remove contaminants as required to permit its reuse particularly for irrigation of landscaped or agricultural areas. W�ey 8111 (Program) - -Dolts levee Maintenance Program. Declares t o Secramant Joaquin Delta, characterized by islands and meandering waterways, as a unique resource of major statewide 31gni:icance. Reasons are stated. Declares the system of levees 13 the key to preserving the phy31C21 chdracteristics of the Delta. Finds there is an urgent need for a higher degree of levee maintenance and rehabilitation throughout the Delta and that the state has an interest in providing technical and finen- Cial assistance. Establishes that local agencies maintaining non - project (private) levees shall be eligible for reimbursement from the General Fund. Reimbursement shall be at 50% of cost. (CA Water Code Sections 12980- 12991). Fr am California Department Fish and Game, 00 rations Manuel, published 6/87, per telephone conversation witti —H T Tharra t, Environmental Services, DF /G. I 8 1 A WATER ASflMM4, wis AM MMECTi6NS This Appawlix contains an excerpt from Proposed Water Polic Actions and Seas ` Possible i actr in California, publls rt y e n rare a orn a, v son o r cultural and Natural Resources, Cooperative Extension. This two voluF,%+ report is based upon materials originally developed for bridges Over Tra:bled Waters: Understandfng California's Water Controversies. Proposed Actions and Regional impacts,' a conference held September 30- October'2, 1966 at the Asilour Conference Center and sponsored by U.L. Cooperativa Extenslort. 49 .7 CHAPTER 2 ASSUMPTIONS, GOALS AND PROJECTIONS (This 0apter is condensed from talks at the Asftomar Conference by Robert H. Hagan, Water Specialist. UC Cooperative Extension; and Ralph Allison. Senior Fngineer, O'�ision of Planning, California Department of Water Resources.) The crucial role of assumptions and goats is sometimes overlooked In the dialogue over ester policy. Hagan: Assumptionz and goals determine perceived needs, which in turn influence proposed actions. if we understand this linker*, we will, I think, have a better opportunity to explorn presently existing differences concerning proposed actions, as well as way: in which differences can bs harmonizod. Tterefore, when we disagree about specific proposed actions, it may be useful to examine the underlying assumptions and goals. Another potentlaI sour:* of misunderstanding 1s the difference between assumptions and goals. In the context of water pol icy, an assumption may be defined simply as an informed estimate of an unknown future trend or condittian- -for erasgle, population growth or wau "v% Water policy position statements, however, often contain 'assumptions" which, on examination, look more tike goals. When the words 'should' or 'must occur, goals ere probably implied. Examples are statements to the effect that conservation 'should" be an essential part of water planning, or that water development 'must be cost - effectfve. However, the impact of such statements on water planning may be much the same whether they are considered as assumptions or goats. Crucial areas It 1s generally considered that three sets of assumptions and /or goals are especially critical for water planning and resolution of water controversies in California. These relate to (1) the water needs of Southern California, (2) agricultural water use and (3) water quality requirements of the Delta -San Francisco Lay system. A fourth critical issue area may be water needs of the rapidly developing mountain counties. Southern California. Underlying the disagreement over the need for more avatar o: t ease basin are varyyng estimates of future peculation and per - capita use. Soae assume that Southern California's population will stabilize or grow only vere slowly, whsle others project rearly 5.000,000 more people In the region by the )aar 4010. Sow- ,Ssume that per - capita use will decrease further due to high ^r population density and more effective water conse-vatfon, fmplem*nted perhaps by greater public acceptance or by water pricing. Others assume indfviduel use will remain close to present levels. A ricultursl rotor use. Assumptions here are critical because a small changeT51FrTgate-3 — acrege or in net water use per acre would appear to translate Into a such lerger relative change in the share of water avaiiable for urban use. For example, if irrigation water use in the state were reduced by about S percent, that would correspond to about 30 percent of pwsent,vrbar U". (However, about S percent of the present agricultural water supply cows from groundwater overdraft, largely in the San Joaquin Valley. Thus an actual gain In new reliable urban water supplies would not necessurtly take place.), Sam assume sluggish national and international market conditions, and other factors, will cause a decrease to acreage of irrigated crops; others assume those forces may slow the growth of irrtgaMd agriculture, but there stilt will be some expansion. Al It son: In making our OW ro,)ections, we assume that irrigation water use has levelled off as a result of the increasing Complexity of economic problems for agriculture." California has over 200 commercial crops, water, good land and good climate. In the past we have consistently underestimated Agriculture's ability to overcome Its problems and continue to expand. Water ualit in the Del system. were. tuo, differing assumpWons are cr t1c.1Tr w r p ann g roe hout California. Stae say existing water quality in the Delta and the gay does not impair beneficial uses, with the exception of striped bass and possibly sow other commercial or recreational fishing. Others say preterit eater quality is not only generally Inadequate but actually endangers gay Area property values. ° Hagan: we should reeogM,I that this is a complex system. Delta - San Francisco bay water quality conditions reflect a continually chtnging balance among input pollutants, both point and non - point; outflow from the Oalts into the gays flows directly to the gay from rivers and strains; end tidal action. The relative importance of each is under debate. It is important to keep in aiad that the Delta-SF lay area Is both an Importer of water for local use and a ruglon through which water passes for export. Thus, the Delta /Bay's interests reflect both viewpoints. Areas of orf In. Mountain counties are impacted by urban needs elsewhere in thTi`r&ti{ y agricultural water needs, particularly in the San Joaquin Valley; by water quality requirements in the Delta -SF gay system; by their own proposals oi neads or water. Tho qutoo. have fish and wildlife, assumptions tions a d goals. g Y 9 P Hagan: The rate of population increase in many of the mountain counties is greater than to much of California. They have agricultural needs to be dealt with; they have a desire for power generation; they have to provide for tnstream uses and provide export water; and they also have to most stringent regatrarents for discharge of wastewter - -a point that many outsiders have not fully taken into account. S/ am assumptions An Important source of intonation for water planning In California is the Department of Water Resource's Bulletin 150 series. which usually Is updated every four years. Fubllation of Bulletin 160 -87 1s expected In old. 1987. In formulating its projections (see belcw), the Deparhwnt sakes certain assumption$ about overall trends in the state, as well as water use and water supply. General assumptions made for DWR's 1983 tulletln, which are expected to be much the same in the 1967 verslos, arm !base: -- California's population will continue to increase beyond 1990, but at a slower rate. -- Statewide. irrigated cropland will continue to expand. although much more slowly. The percentage Increase to projected total state acreage between 1989 and 2010 would be the same as the percantage Increase that occurred during the eight years between 1972 and 1980. (The 1987 version assumes net water use by agriculture will remain at the 1980 level until 2010.) - -Water conservation will significantly reduce the unit amount of,water applied for both urban and agricultural purposes. - -The Impacts of water conservation on net use will vary greatly, depending on the hydrologic characteristics of each area that Influence the amount of reuse of excess applied water. - -For any anticipated increase in net water use, an affordable water supply must be Identified. This 1s particularly significant to agriculture. Two more specific DWR assumptions about agricultural and urban water use are these. - -By the year 2010, average irrigation efficiency for any crop that covers a relatively large area will approach 70 to 75 percent, a level now achieved by only the more ufftclent systems. - -Until the year 2010, at least, the Sautes Coastal region (Los Angeles, Santa Ana and San Diego hydrologic study areas) will account for half of total statewide population growth. OUR projections DHR's bulletins primarily project water supply and use trends. This Informstlon, too, reflects expert opinion. Allison: We're not basing our projections on grand economic theories or major policies to control growth or expand growth or anything like that, but generally the way the evidence points at the present time as to what developeents will occur in the use of water. sa w The DWR's detailed projections in gulletin 160 -83 will not be repeated Mre. One central point is that then is a projected 'Imbalance' between water use and water supply in major water -using areas, and that thesi•shcrtagu can be expected to grow steadily during the next 30 years or so. to the South Coastal region, when half the states population lives, then is potential for a shortage in dependable water supplies as early as 1980. The shortfall between water use and water supply, including shortages in the State Water Project, is expected to substantlallY incre ase groundwater overdraft -awn if net overdraft is reduced somewhat during very wet years. For detailed figures an DYR projections for rater supply and use in various regions of the state, see Appendix A. Regional water needs as seen by spokespersons at the Asilomor Conference are summarized on the opening page of each section of the action /impacts charts. Other assuPtiama There is uncertainty and disagreement not only about such unknowns as future water use requiremants in various regions of California, but even Such Unyible forces no weather. A common assumption- -and one aide for purposes of analysis in the action /impact charte - -is that then will be no dramatic change in California's climate. Some scientists, however, expect the global buildup Of ateospheric carbon dioxide (09reaeboute effect') to Significantly affect climate during the next half- cemury or so, possibly reducing precipitation in parts of California and raising the level of the ocean and San Francisco Ray. Some studies of tree rings Indicate that this century represents a relatively wet cycle in long -run patterns of cllost*. on the other hand. recent tree -ring data suggest that the years from 1927 to 1934- -used by the California Department of Water Resources as a base for planning- -were the driest would appear that rthe Department may be offing during ery past conservative best period for its planning. in discussions of water policy, Stich varying assumptions. leading to differences in perceived needs and proposed actions, are inevitable. There is, representevey diff�wt viii tar -at to be willing t &SSLWvthat Calpiforn'a probably has enough water available to meet ail reasonable developmental and environmaatal needs, if it is properly managed. (of course, there is debate over what is 'nasosblr.') For specific assumptions that influence the action /impact charts, see Chapter III. 53 5Y r t{ RESOLUTION No. 88 -IA 1 p t A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF SEE CITY OF RANCHO ° C)CAMMA. CALIFORNIA. SUPPORTING THE 1901 WATER POLICY STATEMENT ADOPTED BY THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES .� :S WHEREAS. on October 6. 1987, the League of California Cities adopted I the Water Policy Statment, which provides a fratevock for California's water future by addressinS the broad water teeda of the entire state; and t, WPYRPAS, this is conaidered to be s keystone document which bridges the differences held in the pact bomacu northern and southern California public ageocisat and WHEREAS, the League of California Cities b" requested that each City to review the statmant and consider its adoption. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby supports the 1987 Water Policy Statmwnr; cod authorises the tranmittal to the League of California Cities. e, 1 �� N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: March 16, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell I1. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Muraaoshi, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the proposed Victoria Street Improvement from Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue and adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. RECDINEIOATIDN• It is hereby recd ended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Victoria Street Improvement and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. BACKGROINNI /ANALYSIS This report presents an Environraental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed victoria Str:et improvement between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above - mentioned improvements. Said improvements generally entail the asphalt concrete overlay, north side curb and gutter, sidewalk installments, cross gutters, etc. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt. Respectfull submitted, Attachment 56 RESOLUTION Nd. 88- 130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVIMO THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED VICTORIA STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM FTIWINDA AVENUE TO EAST AVENUE HHERCAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Victoria Street Improvements; and and IMEREAS, said improvements require an Environmental Assessment; WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been Y prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the EnvirmwenW—Kssssment Initial Study and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Victoria Street Improvement. SECTION 2: The City Clerk Is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuan o e California Environmental Quality Act. S� av r, 6EWRAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY — i ART I For all projects •squiring environeumtal review, this fora must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of thia application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Cowission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and A Negative Daclaratlon will be filed, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: Project Title: Victoria Street Im2rovement Applicant's Hoe, Address, Telephone: City Of Ran rho CurAMnoa. 9320 Base L:,qt Boad Ranrhn Cnrawnga. r.A 91730 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project. Henry Murakoshi, Associate Civil En9ine2r. (714) 989 -1862, Ext. 324 Location of ProjemK: Ytetorta Street from Ettwanda Avenve to East Avenue Assessor's Parce} No.: List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: 6-8 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project: work to he done consists in general of A.C. Overlay, Inst la ling1]dPrAtk<, curb end gilt ters nn north s_1de of th a Mt_ -_ — Leadwav strletna is elsn to he dnrP Acreage of project area add square footage of existing and proposed buildings, If any: Oescribe the envirmnwntal settino of the project site including information onon topography, so s a lity, plants (trees , land animals, any cultural, or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the descripQtion of any existing structures and their use (attach „necessary sheets): _yirtgriA i% err t p•yen rg d %prying the residential community, Etiwanda High School on the north side if Victoria is about 1600' from —East Avenue intersection - residontial houses line north side of the street while south side has partly vacant land and partly residential hones. The street is bordered on the north side with a row of 600 ft of 24. 0 —palm trees from intersection with Ettwanda and some 12' 0 Ash Trees near to the intersection with Pecan Avenue. On south side of the street, it is noted that a row of 1no ft of Eucalyptus trees line up to the intersection with East Avenue. Paved width of the road varies from 11' from centerline to :9' Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative acti0nz, which although individually small, may as a whole hate significant environmental Impact 54 t• PILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ x 2. Create a substantial change In existing noise of produce vibration or glare? _ x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (Police, fire, water. oewage, etc.)? _ .6... 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? X S. Remove any existing trees? How eD manyhnnrnY, 10 6. Create the need for use or diipoival10 pole ttetlys) hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammnabies or explosives? _ .'L Explanation of any YES answers al-ve (attach additional shoots tf necessary): The trees and tree stumps will have to he removed to construct transitions /turn outs at the itnersection of Victoria St and East Ave. 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project:_ 9. Estimate the amount of grading (tutting and filling) required for this project, In cubic ya•ds: 10. If the project Involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATI0N: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and In the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning 0ivision. Oats: i SY Signature %5( �r Title AEsociate Civil Engineer bO RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION %t The following information should be provided to tht City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development: Developers are required to secure letters from the school district for act,-- sodating the increased number of students prior to Issuance of building permits. ` 5 Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. Specific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Humber of single family units: 2. Humber of dultiple — family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model# and # of Tentative 5. groans Price Rance n,4,1y 0 . n. 7 U • 0217 OF &MCHO COT:A.•lONCA PART II - INITIAL STUDY EHVIRONHENTAL CfIEORtISr DATE: APPLICiLM City of Rnnr_h_e Curawng, PILLS: DATE? yOC MINER: PROJLCr: yieterlA Street Imerovement PROJECT LOCATIONi From Etfwanda Avo EO East Aye, I. lummoMlL MAL THPACTS (Espi8nation or 811 "yes" and "eaybe" answers Ara required on attached sheets). 1 YES HAYSE NO 1. Soils and Csoloay. Vill the proposal have significant results In: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? x b. Disruptions, displacements, compactiot or burial of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intorvsle7 _ _- x d. The destruction, covering or modifiration of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase In wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site condicons? x f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g °zposure of people or property to geologic hazards arch as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any tLLneral resource? 2. Hv.rcloay. Will the proposal have significant results in: 1 Pate 2 o YES MAYBE 10 W a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams, rivers, or sphesbral strewn channels? x iQ b. Changes In sbsorptlen rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and asnunt of surface water •� rwnaff? = ? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood q watars? �. d, Chant* in thn amount of surface water in any body of cater? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any Lalteration of surface water quality? ht f. on Alterati of grounwater characteristics? d _ A- n% g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, .Y ' either throutn direct addition* Or with- drawals, or through 1ncarferenue with as } aquifer? 4" Quality? ti Qusncltyt x h. The reduction in the aeount of water other- wise available for public watt. supplies? _ x • I. Exposure of people or property to water related haaards such as flooding or seiches? — x 7. Air 92ality. Will the proposal have significant r— results Sot A. Constant or periodic air aesissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? —� x b. Deterioration of eabiaat air quality and /or Interference with the at:aS =ent of applicable air quality standards? c. Altefation of local or region&, cll=tle conditions, a:fmcting air novesent, soisture or taeperatur? d, Bit■ Flora. Will the proposal have significant results To­: a. Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or number Of any sp:cles of plants? — � x b. R&duction of the numbers of any unique. Cara or et langerio species of plants? 103 x 1 YES MAYBE \0 'age 3 e. Introduction of new or disruptive spaelas of Plants into an area? is d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? x Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results In: a. Change in the charactaristics of speclee, lncludiai diversity, distribution, or nuab.ro Of any spaeies of aaiaels? x b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique. rare or endangered spectec of auimals? x C. Intr Wuction of new or disruptive eperlu of anlnsls Into an area, or result in a barrier to the ugration or movemot of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? S. Population. Will the proposal have olgnificant results Ins a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri. bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the huoaa population of an area? x b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create A daeaad for additional housing? 6. Soeio- Etonomie Factors. Will the proposal have slgailSea it mules ins A- Change is local or regional saeio- ecaaoate characteristics, ineluding eeonoaie or ecmercW diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project bsnefielarlas, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Planning Conslders elons. Will the proposal have significant results in? a A substantial alteration of the present or planned land w• o! an area? b. A conflict with any designations objectives, policies, or adopted plans of an, governm.ncal entities? c. An impact upon the Qulalty or Quantity cf existing consumptive or non- consunptive recreational oppertunitiest 1.9 _ x i v I 1 Page t YES ?LlYU 90 g. Tranarortation. Vill the proposal have signafitant reauxts at a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular soveaeot• x b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? x - c. Effects on existing parking facfllties, or damand for new parking? x d. Substantial Impact upon existing transporta- tiem systems? —_ = e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of paopla and /or goods? _ x f. Alterations to or effects on present and Potential water- Lorna, rail, toss transit or air traffic? g. Increases In traffic hazards to motor vehicles. Eicycliata or pedestrians? 9. Cultural g4909atex. Will the proposal have significant rsaults int a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, Paleontological. and /or historical resources? 10. Hea lthi Sahtr. and t/ufaanae Factors. Will the ropofal have significant roSot fat a. Creation of any bealth hazard or potential health hazard? b. Eaysore of penpie to potential health hazards? �_ x e. A risk of ealoofon or releess of hasardouc substancea in the nv-nt of na ucidesc? d. An increase in the number of indiv duals or species cf vector or pathenaganie organisms or the exposure of people to such orpnisms+ e. Increase in existing noise levels? _ x f Eapesure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? L g ibs creation of oblerrionable adore? _ -� X b. An increase im light or gls: s2 3 bEr Page ! YES MAYBE YO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant rssuaca jut a. The obstruction or degradation of am SCenlC vista or view? b. The creation of an aeetb^CSCally offensive after t. A conflict with the nbjattive of designated or Potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public- Services. Will the proposal have • cignlliunt need or pw .11tata", or sltc:aeions to chL followings a. Electric Power? b. Natural or packaged gas? C. Ooaaunicatlons system? d. Water rupply? e. WASCeWAter facllltfesT X. f. Flood control structures? S. Solid waste fet111ties? h. Fire protactiont 1. Police protection? — -- JL 1. Schools? k. Parks or other ranraaticnat facilities? 14 Naltstenanca of public facilities, Including — � x a. flo road" &od control faailltle"? •. Other governmental services? 13. Enem aid Scarce Peeourcat. Will the proposal have significant results a. Use of substantial or "costive fuel or saerby? b. Substantial Increase in damand upon ex!sting sources of energy? C. An Increase In the daacnd for developoent of X- new sources of ancrgy? d. An increase or parpetuaclon of the ConsUMption of non- renevable fotcs of energy, when feasible renewable courtsa of nargy are available? 6 — - = Page ! i pat. d YE.; _.tYSE YO o. Substantial depletion of any noarauavable or Starts natural resource? 16. Mandatory Findings of Sienificance. ' a. Doss the project have the potential to degrade 04 quality of the onviroaeot, subarsntially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife specieo, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels.. threaten to eliminate a plant or tulael'cm.Ity, reduce the lumbar or reserlct the range of a rare or radaagered plat or aimal or ellaleau lyortaat esaaplae of the major jerlods of California history or prehistory? b. Doe tho project have the potential to achieve short -ttra, to ths.diaadvastegs of long -caa, anyiro�rattl 80918? (A short -test, Sapaec on tat eayir:ent fa one which occurs in R. relatively briefr, definitive period of tier while Iona- - term Sap9cta will endure well Into the future). c. Does the project have Septets which are individually lWted, but cumulatively considerable? (Ctaulattvsly considerable ne9na that the Incremental effects of a individual project are considerable when viewed It' connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). e. Does the praject have envimo.atal effects whit! will cause substantial adverse effects on husem beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OF l.:OIROMM 7JI. I~?1LUA720N the above questions plus a discussion of (proposed nici tion Masora.). Page 7 III. DETER.YINATION _ S On the basis of this initial &valuation: M1. O I lfod the proposed project CODID NOT have a ognificant effect , t an the environment, and &CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed projtcr -could have a eiRnificanc , effect on the eavlroneent; there will not be a significant efLat In this case bau7re the mitigation measures das2ribed on an attached shoot have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE, F DECLARATION VILL DE PF"AREO. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect an the envlr®ent, and an ENV RO-MM MPALT EMIT is required. " Date „j_ 2_KB �ao Lys _ , Signaeura i M Associate Civil Enotneer " Title C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager �1 FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Quitclaiming of Lot B, Tract No. 12942, located within the Caryn Planned Community to Kaufman and Broad Land Company RECOMI DAT10N: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering quitclaiming of the subject City property to Kaufman and Broad Land Company, authorizing the Mayor it -ecute a Quitclaim Deed on behalf of the City, and authorizing the City Clerk to certify the passage and adoption of this resolution and to cause a certified copy of same to be recorded in the office of the Crunty Recorder. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS At the time of recordation of Tract No. 12942, located within the Caryn Planned Community, Lot B was dedicated to the City in fee simple. The dedication was made to the City with the Intention of Its future abandonment by the City to provide access to Pinnacle Peak Court to benefit Lots 9 and 10 of Tentative Tract No. 13563, all to cxyliance with the master plan of the Caryn Planned Community. When quitclaimed by the City, Lot B will be incorporated in the final map of Tract No. 13563. Public access from Pinacle Peak Court to the pedestrian green way within Tract No. 13563 will be provided on the final map of said tract. Respectful bmitted, RHMME :dlw Attachments b9 RESOLUTION NO. ?9- 10 0- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIGA, CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE QUITCLAIMED LOT B. TRACT NO. 1 ?942 WHEREAS, Lot B of Tract No. 12942, as per map recorded in Book 187, pages 62 through 66, inclusive, of the office of County Recorder of San Bernardino County, was dedicated to the City in fee simple for landscape purposes; and WHEREAS, to order to provide access to the public streets for the benefit of Lots 9 and 10 within Tentative Tract No. 13563, located within the Caryn Planned Community, said Lot B is to be quitclaimed; and WHEREAS. said quitclaimed Lot 8 is to be incorporated in the final map of Tract No. 13563, being subdivided by Kaufman and Broad La.:d Company, a California Corporation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds, from all the evidence submi•te t�l— W&t Lot 8 of Tract No. 12942 is unnecessary for pre ^ent or future landscape purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order quitclaiming said Lot B, which has been further described in a legal description and a map which are attached hereto, marked Exhibit •A` and 080, and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2: The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a Corporation Quitclaim ee on behalf of the City to remise, release and quitclaim said lot as specified above to Kaufman and Broad Land Company, a California Corporation. SPCTION 3• The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution —io Ee recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTIJN 4: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this reso�ion.'and It shall thereupon take effect and be in force. ()0 P Aeoeeawe aeee�rw n CSt7 of R.arbo Clump P.O. Rp ed7 Ranee Ctmap. G 917" r rrww.ww 'w L 1 HAOe ACalewee tt7a leeeCOAeweVK �� wwwrrrr��wrrw. w+�.wow.trsw..riw w wt -I Corpo L o Maim Dftd FOR VALU.VLR COMMIMATION, nnlpt o(.bkk k yny ft ae.wtpd,_ TL Ck7 at Raako cic� S corporation ordenited ender the tan Of UN State of CallfWAle. per Cltr toad) Rnelutlon hereby dERISES. AILEASES QTY- MCLAIRS to A.u6wn and erwd L.nd Ca ," IhO take* dm mW �Y W Ck7 of Rancho CLoaye Coran^t Sr Mond". Srw of Se. Eahlblt "A, .nd ..S" MY OF "ACM LLCWaGA enn s u , qor Af7E57- Car 7 u e f. y ere Adsduot parcel No. '71 .,.,...... _,.«. 1 w _ 3+ L• Jr Y �n y'! " LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot R, Tract 129 42 an shown on Map recorded in Rook 187 pages 62 thmugh 66, Records of SanRernardino County, T State of California. ., Containing 531.33 square fast more or less w n L U Fto N0. 1132 OF Cµ•�F� Exhl Lit "A" e � R: :le 0 1:2 12 n r m 'o n 0 IC 1� r- 0 a �o M -w m � 1�NQ N -c A 0 z � t 0 V O Sw O s w 1 Lam— z -3nn!mm-- v s Date: To: From: By: Subject: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 16, IR8 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer John L. Martin Approval of Contract Change Order No. 3 Engineers in the mount of $4,700.00 for Reconstruction project between Malachite Archibald Avenue for design of a Master Plann to be psid from Systems Development Fees, contract total to $22,054.53. RECONENDATION: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 3 to Assccia amount of $4,700.00 for Hillside Road Reconstruc Malachite Avenue and Archibald Avenue for design Store Drain to be paid from Systems Development contract total to $22,054.53. BACKGRODMD /ANALYSIS: The subject project was approve Associated Engineers as :he Engir of reconstructing and vioening the Storm Drain installation. Howeve based on a 25 year event. Since the City, a revision of criterion for Master Planned Storm Drains delayed the project, it was del raJesigned, to current standards, redesign should take 2 weeks and for tle April 10th agenda. Respect u submitted, RHM:JLM:pam Attachment fu sign on April 17, .ric, esign Consultant. Tt oadway also included a Maste the storm drain sizing crit he design and subsequent ap s adopted to cos idcr n 100 y lice several right -of -way is ed that the store drain : •tar to a request to seek b request to seek bids should ?y In was al by event have Id be The ready CITY OF RANCIN) CUCAMOMCA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANCE ORDER )side Road Improvements TO: —113-5 You are hereby requested to engineering services. comply with the following changes from the agreement for in Contract Price In Contact Price Design a 100 year event storm dram for Hillside Road between Malachite Avenue dnd Archibald Avenue $4,700.00 TOTAL $4,700.00 Previous design criteria used when anginal contract was signed was a 25 year event. This has proved inconsistant with the drainage fee established for the City and iS unacceptable to handle drainage flows. Further, the existing drainage structure east of Archibald is substandard and scheduled for replacement. Therefore, a new design and area review is needed to prepare for and provide adequate storm water protection. The amount of the Contract will be (Decreased) (Increased) by the sum of: Four Thousand Seven Hundred and no /100 Dollars (54,700.00 The Contract Total Including this and previous Change Orders will be: Twent TwoThaucend Fifty Four Do Pars and 53/100 Dollars rd Orders (ll be The Contract period provided for completion will be (Incr•eased)(Decreased) (Unchanged) 10 Days This document will become a {element to the Contract and all hereto. provisions will apply Requested: r ...� t 3/ „9- u agu er }e Accepted- a e n near Approved: a yor, y o anc a ucamonga agreement dated: CO R5 -42 April X17, iS t,iTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: March 16, 198B - City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire. City Engineer By: Gideon V. Agra, Jr. Civil Engineer Subject: Approval to Release the Real Property and Lien Agreement between the City of Gilbert M. Ceballos and Barbara J. latter's compliance of the payment aforesaid contract RECOPMOATION: Improvement Contract Rancho Cucamonga and Ceballos upon the stipulated in the It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Release of Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Gilbert M. Ceballos and Barbara J. Ceballos, upon the latter's compliance of the payment stipulated in the aforesaid contract. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS: On April 17, 1986, a Lien Agreement was executed between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and spouses Gilbert M. and Barbara J. Ceballos, related to the Archibald Avenue reconstruction between Lemon Avenue and Banyan Avenue. The City provided construction of public improvements along the property frontage of APN 201 - 251 -23 which caused the cost of construction to become a lien against the property on August 19, 1986, Document No. 86- 236774, recorded in Official Records of the County of San Bernardino. The full payment of $1,206.00 received as a balance due on March 4, 1988, will make the Lien Agreement no longer required and such compliance shall cause the City to initiate a "Notice of Release of Lien* to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San. Bernardino County. 0.espec tied, RN4. ` Attachment "1(0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY ANU WHEN RECDRDEO WAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RAKW CUCAMON;A P. 0. BOX 807 RANCHO CUCAIDOGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 _ NOTICE OF RELEASE OF LIEN LP: notice be given that the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby release its lien which it had caused to be recorded on the land hereinafter more fully ' described, said iten having been placed thereon by the recording of a contract between the City of Ranch Cucamonga and Gilbert N. Ceballos and Barbara J. ;< Ceballos dated April 17. 1986 and recorded August 19, 1986 as Document No. ° 86- 236774, Recorded in Official Records, San Bernardino County, State of California. The description of the land is as follows: North 70 feet of South 262 feet of the Nest one -half of Lot 29. Foothill Frostless Fruit Comp,ny Subdivision No. 2, County of San Bernardino, Book 20, Page 34 of Naps; AKA 6255 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. CITY (IF RANCHO CUCAMM, CALIFORNIA. a municipal corporation BY, Dennis L. SMUT.-Wy-or STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) as CO(KrY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On ,19 ,before me, the undersigned, a Notary Pub c n an or safd-rtate, personally appeared Dennis L. Stout, personally known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument as Mayor on behalf of said municipal corporation, therein named, and acknowledged to me that such municipai corporation executed the same. my hand and official sea X=ry DuMlr in and fo= eaiA State -77 CYdiCdIROCO►T r (114) 989IR' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post office Sax 8117 9320-C Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga. Cahtomla 91730 RS RO— T -- WfCIMfd 111(Vfl wbi'tID— 1 /OlW alxJ��Yp M1iYrli— _ .. hIYnLV R10wJ 99APIf h1.w.R0' Nltf f! T9i1 m9 R++lio.' - -T�— n9a na -- :eEa'�hcwfrii w 9iN �9ri F::hcr.orip- P!R' TO —jI rZ 7—P — .191U 9]LT _I�1i �1�1�� w Mlh.9 nOVTF3w'Y M+tNn �tfAE;wci - •39ot -4601 3..mq._I�d1_.li�,_��,,,.� d55 wLCQti� R.CNCIt4imDM .... TOIA� 49 -� 645 �k - °1 i '18 RESOLUTION N0. '9$-131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhOHGA, L'' IFptNIA. RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY I 0 1j CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM GILBERT M. CEBALLOS AHD BARBAgt J. CEBALLOS adopted R Agreement 86-105taccepting a Real ProF r yRImprovementtContract and Lien Agreement from Gilbert M. Ceballos and Barbara J. Ceballos; and Agreement we; re recorded intOfficial Reeccordslo San�BeernardtnocCauny, ten California, on August 19, 1986, as Docugent No. n Bernardi and longer requiredR� said peal property Contrail and Lien Agreement is no of Rancho Cucamonga Tdd000esFherebyEreleaseasaaiidd peal proP`rtY Improvementthe Cijy Contract and Lien Agreement and that the City Clerk shall cause Release of Lien to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. >9 — CITY OF g 1NCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 41 Date: March 16, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell M. Maguire, Cfty Engineer ' By: Paul A. Rou g_au, iraffic Engineer SubJect: Approval to award a contract for consultant services to J. F. Davidson Assocfates, Inc., in tho acaunt of $33,046.00 for design of traffic sfgnal and street improvementr at the Intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. RE_C_. MATIOy It is recommend -•d that a contract for consultant services for the design o traffic signal and street improvements at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue be awarded to J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc., in the amount of $33,046.00 to be funded from 58325/iDA Funds. BACKGR D/�ySIS, The Capital Improvement Program for 1981 -88 includes the design and installation of new traffic signals and appropriate street fmpmymaeand at the Intersection of Foothill Boulevard el Raehestre Avenue. This fork also Includes ion ofcatlon, replacement or installation of drainage facilities, relocation of cation. or utilities and acquisition of right -of -way to accomplish the work. Proposals were received from five consulting firms with the following amounts designated for the different portions of the wo -k: Consultant ROW Acquis iering tion w/o Right-of-Way Total Amount I ROM Ac Ac4ufsitfon J.F Davidson proposed Associates, Inc 046 $33,.00 I Austin-Foust not Included 433,046.00 Associates. Inc 33,800.00 not included 33,800.00 I ASL Consulting Engileers 35,240.00 I not included 35,240.00 M1ildan Associates 41,095 00 $15,852.00 56,948.00 � BSI Consultants, inc 41,868.00 35,100.00 76,968.00 I M ' 7 CCSR Ra: Approval to Award Contract March 16, 1988 Page 2 is evident above, right- of- acquisiton was not included In the three !st proposals, however, each would provide right -o7 -way en7ineertng so a City- supplied right -of -way specialist can appraise and obtain bof -wy using the requisite Caltrans procedures. This alternative preserted in the Request for Proposal to allow proposals from fins luinre engineering background, agents,. n^ce and eayertirse,ather�ropocali ranked in order by the mount designated for all the work exce t for t -of -wayy acqutsltlon. The lowest was J. F. Davidson Associates, for whoa acceptance is recommended. Retpe s Itted, RHM:PAR:pas i a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DMI : larch 2, 1999 TO: Mayor City Council -� FROM: Lauren M. Was e n City Manager SUBJECT: Buy -Back of Cation Ttme Over the last ten years, we had one employee who has act,rmalated an unusually large amount of vacation. The primary mason for this accumulation was that in the early days of the City's history the employee, Rex Whitney, was needed on the job and did not use his vacation. Over the past couple of years, we have been able to work with Rex to reduce the amount of accumulated time. Hoirever, since he is now a ten -year employee the accumulation continues at a highe- rate than previously. In order to reduco the City's long -term financial liability, Jim wart, Administrative So.-vice: Director, has recommended that we buy back a portion of Rex's vacation time. Existing City rolicy allows for accumulation of a maximum of 160 hours. Rex has approximately 542 hours accumulated. In order to bring Rex's vacation total down to the City maximum, we would need to buy- back approximately 302 hours at a cost of $5,570. The City auditn;s have also recommended that we take action to reduce the accumulated hours Scwn to the City maximum. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Courul approve a one time buy -back of vacation time for Rex Whitney at a cost of $5,570. It is ..cognized that Rex is the only employee who has been allowed to exceed the maximum accumulation of vacation time. Funding for this one time appropriation will come from the non - departmental fund which was created for the purpose of paying fur accumulated vacation time at employee termination. Before we put 1:10: on the City Council agenda, I would like to make certain that all the Councilmembers understand the uniqueness of the issue and that you support it Assuming that there is support for this concept, we will place the matter on future consent calendar for Council action. I have not previously mentioned it, but the City Engineer also concurs with the recommendation since it is not feasible to allow Rex thu accumulated hour off without affecting the City's work prog mms p,east let us know how you feel within the nex, week or so, so that this item can be SOEduled for the earliest City Council agenda. INW lr cc Robert Rizzo Jim Hart $), i .1 11 '_ tI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAiONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: February 29, 1988 TO: urn Wasserman, city 1Lnager FROM: 1m Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: BUY -BACK OF REX WHITNEY'S VACATION TIME As you are aware, when the City incorporated, Rex Whitney was an employee of CSA 50 and automatically brought over, as a City employee, his accrued vacation time. As a result. Rex had several unused vacation hours when he became an employee. During the first several years of the City's existence, Rex was in essence the only mainteneuce employee. and not capable of utilizing his past vacation as well as any vacation he was accruing. The result has been that Rex has accumulated an excessive amount of vacation time that he will not be able to use. Pubis, Works has allowed Rex time off to reduce his vacation amount, however, due to the on -going work load, Rex has not been able to take enough time off. The City's policy allows for vacation accrual to a maximum of 160 hours. Rex currently has 542 accumulated hours and accrues vacation at a rate of 5.538 hours per pay period. My recommendation, and the recommendation of the department head, is to initiate a one time buy -back of vacation time from Rey, as an emergency measure, and ensure he uses vacation time In accordance with city policy to the future so he does not begin to accrue more time. To bring Rex to 160 hours, the City would need to buy approximately 382 hours. His current hourly rate of pay it $14.56, bringing the total buy -back to approximately SS,570. Based on the City auditors recommendation, the city annually budgets a contingency of funds to cover our unfunded liability for vacation. Funds are available in this account to pay the cost of Rex's buy -back. Please let me know if you concur with the recommendation. JH:cv 73 v — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhIONGA Lc; STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Junior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids" for the Archibald Avenue Entry Monuments Improvement Protect, located on the northeast and northwest corners of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street, to be funded from Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, account number 40- 4130 -8767 RECOFMCATION: L It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Archibald Avenue Entry Monuments Improvement project and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the 'Notice Inviting Bids.- Background /Analysis The subject protect plans and specifications have been cenpleted by the Forma Group, Incorporated, reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction Is $123,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for March 21 and 28, I988, with the bid opening at 2:00 P.N. on Wednesday. April 6, 198C. Respectful 14 submitted, 7 � cc: Purchasing $q RESOLUTION NO. 79- 13a-- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE *ARCHIBALD AVENUE ENTRY MONUMENTS ", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spcifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Archibald Avenue Entry Monuments ". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the f- )llowing words and figures, to wit: *NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San B rnardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN :hat the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 6th day of April 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the 'Archibald Avenue Entry Monuments" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Archibald Avenue Entry Monuments'. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character In the locality In which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per then wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per d'3n wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the ,fob site. X05 RESOLUTION PAGE 2 The Contractor shalt forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollare ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the wnrk. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any app- enticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of Lae public works protect and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract The ratio of apprentices to ,journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the ,joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 0. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered aPPentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight ,journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contrihutions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or ,journeymen in cny apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the Public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. 0 RESOLUTION PAG= 3 Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California haying to dm with working hours as set 7orth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 if the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penattj to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under I,im, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic 1s required or permitted to labor more than eight (8f hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each worlwan needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements f led In accordance with Labor Lode Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal, to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's chick, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be appl ad by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additiunal bond In an amount equal to fifty percent (505) of the contract price for said work shall be given to .ecure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. V) RESOLUTION PAGE 4 No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall Possess a Class W License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Ousiness and Professions Code, Section 70DO et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance wf,h the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file 1n the Office of the the PlansClerk and specifications will be furnished upon,aCalifornia. Copies City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $20.00, said 320.00 application to the City of 1s nonrefundable. Will be Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications together when said 315,Opitolcoverathe cost Of mailing charges and (aerhead. The successful bloder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the re�virements of Section of the General 902 Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifics 902 regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject and and all bids. By order of the Council Of the City of Rancho Cuc monga, California. Dated this day of PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of California, this day o9 the City of Rancho Cucamonga, — 19 ATTEST; y er — ilayor sa i a z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 T0: City Council snd City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY. Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer Cj-,/- SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Arrow Route Reconstruction, Phase I Improvement Project, located between Turner Avenue and Archibald Avenue on the north side, awarded to Fontana Paving, Incorporated, for the amount of $243,900.00 to be funded from the Systems Fund, account nuuber 22- 4637 -8735. It is recommded that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clark to execute the contract documents for the Arrow Route Reconstruction, Phase I Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services director to expend $270,000.00 ($243,900.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Systems Fund. Background /Analysis on March 2, 1988, City Council awarded the sub3e:t pro?ect to Fontana Paving, Incorporated. Staff has received "ror Fot ;�ana Paving, Incorpo -ated, executed contract documents, bonds &A insurance uocuments; reviewed then and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Respect y submitted, r cc: Purchasing m CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire. City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map. Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 10782 (OR 87 -26), located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue. submitted by Watson Land Company RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Nap 10782 accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Parcel Map 10782, located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, in the General Industrial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on September 9, 1987, for the division of 31 acres into 13 parcels. The Developer, Watson Land Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $836,000 Labor and Material Bond: $418,000 Monumentation: $ 3,150 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. A Reciprical Access and Maintenance Agreement has also been approved by the City Attorney. Resp f i �bmitt¢d, RM : :sd Attachments •a 4 � RESOLUTION NO-n- 133 x �?• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ' CUCAIWNGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER. 10782, r (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10782), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, x; AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY £r $' WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Nap Na. 10702, submitted by Watson Land Company, and consisting of 13 parcels, located on the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue eSerr9. 19 7 d the Planning Commission of the City of Pan Cho Cucamonga oneptemb WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 10782 is the final map of the division rf 1 land approved as sham on said Tentative Parcel Map: and A WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final Map by the City Council of said City have now been me by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable I mprovement Security by Watson Land Company as develq,er. ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of to City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby o proved the City ofsRanchay0ucamongaedand Shen CStydClerk to attest. and Parcel authorized t 10IF82 be and sae the to the CountyrRecorderot dbenfil2d for record. 71 ssow Rom pw4C&L i�Reec' � ieRUts�.. IAfACCL � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIIEER NG DIVISON /A ,gCe4 // r�acrc rrrr.e. PM r 0-rez Q7% 3 �!t r. — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell 11. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Maps, Improvement Agreements and Imorovement Security for Tracts 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561, 13563 and 12643, boundeu on the north and south by the extension of Banyan Street and Highland Avenue and bounded on the east and west by rochester Avenue and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Marlborough Development Corporation and Kaufman and Broad RECOMMENDATION It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tracts 13555, 13556, 15558, 13560, 13561, 13563 and 12643, accepting the subject agreements and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said maps to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Tracts 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561, 13563 and 12643, bounded on the north and south by the extension of Panyan Street and Highland Avenue and bounded east and west by Rochester Avenue and Milliken Avenue, in the Caryn Planned Community, were apr iP.d by the Planning Commission on February 20, 1985, as follows: Tract No. Acres Lots 1e355 11.24 47 13556 10.06 40 13558 11.20 52 13560 4.07 23 13561 7.44 43 13563 6.60 43 12643 8.67 50 93 ff CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MARCH 16, 1988 PAGE 2 U1 Marborough Development Corporation is submitting agreements end security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: j, Tract Faith /Perform Labor /Material Monumentation No. Bond Bond Bond 13555 $133,000 $66,500 $4,750 ` 13556 128,000 64,000 4,400 13558 145,000 72,500 5,000 13560 65,000 32,500 _ 3,550 13561 103,000 51,500 4,550 13563 112,000 56,000 4,600 12643 110,000 59,000 4,850,., Copies of the agreements and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. + Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. CC&R's have been • approved for Tracts 13560, 13561 and 13563. Resp 1 witted, l R :LB: Attachments U1 RESOLUTION NU. 9- V VA Ste` A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RARCHO {� CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, 7 IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 13555, b' 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561, 13563 AND 12643 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13555, consisting of 47 lots, Tentative Map of Tract 13556, consisting of 40 lots, Tentative Map of Tract 13558, consisting of 52 lots, Tentative Map of Tract 13560, consisting of 23 lots, Tentative Map of Tract 13561, consisting of 43 lots, Tentative Hap of Tract 13563, consisting of 43 lots and Tentative Map of Tract 12643, consisting of 50 lots, submitted by Marborough Development Corporation and Kaufman and Broad, Subdividers, bounded on the north and south by the extension of Banyan Street and Highland Avenue and bowded on the east and west by Rochester Avenue and Milliken Avenue, have been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdividers for approval by said City as provided to the Subdivltlan Map Act of the State of Culifnrnla, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Maps of said Tracts, Marlborough Development Corporation and Kaufman and Broad have offered the Improvement Agreements submitted herewith for approval and execution by sa1C City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submit for approval said Final Maps offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. C MOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council oS the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreements be and the sane are r. approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk 1s authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Maps delineating same be approved and the City Clerk 1s authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. M -- CITY RANCHO CUCAMCNGA STAFF REPORT DUE: March 16, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUDJECT: Approval of Parcel Wp 9350, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Raad and Milliken Avenue, submitted by The William Lyon Company RECdi/EMI'lOi1 It is recousended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 9350 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause sacra to record. Analysis /Background Parcel Ma 9350 was approved by the Planning Cowlssfon on Noveiober 27, 1905, for the division of 103.34 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Victoria Planned Community, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue. improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit issuance. Resp y sobmitte� RHM Attachments 6 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9350 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9350) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Nueher 9350, submitted by The William Lyon Coopany and consisting 'of 4 parcels, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission of 4` the City uy Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel•Map Mustier 9350 is the final rap of the division -of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requlreaents established as prerequisite to approval of the final xp by the City Council of said City have now been met. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of — Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Nuaber 940 be and the sane is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to tho County Recorder to bo filed for record. J r� b 'z C m 1� HIC,HLANO AVENUE 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M 1 A �it i S.P. RAVL. E � 2 Iz •� Y, r BASELfNE KOAO C m 0 M: N Tina. PPP 93s© mil: N CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Korks Inspec Z SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion tECOMEiMTTON: The required street lmproveeents for CUP 84 -37 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said Improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance bond tp the amount of $215,000.00. Background /Analysis CUP 84 -37 - located at the notheast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue DEVELOPER: Deer Creek Car Wash 10340 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $215,000.00 Res V y submitted, FM :SMG:sjm Attachment /00 n 1ir3 , RESOLUTION No. gg-13` t A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCba N CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING T14E PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 81_37 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TM WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 84 -37 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion Is required to be filed, certifying { the work complete. ,;' NOW, THEPEFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorizad to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. v Y V M 4 � VV r C11Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. 10guire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspectp t a SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completions RECOM EIOATION: The required street improvements for DR 85-02 have been completed in an acceptable anrer and it 1s recommended teat City Council accept said Inrovexnts, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Perforaznce Bond in the amount of $24,950. Background /Analysis OR 85 -02 - located on the northwest corner of Forthill Boulevard and Hallman Avenue. DEVELOPER: Pep -Boys of California P.O. Box 15606/1122 N. Washington Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90015 Release: Faithful Perforance Bond (Street) $24,850 Respe 1 itted, r RRM:SMG:jh Attachment 101 RESOLNTION NO. ES-137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IRE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 85 -02 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 85 -02 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer 1s euthorl:ud to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. IV /03 t -- .3TY OF 11ANCHO CUCAMONGA ,. STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16,1988 g TO: City Council and City Manager FROir: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. 6111ilind, Public Works Inspeciy SUCJECT: Relecse of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMEiOATIOM: The required street improvements for Parcel Map 9481 have been completed In an acceptable manner and it is !»;M—endad that City Council accept. said improvewnts, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Deal in tte amount of $106,000. Background /Analysis Parcel Map 9481 - located on the Northeast corner of 7th Street and Hellman Avenue Release: DCVELOPER: Golden West Equity Properties 1949 South State College Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92806 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $106,000.00 RespectkNy submitted, •8 :�h Attachment ioy K i RESOLUTION N0,�8-138 A RESOLU`rtN'OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITf OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.,CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYEKXTS FOR PARCEL MAP 9481 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOk THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of publ4c improvements for Parcoi Kip 9481 have been completed so the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion 1s required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the worst 1s hereby accepted an: the C1t;y Engineer is authorized to sign and file .a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ios R ■t, — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: larch 16, 1988, ' , i TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspec SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion IB:COIBB' UT10M: ` The required street improvements for CUP 85 -12 have been,co pleted in an acceptable sinner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $27,000. Background /Analysis CUP 85 -12 - located on the north side of Church Street, east of Archibald Avenue DEVELOPER: Kingdom Ilall of Jehovah's Witnesses 7670 Paradise Place Rcncho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Certificate of Deposit (Street) $27,000 ?Respec u ttted, G:sd Attachment 106 „W RESIX.UTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 85 -12 AND AUTHORiZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE YORK f NNEPW, the construction of public improvements for CUP 85 -12 have been completed to the satisfaction of tha City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authortied to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 5 I r -7L/-- /0') CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of a Subordination Agreement for Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 8063, located on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue, submitted by Foothill /Hellman Investuant, Limited RECONIEMDATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Subordination Agreement submitted by Foothill /Hellman Investment, Limited, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same and cause the agreement to record. Background /Analysis A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was accepted by the City Council and recorded on April 8, 1985, as document Ito. 85- 081627 in the official Records of San Bernardino County, State of California for construction of 112 the median island on Foothill Boulevard adjacent to Parcel Map 8063. In order to secure financing for hit project, the lender requires that the subject Lien Agreement be subordinated to liens in favor of the lender. Foothill /Hellman Investment, Limited, has submitted the attached Subordination Agreement for City Council approval. Respectfu I submi "ed, RHM: sd Attachment /07 CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WYWON /09 RESOLUTION NO. n 1 40 _ r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM FOOTHILL /HELLMAN INVESTMENT, LIMITED, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME 1 A ti e WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the installation of off -site improvements, including 1(2 r the median island on Foothill Boulevard, was approved by City Council and recorded on April 18, 1965, as document No. 85- 081627 in the official Records of San Bernardino County, State of California; and ref' WHEREAS, for the developer to secure financing for the project. Y the lender requires that the aoove- mentioned lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and S WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordinate Agreement'to- that effect for the City's approval and execution. - dOW, THERCFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Subordinate Agreement he and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign >' said Subordination Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest thereto. 1 A ti e W+ 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' STAFF REPORTiE DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackott, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Drainage Acceptance Agreement for OR 87 -21, located on the south side of Sixth Street, approximately 407 feet west of Lucas Ranch Road, submitted by Andrew. Bruce and Jana Barmakian RECOMI£ OAT10M: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attachrd resolution accepting the subject Drainage Acceptance Agreement, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Background /Analysis The Sixth Street Marehob•e Project referred to as OR 87 -21 is located on the south side of Sixth Street, approximately 487 feet from Lucas Ranch Road The Developer, The Barmakian Company, is submitting a Drainage Acceptance Agreement for the acceptance of public drainage water discharged from Sixth Street which occurs in front of their project on Sixth Street. Respectful,ly submitted, :sd Attachment /I/ RESOLUTION NO. n- (y( A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -21 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Drainage Acceptance Agreement' executed on March 8, 1988, by Andrew, Bruce and Jana Barmakian as developers for the acceptance of public drainage water discharged from Sixth Street which occurs in front of the Sixth Street Warehouse Project (OR 87 -21) and is located south of Sixth Street and approximately 487 feet west of Lucas Ranch Road; and _ WHEREAS, the said drainage agreement agrees to maintain drainage facilities within real property specifically described yithin said agreement as may be required by the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, said agreement agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga from any drainage to said real property and all other affected properties arising from said public drainage. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Drainage Acceptance agreement is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said Agreement to record. //.2-. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March +6, 1988 TO, Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM, Robert A Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B Fulwood, Resource Center Coordinator SUAJECT: Approval of Resolution Passing on RoapportiFumont Report for the Storm Drain Channel ( Assessment District 86 -2) for the Lot Line Adjustment for AP11 201 - 271 -71 APN 201 - 271 -72, and Tract Mao 12873, giving Preliminary Approval, and setting the date of Public Hearing for April 20, 1988. Approval of Resolution Passing on Reappoationment Report for the Storm Drain Channel ( Assessment Distr.ct 86 -2) for the Lot Line Adjustment for APN 201- 271 -71, "N 201- 271 -72, and Tract Map 12873, giving Preliminary Approval, and setting the date of Public Hearing for April 20, 1988 £VALUATION. During fisca_ year 1987/88 a property stbdivijion occurred within the Storm Drain Channel (Assessment District 86 -21 This has necessitated the reapportionment of unpaid assessments on subdivided properties The Resolution Passing on Reapportionment ReiozL preliminarily approves the Reapportionment Report and lets the time and place for the Public Hearing for April 20, '188 at 7:30 p m at the Lions Park Community Center, Ranc.jn Cucamonga, California Respectfully submitted, Robert izzo Assist City Manager RAR:JBF:sgr Attachment, Resolution Passing on Reapportionment Report ris RESOLUTION NO Sg" Iy e1+ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PASSING ON REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT FOR THE STORM DRAIN CHANNEL (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86 -2) FOR THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR AeN 201- 271 -71, APN t 201- 271 -72, AND TRACT MAP 12873, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING THE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR APRIL 20, 1988. W. EREA5, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously confirmed assessments In a special ani,acsment "strict, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the 'Municipal Improvement Act of 19131, being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and bonds were issued to represent the costs for unpaid a�,essments yursuant to the terms and provisions of the 01m,,rcvemont Bond Act of 1915•, being Division 10 of said code, said special assessment district known and designated as Assessment District 86 -2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District -) and, WHEREAS, subsequent thereto, certain lots and /or parcels o£ -land which there are unpaid assessments have been apportioned or dividedl and this legislative body has ordered the preparation of and has now received a -Reapportionment Report" lotting forth the segregation and apportionment of the unpaid installments of the original assyssments, all as authorized by Part 10 of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 specifically commencing with Section 9730 thereof: and, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2 That the report entitled -Reapportionment Report- setting forth certain segragaclons and apportionments of the unpaid Installments of the original Lssessments for the Assessment District is hereby received, proliminnrily approved and ordered to be placed un file In the Office of the City Clerk of the legislative body SECTION J That the proposed segregations and apportionments as sot forth in the Reapportionment Report, are hereby approved in the amounts set forth and for the respective lots Lr parcels as sot forth in said report Reference is hereby made to said report for all particulars as it relates to the proposed segregations and reapportionments fly CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION APN 201- 271 -71, 72 G TM 12873 tlarch '6, 1988 Page 2 SECTION 4. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH OF APRIL 1988, AT THE HOUR OF 7t3O P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY, LOCATED AT THE LIONS PArK COMMUNITY CENTER, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED FOR THE HEARING UPON THE PROPOSED AMENDED ASSESSMENTS. ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT OR IN THE LANDS AFFECTED THEREBY, OR IN THE BONDS SECURED THEE =BY, MAY, AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING OR AT THE TIME TO WHICH THE HEARING MAY BE CONTINUED, APPEAR AND PROTEST AGAINST THE AMENDED ASSESSMENT WRITTEN OBJECTIONS TO THE AMENDED ASSESSMENT ARE TO BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERIC OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY BY ANY INTERESTED PERSON AT ANY TIML' NOT LATER THAN THE TIME SET FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECTION S / 4 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 16, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Enginaer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide a .OBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13568 .3560, 13561, 13563, DR 87 -11, Dr. 87 -26 and Parcel Map 9355 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 40 and setting the date of public hearing for April 20, 1988 REGIMENOATION It is recommended that City Council adapt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 40 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Street lighting Maintenance District No. 1. Anal sis Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's Intent to annex Tract Nos. 12643, 13555, 13596, 13558, 13500, 13561, 13563, DR 87 -11, OR 87 -26 and Parcel Map 9350 to Street Lighting Main enance District No. 1 as Annexation 40 and setting the public hearing date for April 20, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers request ng the subject annexation are an file In the Engineering Division. Res c 1 ubmi tied, Attachments //% RESOLUTION N0. $S- 1 `f 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 40 TO STREET LIGhTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, on March 16, 1908, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council hoc duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report-is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o s�fd work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descred—in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa aT Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and con imed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for TFe purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district AA in CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No Annexation No. 40 for Tract Nos. 12643 13555 13556 13558, 13560, 13561, 13563 OR 87 -11, DR 87 -26 and Parcel Map 9350 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots wlt.iin said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services anu materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arte•iai and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file Yith the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shali be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or developnent plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the Individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district Incl-*de: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the 111uminat`an of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs i Na costs will be incurred for rtreet lighting Improvement • construction. All improvements � iI be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it 1s estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as Indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be used on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated 'nto two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on malar streets for residential improvements (single family, multi- family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 It comprised of all industrial, commercial and institL:innal projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in Industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the name benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. l is shown below: S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: *Nigh Pressure Sodium vapor Total No. of Lamps Lamp Size Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp 04ze* YTO No. 40 Total X S 8.93 X 12 5800L .•.. 0 444 9500L 485 14 499 16,000L 16 0 16 22,000L 4 0 4 27,500L 16 1 17 *Nigh Pressure Sodium vapor 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 16,245 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 571 Total Assessment Units 16,816 Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate I,o's Maint. Cost 5800L 444 X S 8.93 X 12 S 47,579.04 9500L 499 X $10.16 X 12 60,838.08 16,000L 16 X $12.08 X 12 2,319.36 22,000L 4 X 513.84 X 12 664.32 27,500 17 X $15.31 X 12 3,123.24 Total Annual Maint. Cost S114,124.04 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 16,245 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 571 Total Assessment Units 16,816 E I 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost S114 524.04 56.81 /year /unit No. o n a n s r� — Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6, SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled 'Street lighting Maintenance District No. 19, Annexation No. 40. Tnese diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment. Improvements for the District are found to �e of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per „_ ._ net ucre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2 City Council adopts Resolution of intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testfimny and determines to form a District or abandon the proce ings. 4. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. ■ hNR �4 EXHIBIT "A• Properties and improvecents to be included within Annexation No. 40 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1; i '} Assess. No. of L s to be Annexed Project Acreage -Unite c , �• — ' Zone 1 ;. Tract 12643 49 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 13555 47 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 13556 40 - -- - -- -- -- - -- ,� 13558 52 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 13560 23 --- --- --- --- --- w 13561 43 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- f 13563 44 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- DR 87 -11 5 - -- 1 - -- - -- - -- Parcel Map 9350 pcl 1 44.9 90 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- Pcl 2 24.0 48 - - -- - -- pcl 3 34.2 68 Total 509 - -- 1 - -- - -- - -- Zone 2 DR 87 -26 y (PH 10782) pcl 1 1.8 4 - -- 13 - -- - -- 1 pci 2 1.6 3 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- pcl 3 2.3 5 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- pct 4 2.6 5 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- Pcl 5 2.1 4 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- pc1 G 1.9 4 - -- - -- -- - -- - -- pcl 7 1.5 3 -•- - -- -- -- - -- t'• pci 8 2.3 5 - - - -- - -- - -- - -- pcl 9 2.2 4 - - -- - -- - -- - -- pcl 10 2.5 5 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- pcl 11 4 6 9 - -- -•- - -- - -- - -- pcl 12 2.8 6 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- pcl 13 2.3 5 _ _ Total 30.5 L2 - -- 13 - -- - -- 1 571 - -- 14 -•- - -- 1 2 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AMEUTION NO. 40 o� onz St IMIMI41 I'M 1"1441 a 7 IT 20 6 20 12 6 2 4 S 12 14 1f 10 21 22 20 21 22to 20 it = TURF EN GROUND COYER TURF AREA GROUND COYER AREA 0 S.F 30,440 S.F. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. ¢0 TURF GROUND COVER TUR!• AREA 7,275 S.F. GROUND COVER AREA 55,795 S.F. Y^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOKOA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO awl-mim OF CALIFORNIA 6 �TI V. un — ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. ¢0 TURF r3 GROUND COVER TURF AREA 0 S.F. GROUND COVER AREA 48,M S.F. �,�` '•+�,^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA COUNTY OF BAN BMWAnINO STATS OF CAUPORNIA N" i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 40 J 7 ` ` 4 0 S \\ f 10 11 13 13 14 15 is 1y u 20 W y S z• _ 23 u r m 19 29130111/32/33134 /.j rff TURF ® GROUND COVER TURF AREA 2,070 S.F. f7 l f1I W0 41141/47 M „I,il It lu 144 GROUND COVER AREA 71,345 S.F. CITY OF RA.,NCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OR SAN BERNARDINO :: o i sTATE OF CALIFORNIA — N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DIST3ICT NO. I S TURF GROUND COVER ANNEXATION NO. ¢O TURF AREA 4,301 S.F. GROUND COVER AREA 21,%+0 S.F. S,�`• ; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi[ONGA COUNTY OF I3AN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA T Yr ` l� ���� ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. -1 ANNEXATION NO. ¢0 - TURF GROUND COVER TURF AREA 2,030 S.F. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF BAN BERNARDINO STATR OF CALM P.M GROUND COVER AREA 42.660 S.F. N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 40 I4 3I ill P14 s H»motxbb n I o I t7 is TURF TURF AREA GROUND COVER 8,290 S.F. L;--- C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ii 3 - GROUND COVER AREA 9,840 S.F. n N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET ' GHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. ¢0 SUTE WN - C ED L CITY OF RANCHO CUC"OifGA COUNTY OF BAN BMNUDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA - N �iii'� ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. ¢0 ,ewaow soure crz- 4 —� r ,,..,J >J•w I r W r I ..J, J�•w I W I I w u Jr. r r 2 to +e y i 1z elk a ts Ilk ID N, i I � °•N Jrn r 1I r r� I I 0' V..J JJ`r n . CC 2 1 CITY OF timmo CUCAMONGA s� COUN'T'Y OF ISAN BERNABDINO STATE OF CALIFOR2�IA � N Im R ' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. S ANNEXATION NO. ¢0 I HIGHLAND AVENUE ; LA 1 r ! m I \ C+ 4 C - Z n BA SELfNE rz17AD :• •I n psiCIS lb'! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BLRNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA T 6 '= 1V � R.• y f77 RESOLUTION NO. 88 —I44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORD_J! THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 40 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAP'NG AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Divislgu 15 of tlic Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri Lion of Work: That the public interest and convenience requ re an s e ni te�lon of this City Council to form a maintenance district to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described to Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities to connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located within roadway r_wyy enumerated In the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are nn file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled •Annexation No. 40 to Screet Lighting Maintenance District No. 10. SECTION 3. Descrl Lion of Assessment District: That the contemplate wor , in e t op Won o said City ounc , is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the - City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a c rict, which said district 1s assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain 'Map of Annexation No. 40 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City SECTION 4. Report of Engineer. The City Council of said City by Resolution No. • Tas approve�T report of the engineer of work which report Indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1° 1s on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. 13;L RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall bo collected at a same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of sa" City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report a: their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. i SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing Notice is hereb_ given that on April 7U,-TW at a our o 30 po —in the City Council Chmrbers at 9161 Btse Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent cf the assessment district, ma appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with tnls Resolution of Intention. Protests must be to writing and must contain a description of the property in which eacn signs thereof 1s interested, soff'cient to identify the sane, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that s,,n signer is the owner 3f the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping _ and Lightino Act of 1972: All the work herein propos- a alt -5e one- a and carried throug n puFsuance of an ac: of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Divis'm 15 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the State of California. SECTION S. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be maw prsuan to Secticit 61961 o e overrnen Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the Siena, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re art, a newspaper of ge,eral circulaL'on published in the City of On ar o a ornia, and circulated .n the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 133 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ST"F REPORT March 16,, Mqa City Council and City Manager Russell H. liaguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Jr. Eng,neerine Aide Approval to Anrex Parcel Map 9350, located on the north side of Use tine Road, between Milliken and Rochester Avenues, to Street Lighting Maintenance Dirtnct No. 3`as Annexation No. 9 and setting the date of public hearing for April 20, 1909 REC01!£MDATIOM It is approving the�nglneeras Report fornAme Annexation Noe 9a and setting theeLdate ` of public herring regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Street Lighting Maintenance District no. 3. Analysts /� Back�nd Attached for City CtlunNm approval is a revolution declaring the City's intent be annex Parcel Map 9350, located on the north side of Base Line Road. between Milliken and Rochester Awanues, to street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 as Anne�,ation 9 and setting the public hearing 'late for April 20, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving Pietiminary approval of the Engir!er's Report for tho subject annexation. Letters from tlw_ developers requesting the subject annexetton are on file In the Engineering Division. Resp ly s bmitted, i1n HM Attachments 134 J x �i n RESOLUTION N0. S 'e- IyS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIHI'AIRY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANPEXA'ION No. 9 TO STREET LIGHTING VAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 l Cucamonga directed theeCitylEnginneer toemakeyandufile wi!hhthe /CityfCRierk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and IiHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and MHEFEAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that. said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified to any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucanonga as follows: SECTION 1: That e Engineer's Estimate e expenses or-sa ff work annd oftheincidentalexpenses inconne costs connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of item are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr e n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are herby preliminarily approved and confirmed. land in saEC�sessmentaMstrlc'. sment thenestimatcd subdivisions benefit to be recetved by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of tie incidental expenses thereof, as contained In said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. Report fotECT ---i a parposesaofsala shall %tand as the proceedings. and pursuant tr'the proposed district. ME 35 CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 9 for Parcel Map 9350 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is to compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (!andscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon ail lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for wltn the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light Improvements on 'oval streets as sham on the Lighting District Alias Nap which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered if general benefit to all areas 11 the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basr. SECTION 3 Pens and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditicns of approvAJ for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract, map or levelopment plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting Improvement mi the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district inclide: the repair, removal or rcylacement of all or any part of any improvement, prodding for the illumination of the subject area. ,:. r' SECTION 4. Estimated sts No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based assessment on purposes awilidbeaasiindicated below. Thesencostscareoestimated only. actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance 01%trtct No. 3 is comprised of street light improvements on loca: streets for residential improvements (single family, multi- family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the Victoria Planned assessed as one assessment unit Each heoperation n h z oftheUistrict be It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and Institutional areas derives the saee benefit as two assessment units in residential areas. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District Mn. 3 is shown below: --� 1. 5 _C- E Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps LWPS Annex New Total L Size* YTD No. 9 Sm 1,058 - -- 1'08 9500L 82 °- *liigh Pressure Sodium vapor 2 Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units beforo .his annexation 3.186 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 206 Total Assessment Units 3.392 Total Annual Lamp Size Total Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cott 5800L 1,058 X S 8.93 X 12 $113,375.28 9.997.44 950CL 82 X 510.16 X 12 Total Annual Maint. Cost $123,372.72 2 Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units beforo .his annexation 3.186 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 206 Total Assessment Units 3.392 9 1. 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost $1223333772 72 • 536.37 /year /unit no.o n s n src Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram copies or the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled •Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3% Annexation No, 9. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all unit_ within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineers Report. 2. City Council adopts desolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a pubiasic hearing and al approves, or modifies and approves the individusessments. EXHIBIT •A• Properties and improvements to he included within Annexation No. 9 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 3: Project PH 9350 PC] 1 5 Pcl 2 Pcl 3 Total .s' Assess. No. of L s to be Annexed 80 Acreage -,L �_CL _ 44.9 90 --- --- __- --- 24.0 48 - -- ___ ___ __- 34.2 68 --- __- ___ ___ 103.1 206 _ _ _ I - 139 rr ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM F T LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION NO. NU AVENUE F �s 3l = t'e , 1m• N� 1F V I � m 1 - N D 11 ElA.SELlP1>E FZOAD C h Sy` CITY OF RANCHa CUCAILONGA COUNTY OF BAN BEBNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA w T �m RESOLUTION NO. SS -lyl, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONiGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 9 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of tha State of California, as follows: SECTI, 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience requ re an s e n en ion of this City Council to forte a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance-and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wTENin roadway rigF!-aTway enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 9 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 34. SECTION 3. Descri Lion of Assessment District: That the contrmplate�ct —,'in a op n on o sat d City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain -Map of Annexation No. 9 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 34 maps is on file in the officn of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution Mo._TFas approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Eng4neer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said Citr Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the maount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. /y/ RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION S. Collection of Assessments- The assessment shall be collected aET samei%e an�in iFe s� manner as County taxes are collected. The City Fngineer shall file a rt,rrt annually with the City Council of said C1 ^ and said Council will +awually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting to June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTIOrI 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on April 20, 1988, at-'the hour of pm n e City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formad in accordance with this Resolution of - Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the s me, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is riot shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property "'- described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be aLcompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein propose s all be done an carr a roug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Coae of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of intent ton: Published notice shall be ma pursuan o c on o o e overrvoen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the Sonia, and the City Clerk shall cause the save to be oublished 10 days before the date set for the hearing, it least once in The Daily Re ort, a newspaper of gene -al circulation published in the City of Onfa ?o, a ornla, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. �I lye. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: ':arch 16, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FRAY: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract Res. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561 and 13563 (Caryn Planned Comeunity) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 as Annexation No. 3 and setting the date of public hearing for April 20, 1988 RECOMMENDATION It is recomoended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexttion No. 3 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. S. Analysts /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract Mos. 12643. 13555, 13556. 13558. 13560, 13561 and 13563 (Caryn Planned Coamunity) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 as Annexation 3 and setting the public hearing date for April 20, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. . AWN- s /93 RESOLUTION No. 88 -14 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENUINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNE:(ATION NO. 3 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 8 WHEREAS, on March 16, 1968, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of slid City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report ` has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Ca A 1 has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finus that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOM, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City CounclI of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Ergineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o sa work and of the Incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained In said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That *he diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr e n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approver' and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisicns of land in sa UTssssment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the Incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for purposes of all subsequent Proceedings, and pursuant to the Proposed district. NY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Annexation No. 3 for Tract Nos. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561 and 13563 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Crllfornia (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. S. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting District Artas Map which is on file with the City Engineer Improvement maintenance is considered of gyeneral benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed or. a per unit basis. SFCTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated to the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illuminatfor of the subject area. Iv5 SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting Improvement construction. All improvements :ill be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment Purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessmrsts will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is •apprised of street light improvements on local streets for residential improvements (single family, multi - family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone wits be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all Industrial, commercial and institutional proiects throughout the city. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and Institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units fa Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: *High Pressure Sodium Vapor No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamo Lamp Size* YTD No 3 Total 5800L 168 65 233 9500L 0 0 0 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800L 233 X 5 8.93 X 12 $24,968.28 9500L 0 X $10.16 X 12 0 Total Annual Maint. Cost ',968.28 2 Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 631 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 298 Total Asses<nent Unit; 935 IV4 N P' �j. 3. Cast per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cast o. o n s n. r c • $24 526.70/year /unit Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained to Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessmeit Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled •Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5% Annexation No. 3. These diagrams are hereby Incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement! for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2 Vfy Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a Disi�ict and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in 'lay, the City Engiieer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individu4l assessments. /Y r' N EXHIBIT AA• Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 5: !98 4 Assess. No. of� !a s t�o be Annexed Project Acreage - flnft -- :OWL VD-VL i — ZT31HIL Tract 12643 49 8 - -- ___ 13555 47 10 ... __. _ -_ _ -_ 13556 40 9 °-- --- - -_ d_ 13558 52 13 - -- -__ _ -- ___ 13560 23 6 - -- . -_ ___ __- 13561 43 9 _._ _.. -__ -__ 13563 44 10 - -- _ -_ - -. Total 298 65 - -- - _ !98 4 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.5' ANNEXATION NO. 3 = TURF EM GROUND COVER TURF AREA 0 S.F. GROUND COVER AREA 30,440 S.F. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t 1 l COUNTY OF BAN MAMRWDINO SPATE OF CALMRM T b l� �v Im ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.5' I Alaw"TION NO. 3 1 17 10 19 20 J 21 32 23 u ss � - 10 is 14 13 12 11 10 >w W st " s e r a 9 p ss at ,.r. Jt 32 41 4 3 2 1 = Q k u 44 43 I I TURF TURF &REE GROUND COVER AREA t�^ GROUND COYER 7,275 S.F. 55,M S.F .v "� CITY OF RANCHO CUCA]iONOA 5� AP OF 8AN BERNARDINO ,1 = `` STATE OF CA MRNIA N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.5 ANNEXATION NO. 3 TURF •r`. GROUND COYER jgff AREA 0 S.F GROUND COVER AREA 48,480 S.F. v "mow CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t� COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIVO A e, ` 's STATE OF CALIFORNIA T V • ► l�f im ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.S' ANNEXATION NO. 3 J e POP'/ "/ f!'u'13'1eI1Y 2SI2710/25 24123/22/ rl20I u 2911"131l3:I33l24 133l34/ n TURF GROUND COVER TURF AREA 4,070 SY stleslsel °iu , ^~ GROUND COVER AREA 14,315 S.F. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAUNTY OF BAN RERNARDINO L BTATE OF CALIFORNIA N i t .:.11 • . ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.5 ANNEXATION NO. 3 TURF GROU14D COVER TURF AREA 4,300 S.F. GROUND COVER AREA 23,730 SY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA :._ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO �� ■ BTATE OF CALIFORNIA N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.S ANNEXATION NO. 3 TURF �r GROUND COVER TURF AREA 2,030 SY ,P" ! CI7Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t/ , COUPI`PY OF BAN BERNARDINO a STATE OF CALIFORWA Y� IT �� I` GROUND COVER ARE9 42,660 SY N 7 I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.S ANNEXATION NO. 3 s� mLueeeeeef ® TURF TURF AREA OU o COVER 6M GROUND COVER 6,2W S.F. 9,840 S.F. �% CITY OF RANCHO CUCA&tONaA COUNTY OF SAN PERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA T y. r� l�J m __ RESOLUTION No. %?—N? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO THE ANNEIIATIONITO STREETCLIIGHTINGTM4INTENANCE DISTRICT NO. S. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 3 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5• PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, belnq Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code 0f the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descrl tion of Mork: That the public interest and maintenance district aIn the City ofn Rancho nCucamonga 0for then maintenance and operation of those street iights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities to connection with said district. located SECTION 2. Location of Mork: The foregoing described work is to be Engineer wand m7moreaparlicularly described eontmapsnwhlchrareronofileeInithe office of the City Clerk, entitled 'Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5•. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contempla a war , in a op n on o sa y ounc 1s of mere than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain 'Map of Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District N0. 5' maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City SECTION 4 ofE O The Council i City pResolutionNoas app t e report of engineer of work Which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment :ones, titled 'Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance „ Is on Reference to saidreportlisihereby made efor all particulars ofor athe 0amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. /S (v RESOLUTION PAGE 2 collected Sa— —f SECTION of he same manner Tas aunty shall be collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearinnq: Notice 1s hereby given that on April 70—.M.— at ur o pm n the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, 1r the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must bp. in writing and must contain a description of the Property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property — described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accoopanled by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. herein Dropose3 sTia11L edsoneia acarriehtinr u9t on purzuancelof enact of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State or California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall De muan o ec on o e verrr,:en ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published In the City of On ar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. is-? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BT: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex OR 87 -26 (PM 10782) located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, to Street Lighting Maintenance District Mo. 6 as Annexation Mo. 13 and setting the date of public hearing for April 20, 1988 REC101MOATI n It Is approving recommended Engineer's Report foriAn Annexation No. 13 and setting resolutions date of public hearing regarding the City's lntentiou to annex the above described tracts to Street Lighting Maintenance District Mo. 6. Analysts /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex OR 87 -26 (PM 10782), located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, to Street Lighting Maintenance District Mo. 6 as Annexation 13 and setting the public hearing date for April 20, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. 4 Mm Attachments )S$ y �'i RESOLUTION NO. $8 -199 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 13 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 WHEREAS, on March 16, 1980, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping ano Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report In writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which repr has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ea follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses ofs—aTilwork and of the Incidental expenses In connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and de—sc—r-Te-rTh said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in saisessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SFCTICN 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for iFe purjoses of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the Proposed district. lsq CITY OF RANCHO CUCAR08GA Enginear's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 13 fo- ' OR 87 -26 (PM 10782) SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in conpllance with the requireiaents of Article 6, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments Into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have ai effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting District Aitas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map it development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the •epair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. A46 SECTION 4. Estimated costs rry NO r construction.„ iAll bimprovements owill rbetconstructed by developers. Basel on mailable data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street light Improvements gonalocalastreetstfortall industriai,icoommercialeand institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, coomercial and In atlas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in residential zones. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is shown below: I. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Leaps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No 13 Total 5800L 47 47 9500L 2 -- 2 'High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lam Size Lamps Rate Mops taint. Cost 5800L 47 % S 8.93 X 12 $5,036.52 9500L 2 X $10.16 X 12 243.84 Total Annual Maine. Cost $5,280.36 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 408 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 30.5 Total Assessment Units 438.5 J. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost f56 f12.12 /year /unit No. n s n s r c Assessment shall apply to each tot or parcel es explained in Section 6. /6/ SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the Proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this Lihtinantenane istrict N. 6- report and Annexation No. e13. • These tdiagramsgareiherebycincorporatedowithin the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment nivwit the fa general 3all units within the District and that assessment shalbequalfor each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of city Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceadings. Q. Every year to Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. /(0 Z. i 1 , EXHIBIT 'A' 4 7 Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 13 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6 s Assess. No. of Lam s to be Annexed Pro ect Acreage —Onif — r DR 87 -26 (PM 10787) pcl 1 1.8 4 - - --- - -- --- l 2 1.6 3 '-- '-- --- --' '-' ' pcl 3 2.3 5 - -- - -- -•- - -- - -- pcl 4 2.6 5 - -- --- - -- --- - -- pcl 5 2.1 4 pcl 6 1.9 4 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- �' pct 7 1.5 3 - -- pcl 8 2.3 5 - -- -•- - -- - -- --- PO 9 2.2 4 --- --- .. --- --- pcl 10 2.5 5 - -- -•- - -- - -- - -- pcl 11 4.6 9 --- --- --- --- - -- pcl 12 2.8 6 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- pcl 13 2.3 5 _ _ _ _ fi Total 30.5 62 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- I I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (o ANNEXATION NO. 13 4RROW ROVrf W i t T- .n�,O�Z, I ' I ' ib s 2 ♦ r .a �J G: of we" 044:a:. J. r �i it \ svrl Y Yr s` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO c ' STATE OF CALIFORNIA on — V': RESOLUTION NO. BS- 1$C) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION No. 13 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE ANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOM, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descrl tion of Mork: That the public interest and convenience requ re an s e n en ton of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervlsiou of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Mork: The foregoing described work is to be located wTEETn roadway r g -or -way enumerated In the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are un file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 13 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6". SECTION 3. DesiniRLIqniqf Assessment District: That the contempiate wor , in—He op in on sa y ounc 1s of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that co, tain "Map Cr Annexation No. 13 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Reoort of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * as approved? epprt of the engineer of work which report indicatpc the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenae District No. 6" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of ti-e assessments and for the extent of the work. /%a� RESOLUTION PAGE 2 collecte SECTION { e Sy�Colectio� n{ Aess es The shall be collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of�Hearrffn_q; Notice 1s hereby given that Best April ZO�+J$lII aty ur o •3O ; in the City Council Chambers at 9161 bJections to the work or extent of the Cucamonga, smentddistrict. may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or wily said district should not be formad in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the Property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must ue dalivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property " described writtenevidence thatesuch signeruis thetownerr of the t property socdeescribed.by then sch rcest must conain or be herein proposeasTalll edsoneian ac,r'tehtlnrou9t on work of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highwayl Code of the State of California. shall be FmaCTIONrsuan - oMec Publication oonof Resolution of Intention: Mayor notice shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the save, and tha City Clerk shall Cause the sane to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Oai1 Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of on Far e, a ornla, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 173 DATE: TU: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: WZ40EId1TION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhIONGA STAFF REPORT March 16, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide �4M Approval to Annex DR 87 -11, located on the north side of Nth Street, east of Hellman Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 43 and setting the date of public hearing for April 20, 1988 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 43 and setting the date of public heoring regarding the City's intention to annex the above described projects to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Analysis /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex DR 87 -11, located on the .iorth side of 19th street, east of Hellmn Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Annexation No. 43 and setting the public hearing date for April 20, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. A letter from the developer requesting the subiect annexation is on file in the Engineering Division. Resp y,� ttted, R Attachments I ?'/ RESOLUTION N0. gS- Ibl A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRCLININARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 43 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 Cucamonga directed theaCitylEngineer tto City file with theiCity Clark of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has male and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: expenses SECTION Csa work and of thegincidentaltexpenses in connection c therewith. contained In said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and de—sc—r—Med7n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and conHRttd. up lend in SECTION 3: ssessmentaDistriproposed t 1n proportioito then estimatedibenefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION EC Report forifie purposesaofsall subsequentlproeedings, andipursuantcto 'the proposed district. pis it. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 43 for OR 87 -11 I; SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, ChapVr 1, Division 15 of the Streets end Hfybways Code, State of California 1 (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdlvts'ons into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determf;ied that the tress to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within OR 87 -11 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. Ali landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on 05 record-id Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to th, City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaptng are as stipulated to the conditions of approval for the develop.ent and as apFroved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract .4ap or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development 1s hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for partway improvement construction. All Improvements will be constructed by developers, Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Including Annexation No. 43 1s as follows: 1-74 Existing Annex New 0istrict No.43 Total Landscape Area 920,152 0 920,152 No of 0. U 9,548 5 9,553 Per Lot Annual Assessment 920 ` 152 4553'— , .30 a — $28.90 1-74 b Assessment shall apply to each lot as enuarereted in Section 6 and the J attached assessment diagram. Whero the development ravered by this annexation foroInclusiontinethe maintenance district but willebe maintained bysanractive F homeovners association, these assessments shalt be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Diaoram A :oey of the ere posed assessment diagram is attached to this report and 1, labeled Exhibit A , by this reference the diagram 1s hereby incorporated ti within the text of this report. J SECTION 6. Assessment 4' Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all R lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment fcr each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the nu%ber of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscai year which are to be recovered through assessments as re qutrod y the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events I. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date 3 City Council condu.ts public herring, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4 Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5 Every year in June, the City Council conaucts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 1-77 F Properties and Improveaknts to be Included with,,, Annexation No. 43 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1: c J MAIWAINED AREA PROJECT UND COVER i �— IIN1T ° Ta�Ft• — S9_Ff . OR 87_11 10 6 .5 s �. 1-7 A Y .a 1 1 I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM t ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.,2 ANNEXATION ND. 43 sn,e "I II 1" �r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A t� 4 ENGINEERING DIVISION c�> n VIt:INITY MAP N n EED EL! II 1" �r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A t� 4 ENGINEERING DIVISION c�> n VIt:INITY MAP N n r- .v la x. RESOLUTION NO. '$ -1 -' A kESOLUTiON Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATIOk TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSI!<WT DI STRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 43 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1: PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT Or 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamongc, pursuunt to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descrl Lion T1 Work: That the public interest and convenlenre requirs an s n en ion of this City council to fore a maintenance district In the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faeill!tes •hereon dedicated for common greanbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system', trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is t) be located wTfFTn roadway r p -o -way and landscaping easements of Landscare Maintenance District No. I enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled 'Annexation No. 4S to Landscape Maintenance District No 1'. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplaTe-d-w-07F7 in the opinion ot sald OuncTT7 is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary tines shown upon that certain 'Nap of Annexation No. 43 to Landscape !iaintenancr District No. 1' heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indiciting by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment di trict and which map is on file in the office of the I ity Clerk of said City. $0 SECTION 4. Re ort of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution Nc. * as approve e}F repot of the engineer of work which report indicate% the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled •Engineer's Report Annexation No. *, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1• is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assassments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at a sane time Zn n e same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will he detsrmined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of H%arin : Notice is hereby given that on April ZD BS; at the hour of p.i n the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base any objections �ton the e %arkyorfextent ofuthhe a9sessmentndistrict,smay appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Rasolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the the , and must be delivered City Clerk of said City lteitprior to to identify time set for the hearing, and no other protests or obiettlops will be r.onsidered. If the signer of any protest rs not shorn upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that suct signer is the owner of the property so described. SFCTION 7. Lnndsca ii_nq� and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein proposer sTall eb deno mda carried tWroug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 0. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pusuan to 52ction 61951 o a overrunen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Detl Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar o, a ornta, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex 09 87 -26 QM 10782), located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 17 and setting the date of public hearing for April 20, 1988 IECO004M7ION Tt is re,oaaaended that City Council aojpt the attached resclutions approving the Engineer's Report for Anrexation No. 17 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described projects to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council apppproval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex DR 87 -26 N910782) located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Annexation No. 17 and setting the public hearing date for April 20, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. A letter from the developer requesting the subject annexation is on file in the Engineering Division. A :J fu ly submitte:jh Attachments I F.)— i rw RESOLUTIO4 NO. $2 -153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REP01Y FOR ANNEXATION NO. 17 TO LANJSZAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 NHSREAS, on March 16, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clem of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered saii report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor arty part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLYED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o --s—a —work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and de—=75-27n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said s�smert District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and conformed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for Eie —purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed distri:t. I83 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMINGA }� Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 17 For DR 87 -26 (PM 10782) f' SECTION I. Authority y f_ o_ r Report r, f I, This 15 of Is Sin trreeetsaand Hice of CalifornimentS of Article Chapter the (Landscoptng and Lighting Act of 197 ). SECTION 2. General De�Ption This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape to is Maintenance maintained wenanceDistrict effect 3. ThepCi a1 all h, opmentsiasdmentionedsabovee All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed d be grat are shown on t the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be grann ted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions tof,approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Reference is hereby Dade to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped preto. foprovemient on the individual development 1s specifications erebymde a part of this r he the same extent as if said plans and SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median velopers improvement coconstruction. y. Posed will be contract nalysisbandtdeveloped and arfby the City. work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purpose will estimatedlonly. actual0asses cents smentrwillabe S3sed on year. tual cost data. are Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zoness57 Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling n square feet The district was formed in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance casts within the project boundary Only as SSJpulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. 184 1r Zone 2 is comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from -est to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th t ,et to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rocheste, venue and median islands on other major divideG highways and some parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexatton No. 17 is as follows. Zone 1 Total estimated maintenance cost Assesaent units Total cost - assessment unit for year and month Zone 2 Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. Assessment units, acres Total cost . assessment unit for year and month Existing District $2,070 8 $2,,0070 • $258.75 /year or $21.55 /mo. /lot Existing Annexation New District No. 17 Total_ 0 0 0 380,601 30.5 380,631.5 $ 0 /year 0 /mo./acre - 380- b3I- -T Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5 Assessment Diagram A copy of the eroposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled Exhibit A , by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SUS a M W M, SECTION 6. Assessment „ — Ieprovements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the Ofstrfct and -that assessment shall be equal for each parcel for Zone I and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or parcel in Zone 2. The City Council wilt hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required y the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events I. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets Public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and ---- determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year to Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. M M M Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 17 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance Dfstrict No. 3: PROPERTIES s PROJECT " ACREAGE OR 87 -26 ON 10782) PC] 1 pcl 2 1.8 pcl 3 1 6 pci 4 2.3 Pcl S 2.6 ptl 6 2.1 PC] 7 1.9 pcl 8 1.5 pcl 9 2.3 PC] 10 2.2 Pcl 11 2.5 pcl 12 4.6 PC] 13 2.8 2.3 30.5 'Mp;AVENENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN kiNEXATION N0. I Area Sa• Ft. .13ven 'venue 0 �000111 Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th St,•eet O Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 18.7 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I :ewc ,gip -.�.c -• = IC J I LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION N0, 17 LRROW House yr ¢ °r'II � • � I �/r.• WI I I :ewc ,gip -.�.c -• = IC J I �' n t•.J.ao'•v Ll� CITY OF RANCHO CUCP ANIONGA Y ENGINEERING DIVISION n ' VICINITY MAP yr ¢ °r'II � �' n t•.J.ao'•v Ll� CITY OF RANCHO CUCP ANIONGA Y ENGINEERING DIVISION n ' VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION N0. %?-is y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC40 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION As ANNEXATION NO. 17 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3• PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THEPETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descriotfon of Work: That the public interest and convenfence requ re and it is them en -0n of this City Counril to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga fur the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls In connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located w 01,, Medway rigTi{�and .andscapinq easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the offico of the City Clerk, entitled 'Annexation No. 17 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3' SECTION 3. Descri tfon of Assessment District: That the contemplate worF, n the op n on o sa ounc s o more than local or ordinary public oeneflt, and the said City Council hereby cakes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain 'Map of Annexation No. 17 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3' heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. •, indicating by said boundary lines the extees nt of the territory included within the proposed asssment district and which map Is on file to the office of the City Clerk of said City. i89 SECTION 4. Re rt of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution o. as approve a repor of the engineer of iwork which report Indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment ones, titled 'Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 17, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3' is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby jade for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected d same— ime an n raw manner as-- County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in Jane, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION G. Time and Place of Near�inQ: Notice is hereby given that on April 'l0; rgW at t e or o 1n the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any Objections to the work or, extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution- of Intention. Protests must be In writing and mist contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to ,dentify the same, and must be delivered to the rlty Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest 1s not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owns- of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain cr be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner o. the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca fn and L1 htin Act of 1972: All the work herein propose s all 3e ne an Carr a through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Pub'fcation of Cesolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuan ect an o e Governwnt Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution aid the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once to The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n ar o, a ornia, end circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. REM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1588 TO: City Council and City Manager 'ROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer ff: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract Mos. 12613, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561, A 13563 (Caryn P.C.) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 3 and setting the date of public hearing for April 20, 1988 AECONENDATION ,t is recrwended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 3 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described projects to Landscape Maintenance District Lo. 6. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the Pity's intent to annex Tract Nos. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561, 6 13563 (Caryn P.C.) to Landsca a Maintenance District No. 6 for Annexation No. 3 and setting the public hearing date for April 20, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file to the Engineering Division. Resprt y mltted, RHM JAA: Attachments /9/ C9 RESOLUTION N0. %T— MSS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 3 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and ufile with the iCityfClerkhof said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Mkt, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council ,`.as duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of sold sport 1s sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, require s or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cft„ of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized ccsts and expenses o sT aid —work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and desc—rffe-U7n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land In saTa Kssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contafrrM in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shalt stand as the City Engineer's Report foriFe purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. /�l /91- t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Y Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 1Caryn P.C.) Annexation No. 3 for Tracts 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561, 13563 r SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Articie 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tracts 12643, 13555, 13556, 13558, 13560, 13561, 13463 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained In the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -nay or casements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3 Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are cs stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract reap or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact Ircatlon of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped i,provement on the individual development is hereby wade a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4 Estimated Costs No costs will be Incurred for parkway improvement construction. All Improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, - ontract analysis and developed work standards, it 1s estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) cents per square foot per year These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 Including Annexation No. 3 is as follows: Existing Annex New District No. 3 Total Landscape Area 889,205 253,055 1,114,260 No of O. U 896 298 1,194 Per Lot Annual Assessment 1 � 1 114 260 x30 279�� .96 • $23 33 1�4 — /F3 t Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves oniinethe maintenance district but willebe. maintained by an homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A coey of the eroyosed assessment diagram fu attached to this report and labeled Exhibit A , by this referen_e the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment �r Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all ? lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there 1s more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable Idnd, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the grevious fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required y the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval Of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testfmony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5 Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. i9y r R+�i - • '�:c q�'�'ykAi �„ � S {vd'le"9Y .`W` A Properties and improvements to be Included within Annexaticn No-. 3 to :4 Landscape Maintenan— District No. 6. w TRACT D MAINTAINED AREA ; --. ND COVER Sa Ft• 3 r 12643 19 Netherlands View Loop 30,440 13555 47 BarDyon St/ Sierra Crest View Loop 7,275 55,795 13556 40 8anyon St./ - Sierra Crest View Loop r 48,280 ?� 13558 52 Sierra Crest View Loop 2,070 22,345 �P 13560 23 Vintage Drive 4,300 21.716 - 13561 43 Netherlands View Loop 2,030 42,660 13563 44 ME 9.840 21,965 231,090 t9s ASSESSMEW DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. �o ANNEXATION N0.3 TURF LRF AREA GROUND COYER 0 S.F. s� \ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,YIOi \'GA ENGINEERING DIVISION nn VICINITY MAP GROUND COVER AREA 30,410 S.F. A N .v S 3 .5 N I 8 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 ANNEXATION NO. -3 n 17 10 t� 20 21 ?2 b Js u L 29 29 27 u 1J a 13 12 11 10 37 38 6 0 7 t f 33 1 y J1� JO 4I J 3 1 q 42 41 � ,. n w u TURF TURF &RM GROUND COVER AREA Y..a GROUND COVER 7,275 S.F. 55,785 S.F. si` 21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S s EN61NEERING DIVISION ' VICINITY SIAF N rr. I �I I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM � ' LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4o ANNEXATION NO.3 ti rp 11 to 14 to 'a 17 � � u �"— b >a to a „ n ar oa ® TURF TURF AREA GROU D COVER AREA r� GROUND LOVER 0 S.F. 48,280 S.F. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA NIOi%GA �SSb ENGINEERING DIVISION 6 VICINITY NIAP 11 -- in i J ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. G ANNEXATION NO.3 _ 6 i pL3 L 2 olo t 2112'1261"121 '23122121/20/19 29130131132133134133 1 as = TURF 00 GROUND COVER TURF AREA 2,070 SY .., a2I at 1'�I lalu �i��M r -'„1421431" GROUND COVER AREA 22,545 SY CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,%IONGA w ENGINEERING DIVISION `c 6 VICINITY 11AF 1 nn = TURF GROUND COVER ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4, ANNEXATION N0. ,3 TURF AREA 4,300 S.F. GROUND COVER AREA 21,730 S.F. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOivGA r j ENGINEERING DIVISION ' T C' 6 VICINITY ,NIAP - � inn t 3i i. Y ASSESSMENT U!AGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 44 ANNEXATION NO.3 - TURF GROUND COVER TURF AREA 2,030 S.F. c% CITY OF RANCHO CUCk%,IQNrA 73 C� 5 ENGINEERING DIVISION to" VICINITY NIAP GR_ �OUND COVER AREA 42.660 S.F. ' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXPSTION NO.3 rr .,- ,a + 2 t 0 11 x 0040 41tlN K 12 27 13 20 s x a2 22 01 20 s 2s n � 1s c 10 10 17 t0 10 20 21 22 22 24 20 20 TURF TURF AREA GROUND . OG VER ALEE& CROUNO COYER 8,290 S.F. 9,W S.F. h� +�lY CITY OF RANCHO CL'CA,`IONGA w ENGINEERING DIVISION N VICINITY Nt.�P hm RESOLUTION NO. S$'157 10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNi.A DECLARING ITS INTENTION TU ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 3 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING, ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. convenlenc —e requ re anascrf stonene f�tion oftthis CitylCouncilinterest to firm a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga fo^ ae minteruncu and operatlor of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedi:ated for coiwn greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision Tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection inch said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Hark: The foregoing described work is to be located 4M- rnroadwa rigght--or -way and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of Vie City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 3 to Landscape Mtaintenance District No. 6. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplated work. in—fie op n on o sa TnUnW is of care than local or ordinary public benefit, and +%e said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the e::terlor boundary lines shown upon that certain 'Map of Annexation No. 3 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6' heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. ao3 .iN f SECTION {. R000rt of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution no. - Fas approve report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled 'Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 3, Landscape' Maintenance District No. 6' is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collects at same me a n same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a rsport annually wlth':he City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin . Notice is hereby given that on April 30; I9 . at our aT 7c70 p.m. iu the City Council Chaayers at 9191 Base Line, In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed In accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contairy a description of the property in which each signer, thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk or said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then seh protest must contain or be accompanted by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. _Lan�dscapin %anddLLi tin Act of 1972a All the work herein propose —sFa11 a nb do a and care n pursdance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be -a-ale pursuan Section o vernmen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the sa..e to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Da11yRe Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On Th ar o —i Cs— Tfortrnia, and circulated in the City r' Rancho Cucamonga, California. Y" goy 11 ORDINANCE NO. 341 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUNGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA PLANNED COWINITY MfNMIEHT 88-01 TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO CERTAIN USES N IN THE SHOPPING CDMERCIAL STANDARDS SECTION CENTERS THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does ordain as follows, SEGI10N 12 The City Council hereby finds and determines the following, A. That following a publicghearriing held In the et me and Rancho ner prescribed by law. recomxends the Community Plan text amondment hereinafter slid time land• mannori proscribed by laws and duly heard and reonsidered said recommendation. 0. Gonerethis aCommfutbeYCplan text amendment e ins consistent with the C. Development Codenofythe City ofaRanchonCaramOnngaii storrt with the D environmental impact as provided nin will the Negative Declaration filed heroin. LQ ION 2r The Comm,urity Plan text of the Victoria Planned Community, Part III, Section I. Regul,.rons and Standards For Devoloimont, subsection "Copmaerclal Standards ". A"onding on Page 2350 is hereby amended to read as followsr CO.WAICT l SIMAIAM S 1. General Regional DrelatednCommercial and designated aCommercial. anal Cantor, a. Site Development Standards, (1) Building site coverages No maximun subject to Develop - wrrt AD" ^aa) Process. (2) Building site width, 150 foot minimum. �oS Ordinance No. 341 Page 2 ' (3) Building height: 65 foot typical maximum) buildings r over 65 faot subject to a Conditional Use Permit. b. Uses bet permitted within the Planned Community: (1) Message Parlors. (2) "Adult" Movie Theaters. (3) "Adult" Baal, Stores. c. Shoioinm Canton. To ensure that the goals and poll loos of the General Plan and Community Plan are implomentede a Conditional Use Permit shall be required for shopping centers. In such a review, the following criteria shall be considered, (1) The transition from more sensitive land uses and buffering methods to mitigate commercial activities i:uch as loading, lighting, and trash collection) (2) The center has been olannod as a group of organized uses and structures) (3) The center is designed with one theme, with buildings and landscaping consistent in design (similar archituctural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordf cated landscaping theme)) (4) The center makes provisions far consistent maintenance, rociprocal access and reciprocal parking) (5) vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensivo circulation system( and (6) The development or approval of any portion of a center shall require the development of a conceptual develop- ment plan which shall constdor such things as, but not limited to, circulation, uniform architectural design, drainage /grading, buffers, phased Improvements end landscaping. a. The following goneral categories of uses shall be permitted: (1) Retail businesses, including, but not limited to: o department stores o drug stores FM 1 Ordinance No. 341 Pago 3 l" o Jewelry stores o book stares r. o record stares le; 0 hi- fidolity equipment sales o cloth I ng stares o mun(cal Instrument sales 0 bhoe sto -63 L 0 candy stores 0 photography equipment sales v 12) Service businesses, Including, but not limited ton o watch and jewelry repair I boauty parlors o travel agencies o locksmiths 0 banks and finenrlal institutions o movie theaters (3) Administrative and professional offices. (4) Commercial recreation. (5) Restaurants. (6) Nurseries and garden supply stores, providod that fertilizer of any type shall be sold and stored in packaged form only. (7) Public Utility offices. (8) Wholesale business offices with samples on the premises, but not to Include general storage. (9) Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above uses as permitted by the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance. (10) Permitted Community Facilities listed on Pago 241. b. Uses pormitted subject to specific approval of Conditional Use Permitr (1) Animal care facil tiles. not including kennels. (2) Parking lots and parki,.g buildings. (3) Automobile service stations and car washes. (4) Automobile sales and service. PO 0) Ordinance Nu. 341 Pago 4 (5) Electric distribution switch stations. a (6) Communication equipment buildings. (7) Public utility booster stations. (6) Commercial recreation. '[ (9) Accessory structures and uses neosssary or customarily incidental to the above uses as specifically provided for by the use permit and the Zoning Ordinance of the s City of Rancho Cucamonga. (10) Conditionally pormittod Community Facit hies Listed on Page 241. (11) Shopping centers subject to provisions in Section 1 on Page 235. 3 RFGTONA( MATED LAM USE a. The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: (1) Retail business, including, but not limited to: • department stores • furniture stores o automobile stores • pot stores • motorcycle sales and sery Ica • home Improvement cantor o hardware stores • grocery stores • clothing stores o meat markets or delicatessens (2) Service business, including, but not I Imitod to • banks. financial Institutions • automobile repair • blueprinting and photostating • cleaning and pressing business o laundries o locksmiths o mortuaries o mechanical auto wash o plumbing supply o movie thoaters • photographic supplies or studios • equipment rental a0a Ordinance No. 341 Page 5 (3) Administrative and professional offices. 70. (4) Rostaw ants. (5) Commercial. (6) Autonobild service facilities. (7) Nurseries and garden supply stares, provided that fertilizer of any typo be stored and sold in packaged form only. (8) Public utility offices. (9) Hotels and mdels. (10) Sol f-sery ice laundry and self- sorvico dry clowning facilities. (11) Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily Incidental to the above uses as Pormitted by the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance. (12) Permitted Community Facilities listed an Page 141. c. Uses permitted subject to a Conditional Use Permit: (1) Animal care facilities. (2) Public utility booster stations. (3) Parking lots and pa -king buildings. (4) Public utility oshango and substations. (5) Public buildings. (6) Accessory st-uctures and uses necessary or customarily 'ncidontal to the above uses as specifically provided for by the use permit. (7) Conditionally permitted Community Facilities Iistod on Page 241. (6) Shopping Comers subject to provisions in Section 1 on Page 235. 4 yI ' A, COMMERCIAL a. The following general categurioe of uses shall oe permitted- A0 9 Ordinance No. 341 Page 6 ill RoUll bualnessos, Including but not limited tm • oromry stores n moat markets, del icatessens I produce markets • drug stares o dry hood stores u hardware sales J pat stores * clothing stores o florist shops (2) Service businesses, including but not limited tot o banks, financier; Institutions o barbar shops, beauty Parlors 0 1 ockam tth s o laundry and dry cl aani ng establ tshments o solfiserv:ce laundry and dry cleaning (3) Ads tn)strative and professional off loos. (4) Governmental offlcos. (5) Restaurants (other than fast food), lncludfna Incidental serving of be.r and wine but without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment ar dancing. (6) Accessory structures and uses necessary or custanartly Incidental to the above as provided for in the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance. b. Usna porefttod subject to specific approval of a Conditional Use Pormltt (1) Autosotive service stations. (2) Convenience manwrs. (3) Fast food restaurants. (4) Vim and liquor stares. (5) Restaurants with Wdertafinent and/or sorefng of Alcohol to beverages. (6) Shopping centers subject to provisions In Section 1 on Pago 235. (71 Conditionally permitted Community Facilities listed on .%ge 241. .�/0 i Ordinance No. 341 Page 7 r lam' i SECTION 3. The Naycr shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the save to be published within fiftoon (15) days after its oascage ji at least once in Jta ne11y Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and cirafeted in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. :i n. i i ORDINANCE NO. 342 i AN CRDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAFDNOA, CALIFORNIA, AIOFTDNO TERRA VISTA CO)IUNITY PLAN AENWENT C8 -01, TO WDIFY THE CONIUNIFY PLAN TEXT TO RECUIRE A CONDMON/L USE PER)OT FOR SHOPPING CENTERS AND CERTAIN USM IN DIE OFFICE AND C0M4:RCIA1 STANDARDS SECTION OF THE TERRA VISTA COAAUI,:TY PLAN The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Boas ordain ao fol lows: { SFCTION It The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Comtission of the City M Randto C camorgi, following a publ lc hoarinq hold to the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends that Community Plan text amendment heroiroftcr 1 dorcribed, and this City Council has held a publ!e hearing in the time and manner prescribed by low and duly hwid and considered said reo mendation. B. That this Community Plan text anendsont to consistent with the Oeroral Plan of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That thia Community Man tayt amendmett is ce-,r.! staid, with the Devolopmont rodo of the City of Farzho Cucamonga. D. This Community Plan text amendment will have no signifirant envirormantal impact as providod to the Negative Doclarati.ca filed herain. SECTION 21 The Ccmmunit" Plan tort of the Torra Vists Plannad Community, Part V, Section "Office and Comercial Davolopmont Ftcndards", commencing on Paga V -20, is hereby amondod to raaa as rolimwss Office and Commercial Dovelopsent Standards General a All Offtco and Cwmmsmewrfal aQM o Urns not permitted within the Manned CommunityN (a) Nassago Parlors (b) *Adult* Mwio Theaters (c: "Adult* Bork stores -� I;)— Ordinance No. 342 Pago 2 0 sh9ppi0g Center . To ensure that the goals and pol tctas of the General Plan and Commmity Plan are implemented, a Conditional Use Permit shall be required for shopping canters. In such a review, the following crtberta shall be conatdered: (a) The transitior, from mare sensitive land uses and buffering methods to mitigate commercial activities such as loading. lighting, and trash collection; (b) The carder has been planned as a group of organized uses and structures) (c) The center is designed with one theme, with buildings and landscaping conststent with design (similar architectural style. similar artartor building materials, and a coordinated landscaping thmre)1 (d) The center makes provisions for consistent maintenance, rociproal access and ractprocal parking= " (a) vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation systeml and (f) The development or approval of any portion of a center shall require the development of a conceptual development plan which shall consider such things as, but rot limited to, circulation, uniform rchitactural Gestgn, dratnage /grading, buffrs, phased Improvements and landscaping. Uses rarmltted in Arena Dnsignatod !M" The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: Retail businesses. such as, but nct limited tot Department stores Shovrooa/cr.talogue stores Outlet or off -price stores Variety stores Import stores Grocery stores Nl Icatussons Bakeries and other sleclalty food stores Nine and l lquor stores Drug stores Clothing stores Shoo stores Jewelry stores Book stores Record stores Electronics equipment stores A13 Ordinance No. 342 Pate 3 RadioM /storoo stores Photo equipment stores a Furniture stores Wallcoverings stores Lighting stores Pet stores Hardware stores C Sporting goods stores plant stores Tory stcres Gift shops Service businesses, including but not limited tot Travel agencies Beauty parlors and barbers Printers Dry cleaners and laundries Photo and art studios or galleries Locksmiths Adninistrative and professional offices, including but rot limited to: Real estate brokers Insuranco agents Optometrists Tax preparation services Legal or accounti•tg offices Medical or de ^'al offices Adninistrativ• offices Employment agut.cies Escrow companies Banks and other ftaencial institutions Eating end drinking establishments Cacmerct el recreation and antertai mein. tncl uding but not 1 imited tot ilov to theaters Health clubs and spas Music or dance studios Facilities for the performing arts Automobllo businesses limited to the followings Service stations and car rashes (CUP) Auto parts stores Auto sales and service businesses affiliated with a %apartment store or similar concern (CUP) Community facilities as specified above X19 Ordinance No. 342 Pago 4 7 A f i Hotels ano motels (CUP) Wholesale tusinosses (CUP) Shopping centers subject to provisions as specified above (CUP) Accessory structure and uses noceseary or customarily incidorn.al to the above uses Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification N^nc Permitted in Areas Designated ^G^ The following general categaries of uses shall be permittods Retail businesses, such as, but not limited toe Home improvement canters Furniture stares Carpet and flooring stores Paint and wallcoverings stores Lighting stores Radlo/iV /stereo stores Musical Instrument stores Home furnishings and accossories stores shwro ,Wcatalogue stores Import stares Outlet or off -price stores Electronic equipment stores Telephone stores Auto parts storos Nurseries and garden supply stares F l a mt stor es Home appliance stores Plumbing supply stores Service businesses (or salon- and -service businesses), including but not 1 united toe Interior designers Landscape architects Pool and spa installers Cabinetmakers and other coatra,tors Locksmiths Home security analysts Equipment rental Home apps lance repel man Wholesale businesses deal Ing in products related to home decoration, furnishing, or improvment (OUP) Z5 Ordfmnm No. 342 Pago 5 Retail, service, or wholesale businesses other than the above, not ;p related to home decoration, furnishing, or improvement, but not to exceed 25% of total building area and only if approved by the Planning Commission pursuant to a CUP Eating and drinking establishments (CUP) Banking and other financial institutions (CUP) Automobile service stations (CUP) Community facilities as specif fed above Shopping centers subject to provisions as specified above (WP) Accessary structures and uses necessary nr custonarily incidental to the above uses Other uses which are found by tt•e Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Uses Permitted in Arwaa Designated "WT The following general categories of uses shall be port:itted: Administrative offices Professional offices, including but not limited to such professions as: Accounting Law Insurance Architecture Engineering Medicine CoM1 stry Real estate Financial brokerage Securities brokerage Institutional and govermental uses Retail and servicz businesses serving the needs of office users, including but not limited to: Printers stationers Secretarial services Commercial recoation facilities compatible with office use, including but not l iniited to: P ILD Ordinance No. 342 Page 6 Health clubs or gyms (CUP) Racquetball courts (CUP) Banks and other financial institutions Eating and drinking establishments Am.cmobilo service stations (CUP) Community facilities as specified above Accessory structures and uses necessary or custanarily incidontal to the above uses Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification iisr,c Permitted in Areas Designated aRC^ The following genera, categories of uses shall be permittod: Commercial recreation and entertairmont facilities, including but not limited to: Health clubs, gyms, spas Racquetball clubs Dance studios Karate or yoga studios Swimming pools Tennis courts Batting cages (CUP) Trampol Ines (CUP) Miniature golf (CUP) Video arcades (CUP) Bowling alleys Skating rinks Retail and service businesses oriented to active recreation, Including but not limited toe Bicycle re cal, repair, and sales Skate rental Kite shop Sports equipment rental Sportswear salus Sporting goods store Pro chop Eating and dri Ming ostabl Ishments, including but not l imitod to: Sidewalk cafes oi'7 Ordinance No. 342 Pago 7 Coffee houses Frozen yogurt or too cream parlors Snack bars or kiosks Specialty retail and sory ice bust nssses, '•mil udi ng but not l im ltod tot Art galleries and studios, Indoor or outdoor Crafts and hobbles shops Flower shops Health food stores Gift shops Public or private facilities for tho performing arts, indoor or outdoor including but not limited tot Little theater Amphitheater Outdoor assembly or performing arts aroa Grocery stores, general, convenience, and /or specialty (CUP) Community facilities as specified above Shopping centers subject to provisions as spociftod above (CUP) Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above uses Other uses which are found by the Planning Coaafssion to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification gyga Permitted in Aremc Designated "W" The following general categories of uses shall be permittedt Retail bust nossos, including but not limited tot Grocery stores Dal tcatossons Bakeries and other specialty food stares Drug stares Clothing stores Variety stores Hardware stores Plant stores Gift shops Service businesses, including but not limited tot Beauty parlors and barbers Printers 218 Ordinance Mo. 942 Page 8 i' Dry cleaners and laundries ,? Travel agencies Locksmiths � Adnini strattvo and professional offices Y 'f Restaurants (other than fast food), including incidental serving of beer and wine but without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertaineent or dancing R Banks and other financial Institutions i- Ommercial recreation fscil ities, Including but net l Imitod to health clubs and studios (CUP) u. ,i Autanobile service stations (CUP) Convenience sarkets (CUP) 5 Fast -food restaurants (CUP) Wine and liquor stores (CUP) Restaurants with entertalment and/or serving of alcoholic beverages Community facilities as specified above, including Institutional and govermental uses Shopping centers subject to provisions as specified above (CUP) Accessory structures and uses necessary or custonarily incidental to the above uses Other uses wrnich are found by the Planning Ceeunission to be consistent with the spirit and Intent of this land use classification jjgns Pomaittnd in Areas Desfanatnd nMFCw The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: Residential uses as pormitted In High Density and Medina High Density rosidertNal areas Retail businesses Restaurants Adnintstrative and professional off Ices so" ice businesses Institutioral and govermental uses 219 Ordtnance No. 312 Pagm 9 Automobile service stations Conmorclai recreation and entertainment facilities Community facil Rtes as specified above Accessory structures and uses necessary cr custmarily incidental to the above Other uses which are found by the Planning Ctahmission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classificatfon Uses Zgrmitted in Areas Designated "MiN1^ The following general categories of uses shall be pesmittedt Residential uses as permitted as High Density and Me ihm High Density residential uses Hospitals, el tnfes, and ot"r medical uses Modical offices Other uses accessory or related to the above lnctudfng but not limited tot Retail businesses Administrative and professional offices Service businesses Restaurants Commercial recreation and entertatm ent facilities Community facilities as specified above Ac ssso•y structures ane uAS necessary or customarily incidental to the above Othsr uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Uses Porm!tted in Area" Designated "MOO" The following general categories of uses shall be permitteds Residential uses es permitted to High Density, Medium High Density, and Medium Density residential uses Administrative and professional offices Autmotivo sales and sorvico businesses "Z "to Ordinance No. 342 Pago 10 Autcactive service stations and car rashes Community facil foes as specif led abovo Accessory facilities and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent S" with the spirit and intent of this land use clasolfication YJ '-Ito neveleoment Standards far Office and Commercial Use P Bidding site area. sito width, and site depths No minimum subject to Csvel opment Rev tee prose is. Building site coverage: No maximum. Building setbackso As Indicated in Table V -5. Parking setbacks: As indicated In Table V -5. Nall setbacks: As Indicated to Table V -5. Building heights For areas designated "NC "s 40 feet maximum. For other areas: No maximum. Building separations As permitted by the Uniform Building Codo. SECTION 1, The Kayor shall sign this Ordisv"ce and the City Clerk shall muse the same to be publ tshed within - iftoe :: days after its passago at least once in The nativ Reonrt, a newspaper of gem circulation published Inthe City of Ontario. California, and circulated e.. the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. az1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 7ATE: March 16, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES91ENT AND GENERAL PUN AMENDMENT 88-01A - JMLJ L. Livutx - n request to ameno the general Plan Md use map —from 0ffIce to Neighborhood Commercial for approximately 3.45 acres of land, located on the southwest' corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue - APR: 208- 202-13, 14. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT eve epmen s r c s ep rom fee /professional (OP) to Neighborhood Comwercial INC) for approximately 3.45 acres of land, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Heilman Avenue - APN: 208-202 -13, 14. 1. RECOMMENDATION: At Its meeting of January 27, 1988, the Planning oem sly sTTon recoiwended the City Council deny General Plan Amendment 88-OIA and Development District Amendment 87 -11 If the City Council concurs, adoption of the Resolutions of Denial would be appropriate. I1 BACKGROUND: The project applicant, James E. Carter, has submitted al—E erequest of the property owner, Rancho Center Associates, this General Plan and Development District Amendment requesting a change of the existing designation from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. The applicant contends that t.11s change is necessary because current market conditions do not warrant the development of this site for office use. A traffic study and market feasibility analysts have been submitted as attachments to this application. The Planning Commission reviLved this project at their meeting of January 27, 1988. This Item was originally scheduled for City Council review at the meeting of February 17, 1988. However, upon written request of the applicant, this item was continued to the March 16 public hearing. As of this writing, the applicant has scheduled a meeting to discuss possible alternatives. Staff will forward the results of this discrssion to the Council at the public hearing by oral presentation. aaa, CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 88.01A/GDA 87 -11 - CARTER Mach 16, 1588 Page 2 III. on July 16, 1986, the City Council directed that five Office /Professional sites and one Commercial site be studied by the Planning Commission for possible General Plan land use changes. The project site at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue was one of the five sites identified by the City Council. The Planning Commission reviewed the five sites at their meeting of August 27, 1986. In the review of the Base Line /Hellman site, three alternative land uses were considered: 1) Medium Residential, 2) Neighborhood Commercial, and 3) Office. The Com fission determined that multi - family residential would not be appropriate adjacent to Base Line and therefore, was not in favor of the first alternative. Likewise, the Commission was opposed to the second alternative to Neighborhood Commercial. The Commission concurred that the site was a difficult one to develop, and their concern was that to redesignate the site to a core intense Commercial use would only magnify the already existing problems. The consensus of the Commission was tc recommend to the City C.)uncil that this site retain its Office designation. At their meeting of November 5, 1986, the City Council reviewed the Planning Commissions recommendations regarding the various sites for possible rodesignation. The City Council concurred with the Planning Commission's analysis and the Council chose not to change the site's existing Office designation. Cr =ission and City C current proposal, the I th,y did with their pre that tit subject prope site incapable of at intensities resulting i Commercial without s adjacent p operties. peE£{ng ovary 27, the ity until deny The current proposal, as requested by to the one reviewed by the Planning 11 in 1986. In their review of the lsslon arrived at the sane conclusion as s review. The Planning Commission found s physical design constraints render the tely handing the increased land use a land use redeslgnaticn to Neighborhood ficant adverse impacts resulting to •efore, the Planring rommission, at the B. adopted Resoiutiona recommending that proposed General Plan and Oevelopeent Dr ad Bu r / pg"-- L1ty Pl nor D8 ko Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of January 27, 1988 planning Cemaission Resolution No. 88-24 (GPA) Planning Commission Resolution No 88-25 ODA Continuance Letter Dated February 11, 1938 Draft Resolutions of Denial CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAN STAFF REPORT p z U V DATE: January 27, 1988 L977 TO: Chairman and Merbers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-CIA revest to dmena rme beneral Plarr Land Use -map from - Commercial" Office to 'Neighborhood Commercial" for approximately 3.45 acres of land, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue - APN: 208.202- 13,14. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT request o amen e uevelopmens Districts map from Office /Professional (OP) to Neighborhood Commercial INC) for approximately 3.45 acres of Tand, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue APN: 208.202 -13,14 ABSTRACT: The applicant, James E. tarter, has initiated both a enera tan and Development Districts Amendment to change the existing Office designation to Neighborhood Commercial for 3.45 acres of land on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue. The Planning Commission previously considered redesignating the site from Office to Neighborhood Commercial In August, 1986. At that time, the Commission recommended that the site retain its Office designation. The Commission felt there were a number of design difficulties associated with this site and was not in favor of a Commercial redeslgnation which cculd potentially Increase the land use Intensity of the site, and therefore, magnify the ldontified design difficulties in Its development. Although staff has required the submittal of traffic and market studies, a further analysts of this proposal has not found any appreciable change of conditions sin..e the last review in August of 1986. Therefore, staff has provided Resolutions of Denial for this project for the Commissions review and consideration. 11. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A Action Requested: Amend the General Plan from 'Office' to L� e from90ffice /Proffeessional• (Op �to Neighborhood Commercial t(NCaD and lssut xe of a Negative Declaration. �214 ITEH P PLANNING COM ISSIO, (AFF REPORT RE: GPABS -CIA, ODA 87 -11 January 27, 1988 Page 2 B. Location: Southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman venue. C. Parcel Size: Approximately 3.45 acres. 0. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning. North - Church and single family residential; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). South - Multi - family apartment complex; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). fast - Service Station and Office Buildings; (Office /Professional). Wait - Library and Lions Park; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). .. E. General Plan Designations• ro ec s e - cTi North - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Restomitial (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Office West - Civic /Community and Parks F. Site Characteristics: The site is covered with annual weeds and grasses an3—g`e­nTTy slopes in a southerly direction. There are no existing structures on the site, but a two -way access drive with median island bisects the property in a north to south direction to provide access for the ,multi- family apartment complex directly adjacent to the south of the project site. III. BACKGROUND: On July 16, 1986, the City Council directed that five ce ro essional sites end one Commercial site be studied by the Planning Commission for possible General Plan Land Use changes. The City Council did not give any special alternative land uses to be considered, but requested that the Planning Commission study the sites identified and provide recommendations to the City Council. The project site at the southwest corner of Base Line Read and Hellman Avenue was one of the five sites identified by the City The Planning Commission reviewed the five sites at their meeting of August 27, 1986. In the review of the Base Line /Hellman site, three alternative land uses were considered: 11 Medium Residential 2)Neighborhood Commercial 3)Office. The Commission determined that multi - family residential would not be appropriate adjacent to Base Line and therefore, was not in favor of the first alternative. Likewise, the Cea®ission was opposed to the second d �{J PLANNING COMMISSI01 'AFF REPORT RE: GPA88 -OIA, DDA 87 -11 January 27, 1988 Page 3 alternative to Pefghborhood Commercial. The Commission concurred that the site was c difficult one to develop. Their carcern was that to redesigaate the site to d more intense commercial use would only magnify the already existing problems. As a result, the Commission concurred, as a process of elimination, that Office would have the least impact and was the appropriate choice. The consensus of the Commission was to recommend to the City Council t...st this site retain its Office designation. At their coeting of November 5, 198E, the City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recomm endations regarding the various sites for possible redesig:iation The City Council concurred with the planning Commission dnalysi; of the Base Line /Hellman site, and they chose not to change the sites existing Office designation. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESthEMT: staff has conducted a Preliminary Environmental sessmen nitial Study per the requirements cf the California Emiromientat Quality Act and has determined that this project could result in significant adverse effects resulting from both soda- economic factors and health, safety, and nuisance factors. As a result, staff cannot make a finding of no significant impacts and would recommend against the issuance of a Negative Declaration with this project. V. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS: A number of design constraints restrict Vie develo5EFFE—p—M—Afial of this site. Base Line Road is a heavily traveled thoroughfare. The Base Line /Hellman intersection is a moderately impacted intersection. At peak hour, of use (weekday morning and evening rush hours), traffic movement wilt back up into the existing driveway on Base Line Road. Also, the access potential off Hellman Avenue Is severely limited The site's relatively short frontage along Hellman (295 feet) restricts driveway locations because drive.tays must maintain a minimum distance of 200 feet from Base Line on the west side of Hellman. Secondly, access from Hellman is limited because of Hellman's configuration where Ole street bottlenecks at the railroad crossing. A third factor that constrains development potential of the site is the existence of a multi - family apartment complex adjacent to the south of the project site and the attainment of reasonably compatible land uses. Due to Hellman's configuration, the apartment site could not access off of this street. This left this site with direct access only to Base Line Road. In response, an access easement was obtained by the apartment site through the project site to Base Line. The resui: 1s a two -way driveway across the entire depth of the project site that, essentially splits the property in half. Race PLANNING COMISSI01 'AFF REPORT RE: GPA08-OIA, DDA 87 -11 January 27, 1908 Page 4 In the analysis of this proposal, staff has identified three specific issues. They include: 1) land use, the appropriateness of the site for commercial designation; raffle /access, traffic circulation and ingress /egress issues rela x o s e specific criteria; and 3) market /anaylsls, to determine the economic feasibility of the s ee off or a cowercfal rather than office use. Land Use: In comparing alternative future land use options for the pro ec site, an unavoidable consideration is the existence of the adjacent multi- faai5y apartment complex. Due to unique design constraints previously highlighted, this apartment complex must share access with the project site. The present configuration between the two sites would require a substantial buffer from whatever is ultimately developed on the project site. In their previous review of the proposal to redesignate this site as commercial, the Planning Commission determined that multi- family residential would be an inappropriate use because it was undesirable to locate higher density residential units so close to Base Line Road. The City's goal for land use as per the General Plan (Page 12) is, Land use shall be managed with respect to location, timing and density /intensity of development in order to be consistent with the capabilities of the City...' A stated objective to this goal is to, 'Organize land uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses.' The Coralssion felt that to redesignate the site to a land use that permits a greater intensity of use would only magnify the existing problems and would not be consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Therefore, the Commission did not recommend redesignation of this site to Neighborhood Comerclal. In staff's opinion, since the time of the Commission's previous review to redesignate this site to Commercial, very little, If any, of the conditions have changed. The issues and resulting analysis as determined by tte Planning Commission with their previous review are still valid today Traffic Circulation - The Applicant had Greer and Company Engineers prepare a trcffic study to address the traffic issues associated with this site. Staff's primary concern is that Commercial 1s a more intense land use than Is Office /Professional. With intensified land use comes increased traffic. The traffic study compares the traffic impacts associated with the site under four conditions: (1) Under current conditions with no existing development on the site, (2) With the site built out with 40,000 square feet under the Office designation, a�i S PLANNING COM!ISSIO. IAFF REPORT RE: GPA88.01A, DDA 67 -11 January 27, 1988 Page 5 (3) With the site built out with 31,000 square feet of Commercial /Retail Use, and (4) With the site built out with 31,0000 square feet of Coamerctai /Retail Use, including a 6,000 square feat convenience store. The traffic study looked at what would be the '.raffic conditions both in 1989 under the four alternatives, and also the traffic conditions in the year 2010. The results of the traffic study are that for 1989 the traffic circuiation system, i.e. Base Line Road and Hallman Avenue would be moderately impacted with development of the site. Out, the intersection would still be operating at a better than acceptable level of service. In comparison of traffic impacts of commercial development versus Office development, the" traffic study concluded that more daily traffic would result from Commercial rather than Office use, but there would be no significant difference to the operating level of service of the traffic system resulting from either the Commercial or Office use. Likewise, to 2010, the study concludes that the traffic system will be heavily Impacted by that time due to City bu(td -out, and whether there is an Office project, Commercial project, or no project, it will have little impact as to the overall condition of the traffic system. Again, in the comparison of traffic impacts of Commercial development versus Office development, the traffic study concludes that more daily traffic would result from Commercial rather than Office use, but there would be no significant difference to the operating level of service of the traffic system resulting from either the Comrrcial or Office use. In analyzing the results of the traffic study, certain points rust be kept in mind: (1) The Traffic Study only considered the effects of the potential site development alternatives as they relate to impacts to the peripheral street system, i.e. off - site circulation. (2) There are a number of on -site traffic issues that must be considered with this pro ec : (a) The project site shares access with the adjacent apartment complex to the south. With Ccarerclal uses as opposed to Office uses, there would be a greater amount of on -site truck traffic for delivery purposes leading9 to a greater number of traffic conflicts with aut000bile users. a1.Xg er 7Yy,C v PLANNING COMMISSIO rAFF REPORT RE: GPA88 -01A, GDA 87 -11 °r January 27, 1988 Page 6 z. ° (b) Commercial use produces the greater number of trips 1. to and from the site then would office use. With the shared access with the apartment complex the greater number of trips onto the site would increase traffic conflicts with the apartment users. (c) Office related traffic is generally on week days during business hours. Peak use is at morning and evening rushes with limited use at other times Commercial traffic occurs during weekday business hours as with Office, but will also occur during the evenings and /or weekends. Therefore, increased traffic use is extended over a longer period of time and would result In increased impacts to the apartment users and users of the center as they traverse both on -site and off -site. (3) Finally, the traffic study indicates there would be no significant d0ference between Office and Commercial uses in terms of traffic impacts. However, in assessing this conclusion one must understand the assumptions on which the comparison was made. In this study, commercial use is based on 31,000 square feet of development while in the Office development it was assumed 40,000 square feet of develoWnt. Also, the traffic, study was completed under an assumed office mix of 30 percent financial, 50 percent medical /dental, and 40 percent general office. In the generation of traffic numbers general office results in the least impact, with financial and medical /dental having significantly greater impact in the term of number of trips generated. If the office mix were recalculated in greater favor of general office at the expense of medical /dental and financial the traffic numbers would be changed that could possibly alter the level of significance between commercial and office uses of the site. Market Anal sis - The applicant indicates that he is requesting Ms c ange ram Office to Neighborhood Commercial because it is his belief that there is not sufficient demand to absorb 30,000~ square feet of professional office space that would be provided if this site was completely built out as office use. At the City's request, the applicant provided as part of this proposal a market research study to compare the existing market conditions between office and rommercial use. The findings of the study indicates that the existing supply of office (Community - scale) has approached the paint of equilibrium and it is questionable as to whether the need exists to absorb the additional square footage that would be provided with this aa9 PLANNING COMMISSI01 AFF REPORT RE: GPABB -OIA, ODA 87 -11 January 27, 1488 Page 7 development as office. The study indicated that etere is strong market potential for certain commercial retail uses such as family restaurants, speciality food stores, and apparel shops. A question of the market study concerns the basic assumption under which it was compiled that if the site were to be left with its current office designation it would be developed 100 percent as professional office use. This is a questionable assumption. The office /professional zone of the Development Code permits a number of service /retail uses within the office designation. The office designation has a flexibility of available land uses to permit the development of a mixed - use center, and is not confined to ,lust the development of professional office space. A key point to consider, however, is that the service /retail uses permitted under Office are of a low intensity type that would be more compatible with the adjacent residential uses. The Neighborhood Commercial designation permits a.number of higher intensity type of uses that would not be as compatible with the adjacent apartment complex. A final concern of the market area used to assess need was the project site Thus the area south of Banyan only. Ti that resides north of Banyan th the services provided on the s market study, that if the entli Line and west of Haven wa T then be sufficient demand additional office space? study 1s that the market study based on a 1 -1/2 mile radius of ;Ludy areas wss confined to the ere is a significant population at could potentially make use of ite. A question remains of the 'e population from north of Base TGded in the study, would there to warrant the provision of VI DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT ANALYSIS: State Law requires that 'hie Development Districts, .e., Zoning Ordinance, be consistent with the General Plan (Section 65860, Government Code). if findings can not be made to warrant a General Plan Amendment of the site to a Commercial land use designation, similar findings should also made regarding the proposed Development District Amendment o. the site to Commercial development district to maintain this requirement of consistency. VII FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to recommend approval ^f this project, they must find the following: I That this project Is consistent with the land use policies of the General Plan. 2 That this project would be 1� the test interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the ci'lzens of Rancho Cucamonga .?jO PLANNING COMIISSIO: ,'AFF REPORT RE: GPA88.OIA, DDA d7 -11 January 27, 1988 Oage 8 3. That this project would not result in any significant adverse impacts to persons and ,roperty in the vicinity of the project site. Viii. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has beer, advertised in the Deily Report ewspaper as a Public Hearing itew, all property owners wf0in 300 feet of the project site were sent direct mail Public Hearing Nctices, and the property was posted with a 4 foot by 8 foot large notification sign per the City suppicaental noticing requirements. IX. RECOM(ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Camission To— - f -ire City Council resolutions recommending the denial of this project for the reasons as stated in the resolutions. If the Commission concurs, then the adoption of the attached resolutions would be appropriate. ect le y� ' Brad Buller City Planner BB:BC:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location /Surrounding Land Uses Exhibit "B' - General Plan and Development Districts Exhibit "C' - Development District Amendment Map Exhibit "D' - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit "E' - Applicant's Statement of Justification Exhibit 'F' - Traffic Study by Greer and Company Exhibit "G" - Market Feasibility Study by Urban Research Associates Resolution of Denial (GPA) Resolution of Denial (ODA) as) G� k%'OK.rH CI lam' OF ME`I, GPA_ BB- CIA /DDA 37 -11 RAINCHO CLKANTO.NICiA TmE LGCATIGIJ /SURRDUNDIDfG LAt� IiSE' PLANNM DiVEM EXHIBIT-_K SCALE- a 3l. 0: SITE General Plan Oi 11 A005M CA t CITY OF R.-'L.. CHO CUC-kmONC;A MANNING DIVMON SITE Development Districts v� NORTH rrE%,It GPA B3- OIA /DDA 37-II UUMur-F TIT1E tDEVELOPMEXi -r D /57RICT5 EXHIBIT, Fj SCALE aza s. TY 15 r r C 11 —�_ o sue• — r •r tom'+' .�' Qi r ♦ O A r ryre r0 • ,,L .. Y 6c f 0 RI i � I L1611MK �. I ® rr ' i / ♦♦ y .I �•: „� �.o' •' :... ! 0393 •• � „ Jy , rr ;arc .v CITY OF RANCHO CL'CA.NIONC A R.AN ING Ix MON D .,.w..YY„ .... V /Noxriiv\ n-Em, GP?, BS- QIAMDA 87 -II TnU,DEVEIDPMEUT DISTRICT AMEAIDMENT NIA? EXHI&T- C SCALE, a64 I, R�ti p CUCAMWcA MPUNIN aas �wr(� ANY Ics✓�r (///�4 \ \� Y T�GpQ POSED SITE PLAN EXHIBIT b —SCALD JUSTIFICATION WITH REASONS FOR AMENDMENT Applicant requests that the General Plan Designation and the Zoning of the subject property be changed from Office /Profebsional District (OP) to Neighborhood /Commercial Diatr -ct (NC). The site is a 3.45 Piro parcel proposed to be used as a retail /service commercial center and is int-inded to provide day- tc-day conven- ience shopping and vervices for office personnel and residents of the immediate neighborhood. The proposed change is requested for the following reasonal 1. With the existing OP General Plan designation and zoning, ttwse parcels would support at least 40,000 square feet of professional /administrative offices. However, at this time, there appears to be a large vacancy factor in the existing office buildings in the immediate vicinity of this site. There is no need or demand for additional offices. Z. The city of Rancho Cucamonga will be moving its facilities from the immediate area within eighteen months creating an additional supply of professional /administrative offices. 3. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has planned the development of a substantial office / professional district on Haven Avenue which is drawing a large number of the professional uses away from the subject property. This will continue to draw those pctential tenants for the foreseeable future. 4. There will probably always be some demand for certain local professionals eLeh as family doctors, optometrists, den- tists, and family lawyers. Although this demand could not fill a 40,000 square foot profesaional building, it would be adequately accommodated by the proposed project. The proposed project is designed to attract professional and personal service tenants as well as retail tenants. 5. This property is located in the center of an establisued office /professional /residential area and would provide day -to -day convenience shopping and services for tt^ office personnel and residents of the immediate neighborhood. 6 The designation of the two parcels as Neighborhood/Com- mercial weld require the two parcels to be developed in a consistent, unified pattern. aVO %,::x►A►qA-r MFIV„ 721 South %la8noba Avenue _ Anaheim Caldarrm 92a74 Di c}y 0? fit : :[4 - rp (7147952-0886 ro WKWp (714)9S2.317S ENGINEERS 6 PLANNERS Jammysl988 a 1F8 tir. Jascs Carter Jams Carttur Devalcpestt c=pany 888 North thin Street, Santa Sol Santa Ate, CA 92701 Ice:: Traffic 1R;ect Analysis in COclec+lm vi-2 tho Prtpoaed NaighborYbood O=Ourial Project an t^a fail ast Cosec• of Baseline and FALlmn Avaeae in thtt City of lhrv:ho CVcamorla, California (219 -01) Dear NQ'. Carter: AA at.M.nrized, we are pleased to stibmit thin traffic 4={m= analysis in cavlecticn with the jaspcaoi Naighbminod ®curial project on the scud ast c=nar of Baseline and Hallman Avw= in the City of Rarldw CUeamalga, California. The analysis examinee the irpacts of the rtapcead .,xvject on tha intarueotim at Paraline and Hallman Avw= with the devalcp , of the project site at neichbciwod O=rCial Instead of the present professional office zatinag. In addition to evaluating an office develcpeent for c=parisat proposes, tw2 alternate dsvelopsent plane tiers evaluated—ale as all rwi%%bor210od retail uses, and a secrd with a food market or catvenience store integrated with neirfnbodwci retail t_-As. ate analyses also addxgs the affect of lass -by traffic on typical trip generation rates for retail wwwing centers. Me ?rcpxed project consists of a zone flange fram professional Office zenirlg to n>aighboziwod ®rfnrcial for the defclepoant of 30,100 sq. ft. of neighbotlwod retail lses. A deve1cpmant alternative providing for 25,100 sq. ft. of neigtbori`aod ratan uses atd a{proxlrataly 5,000 sq. ft. of cenvtnienct store use aa*? Mr. Jamas Carter James Canter Devalopemt CMgWW Traffic ripeet Annelyjis Neighborhood Commercial project Bacelira and Hellesn Avenue December er 30, 1987 - page 3 wax ar4lyred. A project vicinity rap and site plan axe shown in Figu nw 1 and Z, res4,activaly. WoLusaion with the city staff resulted in the detain nation to confxt p.m. pock boom onelyses for the intarsec irn of Baseline and FALIman Avv=s and to Maxim project access cparattons. Greer A Cu. staff observod traffic apamtiar and CMAIU-'td p.m. peal: hoar tarting lnvessnt counts am 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. on Monday, December 28, 1987. The existin7 turning movement volnnmes for p.m. P"k hcute arc shower on Figure 3. Projected buildont traffic volumes seen obtained favor the City Traffic Rrpinar and used fcr an analysis of expected future conditions. Based on e:dsting intersection gwmctrics and signal operatics, the intersection capacity analysis ias cot-ducted toning the Intersection Opacity Utilization (jai) (1) methodology. Tablo 1 presents the voluls,- to- capacity (V/c) ratios and levels of service (LM) for the stx1y intersection wrier arrant ((edition. tIder existing conditlens, the intersection of Baaelins and Wlman Avenue operating at a high level of service with IDS "C' and a V/C ratio of 0.706 during the p.m. peak hour. (1) "&rlcying Intersection Estimate Overall Level Magazine, July, 1974. Capacity Utilization Volume to of Service ", Traffic Engineering a38 I A VICINRY MAP 1 239 �, �r i i aa. 4� FICU a SITE PLAN I�Lg11U q�r1U .1i 1 A t, W 1' b i fn h �_ 673 /��fn /"2aE� / 20 6 ! ��yy / nVOp //3//3 ��3 //� '�•� �� �� t�ri N LFftNn CIO 0 0 p Zl�J d 7T0-p /7.e��? YosT. Q'EGT AGr• � A<rz E�'i�Nb 1sAi /989 / �O�p ZOJO zo /O FIOUnk Fwqaw TRAFFIC VOLUMES 3 (1) V/C - volume-to-capacity ratio � Iffi - lmrel „r nor„ioa Source: Greer i Co., Engineers and Planners. a 4 Q +e rx. James Carter Jamm Carter Davalcpant Company i Traffic D%=t Mtalysia tteir¢rtnsttoal 03100srcial Project Y9 Beaallro and H&Uman AVWm r x Jaruuy 8, 1988 - PUP 6 TABLE 1 ntIt35D=CN fAp]•CM MALYSE4 —EXIS IG, PPE -PFWM kM POu•T- 0DJECP ' Trattia Mznct M+a1w�Ln— ri�i��'4tai�cod Gta��*�'S.t PM act a r..r., -= i... •— Brralinr and Hallman Avery n. ' �4 rh.. Nith�tim , r _P_t41. �ji{PPaalk IL lid'-" WC Misting 0.706 C 0.677 B 1989 No Project 0.724 C 0.690 0 20:0 v/OP Project 0.893 D 0.852 D Alternative 1 (OP zona/of:iu): 1989 v /OP Project 0.773 C 0.739 C 2010 v /OP Project 0.893 D 0.852 D Alternative 2 (Hoigt toxtnod Canwxcial)t Poet-Project. (1989) 0.764 C 0.730 C post project (2010) 0.888 D 0.848 D Alternative 3 (:4eigttboxttood'oatvcttiencu commercial); Post- project (1989) 0.78%) C 0.746 C Post -PMW- (2010) 0.899 D 0.859 D (1) V/C - volume-to-capacity ratio � Iffi - lmrel „r nor„ioa Source: Greer i Co., Engineers and Planners. a 4 Q W. James Carter James Carter d>•valcpacnt oxpan • Traffic Mgp&ct Analysis Neighbodxad owmarcia/ dbvject Baseline and diellman Averue Jan ary a, 1:88 - Page 7 pro-yr ^affic volutes wen determirrd by applying an annual _ factor to the existing traffic wlumee to accox- for rnrea.t'Y wTocted traffic increasae rewriting f m general regional devalopaent. She aural growth rate was determired by examining the differ=a botwn existing traffic nrUara as counted by Uas arrcltannt and the projected peak her volumes for 2010 and ealoulatinl the ameal increase for the 20 year Period betvsan 1981 and 2010. The growth rates ~sore calculated cta tha basis of directional traffic on BanAlim since the projected increase is diffarint for the eastbonad and westbound direction. WIN engnectod ampleticn date for this Project will be in 1989. Shorefnn, the ameral growth rates were applied to the mdstirq traffic volumes far a tow Year period to the 1989 target Year to drain the 1989 Pre -project traffic wkmm, which --mane. now Project built an the subject vita. pre- project traffic wluaea were also calculated and analyzed for the year 2010, is. projected buildout traffic Volumes inOltdirrg the Project sits built -out meter the op zoning. 11w pre - project traffic v0112e8 for both 1989 and 2010 are shown in rigure 0 for the p.m. peak hour. The intarsoction capacity analyses were con3'c using t`W ICU analysis a0tho<7ologY and 1989 and 2010 pre-pr9jact traffic volumes. Table 1 shows the V/C ratios and 1W for `he pre -prt c: =Xiiticrn In both 1989 and 2010. Under 1989 Pro-project conditions, the stadY inntorsection will continue to operate at a high level of seriica at ICs "C- with a V/C ratio of 0.724 during the p.m. peak hour. Vndw Projected bui2dout conditions in 2010, the study atex_cactim with existing 1ar2 900metry will deteriorate to LOS "IY' and a V/C ratio of 0.89] during the p.m. ; a1: hour. LM upn is an acmePtable level of sarviae for u:ban conditions, although the inte_sectien operations will ba app:oaddrq udesirable cPer ^.iaal conditions. a Y9 Mr. Jamce Carter JaarA Garter mvelcpment ampany Traffic Mvact Aralysis xeighb=hcas Catytclnl Prtjecc Berlin and liellsan Avrwe Jerrary a, Ins - Pew 8 un,srw. ztay GE9C77Lrf T_^iP S Watlon rates bead cn data anwa tzled by the irrtituts of nvwpertatiar avireae (rm) were utilized to estimate future trips that mould be 9w=ated by both an office project radar the Present OP zminp (Alterretive 1) aril for two altarntivw for the pnpoed project wader the pro ossi raxightrnirMod retail rrning. Altarnativa 2 Paqprse:: 3n 100 sq. ft. of rrighbodyool retail urea. Alternative 3 irrxeporates up to 5,000 sq. ft. of food stare or corrrairne store use ar3 25,100 te,. ft. of mood retail. In each caws, the affect of Pass -by trips was applied W the trip gereratim velum for the mighbortnod retail spate and in the case of the office Project, it was also applied to the ft.Mv"a uses. Pass -by Lips ate those trips that weld be using the Mjannt streets $,belles or not the project were dsvelcpad. Pees -try trips are cpporbnistic trips irstaed of domination trips, !e. drivers avail thrreelves of the opportunity to shcp at the refI*bodwod ratan storm because they were drivirg past the project anyway. rt£ trip rates and projected hips for all Uueo altermtives are presu*ad in Tabla 2. As sham in Table 2, the office project ()Llternative 1) Would generate ePPZ=dMately 1,989 daily trips, and O pracirataly 310 trips dwirg the P.m. Peak hour. BY omparlaon, the retail alternatives will generate slightly higher daily trips with Alternative 2 OVcW to gererata abort 2,839 trips and Altenmtive 3 about 3,173 trips. lkmmw, for the p.m. peak hour, Altermtiva 1 will W*Mte apprcodraately 310 trips, while Altarmtive 2 would be slightly lass and Alternative 3 slightly More at 275 and 349 trips, respectively. All three Altalmtives eill 9awrate p.m. Peak how traffic volumes within a seas of Only 75 trips difference. aqy Mr. James certar i Jam" Ouchm NAmlcpment OzWry Traffic ngmct Analysis r matercia trcject Baseline and Helium Aveve Jam ary 0, 1968 - Rve 9 7A= 2 Project Trip Generation Trnfllc 11vYet Arnlvel_..- a,.1ch�...a,.,w .tom...,. -� 7 P Ed5at VAL— rMjtz $1]s_ _P.K. In Prek Nam OUL . Alternative 1 — OP Zattnq/Otfioe — 40;000 of Medical off. 20,000 of Rat" per 1,000 of 54.6 3.47 5.17 Trips 1,092 69 103 Pifanclal 4,000 of Rates per 1,000 of 192.0 14.0 15.1 Trips 768 56 60 Peso -by 204 _]& =-U Z-U NE 614 45 48 Prof. Office 16,000 of Rat" per 1,000 of 17.7 0.40 2.41 Trips —283 _ 6 —23 7UM 2,989 120 190 Alternative 2 — Neij*c%tccd Retail •- 30,100 of •• _ _ - Rates per 1,OOO of 117.9 5.77 5.81 Trips 3,549 174 175 Pane -by 204 - 710 =—I5 _a NET' — - - - - - - - - - - 2,839 139 140 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Altornative 3 — Nal(ff ficnc( /Ox.vrnterno lWtall — 30,100 of Naighbar!.7ood 25,100 of R&ta; per 1,000 sf 117.9 5.77 5.81 Trips 2,959 145 146 Fass -by 204 =-M =_a =M NET 2,367 2.16 117 ConveAierr.s 5,000 of rates per 1,000 of 322.6 23.3 23.3 Trips 1,613 117 117 Pass -by 504 =M �5s NPP 806 7vM 3,17: 174 175 Hr. James Carter Janrs Motor urvalopeant ompa y Traffic 2mpact Analysis NeigSborirood 031narcial Project • B&"eline and lAUmn Averse January 8, 1988 - Pow 10 z 91:AinTF)CP_ 92MIfrr78 FCat- pcojact traffic Conditions senses that aithar Alterative 2 or Alternative 3 are deralcpad in liai of an office project for 1989 and 2010. 'Pte SCSI analyaw twrs applied to 1989 post - project casditicre. 'the poet- Psojact traffic volumes for the p.m. peak has are shown in Figure 3. the LOS valor and V/C ratios rater 1989 pat - project co litlorn are shown in Table 1. Under 2989 past- pcvjrt conditions, the study intsr"cticn at Baseline and lhllman Avenue, will continue operating at pars- project levels, ie. at LOB "C', fcr both AltaXTmtivv 2 and 3. For Altarmtive 2, retail &hope, the WS will be "C" with a V/C ratio of 0.764, art for Alternative 3, the tCS will M "C" vith a V/C ratio of 0.700. orris ompares to t08 "L." and a V/C ratio of 0.773 for Altarnattve 1. Any of the three project alternatives will innoew intersection volumes; nominally and will not result in a significant impact on lntarswtim operations. 'Ihe intenecticn will operate toter acceptable conditions in all throe cases. P,lildant OCrtit:iae in 2010 ware Lisoo examined with Altaratives 2 and 3 c=truetod in lieu of the office projscL un0ar the Op Zoning. 79e 2010 past - project voltmns are also dxwn in Figure 3 with the analysis results shown in Table 1. With the Projected traffic volumes for the buildout conniition of the entire City, estimated to Occur Appr=dmately in 2010, the stuiy intersection will deteriorate tO LOS "0" However, again all throe alternatives will operate at LM OILY' with V/C ratios of 0.893, 0.888 and 0.899 for Alternativaa 1, 2, and 3, rtr.poctivoly. All than projects result in the same relative traffic effocts, and none of the three alteratives will have a significant impact an traffic cparatiaxs. With the addition of an eastbound right faun on the eastbctmd Baseline approach, the intersection coals ,... r.lightly ,2q� Mr. James cartar James Getter Development Cknpany Traffic lbpect Analysis Neighborhood Cxenueial Project B&sar inn std Hal [ton Avuam January 8, 1980 - :age n improved in all cases. 71w sonata of this possible improvaunt am also shown in Table 1. 9,e PrcpoeGd Halle `^ Ayer access in eritial to the atueae of the ShCMing Center as loll as to improve eccaesibility to the rasidritial lvdts to the rear of the project. The reeidencam presently take their &=sea from Baseline aeroee the project preparly. Bac&um of traffic queued tip at the irn,armecti,n on eastbMind Baseline during the p.m. peak hour, it is sometimr diffiadt to make a wrtbourd left turn from Baseline into the PrOwlt drivw.ay &core. with the Hallman access, raoidents could sake their left turn from Buelirw Onto MitH=d Hallman aid then a right turn into the project, thereby avoiding the 'Ott torn oonflict m Bascline at the existing driveway location. similarly, asking a left ttrn exit onto Baseline from the Project and the edstlng reeidanors could be mach easier by oxitbV the prgweed Hallman drivsway anal barning left at ttx Baseline intarsecticn. For Purpceas of *his anllysis, uwas maiemrtta were assumed to be predominant during the peek hour chme to the voltaa of traffic on Ba alino and tha queues at the lntsrsaeticu• During net -peak hays, both the left turns in and the ler, tarns art could be m&Ia with relative Gass aid safety. +L11man AVtiramo is pmgr=ned to ie widened aid a nov storm drain ir:;tallad smith of the projaet bardaty within thf, next tdu yam• Striping on the south log of Hallman Avenue should Provide for a left turn lane northbound at Baseline with a mntiraaary two -way left turn lane scuth&rly to a distance of 125 to 150 feet south of the Project South property line Ono& the VSdeniirj is ompleted. Until the arpleti n of the widening and drainag�, Project in Hallman, a left turn lain should be provided northtmand at Baseline, and opposing left turn lanes provided at the project's Hallman Averse driveway and the drdv --day an the east side of wh%xn. •fie projects driveway should be located on the same centerline alignment with the existing driveway on the east side of Hellman. 2y-7 Mr. James rarter Jamul Carter pwalo{martt Conpuy Traffic rmpwt Analysis Neighooxhcad 020mccial project tivanline rand Hallam Avers January a, 19N - Ftga u 9�AtiQ. i�I� M'der odstirg conditions and unnher 1989 coditions with any of the than project altarnatiwn, the Essellnr/H lima-- Avenue lntarsecItion Will be operating atID6 "C", an acceptable Iwval of Service, during the p.s. pack hour. The I I project Alternatives 2 and 7 will rewclt in slightly laver and slightly hider V/C ratios, r+epnetimly, than the w_a project under Alternative 1. Any of thus three altarnatives will represent a nominal increase in ecdstirrri traffic volume and none will result in arty significant deeds m the ab.Iy inrtalvecti,on. Uhdar ultimate r.,c:dort conditions for the entire City .etimahnd to ocxr in apprcedmately 2010, the intetsocticn will be operating at rear- cVncity conditions at WS "p^. An in the case of the 1989 ccalitio s, all three altarfatives result in similar traffic mnditicrr. The intaxsertion will Operate at an aooeptable level of service with no significant traffic i� ,.eeulting rrm any of the three alterm.tdves. One potential irprovemont to aid interse^tioh cparatlo s would be to restrips the codstirg eastbawd approach to tie intersection to provide for the designation of a separate right tarn lane. Zho right tarn lane can be achieved simply by Seri ^iM the ahristing pavement wittX4& reconfiguring the present striping or widmWV the roadmy. The meant rm1my width is standard wk h and provides aped for the right tan lava. The Hellman Avenue access for the project is critical to the suOms= of local access for the shopping center and the access for 10=1 rtwidents located behind the project site. It allows for easier and safer access to both ahoppeta and resi&nts. TSe Hallman Avenue access Shahid be located directly opposite the edstirg driw%my of the east side of Hallmvn. Hallman should a48 W. James Outer James Car-tar Drralcpdnt Cvpany lrmffio'Irpact Malys" Heigl>bshood aaammuial Project Bmalira and Fellan Ave i Janiuy at 19" - 1" U be striped for P. lvxt twm lrer nottthbasrl at Daealins and, dosing left turn .lanes at tar Fallen drbmay to the project and the rodsting dritauay on the east sins. w nne Plsosrl to hmr barn of awistatwe to ym and the City of Rancho C%xwnVa an this project. If ttwr4 a.sv ecy qas:,iarr or amx2sr Please dri not hesitate to canto -t us. Faapsct&UY at*ALttwI Tarry F. Cceer, P.L. Principal IM st av2 1 1. . - -. -__ ..•_ --- ....... ,.,,n.. „w+ I City of promo CuteMOMe, Cellfernle ulRA i W., [MIM•n W Iluwrrt (219Wq ' I ItatlfM Md WLM Aw , T.M. TUY .................................... ............................... IOW OetuOrr 71, ulatiW C7OIITRICS 1967 I !219.01) 1 1969 ...................... 1 7010 1 I "IST.NO V/C I V/W 9ROUCT VIC I w 0 itme VC 1 n11"Clio" "me Comity VOLUII/ RATIO 1 V0..dl RASIO I VOtVdI 4tIO I Na•tMM•d T6ru 1 1790 1)9 1 D.1W I 191 I 0.707 I 234 I 0. at I I Iliac 149 1 t!5 1 700 155 I Left 1 I 18W 229 0.147 i 27R 0.149 i 506 C.193 1 Seutp6ard TNN 1 1700 in 0.104 1 161 O.ma I 701 O.ty I Night 22 I 27 I a 1 I lrlt 1 I 1607 19 O.Oti I 20 0.015 I 26 0.916 I SAtttwrS TNU 2 740 963 i 0.11T 1 907 I 0.525 I 1176 0.70A I Rf1Nt 11! I tr,t 1 160 46 I 115 1 1A 1 I left 1 1600•_. 4 0.929 I 47 0.0N I >d 0.077 I wetbaed Ttuu 7 7.00 677 0.710 j 719 0.223 j 1204 0.777 j I Alot 42 0.044 I 116 45 I follow 0.iW ; 1 left 1 1600 66 0.641 i TO 0.044 i AIR 0.074 I I Teti" 0 100 I Tollm 0.10 I Yellow, 0.10 I NO • 0 101 I WC • 0.724 I VIC • 0.695 I LOS C I t01 C I l0/ 0 I I IMTIASICTION WACIT7 uTIl1UTIOY (ICU) City of Rancho Oeaaq., CYlifomlN 01051 6 CO, OMIMeM W /lamtr4 !219.01) 1 I I88e11M en0 NvItW AVenr P.N. r2AR .... ............... ............................. WU VITA 9111CATICO ..... Oeee•ber 71, 1WNWTMNTS 1967 :� ............................ 5010 1 I 7!lfllYO I DINlCTIW LANNS WACIIT VOLLM S VIC I UTW WIN) 9RWttT VIC I V/ t'T Sul WC I I Voting 4110 I VOLJMCS UTIO 1 I Yort6bovd thm 1 17A 169 0.199 i 0.207 I 254 0.267 I IIIAt 149 155 I 20 I Uh 1 16V7 729 0.1t1 1 I 271 0.149 1 706 0.177 I /eutAlnuC v 1 170 ss ona I 1e1 I onoo I :06 anw j I RIONt 12 I 27 I 70 Leff 1 1600 19 I 0.017 1 I 20 0.017 I 26 0.016 I LuDaund tnry S 340 960 0.264 I 967 1 0.265 I 1176 0.766 I Rllnt 1 1600 117 0.071 I 117 0.072 I 170 O.VA I tr,t 1 160 46 I 0.029 I I 47 0.029 I 56 0 075 I wstho.rd Tnru 2 7.6 677 D.210 I 719 I 0.225 1 1206 0.777 I Rlo t 42 I 4s I 75 I 4.11 I '60 66 0.041 I 70 0.044 I 116 0.07, 1 I follow 0.iW ; 1 fell0„ I 0.100 I bllw 0.100 j I VIC • I 0.673 1 VIC . 0.690 I VIC • O.CR LOS 1 7 1 .03 1 I lCf C 1 ItltASICTI'M CAPACITY UTILI7ATIto (ICY) GXIIA I :0.1 IMI(Atere eM /hirers (219.01) I j I City Of Reecho CVte`r9R; wifomlo ALTtIVTIVI 1 OnnYr 31, '907 I I Onotlno SM Molt w Arw I.M. PEAK MM EXISTING am -tics 1 "1' ..................................................... I I I ............................... 1979 i 2010 •••` ........I I I EXISTIYO VIC I VIOP PR02ICT VIC I V/CM PNOICCT V/C . 1 Distrito LAN93 WACITT nAAAS "I10 I V7LMTIS PATIO I VOUlItS RATIO 1 1702 I ■ertmourw ram I 17C0 109 C.:99 1 272 0.245 I 2S4 0.. 1.? I ` Pigs? iN 1 193 I 2% . I law I Loft 1 1600 1 229 0.143 1 20 0.106 1 300 0..97 1 1 1 SPVtmv.,,6 Thm r 1700 175 I 0.104 1 169 I 0.117 1 200 I 0.140 1 I Nf91lt u . I u I 30 • I P I Loft 1 1440 19 0.012 1 SO 0.013 1 26 0.016 I 5 I tnttouLl ihr. 2 3400 964 0.7111 1040 0.340 1 1176 '0.7at 1 T I x1401 117 117 TAT 0.0661 I Left 1 1670 1 Left 1 11011 46 O.OM I O.OM 1 76 0.029 I 56 0.075 j cr I I 0.2:0 I I I 0.230 1 1206 I 0.3T7 1 I eight 1 VstttwR Thm 2 3400 677 0.210 i n' 0 1-, 1 4206 0.371 1 1670 I RIOkt 42 67 0.054 1 116 O.C74 1 I I I• 1 Left 1 1600 I M 0.04 1 I 4 O.Ou 1 lit I 0.074 1 v %C • Tell" C.100 I Yellow 0.100 I Tetlw 0.100 1 ' _. I V/C t I 0.306 I V/C • I 0.M I VIC . I O.M 1 Los C I LOS C 1 LOA 0 ' IYTUSICTIC" WACiry UTIUw1a tICU) UKAA 6 CO., eryfe"O" W PI&MOM (219.01) 1 II I CITY Of RWKhY CYCUw34, CAMCMIS ALTEXRATIVE 1 0eteeMr 31, 194 1 1 It90I1M Prod MetivV Avow ................................................................... P.M. PRIX OULAN VITA MITICATIM IM9AOVOMYTf I I I t9M- ..............................I 1 2010 I EXISTIM V/C I V/01 PROJECT VIC 1 v/to r4atcr WC I OINCCTito LUIS CAPACITY %MLLTMt RATIO I VOLUMS RATIO I VO LM/ PATIO I I Yor[hlgv4 IAN 1 1702 169 I 0.199 I 222 I 0.213 1 2K I 0.261 1 1 416ht 149 I 197 1 200 I I Loft I law 229 0.143 1 267 0.166 1 a00 0.193 1 I SwtnDO.d IDm 1 1700 753 I O.IOt 1 169 I 0.113 1 2CI I 0.7 40 1 I night 22 • I u I O I I loft 1 1600 19 0.512 j 2C 0.013 1 26 0.016 I I IoatliaPV thN 2 3207 966 I 0.764 1 tOtO I 0.306 1 1176 I 0.326 I I U9nt I 16M 117 0.411 117 0.072 1 fu 0.0661 I Left 1 1670 46 0.029 1 47 O.OM 1 76 0.035 1 I vuT09W rhN 7 3400 673 I 0.2:0 I 737 I 0.230 1 1206 I 0.3T7 1 I eight 42 1 45 1 >s 1 I lP /t f I 1670 66 0.04 1 67 0.054 1 116 O.C74 1 I I 1111w I 0 IN I Yell" I I 0.120 I TLL," I 0.100 1 I v %C • 0.673 I V/C • I 0.739 1 'V /C • I 0.C52 1 ' _. to$ t I asr LOS C I Los O � r; 4. A 7c 1 i1 r� R_ 1919eta4Tla1 CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) BRIER L CO., Gyi,wre NO Ptem•M (219.01) 1 _ I City of Ramho OxNe,,N, Celiftrnle ALT2•YATIVN 2 OKNa••r U1, iCST I NueIIM Ned Not lean Avaaw P.M. PEAK YOUR EXISTING L[pltTlies 1 " I 1 .____. _ MNT•96U![CT EXISTING VIC 1 I OIALCTIM 1 LAMLN CAPACITY VISIO[$ RATIO 1 I Nartm.,j Thy 1 Ina iM 0.199 1 I light 1 1N O.333 1 117 Left 1 16M 227 0.143 I I ta0A0Nled TAN 1 1100 153 I 0.104 I Tellw light VIC P 2i I C I LOS Left 1 1Aw it 0.012 I [astlwW "m 2 34M 966 0.:17 1 1 light 0.186 113 I 1 onu I Left 1 7A00 Q O.m I I watiaatl TAN 2 S" 673 0.210 I I [fah. 0.012 I 42 0.013 I 46 jLeft I [•t•IrirC ThN 2 Xw 1 160 Y 0•:41 j I I I O.XS I Te1(w 0.100 1 I 115 0.072 I 136 VIC • I 0.706 1 I 0.029 I 47 LOS C I 1969 1 .____. _ MNT•96U![CT VIC I POST. VOLIM RATIO I itt O.IIf I 1Y I r[ onu 1 to o.ra j 23 I 20 1 1C2S O.333 1 117 I 47 0.0" 1 740 I 0.271 I 43 1 as 3.073 I Tellw 0.100 I Tallau VIC P 0.761 I VIC LOS C I LOS _______________1 2010 I 9t0;[CT VIC I Vou9eS A TIO 1 2" (1...• � 192 I 300 O.tY I I 270 0.1 41 I 30 I L 0.016 I 11Y 0.364 1 136 I 36 0.033 1 1210., 0.375 I 7s I 122 0.076 I 0.10 1 0ma; 0 1 I IYT2lSI.TICN WACITf UIIlIGr10M QCU) WAR L Co., WMttre Ned Plamao 1219.01) I City of 4•nt60 CtcaMape, Glifsrnfa ALILRGTIVE 2 aaGNrer 31, 1"? I 1 SueIIM Ned "sheen AVetue 1 ... .. .......... ............................... P.M. P7A[ M(XA Wife OItIY:iO IWLWLYCMTL .....................1..... I I 7969 ............1 2010 1 EXISTINO VIC I PCLT•MOICCT V/': I •wCtUM[S[CT 1 I OIILRIpI tAMW w4:IlY MLIMy M40 I va1K7 RATIO I WtU1[y RATIO RATIO 1 1 Nargagved TIXN 1 170 149 I 0.199 I 211 I O.IIS I 244 I 0.236 I I Right 149 • I :x 1 192 I I Lott 1 1600 229 0.143 I 236 0.161 I 200 0.186 I saMtam'a rnN 1 170 us 1 onu I m I mu 1 210 I 0n41 I I Right 22 I x; 1 J0 I le't 1 taw 10 0.012 I 20 0.013 I 46 0.016 I I [•t•IrirC ThN 2 Xw 466 0.264 I 102! i 0.301 I 1166 I O.XS I I Right 1 1600 113 0.071 I 115 0.072 I 136 0.086 I I left 1 160 46 0.029 I 47 0.029 1 S6 0.035 I I I vnt0an0 ihN 2 Xw 673 0.210 1 740 0.271 I 1210 I 0.176 I I Right 42 1 AS I IS 1 I Left 1 lbw I 66 0.041 I I 03 0.033 1 122 0.0761 Tr IGr 0 100 r411a• I 0.100 I Htlw I 0.iCO I I I V'C . 0.673 1 VIC . 0.730 j VIC • 4.6:6 j Los ��' t I LOS C I LOS 0 I IETER97Wl0e COACT" UTILIZATION Mil) G IR S CO., tnSlml" wW Plaflners (219.01) I rfty at Rancho cucarvNa, Callfaenia AtrUMISVE 3 Oa9aoter 31, 1937 Easel lne are: Not town AseftN ................................... P.M. PEAK MOal ............................... VISE MITIGATION INkOVINI ITS I I •(t I IYIZAS2L: (CM CADACIA utit: Ullp ((G1 1 I W[J+ i CO., [ mev r9 ] Nq (2:i•)1) 1XUST[1f0 el Of 4a 0 CYC ty aawy,, eaiuofwl< u;ater••rt s ,ce, 311 0tt,ro.r n, 19e7 I e I d]et$he ana Y911a•n Ave•W - M.M. PEAR ....... .................. W= VISTNO 47CMST2ICS VOUpS I_ ' RATIO I I :.................. 119 I 0.199 I _ 719 t 1 0.266 I i�Yf' I c(I3Tta0 VIC j PCST-maj C7 We I M0J2Ct MIT Vic j u i Ol"ClIm LAMS$ WAVIT VCLLKS RAt(O I Mwg: RATIO I VCLVMS RATIO I ' I eartn0an0 Thm 1 1700 109 0.199 I 210 0.242 I 231 0.264 I I I RINt 149 I 193 I 100 0.072 I I 23 Left 1 600 229 0.143 I 767 0.164 I 366 0.191 I I 0.308 I 1173 �gtvtd Tutu t 1700 773 I 0.104 i 1D I 0.113 I 212 I 0.14. I 0.086 I I eight 22 4 0.029 I I I 30 I I wutnaM tnry 2 I Left 1 1600 t9 0.01: I 20 O.OU I 26 0.016 I 1. I n.tmw mfu 2 300 vu I 0.317 I for I oa:1 I 1173 0.376 j db eight 113 I 113 I 138 I O 100 I I Left t 1&00 4 0.029 I 47 0.029 I 36 0.070 I VAC . I 0 746 I V/C r 0.839 LOS 6 I LOS f I Vntb&Ad Lght a 3400 Q= 0210 743 0.232 1217 030 I I I 43 I 73 Left 1 1600 66 0.041 i 94 0.039 I 128 0.936 I Yellow 0.100 j Tallow 0.100 I Tallow 0.100 I I WC • 0.706 I Y/C • 0.330 I VIC • 0.399 I I "I C I Log C I LOS 0 I I IETER97Wl0e COACT" UTILIZATION Mil) G IR S CO., tnSlml" wW Plaflners (219.01) I rfty at Rancho cucarvNa, Callfaenia AtrUMISVE 3 Oa9aoter 31, 1937 Easel lne are: Not town AseftN ................................... P.M. PEAK MOal ............................... VISE MITIGATION INkOVINI ITS I I 1909 .......................... 2010 1 I I 1XUST[1f0 Y/C I Potf•Ptoitti we I POIT- PRO7lcr we I 0121Crl4 LAMS WLct" val."S RATIO I VOUpS RATIO I VCLLaNS RATIO I I Ma, NtnvW ihm 1 1700 119 I 0.199 I _ 719 I 0.742 I 271 1 0.266 I I Sight 149 I 193 I 198 I Left 1 1600 229 0.143 I 267 0.164 I 3C6 0.191 I I SeuNlxurd Tnry 1 1700 U• I 0.104 I 173 I 0.117 I 2.2 I 0.142 I I tight - 22 I 23 I 30 I Left 1 I 1600 19 0.072 I I 23 0.413 I 26 0.016 I I faactwuM YAM 2 AOo 966 0.284 I 1W I 0.308 I 1173 0.313 j I Right 1 1600 113 0.071 I 113 0.072 I 138 0.086 I I Left I 1600 4 0.029 I I 47 O.C27 I 36 0.039 I I wutnaM tnry 2 3000 67J 0 210 I 749 I 0.232 i 1217 I 0.780 I I nght 42 I a I 73 I I Left 1 I 1600 db 0.041 I I 94 0.099 I 178 0.080 I I I fell" O 100 I Is! low I 0.100 I Vollw I 0.100 I I 1 VAC • 0.373 I VAC . I 0 746 I V/C r 0.839 LOS 6 I LOS C I Log o I ®i X53 f • f COMMERCIAL CENTER MARKET ANALYSIS BASELINE AND HELLMAN SITE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALWORNIA JANUARY 7fI88 UPA URBAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 0 „�', , e COMMERCIAL CENTER MARKET ANALYSIS BASELINE AND HELLMAN SITE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Prepared for James Carter and City of Rancho Cucamonga January 1988 REPORT AUTHORS: Ray Young, Ph.D. William J. Lloyd, Ph.D. RESEARCH ASSISTANT: John Carroll URA URBAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 2565 E. Chapman Avenue Suit* 905 Fullerton, CA. 92631 ass c 0 CONTENTS Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Office Market Conditions . . . . . . . 3. E.iisttng Office Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Future Market Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. The Regional Offic" Market . . . . . . . . . . . 10. Retail Sector Pctentials . . . . . . . . . . 11. Trede Area and Population Base . . . . . . . . . 12. Retail Development Patterns . . . . . . . . . 16.' Alta Loma Frojocts in Pipeline . . . . . . . . . 21. Retail Demand Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . 23. Area Forecar s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26. _ References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 a i ■ 1. INTRODUCTION The construction of new retail centers, Offlco buildings, and public service facilities charactor'izae the evolving land- scape o• rapid - growth communities. Since commercial develop- - meat typically lwge behind the pace Of population growth, most new projects readily achieve market success, particularly if S they are sensitive to competition and are targeted toward cnnsumer needs. In built -up areas, however, one faces the constraints imposed by already - established retail, service, and office canters which define the range of one's options. Idsntifying appropriate uses for specific sites, therefore, shr..ld oe a major conceYn of the private- sector investor and public officials alike. This report presents the findings of a market analysis of a commercial site in the Alta Loma area of western Rancho Cucamonga The site covers 3.45 net acres at the Pduthwest]rn corner of thN Baseline AvenuR and Hellman intersection. The parcel under consldvration is zoned OP (Office /Protessional), a designation reserved top pro•esdional and administratrve offices or personal service hwsineoes. A general plan a,:undment a••u zone change to Neighborhood Commercial cla >aification are being sought by the property owners. The market analysis conducted by Urban Research Associate^ is presented in two Sections Chapter II e•iamined 'he as-) i office market conditions within the Alta Loma area, than compares thong with the office environment citywide. That section is followed by an assocsment of the retail sector opportunities and constraints pertinent to the site The retail analysis includes an overview of the population support for retail and service businesses( an inventory at existing compe•Itive shopping centers; and notes on commer- cial projr =ts which are in various stages of planning and development. ;?G ,g 3. ILOFFICE MARKET CONDITIONS The office market in the City of Rancho Cucamonga serves both regional and community scalo activities. In -scent years, a major regional office complex including a number of large multi -story office buildings has developod along Haven Avenue mouth of Foothill Boulevard. Proximity to Foothill Boulevard, the I -10 freeway and Ontario Airport are among the attractions of that site for firms which carve a broader regional market that in many instances extends beyond the boundaries of Rancho Cucamonga. Community -scale activities such as medical offices, branch banks and similar kinds of activities tend to be spread out in individual buildings or small cluster• located along principal thoroughfares throughout the remainder of the city. The principal site consideration for those office developments is good access to the local market as defined by rosidantial patterns and traffic flows. Bacause of the size and location of the site at Saneline Avenue and Hallman Avenue, any o•fice development for this OP -zoned vacant parcel would have to draw upon the community -scale portion of the ovorAll office market. In order to determine the market potential for additional ,afftce development, the URA staff completed a detailed field inventory of existing office uses for the Alta Lama study as 7 4 area in December 1987. Ths following section of the report provIdJ% A discussion of existing office uses within the Alta Lmma area along with an analysis of market potential for key segment• of the overall office market. " EN�ptina Offices C�'�rj,gDi The Alta Loma area contains slightly more than 240,000 i.quare fast of office space (Table 1). Of this total, 160,000 square foot or approximately two - thirds is found in amall to medium sized office buildings located on or adjacent to Baseline Avenue (Figure 1 and Table 2). The remainder - -somb 83,OOi) square feat -- occurs in conjunction with retail uses within the numerous shopping canters located at key interu(ctions throughout the area. Medical offices, which occupy about 25% of the total office space Inventory, comprise the largest air4le office category within the Alta Loma area ; Table P. Other important office uses include dentists, financial institutions and profesalonal services such as insurance, real estate, and law , B ass. Togethaw with medical offices, these uses account for over 160,000 square feet of office space or approximately 70% of tho total office inventory. Miscellaneous small office uses comprise the remaining 30% of the total. 1;60 Y TOTAL OFFICES 243,200 199,700 <43,500> Vacancy Rates 6.6 Ovortsupplys 17.9 Sources Field ourvay and demand modelling by Urban Research Associates, 00'ember 1987. r c?G TABLE 1. OFFICE SPACE INVENTORY ALTA LOMA COMMUNITY AREA ------------------------------------------------------------ Existiiig Estimated j Category Supply Demand Unmet Demand (square feet) <Oversupply> Financials Brea 23,000 Savings & Loans 15,100 tether Financial 19i60Q Total Financial 57,700 58,200 500 s.f. Health Caret Medical Offices 61,800 Dental Offices 1 ;AQQQ Total Health Care 74',800 73,100 <1,700> n.f. Professional Servicess Insurance & R E 20,300 Legal 9a40Q Total Prof. Bar. 29,70C 25,200 :4,500> a f. General Offices 65,000 43,200 <21,800> Vacant Office Spaces 16,000 TOTAL OFFICES 243,200 199,700 <43,500> Vacancy Rates 6.6 Ovortsupplys 17.9 Sources Field ourvay and demand modelling by Urban Research Associates, 00'ember 1987. r c?G Ij SI Y BAV ESQWJOH m r Q Ay y PIe9!4oJV Z m U w ti AV UM118H * t m¢ ~ LU U¢ c w z cr `� a° e cc m Z -, a O /- s uelleuJep c LL X W cc c' /• p7W- i•�, o Sources Field inventory by Urban Ressrsn Associates, December 1987. y ace s �i TaeLE 2. e EXISTING OaFICE BUILDINGS w ALTA LOMA AREA Building Area (Sq Ft) �---- — _ ----------------------------------------------------------- Y 4` A. Medical Canter 3,400 NW corner Baseline and Amethyst B Baseline Business Center 72,000 NE corner Baseline and Hellman ;. Forecast Frcfessional Center I8,300 BE corncr Baseline and Hellman D. Los Arcos 14,700 : SW corner Baseline and Beryl r E. The Exchange 47,100 SE corner Baseline and Carnelian F Rancho Cucamonga Medical Building 4,&J0 Carnelian south of Baseline Total, 160,100 Sources Field inventory by Urban Ressrsn Associates, December 1987. y ace s B: @. By comparing the existing office ease* inventory with demand v i estimates based on average per capita office space uses for comparable communities, it is possible to meaeuro the degree i to wh.ch the &rioting supply meets the expected demand. TM* results of this analysis indicato a condition of market equilibrium or oversupply for moat major categories of uses (T3ble 1). Thu predicted space demand of 58,200 square foot for financial institutions and 73,100 square feet for health care services are almost exactly in balance with the existing supply. Professional servicam show an oversupply amounting to about 15%, while the general office category shows an even groater oversupply -- 37.800 square feet or nearly ono -half of the total supply of general office spats. F_dS_uLP_tl2l1iRSSg0.g I t I an In order to understand the market potential for additional officr space in the Alta Loma area over the next few years, it is neroasary to consider the recent rate of offica space absorption, existing supply /demand conditions, expected growth of demand far offica uses, and planned additions ti^ the existing supply. The rate of absorption in the office market in recent ;ears !f estimated to haw been approx- imately 20,000 square feet per year. Vlawsd from this p&repec'lve, the 16,000 square fast of vacant office space in existing office buildings does not represent a serious ,2(p 7 9. oversupply. However, the other indicators of future office potential suggest that the actual market for nal, office buildings is likely to be small or non - existent. It is unlikely that proJected rates of population growt:. will support continued space absorption at rates comparable to those occurring in recent years. Mort of the area's growth has already occurred. Over the next few years, population in the Alta Loma arc& should increase by luss than one percent pc year. The market effect of•alow growth in office space demand is likely to be aggravated by substantial new additions to the supply. Two additional medical office buildings have bosh proposed for the Alta Lama area, one containing 25,000 square feet located at L'aselins and Archibald, and anothar with 6,254 square feet located at Baseline and 8cryl. In ad03tion, the expected relocation of the city government functions f -um its temporary spaces on Baseline near Hallman is expected to release an additional 25,000 square feet to the market by mid -1989. This total of 56,000 square fact of anticipatcd new and varatpa space, camh.nad with the existing 16,0..0 rquaue Feet of vaunt space, represents a potential oversupply of substantial proportions given the expected slow rate of growth in new demand. ��S lo. The Regional office Market � The overall office market In Rancho Cucamonga is dnminated by the emerging regional grflee complex along Haven Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard. This doncentration of medium " and large office buildings has become an attractive location for firms which - 2qu!re large amounts of spats or a morn l prestigious location, as wt:: as those looking for good access to the broader regional market. Although no accurate inventory of office buildings Is available, the overall supply is clearly many times that of the small cgncnntra- ticn found along Baseline Avenue. Some idea of the magnitude of davelao6nt along Haven can be sun in the more that 200,000 square feet of pro,lects approved in both 1985 and 1986 which have either been completed or are still un..rr development. Because the market is dominated by new construction, the typically high vacancy rater provide little uaaful information about market conditions. The absorption of new space through leasing agreements, currently running at an eotimated 100,000 to 160,000 eraars foot per year and doebling every two years, is a better indicator of the area s relatively healthy market condition. The av- ._ability of an ample suppll of modern office space along .favon may weaken demand for new construction along Baseline. Generally speaking, however, the two areas dvw upon very different segments of tha office market. d(A(u ..A ■ II. III. RETAIL SECTOR POTENTIALti The isolation or the property undar r_o.alderation tram the (. major offico area in Rancho Cucamonga, rising oversupply \. of office apace, ano the relatively small parcel size all } !,ply that retail bualnsscrn merit study as a devalopmant alternative Prropevtive customers at businesses in such a .:enter will be draun primarily from thu northwestern Por- tion of the city. Urban Resea -ch Ass.ciates thus has delim- ited a rolevant trade area to identify the levols of existing ano futura market support a■ well •s the pattern of retail ' competition. This section examines that cnnsumer support base along with the detiilod attributes of campotitivo retail centers in that trade arse. Retail laud uses as well as offices alo•td llaso.ine in t.lta "ma are supported almost exclusively by rrs�donta of nearby neighborhoods. One must ccn•sider various r,tmagraphlc rectors such as tutal population, household size household type, and income distribution patterns in estim /Ling commor- cial land use potentials. Moreover, interest should focus an thrse types of rotail or service uses which can serve a] anclors or maguots to give the center an ldotltlly and result- ing drawing power. A center of miscellaneoua uses, bo they office tenants or stall firms, often brings with it a host of potential proolems, Including high businops turnovor and :tnlnlshsd revent•e potential. .?(o 7 d t 12. W } Icg9r _9t:g ®_euA_2ggyleSigD_9aeff For this analysin, Urban Research Aseedlates defined the rectangular trade area shown earlier it is comparable to =' a community - scale' market areal that is, it extends .1 roughly one to dna and- a -ha.f miles from the property. The southern limit reaches ,lust south of Church Street, reflect - t' ;i ing ene snatlow effect of Foothill Boulevard development. Population dynamics for this Alta Loma trade area and for the City of Rancho Cucamonga are shown in Table 3. The approximately 35,300 residents in Alta Loma constitute about 42 psrcant of the city's total population. During the 1980s this area's pgPI.Atlon•'has increased at a rate comparable to that of the city as a whole (b.] % per year versus 9.9'.). opening of housing tracts in the planned communities of Victoria and Terra Vista since 1985 signal a Shift of the growth canter further to the east, a phenamerin which will continue through the end of this century Nance, Alta Loma will take on a 'maturing or settling -in' cha -acter rather than that of the rapid change wh -ch dominated ltd appearance between 1970 and the m10-1980s Table 3 also compares household characteristics in Alta Loma with •hose of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Based on figures provided by the California Department of Finance and Urban Decision Systems, there ors about 12,800 householdo today in .708 TABLE 3. CONSUMER PROFILES ALTA LOMA AREA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY Indicator Alta Lome Cucamonga Area City Population July 1, 19x7 Est. Total 39,330 04,000 1980 Total 22,360 55,293 Annual Growth Rate (%) 6.3 7.9 July 1, 1987 Est Households 12,830 26,400 Persons Per Household 2.74 3.17 Age and Ethnicity (1980 Profile) Median Age 27.0 2o.6 Percent Under Age 6 12.7 12.B Percent Age 6 - 17 23.3 22.7 Percent OVer Age 77 9.2 10.1 Percent Non - Hispanic White 76.5 78.3 Percens Hispanic 12.6 16.7 Employment (1980 Profir') fo al 10,314 24,943 Employees Per Household 1.32 1.47 White Collar Warksrsr Prof. and Technical ( %) 16.6 15.4 Managerial and Proprietor (7.l 14.9 13.7 Clerical and Sales ('L) 29.3 2B.8 Crafts and Operative Professions 29.0 26.6 hOusing Percent in One -unit Structures 90.6 78 3 Percent Owner Occupied 84.2 79.8 Notra, Age, Ethnicity, and Employment figures are 1980 con- ditions. All other data reflect mid -1987 estimates. Employment data are by place of residence, not placr of work. Sourcesi California State Department of Finance, Lrban Decision Systems, Inc, and 1080 U.S Census of Population and Housing. Parcrntage calculations by Urban Research Asgcc:ates arc 9 ■ 14. the trade area of the proposed car. r. The average f.cuse- hold siz.v of 2.71 parsons is lower than the average for the city (3.17), illustrating the begtnningc of neighborhood stabilization. Owner occupancy in the housing market and dominance of single family homes are also more charactoris- tic of thlt area than of the remainder of Rancho Cucamonga. Higher elevation housing districts and wall- maintained matur- ing neightorhoods are generally acccmpanlad by high Income , ' profiles, as one might expect. According to income estimata• prepared by Urban Decision Systems, the median household in- come for Alta Lama in 1987 was s 37,219 as shown :n Tahlo 4. For Rancho Cucamonga last year it was $ 30,476. This means that half of all households had incomes above and half had incomes below those amounts. The trade area median income thus is 22.9 percent above the median for the city. During 198", almost half of all trade area households had gross incomes above f 40,0001 the comparable figure for the city u.as 42.4 percent. tiverall, the demographic and income profiles signal a strong retail market - -- a largo group of young, though maturtno family - oriented households, most of whom 'lave liver in the area tar close to a decade or more but who no lor,o^ Can- Sider themselves 'newcomers.' Basic nec0S4ltles and such items as home furnishings and qual:ry wearing apparel are nigh priorities among this market segment. Dining out ;?"70 A w TABLE 4. ESTIMATED INCOME PROFILES ALTA LOMA AREA AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 1987 Rancho Alta Loma Cucamonga Item Area City -------------------- ---------------------------------------- Aggregate Income in Millions 6 495.0 s 1,112.3 Median Household Income 4 37,215. 4 30,476. Per Capita Income s 14,010. $ 13,241. Percent of Household Incomes{ ----------------------------------------------------------- Sourcet Urban Decision Syctems, Inc. update from 1950 census records and Urban Rarearch Associates Calcula- tions. X11 Below s 15,000 9.6 Y. 11.5 % 4 15,000 - L 19.999 4.8 5.6 s 20,0170 - 4 24.999 6.6 7.3 5 !Z,000 - s 29,999 10.2 11.0 4 30,000 - $ 39,999 22.8 2S 2 $ 40,000 - s 49,999 18.3 17.2 S 50.000 and AOOVe 27.7 25.2 Index or Alta Lama Area Median to C1t11 Msdla.lt 122.1 ----------------------------------------------------------- Sourcet Urban Decision Syctems, Inc. update from 1950 census records and Urban Rarearch Associates Calcula- tions. X11 16. lirumiso is a highly regarded activity, though quality dining experiences must to tempered with concern for value. ' Res911 4a�edea�rni_Qa22v�ne Residents of the Alta Loma community are carted by numerous convenience and neighborhood -level retail centers. Follow- ing the c.ty policy of nodal development, or zlustering, virtually all such centers are located at the int-rsoction of .� mayor arterial streets. As shown in Figure 21 tte most I prominent retat: clusters may be found at the ju•,cture of 3 d Archibald 6 Baseline; Carnahan 6 19th; and Baseline d Car - nalian. The detailed configuration of each �nmmerclal center is described in Table S. In tt.e aggregate, these cantors and a smaller number of freestanding busineslas, provide over 640,000 square test at shopping opportunities for the Alta Lama area. Vacancies are rare, underscoring the stability and strength of local consumer demand. Our field analyst found just 12,300 square test in vacant modules, far a modast vacancy rate of 1.9 percent. A rormal retail vacancy factor falls within the tour -to -seven percent range. True n9ighborhood-leval centers here are anchored by major Chain supormarioto and average 760600 square feet of gross ,ea =able area Virtually all incorparate a freestanding a-7a.. a%3 m x >� � T I— q x> x >p m >>0 N mm >Z m m .00 /0¢'c �b va c / ti /� ns v y x.05 S Carnelian(—D S St .�� O \J ca N (n CJ :r CD C y m* Hellman Ave n D Archibald Ave O O O D 4 CD Hermosa Ave a%3 m x >� � T I— q x> x >p m >>0 N mm >Z m m a to � H � I .J N a a wz U_ I J— M 0 Q W u Z W O I u 1 V O I x I J V I •-� Z 1 a C I w z i i L m « 1 c t M cc m c u u m L q • � u C ¢ L w w ( m L q Y Y u L r G I D R a C « m q U I a u ti N V I q 0 L « C C w m 6 O C~ 0 0 n c (C a 0 0 u x b m LL N w �a 3 m Y m m « P n 0 PO u 0 e u to .0 Ch 0 m em c M L 6 u YU N ]I N �• w oLE� L q M L L Y � w « NO�n O n ] N q D Y LY m 0 m L • 3 n q z w b L O c u P CCC @q 300 Svc c0h r L c 2 m P 0 u Y m 4 q L C 6+- 6 VL- q c W V N G M w w L w 8 1« a e m n m n gY: s« u� al°n 4 « "cm YI •'•m h O d m c 0 0. 01 d P 0 Qi - •+ n N n I m 5 -1 I gap w 0 I am •• I u « I a q I 0 I .• q La c I r q u I U L I \ a W I q c I Y i w 0 u I u q G I n z i a i 0 10 L �' Q m m m C C C CL m b L n a w w « 4114 1 W P. n L eia a .n Goa ^D D D pCpD .•q q q U q cIa ma a a z + a - N •. U u a u a u Y a •• a C L i s > G 0 C V L C L m L L L L i 0 a 0 L O 0 U _ u m u L u L t m Y W am MW «w L w Ow c z q z q C « Q P1 n w G V G W 1-79 G G Y Y w w a a; C « C c r m V L u L q a q 0 V L V U L C . G . m L h L C u U m CZ a 0 0 V > n w pO N M w C q q 0 N C q L �• q nV q • 0 0 J u io 6 E D m « C Y S w 1 N O 6 C J S Q n O 4 J T �a 4 .• J J 1< ro VJ s n� aJ Ic° 'f C ro a w a . ro N IL 0 0 � m0 A A � � 4 0 � n b C� G O 0 rynry Y Q ro l 7: 4 N a n C 0 ZZ 2s Inr L< A N r 7 O m O a 0 i 9 I ro n 4 J m 007 w no mg M� 7 Imo. T J IC r ro P P •^ P n n .�- r W 4 u 4 J � Oml Om0 J " e m O m Ci d T n>•n +I W A b S a A ro N 0 L J E O 0 S S ti« r e 4 0 m ro • S 6 S J 6 7 DI J O J ro E •r IO O n n > P Q 4 < O Y N r T ro J 4 J b M& � n Y W n 0 ro 6 4 I J O W J IC C C m 4 K •O m P. N ID ro T 4 S J C ro ass •+ 3 09 n r r 4 n r 0 Y T 0 J ➢NN N gmro 0 � = 1 1 N 1 I I b 4 I J I n o I C 10 i I I 4 7 1 C I N b 1 m 1 T n 1 N I N N I • I I I I 1 I I a m 2 n D rlml •'1 z0N aW n ji r �zm C� Dln n D D • vrr 02 AD •-I D D D D D 1 2D• � fast food restaurant. At several sites the neighborhood cantors are flanked by convani• ice cantors of 17,000 - 269000 • square feet. Convenience cantors provide space for lower- volume tenants and, in some instances, represent tie initial phases of larger proposed complexes. Since the fall of 1965, now retail projects totalling about ite,000 square twat have boon completed in the 41:a Loma area. More than 96 percent of that raw specs was occupied at thV time of our field inventory. This implies a commsr- cial Absarptidn rate of 50,100 .quare teat par year during the l..tast 27 month period. In light of the below- average vacancy fac'ar overallr•tho markot may still be underdeveloped r" in selected categories of retail and service functions. Ma,cr retail construction Lontinues alsonhore within the City of Rancho CucamongA. Two of the largest such Projects are the 13.1 acre Virginia Dare specialty center And a 15.3 acre community -scale center underway at Dasellne and Maven. The latter of these, Terra Vista V111499, is a Dicker- Warmington development which eventually may cwnte.n A9 much as 141,000 square toot of retail space. Since those and other s „aller retail protects along Foothill Boulevard are incomplete and still in their lease -up phase, vacancy and adsorption estimates or the city as a whole would be virtually maaningless. a 7 ca i. w zi. r 81ts_6as,e_PrasasSa _ la_Pierllaa City planning and building officials were contacted rogard- 1 ing the status of commercial prgivcts under construction and i propn&etl for the Alta Lome community area. Av of this writing, there are only four retail or office projects in r the development pipeline wnich may ba compatitiva to the center proposed for Baseline and Hallman. Charac`orictics of tnoav he•e been eutL nrd In Table b. the office proposals were d1scusa +d previously in Chapter II Although each of these projects lies within a half mile of the Base.inarHallman e3te, none signifies any ma,ldr charge to general market condltidns. The principal result will be an intensification of the commercial node at Archiba.d and Baseline. Southwest Sav_nga plans furttiar development ou its 9 S acre mixed -ufo property with the bulh of future Construction likely to be allocated to office uses. Welrick Properties also has proposed 39,990 square test of retail , -See to be built on 3.6 acres ,lust north of the existing Alpha Beta center. As with all types of Ho%elopment proposals, the realization or these 19 subject to some uncertainty Tim ng normally s delayed and land use cancopts frequently are modified. Honca, the project cha ^actlrietics shown in Table b should oe intaiprvted as a general market prospect rather than ai, an exaCt picture. Z% / Lz-7 a 1 Q! I P ✓ c L Zo> a > C � O • q w 0 .a. cam U 0 +0 ✓ q q u Iqi' o N u G a U ✓ u U O L r q 0• m u N U m A ✓m: rc c c 0 ✓ L L � y av U c u�ro a u N '1" I i u ©✓ m wrn I B r c o m L m» 0-4 u A I O» U m C 0 i I ; J n P q N a a. -• Pp 1 ra �m 0 1 Z 1 0r. rl c r L Z I I I N 40 I q✓ N a N am 4 u po m _ I 1 to \ q N a U a O c �' i � N•+a �maa au a I I I I U I N I m 0 O I U 0 N U U U .+q m I Ylq 2 u o 7 1 u I l v i I �// p W O ✓ RU I °.ro I m 0' Y• 0 h 2 I 0 w I :I c 0 V u L L �z0: i n y m-+ I «> Ln w 0 > 6 I q U p V O N H M I a I N h 3 6 � w w I 1 a I L Q. LI J I 0 I c u 6Q I O I uv •° u w� d � I J 1 n v •. Q i c t 0c u 2 I I U 0 c w 0 « W I C I L m u m N I 0 I i s i q Q, ✓ q p ap J I U I a l ✓ L» O •» d L I I R U I L 0 •+ 0 U l 1 I u I d q U p q U 0 I N I v N U W U u I O ] x Z M v UwM v YI q] 1 L E r pU I °: I I 1 I I O I I I � Lz-7 a 1 Q! I P ✓ c L Zo> a > C � O • q w 0 .a. cam U 0 +0 ✓ q q u Iqi' o N u G a U ✓ u U O L r q 0• m u N U m A ✓m: rc c c 0 ✓ L L � y av U c u�ro a u N 23. egt��i_QI�Q ®R:t_cg9v111ng r In order to detarmins the market prospects for specific �i iL retail uses at this location, Urban Research Associates t= simulated tna demand levels for key anchor -type tenants ii a and torn cempaietl r�sulte of that modelling with findings from the exietIP,g land use inventory. The demand modal i used by URA taken into account household characteristics and tUpical western Inland Empire expenditure patterns for reta.l goods and consumer Cervices. Findings from the modelling process then provide a basis for the eventual ° site development concept. The simulation was prep+rad for tunctiuns which typically carve as anchors or destinations in neighborhood centers. Restaurants, while not true 'anchors,' are major generators of patrons, particularlU where conditions do not land them- selves to a supsema kat anchor. Becausu of their abundance in the Alta Vista area. fast -food restaurants worn not includsd In the simulation. In aggregate land use terms both supermarkets and drug stores are in ipproximata equilibrium where supply is in calance with market demand (Sae Table 7i. In contrast, less than half the total market potential today is addressed uy e. :sting sto -es in the apparel and speciclty grocory lines. Famlly-orien +ed restaurants as well as ethnic or 12?4 , H i • TABLE 7. SUMMARY ALTRLOMA MARKETTAREA,EDECEMBER 1967N5 A - - - -- ----- ---- -- --- -•- Current Existing ig Functional Category Demrnd Supply Prospect - -- -- -- ia.i :L-- - - -Saa L 2- --- ---- - --- ------------------ 133,600 157.540 _ '•ocery Stores i Specialty Grocery • 6,200 - 3,040 H.F. 15,100 46,000 45,450 -- k Drug S•. 16,400 6,500 H.F. y'+ ADDer vl y� Fam11y Rostauranty 37,500 11,500 H. F. t Ethnic /Specialty Pestaur. 16,900 7,600 N.F. .1,lu'1os meat, fish, and poultryl frovA fruit and �eyetable markets; and doll outlets _______ ______ ___ __ _ __ ____ __ ____ Sourest Field and land wse dDwcombertl 19 ©7 q H i • zs. r htgher -and dining uPPOrtu•,t ties are undersupPlied by a witle margin S.-,ecialty grocers such as meat markets, dolls, and fresh produce stores enjoy good customer support in higher income areas comparable to Alta Loma. That grocery categcry aotualiy encompasses a wide range of aPeclalty typc►, in- cluding hralth foods and bakeries in addition to the product tines aleo4dy no -ad. Based on national norms, consumer demand supports between 992P0 and 7,6071 square feet at such stores for each 100,020 square fact of superma,ket apace. Therefore, t,e wlta Loma trade area currently is ,.ndsrsupplleo by _,200 - 12,100 square feet in the specialty grocery lines. 'hat shortfall nos boon accommodated to some extant by the greater - than- vepauted floor area of full -line grocery stores in this area where many supermarkets are likely to include bakery and dill departments. Restaurants, other than teat -food dr1�e -thru outlets, also represent a retail sector opporturity. Familj- orluntod restaurants appear to h6ve slight.y higher support than do ethnic or specialty aoterlds Regional chains of the first type, such as Soker'n Square, Coco s, or Ma ^le Ceilantlwr's are conspicuously ab7ant Clearly certain retal. businasset and ,asta.irant services o''er tra mariet support not found to, offtce••ty Pe uses ,28 e 26. Although a number a' service business types, including rsctauro,' -, =r4 permitted in the Office /Professional land use district, restrictive conditions accompany their approval For ev ole, restaurants which serve wine, a common practice among -attNr fam.iy restaurants, must pass through the con - ditionol use permit procure, incurring financial costs not associated with that- locctiun in Neighborhood Commercial districts. Moreover, two potentia: anchor uses at this lo=ation, specialty food stores or apparel shops, are disallowed under tne• currant land use policy. Yet, they currently have stronger market support than most alter- native fuhctlon6. 6PQd_Ec[9castg khan market analyses are undertaken in rapid- growth communities it is Instructive to know if future residential development may dramatically change the population 9120 tr character of the affect4d market area. As noted earlier, approximatelN 35,300 people live in the Alta Lcm. area of Rancho Cucamonga. The city's planning staff forecasts the addition of 8,717 dwelling units to the Alta Loma and Cuca- monga areas between 1987 and the year 2010 bu.1dout. The distribution of vacant residential sites suggests that about ono -thi -d of that number will be in Alta Lama. Multiplying the estimated annual increase in housing units for 'ha area ,114i timer, the average household size f2.74i produces a ass 27 rough estimate of the average annual population grcwth in- crnment for Alto Loma (310 p.irsons per year Appllcatton at that method to anticipated change between mid -1987 and 1992 Implies that five yaars from now the trade area will have a total population on the order of 36,900. That would be only a slight gain of 4.4 percent above the level of today. In sum, consumer support for local retail, service, and office land uses in Alta Loma five years from now will not differ radically from the T, prevent support bass. asa 28. '_ REFERENCES `lerrett, G. Vincent and Jahn P. Blair t19W_ Sa_ SseSysS _1D.4_Anliu:R_Brl1_ESetlSs (Nov Vorkt Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1982). Buller, Brad •SCAG Disaggragation of Demographic /Housing/ Employment Forecasts' memo to Kerry Forsythe, San Bernardino Associated Govornoents, May 7, 1986. Davies, R. L. and D. S. Rogero, ads. (Chic_ester1andNow YorR_Aaaxhn Wil_9sselcsh• (Chichester and New YbrY� John Wiley & Sons, 1984). City of Rancho Cucamonga, Community Development Department, "Monthly Status Report' (November 1997). City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4ssgasEmggi_�ggg. Chapter 17.12 'Commercial/ Of ?Ice Districts' (December In03). Urban Land Institute. (gashn_t_nea2s_sf_bas_SenSs[al_ (Washington( 7ha Urrban an Land Institute, o, 1987). Urban Research Associates. 'Baseline Economic Analysis Foothill Boulevard Corridor, Rancho Cucamonga, CA.' (Fullerton, CAs processed, July 1986). a$4 P �� Section 17.10.030 C. General Commercial DisWet (CCN This district is Intended far general — commercial activities and anrvlces of a more intensive nature. These uses would be located primarily aIW major transportation routes and would include major SMging facilities, major servico- oriented us0s, major financial and corporate headquarters which are designed to serve the City or the region as a whole. Section 17.10.030 use tatulstlow Uses listed In Table 17.10.030 shall be allowable In one or more of the commercial districts as indicated In the co`.umns beneath each commercial district. Where Indicated with the letter "P ", the use shall be a permitted use In that district. Where Indicated with the letter "C ", tlw use $hall be a conditional use subject to the Conditional 4se Permit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a g,ven use In W. of the districts, the procedure outlined In Section 17.02.040 shall be followed. TAM 17.1&938 on 1t GM ATIOl1S FOR COMMIRCIAWOPPIC: DWMCTS � 8in USE OP NC [1C A. offices and Related Uses 1. Administrative said executive offices. P P P 2. Artict and photographic studio,, not P P P ilntluding the sale of .equip cent or nippl.'es. ' 3. Clerical and professlond '.[floes. P P P 4. Financial services ano Institutions. P P P 3. Medical, dents and related health P P P services (non -at. mal related) includl. laboratories &W Olniesd only the sale of articles clearly Incidental to the services provided shell be permitted. S. Prescription pharmacles, (also when P P P located within a building containing the of flees of S or more medical practitioners) 7. Public buildings (Ubrary, city std county P P P buildirgs, special districts and post office). 9. Public utidty service offices. P P P 9. Public safety facility (police, fire, C C C ambulance and paramedics). � 8in Section 17.10.030 9xt4tgcT "H' Z IQ M USE OP HC GC 10. Related commeruial uses (blueprinting, P P P stationary, quiet copy, etc.) when Ineldnntal to an office building or complex. B. General Commercial Utes 1. Antique shop@ - P p 2. Adult business Gib special requirements - - C per Section t7.t0. -3 JO 3. Animal Care Paelllty (animal hospital, veterinarian, commrclal kennel, grooming). u) Excluding exterior kennel, pens, or C P P runs. (b) Including,exterfor kennel, pens, or - - runs. Q. Apparel stores. p P 5. Art, music and photographic studios and C p p supply stores. 0. Appliance stores a�.d repair. - C P 7. Arcades (see special requirements per - C C Section 17.10.030 P.) 8. Athletic and Health Club, gyros and P P P weight reducing clinics. 9. Automotive services (including motorcycles, boats, trailer and camper) (a) sales C - C (b) rentals - - C (c) repairs (major engine work, mufflor - - C shops, painting, body work end upholstery) (d) Coln -op washing C C C (e) Automatic washing C C C 9xt4tgcT "H' Z IQ M l+ Seeticn 17.10.030 USE OP NC GC (0 Service or gasoline dispensing C C P stations (tneludhq minor repair such as tune -We, brakes, batteries, tires, mufflers) (g) Parts and supplies - p p 10. Bakeries (retail only), _ p p 11. Barber and bcauty shops. p p p 12. Bicycle show. _ p p .t is. Blueprint and photocopy asrvlces P P P 14. / Boat and camper salu and services. - _ C 1S. Book, gift and stationary stores (other C p p r thsn adult related material). I8. Candy stores and confectionaries. - p o 17. Catering establishments. " _ _ p 18. Clearing and pressing establishments. C P p 10. Carpenter shop or cabinet stop. - _ p 20. COck`e8 lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment. (a) Operated Independent of a C - C restaurant (b) Accessory to s, restaurant C C C 21. Commerelal recreation faJUdes. W Indoor uses such as bowUng, C C p theaters, bMuds, (b) Outdoor uses such as golf, tennis, C C C basketball, baseball, trampollnes, etc. 22. Contractor yards (screening of Outdoor - - C storage required). 23. I airy product stores. - p p Section 17.10.030 i • i ._ 0 J I f l USE OF NC GC 24. Department stores. - - P 25. Dr(va -In businesses, Including theaters. - C C (other than fast food restaunlnts) 29. Drug stores and pharmacies. - P P 27. Equipment rental yards. - - C 28. Fast -food restaurants. C C P S 'f 20. Feed/Tack stores - C P 30. Florist shop. P p P 31. Food stone and supermarkets. - P p 32. Furniture stores, repair and upholstery. - P P 33. General retail stores. - p P 34. Hardware stores. - P P y 35. Home improvement centers. (a) Materle,' stored and sold within - P p encleeeo buildings (b) Outdoor storage of material such as - - C lumber k building materials 38. Hotels and Motels. C - P 37. Ice Machines (outdoor). - C C 38. Janitoral services and supplies. C P P 39. Jewelry notes. - p P 40. Laundry self- service. - p P 41. Liquor stores. - P p 42. Kiosks for kiy stops film drops., ate. In - C C parking lots. 43. Locksmith shop. - P P 44. Mini- storage for public use (no outdoor - - C storage). i • i ._ 0 J I f l Section 17.10.030 X90 Un OP NC GC 45. Mortuaries and cemeteries. C C C 48. Motorcycle sales and service. - - C 47. Newspaper and magazine stores, printing - C P a.td publishing. 49. Nurseries and garden supply stores{ - P P provided, In the NC district, aR equipment, supplies and material are I:ept within an enclosed area. 49. Office and business machine stores. C P P 50. Parldng facilities (commercial) where fees C - P we charged. 51. Political cc phl4utthrople headquarters. C C P 57. Pet ship. - P P 53. Plumbing shop and &WHes. - - P S4. Photocopy •' P P P 33. Printing shops. - - p 58 Restaurants (other than tut food). (a) With entertainment and/or serving C C P or alcoholic beverages (b) Incidental serving of beer and wine P P P but without a cooktail lounge, bar, entertainment, oarcing 57. Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard. C C C 58. S•rwe stores, tales and repair. - P P 59. Second -hand stores and pawn shops. - - P 00, Shopping Center subject to provisions In - C C Section 17.10.030 -P.5. 81. Spiritualist readings or astrology - - P forecasting. 84. Sporting goods stores - P b 83. Stamp and coin shops. - P P X90 J s ,ijyaf- tt(3CT ��� t; Section 17 10.070 y iy Un OP HC GC 4 yf 64. Swlmmieg pool supplies. - P P 65. Taller. - P P 4 66. Touddermists. - P 67. TolevLsinn, radio sales and service. - P P 68. Tire salss and service. - - C }Y 69. Toy store I. - P P 70. Travel agrneies. P P P 71. Trateportatlon facili4es (ttaln &M bus, C C C g tud depots). 72. Truck erd trailsr rental, sales and service. e'Y 77. Variety stores. _ P P r, i 74. Vehicular sto."age y &<• of d towing service. - - C i C. Public and semi- public uses 1. Day Care Paeilltles C C C 2. Convalescent facilities and hcepitals. C - C 7. Private and public clubs and edges, C C C Including YMCA, YWCA and similar youth group uses M1 4. Educational institutions, parochial, privets C C C (Including colleaw and universities). 5. L:: -4ries & museums, public or private. C C C S. Part and recreation facilities, public or C C C private. 7. Public utility installations. C C C S. Vocational or busines+ trade schools. C C C 9. Churches, convents, monasteries and other C C C religious institutions. J s ,ijyaf- tt(3CT ��� RESOLUTION NO. 88 -24 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PINING COtNISSION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP OF THE GENERAL PLAN, GPA 88 -01A, FROM OFFIC "t TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 3.45 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENUE, RANCHO CLX4MONGi„ CALIFORNIA, AND MAKE FINDING'S I° SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) James E. Carter has filed an application for the General Plan Amendment No 88-01A as described in the title of thin Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment request is referred to as The Application. (it) On January 27, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on The Applitation and concluded said hearing on that date 010 All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred •' B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth In the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on January 27, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The Application applies to a 3.45 acre parcel of land basically rectangular in configuration, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue Said property is currently designated as Office on the Land Use Map of the General Plan and is substantially vacant land except for an existing access easement that bisects the property in a north -south direction over which a two way driveway rith central median 1s developed; and (b) The pproperty to the north � the subject site is designated Lew Residential (2 -4 du /ac) on the Land Use Map of General Map and corsists of a church site and surrounding Sangle Family Residential, the property to the south of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8- 14 du /ac) on the Land Use rtap of the General Plan and consists of a multi- family apartment complex, the property to the Eas' is designated Office on the Land Use Map of the General Plan and consists of a Service Station and Office a91 FLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. e8 -24 RE: CPA 88-OIA Page 2 buildings, and the property to the west is designated Civic /Community and Park on the IInd Use Map of the General Plan and consists of the public Library and Lions Park; and (c) The application requests the Amendment of the Land Use Nap of the General Plan from Office to Neighborhood Commercial for the 3 45 care parczl, and (d) The application would not be consistent with the Land Use Elecient of the General Plan, could potentially result in significant adverse impacts to persons and property In tic immediate vicinity of the subject site, and would not be in the best 'nter2sts of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: (i) Severe site constraints limit the development potential of this site. Specifically, this slce must share access to peripheral streets with an adjacent apartment complex. This shared access requirement limits the site's potential to be buffered from the adjacent apartment complex. The Application would permit land uses of greater intensity than under current General Plan designation. Therefore, this Application has the potential to increase land use incompatibility of this site with the adjacent residential use, and this is contrary to the objectives of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. (ii) With the approval of this application, Ahe project site %oulc be subjected to land uses of greater intensity that would expose adjacent residents to greater amounts of noise, objectionable odors, light /glare, truck traffic, litter ano other nuisance factors. These conditions have the potential to result in significant adverse impacts to the people and property in the inroediate vicinity of tre project site, and therefore, would not be in the best interest or the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (iii) Based upon the substantial ev1.12nce presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing anml upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes that the atpl'cation wnuld not be consistent with the objectives of the Land Use Element of the General Plan tc organize 'and uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses would not be in the best interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and would not protect the health, safety, dnd welfare of the citizens o" Rancho Cucamonga, Califcrnia (irl In conjunction with The Application, an Initial Study /Preliminary Em4rorarntal Assessment, in confomnity with the requirements with the Czlifornia Environmental Quality Act, has been prepared; however. Commission has determined that this project could have a significant adverse effe-t on the environment, and hereby dacti -ies to make a finding of no significant fnpact and to certify a Negative Decla.atlon (v) Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends de;.ial of The Application and directs that a certified copy of this Resolution and related material be forwarded to the City Council for final determinatio, a93 PLANNING C"ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-25 RE: DDA 87 -11 January 27, 1988 Page 2 buildings, and the property to the west is designated Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) on the Development Districts Nap and and consists of the public Library and Lions Park; and (c) The application requests the Amendmant of the Development. Districts Mp from Office /Professional to Neighborhood Cocmercial for the MS acre parcel; and (d) The application would not be consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, could potentially result in significant adverse impacts to persons and property in the Imediate vicinity of the subject site, and would not be in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: (1) Severe site constraints limit the development potential of this site. Specifically, this site must share access to peripheral streets within an adjacent apartment complex This shared ,access requirement limits the site's potential to be tuffered from the adjacent apartment. The Application would permit land uses of greater intensity than under current Development Districts designation. Therefore, this Application has the potential to increase land use incompatibility of this site with the adjacent residential use, and-this is contrary to the objectives of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. (ti) With the approval of this application, the project site would be subjected to land uses of greater intensity that would e<pose adjacent residents to greater smunts of noise, objectionable odors, light /glare, track traffic, litter and other nuisance factors These conditions have the potential to result in significant adverse impacts to the people and property in the immediate vicinity of the project site, and therefore, would not be to the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (111) Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Coamission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes that the application would not be consistent with the objectives of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to organize land uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses would not be in the best interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and would not protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Rr,ncho Cucamonga, California (tv) In conjunction with The Application, an initial Study /Preliminary Environmentel Assessment, in ronformlty with the requirements with the California Envirmmental Quality Act, has been prepared; however, Commission has determined that this protect could have a significant adverse effect on the envlromaent, and hereby declines to make a finding of no significant impact and to certify a Negative Declaration (v) Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth to paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Conmistion hereby recommends denial of The Application and directs that a certified copy of this Resolution and related material be forwarded to the City Codncil for final determination. 12% _e P(ANNIMi COWISSION RESOLUPIdN N0. O3-25 RE: ODA 87.11 January 27, 1988 Page 3 (vi) The Deputy Secretary to this Commission, shall cvtify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TN DAY OP JANUARY, 1988. PLANNING C"ISSION C7 THE CITY OF RtiyCHO COCA4ORGA Larry . .c e , 6ndIrMan I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Conmission of the City of Rancho Cucaamnga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution leas duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adooted by the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucsa:onga, at a regular woeting of the Planning Comission held on the 27th day of January, 1988, by the following vote- ta•wit: AYES: COlM MIONERS: CAMEO, ENERICR, NCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COWISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COWISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY a 97 JAIMP CARTER DEVELOPMENT CU"ANY 888 North Main Street, Suite 801 Santa Ana. California 92701 (714)- 5439959 February 11, 1988 Mr. Dennis L. Stout. Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga Poet Office Box 807 Ranclo Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: OPA 88014 — JAMES E. CARTER DDA 0711 ° JAMES E. CARTER Request for continuance of public hearing of agenda Item 02 from Cebruary 17, 1908 to March 16, 1958 Dear Mr. Stoutt I requesc that the public hearing before the City Counsel regarding thi above applications to amend the gooeral plan and development district map be continued until March 16, 1988. As I indicatsd oi. he telephone, we are working to resolve some-of the Problems raised by the Planning Staff and Commission in connection with that project. Thank you. Yours very truly, . ES E. CARTER�� scg ■e I: 2gg RESOLUTION H0. $ 8-0 9 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL OEHYIHG A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS HAP. ODA 87- 11, FROM OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR A 3.45 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE SOUTHNE.ST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENUE, RANCHO CUC.+II(NGA, CALIFORNIA, AND IIAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208402 -43, 14. A. Recitals. (i) James E. Carter has filed an application for the Development Districts Amenda_.it No. 87 -11 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Districts finendment request is referred to as The Application. (ft) On January 27, 1988, the planning Cocnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on The Application, and issued Resolution No. 88.25 recommending to this City Council that said application be danled. (iii) On February 17, 1988, the City Council 0 the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on February 17, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereoy specifically finds as follows: (a) The Application applies to a 3.45 acre parcel of land basically rectangular In configuration, located on the southwest corner of Rase Line Road and Hellman Avenue. Said property is currently designated as Office /Professional o- the Development Districts Map and is substantially vacant land except for an existing access easment that bisects the property in a north -south direction over which a two way driveway with central median is develo ?ed; and a99 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. RE: DOA 87 -11 February 17, 1988 Page 2 (bl The property to the north of the subject site 's designated Low Residential (2 -4 Wad on the Development Districts Map and consists of a church site and surrounding Single Family Residential, the property to the south of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8- 14 du /ac) on the Develooment Districts Map and consists of a multi- family apartment complex, the property to the East is designated Office /Professional on the Development Districts Map and consists of a Service Station and Office buildings, and the property to the west is designated Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) on the Development Districts Map and and consists of the public library and Lions Park; and (c) The Application requests the Amendment of the Uevelopmrent Districts Map from Office /Profess.onai to Neighborhood Commercial for the 3.45 acre parcel; and (d) The Application would not be consistent with the Land Ilse Element of the General Plan, could potentially result in significant adverse impacts to persons and property in the immediate vicinity of the subject site, and would dot be in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follow:: (i) Severe site constraints limit the development potei.tial of this site. Specifically, tilts site oust share access to peripheral streets within an adjacent apartment complex. This shared access requirement limits the site's potential to be buffered from the adjacent apartment. The Application would permit land uses of greater intensity than under current Dev- lopment Districts designation. Therefore, this Application has the potential to increase land use Incompatibility of this site with the adjacent residential use, and this is contrary to the objectives of the Land Use Element of the General Plan (ti) With the approval of this application, the project site would be subjected to land uses of greater intensity that would expose adjacent residents to greater amounts of noise, objectionable odors, light /glare, truck traffic, litter and other nulsance factors. These conditions have the potential to result in significcnt adverse impacts to the people and property in the immediate vicinity of the project site, and therefore, would not be !n the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the either.* of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Based upon the substantial evide ce presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes that the application would rot be consistent with the objectives of the Land use Element of the General Plan to organize land use, to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses and would not protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, Ctlifornia. 'Boo _<� ,- .... Fj r� .i r74 t'l.%�•i � sr� N -cam - _ . � � - � .. Iry . I CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. RE: Don 87-11 February 17, 1988 Page 3 4. In conjun;tion with The Application; an1nftial Study/ Prew,minary Environmental Assessment, in conformity with the requiroments with the California Environmental quality Act, has Wen prepared; hoksver. Council has determined that :thi: project cou)d -have a significant advers, effect on the environment, and hereby decifnes•to make a finding of no significant impact and to certify a Negative•Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to section 65853 to 65857 of the Lalifornia Govenment Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies on the 17th day of February, 19U. Development District Amendment No. 87 -11. 30/ RESOLUTION NO. ??-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOM% CITY COUNCIL DENYING A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP OF THE GENERAL PLAN, GPA 88.01A, FROM OFFICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD CWRCIAL FOR 3.45 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTk4EST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT "HEREOF - APN: 208 - 202 -13, 14. A. Recitals. (i) Jamcs E. Carter his filed an application for the General Plan Amendment No. 88-01A as described to the title of this Resolution,. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment request is referred to as The Application. (11) On January 27, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on The 4pplication, and issued Resolution No. 88-24 recommsnding to this City Council that said application be denied. (11) Cn February 17, 1988, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council herby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A. of this Resolution ar,• true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearinyy on February 17, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together uitn public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The Application app;ies to a 3.45 acre parcel of land base ^.ally rectangular in configuration, ^cated on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue. Said property is currently desigr4ted as Office on the Land Use Map of the General Plan and is s0stantlally vocant land exc. -pt for an existing access easement that bisects the property in a north -south direction over which d two way driveway with central median is developed-, and 3oa, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: GPA 88-01A February 17, 1488 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is n designated Low Pesidential (2 -4 du /ac) on the Land Use Map of General Map and consists of a church site and surrounding Single Family Residential, the _ prcpert;; to the south of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8- 14 du /ac) on the Land Use Hap of the General Plan and consists of a multi- family cpartsent complex, the property to the East is designated Office on ete Lano Use Map of the General Plan and consists of a Service Station and Office buildings, and the property to the west is designated Civic /Community and Park on the Land Use Map of the General Plan and consists of the public library and Lions Park; and (c) The Application requests the Amendment of the Land Use Hap of the General Plan from Office to Heighborhocd Commercial for the 3.45 acre parcel; and (d) The Application would not be consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, could potentially result in significant adverse Impacts to persons and property in the immediate vicinity of the subject site, and vould not be in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: (1) Severe site constraints limit the development potential of this site. Specifically, this site must share access to peripheral streets with an adjacent apartment complex. This shared access requirement limits the site's potential to be buffered from the adjacent apartment complex. fie Application would permit land uses of greater Intensity than under irrent General Plan designation. Therefore, this Application has the potential to increase land use incompatibility of this site with the adjacent residential use, and this is contrary to the objectives of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. (ii) With the approval of this application, the project site would be subjected to land uses of greater intensity that would expose adjacent residents to greater amounts of noise, objectionable odors, light /gglare, truck traffic, litter and other nuisance factors. These conditicna have the potential to result in significant adverse impacts to the people and property in the i®ediate vicinity of the project site, and therefore, would not be In the best Interest of the health, safety, cnd welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes that the application would not be consistent with the objectives of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to organize land uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses and would not protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 303 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOUrrION no. RE: GPA 88-OIA February 17, 1488 Page 3 4, in ronjunctiin with The Applicat'on, an Initial Study /Preliminary Enviromaental Assesswnt, in conforatity with the regvireuents with the California Enviromenta'. Quality Act, has been prepared; however, Council, ties detemined that this project could have a significant adverse affect on the environment, and hereby declines to make a finding of no significant iWict and to certify a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65350 to 65362 of the California Goverreent Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies on the 17th day of February, 1988, General Plan Amendment No. 88 -0IA. 30q r — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: North 16, 1488 nLtl TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda Hackett, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Vacation of Emmett Nay - located between Summit Avenue and Tract 11549 RECONMEMDATIOM: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the vacation of Emmett Nay from Summit Avenue to the northerly boundary of Tract 11549 and described to Exhibit "A•. Background /Analysis Mr. and Mrs. Joe Whitehouse are requesting the vacation of Emmett Kay across the easterly side of their property which i5 located at the northwest corner of Shasta Drive and Emmett Way (APN 225 - 181 -63). Staff has expanded the limits of the vacation to include the lots to the north and south of the Whitehouse (APN 225 - 181 -64 and 225 - 181 -52) but excluding the Intersection at Shasta Drive (refer to Exhibit •B'). The suolect street right -of -way is 30 4eet wide and is uniuproved. It is not part of any circulation system and the present alignment Is not required for orderly development of the area. Phase I of Tract 11549, to the south, has already been constructed and Planning Commission has approved Tentative Tract 12462, to the wait, neither of which utilize Emmett Way. Mr. Rocco Albanese owns the property on the southwest corner of Emmett Nay and Shasta Drive, both have been notified and are to agreement with the subject vacation. Also, ail affected utilities have been notified and concur with the vacation. Cucamonga County Water District has abandoned Its lines to Emmett Way, so they do not need an easement. If vacated, the street will revert back to the adjacent properties. In conjunction with this vaeatien, the City will reserve to itself a storm dr.sn easement over the proposed area to be vacated. 30S CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT VACATION OF EMMETT MAY 14ARCH 16, 1988 PACE 2 The subject vacation was tentatively approved at the January 27. 1938. Planning Co=issian Meeting. City Council approved the intention, to vacate Emmett May and net the date of the public hearing for March 16, 1988, at its February 17. 1988, meeting. Respect ull submitted, RHM: :sd Attachments :zA4 a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF EMMETT HAY B.TIIEEN SUMMIT AVEQE AND THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT 11549 WHEREAS, by Refolution No. 88 -083, passed on Fetruary 17, 1988, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate a ` portion of a City street hereinafter more particularly described, and set the • hour of 7:30 p.m. oa March 16, 1988, in the Lions Park Community Center ,., Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time T and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and- WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation. follows: BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as '( SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted that ,k a portion o-7-GFe—tt Way is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its „rder vacating that 'f portion of said City street as shown on Map No.V -077 on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description ,.hich is attached hereto, marked Exhibit 'A', and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: The subject vacation shalt be subject to the reservations and exceptTo-n-s—.77 any, for existing utilities oa record SECTIOP 3: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorUed- nithe office of the County Recorder of Sar. Bernardino County, California SECTION 4: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption 0 this reso utiion and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. 3119 Y 4j i PARGEI Mflp Ado. 44('29 - KV G A .xIB^1YL5111 O° LD' 4.15LOCK E OF 111E MWFOF TKE EiIWA \DA CDLptlt LANDS j AS PEC PLAT RECOL.•c"� IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS PAGE 24. RECOROS OF !YIN DERWIDNO COUNTY 'a &R� 3 COB° L S 3162 IN THE (ITT OF RpryCHO CLICAMONGA �T 1971 RPACE"_ V. 1 - P336SI S'M0 j. / /tT PZCEL r:.. 1 H9'l.CL h: 2 I PA7LCFL 9iL•• '] I ur•.Q`c• r � � 1 trail . . r,R SUMMIT AVENUE F21'CiR.PCn. S9T'iOyE zo a•rz /nw'1 2711 fi• r2113M 70120ZTAt1RS�'-- I _ Lj _= ffr•rTI[1nrAr, osofc^TION-. -1 7 _ 241 LS 89'51'31• F 1 "" � •2000 � •90'09 N' 994 (x•2000 ) 1.2003 `- o ti PA2CEL N6. 1 PARCEL NO. Z p b �� N " TO ISE VACATED a Y w 1 V 90.OL'19' Q+87•JS'24' \ .,• • 1000 9�� � 7697 2.2000 2 1 C• ;z H 2604 3134 O w T• IL9T - 291 LS - I - T 71 - n 41 57A o n° FV30 or 7cl38 xTION -- s9rso v 5 To11a_ a+ D21VE o C ! �C .- - _ { — 291 TJ i 29 47 a ' 2. iL' 2006 00 1 D• 90.09']1' c at is R 2000 n P016 L• ]I 49 + T 21 11 PARCEL. NO 3 "° ., PA2CEC. NO g TO BE VACAT. " W •� 1 N ^ I N 6 b L r a tn �! 'Iw 311 77- `1 �, 31] 71 t/•! �+ :l 1. N 09•!4` �I3�) 'ca rSsS° •.. L1 • e.' ZV3 10 f Z7p 0Y 1 LOL IPi '• IR971 { /LS ut1•N101• 272701 'q bb) \ n Ii0300) FFF ! pi 617 ')Nt, _ HL N D 10290 f LT x — - - - - - -��'.'.= 1F PEk CFSb fi0f0 CC7 2J:) br - 1 $ ExhI eft "A" i ,. El DESCRIPTION OF THAT PORTION OF OFFER OF DEDICATION POP. EMMETT WAY ADJACENT TO PARCEL $0. 4 OF P.N. N0. 4029 TO BE VACATED. �f;�Q•ztCz;,: All of that portion of Offer of Dedication for Evett Way as shown on Parcel Hap No. 4029[ in the City of Rancho Cucaeorgs, as recorded in Parcel Map Book 38, Page 2, records of San Bernardino County, State of Califorila, described as follows; Coemncing at the intersection of the centerline of Shasta Drive with the Pest line of said Parcel Nap Be. 4029; Thence S 0.14'03" W along said East line, a dittaace of 30.00 fact to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing S 0.14003" W, along said East line for a distance of 295.86 feet to the South line of Parcel Nap No. 40291 Thence N 89.50'24" W a distance of 30.00 feet to the southeast corner of Parcel 4 of said Parcel Nap No. 4029; Thence N'1 °14'03" E along the Ecst line of said Parcel 4 a distance of 275.83 feat to the beginning of a tannent circular curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 20.00 fecL1 Thence northwesterly along said curve a distance of 31.44 feet, subtending a central angle of 90. 04'34 ", to a point on the South line of Shasta Drive (60.00 feat vide); Thence S 89 050'31" E along the projection easterly of sold South line of Shasta Drive, a diutanee of 50.03 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Whitehouse Description LHN 2 -2 -88 3'J9 LP Y , c DESCRIPTILr OP THAT PORTION OF OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR EMMBTT HAY AD3ACWT TO PARCEL NO. 2 OF PAPCEL MAP 140. 4029, P.M.D. 38/2 TO BE VACATED. All of chat portion of Offer of Dedication for Enoett Hay as show on Parcel Map No. 4029, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga as recorded in Parcel Map Book 38, Page 2, Ncords of San Bernardino County, State of California, described as.follovsl Co®encing at the intersection of tae centerline of Shasta Drive with the East line of said Parcel Map No. 40291 Thence No. 0' 14 03" E along *aid East line a distance of 30.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing N 0'14' 03" E, along raid Eastline a distance of 295.65 feet to an intersection with a line parallel with and distant 44.00 feet southerly (measured at right angles) to the centerline of Sumelt Avenues Thence N 89'50130" N along said parallel line a diatance of 30.03 foot to • point of cusp with a tangent circular curve concave anuthwestet ly and having • radius of 20.00 feet( Thence ooutheuterly along said curve a distance of 31.44 feet mubtanding { a central angle of 90 004141 "s Thence S 0 °14103" W along the east line of Parcel No. 2 of said Parcel Map No. 4029, a distance of 255.86 fast to the beginning of tangent circular curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 20.00 fectl Thence southwesterly along said curve a distance of 31.39 feet subtending $ a central angle of 89.55126 ", to a point on the North line of Shasta Drive (60 00 feet vide) Thence S 89'50'31 "E along the projection easterly of said North lira of Shasta Drive, a distance of 49.97 feet to the True Point of 9aginning ' a �� 3 io -n 311 n O Q A x a I r*° u A b� O` --C,z 31.I� • O f is Mfr f 'ii U 313 U 9 V i to u _a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT N.; r• DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: Mayor ane, Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris 'Acstman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: STREEY NAME CHANGE FOR TERRA VISTA PCRKW.4Y AND ELI /,VENUE ZEII Si__ pr0�osa to es gnate est ern, Pieta Pa�rtay an ast Terra Vista Parkway, and to designate West Elm Avenue for a special arterial and a toticctor street respectively within the Terra Vista Planned Conmunity. 1. RECOHMENDAIION! The Planning Commissions recommaras that the City uun2.'�iajprove the street name changes. tt. BACKGROUti - The reason for street name thanes Is to eliminate oud b e�nfersactions with the same street n>aes it two locations (see Exhioit 'A ") The locations are for T•.rra Vista Parkway and Church Street and Elm Street and Church Street. Part of the original request was to it an •East" and -Kest" designat on at the end of Terra Vista Parkway to establisn two separate streets bisected by Milliken. This format was preferred by thu Sler•iff's Department and the Fi-e District because they felt that the trailing designation would eaphasize "East' ind 'West' and make tht street easier to find on rn index list. Meitner agency, however, was absolute cn the designation. Ill. PLANNIN( COMMISSION: The Planr,ng Commission co,iducted a public hear n9 to rev ew the request on February 24, 19118. The recommeidation of the Plannirp Commission is to put the 'East" and 'West" at the beginning of Terra Vista Parkway because their feeling is that the direct'onal designation, will have a 9neater impact 1s a prefix (see at-.ached February 14 1988 minutes) The second oart of the stre,.t name chanra request is tt rename a portion of Elm Street wrst of Spruce to "West Elm Street." The Planning Commission supp,,rts the request as submitted. 3/y x CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET NAME CHANGE - LEWIS HOMES March 16, 1988 Page 2 IV. PROCEDURE: Upon receiving test, ou ncii shall announce its deci changes by Resolution. The Co approve, or deny the street name findings. If approved, the Resol which saic changes will become e final. Sixty (60) days prior to city C1Prk shall send written n Office, County Recorder, Fire Dis- iy at this public hearing, the n on the proposed street name 11 may approve, conditionally anges pursuant to the required on shall include the date upon :tive. This decision shall be effective date of change, the ce of the change to the Post ;t, and Sheriff's Department. V. 'INOINGS: Before approving a street name change, tae Council must ma a We following + ndings: A. That the proposed change is consistent with the goals, policies, and standards of the General Plan. B. That the proposed change is consistent with the adopted Master Plan of Streets and Highways or adopted Circulation Element. C. That the proposed change will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment D. That the proposed change is deemed necessary to protest the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing 'n t4l , �R Drrt_ newspaper and notices were posted along the affected streets and within affected apartment complexes. No correspondence has been received to date for or against the name changes . he was no public testimony give at the Planning Cywir,�ssionA is hearing pec Brad Oul erW� City P nner 81 w to Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of February 24, 1988 Including Exhibits and Resolution Planning Commission Minutes of February 24, 1988 City Council Resolution 3/S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �ucxuq STAFF REPORT ZA _2 DATE: February 24, 1988 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comisslon FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westmun, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: STREET NAME CHANGE FOR TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND ELM AVENUE proposal to designate Terra Vista ar way es an Terra Vista Parkway East and to designate Nest Elm Avenue to a major arterial and a collector street respectively within the Terra Vista Planned Community. ABSTRACT: At the request of Lewis Homes, street name changes have een n ated for Terra Vista Parkway and Elm Avenue (see attached letter). The street name changes are now before the Planning Commission for their review and consideration. The Planning Commission must conduct a public hearing and forward a recoaniendation to the City Council. II. BACKGROUND: As a special arterial, Terra Vista Parkway runs Planned Communitynfor eapproximatelyp2rmiles i(see Exhibitr "A"jistA second special arterial, Church Street runs the entire length of the planned co- iunity from Haven Avenue wes to Rochester Avenue. Terra Vista Pai.way intersects Church Street in two locations. Elm Street, a smaller collector loop road, also intersects Church Street in two locations. The intention is to lessen the confusion of the double intersections by renaming the streets with the designations of "east' and "west" III A14ALYSIS: By designating 'east" and 'west" sections of Terra Vista ar way, it will reduce the possibility of confusion due to the double intersections. Staff has contacted several agencies and the general response has been that they are In favor of the street name changes. A concern was brought up regarding the placefaent of the designations of 'west' and "east% It was felt that often with directional prefaces, they are not referenced. If the designations follow the already given street name versus preceding the given street name (e g. Terra Vista Parkway Nest), It will emphasize the designation. ITEM K 316 MUMME PLANNING COMIISSION STAFF REPORT STREET NAME CHANGE 88 -01 Februcry 24, 1988 Page ? Neither street will have single family residential addresses. However, at this tiara, there are three apartment complexes with Terra Vista Parkway addresses and a school with a Terra Vista Parkway street address. The greatest impact will be to those apartment dwellers. Potential impacts and issues are outlined below: Major Impacts: 1. There are a proximately 550 residences of the a artawnts which would be effected by the new change. Legal documents and forms of identification would have to include the 'west' designation. Minor Impacts• 1. Street naae signs would have to be amendod to reflect the changes. 2. Recorded maps would need amendment. 3. Utility companies, emergency services, and the postal service would have to revise their systems to accomodate the name change. IV. FINDINGS: The proposed change 1s in accordance with Section 5 of Ord ni once No. 144 and can be justified by the following findings: A. It is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan. B. It Is consistent with the adopted Circulation Element. C. It will not cause significant adverse effect on the environment D It is deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare. V CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper, es gnated areas were posted along Terra s a ar way and Church Avenue, and the apartment projects were posted at key areas NJ PLANNING COM(iSSICH STAFF REFORY STREET NAME CHANGE 88 -01 February 24, 1988 Pago 3 V1. REC(MMEMOATION: Staff recoeesends that the cQ!;3rcr­a­--PUbTic hearing and consider all Proposal. If tho Omission should concur Resolution is attached for your consideration. Resp ly su ted, ra 8 r City nor BB:CV:te Attecheents: Letter from Lewis floats Exhibit 'A' - Location Nap Resolution of Approval K-3 .313, Planning Loassission the aspects or this with the proposal, a ti J a. OWS (y\���t� Y. ki�.yl f 1 —Rc'CEIVHD- I ll le +m Uw Awww / /0.y670rijVnAC.Vx,. 917{3 1714 MM71 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIICA P.ANNINC OIy1S'C:1 A. Detsmber 0, 1987 CEO 0 1987 Mr. Chris Westman 7j8jti1WlbjUjlj'ISl`�l Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0 Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Christ In checking our Plans for Terra Vista, we have noticed that we have two double intersections) that is, two Church Street and Elm Avenue IntY:*Octions and two Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street intersections. We have discussed the matter with Foothill Fire District, the Sheriff s Department and Debra Maier on City Staff. It was felt the solution of naming the street sections "East" and "West" will not wore, in the Casa of Elm Street. Elm Street croseas Foothill Boulevard and proceeds nOrth Past Church Street wherr it starts A Curie to the northwest, then curve* again tO'the west. It was agreod by all oa ties that It would be very confusing to be 0rivin0 north on 'Elm Street East" otter crossing Foothill bpulwvard It was suggested that Elm Street to the west of S1 ^ute " Onu9 00 re -named West Elm Street, and retain the portion east of Sp uce A enue as Elm Street We -c"10 p ^JpOLe a different solution for the two Te.,A Vista parkway and Cnur,.n Street InterseOtlons WO would like to Pr000*o that Terra Vista Parkway west Of Milllken be ro -nameo re,-,a 'Isla Parkway West. and fhdt the portion east Of Mlillian b4 re -named Terra Vista Parkway East Fo Your convenience. I have enclosed a map slowing 0u•' JrOpr Jed ^Jiges Please let us kMw what lour Ideas Or solutlo, On •,e utter are. If there are a,, ngulations c proGOd us es tnAl we re94 to 00 aware of, or if there needs to b0 aoo.tio".: 01 a_ ^431J n, feel free t0 ..all lo^. Melcr.d, u me On t "It Matte. l J I r "'It'E5 )F _AtICOINJA ta ��C 'aa K aAl- �_ � ai. -s4�z * .•a 3!9 CITY OF RA.,NUio CL'CAmaNGA BANNING DIVEM 9 -5 NORTH ITEM. ''TAMAS d4UeE- Tnu- 41tYA (" 1 {4P EXHIBIT.— scALE, 3 .,0 RESOLUTION NO. ?' R ItMOMENDING APPROVAL OFHOSTREET WAhE�CHANGE No. 188-01 REIlUESTING A MANE CHANGE TO DESIGNATE TERRA VISTA PARKWAY NEST AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY .AST, AND TO DESIGNATE WEST ELM AVENUE FOR A SPECIAL ARTERIAL AND A COLLECTOR STREET D RESPECTIVELY WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PLMNED CO0ItI1111TY W'AEREAS, on the 24th day of February, 1980, the Planning Commission halo a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and IIHEXEAS, on the 20th day of Nay, 1981, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 144 establishing Streot Naming Policy for Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the Planning Division has prepared a r, •Lt discussing the ` justiflcetton for tha change, recommending a replacement name an discussing the impact of the proposed change, flrtdingJ: NON, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission has made tho following 1. The proposed change would not create significant adverse impacts on the environment. 2. The proposed cnange 1s consiste,.c with the goals, policies, and standards of Lne General Plan. 3. The proposed change 1s consistent with the adopted clrculation element. 4. The street name change is deexd necessary in order •e protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and genoral welfare. HON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850.65855 of the California Government Code, the Planning Cosmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 24th day of February, 1988, of Street Name Lhange No. 88.01; 2 That the Planning Commission here Sy recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Street Name Change No. 88.01; and 3. That a certified copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopt-, by the Planning Conmisslon shall be forwarded to the City until. K-0 3 ,71 PLANNING GIMMISSION RESOLMPION No. STREET NAME CHANGE 38-01 February 24, 1988 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANNGA BY: arry 1. MCMIel, LneIrman ATTEST: ra u ar, epu y Ure airy I. Brad butler, Deputy Secretary, of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify thst the foregoing Resolutten was duty and regOarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plnnning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular oesting of the Plmnnin2 Co mutton held 1' on the 24th day of February, 1988, by the following Yote-t0.vit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: AYES: CiNMISSIONERS: CHITIE4, TOLSTOT, ENERICK, MCHIEL KOES: COMMISS104ERS: NONE AB_£NT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLET Commissioner folstoy moved to adopt the Resolution for Item J and forward the Ordinance to City Council for adoption. Commissioner Chitiea seconded tha cotton. The Potion was carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, WRICK NOES: COMMUSIONEP.S: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS BLAKESLEY Chairman McNeal stated that he had heard that someone had received a response frcm William Lyon and they support this as well. K. -- carried - A Parkway East and to designate West Elm Avenue for a major arterial cnd a collector street respectively within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNeel opened the public baring. Hearing none, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he supports the name change because of the importance of being able to identify exactly wher4 you are, but is wondering if that is enough of a change in "Terra Vista Parkway West" and "Terra Vista Parkway East'. He was concerned that in an emergency 'East" and "Nest" might be lost. Chairman McNeal stated that the Commission would not be salting a precedent with respect to West and East, every community has a north, south, east and west streets Commissioner Tolstoy stated that they do not usually intersect the same street twice. He stated that it might be batter to tail it "West Terra Vista Parkway ", rather than "Terra Vista Parkway West". Com issioner Chitiea stated that she felt that would mike more sense. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, stated that is the system used in Victoria on their loop streets. Planning Commission Minu:a: -1'L- February 24, 1988 3-73 Commissioner Chitiea suggested the saw for East Elm because someone could drop the West from Elu. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, stated the reason that was not done on that stretch was because it does generally run in a east -west direction, but when it hits Church Street, it is basically running south. If the Commission was going to change it, maybe the name should be changed completely. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he would nst like to see the Commission alter the theme of Terra Vista Parkway. He did not think West and Fast Terra Vista Parkway would violate that. He stated in the case of Elm Street, there should be two different names. Chairman McNiel re- opened the public hearing. Candace Frank, Lewis Homes, stated that it made sense to them that Elm Avenue at Foothill remain Elm Avenue, because if you make it East Elm, you will be driving north on Elm, cross Foothill, and you will be on East Elm. She felt that would be too confusing for people. She stated that they discussed it with City staff and that was the suggestion they came up with. Chairman McWiel questioned if Elm runs below Foothill as well. Candace Frank stated that yes it does. That was why they did not want to chsnge iL to West Eim and Last Elm. They felt it was important to have the continuity at Foothill. They felt that designating the street as West Elm Avenue, tho west would not get lost. As far as Terra Vista Parkway, it was suggested Terra Vista Parkway East and Wert. Terra Vista Parkway West is currently constructed, Terra Vista Parkway East is not. She stated there will be no addresses on either street except there are currently addresses on Terra Vista Parkway West that are apartments. She would assume that from the start, everyone livii,g east of Milliken, if they lived on Terra Vista Parkway East, would know that is that name with no confusion. She helieved the preferred eexignation was Terra Vista Parkway East and West, but they would be willing to work with that. She stated that she felt it was very important that Elm .,treat remain that at Foothill. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissicner Chitiea stated she still agrees with Commissioner Tolstoy that West needs to precede it. She stated that as far as keeping Elm at Foothill, that is reasonable. Chairman MCNiel stated that the proposal he would support would be prefix Terra Vista Parkway with East and West and to leave Elm Street and West Elm Street. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed. Planning Commission Minutes -13- February 24, IgPB 3.:�Y I l Commissioner Chitlea moved to approve the resolution as modified. Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. The aotion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, MCNIEL, EMERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY :•r••i --carried NEW KMIKSS M. ENVIROIMIENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEYFI_nmWhrr mrvrru m7_c -. _ v W""ImsI - Ina 0ave10 nt of -71 ST n us r a s ribution buildings totaling 423,827 square feet on 22 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13) located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue - APN: 229 - 263 -10 through 13. Na:,cy Fong, Associate Planner, presented staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Lee Redmond, with O'Donnell, Armstrong, Brfghaa, representing the applicant, stated they concur with the staff report. Chairman Mc Niel closed tha public hearing. Commissioner Chitlea moved to approve the resolution. Commissioner Tolttoy seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY ' * " ' -- carried S APPEAL OF TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88 -03 PRATHER - M appeal of s s ec s an ro deny the re00_v_&7_07_UFr_e_e_M Eucalyptus trees at tho rear of a single family home within the Very Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) located at 9200 Golden - APN: 1062 - 221 -09. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Planning Commission Minutes -14- February 24, 1988 RESOLUTION 90. 88' -1 S$ — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE NAME OF TERRA 'STA PARK'J.IY TO EAST TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND VrST TLAU1 VISTA PARKWAY AND ESTABLISHING MILLIKEN A,'ENUE AS THE DIVIDING INTERSECTION, AND CHANGING ELh AVENUE TO NEST ELM AVENUE FOR THAT SECTION NEST OF SPkt�.E AVENUE WHEREAS, street names hive baen assigned which will create double intersections with the same naves. WHEREAS, emergency service personnel need to be able to determine street locations without hesitation. WHEREAS, the proposed changes will not create significant adverse impacts on the environment. WHEREAS, the proposed changes are consistent with the goals and policies and standards of the General Plan. WHEREAS, the proposed changes are oeemea necessary in order to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby designate Terra Vista Parkway, which runs approximately 2 miles from Churc'i Street to Church Street, to be henceforth known as West Terra Vista Parkway west of Milliken Avenue, and East Terra Vista Parkway east of Mill. +in Avenue and does also hereby designate Elm Avenue west of Spruce Avenue as West Elm Avenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the Board of Supervisors, County of San Bernardino, as set forth In Section 34092 of th0 Government Code, of the State of California. 3.* ��r. a r. .j n ' ♦ � ! F�u - <91 :5 1 w it � • �� !'' w �; ` �� / = 0 � Ci CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: M1ki Bratt, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: COMMUNITY 0£YELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FISCAL YEAR 1988--I989 —'ti a a7op� 1-3—n-37 e e mi ary a cared amn y jectives for the fiscal year 1988 -89 and preliminary seL�ction of projects based on an anticipated grant of $417,010 I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff racemsends that the City Council adopt the e ac a eso u ton resulting in the following actions: o Adopt the prelimiiary statement of co®unity objectives, o Assts flood plain impacts and consider alternatives to pr000.ed projectr located in the base flood plain, o Affira the adoltel relocation polity, ane o Make a prelfminar, selection o' projects for funding. lI. ABSTRACT: In accorance with HUD requirements, staff has prepared U—e Fe iminary Statemer• of Comuunity Objectives for Ffscal Yeer 1988 -89 Community Develoi '^nt Block Grant (CDBG) program. The City has received proposals fo. eight programs /projects for a total cost of $575,300.00. Based on an anticipated block grant of $417,000.00 approximately $333,600.00 will be available for project funding and $83.400.00 reserved for program managmenet, future projects and efforts to further fair lousing. Staff recommends projects which will exceed the amount of the 1988 -89 grant and proposes to reprogram unexpended prior year's Block Grant funds to make up the difference. Reprogramming actions will be submitted along with the Final Statement of Community Objectives and selection of projects at the April 20, 1988 meeting of the City Council. At tonight's meeting, the City Council is asked to make a preliminary selection of those projects which most clasely correspodu o community needs. 3-�8' CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CD3G GRANT APP FOR '- 988•b9 March 16, 1988 Page 2 The preliminary eState■e t of CowunitydObjectiveisiare sumarll_dtin the Background section and e:alueted in the Analysis section. In addition, the City's policies on relocation assistance for those affected by Block Grant funded activities, ae on flood are protection for rehabilitation of homes in the flood D included, as required by HUD. III BPLt -RO gram The nce 11982 of asRancentitle■entacity. participated Each Ya then City . has prepared men tPtocasecure ofundingS.forpspecificf Housing and Urban Development programs which further specified federal and local goals and objectives. Until fiscal year 1987 -88, the focus of public improvements was the North Town selected and residents funded in upgrade over to wDD projectsehave been completednor9are nearing completlion. the ■ or Beginning in 1987 -88, the City Council shifted the focus s,f the public improvements to the Southwest Cucamonga neighborhood. City departments have cooperated in the identification of a public improvement program for the area similar ti) that followed in North Torn CDBG funds are allocated to local jurisdictions based on a formula and which Instance ofdaercrhowdingtinDthe City. instance calfyearVe988 -89, Rancho Cucamonga has been allocated an estimated $417,000. adainis stOlY ,S8lnc lading thesrequiredefairSeheus info rservicess,, leaving $353,600 for projects. Federal select-^rforlfunding pmust meetthat certainteligibilityactivities c are criteria are sumarized below: o predominantly o f persons1eofoulo-a- a d imoderaote- incomestand provide services for such persons. In Rancho Cucamonga, only the reet in Alta Loma qualify undercthisOpeOvisgion. .moods and one o The activity must involve ftcilities designed for use predominantly by persons of low- and moderate - income. 3a9 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: COW GRANT APP FOR 1986.89 Narch 16, 1988 Page 3 o The activity must involve employment of persons, a majority of whom are persons of tar- and moderate - income. o Conditions of slum and blight must be reduced or elim•.nated. Based on these guidelines, the Planning Division solicited proposals for projects to be funded under the CDBG program. F1gh: projects were submitted by City staff and community agencies. Each project is described below. In the Analysis section, staff has evaluated thesa projects on the basis of federal regulatic•.s and the Preliminary Statement of Coammunity Objectives. The projects are: 1. Housing Rehabilitaticn: Continuation of a housing r robilitatTon program`That offers below market interest rate loans and deferred loans, to lower Income person or families,_ and home improvement grants for minor repairs to senior citizens and disabled or handicapped persons. Activities funded include outreach /public information, home improvement loans and ewrgency repair grants (senior citizens and disabled only). During the 1981 -8R fiscal year, 25 seniors have used the emergency repair grants, one household has received a home Improvement loan and approximately 16 applications are pending. Requested Funding. No new funding request. 2. Senior Shared Housing: This is an ongoing program providing a maching service forthose who wish to share their home with senior citizens in need of housing. The project is eligible under block grant regulations since it serves primarily lower Incomo residents. The level of participation, so far, has been itmited. Twenty -seven people have been counseled (15 providers and 12 seekers of housing) leading to match -up of two persons. The counseling service is beneficial for seniors in helping them to explore the options for ,dependent liv,ng. Requested Funding: $6,300.00 3 Southwest Cucamonga s Street Improvements for Avenida War: pro ec involves— reconstrucgon of e streets. MET-UTI-59 construction of concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; and upgrading of water and sewer lines as needed to meet health and 'dfem.,v • andards. Both design and construction are proposed f­ 19• X89 (see Exhihit No. 1). Requesting Funding- $167,000.00 3.30 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CDBG GRANT APP FOR 198849 March 16, 193P Page 4 4. Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvements for Sierra Madre Avenue and Placida our s pro ec nvo ves pavewen r a on; cons ruction of concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; u ^1 upgrading of water and sewer lines where necessary on erra Madre Avenue north of Arrow Route and on Placid& Court. Design and construction phases are proposed for funding in 1988 -89 (see Exhibit No. 1). Requested Funding: $202,000.00 i. Emergency Social Services `or the Homeless: In response to the request or pr000sars 1'r,: p�oTecEs Tam• the funding year, Concerned Citizens for Community Improvement has requested funding to provide a comprehensive emergency service program, including food, clothing, shelter, counseling and referrals for the Nest valley area. Funds are requested to match funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) administered by United Nay. Requested Funding: $8,000.00 S. Senior Dental Health Service: In response to the newspaper e ertisement announc ng a availability of funds, the County of San Bernardino Department of Public Health has requested funds to operate a program to educate senior citizens on the tmportanco of dental health and teach them to care for the!r teeth and dentures, as well as to provide individual counseling and referrals. Requested Funding: $5,600.00 7 Neighborhood Center Expansion: The VIP Club requests enclosure o an existing ng pa o at—We Neighborhood Center to provide additional space for operation of programs for senior citizens year round. Requested Funding: $85,000.00 8. Fair Housing: Inland Mediation Board proposes to continue to prov e a r Housing Services to further fair housing All Block Grant recipients are required to provide fair huusing services Reluested Funding: $8,657.00 9. San Bernardino Count Community Hcustn Resorrce Doard Inc.: e n ernar no our y aomun y ouI ng esource Dare, Inc. has submitted a proposal for fair housing information services. The program would include public education workshops 331 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: COBG GRANT APP FOR 1983-89 March 16, 1988 Page 5 and seminars with clients who are statistically noted as persons likely to be discriminated against, as well as advertising and marketing efforts. Requested Funding: $18,000.00 IV. RELOCATION ASSISTANCE POLICY: In addition to the preliminary fe ec ono pro ec s, a era regulations require affirmation 0 federai relocations assistance policy. None of the proposed projects will invulve acquisition of right -of -way or the displacement of residents or businesses. However, in the event that displacement should occur, provisions fur relocatd')n assistance will be made in conformance with the City's adopted relocation policy and the requirements of state and federal law. V. FLOOD HAZARD PROTECTION: Federal regulations also require adoption 0 0o zone Po c es. Although most of the water courses in the City have been channelized to reduce flood hazards, there are some areas which are Potentially subject to flooding in a 100 -year flood (see Exhibit No. 2). There are residential structures within the floodplain which would be eligible for partfctpition in the rehabilitation program if the owners meet the income requirements. Also, some of the streets in Southwest Cucamonga are in the 100. and 500 -year flood plain. COW regulations require the City to develop policies addressirg this problem. Housing Rehabilitatio,,. rn accordance with Executive Order 11988, TT o0 p a n management, std Tf considered alternatives to renabilitation of housing in the flood hazard areas and found them impractical or undesirable. One alternative would be to exclude residential units in these areas from the rehabilitation program and encourage the conversion of these areas to other uses. This would not guarantee that the use would change and also low- income resfd•:nts of the properties would not have the option of financing necessary repairs of their units. As a result, they would be more iikely to live in substandard conditions. Relocation of residents and removal of the units from the flood hazard area is not a reasonable alternative. In addition, the Identified flood hazard areas encompass a mix of residential, public, commercial and industrial -ises. Removal of the residential use would neither remove the danger of flood damage and injury nor return the flood area to its natures state. Therefore, the City has determined that rehabilitation of the units in the flood hazard area is the most practical and desirable alternative. In order to mitigate flood hazard impacts for any units which are rehabilitated under the program, the County of San Bernardino requires that owners of properties located in flood hazard areas 33�. CITY COEMCIL STAFF REPORT RE: COBG GRANT APP FOR 1988 -89 March 16, 1988 Page 6 show evidence of federal flood Insurance coverage before their loans are funded. This requirement aodlles to all loans in Rehcho Cucamonga. Southwest Cucamonga Streets: Staff also considered alternatives to provfd ngg p c mprovement- in areas of Southwest Cucamonga located in identified flood ha..ard areas. One alternative would be to exclude flood hazard areas fr m the pubt'c improvements, and encourage these areas to transition to othbr uses. Since the entire area is developed with single - family homes and has been for over 20 years, It is not likely that the area will transition to uses more compatible with the flood plain. Another alternative would be to include storm drbfns in the street improvements. Since the primary flood flow 1s north to south along Grove Avenue and outside the target area, it is not eligible for Block Grant funding. Local storm drains could improve drainage of the target area, but in general, the cost of storm drains is too high to be funded through Block Grants. Also, the installation of local laterals, in the absence of a main drain, could increase flooding downstream. VI. ANALYSIS: In considering project funding for fiscal year 1988 -89, s—ieff —Was reviewed etch of the proposals on the basis of eligibility under block grant criteria, status as an ongoing or obllyated program /project and project priority in terms of need within the City. 1 Housing Rehabilitation: This high priority program should be continue using unexpended funds from prior years. Expenditure levels lagged in the first years of the program, but have averaged 580.000 a year in recent years. Reprogramming of $80,000 from prior year funding is recommended. 2. Senior Shared Housing: Participation in this program is i ream ny rouy�utreach efforts by the applicant. Continued funding at the cur -ent year level of $6,300 is recommended. 3. '^uthwest Cucamonga Street Improvements for Avenida Yejar: TRTs ena uze eon twang Item are con nua on o e progra- or fmprovemcnt in the Sdb ^F+est Cucamonga target area adopted by the City Council in 198,. Funding for design and construction of Avenida Yejar 1s recemruended in the amount of $167,000, 4 Southwest Cruypm_anga Street Improvements for Sierra Madre and Pidtt da Cour undTng for de51g0 and cons rut o'1 n ai—S eT era a re an aclda Court is recommended in the amount of $202,000. -333 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CDBG GRANT APP FOR 1988-89 March 16, 1988 Page 7 5. Eae enc Social Services for the Homeless: Because of events such as mss r ncome, fam y apu es and changes in family status, persons and famllies in Rancho Cucamonga need emergency social services. Concerned Citizens for Community Improvement provides emergency services in the Nest End of San Bernardino County and has received Federal Emergency Management Act grants for homeless programs in the Nest End since 1985. They have applied for Bloc[ Grant Funding in previous years. The applicants and principle directors of the organization, William and Sandra Swain, live in Rancho Cucwnga. Concerned Citizens also operates homeless food and shelter programs in the City of Los Angeles. For part of the past year local services for the homeless were Baptist aptistChurch. 9875 Citizens ArchibaldAvenue, Rancho Cucamonga First currently the organization does not have a location within the City. Although State law and federal Block Grant regulations encourage local support for homeless programs, staff ours not recommend funding until a new local office is obtained. 6. Senior Dental Health Service: An informal pole of seniors at e e g or oo en e. —ibund that seniors expressed an interest in an on -site dental hygiene program, but did not favor a dental education pro -am. Staff recommends that the applicant meet with Seniors t the Neighborhood Center and develop a proposal for th• a9 -9C funding year which is supported by the seniors. 7. Ne! hborhoad Center Ex ,nsian: The VIP Club presented a petition con n ni g ly3— names of seniors active at the Neighborhood Center with this request. Although the Community Services Department supports the concept, not enough information is available to recommend the project ac this time. Staff will investigate and if the project is feasible, submit a proposal for funding in 1989 -90. 8. Fair Housing Services: Inland Mediation Board. INS has provided Fair Housing Services or unc program 1982. rpro ides fair housing services, includngmedist on of no`od tenant disputes and discrimination counseling, as well as information and education to further fair housing. Fair Housing education efforts include cooamunity workshops and curses for realtors and iandlnrds as well as appearances on local radio and television stations, especially spanish 3 3y 'CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CDBG GRANT APP FOR 1988 -89 March 16, 1958 Page 8 language programs. During 1987, IKB assisted with t e relocation of residents of the labor camp on Arrow Highwal Staff recommends continuation of funding in the amount o• $8,657.00. `. San Bernardino Lounty Comm"I Housin Resource Board, Inc. i s prop's, s mff-d-U--e- a,. ona ser. cps fu ur r fair housing and would supplement i! i existing fair housing t. program. For the most part, the educational services would j duplicate the educational services being provided by Inland Mediation Board. The cost would be more than twice as high as the full service faun housing program offered by Inland Mediation and therefore, this proposal is not recommended for funding. In •unwary, staff recommends the following projects and programs for_ funding out of the City's 1988 -89 .:ommunity Oevolopmert Block Grant award which is anticipated to be $417,003.00, as well as from unexpended prior year Block Grant funding: r' ' a. Senior Shared Housing $ 6,300.00 b. Southwest Cucamonga Street 369,000.00 Improvements c Program Administration 7x,743 00 LH:MB :ko 8,657 00 Total 2458,700.00 Attachments: Exhibit He. 1 - Southwest Cucamonga Streets Exhibit He. 2 - Flood Plain Map Exhibit No. 3 - Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives Resolution US, Names AREA OUALrYWO FOR COso FUMOs NEEDED sl11EET IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT AUTHOEIUD W Is&? -:PEE IM►ROVEMtMT RsCOMMENDEO FOR loss -loss CITY OF RAINCHO CUGAMCNK;A RANKING DIVEM. 80UTHWEST CUCAMOHOA IT6*vU TrrU, STREET I APROVEMEHr EXHIBIT, 1 SCA E NONE .33(o V \10RTH ' L 100 run FLOOD SOUNDAY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQ,\GA K AMM, DiVI5M V� NORTH MEM, _ TnIE, ^-06D CHANNEL EXHIBIT 2 SCALE NONE 24 7 RESOLUTION N0. Tr— '' 't A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 'UCAMONG.4, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY STATEMENT COMKINITY OBJECTIVES FOR THE FISCAL YF% 1988 -1989 AND Pk. INARY SELECTION OF PR(1,1ECTS RASED ON AN ANTICIPATED CAA. OF $417,000 WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1s au Entitlement City unler the regulations governing the Community Development Block Grant Program; and NHEREAS, notice of avnilebllity of f.indr for eligible projects vas isubiished in The Daily oeport, posted in the target area, as veil as public placer City -ride and msiled to interested groups; and WHEREAS, the City staff has received proposals for projects end programs from various organizations in the enamunity; end WHEREAS, the City Council has held a legally noticed oublic hearing in order to give the public an opportunity to rgspcad to staff recooxendatlons for program funding and to p.;t 'nrth for Council consideration re:ommendations of their own; and WHEREAS, the City Council has heard public testimony and received e!1 public input regarding the City's Community Development Blocx Grant Program for the next program year. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby take the following actions: 1. Determine that operation of the Housing Rehabilitation program in the flood plain is the most practical and desirable of the alternatives, and the proposed mitigation measures are sufficient. 2. Determine that improvements for street in Southwest Cucamongd which are In the flood plain, are the most practical rnd desirable of the alternatives, and that proposed mitigation measures are sufficient. 3. If relocation of households or businesses Is necessary as the result of the Comau.ity Development Block Grant Program, the adopted relocation policy in compliance with state and federal regulations will be followed. 4. Preliminary• selection of tha following projects and programs to be funded out of the City's 1988 -39 Cocsunity ;erelopment clock Grant award which is anticipated to be $417,000. The balance will be reprogrammed from unexpended prior year funds. a Senior Shored lousing t 6,300.00 b. SW Cucamonga St :;)rovements 369,000.00 c. Program Administration 74,743.CO Fair Housing 8,657.00 — / i _ YS5S7UO-080 2.5 le — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Enginetr BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH 4kiXATIO4 :i0. 11 FnR DR 87 -24, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BUFFALO AVENUE AND GTH STREET, TO STREET LIGHTING MAIXTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RECOMMENDATION: It is recomen -4d that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work ir. connection with Annexation No. 11 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. PACKGROUND /AH.J.YSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolr'.fon ordering the work in -onnection with Annexation Lo. 11 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No 6 for OR 87 -24, located on the northwest corner of Buffalo Avenue and 6th Street. The developer of the subject project has been notified of the public hearing by sail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 80 -C90. Respectfull ibmitted, c . e Attachments 339 RESOLUTION NO. 4BZ—Uo0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDEh?NG THE 1'OIK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION No. 11 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S RE20RT FOR OR 87 -24 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucawnga did on the 17th day of February, 1988, adopt its Rasolution of Intention No. 88 -091 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 11 to SZ-eet Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, Mich Resolution ^f Intention No. 88 -091 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; an0 WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution. of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, mud number as required by law, as 89 pears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of te City Clerk; and WHEREAS, afte- the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property Mention to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of intention No. 88 -091, accrrding to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Nctlfng on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated -ork and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired lurisdictior, to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga lhat the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 68 -091, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer Is hereby finally apprcvcd, an SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer'sifep—o-Frare hereby approves SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said traave been occupied. $410 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 11 for OR 87 -24 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report i• in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenanc9 District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effe.t upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is an file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is herety made a part of thi• report to the smte extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district iulude: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for tre illumination of the subject area. 51// SECTION 4. Estimated Costs N: costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement con•.truction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on _rvallable data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments wili be based on attuai cost data. + Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is comprised of street light improvements on local streets for all industrial, commercial and Institutional projects th-nughout the City. It has been determined that ore acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in residential zones. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. C is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Mai ntenanc"d1EnenXL2Lt.L l No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lemp Lamp Size+ YTD No. 11 Totel 58DOL 44 0 44 9500L 2 0 2 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Tutal Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate He's Maint. Cost 5800L 44 % f 8.93 Y 12 $4,715.04 9SOOL 2 % $10.16 % 12 • 243.84 Total Annual Maint. Cost J $4,958.88 2 Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation 355 Assessment Units this annex 'ier page 4 • _ 38 Total Assessment Units 393 3 y.L ■ 3. Cost Per Assessment Unit: Total Annual M.ainterance Cost No. of n s in District $4.958.88 , 512.62 /year /unit 3g3'— y Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained In Sectioa 6. SECTION S. .assessment Diagra, Coples of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this resort and labeled •Streat Ltgbtfng Maintenance District No. 60, Annexatlon No. 11. These dtagr,mts ire hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to oe of general benefit to ail units within the District and that assessment shall be equal foi each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per_ not acre. Y, SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adepts Resolutior. of Intentiot to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to forts a DL.trict or aoandon the procee.iings. 4. Ever- year In May, the City Engineer files a report wlth the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approvos, or msdifies and appro%:s the individual assessments. .3143 Y I 'A' EXHIBIT •A• Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 11 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: Assess. No. of L 16 s o be Annexed Project Acreage -Dni—t MMUE— MML+,WUL T3D11L DR 81 -24 18.83 38 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- ayy r W t of ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (o ANNEXATION NO. II SITE w.� 1 ..Jim o uAK 34 O q 0✓ is tir 41 � i t '•r r P rrK � 41 ' lY ' i t .�rtll+K . �� I 'Ttt wK '•t STREET •..1K + � Itlr �. � Mr w ti � .�i ` ii PW4 ✓ \� \ WK IaKK 1tlK� (tK 40 ,I •'' ; ; •vK�. 6th STR E '•t tl ,�� U� m� Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DMZ-24 s/ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALLW'ORNIA ■ D i, DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 16, 1988 City Council an9 City Manager Russell H. Naguiro, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WI1H ANNEKATIOU N0. 8 FOR OR 87-43, LOCATED NORTMWE -' OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AID NORTH OF VICTORIA WINDROWS LOOP TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RECON D MTION: It is recomended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work Ir connection with Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution orderinS the work in connection with Annexation No. 8 to Street 1.10tin Maintenance District No. 3 for OR 87 -43, located northwest of Victoria Park Lane aid north of Victoria Windrows Loop. The developer of the subject' project has been notified of the public hearing by -Ail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Res. •ition No. 88 -088. Respec y t,bmitted, RNM•JA:sjm Attachments I's .3 y(I I RESOLUTION N0. g$ - I1oI A RESOLUTION 07 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 87-43 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on ilia 17th day of February, 1989, adopt Its Resolution of Intention No. 88-089 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3, which wesdlution of Intention Ka. 88 -089 was duly and legally published in the time, fora and manner as rquired by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution Oe Intentior on file to the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, r.vtice of the pars0ff of said Resolution of Intention, neaded 'Notice of Img:ovement', was tiny "d legally posted in the tire, form, canner, location, and number as require., by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on f`la in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices o, the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly railed to all persons owning real property Mto be assessed for the iaprovements described to said ResO:utlon of Intention He. 88 -089, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as kn:,wo to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies war; duly milled to the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears fr,,m the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk.; and WHEREAS, said City Courol having duly received considered evidence, oral and docuzentary, concerni.ig the jurisdiction fa=ts in this proceeding and derive di therefrom anditiidnCity work and the binefits order the proposed wort. SECTION -• It 1s hereby resolved by the City Council of the C1t of Rancho Cucamon,a"fiat the public interest and convenience requires the y annexation t, the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described 1n said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -089, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby flnt:'.,v approved; an SECTION 3: The assessments and method of ossessment in the Engineer's poi are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said Liao s eve been occupied. 3Y7 CITY OF RANCHO LOCA14ONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nn. 3 Annexation No. 8 for OR 87 -43 SECTION 1. AuthorttyN fort This report is In c nplianca with the requirements of Art1cln 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. Uneral Description i Street Ligh ingCouncil MaintenancelDistrit No. 3.alThe CityvCounncilthasnto determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as tali as en the lots directly abutting the street lights. Murk to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual eaintenence, operating and servicing of street light Improvements on major streets (artorlal and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Albs Nsp which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all are in the District and cost shall be asserted on a per unit basis. SECTION 3 Plans and Soe_ c`o�s b The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared Conditions Y the developers. The plans and street lights are roved stipulated In the EngineeringoDivisional Referenceeislherreeby madeatoatheosubjectitract� map or devolopmant plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting Improvement e iad�hiiceeart of thisreprtto the sameextentasifsaid Plans and specfswer attached hereto Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, provldtrg for the illumtnttion of the subject area. 3Y8 4 mm, SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement canstructica. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indfuced below. Thase costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 Is comprised of street light improvements sn local condominiums anddap�ratstnttssitthrouyghoutitheeVictoria Planned Community. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit fcr the operation of the District. Zone 2 Is comprised of all tnCustrial, commercial and Institutional projects throughout the Victoria Planned Community. It has betn determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and insttt'+tioP..al areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in 4One 1. The estimated tot41 cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 is shown below: I. S.C.E. Maintenance and Enerav Cost: No. of Lamps Lamp Size* Lamps Annex Maw Lamp YTD_ no. 6 Total SDOOL 1058 0 1058 9500L 82 82 'High Pressure Sodium vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate No's Naint. Cost 5800L 1058 X f 8.93 X 12 $113,375 28 9500L 82 X $10.16 r. 12 9.997.44 Total Annual Maint. Cost $123,372.72 2 Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 3182 Asses :ent Units this annex per page 4 v 4 Total Assessment Units 3186 a 5/9 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annuil Maintenance Cost o n n s rrTcE-- $123 37722.72 • $38.72 /year /unit Assessaent shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Sect'on 6. SECTIONS. Assessm"tt Diaar Copies of the proposes Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled 'Street lighting Maintenance District No. 3', AnnexsVon Me. 8. These diagram are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment nivit ee isrr found general benefit to all units within t District and thatassesment shall be equal for each unit. Nhen units are based on acreags, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution rf Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's RE-port. 2. City Council adopts Resolution Of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the C1;, Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 345'0 EMBIT 'A' r Propertles and 1mprov.Mnts to be frcludsd within Annexsticn,Wo. 8 to Street Ligl:tfng Wntenanco District 3: a� Assess. Ib, of La stn M Annexed —Project Aeneas Zone 1 Y 4 Zcne 2 DR 87 -43 2.17 4 0 0 0 0 0 F° Y� f. m: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION NO. 8 Fa -i ii tae .tom Al Y CITY 041 MKCHO CYJc"0140A COUNTY omp BAaq Bmwm.DINO i STATE OF CAUD*RM _� II11 A PROJE C7 i a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '°3, t-f" STAFF REPORT Rt _ - DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aids SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 33 FOR DR 87 -24 AND OR 87 -43 (IiR1USTRIAL/COMK RCIAL) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RECD ODKTTON: It Is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 38 to Street Lighting Maintendrea District No. 1 and approving the Engin2er's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Councll approval is a resolution ordering the work to connectior with Annexation No. 38 to Street Lighting Maintenance Cistrict Ku. 1 for OP 87 -24 end DR 07 -43 (Industrial /Comeerclal). The developer of the subject protect has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88.086. 4e�pectful ubmiGed, HM. Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ' '3- 11.3. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIGA ORDERING THE HORK IN CONNECTION MIT, ANNEXATION NO. 38 TO STREEI LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGIhEER'S REPORT FOR DR 87 -24 AND DR 87 -43 MIEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 17th day of February, 1938, adopt its Resolution of Intention no. 88 -087 to order the therein described ,ork in connection with Annexation No. 38 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -081 was duly and legatl;' published in the time, form and manner ss required by law, shown by the Aff1,,Z,;L of Publication of said Risoiutlon of Intention on file fr the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the Limn., farm, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoptinn of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described In said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -087, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appear; on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copias were duly mailed to the t1rhe, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Nailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and KHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, ore. and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts In this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereoy resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga That the public Interest and convenience requires the arnexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Irtention Yo. 88 -087, be done and made; and SELTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; an SECTION 3; The assessments and method of assessment in the Engi,eer's epor are here %y approved. SECTIOCI 4: The assessments shall not bagtn until after 60 percent of said trigs Fiave bean occupied. ASS ;ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I Annexation No. 38 for DR 87 -24 and DR 87 -43 SECTION 1. Auth,rity for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landseeping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street ',lghts. Work to be provided fer with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services end materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which Is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3 Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or develo,aient plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting lmpro.effent on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Octa leu maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement oe all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. 3 5% SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated :hat maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is axprised of street light improvements on ma.13r streets for residential improvements (single family, multi- family, condominiums acid apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of 1 the District. f' Zone 2 is comprised of all Industrial, commercial and institutional pro3ects throughout the City. it has been determt-2d that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 is shown below: S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: •HfSh pres!ure Sodium Vapor Tot•i No. of Lamps Lamp Size LavL Larps Annex flew Lamp Lamp Size* YTG No. 38 Total 5800L 444 0 444 9500L 485 0 485 16,0001. 16 0 16 22,000L 4 0 4 27 5001. 6 0 6__ •HfSh pres!ure Sodium Vapor 2. Total Assessment Units. YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 16,021 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 42 Total Assessment Units 16,063 as) Tot•i Total Annual Lamp Size LavL Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800L 444 X f 8.93 X 12 S 47,579.04 9SOOL 485 X $10.16 1 12 59,131.20 16,0001. 16 X Sie.08 X 12 2,319.36 22,0001. 4 X 513.84 X 12 664.32 27,530 6 X 515.31 X 12 • 2.939.52 Total Annual Maint. Cost • $112,633.44 2. Total Assessment Units. YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 16,021 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 42 Total Assessment Units 16,063 as) is t 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost . 51121.44 . E1.01 /year /unit nEy n s c N, oi Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled •Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1•, Annexation No. 36. Those diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the Oistric. and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assassment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4 Every year in May, the City Engineer files a -eport with tha City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 3s 8 41 A EXHIBIT •A" Propzrtles and lvryrovements to be included within Annexation No. 3P to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Asse!i. No. of L s t0 be Annexed Project Area a — 91,WUL 751 E Zone 1 'Zone 2 DR 87 -24 18.83 38 0 0 0 0 0 OR 87 -43 2.17 4 0 0 0 0 0 Total 21.00 42 0 0 0 0 0 mz r �Q 9 f f r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 38 C.- M oil� CPPY OF RANCHO CUCAlIOKOA Lys COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO � 5 ` STATE 0 C„ ALIFORNIA N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 98 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO?iOA Si COUNTY OF SAN AERNARDINO _ 5FS STATE OF CAI.LFVRKA Nim - PROJECT a 8 M. DATE: TO: FROM: RY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANC110 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 16, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Jrntor Engineering Aide ORDERING THE WORK IN C0IDIECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 1; FOR OR 87 -24, LOCKTE3 ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BUFFALO AVENUE. AVD SIXTH STREET, TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RECD MEWDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connertion with Annexation No. 15 to Landscape Maintenance District No, 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval Is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 15 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for OR 87 -24, located on the northwest corner of Buffalo Avenue and Sixth Street. The developer of the subject project has been notified of the public heariny by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -084. Respe5l u sbmfttd, u x / L � RHM:JA:dlw Attachments 36.- RESOLUTION NO. '37- 163 A Ra(;LuTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CURNECTION WITH AATIExATION NO. 15 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 87 -24 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did m the 11th day of February, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -085 to order tie therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 15 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 88&•OBS was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by la:v, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office or the City Clerk; and WHIAEAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of sat" Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement" , was duly and legally posted in the time, farm, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file to the office'of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons awning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described In said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -085, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last ling or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which it -spies were duly matted in the time, form, and manner as required by law, ,ears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clert id WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts % this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga chat the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby oriers that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 68 -085, be done and msde; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer F-Hee y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment FEF-Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin untTi armor- 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. 343 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 15 for OR 87 -24 SECTIGA 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code. State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has detorm'ned the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained In the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3 Plans and Specifications The plans hnd landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and at approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to :he subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkaay and median improvement cnnstruction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or /by the City. Based nn historical data, contract analysts and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal th'rty (S.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the project boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District 36Y Zone 2 is comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be &:tossed on net acre oasis for the mainterance of landscaped median islands on Haven � Avenue frcm 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street fray west to east City limit, Milliken Avcnuc and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street frm Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and mediae islands on other me3or divided highways and sane + parkways within the lnddstrial Specific Plan Area aid Foothill Boulevard overlay area The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District N0. 3 including Annexation No. 15 is as follows. Zone 1 Existing District Total estimated maintenance cost $2,070 , Assessment units 8 Total cost - assessment unit for year and month S2_70 5258.75 /year or S21.56 1mo. /lot Zone 2 Existing Annexation New District No. 15 Total Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. 0 0 0 Assessment units, acres 380,576 18.83 380,594 Total cost r assessment unit for year and month 0 x S.30 • S 0 /year 0 /mo. /acre —79D-.5W- Assessment shall apply to etch tot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram % attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A•, by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. 3GS I 1 SECTION 6. Assessment Iagrovements for the District are found to be of general benefit W all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or parcel in Zone 2. Thd City Council will hold a public hearing In June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs Incurred by the City, during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovere9 through assessments as requircd by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1572. geCTIOe 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's zport. 2. City Counc , adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hear rig date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every sear in Hay, the City Cnglneer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hea -ing and approves, or modifies and approves t;a individual assessments. 366 ., a.r rye ."0 %...- :,✓. ".�f' l: - �. �r'C Properties and laprovements to be included within Annexation No. 15 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE DR 87 -24 18.83 IMPROYEMENT AREAS TO BE A.NNUED IN AKYEXATION NO 1 Area Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 !th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 .� 7 4 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSeAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION NO. IS .SITE O .NK = NNK O u ]f•K �•F r hK lO I.0] ILI AKA l IfYK \ \ \� •K.C'� IfAK K tI lOt u. 1f< O i t nw.l s'll t �' 1MK t IWK� S�, IC YY 0 f ' 'f I 6th STR E T saes !' - - -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAa%fOtiGA w -- FNGI�IEERING DIVISION A ' T t Spin� VICINITY NIAP ILL \vl CITY OF RANCHO CUCA:dONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: SIGN ORDINANCE - Review of changes proposed by Chamber of ommerce M on nued fror, February 17, 1988) I. RECOM HOATICN: Staff recommends that the City Council review and cons —Tdcr t alternatives discussed in this report and provide direction, to staff to prepare necessary amendments to the Sign Ordinance. II. BACKGROUND: The City Council was presented with the Cha tier's F05- Rations regarding neon signs and window signs at their meeting of Febriary 17, 1988. The Council raised the following concerns: 1. Signage should relate to the land use /:one. 2. if too restr!ctive, sign regulations can hurt business. 3. Colors, materials, and maintenance of window signs should be addressed. After considerable discussion, the City Council continued th;s item to allow the Council time to review and consider the information presented. The Council also directed staff to highlight sections of the Sign ordinance that may need amendment. 111 ANALYSIS: A. Approach: This report presents alternative solution to aaWresss the City Council's concerns and the recommendations of the Chamber of Commerce regarding neon signs and window signs. The solution to the issues is two -fold. 1. Education - A proactive approach is needed to educate the busTFss owner of the City's sign regulations and advertising opportunities: 30 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: SIGN ORDINANCE March 16, 1988 Page 2 M a. The Small Business Guide being prepared by the Chamber of Coaerce explains the City's sign process and should be made available to their membership, particularly new members. The City Council coull Increase sign permit fees by $2.00 in order to provide a copy of the Sign Ordinance to all businesses with their application package. 8. b. Shopping center owners should take a proactive members /tenants /property promotional ampaigns a to let residents know of inhere to find them. A wanager should work wii joint advertising and events - all the tent maximum advertising bene would recommend that a c amending the Sign On Ordinance should be c rather than a 'major over and the Chamber of Commerce approach in educating their managers concerning wi advertising the practices their goods and services and shopping center owner and /or h his tenants In developing pectal sales or promotional nts working together means fit at minimum cost. Staff autious approach be taken to linance. Changes to the insidered as 'fine tuning' -haul': Aesthetics - The issues relative to types of allowable s gnl as the standards for size and design are best addressed by taking a cautious approach. Staff recommends that subtle changes to the Sign Ordinance be atw_pted first and the results monitored to see if the changes address the concerns of the Council and the Chamber. The next section of this report highlights areas of the Sign Ordinance where changes may be appropriate. Potential Amendments: External Neon 51 - Amending the Sign Ordinance to a ow neon s no ust a simple matter of lifting tha ban on neon. There are two major concerns regarding the use of exposed neon tubing: 1) aesthetics and L) safety. Staff believes that the aesthetics or 'quality' of neon signs can be adequately controlled through the sign permit process, as are other types of permanent, signs, and by adopting design guidelines. The issues of safety are relevant to window or other neon signs sispended in midair, Interior wall- mounted, and neon signs with open, exposed tubing. Generally speaking, exposed tubes are fragile and can be broken by high winds cr physical contact. Imprope• installation can also result in fire s-70 CITY COUNCIL STAFF RETORT RE: SIGN ORDINANCE March 16, 1908 Page 3 potential. The issue of safety is discussed at length in the attached study by the City of West Covina (see i' Exhibit 'A') Staff recommends that the following standards be considered for external neon signs: a. Limit their use to more intense commercial zones, such as: - Community Commercial - Regional Related Commercial - Regional Commercial b. Caquire totally enclosed installation c. Within shopping centers, allow as a part of a dniform Sign Program d Business identification only 2 Internal Neon St - Neon signs located in the s ore ran w row ave the samme issues relative to aesthetics and safety as externally mounted neon signs. In addition, there is concern regarding the numbor of neon signs, content and size. Staff would recommend the following standards be considered for neon window signs: a. Limit their use to commercial zones only b. Require totally enclosed installation c. Maximum size - 2 sq. ft. d. Ore per business e. No product advertiain2 or business names - must be generic, such as 'Beer or 'Open` 3 Wndow Si ns - Th: Sign Ordinance recognizes the need for temporary window ,mgns for certain types of businesses to advertise special sales. The majority of window sign violations are regarding the six (6) foot height limitation in the current regulations which the Chamber proposes to eliminate. In addition, Council and Commission havc expressed concern with the aesthetics of window signs and the length of time they are displayed. In particular, there were objections to the florescent colors used in painted window signs and the lack of regulations governing how long they may be displayed. Staff would recommend that the following standards be considered for window signs: 3"71 CITY COIN RE: SIGH March 16, Page 4 a. Limit their use to retail commercial zones only i b. Naximum height limit - 20 feet Allow for thirty days /event, 4 events /year Colors must be compatible to building design /colors Paper signs should be placed in frames v r !& 4n!- Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Nest Covina Neon Study Exhibit 'g' - Neon Airvey Exhibit 'C' - Window Survey Exhibit '0' - Nap of Commercial Zones Exhibit 'E' - Sign ordinance 37a- AGENDA "' Qrm- 11= .L-1.91Z kw,/1a m-. 1 TO Planning Coetaslan Grr of lrro Cerra Memorandum car ° Jamnlfer Jaffe Hwuber s, 1347 ?I men Ing Assistant susiscl: STUDY SESSIORl vormaxiort 190. 211 AKINDxER R0. 211 USA or EXPOSED REOm TOSIIIO y0E RIGUS A" AR- 4177MERA] 1,I2ETIS9 io recent years, there has Gen a dramatic Increase in-the use of neon 10 signs axd as en architectural Or design feature. Now Is regaining soar of the ground it last to canned electric sigoaga that replaced now Ln Der construction during the last twenty years. The contained iaeomtrin forma of Internally lit canned lights contrast sbarply with the flow of line and playful elegance that can be achieved with exposed neon sign• and designs. A far cry from the tacky blinking demnd for attention of old nocu, cucract neon design has evolved to embrace a refined graphic artfulness. Tie resurgence of neon has been roopted byy neon artiste god nrchltOotr, and their aeothetle 4oflumnae le readily apparent in tte &estate glow, and moderator line Of may contemporary neon 10VULlmtlOns. the refin*mmt of noon design in owed in part to the heritage of neon as algeage designed by m Logo es constrained by the self- toeselOneness that can be felt by artists, algnrakers for decade$ openly axplorad the design potential of neon for signs. The tradition of open exploration has be passed on to the artists and archLtpets now designing neon along with the craftspeople of the at;* Industry. I The Csty of West Cowlna recogeirea the reaurgaoce In the mm of exposed neon. Inquiries and proposals for the ease of exposed neon have Gar Increxslug. Local cities have enlivened their commercial districts with exyopd neon signs and architectural lighting. Therefore, esposad neon has bacon* a Laea of public policy regrlring the attention of the planning Comlgsion. The West COVIna Nuotcipal Code prohibits exterior exposed noon toting except that mach existed prbr to fsptambar 27, 1967. Thom are legal noneaoformlag signal raeonstruction and copy changes are prohibited (See. 26-347). The Code does not address neon I!ghting as an architectural feature. Recent Installation of neon has been allowed only when the tubing IS situated Inside a metal cue and covered with clear plaxiglass. T1A"Leg Cosmaieslon Resolution No. 2 -67 -1961 on Aequst S, 1967 called for a study of empnsed neon as •lgnage and architectural detailing to leform the Commission in its deliberation of the current prohibition of exposed neon 1"0. 26 -1071. Code revision to allnw neon Is not • simple Matter of lifting the ban on coon, however. Of concern are Issues of safety, glare, and aesthetics. The Code mat be st Lnmd for all passages relevant to the inclusion Of neon. 3*73 Ameadmont No. 211/weon PC/11-4/47/ - Passe 1 The study Undertaken Includes the following, • literature review • survey of cities Interview with representatives of several sign companies • consultation with Undernitark Laboratories engineer • consultation with the director of the Ruse" of Sam Art • exaaiu&ttOD of neon installations In several cities • study of sign codes of several cities • discussion with City of Rest Covina redevelopment and Cuildinq Departments and Chamber of C,reserca Two commonly hold mlaeoneaptions were rev jealed b the research. These rpand the eutrent as as see terminology am presence of aeon In the C ey of Rest Cut no. The ten 'noon- has beta commonly used to refer to all exposed glut tube lighting. In fret, aeon is one of two prinary gases (the other Is Argonl toad to crests color in exposed glass tube lighting. Colored glass tubes and phosphors are uAed In camb:nstiou with neon cad argon to create the various colors. twu in ar;wed plus tube llpbtfuq. The technically lecorrect but ccmew•aly used ton •nvoq• will be used here to refer to glass tube lighting. It to nut rscogotaed R%Asrally that both axpossd and unexposed neon arm slrudy present throughout Rest Cwina. In fact, exposed neon J !s So use es architectural detail 0. Interior design datalilaq, ,b and In signs. Onexpes.d now Is prevalent because of its use In Illualnated chancel latter signs. illoalmated channa-' latter signs are lit internally by none tubes encased In latter- shaped Ytai containers that are faced with translucent plastic. Examples of channel letter signs In Nest Covina Include Lave °s Restaurant on mostaar"t Now, nest'@ at Vincent sed 0loodora, the Ernsdvay, J. C Peaasy'@, and Twor Records at Fnohloo PLaa. Roues@ channel letters are another and Use canon torn of channel letter slgeage. Reveres channel letter signs are not lit Internally. fnctead, illualotioa free hahind the Individual letters creates a halo of light that sllhoustta@ the unlit letters. An esuple of reverse ebsnnel signs is the Hose IavLngs sign over the entrance od Vlocest Avenue a CALVey Avenue South. Several legally nonroeforeing exposed aeon signs, prosua,bly installed prior to 1967 (as mandated In want Covina R"lcipal Ccde See. 26 -107), are still In use. V, lag of these tam be found at Jug and Cigger Liquor In the Country Club Cuter at Citrus and Garvey, Lucky Market at workman and Citrus, and The Holiday Inn on Gat Garvey Avenue North. Fashion Plus call shops have Utilized exposed neon as shop signs on their treat walls facing the rall Interior. Thor signs ate comparable In function to the trout signs on the exterior of non -call stores. The signs comply with the Sign Code at Interior aeon Rocently several businesses have lncluEed noon secants as an Iategto component of their interior design. Exposed tubes decorate and hl yyhl:ght the architecture an the Inte:lcr of the Wherehouse, Holiday Spa, and Circuit City at west Cowl" Village, Tarr RecordA at Fashion Plau, and Standard Shona at Olendars and Vine 3711 Amendment Va. 211/Room 90111 -4-97 - Pane 1 Many businesses have neon vied" signs. While beer signs in liquor stares immediately cams to mind with the mention of aeon window signs, many other window signs exist. A notable exampla is the wind" aeon at Minns Restaurant at Last Garvey Avenue South mar Sarranca Avenue Another example is the restaurant sign In the window at Mr. Wok to west Covina Village. A few buildings have new exterior neon. because of the prohibition of outdoor exposed Osoa, resent Installations hate been generally required to sense the noon In a metal frees and ewer it with clear plaxlylass. This Attempts the look of exposed noun vhile complyIng with the restrietinne on exposed neon that are Imposed by the West Covina Sign Coda. An example of this 1s found at sanieh Nagle In Post Cuvina Village. " Although the safety of outdoor exposed neon lighting has bean questioned, use of neon in chesnal lettering and late -ior well - mounted noon have not been raised as an ores of concern by the Planning Commission. Research for this study reveals that Issues of safety are relevant to wladwr chaxnsl, and Interior wall - mounted neon Installations. It may be necessary.for the plannlad Commission to examine the safety regalrement• of all uses of neon lighting. area History Weoa atlas, invented in francs to 1910, rare introduced to America in 1922 by a Los Angeles car salesman who Installed new signs over ,sake ckerd Showroom. During the following two decades, noon was used locrsaaingly as slynage and as archltsctiral detailing. Animated aeon •'7as proliferated and became central to the ldantity if urban places such an Las Vega Audi Times Squgre. Commercial districts throughout the country Included aeon .S part of their stgatscapas. Many noon signs were extingolshed during World Mar II. bath austerity and reduced light along the coasts mare necessary to wartime. The reklndlinq of neon lights after the war symbolized the end of the constrAtnt that ran eSsantiul to the rcr effort Much of the neon that was darkened by the war "a nevet re-lit Instead, the aesthetics and technology of the 1930'8 and 1f:0's lad to the supplanting of neon byy plastic signs. Noon as aretlteetural detailing also became uaf wt cable. During the 1990'• and 1970's, new constructian no longer employed agent so neon began to be associated with alder less vital urban arse. Cities began to legislate against the use of neon Some, such sew Glendale, required the dismantling of all neon. Others restricted neon to varying degrees or, as has West Covina, prrn ohibited construction of new Oman while allowing existing neon to While city governments legislated the restriction or prohibition of uson, artists began to explore nevus 4%da ndlm. An appreciation developed for the character of light mad the artistry of the neon design that graced theater marquess, highlighted architectural featured o[ buildings, and embellished the eigas that had long boon associated rlth the urban landscape. preservation efforts emerged to challenge the denalltion of "Jar neon Installations that was "curing In the name of 'wdernivatlon 3-7s .; is •.� . -- .. :tiv .< 'tr Aaandxant So. 217 /saoa PC /11 -4/81/ - PAae a The "placation of dean AS an art coding, the efforts Of soon to pesserve coca signs, 1950'• nostalgia, and the aesthetic taa•IrgGnce of art darn and pant- sodetalat arabltectdre have led to this currw.c recalrsenet of neon . tleoa sculpture, to addition to now neon sigas end arebltoetuzal datalllnq, have beaeae increasingly Astoelaced with the me dada vitality and aesthetic sophhtleaelon of the 1980'8. Characteristics of the Current public policy status of aeon Include the following. 1. As previously discussed, grsat disparity exists in the treatownt of Oman by cit:u. 2. Municipal constraints fall Into Ana two gain cateaariea of aesthetics and safety. 1. The distinction is sonotlaes bat not always made between nwan as dgnage, architectural detail. or art. The awlelpal codes and design review processes of cities differ accordingly. e There to an particular logic or ppredletablllty to the treatment of noon by cities. whtlo the asengatlon night be lids that titles know for their concern for design or rapid growth would allow neon goat liberally, nnh is dot the use. RrAmples Include Santa Monica, which trues all nsoo, Including Interior sculptures, am signals. Rancho Cucaacoga prohlblts noun and Is currently engaged In the reaoval of all existing neon. Meanwhile, rwcently the MacArthur Park Art Project funded the refurbishing of neon signs that Lad regained darkened since utl II on bdlldhys surrounding the park. Landlords entered Into agrecnant with the Pro]ncit easmmUthq to finance the lighting of the rofurblshed slum In Now York City, city policy seeks to maintain the tradition of large noon algns surrounding Timm Square. New develop - sent of high rise buildings is eehwdulad to replace the current buildings end neon algns. Chian outcry favoring Theo Square's visual heritage o[ ne00 algns prompted the city to mandate large electric vlgns do the aides of all now bulldingI lacing Time Square. R Progressive urban vitality is wpwszed In coon, which after all ""a •awe` in 0reek. Los Angeles, site of the first American use of neon, regales an arena for Sonovatisn, etploratlou and w� apreciation of noon f the is the MUSOMA of Mena ktt.0founded 1n1Los l gelueln 19121uates �+ Munleloal Trsstgant o Neon While dented and use of tnao lnereasm, the aSIn ' constraints or a[ many cities. ulrs la many r Kid*differ s exil.lcloe Muds Stns policies relazdhq . Som islet to Ic p licie '�. municipal codes• thnlelpal coda gene an speoltle Meefloe Oa rood, truthsg It u specific treating do and signals /or llsigns. and Other ties allow my In wind" signs. or Other elelo a13ow aeon only le dude, dell only es Less es xllw chit, but l*!, by s. extra design ign ro abating IMAIA oa review rpulre Ong. 3 . Other concerns. "nl Coemluloas. Other alelu, zaapoadlaq to ulaey eoneeros, untats re to safety Characteristics of the Current public policy status of aeon Include the following. 1. As previously discussed, grsat disparity exists in the treatownt of Oman by cit:u. 2. Municipal constraints fall Into Ana two gain cateaariea of aesthetics and safety. 1. The distinction is sonotlaes bat not always made between nwan as dgnage, architectural detail. or art. The awlelpal codes and design review processes of cities differ accordingly. e There to an particular logic or ppredletablllty to the treatment of noon by cities. whtlo the asengatlon night be lids that titles know for their concern for design or rapid growth would allow neon goat liberally, nnh is dot the use. RrAmples Include Santa Monica, which trues all nsoo, Including Interior sculptures, am signals. Rancho Cucaacoga prohlblts noun and Is currently engaged In the reaoval of all existing neon. Meanwhile, rwcently the MacArthur Park Art Project funded the refurbishing of neon signs that Lad regained darkened since utl II on bdlldhys surrounding the park. Landlords entered Into agrecnant with the Pro]ncit easmmUthq to finance the lighting of the rofurblshed slum In Now York City, city policy seeks to maintain the tradition of large noon algns surrounding Timm Square. New develop - sent of high rise buildings is eehwdulad to replace the current buildings end neon algns. Chian outcry favoring Theo Square's visual heritage o[ ne00 algns prompted the city to mandate large electric vlgns do the aides of all now bulldingI lacing Time Square. R Amendment, No. 213/Neon PC /11 -4/s7 - Page S S. Most Cities do not fully Andrus safety maswres for aeon Installation presaging that adopting the provisions of the Underwriters Laboratories (06) and the National electric Code I21C) adequately provide for safe :astallation. Nwever, (� only certain "thuds Of erpOeed neOd toots Uatlon are addressed by UL and NEC as safe, while others ari not. Lacking in Mgt municipal coda are specific quldelires for sab installation of exposed neon that does not conform to the NIC.. The result of this shertcciaiog is that some cities severely limit the character and scope of exposed neon by requiring OL approved Installations, while others inadvertently allow "safe installations. 6. Current trends are "Using away cities to examina their policies regarding neon. It Is Increasingly on ttd political agoads. Increaainyy awareness and undsro"Odisg o[ safety luau L sscounglaQ responsible municipal code asroadrats to allow the greatest flexibility of design for safe lnclesion of exposed neon In signs and architectural detailing. Isfuja /Analysis A complete analysts of aeon as sign and desige should rte, ngnlas that noun estate In several forms and circumstances. Interior neon 1s found wall m untad, hung la window, teed evea suspended In aid- air- LxterlOr noun aacludes vallvountad channel, reverse channel, ruawy- avuetad and direct Muted alga and architectural,, detailing a wall a detached alga. Each foo and use of Aeon should be addressed to Insure that safety and aesthetic considerations arw set appropriately and thoroughly Three primary concerns regarding Aron were raised pcior to -Ila study$ glare, afatp, and Acsthstice. 4ch of tbsae has been researched, yielding the following findings$ Me" The quality Of light lbberect in exposed neon Is clear and bright. In the extrave, the clarity of aeon can be perceived as glare. It Is possible to prevent neon alara by limiting its ampertge. brightness of neon results from s combinatI04 of Amperags and glass tube dlaa p eter. govo requires e1Uer 30, 60, or 120 mllllasps. This power level Is ainlmal Conparsd to the 13••20 ups found In wall sockets/ a tens nags Implies, milllamps are 1 /1,000 of a amp. Limitation of exposed Aeon to 30 uill:amp Installations woulU preclude the possibility of "reasonable glare, an wall as Providing other benefits. Both risk of fire and energy consumption Ara lase In 30 millidmp installations than with 60 or 120 milllamps. there In a potential dlsadvantage in ilsitlnq coon Installations to 30 allllaps Since trlgqbtaess of ere.• s a function of the aoa- binatlon of glesA tuba livocter and pt Ar level, certain uses and /or designs vould lot ba possible. I.febltactural detailing and unusual design needs trey occaSIOnallp necessitate the use of either 60 or 120 milliamps. The affect crated v111 not necessarily be aLy brighter than that created with 30 ai111aAps in the c trosartance of wars r.sual installations. The risk of Illogical rsstrlctioa by limitlug to 30 milliamps Can be avoided. The code rrilslom can Include A "thod for derervinlnq special circumstances. The grating of • planning Dlrettor's Modification could then be employed to allow Installation that otherwise would have been unduly restricted ]sondnaat Mo. 111/Mean X11 -4-07 - Page s Safety _ Thy Issue of safety has ureral facets. Concern exists wee the vulnerability of exposed tubes, Injury from beckon tubs+, and potential for fires. A. vulnerability at taMs/potential for Salad Cxposad tubes are vulnerable to the elements, as are all glue Unhorse . Tubing can be broken by objects thrown at it. Once the tubing is broken, the qt* escapes sod Interrupt* the flow of Current. The only my a person could be shocked would be by Intentionally pla.ioq fingers directly into the en toena If left ClePalted In ss Caere 1C+C111aC1C. 19e broken circuit will soak a ground, red tier class, the seeing Correct can lead to flea In lnstallatloas lack fag prbpee lueulation. This to true for both oapooed and unexposed neon. Proper Installation and maintenance of neon allow, nun to be a very safe madlum to employ for signs end architectural dotal !+. The protection of own tubes and the reduction of the risk of harm from brdnn neon tubes tan be sot by covering nun lights. The disadvantage of this approach is that It un- necessarily limits greatly the reasonable use of sun. Staff believes that the loss of design flexibility Cocu- alated by required covering la unwarranted. Sufficient protection of exposed tubes would be provided by requiring that tubes be covered on all nun (Interior and exterior sign and designs) below the height of sight fast. Window Coca below the eight fact height limit ten be backed by a plsslglass enrlosurs. H Fire Potential The method of installation is rsseatial to the safety of noon. Underwriters laboratories (UL) has approved components for use in exposed neon Installation. However, the Installations themselves cannot be approved by UL. The National Electric Code (MCC), which has been adopted In the Nut Covina Municipal Cools, governs in part the Installation of neon. The Installation of exposed noon Is not folly addressed In the NEC Research for this report has found concurrence among saver+\ experts regarding safe installation of expensed noon. Field observation of vacant Coca installations In several titles reveals several projects nit Installed as recommended. The risk treated by such Installations is of firs from Improper Insulation of all rospoacts, luong surveyed cities, lsatallatica requirements varied. Measures adopted included requiring fall Installation plans drawn up by a Tuallfled engineer, and/or full Inspection during installation. 378 , AmeosmentYO. 711/Naao K,tll -4 187 - Pace 7 Thera is sa Implicit uafety risk in simply requiring U.L. approved pasts. While so Installation say use only U.L. listed parts. it can at the same tl" be mute because It does not use all of tha cecasary parts, or does not use U.L. parts as recommended. For eraapla, field observation has resoled installations In which necessary electrode boesSnge are alsstng, wires are simply twisted together Instead. Technlully, all parti are C.L. approved yet the failure to enclose all alectroda In proper housings aekes the Installation eneafn. Noon in forms each as channel lettering, which Is act consldersd exposed neon, also should be exaalnd for the potential require - soot of Installation plans sad Inspections. KLlFFlyS3FE1 Ols"Ast with "pores has revealed several components necessary to safe and flexible Installation of neon. 6posd noon Sostallatlono are UL npprovsble only when contained In open channel letters or attathd to a "tai raceway that Is m or recessed Into the ontaide wall of a bulldloq. Nawavor, thf metal raceways are often unsightll, sad both they and canal -typo forms are inappropriate to the open movement of.lSne that can be crated with noon tube Sighting. Cps asposed coca atuchd directly to the allding well Is not UL approvable because It is not an Intact peduet that was assembled In a D.L. Inspected sign shop. This form of installation L• nonetheless able to ba as safe as DL approvable installations by rsauiriag the followings I •• Al! parts of tha Installation should a UL approved sad heed only ss approved. All electrodes most be contained In es elactrods housing. Ouick Ceansats electrode housings should not be allowed. Mire should be contalod In meta: conduit at all donee that It Is Inside a wall. I P.N. hoasintt ehoul,t be and for exterior wall Installations and raverd an the "tartar witb a rubber grommet. Perhaps classified C -6h Electric Si0n Contractors only should be allowed to do noon Installation. California Law Business and Professions Code also designates C -61 Specialty Contractors Llcsneea far signs, but this applies only to painted signs. Ths elassifleatiaa of C -10 General slsctrlcal Contractors License la Nought by same professionals not to prov.de sufficient training fdr the safe Installation of 64411 . To further Insure safe Installation. Installation plans shawlnq parts and methods to be uswd should be required sa Dart of Ne II t process. This permit process should appll to all neon leatsllatlons, whether sign or design, intorlor or exterior. Installation inopection should be made •m all noon signs that e"not be U.L. labeled. It will be nevesavy to coordinate regulation ylacd on neon with the codes ad workloads of both the Planning and Building depert- ments. Negalring A fee cold be eonstoszd for those noon Installations requiring a -site Inspections. The c- paeity of the Building Department is crucial to the safe regulation of neon. Notsoly, Ia the an Diego area represontatives cf the California Electric Sign Aseoelatloe ICESAI are Currently drafting Industry standards for the Installation of exposed neon that Is not covered by UL or NEC To& International Confers=. of Building officials, Soo C1e90 Captor, will review the CESA reoposal for Its potential adoption by San Diego area mualcipalitl•s. The draft completion Is expected In early 1940. 379 �v AMaCdmeaC tlo. 111 /tleon The purpose of the GSA eftorc is to &ddsata exactly the sawn Issues that have bean pursued In this study b? the City of Neat Covina. The San Diego CddA project reflects the growing recognition by Loth the sign Industry and sonieipalltlen that sets Installation of arpoaH noon 1s desirable and possible. The recassaad,tlon of the San Diego project should be revlsved when completed. Imes of code asendYgts that have base overlooked by this West Covina study could then be addressed. Aesthetic. The use Of neon has changed over the ?est several decades, although the own design styles of the 1 ?10•s through 19300, are reflected in soMa current design slameats of the meatus. Wont cities replete sovoeact in signs. The result is that neon ess:gn has refined to Insure strong graphic Impact without relianta on toy aorme eat. Now neon signs and architectural details refleet current assign ea.Tdards, not the garish Icutle of blinking electric vlrual bllgbt of the past. Increasing sophistication and elegance are cosbined with thn insets versatility of the medisa to contesporary neon. Seveial design lssueu emerge in consideration of exposed neon. The Planning Caeaisslon will need to address Chase. both generally and •ppeeeelficallw. generally, the Cammlselos s)wuld conalaar what dlstioctioo can N Made between neon as sivoave and as design. The Meet Covisa Municipal Code defines a alyn as any outdoor advartialn display or advertising struttuce' (Sec. 19-1001: This daftnition allow for sepArsts interpretation of neon lines and designs that contain 60 verbal Cr picture •efereoca t-. the business 4Isplaying the Ow essences a. In addition to conalleratlon of what essences should be employs, to deta.•wlne the dtstidetlon between acoa as Biqa or design, a thard testa May be eacsldered In the eases of a neon sign toonected to an architectural line. Will extra design approval be required for exposed neon? None to currently required for other architectural lighting or siguage. If there will be a design resle_, b/ vhos should it be done? The PlL.ntng CCAMisslon will need to deteraine in which part& of the City •red for what urn noon is allowed. Cempat!billty with special zoning such as overlay and sCgn plan areas should be considered. The design ragniresents of the daytLWa uhlit appearance of awn signs May M a concern of tha Plenatag Commission. Soso signs Include don -aeon under- letterr that show as a sign during daylight, while others do not. Another &&sign issue for potential Planning Commission deliberation Is the treatmeat of Intact" neon, especially when It Is clearly visible Irm outside the building. Measures In other cltlss Include treating all signs within throe feet of the vtodow as a Window sign, and calculating window signs as part of the esteaor .Igo allowance. The prinary concerns of safety sad aesthetics expressed prior to this stud? have bean addreved Additionally, onergy consumption, winteaance, and otner issues say esarge In futare discussant. 350 Aaeadeent 90. Ill /Meo,% 91/11 -9-97 - gage 9 Ilsctrical consusptloa is not a real Irnue for noon Lighting compared to lnmedoecent l4ghting. Limiting neon Installation to 30 mtillamp tsaoatormmrs limits "orgy consumption effectively. Regarding mmlatemme, properly installed neon tubes should r expected to last at letat 20 years, though traualormerb say toad replacing long before that. It is Important to recWnlso the lapartanet of mmlntomhre for been the safety and aesthetic quality of noon. It Is possible to replace tubing stations within a very short pooled of tlmm, and the quick repplvsmmnt of damaged tubing sho -1d ba sspeeted. Code "forcemeat Is dltflcult when signs can only be checked at night, but In thin matter neon pouts no yrsster problem than ssy other tom of electric light. most Covina Muniolwl Code The Municipal Code espeel.11y the sign code will need revision In order to be rwpatible with the re- lntroducticn of exposod com. Additions will be mcsuary in the fonln7 sad Suildinq Sections of the Municipal Code to support policies adopted by the 9lannt119 Commission rcga.dLnw the ansthrtice and ale Installation of noon signs and 402190 features Cole sections that sight h at lssto include, but are act limited to the followings Sec. 26 -301b Attached signs -All attached signs... must be blyd and vomin proof- In the past, concern bas been enrnsed war the potential for birds to rent In the curves of map d tubing. However it wa not felt by professionals in the flail that this was likely or that It would cooetituts soy tors of danger. Sec. 26 -107b Illumination •4sp"od noon tubing shall not be permitted on outdoor elyne. ax.opt that such signs erected pprlcr to eeptember 27, 1967, shall be dowsed loges nonconforming o1g02. only normal sign aalntenanee shall be pormltted and copy changes or sign race struetim stall not be paraltted.• Soo. 26 -a0g Square yoctage Calculation The _nmattuctiCa characteristics of neon elgnaqe my require a diflerant method of determining egnaro footage, Depending an how neon signage is diatingutahsd from neon architectural detailing, square footage calcelatlon might require consideration. Sec. 26 -110 Nonconforming signs State balleves that It is posolble that, wen with the cainstatement of neon soya existing neon signs will retain nonconforming because of such factors AN installation requirements Identification of spwiflo ways in which current eon- eooforminq neat signs can be reconstructed or altered say Drove helpful. The Planning Commission say wish to consider an esmrtlxatlon period to bring currant non- conforming neon up to code. Additionally, mmasures for the continued protection of existing neon should be considered Bail Amadmant So. 213/"Ron PC /31 -4/67 - Pago 10 Sac. 36 -711 variance or OOP,s IL the Planaing Commission Intends to all" neon via variance or unclassified nor permit# it my be a consideration whether t+ allow that the sign regulations of Lba undarlying zone shall Apr except that within the residential roes, the sign Prfvlleg if the O -P tone my be utilized-. , a". 36 -177 ►root Signs IAdy"tiologl Inclusion Of need will rMUlrs a change frm -mostly pointed Or it v attachable gold or silver leaf or similar mterial, aleapt to the O-P and I -P Zones whet* such signs shall be limited to gold or silver leaf or similar material.- she addltiou of the materials Inherent to "posed neon Will t- necessary. Sec. 26 -173.3 Stccad Story Ides..lfIC%tiaa Signs same lder whether elarlficatica is necessary to allow name as •Illuminated Internally.• (16 -133.3 b) Sec. 14-136 rladown Inclusion Of neon will require wnding •Advertising algqal... must be Of attachable gold or silver lelf or similar "tsclalr ('i.e. 36 -196 a). Planning COmmfeslon may datemide the need for vlga permits for neon window signs. If so, amndmiat will &W, ueaesuay of 090 alga permit is sequSred.• (Sme. 36 -136 b) •- SAO. 36 -370 Lighting and SAO. 31 -97. Ixtetioz Design Apple. - to be compatible with the colatrtducttm of arp x d neon as sAgnage as architectural detail. As stated previously, the Sullding Coda may need rsvlsior to conform with Any inNtallation requlremalt* determined by Cho Planning Coasi$a1on. The proper and eOmPlute Amodloy of We Municipal Cade can all" that neon sigma need not be individually reviewed by the Planning Comlgalon eo compliance will imply compatibility. Precise Plaa and sign Program MAY supplement the process. CONCLUSION Stcff believa. .,at It 1* necessary to all" exposed neon signs and Atchltectutel de'-mils that are not UL /NZC approved installations if VA art to all" conteeporary Race design any flexibility. Given appropriate Installation guidelines outlined previously In this report, the neon Installation will be very sate. The Olty of Nast Covina will benefit from the thoughtful leglalatlon of safety constraints that do not lmpinge on design creativity. The *levant excitement of neon Will contribute to the pride and enthusiasm Nest Covina feel$ mew and anticipat*e for the future. REVIENEO AND APPROVED Pa tr c a Ma ey Planning Director 38a- Jennifer Jaffe planning Assistant 0 t Y Y Y y Y O O Y Y a M Y J9 Y Yq i p Z� p.. a� eN 0 9r 0lG 8� O YY o� q• ap Y O C Y O U tl Y� MY L YY M Yi P . Y Y 3 P P N � YP q�Y r GG P :30 n s Sir p �p �16 a9® �; Y 7 Y 0 M r aY • +i �+ �Y 8� I • � Y `1 J4 h . �• � � � O 9 yy yo�p CC TOE � 99xyx M y . 38s Y Y � T � • 4 W i• i� ye 99 n 9.. . o ue SJJd 6 i Y M1� d • i yy i� U > • U Kr • Y � 0 > • w AM 9 O w 1 O T OO Cli �p e • Op p • O OpN p Yd • Y P pp J C Y 8r V 1Y� A U 3 Y� Ypp i y J Y M• �Q0 C n YJ9 Y JO • Q y 0 ■Y . • Yy • O,1 O Y Y � w p C wyy Y 31 U� W Y.w. 7 V ,1 id > 01� 38s , 384 ° SODRC" CONS OLTED Joe Besslay, Ha@tb a Co. 1225 Lac yy street Loa angoras CA 90031 -1667 (213) 121 -4141 Dave Boyer Argon Kenn Sagas 545 Allen Avenue, 622 Ban Discs CA 91771 171f) 592 -1861 Van thlera Acadesy Signs 1340 M. San BernardlLo Covina CA 9172: (7101 915 -5694 Roy Plabiva 19asber, Board of Director7, - California Electric Sign Association) ;. President Pacific Sign Construction, Inc 2151 Harrison National City CA 92050 (619. 474 -8566 L111 Laklch Hugo" Dtracto[ Nary Carter Russ" of Neon Art 704 Traction Avenue Los Angola@ CA 90013 (213) 617 -1580 Yoraa Makov, Graphic Cerlgne[ CLaroaonc Ora hic Servicas 100 a. Pcnthif1 Claraanat CA 91711 (714) 625 -7291 Scott Penn K, ingind*r Ondarvritsr• Laboratories 1655 Scott Boulevard Santa Clara CA 95050 (400) 985 -2400 David Starts Creative Display Electric Sign Manufacturing 11258 Buena Boulevard 61 Monte CA 91731 1818) 441 -6155 David Sutherland David Sutherland Design 14 HugbeB, Suite 203 Irvine CA 92718 1710 360 -9866 Mary Stoddard, Graphic Designer Cha r2oraon Architectural Comla@ion City of Claromont 207 Harvard Claremont CA 91711 4714) 624 -4531 , 384 S 1 S, L1 S .VE 60 .f� .� La00 BaaeD i A1D+�D[s Loa Aa7alaa D saga • �,,yaean A[cadla BavaclY Bill. �atclai[ " Claawoat Anota:aY BNoD ,,,Pact Covina •y + 03,604&10 Ontario ^Qa eln9COn BueD won' COea� x , a Bu SadostCY B .4laadn 1[vloo Baa BLYa Wan Ba[ata9a Lag "a La Va[aa S 1 i� J NEON SIGN REGULATION SURVEY r Neon Vail Neon Window City Signs Permitted? Signs Permittei? Agoura Hl;ts No No Anaheim No No Beverly MIlls Yes No Clovis Yes Yes Duarte Yes No Irvine Yes Yes La Varna Yes Yes as Vegas, Nevada Vas No Monrovia Yes No San Jtan Capistrano NO No Thousand finks No No Tuscon, Arizona No No A. i WINDOW -SIGNS MaAmn Sign Ama• aty Surveyed Ar4h.an 20 La VWN se f<onrna 25 /on Jwn OmpbUlm 23 fhcuwd OW 2/ A MM QMnow" /p 0 e V 1e 20 2e 00 08 40 Fa0/trt • pwourt o11Dttl WVWm Area ®` [m MUs 9 So mi ca t.tal_ i t Rill - Y t Y 1 � I INDUSTRIAL SITES: Rambo Cucamonga eowring 32 square miles. hot Opprox• knolaYS000 acres prewNlyvaried talntlugry. Parcels cha1F able range In 5U• hem X cues lole to 100 acres. Land prices range from S4.5D1SQUO1ef001 fcrrnw9 lots lo MOW peroere and If are for target parcels The tartan It unlsonnwBb 111i dupe, drainage Is ,,cellont Subsoil Is sandy loom and plOngs wo nal rogWred San owafor moue run loom 6 to 24 arch" Sewer Ones range born 0 to 241nehes. The 9085 haw ocaon to all uOlIffer, fad and koudder wade [11110i 'Silo data c,mplled in cooP9tatlon win City Engineer are industrial Devo"M INDUSTRIAL WASTE AND SEWER SERVICE: T,Gt MBMplord mvrsetland operated: Chino Basin Municipal Weser Clsmd Plant Capech . 24.5 Million Gollons/Da/ (Peak Ono FIOW 22 Mllepn Gat/D" Collection S,Atom Cucamonga County Woot District (Tediory freamonl copabillfas avalable Of rho PlOnig The sowat rata ao based upon flow. biological osygen demand. and rotor suspentlod sollda InduddOl wastewater permits are requk W byall!ndu9tla 119914 Ord pr9heament My be required Mato ate D,,Orties for non•reclolmobl9 wastewater I"wwar comeetbn charges we based upon a front footage roe, a residua 000090 too COPOCdy acquHition lea. and a sewer assessment lee. WATER SUPPLY: Supplier Cucamonga County watir District Maclmum Pumping Capacity Web$ 35 4 Million GolorW Day Canyons 6 rumors 11 7 Million GGUOPJ /DOy Emergency Mehopoinan Water District 11 5 MGD Reservcu Capacity SO 5 Million Gallons Avotage Dairy Consumption 20.5 Million Gollons/Day BFmorihry rates by hundred cuolc loot fated by use Motor and l9N4ce connection cbctge TRANSPORTATION: RaR Soria Fe. Southam Pacific. Union PacLtc Truck li local and long dld0114e bur* 111109 Air, Ontario bJarwllonal Airport tlhecfN 3Qoconi to she soufhom COY Lim". provides International am hoar continental swAcewlih da0yscheduled pass ngwand al height seMCO But GrvVtmr , CoMmentat Irderpommuny OrnnFhans p, vk bgfagubrs9MewDWLA- Lilco. Pvabarall(Eloerty and HonOkapPar). and ROD Water. Do W water port facilities are about 50 miles away at Los Angeles and long Bacon harbors. or at San Diego 3 tour$ away Highways. LLS 66. State H" 30. mlof"011 /0 artd IS- ELECTRICAL POWER: Name of SUpP)Igr, Southern Cdlfondo Edison Comparw For rates opp2coble tome eeya Rancho cuccmanga, contact the $o. CoNOmlo Edison Co. o51u,IOcaf9d of 422 K 2nd Ave., Upland CA 91785 (714) 986.5861 NATURAL GAS: Name of Supplier. Southern CollforNo Gat Company For rates applicable to the CRY Of Rancho Cucamonga, conact me So. California Gas Co, office located of SOU Wed B Sltoet Oriado, CA 91762 (714)964-12C2. AREA WAP 810 RANCHO ,Q ?, CUCAMONI rain FOHIAM TELEPHONE. ONIA Name of Supplier General Telephone Company ^ M to For faros applicable to me City of Rancho CucomongLL % g�9 contact me Gan9rol falOPhone once, locoed of 207 , Woo 0 Strout Onlarin, CA 91767 Or at 9799 Baseline Rd. ' I ; \� ROmhOCucamongo.CA91730 (714)983.1811 38 Q nP.AFT' ONLY Foy 01pirU3L;"j Chapteras Title 14 SIGNS 14.04 Pur oae and Intent IT= n t on• TT= MEME tation 13-I'S c sera rev aione TT.-23 E n Regulations M-27 Dos n Stan er a 14.24 NoVCOnfr MIEE_a1ans Chapter 14.04 PURPOSE AND INTENT Sections: 14.04.010 Declaration of need. 14.04.020 Objectives and basis. 14.04.010 -- 7.4.04 020 9"I � 4:115FOOTOIO 14.04.010 Declaration of need. A. The city recognizes the need for signs as a means to Oentify businesses within the community. The city finds that signing is an important design element of the physical environment Provisions con- sistent with the goals and objectives of the community are necessary to insure that the special character and image the community is striving for car be attained while serving busi- ness needs in the community The city is striving to pro - vide an economically stable and visually attractive community through high quality site planning, building design, land- scaping and signing. As a planned architectural feature, a sign can be pleasing and can harmonize with the physical character of its environment Proper controls can achieve this goal and will make the city a more attractive place to live, work and shop. 0 It is the purpose of this title to make the city attractive to residents, visitors and commercial, industrial and professional businesses while maintaining economic sta- bility through an attractive signing program (o-d. 65 -B 51, 1983: Ord 65 51 0, 1979). 14.04.02014.04.020 0b1ectives and basis. basis. The ob;ectives ..nd basis For the various s qn regu at ions contained in this title are: A To direct persons to various activities and enter- prises, in order to provide for the maximum public coonn��venience: 163 ( T qa 12/83) 396 14.04.020 B. To provide a reasonable system of controls fur signs, to insure the development of a high quality visual environment; C. To a ^courage signs which are well designed and pleas- ing in appearr..ce and to provide incentive and latitude for varlet:-, good design relationship, and spacing; D. To encourage a desirable urban character which has a minimum of overhead clutter; E. To enhance the economic value of the community and each area thereof through the regulation of such thins as size, n;uabor, location, design and illumination of signs; F. To encourage signs which are compatible with adjacent land uses; G. To reduce possible traffic and eafety hazards through good signing; and !f. To protect the general public health, safety and welfare of the community. (Ord. 65 51.1, 1979). Sectional 14.06.010 L4.08. 020 14.08.030 14.08.040 14.08 050 14.08.060 14.08.070 14 08.071 14 08.080 14.08 090 14.09.100 14.08 110 14.08 120 14.J8.130 14 08.140 14 08.150 14 03.160 14.08.170 14 08.171 14 08 180 14.08.190 14 08.200 14.08.210 14.00.220 14.00.230 14.08 240 14.08.250 14 08 260 Chapter 14.08 DEFINITIONO Generally. Advertising struct•ire. Area of sign. Banner, flag, pennant or balloon. Building face. Business directory sign. Business identification. City planner. Conatruction or contrac ^cr sign. Con.enience sign. Copy. Directional sign. Director of community cielopment. Development review. Flashing sign. Freestanding sign. Future tenant identification sign. Grand opening. Ground sign. Height of a sign. Inoperative activity. Interior sign. Monument sign. Nonconforming sign. Off -Site sign. Off -site subdivision sign. On -site subdivision sign. Pedestrian traffic sign. (Rancho Cucamonga 12/83) 164 31. Sectional Continued) 14 08.270 14.08, 280 14.08.281 14.08.290 14.08.300 14.08.310 14.08.320 14.08.330 14.08.340 14.08.350 14.08.360 14.09.370 14.08.380 Political sign. Portable sign. Promotional sales sign. Rsal estate sign. Revolving sign. Roof sign. Roof. sign. Special event sign. Temporary sign. Vehicle sign. wall sign. Window sign. 1:.08.010-- 14.06.On0 14.08.010 Generally_. For the purposes of this title, the following words &:2- phracas shall have the meanings eat forth in this chapter. (Ord. 65 S1.2(part), 1979). 14.08.020 Advertising structure. 'Advertising struc- ture" means an on -n to or of;Ate structure of any kind or character other than the main business idantification signs, erected or maintained for outdoor advertising purposes, upon which any pcetc. -, bill, printing, painttag, or other adver- tieement of any kind whatsoever may be placed, including statuary for edvertising purposes. (Ord. 65 51.2(1), 1979). 14.08.030 Area of st n. "A -ea of sign" shall include the ent ie area %e t n any type of perimeter or border which may enclose the outer limits of any writing, representation, emblem, figure or character, together with any other material or color forming an integral part of the display or used to differentiate such sign from the background on which it is platen. The area of a sign having no such perimeter shall be computed by anclosing• the entire area within parallelograms, triangle& or circles in a size sufficient to cover the entire area and ccmpu.ing the size of suc': area. In the case of a two -sided sign, the area shall be computed as including only the maximum single display surface which is visible from any ground position at one time. The supports or uprights on which any sign is supported should not be included in deter- mining the sign area unless such supports or uprights are dcaignsd in such a manner as to :orm an integral background of the sign. In the case of an} cylindrical sign the total a.ea shall be computed on the total area of the surface of the sign. (Ord. 65 51.2(2), 1979). 14 40 Banner fla oennant or balloon. "Banner, flan, oe. ...t or bal eon" means a% cloth, bunting, plastic, paper or similar material used for advertising purposes attac ed to or pinned on or from any structure, staff, pole, 165 (Rancho Cucamonga 12/83) 39a- 14 08 050 -- 14.08.110 line, framing, vehicles or other object lord. 65 -8 52, 1903t Ord. 65 51.2(3), 1979)• 14.08-01 d Built ovatfone, P %ntilraar,ioreaideanin which area o a the business is located. (Ord. 65 -II 53. 1983: Ord. 65 51. (4), 1979) 14.08 060 Business director-' sign. "BUSinees directory sign" moans a 1 gn ocated n a mu t�tenant complex which lists each business and address located therein. (Ord. 65 51.2(5), 1979) 14 L.08 Business identification. "Business identi- ficat on" moan an on a gn wh ch entifies the business located thereon. (Ord. 65 61.2 (6), 1979). 14.08.011 Cit lanner. "CS•:y planner" means tno divi- sion c e p :e p ann.rg divisi^ "• (Ord. 65 -8 S4, 1983) 14.08.080 Canetrt:etion or contractor si n. - Construction nnmesnoLathe individuals sand /orp firms s connectad the and/or or construction of a project. Such signs may include the name of the project, the address of the business, and the emergency telephone number (Ord. 65 51.2(7), 197° >• 14. O8.090 Convenience ei n. "COnvenienta sign" means a sign nee arger tnan tour square feet in area and no more conveys than four feet in height and whentrance, ortmi ortbU31nosA as "restrooms " "no parking," identification for dirctionaurposes,motorist3. (Ord. to an is be viewed on -site by pedestrians 19791• 65 -8 55, 1993: Ord. 55 51,2(8), 14.08.100 cc • "Copy" moans ary words, letters, numbers, gure9. de a igns or other symbolic r1479;entatione incorporated Into a sign. (Ord. 65 51 2(9), 14 08-110 Directional si n " Directional sign" etoc eans a sign -whit contains words ouch as "entrance," contain - "exit," "in," "out" or other similar words or a sly` ,no arrows or characters n with su- ntwordec on separately- It used either in conjunction feet in area and o more shall be no greater than our square than four fees lniheight rde name information s1A,l subdivision ain shall any advertising o directional sig983o110 ronot be included ,1197915 categcry. (Ord 6.-B 56, 1 (Rancho Cucamonga 12/83) 166 393 �.,r 14.08.120 -- 14.08.180 14.08.120 Director of communl[ ,:a L212 want. "Director of common ty eve.opclant" means the director o�ehe community development of the city. (Ord. 65 51.2(11), 1979). 14.08.1.0 Doyolo meet review. "Development review" means a me-a% 1 o reviaw by t e city planner ee stipulated in Section 1.Je.090 to determine conformance with applicable ordinance&. (Ord. 65 -8 57, 19831 Ord 65 51.2(12), 1979). 14.08.140 Flashing sign. "Flashing sigii" means any sign whicn contains or s uminated by lights which are intermittently nn and off, which change intensity, or which create the iiluston of motion in any manner. (Ord. 65 51.2 (13), 197^). 14.08.150 Frsestandin si n. •Freestanding sign• means a sign w c s permanent y supported by one or more uirights, braces, poled, or other similar structural components when utilizing earth, rock, the ground or any foundation sat in the groand as a primary supportive base, which does not exceed twenty _vast in height. (Ord. 65 51.2(14), 1979): 14.08.160 Future tenant identificati •FVtuse a tepord s tenant i ent cat on sign" means qn which identifies a future use of a site or building. (Ord. G5 51.2(15), 1979). 14.08.170 Grand opening. "Grand opening" means that promotions —activity used Dy newly established businesses, within t irty days after occupancy, to inform the public of their location and contribution to the ccmmunity. "Grand opening" daas not mean an annual or occasional promot'in if retail sales by a business. (Ord. 65 51.2(16), 1979). 14.03.171 Ground ski n_ "Ground si " means a sign wnich is not a monument s qi n, but which is affixed to the ground and used solely for special advertisement purpcsea or as a direc- tional and convenience sign, as permitted in this title. (Ord. 65 -8 58, .983). 14.08.180 Nei ht of a Sign. "Height of a sign" moans the greatest vertica stance mersured frola the grade at the point the sign supp(rts intersect the ground and any accompany- 1.19 architectural features of the sign Hovever, if the sign is corstructed upon an artificial berm, the height of the siq as measured from tto toe of slope or band, shall not exceed one hundred fifty percent of the maximum haight allowed by this title. (Ord F.5 51.2(17), 1979) 167 (Rancho Cucamonga 12/831 3941 14.08.190 - -14 08.280 14.09.190 inooerat ive activity. "Inoperative activity" means a buaineae or activity that has ceased operation at any given location for a continuous period of at least sixty days. (Ord. 65 -B 59, 19831 Ord 65 51.2(18), 1979). 14.08.200 Interior si n. 'interior Sign' means a sign inside o any buslnesa that cannot be seen from outside the building in which the business is located. (Ord. 65 51.2 (19), 1979). 14.08.210 Monument sign. "Monument sign" means a free - standin­g`-317n a _sae than eight feet in height, incorporating the design and building materials accenting the architectural •hems of the buildings on the same proporty. (Ord. 65 -B 510, 1983: Ord. 65 $1.2(20), 1979) 14.08.220 Nonconformin ei n. "Nonconforming sign' means s gn lawfully erected which does not comply with the provisions of this title. (Ord 65 -B 511, 19831 Ord 65 51 2(21), 1979) 14.08.230 Off -site sign. "Off -site sign" means a sign which advertises or &4jacts attention to products or activi- ties that are not provided on the site upon which the sign 1s located. (Ord. 65 51. 2(22), 1979). 14.08.:40 Off -site suodivisior, ai "Of? -site subdi- vision sign" means a sign n actor ante with this title, which directs traffic to a subdivision within the city. (Ord 65 51.2(23), 1979). 14.08.250 on -site subdivision sign. "On -silo subdivi- sion s guns a sign which i •enti ies the subdivision upon which the sign is located. (Ord 65 51.2(24), 1979) 14.08.260 Pedestrian traffic si n. "Pedestrian traffic sign" means a sign subject to t n s ze limitations listed in this title which is other than the main business identifica- tion sign and which is oriented to pedestrian traffic Such sign shall not include any advertising information. (Ord 65 51.'(25), 1979). 14 08.270 Political SS n. "Political sign' means a sign erected pr or to an a ect on advertise or identify a candidate, campaign issue, election proposition, or other related matters. (Ord. 65 51.2(26), 1979). 14 08.280 Fortable si n "Portable sign" moans a sign not des gn—i permanently attached to a structure or to the ground (Ord. 65 51.2(27), 1979). (Rancho Cucamonga 12/83) 168 13 14T 14 08.281 - -14 08.350 14.0°.281 Promotional sales sign. `Promotional sales sign• means a sign erected on a temperary basis to promote the sale of new products, new management, now hours of opera- tion, a new service, or to promote a spacial sale. (Ord. 65 -B 512, 1983). 14.08.290 Real estate, sign "Real estate sign" means a temporary s gn advertising the sale or lease of the property upon which it is located, and the identification of the firm handling such sale, lease, or rent. (Ord. 6S 51.2(28), 1979). 14.08.300 Revolvin si "Revolving sign" means a sign, which a or a port on o may rotate either on an intermit- tent or constant basis. (Ord. G5 51.2(29), 1979). 14.J8.310 Roof si n. "Root sign" moans a sign erected, ronstruete ar p ace upon or over a root or parapet wall of a building and which in wholly or partly supported by such buildings. (Ord. 65 51 2(30), 1979). 14.08.320 Roof. "Roof" means the external upper cover - !ng o a ui ng or structure. (Ord 6S 51.2(31), 1979). 14.08.330 Sign "Sign" means a device, fixture, surface, or strocturo o any kind or character, made of any material whatsoever, displaying letters, words, texts, illustrations, symbols, forms, patterns, colors, texture::, shadows, or lights, or any other illustrative or graphic display designated, con- structed, or placed on the ground, on _ building canopy, wall, post, or structure of any kind, to a window, or on any other object for the purpose of advertising, identifying, or calling visual attention to any place, structure, firm, entarprise, profession, business, service, product, commodity, person, or activity, whether located on the site, in any structure on the site, or in eny other location. The term "placed" includes constructing, erecting, posting, painting, printing, tacking, nailing, gluing, sticking, sculpting, carving, or otherwise fastening, affixing, or making visible in any manner whatso- ever (Ord 65 -8 513, 198j: Ord 65 51.2(32), 1979) 14.08.340 5 pedal event sign. "Special event sign" weans a temporary s gn w c. a vez tisea special events and activities such as grand openings, charitable events, Christ- mas trees, and fireworks. Such signs are limited to the provisions listed in this title. (Ord. 65 S1.2(33), 1979) 14 08.350 Temporary sign "Temporary sign" means a sign erecce� or a temporary purpose attracting attention to an activity as provided for within this title. (Ord. 65 51 204), 19791 169 (Rancho Cucamonga 12/83) 396 14.08.360 -- 14.12.030 14.08.360 Vehicle si n. "Vehicle sign" means a sign which in attached to a veh .cle which is parked an or adjacent to any property, the principal purpose of which is to attract attention to a product sold or an activity or business located on the property. (Ord. 65 -B 514, 1983: Ord. 65 51.2(37), 1979). j14.08.370 Wall sign. "pall sign" moans a sign attached p to or erected against the wall of a building or structure with the exposed face of the sign parallel to the plane of such wall. (Ord. 65 51.2(35), 1y79). 14.08.380 Window sign. "Window sign" means a sign painted, attached, glued, or otherwise affixed to a window, or otherwise easily visible from the exterior o' the building. (Ord. 6S 51.2(36), 1979). Chapter 14.12 ADMINISTRATION Sections: 14.12.010 Sign permit required. 14.12.020 Method of application 14 12.030 Method of review. .4.12.040 City planner. 1: 12 050 Interpretation of provisions. 14 12.Oo0 Variances. 14.12 070 Appeal. 14.12.010 Sian permit required. A sign permit shall be required prior to the placing, erecting, moving, or recon- strv. -tang of any sign in the city, unless expressly exempted by this title. Signs requiring a permit shall comply with the provisions of this title and all other applicable laws and ordinances (Ord. 65 -8 515, 1983: Ord 65 52.0, 1979). 14 .12.020 Method of application. An application for a permit s a. be ma a on forme as prescribed by the city planner. Such an application shall be filed with the plan- ning division. The application shall be accompanied by any fees or bonds as specified by city council resolution. (Ord 65 -8 516, 1983: Ord 65 52.1, 1979). 14 12.030 Method of review. The purpose of a permit is to help ensure compl ance with the provisions of this title .after receipt of a sign application, the city planner (Rancho Cucamonga 12/83) 110 397 14.12 040 - -14 12.070 or a designated representative shall render a decision to approve, approve with modlficatione, or deny the sign request within fifteen working days. Such a review shall ensure that any sign proposal is in conformanco with this title and is consistent with its intent and purpose. (Ord. } 65 -8 517, 1983s Ord. 65 52.2, 1979). 14.12.040 Cit fanner. It is the duty of the city planner to enforce a 1 provislons of this title The city planner has the authority under this title to designate a representativa of the department to implement the provisions of this title Further, the city planner has the option of referring any sign request to the planning commission for their review and approval (Ord. 55 -B 518, 1983: Ord 65 53.0, 1979) 14 12.050 Inter rotation of provisions. A. The pro- visions o tF,' tt t ei i— are not intcRde to a rogate any ease- ments, covenant %,, or other existing agreements which are more restrictive than the provisions of this title. B. Whenever the application of this title is uncertain the question shall be referred to the planning commissLoi for determination. The planning commission shall then authorize signing 'rhich best fulfills the intent of this title C If any section, subsection, eRntence, clause, phrase, or portion of this title is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of proper jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion3 hereof (Ord. 65 -8 519, 1983; Ord. 65 53.11 1979). 14.12.060 Variances. Applications for R variance from the terms e t tle shall be reviewed by the planning commission according to the variance procedures as set forth in the zoning ordinance. (Ord 65 53 2, 1979) :4.12.070 Atpeal. h decision of the city pinnner may be appealed wl n ten days of the decision to the planning commission. The appeal shall be made on the forms prescribed by the division of community development and fees paid in accordance with the fee resolution. The submission of the application and fees shall constitute the filing of the appeal The planning commission shall review the appeal at a regularly scheduled meeting according to the schedule of meetings and deadlines for submission of applications The commission shall either uphold, reverse, or modify the :icy planner's decision. If anyone is aggrieved or affected by the decision of the planning commission, then they may appeal 171 (Rancho Cucamonga 11,83) 399 14 16 010 the decision to the city council within ten days from the decision of the planning commission. The appeal shall be submitted in accordance with the above appeal provisions. The city council shall review the appeal and either uphold reverse, or mctify the commission decision. (Ord. 65 -B 520, 1983: Ord. 65 53.3, 1979). Sections: 14.16.010 14.16.020 14.16.021 14.16.030 14.16.040 14 16.050 14.16.060 Chapter 14.16 GENERAL PROVISIONS Exempt signs Prohibited signs. Roof signs. Signa relating to inoperative activities. Enforcement, penalties and abatement. Construction and maintenance of signs U30 of flags. 14.16.010 Exempt si en, The following signs shall be exempt ram t e app cat an, permit, and fee requirements of this title. An electrical or building permit may, however, be required: A. Permanent window signs not exceeding four square feet and limited to business identification, ;ours of opera- tion, address and emergency information only; B. Real estate sighs for residential ssles not exceeding four square feet in area or five feet in height, provided it is unlit and is removed within fifteen days :.fter the close of escrow or the rental or leese has been accomplished; C. Contractor of construction signs: One directory sign shall be permitted on the construction site for all contractors (may include bark, realtors, subcontractors, etc ) not exceeding thirty -two square feet unless legally required by government contracts to be larger No sign shall exceed eight feet in overall height and shall be located no less than ten feet from any property line. Such sign shall be removed upon the completion of the project; D. Future tenant identification sign: Future tenant identification signs may be placed on vacant cr developing property to advertise the future use of the property and where this information may be obtained. Such sign shall be limited to one per street frontage and to a maximum of thirty - two square feet in area and eight feet in overall height fcr parcels containing ten acres or less For parcels greater than ten ac-,,, one sign is permitted for every six hundred feet of stre.t frontage and is limited to sixty -four square (Rancho Cucamonga 12183) 172 399 14.16.010 173 (Rancho Cucamonga 12183) •/00 Q Peet in area per aide and fifteen feet in overall height. 4 Such signs may also be placed Along the freeway at one �- tho.;eand Coot intervals net to ex•:eed one hundred fifty square feet in area per side and twenty feet in overall o height. Further, such signs shall be placed no less than r ten feet from any property line. Any such sign shall be rAmoved upon completion of such project; E Real estate signs for sale of industrial or commer- cial property; One sign per street frontage not to exceed r ` thirty -two square feet in area to advertise the sale, lance, or rent of such property. No such Sign shall exceed eight feet in overall height and shall not be located cl'ser than ten feet from any property line. Where a property has in excess of six hundred lineal feet of frontage, an additional sign for every six hundred lineal feet is allowed; P. interior signs within a structure not visible frcra offsite or from outside of building; O, tfemorial tablets, plaques, or directional signs for }• community historical resources, installed by a recognized • historical society or civic organization; H. Convenience signs not exceeding three square feet ` in area; 1. Residential building identification signs used to identify individual residences and not exceeding two square feet; J. Official and legal notices issued by the court, public body, person, or officer in performance of his public duty or in giving >ny legal notice; K. Directio,al, warning, identification, or informs - tional•signs or structures required or authorized by Law or by federal, state, county, or city authority; L. Official flags of the United States of America, the state of California, and other states of the United States, counties, municipalities and official flags for nations, and flags of internationally, and nationally recognized organiza- tions; M. Signs of publio utility companies, indicating danger or which serve as an aid to public safety or which show location of undereround facilities or public telephones; N. Safety signs on construction sites; 0 Time and temperature signs that convey time and temperature only and not exceeding twelve square feet nor eight feet in height. P Political signs having to do with any Lssua, ballot measure, or candidate in any municipal, state or federal election or political statements and expressions shall be permitted in any zoning district subject to the following provisions and any other applicable provisions within this title: 173 (Rancho Cucamonga 12183) •/00 Q 14.16.020 1. Any person, party or group posting political r signs in the city shall abide by the provisions set forth in this titles 2. All political signs shall be placed no earlier than thirty days prior to the election and shall be removed not later than ten days following the date of the election; 3. A political sign shall not exceed thirty -two square feet in total area for one aide. No signs shall be placed in a manner that would obstruct visibility of pedestrian or vehicle traffic; 4. All political signs shall not exceed an overall height of eight feet from the finished grade. Signs used for identification of political headquarters shall comply with the provisions of this title; S. The placement of any sign, whether on public or private property, shall not cause public safety or health hazards; 6. No political sign shall be placed or fixed to a tree, fence, or utility pole, and shall not be posted on any public property or in the public right -of -way without issuance of an encroachment permit by the city engineer division; 7. No political sign shall be posted in violation of any provisions of this title. Furthe the city planner or his designee shall have the right to remove all signs placed contrary to the provisions of this section. (Ord. 65 -B �h"I'�Ja,�O1 5521 - -24� 19/83; Ord 6 54.0, 197�/ /O�i fo"'". 14.36.020' Prohibited si na. A11 signs n tb expressly �,yG permitte are pro b to nc u ing but not limited to the C� following: A. Boot signs, except as provided for in this titles q�� 4Q_ B Flashing signs, except in time and temperature signs; *41 C Animated signs; fYt 0 Revolving signs; CL. E Vehicle signs; F. Portable signs, except where permittud in this title; G. Off -site signs, except temporary subdivision direc- tional signs as provided for in this title; H Signs on the public right -of -way, except where required by a governmental agency; I Signs blocking doors or fire escapes; J. Light bulb strings and exposed tubing, except for temporary uses such as Christman tree lots; K Banners, flags, pennants and balloons, exc•ipt for special events as provided for in this title; L Advertising structures, except as otherwise permitted in this title (Ord. 65 -8 $25, 1983: Ora. 65 54.1, 1979). (Rancho Cucamonga 12/83) 114 yc/ 14.16 021 -- 14.16.040 ' 14_16.021 Roof signs. Foof signs may be used only in '( the event do o er a gninq alternatives are ae,iilable. Roof signs may be permitted if architecturally designed and built into the roof structure. Such design shall be compatible in design and materials with the building (Ord 65 -B 526, 19831. 14.16.030 Si s rolatin to !no arative activities. Signs per�nnq to act vit ee or usineases w .i are no longer in aperation, shall be removed from the premises or the sign copy shall be removed ur obliterated within sixty days after the premises has been vacated. Any such sign'not removed within the epee -fied time shall constitute a nuisance and shall be subject to removal under the provisions of this title. (Ord. 65 54.2, 1979). 14.16.040 Enforcement•, oenalties and abatement, A. Any violation o e provis one of this section shall be doomed to be a continuing violation until the violation has been corrected B. Any person violating any of the orovisiona of this section shall he guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punish- able by fine of not more than five hundx ^_4 dollgrs or by imprisonment in the county jail fcr not amore than six months or by both such fine and imprisonment. C. Notwithstanding any other proviiion of th l.s section, the city attorney upon the order of the tit council, may commence an action in a court of competent - urisdiction to obtain an injunction prohibiting the construction, erection, maintenance or display, or requiring -he removal, of any sign which is in violation of an} of the provisions of this section In any such action, the city shall be entitled to recover its costs and its reasonable attorney's fees D The owner or other person entitled to possession of a sign whin, is removed, stored and /or destroyed )pursuant to any provision Of this section shall be liable to the city for the cost of the reno-al, storage and /or destruction anc the city may recover the same through an action commenced :n a court of competent jurisdiction together with the city's court costs and reasonable attorney's fees. E. Any illegal sign within the public right -of -way 's found and declared to be a public nuisance, and such sign ngy be abated by the city as follows: 1 If the address of the owner or other person entitled to possession of the sign is known, notice of tic city's intention to remove and destroy the sign, stating the date after which sign will be removed and destroyed, sh:,11 b ma:,ed to the owner or other person entitled to pDesession by certified mail, return receipt requested at least ten dayo before the date If the address of the owrer or other person entitled to possession is not known, the notice shall be 175 (Rancho Cucamonga 12/93) yoz 14 16.040 affixed in a conspicuous place on said sign at least ten days before the date. The notice shall also set forth the pro- visions of this section- 2 The before person in Possession henotice, of the sign may, The written hearing d the s planning division. to possession and set forth in detail thercontentionsiwhyd the sign 3. if a request ford hearings Is filed, the planning commission shall hear the matter at a regularly scheduled meeting held not .,-re than thirty days thereafter. After _ the hearing, the pl%nninc commission shall docarmine whether or not the sign is an illegal sign w thin the p right- The The •tritten decision of the platy .ng cosamise. •n shall be rendered within ten days after the heai.rq and a copy of the decision shall be mailed to the owner or other person entitled to of appeals seven in subdivision dlofs the this subsection, days afteromailinhe planning commission shall become 4 The owner or other person entitled to possession may file a notice of appeal with the city clerk within ten days after the date of mailing of the planning commission's decision If a tinely notice of appeal is filed, the matter shall be heard by the city council at a regular meeting scheduled not more than thirty days thereafter. After hearing, the city council shall deterwhetho v erornot the sign written an illegal sign within the public decision o` the city council shall be rendered within ten days after the hearing and a copy of the decision shall be mailed to within seven edays e thereafter peThe ndecision of the possession City council shall become final ten days after mailing 5 Unless the owner of other person entitled to possession of the sisn, on or before the removal date stated in the notice described in this section, files a written request for hearing with the planning department, the city may, at any time after said date, remove and destroy the sign if a written request for hearing is filed :hen upon any final decision of the planning commission or the city cour-il determining chat the sign is en illegal sign within the public right -of -way, the city may remove and destroy the sign 6 voewithatand ing any provision of this section to the cont:h•y, any illegal sign within the public right - of -way whi.h .onstitutes a hazara to pedestrian or vehicular traffic may be removed immediately and stored by the city, at tha expense of the owner or other person entitled to and hearing possession, rocedures seta forth c in p this o sections n(Ordic65ieh527, 1183: Ord 65 54.3, 1979) (Rancho Cucamonga 12/83) 176 yo3 ^n- 14.16.050 -- 14.16.060_ i 14.16.050 Construction and maintenance of si ha. A. ,. Every a qn an a parts, port ens, an materials shall. be manufactured, assembled, and erected in compliance with all applicable state, federal and city regulations and the Uniform Building Code. B. Every sign and all parts, portions, and materials shall be maintained and kept in proper repair. The display surface of all signs shall be kept clean, neatly painted and free from rust and corrosion. Any cracked, broken surfaces, malfunctioning lights, missing sign copy or other unmaintained or damaged portion of a sign will be repaired or replaced within thirty days following notification by the city. Non- compliance with such a request will constitute a zoning violation and will be enforced as such. (Ord. 65 54.4, 1979). 14.16.060 Use of flags. The use of flags is permitted in conjunct log an approved residential subdivision sales office or a commercial office, or an industrial leasing office. The use of such flags shall conform to the following'provisions: A. A maximum of six may be used. B. The flags shall be no higher than fifteen feet:'— C. The flags shall be displayed in the immediate vicinity of the sales /leasing office. In no case shall the flagn be allowed within the public right -af -way D. In the case of a residential subdivision office, the :lags can be maintained as long as a valid operating permit for the sales office has been granted. E. In the case of a commercial office, or i:dustrial leasing office, the flags may be maintained until sevens/ - five percent of the spaces have been leased F. The maximum size of the flag shall not exceed three feet by five feet and shall be maintained in good condition Torn or worn flags shall be replaced. (Ord 65 -8 528, 19P3). Sections 14 20 010 14.20 020 14.20.040 14 20 041 14 20 050 14 20 060 14.20 070 14 20 060 Chapter 14.20 SIGN REGULATIONS Permitted signs -- Generally, Convenience signs. Special evert signs. Promotional sales signs. Permitted signs - -On -site subdivision signs Permitted signs- Off -site subdivision directional sign. Permitted signs -- Agricultural uses. Permitted signs -- Residential uses 177 (Rancho Cucamonga 12/83) J/D V 14.20.010 -- 14.20.040 Sections: (Continued) 14.20.100 Permitted signs -- Commercial and office uses. 14.20.110 Permitted signs -- Industrial uses. 14.20.010 Permitted ei ::s-- Generall Sign permits may to issued or a gna inc ude vn ar thIs section provided the signs are in compliance to all other applicable laws and ordinances. (Ord. 65 Ar v(pa t), 1979). —� I✓� �xo l nlnnc ,,,s, lG Ill to�wr��`S*�a � 7Y 14.2O.U20 Cor_van into sl ns. The f to ing signs may be permitted n any zoning d str ct subject to the provisions listad: ,1 On-sit-,w signs which are necessary for public con - venierce or safety but which are not exempt, may be approved by the city planner or his designee. B. Signs containing information such as "entrance," "exit,' or directional arrows shall be desig;.ed to be viewed from on -sits or from an area adjacent to the site by pedestrians or motorists while parking their automobile. C Signs that convey advertising, or products, shall not be cone:dered a convenience sign. D. Any such sign shall not be allowed within the public right -of -way E Such signs shall not exceed four square rest in area, per side. In the case of a ground sign, the overell height shall not exceed four feet. (Ord. 65 -8 529, 1983: Ord. 61 55 0(1), 1979). 14.20.040 5 ecial event signs. Special event 91.9ns may be approve or a .m to period o time in any zonlr diutrict as a means of Eablicizinq special events such as grand ope „- ing, carnivals, festivals, charitable events, Christmas tree lots, and fireworks stands To apply for approval of special event signs, the applicant shall submit s letter to the city planner which describes the pioposed sign by means of a sketch and the display dates. The city planner shall review the request within fifteen working days after receipt and shall make a determination to approve, appro•:e with modifica- tion or deny the req:tect. Such special event signs shall be limited to the following provisions: A No more than one special evert sign shall be permitted per activity and shall be either a wall, window or ground sign, and use of flags, banners and pennants e All special event signs shall be a maximum of fifty square feet and shall be pobted below the roof or shall be no higher than eight feet in the case cf a ground sign. C Special event signs shall be limited to forty -five days per calendar year (Ord. 65 -B 531, 1983: Ord. 56 55 0(3), 1979) (Rancho Cucamonga 12/93) 178 4105 i i, t` 1 14.20 041- -14.20 050 14.10.041 Promotional sales signs. A promotional sales sign may be approve or a temporary period of time, as cpaci- fied in this section, for commercial and industrial uses. The signs may be used to promote the sale of new products, new management, new hours of operation, a new service, or to promote a special sale. Any business desiring to use a promotional sales sign must file an application and dra-ing or photograph with the city planning division for review and approval. The use of such siqns is subject to the followinq limitations: A Ho more than one sign &hall be permitted per activity or business. S. The signs shall be temporary signs designed either do a wall sign, window sign or ground sign. The sign can be in the form of a banner or pennant. C The sign shall not exceed fifty square feet and shall be posted below the roof. In the case of a ground sign, the height of the sign shall not exceed eight feet. D Pronoclonal sale signs shall be limited to a display period not to exceed fifteen days Four such periods shall be permitted for each calendar year, not to exceed a total of sixty days per year. Two periods may be combined for thirty consecutive days. (Ord. 65 -B 532, 1983). 14.20.050 eP ted n rs - o-Un -a ito eubdivinion signs. The fu ow ng s g we in any zoning district subject to the provisions listed: A. One temporary on -site subaivision sigr not to exceed sixty -four square feet total for two sides or thirty -two square feet for one side and a total overall height of fifteen feet may be permitted on each smin street frontage of the property being subdivided not to exceed two such signs for all Phases of any subdivision (interior streets of the subdivision are not recognized as main street frontage). B. Such sign shall be for the indentVication of a subdivision, price information and the developer's name, address, and telephone number. C Such signs shall be removed within ten days from the date of the final sale of the land and /or rosidences or within Twelve months, whichever comes first. Extensions of the twelve -month time limit can be approved by the director of commun ty development in cases of hardship. 0 Signs shall be maintained in good repair at all times E. A cash deposit of five hundred dollars per sign shall be deposited with the sign application to ensure con - plirnce with the title and removal of such sign. The deposit shall be refunded to the applicant upon sign removal by the applicant if the ci•y is forced to remove any signs, then the cost of removal shall be deducted from the deposit. (Ord 65 55 0(4), 1979). 179 (Rancho Cucamonga 12/83) Vo 4 'C 14.20.060 14.20.060 Permitted si s - -Cff -site subdivision direc- t tionaI s T e o� cw ng a gas may a permitted n— n any — zon-ng strict subject to the provisions listedt A. A maximum of six signs may be used to lead customers to the site. B. Signs shall be no larger than sixty inches by nine inches and shall be grouped on a four -sided sign stricture as shown in Exhibit A. Such structure shall contain no more than a n tract identifications. C A sign structure shall be located not less than six hundred _feet fr�i an existing or previously approved sign site. Further, each sign may only contain the name of the subdivision, and a directional arrow as shown on Exhibit B. D. The placement of each sign structure shall be reviewed and approved by the city planner. E. Signs placed on private proeprty shall be done with written consent of the property owner and filed with the department of community development prior to issuance of permit. Signs in the public right -of -way sha., be re- viewed and approved by the city engineer prior to issuance of the sign permit. F. A sign location plan shall be prepared showing the site of each directional sign and shall be submitted to the department of caitunity development prior to the issuance of sign permit G. Any such sign approved for a particular subdivision within the city shall not be changed to advertise another subdivision without prior approval of the city planner. H There shall be no additions, tag signs, streamers, devices, display boards, or aptJurtenances added to the sign as originally approved. Further, no other directional signing may lie used such as posters, or trailer signs I All nonconforming subdivision directional signs associated with the subdivaeior, in question must be removed prix• to the issuance of a new sign permit J A five- hundred- dollar cash deposit shall be placed with the city to ensure compliance with this title Any sr,gn placed contrary to the provisions of this title may be removed by the city and the cost of removal shall be deducted from the deposit. Additional costs incurred by the city resulting from the removal of illegal signs shall be charged to the developer X The sign shall be allowed until subdivision is sold out L The off -mite subdivision sign nrcgram may be im- plemented and installed through the Building Industry Associa- tion (BIA) if an agreement is approved for the regulation and control between the city and the BIA. If such a program is implemented, all off -site subdivision signs shall be (Rancho Cucamonga 12163) 180 11012 y . Y ' 14.20 060•' regulated and installed per the agreement and approvals be- , tween the BIA and the city. The BIA shall not install any ' new structures without express written. consent of the city n planner. EXHIBIT A GXHI °•: ° S- A )OW RUN lord 65 -B 533, 1983: Ord 65 55 00), 1979). 181 (Ranco Cucamonga 12i83) r' J YO 8 f 14.2C.070 llstedt n .. c n Y V (Ord. 65 -8 534, 1983: Ord. 65 55.1, 1979) (Rancho Cucamonga 12/83) 182 V09 PK The zones r �V• U Y Y tl 'M \q0 y u e 8 c Z g u q o tl a o m GYl m W W q q G yCq C PWP • \ Y W Y W tl Y �•• 8•y e 4 � •4 4 e0 Y G 7 Q 4 w tl 4 P b 0� SS q d J Y Y Y V m W 4 < q 'J O N N N ry 4 Y y q • q P O yw y¢ yY yy .O C J yr y y0 ypC I , n .. c n Y V (Ord. 65 -8 534, 1983: Ord. 65 55.1, 1979) (Rancho Cucamonga 12/83) 182 V09 PK The zones sss�, ,y.r _, _ i k •Y / e c /�, ivy 10.70.080 " 14.20.080 Pern,itted ei na-- Reaiden a-e—nt e4 The follow ng a qns may be po tte rea ent a .u.se► subject to the provisions listed: k fined ford 65 -B 535, 1983: Ord. 65 55 2, 1979). 183 (Rancho cucamOn.ln 12/83) yip 0 �� I i! L� ES•,� °= ,� F �� Fii �� r Ia �! r ie All ;; a' Ri :1 i li 3: iii ill p- I till i's I i di d5 i i I Pit I 1 1i I ford 65 -B 535, 1983: Ord. 65 55 2, 1979). 183 (Rancho cucamOn.ln 12/83) yip 0 14.10.100 The following signs may be permitted command office Zon, west subiect to the Provisions Lis td:' (Ord 65 -B 537, 1983: Ord 65 55 4. 1979) (Rancho Cucamonga 12/83) 184 y// 1`, ■ Y 9 14.20.110 Vomit lowing signs may be pc the provisions listede I jilt 3,jt IN fil �1 if rat ill islif I �i !t I 111 Iii i 11 if lid te�d e�lgn�a -- Industrial -401 rmitted f ind=trial xu 4 till. I.itiQ ! i is J-Ii, ;; fit l I ;ilk, j ;! =� 0 is? all.-al .iii. 3 �i tl ill I I rat j1l I I ai t t9s = Is Is rl in ,aI L• !i t1 ,r I,l Ill x I ldl � 1 ii It I 14.20.110 ^1. The fol- As subject to (Ord 65 -C cl, 1984: Ord 65 -8 X38, 1983: Ord. 65 55.5, !9 -9) Lll �— 85 (Rancnc Cucamonga 7/84) 14.24.010 -- 14.24.040 Chapter 14.24_ DESIGN STANDARDS e 14.2 Seeti 14.24.010 Generally. 14.24.020 Architectural style. 14.24.030 Relationship to buildings. (/ 14.24.040 Relationship to other signs. 14.24.050 Sign dimensions. 14 24.060 Landscaping. 14.24.070 Illumination e,d motion. 14.24.080 Sign copy. 14.24.010 Generally. The design standards set forth in this cnapter shall be adhered to for all signing. (Ord. 65 Art. VI(part), 1979). 14.24.020 Architectural style. That each sign is do- signed with the intent and purposo to relate to the archi- tectural style of the main building or buildings upon the site, and to the extent not inconsistent with such style, that the sign will be compatible with the style or character of existing improvements upon lots adjacent to the site. SiCns located on commercial sites but in a predominately residential area, shall consider compatibility with such residential area (Ord. 65 56.0, 197x). 14.24.030 Relationshi to budln s. Signs totaled upon a of with only one ma n ;U11 il ng ousing the enter- prise which the sign identifies, shall be designed to in- corporate at least one of the predominantly visual elements of such building, such as type of construction materials, color, or other design detail. Each sign located upon a lot with more than one main building, such as a shopping center or other commercial or industrial area developed in accord- ance with a common deve opment plan, shall be designed to incorporate at least one of such predominantly visual design elements cot *on or similar to all such buildings or the buildings oc..upied by the 'main tenants' or principal enter- prises. The community development director may condition its approval of a sign to require more than one such visual element to be incorporated into the design of the sign where such element or elements is necessary to achieve a signifi- zant visual relationship between the sign and building or buildings (Ord 65 56 1, 1975). 14 24.040 Relationshl to ocher si its where there is more than one monument sign oca ee upon a lot, all such (Rancho Cucamonga 7/84) 186 V13 14.24.040 '< i h r• signc shall have designs which are well relatsd to each othe c• by the siailnr treatment or incorporation of not lees , the- tour of the following six design elementse tt•� Y r1 t. J �i 185a (Rancho Cucamonga 1/841 - y/y 14.24.050 -- 14.24.000 A. Type of construction materials as used in the several sign components (such as cabinet, sign copy, supports); B. Latter style of sign copy, C. Illumination; uprights or O. Type or method used for suppo rts, 9 structure on which sign is supported; cabin F. Shape 02 entire sign and its several components. (Ord. 65 56.2, 1979). 14.24.090 Sign dimensions. The dimensions of the sign cabinet; iii any, oc otTier CM ,I of the dimensions nd of the visually - ibalanced withctheistzehofltha proportional uilding na a (Ord. 6S 56.3, 1979). 14.24.060 Landsca in . Each monument sign shall We locate in a p aiMt-e7-Ta—wdscaped area which is of a shape, design and size-(aqua) to at leant the r;gn area) that will provide a compatible sattLng and ground definLtion to the sign. The planted landscaped area shall be maintained on a roasonable and regular basis. (Ord. 65 56.4, 1979). am47lna motion. � hall be noovngaarst n all COmpcnents) and illumination, if any, shall be maintained by artificial light which sshy . d ca(Ord.�t65n56,5,n1979). color at all times ( nonflaia 14 .24.080 Sign_co . Sign copy shall include minimal lnforma- tlon On y. T e use of subordinate information such as telephone numbers, lists of products, pictures of products, etc. are discouraged. The name of the use or business shall be the dominant message on the sign. 'Ord. 65 1979). Chapter 14.28 Sections: 14.28 010 14.28.020 14.28.030 14 28 040 14 28.050 14 20 060 NONCONFORMING SIGNS Intent of provisions General requirements. Amortizatic, requirements Historical c..3ns. Hardship cases. Removal and relocation of advertising structures. 415 106 -1 (Rancho Cucamonga 12/831 14.28 010 -- 14.28.030 14.28.O1U Intent of provisions. It is the intent of this c apter to recogn ze g2 this the eventuel elimination of existing signs that are not in conformity with the provisions of this title, is an important as in the prohibition oZ new signs that would violate these regulations. (Ord. 65 57.0, 1979). 14.28.020 General requirements. A. A nonconforming stgn may not be: 1. Changed to another nonconforming sign: 2. Structurally altered to extend its useful life: 3 Expanded! 4. Reestablished after a business discontinued for sixty days; 5. Reestablished after damage or destruction of more than fifty percent of its value, as determined by the building official. B. No now sign shall be approved for a site, structure, building or use that contains nonconforming signs unlosa such nonconforming signs are removed or modified to conform with the provisions of this title. C. No building permit shall be issued for any structures, building expansions or new building construction on a site which contains nonconforming signs, unless all signs an the site are brougnt into conformance with this title. This does not include interior alterations which do not, substantially change the character or intensity of the site. (Ord. 65 -8 539, 1983: Ord. 65 57 1, 1979). 14.28.030 Amortization requirements. A. Eve3y sign or advertising structure w rch doess no ,Fomply with the provisions of this title shall be amortized in accordance with the following schedule: Value Time Period Signs under $250 180 days $250- -5500 1 -1/2 year $500 -- 51,000 2 years Over $1.000 5 years 0 The value of a nonconforming sign shall be determined by the building official in accordance with the latest material valuation schedules. C. Time periods for amortization of nonconforming signs shall begin from the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title Any sign which becomes nonconforming either by reason of amendment to this title or by annexation to the city, shall also be subject to the provisions of this title. The period of time within which such sign must be abated snall commence upon the effective date of such amendment or annexation. (Ord 65 57 2, 1919). (Rancho Cucamonga 12183) 186 -2 Y/G 14 28.040 -- 14.28.050 ' 14.28.040 Historical st nos. Signs which have historical signs canoe to commun ty ut do not conform to the provisions of this title may be allowed to remain provided that the planning commission makes the following findings3 A. The sign has historical significance for the commun- e ity. B. The sign does not create nor cause a traffic hazard. C. The sign does not create a visual nuisance to the character of the community. i- D. The sign is properly maintained and structurally >` sound. E. The sign does not adversely affoct adjacent proper- 'A ties. (Ord. 65 57.3, 1979). 14.28.050 Hardship cases. A. Under cases of extreme ., hardy p and unusue circumstances, the planning commission r shall have the authority to allow the retention of a non- conforming sign if the commission specifically finds that extreme hardship and unusual circumstance" dxiot. B. The proponent of the request, shall ha-e the burden of clearly demonstrating that an extreme hardship and unusual circumstance does exist and warrants the retention of the sign The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing. The procedures for conducting the public hearing and application fees shall be regulated by the variance procedures and fees established by the zoning ordinance C The planning commission shall use the following findings for determining that an extreme and unusual circum- stance exists: 1. The site has a unique character or features that causes visibility problems. 2. The sign does not create a traffic hazard. 3. The sign does not create a visual blight to the community 4. The sign does not adversely affert adjacent properties. sound 5. The sign is properly maintained and structurally 6 No other signing alternative or design would be feasible or be able to provide reasonable signing in accord- ance with this title. D It the planning commission finds that an extreme and unusual circumstance exists, but that the design or condition of the sign creates a visual blight, then the commission can grant a relief from the amortization of the noncon£oming sign with the condition that the sign be remodeled to a more aesthetic design If a business or shop- ping center, found to have the above hardship and which con- tains nonconforming signs, is remodeled, then the cossnission shall have the authority to request that the nonconforming 186 -3 (Rancho Cucamonga 12183) '-//7 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA r. STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 1988 ci T0: City Council and City Manager I FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer i SUBJECT: Review of staffs denial of application, for permit to construct drive approach on the southside of Hillside Road, I west of Morning Canyon Way, Blakely Residence, 5514 Morning Canyon Way. It is receomended that City Council not approve a drive approach for vehicular ingress and egress on the south side of Hillside Road, west of Morning Canyon Way, adjacent to 5514 Morning canyon Way. Background /Analysis The homeowner located at 5514 Morning Canyon Way submitted to Is Engineering Division an application for a construction peralt construct a drive approach on the south side of Aillside Road ,lust west of Morning Canyon Way. 4fter raview of the application by staff, It was determined that the proposed aprroach would be too close to the intersection and there is an exist•, approach located on the south side of Hillside Road at the rear lot line of the subject property The homeowner, to anticipation of obtaining a permit, constructed an on- site driveway that encroaches on Hillside Road right -of -way. The homeowner has been directed by staff to remove the existing driveway from the Hillside public right -of -way. The property owner contends that prior verbal approval was given by strff Staff members that would have reviewed the proposed drive approach with the applicant, do rot recall any prior approval. Monte Prescher contacted Mrs. Blakely in December when it was first noticed that a concrete slab had been constructed in the Hillside Right- of-way. Mrs. Blakely was advised that an approach at that location may not be possible, also, that non - vehicular access may be indicated on the recorded Tract man. She advised that the City Enginetr, during the Council meeting regarding the block wall, had given verbal approval. y/8 r City Council Staff Report Blakely Residence February 17, 1988 Page 2 After some resrarch Mrs. Blakely was told that a drive approach at that ` leca.1on would not be possible, even though access is r.ot restricted on the Tract Map and that the City Engineer did not give prior approval. the application was then received and denied. Mr. Blakely contacted the A City Engineer and Indicated that during discussion to August, 1987 at the counter regarding the block - ,wall. Monte Prescher had verbally, approved - the proposed approach. Although Monte Prescher does not recall giving verbal approval, it 1s possible that the approach may Have been discussed. However, the applicant would have been advised to submit an application prior to commencing with any work. Tha driveway located within the Hillside Road right -of -way was constructed without_a permit. The property owner should have obtained a permit prior to constructing Improvements to the right -of -way. See attached letter advising the property owner that an approach at the proposes location cannot be aoproved. Respectful!.I!y submitted, t •G RHN: Attachments yi9 tr !ATA . CITY OF RANCHO CEiCAMONOA January 21, 1988 Mr. Carl E. Blakely 5514 Morning Canyon Way Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Mr. Blakely: ran tva> a,. nr, t4a3ea a3..w� ww+. 1D),l. mo rn.tui This letter is in regard to your application of JL.ivary 12, 1988, for a nermit to construct a drive approach on Hillside Road west of Horning Canyon Way. After reviewing the application, a visual inspection was performed at the site. It has been determined that the application cannot be approved for the follnwing reasons: 1. The proposed drive approach is too close to the intersection of a collector street (Hillside Road). 2. There is existing rear yard access and a drive approach west of the proposed drive approach. In addition, the existing cn-site concrete slab encroaches upon City right -of -way. The City right -of -way at that area on Hillside Road is thirteen feet from the face of the curb. That portion of concrete slab or 4riveway will have to be removed `ram the right -of -way within tw^ weeks from receipt of this letter. Understand that if any verbal approvals are given, they are tentative until the application is received and a proper review and investigation of the proposed improvement can be conducted. Your application was reviewed by the City Engineer, the Public Works Engineer and other staff members to determine if any tentative approval had been given. To their knowledge, no tentative approval was given. Cordially, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Monte Prescher Public Works Engineer ev�e�ltland Public Works Inspector SMG:sd v... Dc9 h N Brown C..' hanr Kwt o, warn. Gr+nL 5� ChaA„1 kq,,%it Pam J Wntht Lan,.M Wamman Pat & Carl Blakely 5514 Morning Canyon Way Alta Loma, Ca. 91701 Lot 27, Tract 10047 To Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager, Rancho Cucamonga (Ref Jan 21, 1988 memo. Drive Approach, H11Islo! Road) xc City Clerk Sir, / Again we are reouesting to appear before the Rancho Cuc- &nonga City Council This time to seak a variance to construct . driveway approach on Hillside road 38' West of Morning Canyon Way. A concrete driveway is already in place After our last problem with obtaining approval for our wall facing Hillside we made sure we reviewed the desired drive access with Monte Prescher On Sept. I5, 1987, my husband and Toni Sanders (our builder) asked Monte Prescher about the Hillside driveway approach and tae City Property conflict After about thirty-five (35) minutes of exam -ning large blue prints and plot maps, Mr Prescher assured the two t -at we had no problem 'n obtaining a permit With this ,rrornat-or we proceeded to nave our builder construct the driveway to Hi "side with the thought (also from Monte) that the final driveway access approval could be obtained when the driveway was completed Wher, we took a drawing of the proprosed access down to City Offices ror final approval, our reques• - as denied Since then we have also received a letter, dated Jan 1988, from the City Engineering Division that 3a!d that the concrete slab Du!it to facilitate Hillside access. has to be removed W'tr in tw^ weeks' A ;a'^ we have had a - err!b'e broD'e'n w'tr co— ,urcat'o -$ wi'h ,,e C •y staff Please put us or the C'ty Courci agenda for the Geri 17tn — e., .. -.e 15 -k -�9,; 'lareiv s work ' 18 9 5 -9815 (HOreywe" ^c 5's,eiy s w ^-4 868 -3' °8 (5enera Dyn. --,cs) '/.2, 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATEt March 11, 1988 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM City Manager's Office SOBJEM Letter P.aaard1ns Telephone Directory Douixnation I J 'rl''�'t~e V Attached for your consideration in a draft letter for the Msyor's signature regardira the Nt7 /Community nua to he designated in future GTE Californin telephone diractorios. She letter indicates that residents any choose any one of the follwing City /Community ¢seen — Rnncbo Cucamonge. Alta Lome. Cucamonga or Etivanda — simply by returning or not ra.urniug a special ballot. The CLty Council is sexad to review the letter and sppruead it for the Mzyor'o signature and diatrioution. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this latter, plaaas foal free to contact Lauren Massetam or :ark Lorimar. /ml at tchaant W)DI Dear Residentt rho City of Rancho Cucamonga and GTE Cal lfcrnta are working cooperatively to Improve information provided in your telephone directory and we prod ya_r input regarding the '.fisting of your residential address trd telephone number in figure directories. Curretely, Ludt infrmation is 1 irtrd with your address and telophone nmbeer %long with one of tPe fcTlwing City /Community naeea — Randho Cucamonga, Ata Lana, Cucamonga Or E.tiwanda. , Most people traditionally search the directory for the City to which a resident 1 ivas. Such a ti A91 Ci'jr IIsti ng hcs not boon the use fir. Rancho Cu amorga and this has caLsed a certain amount of Confusion. At tn• sue time,, the City and GTE remCnize that it is Important to aary residents to have the choice of an individual eaamdnity identity or a City listing. To bsl:.oie these coneiderations, we bel tens that you should earefally neijA the options and mate your own chore. Encloses is a bailrt which allws each GTE custoaer to choose hi% future City /Community telephone directory 1!ating. As part of this ballet -prouss. GTE California will not charge for any changea made to the City /Communfity Dams you choose. To retain your current Meting, &imply indicate the name of the City/Community on the ballot and return it no Later than a. Ii you choose to be listed as Rancho Cucamonga, simply discard tho hailat and You will us listed iu future directories sith the Rancho Cucenongh designation. Such changes will first appear in the May 1989 GTE Directory. clanging the City /Community .lame will not affect your postal sarvice listing and is 1 invited only to the GTE directory. %Natevsr 1 isti ng you sela:t f;r tnw directory will not affect postal del tvsry since the US Postal Service rel tos on a specific zip code and not the aame of a City or Coaunity. The City of Rancho Cucamonga arm GTE Cal ifornis wish to thank you for malting your choice of directory designation. If you have question or cenceras regarding talephone directory listings, please contact a. Sincerely, Dennis L. Stout Mayor 1/.7 a h lw `fY Date: To: From: By: Subjects CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 7S, 1988 Mayor, Members of City Ctunuil, and City Manager Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant city Manager Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator Notice of Completion Heritage and Red Hill Community Parks Approval to accept aprovements, release of bonds and filing of Notice of Completion for the Neritago and Red Fill Community Park construction projects. The General Contractor, Shooter and Butte, Inc., has completed the remaining items on the final "Punch List" for the Heritage and Red Hill Community Parks. Commtneurate with this action, a Notice of Completion must be authorized by City Council and placed on file with tho County Recorders office within ten days of the City Council meeting and approval. Additionally, it is requested that the City Council authorize 1) The release of the Contract Bonds and accept issuance of maintenance and Guarantee Bond in a sum of 10* of the contract aneunt, 2) Authorize the final progress payment and, 3) Direct the City attorna}s office to review items 1 and 2 before action is taken. Respectfully submitted Robert A zzo Assistant City Manager RAn: -)L:bs L- - y.Z 3 r ri' • p N RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUN -I:, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON'GA, CALIFORNIA ACCE-':TING THE PUDL.I(. IMPROVEI4ENTS FOR TRZ IHPROVEMUT OF HERITAGE AND RFD HILL COMMUNITY PARR PROJECTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction if public improvements for the Heritage Community Park and Pad Hill Community Park. Projects has been completed to the satisfaction of tho Community Services Department: and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the work is hereby accepted and tha Community Services Department is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED the 16th day of HArch, 1988, AYES: ATTEST: NOES: ASSERT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor y2y Data: To: From: By: subject: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 16, 1988 J z r C U > 1477 � Mayor, members of the city council, and City Manager Historic Preservation Commission ,y Paula Pachon, Administrative Assistant Q P77CUM-11 W BEgghtMjuTLON: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends City Historic Landmark designation for the Night Blooming Cerous (Cereus Peruvians) located at 7850 Valle Vista Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. BACKGROD!!DL On November 17, 1987, an application wan filed by the owner of the property located at 7850 Valle Vista Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, Dr. and Mrs. Thomas Shoar, with the Community Services Department for consideration of the Night Blooming Ceroue located at the above referenced address for possible City Historic Landmark designation. An advertised Public Roaring wan held on December 3rd, 1987, to hear testimony and determine the merit of this item for possible recommendation of City Historic Landmark designation. in addition, at this meeting the Commission received a request from the owners to withdraw their application for consideration of this item for local landmark designation. As stated in the attached letter from Dr. and Mrs. Bhoar, the application for historic lardmark designation was originally initiated "...to keep from digging under the large Night Bloomirg Cereus present in the arer ... and to avoid filling the two inactive cesspools on their property." After being informed by the city inspectors that the City Code required that all inactive cesspools must be filled, the owners in their corre3pondenco to the Commission stated that "because of the present circumstances, we foal that declaring the cactus an historical landmark is not necessary as we as individuals plan on preserving this beautiful old plant." The Commission thnnkod Dr. and Mrs. sh -ar for their concern of the cactus but decided to deny t:7a withdrawal of their application for local landmark designation for the Night y ?-< Mayor, Members of the City council, and City Manger March 16, 1988 Page 2 Blooming Cereus based upon the Commission's strong belief that living features of the community, as well as structures, must be identified, preserved and safeguarded. In addition, it was noted that this particular variety of cactus was particularly large (1 1/2 stories high and 12 -15 feet in circumference) attesting to its relative age. Therefore, based upon review of the ownors application, the size and relative oge of the item and the photographs of the cactus the Commission voted to recommend City Historic Landmark designation for the Night Blooming Cereus. In addition, staff was directed to research this variety of cactus prior to taking this item to Council to augment the Information provided by the owners. To this end, staff has met with a variety of experts in the field of desert plants - the most recant being the Curator of the Desert Gardens at the Huntington Memorial Library. After viewing the photographs of the Night Blooming Cereus staff at the Library identified this particular cactus as a Cereus Pa:uvianus of approximately 50 -70 years of ago. This variety of cactus originated in Peru and is believed to be one of the earliest varieties of cactus brought to the United States. It is a crusted plant, meaning that the formation of its stem is pointed, and is sometimes referred to as 'monstrosua' in its form. It is a waxy cactus, hence the first part of its name, careus. It was also noted that this variety of cactus beers large tubular flowers during the summer months which appear in the evenings and oftentimes last until the early morning hours. Based upon the photographs of the Night Blooming Ceroux under consideration in our community for '.oval landmark designation the curator at the Huntington Memorial Library stated the he believes that it may well be one of the largest of its type in southern California. Based upon the information provided by the staff of the Desert Gardens at the Huntington Memorial Library, i.e., the Sze and relative age of the cactus, and the strong regard of the Commission to identify and safeguard not only structures of historic significance but also 'living" featk:es of our community the Historic Preservation Commission respectfully requests that City Historic Landmark designation be granted for the Night Blooming Cereus. cc: Historic Preservation Commission Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Larry Henderson, Genior Planner Dr. and Mrs. Thomas Shear ylG \ t 67 Y7 Y7 c Crry OF 1:ANCHO CUCAMONGA March 7, 1988 Dr. and Mrs. Thomas Shoar 7850 Valle Vista Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Dr. and Mrs. Shoar: I9r omv [m 90T. Ilsae C 917p. 111919R9.1nI On behalf of the Historic Preservation commission I am writing to inform you that the Commission is forwarding to city Council their recommendation for City Historic Landmark designation for the Hight Blooming Caicus located on your property. The city council will be considering this itam on Wednesday, March 16, 1968 at 7:30 p.m. at the Lions Park Community Center (9161 Base Linn Road, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730) under the consent calendar of their agenda. While it is not required, Council may remove any item from the consent calendar for discussion. should you wish, you may respond to the Historic Preservation Commission's recommendation either prior to the City Council meeting by written correspondence addressed to the Council or in parson the night of the meeting. Should you require further the Historic Prose +ation City Council's poosible contact me at 98: -1159. �sincerely, IQI.I_.�.hJ TA..i..it/✓�lU Paula Pachon Administrative Assistant Enclosure clarification of the implications of Commission's recommendation or the action, please do not hesitate to cc: Mayor and Members of the City Council Histu^ic Preservation Commission Lauran Wasserman, City Manager Robert Rims, Assistant City Mangor Brad Buller, City Planner Larry Henderson, Senior Planner y„ 0Dm9e N &owe l.K Welemai pmtl9L 79am OLM991 s1w91n y�g, P9m,191 wtyx J r' r ) ;T• City of Reecho Cucamonga Application for HISTORIC LUMMARK DESIGNATION HISTORIC POINT Or INTEREST DESIGNATION —'�LRletaric Landmark __Hintorlo Point of Iateraut IDENTITICATION I - Common Names .f/ /.LNT�L3[nen�at ��P <� e g. Historic None. It knount S. Street or Rural Addresss Zrm2 ✓wz,. Clt)t R Fhb .✓r7wm...lc.p zips 9/730 Uau't It .3pU_JtGN�0 Alweeeal•a parcel Nb. jue7nZ1510arfo Zoow$ Legal Descriptions f. Presest Owner. It kncvatCLiP.76 — eAddreess City: Zips Ovserabip lot public private B. Present DMS Original Oast i M Other past uses$ DESCRIPTION r g. Briefly describe the Dreseot ts s1*a1 s arazae of the site or structure and describe tae major alt4rations grog its original conditions_2We Q. 1 A/ eellWrl /kyamF fiE.eACf •` —< a .�..JC. Vs'ZX A- /Moan ST. ^ILLG �C Cs�JFe.t NF / F� � 6+ -•N •! �!cKl' T /J1 met) O -AAA Q. F . A�•tFZ4 Ion sketch sap fdras A label M' i �t LAp 71Vd S. ADproximats property sizes site and surrounding stroata. Lot Size (In feet) roadar and frcmloent laadmarks)s Trontmge Depth or approx. aereage IV o. Cooditlons (cbe*l(0 one) a. Excelleut—Z— b. Good__ Mwes lair__ d. Detertorsted= C. a y i "1 s. No longer to existence_ lei _+ 10. Is the features a. /lltsredf Q b. Oaalteredt (/ a s d S 11. Surroundlcges (check more than w - ome If **cavalry) At (�7c7US a. Cpaa lead r b. Resides tl*1 - ( c. Scattered bulldrings__ ' d. Densely built -up_ I �JYrlt [n�t <yCIaB.�s.rE .5 4.�9 12. Threats to Sites ` a. Bone know__ b. Private dovelopment__ o. Soo 10 ' d. public forks Project_ a. Vaodallen _ f. Otbsr� 12. Dates ot'sealosad photograph(s) Noes- /4I7 •� BOTRt The following (Items 1449) are for stmetures only. 4 u Ys 1t. Primary exterior building materials a. Sides_ b. Brick__ 9 "( c. Stucco__ d. Adobe_ a. Wood_ f. Other It '• the etruatu nt ■. On Its original aSUT b. Moved) c. Unknown} 18. Year of Ialtial Constmctiont Phis Date let a. ractual b. Estimated IT. Architect (1f knows,)s _ 18. Builder (it knows): 19. Related Featured$ a. Bard h. Carriage house C. Outhouse d. Shed(s) e. rotmal Garden(s) f. Windmill X. Watertover /tatkhouse Is. Other 1. mods SIGBly)CINCE 20. Bristly state historical and /or architectural lLportanae (include data, events, and persons associated with the site when knows): Ale N.aJ pe^Z M THE _0 j3je -pia [TH Fp.ta[� t ((�y /9s 'a .Y/ewLDMa �rrit�nx.n �+ F[ [�T n,r A ✓^ 1. i.�rl � N ✓C�e[.. i [[) A +.n..JH YYi LrS 7N,er 77/C enen/s . r. A.e,i.Jac 7> dE /C Bit.} /R: J /.J .S. CA" "t q p[c AO ff [. , Ms .lvwJOnn+e as�g 9f9/ 21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check call one): a. Architecture —_ b. Arts ► Lclsurs c. Ecddcmia /Iodnatrial d. Government e. Exploration /Settlemedt t. Military _ S. BelSglon b. eootal/Educatioe 22 Sources$ Lin books, documnts, rirveya, personal Interviews, and their detest 22. Date tots p +vpared By (name):.�tY..rC .�✓ �_._J Address: CSty:L}{Y.le C ✓/.+pid241 Zips *737 Phnnot 9M.1l.T7 n -anlaattons y3o V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM r � Date: Yebruuy 16, 1988 t To: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner oy From: Paula Pachon, Administrative Assistant` Subject: Additional Information on the Night Blooming v Cereus Cactus As I mentioned at the last Historic Preservation Commission meeting on February 4th, I scheduled a meeting with Mr. Jim Folsom, Acting Director of the Huntington Botanical Gardens and Hr. Joe Clements, Curator of the Desert Gardens at the Hunt! lton Memorial Library for Thursday, February 11th. The info ration below summarizes my meeting with these two experts in the fiwld of botany regarding the Night Blooming Cerous located at 7850 Valle Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91770. Mr. Clements, after viewing the photographs of the Night Blooming Cerous identified this cactus as a Cereus Poruvianus of approximately 50 - 70 years of age. This variety of cactus originated in Peru and is believed to be one of the earliest variation of cactus brought to the United states. It is a ^.rusted plant, meaning that the formation of its stem is pointed and is sometimes referred to Imonstrosus, in its form. It is a waxy cactus, hence the first part of its name, cereus. From the photographs of the particular cactus in geestion, Mr. Clements believes that it may well be one of the largest of its type in southern California. Mr. Clements also noted that this variety of cactus boar.. large tubular flowers during the summer months which appear in the evenings and oftentimes last until the early morning hours. The staff at the Huntington Botanical Gardens is excited to hear that the Historic Preservation Commission has approved this item to be forwarded to City Council for designation as a City Historic Landmark. They have asked that staff keep t.em advised as to the progress of this item as they are inventorying botanical items of historic interest throughout thn State and would, of course, want to include both this cactus and the Canyon Live Oak Tres in their inventory. I have indicated that I would be more than happy to provide their staff with this information. Larry venderson Pel�'-ary 16, 1988 Pigs 3 Si,.za my schedule does not permit me to attend the next $ Historic Preservation Commission meeting on March 3rd, I an %. requesting that the information presented in this memorandum be forwarded to the commission for their review. Should the Commission concur with the information provided by the staff 4. at the Huneington Botanical Gardens and should they feel `..hat, staff now has sufficient background information to take this item to City council, kindly notify as of their action and i will, of course, prepare the necessary paperwork and take the 7 Commission's recommendation grant City Historic Landmark designation for the High= .., .:ming Cerous located at 7850 Valle Vista Drive, Ranch, Cucamonga, CA 91730 to City- council fir their review and approval. r Your assistance in this matter is moat appreciated. cc: Historic Preaorvation Commission Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Y3 a. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Data: February, 1, 1988 1 I To: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner Prom: aaula Pacton, Administrative Assistant I Subject: Update on Activities to Gather Background Information on the :tight Blooming cersus Cactus In my attempts to gather background material on the origin, approximate age, and other Stems of interest on the Night Blooming Cereus, (7850 Valle Vista Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA.) which was nominated by the Historic Preservation Commission for local landmark, status, I have contacted the Rancho Santa Ana Botanical Cardona for information. Walter Wisura, Curator of Living Collections at the Botanical Gardens, has referred me to Jim Folsom, Acting Director of the Huntington Botanical Gardens in Bar. Marino. I have spoken to Mr. Folsom betafly over t_a telephone regarding the cactus and have scheduled to meet with him and his staff on Thursday, February 11th to review the photographs of the Night Blooming Cereus ani discuss its origin and other itens of possible interest to the Historic Preservation Commission. As you are aware, the owners of the cactus have not been able to provide any additional information on the Night Blooming Carous nor has the individual listed on the application for historlo landmark designation. I bring this Sts= to your attention merely to keep you and the Historic Preservation Commission up -to -date on my efforts to obtain the required information on this Item to take it to city Council for their review and approval. I will, of course, keep you informed as to the outcome of my meeting with the Huntington Botanical Carden. I will be at the Historic Preservation Commission's meeting on Thursday, February 4th to inform the Commission of the progress to date regarding this item and to answer any que..tions they may have. cc: Historic Preservation Commission Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner q33 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DJ EMORANr Uitil Date: November 12, 1987 To: Jim Schroeder, Building inspection Supervisor /7 v From: Paula Pathan, Administrative Assistant 1" Subject: Cactus located at 7850 Valle Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91770 As a result of your telephone call earlier last weak, I - alayad the information you provided me regarding tho cactus located at the above referenced address to the Historic Pros^— ,lation Commission at their November 7th maating. At this meetL14 the Commission also • Informally heard from th•t owner of the property who had recently filed an application for landmark status designation for this cactus; regarding the proposed action outlined to him regarding a septic tan) located on his property and the associated negative impact I. would have on the cactuz It was determined by the Commission that a Public Hearing be set fcr their next regula-ly scheduled meeting, December 3rd, to hear testimony in fa... of /oprosition to and to determina the historic significance of this cactus to the community of Rancho Cucamonga. based upon information presented at this Public Hearing the Commission may either determine that cactus is not historically /culturally significant to the city or they may recommend to the City Ccuncil that the Stem ba designated a City Historic Landmark. The final determination of City Historic Landmark designation, as you know, rests with the City Courcit. Should you wish to attend this Public Hearing and provide add - tional information to the C=ission ragcrding this item they will next: meet an December 3rd at 7:00 p.m, at the Lice Park Community Center. •7 � r —_ rni 1.".�� .u, r 9.� .� �:••�'r••1'['!P^Rr..4"✓rr_�_ 'SY ..ia..: �.su._._..._ —_ —_ — fit. ayr v.Y •GU i %!.m^'" =LT - tiw1� +C�.STizak!^- a�rYa_^t�s..a!l' .Ts� THOMAS B. SHOAR, DLD-?, INC. O[N[N/1L wiNilliiY \It NORM If YM I.YINV[ [VIYi. VIIJIMO� [�YIONNIN \,1 \I ♦[L[IMOMi W'Itl\ City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Cocmiesion December 2, 1987 During October ,987, we initiated a sewer hook up at 7850 Valle Vista D -ive. At that time we discovered one of the two active cess pools was under our ^astus garden. At the suggestion of a City Building and Safety Inspector, we initiated the present plan to keep from digging under the aarge Night Blooming Cereus Cactus present In the area. On November 25, the city Impactors reVirned to tell us that the City Code states all present Inactive cess pools must be filled under all clrcumstar:ea. AL this time we probed and found I. cess pool and hopefully will be able to retain the present Itructure of the cactus Because of the present circumstances, we lee at declaring the cactus an historical landmark Is not necessary as we as individuals plan an preserv'ng this beau;.lful old plant Z'z 04 'hows and bente hoar RECEIVED CITY OMMUNIT 0 CURVICES �+ 1. RESOLUTION NO. as - ILOS _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE NIGHT BLOOMING CERECDS LOCATED AT 7850 VALLE VISTA AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FE TORE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND 2HEREFORE s DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has adopted %!hapter 2.26 of, the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code relating to historic preservation; and wHERX%S, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission has investigated the historin significmnca of the Night Blooming Cerecus and has held public hearings concerning this site in accordance with Chapter 2.26 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code .elating to historic preservation; and NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City council-of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows; The City Council finds and determines that the Night 81 arcing Cerecus located at 7800 Valle Vista, has not the criteria established for designation an a City Historic Landmark, and therefore, and with the reco=andation of the Historic Preservation Cn=ission, designates this site as n City Historic Landaark. 1908. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th dev of March, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk Denuic L. Stout, Uayor `5F r 1 rt nc n A1Tn vn nTTn A unMCA STAFF REPORT > 1 ... DATE: March 16, 1988 l TO: Mayor and Members of the City County Our FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager r, SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF LIBRARY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Diane Williams, representing Friends of the Library, has indicatpd to the City ofe the concern impro improvements to the theL library yh within n ervies have been n essentially contributed by elthee Friends of the Library or the City of Rancho Cucaxonga. While there are some plans from the County to modify and expand the existing facility, that is basically the only coamitment thus far. It 1s recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to send a letter to the Board of Supervisors and the County Librarian, Barbara Anderson, requesting follow -up information on comaitments to expand the circu.ation of the library dnd perhaps to upgrade the status of the library to a regional facility. This would enable the library to have more books available to our residents. Regional status already has been granted to the City of Fontana. We have di_.vssed this approach with Mrs. Williams. She has been very supportive and has encouraged us to press the County on this important City issue. The upgrading of library services has for several years been a primary goal of the City Council. Therefo-e, any activity in this area, would be supportive of previously adopted City Council goals. LMW /dja J/37 N It 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCADIONGA STAFF REPORT rial DATE: March 16, 1)88 T0: of the City Col* FAUN: Dennis ennTs L. Stout, Mayor SUBJECT: RESOLUTION IN TUPPORS I. RECIX#NDATION: Aaproval of the attached Resolution. II. BACKGROUND: The attached Resolution is intended to provide a 9ERA,ofCloamznity incoronratlon and recognition of the historical - d heritage of the tri- ccomnittes of Alta Loma, Ettwanda. In thf Rosolution, the noteworthy ns far each coamnity were composed through the irput of the Historic Preservation Comission. DLS:tle J138 I RESOLUTION NO. SE—)leio A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZING THE HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TRI- CWNUNITIES HERITAGE AI.TI SUPPORTING THE PERMANENT INCORPORATION OF THE HISTORIC LEGtLIES OF THE COMMUNITIES OF ALTA LONA. CUCAMONGA, AND ETIWANOA WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which is rapidly developing a unique high Quality city image, was created from the tri- communities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etivanda; and, WHEREAS, each of these communities has its own history and rich cultural heritage that has contributed to the unique high quality image which is attracting national recognition of Rancho Cucamonga; an WHEREAS, the legacy of these communities provides Rancho Cucamonga with a rich sense of history and an important legacy for Its future which will be recognized forever; and. WHEREAS, the most noteworthy attributes of each community may be identified as follows: ALTA LOMA: This community originated from two separate agricultural colonies (Iowa and Hermosa Tracts). After railroad service was established, do election was held to select the current name by a ane vote margin. The area has been known fcr its fertile soil, pleasant climate, beautiful setting adjacent to and below Cucamonga Peak, and distinct rural atmosphere. CUCAMONGA: This community still carries the original name derived from the spanish land grant and identified as the Rancho de Cucamonga. The original Rancho was established almost 150 years ago on March 7, 1859 and contained not only the three cc=nities comprising the City today, but also parts of Upland and Ontario. Cucamonga nas been the crossroads of this region from the days of the Indians through today acting as a convenient resting place between the desert and Los Angeles on a route for the military, settlers, mail, and the original Interstate Route 66. ETIWANOA: The community was founded by the Chaffey Brothers as an agricultural subdivision which Included for the first tivo the allocation of water right shares on an acreage ownership basis, thereby establishing the foundatian for a successful grape and wine producing Industry. Other firsts for this area included installation of the first electrical lights west of the Rocky Mountains and the first long distance phone call in the world. y39 w i y_ • f n 1=, I 1 . ., .. _ _yiar ...•� '- :��{:. "tita."CV',i r•a- "" _ u :.f.. %j :. x''!'� ; -.. �� I'.. �. �.•� .'° NOV, THEREFORL, rr1E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THE FGLLO''dIHG: That the communities of Altc Loma, Cucamonga and Ettwanda have strong historical significance and the City, therefore, recognizes their unique histories as well as their importance to the legacy of Ranch,) Cucamonga; and, f- Reaffirms its strong commitment for the incorporation and preservation of meaningful historic community elements, both physicai and symbolic, in the future of Rancho Cucamonga by supporting the following concepts as well as others: 1. Retention of historic postal boundaries. 2. Neighborhood sign identification and monumentation. 3. city commitment to design elements that further protect and promote the individual communities. 9yc L i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Robert A. Rizzo Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Modifications to City CounCli Agenda - March 16. 19D8 nS'a?'rT4, •Y � I. CO„SENT CALENDAP/CZ6. at public hearing for April 20, 1988 - Approval of a Resolutian passing o Reap rtionment Report for the Storm nrain Channel (AD 86- 2), etc -- Item b removed and will bs brought back to Council at a later date. cnn mn. -- uru otwrney rapresanc s item be Continued to May 4, 1988. ill. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF -- ,no oiaceiey -s nave mace a request cu ronso r, that their Item be continued until April 4, 1988. IV. CITY MANAGE STAFF REPORT GrG-3" ISCUSSION OF TELEoHO4E SERVICES IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA. -- In a conversation a erton of Genera a eo one today, .fe ash requested teat the item be ced until April 4, 1988. V. ADJOURNMENT -- Reo,est that the meeting adjourn to a Closed Session on pending litigation regarding Trail Easement Enforcement. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Thant mu RAR:baa JOHN 0 MANNEHINO SAL BNIGUGLIO FRANK MISTRETTA. JR. March 10, 1988 Mayor Bennie Stout City Councilmembers 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, C4 91730 Dear Mayor Stout and Councllmemberst Please be advised that we represent James Carter regarding the Neighborhood Commercial Project, We hereby request a continuance of this matter, currently set for March 16, 1988 to May 9, 1988. Very t Uly yours. M HR1fJ0 4 BRIOUGLIO L /! By1 . `h�anner r� /1 jM t_Y JE Ai/bvb , L i ccn Bruce Coo stociate Plwner Apt k 440'. .vI MQR I S lggg r�8J9� JpJjllji2i3`gJsie 4333 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE '10 /RANCHO COCAM,N.,A CA 91730 13111•1 rr.04117141 900.1100 L�4 4 J C t ' O O ¢o H¢P M C O Y C O Lv - � 'J H a H • _ W O clL O L O L W o u r o 0 •� 1- mL •JmL O )•a aY O. 2 m m O O I 1-U —2 OF- tC m m lD m 0] O . . • . • Q.2 t 1{ ¢ 1 O O O O O O 00 000 O O O G O O 00 O ! i4 O) O O O O O O O (q00 to o m o 0 0 .n o too noo • o 0 r; N an )ri tiom rmNN r um N N N M ra! 11 9 s OM a 9m OPP ccc 1 Z O CO •�— Vr C O m O C C Lm m M y� — CA c .•L C C= o } e o o cr oa 6. 50 —:; W W C.)tJ U6• } (jj 6 tT W O e 000 1Y• � � � a:a o� c _ K id2 W W W 2 2 2 2 2 20 W2 Z WWW _ � O m O ¢ ¢ I � N {/) •Z u U O L = 2 3 O W Ym2 7iJ. t n L ° � -' to m • 0 O } L 7 a m O N tn1 W stn W � N uLL = o S m •.' m O- O m CO Cm ON r O OC= 6i HC am M ln0 L Uo V c m L a O t N L L L O � O C• L OS O L L L O � PO• r ¢U o m •} - H o o m olL4. J ta.11 1 S VI V)¢ to Vf LLILL U) lu f�') �• N fn S In .D n m J 9�1 A r C ) 0 I .1 I I e t Para "WARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNM O117ECTIVES FOR THE 1988 -89 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ULUGE GRANT PROGRAM Prepared for: City of Rancho Cucamonga 9220 Rose fdne Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91720 (714) 889 -1861 Prepared by, Michael firandmnn Associates, Inc. 411 West Sth Street, Suite 1010 Los Angeles, California 80012 (212) 622 -4442 March 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section pa L INTRODUCTION AND RESOLUTION ....... . ....................1 ILPONSVR& OF ..................... ..............................3 ULSTANDARD FORM 424 ............ ..............................5 IV. SUMMARY OF CDUG OUJECTIVES .. ..............................8 A. Summary of Community Development and Housing Needs........ 10 B. Description and Assessment of Use of Previoous CDBO Entltiement Ftmd3 ....... ............................... 14 C. Comprehensive Strategy /Statement of Community Objectives .... 22 D. Threo-Year Project Summary ...... ................... .....28 V. RELOCATION ASSISTANCE POLICY ........ . .................. 30 YL COMMUN.rY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ........................ 32 A. Summary ................... ............................... 36 U. Project Descriptions Pund hlaps . ............................... VILCITIZEN PARTICIPATION ........................ ............... VL HOUSING ASS ITANCE PLAN AND HOUSING ACTION PROGRAM..... DLCERTIFICATIONS .. ............................... .............. Jr,D 1018 -0004 i SECnON 1 INTRODUCnUN ■ The City of Rancho Cucamonga has participated In the federally funded Community Block Grant program since its hicorporation —first as a pert of the Urban County program administered by Son Bernardino County and, since 1982, as an entitlement ' city. Since 1082, the city has retelved $2,558,000.00 In Community Block Grant funds, which Imvo been used for a variety of projects (described in Section EU)—all aimed at meeting the federal objective oft ' "Development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing and e aultable living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate - Income." In the past, the city has pursued this strategy by, 1. Focusing efforts on the pockets of older development within the larger, rapidly growing city. 2. Encouraging the upgrading of existing housing stock through low - interest loam to low - and moderato - Income homeowners and emergency repay grants to senior citizens and handicapped household. ' 3. Improving Inadequate and substandard public facilities In identified target areas (streets, storm drains and recreation facilities). i Five target areas have been Identifled, ' 1. North Town - east. 2. North Town - west. 3. Old Alta Line 4. Southwest Cucamonga 5. Euwanda Section IV of this repor' further describes these areas. The homing rehabillUt1on program has been operating in all of these neighborhoods and citywide, but the focus of public Improvement activity has been the North Town n0ghborhood up until the 1087 -88 fiscal year. In 1987 -88, the city shifted the focus of Its effort, to the JOB /018 -0004 1 I Southwest Cucamonga noighborbeod because the major public Improvements have been completed In North Town. In soliciting Ideas for v-lects to receive Community Development Block Grant (CDDG) funding during tbl 1988-89 program year, letters were sent to all community ' groups a,,d agencies which had previously submitted suggestions, as well as to city department heeds and an adver.bement was put In the local paper Csee ' Section VRI). Ilia project suggestions which were received are described In Section VI. Notice of the public hearing on the Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives was also r bushed in the Dally Report on March ,l, 1988. JOB /018-0004 2 if i RESOLUTION NO.__ A RESOLUTION OF THE Crrr COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OWEC711VES AND SELECTING PROJECTS FOR PRELIMINARY FUNDING FOR THE COMMUNITY UBPELOPMENT BLACK GRANT PROGRAM FOR PLSCAL YEAR 1985 -89 WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is an Entitlement City under the regWations governing tho Community Development Block Grant Program; and, ,t WHEREAS, notice of the availability of funds for eligible projects was published In the Daily Report and mailed to Interested groups; and, WHEREAS, the City Staff has received proposals for protects and programs from various organizations In the Com,." .mity; and, WITE.REAS, the City Staff has conducted a need assessment to determine program eligibility and need; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has held a legally noticed public hearing in order to give the public an opportunity to respond to staff recommendations for program funding and to put forth for Council consideration recommendations of their own; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has hoard public testimony and received all frjbllo Input regarding the City's Community Development BIccP Grant Program for the next program year. NOW, THEREFORE DE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby take the following actionst 1. Determine that operation of the (lousing Rchabiltitation program In the Rood plain Is the matt practical and desirable of the alternatives, and the proposed mitigation measures are sufficient. 1 2. If relocation of household or business Is necessaryy as the result of the Community Development Block Grant program, "Jo adopted relocation policy will be followed. i3. Determine that street Improvements Is Southwest Cucamonga are the most practical and desirable of the alternatives, and that proposed mitigation measures we sufficient. 4. Select for preliminary funding the following projects and programs to be funded out of the City's .,ommunity Development Block Grand awardh s. Senior Shared flouring $ 6,300.60 b. SW Curamonga Street Improvements 363,000.00 c. Progrnm Administration (including Foir Housing) 83,400.00 Total $417,000.00 4" PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _day of March, 1988. AYES, Drown, Boquet, Stout, King, Wright NOES: Nona #' ABSENTt None 1� Dennis L. 9tout, Mayor ATTESTt r� Beverly A. Autholet, C ty t—`re—rF— 1, DDVERLY A. AL'TIIELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Ronchc Cucamonga, Califorrla, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution wds duly passed, A approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City or Rancho Cueumcnge, Callfornla, at a regular mooting of said City Council hold on the day of March, 1988. Executed this day of March, 1089 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Authalet, City Clerk et B■ C , Ferm_APp,ewd U.S. nEPARTMENT OP HOUSING AND UPOAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMC(IT OLOCR WANT PnOGMM REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS AND CERTIFICATION (Puvwant to Section 104 (h) of 77831 of the I(ous)ng cad 0,n mmhy Omfopmant Act of 1974 as Amended) ENVIRONVINTAL 1 NAME OI APPLICANT ). MRIGATIOWONANT NYMeeR APILICANTY ADDneai llneArde S,rwl dry. )ralaaMZl /Lode a. OATS OF ntoUe3TICanTIFICATION 5. REQUEST FOP RELCASE OF FUNDS. nelma of approvtd pant funds for the following Probct Ill '"tested: PROJECT GRANTEE (I/01her Than Apph"ml ' I G. CERTIFICATION. WPh refaran" to the above W00c61, the undersigned o: 'Ice, of the applicant, "nil FY: That da applicant has at least wean 171 day, Pilo, 10 wllmittmg this regumt for alone or funds and certification, published and dN- Wminatrl in the manner ptncnbud by 24 CFD 5o III (b), a nob" to Ih3 Public (a cony or wAkh Is attached) in accordance with 24 Cr 11 50 30 (a). That the apphunt Im fully "tried out Its 146 m11bilblev for erwhorumntal mWw, deddon making and action Imtainsms; to the pro• lect named above, that the applicant tat complied with the Natimd Envi,onmental Policy ALt of ISG9, that the spplieant 1131 cons- plod with Iho envisonmaltal procedures. Permit raquhemsnu and the statutory obligations of IM laws cited In 24 CFn 59.SIa1 (2): and gist the applicant has taken Into a ounl the "viroeenenlal aibrls, standards, permit requiremanls +cad olhw obligations aPpll- cable In the project under tits other Mined lawn and aulhdillet CIId in 24 CFn GG.I la) 13). Thar the lenl of embomuntal deaart" allied Out by applicant In connection with this said project Q dn1 0 did not rgWlre the mepirapnn and diuent"flon of an envirnnmenlal Impact stalement: I I M 1 That (ha dater upon Which all Netutory and rop1118IOry 'ions Pekds fay wvlew. Cwnmrnt, Moth., rvtponoo ar aster, In Io91rd to this cles,allce Iegm and ended as Indicted Wlaw; Utot all such dates which we Nnpikable to this afore, d..tearana are kdicatul below; and that with the expiation of each of the time pwlodl Indicated below, applicants is In.ompl4m+ With the requirements of 74 CFn Put 68; sit" _ cP kwo eG /GAy/YII aswsaa aaG/DAYtyft Nolla of Flnding of No Slenllipnt input. PuWlallon , Same: Cwnmenl puled — Nolla of Intent to IYepue EIS: Publlalloo Draft EIS: CtI mwnl period So": BOday period (NFPA Ragulafionel Final EIS: BOday period (NEPA NaWlaflone) 7.15ay Notioe of Intent to Ggww Release of Funds: Publlcatkm I6 shy HUD oeddon period -- - - -- Other (Specify) That I and Authorized to, and du, tortoni to also no the status of tespundMS federal ofticlal undo, the National Environmanul Pa1icY Act of 1889 and sash provision of law Ipsuflad In 29 CFH 68.1 (a) Wf Insular at the provision of thew laws apply to the HUD respoaibl• lilies lot envi onmentat inkro. dudownsking and actlon assumed and curled art by the applicant, that by a consenting, I assume the uspnmIlI lltlo, where applicable, hr the con: ict of environmental review, decidoomaking and anion as to envirmvmn -I hwer, pro. potation and circulation of draft, Imes and supplemental environmental Impel statements, and assumption of had PWncy or cooperating agenry resPonsibiihies for MOPaallon of such statements on behalf of Federal ogancles Including IIUD, wmen chase agenda content to such assumption, That I am sumonlrad to consent lo, and do, accept an behalf .1 the appllcam and personally, the Jurisdiction of the Federal count for the enforament of all maw reapondbllliles. In my official apachy as certifying offlar of the applicant. I'Vonefure, Tfla and Adonat r of Certifying 011kw of Applicant WARNING - a IO`I tool al t111e In Of d- UMtsd 6161 - Cale end Con4no PoNu we then WIfy 1. 1nY r-Imullen. dire to wo IoNs, unene ad.1r IM,Ir, Ire, wh-er knaro4d, ono wHitWly Inhere r leer • CW Ween1 q wdlYy eonleYNry r1Y IW, IYlllbw, q IlludutM, r16 -hell w.VY. M easy me1lr md*. d4 low. $. of try depwamnl ev Not., al d.e Untied ate' -, shah Is sued rot Inge Ihw llg.0oo q W"a"nd rwr Inwe mn the y-n a loom IIe1nMIYY1nI M1e4tM Url,Ct wr)Vlallgl IIUD FEOERAL ASSISTANCE '�:";, """ "`" �' •'"" "" _N /A «v°: NIA �' ❑ rv1K,• a arrclrt IDnprl•N •art swrinsse'r+ /e ..o;i neon •art IYnrY O INLU'R1CJTrOM Ir' �" M •I[mrreo r35grr(D Tr +.1 yI Q rnlcwTCS1 a 08 7 r• IT," o r ltr✓I IJ. \4MIIataMr111 ! L••I(a1(a •.'(M:rl( -\II}, rlUy((a l(lal '• rao,w+. City of Rancho Cucamonga .cw +.rn.on I1anning Division " t swum w. P.O. Box 801 r.uuaca L� q� 12 1 118 I • u•1 Rancho Cucamonga •cow San Bernardino aluu ' rwlr California aErw, 91730 n.., craze D rftt0 au (N— Larry Henderson (714) 989-1061 •' Copmunity 0cvelopmI •''`""""'•' Block Grant ' t lrnt a unc 1 Fair Housing Services r• •.rn b 1•a'a• . n......1 e.vam. a ... :±1T^d •MUGIrt.IVO•II.MI s 2 Housing Planning and Historic Preservation 3 Senior Shared Housing ;y^ •°^d'•`• 'i 4 Southwest Cucamonga Streets Phase 1 SI,Ma- v�,w\I.�wrµ -, r•war+o r�'•I.a "rrr•n(r lO Cliw.r[DrrWCIA 1 Or K42 OlMr.la.t City of Rancho Cucamonga 800,,420 ;. v ma- ilED ,wo- "cT— coco�c.Er.vl.\asl "cisa I _. Is 4417.000 m •r•uc lrli -- i nlox�i 35 35 DAII SINS U ryIAT01 a \Kam I m �, gosa I ro ' 00 7 1 12 ' i 1•.a _ -_' 417,000 w'u [uaajl.Iairq.- 1988 5 31 rtD[n• \.Dolt•10 Al"IT Ep 17 Dept. of Ilousinq a Urban Develo , (vrL.MUi<t4\ N.r 1�•.MIIyaJrll • .I1V Y11 {111FTM{ ((yl1�t� ' Los Angles Area Office Fred Stillions` _ 1615.Rest Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90015 _i ". • �- ,— �.;�..�:,�.il.�r ws r�BfT�R[Ti'alirr\T..rrrr. ,.( n •w n..a��bvuo <.rr E•ICNNt MU(a .iii •nO�l l(,M n[v�[. n r•Li •rr'nn ,+�la� �tif..v -•+. tir D-IE ��([nJ IS 1. - ^err •Nr.[nrWN Or^^N �- - In•1r bT1rMNYf'r./H ,N n. .IN<✓1 It TTYK..OF ASPITTula . •+ r •_r....ruw r..er- rr1Y C(.Ir J.L\110" MNOta 8- 88 -MC -06 -0556 ntuwt{woo . ' -- ItiI-- M,N{YI,uu N'". • IID Md111Y 1l IIJr rQY(PID 0,[ O I}"0 al _ _ • r• u. Ynw. m W On MODa.u.Nt Mi O[lu SEUCr(O Ur Si•4 rM nM[w ❑ x'11 r•nD 1,.t•nD 1.11E •SIOw'WI .Iryatm✓ry t..M\r • r..• -.r... Es rewn.\ .Ir1R..1pV <Knra.�.1q�. i.Cua[o » nG(nu w•rrt �rr.�.r.a. w L Iw. . Lr b Inr rrJ • (0 n .CiM'rr Otl�r n M oatrNa n r,• u[dncp rltl a.( 1 a1. W IAC1 fM •Ctnci.•t wi �1 ruulrn�(0 rM (Yiu• I [nN[VI a M1(Igi - -�_ t(%r ur+rWVYIbr.. -Mr O lra U O tl U=rolM 1 Irt SDDU¢sc'. t Surf m !S nl u... St o D, •IR.G.Ii 10 J If.GI\ M-F- - C � w.MM•rrr. 1 IOIµ � `-J Tw � Ib yon lS."�LN•.•.It q...N a rhl uLS\C h.N.I 1. ov c...Yr..IV I SOC11ON IV SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0DJOC77vas The City Council has identified the major community development or low - slid 4100"eto-lnceme housing need of Uio city as the need to upgrade and maintain the poc' of older development In the rapidly growing city. As wall as odder housing ' Stock, -so areas have older public Improvements which arc frequently Inadequate for an urban area, or in need of repair. Five target areas have been Identified (sea Exhibit 1)t 1. North Town - cast 2 North Town - west 5. 9outhwast Cucamonga 4. Old alta Loma S. Etlwanda Those are amaO areas —mucil less than a canto tract. Because of the mix of older and nower development In each census tract, only two of these five areas (North Town cast and west) were reported In the 1980 Census as having over 51 percent of the households earning less than 80 percent of the regional median household Income and, therefore, qualifying as low- or moderato Income nolghborloods. As a result, talthough all of the areas were targeted for housing rehabilitation loan and grant assistance, only North Town qualified for and received assistanco in the form of ' upgruded pabllc Improvements (streets, sldowalks, parks, street lights and storm drains). iIn 1985, the city commissioned a survey of households In Old Alta Loma and Southwest Cucamonga to determine whether any portion of these areus could b+ 1 shown to be over 51 percent low - and nodcrate-incoine households. Only a pardon of one street in Old Alta Loma clearly qualified, but several streets In Southwest ' Cucamonga dIJ (see Exhibit 2). ' City policy regarding the use of CDOO program funds is to deslgaato at least 60 percent of the ant(tloment funds each year for programs which directly benefit low- and modarate- income households In the city. AJOD/018 -0004 9 n 1 i — awn Towry W,,j 2 — Norm T*w EO,t 3 — OwtAwant Cwamo,pn 4 — OW AO• Lana 5 — rootettuenw.ne. Nn= 5 ? uuuw, u,uuuu,unuwu,ornrurr logo 4 p .• w3° i6� p �TuTnn,nm , i`�t t ~ tlTu 1 Marl ,T loolli i� NO SCALE City of Rancho Cucamonga RehabUitation Target Areas 1 L u-1 1 North Town -Wool 2 North Torn -Ea/1 3 southwest cuummonp, 4 Old Alto Lome 5 ioolhlll /Etlwanda we"we"000 condu. Tracts �- -- 0 Block Groups City of Rancho Cucamonga NO SCALE Consus Tracts, Block Groups and Rehabilitation Target Areas L�� ■ � • w Since the public improvements Identifcd as needed in North Town have been largely completed, the City COW-.Ca directed that the focus of the CDOG program shift to the Southwest Cucamonga target noigliborbood. ■ Joo/01e -0001 s Ai. i� iiiiii ••` u• A. SUMMARY OP COMMUNPPY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING NEEDS A profile of the city describing population characteristics (losnd on updated 1980 census data and State Department of Finance data) Is shown In Table 1. The selected target areas for housing and infrastructure rehabilitation arc all smaller than the area of a census tract. Table 2 slows a description of population ebaractcrtstllcs at the block group level for the soloct: d target areas. Data at the block group level were also obtained from the 1680 Census. TA9LE 1 POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS a Source: State Dapartment of Finance Popidatlon Research Unit as of January 1, 1987 Other data In this table were updated using the s3s,o proportion as the 1980 census. b tower Income 13 defined as those tamilltes/houscholds earning less than 80 percent or the county median Income. 306 a18 -0004 30 Number Percent 1. Total Population° 80,420 100.0 1. Sox Malo 40,290 50.1 Female 40,130 49.9 2. Race /Ethnicity White 70,689 87.9 Hispanic 13,108 10.3 Black 1,769 2.2 Other 2,975 3.7 11. Total Households 25,270 100.0 1. Total lower -Income Housoholdsb 4,953 19.6 Ui. Total Families 19,620 100.00 1. lower Income romlllts 3,327 16.5 While 2,331 12.9 Hispanic 628 3.2 Black 20 0.1 Other 78 0.4 2. Income Below Poverty Level 003 4.6 a Source: State Dapartment of Finance Popidatlon Research Unit as of January 1, 1987 Other data In this table were updated using the s3s,o proportion as the 1980 census. b tower Income 13 defined as those tamilltes/houscholds earning less than 80 percent or the county median Income. 306 a18 -0004 30 1 1 t A 1 �e Census Tract 8.02 8.02 13.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 22.00 TABLE 2 TOTAL LOW /MODERATE - INCOME HOUSEHOLDS BY CENSUS TRACT AND BLOCK GROUP 1980 CENSUS block Oroupo 1 2 1 1 2 3 4 0 fl 1 2 3 4 J Total Households 485 006 340 673 3,306 e,430 3,643 39 1,691 764 1,150 1,279 248 144 Total Low/ Modevato-Incomeb 83 151 53 71 519 523 331. 3 200 233 209 8:8 128 O1 Percent Low/ 6loderatrineome 16.8 22.0 17 1 10.5 15.3 2t.5 0.1 7.7 11.8 30.5 26.0 50.0 51.0 42.4 a Low /mnderate -:ncomo households are dofined as those with an Income lass than 80 percent of the 1980 mcd;an income for San Bernardino County. b Household Income information was suppressed for block groups not listed horn. Target areas are shown superimposed over the block group arena In Exhibit 3. in previous years, the North Town target area has been the focus of block grant funded community service and public Improvement programs, such as street reconstruc- tion. Thn Southwest Cucamonga target area has also been certified by HUD as eligible for public Improvements. This area will be the focus of community service and public Improvement projects over the next two program years. Information on the conditio,l of the housing stock Is provided in the (lousing Assistance Plnn (Section VI of this report). 1 JOB /018 -0004 I.I 11 [J L HOUSING Thera Is a need to continue city efforts ro Improve mdsting housing stock that hers 1 not meet building or safety code requlremeets yet Is basically sound mid can, with some improvement efforts, continuo to serve the housing needs of the city. Substandard units are not concentrated In ono area but are scattered In small neighborhoods throughout the city. There Is also a need to continua city efforts to eliminate discriminatlon in the sale and rental of housing and to ensure that the rights of all parties are protected. The 3 -year homing assistance plan and the 1 -year hoUSil ( action program (both attached) Identify In tabular and narrative form the housing needs of the city. There are a total of 660 substandard units wlth!n the city (out or a total housing Inventory of 22,664 units), of which 544 are suitable for rehabilitation. The total of minority ihouseholds In substandard housing is 1351 minority households requiring rental cubsldlos total 265. A substantial number of households Imam by handicapped persons or single Indivlduas with dependent children are also In the city. The cityh housing element of the general plan notes that the city's nousirg stock Is generally sound (duo to the relatively recent build -out of mucn of the city); however, the substandard and deteriorating colts In the oldar parts of tl:a city Will require Immediate atlentlen. The housing clamnnt furthur Idcntifim the expansion of the i supply )f lower priced housing units as a critical lousing Islas In the city (to 0 accommodate the recent and projected growth) lu addition to the problem of substandard .. uts. IState law requires the city to update the homing element of the general plan every 5 years, There Is a need to coordinate the long -range pionning of housirg programs to oomply with stale law with Lilo federally formed CDDO program. There Is also a need to identify the city's historic resnurces and ensure that CDOO programs and ' pioJects (such as twining rehabilitation) further historic preservation goals. '.' 2. NEIGHBORHOOD RRVITALIZATION Thr 1, a need for certain publle Improvements In older neighborhoods which have �j be iargeted for rehabilitation assistance to prevent the spread of blight and f� JOD /016 -0004 12 deterioration, to eliminate the causes of blight, and to support the Investment of public and privata funds In rehabilitation. Specific areas of Improvoment Include: o North Town street Improvements, Including rcconsh,wllon of the roadway and construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks and drivc%vay aprons on the substandard streets. • Southwest Cucamonga street Improvements, Including reconstruction ;f the direct and construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights, dvlvewsy aprons on the substandard streets, installation of sanitary sewers where nono exist and upgrade of water and sower Unes to bring them up to current hoallh and safety standards. • 4omm mily services (purls and recreation programs and facilities) to cncourago united nalghocrhood action to :mprovo the areas, combat vandalism cnd truancy and provide activities for residents and their famllics. dO©/OA -0004 13 E. DESCE IP77ON AND ASSESSMENT ON TILE USE OF PREVIOUS CDRO ' ENT' M NT FUNDS Rancho C samonga has been an entitlement city (receiving funds directly from HUD) since 1912. In that Ume, the city has received a total of $2,557,000.00. Fiscal Year 1981 -83 $300,000.00 1983 -84 437,000.00 1984 -e$ 497,000.00 1085 -88 473,000.00 1988 -811 409,000.00 1987 -88 411.000.00 Total $2,557,000.00 iThis section describes the use of those funds and assess,s the program's accompllshmmtb la terms er both the national objectives for the CDUO and the fobjectives which the City Council, has set for Rancho Cuc;.nionga's program. _1 I. FMCAI, YEAR 1982 -83 In 1982 -03, the clty received $300,000.00 which was allocated to the following programs: • liousing Reheullltetion Program b 84,700.00 • Neighborhood Center Expansion 81,000.00 ' • North Town Street Improvements (Center and Maxine Streets) 120,000.00 • Contingency 17,387.00 • Local Coats of Program Implementation 57,bl3.00 Tueso projects have been completed and the fwids expanded or reprogrammed. The city's community development objoctve for 1082 -83 included the followinga 1. To develop a program capable of Eliminating and provenUng slums, blight, and conditions dotrlmcntal to hcal'h, safety and public welfare that car. old In preserving housing stock for people of low - and moderato - Income. JOB /018 -0004 14 M 1 ' 2. Continua city efforts to eliminate conditloro which are detrimental to health, safety and public welfare; alloviate physical and cacnomic distress through tho stimulation of private Investment and bmmunity ' revitalization; and Improve the quality of comm.inity services 3. To expand end improve the quantity and quality of community services, provide needed neighborhood and community facilities and reduce the Isolation of senior citizens living within the city. R The programs funded by the city for 1982 -83 were consistent with the clty9 objectives and were also consistent with the broad national objectives specified In the "maximum feasible priority" certification. 2. FISCAL YEAR 1983 -C4 In 1983 -84, the city received a total of $437,000.1h0 In CDUO funds which were ' allocated as followsi ' ' • Housing RrhabIlRatlen Program $ $70,000.00 • Xelg;iborhood Center Expansion 297,000.00 • Fair Homing Scrvicv 5,000.00 • Contingency 5,000.00 • Loco] Costs of Program Implementation 00,000.00 These projce'z haao been completed and the funds expended or reprogrammed. The city's community development objectives for 1983 -84 were similar to the objectives from 1082 -83, and were as tot ows: ' 1. To develop a program capable of eliminating and proventing slums; blight; mcJ conditions detrimental to health, safety and public welfare that can ale' in preserving housing stock fvr penplu of low- and moderato - income. 2. To expand and Improve the quantity and quality of community services, provide needeJ neighborhood and community facilities and reduce the Isolation of senior citizen. living within the city. The housing rehabilitation and nolghborhosd center expansion programs were consistent with Objectives 1 and 2, respectively, as well as the national program 1■� objectives. The fair housing services program helps to cllminnto and prevent ■ JOD /018 -0004 15 1.' t ' conditions detrimental to health, safety and public welfare, as Identified in Objective 1. 3. FISCAL YEAR 1984 -85 ' In 19e4 -85, Rancho Cucamonga received $467,000.00 In CDBO funds which were allocated as follows: • Rousing Rehabilitation Program $ 60,000.00 ' • Psir Ilouslog Services 6,OOO.GO • North Town Park Site Acquisition 150,900.00 • North Town Street Improvement; Phase 150,000.00 • North Town Street Improvements Planning Phase 15,000.:0 • Contingency 15,000.00 • Local Costs of progdam Implementation 71,050.00 All of the projects have been completed or the funds reprogrammed. The adopted community development oujectives for 1984 -85 were+ 1. To ell.nMato and prevent slums; blight; and conditions detrimental to health, safety and public welfare while preserving the housing stock for people of low- and moderato - Income. ■ 2. To provide Information and affirmative support for the fair housing laws of ® the state end federal governments, In support of the goal of ensuring that all residents have access to a decent home In a suitable living environment 3. To provide neighborhood parks and recreation facilities In low- and moderato - Income neighborhoods In order to support rehabilitation of those areas and In order to meet the needs of the residents. Creation of lh2se centers for community activities will Improve the s.iug environment in the surrounding low- and moderate -Income neighborhoods and support the prevention and elimination of blighting conditions, as redrilred under the •r national priorities. f!3 4. To eliminate hazards to public health and safety and provide street improvements in areas targeted for Musing rehabilitation assistance. Priority In these Improvements Is being given to ovens whose residents are Predominantly low- and moJerate -Income and to repaint which will correct health and safety hazards, this improving the living environment. JOB /018 -0004 16 !� The Housing Rehabilitation Program is consistent with the first objective, fair lousing services Implements the second objective, North Town Park Implements the +; third objective and both North Town street Improvement projects address the fourth objective. All of the projects were also consistent with the national objective of giving "maximum feasible priority" to p1•oJocLs that benefit low- and moderate- sIncome households and /or eliminate slums and blighting conditions. CDBG expenditures directly benefitted lower Income households 4. PLSCAL YEAH 1965 -86 ■ In 1985 -86, Rancho Cucamon;ia recolived $479,000.00 In CDBG funds which wt:e allocated as follows: • Hntuing Rehabilitation Loan /Grant Program S 80,000.00 e North Town Park - Development 150,000.00 e North Town Streets - Belmont /Acaclla Construction 159,000.00 • 'to Alcnoped Signs 5,000.00 • utare c!eetr 10,0000.00 ' r Co.: acts /Atli "istration 20,000.00 • Prog. Hranln, tent 42,000.00 ' • Parr thous ag 8r .oes 7,000.00 e Snn. S`ared v ell •progtammea funds) 5,000.00 at. eer .npr v,m••-ts c :. - -toted in the fall of 1986 and the funds allocated to 14 '0 'o•vn Pn•v •,_- ra6c .q,mc" to pay for storm dralrtn in Turner Avenue. 71m handlcv: signs projee: r do :rmlr I Infeasible, so these funds along with some romilninp monies au cu- � L. ^Arc irirl , ton have been reprogrammed. rpn odoP:ed co nman -t ^t,,. 'tr 142'. c„ were: i JOB /01 et -0004 17 H • ell iaa' ,ne pre nu •runt; -' nett and conditions detrimental to i il•t•, r ✓o nn 1,41 We-, np• preserving No housing stock for ".,P., of for ur J n •te^ lim'. 2 , r-• It Inf nett t an 'fir save port for the fair hausing laws of t e to c at,,' nd reside. it �dcr gov. �n�.•• ,_v, lu.v- e„c, s b o sue4.ort of the goal of ensuring that recent home in a suitable living on, tror - it i JOB /01 et -0004 17 H ' 3. To provide neighborhood parks and recreation facilities In tow- and moderate - Income neighborhoods In order to support rehabilitation of those areas and in order to meet the needs of the residents. Creation of these centers for community activities will Improve the living environment in the surrounding low- and moderate - Income neighborhoods and support the provenlion and elimination of blighting conditions, as required under the national priorities. 4. To eliminate hazards to the public health and safety and provide street Improvements in areas targeted for housing rehabilitation assistance. ' Priority In these improvements Is being given to areas whose residents we predominantly low- and moderato -Income and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thug Improving the living environment. The housing rehabilitation loan/grant program Is consistent with Objectives 1 and 2. The fair housing services program serves to eliminate and prevent conditions ' detrimental to public health, safety and welfare as Identified in Objectivvo 1. A program, such as fair housing services, aim provides mediation assistance In landlord /tenant disputes. This assistance benefits low - aad moderate -Income households. The program also provides Info, motion and affirmative support for state ' and federal fair housing laws, consistent with Section 570.601(b) of thr• regulations. Finally, the fair housing services program Is cons'stent with the national "maximum feasible priority" objective. The North Town Perk project addresses Objective 3 and the North Town streets end handicapped signs programs address Objective 4. ' S. FISCAL YEAR 1986-67 In 1986 -87, Rancho Cucamonga received a total of $409,000.00 In CDBO funds which were allocated as follows: • Completion of North Town Street improvements (Acacia /Delmont) $13,000.00 • (lousing Rehabilitation 80,000.00 • North Town Street Improvements (Turner Avenue, ■ cast side) 198,000.00 ■ • North Town Street Improvements (Feron Boulevard) 50,000.00 • Senior Shored Housing 6,000.00 ' • Lair Housing Services 7,5011.00 • Administration 54,500.00 JOB /018 -0004 18 i I The rehabilitation program has spent $29,549.00 and made 18 grants and 3loans. The- Turner Avenue Street Improvement project was completed In January 1988. However, the Improvements to Peron Boulevard have been delayed until the drainage Improvements nepH to permit development of North Town Park have been completed. This is act expected until summe" of 1988. The .cmaInIng administration funds are available for reprogramming. 1 'fhe adopted community objectives for 1998 -67 were: 1. To eliminate and prevent slums; blight; and conditions detrimental to health, safety and public welfare while preserving the housing stock for people of low - and moderate- Income. 2. Tc provide Information and affirmative support for the fair housing laws of ' the state and federal governments, in support of the goal ;f ensuring that all i dents have access to a decent tame In a suitable living environment. 3. To provide neighborhood parlo and recreation facilities In low - and moderate - Income neighborhoods In order to oupport rehabilitation o: those areas and In order to meet the needs of the residents. Creation of these center fee community activltirs will improve IN living envlrr.nmcnt In the snrrounding low - and moderate- hicome neighborhoods and support the prevention end elimination of blighting conditions, as required under the ' national priorities. 4. To eliminate hazards to public health and safety and provide street ' Improvements is areas targeted for housing and rehabilitation assistance. Priority in these improvements Is being given to areas whose residents are predominantly low- and moderate -income and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thus Improving the living environment. The housing rehabilitation loan /grant program and the senior shared hoi.dng programs arc consistent with Objectives 1 and 2. The fair housing services program serves to eliminate and prevent conditions detrimental to public heath, safety and welfare, as Identified In Objective 1. A program, such as fair housing services, also provides mediation assistance In landlord /tenant disputes. This assistance benefits low- and modcrala-income louspholds. The program also provides Information and affirmative support for state and federal fair housing laws, consistent with Section 570- 601(b) of the regulations. Finally, the fair lousing services program Is 1 ensistent with the national "maximum feasible priority" objective.- ' JOO /018 -0004 19 I no two street Improvement projects located in North Town (Turner Avenue, east side, and Peron Boulevard) are consistent with Objective 3, and they support the completion of North Town Park by providing safe pedestrian access (sidewalks) to ttw park. All o: the projects are consistent with :ba national program goal of giving "maodmum feasible priority" to projects benefitting low- and moderntNincome residents. All of the programs met the critcela for low- and moderate-Income benefit —that Is, loo percent of the programs boner it low- and noderatNlncome residents. 6. MCAr. YEAR 1987 -88 In 1987 -88 (the current program year), Rancho Cucamonga received $411,000.00 In CDBC funds which were allocated as follows: • )lousing Rehabilitation $106,000.00 • Senior Shared Housing 6,300.00 • Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvements (via CanlBo) 217,000.00 • Program Administration (Including fllr lousing) 81.700.000 Total $411,000.00 Progress to date on Imglementstion of the-so programs he., Included: • The housing rehabilitation program has spend $41,341.00 and mad, 24 grants and no loam. • The senior shared housing progrsm has spend $1,564.00 and counselled 27 people leading to 2 room mate matches. • The design phase or Via Carrillo is approximately 50 percent complete. Construction is expected In the summer. Only 4277.00 has been spend on this project. The adopted community objectives fa 1987 -88 are: 1. To eliminate and prevent slums; blight; and conditions detrimental to health, safety and public welfare while preserving the housing stock for people of low- and moderate - Income. This Is in direct compliance with the JOB /018 -0004 20 x national objective of eliminating slums and blight Only low- and moderatrincume houseboldo are eligible for loans or granti, which Is also In accord with the federal regulations (Section 570.202). 2. To —Ovido Information and affirmative support for the fold housing laws of the state and federal governments In support of the goal of ensuring that all residents have access to a docent home In a suitable living environment, and the requirement that the city affirmatively further fair Musing (Section 570.601(b)). 0. To eliminate hazards to the public health and safety and provide street e Improve,ents In areas targeted for Messing rehabilitatio,t assistance. Priority In these lmprovements is being given to areas whose residents are predominantly low- and moderate - income and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thus Improving the living environment. These programs will further the national goals of eliminating slums and blight and primarily benefit low- and moderate -Income households. ' 4. To provldo neighbcrhood pario and recreation facilities In low - and moderates -Incomo neighborhoods of Southwest Cucamonga In order to support rehabilitation of those areas and In order to meet the needs of the e residents. Creation of these centers for community activities will Improve the living environment In the surrounding low - and moderate -Income neighborhood and support the prevention and elimination of blighting Lconditions, as required under the national priorities. 5. To provide eeunseling and referral services to senior citizens. ■ The projects and programs funded In 1987 -88 were selected because they conform ' with these objectives. The housing rel.bllitation Ivan /grant ,program and the senior shared howIng program are consistent with Objective. 1 and 2.. The fair Musing services program serve to cllmlmte and prevent condltiore detrimental to public ' health, safety and welfare, as Identified In Objectivo 1. A program, such as fair Musing rervlces, also provides nedlatiott assistance In landlord /tenant disputes. This assistance benefit+ low- and moderate-income Ma.ohelds. The program also provides information and affirmative support for state and federal fair Musing laws, consistent with Section 570.601(b) of the regulations. Finally, :M fair Musing services program is consistent with the national "maximum feasible priority" objective. The Southwest Cucamonga street Improvement project Is consistent with 1 Objective J. It is the first public works project In a series of plar red Improvements to the infrastructure of the Southwest Cucamonga low- and moderatc-income target area. The projoct is an eligible activity under S,etlon 570.201(c)(9) of the regul,.lions. ■ JOU /01 li -0004 21 I TJ C. COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY (sTATEESENT OF CGMMUNIT: OBJECTIVES) Based on past direction from City Council and the analyshr of community needs Involved in the preparation of the community development plan, the following comp•ehmhsive strategy (Including statement of community objectives) was ' prepared. Programs proposed to achieve these objectives are listed under each objnctivb. A detailed descripllon of each project is contair.ed In the attached project descripli.m sbeets (see Section Vi, Community Development Program). City police rcgard'eg the CDBG program is to designate at least 60 percent of the entitlement funds each year for programs which directly benefit persons of low - and mo orate- Income. 1. HOUSING MAINTENANCE AND REIIABB.rrAnON MISTING PROGRAM) lieadt Assessment FIWInir ' There Is a need to continuo city efforts to Improve existing housing stock that does not meet building or safety code requirements yet is basically sound and can, with ' some improvement efforts, continue to serve the housing needs of the city. Substandard units aro not concentrated In one area but are scattered In small neighborhoods throughout the city. O' ective To eliminate and prevent slums, blight, and conditions detrimental to health, safety and publ!c welfare while preserving lho housing stock :or people of low- and moderate - Income. This is in direct compliance with Use national objective or eliminating slums and blight. Only low- and moderate- Incor.o households are eligible for loans or grants, which is also In accord with the federal regulations (Section 570.201). Programs ' Ttc existing Ihousirg rehabilitation program offers deferred loans and below - market ' Interest rate loans to persons /familis of low- or moderate - Income and home improvement grants for minor projects to senior citizens and disabled or handicapped 1 JOB /018 -0004 22 b Persons throughout the city. This program Is managed by the San Bernardino County Office of Community Development through a contract with the city. Funded g activities tnchidc: o Outreachlpublic Information. o home Improvement loans. o Home repair grants (senior citizen, disabled, handicapped persons). Housing maintenance and rehabilitation activities reflect the golds of the houv!ng assistnnca plan (HAP). The rehabilitation goals In the HAP arc met through this program. In 1982 -83, $84,OOD.00 of the city's block g:snl was allocated for this program and $20,000.00 was expended. In 1983 -84, $70,000.00 was allocated and $42,000.0o was expended at the end of the year. AB of the funds from th 1983 -84 program year have been expended. In 1984 -05, S130,00.00 war allocated and $44,800.00 was expended. In 1985 -86, $80,000.00 was allocated and $126,000.00 was spent. In 1986 -87, $49,660.00 was spend of the $80,000.09 budget. In 1987 -88, only $7,500.00 uns been spent of the $106,000.00 set aside for tee program. 2 HOUSING AND IIISPORIC PRESHRVATION PLANNING Needs Asstssmmt Finding There is a need to coordinate the research, planning and program development In the general plan and the Historic Preservation Commission with the CDBO program to avoid conrllets end ensure consistency. Objective To coordinate the research, planning and Implementation programs for the general pinn Musing element revision, the Historic Preservation Commission and the CUBO program JOB /018 -o9n4 23 I Programs During Vic 1988 -89 fiscal year, the city will be revising the housing element of the •� gen_ral plan to reflect changing conditions since /ho last element was prepared and to comply with recent changes In state law. The City Council has also recently directed the ll'$ torlc Proservathon Commission to develop policy recommendations to ensure preservation of Ute city's historic resoureer As part of tin administration of the 1998 -99 grant, staff will participate in thox planning and program development efforts. 0. PAIR ROUSING (SRLWMG PROGRAM) Needs Assessment Finding ' There is a need to continuo city efforts ti eliminate discrimination in the sale and rental of housing and to ensure that the rights of all parties are protected. ' Ob ccilve To provide Information and affirmative support for the fair lousing laws of the state ' and federal governments In support of the goal of ensuring that all residsnts have access to a decent home In a suitable living environment, and the requirement that the city affirmatively fu•ther fair housing (Section 570.601(b)). Programs This year two agencies have submitted proposals to provide services in this area. The San Bernardino County Community Rousing Resources Board has requested $18,000 to provide fair lousing education only. Inland Mediation Board has equested $8,654 to continue their contract for a full-range of fair housingservices, Including: o Outreach and public Information. o Landlord /tenant mediation. ' o Counseling on fair housing laws. JOB /018 -0004 24 I In 1982 -83, Inland Mediation handled 145 cases from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, In 1983 -94, they handled In excess of 160 cases and In 1584 -85 they handled 223 cases. In fiscal year 1985 -86, 188 cases were processed and in 1986 -87,, 1 over 220 cases wera handled. Inland Mediation expects to handle some 230 cases from Rancho Cucamonga in 1987 -88. The agency has tv,o paid staff members and rallies panmrily on volunteers to provide vital Informat'on and counseling. Tlo grant request 13 prcportlonol lased on the percentage of their cases which are In Rancho Cucamonga C xpproxlmately 8 percent). ' 4. SENIOR SNARED HOUSING (EXISTING PROGRAM) Needs Assessment ^i There Is a need for public services In support of other CDDG programs, particularly those targeted at senor citizens In the area who are lower Income but may not Dye in a target area. These residents are not aware of the range of housing options available to them to continue to live Independently. Objective To provide counseling and referral services to senior citizens to ass'st them to manage :heir homes and remain Independent. The emergency repair grant prcgram Is targeted at seniors, and staff finds that these clients frequently need counseling on other housing- related Issues. Program Continue under contract with Inland Mediation the program that counsels seniors on their housing options and matches people who want to share their home with sanior citizens In need of housing. This Is the third year for the program and the comseling work (assisting seniors to Identify and evaluate housing options) is proving to be more valuable than the autual matches. JOD;nIC -0004 25 c S. PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS (EMSTING PROGRAM) Nevis Assessment Finding I' There is a need for certain public Improvements In predominantly low- and moderate - income neighborhoods which have been targeted for rehabilitation assistance to prevent and eliminate blight mid deterioration. These Improvements would reinforce private efforts and eliminate hazards to public health and safety. Two neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga have been certified by HUD as clibiblo for those types of improvements —North Town and Southwest Cucamonga. Most of the Improvements in North Town have been completed. In 1987 -88, City Council directed staff to shift the focus of CDRG efforts to Southwest Cucamonga. Objective ' To eliminate hazards to the public ncalth and safety mid provide street Improvements in areas targeted for housing rehabilitation asslstance. Priority in these Improvements Is being given to areas whose residents we Wedominanlly low- _' and moderate - Income and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thus Improving the living environment. These programs will further the national goals of eliminating alums, blight and primarily benefit low - and moderate- Income households. Proffams The engineering department has prepared an estimate of tM cost ct the necessary sheet Improvements In Southwest Cucamonga. Thoy are: • Arrow Route (from Grove to Sierra Madre) :296,000.000 • Ninth Street (from Grove to Baker) 950,000.00 s Via Carlllo (entire) 208,000.00 • Placida Court (entire) 56,000.00 • Avenida Vejar (Grove to Sierra Madre) 159,000.00 • Calaveras Avenue (Ninth to Arrow Route) 270,000.00 • Calaveras Avenue (south of Ninth Street) 149,000.00 • Sierra Madre Avenue (north of Arrow Route) 172,000.00 26 JOE /0184004 i, ' o Sierra Madre Avenue (Arrow Route to Ninth) 249,000.00 o Sierra Madre Avenue (south of Ninth Street) 149,000.00 o Vinmar Avenue (north of Salina) 71,000.00 ' o Vinmar Avenue (south of Ninth) 135,000.00 o Salina Avenue (Calaveras to Sierra Madre) 138,000.00 o Alley south of Ninth Street (entire) _ SI.0a0.00 Total $1,761,000.00 Necessary Improvements Include pavement rehabilitation, construction of curbs, gutters. sidewalks and the installation of street lights. Some areas also need sanitary sewers and water line upgrading. Such projects arc eligible under Sections 570.201(cX8), (9) and (10). r Given the extent and cost of the needed Improvements, this will be a multi-year pprogram. The first phase of the improvements will be the streets north of Arrow Ilighway. That is, Phase f Includes, o Via Carillo o Avenida Vejar 0 Sierra Madre and Placida Court ' Improvements to Via Carillo were funded In 1987 -88. For 1988 -89, staff is proposing to fund both the dcslgn and construction of Avenida Vejor and the design and construction of Improvements to Sierra Madre and Placlda Court. 1 G. COMMUNITY SERVICES (NSW PROGRAM) Needs Assessment Finding There Is a need to provide recreation facUltics accessible to persons and families of low- and moderate - Income in eligible low- and moderato -Income neighborhoods. The. two areas which qualify in Rancho Cucamonga are North Town and Southwest Cucamonga. The acquisition and development of a park ht North Town was selected for funding in 1984 -85 and 1085 -86. However, since other means were found to acquire and develop this park, three funds were reprogrammed to the Turner Avenue storm drain. JOD /018-0004 27 ' -- TarDef Area I IV ✓ � VI . y ty. LM J—' a tlllti NO SCALE Southwest Cucamonga �.L_j Street Improvements- Phase I i e i w t Objective _ To provide neighborhood parts mid recreation facilities In low- and moderate - income neighbc oodz of Southwest Cucamonga nod North Town in order to support rehabll. rtlon of dose areas and In order to meat the needs of the residents. Creation of these centers for community activities Will Improve the living environment in the surrounding low- and moderate-Income neighborhood and support the prevention and elimination of blighting conditions, as regtd :od under the national priorities. Programs The Community v)evclopment DeKrtment has :equested $80,000.00 to roof and enclose a patio at the neighborhood center to create additional spars for the prog ams. No other park projects are — oposed for 1£188 -80. _This project is eligiblo under Section 570.2J1(e)(1) and (2). JOO/018 -0004 28 0 0 q ' D. THREE -YEAR PROJECT SUMMARY ' Bes,,d upon the comprehensive strategy outlined above, the city's 3 -your program for the ODBG program Is summarized In the Table 3. The table identifleJ, by program objective, the projects proposed for funding for fiscal years 1987 -88, 1988 -80 and 1989 -90. T1e estimated percentage breakdown of funding by objective Is based upon Past city experience wit„ the block grant program (from 1082 -86). TABLE 3 THREE -YEAR PROGRAM SUMMARY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Estimated % Program CDSG Funding Cr mmuaity Development Proposed Strateg Allocation and tfousin ves L Ub ecti I9e8 -89 1987-90 1987 -89) I. ilousing mn(ntenance Housing rehabilitation Continuation of Up to 25% and rehabilitation B repair grant probaam cidsting program 7 Pair Housing Inland Mediation Continuation of Up to 5% 1 existing program 3. Community Sarvices — Provision of Up to 70% (Southwest Cucamonga additional Perk, neighborhood facultles center and North Town park) 4. S1rPel Imq•ovemcnt9 Southwest Cucamonga Provision of Up to 70% streets (Avenida Vcjm• street Improvements Sierra Madre, Plaeldn and associated Court) public fuellitles a At least 60 perce.it of the funds In each year will be allocated to programs which will directly benefit persons of low- and moderate - Income. The programs and funding alloy ations are considered estimates and may be subject to chango and /or addition. The community devclnpmcut programs to be prepared by the elt,y during tiro current 3-yew planning period will continue to pursue the primary objective of the GDBG program; however, now and /or innovative programs may be proposed r r conjuictlai with the 1 -your programs which are not specifically hdentif!ed In this 3 -year community development and housing plan. JOB /013 -0004 29 G I SECTION v RELOCATION ASSISTANCE POLICY None of tiro activities proposed fee funding this year cr anticipated In 188840 would ' Involve the displacement of resido is or businesses. However, In the event that displacoment should occur, provisions for relocation assistance will be made In dconformance with lire city's adopted relocation policy and tho requirements of federal and state law. Recent cnanges In the regulations governing the expenditure of CDRG funds require that the city establish a policy governing the provision of relocation assistance to any family, Individual, business, nonprofit organization or farm that results from Implementation of It CDRG programs. It is the policy of the city to avoid displacement of all families, individuals, businesses, nonprofit n- .ganizations and farms In carrying out Its CDRG programs. No displacement Is ozpeeted to result from the activities propo3ed for the 1888 -88 fiscal year. However, In the event that operation of any of the CDBQ funded programs results In the voluntary or Involuntary displacement of any family, indhiduai, business, nonprofit organization or farm (whether owner or renter) the city will provide relocation assistance in accordance with the standards and guidelines act forth Intha federal Uniform Relocation Assistanco and Peal Prorxrty Acquisition Act and Section 7260 (or seq.) of the Stale of California Govcrnmomt Codo (Title 25, Chapter 6) and the guidolines Issued by the Commission of Ilousing and Community Development. The city will meat Its relocation resporelbllitles through the use of Its staff and consultants, -. pplementcd by assistance from local reaRors, social agencies and civic %vpnlrntions. It Is the elt.es objective that all dlsplacees be relocated with a minimum of hardship in accommodations which are decent, safe, sanhary and sulti b r to their Individual needs; 1Ncate�i In areas not less desirable than their current location in regard to public utilities and public and commerclal facilities, and reasonably accessible to their customars or places of employment and priced within their firaucial means. JOB /018 -0004 30 •t• r 1 The city anticipates no relocations, and will handle eoso which result from Implementation of CCDO activltes in an Inalvidual case -by -case manner. Services provided to eligible displaceas shall Include but not be limited toe • Providing Information on project activities, rights, benefl(s and options open to them. • Malntalning liaison between displacces and agencies x firms with resource to assist them (e.g., Chamber of Commerce, Smell Business Admtnletretton, Office of l.ncal gconomle Development, landing Institutions, roaltors, etc.). • Locating, Inspecting, evaluating or stimulnting the production of accommodations to meat the needs of all displaced. • tmisting dlsplacees in obtaining financing. • Assisting dlsplaeees In securing pelorlty eonslderaticn for Section 0, public ' housing or other housing assistance programs. • Making referrals to appropriate rectal, community and welfare agencies. ' • Assisting eligible displacoes to prcpns•o claims to, all relocation assistance payments to which they arc enlltled. • Keeping records, maintaining files and coordinating all relocation activities. • Providing all families, Individuals, businesses, Institutions and farms which are displaced by CDDO- funded programs, with written notice of tnts policy, the t of services available to them and the amount of relocation ass si tancc benefiLs fcr which they may be eligible. (Payments will be those established by state and federal guidelines.) City staff and con+ultan s will be available to answer questions and provlW Information, and by their early Involvement to ace that relocation proevnds with a minimum of hardship. f I' ' JOS /018 -0004 31 aP�tuK `� PMtBttC PnAO a.o tlgvatA CA4A leag- 89 Cola Mtduttce't �t \mate °t 00 COMM \tes Swat en Ncto avlous vests, OW cn dtv atoll t 6tam year, letters nauSS°sttoly Wbt�tshad to tha D '1 sanuori tpg8ct tbo IS B2 d o� rn\tted Pro$ycment '4 as also N to aaR° whteb to An EL or tendln8° pv*, lWaul aSenCY9 eds. tadt ;Y V46 RS one .Itt dove P�eje to weret`n nS ta'.��tn8 g35A00.00 goovs rt" Board Report' tntatcotion ar u o ProvacslAdm Board cattytlp°stnStt°g0�� Non°wt�atdan6 gcc and tdedtdtno County Comm anu (o "o 6,300.00 - W pctnm oo o� .son bU\lat \on t° . o \a5 ovex" 10'1,p00'00 ° tProgramI � in8 ton's � I,nov, ` Senlor ah0rcd us tip and eootruct\on p00,po 0 and co tc° °tion A,02, A Va1� and 400.00 o vc�ncdet to att'y °0r 4r tgn an A, Cow, hos° of l eldsO Y txd� tl P 5600.00 sierra tnedrol ON do tnaw Pab1tC aerv\col 55000.00 a Ncw P ea ,dcol tstan ser tl¢n n+dff osln 8 Pe th° w b �°r a n od Cent 0 o tio at N C %ST dent l is even below• the ally \1etian PrOSr °m am op°cet m otters tOend tdet0 intocmaUon on cod+ Pros°° n Pr Pr age a s00.p diOt cant: °Sr the h\ tow 0 ,..,� 1. �co'ct t b t'n 1 tv ott� Q Boo s to 0. 1 wncrss0 and ST dt°�l'tst co y twPge to A�dt Uon 1mOdeer , i clt 000 ee tots od th° It�°tis °al Yeer top tundtn8 under III; to ceps so Stan of CD :ax m� 8ls to b J ttvtty cll6tblo t CA oc P'even 2021 °�• b9� aC 22 .lur,'� tljt ® CA a t �0610t�Opoa ' SEC71ON VI 191849 COMMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM In January 1080, when city staff was given eat estlmato of the amount of CDBG funding to expect In the 1987 -08 program yea:, letters were sent to all community groups and agencies whielt.had submitted program suggestions in previous years, as well as to city department heads. An advertisement was also published In the Dally Report. The following projects wore suggested for fundingt o Program Administration (including fair busing services) $83,400.00 - Wand Mediation Board - San Bernardino County Community Housing Resource Board o House rehabilitation loans and grants (on -going program) No now funding o Senior shared housing (on -going program) 6,300.00 o ttvanida Vejer- design and construction (now phase of multl -your project) 167,000.00 a Sierra Madro /Plaeldn Court design and construction (new phase of multi -year project) 202,000.00 o homeless assistance (now public service) 8,OOC.00 s Senior dental health (new public service) 5,600.00 o Enclosing atio at Neighborhood Center 85,000.00 More Information on each project is given below. ' 1. Protect Name t housing Rehabilitation Program Deserlotion Continuation of the existing program operated for the city by the County of San Bernardino. The program offers low - interest loans of up to 315,000.00 to eligible low - and moderatrincome homeowners and grants of up to $1,600.00 to senior citizens and disabled residcnL to make minor emergency repairs to their homes. The county tropes to maka 15 loans and 30 grants In fiscal year 1988 -89. CDBU Rliglbillty: The program Is an activity eligible for CDDU funding under Section 570.202(c). JOB /018 -0004 32 I s i e e Funding R&Zi sted No additional funds are requested for 1888 -89. Environmental Stains This Is a multi -year project. Environmental clearance was given in 1980. The program has not changed since then. Procedures to avoid potential noise, flood plain and historic resources Impacts are In place and still adequate. 2. Project Names Senior Shared Housing D:sari,Alon: Continuation and expansion of an exlsling public service Description: program operated by Inland Mediation Board. Senior shared housing offers counseling to senior citizens to Identify and evaluate housing options. Where the senior can no longer live alone, counselors will attempt to locate a roommate or home to share, for those who want to remain as independent as possible. The services support the scalar emergency repair grant program and the senior programs operated by Location: the city through the neighborhood center and predominantly CDBG 211gibllity. benefit low- and moderatrineoma seniors. Lo tlon: Citywide. CDBG Eligibility: This program Is an allglblo activity for CDBG funding under Section 570.201(eX3). Funding Requested: Inland ModlalloWs funding request is proportional to the number of clients In the city. For 1988 -89, they have requested $8,300.00. Environmental Status: This project Is a multi -year project which is under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 24 CFIt 58.34. 3. Project Nano: Southwest Cucamonga Street improvements (Avenida 7ejar, Placida Court and Sierra Madre, north or Arrow Route) Description: This Is the second year of a multi -year project to upgrade the public Infrastructure in tl:e Southwest Cucamonga target area. The improvement will Include design and enginecrtng; roadway reconstruction; corslructlon or curbs, gutters and sidewalks; Installation of street lights; and upgrading for water and sewer lines to bring them Into compliance with current health and safely standards. Location: Crusts Tract 21 (sea attached map). CDBG 211gibllity. This project Is cliglbli for CDDG funding under Section 570.201(cX8), (9) and (10). Funding Rcyuired: Engineering $30,800.00 Construction 330 100.00 309,000.00 No other funding sources wl!l be used for this project. JOB /018-0004 33 f fEnvironmental Status: This Is part of a multi -year project which will require, environmental clearance for flood plain, noise, biology and historic resource Impacts. f f4. Project Name Neighborhood Cuter Improvements .1)MMIPtIon : Funds have been requested to roof and cncleso an cafsting patio to provldo additional space for senior programs at the f neighborhood center. The neighborhood center Is located In the North Town target area. fLoestioa: Census Tract 21 (see attached map). CDBG BllgibIlity : This proj"t Is eligible for CDOG funding under Section f570.201(c)(1) and (2). Burling Requested: Design $10,000.00 f Construction 70 000.00 $801000.06 No other funding sources have been Identified for this fproject. Environmental Status: This Is a now project which has not been reviewed for environmental Inpact. Thn project Is neither exempt nor f excluded from review under the National Cnvironmental Policy Act (NBPA), but no adverse Impacts are expected. f S. Project Name: Senior Dental Health fDescription: This Is a imposed now service to senior citizens In Rancho Cucamonga which would offer dental screening and f education. The objective Is to maintain and Improve the health of the city residents. The program would compli- ment other public scrvlcz afford senior citizens through the neighborhood center. The project would l:e operated by fSan Bernardino County Health Department. Weation: Citywide. fCDBO BBa)billty This project is eligible under Section 570.201(e)(0). f Funding Requested: CDOG $5,000.00 Other San Bernardino County f fJOB /010-0004 04 f Fhvlronmental Ststus: Ibis Is a new public servlico which has not been funded oy CDDD previo=ly. It is categorically exempt from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act under Section 24 CPR 58.34. JOB /018 -0001 35 SECTION VR CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN I The City of Rancho Cucamonta encourages and solicits the participation of Its ' residents In the process of Identifying projects for funding by the CDDO. the citizen participation program consists of the following six elements: 1. Outreach. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encouraC— citizen participation, with a particular emphasis on participation by persons of ' low - and moderate -income and residents of older neighborhoods which are experiencing physical deterioration. In order to reach as many residents and community groups as possible, letters will be sent to emmunity ' organizations and Individuals who participated In the program In recent years. In addition, a display advertisement will be published In the Daily Report at least a month prior to publication of the preliminary statement. f' 2. Notice. The City of Rancho Cucamonga provides citizens with advance no Tcu of all meetings related to the CDDO program and makes copies of all related material available for public roviae, as soor. as notice is given. Notice of the hearing on the preliminary statement of community objectives will be published on In the Dally Iteport, 10 days prior to the hearing. Notices will also be published In public places throughout the city with special postings In target areas. 3. Technical Assistance. Community groups and particularly lower-Income ' groups frequently it the time and knowledge :necessary to develop a proposal for CDDO Ending that satisfies statutory requirements. The City of Rancho Cucamonga publishes the names and tawphone numbers of staff familiar with the CDDO program who are available tr, answer questions and help residents package a proposil. 4. Publle lien -in in . The City of Ranchi Cucamonga Lacs public hearings to ' obta ni citizen's views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the program A rearing s held on the preliminary statement of community objectives at which the city's housing and community development needs ara reviewed, past policies and programs are dismissed, ■ and each rraposed project is explained. A preliminary selection of s objectives and programs is then made and published for public review and comment. The hearing on the final grant application Is held a month later. AD hearings are duly noticed. Agendas and staff reports are available In advance, and the :neotingv are held in the Lien's Center, which Ir r. By accessible to the handicapped. ' S. Accessibility. Several of tha older nelghborloods havo substantial hispanic populations. At meetings where It Is likely that the attendeea will not be bilingual, the city will rrovide an interpreter to ensure that residents can Qunderstand and participate in the procedures. JOB /01 8-0004 36 t 6 1 JOB /018 -0004 37 e 6. Rrs rolveness. Once projects have been funded and are underway, the c ty cromm fled to ensuring the satisfactory execution of each project. Staff Is available to explain the program and discuss projects. Staff provides a timely response to all written complaints— trually within 15 working days. In the 5 years that the city has operated a CDBO program, fewer than 5 written criticisms have been received. Citizen Participation Plan Implementation for 1068 -89 Included the following foaturew 1 1. Outreach. Letter soliciting program suggatiotn were sent to community groups en January 7, 1988, and a display adverthiament to alert the general ' public was published In the Deily Report for February 1, 1980 (copy attached). ' 2. Notice. Notice of the public hearing on the preliminary statement of ' commanity objectives on March 16, 1988 was published In the Dally Report on March 4, 1988. o Technical Assistance. Staff responded to Inquiries cnd assisted several groups to provide o necessary Information for an application for CDRO runds. The agencies so assisted worst o The VIP Club o Inland Mediation Board 1 o Concerned Citizens for Community Awareness o San Bernardino County CHRB o San Bernardino Coumty Dental Health 4. Publlu Hearings. The public hearing on the preliminary statement of community objectives will be held March 16, 1588. Notice of the hearing was published an March 4, 1988. 5. Pccesslbillt *. If necessary, Interpreters will be provided at all hearings. f 6. Rcronsiveness. Nr, written eomf Jats on the CDBO program or Its opmdTF� Fwerc rt.:olved in 1987 -88. t 6 1 JOB /018 -0004 37 w w Lo O �03 �m E 1 c LE m CL m 1� IFF w Q ISO w R, i 116 Ak �y C m ,�4e�c94� you �, o SAllyMyjw 6 a • OZw &jhh°�jU• E Q wzzwza�h¢"� vaaN=w�I�i� m OC U. OwZowozg TmZp¢a=� = °a J z = 0 _ HIP'E "� II �•�355 CIA a'� z �a yyyaJV�4. '� 1121, ca � �ld° 8 � B.a il� j °yY yyip EoaOO .JR�O 9a°``j �laj x.y,H i zES�a��$ —� ;,l del !a W, y 3 1 W Q r Z 2 J W 3 c S ma+ z H W L" W 9 Y YS u = MC4 ui p X:) H8r3 N ' • (7 �E !.0 3� m a 8 U pp 33 Ny �i Ea 0 ', c o 09 .. C°' X0 0 mE$° Mal m rnv em $yQfin° E 83.2 t cn E ci O0 f c Om rm .3 o c C C Q °m`.n�d rnl m o m aE a a o m „ P a” o o ` Q Q N `o � o?E�0E o o E o� �va o�saTma� `oE m o m gai om so _n; °° c Sao ®45 o(��uaQ E gm - o o m `o o E `ocn a E u_— c m m o c°orn2:m m E n c c A om ,.� �E:`.`on°ultim m mm o - oS ,u 2 c muZ' W S 02>0 Da�a r. ° E 0 Lia EEl mmk G m O p A m; �� 'c ff•°,� � c 0 •°• W V , p'__-6:E b'E 2 n b „'O cr .� F° u o o 2 o w CQ Q E" U0 m 'c .o z c U 0 m• r � i-c EELS o�.n 00� s C)MO �j4,b1 i U.B Deparimenl of 11OufL19 and Urban DelvNepmer InNM�M • j lo, Ap•N• 011k•. Npan IX r ( leis Will ory,oON be .." + +..,.� ls, Anp•Nq G•IIIOrNf 00010.3f01 _ 41� rXn;r I - 1706 Mr Lauren Wasserman City Manager Citv of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Wasserman: SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant Program No. B- 07- MC -06- 0556 -CILy of Rancho Cucamonga Annual (lousing Assistance Plan Approval In accordance with 24 CFR 570.306 and current Instructions, this " off,,e has reviewed your Annual (lousing Assistance Plan for the period October 1, 1906 thru September 30, 1907. Based on our review, we find your (lousing Assistance Plan to be acceptable and it is therefore approved. Accomplishments toward your goals will be reviewed annually as reported in your IPIP Performance Report: and as a result of our �aoni- toring of your program. I Sipcerely, t(" t_LcItLam_, njamin F. Bobo, Fill 0. L K Manager Los Angeles Office, 9.4S 1 _ I r` 1 r > _ s 31 •' 7r UOJ rJJ • Oh0000 � = T � e � q � tl 'lrq Jr 3 9 N O O i K K J y U S O t 4 4 , tU J O Y S S 0 b y � J ❑ Y _p _p 5 F a 40 q • Q O: � ' P Y u v y Y YQf i s G• � n o u u. O ^f pPj � tl N U t #� �La3 r Wq m° m o o h S Q C 6 U O N y > PZ[ W L d Y O d G Y Y r� F O i a 0 ro m ' o u A o L O dl W � O u tl d O~ M -I Sm Q ya M p t p V Y M O Y d O K u O q C J p Q h O I O O i 8 F r N 1'1 J M b t 0 i iCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA fbIRRATIVO FOR THREE -YEAR AND ONO -YEAR GOALS 1006 -1700 ROUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN i iI Displacement NO Substandard lower income households orelocated so ae result demolished of edirect i Federal, State, or loca: actions. II. Actions the City Will Take to Implement Its One and Three iYear Goala, A. Mortgage Revenue Uonda (owner) iThe Redevelopment Agency sells mortgage revenue bonds to provide below market mortgage financing for owner i occupants. Most users will be moderate income, none are expected to be luw income. Issues funding an estimated 1,500 mortgages have been sold in tho`past threw years. The 7oa1 will be realised, therefore, i subject only to market conditions and the developers' ability to develop and sell the home i0. Multi - Family Revenue Bonds (ranter) By cooperation r7reement with the County of Sar i Bernardino, rental projects In Rancho Cucamonga with 20 percent of the units restricted to low income households at rants leas than 10 percent of Income, may be financed with County Multi- romily Mortgage Revenue Bonds. Eomu 705 additional units have been proposed. Developer interest is currently very strong However, market conditions and developer parformance will dlctato whether the units committed are completed. C. CDOG Rehabilitation Loar.s iThrough a contract with the County of San Bernardino, the City offers low interest rehabilitation loans to i lower income households citywide. Approximately 0.5 units per year or 25 snits anticipated to be brought up to standard through this program. However, in i 1905 -06 only four loans were completed although several more are an process. All owners are lower income. i 1 i Slate low requires cities to offer lncentivna (including public improvements or density bonuses) to any project with at least 251 of the unite affordable to low and moderato income households. Several of the Planned Communities in Rancho Cucamonga contain ' 2 D Rental Rehab Loans Re.atal Rehab loans are given only to structures to be occupied solely by lower incomo renters. Rents after ' rehab may not exceed 301 of tenant Income. Five units were anticipated to be brought up to standard throLgh this Program during 1905 -86, but no loans were completed. In ordor to improve the porformance of the rehaUJltation loan progrem, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will undertake a publicity campaign to make eligible households and property owners aware of the programs and the possible benefits of participation. ' E. Section 8 Existing (or successor program) The City has entared a cooperation agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino to adminivtor the Section 0 Existing program. The goals reflect the reduced fundino for title program and the fact that rents in the City are often higher than Fair • market Rents. llowever, there is r good potential of using Section 0 Existing in the density bonus affordable housing to be produced an a part of the large planned developments under construction In the City. 1'. Article XXXIV Referendum Authority The vuters of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a referendum allowing public ownership or financing of low rent housing pursuant to Article XXXIV of the State Constitution. This enables use of public housing and various multi - family financing programs. There are currently eleven units of scattered site public housing In tho City. The City line entered into a Cooperation Agreement with the (lousing Authority of the County of San Bernardino for use of the Public Housing Program. No funding is •nticipat.ed for this program in the second Housing Assistl9Co Plan year. Ilowever, agreements a,o In place should funding become available. G. Affordable .lousing Incentives Slate low requires cities to offer lncentivna (including public improvements or density bonuses) to any project with at least 251 of the unite affordable to low and moderato income households. Several of the Planned Communities in Rancho Cucamonga contain ' 2 commitments for the development of affordable housing in the text of the approved or proposed Community Plan. The developor commits to develop a percentage of units at prices or rents affordable to lower Income housenol,%,, in exchange Lyr City Incentives. Redevelopment 202 of Tax Increnont funds from t:ie City's radavolopment pro;,ects will be used to assist low income housing development as necessary and as funds become available. 446.b CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a / • i w.� Jd4q Nile O � O € e dx4, 1. nrxly„ If k,n D Atleb roll R4ewd K MW P.da 1. WH& O -tober 16, 1906 W MAM", OCT : o 1980 Mr Herb Roberts arlcEOrrwEDiRteloR Comminit; Planning and Development Division U 5 Department of Housing and Urban Development ' Los Angeles Area Office - Region I% 1615 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90015 -301 ' Re Second Year Annual Goals Rancho Cucamonga Housing Assistance Plan D- 06 -MC -06 -0556 Deal Mr. Roberts: - ' Attached please find the second year annual goal for the Housing Assistance Plan fur the City of RL.1cho Cucamonga and the City Council's action approving the IIAP The goals and narrative reflec` past program accomplishments and the numbers are consistent with the ipproved three year Housing Assistance Plan (IIAP). The Annual Goal for 1906 -01 reflects the following estimates: (1) In the ',hree year HAP, we estimated that 73 additional hous :.,olds or 24 per year would be assisted under the Section 0 rent assistance program. We projected that seven of these would be elderly households, ten small families, and seven large famines. information from ' the San Oernardinn Coin.y Iiousing Authority indicates that we should achieve tills goal. Therefore, we have sed the same annual boat for next year. (2) The total number of units to be assisted in the COOG S ,,nior Repair Program exceeded the annual goal of 25 units We have seen a consistent participation rate for t this program for each of the past No years. Therefore we havt adopted the same annual goal for next year. However, .•e fell five units short of our goal of nine COOG repair loans to owners for 1905.06, although a number of loans were in progress but not completed at the end of the ;ear. We have adjusted the goal for this program because we anticipate that the planed public outreach program will increase participation. I 1 9320 OASEUUC ROAD, SIIffP, C. roST Or rice nox a07. PAHri R. CUCASInwOA, CAIJroRHIA 017 ". pta) tog 1931 1 ■ Hr. Rc: -rts October 15, 1906 Second Year Annual Goals Page 2 (3) The rental rehab program operated by San Bernardino County did not assist any units to Rancho Cucamonga last Year. however, we are hopeful that It wilt be successful In 1986 -07. The annual goal has been adjusted to reflect this. (4) The total number of units to be assisted under the cult{ - family rental revenue bond program has been continued at 35 affordable units (or 1G7 total units). This program has been very popular in the City. Several Projects have been approved but not completed We do not anticipate any problems meeting this goal (lines 1b and 10 of the three year RAP) If have any questions about there changes, please contact our onsulygant,// aura Hudson at (213) -SO1 -1061 or Otto Kroutil, Senior Planneq anilomnunity Development Coordinator at (714) 989 -1061. Thank you fo(( y consideration In this Otto ybut Senl /yY Pta OK ak Attachment I ., 1 i iCElrrt P I Q%TI ()h3 i iThe grantee certifies that: (a) It posscsscs legal autIKIrlty to make a grant submission and to execute a commmnity development and housing rrogram; i(b) Its governing body has drily adopted or pnsscd as V offieinl eel a resolution, motion or Similar action nutherixing lire person Identified as the off)eiN 'a represcntnlive of the grantee to submit the final slafemcnt and all �i undtrst andings arKi Gcurnncr.. contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person hlcntif(cd as the official reprccntalive of the grantee to act in i eoantetion with the submtc on of the final statement and to provide such additicf t information as may be require.,; i(c) Prior to submission of Its final statement to IIUD, tine grantee fins: (p met the citizen parltclpntlon requirements of S 570401(af(2) and has prov!ded citizens willn !A) the L"tima'c of the nmamt of CUDC funds proposed to be used for activities that will benefit Pelson of tow and moderate iIncome; and (D) Ns pinn for mhdmizing displacement or persons as a result or nclivrlles osslsled with CUUC fund: and to assist persons actually displaced as a ncsldl or such nctivities; i (2) prepared Its final statement of community development objectives and proJcrted use of funds in necordmirc with S 570.301(x)(3) and made the finnl statemeut availnblc to the pu:,lic; i(d) The grant will be conducted and administered In compliance with: (1) Title VI of tine Civil It 7gt:ls Act of IDG4 (pub, L. 80 -352; 42 U.S.C. 2000d i=.): And (2) 'rile VD1 of the Civil 111tiltla Act of 1066 (Pub. L. 90 -204; 42 U.S.C. 3601 i rl�1. c) It w111 af(nrmnliscly fur'hcr fair (rousing; February 1984 (f) It has dev •loped Its [irs: statement of projectea ice of runds so as to give mnximum feasible priority to activities wlnrh benefit low and moderate income families or all] In the prevention or d:ndnation of slums or blight! (lite Sirs'• statement of projected uses of futvts may also include activities which the j:rantrc certifies we designed to meet other community development needs having, a particular urgency bcrmr^ csistiry: conditions pose a serious and Immediate threat to tiles health or welfare of the community, and other fltuvtctul rcwurecs are tint ovallot,10; cxer,' that tj.c nggrcgnte use of CUpG Omds reecival ender section IOG of the Act mid, If nMdlicnble, under section 108 of the Act, th,rutg _ (n period specifiwl by the grantee consisting of 1, :, or 0 prorrnm years ?,, s�i(rincipaUy hrnefit )arsons of low end moderate income in a manner that ensurs ',tint not lees than SI percent of such funds are used for activities that benefit such persons during such period; (gj It Im:. developed it community developndcal pinn, for the period specified In parol•rnph (f) above, that Identifies community development and lauAng need! nw; specific: l.dh short and long -tern community development objectives that It, ve been ervetopttl In accordance with line primary objective and requirement: o' Inc Act; (it) It o ollnwmg n current Wiring orsislnnce pion which has been approved by IIUD pun.mnl to S 570.706: (I) ;I will not attempt to recover nny cnrilnl cots of public Inprovements Heisted in whole or In port with funds provided under section 106 of the Act or with amounts res.dtirg from a gunrnnlce under section 100 of the Act by Haesaltq' any amount against properties octned and occupied by persons of low and mojerole income, including mty fc^ chnrgcd or nssesshnenl made as a condition of nbin•n)tig access to such public ImprovcotcnCS, unless: (1) funds received dudder section 106 of llo Act are tcnl to pay the propurrion or such fee or nsscKment that relates to the capital costs of such public improvements that arc (nonced froi^ revenue sources other titan udder hlle I the Act; or (2) for purposes of nssess.nr any amount agnbrl properties owned my) occupied by jnrsons of low nail malrrate Income who me trot persons of low Income, tide rrnnlre certifies to the Secrclary Ilml it leeks suffl�ienl funds received under ;cclloa 106 of llte Act In cunnply wilb the rrdpnrt niters, if subparagraph (I); ant) (j) It will cnmph •vilh the other provisions of the Act stud with olhtr applicable laws 11 x.