The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1980/01/09 - Agenda Packet41� I1i1' 11' 4 i f . I I If . . I. I . I I. . i l , I .. . 0 1 , i ,, Ali, k 'k 1 j I I I . , I 1 I - 11 1 4 Y I k I k I kl 1 I If l k of If R 11 IP M if I ` r , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, AGENDA Widnanday, January 9, 1980, 7100 p.m. tdon'e Park Communiry Center +, 91.61 Dnaeline, Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. i� I. Fledge of Allegl -.nca II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl Coidminnionor Rempal Commissioner Garcia Cotanieeionar Tulatoy Commissioner .Tones 1I1. Approval of Minutes December 12, 1979 IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 5687 - EDWARD J. FFDUNIW - Dividing a parcel located at the northeast corner of Sets Line and Rochester Avenue into two parcels. Assessor's ?arcel,No. 227- 091 -38 D. NWATIVE DECLARATION gOR PARCEL MA's - DAVE LONG - Dividing a four acre lot into two, two -acre parcels located on tha northeast corner., of Summit and Etiwanda Avenue on the north side of Shasta Drive. Public Bearings VII. G ld Business C. DIRECTOR REVIEW N0. 79 =32 - PLUESS- STAUFER - Review of landscape and berming requirements for the limestone.- grinding and processing plant located on 80 acres of land in the M -2 zone on the north side of Sixth Strect. 1,20' ;pest of Rochester. VIII. New Business >, 1� D. APPEAL OF DIREMOR REVIEW 1:0. 79 -70 FOR DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENT COMPANY - Appeal by Ed Young of the minor , .,• i,'\��, site plan revision for the shopping center located on t!i''" the southeast corner of Base Line and Archibald. 1 Planning Cclmisalon Agenda January 9, 1980 Page 2 ` IX. Council Referral ✓�Y \ li, i;m NG ORDINANCE AMM ML'NT NO. 79-05 - C�'L1T OF ' \ RANDC_CUCAMONGA - An Ordinance establishing otandarde and review rracoduran for Planned Community Developments X. Director's Reports J F. STANDARD OONDITIONS I. Public Comment - Anyone wishing to comment on any itemn not. listed on the Agenda may do no atItais time. XII. Commission Comment XIII. Upcoming Agenda for January 23,. 19801 1. Zone Change No. 79"10 - City of Rancho Cucamonga 2. General Plan Amendment No. 80 -OIA - Lewis Development 3. General Plan Amendment No. 180-01D - Daon /Barton 4. Rural Roads )MV. Adjournment - The Planning Commission hoe adopted Adminiatru- tive Regulations that eat an 11100 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, it shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. Ci° � �`�` -• caw S � 1°AA- �r1 • r tom.' ' ,• �. /' s r , I» 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 11 DATE January 09, 1979 TO% Planning Commission F ROMt Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECTS NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO. 5607 - EDWARD FEDUNIW - Request to subdivide 22.92 acres of land into two parcels located on tho northeast corner of Rochester and Dana Lino. DACYGROUNDe Ito applicant is requesting approval for tl:o division of 22.92 acres of land into two parcolat 15.36 acres and the other of 7.56 acres for property located on the northeast corner of Rochester and Base Line (Exhibit "A"). The subject property is presently zoned M-1 and general planned for low density residential development. Parcel No. 1 is the site of an existing lumber yard. The applicants intention is to subdivide the existing lumbar facility from the rest of the property. This review in for environmental clearance of the parcel ® map only and does not constitute approval of either the parcel map or future development. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINGe Parcel No. 2 contains an existing wholesale lumber yard. Parcel No. 1 is presently variant and contains no significant vegetation and slopes in a southerly direction. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, Part I of the Initial Study, attached for your review, indicates no significant adverse environmental impacts upon the environment as a result of this project. Staff has completed a field investigation and Part II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse impacts upon the onvironment. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued for tentative Parcel Map No. 5687 based upon review of the Initial Study and the finding of no significant adverse impact on the environment as a result of thin project. . Raspe fully sub tted, `- �.�J { {'t /(.fir •� � . Jack Lath, Director of Community Development JL:MV:cd Attachments: Parcel Map Initia ?.Study, Part X ITEM "An t� . 0 tom•. co cA a c �5 e W� .K ji =Z 0 t 0 4 r .q N q4 MA6 LD f. N EA187, 20N1NG A -1 >Lti18•r1Na xo�unG : ai -1 GENERAL PLAN: LOW 11I81nt1171A �i �t �I , I 0 tom•. co cA a c �5 e W� .K ji =Z 0 t 0 4 r .q N q4 MA6 LD f. N EA187, 20N1NG A -1 >Lti18•r1Na xo�unG : ai -1 GENERAL PLAN: LOW 11I81nt1171A �i �t GL 11Ylt�l.GPL ON "NlGY il'SIZIWlAI bA �'( iV /•1�•i 4 �1 0 - �"• L -• -- err`\ \` El 00 —• X1'1 -- %r /� M1Y 1a4s —_• _ —�'- _ 1.a .. ...0 —.-- —`- —GA ,1•• GL 11Ylt�l.GPL ON "NlGY il'SIZIWlAI bA �'( iV /•1�•i 4 �1 0 - �"• L -• -- err`\ \` El „ I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM6GA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental T.s0000mont Review FOO: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental rev ew$ phmnnt form must be completed and submitted to the Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ton (10) days before the public meeting at which time tho project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an dnvironmontal impact and an Environmental impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Parcel Map No. 5687 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Edward J. 6 Ellen E. Feduniw 8827 Hidden Farms Road Alta Loma CA 91701 51 77 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Gar T. Sanderson c/o Linville - Sanderson -Horn 6 Assoc., 9587 Arrow Route, Su to H, Ranch Cucamonga, WA V110U LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) At the northeast corner of Baseline and - Rochester Avenue, in the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga. Assessor Parcel No. 227- 091 -38 LIST OTHER P.�:RMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None OJ * T DUSCR P'PION E 0 DESCRIPTION OF PROTECT: Divide a• vr:, i /11 of the Southeast 1 /i4 of Section 3 Town u -..n., r, tinnt. in the C tv of Rancho Cucamong L ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED DUILDINGSt IF ANYS -- 22,92 Grose Acres �f ce u n , - Ex Existing Pole Sheds - 179220 Sq, Ft. + DESCRIBE THE I1MIRONM N—M-1 SnX 7 G OF THE' PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGPAPIiY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING i'ROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF' ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The north 7 -.6 acres of sits is fenced and improved for use T .._,.. A.. ..., nn1A nnntion is a I an a wncilesale J.unIuaa• u. �. -..- - -- - 11 o ico u1 ng, asp-ha par sevora re y ran s� A 1i nn,+rnl]] a Dole sheds,,t and served by a ral e southerly portion s opon f old with brush and no trees. The site 010-pi g t the uth a i i e 3 here e no structures on th s po ^t on There is a dry stream bed running north -South a1onA easter_1v o rt clf sgid narce].s. The use of surround n ro erties to the west north and cast s vacan _an roper y o a sou s a housing tract. - ct.1tochester Avenue ad scent to sa d T.P.M. 5687 s u y improve on a eas Mile. Baseline ex s 1119 m rovemen'c are a rox matel 80 feat north of. the actual -legal cen er ne ase ne, so, a center ne es gn o future s r'eet, per rcct o. 836 97 s 23 feet gout o re center 1 no. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series' of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may ar a whole have Significant environmental impact? NO ---- Ask WILY, TIi7s rnOJ sC X �,. create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ X 3. Create a substantial change in domand for municipal services (police, firs, water, Downs-no . etc.)" X �1. create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trooai now many? X 6. create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic subatances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any ES answers above: xMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential unite, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation.to the best. of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are tree and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development review Committee. ® Date NOV �y7T Signature Title LS A-45-7 ,F. . ----- 10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF •REPORT fa DATE January 90 1979 TO% Planning Communion FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECT NEGATIVE DECLARATION rOR TENTATIVE" PARCEL MAP BY DAVID LANG - Dividing four acres of land located on the southwest corner of Summit and Emaot Avenue into dour one -acra lots. DACKGROUNDs The applicant is requesting approval to divide four acres of land 7.ocatod on the south side of Summit Avenue, east of Etiwanda Avenue into four one -acre residential lots (Exhibit "A ") . Since the residential moratorium has expired, four lot subdivisions are exempt from the Growth Managoment criteria and arc permitted to be processed. Tlsia review is for environmental clearance of tlso parcol map only and does not conistituto approval of either the parcel map or future development on the lots. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINGS Tha,sitc is presently vacant, generally flat and sloping in a southerly direction and contains eucalyptus windrows on the north property lino. Tho surrounding land'.usos are single family residential uses, vacant land and orchards. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISs part I of the Initial Study is attached for yorx review. Part II of the Initial Study which is the environmental checklist, has boon completed by staff in conjunction with a field investigation and has found no significant adverse onvrionmental impacts as a result of this project. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued for this parcel map based upon review of the Initial Study and the findings of no signifi- cant adverse impact on the environment. ;'. Respectfully suk'mitted, 6 JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:MVscd Attachmentrs Parcel Map Part 1, Initial Study p,. pti , p(W2C.El_. MAP C.IIY C)F RANCHO CuC- AIACPN(AA 14 6Ag01V17IC7n1 Of PA0.C6L Z Of PAQCdI, MAP NO 401-11 QSC.OV.OQD IN I100K 36 PA6( W cP PADC" MAPS ladi"D6 Or CAN &GUAROI,JO C0VQTV I CAUCORNIA NCAUCPM441L 1919 C10po.oCAN-C% 13x1 VI57A WINAACAI 0117;4 OvN44 Dom sNIP6iV 9B -WU i ".,I,�t �Aeul. ; Pllaca 1 --'� �• N Zr T 14 yu I _svrso•3i "C� •�• "-- u► .lo u- fILI-tia5 a g er r/".�'^�yw C�•W,�er C•Ower" tsr1,� pow4r; 50,41, "soon Ge, am I, 5 t ft, Gl.i+a0 C.. 1,4ph►,.', 6snevel Yal�►1..... l4oles A�x�e7t� Parcel 1�x s 1,0(1- Awo1 0 .N-,� / %b,30 11 %,lolc £ �e hn tu H�GUIwo i -c&ffm D ♦ c 70'em"l l" Ro lmoo La 11,44 x Q Q ' La'6L,lop T•Iy,1T' Fob'/1d 1 "Trop r w P.M,m► N�aq i ".,I,�t �Aeul. ; Pllaca 1 --'� �• N Zr T 14 yu I _svrso•3i "C� •�• "-- u► .lo u- fILI-tia5 a g er r/".�'^�yw C�•W,�er C•Ower" tsr1,� pow4r; 50,41, "soon Ge, am I, 5 t ft, Gl.i+a0 C.. 1,4ph►,.', 6snevel Yal�►1..... l4oles A�x�e7t� Parcel 1�x s 1,0(1- Awo1 0 .N-,� / %b,30 11 %,lolc £ �e hn tu H�GUIwo i -c&ffm D ♦ c 70'em"l l" Ro lmoo La 11,44 •r.Xp.n7 Q n s 99'36'2x," R•2G.Pp La'6L,lop T•Iy,1T' Fob'/1d 1 "Trop Pore 'ks l6kown d" QMavil" P.M,m► N�aq f, CITY OF IV.NCIlo cuwioNGA INITIAL STUDY TART I - PROJECT 111FORMATION SIiEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Aseor,omont Review Foot $70.00 For all pro jectu requiring environmental review, w hment form must, be completed and submitted to the Review Committeo through the dopartmont Whore the project application in made. Upon receipt of thin application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare part II of the Initial Study. The Devolopmont i(eview Conunittoo will meet and take action no later than ton (10) days before tho public meeting at Which tirn3 the project is to bo heard. The Committee will make one of throe datorminationn: 1) The project will have no onvironmental impact and a Negative Declaration willl . be filoci, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and nn Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied ® by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: PARCEL 1AP (WAIVER) APPL =CANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: nave Inng _ E e,ra blip'. CA �l t'13A NAME ADDRESS] TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING TIiIS PROCECT: DAaa LOO-4e, 7�7 - 2N1O a r: LGCATIO11 OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Southeast corner of Summit and Etivanda Aye on the_ r-Ui s1de o asa Urive LIST OTIiER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FL'DE:RAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Cucamonna 41 ttor Dist for inetall.ntinn of a lditnr line fir:;; X 5: Remove any existing tree81 How many? 10 + X 6. create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or oxplosivos? Mcplanation of any YES answers abovot Construction of required street improvements on the south side of umn t ave Will partially remove existing windrow r w IMPORTANTs If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evauuation can be made by the .Development Review Committee- Date b Date �� i O &ignatu I-.9 Title TloJEC r i NO 1. Crcr.La a substantial ghr)ngo in ground toontours? 2. Creato a cubstant•ial chango in oxieting noise or vibration! X 3. Creat�a a substantial chango in demand for __.. municipal sorvicaa (police, fire, water, sowage, oto.) °. 4. Creato changes in the existing zoning or general plan dooignations? X 5: Remove any existing tree81 How many? 10 + X 6. create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or oxplosivos? Mcplanation of any YES answers abovot Construction of required street improvements on the south side of umn t ave Will partially remove existing windrow r w IMPORTANTs If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evauuation can be made by the .Development Review Committee- Date b Date �� i O &ignatu I-.9 Title PROJECT DEFzCRxPTi'oN DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Split of a four acre lot into tWo 2acre parcels ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANYs no existing buildings DESCRIBE THE rMVI:20NMENPAL SETTING, OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCEVIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION 01' ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): on a south s e of Summit Ave Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series, of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant onvironmontal impact? 140 0 0 Dates Tot CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA Jattunry 9, 1900 Planning Commission OTAFF REPORT Prom: Jack Lam, Director of Community Davalopment 0 Subject: CONCEPIVAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW N0. 79 -32 - PLUESS- STAUPER FACILITY DACKC:ROUND: An tite Commission will recall, approval was granted for the development of Cite flueas- Staufar facility oil November 19, 1979. As a condition of that approval, the applicant woe required to provide landscape plans for the Commissional review and approval. Tito applicant mot with a sub- committee of the Planning Cotmniesion to review the concepts of such land - acaping. An a result of that meeting, the applicants have provided conceptual landscape plane for the Comsdosions' review. Decause of the nature of thin facility, it was imperative that significant dense landscaping and earth borming be utilized for Cite project to help mitigato wind erosion and aesthetic factors. ANALYSI9t The plane as submitted by the applicant, indicate 35' of mounded land- scaping across the entire front of the property along 6th Street; donna land- scaping along tite west property line, approximately 1$00' from 6th St;reot; dense landscaping and earth berms ranging 2' to 6' along the east property line north to the limits of the project site; and dense landscaping acr:ten the northern limits of tite site to the point of the railroad spur. The plant notarial proposed by the applicant includes evergreen pines, cypruos, and eucalyptus for screening. Other materials are used along the front of the property that provide a more enhanced landscaped design. The plane are available in the Planning Office and will be on dioplay at the meeting. Tile proposal submitted by tite applicant is basically in conformance with the wishes of the sub- committee of the Planning Commission. However, there are a couple of areas which have not addressed the full concern of that sub- committee. The first area in along Lhe west property line near the front of the property. Tito committee basically agreed that earth berming along the west property line was only needed at a depth of approximately 300' from 6th Street; however, the applicant does not indicate such mounding in this area. It is recommended that such mounding consistent with that mounding along the east property line be included at a depth of 300' along the west property line. Tile second area of concern in the northern limits of the project site. Tile earth berming as pro- posed by the applicant terminates at the east property line and does not extend across the northern limits of the project site. It was the concensus of the sub - committee that the mounding, at a minimum, extend across the northern limits of the site far enough west to screen the stock piling area. The applicant pro- poses dense landscaping in this area only. Therefore it is recommended that earth berms similar to those along the east property line be used along the northern limits of the project site as discussed by the sub - committee. IM "COT J r ' CITY OIL RANCHO CUCAMONGA I14ITIA14 STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION ATION SHEET R- To u completed feted W applicant For all projeotei requiring environmental review, thin nt form must be complotod and nubmitt.ed to the Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committoo will meet and take action no later than ton (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be hoard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negativo Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will Nava an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied ® by the applicant: giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: PARCEL ItAP WAIVER 'i APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEYrivMs HA,yp Inn" �z �, _—; e,&. NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHOUE OF PERSON TO HE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Dw.sa L0N1t 99- T'Z4-10 LOCATION S u OF corner PROJECT Summit and ADDRESS nda AND on ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 1'IUPLII S IuC V 1 .n u�uu u 1 .- LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Curarrpnaa� later nist for ina*allitinn of '+untpr line - Y —I Conceptual Landscape n - Director Itevlew No, 7 2 Jnnuary 9, 1900 Page 2 The applicant is also proposing to install trace along the main rondwny through the center of the project anti throughout the parking area near the front of the property. Additionally all. nrona that :invo been excavated or grubbed will be planLad with so:"P typo of ground cover. If the Conm:inaion approves those conceptunl landscape plane, than it in rncommanded that a detailed landscapo and irrigation plan be oubmitCed to the Plai.li::g Division for review of consistency with the approved conceptual plans. Tha need for thin is essential since the conceptual plan does not apncify such things an plant sico, numbers, details of planting, irrigated arena and methods of irrigation. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve the conceptual landscape piano no submitted by the applicant with the additional bormu an described within the Staff Report and require that detailed landscape and irrigation plans be submitted to r,:o Planning Division Staff far final review and approval prior to issuance of b.ilding parmita. Re ectfullly wbwitted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JI, :MV: nm 0 40 Dotal Tot Proms Subj act: 1 I CITY OF RANCUO,CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOIVf January 9, 1950 Planning Commission Jack Lsm, Director of Commmity Development E APP PAL OF DIRECTOR RLrV1BH NU. IV -/V — uayrnoariw anvru.a. o._. COMPANY - An appeal of the Director of Community Development on the approval of a site plan revision for a building located within the shopping center on the southeast corner of Base Line and Archibald gACKOROUND: Diversified Investment Company in the developer of tine Anpgol's/ Albertson Center located on the southeast corner of Dann Line and Archibald. Thin project was originally reviewed and approved by the County Planning Com- mincion. One of the buildings originally approved within tine center was to be located along the Base Line Avnnuo frontage at tho east property line, and was not constructed with the rest of tine center because the developer had not yet nettled on a tenant. Attached no Exhibit "A" is a copy of the approved County plan of the location of Chat building. Since the construction of the center, tine developer decided that by moving tine building easterly to within ton feet of the east property line, more parking could be added to the project and eliminate one access point. Thorefore, tine developer submitted a revised site plan to the Director for the revision which was approved by the Director. Attached is a copy of the approved site plan and conditions of approval as set forth by the Planning Division. Upon rendering said decision of approval by the Director, an Appeal of that decision wag received by the owner of the adjacent pre - school, Mr. Ed Young. His letter of appeal is attached for your review. Mr. Young contends that a block wall io needed between the now building and his property and that the original zone change granted by the County in September of 1977, required the construction of a block wall along this property line. In review of the zone change file end discussion with the applicant of that zone change, it was discovered that no such requirement was made. Attached is a copy of the minutes of the Board :+f Supervisors in which the zone change was approved. The appellant feels that a block wall should be constructed along this property line in order to provide necessary safety and well being of children within the pre - school play yard. Presently, there is a wood fence which separates the two properties. Since the fence was substantial, staff required that only dense landscaping be planted between the two facilities for aesthetics, safety, and buffering. Under the County zoning Ordinance, there are ni block wall between commercially zoned property ® such a requirement is a general practice since 9� provide a more substantial barrier between the provisions for requiring a and residential uses. However, block walls and planters usually two uses. ITEM "D" 1i Appeal of Director January 9, 1980 Page 2 Raw No. 79 -70 El Tire original approval of the building did not require a block wall, thareforo, tine applicant could build the original building as approved by the County and block not construct a wall. additional parkingandeliminate" the drive througli situati n,ithe a des revised building an approved by the County and not construct a block wall. ltowevor, since the now revised building provides additional parking and eliminates the drive through situation, the revised txtilding in more desirable. Since the applicant has agreed to planting dense - landscaping between the proposed building and the existing fence and the fact that Mr. Youngs property is a qunsi- co:,mmercial use ratttor titan residantial, the staff did not feel titers was �ustifirat'on for an additional block wall. There are several options available to the Commission. Ilia Comninafon could affirm tite Director's decision and find that this is a unique circumstance and would not: be setting a president for not requiring block walla for Clio development of stropping centers adjacent to residential development; and ttrt.t because of non - vehicle accana, the existing separation and required land- scaping that a wall would not add to the furttrur safety of either the shopping canter or the pro - school. Tiro other option available would be to require the block wallo if rl requirement for all soppingncenters adjacent rtouresidential 'zzones no matterd what the circumstance. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended th options available and decida whether decision of the Director of Community 79 -70. ctfully stbmitted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL :MV: nm Attactvnents: Exhibit "A ", Approved Approved revised plan Appeal letter at Cite Planning Commission consider the or not to affirm, reverse or modify the Development for Director Review No. ' County plan and letter County Zone Change approval L 0 7'.. November 30, 1979 DivaruiCiad investment 270 south Briatol, suite 201 Coats Moan, CA Attontiont Jack Tarr City Of ANCIAO . OCA MONGA RE, Minor Director Review No. 79 -70 - A toquast for revision to a previously approved plan for the construction of a 4,700 square foot building to be located wi.thin tho existing shopping center located on the sontheast corner of anuulina and Archibald. Gontlemon, ' Par your request, the Planning Division hag reviewed the plans for the rolocatioti of Building E within the above duacribed project. The request for approval of this revision has boon approved subject to the completion of the following itams: 1. That the tiled roof structure be continued along the entire cant elevation and wrap around the south elevation. 2. That additional bushes and landscaping are planted along the cant property line to create a dance landscaped bnffor area between the building and the property lino. 3. That necessary encroachment permits and approvals are obt%pined from the City Engineering Division for the closure of the most as porly driveway on Dane Line Road. This should be accomplished immediat y. 4. That all items are completed pricy to occupancy of cosh ,building. 4f Thin review is subject to appeal by any interested or affected party. The appeal period in 14 days from the date of thin letter. Therefore, permits cannot be issued until such appeal period has expired. we have transmitted two approved sets of the site plan and building elevation with corrections to the Building Division for your convenience. If you have any .questions or comments regarding this review, please do not hesitate to contact this oefico. sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIJVISION _ Michael Va1Yin Associate Planner MV:cc cot Building Division, Jerry Grant a... Ed Young, Kiddie Korner pnCT11FFII•p'nnv -m n.N.- ,In .ar..4 ..., .......... ...... .,.,.. ..n., 27-74' 19 t0 W ' a O ; � ..�_ ,rr ,6e.7, �) p 0 5p.` _ 13A . 1�� ` _• 26' 1e:7 f3.7' 25 018.7' �' TYP. '" _ r✓ 'y_. �.T7p lu ' .•. » 11 fn . + 6O• a !61.1 7 y� .,� RT v .�G Cosanlunloner Carcin ntnted lit nnnlya.ing tho project, he feels it in cotnpntible with tile 8011111 and objeetiven of the proposed Cmtornl 1'1,1110 and therefore Into no objections to the none change. There bell,,, no furtbur discussion, n Alotlon wan ntndn by Winnlnaloner Cnrcin, neconded by Couenlanioner Dahl slid unnnlntounly cnrrled to npprovc Resolution No. 70 -20 as nub - mitted,and tint title reeommendatlon be forwarded to the City Council. AYISS: CARCIA, DAIIL, JONES, T'OLSl'OY, M-11PHL N01;9: NONE AUSENTt NONE Site Atrprovnl No. 70 -03 - Ed Young- The development of n nursery /day care facility to be located nt 9017 Onooline - It -1. zone. Commissioner Oahl excused hlmnelf at title time all he stated he in it friend o the npplicaut. Michael Vnirin, planning Aoaintnut, reviewed the ntnfr report in detail. Engineering and planning Division Staffs have been uc -king with Mr. Young to improve his plan by providing street improvenents, more pnrking, and n ningle access. Staff line recom- mended reviniono to which the applicant lino agreed. lie indicated an there can be only 10 parking npneen provided on the nite, the facility must be limited to the cnre of forty children to meet pnrking requirements. Stnff recommends tint the Planning Cont- misniou, following the public hearing, approve the Site Approval based on the findings and conditions listed in Resolution No. 75 -30. Chairman Itempel asked for questions from the Commission to the staff. Mr. Vnirin stated Stnff would like to recuamtend tint Condition #16 be amended no follows: That any nigna be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to installation and all existing signs on and off site shall be removed. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the pool a -ea is fenced. Mr. Vairin stated yen, the south portion line n block wall and the other portions are enclosed by a G' grope stake wood fence which appeared to be nonclimbable from the outside. Conaniosioner Tolatoy naked if the proposed play yard fencing is proposed as a block wall or chain link fence. Mr. Vairin stated they are proposing to use the existing fencing which in presently wood. T7tc commercial center to tite west will be building it block wall and lie is planning o block wall for the southerly portion nt a later date. The yard will all be entirely fenced now but will not all be block wall until sometime in the future. Commissioner Carcin asked for an explanation from the Engineering Division regarding the street improvements. -4- Lloyd Ilubbn, City ISnglnycr, stated Unsellur In sue or our mnjor nrterinl streets, Rest of Archibnl.d It line been widened. 'I'hr develnlmnent of n nhopphil, center by OIvoralfled Development Company on the carrier of Archlbnld slid Ynneline will widen the street oil the south nldo to the master plan width. If no Improvements are made at the site in question, It will crente all inland. It In vital that thin situation is taken care or in order to prevent n hazardonn situation. Nornutl..ly, the upplicent would be required to I.ml rove the street. The applicant Indicated tltnL he can not stand the financial burden. If inrprovetnent in it condition he w1.1.1 drop hln application slid not do anything at this time. l.f that were the case, tho City would probably be forced to purchase the land for glint portion and provide the street lmprovementn with city fundn. Therefore, we liavn chosen to work out n comprominn with On applicant and the adjacent shopping center, whereby the coat of the rlrect improvements can be shared three ways. This will be subject to approval of the City Council. The alter - native in to have the applicant provide full improvements or modify nnoeuuntent to lonn him and pay back over n five year period. The way the condition is written In t1w Resolution requires the applicant to pnrtieip+tte in Lhe Improvemuntn, allow either item of assessment district or nitar.ing by the City. The nppll.cnnt cony wish to speak regnrding t1u.H issue. Mr. Young, npplicnnt, states he in quite happy with the presentation submitted to this point. Ile would like to request that tie pupll. limltntion be lnerenard to 48 Instead of 40 children required by the Planning 0iviolon. Ile does not feel they would have a parking problem because the majority of the people coming in do not stry for any length of time. There being no furt"r c6mmento from the nudlence, Chalrntnn Hempel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Garcia asked if the City Engineer line an estimate of the street improve- ment costs. Lloyd llubbs estimated $5,000 total for the street frontcYe. Commissioner To ?- s naked if the request to increase the number of children on the site would be op to the County Licensing Agency. Mr. Vairin stated the pennon staff. limited the facility to 40 children is because of parking ratio. If more chlldren were allowed, this would be in conflict with ordi- nance requirements for parking. Chairman Rempr_l stated he would not be in favor of allowing more children unless the parking is increased. City Attorney stated t.hnt to vary from the parking requlremeutn allowed by ordinance, it would take a Variance which would require another public hearing. After further discussion, n motion was made by Cotnninsloner Tolntoy, seconded by Com- missioner Garcia and unanimously carried to approve Resolution Ea. 78 -30 with the follow- ing additions and changes: 1. Engineering Condition 03 The property should not onto (lower) properties discharged. - ,tdd the word "water ". Tile condition should read: gather water by artificial means and discharge it in grentar concentration than would naturally be -5- 1. f 2. Amend Condition 1116 nn followpt Mint any algon be reviewed and approved by the Planning Divinlon prior' to. Innt.nllatioo and till exlnlIntl nigns on and u[L nits be removed. 7. Planning Division recmanundntion 1111 mnended nii lollownt . That the parking, lot Lnpruvemento nuch nn paving, striping, and 6" rained concrete curbn be inutnlled tit the Little of a,.reel jUijrovemcntit. The remaining) improvements ouch tin landscaping and exterior building, alevntluno shall be Installed by Navembt,r 8, 1979. AYI*,Si TOLOTOY, 0ARCIA9 JONES, RI-2111% NOESt NONIS ABSTAIN: DAHL ABSENT: NONE A A A * A PUBLIC REARING Accenn Policy, for Major and Secondary 1111thwnys - Initintud by honcho Cucamongn Plan- ning Commission. Jack Lna1 otnted the Chamber of Connnerce and B.I.A. has requested that thin item be continued to the Planning; Conin onion meeting of November 22, 1978 In order that they may have more time to review this item. A Motion wan made by Comminaloner Gnrcin, seconded by Cominisnionur Jones and unnni- mounly carried to continue the Access Policy for Major and Secondnry llighways to November 22, 1978. AYES: GARCIA, JONES, DAHL, TOLST(N, R121PEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE A * * A A Chairman Rempel called n recess at 8 :10 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m. * * * A * At this time, Chairman Hempel nuked that the Consent Calendar items be reviewed. There being no diSCU, ,;r i on the Consent Calendar items, a motion was made by Commis- sioner Tolatoy, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried to accept the Consent Calendar items tin presented. AYES: TOLSTOY, JONES, DAHL, GARCIA, RUIPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE -6- 0 ( n CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA STAFF, WORT. DATE January 09, 1900 TO: Planning Commission FROMI Jack Lam, Director of Community Dovolopmdnt I] SUBJECT: 7,ONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: NO. 79 -05 - CL'ry 0@' 1U1NC110 CUCAMONGA - An Ordinance establishing standards and review procedures for Planned Community Davloopmont AnSTRACT At the December 19 mooting of the City Council a question was raised as to the wording of Section 4G ragardiny dedication of other forms of access. Additionally, a question was raised as to the wording rogarding Planning Commission approval and City Council approval of plans. we have made the appropriate changes in the Ordinance attached. Specifically Section 2 D (1) Section 4G, Section 4K have been ammanded clarifying the language. The primary concern caf the City Council was Section 4G. i As the Commission will reea�l when this item wan before you there was some question ae to whether or not other means of access could receive consideration for dedication and count towards meeting the requirements of open apace or park dedication require- ments. At the time of the meeting a word change was made which, at closer review, did not really clarify the intent. The sentence has been reworded as follows: Consideration of other forme of access such an pedestrian ways, courts, plazas, driveways, horso trails, bike trails, or open parking lots offered for dedication may be made at the time of approval of the Development Plan and Text as a means of meeting requirements for open space or park dedication requirements. If the changes made coincide with the Commission's interpretation we racommond.that the Commission recommend approval of the changes in the Planned Community Ordinance to the City Council. spp�aQQc��ti }val Submitted, Jack Lam Director of Community Development JLscd Attachment: Ordinance #94 ., ITEM "E° I, ® ® AtA 60 ORDINANCE NO. 94 AN ORDINANCE 01: THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tic CITY OF RANCHO' CUCA14ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMEND - HENT NO. 79-05 ESTABLISHING STANDARDS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES 1`011 PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as folloi-ts: SECTION 1: Purposes: A. The Planned Community Zone is included in the Zoning regulations to achieve the following purposes. 1. To promote and protect the public health, safety, and welfare. 2. To implement the objectives and policies of the General Plan. 3. To safeguard and enhance environmental amenities and the quality of development. 4. To attain the physical, social, and economic advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly planned use of land resources. S. To lessen congestion and assure convenience of access; to secure safety from fire, flood, and other dangers; to provide for adequate light, air, sunlight, and open space; to promote and encourage conservation of scarce resources; to prevent overcrowding of land and undue concentration of population; to facilitate the creation of a convenient attractive, and harmonious community; to attain a desirable balance of residential and employment opportunities; and to expedite the provision of adequate and essential public services. 6. To facilitate development within the City in accordance with the General Plan by permitting greater flexibility and encouraging more creative and imaginative designs for major urban development projects subject to large - scale community planning. 7. To p remote more economical and efficient use of the land while providing a harmonious variety of housing choices and commercial and industrial activities, a high level of urban amenities, and preservation of natural and scenic qualities of open space. Y� /*f ,..� E Ordinance Ho, 94 Page 2 Ell D. To provide ,a process for initiation, review, and regulation of large-scale comprehensively planned urban communities that affords the maximum flexibility to the developer within the context of an overall development program and specific, phased development plans coordinated with the provision of necessary public services and facilities. SECTION 2: General Requirements A. A Planned Community Zone shall include a minimum area of 300 contiguous acres, under single ownership or otherwise subject to unified planning, construction, and development by a person, corporation, or other entity; property owned by public utilities, local districts or local governments will not be counted toward the 300 acre minimum, but may be used as a connector of single ownership. B. A Planned Community Zone shall be established upon application of a property owner, in accordance with the procedure set forth in Section 61.0221 of the San Bernardino County Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and subject to the following provisions: 1. Submission of a Development Plan for consideration by the Planning Commission and approval of the City Council, pursuant to this ordinance. 2. Determination by the Council that the establishment of the zone and approval of the Development Plan shall: a. Provide for the development of a comprehensively — planned urban community within the zone that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations. b. Provide for development within the zone in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City. c. Provide for the construction, improvement, or. extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development ment with the zone. SECTION 3: Use Regulations A. Allowable uses in each Planned Community Zone shall be as established by a Development Plan Text approved by the City Council. The Development Plan Text may incorporate uses by reference to specific base zone provisions, or may establish specific use lists with definitinns pertaining thereto. I r Ordinance No. 94 Page 3 0 0 D. Existing uses within tho Planned Community Zone at the time minimum of its establishment'sha11 be deemed 'allowable and space requirement incorporated in the Development Plan, unless terminated discontinued, or changed pursuant to a specific time except as schedule incorporated in the Development Plan Text. C. Unless otherwise provided by the Development Plan Text, public utility facilities and publicly -owned facilities Permit, shall be allowable subject to a Conditional Use Permit. D. Unless otherwise provided by the Development Plan Text, accessory uses or facilities shall be subject to the same use regulation provisions as the principal use or facility. E. Unless specified as subject to a Conditional Use Permit, cin'simu. each allowable use in the Planned Community Z ,)ne shall be space requirement subject to Director Review. F. Nome Occupations pursuant to Ordinance No. 72 shall be except as allowable in each Planned Community. SECTION h: Site Development Regulations and Performance. Standards A. Planned Community Zone and all uses therein shall be Permit, designed and developed in a manner compatible with and Development Plan complementary to existing and potential development in the general vicinity of the zone. Site planning on the perimeter shall provide for the mutual protection of the zone and surrounding property from potential adverse influences. D. There shall be no minimum area, width, or depth requirement for individual lots, except as established by a Development Plan, a Conditional Us3 Permit, Director Review ov by Location and Development Plan. C. There shall be no minimum yard requirement for individual lots except as established by a Development Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Location and Development Plan, or by Director Review. L'J D. There shall be no minimum usable open space requirement for individual lots, except as established by a Development Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Location and Development Plan or by Director Review. E. There shall be no cin'simu. usable open space requirement for individual lots, except as established by a Development Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Location and Development Plan or by Di,,ector Review. L'J Ordinance No. 94 11ago 4 0 0 F. The maximum number of dwelling units within a Planned Community Zone shall not exceed the number (if units indicated by the General Plan for property within the zone designated for residential use by the General Plan, provided that the distribution of units within the zone and the maximum or minimum residential density on at," Individual site or within designated rortions of the zone shall be governed by the Devolopnent elan, Location and Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, or Director Review approval pursuant to the Devolopment Plan. G. All ublic strents within or abutting the development shall be dedicated and improved to City specifications for that partic,lar classification of street. Private streets within the development shall be permanently reserved and maintained for their intended propose by means acceptable to and enforceable by the City. Consideration of other forms of access, such as podestrian ways, courts, plazas, driveway's, hors trolls, bike trails, or open parking lots offered for dedication may be made at the time of the Develop- ment Plan and Text as a means of meeting requirements for open space or park dedication requirements. Ii. All development within a Planned Community Zone shall relate harmoniously to the topography of the site, shall make suitable provision for the preservation of water courses, drainage areas, wooded areas, rough terrain, and similar natural features, and shall otherwise be so designed inasmuch as possible, to use and retain natural features and amenities to the best advantage. I. Mechanical and electrical equipment, including air conditioners, antennas, pumps, treating or cooling or ventil.,ting equipment, exterior lighting, or similar equipment shall be located and operated in a manner so as not to unreasonably disturb the peace, quiet, and comfort of neighboring residents. Excluding roof - mounted solar collector panels and decorative exterior lighting, all such equipment and devices shall be screened from view from any abutting street, and shall not be located in a street yard. J. All areas for storage of maintenance equipment, and all service areas including refuse storage and collection facilities, shall be enclosed by a fence, wall, or landscape screen. K. All uses within a Planned Community Zone shall provide off - street parking and loading facilities pursuant to 61.0219(b) of the San Bernardino County Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The applicant may apply for and receive administrative relief from Section 61.0219(b) at the time of Development Plan Tentative consideration by the Planning Commission and approval by the Citv Council when verified proof has been submitted through specific examples of existing projects and /or expert testimony that supports reduced parking standards or stalls. a: Ordinance No, 94 Page 5 0 L. The proposed means for assuring continuing existence, maintenance and operation of the various common elements and facilities. , M. Additional site development regulations and performance stanglards applicable to individual uses or to designated r'ortions of a Planned Community Zonp may be established y the Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Location and Development Plan, or Director Reviaw approval pursuant to the Development Plan. SECTIOA 5: Pro - Application Procedure A. Prior to submitting an application for a Planned Community Zone, the applicant or prospective developer should hold preliminary consultations with the Director of Community Developmment and other City officials to obtain information and guidance before entering into binding commitments incurring substantial expense in tha preparation of plans, surveys and other data. Such preliminary consultations should be relative to a conceptual development plans which Includes, but is not limited to, the follow(ng: 1. Proposed land uses to be developed within the zone. 2. Development concepts to be employed. 3. Schematic maps, illustrative material, and narrative sufficient to describe the general relationships between land uses, and the intended desgin character and scale of principal features. 4. A preliminary time schedule for development, including quantitative data, such as population, housing units, lend use acreage, and other data sufficient to illustrate phasing of development and potential impact on public service requirements. D. Following initial preliminary consultations pursuant to this section, the Director may require submission of a competently prepared housing market analysis, demonstrating the need for housing by price range and number of dwelling units. Such analysis may be requested as a part of the pre - application review procedure, mey be made a requirement for submission of an application for a Planned Commuity Zone or may be requested as part of the environmental assessment or EIR. C. Following initial preliminary consultations pursuant to this section, the Director may require submission of a competently prepared commercial market analysis for any proposed shopping center of major commercial uses, showing the need for such uses in the location requested and the inadequacy of existing zoned sites to meet this need. The market analysis shall include, but not be limited to, the following: , 0 0 Ordinance No. 94 Page. G 0 1. Determination of potential trade area.' ,. 2. Estimates of existing and future population of tl►e trade area. 3. Determination of existing and potential effective buying power in the trade area. 4. netermination of tl►e not potential customer buying power for the proposed commercial development. Such analysis may be requested as a part of the pre- application review procedure, or may be made a requirement, for submission of an application for a Planned Community zone, or may be requested as part of the environmental assessment or, EIR. D. Following initial preliminary consultation pursuant to this section, the Director may require presentation of the conceptual developpment plan to the Planning Commission. Such presentation shall be for information purposes only, and shall be in addition to subsequent public review requirements pursuant to an % lication for a Planned Community Zone and submission of Development Plan. SECTION G: Develo►rnent Plan A. The Development Plan to be submitted with an application for a Planned Community Zone shall include the following: 1. A boundary survey map of the property and a calculation of the gross land area within the proposed zone. A tentative subdivision map may be substituted if the applicant proposes to subdivide the property. 2. A topographic map "and general grading concept plan with specific sections for sensitive areas, as determined by the Grading Committee for the property and adjacent land within 100 feet of the property, shown at contour intervals not to exceed 2 feet for natural slopes over 2% or less. For natural slopes over 2% contour interval shall not exceed. 5 feet. 3. Maps and supporting tabulations showing the current General Plan land use designation, the current zoning classification, and the current land use within the proposed zone and on adjacent sites within 300 feet. The location of structures and other significant improvements shall be shown. 4. A land use plan identifying areas within the proposed . zone and uses to be developed therein, supported by proposed or projected acreage, population housing and su h related lann� a d t' units, employment, development data as rector of �omnunq�y development may require. il ` ordinance No, 94 Page 7 5. A development plan indicating the general phasing or anticipated .schedule, indicating the total phasing of the Planned Community and areas to be doveloped in phases and the anticipated time schuduie for beginning of construction and for completion of each phase of development including a pro rata share of amanities, parks and open space. This is a generalized schedule and ma,y be adjusted according to market constraints as the Community develops. G. A circulation plan, showing existing and proposed public and private streets, pedostrianways, trials, and related transportation access or circulation features. required to serve the proposed development. The circulation plan shall be supported by schematic designs of principal traffic and circulation improvements, and such traffic engineering data as required by the director to demonstrate that existing and proposed facilities, both within and outside the zone, shall be adequate to serve land uses proposed by the Development Plan. 7 anticipated rrequirements and r proposed means of providing utility facilities and public services, including but not limited to, storm drainage, sewage disposal, water supply, parks and recreation, and school facilities. 8. An accompanying Development Plan Text setting forth the basic land use regulations, site development regulations and performance standards designed to govern each use area identified by the land use plan. The text need not incorporate the same level of detail as found in the regulations for base zones, but shall be as comprehensive as necessary to establish basic provisions and regulations which shall govern subsequent approval of apecific tracts or developments within the Planned Community Zone. The text shall include, but not be limited to, the following provisions: a. A listing of allowable uses within each use area, includinj such qualifying descriptions or definitions and requirements for Conditional Use Permits as onay to applicable. b. Maximum and minimum regulations, as appropriate governing residential density, site coverage, lot size and dimensions, yard requirements, usable open space, landscaping, and performance standards. _ i/es IliAllfl�� Ordinance No. 94 ' Page H c. Required yards, landscaping or other site development'reculations to be applicable adjacent to ot�er zones at the perimeter of the Planned Convnunity Zone. . d. Supplemental illustrations as required, establishing the basic architectural character and conrnunity environmental character and community environmental design qualities to be attainad throughout the Planned Community Zone and within particular portions of the zone. 9. Such other information, such as a topographic model in areas of excessive slope, may be required by the Director of Convnunity Development, the Planning Conunission, or the City Council to permit complete analysis and appraisal of the development, and to facilitate adoption of the Planned Community Zone and the Development Plan by the City Council. SECTION 7: Adoption of Zone and Development Plan A. An application for a Planned Community Zone and the Development Plan submitted with the application shalt be subject to review and approval in the same manner as prescribed in Section 61.0221 of the San Bernardino County Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamogna. B. Each Planned Community Zone established shall be indicated on the Zoning Map by the letter "PC" followed by a reference number identifying each separate zone. The Development Plan an modified and approved by the City Council, shall be considered to be a part of this ordinance,and shall be identified by reference to the corresponding designation of each specific Planned Community Zone on the Zoning Map. SECTION 8: Amendments to Development Plan A. A Development Plan may be amended in the same manner as provided by Section 61.0221 of the San eernardino County Code as adopted by Ordinance '17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a change of zone boundaries or for a change in the regulations applicable with a zone. Amendment of a Development Plan shall be subject to the same findings as prescribed for initial enactment of a Planned Convnunity Zone and adoption of the Development Plan applicable to the Planned Community Zone. B An me-'nent to a Development Plan may be initiated by the City Planning Corm,- :sion or the Council, or may be initiated by the original applicant for the Planned Community Zone or a successor thereto, provided s uch applicant or successor has, at the time of application for an amendment, a continuing controlling interest in development or managem of uses within the Planned Community Zone. Ordinance No. 94 Pago 9 0 SECTION 9: Review of Uovalopmunt Progress A. The Director of Community .Devoloinnent shall review each Planned PlamnningtCo�rnnissionuandyCitydCouncilscontaining��the following: 1. A sunmary of the development status within the zone and an assessment of progress during the year toward completion of development authorized by the Development Plan including adherence to development schedules and phasing. 2. A statement of any changes in land use and economic development trends, housing market indicators, commercial and industrial development rates, or programs for provision of public facilities and services which, in the opinion of the Director, vary significantly from those upon which the. Development Plan ware based, and which could affect adversely continued progress toward completion of development within the zone. D. A copy of the annual report of the Director shall be provided to the applicant and to such other interested parties or successors as deemed appropriate by the Director. Section 10: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk s a attest to the same, and tine City Clerk shall cause the some to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The D —ails R_e_�o_rtt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the 'ity -n a� California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 01940. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: -rft-y--CIZrk Mayor III 0 0 Date: Tot 0 CI1x OF RANC110 CUCAMOWA January 9, 1900 Planning Commission STAFF Rt'PORT rrom: Jack Lmm, Director of Community Development Subject: STANDARD CONDITJONS Ell Attached in a list of standard conditions which will be used in the review of development projects for the Department of Community Development. These standard conditions contain conditions from the Planning, Building and 'Engineering Divisions. Many times review of projects will entail the use of standard or typical conditions, therefore, thin tool is helpful in expediting review and completion of projects. In addition, standardized conditions enable the Commission to becomo fully aware of the types of conditions that can be adopted and also shown the applicant the types of conditions that could be imposed upon the project. 'These conditions .rill also be helpful in terms of typing reports and gathering conditions from the other Divisions within the Department. In the future, Staff Reports to the Planning Commission will include a Revolution listing the findings for the approval of the project and any special conditions relative to the project and a list of standard conditions will be attached indi- cating recommended conditions to be imposed upon the prcjoet. Upon completion of review of the project by the Planning Commission and adoption of the final Resolu- tion, the Planning Secretary will type a final Resolution including all conditions checked on the standard condition list and any other conditions that the Commis- sion might have added. This will definitely save time in terms of not having to retype Planning Commission Resolutions. If you have any questions on any of these conditions or suggestions, we would be happy to hear them and make appropriate changes. Rea)cctfu y ubmitted, O JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL :MV:nm Attachment: Standard Conditions ITEM "F11 DEPARTISENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subjects Applicants .. LocaLionl Those items chocked ara conditions of approval. APPLICANT SNALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONSt A. Sitc Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained heroin. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. _ 3. ipproval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of,Duilding Permit issuance. _ A. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sidayard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standarde. _ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidowalks aro required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall bn ancloued by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 7. If dwellings ova to be constructed in an aroa designated by the Foothill Fire District-6h6ei -ae "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. The developer shall integrate a variety of approved roof materials and colors into tho design of the residential development in a manner which is both compatible and complimentary among each of the residential units. 9. All roof apourtanancos, including air corditionors, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Duildino Divisions. r 0 0 Parking and vehicular. Acneos 1. All Larking lot landscapad islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" Falk adjacent to parking atoll. _ 2. Parking lot lights shall be a maximum height of 121 from the finished grado of the parking surface and directed away from all property linas, adjacent streets and rosidoncos. �- 3. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. All two -way aislo widths shay.;. be a minimum of 24 foot wide. S. Emergency access thdil be provided , maintenanco free and clear, a minimum �~ of 24 fact t:•iao at all times dv•,ing comMruotion in accordance with roothill ris.: District requirements. I G. All parking spaces shall be double stripped with a minimum inside width of 9' -Du C. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved ` by the Planning Division prior to the iusuanco of building permits. _ 2. A Master. Plan of the Existing On -eito Trans nhall be provided to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits and prior to grading to determine which trees shall be retained. 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained whorevor possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 301. Dead, decaying or potentially do ngor•oun trees shall be approved for removal at the discrotion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Situ Trans. Those trees which are approved for removal shall be replaced on a troo - for -troo basis as provided by the Planning Division. _ 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior stroote. _ S. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, Shall be provided within the developments 20a -24" box or larger, 70 % -15 gallon, and 10e -5 gallon. _ G. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condi- tion, free from woods, trash, and debris. 0 I 0 D. !FLU 0 1. Any.nigan proposed for this development shall be designed in nonformanco with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review ,•nd approval by the Planning Dlviaion prior to installation of nuoh signs. — 2, A uniform sign program for this development shall be nubmittod to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. B. RecronL•ion 1. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchnoora of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot_, Tract _, on (date) , I have read the CC&R's and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual reciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed_ Purehnsee edid statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. F. Additional Approvals Required 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuenco of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to rc,;ordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance /Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of months) at which time the Planning Commission may add os delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. �+t gW APPLICAIrr SHALL COWACT THE BUILDING DIVISION Pon COMPLIANCE WITH THM yOLLOWIN0 CONDITIONS Oita Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Coda, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codas and ordinances in affect at the time of approval of thin project. 2. prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill.District:.Firo Chief that . watur supply for fire protection in available. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building pormit for a now rosidontial dwelling unite) or major addition to an existing unit (a), the applicant shall pay development face at the established rate. Such foes may include, but not be limited tot City Beautification Foe, Park Fee, Drainage Poo, avatems Dovolopment Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Case, and school foe. A. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a nuw ccuuearcial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development face at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited tot Nystems Development real Drainage Foe, Permit and Plan Checking fees. ® 5. Thin approval shall bpoumo null and void if building permits are not issued V for this project within one year from the data of project approval. G. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building offical. Existing structures _ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances r considering use, area and fins- resistiveness of oxisting buildings. 2. Existing building(e) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Pluunbing Coils. m WGrading Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uni'lorm Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. "r.E� ,r- 2. A ooils roport shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the Dtato of California to pot;form such work. 3. A goological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan chock. 4. Tito final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the planning, Engineering and building Divisions and shall bo completed prior to rocordation of the final oubdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENOINEBRING DIVIDION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONDt Dedieationo and Vehicular Aecoon 1. Dodications shall bo made by filial map of all interior street richtn- o+' -UPay and all necessary casements as, shown on the tentative map, 2. Dodication shall bo made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following otroots t additional foot on additional foot on additional foot on 3. Cornor property lino radius will be required per City standards. 4. All righto of vehicular ingress to and ogross from shall be dodicatod as follows t S. Reciprocal easomento shall, be provided onnuring aeeeos to all parcels over privato roads, driven, or parking areas. Street Improvements _ 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 0 0 0 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited tot STREET NAM CUM d (R)MR A.C. PVMT. a DL"- WALK DRIVE APPR. OTRELN' LIGHTS A. C., OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPU 01'11CR 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right—of-way, an encroach- ment permit and faun shall be obtained frot,4 the City Enginenr's office, in addition to any other permits required. 4. Street improvement plane approved by the City Enginoor and prepared by a Registerad Civil Enginoer shall be requirad, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an ancroachmon:: permit. S. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of thn City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing comrlation of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or Cie issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. G. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineur, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be inatallod par the requirements of the City Engineer. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsita drainage facilities required by the City Enginoar. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding ® under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the proviniune of that program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect: the structures by diverting sheet runoff to streets. ® 0 S. Tlio following north -south streets shall be donignod an major water carrying atroattl requiring a combination of spacial curb heights, commer- cial typo drive approaches# *rolled street connnotionn,,flood protection' walls, and /or landscaped earth borms and rolled driveways at property linot_ -------- r _ Utilities 1. All proposed utilities within tho project shall be installed undnrground including utilities along major arterials lass than 12 KV. _ 2. Utility easements shall be providud to the specification of the serving utility companion and the City Engineer. 3. Developer shall be responsible for tho relocation of existing public utilitien, as required. 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. S. Water and cower system piano shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of Lite Cucamonga County water District (CCWU), Foothill Fire District and the Env :Wonmontal Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from CCWD will be required prior to recordation. 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will bo subject to any requirements that may bo received from them. General Ro4uircments and Approvals 1, permits from other agencies will be required as follows' A. Caltrans for: B. County Dust Abatemont (required prior to issuance of a g_ading permit) C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Other: 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of incorporation of the llomoownocs Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. 1 .i 11 11 1, 1 11 , 1 , 1 1, Ali. i,; 1 I it ,1 its r '1 , 1 111 1 f 1'• Al. "y.41 4' OV 1I I1 .f 1 ' +'1ut'i + II +'S 11 NOT � �'t + �Y ,�.. l�9� 1 ' ".2 f y I ' ♦Jrr iA r . i 1 ' •1 !1 r "� 1 "1 I 1 ' VI 5 I f�' ll r., , n t 1 , o''I,'' it I {1'1 ' ' 1 1 ' 1( 44 loci Aw i I r�, � 10 h •1 , ,. 1 �r El tl' - ud r •- 1p 11 ; i I 4' C4 }y 1 F, 0 i MINJTES OF '1HE OOARU OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA rt To Tho Board conducts it public louring on the petition TEEM Tiyy oug au`r� and Xathienn (tuna and Andrew anR Casrl Davin roqucsting a chnnpo of mono from A -1 to C -2 for propt,rty itunort:lly locaitc:l on the notLthoast cornu,r of Archibald Avenue ana Dana Line in the Cucamonga area, Moti- fic:ltio :t as required has boon made by' u'blicati.an in the Cucamonga Titaos, a newspaper of gonural circulation and b7 mailing of noticuo to tnniling lint on file in the, bffiee of the Clerl.. ' DoputY Planning Director John Jaques presents the report of tho clarining Commission, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk, indicating the Commission found the Proposal consistent with this Chaffoy Area Cuz^mt+ *pity Canard Plan and recommended a change of Polio to C -2 -T. in reaponso to inquiry, Mr. Jaques states that thorn was no oppoa1. n pronentod at the Planning Commission to the proposal. On call of the Chairman no opposition, either in writing or oral,•ia presented to the reclaseification and the applicant, DIr. None, states ho concurs with staff recommendation. On motion by Supervisor Kamanaky, duly secondsd by Supervisor hammock and carried, the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts the recom onda- Wion of the Planning Commission and approves a change of zone to 2 -T for the subject parcel, subject to the following T standard: Prior to the issuance of any building permits for now structures, a Location and DavFalopment Plan shall be submitted for review and approvals the emphasis of re- view is to be on flood control measures, notbacka and landscaping. By the same motion, the Board of Supervisors directs the office of County Counsel to prepare in final form an ordinance to implement the app-"oved zone change, said ordinance being in accordance with that originally introduced by the Clerk at the time the hearing was scheduled; this is Ordinance 2188 which will become effective October 6, 1977. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the '- c,unty of San Bernardino, State of California, by the following vote: AYES: SUPER`JISORS: Mayfield, Kamansky, Hansborger, Hammock, NOES: ABSENT: SUPEP.VISOP,S : Mono Townsend SUPERVISORS: None (tec) C' STATE OF CALIFORNIA Allp", COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO sy, 1, LEONA RAPOPORT. Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Son Bwwrdino County, Colifornia hereby certify the forepointt to be a lull, true and correct CO PV of the record of the octiun mkun by Said Board of Su {rervisars, by vote of the members present, as the sarno appears in ilia Officinl Minutes of said Bead of iW meatina Lit