Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1981/06/10 - Agenda Packet\V U�g l• K � L C, V. C r l • 1 f 1 L 1� 1 � LA i$ \V U�g C, V. C V �i may m v+ OD -+• A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -20 GENERAL E PHONE COMPA Y GTE The propose 3,440 _ ft. addition to the existing telephone equipment building in the R -1 zone located at 6322 East Avenue• APN 225-181 - 25 L� V1• G. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 1981 -82 V1I, Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address. the Cemm_.sion from the public microphone by giving your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes, per individual for each project. OTY OF *P1 RANCHO GUCP.MONGA PI ANNING COMMISSION c AGENDA 1977 WEDNESDAY JUNE 10, 1981 7:00 P.M. LION'S PARK COhMUNITY CEMTER 9161 SASE LIRE,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance IL. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempei Commissioner King ~ Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Sceranka III. Approval of Minutes I'V. Announcements V. Consent Caiena ,.- �- � ----^- The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. if anyone has concern over any item, then it should be removed for di'scussi'on.' A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -20 GENERAL E PHONE COMPA Y GTE The propose 3,440 _ ft. addition to the existing telephone equipment building in the R -1 zone located at 6322 East Avenue• APN 225-181 - 25 L� V1• G. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 1981 -82 V1I, Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address. the Cemm_.sion from the public microphone by giving your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes, per individual for each project. ; Planning Commission Agenda -2- June 10, 1981 C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. -05 - SO H RN CALIFORNIA DISON COMPANY - iTie 6 9 development of an electrical distribution substation v 7 the northwest corner of .Archibald and Wilson Avenues APN 1061- 571 -04 vNnuuhlKU VCn1UKt - A VISLOm IOr . sunnivi,sion of z -u res of and into 6 single family, residential lots in the 11 -1 -8,500 zone, located west of Sapphire Street at the western terminus of Garden Ct. - APN 201- 201 -33 ENVIRONMENTAL - ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1'1663 P. - MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT P ON - iG W A total development of 413 townhouses onin J the R -2 zone, located on,the east side of.Arch•i•Sald, on the south side of Church, west side of Ramona - APN 1 77 0 - 341 -01, 1077 - 133 -08, and 1077 - 631 -03 F- ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6596 - A 11 R,_EQUIPME1T - An Industrial su divfsfon of 4,08 acres o a into 3 parcels within the M-2 zone located on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Lucas Ranch•' Road APN 210- 071 -40 " G. CONDI'TI'ONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -10 - VICTOR D. EASON Interim use of the business office located, at 9513 7 Business Center Drive, Suite J. for the roursquare Gospel in Rancho Cucamonga VIII. Old Business Ix. New Business I ;l ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIE14 NO. 1 - -11 DE SON - The development of a 17,860 sq. ft. � c�iVl professional office complex and a 4,050.sq. ft. restaurant building an 1.84 acres of land in the A -P zone located or, the west side of Archibald Avenue approximately 150 feet south of Devon Street - APN 208 - 801 -39 & 40 , Vf, ' � 1 '�.. 'xy Planning Commission Agenda -3- .Tune 10, 1481 �A ' / $f -OY.- PRAVER - The d,ve opment of a retail garden YVt�i/ center on 13 acres of land in the C -2 zone to be located 100 feet east of Helms on the south side of Foothill -- APN 208- 261 -0.43 & 044 X. Council deferrals XI. Director's Reports. ESTABLISH HEARING SCHEDULE FOR INDUSTRIAL PLAN t K. SELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VIDE - CHAIRMAN (ORAL ) , L ETIWANDA SPECUM PLAN 1 MI., Public Comments. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items•to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda_ XIII. Upcoming Agenda XIV. Adjournment The P.Iaru2ing Commission has adopted Administrative ,Regulations . that set an 21:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the CO=dssion. W Q. W VI • r 4 • h V . 4 u • •: 3W VONVn1113 Z 71 In m W •: ,'. a y. • „ j fn 3n7 L31O3M30tl iu yi ••�•��•�`• and N3vnvw CL i rs vu l� ` an'J n3nrH O 3n'' QIVOIH•lfltl lly Af r.11ll.1 t':.. z� .eat 1z7`' �i• •: T' OUV1.3111n i J J � ti u �W Q• W Y � N N m y,3nN3AV umna C.;fT1' OF RANCHO CUCAIWONGA PLANNING COMB I,SSION AGENDA NDA, .4 1977 WEDNESDAY JUNI: 10, 1981 7:00 P.M. LION'S PAP,K COMMUNITY CENTER §161 BASE LINE,.RANCi:O CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance 11. Ro ?l Call Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempei _ Commissioner King _ Commissioner Tolstoy _ Commissioner Sceranka 111. Approval of Minutes IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar The following consent .alendar items are expected to be routine and non- rontraversi'al. They will be acted upon by the Commissi'cn at one time without discussion. Tf anyone has concern over any item, then it should be removed for discussion. A, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -20 G NERAL• TELEPHONE COMPANY G E . -• T e prop=4 2,440 sq- fi. addition to the existing telephone equipment building in the R -1 zone located at E322 East Avenue - APN 225 -181- ~ 25 VI• B. CAPITAL I14PROVETIENTS PROGRAM 1981=82 VII, Public Hearings ,y. The following items are public hearings in which concerned Individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from 'the public microphone by giving ycur name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. tYr�' , c c. Planning Commission Agenda -2- June 10, 1981 C. ENVIRCNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT "0 �0�C.i - SO RN CALIFO NI 0 ON COMPANY nterim use of the business office located at 9513 deve opment of an electrical distri ution substation . Business.Center Drive, Suite J, for the Foursquare the northwest corner of Rrchibald and Wiisor, Avenues APN 1061. 571 -04 b• ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 1169.6 ' VANG— UVR VENTURE - A custom lot sutatliy�s o n of 2.0 IX. New Business acres or land into 6 single family, residential lots in �'- H. the R -1 -8,$00 zone, located west of Sapphire Street at the western terminus of Garden Ct. - APN 201- 201 -33 51-11 - DEASON - The development of a0 sq. ft. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11663 professt'anhl- office complex and a 4,050. sq, ft. A G D P, N RPJi2�TI `I -� townhouses on�0 acres in total development of 4i-s the R -2 zone, located on the east, side of Archibald, zone located or the west side of Archibald. Avenue on the south side of Church, west side of Ramona - APN y; approximately 150 feet south of Devon Street - APN 1077- 341 -01, 1077- 133 -08, and 1077- 631 -03 F- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6596 - { W"& R EQUIPMENT - An industrial subrSivision of 4.08 acres oi' and into 3 parcels within the M -2 zone �- located on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Lucas Ranch. Road - APN 210,071 -40 G. CONDITIONAL USS PERMIT NE. 81 -10.- VIGtUR U, tuaUn nterim use of the business office located at 9513 Business.Center Drive, Suite J, for the Foursquare Gospel in Rancho Cucamonga VIII. Old Business IX. New Business H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 51-11 - DEASON - The development of a0 sq. ft. professt'anhl- office complex and a 4,050. sq, ft. restaurant building an 1.84 acres of land in the A -P zone located or the west side of Archibald. Avenue approximately 150 feet south of Devon Street - APN 208- 801 -39 & 40 i "9 Planning Commission Agenda -3 June 10, 1981 i I. ENVIRONMENTAL ,SSESSSHENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW; -%,O. gT--Y/--7 -PRAVER - The development of a retaiISa�en center on 1.9 acres of land in the C-,2 zone t "p Be lbc-t26 100 feet easy. of Helms on the south side.of Foothill - APM 208- 2261 -043 & 044 X. Council Referrals XI. Director's Reports J. 1317ABLISH HEARIIA SCHEDULE FOR INDUSTRIAL PLAN K. SELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VICE- CHAIRMAN CORAL). L. ETIWANDA SPECI'FI'C PLAN M., Public Comments This is the time and place for tae general public to address the Commission. lie=s to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. XI1i. Upcoming Agenda Mr. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 P.m. adjournment time. Tf items go beyond that time, they shall be hoard on_'y with the consent of the Commi Sion. 0 CL ti 0 J W— LL N � w = W YI C G W t�Q � Z n m b n b 0 c - 0 3AV AtlU3Ma L 6J LL � N `t a Y. 1 1 aror ,•rWVmila 3Ad pK aFQ F �QQ •. it .� w 4 J J x 345 Y-w d T H w a9� O �'�2.✓ rrl }i: s F N ti 0 J W— LL N � w = W YI C G W t�Q � Z n m b n b 0 c - 0 3AV AtlU3Ma L 6J LL � N `t a Y. 1 1 aror ,•rWVmila 3Ad pK aFQ F �QQ •. it .� w 4 J J x 345 Y-w d T H w a9� O u s F N Q H �w P 6' LV; !' crry or RANCI-10 CLAWONIGA S`�-q F REP T 7W 1977 DATE: June 10, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Ccmmission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -20 - GENERAL TELE ii NE OMPAN GTE - T e propose x,440 square foot addition to existing telephone equipment building in the R -1 zone located at 6322 East Avenue - ARM 225- 181 -•25 ABSTRACT: The applicant has requested review and approval for the development of an addition to the existing telephone equipment building as described above. The project has completed the Development and Design Review process and is now before the Planning Commission to receive environmental clearance_. BACKGROUND: This review is for an environmental assessment to deter- mine any significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. The site and architer_tual design is not considered at this time unless it is related to environmental concerns. To de- termine significant adverse impacts, an Initial Study on environmental concerns has been prepared. Upon comp'ietion of that study, evidence would indicate either no significant impacts or the potential for significant impacts. If a determination of no signitic:ant impacts is nade based upon the Initial Study, then a Negative Declaration may be issued for the project. If significant impacts are found, then an Environmental Impact Report shall be r,quired to fully ana- lyze the impacts of the project. The detailed Site Plans and elevations will be reviewed and approved, with conditions, by the City Planner contingent upon approval of the Negative Declaration. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS. Part I of the Initial Study has been com- pleted by the applicant and is attached for your review and consid- eration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. It the Commission, concurs with such findings, then a Negative Declaration would be in order. ITEM A EA 0 Environmental Assessment /Development RevIlew 81 -20 June 10, 1981 Page Two RECOMMENDATION: based upon analysis of the Initial Study, it appears that the project will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment. If the Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Negative Declaration for the project would be in order. Resgectful.ly submitted, K. BKN:DC:jr Attachments: Part I Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit i [nit "Alt SIBIO l3C%l D11 fat Study - Location Map - Site Plan - Elevations - Conceptual Grading Plan E 11 0 11 CITY OF RANCHO CL'C:s:•IOSCA INITIAL STUDY ge PART I - PROJECT I:.'t^OM- 1ATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development - n Review Co-ittee through the department where the prc,,,ect application is made. Upon receipt of thin application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. T: a Development Review Co =inittee will. meat and take action no later than lien (10) days before the public meeting at vibich time the project is to b.c, 'heard. The Cornittee will make one of three dete=ainati -)ns: 1) The project will have no envirormtental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an envirorunental impact and an Environmental I=-nact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional infor-:ation report should be supz)lied by the applicant giving further infor.*aation concerning the proposed project. r PROJECT TITLE: General Telephone - Etiwanda Exchange - Building Addition APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TEL "EPHON E: General. Telephone Co. of California 100 Wilshire Blvd. , Santa Monica CA 90401 213) 51 -/7 MME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT 13 fond Calce77Fr:T.rR KTRVr.N PARRTSrr ARCHITECTS, 444 S. Westmoreland Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90020 (213)384 -4106 LOCF.TION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS ARD ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 6322 East Av. Rancho Cucamonga CA East 300 ft. of 225- 181 -25 LIST OTIIER PETU-sITS 1CCESSARM71 FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGE. ;CIES AND THE AGEC:CY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: AT)sroval by Planni.ns� Dept. of Rancho Cucamonga and Dept. of Building and SsJfet:v of Ran CIPI CIICam(1n S, :1. 1- PROJFC: 5rFCRIPTIO_V DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: E_tistinc one story 'f�pe I telephone 2ipment building is being exspanded t:o the north --nd west to additional telephone equipme nt. t e new construe con wl aia cn e existing with the glazed brick ar -. - •xvered panels continued on the east side facing Fa ^t Ave ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANy- '`E FOOTAGE OF EXISTING ;aM Existing Building Area 2 70$ S F. Area of site m 1.55 acres New Building Adaition Arra 3,440 S.F. DL'SCRIBE THE �-rAL c ^_Z"- Or TEn' PROJECT SITE T..1CCL'JD.T,SG INFOR*-Y�TICY OT TOPOGP41PHIZ, PLANTS (T ?,EES) , ANIN'hLS, ANY CULTUIV -yL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUATDINC PP.OPERTIr -S, A -D THE DESCRIPTIOiT OF AINTY EXISTING STRUCTURES A%-M TH IR USE (1'zTTAC14 ti:= :CESStiRY SHEETS) site is in a very ain and 'rows of t in their natural cuy..y cesluentlal area with gently s 0p—i g es dividing the land into modest sized fields tate. East Ave. is a two lane curbless asphalt tion that was widened when the original buiidin to the south of the building site is a one sto corral and open sheds in the rear or their property eland is undeveloped i.nunediatel.y surrounding the 'Is the project, part of a larger proje -t, one of a series Of cumulative actions, w:;ich although in'3ividually smal'_. may as a whole have significant enviror-nent -1 iraact? No I° Z. 0 WIM, TA PPO..!7CT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial. change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ X _ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)'. y X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X S Remove -any existing trees? Hcw many? X 6. create the need for use or disposal of potentially bazardovs materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: TMTFJ!Z' ANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief_ I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by Development Review Cosznit-tee. . / l /) Date may 8, 1981 Signature H=R-_.. . RALPH SNYDER, JR Title Assistant Seceetar i GENERA: TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA T-3 �, [ , �� r rY�'.' ,� /, ;.'�� ' •.� 1, 1 �Ir � 1 1 1 Al It :,i•, �; .ifs.;'. �•fi J "r�r1 r, ,1r 1 u��1 IIf• 'r1', ., M1,• tl� . I, I 1 .y,J'• I. •4,1 N�f1 Y .'fir, � • �: 1 1 .t . ' yr' !• NORTH 1. •. .,A CITY O S' • RANCHO C .' TITLE: "r / l �•/1� yh • rt ' \ t � „I '• ,� • I1 �J�I I , I I 1�1� II I I 1 I� �Y, I �1� ._ y •' ' •r ='.' r�.'.1 II I 'I '1l I II'�• r'p' •_ �� ' 1 y., n r � -i E E 0 a� FIR. 11 llN -/ I // 1 L�rL wp'. 1 Lwmr x. /Nsw AWITI9N 1 1 1 Gl1LL �MKC \ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO GA PLC *.NNING DWISION ou L*� ox H rtV 11 iTENI: 51 TITIJ': _ SI'"f RAW EkHll T.- a _SCALE -. —* �_. ryt�l�' �1 1 ci, n.. � Y. • 1 • � „ 1 '''�.�1� J. 1 �, ,.1� » 1. � •flirt, : , . � �ebii'. Pa' �AjLCRFii047f�" Y" nR. •!DF�4'1'n�AlliiGittA#I.tu�:see ..R tl1n��.n....�...- LL �, L,1 \' ri E I ypY' i ~,' j FE ._ ......... " T IiT I T I T It v mo=w Limp. CDLLLI. 1 eTLT I ; I ��L.1 aM1 �_�, MiGlO qV0 M191NC J S I 1 ww� � sy.•u bLVLWY 4 WtlwnlD AvC� L� V NORTH CITE' OF ITGN It ___ �-9� ° -co f� �'C,�� C�T �I�:�'GA TITLE C- r L). & l . � 4* ,, -� PLANNC \G DINILSION 1_.. \itlI31T: SCALE.._ "'" t. �.•1 l_ CITY OP RANCHO C ' MO`:C;A STAY r, REP RT DATE: June 10, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Capital Improvements Program 1981 -82 ri Attached for Planning Commission review and approval is t;ie 1981 -82 Capital Improvements budget and a revised Long Range Capital Improvements Study. The current Capital Plan is basically a continuation of last year's program into the current year. One exception is the proposed Base Line Widening which will be constructed as a cooperative project with the, condominium develop- ment on the northwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa. Also attached for your information is a copy of the road needs analysis recent- ly submitted to the City Council and an analysis memo on current legislation . being heard in the State Legislature. I will review at the meeting the long range needs with the Commission but will not be seeking approval of the proposed priority listings at this time. Ii the Commission wishes, Engineering would reschedule a more detailed analysis of the Capital Improvement needs for the future. RECOMMENDATION It is requested that the Commission adopt the attached resolution finding the proposed Capital Improvements P;-,)gram for 1981 -82 consistent with the General Plan and recommending approval to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, LBH: jaa Attachments ITEM B e RESOLUTION! NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHn CUCAMO;IGA PLANNING COt t•IISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF 1981 -82 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AND FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. Planning Commissionoheldea 27th eeting tc Cucamonga Capital improvements Program; and Proposed WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission concurs in the recommended program as proposed; and WHEREAS, the proposed program conforms to the Elements of the General Plan NOV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby: SECTION 1: Find that the attached Capital Improvement Program is in conformance with the General Plan of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 2: Recommends approval of the attached Capital Improvements Program for the 1981 -82 fiscal proposed Council of Rancho Cucamonga for its adoption, Year to the City APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THIS day of 1981. PLANNING CO;'IMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA BY: Ri6iard Dahl , Chairman' ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning C000nission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning COm0lissi0r, held on the 27th day of !•ta+�, to wi t: 1431, by the following vote, AYES: C0.'•C'.i5SIONERS: NOES: CCFit1ISS[OtlERS: ASSENT: C01'MISSIONERS: CA Total $1,538,249 0 a PROPOSED 1981 -82 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRMI AIL REVENUE SUI%2 ARY Gas Tax (2106, 2107) $232,458 SB 325 $305,101 Systems Development Funds $420,000 Federal Aid Urban Funds (Restricted) $340,000 Federal Grade Crossing Funds ( Restricted) $ 76,725 Community Block Grant Funds (Restricted) $163,965 Total Revenue $1,538,249 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 1. Vineyard. Avenue Widening & Signals Eighth Street to Arrow Route (FAU) $480,000 2. Phase 2 North Town Street Improvements r (CUBG) Reid, Feron and Main Streets $163,965 3. Deer Creek Bridges $258,241 4. Carnelian Street Realignment $400,000 5. Sapphire Street Reconstruction. $ 21,000 6. Archibald Reconstruction at Banyan and Highland $ 30,000 7. Demens Equestrian. Bridge $ 15,000 8. P.ase Line Widening (cooperative project with Developer) Hermosa East $140,000 9. t.ssessment District 79 -1 Design $ 30,043 Total $1,538,249 STORM DRAIN FUNDS ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE PROJECT SUMMARY 1. Design Assessment District 79 -1 (Loan 1 year) 2. Design Beryl - Redhill Storm Drain ?. Misc. Design and Planning Studies 4. Misc. Construction Drainage Facilities Sapphire @ Banyan - Extend Catch Basins 4th Street @ Archibald - Add Catch Basin Beryl @ 19th Street - Add Catch Basin and nuisance drain Total $601,364 $40,000 $ 501000 $ 50,000 $100,364 $601,365 El 13 !1! .9 CITY OF RANCI -10 1,110`:G,. smu 1A REP P IiT DATE: May 20; 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FL_'d: Lloyd B_ Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Status of Streets and Highway Needed Attached for Council review is the Proposed 1981 -82 Capital Improve ment Program and the Long Range Capital Program. The proposed bud- get for next year deals primarily with a continuation of previously initiated projects and restricted federally funded projects. The B,-,,;e Line Widening is proposed in anticipation of a cooperative project with the condominium development on the northwest corner of Base Line and He rnosa. if it appears that this project does not proceed within the year these funds could be diverted. The Long Range Capital needs have been completely re- established this year to insure a fresh evaluation of needs. This inventory has been segregated into four categories. Major Projects ° Arterial Resurfacing and Reconstruction ° Special Projects ° Traffic Signals All of these projects exclusive of grade separations and interch wort: are now needs that should be accomplished as quickly as pos The total needs are estimated at:approximately $7,500,000. Of this amount, the most sensitive areas for consideration are the arterial and local street resurfacing and reconstruction. These projects total approximately $2,000.000.00. All. of these projects are currently required and many have been deferred already for seve years. No funds are available this yt-4r to accomplish any of this work. As the Council is aware, the continued deferral of this maintenance will double and triple the cost of repairs and result in increased demand for routine surface patching from our maintena crews. e Assuming a 20 year reconstruction life on the current 220 mile sys- tem, the normal road maintenance budget should approach $1.3 million. Road maintenance is funded primarily through gas tax revenues and sales tax on gasoline. Gax ta:: is currently a set 7 cents per aallon Status of Streets and May 20, 1981 Page 2 Highways Needed and has been at that level. since 1963. In recent years, with increased fuel efficiency of the auto fleet, and the effects of construction inflation have resulted in dramatic decreases in the funds available for street maintenance and improvement. The attached table demonstrates these impacts. The total street budget available this year is broken down as follows: ° Gax Tax $424,193 ° SB 325 Sales Tax $556,804 TDA ° Systems Development $420,000 Total funds available are $1,400,997 The primary claim on these funds are the routine maintenance and administration which totals $525,716. The remaining $875,281 is assignable to projects. It should be pointed out that the City's routine maintenance service levels are at a minimum acceptable level. of service and are signifi- cantly below comparable Cities in tree trimming and street sweeping. Also, the Council should be aware that the estimated $420,000 in Systems Funds depends on a level of growth which substantially increases the current traffic hazards and management problems. If the growth levels are not normal, these funds could significantly decrease. From these figures it can be seen that the City is operating at a normal deficiency of $400,000 with addressing increased maintenance due to growth or accomplishing any major capital improvements. In summary, without a significant increase in revenues available for road maintenance and improvements, this City and all road departments throughout the State are facing a total deterioration of our streets and highways with the next 20 years. Rancho Cucamonga in all of this, is somewhat more fortunate than other Cities. Our Citv road system, because of recent growth, is relatively new and maintenance, tlierefore, somewhat lower than older Cities. Also, with our strong growth pattern, we are able to supplement traditional sources of funds through fee supports. No growth older Cities have neither of these advantages. lie will, however, lose this advantage each year as the responsibilities of development replace the opportunities and the City ages and becomes more stable. C C M., oLCLU-' U! �-creets anu Highways Deeded May 20, 1981 Page 3 RECOMMEDID`,T IONS The road problems outlined in this memo place before the City three challenges: 1. To fully consider road needs in the balance of municipal servi -es to provide the safest most coat effective system 'possible. 2. To consider fully the ongoing responsibilities of growth to the fiscal stability of the City and try to balance those responsibili.- ties with the opportunities. 3. To assist other agencies and policy boards in developing funds to equitably provide for the maintenance of our streets and highways. It is the third challenge that is currently being addressed by the Foran Bill (SB215), which was summarized in my April 1, 1981 memo to Council. This Bill which recently passed the Senate will add an insufficient but badly needed two cents to the gax tax along with other financial supplements. These changes would begin in 1983 and are broadly recognized to be only a holding action to arrest the deterioration of inflation. Further increases are needed now and will be needed in the future. To lend the City' full support to these efforts, it is recommended that the attached resolution be executed and transmitted to legislators. but beyond that the Council as individuals need to commit to educating the community to this problem to garner a broad based support to main- tain our transportation system. No action is required on the Capital Improvg6ents Program prior to approval by the Planning Commission. Respectfully submitted, a� I13T_-i:jaa Attachments P420RITY 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15, t, GONG ENGMEERING DIVISIOI RA.N;GE CAPITAL IZ'IPRCVW, TS PROJECT PI:IORITIE:S MAJOR PROJECT PRIORITY STREET T,TMTm; /nrSCRIPTIC -,q = '-_ =-- _______ c ESTIMATED OST Vine'-lard Avenue Eight St. tc^ Arrow Rte. (FAU) $420x000 Widening and Signals Carnelian Street Vineyard to Church Realign Curves $400,0()o Base Tine Road East and West of Hermosa $140,000 Widening and Reconstruction Hellman Avenue @ Foothill Blvd. Widening, Drainage and $350,000 Signals Grove Avenue Eighth to Foothill Widening, Signal Modifications f $762.500 Hellman Avenue Base Line to SPRR Widening and Drainage $327,200 I. =-son Avenue @ Alta Loma Channel $ Culvert Crossing 30,x000 Turner Avenue @ Foothil). Bled. $3GO,r Signals, Widening, Drainage Iler rosa Avenue @ SPRrZ Widening and Drainage $350,000 Hellman Avenue @ AT &SF RR Widening and Drainage $350,000 Turner Avenue @ AT&SF RR Widening and Drainage $330,000 Ramona Avenue @ SPRR Widening and Drainage $35C,000 IIellman Avenue San Bernardino Rd. to Church St. $ 35,800 Widening Archibald Avenue 19th St. to Highland Ave. $ 85,000 Reali,nment and 1idening Berfl Aven,-,c L,.mon to 500 `t. North $ 30,UOG Widcni r. � any' ) ?econstruction r PR102I 16. 17. 18 2 STP.i T Arrow Route Ch ,urch Street Base Line Road 91 LIMITS /!3TSCP -2TION Archib,A,J to Haven Widenin'. Center to Haven Widening Alta Cuesta to West City Limits ES'T'I`^.hr -rl— CC)--. $ 82,00c $ 73,200 $ 34.9nb $?,559,600 ENGINEERING DIi/ISIO'4 L RANGE C?!PITAL IMPROVEME PROGRR , A RIAL RESURFACING A140 RECC949TRUCTIO11 PRIORITIES PRIORITY — r STREET LI "•1IT5 � o /DESCRIPTION EST7`•I�kTE 1• Carnelian Street Hi ghland to Dan-van �— Resurfacing $1501000 2• Archibald Avenue Minor Reconstruction S/O Highland Avenue ,. 30,000 S/O Banyan 3- S=apphire Street Thoroughbred to Jannet Reconstruction $ 21,000 4 • Her.„osa Avenue c �/O Nineteenth Street to Victoriz Resurfacing ,° 26,000 5- Archibald Avenue Fourth to Nineteenth Street Resurfac ng (Phased) $400,kl00 6- Victoria Avenue Pecan to Etiwanda Resurfacing $ 20,000 7' Lemon %venue Her -mosa to Cartilla Resurfacing $ 16,500 $- Base Line Road I - -15 to Etiwanda W Widening and Resurfacing $ 22'� 9- Hillside Road Amethyst to Beryl Resurfacing $ 40,000 10. Hillside Road Rancho Wash to Carnelian Resurfacing $ 20,000 11- Beryl Avenue Manzanita to Hillside Resurfacing $ 50,000 12. rermosa Avenue S/O Victoria St. Resurfacing (see 1..'•4) 13. Hellman Avenue Church Street to Base Line Resurfacing $ 32,000 14• Church Street P.rchibald to He1'.raan Resurfacing $ 32,000 15• Carnelian Strect Banyan to Demons Channel $ 31,000 Resurfacing E r '�ICi�ITY STREET LIMITS/DESCRIPTION --- LISTIiWr- -D COS, . 15. East Avenue Nineteenth Street to Soruit $ 46,500 Resurfacing 17. Etiwanda Avenue Foothill to 23rd Street 150,000 Resurfacing g (Phao .,ed) 13- Amethyst Street Various N/O Nineteenth Street (see n „25) • Resurfacing 19. Ninth Street Vineyard to Grove Resurfacing $ 36,8U0 20. Fellman Avenue Cucamonga Creek to Arrow $ 1,000 Resurfacing and Reconstruction 21. Turner Avenue Fourth Street to 26th Street $ 38,500 Resurfacing 22. Vineyard Avenue Carnelian _ an to Bas: $ 27,000 Resurfacing 23. Street 8th Street to 9th Street $ 20,500 Resurfacing 2'. -• Beryl Avenue Base Line to Banyan Resurfacing $ 49,500 25. Arethyst Avenue Base Line to Highland $ 40,000 Resurfacing 26. Hillside Road Archibald to Fiaven $ 35,000 Resurfacing 27• Base Line P.oad Haven to Etiwanda $ 77;500 28. Arrow Route Vineyard to Baker $ 40,000 29. Banyan Street Beryl to Carnelian $ 6,000 30. Highland Avenue Archibald to Hermosa $ 10,000 31. San Bernardino Rd Archibald to Hellman $ 35,000 32• Fourth Street (D1 /S)Cucamonga Creek. to Hellman $135,000 $1,6G3,800 s ENGINEERING DIVTg70 (RANGE CAPITAL I h1PROVE'NE PP.CGR .1 i SPECIAL PROJECTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION iSTIi•?A ED Co_, Guard Rail Reol.acement Turner @ Church $ 4,800 Hellman @ Foothill 6,900 Hellman @ 8th Street $ 27,000 Turner @ 8th Street $ 6,900 Turner @ Foothill. $ 20,1.00 Haven Avenue, Deer Creek to Highland Avenue $ 345,000 Allen Reconstruction S/0 Foothill - Archibald to Klusmaa $ 37,000 N10 Foothill - E/0 Archibald ` Court House $ 7,600 N10 Base Line IJ /O City Offices a` 18,Op0 S/n Foothill W/O and parallel to Archibald $ 4,200 ti/O Arro';- Hellman. to Carnelian ` E/O Pschibald S/O & Parallel to Foc;hill Blvd. $ 48,600 Milliken Avenue Grade Separation at Santa Fe Railroad (R /I4 Protection) $5,104,000 Haven Avenue Grade Separation at Santa Fe Railroad (R /Iti Protection; $3,176.000 Seventh Street Interchange with-1-15 Include (R/jq Protection) No Cost Foothill. Interchange with 1, -15 (RAPT Protection) No Cost Demons Channel Equestrian Bridge at Jasper Street $ 15,000 Deer Cree'; Lridgc Betterments $258,241 Local. Street P.r• ^,i.tr�.�ri� /,eal C,:ts (see attar ^ed map) (current bac %iog) $35U,000 ; Future, Local. SLreeL- Rcrurfaciac /Seal Coat; $100,000 I �I .I qp RcCON•fidEKDED TRAFFIC SIONAL PRICRITY I 1TERS ECTION Carnelian and Lemon Archiba'-Ld and Fourth 3 Modify Grove and Arrow 4 Archibald and Sixth Street 5 :z 7 8 9 10 �I 11 12 13 1, 15 16 Carnelian and San Bernardino Rd Archibald and 19th Street STATUS To be completed by develoaer. Under study by C:aLTP. ANTS Pas- Line and Beryl Street �' -edify Grove and San Bernardino Rd .i0dify Grove and Ninth Street Vineyard and Ninth Street i:'th Street and Beryl Street 19th Street and .vurcthvst 19th Street: and Hellman Avenue SaP?hire and 19th Street Fcothill and Red Hill CounLY Club Dr Archibald and Nint;t Street ESTIMATED COST $60,000 50,000 60,000 80,000 60,000 60,000 50,000 60,000 60,00C 60,000 50,000 0,000 50,000 50,000 60,000 50,000 TOTAL $910,000 Hellman and Foothill - high priority if SS•:C and SEC develo ^r.,ents to go 9.n. rIovG to v2. a � RECC_.L .$;IDZD r_ r�jalT,, 1 2 qp RcCON•fidEKDED TRAFFIC SIONAL PRICRITY I 1TERS ECTION Carnelian and Lemon Archiba'-Ld and Fourth 3 Modify Grove and Arrow 4 Archibald and Sixth Street 5 :z 7 8 9 10 �I 11 12 13 1, 15 16 Carnelian and San Bernardino Rd Archibald and 19th Street STATUS To be completed by develoaer. Under study by C:aLTP. ANTS Pas- Line and Beryl Street �' -edify Grove and San Bernardino Rd .i0dify Grove and Ninth Street Vineyard and Ninth Street i:'th Street and Beryl Street 19th Street and .vurcthvst 19th Street: and Hellman Avenue SaP?hire and 19th Street Fcothill and Red Hill CounLY Club Dr Archibald and Nint;t Street ESTIMATED COST $60,000 50,000 60,000 80,000 60,000 60,000 50,000 60,000 60,00C 60,000 50,000 0,000 50,000 50,000 60,000 50,000 TOTAL $910,000 Hellman and Foothill - high priority if SS•:C and SEC develo ^r.,ents to go 9.n. rIovG to v2. a � CITY Of l2ANC1 i0 A' ON ;(' A M ENJORAIN UI.,r DATE: April l-, 1981 TC= City Council and City Manager FRO.]: Lloyd B. Hubbs, Cit•� Engineer gineer SUBJECT: Transportation Financing 2 recently had the opportunity to attend the League of Public Works Officers CL-nference in Sacramento. The major topic of this confer- ence was the tremendous lack of funding to maintain and develop the State Highway, Roads and Streets system. As I'M sure the Council aware that we are currently on the verge of losing the finest h -gh- way systems in the world and along with it the Primary capital asset of the State and its Cities and Counties. The League thrcuah its Public Works Division has determined that the time has cone to make the public aware of what- it is cbout to loses an' to develop support in the Legislature for a program to s,-,-- investor f`nt The League is sponsoring a bill authored by Se_a.tor John Fcran. This bill is SB215 and is summarized in the attached material. The bill basically raises license and user fees, protects all gasoli per gallon. ne sale taxes for transportation uses and raises the gas tax by two (2; cenf_� The erosion of gar tax funds have been dramatically demonstrated in a report prepared by the California Transportation Commission which shows the dramatic loss of value of transportation funding. Most Cities have been forced to completely delete roadway and have begun const- uction g to defer maintenance for extended PerNods_ Most major maintenance programs vary from 10 to 25 years, depending upon traffic volumes, severity of climdte. Because of reve1;ue shortages, the scheduled .cycles have been extended repeatedly, t17itil they have become meaningless. The City of Oakland's resurfacing progiain pre- sently budgeted 5 miles per year of total maintained mile of 778. The impact of maintenance deferal is a false economy Which if not stopped will result in a near total failure of tha system and immense reconstruction cost. The CTC report points out that I. between resurfacing a The difference 20 years of service is after. 5 years of service compared to after constant approxiinatclY a four -fold increase, asst:ming dollar". "The cost of properly maintaining, a roadway is estimated to be one q aster the cost of rehabilitating a road that has been allowed to deteriorate and one -tenth the cost of comoletcly rebuilding it ". Page 2 I Because the residential street mileage within Rancho Cucamonga is so new only 20% of our 220 mile system is beginning to require rehabilitation. The major street system requires extensive and in some cases, constant attention. Engineering is currently quantify- ing these needo and will be presenting these needs to the Council as a part of the lbudget process. At that time, it is hoped that the Council will strongly support the Foran Bill and will carefully con- s =der street needs within tb= City. The Foran Bill is only a holding action which will arrest the d;ateri- Oration. To deal effectively v?-4,,.h the problem will require much stronger ac -lion and further tax increases. "'he Council has the opportunity to take a lead in saving our rccl system. Pespectfully submitted, C. LBH:jaa Attachments CC: Jack Lam Paul Rougeau Monte Prescher Dave Leonard Barry Hogan March 12, 1981 SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE <70 =n Francis Foran, Chairman ANAI•YSIS - S.L. No. 215 As Amended Fecrua (Fora-) ry 13, 1981—) Subjects Transportation financing. DESCRIPTION S This bill would increase various Motor Vc,hicle Account fees B and the gallonage tax on gasoline and diesel uel. The bulk of these increases would be phased in over a three -year Period, beginning- in 1982. 5 The bill also would shift gradual3.y revenues generated by the tax sales on gasoline from the General Fund to the State Highway Account P and local transportation funds. I N The key areas and features of the bill A • are: N '1r_,'_0r Vehicle Account C E e Vehicle registration fees would be increased Y from the present $11 to $19 in 1982, $21 in E 1983 and $22 in 1984. Fees for the transfer S Of registration and duplicate registrations would increase from $3 to $7 upon passa of the bill. ge o Driver's license fees would increase from the present $3.25 to $8 in 1982, $10 in 1983 and $12 in 1984. Identification cards would increase from $3 to $6, except for senior citi<.ens who would continue to pay $3. c Commercial truck weight fees would increase by a cumulative total of 40 percent in 1982, SO Per!ent in 198-1 and 60 percent in 1984. The bill would require that all weight- fee revenues, less the costs of collections, be deposited in the Sate Rich' -lay Account rather than the Motor Vehicle Account. more.......... i CI S3 215 (reran) —�- March 12, 19E1 Fees for trip permits and the registration of out -of -state vehicles also would $5 be and $6, respectively, to $10, raised from nouSecretary of the Business, Transportation and �ousiMg Agency would be required to sui. -,it a report to the Legislature by January 10, 1985 on the adequacy of fees charged for support o° state orerati.ons funded from the b ?otor -T i :�cceunt. Fo1- �wup reports would be eh —c -e on a periodic "- recuired oasis. Fuel Taxes The exi.stir. 7 5 teas - der- aailon tzr. on ^o-or Vehicle fuel would be increased b 2 tents gzilon, ber;rning i. 1 Y c-.._:, per In 19Aa. One --ent o� t:.e i.acraasp would be retained by the the other cent would be allocated toacitir�sle and counties, the federal fuel tax of 4 �. was reduced, cents per gallon t:�e sate fuel tax would be lncr.eased by the same amount so that the comi:ined federal and state fuel tax rate equals 13 cents per gallon. • An additional, one -time, allocation of $100 cities in. fuel tax revenues would be m, e to cities and counties during 1982 -83 for streets and roads purposes. ev Cities and counties for the first time would share in diesel fuel tax revenues. p Counties would l,e pertittcd to impose an additional ruei tax, in cne -cent increments, if 1, voters approve the incrzase, and 2) the revenues are used for the transportation, purposes specified in Article \2:! of the California Constitution. more.......... AN SB 215 (in) -3_ ch 12, 1981 ° Counties would be required to contract with the State Board of Equalization for administra- tion of.any county fuel tax and Payment of the costs of administration. s Seventy percent of the State Highway Account funds used for new construction would be allocated to counties on t-e basis of each county's contribut:iou to the account. The remaining 30 percent woull be allocated by the California Transportation Cmmmission on a statewide needs basis. ° The authority of the California Transportation Commission to pay the cost_ of toll bridge maintenance from toll bridge revenues would be deleted. Payment of these maintenance expenses would be made from the State Highway Account, as provided in current law. Sales Tax on Fuel ° "Spillover" revenues from the sales tax on motor vehicle fuel which currently are retained in the General Fund, gradually would be shifted to transportation' uses. The bill would cap the General Fund fue l at $150 million in 1981 -82 and reduce this amount by $30 million annually ($120 million in 1582 -83, $90 million in 1983 -84, etc.) One -half of the sales tat revenues shifted from the General Fund would be transferred to the State Highway Account and one -half would be allocated to local agencies for streets and highway and transit purposes. _. �,iangcs (In millions) 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 State ev.;nuc Increase 1982 1933 1984 1985 1986 t,Otor vehicle Account State Iiighway Account Rt : °� - °- Izcreace TOTAL o r I t Transfer from G,ar:eral Fund I ! To State ----- TO -Local -Agencies - $112 $103 29 205 $ 0 $ ioo $1-.1 $408 -36 -11° $146 313 $163 $527 -190 $ 18 $ 59 $ 18 59 $165 $169 331 337 $172 $176 $'068 $632 -223 -255 95 $11-q $1�9 95 114 129 --------- - - ---' In 17 ^F-3� rl 7? �-r, ( L- a.iS. -� Lij•� va` gu-ve, •SAN �dO.ebYY'+�. nia C,i " Ba~ a�7+...v C y. wwv lnGf44f•, JOINT STATEIkIENT BY THE COUNTY SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA AND THE LEAGUE. OF CALIFORNIA CITIES REGARDING THE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING CRISIS AT THE CITY. AND COUNTY LEVEL IN CALIFORNIA. The Co; :Llty Supervisors Association of California (CSAC) and the League of California Cities MCC) rc:c.�gnize the need to increase local road and street financing. The two o-;anizaticns jolit in a cooperative effort to ensure that this serious crisis is addressed by the Leis :azure. The facts can no longer be ignored without serious fiscal and proms Corse .u;:nces. program As a cedescrian, cyclist, transit patron or driver, we are dependent upon a system of city streets county }roads and state highways. As consumers, the cost we pay for the delivery of goods and services is also directly related to this same system of roadways. The lorJer the service level this system provides. the higher the user costs. Directly related user costs aiiected by this lower service include vehicle repairs, maintenance and dcprer_iation, fuel corsumption and insurance premiums. Often overlooked related costs include delays, exposure to hazards and the cost for the delivery of goods and services. The condition of the roadwsy system in the State of California in serious jeopardy due to a lack of funding. The Census Bureau has reported that California ranks the lowest of all states in per capita expenditure for highways. Reduced governmental expenditures for hiohways'are neither ;ost :effective nor economical if the result is higher total costs to the cr „su :ner. Adequate road and street rraintennnce and timely safety improvements need to ade'goate funding base. Such expenditures can substantially reduce other user cos *s. California is experie•lcing a rapid decline in transportation capital investment, safety irnprov^ments and just plain maiiiicnancc. There has been recent prr_ss coverage of the state hi hwav system revenue shot tfnll: The disastrous impact on COU•tty roads and city streets has not yet received the same coverage as the state highway needs; }et, the bull: Of the transportation system is in loco] facilities, and the local needs are accelerating ns the reve: t decressc. Not all cities and counties have identical problems due to dif trenc s rarginm front r-ge of existill- facilities, expansion and development potential, shift:;., - opulation patterns: terrain an:.i seasonal differences, etc.; but, all local agencies Ct eJ;k,2riencirlo tt-� effects of inflation arid rising effects include reduced maintenance capability, inrreasl.dltort liability exposures insbility to rc: :pond to safety instillations, and inability to maintain viable improvement promr:uns. \ As ea sting systerns deteriorate the cost to cure the result;n; prcblems dr:tstically rmCCCU;. i.j U ilC ' Oft”) USCr is t it onn oIlar of ti;cly Or1C Icn ml-linter.ence now will s,lve Utt!on U., VIP..] 1r0;:1 nu•v. 1t0UO 21:10 Sheet n:0111tenanco find pr.:ceni e ^ ?itai ii.; rev;: - P �.a�.a� C o,, louars. u1e cost of hi .-h•:ray maintenance and construction has in The value of the Pr Wt 7c t `he average rate of 18% on inal 7e gas tax is approxirnatel Pnnum for the last five g rate authorized in 19u3. The y 1�3 of the )ears' iAttachment). purchasing Purchasing power of the P continu,2; to erode each year Recent testimony by local agencies before the Transportation Committees Legislature illustrate the dramatic impacts of r County it has 5cen riecessar the current revenue shortfall. In or the because the existing Y to scarify existing paved roads back tog g Oakland's paving could not be mainto' brave' sta,_tws Preventive maintenance resurfacing Program 5 07 years while it e recognized that a maximum in a safe condition. The City of length of 2 , pro °ram is rapidly extreme range of a. cost effective is r P e a cycle l approaching a cycle maximum of a 30 -year cycle length is the curtailed reeog Program. Many cities and counties have drastically maintenance °n12ed maintenance programs involving maintenance and street cleaning, and are struggling minor street paving, traffic sign would take a Pro °ram' Caltrnns, private bblirg to maintain a minirnum at least an and local !overnment stnA;ae a:__. hard ado.ttonar r^-�_L .. .11 ,very serve - -- -..., v„e,nents and - ..,,cn,.,v pavements for automobile traffietrtranortation needs geOntrnurag maintenance includir. safe and serviceable that enhances air quality n transit vehicle use, goods delivery in an environment 5 nd provides for saving of energy, cannot be provided without a reasonable revenue base, million Der year to A The same studies indicate that it Lvor, ?rt rnL sr•n�.,..,_ r_tura Pil r.�...... -- - ancrs Other factors have also contributed to the de Y systems. These include tP a following: terioration of cif and county highway 1. Aza The local system of streets and roads - g g still reduce the need for major repairs and reconstructionDue to existing system this Timely maintenance can car, no longer be deferred without accelerated deterioration. 2. Truck_ Weights the age of the The maximum truck weights were indicate that heavi increased in 1974. . Numerous studies clearly er vehicles have a definite impact and aceelera! Of roadways. At the local level these conditions have al eady serious funding a deterioration o crisis as most small trips begin and end on loci exacerbated the 3. Ircr�asIn :Mobility Trends and Im roved Fuel Er_onornv Willie total fuel consumption has modest' dramatically increased. The result is more decreased L'ehicle fuel efficiency has accelerated tae deteric �ti°n and increased the the roadways improvements- need for safet • which has 3 and operational Local agencies have transportation needs• historically supplemented hig user fees to Provide of local government to roposition 13 �,. htvay u continue and I,oposition 4 have severely cur iled he required stru;gle to allocate diminishing to all °cafe general funds to transportation tax and oth,:r resources tr needs ICr feel proposals needs in the o�ert:he! ntirtm,. needs hould be strongrl�cztscd support of transportntioalneccase the g;1s al ag SUeil be supported. needs inclJdtttg trans. nor: state reve The evidence of the needs is ?ort.n.tion s,stcrn can be t111e is the 1_. county roads and city streets. m•untalned at all leveh in1 C; California-stah� t a viable 0. highv:NyS. )e E] E !i;,; . DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCFIO CIIONGA ST.AJ-4T RE PORT June 10, 1981 Members of the Planning Commission Barry K. Hogan, City Planner Michael Vairin, Senior Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE FLKMII N0. $1-05 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY - The development of an electrical distribution substation on 4.78 acres of land in the R -1 -20 zone located on the northwest corner of Archibald and Wilson Avenues - APN 1061 - 571 -04 BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of May 13, 1981, continued the public hearing on this matter to this date to allow representatives of the Edison Company to meet with homeowners in the vicinity of the project to work out concerns voiced by the citizens. The representatives. from Edison have met with Staff to review some of the concerns that were raised by citizens to the Staff. However, Edison was unable to arranqe a meeting prior to the compilation of this report and is therefore asking contin- uance of the hearing to June.24, 1981. Attached is a letter from Edison requesting the continuance and a letter which Edison sent to surrounding property owners for the meeting. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planninq Commission continue the public hearing to June 24, 1981. d, Attachments: Letter from Southern California Edison Letter to Property Owners ITE14 C 1977 R. Vt. BOND AREA MANAOQR Southern California Edison Company UPLAND. CALIFORNIA 91766 June 1, 1.981 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. U. Sox 837 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Mr. Michael Vairin, Planning Department Gentlemen: SUBJECT: C.U.P. No. 81 -05 - Southern California Edison Attached is a copy of a letter sent to all residents in the vicinity of our proposed Alta Loma Substation at Wilson and Archibald Avenue who have expressed concern with the project. As you suggested, we are requesting that action by the Planning Commission be postponed until the June 24 meeting to allow more time to resolve the concerns of homeowners in the neighborhood. Please call me at 947 -2996 if you have other complaints or suggestions relative to C.U.P. No. 81 -05. RWB:mb Attachment Si:a;erely, R. W. �$�jnd =a TCLCVNONE (714) 947.2996 1] 0 Southern California Edison Company 422 NORTH LCCOND'AVC. UPLAND. CALIPONNIA 91100 R. W. BOND June 1, 1981 AREA MAN -OCR Mr. and Mrs. Glenn Shaw 5625 Klusman Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Shaw: As you know,. Southern California Edison Company has requested a Conditional Use Permit to build an elec- trical distribution substation on 2.42 acres of a five -acre parcel located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Wilson Street in Alta Loma. Since severe.l residents in the vicinity of the prorosed project have expressed concern with the visual appearance of a substation, I have arranged for a meeting tc, be held at 7:30 p.m. June 9 (Tuesday) at the Lions Park Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. I have also informed the City Planning Department of the homeowners meeting and requested that action be post- poned on our request to the Planning Commission at the June 10 meeting. Your expressions of concern are appreciated. Hopefully, we can disc-ass them with you on June and arrive at a mutually acceptable improvement planned for your neighborhood. I look forward to meeting you. Sincerely, R. W. Blind RWB:mb CC: City of Rancho Cucamonga 91 T(I,CPMGMC (71.) Cu44N4 11 E CITY OF RANCl -10 CL;CC TONGA STAFF POW DATE: June 10, 1981 u L TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner SUB-:ECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11696 VANGUARD - A custom lot subdivision of 2.0 acres of land into 6 single family residential lots in the R -1- rf,500 zope, located west of Sapphire Street at the western terminus of Garden Court - APN 201- 201 -33 V, l ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting approval of a custom lot sub- division of 6 lots in the R -1 -8,500 zone. Since the proposed sub- division meets all applicable requirements, and appears to be a logical extension of existing development, the Staff is recommending approval with appropriate conditions. BACKGROUND: The application entails a request for the approval of a Tentative Tract Map for a custom lot subdivision of 6 lots on 2.0 acres in the R -1 -8,500 zone. The proposed subdivision is located west of Sapphire Street at the western terminus of Garden Court, just south of the future Route 30 right -of -way (Exhibit "A "). The project site is currently vacant and is not in use at this time. Numerous piles of loose dirt and debris have been dumped in the northerly portion of the property. The site has a slope of about 4% to the southeast. Several mature trees are located on the property on its northern portion. The proposal has been submitted as a custom lot subdivision and has been reviewed in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance. The Tentative Map, (Exhibit "B "), received a point rating in excess of the required threshold, and is therefore eligible for consider- ation and approval by the Planning Commission. The Conceptual Grading Plan, submitted in conjunction with the Tentative Map, has also been reviewed by the Grading Committee, and received approval in concept only (Exhibit "C "). ANALYSIS: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use Designation of Low Density, 2 -4 du's /.ac, and the project also appears to meet current zoning requirements. The surrounding land uses and zoning are described as follows: ITEM D Staff Report TT 11696 Site North East Southwest -2- LAND USE Vacant Vacant, Single Family Single Family Vacant, Flood Control Channel June 10, 1981 ZONING R -1 -8,500 R -1 -8,500 R -1 -8,500 R -1 -8,500 The Subdivision Map has been prepared in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Public access into the subdivision has been predetermined by the existing location of Garden Court. The proposed Grading Plan utilized con- ventional grading techniques, resulting in all lots being graded in their entirety. However, the applicant has made an effort to avoid excessive slopes wherever possible. Also attached for your review is Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant. The Staff has completed Part II of the Initia-, Study, the Environmental Checklist and has conducted a field investigation. As a result of the 'investigation and completion of the study, Staff has found no significant adverse impacts on the environment that could occur as a result of this subdivision. There- fore, issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. CORRESPONDENCE: The Tentative Map was advertised as a public hearing item in the Daily Report newspaper. In addition, about a dozen public hearing notices were mailed to property owners located within a 300' radius of the tract boundaries. To date, no correspondence regarding the proposed subdivision has been received. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission con - duct a public is hearing and consider all public comments. If, after such hearing, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions recom -• tended by Staff, the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with 7nditions would be appropriate. Res,pe-tfujly,_ submi tted ; W BKH:OK- A;.tachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C" - Initial Study Resolution of Conditions of Location Map Tentative Tract Map Conceptual Grading Plan - Part 1 Approval Approval 11 Imo' LZ Fm 1P. M11U FI Qw V "QoQfM AL M too"., roornL{. vINSMnY M/, d m CITY Or- RANCHO C CANMO GA PLC NNENG DIVISION crt• Yr[. ,MANY Het 1 � I• 49 fs yW r.v. awur Y fJ rEMTAT /VC TRAC NORTH IMM: TITLE: 4e4642 . . E\111131T:— SCALE: (.To r,ORiM —rcd w� 6 L I �C ♦�s 4 w..wr reoruru nr�v�t t 8 0 w ri: �5♦ ♦ i VICINITY IWAP E l ter: IT CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO C ��" 1,1.k NGA TITI.r: PLANNING DIVISION EXI'II >lT: bw.�� SCALL•: 'I I� a � 1 L._ nrw zrlrccr FORTH ,I 11 .A NORTH tl h A IA. M vau � �ZLT Or rC Ml4M1Vi1v ,� /W ' � /1Y /IVpC /IFIM(�l. �..y_ yI4YC1W4i • '�rII1 �..v��.11 �N. 1 11• �1 �W4ta Mw1 c �" •f GT r� Z lei I �YCL C�61fY L A 41Y.�AI1® LMy rpYM wLLA At01M(f 1iM nt AN1.q�lp nl fin VIIMG r _"wwoc� r. COU11T� _ f �I n" SIPECT NORTH CITY Or iZ•.ANC LO CU AN IONGA TIT'-E- e-tf* gm PLANtiING DIVISION ExitIIiIT: �C` SCALE :_ �_. E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11696 WHEREAS, 'tentative Tract Map No. 11696, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Vanguard Venture, applicant, for the purpose of subdividiva the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a custom lot subdivision of 2.0 acres of land in the R -1 -8,500 zone, loca ed west of Sapphire Street at the western terminus of Garden Court - A?N 201 - 201 -33 into 6 lots, regularly carne before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action an June 10, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evi�1cnce presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11696 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (a) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with sil applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Im L_ J r] Resolution No. Page 'G (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Ilap No. 11696, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions: APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution - -is duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Wonission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of June, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: N >N J� ��OY �IU� T•.1 RJ9 A C i 1 r N N d N �. O u + 6 ..O �. •.J N ? S C. �•V R } w .^.. K J n N d T^ W R A > M1 1L N N •Y r y ^NN 6 +� Of1 pO,a ° LLrN �N ^.N •0 VOb 4N Wa TJ Trr T p ^^ MO Jr jp� 47 9 w ' g r _ Yd• m° n 'o 6 � A 0 • N p n b ' 6 s I ^ N_ RN N N R � r .O N o J r. O N � fi 6 > N7 J na w � ro A naa °> J n N w: 0 J T N n so a O � N � 6 A � n v 0 J N O b H� O y N y= f" �n S m ° A 0 c N r O ym S i 'n ti S N gN N O> N N 6 N n 0 r v V a O W > > N G {Pi n lily W' Y TY u jy ! MRY ON 6r'ir �N R. Z. � .J - !.> . >E CaN u. d YN lA �AV �,w Nom^ � III �V nOT yN Ofni{� w�q RN1 + TY Jan y0, INi ^N r b R6v O �O GbT un. i °M1a NNC 6S Vi.y Y ->•.N AN J ° •1 ouN iM• V] J v y^i ,ly 41 N ✓ ?I C O• Y o � A T r N 1 �O T .N. 7a ii n yJV m� o ^� o 0 > R N {O O,d ' N Cr N >J R N6b =N Aw N f� �^ u W v •O < 'o.rvro Y N > C moo] n6R >x W > biN n. Tr. jjY KN 6 O•tr d 1p NNV•< y. rvo. nv Oro n w n� ;1` >p. < .°_•.'p' rv^ w >,< n °n a'iR >° >�. � ^O,�j' a. QN w db •wOR �rN WOPo >n7 i3 -�•pO N >NV>i 7 p A N4 3a 6 J ~� O W J n R� J uP• D r ^'N N v 1.0 W c N{'O n� nV J'N w�0 •°AN WW •°F R >ON V"1 14 < .Y} � an A m�'n �-• ppJJ a � O � O -1 S C� _ , O W J. ^ J i > l > > n V ^ > N .- N f• n n ... s I ^ N_ RN N N R � r .O N o J r. O N � fi 6 > N7 J na w � ro A naa °> J n N w: 0 J T N n so a O � N � 6 A � n v 0 J N O b H� O y N y= f" �n S m ° A 0 c N r O ym S i 'n ti S N gN N O> N N 6 N n 0 r v V a O W > > N G {Pi n lily ! �I � III VIII p� N Y � 41 N ✓ ?I C O• Y �• p A T r N 1 �O T .N. B> °n 9 =N T� 'o.rvro -sj � >x W "_.o biN n. > � i mPm° -W ° >♦'•. n. NNV•< y. rvo. nv a w n� ;1` >p. a.. wn .°_•.'p' rv^ w >,< n °n a'iR >° >�. � ^O,�j' a. QN w db •wOR �rN WOPo >n7 T� -�•pO N >NV>i 7 p >N N4 3a S n RT6 >O RN rnb ^'N 1.0 j• N{'O n� nV J'N w�0 •°AN WW •°F R >ON V"1 14 < .Y} ppJJ n r. V_r r � O -1 S C� _ , O W J. ^ J i > l > > n ^ N .- f• n n ... .ri •{ C y JN �O�iu WO: T� W.O R.= � iSr_ LN > N6 .41 •Yry ;O p O �V n 2 R A rfWi r N �. a O > N O' ry N j • •�• >' N p S {a M1 N V O n n O a- J r ol N O.n t�N Onj u>•Nq AN �SCA•'W O J ° ?N ^ > W> ° O dC O qq E d 4 A A Rw A � Y a �. rv' a l J J 1 p 4. ♦ J O n L t R S N _. O r ^ _.. un• t w � a y on'N ��"' .'�- °. Nic�w.' t °m °� ni ,ncv •:° v° N t w, c° n� ^ > Z w N r• V i T n l a O J ^ "{ r S N l J Tl n V, W > W J rw V N 6 1 N T S n W O+ \ O C N x i� c .O J 6 J b N S -. •y � � �^ ; 6 p N O. N> N V •< W j� •. n= R N °C , •n• o T r -1 o°. nN.. ^y r D] ° a`N °�^O' o'cvv .0 >° q � J N P i O N -{ 2 ° a^.. ° L ? ^!i N.°c am •'O ° � � 9 d• �p w o> `n R6 �o n ,n- W 6< W.�♦ -'. O J a> W W a• R .'+ n3'N 6 u°. -' '° 6 u^i w Q ^' ^ N O N W � w a > b �•PC n W J O .0 Y W J -W..•puLi rf � 6 > d P -� J :! ^ NS i. N W • r N r�O N O N ♦ T 7 c TN O6 WJtiw .O. nO N R .>i O 4 6 A n 'J O O T Q S 0 m n n ♦ El A 1 Y •1u rl ' a n O Im I IN I_ %. .O m O• V. 6 W � s � �' Y � r• j? � Vi D 6 D t� N A N m d I.'. _ w F t0 n� m P 3. > O N j' '.�..[ t %. �Wb ^ r...D NtvO l�Ip r w nC+- ^L +•>dr wPN 6VVJJ N wn .<i.�O.O .. r T r. Y Y ro evi r. W VPi r �. N .r � d � r J �� F I•li I D > O � N n M r N L w n� 1, S Oe•• G YN -•O > '• p C -. }p � � 'q ryD` NV W .^i. N yV F >> r. OP +.T N„ W r , y `M >• p qJ ^Nf' yn >y >.O ^n TL n1p .0 yr >N.A 10 �wc�oP 'Y nn an. va^�o p N •�" 'N'�� W �a row o.'-i° ndNN i3 �b hoc >nN Cq fJ N >' F6 nuN•N >,J T' w6 O...N OLw l'lnq^ 1gi�N >� lgrd� ��_ W N °r F oA nr s a � . ro a ^iiN v rr N r r �r.R NO r>•:• �9 W I +• t •)•6F v O n9 60J �W ° m O O P q. 2• NN IO fi> a �> N� .b r> � l J --S•.. ro40 � (^y �. P uGt } N u �w Y n.. ^^. P�� T��lr V•Nn 6N rJN NF. Vr40.N CrV� W 9r_ 6 r w �O q 6K 01 N on rgi _ ,I• y O .9 J ii i b�°.PJ a OJ C� N < ,• �N y n o• v J V ro >, > a �>•_ Via. ..nv nWu0P3 a Imn r-- NP isln, vr a49 uv > n Jr Sb w+d` N S F64 �N 110 : 2-V Nry ��> l N O 6C C 6 w14 < OOd•+ q l u. N q+J> 14 S T � bd W � � l a.r v +. °-.• > m .J.. r n i N r O- � ud .°b .N. � q0 NnJ >K >6W >,q l0. ^ 6�•S 'N J > Wl col c' ro� y� uT+.n V DSi 7qc p-. O 6 '� p; O y. r w Y� W c n 6 • 'p T D r >� r n e N_ N r f. F+ NNNO_ O N T N Na IO �-F lqr P >• NPn >WryN NIK +-6 -J l 6° •O 6IO FNP ^� P tp >n y a n•O n0 S O.O a� T Ci < . � q J u J we rN Vro Wn J K a:� tF Na>nW J O i e+ O m o Wro m Nn OS� V• �ro n+• q tN 1D +.N OO JD "'•� r .. n Ow 6 l nW F 0. +. q O •t .l« ••. ^ , O G O, S d J O l W O u O 4 6 J N d A 6 �•. n T N r C N O ^> O LL Y j > C r r V H •t N W' fwJ = d N _ O � O. n� 10 F d +• O ,J W O 6 O.+^. N N DC MN >�> Kr4O bSnn J O >VCO N LRq O O O,O A >;6 • Ip q G Nq rid t >+• �W � q� 09 l� Y S'O yVN.j F.O N S4 IN O r•wq ^ Sa Sr LaP ��J rO�yJT O .1tN On-W. lSr VNNO > R T O•� 3 OT p U U ? _N O Q a00F p> r 6 !J d > N W� ro F N_ V•• 6 <� _S pO O O .>r•ry ^^ dm ° A 0. lC �y tl >T b SK > 6 i0 l > 4 n o.d-. S Q I I i IN Ir �� IW I, I• � I• I i P N L W VJ O T4.}v. nd 09 O< %r�.O n 6FT �} ��rT.j Tv NV� NIb ➢ TJJ CAA .nC£> NA `d-I r 2 d r O L O. b M1 N n N � N J 9 D r. W C K >FYN N ID N O P r N Ll J nl NniO N JOO•L�rLO 4W r R» Aq J n••Ol •W d �M r- r ap3 • •I v G e d > fj v L l O1 .>�.. a n Nom{ r. n ib r t0.0 y° .-1 .•O. ro 1>w T 9 =('� n D'- 9 I ^ U .OD T q O A b d J N O N � `� J. Ot > n n N > r. •N � N > m q W r N O r j0 w l lN�q q N WTW �O. gNJ rin NfT �0VJ06�� O. 6 •Wr• vq J1-J OSu• V14� �O r.0 Nr.W 'N N Nlw > l�N C+9•r d q rn NJQ OHO. 6 >O OI O => V.Yd nW 1° VNN N C r Y Y q O 106 + } n 9.e roN °� ID n n nn i ... qi• • '� > J �QYO , P N vb mP vas N l m uA v, a H d N <o q °. n: > vCc o' 1C .y`^ r .. r> •1• S S r O � K •3 N S u• O b? N M S N F W C C r6^ N j. N n ••Si O n ^ n N l w %' NN J .D N lfq nN q TW ••. n N^ r C r a d rtNN pC •t= r Irl N O NO NN N.0 �j n n iri Ol OH 'n< l+�C rFa F Sry 9u dv �N age N N N �• N q O > a 43' n` Ww O T J �y .•. 4 1 J p> 2G1N> O WO <F drN +' N N4 dJ "jn=1 pN t; Nn � N •l0• 69 �_^ Otl Wi? > Oq wbr _ufi -.Q �.NNr q�D Wu I O + fS� 4 6 d W� d Y qn NN6 T q r L,n O OOv O. O.l N 9 _ .-O.N O n o > N •C• •y N O g n J N N �. l V V 9 a n N iir V r1>O O d N 6 b r N Q C d o. -. O y F_ S q� G L 7 •I P l >� O n q O O O 9 T T N N C n n!. � N n S y > W m• ti N N r. N N L N � 6 n O. � l G r S F� O. O n d W i N l' •.N• � ^ :• O q N > N ^ J n C n N q> S - f}j N O .. t7 O^ N n .en } On..> FA V°>• � O q •. >6 Kp >9 t•O n 1 0 6 4^ O^ N TOi. S >_ q •na N .d.• W N 1Y , N �. W q 0 > •• n rO ,� y 'J Y On O° dA r nL }�+•L O .Ji. P4 0 S • 1p _ a n O w I II N 8 W r0 T tomes l +• 9 V a ti 3 N N W l N r n 9 m « ^ ¢N r O � T H r � u A A u Ju �W sN; ^� 7 N � b � 6^ Nn O yn s� ^ r n a u� iN N y tJ l S c i N J n J ¢ n_ W 0 O 7 D , a O A �v , C r N N N n W rN w w w ntan 6 � � O O n a oJin � N q O O O J p D I�, hIQ O rJ O r.b ° rD •' G l6 w W = t N •� J 6 � S N N T •n u: R T1 v. N IDnN. N •C n T a ro N t O N y a N �W t0 D S J O N r � J , o aN J � � < N q ^ Y a Y •G a;� y! Q y`i N = w O b y a n Y O if s 0 Ggn 4' •i x S pn Y Q C9 iD r O d C y O d i < �n A d d A W r a - aL n 6n e N D N 3� 4 G o�T 6 a S N N DN n.' OF. ANtni r.. r Wo^S ^ n r r •+O .TV m iNO) 1 n +_ On� +•• O V N ¢n ^6� N LL 7 A V r • N n y t C 0 L• 3 A Y (l t S m T O 4l 6 nµN nr ^N N < A r 4•T ? 6SW V •ASnl +1 CQQ IL �O N WW 6��•<N �Tnr r D Noi cam+ NQQN �.q. J dWr (or6� m �$J �..N. •ic •nm nr •i6i + d w 7i •O+ N -.n O +W 6 �• N J 6+ W O N S q •1 O W g N J J N N N rNb n06r•- W n n•n w N T j Cp n!. Da0 N an 1. O w n A O 04 r.J 0 o N N O T A T N tn0k N sSnJ Y. +. °K� n N•r.A l J W 4n0 nr�� -••6 =d•fiV W J yJA N N +y r ry a n Ty•On�� n.°.6A W c w:qn< n A A r N r S��,NNiDC�N; ao' a:'r'Nn ��•r` J O �•( i r • , o r •� r �. q• w i1 u n ��D AOr °C NO � 60•C :.6 •4T r w D JO NC �.ry b• D°i N � O S4 N n A . =r r n'nNOwfgi' W V GNJr;�n�•� ^SJ J•••C �i �• w r A . �C �. �2 rTV Pm�J l Y, W rD i r v � N V ••. Cj �• O r j� rO c N4ND •4 �i- .nno�N -• N n N W p. tin M. W N D eJ'ry p N O _ T N OA O C M C'O O N n •J -•ff .0 SO'W l rbN OCl wN_N i�W tlb T �b�•O S�V 6b0 aN�O rnJCN N +, n"°t'C iOl J�•O ^ip ypn - •0.n••t N l n 1, � G N r r [� ll W N O p�• WA n.p N� � N �O -G 6W WJT O C,r¢ n, r' •OW "•�T •no n� W m° min W Jv <a ocm ��.°:. ^ vro� W A or o J. T'Po'op� JoN e n 'or 't o'mA N0.D o bbrTnn JO DMtpN r.J NOA?I r4' Jr.N N WTyN ] "•� e� O ^ Y. 'J r1 ••• S U l N A N N N W •� .W..6 A N O pr 0.A In- M SA n,o' n O ^� W,• ��¢ J Ar Op •+•N N ° 'l -n-,WN N T6NAn nW ,j'n t Rr•' •w tY OO V]A T .•J E A w V_• ; ^n r-r i Nr nw N Rn Q D'tC V N n O _i tN i r 6 tAU �. V •� , N T} M C r J ZL N rrb r 6�.O.. W A ^N r T r n ,ir � _oon non ¢Nio o �m n � n YO W m � 0I._. ��b � � �na c �$ 3m •u r�aO �.0 '"� +w`+cry G�. .17^ iDrU nn.:W rN0• V �•,- bLL n JNn n6O•WJ RND r_a .... 1On N•Cn , SOL W_ O.A.O n¢ J t0 n N n i C T 2 a •4nt,' 4 O W �• 6 O.p O W OO�O� Nn7 y'n .�..r vN} onG N <00' ArN � nOr .nD N o o n W a J 9 a np LL OWnNw �¢ 6Y? ^O.O ir.Y �Nb r Y.�O Tq n O S O •-• 4 .S C A n r t0 n D r• T Q N TD N C -�_ °T rNw NGT w� 9 �r� o' vrir5 �n1 iD � o' r W •e Wb 7yG 1DG iy n' DJ^ rA .. ^NT y � ltinr ^O u n b N 4 r ° •nD P � n^ � m o 0 0 R �O n x H x Q a r O C y � r J'o c' •D..° 9� � � u•°mi Bn °m Ji �� nr us 9oN mN .N. D' a pn '�: 9 A.. O. N N.••rnry �q n6 Nw aT= 0•r NO•..OT qqa ..16 . ��yG ♦dro N.N.. ��_ NW LLJ nnw yO Cj0 Ni ��b T nJ NO ON W^ NDN ,P r ianFN �~rT w•R rf^Nq� TY J r ID l O• n b IO r. L C r ^ •+ ... T F-• iD r3 °< c •- o�[• gr..- n� w A •^. c ono J. °yo'bc •n � _ n r. ro r b n W ..•. J r b< � i ,Nn' °¢ ,.n, m T � J w N D. •°D fO n _° +� -� 4 n yJ nG`•O 6i.<'yj O= r.y p g S � �I, OV n QOr Nn Cr. r. R��N YN WNm •nN � _. O P �¢ S A 6� O N m 1 N r O C G � •O In T A ?.O C S N N A A 6 10 W •� 7 N •~y O, C x v4i N •c « W v_ 10 N v J N. _ M On N^ r. D O .. w •. 4 0 N �O Op t.0 l ni .. • O O N j QQ l N.yT6 2 �� N -•' N I II N 8 W r0 T tomes l +• 9 V a ti 3 N N W l N r n 9 m « ^ ¢N r O � T H r � u A A u Ju �W sN; ^� 7 N � b � 6^ Nn O yn s� ^ r n a u� iN N y tJ l S c i N J n J ¢ n_ W 0 O 7 D , a O A �v , C r N N N n W rN w w w ntan 6 � � O O n a oJin � N q O O O J p D I�, hIQ O rJ O r.b ° rD •' G l6 w W = t N •� J 6 � S N N T •n u: R T1 v. N IDnN. N •C n T a ro N t O N y a N �W t0 D S J O N r � J , o aN J � � < N q ^ Y a Y •G a;� y! Q y`i N = w O b y a n Y O if s 0 Ggn 4' •i x S pn Y Q C9 iD r O d C y O d i < �n A d d A W r a - aL n 6n e N D N 3� 4 G o�T 6 a S N N DN n.' OF. ANtni r.. r Wo^S ^ n r r •+O .TV m iNO) 1 n +_ On� +•• O V N ¢n ^6� N LL 7 A V r • N n y t C 0 L• 3 A Y (l t S m T O 4l 6 nµN nr ^N N < A r 4•T ? 6SW V •ASnl +1 CQQ IL �O N WW 6��•<N �Tnr r D Noi cam+ NQQN �.q. J dWr (or6� m �$J �..N. •ic •nm nr •i6i + d w 7i •O+ N -.n O +W 6 �• N J 6+ W O N S q •1 O W g N J J N N N rNb n06r•- W n n•n w N T j Cp n!. Da0 N an 1. O w n A O 04 r.J 0 o N N O T A T N tn0k N sSnJ Y. +. °K� n N•r.A l J W 4n0 nr�� -••6 =d•fiV W J yJA N N +y r ry a n Ty•On�� n.°.6A W c w:qn< n A A r N r S��,NNiDC�N; ao' a:'r'Nn ��•r` J O �•( i r • , o r •� r �. q• w i1 u n ��D AOr °C NO � 60•C :.6 •4T r w D JO NC �.ry b• D°i N � O S4 N n A . =r r n'nNOwfgi' W V GNJr;�n�•� ^SJ J•••C �i �• w r A . �C �. �2 rTV Pm�J l Y, W rD i r v � N V ••. Cj �• O r j� rO c N4ND •4 �i- .nno�N -• N n N W p. tin M. W N D eJ'ry p N O _ T N OA O C M C'O O N n •J -•ff .0 SO'W l rbN OCl wN_N i�W tlb T �b�•O S�V 6b0 aN�O rnJCN N +, n"°t'C iOl J�•O ^ip ypn - •0.n••t N l n 1, � G N r r [� ll W N O p�• WA n.p N� � N �O -G 6W WJT O C,r¢ n, r' •OW "•�T •no n� W m° min W Jv <a ocm ��.°:. ^ vro� W A or o J. T'Po'op� JoN e n 'or 't o'mA N0.D o bbrTnn JO DMtpN r.J NOA?I r4' Jr.N N WTyN ] "•� e� O ^ Y. 'J r1 ••• S U l N A N N N W •� .W..6 A N O pr 0.A In- M SA n,o' n O ^� W,• ��¢ J Ar Op •+•N N ° 'l -n-,WN N T6NAn nW ,j'n t Rr•' •w tY OO V]A T .•J E A w V_• ; ^n r-r i Nr nw N Rn Q D'tC V N n O _i tN i r 6 tAU �. V •� , N T} M C r J ZL N rrb r 6�.O.. W A ^N r T r n ,ir � _oon non ¢Nio o �m n � n YO W m � 0I._. ��b � � �na c �$ 3m •u r�aO �.0 '"� +w`+cry G�. .17^ iDrU nn.:W rN0• V �•,- bLL n JNn n6O•WJ RND r_a .... 1On N•Cn , SOL W_ O.A.O n¢ J t0 n N n i C T 2 a •4nt,' 4 O W �• 6 O.p O W OO�O� Nn7 y'n .�..r vN} onG N <00' ArN � nOr .nD N o o n W a J 9 a np LL OWnNw �¢ 6Y? ^O.O ir.Y �Nb r Y.�O Tq n O S O •-• 4 .S C A n r t0 n D r• T Q N TD N C -�_ °T rNw NGT w� 9 �r� o' vrir5 �n1 iD � o' r W •e Wb 7yG 1DG iy n' DJ^ rA .. ^NT y � ltinr ^O u n b N 4 r ° •nD P � n^ � m o 0 0 R �O 4. N J n i Y] 6 IW R O N 1 p m ti L �I -IW it nL no- >S +a4r Y.� i 1n Y_ rq rLL•a <c+ NN 'I r11w i4 ins y y"" W 2 ,�. 40 r 1K I rNm �n �r =NiYK W <bn Tr1 Cw .. Y m 14 � n'ST, Oq ni i u Z O �b TSN n p• N J.• �N ;y �r. �NP ��; N, 0�� uNi9 p�Y 7 �v O G O 9c1 1 T �J bO nS rT S. O'�. -il` N10 'f n"NO JNO ^in On R' T d9 l O N N� wr rJ IV .y S nN N = m�.l • =Y] rT. w '1 P .V.. y 'E. iv np N r W N I K= N N V n n b r N N W S P N, d M1 p O S r0 C N N J V < F l O J W O n N T^ V N l Z l 9 N M1OM n Sn J son ^C-� = VN moA fOri j�K N= N Ed l'Ip ZW n0 ^v'i 0 V. N 4 n1K oOa Yn� �Nq ama fl r VS J N T Al. ?e r , S r w N N V Va W S Y .Wi. 410 N rte. _• PO. >TO l ltl N Y = nNrvn W . W 0. = 09, ^ r.AOm K 1 M1b� IF .N.. - °O ,N �0n *.--. �� drW Nom• Fq 0 nJ O 10 �._ WN N N T Nry � n O J O• 4 N = n r= b• O N 2 + •O O N W C n b => N .^+. O a q N C T n P L TK y o o rvn ^ W v w ° O P N n S N = O J 4 N 4. N J n i Y] 6 IW R O N 1 rA 7 N N , p C o^ N r Y b D J b 9 i N N C 6 n n N � D b � > T� u �c N IJ q r O V �2 0. N 2� q N n� raj `S Y W a �.O N O F F o`x _ in N Q n � • a I ,~ N N F c O a 1Y = ro Y I 'e � J nn nb w N c T n C n 1 r¢N Y] n T A� NO o < ro Ti0 r N _ J J N NGN J � r O 7 � T C N n 0.� G •• P •� i O Nf �E Wa �o Yi K •ice ® r, VI A W N •• I„ VI N V T b A W N _< p m ti L �I -IW it nL no- >S +a4r Y.� i 1n Y_ rq rLL•a <c+ NN 'I i4 ins ib s m y"" CC ,�. 40 I rNm �n 9 z •- T J ^6 iYON Cw .. Y m N•n O N, m b r� 7 �v O G O 9c1 1 6 �J bO nS rT S. nI� ^R I �? ti rA 7 N N , p C o^ N r Y b D J b 9 i N N C 6 n n N � D b � > T� u �c N IJ q r O V �2 0. N 2� q N n� raj `S Y W a �.O N O F F o`x _ in N Q n � • a I ,~ N N F c O a 1Y = ro Y I 'e � J nn nb w N c T n C n 1 r¢N Y] n T A� NO o < ro Ti0 r N _ J J N NGN J � r O 7 � T C N n 0.� G •• P •� i O Nf �E Wa �o Yi K •ice ® r, VI A W N •• I„ VI N V T b A W N _< p r�Y r it nL >S +a4r Y.� NPy Y_ rq rLL•a <c+ NN _ i4 ins y"" CC ,�. 40 I rNm �n .O J ^6 iYON N, 7 O 9c1 1 6 Wwb bO nS rT CN nI� ^R I �? d9 N� wr \mG r.b T R S =ILm O .N.. =N O n n '1 P .V.. y 'E. iv np N r I �• n� Y .N. •i=. S r0 C N N J V < F l O J W O n N T^ V N l Z l 9 VN moA W N Ed l'Ip ZW n0 y : N ^ n �Sn >O r VS J N T Al. ?e r N N N N V Va W S Y .Wi. 410 •� \ 00 _• PO. _ N V, „N y.^ = 09, ^ tp r K 1 J r °O u0 a rN �� drW Nom• Fq 0 nJ O 10 �._ WN N Ofl ry, �rb 6r Fn �.d 1IS NN CO R y o o rvn ^ W v w ° , N v w ° Ov M^ �o �o vno 3.• n nR 2- u �j 'a2 N 4 W i9 N 0 01 bO t I) r W^ N W N Y ry ui O m n o T d % O N= = + T O =d ro T ,. ^ N 1a r^ =N Cn N J T.N Cl n n '^ WpN 1 mW n ,N NnC 06 N 3 ,N � a �Y. y .w� b S C n•� p 1 4 w ^an, er N r b u N O b m V N S W N � N m °N V, o 1 N N m n r Z Fo S 7 aP Y] > r q n r� u W N N N 9f S O � P r i 4 N N 6 n w 0 r r ro Y Y N b Y u m m ^Y a N r O' T m C_ N m ° 6 N iN N O � o le. -. x�i T N yn „ N � nJ O b � b O N � ID N N J Y b m s o J S 7 q C Fl C PN N P z�T n e. VC �1 K � W N N N S N O N� C I� _ !N yo b w b J r 4 = N r N N p ry N ern a.N r W N d O a ao y n o •� N d T S \ 6 -e rK„ N 3 O •�10 J C J n = N C T• ;Ya ^_ F (n n V, :1 T WS N r e aQ> Ii N q � r O f n N7 N r Y 6 r. w N �0. er _. N M W .N.. ry = y N ^ N N *YI nio O n _ ^O l nn as O N J u S n N 6 u ry W b N q N . u A C a 6 fY t9 = N N = N ; z Y �n W N d b d N m Mc Ixir O N N , IN r J W O N C. 4 l N A 6 7r n T r. N � N P m l o`q 4 � O t N + = O =KH nw C W n qO Tpr W SN o sw O N T � b w q N N 1 U N r• L 6� N O N O. l P 6.f N � m T Y _ 6 ry N N O ry n N W N r N_ y N W N � O Op N C r a Y 6 N 1.. b M CT E e II .) fJ. an a w ro ld rn s �\ A i r •r = O T� � V} V T N } q O l b p V O, `` Or=iAN Nl Nr dTYO � IJ' +n0 O,�N +I w W V4' - Nldn� Ibl > n n a Iv ^'•c O n m} r -1 r< O O ' I{' Of• •P: �•LO ^ �' l W O W r.0 '� � � m„ .,� PmN D> �+Il [>in r•7 TR u nrOn 6, n0 � � fT � Sk> BNID J n• ONUN Ow�• ] IN 9> r Cs p�.iw 6N r10d JW 'P , K "• G L rl N W T M� r N> r L Ii n 1^ M 4 r -•. � r T N O, ry N N ma'>n °n n• Tuo pi °-%� WAN m oW � I°i.o n .' Iii N 1 'n +d nmNa 'j roa o NLZ >c. ^ Ef ril°.v.Ni wwwi a _� > n °IJ ii mRw M W T+ A = n.rn W � O ••e O O ` � W N w N Op � tNy SI +� VSr n ull Z _r > l V. N b N O w� O N V C N E• Q J [lam N K r w ly nn6 r ^l � N N rJ NN prw 4 S C C. > O V N •+ O lT n> > C 3V r .0 N N n E e II ITEM E' r ---- —CITY OF ItAiNCl-10 Cl O\G--k CG '� 0 ! Y F Zto DATE: June 10, 1981 �3L 1977 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14ENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11663 P.D. N0. 80- 2 - MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A total development of 413 townhouses on 40 acres in the R -2 zone, located on the east side of Archibald, on the south side of Church and west side of Ramona - APN 1077- 341 -01, 1077- 133 -08, and 1077- 631 -03 ABSTRACT- The applicant is requesting approval of a planned develop- ment snd of the associated tentative tract map. The project will consist of 413 townhouse units, to be located between Archibald and Ramona, south of Church. In general, the project meets development and design standards; however, Staff is recommending several modifications Which will effect pedestrian circulation, landscaping, fire access, and recreational facili- ties. Should the Commission concur with these modifications, conditional approval as recommended, would be appropriate. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval of a tentative tract map and a total development package consisting of 413 townhouse untis to be located on about 40 acres of land located between Archibald and Ramona Avenues, south of Church Street (Exhibit "A " ), The project site is vacant, and is not in use at this time. However, there are a number of mature Eudalyptus trees and a Cedar tree located on the premises. The project site is zoned R -2, multiple family residential,, and is designated for nedium density residential (.4 -14 du's /ac) on the City's General Plan. The proposed project density of about 10.8 dwellings per acre is therefore consistent with the General Plan. The project site is surrounded by the following land uses and zoning: LAND USE ZONING Site Vacant R -2 North Single Family Residences R -1 East Single Family Residences R -1 South Single Family Residences R -1 Nest Apartments, Single Family R -'s, R -1, R -3 Residences, Elementary School The project has been reviewed and rated by the design Review and Growth Management Review Committees in accordance with the Growth Management ITEM E' 0 Staff Report TT 11663 (P. D. 80 -12) Ordinance. threshold, addition, Committee, -2- June 10, 1981 The project received a point rating in excess of the required and is therefore eligible for Planning Commission review. In the conceptual grading plan has been reviewed by the Grading and received approval in concept only. ANALYSIS: As rioted above, the project will consist of 413 townhouse units (Exhibit "B "). Each dwelling will have a two -car attached garage, and a private fenced patio. Five basic plans will be available as follows, (Ex!Abits Fl -F5): Unit Height Type Size Plan 1 1 -story 2 bed, 1 bath 936 sq. ft. Pian 2 1 -story 2 bed, 2 bath 1,022 sq. ft. Plan 3 2 -story 2 bed, 23,, bath 1,122 sq. ft. Plan 4 2 -story 3 bed, 21, bath 1,290 sq. ft. Plan 5 2 -story 3 bed, 21z bath 1,450 sq. ft. All unit sizes noted in the table above include living areas only; 400+ sq. ft. garages will also be provided for each dwelling. According to plans, all dwellings will be clustered in rows of 3 -6 dwelli-ng units each., as. follows: Tri -plex 7 (21 units] Four -plex 28 (112 units) Five -plex 2 X10 units) Six -plex 45 (270 units Total: 82 (413 units The main vehicular access point is located on Archibald Avenue, with 2 additional points of access on Ramona Avenue. In addition to the 2 -car garages, approximately 327 additional parking spaces will be provided in open areas and along the project streets and drives, resulting in parking ratiosof about 2.85 spaces per unit, which exceeds the minimum requirement. The pedestrian circulation within the project is comprised by a series of private sidewalks and walkways located throughout the project. However, the 22sign Review Committee is recommending that texturized pedestrian crosswalks be incorporated into the design of the project to connect dwellings with open space and recreational facilities, and that additional walkways be constructed to provide a continuous system. Conditions of ap- proval to that effect have been included in the Resolution for your consi- deration. The main recreational facilities are centrally located and include a swimming pool, spa, 2 tennis courts, and a recreation center. In addition, 2 smaller recreational areas consisting of a pool and a spa are proposed in the northerly and southerly portions of the project. In the southeast corner of the site 11 [71J 11 Staff Report TT 11653 -3- 1` June 10, 1981 the applicant is proposing to construct a temporary retention basin to accomodate potential overflows, and to avoid possible flooding of Ramona Avenue. The retention basin will be fenced, (Staff is requesting that wrought-iron fencing be provided rather than chainlink as originally proposed) and its perimeter will be heavily landscaped. The interior of the basin will be seeded with grass and will be used as a. children's play area. If, at some point in the future, a master planned storm drain is constructed in the vicinity of the project and the need for the retention basin is eliminated, 8 additional dwellings (units no. 406 through 413) could be constructed and sold by the Homeowners Association. The use of the retention basin as a childrei-.'s play area will provide a reasonable use at this open area when not used for retention purpcses. However, such facilities are temporary. Therefore, Staff is recommending that additional children play areas be provided elsewhere in this project, According to the submitted plans, the applicant will be providing a sub- stantial amount of landscaping along Archibald Avenue, which has been designated as a Special Boulevard (Exhibit "'C "). Structural setbacks along Archibald will be kept to a 351 minimum, with the average setback exceeding 40'. The setback area will be heavily landscaped and the existing mature Cedar tree will be preserved. Along Ramona Avenue, standard striccturai setbacks of 25' will be provi'e.d.. However, the appli- cant is proposing to construct private patios, bounded by wails not to exceed 42" in height, within the 25' setback area along portions of Ramona. Avenue frontage. Along the westerly boundaries where the proposed development abuts the existing apartment complex and school, the landscape plan indicates a minimum of 15 feet of landscaping, including a substantial number of trees. However„ the Fire District is requesting that 15 foot wide fire lanes be provided along these boundaries, eliminating all trees and shrubs in the process (Exhibit "B "). Staff has reviewed this alternative withthe Design Review Committee, and concluded that the total elimination of landscaping in these two critical areas is not acceptable. It is recommended that the size: plan provide a minimum of 10 feet of landscaping, including shrubs and trees, at these locations, and that other alternatives of fire access and protection be explored with the Foothill Fire District. The Design Review Committee also reviewed the building elevations and architectural design of the project and was very satisfied with the style of the buildings and the amount of detailing incorporated into the design of the patio walls (Exhibit "D "). Color renderings and elevations of these buildings will be available for review and comment at the Planning Commission meeting. Attached is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. AVA Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the Environmental Check- list, and found no significant adverse impacts or the environment that could occur as a result of this project. The issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. Staff Report TT 11663 -4- June 10, 1981 CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was placed in the Daily Report newspaper,, In addition, approximately 195 public he -ring notifications were mailed to the surrounding property owners. Several property owners in the single family tract to the east have discussed this project with. Staff to cl;irify the design of the project. No specific objections were filed or voiced. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed Planned Development and Tentative Map, and condu_t a public hearing to consider all public comments. Tf, after such hearing, the Commission concurs with the attached findings and proposed conditions of approval, a motion to adopt the attached Resolutions of approval, with conditions, would be appropriate. Res ctful y submitted, _R K. HO� �r C yty Planne RKN-.OK:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit 118-1" - Phasing Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Exhibit "C -1" -• Conceptual Landscape Exhibit "D" - Typical Elevations Exhibit "E" - Recreation Building Exhibit "E -1" - Recreation Building Exhibit "j'•I - Typical Six -plex Exhibit "F -1" - Floor Plan 1 Exhibit '°F -2" - Floor Plan 2 Exhibit "F -S" - Floor Plan 3 Exhibit "F -4" - Floor Plan 4 Exhibit "F -5" - Floor Plan 5 Exhibit "G -I." - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "G-2" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "G -3" - Tentative Tract Map Initial Study - Part I ResolutiGr:: of Approval Conditions of Approval Plan Enlargements Elevations Elevations Part I - Part II - Part III E., CI SITIE UTMIY_ATCON MAP OWMl11 /DfVlLO�l11 •'�•• eMtlIM!!p TRACT MID.IIS63 ....... our.c..r ewa ........... wv.. o. uuraww... t L.....�> • —y a -aj - "'i00TNILL 801 a� ._q �, •1 k C-2, wn; z-1 TRAMT moo. iom =63 all _r 1 .. .0 c•c. o ••rc.• cruru.u• �^ � -) � r �8TY crwr.. o. r.r .. u.rw.w. a.•w• u• uu.ewwrw, 1••-� 6 I j==-- O110ilCT bC61bMC�1 ilft J '_ i { {'i I�. \F b!�1•YNae:H ¢�IJOO1Y.n i AMOCtAiM ! T 1 �� Y.L�{ {{11 LCOAI nULCN1�4tONe � �Jbcr r1 r' ..,r_ .- ,t��:.. 4 lffl I_ _...._ _ � ..�14 •L,. `�.. �'� w rJ �1J (r r �11•_ -'..�� w w�l.. `� ti.__. rte-' y 71 rr e - - �I �I M..•.... r w- -a- —• A� r�� I �rA' B`- -[rtifl(1�4j+.�.I ({•�" rat— S -•�- c,r,�•` Tj- __ice .V '"-Y r � .. ^' 1 ` t f, r} .• r w rUL �.�1`-��. I � '/" rT �1 fI'- I I-t ;% •✓ � \ ,�i'V'( 4 I ni ..... ? .M 14 � � Irk• Sf E DATA _- .._.. -. `�- �Y rte (�J��,`. -�•'� -yl. wi- ant Cf .11 r- "L,•�'..' - I i.1,n� i G' � _ ,., i �' rt E'.:C %ln�...`.:.'.': ". „,.'^ ^ °..... ......... ..... ._....�•.,�.c.. •` ��:�- •r[' • ��^- 'tom— �4��1� ,� 4:. ti D PHASING PLAN •- r�-- ._._.�� TENTATIVE IVE "I'lGlACT' NOL a :SS3 ru c•r• sr eeYCYe cece aneen, C III•. OV \I•e ee YYYY1•e \. \tYrY 1I CYYIIee 'A. O��MN//611 /DryzLOPM.k_ — pM61R!!N 11 a � IwPItlC •N� I�F.11L bR1QIrTiONs � / L PMCN MAN W _p II 11 C � Tr � F� A It��_ � 0.11. IsJ It 1,•�_ A t i 11 n., 1 �1 q� 4 f� CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN - TENTATIVE TRACT NO-11663 • C... .. . ..O . ..... < c r o u. ........... .... or u... u.w... OM'f[LVD4\'C19�1R ��gMppSCwAE NR�1l R'ECT M l W iW.M „'= 4�„��-�'^.? din- ';� =i-•� �, 3 L~w.- _ ✓ww.M .rwn. �Y.rt w1C +�- C1��.LLMM!�VYS � /. •G�iy nraw...o .� •1 �. � +wr w-�-ry .,..r....e.: .�iw i ` w-,J NNw.� Lv-• v :+•r4.n0 F +rr _. v ••.. ... N. wrwr.. mrrsr - r,.n,. .�•.......w r.e.•.l I �� • � <I.H.14 O�y_.lO..r CI — .�.w12 �1:: art. ^_- •- �r -'..- ^+ _ _!� _Y�• -- ^.iwr rC' T I _f AQw :raw n ��• � ' -an m..nri. j e = 'r6..Srs I or c I 17 *I A CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAP2%CLARGEME TMTATIVM .,;rF*ACT V40.11663` ........ ..... .. euo.uu. LAN21reM AMCM"l=V Lua—zg= - 3 del 00 hc 2 (11•,e) ,—. T-n Ala 7 j � 4-p AO '�� uIIW1UFt �•' 1r�7,�I e • GAS 'mil 7 1 � �' 4: � .'�1 •I• �� T �:__ �� ,fir lutf..• a n. �''..,,, A .Y 1 _ � ":S •rr� t'1 WIII l lay �, i •of ��' " ,- �sl � t \, ,IC I•: , ,� ((('''��.+++i! �I n,.1-J —J 1'1 11 I �- I' .L( 1 1_9 J J t • •` „ 171 1 �L w II 1 � rs " I •' � I �� Imo. I ' D IL �1 1 . t T'. •. � ' 1 t 1 ��I' I y r r.. C , r `I; I A � 1 �41iM " I •' � I �� Imo. I ' D IL �1 1 . t T'. ( 1 lls" i,. I If 0 I ) 1L:1 �^II V'r 5 )r I'. '1A �r r� n_ i,. 0 ) x Il f1� VA yn hl I f - rl i1 I 4 r 1Vy, o' f I I y ` t, t•1, 1. if 1 'I" MIMI, o i ne ir—``'�'� • v.. '` �� •� /� CI J S . 5 ! I n •�tynhr... V l3 j � p� �I � •.p 1 h '9 o I I� I O � I . w •1 I' 1�1 b I W ( w 3 41 Id A VZAZ 0 - �i'1 Ell ei!ii viv I 2 =" Fp .y � I Q L�m I i I . � I Lyra$ Y 1 <r — l f eJ •'� ' tj, l 1 . 1• s Y�F Q 3 aLj-' r I f � c �ti f ; �IeF; 6 0 v. tip, rs.,.'7F d A ! y to gn t C Y•c' >:i'L��P ! � iSL_5 y =. Y V s° Y V x ilYl I 2 =" Fp .y � I Q L�m I i I . � I Lyra$ Y 1 <r — l f eJ •'� ' tj, l 1 . 1• s Y�F Q 3 aLj-' r I f � c �ti c =[4 ; �IeF; v. tip, rs.,.'7F d A ! y to gn t C Y•c' >:i'L��P ! � iSL_5 y =. Y V s° Y V I 2 =" Fp .y � I Q L�m I i I . � I Lyra$ Y 1 <r — l f eJ •'� ' tj, l 1 . 1• s ^I e 5 " �n I 3 of Z 111 POP i E �. j! I fie j in U C _Ir � '!1,S�d�1 J° .�•F•1 a L a n ¢ M < 99 lTr' Q 3 Ir � f � ^I e 5 " �n I 3 of Z 111 POP i E �. j! I fie j in U C _Ir � '!1,S�d�1 J° .�•F•1 a L a n ¢ M < 99 lTr' Q 3 tip, rs.,.'7F d A ! y C Y•c' >:i'L��P ! � iSL_5 1 0 e + Z f7 1 u7� +! fl C3!,I zz IPZ F_. q_ tlpi�t LU pppp�� - 0 o: :- l: ala- 11-C L449 W- F� I �! I I 7 "•I 1 J I • fl I i , I I w a �a 6. ►.J E ElI L t , `• - R r rw it _L3 ° - -- p O i rJ _ .i �' !' � 14 00 1.�., P � -. ,, °' :nom •Y t1 f y }� 1 �. 1 ...+' -^ it •-1f . 'J �"1.Y . � a .L:- t. \ r� O C.p_L J L'. 1 � •1 i; e! W i:..:- ;- Iq "• • `Y to - • V ® O O _ V 1 V 1 t2 y v H„1 V = cc W 1r[1�. � • I •O - V i; e! i 3 fiAR 4r�j t'7�7 ;- Q "• • `Y ]iiiiii 7 v 1 i 3 fiAR 4r�j t'7�7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET — T) be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee:, $90.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this' form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee *_hrougq the department wberr the Project application made. Upon receipt of this application, the environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and tare action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project wile have no environmental impact and a Negative Declarati.nn will be filed, 2) The project will have an imvironnental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepar<a, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tract 11663 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Ma_ rlborough Development Corporation, 2029 Century Park East Suite #1550, Lams Angeles, CA, 90067, (273)553-5131 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CON!rACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Paul Byrnes at Marlborough Development Corporation, 2029 Century Park East, Suite _ #1550. :.os Anaeles• CA 9nn67_ VOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NCB.) Assessor Panels 1677 - 331 -08, !077- 341 -02 E 1077- 631 -0" LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STtsTE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND TOE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Building Permit from City of Rancho_ Cucamonga Sewer and Water Permits from Cucamonga County W -ter District - I -• I E 4 ; PROJECT DESCRIPTION r] DESCRIPTION IF PRO.TECT : Ter, at i ve Tract 11663 is a 413 -un it towr fihme project on 39 acres on a cleared site. All utilities are immediately _ adjacent to the project. The project also contains recreation amenities to provide internal sourze of recreation. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING &TD PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 39 acres DESCRIBE THr ENViR0NP1EVTAZ_SETTTNG OF THE PROJECT -j-'TE INCLUDING INFORYA' 'IOIQ ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TRFES) , ANIMT,LS, ANY CUI.LTURAM, HISTORICAL OR SC A'IC ASPFCTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY t::ISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The site was formerly an orange -,rove tnat has been cleared for sever.l ey ars._ A specimen pine tree was saved and will be incorporated into _ 'the pr�4ct. There ore no cr +itural, historic or scenic aspects. The site is surroundcd by multifamily and single family projects, except for the school in the south. is the project, part of a larger project, one of a serieej of cumulative actions, which although individually small,', may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No z- 2 � - "y'... -..- -rte... - •.- - ^- ---... WILL MIS PPOjECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in g ground contours? X Z. Create a substantial. change in existing noise or vibration? , X 3- Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (po)ice, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal )f potentially hazardous materials s•ar_h as toxic substances, flammable- or e:(,;-'osives? Explanation of any YES answers above: _ Property wi i 1 be rezoned widening- — - IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page_ CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the r.ttachad exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evallation can be made by the .Development Review Committee. Date_ /Z%2.9 /BCC %3 Signat e AM Title Director of Planning & Enginearinc, r RESIDE11TIAL CONSTRUCTION l AOL The folio-wing information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Tentative Tract 11663 . Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Marlborough Development Corporation Specific: Location of Project: East of Archibald. South of Church West of RamonaT� North of Foothill. PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PRASE 4 TOTAL 1. N inner of single family units: See Attached Schedule 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begir, construction: _ 4. Earliest 'late of occupancy: Model and u of Tentative S. Dedroons Price Rance 1� 1 co 1 � O ^� N M �O 1 co N O co 1 � O M M QI t 6Z m Ot cm Ol m O, a+ 0 m m I , 1l: � c W co /b C1 m N M co co O cn cn 01 Oa% \. _ Ol 1 O1 OI O1 W CO T O Z T N � O Im ice• C'� CO Qti Ol •� N N 10 - 4- 7 1 C.O u Ip ti H O O O u i) C E O I L N rtl CC s F-' L� W Z O N N N D W W d •r Z O W .n C Cl N ID Cl uj 1 1 b Q 2^ 137 L 'o 0� 1 1 V- 0. C 0-0 .— N M M M QI t 6Z m Ot cm Ol m O, a+ 0 m m I , 1l: � c W co /b C1 m c O .1 N co co OOi cn cn OOl Oa% \. _ Ol O� O1 OI O1 W cv = N T N to N Im ice• C'� CO Qti Ol c O .1 N co CO Ol T O1 Ol O1 \. _ Ol O� O1 OI O1 N W = N 1, O m O In 1� q CO CI Ol c O .1 N co co ON O^ O1 M OOi \. _ cn mMcl T Ol <71 W N = N N LO m m O 1-I 1%- co CO Of c O .1 N co 6b OON cn QI � cn \. _ T O1 T Ol m N CO = N N LO m m O I` r\ 1` co cn c O .1 N co Ol O1 Ol m Q1 \ \ (n cn m O) 471 CO N = N C0 N tp N 10 •NI 0-1 c O .1 1 n•. !A Q J J M 2 � O —SOW I•- m C7 V J M 1' N H � 11 El N 4- U O O Of .- = N TJ C1 4p •NI J •� N N 10 - 4- 7 1 C.O u Ip ti O O O u i) C E I L N rtl m O L� CL C CI O_ O N N N M M W d •r .a C E R N I 1 1 1 1 40 V L 'o 0� 1 V- 0. t o O 0-0 .— N M sp• In D. Z- 1 n•. !A Q J J M 2 � O —SOW I•- m C7 V J M 1' N H � 11 El E u RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -12 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -2 TO R -2 /RD FOR 40 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AND RAMONA AVENUES SOUTH OF CHURCH STREET - APN 1077 - 341 -01, 1077 - 133 -08, 1077 - 631 -03 WHEREAS, on the 31st day of December, 1980, an application was filed and accepted on the above described project; and WHEREAS, on the ]Ott, day of June, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following— fl gs: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The Proposed Planned Development would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed Planned Development is in conformance with the existing and proposed General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project w 1 not creete a significant adverse impact on the environment znd recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on June 10, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Sect•lon 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucan,anga hereby recommends approval on the 10th day of June, 1981 ,Planned Development No. 80 -12. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 80 -12. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 4. All Conditions of Approval applicable to Tentative Tract No. 11663 shall apply to Planned Development No. 80 -12. IN 7.7 El LJ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11663 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11663, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Marlborough Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a subdivision for a total development of 413 townhouses on 40 acres in the R -2 zone, located on the east side of Archibald, on the south side of Church, west side of Ramona - APN 1077- 133 -08, and 1077- 631 -03 into 437 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on June 10, 1981, and WHEREAS, the City Planner subject to all conditions set forth Divisions reports; and has recommended approval of the Map in the Engineering and Planning WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11663 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Resollitior No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11663, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. Site and landscape Plans shall be revised to accommodate a minimum 10' wide landscape buffer along the westerly boundaries of the project adjacent to existing school and apartment complex. Such revisions shall be subject to approval by both the City Planner and the Foothill Fire District, prior to final map recordation. 2. A continuous looped pedestrian walkway shall be provided along all interior boundaries of the project. 3. Three permanent children play areas shall be incorporated into the design of the project. Precise location of such facilities shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior to final map recordation. 4. The temporary retention basin /play area shall be fenced with a 5' high wrought iron fencing, and its periphery shall be heavily landscaped. A lawn or other appropriate ground cover shall be installed and maintained within the fenced area. 5. The design and intensity of architectural detailing of all structures and patio walls shall be in substantial compliance with submitted elevations. 6. CC &R's for this project shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior to recordation. ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. A soils and geological study regarding the effect of ground saturation due to the storm retention basin on the foundation of the existing adjacent house and any suggested mitigating measures shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to recordation of the map. E 11 ICJ Resolution No. Page 3 El 2. An on -site and off -site drainage study for the project shall be provided to the City Engineer for review prior to recordation of the map. After review of the study, the City Engineer reserves the right to determine requirements of construction, reconstruction or alteration of on -site storm drainage system to his satisfaction. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 1981. PLANNING COYIMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary vf the Planning Commission I, JACK, LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that t:;e foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a, a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of June, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r; •1 LJ v O HQ"^ PTV Y J A LNNNL N Lw o ^ N Py Y r T � ._ L w o V N I U V O N O L V N �� LOL yVT.•A.C`• Y V •Vi 4 b J %rn }Y V O "• d GL y GLO cni y en Z wPC ?PO b N ii f•6 u A C A A N j b u.•.^ V N Pliwbb y q OTV Ot ` V •O. ^ C4 L qa T In O L �I1 •� N u d L n6 C • M LC^ r . V � �. W n N L• Gq O � r .• n J G V LN O` y V• O qqI n 1•'rf� ba` -,G „6 bG buVE iti .'°I 6 V b✓f yG. NC N^ •-• qY bT V Y LN V > M� ^ W q C. ^ y W q O EL u L O W C W N V V q u G � iE • d }t q G l 1 •LV' �Q• -V L O• b � EI � W W � � O u L •� m N O _ .p _^ N .(p. N G� V 6 W. � A L N V S N ^ V C � > Y L w N a y n C •� p. Y V p N4 YV N 6 y CuOd _ .� C 1'b I� L qr n y .In "L 9 " L y d L y D V J L •J NIA $ Y^ O. 6? N r nNtr tj N N '• NOA q L V nA 4N CV VO Y W T 6 LOY� vn qV 1 qV lw u.•'• CV 7N N9 dv e r bY. ^O yN gViO Cp u •p' Wa •NniO N nu �b Yil Jd MM Y x �GyW AS C t V� ~LrLV � AT •9 J «�G •Gr y Z V p qy rAO a V .N �•� •-O. NG+ b Y r � ('� C •L d' C Y � r rnJ a W W•O.•N� q .p uJ.ibJ M N� u O. Sr pS b tj n bNV• WTY lltL lu ai n �]�l W CM VO- N T O d Y � g V N b L a a L 1�VV U L('n OOl1 n• dV r. (' L > nV �� qw Cb A� N LO N j n'Gyy��V• L V. NlL Lr `V Wu�V >�.i C q V O t q dY V •• .�LY.G C n V L b\. •. G p.0 11 V N y N O b d d u S V 6 q N' L r b N d a N•^ U N W nI! N Y y!J r A•� q i T q•^ I'] y n Lpy M L O• 1]�CO T•u _ CC V• L y� n€ �r • yr OC N OC nVVrgV YO.. •.•N TT V� qW CT ^•00V• � wLiS V> /fA NV; ur• U O rV CJ C/�y' �� iu T c yy •L.+ ` 4b �g �o,� ONU �b•^py noo Nn6 pT yb �,w d•V T �G .OjV` O hL J N q V V^ V n C y •fV. V q d C q w 6 N f u A� �� W O i O L PM r y_ •3 S p V u NLN q q rb ANq V r•� L u Nu Y ... N NV N w QW Nn 4q C VOIO l•I Qw Ld y Wy LS P O [. yp yO l� lV y L V Y O •” q HL Vfw JMMAaL �O' W vfy V u uV• L d G L V y G V O N L W �YI W 4N eR N O Y Y r x O x 6 C. a H O V K a •• C C u A O d L V a 6 Y N 6 1 q O L n w O V 0 V L w d L V S M H w O HQ"^ PTV Y J A LNNNL ^ N Py Y r T � L w o V N r q O N LOL yVT.•A.C`• }4�G O V W b J %rn }Y pAC N ou�aw GL y GLO cni y en Z wPC ?PO �C N ii f•6 u A C A A N A O e N b l�.� O V "�OUti•p iY V OTV Ot V •O. ^ C4 L qa T In O L �I1 •� N u d L n6 C • +J LC^ S V J v y O q •ti W WN A ba` -,G bG buVE iti .'°I 6 V~ Y �n O2I.r LNU in�L N^ •-• qY bT V Y LN V Y y M� ^ W q C. ^ y W q O EL u L O W C W N a L O• G � iE • d }t q G l 1 •LV' b V EI 't, ^Pr.6 C'O r10 q � 5 _ 9 _^ N N • N O� d u� V 6 V V •. . o N C`„ � N W V[;w N n V �p C L 1 -LVauN Y QO 6 a0 6 y W _ .� L p/ I� L W m ^ T � GLO cni y v Z �C V C4 L qa T yY ('� C • +J LC^ l WN � L ^q' LL 6 V~ Y ` q „N q'•�N CV •W qY bT V Y LN V W M� ^ W q C. � W q O 4 n q a L O• pG � iE • d r q L q G l •LV' b 5 _ _ _^ N iE L Y u rG- W V �p C V •- W 6 y .� L p/ I� L W VT WN Y^ yC A'^ L Ow V nA 4N CV VO p • wN Lwb LOY� vn qV 1 qV lw u.•'• CV 7N N9 dv e r bY. ^O yN gViO Cp u c02 Wa •NniO N � '-C MM GO ^P 11d WN tl AS C t V� ��J d' b a• ?N a V •9 J «�G •Gr V01 qr Z V p qy rAO a V .N ryO �Ctf NG+ b Y r � ('� C •L d' V Y � r a b J 'J + C U O. Sr VG �J^ d••V• Vl" bNV• WTY N� GN •CV. Y �]�l W CM Vr �NOV VnT� O y^ rY � WC 'V r6 F� NC U L('n OOl1 O dV r. (' L Vb � Ov0 aN L�r •qb V O G ^qq` ^O b\. 6 9 P O 11 V N b d c W W u G q r a n qn q C OC ^N rJn TT �W qW CT ^•00V• >•O N T c yy u�L �o,� r fia noo I'o Po ViC� �� LN6 YO NLN ^� ANq 1.6 cO V 0;; 0 N N� P L' L P O q l� V Y O •” q b rn ^ L V u uV• L d G L V y G V O N L W W b= p 6 O N p C{(I p VN `n +. •..• b4ry bVC �"� <L bqc '-GM }u L1`V VY wVV u r nN CC� [emu [_W NJO W N j. �1 O A S C� n•. p W c_ ^G�•b O L •• Z FN N� D: � VrY 1-4: FYN QV DLO. ^N } •C ••G.q 6uV VLVJ QON N CVO• F•L.�L L. O � � CI PI OI q. W N 1 � • • � � Y t ` O N N A q_ S PLn O V n R V C N q _ N ` C N A LSO 4 J P _2 L Y' L C ✓ R L u h C A o L > C+ O n yy. D R V � q _ p CN✓J w N a N�a 0 N Z N w W Y P. A v w .L, d q k S �6 D V a O n u d e q y6 W d v O l r. w e � G w O L L o C � n Y L b A C n V c u q V b q CI O c ✓ V .W- LN v .� c v L 9 R V a ` ✓ q W CT ✓ � N A O way y C V S A C4a-� PO � LNd W O.r d N V C q V U N Y V• Lei C q N• �i •i L O:q C Q P � � O Fa v } N q M a raJ d � � P AVM q PC Ham C CEW r, c uic M � G d n a al L a u P 4 Y/ Fj. S N L V u W C O 6 Dq L J r' 6 n q E L V q V W E L N C`VL - V a C M o`w la^ ° C � V F,;aN �m- O irM i L V Cl O NCL N C L a 4 WAN E C •- aLo f0]LL v c can. P� T«� 6 L D �J d •LnL O ✓ Y V C V J r N L - i .L•r q « L L 6 Lq ^E �N C d .N- > u L Ly w F L LpP 4°• O^ N ON Noo C C C LqT J C 6 m N 0 p A a r a rn C Y l q O N m ° -C « O qw« L« L O 4 Y- N O C aqL O O Na CJ L ✓ 'a V L L N✓ N N om Vi o v E c L J N a a� vN N cL r0 L C O O N N >dN V uN dni c F L yN C O�P r °Y C Nty q Cr R ORY bN� U •d 0.°i L V O • vVi L.•. u N WNr �sE n P ` c F.agr � n u V Pn4 .i.GO q « l N V 4 L T h doa} t E d O u Pqd 6 C v (LE q+ 'Q nw O u N n b ° °L ✓d L « W O i� n Y O V L N^ u q n L L N C M .0 {V{JJ L « n p Z N'^ L•GLJ/s _ 4 YV 6 uCYUOyw.L N V C_ .� N u L V Y �•r V' I y U u O L •O V C V N « un u? q V l O� � q 4.SU^ CCV VO Lp yN. L. O C.n V y l•.0 L. oc � °� tJ 'yro,'y o.� Nvvu c•« .°.. ftL lW O O u O4 9dJ el m N}GC C L L E J O L J c✓o v wN cnY.� x ✓[" rue C<1C oL ° c cv u.l •^ 10 L L •i ✓ d q ��I••••, •• • V i• W «[" YL • •fl J4 i LyJi .r'L'O ✓L.r q�T L 4r0- i NN D LO V4 i w� JY` n' 6 N X N W _ Y. C � O q .. � L W L P �✓ 1 L ' n Cu O'.V. O.••• C ^LC LY-Y W•- L �✓V C O•(c -,WiaL TO TV 1' • &0, O, ryCry Ly V L N N * NyN. A !' 1y404V q CN O y° V[{+«• •°-L~• 4 NN} N b� g4nTUw•pG y� rJ « P_ pvY V O N •- U J W P A C a L t N O a n L. O FTT N Vi ✓ H•n 30 O O 1"'X✓ !^4N NO 6D.. -V X_NO ILY U W E •� o Y ° � > p o � v pN L pW [1LWO C •.O �4L-�NW �L q8_ ^ 4 ` V_L N.pG •� C .11Oq O:dn h`+• D Ra N f!G 6L NG i' ~ A _ V O q C •- NY/ ~ V NR�V_ r R« .•QL ° !! N O N Vy _ q N.^L MC4 ~O: h' N M1 P L d R V 9 U T✓nN✓JWVC CJO F V FC 6.G }i •- N R L. C •- C L > r X N R O l 01 W V A d Y V. V L a u pl O. l C V O N J [: rr ••• W° D C X O. O L V � V 4 h c• C L 1 y• V W O O •- L + T n V � GOA L y O •- M T[' Ea•�M_� Nq v e p .N Wno n o C W YJ N q �• Y L i V V N L O q u 'd o.- L- a •^o `v G^ � q .°• < W N u T � K T q� } .L.. d R d � J .L•• w0. q Y j L p W+• L V V PO L' 1!M 4. P✓ W •� o o. vc • -ai.NC ao aMirP qC�P a'..i AN4 CN dL .L-(�J � y._q. i- CVJA nW•^ _ 6 N d M •u .r C _ N O „ N J O O'C L. q Y: R �p .n °� c.Nr: wqu :+ ✓.-u .N•.�m �✓ dL4 °`or Puy On.L 4••L^COCUTpu �qw r°� acv °b n� }m L'}L}•. dD ¢c °D. c °N' nL w ere u7i YN Ncw.�PPt u« uc� m° o« „�vNJ'. mrn L o �v n ...•q o� cY u N L E Fnv v rmi rncmi Na la - �i'�d ci ��` V d Eru C �W✓ vri LRV. d •JV« ry r r-iiJ .•mac c R bC+ LV AL ¢�O S+NO ^.-NN O.« O N VV.- ✓.�rCiw q� a L NG q «r i u� -o N a ci. o.. -.+ n a q^ G N CD •ci.= P4 LVV 6 S li��K 'n L•^ NV yb ..- .c aN✓ u „V` 14 „i liar > }WgVC _ X Ei Nun C •� O_ _ ° ` A b: yNI u Y N •- < C ^ W y ••J C W .1 L _ L _ G N C q L L' V V C] L ` C «'m L .•C. .^ [•1 AT N} «nOL AL N• •n y n Z ML �4q« «P UON ."Y iC ' N N« V Gl d W ✓ <I ✓ u rJ ^ 9 N .M . [r � C > .^ C .•. •- l:: •� O v: y V✓ V � 4 N L C C L . .- C W TAD « •� N j.• C 4 P lJ 4 N S V 1• � J` C N q� T p M 4 G ` L_ V V� A N C :C •� C W N N: fj •-6 Cn [•CN ^� ^XN` N «CO✓ D • C C 04 C- '�Vm ^C • -M+• Nq d LA.0 -Y L.•• c. uEl ^M rani c_�u O N «-. a..:u� o•qE e.q N V N N [L1 q !i ✓ W O ` ^ t' q C .• ` Y .� 7 Y L « -• M ^ g ,l'. h •• Y p l l •J •r « V J N^ l L L n C T � G "•- e� C 4a W W V O'•«« O V. qV N C O• RV R PRN N t;� 0a C(: p6 � LDI � � � � 9I 1 ♦ 1_ u N Q W L 0 N L • r H N q P Y ... r ✓ C J 4 A a O T m 4 E L'' ^E � O cdV • O CC WbO� ply F �_ L _V 6 •O P J •L.. U ry Pr � N 4 ` u y y{ .^ P A j a N L' .] J N d i _ 1G ^ A � p N E d Y C C Y S O •.. u « � N •'- U L - .r.r dP i•,r RuO.V Y ✓ .may � - ✓ ?Iq V V i, C ° V •. O N � W w L N y 1. N >. L � v N ^ 0. y0. !, � L W u•J N wW AC yN ^ qL • -d-CO O' qU WOV ^L W ` `M N V � `✓ u PY ...r d V O� !J N � O 2 � u O.O LI O' O � !.• L N V v l � ✓ E V �� ° V m J �•C^.Wi SVOi Orb ..O Y +! t �N nNL Ti CTt,N C,�W t. �..• �rV w.NO` T. W {- •I� 7C y'Ld Oi V6 TOyi u NV> C�V, v. -4. ^N� ESN ut COL Z uNy T � �V �1 ` a f. P �1 Cpp'' � a P C LI L [Y, N C O r p •Q R W^ W L L u .u1� � .� �p L W Wr T 'y^ d JLY LuA 'Op L P` N} A } T W ^• iy � La• Y u N WL6 Ou` VN uY .. rWOtl4 °lP L�R�+� LNy ENO ^E ` yL V V r Vm m W C W ^ P > L Y O' d uqi Vs O T G L N >. �« H r✓ C p .j V J L u u y O y C E V V } O dC•_. d N ^ _.°. iNA •O.rN CL'LLq 0. G � PA WC'NY n Y i1Cq 4N9 NN4Ln AOO � uN K qF L L L NNY LNq Vpl dT ✓WP L dNG .-mi yy �Orn LV �9 Y'� \° e� rn m ci= ^ _ AT Wu W ^� � anJ U'O L••.�•.L. LnL dOUOd '^ IT WA 1naN GV A� O09 O 'r ..W.LO nd✓P^ AO nLLTO✓ .. .0 �^ ^ Oo4 L n°C °CL, 2:3 aNG Lfi 4wf yyi Y. r Goy Oqu 1`V •N nIA V1.0 O NN..C.0 O �U i 4YW. .Wr t0 n[ T L d` O _ A L- V Yi N L V L W T 1: N^ f' O •� Y. •"' N R U pq\r .LW TYVO.L_ V.rO OVI V.Ci�LAPA LN ✓ OpVU P •O OV u N V_ ^ W r� A C ..0. u p m u W= E L 'G Y. u N a: K Z O ....^ ..� 4 •1� p d TC. .r N N..0 pCp��OY Yp4L V V O. W d u ✓u � ^Ti] q a.Nn r °a✓ IccN d0y ✓° _m -°-.LO �° L•im VVL^ Lw JinJ N ..Y. RL.. N S L nYgC ^� �(/•L" 6NL L LIYYN- WY✓ Nt �Jr1^y. .' 0.}O Yl .Oi�L' W 1J lW.)d � d O NVL n7i V.�•� L 4.J p00 �N� C Bpi Lq COd Cu` >W V V w r Y W. 6p ✓' R u ✓ W O E L} n S^ -0 � N° W E 1L. S N' ^ C ^ •' C C'O C q .- C W P i L� N_ •}� � „ C„ { 'O p .^ 4 y ° u Y. i P J n A 1'• q q •. � � ^ \rVa� °.0 aNi✓ PfG }n =y `Vp wdi �..C. t._ O1mL O°'V ( ^.yam U 7 A N L W NLi O L •. y,-O. � O L .^ L N ft 4 V N W O W d N y ^ O d •� yl N N O L �^ G � •^ C p f, n P�� P q N N LT✓ L°U N._ C PVC L r� •• PC_ .nO VS GPw 0.L tl CC.LLUU .COL^ OL .�-„• Q ytC p L Vi �'qL +C•V.�d .^N � 4r> V NOY QVL OJ�tiR tL A. •••Y WNL O � A ✓� n OV yY4 N [: O L• 6 N U= O M r 3 •-° x N _ N n ._. O C •_ O N n O C ✓ 7 G p CFO «a� L Kr]i .rn � vT c a'W'p rTa. L o =4 bu w_L..°_ - c °✓ ae.= ° uv.N,. vT. o. i. .^-nJ vv= `c y�4ronaJ, w•'O QUy NGW ro�T Pl4.r _q'J '� ^L ^N i^ a .`•L V V ✓ ^ k 0 d V Y yE+ t LL' S 4 P V C VT1 • L 0. N N O d• L d N Y G O ✓/ •> . V W V V b ^` O y 4 d N_- O_ ✓_ nJ 4 P L N P p U a V A✓ (: G g A r i. G ° C n O r W L O .n. Y� ✓� L. ✓ p CI N A V A y fC. ^' L'' '•' �, V V `` ^QLA nOY %` SN]G =„ VPL Y. OV•\r" J «fl YA�4d p..V. •L✓ ° •gip y AO. o ' Q�.p ^C WAN 4.NpV ?W {d ^Y aL• CVV W V ^V.r^r y O1N ^ ^ C VyU} S`•O{ °N OAJ O «Y N6 pN `[ d '^ E O L y L •^ u L �. j O V A N � ~ U W W N qT. O !P O d T,(` ..V. ✓ V_ p E P G r 7 •WAL �VUC IC ✓La VYY OIW SL .O� w NW O +' LN Lti _` ¢�- aN� ✓C ✓ °0. N °C �uq l W y ^v QUO L ✓..WNC Gu dW P CI q •°r^ V.°- y` L C' u L ^ N .'n � u V A p d O � U ^.•' N W P q-� W A A W` P � « } N W W u pp YAC, ^V.N+G.L^ N2 •- ..T.TY ONW a•.L.0 L�LLLN Iu. .�C p L NU VY.. � F:� +aNO RI'.WnNq uGd qq.•G. NbC OW pCI .•0..��1W 007.•• ^ i WC VO Y� L u`. N. V S 4� T u{ c W W y N C N L` ✓ N n y. ._ E A �Yd V•^V4 N°>; Tc�a. Ate.°.° K .°:. ^°' .°.J ^� F °i «LLiy E ° «LLi r p° pLGY� 6° Cu w-�" ) ^. °'.`. p•rV .nc L.°. ° Nnq NNN iN�\:N ryrngw >. i �E " "N `•. t°v O G .0 •+ O C V N L U U a A L. L OI ..N.', n V r ^ P'^ 2.2 L L c u✓• W J n p N P d A l✓ C .4- K N � u •T•i u j O E P « C W O = u O V fi L T a�^ V^ ^ d. � 6 r J u« W L .I [F u L pO�u N.N.n 6m�0 C <I�S ON•n O PON 1A ?q^.� O Ap L W✓ •�J O cuiry L T +u N_d F2S YcN CVV.r Yu•Ni .+a a ud L LI 'L^• v0 WC. OCO.O. .Od �p....L ✓A `O `'] >.VN ^W^ A N TY Way n C •C O_ d.r L u W �� L C u u V (j O t O N O 2• V ^ L. .... V d O rq ♦ ~ G y l^ •. ✓ p � L y. u N ✓} K A„ .� S u' Y�{ V m ^ N O U T F� � u W � u T � I Z` ^.°r N Y L° T V y S] O: O p L � C O n� m� N Y=• A ^. ^- L y u R N •^ L V N N N 1/TI f• ` ,n L V N V C p L N � � E6y�.r N.Or�Lp.SF NWUU� NLCi F ✓C.^W N•,V \C.l .�+O b..N +L W..• N NO ..•uo N Nu 6 O'er ^ ... R 6 J y'�'•- N O NO NO'�K ]:✓ V LLR .ru h"yW OL•yN uL PLC ^ �u t g C L N� L O T A A C E 6 d > � � �. �• N V A d N V U IC u u y✓ C V/ l C d °� q O P O] „ Z u .°V u L u� D A W N �. •q. q u j1 N � L L 0. U �a d N � W ti O M^ •4.• L u a {� ✓ P N l,T � ` T Y N i y l P W OI � r�V ^GVdN ✓L yO ^CYO '^(INb J W.I N�OL O ^6N OYN ^ L ^.OV V.K N ^O VN.0 1 nV V.O. `n' 60N YLJJM Ly VLI 1.^LU CVi:C S 1. L•�^ •LNV•` •' ^T +OTT ^4 y WI" .. PN �I >N Nn > HLJ« '• ^ [.Jq4. 4 LCNOry iW WL FU• \yC t OL .-C yl \L �b GO 60pLV N �y i[ >O O•y WMOi WV ~ m P W Li r C q Or C O 4 ` u � i� i O C� uV W w C ' V w � W N G w w V N m N �PV O q +RT bWb O � ` V b •C b G M O N _4N ^ C R r � W W • u a- P o O.L N N C. b O C p � N 6 P Y Li L O.V R N V N oq J � O i <+ La v N O q F 2 Y J V L 0 N O U+ 4+ O L O N p } C O O O C N A ? ar a c � W L CuY l bF l u 1- VO� Q O.N O �L O q +J u c. C W q G rq w G V L. N � L u V- rr O. 'O L u W L Y n•' Or L ~ W C W N q — q O � O. l ✓ V W V b L � n W r T ?W 1_ ^ N \. C � O YI u uj CI p M ` 04 ^ N J p W y 2 M •^ L W N F r N p S! N6 C r .LAIL L A O L W d y W L C P p qV0 Ur 1 ^ m L V r6 d Y L O q p .rr p i W +t O O +� O 4 _ba L N W O' C • N W rn V u L° y N O b t 4J l W .r N N �qV W R yP r b O V cq N W G LO. o u l wR mo a y c. o a V U Y d V4r C V V 7 L V 6 J N c c'vr2 w°.a c p 9 f o n u4 •- c W i y r l Y y O Y• rar N V Y a�q V` C N° Y y n Nc G V J L rtY1C N L tip' J .y V P CW«• T.^q^ aIUP l6.-• JSWI N C w ^ b O. A E uu O ) 4C N G` u p u W bN0 q ^ U �_ V- sir NW O V W L N s Y O � A O u— T q V r-• — N CO W I M C ^0 ryL V. w p q �N PrgirlL N V �~ d TV c C u PN or 6m N N W C CNyN Y to L p- L V � J L q= .[ Vr•• yJ 36 VO 4�Q )U F f^O Ht O l• q A M N L M ar P W O L N q F +! L ! On (L GO LTW rL 7 a� �— U b pr � Y ••C. r C q Or C O 4 ` u � i� i O C� uV W w C ' V w � W N G w w V N m N �PV O q +RT bWb O � ` V b •C b G M O N _4N ^ C R r � W W • u a- P o O.L N N C. b O C p � N 6 P Y Li L O.V R N V N oq J � O i <+ La v N O q F 2 Y J V L 0 N O U+ 4+ O L O N p } C O O O C N A ? ar a c � W L CuY l bF l u 1- VO� Q O.N O �L O q +J u c. C W q G rq w G V L. N � L u V- rr O. 'O L u W L Y n•' Or L ~ W C W N q — q O � O. l ✓ V W V b L � n W r T ?W 1_ ^ u i C � O v � C p M ` 04 ^ r" v W y M psi p d O_ W N6 C r N L A O L W d y W L C P p qV0 Ur 1 ^ m No d Y G O •� N i W +� b 4 _ba rOy O' Y N Vr W 4 L° b cb qc W y` •Y o N OIL }^ W R r- 4 3 V O cq .�' W �n v ar wR mo WLL�q .V O U Y d V4r C V b N 4 7 N Jm LLpO u�^ b p 9 f o n u4 •- c W i OC r V �V li y C�`�� p N C V` C . T L O Y .OL. ✓ n Nc G V J L rtY1C N L tip' J .y V P CW«• T.^q^ aIUP l6.-• JSWI N C w ^ b d q aL•a uu O ) 4C Y nV l bN0 q •r0. U �_ V- sir NW O V W L N s Y O � s O L^ 0 .n¢ W C 6UL L CO W I O ^0 ryL u} w p L VGN�u q••- vi J'"cV -� .i c C u PN or V V wa c � �. �t°rau L p- L V � J L .[ Vr•• yJ N Iq F p�yN� Ht O l• d dGV A M N L M ar P W O L N p F r C q Or C O 4 ` u � i� i O C� uV W w C ' V w � W N G w w V N m N �PV O q +RT bWb O � ` V b •C b G M O N _4N ^ C R r � W W • u a- P o O.L N N C. b O C p � N 6 P Y Li L O.V R N V N oq J � O i <+ La v N O q F 2 Y J V L 0 N O U+ 4+ O L O N p } C O O O C N A ? ar a c � W L CuY l bF l u 1- VO� Q O.N O �L O q +J u c. C W q G rq w G V L. N � L u V- rr O. 'O L u W L Y n•' Or L ~ W C W N q — q O � O. l ✓ V W V b L � n b L u L ` p u (. �v w° u - O T -N j 6N r.L I •� s N L O W L p4 O • , Y R [ N O O C O `C Or 8 c CV 3J O l W TL q�bY b u G u W L U C ^ T •O W M p u q G P n � ^ T �• G C l L ^ W Jl1 �I� W O c q d v b r qW L C V P aLr. N W m•L- )C P OW L0. u W W f r 0 d W r T ?W 1_ m i u i u O V � C p Y^ M O 04 YN r" LQ C W y M psi p d •�O LL4u N6 C r N N N 9 • W O' 6u W L C P p qV0 Ur 1 ^ m No d Y G O •� N r0i0 +� Or` 4 O d L aV •.- V N Y N C C P y L° arOO.K cb qc W •Y o N OIL }^ a w3 3 V O cq .�' q 7r p cif io WLL�q .V O U Y d V4r C V b N 4 O' Jm LLpO u�^ b m rcr' OC •n 000 V �V li C�`�� p N C V` C . T L O Y .OL. ✓ n Nc G V J L rtY1C N L tip' J .y V P CW«• T.^q^ aIUP l6.-• JSWI I r0.. � N d q aL•a uu O ) 4C Y nV l bN0 q •r0. U �_ V- sir NW .n¢ W M `inN os .p.• N F�4 u VOC O ^0 ryL C q ` L VGN�u q••- vi J'"cV -� .i c C u PN or V V wa c � �. �t°rau L p- L V � J L .[ Vr•• yJ N Iq F p�yN� Ht O l• d dGV A M N L M ar P W O L N p F ar L q { ^� O On (L GO LTW rL 7 yP �— U b pr � b L u L ` p u (. �v w° u - O T -N j 6N r.L I •� s N L O W L p4 O • , Y R [ N O O C O `C Or 8 c CV 3J O l W TL q�bY b u G u W L U C ^ T •O W M p u q G P n � ^ T �• G C l L ^ W Jl1 �I� W O c q d v b r qW L C V P aLr. N W m•L- )C P OW L0. u W W f r 0 d W r P m i V � C qt Y^ r =q LQ C V p d •�O LL4u N6 C r N O q • W O' 6u W L C P p qV0 Ur 1 ^ m No d Y G N Zgwr' d ° d L aV •.- V N Y N C C P y L° arOO.K W< q W •Y dl. uJ V Y q 7r p V WLL�q .V O U Y d V4r C V q N O' Jm LLpO `f OC •n 000 V �V li C�`�� p N C V` C . T L O Y .OL. ✓ l'1 V V i' V J L q N L d J .y vL CW«• T.^q^ •J V q W^ � N d q aL•a uu O ) 4C Y nV bJ.' bN0 q Lulr }1 V- Vuy q O M q N W O ^0 ryL C q ` L VGN�u q••- vi J'"cV -� CgrO� c RL•n PN or wa c � �. �t°rau •`0 ^ U GqW p�yN� Ht G l• d dGV A M N L M ar P W O L N p F ar L q { ^� O On (L GO LTW rL }L yP �— U b pr � J^ ••C. L N O p. yL T—^ N ar N I •- W W q u u V L u 4 J --d- W LQ C •�O LL4u N6 C r N O q • W O' 6u W TlL ON P qV0 V Or WumL� W F d L aV •.- V N Y N C C P y L° arOO.K W< q W •Y W P -c.- L. L �cJL- WLL�q +V -r�l. O' Jm LLpO `f OC •n 000 V �V li C�`�� p N C V` C . T L O O .OL. ✓ p L •• i' N ..Eo J .y vL CW«• T.^q^ u00Vw G4�Y C V1 u bJ.' bN0 q Lulr }1 V- Vuy q qiV ^0 O L VGN�u q••- vi J'"cV -� CgrO� c RL•n PN or wa c � �. �t°rau •`0 q GqW p�yN� Ht G d dGV hL W YOO J••• O N L ..• VL q { ^� O M CV +WC 1b }L e'.V b pr � V P +•� L N O p. yL T—^ N ar N I •- W W q u u V L u y Y rCa v uYC t�• ^VOW V'W N� V4L uW p PU.I.•- 6 q^ yC L r N O N^ y. N (� u 4.• V C v E'q q.n J � y G y NW •O.qu nr = C V N °•n 6v VIO Or •L'() yy. WuypJ U --d- i 4 d LlP', T b 'r 2 •� 41 u J N C r q v V O C L C �LLLE LW qp 04q �O nJ� N rlY4 'O O.-.0 u..� IC i L•Y•f L OV^ 0I N ^OA O Uv Ovi •• b B dN vNn C O yy q -1 p L A q N qq C N O N d fu' COSY 4 p�GV ✓ J1wi V .�� 6 q O � V V V N a0•N O .O.rq T N R� M C4LL •L• bu4 �aIf �; w U V YuQ C�`L OYrr L N > b •S Ar�'T O LL q yr i +rJi AC OV 4 O GL NLN V U _L'•qN aL0 LA NJU t.ub .O U✓ {_ d �NM M 1 vV(N4 'Ni � LLLO G� Uv� T u�OYb bL. � Vr!JL I� ACO �L� ^ n�JV C N T.'N p .� u N T L N O V q rT• pv� n C y V u Li I- 57 �: L �- a 6 n• J L L yI bl hI � ��I tJ ll JI 1I ♦ 1 Z ♦ .iA.,. LlP', E A CITY OF RANCHO C MONGA. MEMORANDUM • fir. •1. DATE: June 10, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planer BY: Michael Vairin. Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6596 - A & R EC�UIPMENT --An industrial sub ivision of W-08 acres of land into 3 parcels within the M -'L zone located on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Lucas Rancho Road - APN 210- 071 -40 This project requires public hearing notification to surrounding property owners within 300' of the project boundaries. The notices were not mailed as required and as a result the attached public hearing cannot be heard. However, the issues outlined in the attached Staff Report and Memorandum can be discussed by the Commission to provide the necessary direction to Staff and the applicant. Upon direction from the Commission, Staff will readvertise this item for public hearing and prepare the final Staff Report for the Commission's action at the next meeting of June 24, 1981. lly submitted, :MV:cd Attachments ITEM r CITY CF RANCt -10 Cf. AONGA STATT R EI ORT t� DATE: June 10, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP Ei96 - A & R EWIPMENT An in ustria su iv7sion of 4.08 acres o an into parcels within the M -2 zone located at the northa ?st corner of San Bernardino Avenue and Lucas Ranch Road INTRODUCTION: This subdivision consists of Lot 8 #if recorded Tract 7936. The subdivision, as proposed, provides for 3 parcels fir industrial use. There is an existing commercial structure in the proposed parcel 3 with the pro- posed parcels 1 and 2 being vacant at this time. She parcel map is acceptable from a land division standpoint, however, the Planning Division has concerns regarding consistency with the proposed Industrial Specific Plan minimum widths of 100 feet on all newly created industrial lots. In addition, conceptual site plans should be submitted for such oddly proportioned parcels- The attached memo from the Planning Division furthe• discusses these issues. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Comniss *on carefully consider the proposed subdivision's consistency with the desired development of the Industrial Area, especially with respect to minimum frontage and the type of development possible on such long, narrow lots. Staff should ti,en be directed to prepare a resolution for either denial of the tentative map or, with the applicant's con- currence, conditional approval with 2 lots rather then tKree. This approval, along with the Environmental finding, can then be cuifirmed as a Consent Item at the next meeting. Respectfully submitted, �y LBH: :jaa ITEM F i PICDerra of DATE JRICACnf RrrlJn Mc. &t410 9:76: CO p+ /1Y31 966 8 70 7 na.11 1 nr I MIM. TENTATIVE MAP PAR%C1jF_"1 SAP C596 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANZ LEGAL LAVA DUSCRIaT10N Lam n •wN.'f A.,. Ib ,AM w DAN ""'[D lx 1'Mn Iln ar nnr0 'CA.SO Ira AM 4f.. 04'OnD3 ar tlnr 4111P41DIUD rlN2Y. r M.w la+ ar.D rY 0aA 9114 -, - n.1 eRarK'CM. was tP rttcrt rCALwixV. lTltein, rrr2rVd¢, DOw, unmen ] au i m . r �In4 c.s4h m UO /M! -/ °J 1. / F 1•'ro -97 0 Y y. Y` .. MM nn `/ I }� I 1• Y I � I Location sAapC_— — — __j 1 rccc sui<owa. 1 � I i Aft"" /P • 11nYnr 4tnis — I I MLTn4 I tni.[' 4V:1y11:: it l l <aolaernL•nwnnm ./ / �' .r4.+„_ ! ^.•c...s4fr Llf .l•.•'I _ r' __ yrr/..i - ..1 IIr7 lg5I L — 1. PrNM cwtw %�' • 1 ' Gu_ ars+ Selr /� Parcel F --- -- q nr ct.rr.. II k 1>CI un ml2s. inI1C+1 ONtw ✓ Parcel i. /l rtDf s0/ II 1� IF4 I /r Sa.md..•w 1Iq AC r L7111 YiLDnY.. 1 1 eru�wn. ��»� - - -- - — ! 1 o.... w Parcel, , 3 1 r � ---- I P `� . 1 rr rorf! I 1ft 2Mv1c • � 1 / I nb.... 1 y I Y) 1 , iii A _ J olnen.lnwrrnx. T IInY nciDCi 4VI'nVL +I+ I'll Vl[LD I LIJt-Ix 91 -0. AM TM Ifrr iV YLKL. SAN EERNAFOM' — AVE M Ornrr 0rvr /u <rr . plVnlL !, wNTnftl:M n 4 P. fDOtblClff CbIVMf< 1 bMflt'lrfYl' Sllwr• �. *. [rmrc.219b N1D nT1rLT I;" LOOM. p f C w . aa. F+n MentYrrrf' 1 • wm rn IrN1 10 ill! • 1 No M rn.a.l. L.n\ i%t �.0 66ef /I� /Rirll�l.Y� {'I /� 2 ! f rm r•w /77 9I /Sell 9s0 /K• na.11 1 nr I MIM. TENTATIVE MAP PAR%C1jF_"1 SAP C596 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANZ LEGAL LAVA DUSCRIaT10N Lam n •wN.'f A.,. Ib ,AM w DAN ""'[D lx 1'Mn Iln ar nnr0 'CA.SO Ira AM 4f.. 04'OnD3 ar tlnr 4111P41DIUD rlN2Y. r M.w la+ ar.D rY 0aA 9114 -, - n.1 eRarK'CM. was tP rttcrt rCALwixV. lTltein, rrr2rVd¢, DOw, unmen ] au i m . r �In4 c.s4h m UO /M! -/ °J 1. / F 1•'ro -97 0 Y y. Y` .. MM nn `/ I }� I 1• Y I � I Location sAapC_— — — __j 1 rccc sui<owa. 1 � I i Aft"" /P • 11nYnr 4tnis — I I MLTn4 I tni.[' 4V:1y11:: it l l <aolaernL•nwnnm ./ / �' .r4.+„_ ! ^.•c...s4fr Llf .l•.•'I _ r' __ yrr/..i - ..1 IIr7 lg5I L — 1. PrNM cwtw %�' • 1 ' Gu_ ars+ Selr /� Parcel F --- -- q nr ct.rr.. II k 1>CI un ml2s. inI1C+1 ONtw ✓ Parcel i. /l rtDf s0/ II 1� IF4 I /r Sa.md..•w 1Iq AC r L7111 YiLDnY.. 1 1 eru�wn. ��»� - - -- - — ! 1 o.... w Parcel, , 3 1 r � ---- I P `� . 1 rr rorf! I 1ft 2Mv1c • � 1 / I nb.... 1 y I Y) 1 , iii A _ J olnen.lnwrrnx. T IInY nciDCi 4VI'nVL +I+ I'll Vl[LD I LIJt-Ix 91 -0. AM TM Ifrr iV YLKL. SAN EERNAFOM' — AVE M CITY OF RANCHO CAVIONGA METWORANDUM DATE: June 1, 1981 TO: Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer FROM: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner �1 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6596 - A & R EQUIPMENT - An industrial subdivision of 4.08 acres of land into 3 parcels within the M -2 zone located on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Lucas Ranch Road - APN 210 - 071 -40 In reviewing the above - described parcel map, the Planning Division had concerns regarding the development of the northerly two parcels. These two parcels do not meet the proposed minimum width requirements of the Industrial Specific Plan. The proposed Industrial Specific Plan will be requiring minimum 100' widths on all newly created industrial lots. The proposed subdivision does not meet this stan- dard and Staff has concerns that the potential for development of these two parcels, without the minimum 100' width, is very limited. In addition the Planning Commission has, in the past, request.d conceptual development plans indicating how the parcels could be developed under current development standards regarding access, parking, and interior circulation. .Unless these issues can be fully addressed, the Planning Division Staff could not support this subdivision. It is rc- commended that these issues be brought before the Planning Commission for their review and resolution. MV:jr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITE ENGINEER'S REPORT rt�.�lI FILED BY: A & R Eauio0: G9LnFany _ TENTATIVE MAP NO. PM 6596 LOCATION: northwest corner of San-Bernardino Ave . DATE FILED: 4/23/81 _ and Lura5 Ranch Road _ NUMBER OF LOTS: LEGAL OESCRIPT ?ON: Lot 8. TrUt 7936 _ RECEIPT NUMBER: 11102 FEE: 5250 00 ZONE: M? * * * * * * #• * * a * * it * * * * t * * * * * #• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED EY: .i Richard Newton GROSS ACREAGE: 4.08 acres ADDRESS: ?4 li s . "T" Street MINIMUM LOT AREA: 41.828 sa. ft. Ortarjo. CA 91762 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE W 0 9254 F4��ILSr�at 987 _6295 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINES° Dedications _ 1. Dedication by final map of all interior stree-; rights-of-way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. _yam 2. Dedication by final map of the Following missl ;-y , ghts -of -way on the following street3- additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on 24' Corner P/L radius required on Lucas Ranch Road _ Other X_ 3. Rights ut vehicular access shall be limited as follows: San Bernardino Ave. 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: _ 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 11 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6596 Page 2. Improvements (Bonding is required prior to ® Recording for all parcels ) ❑ Building permit for ) T. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement-, sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and --treet lighis) on all interior streets. X 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the -following streets: *inrlimlinn Innlcraninn and irrinn4finn nn ma+a,,. STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PV,MT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET TREES STREET ILIGHTS MEDIAN ISLAND* - -� OTHER Lucas -Ranch Rd re a-i r I X X X San nd Ave. rex X X X Lie 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. X_ 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities are to be underground. _X 11. Developer shall coordinate, anc where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. _ 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. _ (X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern. California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underqround service. _ 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: 17. The following specific imensions, i.e., cul-de-sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: 18. The following existing streets etrn eubstasdar They will require: Approvals and Fees _ 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final man will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP N0. 6596 Page 3 is X 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows. A. Caltrans, for: _ B. City. i�- C. County Dust Abatement District: _ D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5 deep: E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: Map Control 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: X 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way line accord- - ante with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. _ 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located _ 26. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs clarification as follows: 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. 0 Parcel Map Waiver 28. Information submitted at the time of application ic / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map ertif7 ate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flocd Control (Bonding is required prior to [A Recording for all parcels ) 0 Building permit for ) X 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- - ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. X 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- - perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewal' at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:` _ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will a required to assess impact of increased runoff. X 34. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP N0. 6596 Mi scel I areous Page 4 X 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. _ 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. _ 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: X 39. Proper grading and erosion control, including the preventation of sedimenta -• tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. _ 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for -the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. X 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewFr• treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requeted. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. X_ 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the fina snap unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. x_ 43. At the time of Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER By: RC£ 20 L'I (ZITY OF RANCHO C(,'(. US0 GA STTA.EF REPORT DATE: June 10, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PlO. B1_12 ; VICTOR D. EASON - Interim Use of business office located at 9513 Business Center Drive, Suite J, for the Foursquare Gospel Church in Rancho Cucamonga. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting review and approval for an interim church facility to be located in the Cucamonga Business Park, as described above. This request is similar to the Gala Fellowship application previously approved by the Planning Commission. Staff has provided the appropriate Resolution of Approval with Conditions for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicant, Victor D. Eason,'representieig Victory Chapel, has requested approval to occupy a suite in the Cucamonga Business Park located generally on the southwest corner of Arrow and Archibald Avenues (Exhibit "A "). The applicants are proposing to utilize the suite as a business office during the regular work week, for prayer meetings on Wednesday evenings, and regular church services on Sunday mornings. Attached please find a letter from the applicant outlining the specific use proposed for the offices. In addition, the applicant has provided a survey of existing or potential tenants in the building also attached. It is the applicant's intention that this would be an interim facility for an unspecified length of time until the congregation is large enough to support a permanent facility. ITEM G I Staff Report June 10, 1981 Page 2 ANALYSIS: The present site is currently zoned M -1, with a General Plan land use designation of General Industrial. Church related uses ire allowed subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Cofmmission. The existing uses in the surrounding suites of the building are various business uses which operate on weekdays generally from the hours from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. The church business office will occupy the space on weekdays; Wednesday evenings, after 6 p.m., the applicants intend to use the suite for prayer meetings, Sunday mornings would be for regular church services. There are approximately 70 parking spaces within the immediate vicinity of the location of the proposed use (Exhibit " "). As the Commission will recall from their review and approval of the Gala Fellow- ship application, the main issue relative to church uses in industrial zones is parking availability. The church presently has approximately 40 members in the congregation. Since the group meetings and activities will occur at tires other than normal business operation hours of the industrial park, ample parking should be available. None of the present businesses in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use are open or in operation on Sunday morning, or evenings, and would therefore not conflict with the proposed use. Staff has attached recommended Conditions of Approval, similar to those used on the Gala Fellowship application relative to time limits and hours of operation. CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing notice was advertised in the Daily Report newspaper on May 29, 1981. And 32 public hearing notices were sent to surround- ing property owners within 300' of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RKOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the above- described regv st and consider all input and material relative to this project. A Resolution of Approval with Conditiors is provided for your review and consideration. 11 BKN:DC:jr" Attachments: tted, Letter from Applicant Tenant Survey Exhibit "A" - Location Exhibit "B" - Proposed Resolution of Approval Map Parking Areas /Site Plan with Conditions L_I C.m 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. O. Bos; 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ATTENTION: Planning Department RE: 9513 Business Center Drive Suite J Dear Sirs: The subject premises, 9513 Business Center Drive, Suite•J of Cucamonga Business Park, Rancho Cucamonga, will be used during the regular work week as the business offices of Victory Chapel. Prayer Meeting will be held after 6:00 P.M. on Wednesdays and regular church services will be conducted on Sunday mornings. We do not anticipate a conflict with adjacent businesses due to parking because of the offset time of our activities. We will be using our facility when the other businesses located within the park will be generally closed. Victory Chapel represents the establishment of a New Church of The Foursquare Gospel in Rancho Cucamonga and this location represents,only an interim facility until we establish our permanent church. There are presently approximately 40 members of the congre- gation representing approximately half that many automobiles. This would seem to have a minimal impact on the park in general. The suite does not require any improvements or modifications as it is very functional for our reeds at this time. We may make some minor modifications such as the addition of a short section of partition but that would come later. Again we do not anticipate any conflict with the other tenants within the park because of the different times of use. Res ectfully submitted, VICTOR D. EASON /fj "Ni L] TYPE OF USE AND HOURS OF OPERr.TION OF EACH ADJACENT OCCUPANT,IN BUILDING 8 WHOSE'PAR1rING COULD BE USED BY VICTORY CHAPEL SUITE A Sherry's Place - Catering - Office /Warehouse Monday - Friday 7:00 - 7:00 SUITE B Vacant - Offices SUITE C 'Vacant_ - Offices - Under discussion with an Insurance Company whose hours would be 8:00 - 5:0P Monday - Friday SUITE D Vacant - Office /Warehouse under discussion with a company that sells and services private telephone equipment whose hours would be from 8:00 - 6:00 Monday - Friday SUITE E American Printing - General Printing Services Office /Warehouse Hours 8:00 - 5:30 Monday - Friday SUITE F Vacant Office /Warehouse SUITE G William Shubin - Offices - Certified Public Accounting 8:00 - 5:00 Monday - Friday SUITE H Forecast Mortgage - Offices - 2nd Trust Deeds 8:00 - 6:00 Monday - Friday SUITE _J Victory Chapel - Business Offices - 9:00 - 5:00 Monday - Friday Wednesday Evening after 6:00 Sunday Mornings a tv.gp` 1. io.e 1A CITY O RANCHO CU NMONGA PLA.NN[RG DIVISION ITEM: xe�C $e'10 TITLE: WCOMCb4 MAP EXHIBIT: °°"° C55� NORTH 1 II: A \ I, 547 _ _ • "( a °- rj yll R.' NI •yAJJR pY/ N.1.Yy NI JRI AA.10I O/I{M.Y MLI 1�JIJR �� trw[M1IJR •J1•J{ (rl i %1YL']Il_ oRRi lj . YM4Ml4'l OlwN a .i ..�.0 s!R • e:n• xA� j rado wi•YtA JIAILYII . YS1J'�livI• /' Ybl LOCATION OF THE UNIT TO BE USED BY VICTORY CHAPEL LOCATION OF PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE FOR EVENING AND SUNDAY MORNING USE NUITH CITY 01' ITEM: Cop ql-lo RANCI i0 Ci'CAiVtlO \'GA TITLE: i1' g PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE. ""I Wr. 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 81 -10 FOR VICTORY CHAPEL LOCATED AT 9513 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE, SUITE J, IN THE M -1 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 26th day of May, 1981, a complete application was filed by Victor D. Eason for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 10th day of June, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission _solved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and, 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions Alah applicable thereto, will noi; be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -10 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. This use shall be permitted at this location for two (2) years from the date of this approval. .^.r, exteoision by the Planning Commission could be granted if extenuating circumstances are present. 2. The offices shall be used as business offices only during the week days from the hours of 3:00 a.m. to 6:00 P.M. The offices may be used for group meetings only after 6:00 p.m. on week nights and during the weekend as long as adequate parking is available. 3. No group meetings will be permitted which would exceed the available parking or cause adverse affects upon abutting businesses or properties. If such problems arise, then this item will be brought before the Commission for their consideration and possib'.c termination of such use. Resolution No. Page 2 El 4. All City Codes and Ordinances shall be complied with at all tines. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS IOTH DAY OF JUNE, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman — ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of June, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LA CITY OF RAN 010 CLAONGA < Cr of o FII � Z 1977 [ DATE: June 10, 190-i TO: Mcmkers of the Planning Cc- :ss•ion FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Pla.nn !r SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -11 - bEASON --The development of 1 5, `L8 square foot professional office complex and a 4,355 square foot restaurant building on 1.84 acre_ lend in the AP (Administrative Professional) zone, loc-tnd on the wept side of Archibald Avenue approximately 150' south of Jevoyi, Street - APN 208 - 801 -39 and 40. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting review and approval for the development of a two story uffice builiing and a Steer 'N' Stein to be located on the west side of Archbald south of Devon as de- scribed above. This is a new Developm!nt Review application for the same property upon which the applicant received approval for a professional office complex in Augus- of 1.980, Director Review No. 80 -30. The project has been revieted by the Design and Devel- opment Review Committees and has under one appropriate revisions per their comments. Staff has reviewer the project and has recom- mended conditions of approval for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing construction of a 15,128 square foot professional office buildin3 and 4,355 square foot Steer 'N' Stein restaurant on 1.84 acre; of land. The project site is located on the west side of Archiball Avenue approximately 150' south of Devon Street (Exhibit "A "). The site presently contains a masonry and wood storage building tha: is in a blighted condition from fire. In addition, the site contains numerous mature trees, some of whicK were partiai:y destroyed 9y fire; the remainder of the site is vacant. The project site is bounded on the west and north by single family residences and on the south by vacant land. The er.istir; -.rade gently slopes from the north to the south at approxi- mately a 2% grade as indicated in the Conceptual Grading Plan (Exhibit "F ") The property is presently zoned AP ( Administrative/ Professional Office), and the General P13n designates this site for office uses. ITEM H I r i f �J Staff Report June 10, 1921 Paae 2 ANALYSIS: The Site Development Plan, Exhibit "B ", has been developed in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance standards and requirements. Setbacks, parking requirements, and landscaped areas are all being pro - vided in accordance with standards and policies set oy the Planning Commission. Archibald Avenue is a Special Boulevard in the General Plan and the applicant has proposed to landscape it accordingly. The applicant is proposing to retain existing healthy trees whenever possible, in order to preserve the site character and provide a mature landscape appearance to the project (See Exhibit "B "). Staff recommends that the parking lot design be revised to provide a landscape planter as shown on the attached Exhibit "G ". Access to the site is being provided by a single driveway located near the north property line, with a shared emergency access lane being provided at the south property line. Full street improvements will be required -including curbs, gutters, meandering sidewalks, and street Aft The building elevations, as shown on Exhibits "C, D, E" indicate the use of horizontal cedar siding, scored cedar fascia, dark stained wood trims, heavy timber trellis , do accent color band, and concrete g64-e- the roofing. Colored elevations, renderings, and 'building materials samples will be available at the Planning Commission meeting. The Design Review Committee has reviewed the project and recommended approval of the design with the exception of the south elevation of the restaurant building. The Committee felt that high visibility of this elevation on a Special. Boulevard warranted additional architectual treatment. Therefore, it is recommended that the project be conditioned to require this elevation to be revised and brought back to the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. Additionaliy, it is recommended that a minimum of four 15 gallon trees be planted along the south elevation. El E Staff Report June 10, 1981 Page 3 0 RECOMMENDATION- It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and consider the various aspects of this project. If the Commission concurs with the .findings and analysis of Staff, then appropriate conditions of approval are attached for your review and consideration. Res/ectfully submitted, Cif PlanrJe,, BKH:DC:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Restaurant Elevations Exhibit "D" - Restaurant Elevations Exhibit "E" - Office Elevations Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Proposed Parking Lot Revision Part I - Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions '_QTY ' I": ` ifs :i '_QTY ' I": ` ifs 0 1.41�V._.. C✓�Y �YY•Y�w.n eNC W..�.� G ONZ SYMBOL* ir..• NNMO fYq • t0 NY.N NMM YNI[YVY� 1 . � OYMw11Y VYY • [O Y[ NMtYO [MO YI![ �•Y ` NptIM IY[•ION [YYq[NJ1gg0 �� OYWINO VY[... fYYYYMYMO YO f4q tYV.[[V YY[ • YO /[t YRt p YYON +aN.goM. NNYIYNYIY CITY OF AM RANO-10 CUCANIONGA qp PL kNNI \G DIVISON e i0 k %�i ITG\ I !2z I (r e l _ TITLE `lam ?Lm EXHIBIT: 1 SCALE: E SOUTH IELEVATIOW CITE' OF ITEM: - - 9 I" 11 RAI CHO CUCATMONGA TITLE F"eS !? �c PLANN:NC DIVISION EX1I113M. I' _SCALE: C LI t11Y..p.11 C<OM.Y1.p 11 <Y�0 -1 / :� - - �COYYY„<WMY1Y[Ypy�p All EAST ELEVATION Lim _.. I08Ti E4EIAT:OI ..+ a.. .c.a.ws . a<Y- CITY Or, ITEM:- RANCHO CUCANION - A TITLE: 26SONA NT f &pINg., PLr �'NI \G UI �'ISIO�i LX1 {IBIT: r - SCALE- """` <OM .blw b,H110 0 COM<n....N,Ne iM< n00 /INO 0 ._9W_N +s,..ns auu EAST A WEST ELEVATIONS �.2iV :KNrt C.O.O .NM ,."$. MO.•O.O. 1 � ....._.. U �'i .. ... c... NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS CITY OF RANCHO CL GUNION;GA PLANNING DIVISION ITEM: f.L�• 41 ° 11 TITLE- °L.EA//�Mbis'�2 EXHIBIT- SCALE: L-I] E nn/ 1 1 sr: asr•IcC rfWi.k�JIML 1 i _ �a ry , .I I •f 1.4. w I: • c 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCATNIOi'GA PLANNING DIVISION E :r r( • 1 a L� V NORTH ITEM: og $l TITLE: CoNdSM&L EXHIBIT: SCALE- r x � .. � - = %" i- :fir .- .- .•...� ;, ` s _ rc(iriaeo -J :: n• -'. L� V NORTH ITEM: og $l TITLE: CoNdSM&L EXHIBIT: SCALE- E ti✓....,.+�....1-- .�+_.. ...�- �"a..�.J.- --ter -._.._ ...'�_..�. In 1 1� NORTH CITY Or, ITEM: - -- .rx . LL_ IAANCIAO CL'C.Aii /IO \'GA TITLE: ?9op��o PLA INNING DIVISION LXI-II[3lT: __ -_64__ SCALE: .y .+1 e lu 4 46 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part 1I of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaraticn will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Las Palmas Commercial Center APPLICAiv'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: DEASON & ASSOCIATES, INC., 1802 East "G" Street, Ontaric, CA 91764 NAME:, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF ERSO D T HaBri sO ALA CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Thomas 130 East 9th Street, Upland, CA 91786 714 981 -3632 835 Z,Iand9' J f chib(' AvenueDPRancAtro CAUCamonya�P.B CEL NO.) ,�,.,. ..1 P ,..a �„ - 268 -80/ - 39.4 -0 C _ LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING None - Y -! REGIONAL, STATE SUCH PERMITS: i AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A 17,860 square foot 2-story office building and a 4,T=squaretoot restauran building ACRF1'GE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: _Acreage: 1.84 - No existing buildings DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACIi NECESSARY SHEETS): The project -site is presently in a blighted state. It is existing trees partially destroyed (burned during a s ruc- ure ire, ) 1ha topography is level with a na ura gra e to Lne south. txisting structures consis t of one 20, x masonry wood storage bu lding. It is also •.n a blighted state and should be removed. Properties surrounding the site are ei er Vacant or, 7r, medium ens resideTLIal inhabit the site. There are also no cultural, is oric or scenic aspects associated withthe site. the project, part of a larger project, one of a series cumulative actio.is, which although indiviuua llv small, as a whole have significant_ environmental impact? WILL THIS PRCiSECT: YES NO .. M XX 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? XX 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? XX 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water., sewage, etc. ): XX 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? XX 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? XX 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and in °ormaticn required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date -� Sig::atur .0as rr Title I- -13 RESOLUTION NO. A RESO:.UTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -11 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 150' SOUTH OF DEV014 STREET IN THE AP ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 6th day of March, 1981, a complete application was filed by James Ii. Deason for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 10th day of June, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in .which the use is proposed; and, 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be det- imental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and, 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on June 10, 1981. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 81 -11 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached standard conditions: 1. The south elevation of the restaurant shall be revised and brought back to the Design Review Committee for approval prior to issuance of building permits. Z. A miniv,:--m of four (4) 15- gallon tree. be planted along the mouth elevation of t;,e restaurant. r C E Resolution No. Page 2 3. The parking lot shall be revised to include a planter near the main entrance to the parking lot to the satis- faction of the City Planner. 4. A lot line adjustment for the project site shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The secondary emergency access shat. be constructed of compacted decomposed granite and r_cvered with 6 inches of native :;oil and planted with grass. 6. A six (6) foot high masonry wall will be provided along the west and north property lines. 7. Dense landscaping shall be provided around the perimeter of the project for screening and buf- fering purposes. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 1981. ANN PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _ Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th clay of June, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES- COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIm'ERS. -1 2 i� E n T W O W rJ v W O f i D O V 0 -r_ ti u q C V u � W •� u D 6 tqi N r SY JO O S� 1. d U rc r _ O O L6 .. q Q u Y V 9 n C W ° iV. U R F a V y J V Q u G o gip. 1-. Q LOi Y C N k ' r L tv C L 9 W p_ q v d O Y V Y 1 Y Y Y p C q V 9 Y V M 4 c .^ N C 4 N N q � o P a C t C n A V a Y u Q oa A O V V V u O y- N W O + W C V V Y N q L N Q Y L n _ E u j 40 VC L _ C G pq V TO C V .°- rce � ^ ^up Yv YC OY . Pw c�a c « ^ o c O •.N '� qN C d L nrn N+U N N C rn N ^m I- N O V O O yJ v T r L >•^ < L R L N P V nJ C N L E J Y Y W T m l '^ IV R A T R O f V C V yw ANN PW C „rLii nM wYY 'nc °u rn U P f N Nl' �R du•rC• ^� Oq _ C Y C R 6 _L ETq N �42 R vLi 4.0 2n Va 4 .`C N W q W O V O'er ^� gPi wCi Vn ^r} m V C l Q L 6 C L R tr = 4y Q V qL LL N J q 2 n ^ � V y V O N R O✓ i•� W �� •4 u a L tJY V> p °lY L L P N 49 9 u � C N C O C N C y '_ N V Y W y d 6 O .-• a T n $ N l C P.• '� C A V ^ •O y^ N N � dq9 N C G V C T/ O V W nL C O V Y^ P t V n N V q�a vW °IN o�io W OV ^yC 9 y. O j�L •L-' W M L yy uGIO.'L O O s t1 O S W` r R V O• i W qY y ^9 uY ^ C n y�� L• d•.• V n r1 brJ�9T L_ �•OT !l; �r ' 02 •GOO C O V Ny W O �C �O W C G V N O YC q6• L u V N ^Y aT r N C LCF `y ^UN tl��w� pY w' L � •_ �'OOCO C C 1°. S L_V L E `a L .' LG C �w� LL q L 9�n.NU L C'Fi .+✓V v l0 w. C P 4r ` A+ y Y V u r � C •O L t�pVW •J C L V n n ^L 6 r N Q q V .-. � V V•�Y •V n^ '�O OgOy •�N NL V � � a'E L 9 L V ••U. O\. LN4 �ti r T.� bNrOi.0 W � G'Q 4l�9 'D Qn V•YiQ9 V� CV V LwO V .�. 9 � ^O w 'J VLL-N M � J+N Tyn .rV. V6 C9G L ^yt�'�A N6 uU C4O V yyr l Z. ^tin O �q q N OY4� Y. =iW' J"w.l « a a FLOC G nr a��c a. P �P °c o•° vn NC i v-.• L t%.°. is yu Ewa = •V�ONqu OL dV N• � n 6Y0i OY r. C N V 1 C. Nyy ^N u YCC I' q gY•+•la y V� l n. C NL4YU. d y` Oo70 J•Cq -v.0 Ou � W r Liu 'V QC CN•.0 w Q°' VO• C C` N ` �' qL 9 N y •rl VMN ..°. py LN V.� 1 n • �YU UN V_ i�ys1 �� N O. 'V T^r r L VOY r n r'�u °^ O C �� LAi�uZ + q -nV �Wl�J N' 46 'r, ••n _P" •- Y� L C •°.. CC d If Y u r C p F pC. L°. L w N ^ 4 rp �d N v aL j i c gl c o"i u i 6i a'rn OGl gV-ii 'V^ N Wu L 4 N L lr VLO �O •"•C �k 60 OLO q �~ �fj p V.+ aVOVO• -• L W NCO 9MU' C q NC L •^ 06 9 L .. �°NLL ••• YUaq wCN N^ W C lr .• S u r_ C Y Or N +- ip L d V L u LL a T' �9m L� YVjr � O� C P L 'V G< W l O � Y 4 V L U G W on V^ C uuW S pCC Y. ^••1 yO9 GYp V au OW C 2C Y vY YC 9iL LGU�'Vw •. ^ E T, M ^Y �4 M~ OVI wglCL�Y. n 9 wu IJ OU V NVtC''dOCd C C R .•y N A « O q V d N i•. F 'V a r.. l[LLr p •- V +•C O VL M ' VL • OVV Y O V C OC ^?•_M .I rN. � O 4 M p rp C O O O LlC .OV L ON "OZ 9L dO q -YD 'J 4N u Q �O AN .� O Y° a 7 d'O 'n i'u „b •N WGNN ` �W�^ 6.LwYi •n d 44 Na SV r W Y L V` 'C! �' Y d L Qb Vr •t[N W•rL•LY 1-•j Wyq.. Q/ yV J.•M NL i, i•••� 4•VL �VN•• LdLVLp NYY [��. 1�LVAUq N O •� ^ �I VI NI n, � u q C V u � W •� u D 6 tqi N r SY JO O S� 1. d U rc r _ O O L6 .. q Q u Y V 9 n C W ° iV. U R F a V y J V Q u G o gip. 1-. Q LOi Y C N k ' r L tv C L 9 W p_ q v d O Y V Y 1 Y Y Y p C q V 9 Y V M 4 c .^ N C 4 N N q � o P a C t C n A V a Y u Q oa A O V V V u O y- N W O + W C V V Y N q L N Q Y L n _ E u j 40 VC L _ C G pq V TO C V .°- rce � ^ ^up Yv YC OY . Pw c�a c « ^ o c O •.N '� qN C d L nrn N+U N N C rn N ^m I- N O V O O yJ v T r L >•^ < L R L N P V nJ C N L E J Y Y W T m l '^ IV R A T R O f V C V yw ANN PW C „rLii nM wYY 'nc °u rn U P f N Nl' �R du•rC• ^� Oq _ C Y C R 6 _L ETq N �42 R vLi 4.0 2n Va 4 .`C N W q W O V O'er ^� gPi wCi Vn ^r} m V C l Q L 6 C L R tr = 4y Q V qL LL N J q 2 n ^ � V y V O N R O✓ i•� W �� •4 u a L tJY V> p °lY L L P N 49 by r O V 9 . O NO (n C N °s Y L W ^ Y P r q L q gg Y '$ L Y EEC n _ q V u W u U•rL. •� F� L N V yVi Y Win• L Y q V: Cn N Y l V q Vq R Ol s o a tiII m d D r ^ L O R n q M Y � W G r V N R u V � 9 w � q Y C i Y Y Y Y P q Y W 7 _ Y O Y N Y W uC C q O Y 9 w � r � u pC/ Y 'n fi n e c o r V•d N M> • Y do a P u a ^ Y q N L O"V 4 L WV 4 v°r iu •..0 4 9 u � C N C O C N C y '_ N V Y W y d 6 O .-• P V S '� C A M q ^ •O y^ q N � dq9 N C G V C O ^• d V W nL C O V Y^ P t V n N V q�a vW °IN o�io W OV ^yC 9 y. O j�L •L-' W M L yy uGIO.'L O O s t1 O S W` r R V O• i W � y M1 Y q N 1r L• d•.• V n 02 •GOO C O V Ny W O �C �O W C G V N O YC L u V N ^Y (p � •_ U.N C C 1°. S L_V w 't Y t N q L V ••• �.� V O> y q by r O V 9 . O NO (n C N °s Y L W ^ Y P r q L q gg Y '$ L Y EEC n _ q V u W u U•rL. •� F� L N V yVi Y Win• L Y q V: Cn N Y l V q Vq R Ol s o a tiII m d D r ^ L O R n q M Y � W G r V N R u V � 9 w � q Y C i Y Y Y Y P q Y W 7 _ Y O Y N Y W uC C q O Y 9 w � r � u pC/ Y 'n fi n e c o r V•d N M> • Y do a P u a ^ Y q N L O"V 4 L WV 4 v°r iu •..0 4 P N V G b N N N ry '� O � T C •� V C Cy VI y t A rr0•u 1 i 2ND 1' Aq G V~ CA ✓V L O � N CO C- '04 Y �bpV nJy�N q' d Y Y C • N b� q' � V � O T V � L u G y GG O L L UN a VLN ?rr^ VT Ny �q� .r 17 7V �O�t � �� .• V U ON ub�•C 'V ILy2H�•.Ci•LVO NN L`ML N Jp N O d w.V dw V O� dl L i b O N Np - ^O' .L.• dPr}i• G+ u W L OV PO FVAL Ob w.Ca VGA . QVI b l f L r b u N N ^N ` L L ^O -p CT i Y d �� Pw •GUS u p��N�uyV "— N G 9 n c -yy'c �bu 'ov i W .: C .� q u T Ll. A c b b �• •V � y Or N .L � � •VV N~ p i u i NCpN N - 'id G t ON •'iuf'e^ w�M V� [Vf A C1 I l0 � p u A V U lOS Y > b L � V G N q V P^ L A V• O N d V p� g C� y 6 rrOi�L OOY L_i Np 1 N O} � ud g V •'IDL ^•^irr qy .22 L� yNN j y M V� • V< b Jpp L r lNNL6NG Y• r N C �i a p Avg P ° n c o ^ t- NPFL' •-d Aa w i Lo <�e.°`N iy^ M �FNA Wr� l` 0 Oy N N d p�0. cyJyYO 'r'L L c YV V�Lm CST It NPrrdi W�O V[C' M- LI' N gJA•dn (.Na Or GV M NYN hV VON P q 6 C N N^ ^ V - 4' O'^ ca •� y dP w V > > ro ^O' _ oN �N�� C oa.� y[ v 2 c ¢ it ar.�-. c L«L• c °c" p'�dr ° -•'.NL !E'9 v _ Y d O V A Wc N Or `Cp L fi ` L L T• O b� O^ Ccb 4�q N d G uC y L f! 6LdW04V9p 2 N CrLnV FiL -�� P.Cr OL� PA > la ' O O C�V G: W.a 6 jNC '^ ✓>• A6A TV`r0 ♦ N N c. + •� C N Y L^ ^} ` � V ^^ qq I V r' O V V' d - O� V P u rcr v N` N C u ^ Q C d W � }• u V L ^ N O V r N� L N Y V V V A ' V 2 L 'p C y V T N y rOn N LT T p C] O y S G6 d L l C -uu..• HZ 4 NV a.2a < tiN Q 06 M CO H2� riin rpi0 G�rrOV S�Nbp A p C o W L P ,L "fir �'• b L P n VANO !� C� L'• C2 p UOL N C Vl= PrLO >•Lr - cc L N N_•c q _. �yy � � ^ Nt�..c. -. •.- apo g "'UUU��, •• OA ^ C Cu �VO rr'J O npL CU RV ` N.V N N F •�- V L }�� \( \��•l.2 Vl LG� O C q�0`V O =VC „O '� nIV L rPCU A�6 'V� rrC L ^ N60 LNdV •J• N 6 V' Lp"y YN NO !pr L My N•�pLVT C C d d A yC u O •O b .• {y p f. C ^ L � V L O O O- � N � C A A V d Lr - •"r 0 •N V• C V O- u- q Y 0 q F7aCO O NY •� y VVC -U� O V N_bN N - }Lq GVT Ca )�qV 'CI L V V V ,J, W C V y V U V O� � fJ • L L L V p% � - •Vp P C C � p O A "� O L Pu �l1 LVb drr V Ptid O+, •.• u'�C•lV+P ]•L N'r' pV� �. yr5 O 4 q -42 O' ��.y� b V -d W N V•+P 4N Pi Na4Y p+- r Nut d` W ^b�••V• PyV 6 O L „ cC. •'o ° F, �r• Vup^ mo' a _wq �c wa w. -tip °c o>.o.. cyy. onr A c •aL L �. d 5 N A • V r N O U r0 N o b C u w C N q w 4 u V �� `r P Cr V V u V C✓ N' V L N�N� r A "' uT S`q•- S w. L tiN OG CO Ll Y L 1] y: N U y u u - O V w d •� A N w= } O pO W L u r N V A v OI C A N N C a V A i TO T) Z q u � P6rr PL �� L N N N N ✓..C• T O l� Y �� V N O Vy N H � g V V 1 Y u q� bur :} 6N N b WN y C'ql PC LV wt: C Q P IY.^ uy 6 .6 d y.L OV ��Lbb V NO L�•Ilyr 1V C LIV L Ou ^O L •� C C C �V 7 i L `• V ^ T Y v c E `� T v C a L c c ^ N � y d M g N N O . L C d c� p•+ A° a 6 N ,Nr u... d i .+ b os >,- ..�=.. �' P a .°o .°o_ o -�iy VLAr ii L Ny 4L>,N N - lrYGr N�� a° .dia N.n -L+o i� iG° N qua b >N V�!NAO V 2] y (bj V' Nd 0 •Vlr9 N [u T 0 VbVt 1. �- N t^ ON r�L qb Y•Qi rVil � P L } �VU NyT� �C L NICO VOV 4w C4riQ r +CL.•• .NV TN * y g Q rnc. -wn C NCTJ� ":2 .� •A o c N L �[ r :: �. ^ U N d � 4 O- i d u N ` V] W L •O• -' O' nl c��= Y P. J] O O p y r l L•'% - - ry L� O � L^ V ]•r • V L E N ^ u •� w A` V V V C• ! l ` N 6 WOIr •C 4 O hrr � O QC YI NgVN +t.N Vr 6O QPENN 4v UG a'�pp Y G Y' N IO A 41 01 � •� N \� < N IO � m V �� V •I Vr • \� C Y H N O Y. q u O •�. A ... L ° A p ` I N • •. ^ VD • GC J C TCi �uR a O BUY yR mC VN.� 04 gON�q T. � a Y a• w `' a w. W d 'w rn � d .N• n N u 2 .t. v c o G°. _ .' '1 t �� I I n � e o V R a' WW qCN •� CL uN0 Ow TO «.•. NJC LC 1 N '� V 4' uT� � CV OyV q Lup i•_M 'u pVTU bL LN' i Y=- NN r L V L V l m; q q V G T Y� d TI \rW. L. l �+ •• N " q N� .�V °' T N} � � i C 9 y€ C �� 'C L.-Y. 6 J \r 4 li « A V V L� C L 'n ; q > }� W C •� V' O« Y � °f N •-• .°J �\° w � °y r «z = y7,a CWT L•.W.. c..-� aN° vM °OE � �N o G ��n A:JV V "i 0� }LY O' VN O`+ 4q]yWY M +N u`p b L'u N 'V G, L ACS YyV � VL L +rp L Vu' \O u-ArN+ >\NbC r+r «N 4 ✓uf'A L C L a' Tvy q4 `L C\/q J A +�WC i Y-.•. Q�db OU rG °' t•% N r ° F Y b- ° °'y C N W r] 6 A o g -•� Y L: � W. q F 'L b N l N y • n Y Yi riaJ `_ N+ �• N R ^+ c ° i..• b o ` «Y o c mLN >.t L« nG° r^.°. qY� wc" N•. ° �N`o oI '^ � o0o i be �c �blYi L e LI/I+ q` Rq L�a V q\`� OCU W �N L'O W�yLC „r--'a N"'C O ti� w Ya.Vrar •- 14C. O C O L L O r- _ C .°- al b T 4. •. L \Ar O J° .•. L L L V N y Y W Y y l }\ „ C q !N L W °` l R a c? c .w. ^° I^ �� L y o x \°• o°. mac. N '^ c W a o o `i--• - v T_>J pP.1Lq..°,'Lrgn ' o\. `ai« ,c,°c eoPPc�'E N °q 9 G. 1'•.> -° L 4 b Y R.•. q N N O •� W T 1` I E .n G A A A L n L W JV Cb NL 4q =W0 \Jn ^�= NAY C'bVdF 11u CG� Aq OV O� W V LV y � V uOd Lp � „Cq AV 4•-> -CG' bT dTaarRA 1- q rnC ^ I W {N�b b COQ 8 Ey C ON •-WV CDrUr luT WLCO ,CU ^ WO• LUTq ryV VY p1OC O u_S' oVV _ J q✓ w •n w w Y L b D N„ � 4 U N .N N O L ($ ^ f � •.• c ,l C O• •• Lpq 4 'yO n e 6 O N ^ l a _ 50« E=C TU + �NYC6^ -/�Y FY AGO WVLr{n1 O Y "" CL° 2��'VI a ur0 N V lW ruY +lN qr +L }O_6C NvaiV6 J ^u0 �aL ^ wn °CNq NP CD• Tb O9 y .� � d •.r L� ` N° y C O .•. N Iu g V b N u. el u C •. C ` b V L +^ N 4 O+ � C .� N U C Y W - J V L J u O Y C. J W N � ••V. � b b C N uN 4Nbp l u d q" N U Y L q Z W N N V C C \` L po Y F _ u r L+ •l •... o.t .o2 -:; iY cv u C•_ cc.. �0` pppp a L q q NJ mA ^wW -YC Nn q!�qN GqY Val NA Te l' �•]yyT O. Y VE O� uN �. L L` Y g Y L u uJi m T of; V, q S J � A 6 W R ` U G L N V t L• � 4 C C. 3 C C ` P W m 2b YqN N C Y ��N u OI q J pdp0 _�y�V` Wr N^ bd"'^ .[ 6.Y• u'a'C An NA q y'P' } Y N dV uC f_� qLq11 �y�S L L O'O +pu� O�IrV � qVr Vuby 'r CN L\W V ^VIA V Cr•-C- xL X19 M 6 y N a 0 0 0 I Y W N V Y V R CY{{j J 6 u¢° �\ uCU WNbOJ + OE t°.J gOrYO O mGC GVV' LCw•�w� CV�N v b b ON tJ0 �d ppb 4� pp N L� b rr n C t Y W �^ N Y a Ol m a � -V ppJ ^� V w m •O O �\lurju NC U+• V�NW gV+OT S. ^SY uOq RN Ll�ayl 4 ^L\` T x UL ^JJU O C'^ CVV.•C -V C Lu bq NOO C` ALU� �LS•� O l4` r ^� °rK,]C.0 TN au a b NA (p «J NV " 4 A J U* w O W Tu p u O � [° N•- > � Y C b x m rj�'' �` � b W C aGui. N u Oiam cGVN�Or ' ��b Rte. q ^Aq .- .0 ^L^• V j }I U`I r c �a Ii °� >� „L i =Y uc!�v =w �Fi..c `- � xc'v PS•' ao�`a nAam i �: °o JL gc •-� wC- rO W Omgb [`LU -Y „AOC �.:. TJN b C bYNVq A «rn C C L[I y_4 qd L. Y L• Y C C' u C' Y �' ` N 6 V r Y -+O C d J N 1:.1 N V q ^ Y •. W Y. p O- °-N�LU qulua°•Cp u'u PVS ^CV N C+ m VVw rr «u� V' +VO N +NCI L]L C yA NL 'a ._ .-N o co u.�lE q =YY ^'w- 'n «'N” n`� .-•� °� ^r •mow W w'q RN W ^ -mV O�T nA q•. dl' � PYq `N NJ ppN bq\hl °r'mc ov Lnb ^N ^u m m� a• RN J`Ns w °b>. i—qG °vC. Nn L G a_ r� u uJ• 6K C A _ Y � [' C d ~ N C_� C Y L C M O W a q N N N n =„ R C- C p b L O+ n O n O'er u' �. i ~ u nl 6 Gl N ..°. � W .. W + W •• N O d n' O m N N q !\ r b y. •� •..� b } Y N > O 1: u V C i' 4 i V •• L L V «" y O'r « N N u L L' C. L � 9 T� C «ii b b e L R 2,5- .•« F n urn�A gmbA LI r q a• G...0 > N u� ^ 'Y. 0. G'' 4 rC �: q .Oi L ` � «..-• L.� 6 « L Ci.� °I O.+ L b ` L1 T Yr O^ N J V G' j C n 0 0` L^ •-T. R L a..•V2 4.2 01, Y V O � [n ••°. Lw.. r"..� °z�uTV ... +WNN I: N•�.- r^n °a' V R \.q xfi .• is 'i r.�« � ri`u .'cr s _ [ �c_r� Izn O°. �. Lc iN .I 'L ° � v .. � N N V N O 6 6 JOVGJ 6V V!'V T 3 CC � L O rt C O V VI � NI O 0r 'q�V•� � - `NYI f'I O \GDI \D N ul W u V b b pq Nit r � d N J q N O u n ° N rr q ^ � r• p. L' NVN YY q d d d L' T q r V O ✓ P N N9 Oqw• NW w Vbb C O C L r•O. y� °W L � V V V Y..L• a T p y Q q a t pNV oa a v.-m Y n °i✓ � c L v a N N J L � ^N o`i; Ngusdi 2 s' v uLN GN W w.d. N ° •o.P w Qc o d,T GL ✓L r qC G .Nn a Y 8 I•r � q P4 V � C ON q Y VF Y � C� U O O• Y V p GGG W 'u G N -• l L u A Y N C •^ N V Y O K N q N y b T JN-r b rr j u �� r u ' O• a g V L 6 pL I W L •w• ,Vn � r V O q r0/r LC q w drL d q21 qL Ny yaV y yL V t VA CM, ow P aN c ca: !„ zi L ,n yr n• c a C yr rr, ry 4 yy N V I '` Cq „U. LL LVI cw `cn u E.. � S.✓ u °d �rCp- cLNOn .°. �' Yo .•u «� N W a tr x' q� NV, �4 yi NL VO. ti} j ^_ N•T• ' L ^Z qM` q° WG _L} OW LL q,.w.. JO qJ • L Q 6 M •p L J L T L: L L a L '- V +. L p� y1 C n �- V 6 L r1 Z n: rwi• O l7 C6I I � 1 N� • ��` J YC T C p O L J L C r L ° v .°• N C 4 V N O q O d d d W W W d T P w V N ZW V up ` .,� u N° c y a c � ✓✓ ° N l° o• � Y V ° T q 4 n ^ b` d .^ L WY L W U L q rnL YL }u oW Y Nu V~ d6 LL YV� qL «yl d a« uL was \. Yq M1,G L v ^C Yp.! dN CS` ZO L V ✓ f] Or 1 u^ U U P s Ci c� L oil- ii ui ^ N 2 u p T^ O u 4 r Sr O N L Q N B C b u u O ^ YI V V •t d N q L ^ N ✓y �^ V O'J 6 A y� g n, `W r. q N �✓ Yu L a y 'O _ L c V Y 6 N Q�• W 2 L V �V .(L V^ '�� I��•I i� 1 7 2 d iE lJ r o d 7 Vey 1 .- •!W- 6d C^ ti rqr ^ C ,°r .C..°. C Y.W V q ✓LL? N2L E O \ql VyTU � Yl'I W °N m 'Q V c vuCu N q ^..• � NPR L N d L b �•^ W W + ✓ N N V G P ctr� J NL N giv d W } K K 4 o ^L_ T.Y LV rr JPCfyN/. O WC tJVC J 4 N O ✓\ L C ` ° O ✓ W C° C V W✓ q u C J Q 6 V r NY v ° u .O. ° c i 6. u o< O e• ' u V V C✓ �. VI ••• W N L Y S n i Y� 01 q s N U a rWr p ✓ Or U oie W !� n .-q L N L V YJ d W wuv O C -M q •V q •N 1Y C d p C pL•. „' q r .0 ITN P u U p P L U Y O.r •• Yy4TWV ' N ✓ MWy q u °qy4 d ✓L Vey O .- •!W- 6d C^ ti rqr ^ C ,°r .C..°. C Y.W V q ✓LL? N2L E O rLr' VyTU � Yl'I W °N m •%u° V c vuCu Ir C N Yy� q ^..• � NPR L N d L b �•^ W W + ✓ N N V G P ctr� Wou K NL N giv d ^L_ T.Y LV rr JPCfyN/. O WC tJVC J 4 N O ✓\ L C ` ° O ✓ W C° C V W✓ q u C J r NY v ° u .O. ° c i 6. u o< O e• ' u V V C✓ �. VI ••• W N L Y S n i Y� 01 q s N U a rWr p ✓ Or U oie L L'wc xo , L n n .-q L N L V YJ d W wuv O C -M q •V q •N 1Y C d p C pL•. „' q r .0 ITN P V✓ N G Yn U p P L U Y O.r •• Yy4TWV ' ✓ MWy q u °qy4 u ✓ Lpp jynlL C. w C � 6+• N � u L Y P j; W L p O (W( yy L� 06 -G� OYq Nr P q 4 C I{}� N C N ✓ a O ✓ C N V✓ N {' N O •yP •r 4�[w+ C•• Lq NV O V ,:IP ✓ W S•� q ✓aC uWgy �•LVq � C.• `A `q \°41 .✓ V Lr•W WKON^ NW YF.V GN C ^ L ly'1 •^ q V ✓ Y. O rl•^ q N.q.n l W rr N NOO'^ QV G 6•n W u q Vp✓ v a vi e n of o: E 11 13 CITY OF RANCI.1C Ct;CA6�10N'C.'•. U'',fTF r-.,.-El P ,T DATE: June 10, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Ccmmission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: FNVIRON14ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW K!. 81-07 PRAVER - The development of a reLail garden center on 1.9 acres of land in the C -2 zone to be located 100 feet east of Helms on the south side of Foothill - APN 208 -'oi -043 and 044 ABSTRACT: The applicants have requested review and approval for the development of a retail garden center to be located on the south- east corner of Helms and Foothill Boulevard, The Design Review Committee has worked extensively with the applicant in order to inte- grate the site plan with the existing Perry's Farm Market shopping center and the development of the immediate corner. Through several meetings and discussions, the site plan was developed to integrate more closely with the adjacent center and the immediate corner. How- ever, the Design Review Committee was unable to work out an acceptable arch itecurai design of the facility with the applicant. This parti- cular project is a Woolworth Garden Center which is a prototype building used in all cities which they locate. The Design Review Committee stated the design proposed is not the style of architecture desired for Foothill Boulevard as a Special Boulevard, as described within the General Plan. Although the adjacent shopping center is in need of significant improvements, the Design Review Committee felt that this project should set the tone of the development which would help motivate improvements or new construction of the adjacent center while also maintaining high design standards for Foothill. Therefore, the Design Review Committee does not recommend approval of the archi- tectural design of this development. The applicant did display other concepts that could be utilized in the architectural design of the facility which the Design Review Committee felt wnuld provide a better character. However, the applicant does not desire to develop such designs and is therefore seeking a decision on the architectural design from the full Planning Commission. Based upon the Design Review Committee work and input, staff proposes denial of the project based upon the findings listed in the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND: The project proposes to develop approxima'. Ay a 1.9 acre piece of land generally located on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Helms Avepi!e (E%iibit "A "). The site is one parcel of a parcel map which has not yet oeen approved by the Planning Commission ld is being held pending action if the site plan by the Planning Com- mission. Attached is a copy of the tentative parcel map that will be brought before the Planning Commission pending direction on this pro- posal (Exhibit "C "). The site plan consists mainly of outdoor storage ITEM I 0 V i 6 = T-�z L C'J O LL W p� v � G .V 2 j V C //Cl .v 6 W 2 Y^ P� 6 9 y C P p L d N Wr VyQ - A W •J V O g 7 L L O r N v C q` =C10 L + °CL .dJ V L N 0 x L W 0 6 r O N T ` C +� O C Y w a L•� O � 9 C a� u Z �• 6 �L_Q] q C L 4 y4 S- 9 W vv or W � a G Oy N t. Qi a T O V C d q Y O } N t C u -c N u n r .ti G V O Iq T n A v W r yW G S a w L L 0 1 �I 9 0 u O O 6 p p u N O W 7 V. c u G o _V uu c 4 N d L N J 4 V CJPt L C7 P L l A� aJ V Pf/� O QImI VI 0 E El 0 — L Y .•'•N C a Ov .ra= Op CVIJ Y 4Cd O:NU C p r Cul- •°c.L+ A ^y.N ..a .w OTC v °uA •O•' TJ� J• LV— Vq�f b vaLL C +d v V V C N CY N q q ✓ +� + M V N 4 O W r y d fN] V Y u �2� 0. d r q T a M L C V. �• O Y N G Y V p A + N O A L V AN CYi + +4 �'V+O 47 ON+ W4•v0 b C Q+ N d V r W yT Y V tt L 7 N - S N p u L C q P+ 6 b q V d •.. O u V W p a... N Y.+.+ q d T 4 T /•f c d v dC W wgLr +p a.0 +LO OA d y� O O Y P V C c MlL u d O � A O L n� '- WY O q •r- b Y P •� � L � 6 W C d o•�r. V O O 4 W r C d .� C C P•� u 4gY�0 Y.4 66 0.Jtd 4� JLL•� E El 0 0 Staff Report DR 81 -07 -2- j; June 10, 1981 of plant material and contains two buildings with an extensive over- head trellis structure between the buildings. The site is presently zoned C -2 and is General Planned for commercial uses. The property immediately to the east is an existing shopping center; Perry's Farm Market. West of Hellman is vacant - undeveloped land and south, approxi- mately 4001, is existing single family residential development. ANALYSIS; A significant amount of discussion occurred between the applicant and the Design Review Committee relative to the development of the immediate corner of Helms and Foothill Boulevard. The Committee felt that the size of the corner (ZO,000 sq. ft.), which is proposed to be split off from the larger piece of land would be too small for pro- per development and integration with the rest of the center. Please find attached as Exhibit "D" a site plan which indicates a conceptual arrangement of the building, parking, and circulatior system which the applicants feel will integrate the corner with the overall development. The Design Review Committee also had concerns relating to the inte- gration of this site with the existing shopping center. As a result of tr!e Design Review Committee's concern, the applicant has arranged to utilize the existing driveway into the Center rather than creating ad- ditional access from Foothill Boulevard. No primary access is being proposed from helms Avenue. Only a service drive is being proposed from Helms which could be for the delivery plant material. Attached is the Illustrative Site Plan which indicates the areas pro- posed to be landscaped as well as the type of screening being proposed along Helms Avenue. A combination of chainlink fence with wood posts and a wood cap is proposed along Helms Avenue in combination with mounding and landscaping. The remainder of the plant storage area is prod. ,)sed to be enclosed by standard chainlink fence and barbed wire. The Desig. , Review Committee spent a significant amount of time working with the applicant to resolve the site plan concerns relative to access and compatibi'ity with the adjacent center. However, the architectural design of the facility was not amicably worked out between the Design Review Committee and the applicant. The Design Review Committee exrressed concern over the original designs proposed by the applicant and in re- sponse the applicant prepared some refinements to the design. Also, additional desig,, concepts that could be utilized with the basic building structure were prepared by the architect and shown to the Committee. In review of the other concepts the Committee round them to be more desirable for Foothill Boulevard than the one desired by the applicant. As in previous cases along Foothill Boulevard, the Design Review Committee and the Planning Commission has strived for the quality building designs in order to promote the Special Boulevard character and policies of the General Plan. The Design Review Committee contends that the design desired by the applicant does not meet the Special Boulevard standards in terms of architectural treatment and would not promote the type and style that is desired for this location. Because of such, the Design Review Committee cannot recommend approval of this project with its 11 11 E Staff Report DR 81 -07 -3- June 10, 1981 present architectural design. The applicant was provided with the option of redesigning the project to meet the goals and policies of the General Plan or ge before the full Planning Commission for a final determination on the architectural design of the structure. Because of the applicant's desire not to deviate from the present proto- type standard design for the Woolworth Garden Center, this item is being brought before the Planning Commission for their guidance and direction in the matter. Because the applicant is unwilling to redesign the pro- ject to conform with Foothill Boulevard and Special Boulevard Standards, the Design Review Committee and the Staff is recommending denial of the project based upon the findings listed in the attached Resolution. Should the Commission vote not to deny the project based upon this design, then the Planning Commission should provide direction to the applicant relative to desired design improvements or direct Staff to prepare final conditions of approval for the development. If the Commission concurs with the Design Review Committee and denies the project based upon the findings listed within the Resolution, then Staff will bring forth the parcel map which would be dividing the pro - per•ty.to the Planning Commission for final action and recommendation of denial. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and consider the issues outlined within the Staff Report and any addi- tional areas which the Commission may find concern. Upon conclusion of such review, it is recommended that the Planning Commission render a decision to either deny the project based upon the attached Resolution or provide the necessary direction for the completion of this project. i tted , Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Exterior Building Elevations Resolution of Denial E k:'. N DRTH CITY OF ITEM: (-a� RANCHO CUCANIONGA TITLE: L-XATION WE � PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT:- A SCALE: N � S E � 2... ƒ} $ Ll I ' - a .. «.�......� &m2 m! q§ §& wva � f . � ` | | ■: / | �' \\ � � 2!\l W |s ®I « q# t . . � \.. . � \ { \. || $ a ; !« Z oil IL • 1111I v �J AOL t zz 04 4 ) ._: :� -, y � I °� rot 4i, �, E {� �� 9��dj I _ � all�t�� :H � tjsEa ��. FEi qq�� ti-�I�[y'I� env • 1111I v �J AOL t zz 04 • 1111I v �J SIN 7.7M y is _ IN" I AOL 04 4i, SIN 7.7M y is _ IN" I AOL Ell, a t I yl 014W 79USOV f4MvW✓ n. I / / / , , - a 4 .- , WAV W.- - q 4�1 ak it iN n r, at gulzouni, COL., a@emlel n)n t 1,4 L �JV�] L1 l/� U 1J � ^nQ `7 tJ V �J I I iII I �I 0 a �1�1 a f� �J � j} annnn n Orto L mm 11 -" i.- MOM 1: ts, 1 1 it � I� rn fill ll I Tri� I j -" i.- MOM 1: ts, 1 1 it � I� rn fill RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO (TUCATONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING DEVFLOP14ENT tEVIEW 140. 81 -07 FOR THE LEVELOPIENT OF A RETAIL GARDEN CENTER ON 1.9 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON Tb-1 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HELMS AVE14UE ANL FOOTHILL BOJLEVARD, WITHIN THE C -2 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 6th day of Febtuary, 1981, a complete application was filed by the Praver Brotlers for review of the above - describcd project; and, WHEREAS, on the 10th day of June, 1981, the Rancho Cucamnrga Planing Couunission held a meeting to consider the above - described project; and, WHEREAS, the Design Review Comiittee has reviewed the project with the applicant and has recom.icnded denial of the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cuc:.monga Planning Commission resolves as follows: 0 SECTION 1: The above - described project is denied as presently proposed, based upon the following findings: 1. The design of the proposed development is not consistent with the architectual desi ^es for Foothill Boulevard. 2. The design of the proposed development does not meet the Special Boulevard design c•iteria or design objectives of the General Plan. 3. The design of the proposed development will not be consistent or compatible with like commercial develop- ment contemplated by the General Plan, in the immediate vi.c�inity of the � jec: si(��` APROVED ANU ADOPTED TI1I9 `i0th D fY OF JUNE, 19* 81. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO :UCAMOt7GA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning, Commission R,er,0111tion No. Page 2 I, ;JACK LbM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the loth da- of Jur :c, 1981 by the following Planning to— wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: !`TOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �0'j Ell- - Q..TY OF RANCHO CiJOMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 10, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry r.. Hogan, City Planner BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: SCHEDULE FOR REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL_ SPECIFIC PLAN The Industrial Committee is nearing completion of their review on the Draft Specific Plan for the Industrial area. It is anticipated that the Committee will take action to recommend adoption at their meeting of June 11, .981. The draft documen* along with Industrial Committee recommendations review. Accompaningrt"isememo iseaptentativeosc begin hedule which theirthe Commission may wish to consider for their review and adoption of the Industrial Specific Plan. The schriule includes a study session where the draft Plan can be presented and discussed in a more informal session. Two public hearings for consideration and Plan approval are also inrluded. Following the manning Commission's action, the text will be revised in accordance with any reeomrenda tions by the Planning Commission and sub- mitted to the City Council for public review. June 24, 1981 - Planning Commission study session on the =ndustriai Specific Plan. July 8, 1981 - Planning Cemm'Ission review at the p:ablic hearing of the Draft Industrial Specific Plan. July 22, 1981 - Planning Commission consideration on recommendation for adoption of Draft Induatrial Specific Plan and review of Draft Environmental Report. RECOMMENDATION: Should the Planning Commission consider this schedule aceep- tabl4; it is recommended that they adopt this sc :iedule for public notice. pectful'A. submitted, B!4W:TJu:%� ITEM J U�. '... . . E IE CITY OF RANCHO C :MONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 10, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Cumss'on FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City P1ann BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate -Pa an er SUBJECT: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN /FOR INFORMATION ONLY Available for you at the meeting will be a copy of a Staff Report to the City Council, dealing with the preparation of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Also available for your comment will be a detailed scope of work for the Speci, , Plan outlining the various tasks to be accomplished during the Specific Plan process. While no action by the Planninj Commission has been requested, your thoughts and comments on the subject are welcome. The report and scope of work, along with your comments, will then be forwarded to the City Council for thtir review and consideration on June 17, 1981. EKH:OK:kp , ITEM L