The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988/07/20 - Agenda PacketM v: ' *mr _. _.. .. r:5.1 "��1�'i 4� ;,n 'etc.+• .. .e: ..-- .,-c '�aC„' . , 3 CITY COUNCIL 3 AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays — 7:30 p.m. July 20, 1988 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga ♦e♦ City Councilmembers Dennis L Stout, bfeta. Pamela J. Wright, md) -P-Te. Deborah N. Brawn, C-- 9,e—%" Charles J. Buquet, ee uAmr�te• Jeffrey King, ee.+9+..e.• •t• Lauren M. Wasserman, crn trews James Markman, ao 4n Y Beverly A. At.thelet, crry ekrt city oinc .. 989.1851 boat Park 980.7145 0 w 9 v t5 City Council Agevia a • t July 20, 1188 PAGE 1 All items submitted for the City Couaeil Agenda suet be in writing. Tle deadline for eabaittiug theta items is 5800 o.s. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. She City Clark's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO OBDKK 1. fledge of Allegiance to Flag. 2. Boll Callt Brow _, Buquat _, Stout King _, and Wright 1. A1gO0Wmicurs/pUS.UMAnm 1. Presentation of ten year service pin to John Ysrtio, Associate Civil Knginearl and Katby Milani, .Police Clerk. 2. Presentation by the Saldy View Building Industry Association to tha City of Rancho Cucamonga of ■ donation to the Citizen Patrol Program. C. COESM CALKIDAR She following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and nom- controvaratal. They will he acted upon by the Council at ona time without discussion. Any item my be removed by a Couneilmember or mesbar of the aadfenee for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: June 1, Jane 13, and July 6, 1988. 2. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 7-6 and 1 -13 and -.I _ Payroll ending 7 -7 for the total amount of 02,119,542.52. 3. Aleonolie Beverage License Applications fort Bun Dong Kim and Jung Wan Kim for Off -Sale General 11 License, Foothill Liquors, 8161 W. Foothill Boulevard, Peter S. DeJager for Off -Sala Beer and Wine License, 12 Arrow Plaza Market, 9755 Arrow Highway, /B. si 1 PAGE City Council Agenda July 20, 1988 Chong Rim aad Hussy Lam for Off -8a13 Beer and Wine 13 License, She Lunch Stop, 9631 Business Center Drive, suite C. ika 2yo Dm and Sunny Hyung Ds for Off -Sale Beer and Wine 14 License, Quality Market, 10120 25th Street. 4. Approval to execute contracts fort A. Computer maintenance with Westak Cor,putor Services 16 (0088 -102), Redlands Computerland (tD88 -103), CalComp (COBS -104), Tektronix (CO88 -105), Prim Computer (COSS -106) for the total amount of $57,738.50 to be funded from contract services Account Ho. 33 -4130- 6028. B. Victoria Street Improvement Project from Etiwauds 30 Avenue to East Avenue awarded to Bob Britton, Incorporated (0088 -107), for the amount of $159,500 ($144,979.85 plus 102 contingency) to be funded from Gas Tax 2107 fund - Account Ho. 09- 4637 -8701. 5. Approval to award the bid and execute the Professiontl Services Agreements fort A. Construction surveying and staking of Etivanda Storm, 31 Drain System, Line 2 -1, Phase I Improvement Project located vest of 1 -15, north of Victoria Street from the Victoria Basin to north of Highland Avenue and future Route 30 freeway, awarded to Hackett and Kraemer, Ineorporated (0088 -108), for the amount of $11,858 to be funded from Drainage Fund - Account No. 19-4637 -8154. B. Construction surveying and staking for the Hillside 32 Road Storm Drain and Street Improvement Project ' located from Malachite Avenue to Archibald Avenue awarded to Associated Engineers, Inc. (CO88 -109), for the amount of $10,530 to ba funded from System Development Fund, Account Ho. 22- 4637 -8748 and city- wide Drainage Fund, Account Ho. 23- 46374602. 6. Approval to accept Reel Property Improvement Contract 33 and Lion Agreement for DR 87 -59, located on the northwest corner of Fourth Street and Center Avenue, submitted by Haventata Business Center II. 4 k � l }y� F City Council Agenda PAGE July 20, 1988 3 W� 7fyr_ s RESOLUTION NO. 88-436 34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGIWNCAr CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTI iO A REAL ?ROPERTr IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN !. ACRIENENT FROM HAVENCATE BUSINESS CEHMP. II :. AND AUTUORIZINC THE MAYOR AND CITY CLARK TO BICH THE SAM • J. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 36 Security for DR 87 -60# located on the vast aide of Red Oak Street# between Arrow Route and Jersey Boulavardr !;• submitted by Martin J. Jaaka, Incorporated. RESOLUTION N0. 88-457 77 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY f Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW R0. 87-60 T' S. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extensions fort A. Tract 12511 located on 19th Street between Beryl 39 Street and Hallman Avenue, submitted by Nordic Development. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -458 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12577 B. Tract 11606 -2 located on the north side of Victoria 41 Avenue east of Haven Avenue submitted by Grupe - Development. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -459 42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ' IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND i IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11606 -2 C. Tract 12832 located on the north aide of Victoria 43 Park Lana vast of Victoria Windrows Loop# submitted by William Lyon Company. r ,r s ±` a� CiIF Council Agenda July 20, 1988 1141-459y PAGE a 4 RESOLUTION N0. 88-460 44 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONG&, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IIPROVBNENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12832 9. Approval to accept Improvements, Release Bonder and file a Notice of Completion for$ A. Tracts 12642 and 12935 -44 interceptor levee and 45 channel located on the southeast corner of Enchanter and Highland Avenues. Releases Street Performance Bond $ 840000 Accepts Street Maintenance Bond $ 8,400 RESOLUTION N0. 88-461 46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TSB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 12642 AND 12935 -14 INTERWT01 LEVEE AND CabOAL AND AUTHORIZING T9E FILING OF A NOTICE OF COHPLETIOH TOP THE WORK B. DR 84 -12 located on the northacst corner of Arrov 48 HighvaF and Etivands Avenue. Releases Street Performance Bond $430,000 RESOLUTION NO. 88-462 50 A RESOLUTION OF TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGI, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DH 84 -12 AND -- AUTHORIZING SUE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C. Tract 13021 located on the southwest corner of Etivenda 51 and highland Avenues. Releases Street Parformanee Bond $932,000 Accepts Street Maintenance Bond $ 93,200 -y n PAGE City Council Agenda July 20, 1988 1 5 •r. BBSOLVrIOH NO. 88 -463 52 A RESOLU7TION 01 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY - OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING 'IHB PUBLIC IMP ".OPEMSNTS FOR TRACT 13027 AND AUTHORIZING THE VILINC OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION D. Tract 13052 located on Base Line Read vest of Btivanda 54 Avenue. Sue Line Off On Imcrvmnts Sits Site Release: Performance Bonds 895,000 190 000 1,012,000 Acceptt Guarantee Bonds 8 9,500 19,000 101,200 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -464 55 A RESOLUTION OY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TIM PUBLIC IMOVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13052 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE Or COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 10. Approval os Nap, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement Security fort A. Tract 13722 located on the northvest corner of 57 Victoria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue subm.tted by The Villism Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 88-465 58 A RESOLUTION OF TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMEROMONT AGREEM 11T, IMPROVEMEUT SECURITY, AED FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13722 B. Parcel Hap 11222 (DR 87 -53), located on the southeast 60 corner of Sixth Street and Buffalo Avenue submitted by Oltmans Investment Company. " f City Council A,4aads July 2u, 1989 � PAGE r 6 .. 'i RESOLUTION U0. 88-466 61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIM CITY OF RANCHO 4- UCAMOtIG, CALIFORNIA, APPBDVII7G PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11222 (DR 81- 53)(TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO. 11222), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY 11. Approval to accect the traffic signals at the 63 intersection of Haven Avon= at 6th Street, Haven Avenue at Jartey Boulevard, and Base Line Road at Spruce Street as :omplata, release bonds, approve the final contract amount of $218,984, and authorise the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. RES06JTION NO. 88-467 64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOBG, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TUB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TNd TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THB INTERSECTIONS OF HAVEN AVENUE AT 619 RTREZT, HAVEN AVENUE AT JERSEY BOULEVARD, AND BASE LINE ROAD AT SPRUCE STREET, AYD AUTNORIZINO T2E FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE 12. Approval to accept the Base Line Betutifdcation project 66 as complete, release bonds, approve the final contract amount of 445,990 and authorise the City Engineer to file a Notice of Coopletion. RESCLUTIOH NO. 88-468 67 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY -- OF RANCHO CUCAMONUI, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE BASE LI'n BEAUTIFICATION PRCJECT END AUTHORIZING THE FILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 13. Approjal to accept the Rehabilitation of various city 69 streets south of Foothill Boulevard and east of Archibald Avenue as comolnte, release bond,, approve the final contract amount of $225,340.01, and authorise the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. FA's H � as as r City Council Agenda W 20, 1988 PAGE 7" d, 7 71 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -469 70 A RESOLUTION OP THE "CITY Omen Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVEMENTS FOR THE REHABILITATION OF VARIOUS CITY STCEETS OMM OP FOMILL BOULEVARD AND EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND AUTHORISING TUB FILING Of A BOTICE Or COMPLETIM FOR TEE WORE 14. Approval of • Environmental Initial Study Parts I and 71 II for the posed Ninth - Street Widening and Paveeent Rehabilitation Project between Baker Avenue and Vineyard Avenue and issuance of a Categorical Exemption RE90LUfION N0. 88-470 72 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EHVTRONMChM INITIAL SIan AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL E2EHPTION FOIL THE PROPOSED NINTH STREET WIDENING AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT 15. Approval of a Consultant Selection Procedure for 86 federally funded projects through the Federal Highway Adr.inistration. RBSOLUfIOH NO. 88-471 87 A RESOLUTION OF TIM CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS THROUGH THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION 16. Approval to advertise a Notice Inviting Bids fors A. City Corporation Yard Phase I Project located at 9153 92 Ninth Street to be funded from Capital Resurve- Accocnt No. 25 -4285 -7043. RESOLUTION NO. 88-472 93 A RESOLUTION 07 THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIYICATION5 ?OR THE CITY CORPORATION YARD PROJECT PHASE I LOCATED AT E . 'r r City Council Agenda July 20, 1988 9153 NINTH STREET IN SAID CITY AND ADTHORIBING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ClXSE TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS B. Construction of HalYmaa Avenue Storm Drain Improvement Project from Moore Vista Street to Cucamonga Storm Drain to be funded from Drainage Facilities Fund - Account No. 23 -0637 -8763. RBSOLPrIOH N0, 88 -073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFD ITG OP RANCHO CUCAMWGA, CALIFORNIA, PLANS AND SPNCIFICAIIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF HSLLNAN AVENUE STORM DRAIN IMPROVSMSNY PROJECT FROM MONTE VISTA STREET TO CUCAMONCA STORM DRAIN IN IT TV�DV E AND DIRECTING TE CITY CLER , O ADVERTISE RECIVE BIDS 17, Approval of the Article 8 Transportation Funds Claim for and aamount o 1 it $ he ity Manager to sign @aid Claim in the L8, replacement in all Landscape Maintenance Districts t Districts lac for 1987 -08 financial statements, 19. Approval to pay an additional repayment of loan to the Redovelopmut Agency in the amount of 8321,442.22 for 1987 -88. 20. Approval of the Annual Statement of Investmnut Policy for %a City. 21. Set public hearing for August 17, 19882 A. An appeal by Golden West Equity Properties of the Jura 22, 1988 Planning Commiaeion requirement fors (L) full vidth improvements to 8th Street; (2) undergrounding of existing overhead utilities; and (3) is -lieu fees for future undergrounding of existing overhead railroad communicatioa lines for Tentative Parcel MAP 10981 located east of Hallman Avenue batman 7th and 80 tracts. ■ PAGE c "C 98 i n d 99 106 107 108 109 -1,10- r s h C� 'A 8 dg�d7 w � 0, PACE � City Council Agenda afo y 4�3 July 20, 1988 9 e S. An appeal by Levis Homes of the June 22, 1988 111 Planning Commission requirement for a median Island within Terra Vista Parkway between Church Street and Town Center Drive for Parcel Map No. 9897 located at the •outhaast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. D. COKSE1r ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public heariaga at the time of first reading. Second readiags are expected to be routine and non- nmtroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 88 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to change Development District designat ons as they currently exist to Victoria Planned Community (V.P.C.) for eleven areas within the Victoria Plamted Community - APE 227 -011-8 then 117 227 -091-4, 45, 567 227 - 411 -757 227 -091-9, 26, 49, 501 227 -091 -18 ttru 22, 25, 437 227- 111 -1, 33, 381 227- 171 -191 227- 161 -10, 24, 25 and 227- 111 -27, 30 and 227 - 171 -217 227 - 211 -7, 28, 397 229 -021 -537 227- 211 -3, 30 ORDINANCE NO. 361 (second reading) 111A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPHENr DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 88 -02, A RRQUESI TO CHANGE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS AS THEY CURRENTLY EXIST, TO VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY (VPC) FOIL ELEVEN -- - ARPAS NraIN THE VICrONtIA PLAHIiED COMMUNITY AREA 2. ENVIRONMSNYAL ASSESSMENT AND VICWRIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 88 -02 - CIYY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA - An amendment to annex eleven areas into the Victoria Planned Community - APH 227 011 -08 through 117 227 -091 - 04, 45, 567 227- 411 -751 227 -091 -09, 26, 49, 501 227 -091 - 18 through 22, 25, 437 227 - lit -01, 33, 387 227 -171 -191 227- 161 -10, 24, 257 227 - 111 -27, 307 227 -171 -211 227 -211- 07, 28, 397 229 -021 -587 and 227 - 211 -03, 30. 8 dg�d7 w � 0, 1 PAGE ,a City Council Agenda ' Sad July 20, 1988 10 ORDINANCE 00. 362 (second reading) 117 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO, CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLA}06D COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 88 -02, AN AMENDMENT TO ANNEX ELEVEN (11) AREAS WITHIN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY AREA TO THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMKUNITY 3. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMERT FOR CLARIFICATION OY DRAINAGE PEES RELATIVE TO ANNEXATIONS TO VICTORIA PLANNED CyOWUMITY - An amendment of Subsection 13.08.040B of the RRanchoCucamooga Municipal Code pertaining to the Application of storm drainage fees w properties annexed to the Victoria Specific Plan ORDINANCE NO. 363 (second reading) 121 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOOD CUCAMORCA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUBSECTION 13.08.040B OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO STORM DRAINAGE vp <a R. ADVERTISED PUBLIC WAR CS The following items have been advertised and /or posted as public hearings a required by law. The chair will open the mating td raealvw public testimony. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PE8141T 87- 122 41 - ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DLSTRICr - An appeal of the Planning Comaissfen s decision denying the development of a school district facility consisting of a 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16,075 square loot '• - transportation - maintenance building o0 5.25 acres of land in the low residential district (2-4 duelling units per acre), located on the east aide of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - APH 202- 041 -01 and 42. Associated with the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of three mature trees. (continued from 4 -20-88 meeting). 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 154 AMENDMENr 88 -06 PRBEONE - THRRANCE MSLCHe& - A request Co prexone a 96 acre portion of the San Bernardino County unincorporated araA (for prexoning purposes) to Low 1 n '3 PAGE City Council Arend, July 20, 1988 11 ` ty Residential (2-4 duelling unite per acre) located e northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street rDauLty 225 - 071 -65. NMRNrAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ACIfBSMENr 88- AANCE MSLCHEB - A request to approve a Development ment for development and anueiation of a 96 acre u of San Bernardino County unincorporated area (for tion purposes) located at the northwest corner of da Avenue and 24th Street - APH 225 -011-65. M< ORDINANCE NO 364 (first reading) 176 AN ORDINANCE OF TDB CIrT COUNCIL OF TIE CITY OF • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING w I ERVIM>1RH ML ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ;) dMENOMELf, DDA 88 -06, REQUESTING TO A1END TIM � DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NAP FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRE20NIDG TO LOU DENSIrY WISrMNTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 96 ACRES Or LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER CF ETIW&NDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET a•: 4 ORDINANCE B0. 365 (first reading) 179 AN ORDINANCE Or TIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIHO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT N0. 88 -01 - TBRRANCE HIGHER, FOR ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT OP A 96 ACRE PORTION OF SAN ESPNARDINO COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREA LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST COWER OF ZZLWANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET 3. ORDERING MORE IN ODNNECTION WITHt ANNEXATION NO. 8 FOR PARCEL MAP 1504 TO LANDSCAPE 181 MIAINTRNANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 - Located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. ANNEXATION NO. 17 FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW 87 -41 AND 187 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87.42 7NWST8 COMC'ERCIAL TO STREET LIGHTING 11AIN1'ENANCE DISTRICT NO 6 - Located west of Uelea AvenueI uuth of Arrow HLEhwey1 located on the southeast corner of 8th Street and Cleveland Avenue respectfully. ANNBIATION N0. 21 FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW 87 -41 AND 195 CONDITIONAL 056 PERMIT 87-42 INWBTRIAL COMDERCLU. TO LAN]73CAP6 LI66TING NAIN':3NANC8 DISTRICT 3 - Located west A RESOLUTION OF YEE CITY COUNCIL 01 TO CITY OF I k HANCSO CUCANDMGA, CALr oRNIA, 09DERISG THE WORK IN ' CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION No. 17 TO STREET { LIGHTING , y, MAINTENANCE DISTRICT REPORT FOR %0- 87-41 87-41 ANDTCUP 87 -02 I �? RESOLUTION N0. 88-476 196 A RESOLUTION Of THE Cr" COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEIATION N0. 21 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTEMOCS DISTRICT go. 3 ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DH 07-41 42 FINAL CUP 87-42 4. OHUEgING THE DEANNESATION OP SHACT WAS. 12402 12365 12672 AND 12673 W8[ PHOCeAN AHPAg SSBHA VISTA PLADNUD COMNUNISY FHON LANDSCAP7 NAINTBNAN(8 DISTRICT NO 4 HESOLVZION N0. 88-477 209 A RESOLUTION 01 TAR CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAHOHGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE _ DEAMTXATION OF WORE PROGRAM AREAS OF TRACT NOS. 12402, 12365, 12672, AND 12673 FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 V. P08L The follevint item bola no legal publication or pea tint "4uiroenta. The Chair will open the meting to receive public testinoDY. No items submitted. _ . _ , 9A, " ? PAGE �r+ City Council Agenda ' AV, July 20, 1988 12 + a: D of Utica Avenue, south of Arrow Highway) located o¢ the Cle +eland Avenue r6 southeast cornor of 8th Street and respactfully. E1 }} RESOLUTION N0. 88-474 182 " ! A RE80LUTIOD OP TBe CRY COUNCIL OF Tim CITY OF ORDERING THE WoHR IN . RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONNtCTION WITH ANNEXATION Y0. 8 TO LANDSCAPE 4 AMD THE FINAL STRICT go. it EYCILMIVS REPORT FOR PARCEL NAP 90504 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -475 188 A RESOLUTION OF YEE CITY COUNCIL 01 TO CITY OF I k HANCSO CUCANDMGA, CALr oRNIA, 09DERISG THE WORK IN ' CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION No. 17 TO STREET { LIGHTING , y, MAINTENANCE DISTRICT REPORT FOR %0- 87-41 87-41 ANDTCUP 87 -02 I �? RESOLUTION N0. 88-476 196 A RESOLUTION Of THE Cr" COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEIATION N0. 21 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTEMOCS DISTRICT go. 3 ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DH 07-41 42 FINAL CUP 87-42 4. OHUEgING THE DEANNESATION OP SHACT WAS. 12402 12365 12672 AND 12673 W8[ PHOCeAN AHPAg SSBHA VISTA PLADNUD COMNUNISY FHON LANDSCAP7 NAINTBNAN(8 DISTRICT NO 4 HESOLVZION N0. 88-477 209 A RESOLUTION 01 TAR CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAHOHGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE _ DEAMTXATION OF WORE PROGRAM AREAS OF TRACT NOS. 12402, 12365, 12672, AND 12673 FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 V. P08L The follevint item bola no legal publication or pea tint "4uiroenta. The Chair will open the meting to receive public testinoDY. No items submitted. s�v�ey PAGE A City Council Agoado //z/a/zOW, ` July 20, 1908 13 O. CRY HAMMIS 82'AP: Room The following Ltwas do mot legally require any public testimomys although the Chair may open the mmeti.g for public input. 1. UPDATE ON THE'TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE - Staff will be presenting a report on the statue of future amendment$ to the Tree Preservation Ordinance. R. ODUNM IVIIIWS The following items have boom requested by the City Council for discussion. They are mot public hearing itemsr although the Chair my open the meting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF SELECTION OP INDIVIDUAL TO PILL TO UNBTPIRID TERM ON TEE PUBLIC SAYBTY COMMISSION - A vacancy er6sted by the resignation of David Barker. tarn 7 -17-87 to 1- 17.92. I. IDENTIPICATTOf OF rMs FOR FAIT W"MC This is the tine for City Council to identify the items they wish to discus$ at the next meeting. These item will not bn discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. J. OMMRCATIONS RROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general 2ublic to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council my receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meting. Camsents are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L ADJOURA M Meeting to adjourn to a dlosed Session with City Attorney to discuss pending litigations. s�v�ey city Council Agenda I . July 20, 1988 14ry r ra It Beverly A. Authelet, City Clark of the City of Rancho Co ryon22' hereby certify that • ti,,, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda w. po. red or. July 15, 1988, seventy -tvo Line hour. prior to the meting par A.D. 2674 at 9320 -C Base Lino Road. June 1, 1988 CITY OF RWCHO COCAMMA CITY COORMI, KDWTES Regular Mvetinf A. CALL TC CUM A regular sleeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga not on Wednesday. Jose 1, 1988, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line o Road. Rs - ^.ho Cuesaonas. California. The meeting van called to orde- at 7t32 P.M. by K40T DJnni■ L. Stout. ` Present were CotmeClmemberst Deborah N. grave. Charles J. Buquet II. Jeffrey a Ring, Panels J. Wrigbt, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. A_ Also present mores CLty Mansger, Lour" M. Wasseatan: City Clerk. Beverly, A. i Authelet: Legal Councel, James Markmant Associate Planner, Alan Watran{ Senior Administrative Assistant, Mark R. Lorimer: Resource Center Coordinator. Jerry Palwoedi Senior Plot"r. Larry Henderson: Deputy City Planner. Otto Lroutil: S and Associate Planner. Debra Meier. I e } } k } a W • E. A1g0WIR?SKRD /PgLT�[f11TI0Rg Bl. Jim Markman annouueed that all the items under El and E2 rare not subject to public hearings since the hearings bad boon closed and were not continued. } e • a a a C. CWSBRT CAlawmi M. Approval of Minntent April 20, 1988 C2. Approval of Warrants. Register No's. 5/8188 and 5/25/88, and Payroll ending 5/12/88 for the total amount of $1.969.471.12. C3. Ap,,rocal to receive and file current Investment Schedule ae of May 25. 1988. C4, Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer 6 Wine Public Pretioea, The Cub, Jolene R. Kitty. 8411 Foothill Boulevard. CS, Alcoholic Beverage Application for On gale Bear i Wine Bating Place. Joe's New York Deli. Joan Jose Watkovica. 8645 Rsven Avenue #550. City Council Minutes- June 1. 198E Page 2 C6. Approval of Map, execution of reprmenent Agrcmant and Ieprwmcet Security for Tract 13697. located on the southwest corner of Raven Avenue and Carrari Street, aulmitted by H& M, A California Limited Ptrtnerahip. (1002 -09 PAP FINAL) (0602 -01 AGMISE IHPR) RESOLUTION NO. 88-336 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITE OF RANCHO CUCRbOMA. CALIFORNIA. APPROM3 IMPROVEMBUT AGREEMENT. IEPROY MEET SECURITY. AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT CO. 13697 C7. Approval of Map, emecution of Improvement Agreement and 7aprovment Security for Tract 13715, located on the northeast corner of Jeonat Street and Exeter Court, submitted by Halton Hillside Estates Company. (1002 -09 MAP FINAL) (0602 -01 ACRES IMPR) RESOLUTION N0, 80-337 A RESOLUTION OP INS CITE COUNCIL Or INS CITT OF RANCHO CUORMDNOA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IH2ROVDm f AaRSERERT. IMPROVEM M SECURITY. AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT 110. 13715 CU. Approval of Rep. emecution of Inprevment Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13742, located on the south side of Arrow Route, between Sierra Hadre and Calaveres Avenues, submitted by A. C. 6 C. Devolopeent Compaq Limited. (1002 -09 MAP HEAL) (0602 -01 ACRES IMOR) RESOLUTION PO. 88-338 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COOKIE, OF IN .E CQT! Ov RANCHO CUOREONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INFROVEM8NT ACRE814SNT. IMPROVERS" SEWRITE. AND FINAL PAP OF TRACT NO. 13742 C9. Approval of Rep, execution of Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for Tract• 12650 and 12650 -4, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Nilson Avenue, submitted by The Deer Creek Company. (1002 -09 PAP FINAL) (0602 -01 ACRES IMPR) RESOLUTION N0. 88-339 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUrAMDMA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IM4R09EM M AGRESM'dHIS. IHPROVEPONf SECURITIES. AND FINAL PAPS OF TRACT NOS. 12650 AND 12650 -4 CIO. Approval to execute roprovment Agreement Emtenaion for Tract 12590 -3 and Tract 12590 -4, located on the ncrtheut corner of Enq Line Road and Haven Avenue, submitted by Lois Homes. (0602 -01 AGREE EITER) f City Council Jun 1988 Page 3 REOOUTION N0. 83-340 A RESSOLUTION OF THE CITY OOUN= 01770E CITY OF RANCHO OIGIONOA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEISNT AGREEIffiNT SITPNSION AH3 IMOVENdNT SECURITY FOR TRACT NOS. 12590 -3 AND 12590 -4 MI. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12590. located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. submitted by Lwis Roses. (0602 -01 AGREE IHPR) RESOLUTION W. 88-341 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT1 COUNCIL 01 1H8 CITY OF RANCHO CUGIDNOA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING INIROVEHENY AG4PVJlen EXTENSION Alto IMPROVEMENT SECURITY MR TRACT 12590 C12. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12590 -2. located on the oortbeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. submitted bq Lewis Homes. (0602 -01 AGREE EITI" RESOLUTION NO. 88 -342 A RESOLUTION 01 THE CITY CGGNCIL Or 770E CITY OF RANCHO CUCkWNG1. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMOVEMENT AGREBNENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY YOU TRACT 12590-2 C13. Approval to execute Isprwement Agreement Extension for Tract 131922 located on the north side of Terra vista Partway, east of Spruce Avontet. submitted by Leeie Homes. (0602 -01 AGREE EXI'@H) RESOLUTION N0. 88-343 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMMA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IHFRCVKHSNT AGRBUCW MMIMSION AND IHFR07EHENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13192 C14. Approval to confits a City Council decision made ou May 18. 1988- for an appeal of a planning Commission decision relating to a Time Extensiun for Tentative Tract No. 12332 - Cristiano. located on the north side of Hillside Channel east of Haven Avenue. (0701 -06 APPEAL) RESOLUTION N0. 88 -344 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCUn CUCAMINUA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP HOMER 12332. TO PERMIT A CUSTOM LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 151 TATS ON 85 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VEPT LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND LOCATED ON THE NORTH BIDE 01 HILLSIDE CHANNEL EAST OF HAVEN AVINOB. RANCHO CUCAIUIT.A. CALIFORNIA. AND HATam _ FINDINGS AND SUPFORT THEREOF City Council Minutes Jose 1. 1988 _ Page 4 C15. Approval to "sent* Program Supplement No. 13 (CO 84 -067) for Local Agency -State Agreement No. 08 -5420 batman the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California for the Roadway Improvement of Grove Avenue within the Atchison. Topeka and Santa Pe Railroad Crossing No. 2-99.7 located 1001 north of 8th Street. The City's portion of $140.116.00 is to be funded by Systems Development Ands. Account No. 22 -4637 -8751. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) RESOLUTION N0. 88-345 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITr OF RANCHO COCAMMGA. CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING THE MMOUTION AND SIGHING OR FROCRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 13 FOR LOCAL -STATE ACREVZNT 110. 08-3420 FOR ROAIDAT WIDENING IMMtOVEBNTS ON GROVE AVENUE WITHIN THE ATCHISON. TOPBRA AND BANTA PC RAILROAD CROSSING (10. 2 -99.7) RIGHT-0P- -NAT CIS. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication (CO 88-068) between Albert P. Bangle and Vivian E. Single and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street rrontege Improvements along 6714 Amethyst Street and 19th Street. located at the southwest corner of 19th Street and Amethyst Street. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) RESOLUTION NO. 88-346 A RESOLUTION OF US CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNCA. CALIFRNIA. ACCEPT= AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM ALBERT P. E:.OLE AND VIVIAN R. BANGLE. AND AUTHORIZING THE MATOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SA_%ffi Cl?. Approval to execute contract (03 08-069) for the Slurry Seal Program. Phase I. fiscal year 1987 -88. District 1-9 as shown on attached maps. warded to IPS Services for the amount of $95.000 to be funded Erm S.B. 300 fonds. Account No. 15- 4637 -8050. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) CIS. Approval to award and execute a Professional Service Agreement (00 88 -070) for Planning and Design Services relating to the updating of the City's )Wmr- Plan of Drainage for the Cucamonga. Deer and Day Creels area to Pauses and Associates for the mount of $258.300 to be funded from Drainage Ands. Account Mo. 23 -4637 -8766 with partial reimbursement ($73.000) from RDA And No. 11- 50300. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) C19. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (00 85-071) with CPS Consulting Engineers to pre;are Base Line Road Widening Phase I from Route 15 to 500 feet west of Etivanda Avenue and Storm Drain Construction for a fee not to exceed $50.600.00 to be funded fras the Systems Development And. Account No. 22 -4637 -8730. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) RESOLUTION W. 88-347 City Council Minutes June 1, 1988 Page 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE an COUNCIL or THE CITY OP RANCHO C1CAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. 70 AWARD AND EIECITE A PROFESSIONAT SERVICES AGREEEROHT WI7H CPA OONaULTING ENGINEERS OF T7STIN. CALIFORNIA, TO PREPARE PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE FOR BASE LIKE ROAD IMPROVEMENT AND STORM DRAIN PROJECT FROM ROUTE 15 TO 500 FEET WEST Of ETIWANEL AVENUE C20. Approval to award the contract for design services relating to the, updating of the Cityto Standard Plans and Development Specifications to J. F. Davidson 6 Associates. Incorporated, for the mount of $27,075.00 to be funded from Development Mamgesent Cantraet Services, Account Umber 01 -4638 -6028. (0601 -01 BID) C21. Approval to award the Victoria Street Rehabilitation and Drainage Ltprovesent Project between Btiwanda Avenue and Beat Avenue to Bob Britton. Incorporated for the mount of $144,979.85 to be funded tram Gas Tm 2107 Fund. (0601 -01 BID) C22. Approval to award the Construction of Maintenance Facilivy at pad Hill Coaaunity Park project to Bopatk Enterprises for the mount of $139.000.00 to be funded :row Capital Inprovmaent Facilities - Account No. 01 -4347 -7043. (0601 -01 BID) C23. Approval to award the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Highland Avenue and Etiwands Avenue Taprovenant Project to Hovey Electric, Incorporated, for the mount of $93.255.00, to be funded from T11A Article 8 Am9a Account No. 12 -4637 -8707. (0601 -01 BID) C24. Approval to award the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue loprewment project to Hovey Electric, Incorporated, for the mount of $81,332.00, to be funded from TDA Article 8 Funds Account No. 12 -4637 -8708. (0&01 -01 BID) C25. Approval to award the 5 year lease /purebace of a 2,000 gallon water tr0ek- to Dieterich International of Poaom, California, for the mount of $54,834.00, to be funded fray Capital Expenditures - Account No. 01 -4647 -7045. (0606 -01 EQUIP L /P) C26. Approval to enter into so agreement on the financing of City equipsent which has been procured in accordance with purchaulag procedure with Sat Interstate Credit Alliance, Inc. over a five year period. (0606 -01 EQUIP L/P) RESOLUTION NO. 88-348 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF RANCHO OICAPDICA. CALIFORNIA. ADTRORXZINO THE LUSE POROME OF an INC. EQUIprdn THROUGH 1ST IN!ERSTATE CREDIT ALLIANCE. city Council Minutes June 1, 1988 Page 6 C27. Approval to award the Blurry Seal Program, Phase II. 1987/88 to Pavement Coatings Co, for the mount of $66.304.66 to be funded from SB 300 Foods - Acmunt No. 15 -4637 -8050. (0601 -01 BID) C28. Approval to award the Lion Street Improvement Project between the Atchison. Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad and Ninth street to JEC Construction for the "cunt of $51,747.10, to be funded from Capital Reserve Fund - Account No. 72 -4205 -6028. (0601 -01 BID) C29. Approval to award the Hillside Road Storm Drain and Street Improvement Project, from Malachite Avenue to Archibald Avenue to Laird Construction for the mount of $432,360.80, to be funded from System Development road Account No. 22- 4637 -874d and new City -ride drainage fund Account. (0601 -01 BID) C30. Approval to award the Etfvanda Storm Drain System Line 2 -1. Phase I Improvement Project, located vest of I -15, north of Victoria Street from the Victoria Basin to north of Highland Avenue and future Route 30 Freeway, to Albert N. Davies. Incorporated, for the amount of $597,330.00, to be funded frm Drainage Fund - Account No. 19- 4637 -8194. (0601 -01 BID) C31. Approval to award the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase II Improvement Project, from Foothill Boulevard to 6th Street, to B-1 Enterprises Corporatlon for the mount of $37.650.50, to be funded from SBA 325 /TDA Article 3 Funds, Account No. 12 -4637 -8605. (0601 -01 BID) C32. Approval to award a contract for consultant services to BSI Consultants, Incorporated in the mount of $73.120.00 for production of a city -vide Traffic Control Desire Inventory. This inventory will determine the number, condition, and location of all traffic control devices in the City. The devices include, but are not limited to, signa, stripes, legends and curb markings. A computer system (hardware and software) will also be provided to keep a dynamic $yet= whereby devices can be monitored, serviced, replaced or removed according to time passed and current condition. The knowledge and control gained will help to reduce future risk end liability caused by substandard, damaged or missing traffic control devices. (0601 -01 BID) C33. Approval to reject all bids as submitted for the Sapphire Landscaping Trail Renovation, located south of Banyan Street, an nomrroponsive to the needs of the City and authorize readvertising of the project. (0601 -01 BID) RESOLUTION N0. 88 -349 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMINUA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "SAPPHIRE TRAIL LANDSCAPING AND RECONSTRUCTION", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECfINO 783 CITY CLEBR TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C34. Approval to reject bids for the City Corporate Yard, Peace I, located at 9153 Ninth Street. Rancho Cucamonga, as being non- responsive to the needs of the City. (0601 -01 BID) City Council Minutes June 1. 1988 Page 7 C5. Approval to accept the Victoria Park Lane Relandscaping and Reconstruction as cosplete, release bonds and authorise the City Engineer to file a notice of cospletion and approve the final contract mount of $764.218.39. (0704 -18 NOT COMP.T) (0602 -01 BOND RRL) RPSCLIIPION NO. 88-350 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 788 CITY Of RANCHO CECAMNCA. CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR VICTORIA PARE. LANE LANDSCAPING AND REOONSgT WCfION AND C AUTHORIZING ME FILING OF A NOTICE Of COMPLETION FOR THE S- WORE C36. Approval to accept inprovemnta, release bonds and file a notice of coapletion fort (0704 -18 NOT COMMT) (0602 -01 BCUD AFL) a Tract 12673, located on the east side of Milliken Avenue north of Church Street. Releases Faithful Perforsanee Bond (Street) $278,000 Accepts Maintenance Guarantee Band (Street) $ 27.800 RESOLUTION NO. 88-351 A RPSCLUTYON OF THE CITY ODUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAFOMT.A. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING IRIS PUBLIC IMPROVEHENTS FOR TRACT 12783 AND AUTHORIZIN: THE FILING OF A NOTICZ OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Tract 12532, located on the mouth aide of Victoria Avenue between Archibald Avenue and Rectum Avenue. (0704-18 NOT CONPLT) (0602 -01 BOND APL) Releases Faithful Perfonance Bond (Street) $606.000 Ac"ptt Maintanance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 60.600 RESOLUTION NO. 88-352 A RESCLUTION OF THE MIT COUNCIL OF THE MIT OF RANCHO CECANDRGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING. IBIS PUBLIC IMPtOVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12532 AND AUTMORIZIM THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CUP 85-26, located on the north side of Babe Line Road, went of Victoria Park Lane. (0704-18 NOT COMMT) (0602 -01 BOND REL) Faithful Perforeance Bond (Street) $ 72.000 City Council Minutes June 1. 1988 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 88-353 A RESOLIIIION Or NEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITI OP RANCHO C AmIrA. CALIFORmIA. ACczprw THE PUBLIC IMPR09mmm FOR alp 85 -26 AND AUTHORIZING ME FILING Or A NOTICR OF COMPLETIOT FOR 7798 WORK DR 86 -22. located on the east aide of 6th Street. north of Buffalo Avenue. (C607. -01 BOND REL) (0704 -18 NOT COMFLT) Certification of Deposit (Street) $ 8.000 RESOLUTION NO. 88-228 A REOLUTION OF TAE CITY COUNCIL OP 79E CITI OF RANCHO C UMMA. CALIFORNIA. ACESPr17G THE PUBLIC IMP109O02RTS FOR DR 86-22 AND AUTHORIZ71C ME FILING OF A NOTICE OF CUMFUSTION FOR THE WORK DR 86-39. located on the northwest turner of Helms Avenue and 9th Street. 0704-18 NOT COMPLT) (0602 -01 BOND REI.) Certification of Deposit $ 7.400 REOLUTION N0. 88-354 f. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUhLTL OF THE MIT OF RANCHO CUCAMMA. CALIFORNIA. ACC:PIINC THE PUBLIC IWRO7PJBNIS FOR DR 86-39 AND AOIHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C37. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 87 -181) for a Professional Services Agreement with Jeffreys and Associates Field Services for the 19th Street project from Raven Avon= to Cartilla Avenue. It is recommended that the Errors and Omissions Insurance included in the Agreement be waived. (0602 -01 CONT AMR) C38. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (00 87 -194) for a Professional Services Agreement with Jeffreys and Associates Field Services to perform Right -of -Way Appraisal- Acquisition Services for the 19th Street Project from Wen City Limits to Jasper Street. It is recommended that the Evrora and Omissions Iusurenm be waived and the Worker's Compensation Inauranca crossed out in the Agre,UM. Section 8 W. as not applicable. be reinstated. (0602 -01 CONT AMEN) C39. Approval to execs.; Contract Change Order No. 4 (00 87 -20) for a Professional Services Agreement with Don Creek and Associate, to continue design administration for four (4) phases of 19th Street Projects to be funded iron System& Development Fund Acmmt No. 22- 4637 -8743. It is recommended to expand their contract by $8.000.00 to bring their contract total to $62.000.00. (0602 -01 ODNT AMR) Nl City Council Minutes June 1. 1988 Page 9 C40. Approval to uses the park facilities in the Victoria "Vineyards North• Devsl0pientt Kenyon Park (Northerly facility) and Vintage Park (South of Victoria Park Lane, . (1404-06 PARK DEVE.) C41. Set public hearing for July 6. 1988 - Approval to Annez Tract Not. 126508 12650 -4. 13715. 13697 and 13742 (various locations tbmogLout the City) to Street Lighting Maiatenance District Nos. 1 and 2 ae Annexation No. 46 and Annexation No. 30. (0401 -03 ST LIGHT NO) R" hfION 88 -355 A RECLUTION OF 7HE R- ? COUNCIL OF 7HE CITY OP RANCHO CUCINDNGA. CALIIORNLA. JV MMININ\RY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 46 7O STREET LIGHTING PALNEwCR DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88-356 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA. CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING NAINGEPANCR DISTRICT NO. 1. AN ASSESSNENT DISTRICTt DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS &MMUTION NO. 46 TO STREET LICRTRA FNINTEAWCR DISTRICT N0. is PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACE OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIC AND PLACE FOR HEARING UBJECTIDNS 7HERE7O RESOLUTION M. 88-357 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA. CALIFORNIA. OF PRELINRNARY APPROVAL OP CITY EIVINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 30 TO STREET LIGHTING Nhnm ANC3 DIS7RICT NO. 2 RESMMOR NO. 88 -358 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO - CUCANDNGA. CALIFORNIA. DECLARING IFS INTENTION 10 ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINIRNANCE DISTRICT NO. 2. AN ASSESSHENT DISTRICIt DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 30 70 STREET LIGHTING MAINTMANCE DISTRICT NO. 21 PURSUANT TO TAz LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OPFEAIG A TIE AHD PLACE MR REARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C42. Set public beating for July 6. 1988 - Approval to Anne' Tract Nos. 12650. 12650 -4. 1371. 13697 and 13742 (various locations throughout the City) to Landacapt Maintenance District No. 1 so Annexation No. 48. (0401 -03 I"ISCAPS MD) City Couocfl Minutes June 1. 1988 a Page 10 '' RFSC.UTION N0. 80-359 ' A RESOLoCLON OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF r-ANCHO CUOANONGA. CALIFORNIA. OF PRYLIHINART APPROVAL OF CITY zNGnzSRRtS REPORT TOR ANtDQATION N0. 48 TO LANDSCAPE ININTENANCS DISTRICT NO. 1 RFSo.UTTON N0. 88-360 P A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCM7NGA. CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS INf6RTIOH TO ORDER THE ANNSSATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1. AN ASSESSNENT DISTRICTt DESIGNATING SAID pNW.•TATIOA A9 AN=ATION N0. 48 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTLOUNCt DISTRICT NO. IN PURSUANT TO 'IDS LANDSC&PING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS TRER8T0 C43. Set public hearing for J ®e I5. 1988 - Consideration of varetiou of drivevaya on Jasper Street and an emergency vehicle vehicular acceoa rights for acres& on Lomita Drive. (1110 -18 VAC ASE ESIU WOUTION N0. 88-361 A RFSO,DTION OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WGMONGA. CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF SAN BRBNARDLNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS IIITENTION TO VACATE VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR TWO DRIVEWAYS ON JAS MR STREET AND AN SNERrZNCT VEHICLE ACCESS ON LOMITA DRIVE NOTION: Moved by Ring. seconded by Wright to approve the Consent Calendar as submitted. Wtion carried unarimously 5 -0. t R R R R R D. CONSENT ORDINANCES Dl. ENVIRONNSML ASSESSMENT AND DEVELAPE11T DISTRICT AMENDMENT 88 -05 - AMNANSON - A request to emend the Develoiment District Map from `PC• (Flood 'LM' Residential. 4 -8 deelling units per acre) for a Control ) to (Lav-Medium 1.06 acre Parcel. located north of Highland Avenue. vest of Milliken Avenue •• APP: Portion of 201- 271 -55. (0203 -05 DD AMINDMENT) ORDINANCE NO. 349 (second reading) AN ORDINACE OF THE CST COUNCIL OF ME CITY OF RANCHO - CUCAMON,A, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING.. DEVQ.OPMM DISTRICT AFENDHENT 88-05. RMUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM 'PC* (FLOOD OONTRCO SO 'LM" _ (LAW- NEDIUM RESIDENTIAL) FOR A 1.06 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED NOR7H OF HIGHLAND AVEh4E. WEST OF MILLIRSN AVEN.OE - APHS A PORTION OF 201- 271-55 City council Minutes June 1. 1988 Page 11 ,s, a a a a a a C D2. COMSID8MTIOH OF - BSTABLISHMM OF SPEED LIMITS - Remuandation to 5 establish speed limits on Victoria Street frog Ewan Avenue to Mendocino Place. i Baker Avenue fret Orb Street to Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive from FuotLill Boulevard to Alta Cuests Drive. (1141 -SO SPEED LIMITS) ORDINANCE NO. 350 (second reading) i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCANUNi4, CALITORMIA. AMENDIW SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE t RANCHO CUCAWWA MT7 CODE RSLARDING PRINK FACIE SIZED p LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS City Clark Authelat read the titles of Orddaan, Abe. 349 avd 350. IDTIONt Moved by Buquet, "waded by Wright to wive full readiaga of the ordinances and to approve said ordinances. Motion tarried unanimously 5 -0. >- a a a a a a Ev AWIRTIM PUBLIC UrARIM El. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND- GEORAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -040 — - WOURSE DEVE40PMLNT - A request to asend the General Plan Land Use Map lras Lcv-Nadiu Residential (4-8 duelling untts per acre) to High Residential (24-30 duelling units per acre) for 5.05 acres of land, located on the south side of Base Line Road, vent of Archibald Avenue - AIR 208 - 031 -18. 19. (Coutiumd from Nay 18. 1988 seeting) (0203 -03 GP AFZNDEW.) (NOTES Item was not subject to a public bearing since said bearing bad been closed at the May 18 meeting.) RESOLUTION NO. 88-362 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITE OF RANCHO OUCANDNGA. CALIIDRRIA, APPROVING. A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE NAP OF THE GENERAL ALAN, CPA 87 -04G, FROM W,L- HEDIUY RESIDER= (4-8 DWELLING UNITS MR ACRE) TO HIGH RESIDENTIAL (24-30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR A SENIOR HOUSING P9CJ8Cr ON 5.05 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASH LINE ROAD, WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. AND EASE FINDINGS IN SUPIURT THERETO MTIONI Moved by Fang. seconded by Brown to approve Raeolutica No. 88 -362. Notion carried 4-1 -0. (Wright no). City Council Minutes June 1, 1988 Page 12 •--nra..u.zaa o.- 2 NOOR9E DBVE rMffNr - A ;;;Drat to vend the Development Dir[rict NHep fra LIFAIdi.a 4•e dwelling wits per acre) to High Residential (24-30 dselling units per acre; attached with the Senior Houcing Overlay District (SHOD) to the base district for 5.05 acrec of land, located on the south aide of Base Line Road, vest of Archibald Avenue - APN 208 - 031 -18. 19. (0203 -05 DD ATENDHENT) a ORDINANCES NO. 351 (first trading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITE OF RANCHO COCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST TO AMEND ME - DEVFLOPNENf DISTRICT M%P. DDA 87 -05. FROM LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWEO,LING UNITS PER ACRE) 2U HIGH L RESIDENTIAL (24-30 DWELLING UNITS TER ACRE) ATTACHED VIM US SENIOR HOUSING OVEELAY DISTRICT (SHOD) FOR A 5.05 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE SC11H SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD. WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE. RANCHO CrAmHCA. CALIPORULA. AND MANE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 351. HOTIONt Moved by ling, seconded by Wright to waive the fall reading of Ordinance No. 351. Notion "tried unanisourJV S -0. MOTIONS Moved by ling, seconded by BugDet cc set a second reading for June 15, 1988. Notion carried 41 -0. (Wright no). DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 87 -02 - NGORSR DEVSOOPHERr - A Development Agrement between the City of Rancho Caremongo and Hourse Developcvnt for the purpose of Providing a Senior Housing Project per the requirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District (Section 27.20.040 of the Development Code. Ordinance 211) for 170 apartment "its to be located on the south side of Bass Line Road, vest of Archibald Avenue - APN 208 -031 -18, 19. (0602 -01 AGREE DUEL) ORDINANCE NO. 356 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 79B CITY OF RANCHO L` C rANONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING 'THE DDCOMHNT EWMED vDEVELOPENT AGRBESew N0. 87 -02 SENIOR CITIZENS, HOUSING* CONCERNING DRAT PROFERTI LOCATED SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, WEST OF ARCHIBAL.D AVENUE. TN IRE QTY OF PANCHO CUCANDNGA, CALIFORNIA, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EECOTE 1NE SAFE ON BEHALF OF 73E CITY OP RANMO COCAHDHGA City Clerk Autbelet read the title of Ordinance No. 356. HDTIONt Moved by Ring, seconded by Stout to Naive fall reading of Ordinance No. 356. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. HOTIONt Moved by Ring, secendsd by Stout to met second reading for Ordinance No. 356 for June 15. 1988. Notion "tried unanimously 5 -0. R City Council Minutes June 1. 1988 Page 13 -r..no - .amnunnn, o.-�on — want sea+ 3NPESTNeNIS - A request to amend the Lend Uae Elsent of the General Plan from Lov-Medinm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per arse) to Office for 1.69 acres of land. located on the vert side of Archibald Avenue. south of Base Line - APH 208-031 -17. 54. 55. 56 and 57. (0203 -03 GP AMMMENT) RESOLUTION NO. 88-364 A RESOLUTION OF Mill CITY COUNCIL OF THE MIT OF P.ANCRO OUCANDNUA. CILIIURMA. APPROVING A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE NAP OF THE GENERAL PLAN. GPA 87 -04H. PROM LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DUELLING DNI79 PER ACRE) TO OFFICE 7CR A 1.69 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCiBALD AVENUE. SOUTH OP BASIC LINE ROAD. RANCHO COCANCRGA. CALIFORNIA. AHD WE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF NDTIONt Moved by Ring. seconded by Brown to approve Resolution No. 88 -364. Motion carried ananimovely 5 -0. Low- Meditte R�si-Jectial (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Office Professiorml for 1.69 acres of land. located on the vast side of Archibald Avenue. soutb of Bass Line Road - APH 208-031 -17. 54. 55. 56 and 57. (0203 -05 DD Aigt7DNENT) ORDINANCE NO. 352 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE MIT OF MICRO OUCANDNGA. GLIPORNIA. APPRO71M A REQUEST To AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT YAP. DVA 87 -06. FROM LOW - MEDIUM RESIDERTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO OFFICE/FROFESSIONAL FOR A 1.69 ACRE PARS. LOCATED ON THE WEST BIDE OF ARCH BALD AVENUE. SOUTH OF BABE LUTE ROAD. RANCHO OUCAIDNCA. CALIFORNIA. AND MARE FINDIN,.S IN SUPPORT THEREOF City Clark Autbelet read the title of Ordinance No. 352. NDTIONt Moved by Ring. st.anded by Wright to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 352 and set second reading for Jane 15. 1988. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. - Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying the development of 170 senior apartments on 4.05 strew of land in the Lov-Nodiue Riaidential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the mouth side of Base Line Road. vest of Artbibcld Avenue - APN 208-031 -18. 19. Ascociated with the project is Tree Removal Permit 88-14. (0701 -06 APPEAL) _ City Council Minutes June 1, 1988 i Page 14 RESOLUTION E0. 88 -365 r " "•`, . A RLTCLUTYON OP THE CITI COUNCIL OP THE CITY Of RANCHO k COCAMNGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING ME EOPfENT REVIEW �+- 87 -33. ISE DEVELOPMENT OF 170 SENIOR APARTMENTS ON 4.85 ACRES OF LARD IN THE LOW - MDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 �+ DUELLING UNITS PER AC(E). LOCATED ON 789 SOUTH SIDE OP h BASE LINE ROAD. EAST OF ARCIIBALD AVENUE - APH 208-031 -18 AND 19 HDTIONt Moved by RUB. seconded by Stout to adopt Resolution No. 88 -365. Motion carried 4-1 -0. (Wright no). y ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -34 - -WEST -END II INVPSTMENI9 - Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying the development of a 22.500 square foot medical office building on 1.7 acres of land in the Lov -Medius Rasidential District (4-8 dwelling unite per acre). located on the vest side of Archibald Avenue. "nth of Base Line Road - APJ 208 - 031 -17. 54. 55. 56 and 57. Associated with the project is Tree Removal Pamir 8C -14. (0701 -06 APPEAL) RESOLUTION NO 88-366 A RESCLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CICAFON7A. CALI%ORNIA. APPP.OVIM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -34. INS DEVELOPMENT OF A 22,400 f4UARE FOOT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING ON 1.7 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL D13TRICT (GENERAL PLAN ANEEIDMENT PENDING). LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE. SJUm OF BASS LINE ROAD - APB :,XL031 -17. 54. 55. 56 AND 57 NOTION: Moved by King. seconded by Buguet to approve Resolution No. 88 -366. Notion untied Unanimously 5 -0. e A a a e f E2. .nnaca - a request to (Goad rue Ueneral Plan Land Use Nap from 'Office° to 'Hiigbbotbood Commerciale for approtimately 3.45 acres of land, located on the couthveat corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue - APH 208- 202 -13. 14. (Continued from Nay 4. 1988) (0203 -03 UP AWND:ENT) (NOTE: Itmm not subject to a public bearing since said hearing bad been held on May 18 and was closed.) RPSO UTI0N NO. 88-367 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL Oi THE CITY OF RANCHO C1C%IONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIIG OSNEPAL PLAW AMENDMENT WA) 88 -01A, REQUESTING TO AWJM INS GENERAL KX1 LAND USE PAP FROM OPPICS /pROMSSIONAL (OP) TO NEIGHBORHOOD OOHOERCIAL (NC) WE 3.45 ACRES Of LAND LOCATED ON ME City Council minutes ' June 1. 1988 Page 15 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EASE LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENGE. RANCHO COOIMDNGA. CALIFORNIA. APH 208- 202 -13 AND 14 AND MATS FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MDTIONI Moved by Huquet, seconded by Ring to approve Resolution No. 88 -367. Motion carried unanimouely 5 -0. �nr artVnllCnalW NCNOnon[ nIW 'LC,LNr„Gttl' Yen a=., n.IDNlrmna oa —aa — aR=4 E. CARTER - A request to "end the Development Districts Map from Offica Professional (OP) to Neighborhood Coaaercial (NC) for approximately 3.45 acres of land, located on the southwest corner of Ease Line Road and Hellman Avenue - AYE 208 - 202 -13. 14. (Continued from May 18. 1988) (0203 -05 DO AMENDMENT) ORDINANCE NO. 353 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE 07 THE CIT7 COUNCIL OF THE CITY .P RANCHO COCAMDIGA. CALIFORNIA. AMENDING ME DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM OFTICE /FROPESSIONAL (OP) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) FOR 3.45 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUMWFST CORNER 07 EASE LINE ROAD AND HELLM AN AVENUE - APH 208 - 202 -13. 14 City Clark Autbalet read the title of Ordinance No. 353. MOTION, Moved by Wright. seconded by Zing to waive full reading of Ordinance Ya. 353. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. 13TIONt loved by King. seconded by Eoquet to set second reading for June 15. 1988. Motion r tried 4-1 -0. (Wright no). a • • • • a E3. ZN VIR01QMh7AL ASSESSMENT. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMEN)MffiNT 87 -048 — WeIRAB PROPERTIES - A development agreement and request to "end the land use element of the General Plan frm OffIm to Neighborhood Omaercial for 3.58 scram of Iand located at the southwest corner of Lomita Caurt'rnd- ArcbibaJJ Avenue - APH 202 - 151 -33. Staff Report was presented by Alan Watree. Associate Planner. (0602 -01 AGREE ICVEL) (0203 -03 OF A)- =?v7TT) Mayor Scout opened the meeting for public beating. Iddressing Council vast Hardy Stroxier. Costa Wsa, stated they bad problems with Section 12 of the Development Agreement entitled Froiect phasing. In particular, the sentence stating 'Not withstanding tea foregoing, until a certificate of occupancy is granted for the restaurant, no other certificate of occupancy shall be granted for any other development on the site except the office use." He eurouraged Council to reconsider this sentence. 76ere being no further public response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. City reuacil minutes June 1. 1988 Page 16 Hr. Eroutil. Deputy City Planner. stated that this language was put in at the request of the Planning Commission in order to guarantee the development of the restaurant as a total package. Tha feeling in that the retail portion would be developed vitbouth the restaurant. and without this language it could not be assured that the restuaraut use would be developed. City Attorney Hartman stated this language would help to get the restaurant there "ooce". If the restaurrnt failed. there vas no way it could be forced to have another restaurant put there. Both Councilvamau Wright rnd Councilvoman Brown stated that Council entertain this concept because there was a select group (senior citizens) who requested this= therefore, they botL supported leaving the entrance in. Mayor Stoat also agreed that he could not support the agreement without that clause since Council was responding to the request of the Seniors. Councilzan Duguat expressed that be vas unconfortablo with the escape clause in Section 13. entitled Deletion of Restaurant. RESOLUTION NO. 88-368 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING DEVZ OPMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -04B. AMENDING TAE LAND USE ELEVZNT OF THE RANCHO CECAMONGA GENERAL ALAN MOTIONS Moved by Sing, seconded by Buguat to approve Resolution No. 88-368. Motion carried unauiaously 5 -0. .MtW tar o.-uj - wt4n4.LA rnuranrAt - A aeve40pmest agreement sun request to amend the Development District Map from "OP" (Office/Professional) to "NC" (Neighborhood Commercial) with 3.58 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue - APH 202 - 151 -33 (0602 -01 ACRES DEVPIL) (0203 -05 (DO AIENDHENT) ORDINANCE MO. 354 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE Of THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMGNGA. CALIFORNIA. AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM OPPICg /PROPESSIONAL (OP) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NO FOR 3.58 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST OORMZR OP LOMITA COURT AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE - AAN 202- 151 -33 ORDINANCE NO. 357 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIT^ COUNCIL OF THE CITT Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING THAT DOCUMENT ENTITLED "DZVELOPENT AGREEMENT NO. 87 -03 CONCERMG PROPERTI LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Or ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND e City Council minutes =? June 1, 1968 Page 17 i; LOMITA WORT. RANCHO CUCAMCR 31. CALIFORWAe AND " AUIIMORrZTW, TAB MYOR TO UXFWTB 781 SAME ON IDERALF OF SEA CITY Or RANCHO COWDick City Clerk Autbelet read the title oT Ordiunce No. 354 and Ordinance No. 357. W IONt Moved by Pngoat, seconded by Riog to vaive fall reading of Ordinance Nov. 354 and 357 and *or second reading for Jane 15, 1988. Motion "tried unanimously 5 -0. t t t f f f L9. CONSIDERATION TO REN6W AND'JLAHCB SERVICES PERMIT FOR MERCY ANPUGINCE Staff report by Mark w-. aer. Senior Administrative Assistant. (1206-01 A"SULANCE) !ayor Sto • opened the nesting for public bearing. Addressing the City Council %ant Rorer Aerte of Marcy Ambulance, vbo stated that be was available as a reanur" Peron.. to answer any questions. A question and anuer tine betveea Hr. Aerts and City Council followed. 'Piece being no fuatber public response, Mayor Stout closed the public bearing. MDTIONt Moved by Buqutt, seconded by Mug to support the tenwal of the permit for Marcy Ambulanc*. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. rMWWWWI E5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSHRHf AMID nFOLOPMENf DISTRICT AMENDMENT -88-03 (_PR820NE ) — PULSAR DEVEWPNENTT - Ara ieeee to presow a portion of the San Bernardino County unincorporated area (for annexation purposes) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located ncrt., of Higbland Avenue. couth of Shit Avenue extension, scat of Deer Creek utility corridor, and most of the County /City boundary - APH 225 - 161 -19. 32, 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 3E; 49.- 53. 55, and 61. (0203 -05 DD AMENDMENT) (r- � was x bfned with Itm O1 under City Manager's Staff Reports.) City Clerk read the title of Ordinance No. 355. ORDINANCE NO. 355 (first reading) AM. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WGMONGA, CALIFORNIA. AMENDING (PREZONE) THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP TO THE LAND USE MESIGNiATION OF IOU RESIDENTIAL TO THE PROPERTIES LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SLOTH Or SUMMIT AVENUE EXTENSION. EAST OP THB DAY (MEEK UTILITY OORRIDOR. AND NEST Or THE OOUNIT /CITT BOUNDARY - ARM 225 - 161 -19. 32. 33. 34, 35. 36, 37. 38, 49, $3, 55. AND 61 u City Council minutes F June 1. 1988 Page lb HDTIOHS Moved by Buquet, attended by Iligq to valve full reading of Ordinance No. 355 and set second reading for June 15. 1988. lotion carried unanimously 5 -0. • • a e a a ourarma THE NORR It, ODmacTiON NITS, Staff Report was presented by Lauren Wasserman. City manager. Mayor Stout opened the seating for public bearing. There being no raap)nse. Nsyor Stout closed the public hearing. RESOLUTION NO. 88-369 A RESOLUTION OF IRE QTY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF RANCHO COCAPDICA. CALIFORNIA. ORDERIHO IRE WORE IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 46 TO LANDSCAps MAINrENANCZ DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING IRE FINAL ENOINESR'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13476 AND 12902 RESOLUTION N0. 88-370 A RESOLUTION OF IRE CITr COUNCIL OF THE CITT OP RANCHO COCAHDN7A. CALIFORNIA. ORDERING IRE WORK IN CONNECTION WI7H ANNEXATION NO. 44 TO STREET LIGHTIIO NAINTBNANCR - DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPT= IRE FINAL EMrN='S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13476 AND 12902 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -371 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIT COVKML OF THE CITT OF RANCHO COCAMMA. CALIFORNIA, ORDFjlNUi IRE WORE IN CONHECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 28 TO STREET LICBTINU 1SAINPEdANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING ME FINAL RPDINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13476 AND 12902 FOTIONt Nerved by Buquet, seconded by King to approve Resolution lbs. 88 -369. 80 -370, and 88 -371. Notion canted unanimously 5 -0. 0 e••aa City Council min¢tea June Ii 1988 Page 19 ( Items E7 and E8 vote bandled together) J, E7. APPROVAL- OP ANNUAL ASSESSM RM AND THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS -POR - STREET LICRHTINO DISSRP2 -NOS -1. -2. 3. 4. 5v 6 6 - Annual Assessments and the Engineez'• Repaztm for Stroet Lighting District Ms. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6 6 -'The ' City Engineer'N Annual Report and a Resolution to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting District Nos. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. i 6. (0401 -09 ST LIGHT NA) *` E8. APPROVAL OF ANNUAL A9SESSNSNM -AND THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS-POR LOWCAPE P12N1ENANCB DIOTRICT• SAS. 1. -2. 3. 4, -5-, a 6 - An Mwssme¢t• and the Engineer's Reports for Landscape Halnteocnce District Nos. 1. 2. 3. 4. 3. 6 6 - The City Engineer's Annual Report and a Revolution to Ievy and Collect assessments within Landscape Nsintseanee District Nos. 2. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6 6. (0401 -03 LANDSWE NA) • Staff report for Items E7 and BE veto presented by Jerry Fulvood. Resource Center Coordinator. Myor Stout opened the meeting for public bearing. Addrevai•.e City Council vast Don Thomas. representing Lewin Homes for Terra Vista. ezpremsed that they felt that apartment avenge should not have to pay the Name as • fall single -fNaily, unit, that Council should coaeidmr the ember of people per household. and that the number of people in multi -fatly =its was 1063. ?bars being no futtber public response, mayor Stout Closed the public bearing. RFSCLUTION NA. 88-372 A RRSCLDTTOH OF THE CITY COUNCIL 09 ME CITY OF RANCHO CICAMIC.A. CALIFORNIA. TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS VIMIN STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NOS. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5, 6 6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988 /89 PURSUANT TO ME LANDSCAPING AND LIMT]IA ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WIYA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. AND 6 REPORTS RESOLUTION NO. 88-373 A RESOLUTION Op THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Op RANCHO OICANANCA. C.4LIPORM. TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANfSt'APE HAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6 6 FOR TISSAL YEAR 1988 /89 PURSUANT TO THE IJUMCAPING AND L=T]-II ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH lATASCAFE PASNT!N.NCE DI2TRICT NOS. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. AND 6 HOTIONt Moved by Brown, wconded by King to adopt Resolution Nos. 86-372 and 88 -373. Notion eatried unanimously 5 -0. ♦ e e e s e City Council Minutes June 1. 1988 Page 20 Mayor Stout called a recess at 8:50 p.m. City Council reconvened at 9:05 p.m. with all members of the Council present. No items "baittid. a a a a a a r: - PUMIC MAXIMS aaaaaa C, CM MRMM(n1q Myr QlIATB (Items GI. C2 and G3 were considered together along with Item M. Environmental Assesa"t and Development District Amendment 88 -03- Pulsar Development. G1. ANNEXATION 88-01 - FOL4AR-DEVELOPMENP - A request to annex a portion of the San Bernardino County vtincorporated area located north of Highland Avenue. "nth of Summit Avenue extension, east of the Day Creek utility corridor, and vest of the County/City boundary - APH 225- 161 -19. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 49. 53. 55, and 61. (0702 -02 ANNEXATION) G2. AMMMATION -88-02 — T.P.- MBLCHER - A request to annex a portion of the San Bernardino County unincorporated area located on the north aide of 24th Street, ' east of the Southern California Edison Compaq power line corridor, and vent of t the current extension of Etivsnda Avant& APR 225-071 -65. (0702 -02 AHNSSATr0R) G3. ANNEXATION 68 -03 - CARYN- DEVELOPMENT- OOHPANY, xRTrUhNDA HIGHMANDSe - A request to annex 282 acres of land in the San Bernardino County unincorporated area located at the northeast corner of Summit Avenue and Wardress Bullock Road - APH 226-082 -16. 24-27. (0702 -02 ANNEXATION) Staff report presented by Larry Henderson. Sr. Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public bearing. Addressing Council were: Jolt* Rusdod, owner of parcel no. 57, considered this a rural arer and - felt that the people were not getting what they were really looking for. She also questioned why her lot was included in this annexation. She van against the annexation and wanted to see the area stay as rural an possible. Wayne Blanton, representing the property owner, stated that they agreed with the annexation. Joe D11orio, representing the Caryn Project, also concurred with the annexation. Councilvonan Wright asked staff what the advantages were of this annexation. City Council Minutes Rune 1, 1988 Page 21 Mr. groutil. Deputy City Planner, responded that there ware few advantages to the annexation, but a lot of disadvantages if it was not annexed. We would not have control mar traffic, drainage, development and etc., which would impact our City if this remained in the romtyt• control. Coumeilwasan Brown ex7reoad that she could accept the annexation because the diadvauttges were a great. RESOLUTION NO. 88-374 A RESOLUTION OP TAR CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO QUGNONCA. CALIFORNIA. DECLARING. 1N7ENT TO PURSUE A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AND REQUESTING IRE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMNCBSION TO TARE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE. SCOTH OF SUMMIT AVENUE EXTENLSION, PAST OF THE DAI CREEE UTILITY CORRIDOR. AND NEST OF THE COUNTY /CITY ROUKURY - APH 225 - 161 -19-. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 49. 53. 55. AND 61 RESOLUTION NO. 88-315 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RAMCED COGNDICA. CALIFORNIA, POR APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL AS THE GOVERNING, BODY OF ME CITY OF RANCHO COCANOWA. CALIFORNIA. MC2ARING INTENT 10 PURSUE A CHANCE OP ORGANIZATION AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION CONUQSSION TO UNDERTAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET, EAST OF THE SOOYDEDN CALIT RNIA EDISON COMPANY POWER LINE CORRIDOR, AND WEST OF THE CURRENT EXTENSION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE - API 225 -71-65 RESOLUTION NO. 88-376 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA. FOR APPLICATION BY THE CITY - - COUNCIL AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COC&HONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENT TO PURSUE A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AND RHOUBSTINC THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Ill UNDERTAXB PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF 282 ACRES OF LAND IN THE SAN BERNARDINO COULTT UNINCORPORATED AREA LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORIMR OF SUMMIT AVEUE AND WARDMAN BULL40CK GOAD -APH 226 -082 -16. 24-27 MOTIONt Moved by Xing. seconded by Buquet to apprme Resolution Nos. 88 -374, 88-375 and 88 -376. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. a a a a a a City Council Minutes June 1. 1988 Page 22 G4. 'IEEE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE UPDATE. Staff report was presented by Debra Maier. Associate Plenner. 02032T2 TREES) Council provided the following general guidance to the staff: 1. Recognize the Eucalyptus /glue Got trees present a problem In most situations. 2. Don't allow discriminate removal of trees. 3. look at the Htlwanda area. where we can find areas where treea can be Preserved. ACTIOU: Council gava the direction to put the 0uideliaea in the Vork Program. f a a a e e r C5. CONSIDEWTION OP -THE TOY CON - ORDINANCE. Staff report presented by James Markman. City Attorney. 1501 -09 GUMS) Councilwoman Vrigbt ezpreasod that she liked the Loa Angolan and Santa Mouton r, ordinances and felt that we should adapt amething similar. After considerable discussion. the Council decided the following: ACTION: Council concurred to wait and see what the State and Federal Governments would be doing in this utter. (Councilwoman Vrigbt still desired that we adopt an ordinance similar to Loa Angeles' and Santa !onion's.) e e � • e H. OOU11= WSTIESS Hl. CONSIDERATION 70 OPPOSE - MEASURE -A -- Creation of the new Mojave County. (0704 -00 LEGAL) (Comcilun Euguat stepped aside on this issue since he woe employed with for County and felt that there night be a conflict of interest. although the City Attorney assured bin that there was not.) Mayor Stout opened the nesting for public input. Addressing Council vast San Punter. who urged Council not to take action on this natter. There being no furtber public input. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. ACTIONS Council concurred to not take a stand on thin issue. •mite• �a { 1 City Council Munroe Jme 1. 1988 Page 25 r1 R2. CONSIDERATION TO-AMEND- USE OF TERM -FOR TEMPORARY USES. 'r. r" Councilwoman Brown stated that she bad am* concerns regarding the large tents that were up for long periods of time. She felt that perhaps we covld brie [y something in our policy where teats of a certain size need to come down in fifteen (15) days, where the smaller ones could stay up longer. She stated ' that she would like to have this go back to the Planning Co Izffion, to look at r- these requirements. (802 -08 TOP) ACTIONS Council concurred. tt•ttf l A3. CONSIOLBATION -01 APPOINfMeNf TO-7116 RANCHO COCANONGA- COIOUHITY FOUNDATION j; BOARD OF-DIRACIORS. 0701 -01 COMMISSION MDTIONt Moved by Aright, seconded by Buquet to appoint Mr. Sensenbacb. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. f t f f f t 'i Iv TDa1rIHIC►TIo1 OF _M" IM -1QT Comm I2. Councilman King requested the ism regarding the fence around Red Rill Park Lake be placed on the agenda one more time. I2. Councilman Buquet requested an item regardi.g the showing of a video which the County was making be place on the agenda fm discussion. f*♦ * *t J. ODM MCATIOM FROM THE PUBLIC Addressing Council was Draymond Crawford. 7939 Scroll Avon=. Fontana, a deacon from tb* Love-Ia Church. Mr. Crawford informed Council that they would be trying to put in a 2C2 -unit HUD Senior Citizen Project at I -15 and Bastline. ACIIONt Council directed bin to talk with sta'f. * * • f a f Ka ADJOUMNOW LOTION% Moved by King. seconded by Buquet to adjourn. lotion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 11105 p.m. Reapectfully submitted, Beverly A. Autbelet City Clerk A June 13, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Meeting .is.6 A. CALL To ORDER a An adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on J'- Monday, June 13, 1988, in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The mating van called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembars: Deborah N. Brow, Charles J. Buquet III Pamela J. Wright (arrived at 6130 p.m.), and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Manager, q Robert A. Rizrcj City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet; Senior Administrative Assistant, Mark R. Lorimar; Community Development director, Jack Lam; Treasurer, Jams Frost; Administrative Services Director, Jim Hart; Assistant Finance Director, Elizabeth Stoddard; Coccunity Services Manager, Joa Schultz; Resource Canter Coordinator, Jerry Fulvandl City Plamars Brad Buller; City Engineer, Russell Maguire; Deputy City Engineers Bill Silva; Senior Civil Engineer, Shintu �+ Boss; Senior Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeau; Associate Civil Engineer, Joe Stofa; Public Works Engineers Monte Preacher( Senior Public Works Inspector, Mika Long; Maintenance Superintendent, Dave Blevins; Parks Supervisor, Jeff Sarnarf Engineering Administrative Assistant, Duane Baker; Engineering Senior Office Assistant, Diane Whyte; Building Officials Jerry Grant; Deputy Sheriff, Tom Wick". Absent vas Counciloember: Jeffrey Ring. r ei *te B. CONSENT CALENDAR el. Approval to accept a Real Property Ivprovemaot Contract and Lien Agreemut (OD 88 -079) and approval of Parcel Map 9349, located on the south side of Strang, Lane, east of Carnalian Avenue, submitted by Brian Samuel Smith. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -377 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IN?ROVENEHr CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM BRIAN SAMUEL SMITH AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME RESOLUTION NO. 88 -378 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 9349 (TENTATIVE PARCEL KAY NO. 9349) City Council Minutes , June 13, 1988 Page 2 MOIIONt Moved by Brow, seconded by Buqust to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried by the following worst AYES: Brow, Buquet, Stout NOES None ABSENIt rJug, Wright (Councilwoman Wright arrived at 6130 p.m.) �. * * a * a a C. CITr Mk= ='S STAFF RcroRTS Cl. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDCEr FOR FISCAL YEAR 3988 -89. 1. Mr. Wasserman stated there were two meoo's before Council, one regarding response times, and me regarding gang activity. ACTION: Council received and filed the reports, they bad no questions. 2. Discussim of Engineering Budges Russell Maguire, City Engineer, want over the maintenance and capital improvement program. (Councilman Buquet left at 7:00 p.m.) Councilwoman Brown inquired about the City', graffiti program and wbother Maintenance oas contacting the Sheriff's Department before removing graffiti. Mr. Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent, respooded that they ware beginning to do this, but a formal program had not bean developed. Councilwoman Brow requested that a formal program be developed for the removal of graffiti. She alto inquired into ways we could work with utility companies and the railroad. 3. Discussion of Revenue Assessment Budget: Council had not questions. a * * a * ♦ " D. AD100REMM Mayo- Stovc adjourned the meeting at 8:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authilet City Clerk Approvedt a a v; July 6, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONCA CITY Council M11=S Regular Meetins A. CALL TO ORDER l: }�•, A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rambo Cucamonga met on .': Wednesday, July 6, 1988, in the Lion's Park Comity Center, 9161 Base Line r Road, Rambo Cucamraga, California. The meeting vas called to order at 1630 i% p.m. by Mayor Dennis 1. Stout. Present ware Councilmembers: Deborah N. Broun, Charles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey Ring, Pamela J. Wrighq and Mayor Dennis 1. Stouts Also present were: Assistant City Manager, Robert A. Rizzo; City Clerk, Beverly A. Authaletz Deputy City Attorney, Andrew Arczynski; City Planner, Brad Uller; City Engineer, Russell Ma;uire; Public Works Engineer, Monte Preacher) Deputy City Engineer, Bill Silva. A, e e e f e B. ANNOONCBMBMYS/PRRSENTATIORS f` Bl. Presentation of commendation for Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager. s ' 82. Announcement of the 1988 Bicentennial Photography Contest vinuers. B3. Preaentation of a proclamation recognizing Ju' as Park and Recreation Month. 84. Presentation of proclamations to Richard Shore and Karl Cox recognizing their efforts towards emergency preparednass. ` s e a e e e C. CONSENT Calendar Cl. Approval of Minutes: Mal 18, 1988 C2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos, 6115/88, 6/22188, and 6/29/88, and Payroll ending 6/23/88 for the total amount of 88,052,491.60. C3. Approval to receive and file currant Investment Schedule as of June 27, 1988. C City Council Minutes July 6, 1988 Page 2 C4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer A Wine Hating Place, Chios Star Restaurant, Ana 6 Johnson Yang, 9638 Base line Need. C5. Approval of the appropriation of $40,ODO from Reserves to account cumber 01 -4285 -6028 for the payment of the City's portion of the County Library Bcaovation. C6. Approval to adopt the declaration of trust of the ICHA Retirement trust. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -414 A RESOLUTIONA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhONGA, CALIFORNIA. ADOPTING THE DECLARATION OF TRUST OF THE INTE&MIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT TRUST C7. Approval to appoint officers and agents to accept deeds on behalf of the City (Superceding Resolution No. 82 -83). RESOLUTION NO. 68-415 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING OFFICERS AND AGENTS TO ACCEPT 7EE16 ON BEHALF OF THE CITY (SUPERCEDING RESOLUTION MO. 82 -83) C8. Approval to summarily vacate rn unused City Emergency Access Basement, located betveen drven Avenue and Dakota Avenue, south of Victoria Street. RESOLUTION NO. 88-416 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMHAHILY ORDERING TIM VACATION OT A CITY EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT C^. Approval of Parcel Map 10941 located on the vast side of Lucas Ranch Road, . north of Fourth Street, submitted by Turner Development. RESOLUTION NO. 88-417 A RESOLUTION OF THE Cr'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10941 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10941) CIO. Approval of map, execution of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13318, located on thv southeast corner of Hemesa Avenue and ■ 4 City Council minutesl�; July 6, 1988 Page 3 Manzanita Drive, submitted by Nayflover- Bayoun, a California General Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 88.418 A RLTSOLUTIOU OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ACREBIL"Mr, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL NAP OF TRACT NO. 13318 C11. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for CUP 87 -19 (Phase I) located on the vest aide of Jasper Street, between Lomita Drive and Sierra Vista Street, submitted by Sierra Vista Baptist Church. RESOLUTION NO. 88-419 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 87 -19 (PHASE I) C12. Approval to execute Inproeement Agzeement and Improvement Security for DR 87 -52, located at 112434 Fourth Street submitted by Pic "Ne Save Distribution Cantor. RZSOLVIION NO. S"20 t• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO " CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND c IMPROVEMENT SECURITY VOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 87 -52 C13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for 680P Hellman Avenue, submitted by Laszlo Vass. ABSOLUTION NO. 88 -421 A RES..UfION OF TO CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 6609 HELLMAN AVENUE C14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13715, located vest of Sapphire Street on the northeast corner of Exeter Court and Jennet Street, submitted by Walton Management Services, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 88-422 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13715 City Council Minutes, July 6, 1988 Page 4 C15. Approval to execute Improveseat Agreement Extonaion for DR 85 -32, located on the north side of Civic Center Drive, east of Utica Avenue, submitted by Forecast Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 88-423 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT RXMSIOM AND IMPROVEMENT SECORIYY FOR DR 85 -32 C16. Approval to execute Improvement Agreeannt Extension for Tract 10246, located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue, submitted by Luther Alkhaseh. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -024 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OX RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EKIEH9ION AND IMEROVEMENY SECURITY FOR TRACT 10246 C17. Approval to reject all bids as nonresponsive to the needs of the City for the White Alder Tree Removal and Replacement in Tract 11934, located vest of Victoria Par$• Lane and north of the Southern Pacific Railroad in the Victoria Planned Community, and authorize readvertizi•g of the project to be funded from landscape Maintenance District. No. 2 - Account No. 41- 4130 -8769 vith a loan from Beautification Punds.. RESOLUTION NO. 88-425 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "WHITE ALDER TREE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMEWT" IT. TRACT 11934, LOCAL-RD WEST OF VICTORIA PARR LAMP AND NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD IN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMHVNIYY, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS CIE. Approval to reject all bids as submitted for the Tryon Street Sidewalks, located vast of Archibald Avenue, as nonresponsive to the o2ads of the City and authorize readvartising of the project to be funded from Pedestrian Grants /Article 3 - Account No. 16- 4637 -8717. RESOLUTION NO. 88-426 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AMD SPECIFICATIONS City Council NinutSa July 6, 1988 Page 5 FOR THE "THICK STREET SIDEWALKS, WEST OF AHCHIB IBALD AVENUE ", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C19. Approval to authorise the advertising o: "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Archibald Avenue Widening Project between Highland Avenue and Leann Avenue to be funded from System Development Food, Account Nn. 22 -4637 -8756. RESOLUTION NO. 88-427 UA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CONNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARCHIBALD AVENUE WIDENING PRDJECr ", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLHRs: TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C20. Approval to authorize the advertising of "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of Grove Avarua at 8th Street and Atchson, Topeka and the Santa Fe Railroad Crossing Improvement Project, to be funded from system Development Fund, Account No. 22- 46378751 FAU Section 203, Account No. 17- 6637 -8776, and Article 8, Account No. 12.4637 -8783 and TDA 4637 , Article 8 - Account No. 12- 4637 -8783. RESOLUTION N0. 88-428 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS POR "THE CONSTRUCTION OF GROVE AVENUE AT 8TH STREET AND ASCHISON, TOPEKA AND THE SANTA FE RAILROAD CROSSING I14'ROVENENr PROJECT ", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING TIM CITY C_.ERX TO ADVERTM: TO RECEIVE BIDS C21. Approval to award the Sapphire Trails Landscaping and Reconstruction Improvement Project located South of Banyan Street, to Joe Halz Construction Company, Incorporated for the amount of $81,596 to be funded from Beautification Fund, Account No. 21- 4647 - 8723. C22. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -089) for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement Project at Highland Annue and Hillihen Avanue, awarded to Hovey Electric, Incorporated, for for amouut of $90,000 ($81,332 plus JOY contingency) to be funded from TDA Article 8 Fund - Account Ito. 12- 4637 -8708. C23. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -090) for the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phase I1 Improvement Project from Foothill Boulevard to 6th Street awarded to 3-1 Enterprises Corporation for the amount of $37,650.50 to he funded from Pedestrian Create ArLiele 3, Account No. 16 -4637 -8716. 'a City Council Nlnuteo m July 6, 1988 - +.'.i' Page 6 , R C24. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -091) for the Slurry Seal Program, Phase II9 FY 87108 Improvement Project awarded to Pavement Coating Company for the •x• amount of $73,100 ($66,384.66 plus 1OT contingency) to be funded free SB 300 f Fundo - Account No. 15- 4637 -8050. C25. Approval to execute contract (00 88 -092) for tha Hillside Road Stom Draia and Street 7mprovenect Project from Malachite Avenue to Archibald Avenue awarded to Laird Construction Company, Incorporated for the mount of $4759600 ( ($432,360.80 plus 1OI contingency) to be funded from System Development Fund, Account No. 22- 4637 -8 ?48 and City-wide Drainage Fund Account No. 23- 4637 -8802. C26. Approval to execute contract (00 88 -093) for the Lion Street Improvement Project located between Atchison, Topeka and Santa Pa Railroad and Ninth Street, awarded to J.B.G. Construction Company, Incorporated for the mount of $57,000 ($51,747.10 plus 102 contingency) to be funded from Capital Reserve t Fund, Aeeount No. 25 -0285 -8804. C27. Approval to execute contract (00 88 -094) for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement Project at Highland Avenue and Etfvanda Avenue, awarded to Hovey Electric, ;o.^.orporated, for the amount of $102,600 ($93,255 plus 102 contingency) to be funded from IDA Article 8 Fund - Account No. 12 -0637 -8707. C28. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -095) for the Construction of Maintenance Facility Improvement Project at Red Hill Community Park awarded to Bopark Enterprises. Incorporated, for the amount of $1529900 0139,000 pluo 10% contingency) to be funded free Capital Improvement Facilities, FY 87/88 - Account No. 01 -4647 -7043 (FY 87/88). REWMD FOR DISCUSSION AS REQUESTED BY COUNCILWOMAN WRIGHT. L'29. Approval to execute contract (GO 88 -096) for the Btiwanda Storm Drain, line +�• 2 -1, Phase I, Improvement Project located vest of I -15, north of Victoria Straet from the Victoria Basin to north of Highland Avenue and f..ture Route 30 Freeway, awarded to Albert W. Davits. Incorporated, for the amount of $657,100 ($597,3:0 plus 101 continawy) to be funded from Drainage Fund - Account No. 19- 4637 -8154. C30. Approval to execute Agreement (CO 88 -097) for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication 9etween Clarke H. Bowen and Marjorie C. Bowen and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements along 9529 19th Street, located on the south side of 19th Street between Archibald Avenue and Authyat Street. RESOLVIIOM NO. 88-429 A RESOLVIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM c City Council Minutes s July 6, 1988 Pass 7 CLARKS H. BOESER AND MABJORIE C. BOESEN, AND AUTHDRIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAM C31. Approval to execute contract change order No. 5 (CO 87 -20) for a Professional Services Agreement with Don Creek and Associates to continue design administration for the Alta Loma Assessment District 84 -2. It is recommended to expand their contract by $10,000 to bring their contract total to $29,752. C32. Approval Lo execute contract change order No. 3 (CO 87 -20) for a Professional Services Agreement vitb Don Greek and Associates to continue design administration for Banyan Street Extension. It is recommended to expand their contract by $5,000 to bring their contract total to $18,799.50. C33. Approval to accept improvements, release bonds and file a Notice of Completion fors Tract 13062 located on the north side of 19th Street. between Amethyst and Arehibald Avenue. Releases Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $261,000 Accepts Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 26,100 RESOLUTION NO. 88-630 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENIS FOR TRACT NO. 13062 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR 'INS WORE DR 86 -14 located on the east side of Haven Avenue, mouth of Civic Center Drive. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 2,500 RESOLUTION NO. 88-431 ` A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVENBMS FOR DR 86 -14 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Tract 12670 -1 through -4 located south side of Base Line Road between Spruce and Hil liken Avenues_ Releases Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $829,953 4'.S City Council Minutes July 6, 1988 Page 8 Acceptt Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 92,995 w t RESOLUTION NO. 88-432 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO YE COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 12670 -1 THROUGH -4 AND AUTHORIZING INS FILING OF �. A NOTICE OF COMPLETION PON THE VORK §:. Parcel lisp 8842, located on Terra Vista Perkrav east of Spruce Avenue. w -- Faithful Perfo:manee Bond (Street) $ 82,000 .;a RESOLUTION NO. 88-433 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO -- CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR PARCEL NAP 8842 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE MIOBK Tract 11577, located op the vest side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Base Line Road. r Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 49,000 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 4,900 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -434 A RESOLUTION OF Tae CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 11577 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Tract 12833. located ?n the southvesL corner of Victoria Park Lane and south of Victoria Windrows Loop. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $649,360 Accepts Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 64,936 RESOLUYION NO. 88-435 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMELTS FOR TRACT 12833 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes July 6, 1988 Page 9 Tract Nos. 10802. 10802 -1, -2. -3� — 4,-5,. and -6. located on the southeast corner of Mountain View Drive and Spruce Avenue. Releass:Street Faithful Performance Accepts Street Maintenance Guarantee TR 10802 $201,500 $20,150 TR 10802 -1 $605,400 $60,540 TR 10802 -2 $253,000 $25,300 TR 10802 -3 $ 77,000 $ 7,700 TR 10802 -4 $123,000 $12,300 TR 10802 -5 $184,000 $18,400 TR 10802-6 $276,000 $27,600 RESOLUTION NO. 88-436 A RESOLUTION OF INS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 2703. 10802, 10802 -1, 10802 -2, 10802 -3, 10802 -4, 10802- 5, AND 10802 -6, AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TEE NORR C34. Approval to accept improvements, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract No. 12672, located on the <mthvest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Spruce Avenue. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 4,759 C35. Approval for funding from fund 20 (park development funds) to proceed in cooperation with Engineering, to acquire land (APR 209- 041 -17) imnediately adjacent and east of Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center for future parking lot expansion. C36. Approval of a partial release of the Improvement Security for Tract 12870 pertaining to the Victoria Bastn and the Etivanda Storm Drain, located on the north side of Highland Avenua, between Etivands and East Avenues, submitted by AAM %vestments, a California General Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 88-437 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIM CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PARTIAL RELEASE OF THE IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12870 (VICTORIA BASIN AND STINANOA STORM CHAIN) C37. Approval of $44,000 to purchase and install radio equipment for the Emergency Operations Cester from Motorola Corporation based on the San Bernardino County radio equipment bid contract. ti v V- City Council Minutes July 6, 1988 Page 10 i' C38. Set public hearing for August 3, 1988 - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -03 - SMITH - Appeal of the Planning Commission decision requiring 1) im -lieu fees for utility undergrounding and (2) off -site street improvements for the development of a 20 unit apartment complex on 1.08 acres of land in the Madium-High Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), located at the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street - AYH 201 -251- 22. C39. Set public hearing for August 3, 1988 - Approval of the 19th Street Improvements (vest City limits to Jasper Avenue) Environmental Assessment Review. RESOLUTION NO. 88-438 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP LANCED CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND SETTING A PUBLIC NEARING W.TE ON WEDHESDAY, AUGUST 3, 1988 FOR TUC PROPOSED 19TH STREET ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT REVIEW CAD. Set public hearing for August 3, 1988 - Approval of the 19th Street Improvements (Hermosa to Cartilla) Environmental Assessment Review, RESOLUTION NO. 88 -039 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL UP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 3, 1988 FOR THE PROPOSED 19TH STREET ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW 041. Set public hearing for August 31 1988 - Approval to Amen T -act No. 13318, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa and Manzanits, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexation No. 31. RESOLUTION NO. 88-440 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO _ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY EHGINEER'S-RErORT FOR ANNEXATION 90. 31 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 88-441 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCC DISTRICT 90. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 31 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT City Council Minutes July 6, 1988 Page It NO. 21 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIM AND PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS THERSr0 C42. gat public nearing for August 3, 1988 - Approval to Antax Tract No. 13318, Parcel Map 10941, CUP 87 -19, CUP 87-12, DR 86.08, DR 87-41, and De 87 -52 (various locations throughout the City) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 47. RESOLUTION N0. 88-442 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LMIATION R0. 47 TO STREET LIGHTING MAnITSNANC9 DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 08-443 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CAORCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INIENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION IO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 47 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. IM PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LILTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOX HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C43. Set public hearing for August 3, 1988 - Approval to Anna: Parcel Nap 10941, DR 87 -52 and CUP 87 -19 (Industrial /COanercial) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 18. RESOLUTION NO. 88-444 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 18 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 88-445 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 18 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LILTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TINS AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C44 Set public hearing for August 3, 1988 - Approval to Ann" Parcel Map 10941, D8 86 -08, D8 87 -52 and CUP 87 -19 (Industrial /CO =etCLet) to Landscape City Council Minutes July 6, 1988 Page 12 Maintennuce District No. 3 as Annexation No. 22. RESOLUTION N0. e8 -446 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF To CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNI6, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY d ENCINEER' REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 22 TO LANDSCAPE W.DMSANCS DISTRICT N0. 3 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -047 A HHSOLVrIoa OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO CUC&NUNCA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER TUB ANNEXUIOH DESIGNATING IGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 22 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENAHCE DISTRICT N0. 31 pu&SUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AHD LIGHT ND ING ACT OF 1972 A OyFEgLWC A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO CAS. Set public bearing for August 3, 1988 - Approval to Annex Tract NO2- 13318, located eape Maintesanee District NO, 1 of as RESOLUTION No.a49. Mansanita Driver to RESOLUTION N0. 88-448 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF Tug CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 49 TO LANDSCAPE HAIMTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WoLUTION N0. 88-449 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 01 I TO ORDER THE NNE CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS IN18 �, AXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 11 AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESICNA:ING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 49 TO LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCB DISTRICT 110. li OURSUANT TO TUB TIME AND PL.CB Y0E HEARING LIGHTING �ro -- CAN. Set public hearing for August 3, 1988 - An ordinance to amend the vesting f regulation o nonresidential tsubdivisionssubdivision ordinance to include the tentative map 66ctlod of Councilwoman Wright requested that Item Number C28 be removed for discussion. seconded by Xing to approve the balance of the Consent M(ITIONt Moved by Brew, Calendar minus Item ..unber C28. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. 'I. i City Council Minutes July 6, 1988 Page 13 Rfiiei Discussion of Item C28. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -095) for the Construction of Iaintenance Facility Improvement Project at Bed Dill Community Park awarded to Bopark Enterprises, Incorporated, for the amount of $152,900 ($139,000 plum 102 contingency) to be funded from Capital Improvement Facilities, FY 87/88 - Account No. 01 -4647 -7043 (7Y 87/88). Councilvoman Wright inquired into what was actually being proposed to be done, and if it was an original part of the park. Russell Maguire, City Engineer, responded that this was part of the nester plan for the park; the purpose was for the operational maintenance of the park. MOTIONS Moved by Wright, seconded by ring to approve Item Number C28. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. assess D. CONSENT ORDIMANCKS (Staff requested that Items D3 and D4 be continued for two weeks). City Clerk Authelat read the title of Ordinance Nos. 359 and 360. D1. GUNSTRUUTLON - A request to amead the Development District Designation of Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residtatial (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 15 acres, located at the north side of Highland Avenue, south of Ltmon Avenue extension and vest of Deer Creek Channel - APR Portions of 201 - 271 -34 and 41, Rod 201- 271 -02. ORDINANCE NO. 359 (second reeding) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 88 -01 REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DISTRICT _ DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR 15 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUE EXTENSION, AND WEST OF THE DEER CREEK CHANNEL, RANCHO CUCAMOINGA, CALIFORNIA, - APH PORTIONS OF 201- 271 -34 AND 41 (SEE EXHIBIT "A ") AND APH 201- 271-42 D2. run nu wcA+w - An amendment to Beetion 17.08.070 -C, 17.12 -030 -01 end the addition of Section 17.10 -050-0 of the Development Code pertaining to the parking and storage of vehicles on private property in the Residential, C nest ercial mad industrial Districts. s Cit; Council Hinutes July 6, 1988 Pogo 14 ORDINANGE N0. 360 (second reading) - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITT of RANCHO CUCAHONCA rx- IFORNIA, APPROVING DSVELOPHZMT CODE AMHUNENT 88 -04, Z;RDINC SUBSECTION 17.08.070 -C AND 17.12.030 -B, AND TO THE PERTAINING NEW PARRINC MM STSORAGE OF VEHICLESL OR PRIVVA18 PROPERTY WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL /01FICE AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS D3. ENVIROHNENTAL ASSESSMerrc anu un.atm!V4..-_ - RAN cur- rentl� - An to�Vi�riaoYlsn¢ed Ceomuni7n(V.YC.) for televen� LT ea: within the Victoria Planned Community - APH 227 -011-8 through Ili 217 -091-4, 45r 56; 227- 411 -751 227 -091-9, 26, 49r 50{ 227 -091 -18 through 22, 73, 43; 227- 111 -1, 211-7, IS 227-161-10 227 �211-3, 30�ndItc+ eontienedOtonnJuly 20,71988. 217 - ORDINANCE N0. 361 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOHGA, CALIFOdNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 4TRICC DESIGNATIONS rAS TiD1Y DC DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY HIL9T, TO VICTRIA VPC) FOR ELEVEN AREAS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY ( PLANNED COmHUNITY AREA - APH 22) -011 -08 THROUGH 111 227-091- 04, 45, 56; 227 -011 -75; 227,11-09, 26, 49, 501 227 -091 -18 10' THROUGH 24, 22, 227-111,-27, 30 227-01-21; ' 38; 1 1227 1211 -07,128,139; 10, 021 25{ 229 -021 -581 AND 227 - 211 -03, 30 D4. SNVIRONMSNrwr. N� ^� -^"••• ._ .:...._- CITY Ot RANCHO CUCAMOMCA - An aneudnent s1,; eleven areas o 227- 411 -75; Planned Gotunity - APN 227 -011 -08 through 111 227-091-04, -,ii- 91613], 7gi 227- 227-091-09, 26, 49, 501 22T -091 -18 through 22, 25, -171-211 227- 021 18; and 227 -10, 24, 0 2I -1 1-27, 30; 221 02120, 1988211 -0?, 28, 391 229 - ORDINANCE 110. 362 (second reading) -- A_ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF To CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VIrYDRIA PLANNED COMHUNIIY AnNumEmr 88 -02, AN AaNDMENT TO AHNBI ELEVEN (11) AREAS WITdIN THE - LCrORIA COK-UNITY AREA TO THE VICTORIA FLAMED COMMUNITY - s ?N 227 -011 -08 THROUGH 111 227 -091 -04, 45, 561 227- 411 -751 227 -091 -09, 26, 49, 501 227 -091 -18 THROUGH 22, r �Sp 25, 431 227 - 111 -01, 33, 381 227 - 171 -191 227 - 161 -30, 24, 251 ` 227 - 111 -27, 301 227- 171 -211 227- 211 -07, 28, 391 229 -021 -581 ' ANC 227 - 211 -03, 30 NOTIONS Moved by Vrighq seconded by Buquet to continue Item D3 and D4 to Juty 20, 1988 meting. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. MOTIONS Moved by Wright, seconded by King to aive full reading of the Ordinances and to approve said Ordinances. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. •era ** r K. ADVERTISED PUBLIC EXARIMCS El. RESIDENTIAL AND OWBERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL REFUSE RATE REVIEW - City Council will consider a potential rate adjustment for refuse rates for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Staff report presentcd by Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager. Mayor Stout opened the meting for public hearing. Addressing Council vast Jams Frost, City Treasurer, expressed that Yukon Disposal had done a superb job during th.a clean swap week campaign. There being no further public input, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Vright expressed that the following information should be relayed to the general public$ 1) Notifying them of the rational for the increase (2) Informing them regarding the landfill problem (3) Recycling informtioa. Mr. Rizzo stated that ve could request the companies to do this as part of their billing process. Council concurred that staff should follow-up in this area, but that anything going out from the companies be revieved by staff first. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -050 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CN.IFORNIA, SETTING MAXIMUM RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMRCIAL /INDUSTRIAL REFUSE COLLECTING wnm THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC:.HW G& MOTION$ Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brow to approve Resolution No. 88 -050. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. A, * * * a a E2. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION 41THI Staff report presented by Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager. •�� x�T City Council Minutes July 6, 1988 Page 16 0 C Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hesricg. There heing no response; the public hearing vas closed. A. RESOLUTION NO. 88-451 A RESOLUTION OP THE C'_TY COUNCIL OF TIM CITY OF RANCHO +� CUGANQiGON wM \ AND ANNEXATION CCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR RACLH NOS- 12650. 12650 -4, 13715, 13697 AND 13742 D. woLUTLON N0. 83-452 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CL2T OF RANCHO CUGMONG, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE NORII IN CONNECTION WITH ANNIX&TION go. 46 No I AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL I6NTCINEEH S REPORT FOR FORS TRACT NOG. 12650, 12650 -4, 13715, 13697 AND 13742 RPSOLV TIOH FA. 88-453 A EESOI.VTIOII OF THE CITY C. CCIL OF TIM CITY UP RANCHO MCANONG, aLIPORIIIA, ORDERING- T`J6 WOar IN CONNECTION =11 NO. ANNE72 AND ACCEPTING THE PLNALI EZIOLNESA'S FEPMAINTENANCE TT FOR TFACT NOS. 12550, 12650 -4, 13715, 13697 AND 13742 NOTION? Moved by King, seconded by Stout S.0 spp :ova Resolution Nas. 88 -051, 88- 452 and 88 -453. Motion tarried uasnimnasly 5-0. e a A, a e e y. PUB LTC_PEA3a71CS Fl. HUNICIre1. WU- •• -Y° .__ ANNEXATIONS t0 v1CT06IA PLANNED CON1NNiiY - An amendment o u of�0stocn gdrainageR fees to cpropurtie i ccuaazad�to P[Lea Victo is Specific ePlaan c, Staff report presented by Bill Silva, De;•uty city Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the mating for publin hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Authelat read the title of Ordimnca No. 363. ORDINANCE NO. 363 (first reeding) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF INS CITY 07 RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUBSECTION 13.08.0408 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO STORM DRAINAGE PEES r MfOTIONt Nomad by Bugaet, seconded by Wright to waivo full reading of said ,M Ordinance. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brow to set encond reeding for July 20, 1988. Motion carried 4 -1-0 (King - Nn). Councilman King explained that he did not agree with the annnrntion within the planned community. e erase C. CITY MANACIR'S_STAFF REPORTS Cl. CONSIDERATION OF MATTERS FOR TIM NOVEMBERS, 1988 BLECfION. Staff report presented by Beverly Authelet, City Clerk. Discussion followed regarding the $200 filing fee recommended by staff. Councilman King and Councilwoman Brow both expressed opposition to the filing fee. Councilwoman Wright expressed that she felt a candidate should pay the $200 fee or be able to collect something in -lieu of the fee. Mr. Arexynski, Deputy City Attorney, pointed out that ve did not know the impact of Proposition 73, but it did look lika it would be illegal for the taxpayer to underwrite election campaigns. Councilman Buquet expressed that he had problems with the general fund picking up costs for the election. RESOLUTION NO. 88-454 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, GILIPORHIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HZLD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, THE I S- City Council Ninates July b, 1988 Page 18 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1988, FOR THE EIECTIOH OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF TIM STATE Of CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES, AND CONSOLIDATING SAID ELECTION WITH STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SAID DATE RESOLUTION NO. 88-655 A RESOLUTION OF TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS OF THE CANDIDAXES STATEMENT FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE ROD IN TIM CITY ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1988 MOTIONS Moved by Buquat, seconded by Brow to approve Resolution No. 88 -654. Notion carried unanimously 5-0. NOTION: Moved by Ring, seconded by Brow to waive the $200 filing fee. Notion carried by the following voter AYES: Brow, Stout, Ring NOES: Buquet ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Wright MOTIONI Moved by Brow, seconded by ling to approve Resolution No. 88.455 mious the $200 filing fee. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Brown, Stout, ling NOES: Buquet ABSENTS Norte ABSTAIN: Wright Councilman Buquat requested that the City Attorney investigate this and how Proposition 73 affected it, because he felt this was illegal. e see ae G2. INQUIRY REGARDING ACCESS POLICY FOR HILLSIDE ROAD - Consideration of a resident request to provide for access to private property from Hillside Road. Staff report presented by Monte Freseher, Public Works Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council vas: f Mrs. Cheryl Bacteria, 8362 Hillside Road, expressed she wanted only what her neighbors had been permitted, and some had been permitted additional accesses. - MOTIONS Moved by Wrightt seconded by Brow to grant the request. Motion failed by the following voter AYES Brow, Wright NOBS, Buquet, Stout, Ling ABSENrt Beat Councilman Ling expressed that he could vote on this only if he could see more details of what they were proposing for that area, especially bow they were v, Coing to handle the grade differences. Mayor Stout stated he had never voted for an accost auto a secondary street like Hillside. Arco ±aakit Deputy City Attorney[ Pointed out that some of the pictures the a;plicamt had submitted had not been investigated by staff and perhaps had not received permits to do the changes. 3 ACTION: gave Bra. Ramrrir present new plans, and for the item to come back to i the City Council for reconsideration. * * * * * * a. COUNCIL 2031NUSS El. DISCUSSION OF PROCESS TO PILL VACANCY ON TIES PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION. Robert Elate, Assistant City Manager, pointed out that this should also include the Cities" Advisory Commission since Bob Thomas had resigned. ACTIONt Council concurred that the subcommittee's should look at the applications already on file. Public Safety Subcommittee, Councilwomen Wright and Brow; and the Advisory Commission Subcommittee, Councilwoman Brow end' Buquet R2. DISCUSSION OF APPCINTMBNT TO THE SOIL EROSION AND DUST PREVENTION COHNISSIOH. NOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Stout to appoint Councilman Buquet as representative, and Councilman Ring as alternate on said commission. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. * * * * * A a, h 4 'F.',`_ _ter %.e <i24e „`Y`:� .� .-��y.' ,i --.•- -.4 :- ,_'.. City Council Minutes July 6, 1988 Page 20 I. IMaMUTIOW or lama FOR Ia7Q HKETUG Mr. Arctynski, Deputy City Attorney, pointed out that the next Council abating would be adjourning to a closed session regarding litigation issues. f r f f f f J. COVAMCATIO/B BPAM Ing PUBLIC None submitted. f f f f f I L. ADJOURN)/, t hOTIONt Moved by Ling, seconded by Wright to adjourn the mating. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelet City Clark Approval: f y.�t 1 i °, - iii LIST ... ..,.JS` - -.[a+- ;. ?�'ti rs:3- "rice - eAweHa:wulaR�W 1 -�r PAYEE ----- - - - - -. -°- •---- ------ -- -- "--- - ITEM OFSU _ ....� �.- ..--- WARRN WAAR.ANI. - j,.. '• " -" - «. --------- - - - - -- '> I0e4 ppiNFRS HEALTH PLAN CNECAN OVERLAP MEDICAL INSURANCE 7 -1 -88 -- 19I15V -° yl: 1800 CANNON BALL IXP1 Sf 4 19176 4iM OF JULY ENTERTAINMENT RED HILL - 24!14 :24311• 27.9TO.I9 LZ' 14 1601 STEVE JOHNSON 24516 SOFTBALL STAFF 5 HOURS /PO 6-22 -88 - 24572 24517• - 250.00 -25.00 i, ±=• - IIBB S C E - 2A9 •4 - 24677 92H MAVEN C 6TH TRAF C TITHE ITEMS 246781 - 0.250.00 ` yj 1169 RISK MANAGEMENT PUBLISHING CO. 24619 SUBSCRIPTION THROUGH JUNE 69 /PD 61 - 24650 246914 "'`• -48.00 14 14 ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY Y AIRLINE TICKETS fACR41EN TO 24652 AIRLINE - 24998 24999• 7 W.00 TICKETS 260001 201.09 _ 1649 GAVLE NIERENGA 25001 - REFUND C455 N 7165 25167 `Y1 25166. -20.25 25169 25170 .^ 872 RONDA SULLIVAN PETTY CASH VARIOUS C OTHER ITEMS 25171 25172• 406.98, B67 1084 JOHN CA RL NARNECKE C ASSOCIATES PARTNERS HEALTH PLAN ARCHITECTURAL 41 ICE C OTHER ITEMS 25174. 13.110.00 COBRA MEDICAL -. - 25173• 219.91 S: .� 744 60 GREAT WESTERN SAVI9GS DELTA DENTAL PLAN CALIF DEFERRED COMP 7 -1-60 24176 26177 71a 41.00 1155 OF I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT CORPORATION 9f MTAI INS. JULY DEFERRED Camp T -T -08 25 {701 71971.40 .�." 1649 W7lE NIFRfNW REFUND ClBfi 7165 25179• 416.46 -.. 1492 SAM BERN CO FLOW I:OWTROI GIST. OAY CREEK CONSTRUCTION PHASE I 25180. 26101• 20.26 ,ot„ - 7901000.00 1 III A A EQUIPMENT AENIuIS Co., INC. A P 1 ALAFM SYSTEMS JOHN DEERE AERATOR 25102 - 25185 6 2,310.30 702.71 4t .77 1904 AARON BROTHERS ART MARTS BURGLAR ALARM SENVICE C ODRER ITEMS 26107 £ 1962 A1RAT WELDING fUPIIT COLO CONTEHPO ACET'ILENE /OXYGEN 21388 89.89 !' 1698 ALERT PUBLISHERS SURVIVAL KIT 25169 12.00 1901 1175 ROBIN ALEXANDER ALIGNMENT C BRAKE SPECI4LtSIS REFUND CLASS K 9222 25190 6.95 17 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. UN17 • 104 - ALIGN FACNT WNAELSIBAL 21192 449.95 957 ALTA LORA STATIONERY CHEMICALS /EXTINGUISHERS 25197 294.841. 1910 Ri IFTS THE APPLE COLLICIION OAY Ai A GI GLANCE DAPIE TALK CURS TALK CLIPSf 25194 6.91 1184 761 PATRICIA ASHBY 0 l R MILEAGE M[NT 25195 24.70 SUBSCRIPTION AT TO KNOW COMPLIANCE 20191 251.25 °, - iii 1-I2-6B list 0/ uauAelS- k�y 6A CENTRAL Cl TIES SIGN SFRUICE 69 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION NIGH SCROD 763 CHICR-S SPORI:NO GOODS Inc 74 CITY RENTALS 761 COCA -COLA OF LOS ANGELES 1190 COMMUNITY ENGINEERING SERVICES 647 COPPUTERLANO 862 COPY LINE COPP. 63 CUCAKONGA CO WATER GIST as CUCAMONGA CD W760 GIST O . 67 CUCAMONGA PRINTING 259 0 C F CONCRETE CO 92 04ILV REPORT 716 Of AS60ND CONSTRUCTION 679 DICKIES STANDARD INDUSTRIAL 1106 02AINAGE CONSTAK7ION 765 DYNO -R00 ICU, IMC. 525 EAf TMAN, INC 459 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE 124 FENCE CAAF1 DF UPLAND. INC. 1912 FLIGHT ODYSSEY -DALE WONG 116 FONTANA PAVING INC. 1062 FNAARLIN INSTPUTE 1057 G T E L 1907 C M SURFACES 1907 SAM GAl6RAifR 1906 STAN GASDEN 157 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 7 - --- -RANCHO CUCAAUNGA� PA2E4 ] Tim, CfftP MA46••�NARR.AnT. C`GixER TIE Mf 26196 'M+'• -2 X065.00 6'9177 76199 70.00 1SLSEMENT °S 8700 90.00 S- 065- CARRIE/NtRISSIE 26201 10.00 6 9721"- f26202 20.00 IORSENENT 27201 160.00 6 9021 25204 20.00 3HIP-M NES$ LICENSE 6/69 26205 7,700.00 IAVISTA.-OTHER OTHENIE 26206 4..71 IA VISTAfOTNER PROJE Cif 26207 i.l 16. Pf 27206 56.62 42 25239 6.16 25210 9.76 L ALLU IHEON 26212 540.67 /6ICENTfNNIAI IUHLNET$ 25212 961.56 STAAF S /AA SRETH14 NETS 26214 62.32 Pluf 616 C OTNF9 STEWS 27215 17.50 26215 17.00 CHECA P COORDINATION 25216 912.20 NITERS 6 /il TO 7 /II 26216 466.62 Anon A J6 C OTHER ITEMS 25219 1,560.46 AN AYE P C OTHER ITEMS 75220 T.205.02 0,000 /6/C 700 25221 177.41 96 52601 C OTHER ITEMS 25222 I.2T1.21 AL C OTHER IIENf ^5721 2,141.51 PATE /PO C OTHER TICKS 15224 11.121.57 LS/ETC. L OTHER ITSNS 76226 664.55 ENT N0. 5 77226 52.940.90 NE lil N. GROVE 23221 64.50 L BINDER C DINER ITEMS 25226 816.8, DAY 25229 17.62 IALS 252)0 68.73 ONS TETUEREO.INSURANCE 25211 '2.160.00 MATE NO. C OTHER ITE45 26272_ 11.026.26 ISTCH JULY 68 25711 252.10 USINESS LICENSE 25225 109.00 R Tin MIS 10.00 JiINESf LICENSE 25217 1•.16 C OTHER ITEPS 26238 7.499.05 it e ^FAYEF� ...............�....�� a 961 B S I CONSULTANTS. INC. -, 18V9 JANICE BARBEE 1696 JEFF BARNES 1632 CAROL BEACH 1900 DONALD BL401STON - �•q 1062 PORN2IN R. BRAIT 1696 OTANI BRIGGS % 1697 C C A N INNOVATION GROUP 1912 C.N.B. FOODS I6C. s, 166 C.I.A. 14GIHFiRlk2 CONSULTANTS - 1907 CALIFORNIA BICENTENNIAL d 1906 CALIFORNIA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 616 CALIFORNIA CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC 6A CENTRAL Cl TIES SIGN SFRUICE 69 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION NIGH SCROD 763 CHICR-S SPORI:NO GOODS Inc 74 CITY RENTALS 761 COCA -COLA OF LOS ANGELES 1190 COMMUNITY ENGINEERING SERVICES 647 COPPUTERLANO 862 COPY LINE COPP. 63 CUCAKONGA CO WATER GIST as CUCAMONGA CD W760 GIST O . 67 CUCAMONGA PRINTING 259 0 C F CONCRETE CO 92 04ILV REPORT 716 Of AS60ND CONSTRUCTION 679 DICKIES STANDARD INDUSTRIAL 1106 02AINAGE CONSTAK7ION 765 DYNO -R00 ICU, IMC. 525 EAf TMAN, INC 459 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE 124 FENCE CAAF1 DF UPLAND. INC. 1912 FLIGHT ODYSSEY -DALE WONG 116 FONTANA PAVING INC. 1062 FNAARLIN INSTPUTE 1057 G T E L 1907 C M SURFACES 1907 SAM GAl6RAifR 1906 STAN GASDEN 157 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 7 - --- -RANCHO CUCAAUNGA� PA2E4 ] Tim, CfftP MA46••�NARR.AnT. C`GixER TIE Mf 26196 'M+'• -2 X065.00 6'9177 76199 70.00 1SLSEMENT °S 8700 90.00 S- 065- CARRIE/NtRISSIE 26201 10.00 6 9721"- f26202 20.00 IORSENENT 27201 160.00 6 9021 25204 20.00 3HIP-M NES$ LICENSE 6/69 26205 7,700.00 IAVISTA.-OTHER OTHENIE 26206 4..71 IA VISTAfOTNER PROJE Cif 26207 i.l 16. Pf 27206 56.62 42 25239 6.16 25210 9.76 L ALLU IHEON 26212 540.67 /6ICENTfNNIAI IUHLNET$ 25212 961.56 STAAF S /AA SRETH14 NETS 26214 62.32 Pluf 616 C OTNF9 STEWS 27215 17.50 26215 17.00 CHECA P COORDINATION 25216 912.20 NITERS 6 /il TO 7 /II 26216 466.62 Anon A J6 C OTHER ITEMS 25219 1,560.46 AN AYE P C OTHER ITEMS 75220 T.205.02 0,000 /6/C 700 25221 177.41 96 52601 C OTHER ITEMS 25222 I.2T1.21 AL C OTHER IIENf ^5721 2,141.51 PATE /PO C OTHER TICKS 15224 11.121.57 LS/ETC. L OTHER ITSNS 76226 664.55 ENT N0. 5 77226 52.940.90 NE lil N. GROVE 23221 64.50 L BINDER C DINER ITEMS 25226 816.8, DAY 25229 17.62 IALS 252)0 68.73 ONS TETUEREO.INSURANCE 25211 '2.160.00 MATE NO. C OTHER ITE45 26272_ 11.026.26 ISTCH JULY 68 25711 252.10 USINESS LICENSE 25225 109.00 R Tin MIS 10.00 JiINESf LICENSE 25217 1•.16 C OTHER ITEPS 26238 7.499.05 it e PANCNO CUCANCMGA' PACE? ' ITEM DISCO WARM - WAAR.AMT. OT JULY ENTERTAINMENT 25219 3h�j� wY�i S AND ORGANIZATIONAL NANCSOOK 5 -17 'f Y -85 LIST OF NARK ANTS 'y- l�•}�' s i 25241 250.00 jay PAYEE I ,rjrp Yyw ------- �. "- _------ •-------- "----- - - - - -• 662.10 1690 I RELSA GIBSON - 15.64 1906 GOVERNMENT CATA PUBLICATIONS 250.00 1697 RANDY HILL wt 136 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC. ` 156 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC. 91.91 1274 HOSEMAN y . y 1696 HOWARD NOTTING 41.00 IU S.P. MOTT IUP2ER CO. NOME CENTER 101.16 1647 KATHY HUGNLS 17 U 926 DENISE NUTT R; F, 496 912 NYORO.SCAPE PFDOUCTS INC INDOOR COMFORT CON1R&L, 2,240.90 994 INC. INLAND LITH0 ,y 1119 J.E.G. CONSIRUCTICH 90.00 612 C R JAESCHAE, INC 275.61 176/. KER9 EOUIPIIENT - 616 KUHN, MART 70.25 1997 CURT LANCE 649 LAWS ON PRODUCTS, INC. 95.45 1271 LE6I -TECH 1.000.00 1691 MRS. SMA90M LOGAN 2.498.00 1102 LORETTA LO1X0 15.00 4 LO ItN NARK 10.44 38 7A6 IL THE N iLtIAX )TON CO 105.03 76 PARRPAN C ARCZYNSKI 115.00 1699 MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORP. 54.45 460 KA BY IN C CHAPHAN CO - 1125 MC CARIC MACNINF 112.51 16ST PDOILF OIL CORPORATION 216.00 -594D 1277 MODERN IRRIGATION 253.30 1194 DAVE MOORE 146.00 642 POUNTAIN VIEW SPALL [NO. REPAIR 7.92 1147 CHEARICE FULIOPAV 6,247.16 40.00 1607 NATIONAL SAMIMARS, INC. 140.98 1694 LOTS NCI SF 21.56 911 ONTARIO INDUSTRIAL MED. CLINIC 1689 COUN11 OF ORANGE 1224 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SVC, INC. 275 ONE N ft ECTRIC 99T P . P PRINTING 224 PACIFIC PRODUCTS. INC. PANCNO CUCANCMGA' PACE? ' ITEM DISCO WARM - WAAR.AMT. OT JULY ENTERTAINMENT 25219 - 25D.00 S AND ORGANIZATIONAL NANCSOOK 25240 69.95 SSIT REFUND PENN 1142 25241 250.00 lFi P 11706,17717 C OTHER ITEMS 21242 1,497.41 LET t lases C OTHER ITEES 25241 662.10 18 " BEILCWSFLIK 21244 - 15.64 1SIT REFUND PERMIT • 7146 25246 250.00 MESS DRILL /DRIVER PAKITA 25246 1IN.47 IND CLASS 9744 25247 20.00 SON REIMBURSEMENT 25248 91.91 (BIRD PART DIAPHRAGM 25249 89.49 111ASELINE /CHECK UNIT 25250 41.00 OS FOR CALENDAR 25251 101.16 IRfSS PAYMENT N0, 7 25262 20,15$.29 UPPER RADIATOR C OTHER ITEMS 26257 {60.60 UD /IASOR C OTHER ITEMS 25254 2,240.90 ION REtMB'JRSFHINT 26255 48.14 ATIGMAL REIMBURSEMENT 25256 90.00 PE PAINT/ORANGE • CN YELLOW 25257 275.61 NO (DAVID) 25259 CLASS 1165 59 70.25 ION PEIl3URSFPENT SUPPLIES C HIM C OTHER ITEMS 75761 95.45 III REFUND PERMIT R 2114 25262 1.000.00 PANT: DAVIS C OTHER ITEMS 25261 2.498.00 PATPENT PERMIT TR 1756611 - 16 25264 15.00 IFICATIS OF APPOINTMENT 25265 10.44 IN WELD ON HONER C OTHER ITEMS 26266 105.03 NO PORTION /FILING FEES DR&T -(S 25267 115.00 :ATION SUPPLIES 25268 54.45 lURSE FOR VARIOUS SUPPLIES 26269 102.51 t ENGINE C OINIP ITEMS )TER INTERN ►A1t1 [NT 25270 112.51 :0 COMM W /POWER AND CONFIDENCE '7T 25271 25272 216.00 -594D REFUND PEMIT a 7176 25711 253.30 IYPENT PHYSICALS 25274 -- 146.00 :ASE 2 MPS ITED LINES 212[5 7.92 I /GONNA CT NOT WATER NEATER 75216 25277 6,247.16 40.00 IFIUTF S /ADUAT[CS 252Ta 140.98 TOR 2S2T9 21.56 e ITEM OESCR ` r AARRR WARR.AMT. £CURE OAS LINE /BUILOthG DEPT 26210 490.76 Y CORPORATE TARO 25211 106.91 RIFFS SPEEDOPETER REPAIR 25282 49.03 OLINE /FUEL OtL /DIESEL FUEL 25251 6,766.15 /MAT STAFBURST /CLOTH DUST 26284 i).86 CD JNTIAIST ACCT W -C OTHER ITEMS 25216 2,469.60 PEAT /1 NIGHT STAY/ C OTHER ITEMS 25216 160.40 PNIES FOR FOURTH OF JULY IS287 1,020.04 OUT ON JULY RENT /Ih CREASES 6.T 20288 641.00 UAL SUBSCRIPTION THROUGH 6/89 25189 48.00 CALAIS RESTROCMS, C OTHER ITEMS 25290 1,575.0.0 202 ARROW RTE F/D C DINER ITEMS 25291 5,013.00 OSIOE SPRAY PADGF,SM FOR WEEDS 25292 1,716.82 AL OF SCVfN INVOICES 28291 118.53 AFT R J6390569 25294 51 03 AL SASE GUTTER BID C OTHER ITEMS 25295 1,505.18 IL DRAG SHOES RUNN C OTHER ITM 26296 202.25 INANTT GRACE MORGAN 25297 121.70 MOSAIC LOGOS /IHSTALLAtION 26298 1,400.00 ELCASF /FREESTANDING PAPER HOLDER .5299 137.90 El RESERVATIONS 25300 100.00 DIET REFUND PERMIT 3113 25331 210.00 TIME PACKAGES 25!02 125.00 CHURCH /MAVEN C OTHER ITEPS 25303 644.73 BASELINE MARINE NE OTHER ITEMS 26304 607.32 6 MEADOW OTHER ITEMS 26305 664.21 t HELMS DINER ITEMS 28106 1,491.70 INALER PEDESTAL 18261 HAVEN. R.C. 26107 134.00 E 9153 9TH SIREOT 253D6 20.57 MONTH SERVICE CONTRACT 26109 984.35 UNIT RENT 25710 24.00 IMETIC REDUCER 25311 9.98 TEE AND SUPPLIES C OTHER ITEMS 25312 77.87 N CHECKS 26113 7,800:00 T ONTHS SLBSCRIPTIO C OTHER ITEPS 26314 234.00 I /MASK /ShORKEt 29315 34.34 ERAL GAS TAX 25716 8.11 AD APPLICATION FEE IRA 13098 25311 1.811.20 IO FLYER WAGON /PLAYGPOUND PROD. 29118 47.66 LACE CIGARITTE LID C OTHER ITEMS 25119 60.00 4ER CARRIER ASST 25120 1,340.69 r l: t a. i r, U i -„Y"', A +'gja 2 =13 -80 LIST OF NARRAMII'� :. y- t`}' PAYEE - yr, : ------------- .'1 SEE PICCHI PLUMBING CORPORATION 2t*•= 665 1909 PITASSI . DALHW POLITSCM SPEEDOFETER C TUNE -UP 236 FONA OISTRIBUTING CO ¢ 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 225 RANCHO COCA REDEYELOPPENT AGENCY �k+ 70 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER 607 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TROPHY C GIFT 10 A.M. BITTER DEV CO.' 1187 RISK PANAGEMENTFIOPMENT 1196 S C E SANDBLASTING 11e6 S C E 15 SAN BERN CO AGRICULTURAL COMM. 303 SAN BERN CO EPWA /LAND MANAGEMENT 214 SAN BERN CO SOLID HASTE PGKENT 132 SAM DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO, AhC 152 SAN DIEGO ROT ART BROOM 00 INC 1003 SAMOFF DEPOSITION SERVICI, INC. 1141 SCHARFF C SCHARFF - 1105 SEAL FURNITURE C SYSTEMS INC. 1911 SEATTLE SHERATCM MOTEL C TONERS 1695 DENNIS SEYMOUR 1189 IMF SOFTNAEF %OAKS 317 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 317 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. SIT SOUTNEEN CALIFUSNIA EDISON CO. - '117 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 316 SOUTHERN U.LIF9RMtA EDISON CO. 319 SOUTHERN CALIFORhIA GAS COMPANY 397 SOUIMEAN DATA SYSTEMS 322 SPARKLETTS 323 STANDARD BRANDS PAINT 766 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 378 SULLIVAN, R 279 THE SUN 1602 THE SWIM SHOP 614 TEXACO( INC 1615 TMOMPSUM BROT116AS CONSTRUCTION 1692 TOYS R US 471 TRICO 1163 J. 0 TLCKfF SDK, INC ITEM OESCR ` r AARRR WARR.AMT. £CURE OAS LINE /BUILOthG DEPT 26210 490.76 Y CORPORATE TARO 25211 106.91 RIFFS SPEEDOPETER REPAIR 25282 49.03 OLINE /FUEL OtL /DIESEL FUEL 25251 6,766.15 /MAT STAFBURST /CLOTH DUST 26284 i).86 CD JNTIAIST ACCT W -C OTHER ITEMS 25216 2,469.60 PEAT /1 NIGHT STAY/ C OTHER ITEMS 25216 160.40 PNIES FOR FOURTH OF JULY IS287 1,020.04 OUT ON JULY RENT /Ih CREASES 6.T 20288 641.00 UAL SUBSCRIPTION THROUGH 6/89 25189 48.00 CALAIS RESTROCMS, C OTHER ITEMS 25290 1,575.0.0 202 ARROW RTE F/D C DINER ITEMS 25291 5,013.00 OSIOE SPRAY PADGF,SM FOR WEEDS 25292 1,716.82 AL OF SCVfN INVOICES 28291 118.53 AFT R J6390569 25294 51 03 AL SASE GUTTER BID C OTHER ITEMS 25295 1,505.18 IL DRAG SHOES RUNN C OTHER ITM 26296 202.25 INANTT GRACE MORGAN 25297 121.70 MOSAIC LOGOS /IHSTALLAtION 26298 1,400.00 ELCASF /FREESTANDING PAPER HOLDER .5299 137.90 El RESERVATIONS 25300 100.00 DIET REFUND PERMIT 3113 25331 210.00 TIME PACKAGES 25!02 125.00 CHURCH /MAVEN C OTHER ITEPS 25303 644.73 BASELINE MARINE NE OTHER ITEMS 26304 607.32 6 MEADOW OTHER ITEMS 26305 664.21 t HELMS DINER ITEMS 28106 1,491.70 INALER PEDESTAL 18261 HAVEN. R.C. 26107 134.00 E 9153 9TH SIREOT 253D6 20.57 MONTH SERVICE CONTRACT 26109 984.35 UNIT RENT 25710 24.00 IMETIC REDUCER 25311 9.98 TEE AND SUPPLIES C OTHER ITEMS 25312 77.87 N CHECKS 26113 7,800:00 T ONTHS SLBSCRIPTIO C OTHER ITEPS 26314 234.00 I /MASK /ShORKEt 29315 34.34 ERAL GAS TAX 25716 8.11 AD APPLICATION FEE IRA 13098 25311 1.811.20 IO FLYER WAGON /PLAYGPOUND PROD. 29118 47.66 LACE CIGARITTE LID C OTHER ITEMS 25119 60.00 4ER CARRIER ASST 25120 1,340.69 r l: t a. i r, U i 4 -11 -88 UST OF WARRANT& PAYEE ITEM CESCR ' 912 U S SPRINT 112999214 2$321 489 CITY OF UPLAND WATE"REFUSE 25222 1182 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY COMPANY FOUR OAS GET. 25522 158 NFLOINO INCUSTRIAL C TOOL SU ►PL HILIUMISALLOON C OTHER ITEMS 25324 - $09 XEROX CORPURAIIOM REGULAR SEPVICE CHARD C OTHER ITEMS 25325 TOIAL,CNECRS �s..+...� ��......- �....- .... -. .._ _ x • iACE s ; A4PR AMT. 11.21 122.79 S.STG.80 15.50 428.9• ►4p,621.18 1 o -- {'t'.?q �.sl Z3i5 is =•u 'fiC -Jt. F:' __ .. fit. �.2..._w• ,_"s: 1- 6 -88 LIST OF WARRANTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 1 8 PAYEE _ITEM OESLR WA6RR WAR.ART. 's 1650 Wl HEST DRYWALL INC �- CNIWR OVERLAP VOID [NECK Oi 6/29 24707. -63.02 1i *• 1601 KAREN PFARGf VOID CHECK OF 6/29 24701 - 24572 21577. -6.00 Z -, 1015 226 R M R S RANCHO COCA RCOEVELOPPEPT 21634 POSTAGE FOR NITER - 24916 24916. 7.000.30 "- AGENCY REPAY LOAN t0 ADA 21917. 321.442.22 Yt` 10 A C R TINE SERVICE FLAT REPAIR 24916 it - 266D2 2!007 z: 1627 211 A G S AUDIO GRAPHIC SYSTEMS ► REDAPNCNE 26601 4.06 764.05 +.= A I AL fT STE PS BURGLAR ALARM SEA'ICE C OTH ITEMS ER 29001 957.00 1665 A.P.E. LOCK GW C KEY IRIP CHARGE AND SAFE OPENING 25006 165.00 Ye 1175 ACTION PRINT AND OFFICT SUPPLIES CFTC SUPPLIES C OTHER ITEMS 26001 382.90 ' 1095 STEVEN ALLEN CONTRACT SERYTCES 25008 449.04 .V 1664 DOROTHY AITONUCCI OL'i NPAYMENT CLASS 6 7700 25009 7.00 819 1665 ART ARAGCN ARIZONA PIPELINE SOFTBAII STAFF 25010 77.50 ' 29 B C K ELECTRIC DEPOSIT REFUND PSRMST R 2110 25011 1.000.00 1623 B AND 0 SHEET METAL INC. FLOUR LAMP BUTTRESS tICENSF REFUND 25012 25017 157.07 31.50 � 1670 DENISE RAGE CLASS REFUND CLASS ■ 7490 25011 15.00 1675 141 BARBARA AMERD BA.NT OF ARIpIW REFUND LEAF] R 7090 25015 19.00 1161 DIVILOPPENT CO. BASELY MATURITIES tORU AND EXPENSES PONIIPERTATIOM ST 25016 26017 21.26 - 33 E BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE ALU ME PALE qTT /NITBITOpVR/ C DINER ItERf OTHER 25018 1,150.00 60.31 ,. 1672 1029 CARRY BEACH BERRY CONSTRUCTION, ON. INC. JAll OG PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 8 26019 2!020 70.00 1052 AN M 5ETER PILEAOC RFIMBUPSIMENT 71021 239.914.61 21.22 1622 1613 ARLO BLAIR CAROL 01416 REFUND POWUPENTAT ION DEPOSIT 7102 REFUND CUSS • 29022 1.400.00 1662 BRONCO 600AS70PE 9122 C OTHER ITEMS ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHIC STANDARDS BK 25027 25021 10.03 1621 1517 BROIL C KUER C M T t PRECISION INTEGRAIING SLP 21075 -I6DJ4 4.495.65 1618 CAL NEST INC. LUNCNIDN FOR CMTA -LIZ C OTHER ITEMS OVERPAYMENT BUSINESS 26026 70.00 119 SCALE CALIFORNIA a SUTE Lt CENSE ACCT • 912 -0017 -7 29027 25026 47.67 1619 CANDY CURTIS EXEC FILM PREVIEW 25029 970.00 0.60 1663 1670 CANOE CANEYEEl 4lTNE WHET REfUAJ CLASS R 1221 25070 33.OD 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE DEPOSIT REFUND PEAMI7 4 3035 S1CP /AHERO 16EGIN /ENO1 C OTHER ITEMS 25031 2f 012 790.00 113 CNtCK'S SPORTING GOODS the T- SHIRTS 2507) 2.188 90 74 85 CITY RENTALS COVINGTO4 C CROWE TRACTOR DARDEN C OTHER ITEPS 2!074 71.27 675.20 LEGAL Si RVICES RINDEREO THRU 6/31 23075 165.00 i I a 0 -00 lift OF WARRANTS PACE 2 WAPR9 -.- PAYEE ... »..».» _ } ._.» ----------- it if L C OTHER ITEMS 05 CUCAMONOA CO WATER DIST HER NGSA PA RA LA GLORIA C J 4+ B5 CUCA/ONGA CO WATER DIST ` 410 WINDOW EN iM. S7 CUCAMONGA PRINTING 941 A7 SUPPLY SLOPE GPITACi CEMEA LEEOP AND T11 q ]Be CAMELS TIF1F F SERVICE CANT 1 1647 PAULA DENSER MILEAGE NEW MILEAGE REIN i� 1162 JAMES DENSON 1101 DEPENDABLE AUTO SERVICE DID /IU4E /Flll SOFTBA CITIZI 61.20 101 N SOFTBALL S1A1 j" ERIC 077 ERIC DICK 5"' C' �,. 051 EAD OEPOSII I'll" }• CAVE DOOUGHUGH 160! CAVE OVEgpAYnENI 712.7E 1611 DRIVE No SHOP CLASS CAMC61 2. 1675 CINDY DUFFY pEFUMO CLASS It 1999 1642 ROOFME OU110N POCKET PAS% _ 1616 DYNA AID S P 1 SYSTEMS, INC. 69 MDJpi C A _ 917 E 523 EASTMAK. INC SOLARI WAL I PAGfMAKCP /CI 25050 459 EOGMEAD SOFTWARE OVEMPATMINT NAY VALVE 1617 ELOQUENT EXPRESSIONS CANON Ie66 EMPIRE CAM12A 777 Slll ESPINOZA LIFE SERVICE OLAIER N 321 CLASS CANGII 1641 ISPI EVANS CABBAGE !AP 1621 MICHAEL FARMED too1 FIREmASTER - F.M. CHEMICAL CO. �SfDC1ATF$Si 412 FIRST EPPIRE FUND ING DEPOSIT REF 1612 RONNIE FLOPES FONTANA PAVING INC. PRO EST ND. iRAVF !I6 476 JERRY 6• FULWO60 CC%SULTPC CIVIL ENGINEERS REINB INGINEIRING 1116 0 P S 1764 TEL PNE SOFiDALL S1 10NIEGAPCIA 137 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. AS SO 714 - 167 -470 ACCOUNTING 97 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS 1119 GPEEKWQOD•S UNIFORPS NOVI LUABIR CO. HOME CENTER 4l1TERY CAI " 161 S.N 656 "lie CONSTFUC710N SPECIALTIES 2E CAL SAW 1647 KATHY HUGH Ef REFUND CLAN 1671 SHERRI HYATT ANNUAL CON' vii INOOOaACOPFORI CONTROL, INC. 4!]I 9TH S I a C OTHER slim$ D EVENT iNC L COOK S C L C8P311, N I vElbliT a 7111 E %P CIIAMB OF COPm nTG iHVICES FOR NAT 46 RENTAL IHRCUGNb'24N6 F C OTNiP ITEMS D3T IN6 C FINANCIAL REP BULBS LOGE CAN /$ GA C DINER ITEMS a 1109 0 7201 ENCE/DCT 27-27 66 IT /REPLA C OINER ITf MS 32w6 20.00 22.50 461.00 126.:6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PACE 2 WAPR9 WARN.AMI. L pTNFp ITEMS 24076 !,111.36 it if L C OTHER ITEMS 26077 45. 16 246.3% IOPCS tW1ITE1 NfAIME C OTHER STEMS 21076 24079 22.16 SERVIC C OTHER ITEMS 36040 9D 3.0 122 25041 .0O SENfNI pEil 80011 LUC 26042 61.20 31047 29.66 PATROL C OTHER ItFIS 045 712.7E C OTHER ITEMS 26646 144.75 pf 6H11 It 1999 2SO41 25046 250.0E 16.01 IMffS .&CENSE 25049 70.0E 710L 25050 16.0E 1H ONE NAY VALVE 25061 122.0! i C OTHER slim$ D EVENT iNC L COOK S C L C8P311, N I vElbliT a 7111 E %P CIIAMB OF COPm nTG iHVICES FOR NAT 46 RENTAL IHRCUGNb'24N6 F C OTNiP ITEMS D3T IN6 C FINANCIAL REP BULBS LOGE CAN /$ GA C DINER ITEMS a 1109 0 7201 ENCE/DCT 27-27 66 IT /REPLA C OINER ITf MS 32w6 20.00 22.50 461.00 126.:6 t, • 7- 6.66 LIST OF WARRANTS - RANCHO CUCAMONGA PACE 3 PAYEE IYEP DESCR WAR" HARR.AN1. 612 C R JAESCMAE 'INC Wilt HOTOR/MOB DAUM OTHER ITEMS 26077 - 7,092,07 1655 GAVE D JOHUSTEH RIF190 CLASS N 7109 27Dte 22.50 . 1624 STEVE JONES SOFTBALL STAFF 20079 60.OD 1611 R C R ED" AND SUPPLY, IM.:. _ CAN OPENING TOOL - 21080 9v.7e 1651 B1p8ApA REIL REFUND CLASS P 9071 250111 20.00 1366 KERN IDUIP6INI STARTER /LABOR C OTHER ITEPS 25082 41923.22 1662 HARIN,1040 OVERPAY9ENS 9 1122 26003 3.00 193 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION ^.0 PAGG ESt NO. 5 21024 2,677.29 1610 LIGHTNER OEVELOPPENT DEPOSIT REFUND PERPIT 1 1037 26095 000.00 511 LINVILLE CIVIL INOZNEERS 9TH STREET IMPROWNEN C OTHER ITEMS 25066 2,122.00 10411 DIANA IORf LI REFUND CLASS 5 6100 260:7 7. 50 1609 LUWIES GEOLOGIC SERVICES REVIEW Of RASMUSSEN %EIGHT 3 -31 -48 25066 560.00 1160 M C J MATERIALS INSTALL DfCONATIVE 8OULDERSIPLAGUE 25099 1,70440 1567 M S A INLAND EMPINE /DESERT CHPTR ANNUAL OUES/BLEVINS /SETTER/BARN /Pal 20090 30.00 160A MARINE FESCUE PRODUCTS tNC. CAN WILLIE C STRAP 25091 154.60 72 PARR CHNISTOF14E0. CNIVROLET SCOPE CHECK EMISSIONS /FUEL FILTER 25092 156.93 450 MARSHALL C MCAMIGIIT TOW3NG,INC. TOW TO CITY YARD C OTHER STIRS 26093 125.01 1629 CERRA MATNISEN REFUND CLASS a 7066 26074 15.00 1624 NANCY YATHISEN REFU4 $012 C CTMEN ITEMS 25090 51.00 1626 STAN M:OSHI WINDROWS REC CLASSES 25096 66.00 1125 MC GAREC MACHINE FABRICATE 4 MOORS C W C OTHER ITEMS 25097 344.40 009 JASON 41YEA CABBAGE PATCH EVENT C OTHER ITEMS 25090 126.70 1651 LUCY PETER REFUND CLASS M 7202 25099 22.50 6C2 PAT MEYER SOFTBALL STAFF 25100 142.00 $51 B42 MEYER CHUCK CONTRACT HELP /CABBAGE PATCH EVENT 25111 20.10 POUNTIIH VIEW $PALL ENO. REPAIR GUARDS /TINE /SLAOES /PL C OTHER ITEMS 25102 420.07 115) CMEARICE MULEGRAV PAYMENT FOR COMPUTER INTERN 25103 370.00 230 W 6 I'S THE OFFICE PLACE SHTFOR C OTHER ITEMS 25105 11144.00 1162 N B S / LG.19 AGREEMENT DATED DEC 2, 1987 29105 174.16 160? NATIONAL S(MINAAS, INC. LEADERSHIP C SUPERVISORY 3R?LL 25106 39.00 231 MEN" INC. 9373 NINTH STREET C OTHER ITEMS 2610? _ 4,490.50 1643 PETEA NICHOLS REFUND OVERPAYMENT 25103 7.50 AT ON-CALL PAGING JUNE SERVICE 25109 OTL.00 1652 HELEN 07TEMS SPRING CPR At NEPAL REFUND 25110 6.00 235 OWEN ELECTRIC INSTALL THREE CIRCUITS 9330 BASELIN 25111 478.00 791 P.M.I. DENTAL HEALTH PLAN OENTAL -JULY GROUP N 1236 25112 431.20 229 PACIF!C PRODUCTS, INC. EFA OIAPH ASY /INIVt RSAL ALEEO PLUG 25113 49.64 1134 HENRY PADILLA SOFTBALL STAFF 25115 45.00 1605 RA FEN PEARCE OVERPAYMENT CLASS 3 7100 25115 3.00 797 PEP BOYS NIPPON GLAZEIRAO HOSE 20116 24.96 1604 PEPPERMINT CLEANERS 041PATMENT BUSINESS LICENSE 2211? 9.00 t qyr :4 z r Y l2. . - _•_ -' - _ :'GT. i- TM.d "'[t:?�.;- fir,. ,. _ _ i- 6 -60 LIST OF'WtARANTS -� �,%f' • RANCHO CUCAMONGA PACE 4 v ►ATFF ITEM OESCR WAARN• NARR.AXI. (i Ad06 265 TETRA OFOICCHNICAL INC. IORA DiSTRiBUTlNO CO - OVERPAYMENT BUSIMESS LICENSE 29116 - - 4 1656 PAT IDRIOA GASOLINE, FUEL Olt _ 25119 18.40 7,016.93 7" 1639 KATHY PFOCTOA REFUND CUSS 9 7001 CLASS CANCELLED 25120 15.00 65 966 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY PURRISS.001E ASSOCIATES PO► /NAT /CLSTN OUST C 9TNER ITEMS x5121 25122 15,00'. 113'66 251 R C R AUT0F01tVE CONSULTATION WITH CITY TY STAFF POST -25123 21639.96 -1" 65 R M A ACCIDENT SAFETY C OTHER IiENS LANDSCAPS A%CNITEC7UAAL SERVICES 25124 2.) }7,19 1 80 RAINBOW PHOTO LAO ROIL OF 24 25125 112.00 - 676 1110 RAUL•I TIRE SERVICE MARK FA 220 71 AE AFFAIR NEW TUIF C FJTIIER lTk Nf 29176 1 ►127 S.ST ' 661 RECREATION iTfTE NS INC SYSTEISI IN SOFTBALL STAFF 2012, 157, 1A 105.00 160) RECREATION e I$ HIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 25129 600.00 ,. 1165 RICHARDSON AUTO BOOV, INC.• POOL CAPACITY SIGN BODY WORK 84 FORD LID 25130 9.55 112 270 RITZ CANER. CENTECS RI VE Rf TOE BLUEPRINT PHOTOFINISHING IMO C OTHER ITFn$ 23131 - 24132 164.12 69 J6 320 S C l M COMPANY BL U(IINE PRINTS /STMT C DINER STEPS C -4 ZS U] •57.21 320 S C L M COMPANY XM kAV FN C ISTM C MEE ITEMS 23134 26,361./6 301 SAN $IBM CO SHERIFFS MAINTENANCE OISTAICT C DINER ITEMS PXE TBlSE 25115 5,9x9.81 I)2 1619 SAk DIEGO ROTApY ARGON CO, IN JO NA SAN TOf III OUITER 0p C DINER tTErIS 2f 1)6 25137 457 ,434.OD 376.2{ 3644 BAR3ARA SCHIEVING SOFTBALL iBAII STAFA AI ':D Guff R 92 )e 26116 107 d5 16]4 1656 KATHY SCOTT PAULA SMILLIE REFUND C1 AS A 9349 ` {l3• 25140 70.00 40.00 1646 "FGAAFT SMITH OVEAPATKENT a 7122 REFUND CLASS a 810] 25141 6.00 3650 763 PAROARET SPITS KATHY SOREN1fN POIIPT C FF CLASS REFUND 25142 25143 7.60 70.60 - SIT $GUINEAN CALIFORNIA EOISOD CO. 34 RGROV IRSEXEHT 75144 39.60 317 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CU. AFFO b130 JASPER SGL OIN2R ITEMS 25145 311 317 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 74 CApN EL SAN /ANAL ON S 1,123.65 ]39 SGUtMEPM UlIFOiNTA EDISON CO. C OTHER STEMS 10437 )9TM SIR SPC C 25147 •1.124.06 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COPPANy OTHER ITEMS 111 N GROVE AV 25.0 .. $6.82 646 764 STANDARD INSURANCE CO. C OTHER lIE PS JULY LIFE INS. 6497]90 25149•_. 129.15 1602 SUMMIT GRADIN3 C PA%-W THE $win -01 ST PRQG EST 17. 9 29150 160.40 i40 $NOP DELLASTR MANUFACTURING GQnPAM[ FINS, 12 SNORKEL 25154 25152, 41,669.87 33.86 1600 PRESSURE tUAGE /SOCREiM0221! /PNilll 1605 TREND SEi TER: TREND SETTER; CLASS CANCELLED 25154 41.63 71S TUOMF Rf INC OVERPAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE 23155 11.00 1600 URSSA •IB SERVILE UNIT 6645 C PS 25156 24.75 66T PISA LOkFFREHCE REGIST. as -89 BUDGETTE 97 ACCT • SAID 0056 6132 3004 25156 496.00 312.91 t qyr :4 z r Y l2. . i K 1- 6 -66 LIST OF WARRANTS RANCHO CUCAISONBA PAGE 6 ^" PATEE IIEN DEfCR %AAR$ WARR..UIT. 1661 IN VO OVERPA7M[NT R T122 ?iSi9 6.00 467 L.A. WAINSCOTT ASSOC, INC. PROGRISS 81LLSNGIARROW AT WIDENING ]6160 7,512.90 �df 1676 M. OR ART. WALKER REFUND CIASS M 7165 25161 20.24 1655 CHERYL NAND RFFUO CLASS • 7171 24162 2.26 978 CARL WARREN t CO CLAIMANTS ROBERT BAD C 2TMER 1.[ $$ 75161 1,167.11 215 HERMAN NLEFN -LIME CORP 65 SIOWTUPI IDVELS C OA.C* ITEMS 2F164 _ 213.14 1604 MF RXAX WF ISfBfR INC DEPOSIT NIFWD Pf RHIT A 2SD0 25166 $00.00 156 HELOING INOUIIAIAL C 100t SUPPL HELIUM 261" 11.92 218 WCSTSAN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, IX' SPECIAL POLTPLATI SIGNS 26161 S, Ul.aB 1619 PARGEE WIERENG6 REFUND CLASS R 7166 20167 70.25 1655 MARGARET WILLETT Nf ?VND CUSP • 90W 2{169 20.00 1671 me. OR MRS. MI1fOtl REFUNU CUSS M 7165 26170 20.25 00- XEROX LCAPORATION 2.4 MRS REG SERVICE C OTHER ITEMS 20171 2,565.99 TOTAL CHECK; 1257,120.20 i K AOfa1TA7NN1 NMI ALOONMA: Mpalb Lmw ma7 1. iTN01 p Wida({) — u •_••^ ,7r 0.p, v N AbAsh, ' I" awyY Cr.l a�YrrY. Ul. ry/10 � AMA {r7 t1{ Wj � HER W W7FICN A��7/YAa4: rfN O I�r 1..1. Arrr. .^ 1 MAMtmI p AN9KM/flq 11M, Em Oaq a .Tlaq MYl 1 tim(g 01 nwaaawrhl m uG nra ♦ 111 w.Nri ¢.r l 21W. Cry A _ TOTAA IL ANf.r. — NI 1M •R.—Ar —.V"" Y Y ll M pw.r. Yi Mw r M "AR -I.+ —.i. .w «a M1l 1L.. M N .f.l.r rrrl � Y. MNw1 N M rw4r N lY AbAN. Yww. CwN ke 11 7TATI d CAUFp .Y�w ~.' ......w...a. �. w Y. Y T. Yy.............1 r Y Ir .wY.1 . M Y .wr•\ w r .�... 4..a'..r..a4.. +ra.r .....Y r...wa.. -..+.w �.�r...+.�Y.w n.+.....+... w. w...... ...� w...\..� u r r.r..r.... r.r� w r r..w... a r... ... � r...\4.. a...... la ANU ANT soN Nme A"LWATIGN BY TRANSMo! IS aTAtt d UIM(PNN.A C-Vy b4 Y V Y.M Y w+.`Y ..w.i T Y `w.Y ....... ...��. ....w Y.. �Y Y.✓. .. 4.�. I . � w Y 4W ' U. Na Wr4e DN.r Tab u"'FrD".0 Umo* �� 0 rkfi r" rao.a 0 ...... _corm MAM + lv.. ❑Mrw6IwN wr _O4. r. �N4,�_____ r...wu •r. rl��■ err _ -. _ r..N+ ~- YIYrrLw AYlr_r ...na1[JIAA /OR AiCO1101R Mrnlw 1dvltKi OP/.Fa r Ak.%k s.. , CrW Sw G -fmli SiM 39WASOM mm S US TDZ�: Of w ZO Cad. [..•F[ V. NO w1. More TY. U-1 Fr w Ur Oat[ AMdN, ❑ [..a.d.d+ak.. C [d..1.T I.OrI C.— _cowA w... C W ..,A F. N_�.J.yd.. �. CM.. • a, L mwm a A"W—w A S. AWSW d >, i Tmm a mea4cr4IpI 111 UC IT[[ !YV i A i _� Amual K i, Gh U J1A:1 IU[in[ .� a Uudr r iw»._aw.k. w IL.r MS ftz r tW. /B � w = i ICL IN 11)]0 tpTµ Ii Agl.r .m... T.) A...� r•yr r71.F.d M .•.r. iePrd ar..w A i... M W a..T4wr .1 • C...t W _AIFi.4ArMAw u.Yr r...IFw M.I.I..Fd NMrwil+w NM AIrMi. I....Ln. C..N A.l II STATI a CNUObG Cry •Y= �•� ..r Y IT. - � M r ••.�Y r..w..wr • YM...F� b Ir � Y 4. Y.. r+r ..rF r 4 ..,F r r . r •.Y Y rw..L Y .• Y+ Y •Mr . rM� r n�rr .iI ww. w Y Yom. r � .. YM,. ;..• Y uY• .. _•I .Y w Y...nW.YYr.V Yr•b .r..rr•F•t� .r.... •.r.a.M...+...r •.Lr I..M..• Y+P • .•.� �.. •Y . u. �.. tP .•.Y �. •.. M ...Y... l..•. Y ....•. r •. Yr..Y i• .....1 Mi• AYY• ld AIN War LNA3J.. N^eT 5. �.�— .—.• A//UCAMN RT TUNSMOR M STATI a GWOIMA ri. ti. / r +r .yw.. w. r Nr .J T ... 1• w Y L, ... ..•W..Y. .. Y ..rr L.Y. .•.�. • Y .nT1 Y.M. �. Y Wr r r. L. r/r YYwr w Iw Wi YI •. = Lr.� • r +y .P �.., w r w•L ✓u W M • �•^ V..yyLT r1J: •. Y rw r ....T. .T . r r...- • ^ ` as, L Y ...rr ..,r•. v r M Y fir... r. w • LY .•�. � •rr Mn ti• Y M...r r +.n �F.` y r..+ P••r• r • µ.Y • y w w ...w.y . r L.•...r.... r.r / iI-•. Yw. +.~r M .Y. �.r•Y .r r+.r•4•r.•rFYY.r Y IA N...IFI N IY.,n.r.t 17 i1..P o N II.L ) IA tL -" LF F _ N. 1rae.,r t1u.M. W SMI Of w ZO Cad. [..•F[ V. NO w1. More TY. U-1 Fr w Ur Oat[ AMdN, ❑ [..a.d.d+ak.. C [d..1.T I.OrI C.— _cowA w... C W ..,A F. N_�.J.yd.. �. CM.. • a, COPY- _� W. ...•Y Tr APPLICATION SOR ALCOHOLIC 92WMAGI IIVIOIN �Sw O.•nr.. I Akh.Ak h.. W C." ?, 19011naltiT lte.rrw C.N. MIS IAA APirtllm 1. TOM) OF UCDGE) FU N0. wr 4Y SSSA A HIM AHAW t Al SK 2i Q fStOn O.A. ItiwAe. Rfi1R iq. E: Orr /wiNlw T/M� 1.r r i KUWM Or AMICOITM rT pr.11 to . Dw. 1 ITT" OF TLVaACTKM S) m lrA! S .JD IO It i' Nr N S.Wu -= -L =-Z= WS.. WJI AwtMlt CU1N1 Dr., ltl. it Oy.J Lpc d. =1 11iTAl I &90 U.." 3b 1 .I ]•.]111w T' P hDW/ Ww r•• L A%X, Ad*. 01 AN A•e S)-SI..Sir inA Se.w nr.rY.. ,. rw.t T•t t +Nw t...wr Y • TMrTl . Jn .a I� f +d�tib r riR.pld�ss'M IM D�rrl�jw- IL IO t'TR- ie.wir MMt M.Wwr..inrr.NO....JM.w.it pen a w. ipu•iw 11 -N -Yft DIb.. 11 STAR d CAWpfM Cw.ry M �610.i tNS61nn 0.r ''^ " ''T'tlB 34. AMCAW .� i ti .�.w� ...�+W�.�. w r...._rr• -.. ~•..�i . �.rr` r. h.....: w r. m .�. Nom..• . ✓�+. v.. M W� rr. r ��... h...� .w.w... �e.wt r. r L...w 4 .V Y ./� /�� (,,�JFr Slott nen r6 to I Ku. w A"LxARON RY T"xsnROR IS. STAR OF CAUO1 A C.", N- _SU�.t 4r �. • wh.. T.r �. 4. .�. w. ww n� N • Y� . ..�. M. I r Mw M� � .w .wns Yl.. w.NrM� WYiN rwN i_r..w /rl.. w.wrwM w.r ./.Y.w N. I.Fr ....^'i �..�� /wl.. ...V." Vow M1.r•�.. r.lw..Y~i�.Y Y.Y .F�.�t 1b.+w�F.�.. r.�.rrrN..rN NU„rr..� I)-No Writ• M. TAU LSvI Fn Mpi.I.r.t UN� '� ArdM, 13 I.Ol ASU,. Q Al- wypeT•A 0. ■ OrIrL M Ako k lk Gfkd 1101 n••i..7 >o�fa �.171)t if• M[•uAlr-0 W'• OAIi City f bJYt JUN 27 10 T` aaa1 Y•PIMIa /Nwu I L IIAM M Of Mf11CA11 M L TVM%d TIMAAC110W71 li ararN MAaY 1 la•f•• M hrn.N1 rT C 7Y73U dii0 at. y Mwucwnu CueWny fb•. TrM N Ik.M. ❑ I SIM IrrY I. 11rw 7r• •.1r ba• 1w.kM N • rrkw/7 t6 1'•r• N 7'•uC MMM •q N 11• In.kia "AkO k w r.�.lr•M � b r r�V Wa N Y t4yrrw r. 11. lnMw • •Tll• •uw a •r.0 • r 10 � ti wralwM.f.A rM W ••r.N M J Yir •gio••r IL AgAksY pra) tal Yia M.•w•i1r aylglt N r+air 4r•n1 M�a+.li l•.• N M rwiAnFw N • 4r.w, N al iV M i r .i.l•w r raH r w +a V .Ir1.nd N M •Arles M fa AkMrk Ir•.r•1 CruM M 11 STA71 Of CA OIMA [rnl7 M ifn N11.1di 0 � Wry ... nr ..r •..•'. Y'.• r`w..r .�i.•yl r w r ...�.... M r ..v.r . .r.. w.Yw i.r. •rwrr r.4.i.. y . 4r ..Y� r �.r4 W M M �. w M v., r..r.r`rr .r .y w.rr......r .... +. .. ..r. .n I.. ...Mrw.. .........� e. .. /� ...� ..r 1•.... wr... ..�.. Y rHiV .w M dr. M ..n. V rM. w rr� H . .r..rr.r..r.r.�r.wrr�..y.Yw.•.. rr.1.r.. Y•r..w.. H.wrtir. •. •+w .rF .rr.rr..r+r.r rr-.. w.r .� r.- .+.ran.. r...A......�..r....w r...r..... MI. T w w•r. ..r... W .. r Y4 wM.... rr Y .W.r Y .r. r ..w.. r yu..r ......r .ti... M If. Af1{ICA11T 713N Mi[ APPLICATION 7Y TR/111fRRM IL 3TAT1 a CAOIOU Cw.y .r.__Afn.�s!rrulYlm OrY . /tl /Af rw r r +....+. r+... r... -r ... iu r . rW Y rr. �r�....r u... .• .M1 ..r .+..nr /•.r. r ^ W . w..rn.....r. w �..H�_A.rr.. ...•.r... V.r •.. .. w.rr 4r. w r r.r.... r w r.r ^•..r rvua lw u.rl7r Orprl.nl Oa Odi I ,/ AYaM6 Ll laadN aq•, (I/ ❑ IWWb •rr..k ❑ir'u`N 11•N•..__._Ji1 r.�_ -.__._ ORUa_.•�.._�I rtWr W.._.�._..__• Y: a s a m w E D5 is STeEF'f QUALITY MARYET 10120 25th Street Rancho Cucamnga, California Property Presently Zoned: Low Residential (CoSeflc a1 Spoo ex s ng non- n t ooning Lonmerlcial) Zoning of Adjacent Property: North: Medium Residential South: Low Residential East : Low Residential West : Low Residential /J School existing APN/ 209 - 101 -29 -1 -000 by; Torrez, J. 11 JULY 1988 a r5 .a , DATE July 20, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT M Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM Jerry B. Futwood, Director of Resource Services BY: Thomas Smihula• Data Pmoesstg Coordinator n.u. i, ,: ..,: ,u,.: , us .:,:, .1i Staff recommends City couw, rs approval to execute contracts for computer hardware/software maintenance wLh Wasiak Computer Services, Computeftand of Redlands, CalComp. Tektronix and Pdmo Computer In the total amount of $57,738. The computer equipment located throughout the City requkas periodic maintenance and repair. The following vendors provide these services on some of the hardwarelsoftware located throughout the various departments. These pluces of equipmont/sottware we essential for the support of Geographical Information Systems, Management Information Systems, and Mapping functions within the City. SUMMARY! Following Is a breakdown of these services: Westek Computer Sorvices- Personal Computers d Printers Cacomp•Plottors and Dlgitlzers Tektronix - Graphic Terminals Pflme•Mlnl Computer Computodand -Apple Products $25,572 3.072 1,212 22,548 5.334 R pectiu"y suDmiued, /f // ♦� � �/jJ w 7Zy Jerry B. Fulwood Director of Resource Services JBF:TS:sgr Attachments w r r. �g .r 0 ISM So. Sunklat at. Side APB. AnYwlm CA 02WO (7t')634-1573 01173 MIUovA 6WIe 211. FakndA CA 966 DW)42MIla BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT EguitlnEnt Locettan Add" City of Rancho Cucamonga 9330 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -- nLI(714)989- 1851tptTAtn Tom Smihula B,Iluy Addrtw AYeement No. IBM022 Eltem,n Date 7-1-88 Eewre Date 7 -1 -89 INIIN AEreamnt Addem'.m .❑ PACE 1 of 5 P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Finance Dept TEU COe1TACT, Wntek Computer Beak*, fnr: pees to Praeldo and the Cuttornar prey to EeLapt the 'W1112111011 AMtla on dM egWpment lined W low, at iM M"dy 6WW IndWted. The Ym0 and CONklorN of dM Book 141 AEreeltwnt Y Of forth Cn the face and revere side tMraof an the term and awW[tWd ltxdkMW#. ITEM YODILUM 0EICROTpr/7EEINALom OTy. UN CHG. Yo.CW'L 1 5170 IBM AT w/ Communications Fort, Single 7 $24.00 $168.00 2 Floppy, 20meg Hard Drive and Keyboard 2 5170 IBM AT w/ Communications Port, Dual 2 $19.00 $38.00 Floppy, and Keyboard 3 IBM AT Compatible w/ 360K Ploppy, 20meg 2 $24.00 $48.00 (lard Drive and Keyboard 4 IBM PC XT /286, 522K RAM, 20meg Dist. Drive, Dual 360K Floppy Drive, 1 $26.00 $26.00 Controllers, Power Supply, Keyboard SIN - 51721069648 5 6 ° SIN - 51721069663 ' 1 $26.00 $26.00 " SIN - 51721069901 1 $26.00 $26,00 8 ` SIN - 51721069917 1 $26.00 ..$26.00 ' SIN - 51621069633 1 $26.00 $26.00 PREVENTIVE MAWTE7tMCE EVERY -90 OAYa AYMENT•CHECK BILLING INTERVAL ELECTED. o1MAtERLY PAYMENTS (a) X %X %XXXX NUI- ANN EXECUTION OF THIS AGREEMENT IS UPCN RECEIPT OF INITIAL PAYMENT X %XXXXXX ANNUAL ►Arta[NTE (f) ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER CWIANI NAME ` AU1 IZEDLOWT E Aera lte NTAT,Vt (INW IrNll TITLt ,RAT( ACCEPTED BY WEETEK WanEk COmpner Senitat. Ine AUTNOR,Z[p EIONATURE 1 th,�hMd AT,VE Dennis Raney T,TLt President CATI .— fi- Y• US! Bsnees euei m 015M So. Sunkist St. Suite AB, Anshdm CA 93✓f00 (714) &4-1573 0 1125 ktkwurt Suite 211, Film" CA siSM (MT) aie.ptea BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Equipment Location Address City of Rancho Cucamonga 9330 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Ttu(714)989 -1 E51roNTACT, Tom Smihula Billirp Address Agreement No I13MO22 , Effectlw Data 7 -1 -88 Expire Date 7-1-89 r Initial Agreement Addendum PAGE 2 of 5 P.O. Box 807 _ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Finance Dept, TEU CONTACT, WMtek Compute Semka, Ire WN$ to pmid# and the Oatome mgr w a - the mNnterwlce service on the equipment listed below. at the monthlY Clnren Indkxad. The terms and 0011640 0111 of tfse 8441C Mdntenwe Ae,wnent M of forth on the fan and "M ride thereof we the tame and mndlNaN appliubla. site MOORL NO. OIKXWIim /gmALN(L Orr. UWTCNO. Mo. CNeL 9 • v s S/N - 51621069762 1 $16.00 $26.00 10 ° " • SIN - 51621069627 1 $26.00 $26.00 ll • SIN - 51621069659 1 $26.00 $26.00 12 ' " SIN - 51621069939 1 $26.00 $26.00 13 " • SIN - 51721069666 / 1 $26.00 $26.00 14 " SIN - 51621069641 1 $26.00 $26.00 15 " " SIN - 51621080358 1 $26.00 $26.00 16 • ° SIN - 51721069917 1 $26.00 $26.00 . 17 • A SIN - 51731069576 1 $26.00 $26.00 18 " • SIN - 51621069693 1 $26.00 $26.00 19 • SIN - 51621069652 1 $26.00 $26.00 1 20 ' ° • SIN - 517210691'1 1 $26.00 $26.00 1,21 • SIN - 516210696.p7 1 $26.00 $26.00 22 5160 IBM XT w/ Communications Port, Dual 9 $19.00 $171.00 Floppy, 20meg Hard Drive, Keyboard 23 5160 IBM XT W/ Communications Port, Single 1 $17.00 $17.00 Floppy, 20meg Hard Drive, Keyboard PREYENTIVEMAIMENANCEEVERY 90 GAYS PAY• RENT -EXEC TED OUARTERLYPAYMENTS(c) XXXXXXXX SEMIANNUAL PAYMENTe(2) XXXXXXXXI EXECUTION OF THIS AGFIEF EN EXECUTION OFTHIS AOREiMENTIS UPON RECEIPT ANNUALPAYMSNTS(s) I XXXXXXX% OF INITIAL PAYMENT ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER /y Cd'ANY (�,/( NAUR AUIHDAIZEO 51ONLTUA! AP "uINTATIV, 1!Md LMII TITL! SAT! ACCEPTED BY WESTEK Wasiak Computer SarWtes. InC, AUn1pA,uD aoNATL M Aa(AasaNTATIVa IFWoe " d Dennis Raney TITI! President DATA ' "M "MI la m 0 1500 SC SUnakt St. SU14 A/B, Anehein CA 62606 (714) 6741!73 01125LtIwwr %Sul4211.FakAald,CA94= (707)676 -0186 BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Ewlltrrtant LMTation Addmt _ City of Rancho Cucamonga 9330 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamongat CA 91730 TELS71411989- 1851COMACyr Tom Smihula BdhnE Ad&m PAGE 3 of 5 P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Finance Dept. TELI CONTACT• Wittek COMPAW Sanke, Inc .Pan to PMide and dN C1JStOM4f Wife tM M=9Pt that rrlalnunMr. vnica M the MWPIrMrtt IWad balm, at eM monthly aw,* W wtxl ad. TM kab end oPMhhma o! 1M Brie Mflntanatra Aglarrlent r rt frth on Uu tan erd nrm. ties UMraot are NN terms and Mlditknl a7Plkabla. natal MODEL NO. Aynnvnt No. IBM022 e ENecDw Date 7 -1 -133 t 6p,n Diu 7 -1 -89 C -5000 onyx Computer, 512K Momoryt 20meg Hard :V INtial Aprrrlmt ® y Addendum PAGE 3 of 5 P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Finance Dept. TELI CONTACT• Wittek COMPAW Sanke, Inc .Pan to PMide and dN C1JStOM4f Wife tM M=9Pt that rrlalnunMr. vnica M the MWPIrMrtt IWad balm, at eM monthly aw,* W wtxl ad. TM kab end oPMhhma o! 1M Brie Mflntanatra Aglarrlent r rt frth on Uu tan erd nrm. ties UMraot are NN terms and Mlditknl a7Plkabla. natal MODEL NO. OCICRITtaM /MRtALUM (AV. UNR Cale. MO.Calea. 24 C -5000 onyx Computer, 512K Momoryt 20meg Hard 1 $47.00 $47.00 Drive, Internal Tape Drive 25 NEC Multisyne EGA Monitor 18 $11.00 $198.00 26 Sysdyne Monitors, Monochrome 8 $4.75 $38.00 27 Samsung Mono Display 2 $4.75 $9.50 28 5151 IBM Monochrome Display 1 $7.60 $7.60 29 NEC Monitors, Color 10 $8.55 $85.50 30 T -311 Toshtba 341E Printers 2 $18.00 $36.00 31 T -311 Toshiba 341 Printers 3 $16.00 $54.00 32 Toshiba P321SL, S 127 - ZA23241 1 $16.00 $16.00 PREVENTIVE WWTENANCEEVERY 90 DAYS PAYMENT-CHECK BILLING INTERVAL ELECTED DWIITERLYPAYMENry (4) YXXXXXXX KM4ANMtMLPAYYENT6(?) XXXXXXXX EXECUTION OF THISA GREEMENTIS UPONRECEIPT ANNUAL PAYMENTS I1) XXXXXXXX OF INITIAL PAYMENT ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER COMPANY MAYO AUTHO1112EM Wo1MTURE 11ff 11Ef lNTAT1VE IP1,W hwn ACCEPTEO EY WESTEK Y /ntak CMmwtar SnYlcn, IM. tnna TlTaa President a.; c x`. i Arnment No. IBM022 Wl Effect."0au 7 -1 -88 A Expire Date 7 -1 -AQ 1 B Iritial Ayff"nt 0 n 150060. SuNlkt 6t. SO@ AM. Anandrr, CA 02ND (714) 531.1573 Ad.4ndum C] 0 1125 Moam M Bull$ 211, Fold" CA 94M (Mn 426.0181 BASIC AWNTENANCE AGREEMENT PACE 4 of 5 eGNlprrnt Location Aat[r SdImM Ad*m ` City of Rancho Cucamonga _. 9330 Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 _ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Finance Dept. 71114710989 -1851 CONTACT, Tom SmihUla TEL, CONTACTI Wattek Computer Smko, fm aWns to provide and the Mtomcr Ww to rcept the malntano4n tarvica an the cgWpnnt lifted below. at the monthry d,r9n Indkoted. The Loma and condhiarq of the Batle Na:ntOYraoa AErernfa,t as alt forth on the fate and re re'Y War thereof re the tons and oaniitktu eppllcalle. mm M009L NO. 099CRIPTION18W.I. aTY. UMRcma. YO.CNOI. 33 Toshiba P3511 SIN - ZA343201 1 $18.00 $18.00 34 i Toshiba P351C1 S /N's - ZA145881 ZA13983 5 $23.00 $115.00 ZA13978i ZA14595'i ZA14302' 35 Toshiba P341SLr S /N's - ZA167501 3 $16.00 $48.30 ZA435161 ZA13184 " 36 Epson LO 25001 FIN's - 12011833. 2 $41.00 $82.00 110153081 37 FX -286 Epson Character Printer 1 $18.00 $16.00 38 FX -100 Epson Character Printer 1 $18.00 $18.00 /39 3550 NEC Printers 2 $22.00 $44.00 40 NEC 7730 Spinvriter 1 $22.00 $22.00 '41 IBM ProPrinter 1 $18.00_ $10.00 42 Anadox Character Printer 1 $22.00 $22.00 PRVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EVERY 9D DAYS 4JAllTEAlr ►478!X18 (1( XXXXXXXX PAYMENT-CHECK BILLING INTERVAL ELECTED. 9lNFAIMtMII'ArYEN78 (>) XX:C %X % %X EXECUTION OF THISAGREEMENT IS UPON RECEIPT OF INITIAL PAYMENT I I ANMUIl PAYYLMT9 (1I ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER t„ -a ACCETTEDBYt1ESTEK COraANr 6ppo^ our[ Nntek Computr Servkn. Inc AVMGRMEO SIGNATURE AetM )RIVEO SIGN Rlaa[t INTAT1Vl nlaee[e MTAT,V Itr.r hdtl IINN. hdJ TITII _DATG TITII Pros >�srees IIEC. DISW SO, Sunkist SL Suite AID. An&WM CA 07800 (714) 6141573 ` D 1173 kitssouA Sub tl 1. FtlntM4 CA eL517 (707)110-0160 BASIC LWMTEMA14CE AGREEMENT Location Addlni Billme Addfm AEneMnt No. TRMn99 _ Effectm Onc 7 -1 -88 _. E•oiie Data 7 -1 -89 Imoal Aynment Addendum ❑ PAGE 5 of 5 9330 Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga. CA -91710 Attn: Dina -�- L10Dt. IL1714 989- 1851CONTACn Tom SmiftUla TILL-CONTACT, Intek C mVvtr Servo. Inc prep to Provide and the Customs arm to accept the mtlnanama WIVICS on the eOGpmant listed Glow. t on m,,thty dwips, hdkned. The Timm and CoedNlmr of The Bak MaInwunoe Agreement a at forth on the tae Nd renew side lead am the Tirtro and Conditions applicable. OGSCRWTMI$9w Lho. 43 -Laser I Quadram Laser Printer 44 0 -293 okidata Character Printers 45 0 -294 okidata Character Printer 46 $20.00 Okidata Microline, S /Nls 601A0003778, 1 $23.75 607AO039076 47 $21.60 Diablo 630 Printer (Admin.) 48 $12.00 P 32 Multi -Bin Cutsheet Feeder 49 W -50 Wyse Torminals 50 $42.00 Zenith 183 Laptop N /5.25 Disk Drive 51 $21.00 Compaq Portable III Model 20 52 NBI Clone N/ 1 Ploppy Drive Orr. I UNIT CIro. 1 MO.CNDl 1 '$48.00 ACCEPTED BY WEBTEK $48.00 2 $18.00 $36.00 1 $18.00 $18.00 2 $20.00 $4C.00 1 $23.75 $23.75 1 $21.60 $21.60 2 $12.00 $24.00 2 $37.00 $74.00 2 $42.00 $84.00 1 $21.00 $21.00 L� * Price includes 38 discount •• Price includes 68 discount PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EVERYSiL DAYS M nthl Total $ 2196.95 DUAIR[IILY PAYMENTC (e) PAYMENT -CHECK BILLING INTERVAL ELECTED. OE►PANNWLLPAYaE11TOP) $12786. EXECUTION OF THIS AGREEMENT IS UPON RECEIPT OF INITIAL PAYMENT ANNUAL PAYINEN111 (1) $24781.60 THIS CONTRACT MAY BE CANCELLED BY EITHER PARTY WITH 90 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER ACCEPTED BY WEBTEK COMPANY MAMA Wessell Computer SIMIM. Inc. AMT1gm2ED 31ONAT1/Md AIIT110111TLD WOMATUR9 McI11EE1INTATIV9 nenletEMTATIVE Dennis Raney I1N.11M11 4P P.MO TITIe DAq TREa President DATE W. <I FM 4795 Orange Tree Lane. Space 6, Redlands, CA 92374 ' July 12,'1988 7 ! Sandy Ramirez The city of Rancho' Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA - r, le Dear Sandy: ComputerLand of Redlands is pleased to bid on the following %' extended warranty: ' Unit Ext*d gty Description Price Prica 6 AppleCare for Mac II 40MB $504.00 $3,026.00 6 AppleCare for RGB Monitor 60.00 360.00 1 AppleCare for Mac SE,20MB 378.00 378.00 1 AppleCare for LaserWriter Plus 420.00 420.00 3 AppleCare LaserWriter IINT 384.00 1,152.00 rry ° Total $5,334.00 All ApploCare listed above is for a one year period of time and will be honored as on -site by ComputerLand of Redlands. Loaner equipment will be available if equipment repairs will take longer tb�n 48 hours. If you have any questions or ` require any cl, ifications please do not hesitate to give me a call. ^ Sincerely, ? Mona Singer ComputerLand of Redlands i Account Representative Business Support Division FM 4795 Orange Tree Lane. Space 6, Redlands, CA 92374 FOR TWO OF THE ABOVE PER JUN 27 9A8s 2 oved'0 . cm o .—nra nncecE L 3 Punt 0 _ yet SUB TOTAL >18.a1 FHEIGHTIHDLG INSURANCE O UD 71011•i TAX TOTAL M•a ;i `[411GO1"'Slw 1 lY c smr w . O{9LIN�1 INVf1i .F n , � 1 IK V O 1 1. L r -. ;r�! M*adC*-npMY- '= 7llt 114 -MI-M Wt 910- A91•ip4 ~' 's uuxoroax r.o. w,t [xrauo w "au ,xYa¢t wrt wvac[xo. y,, s. 7117D 05 W9/ 1/ T/ •�'r� o RABID UAAK 6A, CITY M L asrwu was xo 11 NEW 70: j/0 ULA 91130 , CaICotP Irc. nT KxIXT ,o P.O. WX 10w1R \ �� aurow aY orou nr[ cmrnn 1'ASRIIN, CA 91189 36m, 1 P G Y'1 tt � ^' -F011 &Nlf'WNO USE ONLYr +Iw} mo L1 mfo, Cn: a. H WA11i1 curd IPA, 6117 4 mlpy wrtsxxvao wwtxr +.� L KVU 19ylM L- L1A'MW, N 91M 1 LI a i. P UJI%V/MA, Biro twnto ru T T e OI O N cuwu � �q rf11W iM CGOt - W.t w lan Is IOt txlr.YY Ixr rAQ W \rtRL YVW \A� "'twonorto ,qr eetw[wn ta,cwtwr[ xo cxowr[ MOIll moat P. , cw, crux wt �. ' IREI! o°ti PANTNUYlE11, ar ri A',`OEBCRPiIQNAti .".i: ua o.wt oTt' wnt ,w dUNRPRiCEa is3nAM0UNTY,!:%.'c": xccr. } t r1 Ulu�pt 1oqt � U/•UMB IlilOp _1 lum Ul-08 ASSy -ltul R 11n4C1 3t.W 3J. U0 tm: f 2 9X6U X* % 24, UII1C111192 I W.OD WOO /1EA001 ! 5M Wrij a1w1,:I1,zL/o FOR TWO OF THE ABOVE PER JUN 27 9A8s 2 oved'0 . cm o .—nra nncecE L 3 Punt 0 _ yet SUB TOTAL >18.a1 FHEIGHTIHDLG INSURANCE O UD 71011•i TAX TOTAL M•a ;i `[411GO1"'Slw 1 lY c smr w . O{9LIN�1 INVf1i .F n ar C U S T 0 11 F. R 9 I T E S U P P O R T S E R V I C E DATE: 06/09/88 CUSTOMER: QUOTATION NUMBER: 85TOW Page I NEU P.O. NLTIO£R: DIRECT ORDERS AND INQUIRIES 10: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA P.O. BOX 807 9320 BASELINE ROAD RANCHO CUCATANOA CA 91730 TECH CTR 3230181 CUSTOMER CONTACT: MR TOM SMIHULA 1710989 -1851 TEKTRONIX P.U. But 300 M/S 53 -037 B(!avertoxr Oregon 97077 TEKTRONIX sONTACT: AerU Aeon Lone Sales Representative 1- 800-835 -6100 Subject to the terns and tondltidns of this dGWOORt1 Tektrpain ulll Provide Custaasr with the aaietemance and repair smr -ioas Sdrottfied heroic. This document is subject to and inClvdes the terns and conditions of the agreement Identified above, on if no agreement is so identlfiedo the General Teras and Conditions of Service printed on the reverse and ace Exhibit attached herato. The s am ang additional orpdifferentdterms tapPmartngv innor11 rd shall on Customer inclusion Is Order Pore. 1. PERIOD OF QUOTATION: Thirtg 130) days fd11011 -- '11 /09/88. 2. PERIOD OF SERVICE: 08/02/88 through 08 /01 /kv t as noted in the equipment listing. 3. DISCOUNT (SIHOLE -SITE SCP.EOULE APPLIES): None. 4. TOTM CHAROES: $1.212.00. 5. TAXES: All charges are exclusive of aPPlieable sales and use teams. 6. PAYMENT SCHEDULE/TERMS: Seal- annual P+Useats, in advance- 7 FIELD SERVICE B080TforpequiPmentt n OUR TFSTRCNIX pal� 8. PRIOR AGREEMENT INFORMATION: This document replaces our number agreement O ur Reforence Vourpriorpurchasea -der number: O1 /8g. 03498.0)- i y�we 1. Date tj ID) if$ U. Service Telemarketing Sales nor. " f.EK= SERVIGETk I •E 'a U P P'O R 1 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMOA 't�,�QUOTATIOWWJMBER:, DATE; A/09.109 ---- --- 8378W (Coat. 11%1 0000[ AMT, NJOOOfN1IM1Q01NR1 1P^ Il0IN101NMM1IMNANMN!•. 7Il01NNKlb01N1011 0Uf 100tI11111,YNNMM7INNMMI[MMNNIOf "= ''e`'. x X LDCATIOA CODES LEGEND: 1) x X An 9320 BASELINE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 x N x XXIIXXXN)(MXMMODDOWMX=t)60=UKMWiXXMIGGLy14XXXXXXXXX1L410Xx11N%=)oL0xXNXXKKXx Lao. Producti, Serial Start End STD, Total It** Code option No. DaLs, Date price Amount I AA 4107A 9034378 0.'02/69 9/01/89 $360.00 v360.00 .s 2 AA -1207 8011230 8/0. /08 4/01/89 S229.0 1229.00 3 AA 4699 J023020 8/02/88 8/01/139 1424.00 024.00 A X X END OF E4XINIENT LIST K X X Total 41 Accepted OU Dato Title • 76kbun noy 'Y .1� y. rN r TEK CUSTOMER SERVICE GROUP EXHIBIT S -1 Supplemental Terms and Conditions of Service for Customer Service Group Maintenance Agreements L SERVICE PLANS AVARABLE A. SERVICE CENTER SERVICE PLAN 1. CALISMTIM- PLUS/REPABI SUPPORT (ACW) T� pedontn are opanIzed ca1Zra0m emit, Pala- appOUfAo. Par year b announce savay, of pnoducland. haeavendlxOdalty4se ,Ta)moMtw9PrOVbo allreca nma®Nmataerancebn0anegWcangbpr4 Ished &p. raWame W4 Chews n icb CRT rmeac law. Paris cep 2 CAUBRATKKUREPAIR SUPPORT(ACZib Tekbma will Pafam rn11 w[tralbn WWX performance Led. Ir as epp6coob. PN yam oM In aw even Cl Prod+d Talk- 0* mill Provide oPpdfKa�,Chw n cover roam pCUlodik CRT regeanentl, and i� menydc oM 3. REPAIR SUPPORT (M T614roas r4 Provide, In the oven d pro" 1xMs. of m ces• eary r .ra:N MOMI arw b fabn Im*A b PW6shod pletarerdj,tM and � � (Vwyrk. CRT r, e CALIBRATION PLUS SUPPORT (ACI) Tektronix w2l iarfdm PIe oPbnand W-02tlon andbr Perfa• mane toff u rlQacabe, Par year b ana ecTaracy of os d s ha w a prmba co To art h1 a eaMCe wMt WA fcfi6dAN ca® ,or TrAagrp rr0 tara7 A,dfCaWa M CYn'aner+ugpeitM eb b each sdeAAed caSratlon 5 CALIBRATION SUPPORT (ACZ) TatdPras me perform one cartntion andbr performance test As apnscabre. )ea• b emo,a Podud meets PAIted epeonrahone. Liarpea Cover abar and mkv cosmetic and be Wormed bp° AU10 ProdKt I*" reps t. T carat wd. wan CuftonoY napsk, Taldotlr "napyr work requeed bbrraatnte ae podocl to I AjW d 9PKW"b0ns At Pares rates. S CUSTOMER•SfTE CAUBRATON SUPPORT (ACZ) TOMranb mM pedam ene aLaatbn aMbr Pedcrosance Last " appStoye. par year b em%e Prodcl 0.011% IsAbbed soeNOro6ons (OesCa rakbabon not avaaaW on sa Takwonbt bsbunenatbn Pmdi a) MAINTENANCE OPTIONS, / 7 CAUBRATION ADD.ON (A) TaktrorVA wo Prork4 on, Mdafcnsd Camnban andbr W, marce lest as OPPkabe. br oath pnoducs spe%fed on On for of N domwent to wtech ass EdMd Is anunM. Rev. 7/17.27 S. TEST DOCUMENTATION ADD+ON Taktonh Md Provide 0, We CMxsdon O11a (CB). Alb, CW braaon OW (CA). M Bafrca A After Caldrtion Dais (CT) for arch Prodc1 spadried an face d ae document to Abldr ode Ednbe b ecrcted. S. CRT COVERAGE IV) Tckirmb wm add CRT twerap b CNtrea,,K%mapay SkWPod ( AC3Rm) .rCaraoSW'ItNbrVRsPikko&JPPP0rI (ACM and Reta k of Tie doam)aq W Meth l EMb3 b a on the lace 0. CUSTOMER SITE SERVICE PLAN TeWIVr ri0 provide ae ka, &V services at Custamr'e sae: 1. PREVENTIVE MAIMEiMNCE TekMft wto ppdrcm PrnrvonNa mabimanca at ae f an envy bendbd In the tlencmren t Te W or k servo Price list Pre We mekdenance, at TekaoW dbuaaon, may be pado mw caresarody wiN remodM merman mo, 2 REMEDALSEAVICE Taktrrces wa Wovide Sarre" maintenance. In ae wren of �sfG ra equipment bopenaonhaGardarca w �d dons. 3. RESPONSETWE Tektronix wa resporld b requests for service *am ase IRAs dawn bekwr. provided Oe IM user's We b located MOM the sPedW dbtance trop a Taid once service caner. Dbrancem.vin) TlmeMwsdkora) 0.75 S 76•(50 16 Islormoa Za ppR�oo4ss�Ponaals1e lone Is "IMInId kr tams d wCW11mrs Moan one belay 40) hmw � week. The 690�m Sat pm Monde W served bcaly by TelnronsM tcrmd kYKb IIPIa OrrO fa01lays e RELOCATION OF PRODUCTS Relocation Ot WodUCIS to B 04" COW Man Onlonet's Pradnse order may aced ae elrletdetpederdb are Will reaave Tektrcav cab gabon to v�rydtaMCs tab Ed*" Wallet a) Customer norX" TTktroH[ ftty (30) days Prior to such relocation: b) Toktronb con6m% bet 011 rebcaticn does nOt Neck tie avaiabRi d aavica: &W C) Cw timer adrses b pay W atWJJh o d dWPI Mirth may MUM bon the raksclaor, Lyon request of Customer. TektrPrSS w91 supervise product rebtallM I0-I&p dsie%B._kt marq, u+oMbp, and rareirWA MCC4 and PM a am DOW associated W4t U psrc j 1r ..if a OBLIGATIONS OF CUSTOMER C,,b,,,r &W pmnA TakJM* WOOS b eta roavec0ve Pro' dab MK+N V« taNU Is rgla0. CwbrM! tl W I er W re 0 W Ta user co paeYa wan Telmona to Ts eaten, ro«swy to PaMt semen to be performed aecWdh IOM Mtrrod kde m . 0011 �Oor l s W ebTroNk ru msty d•e^et n -9&^rY Pabnwas d earNCe. Castam,itae be MPaWLy bl IIN pgsmMlnl vada0ak and makdln d W rbmT rarnretnla400n mode W.keng, but ndemted b.Wedwrru andWepapb**AX 010 k, Bu rands traransblmofdm ad" lord" u 014udh media w a gpr d In amlecdort wall Te Periaa^mcA d WAW 4110 be bone by Cuamv. Gbtmw taW maeu Ta ar rmecoww Sts masts M ern WPMMnW aDardM1rAdats NrImld In ab user mu%W .POW was tram peadpaal b be asra«a 0 s wodtl ado! s q pu°ToraiaMa. cbepadonaordamY4^YrsspecHre adx may pee aapanded raga RA Oft mods &Kh r a ODUGATKM OF TEKTRONIX T.k"a, Pusa«ol and ox" was W foruw"ara dm h easel at da Cusmma Ws. TC lw�e A�ybnoa'Ia�and Oxrmmi ILbWY I^araarCS as oppopub. CtoPwA %) Customer tear mma a+dt aampe aba b provba0 Tarrobyeo ew a,gaaa d w m C. FBU4wARE SUBSCRIPTION SEFTMI! Talama w® apPY Cu,,,,,, aen updated Gmwae tar Wh prodal spudded u and wbn a,pD,ed b 0101,0101 TN,adr rrB adaormtae e,bn W aPdalad am UM PVd«l ePUtlAa D. $07TWARE SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE TeMmlh wal puppy Cuslanawatr sotmaeapdales ire, each pro dud merlpad a, and wen agpled b cave m tlM lama type d mode as tram a WW pros Telerants wtl atso P VAds Instal, tabu Wvo tldvm, marpa, b blamm nww&IL apWcdbn aril, trot, and pop,.MMrg rkft L,Yass caw atm wl„ kwa h • TCk- b q"Uon.aCuawW SW be raspmsib may kwA ,War d Tab M,,,, or Anayaa proVem. ormalvnbl ,r atoas e• Tb Syatenb Analyst wA almond to MAP dam Cuswasr rnd a s dbn to tram pradem or 'm agaml an admWe Pt ad W. hep trA C UMNI WpWWOMnn�lppelbele a Se"a" vie Wpm j N ppixaW. SPR'4�wu4 b Pdl ar H M Mora aaa ad a Tt W ml Willf"O ,tKUeo daad ,y:,_t wb --C L GENERAL A. sumi!. AREA - SeMm will be MV4 0 wUdn eta lodyylpnt —'W— stab" wa trA D"a of co wrb+e o* B. REPUICELIEN' PARTS b an maTt4naae d a,ry poaal Tetomda mry uas Irw «raaA I= or osurrEGes d epul a mpmwd Watt• N Pub 4011 as e]mb5m momd by TsMM* Stall bKOM0 QW1 p°P" d THGPNs. C. LWRATIONS t. TaktlMe"rot b tUgaWd uMa Vae EAWI! L To WAM aM puTrd 90 h ban da'"god,&Wud.« ntlstwd Vm fit W too of T*WonbG b To seMa errypada11 avid w rea&w u 4umouad nod '45m«ptlr a aba IOW YnPaka Pab00aa+ p bn pe0es normal "Pair. e TopeWOrrob ,alslrypadadtarmmwaCpapoesesMY• 6 To puma e,« aAParL «IOM asrNro s. To repair wl 0--abs or p20es. 2 ore a Ontarv4 MWW aral bba W-ldw p -2—,*u WW Cuaana yA be Ynobad a Tda«b' aannatara Pawn tatm A 4bu "bebwt dMTOV'OnWVW I m- ca-cal NFL 0. INSPECTION Pdo, b mme{p "de, us E.NK W M&Tft aro aAied b eypedbn w d pReptance ey T011nim. ClNtary 019 be hraked for cud, supedbn u pace/ rdaa «MSc Pram N "New Cos• rewtre1111 C �atanreTNG�a �e@enT Waded pa"m ,Ivw Palamuae. Telbada wa perto m a«A repair ^r Paco1 rates. Yupadton Ord ecmpan« will bewahed W MAN 4drdded to b,JM m« bl«e Onk"m d prod- 'wutaey or pm Tek• ba,i s4nbe m/aepe F MODIFICATION OF PRODUCTS n01HIWp may pro pit, t, *Mrg uMa b Ymoee oabrm « rePal>v/ No adddma rMrSe wB b ms" W No urMro kbd ak:adm« edBibn or 0a'Tmla d&*" r deas d a«A,saba bTek, to* will be mrobored Per tal -(Wa W4 01saxrw *' b Ywdwd - al P«ca, rates a' 818.691ASD (Prime CUSTOMERS City of Rancho Cucommnxa ADDRESS: 9320 Base Line Road CITY: Rancho Cucamonga STATES CA ZIPS 91730 ATTN: Thomas emithula P O. NO$ ' 05343.0 M. A. NOs 30032394 h' f . MONTHLY MAINTENANCE CHARGE QUANTITY MODEL 140. DESCRIPTION UNIT -EXTENDED 1 2755 -OMi UNT only 2755 Systm $ 350.00 4 CLAC204L ICS2 Communications Line $ 8.00 32.00 4 CLAC204L ICS2 Communications Line 8.00 32.00 1 7653 2550 Office Peripheral Cabins 11 /C 6 FT200P -US Monitor v /green phoarher 13 00 78.00 1 PT200P -US Monitor w /green phospher 13.00 1 cLAc808L ICS2 Capacity Extender 17.00 8 CLAC204L ICS2 Cormunications Line 8.00 64!00 2 PT20OP -US Monitor w /green ;Lospber 13.00 26.00 1 Phil -hMB 4096KB Wide -vcrd Self Interl 100.00 1 4475L 315MB Fixed Media Disk 161.00 1 46603 Streaming Tape Drive 92 00 1 FT20OP -US Monitor v /green phoapber 13 00 1 5725L ICS3 Subsystem 72 00 1 CI.AC502L I082 Com =icatlona 17.00 2 cu=4L ICS2 Cor=nications 8.00 16 b I WWl -4M8 4o96KB Widevord Memory 100.00 2 PT200P -US Monitor v /green phoarher 13 00 26 00 1 SPLg1828 -01 A -net SFr Package 20.00 1 7730H Four Disk Office Cabinet 11 /C 1 483511L Left 7TOMB Disk Drive 195 00 1 4838HL Right 770MB Add-on Disk 150 00 1 8510 -P2 Fortran 77 Compiler 65.00 1 8541 -P2 Cobol -74 Compiler 65 00 1 6525 -P Basic Interpreter /o ?I/c(, 1 8515 -P Fortran -66 Compiler p R/C 1 8081 -P2 Prise /SRA Server (%� 105.00 1 8082 -P2 Prime /SHA Interactive 70.00 Font Total: $1879.00 h' f . s_ r, 1: �r RMOMMMATIOY: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Victoria Street Improvement Project from Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue, and authorize the loi c Services Director sd5900.00 n ps of o tingency) to be fu d d from GaTax211 d - Ac o nt No 09- 4637 -8701. Backgrocnd /Analysis on June 1, 1988, City Council awarded Incorporated. Staff has received executed contract documents, bonds and and found them to be complete and proposal. ARes tted, g 36 the subject project to Bob Britton, from Bob Britton, Incorporated, insurance documents; reviewed the" in accordance with the contract r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,, q STAFF REPORT DATE: July 2G, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BV: Joel Lazo, Junior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Victoria Street Improvement Project from Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue awarded to Bob Britton. Incorporated, for the amount of 5159,500.00 0 % contingency) 0 be funded from Gas 7ax421079Fundplus RMOMMMATIOY: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Victoria Street Improvement Project from Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue, and authorize the loi c Services Director sd5900.00 n ps of o tingency) to be fu d d from GaTax211 d - Ac o nt No 09- 4637 -8701. Backgrocnd /Analysis on June 1, 1988, City Council awarded Incorporated. Staff has received executed contract documents, bonds and and found them to be complete and proposal. ARes tted, g 36 the subject project to Bob Britton, from Bob Britton, Incorporated, insurance documents; reviewed the" in accordance with the contract r c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Junior Civil Enginner M i SUBJECT: Award and execute the Professional Services Agreement for the construction surveying and staking for the Etiwanda Storm Drain System, Line 2 -1, Phase I Project, located west of I -15, north of victoria Street from the victoria Basin to north of Highland Avenue and future Route 30 Freeway, to Hackett and Kranzer. Incorporated, for the amount of Sll,e5B to be funded from Drainage Fund - Account Number 19- 4637 -8154 REC0NENOATIW: It is recommended that City Council accept the submitted proposal, award and execute the professional services agreement for the Etiwanda Storm Drain System, Line 2 -1, Phase I Project, located west of I -15, north of Victoria Street from the victoria Basin to north of Highland Avenue and future Route 30 Freeway, to Hackett and Kranzer, Incorporated, for the amount of $11,858 to be funded from Drainage Fund - Acccunt Number 19- 4637 -8154. Background /Analysis Staff has requested, received and reviewed qualifications and proposals submitted by these consultant firms: Hackett and Kranzer, Incorporated - $11,858.00 and Associated Engi.:eers, Incorporated - $14,154.00 and has determined that Hackett and Kranzer, Incorporated, is best suited to provide subject services for this project. Staff has received from Hackett and Kranzer, Incorporated, executed Professic 1 Service; _ Agreements and insurance docucents, reviewed therm and fcuna them to be complete and in accordance to the City's requirements. AResllsubmitted, cc: Purchasing 0 r — CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Junior Civil Engineer w, � _ t 6W .� SUBJECT: Award and execute the Professional Services Agreement for the construction surveying and staking for the Hillside Road Storm Drain and Street Improvement Project, located from Malachite Avenue to Archibald Avenue, to Associated Engineers, Incorporated, for the amount of $10,530 to be funded from System Developoent Fund - Account Number 22- 4637 -8746 and City -Wide Drainage Fund - Account Number 23- 4637 -8802 REC011 OWi ION: It is recommended that City Council accept the submitted proposal, award and execute the professional services agreement for Hillside Road Storm Drain and Street Improvement Project, located from Malachite Avenue to Archibald Avenue, to Associated Engineers, Incorporated, for the amount of $10,530 to be funded from system Development Fund, Account Number 22- 4637 -8748 and City -Wide Drainage Fund - Account Number 23- 4637 -8802. Background /Analysis Staff has requested, received and reviewed qualifications and proposals submitted by these consultant firms: Associated Engineers, Incorporated - $10,530 and Hackett and Rranzer, Incorporated - $7,084, and has determined that Associated Engineers, Incorporated, 1s best suited to provide subject services for this project. Staff has received from Associated Engineers, Incorporated, executed Professional Services Agreements and insurance documents, reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance to the City's requirements. Respect u ubmitied, :JL sd cc: Purchasing ' ! � LVj, �� s�fl�. ''^'nl�.i�l °i � ' -,., � r Y "�1-M�ZK•A. }i �$-y'- c _ yr,.i y.,. _• J, �— — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �s:• DATE: July 20, Ig88 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer �•_ BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement releasing DR 87 -59, located un the northwest ' corner of Fourth Street and Center Avenue, submitted by Havengate Business Center II }f" I RESO*UVATION: DR 87 -59 was approved by Planning Commission on February 10, 1988, for development of 4.88 acres located at the northwest corner of Fourth a Street and Center Avenue. As a Condition of Approval the Planning >• Commission requ!red a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the future construction of median islands on Fourth Street. f: The developer, Havengate Business Center II, has submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the construction of the median islands on Fourth Street. Respectf submitted, HM:LO•dl Attachment N It is recommended that the the Council adopt the attached Resolution k• accepting subject Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien ?¢ Agreement, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said lien, " and the City Clerk to record same., BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS DR 87 -59 was approved by Planning Commission on February 10, 1988, for development of 4.88 acres located at the northwest corner of Fourth a Street and Center Avenue. As a Condition of Approval the Planning >• Commission requ!red a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the future construction of median islands on Fourth Street. f: The developer, Havengate Business Center II, has submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the construction of the median islands on Fourth Street. Respectf submitted, HM:LO•dl Attachment N M � .�.; ��•i)�f8 ~, 4 K'ik :`!i . ^4 1Li- 1 Y�° .. •- r � �Yi•. -... •P• •b rlf- J�7 w pt V RESOLUTION NO. T58-�'16% X A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO z CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM HAVENGATE BUSINESS CENTER II AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public improvements in conjunction with building permit issuance; and WHEREAS, installation of median islands on Fourth Street established as prerequisite to issuance of building permits for Dt 87 -59 has been met by < entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Havengate Business Center II. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of $ Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County same, Recorder of San Bernardino County, Ca';fornia. rlf- J�7 w pt V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ;rl 1 �JI• I t 1 '1 1 V N TTY; —LIEN AGRL•EA9 L "SIT T1TLM nP 97 -54 i" r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1908 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for OR 87 -60, located on the west side of Red Oak Street, between Arrow Route and Jersey Boulevard, submitted by Martin J. Jaska, Incorporated RECON"ORTIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND OR 87 -60, located on the west side of Red Oak Street, between Arrow Route and Jersey Boulevard, in the Industrial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on March 7, 1988. The Developer, Martin J. Jaska, Incorporated, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements to the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $69,000 V,or and Material Bond: $34,500 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. Respe�tf submitted, :sd Attachments 3G , R>r kr>- w•�.�i'c,'i� r`�Z?iL.ro au., +�F RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION,UF:.THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ;RANCHO CUCAMOYGk, CALIFORNIA„ APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 07 -60 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on June 27, 1988, by Martin J. Jaska, Incorporated, as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of -Red Oak Street, between Arrow Route and Jersey Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, DR 87 -60; and WHEREAS, said Improvement kgreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Inprovement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 57 i M,. uu uu =11CH Efl lr�mHwy m Pf- El J - - a..�.a.�.,� ! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E'NGIIVEE MG DIVL91ON rrt E N TUL - DL7 R7 -tea EXE IBI'I`: 139 1 `Cpl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT fy, DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve H. Gilliland, Public Works InsPectorLZ+r�? SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12577, located on 19th Street, between Beryl Street and Hellman Avenue, submitted by Nordic Development RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 12577 were approved by the City Council on June 18, 1987, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $179,000 Labor and Material Bond: S 89,500 The onveloper, Nordic Development, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Res f mitred, Attachments ''a" .r � c.,.R ?. `iS, '�'..v1.iYy, •. �; J..: :.}{ ,y ar . - -• RESOLUTION 80. riv A RESOLUTION OF..THE CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF,'RANCNOr,„- ` � :r! _OF. CUCAMONGA; CALIFORNIA,t'APPROVING IMPROVEMENT,AGREEMENT '" " EXTENSION AND aIWROYEM_EMT'SECURITY, FOR, TRACT 12577 WHEREAS, tiK C11y.,Councit of the.City,of_Ranchc Lucamionga,.1,4,.12,l California, has for'its conslderation an Improvewnt-AgremeneExtensior!`, executed on July 20th; 1988; by Nordlc'Davelopewnt as developer, •for,•tho.° improvement of public right- of- wy,adjacent,to,the real'pproperty'specifically described therein, and generally located on 19th Street between•Reryl Street .. and Hellman Avenue; and WHEREAC, the installation of such improvements, dcscribedtin said' Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms - thereof, is to be done in,. conjunction with the development'of said Tract 12577 and I , WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accorpanted by good and - sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the' City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Secerity be enrl the save are neroby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement extension on h'alalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. AIL „c 2 — CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Tnspectgv—�iQ�� SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 11606 -2, located on the north side of Victoria Avenue, east of Haven Avenue, submitted by Grupe Development RECOMMEMD&TIOM It is recommended that the City Council adoot the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public Immpprovements for Tract 11606 -2 were tpproved by the City Council on March 21, 1986, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $276,000 Labor and Material Bond: $138,000 The developer, Grupe Development, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Psubmitted, Attachments 1 rF ., 46- RESOLUTION NO. SS9- -16/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RRMCHO CUCAMONGA; CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11605 -2 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension execated on July 20, 1988, by Grupe Development as devel6mer,,for the improverent of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, ant, generally located on the north side of Victoria Avenue, east of Haven Avenue; and _ WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 11606 -2; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good anJ sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of th3 City of Rancho : camonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Ie,eovement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on-behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. i. s t 1' d 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA +- STAFF REPORT '4 ` ,r�rL DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works lnspectoz —f SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreeaent Extension for Tract 12832, located on the north side of Victoria Park Lane, west of Victoria Windrows Loop, submitted by William Lyon Company RECON EWDATIOM It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 12832 were approved by the City Council on May 22, 1986, in the following amounts. Faithful Perforuance Band: $355,000 Labor and Material Bond: $177,500 The developer, William Lyon Company, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's 0ffice. Resp fitted, •- r alai: Attachments -3 r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF`RANCHO CDCA40WA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SEVJRITY FOR TRACT 12832 r California, hates for hie tsiconsideration anImprovement Agreement Exttension - executed on July 20, 1988, by William IyomCompany as developer,' for, the ,- improvewnt of public right -of -way adjacent, to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Victoria•Park y; Lene, west of Victoria Windrows Loop; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described 1n,sald' Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, it to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 12832; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by -the City Ccuncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said 14)MYgunt Agr0ment Extension and y said Improvement Security be and the sego are bersby'aPpr'eved ;rrd the Meyer is hereby authorized to sign sa +d Improvemsnt Agreement Extension on behalf-of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest tkt:oto. 11/4 ■ 9 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector' SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notire of Completion RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract Nos.. 12642 and 12935 -44 Interceptor Levee and Channel have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Boni in the amount of $8,400, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $84,000. Background /Analysis Tract Nos. 12642 and 12935 -44 Interceptor Levee and Channel - located on the southeast corner of Rochester and 111ghland Avenues. DEVELOPER: Kaufman and Broad 11601 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90025 -1748 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 8,400 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $84,000 Respec y submitted, r �RNNr�Yr. dtwT Attachment J a. Vi` RESOLUTIONI N0. 776---A141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 12642 AND 12935 -44 INTERCEPTOR LEVEE AND CHANNEL AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract Nos. 12642 and 12935 -44 Interceptor Levee and Channel have been completed to the satisfaction of the,Clty Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. �f x l i b� _?j "F J Y P RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 1 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEM THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate Is: Tract Nos. 12642 and 12935 -44 Interceptor Levee and Channel 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. Bo 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 20th day of July, 1988, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth In the contract documents for: Tract Nos. 12642 and 12935 -44 Interceptor Levee and Channel 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Kaufman and Broad ` 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Ranu.o Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Southeast corner of Rochester and Highiand Avenues CITY 0 CUCAMONGA, a aunt o Lion, Owner ` �i e a r��f �[ City Y7 GAG GVGD G� � 4 � e9et ,typ \eee< ec 2a, \9� Doa G \t� ` {t� fo9 otts tosP etfop tc P! � 7SION p OPT,•. ossel LION e� N �e O `oopc a °f ece 0. eN• pa4 2tiD \tY Npt \�fp� Aw. SNA se of Q QA met ; e �� Qe< pan l ow* illo fpr Oaea a t5 dip ees tR+ O Je�o��s9 \Dset �o et tele \9 e�te� at dpao�°'Nd co�TO �p3 �ece �g6Rp t'peest ept oe, So\ \�a s of pf a -\,s \s pe the eo` �04t o Ist; OP woopal�,Ocs�a Qs �scNo VA Gt 9 VIP 2 ' o�v��OQ�0. Ssets et1 Soso ppo o ce Qpc+\ \Std � o _ . <f se, fob se Fe \ r MM . 3 .. �.. .•,,'I:!5= :� .�uj ter` .... � , - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1968 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works InspectocNe SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOIINE7BIATION: The required street improvements for DR 84-12 have been completed, in an acceptable sinner and it is recommended that City Council accept said aimprovements, +to e s e tifAeBi dauthorize the City Clark t%he Fathulperformance the amount of $430,000. - Background/Analysis DR 84 -12 - located on the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and Etlwand+ Avenue DEVELOPER: Patscheck Development 640 Worth Tustin Avenue, Suite 103 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5430,000 ;Respect bmittad, r Attachment �r rj RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40MGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga. California 91730 M NOTICE OF COMPLETION ' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the e hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate Is: DR 84-12 2. The full now and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 801, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 20th day of July, 1988, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement sat forth in the contract documents for: OR 84 -12 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Patscheck Development _ S. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Northeast ca--ar of Arrow Highway and Etiwanda Avenue CITY OF ANCip CUCAMONGA, a sun co ation, Owner ty En r /7 r� i RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF JHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO FOR�81- 12CALFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVENENTS CONPLETION FOR, THE WOR1(12ING THE FILING OF'A M07ICE OF WHEREAS, the construction of public fayrovements for DR 84-12 have been cocpleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and the work WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion complete. is required to be {sled, ccrtifying NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. -FYI n -• - :Ati :a'�'m<'.�i' ._ .,. Pit, .. ._ .. - - -- CPCY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguiro, City Engineer BY: Steve H. Gilliland, Public Works Inspectorc�¢- SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion REC016WMrION: The required street improvements for Tract 13027 have been completed in an acceptable earner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, an.ept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the asnunt of , $93,200, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of CocPletion and authorize the City Clerk to releas3 the Faithful Performance Bond in the' amount of $932,000. Background /Analysis Tract 13027 - located on the southwest corner of Etivanda and Highland Avenues. DEVELOPER: William Lyon Company 8540 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Acctpt: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $93,200 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) S932,000 Respec f) ubmitted, ` G:SMG: Attachment J� t RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUVCIL OF THE CITY OF'RAMCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEMNG THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 1R&T 13027 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR -THE WORK *1 ' C i WHEREAS, the construction of public ieprovementz for Tract 13027 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with Y the County Recorder of San Bernerdino County. r; r .Y 3a RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: i• 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate Is: Tract 13027 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, q California 91730. 3. On the 20th day of July, 1988, there was completed an the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Tract 13027 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: William Lyon Company e' I S. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Southwest corner of Etiwanda and Highland Avenues CITY a 1K1 CUCAMONGA, a mun r ion, Owner %7t FS - ` Date sse C End Y � •J F � - i� i I The required street improvenents for Tract 13052 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said Improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds in the amount of $9,500; $19.000; $101,200, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds in the amount of $95,000; 190,000; 1,012,000. Background /Analysis Tract 13052 - located on Baseline Road, between Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Park Lane Accept: DEVELOPER: William Lyon Company 8540 Archibald Avenue /B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Maintenance Guarantee Bonds $ 9,500 Baseline Improvements 19,000 Off -Site 101,200 On -Site Release: Faithful Performance Bonds R ul bmitted, Attachment S 95,000 Baseline Improvements 190,000 Off -Site 1,012,000 On -Site 0 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecti!— SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion The required street improvenents for Tract 13052 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said Improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds in the amount of $9,500; $19.000; $101,200, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds in the amount of $95,000; 190,000; 1,012,000. Background /Analysis Tract 13052 - located on Baseline Road, between Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Park Lane Accept: DEVELOPER: William Lyon Company 8540 Archibald Avenue /B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Maintenance Guarantee Bonds $ 9,500 Baseline Improvements 19,000 Off -Site 101,200 On -Site Release: Faithful Performance Bonds R ul bmitted, Attachment S 95,000 Baseline Improvements 190,000 Off -Site 1,012,000 On -Site 0 M .T RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO.A. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13052 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction"of public improvements for Tract 13052 have been completed to the satisfzction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notiee'of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW. THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to eign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. i RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamongs, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICEETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: hereinafter doscrlbedrrealepropertythe nature interest whicA interost or estate is. Tract 13052 i 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF California RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 320 C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, 3. On the 20th day of July, 1988, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Tract 13052 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: William Lyon Company Rancho Cucamonga, County ofnSSaan Bernardino, herein California. and isidescribed as follows: Baseline Road between Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Park Lane 7 iC4% CITY OF R CUCAMONGA, a 5�— mu co D tlon, Owner A Date �/ CityoEn m n,m non Amr -un rtlraMnNGa . 1, STAFF REPORT " r- DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Te^_hnician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13722, located on the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue, submitted by The William Lyon Company RSCOMM"TIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 13722, accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign s•rid agreement and to cause said map to record. AHALYSIS /BACKGROUND Tract 13722, located on the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue, in the Medium and Medium High Developmeent District, was approved by the Planning Comission on October 14, 1.987, for the division of 24.67 acras into 120 lots. The Developer, The William Lyon Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $1,361,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 683,500 Monumentation: $ 8,400 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamcnga County Water District. C.C.dR.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. as submitted, Rl01•LB��ro Attachments 617 ti M 'Y S'i v �_ -. • Y � _. -mod __ I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE'CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFOR'• APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREDV T, IMPROVEMENT SECURI1r,'AMD FINAL MAP OF TRACT WO. 13722 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13722, consisting of 120 lots, submitted by The William Lyon Company, Subdivider, located on the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane'and Milliken Avenue has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.by� said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the'State of California, and in compliance with the requirements,of Ordinance No. 28 of said City: and WHEREAS, to meet the re uirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That pproveddandthe Mayor Ais authorized ntotexecute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk Is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. ,A � r I yS, n Ir u IT u to i yl O o w } i ° w to to 1 n to I 9 e i y p to u ; It r ar b p L IN loo", N I I11 M p It" 111 ,n In IN p y 11 n III 111 IM a IM IN Iw In p w wlHy�l to m Hwy y Y Y H M n p to .. In Y II M II N� n p n i u n Y( 1 n n u ■E 1 1 n p i n LI f IY�I� /Ie,� I ,lyu�lrr plpysy ��''.' I I I r V •1 Y1I 11w1 �\ ,� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIN]UMI1G DIMON III rmL. N TITLE: __ aa4 /377 EX =rp l s — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT` DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Seek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security Street land2 Buffalo Avenue, submitted 53Avsob _v oltmans Investment Company REC01M EATIOR It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution n (DR annd,thecCity Clerk to signasaid agreement Bandito cause said map to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND PM 11222 (DR 87 -53), located an the southeast corner of Sixth Street and Buffalo Avenue, in the General Industrial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on March 9, 1988, for the division of 28.5 acres into 6 parcels. The Developer, Oltmans Investment Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $198,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 99,000 Monumentation: S 2,700 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. - Letters Of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Hater District. C.C. &R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. Res f y ltted, RHN:LB• Attachments N 1 RESOLUTION NO. $'if —"10 A RESOLUTION-OF THEXITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RONCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11222 (OR 87 -531 (TENTATIVE - PARCEL MAP NO. 11222), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 11222 (DR 87 -53), submitted by Oltmans Investment Company; and consisting of 6 parcels, located on the southeast corner of Sixth Street and Buffalo Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission of'tW City of Rancho Cucamonga on March 9, 1988; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 11222 (DR 87 -53) is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable I*mvement Security by Oltmans Investment Company as developer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement_Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map No. 11222 (OR 87 -0) be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present sane to the County Recorder to be filed for record. �B T .isti r Y' t - a J i t tr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGMEERMG DIVMWON I " z N rmL. PARCEL Mkr _W f 222 Trr=. OR 81-53 Exmm. CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Junior Civil Engineer .'.4f $R y' :.r e, SUBJECT: Accept the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersections of Haven Avenue at 6th Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard, ind Base L1ne Road at Spruce Street as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a •Hotice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of 5218,984.00. It is recommended that the City Council accept the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersections of Haven Avenue at 6th Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard, and Base Line Road at Spruce Street as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a *Notice of Completion•, and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $215,894.00 and accept the 10% Maintenance Bond in the amount of $21,898.40 for one year, and authorize the release of the reta'Ition in the amourt of $215,894,00 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of 5107,947,00, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $218,984,00. Background /Analysis The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is $218,984.00 which includes 1 minor change order for additional striping and sand blasting. The original amount approved by Council was $215,894.00 and the revised amount approved by Council is $218,984.00. Res ts, s mltted, ,Witted, i -JL•sd cc: Purchasing �3 RESOLUTION N0. ?q —467 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY.COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF"RANCHO CUCAMONGA.- CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE TRAFFIC'SIGNALS AND - SAFETY LIGHTING AT;,THE INTERSECTIONS OF HAVEN'AVENUE AT 6TH•STREET, HAVEN AVENUE AT JERSEY BOULEVARD, ID BASE LINE ROAD AT SPRUCE STREET AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK k' WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Traffic k Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersections of Haven Avenue at 6th e Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard and Base Line Road at Spruce Street has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and •- WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying ;I the work complete. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with tha County Recorder of San Bernardino County. r+ ��e RECORDING REQUESTED BY: V_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHDNGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Cali "ornia 91730 ?. WHEN RECORDED WAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION �r NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which Interest or estate S: Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersections of Haven Avenue at 6th Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard and Base Line Road at Spruce Street 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWHGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 20th day of July, 1988, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the lntersect+•.i, of Haven Avenue at 6th Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard and Base Line Rodd at Spruce Street 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: ;covey Electric, Incorporated ` 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Traffir Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersections of Haven AvP.nup at 6th .street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard and Base Line Road dt Spruce Street CITY OF NFHO CUCAMONGA, a 1 Lratlon. Owner vote 8 3S6 [27 I City er ` k r CrfY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA� STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Junior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Accept the Base Line Beautification Proiect as complete, releaLie bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion• and approve the final contract amount of $45,990.00. RECCOMDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Base Line Beautification Project as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion', and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond to the amount of $47,330.00 and accept the 10% Maintenance Bond in the amount of $4,599.00 for one year, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $2,299.50 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $23,665.00, 35 days after the recordation of said notice If no claims have been receiYed. Also, approve the final contract amount of $45,990.00. Background /Analysis The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final cuAract amount is Y45,990•CO which includes no change orders. The original amount apprcved by Council was $47,330,00 and the revised amount approved by Council is $45,990.00. Respectfully—submitted, M:J cc: Purchasing 9Lµ n• .l, RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE BASE LINE - BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK _ra w const-ruction of the satisfaction ofethesCityne Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. ,4 r NOW, THEREFORE, be it- resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, �i RECORDING REQUESTED By, CITY OF RAN Cucamonga, z 80 CU G4 RrncOhoBO 1 California .71730 1 EN RECORDED kAIL TO: CZ I Y A, CHO 0. BOX 807 G4 Rancho C =9aCalifornia 91730 NOTICE IS N`nICE OF COMPLETIGN HEREBY Gly�1 THAT: HAT. 1s; described ibedrreal Proper is an owner Hof an tof rh Ch or estate ty, the Base interest in the t Z Line utffica °r state '" RANCHO CU2 The full rta Bea Lion Project Calif°rnig� 9320.0 Based address of the unders 0 Line Road, P, 0, Box sign d Owner is CITY OF W. hereinaft3. On the 20th s« contract descrl6fo real ay Pert Y. 1988 Cucamonga, documents Pro Jul there Y the work of lrtprovCompleted on the t} ement set forth In the Base Line B^autificatfon Pro as a whole was: name °f the Orlginai contractor for eat S• the work of Improvement S BoPark Enterprises Rancho Cuc � the real follows; amonga, Countv�erty referred to herein is Of San Bernardino, California, sit s Y of ` In the City Base Line desrribed as Line BeautlffCallon Project Road, between tTeak Wayreod of said Pro Ramona Avenuerty is the north side of Base CITY OF `r a e Muni RA8 0 CO co CAHONGA a ticn, Owner 4. P, u City y Citty a9u +k oV' — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rw STAFF REPORT �i DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguir5, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Junior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Accept the Rehabilitation of Parlous City Streets, south of Foothill Boulevard and east of Archibald + -enue, as complete, release bonds and. authorize the Ct" igineer to file a •Notice of. Completion* and appro the final contract amount of $225,340.01. RECOMMUDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Rehabilitation of Various City Streets, south of Foothill Boulevard and east of Archibald Avenue, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to'file a "Notice of Completion% and authorize the release of the Faithful Parformance bond in the amount of $156,616.45 and accept the 10% Maintenance Bond in the amount of $22,534.00 for one year, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of 511,267.00 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $78,309.23, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $225,340.01. Background /Analysis The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is $225,340.07 which includes 1 change order to be approved by council for reconstruction of on -site improvements. The original amount approved by Council was $156,618.45 and the revised amount approved by Council is $225,340.01. Resp y ubmitted, M• cc: Purchasing ti- _;8 RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION -OF-THE CITY COUNCIL OF lHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE REHABILITATION OF VARIOUS CITY STREET- SOUTH OF FOOTHILL SOULEVARO,AND EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVEN6E, AND AUTHORIZIIIG THE'FIL I NG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public Improvements for the Rehabilitation of Various City Streets, south of Foothill Boulevard and east of Archibald Avenue, has,-been . completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. Now, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work Is hereby accepted and the City Engineer Is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with :he County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ti ti ;;o RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOmGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED WAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 007 Rancho Cucamonga, Califurnia 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREB" GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate Is: Rehabilitation of Various City Streets, south of Foothill Boulevard and cast of Archibald Avenue 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is CITY OP FANCHO CUCAMONGA. 9320 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 20th day of July, 1988, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work elf improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Rehabilitation of Various City Streets, ss.jth of Foothill Boulevard and east of Archibald Avenue 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: IPS Services 5 The real property referrEJ to herein is situated in the C'ty of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardiro, C:llfornla, and is described as follows: Rehabilitation of Various C'ty Strr_ts, south of toothi`l Boulevard and east of Archibald Avenue CITY OF RANCHO CUCAeaGA, a O maniV ion, Owner // ate — uZSCity Y t, R' CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA ,p:3 STAFF REPORT 4 MA,, Date: July 20, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Gideon V. Agra, Jr. Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Ninth Street Widening arA Pavement Rehabilitation between Baker Avenue dnd. yin2yard Avenue and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor RECOME'.DATIOW: It is hereby recommended that the City Council ad pt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Initial Study parts I and II for the proposed Ninth Street Widening and Pavement Rehtbilitation and issuance of a categorical exemption therefor, and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. PACKG.'toM /ANALYSIS• In coogliance with the California Envlronaencal Quality Act and State Guidelines, the Envircraental Initial Study has been prepared to permit the construction of the sibject project. the proposed improvements generally entail the widening of the existing street travel lanes; widening to ultimate the curb retrrnt at Nadrone Avenue and reconstruction of the drainage inlets west of the Cucemonga Channel along Nintb Street. The grading that would take place for the preparation of the new roadway and shoulders profile will definitely Uprove the drainage condition in the projhct area. Right -of -Way for the proposed reconstruetimi project already exists. A majority of the parcels fronting Klnth Street wlthia the project limits are vacant and such ultimate right -of -way for any future widening shall only be required at tha time tho parcels are to be devaicped. It is the Engineering Staff's findings that the proposed project ulll not create a significant adverse impact on the arvironnent and therefore recomend that these lmoroveerts be classifier as Categorically FAempt. Re�,Py# 'Y—s- tted, Attachment 71A t ROOLDTION N0, 9T —'.1"6 A RESOLD'FION OF ME CIT7 COUNCIL OF ffiE CIRf OF FANO10 COCAMMA. CALIMOcrA APPR09Rxi ME NWI- RO UCHTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATS - COaICALCRIEHFIION POR', THE PROPOSED IRNIR STREET WIDERM AND PAPEIMM RIBAEItITATION PROJECT WFEREAS,=the Ninth Street Widening and Pavement Ribabtittatfon project between Baker Avenue and vineyard Avenue being a.Public'/. my "act shall be subject to coyly with the California;Envircnmental "Quality Act necessary to protect, rehabilitate and enhance the environmental quality of the State; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality -Act, as amended; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of,Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration all available inputs and,has reviewed same concerning the proposed Hinth Street_Wtdaning tnd Pavement Rehabilitation, Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does Inereby resolve at follows: Section 1: Tha City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approve the Environmental assessment Tritial Stun- and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Winch Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation Section 2• The City Clerk 1s directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To ba completed by applicant Environmental Assesament Review Feat For all projects requiring environmental review, thiu form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the depar-ment where the project Application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before tho Public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The Project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant givi-g further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLES Ninth Street Widenlm and Rehabilitation APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE% City of Rancho Cum P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (71 989 -1862 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECTS Rcvmeth N. LdmdlIe - Linville C.E.lL.S., Inc. 9035 Ha Ave.. Sul Ram�lD g, CA 91730 (714) 989 -3922 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) _ Ninth Street, Nadrene Avenue to Cuci=nga CReW Channel. LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOC:,L, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PEIL41TS: mmooraxv st-reet closure and construction permit from the Citv of 1 -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTS wldrssissa of the existing street section and _one iYiW i am msmr. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND.SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANYsNA _instruction Of cxLsmm street. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOFL11ATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Is the Project part of a larger project, one of a series of - ,.=Jlativo actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? This is one of the Capital BsPronWmt Project- of the City to be instructed for a safer width and to coaform to future ultimate street inurvve ants. I -2 7 t WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? x 4. create changes in the existLiq zoning or general plan designations? _ x s. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of '—" potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: imro r r: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CEW-XFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information requited for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, -nd that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date 6/29/98 Signature+- Title Civil Engineer i -3 75 CITY OF 1fANCR0 CMA`IONG PA.gT II - MTIAL SIL'DY MMROM =YTAL CRECRLIST DATE: June 29 1988 APPLICA:7Ti NW of as M CL=_a FILM;C DAM _ LOG HMERi PROJECT: Ninth Street Widmin7 and to h.Lb itatim PROJECT LOGTI017i Ninth Street Madcnne Avenuo to Cucansfaa Crmk Channel I. MRO \`L MAL 14PACTS (Explansticm of all "yes" and "maybe" answers era required an attached sheets). 6� YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Ceolaa - Will the proposal have e19Clficant raaults in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in Changes in geologic relationships? _ x b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? — t. Change in topography or around surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or madVIcation Of any unique geologic or physical features? X e• Any potential Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site coodicons? - f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? _ x g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as urthquakas, landslides, mud- slides, ground fallurs, or similar hazards? _ x h. M increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? _ x 2. Nydraloay. Will the proposal have significant results in: 6� YES MAYBE NO a. Changes in currants, or the course of d:.racelon Of flowing screams, riders. or ephemeral stream channels? .a4 - b. ranges In absorption -- X rates, drainage patterns. or the rate and aeaunt of surface ro runoff? water c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood X va cede? d. Change in the amount of surface water In any body of water? nt- _ X e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface tt vats quality? � X Ti f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? ` _ S. Change in the quantity of groundva cars, g _ either through dicest additions or with - drsvals, or through interference with am aquifer? Quality? �- Quantity? X h. She reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? — -- X 1. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding — or ssichea? X _ 7 Air Oualittv, Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indiract sources? X Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? �s JC c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or tmperaturet X �. Unto _ Flora. Will the proposal have significant results : n a. Change In the characteristics of species, in eluding diversity. distribution, or number of any .patios of plants? X b Reduction of the numbers of any . unique, :are or endangered species of plants? X 77 r YES MAYBE SO c. Introduction of Dew or disruptive species of plants into an area! X d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? X Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change to the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of arisals? X b. Reduction of the auabars of any unique, rare or endangered species of aninala? _ X c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area.mr result in a barrier to the migration or noveaeat of animals? — X d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ X S. Population. Will the proposal have significant results ins a. Will the proposal altar the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth race of the h—n population of an area? X b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X _ 6. Soelo- Eeonenie Taeears. Will the propos.il have sign111canc results ins a. Change is local or regional socic- ecotmmic characteristics, including econouic or ccrosrcisl diversity, tax rate, and prvparty values? X b. ?till project costs be equitably distributed osoag project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? X 7. Land Use and Planning Considararinm. Will the proposal have signiticaot results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned lead use of an area? X b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plant of any governmental entities? X c. M impact upon the qulafcy or quantity of existing consumptive or non- consueptive X recreational opportunities? 78' _ s; g• iraneoortati0n. Vill theYES uaY �C { rasul�ea io �• proposal have significant s• overatian Of substantial movement? i addlrloral _ vehicular S' *' b Effects on existln Q struts, or demand for new tercet construction? X _ _ 3' 0. dfmnds on existing Parking facilities. for new parking? or A, X Lion systosTmpaee upon axSlting CLlaspOLCY —^ i� a. Alterations to present elon or swvaeant of f eirwla- tan�d X i people e / r Vo•ts? f. ' Alterations to cr effects on Present an_ pir ottntial waea?- ,erne. x ` a tall traffic? , Ws transit or ` Q• Incusases In traffic hazards to motor bicyclists X or PeduteLnaT vehicle., a e, 9. Cultural Rueureu significant oe�-• 4111 the Proposal have a• A disturbance Pal to the lmtegrity of archaeological, unt010glcal, and /or ' historical resources? _ 10. Rulth. safety X Prapoul have sland Nuisance Paetora. 17111 the Qniticant results In A. Craatio or 0 0l any health hazard hazard? potential health b• Exposure of people to potential health hazards? Y� X c• A risk Of explosion or release substances Sn the of hazardous even[ at an accident? - d' An increase in the number of Individ or species of vector or Pathenosenlce.ls the organ! s,,?or exposure of people to such •• rncre.se in exiseln � Q noise levels? R f• Exposure of people to -- potentially 10120 levels? Potentially dangerous Q• The creation Of obj ectionable X odors? — h• An increase in light �- X or glare? �C �� — I X I' a R YES 1!. Aeathstics. Will the proposal have significant raOYlra in, a. The obitrucelon or degradation of any teen,: vista or view? �- X b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive sits? c. A conflict with the objective of designatad At potantial scenic corridors? 12. Utilities end hblie Services, Kill the proposal have a s,gnit,eacc need tar new syaceu, or alterations to the follaringt a. Electric polar? _ X b, Nacural or pactagod ies? X c• communications syatema? X d. Water supply? _ -- X e. Wastewater facilities? L f. Flood control scructtru? �- X Z. Solid users facilities? X h, rira protection? r .0 ,. police protection? — -- X J- Schools? X k, parks or other recreational facilities? _ X 1. maintenance of public facilities, including roads sad floud control f,cilities? X s. Ocher governaental sariices? X 11. Lnerav and Scarce lesources. Will the proposal have signlLieamc ruulcs in: a• Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? _ X b. Substantial increase In dematd upon aristing sources of energy? r X c. An increase in the demand for development of nev sources of enargy? L d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non- rantvable forma of energy, uhen feasible renewable sours of energy 4sre available? X W _ rte: R is r vR�• i y9 �� In i 7 =S %AY93 XO e. Substantial depletlon of any nonrenewable or scarce mcurel resource? x 14. Mandaeory °fndfna■ of Sfaiffiesnee. _ a• goes the project ha9ro the potential to degrade tha quality of the environment, eubstaatlally reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliMlnace a plant or animal Community. reduce the number or restrict cho range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or wllminats Important eaawplas of the major periods of California hiacoiy or prehistory? x b. Does the project have the poiential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -tees, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the vmrlroomant is one which occurs in a relacivaly brief, definitive period of time while 1q.&_ tars Impacts will eaduro well into the future). -- x c. Does the project have impacts which are _ Individually limited, but cumulativa17 considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed In connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects)• x d. Doss the project have anvirotmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ x II. DISCCSSIoq Op H`7CI10M(MAL LVALDATION (i.e., of affirmative ansvers to the above quasciona plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures), (See Attached) ` M f i 5 _ J•e III. OETERNINATION A. I, On the basis of this101:1al evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. OI find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL OE PREPARED. n I find the proposed project NAY have a significant effect on the L—J environment, and an ENYIROiMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. aI find the proposed project CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT per Article 19 Class 3 c rtign 15301 of the Cal iforn ai— En puaVtyiu`E Date_ July 2u. 1908 .g` natu e i � Y S' i FxPlanaticns for "Yes" or"i-saybe" answers to Part II - Initial Study Fnviccunental Cheddist.- lb. Ibo majority of this Proposed project involves the removal of the existing asphalt concrete pavement. The underlying soils and sub - grade will be regraded to the new profile and canparted. This will require the disruption, displacement aril cmpacticn of the soils under the rcadcny and stnulder. 8a. The Proposed widening and new Pavement ah Ninth Street mD.d possibly gpland Aancio cular volume for. local, traffic going try or � U the completion of the having a more desirable riding surface and wider pavement for safety. 8b. Per tho explanattm of Item 8a., (possible increase in traffic volumes), this could possibly decrease traffic volumes on otter east - vest streets between Grove and Vineyard Avenues, such as Arrow Tb uta. The possible increase in traffic on Ninth Street could justify the demand for ultimate widening and full bTrovenent and possibly . generate an interest for development on vacant parcels adjacent to the street. rv� r Be. Per explanations of Itero 8a. and 8b., local traffic to and from Vineyard and Grows Avenues may be rsno,raged to use Ninth Street verses Arrow lipute or Eighth Street dun to the proposed new eannstru,stice. Also as explained in Item 8b., new Lxlmtrial development could alter the nvwamnt of people and goods through this cast -west oollector street. 10e. Per explanation of Item 8a., a possible increase in traffic,volums would increase noise levels, especially if new develcpwapt is generated alcr5g Ninth Street. a 4 C Y �i yri APPENDIX E NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: _ Secretary for Resources 1016 Ninth Street, Room 1311 FRONs Sacramento, California 93&10 x- County Clerk County oI Sth Floor 2415 City of Rancho Cucamnga P.O. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attnt Gideon V. Agra Jr. Civil Engineer Engineering Design Ninth Street Nidenfn and Paveae t h Project Title ect ocat an- poe e ame o c genry pprov ng Moject City of Rancho Cuce�naa e of rson or envy Carrying Out Project Exempt tatust Chet nne - ----. Ministerial (Sec. 13073) Declared Emergency (Sec. 13011 (a)) Emergency PrOJect (Sec. 13071 !b) and (c)) X Categorical Exemption. State type and section number, easoau w y pro set exempn Act. Gideon V. Agra '- Contact (714) 989 -1862, Ext. 323 1 apP cants 1 Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No _ Date Received for Filing _J /i0 /ea gna u City Engineer Title 301 rye NOTICE OF EXEMPTION ATTACMENT Project Oescrfptian: The Project inimal widening removal and widening to uittiateastrreeet ' widths the curb returns at Madrone Avenue and reconstruction of the drainage inlets west of Cucamonga Channel along Ninth Street. Project Beneficiaries: The officesminYthe area along NfnthaStreett wSecondaryhbe business vehicular and pedestrian traffic that utilize Nfnth Street as their pattern of circulation access. M d — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: July 20, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Michael Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: Approval to adopt a Consultant selection Procedure for Federally Funded Projects through the Federal Highway Administration RECOMMEIOATION: It is" recommended that the City Council approve the adoption of a consultant selection procedure so that the City may qualify for federal funds for projects funded through FHWA. BACK4tOO/D /M&YSiS- In order to obtain federal funds for dosigr. and construction of projects financed through FNWA, the City oust establish a Consultant Selection Procedure when using a consultant for design. This is specified in the Local Programs Manual, Volume I of Caltrans. The consultant selection Procedure must address certain items such as Disadvantaged Business/Women Owned Business Enterprises, Publication of Notice .0 Request for Proposals, Selection Committee to evaluate th- proposals. submitteo, Contract Negotiations and weighted criteria for consultant selection. The City's Consultant Selection Procedures were approved by Caltrans, who administers the procedures for projects funded through FHWA, by letter dated July S, 1988. The above - mentioned procedures will be used for Arrow Bridge Widening and for all future projects where the City selects a consultant and seeks federal funds through FHWA. Respect 1 bmi ted, R Attichment H i : RHTOLUMN No. r69 —,97/ ' A RrsoLUTION or THE CITY COUNCIL OP MBE CITY 01 , RANC30 CUC11DN.A, CALIYORNIA. APPROVING A _ CONSULTANT SIU.ECrMN PROQDORE FOR FEDERALLY , PONIED PROJECTS MIRWCH THE PEUaRAL HIGHWAY AD- HINISTRATION WHEREAS the Cityiof Rancho'Cucaewnga desires to request federal participation in fund;nq�on certain projects;, and F.: WHEREAS, said proposed ipproveoent rF ires a consultant ' selection procedure approved by Caltrans, the agency to administer federal funded projects. i WHEREAS, a consultant selection prucedures has been prepared and i approved by Caltrans, by letter dated July 5, 1988, s, NON. THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.does hereby resolve as follows: Approve and accept the attached consultant selection procedure for federally funded projects through FHNA. I a 0� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS THROUGH FHWA June, 1988 The City of Rancho Cucamonga has established the following procedure for the selection of consultants: 1. Consultant Need Analysis The consultant' services oandumakes� the fi final determinatl n fofor engagement of consultants based on the following: 2 3. a. Staff expertise in the technical area of the project. b. Projected staff work load during the project period. c. Length of project. d. Project due date in relation to City's current project due dates. e. Cost effectiveness of consultant services in comparison to the use of City Staff. Preparation of Request for Pro osat NFP1 Me City will preparr, a Request for Proposal (RFP) %hich will be reviewed by Laltrans prior to distribution. The RFP will include a description of the project, the submittals required to respond to the RFP, the anticipated scope of wor% to be included in the project, the minimum requirements of the Consultant's proposal, any special requirements that will be placed on the Consultant, and an explanation of the selection procedure and criteria. The RFP will state the deadline and address for submission of proposals. Disadvantaged Business/Woman Owned Business Enterprise m I�NBEI During the RFP process the C take affirmative steps to assu as consultants when possible lists will be used to solicit requirements will be divided maximum DB/WBE participation. Of the Small Business Adain Development Agency of the Del Office of Small and Disadvant the Department of Transportatic iV of Rancho Cucamonga will re t1.9t DB/NBE's are utilized CAltrans approved OB/WBE RF'P's. Where possible,'total into smaller tasks to permit The services and assistance istration, Minority Businoss artaent of Commerce and the aged Business Utilizatto: of n will be used. '4 4. Publication of Notice of Request Por Proposals The City wilt publish a notice to the newspaper of general circulation, a local newspaper and, If time permits, in a professional publication. The City will mail notices to those consultants listed in Caltrans' Consultant register listed in the categories which may be applicable for the Project. Caltrans will furnish to the City a copy of the ' most current Consultant Register. 5. Selection Committee A Selection Committee of not less than three persons shall be appointed by the City Engineer to evaluate the proposals submitted. The committee shall include one person familiar with the technical aspects of the project and with the scope of services to be provided. The Committee will be provided with copies of the proposals submitted. The Committee will meet to discuss the materials provided and to rank the proposals received. 6. Distribution of Proposals Within one week following the dealine contained in the RFP, members of the Selection Committee will be furnished with copies of proposals that have been received. After preliminary review, the Committee will meet and evaluate the Consultants' proposals. 7. Evaluation of Proposals The Selection Committee members will review and evaluate all proposals and rank them using the Consultant Selection evaluation form (copy enclosed). The top three consultants may be requested to attend an interview and may be asked to provide additional information or clarification of points contained in their proposals if selection is not apparent from the written proposals. Proposals shall Include description of the firm's experience, qualifications and capacity fnr accomplishing the scope of work, schedule, and estimated budget. The estimated budget will not be-- considered in the evaluation process unto the ranking-has been completed. 8. Contract Neootiatfons Once the ranking has been Completed by the Selection Committ,:, the top consultant will be notified. The City Engineer or designee will conduct negotiations with the top consultant selected by the Coomittee. The negotiations will result in an agreement and will address any modification to the scope of services described in the RFP and the method and amount of compensation. If, after a reasonable effort, agreement cannot be reached with the first choice Consultant -2- G O r- 9. 10. 11 of the Selection Committee, the negotiations will be negotiate lan agreement withngtheeSelection Committee�slsecond choice Consultant. choice Consultant fail,- the City w1111 negotiate with other qualified consultants. Requirements Reeardina the Usa of Subconsultarts The Consultant selected shall be required to perform professional services within its own organization and staff, together, -with associate consultants acceptable to the City associaterconsultants shall be describedaandoidentified. if practicable, at'the time of subilssion of a proposal, only with prior consent by the City and Caltrans, may the consulyAnt use fires not identified.-in the proposal to perform: supplemental specialized services such as: Aerial and ground surveys, soil borings, exhibit preparation and other work or services up to a limit of $10,000.00. Subcontracts exceeding $10,000.00 not identified in the proposal shall contain all required provisions of the'prime contract and be competitively selected in accordance with the provisions controlling the selection of the Consultant. ARmroval of the Consultive Agreement Once the City is satisfied that negotiations are complete and an agreement has been prepared, the agreement will be ofbmthe agreement,anitfwilleYbe submitted al to a thepKncho Cucamonga City Council for approval and execution. Action by the City Council makes the wp and agreement a matter of public record. Consultants Contract Admiristratton The Rancho Cucamonga Eng1 pro gress of consultants outlined in the contract required to submit regula . Progress, problems encounti the completion of tasks. utilized by the Engineerir the consultant meets all does not occur, project reasons. Hours and ciasst will be determined molen the -3- mring Division staff monitors "Platoon milestone tasks as 19reement. The consultant 1s (Scheduled reports concerning — and and considerations affecting All reasonable procedures' -arc Division staff to insure thst ntractual deadlines. If this files document the specific cdtions of staff for this task roject scope is available. �G W CONSULTANT SELECTION EVALUATION FORM i FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS ` THROUGH FHWA Consultant Name: Address: Telephone: Contact: rj Criteria Maximum 1• Qualifications of proposed consultant project team. Including a verification of references Points Score 2. Demonstrated understanding of the scope of work as evidenced in the written 10 proposal and /or interview. 10 3. Consultant's demonstrated capability to explore and develop innovative or advanced techniques or designs, and alerting City to potential design problems and giving alternatives 4. Consultant's past record of performance in similar rand 5 work, meetingtschedules, theonumberuand of construction change type of orders (if applicable). 15 5. The present workload of the firm and the availability of staff for the project and a proposed design schedule 5 6. Familiarity with Rancho Cucamonga's requirements and procedures for the type of work requested. 7. Rancho Cucamonga's prior experience with consultant. 5 10 8. Familiarity with the geographical area of the project. 5 9. Familiarity with Caltrans and other agencies requirements and procedures for the type of work requested. _ 10 Consultant's proposed cost for required service. 10 5 11. Relevant specialized equipment available to the consultant for completion of the project. 5 12. Financial responsibility of the consultant. 13. Consideration of the firm's qualification as a Disadvantaged Business 5 Enterprise (DBE) or Women Owned Business Enterprise (UBE) firm, 10 TOTAL POIM 100 -4- W M DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT v July 20, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer Authorize the readvertising of the 'Notice Inviting '.rids' for the City Corporation Yard Phase I Project, located at 9153 Ninth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, to be funded from Capital Reserve - Account No. 25- 4285 -7043 RECOMIONTION: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the City Corporation Yard Phase I Project, located at 9153 Ninth Street and approve the attached re solution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the 'Notice Inviting Bids'. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS As Council is aware, this project was advertised, bids were received and all bids received were rejected at the regular Council meeting of June 1, 1988, due to the bids received being considerably higher than the Engineer's astimate. Staff working with the consultant has made several revisions to the plans and specifications in an effort to obtain a more reasonable bid, i.e. replacing lump sum bids with unit price bids where changed conditions might occur such as excavation for existing fuel tanks. Also, additional alternates were added so items, although extremely desirable but not mandatory, could be deleted so the major portion of work could be constructed within the budget constraints. The subject project plans and specifications have been revised by Pitassi- Dalmau Architects, reviewed by staff and approved by the City. _ Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $2,000,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for July 26 and August 2, 1988, with the bid opening at 2:00 P.M., August 23, 1988. Resp - beitted, Attachment s RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CICAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PLANS A:DD SpSCIFIrATIONS FOR IRE CITY CORPORATION YARD PROHBCT PIASB I. LOCATED AT 9153 NIYM O'T = IN SAID CITY AND AD,ZoIn NG AND DISECTINO IDE CITY cL= To AMIRTIBB TO RECRIVS BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention. of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans end specifications for 'City Corporation Yard Phase I Project". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertiseeent shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 23rd day of August 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the "City Corporation Yard Project Phase I" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C. Rancho Cucamonga, California. Bids must be made on a fors provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of City Corporation Yard Project Phase I". A Pre -Bid Conference is sched-iled for 9 A.X. August 9, 198G, at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, where bidders may present questions regarding the Bid Documents: plans, proposal and specifications. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice 1s hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing R250LUTION NO. PAGE 2 6 `k rate of per them wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the bepartment of Industrial Relations of th3 State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing 'ates of per diem office ofop the sCity sClerk ofat the nCity of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Basel Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are avallable to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the reguldtions of the California apprenticeship Council, pro erly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. FiK RESOLUTION M0. PAGE 3 The Contractor is required to cake contributions to ;funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered ppreatices or ,Journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.p6 In the employment of apprentices. otherInformation req irrementsl�vbe obtained tfrom a standards, wage industrial schedules, Rlations. ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of tho State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor each to City of ancho or mechanic himm,oUpontany Ofetheuwork hereinbefore amentioned. foraeach�calendaar Subcontractor under which said laborer workman, or mechani: is required or perm more than eight (81 hours in vfolatiou of Said Labor Code. itted to labor to Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed l Paymentstarehdefinedrinithhe Pplicable collectives bargaining agreementstfiled In accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check. or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount thatlthe bidders willnenteraintolthe Propposeamount ontracts if guarantee awarded cashier's 'scheck, certifl dt certified into such contract said check, orbondshallbecomethe Property sof the ` City of Rancho Cucamonga. bfdd If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest Cityeof RanchooCucamongaetootthhetdifferencesbetween thellow bidpanddthe second lowest bid, and the surplus, If any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. l 5 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 4 The contractaornsaid workbsallAbe be onevhundred percentf(100%)1 fethenco tract The and an add, price 50%) of the contract pricelforlsaid workashaallube given to percent of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No Proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor in accordance withitheoProvist nsaof the Contractor 'seLicenselLawg(California) "B" License Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et, seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications may be reviewed in the office of the City Engineer 9340 -8 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $70.00, said $70.00 is nonrefundable. Bidders who have purchased Bid Packages (plans, proposals and specifications) for the Bid opening of May 19, 1988, will receive a credit towards the purchase of the reissued Bid Package for this proiect. Uppon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of 525.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In with the regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). PAGE S ION M0. .• 4 +h The City of Rancho'Cueaonga, Cal and all bids. ifornia, reserves the right to reject any ti Y By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucawnga, California. Dated this day of { CaliforolD a,Athi PTEO bay ofCcunei'JC1yf Rancho Cucamonga, 6 i ATTEST: er ADVERTISE ON JULY 28, 1980 AUGUST 2, 1388 ---tr or CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ' r DATE: July 20, is A�r TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Junior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids' for the Construction of Hellman Avenue Storm Drain Ieprovoment Project from Monte Vista Street to Cucamonga Storm Drain, to be funded from Drainage Facilities Fund, Account No. 23 -1637 -8763 RECOPIMIDATION: It is recoaaended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Construction of Hellman Avenue Storm Drain Improvemrent Project from Mon *.e Vista Street to Cucamonga Storm Drain, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the 'Notice Inviting Bids'. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by A.S.L. Consulting Engineers, reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $980,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for July 26, 1968, and August 2. 1988, with the bid opening at 2:30 P.M., Monday, August 8, 1980. Respec ubmitted, RHM: :s 1 Attachment A RESOLUTION No. PAGE 2 , office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the Job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Cade as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, pro perly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprentfceable occc atlon to apply to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of tVie public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When uneoployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent to the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its ` membership through apprenticeship training an an annual basis statewide or locally, or 0. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the publie works site are making such contributions. At-/ RESOLUTION k0. PAGE 3 The Contractor and subcontractor under hi■ shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any l Staten OfaCalifornia havingato doo withwworking hoursvIsnsetbfortthh inwDivision 2. Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. Cucammoonga. twen ty- fiveldollarsi(S25S00)pforleach to the laborer,ywortwn,hor, mechanic employed fhou the au under ponanyof the work herebefore mentined.* oaehcalendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8( hours in violation of said Labor Code. to Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed such agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. check or bidderr''stbond,iPayiablehto the City cashier's check forcantamount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter Into cuch contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest City of RanchooCucamongaet oothetdifferencesbetween the shall lowebidpanddthe second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment Of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. la/ r/ v« 'i.. �' u'K. . T •..y4 e, ++(,.- i_i...�,.. }F...i-' .'(;'' 'n:r.._'. �'* •✓'..} -t�1i r"Z. 4.,1w 1:XT«.. ir1 M.xr. } {Sl. "''t;'G.' RESOLUTION NO. V'`T PAGE 4 r e No proposal will be consldere3 from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of'Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class 'A' License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business,,,and Professions Code, Sectfcn 7000 et, seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. - The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and s," Iffcations of-the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho. Cucamonga, California:" Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the offica of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00, said $35.00 is nonrefundable. Uppon written request by the bidder, copies of -the plans and specifications will be mailed when seid-request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 to cover the a cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to W City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, asset forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withhold (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of . 19 /oa sz ESO LtrT R -1,0, N No. PAGE 5 PASSED AND ADOPTED ' by d,ythe,f 1Councll O"he Ci California, this ty Of c Cucaaanga,tr ATTEST: ------UU7re—rr- ADVERTISE ON JULY 26, 1988 AUGUST 2, ign rr --mYa-r 103 I E; Mv� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 +r TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance Manager SUBJECT: ARTICLES CLAIM TRANSPORTATION FUMD.S FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988 -89 RECONNERCATION• 1. The City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the attached Article 8 Claim. 2. The City Council authorize by minute action the distribution of t' Transportation Development Act Funds (TDS) for Fiscal Year 1938 -89 for $1,059,677 BACKGROUND: - b' Each year it is necessary that the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the attached Article 8 claim form to authorize receipt of the City's Transportation Development Act Funds for street and road purposes. For Fiscal - Year 1988 -89, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive a total of $1,059,677, to Transportation Development Act Funds. Respectfu -ty submitted, Elizab Stoddard ` Finance Manager -- - ES :cm t SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED roVEANMENTS TDA ARTICLE 8a CLAIN FORM FISCAL YEAR' DATE: 1986 -89 June 29, 1988 '^ CST' PAYMENT RECIPIENT .` City of Fnncho CuLamovga : _ i}s �na: (raocx one Cox only) (Mailing A3dress) 9, Article 8, PUC Section 99400a Rene" Cucamonga, CA 91730 (C try end Zap Code) d Local Streets and Roads R Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance Manager ( ) Article 8, PUC Section 99400a Bicycle and Pedestrian (Attantion -Yams and T tle) Facilities Elizabeth Stoddard (714) 989 -1851 Ext 22E (Contact Person -Phone 110.) ' DETAIL OF REQUESTED ALLOCATION: A7ioUNT 1. Payment from Unallccated Funds ; 1,059,677 2. Payment from Reserves (DrawdOwn of funds reserved in a previous year) 0 3. Total Payment Requested (Sum of Lines 1 and 2) ; 1,059.677 CONDITION OF APPROVAL: Approval of this Claim and payment by the County AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE Auditor to this Claimant are subject (CLAIMANT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OR to monies being available, and to the Provision that such monies will be FINANCIAL OFFICER) used only in accordance with the allocation instructions, (Signature) Lauren Wasserman, City Manager (Print Name and Title) CTC USE ONLY PAYMx21T Schedule Requested: one payment Monthly y _Qtrl Other -- indicate monthly payments on the follcwing schedule: 10 1 4 8 11 2 5 9 12 3 6 t Schedule A -8 TDA Article So (PUC 99400x) and STAP (per AB 2551) Local Streets and Roads Claim FINANCIAL REPORTING FORM Claimant; City of Rancho Cucamonga Article ea (PUC 99400a) FY 1986 FY 1989 Estimated Proposed Date: July 8, 1988 STAF - (PUC 99313.3) .- FY 1988 FY 1989 Estimated Proposed t Fund Balance - 1) Beginning of liar 1) 717,346 1,051.669 1,088,785 1,059,677 Revenues t) Intergovernmental Allocations 2) 44,199 37,311 3) Interest 3) 0 4) Refunds 4) 1,850,330 2,148,667 Total Revenues 5) (sum lines 1 -4) 5) 798,661 2,148,647 - Expenditures 6) Local Streets and Roads 6) 0 -- 7) Bicycle and Pedestrian 7) Facilities (Not Art. 3) Total Expenditures 8) (Sum lines 6 -7) 8) 798,661 I 0 0 Fund Balance 9) End of Year 9) I verify that the information on this financial Reporting Form is true and accurateto the heat of my knowledge. Signed Chief Financial Ott cer - Respectfully submitted, df,�. tZZ I— 1,411ti� Elizabl4h Stoedard Finance Manager ES-cm HIR C17Y 0 RANCHO ChO�CUCAMONGA 2STAFFREP6RT7 �4 DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance-Manager C� - SUBJECT: LAKDSCAFi DISTRICTS TREE REP LACEMEPIT CONTINGENCY RECOMEND)VION: ? Establish a Reserve of Fund Balance for tree replacement in all Landscape, District Funds. The Reserve of Fund Balance will effect Fiscal Year 4987/88 financial statements. BACKGROUND: Each year an amount is appropriated for contingency tree replacement in the" event the City must replace trees within the Landscape Districts due•to unfore-een occurancess such as wind storms., If the amount appropriated for the cuntingency is not fully �'expended, the remaining appropriation: amount becomes part of Fund Balance at fiscal year end. The creation of this Reserve will be comprised of any remaining account balances in the contingency tree replacement account in each fiscal year. Respectfully submitted, df,�. tZZ I— 1,411ti� Elizabl4h Stoedard Finance Manager ES-cm !C i. —= CiTY OF RANCHO C,UCAMONGA STAIFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance: Manager SUBJECT: AFRI:AL REPAYMEAT OF CITY LLAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987/88 RECOMMENDATION: X- AffmbAV'; Authorize an additional repayment of the loan to the Agency from the City in the amount of $321,442.22. BACKGROUND: On June 15 1988, the repayment of the loan to the Agency from the City to the amount of 13,406,406.78, for fiscal year 1987/88 was approved. At that time, the Agency was carrying cn amount of $327,442.22 as tax increment that should have been sent to the Trustee. This situation was caused when the computer conversion of the Agency's financial record keeping and subsequent reclassification of tax increment revenue which occurred in the final year end audit procedures for the 1986/87 fiscal year. For these reasons, it was not apparent that these funds were due the Trustee. Approval is requcsted to effect Jame 30, 1988, financial reporting. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Stoddard Finance Manager ES :cm r� T Y' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: James C. Frost, City Treasurer BY: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance Manager SUBJECT: ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY Adoption of the annual Statement of Investment Policy is recommended for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BA AGRC OUND: In Jane, 1985, Council adopted the Statement of Investment Policy. however, Assembly Bill 1073, which set up the requirement for the Statement, also mandatod that the Statement of Investment Policy be reapproved on an annual basis. With the beginning of the 1988/89 fiscal year, reconfirmation of the City's existing investment statement is recommended. Respectfully submitted, Ci>? James C. Frost City Treasurer JF:ES:cm M P CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY PURPOSE This statement is intended to provide guidelines for the prudent investment of the City's temporary idle cash, and outline the policies for maximizing the efficiency of the City's cash management system. Tha ultimate goal 1s to enhance the economic status of the City while protecting it's pooled cash. OBJECTIVE The City of Rancho Cucamonga operates its temporary pooled idle cash Investment under the Prudent Man Rule (Civil Code Section 2261, et seq.).' This affords the City a broad spectrum of investment opportunities as long as the investment is deemed prudent and is allowable under current legislation of the State of California (Government Code Section 53600, et seq.) and other legal restrictions as the City may impose from time -to -time. investment may be made in the following media: Securities of the U.S. Government, or its agencies Small Business Administration Loans Certificate of Deposit (or Time Deposits) placed with commercial banks and/or savings and loan companies Negotiable Certificates of Deposit Banker's Acceptances Commercial Paper Local Agency Investment Fund (State Pool) Demand Deposits Repurchase Agreements (Repos) Passbook Savings Account Demand Deposits Reverse Repurchase Agreements Criteria for selecting investments and the order of priority are: I. Safety. The safety and risk associated with an Investment refers to the potential less of principal, interest, or combination thereof. The City only operates in those Investments that are considered very safe. *The Prudent Tian Rule states in essence, that 'investing... property for the benefit of another, a trustee shall exercise the ,judgement and care, under the circumstances then prevailing, which men of irudence. discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs...' Io7'8 2. Liquidity. This refers to the ability to 'cash in• at any moment to ttee with a minimal chance of losing some portion of 'principal or interest. Liquidity ,is an Important investment - quality, especially when the need for unexpected funds occasionally occurs. 3. Yield. Yield is the potential dollar earnings in investment can provide, and is sometimes described as the rate of return. Safekeeping. Securities purchased from brokers /dealers shall be held i0 third party safekeeping by the trust department of our local bank or other designated third party trust, in the City's control whenever possible'. The City strives to maintain the level of investment of all funds as near 100% as possible, through daily and projected cash flow determinatiuns. Idle cash management and investment transactiorrs are the responsibility of the City Treasurer alai /or his appointed designee. The City Treasurer shall be responsible for reviewing and+rodifying investment guidelines as conditions warrant and submit same for re- approval to the City Council on at least an annual basis. However, the City Treasurer may, at any time, further restrict th5 items approved for purchase as deemed appropriate. The basic premise underlying the City's investment philosophy is, and will continue to be. to insure that money is always safe and available when needed. l� Jame rest City Treasurer City of Rancho Cucamonga M17& 11 t� t a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988` I TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10981 - ?;Men' u Appeal o ann ng me ss on requ remen s or full width improvements to 8th Street (2) undergrounding of existing overhead utilities, and (3S in -lieu fees for future undergrounding of existing overhead railroad comeunication lines for a subdivision of 18.28 acres of land into 4 parcels to the General Industrial Development District, subarea No. 3, located between 7th and 8th Streets, east of Hellman Avenue (APM 209 - 171 -58) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this item be set for a public hearing on the August 17, 1988 City Council agenda. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Parcel Map No. 10981 was approved by the Planning Commission on June 22, 1988. This action has been appealed to the City Council, and as such requires that a public hearing be set. To allow for publication and mailing of Notices of the Hearing, a public hearing should be scheduled for the regular City Council meeting of August 17, 1988. ResDectfull mlticd, r RHM: . w Attachment r e — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAN? 9897 aam ss on ac son requiring a medianeisl nd,within'Terra Vista Parkway for a subdivision of'17.08 acres of land-lnto 3 parcels in the Terra Vista Planned Comaunity,'located ` on the southeast corner of Church Street and, Terra Vista Parkway (APN 1070- 421 -06, 1077- 091 -17) RECOMNENOKTId1: Staff recommends that this item be set for a public hearing on the August 17. 1988 City Council agenda. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Parcel Map No. 9897 was approved by the Pinning Commission on June 22, 1988. This action has been appealed to the City Council, and as such requires that a public hearing be set. To allow for publication and mailing of Notices of the Hearing, a public hearing should be scheduled for the regular City Council meeting of August 17, 1988. Respectfal-ly, submitted, RHM:BRH:dlw Attachment -a r° iY �.1 .f r �a i J17 alL - - n. Ordinance No. 361 RIYN rrE�u ODf� 88 OZ Yega 3 r FINNED TITLE, P2o,, riot. �icndary I ,`UNITY E\HIBM ghland Avenue JLJ y ()� FC URC — :TORIA P NNED MMUNITY 6- El SA C. 0 V.P.C. 2 1 1 — ^� hIIIor Avenue < re y' .Air / 4 co eI On 1 V.P• NEW DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NAP DEPICTING THE OUT PARCELS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY NOR aae ORDINANCE NO. 362 w AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COC1tONGA. CALIFORNIA. ADOPTING VICTORIA PLANM 0ONMNi1T °•; AMENDMENT 88-02. AN AMNIMM TO AMMM IMITE9 (11) AREAS _ WITHIN lag VICTORIA OOMMIMITY AREA TO THg VICTORIA PLMw= (DIOUNrTY - AMN 227 -011 -08 :®ROUGH lit 227 -091 -04. 45. 461 227 - 411 - 731'227- 091-9. 26. 49. 50t 227 -091 -18 THROUGH 22. 25. 431 227- 111-01. 33. 361 227- 171 -19t 227 - 161 -10. 24. 25: 227- 111 -27. 301 227- 171 -211 227- 211 -07. 28. 391 229-021 -581 AND 227- 211 -03. 30 e ,. The City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga. California. does ordain a• follwat SECTION It The City Council hereby finds and determine@ the following: tA. That the planning Cmamiamion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing bald in the time and manner prescribed ! by lay, recommends the resoniug of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has hold a public hearing in the time and manner yvescribed by law and duly hard' and considered amid recommendation. B. That this Community Man amendment is consistent with the Cenral Man of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this Community Man amendment is consistent with the General Man of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. D. This Community Man amendment will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2t The Community Man of the Vittoria Manned CommunLM to hereby amended as indicated on Exhibits "A ". "8 "and "C." SECTION 31 The Mayor shall sign thin Ordinance and the City Clerk shall can" the acme to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at I@ at once in The Daily Report, A newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California. 113 ordinance Pisa 4 i 1 1. yr a,4 RWP4�4 J •'. LAM WN NORTH ffE%b TRLE1_ E✓tri�/row5., vj /�_; <� EXHIBIT, B SCALE, V `1` ZA • f `++ }yy r M1 WN NORTH ffE%b TRLE1_ E✓tri�/row5., vj /�_; <� EXHIBIT, B SCALE, V `1` i it e�t i V > WINDROWS W ', MH mm i v MUM AVUN REGIONAL CENT e n F Ordinance No. 962 Page S I� w r� I- 1�� \mH UEMU TM-E- 111%/ i i UHINT, c ELF, 1 1 N11 � I Y � an S u c' Y z- ac V u I 0 t _4 t w O � �! Y z ' 01 w. e�t i V > WINDROWS W ', MH mm i v MUM AVUN REGIONAL CENT e n F Ordinance No. 962 Page S I� w r� I- 1�� \mH UEMU TM-E- 111%/ i i UHINT, c ELF, t: ---F 9(!�ies 12�O iii fIayd-,— not used ■ I C 0 I ORDINANCE NO. 363 AN OMMAXCS 07 TEE CITr COUNCIL 07 THE CSTT 07 RANIMO CUCAIOMUA. CALIPORMIA. AMSNDING SOESECfION 13.08.010E Oy THE RANCHO CarANCNGA MUNICIPAL OODE PERTAINING TO STORM DRAINAGE PEES - THE CITE COUNCIL 07 THE CITY 07 RANCRO CU(AM)VA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS POLLOVSt SECTION 1. Subsection 13.08.0403 is hereby mended to read, in words x and fiaures, x follows t -Be. No feet shall be charged within the Vittoria. Caryn and Terra y Vista planned Ca unity areas or the Assetment District areas. All planned local drainage facilities within the esssament district areas have been cospletely, constructed. However. in lien of atom drain fee collections. facilities within the Victoria. Caryn and Terra Vista planned reason ties shall be constructed with development, at the davaloper!s expense.- The City Engineer i shall, in the eiereiiw of bit discretion, detemine which facilities are to be .i constructed with a particular developaent as a'condition of much development. Notwithstanding the foregalvS. any property amazed within the Victoria, Caryn or Tern Vista planned committee after the effective date of this chapter shall pay a storm drain fee in an suount equal to the local drainage area few applicable to each annexed property prior to such annesltion and in effect at the time of development. SECTION 2. The Mayor shell sign this Ordinance and the City Clark shall can" the we to be published within fifrise (13) days after Its passage at least once in The Daily Ratan, a unopaper of general circulation pablichad in the City of Ontario. Califo:ais, and circulated In the City of Rsncbo Cucmongs. California. --V-/ la l °r Y•' n 4' J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A.4D CONOITI .... L� �n uiornur - M appeal or the Planning Commission's ec son erly ng the development of a school district facility consisting of a 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16,075 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportatton/maintenance building on 5.25 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), Twated on the east side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - 202- 041 -01 and 41. Associated with the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of three (3) mature trees. (Continued from April 20, 1988) I. RECOMMENDATION: While the applicant has indicated that they will reques an a iticnal continuance, staff recommends that the City Council not grant arty further continuance and address whether the land use is appropriate for this location. II. BAMCROUND: This is an appeal originally scheduled for the City ounc T on January 20, 1988. Prior to the meeting, the applicant requested a 90 -day continuance in order to explore alternatives to the Beryl site. As a result, the City Council continued the item to April 20, 1988. On April 20, 1989, the applicant again requested that the ,Jell- _ hear ng be continued for an additional 90 days. At that time, the ` Council expressed some reservations, but did agree to a continuance to July 20, 1988. Since that time, staff has been in contact with the applicant to determine if there is any new information pertinent to the application The applicant has indicated that informal conversations have occurred with the property owner of the "Bennett Lot" adjacent to the city hall facilities on Base Line Road. No firm details or commitments have been reached at this point. The applicant has not indicated that other sites have been explored. !� 7 i W y CITY COUNCIL -'STAFF REPORT c +i RE: CUP-87-A...' = July 20, 1„'v88 - Page 2 ` III. ANALYSIS: As nmited;on' the attached City Council report of January TDZ98B, the Planningy Comaission.dented the Conditional• Use Permit based on fncoapatabilities'of the land use and of the design of the warehouse and administration buildings. It is important to note that the appllcant.ris- going - through the public heering,'process because the School District facility is an administration office and warehouse location. aShould the School District decide to locate a school at,this site,,the facility would be exempt frm;the City's raview process. As noted in the recommendation, staff is suggesting that the City Council discuss whether the proposed land use, particularly the warehouse/watntenance use, is appropriate for this predominantly residential location. If the Council determines that the land use is acceptable, the Council shald send the item back to the Planning CAmalssion to resolve design issues. If the Council feels tha� the use proposed is not acceptable for this area, then them Scho Patrict would have direction to pursue alternate sites. .m Brad Bu er x City nner BB:SH :ko Attachments: Exhibi t "A" - January 20, 1988 Cit.- Council Staff Report >123 'I :r ��I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENYIROWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -41 appeal a e ann n oMM ss on s decision denying the development of a school district facility consisting of a 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16,075 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation/ maintenance building on 5.25 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - APN: 202 - 041 -01 and 42. Associated with the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of three (3) mature trees. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends denial of on one se Permit 87 -41. II. ANALYSIS• A. Back round: On December 9, 1987, the Planning Commission con uc e a public hearing to consider all elements of the proposed school district facility. At that time, several area residents, including homeowners to the east and a representative of the church to the north, expressed their opposition to the proposal. In add%tion, a petition with approximately o tln tc names of surrounding residents was submitted ` in pp proposal. After considering all aspects Of the project, the Planning Commission determined that the land use and architecture were not appropriate for this location. B. Land Use: In examining the project based on the uses proposed, e anning Co®isslon stated that the school district facility was not appropriate in the residential area for the following reasons: 1. The facility would include industrial type uses such as machine and wood shops, a paint booth, and bus maintenance area that are not permitted in a residential zone under other circumstances. n %�� v ^i ' CITY COUNCIL STAFF_ :2PORT _ CUP 87 -41 - Alta Lowe School District s' January 20, 1988 h, Page 2 2 2. The vehicle maintenance facility, together with the n machine and wood shops would generate excessive noise and vibration in the area. 3. The paint booth would generate unwarranted odors and potential hazardous contamination by airborne particulants. 4. The facility would increase heavy vehicle traffic (trucks and buses) on nearby streets which would normally be limited to residential traffic, thereby contributing to excessive noise and vibration. 5. The proposal will create excessive light and glare which will adversely impact the adjacent areas. C. Cuilding Architecture: The Planning Commission also felt that tFic arcFT ec ure proposed was not appropriate for this location. The warehouse is designed using a prefabricated metal building which 1s not compatible with the residential character of the area. Within the Industrial Specific Plan area, metal buildings are only permitted within the Heavy Industrial Designations. The Planning Commission also felt that the design of the administration building, while better than the warehouse building, was not compatible with the residential area because the 225' width is out of scale with the area. 0. expansion: ,sion: The Planning Commission expressed concern that if ♦aye proposal was approved at this location that the 5 acre pa+•cel located to the south (also owned by Alta Loma School District) might be the likely location of an expansion of this use and /or of the storage of the bus fleet which is presently stored at Chaffey College. This would further compound the adverse impacts on adjacent properties and properties in the vicinity. , Aes ully s t tt e nner BB:SH:vc a Attachments: Letter of Appeal Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Commission Reso�l�uttion of Denial CITY A RANCHO CUCAMO1:0�1 JIM A. M Z ADMINISTRAVON DEC 181987 AN 7A91IM1141A314AS A 0f{ PeA- 'Ohiok. ee -$�'�`1�..""�-Q�_ December 17, 1987 QIbt0'� /%�Olb7r+'n Hies Beverly Authelet ,= City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Rd., Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91703 re: Appeal Planning Commission Decision denying Conditional Use Application "public Pacility Uss" Dear Miss Authelett This office has been authorized to file an appeal to the planning commission decision denying Conditional Use Permit Application No. COP No. 87 -41 a request of the Alta Loss School District to establish a public facilities use on the property located on the east side of Beryl Street south of 19th Street - APN: 202- 041 -01 i 42 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The applicants contend by this filing that the planning commission arrored in evaluating the public facilities use as being inconsistent with the zoning ordinance and general plalf'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Purther, the school district finds the'-, planning commission denial results in hardships which jeopardize the delivery of educational facilities contrary to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Please find attached a check in the amount of $126.00 from the Alta Loma School District. 1 ,• u t u 1 t ' tll 1 0 1 t e l l l; 1 1' 11 11 ',11 - n' -" Y,6 1.-MI F �U�nlot Dios i n� ,ge oytio j%anN oopn4 Lout'*% 80886 1 H �o y h o n�Y tbLo l e a r�n9 t o tsc1Y ouYi'' tpn Show Intl 4 o oty boot% t tool to cn V uo�ta t d oou� c �Sy oiti 4 *ihn 8 c•012 n Scholl �iochi is 3�O&C. SOT- px c n� SI icr° � �7 k Ns. Debra Beverly Authelet _ December 17, 1987 - Page 2 Should the city have any further questions or desire additional information pertaining to this appeal please feel from to contact this office. Very truly curs, Q• ■ A or incipa Planning Consultant ` Jldi: dbo. 072 cc: Alta Loma School District Hr. Floyd Stork Carmichael -Reap, Architects IP-7 c9ETomm copy !i`'•5�J1ti C(ry OF nANCHO CUCAMONGA PoV O19ce B7 807 93M c nncA Line noad mlK'a Cuca"Mga. CAII(mnla 91730 6.10 01.DIi1b �IHAI ✓lN4 \V4A RHWl\ " a'ml'a`b �URpIIO R \NIf Y� aacorno' —' 9lalpl Nlmlpn 47902 TOTAL IFwI I�ivxiwn i r+rrivi I —" ( �b 1 (714) 98x1851 , r e'r X t t r Mr, Frank Giomaulva, 800 North Haven Avenue, Suite 450, Ontario, pager for Neils Fargo Bank handling this pie/Mft per Mid u the Tolstoy Construct, stated clartfication the improvements the Coamnity Trail. Barrye Hanson stated all improvements red to completed before recordation of a parcel sap unless or. ity project could substitute for the bonding to this Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated the t nts are going in on Parcel 1 at tM same time as tM stree is go 1n, The City is putting the street improvements in and nclude tM trail. Commissioner Chltlea stated it was the in tM Trails Committee to make this a requirement. Russ Maguire stated this is a contr 1 agreement between the City Council and the landowner. This 1 inding contract budgeted and a defined project. At this tine, u take City Council action and agreement of the property owner amand. The City has agreed within the interpretation of tM con ral agre ements and tM project that the City can extend the drat and tM grading so that Hillside Street would include the grading ratnage necessary for tM Coamnity trail across both Parcels 1 an When development occurs on Parcel 2, the developer will be obli d to complete all Improvements across both frontages of Parcel 2. The City will take on the obligation of the grading on Hill but not the obligation of building the actual physical trait. Chairman McN1el sed the public hearing. Commissioner ittea moved to approve the project as modified, Commission lakesley seconded the motion. Notion carried by the followin_ AYESi:r COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICN, MCNIEL L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14ENT AND EDWITInNU_ USE PERMIT 87 -41 - ?E�NT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: NONE IN: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY _ a « a * a -- carried ....� va.na b. - me ueveiopeenc or a school district ac y cons s ng of a 10,5000 square foot administration building, a 18,170 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation /maintenance building on 5.25 acres of land in the Low Residential Oistrict (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), Planning Commission Minutes -13- /� ! December 9, 1987 located an the east side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street APN: 202 - 041 -01 and 42. Associated with the development is a Tree ' Removal Permit requesting the removal of four (4) nature trees. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Blakesley questioned the height of the warehouse. Mr. Murphy responded 18 feet in height. Commissioner Tolstoy requnsted clarification of the distance from the south boundary line of the school property to the proposed development. property to the proposed development. Mr. Murphy responded 330 feet. CamINissioner Tolstoy asked whether staff has seen a proposal for the f, vacant property south of the proposed site. Mr. Murphy stated no, but indicated that it is currently General Planned and zoned Residential, therefore he would anticipate that it would be developed as residential single family. i x Chairman McHiei opened the public hearing. Mr. Jim Marquez, 1334 Parkview Avenue, Manhattan Beach, representing the Alta Loma School District, stated they agree and concur with the staff report. Mr. Marquez presented the background of the school district and the purchase of this property. Commissioner Chitiea questioned the size of the undeveloped parcel below the proposed site. Mr. Marquez responded 5.2 acres, the smte size of the proposed project. Commissioner Blakesley questioned what size of parcel would the school district look for in developing an elementary school. Mr. Marquez responded anywhere from five to seven acres. Ms. Rose Cayler, 9090 Hamilton, Rancho Cucamonga, representing the ` majority of the residents, namely on Hamilton, Zircon, and Opal neighboring the proposed site, stated her concerns regarding the traffic, noise, the decrease of property value, parking, and having a metal building in a residential neighborhood. Ms. Cayler stated the land should be developed as residential. Commissioner Emerick questioned Ms. Cayler how she felt if this site were to be developed as an elementary school. Ms. Cayler stated she felt the neighbors would like to see this developed as residential. Planning Commission Minutes -14- 13d December 9, 1981 Mr. Mark Vogelsang, 9071 Hamilton, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the issues of traffic congestion, noise, and feels this could attract vandalism. He felt a school would be more suitable in the area rather than tho proposed warehouse and workshops. Mr. Vogelsang would prefer to see the area remain residential. Mr. Richard Feurstein, 9582 Golden, Alta Loma, stated that warehouses, maintenance operations, and equipment yards do not belong in a residential neighborhood. He felt that the Planning Commission would not approve this unattractive of a building even in an industrial development. He agreed with the traffic congestion and the aesthetics of the proposed project. Pastor Mike Johnson, En Agape Christian Fellowship Church, agreed with the concerns of the traffic congestion and felt that a metal building should not be allowed in a residential area. Mr. Jim Marquez, representing the Alta Loma School District addressed the residents' concerns and expressed how they felt they have mitigated the traffic, security, vandalism. and street width concerns. He felt these issues and been adequately addressed and resolved. Chairman McNfel closed the public hearing. Chairman McNiel stated this proposal is significantly counter to what the Planning Commission is trying to accomplish from a lad use and design underrsta dtstheischool district's position, nto allow to its projecthinha * residential project makes no sense at all. Commissioner Chitlea agreed with Chairman McN1el on the land use issue, the circulation, and aesthetic problems. The Planning Commission would not consider this type of project anywhere else in the City, except perhaps in the heavy industrial area. Com>•issioner Chitlea stated that 19th Street is already heavily impacted and does not find the proposed solution workable. The warehouse, aesthetically, is a severe problem. The architecture alone Is another whole issue and this project has significant problems. Commissioner Chitlea stated a land swap or exchange might be pursued in orde- for the school district to relocate• — to an area in the City that would be more appropriate to in meeting both the needs of the School District and the City. Commissioner Blakesley agreed with the concerns of the citizens and with the Commissioners and addressed other issues regarding lighting and the use and storage of various hazardous waste materials that will occur at the warehouse and maintenance shops Commissioner Blakesley stated he could not find that the project contributed anything positive to the neighborhood or the City. Planning CglnmiSSign Minutes 15- 131 December 9, 1987 Commissioner Tolstoy concurred with the previous commentc of tM other Commissioner$ stating the issue is primarily land use and can't really be solved solely through design and suggested the district look at other areas within the City to relocate. Comsissioner Emerick stated in Design Review they only looked at design and not land use. The Design Review Committee felt the heavy landscaping proposal to camouf-,age the warehouse buildfng 1s not the ideal solution but the only one the School District could propose with the state limits on budget. Commissioner Emerick agreed with he neighbors' concerns and other Commissioners' comments. Commissioner Chittea moved to direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial. Coamfssfaner Tolstoy seconded the motion. Notion carried by VA following vote: (; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, 14CMIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE r r r r r r -- carried Brad Buller, City Planner, stated this item would be continued to the January 13, 1988 meeting, to be brought back as a Consent Calendar item with a Resolution of Denial. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he did not feel the bootleg buildings were appropriate in this residential area and would line to see them removed. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Commission could direct staff to proceed to work through Code Enforcement to remove the buildings. The Commission directed staff to proceed with Code Enforcement. •n�mcn i.u. naa c�an<n� AAe WAnlnnct tl / -16 BON - A request to ase a is g o an agar en u niTdiTom one story k+ two s ithin 100 fset of adjoining single faintly re sidences for a propo unit apartment project on 1.16 acres of land in the — - MedfurHl nt1a1 O1strlct (14 -24 dwelling units per acrel, located at the ses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street - AP H: 207 - 251 -22. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, p the staff report. Chairman McNfel opened the public hearing. Mr Peter Bon, applicant, 1610 Nest Holt, Pomona, req variance to move the building away from the drainage. The whole piec d is all easement and dedicated to the City. Nr. Bon presented backg n the project. Planning Commission Minutes -16- December 9, 1987 i 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONr9 STAFF REPORT I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: , A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, phasing plan, conceptual gra ng plan, conceptual landscape plan, elevations for the adeinistration and warehouse buildings, Tree Removal Permit, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoningg North - ow es Ti-M 1 (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Single family residential under construction; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Single family residential And vacant; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: M ec ce - LOW Resicenriai (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Low (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and Low- Medfum Residential 14 -8 dwelling units per acre) 1� ITEM L I . DATE: December 9, 1987 T0: Chafrman and Members of the Planning Comfssion FROM: Bred Buller, City Planner - BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -41 - ALIA LUKA SCHOUL UlblK161 - Ine Gevelopmen o a school ac y consisting of a 10,500 square foot administration office, a 16.075 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation/ maintenance building on 5.25 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - APR: 202- 0<1 -01 and 42. Associated with the development is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of 3 mature trees. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: , A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, phasing plan, conceptual gra ng plan, conceptual landscape plan, elevations for the adeinistration and warehouse buildings, Tree Removal Permit, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoningg North - ow es Ti-M 1 (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Single family residential under construction; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Single family residential And vacant; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: M ec ce - LOW Resicenriai (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Low (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and Low- Medfum Residential 14 -8 dwelling units per acre) 1� ITEM L I . PLANNING COiMISSIO TAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LLMA SCM DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The northwest portion of the site is presently laprov—eT—Mi asphalt paving, a 'bootlegged` portable building, and several portable storage receptacles. The remainder of the site 1s vacant with an average slope of roughly 2.6% from northwest to southeast. There is an existing concrete flood control channel within a City easement that cuts diagonally through the northeast corner of the site. The site also contains several ea.atyptus trees - two in the southwest corner along Beryl and others along the eastern side of the project area. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Rewired Provided Phase 1 - Offlce 1,321 1/250 5 10 Warehouse 14,754 1/1000 15 15 Phase 2 - Office 10,500 1/250 42 43 Warehouse 16,075 1/1000 16 28 3S 7I Phase 3 - Office 10,500 1/250 42 43 Warehouse 31,675 1/1000 32 32 Bus 13 73 lM F. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code conditionally pew pu6Tic ac ties /utilities within the Low Residential` District. Because there are no classrooms proposed, the project is not exempt from the City's review pror - and regulation; therefore, requires a Conditional Use Persdt. 1I. ANALYSIS• A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop a school MIFFRf facility consisting of a 10,500 square foot administration building, a 16,075 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transportation /maintenance building. The development of the facility will be handled in three phases. The initial phase will consist of the construction of the warehouse building, a parking and loading 13� r PLANNING CO MISSIO TUFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 : ALTA LOM SCFpOi. DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 3 area, the driveways, out to Beryl, and a spray booth. The warehouse will accommodate a machine and carpentry shop, bus maintenance area, and temporary office facilities. Immediately following9 the construction of the warehouse 7. building, Phase 2 will commence with the development of the adainistration office, the completion of the parking lot, and the removal of the offices from the warehouse building. With the completion of Phase 2, all 1 rovements will be completed it on the w•e *ern two- thirds of the se. At this point in time, Phase 3, the tranzpertatlon /maintenance building 1s purely conceptual. There are no f®edfate plans to construct this building. The applicant does feel, however, that there may be a need for this building in the future if the school district was to unify with another district. As a result, the applicant has provided the use as part of the overall mastcr plan for the site. The bui161ny elevation and floor plans have not been reviewed and would have to be approved prior to construction. B. Land Use: The Development Code established a list of uses that po en a y have greater impacts on adjoining properties or properties to the vicinity. Because of these potential impacts, a Conditional Use Permit is required. Such is the case with the school district facility. In considering the request, the Planning Commission may want to consider the following points, both pro and con, in determining whether the proposed use 1s appropriate for this location: Pro 1. The facility would not be located directly adjacent to any single family residences, there is a church located to the north. The flood control channel provides a physical barrier between the facility and the homes- to the east. The vacant residentially zoned property to the south is owned by the School District and there are no plans to sell the land at this time. The warehousing and maintenance facilities are separated by several hundred feet and screened by the administration building from the homes across Beryl Street. 2. Bus and truck traffic will access the site from 19th Street (355 feet to the north) thereby eliminsting additional heavy traffic down Beryl Street. Truck deliveries are estimated by the School District at two per week. 13� PLANNING CoINISS1o, rAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA- LOMA'SCNOOL DISTRICT Decmmber 9, 1907 - Page 4 3. The clt�sei, *,structure, the church, typically operates at hours opposite those of the School District. The District operates 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday while the church's peak hours are an Sunday. 4. The warehouse building is setback approximately 212 feet back f7om Beryl, 60 feet from the north perimeter, and 96 feet from the south perimeter in an attempt to minimize the impact on surrounding properties. Con I. The School District facility is ropusing several uses that may not be appropriate within a residential area. The warehousing, machine and carpentry shops, paint booth and bus maintenance are uses more typically found within the industrial area of the City. The administrative office use is generally located within comanrcfal, office or industrial locations. 2. The facility will increase heavy vehicle traffic (i.e. buses, trucks) over what would normally be expaot :d with rclidential development of the site. 3. If the School District did decide to sell off the property to the south, residential units might be located directly adjacent to the warehouse facility. 4. The warehouse building 1s a pre - engineered metal structure lacking in architectural treatment. Metal buildinggs are normaliy only allowed in the heavy industrial area. C. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (blokes ey, er c , o eman) reviewed the proposal on November 19, 1987. At that time, the Committee felt that the structures proposed were not appropriate for the following reasons: 1. Administration Building - The long (1226 feet), linear design of the building was not compatible with the residential area. The building should be redesigned in an alternative manner (i.e. V or •U' - shaped) to minimize the linear appearance. In addition, the building should incorporate two story elements to provide some vertical elements In the building design to further minimize the linear features. The Committee also recommended greater relief an the Beryl Street elevation. 136 PLANNING COIMISSIO; fAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 t Page 5 f�t 3y ae. 2. Uarehouse Building - The metal siding and roofing proposed were inappropriate within a residential area. The building should be redesigned to incorporate elements compatible with the residential area and to tie in with the sj administration building. Also, alternatives should be explored to try and minimize the height of the warehouse building to reduce its impact from the surrounding areas. 3. A decorative block wall should be provided around the perimeter of the site to screen the warehouse /service area. T' 4. The driveways located at the north and south ends of the administration building should be reduced to 30 feet in 5' width and additional landscaping should be provided at the ends of the building. S. Additional tree wells and landscape fingers should be incorporated into the design of the parking area. A median strip between the parking, stalls may bp used instead of the tree wells. 6. Dense landscape buffer should be provided along the north and south boundaries. s 7. A five foot la`dscape setback should be provided along the east boundary. B. Perimeter block walls should be constructed within the Phase 2 area and permanent irrigation and landscaping should be installed with the Beryl Street right -of -way if the administration building construction has not commenced by the time Phase 1 is coopleted. The School District stated that budget restrictions, imposed by the state, have dictated the design of the project, in particular the metal warehouse. As a result of these concerns, the Design Review Committee did no recommen approve . Subsequently, the applicant submitted revised plans for further discussion. The administration building elevations and floor plan had been modified to provide greater movement of the building, particularly along Beryl. The warehouse building, however, was still being proposed with a metal shell. The Design Review Committee (Emerick, Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed the plans on December 3, 1987 and recommended approval of the design subject to the following conditions: 1�3 r/ r. FLAVN'NG COKMISSI01 ;AFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LORA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 6 1. Extensive landscaping should be provided around the perimeter to screen the warehouse building. 2. The roll -up door on the north side of the warehouse building should be deleted. 3. The spray booth should be located further to the east. Note: The revised plans were not available to be included with the staff report. They will be available prior to the Planning Commission meeting. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee rev ewe a pro ec. on ovember 17, 1987 for compliance with City Standards. Based on this review, the Committee felt that the project could be approved subject to the addition of several conditions. Some of the conditions include: I. Twenty -six foot drive aisles should be provided throughout the project to allow access for emergency vehicles. 2. The security gates should be equipped with knox boxes to permit emergency entry to the site. 3. The existing utilities on the project side of Beryl Street should be undergrounded. 4. Cos and truck access to the site should only be permitted down from 19th Street (rather than up frog Base Line). E. Tree Removal: Associated with the development, a Tree Removal erm s necessary for the removal of three trees in order to construct the improvements on site. The two eucalyptus trees at the southwest corner of the project will be removed in order to install the entry driveway and one eucalyptus tree along the'- - east boundary will be removed when the transportation/ maintenance building (Phase 3) is constructed. In keeping with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, the removal of these trees will require replacement planting with the largest nursery - grown stock available as determined by the Planning Commission or City Planner. F. Environmental Assessment: In completing the Environmental Checklist. s a as en ified several areas that may impact properties in the area. These items, which were outlined in the Land Use section, include the industrial type uses associated with the facility and the increaser bus and truck traffic. With the exception of the paint booth. most of the l ntdchitprehsrYlh4naeindustrial etare coainewth hewaoueudgt erby 13� PLANNING COIMISSIOA GAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LONA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 7 reducing noise (assuming doors /windows are closed). Nevertheless, adverse noise impacts could be Senerated. The paint booth could be located at the east portion of the site rather than the northern portion to provide a greater separation. The increase in bus and truck traffic can be mitigated by limiting the access to the site from 19th Street. By doing so, the buses and trucks will have a minimal impact or Beryl by traveling the 350 feet rather than the 13,500 feet down to Base Line Road. The automobile traffic generated will be insignificant when viewir„ the present and ultimate volume of Beryl Street. The metal building and proposed land use would create an unattractive site incompatible with the residential neighborhood. III. FATS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to approve the project. facts to support the following findings must be made: A. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the District in which the site is located. D. That the pro posed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the proposed use complies wit) each of the applicable provisions of the Developnr:nt Code. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in Tne Da Report newspaper an public hearing notices were sent to�T ;%FeRies within 300 feet of the project site. V RECOMMENDATION: Staff recxMnds that the Planning Commission con uc a pu a hearing to receive all input and testimony on the proposal. If, after receiving all input, the Planning Commission feels that 0e design and land use proposed is cunsistent with the objectives of the General Plan and Development Code and the Planning Commission determines that the use will not have any significant environmental impacts, staff should be directed to prepare a Resolution of approval. Refs�tfu11 ubg tted, / Bra alter CitylPlanner l3 q, PLANNING-COMIts AFF REPORT CUP 87-41 -'ALTA,LOPii SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1937 Page 8 BB:SN:vc Attachments: Exhibit OR" - Site Utilization Exhibit 480 - site Plan 'C" Exhibit - phasing plan 'D" Exhibit Conceptual Grading Exhibit "ET Building Elevations Exhibit "F1 Tree Removal Plan =n TWA I "t" A�IaxroYc ® " MK[ Q'u,A4r E= IP44 o olo�o ml�o b%y/ TITI.E — N,' R- . K ,` 0 re 0 0 ? o In o �. o .I k.W 0 4tfh P*mt r ZAVP s tD o CITY OF RANCHO CC:C��IO.V;A PLA. \\I\G DIN-LSM V `V NURTiI ITE \6 — b%y/ TITI.E — Si U1S /7�1%n EXHIBIT, SLaLE• I �Fl M• CITY OF RANCHO CL'C-"'O'\GA rm.t s PLANNI\G Gl'ISM EYHIHff ALL 1 �f�- U � 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCkMO:�GA PL,%- NNI..NG Dll'I.SM MI. - oe,*f7- i,/ TffI.E: 193415-e L EXHINIT- C / cCALL. 1� z i F, >a; CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMO;CA PLA.NNI..NG EX%,SM TM.E, EXHIBM C— Z sC.kLL lqjf I CITY (T RA1C U CL'Ck,loNGA PLA -NNI\r, DR'LSION rrE%lt TITLE. EXHIBIT, a SLALL, l�� CITY OF RA:vUHO CL'CAN1pNr-A PLANNING DIVLSION TIT1.E�- � /Crvy� 'r EXHIB(T,'eS( CPT' OF RA -NCHO CUCAMONGA, TrrLE: •xe d+a/ PLANNING DI\'ISM EXHIBIT L-' —SLaLL l 4cbl� � i RESOLUTION NO. 88 -01 A RESOLUTION OF TEE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TEE CITY or RAECEO CUCAMONOA nzxyxxa THE ISSUANCE of A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, NO. E7 -41, TO DEVELOP A BCNOOL DISTRICT FACILITY CONSISTING OF AN ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, NARRMOVSE BUILDING AND TRANSPORTATION/ NAIMMULMCB BUILDING ON PROPERTY ITTRIN TNB DUE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON TEN RUT SIDE OF BERYL STREET, SOUTB OF NAIETEBNTH STREET, RANCR3 CUCAMONGA- CALIFORNIA, AND ]DIEING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TBERBOP. A. (1) Alta Loma school District has filed an application requesting the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit, No. 87 -41, to approve the development of a school district facility as described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request shall be referred to as the "Application." (ii) On December 9, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application and said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this resolution. (111) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals,` Part A, of this Resolution. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above - referenced public hearing including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The Application applies to approximately 5.25 acres of vacant land within the Low Residential District located on the east side of Beryl Street, south of Nineteenth Street; Mt a Resolution No. 88 -Ot Page 2 Is located within The Property the a aped Residential ntial ,- -- t subject alto P tsi a rch rth oL the sub !e 1 anti' fl�acant eTh as AAPIlcant id ntiAlta dLomas hsouth yoP the being devel�ithin a Low ReBl ent<al District rDistrict and Bite ngle ction R el nti& single toethe Westdof saaPresently eunder a. Within a lrrw ntia Saintly residencas andtcBrtain vacant prop rtidw°sitedis truction no pp11 -ation has Y• 01500 e cons a war houBquare toot Of district facility so to allow maintenance booth, x1151600 gtmachln0land ca16•07S consisting root Roside dlstrlctlSacilitiesala square d parkin transports to fps and a and StOrO99 Sap, Permit: District with theaar permitted within heroyeea, . e. + use The Application contradict themImmediate im nt the ndiLionlRancho cucthame n1 a aGenerallplan and a den follows: vicinity of has to the ParaonSg and would wbject site, loran eProperties in reasons as facilities ss allow dthe ns of the Ge plan and facilities code to The Provieio conditional within Low Resi establishment General and low intenas permit contem l Districts hool district administrative teCilities aucnas the develormeant to a thersurrou.ldln such The t o ndaeaive itea building, industri I uses by tPolicies and is contemplated building, the rial uses s requested is Incompatible with booth; machine and each as the transportatio the more carpentry Shop and the spray Pray paint Inconsistent and ineom) The and church y useanlbleAwith thBOloyH contemplated would be and would tac111t with welfare be materiall immediately allow Intensity residential site in the�lols Persons Inrthenial to the healththab�ect site wing respects: (mediate viclnit safety and 2 il) the °Peration of the subject /Yo Resolution No. 88 -of Page 3 maintenance facility, together with the machine and carpentry shnp, would generate excessive noise and vibration in the area! (2) the spray .Paint booth would canerata b- -Ith unwarranted odors and potential llazardcus contamination by airborne spray paint particulants; (3) necessary security lighking to protect the proposed tacility would result in excessive nighttime glare to the Surrounding- residential uses; and (4) evidence produced at the public hearing demonstrated that the adverse effects identified herein could not be successfully mitigated by the inclusion of dwielopment conditions; increase Navy (iii) The Application as contemplated would vehicle traffic from trucks and buses on those nearby streets which are normally limited to residential traffic, thus contributing to sxcessive vehicle noise cad vibration and a dangerous and contusing traffic cia:ulation pattern in the immediate vicinity Of the subject site, Of which cannot be the detrimental etPecta successfully mitigated; adm inistrative office) The proposed design of the incompatible with the single tamaleys residentialeuses andichurch facility surrounding the subject alto. The administration builCing presents a long, massive and linear design residential, (approximately 225 lest) which is not compatible with the low single family dwellings in the immediate vicinity. The warehouse building ci Se a pre- engineered mekal structure which would Only allowed, it at all, in the heavy industrial areas of the cat (v) Substantial public testimony in opposition to the Application was presented at the public hearing by oxisting residents in the immediate vicinity of the subject Bite (both by oral to and signed petitions), and such Public opposition and the detrimental effects identified herein will cumulatively increase due to the tact that the immediate vicinity is continuing to devolop �;ith Single family zesldencea and the sits immediately to the South o! the proposed residences (owned developed the Applicant Alta Loma School District) cannot be of the propose further single tamilylresidencesroruthenexpansion of the proposed u &ae onto such site. 3. subsantial this Commission Based hearing and upon the specific findings of fact set forth in / -51 r1i .I - a'AiY �4 b.: .�1 }i.,3��'�i". n •. Resolution No. 88 -01 Page 4 .� odehr 1 and d, Conclude* as Sollowe; above, this Commission hereby finds and ' c conformance wita.theThe application as proposed is not in Development code goals and policies of the General Plan and of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; detrimental to b. The application as proposed will be materially injuriiousutoipropertrties a dt� or welfare indtwill be Immediate vicinity; and identified substantial evidence presented to this Commission has the request specified ;Potential adverse effects associated with Application. in <• ,eased upon the findings and Paragraphs conclusions set forth theAppiction. 2 and 1' above, this Commission hereby denies the C g' The Deputy Secretary of the planni�g Commies . City o! Rercho Cucamonga shall certify to th. adoption of of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day Of January, 1988. PLANNINGCOMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Commission , BRAD the City DOPu Secretary of the Planning of y Rancho he foregoing Resolution was duly and�regularly yint introduced, Passed and mdOpptedatyatre Planning Commission of the C Rancho Cucamon a held on the 13th day of regular meeting of the Planning iCCmmission wit: January, 1988, by the followin g vote, to 4 l5� m F !1 Resolution No, 88 -01 Page S AYES COPOgBSIONERSs TOLSTOY NOES: . CMI TIEA, BUKES LEY, CNfTfEA, MCNIEL „ COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENTS COMMISSIONERS: NONE S \137 \PCRESOL \RC 6,2,1\ 5 ):�'y lj h t- f c'. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: Mayor and Neabers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: RIM Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT m.cm M Irmc -Ln127 - ItKXPJ06L RtLLntK - A request to pre-zone a 96 acrd por on a e n ernardino County unincorporated area (for pre - zoning purposes) to Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling unite per, acre) located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street - APR: 225 - 071 -63. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 88-01 IcKKAIe.t ALLLKLK - A request to approve a deveiopment agreemmen or evelopment and annexation of a 96 acre portion of San Bernardino County unincorporated area (for annexation purposes) located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street - APN: 225. 071 -65. I. REC"ENOATION: The Plannin3 Co®isslon recaseends adoption of the attached ordi nances approving Development Agreement 88 -U1 and Development District Amendment 88-06 for a master planned residential community on 96 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street. II. BACKGROUND: Previous Cit Council Action - On June 1, 1988, the City Council " Psi n esa u ono Intention to annex 96 acres of land located'— in County unincorporated area at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street. Subsequently, Cie City application to annex was filed with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) and is being processed. Plannin Commission Action - On June 22 1988, the Planning , Cm=T,S?on ear en ens ve testimony from Etiwanda area residents expressing concerns about the proposed project. After further discussion the Commission recommended approval of the subject applications (see attached minutes). 10 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ODA 88 -06 /DA 88 -06 - MELCHER July 20, 198e Page 2 Cit Develo went Standards will be Followed - As part of the eve opmen reeaen con ons, a app cant agrees to process this project through the City under City standards for development (see Planning Commission staff report of June 22, 1988). A City application for approval of a Tentative Tract Hap, IT 13527, has been filed and is currently being reviewed by City staff for completeness. Staff Will Meet with Etiwanda Area Residents - A meeting with City s n e appi icantrF —representative and persons who have concerns about the project is tentatively scheduled for the week of July 25, 1988. The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss plans for this proposed master planned residential development, IT 13527, as well as to review other development proposals in the City's Sphere of Influence. III. ANALYSIS: The proposed application for a master planned residential development is consistent with the City's General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling unit. per acre) (see Exhibit W). It is also consistent with the County General Plan and West Valley Community Plan which provides a base residential density of up to two (2) dwelling units per acre, plus possible density bonuses of up to 25 percent of the base zone (see Exhibit '8' and attached staff report to the Planning Commission of June 22, 1988). Although the site is currently vacant and undeveloped, the Development Agreement requires the installation of necessary infrastructure prior to development and for mechanisms to firance that infrastructure (see staff report to the Planning Commission of June 22, 1988 as will as the attached Development Agreement). Note particularly that traffic impacts will be mitigated by the realignment of Etiwanda Avenue which will be offset to the crest where the intersection at Highland Avenue will be designed to encourage traffic to proceed west on Highland Avenue. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: An environmental assessment has teen completed by Statt. No adverse effects have been identified as a consequence of the Development District Amendment or the-Annexation Agreement. Therefore, the City Council should issue a Negative Declaration for the subject applications. V. FACTS: The following findings can be made for the pre -zone de-fe— mination: 1. That the 96 acre property is suitable for a master planned residential development and is compatible with the existing General Plan designation for the land use in the surrounding area; and W CITY- COUMCIL;sTAFF.REPORT. DDA 88- 06/DA "88 -06 = jMELCHER July 20, 1988 1 Page 3 Q 2. That the proposed development desigynation will not have a significant impact on the environment; and 3. "That the propesed "amendment is in confomdnce with the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). VI. Approval of the attached Ordinances are actions in. support of annexingiapproximately 96 acres of undeveloped land to the City. Resoec ly submit d, %Bul er Brad Buller City Planner BB *�: to Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - City General Plan Map Designation County West Valley Plan Map Designations Planning Commission staff Report of June.22, 1988 Planning Commission Minutes of June 22, 1988 - Ordtnance Approving Development Agreement 88 -01 (Includes Development- Agreement) Ordinance Approving Development District Amendment 88 -D6 15� a, ,1 J VU2 DU /AC � � „`.• Y`° RDA_ ,; _ �, V �. k P 1 �1S j�fevk %xi y. ♦ Q t• P 4 ' 1Jv y ,Y '�F �y j• �• N D J 's — CITY OF RANCHO Ci.'CA ,�iONGA rrE%t[ dDA frrLE, -C-M R�� n1wN �neu MAp PLANNING DIVISION- EXHmm �rA" SCALE- ---ate tf• N Z N W 4 cc PUBLIC fa CITY OF R.- VNC•HO CT:C MAN A PLAN14ING DIVISION < c� Z 0 a a V s V Z < r " LL 0 Ito RES 3 Y I TnUl t-CUNT r W05- '/A9-F —Y rLAT' ta�PiE EXHIBrra " SCALE: PIONS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 22. 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT mcnoncm oo -w trKt -LWR/ - IMPMr. ntL6wtK - A request to pre -zono a Y6 acre portion of e San -Bernardino County unincorporated area (for pre - zoning purposes) to Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street - APN: 225- 071 -65. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 88 -01 - a request-lo approve a evveeTop� agremendeveiupment and annexation of a 96 acre portion of San Bernardino County unincorporated area (for !nnexation purposes) located at the northwest corner of Ettwanda Avenue and 24th Street - APN: 225 - 071 -65. ABSTRACT: As part of the process of annexing to the City, the applicant is requesting approval of an annexation agreement and pre - zoning of 96 acres of land northwest of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street. The pre -zone density of 2 -4 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the General Plan designation. The Development Agreement affirms the General Plan intensity of use for the parcel, guarantees the intensity of development for a period of seven years and requires the developer to participate in the financing of needed infrastructure, including fire, drainage, and traffic facilities. II. LOCATION: The site is located in the vicinity of the northwest corne - Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street (see Exhibit '10). General Plan Land Uses are: North - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Soutl - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Utility EaseAlent /open space PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 88 -06 June 22, 1988 Page 2 Development District Designations are: 1; North - County of San Bernardino Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Etiwanda Specific Plan Y East- County of San Bernardino; Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) Nest- County of San Bernardino; Utility Easement III BACKGROUND: The applicant requests approval of a requent for pre. zon ng o a 96 acre parcel of land to Low .tensity Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and approval of a Development Agreement i` for the purpose of development and annexation to the City. The parcel is now located in the unincorporated area of San Barnardino r County. On June 1, 1988, the City Council approved a resolution of intention to annex this portion of land. An annexation application has been filed with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). IV. ANALYSIS: Pre -Zonin : The property is presently unincorporated in the County OT— SanMeernardino subject to the County General Plan, the West Valley Foothills Commmity Plan, and the County Development Code. The County General Plan designation 1s residential with a permitted density up to two dwelling units per acre. The West Valley Foothills Community Plan requires development under Planned Unit Development standards. Under the County Development Code standards the base zoning under the General Plan may be increased by an earn ed density bonus of up to 25 percent. The City General Plan designation is Low Density (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). The applicant request for pre - zoning of 2 -4 &•.(ailing units per acre is consistent with the City General Plan designation. Development Agreement: Since the area is now entirely vacant wit11 no�Ta e infrastructure. the agreement spells out the current infrastructure re.p;irements placed on development in the City -, as well as mechanisms available for financing that infrastructure. The agreement also, in effect, guarantees that the intensity of development anticipated by the General Plan will remain available to the developer for a period of seven years. The following points are specified in the Development Agreement: o Density: The agreement verifies that the General Plan es gna tan is Low Density (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and that the site will be pre -zoned to Low Density (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). 166 PLANNING c01MISSION,STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 88 -06 June 22, 1988 Page 3 o Development: The site may be developed up to thre e ng units per acre, calculated by City method of ; calculation, however, the developer may apply for any density within the standards of the low residential zone. o Infrastructure Financing: Upon request of the developer, e w use s est efforts to implement available financing mechanisms, including one or more Mello -Roos districts and landscape and lighting districts. o Landsca ep_ and _Lijhting District: Developer agrees to %n a an sc —ape and TtgFi vii OIL- district. o Fire Facilities: Developer agrees to participate in a e- os s rict for fire facilities. o Drainage Facilities: If required by the City, developer agrees to participate in a Mello -Roos district for drainage facilities. o Streets: Developer agrees to construct streets to City s %n3ards (includes relocation of Etlranda Avenue). o Fees: Developer agrees to pay City's park fees and all oiFer City fees. o Reimbursement: Developer may receive a credit against required- drainage fees and systems development fees, however, such reimbursements are narrowly defined by the agreement. o Duration: The agreement runs for seven (7) years. V. ENVIRONMENTAL: An environmental assessment has been completed by s a verse effects have been identified as a consequence of the Development District Amendment or the Arvexation Agreement. Therefore, the Planning Commission should recommend approval of 6" Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act. VI. FACTS: The following findings can be made for the pro -zone Teefe— ruination: (a) That the 96 acre property is suitable for a master planned residential development and is compatible with the existing General Plan designation for the land use in the surrounding area; and lLI 5i f w 0-06 vt'd% g t h=oe a TO i aataro�dr Wit 1 deveNO t eiron {n C.0 to I%cenNah l2 rnatlfva t Al* a "EndMent �cr Dell{ above lb) sign oDosed nation °f Mith theons {n a es the ic1 sett 9D, Its De 9acreninedo4t� the `atttap %o DO kssiovN if the hootd pgreesent the 0 peg toP'�ent Vi{• facts, t of s°p�PD��nt. A �i a povetoD�en .t.. -o ca i t S to Wf olat °f nt to the %bit apt accents Rhib'ut^t�6B �� ndsspDDro p6 of sn Ppend� pgrQe� ion Rat trier VA? eye oDe °t pis iG2 W T _ W � 3 g < le o o,. T \ 2 4c J\ f ` q 3 W3AV VOIVMII3 s I I W W i y I 4 o 1 I 3M3AY AM" g �� I 1 I a 1 \\\ \ CA M U u a 0 CITY CF ►TE�i+ noa 2g_ o� aA P & -ol TITL.E+ L cA� 1 o nl M s PLANNING DIVISION HIBIT+ FX J —!_ SCALE: N0 N 6 •. z, o- 'i !1 Motion: Moved by Emerlck, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried to continue Past 11:00 p.m. adjournment. :y P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CEVELOPMENT nrSTRltr AmrwnMCMT Ra_nc ,.�.��c - ,cnn,uwc nc�bntK - A request to prezone d 96 acre portion of t e an ernar no County unincorporated area (for annexation purposes) to Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of Etivanda Avenue and 24th Street - APM: 225. 071 -65. Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 88 -01 - TERRANCE request to approve a eve opment agreement or a b acre poon of tha San Bernardino County unincorporated area (for annexation purposes). located at the northwest corner of Etivanda Avenue and 24th Street - APH: 225- 071 -65. M1ki Brett, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Gary Mitchell, 9330 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, representing the applicant, gave an overview of the request to prezone and the development agreement. The following individuals addressed the Commission in opposil.lon to thn project based on conrerns with traffic, density, proposed size of homes, Possible decrease in property values, impacts un sewEr, streets and schools. 8111 Glover, 6214 Blue Gum Court, Rancho Cucamonga Mike Wren, 6225 Colony Court, Rancho Cucamonga Thelma Standart, 5913 Etivanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Paul 8eatelmeyer, 6271 Blue Gum Court, Rancho Cucamonga Gary Burke, 6238 Blue Gum Court, Rancho Cucamonga Dean Taylor, 6236 Coluny court, Rancho Cucamonga Karl Patz, 6233 Etivanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Sandy Hauser, 13031 Blue Gum, Rancho Cucamonga, California Mr. Mitchell responded to the residents concerns and stated he would welcove meetings with the residents and City staff when the actual tract map—is- solidified and ready for presentation to the City. He advised that the trat.t will be designed with lots no smaller than those in the adjacent Tract 17659, with many lots in excess of 17,000 to 18,000 square feet. He-noted that the actual project density will be 2.3 dwelling units per acre. There were no farther comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission Minutes -14- June 22, 1988 , Chairman McN1al explained that the project would not be able to commence construction until, the affected School Districts grant their permission. He further explained that the actual proposal Wore the Commission is a request to annex into the City and that the project now is within the County's City, Jurisdiction. not be dsubject that to if y City Project anchos Cucamonga development standards, which far exceed those of the County. In response to a resident's question. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, advised that the contracts for the traffic signal at Etiwanda and Highland would be awarded at the City Council's first meeting in .July, and the signal would be operational by the beginning of school in September. Commissioner Chltlea was concerned with the project density and believed that half -acre or larger lots to be more appropriate. She felt that with a little work on the developer's part, half -acre lots are achievable. Commissioner Emerick sympathized with residents in their concern with the loss of rural environment. He noted that the County will allow the project to develop at 2 dwelling units per acre with a 25% density bonus. He felt that if the City did not agree with the developer's proposal, he would opt to develop in the County and Rancho Cucamonga would lose its design controls. Commissioner Tolstoy was concerned that after the development agreement is approved, the developer could come in with a higher density project. Mr. Mitchell advised that the Development Agreement eliminates the right of the developer to return to the County to develop. He reiterated that the tract map in its current, incomplete, design places the density well within the request of 2 -4 dwellings per acre. Commissioner Emerick asked if the applicant would object t' committing to a 2.5 dwelling unit per acre density. Mr Mitchell responded that the applicant was not present and he could not speak for him on that issue. Commissioner Chitiea stated she would be more supportive of the request if the applicant could get the density down to 2 dwelling units per acre, but felt that issue could be addressed during the design stages. She indicated that 1Y might be to the City's advantage to allow the tract to annex into the City, since it would provide the necessary design controls. Commissioner Emerick read the Development Agreement as meaning the developer did not have the automatic right to develop at the ceiling density of 3 dwelling units per acre, that density limitations were to be consistent with good design principles. Chairman McNiel concurred. Planning Commission Minutes -15- June 22, 1988 a i l i• •;,t ^,Y4, : The applicant was -not to disagree. �N, -heard Commissioner Tolstuy supported the request to annex, since, without it the City'• 1' would have no- control over the development. He asked that the developer be' - ,�i_ required to hold neighborhood meetings when the tract map is ready for'review. Mr. Buller advised that this is a typical requirement during the Design Review a Y stages of a project. Commissioner Blakesley felt the request was appropriate and supported the density concern. 1`4 Notion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Blakesley, to adopt the Resolution _ recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and Development Agreement 88 -06 (Prezone) to the City Council. Notion carried by the following vote: o� AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE A: } ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried i° Motion: Roved by McNiel, seconded by Blakesley, to adopt the Resolution ^• recommending approval of Enviro mental Assessment and Development Agreement 88 -01 to the City Council. Motion carried by the following vote: %S AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, TOLSTOY } NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried - i Planning Commission Minutes -16- June 22, 1988 z - / l i I RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED NAIL TO: Beverly A. Authelet City clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91710 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCERNING THAT PROPERTY GENEwALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETrWANDA AVENUE AND 74TH STREET THIS AGREEMENT is made rnd entered into as of the thirty -first day following final adoption of the ordinance i� Y approving it (hereinafter, the "Effective Date ") by and between r the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ( "City" hereinafter) and DORIS DAY, PRANK DE VOL and GRACE DE VOL (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Developer "). KITaA AT US A. Reeitals. (i) California Government Code Section 65864 provides as follows: "The Legislature finds and declares that:- "(a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other development to the consumer, and discourage investment in and commitment to 1 CxN, &7- 1�7 comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. "(b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing a. Policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, 1 encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, �A i and reduce the economic costs of development." (ii) California Government Code Section 65065 provides ? in pertinent part as follows: "Any city, , ray enter into a development i agreement with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this article. . . ." (iii) California Government code Section 65865.2 provides as follows: "A development agreement shall Specify the duration .of. the agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The development agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent discretionary action, provided i _r that such conditicn,, terms, restrictions, and requirement, for subsequent discretionary actions shall not prevent development of the land for the uses and to the density or intensity of development set forth in the agreement. The agreement may provide that construction ,hall be commenced within a specified time and that the project or any phase thereof be completed within a specified time." (iv) Developer owns fee title in and to that real property consisting of approximately 96 acre, generally located at the northwest corner of Etiwr.Ma Avenue and 24th Street in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino county now proposed for annexation to City. Said property is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and hereinafter in referred to as "the Site." (v) City's general plan designation for the site is low density residential (two to four units per acre). Developer and City desire to provide through this Development Agreement specific development criteria to be applicable to the Site upon its annexation to City which will provide fcr maximum efficient utilization of the Site in accordance with sound planning principles. _ (vi) This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the provisions of Article 2.5 of Chapter 4, Title 7 of the California ,overnment Code commencing with Section 65864 thereof. 3 1� � 9 t c is B. Avrpunt. x NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The parties hereby agree that City's zoning and prezoning designation for the Site hereby is deemed to be low residential (L) subject to the specific terms and provisions hereof which shall supersede conflicting standards and requirements of the low residential (L) district so long as this agreement is in full force and effect. The duration of this Development Agreement shall be seven (7) years following the Effective Date, that is, upon the expiration of the sevon (7) year period commencing immediately after the Effective Date, it Developer has not then performed construction work on the Site or any portion or portions thereof pursuant to a building permit or permits issued by city, the Site or any such portion or portions thereof ohall then be deemed to be zoned low residential (L) and the development of the Site then and thersaftor shall be governed accordingly by the then current provisions of the city's Zoning ordinance as to L zoning or the then applicable specific plan and /or zoning category succeeding thereto For the foregoing purpose, construction work shall not include preparation -of plans, engineering work or grading. 2. The following development standards and conditions shall govern the development of the Site during the term hereof, subject to the provisions of paragraph 1 hereinabove: 4 1 �b i A 'r d n s n A. City shall allow the Site to be developed to a density of up to three (3) dwelling units per acre, calculated in accordance with city,s method of calculation specified in its Development Code as of the Effective Date. Developer may apply for any density within the standards of the low residential (L) zone. B. When and if requested by Developer from time to time, City shall use its best efforts to initiate and process to completion proceedings pursuant to t)ie Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1992, the Municipal Improvement Act of 1911, the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, the Improvement Bond Act Of 1915, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and any and all other available proceedings to provide for public conduit financing for the construction of public improvements required as a condition to development of the Site or any portion or portions thereof. C. In lieu of the dedication of land located within the Site, Developer shall pay City's park fees required due to the residential development of the Site. Said park fees shall be calculated in accordance with standards in effect-at the time any such fees are due and owing. As to residential development within any final tract, said park fees shall be payable for a lot contained within a final tract when City releases utilities for occupancy of that lot for residential use. - `i F 5 ro D. subject to subparagraphs 2.E and F hereinbelow, Developer shall pay any and all city fees required as a result of development of the Site, or any portion or portions thereof, at rates current at the time payable, including, but not limited to, beautification fees, park fees, systems development foes, building permit fees, plan check fees and drainage foes. E. Developer may request and City shall extend to Developer credit against required drainage fees only to the extent of Developer's direct construction costs incurred in constructing permanent 24th Street Master Storm Drain drainage facilities required by city as a condition of developing the site or any portion or portionn thereof. F. Developer may request and City shall extend to Developer credit against required systems development fees only to the extent of Developer's direct construction costs incurred in constructing oversized facilities (i.e., facilities sized to service areas located outside of the Site) which are not located within the Site, or abutting the Site. However, if traffic signals are required by this development, the Developer shall be entitled to credit against required systems development fees to the extent above the Developer's fair share. Further, if city requires the improvement of Etiwanda Avenue between 26th Street and Highland for interim direct access to the Site, no costs thereof shall be reimbursed to Developer. . 6 /,; Z e io �b D G. Developer shall consent to the creation of an assessment district or districts to provide for the construction and maintenance of any and all lighting and landscaping within pu'olic rights -of -way within the Site or abutting the Site pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 or, if applicable, Developer stroll consent to an annexation or annexations of the Site or any portion or portions thereof to an existing assessment distriot formulated under said Act for that purpose. H. If required by city as a condition of development of the Site or any portion or portions thoreof, Developer shall consent to the application of the 140110-Roos Facilities Act of 1982 thereto to construct and maintain facilities and /or to purchase and maintain equipment reasorably necessary to provide fire protection cervices to the Site or the applicable portion or portions thereof. I. If required by City as a condition of development of the Site or any portion or portions thereof, Developer shall consent to the application of the Mello -Roos _ Facilities Act of 1982 thereto, or Developer contribution of equivalent funds, to construct regional drainage facilities. 4. Except as expressly modified heroin, all substantive and procedural requirements and provisions anntained in City's ordinances, specific plane, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, its Development code, as amended, 7 173 .. rt oa. -14..5 �5ir•',cC�Y 5�i4'e`+j'.. - 711 e..- . building code, electrical code, fire code and plumbing code shall apply to the development of: the Site pursuant to this Development Agreement. Further, any terms or phrases contained herein for .ihich there are definitions provided in City's said Develoyment Code shall be deemed to be utilized in accordance with thcso definitions. S. In accordance with California Government Code �= Section 65868.5, a certified copy of this Agreement shall be iA recorded with the Recorder of San Bernardino County, California, x' immediately upon this Agreement becoming effective. 6. The parties further agree as follows: e; 4' A. Except as expressly set forth in this y a `.` Agreement, no repreoentationo of any kind or character: have been made to one another by any of the parties hereto or Iq any of the parties' agents, representatives, associates or attorneys with respect to each subject to which this Agreement relates. B. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to each subject to which at relates. C. This Agreement can only be amended in writing, which writing must first be executed by all of the parties hereto. D. No provision of this Agreement may be waived, except in writing, which writing must be executed by all of the parties, hereto. 8 J /7-� L Vr, E. The parties hereto each agree that they shall t execute and deliver to the other, upon request so to do, any and t all documents reasonable and necessary to accomplish or evtde:ce the agreements contained in or contemplated by this Agreement. F. In the event that any party should default in one or more of its obligations provided in or cortemplated by this Agreement, the defaulting party shall pay to the other all expenses incurred in connection with efforts to enforce such obligation, including reasonable attorneys' fees, whether or not suit be commenced. G. This Agreement, all other documents and kka agreemerts provided in or contemplated hereby, and all rights and obligations arising therefrom shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, reprasent3rives, suc=ssors and aoaigns. IN WITNESS VdEREOF, the part.es have executed and enteree into this T.greemant am of the effective date of the ordinance approving this ).greeaent. Date ": Dated: 9 l� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA y By Mayor By City C erx s ORDINANCE NO. ' OF'TFIE CIIFAINI riAOMf MAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT a TO LOW OENSITY RESIDENTIAL 12-4 OWLLUM FOR 96 ACRES OF LAND LOC.LTED AT THE NOR ETIWRDA AVEMIE AM-24TH STREET, RANCHO ' { d� � i The Ci of Ranc Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: A. Recitals: c (1) Terrance Nelcher has filed an application for Development District Amendment He. 88-06 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance the subject Development District amendment is f refereed to as "the application'. ' NO On the 22 of June, 1588, the Planning Commission of the .41 of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public heario on the s` application, concluded said hearing on that date, and recomaended adoption of z' the application. A• � (iii) On the 13th of July, 1988, the City council of :he City I? of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing corserning the r application, concluded said herring on that data, and duly heard and considered the Planning Commission recommendation. B. Ordinance. HON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and ordained by the-iE`ro—uncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff _ _ reports, this Council specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 96 acres of-land. located a+. the northwest corner of Ctiwanda Avenue and 24th Street and is presently undeveloped land in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino County, Said pnperty is within the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of influence and is designated by the 8ereral Plan as Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). 17� �P ENT- DISTRIM AMENDMENT 88 -06 1988• (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated kesidential, County of -San Bernardino, (up to 2 dwelling tinits.per acre) and is undeveloped;'th. property-to the west.is'designated utility - easement, County of San Bernardino and is vacant; the property to the east is designated Residential (up to 2 dwelling units'per acre) and' is' undeveloped; and tie property to the south is'idthin the City of Rancho Cucamonga, designated Etiwando Specific Plan and is undeveloped. 3. Based upon the substantial ovidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced, meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the 96 acre property is suitable 'or a ouster planned residential development and is compatible with the existing General X Plan designation for the land use in the surrounding ares; and { (b) That the proposed development designation will not have a significant impart an the environment; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with =' the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units o1 per acre). 5 4. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the # Development District Amendment has been reviewed and considered in compliance z with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. i ' S. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Development District kaeneiment 88 -06 on the 13th day of July, 1988. /7gr-- ,J t`r ORDINANCE NO. 3utJ AN CALIFORNIA, EAPPROYINGIEmVIROiM6ML RANCH O CUCAMOHGA, OEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 88 -01 _ ASSESSMENT AND ANk"ATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF A g6 ACAEWE M PORTION SAN R 1` BERNM'�IND CWNTV UNINCORPORATED AREA LOCATED AT THE NORTHNE:T CORNER OF ETINANDA AVENUE MID 24TH STREET B:i*S P.. Recitals. (1) California Government, Code Section 65864 now provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "The Legislature finds and declares that: (a) The lack o iappo projects can result 1n a wasteofresources esca atetecost of housnnand tr developments to the consumer, and discourage investment in and cOmo;tment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. i (b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon - accordance of with project, the applicant my proceed with the project in conditions of approval, gwi llistrengthensthedPublicaplanning process. t to private particl¢ation in comprehensivo planning, and reduce he ewfc costs cf development. (11) California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: having a leg or equitable in eresttinarealoeiopertyafor thetdevetoa� person such Property as provldad in this article... development of follows: (iii) California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides as •A development agreement shall specify the duration of the use se a...0 eeme t� the Permitted uses of the property, the density of intensity of Incorporatedvhereinbyothis eferencenaisea pmroposedSDeveloit Development and concerning that property located at the northwest corner of Etlwanda Avenue W 24th Street. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, that agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "1• is referred to as 'the DevetOPment Agreement." 1�� No. 88 -01 1 20, e 2 (v) on June 22, 1908, the Planning co®tssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga anda oncluded noticed said hearing on that erntng the Development dste (vi) On July 13, 1980, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing concorning the Development Agreemont concluded said hearing on that date, and on that date considered the Planning Commission recommendation. (vit) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. S. O.r�dhion- aCnucceam onga; ttifforn4a; as-1oHa�r- d�" Cto • �" NOW, 1REFORE, * i rby a l d d H ty �&y of thfe 4 %Qo (" 1. 0 00, e In all respects as set forth in Recitals, Part A of this Ordinance. 2. in conjunction with the Development Agreement, an Initial Study and the requirements ofitheeCCaliforniasEnvironmentalnpual /tY Actlofc1970;'and this Council has determined that this appplication could not hhave a significant adverse effect on a the environment. hereby adopts a finding of no significant x' 3. This Council specifically finds that: n (a) The 96 acre property is suitable fora caster planned r residential development and is compatible with the existing Genera designation for the land use in the surrounding area; and c 'r (bl That the Development Agreement will not have a significant impact on the environment; and (c) That the Development Agreement is in conformance with the General Plan designation of Low Density Rsidential (2 -4 dwelling anites per` acre). 4. The City Council hercoy aeproves and ordains the Development Agreement attacheo hereto as Exhibit "1 . 7 P — J ME r; ,am 4 s` t n, �r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20. 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 8 FOR PARCEL MAP 9504, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HAVEN AVENUE TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the %ork in connection with Annexation No. 8 to Landzcape Maintenance District No. 4 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval 1s a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation Mo. 8 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 for Parcel Map 9504, located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. The developer of the subject parcel map has been notified of the public hearing by mxil The attached resolution alsn approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -387. Respectf submitted, RH A• Attachments [ l/ 4 w� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �^ Landscape Maintenance Engineer's p District No. 4 Annexation No. 8 fcr Parcel Mao 9504 Y. "sa SECTION 1. Authority for Report a This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Codc. State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). y^ SECTION 2. General Description k This City Council h4s elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 4. Tha City Council has determined that the areas to ?' be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Parcel Map 9504 as well ,- as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas All landscaped areas :p to be maintained In the annexed tracts are shorn on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho i Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram fir the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specificaticns for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs NO costs will be InCL-red for a improvements will be contt uctedbydevelope developers. Based ccnshistorical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (S.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will - be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District eo. 4 is comprised of landscaping of work Plan areas for all residential and non - residential (including vacant land) projects throughout the Terra Vista Planned Coriunity. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 including Annexation No. 8 is as follows: Existing Annex New District No_8 Total Landscape Area $204,709.00 0 $204,709.00 No. of D. U. 1,766 32 1,798 _ 183 F �ie� Per Lot Annual Assessment _$204,709.00 $113.85 1,798 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation Involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained "by an active homeowners association, these assessmrntt shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Otaaram A copy of the prosed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled .Exhibit A•, y this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within t op he text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of specific benefit to all properties (residential and non - residential) within the District in accordance with the following relationship: k Single - family residential projects: 1 dwelling unit • 1 assessment unit Multi - family residential projects: 1 dwelling unitt • 0.5 assessment unit Non - residential projects: 1.0 acre • 2.0 assessment units The City Council will hold a public ;iearing in June, to determine the actual assecaents based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events I. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets Public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and ` determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4 Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. OT s K 'a' .i - yy ■ Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 8 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4: *(Eastern half of median island on Haven Avenue from Base Line Road to Valencia Avenue previously annexed per Annexation No. 6) _ ysa <.•r. MAINTAINED AREA PROJECT —G UNIT 5— � APM 9504 pcl 1 .83 1.6 pcl 2 .48 1.0 pcl 3 2.64 5.3 pcl 4 .62 1.2 pcl 5 2.38 4.8 9cl 6 4.27 8.5 pcl 7 .91 1.8 pct 8 1.02 2.0 pcl 9 .64 1.2 pcl 10 .48 1.0 pci 11 _.87 1.7 TOTAL 15.95 32.0 *(Eastern half of median island on Haven Avenue from Base Line Road to Valencia Avenue previously annexed per Annexation No. 6) _ ysa <.•r. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 ANNEXATION NO.0 VAL— ENCt��yS� Z 4i TERRA VISTA VILLAGE T.K. !b0{ � J a < S BASE LINE ROAD ` si' "ow CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA fz ENGINEERING DIVISION ci 6 s VICINITY NIAP nn 1 ■ w — CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20; 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 17 FOR OR 87 -41 AND CUP 87 -42 (INDUSTRIAL /COMMERCIAL) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RECOAHENDATiON: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 17 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 17 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for OR 87 -41 and CUP 87 -42 (Industrial /Commercial). The developers Of the subject projects have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 68 -391. Respectfully itted, r Attachments - 1 4�-7 I ;a '.3 �w "SOLUTION NO. % --V 75' A AESMUTION OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL OF 7HE CITf OF AN RCNO COGMJIGA. CALIpORNIA. ORDERINS 28R WORK IN coNncriON NI78 AN,=ATTON NO. 17 TO STRLBT L107I30 VAINTCxaNQ DISTRICT NO. 6 4ND AC(BPTINO 87-43 M" Z)GDM Rf8 RMIT PDR DR _7-41 AND W? WHEREAS, the Ctty 'Cduncil of, the City 'of'Ra"6T C6c=cn9a did on the 15th day of June, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intertion No. 88 -392 to order the therein described work to connection with Annexation No. 17 to Street, Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -392 was duly and legally published to the time. forty and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed •Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -392, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by taw, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and d.,cumentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of - Rancho Cucamonga at the public interest and convenience requires the - annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 28 -392, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer 1s heraby finally approved; an-- SECTION 3. The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer s— AeorE —arm hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said trac s ave been occupied. J15717 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA ' Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 17 for DR 87 -41 and CUP 87 -42 SECTION 1. Authority for Report 6 This repnrt is to ceapliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City'Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. k Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the _ district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light 1 improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to ` all areas to the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map �- or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district Include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. O e P� r SECTION 4, Estimated Costs + No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment Purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated oniy, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street industrial ,Lcommerciali and nninstitutional projects throughout the l City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and Institutional areas derives the same benefi In residential zones. t as two assessment units The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No, 6 is shown below: I. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTO Mo 17 Total 58001. 47 0 47 9500L 5 0 5 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamp Size Total Lamps Rate MO's Total Annual taint. Cost SBOOL 47 X S 8.93 X 12 $5,036.52 95DOL 5 X $10.16 X 12 • 609.60 Total Annual Maint. Cost 55,646,60 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 453 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 • 7 Total Assessment Units 460 3. Cost per Assessment Unit. Total An Maintenance Cost $5 12 • 512.27 /year /unit No, of s n Oistr c Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained In Section 6. 1 �d .r i, oil 7 SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Clagrams are attached to this report and labeled 'Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 60, Annexation No. 17. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements isrr found t lna eall units within the District and that assessment shagg beequalfor each unit. When chits are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1, City Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Approval of City Engineer 'S Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year In May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. MI ^a� I "- Y ♦ - ♦ I �nM. � r EXHIBIT "A Properties end improvements to be included witfi nTAnnexation No.- 17 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: Asses, . No. of LwRs to be Annexed Pro ect Acreage nfE OR 87 -41 1.28 2.56 - -- ___ ___ ___ CUP 87 -42 2.27 4.54 TOTAL 3.55 7.10 _ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (, ANNEXATION NO. 17 s" ?M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONOA s/ .,_, • COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDIIN0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA — A N iin�' y F ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (o A!W —UTION NO. 17 C1TY OF RANCBO CUCAMONGA ('.UP s^37 -42 s } COUNTY OF SAN BBR MINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA N im i i 1 I I' of CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF' REPORT r DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell 11. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 21 FOR DR 87-41 AND CUP 87-42 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. 3 RECOMMENDATION: It Is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work In connection with Annexation No. 21 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 21 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for DR 87-41 and CUP 87-42 (Commercial/Industrial). The developers of the subject projects have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached -esolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-389. Respectf y—s P bmitted, All RHM.JA�. Attachments I MOLUTION W. ?Cer -1 74 A RESCLMON OP 78E CITY COUNCIL OP 788 CITr OF RANCHO CiC1iONCA, CALIFORNIA. ORMVMc ME WORE IN cONNECITOR NI7N AKNMTION N0. 21 To LANDSCAPE "AIRIENANQ'DI87RICT NO. 3 An ACQPr=g 'AE n- NAL EF DMM'6 REPORT 2olt DE 87-41 AND CUP 87-42 CUP of -4c WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 15th Jay of June, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -392 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 21 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -392 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement ", was duly and legally posted in the time, form manner, location, and nvaber as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the rity Clerk; aid WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described 14. said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -392, according to the names and addres<t% of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City-of - Rancho Cuc&-n-o-n-g-a-Ehat the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -392, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer i s FWre6y finally approved, and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessmen n e ngineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be tt finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin untTT_afEe—r 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. CITY OF RANCHO (,UCAMANGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation Ho. 21 for OR 87 -41 anti CUP 87 -42 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is In compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This MalntenancetDistrictiNo. 3. ThedCity Councillhaswdetermined into maintained will have an effect upon all the develoments es mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained In the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated In the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median Improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or /by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it Is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal th'rty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated Into two zones. Zone 1 Is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet The district was formed in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance landscaping willabenassessednonoperalot storm theimaintenanceecnstsewithinh the project boundary only as stipulated to the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. /�7 7 "t Zone 2 is comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or wilt be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone�2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to -Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard•and 4th Street from west to exit City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to - Rochester Avenue and median islands on other mAjor divided highways and some parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 21 is as follows. Zone 11 Total estimated maintenance cost Assessment units Total cost - assessment unit for year and month Zone 2 Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. Assessment units, acres Total cost t assessment Existing District $2,070 8 $2,08 70 • $258.75 /year or $21.56 /mo. /lot Existing Annexation New District No. 21 Total 0 0 0 380,639 3.55 380,643 unit for year and month 0 x S.30 • S 0 /year 0 /mo. /acre Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the y attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled •Exhibit A ", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. /(70 :. ey I e SECTION 6..A!sessm6t Iagrovements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel for Zone I and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or parcel in - Zane 2. The City actual assessments ibased lUpon dthe pactual hcosts 9incurred�by ,thetCitynduring the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as-required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 19 ?2. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Approval of City Engineers Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hea ring date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. r .// G Properties and improvements- to be included within Annexation No. 21 (Zone 2) to Landscape, Majntefiance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE DR 87-41 1:28 CUP 8.7-42 2.27 TOTAL 3.55 IMPROVEMENT AREAS Tn BE ANNEXED IN ANMEUTION NO. 21 r= Area Haven Avenue 0 000th111 Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 r= f, r! ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION N0. 21 `` °'o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAINIONCA w MEE E...;INEERING DIVISION ' T cblAP 1 \,VI I y 0 a{ s w }3 3� I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION NO.2I Cl'" OF RANCHO CUCA,NIOiNG.A w GUPBZAZ O/� ENGINEERING DIVISION ��n Y VICINM MAP N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide S M SUBJECT: Ordering the Oeannexation of Tract Nos, 12402, 12365, 12672 and 12673 Mork Program Areas ( Terra Vista Planned Community) from Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 RECO MDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the deannexing of the work program areas on the above described tracts from Landscape Maintenance District No. 4. Background /Analysis Parkways and trails constructed per conditions for Tracts Nos. 12402, 12365, 12672 and 12673 are presently being maintained by the property owners. Per a resolution adopted by Council on May 18, 1988, modifying and clarifying policies pertaining to the methodology of Landscape maintenance apartments noilonger be maintained lbyhthe District. Thereforey attached Tract Council 165, approval 2672 resolution program areas (e arkways and trails only) from Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community). The developer of the subject tracts has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The areas to be deannexed are: Project Parkways and Trails ` Tract 12402 Terra Vista Parkway 11,278 Spruce Avenue 4.900 16,178 Tract 12365 12,250 sq. ft. Terra Vista Parkway Spruce Avenue Mountain View Drive 0 I Resp su fitted, *, :sd- .i Attachment N� ,0 AFf'REPORT - CITY COUNCIL 5 JULY 20, 1988 PAGE 2 P_olect Parkways and Trails Tract 12672 Terra Ytsta'Parkway 4,004 Spruce Avenue 4.501 8,505 Tract 12673 Terra Vista Parkway 4,420 Church Street 4,163 Elm Avenue 5,550 2,849 10.360 27,342 Resp su fitted, *, :sd- .i Attachment N� ,0 Et m; DEANNEXATION FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4 ... o,,.Ground and Tree Maintenance LOT LOT 0 c� m G LOT 1 LOT f m 0 0 N LOT 2 packv+aY vista Sacco c; (C ) "F CITY OF RANCID CMANIONGA ' T 1\7� ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP i %•. i� X� 4� at DEANNEXATION FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. -+ GROUND AND TREE MAINTENANCE wed' W �3 �V (j �/_ LOT 1 OF P.M. 8842 TRACT 12365 AL U U AIN CITY OF RANCHO CUCA11,10.'VCA L; y ENGINEERING DIVISION on T lS� VICINITY MAP 1\,II n EVA 0 DEANNEXATION FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ND. 4* ,00 � t�/S,� ]!ENGINEERING TY OF RANCHO CUCA4-vnNGA LJS DIVISION inn VICINITY MAP N Ra"LUTLON NO- W 17 7 7 A RESOLUTION or 7811 CM Offt= OF Me a1T 08 RANOBo WrA)DWA. GLIEO►JifA. ORMUNG 78R +.. Df< wx=TION OE WORK PROOMN ANPLs of TIM No3. 12404. 12365.rno. 12673 non LANngarg yAIN7t- 16SOa DI37RI�CI 110. WHEREAS, Tract Nas. 12402, 12365, 12672and 12673 titre annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Comunity)-by the Formation, Annexation Ros. 1, 2 and 3, respectively; and WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution.No. 88 -336 has determined that those areas that would not otherwise be maintained by the District be maintained by the abutting property owner; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga deems it necessary to deannex the abutting parkways and trails for Tract Nos. 12402 12365. 12672 and 12673 from the work program areas of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4; and WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 15th day of June 1988, adopt Its Resolution of Approval No. 88 -386 to deannex the ticerein described work and said resolution was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said resolution on file in the Office of the City Clerk. NOW, THEREFORk, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: SECTION 1: That those work program areas for the parkways and trails abu t ng ract Nos. 12:02, 12365, 12672 and 12673 be deannexed from Landscape Maintenance District No. 4. Mr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 20, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE UPDATE I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review the Propos po cy revisions to the Tree Preservation Ordinance to allow staff to prepare a formal Ordinance amendment. It. DISCUSSION: In response to Council discussion on May 18, 1988, s as prepared a summary of the various policies as they could be applied to revisions to the current Tree Preservation Ordinance. The areas of concern expressed by the Council are discussed below, including Cie present Ordinance requirement and proposed revisions to the Ordinance. A. Existing Blue Cum Windrows in New Develepeent Projects: current Polic • In new develorment projects, existing windrows are exam ne with regard to health and general location with respect to project design. Whenever appropriate and feasible, the trees are preserved. In the case of disease or conflict with public improvements or other site design constraints, they are replaced with Spotted Gum Eucalyptus to re- establish the windrow grid pattern in more appropriate locations elserhere in the project. Pro osed Polit : All Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees should be replaced otted Gums or other species, unless they can be protected within a public right -of -way or other public easement. The replacement pattern should re- establish the original windrow grid pattern. This policy would allow replacement of the Blue Gum Eucalyptus in most new development projects. The replacement xould occur in the most appropriate locations on and off -site, but the replacement species is far more suited to a residential environment without the messy characteristics of the older Blue Gums. Under certain circumstances, the Blue Gum could be preserved within areas of public right -of =way (such es Community Trails) tf it was determined that such preservation would be a bene7lt to the area and the condition of the trees would warrant preservation. RT ORD. UPDATE 20, 2 B. Removal of Blue Gums Within Private Yard Areas: Current nePolased onlcondition ofdtheltrpeestin questionand the effect of the removal on the area, with emphasis nn preservation. Pro osed Po11c Give greater nexibiliC to tree removal w n rears a yard areas of private yards. Considerations would include lot size, character of the neighborhood, and ability to relocate/replacc trees elsewhere on the lot. Replacement of the Blue Gums with more appropriate trees would be encouraged where feasible. The proposed change in policy would provide additional considerations when reviewing tree removal within a private yard area. The intent of the revision would be to allow greater flexibility to homeowners in utilizing the areas where wiidrows have been preserved or replaced. A Tree Removal Permit would still be required. C. Preserving Blue Gums in Key Areas: Council ski want to ns an optio co er n or presery ng ist exing Blue Gums in limited ppattern. Thisipolicy is being t being used in theEtiwan A I ecific Plan ares along Etiwanda Avenue, Victoria and other imited locations. Examples of such k;y areas elsewher-3 include d Monte Vista near Archibald near Hillside an Hermosa /Hillside. Other key areas could be deteiwined and accurately defined within the forstal amendment to the Tree Preservation Ordinance. D. Preservation of Other Herita eca ore, PiAlland other heritage frees, nc u ng a m, actively preserved In accordance with the Tree Preservation t preservation of these other heritage t policies cesnot be amende to _ d.. III. SL"Wy: The intent of i ay 1$, 1988 City Co amendment/ to the Tree encourage AY further dis Pali es cur•ently under RRspe �cji ly su ;tied, Brad BullerR City Planner BB:OM:ko this report is to summarize discussion from unPreseervation prior to formal cussions that could clarify, or add to the consideration. i OUTLINE OF OFFERS MOE BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND THEIR RESPONSE TO THE OFFERS January 8, 1987 Agency identifies Board's desire to develop an educational program /project which had mutual benefit opportunities. No dollar amount discussed. March 5, 1987 Agency offers mutual benefit types of projects such as a joint sports facility or library (with audio and computer lab lookups to each school campus within City) or central stores facility. No dollar amount was discussed. March 16, 1987 Agency staff offered 3% of 34% for 20 years. Agency outlined that the money was to be used for building school facilities first and then for capital outlay. Money was nut to be used outside of the City and could not be used for administrative purposes. Districts responded with a counter offer of 75% of 345. Agency informed the superintendents that this was unacceptable but would report it to the Board. May 5, 1987 Agency proposed a joint library facility totaling approximately $10 million which would have computer and educational links to all school campuses within the City limits. In addition the superintendents were offered $10 million to be used in a revolving fund for school construction over the first 20 -year period of the Plan Amendment. May 21, 1987 Agency staff offered a percentage formula (based on the Agency's portion) of 2% for the first 5 years, 51 for the next 15 years and 2% for the remaining 20 years of the Plan Amendment. Agency staff calculated that using conservative growth measures there would ar.:rue approximately $28 million to the five school districts. The Agency indicated that the percentage formula did•not- Inclue? any monies being used for a community benefit project nor was the amount generated by the fomula to have a maximum dollar amount cap. The money would be placed in a revolving fund, thus when funds are received by the State they would be deposited into the account as well. Districts' representatives informed Agency staff they were not authorized to respond with a counter offer because of lack of concensus among the five districts. Joint discussions were considered terminated by districts and Agency because of this. Agency requested impact information. -1- June 2, 1987 Agency met with Carleton offered a percentage of within the Project Area. respond. Lightfoot of the Etiwanda School District. Agency the t rleton formula indicated based he on was' I of the district able to formally June 5, 1987 Aenc indivi dual fnegotl negotiations. At this meeting Agency lstaff offered lthe Initiate districta growthtrates of the district which overlapssthe Project Area.o based on annual it wouldabeenecessary stating another meeting so that be Clayton uld berpresent to discuss the matter. June 5, 1987 Agency staff met with Chaffey High School District. Mike Dirksen indicated Agency would ds.liThey outlined projecatstsuchsasot nnisocourts,oswomingtPools and $10 million ibes d reserved from gencyfundsr high for these types community benefit projects. Agency requested that theyouttine their priority mutual benefit projects along with cost estimates because $10 million was too high when interest payments were taken Into account. June B. 1987 Agency staff. Agency consultant and Agency counsel met with Central School District Superintendent and Central counsel. Mr. Clayton Parker. Agency outlined offer of a Project agge eof teh 2 -5 -2 formula based on growth of the District within the noty to takec legal noaction ti if thnegotiate Agency impact anted half ofi u the tax increment attributable to the District. June 9, 1987 Agency staff met with Alta Loma school District. They indicated a mutual benefit project is something they would be interested in. Three were discussed: 1) air conditioning the Alta Loma elementary facility; 2) computer -2- lab for the proposed Groves s0ool site; 3) the administration office to be located on Beryl Avenue. Agency staff indicated that the administration offices would not be considered ` a mutual benefit project. Agency staff did feel that the other two projects would be very positive for both groups. The District requested that the Agency contribute $375,000 by FY 88/89 towards one of the two,projects. June 9, 1987 Agency staff met with John Costello representing the Cucamonga School District. Agency staff offered a percentage of teh 2 -5 -2 formula based on growth of population within the Project Area. Hr. Costello requested the Agency provide 50% of tax increment attributable to the district. June 10, 1987 Staff contacted both the Chaffey and Alta Loam districts and explained that HOU's rrould he prepared for the June 15, 1987 School Board meetings and the ' June 17, 1987 Agency meeting. The Agency would contribute $375,000 for Alta Lama's mutual benefit projects and $3,475,000 for Chaffey projects, In -7 '^ addition, Chaffey would have priority use of the proposed theater /auditorium which has been proposed for the Central Park. Both Chaffey and Alta Loma • accepted mitigation offers. ' June 12, 1987 Agency staff contacted John Costello and informed him that the Board did not accept the districts' counter of 50% of the increment. Agency staff counter offered with a percentage of $24 million (difference between mitigation report and what was allocated to Alta Loma and Chaffey) to the District based on school population growth within the Project Area. Agency also indicated that consideration rruuld be given to children transferring into district boundaries because of parents place of employment Agency requested impact information. June 12, 1987 Agency contacted Frank Cosca and informed him that counter offer was rejected by the Board. Agency offered a percentage of $24 million to the District. Percentage would be dependent on growth of the district within the Project Area. Agency requested impact information. -3- r rT =, t June 12, 1987 T Staff again attempted oc Carleton 9 e 1 him isstaff o icatedhe would not available a til June 16. 1987. Agency requested impact information. r August 6, 1987 E1'= REPORT Tn COUNCIL - MITIGATION TO DISTRICTS ' Chaffey $13,667,959 Alta Loma $ 930,738 Y Central $ 2,549,074 Cucamonga $ 485,213 Etiwanda $ 9,702.884 Since no impact or mitigation information was received and no fiscal review and Agency consultant prepared a committee mitigation report was submitted, Agency staff study using residential density and growth potential of each for district within the Project Area. Factors were also taken into account Based construction costs of Mickert's indlstrial /commercial job transfers. on report and offsetting with revenues from school funds. Greene fees, and other revenues identified by district consultants, a shortfall of $27,335,919 was of each teach Area, iAgency identified appropriate amounts of mitigation due district. C, led a meeting with Etiwanda , Cucamonga, Central aistricts and attorneys to '.r, finding again a solution to mitigation. The Agency said it would fully discusse mitigation n but and would Attorneys respond to request for want for impacts discussion. Agency received a 'wish list' for next 40 years triple that of the former study by the dlstri,:t consultant. — - February 16, 1988 Received a letter from Central 3oard President asking to consider Santa Ana's to thisoapproach and indicated williogne s9 to doesame�c No response se bysdistricts. -4- Alta Loma School District 93$0•F t»allne toad • Port OMe, aea 370 a Alta tome Califorola 91701 a 7141/997.07K a .. c.7yOR taw • _ ••) IMM"erlet EstabllrMd 1!!s on .... Jul,., 12, 1988 16% A tostnw pr- rt aoaotr X TAnraw. iom t tvwearay - Mr. Lauren Wasserman City Manager City of Rancho Cucanwnga i P. O. Box 80 ;' Rancho Cuc,monda CA 91730 Dear Lauren, lVJ 4, I have been notified that the City Cuuncli will take up the District's request for a Condi- tional Use Permit on July 20, 1988. The Alta Loma School District is still reviewing alter- nate sites for our district offices and, therefore, regmst a 90-dry continuance on this matter. Thank yoj. 5 ncerel• /, / John E. McMurtry " Superintendent t.: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner JEM /cdm r ysown eras A. EHF= SrACV hUSetl CITY OF RA=10 CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE& July 19, 1988 TO: City Council /l+• PPONe Parla J. Wright, wane ilaaeber t L� SUBJECri CONSIDERATION OF TREE PRESERVATION ORDINAUCE The Tree Preservation Ordinance is scheduled for Council review oe Nadnesday, July 20, 1968. I will be unable to attend the City Council meting because of a previously scheduled 3aetinE for city officials in Northern California. I request that he Tree Preservation Ordinance discussion be continued to August 3, 1988, so that I will be able to participate in the discussion. Thank you for your courtesy. PJN:jls 88-488 I