The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1979/08/08 - Agenda Packet4 . O • � 1 i .a'a.: s. •. �.''♦ \ .� tai. ♦ Y.. •',: �s .��Lli. «t.JY.aea.Lla.wi.�..ni. Ala. �tY�.. 4u4t`4.:.a >•i.4�a...a.:4.:{,.1. Il.: ✓��i -. a.� .' I•• ., 1 1 I• 1• L i l 1 {I � u 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING,CCHMISSION AGENDA, Wediii Asy, ust'87'1979. 7:00, p.m. Caruellgn.-Eletrientaiy School ifult,ipurpose Room 7105 Carnelian, Rancho Cucmlonga, Ca. I. Pledge of Allegiance. II. Roll Cal Commissioner 7Dahl .... ... Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Garcia CDmmissioner' Tolstoy Commissioner.Jones. APProvdi of Minutes July 16, 1979 Special Study Sessi-)n July 25, 1979 Regular Meeting' IV. Consent calendar 6� A . NEGATIVE DECLARATION WnR WfurrTOR REVIEW NO. 79-45 wILCOX The development of a '.light Industrial complex to be located on the northwest corner of Hellman and.' 7th street. VT. Public Hearings SITE APPROVAL Nil- 79 -16 QATV 71 The addition of tour temporary trailers to be! x-uTed for classrooms at Willows School located at 89ES Archibald.. C. GENERAL PLAN -AMEN*ENT NO. 79-Ol -E w CITY OF RANCHO 7— MCAMONGA :: A rejZTest for ai chatige in•the present designation- of high density residential to low, dJ density residential for property located on the south side of 19th'Street between 'Archibald and Amethyst Avenues, Vii. Old Business. VIII. New Bus"ess IX coancil Referral' X.- irector.. a: Reports. � Q ? Y 3M A1tt13H� R "Ns fr L.._•Y I �rvti � 3Atl b31S3 '� w .. ^•ur,urr _ 3rd 11fi16Y MY 101�lvv • W • ` pp f J :• • li r FMwa r am arvnn > �w .. be •N it Noun .�•r I 3 � �•i d Y � lr { 3fIb3AY 01'S�f17 1 i ACTION No Act ion Taken Y Approved 3 -0 -2 with change Approved 3 -0 -2 Approved 3-0 -2 Fr. ''Approved 3-0 -2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING' COMMISSION AGENDA Wednesday, August 8, 1979, 7:00 p.m. Carnelian Elementary School Multipurpose Room 7105 Carnelian, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl " " X Commissioner Rempel Excused Commissioner Garcia Excused Commissioner Tolatoy X Commissioner Jones X III. Approval of Minutes July 16, 1979 Special Study Session July 250 1979 Regular Meeting IV. Consent Calendar A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -45 WITGOX The development of alight industrial compl to be located on the northwest corner of Hellman and 7th Street. VI. Public Hearings B. SITE APPROVAL NO. 79 -16 SALTER - The addition of four temporary trailers to be used for classrooms at Willows School located at 8968 Archibald. C. GENERAL PLAN AMENMENT NU. /Y—Ull - f:l' iv LI VC tcn CUCAMONGA - A request for a change in the prey designation of high density residential to low density residential for property located on the south side of 19th Street. between Archibald and Amethyst Avenues. VII, Old Business VIII. New Business T.X. Council Referral T X. Director's Reports .yea .•. :y -. 1 {: k4N ��.. 1{I}(`1 �if�yl •.Y \fyYI4V�.. M�.r -�•-� A .vJ 1.�. Ir�{'f..11Y J�M�. J� .�, �1•�A�i�f"Yn '.WG \4"^SKC �'S.`1 3 it G � ' � •, l ! � j� °1 Planning Ccmmission. Agenda ' ` r f �l Page 2 XI. Public Comment.- Anyone wishing to comment on any items not listed on the Agenda may do so at this time. r: l X31. Commission Comment XIII. Upcoming Agenda for August 22, 1979 1. Public Hearing - Growth Management Plan XIV. Adjournment - The Planning Co =ission has adopted Adminis- trative Regulations that set an 11:00_ p.m. adjournment time. -. If items go beyond that time, it shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. 7;'- 'Adjourned to Special Study Session concerning Growth Management on Thursday, August 16, 1979 at 4:00 p.m. in the Library Conference Room (Tentative). f.' 3 it G � ' � •, l ! � j� °1 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Camnission of the City of Rancho Cucauonga was held in the Carnelian Elementary School Multipurpose Room, 7105 Carnelian, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, July 25, 1979. Meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Rempel who led the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. �I. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Jorge Garcia, Laura Jones, Richard Dail, Herman Rem.pel ' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Peter Tolstoy (Excused) ALSO PRESENT: Jack Lam, o u e:20 pment; Barry Hogan, Senior Planner; ty o ul Rougeau, Assistant Civil Engineer; Michael Va , ate Planner; and '.fancy McAllister, Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES "; Upon motion by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Dahl and unani- mously carried, the minutes of June 27, 1979 were approved as submitted. G; Upon motion by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by, Commissioner Rempel and unanimously carried, the minutes of the July 2, 1979 adjourned meeting were approved as submitted. Upon motion by Commissioner Garcia, aeconaea oy Commissioner Hempel and unani- mously carried, the minutes of July 11, 1979 were approved as submitted. ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Jack Lam stated staff has been contacted by Oliver Helicopters concerning their Site Approval No. 79 -11 application under the public hearing section of the Agenda, notifying staff that they wish to withdraw their application. 2. .lack Lam stated the County /City Commissioners Steering Committee meeting has been scheduled for August 9',•1979 in Chino. Since the Chairman and Vice Chairman will be on vacation during this time, he asked that another member of the Commission be appointed to attend this meeting. Chairman Rempel appointed Laura Jones to represent the Cammission at this meeting. t CONSENT CALENDAR A motion was made by Commissioner Garc'la, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried to approve the following Conaent Calendar items: A. Negative Declaration for Director Review No. 79 -47 - Hugh Brooks B. Approval of Resolution Adopting Amendments to the Interim Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Elements of the Rnncho Cucamonga General Plan. C. Approval of Resolution denying General Plan Amendment No. 79 -01B. PUBLIC HEARINGS NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND SITE APPROVAL NO. 79 -11 -.OLIVER HELICOPTERS - The use of an existing building as a storage facility and the development of a heliport to be located on the northwest corner of Helms and Ninth Streets. Assessor's Parcel No. 209- 22 -12. Mr. Lam indicated due to the fact the applicant has requested that this item be withdrawn, r.o action is necessary. NEGATIVE DECLARATION AIM DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -16 - ALTA LOMA PROPERTIES The development of a 184 unit apartment complex on 6.6 acres located on the south side of 19th Street between Amethyst and Archibald Avenue. Assessor's Parcel-No. 202- 11 -19. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development stated the City Council, at its meeting of July 18, 1979 denied Zone Change No. 79 -01 changing the zoning from R -1 to R -3 for subject property. Therefore, staff recommends that Director Review No. 79 -16 be denie3 without prejudice. A motion was made by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by Commissiuner Jones to deny Director Review No. 79 -16 without prejudice. AYES: DAHL, JONES, GARCIA, RE4PEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: TOLSTOY Chairman Rempel requested that a General Plan Amendment changing the area from mwi1ti- family residential to single family residential be brought back to the Planning Commission at the next meeting. fix' Planning Commission Minutes -2- July 250 1979 b NWKrIVL DbULAKATLUN AM DLKLI:LUK KLVL6M NU. IV -4y - KANI.nU AOAU%,LALL.7 Request for the development of a Wendy's fast food restaurant and shop ings located on the north side of Foothill Blvd., west of Klusman. Michael Vairin, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. He indicated the Foothill Fire District has requested that the fol.lowitg condition be added to the Resolution if this project is conn�dercd for approval: Provide an approved automatic sprinkler system for the entire building (this would not apply to the Wendy's fast food restaurant; or provide access in accordance with Foothill Fire District Ordinance No. 1; or any other method acceptable by the Foothill Fire District. Staff would further recommend if substantial redesign occurs to the site plan, then a revised site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. Staff would recommend adoption of Resolution No. 79 -55 approving Site Approval No. 79 -49 subject to the inclusion of the above listed cooiitions. Staff would further recommend that a Negative Declaration be issued ft., the Site Apgtoval. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission of the staff. Commissioner Garcia asked if it would be necessary to adJ a condition to the Resolution that the shop building would not be allowed to contain tenants with food uses that require or desire seating as this would require additional parking which is unavailable on this 'site? Mr. Vairin reported it is not necessary to include this as a condition as this is an ordinance requirement. Any use would be reviewed by the Building Division and Planning Division prior to occupancy permit. Chairman Rempel asked for further clarification from the Fire Department in regard to access problems. Ben Mackall, representing the Foothill Fire District, reviewed this for the Commission. He stated there is only one access to the rear of the project. The fire code requires that the hose lines when extended one hundred feet should meet, otherwise additional mitigating factors need to be looked at to make it acceptable to fire regulations. Mr. Herb Horowitz, architect for the project, stated perhaps a corridor or some other type of solution could be reached which would be acceptable to the fire district and asked that they be allowed to review this further with the fire district. Mr. Vairin stated as indicated previously, if substantial redesign occurs to the site plan, then a revised plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division. Commissioner Garcia agreed this is a technical mattes that needs to be worked out with the architect and the fire department to come up with some sort of resolution rath -, than the Commission trying to indicate what type of fire provisions s>• uld be implemented. He anted in regard to the sign, he questioned whether the 7' high monument sign is necessary. Planning Commission Minutes -3- July 259 1979 Mr. Jeff DeArsi, representing r Of the sign which was or Wendy s Restaurant, distributed a revision mendation that a uniforminnxlY P °OpDaed. buildings. pro ram dey�' understand staffs' recom- of the sign ordinance r °PSnion the revised signed for meet signing for both Mr. Lam stated the cation of r, Problem with thn original-84n he plaza and the restaurant used ths Presented was the identify_ subject of Commission discussion in previous meeting Proposed a �e verbage which was a ordinances well as the sew proposal �e both within The original It is his o is thin the limitations size are more compatible than P ion the materials and colors imitations of the that two signs he new sign, The Commission is the original sign character gns are presented which of the signs would to decide, now of the design nt the center itself. meet more of the sign. DeAreihapetP�oinh from uld be Prepared to work with staff ai n. the sign, each of the signs cc.-i1d regarding the be incorporated into Mr. Greg Daniels, representing Rancho about the landscaping re it Associates, Insure that the hey qu ement within the drive 'stated he is concerned the visibility get of the landscaping ot area• He high want to y of the shop buildings ro�heoea not grow too high to block Chairman Rem , rear of the development. and the p� s_nted the -landscape plane are normallY reviewed by staff sea i Y rill �'rr with P ng to insure there ie applicant regard to the height of the laud_ block the•view of those sufficient landscaping but that it will not units. A motion was made by Commissioner Garcia and seconded b to aollow •ReaolutIon No. 79 -49 subject to the conditions the follow y Co®aisaioner Jones following additions: as listed, with 1• Provide an Approved (th automatic fire sprinkler system for the entire building (this wo�lil not apply to the s r restaurant); or provide access in accord Ordi ndy s fast food Foothill Fire District.l or with Foothill Fire r any other method ricceptable by the 2. If substantial redesign meeting the conditions occurs to the site plan as revised site of the Foothill Fir,a Dan ica resultaof ning Divisionplan shall be submitted l and District by the Plan - AYES; NONE ,JONES, DAHL, REMPEL NOES; NONE ABSENT: TOLSDDY Planning Commission Minutes -4- Jul 25 • July , 1979 i y 0 Appointment of Consultant Selection• Committee 9 Mr. Lam reported the Commission ..as received a copy of the RFP requesting proposals for the completiou of the City's General Plan. The Council has decided to create a committee to select the consultant. This committee is to be made up of two Council members, 2 Commission members and staff. The review process has been set for August 17th in the Library Conference Room. The City Council selected Councilman Mikels and Mayor Frost to serve on the committee, and they have also directed the Commission to select two of its members for the committee. A Motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Dahl and unanimously carried to select Chairman Rempel and Commissioner Tolatoy to serve on the committee. REPORT regarding Growth Management. Jack Lam stated last Monday, the Commission conducted a study sessicn to consider the proposed growth management plan which staff has worked on for the last several months. At the last meeting, comments were made concerning various provisions concerning the program and a letter has also been received from the S.I.A. which staff would like to review at this time. Staff has not prepared a complete revision to the plan at this time as it is felt it would be best to have some direction from the Commission regarding these items. He reviewed his report in detail for the Commmission and asked for comments concerning each of the items. day formal application periods. Commissioners Garcia and Dahl indicated they are in favor of the tri— annual review, as this will not conflict with General Plan Amendment hearing dates. Ken Willis, BIA, stated he would prefer a quar- terly system as some projects will be delayed if the cycle runs in four month increments. Delay would mean higher costs for projects. Commissioners Garcia and Jones voiced t:neir agreement as they lnoxcatea Lnere are approximately 2,700 units which were filed with the Ccunty and if extra points are given to all these projects it could cause numerous problems. Chairman Rempel and Dahl indicated they are not totally in agreement with this as it is their opinion some type of credit should be given to those which had previously filed. Ken Willis, BIA, stated it is also his opinion credit should be given to those previously filed with the City for fairness and equity, depending on financial commitments made to date. This would provide some relief from the problems created k.- the moratorium on development. Item #3 Master Planned Communities. Commissioner Garcia indicated he is in agreement to allowing additional points for Master Planned Communities as such projects enhance the planninp7 of the community and lead to better, projects. The other Commissioners agreed. Ken Willis, BIA, also indicated support of this item. Planning Commission Minutes Item A, Drainage Facilities /Street Circulat•Con. It was the consensus of the Commission and the BIA that the plan shoild be modified to allow point credit for building as well as widening the najor arterials and establish a point balance to give recognition to projects exhibiting no drainage or circulation problems or where all improvements are in. Item #5, "Buy In Points ". It was the concendus of the Commission and the BIA that the "buy in" points in the plan be deleted. Item U6, Design Quality. Commissioner Garcia stated the concept of design quality should be retained. The BIA indicated it is their understanding the Committee will be comprised of two Planning Commissioners and 1 Council - person. He asked that this be spelled out in the ordinance text. Item 07, Affordable Housing. Commissioner Dahl stated he would agree tthe point criteria for affordable housing be replaced by a bonus concept that would allow up to 20% additional units and planned development "PD" criteria as suggested by staff be de-i•eloped to assure that affordable housing be plan- ned with a project rather than as a project afterthought. Commissioner Garcia agreed with the staff recommendation. Ken Willis, BIA, stated they agree with much of what staff has brought up concerning affordable housing. The BIA supports staff's formula for owner- occupied homes. Under the renter - occupied units, Section 8 on a national level rates apartment rents below California standards and would ask that this section be amended to state fair market rent as defined by Section 8 of the Housing and Community Development Act plus 10%. He would like to go on record in support of affordable housing. Item p8, Fire _Protection Criteria. It was the consensus of the Commission and the BIA to support the staff recommendation to delete the one mandatory criteria and irse`t a new fire protection provision under the services category of the residential assessment system, giving more points to projects more readily served by fire protection services. Item 99, School Capacity. Commissioner Pahl indicated support of staff recommenda- tion. Ken Willis, BIA, stated one of the problems that they would foresee is what they would consider the hightened possibility of speculation in the market. It is his opinion this is contrary to affordable housing. They would like to have a system which applies pressure. He suggested that we allow them to go through the process of submitting a tentative tract to the city with the condition that there is sufficient capacity for sewer, water and schools prior to the acceptance of the final map. Chairman Rempel agreed with Mr. Willis's suggestion. Commissioner Garcia stated it is his opinion further study is needed regarding this item. It was the consensus of the Commission that the public hearing concerning the Growth Management Plan be set for August 22, 1979; however, prior to that date, another study session be held on either August 14 or August 16 for further review or the plan prior to the public hearing. This date will be established at the August 8, 1979 Planning Commission meeting. it ik 0 0 REPORT reparding, Park Tax Credit for Tract No. 9582 -1. Michael Vairin, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Staff recom- mends that the Commission recommend to the City Council that no Park Tax Credit be given to this development based upon the criteria set forth in Ordinance No. 8. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission of the staff. Commissioner Dahl asked if he understands correctly that the trail system within this development is maintained by a homeowner's association and the City does not maintain those trails. Mr. Vairin stated yes, it is the responsibility of the homeowner's associa- tion to maintain this area. The issue is whether or not the Commission feels credit should be given for bridle trails. If this credit is allowed, all other future residential developments with trails could be entitled to a similar credit. If credit is given for these types of restricted use open spaces, then it will significantly reduce the ability of the city to develop adequate park sites. Mr. Harold Zens, representing the Deer Creek Company, stated the homeowners association is responsible for the upkeep of all landscaping within this development as well as maintenance of the bridle trails. The City is not required to maintain any of these areas. It is his opinion by approving a partial park tax cr edit for this tract it will not lead many of the other developers within the city to request the same type of consideration, especially those that were in operation prior to the Deer Creek Developments. He requested that the Commission consider a partial credit be given for Tract 9582 -1. Chairman Rempel stated his understanding of the ordinance is that partial credit may be given where private open space for a park is developed for the purpose of the people in the development, not necessarily for the community as a whole. Mr. Lam stated the ordinance is subject to interpretation. Staff feels that the Deer Creek project is one of the best residential projects in this com- munity and is an asset to the City. However, it is his interpretation of the ordinance that when a developer provides recreational facilities that relieve the City of a partial obligation of providing park and recreational facilities (such as a private park and open space), a partial tax credit is justifiable. Commissioner Dahl stated this trail system is very unique from obher trail systems within the city. This trail system fronts onto the street and runs along the streets. This should be taken into consideration being that it is a unique situation. The ordinance as he sees it is to promote more open space and more recreational areas. He believes a partial credit should be considered for this tract. Mr. Doug Hone stated if any type of recreational use is developed within a project and maintained by a homeowners association it i9 his opinion it is providing the need for recreational facilities within the community and some type of credit should be given. i Planning Commission Minutes -7- July 25, 1979 Mr. Jeff Sceranka stated there are many different kinds of recreational Preferences. Parke are 'established: for people to use for many, kinds of uses. A recreational use for this area is horseback riding. If a facility provides a recreational use for its own people this should be considered- Commissioner Garcia stated a trail system is a very limited recreational use which might not interest all the people living in the tract. He 's concerned we may be setting a precident without proper justification. It is his opinion further study is needed prior to a decision being made on this item. A motion was made by Commissioner Rempel and seconded by Commissioner Jones to continue this itex to the September 12, 1979 meeting in order that a full Commission may be present to discuss this matter.' AYES: RENPEL, JONES, DAHL, GARCIA NOES: NONE ABSENT: TOLSTOY PUBLIC COMMENT Mr. Ken Willis stated a couple of cities which he is acquainted with have hired a consultant to prepare a Growth Management Plan and have spent a con- siderable amount of money doing so. The staff and the Commission deserves recognition for doing this in -house and saving thousands of dollars in tax payers money to prepare the Growth Management Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. COMMISSION COMMENT - Chairman Rempel stated a Committee needs to be appointed to the City/ County Oammiissioners Conference in Dovember. A motion was made by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commissioner Dahl to appoint Chairman Rempel to this committee. 14r. Hogan stated due to the fact the Chairman and Vice Chairman will not be present at the next regular meeting another member of the Commission should be appointed to Chair that meeting. A Motiou was made by Commissioner Jones, seconded by CommisstAner Garcia and unanimously carried to appoint Commissioner Tolstoy as Chairman for the next 'regular meeting of August 8, 1979. Neon motion by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Rempel and unani- mously carried, it was voted to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of Planning Commission Minutes -8- July 25, 1979 July 25, 1979.' Meati rig rn adjoued at 10,50 p.m. to the August 8, 1979 regular Planning Commission meeting. Res ectful y bmittedo JACK LAM, Director of Community Development q'I "fan Minutes —9— Planning 1.Cani CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: August 8, 1979 To: Planning Commission From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -45 - WILCOX - The development of light industrial complex to be located on the northwest corner of Hellman and 7th Street BACKGROUND: Mr. Wilcox is requesting approval for the development of a light industrial complex to be located on the northwest corner of 7th Street and Hellman Avenue (Exhibit "A "). The first phase of construction will entail th.e development of one building equalling 14,400 square feet. A total of nine industrial buildings will be built throughout the project on a phased basis. 43,800 square feet of building will be built within this phased development. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The site is on a gently sloping (2X) alluvial faa which is occupied by three residences and approximately 865 citrus trees. There are no large animals and few wild species except rodents, insects, and birds all native to the area. There are no significant cultural, his - torical, or scenic aspects on the property. Property to the north ?.s occupied by the General Telephone maintenance yard, property to the south east and west is vacant. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Attached is Part I of the Initial Study for this project. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and a field investigation. Upon completion of the Initial Study staff has found no significant adverse envirocmental impacts as a result of this project. RECOMMEMATION: After review of the Initial Study and site investigation, it is recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued for Director Reviec No. 79 -45 as there are no significant adverse impacts found as a result of this project. Resp ctfu ly submitted, r e or -' ., Community Development r JL:MV:m Attachmenta: Site Plan Initial Study, fart I t , I'M "A" i J� 1 t � i ITMA-"I i x. �I �I m! N 1 uw w �� a i.. � t '•Ii i r 1 � J GGCC i CITY Or RANCHO CUCMIONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and tape action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative DeclakI tion will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional, information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: _ Parcel Map No. 5325 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Wilcox & Lowrey 17744 Skypark Circle #275 Irvine, California 92714 (714) 557 -1095 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTD CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: George H. Mim Mack 214 South Euclid Ave., Ontario, California 91761 (714) 983 -0439 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.),I 8900 Hellman Ave., Lincho Cucamonga ~209 -151 -06,11 & 12 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE Ali-•-. FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITSa None . ity+ r,: .` 7'N r, PROJECT DESCRIPTION , DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Parcel Map to create 5 parcels from existing 3 Rilrrels tQ n oxide for continuation pf rCsidential sse and construction of an industrial park with industrial uses allowed in an MR zone. The owners of the existing houses are selling and planning to move when convenient then the houses will be rented until the property is developed industrial. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 9.63 acres; 3 existinq buildings of 1191, 2235 and 2900 square feet and proposed Phase I of 14,400 square feet and subsequent phases of 117,400 square feet. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , AN'tMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Thin aitg in . a_gently _alo 3nq. M) alluvial an Which is occupied property on -the east is also vacant and the property on the west is vacant. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? This project is phased, however, the entire project wil.t not have a j J - WILL THIS PROJEC?: =� YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration! 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) ": x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 865 citrus grove X 6. Create the need for usa or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: This project will provide ® for industrial uses which will add to the noise in the vicinity. This oroiect will eaui a some additional municic)al services such as police fire, etc. This project will remove an existing citrus grove. c IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in-the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the .facts, statements, and information presented are true.and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before ac, adequate evallation can be made by the .Development Review Committee. 0 V e x a:. Date: To: From' CITY OF. RANCHO. CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 8, 1979 Planning Comission Jack lam, Director of Community Development Subject: SITE APPROVAL NO. 79 -16 - SALYER - WILLOWS SCHOOL - Request to permit the installation for temporary classrooms for a period of two years to be located at 8968 Archibald Avenue for the existing Willows School BACKGROUND: As the Commission will recall, approximately one year ago approval was granted for the restoration of the old school located at 8968 Archibald Avenue for use as a private elementary school. Barbara Salyer has been operating the school under that original approval with great success. The school has arrived at the point of needing additional space. Therefore, they are requesting utilization of four temporary trailers for additional classrooms for a period of two years, at which time they propose to have additional permanent facilities completed. One trailer is 400 square feet and the other three are 576 square feet. The trailers are proposed to be located to the rear of the existing permanent buildings, adjacent to the fire access lane as indicated on Exhibit "A ". ANALYSIS: Each trailer is designed to a- commodate one class of approxi- mately 21 children and one teacher. Presently, the school employs 16 teachers. With the addition of the trailers there would be a total of 20 teachers. The school facility presently contains 52 parkin_ spaces. The zoning code presently requires one parking space for each staff, faculty member and employee of the school. The parking provided on the site is over and above code requirements and is adequate for the present facility and the proposed trailers. Attached to the report is a brochure from the trailer manufacturer which depicts typical trailer elevations. The trailers will be set on the appropriate foundations with skirting and will be attractive. The placement of the trailers are well behind the existing buildings and will not be visible from the street frontage. The trailers are being placed adjacent to an improved fire access lane for adequate fire protection. However, any other fire protection requirements that may be required by the Foothill Fire District must be met. The Zoning ordinance does permit the interim use of trailers for educational and religious purposes for a maximum two year period. The Commission, in the past, has approved similar requests with a maximum two year time limita- tion. Should the Commission approve the request with the maximum two year time period, it should be clearly stipulated that the trailers must be removed within that time and replaced with permanent buildings. Permanent buildings will require site plan review by the Planning Commission. Item "B" Site Approval No. 790 Staff "Report August S, 1979 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of-public hearing was published in the newspaper on July 27, 1979 and such notices were mailed to all property owners within 300' of subject property. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. _ RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 79 -57 approving Site Approval No. 79 -16 with findings and conditions listed in the Resolution. Respe tfully su fitted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:MV:nn Attachments: Location Map Site Plan Trailer Brochures Resolution No. 79 -57 s I F PD • yy�� l I • '• �:A�(FitpE�GA:4*"J'li�y "� .,:• i ,��r�,�r�, kis .0 3 1 j ,� !1 _ I -�i 1 N Q• Tl F 0, \ S Al r� Suit ... � � �O . •• } . �� \��\ �\ ,`'lam _ ". — � � ! ras+rs'•��i ..-.c. j \� '\t.'� \\ \\ .'c .may z 4• _ ._ _�._ � .. t �.. Y i �,.. � �tisF, a,---- 1 _ _15"'r 6Ulua1NG i �N.w.•� � - ��® j. .aR14_ 2 CAP'S Q tI: /"fix y_ ,• ', �23Abt� , yet4. 35111 �� q5 INN +r xr-Wwm- 50 u WIN � r ?viii. � 1 \ � ' =� '�'• ' \ • . • � o N z:�:.pttc�•�,s,ut` mss ,' qtr y. ':; _ •: "•� -.i ^� ± - � ro • ._ —• •+r.'ti-, =. '•y -' �, �•- ti1(iiY G. L.F.EKcE. }' -t.: �: = !'._. ^ - _:i+: t • ` :XiS1;G::'G11k'0.'ai}�QlTR7+P. •:, -To .P.6M4i H. y 137 Gr�1Y� /►1'ICON GSv. °[ -r vC: 3t= .p.t.z• .Yat1lK_ k +i.thr t1.N460.G6 TO 3ti� �F. •_]a "_Wr,TB¢:,.; ° =._ ... r RESOLUTION NO. 79 -57 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA14ONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING SITE APPROVAL NO. 79 -16 LOCATED AT 8968 ARCHIBALD WHEREAS, on July 20, 1979, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above described project; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 1979, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above described project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings 'have been made: 1. That the site is adequate in size and shape. 2. That the site has adequate access. 3. That the proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property. 4. That the proposed use is consistent with the pro- posed General Plan. 5. That the conditions listed in this report are necessary to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare.. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued on August 8, 1979. SECTION 3: That Site Approval No. 79 -16 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Conditions and requirements of the Foothill Fire District be complied with. 2. The placement of the trailers be in conformance with the approved site plan. 3. The trailers will be removed within 2 years from the date of this approval (August 8, 1951) . If permanent buildings are to be constructed, then appropriate city review shall begin well before the two year expiration date. 4. All building code requirements shall be complied with and necessary' building permits obtained from the City Building Division. ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Copomission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co=ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Co=is- sion held on the 8th day of August; 1979. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: CM114ISSIONERS: i F6 17 Date: To: From: Subject: CITY OF RAN STAFF August 8, 1979 Planning Commission' Jack Lam, Director of Ccamanity Development A request for a change in the present designation or nign density residential to low density residential for property located on the south side. of 19th Street between Archibald and Amethyst Avenues BACKGROUND: At the direction of the Planning Commission, the Planning Division staff has prepared a General Plan amendment to the Interim Land Use Element of the General Plan for 6.6 acres of land located on Pe outh side of 19th Street, approx ate y west o bald Avenue (Ex it . T proposed amendment will change the present designation of high density residential (15 -30 d.u. /acre) to low density residential (2 -3 d.u. /acre). As the Commission is aware, this amendment has been brought about by the circumstances surrounding a request for a high density residential zone change and subsequent development. Since the zone change wad denied by the Council, it is evident that the area is not acceptable for high density residential development. ANALYSIS: The subject property is bounded on. the east by single family residential development, on the west by single family residential develop- ment, on the south by a mobilehome development, and on the north by a single family r_sidence and vacant property. The proposed amendment would be compatible with surrounding uses and will logically bring together the existiug developments in the area. Staff has prepared the Initial Study (environmental assessment) for this amendment and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of the project. Part I of the Initial Study is attached for your review. Staff recommends.issuance of a Negative Declaration for this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended Resolution No. 79 -56 recommending 79 -01B. JACK fAM, Director of Community Development that the Planning Commission adopt adoption of General Plan Amendment No. JL:MVtmm Attachment: Location Hap Part I, Initial Study Resolution No. 79 -56 L Item "C" F., , _� .. ��. �'. ry � 1. t 11 r, _CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET -,To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted' to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of.this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a NOgative Declaration will be- filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project,. PROJECT TITLE: NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: BE LIST OTHER,PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STA F AND.' FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: J ti IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION. I hereby certify that the statements furnished_ above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my Rnowledge and belief., I further understand that additional Information,-day be required to be submitted before an adcquate evallation can be made by the Developrient Review Committee. Date I - �•� J Signatur WILT. T11TS PROJtCT: • YES NO. 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)'.. 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5: Remove any existing trees ?. How many? i 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above:x��(N, _ ti IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION. I hereby certify that the statements furnished_ above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my Rnowledge and belief., I further understand that additional Information,-day be required to be submitted before an adcquate evallation can be made by the Developrient Review Committee. Date I - �•� J Signatur ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: DESCRIBE THE•ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORKNTION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY . EXISTIN STRU��TTy•RE$ AND THEIR USE (ATTACHINIj SARY SHEETS): 1i" Wald SfI,LWiSY/mc�P_� �Y,I Irnsnll +ti,� Ll£PC Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a :erics- of cumulative actions, which although individux'ly small, may as a whole have significant environmental im,'act? I,YM a. x -2 :S RESOLUTION N0, 79 -56 1J RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 79 --01E TO THE INTERIM LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a duly adver- tised public hearing on August 8, 1979; and WHEREAS, comments were heard and considered both pro and con regarding the requested General Plan Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend the City Council approve the following amendment to the Interim Land Use Element of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan: SECTION 1: General Plan Amendment No. 79 -01E, amend the land use map for approximately 6.6 acres of land located on the south side of 19th Street, approximately 700' test of Archibald Avenue from high density residential (15 -30 units per acre) to low density residential (2 -5 dwelling units per acre). (Exhibit "A ") SECTION 2: The Planning Commission has reviewed the environmental assessment for this project and recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment No. 79 -01E. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1979. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SY: ecretary n I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August, 1979. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Ic E PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET -- To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 1] For all projects= equiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of.this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Studir. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be- filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO HE CONTAqtTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: ^ r- LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: /1 %/I11- !v' r r