Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1988/06/15 - Agenda Packet
E w %L CITY COUNCIL A G E N D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays — 7:30 p.m. June 15, 1988 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cecamonga •• City Couuellmembers Dennis L Stout, Afty" Pamela J Wright, Atan,nmrm Deborah N. B.•owu, co.,ru —bll Charles J. Buquet, co.,aa.,. -ee. Jeffrey King, co."tm. -sr. Lauren M. Wasserman, cta Af"w. James Markman. C,p Ano. +n Beverly A. Authelet, an ctr.e Cty Office: 089.1851 Libra Put 980 -3145 V City Council Agenda 1.114041,1 dune 15, 1988 PAGE 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. 2. Roll Call: Brown Buquet Stout _, King _, and Wr gi L _. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS;PRESENTATIONS 1. Announcement of the 1988 Bicentennial Poster Contest winners. Z. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They rill be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: May 25, 1988 2. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 6/1/88 and 6/8/88 and Payroll ending 5/26/88 for the total amount of $1,832,785.34. 3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the 'Notice 8 Invit;ng Bids' for the Area IL Hellman Storm Drain Improvement Projcct, from Monte Vista to Southern Pacific Railroad to be funded from Drainage Fund, Account No 23- 4637 -8763. I I RESOLUTION NO, 08 -379 A RESOL.iTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOPGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'AREA II HELLMAN STORM DRAIN FROM MONTE VISTA TO SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD', FUNDED FROM DRAINAGE FUND, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS m. i .y 44/414#/F City Council agenda June 15, 1988 PAGE ~` 2 4. Approval to change account number from SB 325/TDA Fund 13 Account No. 12- 4637 -8605 to Pedestrian Grants /Article 3 Account No. 16- 4637 -8717 for the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase 1I. S. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 14 Tract 11997, located on the southeast corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street, submitted by Nordic Development. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -380 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11597 6. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 16 Tract 13117, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of Banyan Street, submitted by Paragon Homes. RESOLUTION 90. 88 -381 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13117 7. Approval to execute a contract (CO 88 -380) for 18 consultant services to BSI Consultants, Incorporated, in the amount of $73,120 for production of a City -wide Traffic Control Device Inventory, to be funded from Gas Tax Fund Account No. 094637 -8780. 8. Approval to execute an agreement (CO 88 -081) for the 19 Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Gilbert 0. Wells and Barbara J. Neils and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Fiontage -. i Ieprovements at 6357 M. Archibald Avenue, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue between Highland Avenue and Lemon Avenue, for the Archibald Avenue Widening Pro,lec4, City Council Agenda June 15, 1988 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AM AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM GILBERT D. YELLS AND BARBARA J. WELLS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN yard and execute a Professional Services 88 -082) ulth Land /Plan /Design Group to cape Invontories, Nester netutification iken Avenue Median Islands and Parkways; !an Island; and Milliken Avenue Underpiss 'nates for a fee not to exceed $45,039 to he BeautlfIcation Fund, Account No. 21- additional 10% contingency allowance to for use under the approval of the City Approval to execute a contract (CO 88 -083) for design services relating to the updating of the City's Standard Plans and Development Specifications to J. F. Daviason and Associates, Incorporated, for the amount of $27,075 to be funded from Development Management Contract Services, Account No. 01- 4638 -6028. Approval to award and execute Professional Services Agreement (CO 88 -085) with Golden Coast Environmental Services, Incorporated, Irvine, California, for preparation of a City -wide street tree inventory and computerized tree manslgg1ement program in the amount of of $93.5005 to Obecofundedncfromfor Beatification riFund- Account No. 21- 4647 -8778, ApIroval to award Agrx a ent (CO 88- 086) a with Meyer and Ascociatel, Laguna Hills, California, the City Parks Facilities Retro -Fit Improvement Project, includes athletic equipment storage build ngs, trash dumpster enclosures, drive approaties, concrete paving, minor grading for drainage, fence repair, minor slope dralndge, concrete motistrips, and tree p1,,nters, in the amount of $20,500 plus a 10% contingency for a total appropriation of $22,550 to be funded frim the Parks Capital 01- 4547 -76t3, Improvement 4ccount No. yj City Council Agenda June 15, 1988 PAGE Y? 4 ,4 r 13. Approval tp award and execute a Professional Services 26 Agreement (CO 68 -084) between the City of Rancho ,i Cucamonga aid ASL Consulting Engineers for the preparation of design plans, contract specifications and engineer's estimate on the Church - Hermosa Storm Drain ;. '1 within Master Plan Watershed Area VI from approximately -, 360 4set north of 19th Street to the Church Street ^ Basin. The not -to- exceed fee of $79,435 plus 10% contingency will be funded from Drainage Fees, Account No. 23 -4637 -8761. ? 14. Noroval to accept improvements, release bonds and file 27 a Notice of Completion for 5810 Hallman Avenue. Faithful Performance Bond (Ctreet) $3,300 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -383 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 5810 HELLMA.N AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK ' 15. Approval to release bonds for Tract 9400, located on the 29 north side of Banyan Street east of Beryl Street. Rela— Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 525,000 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 2,500 16. Approval to release cash deposit for the foltowlnO: 30 Hill Williams Development corporation $ 628 Subdivision Sign for Tract 13066 M 8 S Residential Development $ 628 Subdivision Sign for Tract 12772 Lm is Development Company $500 and $ 2,500 Subdivision Sign and Sales Office for Tract 12364 -1 Lewis Development Company $ 21500 I Sales Trailer for Tract 9504 am 1 r A PAGE City Council Agenda I June 15, 1988 1 5 1- Approval to authorize the levy of an assessment surcharge for the expenses incurred in the collection of assessments in the Alta Loma Channel District (84 -2), the Sixth Street Industrial Park Refund District (82- 1R), the Rancho Cucamonga Drainage District (8G -2). RESOLUTION 110. 88 -384 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZINC THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARG2 FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 18. Approval of all 1987 -88 budgetary adjustments for the General, Capital Projects, Special Reserve Funds, and Agency Funds. 19. Approval to authorize a correction be made to a previous action with respect to the account numbe- charged for the Lion Street project to the Capital Reserve Fund, Account No. 25- 4285 -7043. 20. Approval to use the Rancho Cucamonga Neigh4orhoed Center as interim location of Emergency Operations Center (C.O.C.) 21. Approval to establish reimbursement from proceeds of financing in connection with acquisition of land, design and construction of facilities relating to the 99 acre Central Park. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -385 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING THAT PAYMENTS BE MADE BY THE CITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION OF LAND AND THE DESIGN 4ND CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES RELATING TO THE 99 ACRE CENTRAL PARK PROJECT ARE TO DE MADE IN ANTICIPATION OF REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A PLANNED LEASE FINANCING WITH CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO 31 33 39 40 43 4 .. PAGE City Council Agenda June 15, 1988 6 22. Set public hearing for July 20, 1988 - Approval to ,I 45 Deannex Tract Nos. 12402, 12365, 12672, and 12673 Work Program Areas (Terra vista Planned Coamunity) from Landscape Maintenance District No. 4. RESOLUTION R0. 88 -386 A RESOLUTICH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOdGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DEANNEXATION OF WORK PROGRAM AREAS OF TRACT NOS. 12402, 122365, 1£672 AND 12673 FROM LANDSCAPE MA:NTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 23. o•t public hearing for July 20, 1988 - Approval to Annex I 52 Pa,:el Map 9504, located at the northeast colvor of Base Line Road, and Haven Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 as Annexation No. 8. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -387 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPRCvAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -388 OF THE CITY ING ITS INTENTION TO ORI iTION TO LANDSCAPE MAIN T NO. 4 AN ASSESSMENT DI DING SAID ANNEXATION AS Ah. TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE I: PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAP G ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING CE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS T 24. Set public hearing for July 20, 1988 - Approval to Annex i 60 OR 87 -41, located west of Utica Avenue, south of Arrow Highway and CUP 87 -42, located on the southeast corner of 8th Street and Cleveland Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 21. Mimi, PAGE City Council 8Igenda June 15, 1988 ? RESOLvrION NO. 88 -389 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 21 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -390 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION YO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE 'SAINTEHANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 21 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHT:NG ACT OF 1977 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 25. Set public hearing for July 20, 1988 - Approval to Annax OR 87 -41, located wr.st of Utica Avenue, south of Arrow Highway and CUP 87 -42, located on the southeast corner of 8th Street and Cleveland Avenue, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 17. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -391 A RESOLUTIOi OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 17 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -392 A RESOLUTION OF THL CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 17 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. G. PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 70 mgge � '... D. CONSF4T ORDINANCES City Council Agenda June 15, 1988 The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Srcond readings are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time- without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRTCT mat request to ing units per ac ing units per ac. ng Overlay District acres of land, loc Roa', west of Arcl with the Senior a base district for south side of Base - APN 208 - 031 -18, ORDINANCE N0. 351 (second reading) IRDIWICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE f OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ROVING A REQUEST TO AMEND THE 'LOPMENT DISTRICT MAP, ODA 87 -05, FROM -MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -3 DWELLING S PER ACRE) TO HIM RESIDENTIAL (24- WELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ATTACHED WITH SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT D) FOR A 5.05 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, WEST OF ISALD AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FORNIA, AND MANE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT ACREEMCNi 87 -02 - NOURSE DEYELOPMEN- - A eve opment graement etween the City of ancho Cucamunga and Hourse Development for the purpose of providing a Senior Housing Project per the requirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District (Section 27.20.040 of the Development Code, Ordinance 211) for 170 apartment units to be located on the : ith side of Base Line Riad, wast of Archibald Avenge - .dN 208 -031- 18, 19. PAGE! 8 80 -.s2_ El PAGE , + City Council Agenda June I5, 1988 9 ORDINANCE 110. 356 (second reading) A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO Cl APPROVING MAT I 'DEVELOPMENT AGREEM CITIZENS' HOUSIM( PROPERTY LOCATED SOI WEST OF ARCNIBALD A RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING THE MAYI ON BEHALF OF THE CI1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 :69--- GER'1re°(gb —FN .TMEtit r3�( equnst to amend the Development D str ets ap rom Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to Office Professional for 1.69 acres of land, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road - APN 208- 031 -17, 54, 55, 56 and 57. ORDINANCE NO. 352 (second reading) A ORDINANCE OF CITY OF RANCH APPROVING A LOiI-NEDIUN RESIDENTIAL UNITS PER ACRE) TO OFF FOR A 1.69 ACRE PPRCEL WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD f BASE LINE ROAD, RANC CALIFORNIA, AND MAKE FINE THEREOF 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT lMMMENT Nl -11 - JAMES E. CARTER - A request to amend e Development str cts —Fap #Foa Office /Professional (OP) to Neighborhood =er:ial (NC) for approximately 3.45 acres of land, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue - APN 208 - 202 -13, 14. 98 100 7 City Council a enda June 15, 1988 ORDINANCE NO. 353 (second reading) AM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL (OP) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) FOR 3.68 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTiMFST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HELL14FN AVENUE - APR 208- 202 -13, 14 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND 6EP6, n. _ ? development 4greemen and reque amend t—Tie Devolopnent District Map from "OP" (r,fffce /Professional) to "NC" (Neighborhood Commercial) with 3.58 acres of lend located at the southwest corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue - APN 202 - 151 -33. ORDINANCE NO. 354 (second reading) A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL (OP) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) FOR 3.58 ACRES OF 'LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOMITA COURT AND ARCIIIBALD AVENUE - APN 202 -15133 ORDINANCE NO. 357 (seLiid reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CO;YCIL Ur THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THAT DOCUMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO 67 -03 CONCERNING PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCIIIBALD AVENUE AND LOMITA COURT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA" AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE SAME ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA 4. PAG13 City Council Agenda June 15, 1988 11 nc ruunrc ucrcwrncn, A request to prezone a port on of the San Bernardino County unincorporated area ffar anne.iation purposes) to Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units oar acre) located north of Highland Avenoo, south of Summit Avenue extension, east of Peer Creek utility corridor, and west Of the County /City boundary - APH 225- 161 -19, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, ;8, 49, 53, 55, and 61. ORDINANCE 110. 355 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING (PREZONE) THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP TO THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF LOW RESIDENTIAL TO THE PROPERTIES LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF SUMMIT AVENUE E %TENSION, EAST OF THE DAY CREEK UTILITY CORRIDOR, AND WEST OF THE COUNTY /CITY BOUNDARY - APH 225 -161- 19, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55, AND 61 E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Inc following items have been adgertise4 and/or posted as pubtfc hearings as required by law. , The chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SIGN ORDINANCE AIIENDHEKT 88-01-mtITTOF RANCHO CUCAMONGA --Various amen men the 519A UAInance regarding neon signs and window signs. ORDINANCE NO. 358 (first reading) AN ORDINANCF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 88 -01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR NEON AND WINDOW SIGNS AND ADDING 'ROY14ION FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS FOR CITY ;PONSORED SPECIAL EVENTS 1107 108 PAGE City Council 6genda June 15, 1900 12 L. ENVI'3NMENTAL fS5E5SNEM ANO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88- 2 U reques to amen t e an Use Element of t(ie- eneral Plan from Medium Residential 1(8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential 4 -8 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 15 acres of land, located north of Highland Avenue, south of Lemon Avenue extension, and west of Deer Creek Channel - APN Portions of 207- 271 -34 and 41, and 201- 271 -42. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -393 A RESOLUTION OF THE CI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN APPROVING GENERAL PLAN 88 -02A, REQUESTING TO PLAN LAND USE MA? FROM TO LOW- MEDIUM RE APPROXIMATELY 11; ACRES NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVER, AVENUE EXTENSION, AND U CHANNEL, RANCHO CUCAM APN PORTIONS OF 201 -27 EXHIBIT •A -) AND 20L• FINDING: IN SUPPORT THEi o -v1 A�A61A wt131KU611Un - A request to amend the Development OTStr1ct Designstfon of Medium Residential (8 -14 dwellinq units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 15 acres, located at the north side of Highland Avenue, south of Lemon Avenue extension ano west of Deer Creek Channel - APR Portions of 201 - 271 -34 and 41, and 201 - 271 -42. CROINANCE NO. 359 (first reading) ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORN . ROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENUM -u7 01 REQUESTING .0 AMEND THE DISTRICT [ORATION FROM NEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO - MEDIUM RFSIDENTIAL FOR 15 ACRES OF ) LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, [H OF IEY.Od AVENUE EXTENSION, AND WEST THE DEER CREEK CHANNEL, RANCHO IMONGA, CALIFORNIA, - APN PORTIONS OF 271 -34 AND 41 (SEE EXHIBIT •A•) AND 101- 271 -42 130 PAGE City Council Agenda June 15, 1980 13 3. CONSIDERATION TO VACATE VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR I 149 n'7 _ [ € MID DR I I I I I I RESOLUTION NO. 68 -394 l• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE y' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING IfS INTENTION TO VACATE VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR TWO DRIVEWAYS ON JASPER STREET AND AN EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ON LOMITA AVENUE 4. EtAIRONMEHTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 154 CITY OF G - n ame lent to Section ,0 .0 0- , 17.12.030-B. and the addition of Section 17.10.050 -0 of the development Code pertaining to the parking and storage of vehicles on privatq property in the Residential, Commercial and Industrial Districts. ORDINANCE NO. 360 (first reading) OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ELOPMENI CODE AMENDMENT 80- SUBSECTION 17.08.070 C AND AND 'ADDING A MEN SUBSECTION TO THE DEVELOPML CODE THE PARKING AND STORAGE OF 'RIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL /OFFICE AND 5 ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PRGCFEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF I 185 )IMSHENTS VITHIN IMPROVEMtNY ' bi3Tktt7- Pu. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -395 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT Di STRICT 85 PO S. M � PAGE �. 90 a` City Council Agenda .. yi d ° `' ` June 15, 1988 14 «>fi ��• 6. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AMD GENERA!. PLAN AMENDMENT 196 ' 89- CITY AMC - An amen pent to A we Land 'se tleglent for the following parcels ti- within the Victoria Community Plan area: from Low - K"" Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to Low (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) APH 227- 411 -75; from Medium (8 -14 dwelling edits per acre) to Low - Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) APN 227- 091 -9, 26 49, 50; from,ledium (8 -14 dwelling units per acre to Mediue -Nigh (14 -24 dwelling unit, per acre) APN y( 227- 091 -18 throrgh 22, 25, 43; from Medium (8 -14 V d:celling units per acre) to Low - Medium (408 dwelling units per acre) APN 227 - i11-1, 33, 38; and S; from Neighborhood Commercial to Medium Residential 4, (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) - APN 227 - 171 -19 d, .e RESOLUTION NO. 88 -396 •r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 88- 02C AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAT: FOR PARCELS WITHIN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: FROM LOW - MEDIUM (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW (2 -4 DWELLINGS UNITS PER ACRE) APR 227- 411 -75; FROM MEDIUM (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) APN 227- 091-9, 26, 49, 50; FROM MEDIUM (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM -HIGH (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) APH 227- 091-18 THKOUGH 22, 25, 43; FROM MEDIUM N Di UM PER D(4-8 IDWELLIING UNITS PER TO LOW- UNITS 227- 111 -1, 33, 38; AND FROM NEIGHBORHOOD _ COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 OWEL.:NG UNITS PER ACRE) APH 227- 171 -19 I ` � ,1 i 7p PAGE r5 ?r City Courcil Aganda June 15, 1988 IS I D,L�S,SME:�4AMD pEYELOPNENT DISTRI_C7 209 aaen Dent to a an9e eve opment MD�itrt t designations as they currently exist to Victoria Planned Community (Y,P.C.) for eleven areas within the Victoria Planned Community - APN 227 -0'1 -8 thru 11; 227- 091 -4. 45, 56; 227 - 411 -75; 227- 091 -9. 26, 49, 50; ?27- 091 -30 thru 22, 25, 431 227 - 111 -1. 33, O;ard 7 227 - 171 -21 7 227 - 211 - 74285 39; 229 - 021 -58; 227 - 211 -3, 30 ORDINANCE NO. 361 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF I-HE CITY OF RANCHO WWI �EHA^ OYIHG pEYELOPNN DISTRICT ANHDlFT NO. 88 -02, A REQUEST TO CHANGE DEVELOPNEW DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS AS THEY CURRENTLY EXIST, TO VICTORIA PLANNED E V CN WITHIN PLANNED COLHUNITYY AREAI 227 -011 -08 THROUGH 11; 227 - 091 -04, 45, 56; 22/•411 -75; 227- 091 -09, 26, 49, 5o; 227- 091 -18 THROUGH 22, 25. 43. 227 -111- 01, 33, 38; 227 - 171 -19; 227- 161 -10, 24, 25; 227 -111 -27, 30; 227- 171 -21; 227 -211- 07, 28, 39; 229 - 021 -50; AND 227- 211 -03, 30 C. ENYIRONNENTAL ASSESSHEUT AND VICTORIA PLANNED 221 nu M��w - en amenuml" to annexT-I areas into tie ctorta Planned Comounfty - APN 227 -011 -8 thru 11. 227- 091 -4. 45, 46; 227 - 411 -7S; 227- 091 -9. 26. 49. 50; 227 - 091 -18 thru 22, 25, 43, 227••111 -1. 33. 38; 227 - 171 -19, 227 - 161 -10, 24, 25 and 227- 111 -27, 30 and P27- 171 -21; 227 - 211 -7, 28, 39;229- 021 -58; 227 - 211 -3, 30. l I i I ICity Council Agenda PAGE, June 15, 1988 16 ORDINANCE NO. 362 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED CONMUNITY AMENDMENT 08 -02, AN AMENDMENT TO ANNEX ELEVEN (11) AREAS VI'HIN THE VICTORIA COYJiUNITY AREA TO THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY - APN 227- 011 -08 THROUGH 11. 227 - 019 -04, 45, 46; 227- 411 -75; 227 -091- 09, 26, 49, 50; 227- 091 -18 THROUGH 22, 25, 43; 227 - 11141, 33, 38; 227- 171 -091- 19; 227 - 161 -10, 24, 25; 227 - 111 -27, 30; 227 - 171 -21; 227- 211 -7, 28, 39; 229 -021- 58, AND 227 - 211 -3, 30 7. EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO AC DIRE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY 241 AI` G P OF STREET IMPROVEMEW THE CWTR TI FOR THE mb STREET Al JL AS KW -2U-- 111-06 A14D N 2- - 6. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -397 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN VORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 8. HEARING AND PASSING UPON OBJECTIONS OR PAOTESTS IF ANY 248 WHICH MAY BE RAISED B ,UIY R Y OYN R OT R c FD N U POR F. STREET, N HO .' GR IN ACCORDANCE 68 W H CHAFiER I NE E J ACT Of 1911. lKA a 4 PAGE City Council Agenda Juno 15, 1980 17 RESOLUTION NO. 084198 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT 6705 AMETHYST STREET, APH NO, 202- 111 -16 AND 9529 19T111 STREET, APN NO. 292 - 111 -16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS SECTION 5870 THRU 5880 MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 9. ORDERING T4E WORK IN CONNECTION WITH: A. ANNEXATION NO. 29 FOR TRACT N0. 13644 LOCATED ON 252 fR�EAS F.)*AFIG��I U ND E H ID S�1TISiR IE TTt L TR T H N MAINTENANCE D STRICT ll, 2. RESOLUTION NO. 88-399 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK Ill CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 29 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT 13425 B. ANNEXATION NO. 47 FOR TRACT NO. 13644 LOCATED ON 2e9 lF1TE E'�i�`Tb��l EIUI S NUE D THE U 5 D 11T�o 1��iR�I E'� 0 L MU C NTE HC WLbIKIt;I W, 1-___ RESOLUTI01 NO. 80 -400 A RESOLUTION OF THE L,TT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE WORI IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0, 47 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT 13644 ANNEXATION N0. 45 FOR TRACT N0. 13644 PARCEL MAP 265 d�D ! rrdr- ID U I US LULAFIOHS THROUGHOUT H CITY) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE TEEN CE DISTRICT-N . City Council Agenda June 15, 1988 18 ' RESOLUTION N0. 88 -401 P A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE d). CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ro ORDERING THE YORK IH CONNECTION WITH x ANNEXATION NO. 45 TO STREET LIGHTING >' F:. MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FIhAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0, 13644, PARCEL NAP 9504, OR 86 -32 (LOT 5, TRACT 12176), AND CUP 8, -04 ; D. ANNEXATION N0, 20 FOR CUP 67 -OC DR 86 -32 (LOT 5, 215 5` I NDU OM ER N ASP H TRICT flu.3. — 7 RESOLUTION 110. 08 -402 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE YORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 20 TO LANDSCAPE + MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR CUP 87- 04, DR 86 -32, (LOT S. TRACT 12176) E. ANNEXATION N0, 16 FOR CUP 87 -04 DR 86 -32 ILDT 5. 283 TRACT 1 N TR1 AL /CONMERCI �TiT'i 6H NU HAINTRANCE WbIKILI KU. 6. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -403 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAL',FOPNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 16 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR CUP 87- - 04, OR 86 -32 (LOT 5, TRACT 12176) F. ANNEXATION N0. 8 FON PARCEL NAP N0. 9504 LOCATED pgl CIN'- N 7 E RN IGH NG N E N0, D RI I . 4. S,l r 'A S Y' r_ Sh.9•' S' i PAGE � City Council Agenda June 15. 1988 11 _ RESOLUTION NO. 88 -404 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING HE�FINALEENG ENGINEER'S REPORT REPORTNDFOR C PARCEL MAP 9504 10. PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 1988 -89 BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF 5' I F. PUBLIC HEARINGS The followipg items have no legal publication or posting y I requirements, The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No (teas submitted. S. CITY NANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The testi I rny, although do he Chair legal y mayope require the ■ meeting gfor public inaut. 1. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 6797 HELLMAN AVENUE- RESOLUTION NO. 88 -405 A RESOLUTICH OF THE CITY CC4jNC1L OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF THE LORD HOUSE, LOCATED AT 6797 HELLMAN AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK - APN 202- 061 -12 HISTORIC LANDHAVK DESIGNATION OF 7165 ETIWANDA AVENUE - APH 2Z7 -131 -7 298 Y9S 320 �tro� O N I y -�' : a . - PAGE° City Council Agenda June 15, 1988 20 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -406 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE FISHER HOUSE. LOCATED AT 7165 ETIWAMOA AVENUE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK 3. HISTCRIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION OF THE SEDGE BOG 345 T D Y Y N- N -0 -I5. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -407 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SEDGE BOG ECOLOGICAL PRESERVE LOCATED AT DAY CANYON, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST 4. HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION 01 THE 359 bLAWWALILK HULK FILL. -- RESOLUTION NO. 88 -408 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST •J` TO DESIGNATE THE SCHOWALTER ROCK PILE LOCATED BETWEEN VISTA GROVE AND WILSON, 660 FEET EAST OF HERMOSA, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. AS POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST •J• S. HAVEN AVENUE NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD- 376 6CiERMiNATTO�A L I GN.KTWr—FTR—LUF=- - LtW15 C M Y - A staff request for City rouncil direction concerning the reclignment of a driveway onto Haven Avenue from the Terra Vista Town Center Shopping Center, located betwstn Foothill Boulevard and Town Center Drive. APN 1077- 421 -05. 1"91' �9 f0 ial NH COUNCIL BUSINESS PACE City Council Agenda June 15, 19x8 21 The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing Items, altnough the Chair may open the meeting for puhltc input. No items submitted. I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next mating. J. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council my receive testimony and sat the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per Individual. K_ADJOURMMENT Meeting to adjourn to June 28, 1988 at 6:00 p.m., Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Liao Road, Rancho Cucamonga for the continuance of the 1988 -89 fiscal year budget hearing. I, Beverly A. Authetet, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 10, 1988, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per A.B. 2674 at 9320 -C Base Line Road. M 1 ti 6- 1 -68 LIST OF W49/ANTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 1 PAYEE ---------------------------------- "--- III DESCR - - - - -- -------------------------'------»-------------- WARRB NARR.AhT. 4- CHECKS OVERL P 1731 ANNA GILES REFWO FOR LAS VEGA! TRIP PO $ -10- 23017- •Qi0 0 23016 - 24074 667 VISA 4620 -oofs -alts -5101 P C OTHER ITEMS 24074' -1,426 40 24076 - 2404! 1730 VITO•S ITALIAN DELICATESSEN SAMD41CHIS BOGT MTG PO 5/25/66 2409.. 49.60 632 RONDA SULLIVAN PETTY CASH PAID 51211 C DINER ITEMS 24095• 425 12 634 1 C M A GREAT DIFERREO COME MAY 26 1966 PO 5/27 240964 393.46 144 WESTERN SAVINGS DEFERRED COW 5/26188 PAYROLL 240919 3,660.00 24096 24099 1 A A EOUSPMENT RENTALS CO., INC. ROLLER /TRAILERS /CHAINS /B/NOERS 24100 177.00 211 A P T ALARM SYSTEMS SERVICE APR /MAY /JWE C OTHER ITEMS 24701 2,772.90 a A C.E OFFICE SUPPLIES ZIPPY SIGN /T26 C OTHER ITEMS 24102 23 11 1710 ACTION SUPPLY INC 5-3 CUTTERS C OTHER ITEMS 24103 205.60 1095 STWEN ALIEN CONTRMCC SERVICES 24104 314.20 ITO1 Af PLE50Y PLUMBING OVERPAYPENT BUSINESS LICENSE 24105 8.31 619 ART ARAGON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL 5121 24106 20.00 26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS FOOTHILL IMPR. PLAN N OF RAMONA 2-107 640.00 402 AUTO RESTORATORS R C R ARM REST C OTHER ITEFS 24106 733.42 1111 8 L R BUSINESS C LEGAL REPORTS SUBSCRIPTION FROM 6188 TO 0/89 24109 257.25 641 BANK OF AMERICA DEBT SERVICE 64Y2., C OTHER ITEMS 24110 614,701.20 1101 EDYTHE BARNETTE WEEK ENDING B/T XARY C OTHER ITEMS 24111 926.64 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE AUTOMOTIVEICRIME PREVENTION 24t12 46.13 1052 ANN BEYER HISC CRAFT SUPPLIES FOR APRIL 24113 19.73 1169 BOETHINO TRff LAND FAFMS IN VARIOUS FLAN? MATERIA C OTHER ITEMS 14114 2,120 46 IJBI JOHN BOLIA MINT. C JANITORIAL MAY JANITORIAL 24115 412.00 186 C.I.A ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS CVFRTIRE INSPECTION -SSLN C HAVEN 2016 256.00 1716 CAL CO PRODUCTS INC. GVERPAYHENT BUSINESS LICENSE 24117 9! 40 1712 CAL TRANS MAIS 24110 11.72 1711 CALIFORNIA STATE DIVISION OF EARtMGUAKE LIT4RATURE 24119 67.50 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE TRAFFIC COMES C OTHER ITEMS 24'20 1,122 08 570 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OVf RPAY Mf MT ON B3IFA PN 209- 411 -17 24121 7,089.92 14 CITY RENTALS POILER SINGLE DRUM VI C OTHER ITEMS 24122 754.60 110'0 KERRY CRABTREE DISPATCH CLASSES 24123 -950.9] OS CUCAMONGA CO NATEM DIST R VICTORIA WINDROW l0 C OTHER ITEMS 24124 5, 71a 32 65 CUCAhONGA CO NAIER DIST VICTORIA PARK LN LMOS C DINER ITEFS 24125 2.609.29 87 CUCAMONGA PRINTING PLOT PLANNER BRUKS 24126 286.20 431 J.F. OAVTOSON ASSOCIAIFS, INC. JAN 2S THAOU4H FEB 26 C OTHER ITEMS 24127 3,156.60 716 DE ARMOND CONSTROCTIDN FROG PAYMENT NO 3 FTI CUBBLFSTOIJE 24128 2,089.25 60 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF CENTAL INS JUNE GROUP K 4566 2.129 B,C14.82 6- 1 -86 LIST OF WARRANTS t PAYEE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 2 DESCR WARIN WARR.AHT. INES MOBILE NOME PARA 24130 46.06 OFFICIAL 5/21 24131 2C.00 SOFTBALL TOURNEY $115 -5/26 24132 134.00 CONTRACT 241)) 149.96 IN LINE19100 ARROW WY 24134 61.00 AN FILE C OTHER ITEMS 24131, 620.63 ENT BUSINESS LICENSE 24136 94.75 E SUMMER 1906 24137 521.04 IT LATERAL EX C OTHER ITEMS 24138 2,676.00 OFFICIAL 5/20 24139 15.n0 S SERVICES FOR JAN at 24140 1,800.30 EST NO 4 SCL C OTHER ISM 24141 30,014.30 NUTSETTER C OtMER 1TENf 24142 8.72 VALVE ADAPT 24143 60.34 NT BUSINESS LICENSE 24544 10.00 NEWSLETTER SUPPER ARTWOAK 24145 21,359.00 TENT NO 2 BASELINE WIDENING 24146 167,567.56 EFUND PERMIT 2849 24147 1.502.00 NO 4 ARCH AVE REALtONFENT 24148 30.053.11 E MONUMERTATION TRIIST7 24149 1,550.00 Lt CAtIAFAKBIST IECHNICUES 2JISO 11.95 12 TO 6/27/6 C OTHER ITEMS 24151 41.6C NT BUSINESS LICENSE 24:52 20.00 ANCE CHAR OES 24153 31.52 ICES AENDERED 24164 1,949.50 OFFICIAL 5/15 C 5110 24155 45.00 OFFICIAL 5/18 TO 6126 24166 100.00 INTERN PAYMENT 2415T 370.00 EVENUE SOURCES "GMT 24158 440.00 1988 C OTHER ITEPS 24159 4.490.50 IVNTERS RAh PACKS RECEPTOR 24160 8, "87.60 LLL CHECK E70 F SC OTHER ITEPS 24162 398.69 I 24143 31.58 E GROUP 61236 24164 43620 IULAR 80030 C OTHER ITIa4 24165 350.85 OFFICIAL 6128 4,66 25.00 '.AL INS GROUP 1607 24147 21,618.09 PHONE 6/88 TO 9158 24168 213.06 TRONPENTAL ASST SPENT 24149 11,405.00 RSHIP DUES RAT 80.69 24.10 BS 00 107 OETCD PS 20 DAVID DICK so SO 0317 6PIC 640 ONil(Al REPRODUCTIONS SF J+ SSE DYMO -ROO ICA), INC CLI L $23 EASTMAN, IhC SAI 1713 F LCONER INSULATION C DRYWALL OVI 9B FORD PRINTING C TAILING INC OR, 3150 0 P S CONSULTING CIVIL E'NGIMEEPS TUI 364 TONI GARCIA SOF 671 HACKETT C KRAN7ER, INC. SUI 1056 HOVEY ILE L1` INC. PRC 161 S.M. HOYT LU48�9 CO. HOME CENTER MAC 495 NYORD -SCAPE PRODUCTS �l INC SUF 3114 I. A. CONSTRUCSION SOPPANY OVE 999 INLAND LITHO GRA 1119 J.E C. CONSTRUCTION PAC 1709 KEIX -CO BUILDERS DEP 193 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO PRO 1104 TERRACE LANE C ASSOCIATES RFF Q 1703 LERM PUBLICATIONS ORO / 200 LOS ANGELES TIMES SER 1706 SPIKE LYNCH AND ASSOCIATES OVE 1062 M C I TELECOMMUNICATIONS Loh 71 MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROS 009 JASON ICYER SOF' 602 PAT MEYER $OF 1143 CHEARICC MULLGRAV W81 1101 NATIONAL RECAEATIGN C PAFK 4SSOC PAC: 231 MINIX INC. RENO 1160 NEWPORT TRAFFIC ST60IES Tn., 1416 OMEGA SYSTEMS SUPPLY OIA, 235 OMEN ELECTRIC SER4 997 P I P PRINTING DRUG 791 P.M.I. OENTA, HEALTH PLAN DENT 468 PAC TEL PACT 1139 HENRY PADILLA SOFT 1004 PAATNERS WEALTH PLAN JUNE 272 PITNEY $ONES POST 1207 PLANN140 NETWORK PAST 7115 PPOFESStOMAL GPOUhDS MANAGEMENT PGKS RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 2 DESCR WARIN WARR.AHT. INES MOBILE NOME PARA 24130 46.06 OFFICIAL 5/21 24131 2C.00 SOFTBALL TOURNEY $115 -5/26 24132 134.00 CONTRACT 241)) 149.96 IN LINE19100 ARROW WY 24134 61.00 AN FILE C OTHER ITEMS 24131, 620.63 ENT BUSINESS LICENSE 24136 94.75 E SUMMER 1906 24137 521.04 IT LATERAL EX C OTHER ITEMS 24138 2,676.00 OFFICIAL 5/20 24139 15.n0 S SERVICES FOR JAN at 24140 1,800.30 EST NO 4 SCL C OTHER ISM 24141 30,014.30 NUTSETTER C OtMER 1TENf 24142 8.72 VALVE ADAPT 24143 60.34 NT BUSINESS LICENSE 24544 10.00 NEWSLETTER SUPPER ARTWOAK 24145 21,359.00 TENT NO 2 BASELINE WIDENING 24146 167,567.56 EFUND PERMIT 2849 24147 1.502.00 NO 4 ARCH AVE REALtONFENT 24148 30.053.11 E MONUMERTATION TRIIST7 24149 1,550.00 Lt CAtIAFAKBIST IECHNICUES 2JISO 11.95 12 TO 6/27/6 C OTHER ITEMS 24151 41.6C NT BUSINESS LICENSE 24:52 20.00 ANCE CHAR OES 24153 31.52 ICES AENDERED 24164 1,949.50 OFFICIAL 5/15 C 5110 24155 45.00 OFFICIAL 5/18 TO 6126 24166 100.00 INTERN PAYMENT 2415T 370.00 EVENUE SOURCES "GMT 24158 440.00 1988 C OTHER ITEPS 24159 4.490.50 IVNTERS RAh PACKS RECEPTOR 24160 8, "87.60 LLL CHECK E70 F SC OTHER ITEPS 24162 398.69 I 24143 31.58 E GROUP 61236 24164 43620 IULAR 80030 C OTHER ITIa4 24165 350.85 OFFICIAL 6128 4,66 25.00 '.AL INS GROUP 1607 24147 21,618.09 PHONE 6/88 TO 9158 24168 213.06 TRONPENTAL ASST SPENT 24149 11,405.00 RSHIP DUES RAT 80.69 24.10 BS 00 Ai 1 r /.4 6- 1 -66 LIST OF WARRANTS R, CMO CUCAIOMOA PACE 3 ?,nv" PAYEE ITEM DISCS WARPS WARR.AMT• ---------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPL'I MAT 46 STARSURST C OTHER ITEMS 24171 69.90 966 PURKISS.ROSE ASSOCIATES CONSULTATION WITH CITY STAFF 24172 4,166.10 60 RAINBOW PHOTO LAS E0-36 C OTHER ITEMS 24113 13.76 TO MANCHU CUCMONGA CLAMBER DUES 24174 60.00 607 RANCHO CUCMONGA TROPHY C GIFT 1ST 20 3N0 PLACE TROPHI£S 24175 E01.36 1092 MARK RAID SOFTBALL OFFICIAL 5/16 TO S 128 24176 65.02 606 RECOGNITION EOUIPNCNT REPLACE COPPUSCAN CONTRACT A11246E 24177 450.00 _ 172 AITI CAMERA , "NTEPS 196 -4756 TK 13544 C OTHER ITEMS 24176 89.59 iY 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINT PAPER C OTHER ITEMS 24179 161.39 1716 FRED BOTH TREE CARE CONSULTATION OF OEA711 OF TA6E3UTA 24180 100.00 1137 AUDELL HELM AMERICAN TRUST JUNE HEALTH INSURANCE GROUP 81041 24181 13,570.50 320 S C L M COMPANY APR B6 IRRIGATION REP C OTHER ITEMS 24112 674.72 1063 SAN AN16MIC COMMUNITY HOSPITAL RL LINDANE SHAMPOO 14183 20.65 261 SAM 6ERN CO PRINTING C MIL SVC MP SERVICES PROVIDED C OTHER ITEMS 24184 FC4.90 301 SAN BERN CO SPERIFFS PAYMENT FOR JUNE 24165 394 950.00 1706 SANTA ANA POLICE DEPARTPENT CCFOA TRAINING CONFERENCE 24IN 60.00 1615 JOHN SANTOS OFFICIAL FOR SOFTBALL TOURNEY 24167 250.00 1141 SCHARFF C SCHARFF TWO MOSAIC LOGOS 24156 1, IOD.00 317 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOISON CO. 1130 SPRUCE C OTHER ITEMS 24189 924.83 �E 317 SOUTHERN CA'IFDRMIA EDli CN CO. 34 KLVSMM- WILSDN SPR C OTHER 17CMS 24190 47,319.20 317 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ME GO AAC419ALl/I.RTN C OTHER ITEMS 24191 1,fAE.9T 319 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OAS COMPANY 903 9TH STIIEET..ry,, C OTHER ITEMS 21192 66.06 397 SOUTMEFN DATA SYSTEMS ORE MONTH SERVICE CONTRACT 24193 984 35 1705 STRACHOTA INSURANCE AGENCY RACM524A531-FROM 613188 TO 5/3/B9 24194 594.94 1659 SYMPRO INC PIS SUPPORT CONTRACT (ANNUAL) 24195 900.00 471 TRICO REPLACE CIRCUIT BREAK C OTHER ITEMS 24196 TS.OD 424 UNITED PACIFIC CORPOPATIOY CITY WIDE STREET TREE MAINT CONTRAC 24197 14 336.00 667 VISA ACCT N 4520 0056 8116 C OTHER ITEMS 24198 1�136.6T 46T L.A. WAINS GATT C ASSOL, INC. PROGRESS BILLING THIRD PLAN CHECK 24199 327.50 47A CARL WARREN C CO CLAIMANT THOMAS F OIL C OTHER ITEMS 24200 459.36 756 WELDING INDUSTRIAL C TOOL SUPPL 6100 3" EM PLUGS 242C1 121.70 961 SHARON C WILLIAPS SECRETARIAL SERVICES 24202 -310.00 SD9 XEROX CORPORATION PAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 24203 611 56 TOTAL CHECAS 1449,407.63 Ai 1 a ) 3 6- 8.88 LIST OF WARRANTS RANCHO CUCAMCNOA PAGE 1 PAYEE ------------------------------------------------- ITEM OESCR " ------------------- --- ------------- MARRY WARR.AMT. --------- .. CHECK; OVERLAP 1640 CALIF. CHEMICAL DISPOSAL DRUM LOAD SERVICE CALL / P0 6/181.8 27781• - 420.00 23182 - 23920 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE "ARDNARE CREDIT FR38 INV. $ 64 C DIMES ITEMS 27921• .67.82 37971 - 23924 752 COCMRAN L MICHOIS, INC. ElAOE PALO 6/25/86 23940. -13.12 27941 - 2420) TO RANCHO CUCAXONGA CHAMBER DINNER RESEPVATION /DEBOMM GROAN 24.04• 73.OD 1163 STATE OF CALIFOI:1A TP.E.R.S.1 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE i /1- 12/31/67 24205. 288.34 24206 661 ACE LOCK C KFT S /SID KEY $29 679 77';0.3 AKgE SPRING INSTRUCTOR 05100,01,07.6300 24205 2t7.55 1095 STEVEN ALLiN 20 HOURS CONTRACT SERVICES 24209 774.20 954 APPLE COMPUTER, INC. 2NB MINOR',' EXPANSION L OTHER ITEMS 21210 446.06 519 ART ARAGON ADDITION TO SOFTBALL MRS 5/16 -5/21 24211 105.00 1146 LIZ ARAGON SPRING INSTRUCTOR CLASS $ 5602 24212 413.82 IfiSS TRICIA ASMLY HILEAGE REI"URSCHEMT 24713 6.T8 26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS BASELINE CONSTRUCTION C OTHER ITEMS 24214 6,204.00 1227 ASSOCIATION 9F UCC90S MNAGERS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 24215 95.00 402 AUTO RESTORATORS REPAIR LEFT DOOR /HINGE /REFINISH 24216 139.76 1107 EDYTHE GARNETTE WEEK ENDING 6 /14 -ALLO C OTHER ;TENS 24217 1,458.00 73 BASELINE TRUE VALUE MARCWARE CREDIT FROM ENV $5405 C OTHER IIEHS 24218 42L60 $55 KINGSLEY DEWEFIEID SPRING INSTRUCTOR CLASS $ 6250 24219 167 30 925 DAVE BIEVINS TUITION PEIBURSEMEMT 24)20 750.00 685 BRUNSWICK MAVEN MILLS BOWL CLASS $ 6120,11 27 23 SPRING ]24570 24221 TOY 40 561 BU;a, FLOTO SPRlNO INSTRUCTOR LASS 0 6100 -6600 24222 2,660 42 552 $DRS, ROSEANN SPRING INSTRUCTOR 0 6GOD -6500 24223 560.40 637 C R 0 HEATING C AID CONDITIONING OVERPAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE 24224 10.74 168 C.I.A. ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS VICTORIA /TERRA VISTA/ C OTHER ITEMS 24225 7,151.07 62 CALIFORNIA JO'IRNAL SUBSCOIPTIDN FOR 6158 C OTMCR ITEMS 24226 S$.CO 1660 CASK •N CLEAVER EMPLOYEE OF THE HONIN GIFT CERT. 24227 -180.40 1611 CATRON CO. ONE M9 LABOR /AOJUST DOUR CLOSURES 24228 15.00 1611 BEATRICE CERVOTIA REFUND TRIP TO L..UGH12N 24229 10.00 1616 ARTHUR LMACON TUITION REIPBURSEPENT 24270 54.86 77 CITRUS MOt OHS ONTARIO, INC. SERVICE SHERIFFS DEPT •E6 lT0 74271 286.96 130 COMPUTER SF RV CE CO SERVICE MAN /BUC.•ff TR C OtP(R ITEMS 242)2 7,1TS.70 85 CUCAHONGA CO WATER GIST ROCKAOSE -N VICTOPSA M LP 24273 142 10 87 CUCAMONGA PAINTING PLEASE TAKE ACTION PA C GTHIR ITEMS 2423 4 1,797.23 954 GAYLE CUTHBIRTSCM SPRING IHSTR- 5107,5101,6301,5302 24235 267.35 107 OEICC 3 I12 X 16 SIG" 1423E 16.96 585 DTCTAPMGNE FLAT RATE REPAIR C OTHER HENS 24271 725.00 a ) 3 6 6- 8 -88 LIST OF WARRANTS 4 ITEMS 24246 Y PAYEE 982.89 . ;"a 156.19 s2ee 21249 216 748.09 1216 TOM OIETL B67 72 ASS 24231 546 ONORAN GAYLE 977 E f ! •0 24252 R SYSTEMS INC. 523 EASTMAN • 3.600.00 24234 INC 459 EGGHEAO•SOFT4ARE 24255 70.)8 18 THE 747 6711 EMPIRE 677 79 21257 ESPINDIA'7IRE SERVICE 119] MICHAEL ItCMS 2'288 S 49 GA6El ASSOCIATES 171 GENERAL TELEPHONE 568 29 24260 CO. 143 JERRY R. GRANT 1617 Gf•FRhGOO•S 24267 19.00 966 GTE UNIFORMS 200.00 2426) 283 RAMONA GUERRA 1610 POTTY 1 24264 NANSEN 342 "ILL. EDWARD 0, JA 4.960.50 On" 74266 871 SHEILA HOLMES 561 S.H. 24267 85.79 NOYT LUMBER Co. "CAI CENTER 131 ICN4 53.43 708 ALBERT ICE 1609 IHPERIAL INVESTMENT _30,0] 24270 CLUB 912 INDOOR COMFORT CONTROL ' INC . 1657 THE •NSTI 24277 270.00 TUTS OF ELECTRICAL AND '622 INIE94ATZONAL 500.00 2 24213 TIME RECORDER 1655 J.C. ELECTRICAL ou •. 712.30 176 JOBS AVAILABLE 697 DIANE JOHNSON 119 L U RIND I S 541 KODLOVICH DEBBIE $28 KRCUTIL. ATTO Ste MUNN, NARY f R 739 JACK lAM li 1696 ANNE LESCRINIER L'EG'AN Al 5666 REINER. AND 9C NIEI LINCOLN •PPOPEATT I 03 890 IOGUE, SALLtIL ENGINEERS 9T 1668 LOUIS THE TAIIOP 386 THE SP 4IlLIAM lYOM CO 956 OAK NAC OONAID JK REI 173 MC IACNIAh BURFORD C ARIAS 76 NARKNAN C Akf.?YNSKl SPI CLI ITEh OESCR A RAMCNO CUCAMONCA PACE 2 ... ............ NA9R9 NARR.APT. 513b 2{276___•_"___•__ !,430 5600.01 24239 242{0 128.42 70 8 L OfNfp ITEMS 24241 8.056.00 49. C OT14ER I7EhS 24242 •.160.76 it 24243 510,72 OTHER ITEMS 803 76 C DYNE SEA C GENE •GIASSFS INTAL TM6(IUGf 'AIFICO21S5Ct NIT E.N IN p SLA T 5014 6LUE 5 157EpNAN • 64C7 iSS LILENSE UV C OTHER 428FSH1063r SST 8 2848 PLANNER • SSSO 'N IMPROVENEI • 3210 11 it a AEO MY ER GINNER 06220 C 6221 I LICENSC T • Jo57 FRET 24211 24246 114.00 4 ITEMS 24246 70.00 3 ITEMS 982.89 . ;"a 156.19 s2ee 21249 216 748.09 24250 B67 72 ASS 24231 . 79250 •0 24252 316 21253 3.600.00 24234 591.00 24255 70.)8 24256 677 79 21257 89.10 ItCMS 2'288 S 49 24259 568 29 24260 11 60 24267 19.00 21262 200.00 2426) 47 20 1 24264 24263 4.960.50 On" 74266 836 58 24267 85.79 24268 53.43 21269 _30,0] 24270 267.30 24277 270.00 Ens 24272 500.00 2 24213 1. 461.00 ou •. 712.30 ....11 FEE .1a.up • 6130 -6607 165.00 RE PARKER 24276 641.32 UR C OtMIR ITt MS =1211 10.056.96 15.908.25 a. I 6- 8 -85 LIST OF HARRAH'S PAYEE T26 MC HELCO RACK -N -BOY CO. 1667 MERCURY FRTPERTY MANAGEMENT 418 RICHARD MILLS ASSOC14715 1651 OE ANNE C. MINOR 1089 MOORE ELECTRIC CONTRACTING 1608 SHERYL MORASKY 1147 CHEARICE MULLORAV 1140 NANCY MULLIGAN 061 WILLGAM MUSSER 1127 N 8 1 SUPPLIES 270 N 0 I'S THE OFFICE PLACE 1668 NATIONAL COGFOIWT146 COUNCIL ON 1601 ALPHONSE LEROY NICAS 1446 LEROY NICKS 201 NWC'4Y AUTOMMIIC TRANSMISSION 776 MICHELE Ol1VLh' 521 OLYMPIC STUDIOS, INC 1606 CITY OF ONTARIO 997 P I P PRINTING 874 PAULA PA04OR 665 PARAOYNE 1667 PRECISION BUILT POOLS 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 1662 R F HEATING AND AIR CCMOITIDN- 1016 R M R S TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA .MAMBER 1605 RANCHO ENGINE MACHINE 237 RAPID DATA, INC 720 VERA REAGAN 1771 RECENT$ OF UC 1620 RESULTS ADVERTISING 112 RI72 CAPERA CENTERS 216 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 1652 S C C C A 1661 S C A A F/ TEAP REGISTRATION 875 LIZ SALGADO 107 SAN BERN CO EPWA /LAND NA4AGEME91 1603 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY REGIONAL 1670 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 469 "PEN SCAFWO 1116 SCHAFFER 01404 ASSOCIATES RANCHO CUCAtONGA PAGE 7 ITEM OESCR 4ARA6 NARR.AMT. DURAL EHE PITOOL BOX /1MSTALLED 24279 497.11 O'.C7:PAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE 24280 11440 HAVEN AVE MEDIANS PHASE II 24281 161.50 OVERPAYPENT PLAN CHECK 88 .4820.21 24202 160.30 PROGRESS PAYMENT FOR EXTRA WORK 24283 4,510.01 REFUND FOR SOFTBALL LEAGUE 24284 10.00 COMPUTER IMTEfe PAYMENT 24265 296.00 SPRING INSTRUCTOR CLASS 6004 05,06 SPRING TNSTRUCTOR 24266 222.7$ CLASS N 5480 CABLE !CORK1fGSB /U /PLENUM T PAINTENANC6 21287 ]4286 77 BI 71.67 CONTRACT C OTHER ITEMS 24289 1,144 00 MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION 24290 $0.00 CPR COURSE REIM66RSEMENT 24291 16.00 MILEAGE RE IM6URSIMEKT 21292 17 95 INSTALL TRANS AND CONVERTER 24293 886.90 SPRING INSTR CLASS 5 5011 -5850 212f5 091.00 SPRING INSTR CLASS 1 6030,5900 21295 1,635.28 ' - t'146187703 24296 1 , 218.21 PJSS LAN. C OTHER ITEMS 24297 316..4 4 MFETTNGS FOR KIN"- - 6/24 24298 20.60 NO NAIWT CHARGE 016 THhOUGH 5,.. 14299 75 82 DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT 3094 211.- 250.00 MAY 46 STA69UAST C OTHER ITEMS 25301 S 1a OVERPAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE 24302 85.17 POSTAGE 24307 7,000.00 ANNUAL O1NHiR RESE RVATIONIC BUCUET 2470♦ 70.00 1VERPATMENT BUSINESS LICENSE 24105 11 94 5US2NESS CERTIFICATES C OTHER ITEMS 24306 765.72 WRING INSTA CUSS A $620 C $621 24701 400.37 iNROLLMENT FOR BEGIN LOTUS 1 -2 -3 24308 396.00 iVERPAYMENT OUSINESS LICENSE 21]09 '1'T. 00 NOTOFIXISHINO C DINER ITEPS 24310 66.59 ILUELINE PRINTS /STAPL C OTHER ITEMS 24311 100.64 IEETING 6/17 ADAMS /AUTHELET 24712 50.00 IEGIST. FEE F0.9 SUMMER SOF76ALL INS 21713 760.00 - OFTBALL OFFICIAL 5/21 24311 20.00 IURRINT CHAROLS C OTHER ITEMS 24315 451.03 •8 COUNTY REG PASKS MASTER PLAN 24316 7 00 'UBLILATION -,RESOURCE OIKECTORY" 2717 12,00 PRING INSTR CLASS 1 501e!19.20,520 2718 992.61 E RVICES FROM .'9 TO $16/40 24]19 37.50 W O I AN, ]xtid,k 6- 8 -86 LIST OF WARRANTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 4 '•'t' PAYEE --------------•--...-- ••-- •_- ITEE OESCR NAI.RL MA AS. AM T. _ ••--- ..._- _-- .._... - - -� .-------•---------'--'---- ----------------- - y 1138 1604 LAU2A SMITH SOURCECON D►RIHO INSTA CLASS 2 6627 24 -20 217.80 T%; 717 500THEAM CALIFORNIA EDISON CU. 110 6 -PP 6 -4 9331 9TH ITREXT 3 24721 91.00 i; 1664 SPEEDWAY MUFFLER INC. C OTHER ITEMS CATALYTIC CONVERTERS/ C OTHER ITEMS 24121 25723 I,1a6.68 646 313 STANDARD INSURANCE CO. STATE COMPENSATION JUNE LIFE INS POLICY 9.91390 -01 24324 $9).60 176.20 279 IRS. FUND THE SUN WORKERS COPP 3/6. 616108 24376 9,932.64 .y- 3017 SUPER STIR CORPORATION 6 MONTHS SUBSCRIPTION TO 12119166 HE tMf T/VIDD S1605-CRP 1G1 24326 38.30 1617 U.S. NOME CORPORATION OVERPAYPf MT PERMI] 26797 -b i6] 74327 74718 143.00 611.60 1054 UNITED TITLE PP'- LININARY TITLE REPORT 25)29 300.00 �7 1667 AND VISA ND LOCK AND SAFE CO. SIMPLEX 1000 -1 24370 294.66 y° 199 VISION SERVICE PLAN ACCT 0 VISION SERVICES 9 ITEMS JUNE0RP b0101139AR 24]31 2: 478 21) CARL WARREN C CO WAXIE, CLAIMANT GLENN ROBERT C OTHER ITEMS 24733 2,660.00 1,011.)2 .y 1602 XLEEM -LIME CORP WINDMILL 210 SIOHATURE TD?ELf C OLIER ITEMS 2 074 276,10 1619 PHOTO TIES SUPPLIES WINDMILL PROPERTIES INC. AND OVERHEAD PROJECTOR REPAIR 21]36 170.00 ,. 872 J04NNE W J04N NF NlTTfR OVERPAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE SPRING INSTA CLASS 2 6201 C 6201 24336 14.75 609 XEROX CORPORATION TONER SUMP AZT 24331 Z13lb 415.80 1601 1600 YUCAIPA CLEAHIMO SERVICE, INC. DONALD A. ZIMMER OVERPAYPLMT BUSINESS LICENSE 21339 13.51 17,79 DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT b 7050 24110 230.30 E TOTAL CHECKS .• ,92V.62 AN, t w ;4 a 8 r 11� DATE: T0: FROM: BY* SUBJECT: - -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 15, 1968 C1 Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Joel R. Lazo, Junior Civil Engineer Authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids' for the Area II Hellman Storm Drain Improvement Project, from Monte Vista to S.P.R.R. to be funded from Drainage Funds, Account No. 23- 4637 -8763. RECO0001DATION: It 1s recommended that City Council approve plans end specifications for the Area I1 Neuman Storrs Drain Improvement project from Monte Vista to S.P. R.R. and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids.' Background /Analysis The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by A.S.L. Consulting Engineers, reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $1,000,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for June 20, 1988 and June 27, 1983 %1 th the bid opening at 10:00 A.M., Tuesday, July 12, 1988. Res tf fly submitted, c,p Attachment cc: Purchasing a — e Y, RESOLUTION NO. 'S9- 3-7 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 7ANCHO CUfAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SHE *AREA II HELLMAN STORM DRAIN FROM MONTE VISTA 1T) S.P.R.R.', FUNDED FROM DRAINAGE FUND, IN SATO CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEP.EAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga iias prepared puns and specifications for tho construction of certain improvements WOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specif:cations presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby a,)proved as the plans and specifications for 'Area II Hellman Storm Drain'. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hc.oby authorized and directed to adverti;e as required by law for the receipt of st,,led bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: 'NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS' Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk In the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 12th day of July, 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the 'Area II Hellman Store Drain' in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office cf the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C. Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provtdad for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, 'Bid for Construction of Area II Hellman Stare Drain% PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character In the locality In wh1Lh the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing raqte of per them wages for holiday and ovcrtime work. In that regard the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of Califo -nia is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per them wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agoncy also shall cause a copy of such deteminations to be posted at the job site. The Cucamonga, twenty- flverdollars ($25.00)rfor.eachplaborer, rkman,tor mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is Paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and to accordance Kith the regulations of the LaN forni3 apprenticeship Council, properly indentured th apprentices may Le employed in e prosecution of the work. Attention 1s directea to the provisions In Sections :777.5 and 1777 6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprenticet by the Contractor or any subcontractor under his. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will als•• fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the nmaber of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C When the trade can show tlac it is replacing at leest 1130 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annuhl basis statewide or locally, or 0 When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on 3n annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the adntulstration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any appprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public vorks site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirwaents of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 In the employment of �U ti apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements he mey obtained from ppthe Director of ithe tDivisionlofrAprenticesh Francisco, California, or from pnStan ards and its branch offices. Eight constitute a for all of tract and the Contractor any sub,�ontractor under him of California having ato domwithwworking hours vasn set bforth In Division e laws of the 2, Part 7, Chapter 2, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The as a Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for eachalaborer, workman, or mechanic employed in tha execution of the contract, by him or any subcontra•:tor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mtntioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic 1s required or permitted to labor more than eight (81 hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence paycents are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's cneck, certified check, or bidders bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamondga for an amount to at tnatit a bidderswiltlnentereintolthe proposed contractsifdthe sage a isuawarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall becoce the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. biddarf thee City of the lowest idder'sd security shall a applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, If any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The the contract for saidh�work oneehu shall be hundred percent (100%)lofethercontract price thereof, an,' an addl Jonal bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (505) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the p*mr.t of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any %-vk or labor of any kind certificateothatahe will also mployeessL'pon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor who is not licensed in accordance with the previsions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7W0 et. seq.) and riles and regulations adopted pursuant tharoto or to whoa a proposal fors has not beer issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The work is to be 'done' in accordance with the profiles, plans, and CityiClerklat 9320 BasetLin oad R file in the office of Copies of the plans and specifications _,il be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00, scid $33.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and i said request accompanied by payment stipulated above, tojetherwitnaddftfonelnonre imbable $20.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. payment of The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In Provisions. aaccordance set forth in the requirements an and Specifications lsngarding thenwork contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole test and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monfes withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of . 19 PASSED AND AG.,.'TED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of 19 yor ATTEST: ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhtONGA sc STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 ICU Wl TO: City Council and City Manager J� FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael 0. Long, Se•utor Public Works Irspector SUBJECT: Approval to change Account Number from SO 325/TDA Fund, Account Number 12- 4637 -8605 to Pedestrian Grants /Article 3 Account Humber 16- 4637 -8716 for the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase II RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council change the account number for the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase It from SO 325/TOA Fund Account Nudrer 12- 4637 -8605 to Pedestrian Grants /Article 3 Account Number 16- 4637 -8716. Background /Analysis During a mid -year account fund transfer, the funding source for the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase II was changed as previously stated. On June 1, 1988, the project was awarded' under the previous account number. Henceforth, the project be shall referred to under the new account number. Respec /�bmitted, ,RHM:MDLad ��� _ (3 i 1! — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager �Cl FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector�i_f SUBJECT- Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 11997, located on the southeast corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street, submitted by Nordic Development RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Maynr and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Background /Analysts Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements for Tract 11997 were approved by the City Council on May 7, 1988, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $208,000 Labor and Material Bond: $109,000 The developer, Nordic Oevelopaent, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement, Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are avai5able in the City Clerk's Office. RespectfV34y submitted, Attachment "• :I RESOLUTION HO. V8- 390 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11997 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideratior, an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 15, 1988, by Nordic Development as developer, for the describedrtherein, and generally locatedeon the the southeastrcorner specifically Road and Beryl Street; and Improvement Agreement andtsub�ectnt fthe such terms thereof,.Isdescribed done said conjunction with the development of said Tract 11997; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. Rancho Cucamonga. Calliifornia. thatOsaid Improvement AgreementfZxtension and said Improvement Security ba and the sane are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. NEAR - �S k- r ,y DATE. TO: FROM: BY* SUBJECT: I CITv OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA oTAFF REPORT June 15, 1988 t; City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works InspectoCRe Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13117, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of Banyan Street, submitted by Paragon Homes, Incorporated RECOMME)IDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Background /Analysis Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements for Tract 13117 were approved by the City Council on flay 8, 1986, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $615,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5308.Ll- The developer, Paragon Hanes, Incorporated, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. le Resf submit ted, C Attachment .v RESOLUTION no. ft-381 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13117 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for Its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed an June 15, 1988, by Paragon Homes, Incorporated, as developer, fir the Improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of Banyan Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in con unction with the development of said Tract 13117; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreemen Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said improvement Security be and the sane are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: June 15, 1988 SM� To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Paul A. Rouyeau, Traffic Engineer Subject: Approval to execute a contract for consultant services to BSi Consultants Incorporated, in the amount of $13,120.00 plus 10% contingency for production of a City -Wide Traffic Control Device Inventory, to be runded from Gas Tax Fund Account No. 09- 4637 -8780. RECOPMEATION• It is recommended that a contract for consultant services for the production of a City -Wide Traffic Control Device Inventory be executed with BSI Consultants, Incorporated. BACKGRCIMD /AKALYSIS: The Capital Improvgnent Program for 1987 -88, as amended at mid -year, Includes the preparation of an inventory of certain traffic control devices throughout the City. This inventory will determine the number, condition and location of all traffic control devices in the City. The devices include but are not limited to are signs, stripes, legends and curb markings. A computer system (hardward and software) will also be provided to keep a dynamic system whereby devices can be monitored, serviced, replaced or removed according to time passed and current condition. The knowledge and control gained will help to reduce future risk and liability caused by substandard, damaged or missing traffic control devices. The project was awarded to BSI Cnnsultants, Inc., at the City Council, meeting of June 1, 1988 and has been properly executed by them. Certificate of Insurance has been received to at least the amounts listed in the agreement. Respecttf submitted, M:O - Ig CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA STAFF REPORT Date: June 15, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Magvire, City Engineer By: Juhn L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer .N aS vl `5 . Subject: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Gilbert D. Hells and Barbara J. Welts and the Cit, of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage improvements at 6357 M. Archibeld Avenue, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue betwen Hiniand Avenue and Lemon Avenue, for the Archibald Avenue Widening Project, RECUMIEWTIDM• It is recommended 2.1at City Council adopt the attached Resolution Dedication between Gilbert D. Wells AandtBarbara JI.uWe113 Ind the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACXCRUDID /AWALYSIS, The attached subject Agreement between the City and Gilbert D. Wells and Barbara J. Wells provides for street improvements which include curbs, gutters, sidewaits, drive approaches, street lights, retaining wool with metal railings and street pavements along the Wells' street frontage. Gilbert and Barbara Wells have agreed to grant to the City a Roadway Easement to allow for the widening and improvement of Archibald Avenue in return for the construction of said 4mprovements. Said street Improvements will be constr d in conjunction with the City's Archibald Avenue Uidening Project included in the Capital Improvement Program List for fiscal year 1987-88. Respectful ubmitted, •JLM• _ � Attachment - l9 RESOLUTION N0. $D -3 $� WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancbd Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of frontage improvements in conjunction with the Archibald Avenue Widening Project; and NNEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, blockwal. with metal railing, street lights and street pavements located at 6357 N. Archibald Avenue shall be made part of the Archibald Avenue Widening Project; and WHEREAS, Gilbert D. Wells and Barbara J. Wells have agreed to dedicate Right -of -Way as reimburseoent to the City for said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLYED, that the City Council of tie City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improveaaent Agreeaaent, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and d.retts tie City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Reco,der of San Bernardino County, California. V v A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF t RAN -HO CUC,AMONGA. GILIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND d ' DEDICATION FROM GILBERT D. WELLS AND BARBARA J. WELLS, AND AUTHORIZING THE 111YOR AND CITY CLERK TO r? SIGN SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancbd Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of frontage improvements in conjunction with the Archibald Avenue Widening Project; and NNEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, blockwal. with metal railing, street lights and street pavements located at 6357 N. Archibald Avenue shall be made part of the Archibald Avenue Widening Project; and WHEREAS, Gilbert D. Wells and Barbara J. Wells have agreed to dedicate Right -of -Way as reimburseoent to the City for said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLYED, that the City Council of tie City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improveaaent Agreeaaent, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and d.retts tie City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Reco,der of San Bernardino County, California. V v 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON: A. STAFF REPORT Date: June 15, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager rrom: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval to Award and Execute a Professional Services Agree_gnt with Land /Plan/Deslyn Group to parfnre Landscape Inventories, Mascer Beautification Plans for Milliken Avenue Median Islands and Parkways; 6th Street Medfrn Island; and Milliken Avenue Underpass Schematic Alternates for a fee not to exceed 545,839.00 to be naid from the Beautification Fund, Account No. 21 -464+ -8718. An additional 10% rontingen y allowance to be established for use under t%e approval of the City Engineer. RECOOF"TIOM: Approval to Award and Execute t Professionil Services Agreement with Land /Plan/Design Group to perform Landscapo Inventories, Master Beautification Plans for Milliken Avenuc Median Islands and Parkways; 6th Street Median Island; and Milliken Avenue Underpass Srhewtic Alternates for a fee not to exceed $45,839.00 to be paid frog the Beautification Fund. M additional 10% contingency allowance to be established for use under the approval of the City Engineer. Following a Req+est for Qualific Grour has been selected as weting perform the r+� dscape Inventories D preparation. of performance of the inventory and the Planning Commission. Re u..�! submitted, Attachment aticns, the fire of Land /Plan /Design the yuallficatSons desired by staff to and Master Plan Norkings for the construction plans will follow the select'on of the landscape sciemes by — CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 10: City Council and City Mandger FROM: Russell H Maguire, City Engineer BY: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to execute a Professional Service Agreement for design serr,ces relating to the updating of the City's Standard Flans and Development Specifications to J.F Davidson Associates, Incorporated, for the amount of $27,975.00 to be funded from Development Management Contract Services, Account Number 01- 4638 -6028 RECOMi OATION: It is recommended Ihdt the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the project to update the City's Standard Plans and Specifications which was awarded to J.F. Davidson Associates, Incorporated, on June 1, 1988. It is also recommended that the City Council authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend 529,780.00 ($27,075.00 plus 10%) to be funded from Development Management Contract Services, Account Number 01- 4638 -6028. Background /Analysis It has become necessary to review and ipdate the City's Standard Plans and Specifications. Those standards are used in the construction of street, storm drain and other public inyrovements within the City. The standards were last approved in 1981 and since that time technology, construction techniques, and regulations have developed a need for their update. The project will consist of reviewing the existing strndards to incorporate necessary changes to produce a compldtely new set of standard plans and specifications. ' 2esp s bmitted, X �/ -, R• b I t� i' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIAONGA All �. STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Approve, to award and execute Professional Services Agreement with Golden Coast Environmental Services, Incorporated, Irvine, California, for preparation of a City -wide Street Tree Inventory And Computerized Tree Management Program in the amount of $85,000.00 plus a 10% contin3ency for a total appropriation of $93,500.00, to be funded from Beautification Fund Account No. 21- 4647.8778 RECOMMEMCATIO.s: It is recommended that the City Count", award the City Ride Street Tree inventory And Computerized Tree Management Program, to Golden Coast Env I rommental Services of Irvine, California, and authorize the the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. 3ACKGROUND /ANALYSIS In researching the available consultants anm methods for developing a street tree Inventory, staff found that programs ranged from numerous manual paper grog :as to only tra sophisticated computerized programs. A review of the manual systems revealed a very slow color intensive process Involving City staff and volunteer students to collect information. The two computer programs available also varied in nature. Cie program would Involve extensive field reward. which would be translated into a computerized inventory and tree managemrit program specifically - custrvmized for the City by Consulting Arborist Fred Roth. The progrsm developed by Mr. Roth would also utilize City a•!d /or stedent volunteers to collect field information. The other computerized inventory and management program is offered by Golden Coast Environmental Services, Inc. of Irvine. Golden Coast's program is the most o- prehensive and viable of all cot,ons reviewed by staff. �3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REFGRT� CITY WIDE STREET TREE INVENTORY AND COMPUTERIZED TREE NANAGENEhT FRrGRAN JUNE 15, 1988 PAGE 2 The program, which has been developed for cities such as the City of Anabetm, the City of La canaea Fitntridge and the City of Riverside, can be tailored to fit the specific needs of any agotacy. All field date are collected by the consultant's trained and eyperienced staff employees using lap top commuters. The result is greater accuracy in a relatively short time without Impacting City staff. `r Staff has checked with other cities using the program and reviewed samples of specific reports and inventories which are part of the { program. Wtat we have discovered is that Golden Coast has been very successful in combining their expert background in arboriculture, horticulture and computer science to develop a highly professional product. i -` We are of the opinion that the program offered by Golden Coast is the one !?i• best suited to help the City fulfill its commitment to establish an effective tree management program. Respe i]y- sbbmitted, RHN�sl% ✓ cc: Furchasing _ aY -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA;+•'> STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 .q TO: City Council and City Manager ` FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superipterdent SUBJECT: Award and execute Professional Services Agreement with Meyer and Associates, Laguna Hills, California, the City I Parks Facilities Retra -Fit Improvement Project, includes athletic equipment storage buildings, trash dumpster enclosures, drive approaches, concrete paving, minor greding for drainaga, fence repair, minor slope drainage, concrete mowstrips, and tree planters, in the amount of $20,500 Plus a 10% contingency for a total appropriation of $22,550 to be funded from the Parks Capital Improvement Account No. 01 -4647 -7043 RECON00ATION: It is recommended that the City Council award the City Parks Facilities Retro -Fit Improvement Project, to Meyer and Associates, of Laguna Hills, California and authorize 'he Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Proposals for the above referenced project were submitted by three consultants. A breakdown of the proposals is as follows: Purkis. -Rose Associates, Fullerton, CA $26,760.00 Meyer ana Associates, Laguna Hills, CA 20,500.00 Randolph Hlubik Associates, Riverside, CA 15,500.00 After careful analysis of all proposals as they relate to the scope of work, a check of references of similar projects, and an interview with each consultant to discuss their respective views of how they would approach the project, Staff is opinion that the second bidder, Meyer and Associates, is the best responsible bidder to perfora the design work. R18:41w y bmitted, RA - as CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA STAFF REPORT Date: June 15, 1988r To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Richard R. Cota, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and ASL Consulting Engineers for the preparation of design plans, contract specifications and engineer's estimate on the Church - Hermosa Storm Drain within Master Plan Watershed Area YI from approximately 360 feet north of 19th Street to the Church Street Basin. The not- to•exreed fee of 279,435.00 plus 103 contingency will be fumed from Drainage Fees, Account No. 23- 4637 -8761. RECOMEIOATI(M. It is hereby recommended that the City Council approve and execute the above subject Professional Services Agreement with ASL Consulting Engineers. BA0=0tND/AXALYSlS- The proposed Drain Street Church Street isintendedoirctStorm and nuisanceru off within a storm dr,rin pipe at Hermosa Avenue and Church Street. This proposed drainage system will supplement and connect the existing concrete channel outlet wtich presently directs storm and nuisance runoff onto Hermosa Avenue north of 19th Street and the Church Street Basin west of Haven Avenue. The proposed storm drain will outlet said runoff directly into the Church Street Basin. The proposed drain will be designed to mitigate the 100 -year storm and will also the ftiate 19th Stre t,tBaseoLine RoadoandHChurch Street. Respec f RHM: :Pam Attachment N — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 � TO: City Council and City Manager FROM Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspe CoF SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMWERDATION: The required street improvements for 5810 Hellman Avenue have been Coouunncileacceptasaid tmprovements,eauthorizetthesCity Engineer toafileta Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $3,300. Background /Analysis 5810 Hellman Avenue DEVELOPER: James Ngiam 5810 Hellman Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Release: Faithful Performance Boyd (Street) $3,300 RespectfuUv submitted, RFDi: . Attachment a 7 w S RESOLLiION N0. s$ - 3g 3 A REFOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 5810 HELLMAN AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A r NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public 'Improvements for 5810 Hellman Avenue has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and 4HEREAS, a Notica of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with ` the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. N RECOMMEliOATIOM: a� The required street improvements for Tract 9400 have been completed ire an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accent the Maintenance Guarartee Bond in the amount of $2,500 and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $25,000. City Council had accepted said improvements and authorized the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion at the regularly scheduled mxeting of April 20, 1988. Background /Analysis Tract 9400 _ located on the north side of Eanyan Street, east of Beryl Street DEVELOPER: Prado Corporation 1156 N. Tustin Avenue Orange, CA 92667 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $2,500 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $25,000 V Respectfully submitted, Attaciment - a9 I -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: City Council and -aty Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Dilliland, Public Works InspeZLw SUBJECT: Release of Bonds RECOMMEliOATIOM: a� The required street improvements for Tract 9400 have been completed ire an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accent the Maintenance Guarartee Bond in the amount of $2,500 and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $25,000. City Council had accepted said improvements and authorized the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion at the regularly scheduled mxeting of April 20, 1988. Background /Analysis Tract 9400 _ located on the north side of Eanyan Street, east of Beryl Street DEVELOPER: Prado Corporation 1156 N. Tustin Avenue Orange, CA 92667 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $2,500 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $25,000 V Respectfully submitted, Attaciment - a9 I v r, Y I CITY OF RANCHO CUCADSONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor SUBJECT' RELEASE OF CASH DEPOSIT ral An RECOMMENDATION: o tracts has been ��a csef are hereby recomn ae by the Planning Division to be released to: Res fully Itted, ad le �-- City ann,. BB.nas - 3a AMOUNT OF DEPOSIT PURPOSE HILL WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT f 628.00 Subdivision Sign Tract 13066 M A 5 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ 628.00 Subdivision Sign Tract 12772 LEWIS DEVELOPMENT $2,500.00 Sales Office a $ 500.00 Subdivision Sign for Tract 12364_1 LEWIS DEVELOPMENT 52,500.00 Sales Office Tract 9504 Res fully Itted, ad le �-- City ann,. BB.nas - 3a — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT d I DATE Jurs 15, 1988 M K eyor and Members of the City Council FROM RoL art A. Rizzo, Assistant Citj Manager BY: Jsrty B. Fuhvood, Resource Center Coordinator Staff mconmends that City Council ergrovo the attaches .resoluWn authorizing the levy of an assessment management fee of S5.D0 per parcel for the expenses Incurred In the collection of assessments within the Alta Loma Channel (AD 8{-2), the 6th Street Industrial Park Refuna District (AD 82.1R) and the Rancho Cucamonga Storm Draln District (AD 86.2). Section 8682 of the Government Code authorizes the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish an assessment management fee of 8 maximum of five percent (5 %) M the amount of Installment and mut to exceed eight dcilars par lot or parcel. This would allow the City to rollover hs five dollars par parcel for collection and management of assessment districts that are applicable to the Improvement Bond Act or 1915. This management too would only Impact the Alta Loma Channel District. the 5th Street Industrial Disll^t and the Rancho Cccamonga Storm Drain District. Respectfully submitted, rA Robert A. Rizzo Assistant City Manager RARJBFsgr Attachment. Rosolution 31 RESOLUTION NO. p *+ � pE5 RsSF Sly A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AV17HORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has heretofore undertaken proceecangs pursuant to the *Municipal Improvement Act of 1913' being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed assessments upon land within various special assessment districts (hereinafter collectively referred In as the "Assessment Districts'); and, WHEREAS, said proceedings provided for and the City did subsequently Issue bonds pursuant to the 'Improvement Bond Act of 1915, being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Coda of the State of California, said bonds representing unpaid assessments within the Assessment Districts; and, WHEREAS, the City does Incur necessary administrative expenses In the collection of the annual Installments of the assessments within the Assessment Districts; and, WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8682 does authorize the City to establish an assessment surcharge to allow the City to recover Its expenses of oolledlon of said assessments; and, WHEREAS, The City desires to establish such an assessment surcharge as authorized by said Government rode Section 8682 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and coned. SECTION 2: The Treasurer is hereby directed to add to the annual Installment of assessments within the Assessment Districts a maximum of five percdnt (5%) of the amount of the installments and of the Interest thereon, not to oxceed the Treasurer's estimate of the expenses of collection, and in any case not to exceed $5.00 par tot or parcel. Said expenses of collection shall include the necessary administrative expenses of the City Incurred In providing the County Auditor with current Information regarding the ownership or division of the affscted lots or parcels of land within the Assessment Districts to ensure the proper entry by the County Auditor in his or her assessment roll and the timely oollectan of the assessment Installments. SECTION 3: The above assessment surcharge, when collected, shall belong to the City and shall cover the expenses and compensation of the Treasurer incurred in the collection of the assessments, and of the Interest and penaftles added on to the assessments. - 3� ' -�— CITY OF R"C1i0 CUCAMONGA STAFP REPORT 4� i DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BY: Elizabeth StoddarJ . Assistant finance Director SUBJECT: 1987 -88 8 -� RECOIM, MENDA Approvr all 1987 -88 budgetary adjustments for the General Spec a Reserve ads, and Agency Funds. . Capital Protects, Bac kro As a further refinement to the 1997_88 budget, adjustments revenues and aDDropriadons picture crystalizes. The requested to estimated budgetary to estimated revenue actin It revenues, all cases are Indications an Increasen is APPropria tfons are which was not antfcfPited with the increase in throughout the fiscae lny adjusted to reflect a �•h if of April adjustments. the agency fund - year. Additionally, the increase in Priorities which occur yrouD. reflect larger than anticipated bond calls. appropriations to Respectfully submitted, Jim Hart i� Admfn lstrat lve Services Director JH: ES :cv Attachments 1. 33 ■ �7 I 1987/88 BUDGETARY ADJUSTMENTS Estimated Revenues Increase Dacrease General FoiM 01 -3900 l0 l0 Penalties and Interest 5,500 ` 1800 Property Transfer Tax 12,000 01 -3901 2220 Bicycle Licenses 75 4550 Franchise Fees 61,000 .z 4553 Franchise Fees - Cable T4 30,000 '$ 7280 '410 Planning Fees 50,000 Sale of Printed Material 10,000 Case over and short 120 01 -3999 District Reimbursements _ 15.000 Met effec on revenue 183,695 Gas Tax 2107, 2107.5 09 -3900 Interest Earnings 24.000 Met effect on revenue 24,000 SB 300 15 -3900 44 0 -- Interest Earnings 3.000 Met effect on revenue 3,000 Park Development 20 -3901 O_0 Interest Earnings 229.360 Net effect on revenue 229,360 Beautification ' 21 -3901 8-0 In lieu fees 89.000 3 Met effect on revenue 89,000 �7 I 2? -3901 4 0� fMM- eve' nt ntares, 33 -3401 bbDO tarnfngs 8527 let effect cn IMmue 23 -3901 8TH 7501 D fns - �7� Storm / - nerat cfty rs Droin '—'� 54_3901 fees -- Contrfbutf0os frao' RDA MOO-- Net effect on r`verme 250a�07 Ca ites R ••.r Interest rningt ds Estfasted Revenues Increase Decrease 150 150 746,020 6,800,006 7,546,020 200.000 200,000 10,000 1111 000 70,0,,)0 4.700 4,700 8,000 3,500 100 2.522 14,122 22,000 6,5('8 100 S.15a 33,754 25,000 1,900 ---400 27,300 i Net effect on revenue 33 -3401 bbDO Resaurc —`-9 Center /As 8527 c sxmnl; esc drnings User Charges !let effect on revenue 54_3901 MOO-- General Cit 5 Interest tr Lf ht In rn logs s Bet effect M revenue 15� 0� Lf h r DI t fi 1040 Property ax - C Y secured rePerry Tax 1060 4600 - P/y secured Interest Earnings 6 Inter. Rat effect on revenue 56 -3901 100 L1 h in of trf t 02 1040 r0perty ax - p/Y secure! Property Tax 1060 4600 _ /Y secured lnterestxEarnenalties 6 Inter. net effect on revenue 57 -3901 !0 (1 Lr htln O1 trio /3 1040 4600 °'�oerty ax - C/Y secured 17perty Tax - P/y secured lnterest Earnings Met effect on revenue ds Estfasted Revenues Increase Decrease 150 150 746,020 6,800,006 7,546,020 200.000 200,000 10,000 1111 000 70,0,,)0 4.700 4,700 8,000 3,500 100 2.522 14,122 22,000 6,5('8 100 S.15a 33,754 25,000 1,900 ---400 27,300 i Estimated Revenues Increase Decrease 58 -3901 Llahtina 01^triet f4 2r� Property Tax - C%Y secured 25,000 1040 Property Tax - P/Y secured 600 1060 Property Tax - Penalties Interest 50 4606 Interest Earnings 2.442 get effect on revenue 28,092 59 -3901 L,1% 0istrlct 16 gbuu — merest -mss 267 Net effect cn revenue 267 60 -3901 Liahtlna Ois trlct i6 BOB Tax 'ropertyi— - C%Y secured 703 4600 Interest Earnings 2S Net effect on revenue 728 72 -3901 IGS TOY— Interest Earnings 15,000 8523 Assess. Dist. Reimburse. I,800 9002 User Charges 175.000 Met effect on revenue 191,800 73 -3901 Benefits Contingent a� 7nteres� 15.000 Met effect on revenue 15,000 75 -3901 AD 08-1 Etlwanda /Mlahland CFD Od u ntcrest rnings 1.706 Net effect on revenue 1,700 80 -3901 Al 84 -2 Al a L'm' �hann 7 UW Interest arnings 32.000 Net effect on revenue 32,000 81 -3901 AD 84AD 84 -2 Red mRed m t�ton 020 ropertP y Tax - C/Y secured 29,342 1040 Property Tax - P/Y secured 193,273 1060 Property Tax - Penalties 8 Int 76,221 4600 Interest Earnings _11.958 Met effect on revenue 236.878 Estimated Revenues Increase Decrease $' 82 -3901 AD 34-2 5neetal Reserve Y, 460 nten rest aret� 9.200 Net effect on revenue 9,200 MISS It ., 83 -3901 AD 82 -1 6tA St. Indus rie a d�bo Interest earn togs 34.926 ;;• Net effect on revenue 34,925 89 -3901 Red ements C3G 9 -eii a—rnt Interest earnings 24.n66 S y Net effect on revenue 24,9E6 2• 92 -3901 AD 84 -1 R�ry Fund N- T600 — nterestI earnings 127.242 Net effect on revenue 127,242 " 93 -3901 AD 82 -1R Redem tt on Find - Tb30 roperty as - f secured 562 ti 7905 Early rede©ptten 36.681 iNet effect on reveeuo 37,243 r 1 94 -3901 AD AMR Reserve Fund X00 Interest earnings 31.634 F Net effect on revenue 31,634 Y' 37 1 '�• ctr � u+p° arty r� o -*WAN s� s,y,aoo.00 r Si* AO Swp F[ Mria` C u� �n � l lSEn¢SS mil, � 7n• i.t• u.Sn 0.S10.SS i1.1 p10-11 Sp.l7pD.C'1 Ion. 9M Q S'S tSl IM Olt, tp.7 17. 19SS ctla$- VD... tti7Q asset. I&AE cw, SS.w -" 67.VAA 1 i \a — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FPOM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BT: Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: LION STREET BID /YARD RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize a correction be made to a previous action with respect to the account number to be charged for the Lion Street project to the Capital Reserve Fund, Account f25 -4285 -7043. Background: On June 1, 1988, Council authorized the award of a bid for Lion Street between the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad and 9th Street, to the lowest responsible bidder, JED Construction. The account number to be charged for the project 1s not consistent with where the funds were currently budgeted. Therefore, this action will correct the oversight and allow for proper budgetary accounting. Respectfully submitted, —:::L �Y Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH:ES:cv 3p .. D I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM BATE June 3, 190a TO City Council FROM: Lauren M Wasserman, City Manager I BY Marti Higgins, Olsaete- Preparedn a Coordinator +I SUBJECT Use of Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center an interim I location of Emergency Operations Center (E O C ) Upon completion of the Public Safety facility In 1909 tour roams have been dunignated for use am the City's Emergency Operations Center In the Interim, the city must address its vulnerability by establishing a temporary site After researching several possible sites the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center was selected Since the center In used daily for numerous comcunity activities most of these would be cancelled upon activation of the R 0 C The only exception would be the seniors hot lunch program Every effort would be made to accommodate this program It possible Requirements for conversion 1 Tan additional single telephone lines to be brought in and stored above the ceiling tiles until needed 7 Several maps, status boards and telephones would be stored nt the center 3 Strategirally placed small hooka in the walla of the Mission Room to accommodate maps and statue boards — a Five portable cnbinete containing two radios each would he permanontly set up against the east Mali of the Mina'�n Room This would take np approximately 100 aq feet of floor space Rndln communication 'a our most valnable and vital reaourcn, In an emergency Consequently It is of the utmost importance that they remain set up at all timen In a .ocked cabinet and tested regularly s All equipment used at the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center E 0 C will be transferred to the Public Safety facility upon its completion, thus returning the center to Its present condition ya M 1 0 . Page Two June 3, 1888 I �C. �.i Although we will be In a permanent In approximately twelve months, we must have ee interim 1 catien In the event of a major disaster this proposal to cost effective and It will not disrupt senior services at the Neighborhood Center. If Council approves of this !nterim location, we will discuss it with the seniors �i Please t me Information If you have quantlona or would like addltlanal ion yC _ y, N �CAIE. 2% _C.. mrm uru Naf I TNOmPapN STORM.E gym' PdOM (erin) iEa70.00n5 N.""G Trap �o.laV � i L 0 NaRTN t�nr-I1,.eft Urto- R f R) SuViM $IN [.Y pfl (arry� _ �av -� Rr• �.M�. a[w[m puree j[.uaNwT 0.[M�CANa MCI" i 0.00.1 Loe�lnet OPERATIONS Trap �o.laV � i L 0 NaRTN t�nr-I1,.eft Urto- R f R) SuViM $IN [.Y pfl (arry� _ �av -� Rr• �.M�. i r i W1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 0 8 DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, Community Development Director SUBJECT: ESTABLISHMENT OF REIMBURSEMENT FROM PROCEEDS OF FINANCING IN CONNECTION WITH ACOUISITION OF LAND. M ZA�U T6F tAGiLIM5 XUATIN(i IU Ift 9 R The City and Redevelopment Agency currently contemplate completing acquisition of the 99 acre Central Park and commencing design in anticipation of developing a phased development program. The phasing and construction of this park project will be dependent upon a future City and /or Redevelopment Agency bond Issue •- Certificates of Participation and /or Tax Allocation bonds. In anticipation of such future financing, all expenditures made in connection with the acquisition, design and construction of this park facility k'll be reimbursable through these financings. In order to accodplish this, a Resolution needs to be adopted establishing such reimbursement. RECOMMENDATION: Adootion of the attached Resolution which establishes re r. ursement rom the proceeds of a planned lease financing. R 1 \ \pectful y submitted, Jack Lam, AICP Community Development Director JL /,r Attachment - y3 rre � /Mho JMY9Op V iM1IL ' Y � i iPN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhIONGA RESOLUTION NO. � .5SS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROVIDING THAT PAYMENTS MADE BY THE CITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION OF LAND AND THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES RELATING TO THE 99 ACRE CENTRAL PARK PROJECT ARE TO BE MADE IN ANTICIPATION OF REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A PLANNED LEASE FINANCING WITH CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND 17IRECTING CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the'Chy'): WHEREAS the City is proposing to proceed with a lease financing with certificates of participation; and WHEREAS. In connection therewith, the Clty pr000ses to finance the acquisition of certain land and the design and construction of cortaln facilities rotating to the 99 acre Central Park project (the 'Project-) and it Is In the best Interest of the City, Is In the public Interest and is for the public benefit that the City set forth Its expectation of reimbursement from the proceeds of such proposed financing; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, OFTERMINED AND OP.DERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: — action 1 Any payments made by the City from Its general fund In connection with the Project prior to the consummation of the p,opo3ed base financing with certificates of participation are Intended to be made strictly In anticipation of reimbursement therefor from the proceeds of such financing Section 2 The Mayor or the City Manager Is hereby authorized and directed to do any and all things and take any and all actions which may be necessary or advisable In accordance with INS Resolution Section 3 This Resolution Shall take effect Immediately yy — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Ju%a 15, 1988 TO: C.ty Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Ergineer BY: Judy A. Acosta, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval to Deanrex Tract Nos. 12402, 12365, 12672 and 12673 Work Program Areas (Terra Vista Planned Community) from landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and setting the date of Publ.c Hearing for July 20, 198b RECpIOMTI AO: It is recormended that City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the public hearing regarding deannexing the work program areas on the above described tracts from Landscape Nalntenanca District No.:. Background /Analysis Attached for City Council approval 1s a resolution deannexing Tract Nos. 12402, 12365, 12672 and 12673 work program areas (parkways and trails only) from Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista) and setting the public hearing date for July 20, 1988. The areas to be deannexed are: Project TR 12402 Terra Vista Parkway Spruce TR 12365 Terra Vista Parkway Spruce Avenue Mountain View Drive TR 12672 Terra Vista Parkway Spruce Avenue Parkways and Trails 11,278 4 90 Tl'm- 12,250 sq. ft. 4,004 a 01 �3D3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 12402, 12365, 12672 and 12673 June 15, 1908 Paga Two Project TR 12673 Terra Yista Parkway Church St Elm Avenue Respect it Witted, �/� RNM:J U_ Attachment r Y Parkways and Trails 4,420 4,163 5,550 2,849 10 360 .� RESOLUTION NO.qS .3 8� ,i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DEANNEXATIO11 OF WORK PROGRAM AREAS OF TRACT MOS. 12402, 12365, 12672 AND 12673 FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 WHEREAS, Tract Nos 12402, 12365, 12672 and 12673 were annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, (Terra Vista Planned Coonunity) by the T Formation, Annexation Nos. 1, 2 and 3, respectively. WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution No. d&•336 has determined that those areas that would not otherwise be maintained by the District be maintained by the abutting property owner. x WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga deems it s necessary to deannex the abutting parkways and trails far Tract Nos. 12402, 12365, 12672 and 12673 from the work program areas of Landscape Naintenan,:e District No. 4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: SECTION 1: That those work program areas for the parkways and trail:: abutting raT c-i: Nos. 12402, 12365, 12672 and 12673 be deannexed from Landscape Maintenance District No. 4. SECTION 2: A published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 61961 of the Government Code. The Mayor and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California q7 ■ PEANNEXATION FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 ,,ems... Ground and Tree Maintenance LOT s c LOT m Q LOT 7 LOT 6 o LOT t ai o PkwaY N Vises -T et �g CITY OF RANCHO Ci CA,bIONGA C �. I ENGINEERING DIVISION ' vrcINITY "a N DEANNEXATION FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 GROUND AND TREE MAINTENANCE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AhIONGA 'R 12Hbs Gt�z ENGINEERING VIC VICINITY MAP ISTON r im l� DEANNEXATION FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. -¢ 0 ��CITY OF RANCHO CUCArV(O,�A • �,`c C} , ENGINEERING DIVISION ' °� ;m — VICINITY MAP N — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1989 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Parcel Map 9504, located at the northeast turner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 as Annexation Ito. 8 and setting the date of public hearing for July 20, 1988 RECOlIME11DATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 8 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described parcel map to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4. Analysis /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Parcel Map 9504, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 for Annexation No. 8 and setting the public hearing date for July 20, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Respec r pbTitted, / t RH Attachments 53" RESOLUTION NO. 'S4 -3s7 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO :AWNGA, CALIFCRNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY 'SEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 8 TO LANDSCAPE ITENANCE DISiRICT NO. 4 WHEREAS, on June 15, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHERE4S, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o-T said work and of the incidental expenses to connection therewith, contained 1n said report be, and each of them ara hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr e n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within slid Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTI04 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land to salldTisssment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report 1s hereby ti preliminarily app -oved and confirmed. SECTION 4• -hat said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. L� - 5.3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA f Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 E Annexation No. 8 for Parcel Map 9504 i SECTION 1. Authority for Report r This report is in compliance with the requirements OF Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Cade, State of California ` (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972), "• SECTION 2. General Description t This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions Into Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Parcel Map 9504 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Englneeripg Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped lmprnvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs NO costs will be Improvements will be construtl r tedbyadevelopers. Based conshistorical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (S.30) certs per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 is comprised of landscaping of work plan areas for all residential and non - residential (including vacant land) p:oJects throughout the Terra Vista Planned C=wnity. The estimated total cost for Landscape Ma ntenance District No. 4 Including Annexation No. 8 is as follows: Existing Annex New District No .88 Tetal Landscape Area $204,709.00 0 $204,709.00 No. of D. U. 1,766 32 1,798 ,7 J IV 11 y Per Lot Annual Assessment_ $204,709,00 $113.e5 1,790 attached sas essmentldiagram. to each Whereltheadeve opmentdcoveredtby thisnannexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram tt A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled Exhibit A% by this reference the diagram Is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of specific benefit to all properties (resloentlal and non - residential) within the District in accordance with the following relationship: Single - family residential projects: 1 dwelling unit 1 assessment unit Multi - family residential projects: 1 dwelling unit • 0.5 assessment unit Non - residential proje:ts: 1.0 acre • 2.0 assessment units The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7, Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Intention .o Annex to District and sets public hearing date. I City Council condurts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Anne. to the District or abandon the proceeding;. 4 Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council, 5 Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. Properties and flprovenents to be Included within Annexation No. 8 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4; *(Eastern half of median island on Haven Avenue from Base Line Road to lalencia Avenue previously annexed Pe- Annexation No. 6) MAINTAINED AREA PROJECT ACREAGE ASSE55 STREET UNIT —� S47". *PM 9504 pcl 1 .83 1.6 Pei 2 .48 1.0 psl 3 2.64 5.3 pcl 4 .62 1.2 pcl 5 2.38 4.8 Pei 6 4.27 8.5 pcl 7 .91 1.8 pcl 8 1.02 2.0 pcl 9 .64 1.2 pcl 10 .48 1.0 pcl 11 .87 1.7 TOTAL 15.95 32.0 *(Eastern half of median island on Haven Avenue from Base Line Road to lalencia Avenue previously annexed Pe- Annexation No. 6) ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ¢ ANNEXATION NO.8 TERRA VISTA VILLAGE BASE LINE ROAD I C[TY OF RP.NCHO CUCANIC NGA 7 ' ENGINEERING DIVISION i�' VICINITY NIAP N RESOLUTION No, gs - 3 Sd A RESOLUTION OF TI;E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO THE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE RMAINT NANCEEDISRICT NODE4, A9 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 8 TO LANOSrVC MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEAR;NG OBJECTIONS THERETO HOW, THEREFORE DE IT RESOLVED by the City ouncil of the city of Rancho 19722,,obeingpDivisiont15tof he thevStreetsoandoHighwaysaCod�j of d dthegState of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work, convenience requ re an s e n en 1 maintenance district in the City of Ranch operation of those parkways and facililte by deed or recorded su greenbelt b poundariespOf the sProposed maintenance d1 hereof. Said maintenance and operation 1 any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plant lighting, structures, and walls in connec That the public iaterest and Of this City Council to form a Cucamonga for the maintenance and thereon dedicated for common Ivlsion tract map within the ^1ct described in Section 2 ludes the cost and supervision of Is, landscaping, ornamental in with said parkways. SECTION 2 Location f a foregoing be located w 57ndway ir%gt O y and iandscapingasementsofLandscape Maintenance District No. 4 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the offica of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 8 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contempla a wor , in a op n un o sa y ounc , is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense Of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district Is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as - follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 8 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4• neretufore approved by the City Council of said City lines the said st indicating extent Included bounaar the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 4. Peoort of En ineer: The City Council of said City b; Resolution No, as approve a repot of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 8, Landscape Maintenance District No. 4" it on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of tke work. SECTION S. Collection of Fesessmentc: The assessment shalt be collected of -tT,e smne me an n ie same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments fo, the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hea�ring: Notice is hereby given that or July ZD; T981�at a our o .Mn the City Council Lhamhers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be dune or carried out or wily said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest 1s not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such arotest must contain or he accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SEL,ION 7. La�ndsc�a ino and Ltohtino Act of 1972: All the work herein propos s al.lie— ne -and carried roug n pursuance of all act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and sighting Ect of 1972, filling Division 1: of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. :ECTION 8. P,bllcation of Resolution of intention: Published notit� _ !hall be Rabe pursuanF 16 RE on o t e2 gay, rrxaen ode. The Mayor !hall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to thr stme, and the City Clerk shill cause the same to oe published 10 day, hefore the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail - Report, e r : aaper of general cirwlation published In the City of On ado; CnTTrornia circulated iu the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. S� r CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. MagAre, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Alde SUDJIcr: Approval to Annex OR 87 -41, iocatod west of Utica Avenue, south of Arrow Highway, and CUP 87 -42, located on the southeast corner of 8th Street and Cleveland Avenue to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 21 and setting the date of public hearing for July 20, 1988 RECOMIEBDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 21 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described protects tc Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval 1s a resolution declaring the City's Intent to annen OR 87 -41, located west of Utica Avenue, south of Arrow Highway, and CUP 07 -42, located on the southeast corner of 8th Street and Cleveland Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Annexation No. 21 and setting the public hearing date for July 20, 1 ^88. Also attached for Council consideration 1s a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from ttm developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division, Respec 1 pbmitted, PfU JAA:Jh Attachments -1 ' RESOLUTION NO. $ g44;9�0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMIt1ARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION 40. 21 TO LANDSCAPE MAIN'ENANCF. DISTRICT NO. 3 WHEREAS, on June 15, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has male and filer! with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council haF duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLYED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of—s—af'work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be. and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. RECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment Dlstri�t referred to and de'sUfFe—dTh said report, the boundories of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sal3"Nssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidon,al expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby " preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for iFie purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. l W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMNGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 21 'or OR 87 -41 and CUP d7 -12 F SECTION 1. Authority for Report , This report is In compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 4 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California ,+ (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTIOf; 2. General Description This City Council his elected to annex all new develoMents into Landscape %&intenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be grantee, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Speclficatidns a The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Refe•ence 1s hereby made to tha subjezt development plan and the assessment Ci diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped imorov:anent or the individual development is " hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached herctu. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred oy the District for parkway and median improvement construction. All Improvements will be constructed by developers and or /by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed— work standards, it 1s estiaated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated Into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the .maintenance costs within the project boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the Uistrlct. Y (3 Zone 2 is comprised of ail other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis 'or the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Oeer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street froe west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from ath Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and some parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 21 is as follows. Zone 1 Existing Total estimated District maintenance cost $2,070 Assessment units 8 Total cost - assessment unit for year and month $2.0810 - 5258.75 /year or S21.56 /mo. /lot tone 2 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section G and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5 Assessment Dia ram A copy of the prop.ised assessment diagram is attached to this report Ind 'abeled •E.hlbit A•, by this reference the diagram 1s hereby incorporated within the text of thi: report. Existing Annexation New Tonal estimated annual D1str!ct No. 21 Total maintenance area - Sq. Ft. 0 0 0 Assessment units, acres 380,639 3.55 380,643 Total cost ♦ assessment unit for year and month 0 x T.30 X80; 643— e S 0 /year 0 /mo /acre Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section G and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5 Assessment Dia ram A copy of the prop.ised assessment diagram is attached to this report Ind 'abeled •E.hlbit A•, by this reference the diagram 1s hereby incorporated within the text of thi: report. S• y • sECTIW 6. Assessment ' Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all �,f• lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel L` for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or parcel In xr tone 2. ((C tl� The City Council will hol,' a public hearing in June, to deterrine the In, actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessa ^.nts r'Ctlred 41 by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. is x:- fiECTICW 1. Order of Events .- 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of Crty Engines:Is '`' Report. 4 ? 2 City Council adoots Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets ., public hearing dati,. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer file; a report with the City Council. S. Every yea- in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and al approves, or modifies and approves the individu assessments. ; J r U R 1": Eva w. r: properties and tagrovenxnts to be Included within Annexation No, 21 (Zane 2) to Landscape Maintendnce District Nn. 3: PROPERTIES wti n PROJECT ACREAGE OR 87 -41 1.28 CUP 87 -42 2_27 TOTAL 3.55 ' IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION NO. 21 .e Area SQ: Ft.• Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 _ 6th Street 0 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION NO. p I CITY OF RANCHO CIICANIUNGA t1 ! ENGINEERING DIVISION T VICINITY ivIAP llv`ll ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION N0.21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,b10NCA .. �= 7 ;? ENGINEERING DIVISION DI �nt0 ' VICINITY MAP N 3q u RESOLUTION NO. $ 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 110. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION No. 21 To LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. 3; PURSUAkI To THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1072, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tion of convenience requ re an t s t e n maintenance district in the City of Ra operation of those parkways and foe greenbelt purposes by deed or record boundaries of the proposed maintenan hereof Said maintenance and operatior any sprinkler system, trees, grass, lighting, structures, and walls In eonne That the public interest and a of this City Council to form a Cucamonga for the maintenance and es thereon dedicated for common ubdiviston tract map ►ithln the istrict described to Section 2 ludes the cost and supervision of �ntingS. landscaping, ornamental i with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located Mvp roadway rand landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are an file In the office of the City Clerk, entitled 'Annoxetfon No. 21 to Landscape Maintenance District No SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contempiate wo , n the op n on o sa ty unc s o more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense Of the said work ch•rgesble upon a district, which said district 1s assess 2d to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district 1s described as follows All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain 'Hap of Annexation No. 21 to Landscape Mainten ;nce District No. 3' heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory 1nc'vded within the proposed assessa:ent district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 1. Report of Engineer: The City Cnuncll of said City by Resolution o, as approved - thereport of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled 'Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 21, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. 1s on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected saa�e mre an n same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with t.e City Council of said City and said Council will annually -onduct a bearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing.: Notice is hereby given that on July XTT -at hour o •3o PM n__5e City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, arty and all persons having any objections to the work or extent cf the assessment district, gay appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or wily said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof 1s interested, sufficient to identify the same, and mist be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not sham upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described In the protests, then such protest mat contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer 1s the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and Li htin Act of 1972: All the work herein propose s all a one an carry, rou n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. shall SECTION pu—rsuantbllcatconoorf Resolu'o�tot of Intention: �rrn Codetisheld notice shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same. -and. the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before tue date set for the circulation published at inethe City ofThntarlo, Ra orornfanewspaper andacirculated rin the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex DR 87 -a,1, located west of Utica Avenue, south of Arrow Highway, and CUP 87 -42, located on the southeast corner of 8th Street and Cleveland Avenue, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 17 and setting the date of public hearing for July 20, 1988 RECOM EIIDATION It is recommended that City Council. adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No 17 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's Intention to annex the above described projects to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. Analysis /Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's Intent to annex DR 87 -41, located west of Utica Avenue, South of Arrow Highway, and CUP 87 -42, located on the southeast corner of 8th Street and Cleveland Avenue, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation 17 and setting the public hearing date for July 20, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters • -om the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. Resptied, RiN Attachments RESOLUTION NO. 0000-311 A RESOL7fION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEEP.'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 17 TO STREET LIGHTING M4INTENMCE DISTRICT No d WHEREAS, on June 15, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report In writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council 'vr consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified to any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemizev _osts and expenses o sa work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmad. SECTION 2: That the diayram showing the Assessment District referred to end de—sFIFe-37n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa ssessment Cistrict in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained In said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stano as th+ City Engineer's Report for Tfie purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA Engineer's Report for ' Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 17 for DR 87 -41 and CUP 87 -42 SECTION 1. Authority for Report Y c' This report 1s in compliance with the requirements of Article 4. A Chapter 1, Division 15 of '•he Streets and Highways Cade, State of California (Lan.:eaping and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTION 2 General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all Ic's within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary anc usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light Improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of rraneral benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City _ Engineering Division. Reference Is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assesvment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of thi! report to the same extent as If said plans and specifics were attached hereto Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. 7 a- SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred :or street lighting improvement construction. All Improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment Purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is comprised of all Industrial, com- merctal and Institutional projects throughout the City It has been determined that One acre of laid in industrial, commercial and institutional areas deriv:s the save benefit as two assessment units in residential zones. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 1s shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Everpv Cost: Ho. Of Lamps Lamp Size* Lays Annex New Lamp YTD No 17 Total 5800L 47 0 47 9500L 5 0 5 'High pressure Sodium vapor Lamp Size Total Lamps Rate Ho's Total Annual Haint. Cost 5800L 47 X S 8.93 X 12 $5,036.52 9500L 5 X 510.16 X 12 • 609.60 Total Annual Maint. Cost • $5,646 60 2. Total Assessment Units: TTD Assess Units before this annexation • 453 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 - 7 Total Assessment Units - 460 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Menance Cost $5 646.12 - 512.27 /year /unit Ho, o n is n aint str csi7 —' Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. 73 SECTION 5. _Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this s report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", Annexation No. 17. These diagrams are hereby incorporated witnin the . + text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment -;< Improvements for tie District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When unit ,.% are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per ?' net acre. SECTION 7 Order of Events I. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. i 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and c detervines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year to May, the City Engineer files a report with the City council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the Individual assessments. _ yY K tY-1.tt. w` E%IIIBIT W }P Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 17 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: Assess. Mo. of L s to be Annexed Project Acreage 1(riiE— Sg�—g50if[�pp� j. OR 87 -41 1.28 2.56 - -- __- - -- .'.• CUP 87 -42 W7 4.54 - -- - -- -__ - -- TOTAL 3.55 7.10 _ _ r r i n. 4 75- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXATION NO. 17 CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,_r• COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO A is STATE OF CALUORMA V �> im � - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 ANNEXATION NO. 17 c" L• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �= COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO i STATE OF CALIFORNIA T RESOLUTION N0. $8 -39,> A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 17 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highvays Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience requ re an s e n en ion of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundar.es of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing Described work is to be located wTEUn roadway r— iif =o -way enumerated to the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 17 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6". SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplated work, In the opinion of saaiTZTFY—r0ul, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No 17 to Street Lighting Maintenance Distric. vn. 6" MOPS is on file in the office of the City L•erk of said City. ResolutionENo. T— -4. Fas approved of Engineer: h ofnteheiegineeriof worklwhichyreport indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district bourdary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount Ind extent of the assessments aid for the extent of the 4ork. 79 RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION S. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected al-110 saeei me `un n same manner as Cminty taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annuslly with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upan said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6, Time and Place of �i�earin_q: Notice is hereby given that on July 20;'1lJ , at ur o pm in�lre City Council Ch&Tbers at'9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, my appear and show cause why said work should cot be done or carried out or uhy said district should not be formed in accordance with this P.ssolucion of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must Contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City'Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no ether protests or obiections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown Lvon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the ewner of the property described in thu protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the orner of the property so described. SECTION 7, Landsca in and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein propose s all a ona an Carrft roug n pursuanca of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lightir7 Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION S. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma pursuant Lo Saco on o t? Fe Government ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clark shall attest to the sama, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The raily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ohio, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ORDINANCE NO. 351 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY Q701WCm Or THE CITY OP RANCHO CICAWICA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST 70 A1END THE DEVA.OnCW DISTRICT NAP. DVA 87 -05. IRON L0W -NCDSUN RESIDENTIAL (4.8 DWELLING UM1E TER ACRE) TO RICH RESILRNTIAL (24.30 DWmum UNITS PER ACRE) ATTACHED WITH THE SENIOR ROUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT (SHOD) FOR A 5.05 ACRE rARC8L LOGTED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SASE LINE ROAD, WEST OF ARCHIPALD AVENUE, RANCHO Co%WNGA. CALIFORNIA, AND MAIM FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follower SECTION L The City Council hereby finds and determines the followingr A. flat the Planning Couisui,n of the City of Rancho Cucaeoaga. !ollouing a public hearing held in the tine and manner prescribed by law on April 13, 1988, concerning the rezoning of the Property bereimfter described. ,and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner proscribed by law on Pay 18. 1988, and duly batrd and considered the Planning Commission's recorma•dation. E. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this rezoning is consistent with the objectives of the Development Cade of the City of Rancho Cucantnga. D. Thin rezoning will have no significant environmental Impact an provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property Is hereby rtzoned in the manner stated, and the zoning may is hereby cmended accordingly. 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Governaeat Cade, the City Council of the City of Rancho CccartongR hereby approves on the let day of June, 1988, Development District Amendment 87 -05, changing the district daeignation from Low -Vbdium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 96 Ordinance No. 351 ' Page 2 a V to High Residential (24-30 dwelling unite Per acre) rr attached with the Senior Housing Overlay District C (SHOD) for a 5.05 acts parcel located on the couth aide of Baca Lim Road. wort of Archibald Avenue. Rancho Cuctaonga, Wifornis. APHr 208 - 031 -18 and 19. s• Y' t 5 a f C S4 _ S� ORDIN"Ce NO. �a� AN ORDWANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING rAAT DOCUMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 07 -02 SENIOR CITIZENS• HOUSING" CONCERNING THAT PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, NEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECU72 THE SAME O!7 BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. A. Recitals. (1) California Government Code Section 65864 now provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "The Legislature finds and declares that: "(a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other developments to the consumer, and discourage investment in and commitment to comprehansive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. "(b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to condi- tlons of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage privata participation in comprohan- Sive planning, and reduce the economic costs of develop- ment." (Ii) California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as followst "Any city . . . , may enter into a development agreement with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this article. .^ (111) California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides as follows: "A development agreement shall specify the duration of the agreement, the permitted use of the property, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height and g).-;L ordinance No. Page 2 i size of proposed buildings, and provision for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The development sgreamw.t say include conditions, terms, t restrictions and requirements for subsequent + discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, +' terms, restrictions and requirements for subsequent discretionary actions shall nit prevent development of the lend for the uses and to the density or intensity of development set forth in the agreement. . . ." (iv) California Government Code Section 65915 provides that a city may, by agreement with a developer, grant a density bonus over that allowed by the maximum density astabllehed in the Development CL +e and Land Use Element of the General Plan when a developer egress to construct housing for low income senior households. (v) Attached to this ordinance, marked as Exhibit "1" and incorporated herein by this reference, is a proposed Development Agreement concerning that property located generally south of Ease Line Road and vest of Archibald Avenue, in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and as legally described in the attached Development Agreement. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, that agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "1" is referred to an "the Development Agreement." (vi) Concurrent with the adoption of this ordinance, the city Council has adopted ordinances amending both the General Plan classification for the subject property from Low Medium Residential to High Residential and the Development District classification for such property from a Low Medium Residential District to a High Residential District with a senior Rousing overlay. The proposed developer of the property and the city desire to provide through the attached Development Agreement opecific development options and controls on the site which will provide for maximum efficient utilization of the site in accordance with sound planning principles, all in accordance with the above - referenced provisions of law, and to meet a public need for senior citizen housing for persona of low income levels. (vii) on -�ppnorri1_1 113� �� 19880 the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga a duly noticed public hearing concerning the proposed Development Agreement 0� Ordinarce no. Page (viii) This Council hem heretofore conducted a duly noticed public hearing cuncerning the potential adoption of the Development Agreement and said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of thin Ordinance. (ix) All legal prerequ)sitss prior to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. G ' B. Ordinance. NON, THEREFORE, it hereby is ordained by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga an (allows: 1. In all respects as ast forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this ordinance. 2. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and concurs with that Negative Declaration adopted with respect to the project and finds that it has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental quality Act of ` 1970, as emended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and that this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with respect to the project identified in this Ordinance. 3. This council specifically finds that: (a) The location, design and proposed uses not forth in the Development Agreement are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinityl (b) The Development Agreement will produce internally an environment of stable and desirable character, and not tend to cause any traffic congestion on surrounding or access streets; - (c) rho proposed development will be wall integrated into its setting; and (d) The Development Agreement conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4 It is expressly found that the pubil,; ; ;acassity, general welfare and good zoning practice require the approval of the tovelopment Agreement. 3 v Ordinance No. Page S. It in further found that the increase in unit donsity to 75.05 dwelling units per acre is in the best interests of the public health, safety and welfare since the project as contemplated will be occupied by senior households of low income, in conformance with the provisions of California Gc- rnmant Coda Section 65913. y 6. This Council hereby approve* the Development y Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit 01.* 7. If for any reason the above - referenced ordinances amending the General Plan and Development District designations on the subject property do not become effective, this Ordinance and the attached Development Agreement shall be deemed null and vo -d. 8. This Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Development Agreement on behalf of the city of Rancho Cucamonga forthwith upon adopting this Ordinance. 9. The City Clark shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the mama to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in Thl nAi,1,Y Report of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 1988. PASSED AND ADOPTED this __ day nf Mayor I, BEVERLY A. AUTRELET, city clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance vs i..roduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of _ , 1988, end was finally pass d at a regular meeting of t e C --r— y Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the _ day of , 1908, by the following votes ,1 e�y dVm Ordinance No 356 ' Page 5 101 IDOHI'BIT "I" DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 87-02 7 SENIOR CITUENIS naSIM t 9HIS AORENHENT is entered into as of the "Effective Date* rot forth herein by and between METER N. NOORSE, dba NCHRSE DEVELOPMENT (M. ■ sole proprietorship ( "Developer ") and the CITY OF RANCHO C M OMA, a municipal + corporation organized and existing under the lmm of the State of California {1 ( "City•). W I T N E S S E T Ht ' A. Recitals. (i) California Goverment Code Sections 65864 at seq. authorises cities to enter into binding development agreements -Lth persons having legal or equitable inrerests in real property for the development of such property. (ii) California Goverment Code Section 65015 provides that a city may, by agreement with a developer, grant a density bon" over that allowed by the maximum density established in the development code and land use element of the general plan when a developer agrees to construct housing for low income senior households. (iii) Developer has requested City to consider the approval of e development agreement, with a density bonus, pertaining to that real property located entirely within City, the common end legal description of which is set forth in Exhibit •A ", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this raftrence and hereinafter is referred to as "the Site ". (iv) The Site is new zone' wigh Residential with a Senior Housing Overlay District pursuant to the pt.,v'_aion■ of City's Development Coda, as emended to date hereof. Developer and City desire to provide through this Development Agreement more sp•.tftc development controls on the Site which will provide for maximum effit•sct utilisation of the Site in accordance with sGund planning principles. (v) Thp Developer proposes to construct a senior housing residential project, including low inwme units, within the City. Said project contemplated by Developer will require an increase in the maximum density as currently provided In the Senior Housing Overlay District. NO It is the desire of City t3 encourage developments designed to provide affordable rental units for senior residents of the City. In furthetanre of that desire, the City is hereby willing to grant a density bonus to Developer as provided by the terms of thin Agreement. (vii) On , City adopted its Ordinance No. 356, thereby approving thin Development Agreement with Developer and said action was effective on _ Ordinance-No. 356 Page 6 B. Agreement NW. THSREVORB, tha parties beret* agree as follwst 1. Definitions. in this Agreement, unless the contest othcrwice requires. the following terms shall have the following meanings a. "City" is the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga. b. "Project" to the developient approved by City comprised of one L�dred aaventy (170) apartment units, recreational and common area fcoilitiea, one hundred seventy (170) parking spaces and other ameniti¢o on the Site. all as set forth more fully in the site plan for Develpment Review 87 -33 submitted by Developer and approved by City, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked as Pshibit "B" and is incorporated herein by thin reference. The Bite plan attached ac 14hibit "g" includes various conditions of apprmal which are not changed, altered or modified by this Development Agreement unless specifically tat forth herein. The project also includec the records of the applications by Developer, the proceedinga before the Planning Commission and City Council of City on file with the City and all such records and files in these metters are incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. C. Rlualif Ind Project Period" means the first day on which the residential units in the development are first available for occupancy by Qualified Tenants and continuing for twenty (10) years. d. nQualifted Tenants" shall mean persons or houseLolds who are at least fifty-five (55) years or older and are senior citizens as defined in Section 51.3 of the California Civil ode as said sections are written as of the offactive date of this Agreement. "Low Income Qualified Tenants' shell mean Qualified Tenants who also possece an income equal to or lace than eighty percent (847x) of the current County of Son Bernardino median intent as determined by the Federal Department of Housing .end Urban Development putsuant to Section 8 of the United Staten Housing Act of 1937. In the went each rederal determinations of area median income are discontinued, other means to determine the median income. as * etermined vy the City, shall be established for the County of San Bernardino, at eighty percent (ta)lU of the area median income. adjusted for tcmily vies .nd revised aemuel ly. "Affordable Rents" shall mean than rents charged to Loo Income Qualified Tenants, which rent #hall be on an annualized wain equal to or leas than thirty percent (30%) of the eighty percent (e0S) of the current medl• income as established for such Qualified Tenants. per purpo me of this definition, rents V Ordnance No 356 1 Page, 7 charged for all one (1) bedroom mite shall be subject to computation raced on eighty percent (80Z) of the median Income for ■ two (2) perwn household. Rant$ charged for ali two (2) bedroom units shall be subject ^o computation based upon eighty percent (802, of the median income for all oouseholas for tour (4) or more persons. f. 'Effective Date" shall mean the Slat calendar day tollowing adoption of the ordinance sMoviag thin Agreement by City's City Comcil. 2. Recitalo. The recitals are part of the agreement between the partiaa and shall b enforced and enforcesole as any other provision of this Agreement. 3. Interest or Property Owner. Developer warrants and represents that it has entered into an escrow or an agreement by which it In to acquire full legal title to the real property of the Site and that it man full legal right to enter into this Agreement. 4. Binding Ettect nt Agreement. She Developer heracy aubjecta the development and the land described in Exhibit 'A' harato to the covownts, reaervationa and restrictions as not forth in this Agreement. 7ha City and the Developer hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations and restriction+ as eat forth herein shall be domed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the Developers euccxaser• and assig.ua in title or interest to the Development. Each and every contract, dead or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the development or any portion thereof shoal conclusively br hold to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to the covenanta, reservations and restrictions exrreseed in this Agreement, regardless of whether such covenants, raaetvationa and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. City and Developer hereby declare their understanding and Intent that the burden of the covenant$, reservations and restrictions set turth herein touch and concern the land in that the Developer•a legal inteieat in the development is rendered leas valuable therecy. She City and Developer herauy further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants touch and concern the land ev enhancing and increasing the enjoymine and use of the Development ty Qualified tenants, the intended beneficiaries of aura covenants, reservations and restrictions, and oy furthering the public purposes for which this Agrwement is adopted. further, the parties hereto agree what such covenants, reservationa and restrictions benefit all other real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 5. Refationsais or Parties. It in undeisto— that tho contractual relation- ship between City and Developer is such that `evelopar Ie an indepandont party and to not the agent of City for eery purpose whatsoever and shall trot be conaidere. to be the agent of City for any purpose whauwever. O i .Ordinance No 356 Page 8 6. Term of Agreement. The ten of the Agreement shall commence on the effective daft and shall expire twenty (20) years altar the conzencement of the Qualified Project Period, so long as Developer -mains in material compliance with this Agreement. as free time to tine amended. Upon the conclusion of the Qualified Project Period, and the expiration of this Agreement as provided heroin, the Project shall be made to conform with all that applicable Developaent Code provisions. aria Agrement shall be denied to be terminated automatically it Developer does not obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the entirety of the Project within three (3) years of the effective date. 7. Restrictions on Rental Unite. All tenants, occupants, and residents of apartment units in the Project shall be Qualified Tenants. Said apartment unite shell not be rented, occupied, leased or subleased to occupants who are not Qualified Tenants except an provided as follwni a. A person or person who to not a Qualified Tenant, and is at least forty -five (45) years of age. may occupy an apartment wit if he or she occupies an apartment wit with a present occupant who is a Qualified Tenant and who provides primary physical or economic support to such Qualified Tonanti b, A person at least forty -five (45) years of age who is the spouse of a Qualified Tenant may occupy a wit with such Qualified Tenanti and C. A person or persons =der nifty -five t55) years of age may occupy apartment units as temporary tenants for a period of time not to exceed three (3) months during any calendar year. 8. Lev Income Rental Reauirementa. During the Qualified Project Period fifty per (�O1) of the wits !n the Project shall be rented, leaned or held available rot Low Income Qualified Tenants at affordable rents, as dofined herein. Additionally, at least sixty (60) days prior to any increase in rentu rates, as computed by the terms of this Agreement, the Developer &ball provide written notice of suca increase to the City and all affected tenants. 9. Maintenance of Apartments se aentars. During the corm hereof, all apartment mite in the Project shall remain rentu wits. No apartment wit 1d' tbo Project shall be eligibis for conversion from rental wits to conuominiums. townhouses or any other women interest subdivision without consent of the City council 10 On -orte Manager. A full -time manager shall be provided on the Project site 11. Tenant Committee. Residents shell have the right to establish a committee composed of ternts for the purpose of organizing social activities and providing comments and suggestions to the Developer regarding the operation atd facilities of the Project. Nothing in thin section shall be denied to restrict the rights of mdividusla to organize activities and provide ==onto to the Developer Ordinance No. 356 Page 9 12. Suomisaaan or Heterrala end Annml icevzz. prier to occupancy. Developer shall submit to City tow�t wleetion procedures which shall detail the sithods which Developer shall use to advertise the availability of apartments it the Project and screening sechm•iams which Developer intends to ust to linft the occupancy of the apartments to Qual if Ind Tenants and Low Immoe Qualified Tenants. On or before March 15 of each year following the cramencement of the Qualified Project Period, the Developer, or its representative, shall tile a cortifiute of continuing program compliance with the City. Each such report shad contain ouch information as City may require including, but not limited to, the fellwingi e. Rent schedules then in effect, including utility charges (if any); b, t project occupancy profile, including age, resident profile and number of automobiles weed by Project residents; C. A description of all written complaints received from residnntot d. A certification that low income requirements have Dean matt e. A list of substantial physical defects in the Project including a description of repair or maintenance rock under in during the rs�, rting )ear: and f. A description of the phyatcal condition and maintenance procedures for the Project, including apartment units. landscaping, valivaya and recreational areas. City $ '.all be elicited to conduct physical ins;ections of the Project as it shall deem necessary, provided that main Inspections do not tmrca•onably Interfere with the normal oporatinna of the Project and reasonable notice is provided. The City shall tn.ther to elicited to conduct an annual survey of tetidento in the Project in oruer to asneel senior leads. 13. Tenant bele :lion. Contracts Ind Rules and Regulations. On receipt 6f-am application for low income occupancy, Developer shall datercine the eligibility, of the occupancy under the terms of this Development Agreement. Verification of tenant eligibility shall include one or more of the following factoret a. Obtain an income verification form trout the Social Stccrity Actoiniotratlon and /or the California Deparument of Social Services, it the applicant receives income rrm either or both agenciest b. Ootain on income tax return for the most recent tax year; C. Conduct a 1141 or similar financial "arch: / l Urdinanc, No 356 Page 10 d. Obtain an income verifi"tion from all currant employers: and e. It the applicant is unemployed and bas no tax return. obtain another torn of independent verification. Developer shall be entitled to rely on the informrtion contained in the application worn to by the applicant. All agreements for rental of all uprrment units in the Project shall be in writing. The fora of propasaa rent or lease agresannt shall be reviewed end oppr.rved by Lary prior to the commencement of the Qualified Project Period. ' Such agreement shall include all rules and reggulations governing tenancy within the Project. 7be rules and regulations shall include regulations which apecifiully authorize the keeping of wall pets within all apartment units. 14. Termination and Eviction of _shunts. A tenancy may be temibated Without the termination being eeeaed an eviction under the following cirnnstancest a. 'IDs death of the role tenant of rho unit: b. by the tenant at the expiration of the torn of occupancy or otherwise upon .hirty (30) days' written notice; c By abcndoment of the premier■ by the tame[; or d. By failure of a tenant to eztcute or renew, a lease. Any termination of a tenancy otl or than tboae liatea above in his paragraph 14 ah"I constitute an eviction. Developer shall only evict in compliance with the provisions of California Iw and then only ror materiel noncompliance with the tame of the rental agreement. 15. Local Residency. Residency preference shall be gr•ren where possible to app�fcants to the Project who have been residents of she City of Rsncbo Cacamongs. However. that factor shall rot be given priority o e: the other element@ of Qualified Tenant selection a• stated nerern. 16 Hazard Insurance. Developer shall keep the Project and all rsprwementa thereon insured at all tints against lose or damage by Lira or other risk covered by a standard extended coverage .ndorement and suca other risks. perils or coverage is Developer may determine. During Lba tam hereof, the Project shall be insured to itr full insurance replaamant value. 17 Maintenance Guarantee. Develorar shall eumply with LI1 City aointenanca standards meted t.-oa time to time. P Standards and eestrietioa@ Pertaining to uevetouceft of car Real Pr_P.tEty. The tolloving spaMftc restriction mr►11 apply tc the use of thw sits pursunt to thin Development Agreements Ordinance No 356 Page 12 a. Only residential uses of the reel property shall be permitted in the Project; h The maximum density of residential dwelling unite in the Project shall never be greater than 35.05 dwelling units per acre[ c The mnximm height tar the nightet proposed ouitdimg in the Projtr- Wall be fifty -five (55) feat; + <� d. The maximum aize for all the buildinge and the proposed square a footage tar each of the apertneat types located in the Project i shall be as tat forth in Exhibit can &ruched hereto; and e The prraisions tar reservation or dedication of and for public purposes are contained in the conditions for approval of Development Review V -j3. 19. Development Incentives. The City will grant Developer the following development incentives for development of the Projects a. 'me maximum density per acre on tZie site Wall be increased to 35.05 dwelling units per acre; and b. The maximum number of required off - street parking spaces Well se lowered to one (1) park4n3 apace per welling unit. 20. Prol set swafan Aaentries wor senior Citizens. 'be Project open space. building, end indiv -M apartaents shall be designed with phyaicdl amenities catering to the needs and desires of the senior citizen residents. In addition to those conditions set forth in Exhibit ngn hereto, the tollesing physical menitiee shall be substantially included in the Projects a. Elevator service shall be provided to all upper story eparnaents; b. /cal units sba)l be designed for nandicap second; e Aal unite Wall poumse secured entryways off a cnuon enclosed b al lway; d Handrails shall be yrovided in all hallways; e. Building apnea i•als be devoted tar tenant group seetinga; and f. Recreational manitiro Wall include, but not limited to, putting greens and shuffleboard courts. 21. Indeoniticat2on. Developer agrees to and shall bold City led its elected officials, officers, agents and employees harmless tram liability for dmagr or claims for damage tar personal injuries. Including death, and claims tar property damage which may arise true the direct or indirect opirations cf Developer or those of bia contractor, su!rcontractor, agent, =ploys* or other Ordinance No 356 page 12 person acting on nis behalf which rolata to the project. Developer agrees to and shall defend city and its elected officials, officers, agento and employees with respect to action& for demgges "dead or alleged to hove been yused eel reason wf Developer's activities in connection with the project. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims tat damage suffered or tbia alleged to have been suffered by reason of the operations referred Le o &can lied of pprrooved the plans,rspecifications orhothf- oocmeate for the prepared. roj ace. PP or 22. Amendments. This Agrement may Le =ended or canceled, in whole or in part, only by mutual .ritten consent of the portion and then in the manver provided for in Callfamia Government Code Sactiona 658oS at seq. 23. Entorcnenx. In the egivo rtlttanx ,nootles�t provisions De eloper of (or its Agreetent by Developer. r, City shall successor) at tha wddresa of the Projec and by andiilesach violwt?onais not or oddresaad to the address stated in this A reeaent, corrected to the zen. orbif satisfaction n low days may be ream retl to in areln, requires to .era the braatii or default if said oruch or default cannot be cared within thirty (30) days (provided that sets to care the bretch or default must be commented within said thirty (30) days sv!thouti thereafter diligently Per 9=4 y Developer), then City mal. declare a default ender this . \grcment and, upon any sum deuazariuv of default. City any bring any action necessary to speulficelly onforce the obligations of Developer growing out of the operation of this Development Agramment, &pPly to soy court. state car tederal, for in.anctivt relief against any violation b) Developer of any 1 vision of this Agrement, or apply for sue.. other relief as may be app& pr 24. Even oofoDefaulmoreD Developer is %andeereets o under this Agtr�ent upon the happe B a. It a material warranry. representation or see cement in made or furnished by nw.doper to City and is false or droved to dove been false in any material respect when it was made; b. It a Lidding and determination it made by s city following'ab annual rwim pursuant to paragraph 12 hereinabove, upon the basic of good faithbswithiauny imaterialato'.=@ and tconditions compiled f thin has not Agreement, after otica and opportantty to sure as oeorc•.oed in paragraph 23 berainabovet or C. Agreement, after Opportunity 9inotice and Opportunity r terms of this tty tocurean provided in paragraph 23 betainabove. 25, No Gsiver o' um. City does not waive .cop claim of dofaet in p.rformance y Developer Jf on periodic revfrw City does not orfor v or total,& this Agreneot. Kinparfcrnance by Developer shall of b& excused F011" rM Ordinance go.. 356 Page 13 because performance b; Developer of the obligations herein contained would w onprof itable, difficult car expencive or because of a failure of any third party or entity. uthervice provided for�in� i r equity ihi Other Agrementor in City'sregula ,at regulations governing develop.enc agreaents are available to the parties to pursue in the event that there ra a breach of this Development Agreement. No waiver by City of may breach or default under thic Development Agreement aball be denied to be waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 26. Rants of Lenders Under tn•s Agree_sant. Should Developer place ur cause ce be plead arty anexmbreaco or M_ n on the proj set, or any pert thereof, the beneficiary as. aahall of re,,a the right Ceatr any rise during•thec ten ofmthis to, montages, Agreement and he eziecenee of said encumbrance or lien cos A. Do any act or thing required of Developor under this Agremento and any such act or thing done or performed coy Lender shall be as effective es if done ny Developer itself; b. Rsalise on the maturity afforded coy the encumbrance or lien by ezercieieg foreclosure proceedings or roger of sale or other remedy afforded in ld or in egnety or by the security document evidencing the encusbtenco or lien (hereinafter referred to so "the trust dead-); C. lranarer, marry or assign the title of Davoloper to tte If-pect to any purchaser at any foraclasura sale. vbether the foreclosure sale be conducted p"Inlant to court order or pursuant to a power or s4e contained in a trust dead; end d. Acquire and succeed to the interact of Developer by virtue of any foraclosure sale, vbether the foreclosure sell ae conducted pursuant to a court ordat or purewnt to a rower of sala contained in s trust deed. 27. Notice to Lender. City shall give written notice of any default or breach under this Agreement by property Owner to Lender and afford Lender hAgreement opportunity after marvico of the notice tot ~ e. Cure the breach or default within rizty (60) days after service of Asia notice, where the default tan be cured b7 the payment of money; Is. Cure the breach or default within sissy (60) days after service of said notice whore the breach or default can be cured by something other than the payment of sonny and can be cuted within that times or C. Cure the breach or dufeult in such reasonable time as way be required where something other hen payment of money is required to cure rise breach or default and canna. be performed within ti. F Ordinarce No 356 <- Page 14 stay ;60) days of ter said notice, provided that sets to me the breach or default are commenced within a sixty (60) day period after service of mid uotice of default ..n Lander by City i.nd are thereafter diligently continued y Lender. 28. Action by Lander. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Apraeaent, -. a Lender may forestall any action y City for a breach or default wider the j` tens of this Agreement try Developer by commencing proceedings to foreclose its encumbrance or lien on the Project. The proceedings so coaaenced tiny be for °• foreclosure of he encumbrance by order of mart or for forwcloaare of the r, encumarance under a power of sale contained in the instrument creating the l° encumbrance ..r lien. 'die proceedings shall net, however, forestall any each action y the City for the default or oreach by Developer =less: a. They are commented within sixty (60) days after service on Lender of the notice unmerited hereinstoves b. They are, after having been commenced, diligently pursumd in the manner required by lest to completions and C. Lander keaps and performs all of the tens, covenants and conditions of thin Agreement requiring the payment or expenditure of money by Developer until the foreclosure proceedings are complete or are discharged by redemption, eetielaction or payment. 29. Rent Control. In consideration tar the limitations herein provided. City agrees Agreement. that it aball not, due j the term of this Agreent, take art, action. the effect of which will be to ntrol. determine or affect the rents for them low income rental units located an the Project. 30. Notice. Any notice required to oe given by the Lama of this ).grement sball be provided b7 certified mail, re Lunn receipt requested, at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other such addreas as may be later specified by the parties hereto. To Dovolopert Want" Development Co. - 901 Dover Crive, Suite Ila Newport Beach, California 92663 Attentions Peter W. ksourme To City t City of Rancho Mcamonga 9320 Base Line, Suite C P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attentions Lauren Wasserman, City I'Anager Ordinance No. 356 Page 15 31. Attorntvs• Pees. In any proceedings arising from the enforcement �f tbis Development Agreement or because of an alleged braich or default hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover it, mots and its ressonabie attorneys- fees inenrred during the proceeding as may be tised within the discretion of the court. 12. etndrna Briect. Mile Agreement shall bind, and the benefits and burdens hereor anall enure to, the respective parts, -a hereto and their legal representatives, "centers. administrators, succeavors and assigns, wherever the contszt regmtrn• or admits. 33. Appltcabie Lae, Isis Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the loss of the State of California. 34. Partial Imaitaaty. If any provisions of this Agreement shall be deased to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality or enforceaMity of the remaining provisions bereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired theray. 35. Recordation. This Agreement &hall, at the ezpenae of Developer, be recorded in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino. IN WITNESS WBSREOr. this Agreement bas been exaeuted by the parties and shall be effective on the effective date set forth heroiabove. CITY OF PANC1I0 CUQkMNOA Detads By Dennis L. Stout. Mayor Dated: PETER W. NOORTE, dba NOURSS MVELOMM Co.. a Sole Proprietorship BY Peter W. Nourse, Ounet /0 Ordinance No. 356 Page 16 EXHIBIT NA- The land referred to herein is situated in the Stato of California, County of San Bernardino, City of Rancho Cacenonga end is described an follwat PARCEL N0. I t The want 164.24 feet of the east 497.24 feet of the north half of Lot 1, Section 3, Twusuip 1 south. Range 7 west, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. according to map of Cucamonga Lando, as per map thareof recorded in Boot 4, Page 9, of Maps. in the Office of the County Recorder of sniu county. BiC EPIInG IDRLON LUNG Sr=XM WE LIMB AVENGE. The areas and distances of the above- dasaibed property are comprted to the Center Line of all adjoining street@ and roads, as shown on the map of said tract. PARCEL NO. Gt The north 1/2 or Lot 1 or Section 3, Township 1 south, Range 7 went, San Bernardino Base and Meridian according to map of Cucsaonga Lands, as per map recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Maps, in the Otfice of the County RLcoroer of aaiv county. EZCEPPING 7REREPROM THE EAST 497.24 FEET IRMtEAP. Also excepting therefrom that portion lying within Bess Line Avenue. Areas and distances of said land are computed to the center of adjoining streets as shown on the map of sai-' tract. ORDINANCE NO. 352 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RMCRO COMMA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING A REQUEST TO AMMO THE DEVII.OPHSHT DISTLICr NAP, DrA 87 -06. PROW LOd- NSDION RESIDENTIAL (4-8 MELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO OFFICE/ PROMSIONAL FOR A 1.69 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON 79C NEST SIDE OF ARCiIBALD AVENUE. SOUTE OF BASE LINE ROAD, RANCHO CNCANONGA. CALIPIRNIA. AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF The City Coweil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California. does ordain an lollwat SECTION 11 The City Council hereby fiida Led determines the followings A. That the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, follow ing a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed N>y law at April 13, 1988, concerning the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council ban held a public bearing in the time and manner prescribed by lew on Nay 18, 1988, and duly beard and considered the Planning Commissiouls recoturendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That thin rezoning is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. D. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact to provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 21 The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map to hereby amended accordingly. 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Cade, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamon:s hereby approves on the let day of June. 1988 Development District Amendment 87-06, changing the district designation from Low- ?odium R_sidantial (4 -8 dwelling unite Per acre) to Office /Professional for a 1.69 acre parcel located Ordinance No. 352 Page 2 on toe ucat aide of Archibald Avenue, couch of Beae Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. AM 208r031 -17. 54, 55. 56, and $7. `I _ q� ORDINANCE NO. 353 AN ORDINANCE OF THE QTY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO W C%MNCSA. CALIFORNIA. AMMIHG THE DEVELOPKENT DISTRICT NAP PROM OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL (OP) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMERCIAL (NC) MR 3.58 ACRES OF LAND LOMTED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LIFE ROAD AND EELLNAN AVENUE APN: 208 - 202 -13. 14 WH3RPAS, on the 27th day of January, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public busting pursuant to Section 65354 of the California Government Code to consider Development District Amendment No. 8711 and recommended to the City Council d*uial of a change In the district designation from Office/Professional (OP) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) for the property located at the southwest turner of Bart* Line Road and Dellmen Avenue. WHEREAS, on the 18th day of Nay, 1988, the Guy Council held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Gwerment Code to consider the Planning Coaaimion recommendation and public input on the Development District Amendment 87 —!1. NHERPAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California does ordain an followas SECTION is The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has madc the following f indingst 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, nice, and compatibility with the existing land uses in the surrounding areas: and 2. The proposed district change would not have a significant impact on the ewiroment, nor the surrow,ding properties: and -- - 3. The proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has fowd that this project will not create a significant adverts impact on the ewiroment and approves the issuance of t Negative Declaration on June 1, 1988. NON, THEREMPE. BE IT RESv-VBDt /oO Ordinance No. 353 Pafe 2 'mat pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Covernsent Code, that the City Cauncfl of the ♦ - of Bancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the let day of June 116 1988, Developwent District Amendment: 87-03, changing the district designation free Oftt -- ?r jfeaeioMl (OP) to Neighborhood Coacercial (NC) for the property located at the southwest corner of Be" Line Road and Belleau Avenue. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cease the sue to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a nnwepaper of goneral circulation published in the City of Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of R6tncho Cucamonga, Californic. 4 R ORDINANCE NO. 354 aw AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COON= OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ,i CALIFORMA. AMENDING IRE DLYEL0PMENT DISTRICT Mp IRON OMCE /FROMSSIOtAL (OP) TO NEIGII80RHOOD OOHMRCIAL (RC) FOR 3.58 ACRES OF LAND LOCITED AT TRZ SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOHIIA COURT AND lB HIEALD AVM7E - AM 202 - 151 -33 WHEREAS, on the 11th day of Nay. 1988, the Planning Commission held a 'r duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government We to consider the fevelopmeat Agreement and Development District Amendment No. 87-03 and recommended to the City Council adoption of a change in the district designation from O :face /profemeionel (OP) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) for the property to ated at the southwoat corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue. WHEREAS, on the lot day of June, 1988, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code to consider the Plannins Comafssion recommendation and public input on the Development Agreement and Development District Amendment 87 -03. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cutaaongs, California does ordain as follovat SECTION 1t The Rancho Cucamonga City Council bas made the following Ifndingst 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses pormitted in the proposed district in terno of access, size, and compatibility with the existing land uses in the surrounding areas= a.jd 2. The proposed district change would t have a significant impact on the environment. car the aurtuunding propertieat and 3. The proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2t The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found that this project wtll not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and approves the ioauance of a Negative Declaration on June 1. 1988. NOW. THERERIRE. BE IT RESOLVED: P Ordinance No. 334 Age 2 That pursuant to gectioI 65850 to 65855 of the California Goverment Code, that the City Council of the City cf Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the let day of June. 1988. ravelopment District Amenament 87 -03. changing the district designatiom frog Office /Professional (OP) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) for the property located at the southwest corrAr of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue. r: ORDINANCE M0. 357 AN ORDINANCE UP THE CITY COUNCIL UP THE t.ITY UP nANCHO CLCAlOWA. CQrMRNIA, APIR07IN3 THAT DOCUMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 97-03 CONCERNING PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST OORNER UP ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND LOMITA (OORT. RARCAO CUCA(ONTA. CKLIPOR" TA" AND AUTHORIxING THE rAYDR TO EfbCtETS THE SAME ON BUMP OF ihE CITY UP nAMCEO C9tAM7TTA A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code Section 658o4 now provides, in pectinate part. as follows: "the Legislature rinds Bad declares thatt "(a) Toe lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a vast* of resources, escalate the coat of housing and other developments to the consumer, and discourage lnvustment in and commitment to compreheraive planning which would Asks asrimum eff)ciant utilisation of tasourcem at the least economic coat to the public. "Cbi Assurance to the applicant for a davelapaent project that upon approval of the project, the applicant day proceed with the project .n accordance with e=ating policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in wapreheesive planning, and reduce the economic coeta of development." (ti) California Government Code Section 6586 provides. in pertinent port, to foll^ at "Any city . . may enter Into a development agreement with on; person neving a legal or equitable interest in real property for-the - development of such property an provided in W o article. . . . (iiil California Govarruent Code Section 65865.2 provides an follower "A development agaement @hall specify the duration of the agreement, the permitted uses of the property. the density or intensity of use, the maximum beignt and sire of proposed buildings, and provision for wovarvotion or cadiertion of Aand for public purposes. The development agreement may include traditions, termw, restrictions and requirements for subsequent uiscretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terra, restrictions and requirements Ordinance No. 357 page 2 for subsequent discretionary actions shall not prevent development of ;he land for the uses and to the density or intensity of development air forth in the agreement. . . ." (iv1 Attachoo to this Ordinance. marked Exhibit "A" and incorporated haze's by reference, is a proposed Development Agreement, M. 01-03, concerning that approximately 3.58 acre parcel located on the southwest corner of Armivald Avenue and Lnmita Court in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and as legally described within the attached Exhibit "A." Hereinafter in this Ordinance, tfet agreement attached hereto as Exhibit •A" is referred to no "the Development Agreement." (v) Concert*= with the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Council had adopted ardinances amending the Cenral Plan designation for the subjenc property trod uffice to Neigbuerbood Commercial and the Development District designation troy Office /rrofeasional to Neighborhood Commercial. The propooed developer of the property and the City, desire to provide through he attached Davolopvent Agreeasnt specific development captions and controls can the s.ta whini will provide for maximum effi_civat utilixaticu of the site in accordance with sound planning principles, all in accordance with the above - referenced provisions of Ism. (vi) On 5.11 . 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuceaonga held a only noticed public nearing .. oncerning the proposed Development Agreement and b y recommenced to this Council the adoption of the Davelopmanr Agreesent. (vii) Tois Council ona heratoforc conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the potential adoption or the Development Agreement and said public oesr. g was concluded prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. (viii) Ail legal prereq iaitar prig to the adoption of .his Ordinance awe occurred. B. Ordinance. NON, THHtB10RE, it hereby is ordained uy the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as to:loest _. 1. In all reapacto as vet torth in the Recitals, .-rt A. of this Ordinance 2. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga tereby finds and concurs with that Negative Declaration adopted with respect to the project on (p • ),j . 1988, and further rinds that tt bee been prepared in compliance with he Wilernii Environmental Quality Act of 1977, as amended. and .he Cufueiines pronulgatod thereunder and that this Cou..til has revived and considered the information contained in said Negative Decla:atfon with respect to the project identified in this Ordinance. I`— r Crdinance tie. 337 Page 3 3. This COMC21 specifically find, that, (a) The location, design and proposed ..sea cot forth in the Development Agreement are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinity; (o) The Development Agrement will produce within the project an environment of staLte and desirable character, and will sot tend to uuse any traffic congestion on surrounding atreetai eettingi and (c) The pt,posed development will be volt integratea into its (d) Provision sea been designed in the proposes development for both private and public upon *peps ►t least equivalent to that required by the Neighborhood Commercial District. (e) the Drvolopmcnt Agreement conforms to the General Man of the .try of Rancho Cucamonga. 4. it is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare snd good toning practice require the approval ..f the Development Agreement. 5. This Council hereby approves the Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit -A.v 6. If the above - referenced ordinances amending the General Plan and Devalopmant Dintrict aeaignations on the subject property do not become effective, this Ordinance and the attached Development Agrwvent shall be domed null snd void. 7, This CouncA nereoy authorizes and directs the Yryor to execute the Development Ag,emenr on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucmongs rortlmitL upon adopting this Ordinance. R. The City Clark shell certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the Same to be publiahed within fifteen (15) days after its peasappe at least once in Toe Daily Report of Ontario. California, and circulated in the (,try of Pancho Cucmonga. California. 1 I ` /0(0 s ORDINANCE N0. 355 .` AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITE COONM OF THE CITE 07 RANO10 CUGIIDICA, O1LIIDRNLA. pRE -208M ASSSESCR'S DIRCEL MMER 225- 161 -19, 32, 33, 31•, 35. 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55 AND 61 LOCTEZ, NORTR OF HIGHLAND AVENUE. BOOM 07 SUMMrT AVENGE EXTENSION, EAST OF OUR CREEE OTTLIT'T MRRIDOR. AND REST OF THE CoujM /CITY BOUNDARY TO LW UESIDENSIA:. The City Council of d.e City of Rancho Cucamonga. California. done ordain as follwet Sh^•T10N is The City C049ci1 hereby finds and determines the following: A, That the planning Commiacion Of the City of Rancho .urxmonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner preacribod by ivalaw. described- and pra-r%Jng of the property hen this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and arguer prescribed by law and duly heard and ccnsidered amid rammandation. H. That this pre- sooing is consistent with the Gemral plan of the City of Rancho CucwOnga, C. This pre - zoning is consistent with the obj eeavee of the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. D. Thin pr,-zoning will have no significant impacts on the environment. S8CrI0N 2: The described real property in the title of this ordinance is hereby pre-zoned in the Banner stated. and the aoning sap In hereby wanded accordingly. The Rancho Cucanonpp City Council approve@ the is@onnce of a N,rAtive Declaration on demo 1. 1980. - NW. TNRREIORE. BE IT RESOLVEDI 1. Thet pursuant to Section 65870 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the let day of dome. 1988. Development District AmaudLInt 88-03 pre - zoning the property described in the title of this ordinance to LOW Residential. L (� to 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council PROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSPJ]TT AND SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 88- CFO - ar ous amendments to the gn r n.mce regar ng neon signs and window signs. 1. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recosmends approval. II. BACKGROUPD: ThI•, amendment will modify the City's regulations concern ng neon and window signs consistent with the direction of the City Council at their March 16 meeting in response t3 recommendations from the Chamber of Coamrce. The proposed amendment was scheduled for review by the Planning Commission on April 13, 1988, but was continued at the requ9st of the Chamber of Commerce. In their continuance request, the Chamber noted that the proposed changes seemed substantially different from the Chamber's Task Force Committee recommendations. The Planning Commission conducted a public heartn•3 to consider this Ordinance on May 11, 1988 and recommended approval with minor modifications. The Commission's deliberations focused upon three issues: 1. Signs within the public right -of -way - Council had directed staff to prepare language to allow the use of temporary flags, banners, signs and pennants within the public right -of -way for City sponsored special events. The Planning Commission. recommended deletion of these provisions, based upon an opinion- " of the City Attrrney, to preserve the City's ability to prohibit political signs on public property. 2 Interior Neon Signs - The Planning Commission recommended that neon signs located on the interior of a window need not be fully enclosed In a metal frame and covered with plexiglass. 3 Window Sign Area - The Planning Commission racy mended that a msximum limit of 150 square feet in erea be established for window signs, in addition to the limitation of 30% of the window area. CITY C RE: 5 June 1 Page 2 88 -01 The Commission s modifications Crdinance for your consideration. the Cemmfssion heuring. otf�plly subq"d.,, city -PLd 88:OC:ko are reflected in the attached Also attached are 0e minutes of Attachments: MAY 11, 1988 Planning :oamisafon Staff Report May 11, 1988 Planning Commission Minutes Resolution Recommending Approval Ordinance S CITY OF RANCHO CUCALIONGA STAFF REPORT r- DATE: May 11, 1988 MEk TO: Chat roan and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENYIROWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SIGH ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 8B- ar ous awes n s o e gn Ordinance rega-rdTfig neon signs, window signs, and temporary 3fgn3 for City sponsored special events. I BACKGROUND: This item was continued at the request of the Chamber OrTREFr—ce to allow them time to review and address the proposed chcaangdesnare sub tanttallysdifferentafrom those requested bypothe Chamber The proposed changes were reviewed by the City Council at their meeting of March 16, 1988. The City Council directed staff to prepare the attached Ordinance accordingly. Staff has not received arty comments to date from the Chamhsr. 11. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission con uc a pu c hearing, review and consider any comments from the Chamber of Commerce and other public testimony. If, after such consideration, the Commission determines that the proposed amendments are acceptable, then adcption of the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council would be in order. \ fully subm ed, "'- Brad Buller City Planner BB:DC:ko Attachments April 13, 1988 Staff Report Resolution Ordinance / ' 11EM 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 13, 1998 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROW: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner CuG VOt r A 2 i asn I SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 88- Various amen n s To- gn urdinance regarding neon signs, window signs, and temporary signs for City sponsored special events. 1. ABSTRACT: This report presents certain changes to the Sign RTnance as directed by the City Council in response to recommendations from the Chamber of Commerce. II. BACKGROUND: The Sign Ordinance prohibits signs with exposed uo ng, such as neon signs. In response to the growing proliferation of these signs, the Planning Division conducted a survey in June of 1987 and determined that fifty (50) businesses had ilteeal neon signs. %st of these signs were small signs advertising 'Open', 'Coors', 'Pizza', etc., that hung in the storefront window. Letters were sent out informing these businesses of the violation and the need to comply with the sign regulations. Several businesses contacted the Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber of Commerce created a task force to review the City's Sign Ordinance and to make recommendations for possible changes in the Ordinance. The City Planner and staff participated in several meetings with the task force between July, 1987 and October, 1987 The Chamber of Commerce recommendations were presented to the Planning Commission on January 27, 1988. The Chamber's recommendations, together with the cements of the Planning Commission, were presented to the City Council for direction on February 17, 1988. The City Council directed staff to prepare alternatives to the Clamber recommendations and highlight sections Of the Sign Ordinance that my warrant changes. Staff presented concepts to allow neon signs and modify the window sign regulations for the City Council's consideration on March 16, 1988. The City Council concurred with sta Vs recommendations and directed staff to prepare this amendment accordingly. _ rrr ITEN S PLANNING COMMISSION'STAFF REPORT RE: SIGN OROINANCE AMEND, 88 -01 April 13, 1988 Page 2 I1I. ANALYSIS: The attached Council staff report SLIwarizes the azenWnfts to the Sign Ordinance. ' IY. RECOtMATION: Staff recomends that the Planning Counntsston ft ached Resolution recoaaaending approval of Sign Ordinance A+endment 88 -01. uliy ; t /Bgr eer tty P1 nner 88:DC:ko Attachments: Resolution Ordinance ((D- _ ri^ — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAb10NGA STAFF REPORT s IDATE: March 16, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller. City Planner ft SUBJECT: SIOl1 OROIUKE - Review of changes proposed by Chamber of amerce on nued from February 17. 1968) I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council revicw and con"�r 7 aF— 'alternatives discussed in this report and provide direction to staff to prepare necessary apnd*ents to the Sign Ordinance. 11. BACKWUND: The City Council ws presented with the Chamber's rfcommarUtions regarding neon signs and window signs at their meeting of February 17, 1988. The Council raised the following concerns: 1. Signag* should relate to the land use /son*. 2. Ii too restrictive, sign regulations can hurt business. 3. Colors, materials, and .saintanante of window signs should be addressed. After, considerable discussion, the City Council continued this item to allow the Council tip ma to review and consider the Information P resented. TM Council tlso directed staff to highlight sections. of the Sign Ordinance that may need amendcont. III ANALYSIS: A. AAppe�roach: This report presents alternative solutions to aadnsi the City Council's concerns and the recommendations of the Chamber of Commerce regarding neon signs and window signs. The solution to the issues is two -fold. 1. Education - A proactive approach Is oatdtd to educa'a the us6 fea owner of the City's sign r*gulatiors and advertising opportunities: (t3 CITY COUNCIL SI, F REPORT RE: SIGN OADINARCE March 16, 1988 Page 2 a. The Scall Business Guide being papered by the Chamber of Commerce explains the City's sign process and should be wade available to their membership, particularly new members. The City Council could Increase sign permit fees by $2.00 in order to Cprovide a copy or the Sign Ordinance to all businesses with their application package. b. Shopping center owners and th0 Chamber of Commerce should take a proactive approach in educating their members /tenants /property managers concerning promotional campaigns and advertising the practices to let residents know of their goods and services and where to find them. A shopping center owner and /or manager should work with his tenants in developing Joint advertising and special sales or promotional events - all the tenants working together means maxicr advertising benefit at minimum test. Staff would recommand that a cautious approach be taken in amending the Sign Ordinance. Changes to the Ordinance should be considered as °fine tuning' rather than a •major overhaul`. 2. Aesthetics - The issues relative to WAS of allowable s gna + the standards for size and design are best addressed by taking a cautious approach. Staff recoaminds that subtle changes to the Sign Ordinance be attempted first and the results monitored to set if the changes address the concerns of the Council and the rhamber. The next section of this report highlights .rats of the Sign Ordinance where changes may be appropriate. POtOntial Amendments: Extarmat Neon SL S - ,Vending the Sign Ordinance to a I ,ow non s no ust a simple matter of lifting the ban On neon. Then Are two major concerns regarding the use of Staff exposed believes that btht aesthetics otrc•qua!ity* off eoN signs can be adequately controlled through the sign permit process, as are other types of permanent signs, and by adopting design guidelines. The issues of safety Ire relevant to window or other neon signs suspended in midair, interior wtli- mounted, and neon signs with open, exposed tubing. Generally speaking, exposed tubes a:e fragile and can be broken by high winds or physical contact. Improper installation can also result in fire '1`1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF R. .RT RE: SIGN ORDINANCE March 16, 1988 Page 3 Potential. The issue of safety Is discussed at length in tho attached study by the City of Nest Covina (see EAhibft W). ' Staff ncoeamnds that the following standards be considered for external neon sfgns: A- Limit their use to more intense Coamercial zones, such as: - Regional Relate Comercial Regional Ctamerclal c. NItvhlnesho piny Canters, Allowlastaopart of a uniform Sign Progrr d. Business identification only Z. Internal Itaen��_V_M�tSs - Mean sfgns looted 1n 41w s n ron window —mve the same issues nlatfre to aesthetics and safety as externally mounted neon signs. In addition, there is concern regerdfny the number of neon signs, content and sire. Staff would recoaraend the fallowing standards be considered for neon window signs: a. Limit their use to commercial :ones only b. Require totally enclosed installation C. Maxfwm size - 2 sq. ft. d. One per business e. No product Advertlslnj or business hales - must be generic, such as Iker or 'Open' 3. !12! ww si -The Sign Ordlnante reeognlzes the need for vary x odor signs for certain types of businesses to violations s Are regarding the window f foot height ilmltatlon in tM eurnnt regul&tions which the Chamber Crommission have lexprsssed concerna with ithe aesthetics god window signs and the 'ength of time they are displayed, In particular, then were objeCtians to the florescent colors used in painted window signs and the lack of regulations Warning her long they may be dfsplayea. Staff would recommend that the following standards be considered for window signs-. t CITY COUNCIL S F REPORT RE: SIGN ORDINANCE March 16, 1988 Page 4 a. Limit their s:e to re Ail conercisl zones only b. Maximum height limit - 20 feet c. Allow for thirty days /event, 4 events /year yC Colors must be compatible to building design /colors i Paper signs shoule be placed in frames 4M 88:Dt:ko Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Nest Covina Kwon Study Exhibit °/' - NecN: Survey Exhibit 'C' - Window Survey Exhibit 'D' - Map of Commercial Zonss Exhibit 'E' - Sign Ordinance /to CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City k:ouncil FROM: Brad Buller, City Planrzr BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: SIGN ORDINANCE - Addendum Report RECONNENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review and cons Tile a alternatives discussed in this report and provide direction to staff to prepare Ordinance. necessary me andments to the Sign II BACKGROUMI: In addition to those concerns outlined in the previous ui�tholn�theepublicCright- oiAwayehighlighting UCity for events. such as the 10 Year Anniversary, Founder's Day paradts, etc. III. ANALYSIS: Staff would recommend that Council consider allowing TEiP—rdrY flags, banners, signs, and pennants within the public right-of-way subject to the following standards: a. Limit their use to City sponsored special events b. Placement shall not cause public safety hazard c. Comply with California Vehicle Code d. Require approval by City Engineer Respec u11y submitted, Z4de City P an BB DC ko 377 —A Br Buller, City. Planner, announced modifications to this agenda, Items and 0 were withdrawn by the applicant. At the applicants's requests, teas P and T were being continued to the May 25, and June S. 1988 meetin respectively. Items E and F will be heard concurrently by the Commlss as well as items G. H, and 1. Items J and Q will also be combined. CONSENT CALENDAR A. TIME EX ENSIC9 FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL IUI 49 - SMiTH - A division of 3 cues o an nto parse s n t Yery Low Development District (2 dwellings units per acre), locate the South side of Strang Lane, west of Carnelian Avenue - APN 1061-271,07 Motion: Moved by Tol:toy, seconded by Chitiea, unanlrwusl;� ried, to adopt the Consent Calendar. \ PUBLIC •4EARINGS 8 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SIGN OROInANCE AMENDMENT 88 -01 - CITY � - ar ouz amen cots to t e gn rd nance regtr ng neon s gns, window signs, and temporary signs for the :Ity sponsored events. (Continued from April 13, 1988) Brad Buller, City Planner, presented the staff report. He advised that the Chamber of Commerce is requesting that this Item be continued in order that the Commission ana the Chamber could meet i' a workshop foram. Commissioner Tolstoy pointed out that the original Sign Ordinance allowed the sign area to not exceed 6 feet, end the amendmen• allowed up to 20 feet above the finisned grade. He asked for an example of whero� this might occur. _ Mr. Buller explained that there are a few instances .n the larger existing shopping centers where the architectural design included higher windows. The amendment was intended to not only address signs on now facilities, but those on existing businesses as well. Commissioner Chitiea pointed out that the amendment provides 30% as a minimum coverage for temporary signs but does not provide a maximum. She felt a maximum should be included. Mr. Buller concurred a maximum should be added. Planning :ommission Minutes - �r,� -2' Mty 11, 1988 Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, advised that If the City were to stipulate any exclusions to the placing of signs within rights -of -way, such allowing placement of temporary signs by the City. It could not legally prohibit the placement of political signs within those same signs withinyrights- of.wayais to excludetallesig proliferation Of po11.1w1 Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. John Mannerino, representing the Rarcho Cucamonga Chamber of Cummerce, indicated that until Just recently he was under the impression that a workshop would be held with members of the Planning Commission and Chamber of .ommerce in an effort to address the Chamber's concerns with the Sign Ordinance Amendment and that this hearing was to be continued. The following Individuals addressed the Commission in opposition to the Sign Ordinance Amendment as presented. It was the opinion of those addressing the Commis allowed. Sion that florescent window signs should be They were also in support of a workshop between the Chamber and the Commission. Larry Rosenthal, owner of a Foothill Boulevard Coffee Shop Vic ArmeJo, owner of the Pet Stop Mitchell. CraigMefferd, 8724 EinF`eoth111anRanchocCucaaonga Stella Medley, 8637 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga (Sweet Nerchantile) Cheryl Mefferd, 8724 E. Foothill, Rancho Cuc Irving Yoorhols, 5921 Y1 amonga Ila Drive, Rancho Cucamonga (Sunrize Market) CaBob 9166 Foothill, RanchooCucamonga Cucamonga (Carlos Hair Design) Dominic. Foothill, Rancho Rancho Carpet Painter) Danielle Morasse, 9455 Hemlock, Pet Stop, Ranco Cucamonga Lynda Unger, Star's Fitness Center, Rancho Cucamonga There were no further coantnts, therefore the public hearing was closed. Chairman McNiel stated that he was unaware of any discussion which may have toad the Chamber of Comuerce to balteve that b workshop between the Commission and the Chamber original posture of the weutd take place. He pointed out that the Planning Commission was that the Sign Ordinance remain to Its original state, whlth is more restrictive than the amendment now being proposed. He adviseo that undergoing Its current rovist the ordinance was on at the direction of the City Council. Chairman McNiel asked for clarification of one Issue raised during the public hearing relative to temporary window signs to businesses within the Office /Professional category. Planning Commisslnn Minutes ltq 3. May 11, 1988 Mr. Buller advised that temporary window signs were allowed In Commercial designations only. He stated that It was a concern at the City Council level that office p.'oJects are not designed for retail advertising and window signs detract from the office /Professional image Of a center. Commissioner Tolstoy pointed out thet Rancho Cucamonga is a city with almost 95,000 citizens, which would seem to promote the prosperity of any healthy business. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that interior neon signs should not be required to be fully encased. He also suggested that In the design of their neon sign, a business should be allowed to use a graphic depicting the type of business. He supported temporary window signs painted in a color to complement a centers color decor, and opposed the use of florescent paint. Commissioner Blakesley stated that everyone wants an attractive 1' community and wants to support prosperous businesses. NO sv Commissioner Tolstoy's position relative to neon and temporary signs. Commissioner Chittea stated that amendments to the Sign Ordinance were 1 that should be window si color palette to complement the colors of the center. She could not, however, support the use of florescent paint. She stated that a maximum space coverage needs to be estabitshed for temporary window signs. She stated that the Council was more permissive in that they allowed the use neon signs and she would not like to liberalize that section further. particularly by allowing the use of graphics. Chairman McNiel was concerned with the Issue of temporary signs for businesses within the Office /Professional designation and suggested that the City Council should review that arcs closely. Ile was not opposed to allowing temporary signs for chose businesses. Commissioner allowin su portbusin ssles 1n the aOffice /Professionalh centers twas that fthey were to complement and be ancillary to those uses He questioned if they met tnat criteria why they would have to attract from the outside. Chairman McNiel asked for a consensus relative to Internal neon signs. Cenmiasioners Tolstoy, Blakesley, and Emerick supported the use of neon without the requirement of its oeing encased and allowing graphics in the design. Chairman MCP1el and Commissioner Chities were opposed. Chairman McNiel then asked for a consensus relative to colors for temporary signs. Planning Commission Minutes / -4- May 11, 1988 Commissioners Tolstoy, Emerick, Chitlea, and Blakesley supported the use Of contrasting colors to complement the color palette of the center. Commissioner Chitiea clarified that the City Council should discuss this issue further with the business owners. Chairman McNiel stated he was not opposed colors• to the use of florescent Mr. Buller suggested that an alternative would be to develop a policy with regard to temporary sign colors as it might be too specific to define color ranges within the ordinance. Motion: Moved by Chitfea, seconded by Tolstoy, to direct staff to forward the Sign Ordinance amendment to the City Council with the recommendation that the Council consider Section ; and 4 !or possible modifications based on City Attorney advise, and possible modifications to the neon sign provisions. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOi,STOY, BLAKESLEY, EMER:CK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried C. ine acr Ito 0.29 acresefor tParcel c2 and 0.89 acres for ParcelsIze the amt the se Oistrtct of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan located at the s thwest corner of Klusman Avenue and San Bernardino Road - UN 208 -15 24 (Continued from April 27, 1988) 0. ENVIRCNMCNTAL SESSME sub v s on Boulevard Specific la of Klusman Avenue (Continued from April Chairman McNiel announced applicant. E ---- ••••••- •�•....� .v,r aauVY - npYANE77E res o a10 111-0 1 Farces in the rootnil Subarea 3, located at the southwest corner X�19n Bernardino Road - APN 2n8- 151 -24 at�this item had been withdrawn by the -a, nuuir" iuN - PARCO - A modification to an approve s to pan or air" , square foot neighborhood retail center located at the southwest to er of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue in Subarea 3 of the thill Specific Plan, Community Cammerclal, on 3.245 acres of land - PN 208. 301 -15, 16, 17. 7. VARIANCE 88 -05 - PARCO - A request to allow a reduc rear yard Planning Commission Minutes -5- 11, 19SB RESOLUTION NO. 88 -97 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 88 -01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR NEON AVD WINDOW SIGNS WHEREAS, on the 11th day of May, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Cude. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following ni n ng—s 1. That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and 2. That the Amendment will provide for development within the District to a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City; and 3. That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or est.nsion of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required with the District. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this protect w not create a significant adverse effect on the environment and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on May 11. 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RtSOLVED: I. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Sign Ordinance Amendment 88- 01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Sign Ordinance Amendment 88 -01 to mndify the Municipal Code per the attached Ordinance. raDL .r ;A, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION RE: SIGN ORD. AMENDMENT 88.01 Y . APPROVED AHD ADOPTED THiS I1TH DAY OF PAY, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONna I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introdurai, passed, and adopted by the F1anning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cowaission held on the 11th day of Nay, 1908, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE a3 0 el "I i± Y A ORDINANCE NO. 5� AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 88 -01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCA40NGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR NEON AND WINDOW SIGNS AND ADDING PROVISION FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS FOR CITY SPONSORED SPECIAL EVENTS follows: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as SF' IN 1: Section 14 08.030 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as follows, f d-and graphics: of not more than eight stral the extreme limits of the wr together with any material a of the display or used to d1 structure against which it i framework or bracing that is case of a two- sided, multi -s computed as including the ma any ground position at one t "Area of sign" shall be computed by 1 single, continuous, rectilinear perimeter nes, or a circle or an ellipse, enclosing representation, emblem, or other display, m foaming an integral part of the background tiate the sfi n from the backdrop of ed, but not Including any supportlnq ly incidental to the display itself. In the or three dimensional sign, the area shall be single display surface which is visible from INK 77, \'J11\ a1N aorvmuaLLaTrsawnNpcalriH L c..w.... af01Y1DUAL LLTUA AWN 9909 WMI 9ACXGAOUNa Determining \alasa,N cN14"w ►hdAq W -- a4\an.LUU�I w..n Jwlrlu Sign Areas CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. RE: SIGN ORD. MEND. 88 -01 Page 2 5 s SECTION 2: Section 14.08.380 of Chapter 14.08 1s amended to read as follows: a 14.08.030 Window sign. 'Window sign' means a sign painted, attached, gl o ued, or erw se a xe co a window or located wfthlr three feet of the interior side of the window or otherwise easily of rble from the exterior of l the building. follows: SECTION 3: Section 14.20.070 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as 14.20.070 Neon signs - exterior. Hoon tubing may be permitted as a sign mater a n ax er or monum —nf sTand wall signs subject to the following provisions: A. Permitted only in the more intense commercial zones: Comeuriiy Coaoercial Regional Related Comerclal Regional Commercial B. Exposed tubing is prohibited. Neon tubing shall be fully enclosed in a metal frame and covered with plexlglass. C. Within shopping centers, neon signs , be allowed only as mm part of a Uniform Sign Program. D. Such signs shall be 1lmttrd to business ',intlflcatton only, and may include graphic symbols. follows: SECTION 4: Section 14.20.071 1s added to Chapter 14.20 to read as 14 20.071 Neon si ns - interior. Neon tubing may be permitted as a sign mater a or n er or w n ow s gns subject to the following provisions: A. Permitted in cownercial zones only; B. No more than one neon window sign shall be permitted per business. C. The sign area shall not exceed two square feet and shall not exceed 20 feet in height above finished grade. D Such signs shall be11m1ted to generic messages, such as OPEN or PIZZA g No product advertising or business identification 1s allowed. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. " RE: SIGN ORD. MEND. 89-01 Page 3 toilows: SECTION 5: Section 14.20,080 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as 14.20.089 PareitteJ st ns - Resldentlel ].ones. The following signs ? may be perm e n to rem en a zones su F0 -'We e provisions listed: (Chart remains unchanged) follows: SECTION 6: Section. 14.20.100 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to ream as 0- 14 "U'1VV rermrcct:a sr ns - coamoreial and Office Zones. The following s gns say a perm ed�n a cemeonc a an a ca zones sublact to the provisions 1lsted: (see revised chart ittached) SECTION 7.' Section 14.20.110 of Chapter 14.20 1s amended to read as follows: -- 14.20.110 Permitted s1 ns - Industrial Zones. The following signs may be perm e n e n as a zones su ec a provlstont listed: (Chart remains unchanged) follows: SECTION 8: Se%tirn 14.24,090 is added to Chapter 14.24 to read as 14.24.090 Stnn color. Sign colas should be compatible with the building arc ec ure. n shopping centers, sign color should compliment the color scheme for the center. The use of garish or flourescent colors 1s considered inappropriate. SECTION 9: This Council finds that this amendment will not adversely effect the env tronment and hereby issues a Negative Declarati m. A� r� V C. ..�. MAXIMUM ""mum RUAtwt CLAMS "To WUy mwAttA wOt11R "To AwnbM.lb •. b Iri et tfw v.1MH wotuR•f•ol.ow. IM txt . h w ♦. Wo yN otlY ilpisuw t Ituf e. uN to w•y I.�e.r • o♦.Iw.0 of UI t.. few est to 1 :dt p�N fNl b iv IINt n.. of .M Is t ffw1 of RN. w.0 .M .ro ow+n..t .M w�.n 99F tw Ytfwl u,Alwt .0) dwlpbd tonp.tCL •'•� OI. p r1.e1 tl qan Ml ♦IIMINb.l.ewww. .w.rrl b.tq.. • wun b yweod alw.b tw IU •• w01°y� y) wt weplb wtl "U .ct jf or..lorN Nt +�elr.t. r pblb:.tv.eV• of lm..enwl W to t bob nw. oa nb l . W.t MW lw f Uw ef.Itl1 H WIWpef. tt �IUw •e� eAro b �tA - el f M -1 b o lM vev, t . f. bOua.nWuMw tla nb•. wule.w d fw.a r Mrbb ar.t il d. feel . . f nm• . tlMu NMtloh lool000, ..tw h. 'N, UwltM to I.o wNtifk.lbo m . I W lbae U I I w bw. of tb a. 1.1 ad too t Mm, 1 wee. to,00m lb. dwltn l.+br wdb) of wtw toNbl..t.n0 tomp.ltew to tl- Mlle of . eo uw centre Ilawrl .M IrH dllfrxl bed wl eW A '� �o.IPMf..t bd Dut Con1.N�lA. wM d. tooto, u Mb�R.1 drlX..d M t�btlbel ,Wvot .1 N. w.b� we.en...• b4 w pu..b w..H t0 W e.Nn.. tl gore fNl tpbtfwt .• AU WOPH e.ow for teeedWwrl .t♦ ptp.s fw W wwu M� Vt. ele..l t. W tow. tow W.bdw N., mb wl♦ d Ib Vw be.tb. ebA Y bb�af te.,e.. 40E, I.Nw N. Mec.. d Aom.M— hb♦E.! Mlwolh.A 16 qw1. fbl W pear>se OY'. o ♦MVe.N bd Ne ..u1.N♦1. eoefl M�. h atf pl.ror. Nd amt W wml Ww0 ♦ eHw 1 /Nee wt•. nv. C. CLAW NCR tliAWUY mumuM IIAROIUIO lim" ♦ RZRAW1 17rg RUOtlRR MR ARtld MW fOW 6rfwbdbf IIf d w f0« d Iblwpjw.Oar. 0. A mwdlxl Op pqI0s f« 1W i, MYwrY irwnn.t" w an pb.lnr b" on .Yb w .Wwbr. wbrw +I[A r b W yrwi, w x.r. bdm to W rOQabd Y w 1w d (mit" pmf.vh..l IYYrl.x. 111.11 b.Nrldwl fdtlp Oxrb YI b ««d N qev. f.W b }b0 all llxar NO xrbw. m.fnx Wxl. Tlr w +wNr O110 praaOd 1�0 w Wrlt prxwdl of YO It.wWOYI Lvu W .rYl /1R MI tyb /Ixt pwOO•«IN••b U.st.14.01� oulrw d f Nnb bWbL•rw Mllw NU W .eJ+.l b Ixrw b1 w ail prywl. Old 4vGVw btrot of Ier Ordbler.. Tw W OH«wbd O/ If pain f «I LV b t f«I drxlwl r IOd1lflYy w wr d w prN.wbrol W tlp�m Yd1 Wr O.Mv O0"'a"' dnio% A, rwb.. W «I� rYe. lYl W pwa tW OA "It" b lW�b{•tlM I~t Yw. W wr ®stln. Br Wrol.ry fAV W rdkvW It qur. fxl Upblfwl L bbdd W 1 W,,1 ON(wwi rWbW lnmudtl YvYx 0 Ol/• NO W bmxwelb brad W NY W W bald IWe LL wdrl I1Wl b n nuMwr MW Oo.tl OM .eca 0, Orwhetd for b(0Itl11 i1 bovu bl. 6 IY01 NUbYbtdtlbp. bf to--%d aaL`ly« d wM edbM• M IO`.rL +t n OOws 0« bYlb« wr/ .W W Nve Y M dbbki. CxaWpl4dN i IrcA b Nlpll W r(Or Me Y f «w wOtl f1 "o 1111. n: WI ro en. the vidt.W of i 1• • WOIIfrWbw nOOiNw ed b Ixd Y .301W •�• W hl.kd f 4'u. Ml •wldwwe.nl b. b4 W "fl fMNiw .1 IOW -Ulm br W '.4 ft 4luO MI Up b l f«I MAt4.r ..1 b Oel MO« prrw W O1Wr Dha •IIs ..fwd • bW Of IN W Orlb I4rl. fxl lat O. As.[ blrl+r M011x(rww CO. f «.ub pOAp c � a. w It." wU gI.O,I.U, 541"'l rra4 rol b.0 It 40 W e0I1W U /WOblm101wb•Id. I • L rl .f I Il .ILiblr. fd dfw. I «L lfM wO w 1.b OOta- t Iwn fxl Alt4 AV w "OD,ve1bF1 e tp «rl wb0>v N l i0.� 'xl•I «i«or «npalbllK 1{w AdrxlWwwnl trwwd We11, • vb6tw I w b u%V. +�Jr CWp YAXMUN NANUN YUN MARKS W A ;IN NLM]NT f'fll "PC NUYtCN ttlM AttA i l {. peOUVYe TnfM Nery a eeoe. be W OJ N. {owe frl Net W eene0 Ii od ey\ Nrn ae eN mb tl� Ue i1 uiNn W fW Weave fwAw Ua YaY.ees forpNMrlu 4efM. r tines e+a0) noa• 1 L TYeper)11Yd)s Ilel Y eewN tr e. rr eNtw /.0 b Ua11N Ie Us{srer) wee enl W Neewe{ fwl Wave fY.YMd b NYrN {CL of W rbre {MM W e4A� =1 1'n �. ttne 1N erue feel nJe' e tk. b p~t N tlW fT1� 0. 1'aallW YfSaaaeY errs ob. �1 "� .�• 1 e. fiYe awl b eeePUY e1N liWf 1: �! l ewWeYe. 4 NIWrw eyn iJ b YNe1 N M ane ;iy N44eeee NMieY paaN4{ )eerl ru e.a eev weel W W M perallW e11N. -.�{ 1{ JYe of eeeNrr eeM w�l ^.\ e. Yetr e'Pweee�yeN lebaWd C' Y lee/Yt Ileaw fw a aew ).eaYIW f. 6rtlerw 'e 'j' Upm 4eebparl of • Mleeel We1i�/ weler' • aaeep4rl eb. p•o� a efeU b Nwtpp eM a Ml e7 Ur .1 y Crlw WWeW.w• +aU IHM fwntmJtlaM It iP^+b Ilk else Wall 1�b1 C11h1)WWY e'oeeWleel pryrew. S. IIOM lbelen Upu. MebpeeW of a tiwN Nrler • euepluel to pgna htl M hrebpetl ed epawe0 h UM )IUalY OmeUIY Nhe N u7r Q1 )Newt M U bW'.j ii Nof 4 fkaabM e1W Ua wrwn foNN .1 p aaarpluJ ib yn W.lt P wW aIb p ntpM lCity eel 4. d �•1 eeerv.dWe elU r i si r „ „ *n CI'PY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02A rwno,n wa41xm.11ea - A request to amend the enera Finn an se p rom Medium Residential (8 to 14 Dwelling Units Per Acre) to Low Medium Residential (4 to B Dwelling Units Per Acre) on approximately 15 acres of land Located north of Highland Avenue, south of Lemon Avenue Extension, and west of Deer Creek Channel APN: Portion of 201 - 271 -34 and 41, and 201 - 271 -42 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPHEN'. DISTRICT ,WNUM&NT - - - A request amen Development s r c Map from a um liesldential ( 8 to 14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Residential ( 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 15 acres of land located north of Highland Avenue, south of Lemon Avenue extension, and west of Deer Creek Channel, APN: Portion of 201 - 271 -34 and 41, and 201 - 271 -42 RELATED FILE: TT 13890 I RECOMMENDATION: Uphold the Planning Commission recommendation to approve eneral Plan Amendment 88 -02A and Development District Amendment 88 -01 by adopting the attached Resolution and Ordinance respectively and issue a Negative Declaration. II. BACKGROUND: At its meeting of May 25, 1988, the Planning_„ _ onn ss on determined that the proposed request is consistent with the General Plan and would not have a significant impact on the environment. In addition, the Commission indicated that certain buffering techniques should be explored, at the develoment project level, between the subject project site and the approved multi- family project to the west. The proposed amendment is in keeping with the City's development Pattern within the surrounding area of the project site and the requested reduction to !and Use Density will reduce potential environmental impacts. �3 v CITY COUNCIL STAFF WORT GENEML PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02A June IS, 1908 Page 2 Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission recommendation to approve General Plan Amendment 88 -02A and Development District Amendment 88 -01 by adopting the attached Resolution and Ordinance respectively and issue a Negative Declaration. Res lly su ted Bra Ru City a er Minutes of the May 25, 1988 Planning Cointasfon Meeting Planning COMission Staff Report for May 25, 1g88 General Plan Amendment Resolution of Approval Development District Mon en. rdirance ;l There were no further public comments. e' Cammfseioner Tolstoy proposed that as part of this amendment the Planning CommiSSion consider exterding the median from its current. termination point at Street and the 24th Street tot Cherry VAvenue and that median be be however• Lower Loop Road. Commissionn direct staff to exploreconstraints; Possibilities. The Commission concurred with this direction. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by 9lakesley, unenlmousty carried, to continue Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 08428 and Etlwanda Specific Plan Amendment 88 -01 to the Planning Comrsission meeting of June 22, 1988. F G tma51RULTI DN A- request CO amen t ! an Se N M_ent_ _0rt ! eneraw 42-26 acreseofuland. located o tno north Ofd Highlandda enaa southroofmLemon Avenuo extension, and west of Deer Creek Channel - APN: 207- 271 -34 (portion), 41 ( pertion) and 42. Des gnatfOh- 07— tedium n Residentialo torn Low- Mediumo Residentlaltr on approximately 42 26 acres, located at the north side of Highldna Avenue, south of Lenon Avenue extension and west of Deer Creek Channel - APN: 201 - 271 -54 (portion), 41 (portion), and 42. Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner, presented tha staff apart. Chairman HCN1el opened the pub,tc hearing. project. Mariposa. rn lalr gave tf Mr. Andre son concurred ththe Res and Approval w Conaltlons a There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Chitiea commented that it was nice to see a request for a decrease in d- nsit,, come before the Commission. Planning Commission Mtiutes -3- May 26, 1988 Commissioner Tol:toy concurred. He pointed out that th0 property to th� west k of this Project contains an already approved Nedimm High density project which contains two and th•ee story structures. He felt that sensitivity to the density transition should be given to the tract map for this project when it Is submitted. Motion: Moved by Emerick, seconded by T015toy, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment *- 88 -02A to the City Council. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIFL ti NOES COK41SSIONERS: NONE ABSENT COMMISSI0. {7ERS: NONE - carried Motion: Moved by Emerick, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and Development District Amendment 88 -01 to the City Council. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS EMERICK, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIkA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Ao5ENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried N ENViRONMEN7AL ASSESSMENT AND- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -24 - GERBER CH �6N� . - e eve opnent o a -are .ac -ty on 1.98 acres of land w,thin the Low Density Residential 0. itricr, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Turner 6e ue - APN: 1077- 041 -57. I -1 IVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11311 - GERBEI N - su v s on 0 1. acres o an NO 11.11V 15 n the ow Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) l! _ at the southwest corner of Base Li AP N: 1977- 041 -57. ne Road and Hermosa Avenue - Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. She advised that St,. dard Condition 0 -7 of the Resolution should be checked to require Notice of Intention to form and /or join the Lighting and Landscaping Bistr' I. Chai-man McNiel opened the public hearing Planning LCMlssion Minutes -4, May 25, 1988 M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE May 25, 1988 t TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission, FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY. Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROINENTAL ASSESSMENT' AND GENERAL PLAN A4ENCNENI 88 -02M KXT - regUes o Aacn a an se TTiiFnF-0T-Vre-7k-n-e-r-&1 Plan from Medium Residential (8 -14 dulling units per acre) to Low- Nedit® Residential (4 -A dwelling units per acre) on approxiabtely 15 acres of land, located north of Highland Avenue, south of L--son Avenue extension, and west of the Deer Creek Channel - %PH: Portions of 201 - 271 -34 and 41, and 201 - 271 -42. ENYIRC.4VENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEKLOPMENT DISTRICT -e' 7r'F1 bt�t - - r> quos anent 115 i c, eve Upa -i s r c P e—m-*-M= Residential (8 -14 04al)ing ;nits per acre) to Low -Medium Residential (4 -8 dwe'lin99 units per acre) for 15 acres of land located north of Highland Avenue, south of Lemon Avenue ex.Egsion, at.d west Pig the Deer Creek Channel - APN: Portions of ?01- 271 -34 and 41, and 201 - 271 -42. RELATED FILE: TENTATIVE TRACT 13890 I. PdOJECT ARD SIT: DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundina lane! nee ....!' ncrcn - Yaccnt, PropostTSM -91e Family Low- Aedirm Development (1T 13390. 4.2 dwelling units per acre); Low -Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) South - Primrr'ly Vacant with the Exception of 2 Vacant units per acre)e(Pr posed Freeway, Route 30 dwelling ht - way) South of Highland Avenue - Single Family Residential Development Under Constructimi; Low - Medium Residential (6.9 dwelling East - Vacant (San Be-nerdino per ounty Flood Control Settling Basla, Deer Creek); Neditm Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Vacant, Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre). Approved 765 Condominiums (Tract 13823, 17.9 dwelling units per act) ��� ITEMS F A G PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 88- 02A/ODA 88 -01 - ACACIA CONSTRUCTION May 25, 1988 Page 2 B. General Plan Des1 naticns: Froject Site - F01"um—Re—s7dential (0 -14 dwelling units per acre) North - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) C Site Characteristics: The subject site is undeveloped and covereedw with a natural alluvial scrub vegetation, as are the adjacent areas. The proposed freeway (Route 30) right -of -way abuts the subject site to the south along Highland Avenue. In addition to this General Plan/Development District Amendment request, the City is also processing a Tentative Tract Map application (IT 13890, see Exhibit V) for this project site (Planning Commissioa review scheduled for June, 1988). II. GENERAL PLAN ANALYSIS: The requested amendment proposes a land use es Mg n& ange from Medium Residential to Law - Medium Residential In an area which is adjacent to a proposed major transportation route. ;o The project site is also rated in the northern one -third of the City whe -e densities are planned at a lower range in order to maintain a more rural character than that of the southern two- thirds of the City. "Regionally oriented uses shou the regional transportation ne for transit use according to These uses include parks, she auto centers, and multiple fi Within the residential areas ai Planning practice to locate hi, uses are located near these ma.1 reduce inner City traffic. downward as the distance from Increases, thereby mitigating 1 ,e located in close proximity to k to promote maximum opportunity objectives of the General Plan. g malts, entertainment centers, F (higher density) residential !nt to freeways, it is a typical density residential uses. Such ransportation routes in order to :ally then densities transition major transportation networks vehicular Impacts. In this case, the applicant is requesting a reduction to the density in an area where higher densities are typically requested The following items appear to justify this request: 1 The project site is located in the northern less dense area of the City, and Both existing and approved lower density residential develo;ments are currently present along this corridor (Low and Low - Medium Residential). _ j3S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 88- 02A/DDA 88 -01 - ACACIA CONSTRUCTION May 25, 138B Page 3 Because of these factors, it is staff's opinion that the proposed amendment is consistent with the City's development pattern. The impacts associated with the proposed density can be mitigated at the development project level. III DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMEI,T ANALYSIS: "Late Law requires that Ile development s r c s, e. .Doing 1,dlnance, be consistent with the General Plan (Section 05860, Government Code). if findings can not be made to warrant a General Plan Amendment of the site to a Low - Medium Residential land use designation, similar findings should also be made regarding the proposed Development District Amendment to maintain the requirement of consistency. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: General Plan Amendment 88 -02A proposes a re uc on n land use density /intensity, thereby, reducing potential environmental Impacts and the number of families impacted. Staff has completed the Initial Study and reviewed the Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts to occur as a result of the proposed amendment. It is antfcipated that any issue of density impacts may be successfully mitigated at the development project level. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: General Plan Amendment 88 -02A and Development s r c n n 88 -01 will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. Should the Ccaaission determine that the amendment would promote the land use goals and purposes of th General Plan, the following findings must be made for approval: A. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibiiity with existing land use in the surrounding area; and B. That the proposed district amendment would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. VI CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e a e ort newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to a proper y owners within 300 feet of the project site. 13b r Y v t PLANNING COMMA: GPA 88- 02A/DDA May 25, 1988 Page 4 STAFF - REPORT '- ACACIA CONSTRUCTION VII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning COawission a op e a ac ed Resolution recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 88-02A and Development District Amendment 88 -01 to the City Council and issue a Negative Declaration, thereby designating the project site as Low - Medium Residential. C lly su tted, ner /BB Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "8" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Bract Map 13890 Exhibit 'D: Tract Map 13890 of Specific Project Site Exhibit "E' - Tract Map 13890 Site Utilization Map Resolution 0f Approval for GPA 88 -02A Resolution of Approval for DDA 88 -01 / .32 '�„ st VICINITY MAP N T4 j CI i Y OF RANCHO CUCA PONGA PLANNING DIVISION `39 ITEM: TITLE:!`M`����� EXHIBIT:!&L SCALE: v V NORTH L: I )� /1 L)�d 9INGLL• GAMILY LOW• 61E ,10510t, IAI. I 4 b bulAC, ca &r (TIeN) VACANT r I I project Site M odium ' /� ( to 14 DU's /AC) )�/ H to / VOW � to 8 DWS/ FUTUKr- I W-MAY K/W _ 2 I \/1 VA4WT MealU \/J e- IOVU /,a 90.60 r.ov 46T(uN8 VA5W5 aNCttcm�n�rwctwN) • / � rAMI Y /JM1ghIDEiIAL NORTH CITY OF o�4 RANCHO CUCATI ONG'A TITLE: S �'1irt,►/ PLANNING DIVISION_ EXHITiIT :!W SCALE: !►LS , I TENTATNE TRACT N0. 13890 Project Site ■ CITY ''' //�./ NORTH RANCHO CUCAMO /y" ITEM C�� saSoeU� PLANNING �DIVISI0�1 NGA i --;� —- ERHIBIT:�_ "SCALE:-ktU_ ^_ .. S t II s I HIGHLAND rl�•n ve .wu I♦/ r " v sue_ FORTH CITYOF � -QA4 IAICHO CUCAMOVOA IITES-ftUft' ; TmPLANNING DIVISION EXHIDIT:M SCALE: / T \� \.\.'1 -.tom I _ - ------ - - -- _ I! LM �� - , � = r=te•_, NORTH ITEM. CITI' 0 �U �A e8 -o RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION y y 'J EXHIBIT: !&! SCALE: -AT s RESOLUTION NO. 8 $- 39 J ' A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) 88 -02A, REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE GENERA. PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIOENTIAL FOP. APPROXIMATELY 15 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUE EXTENSION, AND NEST OF DEER CREEK CRAMEL, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APN: PORTI09S OF ?Al- 271 -34 AND 41 (SEE EXHIBIT 'A "). AND 201- 271 -42, AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) Acacia Construction has filed an application for General Plan Aeendoent No. 88 -02A as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as 'the o,)plication'. (it) On May 25, 1988, the Planning Comisslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No 89 -89 recomending to the City Council that said application be approved. (111) On June 15, I988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and cancluO, -d said hearing on that date (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8 Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth to the Recitals, Part 'A' of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing June 15, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The application applies to approximately 15 acres of land, basically an inverted 'L" configuration, located north of Highland Avenue, south of Lemon Avenue extenbion, and west of Deer Creek Channel and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Medium Residential /!(3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -D2A June 15, 1988 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated as Lop- Medium Residential, vacant, and proposed for single family development. The property to the pest is designated Medium -High Residential and is undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Medium Residential and Is vacant (settling basin, Deer Creek Channel). The property to the south is designated Medium Residential and i� primarily vacant with the exception of 2 vacant and boarded -up houses; And (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the Development District and with related development; and (d) This amendment prcmotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative Declaration be issued. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted In the proposed district in terms of attest, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant Impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65650 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 15th day of June, 1988, General Plan Amendment No. 88 -02A. /(W i�M� .. +L: " ,'ro;a •cNy /,:�j ���:�;Y,',��J'� � ,. -n. ".k •!T �_`:Jtt,Xiv'}:: CITY COUNCIL °RESOLUTIQN N0. !!! +, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02A ' r= June 15, 1988 _ _ - `' Page 3i r� r, 6. The City Clerk to this Council shall certify to the aduptian of this Resolution. r. (APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 1988.) /6/-5- Nf� 1 i ��NN'ee, ril�• �r SI /2 Seu.�5,T.IIY,R.7W.,S.B.B. &M. I 1 I I I w6e { .�(o i n }L.LC 11� 1 1 l-J JAK w,w I w �, —• \It0 C y0•� O I K X10' I �A .( nuw •.K 21 IRJ[\. H !/ CPA 88 -02A / ODA 88 -01 CITY OF tTt-ml Exhibit 'A' RAINiCM Cj)CAA iA�OIVC Tnu, Assessor's parcel Map PLANNING DCV& -JN FJCHIBITi SGLEI nts c. ORDINANCE NO., 0 l AN ORDINANCE OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 8841, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF LE140H AVENUE EXTENSION, AND WEST OF DEER CREEK CHANNEL, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APH: PORTIONS OF 201- 211 -34 AND 41 (SEE EXHIBIT 'A "), AND 201- 271 -42 WHEREAS, On May 25, 1988, the Planning Comisston of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code and recomamended to the City Council adoption of a change In the district designation from Medium Residential to Low - Medium Residential. WHEREAS, On June 15, 1988, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code. findings: SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Council has made the following 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2 That the proposed District change would not have significant issacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and approves issuance of a Negative Declaration on June 15, 1988 NON, THEREF0IE, BE IT RESOLVED- That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 15th day of June, 1988, Development District !amendment 88 -01 changing the District designation from Medium Residential to Low- Medlum Residential for those properties located north of Highland Avenue, south of Lemon Avenue extension, and west of Dr.r Creek Channel. r Ig 8 321 Z6 i St/2 Sec.25,TIH,R.7W.,S.B.B.8M. Il I - � O jo ti 9 i' i ll lllL ` N, I � IVII[1 �ry� ILn ILI b; l• wwu OI t. LL ll.Y 1 m GPA 80-02A / DDA 88 -01 CITY OF Iy$ TT:Mt ExhiNt W RANCHO CIK'AMUNGA TM Assessor's Parcel Map PLANNING c7IVb70N EXHIENTI `A' scALc, nts SS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 T0: city Council and City Mancger FRO14: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer � Tye• r Y , BY: Steven Allan, Assistant Civil Engine es, SUBJECT: access Approval rightsFfore driveways for on the thevacation vehicular side of Jasper Street between Lomita Drive and Sierra vista Drive and an emergency vehicular access on Lomita Drive RECOM EMOATION: Staff recommends that the vehicular access rights for two driveways on Jasper Street and an emergency vehicular access on Lomita Drive be vacated and the attached resolution be approved. Background /Analysis The before mentioned driveways will allow access from Jasper Street to the proposed development at the southwest corner of Jasper Street and Lomita, referred to as Conditional Use Permit 87 -19 which was approved by the City Planning Commission on July 22, 1987. Respect 1 submitted, ifs RHM: S/1: sd Attachment /Y7 RESOLUTION NO. b p - 37y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR TWO DRIVEWAYS ON JASPER STREET AND AN EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ON LOMITA AVENUE. as follows: BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga SECTION N That the City Council hereby elects to Proceed under Section 83UJ a seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the 3treot Vacation Act of 1941. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to vacate veh cui Tar access rights for driveways on the west side of Jasper Street between Lomita Drive and Sierra Vista Drive, a City street, as shown on Map AO. V -081 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit 'A' and by reference made a part lereof. SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 6th day of July,Z , at 7:30 P.H., in the Lions Park Community Center Building, located at 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its determining whether said City vehicular access rights are necessary foi present or prospective street purposes. SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to be poste cd onscuously along the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least 40 days before the hearing, not more that 30 feet apart and net less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in tattering not less than one inch in height: 'NOTICE OF HEARaNG TO VACATE VIHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS'. SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservatio—ns a exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest tTie same, and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published 1C days before the date set for the hearing, at least once In The Dail Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City o n ario, Lap rornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. /0 A Metes and Bounds description of the limits of all non - vehicular access rights along the west side of Jasper Street as shown on plat of Tract 8383, recorded in Bouk 116, Page 81 of Maps, Records of San Bernardino County, to be vacated by the city of Rancho Cucamonga in favor of the Sierra vista Baptist Churcht Access It 35 feat wide, the centerline of which is described as followsr Commencing at the centerline intersection of Lomita Drive and Jasper Street de shown on the aforementioned Tract Map! Thence S 0. 31' 50e E along the centarlins of Jasper Street (66 feet wide) a distance of 160 00 feet! Thence S 69a 28' 10• M r distance of 22.00 feet to a point on the westerly curb line of said Jasper Street, said point being tho TRUL POINT OF BEGINNING[ Thence continuing 5 89• 23' 30• N a oistance of 11.00 feet to the right -of -way line of said street, said line being the Point Ending of Access 1. Access 2, 35 feat wide, the centerline of which is described as follows, Commencing at the centerline intersection of Sierra vista Avenue and Jasper Street (66 feet wide)! Thence S 89• 42' 43• N along the centerline of Jasper Street a distance of 14.05 feet to A point of tangency with a curve concave to the northeast and outstanding a central angle of 24. 04' 23 "1 Thence along said centerline curve an arc distance of 105.03 feet to a point on said centarline, a radial passing through said point bearing S 23. 32' 33' N1 Thence S .3• 32' 33- N along Laid radial line a distance of 22 00 feet to a paint on the westerly curb of Jasper Street, said point being the TRUE POINT OF OEGINNINGI .V Thence continuing S 2 32' w along said radial lire IC' s distance of Il 00 fee the et to the right -of -way line of said 6 rte.. street, said lino being the Point of Ending of Access No. 23814 A 2, and thv side lines of said Access 2 being shortened Exp. 12131/8 * or lengthened as necessary to meet said curb line and said right -of -way line. Exhibit "A -1" J N. 87 -SOSAI 15-1 A Mates and Bounds description of the limits of emergency non- vuhicular access rights along the south side of Lomita Drive as shown on plat r of Tract 8383, recorded in Book 116, Page 01 of Maps, Records of San J Bernardino County, to be vacated by the City of Ranrho Cucsnonga in favor of the Sierra Baptist Church; y A 26.00 feet wide omergency access, the centerline of which in described 7 as feilewe! I Commencing at the centerline intersection of Jasper Street and Lomita 7 Drive (60 feet wide); Thence S 890 28' 10• N a distance of 87 00 feet to the beginning of i a curve concave to the north and subtending a central angle of 160 40' 53•; Thence continuing westerly along said centerline curve an arc distance of 58 23 feet to a point of reverse curvature with a centerline curve concave to the south, a radial passing through said point bearing N 16° 09' 03" E; Thence continuing along said centerline curve an arc distance of 57 38 feet to a point of tangency; Thence S 89. 42' 43" W a distance of 46.80 fast; Thence S 0. 17' 17- W a distance of 10.00 feet to a point on the southerly curb of Lomita Drive, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING] Thence continuing S 00 17' 174 W a diatanco of 12.00 feat to a point on the southerly right -of -way line of Lomita Drive, said point being the Point of Ending of the emergency access. T No. 23814 814 * Ekp 12131189 J N 87 -505A /r� Exhlblt "A -:" J II S c� � •� �` 7� "• � so ez t� e3 e4 �[€ , 'c xm r; t1 d 1� -„ 1 Y• — -LA PAIx_______ w � _}1,{ iii • 3 .LL '� 2j y a µ4.. k Y �S/114~ W — - — 'i.•KLr, G"R'L q I l 1 7e 01 i ; e0 41 q I 143 77 y! e2 ' I 3e 42 14Z : W i W r•r� .w�� ' i i =rvr t e3 i { ; $a : 4: 141 �+ la' 140 r 73 e4 1 ; 37 , 4• OMITA � t 10 Ivc,., a . ••. -rldf ; 7 7a A es • t $a 41 { Da 73 r 7 1 J 05 4. it 14 EmeoAcw -q F� i Amass �.`. m' s, j. t I' ACCESS l ! d7 ! n 9 ! 54 4. 71 Ga 53 v QROFESSI . i\ 70 x sz a 00 (!y(� 9 s� •''iyCw OI No. 23814 Exp 12131189 a k 1 r.+t rt CUM iorO - - l4AS' .O a C OF CA xi ! ROBEROS- r ACCESS Z /••� r `s• •STREET •: ^'ai'b ENWIFER3 S3 135 1 "C" ,reef „UP - V-08� .0 C.;tl' S1 >r,4 r r• sr H r. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: I li CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbiONGA STAFF REPORT 6rp Z June 15, 1908 pan I Mayor and Members of the City Council Brad Buller, City Planner Richard L Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 88- �•.. ur ..iu m w4MU - M amenument to Section an and the addition of Section 17.10.050 -0 of the Development Code pertaining to the parking and storage of vehicles on private pro arty in Residential, Commercial /Office and Industrial Districts RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of IM—s—ffe—veMpiint Code Amendment If the City Council concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of the attached Ordinance would be in order BACKGROUND: This Development Code Amendment is in response to rec on y the City Council to tighten the requirements for parking and storage of vehicles on private property. Specific problems which the existing code did not adequately address prompted this request. in addition, parking regulations required improvement for general enforcement purposes, to head off potential problems before they develop Staff expanded on the Council's initial direction to provide improvements. The issues of concern to the Council included: 1. The quantity of vehlclec permitted to be stored on private property; 2 The appropriate locations on property for vehicle parking and storage, and 3 The City's ability to provide tlmrly enforcement of private property parking violations. Other issues which are addressed within the Draft Ordinance include 1 Oversize and overweight vehicles, 2 Commercial and recreational vehicles and equipment; and ■ ' CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Development Code Amendment 88 -04 June 15, 1988 Page 2 3. Requirements for vehicles to be parked on paved areas. IIt ANALYSIS: The Planning Comaission reviewed and reccmmendad approve of this amerdwant on May 25, 1988, The at:achod Planning Cc mission s •ff report includes the reccmmended language for this i ar 4:ent and enforcement parameters. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a Pubiic Nearing in e a y sport newspaper. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Before approving the Development Code 7Cvanamen , a Dent must determine that the own nt will not be detrimental to properties or cause significant environmental Impacts. In addition, the proposal must be consistent with the intent of the General Plan and the Development Code. Res fly su ted. B d Bu r CI nn BB:RLA:nas Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Repart, May 25, 1988 Minutes of the May 25, 1938 Planning Commission Meeting Planning Commission Resolution No. 88 -108 City Cou -etl Ordinance ,55� — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , STAFF REPORT DATE: May 25, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard Alcorn, Code Enfor:ement Supervisor SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT u sec on ame men Subsection 17.10.050 -0 too the Development and adding a new to the parking and storage of Vehicle nprivateeproperty in Residential, Commercial /Office and Industrial Districts I. BACKGRWHO: City Council has directed staff to amend the ee opnen Code to tighten the requirements for parking on p:4. te property, specific recommendations were made to improve e ting regulations as they affect: 1. The quantity of vehicles permitttd to be stored on residen;fal property; 2. The appropriate locations on propert!• for vehicle parking and storage; and 3. The City's WWI to enforce private property parking violations. In addition, recent amendments to the Municipal Code modified certain sections regulating private property parking. These additional sections deal with regulation of: 1. Oversize and overweight vehicles; 2. Commercial and recreational vehicles and equipment; and 3 Parking on paved areas only. Existing Development Code pyrovisions treat Residential and Comaerciai /Industrial properties differently. To correct this inequity, additional requirements for vehicle parking and storage are "ecomended. Parking regulations for Commerciai /Industrial property have been provided dealing specifically with problems found at these locations. The range and intent of these PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Code Amendment 80 -04 May 25, 1988 Page 2 additional regulations is consistent with parking requirements for other zoning districts. EWORCENW: The enforcement of private property parking regulations is the responsibilitsy of Code Enforcement staff. The amended parking regulations are being designated as infractions to improse enforcement ability. As an infraction, violations are Punishable by a fine of up to $250.00, with no consideration of a jail term or entitlement to a jury trial. Though Code Enforcement endeavors to resolve violations cooperatively, there are times when it becomes necessary to issue a Citation. By giving certain violations an Infraction desi nation, it simplifies and accelerates court proceedings. Major violations, such as storing an excessive nutler of vehicles, would viGlate land use provisions as well as these parking requirements. In these instances, the land use violation would be a misdemeanor, allowing a court decision to include highar fines, probation, and cost assessments. RECOMPENDED MODIFICATIONS: The following language is suggested to more clearly define parking requires::nts on private property. Swbsection 17.08.070 -C (As Amended): C. Vehicle Pare_ing The parking of vehicles in all residential his r U shall be subject to the following provisions 1. The design guidelines and regulations for parking areas shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 17.12 of the Development Code; 2. Vehicle parking shall be within an enclosed garage, carport or other required o: authorized off -street paved parking area; 3. All parking areas within public view from the street, public right -of -way or adjacent properties shall be paved with a permanent paving material. Such area shall be maintained in a useable condition free of potholes and broken sections sufficient to prevent mud and /or dust, without accumulation of loose material or other deterioration; 4. Vehicles may be parked or stored in the side or rear yard provided that such area is screened from view froo the street, public right -,)f-way and adjacent properties by a fence, wall, or rquivalent screening material at least five (5) feet in height; PUMMING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Code Amendment 88 -04 May 25, 1988 Page 3 S. Vehicle parking within side and rear yard areas shall bo limited to five percent (5f) of the total lot area or five hundred (500) square feet, whichever is greater, unless constructed pursuant to an approved Minor Development Review; 6. Except as provided in Subsection 9 herein, vehicles Parked within public view in required or authorized parking areas within the front yard, corner side yard or side yard abutting a street shall be parked or left standing for temporary periods of time not to exceed five (5) consecutive days; 7. 'vehicles as used to this section, shall include, but not be limited to, commercial vehicles, automobiles, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi - trailers, motorcycles, mopeds, campers, campershclls, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial equipment; and, 8. No commercial vehicle which exceeds a gross weight of one and one -half (1 and 1/2) tons, or exceeds a width of or exceeds to hlengthexoof twenty-five f(25) seven feet; feet no specialized work related vehicle (e.g. towtruck, stakebed trucks, etc.) and no specialized work related portable equipment (e.g. cement mixers, trailers, etc.); shall be parked on any portion of a residential lot unless: (1) deliveries, (2)y in connectionnwith making ipick-ups aid to, the performance of a service to or on, the property where the vehicle is parked, while actively involved in such activity; ar (3) in conformance with the conditions of approval for a valid Home Occupation Permit as provided in Section 17.04.060 of the Development Code; 9. No private, non - commercial veh(cle which exceeds a gross weight of one and one -h*.lf (1 and 112) tons, or exceeds a width of eighty '?o) inches, or exceeds a height of seven (7) feet r; exceeds a length o%' twenty -five (25) feet; And no trailer, semi - trailer, boat or portable Itcreatianai equipment shall be parked or stored within 1h, front yard, corner side yard or side yard abutting a street unless: (1) it is not a commercial vehicle and is parked for a temporary period of time not to exceed twenty -four (24) hours; (2) it is involved in loading or unloading activity; and (3) It is parked in compliance with any other applicable City ordinance; WiWei PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT t May 2Opment Code Amendment 88 -04 Page 4 10. Violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as an infraction. Subsection 17.12.030 -3(sl (As Amended): 8. Any secondary paved driveway or extension of the primary drivewa) shall not be used for parking unless: P1) it connects the primary driveway access tc a second access point with the street or public right -of -way (1.4. circular driveway) with a continuous pavement width not exceeding twelve (12) feet; (2) it is an extension of the primary driveway toward the nearest side or rear yard area; or (3) is constructed pursuant to an approved Minor Development Review. Subsection 17.10.OS0 -0 (New Section): 0. Vehicle Parkin . The parking of vehicles in all commerciel/of rice and industrial districts shall be subject to the following provisions: 1. The design guidelines and regulations for parking facilities shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 17.12 of the Oevelopaent Code and any applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan; 2. vehicle parking shall be within buildings, garages or other required or authorized off -street paved parking facilities. 3. All parking facilities within public view from the street, public right -of -way or adjacent pruperty shall be ppaved with a permanent paving material. Such area shall be maintained in a useable condition free of potholes add - broken sections sufficient to prevent mud and /or dust, without accumulation of loose material or other deterioration,; 4 No vehicle shall be parked for the purpose of displaying such vehicle for sale or other commercial activity, including, but not limited to, lease, hire, advertising, etc unless such vehicle 1s parked by, or with the written permission of, a business on the property w.lich is permitted, licensed and approved to display vehicles for •uch purposes; PLANNING COIMISSION STMT REPORT Development Code Amendment 88 -04 May 25, 1988 Page 5 5. No vehicle shall be parked for the purpose of repair or maintenance unless: (1) such work is performed on vehicles owned or operated by the on -site business within an enclosed building or vard area screened from view from the street, public right -cf -way, adjacent properties and required off -street parking facilities with public access; or (2) in connection with A current on -site business permitted to ptrform repair or maintenance of vehicles and only during established business hours; 6. he vehicle which is disabled, unlicensed, unregistered, inoperative or from which an essential or legally required operating part is removed or missing shall be parked within public view from the street, public right - of -way, adjacent properties or required off -street parking facilities with public access, 7. No comsercial vehicle exceeding a , grossys weight of one and One-half a /traiier,orrsemi- trailer shall be parked within a commercial /office district unless: (1) it is screened from public view from the street, public right - df -way and 404acent properties; 12) it is actively involved in making pick -ups and deiiveries; or (3) in connection wit.`., and in aid w, the performance of a service to, or cn, the property where the vehicle is parked, while actively involved in such activity; 8. "Vehicles' as used in this section shall include, but not be limited td, commercial vehicles, automobiles, bucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi - trailers, motorcycles, mopeds, campers, camper steils, boats or other large portable recreational or commercial equipment; ?. violation of aly provision of this subsection shall be Punishable as an infraction. It ENVIRONl1ENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has coenleted Part II of the nv r0nman a ec s and concluded that the proposed azendment wo.,u not create significant adverse environmontal impacts. Therefore, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. III CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing %n e a y eport newspaper To date, no correspondence has been receded -- PLANNIMA CO MISSION STAFF'LEPOA Development Code Amendment 88 -0 %iay 25, 1 988 Page 6 IY. RECOIMENUATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission aaop a had Resolution recommending approval to the City Council of the proposed amendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration. t Resp ly s ted, ra Ou r S City ner BD:RLA:ns Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Development Code Sections 17.083W -C and 17.12.030 -8.8 Exhibit •D' - Envirowntal Checklist, Initial Study. Part II Resolution of Approval 17.08.070 4 There uhall be no minimum size for individual mobile home units. streets shall ybeminim= in iconformanco Yard wit). Table setback 17nO8uC•io0, Stroetecape setbacks 6. Existing bile home parksshal mobile l lnotbe home deemed rnonconformingabynreason of failure to meet the minimum ravirements prescribed in this section; provided, that the regulations of this subsec- tion shall apply to the enlargement or expansion of a mobile home park (Ord, 211 5 6 (part), 198gj• 17.08.070 General revisions• .4 Signs In all re- sident a le 14 of a gns s a be subject to the provi- sions . Title 14 of •;: a code. B. Property MaintenanL. All bu1'4',ya, structures, yards and other improvements shalt as maintained in a manner neighborhood detract the . The following conditions of the tures, 1 Dilapidated, deteriorating, or unrepaired struc- such as: fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; 2. Scrap lumber, junk, trash or debris; 7 Abandoned, discarded or unused objects or equip- ment, such as automobiles, automobile parts, furniture, stoves, refrigerators, cans, containers, or similar items; or epee; Stagnant water or ercavations, including pools S. Any device, decoration, design, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of i dition, or its inappropriate location. re height, con- zplA C. Vehicle Parking The parking of vehi.:les to all residential districts shall be subject to the provisions in Chapter 17 12 and the municipal code. D Vehicle and Equipment Repair and Storage. The fol- lcwing provisions shell apply to any vehicle, motor vehicle, camper, camper trailer, trailer, unr+ounted camper, trailer - coach, motorcycle, boat or similar conveyance in all resi- dential districts, and to all sites in any other district used for residential occupancy: wreekin I. Servicing, repairing, assemblinq, disassembling, g, modifying, restoring, or otherwise working on any of the above conveyances shall be prohibited unless can - ductcd within a garage or accessory building, or in an area screened from view from the street and adloininq lots by a legally located fence, wall, o: equivalent screening. 2 Stcrirg, placing or parking any of the above conveyances, or any part thereof, which is disabled, un- lrcenaed, unregistered, inoperative, or frcm. +hich an cssen- tlal or legally required operating part is removed, shall be Prohibited unless conducted within a garage or accessory building, or in an area screened from view from the street /�> 2 -2 -71 (Rancho Cucamongo 7/84) EXHIBIT A ,(tcee "Mad WIN aNnc 17.12 030 12 striping. All parking stalls shall be clearly striped and permanently maintained with double or hairpin lines on the surface of the parking facility, with the two lines located an equal distance of nine inches on either side of the stall sidelines. In all parking facilities, all aisles, approach lanes, and maneuvering areas shall be clearly marked with directional arrows and lines to expedite traffic movement. 11 Maneuvering. Parking and maneuvering areas shall be arranged so that any vehicle entering a public right -uf -way on a major or secondary street can do so trav- eling in a forward direction. tY B. Residential. The following design standards shall apply to the residential districts and developmentsi- 1. Covered off - street parking spaces in a garage -b: carport shall be a Minimum of nine feet in width and nine- teen feet in depth of unobstructed area provided for parking purposes The required minimum measurements may not incluee the exterior walls or supports of the structure. 2 Driveways providing access to garages, carports and parking areas serving three or less dwelling units shall be a minimum of ten feet in width for one -way traftic, and twenty feet for two -way traffic. 3 Driveways providing access to garages, carports, and open parking spaces serving four or more dwelling units shall be a minimum of twelve feet in width for one -way traf- fic, and twenty -four feet for two -way traffic 272 -101 (Rancho Cucamonga 7/87) 17.12.030 4. Driveways serving multiple dwelling units with garages or carports on either or both sides shall be in- creased a minimum of five feet on one side ohly, thus pro- viding a twenty -nine foot wide accessway between garage or carport spaces for two -way traffic. S. No property owner shall sublease, subrent or otherwise make available to residents of other properties, the off - street parking "paces required by this section. 6 All required covered off - street parking spaces shall to located conveniently accessible to the dwelling unit served b!� such parking space. 7. Residential developments which provide private streets, shall be planned, designed and constructed to meet the minimum city engineering requirements for private streets. M-0- streets. All recreational vehicle parking and /or storage areas located within the front yard setback shall be paved with either asphaltic concrete, cement, gravel or crushed rock. C. Commercial, Institutional, Community Facilities. The following design standards shall apply to commercial, institutional, and community facility uses: 1. Thorn areas designated for use by motorcycles shall consist of a minimum usable area of fifty -six square feet 2. Parking bay widths shall b9 computed according to the specifications set forth in Table 17 12.030D. 3. Two -way access driveways with no parking shall be a sLLnimum of twenty -four feet. One -way access driveways with no parking shall be a minimum of twelve feet. D. Parking Facility Design. Following are c:i its and diagrams to which all parking facilities shall be designeds 1. Parking Bev Widths. Zaeh parking facility is designed with parking sy units. The size or width of this unit is dependent on ois or two -way traffic and single or douhie loaded aisles. Use the following chart to determine the overall width of the parking bay design which is being used. The dimensions listed are the amount necessary to contain parking stall depth and alsla width. Parallel park- ing may be permitted; however, they must not be counted as �• Part of the required driveway width and must maintain four feet between spaces. (Rancho Cucamonga 272 -101 7/07) C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: / Lu l % / q b78 APPLICAIT: C C A FILLY. DATE: NUMBER: -He -oy PROJECT; PROJECT LOCATION; ,C!,,V� I. Eb•VTRON?LNTAL I!lPACIS � (Explanation of all ^yea" and "maybe" anauers are required sheets). on attached YES MAYBE 1.0 1. Soils and Ceoloul, Will the proposal have ■lgniticant results in: a, Unstable ground Conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? ✓ b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c• Change in topography or ground surface -C contour intervals? d, The destruction, covering or modification of - any unique geologic or physical features? e Any Potential � rosn ioConditons7 leither yoneor Of so12s Affecting o[[ nice f Changes in erosion sil:acion, or deposition? R Exposure of people or property to geologic to hazards such as earthquakes, lidos, mud - alidea, ground [silure, or similar hazards? h An 1w.rease In the race of extraction and /or use Of any mineral resource? 2 Hydrrloav, Will the proposal have significant results in; _ / S y sue, Page 2 YES MAYBE NO a. Changes in currents, or the cuurse of direction of flowing stroars, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b Changes In absorption rates, drainage patterns, .1.. or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? V e. Alterations to :ha course or flow of flood -- waters? vlter 1 — d. Change In the amount of curfac, avatar In any body of water? a. Discharge Into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwatar charactarlstics? g. Change in the quantity of groundvacars. either through direct additions or with - dravals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Qusntity? h The reduction In the amount of water ocher - vise available for public water supplies? 1 Exposure of people or property to water / related hatards such as flooding or sefchas? 3. Air Quality. Will ti-e proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile / or indirect sources? ✓ _ Stationary sources? `. b Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions. Affecting air =vacant, moisture or temperature? 4 Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results lni a. Change In the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of an, Y ?age 1 YES MAYBE SD c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of Plants into an area? / d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? / Fa_ una. Will the proposal have significant results ✓ In. A- Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or numbers Of any Species of animals? ✓ b Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c Incroduc:Ion of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result In a barrier to the migration or movement oi, animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? — -- / S. Population. Will the proposal have significant 1/ results in: s. 4111 the proposal altar the location, distri- bution, dantity, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or creace a demand for addicional housing? _ 6 SOtio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have 1 signlficanc results ]n: a Change in local or regional socio-economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, end property values? ' — / ✓ b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project benafIcL3rlae, I.a., boyars, tax payers or prof act users? 7 land Lase and planning Cona ideraclons. Will the -- Droposal have si gntlicant results in? a A substantial alteration of the present or Planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, 1 or adopted plans of any governmental entities? � , C. An impacc upon the qulalty or quantity of axis ting *Onsumptive or non - consumptive recreational 0000rtun1t4..t page G YES :AY3E o 8. TransDrrtatlon. Will the proposal have significant result. Ia; a. Cencracion of ■ubstantial additional vehicular movement? b Effects on existing street-, or demand for __ -- y/ ncv street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or — demand for new parking? d. Substzntla' impact upon existing transports- tion syctemc7 a. Alterations to present patterns of circ•,la- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alteration* to or effects on przsenc and ..r. Potential warer- Sorne, rail, ease transit or air traffic? -- g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural 1 pe_ s— urcac. Will the proposal have L significant results In; a A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, Paleontological. and /or historical resources? 10. Health. Safe and fiuiasnea Faecora. W111 the proposal have algnitieant results a Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard] -- b Exposure of people to potential health hazards? C, A risk of explosion or release of hazardous subctances in the event cf an accident? d An increase In the number of individuals or apeclas of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? a. Increase in existing noise levels, _- _/✓ f Exposure of people to potentially dangerous _ �. ..e noise levels? / g The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? /( 6 _� Page 5 YES ".SYPE 40 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have algnlflcanc results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? / The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? —._ C, A conflict with the ob]ective of designated potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systass, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? -- b. Natural or packaged gas? -- c• Communications systems? d. Water supply? a Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? 1 —_ g Solid waste facilities? h Fire Protection? S. Police protection,? ] Schools? k Parks or other recreational facilities? 1• Maintenance of public sacilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? 13 Enerav and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have algnlf leant results in a. lse of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? _ / b Substantial increase In demand upon existing sources of energy? / c An increase 11 the demard for development of -- new sources of energy? Ifif d. An Increase or perpetuation of the consiaaprlun of non-renewable Eons of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? / V s. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable ur scarce natural resource? 14. Nandstary Findings of Significance. t b. C. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife poula drop clon to bales self sustaining levelsp, threau to eliminate a plant or animal community, °raduca the number at restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate Important .samples of the major periods of Callforn.Sa history or prsi,istory? Done the project have the potential to achieve short -:era, to the disadvantage of long -ca, environmenta n l goals? (A chart -ten impact on the ewlroament is one-which occurs In a relatively brief, definitive period of tlrne while long- term impacts will endure veil Into the future) Does the project have impacts which are Individually limited, but cumilstively considerable? (Cumulatively cunsiderable cues that the incramantal effects of an Individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past proj and probable future projects). acts. u Page 6 YES MAYBE \D — — z __z . L' d. Does the project have environmental effects Which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Indirectly? II DISCUSSION OF ENVIE0NME`7TAL VALUATION (S.e., of aFf1r=1cive answers to tbova questions plus a discussloo of proposed mitigation =assures). /70 III DETEMINATION Ou the basis of this initial evaluation: ® I find the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant affect on the envlromtnt, and a NEGATIVE DECLAUTION will be prepared. I find that althoufh the proposed project could have a significant effect on the eavironaent, there will not La a significant affect In this case because the citig:tlon nessutes described on an attached sheet have been adds.] to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL 9E PEEPAAED. F-1 I find the proposed project HAY have a signl£Scanc effect on the anvlrment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT EEpORT to requited. Da[e�7i17�'L� Signature �• vat f,Jlacc: PnfE.J� �dtriSa.0 Page 7 r. n N ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02C - CITY OF N M U ON - An amen mrtnt to the and U;e ement ar t e o ow ng parce s w th n Lhe Victoria Community Plan area: from Low- i:edium (4 -6 dwelling units per acre) to Low (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) APN: 227- 411 -75; from Medium (8 -)14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to 9(14.244drelling units riper acre) APN: 227- 091 -18 through 22, 25, 43; from Medium (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) APN: 227- 111 -1, 33. 38; and from Neighborhood Commercial to Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 227- 171 -19 Debra Meier, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chat man McN1el opened the public hearing There were no comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 88 -02C to the City Council Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIE4, TOLSTOY, SLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried 0. ENVIROUVENTAL ACSC[cMrwT acn ,.r,.�.........- ____ wnn[nU LCCAMON - n amen went to ect on _ -. _' ,p ao -uv - �;ir OF t e ad t on of Section 17.10.050 -0 of the Development Lode - Pie- 't�SiBngato the parking and storage of vehicles on private property in the Residential, Commercial and Industrial Districts. Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor, presented the staff report. Chairman HcNfel opened the public hearing. Doug Lyon, Rancho Lucaaior.ga resident, asked for a clarification of this amendment. Mr. Alcorn aCvised that the amendment addresses residential parking and limits the quantity of vehicles based on lot area and limits the length of time vehicle, can be stored on a lot. There were no further Comments, therefore the public hearing was close!. Planning Commission Minutes -12- May 25, 1988 r� Motion: Moved by Chttiea, seconded by Blakesl-y, the Resolution reccrosmending approval of Environmental Assessment and to adopt Development Code Amendment 88 -04 to the City Council Motion carried by the following vale: S AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried NEW BUSINESS P MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -OS - SEIFERT - An appeal of staff's decision to eny a mo tattoo o pater a s or the building elevations of an existing office building within the Office /Professional District located en the east side of Hellman, south of Base Line Road - APN: 208_431_ 28. (Continued from May 11, 1988) Cynthia Kinser, Assistant Planner, presented the staf` repot. Chairman McN1el invited public comment. Nona Seifert, 7333 Hellman, urged the Commission's approval of the awning and change in tile. She presented slides which depicted awnings used on various buildings throughout the City. Larry Seifert, 7333 Hellman, supported the modifications. He felt the four buildings reflect individual themes and that the change in tile color would not take away from their compatibility. There were no further comments. Commissioner Tolstoy gave the history behind the development of this corner of the City. He felt that the change In tile color would break the continuity of the buildings and supported the original tile ccler or a similar color in shades of red or rust, with awning of the same color. Chairman McNiel agreed that the tile should remain as it currently exists on the building. He considered awnings appropriate, witn the exception that the sample color provided was a rather told blu^ next tc residential. COJn1sSioner Chltiea agreed that the proposad decorative the would be compatible with the surrounding structures ai.d also picked up the color of the tile roof She stated tnat awnings are appropriate to this style of hone. however, was concerned with awnings in the City due to the wind factor and resultant maintenance problems. Planning Commission Minutes -13- May 25, 1988 /7-3 RESOLUTION NO 88 -108 A RESOLUTION nF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 88-04, AHENOINE SUBSECTION 17.08.070 -C AND 17.12.030 -9. AND ADDING A NEY SUBSECTION 17.10.050 -0 TO TdE DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO THE PARKING AND STORAGE OF VEHICLES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL, COKNERCIAL /OFFICE AND IHDuSTRIk. DISTRICTS WHEREAS, on the 25th day of Nay. 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS. the P1anai,.g Commmission finds it necessary to amend and revise the Oevclopment Code regulations pertaining to the faking and storage of vehicles on private property within the residentiai, commercial and industrial districts; SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commision finds that the proposed evt>— eT nt Cede Amendment 88 -04 is an implementation of the General Plan goals and policies and that the General Plan Environmental Impact report adequately coven any potential significant adverse impacts. Further, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplewental environrntal impact report is required pursuant to Division 13,. Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code. Specifically, the Plarning Commission finds: A. No substantial changes are proposed in any goals or oolicles which would require major revisions to the EIR. No substantial changes have occurred with , -spect to the circumstances under which the project is being .indertaken. No new information on the project has become available. SECTION 2: The Ranche Cucamonga Planting Commission has found-that tkis pro e w not create a significant adverse impsct on the environmont and recoiands issuance of a negative Declaration on Nay 25, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Plarning Coemission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 88-04 amending Subsection 17.08.070 -C, 17.12.J30 -8, and the addition of Subsectioi 17.10.0!0- 0 as follows: /-)y PLANNING COh]1ISSION RESOLUTION No. Development Code Amendment o8 -04 Page 2 Subsection 17.08.0704 (As Amended): C. Vehicle Parkinq. The parking of vehicles in all rem si s s riots shall be subject to the following provisions. I. (he design guidelines and regulations for parking areas shall Conform to the provisions of Chapter 17.12 of the Development Code; 2. Vehicle parking shall be within the enclosed garage, carport or other required or authorized off -street paved parking area; 3. All parking areas within public view from the street, public right -of -way or adjacent properties shall be paved with a permanent paving material. Such area shall be maintained in a useable condition free of potholes and broken Cections sufficient to prevent mud and /or dust, without accumulation of loose material or other deterioration; 4. Vehicles my be parked or stored in the side or rear yard provided that such area is screened from view from the street, public right -of -way and adjacent properties by a fence, wall, or equivalent screening material at lea_t fiva (5) feet in YR,ght; S. Vehicle oarking within side and rear yard areas shall be limited to five percent (51) of the total lot area or five hundred (500) square feet, whichever is greater, unless Constructed pursuant to an approved Minor Development Review; 6. Except as provided in Subsection 9 herein, vehicles -w parked within public view in required ur authorized parking areas wl:,tn the Front yard, Corner side yard or sloe yard abutting a street shall be parked or left standtny for temporary periods of time not to exceed five (51 Consecutive days; 7. 'Vehicles' as used in this section shall include, but not be limited to, commercial vehicles, automobiles, trucks tr ilers tor rucks motorcyclIs,amopeds, campers,tamoershelis, broatsror other large portable recreational and commercial equipment; and, PLANNING ComISSION RESOLUTION No. Development Code AmerAment 88 -04 Page 3 8. No comm6rcial veh one and one -half of eighty (80) irs feet or exceeds a sPecialized work Portable equipment lot untessll b(lparl In aid the aid erfoi property where the s involved in such ac with the conditions Occupation Permit as the Development Code; e which exceeds a gross woight of s or exceeds a height of seveni(7) n9th of twenty -five (25) feet, no elated vehicle (e.g. towt.ack, ,) and ae sPecialfzed work related (0•9• cement mixers, trailers, .d on any portion of a resid -intial t is actively involved in making as; (2) in connection with, and once of a service to, or on, the ehicie is parkod, while actively :ivity; or (3) in conformance Of approval for a valid Home provided. in Section 17.04,060 of 9. No private, non•,commercial vehicle which exceeds a gross weight of one and one -half (1 An4 1/2) tons or exceeds a width of eighty (80) inches, or exceeds a height of seven (7) feet or exceeds a length of twenty -five (25) feet; and no trailer, semi- trailer, boat or portable racnaticnal equipoent shall be parked or stored within the front yard, corner side Yard or side yard abutting a street unless: (1) it is not A commercial vehicle and is parked for a to orary period of time not to exceed twenty -four (24) hours; (2) it is Involved in loading or unloading activity; ano (3) it is parked in compliance with any other applicable City ordinance; 10, yfol +Lion of any pro -ision of this subsection shall be Punis.able as an infraction. Subsection 17.12.030 -e(S) (AS AmeAdad): 8• Any secondary paved driveway or extension of the unless: not be used for ` primary driveway shall parking unless: (1) it connects the primary driveway access to a second access Point 111th the street or right -af -way public (i -e. circular driveway) witty. eor.Llnuous pavement width not exceeding twelve (12) ftowerd the nearestaslde or s rear yardearea; or d(3)ew1- constructed pursuant to An approved Minor Development Review. PLANNING C0*lSSION 0, M RESOLUTION Development Code "M4d OLU ION N Page 4 Subsectfoa 17.10.0SD -0 (am Section): 0, vehicle Parkin Thi parking of vehicles In all cawjrc a o ca and industrial districts shall be subject to the foflLwing provfsfos: 1, acilitiesn shall c nformato the gprovisions of Chapter 17,12 of the Development Code and any applicable provisions of the Induscrfal Specific Plan; 2. Vehicle parking shall be within buildings, garages or other required or authorized off - street paved parking facilities. 3. All parking facilities within DDublic view from the street, public right -of -way or adjacent property shall shall vbe maintained alma puseablea ondition free rof potholes and broken sections sufficient to prevent mud and /or dust without accumulation of loose material or other deterioration; 4. No vehicle shall be parked for the purpose of displaying such vehicle for sale or other cOmsercia) activity, including, but not limited to, lease, hire, advertising, etc, unless such vehicle is parked by, or rith the written permission of, A business on the property which is permitted, licensed and approved to display vehicles for such purposss; S. or vehicle Shall be Parked ) for such irorkliose of repair vehicles owned or operated by the On-site nuMsieness within an enclosed buildinj or yard area scresned from.,, " view from the street, public right- of -w{;, adjacent pproperties and required off -street parking facilities bus Ltihhnessbpermittedsto o, (2) in connection with a vehicles and only during restablished business hours; 6. No vehicle which is disabled, unlicensed, unregistered, inoperative or from which an essential or legally required operating part is removed or missing shall be parked within blic vfaw from the Sttrezt, public right -of -way, agpacent properties or accessed Off - street parking facilities with public l77 j PLANNING COISSIOU, NESOLUTION N0. s D IM evelspment Code Amendment 88 -04 W ?' 7. No commercial vehicle exceeding a gross wnlght of one Al and one -half (1 and I12) tons, or exceedingi a width of eighty (8o) inches, or a trailer or semi - trailer shall be Perked within a c0emerciai /office district unless: (1) it is screened from public via w from the a street, public right -of -way and adjk•ee4t (2) it is actively involved yin making p poperties; rick-ups and ' deliveries; or (3) jr. connection with, sod in aid to, the performance of a service to, or on, the involved io such a�ctlritC. is parked, while actively 'k 8. 'Vehicles' as used in this section shall include, but not be limited to, commercial vehicles, automobiles, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, seat- trailers, Motorcycles, mopeds, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational or ccwerclal w_ equipment; D. Violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as an��yyinfraction. 2- That a hereby adopted by thCertified lanning Remiss oe sha111ib�oPorrardedatod the uC1ty Courr -il. 3. The Planning Comission hereby momaend$ that epprove and adopt City Council pt Oevel2Pcnt Code Amendment 80 04 as stated heroin. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 257H DAY OF NAY, lgg8. PLANNING COlMISSION OF THE CITY nF oawrun mw...,..,..A /79 i'r Hi:' v ii %:;t.. ��.y s'a '..�.. �� r5- ti:':•.' - y.:.'% .,.. . .i a w�.r;1"�� <r epij Y Y PLANNING COIMISSION11ESOWTION N0. Oeveloprnt Cade AmmAment 88 -01 Page 6 b. [ I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of . Rancho Cucamnga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution yas duly and K ' re gularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the N City of Rancho Cucaaainga, at a regular.metIng cf the Planning Commission hold on the 25th day of May, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CINMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, BIAKESLEY, EMERIC4, WMIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COWISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE /79 ORDINANCE N0. 3 (e b AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 8. AID3 ADD IMINEW SUMUTI0N 1177.080.070500-C 0 To THE12 CRAKNO UCA VISA HURICIPA. CODE PERTAINING TO VEHICLE PARKING a WIIAIN RESIDENTIAL. CO1K9CIAL /OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL DI- rWCTS. A. Recitals. (1) On 1''\0.�..i 19e8, the Planning Commission of the S City Rancho Cucamonga c c a my noticed public hearing rith respect to the Potlowln proposed amendment to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga 4. ?hereinafter larking ewthin residential. commercial and Industrial districts of the City. t (11) At the conclusion of said ni 1988, ubitc E hearing, the Planning Commission adopted its es a ion o. be- � thereby recommending that this Council adopt the proposed Develop sent Cc a ameMments as set forth In this Ordinance. (111) On 1988, the C1b Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga con c a v y no iced public hearing with respect to the proposed Development Code amendments as set forth herein and said hearing was cnncluded prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. (iv) All legal prerequisited prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this rD�ance are true and correct. Ranchg�ga Is Subsection 17.08.070-C to read,tin words aandnfigures,fashfollows: C. Yehicle Parking The parking of vehicles in all residential s r e s s a a subject to the following provisions. 1. The design guidelines and regulations for parking areas shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 17.12 of the Development Code; 2 Yehicle parking shall be within the enclosed garage, carport or other required or authorized off -street paved parking area, Ordinance Mo. Page 3. All parking areas within public view from the street, public right-of-way or adjacent properties shall be paved permanent maintaidiauieable co condition free Ofr shall potholes and broken sections sufficient to prevent mud and /or dust, without accumulation of loose material or other deterioration; 4. Vehicles may be parked or stored in the side or rear yard provided that such area 1s screened from view from the street, public right -of -way and adjacent properties by a fence wall, or equivalent screening material at least five 15) feet in height; S. Vehicle parking within side and rear yard areas shall be limited to five percent (5f) of the total lot area or five hundred (500) square feet, whichever is greater, unless constructed pursuant to an approved Minor Development Review; 6. Except as provided ;n Subsection 9 herein, vehicles parked within public view in required or authorized parking areas within the front yard, corner side yard or side yard abutting a street shall be parked or left standing for texporary periods of time not to exceed five (5) consecutive days; 7. *Vehicles` as used in this section shall include, but not be limited to, comercial vehicles, automobiles, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi - trailers, motorcycles, mopeds campers, cav ershells, boats or other large portabI recreations I and commercial equipment; and, 8. 90 commercial vehicle which exceeds a gross woight of one and one -half (1 amd 1/2) tons, or exceeds a width of eighty (80) inches or exceeds a he' ht of seven (7) feet or exceeds a length of twenty five (25) feet; no specialized work related vehlcie (e 9. towtruck, stakebed trucks, etc ) and no specialized work related portable aOfpment (e.g. cement mixers, trailers, etc.); shall be parked on any portion of a resideitial lot unless: (1) it is actively involved in making plck -ups and deliveries; (2) in connection wi h, and in aid to, the performance of a service to, or on, the property where the vehicle is parked, while actively involved In such activity; or (3) 1n conformance with the conditions of approval for a valid %" Occupation Psrrit as provided in Section 17.04.060 of the Development Code; Ordinance No. Page 3 9 No private, non-commercial vehicle which exceeds a gross weight of one and one -half (1 and 1/2) tons, or exceeds a width of eight/ (80) inches, or exceeds a height of seven (7) feet or exceeds a length of twenty -five (25) feet; and no trailer, seat- trailer, boat or portable recreational equipment shall be parked or stored within th^ front yard, corner side yard or side yard abutting a street unless: (1) it is not a ;ommercial vehicle and Is parked for a temporary period of tine not to eAceed twenty-four (24) hours; (2) it is involved In lading or unloading activity; and (3) it is parked in compliance with any other applicable City ordinance; 10. violation of any provislcn of this subsection shall be punishable as an infraction. SECTION 3: Subsection 17.12.030 -8(8) of the Oevelopment Code of the City of RaTLucamonga 1s hereby amended to read, to words and figures, ao follows: 8. Arty secondary paved driveway or extension of the primary driveway shall not be used for parking unless: (1) It connects the primary driveway access to a second access Point with the street or public right -of -way (i.e. circular driveway) with a continuous pavement width not exceeding tweive (12) feet; (2) it is an extension of the primary driveway toward the nearest side or rear yard area; or (3) 1s constructed pursuant to an approved Minor Development Review. SEC710M 4: Subsection 17.10.050 -0 is hereby added to the Development Code oi- iF-Ciiy of Rancho Cucamonga to be read, in words and figures, as follows: 0, vehicle Parking. The parking of vehicles in all comaerc a o r ce and industrial districts shall be subject to the following provisions: 1 The design guidelines and regulations for parking facilities shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 17.12 of the Development Code and any applicable provisions of the industrial Specific Plan; 2. Vehicle parking shall be within buildings, garages or other required or authorized off -street paved parking facilities. All parking facilities within public view from the street, public right -of -ray or adjacent property shall be paved with a permanent paving naterlal. Such are& shall ordinance No. Page 4 be maintained in a useable condition free of potholes and broken sections sufficient to prevent mud and /or dust, without accumulation of loose material or other deterioration; 4. No vehicle shall be p:-ked for the purpose of displaying such vehicle for sale er other commercial activity including, but not limited to, lease, hire, advert ising, etc. unless such vehicle is parked by, or with the written parmission of, a business on the property which is permitted, licensed and approved to display vehicles for such purposes; 5. No vehicle shall to parked for the purpose of repair or maintenance unless: (1) such work is performed on vehicles owned or operated by the on -site business within an enclosed building or yard area screened from view from the streft, public right -of -way, adjacent pyroperties and required off -street parking facilities Ath public access; or (2) in connection with a current on -site business permitted to perform repair or maintenance of vehicles and only during established business hours. 6. No vehicle which is disabled, unlicensed, unregistered, inoperative or from which an essential or legally required operating9 part is remov*d or missing shall be parsed within public view from the street, public right - of -way, adjacent properties or required off -street parking facilities with public access; 1. No commaercial vehicle exceeding a gross k -fight of one and one -half (1 and 1/2) tons, or zxceeding a width of eight' (80) inches, or a trailer or semi - trailer shall be parked withih a commercial /office district unless: (1) it is screened from public view from :he street, public right - of -way and adjacent properties; (2) it is e,tfvely involved in making pick -ups and deliveries; ,,, i,ll' in connection with, and in aid to, the performance of a sc-rice co, or on, the prcperty where the vehicle is parked, white actively involved in such activity; 8 'vehicles' as used in this section shall include, but not be limited to, commercial vehicles, automobiles, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi- traflers, motorcycles, mopeds, campers, camper shells, bats or other large portable recreatfonal or commercfal equipment; 9- Violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as an infraction. r; Ordinance fro. ' Page 5 CT10B 5: e City Council declares that, should any provision, secti � fi on, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared tnvalfd by any, final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptf -.e legislation, the reawtlntng provisions, sxttons, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. re�heeolk rhiftes 5) Of shrdnca and sr4TTise the samtbePublishedwitin fifteen (15) dayafteits passage at least onto in The Oafl Re ors, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n ar o, a o -nta, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucawnga, California. i� I CITY OF RANC50 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 19P8 TO'. Mayor and Members of the City Council FRM Hobart A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager 8Y• Jerry S. Futwood, Resource Center Coordinator ENGINEERSRE :•: :o. • .. .�: t. u.t a� • :. • „':• „ . j• it is recommended that City Council hold the public hearing, and if appropriate, apprrve the attached Resolution establishing the assessments for 1988 -89 for the Park and Recreation Improvement District 85PD (Heritage and Red Rill Community Parks) Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must approve an Annual Engineer's Report which reviews the status of the district and projected expenditures and revenues to establish the rate of assessment for the next fiscal year The following Is a summary of 1988x87. 1987/88 and 1988/89 assessments for the Parks and Recreation Improvement district 85PD. Single Family Residential $33.50 $33.50 $33.50 Residential with more than one dwelling unit were and will be assessed for an amount equal to $33.50 times the number of dwelling units. r r i; at.. n �r CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK/RFCREATION 85PD June 15, 1988 Page 2 Parcels less than 1.5 acres 1.5 acres to 3.5 acres 3.51 acres to 7.0 acres 7.01 acres to 14.0 acros 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres 25.01 acres and larger Respectfully submitted, /,A,? -A, ,Q,' Robert A. Rizzo Assistant City Manager RAR:JBF:sgr Attachments Resolution Engineer's Report 1988/R7 1987/88 1988189 $16.75 $16.75 $16.75 50.25 50.25 50.25 117.25 117.25 117.25 234.50 234.50 234.50 469.00 469.00 469.00 837.00 837.00 037.00 la RESOLUTION NC. A RESOLUTIOM OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 85PD (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 4th dad of May, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88.280 to order the therein described work in connection with the Park and Recreation Improvement District which RawAutlon of Intention No. 88.280 was duly and legally published In the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work, and the bonefita to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work 2r'- .T1� It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District for the fiscal year 1988.89, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described !n said Resolution of Intention No. 88.280, be done and made; and SECTION 2, Be It further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTI,QN 3, Be it finally resolved that the assessments for fiscal year 1988.89 and msthod of assessment In the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. 1 �7 ;5 "J f K- J TABLE OF CONTENTS } 4 PAGE yf f SECTION AUTHORITY FOR REPORT I SECTION 2 F ;,tDINGS 2 SECTION 3 DISTRICT ANALYSIS 3 SECTION d ESTIMATE OF COST 4 ' SECTIONS METMODOFSPREAD 5 EXHIBIT A ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM MAPS .l' r � At. II SECTION 1 • AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 1986-1969 Fiscal Year update Is prepavd pursusni to the cider of the 31ty Council of the 'Cry of Rancho Cucamonga and In compliance with the roquirememi of Article 4, Ch3ptor 1, Landscaping and Ughting Act of 1972, being Dtvlslon 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highway Code. Provisions for Ws annual assessment are included In Chap!ar 3 of vt` the Landscaping and Ughdrrj Act of 1972. , C,tr" t• The purpose of this report Is to set forth findings and the 'assascmont an& sis for the annual y levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. 85-PO, Itrsrealter referred to as 'Iho OlstrlcP. •TW District, utilizing ouod benefit assessments, has boon created to prov!de funds "to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, and operation of Heritage Community PMc and Rod Hill Community Park in the City of Rardw Cucamonga, 1 I 0 r. .> SECTION 2 - FINDINGS t Section 22579, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied �. occordino to benefit rather thon according to asaossed value. The aecllnn states: The not amount to be assessed upon tan4w4thin an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the not amount among all assessable lots or parcels In proportion to the estimated bennOts to be received by each such lot or parcel from the Improvements' The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the Improvements Is contained In the Improvement Act of 1911 (Diwalon 7, commencing with Soclk., 6000 of the Streets and Highways Code, Seto of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district Into benefit areas where, by reason of variations In the nature , location, old extant of the Improvements, me various areas will receive during differing degrees of benefit from the Improvements. Benefiting areas consist of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of bonolit from the improvements acid may consist of contiguous or nonconliguous voss. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit. they are considered a user's too, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainlino right -of -way, public utillt/ transmission fighhof -way, common areas, and nonpmtit organizations (Le., churches, clubs) are also exempt hom assessment. The assessment to, moblle fame parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. _11 i SECTION 9 - DISTRICT ANALYSIS g„ A Improvement District Boundary i The Improvement cotrlct Includes oil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general oxceptbn of the Edwanda area In the northeasterly section of the City. The Egwanda area Is not Included In the, Improvement district because community park dosign and construction In that area Is, in general, being financed by devebpmonl loos pursuant to t, the Quimby Act. The assessment district boundary Is shown on the assessment diagram map (Exhibit A). ' a All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described In mops prepared r In accordance with Section 927 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on fife In the office of the San Bernardino County A3sessor in the Hag of R000rds, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, Canfmcla and which are hereby made a pan heroof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park Improvement District No. 8S-PD G Facilities The existing works of Improvement are generally doscrlbod as follows: 1 The construction of Heritage Community Park Including, but not 4mhed to, grading, plantkrg. Inlgstlon, on-site roads, sidewalks, parking lots, Ilghti; g, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic fadfitles, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equeshfan trails. 2 The construction of Red HIII Community Park Including , but not limited to, grading, planting, Irrigation, on roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, reotroonis, senior citizens facilities, playground equlpinan6 picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogoing trail, underground storm drain system, and adjacent public street Improvements. 3 c r_ ¢ y Y rti `ai 4 >• SECTION 4 - ESTIVATE OF COST The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits In subsequent fiscal year Costs for tha district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessments or any deficits shall be Included In the assessment for the following + fiscal year ' 1988-1989 FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATED COSTS AND BUDGET SUMMARY Deficit from 1987.1988 Budget ($7,794) J Contributions (Interest earned) r• RmBo d to nd Debt Service) e 29,490 _ Special Reserve Fund (Limited to Pay Bond Debt Service) _Z e73 29,269 c Total Estimated Ave'4eblo Funds County Special Charges 5,665 Administration Charges 90,632 Consultants' Fees -0- , Fiscal Agent Charges .0. T Debt Service Instalimon: (1/2/89) 311,365 Debt Service Installment (7/2/89) 496,363 Operation and Malnlonanco X2.244 960,269 Balance to Assessment 937,000 4 4 , /9� SECTION 5 - METFIOD OF SPREAD The landscap1n0 and Ughting Act of 1972 Mdicalos that assessments may be epporticned by any formula or Modred which fairly disb;butes costs among all Iota or parcels vrithlr the District In proportion M the estimated benellis recaNed. A Definitions F, The District Is divided Into three categories for the Purpose of determining the q99. assessments as follows: Category A - Includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. Category B - Includos a0 parCOI3 not defined In Category A or Category C. Category C - Includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels wore discovered by searching No County Assessor's computer topes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less that $500. In corld doing this search, snvoiar parcels were Included as exempt that show parcel slzcs in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back Into the rolls and assessed B. FermL The assessment formula Is based on actual land use Information conlalcod In the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer 61os and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions: Assessors Number of Existing Res. _ $Ita.9aamt Pamd Shn RSrme Dwolllna_ Ilnits /pares 0-4 Less than 1.5 acres and 1 or more dwelling units 5 151 to 3.5 acres and 2 or more dwelling units 6 3.51 to 7.0 acres and 4 or more dwelling units 7 7.01 to 14.0 acres and 6 or more dwelling units 6 14.01 to 25.0 acres and 15 or more dwolllna units 9 25.01 acres d larger" 26 or more dwelling units 5 _ /93 G .C_ummnry of Prollminery Asse«mnn� 1 Am_o= Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment which will be levied annually Is $33.50 p� residential dwelling unit for those parcels In category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residontial dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal ;o $33.50 times the number of dwellinn units. J I; Category A is besed in the number of existing rosldantial units. The actual assessment far Bond `t.;. Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decroase each year as more residential units are !wilt within the improvement district. Malntenanco costs, however, are expected to Increase annually and will somewhat offset tho anticipated decrease In assessments due to new • } ; development. Category 13: Ali parcels not do0,nsd in Category A or Calegury C. f, Category C: Ali exempt parcels as defined below: .' 1 all properties currently tax exempt; d 2 all public ownorehips; 3 railroad mainline rights -of -way; 4 major utility transmission rights -of -way; z i 5 mineral rights, 0 parcels so small they currently cannot be bul't upon: • 7 all normally assessable parcels with an assessed valuation of toss mat $500 and t.S =as or loss, and a nonprn "t organL•gtlons (I.e., churches). G .C_ummnry of Prollminery Asse«mnn� 1 Am_o= Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment which will be levied annually Is $33.50 p� residential dwelling unit for those parcels In category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residontial dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal ;o $33.50 times the number of dwellinn units. J yr r Category B: The assessment which may be levied for parcels within Category B shat be according to the following schedule: 5e' s1 Assessor's N ` +S�8.BP16iLL t' = a110wgB Ane MMI pal isc 0- 4 lass than 1.5 acres a 5 1.5 acres to 35 acres $ 50.25 8 3.51 aria to 7.0 acres $11725 7 7.01 aaca to 14.0 was $23450 e 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres $469.00 `r 9 25.01 arras and larger $837.50 N Category C: Tho assessment shas be $0.0 for Category C parcels. Some assessments may vary tram the values given above by $.01 or $.02 either way. < The computer spreads the actual Balance to Assessment, carries the extra pennbs left over from an even cpread, and adds them one at a time to the assessment rot from the first parcel downward to make the total assessment spread exactly equal the Balance to Assessment The Individual 1988.1989 assessments by Assessor's parnol number (Exhibit 0) have boon tabulated and are on file al City Hall with the City Clerk of IN City of Rancho Cucamonga and are hereby made a part heroof by this reference. Dated _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA 7 City Engineer k CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 8y: Debra Mater, AssrLiate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL AND GENERAL I "Muni ry rian area: per acre) to Low (2 -4 411 -75; from Medium 8 Medium (4 -8 dwelling i 4Je, 50; from Medium 18 throwyh 22, 25 per acre) to Low. APN: 227- 111 -1, 3 to Medium Resident APN: 227 - 171 -19 M-9 parcels nowithi n the Victoria am Low- Medium (4 -8 duelling units Wing units per acre) APN: 227- dwelling units per acre) to Low- s per acre) APN: 227- 091 -9, 26, 14 dwelling units per acre) to ng units per acre) APN: 227-091 - 'rom Medium (8 -14 dwelling units (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and from Neighborhood Coaiercial -1.1 duelling units per a:re) - RELATED FILE: VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 88 -02 I. RECOHVENOATION: The Planning Commission and Staff recoamend that the City council approve General Plan amendment 88 -02C. II ABSTRACT. The General Purpose of Plan Designationr with the the recommended Victoria diLand Use Designation for each of the areas in Question. Of the eleven areas General Plan sand Use Revisions to ire lect the recommended rVictoria Land Use Designation. Those areas are completely described in the - Planning Commission staff report for General Plan Amendment 88 -02C. ARes :M .mg Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of May 25, 1988 Planning Commission Minutes of May 25, 1988 City Council Resolution Amending the General Plan Land Use Map fflb Chaffey College Q I� 1. mi r-�-.Gxcma m111 NEW ■ENE •i 0 P A 8 6- 0 2 C RES. NO 88 -396 == =- HWgiaaaX = = == AL -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT r- DATE: Nay 25, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner I BY: Debra Meter, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMEN' 08 -02C omen or o ow ng "parcels within the Victoria Community Plan area: from Low - Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to Low (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 227- 411-75; from Medium (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 227- 091 -9, 26, 49, 50; from Medium (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Medium -Nigh (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 227- 091-18 through 22, 25, 43; from Medium (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium (4.8 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 227- 111 -1, 33, 38; and from Neighborhood Commercial to Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 227- 171 -19. I• Aio EFe PictoriaPComunity Plansi(VCPAc88 02) which annexed eleven areas in and around Victoria into the Community Plan boundary. The purpose of this General Plan Amendment is to coordinate the General P'an Designation with the recommended Victoria Land Use Designation for each of the areas in question. I1. ANALYSIS: Of the eleven areas annexed into the Victoria Community Tun ary, five require a General Plan Land Use revision to reflect the recommended Victoria Land Use Designation. Those areas are described below: Area A Windrows Planning Area (Exhibit A) XWM7411 -75 Recommended Victoria Land Use: Lw- Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). Lc Land Use map General Plan 4 w- Medium R Residential (4 dwelling ntsper acre) to Lim (2- dwelling units per acre). This parcel is the site of the existing Casaletti Polka Palace. Surrounding development is a Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) project of single family detached homes (The Gardens) 1V PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: GPA 88 -02C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 25, 1983 Page 2 At the time of development, a cul -de -sac was built abutting the south parcel line to allow the site to eventually develop as a series of flag lots accessing the cul -de -sac The Victoria Community Plan designates all of the surrounding land as Low Res�iential. Therefore, it would be appropriate to designate thra Parcel as Low - Density consistent with adjacent development. Arad B Windrows Planning Area (Exhibit A) APR: 227 - 091 -9, 26, 49, 50. Rtcoamsended Victoria Land Use: Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). Action Required: Amend the Land Use Map of the General Plan from Residential (4- -8 & (8-14 ng udnitsTper acre). ire) LO Lor- Iledtur This is currently a vacant parcel bound to the north by Victoria Park Lane, to the west by Southern California Edison corridor, to the south by the Southern Pacific Railroad traLY.s and to the east by Day Creek Boulevard. Within the Windrows Village imaediately east of Day Creek Boulevard and the Edison corridor (approximately 500 feet total) is an existing single family attached product (The Meadows) in the Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) range. The undeveloped parcel north of Victoria Park Lane is Medium - Density, while the undeveloped parcel south of the railroad tracks is also being currently considered for annexation into Victoria as Medium -High density (Area C). This parcel would be appropriately designated Low- Medium Density consistent with the existing development east of the Day Creek Boulevard /Edison corridor. Area C The Lakes North Planning Area. (Exhibit B) APN: 227 - 091 -18 through 22, 25, 43. Recommended Victoria Land Use: Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) Action requested: Amend the Land Use Hap of the General Plan from Medium- Residential (8_14 dwelling units per acre) to Nedium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre). This parcel presently contains an existing fire station on the west portior of the site, and an approved nine acre apartment project, located part, the parcels is still used asaa Vineyard. The bound site is the west by theDay Creek Channel /Edison Corridor, ht-of-way, the south byBase /98 PLANNING C014415SION STAFF REPORT RE: GPA 88 -02C - CITY OF RANC110 CUCA40NGA May 25, 1988 Page 3 Line Road, and to the east by Bay Creek Boulevard. The property immediately north of the railroad tracks 1s also currently being Residential (Areaa8). The nProperty imedlatelyls uthdof BasenLine Road is an undeveloped parcel within the Regionally Related ctor wouldebooappropriatelyiyy desig atedf Nedfum-H ghlbecause This the parcel 2)sisicu rentlyszoned both Medlum- Htgh Lino Residential D3) his Creek anBoulevard, project at 18 dwelling units per acre and 4) is in close proximity to the proposed commercial development south of Base One Road. Area 0 The Lakes North Planning Area (Exhibit 8). APN: 227- 111 -1, 33 38. Recommended Victoria Land Use: Low- Medlum Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). Action requested: Amend the Land Use NAP of the General Plan from Medfuas- Residential (8-14 dwelling units Per acre) to Low -Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). This parcel is presently used for single family residences and a west, asen LineyRoad Sito the bound suath, Victoria single famiily residential (The Country) to the north and east. The adjacent residences are within the Low -Medium Density (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), this parcel would be appropriately designated Low- Medlure consistent with the existing development along the north and east boundaries Area E The Lakes Planning Area (Exhibit 8). APN: 227 - 171 -19. Recommended Victoria Land Use: Medtum- Residential (8 -14 dwelling y units per acre) Action requested: Amend the Lami Use Map of the General Plan fr%.d Neighborhood /Commercial to ilosum- Residential (8-34 dwelling units per acre). During ':he decided to locate planning of COmmercial sites on 0,, north side of Base Line. The parcel in question is too small to suppor• a netghLnrhood shopping center. PLANNING COMII5S.ON STAFF REPORT RE: GPA 88 -02C • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 25, 1988 Pago 4 The parcel contain' an existino ..Ouse, and is located on the Louth side of Base Linn Road surrounded by vacant land. The Lakes planning area At th1:. ctlme tistaff'sreceawenydatlone lsoto land use sa Medium- Danslty, designation and a11Ow this parcel to be considered as Part of the ove•all Master planning Of the Lakes area. III ENVIRONMEITTAL ASSI.SSMENT: The Environmental Checklist has been comp e y s a and no significant adverse environmental impacts were identified as associated with the proposed land use revisions. Staff recoamends issuance of a Negative Decl Ion for a General Plan Amendment 88 -02C. IV. FACTS FOR FINDING: Planning Commission must make the follawln9 n ngs w regard to the proposed General Plan Amendment: A. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Pian; and B. The proposed amendment would be consistent with the goals of the Land Use Element; and C. The proposed amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties; and 0 That the cubjeet properties are soitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size and compatibility with existing land use and surrounding areas V CORRESPON!,ENCE: This lien has been advertised as a Public Hearing n e �a � ep�ort newspaper and notices sent to all property owners wlthi%7UU-Teet of each area in question. VI RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of General Plan 35Fn7iFn1—W-MC through adoption of the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council and issuance Of a Negative Declaration aov Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Windrows Planning Area Exhibit '8" - The Lakes Planning Area Exhtiblit 'C' - General Plan Land Use Map ResolUfon of Approval T. .i v E` 0 MIN' 1N M" I i RR �I Y I W W Y t I Y I �LRR A V1*W o I o` W-QIORAI. 0 CMTFR s s O ► u s i E V 4p goo,- ITEM, GPI M -02G I / TITLE, 5� /,�aL° EXHIBIT, SCALE a N ling units per 75; from Medium line units per I in units oer , acre) to Low -Med 38• and from Neig unfta per acre) - , cmenement to the and Use E ement "ot 411Y 01 la Community Plan area: r e o ow ere) to Low (2-4 dwe Low - Medium (4 -( (8 -14 dwel )f per acre) APN: 227. s per acre) to LoH- Medium (4 -8 ere) APN- 227- 091 -9, 26, 49, 50; from Medium 15 -14 ere) to Medium -High (14 -24 dwelling units p(1r acre) ugh 22, 25, 43; from Medium (8 -14 dwelling units per (4-8 ood Commercial to Medium acre) Resdential 28714 dwelling 33, : 227 - 171 -19 (8-14 dwelling Oebra Meter, Associate Planner, presented the staff report Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. There were no comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Chittea, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 88 -02C to the City Council. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES COMMISSIONERS: NONE a55EHT: COIL41SSIONERS. NONE * . . . - carried 0. ENvlonuururei �.....__.._.._ --='. omen; to Section 0 p_ " - " " of the a 1t ono sett 710.050 -0 of the Development Code pertaining to the Parking and sto a of veAf cl es on Residential, Commercial an Industrial Districts. property 11 the Pichard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Sup visor, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearino. - Doug Lyon, Rancho Cucamonga resident, aske for a amendment ciarlflcatfon of this Mr. Alcorn advised that the amendment addresses rest the quantity of vehfcleS based on lot area and lim C' Mr. parking and limits vehicles can be stored on a lot. s the length of time There were no further comments, therefore the public hear n9\vas closed, Planning Commfssfon Minutes ,.�� -12 _ May 25, 1988 D:>3 i. RESOLUTION N0. ! Y r• :r A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CLVMNGA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) 88 -02C, REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE GENERAL. PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR CERTAIN PARCELS WITHIN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: 1A) . 7M LOW - MEDIUM (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE - APN: 227- 411 -75; (B) FROM MEDIM04 (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEUILLM (4 -8 DUELLING UNITS PER ACRE) - APR: 227- 091 -9, 26, 49, 50; (C) FROM MEDIUM (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIM44 -14I 0 (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) - APN: 227- 091 -18 THROUGH 22, 25, 43; (D) FROM MEDIUM (8- 14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) - APR: 227 - 111 -1, 33, 38; AND (E) FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMERCIAL TO YEDILM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) - APR: 227 - 171 -19. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga 1s processing General Plan Amendment No. 88 -02C as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On May 25, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. 88 -107 recommending to this City Council that said application be apprcved (111) On June 15, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Rosolution have occurred B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the - City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth In the Recitals, Part "A" of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing June 15, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: 7� CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GENERAL PLAN AHEkDHENT 88 -D2C June 15, 1938 Page 2 t ,1 t- :a x. 9; a) Parcel A on the attached exhibit applies to approx;rately 1.0 acre of land located on the south side of Highland Avenue approximately midway between Rockrose Street and Locust Avenue. The site is surrounded by single family residential developed to the Low Residential standards; and b) Parcel B on the attached exhibit applies to approximately 37 acres of lane located at the southwest corner of the future Victoria Park Lane and future Day Creek Boulevard The site is surrounded by vacant land, with the 500 foot wide Edison Corridor/Day Creek Channel along the west property boundary. The site most directly relates to the single family attached product developed to Lai- Medlum residential standards cast of Day Creek Boulevard; and c) Parcel C on the attached exhibit applies to approximately 34 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and future Day Creek Boulevard. The site is surrounded by vacant land, with the 500 foot wide Edison Corridor/Day Creek Channel along the west property boundary. The project takes access from two major boulevards which makes the site suitable to Medium -High Density development; and d) Parrel 0 on the attached exhibit applies to approximately 5 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and victoria Park Lane. The site is surrounded by single family residential developed to the Low - Medium residential standards; and e) Parcel E on the attached exhibit applies to approximately 1.0 acres of land located on the southside of Base Line Road and the southerly extension of Victoria Park Lane. The site is surrounded by vacant land. This area is part of the future Victoria Lakes Development. The current General Plan Designation recommended 1s Medium Residential. and f) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the Development District and with related developmert; and Th Land Use Elemeni) a his amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the h) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environi+ent nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative Declaration be issued. 3. Based upon the substantial evid2rce presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findinSs of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: 'riv✓ :" i 'na�,ithyy i' ur >N, •_ti•j;y CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.� ' GENERAL PLAN AMENOMEMT- 80 -02C June 15, 1988 Page 3 a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses penttted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b) That the propposed amendment would not have significant i - impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. , " 4. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, furtW, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth to paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant'to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 15th day of June, 1988, General Plan Nendeent No. 88 -02C. 6. The City Clerk to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. WE 3 1 r ■ haf fey ollege i a� 7 j f fit, , *az 4G�IJL �zz . .. ....... ........ .. ..... . . .......... I �zz CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra P -ter, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIR0w* 'AL LC CFt cwcur aun nrvn �.�.....m�.. - M aa:enoaenc to cnange eve opnen s r c es gna ons as th_y currently exist, to theYictorianCowunitynplan(areaC �APH: eleven -011- 08sthrough 11; 227 - 091 -4, 45, 46; 227- 411 -75. 227 - 091 -09, 26, 49, 50; 227- 091 -18 through 22 25, 43; 227 - 111 -01, 33, 38; 227 -171- 19; 227 - 161 -10, 24, 25; 227- 111.27, 30; 227 - 171 -21; 227 -211- 07, 28, 39, 229 - 021 -58 and 227 - 211 -03, 30. RELATED FILE: VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 88 -02 I R:COMMENDATION: The Pinning Commission and Staff recommend that the City Council approve Development District Amendment 88 -02. II ABSTRACT• The purpose of the Development District amendment is to accommodate the Victoria Planned Community Amendment 88 -02, which is intended to annex several out parcels within the Victoria area into the Plan Boundary (see ra DevelopmntDistrictwould change Victoria Planned the Community (VPC) for all parcels in questions. The amendment and issues are minutes for completely detailed Planned Community lCAmedment 88 -02. Re spe lly sub ted, �� ra 1 City Plap er 88 DM :mg Attachments: Planning Commission Staff reports and minutes of April 27, 1988 City Council Ordinance amending the Development District Map per/ f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 27, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Duller, City Planner Bv: Debra Meter, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL � SESSMENi ANO DEVELOPMENT DISTRIC CII. An Amon ..— thin t c k'i C 43 they currently exist, 1.) for eleven areas / - anu. 197 All n. uiruugn IL; zu- U91 -04, 45, 46; 227-411-75, 26, 49, 50; 227 - 091 -18 through 22, 25 43; 227- 111 -01, 33, 38; 227 - 171 -19; 227 - 161 -10, 24, 25; 227 - 111 -27, 30; 227 - 171 -21; 227- 211 -07, 28, 39; 229 - 021 -58; and 227 - 211 -03, 30. RELATED FILE: VICTORIA PLANNED COM14UNITY AMENDMENT 88 -02 I ABSTRACT: This is an administrative action necessitated by the c or a Planned Community Amendment 88 -02 which is intended to annex 11 out parcels within the Victoria area into the Planned Community. Consequently the Development District designations as they current exist, see Exhibit A ", would change to Victoria Planned Community (V.P.C. Exhibit -B -) If ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Environmental L ec s w respec o Victoria Planned Community Amendment 88- 02 ar4 found no significant environmental impacts related to annexing eleven parcels into the Victoria Community Plan. III FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Upon approval of the Development District amen en a ann ng Commission must find that this proposal is consistent A th the objectives of the Development Code and the General Plan, and will not be detrime.itai to adjoining properties. IV CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing ni—T a ag eport newspaper and notices were sent to property owners wlthin�00 feet of each parcel being considered. e r97", ITEM L 5' DLANNING COWnsir" STAFF REPORT v j" ODA 88 -02 - CITy t. RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 27, 1988 Page 2 IV REC"EIIDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommen approval of Development District Amendment 88 -02 to the City Council by adoption of the attached Resolution. Res ully boltt , 8 yd� city anner BB:OH :vc Attachments: Exhibit 'A" - Existing Development District Designations Exhibit "B" - Proposed Victoria Planned Community Boundary Changes Resolution Recommending Approval D1( �ARYN LANNED MMUNITY NI 41anC Av_r � 1 LM FC ICTARI PL NNI 0GP.C. ■ >ro:ll eooleva.d M rrF -N.1- - 4!r- 02 E�CH16Tt' +_� VRC a ,••: - -- � 4 i an-, miller Avenue : 'rr' •� EXISTING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NAP •� NORTH CARYN PLANNED ITEM, ��� � 02 )MMUNITY TITLE: PCOLb,�!/PC �ith�lJrY EXHIBIT: B ;Highland A..—.- FC CRC PCTORIA P NNED MMUNITi E I iPRR I� C u Y.P.C. <I 8eI lne V.P.C. >> 00 — hiller Avenue I u I i PC a �p sk m V"P. �g � 7 ni I Hr.�ll va rj ♦ \ W 1 �� r pp� p <'(°��• NEW DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NAP DEPICTING THE Our pp° % PARCELS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY a—seo NORTH K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT areas n o a c r a anne cosrunlo n annex a even 227 - 091 -4, 45, 46; 227- 411 -75; ' -?-091-9, 26M49275011 227h0 1118 thru 22, 25, 43; 227 - 111 -1, 33, 38; 227_171 -19; 227- 161 -10, 24, 25 and 227 - 111-27, 30 and 227_171 -21; 227 - 211 -7, 28, 39; 229_021 -58; 227- 211 -3, 30. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMEVOMENr 88 -02 - u nc ns 9116 ons as hey currently exist to VictoriaePlanned Community (V.P.C.) for eleven areas within the Victoria Planned Commmunity _ AFN:22 ;_011 -8 thru 11; 227- 091 -4, 45, 46; 227 - 411 -75; 227 - 091 -9, 26, 49, 50; 227 - 091 -18 inru 22, 25, 43; 227 - 111 -1, 33 38; 227 - 171 -19; 227_161 -10, 24, 25, and 227 - 111 -27, 30 and 227 - 171 -21; 227 - 211 -7, 28, 39; 229 - 021 -58; 227 - 211 -3, 30. Debra Meter, Associate Planner, Presented the staff report. Chairman Mchtel opened the public hearing. Parcel 1 _ APH: 227 -011 -8 9 10 11. Recommended Victoria Land Use: ow _ um _ u ac ere —being no public testimo Commission felt there was no change required. N'. the Parcel 2 - ApN: 227_091 -4 45, 46. Recommend Victoria Land Use: agre d uO there was no changerrequuiiired, public testimony, the Commission Parcel 3 - APNw 227 - 411 -75 Recommended Victoria Land Use: Low - Medium u _ c or u c . Bob Casaletti, owner of Casaletti's Polka Palace, questioned the intent Of the land use change and why William Lyon wants to annex their property in the Victoria Planned Community. Mr. Casaletti stated his objection to the annexation into the planned community. sold,rwhoeverelbuildsiftheret would thenebuildaltoyth eaconformityeofthe- - balance of the commmunity. It ensures that this piece of property then falls under the developmsant standards applicable to Victoria. Mr Casaletti felt this change would cake it harder for him to sell the property if and when he decides to sell. He questioned the assessments and would they benefit rim Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that selling the property and continuing the same use is allowed under the nonconformity provisions of the City. This is only long range development and Casaletti's Polka Palace is as marketable as right now. Staff s recommendation of density remains the same density as what is existing now as under the Planning Commission Minutes - 11 - a �],/ April 27, 1988 77 Development Code. The victoria Plan only brings in certain development standards that are different from the City code. This is the only affect on their property. Mrs Casalettl requested a letter from Mr. Hanson stating that she could sell the property with the continuation of the same use. Doug Lyon, representing William Lyon Company, stated in response that the Casalettt Polka Palace contributes to the community and he hopes they are able to stay there as long as they wish. Debra Meier, Associate Planner, clarified that bringing all eleven of these parcels into the victoria Plan does not put them into the assessment districts that the victoria residents are now participating in for lighting and ',andscaping. Those kinds of of assessments would not occur on these parce*'s until they develop themselves and then they would be conditioned to ,loin the assessment district• These annexations were not initiated by the Lyon Company but by the Planning Ctv"Ission when they were discussing the planning area in previons meetings. The Coaaitsion agreed that the lard use for Parcel 3 should be Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac). Parcel 4 - AF:': 227_091 -9 26 49 50 - Recommended Victoria Land se: ow- um u ac or vA -14 dpi/ac). There was no public testimony Commissioner Toistoy suggested Low - Medium as the land use designation Commissioner Chitiea felt it would be appropriate to catch the Medium designation above and below. Cosraissloner Emerick concurred with Low - Medium land use designation. The Commission's direction would be Low - Medium on Parcel S. Parcel 5 - 227_091 -18 throw h 22 25 43 Recommended victoria Land se um u ac or ua g -24 du /ac). There was no public testimony. The Commission recommended the land use change be Medium -Nigh. Parcel 6 - ow- : u a2c 7 -111 -1 33 38 . mended victoria Land Use: m or um - Reco. Mr. David Dean, Dean's Greens, stated his objections to the annexatinn to the victoria Planned Community. His concerns wtre regarding the access, victoria Park Lane, the devaluation of his property when he sells, and the potential improvements of his property. Planning Commission Minutes - 12 - Apr1i 27, 1988 ■ Y' Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated thi- property falls under the nonconforming use for what 1s on there right now. When the district changed to the residential district, then the nonconforming provisions took affect. Mr. Dean stated he did not choose to be annexed into the Victoria Planned Community and questioned what recourse he had. Dan Coleman, Se. Planner, stated that the final action would be made by the City Counc , and if the Council acts to annex, the recourse would be legal action. Ns. Marilyn Ellena Little, owner of one of the parcels, stated her problem rcgerds the legal access to her property. She stated she now has an offset 35 foot driveway that is seven feet over the property line on Dr.vid Dean's side. Where this secondary access is projected is not going to hurt her. The reason given by staff for dormgrading the density w •s caused by the Victoria Coamunity Plan. She felt It was unfair fur the City to harass the older residents because of the density change. She felt is morally wrong. Mr. Nark Noakes, resident of Victoria, stated that the propnsal is completely unfair and does not work for the residents in Victoria. Mr. Noakes questioned the reasoning behind the change to Lean's Greens and Hs tittle's property. Mr. Noak:: ;.•Wier questioned grading issues and the street. Commissioner Emerick moved to limit discussion to matters relevant to the issues regarding the Victoria Planned Community amendment. Commissioner Chitlea seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOISTOY NOCS: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY Ms. Nancy Bonanno, questioned whether the issue is whether the property should be annexed. She stated her concern is regarding the small- developer. Gwen Harris, resident of Victoria, stated her support of Dean's Greens and Ns. Little's property. The Planning Commission recommended that the land use designation be Low- Medium (4 -8 du /as). Parcel 7 - AIR: :27- 171 -19. Recommended Victoria Land Use: Medium (8- Z) ac . Planning Commission Minutes - 13 - April 27, 1989 _ air 0 There was no public testimony. ' The Commission recommended the land use designation be Medium (8 -14 du /ac). Parcel 8 221_111 -27 30; 227_161 -10 24, 25 ad 22)_171 -21. Recommended c r a an u ac T!. Mrs. Helen Diamond supported not changing the designation. The Commission recommenl -ed the land use designation be High (24 -30 du /ac). Parcel 9 - MI. 227 -211 -7 28 39. Recommended Victoria Land Use: eg ena e a ce ommerc a . Parcel !0 - "M' 229- 021 -58. Recommended Victoria Lad Use. Regional e a ce ommercciT The Commission recommended no change and supported the Regional Related Office /Commercial designation. Parcel 11 - APN: 227_2111 -3 30. Recommended Victoria Land Use. eg Una en r. The Commission rec( *ceded no change and supported the Regional Center land designation. Brad Buller, City Planner, clarified that the parcels requiring a General Plan Amendment 3,4,5,6,7. Parcelsiol 2, T8, sand Meta d to designations Qand ,.rectedl to staff to initiate General Plan Amedcants for Parcel 3,4,5,6,7 land use designations Commissioner Emerick seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following motion: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEL HOES: CCYMISSIONERS: NOME ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY Commissioner Chitiea moved to recommend to City Council approval of Osvelopeent District Amedaant 88 -02, Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion Motion carried by the following vote: Planning commission Minutes 14 - April 21, 1988 s AYES, COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, ENERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY " " * -- carried N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENOMM ae -w - '(-A reques aae eve opsen a r c s p roa -FC- Mo;d Control) o 'LM" (Low - Medium Residential, 4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for a 1.06 a—e parcel, located north of Highland Avenue, west of Millike Avenue - APM: Portion of 201 - 271 -SS. Scott Murphy, Associate Plann r, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the pubi c hearing. I Pa agreement withestaffssreclosaMa tans. Development, stated they are to Chairman McNiel closed thn public h art Cosatsslaner Chitlea moved to rec Development District Amendment 88 -05, motion. Motion carried by the followl AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOU NOES: COMMISSIONERS: WNE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY 0 MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -0S - I to City Council approval of wlssioner Tolstoy seconded the vote: Y, FN£RICK, MCNIEL -- carried RT\ An aDPaal of staff's Rehials for the building elevations of an existing YTTICe „U11 d1 g within the Office Professional District, located on the east at of Hellman, south of Base Line - APN: 208- 431 -28. stated that this meeting but heahadrmet previously tIn t ay this ith the present applicant. The applicant was to have submitted a letter requesting a continuance to the May 11, 1988 meeting. Since tivi applicant is not present, staff will request a continuance to that meeting. meeetting,oCnmissloner Tolstoys condedetheumotion. Motion carried edby the following vote: Planning Commission Minutes - 15 - April 27, 1988 ag ORDINANCE NO. 5(C t AN ORDINANCE OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING OEVELOPNENT DI57RIC7 AMENDMENT N0. DESIGNATIONS A REQUEST TO CHANGE DEVELOPMENT CIA 'LAN CE COMiUNITY AS THEY CURRENTLY DfI57, TO VICTORIA VICTORIA (V C) FOR ELEVEN AREAS NJ IN THE VICTORIA PLANNED Cpt+,UNTTY f the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does The City Council o ordain as folloWs: SECT I�1� The City Council hereby finds and determines e following of Rancho A. That the Planning commission of the City Cucamonga, following aiged by ublic law.irechoumends the rezoning and efnthe properrty hereinafterhdescr bin,thod rez °nin9 Council has held a p heard this city rescribed by law and duly time and manner p and considered said recoasao ndation. p, That this rezoning is Cucamonga• the General P1 an of the City of C. That this rezoning is consistent with the objectives of the Development code of the city of Rancho Cucamonga. p That this rezoning will have nc slnnthe °Negative environmental 10"t as provided Declaration filed herein. property s hereby rezoned SECTION 2: The following described real Map s hereby amended as in the manner s a ed, and the Development D1strlct MoD Indicated an Exhibit 'A'. �� -. I HIARYN ANNED MUNITY ah .od Avm FC ICTORIA P NNI MPRR soli c a' r K rm;. OOA R3 02 Tnu- Pro tiP. c. �icnda y EXHIBIT:�- Vic MMUNITY V.P.C. C. -- ES.P. �I .I Q Ml Iler Avenue A W NEW DEVELUPMENT DISTRICT NAP DEPICTING THE OUT PARCELS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY o eae *+ NORTF .00 CITY OF RANCHO C1JCA.110NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 196b "1- �y TO: Mayor and Membars of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL _uZq!�'SMSME-'MT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMINI7Y amKnoaKn to annex der a n areas w n e c or a Comwunity area to the Victoria Planned Com r',ty. APR: 227 - 011 -08 through 11; 227- 091 -4, 45,4; 227- 411 -75; 227- 091 -9, 26 49, 50; 227 - 091 -10 throigh 22, 25, 43; 227- 111 -1, 33, 38; 227 - 171 -19; 227- 161 -10, 24, 25; 227- 111- 27,30; 227- 171 -21; 227- 211 -7, 28, 39; 229- 021 -58 and 227 - 211 -3, 30. RELATED FILES: DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 88 -02 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02C I RECOMMENDATION• Tne Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the City Council approve Victoria Planned Community Amendment 88 -02, 11. ABSTRACT. The purpose of the Victoria Plcnned Community Amendment 1s to annex certain out parcels in and around Victoria into the community plan boundary. The intent i annexing these parcels into Victoria is that it wilt encourage Master Planning, rather than isolated development, and will maintain consistent design standards. The amendment also establishes land uses within the Victoria Community Plan guidelines. The amendment is completely detailed in the Planning Commission Staff Report and minutes. Resp ly sub /Brad " er ty Plan r BB:DM:mg Attachments: Planning Commission Staff . leport April 27, 1988 Planning Commission Minutes April 27, 1988 City Council Ordinance amending the Victoria Community Plan CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 27, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Mater, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENV.KCW NTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMURITY AMENDMENT 88 -0Z C amen n- o annex a even areas into e c or a anned Commu nity - APH: 227 - 011 -08 through 11; 227 - 091 -04, 45, 46; 227- 411-75. 227- 091 -09, 26, 49, 50; 227- D91 -18 through 22, 25, 43; 227- 111 -01, 33, 38; 227 - 171 -19; 227 - 161 -10, 24, 25; 227 - 111 -27, 30; 227- 171 -21; 227 - 211 -07, 28, 39; 229 -023- 58; and 227 - 211 -03, 30. BACKGROUND: The subject of annexing several parcels in and around ni; a 7icEo7a Community was initiated by the Planning Commission during review of the Vineyards North Area Development Plan. The Commission had indicated that th -se parcels should be annexed into Victoria to insure that development of these Parcels was consistent with Victoria Community Plan Standards. The intent in annexing these parcels into Victoria 1s that it will encourage Master Planning, rather than isolated development, and will maintain consistent design standarAs. II. ANALYSIS: A. General • There are a total of eleven areas being considered of r annexation into the Victoria Comcunity Plan. Each parcel will be discussed individually, considering the existing Development District designation, surreunding land uses and the proposed land use designation within the Victoria Community-- Plan. 1 Vineyards Rorth Planning Area (Exhibit "A') APN: 227- 011 -8, 9, 10, 11 General Plan: Low - Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Development District: Low - Medium (4 -3 du /ac) Recommended Victoria Land Use: Low - Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Site Acreage: 80 acres This parcel is currently vacant. bounded to the north by Highland Avenue, to the west by proposed single family residential, to the south by Victoria Park Lane and to the east by Rochester Avenue and the Day Creek Basin for San ITEM K PLANNING CCMMISSIr- STAFF REPORT VPCA 88 -02 - CITY RANCHO CUCAONGA April 27, 1988 Page 2 Bernardino County Flood Control. The southerly 40 acres of the parcel 1s intended for a future high school and is owned by the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. Additional access was provided to this parcel from the Vineyards North area along the north boundary of the high school site. The proposed residential areas to the west and south are developed within the Low - Medium range. It would be appropriate to maintain the similar densities within this parcel with the Low - Medium designation. 2. Vineyards South Planning Area (Exhibit "A') APN: 227- 091 -4, 45, 46 General Plan: Medium 0 -14 du /ac) Development District: Medium (8 -14 du /ac) Recommended Victoria Land Use: Medium (8 -14 du /ac) Site Acreage: t23 acres A small portion of this parcel is presently the existing lumber yard, the remainder of the site is vineyards. The parcel is bound to the north by the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks, to the west by Rochester Avenue, to the south by Base Line Road and to the east by the SCE corridor and Day Creek Flood Control Channel. There is an approved single family tract inacediately west of Rochester Avenue with a product type in the Medium zone, with an actual density of 7.40 dwelling units per acre. The undeveloped parcel north of the railroad track is also a Medium density. Immediately south of Base Line Road is the existing Rochester Tract. This subdivision of single family residences is Low density (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) These homes back onto Base Line Road, and the tract has no direct access to Base Line Road. It 1s appropriate to maintain the Medium density V designation on this parcel as it relates to the surrounding land uses. 3. Windrows Planning Area (Exhibit 'B') APN• 227- 411 -75 General Plan: Low - Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Development District: Low- Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Recom:ended Victoria Land Use- Low - Medium (4 -8 du /ac or Low (2 -4 du /ac) Site Acreage: tO.9 acres _ �a3 PLANNING CCMMISSIr" STAFF REPORT VPCA 88 -02 - CITY RANCHO CUCAMDljGA April 27, 1988 Page 3 This parcel is the site of the Palace. Surrounding developn residential protect of single f Gardens). At the time of deve built abuttigg the south parcel eventually develop as a series o cul -de -sac. Therefore It would bi this parcel as Low density c development; or Low- Aedtum dens existing General Plan designation. existing Casalleti Polka nt is a Lew density illy detached homes (The opment a cul -de -sac was fne to allow the site to flag lots accessing the appPropriate to designate nslstent with adjacent ty consistent with the 4. Windrows Planning Area (Exhibit °B') APR: 227 - 091 -9, 26, 49, 50 General Plan: Medium (8 -14 du /ac) Developiaent District: Low - Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Recomeended Victoria Land Use: Low - Medium (4 -8 du /ac) or Medium (8 -14 du /ac) Site Acreage: t37 acres This is a currently vacant parcel bound to the north by Victoria Pirk Lane, to the west by a Southern California Edison Corridor, to the south by the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks and to the east by Oa,) Creek Boulevard. Within the Windrows Village immediately east of Day Creek iisuanvexist ngns ngle family attached product n0theoLoww- Medium density range. The undeveloped parcel north of Victoria Park Lane is Medium density, while the undeveloped parcel south of the railroad tracks is also currently being considered for annexatton to Victoria as either a M^_dcum or Medium -High density use P-rcel No. 5) This parcel would be appropriately designated either Lu .- Medium or Medium Density - o A Low - Medium Density designation would be consistent with the existing development east of Day Creel Boulevard and the Edison Corridor and is also consistent with the present development district designation A Low - Medium designation would necessitate a General Plan Amendment from Medium Density to Low - Medium Density. o A Medium Density designation would be consistent with the current General Plan designation. The parcel has access .J two perimeter streets, Victoria Park Lane and Day Creek Boulevard, which would lend itself to Medium Density development. a.2 V PLANNING C"lSSIr STAFF REPORT VPCA 88 -02 - CITY .. RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 27, 1988 Page 4 5. The Lakes North Planning Area (Exhibit "C') APY: 227 - 091 -18 throwggh 22, 25, 43 General Plan: Medium (8 -14 du /ac) Development District: Medium -High (14 -24 du /ac) Recommended Victoria Land Use: Medium (8 -14 du /ac) or Medium -Nigh 114 -24 du /ac) Site Acreage: 234 acres This parcel presently contains an existing fire station on the west portion of the site There is an approved 9 acre apartment project, DR 85 -42, located approximately 550 feet east of the Day Creek Channel, but for the most part the parcel is still used as a vineyard. The site is bound to the north by the railroad right -of -way, to the west by the Day Creek Channel /Edison corridor, to the south by Base Line Road and to the east by Day Creek Boulevard. The property immediately north of the railroad tracks is annexation parcel no. 3 with a recommended zone of either Low - Medium or Medium and the property immediately south of Regionally Related sOffice /Cdommercial de designation Victoria the Victoria Plan. This parcel could be appropriately designated either Medium or Medium -High Density - o A Medium designation would be consistent with the present General Plan designation of Medium, and would also provide a greater, transition in density between the Low - Medium densities of Terra Vista and Victoria to the higher densities proposed within The Lakes Village. However, the approved project OR 85 -42 has a proposed density of 18.6 dwelling units per acre which Is within the Medium -High density range. _ o A Medium -High designation would necessitate a General Plan Amendment for consistency. The parcel has direct access to both Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard and is in close proximity to proposed commercial development south of Base Line Along with the existence of the approved DR 85 -42, a Medium -High designation would also be appropriate. 6. Tho Lakes North Planning Area (Exhibit 'C') APN: 227- 111 -1, 33, 38 General Plan: Medium (8 -14 du /ac) Development District: Medium (8 -14 du /ac) Recommended Victoria Land Use: Low - Medium (4 -8 du /ac) or Medium (8 -14 du /ac) Site Acreage: S5 acres _ aas PLANNING coMMISSir WAFF REPORT VPCA 68 -02 - CITY RANCHO CUCAHONGA April 27, 1988 Page 5 This parcel is presently used for single family residences and as a landscape nursery. The site is bound by Victoria Park Lane on the west, Base Line Road to the south and existing single family residential (The Country) to the north and east. The adjacent residences are within the Low - Medium density. This parcel could be designated either Low - Medium or Medium Density. o A Low- Medium designation would be consistent with the existing development adjacent to this parcel along the north and east boundaries. This parcel does present certain constraints on future development, due to site size and access. Exhibit "D" shows a possible street alignment which could accommodate development in a Low - Medium Density, which would be similar to density of the adjacent tract. o A Medium Density designation is consistent with the current Development District designation. Again, due to size of the site, an attached product would most likely be used to attain density in the 8 -14 dwelling units per acre range. The change in product type and density adjacent to existing single family residences would likely create :onflict. 7. The Lakes Planning Area Mililbit "C ") APR: 227 - 171 -19 General Plan: Neighborhood Commercial Development District: Medium (8 -14 du/ac' Recommended Victoria Land Use: Medium (8 -14 ou /ac) Site Acreage: ti acre The parcel contains an existing house, and is located on the south side of Base Line Road surrounded by vacant land The Lakes Planning Area is currently in the early stages of land use studies. At this time staff's recommendation is to adopt the current Development District designation Medium and allow this parcel to be considered as part of the overall Master Planning of The Lakes area. 8. The Lakes Planning Area (Exhibit "Cl) APR: 227 - 111 -27, 30; 227 - 161 -10 24, 25 and 227- :71 -21 General Plan: High (24 -30 du /ac) Development District: High (24 -30 du /ac) Recommended Victoria Land Use: High (24 -30 du /ac) Site Acreage: t14 acres _ � ab PLANNING COMIISSIf iTAFF REPORT VPCA 88 -02 - CITY ; RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 27, 1988 Page 6 The westerly portion of this parcel contains an old winery facility that is now being used by the Del Monte Company to produce vinegar. There is also an existing residence an the easterly portion of the site. The parcel is bounded by Base Line road to the north and is otherwise surrounded by vacant land. Like parcel no. 7, this is also related to The Lakes Planning Area being studied. Staff's recommendation is to adopt the current High density zoning designation and allow this parcel also to be considered as part of the overall Master Plan for The Lakes area. The Lakes Planning Area (Exhibit "C ") 9 APN: 227 - 211 -7, 28, 39 (t14 acres) 10. APR: 229- 021 -58 (t5 acres) C-eneral Plan: Commercial Development District: General Commerciai Recommended Victoria Land Use: Regional Related Office/ Commercial These two parcels are presently vacant land, bounded by Interstate 15 along the east boundary. Eventual development of these parcels will most logically be an extension of the coaaoercial activity around the regional center. Th erefore the Regional Related Office /Commercial (RR) designation would be appropriate. 11. The Lakes Planning Area (Exhibit "CO) APH: 27- 211 -3, 30 General Plan: Regional Commercial Development District: General Commercial Recommended Victoria Land Use: Regional Center Site Acreage: t-4 acres This parcel is presently vacant land bovnded by Interstate 15 to the east. This property is actually a part of the ` Rtgional Center site plan, therefore the Regional Center (RC) designation 1s most appropriate. B. EnviEONntal Assessment: Env ronnen Checklist and environmental impacts related the Victoria Community Plan. Staff has completed the has found no significant to annexing these parcels into III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to recommen approve o the annexations for these eleven parcels into the Victoria Planned Community the following findings must be made: A. Provide for the development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations. aa*7 PLANNING COMMISSI STIFF REPORT VPCA 88 -02 - CITY yr RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 27, 1988 Page 7 B. Provide for development within the District in a manner Consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City. C Provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development with the District. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e a eport newspaper and notices were sent to property owners w A.100 re'et of each parcel being considered. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Conmtsslon cons er a nput and material regarding the annexation of these parcels into the Victoria Planned Coorznity. If the Commission concurs with the Facts for Findings, adoption of thr attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. 4RL, ully si itted, r Pia ner 8B:DM :vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vineyards Village Exhibit "B" - Windrows Village Exhibit "C" - The Lakes Village Exhibit "0" - Parcel No. 6 Resolution of Approval 2a' 8 v /� • � • , - tom_ A . N Mi I• � RR I it 'co I° a u 0 I s IW WINDROWS • v 's 0 rf1lR Avvm / L REGIONAL CENT E R .il'Il' c' n'BI, TITLE T -P C�tfseS E. \HI&TT, SCALE _ K. L ,cam ,nw Lim nccaria riannea community - APB: 27 -011 -8 thru 11; 227 - 091 -4, 45, 46; 227- 411 -75; 227- 091 -9, 26, 49, 50; 227 - 091 -18 thru 22, ' -5, 43; 227 - 111 -1, 33, 38; 227- 171 -19; 227 - 161 -10, 24, 25 and 227- 111 -27, 30 and 227. 171 -21; 227 - 211 -7, 28, 39; 229 - 021 -58; 227- 211 -3, 30. WIT OF RAxella eo ., ... n . m.ge eve - aently n c Vic eve oilmen s r c es gna ons as hey currently Deist to Victoria Planned Community (V. P.C. for eleven areas within the Victoria Planned Community - APN:227 -011 -8 thru 11; 227- 091 -4, 45, 46; 227 - 411 -75; 227 - 091 -9, 26, 49, 50, thru 22, 25, 43; 227 - 111 -1, 33 38; 227 - 171 -19; 227 - 161 -10, 24, 25, and 227- 111 -27, 30 and 227- 171 -21; 227- 211 -7, 28, 39; 229 - 021 -38; 227 - 211 -3, 30. Debra War, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Parcel 1 - APN: 227 -011 -8 9 10 11. Recommended Yictor :a Land Use: ow - um - au/ac). ere lieling no public testimony, the Comission felt there was no change required. Parcel 2 227-091-4 APN: 227 -091 -4 45 46. Recommend Victoria Land Use: la - u ac , erebeing-no-public testimony, the Commission agreed there was no change required. Parcel 3 - APN: 221 - 411 -75. Recommended Victoria Land Use: Low - Medium Tr u ac or ou c- u ac . Bob Casaletti, owner of Casaletti's Polka Palace, questioned the Intent of the land use change and why William Lyon wants to annex their property in the Victoria Planned Community, Mr. Casalett/ stated his obJection to the annexation into the planned community. Chairman McNiel clarified that in the eventuality that the property is sold, whoever builds there would then build to the conformity of the . balance of the community. It ensures that this piece of property then falls under the development standards applicable to Victoria. Mr Casaletti felt this change would make it harder for him to sell the property if and when he decides to sell. He questioned the assessments and would they benefit him. Ralph F;anson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that selling the property and continuing the same use is allowed under the nonconformity provisions of the is la develofeent and Casaletti's Polka as marketable as right now. Staff s r comendaticnuf density remains the same density as what is existing now as under the Planning Commission Minutes 2 ^�- 11 - April 27, 1988 Development Code The Victoria Plan only b,irgs in certain development standards that are different from the Ci•/ code. This is the only affect on their property Mrs. Casaletti requested a letter from Mr. Hanson stating that she could sell the property with the continuation of the sane use. Doug Lyon, representing MiWam Lyon Company, stated in response that the Casaletti Polka Prlace contributes to the community and he hopes they are able to stay there as long as they wish. Debra Meier, Associate Planner, clarified that bringing all eleven of these parcels into the Victoria Plan does not put then into the assessment districts that the Victoria residents are now participating in for lighting and landscaping. Those kinds of of assessments would not occur on these parcels until they developp themselves and then they would be conditioned to join the assessment district. These annexations were not initiated by the Lyon Company but by the Planning Commission when they were discussing the planning area in previous meetings. The Commission agreed that the land use for Parcel 3 should be Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Parcel 4 - APN: 227 -091 -9 26 49 50 - Recommended Victoria Land Use un - du /ac) or = . -14 di /ac). There was no public testimony. Commissioner Tolstoy suggested Low - Medium as the land use designation. Comissidner Chitiea felt it would be appropriate to match the Mediun designation above and below. Camissioner Emerick concurred with W4- Medium land use designation. The Commission's direction would be Low - Medium on Parcel S. Parcel ° - 227 - 091-18 through 25 43. Recommended Victoria Land se: um u ac prime un- f9�i1x - ?4 du /ac). There was no public testimony. The Commission recommended the land use change he Medium -High. Parcel 6 - MN: 221 -111 -1 33 38. Recommended Victoria Land Use: Low - uv u ac or w - 4 du /ac). Mr David Dean, Dean's Greens, stated his objections to the annexation to the Victoria Planned Community. His concerns were regarding the access, Victoria Park Lane, the devaluation of his oroperty when he sells, and the potential improvements of his property. Planning Commission Minutes - li. - April 27, 1988 a33 ■ Ralph Ha.ison, Deputy City Attorney, stated this property falls under the nonconforming use for what is on there right no-w. When the district changed to the residential district, limn the nonconforming provisions took affect. Mr. Dean stated he did not choose to be annexed into the Victoria Planned Community and questioned what recourse he had. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, stated that the final action wculd be made by the City Council and if the Council acts to annex, the recourse would be legal action. Ms. Marilyn Ellena Little, owner of one of the parcels, stated her problem reqards the legal access to her property. She stated she now has an offset 35 foot driveway that is seven feet over the property line on David Dean's side. Where this secondary access is projected Is not going to hurt her. The reason given by staff for downgrading the density was caused by the Victoria CowuAity Plan. She felt it was unfair for the City to harass the older residents because of the density change. She felt is morally wrong. Mr. Mark Noakes, resident of Victoria, stated that the proposal is completely unfair and does not work for the residents in Victoria. Mr. Noakes questioned the reasoning behind the change to Dean's Greens and Ms. Little's property. Mr. Noakes further questioned grading issues and tho street. Commissi -vier Emerick moved to limit discussion to matters relevant to the issues regarding the Victoria Planned Community a%endmant. Commissioner Chittea seconded the motion. Notion carried by tia following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COHNISSIONERS: NONE AUSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BL.VESLEY Ms. Ncncy Bonanno, questioned whether the issue is whether the property should be annexed. She stated her concern is regarding the small- - developer. Gwen Harris, resident of Victoria, stated her support of Dean's Greens and Ms Little's property. The Planning Commission recommended that the land use designation be Low - Medium (4 -8 du /ac(. Parcel 7 - APR: 227- 171 -19. Recommended Victoria Land Use: Medium (8- uac. Planning Conmission Minutes - 13 - April 27, 1988 - a� .t t There was no public testimony, The Commission recommended the land use designation be Medium (8 -14 du /ac), Parcel B 227_111 -27 30. 227_161 -10 24 25 and 227_171 -21. Recommended c r a an se: g - u ac Mrs. Helen Diamond supported not changing the designation. The Commission recommended the land use designation be High (24 -30 du /ac). Parcel 9 _ APN: 227_211 -7 28 39. Rec- 4wnded Victoria Land Use: eg ona e a e ce omeerc a . Parcel 10 - "N: 229 - 021 -SB. Recommended Victoria Land Use: Reglonal e a ce eemerc a . The Commission recommended no change and supported the Regional Related Of designation. Parcel 11 - APN: 227 - 2111 -3 30, Recommended Victoria Land Use: e9 one en er. The Commission recommended no change and supported the Regional Center land designation. Brad Buller, City Tanner, clarified that the parcels requiring a General Plan Amendment 3,4,5,6,7• Commissioner Tolstoy moved to recommend to City Council approval of Parcels 1,_, 8, and 11 land designations and directed to staff to designations. Commissioner Eierick seconded the notion. S.Potion acarried by the following motion: AYES COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY ` Commissioner Chftiea moved to recommend to City Council approval of Development District Amendment 88 -02, Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion, lotion carried by the following vote: Planning Commission Minutes _ 14 - / April 27, 1988 4 T S AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLCY • • • • • • • -- carried N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENY AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 88 -05 - units per acre) \f Avenue, west of i Scott Murphy, Associat Che,rman McNiel opened to 'LM' (Loa- Med,ue 'Re3ldential, 4 -8 dwelling a 1.0E acre parcel, located north of Highland ,ken Avenue - APH: Portion of 201- 271 -55. Planner, presented the staff report. e public hearing. Mr. Craig Page, represen Ing Ahmanson Oevelopment, stated they are in agreement with staff's rec Chairman McKie] closed the is hearing. Commissioner Chitlea moved recaamaend to ,City Council approval of Development District Amerdmen 88 -05, Cow Development Tolstoy seconded the motion. Motion carried by the ollowing rote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITI TOLSTOY, ENERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ALSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY ' ' ' • • ' * * -- carried 0. MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -OS - EIFERT - An appeal of staff's ec son to deny a mo ca on w erials for the building elevations of an existing Office building within the Office Professional District, located on the ast side of Hellman, south of Base Line - APN: 206- 431 -28. Brad Buller, rity Planner, stated that the a plicant was not present at this meeting but he had met previously in the day with the applicant. The applicant was to have submitted a letter requesting a continuance to the May 11, 1988 meeting. Since the appllcann is not present, staff will request a continuance to that meeting. \ Crmmissioner Chitlea moved to continue Item 0 to the Yay 11, 1988 meting, Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion\ Motion carried by tM.e following vote: Planning Coaa,sslen Minutes - 15 - April 27, 1988 a3� ORDINANCE N0.3trp2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE RANCHO OR CITY COUNCII. ADOPTING VICTORIA CONNUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02. AN MIENDMENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN OUT PARCELS WITHIN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY AREA TO THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY - APM: 227 -011 -8 THROUGH 11; 227 - 091 -4, 45, 46; 227- 411 -75; 227 - 091 -9, 26, 49, 50; 227- 091 -18 through 22, 25, 43; 227 - 111 -1, 33, 38, 227 - 171 -19; 227 - 161 -10, 24, 25 AND 227 - 111 -27, 30 AND 227 - 171 -21; 227- 211 -7, 28, 39; 229- 021 -58; 227- 211 -03, 30. The City Council of the :ity of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this Community Plan amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this Community Plan amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 0. This Community Plan amendment will have no significant envivomeental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The Community Plan of the Victoria Planned Community is hereby amen d'as indicated on Exhibits 'A', 'B'and 'C.' r� F� RR Y ' x d z + V 1 Y Y s � o i c� 0 s a 0 u. z O � a d i i x ry 7 q >< s 3 0 ■ u YLLIR AVINUI REGIONAL O• tr r r j FOOTNRL t VntTtH ITEM+ ✓ P. —14 X9-02 TITLE+ r_� %/ e EXHIBIT- C SCALE+ f + VANDROWS NH H i x ry 7 q >< s 3 0 ■ u YLLIR AVINUI REGIONAL O• tr r r j FOOTNRL t VntTtH ITEM+ ✓ P. —14 X9-02 TITLE+ r_� %/ e EXHIBIT- C SCALE+ — CiTY OF RAA:CHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ' Date: June 15, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Eminent Domain action to acquire public right -of -way necessary for two (2 Properties n or the eAaetust «Streetlat919thiStreet Project, identified ss: APM 202 - 111 -06 and APM 202 - 111 -16. RECDNEIDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of attached Resolution of Necessity to Condemn right -of -ways to rorldt for the construction Of street Improvements along property frontages at: 6•r0S Amethyst Street, APM 20 "- 111-06 and 9529 19th Street, APN 202 - 111.16 in conjunction with the Amethyst at 19th Street StOru Drain and Strec,' Improvement Projoct. RACRau_ WD /NIALTSI_; On May 18, 1988, the .-.ity Council had directed staff to proceed with a schedule of Public Hearing for this meeting "or the purpose of hearing on the project lsep the manner thattdillebeimostae project; 2) the greatest public good and the least private injury; and o3jathe right -h of -ways sought to be acquired are necessary for the project. Notices Easement of necessary Intention for adopt right-of-ways of of Necessity the tendednd street improvements were mailed n May 23, 1988. As Of Mts date, formal offers have been made per value based upon real estate property appraisals for the needed roadway easements for the AmetVst at 19th Street Storm Drain and Street Improvement Project, without success in getting the right- of -wAys for APNS 202- 111 -06 and 202- 111-16. Although negotiations continue, it is felt necessary to simultaneously proceed with right -of -way condemnation to avoid further delay in the schedule of construction for such project. ccSR June 15, 1982 Page 2 Staff recommends that Council adopt the attached Resolution based upon ofelawba plicablerthereto, andnshailadirectathe City Attorneyetorinittate proceedings for r1 ht -of -way condemnations and do all things necessary to prosecute said actions to its final determination. Respec ubeitted, A RMNX Attachment �Ya 1! ' MaM TION OF MAILING OF NOnCE OF CW MfION TO CONGEIM PROMTIES BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, City dark, City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares as follows: That on May 23, 1980, I mailed, by certified sail, return receipts requested, copies of the attached °Notice of Intention of the City of Rancho Cucamx,nga to adopt 3 Resolution o° Necessity to Condemn an Easement for the Construction of Amethyst Avenue at 19th Street Improvesents at the nortmarn portinn of properties, Assessors Parcel Nos. 202 - 111 -06, 202- 111 -16 and f6e- 661 — % to all persons owning an interest in :aid parcels whose praperties may be acquired and whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized tax roll and anyone who to the Citl•'s knowledge has an interest in said properties The names and addresses of all persons to whom said notice were mailed are set forth on Exhibit '1' attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that the foregoing 1s true and correct and that this decta•ation was executed this day of 1988 at Rancho Cucamonga, California t; iY Bever y A. Authelet, City Clerk 1 ay3 r KESDLUr1aK >n.$ II- X97 A RESOLUTION OF TIE CITY COMIL OF THE CI if OF RA11W CIICAAMA DECLARING THE PtXLIC IEID 40 NECESSITY TO COMM A PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CULAINAM AND MAKING FINE: MS IN 5 WVMT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (1) 11be City of Rant* Cucamonga has conductaJ a study pertaining to the design, construction and alignment of a strent wldenin3 project for Amethyst Avenue at 19th Street. Rased upon the study cend;icted. It has been determined that the .Yost reasonable and feasible alignment for the proposed street widening will raquiro the acquisition of a right -of -ways at portions of a residentially zoned parcels, more particularily desc�fbe-1 herein; (ii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Govertatnt Code Section 7267.2, prior to adopting 0fs Resolution, the City has mada an offer to the owners of record to acquire the properties for the full amount of fair mariat values as established by independent appraisal valuations/ (111) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 10404, a City may acquire private property b; condemnation when it is necessary for extending and widening streets, as well as for the construction of drains, scwers and acqueducts; (Iv) On June 15, 1988, this Council held a duly noticed public hearing oursuant to the terms o. California Node of Civil Procedure Sectloh 1245 235 and said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and, (v) Ml legal y.-erequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Rcsolution. B. Pa:olution MO. MEREFORE. it 1s hereby found, determined and re�olvcd by the City Council of r1e City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: In a'1 respects as set north in the Recitals, Part A, of this Reso ul�— SECTION 2: Those portions of the properties which are requi -ea for a right- of -aay of street widening purposes are situated in the City of Rancho Cucaxnga, County of San 6ernardinc, State of California, and arc more specifically outlined in the leg1 Jeser'ptlons and maps attached hereto as 1 � 77 Exhibit 'A' and Exhibit W. and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council ur ng above - referenced public hearing, including written staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: project; a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed b' The pDroposed project is planned or located in the msnner :hat will be most compat161e with tha greatest public good and the least private injury; C. The portion of properties defined in this Resolution are necessary for the proposed project; and, d. M offer of fair market value has been made to the owners of said real pr oerties pursuant to the terms of California Goverment Code Section 7267.2. the proper es ascribed in Section 2, domain. The City Attorney is ordered Superior Court of tha State of Califor the name of the City of Rancho cucawn the properties described herein Cnr th right -of -ways for street purposes, and said action to its final determinatio., law applicable thereto. The City Atto make applications to said Court for an wky of money deposits as say be directs permitting the City to take possession uses and purposes herein dascribed. hereby declares its intention to acquire above, by proceedings in eminent and directed to bring an action in the nia for the County of San Bernardino, in 9%. against all owners and claimants of a purpose of condemning and acquirlhg a to do all things necessary to prosecute to accordance with the provisions cf li;ey is authorized and instructed to Order fixing the amount of security by id by said Court and for an Order and use of said real property for the SECTION 5: The City Clf:k shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution 2 �J r a e r t It Ala" and Nineteenth St. Lpnreoents I Ilaaalllaw aar/e�. �, (T1T•.ef trim Qrweew tn+r troops aaagn ' CU d Rrelo tree.6. r.o. Non 6pT RwW Craw*a64 G rant .rNaav�nrtaw roeaeppAaaalr @. __ FASEMENT FOR A YAWAYA COp MERAT1ON, t,dal of.Nli Y Nally rJmow:ad6sd, e 1R<_IIE IpRYAPI. • Yldw. GRA!! M b tea clyof m— c mossomNS. • moodew c,.,.doo, on RA.SEMM for Stress and Related purposes Cbl,UWC,k Dammed! popwa '4tlVCYyefR>veLnConwopp.CwmyefSm Bwwd•ao.SWSof r Fb0e*r. That portion of lot 1. Opts S. Cucaoongyl 110s eeStead Association Lands, as par plat recorded le Spot 6 of Ibps, page 16. Retards of an Bernardino County. as dsetrftsd as foliws: Comeamirg at the RC.thKSt Corner of Let 1, thence Swth along the Fast Ilne of Amethyst Asen" a distance of 75.60 feet; theme flortn• ea ;tarty along a Corse concave to tea ]0utheatt With • radlvs of N If fast to • paint 11.00 pat Swth of & H 24.00 feet East of ltw slid Northeast corner of Lot 1, them* Easterly parallel olth the Norm line of sale Lot 1 a distant* of 16.70 feat; thence at right login Northeria and parallel rrlth b. Nest line of Let 1 a distant@ of 11.:4 Mt; theme at riyyat an71cs Iksterly alon00 the NO'-'A line of save Lot I a distant@ of 40 fAl fast to the polnt of Wghnfng. w foreneattaned pntfan to hacam a part of Amethyst Avenw aW hinetrnth street Exhibit or is attached memo and mde • part amf by this nfertm@ IDated _ I aNMN A tleaWL mm r callfarn4 Inssow _ a Ca•.nilsr son sermralne ebmsrayrd rbV.l4prrt p*vWraapp@*rad C1 py*ytdh aiwnbllM O YTaabrMMT. wata orrWbcbryarl0.nta bbd*par.v(y �near�w..rld - �`-'bM wu@a awnwwt ud *rane�ha.M tee. ......, q W ITM[ad nil err M @RC1Y aw "is Is A eaTYL Impalmplp0rt. ayaell paq noru 1tu0@ptpetnpr t.s. rARlrWrtr. aoasvAn,t[c. f • ' 4, t U T Scale .1' . 20' PART TAKE DI" 1 9!a Street 1�Part Tan 563.6 square leaf APIL202.111 -06 3,328 square feet dF' APA 202.0 -05 2.000 square feet , 03- 87.317 37 ■ i1 j A Am"t Alen $ 6 Nineteenth Street llprorezbnts MapaagaeaV wn CSI of Rasio cac aoafa eMp aedoaaos4ATO Chi of Itaadlo CMacap P.O. Boa W7 Rambo Eti•• CA 81710 araa ASOnteea Isla rpa aacaoara lBt EASEMENT FOR A VAI.UARLIS C0C67OP.RAT70N. eset/p d srbkb k hereby &cM"kd,4 CIARAE R. BIIESEN and IALYORIE C. OOESEN 11u.-band and Wife, as Joint Tenants f GRAMM b the City of RenrM C]oaxp, a h ocliyal COMMILIee, u PAMMENF for Street and Related Psrposes le, era and apon Iba artah, teal p W etly to the CRy oC Rambo Clcammp. Carry of Sap Bapudieo. Strte of CAUmda, Desalbed u FoORee The Northerly II.tO feet of tee Easterly 0611 fat of the Rest 208.7 fast of the north 709.7 feet of Lot 1. Block 6, CIICNIOnGA IIVIESTEAO ASSOCIATION, as pr plot mordec In Boot 6 of Reps. Page 16, Records of San Bernardino County, State of California. Exhibit •B' is attatched hereto and rude a part hereof of this reference. and �. c %S, /9 G,4 irv..• r / ..1 ✓ I 0414 M Acxyyvncnowe7aT 6wea reitfnrnla y,purPydera c /��/1C I�aebnn , , Cana An Beme.dlrw Just,th <3 iicosfa IM�lwbnpn0NStlwrll ,br�i.orrw�Jnntl�raoo.iro dtnAt scu Auml A AcadrA /J A[���� , [ �Q /,(�P !!. C /!A%� r' /K/ //C S•J62C�2F/i was.-, war�wsw . sw RleW0eq O}MeY O prwrhant.n,wma Wf [eMxiw, �ao.eG b,rMp Mtwaaetlb4ebrrr ndanu bass eMit.sorfrlabunvraq �L�. blM ww .,baUra MaweM and ecaro.wdpM eel %�1 Ny KutrL0. - q-Jrr4Ml6Vl IUgMA KASw awr nT andsnKw wY W fow rwbR un nO ea A CaauAt .mlWN.a%a,Ql, stns horn ""'OIOT. t.a. eYneegale, mumusa,rtc. 946 Til if Tr t I t L", -, TH.., � ---�_-,_--- -,_' / | . . | � ^ ' r 6 EXHIBIT '1' Names and addresses of persons to whm notice was wiled: -" 1. Irene Horvath 1040 E. 7th Street ' Upiaad, G 91786 e 2. Clark H. Boesen Marjorie C. Seem 9529 19th Street Rancho Cucatonga, CA 91701 i r t� {�araakh Fbr CAPcamongo Homeslead Association Zo z -I IM No ^ta &V9 202111 -t[v /0 •f0[/✓E'1 Y I roc 1 1 •IK SAEA -- N �esp 66� +s •: n. m 6 6a..t _ l2 •Y•..w �fr•yY �r�•r W.•I.ry«.�yF- «•�.•Yr /- �./I \Y•./ 1 N<+1 m4p ft, 612416. Pf1.66/.1 Par, piecl Ha 9260. 4 170144•46 Nrt�'1 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT Date: June 15, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Rustoll H. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer S� Subject: Public Hearing for the purpose of hearing and passing upon objections or protests, if any, which may be raised Dy any property owners or other interested persons regarding the Notices of Construction that were posted on May 23. 1988 at 6705 Amethyst St., and 9529 19th Street, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911. It 1; recomaended that City Cuuncil adopt the attached Resolution ordering the City Engineer, acting as Superintendent of Streets, to proceed with the installation of frontage improvements at AIN 202- 111 -06 and APN 202 - 111 -16, if such improvements have not been installed 60 days after June 15, 1988 in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 and order the formation of an assessment district for APH Nos. 202- 111 -06 and 202 - 111 -16. 6ACMOtW /ANALYSIS• On May 23, 1988, the attached 'Notices of Construction' were posted in front of the properties located at: 6705 Amethyst Street, 9529 19th Street and 6714 Amethyst Street and identified as APM Nos. 202- 111 -06 and 2D2- 111 -16 respectively. These Notices were posted in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 and order the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street trees, street lights, base pavements, street pavements, grading, clearing and grubting and all other incidentals therewith. The property owners are instructed that they are given 60 days from the date of enactment of the 'order to construct, said improvements. After the 60 days shall expire, the City Engineer, acting as the Superintendent of Streets, will cause the improvements to be constructed and the property owners will be assessed for all the costs introduced within the corresponding property frontages. The costs will be paid from the formation of an assessment district which will include APR Nos. 202- 111 -06 and 202- 111 -16 which are described as follows: eqo CCSR Re. Notice of Construction June 15, 1988 Page 2 A. APN No. 202 -111-06 That portion of Lot 1, Block 8, Cucamonga Homestead Association, as per plat recorded in Book 6 of Maps. Page 46, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest toner of Lot % thence South along the East line of Amethyst Street, 83.2 feet; thence East 40 feet; thence North 83.2 feet to the North line o7 said Lot 1; thence Nest 40 feet to the point of beginning. B. APN No. 202- 111 -16 The Easterly 81.35 feet of the Nest 208.7 feet of the North 208.7 feet of Lot 1, Block 8, Cucamonga Hemestead Association, as per map recorded in Book 6 of Maps, Page 46, records of said County. EXCEPT therefrom that portion as conveyed to Oreil a K. Doyle, et us., in the tax deed recorded February 27, 1976 In Book 8872, Page 918, Official Records. Upon hearing protests or objections, if any, at the public hearltaff ny Council is requested to make a ruling and directive to $ regarding protests and make directive to the City Engineer, acting as the Superintendent of Streets, to proceed with the said improvemnts, if such have not been constructed by August 15, 1988 and to further order the formation of an assessment dfstric• which will include the listed parcels to pay for said improvements. Respectful bmitted, RHM. Attachment A RESOLUTICR OF THE CITY COCNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT 6705 AMETHYST STREET, APR Na. 202- 111 -05; 9529 19TH STREET, APR No. 202 - 111 -16, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES FOR STREETS k4D HIGHWAYS SECTION 5870 THRU 5880 MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 WHEREAS, on May 23, 1988, the City Engineer acting under the authority of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga had posted at the subject location a Formal Notice to Construct Public Imrprovements. WHEREAS, on this date June 15, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has met to bear ali protests or objections from any interested parties to the Order to Construct; and upon hearing all objections, resolves in the common interest of public health, safety and welfare for the City of Rancho Cuca.�eonga that public Improvements be made at 6705 Amethyst Street, APR No. 202 - 111 -06 and 9529 19th Street, APR No. 202- 111 -16. NOV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve and otherwise issues an 'Order to Construct" street frontage improvements consisting of parking lane pavements, curbs gutters, sidewalks, parkway grt.;ing, drive approaches and street lights and ail incidentals thereto in coaformance to the *Standard Drawings' of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 1984 Edition with supplevents through 1981, with all plans and construction work being subject to review and permit by the Engineering Division of the Community Development Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. All work shall commence within sixty (60) days of the execution of this resolution and if not commenced or provision made therefore to the satisfaction of this City Council, the City Engineer, acting as Superintendent of Streets, shall cause such construction to be made, and in pursuance to the statutes of the California Codes for Street A Highways shall proceed with actions to assess the costs therefore as tax lien upon that real property described as: Those lands situated in the State of California, County of San Bernardino and described as follows APU No. 202- 111 -06 Mat portion of Lot 1, Block S. Cucamonga Homestead Association, plat recorded in Book 6 of Maps, Page 46, records of said County, described as follows: ~ ♦ Y e° Resolution No. June 15, 1988 Page 2 Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 1; thence South along the East line of Amethyst Street, 83.2 feet; thence East 40 feet; thence North 83.2 L feet to the North line of said Lot 1; thence Nest 40 feet to the point of beginning. B. APN No. 202- 111 -16 The Easterly 84.3S feet of the West 208.7 feet of the North 208.7 feat of Lot 1, Block 8, Cucamonga Homestead Association, as per map recorded in Book 6 of Naps, Page 46, records of said County. EXCEPT therefrom that portion as conveyed to Orville Records. K. Boyle, at ax., in the tax deed recorded February 27, 1976 in Book 8872, Page 918, Official ■ — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhIONGA STAFF REPORT ' DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 29 FOR TRACT NO. 13644, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND THE SOUTH SIDE OF VISTA GROVE STREET TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 29 t. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 29 to Street Lighting Maintenance D strict No. 2 for Tract No. 13644, located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue and the south side of Vista Grove Street. The developer of the subject tract has been notified r/ the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -311. Respect 1 submitted. . � Attachments pG , RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 29 TO STREET LIGHTING MAIHTENAMCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13644 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 10th day of May, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -312 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 29 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 8C -312 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit or Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement', .was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real p- oper'y proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -312, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by tiw amity Council of the CJty of Rancho Cucamonga at the public interest and conveniance requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -312, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a—nr- SECTiON 3: The assessments and methcd of assessment in the Engineer's e�l'1 p—are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said trac s eve been occupied. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 29 for Tract No. 13644 SECTION 1. Authority for Report Tnis report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Hlghwa s Code. State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912. SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments Into Street Lighting Maintenance District Ho. 2. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will havu an effect upon ail lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The fuinlshing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating aid servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specific.tions The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street ,fights are as stipulated In the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development 1s hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district Include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for tae illumination of the subject area. _ a3� SECTION 4. Estimated Costs NO costs will be o construction. Allimprovementswill rbetconstruct %ld by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenanct costs fm, assessment Purposes will be as indicated below. These costs tre estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Industrial. coinnercialiandn institutional projects thro ughout o ughoutthelcity. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commerclal and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units 1n residential zones. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 is shown balcw: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No, of Loops Lamp Lamps Annex New Lamp Size* YTD No 29 Total_ 5800L 1,345 13 1,358 9500L 4 0 4 *High Pressure Sodlun Vapor Total Lamp Site Lams Rate Ma's Total Annual Maint. Cost 5800L 1,358 X S 8.93 X 12 $145,523.28 9500L 4 X $10.16 X 17 • _ 487.68 Total Annual Maint. Cost $146,010.96 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • S'OOO Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 24 Total Assessment Units 5,024 3. Lost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost S14696 No, o n s n str ct 529.06 /year /unit Assessment ahall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. - a6s SECTION S. Assessment Diagram report pand labeledp•Street Lighting Maintenance Distrlcth No. t24, this Annexation Mo. 29. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be aqual for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council craducts public nearing, considers all testimony and determines to fom a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year Sn May the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. - asp asVi.:S Yy_, ?`J EXHIBIT 'A• Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 29 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: Assess. N0. Of Lamp$ LO be Annexed Project Acreage —liL 'S BOOL 95D(J�- 10.0001 1t0WL TR 13644 ___ 24 13 ___ ___ ___ ___ i y4 l L\ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXATION NO. 29 � L 1 oy II > WI Lggf:navr ,O i 1•. iI le '• f•Ix�i- �' fe gel - -- 13 4 1� ]CS......• > ; CITY OF gANCHO CUCAYONtIA S� (AUNTY OF a" MNARDINO OF CALIFORNIA c. Sis4 STATII N Boom r 5 } — CITY OF RANCTIO CUCAMONGA c, STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1388 10: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russeil H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 47 FOR TRACT NO. 13644, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVCNUE AND THE SOUTH SIDE OF VICTORIA GROVE STREET, TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 RECOMME11111TION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 47 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS At',ched for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 47 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract No. 13644, located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue and the south side of Victoria Grove Street. The developer of the subject tract has been notified of the public hearing by mall. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -313. Respectful subm,�tted, RV. ) /ww-� Attachments - a6P ,,. - RESOLUTION H0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CI1Y COUb .L OF THE CITY OF RAHCF'^ CUCAHONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH Atjic`+IION NO. 47 TO LANDSCAPE M4INTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ARJ ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT No. 13644 Cucamonga id on th 18th day ofEMay, 1985,CadoptoitsiResoiutioniof Intention No. 88314dto order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 47 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-314 was duly and legally published to the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of tha passage of said Resolution of Intention, heaoed •Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the Lima, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property Proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88_314, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly matted In the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the conterplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of-- . Rancho Cucamonga t at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described to said Resolution of Intention No. 68 -314, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer s ere y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment —in tFe— Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. .. d4b CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 47 for Tract No. 13644 SECTION I. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with 'he requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General This MaintenancetDistricttN0 al.etTheeCity all new Into areas toe be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract No. 13644 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications for the The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions Of approval ReferenceeIs thereby adeatoatheosubject ttractimapnorndevelopmentsplan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development 15 hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All Improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysts and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment Purposes will equal thirty ($.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will.. _ be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 47 1s as follows: Existing Artnex New District No. 47 Tntal Landscape Area 1,186,336 4,630 1,190,966 NO. of D. U. 9,757 24 9,781 Per Lot Annual Assessment 1,190,966 X $.30 • $357,289.80 $357.289.80 • $36.53 , 9,781 _ aGi Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector street., which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will b e maintained by an active homeowners 4- soclation, these assessments shall be reduceA. SECTION S. Assessment Diaortm labeled +E,shibit A', obysthissreferencedtherdiagramtischereby incnrporattdand within the test of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment l lotswwithinn thesDistrict District are found to be unit11 Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. actual lassessm i l d public hearing in entsbasedupontheactualcostsincurred�by to the Citynduring the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2 City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets Public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modif ;es and approves the individual assessments. -_a�a yyP 1 Y ✓� ' '9.i r '!u 4j Y.1 Properties and tnance fists ct be included witntn Annexation No. I Lr, a ' Landscape Maintenance District No. 47: ,stsl fi. TRACT M4TNTATNEO AREA Mu YWYMM 13644 24 Community Trail ___ 4,630 .r �r f� tai' +'S ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ], LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 j ANNEXATION NO. 47 s •. Ie. r arzz.�ut_ ] ] ' � i ] 4r li •�I _ I Zit. to .. .�y xrasrra rEm 1 ] I _ •�I'J]G2... u.. �� 1 I �-�- ••'++moron_ er ♦ i r .Nu pf 4p %V, ��"\` -^ CC ; c OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA R a tP*w�v 3 ENGINEERING DIVISION ci Pr VICINITY MAP r1� un -- « �I » • i 1•,a- DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 15, 1 }°.8 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide ORDERING THr WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 45 FOR TRACT NO. 13644, PM 9504, CUP 87 -04 AND OR 86 -32 (LOT S. TR 12176` ;VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RECOlMEMDkTIOM: It is recommended that City Councll approve the attached resolution ordering the work In connection with Annexation No. 45 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 45 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract No. 13649, PM 9504, CUP 87 -04 and DR 86 -32 (lot 5, TR 12176) (various locations throughout the City). The developers of the subject projects have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -315. Respect 11 fubmitted, RNM J Attachments - 46� s, V RESOLUTION 40, g b -y0r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN Ca41ECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 45 TO gTREET LIGHTING 141INTEHANCE DISTRICT NO. I. AND ACCEPTING Tai FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 13644, PM 9514, CUP 87 -04 AND DR 86 -32 (LOT S. TR 12116) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 18th day of May, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -316 to order the therein described voi* in connection with Annexation No. 45 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -316 was duly and legally published in the time, fors and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Cleo'.:; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolu:ion of Intention, headed `Notice of Improvement ", was duly and legally poster in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as apppears from the Affidavit of Posting sold notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly walled to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in snld Resolution of Intention No. 88 -316, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamc,ga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction fact in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work ano the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Caincil having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cueam—on—ga-That the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set firth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -316, be done and made; and SIJION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer 1s hereby finally approved; and— SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer'stepri -are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts ave been occupied. �?G6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 45 for Tract No. 13644, Parcel Map 9504, CUP 87 -04 and DR 86 -32 (Lot S. TR 12176) SECTION 1. Authority for Reoort This report is to CaVIiance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Hlghwaps Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Souncll has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within, said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is an file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and test shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated to the conditions of approval for the development and as rpproved by the City L.;ineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the -epair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. a6 7 A SECTIC1 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All Improvements will be constructed by developers Based on available data, it is eutinated that maintenance Costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zane 1 is comprised of street light improvements on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi - family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional Projects throughout the City. It has beer, determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cast for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Erergy Cost: No. of Total Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lam; Size* YTD No. 45 Total 6800L 460 0 460 9500L 520 4 524 16,0001. 16 0 16 22,0001. 4 0 4 272500L 17 0 17 aHigh Pressure Sodium vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Ma's Maint. Cost " SBOOL 460 X S 8.93 X 12 f 49,293.60 95DOL 524 X $10.16 X 12 63,866.08 16,000L 16 X $12.08 X 12 2,319.36 22,0601. 4 X 113.24 X 12 664.32 27,500 17 X $15.31 X 12 3.123.24 Total Annual Malnt. Cost $119,286.60 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess U-'ts before this annexation • 16,955 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 65 Total Assessment Units 17,020 ads `I: 1I 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost No. o n is n str ct • f119, 86.60 • $7.00 /year /unit Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as expiained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled Street Light'ng Maintenance District No. I% Annexation No. 4S. These dfagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the Cdstrict are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearino date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. r . M D EXHIBIT 'A' - 5,', jY Properties and improvements to be Included within Annexation No. i 45 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Assess. No. of LaR s to be Annexed Pro ect Acrea a U_T{— Zone 1 . TR 13644 - -_ 24 ._. 4 ___ _._ _ -- Zone 2 r PM 9504 pcI 1 .83 1,6 ___ __.. ___ pcI 2 .48 .9 - -- pcI 3 2.64 5.3 -__ - -- ___ -_ - -- pcl 4 .62 1,2 -__ _._ ___ - -- ___ pcl 5 2.38 4.8 -__ _._ ___ - -_ ___ pcl 6 4,27 8.5 - -- _._ .._ _ -- pcI 7 .91 1,8 pcl 8 1.02 2,0 -__ ___ .._ --- -- - -- ._. pcl 9 64 1,2 _ -_ .__ ___ ___ ___ pcI 10 .48 1 0 .._ ___ --- --- ._. pcI 11 _87 1.7 15.95 32.0 (lights previously annexed per Annexation No. 28) CUP 87 -04 pct 2 ,60 1,2 .._ _._ ._. -.- ___ pcl 3 1,95 3.9 -__ _ -- __. -__ ___ pcI 4 1_29 2.6 _ _ _ 3.84 7 7 - -- .__ - -- _ -- ___ DR 86 -32 (lot 5, TR 12175) .59 1.2 ... TOTAL 20.38 65.0 - -- 4 . -- [; ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 95 ai` ; ITY - C OF RANCHO CUCA1[ON(}A s, COUNTY OF SAN BEBNARAINO STATE OF CALUPORMA Why Im �� i s ,reiy E � I 17 �16 1 �lii• •D, • � .P • I d • i i r ai` ; ITY - C OF RANCHO CUCA1[ON(}A s, COUNTY OF SAN BEBNARAINO STATE OF CALUPORMA Why Im �� i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. :Z ANWXATION NO. -/6- TERRA VISTA VILLAGE BASE LINE ROAD � J z Wr ylsd m ; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _: • COUNTY OF UN WMNARDINO LY e: s STATE OF CAL17ORNIA 1'117 � ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. ¢r 87 -04 J k S.,P ;^ L07 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TY OF SAN' BERNARDINO �• `° ; TATE OF CALII►+ORNIA -. 1�v�}I• W 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 45 " \�. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN HERNARDINO z1 v" ' % STATE OF CALIFORNIA a 1g DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONOA STAFF REPORT June 15, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aioe ORDERING THE. WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANMEXATIaI NO. 20 FOR riP 81 -04 AND OR 86 -32 (LOT 5, TRACT 12176) (L MERCIAL /INOuSTRIAL) TO LANDSCAPE MAINTFNANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RECOM EMDATION: It is recomaended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work In connection with Annexation No. 20 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /A.YALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 20 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for CUP 87 -04 and OR 86 -32 (Lot S. Tract 12176) been notifieddofithel)publich hearing bysma 1 the Thebatt ched Jesoslution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -317. Resoectf �jblys�ubbmitted, RUM:JA:diwi� Attachments 7 r a. RESOLUTION NO. 00 9 40t A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 20 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR CUP 81 -04 and OR 86 -32 (LOT S. TRACT 12116) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 18th day of May, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -318 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 20 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -313 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown hw the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the iffice of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed `Notice of Improvement•, was duly and legally posted In the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposes to be assessed for the improvements described In said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -318, according to the names snd addresses of such owners as the same appears an the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,jurisdiction fat's in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdiction to order the propr�ed work SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of` Rancho Cucamonga t at the public Interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the orderii,? of the work, and said City Council hereby Orders that the work, as set forth ;id described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -310, be done and made; ant SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer sl5y finally approved; and SECTION 3• Be It further resolved Goat the assessments and method of asses smen n e nglneerIs Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin untMa t%r-6o percent of said tracts have been occupied. 0176 CITY OF RANC'10 CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 20 for CUP 07 -04 and OR 86 -32 (lot 5, TR 12176) SEC;ION 1. Authority for Report This report is In compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECT;GN 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are sham on the re:orded Nap as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference Is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development Is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION .. Estimated Costs No tests will be Incurred by the District for parkway and median Improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or /by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed - work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be eased on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 Is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed to October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the project boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. 6�77 I N Zone 2 is comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east city limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and some parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation me. 20 is as follows. Zone 1 Existing Total estimated District maintenance cost $2,070 Assessment units 8 Total cost - assessment unit for year and month $2 070 - • 5258.75 /year or $21 56 /mo. /lot Zone 2 — Existing Annexation New Total estimated annual District No. 20 Total maintenance area - Sq. Ft. 0 0 0 Assessment units, acres 380,634.5 4.43 380,639 Total cost ♦ assessment unit for year and month 0 x 5.30 • SO /year 0 /mo. /acre � F Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Sectlgn 6 and tha - attached assessment diagram. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram labeled 'E t xhibi attached to this incorporated within within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Imrovement the s District dnd t that assessmenttshalloba equall "or neach parcel fo: Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for each jut or parcel in Zone 2. d7d The City Council W171 hold a public hearing in June, to, determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs Incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments ns required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. e SECTION 7. Order of Events 'i I. City until adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer s Rept • 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. ti a 3, City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and } determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. ''• 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and • approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessmants• a7F I Properties and isorovemmts to be included within Annexation No. 20 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PR L..rIES PROJECT ACREAGE CUP 87 -04 (pcls 2, 3 Z 4 of PM 5803) pcl 2 .60 pcl 3 1.95 pcl 4 1___2", 3.84 OR 86 -32 (lot 5, TR 12175) _59 TOTAL 4.43 IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION NO. 1 Area a. Ft. Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 m 'w .r :m 1 f ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM i LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. i I •f i CUP 87 -04 I I I x' i LE �0► 1 C SCSI) Y•Wx. f r 1.f'f IGM/C I t i HIGHLAND AVENUE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA I ENGINEERING DIVISION f +� VICINITY MAP i F M ` .•i• I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.-3 ANNEXATION NO. $p %`� CITY OF RANCHO CUC.WONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION A � T b' im6 VICINIri NIAP Il \�11 I ., — CITY OF RANCHO CUCARIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH AIt4EXATION NO. 16 FOR CUP 07 -04 AND OR 86 -32 (LOT 5, TRACT 12176) (COMMERCIAL /INOUSTRIAL) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RECOMMENDATION: It 1s recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution o:dering the work in connection with Annexation No. 16 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 16 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for CUP 87 -04 and OR 86 -32 (Lot 5, Tract 12176) (Co mercial /Industrial. The developers of the subject projects have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -319. Respectf )I Omitted, RHM:JA. Attachments RESOLUTION N0. U b - q03 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT7 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA ORDERING THE WORK iN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 16 TO STREFT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR CUP 81 -04 AND OR 86 -32 (LOT 5, TRACT 12116) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 18th day Of May, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -320 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 16 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -320 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed •Notice of Improvement•, was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by lax, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real prorerty proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention ontheclastemailinghornaeknown addresses k owners as City of Ranch, Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and oral and documEentary. Council factsdin considered concerning the necessity for the conte ptited work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho �ucmmonga at 'ne public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby ord.•rs that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -320, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a�— SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's epo-e are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said trac s eve been occupied. CISY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 16 for CUP 67_04 and OR 86 -32 (lot S. TR 12176) SECTION 1, Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Strcets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2, General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has oetermined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for rith the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which 1s on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general oenefit to all areas to the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTIOd 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated to the conditions of approval for the developaent and as approved by the City - Engineering Division. Reference is t,ereby made to the., subject tract map or development plan and the assessmert diagram for the exact location of street the lighting improvement ay.'athe individual a development aisohereby made a part Of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include- the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of tha subject area. CM5 SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as Indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land In industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the sane benefit as two assessment units to residential zones. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No, of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size' YTD No. 16 Total SBOOL 47 - 47 9500L 2 3 5 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate No S Maint. Cost 5800L 47 X S 8.93 X 12 $5,036.52 9500L 5 X $10,16 X 12 609.60 Total Annual Maint. Cost $5,646.12 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess units before this annexation • 444.5 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 8.9 Total Assessment Units 453.0 3 Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost • $5 646.12 f12.46/year /unit N0. 0 n s n District Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled •Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6• Annexation No. 16. These diagrams are hereby Incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the listrict are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. aS7 EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 16 to Street Lighting Maintenance 01strict 6; Assess. ho. of Lan s to be Annexed Project Acreare -WE— 38 L' 75 2£,000L ' 2.7,Wu[ CUP 87 -04 pcl 2 .60 1.2 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- pcl 3 1.95 3.9 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- pcl 4 1.29 2_6 = _ _ 3.84 7.7 - -- - -- - -- - -- --- OR 86 -32 (lot 5, TR 12176) _50 1_2 _ 3 TOTAL 4.43 8.9 - -- 3 - -- - -- - -- _ ass' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. /(o CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF RAN RIMNARDINO RTATZ OF CMMp.NIA - N m .. 4 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. & ANNEXATION NO. /&, r CITY 01 WC$O CUCA1[ONOA COUNTY OF BAN BWARDINO A �t5� BTATb OF CALSlORNIA CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING O COMER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HAVEN AVENUE TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 RECOMWNOATION: It is recommended that pity Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in Maintenance District No.�4 and approving the Engineer's Report. Lighting BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for C!cy Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 for Parcel Map 9504, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. The developer of the subject project has been notified of the public hearing by ®a!1. The attached resolution also app •oves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution ';0 83 -321. Respectfully fitted, Attachments RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION c NO. 0 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND i ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 9504 , WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the ' 18th day of May, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -322 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighcin; Maintenance District No. 4, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -322 was duly and legally putllshed in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown, by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Cierk, and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement ", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property ' proposea to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of intention No. 08 -322, according to the names and addresses of such owners as ! ene same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City ur Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly malted in the time, form, and dnner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Hailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral ana aocumentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdiction to order the propo.ed work. SECTION 1: it 1s hereby resolved by the City Council of the City_of Rancho Cucamonga hat the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, ant said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described In said Pesolution of Intention No. 88 -322, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a— SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's epor are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said trac s ave been occupied. - a�a CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District Yo. 4 Annexation No. 8 for Parcel Map 9504 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division if of the Streets and Mfghwa•s Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2, General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new tevelopments Into Street Lighting Maintenance District No, 4. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file w.th the City Engineer, Improvement maintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans ar ,)ecifications The plans and speoiflcations for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Div' .,r.. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development pi,. ,:nd the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district Include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. 02 ?3 9 2 Total. Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 1,701 Assessment Units this annex per pago 4 • 32 Total Assessment Units 1,732 3. Lust per Assessment Unit: Tat al Annual Maintenance Cost $54 208.32 • 531.30 /year /unit No. o n s n. s r ct —L /Je Assessment shall apply to each lot or percel as explained in Section 6, a9�z SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting Improvement f, construction. All improvements will be constructed by levelopers. Based 1 an available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment ¢, ' purposes will be as indicated 'below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 is comprised of street i$ light improvements on local streets for all residential and non- residential projects throughout the Terra Vista Vista Planned Community. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 is c shown below: ' 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost_:_ do of Lamps $ Lamps Annex Lanp Size* New Lamp YTO No. 8 Total 5800L 394 0 04 9500L 28 0 83 16,000L 5 0 5 22,000L 1 0 1 27,500L 2 0 2 •rligh Pressure Sodiun Vapor Total Total Annual Larp Size L_ amps Nate No's Maint. Cost 5800L 394 X S 6.93 X 12 $42,221.04 9500L 88 X $10.16 X 12 10,728.96 16,0001. 5 X $12.08 X 12 724.80 22,0001. 1 X $13.84 X 12 166.03 27,500 2 X $15.31 X 12 • 367.44 Total Annual Maint. Cost • $54,208.32 2 Total. Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 1,701 Assessment Units this annex per pago 4 • 32 Total Assessment Units 1,732 3. Lust per Assessment Unit: Tat al Annual Maintenance Cost $54 208.32 • 531.30 /year /unit No. o n s n. s r ct —L /Je Assessment shall apply to each lot or percel as explained in Section 6, a9�z 10 SEC.ICN S. Assessment OfMam Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled -Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 40, Annexation No. S. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to ba of specific benefit to all properties (residential and non - residential) withi•s the District in accordance with the following relationship: Single family residential prcjectst 1 Dwelling Unit • 1 Assess, Unit Multi family resideatfsl projects: 1 DmIling Unit .0i As:tss. Unit Non - residential projects: 1.0 acre • 2.0 Asses, Units SECTION '. Order of Events 1. City Council z4opts Resolution of Preliminary Approl,al of City Engineers Report. 2. City Council adorts Resolutlon of Intention to annex at District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abarden 'he p!oceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council S. Every yea: in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and appro +es, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. A4 , ..i .'i l �l EXHICIT "A r Properties and Improvements to be included within, Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 4: i Y, Assess. No. cf Lap to be Annexed Project Acreage iii- 3H�9mV1C-- Traw -22Z Z/,,30dC PM 9504 pcl 1 .83 1.6 - -_ _ -_ - -- _ -_ --- . Pcl 2 .48 .9 __- _._ - -_ - -- --- pcl 3 2.64 5.3 - -_ -__ - -- ___ --- ,a pcl 4 .62 1.2 - -- - -- -- -- -° pcl 5 2.38 4.8 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- pcl 6 4.27 e.5 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- pct 7 .91 1.0 -- - -- - -- - -- - -- pcl 8 1.02 2.0 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- pcl 9 .64 1.2 - -- __- .__ ___ --- PC] 10 .48 1.0 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- Pcl 11 _87 1.7 TOTAL 15.95 32.0 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- (Note: Street lights for this project were previously annexed to the District per Annexation No. 6.) Otl / v ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.4 ANW"TION NO.. _ VALENCIA Je 5 I ru • z E • TERRA VISTA VILLAGE • > P.M. 9504 z w m > BASE LINE ROAD • SBOO LwsnS W f11 Al 0 ;^ crrY OF RANCHO cuc"ONGA ,yy WUNTY OF SAN BERNmwn;O I �. _ t: STAVE OF CAU OBCI�tIA m N — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAfONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Aaministrative Services Director BY: Elizabeth Stnddard, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: PRELIMIMARY BUDGET 1988/89 RECOWEMDATIOM: Open the Public Hearing, receive public input and provide any additional direction to staff to finalize the 1980/89 City Budget. BACKGROUND: On May 25, 1908, and June 13, 1388, public Council /staff budget workshops were held. The preliminary budget, as a result of the two workshops, is outlined below: Budget Category Proposed Expenditures In General Fund Special and Restricted Funds Administration $ 988,033 Administrative Services $ 920,345 City Facilities $ 948,954 Overhead $ 878,231 Community Development S 5,849,179 Capital Projects S 4,429,471 Streets d Park Maintenance $ 4,153,127 Community Services $ 1.173,763 Special Funds f 22,120,386 Special Assessment Districts $ 1,724,413 Sheriff's S 6,122,988 Proprietary Funds i 1,430,509 Agency Funds 4 131 123 4 ;8- 700—,522 RespGC Lfully submitted. Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH:ES:cv i I CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAhTONGA STAFF REPORT DATE* June 15, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL. TO DESIGNATE THE LORD NWSE 6797 HELLMAN AVENUE. RANCHD CUCARffl9X._X RTC I. RECOWENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends TFa_F_fFe7T57CouncfI designate the Lord House a landmark with the adoption of the attached Resolution. II. BACKGROUND: This house, identified as a potesitial landmark on the T987- 111'sioric Resources Inventory, was built by Isaac M. Lard in 1585. Isaac Lord was a person of importance in the region. He founded the City of La Verne (originally Lordsburg), was Wtrumental in routing the Santa Fe Railroad through Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Lordsburg, served as a member of the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors in the early 1890's, and to Los Angeles was the first Chatrman of the Board of Trade. The house was later owned by the Dztes, a locally well -known family. It is a hipped -roof Folk Victorian house with board -and- batten siding surrounded by heavy vegetation. It may be the oldest house In Alta Lama still standing an its original site. III. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ACTION: A public hearing was held on liay 5, 1988 at which the ssion passed a Resolution ommending designation of the Lord House. The Caamisslon "'- specified that the recommendation was for the house and not for the garage or sheds. BB:AB:te Attachments: Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report of liay S. 1988 Letter to Ms. Mae Elder, Owner May S. 1988 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes x9? — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: may 5, 1988 TO. Chairman and Members or the Historic Preservation Coimaission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 6797 HELLMAN AVENUE RANCHO se propo o es gna e e LON House, man venue, a Historic Landmark - APN: 202- O51 -12. I. SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The house is located on a 4.7 acre parcel on the eas s e of Hallman Avenue, 332 feet south of I9th Street. It is set back considerably from Hellman. B. Site Land Uses - Zoning_-_ General Plan Designation: The site is a s ng a am y Ouse on a T.7 acre lo}. It Is zoned Low Density Residential (24 dwelling units per acre) avid has a Low Density Residential designation on the General Plan. C. Surroundin Land Use - Zonin - General Plan Desi nation: r - Vacant; "on 'n' an nere an s gna ons are Low Density Restdential. South - Vacant; Zoning and General Plan Designations are Low Density Residential. East - Vacant; Zoning and General Plan Designations are Low Density Residential. Nest - Single family houses; Zoning and General Plan Designations are Low Density Residential. D Des�crip_Lion: The site 1s lushly landscaped with a variety of ma tu e rirees that set the property off from the surrounding area. It adds to the rural ambiance of Hellman as a country road lined with heavy vegetation. The house itself is barely visible from the street. Reamants of an orange grove and other fruit trees fill the deep front setback. An enormous deodar cedar rises in front, in addition to a few Eucaipytus and a dozen tall Palm trees. There is a circular gravel driveway, one side of which extends along the side of the house. M. UPC STAFF REPORT RE: LORD HOUSE May S 1988 Page 2 The house !Dpears to need some repair and restoration but maintains the appearance of a Victorian farm house classified as Folk Victorian. It is covered with board and batten siding and has a combination simple hipped roof ever the major portion of the house and a pyramidal hipped section. Turned porch Posts edge the porches which are on three sides of the front section of the house. II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: This house came to our attention when a reactor ca e a out the property and the potential for marketing the site for a future subdivision. It is on the list of potential historic sites. A picture of the house and references to the families who built it and lived in it are in The History of Alta Loma, California 1880 -1980. The house may be the oldest still standing to the Alta Loma community, having been built in 1885. Its builder, Isaac N. Lord, and his wife, Julia, bought the property from a Mr. Wilcox. Hr. and Mrs. Lord's house actually was a Large addition to a tiny bungalow W. Wilcox had lived in. An 1894 news article cited in L1 ht Over The Mountain said, 'Supervisor I.N. Lord has one o e most cus houses :n the settlement. A broad gallery extends around three sides of the building; this, with the umbrajeous shade, presents a most inviting appearance.' (Page 58) Isaac Lord was among those wh had influenced the railroad's decision to build a line between San Bernardino and Los Angeles by way Of Cucamonga and Pasadena and what is now LaYerne. According to Mrs. Evelyn Hollinger, a local historian who is writing a history of La Verne, Isaac Lord boug9ht land In what later became LaYern. and constructed a hotel in 1887. It was blown over in t.'e great wind of December 10, 1887 and rebuilt. Meanwhi•:, according to the History of Alta Lama, California 1880 -1980 , several members of me urc o re rem a e e mid -west and formed a small colony called Eswana (in whbt is now the Alta Loma area) after its three founders, Eshelman, Wells and Nair. They were looking for a site for a Brethren College, and when the boom of 1807 became a bust, they bought an option for Isaac Lord's hotel in 1889. Mrs. Hollinger said that the town was named Lordsburg in an agreement Isaac Lord made with the Santa Fe Railroad. Over the next few years, the Brethren moved to Lordsburg. The Brethren wanted to change the name of the town, but were prevented from this for a number of years because of the agreement between Lord and the Santa Fe. A large number of Brethren took advantage of the cheap fares from the mid -west to California and settled In what is now called the town of La Verne. HPC STAFF REPORT RE: LORD HOUSE MAY S. 1988 Page 3 8. Isaac Lord was a man of influence not only in Laverne and Alta Loma iiamnsa at that time), he was on the County Board of Supervisors during his time In San Bernardino County and in Los Angeles was the first Chairman of the Board of Trade, according to Mrs. Hollinger. An article from the Ontario Record of October 8, 1890, referred to him as the 'fa a ran orty delegate from Cucamonga' Other articles referred to him as genial, shrewd and capable and said he would make a good supervisor. Mother owner of the property, the Oztewanowskis family, called Dzie, was a well -known local family. According to the H1sto of Alta Lama California 1880 -1980, they purchased the proper n er z ei—`s father had been a Polish count who immigrated to Wisconsin. Gilbert and his wife. Mary, moved from Wisconsin to Woonsocket, South Dakota, and later to Alta Loma Edward with children. ThecK3rshallsslived In an apartment in the house wnere they stayed for varying periods of time over the years. The Dzies participated in local social life and had manly friends. Most of the ranch was sold after Gilbert Me died in 1927 and the last 5 acres was let go for taxes in 1935. recognition and designation as a 1 oldest house standing on its orig1 community, and 2) it was built by importance, Isaac W. Lord. Furthe existing Victorian structures in assoclated with other well -known to the Marshalls. The overall site wi are worthy of mention in themselves. house has two outstanding notewor candidate for deark: 1 It may be the rl site in the Alta Loma person of great regional ore, it is among the few lancho Cucamonga and 1s 1 families, the Dzies and its impressive plantings C. Issues The landmark designation should include the associated Tduapin9. Possible subdivision of this property needs to take into consideration the historically valuable house, and the mature landscaping around ic. D Envtronmentai Assessment: Designation of a landmark 1s exempt ram re, remen s title 19. Section 15308). ill. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Criteria in the Ordinance that staff thinks are app ca a are as follows: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 3M? HPC STAFF REPORT RE: LORD HOUSE May 5, 1988 Page a 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. 4. The proposed landmark was connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, comunity, and city. IV. CORRESPONDEUCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n ne a eport newspaper, and notices sent to property owners wrtFi%�ee . e property owner and Mr. Mal Unru h, realter, have been sent an explanatory letter and a copy of this report. Staff has talked about Isaac Lord to Mrs. Evelyn Hollinger, La Verne historian. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation sF=W son re omend to the City Council that they adopt a Resolution designating the Lord House and its site a Historic Landmark because It meets the criteria es- .olished in the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Such designation is in conformance with the Rancho Cucamonga General Min. Respectfully submitted, Lamer Henderson n �- Senior Planner LH:AB :ko Attachments: Letter to Hs. Elder Site Location Map Picture from History of Alta Loma 1880 -1980 Resolution ML • City of Rancho Cucaaenja , Application for HISTORIC NNDRARx DRRIGNMON HISTORIC POINT Or INTEREST DESIGNATION r1 _b_listoric Gammark Sistorlc point of Interest tDiRTf?ICATION 1. Caaaon its z. Historic Name. it knowos S. Street or Rural Adiresn_ 6797 Neuman r CSty1_ etnch Cuctwpnpt zips 91701 Coustyt. S15. Aaeanaor•e parcel Nn. Ip2- 061 -12 Zones for fetal Deseriptloas e. Present owner, if knoat Nas Elder Addruu 67x7 Neliwn City$ Ranch •ca •ro• Zips 91701 Ownership Im Public pridat-*= 0. Present ant Resfdenrs OrigiRM2 Oses 2- fl 4 ye Other past One, DESCRIPTION d. Briefly describe the preaeat ph 1 a ,areas of t" site or structure and describe say War • era one cram its original Conditions A folk, y1tN fe t surd vfth h1coM roof pir the wt portion and m Pyramidal hipped roof o..r a smaller Do tlon T man pout IUDPOrt each of the three porch,. The house is covered with board and batten sldio9. T. Location skstcb map (drew a label B. APPmxi=-e property size[ site and surrounding street,, road), and prominent ludmrks)s Lot Size (in feet) Proatage-321xv Depth y ?1•V or approx. acreage 9. Condition$ (chock one) A. Exesilest__ p, fgodj_ e. ?air_ d. Deteriorated_ s. Mc, longer in existence_ 10. Is the futnret A. Alteredl�o b. DsaltersCl Window Change 11. Surroundings$ (check more tht use it necessary) a. Open land b. Residential_cX c. Scattersd buildings_ d. Densely built -up__ 12. Threats to site, A. None kaowd_ b. Private develop"nt_ t c. Zoning__ A. Public Starke Project__ a. gradalisim f. Other 13. Dates of enclosed photograph(a) 1988 r• NO7gt The folvosing (Ise" 14-10) are for structures only. 14. Primary exterior building "terlalt a. since Brick e. Stucco— d Adobe Stood 1 f. Other -- 10. Is the structural a. 00 its original sitsl f b. Votvdt o. Itaknn"? is. Year of ta1t1AI Coastructlom, Ise$ This late Ism a. Tactual b. gagaated 1 17. Architect (if kaowa)s Is. Builder (1f kaoma), Is. Related reaturess a. Sams b. C!"Siage house • c. Outbouw d. sbed(s) V_ e. ynratal Oardes(s) f. lladelll_ t. Staurtower /tankhouse IS Other 1. Rosa Thick, ature landscaPing Including a cull orange prose. UGHI ICANCIC 20. Briefly state historical maid /or arc Itecturat Importance (include data. vests. And person "eociated with the site \-ten knom)t Built hr 11esC Lord, founder of lordsba' (City of Warns) and Influential Politician. nesber or Board of Superrison in 1890'. Alsoo hate of Orin and earshall Dallies. Nq be oldest hoar in A!ta Loa community. 11. Bain the" of the historic resources g4m3mlkap'rxmmlt a. Architecture i b. Arts h Letsurs n. Econom)c/lodu rill d. Government •1 e Exploration /settlecent t I. Military E Religion b. soclll /Educatlon ZZ sources List books, doeueeots, surreys psreonal Interviews add their date,, nistorr of Alta Loa. IYaI( /droll. IS80.19t0 hr a tic State eGl. Lt ht 0nr tht Rcuntafni, Revised Ed.. Py Darald Cluns none cancer r 20 Data tore press arad --,UAL-12U— By �(name)sm.. a•nls Addnut__ Clgl Zlpl_, Phnnet -- Oraanlrattont_ City of Rancho Cucuonoa CITY OF RANCED CL;CAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION rnAf UTQQrn%f rmr, Tnu, Lod HLWX -- EXH[Wr SCALE _ 3oG CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA rnu ak. m..m a."dw �urs.w.y uw+.w,vn mow.lnl April 20, 1988 Hoe Elder 6797 Hellman Rancho Crcamonga, California 91701 Dear Ms. Elder: As the staff person working with the Historic Preservation Commission in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, I was recently called by W. Hal Unruh, a realtor who wanted to know about the historic aspects of your property. I found that Your home was included on a list or Potential historic sites and it documented as a pia-^ of iaaortance in the History of Alta Lama, California 1880 -1980. The City undertook w survey of its historic resources in 1987 in order to document the structures, sites, landscapes, and districts that are of historic, architectural, cultural or engineering interest. It is the City's goal to preserve, protect and enhance its historic resources as mucn as possihle, since there is so such that is new and so little that remains from earlier times. The heritage of MY communitfes of Rancho Cucamonga is important tc the City's image and identity, and your hose, which is of great historic value, Is an important part of that heritage. On May S. 1982, the Historic Preservation Commission will be conducting a public hearing to consider the designation of your home as a historic landmark. You will receive a copy of the staff report and, of course, you are invited to speak to the Commission or to write to them on the matter. The main consequence of being a historic landmark is that material changes to the exterior of the structure and to the site are reviewed by the Commission. The property would also be listed In the City's booklet, 'Historic Landmarks and Points of Interest'. To help owners of historic properties, there is a provision in the Development Code that allows historic residences to be converted to other uses with a Conditional Use Permit and review by the W stork Preservation Commission. As City staff, we feel a sense of respect for our City's historic buildfngs and places, and we desire to be of service to owners of these properties. There are many thousands of homes throughout California a4d the nation that are designated as landmarks. Our experience is that such recognitivr-l" point of pride and often means enhanced property values rather than a problem. The City intends to work in a cooperative spirit with owners of landmarks in the event that they wish to alter the exterior of their buildings by Providing technical advice on proper construction materials and processes in order to protect the structure's historic value. n "" ih.tlryJ Buquvl ll r�m,i,l Nn,nl Dunn %I Hnv+nvn LETTER TO: MAE ELOER� ,x RE: Historic Designation April 20, 1988 Page 2 �a j If you have any Questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 999 -1861, ext. 295. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARIMEMT PLANNING DIVISION Arlene Banks ;ssaciate Planner AB:ko CL Unruh, G.H. Dobbs A Associates ( Bra.. Fuller, City Planner Larry Hcoderson, Senior Planner Historic Preservation Comission loni IlewJt 4'M14A1,111 I 1. Jo -.w.e. Gvj Ai.-t.,. la - K6 A Dream Come Trues -- 100 Years Later Isaac Lord never saw his boom-town make good hoar IV. Lord Ives the r ,n,tk pro. motor rah, ceavlacod the Atchison, rortid b yaata it to barld its ibis hishuay throesk cats.. Iaan of Lwdrbs+,x 5rc.dty Pocp, N�ttonal Ranh Cu/btnoeR A Abin Library U rI,a1 50 by Charlie Bashalu Photogmyhy by Marra Gotanles sion out The f ' s fabled ZI mom' ns was San Gaabrkl sax lad would be proud of, Archangel, founded In r71. Iw thou. In a !hurt time Mission San Although Lml'. dream Gabriers fertil, lands were covered mcreateawhts9r,,tptLmr, owed will' acres of orchard! and gapes, Lorilsburg (row la tk,ne) solid r�0 and fields of grain and livestock But years " hee take pride sr know- despite this agricultural success• the in4 that today a beautiful Arid pass. prmua Comalurrty has bixsomed mWkm relied heavily on hlextcds bum the seed of that dream. sirp?lief to survhe lvmg delays in delnering supplies San Diego), art not the first to caB thb (via soon prompted an expoditior W 'uuf bwutifuf vaBry 'home,' Cur roots a more daces• Wand route from stretch Into the past Bwk as much Sonora, Mea m as $frT) years. Do an arYlerlt time Of The cipechtkldf lead" wif Iuari prehlsrork indianv who were called Bautista de Anna. Along the wav, his Gab ieBnof by th c.vrrish. Several srtu0 (;abnclarn party camped at Arroyo de Ios Ours set- tkmenb extned along the fo hrBs Grow San Antonio Creek) and pas. std through La \Moe m March V74 between the San Gabric! "VAcy and ttinh INs raw route from M". Sur BerrunlLSn One village was ico firmly establish,' s second ea• located at hfud Spri:w v what Is now the Cornier of Arrow ffighway fvdnknr arched the rudovurg year %Vdh and Sr r Dim.rs Canyon Road d were 240 Spanish sMtiea and a hike amount d cattle. These families 'here Inducts Bawd easily oft lh, and bvestock formed the very bounty of the rich land They wen-, nuclear of the future gw, oh and h,.•itm and gatherers, pnmanly sal• culture of our area leamg acoua and tw, rig inull In Noember 1826 the mrs&,n game The fveaceful Gabrielum led an welcomed Its first American w,tors —a hand of mountain men ixiated and simple existence for led by k"uh Strong Smith On mane if arsanrri of )can rhnr r"t brief encounter with the ouUNe two ixY"I os Smith's party amppccdd A Mud Srrinrrggas.. Unvnningly, then world came in DM when an aped!- Ira cis esrabiafed a path through V turn from San D I led by Can W+ de A"*da lira$I+Ifds tone which evemually became the Wssed valley ennnrte to San Frannm link b1meen America and Alta Cald.rnlas mksarnf and puirh o When word from Psrrola This path later became known n Be reached inimiscan Father )unfpem Upper San Semanhnu Road. Serra. eager plans were mate to UnW XK the San Qbdel Mis- civdue and Chrultan¢e the hicndly Indans Mon was the principal enterprim and Soso, bonds of urdK,s and ma, domnani ttnn=K fore, for this regain But s"uLnr ^V that year sronarkf Kmtured noreh frum San Dregq colonizing the new land of stopped the pt werf: misiw-, of its Lino which was Iher. dr IJ d into Alta Caldomia v01hbPn rf rots- na.Kh S std green 0 grants to Spanish setthms. In early 1gT/, 1'bmacio Phkrnuues V d and Rr-Wo Wjar received a 22M acre leant called Rarrho San Jose. which comprised virtually an rl namons thtley they wm nully split the land, with Palomva taking th- northern half. Paloman-s'rust hc.ae (Casa de Pdnsera) stW stands at the corner of McKinley and Park Avenues in (boson. Thee )can later a Land grant vvaagr vvn hr Palomar& b"Irmin- law, lab Anew. Hb parcel was on the northwest side of U:a valley ad. facent to Rancho San )ose. In the foOrnving decade the vagey changed very Lttie. Gm the war bmvxn life dos and Use United States (Ig &IM) had little direct cf. fect on focal operations. But soon afterward all attention focused north to the Maher fade. The rush for gold brought letu of thousands of .ice 7ht most dominant economic and caftmal Influenrt in this valley coos the Murton San Cabrlel, rstablbhed in 1771 by Spanish mlWo..Nec. of the kcal cattle barons were faced to divide end sell their ranches to newcomers. With wisdoa, most of the new semkr from the east await- ed cattle ranching. Instead they of Arrow Highway and Orange Grove Avenue, Ibmona) The adobe included a small room for a store and acted as a stage stop. Through a variety of occu- Stapgenng under huge debts iti tuned dunng tlse boom )tan, many fordsbwj's Grand hotel Gas typal of the boom.toum ma rsbblishments It ntw haa piymaraunstt. ha ever, and rns drtdtd to the ollep. rrcruau orb 51 Ikn a believed to be M fint th onle hate d fir Atchbon, lblvla b Sawa Fe railroads /rers• San Wmardiw to fes Aortas on .,fay ffi ZW The hard ills, typwal of lad aucxals ervisnn halos oprroffa; at that fmn4d tiare. fGC !sore rhafq W. A Afyns collechonl stores, ovci blasksmmhs, a hotel and str 1, w did the dependence upon the and the cow of Lordsburg saloon It was a feu pr shi ping for served as A rrllmad monopoly The cocky Southern Pacific exam became greedy Twv important factors preceded the land boom and the Insaskm of center pprxduce artd rest stop far the Butterfield Stage. and started chArgirg high rates. fur immigrants the developrrrnt of a I'lull vvu considered the patriarch taampie. the freight durgn bcrveen dependable and adequate water d the va0ey Ile had at vakwu; fur lm Angeles and Colin were the supply and the start of a profitable m growth and dive lnert same As benveen tics Angeles and antis industry The Upper San Bemardiru Road Cheragev In general. passenger sir, in the early IOBM. Geocge Chaf- also attracted soften. though it was van was dismal and W'w high priced fey successfully developed a water A less traveled trade torte than the Although Soulhem Pxdk was sue- supply system from the San Gabriel road through 5padra ceswid in sidling competition for Mountains that could sustaln the One of the most significant sevrral yeah, Its greediness would valleys rapid population grxwth and events in the history of the United eve itually lead to the ielmmmg of pontering crew industry States. the completion of the tau Santa Fe Radroad a land boom Although the San Gabriel Mw transcontinen W radmad in 1069 Also l or had grown mange, here as ear - had a ordound vnpact on the ty As 1803, its groves were not the development of the valley COLONIST TICKETS true predecrssors of the local in. Ritrm A fa. lean aft" the dustry UnN about 187TI the citrus i;,ldcnspTke..asxmven the South growr, here were poor in quality, be em I'xde: I:e•inwd Logan to build a I ne thmuAll ypadra mnwing lm TO CALIFORNIA ing desmbed as `thick skinned pithy. sou and drl- The wtkmkim- yngrt•s and 4t,vv Orleans Phdlips pried stgrid"idly, herwevec with Tn,t uneial farsighted real estate pro the introduction of new vanvices and icr, rvred the mcm3sed (love of ■ :Ya:tal' 7-[•t:A t►�1' better seed stock . �ghr traifr Through the valley and In the to.inning lemons were . he, b -gan r, dnmjm,a A valley full �v,� „�„ u� the none popular crop Thsy shipped m pivple By wjitabnv, the in aAhle the, ,•vpvrhd h,.ash rt,m �� vq na ., �,� better and offend A year -round harvest It was the introduction d rat estate sales L nfununatel, the real estate THE GREATEST OPPOMNITT the . tang, to the WMs. though that lurked off the industry boom By twm did nor begin untd o years T"^"i— the 1950s the orange had bmrne later in 109in Appppar"th• nampcbton HOMES IN CALIFORNIA Caldomlas roost lucrative export tMween tor» radnw1, was ^nded m _ - ,lire gold More than 123 m lhun that lime foster hvam '- citnis trcef one prdng A: Since the Snwhem Isxda was The ,amprhxon for rwretyaaf trade u i nl Ire only motor radnuJ m thou state LSOUT'HIERN PACIFIC CBMPAgI' beruven the radretd, reduced the Tb p(T.Yr oaf virtually uidimited in i last of A tvnhboad beset from ' ddw And as this air. gmv in _J 517s ea, at one rune only III In t„wm171 CJldumu bnngmg u tens n' mJLuna of dollars annualls In 1.1 11anr a hl Jllh, I`lend n v,rul tl pea •.I .ranges anJ lynxm- ,•rn• han,.hJ Af 11•,11 nwnd In I!G"' •hr arras madly ap,meJ Jo,m-1nl-1Ih ,,hen the hmt oranges I.ere glc,s,afu % ah.pp,dIt. 1h, E", M "'I The Iran -1141 a.ted as an nJ,rn.w•mem allrJ,hnglhoutmds •I ,. dJ „non mL„n:nmtl In the tun. ,hme IL,.A„u, h a, l h-1rlrs \,nd h.,ns lent•...... s. fl.alrp it 'III . a10 R "Oh. and 11111.. If."? Lh Aam, R,,,, LSWI .•� 11111,11 mt,,,r 1, d,•,, nh.ng the mm,.rt,•ur mdJ hmah•anJ nmr NO I ' V 'an l'aP d .n• h..n,er Ihv..mm�g f nod ervu rr[ lurmnl nHrKmhnnr In r^m6rK f In qJ !n C• prurnsrmp n/ a., .� m.l reds •nil n. thl• laC„ that rrhu• r nrry lhu Imprnl nl pra.lurMl rry nn,l sal rvl rhr Imul mAusby Irnm 'I:vAed the I IIIJ hs•m In tune I1,95 l Jhh•rnl,, ,h. t,.nt-1 le ILuIn,ld, nit nd l alJ• r ttdl ...me hnl.nlana apc•, u1m.. rh,• lumed nut n Lv [Oh,' mitre than the n.. r \ndh• I hll,W, Jy. r,„ .,as a mutual Jr h,n Ju Ind unldled hop, .d their ,.a ,A no .. 1 ....... r. . .m 11 Iagctment h•t ,,,, the raJnw, J. a •s.pnvd e, pn, m. m•n 'a, II,,uu.A nt u a e it'. a-1le m uln.aJ.namd L,nJ IL.J 1., rdahun; g ^I rta ..emit In,n• h h lv ...,I Ih, •ail k, ulhnml .hhn l,ldh n lea m. m• IhJn qla. p ` ire TM, pin.maer IS,Jt l\ Turd rJ.l a .. ' lI Ihr hn, b, Art 1 a, h 'Jdn'JJ It,. Ahhough lsrtdshurg elentuall •L. k, ..el r, I...b, \ o ,, .. ,xfered a I,rrd •erlwa n,l,r ,nhPong n„ d,s-1pp,ired as -1 nom, rt mm.untd V "• r 1 °'1 as a hn,,, .,dop1n,, rt< nel, name J „I ,h „111. ., nh a Afs�numn h• Jpph nr� t Irnm a nr.ghh'r In in unua,,,,l nu, I m n, rl,'•, , ,. b•J •rr ynnt n n, and nn' par nagr n .,,,. eca 6nlurc and late I4•" .r ., ,rn aaJ ,,.and land need, In\eme.a ,er m.Jh m,ttum,l . ..1. ..1 „I,f , .,, r..l 1• n •♦ "t alT,ulrur,.l dn, apn ail ,,. r. ml.•,V.,,n I., \rme ,a1 ,t.NsahN 11 J. .. . r' ,.,gee _rtdera nn• !h. mh, , Ifs: 1, a,u rd pr .,mrnl lannrn l'n r ,r.Lf ��. n n, ^, um,on , n, Iudln• la „IS 11 6 ant, haN . t . .1 a • ,,. q•er Aod In, ithanlrr Jail 4„L.men (,alga l \nh 1, •rg. ., a. 1i 1,. '1 rt. .. n.p, mil LVmmq n 4an!.1A•aun`nnCnpmm1wM rail . • ,•• ' I nl .aernl 1. na m Ihn Ilnl Ilu.vgh th, rx,rth,•m part..1 the i1 •• , u.'r an•. „em h .n lunng'he hy.m M,n .1 the lalh, these L,mnvn cf • loped the .• . •. I.In ••44 \ a^ w, h ,M l nn a •,. • ° ` mn,unlY ul 1., 1t•me n1A had J e l ..,1.•,.nr I`n,.nun a •,J pn Jnr I4,`1 •Pita• nrl „paper and Q n,.,m n n,• .x. m•r• nt I v.1 harm hn,n eagerneaa ',r ..r Y. r/' I .' ..nmr n, .,.. ,v , 14. obit him t r,q•r.urrA nnehfrn nit ,nlnl I'm,, n/ r• r.,r..., an (..n,.. Is P-1 , ueer u bdy /n to .ash rhr . .r r rlJn, I .:.., , lru„ .Ib,n [' rnJun re N, L I �j 1 s 1[A\[ _II IV ILI \[ 54 the la lira pro"Mrs a, - I awaued the: radroad But Santa changed Its Plans and bun the 1' a fry mild m the south, through LO•dsburg I-x L=e was the man w ourtsd the Santa k aim euabiul a local lox. km u may have been ho connection with the powerful railroad rn,in rOab P HunBngbn (by mama to Huntmngt ) was the mding fad fortSanta Fe itb sluft act route through L, :9 and not L+ %me Lord and the San- n Fe paned forces to create a dttyy which would rival Southern radru's fbmona as a Population center A Ii I blitz of local newspaper :,de pro. mated a land auction on kLy 25, FOR MORE INFORALVTON ABOUT L A VFRNE HISTORY IThis artxlc presents orgy a brie( ovennew of La knees hestmy Several interesting books me available which provide many detailed and e,,d amounts ,wilt the histtuy r our dry and the dm=p rent of Southem CalrF.srrda These am available in the La %thus, City Lbrary. the Uruvenity, of La Vvne Library and in the Spenzi Cogent - section of the Ibmona public library Item ate a few books Ile recommend LDniibup • A Norman �Ramseya, • Lot *Me f cl m �rnryrr lry Claddys E Muir a I The tmtaSv Ymn. Our ULVy Belbm INA by Wdham F king • Hobry d Raman tbifey Caftbmm. by F P Bracket I • CalrImrm —a Barrlfetrud HWom by Davis Lander ' Whirto —Tux, Centuno d Alan Uhl and Gmueh by W H Hutchins • Cdlbmm Lard of Cmtrsr. by David W Units • Los Mtelet. Badnphy Oi d C 8t ryfohn and LeRce • Plus mv-W historical sketches prepared by V Ird \t re+s resident ha, tanan• W,, which was billed as th Fgraraest sale Of the yea 'he Throe auchoneen raptued th btrslncss ot the 2588 pople on br the Mot 7hcse people wem le: ho rkd Out one San'1 Fe trains from ndn FAersidC[Sn &7 nardino and Inv Ar,t,,lcy yeas. those taking the SOuthern Pacific to n mood, free arriage rides were pro vded to Vie auction site Bran bands. 'p•ue artMian wateC a fre lunch wrd more kept the land soekrn entertaind " cost bet, Meth re70p and SM exh, and about $200 B worth •d lard was sold m one' day Building started immediatelafter the auction The post ofgo" and most of hie homes were built south d the railroad traclx Laud and others also imested heavily in a luxurious threesmry hotel By the fall rf 1Be7lordsburg w•as begin" to have the look cf a boom town But when the dust and eMtement had dial down, R became aPPrarer that all was cwt well Lordsburg lacked e and height agent' AfcDomugh mr- Laded Mathew M+yf Eshelmn, a e minuter of the Church of the hand Brefhmn, to come b Lrd Wq as an agent of the railroad Eshelman eactusrbn became convinced that the would be Ideal for a colorry for Brethren. Uwlmm set out in camto woo his fellows fur the propocorny At the expense of tlse Santa Fe. he edited, printed and nailed a vmWY newsp+pe[ the Southern Calibmmn, to Brethren in the East The location and climate desMbed In glowing terms. The March 4 IM Suuthrm Cahfomun carried an ad Werth ;A free nde from any point east of the Rocky Mountains to CldrLY. to � lane_ buying STAB worth of proper. Thee 7dlaann to sale L rdbug worked The (_!lurch of the Brethren was formally established m Lords burg on NOV. 1, 18911 By JIM there were sot mimden and apphnbrate ly EO members. Ilrrhaps the pmmphng of the Lordsbog CoRiae arldfnafly occupied br mple boorr.touw haft!. As fir arena arw Sm..d teas brakm f eoplpl It seems th t the mayority of l for Foaadm flail m 19tat e mate spemlaton or e "ai estate promoters, or m enhepreneun e eduw e Land value dropped +nil B pmouse seven! ot the new worthless The hotel never I In Lodsbu.,.g The school occupied was t o t the empty Lnrdsbulg Hotet Literal, tin¢ec nu 4 Professional ml- P"PeT,Thusetthegmundv "kfur �✓ a'Passenicer an Industry that would prmper fur .suxher 64 years in L, Verne. In the 1890. more changes mid aripro ements within the atrus in- iustry provided a tTt spot for an xherwbe diffic decade atnu prices remained high untd 1898 But then the local economy t*W to dwindle A senes of drwghn and a decline in the tourist bitsmess rook thew toll And shippm and parkin began ro Lice advantage d the gmweto by Paying lovwer men. Tb mmW t the art» d the'mid• dlemari who threatened their very existence, the growers otganired associations designed to meet the Eastern buyers with a united and profitable marketing armngemant. R Rcombined their ptsza• Tey weighed, graded sirr ped their xasoAs out d one packing that vests pnvwtasly daah growers. These associations stressed quality to but " and bean to use special brand names to datmgunh their products This gave birth to the umate and mlorful padAng labels treasured today by r.uny collectors. They had wistful names —Pansy, Begona, Pride of La %km end dravvmgs depicting a sunny Calffor• no utopia The labels s..:d the fruits ai well as the towns When winter vhanged the Eastemeri "add to "hire, Thousands saw the [abets and dreamed of Cahlornu Each year a few mart Eascemen abandoned the cold and Bed to LA Mmne The La 1Fme Growers Assoca- twn was established in 1909 Within five years the output of the associa- tions pxkrng house increased ham to 625 ram carloads By 1919 the output increased to 1.200. roads. That sear the orange and lemon grinwen untied to form the La *me Fran Euhange which eventua0y Kxjme a member of the CAdomu Frud Gowen E,change(Surabt) In the Ia20s and 30s Ls Wme was km.n as the 'I4 an of the Orange Empire- In N2: mum than $2 2 mdfon of fruit was sold by local gmwrn In the ksc u mtru : m hutry s hey - dav in the mid 1914%, four picking h Nan vwrrc toning full boom in LA Wine shipping more than 2000 Wtkmd, id fruit annuJll% But the pmnpenty of the "for. mg mdustry was also the Cause d its decline By the 19WOs the older groves had robbed the soil of Its lifegiving qualities Trees were getting old and fruit was degrading in quality, A deadly disease known as 'Quxk Decline swept through the valley Rather than replant, many gpoov�vq%sold their dedmLlg groves to Utd developers As the housing In• dustry boomed, t1e Inflated price of land pressured even the strongest holdnrb to se4 tooling an era d to me % that wig nner be forgd tern . AS the vary grew over the decades with Immigrants from the Eve these newcomers demanded the services and amenities they were accustomed to 'back Mme" The mark of true progress for most early 1ue5tem towns, carne with the establishment d In local bank. The First National Wide of Lordbiug was founded in 1909 and the Farmers and Merchants of Ice \bane ut 1916 (They merged in 1911 to form the Ist National Batik of V Vkrme. In 1902 lice Iomona Valley Telephone and Telegraph Ca was established connecting IordsbuB with Pomona, Clarcnnnt and La Wrne. The fast directory, Issued in September 19M shows only four telephones in Lomisbung. But within a year the number climbed to more than 48 In 1929 the company was consolidated Into AT & T. The most rapid devulopment of Les Wtme was tied directly into the progress of electrical service. Flectrkl- ty played an important role in the nilbwtion and packing of emit Elcc- trloty, was first provided in the IB90% by the San Antonio Light and Tower Co. Eventually service was taken over by Southern Ca)ifomia Edison In 1911 the city orgarued its first antuntrer fire depanmenr The equlpnxN aunscstrd d �uu raw hose cacti But a few yeah later a bored issue prwdtd funds for the ntys fast fire tnxk and station Lordsb rg (and La W me) has ex- penerced many interts:mg and positive changes over the years. TWO vin fm mark, 4 1911, "a a i rfromrd rhanar frum Lmdranrj'a handCravn hosr wtt ,3 /Y AlthwLh it was neve, a boom-town doting Gaac Imd s lifetime, our com- munity has fulfilled his Mytarold dream. THERE'S GOING TO BE A PARIYI To celebrate the Mh birthday of La kbmo the city's Center, nW Committee has planned several exciting activities for 1987. These include the sale of city barstm and memento dens. a dryw ide party and parade on hlay 75v special oth hlstorxal dbpLrys and eahbib. contests and activities for school-age children, a SKMK fun nut and much more! 'Vie created activities that will appeal to er ne in the com- munity^ says Ron My, co- chair of the CentenNal Com• mittee. Announcements for the activities will be made In the kcal newspapers throughout the yeas says DAey. i li 4r.op.•« &r µU5C.V.� (2 -21e The by Heidi Hubbs DA v PltotogluNlfy by Lynda Miller LORDSBURG** HER MAIDEN NAME 1 /TlonI Bea HutTmne m the OIJ Town fo That is whit was b played ayrd bya'mmb• orchestra at the mock wedding ceremony on Opt Z! 1917, a two idenmas peed hand, n msMmony Tte'mamagir was t .omfrtmarate the carne change of Laudsburg to use new• name La lime. T •s eccentnc but Very real cerem •n), took place In the audlto-jum of Ca %>•me Calkge The bndal couple was dressed in full, fm. coal attire The'lxnd. (L rdsiburg). carved a brniquet of wansm Nrnsurun and .vas 1ortriytd W local barber Oscar W Raley and the "germ' (U Wray) was a fail and quite thin W 5 Romick I ferry Nichols pr•.sided inre the marriage. and after the ceremony he psttd a yoke wen the couple Other wdeling attendants necruckd sner flower girls tans hldlen Lau arx! Alai Dum.ard, Lna and hfumm Sct A and Gladys anu Hues Snow Each gut recited a pre to celebrate the occasion A reception Immediately follmved complete mil, rake and purich Nosy you might he asking %ourself why cam this 'nurnagc nneswrVt Whal was the punt d changing the tm ns nartet st ages the people of L ordsburg simpi roamed a new wine Isaac W Lord came to this ama 1,1 Iola fle sanded two miles in" a seed "element called la \line that was dnided by the nn. It, laid Santa Fir Radnud line Laird wanted m cuabl.sh has nn. .n, near the Snuthem Pacific radwas Joe to an argument he had wnh a blwjre%s man ;Alm Sinithen, r,xdi; err their toer priced freight rues Mean. tide Lonf buds a laael on his properly and named It and the timse v after himself As n tumid our, the hut•I never Ionised a single guns Within Three %ran, Lord was forced to sell has hotel and his holdings in the mmmutsae because the In `rd -fm real estate .loom' nner riappened. This took p:ee during the same time he was, ntablbhing the town. T ie heel and EW tots were subscqucntly sold m men represent ing the Church eel the Br,njU The agreement stated that the min would turn the hotel uuo a maw and tonng members of their sect to the town In in lofdsburg College was opened In the meantime the Iwynspo pie were growing tired of the Mme -tardsb ig,' in the Dec. S 19M issue C4 the tordsburg-La Wrne Leader, the headline read, 'THIS 7OtVN NEEDS A NEW NAME' This was the first recorded Indication of the ewe to gunge the towns name But ,he Issue was mntinuaBy cawing serous consternation to residnb If W Green, publisher of the Lmd4wg fJ Wene Leaden, cited mr. such anecdote in his paper On his sway home one nvnrng the train conductor asked Given where he would be getting elf Green, under has breath, replied. "Lnrdsburg "The wiiduetm could not hea: him and asked him once again, ftxcmg a louder mpowe from (seen Once again Green answered This m. change was repeated four times The tram conductor Nursed out "Of. U'd'burg- linen was sir rmhuras wd M the name - Intdsbu•y' that scene that d,ry on. he %o%vrd to begin has quest to change the came of the town It srems many ouhide people vim Pilling fun at the strives rte nng to It as "keusburg' Indeed fur n hnan made up predurnmtely d German Baptist Brash -:n, there was :mat emlVrrat5menl en the.elaganew r .v inceawns tit Lwdsourg Some felt the hewn shouldn't M\ f wined after such a person as I 1 II Ia d. while cahers wire searching by a u t Identiy for the town and fall that a more di�u+guished wine would pun Ihern rm she rtup They signed That Iinete aaieady WWII land• %burg Nosy htezim on the same Sarw fe line, which wa, "using great cordwou n to defrveries d Wait and fmftht However, n took unhi May TIM fist the name change Idea to beco.ne a full-blown haue. In a May issue d the lordsburg -Le %me leader. Green wrote that residents, had bet submitting unsolidsed wen for the city, but that if-.- name V lkmw soemtd to be the fnmite, Meamyhile, Lardiburg College was attmYting to range its tame to 'Palrnera In a protean to the court, Lurdsburg College stated as -Invy carte different than those of the man hw wham the college was named Tlle'u prtuicm was subsequently denied by the cauttse I 1V Lord, Lying in the Los Art Vks area, lead about the persistent in! he paper and was outmraaggeedd. He wrote a kit- to lire Issrdsbufg•La Rinse Leader Thca letter and has per. weal campaign may well have been the reason why the colleges pehtwn was not granted The letter read as follwv� Dhrr Su /sea IV an alsrclrm thr Le Allah, ran seat I/re trusters y LydsN,.y CcelgT Irme isId. wd the mills to dwntr & niner b ltilmra Gy Inr (muse fire City n/ Lo f hung tins imrrrd after a am, t•ra u near m sym- sattry uoh hoe p"p r, and dsrcinvs tf Bee m1hyr if InuG Bin may Ira ;nmrral eI fuse If one true. Ibry air cufpne, Fir it yearn Ilrry lair ,p after eree m," They air morfmus MWXII to call Are a rare ueulr 5 ea inn, Ric I lair olfnr, Aurniv lire solo fU unrs ear Ile state Part tat sermuss rip N rev 1 am stir IN fa J normal a V y }sear air urhe/ler I uses file pirsa/nd I Jh, d tilt L •,v4nrr� Had Gansmnt 17, 'j73— xmuaas mnpnw an rmesimm gnearly$M0aT Tlehtso ft89 tursl HF unr A-W $2S000 Jo, t1, pmlrny /p nsnmmat p rp r, Thin a M" $1250 onganrmhmr q/rnd as i512 5 I a,Pntmg to maintain a md!gaus Cmlhkt ustr. frnt class {'n'Jee,ors 1,711, 'ter Ins than 107 aj,,mW sfak o i The Inter continues. stating that the members of the Church of the i Brethren did not keep then word I tY Inid's Iciter throw water on the name-change campaign The townspeople serreti{ sassed to wad until his death Thrrdom any name chat, ideas were postponed unid the death of 1 W fund I tV lord 10 go m his hold on Ile and the twee that bare his name rn 1917 Londsburg residents nutted tau On June 21 1917 a date was made to held a puNx debate on the Issue N wheth,•r the city wd Lords. huh; should be thangad to Le kbme "any pmmmem men of the city took pan m this discussion along with dim" rP the La k$rne Orange and emun Gnnsen Asawratxm The debate was held in the college " audnunum and:he'unit 28 issue d 'f the leader repotted the debate tt —ults "femherssithedebateasudd t not fund one person who was hat ed m a narne change. e Maw points brought up at t1, rneeung as reported Fry the Leader wire as follows I The mtemse, lnmsburg and fa Itmt an m l,mnlon It a atmady ore Community 2 Rv*,n tA, L ttmrarm utmgdhrlg their mad putmnrled fonisbuty smut then um W hadahnad m�u��dntly M, er the citrus lad, from the ha time OmnAt and Liman As.,,Wa , MT that now pn mmeralu It um sated that ae, 6070M hors hind TON' cut iron. 'he Assatalpn dungP:Jmr {eat xxum a h UM P,", f than under Me name !a ttmr. they 4e q thehumandcvunry um,!d he mom cAsrly trot +m�tfhn and "mind help business rural and church fricrpn." gthe afx fmm utrwh Mew 5 The name 'Lrdshuirg is j* Cled h maw it autsams musts comment aml avehnrn ndscule pu ils qmm schttI, n� haa� Ih by WsIsSu ehrd aur9Anleaisrrs I'm auay frunr ham; 'ryNemf the., 'rs easa as essranu m 1,71,47 N aual the 1,n {Peasrnaess Sme u9m do n, Iron the origin q the name h,4 upm , as sarnlepm 6 �%G fm,ment del v m oppus- mart v l fmght shipments, hmrar y tai/iamP this tam udh lonlsdrrg Neu' e Afaaa lnauw lath art on the Santa & "em, And finally 7 Me fenj sad a q year peepm N his death that he um u7llnig N hate e I/ a po�(a change the now rf they so desired. 1 the rime will net shag domsitrt N him Neu the end of the nv eron& bailors wire posed around to the people ci Lnedsburg The results were in 96 Yes and U na U *me area res -kilm woted toa All 21 vo d sit Atom elethom took place and MOM cm nnutters wire set up The ary was divided ,t, her Whons ssith its rnsn rummntec responsible for di- mbutmg a remdpn in the ter n1,• y Amher tle'miun was Ieid Aug 9 1917 The Lumaburg -la \erne IrsJet printed the results tts wcxts 239 Y n vexes 81 In the Aug 23 issue the paper stated 'u VERNE iS NOW THE OFFICIAL NAME- It become s.i 1,n Aug 16, 1917 at 8 48 pm A celebration to commrmnrate ,he ewtnt ueik place in the culls*', auditorium whin a rsgota •mm,a ,, ceremurN pined klm Lnrdsburg Afr Lei A"c It spas to be a partner ship that has endured for iU 3taR 5 Larry Henderson explained the procedure for deslgnat and moving the structure. Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. Commissioner Banks stated that she eft the economic value as a commercial use would be great if it s to roman at the site. Commissioner Arner moved to r ommend to City Council the approval of the Historic Landmark Besig ion of 7165 Etiwanda Avenue. Commissioner Banks seconded the mot The motion was carried by the following vote AYES: COMMIISS ERS: ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT NOES C SSIONERS: NONE ABSENT, COMMISSIONERS: STAMM, HASKYITZ -- carried r i r r r r E HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 6797 NELLNdU! AYENt1E RANCHO propasa o es gna e e or ouse, e man venue, a Historic Landmark - APN: 202- 061 -12. Arlene Banks presented the staff report. Chairman Schmidt opened the Public hearing. Hearing none, Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. Commissioner Billings verified the significance of the house Commissioner Billings moved to recommend to City Council the approval of Historic Landmark Designation of 6797 Hellman Avenue, excluding the out buildings. Commissioner Arner seconded the motion The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, SCHMIDT NOES COMMISSIONERS NONE ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: STAMM, NASCYITZ -- carried 3/7 "PC MINUTES -S- MAY S. 1988 RESOLUTION ND. 89 -09 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIL PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A HISTORIC LANDMARK TO DESIGNATE THE LORD HOUSE LOCATED AT 6797 HELLMAN. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK - APN: 202- 061 -12 advertisedNpubblic hearing consider Preservation cOn Commissi n has held a Historic Landmark Designation. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission hereby ma es a ottowing findings for the Lord House and Its site. A. Historical and Cultural Signlflcance: I The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. a. The proposed landmark was connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting, 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, and city. SECTION 2: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEOA. (Article 19, Sect on NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamong9a Historic nn Preservation Colssion does hereby recommend approval of Historic Landmark Designation of 6797 Hellma , The Lord House and its site, to the City Council. xowrg. ROVED AN D OPTED S STN DAY OF m4y. 1988. BY: a man" AYES: cOMMISSIONERS. BILLINGS, AMER. BANKS, COOPM,R, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE �i G ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STId4M, HASKVITZ C RESOLUTION N0. g0 'tID6� •i A RESOLUTION CF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 3 ES��ONC FITHENLORD�HOUSEILOCATED AT HISTORIC 679 AVENUE AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK - APR: 202 - 061 -12 WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a dull advert'sed public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Historic Landmrrk Designation and issued Resolution No. 88-09 recommending to this City Council that said Historic Landurk Designation be approved. WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed ail input from the Historic Preservation Commission regarding said Historic Landmark Designation. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby makes the 'ellowingiin-dings: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. 4. The proposed landmark was connected with a business or use which was once common but Is now rare. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting• 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed landmark in its iccation represents an established and familiar visual feature of the refghborhood, community, and' city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve the Historic Landmark Designation of the Lord House. 3�9 CITY OF RAIJCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1588 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE FISHER HOUSE, 7165 ETIN AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. AS A LANDMARK I RECC}MEHDATIOH: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends a e y uncfl e.esignate 7165 Etiwanda Avenue a landmark. Il. BACKGROUND: This house, located across Etiwanda Avenue from the Zfa— f`ey- 'Wrcia 'Amuse, is a Queen Anne Victorian -style structure built in 1892. From 1907 to 1930 the switchboard of The Home Telephone Compdny, a mutual cooperative company owned by Etiwanda citizens, was located In this house and operated by Mrt. Florence Fisher and her daughter, Nellie. The house is significant because of its architecture, it. age, and its historical role in the development of Etiwanda. The property is located in the Cociaunity Services Overlay District and the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. The Plan provides substantial incentives to help foster preservation of 'notable' structures; e.g., they may be converted to various cemercial and professional uses with a Conditional Use Permit on this portion of Etiwanda Avenue. In addition, the Plan also permits noteble structures to serve as a 'bonus' for residential developments on lots of 1 acre or more. These structures are not included in density calculations and do not reduce the number of new dwellings permitted. Mr. Robert Flocker, owner of thfc house as well as several adjacent lots, is oppored to designation. Mr. Flocker is planning to sell the house and have it relocated possibly outside the City. Although landmark status would not necessarily prevent removal, the Historic Preservation Commission would review relocation plans. Hr. Flocker does not wish to be subject to such review. He does not want to demolish the house, but ho does want to clear the land and sell it for development. He has expressed his opposition in writing as well as orally (a copy of applicable correspondence is attached for reference). �.?!i ?S b-,j• .. . _ _� .Jn r ° V i CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT The Fisher House Junc 15, 1988 Page c III. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ACTION: The Historic Proservat "m Mm ss on voted unan anus y recommend landmark designation at Its Hay S. 1988 meeting. The Commission, felt that the house was Important enough to warrant designation. They thought it should be kept near other important historic structures in Etiwanda. If the Fisher House must be moved, they would prefer that it be relocated p close to its currant location. Resp lly ted r Bul r City nner 88:AB.vc 1 Larr,/ Henderson explained the procedure for designation and moving the structure. Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. Commissioner Banks stated that she felt the economic value as a r, commercial use would be great if it was to remain at the site. Comnissioner Arner moved to recommend to City Council the approval of the Historic Landmark Designation of 7165 Etfwanda Avenue. Commissloner Canks seconded the notion. The motion was carried by thr following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STAMM. HASKVITZ r r r r r r E OF 6797 - tarried Arlene Banks presented the staff r e ort. Chairman Schmidt opened the pu fc hearing. Hearing none, Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearmn Commissioner Billings vtrlfied a significance of the house. Commissioner Billings moved recommend to City Council the approval of Historic Landmark Designati of 6797 F;ellman Avenue, excluding the out buildings. Commissioner ner seconded the motion. The motion was carried by the following v te: AYES: CGMMISSIONERS: B:LLT"GS, AUER, BANKS, COOPER, SCHMIDT NOES: COMYiSSIONFR . NO ABSENT* C014MISSIONZ S. STAMM, lASKVITZ -- carried 4az HPC MINUTES -S- MAY S. 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 5, 1988 at TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDOM DESIGNATION OF 7165 ETIWANOA AVENUE wan a +rP e RANCHO - AN: 27- 133u%venue,aHistoric Lawdmark se PROJECT ANO SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re nested: That the Historic Preservation Commission g a City Council f esodesi designating the --We House, 7165Etlwanda Avenue. Rancho Cucamonga, a Historic Landmark. B. Location: The house 1s on the east side of Etiwanda Avemle, nOrU707 Base Line Road, south of the Pacific Electric tracks and across the street from the Chaffey- Garcia House. C. Site Land Uses Zonin - General Plan Desi nation: The site :s an unoccup ee_d',�oar'o up, s ng a 5r5 v res ence. The zoning is determined by 00 Etiwanda Spec:fic Plan It 1s in the Low - Medium Density Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). Thu General Plan also dosignates it es Low - Medium Density. The Etiwanda Specific Plan includes the property in the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District and the Community Service Overlay District. C. Surroundtn Land Usc - Zonin General Plan Designation: O rW vacant. es gna a ow- um es en a oie111ng units per acre) on the Etiwanda Specific P,an Map and also on the General Plan Map. It is within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District and the South - Vacant twith al new Ochain-linktfence); Designated Low - Hedlum Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per as e) on the Etiwanda Specific Plan and on the General Plan. East - Vacant; Same destgratlon as above. The property to the east is not within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District or the Community Service Overlay District. HPC STAFF REPORT RE: 7165 ETIWMDA AVE. may S. 1908 Page 2 Nest - The site 1s directly across the street from the Chaffgy -Garcia House which is on land designated "L ", Low Density -lcsidential (2 -4 dwelling units ;.jr acre) in the Victoria Planned Community Specific Plan. However, the Chuffey Garcia House is within the Etiwanda Avenue overlay District and the Community Service overlay District. E. Overt Districts Nithin the Etlwanda eCific Plan: The s er muse s w n a wan a ,venue vor ay ittrlct and the Conaunity Service Overlay Distrii :t. 1. The Etlwanda Specific Plan contains provisions tailored to the Etiwsnda area. These provisions w-lace City- wide regulations. They were adopted to tire into account Etiwanda's special character, while allowing a reasonable level of development. Throughout the Plan, there are references to hi ;torical features such as period architecture, windbreaks and tree lined streets, and rock curbs. The Plan encourages historic preservation. 2. The purpose of the Etlwanda Avenue Overlay District is to protect and enhance the visual and historical character and the quality of Etiwanda Avenue and its Immediate surroundings. kinimum setbacks are 25 feet with a 30 foot average setback. Structures facing Etiwanda Avenue must be at least 25 feet apart. Styles are encouraged to be traditional and field stone used as major design element. A single family appearance is to be amintained and landscaping is to be consistent with the streetscape theme contained in the Plan. 3. The Community fervice Overlay District was formed to Provide opportunities for limited or specialized, low - impact commercial and quasi- commercial services. Its purposes are to provide a focal point in the heart of the community that reinforces a sense of community identity and to encourage perpetuation of features that are tied to Etiwanda's heritage. With a Conditional Use Permit and provisions that assure no adverse impacts and enhancement of the visual and historical character of Etiwanda, professional offices, restaurants, beauty shops, farmers markets and similar uses could be Permitted, as well as schools, churches, connunity buildings and the like. HPC STAFF REPORT RE: 7165 ETIWANDA AVE. May S. 1988 Page 3 F. Description: The Historic Resources Inventory form describes ch s of use as Spindle -work Queen Anne. The description reads as follows: construct Irregular shaped iorwithcombina story tionOf Structure hipped and front and side gables. Roof has composite shingles. Eaves are enclosed. Gable ends have shinggle treatment and detailed verge boards. Siding 1s flush boards. An integral porch is located on the front with lattice work frieze susppended under porch telling, turned porch arepoftwood. sThereea ersimilarePorchesrlocatedo Lathe rear of the structure on both tie north and south sides. Foundation material 1s wood. Doors and wlndo+:s are unknown, date to being boarded. The structure is located on a large, vacant lot of 10 acres. A barn of similar structure was located at the rear of this structure, however, it has collapsed. There are two large trees located to the front of the house, between the dirt driveways. A row of trees lines the street in front of this structure.$ pp The Magnolias, tand sai tall oWashington hFan ePalme stands bcloser to the street. Silk Oeks line the edge of the property near the stone curbs. II. ANALYSIS: A. Back round - General: This house was selected from the list if Potent a an r s dentified in the 1987 survey. 8. Reasons far -Designation: This house is significant because of estima nto an-era u i is have been built In Etiwanda The First estimated 100 Years gives an 1892 date, it is also s gn can ecause was a location of the switchboard for the Home Telephone Company which was organized in June of 1907 and otmed by the r1ople of Etiwanda. The switchboard was staffed by Mrs. Florence Fisher and her daughter Nellie. The switchboard was moved and mechanized in 1930 Iss�'s: This house is unoccupied and boarded up. Designation cou perhaps help along the process of rehabilitation and reoccupuetlon. The City's Development Code allows landmark residences to be used for non - residential Purposes with a C ,,nditlonal Use Permit, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan also Y-.Llir "PC STAFF LrPORT RE: 7165 ETINAHDA AYE. may 5, 1988 Page 4 provides for alternative uses. Funds for rehabilitation, however, are scarce. If the building is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and if it were to be converted to commercial use nr rental residential use and needs substantial rehabilita,.,on, then it might qualify for a 20% Income tax credit for certified rehabilitation. There is also a possibility that future California Bond funds could becow, hasiao Interest In which a local facade municipal aen). agency Ontthe other hand, rehabilitattion for owner- occupancy could take place as development pressure in the area increases. Respectful rehabilitation that is in harmony with the Yfetorlan architecture of the house would help set the tone for this stretch of Etiwanda Avenue. The rehabilitation if the Chaffey- Garcia House has provided a solid start in tf.e direction of developing this area in accord with the vision embodied in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Fisher house is worthy of recognition as a landmark and should be encouraged to follow in the steps of the Chaffey -Garcia House and be reclaimed. D. Environmentel Assessment: Designation of a landmark 1s exelt ram t requ remen s title 19, Section 15308). III. MTS FOR FINDINGS• Criteria selected from the Ordinanct: that are ap�a5Te o e Sher House are as follows: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1 The proposed iandmark is particularly repre,.entative of ar historical period and style. 2 The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind 4 The propoced landmark is connected with a (historic) business. 8 Historical Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. U!,/ HPC STAFF REPORT RE: 7165 ETINANDA AVE. Hay S. 1958 Page 5 r 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an S, established and familiar visual feature of the V ' community. s. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n� - WaIT —Re ort newspaper and notices have been sent to the owner ano proper owners Mthiu 300 feet. A message was left on the owner's ansdering tape informing him of the upcoming hearing. + V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomends that the Historic Preservation o—m ss on recoaeend to the City Council that they adopt a Resolution designating the Fisher House a landmark because it meets the criteria established in the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Such &signaticn is also in conformity with policies of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and the EtiwanAda Specific Plan. Respectfully submitted, -A Larry Henderson Senior Planner LH:AB:ko Attachments 3e? 7 CITY OF RA.Xcm CucAmoN ,A HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 7165 Etlwanaa Ara. mi, Fisher Hots,-- TITLE: EXHIBIT SCALE• %VIT x.mat I II°9° i ij - 6 :aatlnr i' ni.fT1/ 1 'I g, I �o Rom off° * I a �° /. *10 M / _ O O Ft',<hor f4m sc * * * ** Nctable Structures 6056 (Addross) ♦chatfoy /Qarcla House to be rolocated Foothill blvd. S.P. NOTABLE 5-43 STRUCTURES 347 i a t z �k I city of Rancho Cucamonga RID io STORICUNOtt4RE DESIGNATION NISTORIC POINT Oy INTIREST DESIONATION •__j_Hfstoric Landmark Historic Point of Interest �f IDE M TICATRK I. Common Plasmas 9. RSetorin If it know Ft n H S. . S. or Ouse or Morton-FiSher House Street or Rural Address 7)95 gtlwnd+ Annut , Cltyt 11anoDO fgawnge ESP$ 91719 Conntyt, Sin eerserdfno Asseaser -a Parsel Plo. F77.111- ;} goes Et1v. So. Pl: (N Legal Descriptiou_EH.und, ro)anv tarot tnt )2 Olt K _ Presest Osaer, it kaoel_ A= Fleeter Address 9275 To9et CStysJnn nn QUWUL SIP' 91701 Omerskip ass Public: —t•- Present Vass Original Vass dingle Family Relic nee Other Past Means Single Frs11y Msldence DESCII MION 0. Briefly describe the Prseat Phreleel swaraso0 of the alts or structure ead elssaribe any major al era oas ran its oriCiaal •eni Anne V Inv nt r ro TMf S fndlewrk Qugnn Anne Ylctarl+n no use his a coup as DDe ran port o3 u t urns snits +nd a lalt(tn Iris ;a. +nd won Do+rd miming It Is Do+Nid uD 7. lacatlos sketch sap (draw A label airs add sMrraxaQing streets, road•, and prosimst isdsrka)s SEE 336 g. Approximate property sizes Lot Size (in teat) yrantage Depth or approx. acreage B. Conditions (check one) a. Excellent - -b. -pond_ c. Pair_L, d. Detsrlorated s. No longer in sistenca 10. Is the futures I. Altered?_ b. Unmltsredty7pernrUty 11. Surroundlagxt (check more th one it necessary) a. Open land 1 b. Rsidentlal i C. Scattered buildings_ d Densely built -up__ e coremrcfal f Industrial —�—" p. Other 12. Threats to Site, ' a. Ross known__ b. Private development x p, Zoning — 0. Duhlla eceCe Project e, yandallem X f. Other 1 12. Dates o! enalomed photolrapb(s) 1987 and Igo$ —_ ROTRI The following (lteme 1019) are for structures only. la. Primary exterior bulldlag materials a. d. Adoh Stcss� Brick " c, Stucco— e— e. Wand % t, Other r » IS. is the Stru -ture: A. on Its original sits4 Y b. Roved? a. Dnknora? ` 10. Year of initial Coesttuetlon, 1895 This Date lat a. Fnotual D. Ltlmated r 17. Architect (if knows), IS Sander (if knowu)t 19. Belated Pasture, a. Sera b. Carriage home* ' c. Omtheuce d. Shed(m) e. Formal O►rdna(s) f. Windmill g. WAtertwsr /taskDOUSe D. Otber_tn•t 1. Rome B1,R1r1am 20. Briefly state historical sad /or arabitectural importance (include dates, erects, and Persovs ase*clated with the sit,, when known), Se• Sate Foro) Naq Telephone CmeanY Switchboard located here froe 1907 to ,910. Srltch�Wcard was run by Pinnnce fisher and her laughter. Nellie. 21, Main those cf the historic resources 4ngNlti%Ygagt(ah j: a. Archltaoture_-L_ b. Arts i LaSenre C- Economlo /ladusttial t d. Government a. Explorstloo /Settlement f. Military. ~ R Rellglon b. Social /Education 22. Sources, List books, documents, surveys, pe sad their date*, 1 Refo K i 1 entno nal lntarvSars, .1wna, _th. r, a sBd re 21 Date form prepare* .ltlril. 1998 BY (name), Arlene Banff Address: City, Zip,_ Phone: _• Orilani.atton: o/ Re nthp (u�a6pnpa 3 C1 Sutr of Ca1wofine- The Rnourpr A4eh[T Sar No 171n — 77 OE1A ATM ENT OS PARKS ANORECR EAT ION wASS_HAEA— LOe —_SHL No �VR Status_ utat A ll- a51E70- 3775775 C _ HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY 0 0 IDENTIFICATION I Common nlme Fisher House 2 Historic name Fisher House 7. Strait or rural address. 7165 etiwanda Avenue C,:v RdnChO Cscamoncia, Calif. Zip 91739 _County San Bernardino a Parcel number 0217- 131 -23 5 Present Owner Robert f Flocker Address: 6226 Tobaz City Rancho Cucamoij Calif, Zip 91701 Ownarshlp d: Public Pnvue X 6. Present Use- ReaidPnCe Original use Residence DESCRIPTION 7s. Arm tKtural sMr. Sol nd Iework Queen Anne 7b. Briefly describe the prnent priyucal appearance of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its original condition: An Irregular shaped single story structure of wood Construction with combination Of hipped and front and side gables Roof has Composite Shingle$ Eaves are enclosed Gable ends Iive shingle treatment and detalled verge boards Siding Is flush boards An Integral porch is located on the front with latice work frieze suspended under porch Ceiling, turned porch supports and spindle- work In the balustrade Fortifies are of wood There are similar porches located at the rear of the structure on both the north and south sides Foundation raterial Is wood Doors and windows are unknown, due to beirg boarded The structure Is located on a large, vacant lot of 10 acres A barn of similar structure was located at the rear of this structure, however, it has collapsed There are two large trees located to the front of the house, between the dirt driveways A row of trees lines the street to front of this structure Curb in this area is original stone 334 OPR 523 (Rev 11185) 8. Construction date Estimates 1895 Factual_ 9 Architect Unknown 10. Buddn_ Unknown 11 Approx. property site (in feet) Frontage D /pth_- orapprox. acreage 10 12. Date(,) of enclosed photograpnh) July 1987 10. Condition: .acdimt,Goad —Fair _ Oetenorstm X No long*, In eaitlene__ 11. Alterations: Removal o• surrounding grove: boarding of structure I& Surroundings: Own land X Sattered bulidinge _ Oanssly built-up Residential ential x CIndnrial x Commedal_ftar: 19. Thnentosite: Now known_printodevalopmmt X Zonhq— Vandalism public Works prolm — Other: 17. It the structure: On Its arigLwl dtegy_ Moved? Unknown) t& Reiatw / feature,: SIGNIFICANCE 19. ariany state hgtonal and /or *,Mhectural 4nportenca (Include dater. "anti. and wrtont emciated with we slteJ Location of the switchboard for the Home Telephone Co a put stock co owned by the people of Etlwanda and o- gainzed on 612107 The switchboard was "wommaned" by Frs Florence Fisher and her daughter Nellie. The switchboard was moved and mechanized in 1930 70. Pen theme of the h,modc resource: lit mae than om Is Chocked, numbu in order of imparanca,) Architecture Arts & Lsiwre Emramic/IndusfHw LEXPlorstloNSndament Government Millar, Religion Social /Eduatim 21. Sources (Litt books, documana. surveys, Personal Interviews and Moir date,). "A field Guide to American Homes ", Virginia and Lee McAlester gZ note f,mri prepared Se2t emher 29, 1987 ey (name) Lynn Herri l l Organization Address: City . Lp Phone: — Loational sketch map (draw WW label site and aurrounding ttmn, rams, and ptaninent landmarks): '�E• ACQoT NORTH eflwpklOA 0va4. R.Y)0.41a A�L� .y . G'Wtwe❑ Q 333 HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY The Home Telephone Company was organized on June 2, 1907 by a group of Etiwanda citiztns as a mutual cooperative company. The r..arliest solid data found is a bill dated June 27, 1907 for four dollars, annual fee for service rendered for an instrument at Zanjero's house. A letterhead of The Home Telephone Company dated May 18, 1908 listed: J.C. Jones, President; C.N. Ross, Vice President; Isaac ,ones, Secretary; N.H. Frost, Manager; and J Stegmeier. A later letterhean listed J.0 Jones, President, J Stegmeier, Vice President and Manager; John Scott, Secretary; N.H. Frost and Isaac Jones, Directors to venber 25, 1910 the Etiwanda Water Company was billed, Assess - ,cent $3 00, January dues f1.0U. CThe switch board was lof.ated to Mrs Florence Fisher's home in Lot 12, Block K, 7165 Etiwanda Avenue She and her daughter Nellie operated the central office vs it was a nanual system. Additions have been built to the plant by applications for service until 'rom a single wire connecting two points in Etiwanda, it had grown to cover a considerable area in the district. The revenues derived from operations of the home Company had not been proportionate to the increase in the cost of conducting the business, and although donations have been made by its members in add'tioi to the payment of their regular charges for service, the Company faced an Increasing indebtedness. The Home Company on May 26, 1930 was fur - nishing telephone service to seventy -seven stations in Etiwanda and vicinity under a uniform monLoly rate of SI 00 In 'iay 1930, the Home Company petitioned to withdr.iw from public utility operation and a hearing was held on the application of the Associated -194- 33� -HO CU<:AMONGA California 91701 w'o e,. W. N. c—� uu, 91M. M41 Ivl As You know, a pulbic hearing on the proposed designation of your property as a landmark will take place on Kmy S. IM. We hops that the staff report, excerpts true the California Office of Historic Preservation Handbook and from the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the Historic Preservation Ordinance were helpful. Last year, the City undertook a surrey of its historic resources in order to document the structures, sites, landscapes, and districts that are of historic, architectural, cultural or engineering lntarest. Your property at 1165 Etiwanda Avenue was listed as a potential landmark because of its Victorian architecture and its association with the history of Etiwanda. It 4s the City's wish to preserve, protect and enhance its histarlt resources, since there 1s arch that is new and so little that reamles tram earlier times. 7ho heritage of the communities of Rancho Cucamonga is 1s:portant to the City's image and identity, and homes such As the one you own are an important part of that heritage. llifs 1s especially important on Etiwanda Avenue whi,:h the Etiwanda Specific Plan highlights for historic preservation. As City staff, we feel a sense of respect for our 1.1ty's historic buildings and places, and we desire to be of service to owners of these properties. The City's intention is not to cause difficulties or problems for you in formally reco;nfzing the contribution that you property crakes to the coaaalnit . There designated. ou0urdexper experience isrthatosuch recognitiondIshA Pointnof prldeoand often means enhanced property Values rather than a problem. The City intends to work in a cooperative spirit with enners of landmarks in the event .that_ advice ,on proper consthructionrm terialshand processes In Providing protect lthe historic value. If you have any further questions, please call me at 989 -1861. We hope you will concur with designation of your property as a landmark. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION Arlene Banks Associate Planner AB: ko 333. 0 IhA !I Ilrlwlll 10mrb Nn hl I R L,unm \I 6226 Topaz Alta Loma, CA 91701 May 2, 1968 Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission The City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Commission ilembrrs: - RL•�E1VED- Cfit'OP'Kr:tCHO PASIO OttW PllJ<Nd:7 OMSION AM " . 1988 IM 71819iU1U112i'- w't3t�1316 Re: Notice of public hearing concerning proposed historic landmark designation of 7165 Etiranda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga. APN0227- 131 -23 I am the owne, of that certain structure known as the Fisher House, 7165 Ettwanda Aveltue Please take notice that s,nce July of 1986. I have offered to appropriate parties the above structure to be moved to another site If the '.1ty of Rancho Cucamonga desires to purchase and move the structure to another location (As you know, the Garcia House was moved directly rcrosr the street), I will be happy to offer this building to the city at a greatly reduced price H'h11e I share the cormission's concern for seeking out and reviewing potential structures for preservation, I hereby object to any effort by the :onnisslon to designate this house as an historic landmark if such designation would prevent Its relocitlon Sincerely, Robert C Flocker 33 (6 rl'k IVEN R,epv,e 6910 I1-Y"MurA A,,Sune 106 Nd.don, Ina van Nup. fSlifemu 9lfM Ain Code AIR / 909 -Tito May 4. 1968 {, Robert Floeker 6226 topaz Avenue Alta Loma, CA 91701 " Dear Bob, r. 1 In order to verify your continuing two -year effort to sell your house on Ettwanda Avenue to oc moved onto another site, I will be happy to appear at a Rancho Cucamonga City Council meeting to state the following fart; During Jul and August of 1%6, I prepared a written presentation for AT &T in New York prbtosinlg that they purchase your house and pay the cost of moving 1% to another location for restoration. My associates and I also submitted an outline for a proposed television commercial to be produced showing that AT &T cares about preserving and renovating atnxtures of historical interest. While this plan was rejected 'based upon other prior AT &T advertising commitments, discussions were held with them throughout August. I believe this will prove your intent to have the louse relocated, while respecting its potential historical significance to the community. Please let me know if I can help. Rest regards, rl:�l `James T Flocker Producer /Wide World of Flying JTF•kd 337 i 6226 Topaz Alta Loma, CA 91701 May 51 1988 Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission The City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Notice of public hearing vticerning proposed historic landmark designation of 7165 Etlwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga. APN 0227- 131 -23 Dear Commission Members: This letter is to update my letter of May 2, 1988. 1 would like to go on record again as being opposed to the designation of the Fisher house, (7165 Etiwanda Avenue), as an historic landmark. 14y family has owned this property for over 30 years. I have received 2 offers to purchase the house to be moved and expect others in the next 4 weeks. I will make a decision within the next month as to which offer to accept Any action by the Historic Preservation Commission Mat prevents or restricts me from selling and moving the house from ay property will create a financial loss to me. Sincerely, q4'-�A L qu, Robert C Flocker 338" 6226 Topez Alta Loma, CA 91701 May 6, 1988 ' Arlene A Banks, Associate Planner , The City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline F.oad Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Ar,ane I am disappointed that In spite of your repeated personal assurances to me of your intent (and that of the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission) to "cooperate with property owners ", the commission made their reccomendation last night concerning my property, without regard to my wishes Now I am concerned about another representation which you made to me, both in writing and orally, assuring me that the city r „mot and will not prevent my house from being roved off my property a•: reiccated either within or outside the city once a sale of my house is complete The reason for this concern is the conflicting and uncertain statement made last night by your associate, fir Larry Henderson, that "A permit is required to move the house either insfJe or outside the city ” Please provide me with verification in writing, s,gned by an appropriate officer of the city station that The City of Rancho Cucamonga will not attempt to interfere with the famediate pending sale and relocation of my house now located at 7165 Etiwanda Avenue 1 will then show this assurance letter to my buyer in order to complete the sale of my house S'ncerely, Pobert L rlocker cr Eric S Jacobson, Esq 33y' QCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA e,.. ae.. W. wt Rae.ao c..� e4wa,1. viw. 17141 vvaul May 25, 1_ Mr. Robert C. Flocker 6226 Topaz Rancho CucamOxga CA 91701 Dear Mr. Flocker; In response to your letter of Mty 6, it is the policy of the Historic Preservation. Commission to work cooperatively with owners to protect, Preserve and enhance historic properties in the City. As City Staff, we desire to be of service to owners of these properties. Your property clearly meets the criteria in the Historic Prea•rvation Ordinance for landmark designation. It was hoped that the material given to you about the Etfwanda Specific Plan, easements, income tax credits, code provisions permitting adaptive reuse of landmark residences, and other erograms wuld help to clarify that it could be an advantage to have the Fisher House' designated a landmark. On the matter of relocation, as you know, designation does not rule out relocation but relocation plans would have to be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preserv+:lon Commission. The City and the Commission would, of course, prefer a historic house to be kept in its original location, but that is rot always feasible. The Building Department stated that a permit for moving a non - designated house through the streets I� required, but no further permit is required if a house is relocated outside the city. The requirements of the jurisdiction in which the house is relocated must be complied with. However, according to for a our person Preservation Ordinance Section 224100H, it is unlawful landmarkeuntil final carry aaction of cause a material uncil , denying the propcsed designation, is taken. The consideration of designating your property, (the Fisher House), is expected to be on the City Council agenda of June 15, 1988. We would like to reemphasize provisions fn the Etfwanda Specific Plan that 'notable" existinq structures "shall bE incorporated into the design of new developments wherever possible. On lots of 1 acre or more, these structures shall not be included in density calculations, and will not reduce the number of new dwellings parmitted." In other words, by combining lots to meat the I acre criterion, the developer can have whatever number of units are allowed, plus the 'extra' historic house. 3* Ua� OE Cw�,L.�1.n eoaa N. Bm.v l,ercr r'�"a 1- s� chm"l. mpun 11 Paola 1. ., Aohert C. Flocker-,-I Y Fisher House May 25, 1988 Page 2 p` 4 Landmark status would also provide the advantage of the use of the Historic Building Code which allows less costly rehabilitation, a ( thrijcti�igni n usneasthtdd athrt youuobeonsto desat dootmnayoucons iderit unworthy of such recognitio *l. We hope we can work together with you to arrive at a satisfactory solution. You will be se---t a copy of the Staff Report when it it prepared for the City Council orseting. Please call me i! you have any questions. Sincerely, COMMUNITY OEVELOPMENT'DEPM7NENT PLANNING D�IVISIIOON, Arlene Banks Associate Planner AB:mlg cc: Larry Herderson Brad Buller Otto Kroutil 3f/ I AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COOP ARNER, BAhlts, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT HOES: C&MY';5rnuroc. mur ABSENT: COMMIj3WWERS: STAMM, HASKVITZ -- carried D. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 7165 ETIWANDA AVENUE RANCHO I e7 t wFian�a- Avenue Pa Historic Landmark- APN: i227r131 -Yi. Arlene Banks presented the staff report. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing Robert Flocker, owner of 7165 Etiwanda Avenue, the Fisher House, expressed his opposition to the designation. Copies of his written obJections were distributed to the Commission. Commissioner Banks stated that one of Mr. Flocker's main concerns is that the landmark status would prevent moving, which is not the case. She stated he would have to come before the Commission with an Alteration Permit. She stated that the house is of great significance, that across the street from the house are two landmarks and there are the north and close together great She stated athatoifhtheiowner decides to move it that it will stay close by and maybe the property could be converted to commercial use. Larry Henderson, Senior Planner, questioned if Mr. Flocker was planning to sell the property and the structure. Mr. Flocker stated that not at this time. He stated he feels the house Is in the middle of the four acres and in the way of being able to develop the Property. He stated that he has been trying to sell the house for some time and has I.ad two offers Larry Henderson questioned if the two offers had expressed any idea as to what purpose or location. Mr Flocker stated that it was for residential use and they had desired keeping it in Etiwanda Larry Henderson questioned if the structure was designated, would it Jring a better selling price j�,,y�,�. Mr Flocker stated that he did not see , Hopi it would, but would place mere restrictions on the property. He stated that it should be up to the property owner to have their property or structure designated. HPC MINUTES -4- MAY 5, 1988 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -07 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOM MOING APPROVAL TO DESIGNATE THE FISHER HOUSE LOCATED AT 7165 ETIWANDA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMORGA, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission had held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Historic Landmark Designation No. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Presc�vation Commission hereby ma esk Me following findings: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period and style. 2 The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which is now rare 3 The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. 4. The proposed landnark is connected with a (historic) business. B. Historical Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 2 The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the community. SECTION 2: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEpA. (Artfcle 19, Section NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commmission does hereby recommend approval of The Fisher House as a Historic Landmark to the City Council. ROVED AND AD TED THIS 5TH DAY OF MAY, 1988. BY o m a maann -- AYES COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: �� ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION N0. B%- qv(� A CUCAMAGA, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO HOUSE LOCATEDLAT 716E ETIWANDAGAVENUE. RANCHO C CARORGA, AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission had held a duly advertised p•mblic hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Historic Landmark and 4sided Resolution No. 88_07 the Historic RPPreservationycommissf commission dingdsaid Historic Landmark from Designation. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Coamfssfon hereby mi ds a ollowing findings: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: I. The proposed landmark 1s particularly representative of an historical period and style. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which 1s now rare. 3. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. 4. The proposed landmark is connected with a (historic) business. D. Historical Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1, The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of cne neighborhood. 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the community SECTICII 2: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA. (Article 19, Sect on Council doeesl, her by approve The RFisherr Aousetasha Historic Landmark. 34 34 a — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT in DATE: Junu 15, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE SSEDGE BOG ECOLOGICAL PRESERVE I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends a e y Council designate the Sedge Bog Ecological Preserve at Day Canyon a Point of Historic Interest. II. BACKGROUND: The Historic Preservation Commission requested that aiF iEem be brought to them for consideration. Commission members felt they wanted to give some recognition to a historically natural area. The site is partially within the Droposed Rancho Etiwanda Planned Unit Development located in an unincorporated area north of the Etiwanda coamunity, but within the C1t)'s General Plan Sphere of Influence. It appears to be the last remaining bog within the Santa Ana River basin. It 1s likely that an extensive prehistorical plant record has been left by pollens preserved within the peat bog which is estimated to be between one million and three million years old. The peat bog is contained within a sag pond formed by a branch of the Cucamonga fault. The permanently saturated soil that results from this condition inhibits the decomposition of organic matter. It also supports a rare plant community. The size of the bog varies and the exact perimeters will have to be determined by biologists from Chaffey College. The College is proposed to be the recipient of the bog portion of the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Unit Development. 'Sedge Bob Ecologic Reserve' is Chaffey College's name for the bog. CITY COUNCIL_STAFF REPORT POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST - SEDGE BOG June 15, 1988 Page 2 III. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ACTION: On May S. 1988, the s or c reserve on awn ss on Nei public hearing at which tl•ey passed a Resolution recommending that the Sedge Bog Ecological Area be designated a Point of Historic Interest. The purpose of this designation 1s for recognition purposes only. The area is not subject to review by the Historic Preservation Commission. The 7 reasons for designation are as follows: it is rare, of great age, is an established feature of the caaanity, and is of educations, and cultural as well as ecological value. Designation 1s consistent with the spirit of the intent and mission of the i Historic Preservation Commission. r Res ly su , 3rad ull city P r BB.AB:te Attachments: May 5, 1988 Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report MAY 5, 1988 Historic Preservation Cemaissi&n Minutes d'1/(- CPI'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: may 5, 1988 TO: Chairman and Hmmbers of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: POOR 01' INTEREST DESIGNATION FOR THE SEDGE BOG Droosa o ECOLOGICAL es pun pea 559 Known Sedge' Bog Ecological Preserve at Day Canyon as a Point of Historic Interest. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Background Site Characteristics: The Historic Preservation tOamrssron expresse concern c Out this Bog and reques•-d that it be brought up for consideration as a Point of h.storic Interest. Because the Bog is in unincorporated County land, taff first contacted San Bernardino County Historian, Ann Bethel, to flad out if the County has a program for designating landmarks, and learned that the County does not. Staff then began to work on designating the Bog a local Point of Historic Interest The site is partially within a 453 acre proposed project, Rancho Etiwanda Planned Unit Development, located in unincorporated land north of the Etiwanda area of the city. The proposal consists of the development of 453 single family residences on lots ranging from 12,000 square feet to over 3 acres. The site plan Shows an "ecological Seserve area" of 10.5 acres which contains the Sedge Bog /Sag Pond being cons4dered. This Bog has been a concern for several years, especially after it was disturbed in 1981 by a bulldozer. At that time, the southern portion belonged to Lewis Homes. It now belongs to Western Properties and 1s being developed by Coussoulis Development Company. The proposal for 453 hares warranted an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to supplement the information submitted when Lewis Homes made a similar proposal Information for this report comes mainly from the draft EiR for the project. HPC STAFF REPORT RE: SEDGE BOG MAY 51 1908 Page 2 Numerous faults cross the site. The peat bog is contained within a sag Pond formed by a branch of the Cucamonga fault. The fault apparently has formed an underground dam which forces water to the surface, resulting fn permanently saturated soil. This condition inhibits the decomposition of organic matter; over time, layers of undecomposed organic matter create a peat bog. These bogs, which support low - growing shrubs and herbaceous perennials are an extremely unusual plant caraunit, in Southern California. This may be the only remaining such bog within the Santa Ma River basin. M extensive prehistorical plant record left by pollens preserved within the peat may be present since the bog may date to the Pleistocene era, 1 to 3 million years ago. Its soil is described as Sedge Peat and is exceedingly rare. The size of the bog is difficult to determine because it varies depending on how wet or dry a year it is. What is clear is that some of the Bog is on the property to the north, and should be included in the Point of Historic Interest. The map indicating the location of the Bog is attached. —ill ��a - cum n - uenerai Plan Designation: The bog site, on entire Project 1s outside tie City limits. but within its sphere of influence. It 1s within the San Bernardino County West Yalley Foothills Community. The San Bernardino County General Plan was amended in 1980 to change the land use designation from RCN (Rural Conservation, one unit per 40 acre) to RES -1 (Residential, one unit per acre). The County Community Plan (zoning) was refined to reflect development constraints of the site and has assigned four different designations to the sate. The sag Pond is within the RES -1 designation and 1s surrounded by RES -1 land. The Community Plan states that open space should be maintained where environmental conditions preclude development and allows densities to be transferred to suitable land on other portions Of a site. The Plan furthermore permits density bonuses for building on slopes averaging less than 10 percent and for excellence in design. The City's General Plan designates the bog and overall project site as "Hillside Residential" and Indicate; that studies should be done to determine land holding capacity and development constraints. The General Plan stated that in no event will development exceed a residential density of 2 uiits per net buildable acre." (Page 201) This standard 1s also in the Development Code (Sec. 17.08.050 E.5) The General Plan also includes the ffollowing in its section on Implementation of 3�� a' - . HPC SIAF° REPORT RE: SEDGE BOG May 5. 1988 Page 3 the Environmental Resources Super - Element: "Implementation techniques. . , are aimed at two primary goals: ensuring that development practices are consistent with sound natural conservr•tion policies and that areas hazardous to public health and safety or Of significant biological importance remain as permanent open space.` (Page 211). The project requires approval of planned unit development M120- 44 by the County and a streamed alteration permit by State of California Department of Fish and Game. C. Draft Environmental Impact Report MitiSation. He are concerned ere on y mtigation measures re event to the Bog. Mitigation measures are intended to reduce ne9stive impacts of a project on the environment. The project includes a 10.5 ecological preserve with a twenty - foot wide buffer. The EIR recommends a 100 -foot buffer between the bog and a proposed equestrian trail and to eliminate proposed housing lots surrounding the bog. The EIR also recommends fencing and signing. The preserve is to be deeded to Chaffey College. The EIR asks for consideration to be given to the purchase of lands north of the bog for inclusion in the preserve to ensure viability of the watershed supplying the bog. It appears that the bog is sensitive enough that if the portion on tdiacent property is not also preserved, the long term existence of the bog is unlikely. Staff thinks that ar. overall preservation plan that looks at hydrology, grading, and other aspects of development around the bog should be prepared. The bog and associated vegetation to the north should all be considered part of the preserve, along with a 1GO -foot buffer of white sage which currently surrounds the bog and seems to be unusually resistant to invasion by other species of plants. The block wails at the rear of the adjacent broperties should back onto the buffer. The purpose of a uffer and wall is to protect the bog from invasion by pinr.ts or disturbance by people. The EIR also calls for avoidance of breaching the ur,derground dam (whose existence is inferred) during grading and redesigning an interceptor dike so that it will not interfere with the water supply to the bog. Prohibition of off - highway vehicles and firearms in open areas of the site is another mitigation measure. 3�f9 HPC STAFF REPORT RE: SEDGE BOG ft 5, 1988 Page 4 'w II. ANALYSIS Y A. Si nificance: The EIR mentions in several places that the bog TS MnTffcant. If the water supply is interfered with and the soils dry out, the anaerobic conditions would no longer be in effect and the wetland plants would die. Loss of the bog, according to the EIR, would constitute a significant impact of regional scale. Elsewhere, the EIR Sny that the peat bog plant community region. Itt states the inn remaining to its uniquenessnasha biotic resource, it creates an important rlldlife habitat because it is a wetland in an otherwise xeric area such as the Riversidean sage scrtb- dominated site. It provides water, cover and food for insect - eating wildlife. In addition, the paleoecoiogical pollen record adds to its value. B. Issues: The EIR states that loss of the Eog would be an aUverse impact of regional significance. A plan for preservation of the Bog to prevent such a loss can come out of the environmental review process. Such a plan should took at the Bog on its entirety and the nttural systems that keep it alive. The plan also needs to provide for future management of the Bog. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Historic Preservation Ordinance contains 7re--F5TTcwi—n§--c-rTTerIa to be considered a guide in making its determination: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. 3 The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind 4. The proposed landmark was connected with sax renowned, important, or local personality. 5 The proposed landmark is connected witn a business or use which was once cannon but is now rare. 6. The architect cr builder vas important. 7. The site is the location of an important historic event of building. 35v I.. hPt STAFF REPORT RE: SEDGE BOG Mly 5, 1988 Page 5 B. 11storic Architectural and Engineering Significance. T e construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed landmark are unusual or significant or uniquely effective. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual. C Ueighborhood and Geographic Setting. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the net hborhood, community or city. (Ord. 70 S9, 19' ). A strict and literal interpretation of the a standards would be that a natural area with little that is visua'iy striking does not meet the criteria for significance. But t, a proposed Point of Historic Interest definitely has attributes of importance and uniqueness that would bring it within the spirit of these criteria. The sedge bog 1s rare, of great age, and an established feature of the community. It may have the potential to reveal a wealth of information about plant life in the alluvial fan a million years ago. Since the criteria are a guide rather than narrow findings, staff thinks that there is ample roam to provide for the designation of an area such as this as a Point of Historic Interest. Furthermore, this designation is cumpatible with the Rancho Cucamon3a General Plan goal of preserving areas of significant biological importance. Iv ENV;10NMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Designation of a Historic Point o,' n eres s exemp unazr —CEQA. (Article 19, Section 15308). J CORRESPONCEHCE• Since the recommended action merely recognizes the f in terms of additiona ' Interest d Cityreview,atherecissnouneed for fo!mal o Public notice. n tnts the Bog analysis v n l addition, In V�edraftEIR have beenincludedi o in to the Sen Bern.irdlnu County Enviromaental Analysts Term, Jnl HPC STAFF REPORT RE: SEDGE BOG 7•. May 5, 1988 Page 6 VT. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomends that the Historic Prescrvetion a" omw sC —Trion pecoomnd to the City Council adoption of a Resolution to designate the Sedge Bog Ecological Preserve a Point of Historic 4 Interest. The preserve includes the entire Bog as shown on the nap and a 100 -foot buffer of natural white sage that now surround the Bog. Respectfully submitted, r p5 rye- des -..,.� �rry Henderson 3 Senior Planner I` LH:Ab:ko Attachawnts: Location Map Historic Point of Interest Form City of Rancho r.ucasocga Application for NIeIORIC LANDNAII[ DMIGNATION NISTORIC POINT OF INTNNLST DRSICNATION NlstorJO Landmark f Historic Point of Interest IDN"111CATION I. Cetus Names 5 eon Fcolc 1 ,1 Prof rve _ 2. Nlutorio Nerve, If house, 2. Street or Rural Address t_ .err tree• hnydn , C11:72 Sips County: San Bero,rdfiro Count) Asecaaor-s Para— y N �;l -le 1tJ' �gl;y6 Sues, GNal Descriptions Se._ ly -nd Ca. 7de1 h, I k... Highlands h 2 lands . Ltd . d. Pssaeat Owner, if taosa, l Post. Ltd u..e.n Prro.rt le. Addrees: e d a., 670 Pro 1107 I'mth111 Bl Cltyt_U,j,ed 21pt 91786 Oesarship in$ 11"111,10 Cucwonga. CA 91710 prleaty- e. prewat ones_ eon Orlsimal User— end Other pest user, 093CRIPTION e. Briefly describe the prss.st al a "ranee of thr site or Condition and Msarlhs nay or o corn casTros its ar: iloal CnndltlnU A e, n hr an. In th. fUL111111 nnvth of the cormV, City boundary. SurrounCed by White Ape. T. Lonatlos sketch sap (draw a label site and surrounding attests. rose, and proslosst landmarks): 3153 g. APProxiw,te Property size: Lot size (in last) Fran tax* Depth or arprou. acrup ., P. COArAtiont (check ono) r. Nxcnllest__ -y: Good- e Pair - d. Deteriorated_ r. No longer in existence__ 10. Is the feature: A. Alisredi_ Is. Unaltered?__ 11. Surroundings, (check mere tht one it necessary) a. open laud o. Residential+ c. scattered building,_ d. Densely built -up_ 12. Threats to 33tat r s a. Nona kuoso_ b. Private develop"At�_ a. Zoning_ d. Public Works Protect— s. vandalla t. Other_ 17. Gatos of enclosed photograph(s) �- NOTYt The fclloslag (Itess 14-19) are for structures only. It. Prlaary exterior bulldlog uterlals a. Stone__ b Stick O. Stucco__ d. Adobe_ e. Wood— f. Other 1S. is the Structures a. on its original site? Is. 9oved? e. Belson"? is. year of Initial Cosstmatloet This Drte 1es A. ractual b. gstiasted 17. Arablt "t (19 ksoss)s 18. Builder (it known ): 19. Belated Tintursss a. Nara b. Carriage bon" ' a. Outhouse d. Shad(a) e. Tamil Gard"(s) f. lliadalil�_ g, gatertower /tankbouas Is. Otbar 1. Mane 11GNIFICANCE 20. Briefly state historical ud /or architectural isportanee (Include date events, and persons aeeorlgted with the 241J when kno")t This rear bu the loft sadaa Pon 111 the eosin eLi )t Ana R1rer besln. It has 69111 a Saturn Of the coarunitr for as In 1 a, 00 raeru itr Ms erlat e It is exce }dlnoly rim. 21 Yale the" of the historic resource: (check only coals a. Architecture b. Arts a Leisure I Natural settlny Economies /lodustriall, d. Govern"nt •. 8xploratlon /Settlemont__ _ f Military _~ g Religion h. SOClal /Education 22 Sourcest List books, documents, surveya, personal Interviews, and their detest n,neho ttiv,nd, rIR• at, 2CsLA,,HOr, 20. Date form prepared Aerll. 1988 By (news): Arlene 8inkt Address,____ City: Ztpt_ Phone: __ Organization, City of Rancho Ceeaeonna 33 � Commissioner Banks moved that there be a mom nt at the northern end of the southern section of wall on Hlllsidq� nd encourage the use of rocs as much as possible and direct staff to cone back with Possible, demarkations of the southern end of' mm the southern wall. Caissione vote: i Billings seconded the rntion.�The motion was carried by the followln AYES: COM9IISSION BANKS, BILLINGS, ARNER, COOPER, SCFMIDT NOES: comissSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: cwf,SSIONERS: STA`1M. HASKYITZ / -- carried NEW BUSINESS I POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION FOR THE SEDGE BOG ECOLOGICAL proposa o esigna e e sag gong pea og mown as thr Sedge Bog Ecological Preserve at Day Canyon as a Point of Historic Interest Arlene Banks presented the staff report Commissioner Arner moved to recommend to City Council the approval of Point of Interest Designation for the Sedge Bog Ecological Preserve et Day Canyon. Commissioner Banks seconded the motion. The motion wits carried by the following vote: AYES: cOM1ISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STAMM, HASKYITZ -- carried J JUNE 2, 1988 SCHEDULED LAN UBLIC HEARINGS Information received by the /Co9,wf5sion. COMMISSIONER BUSINESS Larry Henderson. ekplained the creatio^ of a Work Prugram for the Historic Preservation Commission. Larry Wderson clarified other items regarding the 809 area. HPC MINUTES 36' '`J- MAY !•, :988 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -08 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF APPROVAL OFFTHE SEDGE BOG ECOL,OGICALL PRESERVE LOCATED AT DAY CANYON, RANCHO CUCMgNGA, AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST advertised HPuD is hearing lstorconsider all tlConn Commsissi n hpraposed Pa duly Historic Interest Designation. SECTION 1: The Rancho rucamonga Historic Preservation Commission hereby mare—s—IFermiowing findings: I. The Sedge Bog is rare. 2. The Sedge dog IS of great age 3 The Sedge Bog is an established fi.ture of the community. 4 The Sedge Bog is of educational and cultural, as yell as ecological value to the community. S. Designation of the Sedge Bog is in the spirit of the Mission of Vie Historic Preservation Commission and of the intent of the Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance. SECTION 2: Designation of a Point of Historic Interest is exempt from CEQA ( r T Te 19, Section 15308) NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of the Bog as a Point of Historic Interest to the City Council. APil10VEO AND ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF MAY, 1988. ' HISTO'RCG R,EiERVA 0 CO"ISSI N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ��tTue a moan AYES: COMYISSIONERS• ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCHMIOT NOES: COHfISSIONENS: NONE ABSENT* CCHHISSIONERS: STAM1, HASKVITZ 3 ✓ uvuliuble to our nn•ulbcra, the Clsniher Ins available it medical health pnt"- the Rnestlnli• r a afford- k'rt co'oOO ,TCC h no c Comm n Rao but o[ �. tore ntemlx•r• Bill GL1aS� , now W- iiitg to the Sir. -.arrardlno County Central Credit Union which oRcrs virtually every son of financial service simply by opening un a saving, amount of 25 do]". Your Chamber of Cauhrcree is a good Infonnallun "rusoome- let the rreldeuls and bushhessas of the clImmrmily. The Kanrho Cum. monga Chamber of Commerce is striving to keep up with the pace [lie members arc selling 'or slie- cess and advancement The Hoard or Directors we•Iennies you to vigil the Chambe, office located at 730x5 Carnellon, Salle 190• at any lure The staff Is always willing to assist .oil and act as your resouree Inr the business community and elly as a whole HISTORY People first lived In the Rancho Cucamonga area In the 12th cen• fury The ScrranoShoshoneln. diuns, later called Gobrichnos, lived adjacent to ••clene-gas•- (ma.shes) and named the valley Cucamonga (sandy place). Coca• m inga and flay Creeks were then large streams lined with sycamore. willow anJ oak Trees and provided a major source of life for the res'- derns The Gabrichnos malmainn: a hunling %athering economy from three waters filled with .rout. turtles,, waterfowl and cattails. Other major food sources were at tints, (ground Into a pastel and Lirge and small game. Including prong horned antelope, rabbits and big hunted sheep Open areas at land supported cuablal sige st nib oaks and large rxpansce of t haparral Tile List remaming t ien•ga Is tw4ted ill Day CLn yon I lie Gabnchnos commacd an Isolaled existents until 1774. when the first white travelers Franciscan padres and soldiers led by Sltanieh explorer Juan ILndUla de Anra mate to the Cucamonga Villey While camping briefly In 8 area, dr An:a spoiled belles. and llama [lie bile "Los Osos. • later to be called iiear Catch For years [he Gabnellnus lived (xace- fully at Ihejunclion of the Old Slumsh Trull Rxlweeu Common ga and Cajon Pass] and El Camino Real ( —the King s Paid- — the two from the Mission to San liter. nardlno) These mid-i guided ex. plorers, mountain men, prospector pack- lmins. Mormon wagons, and the twice- weekly sngecoaches to and from San flernaMlno. 1n 1039, ul the end of the Mlis• stun em, the new Mexican govern• men[ granted Tlburelo Tap W, u Mlc•xlaan cillicn. 13.000 acres of land that he called the CUUUnnngi Rancho Until then the land was RESOLUTION NO. D O ~ 7 D7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUIR:IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AFMVIHG THE SEDGE BOG ECOLOGICAL PRESERVE AS A POINT OF HIS1iMiIC INTEREST LOCATED AT DAY CANYON - APH: 225- 150 -I5 AN0 225 - 150 -15 WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Cowoisslon has hold a hearing to consider all coaaeents an the proposed Point of Historic Interest and issued Resolution No. BB -08 recowinding to this City CCouncil that said designation be appioved. WHEREAS, the City Council has received and raviewod all input from the Historic Preservation Ccwaission regarding said designation. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby makes the following fl- ndings: 1. The Sedge Bog is rare. 2. The Sedge Bet is of great age. 3. The Sedge Bog is an established feature of the community. 4. The Sedge Boy is of educational and cultural as well as ecological value to the coamunity. S. Designation of the Sedge Bog 1s in the spirit of the oisslon of the Historic Preservation Comission and of the intent of the Historic Praservation Coweission Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve the designation of the Sedge Bog Preserve at Day Canyon as a Point of 111storic Interest 3SY� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRON: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE SCHOWALTER ROCK PILE LOCATED 660 AND -I9EWIlt^0 rUSIORIG INTEREST— I. RECOM ENOATION• The Historic Preservation Commission recommends emh�Rocc Resolution owalter kPile, located 660 feet east of Hermosa between Vista Grove and Wilson, as Point of Historic Interest 'J'. II BACKGROUND' The Schowalter Rock Pile was brought to the attention o e in March, 1988, by Js ^. Dunlap, a Rancho Cucamonga resident who lives nearby and reported tl,!t dismantling of the wail - like Pile. Mrs. Dunlap pointed out the i4ortance of the rock pile and the meaning of its loss to the comnunity and to future generations who will not have an understanding of the roots of their City if reminders such as these are removed. III HISTORIC PRESERVATIOW COMMISSION ACTION. The Historic Preservation aam ss on rec sEWfr o came ack with inforottion and a reco:mendation. The May 5, 1988 staff report is attached. The Historic Preservation Commission voted to recommend designation of the entire length of the pile as a Point of Historic Interest and directed staff to explore the possibility of a monument of mortared rocks with an explanatory plaque. At its May 5, 1988 meeting, the Historic Preservation Cortmission recommended: 1) designation of the entire wall as a Point of Histor'- Interest and 2) that the developer of Tentative Tract 138 ?7 wnich borders on the southern portion of the Schowalter Rock Pile, place a pyramidal monument at Hillside to cormemorate the wall It was also recommended that rocks from the Schowalter wall be `ncorporated into the development of the tract as much as possible. Tnis would be .eviewed by the Planning Commission at the time of Development Review. 3-5�s CITY COUKIL STAFF REPORT RE: SCHONALTER ROCK PILE June 15, 1988 Page 2 A letter to the developer of already approved Tentative Tracts 13644 and 13877 requesting the developer to provide a similar monument in appropriate locations will be sent subsequent to the City Council's approval of the desidnatfon. AResp-- lltte 88:A8:ko Attachments: Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report and Resolution Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 36a _ i T -T -T-� - 1-F-T-I ' 1 I � I I I ' 7 I r-i �-r - -•- I -'t I I � I FT I (YAEAMTi , 1 T OCHOWALTIK MOCK .L'.I - i -�'� I 1 I ; / <`` f� ( ♦♦ ,�- - -- �J .1 -`ILi - -I'�(X dAMT�r_ _ L J -1/�- 7 I I I fCKOWALTIM MOCK ►KI II I 7 Y 1 _ i�TdA�T 1�e 7 ke- RESOLUTION 110. 88 -06 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION cOmrssION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF POINT OF HISTCRIC INTEREST "J" TO DESIGNATE THE SCHOWALTER ROCK PILE LOCATED BETWEEJ VISTA GROVE AND WILSON, 660 FEET EAST CF HERMOSA, RANCHO CUCAMON'GA, AS POINT OF HISTOR::C INTEREST "J" WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation commission had held a hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Point of Historic Interest "J". SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission hereby ma esl Ve following findings: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: I. The proposed Point of Historic Interest is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life 2. The proposed Point of Historic Interest was connected with someone renowned, important, or local personality. 3. The proposed Point of Historic Interest is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. B Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1 The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed Point of Historic Landmark are unusual or significant or uniquely effective. C Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1 llie proposed Point of Historic Interest in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community or c ty. (Ord. ?0 S9, 1979) SECTION 2: Designation of a Point of Historic Interest is exempt from CEQ r c e 19, Section 15308) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of Point of Historic Interest "d" to the City Council APPAO D Ah'D ADOP E THIS 7TH AY OF APRIL, 1988. BY o b bcftmidt, Chairman AYES COMMISSIONERS BANKS, ARNER, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCHMIDT, STAMM, HA,4(VIT2 NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE G. UPDATE ON NIGHT BLOOMING CEREU Arlene Ranks stated that the C Council did designate the Night Blooming Cereus as a Historic dmwrk. Commissioner Cooper state hat this Night Blooming Cereus is located on the property of the f1 house on Red Hill. N. UPDATE WINERY E UIQ PMEHT Arlene Bank presented update on the Colombero Winery Equipment. She stated t Mr. Clark can transport the equipment without the help of City s f and it will temporarily be housed with him until the Chaffey GarcXHouse is ready. WIN BUSINESS I HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST "J" - SCHOVALTER ROCK PILC - A proposal to designate the nowa er oc ee per on that runs north -south for 1,000 feet from the Vista Grove right -of- way to the north side of Hillside Road, approximately 600 feet east of Hermosa Avenue as Historic Point of Interest "J ". Arlene Banks presented the staff report. Larry Henderson added that they went to the site with the Building Official and determine if the part that was already removed constitute a hazard He determined that there would be liability problems retaining the wall because of the dry construction Commissioner Banks questioned if the snutherly portion could be saved. Larry Henderson responded by indicating the structural make -up is not done as well and therefore may not be worth retention. Cnairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. 'ane Dunlap, resident of Rancho Cucamonga, stated the wall has been Pretty much demolished and no reed to discuss it any further, but that perhaps a portion could be saved or one of the large rocks used and put a p'uque or It Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. Commissioner Stamm stated she liked the idea of a rock with a plaque on 1t. Larry Henderson stated that maybe where the street locations intersect with where the rock would have been, some kind of rock - mounded with cement with a plaque would be appropriate. The Commi%s'on concurred with the idea R 3 HPC MINUTES -8• �V APRIL 7, 1988 L Commissioner Banks moved to approve the Schowalter Rock Pile as Historic Point of Interest `J" and direct staff to return back to the Commission with more informaticn on the monumentatlon. Commissioner Arner seconded the motion. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: BANKS, ARNER, BILLINGS, COOPER, SCHMIDT. STAMi. HASKVITZ NOES: LANE ABSENT: NONE J. MAY S. 1980 Srurma r nr r lwnulnv ,✓.........._ .__._ Arlene Banks presented the staff report, indicating that 7656 Archibald 1s already a landmark and the next o on the 11st would be used if there were no objections. The Commission concurred with CommT loner Cooper's request to hear the Buchanan House on Foothill at the n rt public hearing. COWISSION BUSINESS K. 808 SCHHIUT - SES UIC NTENIIIAL SUBCOMHITTEE Chairman Schmidt reported bays to the Commission on the subcommittee meetings He stated that rrt'�kkhyye //,Comralssion should start thinking about how th1 kinonaaboutcatheana�llodatlonatOf any Ton ye5received that fromthey the Sesquicentennial activities Commissioner Arner sugges d the plaque far the Schowalter Rock Pile. Commissioner Haskvltz sated he would like to see the money t* go to additional education. tangible,ner Banks cor,hrred, but she felt It should be something more tangible, etc grove q trees, preservation of some structure. Larry Henderson suggested maybe setting an emergency loan pro rau for structures which a•e'going to be demolished that would enable them to be moved or stored c•• a temporary basis He stated another sug,gestlon would be further hiln with the Chaffey Garcia House. Chairman Schmidt announced that on April 13 or April 14, there will be a meeting at the Community Center on Arrow and Archibald in regards to the Sesquicentennial, and any organization 1s invited tc discuss this event. Arlene Banks stateo sha would like the Commission's consensus on a mandatory plaque it a residence that has been designated as a landmark She stp'led she would l ke to be able to tell the people that they do not have (, have one. HPC MINUTES a g_� APRIL 7, 1988 L DATE: April 1, 1988 TO: CITY OF RANCHO CuCAMONGA STA; 7 REPORT OUunf0 � z tv:7 I Chairman and Memoers of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: POINT OF INTEREST "J" _CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal es gna a OWa r ocx a por on that runs north-south for 1 000 feet from the vista Grove right -cf -way to the north side of Hillside Road, approximately 660 feet east of Hermosa Avenue as Historic Point of Inte -est "J" ACTION REQUESTED: That the Historic Preservation Conalssion reGond to the city designnaating the Schow lateroRockI Pi ea located south of three solution Grove Avenue as Historic of Interest iW. The Comuissionfmay want to direct staff to consider designation of the entire wall down to Nilson Aserue as a Historic Point of Interest or it mAY want stiff to consider the southerly portion of the wall as a pote:,tial local landmark II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A Location: The rock pile runs on the edge of and through T 13621. It s 1660 feet 6cast and Hermosa Tentative gnrtionraextends south of Hillside This loner section may be -.onsilered at a future s:eeting All together, the wall is approximately 2000 feet long. The portion new being concidervd 1s ap,,,•oxlmately 1000 feet in length. _ B General Plan and Zoninn Be si nations: The tltc and all a acen proper es are esfgna eory Low Residential on the General Plan and Development District Mays (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). r Site Characteristics. The tong, wide pile or wall of rocks I � o��ai vision aah mLke� sd it Is a few feethi and the rocks are piled up haphazardly, vhIle in other places, the rocks and stones are so carefully placed that the resulting wall resembles dry masonry ITEM I HPC STAFF REPORT POINT OF IPTEREs7 'J April 7, 1988 Pace 2 Windrows run along side the rocks and perpendicular to it. There is a break to allow vehicles to pass from one field to enother. Part of the wall has been dismantled and hauled away in preparation for a new subdivision. IT ANALYSIS: A. Back round: The rock pile /wail came to the attention of staff tit en a ocal resident, Jane Dunlap, alerted the Historic Preservation Commission that bulldozers were taking out a portion. Tho wall was being dismantled to make way for a newly Approved subdivision, Tentative Tract No. 13644. Vhen City staff checkzd on the matter, it was learned that the final grading permit had not yet been issued. The bulldozing was halted, but as soon as the developer fulfilled all the necessary requirements, he was allowed to continue clearing the property. The wall was not included in the Historic Resources Survey. The History of Alta Loma 1880 -1980 shows pictu -es of the rocks being piled and the lock p e as it looked when completed. From the pictures, it appears that the outer portion of the wall was carefully piled with the large rocks and boulders to hold a filling of smaller roan which were dumped in. The book says that Jacob Schowalter, his son, Paul, and Hr. A.K. Toes began clearing land and piling rocks in 1913 pith the help of Hindu and Russian crews, and later with the help of Fm11 Toews. Mr. Schowatter thought the rocks might be worth money some day. 8 Issues: North of Hillside, the wall stradC.es tiro approved Te—nUnve Tracts, with a mid - section of the wall not yet subdivided. The wall, if it were to remain, would be in the back yards of single family lots, entirely on private property Even 1f the wail had been a designated landmark, it questionable whether requiring homeowners to keep it on their property would have been advisable. But, because these tracts wire approved without any conditions related to preserving the wail, there is no mechanism that the City has available to preservi. 't now. Perhaps the subdivision could have been designed to l.+ve the rocks as part of a trail, but a qualified engineer would gave had to determine whether the pile was stable and that a dangerous condition did not exist. C. Reason for Des1 nation: There seem to be ample reasons for es gna ng a wa or rock elle a Historic Landmar %. It is literally a 'mark on the land and can be seen from Cucamonga eak. It was assembled in 1913 by the well known Schowal!sr HPC STAFF REPORT POINT OF INTERE:. 'J- April 7, 1986 Page 3 family (►hose bone is a Historic Landmark) for a purpose associated with the roots of this area, to clear fields for planting. However, although it is too late to designate it as a landmark, it can still be made a Historic Point of Interest. By designating this portion a Historic Point of Interest, the rock pile location is recognized for historical purposes, but is not subject to protective provisions applicable to landmarks. Perhaps remnants could then be incorporated as subdivision walls and a rock monument placed near a public street that explains the location and history of the wall. The southern portion was not included in this application to leave open the possibility of designating it a Landmark. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Criteria from the Historic Preservation urainance app ca a to the Schowalter Rock Pile are as follows: A Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. 4. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned, important, or local personality 5. The proposed landmark is connected vith a business or use which was once common but is now rare. B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1. The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed landmark are unusual or significant or uniquely effective. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community or city. (Ord. 70 $9, 1979) D Environment Assessment: Designation of a Historic Point of interest s exemp u er CEQA (Article 19 Section 15308). v CORRESPONDENCE Since the recommended action is merely to recognize fxistenco of a Historic Point of Interest and since there are no consequences for owners in terms of future City review over and aoove whatever review they would otherwise have to undergo, there is no need for formal public notice The owners and .r.terestcd parties have been sent this staff report. HPC STAFF REPORT POINT OF YNTEREST 'J- April 7, 1988 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomends that the Historic Preservation amm ss on recommend to the City Council that they adopt a Resolution designating the Schowatter Rock Pile Historic Paint of Interest 'J' because it meets the criteria established in the Ordinance. Furthermore, staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Comsission direct staff to explore the possibility of the southern portion of the wall being designated a Landmark, to inquire of the engineers on the matter or the stability and safety Of the wall, to look into the possibility of its being included in the trail system, and to research what funds might be available for a monume nt identification. If the Historic Preservation Commission thinks it likely that the southern portion of the will would be more appropriately designated a Historic Point of Interest rather than a Landmark, Staff recommends amending the Resolution and incorporating the southern portion with this Historic Point of Interest. RespectfullLy suhnttted, a Laffy Henderson Senior Planner LN:AB:ko Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Situ Location Map Exhibit 'B' - Page from History of Alta Loma Exhibit 'C' - Page from nse a a� Exhibit V - Page from g ver a ountain Robort Frost Poem Photographs of Rock Pile Historic Points of Interest Application LI CITY LIMITS Of PAMCMO CUCA40MCA VICINITY MAP CITY OF R. ACHO CUC-kNnN(;A Rack Wa -M she LocsUon (tiomlharn NU TH HISTORIC PRESERVATION F-XHIB[T COMMISSION- 9� /r SCALE - Fro, The History of Alta Lona California 1480 -1780 +arrha ,aloes toebe wi['h Maze toebe F T TTn qs and da'lace Stoebe, Published by BAS Publishing :o 1931 SCI IOWALTBR "iV The Mennonite Sanitarium as It looked when dedicated In 1919, with the citrus grove planted around It oil end Mr, J." 0, I Schu %altcr t.line (n C,ihfurnla in I•,• from IlaWead Kansas and the% hoed first In I pland %o they could hr near r.. Istentinnrte Church to %htth Ih,o belonged Jacob Schn %alter .Into lit, .o u, Lune had four children Paul, I It,., Emil and fdna In about I911 St, Scho %alter bought 1811 acre, ut land the corner of Ilermu,a and IIdI,Wc loamosa Including 10 acres un the west corner and the rest east of Her n,•.,, both north and south of 11,11,Ide No , haomg a good uell dug in the land t assure plenll, of outer the fanulo (here w Inc u1 the house that i „ standing oacant at the time on the northeast turner the Sthu%alter, gaoc the III a,rc, ,,n ,i, northwest corner h1 (he Mennonite Church for thur ntbenulo,n ,,uuLUnnn 11% I'll 1 the lia:0 .ni , Sanitarium budding had been completed the Iand iroound it .leered and dedualtnn tcren otov, u, held on February ?h NI.; htr A K Tne %, %hit hoed nearby planted and oared for the turn, et •o on the Sanitarium land and during all the year, the Sanitarium operated all kilter %a, supplied t n and to the grove on the land from !sir Schuunher, %ell In I'll 1, \Ir Stl.o %alter %uh the help of hn tun ISu l and of sofr lucu, and %uh cn•%, •i Ihndu and Ru,van worker, ajrtrJ clearing his large akrcage east of Hermosa of ,agebrn,h and i ., I, This %ail a tremendous task and later f not lieu, helped sou he remenlhcr, mat 'sir Nth000.. h,, uanted the rooks poled up neatly because he (ho,ncln then might he %urth money some duo Wht it o it look dc% I from Cucamonga peak. the Schu%al(er rook pile %11101 n aI least a quarter ul a nil, L•ot and S to 25 fee high look, like a short piece of pitied htghuas n all be .ecn tud,n "hell son 'ho, Piling the rocks The rock pile when completed 4t * , Thousands n/ Curanwnyn "Potatoes' were sfacAed by farmers In the 1800s Cucamonga' Granite "Potatoes, Though rabbits held lightly to "first place' as the local nuisance. a close second was run by Cucamonga 'Potatoes." rhis was file name given to the numerous rocks found In virtually every piece of property In the area There Is a story concerning the way in which these rocks wnie into being. As the tale goes. a glacier stuck its nose out of a cozy shelter In Cucamonga Canyon and hao it badly singed by a desert-born Santa Ana wind. In Its death thross. the glacier spawned the familiar "potatoes.' These stones. rang. ing In size from that of eggs to automobiles. were carefully Planted In rich soil ove. a wide area. most of which Is now Alta Loma and Uplan.i As one travels through the area today. large stacks of potatoes" can be seen Stacks which farmers and ranchers spent huurs. d. ys. weeks.an,r months piling up CITY OF r fLNj: RANCHO CL'CA'MON(;A TfrLE-- HISTORIC PRESERVATTION LXHIBrT COMMISSION SCALE t IIE UIUNr Tlgrl tilt, I,,} nIF%L%EUF 11.1(1 A ( „Iml 91mulm to (ant,,., W ry,t rra,, J yourr Jour WM ,I.-m• wA6 wh.h nnrr I -NW Nrw Engl+nd fold. now gn�wn nr,w 6 From The Sense of Place, Fritz Steele, CBI Publishing Co. 1981 5/� i J RESOLUTION NO. - OF RANCHO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THEYy CU �NGA,IF CALIFORNIA J' RECOMMENDING IGNATE APTHEOZHOWALTER ROCK i' PILE LOCATED oc(WEEN VISTA GROVE AND WILSON, 660 FEET EAST OF HERMOSA, RANCHO CUCAYOWA, AS POINT OF HISTORIC `r INTEREST "J" WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Coamtssion had held a hearing to 'a consider all convents on the proposed Point of Historic Interest 'J" and issued Resolution No. 88 -06 recommending to this City Council that said Point r of Historic Interest Designation be approved. the Historic WHEREAS, tservCity Council lssion rre9ardingndsaidiepointllof nHistoric Interest. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby Makes the r following n ngs: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: I res Pot Interest is particularly repreentativeOf an historical period, tptye, region, or way of life. 2. soomeoneprenowned. important, lor locale personality. ected with roosed point of business or which was once Coommonsbutsisonowcrare,.l� a The B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: methods used in I the proposedipol it aHistoric engineering are Landmark or significant or uniquely effective. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: of I The proposed Point visualtfeaturelof tue neighborhood, community or city. (Ord. 70 59, 1S79) SECTION 2:19.DSti91on11n of a Point of Historic Interest is exempt from CEO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that th• Rancho Cucamonga "City Council do ter Rock Pile. nd epprovat of Point of Historic Interest J for , ,trA 37.5 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer r I V40 SUBJECT: Haven Avenue North of Foothill Boulevard - Determination o e r vewa �eea��r�xnen or - - ew s ve o en an staff request or y ounc IT rec on concern ng the realignment of a driveway onto Haven Avenue from t.-e Terra Vista Town Center Shopping Center, located between Foothill Boulevard and Town Center Drive. APR 1077- 421 -05 I RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council deny the requaas — ie driveway realignment. II. ABSTRACT: Staff is requesting City Council direction as to whether or nor• a proposed realignment of a driveway onto Haven Avenue from the Terra Vista Town Center Shopping Center is acceptable prior to scheduling the modification (CUP 88 -12) for a Planning Commission Hearing (ExtAbit 080). Ill. BACKGROUND: Terra Vista Town Center Shopping Center was approved by- Tie— FTaining Commission on December 9, 1 ^8, The approval of the protect included specific locations for dr •sys and street locations as shown on the approved site plan (Exhi... °C"). With Haven Avenue being a major north -south arterial, it was extremely important that tr0fic conflicts be at a minimum. This.. concern for insuring the integrity of Haven Avenue as the most important north -south arterial street in the City is expressed in the General Plan (Exhibit "D "). In keeping with this General PIZ, direction, the Virginia Dare and the Brunswick Development on ':ie west side of Haven Avenue were required to use a shared acarss aliqned with Town Center Drive. This intersection will be signalized for the benefit of the Virginia Dare, Brunswick Development and Terra Vista Town Center Shopping Centers. Any additional driveways on Ha•von Avenue must be "right -1n" and "right- CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 88-12 - '.ewis Development Company June 15, 1988 Page 2 out' only with no median breaks. Tnis concept was developed to limit the obstruction of through traffic flow on Haven Avenue and to allow the street the capacity to function as an important traffic artery. The original master plan for the commercial center portion of Terra Vista (Ezhitit "E "), as well as the Terra Vista Plan itself (Exhibit 'F "), was consistent with the Haven Avenue concept. As the exhibits show, the commercial center extended along Haven Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Town Center Drive, thus utilizing Town Center Drive as a major entrance from Haven Avenue. This is the ideal layout to take full advantage of the well - placed signalized intersections of Town Center/Haven and Foothill /Aspen as major entries. An additional signal- protected entry is available o. Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue. When the site plan for the shopping center was presented for City review, the Town Center Drive intersection no longer provided directly to te -C "owlth ExhibitbE" showsohowcthisocritical change In the site plan seriously reduces the ability of Town Center Drive to function as an access to 'Town Center ". This access restriction, self - imposed by the Lewis Company by its site planning preferences, resulted in a request, late in the approval process, for a median break at the main Haven Avenue driveway, about halfway between Foothill Boulevard and Town Center Drive. The request was denied, as was a similar request made in the recent past by the operators of the Virginia Dare Center. It should be noted here also that, because no median break was contemplated by anyone throughout most of the shopping center planning and approval process, the main Haven Avenue entrance was located so as to serve the site plan to an optimum manner and be an acceptable distance from Foothill Boulevard. This location did not align with the Virginia Dare driveway across the street, as such an alignment was of no importance due to the median island. A short time ago, a request was made for a change in the location of the main Haven Avenue entrance. The proposed new location for the entrance is directly across from the Virginia Dare Center entrance. 3 77 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Cl',' 48-12 - ,cwis Development Co%pany June '.5, 1488 Page 3 TV ANALYSIS: Staff Is concerned that Lewis Development will be sese— citing the stage for a future median island break with the Proposed realignment of the driveway. As previously described above, the proposed driveway location would align Wth the existing driveway for the Virginia Dare Center. A median island Creak at this location would be at only one - eighth of a m11: (660 feet) from the next opening instead of the standard one - quarter mile separatiun (1300 feet). The General Plan, as adopted by the City Council, restricts median island breaks to approximately one- quarter mite spacings (1300 feet) on the major divided arterl "'s. This critical spacing re4 i ement 1s the result of extensive traffic studies done for the preparation of the General Plan and the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is indicated in those studies and documents as being particularly important and critical on Haven Avenue. These docunents also stress the importance of maintaining the capacity of the Foothill -Haven intersection. This will be possible only through keeping other traffic conflicts as far away from the intersection as 1s possible and feasible. Right- turn -only driveways "re the most interference that can be tolerated to the critical area within 1000 -1200 feet of Foothill Boulevard, where four lanes of traffic on northbound Haven Avenue must be squeezed back to three. A traffic signal within this merging area would result in congestion extending back through the Foothill Boulevard intersection and would be a scurce of increased accidents. In addition, the City 1s completing an extensive median Island be- tification project along Haven Avenue. The median openings havt already been constructed consistent with the City's General Plan. Any additional median openings would reduce the remaining median to a 4 -foot wide rack strip -1th one small pocket of vegetation near Town Center Drive. An unsolicited traffic report from Lewis Dave lopm it Company, some- time ago, stated that the additional median island break would have no significant effect an the ability to coordinate signal operation along Haven Avenue. This report, however, only examined the aspect of signal coordination and failed to address the equally important effects on the merging traffic flows and potential Increase in accidents. A median opening would also requlri the removal of approximately 1200 feet of recently Installed median landscaping, which Is approximately 54% of the full width portion between FootBiil Boulevard and Town Center Jrive (Exhibit "G "). 37�f -r ,F Cn COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 88-12 - Lewis Development Company Jane 15, 1988 Page 4 <r If Lewis Development Company feels it is necessary to realign the driveway, staff would recommend relocating the "S' curve to the ii "uth (Exhibit "H") This would give the drivers a positive sight •t' distance as they enter from Haven Avenue, rather than the limited sight• distance shown on the Lewis proposal. The City has been consistent in its planning and construction of median openings on Haven Avenue. Staff is opposed to any additional median openings in this or any other section of Haven Avenue where median islands have been planned or Lonstructed. These medians are consistent with the design standards promulgated by the Traffic Engineering Profession as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, The State Oepa- traent of Transportation (CalTrans) ana The National Highway Research Board (IIHRB). Resnt�� tt d , / %s`_ _ RHO • S Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit •A•) Proposed Driveway (Exhibit "B ") Approved Site Plan (Exhibit "C•) General Plan Excerpt (Exhibit •D•) Original Master Plan (Exhibit "E" Terra vista Plan (Exhibit "F`) Median Opening (Exhibit "G') Alternate Driveway (Exh;alt •H') Note: Staff received another Traffic Report from 4estern Properties on Wednesday afternoon, June 8, 1988, and was unable to review it prior to this writing. However, staff will be able to address the report by the City Council Meeting of June 15, 1988. 379 W d CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIM!oN Mm Y %kv MENT Tma. VICINITY MAR xxmm ts A" \W Q EXIST I N(, DRIVEwN / z w 7 Q Lo ING IFI w -- 25' -�ij I A -2 MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENOINEERIPO DMSION KIOSK n H H 1rM. CUP 8B -12 T=. PROPOSED CRIVEWAY y W O ® Q -�ij I A -2 MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENOINEERIPO DMSION KIOSK n H H 1rM. CUP 8B -12 T=. PROPOSED CRIVEWAY y i� i v © �- aa a— „,,,d,. FROPOSED .,ROEr o -- - -V TW.ATFJ � JCR.2 El CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOON �w Ia rroL. CUP BS -12 Tn7.E: APPROVED SITE PLHN ZXKEBrn e„ W one point for 300 feel of frontage or one point per parcel with less than 300 feet of frontage It Is the Intent of the pol- icy to establish a minimum 300 foot spac- ing between driveways. - Combined access to arterials between adjacent properties shall be encouraged wherever possible to reduce the number of encroachments Access points shall wherever possible be Located a minimum of too feet from the oack of curb returns at intersections on 4 lane or wider highways Where otherwise compatible with this policy, access shall be located opposite existing or planned points on the oppo- site side of the street CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JENDINEERING DIVISION Special Impact Area - In addition to the controls outlined In Planning Commission Resolution No. 78 -29, restriction to median Island breaks and left turn access shall be limited to approximately quarter mile spacings on the following major divided arterials* Haven Avenue, Foothill Boule- vard, Milliken Avenue, and Fourth Street o Because of the ever changing nature of transportation, it is essential to manage the transportation system to Insure effic- lent operation and to see that the coals of the Circulation Element are being met Results of the traffic model indicate that even when the multimodal transportation goals are met, several sensitive areas will remain to be ealt with hese areas as delineated on the-- irculation Plan are - The reglonaJ center area of Foolhill Boulevard and the Devote Freeway, and - the Intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. Prior t3 significant development within these special Impact areas detailed analysis of potential traffi: constraint¢ should be Milk 0& t88 f IGNMENT 4TnX. CIENERAL. PLAN EXCERPT APP:_ " p,l n � � i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DAM ON Om ow Terra Vista LM ce. �vrvam ulww M IAN FJr11?IOT.�����e -Ie �.vvv ul wouao cvrnn mrRv ao�.oar vawm corm. vvuvlw v..eaa OIp IM r- .na.vu.w.n�vva�r w�mnswm.vly. mv.m+mc +vvnw �E ew,nw vaou ems• n-c NO ww Or SN ASSOCUtES rv%rL --- T1 O SOO 1000 1500 Scale N:NI CUP 2B -12 N MO&ORNEWAY RE•AUSNMENT- TM . 'TERRA V ISTA PLAN .• If ) XHUBM. ,g HAVEN HAVEN VIW,INIA CARE CENTER BRUNSWICK CENTE/i TERRANISTA I MAJOR 1 TOWN CENTER PRIVATE MALLET) 56RVICE SHOPPIN6 CENTER DIY• DRWY EXISTING MEDIAN ISLAND ON HAVEN AVE. VIRGINIA DARE CENTER 60UNSWICk CNTER DRWV E , Ly' r TERRA VISTA I LL? TOWN CENTER- ' SHOPPING C.ENTEP, P Iv TAE U II 0 oRwv I mum L F (TAU,ET 1 I A PROPOSEII MEDIANYSLAND OPENING ON HAVEN AVE pip S M& MFA /l�ni 06 r�IN6 Z� - ;gym ., t K w it i z� w� IQ i A -Z D.clvewAv Z IALTERNATfi wI 4I 1 I i� .D � FINANCIAL aej CENTER MAJOR -I PROPOSED TARG U J -- cup as -iz. N rmL. DRIVEWAY A.EA'J&AMENT % '17nZ. ALTERNATE DRIVEWAY _ p�� 11 H °1 L.faiDil' F ,r 1226 Topaz Alta Lra, C4 91701 June 15, 1988 Rancho Cucamonga City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CO, 91:39 .VA Re: Proposad historic landmark Ilk designation of 7165 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucawnga. APNf.27- 131 -23 Dear Commission Hembers- Kindly review the attached documentation verifying my forml objection to the reconiendation recently made by the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission that M house located at 7165 Etiwanda Avenue be declared a historic landmark. If the Rancho Cucamonga City Council approves this recommendation and in doing so prevents me from moving this house, it will cause me considerable m financial loss. I respectfully request that the council members reject this recommendation Sincerely, Robert C Flocker I N .i 'I I ffIT f�T H LH_7fl IEEH CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA reu om, � att, a,.ae a�w. �+• ����. nul mbiui May 25, 1988 Mr. Robert C. Flocker t 6226 Topaz Rancho Cucamonga CA 91701 Y � Dear Mr. Flocker; In response to your letter of May 6, it is the policy of the Historic Preservatlm Commission to work cooperatively with owners to protect, preserve and enhance historic properties in the City. As City Staff, we desire to be of service to owners of these properties. Your property clearly arets the criteria in the Historic Preservation Ordinance for landmark designation. It was hoped that the material given to you about the Etiwanda Specific Plan, easerentu, income tax credits, code provisions permitting adaptive reuse of landmark residences, and other programs would help to clarify that it could be an advantage to have the OFishor House' designated a landmark. On the matter of relocation, as you know, designation does not rule out relocation but relocation plans would have to be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. The City and the Commission would, of course, prefer a historic house to be kept in its original location, but that is not always feasible. The Building Department stated that a permit for roving a non - designated house through the streets is required, but no further permit is rtquired if a house is relocated outside the city. The requirements of the jurisdiction in which the house is relocated must be complied with. However, according to our Historic Preservation Ordinance Section 224100H, it is unlawful for a person to carry out or cause a material change on a proposed landmark until final action of the City Council, denying the proposed designation, is taken. The consideration of designating your property, - -' (the Fisher House), it expected to be on the City Council agenda of June 15, 196+. We would like to reemphasize provision in the Etiwanda Specific Plar. that 'notable' existing structures 'sl.All be incorporated into the design of new developments wherever possible. On lots of 1 acre or more, these structures shall not be included in density calculations, and will not reduce the number of new dwellings permitted.' In other words, by combining lots to meet the 1 acre criterion, the developer can have whatever number of units are allowed, plus the 'extra' historic house. Yo. Nbrc,a N. nm — Idhrr 9W orm. nme4 L Smm CL162LD4u n P2=4 L WA& Lo M.Wm Robert C. (locker Fisher House May 25, 1998 Page 7 Landagrk status would also provide the advantage of the use of the Historic Building Code which allows less costly rehabilitation. We appreciate your desire that the house be preserved and andersta'-�d that your objections to designation do not man that you consider it unworthy of such recognition. We hope we can work together with you to arrive at a satisfactory solution. You will be sent a copy of the Staff Report when it is prepared for the City Council meting. Please call Ne if you have arty questions. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLAANNNINN.G. D-IVISI�ON Arlene Banks Associate Planner AB:mlg cc: Larry Henderson Brad Buller Otto Kroutil ti i 6226 Topaz Alta Loma, CA 91701 may 6, 1988 Arlene A. Banks, Assoctate Planner The City of Rancho Cucamonga 5320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Arlene: I am disappointed that in spite of your repeated personal assurances to at of your intent (and that of the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Comm, Sion) to 'cooperate with property owners', the commission made their ecoomendation last sight concerning ay property, without regard to ab' Ishes. No I am concerned about another representation which you made to me, bota in writing and orally, assuring me that the city cannot and veil not prevent my house from being moved off mD roperty and relocated either within or outside the city once a sale of ad house is complete. The reason for this concern is the conflicting and uncertain statement made last night by your associate. Mr. Larry Henderson, that 'A permit is required to rove the house either inside or outside the city." Please provide me with verification in writing, signed by an apppropriate officer of the city stating that The City of Rancho Cucamonga wi11 not attempt to interfere with the immediate pending sale ano relocation of cIr house now located at 7165 ctiwanda Avenue. I will then show this assurance letter to my buyer in order to complete the sale of my house. Sincerely, �LI'L9� Robert C. Flocker cc: Eric S Jacobsan, Esq. V I; 6226 Topaz Alta Loma, CA 91701 may 5, 1988 Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission The City of Rancho Wammnga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917x0 Re: Hntice of public hearing concerning proposed historic landmark designation of 7165 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga. APH 1227- 131 -23 Dear Commission Members: This letter is to update my letter of May 2, 1988. I woald like to go on record again as being opposed to the designation of the Fisher house, (7165 Etiwanda Avenue), as an historic landmark. My frmily has owned this proorrty for over 30 yeaks. I have received 2 offers to purchase the house t.. oe moved and expect others in the next 4 weeks. I will make a eecision within the next month as to which offer to accept. Any action by the Historic Preservation Comm�-sion that prevents or restricts me from selling and moving the house from aV property will create a financial loss to me. Sincerely, q - - \ � C . qL'�A' Robert C Flocker ,1 -r I x c. toe Ana Caaestsi9o9.7sao May 4, 1988 Robnrt Flocker 6236 Topaz Avenue Alta Lama, CA 91701 JTF:kd !I Hear Bob, i' In order to verify your continuing two -year effort to sell your house on Ettwanda Avenuo to be moved onto another site, I will be happy to appear at a Rancho Cucamonga City Council meeting to state the Y following fact: c < During Idl and August of 1986, I prepared a written presentation for AT &T ', New York proposing that they purchase your house and pay the cos. of movlo� It to another location for restt3ration. My asso dates and 1 O submitted an outilue for a proposed television commercial to be produced zbowing that AT &T cares about preservhu historical interest. and renovating¢ structures of While this plan was rejected based upon other prior AT &T advertising commitments, dlecussioas were held with them througbmd August. I believe this will prove your intent to have the house relocated, while respecting its potential historical sigtdficance to the community. Please let me know If I can help. H rep,, ds, amen T. Flocker toducor Wide World of Flying JTF:kd !I d� ) g C 6226 Topaz Alta Low, CA 91701 May 2, 1988 Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Coanisslon The City of Rancho Cu.awnga 9320 Baseline Road i Rar.cho Cucamonga, CA 91730 gv; r Re: Notice of public hearing concarning proposed historic teadanrk designation of 7165 Etiranda Avenue, Rancho x Cucaconga. APNl227- 131 -23 Y, Dear Commission Members: I an the owner of that certain structure known as the Fisher House, 7165 Etiwanda Avenue. Please take notice that since July of 1966, I have offered to appropriate parties the above structure to be moved to another site. L If the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to purchase and move the structure to another location (As you know, the Garcia House was roved directly across the street). I will be happy to offer this building to the city at a greatly reduced price. While I share the commission's concern for seeking out and reviewing potential structures for preservation, I hereby object to any effort by thu commission to designate this house as an historic landmark if such designation would prevent its relocation. Sincerely, I x"A Robert C. Flocker aw or RANclio CUCAMONGA 1 27, 1988 Robert Fla.. ".or 6226 Topaz Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 I i T tw orev tu.mm. Ruda L>r.�w. t:W� flrn 0141Wla5l as As a larnpdmark will toke phlacenon Wy the Pr Vesh hope ithat theustaffpreport, and from theeEtlwanoe pecificfoP larOfandathe11Historic Preservation onaOrdinance were helpful. Last year, the City undertook a survey of its historic resources in order to document the structures, sites, landscapes, and distr'cts that are of at 7166 historic, nda architectural, Avnueasullisted or as engineering poten aln landmark Your becausep of its Victorian architecture and its association with the history of Ettwanda. It is the City's wish to preserve, protect and enhance its historic resources, since there is such that is new and so little that remains from earlier times. The heritage of the communities of Ran ho Cucamonga one important an the City's image and identity, PP Avenueawhich the Et Wanda heritage. Specific Plan highlightsiforyhistoric preservation. As City staff, we feel a sense of respect for our City's historic buildings and City'saintggentionwIs desire to be of service to cause difficulties these in formally AVe manyinthOLL the sandscontribution homes through utrCalifornia andotheanati�onnthat are Our experience is that such recognition is a point of pride and often means enhanced property values rather then a problem. The City intends to work in a cooperative spirit with owners of landmarks in the event that sdvlceion alter exterior of processes in orderitonprotecctithe historic value. If locurethdesignation s please call me 1861. We hope you wilconwith of your property alandmark Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION Arlene Danks . Associate Planner AB:ko C. ell WS M,w1e Dew&L. Stour C'h&). BAueta F..'h 1. Wdght lau,m a/. Waumun r : «.Y... 11`00 W.A. w. INHOYYO TOf "ll 8 (1 TrMwlyYwL lNr. (ir��X•W IM'�IN As Bros flL L /t Or�rA01lA \ YfVYRy� 1L10 Iw ♦ M L1W n { <VIaI N.tM u•I' r An MLTA LOM• I4N IIry M INAMe lO l f afa�VCRt run n 1 rrY. n.0 1 1ar..S L W w[. tit. Ex•cullVe MNYrIr 1-� NrllrY r ;NI4rw N . 1 +1r m ry r1Y,aw NlNnl YnYra wrrllrWawrNw. ItL Ni'Mmw 110.7100 i own W. t•/ • 714/3,54.0780_ 8 « u NY M Ir ,Lf'urt IY1rO n [ lwN .IaW nr 6 V Dr• u F•Nr w 1 rDfM \ YfVYRy� 1L10 Iw ♦ M L1W N•.. Yw4NY u aM . aN w YL Npi4YNMw « N.tM u•I' r IN �IyY11'ry l 11. /rYv�1 'ra TIL\VY R eQ 1 �IN Ti bXI`ip1171' l i1. i 1rYy •Ir�aL.r• �l W M " M1 M ��. Y atN �.. 7Ww aELS . Y a 11i"J Y01L r.rn10 �wL •COLTON� b..[•IY. ruW NIrwY1 1 'N,T -:f, MNYrIr 1-� NrllrY r ;NI4rw N . 1 +1r m ry r1Y,aw NlNnl YnYra wrrllrWawrNw. ItL Ni'Mmw 110.7100 i ., IurlL is r• u. Mr ..:wl' Y:Y< ILN. LN1YY $1S91950 M s- OLTIrSMWT 11 Yy'' II.. jIN •C NY IINN•NYN1Vpr1 1 • 1 Y 1 tN 11 I r{1 a�I In� 1• VV MYOO N I1T..%ARD N-11111.41. RrtlYrPrw OUT Or TNe ORDINARY NRWLII IRO %aN.M e: *j- <• LMR %, 70 0 TS *UPLAND* LYf.L 1\J1Y; IW\L�1�Y�I1,1�1• =-- .YI,N.IM.I,II�I�''� 1 Y• :M•1°""Y«. "MM tioY% .IYIN<YIII "1'w"• MRW Nidi11 RED iy11(gCCMA4y IOVnNatfY.Yl ROUITYLOANS. Case to N% •ONTARIO ALT�,aMA r4r111.Y1 rNY NM YW` 1111A WINNBR w4 Nww 1r•<'\i'iw.w a--WlL {WLL Y011<YOR IYYY Ta1L1111 Y r M[Y. uYIXU N W t 1 YIA ` !'7� eNR NOMN rata Rl Mf1 rallaw4nlM -Ir N11Y M1 NYI Y N[NN Yr.-n[«a11N YL MN NIN1r WM WY lu pr «NL11NIrYW Oa t. <r IrNY.w Y MLNR wrw MNW<wn . r(YL NN111I1 1NL Y IIN wl. YiY 1 .•r1 \rvin 117.7071 ONTARIO w[« raral ,Iw A Y[w•IaY M uY Nnb4b r11w M.r. ar YllwY Y 91bN11 an tlm• 1[.30fW70... RIALTO Yn SUSAN O'C"•NNO SUSAN O•CONNO R ."•"irpr'" T p 1YIi1YP.nn a REAL ESTATE REAL ESTATE 714 /687 -LOAN �17L O O J _ w•eev _ 6n•6w • 714/3,54.0780_ *HOME BUYERS• ***FREE*** 4 r N u W.1 ry ,• 1'T ..... i'n. Ni.Yi11'Iri. 6tlw"RY L.1 Y rl 17"H•ti1 Wr, go LIII of r watt for 1111 DY Owner with AIa. 0 �i£�iSi�` 'WJ'- ..w, (Nj U.ril l 1 �rr,Y rYY i+1 Y1"liriw' RRAL •ITATa LOAN{ {1100 /yp OrI O11YTIVG \Ya {0•x11111 PflGtr. Paan1 npmlirn. Call 980.6167 gas aVY1116,/10 IY wIp• na F,y SwlO arrrOWNER Y 1. \N 4 s= r at" R, 1ttY1�Ol'Yea1 i , V Nr Nil[YL MtNY Y• LIMIw. /N•. Y Ypw. IILNI. XMrI fww44111r IWNY C M141� 11 Yy'' II.. jIN •C NY IINN•NYN1Vpr1 1 • 1 Y 1 tN 11 I r{1 a�I In� 1• VV MYOO N I1T..%ARD N-11111.41. ' ' l �W I.1r •X0111"11111, Q A. Y. ANI M. • WYr M �.IM MIY TY.TN11 YalIW1. �IIY.L tlroa.w un r•. X[. iMY1j'NtlL Lotsw NO119MbIMrL IEr Watno MI VY11M OND i L�+MO "' J %M[ -� F..O <u-. ��1a `Wl 1 �1t•' N"1111NYlNN L 1 •MOYIILOMT LYO YO"Ta LO" INIYa• rwl piw. Y•YM�«r r 4s M1N uMtp Nod•1 00-IT-YOURSELF IDEAS A READER SERVICE OF THIS NEWSPAPER N 1N1 rrY.o1D"4rMNUwn � muwa,r Iu"rou .,.....Ya.I DuatNUn"R u• aNYr" I....1 I .... IA1u r... Y.fY.w:r Yl.N< MIL VYYL WIrYM. OPEN HOUSE 11004:00 ' r VNWI rWN IIN IIN Mp. rra.Wlw, b..•4.r.« GREAT BUYI InINNaIN Iran M<rM N tYL Np1. - Nlpr .Nr:N r I. ioiib:btl w'"'I YWL yw1 6716 Moonstone Moonstone 1N.fYKNYrYIVNrI. 1YrtKNL TRESTLE OESx • " B' O1NtID1 6 i ' 4Nn:t.bw•'IrM 4;YYL WY1 YL 1 C M141� InII NrM14 IY•�yN N. II I, IWN n1' _1 CiI<Y IINM 1 .IIY •I<N V LLIL L.NrrwM • I.1,, - .Nl arwuu- IIts,me 011N01'W# n, IP 's -Qrtla 1 YY1M i t VV W Y wN"MIaNr.��ry IIiNInIYnlrAX�/rIw A. Y. ANI M. • WYr M �.IM MIY TY.TN11 YalIW1. �IIY.L tlroa.w un r•. X[. iMY1j'NtlL Lotsw NO119MbIMrL IEr Watno MI VY11M OND i L�+MO "' J %M[ -� F..O <u-. ��1a `Wl 1 �1t•' L 1 AIIa Loma Spa<lal 1«IYp 1 r.1N YY Y•�� N«i • «r IY�Y. N IM. Yw a nY w. NO OVALIPYINO a MN. Maur i1 4i Y.r YI mrN.0Y1.<rIe you Wo.staper p4010t1ul Von i$' [:4. 1*;y` 1 P GAL atTATaLOANS vl•- tWU- .',I.�W «Y�4,rX .� �..•��fi.�N.Yw� "r'!;,.� -�•w„ rarer PARK «Van plllrN. 1 wn I \ -. f'lY w.lalal limp w un wIN Van 0tIs IA Standard MOrtaa 1 a e I ADULT MOBILE PieirDio' •rrrnlndwl HOME PARK 910.7100 9 .� S�IM`N,W ylDn VNWI rWN IIN IIN Mp. rra.Wlw, b..•4.r.« GREAT BUYI InINNaIN Iran M<rM N tYL Np1. L4w.« `_UId e1NVNof 1U \.. Wr«al• I.w YXF tw.wNL <rl.w w ;1,1, N•r •M 1[.• 1 iw.r K• I r141•.� N11 •WW «Inl rb1 TRESTLE OESx O1NtID1 r Y•M WIY 4M. Y� nw1 -�i YNN 1uI� MLY NL«L wL411 W a YN1b -1 Y W •0N•Ni b I 1wG [NYrYL 11110 D OOL Intl rW nla6<IYn .0,k InII NrM14 IY•�yN N. II I, IWN n1' _1 CiI<Y IINM 1 .IIY •I<N V LLIL L.NrrwM .Nl arwuu- IIts,me 011N01'W# n, IP 's -Qrtla _ WrIL YT L<uXtDwt LwI prw .w. I.L 4rN II. IIW W NIT rINM •n iMY1j'NtlL Lotsw NO119MbIMrL IEr Watno MI VY11M OND ,<• pN wNYN.< N NYC. o e 1 rW L Y. tD rrNpLn •arriuN<L <w i:.'i: I�NIwwNIiiN .6mvp W&II.Stan e" nl9 NM11tw- wrlV�NiXiX <D r0f banr.00.ul wrw %r r.m N.IIW mrN.0Y1.<rIe you Wo.staper p4010t1ul Von Ir41 •nYN11w w.aN1YYYrPARK1' And a;M11 MIAMI, 411 NOwNnp iMAconc4sts MIAMI, W4"4Y[IIOe "r'!;,.� -�•w„ rarer PARK «Van plllrN. 1 wn w.lalal limp w un wIN Van 0tIs IA "... «.I NII _ n,I,IwN11, pry yam;,^ Alta Lama M. •N�4W WINN mI OWI I:o':vN.<"'Zir Pool Home - - Di .Pdw ryRTMLO.R WRAKA � 1yiAR 1.1 "IaLM� Mwl 1L�<d11d 10 D 0431 TItl14 D11L M1D k n Ea<iir•��•D �µ MI. OHN BARAKAT .•, w.[.yN'IMr:A:w "° °..YIY.LW r.Xw ✓w"LNr 010 sour ow 0112 pan<Iroi USE $1.00 PIK ARON•"01TAINS .IN 411. SAID <w,w -"r. r Y .a.Y/ Val. LYf1 N •• bru nuoaxlwun b.L LW,• r01r 1%1 I fIW 700 W PNNUI Vm wr4. CA 1117 OGFERBD lnt.lr UrLAMD aL001!Aw "II"Nrwl 7808: THE REST MY71. <waw, 1 1L'R r. N X S•nd to. Re • R'i'd � YI�K.y "•� .�r.Y. r. ^'•ry #... `Y 0 t :•5'• N i} •e �i .. o v op e•f vo v v •�.. b e d b 8i ° v .ni ` O Q n ? � Gp c N � � � in n r Q m •^Ui � •^Ui f N d C 'J q�q 44 $o� �Q,• 8 8 `•� �+ d `•• Q O d d • 8 d l[1 d d Y N � > > > O m N N u n � n > > � O• C 4 u u O ti ti •O •ni 8 {> •-•C •-Ce r-ci •Ci aV N �aJ 2 W O U O d ••� N O D O CI D D °� 9 t C b D d N O U ~ f uNN� -• N C •-• ~ •y M •-• •-• C H C Yf •-• V .�-• N f O O 4 V Y V y 1 Y d yy dL C G M O N O V O �• N N O O p p O n i� l(f d 0 o LL r �v C u u m S vi ^a IA ti . • •�• •-c. •�. M n L 0 z d c b T 4 a a _C 5ON L N y L C c •A 8 p S yp� S d Y Y1 Op N C W C .!1-• b OI 1•i N N C L �• N •ci •C+ C N •-I n p p C N Vf Lan OI p yyy C . N W N N� 6 JIW C S L 9 9 U N O {QNi� ` M N N Y N C U L ��N I + U !♦ N N C � 6y ~� It".•' L L D po pN Cpp d W b N ` t,J N O W �+ O V °•nC U d O W H •ti � i c.1LL S V1 � r U•b"• LL U U {{{yJ OaJ IyA Y III °••d yNy N ?. d Y V U G US d y [r% 6 O [lf �� •.• OI N C 6 6• b y� NTY bOli � =5 �y MIWO P' .• f��W MO� pi.• C1 -) Sp U.O Vl OJ M 6V1 N G 6sN 46• 4S ti� .po"J N A J H N HI tF lA b n m q C. •~•I .N-1 •• _ a i t CITY OF FMCIIO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM T0: City Council Attached are some additional items retch contain copies of photographs. Since photos do not reproduce Hell from a copy. the depaIU --nt made copies for you from the original photo. ITEM G1. HISTORIC LAHUJARK DESIGNATION OF 6797 HELLMAN AVENUE APN 202- 061 -12 i L 11 DZIE and MARSHALL Mr and Mrs. Gilbert Dzie came to boamosa In 1911 from Woonsocket, South Dakota, they bought the 40-acre ranch and the large house which had been built by Isaac W bird in 1885 on the cost side of licllman Avenue south of 19th Street. Mr Dzie's father find been a Polish count whose full name was Dricwanowski, when he came to the United States in 1874, he settled in Wisconsin where Gilbert wns born, and the name was changed to Dzie. When Gilbert married Mary Stanley, they mo%cd to Woonsocket, South Dakota• where they went into the hotel business and also owned farntlmid Gilbert and Mary Dzle had one daughter. Florence, who becane a concert pianist; In 1901 Florence married Edward Marshall. When the Dzie's moved to the ranch in Iuomosa, the Marshalls, with their two children. Stanley and Mary, came with them. The '✓ y�O .1�' • not, •e to foamosa was pleoly big for both families; (tie Marshalls had ''7 rho: own apartment on one side of the house while Mr end Mrs. r" 0 uzie lived on the other side. There wore barns and o coach house in �'yr back of the house, loo. The Afarshalts did not stay on tine cinch all Rs9s the lime; in 1912 they rented a house in Los Angeles so their youngest child, Phyllk, could be born at the Good Samaritan Hospital, and In 1915 they were living in Pasadena for a time end then they bought a ranch on the corner of 20th and Euclid in Upland, but they did spend enough time in foamosa oo Alta Loma so they are ,rte 4: �• J Fp remembered. Cora 'ledges Addison, who lived just across Hellman Avenue, remember% 1f" v f playing with Mary Marshall when they were sh` both very young as well as later flazel Sloebe 7 Billings remembers riding the street car up od'3�" •v ' / r Euclid Avenue from high school with Lorraine Mary Marshall and Core Hedges Jones and Delta Ledig one day soon after a on Ilia donkey, with Phyllis heavy rain they found they couldn't get across Marshall In front, the wash or 191h Street so they went back down Mr. end Mrs to Upland where they called home. Pretty soon Marshall Mr Marshall crime to Upland to get them and on ilia way hornc his car stalled near Red Ilill, but they all finally made it, thanks to Mr Marshall. The Marshall family moved to Minneapolis about 1916• but Mr Mnrshall died there in 1918 and Florence then brought her three children back to Alto Lonna where they lived with her parents for about two years. Florence Marshall sold the ranch on 20th and Euclid in Upland right away but later she bought another ranch on Euclid Avenue north of 20th Street and they went there to five. All the time she was in Alta Lomn and Upland, Mrs Mnrshall gave piano lessons• and later she taught piano at Chaffey High School two days a week The Bzle house as II looks today; picture taken from the side as there Oro too many trees In front. This house was built by Isaac W. Lord In 18115, the oldest house still standing except possibly the Kughon, James, Thorpe cemonl• block house on the carrier of Hellman and Banyan; we have no data for that. •77• Mr and Mrs. Dzie enjoyed life in foamosa and Alta Loma• they made runny friends• they belonged to the Aloha Club, and Mrs. Dzic often played bridge in the afternoons with Mrs. Thorpe, Mrs. Belden and Mrs. • HIS' AIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIC _ LANDMARK SURVEY Addraoe:�l97 HELLAAAN AP�Zaa. 1.�2 v; uu&u ur rno[o 1-1� of Page_ LJH3 ITEM G2 HISTOR:O LMDMARK DESIGNATION OF 7165 ETIUANOA AVENUE - APN 227- 131-23. 0 • • r From Etlaanda The First 100 Years, September 17,1902 NORTON MIU llomn 1161&) All tlmtl,N Vl IMJt. I" Nm wn lnr Yxvun M Ih ,.naMUrJ Fx lNe IMmr Trip pNnrbl Mlwl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMoj%A HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ITEND TrluI EXHIBIT: -SCALE, NO 111 2' 1t ITEM G3 HISTORIC POUR OF INTEREST DESIMATI0G OF THE SEDGE BGG AT DAY CANYON _ APN 225- 051 -15, 16. I°y .t+ rr Ji� L• �\1 o? �e .T E�• C •f I t UPPER GAY CREEK AREA City of Rancho Cucamonga ® JUNE 18, 1987 N SEDGE �CX�� \ ti ft It rKr , • • e �. ''}�' �� 14' 1'� �• �{'y • 1j�� �� � ,� 4l �ajx�'• S�P1r^i4 �'�il. r•.' .1 rI F-t-� u.. f s V polio Ik ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Peat=" Sot 36,3, Edrsnda, CA 91739 June le, 1988 Mayor Stout and Members of the City Council, In 1882 the Chaffey Brothers (who were friends of Alexander Oraham Bell) completed a telephone line from Etlwanda to San Bernardino, the longost :n the world at the Lima. On February 1, 1906 a public telephone was installed at the Froat brothers Store in Etlwanda, and on Juno 2, 1907 the Hone Telephone Company was f0rmeddas aTmutual cooperative eocompanwa by the citizens of Fisher home at 7165 Etiwanda Company located in the Norton - her daughter Nellie operated the �tManuel rSystemruntilPthea1930ao. At that time the Homo Telephone Company sold to Associated Telephone Cum; / and a small brick central switching station was built (and is ill standing) on Victoria Avonuo. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has a unique opportunity to NortonVPleherm ho use it' segment its atieo tc the local history and itc association with the national development of telephone service, the significance of the -structure spreads beyond the boundaries of our City. The structure Se a strong candidate in its original location for State and /or National landmark. status. Furthermore, due to the proximity of three other City landmarks to the west and north,* the Norton- Fiahor house, as a landmark, would complement and enhance the City's preservation policy. For those reacono the Directors of the Etiwanda Historical Society have RRSOLVED, That the action of the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission recommendit.g the Norton - Fisher house for landmark status is whale- heartedly andorsed end the City Council is urged to adopt their reecotmneidation. RRoop'e�ctfulllyy SSlibmitted, h_�d�i ryeCnlllne, Plea dent Chaffey - Garcia House - directly west Etiwanda Congregational Church - directly northwest Pac.fic Electric Railr-ad Station - directly north All donatlone of money or materials are tax deductible