HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/08/17 - Agenda Packet - RDACITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT,
AGENCY
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETINGS
15t and 3rd Wednesdays — 7:00 P•m•
August 17, 1989
Long Park 61 Base line Community
Ro d Ater
Rancho Cucamonga
Agency Dfembers
Dennis L Stout, cb* em.•
Pamela J. Weight, v"ch,eiAO•
Deboran N Brown, Am M-'w'
Charles J. Buquet, AP"r MMW
Jeffrey King, q,.o u,.e.r
•e•
Lauren M. Wasserman. rsuPh,mrt+.rn,a,�r
ctry offlm 989 -1851
Lfoas Park 9804145
%3
v
PAGE -
Redevelopment Agency Agenda
August 17, 1988 1
K5.
A. CALL ifl ORDER �.
r 1. Roll Call: Brow __, Huquet , Stout
King _, mad Aright
5;
Y B. CONSENT CALENDAR
h
The following Consent Calendae items are expected to be
routine and noo- eontroverstal. Thsy will be acted upon by
the RDA at one time without discussion. Any its* my be
removed by an Ageeeymeabot or member of the audience for
discussion.
1. Approval to designate the Deputy Executive Director to
process of one a nt to the substitution
subcontractors pursuant to the Public contract code.
RESOLUTION N0. RA 88 -005
A RESOLUTI•:N OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RRDEVELOMNT AGENCY, AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DlggCrOR
TO PROCESS AND, IF APPROPRIATE, CONSENT
TO THE SUBSTITUTION Or SUBCONTRACTORS
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CODE
Cy POHLIC HEARINGS
I No items submitted. 1) STAMP RRPons
No items submitted.
a. COMMUKICATIONS PROM YES PUBLIC
This is the time ad place for the general Public to address
the Redevelopment Agoucy. State law prohibits the - -
Redevelopment Agency from addressing any issue not
previously included on the Agenda. The Redevelopment Agency
meeting. receive �cnimn re and set the to be limited itto five minutes subsequent
individual.
P. AWOUR®@NT
��y.•✓
� - cry...: �..�,.
,`t'`aT.
V
-d
PAGE
�sfr
City Council Agenda
�:.
August 17, 1988
1
L}
AD➢6HDON
City Council Aaend•
August 17, 1988 — 700 o.v.
N'
-
Lions Park Co®uaity Center
+,
9161 Base Line Head
i
Reecho Cuuaaogap California
i
The following consent eale¢dar item is to be added to the
ri
agenda for the August 17, 1988 City Council meeting.
1 Approval to designate the Assistant City Manager to
process and eo¢ss¢C to the substitution of
subcontractors pursuant to the public contract code.
8890L8fI0N N0. 88 -519
A RESOLUTION 01 OP 288 CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HANC80 COCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA
AUS't10HI2WU' AND DIAECTWC THE ASSISIAM
CITY MANAGER TO P @OGB88 AND. IP
APPBOPAIAIB, CONF',HM TO THE SOBSTI'ILTION
OF BDBCONTHACTOB6 POfl80ANT TO THE
CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CODE
-
CITY OF RANCHO C
REDEVELOPMENT
STAFF REPORT y
4
DATE: August 17, 1988
TO: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT: DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR
SUBSTITUTION OF SUBCONTRACTORS ON PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency approve the
eso ut on granting authority to the Deputy Executive Director to approve
substitution of subcontractors in accordance with the California Public
Contract Code.
ANALYSIS: The public contract code provides specific authority for
su- 6stTtution of subcontractors pursuant to the Subletting and Subcontracting
Fair Practices Act, California Public Contract Code Sections 4100, at seq.
The law requires that the substitution must be approved, in advance, by the
awarding authority (Redevelopment Agency; or a 'duly authorized officer%
In the last five years, there have been very few requests for substitution of
subcontractors; however, due to the present lack of delegation of authority,
all such requests must be approved by the Redevelopment Agency. We have
recently encountered a situation in which a subcontractor either desires to be
relieved of its subcontract or 1s unable to perform the subcontract.
Unfortunately, due to the present status of the substitution procedure, we
must prepare the matter for a Redevelopment Agency agenda which may extend the
contract performance schedule for a period of three to four weeks, thereby
delaying our project. In order to provide a more rapid 'turn around' for
requests for substitution of subcontractors, it would appear appropriate .f9r
the Redevelopment Agency to delegate the authority to approve substitutions to
the Deputy Executive Director. This would shorten the timeline for approval
of such substitutions to, approximately, ten days.
Moreover, the requirements of the Public Contract Code with respect to
approval of a substitution of a subcontractor is rather straightforward and
authorizes such substitution only in certain circumstances. Those
circumstances Include such matters as failure of the subcontractor to execute
a
k.
REDEVELOPHEHTlAnEHCYA0EN0A�5
August 17,•1988
Page 2
a contract, bankruptcy of the }subcontractor, inability to perform the
subcontract or inability to meet, bond requirements, clerical error in, the
listing of the subcontractor, a subcontractor not being licensed as required
by the Contractor's License.Law or, unsatisfactory performance or delay by the
subcontractor. Accordingly, we,-believe that the substitution process :is,?
essentially, a - ministerial .one- not ' necessarily requiring thoroughgoira
analysis by the Redevelopment Agency. Stated otherwise, when specified facts
are given and the s:,bcontractor,'is unable to refute them or wishes to agree to
the substitution, the.,matter may be accomplished in relatively short order.
However, requiring the processing of such requests through the Redevelopment'
Agency results in delay in,the process thereby creating problems in the field.
�t
Respectfully submitted,
" \ t
V
Jatk Lam, AICP
Deputy Executive Director
•1L/ kap
I rAttachments: Resolution
..�Y.. Yw
i
RESOLUTION N0._I?A_0 - QG'!�'
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA RF.DEMOPMENT AGENCY
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO PROCESS
AND. IF APPROPRIATE.CONSENT TO THE SUBSTITUTION OF SUBCONTRACTORS
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC CONTRArT CODE.
(i) California Public Contract Code Section 40!7 provides, in
pertinent part, that no prime contractor whose bid is accepted may substitate
any person as a subcontractor in puce of subcontractors listed in the
original bid except upon consent of the awarding authority or a duty
authorized officer of the city.
(ii) California Public Contract Code Sections 4100, et seq., provide
specific parameters for determining the propriety of permitting the
substitution of subcontractors on public, works projects.
(111) The Redevelotment Agency desires to provide a more timely method
of resolving subcontractor substitution requests in order to insure that
public projects are completed on a timely basis.
prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancno Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, does hereby
find, determine and resolve as fellows:
Resolution. 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this
2 Pursuant to the provisions of California Public Contract Code
Section 4107 the City Council hereby designates the Deputy Executive Director
of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency as the 'duly authorized officer•
to act on behalf of the Agency with respect to any requests for con ;ent to
substitution of subcontractors an public works projects.
3. The Deputy Executive Director shall, in considering requests for
substitution 3f subcontractors, comply with all requirements of the California
Public Contract Code with respect to substitution of subcontractors.
The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
ADOPTED and APPROVED this day of , 1988.
Chairman —
I. Lauren Wasserman, Secretary to thu Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Agency, City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency held on the day of 1988, and was