Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988/10/05 - Agenda Packety�fr CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS lst and 3rd Wednesdays — 7:30 p.m. October 3, 1988 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga City Councllmembers Dennis I.. Stout, Maur Pamela J. Wright, Maywpa-Yaw Deborah N. Brown, c"wawexb r Charles J. Buquet, eawetl.,mb" Jeffrey icing, eauadi e.De, ♦0• Lauren M. Wasserman, cyMa.aro James Markman, ey,l,w ,y Beverly A. AuthelcL cy ck,* tY ® � efty 718ee: 989 1831 IJom Cut 980 -7145 f W r .I 1 M1i i PAGE `;'f:'r w:�. ., a AgendnYtc City Council 4 AYWO October S, 1988 Il FS .1r All it -•. aabmltied for the City Cowed Agenda must be is L writing. She deadline for aabaSetiag these items is 5100 4'. p.f. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. She City qy Clark's Office receives all ouch ileac. A. CALL TO 0806Y z 1. Pledge of Allagiwce to PIsO. sa 2. 8011 Calls blow Huque: , Stout Ling , and Wright Nrigtt Il� 3. A�OCt1C8MIR8/PlL98BfATIOHB { c. aessar cALHHnAn ` She Following Co¢seat Calendar item are aapeeted to be C -4285 -7043. routine and eon- eontrovenial. They will be acted ap0o by 1 the Council at one aim asitawt discussion. Any item sty be removed by a Comeilrmber or aanhar of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Hinutess August 17, 1998 August 31, 1998 September 21, 1988 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/21/89 and 9/28/88, 1 and Payroll ending 9/15/88 for the total amount. of 9918,623.70. 3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule 11 as of September 30, 1988. 4. Approval to continue appropriations from PY 87 -89 to PY 12 88-89, and appropriate the fundr. Co the account as outlined. 5. Approval to award the design contract for drainage 13 impraveneate at Bed dill Park Lake and Amphitheater to Linville Civil Sngin¢ars /Lead Surveyors, Inc., of Rancho Cucamonga, in the amount of 914,800 plus a lOS contingency, to be fundrd from Capital Reserve Account No. 25 iR. Vl H -4285 -7043. _ as City Council Agenda ` October 5, 1988 PAGE Ky, 2 � ^L�• 6. Approval to etecute Contract Change Order No. 1 (00 87- 14 193) for a Professional 9ervires Agreement with BSI Consultants to provide additional services in preparingr striping and signing plans, handicap ramps, drivevayn, drainage, specifications and estimates for 19t1h Street from Jasper to Carnelian. The Change Order is for they total amount of $160820 to bring the contract total to $44,320 be paid from Systems Development Punda, Account 22- 4637 -8743. 7. Approval .� ,mrcbase a FHC Vanguard 4000 Street Sweeper 16 from tern Equipment Company of Pomona, California in the Ei amount of $111,231.10 to be paid in five annual payment• not to "cued $26,000 to be funded by Coa Tax - Account No. 09 -4637 -7045. S. Approval to award and execute Professional Services 18 ' Agreement (CO 88 -160) betver. the City of Rancho Cucamonga and QoS Consulting Civil Engineers for the preparation of an Economic Study as well as Design Plans, Contract Specifications sod Boginear's Estimates on the Cucamonga Creek Storm Drain Improvement., Phase 2 starting from approximately 1400 feet east of the Cucamonga Creek Channel to east of Hello Avenue. The per diem not to azceed fee of $35,506 will be funded by the drainage fund, Account No. 23 -0637 -8860. 9. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -161) for the 19 Etivanda I and II Street Rebsbilitation Improvemeut Project - Pecan Avenue and Catalpa Street awarded to Laird Qonetruction Company, Inc. for the amount of 4182,600 0165,992.86 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Gas Tax Fund Account Nos. 09- 4637-8702 and 09 -4637- 8703. 10. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -162) for the 20 Archibald Avenue Widening Improvement Project from Highland Avenue to Lamm Avenue awarded to Bob Britton, Incorporated for the amount of $137,500 ($124,925.15 102 contingency) to be funded from System Development Fund, Account No. 22 -0637 -6755. ll. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -163) for the Via 21 Carrillo Drive Improvement Project from Avenida Vejar to East of Sierra Madre Avenues awarded to Laird Construction Company, Incorporated for the amount of $193,000 ($175,114.71 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Grants C.D.B.G., Account Ho. 20- 4333.8704. : r .t . - -.,.. PAGE City Council Agenda October 5, 1988 1 3 12. Approval to execute contract (00 88 -164) for the Hallman 22 Avenue Storm Drain Improvement Project from Monte Vista Stroet to the Southern Pacific Railroad and Cucamonga Storm Drain awarded to Steve Bubalo Construction Company for the amount of $1,248,000 ($1,188,225.25 plus 5% contingency) to be funded from Drainage facilities Fund, Account No. 23- 4637 -8626. 13. Approval to execute contract (CO 85 -165) for tho Tryon 23 Street Sidewalks Improvement Project vest of Archibald Avenue including Alternate "A" east side of Jadaite Avenue avarded to B -1 Enterprise Corporation for the amount of $27,101.76 to be funded from Pedestrian Grant& /Article 3, Account No, 15637 -8717, 14. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -166) for the 24 Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Highland Avenue and Archibald Avenue Improvement Project awarded to Hovey glectric, Incorporated, for the amount of $71,800 ($65,260 plus 102 contingency) to be funded from TDA /Article 8, Account No. 12- 4637 -8824. 15. Approval of Parcel Map 11106, located vent of genyon Way 25 and South of Victoria Pcrk Lanes submitted by The William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION M0. 88 -588 27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING THE PARCEL MAY NO. 11106 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 11106) 16. Approval of Parcel Map 10295, mouth of Mountain View 29 Drive, between Spruce and Milliken Avenuess aubmitted by Levis Development Cempaoy. RESOLUIION NO. 88 -589 I 30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF BADCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10295 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 10295) 17. Approval of Parcel Map 11105 located at the southeast I 32 corner of Kenyon Way and Woodruff Place submitted by The William Lyon Company. 1, ti PACE City Council Agenda October 5, 1988 1 4 a, 33 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -590 •� A RB90LOTIOH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE k' ;�. CITY OY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, .� APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11105 y, (TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO. 11105) ; x!^ 35 18. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and ry s Improvement Security for 6891 Amethyst Street, submitted by Larry Matbes. �. 36 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -591 e A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE r '. CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ^} APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, g Y IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 6891 AMETHYST STREET 19. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and 38 Annexation to Improvement 8eeud.ty and Ordering the Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance I and 6 for cup 87-16, icorner•o at the southeast Hellman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Nu West CompoF- • RESOLUTION NO. 88 -592 39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPEOVEKeN1' SECURITY FOR CUP 87 -16 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -593 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CI17 COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT $0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 87 -16 20. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 43 Trot 10349, located on the vast side of Sapphire Street south of Jennet Street, submitted by Walton Construction Corporation. , •i4 f ` City Council Agenda October 5, 1988 PAGE 5 `� `Rzsouna MO. 88 -594 44 A RESOLUTION OF T86 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10349 '4 21. Approval of Mkp, execution of Improvement Agr,emmat and 45 Improvamaat Security and Ordering the Annexation to Lighting Landscapo District No. 3 and Street and Maintenance District Moe. 1 and 6 for CUP 0-260 located be northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill o Boulevard, submitted by OAS Investors. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -595 46 s A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE C!.TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 87 -26 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -596 47 A BE • XTION OF TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERING TILE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING % INrBNANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 87 -26 22. Approval of Map, execution of Agreement (CO 88 -I67) for 50 Postponement of Recordation of Covencnu, Conditions and Restrictions, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District go. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 for Tract 12659 -1, located on the southvest corner of Etivanda Avenue and Tventy-Fourth Street, submitted by The Walton Associated Company. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -597 52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT OF C.C. 4 R.'S, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPBDVEMENr SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 12659 -1 n. PAGE City Council Agan" October 5, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -598 I 53 A RESOLUTION 1 OF THE CITY COVC:7L OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TEE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN R TO LANDSCAPE DISTRICT NO.1 AND LIGHTING NAIUNTZHAFCE DISTRICT HOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT NO- 12659-1 23. Approval to accept the Arrov Route, Phase I from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, (CO SS-031) inas complete, release bonds and ut authorize approve City E gfinal to file t "No ties of Camp contract amount of 8286,878.59. RESOLUTION 00. 88 -599 A RESOLUTION OF To CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCANONGA, CALIFORNIFA, OR ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVENEHTS ARROW ROUTE, PHASE I FRON ARCHIBALL AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE GO 88 -031 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TIM WORK 24. Approval to accept the Carnelian street Traffic Signals at the inter, o£ Red Hill Country Club Drive and Vineyard Avenue, (CO 87 -217) as comPlrteo release bonds and autboriaa the City Engineer to Pile a "Notice of Completion" aad approve the final contract amount of 1146,387.85. RESOLUTION NO. 68-600 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COOMCCAYLLIYORNTUAE CITY OF RANCHO CGCANONGA, ACCZpTING THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS D AND C SAFETY V F IGHTING AT TEE INTERSECTIONS OF CARNELIAN STREET AT BUD HILL COUNTRY CLOD DRIVE AND CARNELIAN STREET AT VTNEYA2D AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 56 57 58 59 PACE City council Agenda October 5, 1988 7 25. Approval to accepe Improvements, release Maintenance 60 Cuarantae Bond for tract 10046 located on the north side of Hillside Road east of Archibald Avenue. Maintenance Cuarantaa Bond (Street) $24,700 26. Approval to ccrept Improvesbnts, release bonds and file a Notice of Coapletion fore DR 87 -22 located at 9345 Santa Anita Avenue 61 Faitbful Performance Bond Minor) $100,200 RESOLUTION NO. 88-401 62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SHE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 87 -22 AND AUTHORIZING THE IILINC Or A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DR 86 -33 located on the north side of Civic Center Drive 63 east of Ot a Avenue Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 9 4,400 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -602 64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 86 -33 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Tract 11853 located on the northeast corner of 19th 65 Street and Ramona Avenue Release: Faitbful Performance Bond (Street) $ 42,500 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 0 4,250 T I PAGE City Co -I' Agenda I 8 Oct o ,c Ss 1988 66 RESOLUTION No. 88 -603 A RSSOLUTION OF TOE CITY COUNCIL OF THE _ CITY Op RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 70R TRACT 11853 AND AUTHORIZING TOM PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Church 67 Tract 12365 oEf -Ate im roveeenu leeated oa Avenue Street and Yerr+k VOs to Perkva betreen Haven and truce Avenue Releaser Faithful performance Bond (Street) 6421,840 Accepts Naintouanee Guarantee Bond (Street) 6 42,184 68 RESOLUTION N0. 88-604 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE .^.TTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TRACT 112365 nFF SITE IIMPROVHYSATS FOR AUTHORIZING TIM PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 27. Approval of the Environmental Initial Stuart Parts I and 69 II for the proposed Alta Lama Storm Drain, Reach IB, em Watershed A Avenue andissuance of a Negative Detlentior. therefor.a 70 RESOLUTION NO. 88-605 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ;OCANOHGA, CALIFORNIA, AppEDVING ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUANCE OF AA NEGATIVS DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED ALTA LOH& STORM DRAIN, REACH 18, WATERSHED AREA V 28. Approval of the 61 ,ironmental Initial ufor P rtslIYer 81 II, for the proposed Slurry B ram 1988 -89 for various r'ty streets and approval of a Categorical Bremption therefore. �A POOH, City Council Agenda October 5, 1988 9 ' I HESOLUIION N0. 68-606 82 A RESOLUTION Op- -+THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNLA, p APPR0VING'THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM 101 FISCAL YEAR 1988 -89 FOR VARIOUS CITY5 STREETS '. 29. Approval to increase CtafFie signal maintenance rates by 95 � 52 due to caange in Consumer Price Ind" as provided for in currant maintenance agreement vith Computer service Company to be funded Pram Gas Taz, Account No. 09 -4637- 6028, Contract Services. 30. Approval to enter into aacrov proceedings for 99 acquisition of the future North East Community Park site. 31. Approval of a Vol! r. naming of park and recreation 101 facilities. 32. Approval tt authorize the advertising Of "Notice 103 Teviting Bids" for the Amethyst Street Reconstruction, Drain and Traffic Signal Project at 19tb Street, Storm to be funded from the Systems Development Pond, Account No. 22- 4637 -8747, and Transportation Development Act, Account No. 12- 4637 -8606. 104 RESOLUTION N0. 88-607 A RESOLUTION OF THE CI11: COUNCIL CF THE CITY 09 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PIAVE AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR 'CHE AMETHYST STREET RECONSTRUCTION, STORM DRAIN AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 33. Set public hearing for November 2, 1988 - Approval to 109 vacate a portion of San Diego Avenue between Foothill I Boulevard and north of San Bernardino Road. i I PAGE`, City Coup, ! Agenda October 5, 1958 30 RE80LUrION NO. 88-600 I 110 A RESOLUTION OF TER ,T COUNCIL. OF THE CITY .07 RANCHO CUCAMONCA, COUNTY Oy SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A i PORTION OF SAN DIEGO AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND NORTH OF SAN BERMANDIHO ROAD a D. COg9ERY ORDII111Cd8 The following Ordinancaa Lave had public hearings at the tm of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Lay item can be removed for discussion. I I I I I I 1. CONSIDERATION OF PROHIBITING CHLOROFLUOROCARBOl•8 (CFC'8) I IN PROCESSED FOOD PACKAGING. [ ORDINANCE NO. 371 (second reading) 113 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO COCANOHGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.22 EHTITLED "PROHIBITION OF CHLOHOPLUOROCARBON iROCESSED FOOD PACKAGING" 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT GDDH AMENDMENT 88 -05 - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA - An amendment to Chaptor 17.18, Hilleide Residential, Section 17.18.040 8.2(c) regarding development within the Alquist- Pr:olo 9pucial Studies Zone. ORDINANCE NO. 375 (second reading) 1 119 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.18 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CUTE REGARDING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE ALQUIST- PRIOLO SPECIAL STUDIES ZONE 4 N M:.. PAGE City Council Agenda October 5, 1988 1 11 Z. ADFBRTTHXD Pm7TC BEARINGS The following item have been advertised and /or posted as public hearings as required by lo. The chair will open the meting to reecivs public testimony. 1. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION VMS . ANNB7fATI0N OH LOTS 4 THROUGH 12 3NCLQBIVS OH TRACT 120 A 8583 LOGAiBD ON NONT6 VIBTA CODRT. BAST OH BASTWOOD AVENUE TO LAND9GPB MLAINTgNANCB DISTRICT N0-.I . RESOLUTION NO. 88 -009 122 A asoLuTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE NORL IN CONNECTION WITH TILL ANNEXATION OF LOTS 4 THBOUGh 12 INCLUSIVE OF TRACT 8583 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGMMR'S REPORT FOR LOTS 4 THROUGH 12 INCLUSIVE OF TRACY 8583 B. ANNEXATION 0Y TRACT N09. 8369, 8805 AND 8806, LOCATED EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL 127 AND BASE LING ROAD TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NU. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 88-610 129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORE IN CONNECTION WITH THE ANNEXATION OF TRACTS 8369, 8805 AND 8806 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACTS 8369, 8805 )do 8806 2. ENVIRONN3NTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 88 -16 - PULSAR- 134 Appeal of the Planning Tommisaion s decision approving a request to reduce the minimum lot depth from 100 feet to 94 feet and 95 feet for two lot■ in conjunction with a residential subdivision of 154 single family lots on 71.33 &area of land located ve %t of Rtivanda Avenue, I between Sumnit and Highland Avenues - APN 225- 161 -35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55, 61 and 225 - 171 -01, 09, 10, 17. PAGE City Council Agenda October 5, 1988 12 � E ih �1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13812- 134 PULSAR - Appeal of the Planning Comsiscion s decision approving a residential subdivision of 154 single family lots on 71.33 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etivanda Specific Plan and the LOW Residential Central Plan Designation (2-4 dwelling units par acre), located vest of Etivanda Avenue,.betveen Summit and Highland Avenues e - AYH 225 - 161 -35, 36, 37, 30, 49, 53, 55, 61 sad 225- 171-01, 09, 10, 17. 3. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL POI TENTATIVE 176 IRACT 13367 - W73CTE888N:E DHVELOpmn COMPANY - Appeal of the Planning Commission decision requiring tte payment of in -lieu fees for future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along Eellman Avenue end Amethyst Avenue for a subdivision of 6.87 acres if land Lute 19 single family lots in the Low Residential District 2-0 dwelling units per acre, located vest of the intersection of Amethyst Avenue and Highland Avenue - AP14 201 - 711.01, 02, 03. 7. P10LIC HEARTmag The following itear have an legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meting to receive public testimony. No items submitted. C. CIS! MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although tLe Chair nay open the meeting for public input. 1. REPORT FROM CUCAHONCA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ON WATER PRUSUP.E PROBLEMS SLIM Of HILLSIDE IN THE VICINITY OF SAPPHIkE. Continued from September 21, 1988 meeting) 2. CONSIDERATION OF A REVISED TRAFFIC SIGNAL ILLUMINATED 202 STRUT NAME SIGN vACB DESIGN. Coatiuu. from September 21, 1988 meeting � E ''�'_1 -•; / `.K /0 . • .',1 City Comeil Agenda ys,y9 • October 5, 1988 PAGE' 13 - ,'N. COUNCIL AUBIli38 j The following items ba4e been requested by the City C.mucil for diarnasiuc. They era not public bearing itesu, although the Chair tray open the meatag for public ihput. 1. UPDATE REPOdT -ON RECYCLING PROCBAK. I. IIIouyiCATION ±O► I1m16 i0R == nrrmC This is `he tire for Citj Council to identify the Items' they wish tc discuss at the next meting. These Items will not be discussed at this Meeting, only identified for the next matins. J. COVMMCMONB PROM TER PUBLIC This is the tins and place, for the geaaral public to addrors the City Council, state law ptchibita the City Council from oddreesing any issuo not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council my receive testimony and not the utter for a subsepua a: meeting. werents ere to be limited to five minutes per individt'al. L ADJOU2MMAI I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of N City of P.eacho Cuaanouga, hereby certify that a try � gate copy of the foregoing agenda was poated on 8eptt, r d, 198d, armanty- two (72) bourn prior to the Meeting par A.B. 2674 at 9320 -C ' Base Line Road. i N C :a .y Seot�aber 21, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONfd CITY OODNCLL MMUTRS Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met as Wednesday, September 21, 1988, in the Lions Park Co• -% +•'y Center, 9161 Base Lino Road, Rancho Cueam mga, California. The meet, was wiled to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Couueilmembera: Deborah N. Brow, Cbt clps J. taquet II, Jeffrey Xing, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present water City Manager, Lauren N. Was Attorney, J as Markmau; City Clerk Beverly A. Authelet; Assistant er. Jack Lam; Sr. Administrative Assistant, Mark R. Lorimer; City fired Buller; City Coginser, Russell Maguire; Deputy City Engineer, William bttva; Associate Civil En0ineet, Jim Harris; Senior Planner, Larry Henderson; and Snnior Planner, Dan G.leman. f f f f p p B. ARBOCNCBMSRIS/PRBSRMYATIONS B1. Presentation of a proclamation to Ralph Louis for his outstanding service on the Rancho Cucamonga Coscuniry Foundation Board of Directors. B2. Lauren Wasearman, City Manger, announced that Consent Calendar Item CIS be removed because the applicant did not get all of the information in to star£ on time The Manager's Staff Report Number 05, a letter had been received by the new owner who bad requested the item be tabled until October 5, 1988. He stated that the Council needed to recess to a closed session regarding the park in northeast Etivanda, since the people who veto here to represent the City are paid by the hour. Mayor Stout adjourned the meeting to Closed Session at 7:35 psm. The meeting reconvened at 7:50 p m. with all mothers of the Council present. f f f It f f C. CORSM CALENDAR C1. Approval of Minutes: September 7, 1988 (Brow and Stout absent bs• fti 4 i City Counoil;Miwite q;- •,` September 21, 1988 , Page 2 Ci. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. 9/7/88 add 9/14/88, and Payroll ending 9/1/88 f(m the total amount-of $1,672,816.02. 1 - C3.Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General Public Premises, Bide A While, Carole 6 William McIntosh, 9469 Foothill Boulevard. C4. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement Amendaent (CO 88 -084) between the City of Rambo Cucn� zga and ASL Consulting Engineers for the Church - Hermosa Storm Drein to clarify the fee schedule and correct the Exhibit callouts. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) C5. Approval of Contract Change Order No. 5 (00 85 -062) for the preparation of final construction plane and specifications for Day Crank Improvement Project by Wiildan Associates in the amount of $44,500, to bring the contract total to $670,283 to be paid from Day Creek Improvement fund (A /C 86-4637.4028). (0602- 01 CONT AMEN) C6. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 87 -163) for a Professional Services Agreement with BSI Consultants to provide additional services in preparing striping ant signing plans, specifications, estimates for 19th Street from Archibald to F,ermoss and frog Cartilla to Haven Avenue and redesign driveway at APR 202 - 191 -28 for the amount of $7,160 to be funded from System Development Fund Accw=t No. 22- 4637 -8744. (0602 -01 CONE AMEN) Cl- Approval to award the "Cinch Street Rehabilitation, Improvement Project between Vineyard Avenue and Baker Avenue" to Gentry Brothers Incorporated for the amouaL of $120,330 ($109,388.65 plus 102 contingency) to be funded from Gas Tax, Account No. 09 -4637 -8815. (0601 -01 BID) CB. Approval to award the Stivanda I and II Street Rehabilitation Improvement Project in the vicinity of Pecan Avenue and Catalpa Street to Laird Construction Company, Incorporated, fur the amount of $165,992.06 to be funded from Can Tax, Account No. 09- 4637 -8701 and 09- 4637 -8703. (0601 -01 BID) C9. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -152) for the Replacement of White Alder :reee (Tract 11934) Improvement Project vest of Victoria Park Lane awardeJ to Steven Schultz Company, Incorporated for the amount of $37,458 to be funded from Landscape Maintenance District 2, Account No. 41- 4130 -8769 with a loan from Beautification Funds. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) C10. Approval of a Joint Park School Agreement (CO 86 -153) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Alta Loma School District for Victoria Groves Park. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) C11 Approval to execute Agreement (CO 88 -154) for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Irene Horvath and the City of Rancho Cucamonga far street frontage improvements along the southeast corner property ya,'tiYlO .. *l'M "•`l'1 i �P' Y:-•.. v. ..r , =°Nq ' %r4: �t.��yR'r:`�. ,r ±r City Council Minutee ' Eby + we September 21,1988 ...•, Page 3 r: A Amethyst YrN, at Street and 19th Street for the Amathyst at 19 Lh Street it = Reconstruction Protect. (0602 -01 AGREE PI) f E4SOLUTION M 88 -555 ,w A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCII. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO )r CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE AGRE11HENT FOR } , INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM " IRENE HORVATH FOR AMETHYST AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION AT NINETEENTH STREET ' , r 3' C12. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the ' r, proposed street improvemmuts at the intersection of 19th Street and HBVea Avenue "S and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore. (1401-06 EIS) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -556 A RESOLUTION OF TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO _ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVnJG THE ENVIRONIHNTAL INITIAL y STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT THH INTERSECTIOA OF 19TH SIR= AND HAVEN AVENUE -; 'r C13. Apprc-al to formalize the current policy regarding release of Building Occupancy and its Relationship to Completion of Related Public Improvements by adoption of Resolution. (0102 -02 POLICY) ti RESOLUTION NO. 88 -557 A RESOLUTION OF TIDE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CITY ENGINEDR'S POLICY REQUIRING COMPLETION OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS A PREREQUISITE TO ENERGY CONNECTIONS C14. Approval of a Subordination Agreement (CO 88 -155) for 8797 Strang Lane, submitted by William and Penny McA)pine. (0602 -01 AGREE SUB) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -558 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM WILLIAM AND PENNY MCALPM AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY LURK TO SIGN SANE 033: A7prolai--of-- MCD°e— ICaeeai ivn— vflnnre�n e-- #merwawe.rw�...l— F.....M..w J n City Council Minutes September 21, 1988 ` Page 4 0 .e'a- r3gs6t- h eat Cotner of ema, evb.itted�"8j3 Broelt and Gone. I= RM909®. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -559 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING I.MPROVEIffiNr ACREEmrs, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL NAP OF TRACT NOS. 13748, 13857 AND 13858 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -560 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERUIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE /LIGHTMC HAIhMnHCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT NOS. 13748, 13857 AND 13858 C16. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Haintenance District Hog. I and 6 for DR 87 -28, located on the vast side of Lucas Ranch Road, south of Sixth Street, submitted by Janice R. and Jerald 8. Laird (0602 -01 AGREE IMPR)(0401 -03 INSCAPE MD)(0401 -03 ST IT MD) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -561 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -28 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -562 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE /LICUTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR DR 87 -28 (LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6) C17. Approval to "acute Improvement Agreement cad Improvement Security, and. Ordoring the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DE 87 -55, located on the east side of Rochester Avenue, north of the ATASF, submitted by Eighth and Rochester, A Limited Partn:rahip. (0602 -01 AGREE IMPR)(0401 -03 ST LT ND)(0401 -03 UiSCAPE MD) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -563 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO i <r i r, f r 4 4 City Council Minutes September 21, 1988 Page 5 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -55 RPSOT•UTION N0. 88 -564 A RESOLUTION OF T88 CITY COUNCIL v OI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ITT t3:.EXATION OF CERTAIN URRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE /LIGHTING :7TSNAHCS DISTRICT FOR DR 87 -55 C18. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract 13270, located on the norLhvest Cotner of Church Street and Milliken venue, submitted by Western Properties. (0602 -01 AGREE Ih'PR )(0401 -03 LNSCAPE ND)(0401 -03 ST IT NO) (1002 -09 MAP FINAL) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -565 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL NAP OF TRACT NO. 13270 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -566 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE /LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT 13270 (LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4; STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4) C19. Approval of Nap, execution of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Ne. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract 132739 located on the suuthesst corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain Viev Drive, a6mitted by Western Properties. (0602 -01 AGREE IMER)(1002 -09 NAP FINAL)(0401 -03 LNSCAPE MD) (0401 -03 BY IT MD) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -567 A RESOLUTION OF ThE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGR6N3NT AND IhPROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT 13273 RESOLUTION P.O. 88 -568 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTA0 City Council Mlnutes September 21, 1988 Page 6 TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE /LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT 13273 (LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ,41 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4) C20. Approval to Execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 85 -19, located on the southvest corner of Foothill boulevard and Ramona Avenue, submitted by Ken Ruby Construction. (0602 -01 AGREE IMPR)(0401 -03 I.NSCAPE MD)(0401 -03 BY IT MD) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -569 A RBSOLOrION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPSOVINC IHPROVEMzNT AGREEHeNT AND IMPROVEHBNr SECURITY FOR CUP 85 -19 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -570 A RESOLUTION OF TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANOSCAPS/LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR CUP 85 -19 (LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 31 STREET LICHT FAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6) C21. Approval to execute Improvement Agreemant Extension for Parcel Map 9504 located on the northeast comer of Haven Avenue and Rase Line Road, submitted by Base Lino and Uavun Center. (0602 -01 AGREE EM) RESOLUTION N0. 88 -571 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ErrENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 9504 C22 Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Nap 10771, located on the south vide of Nilson Avenue cast of Chaffey College, submitted by Grigsby Development. (0602 -01 AGREE EM) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -572 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EMNSI09 AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 10771 C23. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12650 -39 located on lbe east side of Haven Avenue, north of Hillside Road, submitted by Deer Creek Company. (0602 -01 AGREE EXIN) s .1 +:' City Council Minutes September 21, 1988 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -573 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ETTBBSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12650 -3 C24. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tracts 12671 -1, 12671 -2, 12671 -3 and 12671.4, located on the northwest comer of Milliken Avenue and Mountain Vim Drive, submitted by Lewis Homes. (0602-01 ACRES RXrN) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -574 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACTS 12671 -1, 12671 -2, 12671 -3 AND 12671 -4 C25. Approval of Map, execution of Agreement (CO 88 -156) for Postponement of Recordation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 13248, located on the south side of Highland Avenue, between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues, submitted by R 6 8 Capital Enterprises. (0602 -01 AGREE IMPR) (0602 -01 CONrRACr)(3002 -09 MAP FINAL)(0401 -03 LNS('APE X0)(0401 -03 ST LT }D)) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -575 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEY21U AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT 02 RECORDATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTAICTIONS AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13248 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -576 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTArN TERRITORY TO A LARDSCAPE /LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT 13245 (LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 11 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2) C26. Approval to accept improvements, release of bonds and file a =ties of completion fort (0602 -01 BOND REL)(0704 -18 NOT ODHPLT) Parcel Mao 8842, Parcel 2. located on Terra Vista Parkway, east of Spruce Avenuo Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 1 52,000 r ' :.. r Y-..• .�vlr. =..'A:l:.i�i4`i`$�yrGk: :i`.�_ _. . ,� V � .a.,a�.::x�_ ."ti _i' - sawy:,`,C.:th�. City Council Ninute0' ��ypp si • a ',e:m September 21, 1988 Page 8 fa:),�< ,ABSOLUTION NO. 88 -577 xi _ A HBSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO -% CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA., ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROV81&NIS FOR PARCEL NAP 8942, 'PARCEL 2 AND AIPRORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE Or COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DR 86 -26 Phase II (PH 10237).'located on the north side of Jersey Boulevard between Utica Avenue and Vincent Avenue Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $195,000 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -378 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO COCAIIONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 86 -26 PHASE 7I (PH 10237) AND AUTHORIZING THS FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TAE WORK Tract No. 12772 -2. loeeted on the east side of Ramona Avenue between Base ' Line Road and Church Street Releases Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 60,000 ' Accepts Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 6,VOO RESOLUTION NO. 88 -579 A RESOLUTION 09 THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT'S FOR TRACT NO. 12772 -2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FITTING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Tract No. 12772, located on the east side of Ramose Avenue between Base Line Road and Church Street Releases Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $300,000 Accept: Haintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 30,000 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -5e0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 12772 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK i> i k r City Council Minutes September 21, 1908 - Page 9 Tract No. 12835, located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue north of Arrov Highway Releases Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 83,000 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 8,300 RESOLUTION NO. 08 -581 A RESOLUTION OT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12835 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C27. Approval to accept improvements, release Maintenanne Guarantee Bond for Tract 11350, located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road aoL Hermosa Avenue. (0602 -01 BOND f 3.) Releases Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 21,000 Maintenance Guarantee Bead (Street) $ 3,000 C28. Approval to accept the Archibald Realignment Project, between 19th Street and Highland Avenue, Contract No. 87 -142 as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $345,883.46. (0704 -18 NOT COMPLT)(0602 -01 BOND BBL) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -582 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ARCHIBALD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CONTRACT NO. 87 -142 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE C29. Approval to accept the improvements of Archibald Avenue at the Southern Pactfic Railroad Crossing 08- SBd- O-BCue- BRS- RO78(2) as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $116,739.44. (0704 -18 NOT OOMPLT)(0602 -01 BOND SET) RESOLUTION MO. 88 -583 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AT THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CROSSING AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council ,Minutei September 21, 1988., Page 10 C30. Approval to change from the American Trust,IRubell Helm Medical Insurance Plan to the Principal Financial Croup Mediasl Insurance Plan. (0502 -02 PERSONNEL) C31. Approval to destroy records and documents from the Administration Department and Planning Division which are no lonller needed. (0304 -00 REC MCMT) + RESOLUIICN NO. 88 -584 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION :14090 NOTION: Moved by Ring, eecooded by Wright to approve the Consent Calendar minua Item CIS. Motion carried unaniumusly, 5 -0. a a • • a a D. COSSINr ORDINANCES D2 ORDINANCE NO. 374 ( second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CC:nCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY C UNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE BCARD ^F ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM ORDINANCE NO. 373 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF In CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, yODIFYINO CHAPTER 10.56 OF TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA M MICIPLL CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR THE DESIGNATION OF UNRESTRICTED TRUCK ROUTES, RESTRICTED TRUCK ROUTES, CONNSRCIAL AND CERTAIN OTHER VEHICLES PROHIBITED PROM USING CERTAIN CITY STREETS, AND DESIGNATION OF TERMINAL ACCESS BOWIES FOR EXTRA -LAAGS TRUCKS A s, n•' '9),. -:7+ r },r�+i.�lsu�'K`"t ;.y�'yyt�2`"'.:s{�.1+°.e`�t:ny /Kx: i�.3'[n'[•.'; .- h[` }3.v -= s_e'i.•✓'i �'Yni R3�r"y� City Cauncil minutes September 21; 1988 Page 11 City Clerk read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 373 and 374. MOTIONS Moved by King[ seconded by Buquet to waive full- reading and approve said Ordinances. lotion carried unanimously[ 5 -0. * * ** ** E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS E1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SIGN ORDINANCE AMBNDNENT 88-01 - a.u.�nv w[aewnm - various arunoments to toe sign urdinanca regarding neon signs and window signs. (Continued from August 17, 1988 meeting) Request that it" be continued to Octohe. 19, 1988. (0907 -02 SIGNS) 02OXHUM NO. 358 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE ABXHDHRHT 88 -01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO C9CANONGA MIRIICTPAL CODE TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR NEON AND WINDOW SIGMA AND ADDING PROVISION FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS FOR CITY SPONSORCD SPECIAL EVENTS MOTIONS Moved by Wright, seconded by King to continue to October 19, 1988. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. e * * * * * E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEFRLOPMRScr mnR ANENDNANe AA_nc asawU cuceNUnua - An amendment to chapter 17.18, Hillside Residential, Section 17.18.040 B.2 (c) regarding development within the Alquist- Priolo Special Studies Zone. Staff report presented by Dan Coleman, Sr. Planner. (0203 -03 DC AMEN) Mayor Stout opeced the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. ORDINANCE N0. 375 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCII. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.18 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE ALQUIST- PRIOLO SPECIAL STUDIES ZCQM City Clark Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 375. MOTIONS Moved by Ring, seconded by Buquat to waive full reading of said Ordinance and set aec,nd reading for 0 Sober 5, 1988. Notion carried unanimously, 5 -0. F ,I+i,pr� { °� �f�, �' �+ it, 4a,+ +�s�- 5+.- :L'�,- ..Y- �_S`�•l °.. .s;,.- •. .: Yii•¢r.�r�,n4'q��.- oZ•.+a�... ' tk&-'6 . 1, City Couae it Minutes;; Septembor Page 12 1 '7. PUBLIC BEARD" Hr. Maguire pointed out this we a State highway which has a different procedure from ours. A district has to be formed first before we can talk with the people. Councilmen Buquet asked if informational material will be sent to all the residents. Hr Maguire responded that wa would be doing that for oath section as we go along 19th Street. Mayor Stout oi•ened the meeting for public hearing. There being no responso, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -585 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTRD6MOS OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON IRS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10323 19TH SI'6EET AND THE PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN 10301 AND 10323 19TH STREET, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFOENIA CODES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS SECTION 5870 TORO 5680 MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 Op IMPROVEMENT ACT Of 1911 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 88 -585 ordering the construction of public improvements on 19th Street. Notion carried unanimously, 5 -0. r+ r r r w C. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS G1. RECONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED DRIVE APPROACH AT 8362 HILLSIDE DOA BY MIS. CHERYL RAHIRBZ. Continued from September 7, 1988 meeti report presented by Ruasoll Maguire, City Engineer. (1002 -02 ACCESS) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for comments by the applicant. 0 City Council Minutes " September 21, 1988 Page 13 Mrs. Ramirez, who stated that nothing had actually changed. She did have S some new pictures sbowing other houses which bad not moved their old ;! driveways. Mayor Stout opened ilia meting for other public comments. There being no response, the public meeting van closed. Councilman Ring stated that based on the realignment of the driveway with a " curb and gutters being placed across the old drive, he could go along with the new plans. Councilva— Wright also expressed it was acceptable as proposed. In respect to the curb and gutters, ebe also could go along with it. Brad Buller, Clty Plaamers stated the staff was recommending that soee of the asphalt am the old drive be removed so there would not be Any parking on the old drive. Councilman Buquet mtpressed conceim regarding the proximity of the trails; however, with the new dee43ns he did not feel this would present any problem. Councilwoman Brow also expressed that the curb and gutter was sufficient; no problems with the new plans. MOTIONS Moved ky Ling, seconded by Wright to allow the new driveway approach as presented. The applicant be required to curb and gutter the old drive approach. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. e e e e c e 177 meeting) TO BB COBLTNVSD TO OCfOBSR 5, 1988 AT TIM REQUEST OF WATER DISTRICT (1204 -00 WATER) MDTIONt Moved by Buquets seconded by Ling to continue the item to October 5, 1988. Motion carries unanimously, 5 -0. a e w e a e C3. REPORT ON NAINTgRANCE COST FOR WINDROW TREES /POTENTIAL TREK PRESERVATION ORDINANCE REVISIONS - Staff will present a report on the cost of maintaining windrow trees. (Coatinued from August 179 19SS meeting) Staff report presented by William Silva, Deputy City Engineer. (0203 -02 TREES) Councilwoman Brow wanted to know, and wanted it included in the report, at what point this be equitable to the people. In other words, she asked at what point would this become not so cumbersome upon the people. i= f� a ;s �;�'i( /_S•{._°...` i'r': �. r:. _• s �' J'+`': v'� ' City CowcilTMi tear„ °' September 21, 19885', Page 14 - 9 irrigation Ligq requested a bieakdevo` of the 9140.00 in terms of trimming and irrigation. Councilman Buquet expressed that ve could reduce some of the cost in soft) ways, y3 such as planting treat-16-20 feet from the center line, instead of 8 -10 feet, thus thinning out the trees. i ' ACTIOHt Cowell received and filed the report. Q4. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE SITE OF THE HAVEN AWMM RR1MTVVP4TTnV report gl^.lOLO7'I'JN NO. 88 -586 A RESOLUTION Op THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOHGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROvING DESIGNATION OF THE SITE OF THE HAVER AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT, LOCAT81) IN THE M EDIPA ISLANDS B97MN FOOTHILL AND WILSON AS A POINT OP HISTORIC INTEREST MOTIONS Moved by Nrights seconded by Huquet to approve Perolutiom No. 88 -586 designating the Haven Avenue Beautification Project at a point of historic interest. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. t ttrtt C5. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE RELPU HOUSE, 9468 LOMITA, A LANDMARK. (TABLED TO OCI068A 5, 1988 1402 -06 HISTORY) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -587 A RESOLUTION OF THE ^.TTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, " ALIFORNIA, i.PPROVING DESIGNATION OP THE RELpH HOUSE, LOCATED AT 9463 L"--t AVENUE AS A LANDMARK ACTIONS fabled to October 5, 1988 t t t t t t G6. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 7165 ETINANDA AVENUE - (Continued from August 3, 1988 meeting Btaff report presentee City Planner. (1402 -06 HISTORY) Mayor Stout opened the mooting for public bearing. s ` yMh ' -- r.N' �LS.E;•. �S2b' 4�� y �;Utr - .. ' City Council Minutes September 21, 1988 Page 15 Mr. Ylm:lar stated be did not wish' to address Council, but bad presented Council with a letter for informational purposes. There being no other public response, Mayor Stout closed the public bearing. Councilman King expressed there we no time crmch regarding this house, and felt we were setting a badiprecedent. If'we would work with Mr. Floeker, he thought we could come to an amiable agreement., Ee also expressed that in his opinion, ve vein beginning to dictate to people what they were going to do with their property above and beyond normal planning issues. , Councilman Buquet expressed that it was appropriate for Council to take necessary action in order to preserve historical property; and be personally felt the historical designation would, erhance this property. RESOLUTION N0. 88-406 I. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF rNI CIrY Oy RANCHO .UCAMOHU, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION Or THE 7188ER HOUSE LOCATED AT 7165 ETINANDA AVENUE AS A LANDMARK MOTIONe Moved by Burnet, seconded by Writhe to approve Rasolution No. 88 -406. Notion carried 4 -1-0 (King, not. were** f L7' y DES + 02 c Mayer Stout upened the Heating for public input. Addresd7g Council vast John Nicolopolous felt that $450.00 was excessive for a street sign. There being no further public input, Mayor Stout closed the public portion of the .:eating. Mr. Maguire, City Engineer, emphasized we were already spending $450.00 on each illuminated sign on the traffic signal. All staff was proposing to do was change the face of the sign to have the City was or logo included, which would run approximately $50.00 more per sign. Mr. wascermen, City )*eaeger, pointed out that a lot of the Big" going in are paid for by developer fees, and that money cannot be spent for other uses. Councilman Buquet expressed he would like to see some information come back with overall costs impacts. City Council Minutes, September 21, 1988 ' Page 16 Councilwoman Wright asked that there be a report w tow many signs we were ` talking about. Mi7rIOHe Moved by Buquet, aeeonded by King to continue this item to October S, 1988. Motion carried unaniakvisly 5-0. t 4 ♦ s e e Mayor Stout called ■ recess at SOO p.m. the meeting reconvened at 9tO5 p.m. with all members of Council present. aaarae N. CODE= 5USMt8S Hl. CONSIDERATION TO CHEATS A TASK FORCE TO ASSZSS LONG TERM SPORTS FACILITIES NEEDS. Continued from September 7, 1988 meeting 6404 -06 PK DE98L) Mayor Stout combined this Item with member B3 CaHRIDERATION TO CHANCIC DESIGN OF CENTRAL PARK (KING). Mayor Stout stated that not only would he like to see a task force created to study long -tars sports needs in the co ®amity, he thought. a sports complex should be built in the industrial area so there would not lie any problems with neighboring bones. Councilman King expressed the coemunity was lacking sports facilities, and felt a concerted effort should be made now to provide and develop more attire park apace. He felt a halt should be put oa the processirg of Central Park since there were not any sport fields include.. Altbuugh he felt a task force was a Brest idea, he did not want to sac it used to delay something. Mayor Stout opened the meting for public hearing. Addressing Council verse Bill Holley, advocate far perks, supported the concept of a major sports Complex design and for Council to proceed in locating it place for it other than Central Park. Bob Martin, spokesman for Rancto Cucamonga Youth Sport. OrSanisation, felt that G ntral Park should be built in phases with spires fields ba.ug done first He urged Council to vote no, and to disregard the present plan and plan it Chases. Diane William pointed out that the present plan ine ludea the only ewier+ing poolo and basketball courts in the City. Debbie Humphrius stated the purchase of their home was prad)cated on the development of this as a passive park. They would be upset if the plan City Council Minutes` September "211 1988.', Page ly should be cha -ged. 'they wantef sports fields to ba place further south where residents would net be impacted. Dan Rosso, Preoidaut of Vineyard Little League, stated the needs of the City have changed, and that we do have a problem because there are dot enough sport fields. Rim Plarents stated she wanted Council to look for an alternative place to met the needs of the children. She felt there could be a compromise made with both sides. Hal Plummer expressed 1:Iat not everyone plays youth sports, aid we, need parka far all uses. A woman presented Council' with signed petitions entitled Potittoz Against Proposed Changes to Central. Perk. Said petitions were presented as part of the record. Bob Bradley, mombet of the original task force, wanted to know what credibility was there on the part of Council to create another task force to do what had already been accomplished. Russell Paussant stated the whole area around the Park was a bedroom area. Karen Day urged Council not to make changes in the present Central Perk plan. Pam Henry, Chairwoman of the Parka 6 Recreation Commission, cited frrm the City -vide Survey that had been conducted by Cal Poly that youth sports placed number eight on the Survey, vbila picnicing placed number one. There being no further public input, Mayor Stout closed the public portioa of the mating. Councilman Buquet felt ve should move ahead, that a task force should be formed to look at sites which would not impact residential areas. Councilman King felt we needed to re -look at the Central Par:, design and to move. forward with a task force. Councilwman Wright concurred that she did not feel w needed to scuttle the Park, but there were many important needs and ve my need to fine tune the plan iu order to meet some of those needs; concurred that we needed to proceed with a task force to look into this. Counc,two=n brow "pressed we had committed a lot of money to the design of the Park. At that ti", Councilman King had expressed concern about the lakes and felt chars should be a youth sports area instead. Council dealt with It at ' "' +,.:.y...,'s rfi - �_+�yr.9 "�;ciwc.• yia - ° - _ .. `i"e3`ht. i City Council Niniat6�:. - September 21, 1988_ Pass 18 that time. She felt: a task'force "a a god Idea for future uses; felt tbia , park addressed the needs of the long tare of R.ncho Oucamonga; felt the high, intense sports should be placed iu the industrial area. rerhapo we should proceed with a sporto complex first, and then addresi Central Park. Mayor Stout expressed that there were rthur alternative*. Ai example, he felt the $750,000.00 that had been committed from the budget thi, year to proceed with Central Park design could be used to look for other sites. He did met want to give up with the prosent design ua Central Palk. pti MOTIONt Moved by Buquat, seconded by Ring to suspend all activity on design rt(r implementation of Central Part for a period o! sixty (60) days, to Tom a task II, force, to do so assessmee of the various needs of the sports groups and repnrt A,1 back to Council regarding the alternatives available. Notion carried 4 -1-0 (Brow, no). (Councilwoman grown seated she liked the plan at preumted. She bad no problem of taking the $750,093.00 to aUress the youth sports trice..) p ##Ia ## t H2. DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEC..TE FOR LEAGUE ANNUAL CONFERENCE. (First + discussed on August 17, 1988 ACTION$ Council Appointed Councilman Buquet as the voting delegate. t, H3. CONSIDERATION TO CHAN0 DESIGN OF CENTRAL PARR M ). 'v (CDH533MD kLTH ITS11 Hi CONSIDERATION TO CREATE A TAS. FORCE TO 13SESS LOEG TERN SPORTS neturI88 HEEDS, # ## # #a H4. RFPORT ON THE REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE (BU UBT ). (1110 710 STREET PI) Ran Bollinger, attorney for San Antonio Communitr Hospital, vented to know who was going to pay for the $70,000.00 traffic study. He frlc they should only have to pay for their portion. M'rl'ION, Moved by Buquet# seconded by Wright for Sea Antonio Community Hospital to praead to the :laaniug Commission with a specific plan amendment to vaive the requirements of a traffic study, and eliminate the realignment to Grove A%enun. Motion carried 4 -1-0 (Stout, no). # ###e# 0 ; e .r LL nil city Counei - September 'v 2e12 start report presented by Mark LOrlswer, ar. Adminlattatlwe A79lataat. Y•, 1180-10 COHPIAIMT) Addressing Council vas: Dee Hurray from the,Cesa Volante Mobile Home Park, who informed Council of some of the past - proble" 'at the Labor Camp. ., AC'rIONe Council received and filed the report, and directed staff to submit' progrbse reports back to the Council. ' e# e e e e I. IDINTIVICATION OF ITS FOR Kxxr M9xTIMC Councilwoman brave requested that an update report on recycling be submitted on October 5, 1988. • e e e ► e J_COMOII'CATICNB reel Tug K;IrC There were none. ! A 1 4 J R�AAt']�tltiOPMT MDTIONC Moved by Buquet, arcoLded by Drova to adjourn. Motion carred unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjournaA at 127tu a.m. Approvedt e 1 Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk .r j A. CALL TO IRDER 4 A workshop held with the City Council and the Chamber of Commerce met on Wednesday, August 31, 1988. The workshop vas called to order at 6800 p.m. by $ Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Couneilmemberst Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey _ King (arrived at 6 :40 p.m.), Pamela J Wright (arrived at 6t20 p.m.), and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present werat City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Clerk, Beverly A. Autheleti City Planner, Brad Buller,, Senior Planar, Dan Coleman{ Community Code Representative Supervisor, Richard Alcorn. Members of the Chamber present words President, Jim Medeiroai Manger, Danielle Watson; Sandra Diedlei Mike Mitchelli Bon Magruder; Tom Flyani Dole Priabee. * * * * a B. STAFF REPORTS f! 01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SIGN ORDINANCE AKENDMENr 88 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Various amendments to the Sign Ordinance regarding neon signs and windry signs. Staff report presented by Dan Colemans Senior Planner. (0807 -03 SIGNS) TEMPORARY WINDOW SIGNS, Maycr Stout started the meeting by stating the ides that soma businesses have located iu industrial parks, because of lower costs, has created a problem. He felt there must be someway to come up with a system to allow advertising in these areas without looking like a commercial strip center. "here needs to be some type of system, b6t ve do act want the industrial area to lose its appearance. This is a majar problem to be resolved, because tenants end-up leasing in areas where they are not suppose to be. After discussing some nonconforming uses an Foothill, namely the A- frame, Councilwoman Brow expressed that she felt sign regulations were suppose to be by area in the City not by zones. Mayor Stout responded that some type of standard needed to be set to allow flexibility. If we do not have some type of restrictions then the Planning Co®ission will continue to ell" industrial buildings with small windows, and then they will be leased to uses not appropriate to the building. Councilwoman Brow further expressed that we are in a growing phase in the City, and perhaps theme will not be A problem in the future. i. 4e August 31, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES r Adjourned Heating A. CALL TO IRDER 4 A workshop held with the City Council and the Chamber of Commerce met on Wednesday, August 31, 1988. The workshop vas called to order at 6800 p.m. by $ Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Couneilmemberst Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey _ King (arrived at 6 :40 p.m.), Pamela J Wright (arrived at 6t20 p.m.), and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present werat City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Clerk, Beverly A. Autheleti City Planner, Brad Buller,, Senior Planar, Dan Coleman{ Community Code Representative Supervisor, Richard Alcorn. Members of the Chamber present words President, Jim Medeiroai Manger, Danielle Watson; Sandra Diedlei Mike Mitchelli Bon Magruder; Tom Flyani Dole Priabee. * * * * a B. STAFF REPORTS f! 01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SIGN ORDINANCE AKENDMENr 88 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Various amendments to the Sign Ordinance regarding neon signs and windry signs. Staff report presented by Dan Colemans Senior Planner. (0807 -03 SIGNS) TEMPORARY WINDOW SIGNS, Maycr Stout started the meeting by stating the ides that soma businesses have located iu industrial parks, because of lower costs, has created a problem. He felt there must be someway to come up with a system to allow advertising in these areas without looking like a commercial strip center. "here needs to be some type of system, b6t ve do act want the industrial area to lose its appearance. This is a majar problem to be resolved, because tenants end-up leasing in areas where they are not suppose to be. After discussing some nonconforming uses an Foothill, namely the A- frame, Councilwoman Brow expressed that she felt sign regulations were suppose to be by area in the City not by zones. Mayor Stout responded that some type of standard needed to be set to allow flexibility. If we do not have some type of restrictions then the Planning Co®ission will continue to ell" industrial buildings with small windows, and then they will be leased to uses not appropriate to the building. Councilwoman Brow further expressed that we are in a growing phase in the City, and perhaps theme will not be A problem in the future. 73 A �a 4 I 4 i. c t I :r T y 9 M1 City Conseil Minutes August 31, 1988 Page 2 Brad Buller, City Planner, suggested that perhaps we could have ranges like we do with densities, which could be worked out at the sign program level. Staff was asked if we have a program that could monitor the sigma. Mr. Duller responded that we are beginning to form a program, and when it is completed, ve will be able to do the monitoring. A question was asked about using the CUP process for temporary window signs. Hr. Buller responded that he did not feel the City Council would want to get involved with the CUP process for signs; it would be rather time consuming. Mayor Stout asked why ve were not using the permit process. Has it because it was difficult .o enforce? Mr. Buller responded that it was very difficult to administer, because Temporary signs come and go. Richard Alcorn, Community Code Representative Supervisor, stated that the main issue with siguc was the care and maintenance of than. Mr. Buller stated that what we would like to see is shopping centers policing themselves and to join together in a aignage and promotion program. Discussion focused around paper signs, Section H, which states "paper signs are encouraged to be mounted in hanging frames for a more permanent appearance ". Mr. Buller explained that many gr..cery stores and larger companies had a way to hang paper signs, some used permanent auction hooks and other methods for hanging these signs. He suggested having some sign seminars where we could have a professional come in to conduct them. He then sued up the following for items to be considered: (1) Develop a policy :or maintenance of signs; for temporary signs create a category which does mot require permits. (2) Look at the policy regarding mounting paper signs and special event signs. (3) Look at the sign program to be sure its flexible in relation to square footage. Mayor Stout stated he would like the following also to be considered: (1) Encourage centers to have a center sign promotion. (2) Have the City and Chamber work together on a catalog of businesses in the City to be listed by name. service, and geological location. (3) Conduct some educational seminars. Once this was worked out between the City and the Chamber, he would like to see the Chamber pass a resolution in support of it. He felt this had been lacking in the past. Jim Medeiros, Chamber President, stated that the Chamber would like to help in the drafting of this procedure. ♦ + ,j� City Council Minutes August 31, 1988 , Page 3 0 REAL ESTATE SIGNS (portable signs which are used basically on,weekends)t Mr. Mitchell, Chamber member, passed out some draft regulatins for ^� -m- tion. Mr. Buller suggested that we consider this item in the future since test Planning Commission had not considered it, and it would have to be advertised. ACTIONt It vu decided that staff look at this, gat input from the Cx:y Attorney regarding liability, and then have the Planning Commission condo, a public hearing. f f f NEON dIGNS: r, Mayor Stout explained that it was Council's approach to try this fir_t on a X rather conservative basis. It was felt that interior signs should be generic. Councilman Buquot expressed that there should be graphics included in the industrial neon signs. After some discussion, it was decided to allow graphic neon signs and to allow the increase in sine for such signs. Mayor Stout asked for a progress report of the above items at the September 21, 1988 meeting. f f f f f f C. AWOORNMENr The meeting adjourned at B105 p.m. Approved: f respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelat City Clerk August 17, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL M@IUIES Regular- Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular mooting of the City Council of the City of gaucho Cucamonga met on Wodnaaday, August 17, 1988, in the Lioc'a Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present vere Couneilmembera: Deborah N. Brow, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayer Denis L. Stout. Also present vere: City Manager, Lauren H. Wassermaai City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet7 City Attorney, James Markman; Assistant City Hanger, Jack Lam; City Planner, Brad Buller; Deputy City Planar. Otto Kroutill Senior Planner, Larry Henderson) Associate Planner, Scott Murphy; City Engiv or, Russ Maguire; Deputy City Engineer, Bill Silval Senior Civil Euginear, Barrye Hanson; Community Services Hauser, Joe Schultz; Senior Administrative Assistant, York R. Lorimer; Administrative Analyst, Diane O'Heali Administrativ% Assistant, Paula Pachon. Absent vas Councilmembert Charles J. Buquet I1. tar *a• B. ANNOUNWOKSTS/PKESBNTATIONS B1. Lauren Wwaarsen, City Manager, requested that Item 93 be cootinued to September 7, 1988. Since Councilman Buquet was how resting from a concussion, he had requested that Item's H4, C2, H2 and E3 be continued. Councilwoman Brow stated that she would not be present on September 7. 1988 and vented to hear Item E4 tonight. Jaws Markman, City Attorney, felt that it would be beat to ask the applicant. Harry Histen, attorney for Harry C's, stated that they mould be amenable to a continuance, but five veoks vould be too long. They would prefer to have it heard tonight. Mayor Stout stated that Item G2 was going to be referred to the Charter anyway. Item H3: because school starts on September 6, it was felt it should be heard this evening. Item 112: was continued. Mayor Stout asked if anyone was present for Item 83. There was no response. 7N City Council minutes August 17, 1988 Page 2 s MOTIONt Moved by King, seconded by Wright to continue Item E3 - ENVIROHMNTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL. MAP 9897 (MODIFIED) - WESTPRN PROPERTIES to September 7. Motion carried 4 -0-1 ( Absentt Buquet). rear Item G8t proposal to designate the Thomas House, 7980 Vineyard Avenue, as a historic landmark. HOTIONt Moved by Brow, seconded by King to continue Item C8 to September 7. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (Absents Buquet). rrrr B2. Presentation to Wayne Brow. Mayor Stout "de a presentation to Wayne Brow thanking him for his service to the community in conducting the City Survey. rrrrrr C. CONSENT CALENDAR �* Cl. Approval of Minutes: July 20, 1938 C2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 8/3/88 and 8/10/88, and Payroll ending 8/4/88 for the total amount of $2,423,789.68. t 4 C3. Approval to emend the Public Employees Retirement System Contract (00 188) to provide the increase in the 1959 Survivor Benefit provision. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) > RESOLUTION NO. 88.504 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C4. Approval to use temporary personnel for mapping update cervices during fiscal year 1988/89 in the amount of $15,000 to be funded from Contract Services Account Me. 33- 4130 -6028. (0502 -02 PERSONNEL) C5. Approval to confirm a City Council decision made on August 3, 1988 for on appeal of Planning Commission conditions relating to Environmental Assessment and Development Review 88 -03 - Smith. (0701 -06 APPEAL) RESOLUTION 50. 88 -505 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A DEVELOPNeUr City Council Minutes August 17, 1988 Page 3 REVIEW, NUMBER S8 -03, TO PERMIT A 20-UN TT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON 1.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUH -HICK RESIDENTIAL " DISTRICT AND LOCATED AT THE TERMINUSES OF SIERRA MADRE .e AVENUE AND HAM STREET - APB 207-251 -22 l 06. Approval to accept Offers of Dedication from ?areal Naps 479, 3534, and from the County of Snn Bernardino Book 8651, Pago 555 for Street, Highways and ` Related Purposes, offered as Hidgeviev Avenue (60 feet vide) a north /south street located vest of Haven Avenue and north of Hillside Road. (1002 -02 DEDICATION) RESOLUTION N0. 88 -506 A RESOLUTION Of THE' CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A 60 -FOOT DEDICATION 09 RIDGEVIEW AVENUE AS OFFERED FOR STREET, HIGHWAY AND RELATED PURPOSES L7. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Etivanda I Street Rehabilitation - Pee= Avenue, located off Victoria Street and coat of Etivanda Avenue, to be funded from Cos 'tar 2107 - Account No. 09 -4637- 8702 and the Etivanda II Street Rehabilitation Improvement Projectl Catalpa Street and cross streots, off East Avenua and south of Highland Avenue to be funded frw Cos 1" 2107 - Account He. 09- 4637 -8103 to be advertised as one project. (0601 -01 BID) ". OLIJIIOH NO. 88 -507 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BTIWABDA I STREET REHABILM%TIOH - PECAN AVENUE AND ETIMOIb`1 II STREET REHABILITATION - CATALPA STREET AND CROSS STREETS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ", IN SAID CITY AND AUTH0=IHG AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C8. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Ninth Street Rehabilitation Improvement Project, located between Vineyard Avenue and Baker Avenue to be funded from Gas I=, Account No. 09- 4637 -8815. (0601 -01 BID) EZSOLUIION NO. 88 -508 A RESOLUTION 07 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "NINTU STREET REHABILITATION ", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C9. Approval to award the Grove Avenue at 8th Street and Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railroad crossing Improvement Project to Vance Corporation for the City Council Hi=Les ' August 17, 1988 Page 4 amount of $183,626.n0 to be funded from System Development Fund, Account go. 22- 4637 -8751, F.A.O. Sect. 3, Account No. 17- 4637 -8776, and TDA, Article 8, Account No. 12- 4637 -8783. (0601 -01 BID) CIO. Approval to award the Replacement of White Alder Trace (tract 11934) Improvement Project vast of Victoria Park Lane and north of Southern Pacific Railroad to Steven Schultz Company, Incorporated, for the amount of $37,458.00 to be funded froze Lands Ape Maintenance District No. 2 - Account No. 41 -4130- 8769 with a loan from Beautification Foods. (0601 -01 BID) C11. Approval to declare as surplus a 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass, and an Elgin Sweeper, and authorize the sale of the vehicles tLrough public auction. (0604- 02 SURPLUS PROP) C12. Approval .o "cents ameadaeat to contract (85 -085) for Code Enforcement Representative, Joe Torres. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) C13. Approval to award and execute standing professional service agreements with J. P. Kapp and Associates (CO 88 -131)0 Sackett and Kranaer Surveying, Incorporated (CO 88 -132), and Associated Rngineera, Incorporated (CO 88 -133), for design and construction surveying staking, not to exceed $6,000.00 per design or construction survey project, and with Schaefer Dixon Associates, Incorporated (CO 88 -134) and Ricbsrd Mille Associates, Incorporated (CO 88 -135) for design and construction @oils and materials testing, not to exceed $3,000.00 for each design or coustructioa testing project. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) C14. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -136) for the Sapphire Trail Landecaping and Reconstruction Improvement Project South of Banyan Street awarded to Joe Hale Construction Company for the amount of $89,800 ($81,596 plus 10: contingency) to be funded from eeautifieatiom Fund, Account No. 21 -4n47 -8723. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) CIS. Approval to execute agreement (GO b8 -137) for contract services with McAllister for cemputer system development in the &=out of $5,000 to be funded from contract services Account No. 33- 4130 -6028. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) C16. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -138) for computer oft -sita storage with Datavault in the amount of $2,400 to be funded frou contract services Account No. 33 -4130 -5028. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) C17. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 4 (CO 87 -21) for Professional So-vices Agreement with Norris- Repke, Incorporated, to perform design administration services for various projects. It is taco. waded to expand their contract by $22,636.45 for the Cucamonga Storm Drain, Phases I and I1, Hellman Storm Drain, AD 82 -1 and Church- Hemoea Storm Drain projects, to bring their contract total to $109,111.20 to be paid from project funds indicated on said Change Order. (0602 -01 CONr AMEN) e'8 Approval of Contract Change Order No. 3 (CO 87-20) with Don Greek and Associates for additional and coatinotng design administration, Coltrane City Council Minutes August 17, 1988 Page 5 coordination, and plan cbecking services for 0e Foothill Boulevard /I -15 Interchange Modification Project. The amount of this Change Order is $$9,,000.00, bringing the total of the contract to $18,500.00. (0602 -01 CONT C19. Approval to release Improvement Agreement and Improvement and Improvemenc Security submitted by Luther Alkbageh, approved by City Co-mail on May 20, 1987, and Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security, cubmitted by Jung Hwang 6 Soma Real Estate Partnership for Tract 10246, located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue. (0602 -01 AGREE R I) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -509 A RESOLUTION OF TO CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, MnOVENEt r SECURITY FOR TRACT 10246 C20. Approval of Yap, execution of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13825, located east of Hermosa Avenue, ewth of Finch Avenue, submitted by lot Nationwide Network Mortgage Company. (1002 -09 MAP FINAL) (0602 -01 AGREE IMPS) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -510 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAHCHC CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF 'TRACT NO. 13025 C21. Approval to execute Im,aoveamat Agreement and Improvement Security for CUP 84 -34 (Hod.), located on the northeast comer of Bade line Road and Carnelian Avenue, submitted by MBUJ Properties. (0602 -01 AGREE. IMPR) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -511 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCUO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMP40VEYENT AGREEMENT AND IHPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 64 -34 (MOD.) C22. Approval to establish coaditicas for prepayment and satisfaction of the special tax applicable to the Day Creek ro nity Facilities District No. 84 -1 and approval of prepayment by the . to of California, Department of Transportation on Parcel Noe. 8197 and 8198 in the total amount of $109,248.34. (0401 -03 DAY CK AD) RESOLUr10N NO. 88 -512 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY CF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, SPECIFYING CONDITIONS 501. THE ■ City Council hinutes August 17, 1908 Page S PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY MOTION: Moved by Xing, seconded by Brow to approvo the Coaseu: Calendar as submitted. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (Abs -int: Buquat). D1. rrrrr4 D. CONSENT ORDINAXCXS ORDINANCE NO. 280 -A (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF ?.HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 16.49.030 (A, AND 16.49.040 (A) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO TIM PROCESSING OF VESTING TENTATIVE NAPS City Clerk Authelet read the Title of Ordinance No. 280-,1. NOTION: Moved by Xing, seconded by Wright to vaive full reading of the Ordinance end adopt said Ordinance. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (Absent: Buquet), r r r r r r E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARIN S E1 G1 neon and vindov signs. (To be continued to September 210 1988 reeting.) (0807 -02 SIGNS) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being c response, the public hearing vas closed. ORDINANCE NO. 358 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 8b -02, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO LItCAHONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR :LEON AND WINDOW SIGNS AND ADDING 22OVISION FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS FOR CITY SPONSORED SPECIAL EVENTS MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Xing to continue this item to September 7. Motion carried 4 -0-1 ( Absont: Suquet). City Council Minutes -" ` August 17, 1986 Page 7 a E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AID TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10911 - a4uyai — eppaa♦ oz cat zaaunzag w®zvaaw zuyuarcmcua au.. .i ... ...... nz improvements to 8th Street, 2) undergrounding of existing overhead utllities, : aad 3) in -lieu fees for future undergrounding of existing overhead •.ailroad ecmmunication lines for a subdivision of 18.28 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Central Industrial Development District, subarea Ho. 3, located,betwten 7th and 8th Streets, east of Hellman Avenue - APR 209- 171 -58. Staff report ,1 presented by Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer. (1002 -09 MAP PARCEL) (0701- 06 APPEAL) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council veal Hr. Rahn, Routan and Tuckar, attorneys for Mr. McDonald, who requested the ap appeal be sustained and the conditions be deleted. i" Bruce McDonald, Golden West Equity, applicant and developer of the property adjacent to this property. Hr. McDonald stated that the problem vas there o' was not any allowance for reimbursement from the adjacent property which was owed by the railroad. i' 0- There being no further public response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. a Councilman Ring expressed agreement with the Planning Commission's policy, but there were other places where this had not been done, and felt this was a difficult situation. He agreed with Mr. McDonald on the issues of widening the street and landscaping, but did not agree with him on the undergrounding and in- lieu fees. Councilwoman Brow stated that she felt the developer should not have to improve the whole north aide of the street and felt some type of reimbursement should be considered. Councilwoman Wright agreed with the undergrounding and iw,lieu fees, but also agreed with Councilman King regarding the full street widening and lrndscaping. Mayor Stout felt this was a largu project and there were other projects which hod similar problems where there wouli not be reimbursement. He felt the appeal should be denied. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brow to deny the appeal as it relates to the undergrounding issue. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (Absent: Buquet). MOTION: Moved by Brow, seconded by Wright to deny the appeal as it relatee to the full street width issue. Motion carried 3 -1 -1 (No: King. Absent: Buquet). MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Stout to deny the appeal as it relates to the landscaping issue. Motion carried 3 -1 -1 (No: Ring. Absent: Buquet). ACTION: Council directed staff to draft a resolution for the next agenda confira,log these aotions. City Couoril Hinutes August 17, 1988 .rCe Page 8 " 7 _ E3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENr AND TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP 9697 (MODIFIED) - NBSTERN PROPERTIES - Appeal of the Planning Commission decision requiring a mediao Island within Terra Vista Parkway for a subdivision of 17.09 acres of land into 3 parcels in the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vint* Parkway - APN 1070 - 421 -06, 1077 -091 -17. (Continued to September 7, 1963). (0701 -06 APPEAL) (1002 -09 NAP PARCEL) 9 A A e U. ENTERTAINMENr PERMIT 87 -01 - BARRY C'S - Appeal of the Planning Commission decision to modify Eater:ainment Permit 87 -01 for ■ restaurant /night club at 10877 Foothill Boulevard. Staff report by Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner. James Markmac, City Attorney, stated for the record that this item consisted of pages 137 through pages 241 of the agenda packat dated August 17, 1988; and a letter from Mr. Elston dated August 15, 1988 to the Mayor and members of the City Council, consisting of aaveu pages with a ="age attachment. He Luther stated that there were three options before City Councilt (1) they could revoke the pormit, (2) take no action, or (3) suspend the permit. (0203 -05 EMT PERMIT) Captain Eugene Ciimore, Sheriff's Department, responded to some questions of Councitwman Brown that the situation at Harry C's was unique. There were some problem at the Cm-girl Saloon, but nothing like they were experiencing at Barry C's. Lloyd Almond, Foothill Fire District, stated there were no other restaurants at this time with this type of problem. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council water Harry Histan, Attorney for Barry C's, outlined the problems that they had experienced in the past. Harry Chan, owner of Barry We, stated that before the Public Safety Commission meeting they had a different type of entertainment. Chief Almond presented some slides of violations at Harry C's with Vera Author, Foothill Fire Protection District, narrating. (Mir. Elston objected to the shoving of the slides since they were taken on Sunday afternoon and had nothing to do with the entertainment permit.) Jim Barton, 10621 Civic Center Drive, stated that no one has denied that exits were blocked or there were problem; what Council is dealing with though, is a persons right to run a business. Hr. Histen stated the crowd is different now and the business is down $50,000 a month. There being no further public response, Mayor Stout clnsed the public hearing. Y City Council Hiautei,"`�i; August 17, -1908 Page. 9 eaafaa Mayor Stout called a recess at 9tOO p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9157 p.m. with all webers of Council present (Absent: Buquat). area» Brad Buller, City Planner, responded to some questions regarding maintenance and explained that he had been involved with this prior to Mr. Kroutil's involvement, and they had Led some problem from the beginning. Mr. Markman stated the Ordinance refers to live entertainment. He pointed out we do not regulate anything which is not live, ouch as television, and pointed out the Planning Commission resolution approved on Juan 24, 1987 is very specific about shat it permits. Councilman King felt that the Planning Commission came up vith the appropriate solution. Councilwoman Brow fait tb Planning Commission and Public Safety Commission were too lenient. She did not feel 120 days were sufficient, but would like to entertain a 6 -month period with annual r#uevals. Mr. Markman responded that what you are making for is a periodic staff report for update. You cannot keep bringing this before Council miss# you ♦ant to revoke, suspend, or modify the condition. Councilwoman Wright agreed in upholding the Planning Comission's decision and denying the appeal. MOTIONS Moved by King, seconded by Wright to deny the appeal and upheld the Planning Commission's decision. Y .ion carried 4 -0-1 (Absents Buquet). e ee♦ E5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AlDDi1)MEN1 ae-Vn - U11I tae RANCRO CUCANONGA - An amendment to Title 17, Chapter 17.08, of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing minimum required sires for multi - family dwellings. 9taff report by Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner. (0203 -03 DC AMEN) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City C'.erk Autbelet read the title of Ordinance No. 366. ORDINANCE NO. 366 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE 0° THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, NHiNDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.08, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOHGA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING MINIMUM REQUIRED SIZES kOR MULTI- YAMILY DWELLINGS City '.ouncil minutes+ August 17, 1988 Page 10 NOTIONS Moved by Xing, seconded by Wright to waive full reading of said Ordinance and set second reading for September 71 1988., Notion carried 4 -0-1 (Absents Buquet). r 5 iM Sea E6. eaaa wa can wu•wta,wmra - An anatument to the lndestrial 8pee if c Plan, xpanding the boundaries of Subarea I (General Industrial) to include portine v of the area an the South aide of Arrow Route, between Hallman and Vineyard, currently located In Subarea 2 (General Industrial). Modification of permitted and couditionally, permitted uses may also be considered. Staff report by Otto Xroutil, Deputy City Planner. (0203 -05 70 AMEN) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public bearing. Shere being no response, the public hearing vas closed. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 367. ORDINANCE NO. 367 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -01 EXPANDING TIM BOUNDARIES OF SUBAREA 3 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) TO INCLUDE PORTIONS OF THE AREA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, BETWEEN HELLMAN AND VINEYARD, CUdRENfLY LOCATED IN SUBAREA 2 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) ?M.'ONs Moved by Xing, seconded by Brow to waive full reading of said Ordnance and set second reading for September 7, 1988. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (Absents Buquet). e * e E7. v wwnvmn - a request co amens Figure ] -ie or tBe Etivanda specific Plan pertaining to Community Trails. Staf2 report by Scott Hurphy, Associate Planner. (020: -05 ESP AMEN) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public bearing. Addressing Council vast Patrick Maguire who stated he supported the change. There being no further public reoponsu, Mayor Stout eloseu rho public bearing. City Clerk Authalet read the title of Ordinance N.,. 368. ORDINANCE 90. 368 (first reedinb) a-*, ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CDUtaCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING EYIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN City'Council minutes August 17, 1988 Page 11 AMENDMENT 88 -03, AMENDING FIGURE 5 -18 PERTAINING TO COMNUMETY TRAILS NOTIONS Moved by Ring, seconded by Wright to valve full reading of said Ordinance and set second reading for September 7, 1988. Notion carried 4 -0-1 (Abseutt Buquat). E8. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENS AND ETIWAHDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to attend the Etivanda Specific Plan to establish a consistent wall derign and satback for East Avenue. Staff report by Scott Murphy, Associate Planner. (0203 -05 ESP AMEN) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public bearing. Addressing Council vast _ Patrick Maguire expressed that the wall should be build out of R -wall. There being no further public responses Mayor Stout closed the public bearing. City Clerk Autbalat read the title of Ordinanen No. 369. ORDINANCE N0. 369 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAXONCA, CALIFORNIA, A.'PROVIIIC ETIWAN13A SPECIFIC PLAN AIffiHDMENT 88 -02, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A CONSISTENT WALL DESIGN AND SETBACK FOR EAST AVENPS MOTION: Moved by Kiug, seconded by Stout to waive full reading of said Ordinance and set second reading for September 7, 1988. Hart= carried 4 -0-1 (Abawt: Buquet). E9. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 88 -02B - FIRST CITY PROPERTIES AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - (1) A request to &Maud the Circulation Elemant of the General Plan to widen Cherry Avenue from the intersection of 24th ' Strent (Summit Avenue) to Interstate 15 from a Collector Street to a Secondary Arterial; and to designate as special design streets the above portion of Cherry Avenue, as well as, 24tb Street between the Loop Road and Cherry Avenue, and the Loop Road. Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Senior Plauner. (0203 -03 GP AMEN) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council vas: Diane Netham, Hunter's Ridge, pointed out it was their intent to put in the trail at this time. There being no further public response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. City Council Minutes August 17, 1988 Page 12 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -513 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCII, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CZNERAL PLAN AMlMH3NT 88-OZB AMEUDING THE CIRCULATION ELEHRUr OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO WIDEN CHERRY AVENUE FROM 24TH STREET (SUMMIT AVENUE) TO INTERSTATE 15 FROM A COLLECTOR STREET TO A SSCONMRY ARTERIAL AND TO DESIGNATE AS SPECIAL DESIGN STREETS BETWEEN THE LOOP ROAD AND CHERRY AVENUE, AND THE LOOP ROAD (EXHIBIT 1) "7 MOTIONt Moved by Wright, seconded by Brow to approve Resolution No, 88 -513. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (Absentt Buquet). A. P RIC. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -01 - FIRST CITY PROPERTIES AND CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMAYCA - A request to amend tha 8[iwnda Specific Plan 1 to widen Cherry Avenue from the intersection of 24tb Street (Summit Avenue) to Interstate 15 from A Collector Street to a Secondary Arterial$ and to designate as special design streets the above portion of Cherry "• Avenua, and the Loop Road) and (2) to amend the trails sup to relocate a portion of the equestrian trail to the north side of 24th Street (Summit Avenue) and to delete a portion along 24th Street between Cherry Avenue to the Eastern Boundary of the City and to extend the bicycle trail on the south side of 24th Street from East Avenue to the eastern boundary of the City. Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Senior Planner. (0203 -05 ESP AMEN) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk read the title of Ordinance No. 370. ORDINANCE NO 3 1 (first resdinC) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND BTIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -01 TO WIDEN CHERRY AVENUE FROM 24TH STREET (SUMMIT AVENUE) TO INTERSTATE 15 FROM A COLLECTOR STREET TO A SECONDARY ARTERIAL AND TO DESIGNATE AS SPECIAL DESIGN STREETS THR ABOVE PORTIOR OF CHERRY AVENUE, AS WELL AS 24TH STREET BETWEEN THE LOOP ROAD AND CHERRY AVENUE, AND THE LOOP ROAD (EXHIBITS 1 AND 2)$ AND TO AMEND THE TRAILS MAP TO RELOCATE A PORTION OF THE EQUESTRIAN TRAIL TO THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET (SUMMIT AVENUE) AND TO DELETE A PORTION ALONG 24TH STREET ARTWERN CHERRY AVENUE AND THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE CITY AND TO EXTEND THE BICYCLE TRAIL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET FROM EAST AVENUE TO THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE CITY (EXHIBIT 3) Y r err' i� ti Al t:- F a d w r City Council minutes August 17, 1988 Page 13 MDTIONt Moved by Brow, seconded by Xing to waive full reading of said Ordinance and set second reading for September 7, 1988. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (Abseatt Buquet). e a * a * 7. PUBLIC BRAMCS Fl. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no responset the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 21-C. ORDINANCE NO. 11-C (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CII COON' I OF THE f" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMEND= C SECTION 5..0.150 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO BUSINESS LICENSES= LATE PAYMBNr PENALTIES MDTIONt Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to waive full reading of said Ordinance and set second reading for September 7, 1988. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (Abaantt Buquat). * * * * F2. CONSIDERATION OF FORMATION OF RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING ONLY DISTRICrS WITHIN THE CITY - Adding Chapter 10.50 to Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to provide for the establishment of permit parking districts as designated by City Council. (Continued from August 3, 1988 meeting) Staff report presented by Lauren Wasserman, City manager. (1163 -01 PX 6 TRAF) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no resppnsc the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 39-C. ORDINANCE NO. 39-C (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.50 TO TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISEENr OF PERMIT PAREINU DISTRICTS HOIION: Moved by WriCht, seconded by Ring to waive full reading of said Ordinance. Nation carried 4 -0-1 (Absenti Buquet). '.} n�.e'1 E�9 _4e•�v a. �S'= :�-:': _ =35.: ��.a ro .va City Council Minutes _ August 17, 1988 Page 14 MDTIOMt Moved by Wright, seconded by Stout to set second reading for September 7, 1988. Motion carried 3 -1 -1 (Not Ling. Absent: Buquet). ' a * :♦ Y3. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public bearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 371. ORDINANCE NO. 371 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCUO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.22 ENTITLED "PROHIBITION OF CBLOROYLDOROCARAON PROCESSED FOOD PACKAGING" NOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Stout to waive full reading of said Ordinance and set second reading for October S, 1988. Notion carried 4 -0-1 (Absent: Buquet). e # e f x x C. CITY MANAGER'S STAMP RKPORTS v G1. AMENDMENTS TO FIREWORKS BALES SLICISILIYY LIST - Consideration of amendments to the Fireworks Sales Eligibility List which identifies those community service organizations authorized to sell fireworks. Staff report presented by Mark Lorimer, Senior Administrative Assistant. (1302 -09 FIREW03L) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Ted Favor, Rancho Cucamonga Pony Colt League. A representative for Etiwanda High School Band Boosters. John Jacque, Rancho Grande Liwanis Club. There being no further public response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. ACTION: Council concurred in apprcaing the list, including the churches; directing staff to come back with an Ordinance with guidelines for new organizations and how the money should b& spent; and noting that violators will be taken off the list. a s i a as City Council Minutes - August 17, 1988 Page 15 C2. CITY-WIDE SMOKING ORDIHACCE - Kecommandation from the,Advisory Comiasion to consider an Ordinance permitting smoking in certain facilities and areas in the City. (1403-00 ENVIRON) ACTION: Council concurred in setting October 19, 1988 for consideration of this item. M e e f G3. COMMUNICATIONS FROM TdE PUBLIC WATER PRESSURE NORTH OF BANYAN STREET. Staff report prevented by Lauren Aassorman, City Manager. 1204 -00 WATER) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public response. Addressing Council were: Bob Neufeld, President of Cucamonga County Later District, expressed that issues regarding water needed to be presented to the Cucamonga County Water Boards not the City Council. Emmette Poeeys 8326 Orchard Streets stated thty had addressed the Water Board and requested a building moratorium until the District replaced the voter main. Nothing had bean done, rn,d they were now requesting to be heard by the City Council. Don Hines, 5606 Vinemor, stated there vas act even enough water pressure to fight fires. Lloyd Michaels Ceneral Manager of Cucamonga County Water District, answered basic questions from the Council. Dennis Micheal, fire Chiefs responded to Council's questions regarding a recent fire in that area and the water pressure problems. Christine Lombardo, 8290 Orchards urged Council's assistance. Han Moore, 8323 Orchard, also urged Council's assistance. Councilwoman Brown asked if the City could hirr someone to do an independent water survey for that particular area? Mr. Markman responded, "yes ", the City could adependently undertake doing a survey. The Water District's records are lik. the City's, however, and are open to the ccrutiny of any interested party. Councilwoman Wright expressed it was the intent of the people in bringing this to the Council to aake sure that the development which is occurring would not further impact the water pressure. They requested a moratorium. However, if there is a method ve can get the information from the Water District that development in the City bas adequate water pressure, then we should do so. City Council minutes August 17, 1988 Page 16 M Councilwoman Brow pointed out that the Water District had stated they would like as opportunity to speak with the residents further. It might be prudent for the parties to get together to discuss this matter after tonight's discussion. Residents have come to Council and said they, needed belp: She would not want to discount an independent water study to see, if in fact, our citizens are being taken care of, nor did she want to push that responsibility for fire protection on to other elected boards. Regardless, the City, staff should come back with a report to see if Council needed to take further steps. Mr. Wasserman suggested that this item be referred to the Water District and to City staff to investigate the system and how it vorkq and bring the item back to Council on September 21, 1988. In the interior, the City will work with the Water District so we can understand their problems. ACTIONS Council directed that an overview of the review process for the City, Water District and Fire District be completed as to bow it all fits together. Alen, to monitor projects that are going through the process now and bow other areas in the City are affected. 04. REPORT 07 MAINTENANCE COST FOR WINDROW TREES - Staff will present a report on the cost of maintaining windrow trees. Continued to September 21, 1988. t +frf ,�• G5. USE Of CONDEMMITION TO OBTAIN OFF -SITS RIGHTS- OF -WAT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13812 - PULSAR - A staff request for City Council direction concorning the use of possible condemnation proceedings to obtain off -site Street rights-of-why associated with the development of a proposed tentative tract located on the n north aide of Highland Avenue vest of Etiwanda Avenue. Any or all costs for condemnation will be born by the developer - APN 225 - 161 -35, 36, 37, 38, 55, 56, 61 and 225- 171 -1, 9, 10, 17. Staff report presented by Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer. (1002 -05 EM DOMAIN) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Thera being no response, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by Brow, seconded King to approve in concept. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (Absent: Buquat). + f f f C5. A PROPOSAL TO DESIG'IATE THE "CROSSWBLL HOUSE ". 9874 ARHOV HIGHWAY, AS A LANDMARK - A mall, Spanish eclectic -style house built in 1934 recommended to be incorporated in the site plan of a proposed condominium development. Staff report presented by Arlene Banks, Associate Planner. (1402 -06 HISTORY) I :ity Council Minutes August 17; 1988 Page 17 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -514 e, :q•x A HHSOLOTIOH OF THE CITY COUNCIL 08 THE Cl2Y 08 RANCHO y( CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE ,p.` 9874 ARROW HIGHWAY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A LANDMARK YACTION: Council concurred -in referring item back to the Historic Freservation Commission for information on -why it should be designated as a historic landmark n' and for further clarification. 34, A, A, 07. A PROPOSAL SO DESIGNATE THE R46E8D3 HOU96, 7201 AMETHYST AVENUE, AS A POINT ,t•- 08 HISTORIC INTEREST - A craftsman - influenced, single family house in 'old" l Alta Loma that was once a Nazarene Church on Archibald Avenue. Staff report presented by Arlene Banks, Associate Planar. (1402 -06 HISTORY) ,�• RESOLUTION NO. 88 -515 t A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE ROBERDS HOUSE, 7201 AMETHYST AV-Z- ) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST h MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 88 -515. Motion carried 3 -1 -1 (No: King. Absents Buquet). xaa C8. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE. 7980 VINEYARD AVENUE. AS A LANDHABR- A small bungalow built and owed by the Thomas Family on a vita proposed for an office building. Item continued to September 7, 1988. (1401 -06 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -516 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE, 7980 VINEYARD AVENUE AS A LANDMARK a x x x C9. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE SITE OF THE ETIWANDA GROB PRODUCTS COMPANY. 9370 ETIKLNDA AVENUE, AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST - A family -owned winery on the site of a future wastewater reclamation plant. Staff report .seanted by Arlene Banks, Associate Planner. (1402 -06 HISTORY) City Council,Ninute_s� August 17, 1988 - Page 18 RESOLUTION MO. 88 -517 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of TEe CITY OF BANCEO CUCAMONGA, : ALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PROPOSAL TO DESIGHATE THE - SITE OF THE EYIWANDA GRAPE PRODUCTS COMPANY AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST NOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brow to approve Resolution No. 88 -517. Notion carried 4 -0-1 (Abseutt Buquet). w A, * w 010. report Councilwoman Wright requested that a letter which she received from Sevin Ranker, Co- Pre3ident of the Alto Loma Friday Hite Live, be included in the record. ACTION: Letter van received and filed with the record. City Clerk Authalet read the title of Ordinance No. 372 and urgency measure. ORDINANCE NO. 372 (URGENCY) 5 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 9.18.015 TO THE RANCHO CUCANONCA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROHIBITION OF UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY UPON CERTAIN PRIVATELY OWNED LANDS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF MOTIONS Moved by Wright, seconded by Stout to waive full reading of said Ordinance and to adopt. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (Absents Buquet). MOTION? Moved by Stout, seconded by Wright to approve the memorandum of undervtanding pertaining to the allocation of public safety responsibilities and resources for Cucamcoga Carvon. Motion carried 4-C -1 Wsents Buquet). w w w w Gil. SSLECTION OF ONE COUNCILMEMEER TO SIT ON SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL PARR REQUEST F02 PROPOSALS RFP S . (0701 -01 0OH11ITTER) ACTION: Mayor Stout was selected as the meebor of Council to sit on the Selection Committee. • w w r; City Council minutes r August 17, 1988 Page 19 # C12. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -518 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO s, CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING sa EXECUTION OF CERTAIN LEASE FINANCING DOCUMENTS, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION OF A PURCHASE AGREEMENT, APPROVING THE FORM AND AUTHORIZING THE DISTRIBUTION OF A PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFERING AND SALE OF CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION RELATING THERETO, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH RESPECT ' THERSTO MOTION: Paved by Stout, seconded by Brow to approve Resolution No. 88 -518. Motion carried 4 -0-1 (Absent: Buquet). # #tt G13. CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL Of TERRA VISTA COIMUNITY PARKS - 1) LA MISSION AND 2) FIVE ACRE CITY PARR PLUS ADJACENT 4.1 ACRE YMCA SM. Staff report presented by Joe Schultz, Co ®unity Services Managers (1404 -06 PK DEVEL) MOTIONt Moved by Stout, aecouded by Brow to approve the concepts. Notion carried 4 -0-1 (Absent: Buquet). R. COUNCIL BUSIY H1. SELECTION OF INDIVIDUAL TO FILL THE UNEXPIRED TERN ON TIM PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION - A vacancy created by the resignation of David Barker, term 7 17/87 t.T. (0701 -01 APOLNT PSC) WTION: Hovel by Stout, seconded by Ring to approve the recomeecdation by the Eubco ®ittee to appoint Elvira West. Notion carried 4 -0-1 (Absents Buqutt). • t t t H2. DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATE FOR LEAGUE ANNUAL COhFBRENCE. Itm continued to a future meting. # t t r H3. CONSIDERATION FOR ALLOWING STUDENT PARKING, BY PERMIT, IN THE PARKING LOT AT PED HILL PARK - A report of the City Council Subconaittee regardiug Alta Lome High School Student Parking in the Red Hill Co ®unity Park parking lots. Staff report presented by Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer. (1163 -01 PE 6 TRAP) (1404 -05 PARR) Approveds * (D Is -% (� City Councit Hio,2e._{ August 17, 1988 Page 20 - =IUNI xuved by King"secouded by Stout to approve student parking at the puk. Notion carried 4-0-1'(Absenti Su4iait). a a a I. "ngrupreiTion oy rum Pat mm mmn None submitted. a f a a a a J. CDNNMC&TIONS IWX THE PUBLIC Home submitted. a AWOURKHM HDTION& Moved by King, seconded by Brown to adjourn to s closed session regarding pending litigation under the name of Revard. Closed session to adjourned to a joint meeting on August 31, 1988 at 5:30 p.m. at Lion's Park Community Center with the Chamber of Commerce regarding the Sign Ordinance. Meeting adjourned at 1130 a.m. Respectfully submitted$ Beverly A. Authelat City Clark Approveds * (D Is -% (� ZEE ir--- WS E s :3 9 ts il ri aY -•:iYY ri,- fib•,;". i`! -'`':l sir- .�".., i- - _ �.',.�� : c:.rt• fsE " .J -ippr ..33.�..bss'- e_.R`•�.¢ 7t E■ A _ ■e I5_■ sg gg - '- , .i gJ•.%.. 89 a 85zn a3 9 0d3Sy �i 59c i��a °� �8Y5 8E ig �_"��Y',sp�.i aeL ;ti4 's <._ �. � _ ~� ��rs.'.•i.s'a, a�131� 914111 @8� ��9 »eQR�kRI1'affiiPa.. E9aM9 ^IF�Aa��`R -va aXq!� F��aaaa�saaa�! �tir �Alf� 1,311 11H. # a Vill A ° `i• S �a�Saia a @a�aSaaaa 5Mm aa= aaaa IIsa' a :a's :aaFi�- ss's"si- saa :'s'ssF's `s'a L's's 3E'sisa3fi9�_F ssixa ss: sass'' sz �essz s sazssssssasszasssasssa :yessssas r »rr »r �. -- rrr ^rr »t. »rrt ». • +rrr�rr rr +:•. r-, $ 5ff' nn@ 3f- ssDFF{l D�@ D@{ ipFi .K868F69 @si6S5 @zifi�FBC &3Sl�iE rr »rr »rr »rr�rr ++ rrr.. rrrrr» rrrr �. r. »•• ffisaemF: ��FgF�n�an�ii��a�aFFu80 @FFnL =�l4CgifSd63ilff6 rr» r» rr �. _rr r» » ^rr'v» rrr »rrrrr. -• £ 3.? 3.- a6n3�n= 8 =95�EF90 §S6F8�9H °HF�:BSSB @�d5$C s32 °e_E2[ ?aF €s3sPg .T3EIIG�= LLCgSE:nAY�G.�Z�C�G., F.0 �9i��Y��,�y„yCLCL�tlG 11-ft y 'J Cf •7 a_• a r3� g 3 �I L� as 7 3' W P�1 xq a all if! Vai D III -mill ; 0 Ujiiffl m 3R 191111111i :7, Jill Mali _10 63 Russ -skskasks rc':1 I 1PUMPAM-1) MAIM EAPP - xz=882338 SIZZ 6981xieksts pr V�rjirjvv 11i"T 99 Egg 91 &H piago 61 a MIS 99 ad 1115rig 9Y of X1 V�er�e , r a U-993EE6 E29 ZE =ggg gli 55R.ESWE3s 9 t t r till q I I pill 7Ca tat OF 2E: ! $$$ sits 3,9 £ sa . rrr °_Yap rrr 99� rrr Ea5 .ca M 5 z E # s ffi 3 s g i p q r G �a��g89��R8�a�89HeK��iEga= 338��'s 9. � a E 2 gEec --Eaa�r sc' E�eP =sE i _5S5aaaaa X32 5a5 5��a ��55�i� F 8i2iiaia2ia 3jr. aiiiiaaaiiYaii iaai s asaasassaiaastssaiasaai Satisssssaa -c sat- iiiiss -s sai -sa -s isaii- saasai -sai -s i�si w trit s#'tsksa sxa#3as2s9s## cgs ' s€a# asks swksktaaEisass k 's iia- its - -aa -s sits ssa _ -s eassaasi -ssaa -its -i saiiasai 5is95 3n5ii5 Nos BE2f�n 3351FssOS99253 rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. rr -rrrrr -rrr El iii2$$ 55ti57S!$$$it59i125$- st3i$3Slt$ rrr E a`3i395�n3c5'a�Li ?E n3 130 19E- at6£oa HIg- :sa -c� s�cg -a gsara INHH5�3355 3 ia5�a3 a1o" 331,715; n i -aii'i iigycicacossa9�g5Ya'J a$�i i�3 n= fla'as 11 C, s� a} e � s s` , s . a a'J f =a 2 Ci s as ea ;a. t M 3 Y i ic a tl 12 I MUM ii. Willi! s2 s.'n�es,,: i �asnynEas s sssssa a� ss' '-56a 3'i3F£�si4_ -a_>£1 i 3 'VHF i. €HY�H3# s s a 6cap, 's >sas sssss sssasas 's 'ss V9 gds- d ?I ## P j asaaaaee sssss a a a 5$@i s a 1199 1!i s r r Lipp n rspp =rrrr i 4 a r r r +rr ksss r a i Milli I r� A3 W'. IIF - Al Qr .5. A. ti Rv I [a I fill floglillij rirrrp 22 Ila v x 9 n a a =I P1 1 149 all �r k S�xk it 2 er . s I r r R 92 ;1 a is 9 k 9 ■F /! } {I �� 991E | ' | ■ � f . |� $� | , $ |§ % ?q| .| ;! / ' �` | | ! ■! || /! } {I �� 991E | ' | ■ � f . |� $� | , $ |§ % ?q| .| ;! / V i ao e ° ooM1roo m o nh n SYrho twPOno ao . C� = O e N ° Om +OOP �NNN00�0w0 N9hryN$m O O lQl • N , ONnf nO OYM POO Jnn aP °N G f i 1 1 � nn.. J JwN .• PN t 1 2 ' n nryn JN afpjl�OP.Oyp�ryn.Y.ppN,J�pp h- P°- N- JN- FOPO -rynf Y• O QI UigpYOVOVmiVOmOmOdmmiY00mmYm0 <i -112.02022M= aaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaJaJaaaaauaa Y C; ryryM1NNNNryNryryYNM1NNryNNryNryNryNNNNry NryryNryNryNNryN U 1 ffff M w o h PAP w OL W� mN\ of M � i < awtic r° � � •o. °w .rw ah.� � war. J ryQ s � W WQ iQn NW iQ <Qs 92 o�aS& i �{.J• ° z J �' s o oru ° °iW Of r1 .' .� ° °m °� 1 V V P y V 0p3t YywYY\ � Yyjy� ' 3E � < : M 2LOON "'Cp PO =RSn ytl G �W •^ ° � .°.• m Q.°..°. N.`Q Fn< °xb oo zQe u}t °p uQi �c < �VU ' W 4 �UyPPO Y J Cw 'tn 'jWm6N 61 6 2 O b LN6p666 N huyLlm>N %0 �.pIN61r� '� 1 r u J .Si Y Q.SiwUYf w6< ZSwf >M J VN'- 6 o� •^ a wAY44 .QJQ: uqw w Z Q TF.tW W� N OP Y•.OSQ {U• J o z h Q 22.�LLV ..aJ�y .ry�o'3' 'Z'w ulewJms 2 W b O 66•�mLJypfu= =yi ° �pvu..w •. Jm �.. Low sa � V Y Q Y 3 GUypeb rn VpYO.'irNl66.�wpJU w u v 2 Q yw •w S 2•W Z f Q N Z Z f l2� 2' w6 3 N w O O .. ON W.0 wupyi i0J9 N wQQ�J <N 0 u � � Q � w. hY bC N.��L•nwbe <�bLmr2Lr ''^ ' < u NI N o •QU Qu zaWwubm .. 1 0< •Y z :W Lhw Q.•JNW ..� awwN J J 1 U� u •1 C lVUYWS u <NVJi•Vi ~'6rnN.1.ShN�M% mo .• i + N o o a Qa �.. QOU s «r °<iisi ti pool�mmm<p ii N <. J �. T N ONJJJP O•.O OhnNmJOf wOnPnhwN aan rN nmNmm or hnJrw P 61 � •Ji .. .� m ��wmnw r P.nnwP.m. •.P wow P I 1 M1t s -. 0 0000mo of -m p a000n oNl -.�, F; 000 °o on oOOn w° oOCOOO O'N"- '},•��mO OO�n ^MaOOa�O +`O i'� 1 a,oMn n +nnN o ry � fia rrYra « «^`Nrnr$ aN•- Yaa�ononroN+'1 -eon a a P.m 1 OPm PYMnm «Jwww ^0= n N 1 nnP a nrr a ry n rr u o• � n n l � rvnaN anmPO n armPOrrvnrm al- �� «wnnYna •, oaoaM1 <aheeodryn ° &an lal °ntl °n n�°. ^na..rynn an°n 4 i•O «n «an o «� s ' s� W V Y n WiWWm r �2•• W M Jmt 2NLJ ,l o yynJ r `• r �• Q Q 1 maH YVMZ\ O N r Q° N Q ' a •'aiJuQiin Y •YQQQW4 a iJ 2 ' IZ^WWSi� nw�Gas=, 0 O m Oufi OY • YN SrnWr 2 •OOOOQ p Y NY V n Q F N6 j jrY YSJmW =WWYYYYU�° N{ U i•• U <V< Q �rfVn6 VN•"M<SfO2 2 <QQ�� 1 J � V u.ViO NW63aW UT �NrWW �SrLLLL2V Vry�p/.N a WNWIr pp pp ZW .O Lw M iw wWS'iNwOn i� <OV�YPUOW6 O m ^a W6NSf W Ja0 NY Jtil�mV �_ - QI -- Oei °O61mW NNtt J�JWN ( N' `� wWSO6ZVO m JU <>Y ` <tn��NJUrO4OT LLf mO f �L NPQUY r UrYOrVO, WNNr W Owri < •z irry <rlo, �w :s <f rtr oNLL3i �JWQwrJ} V 6JJ LLLL V; SYI°°<PNiOmf SVUi< °W�uni •Zirr QO�J 2 ii oNt< NHY�QV QrrN VJJ WW�({O JfJO WI wN fWN •ln•66JUJrOO6ftUVTj �Jt �NNO =�LOrNmN rl uW. iJr °�•�::Mm�iooWWs��'„�,iNro.J_. LL.z' <��'.Q'Caoni� ion u ` z e0 Ur <V G JtN N Nltittl >r=2 JV ' N W O•y J,., <mONN .^'W VVW s.Zi vViW „JQVy OIWwWn ��•' 6 VUWmtJr «'yu�W wOQ WuWp < �W2w°".Z~r Wu{ l SZ`WU �mr O OzV 'SULL�uW WO � WILNU W4< NLLNN Q r .J �J[ O Wm jf ZWf �NO>J YOUVV t'� }lW0 O••26N<JLLr<JfJ �.J•.Q.� °000�o -•i ou3Nlib oSc< �IWro �.. <NaooiWW °aW�r�am `yo <LL��WQL '� VNZrw J >r o azzzo •n uy�rV °WU� « � rN< }r<ZJJWVrJr JOWUUrVOO r LVp yW`�ae<szWWTZrsQi =.. iP „1"roWWJ o mLmmY33S3YYY�IVYYJ'•Y YOO <OC�OOWWYm ,i rr +rroPrmm�mmrN'- nnNnrm emPmnrermm�anPr aanP arNmm�raoam��n Vin• »^ ^fin n' ^ t •"or°- m�NmNmraomN p�rm sn��O nr•..n o • mn rrrNNr r•- "..°."r �t c n 2 a ' u z o a s i 4 a u< _ J ,naoopoFOpnoeaonNnnm0000enNpeoa0000000Par amoopon0000aPO ^OraY00000e +�oaNOOOOnoonnn± ��- �°. °ga. n.O °a°•°•.N.iiF.nn�r Nao+ p°S$.P. n•N..°.,+°• a n�PrggF °O �nm..�g�P f^ d Fw w F mP�rnn +aaFmPOwrynraaNOPOrnn +aaFaP n +aaF nnn•.n nnnn ++ +rr + + +rranmNaaaanaScaaaaaa aeea. Papa <Pae <PaaPaai <PaPaaoPaaeP•$a Pa °a Pa oaa<Pa Pa Pa aa<aa NNM1NMryNNNM1NryM1M1M1 NNNNNNNNnNNNNNNNNNNM1NNNNM1N Lw WW F JNW p J NW aW •. 2 � m ti �uVi r� Jw � r w w wFP wOm '� •w m OL^• 1 < uaa W Q� Wro JQa <W TJ SQ -all zFm a iL a8` Q 1 wS1F r•N•N Or 2 F6 O•,m�rY�YnT,, m � CQ \Y�S1� O r0p Ou 6Y O SJ° ° °z•iuuz3r O u u 0�u� uF WU m��uyWUOeuL� N�a tiNWi�u y K`6aN� ja S U ,3 Yw wWMQ 'far «60 L 2 .� < awuus� i iNi�n N _ _ � r0 67d <` 6 YO mmOVNryN 03SQ�0 VNr02p1O0 =r6 ° W= QF \r - Y FH<0m •A -ry 0M Q j pyi ••°'�J •6w y6y LNw Qm Wi0°�mW ` O - J N 61 tI Ntw °N•°•SOL VO�YM1• N7a[6N„ N.6 WQJ WXJJ2w °r NI N 2 < •2 wW\rNWN V e ° «Y\ P ,2 OV1`Iy{ S<6W�6 fJPL<W°i<F '2` tmFFm =w `JwLWJ O V. QyQSryW mZjrwuF.Wm <WTVy °i NSU Ugg Nsyu'0 ,nJrW��W �• c oo: oz o�JUJ .<T m °.`.em u+°. i azipriwSR u a7gjzz.n 7iiJ>�J ��u.W6 2L 0J � °WWW�<d�J°NOL ww6�60�6rUp�6pN 6.0inf 6°M•='•6 U�M TJJU`ir0•�r•`^NtNY Q6 D6 v W W =N N -$ o vs WW o W�a2 °w -•. Y JJ ou2� W .Y. °o uziz�W� i .yzzTWm� s .`..inn °JmrOJYr N6r� �LL OWV YF N�QI <QLt VC WwJ f NM ��`u iLJ�� N.°i.r w_Y Yu . YiW7Tt JOQrOQ7 ° •Li O /.W7J¢ �WM :,pC2� : :•.` $�3WWa: »3W3 J�2W Q4 SWSrrLWO<J SWJW JWQU J zWZrizmo °u•.am�J.rs <iisN „is <i�2WUS� <a WiW . ^z ^ivuo Y °Y� aQSS.°ai i ° {i{ uaN-N�a °i'�uu��.- +s�3pW 1 IOUm�62YL26w ��+�lUJO;N J�TJJJ Q �C.'6 t°LGV r NPFmrw PTOp� +dNOyNaNwrarNw+OF +aNmmdnNPfNNn mdmmnOmmaP dw mwPdPaPnrOdOF�OryrPOfmf ++ P 1 .^i��w��wN ^w °�P��dw�Nir w.F4HnNtiw w wdl-wm L'rp 3 ■ r w L�' Q t S N i @ a < 4 J 6 N' °I W� e m i Wi ii o . ononroonrNm °paonpnnAOOnnNAOOOAnron °nanoo o ^o.n mnY�mawmpPnomonrooNaFpNOOOOpNOrFooP non ynmaw:.�.nmryPaae as .'.nnow ra.n�o.ari re�,e +r.n ri.. „Y�. -m nF Nn na^amMynFM1aNwrw.r000NAa O„P N ^ArymnN n ^nN ^r nN a as wn..1 M N OPOrNnrNaFOpOnNnrYfaFOPO�PPPPPwPppp0000000 aaFFFFFFFFFFOmmmOmummmp�'' PPpPppP PPPPpPpPPPPpPPPPPPPpJPV ryaaaaeaaaaaaaaaeaaaNaaaaaaaaaee aFFFFFFFFF NNryryNryNryNNNNryNFIYry ryNNM1�YNryryNNNryM1M1NryNNNNNNN u Y n i L. W y Sv QYZi W�p 8�6 uTQ tQr «S N WPW ea.QYa�< Q rP 2'i O R V N <di a a c ai� o .. `o io��Q.. `Xoo =o "ooisiWwoNii UJjYyF2 Jy Sy�Y Rp �� y S N WVY1 yyVUU1 «rJVCyU W= WCiOOG �F V J ��! O�JQJN F Q�mQ Q.0i.2 T`y «6 ^�W° jJ<,dU YY W •N W6 � N RQ . S N N J(N¢NO« �N nKJFCN00 60 pWOy f mNFW y pr <y rW >y.WWNO O C yWQ CL W QFFi3r3�062W AN r.�JVtZCn wfaV 2 <YNWWW <N6 .w Qn C O N^ 2°W = ~„O, «EJLNJW .WYZJNY. W >W -a iFU\i .pi Wr ^1zYiW n oJZi Fy �33 s y� J zNCFNmrWZpJ.< '�.n U6« 6NN° WWSQZWLi�W�W °MLVipuZ//RQV�W_Vy°LppL�B~VV uy FFi� <VNJ «rte {JMmNWOU_<U<�WOWON O.[OJOFNl° � uZJ R <W�¢OWO6LOFSF° 6 >16L ��[[O BOO yWyUOWSW3Y OJ tO <UOF9uO NE QU�tW R- JOP «O °W�i WYpp S.IUUO'.y� <O.✓N <W W LVNNWOmQVr ;0006 <6nNR0�K�jSQpCOJ000VQaWQ6 o .z. a o p wJ >W uyi Ww V V <> N6 r W r Y oWd CQ y° Qi YWWp <tipp— N �6y�J� OVY�O �F a« . t «pm< pOOOQNO.a SWtFW ` OO ttYN VFNW °FZ 6�CVVV O< F06 NVUNl[� uUYFZdi� S� O YW Y °F23 pf2f (Y NN OOZ OVattFyO W QwQW^ 6 VENN N \SSNV�L<6WwYCn2VlNV OQ 2N O �6E Wr O Op NF.yr«¢ N<IYOWWWwNyN rN�`y OwHOC^u� 60 `V `ZO W• ZWW YQWpF `t 0000 `p zx. 2 O OCGL4�C666Qf[CLL0�6Q¢� <�Q¢mMMM�i onnoFnNaF mNrFnr a ^Pmonnnannrron araJroo rynon N M^= yryyP��neN�OryP�FnrynNarFPOPFNPPFrONn00 ,a Y N L a W ¢ s ¢ < j O ¢ i ¢ V 4 Q xin clpFnerwepooYOOOnrNONao anne ooPO � 1 O�OPnOwnNPNOa00pNryryPNnOSNNNOSOONO 1 fa �YrrNFa JOFNO Pa pp^�NYONPrNnNPONNYN 1 GN wSaN «wawNPr'Fnp JOS�w ^PNw w.yrwnO 1 O w N 1 n i PONNnlNaFppOr N!P � Orr..rr..rwrwNNwryNrywNTNnnlNl pn nl<nlFln niY FOSFOFOrrti�hn�rnnFrrFrtiwl •OQO00000 � ryNNNNNNNNNNNNryry NryNNNNryNNNNNNNNNryN FN u ��LL yp o V L �FJr N�Y¢ VZ din aNN <2V O JOe 'J ?'P< FF NOOr< NOL O �f��W �YY Y <PaUN�YOlaYY \ YP Y YW�WV W Y P`F \CWOJL6V\ �G �ar,y< 6y¢¢t ya WOOLLL O pY O LN R<11 Sys r¢WOwNNyy \S<n rL N`OwWLL W6LLe \W O>M�PWN by FOO y_OwUO 0 PVLa�I E¢� as W J VG O w N YO 4 VN NV rF • V YW O N J w V O WV Vy 06V J t< � Y �u V WNLLO V VS iY V <V W l r 00 <S OU osJ .Oi rY�V r r U'J N•2 GLLSSN�C ¢aJ4 uYi6V Nnii LL <F N rJ YW pWN_ii u t O 1¢VUNS�cW 6a<[Y rW > Y�:nUO �(�O Y2i O.0 Ow 1 CrZ0pOFV.LLVW60Fi 1,iO NC6 N ¢rJWiF�6� r,W- 1 w,cNa FN V¢ O J30 <Y2�6 u 2u0 F'X OFSrr¢NOjVp ¢WW N {f JW »a<<LYW USeYFV<22JOFY�2 XW ¢E2 <NLSAWtrurr SNW26JNVMOQ{O{G o oue F <F» »zss¢¢N iarzp <WWrWWOWa W lONNN'.NNNNNN F..WFFW� »YF�IYE3 >SOJXN ri N al 9aF PNM1dNPdOFNPnOwryNVrFFNOOF ION dPO � LI ryn^ ^IrynINPNrdndOYFOaOmdNNFNM1pS00 1 '� rJnr «wrn «wwlwM1waJ «aYM1lO -H 0 k r a� s i p< 2 Q < 4 x u 3 a M O r noroem000rNNN e arNnoe i Pa n o r �nooaoo M1oM1OrroNOr <Pna+;a ^e, N, a. .^ H N Q n neainn n .o Nin"�.m. nnn�u�°.aryn1°v�aew 1 1 + n g S nn 1 1 QN r M1 pM1nrN nrnn NNN nNN ffmummmmPPOO op000e00000auooa00000 rynnNOnaOmrrrra �farrr NNNNNNN N�NX aNNnnNNIaONnNN NNNMMNnNNNNNNNNNMM1M1M1M1M1M1M1M1 -n 6 N 1 1 1 1 �� WWY VNQW� 1 p.p iWnN WW WW L>M1iZ sn�w � WapoW M1 n: °a .M1. ain m.. Pl• P ww g". W.+ o J�a�J 2 yNaN Zg �- iW� ivi m xii < °��p� mNmn n "m • o i xNW 2s � oee "1.: <5�� ti V O J O O <� pp YJ¢ Y�J7U YUY a.21 (LJr' yV O J� J J66JJJupiC'SJ n O 41CC>Y <W= N S�NYOt S r Op�<J hW Wj YpSarJWW6 K YO y <SWn •Y- J ` N »�u<.WU =LNY N<O.�iI��.S W`nG y < 1 V N NWmpN6JONJ V`N YJ OWO`P6 i ��pY' Y m Ntill"'KWN LL�Y • u<6J6¢J <t -M1 W.>1 M1 6 yl N l m <WWWm�S W62Y` � VpedQO N6M Z V S K VywNM� p 7fQ��W =�J Nd�.ii >[V ] u H H L N N M1WM1 {�< F<OYOJG<WW<Jr�¢eQ�Y N p p � •, a pNNNaM NY <VW�+taaLt�LOW 6•�• a N a V < FJ N << M1 Va <g0 xSY 6 O p Qy YNY N W S J Jp J Os ws V j�W N � � LW 2SYM1 Vr f4N0_ �UM1 = N W Q.piyN N�N'^>iilr!! pNw N Q W � p EW �LNWWY6V < 1 i 40V � WHe T.EJVMJW SIVi� <y w62 YK I O i i rNOM6� LJOOJ<CWaf <r1>Oi4M.E>JO Wo � o N W Nan niN j6M1Jioiuo < =mWW o <Naio N N �YJY 6OW .EnNYWWO;m� � � OS�JY W u!<656WFWWGGRN O O O m O taW�WO� 6YOW y0206 r � � SJ60Lg < =M1C'jW 2NN0 < {N ZE "OOOW O 1 V j O 6 O O Q!L• <•fN « «N< O W r0 On ANaNM1nn PfM1arM1O NOraNO aP•'nrOnOnn=.rwcMr Nrr.100�w.>Pr r I ` N K t 6 f f 1 Y oz L 6 u 's a ° z Vi ^I Orw-.F pOON'DOVn0r0. eaY OqN 01- oOrr N O NrOOpaoonwn OgNnPOOpgNYnOnPwNPO lnOrOOaPNOngpFrryONNNq ^rYNnN anaN ?NONOnnNnNp.f NY \NOp�pPnNOnnwypp .rNry Pw »OwnOgNNNn N-.w rPPnFFPFwm NI'1NFYnN�PnOw ON O'fw U O PNr Ngrr w Nw0 O'f o�FnrNFhm^ orNnr +aFOPpwnn +laFmPOrnnrnaFOPo OmmmlpmmmP PpPppPpP0000000000.'. F FF�OO�OO�wFwn °�FFr00000000 UOr «....F r..ywrw hFFnFFF�FhFFFFFFFI -FFF NNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNnNNNryNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNN o i�sQ We qr =n=iT Wt s wi i�r.T i zr.Wi Jrw lrya �whF «eF� .W-1r 1W- r n urCPairp �� .Q �r a ^• Q aQWJaa aw «¢ axaW a w auWr W x wSF Wlo\1 YzNU a tiz YO° ^Zw �Oa iN i $n.lnyQi,cU Q cN-iY a UFsYG�JY y i! W r6r ai W wYomW NNaN i n oWn ¢Fn quniu0000`° STZS ve�a 1.- e =Y Wu wn 6 0 YU _Y W�U Qum, • .a T.2 i =ahrr.w QiNlL � 0 npo .LJG OW1 <VFnO�rNUani• .y GN YAW.. Otin ..K.Ya O mwJr.nN O K a26 SNWJ .2 mnuul1 O pJF fOF \ aNSJN Sp W NZ =SaR Off Jml Yj Vd\�NY iir02v {,l•u°iS «Saf aa ul <fl�j-WW�O N¢L ry.°.VnM_W- 'Kay <•[Y u >lr NS F�J4iW e_X NY[6N <Y J -m LNaa atVH6C Q <wawNmK t0+' <° < �YUti3 ^r hppz�o cNm��n a.4 z-W,,. Q.. -U"uu ----------- VFN� LWOPWW -lw WOV�j<�OSNWL YF UYV OF aYO.=.�NPW W. y�yJp�aa<Fw °.ai (LS yj J 0V,FO+<'f:S 4 2-u'— W'��1'J6 °Sa- —9SX- V.Wij«5<OJ VFS ��Nr LQW6�WNQ2 J.l<LOWmmWaW�aN 6 6WWFW rn..'�$�un s'lisaa:'u' ol'+°.am °n'ia��SiCiW .x. KC .°.ioN�a °tom a �6 W •y S 1 uaC Y it .Ki } V JONOS �O O r � 6.V+O�V^ O 2 i Fsm �.°l. 1J11.n.1�N= z >J Kor bi < °pT •o «ora�iz� Bq 2 Ur2N �WV VOW {O W.Yw� <U�6K «01° -aaUrN pY U`VN NQU_W ^� pvF.2nJrJ2VC�O o {uuu °\l�t V 2 i pnpNO p1C .� 1 °JyNaO� JY W_OrWf B W_ O «J =V� JJ ;1i 01[ ' oo a\SiW Q'�'2� °s °UtiYU�uiN ^ «.J.�'u o °z zszW °iW.l« m i .z. ° °saJ" <i�aW�F111 a`ppp°1 oa <aorhxWU'1W aWWWOa a< O W VV�VMYNnVV UYxUYOVY000pOW¢LmWWWWWWUUV1t�0i N <1 d.'1lP NFPKpOn00wOrnFpaFPYnn nnFdOPr N°�r^�OmPr a; dN 01-p ddFFweOndpOry�OFONdrFeo d.p FFF P opiww P.pipi .Ni w d..M wa-NiN ..F° MC.Ni.Oi M.Ni ^.Niw www 8 ' � ^ arrnwrrrvvoYVOO ^onoNo ^ ° o° YDYN. oN° noo <orNNOrocn.,00aorvooanNO°nna°N° t� ae�ep • • • DUOP°ry000000°gp00°n Onr• pe Y QI Pwr •°.,N ryPaOF ^N °ONOYNPr•°iYVN�w °•°.,n aNNNNDnM1Naw 1 aDNwNa 6 <� N M1wY N nnNNYrm YN � ^� 1 n < 1 t Q� YYy�Y�w Y•PiN ryN ^yNNNNNIDi�I^I^raal- ePO- INnrNah ^- ^nynrrrraryr w:$,� 1 NNNhNNry N,VryryNNNNNNNNNNN NhwNFwwww rl�F f, -hAhAF V ; NhhNNNNNNNN N,YryN U I �Ww �WW ¢W •" CW iK v x 1 VY Y•F..Y FF \ � nyW W wf W N 1 ° wt F � LYYY YY C W ryW aYw 'N'QS xss <�° owoauo `oo <6'" ^.z. iws9 °�° .°„F�ii +w.$i1tliMnoos < QYOO oWeo� uuuWN .uW �' uzo > we •z �a�iwia D o�• xi�ouu uuu W Q W¢ w.Y. YYYUW &R D Qd eQ - `N W e < eWW ¢ V ° s � 4 i ¢ O Y � V „ j O W N W F i � ij .• °x x0 p ru.Wn jjuWNW < N� <V..ii W uiiN n.i f� O•ii¢j�J� Cp,^ N jHSC¢.°.0 S� ��QQJO�i(W `7pitiC ?:WWZV « :W 2 uW =V¢SlQ w.t aSuW OW�OQ�WWN �.Wnwt= 3YU¢i.°i ,S)LZ> H< �w aNjS uWFW z QQZ�I[KiW�woiYQRQio 2<WZx °Cr ¢.e7 J °�' aNeNnw aan �n �nw'^��'Z �eizmoi e YYY °Nwww.••.F NF ONOPrgeNn w•°n Y•.N w•Ni •^i �..Y�.°i ON��ANN.•NNNYNtiM 1 ¢W 1 � pVV <V ZSW 6.Zi p ¢ 1 `O ¢QOF Q V WWO •ti ¢Y 2 ' SrU Ojd}pIW D NO° OWiN � .I �w °Y <•fN< °uQW °a d >oa i.LO ry Fi P < nrr�Y�n nN Nwh � i .rv.�wy��i n°•.°. a.N..°. s � 4 i ¢ O Y � V „ j O W N W F i � ij .• °x x0 p ru.Wn jjuWNW < N� <V..ii W uiiN n.i f� O•ii¢j�J� Cp,^ N jHSC¢.°.0 S� ��QQJO�i(W `7pitiC ?:WWZV « :W 2 uW =V¢SlQ w.t aSuW OW�OQ�WWN �.Wnwt= 3YU¢i.°i ,S)LZ> H< �w aNjS uWFW z QQZ�I[KiW�woiYQRQio 2<WZx °Cr ¢.e7 J °�' aNeNnw aan �n �nw'^��'Z �eizmoi e YYY °Nwww.••.F NF ONOPrgeNn w•°n Y•.N w•Ni •^i �..Y�.°i ON��ANN.•NNNYNtiM II• K Iq' i ooNOtlnF +roe+ oea00000P ^oNatlN +Owwad :; li •; 00000eoFaearn ONPOOPO�nOPI�n ryN �IP NON �NNPP�OdPOntlOnM ! c1 «n NOwoNFF ^ff2! ^pdw OlV ^fa +wf Of^ nlV r 41 Nf +waM ^aNPw �wPV «Y01°In pMa a W s Q� II i s 1 i ePOrN ^laaFOPOr «nfn al -ePO.+ Q1 nnfa(FOPOwnnaaan FFF1^•Iw• ^MFF FI•FF < 1 FFFF FM1FFFFFF Ff•FFFFFFFwFFFh NNN «NNNNnNNNNNNNNNNN «NNNn 11 ryNNrynNMNNnNNNNNn V ` s N.� 'o•' W V � LWWV�< FfWO(F 1 W W P e wMMrwU O 6Ma NM^'�dlwwV Q r ^W N^ r I R; P\ P (Wtl y66�2� 6 F w WQW CP W_ W_ W_W_WJWN d 4yO WS V „spp ^t�6 ^ OOOY00 GG S_ GFI O O •� Mj�iJCOe:V Q Y O VVYwyWUU SUO YYVQW y 1 1 �^ Y Y U� SYW WWWW^ 1WeF � ^YY$ 6n <u2w t Q FW6WQOQQ� N^ QO�u a « O UrQ { JN � 1 y _Y U<ey<pQ iNW JMO° SY Qg <pWU+�<NY�OJ 6NOQ� NwaQ IWrNFWJ Vp5 L FN <YFS 1 00 �'JF aW Qwt «� JNI• °OU JrN�QJ 6A°W 1 'Z'ZO tt�{ ,* YLe�0�i0.� yI.Y eQJeU MR JaL�ruu0e04�JQNOWN C ON FF�+ VJ Sf�<SOt� LSC u yOwN�w °FN> �� OtW111NWWY_ \N NI yy�� L GG aJVO N <NQyJ Z �VU tuZQ Y iM< RF {OV^ <O.2 rJ LrJW FNt LSWYr J6J�< p6 yM}. `OVFQ I1y U.I VFSWW(Z NOd i pQj� Sj yyYt(JS06LYWF IV `�e <W JO�e 6iY ^�a ^OWiee001•NOO � O Oy�{SrppJW ^SJ 5< O_SW�60� yde1W Y W�,W QO <ZJ Z L +� ^CY �NWNZ0 LLSOC �6Y4ti2p0 «1 >�IyjIV1�IgiI p6 pp�<wWr�yV�00.WtiL2W yQL( pY01��6WOO�OQdQVti�VO� LJw60F656VVUN6NQC° I } L I i V ^ a j oGU y P ~ uWW p i p i u W NZ V y N 1 uq1 O -2 p Ju i S M y O El B Hnp MI J>N U tQ �O eyiu R2 < u<i N OQ V Q ^W Q i i yu92 QS uWFr �'!^{ V OU pV Z�F Zr2iON YI VW OVOYI �LMOw^ QNOV2JV7FONr 'J J>OWjw< WLG JNSWN3 LL 000 WJF Z I WSIyV(O°rwtW pON a4eJC pH Vi °Q J VUW <Q 0<<0 <6F F_Z6J ' 1 �• J�OFi1 J�NWyFJ6NW� A L N4yWe 0 LL6pFyNW46HLVwW<LO�<J •N �<J JV_6 Z 0062 p j LL< Q2 .Z QOL tWNL < MN 1_<a wY00Jp VJ> rVr 60 {Y J_ W NNCC t1WiW< H ; yu$�`g4 � Q NJ<rLLW •6M <YSWNOr $ Ww;s Z °W Y_SQOH °ON ROwwyMMJpR �1yL YWLLp11{�f «2 V a { <LtWW WILYW H�f t5t2 � °O� ^O�Z26i^ Y• a W� O ZC N <O`(MwOQ�I� VLSS2�S000OOpLW6N66L666pQ aY�Q00006QQNZYIN +n/P1F FFnnFw+ f'i ftl1��R�R�Lgq�,y1. �' � 61 �N«1°'IFawnn wl°InPP «IYnOOweMNdnonRF� wdwNPOawwwwNww ^nw P 1 wwwN ^wF ^wPwNPI'• ^NwF+ndnM , i /Lrf t� �i♦ t( if d L W < L <_ S V 6 y< _ J u 0 6 M :I N OPOOOOFOONOOOwOOryryry lwOhOOPN.f OON � .CON000N•f .pN000PlOOn w1/ld O.f l/OFOdPNP >p^^NO ryONNOdOODFOONPh dll�w Nl�h AOhN w.p0 w ryeNNnNNNwNNN.N/rw wNwO Nf wON NFO�Fww N A q TN.pFOPOwN�/'I N..••FOPO wNI/f N.ph OMOwNI'/f �Mw '�M�OOOOOOpO00wwwwwrwJwn/NNNNry nnFnFr AI�INhrA��FArFrrfr�FA�fF� N NNryNNNNNNNNNNNNNNM1NNNNryryNNNNNNN u NW W WW rW nz zrN Lce .z Q � /'/ YJ O P/n4JewrWa� W WO F� OY V 6�w <n�0¢Nn6 <r¢QWi2 QQS ¢¢O/Qi/QQ a0 YN�rNeWUhW a Wr W aWW i i< z�nzioizu i xz xz >zz a¢ YOM /Nh •r�wFnVYi Ywrn an O `o ��Na`•oW o///JOO1 �W ce� huo Foo 3 n JjWJU�VY`WUJryYYY y[ YY Or YJO`UU U� rn/O. fQf Q �6fHW p . 2 <J SW/Yy /L LW¢ur�20 OO MWNNi h FJ OV J�LSNI W•WN iYOOu 1 N 9 M N o �J z W J �Q W < � WV Wj <OL OW2yNY / 4 W ti OWNN O V� YQr6<Q t 1 w WWMrWwZ FN< �uY N¢ J <�FJ�O 3 1 O uVLN2JrJ` ¢r Y J/Y000O 602 r`rNxW <O_062M WV O m S W /� O 1 p « W60Y QOWxwy. uuN11 <W OJKO ¢SJMQQW OJCNrON yy �r LN6<rWJJY< Q<�Z <WQ� x <y/ y <WS <ne ono 0000>� <W MWiiD 1 0N6>WxOFWGSNNNprYr «iJ2tJ NF/O JrYP 1 �2WWNnZ 2<lrWQW JJJJ <N6N� �x O 1 QO NhO �M1f FMJx<OQxL66yNNt<< yy/ ff O W N NQ/(/[NN3 N/(W hr7C » -J�7.O P33xWW30N O yj N 61 wNN NYIOFNlgdNOOwlefPrdwOhO N//e O�Nf P w.`O/n.`O/.`e1�.`p/d'!NlP NI/Nf Nf MIPFdFONOP � �N^.•neN.°.`y.°. F.n ref rNn .°. f� 3« t' at. e a_ i^ J ;1 , i -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October S. 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance Manager SUBJECT: CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS RECOMMENDATION• council taterove funds continuing the a coappropriations t ps efrom FY 87 -88 to FY 88-89. and a A1IALYSIS /BACKGROUND: Wring Fiscal Year 1987 (FY 87 -88), several projects were authorized by Council and funds were budgeted; however, the projects could not be completed durin FY 87-BB. To allow for the completion ting a continuing appropriation of funds tfrom uthe tFY 87 88c � tothea is re FY 88 -09 budget. Any l cdexpenditure 9 thoughthe ajued budget column andreflec edonthe reports provided to Council and department heads. The following continuing appropriations are recommended: Document Printing 1 -4333 -3900 1 -4333 -6028 $ S 15,550 220,395 Contract Services Contract Services 1- 4373 -6028 $ $ 39,000 110,770 Lions Park (20- 4532 -8006 20 -4532 -8007 $ 200,000 Beryl Park Entry Monuments 40- 4130 -8767 $ $ 26,000 60,000 Rochester Beautification 44- 4130 -8770 Respectfully subtaitted, -tt/"L Elizabeth Stoddard Finance Manager ES -.cm w' V .g s 4 am , W; r aa. •� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT R DATE: October S. 1988 s,. TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell fl. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Naintenanco Superintendent SU3JECT: Award of the design contract for drainage improvements at Red Hill Part Lake and Amphitheater to Linville Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors, Inc., of Rancho Cucamonga, in the amount of 514,800.00 Plus a'10% contingency, to be funded from Capital Reserve, Account 25- 4285 -7043 RECGIEWATION It is recommended that the City Council award the design contract for drainage improvements rs. Inc., t Rancho Cucamonga, innthe amoun Amphitheater $14,80Linville lus a110f1 contingency. Project to be funded from Capital Reserve, Account Ho. 25 -4285- 7043. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND The 1988 -89 Program of Service includes a capital mmintenancr ppro44cr f•r correction of drainage concentrations around the dee Hill perk Lake R Amphitheater qis £ u..'Xi tied, I RHM:OB:Jmb j ;1 ■ — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ar STAFF REPORT , Q's a a a gate: October 5, 1988 a Z To: City Council and City Manager 1977 From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakosht, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 87 -193) for a Professional Services Aoreeisent with BSI Consultants to provide additional services In preparing striping and signing plans, handicap ramps, driveways, drainage, specifications and estimates for 19th Street from Jasper to Carnolian. The Change Order is for the total amount of $16,020.00 to bring the contract total to $44,320.00 to be Daid from Systems Development Funds, Account No. 22 -4637- 8743. RECOIIEBOATION: It is recommended to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 87 -193) with Bat Consultants to provtd3 striping and signing plans, handicap ramps, driveways, and drainage specifications and estimates for the 19th Street from Jasper to Carnelian project. BACKGWM /AWILTSIS• The firm of BSI Consultants, Inc., was engaged in preparing Plans, specifications and estimates for i9th Street from Nest City Limits to Jasper. It 1s now found necessary to expand their contract to include handicap ramps, driveways, drainage and striping and signing plans to match the new stripes from Jasper to Carnelian. The Change Order is for the total amount of $16,820.00 to bring the contract total to $49,320.00 to be paid from Systems Development Funds. Respectf submitted, / e RHM:HH:pa,3 Attachment CITY OF RANCHO Crc HONGA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER City of Rancho Cucamonga ^•^^ ' urger no.: une Design Engineering Services for 19th Street between West City 11m!.ts a Jasper Street 0/4/88 Date. TO: BSI Consultants Inc. 16880 West Bernardo Dr., San Diego, CA 92127 Engineer You are hereby requested to comply with the following hanges from the agreement for engineering services. t in Contract Price In Contract Price A: Provide additional work of design -' engineering for the area between Jasper K, a Cornelian for signing, striping, handicap ramps, driveways and drainage. See work outlined in letter $15,820 dated 8/25/88. TOTAL $16,820 JUStIrICATION Expansion of scope of work The amount of the Contract will be Wee 'eased! (Increased) by the sum of: Sixteen thousand eight hundred twenty Dollars ($36,820.00 T— The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: Forty nine thousand three hundred and twenty Dollars ($49.320.00 _ The Contract period provided for completion will be (IncreasedMee eased) fumed a Sixty Days This document will become a su plement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto Requested:/ zisseli Engineer Date Ic-2;'2d. . Non Lngiruer ate Ap ,),oved ayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga Date 11 s intorma` oin it be used as record of any changes to the ori gi na eng neertng a;r3a-ent dated: November 18, 1987 Cu 07 -193 r t a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA STAFF REPORT `� • ~' GATE: October 5, 1988 `r TO: City Council and Cihl Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins. Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Award of purchase and approval to- execute a lease purchase agreement of a FMC Vanguard 4000 Street Sweeper from Kern Equipment Company, of PomxH», California. in the amount of >111,231.00. To be paid in five (5) annual payments not to exceed $26,000.00. To be funded by Gas Tax Account No. 09 -4637- 7045. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award the purchase of a FMC Vanguard MOD Street Sweeper from Kern Equipment Company of Pomona. California, in the amount of $111.231.10 ana authorizing the City Manager to execute a five -year lease purchase agreement to be paid in annual installments not to exceed $26.000.00 per year. Purchase to be funded from Gas Tex Account No. 09 -4637- 7045. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND On September 2, 1988, the City received three bid packages for one broom type street sweeper to be funded by Gas Tax Fund Account 09 -4637 -7045. Kern Equipment Company submitted a low bid of $111,231.00 on a FMC Vangguard 4000 broom sweeper. Nixon -Egli Equipment Company submitted a bid on a Mobil AY420L air vac sweeper which does not meet the Specification required by the City. Haaker Equipment Cogan submitted a 'No Bid'. Kern Equipment Company being the lowest responsible bidder and meeting specifications, It is recommended the City award the lease purchase to Kern Equipment Company in tha sum of $111,231.00 Respec submitted, Attachments /to l y lh .E 7, H pipn CdA O as O W V q OyN M�J 8 d 66" h Lh VGV � WYy f..f �qL qtO] SY N � OM Myy re tSrJy5��i N < tz W tiOK6 A •Vn LOfy rl O 4 pd W O G ?d ,O C Y tsY f..l N 1L Hof m d a. A S v 6 O m V rpi W C `H 6 p J iK J Ko 7, It is hereby recaateended that the City Council approve, award end execute the ...ore suoject Professional Services Agreement with CPS Consulting ..vil Engineers. The proposed improvements to the existing Cucamonga Creek Storm Drain, Phase 2 are intended to Increase the storm drain s current undersized capacity ranging from 300 to 1186 :ubfc feet per second (cfs) to the required capacity ranging from 685 to 2093 cfs. These Phase 2 improvements starting tram approximately 1400 feet east of the Cudamonga Creek Channel to ^—ast of Hellman Avenue supplement current designs and future designs for the construction program to improve the Cucamonga Creek Storer Drain easterly up to Amethyst Avenue. Said Cucamonga Creek Storm Drain which parallels the Southern Pacific Railway Tracks requires improvements to carry the 100 year storm flows in accordance with the City's Hester Plan of Drainage. RespeCtfuUy submitted, RHM:R a i ■ — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: October 5, 2988 To: City Council and City Marager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Richard R. Cota, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and GPS Consulting Civil Engineers for the preparation of an Economic Study as well as Design Plans, Contract Specifications and Engineer's Estimates on the Cucamonga Creek Storm Drain Improvements, Phase 2 starting from approximately 1400 feat east of the Cucamonga Creek Channel to east of Hellman Avenue. The per diem not to exceed fee of $35,506.00 will be funded by the Drainage Fund, Account No. 23- 4637 -8860. It is hereby recaateended that the City Council approve, award end execute the ...ore suoject Professional Services Agreement with CPS Consulting ..vil Engineers. The proposed improvements to the existing Cucamonga Creek Storm Drain, Phase 2 are intended to Increase the storm drain s current undersized capacity ranging from 300 to 1186 :ubfc feet per second (cfs) to the required capacity ranging from 685 to 2093 cfs. These Phase 2 improvements starting tram approximately 1400 feet east of the Cudamonga Creek Channel to ^—ast of Hellman Avenue supplement current designs and future designs for the construction program to improve the Cucamonga Creek Storer Drain easterly up to Amethyst Avenue. Said Cucamonga Creek Storm Drain which parallels the Southern Pacific Railway Tracks requires improvements to carry the 100 year storm flows in accordance with the City's Hester Plan of Drainage. RespeCtfuUy submitted, RHM:R a i ■ I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rya STAFF REPORT , DATE: October 5, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Etiwanda I and II Street Rehabilitation Improvement Project - Pecan Avenue and Catalpa Street and awarded to Laird Construction Co., Inc., for the amount of $182,600.00 (5165,992.8D plus 103 contingency) to be funded from Gas Tax Fund Account Nos. 09-4637 -8703 and 0-4637 -03 PECONE10TIOM: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Etiwanda I and II Street Rehabilitation Im�epprovement Project - Pecan Avenue and Catalpa Street, and authorize the Adsinistrative Services Director to expend $182,600.00, ($165,992.80 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Gas Tax Account Nos. 094637 -8702 and 09- 4637 -03. Background /Analysis On September 21, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Laird Construction Co., Inc., Staff has received from Laird Construction Co., inc„ executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents: reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Rasp submitted, cc: Purchasing � �t i A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ''7 � DATE: October 5,1988 STAFF REPORT ' TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: 6oel Lizo, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Archibald Avenue Nldening Isprovement Project from Highland Avenue to Lemon Avenue awarded to Bob Britton, Incorporated for the amount of $137,500,00 ($124,925.15 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from System Development Fund, Account No. 22- 4637 -8755 RECOMIEMBATIOW: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Archibald Avenue Widening Improvement Project from Highland Avenue to Lemon Avenue, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $137,600.00, ($124,925.15 pplus 10% contingency) to be funded from System Oevlopemert Fund, Account Wo. 22- 4637 -8755. Background /Analysis On August 3, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Bob Britton, Incorporated. Staff has received from Bob Britton, Incorporated, executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Res f u ly submitteO, C� 8104 7CTJ'm6" cc* Purchasing Y w r - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGx4GA C% ^ - STAFF REPORT° ' C DATE: October 5, 1988 ° 8 TO: City Cuuncil and City Manager Lon FPCM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Jr., Civil Engineer SUBJECT: :xecuta contract for the Via Carrillo Drive Improvement Project froo Avenida Vejar to East of Sierra Madre Avenue awarded to Laird Construction Co., Inc, for the amount of $193,000.00 (f175,1i4.71 plus 10% Contingency) to be ft-nded from Grants C.D.B.G. - Account go. 28- 4333- G704. RECOMPOWATIOM: It is recoa:mendad that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Via Carrillo Drive Improvement Project ,.:d authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend 193,000.00 ($175,114.71 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Grants C.D.B.G. - Account Ho. 28 -4333 -8704. Background /Analysis On September 7, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Laird Construction Co., Inc. Staff has received from Laird Construction Co., Inc. executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Respectf ll ubmitted, Iq / {,� RRLM :JIL__'�— a� w '! ti.r- Pw�;x "L'1.` "'"''� ":c: :i°w •C��`"t we s'?C G :- �-,�.:s.*}:�C�;"'1i�Y;3;a'��iv X'7,¢"^= � •z s` .. -tee :;•.i(�",.�`_Y: � {�- -_� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - `M STAFF REPORT�? o DATE: October S. 1988 rAN TO: City Council -and City Manager um FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Hellman Avenue Storm Drain Ioprovement Project from Monte Vista Street to the Santa re Railroad Cucamonga Store Drain awarded to Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for the, amount of $1,2413,000,00 ($1,18x,225,00 plus 5A` Contingency) to be funded from Drainage Facilities Fund, Account No. 23- 4637 -8626. RECOMME1MTION: It is recoamended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Hellman Avenue Story Drain Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $1,248,000,00 31,188,225.00 plus 5% contingency) to be funded from Drainage Facilities Fund, Account No. 23 -4637 -8626. Background /Analysis On September 7, 1980, City Ccancil awarded the subject project to Steve Bubalo Construction Co. Staff has received from Steve Bubalo Cam ;tru -tion Co., executed contract documents, bonds and insurance doc,smants; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordence with the contract proposal. Respectfully submitted, ~. % cc: Purchasing F CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA y STAFF REPORT GATE: October'5, ILMo TO: City Council and City Manager tsn FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Jr., Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Tryon Street Sidewalks Improvement Project west of Archibald Avenue, including Alternate -'A', east side of Jadeite Avenue awarded to 8 -1 Enterprise Corporation for the amount of $27,101.76 to be funded from Pedestrian Grants /Art. 3, Account No. 15 -4637 -8717. It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Tryon Street Sidewalks Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $27,101.76 to be funded from Pedestrian Grants /Art. 3, Account No. 16- 4637 -8717. Background /Analysis On September 7, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to 8-1 Enterprises Corporation. Staff has received from 8 -1 Enterprises, executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents, reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accurdanee with the contract proposal. Respectf submitted, 77' cc: Purchasing t f S F .® ��✓ t6 v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' SdNA TAFF REPORT F : October 5, 1988 City Council and City Manager Mr Pte: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lightings.at the Intersection of Highland Avenue Elect Archibald the Improvement Project S71.80o ppd(S65 260.00 Plus 10% Contingency) to be funded from TDA/Article 8, Account Ho. 12-4637 -8824. WXAM WTIOM: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lightings at the Intersection of Highland Avenue and Archibald Avenue Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $71,800.00, (S6S,260.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from TDA/Article 8, Account No. 124637 -8824. Background /Analysis On Electric. Inc. Staff his received fromeHovey Electric, Inc., to contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contrcct proposal. Respe fy y;sy' fitted, RDDi: cc: Purchasing 1 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCASIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell 11. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 11106, located west of Kenyon Way and south of Victoria Park Lane, submitted by The William Lyon Company It is recomended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 11106 and authorizing the C1tJ• Clerk to cause saate to record. Analysis /Background Parcel Map 11106 was approved by the Planning Commission on January 13, 1988, for the division of 14.12 acres of land into 2 parcels to the Victoria Planned Community Development District, located west of Kenyon Way and south of Victoria Park Lane. Improvements are to be constructed ft the time of building permit issuance. Respec_tfjaly sybmitted, . , Attachments cl { - iM 0 I .14 e• 'RESOLUTION N0. 0 JJ D A RESOLUTION OF THE'CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NAP NUMBER 11106 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 11106) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 11106, submitted by'The William Lyon Company and consisting of 2 parcels, located west of Kenyon Way and south of Victoria Park Lane, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Nap Number 11106 is the final map of. the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Nap; and I. approval ofEthhe final maptby the City Councilaofisaid City haveunow been met. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - HEREBY RESOLVES that said Parcel Map Number 11106 be and the'same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present 'same to the County Recorder to be filed for recoil. a- � SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE No PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL Ii NtllElliS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box e07 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government Code, the undersigned hereby a roes that all monuments shown on the final map of Pit? are to be set and furnished by the suhdtvtder's I or surveyor the Engineer's or Surveyor's Cart coca an agrees to urnishp the inctes thereon to caeplete ail engineering requirements specified in Section 66497, Of the Government Cods. The undersigned hands you herewith the sus of f 2500.00 N°• as a cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee t at a monuments wilt a sec and the notes furnished as above Provided on or bufare the date specified and that the engineer or surveyor will be paid by the Unndersigned. It It complete understood and within then Liar fail$ to Cucamonga is authorized to complete said raquireecifi or cause they to he completed and the cost thereof is to be a charge against said cash deposit, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to make the necessary transfer from said dash deposit to the credit for the proper make fund. it is further agreed that if the underiigned does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and if the engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed In Section 66497 of the Government Code, the City shall Pay to said engineer or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made. if the cost of Completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference within thirty (30) days g after the written difftrene betweenmtheeCash deposit and the actual cost said requirements. Cordially, !- WTI-LIAM LYON COMPANY Subdivider Rhibald Avenue -Suite BAvenue -Suite B Address �he Cueamonea Ca 91730Cueamonea Ca 91730 Date September 20 1988 The deposjkCCr/of record (for return of be `" an Y portion of the cash deposit) shall Ste Ass 8540 Archibald Avenue -Suite B RanehO Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 -wmc: 'u It suslITm FULLY FILLED wr Am sIFiza in TRIPLICATE 3/17/86 8 ti n T , DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RMCHO.CUCAMONGA STAFF'REPORT` ■ October S. 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Linda Beek,Engineering Technician Approval of Parcel Map 10295, south of fountain View Drive, between Spruce and Milliken Avenues, submitted by Lewis Development Company RECOMIEIWTIOM It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel iup 10295 and authori_ing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Analysis/Background Parcel Map 10295 was approved by the Planning Commission on June 10, 1987. for the division of 16.12 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Terra Vista Planned Community, located south of fountain View Drive, between Spruce and Milliken Avenues. Parcels 1 and 3 are for portions of the foot and bicycle greenwAy. Parcel 2 will be a park and Parcel 4 is for a future elementary school. Resp u submitted, i e :LB:jmb Attachments z i i . AESOLUiION H0. pRO RN10CUCAMONGA, C LIFORNIA,'WYING PARCEL P NUMBER (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 10295) ' WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Nap Number 10295, submitted by Lewis Development Co. and consistingy of 4 parcels, located south of Mountain View Drive, between Sprdce and Milliken Avenues, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 10295 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. HEREBY RESOLVES thatOssaaid Parcel Map NuaberFl 295 CITY be and the same is approved and the City Engineer'is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. ,i ��6_, c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIII MMG DIVISIoll 3/ V _ R 4�. �y�3,�j•1+�.�i• n �� . CITY OF Rk,*ICHO CUCANIONGA �a 1� Y .STAFF REPORT DATE: October S. 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Russell 0. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 11105 locateo at the southeast corner of Kenyon Way and Woodruff Place submiVed by The William Lyon Company Parcel Map 11105 was approved by Planning Commission }on January 13, 1988 for the division of 15.06 acres of land into 2 Parcels in the Victoria Planned Community Developaert District located at the southeast corner of Kenyon Way and Woodruff Place. Improvements are to be constructed at the time of buildipg permit issuance. RECOIIEIOATI011 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 11105 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Respectfu , submittod, P1g1:6-- jmb i Attachments +yt3 ,.�c L.Tt."• °e�'44"o r- xr +. ..�. i'�=��.i''ew�ry?w/f: i'' +°'�� ;jf' `�'= sy't.. -•i _ss"`'�.; txJrle - t _ F �IttlAr ci �• �` • �� RESOLUTION NO. 0 S 15 L70 A RESOLUTION OF THE, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUHOER 11105 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 11105) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Nuaber 11105, submitted by The William Lyon Company and consisting of 2 parcels,'Jocated on the southeast corner of Kenyon Nay and Woodruff Place, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and -' WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 11105 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Nap; and WHEREAS, ail of the requirements established as prerequisite to aoproval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Parcel Map Number 11105 be and the same is hereby approved and the My Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. 33 9 Mk A °x x a �;D r z r D -74c 3 D b ZD F. Awl �4 "�F a ai is :f"91.rv,s n, vxr•+• rt}: 9'.'= ,�i.Y&U`c?,��>;��jd ?W!?:J ' "* - ' -c, .- _ -°-- . _• r,, _.v .. t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA +� : `STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5,' 1988; TO: City Council and City tanager FROM Russell H. MaCuire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for 6891 Ametiyst Street, submitted by Lary Mathes RECOINWOMM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreemetc and security and authorizing the Kayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND As a condition of Issuing a building permit, off -site Improvements are required adjtcent to 6891 Asethyst Street. The Developer, Larry Mathes, 1s submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the constructlnn of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: p, Faithful Performance Bond: $3,200 Labor and raterial Bond: $1,6C0 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Re sp ufpoitted, RID . Attachments nn: 3S i n i ■ RESOLUTION -NO. A RESOLUTION OF_ME%CITY COUXCIL_OF THE:CITY-OF RANCHO CUCAMO)KA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVIVr—TMPROVEKEWr..AGREEMENT. T IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR'6891 AMETHYST STREET - .6 WHEREAS, to meet the requireients established as prerequisite,to approval of a building perniti- Larry Mathes the ownerof the'pro erty at 6891 re Amethyst Stet has offered the' Improvement- Agrtement,submitted herewith for approval and execution bylsild City,' together with good and sufficient Improvement Security. % NOW. THEREFORE, THE CITY-COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.- HEREBY RESOLVES as follows, 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorizod to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto, and 2. That said Improvement Security Is accepted as good and sufficient,, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and ■ Q O � tv a Y t� V r U %.l m ' , --- /�© a / e% i 9 s y ,y Y I w .MtiLO:.. 3% e Y I w .MtiLO:.. 3% I "r �t s� S� f H CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 87 -16, located at the southeast corner of Hallman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by NuNest Company REC01101DATION It is recomwended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND CUP 87 -16, located at the southeast corner of Hellman and Foothill Boulevard, in the Foothill Specific Plan, Community Commercial District Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on November 10, 1987. The Developer, NuNest Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $397,965.00 Labor and Material Bond: 5158,982.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in thi, City Clerk's Off'ce. Letters of approval have been received from the hig;i school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga Cnunty Water Distri:t. C.G. 6 R.'s Iuve also been appproved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation fern signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respec fitted, RHM:L . Attachments - 3S RESOLUTION NO. gg'-siL�- A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 87 -16 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on SeFtember 16, 1588, by NuWest Caepany'as developer, for the improvement of public right- of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the tens thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, CUP 87 -16; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accampanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 3� RESOLUTION NO, j ja A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO is CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 87 -16 s WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, , California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 197E', being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of th ®'State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance. District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter refarred to as the 'Maintenance District'); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972• authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and w WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of properly within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or firing of an Engineer's 'Report'. NOV. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAI:CHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as described in Exhibit '8' attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including heT of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ezA 71 -, EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 _ ------ ---- -- .a., -- �---------- - - - - --- WL II ( � I 1 I ' 1 1 .MY _ t IICVI,> 1 7`7777 i (L frftitt I ( II ' .1 11 II'I 1 I 1 � I S,r; ^ crff OF RANCHO CUCAMON(IA ('I I1 P R7 -I b �7 � covrrr�r os SAx as�xASDa10 STATR OF CALiF�ORNU Im � 1 E701IBIT 'D• 1 1. PROJECT NAME CUP 87 -16 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 8.2 acres NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 16 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT i Nq. of L s to be Annexed District No. lrj,wu 27.500 1 3 3 --- -° 6 5 —_ -__ --- --_ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf District No. Street Naas 3 Ground Cover Trees Sq. ft. Sq. ft. Ea. 12 Y a A ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORTG7 DATE: October 5, 1980 v TO: City Council and City Hanger FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Stove M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspectt'� SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10349, located on the west side of Sapphire Street south of Jennet Street, submitted by Walton Construction Corp. It is accepting recommended subjectaagreeme tt extension andosecurity and authorizing resolution, Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. /UULYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarartee the construction of the off -site improvements for Tract 10359 were approved by the City Council on July 2, 1987, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $326,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $163,000.00 The developer, Walton Construction Corp., is requesting appproval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Resp f submitted, �( e RHH:SN6:.j� Attachments V3 0 i RESOLUTION NO, 8 g y i OF TH �� ION' LIFORNIAr APPROVING TtfROVEWN�T O RANCHO EXiEHSION AND "V'OV�W SECURITY FOR TRACT AG!W 4ENT \: Calffornf�`ha - thi City Council of the City n executed on October Its Consideration Walto an lafrovemOn Corp o Cucamonga• the i�rolly da of public r•� °D Construction A sPecff1ea11Y described 1 tt' graement.Extension Sapphire Street therein M'AY adjacent to Ue as developer WHEREAS south of rennet And generally the �e61 property •effor kvst m Improvement ARyEAS• the installatfon of such faprov conJunctfon wlteement and the development o�sa d terms joereof •isetorbeedone In said argent A 349; And tocsgid Jxp 6v g�daa dtsufficient Improvement Extension mproveynt Agreement &ent mprov�nt Seeurlty,S secured Identified Rancho Cuc�• THEREFORE. BE IT said Improve. California, that said Iaphv �une11 aP the City of authorized to signnsa. and A are he eby approved andensloi °or is the City of Rancho y the City Clerk to attest he on behalf of thereto. �t . M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October S. 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire. City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement mid Improvement Security and Ordering tho Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 87 -26, located on the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by OAS Irnestors RECOM EIOATION It is recomended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Nos. 1 and 6,RandauthorizingNthe 3 and Mayor aadtthehCity Clterknto sign said agreement. AN&YSIS/BACKGROUND CUP 87 -26, located on the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothll Boulevard, in the Spec:aity Comercial District Development District, was approved by the Planning Comission on January 27, 1988. The guarantee other, construction Investors, is thes Off siite improvementst in thee Cfol o ing amounts: Street Improvements Sto.m Drain Faithful Performance Bond: $951,000.00 $793,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $475,500.00 $396,500.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school ppdistricts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. 6 R.'s have also been signed by roved the DeveloperryisAonfile The Clerk's aoffice. Annexation form ResDec 1 ubmijted, �/ i RHM:LB:JAA:jmb Attachments ys r i z i. �T r YT,t w RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION'OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEIEMT'SECURITY FOR CUP 87 -26 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on September 16, 1988, by OAS Investors, as developer, for-the-,improvement of public right- of -wyr adjacent to the real property syecifically'described therein, and generally located on the northeast corn er of Foothill - Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in sold onjuenent Agreement dand subject to' the terms, thereof, is to be done in conjunction v development of said real property as referred to Planning Comission, CUP 87 -26; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be-end -4he -4ame are hereby approved and the Mayor is 4wreby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement bn behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. RESOLUTION ND. b g - 5 940 A RESOLUTION OF THE'CITY COUIXIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA ,'CAI.IFORNIA;,ORDERING THE AiWEXATION OF CERTAI9 TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENARE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT M. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 87 -26 WHEREAS, the City Council, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a s ecial maintenance district pursuant to the Part 2 of the the andpHighways LCodeiof he Division special maintenance district known and designated a% Landscape Maintenance Maintenance District NO. 16h(herreinafterareferred totasothe 'Maintenanceighting District'); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District. and WHEREAS at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings ncorporated hereinxby the this refeerencedrtoethe Maintenance District; and to and WHEREAS, all of he owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to he Maintenance District have filed with he City Clark thei- written consent to the proposed, annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Repor. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That his legislative body hereby orders the annexation described inrExhibit"B attached Exhibit hereto and to he Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including a evy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. T W MIBIi 'A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 11A �y i S,,pi° ' y^ CPY! OF RANCHO CUCAKOWIA (', t l P Ri -2G, ` c COUNTY OF SAN RIMNARD1110 STATi OF CALIFORFiRA lv � y� V. EXHIBIT •8' PROJECT NAME CUP 87_26 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 1051 acres NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 21 units STREET LIGHTING IAINTENANCE DISTRICT District Nn_r ko, of L s to be Amaxed _: Um 1 --' - - 13 .._ --- 6 --- -.- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf District No. Street Name Sq. ft. ,q 3 r Ground Cover Trees Sc. ft. Ea. 8 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 5, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician Approval of Map, Agreement for Postponement of Recordation t: Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 12653 -1, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Twenty - fourth Street, submitted by The Walton Associated Co. RECC"01DATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 12659 -1, accepting the subject agremerts and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said map to record. ANALYSISAACKGROUND Tract 12659 -0, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Twenty - fourth Street in the Very Low Residential Develo nt District, was approved by the Plann ;ng Commission on September 9, 1987 for the division of 67.67 acres into 138 lots. The Developer has submitted an Agreement for Postponement of Recordation of C. C 6 R's until he has Department of Real Estate approval. The Developer, The Walton Associated Co., is subm!tting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Street Improvements Storm Drain Faithful Performance Bond: $600,000.00 $132,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $300,000.00 $ 66,000.00 L� O aaa , F1 S. TRACT 12659-1 OCTOBER 5. 1988- PAGE 2 Copies of the agreement and security,are available in the Cf Clerk's Office. -Z Letters of approval have -been 1 received from the' high school and el6intary County'Water District. The Consent and Waiver T5 school districts and Cucamonga' 1.2 to Annexation fcru sf�ned,,,by the on file In the City Clerk's office. 1espWecy-�O_ tied, :4- RM. Attachments W- w RESOL'IT109 No. gg - 5917 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOWGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEIENT OF C.C. 8 R'S, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT, NO. 12659 -1 'z WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12659 -1, consisting of 138 lots, submitted by The Walton Associated Co., Subdivider, located en the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Twenty- fourth Street has been submitted to the City of Rancho,Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Agreemtn for Postponement of C.C. a R's and an Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval sbid Final Map offering for dedication for street and highway purposes the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authcrized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That said Agreement for Postponement of C.C. a R's be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute sane on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 4. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. �r- / • 1 C; RESOLUTION NO. I g • 5 • s A RESOLUTION OF-THE CITY COUNCIL GF THE CITY OF aRANCHO - CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT No. 12659 -1 California,hassPreviouslyforrmedia sof ethe City of nancehdtstrfmonpursuant to the toms of the Streets and High Lighting Act of 1972', tieing Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets end Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Ligghting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Maintenance District"); and �= " WHEREAS. the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the sk Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and C WHEREAS, At this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on `xhibit 'A' attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and u ,- 3 to be annexed Rto the Maintenancce District have filed with the City Clerk their s written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or ,• filing of an Engineer's -Reports. NOW. THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA y HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. of th SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation d e proper Pas shown in Exhibit "A' and the work program areas as escribed in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. including SECTION ?of all proceedings of thenterritory ct. annexed hereunder S13 y i EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ciff OF R"cEO CUCAOYONOA COUNTY OF BAIT SMASDINO IA L BTATZ OF CAI.I+Oum i I E)aUBIT •B' PROJECT RATE TRACT 12659 -1 No. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 138 tots N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 138 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of La s to be Annexed District No. 1 -° 1 --- -- --- 2 26 -_- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Rage Sq. ft. So. ft. Ea. 1 Interior Streets - -- - -- 221 ■ Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1988 �M TO: City Council and City Manager �CJ� FRON: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BT: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Works Inspector - SUBJECT: Accept the Arrow Route, Phase I from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Averua, Contract No. 88 -031 as wmplet -. release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion' and approve the final contract amount of $286,878.59. REC0NOWTION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Arrow Route, Phase I from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, Contract 'Ia. 88 -031 as coaolete, authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion. and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 2243,000.00 and accept the 10% Maintenance Bond in the amount of $28,500.00 for one year, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $14,343.93 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of 2121,500.00, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been .received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $266,878.59. Background /Analysis The subject project has been completed in accordance with Uie apprved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is $286,878.59 which includes 1 change order to be approved by council for additional paving, overtime wor''A and a nuisance drain. Respe f submitted, P. M:MDL:sjm cc: Purchasing 5� tME RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF -THE-,CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RPZHD CUCAMONGA, CALIFORM14 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR103DW ROUTE; PHASE:VFROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HER OSA- E OF AvEwuE. c6kTfwT,.NO. 88-031 AND AUTHORIZING TH FILING THE WORK A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR N jion of public imprc`vcments,for Arrow Route' WHEREAS. the construction 'P, Phase I from Archibald Avenue,to He-mos& Avenue, Contract•No. W031 have been completed to t1ja satisfaction 'of'th6 City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hm n6i accepted and the City Engineer Is wOsl authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. tME y4f5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Accept the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersections. of Carnelian Street at Red Hill Country Club Drive and Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion' and approve the final contract amount of $146,387.85. RECONQMTION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersections of Carnelian Street at Red Hill Country Club Drive and Carnellan Street at Vineyard Avenue as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion% and authorize the releass of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $133,777.00 for one year, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $10,883.89 upon receipt and acceptance of the 10% Maintenance Bond in the amount of $14,400.00 for one year, and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $60,888.50, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $146,387.85. Background /Analysis The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount 1s $146,387.85 which includes 3 minor change order(s) for additional coordinatiop equipment and a credit to the Contract. The original amount approved by Council was $147,5DO.00. Respectful y submitted, RHM:MD m cc: Purchasing s9 ■ y RESOLUTION No. U V (GQD A RESOLUTION OF ?THE�CITY`COUMCIL OF THE CITY OF�RANCHO t' CUCAMONGA `CALIFORNIA;'ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYL'MENTS FOR' TRAFFIC'' SIGNALS " "A4D'SAFETY'LIGHTING,AT'THE e� INTERSECTIONS OF,CARNELIAW STREMAT RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB'DRIVE"AND CARNELIM 'STREET.AT °YINEYARD'AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING ME,FILING. OFF A•P,OTICE Q °,COMPLETION FOR THE WORK A -. - WHEREAS, the construction'of public improvements for Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting, at the'Intersections - sections Street at Red Hill Country Club Drive and.Carnelian:Street at Vineyard Avenue have been completed to the satisfrction of the;City, "Enginear; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is - hereby accepted and the City'Engineer is authorized to s ;gn and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. e-4�1' . »f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C0CAa:q STAFF REPORT 1 B1 DATE: October S. 1988 8 T0: City Council and City Manager sr, PROM: Russell H: Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve .4. Gilliland, public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 10046 located on the north side of Hillside Road east of Archibald Avenue REC019EMBATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond Background /Analysis The required one year maintenance poriod has ended and the street Improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, r 5 i I Release: DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P. 0. Box GO Upland, CA 91786 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $24,700.00 Respectfully ubmltted, RHMcSMG*Jafr-�- 6 ■ DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 5, 1988 Cfty Council and Cfty Manager Russell H.. Maguire, City Engineer Steve M. Gi1111and,,Public Works Inspectq Release 'of Bonds and Notice of Completion REC01lENBATION: The acceptaooleewannore and I It 87-22 have been City council�accoeopptisaid ani authorize authorize he City Clerk cto release the Faithful NPerformance Bond in the amount of 3100,200.00. Background /Analysis DR 87 -Y4 - located at 9345 Santa Anite north of 4th Street DEVELOPER: Hessengg er Investment Company 16912 -A Von Kaman Avenue Irvine, CA 92714 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5100,200.00 Respect ybmitted, Attachment 1 I r X• a RESOLUTION No. 8Zr1�01 ! la'ti A RESOLUTION'OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAkNO t, COCA40MGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 87 -22 AND AUTHORIZIMG.THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of publM.Improvements for DR 87 -22 have been compieted to the satisfaction,of the City Engineer: and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW. THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is- hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t ;r STAFF REPORT • � O DATE: October S. 1988 - a �i TO: City Councf- and City Manager rsn FRDA: Russell H. Magulra_ City Engineer - BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto�T�'- SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECONNOWTION: The required street improvements for OR 86 -33 have been completed fu an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $4,400.00, Background /Analysis DR 86 -33 - on the north side of Civic Center Drive east of Utica Avenue. DEVILOPER: Paul 011vera 10670 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $4,400,00 Respe tfuNy submitted, R}M:SMG:Jmb Attachment c 2 .. • 9 x I - RESOLUTION 40. Miff ION 'OF. „THE'CITY,COUNCTL :OF,THE CITY OF RANCHO ` omu. CALIFORNIA,'%'ACCEPTING THE. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS - IR 86 -33 AND. AUTHORIZING THE-FILING:OF A'.NOTICE-OF . COMPLETION FOR THE WORKf N WHEREAS; =the con`structi'onrof public,improvements for DR 86',33, have' been completed to the satisfuction�ef the City Engineer; -and WHEREAS, a Notice`uftCoyletion ' ts-required to be filed, certifying the work complete. - * ” NOW. THEREFORE, the C11iy',Councl hereby resolves, that the work' is Aei%4y authorized to sign and file a Notice of San BernarCino County. I of the City of Rancho Cucamonga accepted and the City Engineer is Completion with the'County Recorder of , U, z b r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, Cfty Engineer BY: Steve M. Rilliland, Public Works Inspec` rib .--5 SJIBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion The required street improvements for Tract 11853 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $4,250.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $42,500.00. Background /Analysis Tract 11853 - Located on the northeast corner of 19th Street and Rasona Avenue Accept: DEVELOPER: Roy E. Daly Construction 9035 Haven Avenue, /102 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 4,250.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $42,500.00 Respect su itted, � y _ RHM:SMG:jmb Attachment 4s 4� MEN . RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITI'.COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO e FCA,85F CALIFORNIA, CE FORJRAT113AN �ORIZiTHE FILING OFATT OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Lenstruction of public imps verments for Tract 11853 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engt,:eer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to to filed, certifying the work complete. NON. THEREFORE, the City Council of tho City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is 1a eby accepted and the City Engireer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. - mi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAmomit STAFF REPORT' DATE: October 5, 1988 TO: City Council a.:d City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector1,� SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion J REC01161DATId1: The required street improvements for Tract 12365 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the Caom�opunt of and.authorizeutherCity Clerk to release the Faithful PerformancCol erformance 8ondiin the amount of $421,840.00, Background /Analysis Tract 12365 Off -situ Improvemments - located on Church Street and on Terra Vista Parkway between Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue. DEVELOPER: Western Properties P. 0. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 42,184.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5421,840.00 Respectf K submitted, RHM: Fab Attachment �7 t u i MatUTION 110. 0 D LZ)L/, A RE_SOLUTIdN OF-,iT'K-- CiTIO , COUNCIL,,OF THE CITY, I OF;RXKHD - CUCAMWiA,�'CALIFORNIA'A"ACCEPTING4THE.PLqILIC'-IMPROVEWJM FOR TRACT,12365 OFF-SITEIMOVEMENTS ARD XTWORIZING'THE FILING OF KNOTICE'OF-COMPLETIOATOR TKiWORK" WHEREAS. 't$Wc'ois"truc'$l'o'n'6f.publfc.iryro"vciients for X6det,12365 Off- site Improvements have been'tcoTleted to,the,satisfaction of:the City) Engfneer;'and'•. WHEREAS, a Notf CeI of Comp , letter Is required 'I to tAt'- fil , ed, certifying- the work complete. THEREFORE. the City .Council of the City of 'Rancho -Cuca'mon*9'A_ hereby .solves, that the-,work is hereby accepted and,the:City Engineer is, authorized to sign and file a Notice -of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. I I rf , It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached ResoIutio: accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study Parts I amt II for the proposed Alta Loma Storm Drain, Reach 18, Watershed Area V, from Alta Loma Basin No. 3 to Hermosa Avenue and issuance of a Negative Declaration therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Determination pursuant to the California Envfronmental Quality Act. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS• This rep3rt presents an Envfronrental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Alta Low Store Drain, Reach 18, Watershed Area v, from Alta Loma Basin No. 3 to Hermosa Avenue. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State guidelines, the attached docuunt has been prepared to permit construction of the above - mentioned fmrrovemmnts. Said improvements generally entail the installation of reinforced concrete pipe, outlet structure, manhole and catch basin. It is tnia Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project will not create a sfgnificant adverse im}act on the environment and therefore recommend Issuance of a He:atfyo Declaration. Res, - Hy suhmfLted, r R:al:HX.7. amf ' Attachacrt • 61 I -- CITY OF RANCIIO CUCA51ONGA y� STAFF REPORT Date: October S, 1588 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Hur0oshi, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the.proposed Alta Loma Storm Drain, Reach 18, Watershed Area V. from Alta.Low Basin Uo. 3 to Hermosa Avenue and isouance of a Negative Declaration therefor It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached ResoIutio: accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study Parts I amt II for the proposed Alta Loma Storm Drain, Reach 18, Watershed Area V, from Alta Loma Basin No. 3 to Hermosa Avenue and issuance of a Negative Declaration therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Determination pursuant to the California Envfronmental Quality Act. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS• This rep3rt presents an Envfronrental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Alta Low Store Drain, Reach 18, Watershed Area v, from Alta Loma Basin No. 3 to Hermosa Avenue. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State guidelines, the attached docuunt has been prepared to permit construction of the above - mentioned fmrrovemmnts. Said improvements generally entail the installation of reinforced concrete pipe, outlet structure, manhole and catch basin. It is tnia Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project will not create a sfgnificant adverse im}act on the environment and therefore recommend Issuance of a He:atfyo Declaration. Res, - Hy suhmfLted, r R:al:HX.7. amf ' Attachacrt • 61 I RESOLUTION N0. p 0 � � -'Z A RESOLUTION-OF THE,CITi COUNCIL OF Tk CIMOF y, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ;+ ERVIRONRENTAL- INITIAL_STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGRTIVE•DECLARATION FOR •THE PROPOSE) ALTA LOMA STORK DRAIN; REACH 18, WATERSHED AREA Y '^ WHEREAS; °the City Council of•the City of Rancho Cucamonga has rMewed all avallable,input concerning the proposed Alta Loaa_Storm Drain, Reacn 18, Watershed Area Y; and ` WHEREAS, said improvements require an. Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, an Enviroraaental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to ttie Californla.Enviranatntal Quality Act; as amended. NOW, THEREFORE,464T- RE30`iR♦-thaf the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: The City Council of the Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the En-Vi—ro—m-e-nTal Assessment Initial Study and issuance•of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Alta Loaa Storm Drain, Reach 10, Watershed Area Y. Section 2: The City Clark is directed to file a Notice of Determination pursan To the California Environmental quality Act. y' OGtJCAA10 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW r APPLICATION ?• o 0 y t, > INITIAL STUDY - PART I 1977 GENERAL ry, For all projects requiring environmental review, this fora must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where z?� the project application is made. Upon receipt of this applicaton, the a,. Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Scudy and make ' recommendations to Planning Comnissicn. The Planning Commission will make one .' of three determinations: (1) The project will have no' sigynificant environmental Imact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The project will havo a significant envireraaenta1 impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional Information' report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the i" proposed project. v Date Piled: p Project Title: Alta Loma Storm Drain, Reach I -B, Area V Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: City of Rancho Cucamonga Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: Henry Hurakoshi, Rancho Cucamonga Community Development nepartment Tel. No. (7141 989 -1862 Location of Project: Hermosa Avenue and Vista Grove Street Assessor's Parce} No List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency Issuing such permits: County of San Bernardino, Cucamonga County Water District M tom:: R� %w i PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project:yEiyirjo for ctnrm water Acreage of project area and square footago of existing and proposed buildings, if any: Describe the environmental slattinq of tNe project site including informatior on topography, so stag ty, p ants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): Single family residential development adjacent to and northerly of proposed storm drain (under construction July 19881 The storm drain transverses an existing water course from Alta Loma Retention Basin No 3 easterly to two hundred feet easterly of Hermosa Avenue The storm drain is to be constructed within San Bernardino County Right of Nay. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although Individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact No WILL THIS PROJECT: YES 710 1. rreate a substantial change in ground contours? .. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare' 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, ate.)? 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? _ X 5. Remove any existing trees? How rany? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? _ X Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: MIA 8 Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this proje :t' HJA 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this protect, in cubic yards: 3,000 yd' of tranch and backfill 30. If the project involves the construction of residential units, coea:lete the fora on the next page. CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluaticn to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning_: Division Date: 9- ZZ.gg Signature Title - 73, CM OT LLYCHO COCAY.ONCA PART II - INITIAL S= EiVIRONNEN --01 CRICRLIST DATES_ 7/15/88 APPLICANT: _City of Rancho Curamonaa FILM DATE: LOG NMSU: PROJECT: Alta Loma Storm Grain Reach t_g Are V PROJECT LOCATION: Hermosa-Avenue- and Vi to Grove Street I. LW7RO.7:¢4TAL TNPACTS (Explanation of 811 "yes" and "saybe" answers are required on attached shoots). Mrs MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geoloev. Will the proposal have algnificant results in: A. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relaclonshipt? I b. Disruptions, displacments, compaction or burial of the toil? _ I c. Change In, topography or ground surface contour Satervals? I d The destruction, covering or aodlficarion Of any unique geologic or physical features? _ -- I -_ e. Any Potential increase in vied or voter erosion of soils, Affecting either do or off site coadiconsl I f Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? I g Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as aerchquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground Cailure, or similar hazards? _ I h. An Increase in the race of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource) I I NVdrOlcty- Will the proposal have significant results in: `� (/ / / ,z a` m I iN MI • Change in the charaeccristics of species, Including dlverzity, discribution, or number of any species of plants? b Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X 76" .z YES MAM NO a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing screams, rivers, or ephemeral screen channels? x b. Cheeses in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rata and amount cf surface vacer runoff? x c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? I — x d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? _ x e. Discharge Inca surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? — f, Alteration of groundwater ,ear&c%arIstics? ge Change in the quantity of grmmdvatera, either through direct additions or with. drawals, or through Interference with an aquifer? Quality? Caamcicy? _ X_ h. The reduction in the mount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? — 7i I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as floating or sdchas? x J. AIr Wolin. will the proposal have significant results im= a. Constant or periodic ail- rAssioca frcm mobile or indirect sources? 'X Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? X C. Alteration of local or regional clizatfc conditions, a!faccing air movement, moisture or amperarura? x 6. Siata Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: • Change in the charaeccristics of species, Including dlverzity, discribution, or number of any species of plants? b Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X 76" .z Hfa,a.`: YES Y.AY!S Na c. Introduction of nev or disruptive species of $'*. plants into an area? :K d. Raduction in the potential for agricultural s� % pt :ductlon? Fauna. Will the Proposal have significant results ins A. Change in the characteristics of aPeties, including diversity, dlstrfbucion, or numbers x of any species of animals? i _ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare x or andangarad species of amWIST c. Introduction of ary or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier x to the aigration at sovaaant Of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of ousting £fah or vildlife habitat? x S. P°ool•.ion. Will the proposal have sf;oiflcaaa results ins a Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, daasity, diversity, or grouch rata of x the hu=an population of an ayes? b. Will the proposal affect twisting housing, or x treats a dasaad for additional housing? G. Socio- rconaoic yactors. Will the proposal have significant results in.- a. Change in local or tegiaml socio- atonaaic characteristics, including etonosdc of comertial diversity, tax rata, and property x values? b. Will project costs ba equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, x tax payers or project users? 7. Land Us* and Plannina Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results 1a? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict vith any designaticns, objectives, palicias, at adoptad plans rf any govarnnantal entitles? c. An iopact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consu=ptiv or non - consumptive x recreational epptrtunitiss? ,_ 7(a c 8. Transn_ ort,�tion• K111 the Proposal have significant tuulu ins a• Ces,aration of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing attests, or demand for �_ x a" street construction? y., t. Effec ts on existing parking facilities, x or desuad for new parking? - d. Substantial l'patt upon existing transports- tits, systeeu? x — .V t. Alterations to pruenc patterns of circula- Ilan or oaveemt fl. of people and /or goods? �. x �' t• f, Alterations to or effects en present and :W Potential vatar- borne, rail, suss transit or air traffic! x '^ 8• looraues in traffic hazards to motor vehicle', bicyclists or pedestrians? ' 9. Cultural ge =. Will the proposal have — x Significant res�sltb is,; a. A discurbanct to the integrity of archatologltal, paleottological, and /or hiatarieal rssturtes2 x 10. Wealth. Safari. and Vuissnea ysctors. W111 the proposal have signtfftant _ results in: A. Creation of say health hazard or potential haslch hazard? x b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ x C. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances 1' the _ event of an accident? x d• An increase in the number of individual$ _ or species of vector or pathanogenit organisms or the m exposure of people to such organisms? x e. Increase in existing noise levels? x f ExPaaurn of People to PotenVAlly dangerous no let laveIs? x 8• The creation of obj actionable odors? h. An increase in liahc $r glare? _ -- % Y r ? N ITS ALMS 11. Aesthetics. Wfll the proposal have eignif Scant Yfl re results ulea in: a6 a. The obstruction or degradation Of any scenic Y -� vista or viev? - X :t b. The creation of am asxthetinlly offensive suet — X 17 o. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential steel' corridors? X 12. Utilities and Public Service , Service• Wl the ,too ... I s el need N system, or ,1 ra lle"'CAte ns to the follow:mgt ' a. Electric power? — -- X b. Natural or yatksgad gas? — X C. Communications systs sl — X d. Water supply? X a. Waatawater facilities? X f. Flood control structures? _— X R. Solid users, facilities? X h. Fire protection? _ - X 1. Police protection? X J. Schools? X k. Parka or other recreational facilities? X 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? _ X m. Other governmental services? X 13. Enersr and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have aignlficaot rasulta in: a Use of substantial or esceesive fuel or energy? X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing _ sources of energy? c An incroase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? X d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non- ranawable fora of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? Xr - 7? r ;r II Y!S "i! ° °. e- Subst4tial depletion of any nonrenewable ND of starce natural resource? _ __ 14, Nandatory Ffad_ 1 =5! ,ffleance. x +. %48 the project haw the potential to degrade the quality of the eavirorsenc, substantially reduce the habitat of flab or wildlife species, below s fish or wildlife �Populatlou to drop s4U 'taiming levels, below threatan to the numb 91anc'er animal co�u"ICY, reduce or or restrict the range of a rare or endaajered Floor or animal er 14-4, to aporoact esamples of the Valor periods of, California, ls history or Prebcory? x b, Doer the pralsct have the potential to achieve _^ short -tat -, to the disadvantage of lonbssa, emviroaatntal goals? (A short -ter- ispc%t m. emvironmeat the L on: which occurs is a relatively brief, defiaiciw period of time while long- earn lapa:ts will endure well into the future). _ _ c. Does the project have *Act$ which are itdividually 11141td, x but cusnSatavely considerable? (Cwmastively considerable "'es chat the incremental -!facts of am Individual project are consaersble whoa viewed In tormectiom with the effects of past projects, and Probable future projects). x _ d• Does the project have environmental effects which will taus• substantial adverse effects on human beamge, either diraetly or indirectly? x _ DISCUSSION OF m7Ieo?oQN? ,V, LgALDATIDN ehe above ques oietq plus a diseu ("a, of affirmative aeswars discussion of proposed metitacicn Y co measures), ay :i ai a 9g e ti 1'+S` . . ♦. ,. C'11•'ri'';h ?`!',jv�•`. � W ._ . -....• ,� .Pais J, • III. DETE.tYINASION,� k� N' on the basis of this: initial evaluations ❑I find the proposed projecc COULD NOT have a significant - affecc x on the savironeenc, and a b'EOA:IVE DECLARATION will be prfpared. ' find that although the proposed project could "have a significant 4, affect on the saviro5ment, there will not be a significant effect In this case because, the mitigation measures described on an actachad sheet have been added to the project. A NECATM DECLARATION WILL BE YREPARED. ID I find the proposed project MAY have a significant affect on the savirmeoc, and an ENVIROT. = MACT REPORT is repuirad. < T' Dark— 'Signature 5 Fresident - CD; Cnnsultinn rivil Fnnineers 1•Scle �a sew r ■ ■ — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA „t STAFF REPORT Date: October 5, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Toe Neely, Jr. Engineering Aide Trainee Subject: Approval of the Environmental Initial Stndy, Parts I and II, for the proposed Slurry Seal Program for Fiscal Year 1988 -89 for various City streets and approval of the the attached Resolution and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore. RECOMMENDATION• It is hereby recommended that the Initial study, Part I, Environmental Review Application and Part II, Environmental Checklist be reviewed and approved forrfiling ywith the �County Clerk for the project under theoguidelies of the California Environmental Quality Acc. BACKGROUND /A!KYSIS• In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, projects to mintain existing roadway streets without widening have been predetermined not to have a significant effect on the environment, and are designated for 'Categorical Exemption' from environmental review. Said streets to be rehabilitated have been broken into six districts. The vicinity and site maps are hereto attached. Said improvements generally entail 1) removal and replacement of asphalt concrete pavement prior to crack sealing and placement of slurry seal mixture, 2) asphalt - rubber crack and joint sealing, 3) slurry application, and 4) the repainting or restriping of the pavements for traffic control Res(peecct ly submitted, RHMT /� - Attachment v a RESOLUTION NO. D .� 0 (� & RESOLUTION OF.THE CITY:COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF " RANCHO- CUCANONGA; CALIFORNIA; APPROVING`THU ENVIRONEMTALxIMITIAL'STUOY'ANO - ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL', EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSEO.SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM FOR'FISCAL YEAR-1988 -89 FOR VARIOUS'CITY STREETS WHEREAS, the Ciy Council of the City of Rancho Cu_caoonga has revieved all avallablo, input concerning the proposed Slurry Seal Program for the Fiscal Year 1988 -89; and WHEREAS, said program requires an Environmental Assessment; a,,d WHEREAS; an Envlromental Assessment Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. N"'', THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City 'of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves av ronmental Assessment Initial Study and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Slurry Seal Program for the Fiscal Year 1988 -89. SECTION 2• The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption P1Jrsu4n California Environmental Quality Act. a e 1 ENMONMENTAL REVIEW x APPLICATION Wr1TAL STUDY - PART I MR ,& For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review C the project otttee through the deprtmeat where Division St f awOn is made, Upon receipt of this application, the recommend lions to Piannl g will Cospmission.PaThe Pla°nning the CInitial owlssion twill make one of three daterrafn4cions: (1) The project affil have no siymakeone environmental impact and a Negative Declaratten will a filed, (2) The Project Report have a signiftcant envtromtntal impact and an Envfrenn+enTh IMPact Report x d be prepared, or (3) M addlttonai tnformaticn report hould be project. supplied by the applicant giving further informatior. concerning the Proposed project. Date Filed: Project Title*. S al Praora ro. Fiscal Year 188 e9 applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: City of Rancho Cucamo -na 7 mon a CA 1730 714 9 9 -1862 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: Mika nir„r.._ _. .. _ Location of Assessor's Parcel. N0._ public Streets List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits. 1 r PROJECT DESCRIPTIOR Proposed use or proposed Project:_Thn nrnf r auk and ielnt coal ino ro ons1s25 of ajphalt-rubber and gal acreage of p -oject area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, tf any: dln s tin or Describe the envirorreental scion of the project site including information historicilapor�seenfc safpectsy� lind used of es�rroundinanima,s, any cultural, sheeriptlon of any exlsting structures and their use properties, , an6d the sheets): rho 11MIC r cites are located in develoaea residentialttracts�Karfiary tuner imn _.. _ _ or Is the lect part of actions, wh,ch although Ind- ivldu�ll prsma i9 one a series of cumulative environmental fmpact y as a whole have significant • , 5 VILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO A' 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ it 2. Create a subitantial change in existing noise of produce _ vibration or glare? 1' l 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, ate.)? _ .Y_ m 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? } S. Remove any existing trees? Now many?__ i 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fIammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 2. Noise and vibration will increase at the project site only during slurry .ealino and/or Pavement removal and replacement operations. After completion of aroi ct. noise and vibration levels will return to existing levels 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: xnne 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: 4_5 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: lit C.Y. 10. If the project involves the constrection of residential units, complete the form nn the next page. CFRTIFICATION: I hereby cdrtify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial presented are true and correct that the ofamysknowle knowledge belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation cai be made by the Planning Oivision. Date: ,n_ a . Signature Title a.. U �11 9 r RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION �4 The following information should be provided to -the City of Rancho Cucamonga V$ Planning Division in order to aid the school :dls�rtct in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential, development. Developers are <1 required to secure letters' from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to iscuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract Specific Location of Project: N/A ?eI ■ M PNASE I PPJISE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL i. 1. Number of single family units: Z. Number of multiple �- a; family units: _ 3. Date proposed to —r begin construction: 4. Earliest date of -- occupancy: Model# — and 0 of Tentative S. Bedrooms Pr1ce Ranee ?eI ■ M 2 sue•. CITY Or J"CHO =AMON0A • PART II - INITIAL STUDY MMROW --=AL CHECKLIST DATE? c" "tams „r �a sole APPLIMM: r�ty •.f o> rh r r>mn "g FILING DAIE7 —,LOG RMInERi PROJECT: Sh,rry tpei Drnp > F1 1 VCIIL lgga -ae PROJECT LOM1I047 city of aanrhn P••�a n Yarlmst lY t� St a t I. EYMR0NNMAL IHPACTS (ErplanaticM of all "yes" and "Maybe” assaults art requirad 00 attached shuts). ■ YES MAYBE NO 1. So11s usd CaoiOev. 4111 the proposal have significant results ins a. Unstable greundccsdiclons or in changes in geologic relationships? —_ _L b. Disruptions, displacements, completion or burial of the sell? c. Change In topography or ground surface contour latarvals? d. The dest- uetlon, covering or modification Of any unique geologic or physical features? I e. Any potential Increase in wind or voter arosicn of soils, affsccing either on or off sits condlcons? f. Cnar.ges In erosion siltation, or deposition? g Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - slices, ground failure, or sinilar hazards? h. An Increase in the rate of srtracclon and /or use of any oineral resource? 2. Hvdroloe . 17111 the proposal have significant rssulcs in: ■ b. dhanses in absorption races, drainage patterns, :•`m 'V or the race and amount of surface water : runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood k waters? I _ — L °• z " d. Change in the amount of surface water in any i body of water? X_ e. Discharge Into surface vacar*, or any alteration of surface vatpy quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? �_ Y S. Change in the quantity of groundwater*, either through direct addition* or with — .x; dravals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? X h. The reduction in the amunc of water other- visa available for public water supplied _ X I. Exposure of peop?e or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 7. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect stutter? IL Staticnaty source*? �^ L b. Deterioration of ambient air quality .ind /or Iaterforeace with Cho attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air moveuent, moisture or temperature? X 6. Biota Flora, will the proposal have significant reanits in: A. Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or number of any Species of plants? r r b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, tare > ' oreadsagered species of plants? ,I a. C Changan, in eurrenes, or the course of direction C of flowing streans,'rivers. or ephmaral stream channels? YES YAYSS: NO _ c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? X _- m ^" d. geduceloh in the potential for agricultural L production? �- Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant results in. a. Change in the characteristics of species, Including divarsir /, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? i b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? T. c. Introduction of nei or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier ' to the migration or movement of animals? I d. Deterioration of removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? -�. X S. Population. Vill the proposal have significant results lni a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bucion, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human •opulaclon of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional booing: _ X 6. Socio- Economic Teeters. Will the proposal have significant results int a. Change is Ioeal or regional soelo- eaonemic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, end property values? b. Will project coots be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? —� 7. Land Use and Plannins Considsraelona. Will the proposal have significant reeYlts in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plant of any governmental entities? X c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of .� existing consumptive or non- consunptive X recreational opportunities? Q _ - 9 0 resulc� s Sin= the proposal have significant ;F r +• Ccneratian of auDacaoeSal nvuane7 additional vehicular _ x b. Etfetca oo eXisctn nw acreat tom erug ,[recta, or dgand for -• trine? x e. Ztfscts on +o, pang parkin tae y' d+maad for nev parking? g Sliciee, or d. Substantial impact upro existing transports- — �— tton system? a. Alteration, co present patterns of eireulx- _— cion or sovgmc of people and /or doodsT t• Alterations to or effects on preseai and — �- _ Potential voter- bores, rail, sass transit or air traffic? x 9, increases is traffic hazards to Bator vehicles, ` bicyclists or pedescrians? 9. Cultural l Resources K aignl.ieanc reseal :s 11 the yrcposal have Ins +• A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological. P+leootologSeal, and /or hlscorical resources? _ 10. Health. Ssfeev and Nutaanca Paetora. -- Proposal have aSgotficaoc results In: Kill the a• Creation Of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b• Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ x _ X c. A risk Of ezplosion or release of hazardous substances to the avant of an accident? _ X d• An increase In the number of individuals or species of vector or pachenogenln organisms or the exposure of people co each organlzes? e• lnpraase in aXiscing noise levels? x _ !. Eaposure of people noise levels? to pocencially dangerous x g• The creation of objectionable odors? h• M Increase in light oc g lara? IL " -- A, 8. Will T T'�S -- A, __ _ Jai •, ' ° 1L. Aesthetics. Vill the proposal have significant reseal cs Sa: YES .0 +• D4 obdtruccion or dagradacioo of any scenic vista or view? b• The creation at a4 site? Y Offensive i e. A conflict with the objective of designated or poceoclal scenic cotriderf? _ �• •x 12- Utilities and Publie Se ' have �� t Cos. Vill rho proposal a have a eignlflunt need --% ?' fog nw s sc al to th.a fOLlawinjT F gas, or a• Elsetrie Power? b• Natur a1 or paelugad jas? �" '�� X C. C"Muatcacioas s,at..? -- X d• Were- supply? � --a ' a• Haacwater facilities? _ X f• Flood control structures? _ x -- x g• Solid vasca facilities? _ h• F1-Ts Protsctlan? -- '�• 1. Police Protection? J. Schools? X — R• Parks or aeMr recreational tacllitiest X 1• ?Lintaaenoe Of public facilities, includin roads sad flood g _ X control facllitiasT °•• Other govermencal services? 13. E_er e1 and Searee Resourtu. V111 the Nava signi— -- �_ X pro?ofal ficant results In i a• Uat of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase sources of energy? in dmand upon existing _ �• e. M increase in the demand for development of new sources of anregyi d. M increase or perpetuation of the coaauopcicn Of nos- renewable forms of energy, ',hen feasible renewable sources of energy are available? - � x , ,ll resourc eepaetlon of �: �•- ''T3 °:•'�O ; �'" �icars�nsture? any n°nrenwable or - �`rv•"s' r16. Nandi' ae, COr+'Ftndtn s of -51 act ` .. .. -�•y .. icante. a' Doq the,pro�iet have, eh �-yaal3ty; of the anvir°a nr potential to degrade reduu ehehabltat enc, subscaottnlly alah or'vi1d11Lesh or vlldltte ipeciee, ," eliyoa to aauatilgigg 2wels,Qtbresten to aP q�aber oelresear agimal co�,vy. ty educe } e6COrgarad plant arlec the rang, of a rare or as anima ss+mDlu of the r periods 411tornia history or Prehistor7?erlede of b. Does the project short -term, to sheave the Poiincial to achieve _ X environmental dfsadvancaie of lea enwlraa_eac L goaeav (A aharc -teta impact an the term Impacts dellni Period ofttime to v c raLcively cave impacts will endure vel hue long- ` 1 into the fu c' Doss the project have tore), _ indlvld impacts v x wally limited, but c hic3 are cansiderablol (Cumulacivelv�atively means F Considerable ri chat cle incramentsl effects of Individual project are consldetaule u an tit connection ueuza them eateats of Past uProjects, • °d Probable t d. Do*,, the Project hsv VhIch will cuse e environmental effects x un h�oan bemuse aw' at+ati+l adwzsa etlects is. either directly or ladiractly2 _ rxvrx II. DLSC_'SSION OF X the above quucfans p• us dlatuyDa on ot(ito -• of atfirstive an : to SEE P posed CIClgatlon measures), ATTACHED SHEETS rti 0 DI on the a an ch ;Propolad�proj,cc COLLD Nor h Ave a Z,� I- _JVx Or I gnificsnt of, MARATz .4 0'4 WIll.be prapar:d X p, fInd thtalthlf, OL�Z% the MPosad project Li Affect an 6-`-1%,1r" could h Iva O!ttent. I there will a AlIgnificanc Im thii "$a bec - suac the lot be A SignifLcant eff attached' 'It1laclon act A h cassurgs describad on As *Or -%Ave been added to the DECLAUTILI, ?7LL 1z A Nr pMARED. CA_ '11.! I f1ld the Proposed PlrOJ4QCt MAY have and an 4 significant off-cc 01 EMRO"'NLW L%fPACr U"AT is the I find the Proposed project CATEGORICALLY EXERPT per Article I Date Class I(c). Section 15301 Of the California Environmbntal Qua,9- ity Act. Associate Civil Engineer m 1 It. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation 1. Soils and Geology b. There will be subgrade soils and aggregate base preparation and r- compaction for the replacement of sections of asphalt concrete pavement. 6. Socto- Economic Factors b. Project costs are equitably distributed a=ng project beneficiaries through the implementation of Senate 8111 300. 6. Tranaortation a,b,e,e, 8 g. During slurry sealing operations, traffic and parking will I" crease on surrounding streets near the project perimeter. Alterations to present patterns of vehicular and pedestrian circulation or goods and also traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians during construction can be mitigated by the proper use of roadway warning and - detour signs. 10. Health, Safety and Nuisance Factors e. Existing noise levels will increase due to equipment operations j during construction, but could be mitigated by the installation of noise attenuators and the restriction of hours of operation of equipment. 12. Utilities and Public Service This project x111 leave an interim effect on the present pattern ofVcj circulation of vehicles (i.e., police, fire, school). Such circulation pattern impacts can be mitigated by prior notification to the respective agencies of the proposed street work, giving time, date and duration of said work. I. The proposed project will Improve the pavement surface and sections of pavement subgrade. ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA^ �a STAFF REPORT - Date: October 5, 1988 Y 41 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: James T. Harris, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval to increase traffic signal maintenance rates by 5% due to change to Consumer Price Index as provided for in current maintenance agreement with Computer Service Company to be funded from Gas Tax, Account No. 09 -4637 -6028, Contract Services. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the S% increase in traffic signal maintenance rates as requested by Computer Service ',ompany. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS• A request has been received from Computer Service Company, the City's current traffic signal maintenance contractor, to increase their standard traffic signal maintenance rates in proportion to that experienced by the Consumer Price Index. A copy of the request is attached for your information. An annual negotiation of fee rates is provided for in the current maintenance agreement that expires July 1, 1989. The fallowing is a listing comparing existing and proposed rates: Proposed Existing Monthly Intersection Service $52.50 $50.00 Hourly Wage Rates Standard Overtime Standard Overtime Operations SuperinU.ndent $27.30 $40.95 $26.00 $39.00 Engineering Technician 26.78 40.17 25.50 38.25 Leadmen 26.78 40.17 25.50 38.25 Service Technician 25.83 38.75 24.60 36.90 Lab Technician 21.00 31.50 20.00 30.00 Equipment Rates Service Truck 512.60 $12.00 Bucket Truck 32.55 31.00 Air Compressor 22.58 21.50 The comparison indicates an increase of 5E that, based on fiscal year 1987/1988 expenses with inflation and probability of more accident damage due to increased traffic volumes, is within the current budget of $100,000 for signal maintenance contract services and approximates the change in the Consumer Price Index between June 1987 and August 1988. V CCSR .... Re: Traffic Signal Maintenanee October 5, 1988 Page 2 Computer Service Company, in spite of a recent change in critical personnel, continues. to do acceptable work and is striving to reduce response times especially for emergency callouts 'such as signal pole knockdowns and signal blackouts. They are very cooperative and work well with City staff. Respectfully submitted, RRN:JZ Attachment e �T -r COMPUTER SERVICE COMPANY DIVISION 2230 Cn2T 06INOITXOOPC AVCHUC.,UUCIITOH,.A 9X]1.6229 9067 a„IC2 BOX lICO, lUICCXTOe. CA 9260. A 9 C A 0 0 0 C 17 1 A 1 9 M O H C A A I - 0 0 6. Auguat 1, 1988 In Reference Refer Toe CSC LTA No. 8808DD0152 City of Poncho Cucamonga P.O. Boz 607 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attentions Paul Rougeau Dear Pauli As per the maintenance agreement, negotiations for the coat of services provided are based upon the Conaumer Price Index following the anniversary date of the agreement. The Consumer Price Indez reflects a 4.7% higher amount in June of thia year then the proceeding June of 1987- Below are reflections of the coat increases we propose duo to this Information. Monthly Intersection Service $52.50 Standard Overtime Operations Superintendent $27.30 $40.95 Engineering Technician 26.78 40.17 Leadman 26.78 40 17 Service Technician 25.83 38.75 Lab Technician 21.00 31.50 Service Truck 12.60 Bucket Truck 32.55 Air Compreasor 22.58 We are certain that you will agree that those minimal Increases are in no way subatantial enough to warrant disapproval. Billing will reflect these changes as of the above date unless Computer Service Company is otherwise notified. e �/ Page 2 CSO LTR No. 8808DD01S2 4 if you have any quertiona. Please fool free to contact me at your convenience. Very truly /yours, Dennis Dieter COMPUTER 3ERVICE COMPANY DDted 4 t CITY OF gANCHO CUCAMONGA C%3CnM STAFF REPORT a 'r a Date: October 5, 1488 > :vn To: City Council and City Nenager A From: JOG Schultz, Community services Manager ✓�' By: Karen McGuire- Emory, Associate Park Pla er Subject: Acquisition of North Eant lomuurity Park band Recom,Ondatlon: That the City Council approve the execution of the Purchase ' Agreement and Escrow Instructions for the Catania property and authorize the Community Services Staff to camplete the acquisition process for the future North East Community Park site. - Background: The Community Servicee Department Staff has, at the direction of the City Council, successfully located approximately 48 acres for a Community Park Site in the Etiwanda area. The site, located in the vicinity of the Etiwanda School District at Summit Avenue and East Avenue, is currently under + ownership by three different families (see attached Exhibit A) . Negotiations for property acquisition have been successfully completed by William Murphy Associates, on behalf of the City, with two of the three property owners. The appraised value of all three properties, established in August 1988 by Edward G. H111, was $60,500 /acre. An agreement On the Catania property (33.20 acres) was finally reached at a price of $65,000 /acre, almost lot over the appraised value. _ The acquisition price of the Schmidt 5 acres has verbally been agreed to by the seller as $60,500 /acre. v r 1 99 'i Page Two Staff Report October 5, 1988 These figures translate to a combined total of: CATANIA Alex J and Mary M 18.20 ac @ 365,000 /acre . $1,183,000 Catania Enterprises 15.00 ac @ 565,000 /acre . 975,000 SCHHIDT 5.00 ac 0 63.0.500 /acre 702,'00 38.20 ac $2,660,500 The remaining 10 acres of property owned by the Steritz Family, is currently in escrow with Joe Dilorio at $42,500 /acre. Staff is negotiating with Mr.' Dilorio to acquire this piece thus providing the 48 acres of community Park land as shown in Exhibit A. The Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions included are for the Catania property. Document& for the remaining parcels will be coming to you once they ara• executed and signed. i 1v 0 }� -', - '.N;: >'Y.'.• T ',lYx`K ^�Y�- '4}' -b C = -: -> w :Iy: /� ^' 'v' ;CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _t • - ;' STAFF`REPORT �' �`� rFO Date.- October 5, 1988 - To: mayor, Members of City Council, and City Manager From: Joe Schultz, Community Services manager -, Subject: Agenda Tian: Policy for the Naming of Park anj • Recreation Facilities P?COMMIM&TSON: To adopt the Park and Recreation Commission LC policy on the naming of park and recreation facilities. BACKGROUND: Research of Park and Recreation Commission Minutes of 1984 !{� finds there is no City policy for naming park and recreation ' facilities. There was considerable, discussion on the topic in 1984 but the coneensue was to have guidelines rather than M policy. `ro , At a recent Park and Recreation Commission Meeting it was R suggested that these guidelines be revised somewhat and forwarded to you to adopt ac policy. The City is growing.- and policy can formalize issues for the future. Respectfully Submitted, Jo ph chintz Co unity Scrvic a onager JS:tp i .:r a r a 6" CITY OF RANCUO CDCANONGA The following policy is recommended for use in the naming of park facilities for the city of Rancho Cucamonga. These guidelines will be used to insure consistency, while minimizing confusion in the selection of names for new and existing park areas. The following factors that may be considered are: e If a park nits is located adjacent to a school and the school has hsen officially named, then the park may be named after the school. This will minimize facility identification confusion and encourage the intent of the City's General Plan which recommends the ochool /park complex developments. • If the school has not been officially named the City shall york with the School District to develop a mutually acceptable name for the school /park complex. Contests by students to name the school /park complex should be encouraged. e If a park site is located near a significant geographical, historic and /or other physical element, and is not adjacent to a school, the park may be named after the significant feature. e A park site may be named after an adjacent street, or an commomorativa event if it is not located adjacent to a school site or a significant physical element. This would encompaso such park facilities as the Rancho Cucamonga neighborhood Center, Red Hill Park and Heritage Park. s A park site or certain area improvements within park facilities may be named after individuals or non - profit organizations if those individuals or organizations contributed significantly to the development of the specific park or the general park system within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Examples of this would include Lions Park. /oa t FS+ LY� 4z�-':5;$L:�rX. "�- .. �.• -i'�,. �Yt'". \'.: t•,:,yY. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT Date: October 5,;1988 To: City Council 'and•Cfty Manager From: Russel VH.,1' 50r`. City Engineer By: Gideon V. gra,'G , Civ11 Engineer Subject: Authoriie. toe- advertising of `Notice Inviting Bids' for the Amethyst Street Reconstruction, Storm Brain and Traffic Signal Project at 19th Street, to be funded from the Systems Development Fund, Account No. 22- 4637 -8747, and Transportation Development Act, Account No. 12- 4637 -8606. REU NEMTION: It is recommended that City Council approve the plans and specifications for Amethyst Street Reconstruction, Storm Drain and Traffic Signal, and adopt the attached resolution authorizing thu City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKOR(AWANAI.YSIS: The subject project plans and specifications have been completed. Estimated staff and construction is S39OO,DOO.00i ($160,000.00 ore hoc istreet work, $127,000.00 for ggthe storm drain construction and $83,000.00 for the 1983 and signal). tobr 24,e1989awithtthenBid will be Opening at 10 :00 a.m. on November 1, 1988. Re�csubmitted, R1D: GYA: pa � , Attachment 0 a RESOLUTION NO. b $ - i{ 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE AMETHYST STREET RECONSTRUCTION, STORM MVIN AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND PJMORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS �Y WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucaonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Ramuho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. HEREBY RESOLVES that CITY specifications preesentedOby the City of GA Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for AMETHYST STREET RECONSTRUCTION, STORM DRAT_N AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT ". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucawo—% San Cernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY ra1YEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamnga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 10:00 a.m. on the 1st day of November, 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the °AMETHYST STREET RECONSTRUCTION, STORM DRAIN AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT' in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read imediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C. Rancho Cucamonga, California. Bids must be wade on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, 'Bid for Construction of AMETHYST STREET RECONSTRUCTION, STORM DRAIN AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT ". the provisionspofYCalifornia ELabor Code,sDiv given Parita7,iChapterd1. with Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor 1s required to pay not less than the general prevailing rite of per diem wages fer work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work 1s performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diew wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regtrd, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of l6Y s, California is required to and has dtterwined such general prevailing rates of per them wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages - 'Sre or, file Line Office the . Clerk of the camoraa CaliforniaRancho nd area available t Wan interested party on reques.- The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy Of such deteminations to be hosted at the Job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($21.00) for each laborer, wOrkman, or mechnnrc employed for each calendar day or portion thareof if such laborer, workman, (_ or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages e, hereinbefore stipulated for any work done unde the attached contract, by him �,. or by any subcontractor un Labor code. der him, in vlolattc of the provisions of said Code as amendedtbycChapptere971 ,AStatutte$ of Provisions 1939. and in accordancefwi the h the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, proyerly Indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. subcontractor eaploying17tradesaenain any.apprent ceable0occupation to apply to he Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 1S percent in the 90 days prior to the requast for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it Is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or C. When the Contractor prc4ides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractnr is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered /DS apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors an the public works site ae making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shell constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this Lontract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of tha Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five (225.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in tht execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herelnbefore mentioned, fo each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor vore than eight (8) hours I. violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or Lidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the sacra is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucaonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (IODS) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to flftr percent (SOU of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a /6(0 • T. �i ••1':�� J"An,iw„T t: �:1. :'✓.sY'.'fl F. .n. .. . r •�: certificate that he'cirrles.compensatfon insurance covering his employees.upon . L work to be done uhder.contract.whtch maybe entered into between'him and the'° said City of Rancha'Cucamongai for the -construction of said'work, r No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal fore has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall poHass a Clas °A' License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions-Code, Section 7000'et. seq.) aU rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract 1s awarded. The work is to be done in accordancn•wlth the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City:of Rancho_ Cucamonga on fila:in the Offlce'of. the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road .Rancho Cucamonga, California: Coples'of the plans and specifications, - available aV the office of:the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to.the City of Rancho Cucamonga and pay'eat of 535.00, said $35.00 is nonrefundable. i< Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be piled when said request is accompanied by payment T stipulated above, together with an additional nonretobursable payment of S15.00 to cover the cost of piling charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. /D 7 ,� _� �4 . - .{;4,; ;,f,,•.� � Sr^µ -r -� By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali fornia. Dated this day of ,, 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the,Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of 19 r4yor ATTEST: City er ADVERTISE ON October 17, 1988 October 24, 1988 l08 x� V w CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October S. 1988 �C TO: City C uncil and City Hanger FROM: Russell H. Maguire. City Engineer BY: Malt Stickney. Associate civil Engineer do" SUBJECT: Fthill Portion Or nUeMa Foothill Boulevard and of San Bena dioRoadnd setting the date of public hearing for November 2. 1988 RECOImiNDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adoVt the attached resolution setting the public hearing for November 2, 1988 for the vacation of San Diego Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to north of San Bernardino Road. In addition sdbe published ten days priorhto the City Clerk x Hearing. resolution to BACKGROUND On June 22, 1988 the Planning Commission approved Tentdtive Parcel Hap 10238 with a condition that San Diego Avenue be vacated from Foothill Boulevard north to the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -ray. The appl n , (Ra Cucamonga fer to water District, s now requesting that the vacation ANALYSIS Bernardino Road and Is beings used paved between access between those two streets. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan calls for San Diego Avenue to be vacated while maintaining access easements for those properties which currently abut San Diego Avenue. On September 14, 1988 the Planning Commission determined that said vacation would conform to the Specific Plan and recommended that n Foothill Boulevard vacation mm Respe ,fatty submitted, e bm RNN:NS: w ' Attachment !j(•vrN, a -•f i•"f,. _ '}xY.�e'1G � r. " \��✓�3l- �' \��f rtY+ ( ' r rt f ' Y RESOLUTION NO. $$ IPO p r +t ,. A RESOLUTION OF THE'CITY,COUNCIL OF THE CITY Qr RANCHO ;j,• CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ` Z DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTIO11 OF SAN DIEGO �+ AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND NORTH OF SAN lKy BERNARDINO ROAD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaxonga as follows: i SECTION 1: That the City Couneil hereby el ±cts to proceed under .} Section 93TiTT=eseq., of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941. v SECTION'2: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to vacate a portion of San Diego Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and North of San Bernardino Road a City street, av shown on Nap No. V-084 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which 1s attached hereto marked Exhibit 'A and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 2nd day t of November98� at 7:30 prm., in the Lions Park Community Center Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its determining whether said City street is necessary for present or prospective street purposes. i SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to be posTi d conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least 10 days before the hearing, not more than 30 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall + have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in lettering not less than one inch in height: 'NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET'. SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and excep obi ns, fi arty, for existing utilities on record. ' SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City-Clerk 3 shall atts15 -5— a same, and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once is The Dail in C �Re oo��r�tt, a newspaper of general circulation published the o ntario, a Mornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Y e t r T /� v DESCRIPTION OF PORTION OF SAN DIEGO AVENUE TO BE VACATED Parcel •A• Commencing at a one inch pipe marking the canterlLne intersection of Foothill Boulevard and San Diego Avenue as said intersection is shown on plat recorded in Book 3S, Page 90 of Records of Survey, Records of the County of San Bernardino; thence NO°1.45 -W, 60 00 feet along the centerline of San Diego Avenue to a point on the northerly line of Foothill Boulevard said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence N89056135•W, 30 00 feet along said northerly line to the westerly line of San Diego Avenue; thence along said westerly line, NO°O1'45•W, 148 35 feet; thence NO °20'35 "E, 319.44 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave easterly, having a radius of 388 1 feec, thence northerly along said curve 42 14 feet through a central angle of 6 ° 13.16• to a point on the easterly line of the property conveyed to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District by deed recorded April 3, 1979 in Book 9656, Page 489, Official Records of Said County, said point lying on a non - tangent curve concatae northwesterly, having a radius of 807 69 feet. radial to said point bears S63059154'E; thence northeasterly along said curve and along &aid easterly line 178.52 feet through a central angle of 12 039149• thence leaving said easterly line, N30 011'41• E, 86.90 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly, having radius 256 5 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve 21 74 feet through a central angle of 4 051.26 ", to the beginning point of a non - tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 50 00 feet, a radial to said point bears S19 0351140 W; thence easterly along said curve 28.84 feet through a central angle of 33 002'38'; thence N76032.35•E, 40 55 feet to a point on the easterly line of San Diego Avenue, said point being the beginning of a non - tangent curve concave northwesterly having radius 316 5 iaet, a radial to said point bears S71° 13'40•E; thence southwesterly along said curve 63 10 feet through a central angle of 11 25'21'; thence S30°11.41•W, 106 49 feet the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly, having a radius of 328.1 feet; thence southwesterly along said curve 170 94 feet through a central angle of 29° 51106•; thence S0020'358W. 319 32 feet; thence S0 001145 ^E, 146 17 feet to the northerly line of Foothill Boulevard; thence N89 °56135.17, 30 00 feet to the True Point of Beginning Contains 1 06 Arces more or less Parcel •B• Co ®encing at a one inch iron pipe marking the centerline intersection of San Bernardino Road and San Diego Avenue (formerly Carnelian Street) as said intersection is shown on plat recorded in Book 35, Page 90 of Records of Survey. Records of the County of San Bernardino; thence N88 027111•, 45 58 feat to the westerly line of San Diego Avenue and the beginning point of a non- tangent curve concave westerly, having a radius of 256 5 feet, a radial to said point bears S750511321E, thence northerly along said curve and along said westerly line a distance of 50 06 feet through a central angle of 11°10'57• to the True Point of Beginning, thence continuing along said curve 38 74 feet through a central angle of 8 °39'16•• thence NS°41'45•W 193 84 feat to the southeasterly line of Southern Pacific Railroad Right -of -Way; thence N410 151010E, 41 06 feet &long. said southeasterly line to the centerline of San Diego Avenue; thence 85041145.6, 221.87 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave westerly, having a radius of 286.3 feet; thence aoutherly_ along said curve 50.03 feet through a central angle of 10°00'16'; chance, leaving said centerline. M73027.170V,.23.85 feat to the beginning of a tangent crrva, concave southerly, having radius 50.00 fast; thence westerly along said curve 6 84 feet, through a central angle of 7050,11• to the True Point of Beginning. Contains approximtely 0 17 Acres. Parcel -G- A strip of land 14,00 feet vide lying easter line; ly of the following described Co®incirg at a one inch pips surking the centerline intersection of Foothill Boulevard and San Diego Avenue as said intersection is shovn on plat recorded in Book 35, Page 90 of Records of Survey; Records of the County of San Bernardino; chance N00010450Y, 60.00 along the centerline of San Diego Avenue to a point of the northerly line of Foothill boulevard; thence 5890 561350E, 30.00 fat to the True Point of Beginning; thenca N00011450V, 148.17 feet; thence N0o20'36•E, 304.44 feet arose or less to the soathvest corner of Lot 14 of Nap of Subdivision "b: of Cucswnga Vineyard Tract as per plat recorded In book 20, pegs 45 of Naps, Records of said County COnrsins spproxiaately 0.15 Acton KQ- S„-t- _- Viac. FM; Nv IT VACATION OP SAN DIEGO AVENUE CUCAMONGA TG DrMON A � l i t m TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 10238 w�Ymaw ♦• I R Iw /wy (YYT� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERmG DIVISION 7�p�� +Te +ter+ L. �a�GTION OP SAN DIEGO A • + +a1i'.: t7c�ilbun Sr +��,y " -'.I! 1 �J� 1 K 7 7�p�� +Te +ter+ L. �a�GTION OP SAN DIEGO A • + +a1i'.: t7c�ilbun Sr +��,y " -'.I! ORDINANCC NO. 371 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO Q)CAMNG14 CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO OUCA)riWA MUNICIPAL ODDE BY ADDING A M CHAPTER 8.22 ENTITLED aPROEIBITION OF QHLOROFLUOROCARBON PROCESSED FOOD PACKAGING., A. Recitals. PQ.LOUBt THE CITY ODUNM OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C)CAMINGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS (i) Problems in disposing of solid waste and a lack of solid waste landfills affect all persons and all local, county and state governments. One significant source of solid waste is discarded polystyrene tom food packaging. Manufacture of such packaging creates an additional, significant environmental problem in that chlorofluorocarbons are utilised in their production. (ii) Available scientific evidence indicates a strong probability that the family of substances known as chlorofluorocarbons degrade the earth's protective layer of ozone, when discharged into the atmosphere, allowing increased mounts of ultra i.olat radiation to penetrate the atmosphere. This increase in ultra- violet radiation Fusee an immediate danger to human harith. life and the eaviroment. Available scientific evidence indicates the strong possibility that the resulting increase in ultrawiolat radiation bad contributed to, and will continue to contribute to, the incidence of skin <oncor and other serious illnesses. (iii) One significant source of chlorofluorocarbons currently being released into the atmosphere is the manufacture of certain polystyrene foam food packaging products which utilise chlorofluorocarbons an blowing agents. (iv) The people and the City of Rancho Cucamonga support state, federal and international polities banning all nonessential uses of chlorofluorocarboas. Until such policies become law, responsible action to reduce the rel6cm of chlorcflucrocarbons into the atmosphere, and to increase public awareness with respect to the potential ham caused by these substances, must be undertaken at the local level. (v) It is the intent of the City Council to reduce the mount of chlorofluorocarbon processed food packaging products purchased and used by and within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in order to reduce, to the greatest extent Possible. the health hazards created by the release of chlorofluorocarbons into the atmosphere. Ordinance No. 371 Page 2 (vi) The City of Rancho Cucamonga supports and encourages -voluntary waste reduction through the adoption of voluntary programs by food vendors as a aeons to achieve a fifty percent (5DS) reduction in the use of non - biodegradable and non - recyclable food packaging, and all other fora of food related litter, wherever possible. D. Ordinance. PQ.kAN3t THE CITr COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMtEA DOES HRRE8r ORDAIN AS SECTION it Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Coda is hereby emended by the addition of A new Chapter 8.22 to read.:.. words and figures, as follows "Chapter 8.22 "Prohibition of Chlorofluorocarbou Processed Pood Packaging "Sections: 8.22.010 Definitions. 8.22.020 CPC - processed food packaging prohibited. 8.22.030 penalties. 8.25.040 Civil remedies evwilabls. 08.22.010 Definitions. "A. 'CPC - processed food packaging' mama any and all food packaging which uaaa any chlorofluorocarbon as a blowing agent, or otherwise, in its manufactura. "8. 'Chlorofluorocarbons', or 'CFCs', are the family of chemical substances commonly referred to as such, and contafniag carbon. fluorine and chlorine, and having no hydrogen atoms and no double bonds. "C. 'Customer' means anyone purchasing food or beverages from a restaurant or retail food vendor. "D. 'Food packaging' means all bags, seeks, wrapping, boxes. containers, bowls, plates, trays, cartons, cups, straws and lids which are not l-.tended for re -use, on or in which any foods or beverages are placed or packaged on a restaurant'a or retail food vendor's premiaos. "E. 'Food vendor' memo any restaurant or retail food vardor within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Ordinance No. 371 Page 3 s"P. 'Prepared food' some beverages and foods which are propared on the vendor'■ promises by cooking, chopping. slicing, mixing, freezing. squeezing, or otherwise, and which require no further preparation to be cousumed. Prepared food does not include any raw uncooked asst product or }+, fruits or vegetables which are not chopped, squeezed, nixed, or othomise processed in sons fashion. "C. 'Restaurant' memo any establisucent located within the City of ^{ Rancho Cucamonga, selling prepared food to be eaten on or about its promises by } customers. 'Reatmmat' includes sidewalk and all other outdoor food vendors. r "H. 'Retail food vendor' memo any store, shop, sales outlet, lunch truck or other business including a grocery utore or a delicatessen, other than a a restaurant, located within the City of Reecho Cucamonga, which provides or sells takeout food. "l. 'Supplier' mama anyone supplying food packaging to a restaurant or retail food vendor within the City of Rancho Cueamonga. + ".1. 'Takeout food' •ems prepared foods or beverages requiring no further preparation to be consumed and which may be purchased in order to be 'Y consumed off the retail food vendor's promises. 08.22.020 CPC - Processed Food Packaging Prohibited, `: "A. Restaurants "1. Except as provided in sub - section 3 hereof, no restaurant shall prviids prepared food to its custonate in any CPC - processed food packaging, nor shall any restaurant pt=cbam. obtain or koey nay CFC - processed food packaging for such purposo. "2. As to any food passaging obtained after September 1, 1989, each restaurant shall obtain from each of its suppliers a written statement signed by the supplier, or by an authorized agent of the supplier, stating that the supplier will supply no CPC - processed food packaging to that motsurant, that the supplier will note on each invoice for food packaging supplied to that restaurant that the packaging covered by the favoice is not CPC - processed, and it shall furtber inch 4 the identity of the packaging's manufacturer. -3. All contracts between reataurants and suppliers thereto entered into after September 1. 1989. shall include provisions that the supplier will supply no CPC - processed food packaging and that the supplier will truthfully state on each invoice for food packaging supplied that said packaging is not CFC - processed and it shall further provide the identity of the packsglug's manufacturer. Pailure to comply with each provisions shall constitute a material breach of the contract. IL- � ?h Ordinance No. 371 Page 4 "4. Restaurants &hall retain each supplier,, written statements referred to in Bub- section 3, above, for one year from the last date of receipt of any `Cod packaging from that supplier. "B. Retail food vendors "1. Except as provided in aub- section D hereof, no retail food vendor shall provide takeout food in any CYC - processed food packaging, nor &hell auy retail food vendor pare base. obtain or keep airy CPC - procesaed food packaging for the purpose of packaging takeout food. 02. All retail food vendors shall segregate, in their warehouses or other storage areas, food packaging used in their takeout food operations, from other food packaging which may be noted on the premises. All food packaging maintained on each retail food vendors premises shall be label ed with language clearly indicating that CRCs have not been utilized in its manufacture. "3. All contracts for the purchaso of takeout food packaging entered into after January 1, 1990, shall comply with the provisions Of Section 8.22.020 A.3. hereof. "C. Regelations applicable to all food vendors. "1. It shall be unlawful for any supplier to make any misstatement of material fact to any food vendor or to any representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga regarding the use or ooa -use of CFCs in the manufacture of ary food packaging supplied, or to be supplied, to any food vendor in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. "2. Each food vendor shall file a statement at the time it reams its business license, truthfully declaring that it is in compliance with this Chapter. 43. All statements and documents required by this Chapter shall be made availakle for inspection by the City Manager or his or her designated representative. Ic shall be unlawful for anyone having eustodv of such documents to tail or refuse to produce such documents upon request by the City Manager or his or her desigated representative during normal business hours. "D. Erceptiona "1. The City Manager or his or her authorized representative m, az,mpt a type of packaging from the requirements of this Chapee_ upon a showing satisfactory to the C+ty Manger or his or her designee that the "k4ging has no acceptable non - CPC - processed equivalent and that imposing the requiremanta hereof would cause undue hardship. Said documentation shall include, but is not limited to, a list of suppliers contacted to determine if non -CPC - processed substitutes ere available. 1 /� Ordinance No. 371 Page 5 "2. Food packaging required to be paid fu& or shipped under a contract selected into prior to September 1. 1989, in exempt free the Provisions of this Chdpter. "E. l'he City of Poncho Cucamonga shall not purchase any CPC — processed food packaging, nor shall CPC — processed food lacksging be knowingly utilised at any City — sponsored avant occurring within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on and after September 1. 1988. "P. The City Manager is authorised to promulgate regulations and to take any and all other actions reasonable and necessary to enforce this Chapter, including, but not lWted to, inspection of any ford vendor's promises, during normal business to verify compliance. "0. Volmttary and mandatory compliance. "It in the intent of the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga to achieve a fifty percent (50x) reduction in the use of CPC — processed food packaging by March 1. 1989, and a ninaty percent (90x) or greater reduction thereafter. In order to achieve this reduction, compliance with the provision¢ of this Chapter shall be on a voluntary basis until September 1. 1983. On and after September 1. 1989, the provisions of this Chapter shall become mandatory without further notice. 08.22.030 Penalties On and after September 1. 1909. it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter. Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this Chapter or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be domed guilty of an infraction and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable as follovst "A. A fine not exceeding One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for a first violation; "J. A fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for a second violation occuring within one 1 year; "C. A fine not exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each additional violation occuring within one (I) year. "Each such person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall be demo, guilty of a separate offence for each and every day or any portion thereof duriug which any violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter in committed, continued or permitted by much person. firm, partnership, or corporation, and shall be domed punishable therefore as provided o this Chapter. lr7 Ordiaance.No. 371 Page 6 - . "The provision w of this Chapter shall not;` be construed as" permitting conduct %"not prescribed herein and shall not affect the enforceability of sny other applicable provision of law. "8.22.040 Civil Remedies Available. "A violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter shall constitute a, nuisance and nay be &bated by the City- through civil process, by uses of restraining order. preliminary or permanent injmction. or in any other saucer provided by law for the abetment of such nuisance." SECTION 2: The Citw Council declares that, should any provision. section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered r., declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction. or by reason of any promptiva legislation, the rssaiuing provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall retain in full force and effect. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clark shall cause the ssss to be published within fifteen (15) days atter its passage at least once in The Daily Amore, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Outario, rtlifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. w 1/V I r. ''- r_ut'�'°- z- n•.:1i".FT��'J -,'.: ,!ij•1: v'.. .... ,, . -_, 1t" , - -_ .. .- sY�- „,p6_r -:*i: rf - -. ORDINANCE NO. 375 ,. AN ORDINANCE OF THE'CITY COUNCIL OF THR CUTr 02 RANCHO - CUG%H=A. CALIFORNIA. AMENDINO TITLE 17, CHAIM 17.18 OP THE RANCHO WCUMA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MMOPMENT U17HIN THE ALQDIS'1-PR16LO SPECIAL STUDIES 201.'S WHEREAS, on the 21st day of September. 1988, the City Council bold a 'i'r' y public hearing pursuant to Section 65664 of the California st dal noticed r Cevernmont Code. v. loll The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as ovst ” SECTION it Section 17.18.040 E.2. (c) in amended to read as follow: (r) No emergency facility, or other type of structure that attracts atabers of people, is open to the general public, or provides oseentiai w: community services shall be permitted within the Algaist— Priolo Special Studies g! Zone. SECTION 2: This r4unc•1 finds that thin amendment will not advorsoly • affect ttie envizument and hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 31 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clark shell cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. `1 _ 1« 1� CITY OF RANCHO C(ICAMONGA A. STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1988 TO: City Council and City Hanger FROM: Russell 4. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE ANNE)UTION OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 12 INCLUSIVE OF TRACT NO. 8583 LOCATED ON MONTE VISTA COURT EAST OF EASTWOOD AVENUE TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RECOPPOIDATIOM: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with the Annexation of said lots to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS In October, 1987, in response to an appeal by property owners to staff decision to eliminate a traffic island on Monte Vista Court and an interest by the miners for landscaping in the island, Council directed staff to review the feasibility of constructing landscaping on the traffic island in question. It was determined that for this landscape project to be constructed, the City's pcligy of annexing the benefited properties Into a landscape maintenance District should occur. Budget constraints in the 198748 Capital Projects Budget made it impossible to pursue the landscape project during that fiscal year. A neighborhood meeting was held on July 26, 1988, with the owners of the lots which would directly benefit from the construction of the landscaping. That meeting addmissed the owner's concerns and questions including the City's requirement of those properties benefiting from the proposed landscaping to be annexed into the City -wide landscape maintenance district (Landscape Maintenance District No. 1) along with a discussion of possible landscape treatments which could be employed. It was also explained that an annexation of the benefiting lots would Include all the lots considered and that while future years assessments cannot be determined at this time, the 1988 -89 fiscal year assessment is approximately $25 per lot per year. C�-(D TS`4,11ROOGM 12 OCTOBER S. 1968.' 1 PAGE 2 A petition was circulated Yameng the owners affected. Those signing the petition expressWa willingness to join the maintenance district upon - construction of the landscaping. Of the 9 parcels affected, owners of 5 parcels signed the petition for a 67f response willing to join° the district. v' ° A vote of the affected owners is not required for the vannexation to occur. The City Council begins the process through a public hearing. The petition detereines`;where there is a desire for the owners to join the maintenance of a landscape project in the island. if annexation of the properties occurs, staff will review the 1988 -89 Midyear Capital Projects Budget and reprogram the funds necessary to design and construct the project. Attached for City Council approval 1s a resolution ordering the work in connection with the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Lot Nos. 4 through 12 inclusive of Tract 8583. the owners of property in the subject tracts have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88 -543. Resp_ fu submitted. RHM: ao Attachments Y RESOLUTION 110. qq - �o / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE ANNEXATION OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 12 INCLUSIVE OF TRACT 8583 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LOTS 4 THROUGH 12 INCLUSIVE OF TRACT 8583 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Californi did on the 7th day of September, 1988, adopt its Resolution o! Intention No.g ^543 to order the therein described work in connection with the Annexation of Lots 4 through 12 inclusive of Tract 8583 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -543 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement% was duly and legally posted in the time, fora, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -543, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and runner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and deriveditherefromcandiaid for CityaCouncill havingwnw benefits to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -543 be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer Ts ere y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment i5-745-Engineer's Recort are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that sa;d assessments shall not begin until after�0 percent of said tracts have been occupied. CITY OF RANCHO CJ1CAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. I Annexation for Tract 8583 (Lots 4 - 12 inclusive) SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to >inex all new subdivisions into landscape Maintenance District Ho.l. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 8583 ( Lots 4 - 12 inclusive) as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Pancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this re port to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs All improvements will be constructed by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Currently the approximate cost per dwelling unit is $25.00 per year. It is anticipated that such costs will remain the same with this annexation. Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. �a-3 SECTION 5. Assessaieot Diagram - A copy of the "propposed assessment diagram is attached to'this report and labeled Exhibit A by;this reference the diagram 1s hereby incorporated ` within the text of thWreport. SECTION 6. Assessment ' 1 i �' Iaorovements for the District are found-to be. of general benefftRtoall :YN lots within the Dlstric$.and that' assessment.shall be equal: for, cach,unit: a `F Where there 1s more than one dwelling unit per'lot or parcel of assessable` °l land, the assessment for,Ceach` lot or, parcel shall be proportional- to;the number of dwelling units'per r , lot o parcel. 7 The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine.the i actual assessments based upon ; the -actual costs incurred, by the City during "the prevfous flscal'year which -are to be recovered through assessments as required i y the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon, the proceedings. 4. Every year to May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. I properties and improvements to be included within Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1:! MAINTAINED AREA TRACT D/U RREFT Se—FE -- —F�_— —u- 8583 9 Monte Vista Median - -- 21,664 2 (Lots 4 -12 Incl.) i .. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 is u• u ,II n 6 1 n• 10 5U U Ct r * n n t 0 O • a C a n ,...• r. a �✓ t Y � jj �r • it :�� '13 � ��a •10 L eAi� i 1 IL \ • 1 e • yH • n C fJlr i i n • � /f � °' p.. ter• W •io„ m r+ °e �' n �� / r Annexation of Lots a thru 12 Inclusive of ltacl 6383 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Itc Alto� CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA title; c° d mot: I 6 ENS �INEERING DIVISION T CM — ! 11CINITY MAP 11 \,11 page DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: m.. ..,..,,, , STAFF REPORT V October 5, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Walt Stickner, Associate Civil Engineer ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE ANNEXK TRACT NOS. 8369, 8805, 8806 LOCATED EAST 07 ROCHESTER AVENUE BET1E EN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND BASE LINE ROAD, TO LANDSCAPE KIINTENAHCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RECOMMEL'OATION: It is recommended that Ci V Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with the Annexation of said tracts to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGRDUND /ANALYSIS In November, 1987, Council, in response to property owner's interest in getting landscaping improvem>entt along the east side of Rochester Avenue, directed staff to review the feasibility of such a project. It was determined that for this landscape project to be constructed, the City's policy of annexing the benefited properties into a landscape maintenance district should occur. Budget constraints in the 1987.80 Capital Projects Budget made it Impossible to pursue the landscape project during that fiscal year. Following adoption of the 1988 -89 Budget, a ntighborhood meeting was held on July 27. 1988, with the owners of the three tracts which would directly benefit from the construction of the landscaping. That meeting addressed the owners coneros and questions including the City's requirement of those properties bentfiting from the proposed landscaping to be annexed into the City -wide landscape maintenance district (Landscape Maintenarce District No. 1) along with a discussion of possible landscape treatments which could be ehployed. It was also explained that an annexation of the btree benefitin3 tracts would include all lots within those tracts and that while future years assessments cannot be determined at this time, the 198849 fiscal year assessment is approximately $25 per lot per year. Respectf tfUUX submitted. r war Attachments i ANNEXATION -OF TRACT; 9369 880 OCTOBER 5 PAGE 2 A petition was circulated among the owners affected. Those signing- the petition expressed 'S'wfll Ingness to join the maintenance dfst ict upon construction of the lindsca r 252 Parcels signed the I ffng. Of the 412 parcels affected, owners of district. • tfon for a 61% response willing too Ofn the A vote of the affected owners Is not required .for the annexation` to cur, The CftY--Councf) begins *he !�e process through petition determines' whether there a public hearing. Is A-'desfre 'the for owner Join the maintenance district and- thereby Support, the maintenance" s�of a landscape project an tWe&st side-Of Rochester. If annexi groperttes occurs, tion Wthe staff will review the 1988-89 Midyear Capital Projects ti udget and reprogra project. a the funds necessary to design imd construct the Attached for City Council app,.,oval Is a resolution ordering the work In connection with the Annexation of Landscape Hafntenance-District for Tract Nos. 8369, 8805, and 8806. The owners of property t No subject tracts have been notified the Of the public hearing by mayil.in attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution mo. 98-545 Respectf tfUUX submitted. r war Attachments i RESOLUTION NO. $ E - (a J V A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION VITH THE ANNEXATION OF TRACTS 8369, 8805, AND 8806 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINN. ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACTS 8369, 8805, AND 8806 WHEPLU. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California did on the 7th day of September, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88 -545 to order the therein described work in connection with the Annexation of Tracts 8369, 6005, and 5806 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88 -545 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally posted in the time, form, mnnnr, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -545, cccording to the names and addresses of such cwners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Cleric; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the Cit1 of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga tat the public Interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Cowxil hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88 -545, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer isTrcTy finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessments— n— tFe—tngineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation for Tracts 8369, 8805 and 8806 SECTION 1. futhority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tracts 8369, 8805 and 8806 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Hap as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Rlar, and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to tho subject tract mar or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on th_ individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs All improvements will be constructed by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work .tandards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Currently the approximate cost per dwelling unit is $25.00 per year. It is anticipated that such costs will remain the same with this annexation. Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. /36 A �4 - i � - - v1— i9 Rat W - Rt 0 SECTION 5-. AssessmentlDfigni iK A co?y of tSw,ero osid- assesj labeled ExhibitA ; 9 Solent diagram is attach d'to this report.ard Y- this -reforenco the diagram is hereby incorporated,' within the.toxt.of this report. xii SECTION 6. Improvements forAWDistrict a I re found,to be of general benefit to all lots within the,Dfst;1Ct•&ndLL th&t assessmcnt'shall be equal for-each Unit'. Where'there Is MOM-thon-Am etch unit per lot or parcei of assessable land, the ass see r""teAch lOt'Or Pakels,shsll be proportional to the nupter of dwe" ling units -per lofyorlparcel.. The City Council w1l746ld"a"-'pu-blfc hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments basedl,duon tual lncLrred YV costs by the City during the Previous fiscal year whf&,arito'bae recovered through assessments as by the Landscape and Lfghtlri,�Pct of IgI2. required SECTION 7. Order of Events I. City Council adopts Resolution of prelininary Approval of City Engineer's Re;art. 2. City Council adopts Resolution Of Intantfon to Annex to Oistrfet _- Public hearing date. and sets 3. City Council conducts Public hearing, considers all testimony and &OtermfnLs to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City En.-fneer files a report Nth tha city council. S. Every year in June. the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the Individual assessments. 1 Properties and Improvements. to be included %Jth this Annexation to Landscape Natntenance District No. 1: 1 / 30- NAWAINED AREA TRACT D/U S_ a. Ft• �Fa• � �- 8805 99 Rochester Ave. - -- 12,826 5d 8806 122 Rochester Ave. --- I5.235 69 8369 191 Rochester Ave. -- 23.760 108 412 -- 51,821 235 1 / 30- ,T F CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Duller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ERVIROUKENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13812 - PULSAR - Appeal subdivision of 154 single family nlotsponv 71.33 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwande Specific Plan and the Low Residential General Plan Designation (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located west of Etiwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highland Avenues - APR: 225- 161 -35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55, 61 and 225 - 171 -01, 09, 10, 17. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 88 -16 - PULSAR - Appeal o e g a Planning Commission's on s ec son approv n request to reduce the minimum lot depth from 100 feet to 94 feet and 95 feet to two lots in conjunction with a residential subdivision of 154 single family lots on 71.33 acres of land located west of Etiwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highland Avenues - AVN: 225- 161 -35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55, 61 and 225 - 171 -01, 09, 10, 17. I RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoomends that the City Council conduct a pull c earing and receive all testimony on the project. After receiving all input, staff reconnends that the City Council deny the appeal requesting the relocation of "C' Street 6 feet to the north, and uphold the appeal regarding 'r Street and direct the applicant to relocate 'F Street to the east side of the existing residence, and connect 'K' Street with Summit Avenue, subject to Planning Commission review and approval. In addition, staff recommends that a condition be added to the project requiring the applicant to join a Mello -Roos District for fire protection. It. BACKGROUND: On August 24, 198.9, the Planning Commission reviewed anmously approved Tentative Tract 13812 ind Variance 88- 16. In reviewing the proposal, the Planning Commission noted that the collector street cutting through the project, C Street, was originally proposed through the middle of an existing lot along the western portion of the site (see Exhibit "D" of the Planning Commission staff report) . After working with the property owners and staff, the applicant subsequently revised the alignment of 'C" Street to run along the northern boundary of the existing residence (see Exhibit 'C' of the Planning Commission staff report). The Commission felt this would make for a more logical development of the existing lot at some point in the future. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: TT 13812 8 VA 88 -16 - PULSAR October 5, 1988 Page 2 Following the Planning Co..t� :on meeting, two appeals were filed with the City Council by area residents. The first appeal was filed by the owners of the existing house to be preserved on Lot 76 within the subdivision. It was their feeling that "F' Street should not be located along the west side of their asidence due to the large number of trees planted in that area and their desire to retain the pro perty encompassing Lot. 76, 105, and 106 (see Exhibit "C" of the Planning Commission staff report). They feel that alternative designs are possible that would relocate "F' Street and preserve the land they wish to retain in its present condition. The second appeal was filed by the homeowners of the existing house located at the southwest corner of "C' Street and 'G' Street- regarding the safety of a street close to their house and the lack of a block wall requirement. As proposed by the applicant, 60 feet of dedication will be provided within the tract boundaries for the construction of 'C" Street. As a collector street. 66 feet of dedication is normally required. The existing residents feel that "C" Street should be located entirely within the tract boundaries and that they should not have to provide an additional 6 feet of dedication when they decide to develop in the future. III. ANALYSIS: A. OF Street ": During the Planning Commission meeting, no scuss on took glace regarding the possible relocation of "F"' Street, between A" Street and "%" Street, to the east side of the existing residence on Lot 76. As a result, no input is available at this time from the Planning Commission. The applicant, however, has been working with the homeowners to provide alternatives to the approved alignment. These alternatives have been included in your packets for reference (see Exhibits '8 -1" and 08 -24). If the City Council feels that additional review of the appeal request is •arranted, the Council may wish to refer this item back to the Planning Commission for consideration. Staff can support either alterrative alignment. 9. "C Street ": In discussing whether 'C' Street should be re eca 6 feet to the north to provide the entire right -of- way within the tract, the Planning Commission noted that, under most circumstances, the applicant would only be required to dedicate and install a half street along the property boundary. With the development of the adjacent property, the entire right -of -way would then be dedicated and the road would be improved to its ultimate width. The Planning Commission felt that the 60 feet of dedication provided by the applicant, in conjunction with the road being fully improved from curt to curb, was acceptable. The Commission further noted that this arrangement benefited the Rustad's property by 1) requiring significantly less dedication and 2) full street improvements (3S - Y CITY COUNCIL .SVFF REPORT R`: Tr 13612 S. VA 88 -16 - PULSAR October 6, 1983 Page 3 fret Curb -to -curb. The parkway could be fintshed off when the adjacent parcel is subdivided. The issue is further complicated by 0.e fact that the zppellant's property is located in the Count, hence, the rtr_.ht- of -wny cannot be dedicated to the City. This wonid prevent placing the parkway In the usual landscape maintenance district. C. 'K' Street: There was no discussion at the Commission nearing reja— rd ink connecting 'd" Street to Summit Avenue (see Exhibit C ). the appellant has lWicated to staff that tliey ara requesting this connecti m to provide future residents with a second access to Summit. There appears to be sufficient distance for the connection; however, the precise location of this connection would have to be carefully revieweJ by the FJigine ±ring Division to insure proper spacing of intersections Along Summit ca,slstent with the City's access control policies. Condition 2, as presently drafted, only requires the construction of Summit from the intersection or 'M" Street easterly to the intersection of Etlwanda. The portion o, Sarnit Avenue Kest of 09' Street was not needed at this time to service the tract as proposed; theref. -a, in -lieu fees were required by Condition St. If "K' Street is connected to Sumit, uten the conditions of approval sbauld be modified to require that the full length at Summit Avenue be construction. n. Mello -Roos O:striet: Ourlrg the preparation of the Planning oem ss'on e—R soTut7bn, a condition regaring the -applicant to Join a Mello -Roos Benefit Amsestarmt District for fire protection was inadvertently omitted. Therefore, regardless of the action taken by the City Courcll on the two appeals, staff recoarends that a condition of approval be added to the project that reads as follows: 'Developer shall commence, p.trticipate in and consummate, or cause to be commenced, participated in, or cocsummatEd, a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District (CFO) for the Foothill Fire Protection District to finawe a ;ire station to serve the enve1Gf=nt. including land facilities, equipment and operations and maintenance. she simttor shall be located, leslgred and bwilt to all specifications of the Foutkiil Fire Protection District, and shall becoms the District's property upon completion. The equipment shat; be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of Zhe station, t.5e developer shell comply with all apnlieable taws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the Distrrct and the developer by the time of recordation of the final map.' /36 t!4 1§416 V.z clry'c I R RE: 1 12,-&'VA" V'w"PULSAR Ch - Octobe. 5; 19 Page XReslly's ra ull City ity or 88:.%I,ko Attachments: Exhibit Letters of, peal Exhibit "6'`. ,Or Straet A Al ternatiy2i Planning C0im1s1'f06 Kfnutes of August, 24, Set Planning Comigslen Staff Report of August 24, 1988 Planning COWSSIon Resolution of Approval Aug. 30* 1988 Rancho Cucamonga City Councils We wish to appeal the Planning commissions decision approving tenitive tract number i— /38/3— B Ilie_Hl an and �r�f% "c6�es• one ar-d "" 1 i -w4e, Etiwandar Ca. 91739 <714) 899 -1918 = UC c 0 6ri,IGc - uc••.,o.•ICU, n.v ,c u•sroR AUQ 311988 M 38" CInro: , ICA 4P 0A e Mr. Mayor and Councilmembers Mr. & Mrs. Andre Rusted 12366 Highland Avenue Etiwanda, CA 91739 APB # 225 - 161 -57 Saptember 2, 1988 We are herewith filing an appeal to the Planning Commission's de- cission on Wednesday, August 24, 1998, approving item "P" Environ- mental Assessment and Tentative Tract 13812 - Pulsar. As property owners and residents of the immadiato area affected by this development, we are very worried about the construction of a collector street appx. 34 feet from our house. Our biggest concern Is the safety aspect such a street would impose so close to our house, and without the benefit of a blockwall guarding us against speeders and reckless drivors. We do not think a blockwall is too much to ask for, since every house in this tract adjacent to this road will be protectod by a blockwall. We realize there is no provision in the law forcing the construction of blockwalls along collector streets. However the City has always made the construction of such protector walls a stipulation at planning moetingo, as a review of other simi- lar streets in Victoria and other tracts will show. We feel that unfamiliarity of the law concerning city vs. coup property compelled the Planning Commission to dismiss our request and vote in favor of the developer. A simple solution to this prob- lem in our opinion, would be to move the collector street an addi- tional six feet to the north, so it is totally an city property. We would keep our proper setbacks (propane tank etc.) as county law stipulates, and be able to enjoy the protection of a blockwall. The City would receive a finished roadside rather than 6' X 330' of brush and weeds. And the developer would not lose a single lot, since buil- ding sites # 111 through 119 all exceed the minimum depth of 100 feat. Wo respectfully ask, that our appeal be granted for the above men- tioned reasons. Sincerely, / Rustad- - I ,3 � Exs�i•�r �-i C1 103 NRN Y/ q{ ,I", � 78 j�.: •r re:, r 106 t Ns•K F� i r IINK }rNM R/N- IMY YMN IWV a0 al 92 Q a{ a! 75 T{ is 72 T1� 110 1' ! .l -'� q7 C I �� . • Yre• wr � � w r�� SNr M y .v w. N�J _ I � 1 ' • O 1u.M iNl MMK 1p✓ K 9MJN MN fi' t46X MNK idUK '41rN - 1 ,w r qa T N I Si 57 N 59 a0 -41 92� af- H a7 as {p MM4 I • J _ SO {9 k 47 IS si 1 r 57 Y rr.0 9rar wo Y� tlN 9wK '•M w Y h r I - •II pftlM , rIKY � wr III � 1 Yo . L 0 1 0 R1 r .✓•• Y Np✓ !'wY •+MY • IrN✓ a.KV . aC10M { II w t•0.• 112 113 s u+ 113 116 m [is ue uo 9 1 4 �) Ilm✓ SS s.-� r -ate, 1i If 922 nv• J Y ` 13% cl,nl OF rmi. T� 4w/a Li RANCHO CUCAMUNCA PLANNING DIVISION EXHiBrr. a - -• SC (ID 1 '�` NaP49I'W lb pl •7i^�["G� q2 I 79 I 8 1 0 ql W � 9• wN4 �•INVaKIM�MNV�MMY-•NJ 97 96 9) 94 9) 82 91 90 I a9 .IAN jl /I �I� ^VMM1MNM�`V `1111 +Ww�bw'1(,R. 1 1 103 NRN Y/ q{ ,I", � 78 j�.: •r re:, r 106 t Ns•K F� i r IINK }rNM R/N- IMY YMN IWV a0 al 92 Q a{ a! 75 T{ is 72 T1� 110 1' ! .l -'� q7 C I �� . • Yre• wr � � w r�� SNr M y .v w. N�J _ I � 1 ' • O 1u.M iNl MMK 1p✓ K 9MJN MN fi' t46X MNK idUK '41rN - 1 ,w r qa T N I Si 57 N 59 a0 -41 92� af- H a7 as {p MM4 I • J _ SO {9 k 47 IS si 1 r 57 Y rr.0 9rar wo Y� tlN 9wK '•M w Y h r I - •II pftlM , rIKY � wr III � 1 Yo . L 0 1 0 R1 r .✓•• Y Np✓ !'wY •+MY • IrN✓ a.KV . aC10M { II w t•0.• 112 113 s u+ 113 116 m [is ue uo 9 1 4 �) Ilm✓ SS s.-� r -ate, 1i If 922 nv• J Y ` 13% cl,nl OF rmi. T� 4w/a Li RANCHO CUCAMUNCA PLANNING DIVISION EXHiBrr. a - -• SC (ID , r q2 ql q0 H 9e 9T % 9! 9{ 93 9Z 91 90 69 • ✓ - � e1My' 4FI.T rt «w 7(pK VVV 1g1K iMK�N«P H'iIwJd NwK II,.V ,tl1. KE N «N Nov 1.K s 4 1 •tlN� f HfK• 6! v 96^ Mr RsM,t MI _ Tt 10 h .so 61 62 63 64 66 75 74 0= 71 )n 69 136 67 1 ! ` � 76 :l� �ttl Krl ItYI( AtlK Yw( lb. IN.( 61NN fwK ,KtlX.) I ) y ')• , �xwt \__ V . 1 � HAf I! i I IW . «s �.M 1 loe ;�� I , H f 1 1. tl T F hN J II/. YI«K _ M n n „ 1}O4p IIYN IHfK ; 0 �•-- -'�>' 6b) INOS«N ' rK 3Y 6e E9 60 �I s2 -N 83 66 ` 1-- 3 '• `a- 1� t 60.. 49 O Ii 6y 13 1 ftHN 1 1 KNr tY10w 1f«! AMP ll!! t pV � 33 •NC saP l .f. yI t00bP'fM Is fJNv All ` — F / � + • 1 � 1 frt 119 9 AI. � JeoOV VKJV 7 III • an1 / t t • : `.NV k 1 RI Ir+,v _ 11 i A n— M n14 1'wr us us ryYY 1fNM ,u6 FNCK 3 120 • ttJpl r _ut rt X � 'i{ I Vf °l,MW ti. 71 A 1 I !fF 1 f. .. � •'r , � � t9 a .. ... ( 123 130 ` \ tt Vv Narrt -i CITY COY rmNl.. zp�a RANCHO CUCAMONGA -�tr- „`LE, wP- PLANNING DIVISION EXH►Brr1 e-z SGALF _ Mr. Martin pointed out that the second floor elevations of the houses on lots 5 and 6 were lower than the trail behind. fl There being no further CO=Cnt, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Buller then stated that he heard the direction of the Commission to be S that conditions S. 11, 12 be modified in accordance with the handout, and add a Modification to condition 3 to specify a 6 foot high masonry wall and add that the design of the wall and landsceping should be reviewed by the Design Review Comlttee prior to issuance of building pemits. • Motion: Moved by Blakesley, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the Rosolution h recommending approval of Environmental Assessumnt and Tentative Tract 13810 with the above modifications. Notion carried by the following vote: y AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHtTIEA, EMERICK, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONENS: MCNIEL - carried t 8:40 P. N. - Planning C°dlsslon Recessed 8:55 P. N. - Planning COamissfon Reconvened f f f f f Cha1r=an McN1el Joined the meeting at this tine. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 88.16 - Pul SIR - A request to reduce conJunctt°n with a resid ant lal subdivision of feet for two lots in 154 single family lots on 71.33 acres of land located west of Etlwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highland Avenues - APN: 225 - 161 -35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55, 61 and 225- 171-01, 09, 10, 17. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TD-ACT 13812 - PULSAR - A res en a -S v s an o s n a ram in the Very Low Residential District (1 -2 dwye111ng units per acrc)ooflihe Etiwanwe ling Specific units Plan and the Low Residential General Plan Designation (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located west of Etiwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highland Avenues - APN: 225 - 161 -35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55, 61 and 225 - 171 -01, 09, 10, 17. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and indicated four clerical corrections on the Resolutinns, Public hearing was opened. Planning COmMissfon Minutes _8_ August 24, 1988 is ff Gary Andreason, Andreason Engineering representing the developer, discussed the history of the project during the past 2 years. He V if there were fees available to assist in underggroundfng the pputilitiestalong ' Highland. as whyothe CityewsHasking for feet doff -site Improvements through .; through the Southern California Edison rlg.Nt -of -way under condition 5. He r. also felt that item 11 was unfair because the section of Summit Avenue referred to is in the Etlwanda Drainage area and the property is not located s in the Etiwsnda Drainage area. He felt the City shculd pay for putting in the drain. He also icdicated that it was never the developer's intent to remove the garage indicated in the variance request. If the Planning Commission refused the variance for the lot depth, then thay intended to request a variance on setback. Chairman McNiel Indicated the development was in an underdeveloped area and therefore it was necessary to take Into consideration ail property in the area and the required inirua.,.Yture. Engineering must plan in advance to avoid future problems. Douglas Lyon, 12477 Ironbark Di ive, Rancho Cucamonga, wanted to Plow If the connection to Highland was in the plan. Mr Murphy confirmed it was in the plan as a temporary connection until the freeway goes through. He stated that initially there would be a connection to Highland, and one to Etiwanda via Suemit. Eventually there would be another connection to Etlwanda throuO the collector, and when Day Creek Boulevard 1s constructed there would be another cccess to Day Creek Boulevard. Andre Rusted, ioa Rancho erooaalong dderstoodo sidewalks w•lS were to put in the new road bordering his property. Julie Rusted, 12366 Highland, Rancho Cucamonga, indicated she was concerned with the density and felt that the density was calculated by dividing by gross area on one side of the subdivision and by the net area (less proposed freeway and roads) on the other side of the subdivision. Chairman McNiel pointed out that part of the subdivision was within City boundaries, while another portion was in the County's area. He asked staff what the zoning was for the County portion. Mr. Murphy responded it was zoned R3. Commissioner Chit :ca pointed out the developer was gaining a half unit per acre over County standards in exchange for conforming to City design standards and undergrounding of utilities and fees. Mrs. Rusted further commented that the street doesn't benefit her, but they need to give up 6 feet of the northern side of their property before they can subdivide. She therefore wanted the road moved north 6 feet and finished with a block wall on her northern boundary. Planning Commission Minutes -9- August 24, 1988 1 YJ thMr. e Murphy responded that as the street is currently designed they do not have Rustadldecideftotsubdivide their in tHs parcel incathe future,athe city iwould requesMrs. the 6 feet for sidewalk and wall. The full street with curb and gutter would already be in place. Jim 'rest, 12996 Victoria avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated a listing of recor.ended names was provided by the Historic Preservation Committee to the Plana g Department and questioned why the listing was not being util'zed. f _- Commissioner Chltlea stated that the Planning Commission rarely ever sees the names. a Jacob Battleste, 12353 Highland, Rancho Cucamonga, sated he was concerned how he would have access to his property. Mr. Murphy explained that currently Mr. Battleste utilizes an access driveway coming up from Highland. The driveway serves 3 houses. The new street would be adjacent to Mr. Battieste's property, so there would be the ability to access. Mr. Battleste then asked if there would be a fence to keep others off his property. Wayne Blanton, 703 Birch Lane, Upland, real estate broker who assembled the parcels for sale to Pulsar, sated that they had redrawn the project 20 times as it went through many Design Reviews. Originally every lot an the western side was 10,000 square feet, but because of street relocations, they had to reduce the lot sizes. There being no further comments, public hearing was closed. Chairman McNfel commented there ware several points to address including Mr. ofdM andnthe Southern California tEdisonerfgh of -way one-half nd he north one -hal of C Street and he storm drains. He stated it has been Planning Commission Policy to attach in -lieu fees in order to insure that undergrounding of utilities, drainage, curbs and gutters, etc. got done. This applies to improvements adjacent to and possibly across the street from the new tract. In the case of a development already being in place across the street, the Commission had missed that opportunity. These actions may be contested to City Council, and typically they support the Planning Commission. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed that the way the Resolution was written was consistent with policy and what the Commission had done In the past. Commissioner Chitfea agreed. Chairman McHiel then pointed out that when here were 2 developable pieces of property, each property commonly contributes one -half of the street. in this case the Pulsar development would be developing the entire street minus the southerr parkway - 6 feet. The Rusads wanted a wall without giving up the 6 feet. Planning Commission Minutes -10- August 24, 1988 / [SDI N .. y Coanlssfoner Emerick pointed out that the Rusted's could be a lot worse off if they had been asked to dedicate 33 feet for one -half the street. I Commissioner Tolstoy asked if they were suggesting that in return for the Rustad's dedication of the 6 feet, the developer would be asked to supply the wall. Commissioner Emerick agreed. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that in light of the fact that the stredc was not located on the center line of the 2 pieces of property and the Rustad's weren't befog asked to dedicate 33 feet, he felt it was a fair trade. Chairman MCNiet aSKed how Mr. Battfeste's property was affected. Mr. Iturphy stated the entire street in front of his property was fully dedicated. Mr. Buller asked Mr. Murphy to explain how the Masts° plan fit 1n, since the Master Plan didn't reflect the front -on consideration for the two properties. Mr. Murphy explained that they could have a solid wall up to a maximum of 3 feet high up to the property line. They could also have a 6 foot high combination wall with the top 3 feet being open, such as wrought iron. Mr. Buller then said he felt it was important to point out that 12 would not be possible for Mr. Battteste to get a solid masonry wall higher than 3 feet unless it was set back outside the front yard setback. Commissioner Blakesley felt it was lair to leave the street where it was, adjacent to the Rustad's property. Commissioner Chitfda agreed that if the Rustad's wanted the wall, they would have to dedicate the 'i feet, and the relocation of trees and a tank in propane the dedicated are'. wauld be the Rustad's responsibility. She also stated she did not like the Idea of putting walls across front She yards. felt it would not enhance the nefg,borhood to wall off one or two front yards. Chairman MCNiel concurred. Chairman MCNfel next addressed Mr. Frost's comm nts on street names and asked if there was d proposed street naming list in planning. Mr. Buller conflr^ed that the Planning Department did have the list. Commissioner Chitiea stated it was nice to be sensitive to historical aspects when naming streets. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed. planning Commission Minutes August 24, 1988 Chairman HCHtel next asked Bcrrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, to address Mr. Andreason's comments regarding the Southern California Edison right -of- way. Mr. Hanson agreed that Mr. Andreason was correct in stating the conditions Countydwithout street 1n thesoiddle.CiT�lra tartedit to see felt appropriate development In for him to pry his half. This had been dons in the past. The William Cyan their existing 4evelopme t to 0AJ C streets eek Boulevard. Edison There corridor s edencesforrit am! Engineering felt it was the appropriate way to go, Commissioner Chitlea recalled that it had been a condition in other projects. Chairman Mepiel reopened the Objected to the side wall adjaccntbtocthe street. to ask Mr. Andreason if he Mr. Andreason stated he had been told he could split the radvay and take 33 feet Of gender usly designed etie project tncl dinyatheaentirree satreettand he felt it was unfair to ask him to put up a wall as well. VOM willing sto dedicate the 6tfast, tieeyy aCommission ted the developer per to uilduthe 6S foot wall. Chairman McNiel pointed out that the Commission was protecting the public intarest by trying to get the sidewalk, parkway and wall. Mr. Andreason painted out that they might be willing to negotiate if the Rustad s were willing to quit claim the ingress and egress right -of -ways. condition thhatlthe all be would had to right to ppealtto City Council. Mr. Andreason again reiterated they had provided 60 feet for one street ,.s the edge of the property and an entire street on another boundary of the property and they had done their part. Cyrus Nassiri, Pulsar Develooment, stated they were willing put up the wall if the Ru:tad s would quit claim the ingress and egress area. Mr. Silva pointed out that condition 14 of the Resolution already provided that before a map could be recorded, the quit claiming would have to have occurred. Commissioner Chitiea asked who would put in the sidewalk and landscaping and when. She stated she did not want to see 6 feet of dirt and a block wall. Mr. Buller asked if they could dedicate it to the City. planning COmmission Minutes _1E_ August 24, 1988 W r Mr. Andreasan stated they had had their first reading at L FCO for the annaxatton and had to develop A notes and hounds legal description on any property being annexed and transferred from the County to the C:�y Nith that e gave to LAFCO all the title reports, grant deeds and'urderl� ny documents for the property to be annexed. This 6 foot portion was not included in those documents. The final reading from LAFCO is set for September 21. He felt it vould have to' be worked out between the attorneys from nw City and the County. i- s• Ralph Hanson said he felt sonothing could be worked out. ar Chairman WNW asked if it went through the subdivision would the process be delayed through LAFCO. Ralph Hanson stated it would considerably delay them through LAFCO. Mr. Siiva stated that if is were made A grant of easement, the process would be simple• However, f it were to be dedicated in fee to the City, the City would own property in the County and would have to pay taxes o n that property. If the City proposed taking it in fee As A roadway, 1t would be necessary to include it with the annexation and take it through LAFCO. It would be quicker to take an offer of access easement. Ralph Hanson agreed. If the dedication would come, it could be handled by the Engineering Department. Nil. Andreason stated another option would be to only N-4 5 feet of parkway on the southerly side and not build out the full parkway improvenonts through thtt strip. Chairman Mc Niel asked if language could be generated for the Resolution. Ralph Hanson stated he did not feel additional language was necessary. He felt it could be dealt with at the time that any dedlutton from the County wouli cone, and not be a part of the current Resolution. Commissioner Chitiea stated the minutes should reflect the Commission's intention regarding that strip. She further stated she did not want to reduce the parkway. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Notion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Slakesley, to adopt the Resolutions with amendments proposed by staff. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ••••• COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY COMMISSIONERS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: NOME Planning Commission Minutes -13- - carried August 24, 1988 5` s■ — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 24, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13812 - PUEMM---W—r—esITe—nfraT-s—u5civI Mn of single am oTt coon 71.33 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 -2 dwelling unite per acre) of the Etlwanda Specific Plan and the Low Residential General Plan Designation (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located west of Etlwanda Avenue, between SL=it and Highland Avenues - APH: 225- 161 -35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55, 61, and 225 -171- 01, 09, 10, 17. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESWdT AND VARIANCE 88-16 - PULSAR - A reques o reduce e m n tuaa o eet to 94 feet end 95 feet for 2 lots in conjunction with a residential subdivision of I54 single family lots on 71.33 acres of land located west of Etlwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highland Avenues - APN: 225 - 161 -35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55, 61, and 225 - 171 -01, 09, 10, 17, I PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the subdivision map and Variance and issuance of e Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: Overall - 2.16 duelling units per acre. East rn po�Efon - 1.58 dwelling units per acre. po Western rtion - 3.5 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Very Low Residential (1.2 dwelling units per acre) and County Residential 3 South - Vacant; Very Low Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) and County Residential 3 East - Vacant; Very Low Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Vacant and single family residential; County Residential 3 /VO ITEM E 8,F M PLANNING CCM41SSIC STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13oi2 - PULSAR August 24, 1988 Page 2 D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre and very low residential less than 2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and Open Space South - Freeway East - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and Open Space E. Site Characteristics: The site is located on the north side of g an venue across from the Windrows Village of the Victoria Planned Community. The project is bounded on the south by the future Foothill Freeway and the north by Summit Avenue. The property slopes roughly 4 percent from north to south. There is an existing single family residence located at the northwest corner of the site that will be incorporated into the design of the subdivision. II. ANALYSIS• A. Background• The development of this property is unique in that the eastern portion of the site presently falls under the Very Low Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) designation of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The western portion of the project is presently located outside the City limits within the City's Sphere of Influence. It.is designated by the City's General Plan as Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) but is currently under the jurisdiction of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant has, however, processed a pre -zone application for a Low Density Residential District which _was approved by the City Council on June 1, 1988. The application for annexation will be heard by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) on September 21, 1988. The original plan submitted by the applicant consisted of 151 single family lots on 64.82 acre of land. The western portion of the site was designed in much the sage manner as the current submittal. The eastern portion of the site, however, was designed using the optional standards of the Very Law Residential District, providing smaller lot sizes and two park sites of 3.34 and 3.71 acres. Upon review by the Design Review /y9 PLANNING COMIISSIO .TAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13812 - PULSAR Augguust 24, 1988 Pa 3 Committee, it was felt that the configuration of the site and the collector street bisecting the site was not conductive to the optional standards. Subsequently, the applicant redesigned the eastern portion of the site to provide 44 single family lots, using the basic standards, averaging 27,581 square feet in area. In addition, the applicant was able to acquire a parcel of land at the northwest corner of the site resulting in the addition of 28 additional single family lots (see Exhibit 'D'). Following the review of the revised plans, Staff met with the property owners of the existing single family hous:s located adjacent to west tract boundary. The residents expressed concern about the collector street bisecting one lot and being close to the other single family house. As a result, the applicant has redesigned the plans to shift the collector road to the north of the second single family residence. B. General: The current proposal submitted by the applicant indicates lots ranging in size from 7,210 square feet to 56,SO0 square feet in area. The western portion of the lot, under the Low Residential designation, has an average lot size of 9,435 square feet in area. The eastern portion of the iite, under the very Low designation of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, has an average lot size of 27,581 square feet in area. To provide a transition between the two density ranges, those lots that front -on or rear -on to the eastern half of the site have been enlarged to more closely assimilate the largcr lots. C Dessi�i__gqnn�Review Committee: On May 19, 1988, the Design Review ZoaWIlen Ciii eafi 1Croutil) recommended approval of the Project subject to the 'L' Street connection to the -CO Street connection being resolved prior to scheduling this item for Planning Ccmission consideration. This item has since been resolved between the applicant and staff and is depicted on the current proposal (see Exhibit 'C'). D. Technical Review Committee: On July 19, '988, the Technical ev 0_Camm ee reviewea tne proposal for consistency with all current City standards. The major issue with the development of the site was the provision for permanent access. Ultimately, the site will take access both from Etiwanda and Day Creek Boulevard via &=It Avenue and the extensions of 'C' Street A temporary access has been proviled across the future Route 30 Freeway and is being allowed at the Locust/Highland Avenue intersection. This access will be removed and the land will revert to the underlying lot upon construction of the freeway. / 6 PLANNING COHHISSIC STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13012 - PULSAR August 24, 19e8 Page 4 I r Over the past several months, however, ouch discussion has centered around whether or not adequate dedications exist to 1. construct Summit Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue, eased upon information provided by County surveyors office, examination of title and deed reports, and the location of structures in line ` with what was assumed to be pracise alignment, it appears that ? sufficient dedication for Summit Avenuu is not available. On August 17, 1988, the City Council approved the possible future use of condemnation action to obtain the necessary off -site rignts -of -way for the construction of Summit Avenue from the project site to Etiwanda Avenue. E. Trails Adviso Committee: On iky 18, 1988, the Trails +" r spry omm tee rev ewe the proposed development. At thst time, the Committee recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The lot lines and equestrian trail between lots 9, 17 and 18 should be realigned to the west to provided a crossing to the northwest corner of the intersection of 'C' and '0 Streets. 2. The local trail on the north side of lot 18 should be eliminated. 3. A local trail should be provided along the south side of lot 23. 4. A local trail should be provided on the south side of lots 19 and 20. 5. A 1. With local trail should be provided on the west side of lot Highland Avenue this trail should Lbe Street relocated nto the wet tract boundary. 6 A local trail should be provided along the south side of lot 13. 1 The local trail along the east tract boundary need only be 10 feet in width. F. /ariance Request: In conjunction with the subdivision app ca on, applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the minimum lot depth on lots 104 and 105. A Oevelopment Code requires that lots be 100 feet in depth. Lots 104 and 105 are 95 and 94 feet in depth, respectively. The Variance request PLANNING COWISSIO' 47 REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13b.t - PULSAR August 24, 1988 Page 5 f, stems from the shifting of Or Street further to the west in order to preserve the existing garsye located on the east side of Or Street. As proposed, both lots 104 and 105 far exceed the City's requirements for lot width and lot size. The lots, however, could be brought into conformance with the Development code by relocating the garage and shifting 'F' Street to the west. Therefore, direction from the Planning Commission is requested to determine if the Variance should be granted or if the garage should be relocated and Or Street be shifted to provide lots 104 and 105 with the minimum required lot depth. G. Environmental Assessment: In completing the Environmental could , as entlffed two items that potentially could haven adverse impacts on the project - flooding and noise. With the land north and west of the project being primarily vacant, staff is concerned that the project my be subject to flooding during extreme stones. As a result, a condition has been added that flood protection shall be provided along the northern tier lots within the tract or that easements be obtained to provide the necessary flood protection on the properties north of the project. With the south boundary being located adjacent to the future freeway right -of -way, the site may be impacted by noise levels in excess of City Standards. An acoustical analysis has been prepared for the project which indicates that an 8 foot high oarrier, located along the south tract boundary, will reduce the noise levels to within the acceptable City range. With the addition of these two mitfCation measures included in the Conditions of Approval, staff feels that a Negative Declaration can be issued for the project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for tie Planning Commission to approve the a an and the subdivision, facts to support the following findings mast be made: A. Variance 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship In consistent with the objectives of this code; and 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not generally apply to other properties in the same zone; and /Stl- 6� �1 PLANNING COWIISSI0' TTAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13b42 - PULSAR August 24, 1988 Page 6 3. That strict or literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the appilcant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone; and 4. That the granting of the Variance erould not constitute of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations of other properties classified in the same zone; rind S. That the granting of the Variance will emit be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfe:•e, or materially injurious to properties or improvrolents in the vicinity. :'.• P.. Tentative Tract: 1. That the Tentative Tract is crmsistent with the General Plaa, Developarant Code, and Specific Plans; and 2. The design or ilaprovmentu of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plar, Development Code, ana Specific Plans; rind 3. The site is Physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and 4. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and e.voidable in]!n'y to humans and wildlife or the habitat; ant, S. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and 6. The design of the tentative tract will not corftict with any easements acquired by the public at %ege, now of record, for access through or use of the pr,rµrty within the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: The item has been advertised to th,s taily Report newspaper as a public hearing, the site has been pos : , an notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet. V. RECOMENDATiON: Staff recommends that the P1rnning Comission cons d r e aTT public input. After heuring all testimony, the Comission has the following options: A. Approve Tentative Tract 13812 and Varian 88 -16 and issue a Negative Declaration; or Mi •4 ;iva,T•:e•,ti r•-i �r..:r:J'�J - — •-• — .I. PLANNING C(IMISSIC 'MU REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13812 - ,PULSAR August 24, 1988 Page 7 B. Approve Tentative Tract 1.1812, issue a Negative Declaration, deny Variance,88 -16 and add a condition on the Tract Yap that the garage structure shall be relocated and 'F' Street shall be shifted to provide the minimum lot depth of 100 feet. R submi , BB:91:mlg Attachments: Exhibit W - Site Utilization Nap Exhibit 'B' - Conceptual Master Plan Exhibit °C' - Subdivision Yap Exhibit •D' - Previous Subdivision Nap Resolution of Approval for Variance 88 -16 Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 13886 s i r I � 1 I _ W CITY OF IMP oz RA CC;C• AMONG TITLE, � PL-kNNI.)IG D{VISM E.XHIFAT A ScALL• a �SS y� I FES 1 r I � 1 I _ W CITY OF IMP oz RA CC;C• AMONG TITLE, � PL-kNNI.)IG D{VISM E.XHIFAT A ScALL• a �SS J' _ (-r -- - { Ii cin, OF ITEm, i &Aim RANCHO CL'Gk'%IO';GA TITLE: —= FLA.\\I\G DI\'LSI( E \HIfiIT -, 5`ALt• 16i� 1 Fr AIr i 'onoa t U � 1 I K 1 I � 1 1 I cin, OF ITEm, i &Aim RANCHO CL'Gk'%IO';GA TITLE: —= FLA.\\I\G DI\'LSI( E \HIfiIT -, 5`ALt• 16i� 1 Fr AIr V J M)WrlI CITY OF rrE%it - ZE -ow_? — R.a\CHG CLCk.%IONGA rm.E: aa1V,6XfvAfAp PL.A1. \\M. L�f \'LSlOfi EXHIBIT, G' S( -.XLL• - 167 r J` Y CM' OF RANCHO CL:C-XIIO.NGA PL.4\ \I.NG cxvEM P 1 ]S V N(>itTl I' ffE%6 s37394? TITI.F., 429Y /Mr g 6vy�rya EXHIBIT a' SCALE Y RESOLUTION NO. 68 -167 A RESOLUTION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A RESIDFNTIAL 5 TWEEN SUMMIT AND HIGH',.AID AVENUES - AM 225- , 37, 38, 49, 53, 55, 61 AND 225 - 171 -01, 09, A. Recitals. kk' (i) Pulsar UevelopAent has filed an application for the approval Yi of Tentative Tract Map No. 13812 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as 'the application'. (ii) On the 24Th of August, 1988, the Planning Commission of r,a City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Comaission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comsission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Coamission during the above - referenced public hearing on August 24, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testiaavy, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located west of Etiwanda Avenue, between Suasnit and Hignland Avenues, with street frontages of 1,646 feet along Summit Avenue and 659 feet along Highland Avenue and a depth of 2,648 feet. The property 1s presently developed with a single family residence; and (b) The property to the north and east is vacant and is designated for residential uses. The property to the south 1s vacant and is designated for the future Foothill /59 a I iu P.MUIfIOR NO. 88_167 2 '• Freeway. The property to the west is vacant and developed } with single family residences and is designated for residential uses; and (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all uinimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and s (d) The development of 110 single family lots on the western 31.47 acres of the site is consistent with the Low Residential land use designation of the General Plan; and (e) The development of 44 single family lots on the eastern 27.86 acres of the site is consistent with the Very Low Residential land use designation of the General Plan; and (f) The proposal, with the recommended Conditions of is in compliance with the Raster Plan of Trails aandvthe objectives of the Equestrian Overlay District. 3. Based during the above- referent de publics hearing iand cupon the pecifictsfindings iof t facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and Specific Plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and Specific Plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the•subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commigsion hereby finds and certifiess tthhat the Groject has been reviewed and considered n comp) ante with the Ca 7I Pat Environmenttsa Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Coewissien hereby lssuos a Regattve Deciaratton. r / � v __ �r PLANNING COMIISSIO" RESOLUTION NO. 88 -167 TENTATIVE TRACT 1 .2 August 24, 1988 Page 3 1, 2 and 3 above, thisnCommissionfindings ereby approves the applicationnsubjectato each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. A. Tentative Tract 1. Undergrounding of Existing Overhead Utilities A. The existing overhead utilities ( telecoaunications and electrical) on the project side of Highland Avenue shall be underg. -unded from the first pole off -site east of the east project boundary tc the first pole off -site west of the west project boundary. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of Highland Avenue. 8. An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) along the west project boundary shall be paid to the City prior to recordation of the Final Hap. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the southwest corner of lot 145 to the northwest corner of lot 123 (665 + feet). C. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and be�removed)fromtlot 76 to house an shall 1po 7Installation of underground utilities on -site to serve 2. Sucmmit Avenue shall be constructed full width, excluding off - site parkway improvements, from the intersection with W Street ersterly to the intermtion with Ettwanda Avenue, with Phase I development. The developer may request reimbursement agreements to recover the costs of off -site improvements from future development. 3. Two means of access shall be provided to each phase of the development. Both shall be public streets constructed full width curb -to -curb. 4. Perimeter streets which are located on -site shall be constructed full width curb -to -curb. Parkway improvements fronting 'not a part properties may be deferred until development of those properties. The affected streets include portions of 'L', 'G', and "Co Streets (opposite lots 111 -114). S. In -lieu fees for tW future construction of frontage streets which are not currently needed shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the Final Nap as follows: A, / PLANNING COMNISSIr" RESOLUTION 110. 88 -167 TENTATIVE TRACT 1. .2 August 24, 1998 Page 4 a) The south one -half of Suit Avenue west of 'N' Street to the centerline of the Southern California Edison right -of• way, including landscaping around the Cucamonga County Water District pump station; and b) The north one -half of 'C' Street west of the west project boundary to the centerline of the Southern California Edison right -of -way. 6. Temporary access across the future Route 30 Freeway right -of -way will be allowed as follows: a) 'L' Street between 'E' Street and Highland Avenue shall be constructed 28 feet wide with concrete curbs only (no gutters). The curb returns at 'E' Street shall have 15 foot radii. There shall be no sidewalk south of 'E' Street; and b) The intersection of 'L' Street and Highland Avenue shall be upgraded to provide right and left turn lanes for Loth the north and south movements. Transition tapers on Highland Avenue shall be designed for a 55 mph design speed. The pavement disturbing rbingthe e turning shall xist ngicprovementson ®the south s1 a of INghland Avenue; and c) A fee for the future ramoval of the temporary access road and the transition tapers on Highland Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the Final Map. 7. The portion of the site west of 'H' and 'L' Streets 1s subject to flooding from flay Creek Channel. Therefore, final plans will not be accepted for review and no permits (improvements, building, grading, etc.) will be issued until Phase II of the Day Creek Channel is sufficiently completed to provide necessary flood protection as approved by the City Engineer. 8. Interim drainage protection facilities shall be provided along the north project boundary. The design shall be justified by drainage Aareementushalldbepexecutedyto the the isay tisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing private maintenance of the drainage protection facility but providing the City with the right of access to maintain 0e facility if private maintenance is insufficient, and allowing the City to assess those costs to the developer. 9. The main storm drain line within 'N' and 'L' Streets shall be sized for a QI00. The pipe shall be extended southerly and westerly within a street or Dublic easement to tho existing inlet on the north side of Highland Avenue. M ■ 88.167 14, The easement for ingress and egress and maintenance of public utilities along the western portion of the site shall be quit claimed prior to approval of the Final Map, 15, Local equestrain trail easements shall be provided on -the Final Map as follows: A. The trail easement arid property line between lots 9,17 and 18 shall be shifted to the west to line up with the northwest corner of -C" and -0" streets. b. A 15 foot wide trail an the south side of lots 19, 20 and 23. C. A 15 foot wide trail on the south side of lot 13, d. A 15 foot wide trail on the west side of lot 1. This trial,,' shall be shifted to the west tract boundary upon removal "of the access road to Highland Avenue, f e, A 15 foot wide trail along the south tract boundary. :: ,„ August 24, 1988 < _ X axe}- Page 5 Ir ti y �i 10. The Eesfgn of storm drainage facilities for the rtion of -ths, ' I ;W site east of "M" and "L" Streets shall be coordinated with the developer the ;.'• of adjacent property to the cast. Pipeline crossings of the future Route 30 Freeway, shall be held to :y ' minimum. a +, 11. Construct the portion of the City Master Plan Storm Drain located within Sumait Avenue as justified by the, final drainage study and approved by the City Engineer. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be creditod to the cost of the facility and the n developer shall be eligible fur-reimbursement of costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City Ordinance No. 75, i' 12. Written verification shall be obtained from Caltrans that sufficient freeway- right -of -way has been provided prior to 3• approval of the Final Map. _ y 13. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the J p:. required off -site property interests ntcessary to construct the ,: required street improvements for Summit'Avenue. If he should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the Final Nap for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to 0overnmient Code Section 66462 at such time as the city acquires the property Interests required for the improvements. Sucb agreement shall provide for bthe the all incurred the acquire offaslteoprope property rests ed in with the subdivision. Security for ' a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer at the developer's expense. The appraiser shall be approved by the City prior to commencement of the aopraisal_ 14, The easement for ingress and egress and maintenance of public utilities along the western portion of the site shall be quit claimed prior to approval of the Final Map, 15, Local equestrain trail easements shall be provided on -the Final Map as follows: A. The trail easement arid property line between lots 9,17 and 18 shall be shifted to the west to line up with the northwest corner of -C" and -0" streets. b. A 15 foot wide trail an the south side of lots 19, 20 and 23. C. A 15 foot wide trail on the south side of lot 13, d. A 15 foot wide trail on the west side of lot 1. This trial,,' shall be shifted to the west tract boundary upon removal "of the access road to Highland Avenue, f e, A 15 foot wide trail along the south tract boundary. :: ,„ Page 6 ria_'aa1 T ;112ESOLUTION NO. 88 -167 f. a 10 foot wide trail along the east tract boundary. 16. Heavy broom finish concrete crossing shall be provided where trails cross public streets. The crossing shall be shown on the street improvement plans and shall be approved by the City Engineer and City Planner prior to approval of the Final Hap, 17. The final Grading Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Grading Comlttee prior to approval of the Final Map. B. Design Review 1. A sound will, as required by the acoustical analysts, shall be installed along the south tract boundary. The final design of the wall shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. A final acoustical analysis shall be required to identify necessary mitigation measures to reduce the noise levels within the residences below 4S CNEL. The report shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. A decorative perimeter block wall shall be required around the western portion of the tract (Low Residential), along Summit Avenue, along `C' Street, and along all corner side yard areas. The design and location of the wall shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The Secretary to this Comaission shall certify to the adoption Of this Resolution. APPROVED AND AOCPTEO THIS 241H DAY OF AUGUST, 1988, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ae T �1 1 r 167 T E AIJ '4 Pa 1, Brad Buller, ,Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City Of R&400 Cucamonga, do hereby :certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduce 3; J,"'passed,- and adopted by the,Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of August. 1988,'by the following vote -to -wit: z AYES: COMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, CHMEA, BLAKESLEY, EKERICK, TOLSTOY HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: NONE \ E � � t � � h3 9 �■ !� \ -| ! - 7■ ! . � k� §! �k. E fill _ �\ k !� .d .& § ■.f . � . . }' � ri|�f � } | : PIS j / ! { i , v k ■ ) Val a£ | fill � ; i 514 q� }§�| � g|fA@. | | � /_,gl all | q q 6 6! � �- . . . / ! | ,. $ $| i| G G i i 2:1 q q| z zzl � � ! ! f / / q q, 2U ! §a at ! ! !\ A f � | | Wr \ TL %2�_w � a Mill� OUR �■ � � gr. � \ / : \P| s !�� | �■ � � gr. � \ / : \P| s !�� | I El W Es:a sa s a- Fa - iaassag•s saes r -Sli a9 - i -' 3aei•si -'ia ; ipi fill i! FIR !'b Y'as; I!FE a s 'Lea sg° a33 i? sA =gi7z: -?�•� ssas: a iea3 sy a Y3" Eca ;E -3a"H $? io; P =3 Is- .2%1 i�Si 1 a=a :..s8:aa-r3 11 aaa E t•+5 l �A 3 -a $' Al :a =3'Ha °= a� Fri' 3 _ Z •y3�e �„ :�� :gis$3 - °.ste is °s �f'a a 3 E .ss3 a '• g'a .: ::� °._ i ��8€ fill 3 ��? c "i� al3i .3- ass rim ,t =sijsj Egi S3F ize i °� a as drii 3i Y2 s9 ash =`3 aid- sF 11-j! ' a _ eS -:3 33 V4 3s3 33 a' s • 5s ! a a 3 a $- a� s ai ia�= a-s�5 "e aafa To I sYSa y =rss ? a3 13- g. asd� is sa3 e'S E�. 853 a�Fs a =�r e e -fis r8 a 3r•c'S -a i. r fi- €Y3e a - :s3 a- a� �s. =• aas s-€ 5a�a ,:s's E '< -•�`? :e? �� 'a cx�t: to� :3ii ai�3aEa rf } ;-.05 l p 1E VI �z bdJ /r� 3i #3 Nil ai sg�3 E- = S P= 8; ' jia SIE -3 y BA. a S -° isP- jk ^ =c = 3$ 5!1 .. -ij s "SF; - Ss s"gn -11; viii .Ep 3a3b Y sr,"a Yi1; r �� €�Y€ $ as iEYi ;�ti TL A-Z a ,e i 33or y 3 aa. D s�sa $s •es 9 .. s s gi- F a_ S gg i = E Yip aca 3s 3a I 3= Si- _sa -- a E� Sk F3o �9 -Cs i. ?I 3 s irs z iaa s;r� S giji Ese IE Fs aaY D 43 1 -fir E1 3s pssail r�' j i i;� E -,ya .1 Se ds- - 3 lsea 9 3 221 s� Al 9 �IIl =ik_e "� sa ip -sE s rE ;rs s=ib E- s ��i ga, i _a as SF rsc Kit aM,F s35r Ya sr�rs Al drr Fig r R V e a: �i st; 3 "rs; Ail a I 3 r =asr g at b $ 20 2sa2� a33 s a s g ? t ?saw 1 3 8{ Sa=ys Liy a '3 a s _s r dJ E s =r i�3 =�� a a s e s� P13E s 3, ca = � X33 "Ii si arcs 3ga3_s s 3:� 3 � a s a s wfi a3 s = -g� i3rs s= i s- �SF :st R, a ! "s a c e g y3 3 3p 3� l 3s�i H 32 br r 3;• r 53 3 +� s _ ra3! 333 ss3ya ss s =a E3 s s i a �`rs 3ias ri:3 -sr FS s $3 = ass? i; - iii ; +3I ssaai tsh- ; Psd ss I gas 3I saa 3 eLt i Ms Zil 74 21 71 -sJs V 3t "- sg 3 e g -i: 14.13 21 L a a s- sat r L l �s s ai3 s �9Ya 3 ss: a_ 3E 5� s- gfi Y _ s °3:t -5F RN ; _ .. s_:�s 3s=�n 3assi s3 -i ass' . ss a E = ?3�a � J 111 11. 1 ass a 111',7° :-if AJ a aS�S_ A ? I r V ryl ^I it J�I �•I �I •I � "I � 7a t� C �I V� ..... 8 tF� a r 3 tic ;$� f' $ g 3 FF a a3 4� a 'P �2 CS Y�Y •�' Y 'a :f far sf e i <22; It ev is 2l �- i s a 2 ; a f -� F '$ 1 F § § 1' F _ r dt tit Ap ja t I to Ai 93 en. `y3 ae= 8Fa$z F -� 3€ F 33 =; $4 s 3? S- :hh; e ga gr s" S V 11 !I ■ � tp ! \ � : | if I p 5| / if r2| . . #3.1 !!a! 'v % � I � � } , ! � \ ■ -| _ .a.) � 7! 5R■ rf� \! �!q |1 = t n - � �| !� 2 �§ � # . !/ /| I 2; air \ .§d! £■ § ` F. tp ! \ � : | if I p 5| / if r2| . . #3.1 !!a! 'v % � I � � } , ! � \ ■ -| _ .a.) � 7! 5R■ rf� \! �!q |1 = t \g ■ \!` �| ■/� � # . \- air \ § ` F. --./ / - ƒ ©� j 2 j 4221 /\0- \g ■ \!` �| ■/� � # . \- air \ § ` F. --./ / - # ©� j j j RESOLUTION nil. 88 -166 A RESOLUTION OF-THE "ANCHU CUCAHOiGA PLANNING C"ISSION APPROVING VARIANCE W. 88 -16 TD TO REDUCE THE MTHIMUM LOT DEPTH FHCM 100 FEET TO 94 FEET AND 95 FEET FOR TWO LOTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 154 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 71.33 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE j BETWEEN SUMMIT AND HIGHLAND AVENUES - APR: 225 - 161 -37, 36, 37,38, 49,53, 55, 61 AND 225 -171- 01. 09, 10, 17. ±' A. Recitals. 3+ (I) Pulsar Development has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No. 88 -16 as described in the title of this Resolution. x Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subJect Variance request is referred to at •�. "the application'. ' Rancho Cucaimonga�conducuted ab duly8 noticed public hearing ion the application k and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 2 B. Resolution. t NON, THEREFORE, It is hereby found, detemined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comatssion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and corrrt. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on August 24, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located west of Etlwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highland Avenues, with street frontages of 1,646 feet along Suns:it Avenue and 659 fact along Highland Avenue and for depth of 2,648 feet. The property is presently developed with a single family residence; and (b) The property to the north and east is vacant and is designated for residential uses. The property to the s ,)uth is rnt atod is designated for the future Foothill Freeway. The prmerty to the west is vacant and developed with single family residences and 1s designated for residential uses; and (c) The reduction in lot depth is necessary to realign "F" Street and preserve an existing structure. - ; 73 VARIANCE NO. 8 -It RESOLUr16N N0. AHCE N0, 8g_ Pgust 24, 1988 9 t 88 -166 durin 3. Based upon the substantial evidence facts set the above - referenced public hearin concludes forth in pare ra 9 and upPresented n to this Commission follows; g Dh 1 and 2 above specific flnddllngsof this C�alssfon hereby ifnds and (a) That ctrl (b) (c) (dl (e) inforcement of floe specified regulation InCe1pretaticn and hardship difficulty or 9 etlon wo,;ld r'�sant Development t Onsfstent with unnecessary physical Pwent Code. The oblectfvos of the That there VeInv exceptional conditions appjfe extraordfna ry Pr ro er ty olved or to ble trttItd ned u oo f th.0 not apply ralY e The s me district to other e That deprive strict othe literal iffedin�rPre�tion and rce�ent of owners of Otherpprope�tiesPr of I regulation d by}�e P e sane district. That the granting of the Variance With the a grant of of Privilege the limitations on other will not in the soak district. ProDerttfesnclassified That the granttnge f the Variance will not by detrimental to welfare, or materiall public health improvements in the vlcintNtyurfous to ,DroPor ' or 1, 2 and 3 BaslspOn The findings acd conclusions e a Paragraph above OMIssion hereby e PProved set fora in para rap of "' S' The Secretor ADtfeati ,n, s Rnsciution. y to this Comaisslon shall certif Y to the adoption APPROVED AM ADOPTED PLANNING Ci W?Ccreo .,_ _ _ By ATTI THIS 24TH OAV OF AUGUST, 1988. / 7sz A _ � .r•r l YV J d ]'. �.4'�.�= 'rY- z�.'3:K i;'l�*l �e ''Y: ".', °t`,..s ".h J`y:• � }_•��.t•6 -.;�� PLANIIING,CdMISSE� Od'�ESOLUTIOB . N0. 88_166 V10HW'r_w i ee � + -- 24,c I, Brad Buller, Sacretaryof the Planning C010aission of the City of Rancho Cucamngg1, do hereby __ - Certify that the foregoing Resolution was' July, and ^e9ularly- Introduced , passed, and adopted, by the Planning CoMsslon of the C1ty of Rancho Cucaapnga, at a regular areting of aa the Planning Comfssion held on the 24th day,of August, 1988, by the frllowing vote.to -w:t: AYES: COMISS20NERS: NCNIEL, BLAKESLEY, CNITIEA, ENERICK, TOLSTOY NOES: COMIISSIOYERS: NONE ABSENT: COMIISSIONERS: NONE 7.S i i Y1 ? a' CITY OF R"CHO CUCAbtOA'CA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROA: Russell H. Maqulre, City Engineer BY: Joe SLfa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I future undergroundfng of ex Avenue and Amethyst Avenue 1 into 19 single family lots dwelling units per acre), Amethyst Avenue and Hflhland lieu fees for along Hellman acres of land 0istrict (2 -4 ntersectlon of I. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the Planning Comfssion's decision and deny the appeal request by adopting the attached Resolution. 11. BACKGROUND: The project consists of a subdivision of 6.87 acres into 19 single family lots (Exhibit 'B') and it was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on July 8, 1987. The Conditions of Approval require the payment of one -half in -lieu fees as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities on the opposite side of both Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Avenue from the centerline of the Metropolitan Water District (M.W.D.) right -of- way to the centerline of the future Route 3C Freeway right- of -►ay as shown on page 3 of Exhibit 'C'. At the August 10, 1988 Planning Commission meeting the Developer equested a modification of the Conditions, to reduce the amount of the 1n -lieu fees. He requested that the distances used to calculate the in- lieu fees be reduced as follows (Exhibit `00): 1. Amethyst Avenue - From the centerline of the N.W.D. right -of -way to the property line of the existing re sidence and then from the south property line of the existing residence to the south tract boundary, thus removing the existing house frontage and the Freeway right- of -wAy, and C, �' r t TENTAfIYE TRACT 13367 October 5, 1988 Page 2 2. Hellman Avenue - From the north tract boundary to the south tract boundary, removing the M.W.O. and Freeway rights -of -way. This request for modifications of the conditions of approval was dent,d by the Commission III. ANALYSIS• The developer contends that due to the unique and restrictive configuration and location of the grope ty (being bordered on the north by M.W.D. and on the south by State Highway rights -of -way) special consideration should be given to the distances used in calculating in- lieu undergroundlr.; fees. The decision of the Pla Commission Resolution No that in -lieu fees shall developed from property pproperties, to the center by the M at the end o references to streets she of -way, etc.', which has of -way such as the M.W.D. ig Comission was based on Paragraph 5a of 7 -96 (Exhibit 'E•). This paragraph states based upon the length of the property being to property line or, in the case of corner adjacent streets. The footnote referenced ie first line of Section 1 states that 'All ilso mean alleys, railroad or channel rights- " interpreted to include all public rights - I Freeway rights -of -way. The Planning Commission has made similar requirements for projects at the northeast corner of Etivanda Avenue and Highland Avenue and the southwest corner of Carnellan Street and Highland Avenue. The latter was appealed to and denied by the City Council. The future cost of undergrounding the overhead utilities within the Foothill Freeway corridor will be the responsibility of the City. Therefor+ whatever 1n -lieu fees are paid through development will lessen the b,irden to the City in the future. The undergrounding in -lieu fee for this project 1s approximately $64,368, which amounts to approximately $9,369 per acre, or $3,576 per unit. This cost is not considered excessive. The Highland Avenue and Carnelian Street project had a cost of $13,186 per acre, or $3.922 per unit while the Highland Avenue and Etlwanda Avenue project had a cost of $13,422 per acre, or $9.235 per unit. Other residential projects have been required to incur costs as high as $44,000 per acre ($5,000 per unit) with $20,000 per acre not unusual. Additionally, the Developer states that none of the adjacent developments have paid any fees for future undergrounding of overhead utilities. However, it should be noted that the adjacent projects were approved prior to the adoption of the current undergrounding policy. l 7/7 3 a M fTl J „r Iv. CONCLUSION: The length of the,sdodivision property proposed for use in calculating the, undergrounding-`fee; requirement for this project is consistent' with ' current pol icy ?And'is' not. considered''excessive -when compared ta;otherj. Projects within,the City:',;Therefore;rthe requirement for payment of the in -lieu fees; as'conditioned`by the,Pisnning Commission, is appropriate and reasonable, and the.decisiion of the Planning Commission should be upheld, and the appeal denied.. Res y ltted, f G Rus3ei+. quire City Engineer RH4:JS:Jxb Attachments: Vicinity Nap (Exhibit 'A') Site Hap (Exhibit '8') P.L. Resolution No. 87 -107 (Exhibit 'C') Developer's Nodification Letter to P.C. (Exhibit 'D') P.C. Resolution No. 87 -96 (Exhibit 'E') Developer's Appeal Letter Resolution 1 l 79� I a CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA pm; TT 133 `? N T1TL8: VIC.INIT`/ MAP l 75' i A+/6NL.I1VO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAh:ONGA .4vwm6w E mL. TT 13341 N ml&. 51TE MAP MMMi. urn _ 6 r� RESOLUTION N0. 87 -107 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCM ONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROvINC TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 13367 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Nap No. 13367, hereinafter •Ma P' subettted the Property situated In fn Co.. applicant. gf'Rafnq�o Cuca Purpose of subdividing the real Subdivisionaloeeb , a7 acres o� land I" the Law Residential District ctLtly dwllingg units per acre) located vest of the intersection of Methyst Street and N19hland Avenue - AM 201- 711 -01, 02, 03 into 19 lots, regularly cave before the Planning Co�fasion for public heating and action ONN Nay 13, 1987; and to all Conditions set foPrtjN ""j� has En � 9pa and planning P subject repots; and 9 Division s Engineering! nPlanningPOlvfsl un's�sKdandahisrConsidered othereevvidencce pro sented at the public hearing. Now. THEREFORE, the Planning Com'sslon of the City of Rancho Cucaewnga does resolve as follows; regard toSEsnTaN ve Tract No.n13667Candthe mjap thgrbt following findings in (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, DevelOPNI t Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or leproverents of the tentative tract 1s consistent with the General Plan, Developmnt Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of develoPMnt Proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial envfrOmIntal dMage and avoidable injury to hueyns and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to Cause Public health problas; serious (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easesent acquired by the public at large, Property within therpropo proposed through of the O� TT 13367 r O U:vuNnNr "n "(1 ,�: Y PLANNING CgctSSI( IESOLUTION NO. g Tentative Tract Ib.o7 - Pennhill Development July 8, 1987 r Page 2 (g) That this protect will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative De laration is issued, hereto, SECTION subject to a} attached do the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: I. Applicant shall submit an acoustical study prior to issuance of .> building permits, which indicates mitigation me asures to achieve interior 45 CNEL mexf a . Construction plans shall conform to the recommendations of said report, 2. Material samples shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Landscaping and irrigation, including street tress, shrubs and ground vo required. Detail landscaping be submitted the City r approval prior plan oissuance o j building permits. 4. An eight and six foot masonry block will with decorative cap shell be provided along south and east property lines, respectively. S. Architectural treatment shall be provided to all corner units and units subject tw public views. 6. Six foot high decorative masonry return wall shall be provided along the southside of Lot 17 and northside of Lot 19. 7. Six foot high decorative masonry perimeter wall shall be provided along the entire north property line. B. Floor plan 6120 is to be used on Lot 2 with modifications for a side -on garage with access off of Highland Avenue shall be reviewed and approved by the City planner prior to issuance of building permits. 9. Floor plan /110 shall be used on Lot 4. 10. Proposed 2 to I slopes along the east side of Lot 19 shall be filled in and 4' of wrought iron fefiCing Ilia provided at the top of wall. 11. The 6' wide parkway along the southside of Highland shall be provided with drought tolerant varieties of trees, shrubs of various sizes, ground cover, and rockscepe. The landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. / $I')- PLANNING COMMISSIC ESOLUTION N0. Tentative Tract 13awi - pannhfll Development July 8, 1987 Page 3 12. A specicl landscape treatment shall o¢ )rovided at the project entrance off Amethyst. The landscape Mans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. All wells within the project shall be coordinated for consistency. The walls shall be shown on the final landscape Plan which is subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. I. Hellman Avenue - An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities itelecoa•unlcations) on the 0pPosfte side of Hallman Avenue shall be paid to the City prier to recordation of the final map. The fee shall be one -nalf the City adopted unit amount times the length from the centerline of M1D right -of -way to the centerline of the future State Highway Route 30 right -of -ray. 2. Amethyst Avenue - An in -llee fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities MItcommunicatfons and elactrical) on the opposite side of of the fina�n maphalTheefeeishall the ones- halfothe Clitjoadopted of- rayuto theicenterlfnenof he future eStatelHighway Route 30 rlaht.ef.wav_ 3. The existing overhead utility service to Lot 19 shall be undergrounded in accordance with the utility standards, prior to occupancy of the first house within the tract. 4. The developer shall coordinate the design and construction of Amethyst Avenue with the Cfty's Capital Improvement Project located between 19th Street and Hfghlard Avenue to the satisf ction of the City Engineer. 5. Notice of intention to form and /or join the Lighting and re amp to District shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 6. The driveway for Lot 19 shall be relocated to take access from "Aa Street or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 7. An easement and permits shall be obtained from the Metropolitan Water District for any work within their right -ef -ray prior to recordation of the final map. 8. The plans for all work along the tract's southern boundary shall be submitted to Cal Trans for review and approval prior to recordation of the final map. 193 PLANNING COIMISSIO. PSOLUTION N0. Tentative Tract 13367 - Pennhill Oevelapeent July 8, 1987 Pays APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1987. Y PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s BY: ie�'e-1 i d rY T. is 2 to Brad Buller, 1)"Uty: Setrotary. of the Planning Commission of the City of w Rancho Cuceeonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and S' regularly introduced,' Passed; and adopted by the Planning Caerlsalon of the z; ontthef8q Rancho Cutaeenye. at a regular meeting of the Planning COMMisfion held day of July. 1947.8 thi following vote -to =wit: r AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, ENERICK, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, 1:CNIEL HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABET: COMMISSIONERS: NONE July S. 1988 City of Rancho Cucamonga P 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Attn: Engineering / Planning Dept Be: Tentative Tract 13387 This letter is to request of tentative tract number 13367. reference to the underarounding Hellman Avenues. a modification to the conditions The modification requested Is in of utilities along Amethyst and I feel that due to the unique and restrictive configuration of the property, (being s long and narrow piece of property stretching from Amethyst to Hellh;an and being bordered by both the proposed route 30 freeway on the south and the Metropolitan Water District pipeline on the north) This property should bear special consideration. In your prior conditions on the approval at the Tentative Tract Hay the distance on which any undergrounding would be calculated on would be, on Amethyst, from the centerline of the M W.D right -of -way to the centerline of the future State Highway Route 30 right- of -waY." a total of 432 feet, at the present rate of 3106.50 /Der foot for electrical and telecommunications ($46,008 00). Hellman Avenue. "from the centerline of the H W D. right of way to the centerline of the future State Highway Route 30 right -of -way." a total of 432 feet, at the present rate of 85 00 /Der foot for telecommunications (518.380 00) For a total coat of 584.388.00 or 43576 09 par lot to be developed. I feel that on thin particular parcel of property your guidelines are overly burdensome and eignificantl•, affect the economic feasibility of the pro.lect, as well Ae clueing the property Owner an undue hardship in that his property value is adversely Affected Understanding that the City needs to fund such projeeto through a fee system. but also believing that the only criteria f•)r collecting such fees from a property owner should not be the City s Inability to collect from otter entities (pub)ic or private) I would propose to pay our appropriate share of the coat Our calculations would be: nn Amethyst Avenue, from the centerline of the M W D rteht- of -vav (due to highland extension) to the property line of the existing residence (50') and then from the south property line of the existing residence O S TT 133167 7mirutepen r to the south Tract boundary (182-or 919,383.001 On Hellman Avenue, from the north tract boundary to the south tract boundary (232• or $9.280.00) For a total of $28.843.00 or $1.591.28 per unit 9eing that ve vill be undargrounding the utilities to the existing residence instead of an in- lieu -of fee I feel that this uould be a more acceptable manner to fairly assess these fee* Los the future Ondergreunding of the utility lines se they are allocated to a apecitic property. Please note the attached exhibits in making you decision as they vill illustrate what I feel is a burdensome situation as it relates to the proposed development. Thank you for your consideration of this matter and I hope you can understand by concern regarding these tees. Sincerely. quinteasenco Development Company 1 ose d inn e f. 1 - YYY�� EXHID�T D'(1.OF4� Ail •F' MAN D am " m rn d K N N N r u .'b0 x� .;1 w � 4p .cy' � `oJ Q0`7 i d� Q0.G0�� - -_ i LYl —ll I I N ? Temtc}iut TQa�} 13347 r r r P 2 a c Z F P m,w o. CMW 0) A Hi6hlaroo nueruLLe i i n PROPoseo Room 3o FRan way TeN'tC6MU4- 'Rac4t \3347 ir8 E1lN I (%IT * W; RESOLUTION No. 87 -96 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING c"ISSION CF THE CITT OF Ot THE INNOERGIt UI0 M A OF EXISTiNG A O VERREHVEIAS VERHEAD UTILITIES AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 66 -77 wishes t repeal Resolution iNo. C86- 77swhich Of Rancho n the 28tCucamonga a May, 19M and establish the revised policy Contained herein; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility items in ardor to pr a more aesthetic and desirable working and li omote and ving environment within the City; WHEREAS, It is rvneessary to establish A polic owners and dev2loptrs of the City goal. y to inform property except these,Contnee THEREFORE, Section 7 and any others spedcitically developments by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergroundfng all existing overhead utility Imes including the removal of the related supoerttng poles adjacent to and within the hafts of A development as follows: 1. Lines on the uw oject side of the street*. a. Said lines shall be undergro:nded at the developers expense. b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergreunding is impractical At present for such reasons as a short iength of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not undarrounded adj acent), a heavy concentration of services to other disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Dev users, eloper shall pay an in -lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. e. The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost Of undergroundfng from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of the street. 2. Lines on the a site side of the street from the o act: The Developer z a pay a o e y or one - a amours per action 6. 3. Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with so that M bears a total e� 3��reiar reimbursement or coy additional fees under xpkrse equivalent t0 one -half the total cost of grounding the lines on both sides of the street. 4. Pole lines centalnin 66KV or lar electrical lines: All lines shall be un vag•oun a or n- eu ees pa n actor ante w section 1, 2 or 3, above, except for 66 K,—,—re V or larger electrical lines. TT 13367 Ctiuunir`'er" .y r: e i 5. Lfalts of Ilesoonsibilfties• F V a. In-law feel 'shall be based upon the length',of the property baing streets forrcoorner properties). 11ne to property line (the teeter of adjacent i 1w'oprttes). b. ft all shall include the entire project frontage and extond (a (i) the ftrst existing pole otf -s) te from the project boundaries ( + cross the street for carne• ProPmrttes), (2) a new pole arecttl at A ex S In bound+rY (across the street for corner properties), or (3) an existing poll within 5 feat of A Project boundary, except at a corner. 6. Fee Amount: The amount for fn.lieu fees shall equal the length (per K an .a Yie" the unit amount As established b the city Council bued upon Information supplied by the utility cupa Periodically as deemed aassary. ntes and is updated 7. Ixs_ptions.. The following types of projects shall be exempt from this Po c�i-y; a. The : loading docks, functional as: equipment to existing anlopeaets, such parking ands, cooling Losers, enclosure of an outdoes• water toranks, ear parking and loading areas, block walls and fences, etc. area, b. Building additions or new fret standing9 buildings of less than 25% of the floor arms of the existing bull ding(s) on the scree assessor's parcel, or 5,000 square feet, whichever is less. C. Exterior upgrading or repair of existing developments, such as: sccreening, repaint g and exrtlrior, finlshas, etcandscaptng. equipment d. Interior tenant feprovemants and non - construction CUPS. e. The construction of a single family residence on an existing parcel. f. Existing overhead utility lines located in trails, alien, and utility easeaentt with a heavy wncentration of services to adjacent developments, and the utility lanes are SM, or more from the right of way lane of a Speoial 80ulavrd. 9• Residential subdivision, of four or fewer single family residential Parcels, where the utility lines extend at least 600, offsite from both the project boundaries and the adjacent Property as not likely to contribute to future undargrounding. All references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad or channal rights -0 -way, etc. /176 Ev1a1R,4Ma lftA W% :4f�'S `�� ":� wr��. _- �v'AfK. h yam`- v - ._ Sa,��.L�,- ',,,°y V>., "*.: .%:�j ��^'•' jv`= APPROYN>7 AND ADOF,TEO, TNIS 10th DkY OF JUNE 1907. PUNe10N" Cpl ISSIOM OF TN[ CITY OF IYINCINO OCAIMM BY: e: y aMOR p: I. Brad Butler, Deputy YWatary of the Plane! of t1w Rancho Cucam,19a, do harety certify that the f@"Jo1n9 Retolutt rae duty and ragt+lm ly Nntroduced, passed. rd a City of Rancho Cucaeon9a: at a ra9ulet1 g,� the Caillsf iNld <r rw the 10 day of Juno, 15"7. by the follortn9 vot4ko -wit: ' AYES: COMMSSIONERS: EMICK, CRITIU. ICRIEL S• ROES: CNISSIONERS: TOMOY ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: Neill ASSTAItC Cp9NISSIONERS: BUKESLEY �j M 11 rl�.® August 19, 1988 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.C. Box g Bo7 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Attn: Community Development Department Planning Division Re: Tract 13367 Ms. Eelly orta: I as in receipt of your letter dated August 15, 1988 wherein I was informed that the planning commission denied our request for a modification to the traot map as it relates to 9ndersrounding utilities. I have discussed the denial with the property owner and he has requested that we appeal this decision to the City Council. It is our contention that this property owns: is treated unfairly by the restrictive interpretation of the guidelines as they are written and does not give adequate consideration for the unique and restrictive configuration of the property. Additionally we have been informed that none of the adJacent developments have paid these fees and feel that with this in mind our case should be reevaluated. Thank TOO for your time and cooperation. J e xm rum snort uuwotcvyoee. awt nsan•uu CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � , 11 : 1"T 133&"1 WM APPEAL LE-"EP— err l9�- RESOLUTION NO. 08 -505 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA APPROVING A REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13367, TO PERMIT DEVELOPMENT OF A 19 -LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ON 6.87 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND LOCATED WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF AMETHYST AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE - APN 201- 711 -01, 02, 03. A. RECITALS (t) Quintessence Development Company has filed an application for approval of Tentative Tract 13367 described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereafter, in this Resolution the subject Tentative Tract request 1s referred to as 'ths Tentative Tracts. (11) On July 8, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the Tentative Tract and following the conclusion of said hearing, adopted their Resolution No. 81 -107 thereby approving the Tentative Tract. (iII) On August 10, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by the Developer to modify the conditions contained in said Resolution No. 87- 107, and following the conclusion of said hearing, adopted their Resolution No. 88 -155 thereby denying the requested modifications. (iv) The applicant has filed a timely appeal of the denied modification request represented in said Resolution No. 88 -155 on the basis of two (2) Conditions contained in said Resolution No. 87 -107. The Cenditicns appealed are described as follows: a. The requirement to pay an 1n -lieu fee for the future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along Hellman Avenue (Condition No. 1 - Engineering Division). b. The requlre=nt to pay an in -lieu fee for the future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along Amethyst Avenue (Condition No. 2 - Engineering DlvisIon). (v) On October 5, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the appeal of the Tentative Tract and, on said date, concluded the public hearing. (vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION NON, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: - /53 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -505 TENTATIVE TRACT 13367 October 5, 1988 Page 2 1. This Courv:11 hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered to compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and concurs with the issuance of the mitigated negative Declaration issued on July 8, 1987. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced October 5, 1688 hearing, including written staff reports, the minutes of the above - referenced July 8, 1987 and August 10, 1988, Planning Commission meetings and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 87 -107 and 88 -155 this Council specifically finds as follows: a. The Tentative Tract applies to property located west of the intersection of Amethyst Avenue ar.d Highland Avenue within the Low Residential District (2-4 (oielling units per acre); b. The property to the north, east and west of the subject site is within the Low Residential Development District and is currently developed with slogle family homes and the. Groperty to the south 1s within the Medium Residential Development District and is currently developed with an apartment complex; c. The Tentative Tract contemplates the developmort of a 19 -lot subdivision on 4.87 acres of land; d. The requirements of Planning Commission Resolution No. 87- 107 (Conditions No. 1 and 2- Engfnering Division) that the Developer pay an in -lieu fee for the future uneerarounding of tie existing overhead utilities remain an important and necessary condition; and e. The Development as specified wi'.1 not contradict the goals or objectives of the General Plan or Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and would not promote a detrimental condition to the persons or properties in the iamed!ate vicinity of the subject site. 4. Based on the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract 1s consistent with the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; c. The subject site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; //v 6. The Council hereby provides notice to Quintessence Development Company that the time within which judicitil review of the decision represented by the Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Prccedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and W forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to Quintessence Development Company at their address as per City records. RESOLUTION MD; - TENTATIVEJAACT 13367' - October S.'- 1968' T Page 3 d. The design -of -Aha proposed develojee4it;,is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or avoidable Injury to Wisisor-wildlife or their habitat; e. The development is not likely to cause serious health problems; and f. The design ,of the develort will not conflict. with', any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record-for access through or use of the property within the proposed_ eieveopment., 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above. this Council hereby approves the Tentative Tract subject to all of the Conditions set forth in Planning Cormisslon Resolution Mos. 87- 107 and 88-255 (copies of which are attached hereto and marked as Exhibits *16 and 811 • respectively). 6. The Council hereby provides notice to Quintessence Development Company that the time within which judicitil review of the decision represented by the Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Prccedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and W forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to Quintessence Development Company at their address as per City records. RESOLUTION No. 87 -107 A RESOLUTION RANCHO CUCIlIDNGA,, CALIFORNIA, ING CCOONDITIONALLY APPROVI11O TENTATIVE TRACT HAP Iq, 13.167 by WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Rep No. 13367, hereinafter 'Map• submitted Property Pennhill Land in the applicant, ty of Rancho Cucamonga. of,sub•f San the real State of California, described as a development Coa 19'l San Bernardino, subdivision on 6.87 arras of land in the Low Raside tfalt D strict em(2 -a Mlling units per acre) iocated crest of the intersection of Amethyst Street and Highland Avenue - AFN: 201- 711 -01, 02, 03 into 19 lots, regularly case before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on Nay 13, 1987; and to all ond�itlonttht tit City planner has En�ereidngindva of the Map vsubject reports; and Considered the Engineering EaEnd Division'soreposrts andahis considered Other evidence Presented at the public hearing. NOW, resolve as fol, THEREFORE, Cucamonga the lows Planning : Cosission of the City of Rancho SECTION 1: The Planning Commission sakes the following findings in regard to en ve Tract No. 13667 and the Nap thereof: (a) The tentative tract it consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and spxiffc plans; (c) The_ site is physically suitable for the type of oeveloparnt proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the Property within the proposed subdivision, 19/ T4' 833907 "'IM'. COMMSSSIi iESOLUTIOM N0. evelopment Tentative Trait lb+ 7 - pennhiii D i July B, 1987 Page 2 (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts an the environment and a xegatfva Declaration is issued. SECTIOA 2: TenUtive Tract Map go. 13367 a copy of metth is attacheG atpchid Standard Conditions: tioons subject to all of the following conditions and the 2 Pliant" 1. AppllcAnt shall submit an acoustical study prior to lssua;Ke of Interior permits, meth indicates mit/Qat M measures to Achieve the recommendations id �n e"On plans shall conform to 2. Material savples shall be submitted to the City Planner for apPreval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Landscaping and irrigation, including street trees, shrubs and Is suWtted cover, City u Planner for approval prlo:. to issuance of building permits. 4. M eiiht and six it ` masonry block wail with decorative cap Shall be Provided along pettivel south and east property lines, Sha S. And urhinitectural treatment shall be provided to all corner units ats subject to public views. 6• Six foot high decorative masonry return oil shelf be provided along the southside of Lot 17 and northside of Lot 19. 7• Six foot high decorative masonry psrimater provided along the entire north property line. veil shall be 8. lour plan #120 is to be used on Lot 2 with rsodificattons for a std! -rn garage with access off of Highland Avarua shall De reviewed and approved by the City fanner prior to issuance of building permits. 9. r'loor Plan 0110 shall be used on Lot 4. 10. pro osed 2 to slopes along he east side of Lot 19 shall be off wall. ln' and 4' of wrought iron fencing be Provided at the top 11. The 6' wide parkway along the southside at Highland shall be provided with drought tolerant varieties of trees, shrubs of various sizes, ground cover, and rxkscappe. The landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City planner prior to the tssuane =ef tiullding permits. /G� EXHi T'!rTLDF4, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Tentative Tract 13367 - Pennhill Development July 8, 1987 Page 3 12. A special landscape treatment shall be provided at the project entrance off Amethyst. The landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. All wails within the project shall be coordinated for consistency. The wails shall be shown on the final landscape plan which is subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. Engineering Division: 1. Hellman Avenue - An fn -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecosminicetfons) on the oppposite side of Hellman Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to recordation of the final map. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amunt times the length from the centerline of MWO right -of -way to the centerline of the future State Highway Route 30 right -of -way. 2. Amethyst Avenue - An fn -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergroundfng of the existing overhead utilities (teleco=unfcations and electrical) on the opposite side of Amethyst Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to recordation of the final map. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the centerline of MNO right. of-way to the centerline of the future State Highway Route 30 right -of -ray. 3. The existing overhead utility service to Lot 19 shall be undergro,inded in accordance with the utility standards, prior to occupancy of the first house riithin the tract. 4. The developer shall coordinate the design and construction of Amethyst Avenue with the City's Capital Improvement Project located between 19th Street and Highland Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. S. Notice of intention to form and /or join the Lightfng and Landscaping District shall be filed witli the City Council prior to recordation of the map or issuance of building permits. whichever occurs first. 6 The driveway for Lot 19 shall be relocated to take access from 'A' Street or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 7. M easement and permits shall be obtained from the Metropolitan Water District for any work within their right -of -way prior to recordation of the final map. 8. The plans for alll work along the recordation of the final map. f � 0- tract's southern boundary shall review and approval prior to LXWIfl1T = (M:4', PLANNING -COMMI Tentative Trac July 8._1987_' Development Page 4 ,v APM- Yo-.k!G 'ADORCI THIS STN DAY OF JULY. 1981. MANINO CWSSIOC OF Tk -'CITY OF r.A00 CUCAMONGA _tµ Is Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the plonntn7.CoWssion or the City of Rancho Cucaaonga; do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Kos duly and regularly tntroducld, passed, and adopttd' by the planning Cowtssion of the C1ty of Rancho Cuea�onga, at a reguler meeting of the planning Cemotssfon held on the 8th day of July, 1987, by the folleMeg rote- to -xtt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, EHERICK, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCHIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HONE F /99 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -155 - J A RESOLUTION 00 THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CA ONDITI� OWN OF APPROVAL FOR REQUEST TENTATIVE MODIFICATION NNO. 13367, LOCATED WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF-AMETHYST AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APH: 201411 -01, 02, 03 A. Rec ",lr.- ` (i) On July 8, 1987, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 87 -107 thereby approving, subject to specified conditions, Tentative Tract 1336f, which provides for tha development of 19 single family lots on 6.87 acres of land within the Low Residential District. (ii) On July 6, 1988, a request was -filed by Quintessence Development Company to modify the condition of approval requiringg the payment of in -lieu fees for the future undergrounding of overhead utilities along Amethyst Avenue and Hellam Avenue. (iii) (4n the loth of August, 1988, the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that data. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and - esolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on August 10, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, -this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The requirement to pay in -lieu fees for future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Avenue is consistent with current Planning Commission Policy. TT 13Eb7 DOCK ExHI ®iT �.UTIOIINO.`w.g8 =155' �' •`.�' CE AZIYE TRACT,1 ?367 3., Based upon the substantial evfderce presented to this Commisiion during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of cants set forty to paragraph concludes as follows: 1 and 2 :hove, this Ccalssion hereby finds and (Q) 'fiat the requirement m s future underrggrounding of Pay utilities along Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Avenue Is reasonable. y 4. Based upon 1, 2 and 3 above, this the Commissions hereby ndenies n the trequested condition modification and reaflraGs Resolution No. 87 -107. S. The Secretary to this Co®ission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF AMUST, 1988. PLANNING CONyISSION Cr THEJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII BY: 1. Brad Buller, Secretary of the PlannM2 CO=f$Sion of the City of Rarcho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly lntrnduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular smeting of tha Planning Commission held en the 10th day of August, 1988, by the following rote -to -wit: AYES: C"ISSIGHERS: CHITICA, BLAKESLEY, MC NIEL, EMERICX NOES. COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY TT 133161 c7l]� 61t?41®Pt XL — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOATOA STAFF REPORT FOate: October 5, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: James T. Harris, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Cost - Comparison Report for Consideration of a Revised Traffic signal Illuminated Street Name Sign Face Design RX7MOUD/AMALYSIS• At the request of City Council at the meeting of September 21. 1988 tht costs for varius Illuminated Street Name Signs ware determined. These costs vary with the number of signs ordered due to set up costs for items not normally Placed on a sign such as logo decals and City name lattering. There 1s also a markup of from 8 to 10 percent by distritutors as the manufacturer cannot sell new signs directly to a contractor or the City. This markup has tieen included in the following costs. New 8 foot long signs with two panels each with a logo decal and block number designed for heavy wind loading are $820 each if 20 are purchased as a group or $682 if 100 are purchased together. This would be Option D as shown in the previous staff report. Option A signs with two panels each with City name lettering and block number designed for heavy windlcading are 5570 for 8 foot signs and $540 for 6 foot signs if 20 are purchased or $566 and $536 respectively if 100 are purchased together. The 8 foot signs are used with longer street names or directional arrows. Curvent face design signs cost 5565 each for 8 foot signs and 5535 each for 6 foot signs with no significant difference in quantity purchases. A savings of $30 per decal (560 per sign) could be realized if the logo decals were purchased in a quantity of 100 or more directly by the City and then shipped to the manufacturer at time of fabrication. Those decals not needed for illuminated street name signs could be used on City vehicles, on windows at pertinent locations or for advertisin or publ' city purposes. 9 Current year or continuing traffic signal projects not already commmitted or under construction include ten new or modified intersections where four signs would be installed at each location for a total of 40 signs. These signs would be purchased 1n groups of eight or twelve as traffic sign,, installations are normally bid in groups of two or three to keep costs to a minimum. This would slightly increase costs over the group of 20 costs. ■ v� p. CCSR Re: Cost - Comparison' October 5, 198 Page 2 M COST SIM" (Based on 40 signs to groups of 8 or 12) ?. - Sign length Current Stan ODtton A UDtion B 6 Foot 38 0 555 - 21,090 38 @ 560 - 21,280 + 8 Foot 2 0 585 - 1.170 2 0 590 - 1.180 40 9 850 34,000 i Sign Ccst Totals $ 22,260 $ 22,460 5 34,000 ? Signal Construction Cost Estimates 5854,000 $854,200 $865,740 f �4t ` Sign Costs as a Percentage of Total Y- Construction Cost 2.6% 2.6% 3.7% F' " As the above figures show, using Option A adds minimally to present fiscal year traffic signal project costs. Using Optlon 8 (adding logos) adds $11,740 to project costs or less than 1.4 percent ever the 5854,000 present total construction cost estimate. -Y As presented previously, Option A signs would tend to be less legible than the current design and Optfcn 8 would have the same legibiI!V as z the current destan but would carry on the grape loqo them!. Respectfully submitted, :pam Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.110NGA STAFF REPORT Date: September 21, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8y: James T. Harris, Associate Civil Engineer fSM Subject: Consideration of a revised Traffic Signal Illuminated Street Hans Sign Face Design E2!E10y1_10_K Approve the new sign face design that adds the City's multi- colored logo to the present design of large white letters on a green background for use throughout the City. (Option 8 attachment) BMGRDLW /AMXYSIS: A request has been made to consider changing the design of the faces of illuminated street name signs used cn traffic signal mast arms. The most common sign face specified in Rancho Cucamonga, also used statewide, has only the street name in 8' upper ease and 64 lower case white letters on el geetc background the and block nerdy The current design esign Bused in vRancho Cucamonga is like the longer of the two in the accompanying graphics with white letters and border on a green background but without the grape logo. A variation to the present design was used to distinguish Civic Center Drive at Haven Avenue at the new City Hall and Civic Center complex. This design used a multi- colored grape logo on a beige background with black letters. The elements used on signs iInns Rancho Cucamongaoand lsewhere attached the usesofhthe street name type abbreviation above the appropriate block number is continued in both designs as this is a service to drivers. The inclusion of the City name as shown on the shorter of the two sign designs, is used by many cities. With city names, all lettering must be smaller so as to fit on the normal sign face height. With the City logo on the side of the sign face, some signs would need to be longer but, in most cases, letter sizes would remain the same as currently used. The logo would be the multi- colored grape logo used at the Civic Center and is similar to the logo used in the City s entry monuments. Use of the logo would carry this grape theme throughout the City. GYI CCSR September 21, 1988 Page 2 Street name signs should be *clearly visible to traffic approachingfrom all directions as IsreqWred by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 21366. Larger lettering would� terd .,to Inc"ease Mis visibility. Therefore, the signs.using the logo rather thin 'the City nam 'would better conform to the'CVC. Some concern has been,expresstd as to�the stability of illuminated street name signs in the high winds sometimes, experienced in.Raucho Cucamonga. The manufacturer who prod-ices -. the majority-,of this Vpe'.of-.sign was contacted regarding our recent sign 'specification, chingi.'� -,TMs specification change requires-- th.,t signs 'and their 'iounting- bardwire withstand 80 WH wind loading,(normal Is 70 WH) with gusts up to 125 MPH. The manufacturer has experiemented with heAvler duty hardware and' additional bolt-on brackets and feels cohfident -in ' meeting our specification. As new signs are Installed thGy must meet this specification. RRespeubaftted, RHM. TH: Attachment .9 luul � u� G� a° Q� ®o rco MEMO coo �� C� m 0 e 0 s A O O ,o nl gri 0O V �I lIIII V l LU PM 1i m ■ e� Y s.3._v�r &. ASb =SOC I AT E S, I NC 1240 N Jefferson St. Stitt Q An9wkn, CA 92w.7 l632 714/632 -3653 Csumf taaa. FicoerrsedHF�irCdslesisasof Yoe S W4—rsyTrwl RECi:f4gp September 26, t988 , SEP 281ygg Cucamonga County Water District P.O. Box 632 - rueamonga, CA 91730 Attenliom George B. Blanchard • Subject: Plow Test References Orchard and Sapphire California Rancho Cucamonga, Callfor YDear Sin t' TMs letter Is being provided to document the flow test taken this date at r ugh the results shown are accurate for the date approximately 7:45 a.m. Altho end time given, they may not accurately renect higher or lower readings which may vary due to seasonal conditions- ` Outlined below is the method, location and results of said now test• anted the static and residual were t hen from aehose ib bb Outlet On theathird ppNca houca east of Sapphire on the south side of Orchard. The results of this test were 46 PSI static, 32 PSI residual with an observed now of 804 GPM flowing from one 2 -1/2" outlet 123 PSI pitot tube pressure). This computes to 1318 GPM at 29 PSL questions t Lca, please do of hesitate to contact the undersigned u have any addtUonel Slncerely, B ARD, PNR�OVENCCHER St ASSOCIATES, NC. if /CMG t ti BEARD, PEFSIDENT 1Ruir Enclmure - Graph LWM%tk Fite SPWAk0 SA" LIFE wd PROPERTY Nc73EARD , PROVENCHER 8. ASSOCSATES , 3: NC - • -'- 1240 No JEFFERSON ST SUITE -'O', ANAHEIM, CA.- (714) 632 -3653 Nc FLOW TEST• GRAPH SHEET W •° _ _ Date 09 -26 -1988 �? E , 5: , P . r' 0 'e U r_ e P 9 I 0{1iWYWiiI1111iYYWYWWYf1i11 WIfIlYW11WI11ifilYY1 {f....Y111Bi...... lYlY11f11Y1E Ilia I11��i� 1011 Ills��ii"�� momm moolm m Elm =��a�� ME ml Wratar Flow GPM LETTER - DESCRIPTION A - Static Pressure of 40 0 p.s 1. 8 = Residual Pressure of 32.0 p s I. at 804.0 g P.m C= Residual Pressure of 20.0 p 8 1 at 1318.0 9 p m _W ✓ t b 1 WN 0 i 1' •YM4.. a :� 0 m . N ^ ` Nil �MMMMIMII BMW= 1501-11 lim Il Mu ° ' ~^~~'^ To: Mayor and Council Members of the city of Rancho Cucamonga From: Buel Anderson First, I would like to state that I agree with city policy concerning the undergrounding of utilities. A beautiful and esthetic city is desired by all. But I believe the present policy is unfair. I would appreciate the council members reading this letter prior to the council meeting of October 5th and with an open mind debate the fairness of the policy in public forum. Issue #1 I would like the council to appeal the decision which includes my personal residence (APN 201- 711-03) concerning the In lieu fees for the under- grounding of utilities. (100 feet frontage) The lot to question was and will continue to be upon project completion (tract #13367) a separate piece of propert,v. Although the lot was reduced by a road which cut off the rear portion of the property it is in no way an integral part of the development. The frontage on Amethyst remains the same and I am retaining the property. It is clear that a reduction to lot size with no additional building shoud not result in the owner being re- quired to pay for the undergrounding of utilitites. After all I have resided at the house in question for the past thirty years, long before the concept Of underground utilities. Issue #2 Should the city have the right to require private Property owners to pay for the undergrounding of utilities on government agency property such as Metropolitan Water District or Cat - Trans? The city undoubtedly realizes their inability to collect for the undergrounding of these utilities from ocher government agency landowners. The city is ,imply passing on that cost to the adjacent private lane owner. If we were concerned with flooding (drainage •� or propert damage issue, )the Policytwouldamake sense. However, underground utilities is an esthetic issue. ares'in apparent when the,fees to be collected that I beautif The city 1s, in essence, requiring Y Y neighbors property. In retrospect, such a policy concerning Tract 113367 or any other proposed tract i3 ludicrous. In short I am being punished not for who I am but for who my neighbors are. Therefore, I am 6sking that the city attorney respond on the legality of this decision, Issue f3 Should the city have the right to collect •tn lieu" fees for the undergrounding of utilities When there is every possibility thct such utilities when will not occur in the next 20 Years? As far as I can determine no lard owners in the immediate vicinity Of Tract OTT -367 have been assessed. In addition, Jthe proposed Foothill freeway is possibly twenty A away. It is unlik3lY that I, as owner of (A Pk 201 - 711 -03) or the future owners of tract homes 13367) will ever enjoy the fruits of their invest (1ment. In retrospect I think there should be a statute of limitations d (6 years ?) for small at which time in lieu fees utilities are for small developments are either refunded or the th undergrounded at that time, including e freeway property. I Would hate to think that I must `pay now and buy never° MY life t ime. or at least not in In summary, as a high school teacher with thiry years of ex- perience the one issue students most often look for 1n a teacher Is fairness - in assignments, 1n dlsciDllne, and especially n grading. Shouldn't we experience Chat same sense Of fairness from our city leaders? This Droperty owner con- tinues to hope so. Sincerely, �ca.E. QisrGt!Fitpc7+t 8uel Anderson �. -ran 1. p NCY a � Ed v �I z o C, 11 � W I a ; ci e � - 1. ♦ �w + P °�-^ • F jl O r September 28, 1988 •+ Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager 'i City of Rancho Cucamonga 9360 Baseline Road Unit 'A' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Lauren, Recently this District agreed to prepare a report and make a verbal presentation to the City Council relative to water system pressure zone design and operation. The report is presented for your use and distribution to members of the City Council. The undersigned will represent the District at ycur next Council Meeting on Wednesday, October 5, 1988. f you have any questions relative to this matter, please contact the undersigned Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT f� r George B. anchard, Jr. Assistant General Manager Enclosures GBBela L m^ a eevenLV & BRwoeN r seva t-Y {� OWE) lwOV.) a,rJ B• �. �y CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT �LOtJ W MiCHAIR. a, aaYp e0 • CuCAUOwoA CALIF 9671000" , -0 "t o' • "•. AsF as96 CHARLES A. WEST 1 aan AAe ua�uAAO�eO _ GEORGE A. KUTKENDALL JEROME M. WILBON R I• ROBERT NEUIELD. P—"4 a September 28, 1988 •+ Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager 'i City of Rancho Cucamonga 9360 Baseline Road Unit 'A' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Lauren, Recently this District agreed to prepare a report and make a verbal presentation to the City Council relative to water system pressure zone design and operation. The report is presented for your use and distribution to members of the City Council. The undersigned will represent the District at ycur next Council Meeting on Wednesday, October 5, 1988. f you have any questions relative to this matter, please contact the undersigned Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT f� r George B. anchard, Jr. Assistant General Manager Enclosures GBBela L m^ v° . V F'y[;Y?�ai S' �y� ,�..tii� AS `t Yr .y .- • . - Y4 �. �,.".�N. CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ._ P.O. 80E 630. CUCAMONGA. CAUP. 91730-0838 . 17141 987-2591 [ SY r r� September 23, 1988 MEMORANDUM TO: LAUREN M. WASSERMAN CITY MANAGER to CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA F: PROM: CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Lloyd W. Michael General Manager PRESENTED BY: George B. Blanchard, Jr. Assistant General Manager irtrNS .�� tl;�,'P. 1j1,�^(•; l)f(m�,p�, Y' .- CUCAMONOA COUNTY WATCR 017TRICT . P.O. sox 308. COOAKONOA. CALIf. Y17�0-0tt]e . p1U YB7.26G1 " PART ONE .? DESIGN AND GENERAL LAYOUT OF DISTRICT AND r' FIR. LOW PROCEDURES t F. !IMMEM L CUCAMONGA COVNTV WATER DISTRICT • P.O. 00% 000 • CUCAMONGA. CAU /. 917]0410]0 • 17141 9074591.1 It is our understanding that your office, plus members of the esteemed City Council are desirous of being informed as to the general design of our Water District with respect, to water pressure, pressure zone boundaries, fire flow characteristics plus an area of concern located generally at the southeast corner of Sapphire and Hillside ir1 the Alta Loma area. This transmittal will ble divided into two parts, the first dealing with the design and general layout of the District, plus fire flow procedures. The second part Will deal with the concerned area. In 1955 when the Cucamonga County Water District was originally designed, it was determined that its area would be divided in five e pressure zones. The season for this decision was based upon the physical characteristics of the land area, an area that sloped £roa 1020' above sea level at its lowest point up to 2394' above sea level at Reservoir No. 6. Ma 2;. wittlout the use of pressure zones, these two eievatiun: would have created a static water pressure along San Bernardino Lvenue, (4th Street), of 595.36 p.e.i. (pounds per square inch), •t pressure that would be unmanageable in a pipeline system. Costs to pump water up the slope would have been greatly increased due to larger pumpr end motors, or engines, plus greater quantities of elec- trical or natural gas would be required For these reasons and the need for storage facilities spaced along the slope to provide storage for fire suppression purposes and use durrrg pumpino failures due tc power outages the zone system in our D strict was developed —1— ti <clle ;CUCAMONOA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT • PO. 80x a39 . CUCAMONGA. CAUP. 91720-0666 • 17141987-2501, i µ - �•- �•p3''{�j. Y'1 The use of pressure zones reduces pumping costs and system design il costs while providing a dependable system for its consumers. ,•,�; Shortly after its initial construction, it was found that the number one zone was carried up the slope too far and created an excessive pressure along the bottom of the District. The zone was split creating six (6) total zones in the District. In recent times because of demand in the foothill area two (2) more zones have been created making a total of eight (8) primary zones within the District, each served by its own system of storage reservoirs. In the design of the system, the zones were designed along contour lines to create pressures ranging 40 to 140 p.s.i.. This is the general design criteria, there are areas where the top of a zone may fall below 40 p.s.i. and the bottom of a zone exceeds 140 p.s.i.. In all areas of the District the minimum pressure required for normal use, (25 p.s.i.), is exceeded. The following are three examples to illustrate how static pressure in determined, To determine the static pressure of water, the following 1nfoemation is requiredl 1001 of elevation a 43.33 p e 1. 1' of elevation o 0 4333 p.s.i. The difference in elevation between two points Y .' �..•,rt �;. �: w1tY1y��'i�'7911� A. in' CUCAMONOA COUNTY WATKn OIOTRICr P.O. 60x 636 • CUCAMONOA. CALJr. 91730,638 • 17141 987.2501 OY•r r -E X A M P L 8 Control elevation of Reservoir No. 5 is 21001 (the water "y? -' elevation when the - reservoir is full)." 101, a.. 1. Elevation at Amethyst and Hillside is 18951 ?� Static Pressure - (21001)- (18951) x 0.4333 Static Pressure . 2051 x 0.4333 - 88.83 p.s.i. 2. Elevation at Amethyst and Wil3on is approximately 1800, Static rressure - (21001) - (1800') x 0.4333 ;` Static Pressure - 3001 x 0.4333 - 129.9 p.s.i. "r 3. Elevation at Hillside and Sapphire is approximately m 20001 Static Pressure (20001)- (21001) x 0,4333 Static Pressure - 1001 x 0.4333 - 43.3 p.s.i. Attached for your information and use are excerpts from the Districts four (4) Master Plans, (1957, 1974, 1984 and 1987) dealing with pressure zones, their locations and design ranges. The subject of fire flow rates is a very different matter. -3- 'Y r IN CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT . P.O. 11OX 000 . CUCAMONGA. CAUT. 91730-0008 . 1714) 9072a91 ' It should be pointed out that until 1975 our area was serviced by y two (2) fire organizations, the Cucamonga Fire District and the - • i Alta Loma Fire District. Etiwanda was serviced by the State Division of Forestry. q) Print to 1974 there were no fire flow provisions required of {= developers other than fire hydrant locations. Flow tests were k-* generally limited to commercial and industrial developments and ' then only when required by insurance urderwriters. k The first fire flow ordinance, (as fnr as we know), was adopted in our area by the Cucamonga Fite District in 1974 and set a residential flow rate of 050 ).m, with a 20 p.s.l, residual pressure. I* i • The initial ordinance setting fire flow rates in the Alta Loma area was adopted on January 20, 1970 by the Foothill Fire Protectian District. That ordinance set the flow rate at 1000 g.p.m, with 20 p.s 1. residual pressure for single family dwellings on lean than one acre. The present fire flow rate for this type of structure is now set at 1500 g.p m for single story homes and 1750 g.p.m. for two story homes, both with 20 p.s.i, residual pressure. A fire rating study was performed in our area by Commercial Risk Services Inc., Insurance Service Office (I.S.O.) in 1979. A class four rating was awarded to the Fire District at that time. A past of the study was to review the water supply available for fire protection, our District would have been awarded a class two had it been evaluated separately. These rating studies are done at 10 -4- '.';, N. ••i {i:.�a..��a. ^.it �s:•i`- l_C:,i`;a�_ - ..w 1 ��ti°a.�:Y€° f CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT . P.O. BOX 630 • CUCAMONGA. CAUr. 91730-0630 • 17141 967.9091•- ' h r• l^ J to 15 year year intervals,, dependent upon growth. our Fire District is expected to be re -rated in 1989. I.S.O. also informs. us that their minimum flow rate requirement for a recognized fire hydrant is 250 g.p.m. for two hours or more at 20 p.s.i, residual pressure. ° At the present time, all new developments must meet the fire flow requirements as set forth by the Foothill Fire Protection District. Those requirements are in no way determined or monitored by the Cucamonga County Water District. C U C A N 0 N 6 A C O U N T Y W A T E R D I S T R I C T E X C E R P T FROM 1 9 5 7 O R I G I N A L • M A S T E R P L A N El RE-TYPED m, September 14, 1988 •�• V Section II'- GENERAL AREAL DESCRIPTION %. y. btu (3) an 8 -inch lain in Hillside Avenue extending 5600 feet easterly from Amethyst Street connections to the District's system, ,3 is There are 15 metered 4- �,,�,, at the present time, servicing 6 individual users and 12 water i' companies. 'i ' Two additional laterals one in Almond Avenue, extending 9 �? westerly from Amethyst Street, and the other in Hillside Avenue, S:y =A'+ also extending westerly from Amethyst Street, are to be constructed in the next few months. ✓(.� 2.04. PLOAesed p1esauce Zonee. To intelligently discuss an such as the Cucamonga county water District fr,)m an area engineering point -of -view, constant reference has to be made to In the June 1955 report prepared by this office, pressure zoning five pressure ones were recommended and these zones were approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the District The basis for the zoning was mainly on an agricultural basis, but consideration was given to conversion of the domestic -type zones in the selection of the controlling pressures and vater demands. This report accepts the five pressure zones pre,-iously plannrd, but adds two additional zones- -one in the very southerly portion of the District and another in the extreme northwest corner of the District. ® The proposed pressure zones are shown on plate No. 1 and a brief description "of each follows: Pressure ?one I. - Ptessure Zane I is that area within the District south of the Atchison, Topeka and Banta Pe Railway. Elevation within the zone varies from 1C20 to 1150. It is proposed that the elevation of any control reservoirs for this zone be located approximately at 1280. the total area within the zone lb 2720 acres. Pressure &one II_ Pressure Zone II is that area between Red 1.` Hill and Baseline Road on the north and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Pe Railway on the south. 3levatiors within the zone range %'e. Crom 1100 to 1325. The control tessrvoir 13 at Elevation 1421, Y V,. ' ;, � giving a pressure range across the zone from 41 psi to 139 psi. Total area within the zone is approximately 4:" cres. pr se �r zgne II2_ Pressure Tone III is unat area generally south of the proposed freeway along Highiand Avenue, with a few modificat.ans, and north of Baseline "sad. The Red Hill area, however, is within this pressure zone Elevations within the zone range from 1300 to 1590. The control reservoir is at Elevation 1658, giving a pressure range ac-oss the zone from 30 psi to 155 psi Total area within the zone is approximately 3740 acres. Pressure Zone IV. Pressure Zone IV has an irregular boundary on the north which is generally along Wilson Avenue in ® itc eastern sector and along Banyan Street in the western sector. PressDre zone V. Pressure zone V has a very irregular northerly boundary that roughly parallels the contour at Elevation 2000. Elevations within the zone range Er a 178^ to 2000. "he control reservoir is at Elevation 2100, 4 vino a pressure range across the zone of from 43 psi to 139 psi •ctrl area within the zone is approximately 1610 acres. Pressure zone VI_ Pressure zone VI has as its northerly boundary the northerly boundary of the District, except in the northwest corner. Elevations within the zone range from 2000 to 2280 The control reservoir is at Elevation 2392, giving a pressure range across th^_ zone of from 48 psi to 170 pai. Total area within the zone is approximately 1620 acres Presence Zone VII., Pressure Zone V1I is a small portion of land in the very northwest corner of the District that is too high to be served by the District's existing reservoir at Elevation 7392. Elevations within the zone range from 2280 to 2580. Since the area is small (total area is approximately 120 acres) it is proposed that this area eventually be served by a small tank and pumping station. r . The s,;utherly boundary coincides, of course, with the northerly ' boundary of Pressure zone III. Elevations within the zone range ' from 1500 to 1800 The cor rol reservoir is at Elevation 1879, giving a pressure range across the zone of from 34 psi to 164 psi. Total area within the zone is approximately 2840 acres. PressDre zone V. Pressure zone V has a very irregular northerly boundary that roughly parallels the contour at Elevation 2000. Elevations within the zone range Er a 178^ to 2000. "he control reservoir is at Elevation 2100, 4 vino a pressure range across the zone of from 43 psi to 139 psi •ctrl area within the zone is approximately 1610 acres. Pressure zone VI_ Pressure zone VI has as its northerly boundary the northerly boundary of the District, except in the northwest corner. Elevations within the zone range from 2000 to 2280 The control reservoir is at Elevation 2392, giving a pressure range across th^_ zone of from 48 psi to 170 pai. Total area within the zone is approximately 1620 acres Presence Zone VII., Pressure Zone V1I is a small portion of land in the very northwest corner of the District that is too high to be served by the District's existing reservoir at Elevation 7392. Elevations within the zone range from 2280 to 2580. Since the area is small (total area is approximately 120 acres) it is proposed that this area eventually be served by a small tank and pumping station. 'y"ir "l_•a vn S' *y�yy* %{�y+>'e'b•.�'+i%a26Yri 1�"•6 `' - •:%.::✓• :P�-- ;.x.._. <y,.:.,'\y�gf9ii;:a v: .q= °.Cfl�'s: `'. f.y.3'a,.e + r-+"+ y., i' Y'` ,ii.Y�pV.i,y, ✓..�;3'r)7:' -k-.i " .+� sr r. `J1tr"�'°y1'J±•j Wt In summa[ the data on the 4 proposed pressure zones follow. in Table 2, Proposed Control Pressure Total Pressure Elevation Range Area Zone No. (msl) (psi) (acre) I 1280 56 -112 2720 ' II 1421 41 -139 4240 III 1658 30 -155 3740 IV 1879 34 -164 2840 V 2100 43 -139 1610 ' VI 2392 43 -170 1620 VII 2680 43 -173 120 The above listed maximum pressures are rather high, generals higher than what is considered good practice However, the area is very steep and division of the area into a greater number of pressure zones to keep the maximum pressures lower cannot economically be done The areas within each of the zones that experience these high pressures are small, however, and it is believed that installation of pressure reducing valves will be justifiable goNOTE, Re -typed from the 1957 Original Faster Plan. E El A—DIr A V., Exc , erpt- From CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT WATER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAY 1974 jAKM M. ploNTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS.INC. PASA010A 6 ISVINI I " jOL,, . 19MCCULA . UPLAKO . WALW4T CAM Sol.. FORT LAUDEADAL9 - LAS VlOAl H SECTION IV - DESCAIPT(ON OF DISTRICT OWNED FACILITIES 4.01 GENERAL in 1955, the DistricNa voters approved a bond linen in the amount of 51.2 million to finance construction of the initial backbone system upon which all water system development since has been based. This system was com- pleted and became operational in 1956. The basis for the original design is contained in a report prepared by this office and dated June, 1955, for providing supplemental water to all elevations of the District from the MWD Upper Feeder. Two years later the District commissioned this office to expand upon the original study and develop a Master Plan for water system development. which we Id be the basis for a Diatrict -wide municipal water system. The voters, once again, supported a bond Issue in the amount of $3. 7 million to Implement the plan. The proceeds of both bond Issues have been confined to the purchase of water rights and other physical facilities of various water companies, and the construction of additional primary facilities.. Primary facilities are defined as those facilities which are of general be fit to the entire District and its inhabitants. Diu•ing the intervening years, there has been substantial growth and de- velopment within the District. Developers and Improvement Districts have constructed the secondary facilities required by this growth. Secon- dary facilities are defined as those facilities of local benefit to specific properties or sub -areas of the District.. This section of the report will describe the system and the existing pri- mary and secondary facilities owned by the District and displayed on Plate II herein. 4.02 PRESSURE ZONE SYSTEM Any discussion of the Cucamonga County Water District system from an engineering point of view must constantly make reference to pressure zones. The original five zone system was expanded to seven in the 1957 plan. Elevations selected for reservoirs permitted a minimum of 35 psi to u maximum of 170 pat. These are the extremes and, ideally, an effort has been trade to keep the minimum nearer to 40 psi. The pressure zones, shown on Plate II and summarized In Table IV-1, are described in the following subsections. Iv -1 ��Y �'' f�1' - i�1 r r • i ^�ttif SECTIO14 IV - DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT OWNED FACILITIES n (a) Pressure Zone 1 Pressure Zone I Includes the area south of the Atcheson, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway main line. The southerly boundary is generally San ,+tl, Bernardino Avenue excepting east of RochesOe- where the line is co -term- -;?,' hate with the San Bernardino Freeway. of Lion within the Zone varies from 1000 feet to 1150 feet. A control et atten for the proposed raser- `.' voirs to serve this area should have a roar mum water surface elevation of 1280 feet. The total area within the Zone, excluding the south - westerly _xc portion served by the City of Ontario, is approximately 3579 acres. :t (b) Pressure Zone 11 Pressure Zone II Includes the area between Red Hill and 1320 feat south of Baseline Road on the north with the Atcheson, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway on the south. Elevations within the Zone range from 11 OC feet to 1325 feet. ' The control reservoir maximum water surface elevation to 1421 feet, which provides a pressure range from 41 psi to 139 pal. Total area within r the zone to approximately 5922 acres. 3y_ tM (c) Pressure 2aue DI i• Pressure Zone III Includes the area generally south of the proposed Foothill Freeway near Highland Avenue and north of Baseline Road. The Red Hill area north of Foothill Boulevard to within this Zone. Elevations within the e Zone range from 1300 feet to 1590 feet. The principal maximum water surface control elevation Is 1658 feet. The Red Hill area is a subzone within this Zone and has a control elevation of approximately 1600 feet. The pressure range across this Zone is from 30 pal to 155 psi. Total area within the Zone Is approximately 4678 acres. (d) Pressure Zone IV Pressure Zone IV has an Irregular northerly boundary along Wilson Avenue east of Amethyst and along elevation 1800 feet west of Amethyst. The southerly boundary is the northerly boundary of Zone W or generally along elevation 1500 feet. The control reservoir elevation Is 1879 feet, provid- ing a pressure range from 34 psi to t64 p +t. Total area within the Zone is approximately 3563 acres IV -2 M, E (f) Pressure Zone VI The northern boundary of Pressure Zone VI is the original District boundary (generally Power Line Road) up to elevation 2280) and the southern boundary generally parallels the elevation contour of 2000 feet. The control reservoir is at Elevation 2392; giving a pressure range across the zone of 48 to 170 pal. The total area within the zone is approximately 1653 acres. , (g) Pressure Zone VII Pressure Zone VII is presently divided Into three separate areas lying to the north of Pressure Zone VI. Water facilities have never been required to nerve these areas; however, when necessary, special studies should - be conducted to determine the most efficient method to serve any proposed development. Listed from went to east the zones are described as follows: Elevation Approximate Zone Range Area (acres) VIIA 2280 - 2580 120 VIIB 2280 - 2810 160 VIIC 2280 - 3660 548 A tab,ilation of pressure zone statistics is presented in Table IV -1, IV -3 •.•,. 1 }1M v4; .. ' -• * 'V� �' fig :' 1 X SECTION IV -- DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT OWNED FACILITIES (e) Pressure Zone V., ' The northern boundary of Pressure Zone V is also irregular and generally parallels the elevation contour of 2000 feet. The elevation ranges from . ' 1780 feet to 2000 feet, with a reservoir control elevation of 2100 feet. The pressure range fa from 43 pat to 139 psi. Total area within the Zone is approximately 1676 acres.- E (f) Pressure Zone VI The northern boundary of Pressure Zone VI is the original District boundary (generally Power Line Road) up to elevation 2280) and the southern boundary generally parallels the elevation contour of 2000 feet. The control reservoir is at Elevation 2392; giving a pressure range across the zone of 48 to 170 pal. The total area within the zone is approximately 1653 acres. , (g) Pressure Zone VII Pressure Zone VII is presently divided Into three separate areas lying to the north of Pressure Zone VI. Water facilities have never been required to nerve these areas; however, when necessary, special studies should - be conducted to determine the most efficient method to serve any proposed development. Listed from went to east the zones are described as follows: Elevation Approximate Zone Range Area (acres) VIIA 2280 - 2580 120 VIIB 2280 - 2810 160 VIIC 2280 - 3660 548 A tab,ilation of pressure zone statistics is presented in Table IV -1, IV -3 I ' 1Jy I � , E IV-4 P SECTION IV - DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT OWNED FACILITIES TABLE IV-1 • PRESSURE ZONES Control Approximate Pressure Elevation(l) Pressure Area -Zone No. JMILL_ Range (psi) (acres) 1 1280(2) 56-I2I 3579(3) If 1421 41-139 sgzz 111 1658 30-155 4678 IV 1879 34-164'* 3563 V 2100 43-139 1676 VI • 2392 48-170 1653 VIIA Izo VIIB 160 VUC 548 (1) Maximum water ;urface (Z) Proposed reservoirs (3) Does not Include south - westerly portion served by the City of Outaric IV-4 P r :s i lux CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Excerpt From 1992 WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN JAMES M. MONTGOMERY,CONSULnNG ENGINEERS.INC- .m Water Requirements is The historical and projected water demands are summarized in Figure 4-2. A very rapid rise In water requirements is projected between the years 1980 and 20001 after which there is a leveling off of demand at nearly 43,000 ace -feet per year at ultimate development in the year 2010. WATER REQUIREMENTS BY PRESSURE ZONE Table 4-4 shows the methodology in developing the District's ultimata water requirements by pressure zone. 'the water requirements by pressure zones are utilized to develop the moat cost-effective means of utilizing water supply ==can and to ensure accurate modeling of future water demands In a computer hydraulic network analysis. Table 4-5 shows a summary of the water demand by pressure zone for 1980, 1990, 2000, and ultimata water requirements. This summary of water demand by zone was obtained by repeating the analyst* shown in Table 4-4 far each of the four time periods. These data are crucial in locating future sources of supply and future water distribution system facilities. Pressure Zones 7 and 8 are projected to provide service to the undeveloped areas west of Deer Creek Canyon up to elevation 2800. The land use projected in the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan indicates minimal residential use for this aces. Hence, a future average annual demand of rougbl_• 65 gpm was calculated for this area and is Mated to Table 4-5. A review of Table " indicates that water demands is pressure zones 2, 31 4, 5, and 6 are expected to be roughly double their current values within 30 years. Water demand In Zone 1 is expected to be over three times its current value by the year 2010. This is because Zone 1 Is projected to have major industrial development. Water Requirements Eased on Population To ensure that the water requirements based on land use accurately portray future water demands, population estimates are used to verify the water requirements. The results of this verification are shown in Table 4-6. As can be seen, the water requirements based an population and the water requirements based on land use are very similar. There is a ten than 30 percent dtfferen:e between the ultimate water requtrament estimate of 42.5 mgd based on pcpula- tion and the 38.3 mgd estimate based on land use, i Water requirements based on population involve estimates of per capita con- sumption. Per capita use in 1980 wes approximately Z90 gallons per capita per day. This per capita consumption is aswmed to decrease as low density housing and agricultural land use with high irrigation use are replaced by higher density residential, commercial and industrial land usas. These changes reduce the per capita consumption. Far this Master Plan the per capita consumption at ultimate development is assumed to decease to a level of Z50 gallons per capita par day in the year 2010. The Z50 gpcd figure Is typical for similar communities is southern ® California. 4-5 $ m7 « f" - % RiquIrements 4-6 § IN � I § ^ . ® . , . - � � - % . { § _& \ 2 . K7 210 ]° 07 §| f " ! i -,/ | | / \ | � I 4-6 § IN � I § ;��y._ 7.:. }{+•r.':�.flG1 `rr�Y'c'°c'",`j:�` . `..j�'' .. .�- rR._ � K'.�.�., Water Requfremeats E 1 r a 0 acne a�eo �eoo lwno wNlo^e ! «Pg 1.01 -o wbo as N 0 o e o ^o p o 0 ;!2 •O fN • 1 O.M1,1 • 1 9 • 1 .OpFOtl FOHr OOP .O Vw�0.0 PLAIN -41 NrN ONOO Nrr NPrO �Nw �PNF �.F"na P�Ftl PlNN N.�I+a a�: �y � ; otlN�. n« rri In ei .ov �PF� X00 PO awl1 n M.liN N =tialA R4. NnPAI Nn F! Ii ww ^tl IV i. xzs N N ON CON �'Avt a 's e e 8 e B $9 co � 3 9� Q yna •G�fi l� g g� � 9 Sob ° <9 o. 1 pa0J ' w F 2 1 < 1 w �Q yh i E 1 r a 0 acne a�eo �eoo lwno wNlo^e ! «Pg 1.01 -o wbo as N 0 o e o ^o p o 0 ;!2 •O fN • 1 O.M1,1 • 1 9 • 1 .OpFOtl FOHr OOP .O Vw�0.0 PLAIN -41 NrN ONOO Nrr NPrO �Nw �PNF �.F"na P�Ftl PlNN N.�I+a a�: �y � ; otlN�. n« rri In ei .ov �PF� X00 PO awl1 n M.liN N =tialA R4. NnPAI Nn F! Ii ww ^tl IV i. xzs N N ON CON �'Avt a 's e e 8 e B $9 co � 3 9� Q yna •G�fi l� g g� � 9 Sob ° <9 o. 1 m N zz aQ Bz �op x �a I m < w O pI U� I r-?- J, ;'+S,,Wetw Req- W'mmmL $ 3 z s 0.t .. is I r a-& m e o n gaga 'Z Z M it 3 9 %JIB �. n A � d sl p p VQ iC, ((�88J��✓JJ z s 0.t .. 4 -8 to 'o d M RIM e ya V � a a till aKIN .9�us90 i 'F 1.4 5 I r it 4 -8 to 'o d M RIM e ya V � a a till aKIN .9�us90 i 'F 1.4 M I . y ._ Water Aequiremaats •- Summary of Future Water Rc fdiiments - '?' •, ' The land use water'requdmunenis abowu�in Table 4-5 serve a i"basis for this•, '�' _• Muter Plan. The projection of Wtuio land we from the various genual plans • 7 ,. encompassing the study a »a ate more reliable in projecting future development. Water requirements bard on popn1atl0u estlmates are subject to-mmewhat'more uncertainty due to (1) general uncertainty regarding population growth and (2) the projected per capita'cansamptl006 In idditlous; the utiAzsti m of 'and use as the baaus for development of water requirements permlti'a more detailed projection of future water requirements - pressure sane by preanrs zone. CORRELATION TO ?REWOUS WATER REQUIREMENT MUTATES The 1974 water system master plan estimated an annual water requirement of 22,855 acre -feet in the year 1990 and 43/175 acre-foot annually by the year 2020 (the year of ultimate development). Table 4-S in this roport indicates as estimate of 32.496 acre• feet per year in the year 1990 and 42,934 acre -fact per year at ultimate developmezt In the year 2010. Hence, the difference between the 1974 report and this master plan is principally the projected rata of !mesas in the water requirement{ the that total water requirem®t at ultimata development is ,:pprmdmately the same. The high rate of inmeace in projected water demand of this mater plan is due to rerlmd growth projectloah which indicate a much faster development than was foreseen in 1974. This point is illustrated by the fact that the population in the 1974 Muter Plan was estimated to be apprasimately 33,000 in the Year 1980 whamu the 1980 cemua for the City of Rancho Cucamonga showed a population of 55,250. FLUCTUATION IN DEMAND Historical fluctuatlw in demand is illustrated by Figure 4 -1. This figure shows a peat in water demand during the cummer, months of Judy and August, and a minimum water requirement in the months of January, February and March This coincides with the low rainfall and high irrigation Mmands of the summer and its relatively high rainfall and low irrigation demands of the winter. M --inure and minimum historical seasonal flow variation from 1975 to 1980 is listed in Ta!de 4-T. The average of the maximum month to average month demand is 1.63 and the avctage of the minimum month to average month flour is 0.46. q-y i S� e!14:� w: -'l . ` f'- c23 +' , -�, a � n�:v._�.. •e. �4.y.. .. CUG%ONOA COUNTY WAT9R O`37g1 T • P.O. 90% 6]6 • CUCAYONGA.V GUf- 917]006]8 ' • f71�1 9o>;:as91 PART TNO CONCERNED AREA ORCHARD STREET • BETWEEN SAPPHIRE AND JASPER n L J +A P r- F M Excerpt From Water System Master Plan Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. June 1987 e. Existing Water System Facilities The existing District water system facilities are deserited in this section. The major elements making up the District's system include grnnndwater wells, a surface water treatment plant, storage reservoirs, booster pumping stations, pressure regulating stations, and its transmis- ' Sion and distritrution piping. Section 6 prese'lts an evaluation of the I existing facilities based tryon existing and future water demands. Figure )a2 contained in the back of this report shows the major existing feetuw of the District's water syates. PRES.= Tw'IiS The existing water supply system of the District is divided into :dm major pressure zones, which are aligned from south to north in acrardance vith the topographic fasturss of the District. The features of the District's pressure zees are listed in Table 6-1. Prescaro Zone 1 cowers the lowest elevations within the ::istrimt, ranging frar, approximately 1.000 to 1,150 feet. Pressure zone 6 covers thu highest elevations within the District, ranging from 2,700 to 2.030 feet. Pressure Zone 2 has the argest amount of developed acreage as well as the largest water demmxil Pressure zones 7 and 6 both have a minim m of development and few existing water demands. Pressure zones hex. been established so that water service pressure is typically within the range of 40 to 140 pounds per square inch (psi), depending upon the specific zone (although in a few older areas of service, pressure may be marginally lower). The District designs its pipelines and reservoirs to maintain a minimum of 30 psi even during peak flow condi- tions, which betters the state goal of 25 psi minimm. With tht exception of Zone 7, all of the zones have at least one storagw raservoir. rn addi- tion to the nine major pressure zones, the District ram proposed subzones in zones 5 and 6. These scbrones will exist due to gexxlraphnc restrictions that make a continuous pressure zone difficult to implemun� (e..l., Day Creek floodplain in Zones 5 end 6). In these sub:mes, water =Or be u supplied either from the zone above or the zone below; a subtome cannot be fed from a zone with similar elevation. 6 -1 C,n,.m CHEaSE4 r watEE v,a E 6-2 CAMP OnESSER I WKEE INC, F. ffiAFAC1FitIS1TCS OF nTSTRYCr•PRESSURE zwES I Reservoir Presiure Control rdrlch -Eievatt Zone 'Oro Serves Zone V Existing z 1 1280 1(31 2 1421 2,2A 3 1050 3,3C 3A!31 1600 ah 4 1 11-179 C,4B,4C 5 2100 5'5B 6 2394 6 7 2660 7 8 2926 OR Proposed 5r 2100 5C 6C 2394 Nona Maximse rotor surface elevation in reservoir. falwater is boosted fr® Reservoir 1 by Pump Station 1A. Redhill area. The existing Reservoir 6B is to be replaced vith a larger reservoir at the contLoi elevation. The existing reservoir has a Meter elevation of 2,432. (51high Uder construction. 6-2 CAMP OnESSER I WKEE INC, F. CUCAMONGA COUNTY WAT6e OlarnlCT . F.O. 90x eDa . CUCAMONGA. CAUF. 91730-0625 . 17141 9a74591 In recent years concern has been - xpreseed to the Water District about low water pressure on Orchard Street between Sapphire and Jasper, eventually that concern was extanded to include homes on the south side of Bl:,side between Salph!re and Jasper and on Vinmar, west of Sapphire. The concern rentered around the ideas that pressures were } maintained in a substandard fashion. As calls came in to the District they were individually answered by sending a service represen -ative to the area and making pressure checks. At no time did our people encounter the pressure readings that were being i claiu,..; however, enough inquiries were made that a more thorough .; inves,tigation was made. • A atidy of the area through the use of a pressure recording device revealed that a large pressure drop did take place in the early morning hours, (u3ually between 3 and a a.m.), and again in the early evening a lessor pressure drop. This work was done during August of 1987 Similar inquiries had been made in previous years; however, they had not ueen as numerous, as in 1987. E During SeptembeL of 1987 the consumers coaxing the inquiries were told that several steps would be taken in an effort to solve their concetnn The attached letters by the District date6 September :1, 1987, September 25, 1987 and January 21, 1988 described the work panned Ay the District and some of the results attained. It should be toted here that during the described work of checking all gate +elves for proper operation, one gate valve was found to be entir^ y closea When that valve was opened, pressure in the area -6— CUCAMONOA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT • PO. BOX 000 • CUCAMONOA. CALIF 01700-0000 • 17141 0073506 S increased i+ameoiately, from 50 p.s.i, to GO p.s.i.. At this point actual work was stopped and the District tegan a plan of continued monitoring of the area, u ;r , I JPUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 9041 S." EIEHAN01110 M • C11CA,101,41 C."r. 01,00 • 0. 0 .IH $30 • 0E, t)01 VICTOR A. CHERBAK. JR.. FM September 21, 1987 Tor / R Y RoscRr NeurcLo E.w1 Cn YOB,., LIA)YO W. MICHAEL VL - EARLE R. ANDERSON BEVERLY e. BRADEN CHARLES A. WEST 3 s Wa Mr. Emmet Posey 8326 Orchard Street a Alta Loma, CA 91701 Re) Low Hater Pressure Orchard, Sapphire ;} to Jasper ! Dear Sir) This letter is to advise you of the progress being made into the low water pressure problem in your consumption area'. District staff does not feel that the problem is as much a result i of low pressure as it is of low volumo. As was discussed with >- you at our Board Meeting of September 15, 1987, we feel the problem may be one of inadequate pipeaine capacities. r' Since the meeting of September 15, 1987, we have done the following work relative to this matter: A Researched all of Zone 5 piping in an effort to pinpoint weak, or missing, zone piping. B. Checked zone pressure LOOM Turquoise to Amethyst along the top of the zone. C. Researched all customer accounts in the immediate area as to the present met9r size. As a result of this work we are considering the following work to be done) 1. Change out customer metes to the next larger size. 2 Create a small sub -zone. 3 Install a pressure regulating station to bring in water from the next higher zone. ,�e��: •nn sg:,>.I. rya =`7;� sc��t. _ - _ _:- �; f'°; � :iil;; CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 9041 RAN CZRNAROINO ROAD CUCAMONGA. CAUP. 91730 Low Water pressure September 211 1987 Page 2 4. Install larger pipelines to allow greater flow volume ky T into the area. Item 4 is a long range plan while i.ema 1 6 3 can be done more quickly while the work involved in 4 is being planned. aAt the present time we do not have any dates or work schedules set up; however, you will be notified prior to any construction .? work taking place. 4 If you have any questions relative to this matter, please contact tha undersigned. I Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT • GeeEge B. Blanchard, Jr. Assistant General Manager GBBIla E ,CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER .DISTRICT ae +...AOm aw o no . ava.."GA c 1+130.o29 a.. �. VICTOR A. CNLROAK. JR.. F—. 8 September 25, 1987 i r Mr. Lee Grimes y 8489 orchard Street ,e9 Alta Loma, CA 91701 Re: Low Water Pressure orchard, vicinity of Jasper, sipphire, Hillside b vinmar ry,lr.w,Y .11 kGarRT NQurrLO LLOYD W. MIL'NAaL rAR K R. ANOCRSON OLV[R-_y x• aRAOtN CHARLES A. WKST Dear Sic: joCk Thin letter effort totoadvise O Of the sec%ice intotyourlac a. place The planned work will be accomplished in several phases, and they are as follows: 1. In orer to :Icrease meter d will be n replaced lwith none ofcgreate greater existing meter, 5/8' X 3/4', capacity is 20 9•P•m- b proposed meter, 3/4', capacity is 30 g.P.m- This work should take place between September 28, 1987 and October 9, 1987. 2 control mainalinefinworchard Streetaonethelwest aide of Jasper. in addition, all main line valves in the main line from the reservoir will be exercised to insure proper operation. This work will be done between October 1, 1987 and octoher 15, 1987. 3 A pressure regulating valve will be installed between the Zone 6 - 8' main in Sapphire and the Zone 5 - 12' ® main in Sapphire Street Both mains are located at Orchard street. After installation, the regulator will , •',y° .•9s•: ,�t- yt�Y� "'^�_a�'u aary��},Y,'"Ar�i ^s .r;. r,..�f a'sr, ,; - a�;� •-•d �c '-� ^f%� -=':�, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATLN-D1STMCT • 9"1 SAN UaRNARDINO ROAD • CUCAMONGA. CAUF. 917]0 4, be set to maintain 60 p:s•i. on Orchard Street between Sapphire Street and Jasper Street. The work on this part of the project.should be ? accomplished between October 5, 1987 and October 16, 1987, ` During the times that Work is being accomplished water pressure i readings will be takan to insure that progress is being made, and s after all work is done, pressure recorders Will be placed at 3Y various points to ineure that the proper pressure is being ' maintained. ,R. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. 4 e Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT IAZ:5y George B. Blanchard, Jr. Assistant General Manager SGBBsla E. 16 I BNSRLY Z BMOW s..r.w C.+w.1 Y•rwr "ONC,A COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOYD W. MIGHAM a 1>10 •oiwo +o . eve •vo +a• e•ur •n ao oua • •o +o. .a+ .0 +a :u. OC P ID A. WKST G60ROa A. KUYKeNDALL nooemy N[U /SLD, P, JSROMC M. WILSON January 21, 1988 Hr. Ronald Hurwit 8439 Hillside Road Alta Loma, CA 91701 Re, Low Hater Pressure Orchard, vicinity of Jasper, Sapphire, 0 Hillside a Vinmar Dear Sir: This letter is to advise you of the progress that has been made to improve service into your area. In our letter to you dated September 25, 1987 we outlined three items of work to be performed in an effort to lesson the problem of low pressure in your area. As of this date, your water meter has been changed to a larger size in order to eliminate a poesible restriction and to increase volume into your home. All mainline valves have been exercised to insure their operation and to be certain that they were full open During that part of the project we found a valve nearly closed, opening that valve increased water pressure by 10 p.s.i. immediately After this work was completed, the system pressure in the area was monitored very closely and found to have increased substantially on the minimum side, (see the attached Table A from 10/24/87 to 11/12/87). During the first part of November 1987 a pressure reading was taken on your side of your water meter, the attached Table 8 lists the pressure readings and shown only one reading less than 50 p.s i All readings were taken between the hours of 1000 ` '.CAMONaA COWM WAlta WS"MT . F.O. a0% 93! • CUCAMONGA. CALV. 917000939 . (714) 9973491 DI, i' water Preastlre ' luary 21, 2988 .ge 2 V a.m. and 2i00 p.m., y The subject area is scheduled for continued monitoring beginning in February and continuing or1 a schedule through June 1988. Your continued cooperation in this matter will be appreciated. Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT x George B. Blanchard, Jr. • Assistant General Manager `.6 Encl. GBB,la E u a 5 kul Q S iii 3`` si i r i U.. W r. s LS i - i L 't, a kul to 0 a U.. W r. i L F F i f i= 2 F.-, .. +_ ��i ffzFSS::fa =iiaei?nsagi3ffs:fss lilt SSL "eeFE=cc •s SL .i L: 7. •ter xi: : =S I ■ W s o e:e zzxxx � r f i L F F i f i= 2 F.-, .. +_ ��i ffzFSS::fa =iiaei?nsagi3ffs:fss lilt SSL "eeFE=cc •s SL .i L: 7. •ter xi: : =S I ■ �Nl vl CUCAMON4A COUNTY WATIR DISTR= �.o. sox s3s cur_A�N*A. GUI. O173"038 M0 987-20st I eq T A B T., E ADDRESS PRESSURE, P.S.I. 8471 Hillside Road 55 C455 Hillside' Road 55 8439 fjillsida Road 50 8423 Hillside Road so • 0407 Hillside Road 48 0391 Hillside Road so 8343 Hillaide"Road so 5556 Jasper Street 55 • 5536 Jasper street 55 5516 Jasper Street 55 8390 Orchard Street 60 8406 Orchard Street 60 8422 Orchard Street 60 6438 Orchard street 65 8454 Orchard Street 65 8470 Orchard Street 65 8449 Orchard Street 70 8473 Orchard Street 65 8459 Orchard Street 65 8443 Orchard street 65 8429 Orchard Street 65 8413 Orchard Street 60 8397 Orchard Street 70 8381 Orchard Street 60 8367 Orchard Street 60 8351 Orchard Street 53 8337 Orchard Street 55 8323 Orchard Street Ss 8307 Orchard street 54 8308 Orchard Street 54 8326 Orchard Street 54 8342 Orchard Street 55 0358 Orchard Street 55 8374 Orchard 60 5625 Vinmar Avenue 53 �S Y; j .p? In early spring of 1988 we received a letter stating simply that w 'with spring comes low water pressure," After checking this A ,+ i) cucAmomoA COUNTY WAT[R U1sm= . r o. sox 63a . CUCANONOA. CALIF. 017300000. 17141 0a7.C501 �S Y; w� In early spring of 1988 we received a letter stating simply that w 'with spring comes low water pressure," After checking this A ,+ - comment, the District determined to install a pressure regulator .4� .Y to allow the passing of higher pressure water into the affected �G? area. Our intention was to maintain a constant 60 p.s.i.J however, in so doing we restri =tad, flow into the area creating a ?1• leas than desirable fire flow condition, when this situation 1v became evident, the District took the reg,,Ntor out of service and returned to its normal pattern of service into the area. Attached a� for your information is a copy of the fire flow test made on i t_ August 8, 1988. That teat indicates a fire flow of 4883 g.p.m. (gallons per minute) at 20 p.s.i. residual, approximately three times the flow required by the Foothill Fire protection District. 3. a -8- J.. I 1240 N Jetteradn SL SuPA O Aft"o" C ., Tt46IIJH7 , 1NC.1tALwuTT "'S covershec4 -. wE ARK SENDING YOU ❑AttaNed ❑UMet yeparate ^J Pants 0 PLOT O � ew.ts m fl.,t l r Coot al kites O ']uap ref Y+�a a�4�� 04c ��pa�au��raa THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as Necked Belo° O Apdo+eo e> wd mted O Fd aowmAI ('' O��Fd� roar uu 0 A ed pGrW as noted Qg � ,,qV ed ❑ Rft,r m Inl cc r t 1 Q Fd renew No r nt 0- OFOR BIDS OUE --��i9 n O spwa turns ❑11mbmit -== Id aooro'ral SuMet� Wl" k tar oiflnWton 0 Retw• corrected petit 0 pRINTs RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO Us r` ri COPY TO y1GNED1. N anelovm+ wr rot o near4 tiW naoM �n at dK+. q & AS SOC 1 AT E S, INC ' 1210 N )dferwn Sr— Stile Q Arnhem. CA 92807-1532 714 /632 -3653 (aarOsr. fermmn se/ I(1/ndr (i4dniest d f in.4yraflrr.5l•�m� August a, 1988 Cucamonitn County water District P.O. Din 638 Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attentions Henry Rutledge Operations Superintendent Subject: Flow Test Reference: Sapphire St. and Orchard, Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Sin This letter is being provided to document the now test taken AupLsl S. 1988 at Approximately 1100 p.m. Although the results shown are Accurate for the date and time given, they may not accurately reneet higher or lower readings which may very due to seasonal conditions. Outlined below Is the method, location and results of said last. and that static and Iresi hydrant were located an the mouth W@st comer of ■ hydrant located on the southpe east and of r Sapphire and Orchard. The results of INS test were 81 PSI static, 0 PSI residual flowing 373 GPM. It should be noted at this time that the above mentioned test was conducted using the pressure regulating valve as the sole Source 01 water for this area. Test sit The Italia And residual were taken from the hydrant at Vinmar and Sapphire and the f owing hydrant Sou located at Sapphire and Orchard. The rrWta of this test stalle. 43 PSI F*slojg with an observed flow of 1491 GPM were 74 t/3" outlets simultaneously (11 PSI pilot tube ppeeretre oath ouUN). This computM to two 3- 48/3 GPM at 10 PS4 qumtloreM pisuve do not hesitate to eteccntact theaadsrslgnoA a have any Additional Sincerely, RD,(�/+�RO�VHNCyIHR 8t ASSOCIATES, tHC, Ctrl BEA C6; pR6'IIDHNT Enclosures - Two graphs $i ccl Cucamonga County water District P.O. Hla 131 Cucamarlg�, CA 01730 Altnt Lloyd N. Michael General Manager Aaw..rk rw spiakir■ sear hue aW rAOM Y. Wets..- blow GPM LETTER DESCRIPTION A a static Praaaura of 74.0 P.s.i. 6 a Raslnual Praasura of 66.0 V.S.L. at 1491.0 q.s.ar. Tho oro,laota0 voluaa avallaolo at 20.0 o.s.i. is 6003.9 9.o.ar. c A Srar/c. PRCLUJa of lib P.6r. ® Da 1OQ3/IV4i NeAj 1t,4 ow d 7dr SA- 6J'M F4Airt,, z: 'r WI3e^MM . PRO_VENCHER b AE960CZATEE3 . 1240 No. JEFFERSON ST.. SUITE '0'. ANAHEIM. CA. 17141 632 -3653 4s =/ W FTLOW TEST GRAPH SHEET w Data OS -05 -1966 r Loca Locatld. SAPPNIRE !T. L— A RANCIYJ CVCAMONOA — 'J uric' Gw.Y, bo 0 —'•I 'r_' ' r r• O . J.V. �_. _1_ .. .,r y 6.0 ,�_ ..o TerrI2P4 VNPL CPAvto •a Wets..- blow GPM LETTER DESCRIPTION A a static Praaaura of 74.0 P.s.i. 6 a Raslnual Praasura of 66.0 V.S.L. at 1491.0 q.s.ar. Tho oro,laota0 voluaa avallaolo at 20.0 o.s.i. is 6003.9 9.o.ar. c A Srar/c. PRCLUJa of lib P.6r. ® Da 1OQ3/IV4i NeAj 1t,4 ow d 7dr SA- 6J'M F4Airt,, e0- . O:� uric' Gw.Y, r 0 —'•I �� .. .,r 6.0 2— r r y � ��•�� I ' = 1 0 6 1 I 2 to 6 0 111 111 600 1100 1300 ISO 750 900 1050 1Aeh Wets..- blow GPM LETTER DESCRIPTION A a static Praaaura of 74.0 P.s.i. 6 a Raslnual Praasura of 66.0 V.S.L. at 1491.0 q.s.ar. Tho oro,laota0 voluaa avallaolo at 20.0 o.s.i. is 6003.9 9.o.ar. c A Srar/c. PRCLUJa of lib P.6r. ® Da 1OQ3/IV4i NeAj 1t,4 ow d 7dr SA- 6J'M F4Airt,, 34C23EAFTO.. F'ROVEENCHOR b A%13E30r.'SA -rUO. TN=. xc =� 1240 N6. JEFFERSOV ST . SUITE 'O'. ANAHEIM. CA. (7141 632 -3633 ' PLOW' TEST MR^, FPH 3HL''ET w N&ns - Date +8 -06 -1980 I. _,t tan 94apHfpR RT. L ORCHARD p•urw. rw..wrn♦ f. • I #L: w 80 16 0— n 'TTT+'^r'*RrmrltrTTOTmr \ - 6tl 0� e ----� L— � 4tl Hli -i- FJ I 4< o f I I I ! I 3•.0. 28 0 24 20.0 C l6 l2 0 I B 4.0 0 $111713 1711 2000 3300 14000 4600 6000 4. •. 2100 3000 Wrt�r Ml=w QRM LETTER DESChIPTION A • Static Pressure cf 74.0 u. •. 1. t • Rssldual Pressure of 60.0 p.s.L. at 1491.0 9.9.m. C • R•aldusl Pressure of 20.0 *.s.1. at 4003.0 O.O.M. 6 ML W...... 4k ,,C6 MON" CCUNTYWATCR CIS"IC7 •'.►.C. BOX 035 CO)CAMONGA. GAUP. 91730.0835 • 17117 087- a t, d The area in,question, , namely'Orchard Street, between Sapphire and Jasper and the south side•of Hillside between Sapphire and'Jasper • was developed as a custom lot 'subdivision In 1964# and contained 3 38 lots. At that time the developer was required, -co install an 80 water main in Hillside from Carnelian to Sapphire in order to provide water service to his development. Static water pressure computed at that time was to be 43 to 45 p,s,i, based 'upon the control elevation at Reservoir number 5 and the 20001 contour elevation existing at Billside and Sapphire. • E -9- j 1 IT e• i C � >� rc i�.`�✓Si' . s �VJ•'.`?P�w i (.X�r4CH + . •. . 4 a. •e -.s °e o zX �� h= �i;g cos ca °� i r. i q � �7 N A 3 fS 9 m I ys��dsop - L •. - -I -- T e fS 9 gY;; d'�s,',i ti •.: P:a �_aa+.; r,L -'.'y S.Y' •.y�'- - 'tom _�'.�.w. 4,. '^ r r•'1- -'....+ CUCAMONGA COUNTY WA7xn OJ0 JCT •• P.O. BOX 030 • CUCAMONGA. CA119. 917000030 • 9714) 907.1791_ ^5 The developer installed a water system to confccm with the specifications of the Cucamonga County Water District, San Bernardino County Health Department and the Alta Loma Pire Protection District. ,A copy of the subdivision map prepared in ' 1964 is attached for your use, also included is a schematic diagram of the area in question to graphically show how the water supply to the area has been altered since it's original con- struction in 1964. 1. Original water source for the area in question was one (1) 0.5 m.g. (million gallon), reservoir supplied through an 18' main from Pump Station No. 4. a. In turn, approximately 1/3 of the supply in Reservoir No. 5 was pumped to Reservoir No. 6. 2. A 12' main was constructed in Hillside Road to service zone 5 west to Carnelian street. 3. In 1964 an 8' main was installed i.1 Hillside Road from Carnelian Street west to Sapphire and served the Tract No. 7176 a. After 1964, all development that took place along the south side of Hillside Road was supplied from that 8' main b Included in that increased demand upon the system was the development of Heritage Park in 1987. The pressure recording charts revealed that the dramatic drop in 0 -10- C �i� �s-�,'� - r .ar -f 4 1'� •'^:xl:. . .'w.i "r•,wdl. ...r t.,5+'." - 'M•- �f3�_�,..vti� 511 f UCAMONOA COUN WATER DISTRICT • I.O. BOX 030 • CUCAMONOA. CAli1. 91730-0630 • 47141 00],100- TY . i, pressure in the area of Orchard Street coincided with the daily irrigation at Heritage Park. To test this theory District's staff arranged with the City's staff to turn , oft the sprinkling system at Heritage Pack for one day's p irrigation. When that was done it was found 'that -the pressure in the area of Orchard Street was maintained evenly for 24 hours, and did not experience a drop until + , the next irrigation cycle. �3F^" C. To a lessor degree, the 'Floyd Stork School creates a r, ,., similar ptobleml however, because the school is fed from other than the main on Hillside Road, the effect is not as great. i 4. In 1976 a new 2.5 m.g. Reservoir No. 5A, was constructed to S receive gravity water from Cucamonga Canyon and service the bottom half of pressure zone 6 through a pressure regulator and the top portion of zone 5, (again through a pressure ' regulator and an 18' main constructed in 1978, connecting existing mains in both Turquoise and in Sapphire), when the canyon water supply was adequate. 5 In 1978, 1 m.g. Reservoirs were built at both stations 5 and 6, tripling the storage capacity of those stations and Droviding greater capacity for fire s ession. I. In 1984 a new 24' transmission ..ain was installed in Cucamonga Canyon, connecting that canyon's source to Reservoir SA, making that source note reliable. 1W -11- : r :_�- of�it'i.,� �,k;€�ree n.- -..- 'i"^^ia 9..,t�C,ewf•.;syb t: ti _ � '.° _ :�Y•- Ilk CUCAMONGA COUNTY Y /AT R DISTRICT • P.O. BOX 636 • CUCAMONGA. CAUf. 91730063E • t7t4j 9874991 " a 7. Jrst completed in September of 1988 is a new 160 main along 5 the top end of zone 6 from the reservoir to Turquoise Street rs along Almond, previous to this, no zone 6 main was in place west of Sapphire. This allows zone 6 water to be transmitted to existing zone 6 mains in Turquoise. ' a. In addition to the above, the new 16' main also allows us 7, to connect to the 5A Reservoir through an altitude valve. 4 this valve will allow us to maintain a pre - determined Yr level in the reservoir. By transmitting water from x' Reservoir No. 6 to Reservoir No, SA when the volume of water in the Cucamonga Canyon is not sufficient to ' maintain a pre- determined water level In the Reservoir ( No. SA, In turn, we will be able to maintain a more positive flow from Reservoir SA, down. Turquoise, through the 18' main and over to Sapphire. b. At present, we feel that tnis altitude valve will be in place sometime between December 1988 and January 1989. At the present time we are continuing with Lhe daily monitoring of the water pressure into the Orchard Street area and those residents are being kept aware of our work. It should be noted that at present, pressure is being maintained aL approximately 50 p.s.i which is 7 p.s.f, greater than the original design for the area, plus fire flows are being maintained that exceed the present minimum requirements as set forth by the Foothill Fire protection District. -12- 51CUCAMONGA COUNTY, WATER DISTRICT:• P.O. COX a30 • CUCAMONGA. CALIF 917�38 • 17141987-259t dip' Pinallyl attached - for "your use is a map of our District showing the location' of each' of our pressure zones and their '.:espective reservoirs, a cross receion of the same pressure zones depicting the elevation differential _between the bottom of the District and the uppermost part of the District plus a copy of several-of the pressure recording ckarts from the Orchard Street area made, in 1987 and 1988. LI a -13- • goo0 — VICO — 27� — Woo — %50o - 2400 - 2300 - 11,00 - Z 21o0 GCVO 1 0100 - Q I Coo - 1700 -� I&00 - �eco - 1400 — 13� - I2CO _ 1100 - I coo - 9 eat tr., p06 Guc~tjak CouNTY wkex Ji5t W -r P�r�uFS 17wrereNru.us DeTweeN THe Tap PNO 150TTrm CP rbc ZCNe 1 M At Om li of %CMS �N Inc O N a M uo r Zs ' 11 :once Itjw 6 °D lin -777 r 530 40 PRE55 URE In P-51 (rre3eune rex oqujt<e wu+) "&UVA 5 ■ m If ] i I wl I rP- V-V NOOH. . . . . . . . . . Ir 11 Cb NOW zl Re ^ OSHA Do WO UA MEN gov IW mmm NOR S'amwm la- S%JHDAY 4 Rg, a.., aS 3 y, 1-11], V m --. Aj MY, dip ro - .e // �'.• ' � _ _ �_ _ ' -�. a.� A .• >E,x ire.,., .�.: V, IV MEMO WN MaN, mo Ag S = Evo Nis ell WIN Eft L NO 'M Ai QFAFAI VIVO, tea: m; Er-I ,;4 I Mr I b trl y- E ;a M, Jas" El jC yj ya i. �-.■ Ell � i' v ��t�W:t"'. cw �. ��.4yd., ��r`yLf Via! Y,s _ - ._. i,�?t� �� ` .- .:�.�y,# `y� .. - .. ,• j� ��. -\ i 1 1 J 11 l ' �� R, LA I b