No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/10/28 - Agenda Packetr, 'n 1 t ' I•' f 1 I � )� , A I .. ' vl Fd• 'I. 1 ; , � r F r y� , r q Ilr !J I �J 1 1 ! 1 'l 11 Y I I I I � +/ j 1 w 1 � , I r,{ i it F� 1 �� { 1 l , A r � • r { 1 � 1 �•'. l', Y 1 � li '1 ♦ l 1 '�1 l1 1f V 1, till _ 1 �.. \ n \1> •Y I ,1 1 V IyJY 1 [ u r '•11� < tir h!I yf\\ jY I 1 1 � 1 r I , Ibi 1 {J 1 i r, 'n 19» CITY Or RANTCHO CUCAmONGA PLANNING COMMISSION .AG�.NDA WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 28, 1981 7;00 p. m. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 1. Pledge of Alleginace Ii. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempel Commissioner King Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Sceranka _ --- III. Approval of Minutes 'August 12, 1981 August 26, 1981 September 9, 1987 September 23, 19 V uwv IV. Announcements �'ss V. Consent Calendar U-'"i'O. The following consent calender itszas are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time svithout discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, then it should be zemoved for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING• TT 9659 - Carnelian Investments TT 11459 - Prime Builders TT 11563 - Red Hill Partners TT 11013 - Brubaker TT 9619 - Hillside Vista TT 11564 - Landmark B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSIESSMEN7 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -32 - B.W.L.C. - The development of a .31,940 sq. � f- ndustrial building on 2.14 ac. of land in the General Industrial category located on the east side of Etiwanda, south of Arrow - APN 229 - 141 -13 .I Planning Commission Agenda -2- October 28, 1981 C. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11549 LR IS - A residential tract su ivisIon oo 2 acres into 90 lots in the R -1 zone generally located on the southwest corner of Summit and East Avenue - APN 225.181- 02 - -04, 06 - -09, 26 & 43. VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone bg giving your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 1 -0 T1 53 - AMERICAN NAT NA H —US ING �- C_ORPx - A total planned development of 72 —condo- ,_, minium units on 5,71 acres of land in the R -1- 8,500 zone located on the north side of 19th St. at Ramona Avenue - APN 209 - 171 -42 E%y ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE P R ITT -N0. -15 - BECK - The developmen t of �L a se f -serve car wash and gas station in the 6666 Industrial Park cetegory on 1 acre of land located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Blvd. - APN 209 - 142 -32 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO 11932 - E.J.L. - A custom lot suldivision of 2.7 acres o and into 10 lots in the R -1 zone located on the north side of Finch Avenue, went of Haven Avenue - APN 202 - 191 -15 G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 700 DeBOSE --A residential subdivision bdiv ion oT 4 acres Viand into 2 lots in the R -1 zone located on the south side of 19th Street, east of Jasper Avenue - APN 202 - 024 -15 Planning Commission Agenda VII. Old Business Vill. New Business IX. Council Referrals -3- October 28, 1981 X. Director's Reports REQUEST FOR DIRECTION ON THE POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AND HIGHLAND. XI. Public Comments This is the time and Place fcr the general public to address the Commission_ Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. XII. Upcoming Agenda XIII. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 P.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond th't ti:.:, they shall be heard Orly with the consent of the Commission. This regular meeting of the Planning Commission is adjourned to Tuesday, November 10, 1v311 at the Lion's Park Community Center, 7:00 p.m. ri Gr`' p a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting, August 12, 1981 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Jeffrey King called the Regular Mee +.ing of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, held in the Lion's Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, to order at 7 p.m. He then led In the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMIISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Jcff Sceranka, Herman Rempel Peter Tolstoy, Jeffrey King ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None STAFF PRESENT: Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Jack Lam, Director of Community Development; Paul Rougeau; Senior Civil Engineer; Michael Vairin, Senior Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceraulca, carried, to approve the February 5, 1981 Minutes. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, SCERANKA, TOLSTOY, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL -carried- Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to approve the February 25, 1981 Minutes. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, REMPEL, SCF.RANKA, TOLSTOY, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried- Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to approve the March 11., 1981 Minutes. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, SCERANKA, DAHL, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY - carried- Mr. Lam, Director of Community Development, advised that Item M of this agenda would be moved to follow Item P, dealing with the City's Redevelop- ment Agency. CONSENT CALENDAR A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -24 - KAJIMA - The development of a 30,220 square foot industrial building on 3.2 acres of land within the 14 -2 zone located on the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and Seventh Street - Parcels 15, 16, and 17 of Parcel Map 6194. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -27 - R.C. INDUSTRIAL - The development of 2 industrial warehouse /distribution buildings totaling 221,000 square feet on 13.1 acres of land in the M -2 zone located on the east side of Pittsburgh, south of 8th Street - AP14 229 - 261 -29 & 30. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -22 - 'LORD SHORE - The development of a 30,000 square foot warehouse facility on 5.02 acres of land in the M -2 zone to be located at 9120 Central Avenue - APN 209 - 262 -07. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt the Consent Calendar. h PUBLIC HEARINGS D. VARIANCC 1,10. 81 -02 - CHRISTIAN - Request to permit construction of residence that will encroach into front and rear yards on a 3,57°. square foot lot in the R -3 zone located at 6969 Amethyst - ,PN 202 - 131-04. Mr. Lam stated that the Assistant City Attorney had to make a determination as to the validity of the lot split and this was the reason this item had been postponed several times. Planning Commission Minutes -2- August 12, 1981 Mr.. Hopson stated that the history of this particular lot was difficult to determine inasmuch as the way subdivisioas have been allowed has changed back and forth over the past few years. He indicated, however, that this particular parcel was a legal lot split prior to 1967. Further, that any division of four or fewer parcels in San Bernardino County did not require a land division map prior to July 1, 1967. He indicated that on July 1, 1967, that was changed. Further, his office cannot be certain when the actual split took place other than the fact that it did occur prior to that time. Mr. Hopson stated that an assessors map exists which shows the lot split prior to that time and that before this it would have been legal to do this without the map; it is a legal lot, however, it is nonconforming. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin reviewed the staff report. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Charles Doskow, 222 Euclid Avznue, representing the applicant, stated the reasons for the variance for this parcel and asked for approval. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel stated that in looking at the lot he understood that in order to get use out of the lot, a house would have to be built on it. He thought, however, that a 2 -story house on that lot does not give proper appearance heading east to Monte Vista if it is built with the 25 -foot setback. lie indicated that if the applicant is given additional space that is sufficient for the front and rear setbacks, he felt that the lot is adequate without it being a 2 -story unit. Commissioner Rempel also cited the recent controversy relative to multi -story units next to single- family units and felt that this 2 -story unit would pre- sent the same problems. Commissioner Sceranka agreed with Commissioner Rempel in the inappropri- ateness of a two - -story unit in this neighborhood and stated he would agree with the use but not the 2- story. Commissioner Dahl stated his agreement with his fellow Commissioners that a 2 -story unit would not fit the property. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it was too bad that this is a lot on which a variance must be created; however, since it is a legal lot, the Planning Commission needs to go along. He agreed with Commissioner Rempel relative to the 2 -story house. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that perhaps with some creative design change in the use of a carport situation which would take away some of the scale of the building, and a loft situation, and keeping in mind at the same time that what the Commission is trying to do is keep the view from the 2 -story effect away from the side yards and the rest of the Planning Commission Minutes -3- August 12, 1981 neighborhood, the Design Review Coimnittee should be the determining factor. lie thought that a 2 -story would be impossible to put in but maybe some other design would work and it could be brought back. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -86, with the stipulation that the unit be redesigned in such a way as to mitigate the concerns of the Planning Commission and that this be brought back to the Design Review Committee for approval. 4: * * * * E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT D10. 81 -05 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY - The development of an electrical distribution substation located on 4.78 acres of land in the R-1 -20 zone, located on the northwest corner of Archibald "-venue and Wilson Avenue - APN 1061 - 571 -04. Mr. Lam advised that this item had been continued from a previous meeting in order for the applicant to provide additional information to the Commission. Further, that Mr. Dick Verrue, District Manager of Southern California Edison Company, would present that informa- tion. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Verrue stated that there had been several questions raised at the prior m -aetirg and that expert witnesses were not available at that time. Mr. Verrue introduced Mr. Jim DuBois, an engineer with the technical support group, to speak to the sound and noise; Mr. G. Cling with Bob Langston, architect and designer; Mr. Bill Slinger, telecommunications; Mr. Norm Cooch, attorney; and Mr. D1Natele, of the land appraisal. divi- sion. Mr. Verrue indicated that these people would be able to answer any questions the Commission might have. Mr. Verrue spoke of the site selection, noise interference, and visual impact and explained how electricity was transmitted in this area. lie provided background on how a determination is made that the area cannot be served due to growth. Mr. Verrue described the site selection of this particular plant pro- viding the factors which entered into the selection process for the substation. Commissioner Tolr•,toy stated that in relationship to site No. 2, he could not imagine that the County Flood Control District would be un- willing to release land for a site. Mr. Verrue replied that where were other impacts such as getting lines in aad out of Site No. 2. He indiated that because of the physical characteristics of the site, it would be difficult to get lines acrosf hillside. Planning Commission Minutes -4- August 12, 1981 Commissioner. Tolstoy stated that this both does and does not satisfy him. Further, that he would like to have Mr. Verrue provide him with information from the horses mouth rather than from some s':aff member at the Flood Control District that is not 100 percent sure. Iie further stated that he realized that it would be to Edison's advantage econom- ically to use existing facilities but, an a Commission member, he felt that there should be some pursuance of that. Mr. Verrue stated that site No. 2 is a little further north more than what Commissioner Tolstoy realized. Commissioner Tolstoy asked where the load center is and if it was at Archibald. Mr. Verrue replied that it was not and that it would actually be at item No. 3. Commissioner Tolstoy asked where the north -south load center is. Mr. Verrue replied that it was at 19th north -south and east -west it would be Hermosa over to the Flood Control. Further, that the load center is presently west of Hermosa. Commissioner Tolstoy asked, in Southern California Edison's forecast of Rancho Cucamonga and now that the General Plan is approved, where the load center will be? Mr. Verrue replied that it would presently be at site No. 1 and in 10 -15 years, east of Chaffey College. Chairman King asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition to this project. ?sir.. John Mannerino, attorney representing Mssrs. Tessier and partners who are landowners adjacent to this site, expressed extreme opposition on their behalf to this project. He stated that he noted Mr. Verrue had said that almost all sound levels will have been mitigated; however, these were the maximum sound levels as set forth in the County of San Bernardino Ordinance and felt that Edison had. side stepped the issue of presenting the facts. He thought that as the City's Planning Commission they had the right to request an EIR and thought that since there is a representation of property owners who would be affected by this sub- station, they would like the EIR completed prior to the C�,nmissi.on making a decision. Commissioner Sceranka asked if the intimation is that an economic EIR is what they are talking about. f1r.. Manner.i.no replied yes, because ultimately all the interferences, whether they are noise or others, will translate into economics. His clients, he stated, are interested in the economic impacts as they would translate into property values. Planning Commission Minutes -5- August 12, 1981 Mr. Hank Bouchett, 5605 Archibald Avenue, asked about the voltage drop of 6.7 per mile. He stated.that he was confused about the site selection and did not get adequate information. He further asked if the houses that Mr.. Verrue mentioned bad been sold in Lallabra were of equal value, disregarding; the cost. Commissioner Sceranka asked the applicant about site No. 2 and what the effect of selecting Site No. 2 was. lie was asked to make a comparison. Mr. Verrur_ replied that it is further north and further away from the load center. Additionally, the Flood Control. District would not give a blanket release of easements. He felt that it would be economically infeasi ble to do something with it. Commissioner Sceranka asked if the Demens Channel was done and if there was no possibility that they would be able to get some fill from it. He also asked Mr. Rougeau if the Flood Control District .could give a re- lease of their easements. Mr. Rougeau replied that the Flood Control District is reluctant to give up its easements. Commissioner To'lstoy commented that the Flood Control District is ten- acious. Once they have property, they don't like to give it up. There being no further comments, the p�iblic hearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel stated that there is nowhere in the City north of Foothill that putting in a substation would have anything but an adverse effect on the residential community. Further, that there may be no residences in the area at the time but there will be future residences. He stated that when it comes to the final decision, that is the way the Commission will have to look at it. Commissioner Dahl asked for his edification how many people were here because of this issue. About one -half of the audience, or about 20 people raised their hands. He stated that in looking at this, he could not help but see that a location is needed and that Edison needs to come into this area but he was having some 1--oblem with the reason that Edison had chosen site No. 1 versus 2 and 3. He indicated that cost shocld be examined anti that he wanted to loot: out for the public and Edison's interest. He thought that the attorney for the land owners made a good statement and stated that he would like an economic impact report before making his decision. He stated that he could not support this tonight and would like to have an EIR. He further stated that he had asked Edison previously to do some research on possible other locations but had not seen this done. Further, that it was not stated that there were no new sites. Planning Commission Minutes -6- August 12, 1981 Chairman King stated that if the Cot.•mission feels that an EIR is needed, that is fine. He further stated tLat he has sat through two public hearings on this substation and h, personally did not feel that the location of this project is appropriate. Chairman King stated that he had a problem with aesthetica and the safety in a single- family residential area. He felt that at build out it may change whero—_'In should be. He stated that personally he did not feel that he would be in favor of this project. 8:10 p.m. The Planning Comm {sblon recessed. 8:20 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. Commissioner Sceranka stated that this issue is caught up on whether there are other appropri.ate.sitea in the City or whether there are other sites in the City that will have less impact if the substation is built there. Further, in order to determine a solution to this., Edison's statements of sites A or B and 1 and 2 will not do the job. Commissioner Sceranka stated that we wi17. have to take a look at the available sites within the City and set up criteria of major point.). He =sked that a study be done by an independent consultant or by some- one deemed acceptable by the Commission to come back to the Commission with: 1. The economic impact on the sites that are available. 2. Adjacent user impacts in terms of who is next door to the user and whether the site impact is significant. 3. Feasibility of putting the facility there at all from a practical standpoint of whether they can put the facility in a flood control zone or whatever. He said he is open to suggestions from the Commission as to who should make the study. Commissioner Dahl stated that if we are to do this and this is recommended by the Commission, he would like to ask staff if possible to have such a study which will be underwritten by the Edison Company. Mr. Lam stated that if such a written by Edison. He stated application, the Commission c, ing on with the project, they what the Commission should do determine. study is done, it would have to be under - further that if they wish, to pursue the )uld request that as a condition of carry- have this study done. Mr. Lam stated that is set the scope of what the study should Plan=ing Commission Minutes -7- August 12, 1981 Commissioner Dahl asked Commissioner Sceranka if he wished to make a motion of those points he wanted covered in the study. Commissioner Sceranka replied th.. -_ first a determination should be made of who will do the study. Commissioner. Sceranka moved that such a study be done, but felt the motion was incomplete without stating who would do the stuffy. Mr. Lam stated that what the Commission must do is set the scone of what the study should determine and if Edison will do the study, all right. Otherwise, staff will have to do a request for proposal. He stated that the Planning Commission sh uld carefully consider whether they have finalized all these concerns. The reason was, he said, that if you say points A, B and C, and later on, it would only be fair to the applicant to specifically define all the area, that should be discovered. Commissioner Dahl stated that one of the things that had been stated is that this study should be without regard to options, A or B, 1, 2, 3 or 4 and that there be research to other possible sites throughout the area that would be of service to the area concerned. He indicated that this list should not just be a choice of the on�•s that have been presented here. Further, that Edison has previously been requested to look at alternative sites and report back to the Commission and that there really has been no change. Chairman King stated that he would agree that what Commissioner Sceranka says has to be done, but rather than having Edison pay for an outside consultant, felt that the Edison Company should do the study. It appeared to him that the information that they had provided to the Commission thus far is accurate and that they have the capability to do this kind of study in :souse. Commissioner Sceranka added to his motion that the Edison Company would do the study and restated his three concerns. Commissioner Dahl seconded the motion and Chairman Kii :-. called for the question. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, DAHL, TOLSTOY, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried- Mr. Lam stated that he had been asked during the recess if any decis'L•-1r. made at this meeting tonight could be appealed to the City Council. He indicated to whoever had asked the question, that the answer is yes, within 14 days of the Planning Commission decision. Planning Commission Minutes -8- August 12, 1981 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS1NT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10210 - LAWLOR - A custom lot subdivision of 46 acres into 38 lots comprising of 36 units in the R -1- 20,000 zone and R -1 -14 acre zone generally located on the north side of Almond between Sapphire and Turquoise - APN 200 - 161 -12, 200- 151 -06, 1061 - 172 -03. G. ENVIUOM ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 81 -01 -• LAWLOR - A request to change the zone from R -1 -14 to R-1- 20,000 to be con- sistent with the zoning to the west. This area is a portion of Tentative Tract No. 10210. The balance of the tract is zoned for the intended use. Chairman King stepped down because of a possible conflict of interest. Vice- chairman Rempel took the chair. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner. Dahl asked staff a question about the numbering system for lots and the difference between it and the tract boundaries. Mr. Vairin replied by explainii.g that the County had a different numbering system at the time the previous staff report was prepared. Commissioner Sceranka commented on the recommendation made by staff regarding the negative vote and asked if in terms of flood control and lot to lot drainage not being adequately addressed and the impact as a result of the amount of lots proposed, if there had been any change that might mitigate that recommendation? Mr. Vairin repl.led no, that relat've to the cross lot drainage there have not been any details provided on how the flow would occur nor how it would be taken into appropriate drainage structures. Commissioner Sceranka asked if there had been a disagreement between the applicant and engineering, did they not do their studies, or why was it incomplete? Mr. Vairin explained the drainage analysis was prepared on the overall project and not on an individual lot basis and it was just staff's statement that taking the lots which are not supposed to be graded at this time was inadequate. The applicant had provided a conceptual grading, plan with the feeling that anything more was not required at this time. Commissioner Sceranka asked if the applicant had shown adequate drainage let to lot would that be sufficient to mitigate the concern for density? Mr. Vairin replied affirmatively. Planning Commission Minutes -9- August 12, 1981 Commissioner Sceranka asked if in terms of fire response time the isn't something that would mitigate. this? Fir. Vai.rin replied that the applicant has worked a lonj time to resolve this problem and that Tract No. 10210 meets the response time. The applicant, he stated, had even offered a site for a ne_,rfire station. Commissioner Sceranka aske.l if flame retardant landscaring were planted around the perimeter of the site, would this mitigate come of the fire :oncerns? Mr. Vai.rin replied that the Fire District had stated teat they would reoui.re at a minimum such fire retardant material. P::::sently they require a 50 -foot clearance around new developments of this nature. Mc. Vairin then explained the 7- minute response time. Commissioner Sceranka asked what the difference is between this custom lot subdivision and other subdivisions. Commissioner Tolstoy replied that that is irrelevant :nd that the Commission should go on to the public hearing. Vice- cha_rrman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. Greg Lawlor, 6120 Avenida Chamez, LaJolla, the applicant, stated that he had met with the fire district and f-bey had iniicat: d to him that his tract is wi.thiti the response time for all arets in Alta Loma. Ee explained the projects that he had designed and developed and the awards he had received. He stated his feeling that a ..arge custom lot subdivision of luxury homes is needed and that the present average size of 1.25 dwelling, units per acre with a 3/4 acre minimum was in keeping with the zoning for the area. Mr. Leon Kedding, C. M. Engineering, Associates, stated that this project was filed one year ago. Be indicated that there was th> realization that there would be design constraints but that they we,e not in viola- tion of the Hillside standards. Further, that there a.r� some relatively flat areas within the project. He stated that the northern and western boundary is Cucamonga Creek and is about 25 feet below the level of this subdivision which would afford drainage protection. He explained the road that enters into the National Forest and stated th<t the Forest Service wants them to pave this road. Mr. Kedding explained how they would channel drainage into the Almond interceptor and also explained cross lot drainage, which he said, would be satisfied. Mr. Kedding advised the Commission of the.r meeting with the fire district indicating that they were willing to provide a site for a new station on their property. He commented on the concerns expressed by staff with people coming into the area and traversing the fire service road. lie felt that the Fire Service wants to control people coming into the area. Planning Commission Minutes -10- Augiist 12, 1981 Mr. Kedding advised that they would provide a system of irrigation to keep the perimeter of the subdivision in a green state which would be a part of the homeowners association within the development. He also advised of the fault lines and the geologic conditions of the area as well as the grading which would take place, stating that they will en- courage minimum grading of the lots. Commissioner Tolstry asked how they propose to control minimum grading. Mr. Kedding replied that if not more than four lots are involved, it would be done through Design Review. They did not feel that it would be any different than a mountain are. where large pads are at a minimum. Mr. Kedding further stated that this development is within. 660 feet of other developments, at Turquoise, and also at Almond and Sapphire. He indicated that just because it is at a northernmost point does not mean that it is a premature development in this area. Mr. Vern Woodring, 8242 Belle Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that he would welcome this subdivision because the City has :ailed to maintain Almond. He indicated that it will also provide flood control. Mr. Woodring stated that because this development is above the 20,000 square foot requirement of this area, he felt it would not be looked at the same way that a planned community or condominiums would be. Mr. Frank Williams, representing a property owner to the northeast, Mrs. Gertrude Hartman, had a concern with access and asked that it be provided to her south boundary line or with dedication of future access near her southern boundary line. Mr. Fred Schulhof, owner of most of the property under discussion to the east, stated that when he developed thi.z property, Tract No. 7595, he asked surrounding property owners to assist i:: building a road to this property by contributing to curb, gutter, street and water, and they replied, "no ". They refused to go along with it. - Mr. Schulhof stated chat there is access to the east through their own property and there is not any more difference that what is being developed. Mr. Williams stated that the conditions of approval require two accesses for future development. Mr. Chuck Morgan, 8234 Almond, owner of adjacent property to the east, objected to the density of this project stating that becausa this is Hillside, it is not condusivc to one -half acre parcels. He also stated that the topo map was not accurate. Mr.. Lloyd Dorsey, 7835 Almond, stated that he was opposed to the proposed density of this project and indicated that the roadways in this area were such that he could buy - new car every six months and in that time it would be the equivalent of a five -year old car. Planning Commission Minutes -11- August 12, 1981 There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Vairin clarified the zoning'of this project and the zoning ordinance for the audience and stated that the allowance of the proposed densities is totally up to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Dahl stated that he would have to go with the new map designations and indicated that he would have to agree with the gentlemen who made the stateu:ent about lots 32 -36 being substandard and subsize because of the usable lot size when considering the grade. He felt that lots 60 -62 were also of this type and should be combined. He indicated that he was opposed to the amount of density within this subdivision and took exception ro the developers remarks about not being concerned with the grading and ievelopmer.t of the pads within_ this project. Commissioner Dahl felt that the flood and water control, as it is being looked at today, was all right and he had no problems with that. Further that the main problem with this tract is lot size and the way is laid out. Commissioner Dahl did not think that the topographical map is accurate. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the first time he could remember discussing this was at 1 a.m. when the Commission had Just gone through the General Plan with Hillside Residential. He indicated that this is a sensitive area for a number of reasons and that he had sonic real problems with this project. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that from the health and safety aspects, these are where the problems are. Additionally, the flood problem is great. He indicated that a new owner coming into this custom lot subdivision will do whatever he can to drain any water into the street. lie (lid not feel that the developer has taken into consideration the lot without drainage. Another problem is the fire situation, he said. If. there_ are no more fund:. for this area, the level of service will go from low to practic- ally nil and he stated this was a big problem. Also, if you increase density in this area it will create problems. He cited the fault problem and high density as the largest to overcome. He indicated that this should be Hillside Residential zoning. Commissioner Rempel stated that he would not comment on density because he was unable to answer that question from his experience. He indicated that cross lot drainage is what makes a hillside area. He indicated that if you do very much to these lots it will destroy the natural effect. Commissioner Rempel commented on the seismic area stating that if a stick- - built house was put almost on the fault, it would not go down and would be safer in an earthquake. He stated further that as far as lot size, these lots are not large enough and the topo map does not really show the area realistically. He felt that a nice split level where you have a 30 percent slope would be a nice attribute and the rest of the tract Is well laid out and would be a benefit to the community. He indicated that the minimum lot should be around one acre rather than 3/4 acre. Planning Commission Minutes -12- August 12, 1981 a: Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he could not imagine having any grading on these lots. His concern is that when swimming pools, decks and tennis courts are installed and begin draining you will not really know what the drainage will be. What he was saying was that when you do a piece of land all at once you know what it will be but you don't w ^.o, when it is done piece by piece. Mr. Vairin stated that staff can look at that and get into details. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he had one big concern regarding access into the forest service area. He felt that anyone buying into this sub- division would not want to have people coming through the gate to enter into the national forest. He felt that density must be deemed feasible and the lot size should not be less than the 3/4 acre. He felt that whether it was 3/4 acre or one -acre did not make a lot of .'-Ifference. He felt that the lower section of this subdivision is adequate with the exception of the fire road. Commissioner Dahl pointed out that some lots are too steep and do not have good usable land and, therefore, this project was too dense. Mr. Vairin stated that possibly this could be gone over with the appli- cant and worked out if this is Lhte lirection that the Planning Commission wished to take. Commissioner Rempel stated that when the Commission begins talking about these grades, they would need to go to Sierra Madre and La Canada and look at those ar=aa first. He did not necessarily think that grading is a detriment to building a unit. Commissioner Dahl stated that he would caution the developer in coming back on the second eection to look at density because it is too high. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that there is far too much density in this tract. Mr. Vairin stated that the Commission is looking at the absolute minimum 1•Jt size. Coca°?usioner Tolstoy stated that when they are asked to look at these impacts, they can't read the maps and it is not fair to ask them to give much direction. Mr. Vairin recommended that the Commission have the Design. Feview Committee work on this. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, that this project go back to Design Review for mitigation of the concerns voiced by the Commission. Planning Commission Minutes -13- August 12, 1981 Commissioner Seeranka asked a question relative to the fire issue and stated that he felt that this tract has serious problems with fire response time. He asked that this be carefully looked at in Design Review. Commissioner Dahl stated that he had another concern with the fire issue and stated that along the west end of the property there is a pla.c-, where the road drops from the property into the Cucamonga Wash. Mr. Vairin stated that this is not adjacent to this tract, that it is down Almond. Vice - chairman Rempel stated that if you are really asking for trouble. they go up for fire access. this is put at the tract boundary, lie indicated that it is better if Cemni.ssioner Sceranka stated that he felt this to be a serious problem. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that for those people who will be considering this tract in Design Review, the densities should not come back the same. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to continue the proposed zone change on this project. 9:45 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 10:00 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. li. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -12 - MILLS - The instruction of ceramic art techniques in conjunction with a ceramic manufacturing, wholesale/ retail use in an existing building in the M -2 (Industrial Park) zone located at 10722 Arrow Route, Suite 610. Commissioner Sceranka stepped down because of a possible conflict of interest. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. Vice - chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel., seconded by Tolstoy, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -87. Planning Commission Minutes -14- August 12, 1.981 I. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -11 - FOOTHILL INDEPENDENT BANK - The development of a temporary moaular bank facility of 720 square feet on .94 acres of land in the C -2 zone to be used during construction of a permanent bank facility at 9709 Base Line Avenue - APN 1077- 011 -461. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development reviewed the staff report. Chairman Lung opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the floor, the public hearing wes closed. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -88, approving this project. J. EN "IR617MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZCNE CHANGE NO. 81 -02 - LEWIS - A proposed change of zone from R -1 (single - family residential) to R- 1- 20,000 (single - family re- idential 20,000 square foot lot minimum) on 52 acres of land located on the south side of Summit Avenue, between Etiwanda and East Avenues - APN 225 -181 -4 through 9, 26, and 43. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reviewed the staff report. Chairman king opened the public hearing. There being no comments for or against this project, the public nearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -89 approving this zone change and issuing a negative declaration. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 7012 - CRESCENT BUSINESS CENTER Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. lie indicated that there is an amendment to the Conditions of Approval, items 45 and 46 of the City Engineer's report, where the word parking was I nadvertently put in. Commissioner Tolstoy asked what kind of agreement is drawn up so that the City can be assured of proper upkeep. Mr. Rougeau replied that this is done through CC &R's. Planning Commission Minutes -15- August 12, 1981 Mr.. Hopson stated that it is their policy to include cities as an interest holder, for purposes of guaranteeing that the CC&R's will be fullfilled and so that the city can intercede. They also require the city's concurrence in amendments so that the City cannot be amended out of the CC &R's. Mr. Rougeau continued that there are not many improvement conditions necessary as this project is practically built. One other item is needed, however, that is the median island to be installed in Archibald. He indicated that they are attempting to get a'development lein which should be reviewed by the City Engineer and attorney because the lack of definite costs and time periods make it difficult in obtaining a loan. lie suggested that in lieu of this, an appropriate amount of money could be put into an interest bearing account to provide for the construction of the island in the future. Chairman King opened the public hearing. The applicant stated that he concurred with these conditions and the public hearing was closed as there were no further comments. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -90 *with the changes as recommended. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 81 -03 Amending the Zoning Ordinance, Section 61.023(f) establishing a SP (Specific Plan) classification to implement the Industrial Specific Plan in the area generally defined as extending south of Arrow Highway to the City boundary between Grove and Haven and extending south of Foothill Bculevard to the City boundary between Haven and the eastern City boundary. Tim Beedle, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman King opened the public_ hearing. There being no comment, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -91, approving the zoning ordinance amendment and issuing a negative declaration. Item M was continued to later in the agenda. Planning Commission Minutes -16- August 12, 1981 OLD BUSINESS N. REVISION TO DAON LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 80 -13 Senior. Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Tolstoy asked, if along with the plans submitted by the developer, was there any text that went with the submittal? Mr. Vairin replied that sometimes there is technical information that is included. Commissioner. Dahl stated that what he is saying is that these did not show up on the plan of the developer and were dropped. Mr. Vairin replied that a letter had been given to the developer which conditioned the plan. However, the site superintendent had gone ahead and constructed the project because he did not know the additional planters were supposed to be there. Mr. Corrigan, representing the Daon Corporatlon, explained how this happened and felt it unfair, since he was against the screening, to put these in now. He indicated that nothing had ever been shown on this. Mr. Vairin replied that for the record there mere two letters from the !Tanning Commission that went out that showed what the requirements were and included the planters. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it wouit! seem that this is a no win situation. Mr. Corrigan stated that he would like to thank each and every Commissioner for their help. He indicated that they have an excess of 18 percent of landscaping„ and had the planters been put in, felt that they would have- run into serious problems down the line. He indicated that lie. had pro- vided a letter to Mr. Vairin requesting final write off on this project and did not want the Commission to do anything, on this project that would not be done on any other. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he felt this should be overlooked this time. lie further stated that this whole problem arose because of a com- munication gap and that this is an excellent project. Mr. Corrigan stated that this is a fast track project and if that con- dition was recommended by the Planning Commission, he missed it. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to waive the requirement for the planters in the parking lot. Commissioner Dahl asked how many trees were involved in this condition waiver. Planning Commission Minutes -17- August 12, 1981 Mr. Vairin replied that there were six trees and some ground cover. NEW BUSINESS O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 81 -28 - WOOLWORTH GARDEt7 CENTER - The do 'elopment of a retail garden center on 1.9 acres of land in the C -2 zone to be located 100 feet east of Helms on the south side of Foothill - APN 208- 261 -43 6 44. commissioner Sceranka stepped down due to a possibly conflict of interest. Michael. Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the next time LJoolworth submits a request, they should do a better job with the renderings. Chairman King asked if the applicant wished to comment. Mr. Praver, the applicant, replied that the conditions are acceptable. Commissioner Dahl stated that this is a tremendous improvement over what had been originally submitted and would be a benefit to the adjacent shopping center. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that this is quite an improvement although he still had some concerns. tie asked for the Planning Commission's support to add a little more landscaping in the way of one or two more tree wells in the parking area. He indicated that this is a very impor- tant corner in what will happen in the revisions to Perry's Market. He hoped that this would shame Mr. Perry into doing more for his parking lot. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there was any kind of an agreement for tenants in the area for a new sign. Mr. Vairin replied that there is not a condition but there is a. comment in the staff report that such a sign would be required. Further, that Mr. Perry has been in the process of redesigning the sign. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he liked the wrought iron i .dea but still had some concern with the corner and whatever future thing it is going to be. He indicated that when the area on the corner is developed, it needs to be integrated with the whole site. Commissioner Rempel stated that in Design Review that is a factor.. Commissioner Dahl asked where they desire to put the tree. Mr. Vairin replied it should go right in the middle. Planning Commission Minutes -18- August 12, 1981 Motion: Moved by l:empel., seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -92 with the conditions of approval. P. 41011 Community Development Director, Jack Lamy reviewed the staff report. He then intrcd_ced three members of the consulting firm, Municipal Services, Incorporated, to the Commission. Mr. Manny DeDios, of M.S.:.., in his presentation recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the project area from within the survey area. He explained how they arrived at the project area in deliberations between staff, the redevelopment agency and the attorney for the agency. Further, as listed in the table of contents of the preliminary survey area, the requirements were as listed and were intended to facilitate_ what the City Council. and the Planning Commission had decide¢ upon. He indicated that this plan is different from other plans in the state in that no eminent domain is proposed. lie indicated that a public hearing will be held at which time this question will again come up. Commissioner Tolstoy asked in the consideration in siting the project area was the old Alta Loma area ever considered? Mr. DeDios replied that it had not been considered and that other neighbor- hoods and other commercial areas were. He advised the Commission of the time constraints and further, that this would not preclude taking this area under the redevelopment- mantle at some future point In time. Commissioner Tolstoy asked why there was such a rush in time. Mr. DeDios explained the need for funds in flood control and the special. tax increment financing and its dependence on the increase In property tax revenues due to raw land. development. Commissioner Sceranka stated that if the deadline is not met by January 1, 1982, the P_edevelopment Agency would lose its taxing ability and would have to wait until Augurs of 1982.' Commissioner Tolstoy wanted to know why certain areas were considered and again asked if in the future other areas may be added to the re- development plan. Mr. DeDios explained the options that would be available and how addition- al project areas could be added. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if this means that you would go through the hearing process to get these added. Mr. DeDios replied, yes. Planning Commission Minutes -19- August 12, 1981 Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there could be an island somewhere? Mr. DeDios replied that there could be but if you have a non - contiguous area you must prove that they are blighted, need redevelopment, or that they need low -or- moderate - income housing. Mr. DeDios stated that the Redevelopment Plan Program con.templated by this city really intends to facilitate the General Plan in terms of consistent orderly growth. Its basic intent is to capitalize on paying for improvements that have been a deterrent to the development of the City. Commissioner Dahl asked if infrastructure is being discussed and whether they would be in the areas of North Town, Victoria and the Deer Creek Channel. Mr. DeDios replied that the areas being considered are those which have been summarized and graphically illustrated in Figure No. 3 of the Pre- liminary Plan and that only those improvements are being considered. Mr. DeDios stated that the City Council serves as the Redevelopment Agency and the law cloaks them with the authority to make decisions and sees to the establishment of priority. Iie indicated that this would take care of the flooding problem and that they have only briefly been talking about one form of financing. He further indicated that there are other methods that could be harnessed for improvements other than what he has talked about. Mr. Sam Angona, resident of Rancho Cucamonga, stated that in addition to Deer. Creek and Day Creek he was concerned with the financing of future development and asked if Alta Loma Channel could also be included. He thought that this is a priority. He felt that in smaller developments, those areas that were not contiguous --nd therefore will not put in any improvements and stated that this was not fair. Iie indicated that the cost is staggering and that their engineering estimate is about $500 per foot. He stated further that on a 5 acre parcel this will be about $500,000, and he felt that this should also be included in the redevelop- ment plan. Mr. Lam stated that as far as Alta Loma Channel is concerned, they have always tried to get property owners to come up with an assessment district and they have never wanted to talk to each other. Mr, tngona stated that it is not a problem for people living inside because it is not a condition for development and that he can't get them to talk. Commissioner Tolstoy commented that he did not know whether this would go into redevelopment or not but that Alta Loma Channel. choul.d have the interest to be looked at. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that Mr. Angona said that those people living 500 feet away from the channel do not have any interest in its development. Ile indicated that strong leadership should be taken so that interest can hr_ developed because the channel's Planning Commission Minutes -20- August 12, 1981 improvement will affect the development of those properties; as well. Ne indicated the Planning Commission, at some point in time, will say you can develop your property if you put in a storm drain and it will mean that Alta Loma Channel must be developed. Mr. Jim Frost, Council member, stated that he has a personal philosophy regarding the Redevelopment Agency but felt that it represented some of the Commission as well as some of the Council members- He concurred with some of Commissioner Dahl's statements in that we need to review redevel- opment and its purpose to be sure that it serves as a t •Jenue source for reasons of magnitude or other reasons, that could take care of the Alta Loma Channel and other problems not necessarily of a regional nature. Another consideration, he stated, is tax increment fundings, as this would give the Commission and Council the option of where this money should be spent. He indicated that there is a need to select those uses with great care. Commissioner Dahl. thanked Council member. Frost- for his comments, stating that they clarified the Council's thinking. Mrs. Jeffrey King, Alta Loma resident, asked if the project area included the Alta Loma channel, where exactly would that be expanded to? Mr.. Lam replied that it would be in a very strange way and that you would have to find a way to do that. Mr. Lam stated that his only response to why the area was selected in the way that it was is to keep it as simple as possible because of the time constraints. He indicated that they want to have those areas with the highest priority like Day Creek, those areas where under passes are needed, grade crossings, major flood control., off ramp modifications, etc., considered first. He indicated that these are of a magnitude to provide that assistance and are the most favorable for tax increment funding. tie stated that this does not preclude other project areas that he could name. He indicated that this is a question of selection of priorities so if you can do a good job on the first one, you can build credibility in the future. Mrs. King stated that she drew the inference from the comments that the Alta Loma Channel is going to be built prior to the other storm drains mentioned and asked if this was correct? Mr. Lam explained that in the case of the Alta Loma Channel, there are conditions of approval. for development that may occur along that chanocl. What he is talking about, he said, is whether there is a "fairer" way to spread the responsibility for those improvements. He indicated that there are other ways, and yes, if the philosophy of the Council is such, they may desire in future years to include this. However, there is another way, through an assessment district, to develop this now at a more reason- able cost. Planning Commission Minutes -21- August 12, 1981 Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -93, to receive the Assessment of Conditions Report, designating a redevelopment project area and adorting a pre- liminary plan for the redevelopment project area. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to continue beyond the 11 p.m. curfew. M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT_ PROJECT - Coirmients in advance of preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Redevelopment Project Area. A study area to determine ultimate redevelopment project- boundaries. Mr. Beedle indicated that the public hearing can be opened and reviewed the staff report. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Commissioner Rempel asked since an EIR exists on the General Plan and the Industrial. Specific Plan, and if the Redevelopment Plan covers these areas, is a new Environmental Impact Report necessary? M:. Beedle replied that in order to follow the procedure, i.t is necessary. Mr. Lain stated that the City would be dead in the water without one. Mr. Hopson stated that it is required in order to see if it will work. He indicated that reasonable men may differ and if that is the case, a new EIR may as well be prepared. Mr. Lam stated that as Mr. Beedle had indicated, this. EIR will borrow heavily on those prepared for the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan. Mr. Hopson stated that under discussion will be mitigation measures and the like. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Remy.el, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the Redevelopment Project. ADJOURNZT -,NT Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Rempel., carried unanimously, to adjourn. Planning Commission Minutes -22- August 12, 1981 •, ��' [ - 1. C. 1. •< 1; 1 . 1 . adjourned. fit,'• •A; � �1. Respectfully submitted, r. JACK LAM, Secretary t � 1' di 1. 1 i1. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA PLANNING CO?4 MISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting August 26, 1981, CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, held at the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, was called to order by Chairman Jeffrey King at 7:00 poa. Chairman King then led in the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Herman Rempel.. Jeff Sceranka, Peter Tolstoy, Jeffrey I:ing ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None STAFF PRESENT: Robert Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney; Jnck Lam, Director of Community Development; Michael Vai.rin, Senior Planner; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil. Engineer; and Janice Reynolds, Secretary APPROVAL OF 1:INUTES Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Dahl, carried unamiously to approve the Minutes of March 12, 1981. Motion: Muved by Rempel, seconded by Dahl, carried, to approve thr Minutes of March 25, 1.981. with a correction to page 18 in the 11th paragraph to correct the last sentence to read "He indicated that the County Building De_part:ment required it to be removed and put back in properly ". Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to approve the Minutes of March 26, 1981. Commissioner Dahl abstained from vote as he was absent from that meeting. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unamiously, to approve the Minutes of April 2, 1981. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unamiously, to approve the Minutes of April 8, 1981, with a correction that the meeting was a Regular Meeting and not an Adjourned Meeting. Q, . : ANNOUNC04ENTS Mr. Lam announced.ti,at the Citizens Advisory Commission would be meeting on August 27, 1981, at the Lion's Park Community Center, I•ancho Cucamonga, at 7:00 p.m. He also invited the Planning Commission to ettend a bus field trip on Sunday, August 30, at 10 a.m. with the Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory Committee to tour the Etiwanda area.. He further announced that the RLS project was referred back to the Planning C07-Mission from the City Council. and requested that the Commission place :his item on the agenda for tonight's meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL i`1AP NO. 7007 - I:kON CORPORATION - A division of 9.649 acres into 3 parcels within the M -2 zone located on the southeast corner of Haver. Avenue and Civic Center Drive APN 208 -35 -03 & 11. Mr. Paul Rau,-eau, Senior Civil. Engineer, presented the S aff Report and advised the Commission that it was the applicant's desir.+ to continue this item to the September 9, 1981 Planning Commission nu eting to gite them more time to prepare a Conceptual. Site Plan as per llanning Com- mission policy. Chairman King opened the public hearing and no one spoke In favor or opposition to the continuance, therefore the public heari.�g was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Tolstoy, carried un.tmiously, to continue Environmental Assessment and Parcel Nap No. 1007 to the Sep- tember 9, 1.981 Planning Commission meeting. B. ENVTRONMENTAL AS.IESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6937 - PI.REZ - A residential subdivision of 2.41. acres into 4 parcels within the R -l. zone located on the southwest corner of Viccor.ia and ',art Avenue - APN 227 - 121 -41. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, presented the Sta`f Report. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Rougeau how definitive the circulation would be in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Mr. Rougeau replied that circulation would be defined similar to that in the Industrial Specific Plan in that it would set locations for major streets. Chairman King opened the public hearing Planning Commission Minutes -2- Augusl 26, 1981 Mrs. Perez, the applicant, stated that her only comment was that she was of the opinion that. her project met . all the City Standards and hoped the wc.,1d be allowed to develop her project as it was being presented to the Commission. Mike Perez, son of the applicant, stated that his intention was to equip his home with solar collectors and if the location of his house was changed by the Commission, he would not be able to do this. Mr. Jim Banks, Etiwanda resident, stated that the circulation was a major problem in this location and thought it should be fully addressed by the Commission. Ile further stated that if East Avenue was to become a secondary street with four lanes, the applicant should be advised of this. Marsha Banks, Etiwanda resident, asked what the size c£ the lot facing East Avenue would be if the street were widened. Mr. Rougeau replied that it would be 108' wide. Mrs. Banks stated that she did not see how this lot would then be deemed as compatible with other 'lots in the area. Mr. Rougeau replied that by compatible he meant in conformity with the General Plan. Mrs. Bank -:z stated that she thought that the circulation situation in this area needed further study and that access problems needed to be resolved. T1,ere were no further comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Rougeau. if the issues of circulation would be resolved in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Mr. Rougeau replied that it would be studied as part of the Plan. Commissioner Tolstoy asked how the widening of Victoria would affect the dimensions of the property. Mr. Rougeau replied that it would not affect the width. of the property but would affect the setback. There was fu:t_her discussion on the circulation and lot configurations of the property. It was proposed by Commissioner Rempel that the Com- mission direct Staff to work with the applicants and to continue this item to a later agenda. Planning Commission Minutes -3- August 26, 1981 Chairman king asked the applicants if they wished the Commission to take action on the Parcel Map at this meeting, or if it was their desire to work with Staff to find some solutions to their problems. The applicants replied that they would continue action on the Parcel Map to a later date. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Rempel, carried unamiously, to continue Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map No. 6937 to September 23, 1981. 8:00 P.M. The planning Commission recessed. 8:10 P.M. The Planning Commission reconvened. C. EJVIRODPfENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 7088 - WENGER AND ZWICKER - A division of 173.70 acres into 2 parcels in the M -2 zone located on the northwest corner of 4th Street and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 229- 283 -29. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner Sceranka asked what improvements would be required. Mr. Rougear replied that all improvements were to be put off to a later date. Commissioner Rempel asked where 7th Street was proposed to come into on this parcel. Mr. Rcugeau replied that it was proposed to get the dedication from the north side of the parcel. There would be a full dedication for 7th Street obtained from Parcel 1. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Ray Glidder, representing Wenger and Zwicker, stated that this project was a proposal to prepare the land for a very large corporation to come into Rancho Cucamonga and requested the Planning Commission to accept his project as proposed. There were no further comments on the Parcel Map and the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Rempel, carried unamiously to adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 7088. Planning Commission Minutes -4- August 26, 1981 D. ENVIRNONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 6969 -KEY - A residential subdivision of 2.08 acres of.land into . parcels in the R -1- 20,000 zone located on the north side of Vicara Drive, west of Jasper Street - APN 1061 - 141 -06. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner Dahl asked Mr. Rougeau what the dimensions of the lots would be after dedication. Mr. Rougeau replied that the lot dimensions would be about 170X130 after dedication. There being no further questions or comments from the Commission, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Bill Roth, present owner of the parcel, addressed the Commission stating that the proposed development met with his desires and hoped that the Commission would accept the project as proposed. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy, carried unamiously, to adopt. the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 6962. E. ENVIROPIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6582 - PRAVE•R BROTHERS INVESTMENTS - A commercial development of 6.4 acres into four (4) parcels in the C -2 and R -i zones located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard east of Helms - APN 208 - 261 -41, 42, 43, S 44. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would abstain from vote on this i tem. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if Hampshire on the north side would be completed. Mr. Rougeau replied that it would be completed as a Condition of Approval. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if a condition could be added to landscape the whole parking area. Mr. Rougeau replied that the landscaping of the parking area of parcel 3 could be conditioned and also parcel 2; however, the remaining, property is not owned by the applicant. Mr. Rougeau stated the Resolution from the previous meeting had a Planning Commission Minutes -5- August 26, 1981 condition which stated that this Parcel Map would need to be recorded prior to issuance of building permits; however, it was Staff's opinion that the Parcel Map would not be needed until prior to occupancy. A new Resolution was presented to the Planning Commission to provide for this change. Chairman King opened the public hearing. No one spoke either for or against the project and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it was h-s opinion that since this lot was being split, the landscaping should be brought up to the standards which the City is now recommending_ Chairman King reopened the public hearing and asked Mr. Praver, the applicant, if he had any comments on this suggestion. Mr. Praver replied that the proposed owners of this project would not ?-e acquiring the parcel known as parcel 3 and did not feel it was his responsibility to landscape another person's parking area. Commissioner Tolstoy asked why the drive approach was not included in the landscaping requirements. Mr. Praver replied that the project was not allowed a second access on to Foothill and the applicant had agreed to upgrade the driveway as a condition of approval; however, he did not feel lie should be responsible for the landscaping. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he thought- that the person benefiting from the lot split should be required to do the improvements and land- scaping of the parking areas. Mr. Rougeau asked if this would be a condition on the Parcel Map. Commissioner Tolstoy replied It ct -xld. Chairman King asked for Staff's thoughi_s on this point. Mr. Vairin responded that who would pay for these fees would be depend- ent upon the final purchase price of the property. If the project is approved subject to the landscaping and improvements to parcel 3, it would be a decision between Mr. Praver and Mr. Hughes. Commissioner Rempel stated that it was his opinion that this type of condition was not fair to the applicant as he has no control over another owner's property. If the other property owner does not wish to have his property disturbed, the applicant would have no control over this condition. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it was not his intention that Mr. Praver pay for this improvement. He felt that the person who was applying for the correction to be made to the property line should be responsible Planning Commission Minutes -6- August 26, 1981 for the upgrading of the parking lot. Commissioner Dahl stated that even though he would like to see the parking lot upgraded he agreed with Commissioner Rempel that it would be placing an undue burden upon the applicant. Chairman King asked if there were fu -then comments as the public hearing was still open. There were no responses, and the public itearing was closed. Chairman King then called for the motion. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously to amend the Resolution of two weeks ago amending provision 5 in the Engineer- ing; Section to be amended to not require re�_ordation of the Parcel Map I•rior to occupancy. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Dahl, carried, to adopt the Resolu- tion approving Environmental Assessr.ent and Parcel Map 6502. rt F. REVISION TO CONDITIONS FOR SITE APPROVA7, NO. 80 -01 - HONE & ASSOCIATES - Chaffey Plaza located at the southwest corner of Lemon and Haven. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the Staff Report stating that two conditions on the Site Approval were being asked by Staff to be deleted. Engineering Condition 44 regarding the installa- tion of a traffic signal, and Condition 46 regarding the storm drain. Chairman King asked if the i.nlent was to delete the conditions or delay them. Mr. Rougeau replied that the storm drain and traffic signal would need to be install ... I at some later date but to place these conditions on this project when the installation of the storm drain and signal could be needed at a later date when their improvements were already completed was not a justified condit-ion. It was Staff's opinion that these conditions should be placed on a future project in that area. Chairman King asked who would be responsible to pay for these improve- ments if the conditions were deleted from this project. Mr. Rougeau replied that the project that generated the most traffic should be one who would be required to put up the funds for the improve- ments. Chairman King asked if it was Staff's opinion that the combination of projects now in that area would nct cause the traffic volumes to go over the edge. Planning Commission Minutes -7- August 26, 1981 Mr. Rougeau replied that parcel 2 or 3 would cause this to happen and both projects would have street improvement plans that are under process of approval and these improvements could be worked in as part of their street improvement. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Doug Hone, applicant, stated that a great deal of time and money had been placed on the study of this intersection. Be further stated that the applicants would be paying their System and Development fees to the City, as would the other projects, and he felt that this cash flow would take care of the funding problem of the signal.. The drainage problem had been mitigated satisfactorily between the efforts of City Staff and the project engineers and Mr. Hone felt that surrounding properties as well would benefit from these improvements to this project. Chairman King asked if there were any further public comments, there being none, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner. Rempel stated that-lie felt confident that the Systems and Development fees from the apartment project or any other project in that area would be sufficient to cover the installation of the traffic signal. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the reworking of Lemon Avenue was going to take care of the water runoff on that street. Mr. Rougeau replied that in the future a storm drain is planned to supplement the existing pipe to get the water into the ground. This project drains entirely onto Haven Avenue. Chairman King called for the motion. Notion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to adopt the Resolution approving the revision to Condition for Site Approval No. 80 -01. G. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11933 - WOODLAND PACIFIC - A public hearing to consider a requirement for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on a total planned residential development of 185 single- family detached units and 14.6 acre park on 95.5 acres of land in the R -1- 20,000 cone located on Hermosa Avenue, north of Hillside. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner reviewed the Staff Report. Chairman King asked Mr. Vairin if what was before the Commission at this meeting was the determination of whether or not the project in question needed an Environmental. Impact Report. Planning Commission Minutes -8- August 26, 1981 Mr. Vairin replied that this was Staff's intention. Commissioner Dahl asked if the density of the project had any bearing on the draft EIR. Mr. Vairin replied that the density was over the two dwelling unit per acre designation of the General Plan and would, therefore, require a General Plan amendment. However, is not: the sole reason for an EIR. Commissioner Dahl called attention to the fact that a Resolution had been adopted by the Planning Commission regarding lots in the R -1- 20,000 zone classification that the lot size would be 20,000 square feet net. Mr. Vairin stated that this would have to be resolved by the applicant in the EIR process. Mr. Vairin stated that the EIR would cover many aspects of the project, one of them being the land use category. Commissioner Dahl stated that the General Plan designated the west side of Hermosa as park. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Petcr Templeton of the Planning Center in Newport Beach, represented Mr. Dick Scott of Woodland Pacific. He stated that this project began approximately a year ago and at that time representatives of the Planning Center had met with City Staff to see what the requirements would be for this project and if an EIR would be necessary. Mr. Templeton stated that staff informed him that an EIR would not be required. Iie further stated that geologic, soil, and hydrology reports had been obtained by the Planning Center as well as the study into various types of fire retardant building materials. He said that the applicant would be willing to sell the property to the City as a park or to develop one quarter of the property and give three- quarters to the City as a park as well as many other alternatives. He stated that Mr. Scott would be placed under a financial burden if his project were postponed another five or six months while an EIR was being processed. Commissioner Dahl stated that the property i.0 question has been for sale since April and that this applicant may not necessarily be the person who would develop this property therefore lie felt that it could not be deemed a hardship that the Commission would be placing on the applicant to request an EIR. Mr. Templeton replied that this was placed in the newspaper approximately nine months after submittal and at that time Mr. Scott felt that he was getting nowhere with this project. Mr. Vairin stated that he would like to clear up three items which Mr. Templeton commented on. One comment being the length of time since Planning Commission Minutes -9- August 26, 1981 the project was filed. Mr. Vai.rin stated that the project was not officially filed until ipril of 1982._ She second issue is not whether or not the City would be losing a park but is that the area is General Planned for a park and the person who develops that land will have to deal with the issue of whether the City wishes the development of a park. The third issue was the density factor and this would be one of the points of the EIR. Ronnie Steven, who lives in the area adjacent to the project site, stated that she was in favor of an EIR because of the very serious drainage, circulation, and police and fire problems in the area. Christine Benoit, Alta Loma resident, asked if the project would be brought back to the Planning Commission for a public hearing after the completion of an EIR. Mr. Vairin replied that the EIR would be used to help mold and design the finished project or help the decision makers to decide whether the project should be approved. He explained that the EIR is a tool to determine the kinds of impacts as a result of this project the way it is proposed or alternatives to the project. Mr. Lam stated that the developer of this property would have serious drainage problems to consider as they were at the top of the Alta Loma Channel and this issue would be a consideration of the developer. Commissioner Sceranka asked for an explanation of what the Commission's responsibilities were when a project such as this was filed with the City. Mr. Lam replied that anyone is free to submit an application to the City with what ever proposal they have. Christine Benoit stated that she hoped that the Commission would keep in mind that the beauty of the area vas the reason for designating the area as park in the General Plan. Chairman King asked if there were further public comments, there being none, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he was very concerned about this particu- lar piece of property. lie stated that very few cities in the area are fortunate to have a forest and it was his intention as a Planning Commis- sioner to retain this piece of forest as the General Plan designation of park. He further stated that economic considerations of the applicant were not an issue that the Planning Commission should deal with. Com- missioner Sceranka stated `hat he was totally opposed to any mechanism other than an EIR for this project which would discuss the issues pre- sented by Staff. Planning Commission Minutes -10- August 26, 1981 Chairman. King stated that he felt that an EIR should not be required for the property. The type of development he felt was appropriate for the area would be of such extremely low density that it would not mitigate environmental impacts. He further stated that everyone was aware of the mitigating circumstances of the fault zones and drainage problems plus all of the other areas addressed in the reports attached to the Staff. Report and it was his opinion that if the property were planned properly at a very low density that there would be no impacts. He felt that the project as proposed would have many impacts but if it were planned properly it would not. Commi..ssi.oner Dahl stated that density would have a tremendous amount of i.mpacts and the decision at this meeting must be 'eased upon the ten- tative map as it was submitted to the City. He asked if the Commission could state that based upon the density shown, an EIR would be required; however, if the developer wished to come back with a lower density, the FIR would be reconsidered. Mr. Vairin replied that the decision is to be made on whether or not an EIR must be made on this tentative map as submitted. If this statement is made to the developer, they would have the option to drop this ten- tative and draw up a completely new project thus necessitating a new Initial Study to determine what potential impacts would be created from that project. Bob Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney, stated that the area of environ- mental. review has been an active area in the courts and some standards for judicial review have been developed to either require or not require EIR's. He further stated that the trend of the decisions have been to- wards the requirement of an EIR if there is any doubt on how the issue should be resolved. If the question of whether or not significant im- pacts are a result of the project is debatable, then the courts deem that an EIR should be prepared. The effect upon a developer in not re- quiring an EIR when one should be required could be zore severe than if • Negative Declaration was issued and a court- ordered an EIR prepared • year or so later. It could have a financial impact upon the City as the attorney fees are frequently awarded against the City where the decision was not to require an EIR and the City was sued over that decision. Commissioner. Sceranka asked if this area was designated as a park in the General Plan shouldn't the Commission be acting upon a negative impact on the General Plan amendment before action on the tentative map. Mr. Vairin replied that it would be done concurrently. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he could not understand Chairman King's statement that there are no negative impacts or an EIR required on a piece of property where a General Plan amendment would have to be made from a park designation to a proposal for a subdivision development. He felt that an EIR would most definitely be required when you were com- pletely changing the land use of a piece of property. Planning Commission Minutes -11- August 26, 1981 Mr. Vairin stated that the State Guidelines states that public contro- versy alone was grounds to require an EIR, despite the issue of density. Commissioner Sceranka stated that the proposal on this property is to take a public park and make it a private park. Commissioner Rempel stated that it is not a park, it is a proposed possible park. He further stated that he. was in agreement with Chairman King that the applicants come in with a proposal of a much lower density. He also stated that a study of the fire danger in that area should be looked into. Chairman King asked for a motion. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl, carried to require an Environmental Impact Report for Tentative Tract 11933. Chairman King voted No on this project for the reasons stated previously. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, DAHL, REMPEL, SCET IICA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: KING ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE OLD BUSINESS Commissioner Sceranka asked about the status of a Resolution or Ordin- ance he requested to have drawn up requiring all residents buying a home in the City to sign off on the General Plan Map. Mr. Lam replied that a priority list of work programs would be brought back to the Commission and they would be able to select which ones to act on first. NE[J BUSINESS Commissioner Rempel requested that Staff suggest an Ordinance to the City Council which would state that any time a house is remodeled or improved over a certain percentage, the Planning Commission could re- quire the dedications and improvements necessary to be made to the property. Commissioner Dahl asked Mr. Lam IS` he had reached a decision on having one or two Commi.ssionerr, present at the meeting with the homeowners concerned with the Marlborough tract. Mr. Lam replied that this time the homeowners expressed a desire to meet with Staff only. Mr. Lam stated that he. would report back to the Commission the items discussed at this meeting and try to arrange for the Commissioners to be in attendance at a later meeting with.the homeowners. Planning Commission Minutes -12- August 26, 1981 COUNCIL REFEPdLU u PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -03 - RLS ASSOCIATES - A planned devel- opment on 4.55 acres of land, consisting of 28 dwelling units in the A -1 zone (PD proposed), being divided by Tentative Tract No. 11610 into 28 eondominimn units (l lot) located on the west side_ of Turner Avenue jetween Church Street and Ease Line - APN ?08 -061- 03. Mr. Lam stated the Commissioner's packets contained the revised Site Plan for the RLS project. This Site Plan was referred back to the Planning Commission from the City Council after a joint effort on the revision between the Council and the homeowners of surrounding properties. t was being presented to the Planning Commission for their concurrence on three items; moving the swimming pool. north, more landscaping on the southern property line, and dropping the grade several feet. Mr. Lam further stated a motion would be needed on acceptance of the revised Site Plan. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Tolstoy, carried unanimously, to adopt the revised Site Plan for Planned Development 80 -03. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy, carried unamiously, to adjourn. 9 :40 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -13- August 26, 1981 l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting September 9, 1981 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Jeff King called the Regular City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission Meeting of September. 9, 1981, held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9151 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, to order at 7 p.m. He then led in the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL PRP,ENT: COMDII SSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Herman Rempel, Jeff Sceranka, Peter Tolstoy, Jeff King ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS., None STAFF PRESENT. Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Paul Rougcau, Senior Civil Engineer; Michael Vairin, Senior Planner. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Dahl, carried, to approve the April 22, 1981 Planning Commission Minutes. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, DAHL, KING NONE NONE SCERANKA, TOLSTOY - carried- Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to approve the May 27, 1981 Minutes, changing paragraph 14 on page 4 to read, "he would rather see units clustered together to allow more open space around the housing units ", and adding the reasons previously stated to Commissioner King's "no" vote and Commissioner. Tolstoy's abstention on page 8. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, REMPEL, SCERANKA, TOLSTOY, KING ,,Z- -S: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried- raised walkway, it is of concrete. Mr.. Vairin further stated that there is a condition for additional cross walk areas to connect the circulation pattern around the central core and private streets. Commissioner Tol-stoy stated that in reading the staff report he noticed that London Street has a drain that goes to Ramona. He asked if this would go underground. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil. Engineer, replied that it would. Commissioner Tolstoy asked for information on the improvements to Ramona that wi.l.l. go to flood control. Mr. Rougeau replied that there will be no proposed flood control improve- ments to Ramona but will go to an existing outlet on Ramona which is known to be operating quite well. Further, that a storm drain will not be a part of the project. Commissioner Tolstoy asked what will go on the southeast corner of the project to the street. Mr. Rougeau replied this project will route it directly onto the street. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the street's capacity is such that it will accept this water. Mr. Rougeau replied that it would. Mr. Vair.in stated that when the project to the northwest goes forward the development will aid in all.eviating the existing problem. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr.. Tom Utman of the Development Croup made a, presentation to the Com- mission explaining the type' of units and landscaping that will be pro- vided. IIe indicated that no driveways will open onto Ramona in an effort to ease traffic circulation. Ile also indicated that a. homeowners a.:socia- ti.on will maintain the green belts that will be provided. Commissioner. Dahl asked if Mr. Utman would provide him with price ranges of the units. Mr. Utman replied that they would be in the area of $80,000 - 120,000, and would range in size from 989 to 1,.M square feet. Mr. Lichtenberg, 9923 Monte vista, questioned the runoff water that occurs at the railroad tracks on Ramona and whether this development would further impede traffic under rainy conditions. Planning Commission Minutes -3- September 9, 1981 .1 Motion: Moved by Rompel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to approve the June 10, 1981 Minutes. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, SCEMW -, DAHL, TOI.STOY, KING NOES- COMIlIISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS7 NONE -carried - ANNOUNCEMENTS Miehael.Vairin, Senior Planner, announced that the September 10, 1981 Citv - County Planning Commissioners Association meeting, would be held at Di Censo's restaurant. Mr. Vairin advi.sed that the Etiwanda Specific Plan camnittee would meet at the Etiwanda Intermediate School on September 15, 1981, at 6:00 p.m. Mr. Vairin invited the Commission to attend the September 17 meeting of the Inland Empire American Planning Association meeting. Mr. Vairin advised that Mr.- Lain was meeting with a homeowners group this evening. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14ENT A' PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO- �s�-u± DEVELOPMENT GRGUP - A total planned development of. 10.1 acres into 81 1 t co ss- omprsing of 81 units arranged in duplexes, in the R zone generally located on the west side of Ramona, at Monte Vista - APN 202 - 181 -6, 6 and 16 (TT 11614). Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner Sceranka asked what type and grade of shingles would be used on this project. Mr. Vairin replied that the precise grade has not yet been determined the but will. be checked with the final building plan. shingle-3 would be an architectural style. Commissioner. Sceranka stated that a comment had been made regarding the pedestrian circulation system which was not shown on the design. Mr. Vairin replied Project and while i is not continuous loop not a as shown on Planning Commission Minutes -2- September 9, 1981 Mr. Rougeau replied that a vast improvement is expected because most of the water comes from the north ou 19th Street and the debris that causes this backup will be eliminated by the project. Mr. Vairin stated that to the northwest, a project is responsible for the construction of a major storm drain in Archibald which also takes water off of Ramona. Mr. Lichtenberg stated that another of his concerns is that these projects are so far from being constructed that an improvement will. not occur for a long time. Mrs. Jackie Dellonte, 6975 Ramona, stated that she had appeared previously and again expressed concern about flooding, traffic, and the number of children that might- impact schools. She also indicated that the neighbor- hood was very quiet at the present time and she would not like to see that changed. Mr.. Harley Lovitt, owner of the property to be developed, stated that apparently local. residents were unaware of the major storm drain improve- ments that were to occur. Further, with the underground flood system will be channeled into the adjacent system ai-d will be an improvement over the present situation. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Tolstoy asked how the water that comes off the street into the existing system gets under the railroad tacks. Mr. Rougeau replied that it is through concrete box culverts on both sides. Commission-!r Tolstoy asked if he was right in saying that the water does not enter tl,e street but enters the structL^e. Mr. Rougeau replied that the water still goes on the street a little way because of the property to the south which will not be improved until it develops. Commissioner. Tolstoy asked what will. happen. Mr. Rougeau replied that it will require a public project to widen the railroad crossing. Commissioner Dahl asked at what point. this would take place. Mr. Rougeau stated that this would be a couple of projects down the line. lie indicated that the busier crossings are the ones that have priori.cv and indicated that those such as Crave and Vineyard nt the Santa Fe railroad wculd be very expensive. Mr. Rougeau stated that Plarining Commission Minutes -4- September. 9, 1981 there is score money the railroads and PUC to widen these crossings but it is done on a priority basis. Mr. Hopson, City Attorney, stated that a lot of time city's can do this with FAU funds and until those funds free up again that source of revenue is cut off. Commissioner Rempel stated that he felt that it should be daid again that these developments will el-Lminate a lot of debris that is presently coming into the street. He then explained how streets had formerly been used as flood control channels. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the debris on Ramona is the cause of the water going into the street. Further, that when the debris is removed it will help the street flooding problem. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that Le likes this project a_a the year that it took to redesign it was well worth it. He felt that the developer did a good job on the transition on Ramon:.. Commissioner Tolstoy asked that: a directory be placed in the premises so that visitors would be able to locate the project's tenants. Commissioner Dahl stated that he did not agree with the directory. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he did not have a problem with actling this. Mr. Vairin stated that this could physically be accomplished and could Le added as a condition. Chairman King stated that he die not personally taink this should be a standard condition. although he did not have strong reservations. Commissioner Sceranka •asked about the illumination or, this building. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he personally felt that numbering, illumin- ation and directories are needed on projects of this type. Commissioner Sceranka stated his concerns with excessive energy use in the illumination. Commissioner Tolstoy replied that such illumination would require only 7 watts. Commissioner Rempel stated that regular single family homes have mail boxes and these homes do not have. If they were individual homes, they would have a box with a number. Chairman King again opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -5- September 3, 1981 Mr. Utman addressed the Commission and stated that the requirement for illumination did not bother him but that a public mail box or directory does. He indicated that they are on the border line of single family homes and that individual mail bores will be provided in the complex. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Dahl complimented the developer on the design of this project, stating that it looks 14-ke single family homes. He indicated that the street widening has made a difference in the impaction on the street. He indicated that the Commission is familiar with Carnelian and "now it be -- carne a better street in the rain after it was widened. He assured the lady who spoke regarding children and traffic that it is a fairly low density project and will not further impact traffic. He indicated that the developer must obtain letters of certification from the school district befor° he can proceed with development. Commissioner Sceranka stated thLt the biggest concern of the Planning Commission is for tie residents adjacent and that recreation is provided for children living within the project. This, he said, is so that child- ren will not have to run into the street to play. He indicated that the project contains sufficient recreation area to allow children the play space that they need. Motion: Moved by Tolstov, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -98, approving Tentative Tract No. 11614 and issuing a negative declaration subject to the conditions as shown in the staff report. Commissioner Tol.stoy also requested that the requirement for a directory be worked out between the Design Review Committee and the developer and, if it is felt to be necessary, install it in this project. He also asked that this be a consideration in future projects of this type. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -99, recommending approval of the Planned Community designation. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE O NGE NO. 81 -03 - DAON CORPORATION - A proposed change of zone from M -2 (General. Manufacturing) to C -2 (General Busio,�ss Commercial.) on 18 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow and haven - APN 208 - 622 -01. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 7007 - DAON CORPORATION - A division of 9.649 acres into 3 parcels within the DI -2 zone, located or. the southeast corner of Haven Avenue. and Civic Censer Drive - APN 208 -35 -03 & 11. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin reviewed the staff report. Planning Commission Minutes -6- September 9, 1981 Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. .Jack Corrigan, representing the applicant, stated he had nothing to add but would answer any questions. There being no comments, the public hearing was closeu. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -100, recommending the zone change. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -101, approving the parcel. map. 7:45 p.m. The Planning Commission. recessed. 8:00 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. D. EN'VIRON?IENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 7061 - KACOR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - An industrial su:: -iivision of 78 acres div+.ded into 45 lots (4 phases) in the M -2 zone, located on the southeast corner of 5th Street and Cleveland Avenue - APN 210 - 082 -02 through 9, and 10. Commissioner Sceranka ste -,ped down due to a possible Conflict of Interest_ Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. He indicated that storm drain and street improvements will be required and included in the up-oming assesment district. He indicated that phase 4. improvements will not be required at this time but will be included in future subdivision. Chairman King opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel asked what will happen to the little triangular piece of land if the road is designed as shown on the map. Mr. Rougeau replied that contained within the Agenda packet is a more detailed portion of the parcel map showing, this and th.:t an agreement had been worked out between the adjacent land owner au� the developer for its acquisition. Commissioner Rempel stated if an agreement is being worked out for this land, he has no objection. Commissioner Dab]. asked if the adjacent property owner is present and is in agreement with the statements that had been made. Planning Commission Minutes -7- September 9, 1961 The adjacent property owner - Lied that he had entered into an agreement with Kacor, who, he said, wil. •rchase this piece of property within a 90 -day period. Commissioner Dahl asked that for sake of remaining strong on this, can the tentative map be approves the basis that this agreement will be fullfilled. He indicated that somethi.no happens and the agreement falls through this piece of land could remain and cause future problems. Mr. Vairin stated that if this is a concern of the Commission, it would be appropriate to add a condition to the tentative tract map that this come back to the Commission for realignment if this agreement cannot be worked out. Mr. Hopson stated that he had no problem with such a condition. Motion: Moved by Rempel., seconded by Dahl, carried, that Resolution No. 81 -102 be adopted and that a condition be added to the tentative tract map that the agreement for the triangular piece of land be consumated within 90 days. Commissioner Tolstoy commented that he felt that the developer did a nice job oa the conceptual site plan in which he showed that the site could be developed in an orderly manner. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6976 - CAPELLINO - An industrial subdivision of 49.93 acres into 22 parcels in the M -2 zone located on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Haven Avenue - APN 209 - 141 -68. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Mr. Vairin added comments regarding the conceptual site plan and the lot size and configurations. He indicated that as specified in the new Industrial Specific Plan, they were required to go to a minimum of 2- acre lots. He indicated that staff also required a conceptual site plan to show how these lots would be developed. He indicated that some of the concepts shown, although they work or. an individual lot basis, do nL. meet some of the previous Commission policies concerning Arrow Route access. He indicated that it does show that these can work together although the conceptual site plan that is shown is not one that staff would be recommending for appro -al or is proposing. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he did not think that they used much thought in doin'• this subdivision. Mr. Rougeau state that this is a conceptual plan and the developer needed to know what will happen. He added that on the access onto Planning Commission Minutes -8- September 9, 1981 Arrow Route, there are condition: that will be required in order that this will be in compliance with the access policies. He indicated that if the Commission foresees future problems with the site plan, they should make their concerns known to the applicant. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the Industrial Specific Plan ensurers that there will be quality development in that area and the requirement that the applicant do a con:eptual plan not only alerts the person who is developing this land but will show the Commission that they understand the constraints of that plan. He indicated that after looking at this plan in comparison to the last plan whic'a came before the Commission, it shows little thought_ Commissioner Sceranka stated that for the sake of discussion, he. would like to bring dp the driveway situation onto Arrow Route_. He spoke of the common accesses of some of the lots and stated that he wished the applicant to understand this. He further stated that one of the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan is that those industrial projects that are rail- served use it for that purpose. He did not see the need to build four buildings on a pad on a site only being served by rail and that he would have a hard time in accepting those buildings that might be adjacent for non -rail uses. He felt that those lots should be re- served for rail users. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Wally A. Pollock, 1880 Del Amo Boulevard, Torrance, California, the developer /architect, spoke to the questions raised by Commissioner Sceranka relative to rail use, stating that he was not sure if they will be putting up one building or 4 lots. He indicated that he had been asked to make up some type of drawing and this is what he had done. He stated that he had exceeded the landscaping requirements and also the parking requirements. lie indicated that a color rendering will be provided in the future. He agreed to the policy that there would only be two driveways onto Arrow and concurred with everything else that staff has recommended. lie indicated that Condition 41 of the engineer's report requires a letter from the Water District, which, he said, he already had and :.d that this condition be waived. The Commission responded that this was a standard condition and if he already had the letter there is no problem. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, adopt Resoluti_^n No. 81 -103, Parcel Map No. 6976. seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to issuing a negative declaration and approving Planning Commission Minutes -9- September 9, 1981 Commissioner Sceranka stated that he wished the applicant to know that he understood that a lot of work had gone into this plan. NEW BUSINESS F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -31 - REITER - The development of 3 concrete tiltup industrial buildings totaling 31,368 square feet in the Cucamonga Business Park on 2 acres of land in the M -1 zone located on the west side of Archibald, south of Arrow - APN 209 - 121 -37 and 38. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he had been under the impression that Archibald was to be left open for another type of development.. Mr. Vairin replied that Mr. Reiter wanted to get a. restaurant to locate there, but had been unable to do so. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that there had been quite a lot of previous discussion on this. Commissioner Sceranka stated that during the Design Review meetings when they first looked at Building No. 16 they found that it was turned to face Business Center Drive. He stated that they recommended that it be turned, and it was, with the landscaping also facing onto Archibald. Commissioner Tolstoy commented that the Design Review Committer, had done a good job. Chairman King opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -104, approving Development Review No. 81 -31 and issuing a negative declaration. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to ad. j ourn . 8:25 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned. Planning Commission 14inut3s -10- September 9, 1981 Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -11- September 9, 1981 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular. Meeting September 23, 1981 CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting cf the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, held at the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, was called to order by Chairman Jeffrey King at 7:00 p.m. Chairman King then led in the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Herman Rempel, Jeff Sceranka Peter Tolstoy, and Jeffrey King ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None STAFF PRESENT: Ted Hopson, City Attorney; Jack Lan, Director. of Coimnanity Development; Michael Vairin, Senior Planner; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; and Janice Reynolds, Secretary ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr.. Lam announced that the Citizens Advisory Commission would be meeting Thursday, September 24, and the public was invited to attend. This meeting was scheduled to begin. at 7:00 p.m. CONSENT CALENDAR A. TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 80 -29 - BRYANT - The construction of a 10,000 square foot industrial building on 1.19 acres of land within the M -2 zone., located at 9595 Lucas Ranch Road - APN 210 - 071- -42. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Rempel, carried unanimously to approve the time extension for Director Review No. 80 -29. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6937 - PL•REZ - A resi- dential subdivision of 2.41 acres into 4 parcels within the R -1 zone located on the southwest corner of Victoria and East Avenue - APN 227 - 121 -41. Mr. 'Lain reviewed the Staff Report. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mike Perez addressed the Commission stating that his preference in the lots facing north and south was based upon access to the sun as he is proposing to utilize solar energy, and East Street would someday be a main street. He felt that driveway access on Victoria would be a safer access. As there was no further public comment, Chairman King closed the public hearing. Commissioner Rempel stated that it was his opinion that the configuration now before the Commission was very adequate and felt that placing one or two drive approaches on East Avenue was riot the most sensible alter- native. Commissioner. Sceranka stated that he would prefer to see lots 2 and 3 facing; East Avenue as front yard setbacks in the homes facing major streets in Etiwanda was one of the concerns of the citizens attending the Etiwanda Specific Plan meetings. He felt that turning lots 2 and 3 to face East Avenue would .1.mprove the character of that street. He further stated that the driveways could be combined to minimize the traffic on East Avenue. Commissioner Rempel stated that he felt the -o mnissior. should take into consideration that this configuration was whit the applicant wanted and for the Commission to state that their way was the only way was wrong. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he agreed with both Commissioners Rempel and Sceranka in that he agreed with Commissioner Sceranka that the Etiwanda Specific Plan should be considered In this project, but also agreed with Commissioner Rempel that the wishp.; of the applicant should be considered. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Rempel, seconded by Tolstoy, carried, to adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 6937. Commissioner Dahl stated that his reason for voting yes on this project was because he felt that by turning lot 2 and 3 would place too many entrances and exits on East Avenue. Commissioner the Etiwanda came before his c:ecisi.on property. Tolstoy stated that his reason for voting yes was because Specific Plan had not yet been formalized and as this project the Commission before the Plan was formalized, he felt that should be based on what the applicant wanted to do with his Planning Commission Minutes -2- September 23, 1981 Commissioner. Sceranka stated his reason for voting no on the project was based upon his information received for turuing lots 2 and 3 to face East Avenue. C. ENVIRONMENTAL &3SESSMENT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 140. 10210 - L1WLOR - A custom lot subdivision of 46 acres into 38 lots comprising 36 units in the R -1- 20,000 zone and R -1 -14 acre zone generally located on the north side of Almond between Sapphire and Turquoise - APN 200- 061 -12, 200 - 051 -06, and 1061- 172 -03. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE N0. 81 -01 - LAWLOR - A requ-st to change the zone from R -1 -14 to P, -1- 20.,000 to be consis- tent with the zoning to the west. This area is a portion of Tenta- tive Tract No. 10210. The balance of the tract is zoned for the intended use. Chairman Kin; removed himself. as Chairman on this item due to a conflict of interest and Commissioner Rempel., as Vice• - chairman, filled that pos Lion. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the Staff report stating that Staff was suggesting two further conditions be added to the Conditions of Approval. One was to add the condition thaL C.C. Ix R.'s and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowner's Association be approved by the City Attorney and recorded with the map. The other condition Staff was recommending was that the applicant work with the utility companies who owned several of the easements and corrieors along the southeast corner of the property to provide these areas as usable open spaces to the residents of the project such as equestrian staging areas or play areas. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Leon Kedding of C.M. Engineering Associates, represented the applicant, Gregory Lawlor. He provided an explanation of the changes that were made to the Map, based on previous Commission direction. Iie proposed that lots 32 and 33 be readjusted so that the west property line of lot 33 be coterminus with the east line of the forest easement. Mr. Kedding stated that it was his unaerstandim; that the fifty-foot clearance of flammable material was to be ar.c,:nd the perimeter of the project boundary, not around each unit as stipulated in the Resolution under Planning Division Condition No. 5. He further stated that Standard Condition J -1 indicating that full street improv,:ments including, drive approaches should be amended as this was a custom lot subdivision dnd he proposed putting in the curb and as each logy was sold and the owner pulled his building permits he could obtain an encroachment permit to cut the curb. Condition L -1 and 6 pertaining to Aani.tary sewers were also of concern to Mr. Kedding, and he indicated that sewers were not proposed for this project. Mr. Kedding indicated that he had no objection to Planning Commission ]`Minutes -3- September 23, 1981 Staff's recommendation to the use of the easements of the utility companies as an eyuebtrian and play area; however, he questioned having that statement aided as a condition as it was not known what the utility companies would rr_qui.re at this time. Commissioner Sceranka asked what Staff's intent was with this condition. Mr. Vairin replied that the inten, was that the developer make an attempt to coordinate with the utility companies to come up with a planned con- cept for the area. Mr. Kedding, Mated that he had no objection to working with Staff and the utility companies in the coordination of this planned concept. Commissioner Dahl stated that the natural vegetation in that area was highly flammable vegetation and that was a concern of his in leaving the natural vegetation. Mr. Kedding replied that they would be clearing the perimeter of the property as conditioned of all flamnable vegetation. Ted Hopson, City Attorney, asked who would be owning lots 32 and 36 and having fee title to lot 35. Mr. Kedding replied that lots 32, 35 and 36 would be owned by the Howe- owner's Association. Mr.. Hopson stated that definition and controls woui.d have to be added to the C.C. & R.'s. Mr. Kedding replied that the condition was being added by Staff. Commissioner Sceranka asked what was the anticipated use of the open space. Mr.. Kedding replied that it was anticipated as an equestc�an easement. Mr. Hopson stated that in the C.C. & R.'s a statement should be included that there cannot be improvements constructed on lots 34 and 36. Chairman Rempel asked if there were any people wino wished to speak in favor or Opposition to the project. K'r. Chuck Morgan, owner of .Tand adjacent to the east of the project, addressed the Commission. H� stated his opposition to the project based on the density. He further stated that it was his opinion that this area is conducive to 2 acre zoning, not one -half acre. He further stated that he objected due to the increased amount of vehicular traffic at the intersection of Almond and Sapphire that would be brought about by one -half acre zoning. Planning Commission Minutes -4- September 23, 1981 Mr. Arthur Bridge, 8715 Banyan, stated that he was also a property owner in the area of the project. He further stater] that the City now has a great abundance of 20,000 square foot lets. He indicated to the Com- mission that he has future plans to subdivide the property that he now owns into 3 acre and 2 acre lots. Mr. Bridge restated his opinion that the property be zoned into larger lots such as two acre lots. Commissioner Sceranka stated tha: to his knowledge none of the lots in the proposed development were one -half acre. The minimum lot was 30,000 square feet with the majority of the lots 35,000 square feet and over with some lots 40,000 and 50,000 square feet. He stated his problem was In the number of square feet needed to make a significant difference between one -half acre and acre lots. He asked if a Deer Creek type development with its one acre lots were placed in this area including meandering streets, if this would still be considered a detriment to the community. Mr. Bridge stated that he concurred with Commissioner Sceranka in that the design was a. fairly good one and that he was glad to see that most of the lots were over the 20,000 square foot size. However, he still. preferred to see larger than 50,000 square foot lots. Mr.. Kedding addressed the objections that were raised during these comments. He stated that Almond would be paved eastward as required by Staff. He further stated the reason for requesting the rezoning of the eastern section of the property was merely to make the zoning consistent with the remainder of the property. He indicated that the lots in this area would be averaging one acre in size. There were no further public comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Tolstoy asked Mr.. Rougeau where the water was generated and where it goes. Mr. Rougeau stated that the water 3enerated from the site presently goes across Almond in a few places then goes into the Almond Intercept and eventually into Cucamonga Creek. He indicated that three streets being put in by this project would be the ma3--r means of handling, the water runoff. Additionally, a storm drain would be installed that would intercept the water that was on the streets. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if th water would go under or over Almond. Mr. ? tougeau replied that it would go under Almond. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Rougeau if there would be a catch basin north of this area or if it would run straight into the channel. Planning Commission Minutes -5- September 23, 1981 Mr. Rougeau replied that there would have to be some storm drains in the streets. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that one of Mr.. Morgan's concerns in his letter to the Commission was water on Almond Street. He asked if this project would or would not add to Almond Street. Mr. Rougeau replied that it would not: add to Almond, but would decrease the amount of runoff. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the conditions of approval stated that an A.C. berm would be required on the south side of Almond. Mr. Rougeau replied that it was not stated in the conditions of approval, but was usually left to design and it was usually left to see what it would do to the access to the southerly portion and if it was necessary for drainage protection. Mr. Rougeau stated that an A.C. berm could be required it found necessary to protect property from the runoff. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he felt that it should be added as a condition c: approval. he further stated that the residents of this City should have the option to live on different size lots. He felt that areas with a hilly terrain were good places to have these larger lot sizes. He cited faults, fire hazards, fire response _ime, and the topography of the area as reasons why this project lended itself well to larger let sizes. Commissioner Dahl stated that he liked the idea of the increases in lot size as they went up the hill; however, he felt they should increase further. He also stated that because of the open space, it made the lots appear larger than they actually were. He felt that ingress and egress easements should be provided in the deeds for moving animals on and off the property. Additionally, he felt that it should be a con- dition that a deeded access be provided to the property at the northeast section of the subdivision. Mr. Vai.rin stated that the problem with this condition was that the tract boundaries only went up to the northerly project line and did not include the area Commissioner Dahl expressed concern about. He suggested that the applicant should be asked if he would consent to this condition. Mr. Kedding replied that a letter had been received from the forest service stating that alternate access must be provided and that lie h:d no objection to a condition being added to stipulate that temporary access connecting the forest service road to the public trails be main- tained all the way to the east property line. Planning Commission Minutes -6- September 23, 1981 Motion: Moved by Commissioner Sceranka to adopt the Resolution approving Tentative Tract No. 1G210 with the changes to lots 32 and 33 as proposed by the applicant, the deletion of words in the Engineering Conditions pertaining to sanitary sewers, and drive approaches as desired by the applicant, the access for both equestrian and open space be included as a condition of approval, the open. space plan to be coordinated by he developer, utility companies, and City St-af.f and be approved by the Design Review Committee, that the 50' corridor required by the Foothili Fire Denartment be planted, that the C.C. & R.'s include a requirement that ingress and egress be provided to each lot, where possible., to provide access to the open space areas and for the removal of animals, that access be brought over to the property line at the northeast corner of the tract, and an A.C. berm be provided on Almond, if necessary. This Motion was seconded by Commissioner Dahl, carried. Commissioner Tolstoy voted No on this project as his opinion was that the topography of this area made it sensitive enough to require the developer to divide in.to larger lots. Commissioner Sceranka asked if the intent on the Zone Change for this project was merely to make it consistent with the rest of the property and that by approving the Zone Change it was not a statement that the Commission desired zoning of one -half acre lots and not larger sizes. Mr.. Vair.in replied that is a minimum one -half acre zoning. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried, to adopt the Resolution approving Zone Change No. 81 -01. 8:25 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 8:40 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -04 (TT 11935) - ELITE DEVELOPMENT - A planned development of 132 condominium units on 0.05 acres of land in the R -3 zone, located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue, south of Foothill - APN 208 - 241 -11. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. He indicated that it wa:: Staff's desire to further condition this project to include the dense landscaping of the first 200' along Vineyard Avenue north and south of the project to help buffer the back side of the project along the carport area. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -7- September 23, 1981 Chuck Henderson of Elite Development addressed the Commission and gave a background description of his company. He stated that be would answer any questions the Commissioners or public had. There were nc questions or public comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel stated that the Design Rev'_ew Committee had reviewed the plans for this project and it was his opinion that this was a unique and good plan. lie further stated that he hoped this project would be soon completed so that: the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga could see what a good cordominium protect looked like. Commissioner Sceranka stated that his opinion was that the project provided the diversified type of housing needed in the community. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that ..e liked the footprints o� the project as they were not monotonous like some of the projects that had been before the Commission. Re expressed his concern in the parking being so close to the street. However, felt that witli proper landscaping and mounding the parking could be adequately buffered. Commissioner Dahl stated that he enjoyed the lcoks of the project and his only concern was with the closeness of the access to the property to the intersection of Foothill and Vineyard. However, he had been assured by Staff that there would be no problems with the access. Motion: Moved by commissioner. Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt the Resolution approving Tentative Tract 11935 with the added condition of additional dense landscaping along the first 200' north and south of the project on Vineyard Avenue. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Sceranka, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously to adopt the Resolution approvin>; Planned Development No. 81 -01. and the request for the change of zone. F. ENVTROt7MENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -06 - (TT 11144) - T &M BUILDERS - A total planned development of 62 te-,anhouse units on 5.+ acres of land in the A -1 zone, located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, north of Arrow Route - APN 208 - 311 -2; & 26. Michael. Vairin, Senior '_Tanner, reviewed the Staff Report. He indicated to the Commission that it was Staff's recommendation to further condition the project to include setting back the first two buildings on either side of the entrance an additional 10`. Chairman King opened the public_ he aring. Mr.. Terry Christianson, representing T &M Builders, addressed the Com- mission stating that he would answer any questions the Commission had. Planning Commission Minutes -8- September 23, 1931 T here were no questions and no further public co°mients and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Sceranka stated that the project was a product rf success- ful Design Review meetings and thought the architectural deriga of the buildings would enhance the community. Motion: Moved by Rempel, sec..aded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt the Resolution approving Planned Development 81 -06 and the re- quested change in zone. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt the Resolution approving Tentative Tract 13.144 with the additional condition of moving the first two buildings on either side of the entrance back an additional 10'. * t * * t NEW BUSINESS C. RECOMMENDji?ION TO CITY COUNCIL OF PROJECT FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF ELECTRIC LINES - Selection of initial project rmd recommendation of a priority list for future projects. Mr. Rougeau introduced Richard Gota, Associate Civil Engineer of r Engineer-:ng Staff, who presented the Staff Report. Commissioner Tolstoy asked who would be required to pay for putting powea to `lle homes along these project boundaries. Mr. Co ?a s-, ;lied that the responsibility would be that of the property owner. Commissioner Rempel stated that this was one of the things that City Council would have to look at to help property owners defray the cost of this project. Commissioner Tolstoy *stated that he felt that Grow. Avenue should be taken off the list until a later date and that some consideration should be given to Haven Avenue iu front or the new City Hall. Commissioner Dahl stated that along the stretch.of Archibald being pro -+osed there were approximately 40 older homes in that area possibly owned by the elderly and this was another reason why funding of some type should be a consideration. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed with this recommendation and thought teat possibly a low interest loan may be made available. Planning Commission Hinutea -9- September 23, 1981 Chairman King stated that he felt that Haven should be placed at the top of the priority list and that areas where the burden of the cost cf this project would nrt fall cn too many property owners should be considered. He further stated that it was :iis opinion that the process was not worth expending more City funds in terns of beautification funds. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously to adopt the Resolution approving the priority list of potential projects for underground electric Dines with the following charges: Item 1 to be Archibald Avenue - from Foothill to Church; Item 3 to be Haven Avenue from Foothill to Arrow and the deletion of Item 7, Grove Avenue. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Ds;h1, carried, to recommend to City Council that a method be found to assist homeowners in the project area to defray or assist in the financing of the cost of house hook -up either by the utility company or by the City, and that Staff research the various methods and recommend them to the Council. Chairman King voted no on this recommendation as it was his opinion that the City should not be required to subsidize things of this nature for the private citizens. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he would like to go on record as saving he would like to recommend to the Design Review Committee that he would not like to see any more monotonous projects. ADJOURNMENT 'lotion: Moved by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Scersnka, carried unanimously to adjourn. 9:30 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, Secretary Planri.ng Commission Minutes -10- September 23, 1981 Ll El ij CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 2E, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM- Jacic Lam, AICP, Director of Community De-elopment BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REOUESTS FOR TIME EXTENSIONS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT I ,IlJVJ,�fV�J,JVIJy BACKGROUND: The attached letters from the applicants request extensions for the above - described projects. Generally, the requests are based upon the prevailing high interest rates. Listed below are the expiration dates for each project. The approved Tentative Tract maps are shown on the at- tached Exhibits B -G, respectively. Only Tentative Tract 11013 has submitted plans for plan check_ Tract Expiration Date 9659 12 -22 -81 11459 12 -22 -81 11563 12- 10 -81 11013 12 -10 -81 9619 12 -10.81 11564 11 -26 -81 Tentative Tract ;-lap approvals are valid up to a. maximum of 42 months, with appropriate extensions per the Subdivision Ordinance regulations. There- fore, the Planning Commission could grant a maximum time extension of 30 months for all of the above - described projE °ts. However, past Planning Commission policy has b2 -n to grant extensions for 18 months. Approval of a time extension for a tentative subdivision map .squires a motion to adopt the attached resolution. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that an 18 month extension be granted for the tracts listed above to run from the present expiration dates to the dates listed in the attached resolution. ITEM A Time Extension Requests Staff Report Respectfully submitted, clu Lt, JACK LAM, AICP, Director of Community Development JL:DC :cd IFAI Attachments: Letters from applicants Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibits B - 6 - Tentative Tract Maps Resolution .,,cober 28, 1981 L.-A E E C C. OrDUGLAS GORGEN Attorney at Law 7333 Helimaa Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 (714) 987 -632 City of Rancho Cucamonga Com ni.ty Development Department Planning Division Post Office Box 897 :'(ancho Cucanonga, Calif. 91701 Re: Tentative Tract No. 9659 Time Extension Request Dear Sirs: October 1, 1981 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. SEP 30 '981 AM PM 718,9;1Iu112I1l213t415i6 I We hereby request an extension of time to record Tentative Tract No. 9659. This tentative track naa was approved on December 22, 1981, and was initially qranted one year to be recorded. We are requesting an eighteen month extension be granted for the recordation of this map. I believe that the new subdivision ordinance allows for the granting of the eighteen month period of time. our reason for requesting the extension of time is based on the financing market that has existed for the past year. It has been vir- tually impossible to proceed with the project during the past year dime to the lack of financing and high interest rates. We have prepared th., final engineering for the tract and are nerdy to proceed with the pro- ject as soon as the financial market improves. Enclosed is our check for $62.00 representing the extension request fee. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. Yours truly, C. Douglas Gbrgen, Prtner Carnelian 7xivestmerit� c/ v CDG:vr Encl. PRIME, BUILDERS 5873 C &rdoza Dr. Westlake, California 91361 October 5. L981 Mr. 'Dan Coleman Assistant Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. Subject: Tentative Tract Map No. 11459 Dear Mc•. Coleman: This letter is our formal. request fora time extension of our ten - tativz tract maF t40. 11459. We need the additional our engineering and our working drawings. time to complete After receiving your work initial approval, we were forced to stop al.1 deliveer r clear title the project until one of the sellers of the propety could . rTLiis requirement has been met and we are under full production of our improvera:ent glans and final tract map. We greatly appreciate your cons;.deration of this matter. Your $62 extension fee is enclosed. Enclosure RSJ /sf j CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COrPMUNITY OEVVOKIENT DEPT. Ash PH ': i8�9d0�llii2 {2�2�8�4�516 S,3(rt Ronald S. Ju /rgenlsen Executive Vice- Pres1dernt lie'_J J red hill pap mars inc.' (7o, 4) east N street, ontario, califor is 91764 E September 24, 1981 Mr. Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California Subject: Tentative Tract No. 11563 Certified No. P26 6710849 Dear Mr. Coleman: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVEI OPMENT DEPT. S C V 2 8 1981 ANA PM �' 1819110111112111213141516 Your letter dated September 21, 1981, indicated- that the subject project will not be ready to record on or before the expiration date of December 10, 1981. I agree with your observation and request a 12 month extension for recording. 1 am enclosing a check in an amount of $62.00 prepared I.o the order of Community Development Department. Landmark Consulting Engineers are preparing the documents for this project, and they have informed me that final documents shall be ready to record in approximately 30 days. They also indicated that their office has been working with Curt Joh.ison, Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, regarding street names; Jim Kline, Cucamonga County Water District, regarding water lines and Fire hydrants and Paul Rougeau, Engineering Department, City of Rancho Cucamonga, regarding street improvement plans. The primary reason for our extension request is that an unusual amount of time has been required to satisify adjacent neighbors regarding street pattern and access as well as meeting City departmental requirement3. Sincerely, E. Causey, At JEC.dt / cc: Terry Lane, Landmark Consulting Engineers File (3) 13.11 C. H. Brubaker 3128 Virginia Ave. West Covina, Calif. 91791 I' Y GF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1,4 -MMITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. Stv 30 1981 PM ��g I�1Q111 EL.11E2e3o4�5 (6 October 1, 1981 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attn: Mr. Jack Lam Subject: Tentative Tract #11013 - Extension (request- 18 months Dear Mr. Lam: Due to the prevailing economic conditions, we respectively request an extension on my above mentioned tract. Inclosed please find my c1leck for $62.00. If there is any additirn-ial charges in preparing any paper work, please notify me. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Yours truly, , C. H. Brubaker «r. enc. 11 ( HILLSIDE TNVESIIMIMS 7333 Hellman Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Clir" pF jflCJM COMMUNITY OE' -0C f AAj0pTA F! VEt Af 2 1981 7r8,91ID111,12,1r2l ;3 G 4. 4 Septeaer 30, 1981 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Developnnnt Department Planning Division P.Q. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91701 Re: Tentative Tract- 9619 is Time Extension Request Dear Sirs: We hereby request an extension of time be granted to reco*_3 Tentative Tract No. 9619. This tentative tract map -vas approved December 15, 1980, and was initially granted one year to be recorded. We are requesting an eighteen month extension be granted for the recordation of this map. our reason for requesting the extension of tine is based on the poor financing market and high interest rates that have existed for the past year. We have completed the final engineering and are prepared to proceed as soon as the econcm7 permits. Enclosed is our check for $62.00 representing the extension request fee. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. Yours v Douglas K. Hone DMi /vr enc. �;ac i r MARTIN H. BLANK, JR. ATTORNEY AT LAW WILSWIRL k'OULLIeRV. U4^ rLOOR LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90024 1213141G•0&" • (2Q1 670-2D77 September 29, 1981 Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga r.. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 At`01;:i.on: Mr. Jack Lamb, Planning Di -rector Re: Tract No. 11564 Genclemen: Cr,tMAU'NiTY DULLOPMEAI TD PT. k� 11g,111,,21142131415 516 1 The undersigned represents and is an offic(r of the Almar. Corporation, the owner of the real property descri '-ed on the Tentative Track Map No. 11564. It is my understanding that my client has until November 26, 1981 to satisfy the conditions established by the City Of Rancho Cucamonga to file a final Map for that Tract. As I am sure you are aware, the market conditions for obtaininc reasonably priced construction financing, as well as permanent financing, for a condominium project contemplated on this Tract, is virtually impossible to obtain at this time. In addition, because of the inabil- ity to obtain reasonable i.nstitu+-i.enal_ financing for condominiums of the type contemplated "3r. the Tract, the number of potential buyers who could afford to purchase the condominium units described on the Map is compara- tively small, as evidenced by the surplLS of available housing that exists at this time in Riverside County. Because of these masons, I am hereby requesting on behalf of Almar Corporation ai 18 -month extension of time to satisfy the conditions contained in Resolution No. 80 -65, relating to the Tentative Tract Map No. 11564, for a period. of 18 months to May 26, 1983. My client hopes and anticipates '-hat the real estate lending environment will have changed sufficiently by that time to permit the commencement of construction of the project and the satis- faction of the conditions set forth in the above- referred- to Resolution. 13 15:,1 Ell 4 1 a + NN•.wn. T te �w .�..e+..a'.r..N..o. . nN N..ee+N.+� IIO /OAIO'J •WMI; OYJ. Et] e a.o.e...... . qmg •q rrewyy rargmrro7 oVnupNr'I7VIA W"UnNVaR:� :r i ` W • W tL ur; W. I F F �w z o_ Ju i• '1 'y OB - 7i" 0i 5G 4 ti x o a 0 a tT o � a Ir (y c : o- ¢ me i o �d h > Z a ~ Y U h = � r � r. IL v 7 b i U N +k 1 y ?i 4 r T '4f RESOLUTION NO. 1 RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING 0MMISSION, APPROVING THE EXTENSIONS FOP, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO'S. 9659, 11459, 11x63, 11013, 9619, AND 11564. WHEREAS, applications have been filed for time extensions for the above - described projects, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2 of Ordinance 28 -8, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held duly advertised public hearings for the above- descriebed projects; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described tentative tract maps. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That providing economic cn '.•itions have caused a lack of financing and 'nigh. interest rates for construction; B. That these economic conditions make it unreasonable to Laild at this time; C. That strict inforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Codr; D. That the granting of said time extensio:s will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or wel- fare, or materially injurious to properties or improve- ments in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Ranc :io Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants time extensions for the abova- described proj -cts as follows: Tract Expiration Date 9659 June 22, 1983- 11459 June 22, 1983• 11563 June 10, 1983• 11013 June 10, 1983• 9619 June 10, 1983• 11564 May 26, 1983 - 'qI Resolution No. Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIc 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER., 1 981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary o- t e P anning umm scion I, JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, r a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of O to -wit: ctober, 2981, by the following vote - AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: tow,"'. Iw:IY1lN. L V. SIfC, IYC. .0 wnY wcnA Awn,Y InYnG. G Y']L] 1]11) Yl0 -llY1• Plll P[S: /OW N WC 710 l — I.w.IwnU )i0 wO. Arw� 1 ilr 7 G n)w 1 MFI]m VII1111m: '+wr.+ll Wb 0NW[t YNI n Mrrylw IpS Lw;w Iwrotil, G 91]II E.U. tb. Im In,YN .Ina aY.m. G 91M1 Lrgl LI.YI,o„n N, IMp wllrn A,.M !. 41. NI C9. S1L Ynl .N it.wt G. 9MlY w � .l•n... c+vA 1. v +rr+v r✓ aY+zz ✓YUwA pp, Na ia� i N r \` 1 c.� i TENTATIVE J /.S:A ,ACT NC. 9519 IN THE CITY o= RAwL7i,co CUCAMONGA L,CIIICY A 7178S71VI".ON A550CIATION LdUJDS OF 1Or IC flIpCC 17, CIJGFNlc�N4 A..HOL,C_.E9 AS rrL' '�A-r F_CbICD� IN TiGt�K c. TALC .16 fiF fM�S> ta' -CCU p�' •rye couNTY OF tau EcKNnfCplNol cA. 141 OI,TaICII VAIr.- AUc;u.r MBO I.Y.0lnlll flm Pltn[t f. W Y. 1• LUY.47YVDUlK12 AlM1N MAP rm IIG COMIYe. bww O.t+w.[a. G 91)10 L 7LE CDU[,a>rt1+L OkADINC P1N11 IOLg10l' t, DEY91 %41y On SIYAGL 01!f019,: Ta C 8 9NICCLy, !i O T NC CQ LptIC 11YI rf. 4YCMN Ok wIlLA MAN I. G C SrTa6 ! Tl P¢AL 5K110 4a• 9- i•P,0p0 I� roes. . x 14-r- LOT r; Ncu ants'+ lvrwwNa- rIC b7 LIYUS TrLY' I.F- I:Gnm: .6C . ILyY•p'L, n� PACr, b9L •N P.wrsTl WA' k T IJIC i 1,; S � I �IX rl1^ o-A � � F'Ne ai.]s1 q,9M10 rr,rK♦ >r /qIQ x17c� r9�1 -n e � v. • a- - 4 V /!•ARI -- — ....� 1 _ $ Firruw: ,TriCe> alnurY__ ae +l.al,. I �l' 919 I -jJKCt M tc,�• 11/ _. . G 1]NMCLA[+OP K-!]'ISL Le—c'C. Td4gt't "09'Wf.IS - �. .. �. 21C0.71C - 1. T 3� J 1 VICINITY MAP IIO 4.C.N.1: Tj 40 dTLLi J /.S:A �Mrvw rt YYJYO� �� •Y V MM /M 4.x.1! M4✓M N Mr 'I j ' % �� ',_/IS1 w dr. r(Aere1 So,nw --. ' Y`Y �! . a;6:s. G _ ✓� =.. _CNOI fl1VNT \ I A 1"� / On 1_l nom• !i'-- ,u�)!�— i 1,; S � I �IX rl1^ o-A � � F'Ne ai.]s1 q,9M10 rr,rK♦ >r /qIQ x17c� r9�1 -n e � v. • a- - 4 V /!•ARI -- — ....� 1 _ $ Firruw: ,TriCe> alnurY__ ae +l.al,. I �l' 919 I -jJKCt M tc,�• 11/ _. . G 1]NMCLA[+OP K-!]'ISL Le—c'C. Td4gt't "09'Wf.IS - �. .. �. 21C0.71C - 1. T 3� J 1 VICINITY MAP IIO 4.C.N.1: Tj 40 ""'^^"Ix Svl ntSP♦ i 1,; S � I �IX rl1^ o-A � � F'Ne ai.]s1 q,9M10 rr,rK♦ >r /qIQ x17c� r9�1 -n e � v. • a- - 4 V /!•ARI -- — ....� 1 _ $ Firruw: ,TriCe> alnurY__ ae +l.al,. I �l' 919 I -jJKCt M tc,�• 11/ _. . G 1]NMCLA[+OP K-!]'ISL Le—c'C. Td4gt't "09'Wf.IS - �. .. �. 21C0.71C - 1. T 3� J 1 VICINITY MAP IIO 4.C.N.1: Tj 40 11 ul �1 • 2 < � I i 1 t \ Sw try Ai � I tC �VwV �F a „ a 1 V , I' ,1 I� � 1 •J V w � ypy 11 • 1 n w 9 Lit � ♦; V_ ^Q zz ' fat •� • 2 < � I i 1 t \ Sw try Ai � I tC �VwV �F a „ a 1 V , I' ,1 I� � 1 •J Y. 11 • 1 • 2 < � I i 1 t \ Sw try Ai � I tC �VwV �F a „ a 1 V , I' ,1 I� � 1 fne9o( Ow l7wM! �SXMl f"' T `' .' 11 • 1 •� � `7 III yC. fne9o( Ow l7wM! �SXMl f"' T `' .' � 'es•zv'e'w zr r 1 i l fit, z Vl ° I t i m e � � CE �i a 1�. , ;II i{ I� I { 'O r,y —al •�• s: p iF Ii' 1 D uu�n ,I n = AIML z +u t � s 3 � 'es•zv'e'w zr r 1 i l fit, z Vl ° I t i m e � � CE �i a 1�. , ;II i{ I� I { 'O r,y —al •�• s: p iF -T+w- uu�n ,I n = AIML � 'es•zv'e'w zr r 1 i l fit, z Vl ° I t i m e � � CE �i a 1�. , ;II i{ I� I { 'O r,y —al •�• {T o� q m: 1 N Z• � C + r1' ♦`� s: p iF e n ,I n = AIML z +u {T o� q m: 1 N Z• � C + r1' ♦`� iF e n srt n = AIML z +u t � m Jl o , Tr I=- cr i P Wiz:. a I 7 //::5 owa/7 `0' T-- � ? �ti ZQ l.V v vV eeYY W1 41 1 � i W dj o � F >iiSC �o Nz `? J/: N3 /Y /w AI. M.�rM� -+�1 A1K111M 1 I -j - � � -�I A�'nYMTJMr ty wt v �/ •-� � � ,,. � e � �p�vxo,c 7nialrm .✓ i i "1 Y/MitYT ��7 p��u �o I I i 4 A ' v� 1 I• ` it �y�o��,�,a I� ;I�•I! �1 1 I ��,o i z "'ill i'Jl. ;�O•,�l .. I h �t Fi� E v 'wqW ORI,�h }'�`• °psi _--mss— I :� 3'?: W7" tnv1 1 1 • C :\ It� � rw ��• � � J ff {�7i lio'I w1 �MIM I GSc ilv ov.� 07 9' N• IH33 I , J.OuNi.3° . 1 l.%� ' ODtlui Nu : tl lmr/v✓v x rlms n m 7 �.➢ � vT OO 6B960N DV .L v a,xl ( !f' 3 /!1111 N�31' 4 a` i` 1 I Y � �I I it . � I IN , , 5i j' T rF' f�"X /_'� ,. , * - -: f; �, •.,, den ; 1�:� �•, � �.1 r (�� cd ; �I I� I ` \`� � ry� •� I r \ I I Y I I I I Q Li E CITY OF RANCHO C,'CAMMONGA PLANNING DIVISION C5V NORTH ITEM ILexhE6 TITLE EXHIBIT: SCALE: E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 28, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, D)rector of Community Development BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -3 B:W.L.C. - The development of a 31,940 sq. ft. industria building on 2.14 acres of land in the General Industrial category located on the east side of Etiwanda, south of Beryl - APN 229 - 141 -13 ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting review and approval for the develop - nent of an industrial manufacturing building as described above. The project has completed the development and design review process and is now before the Planning Commission to receive environmental clearance. BACKGROUND: This review is for environmental assessment to determine any significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. The site and architectural design is not considered at this time unless it is related to environmental concerns. To determine significant adverse impacts, an Initial Study on Environmental concerns is completed. Upon completion of that study, evidence would indicate either no significant impacts or the potential for significant impacts. If a determination of no significant impacts is made based upon the Initial Study, then a Negative Declaration may be issued for the project. If significant impacts are found, then an Environmental Impact Report shall be required to fully analyze the impacts of the project. The detailed site plan and elevations will be reviewed and approved with ap- propriate conditions by the City Planner, contingent upon approval of the Negative Declaration by the Planning Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with such findings, then a Negative Declaration would be in order. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon analysis of the Initial Study, it appears that the project will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment. If the Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Negative Declaration for the project would be in order. ITEM B DR 81 -32 (Staff Report) -2- Respectfully sub itted, . «`` f?j El •� „ A JACK LAM, AICP, Director - of Community Development JL:DC:cd October 28, 1981 Attachments: Part I - Initial Study Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit C - Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit D - Elevations Exhibit E - Conceptual Grading Plan 11 11 Ll El CITY OF RMT010 CUCMIONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET — To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $8.0.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through Lhe department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis. staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Nagative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: 3 and S Investments APPLICAN'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 13ARb,1 IE IVOLI--F* LANG *CHRISTOPHER /Arc'ii. ects 9375 Archibald Ave., Ste 101 Ranct.o Cucamonga, CA 91730 (714) 987 -0909 NAME, ADDRESS, "_ELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING T:itS PROJECT: lon F:rlandson or Andrew Barmakian 9375 Archibald Ave., Ste 101, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (714) 987 -090? LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 8S8S Etiwanda Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, CA Ap8 0229 - 141 - 13 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Building Permit - City of Rancho Cucamonga . I -I PROJECT DESCRIPTIO14 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Garden setting indusroffice comnle^ leasable space for light to medium industrial usaite and coimnercial uses. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 33,600 s.f. of new-tilt-up hrildinz— existing 4.200 s.f. metal building is to he demolished. DESCRIBE THE ENVIROn,!ZNrAL• SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORM -WILON 014 TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCEPTIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTIONQ OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): of the City limits. The property slopes gently south (2 -1/20) and is 'devoid of any indii —noes flora 'rho Property is visited infrequently _been entirely developed for at least ten -ears and the new project shall. incorporate a significant increase in available natural habitat for the animal life of this region. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? Nn I_ 2 I] 11 WILL THIS F,^.OJECT! Y:S FO _ aX 1_ Create a substantial change in ground contours? XX 2- Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? XX 3_ Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sew.ge, etc.): XX 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? XX Fzemove any existing trees? How many? XX G. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Eyplanation of any )LL.§L answers above: TMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information reouired for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the .facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evallation can be made by the Development: Review Committee. .. ., Date August �2, 1983. Signat 7X-13 Title c T , 4 o Rr 1091[ ?L':ILt•M a s/ { =wi =� Y •� I �VVt \r.Y 0 -rt tt� 5�: N Iz yy rynnry ��yj 61jA � ~T � I M•w WL •I 1', l,, 1 ',', 1,. � I J I r r 1 1 'o 1 !•' 1 r '.1 C'I Ili 1, Il r t( f J. ILI > 1t I 1 00 no Inn N ? 1 11 4, Din am 4 b 4 4 ✓' •{ LU t 1.30 G G ry q r q p 'G V , p Cl m 12 to 1 � 1 �'.ryS yQfj +'.:i. anb o .1';J.•a�;W ;�f.'+ IOtp.� .' 1 J ,i goo ta ♦ 1 I � I � i�• f ♦� 1' 11 1 KI Li � 11. 1 ,la tiy�w� k l ;- �',4tlA ■• "I�.d <r. e''pt ^. fit' '�„ r �►' +' 4.: 1 rl � y(� r �' 4� � � Ln / 1 ✓�,r ;y�, I i �':. .•i,�,` :,`u ts� � � :• .'L ,r,�.. a "� I / r A. l,) e is �rl ''•, 1' •i i' 1 1 4 II 11 b 1. 1, I y'. 1'1' I • �1• )i 1 I l ,1 , ' f �� " �I 1 ' ' 1 ' 1, 1' 1 f l 11 1� 1 � I i I f i •, l f ,. 1 t r ry r' f � � �. �i. 1 '7k r.r f•/ �� , F �i ;, yr„I.��pt 9 r".I � 1 � � , 11r 1 IY' r, i. lit r. ir wT ,I1v�1 11...] • ;f :fir °I � �: I ,� �. 6f. I f I'. El �1. T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 28, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Arlene J. Troup, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REAPPLICATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11549 - PHASE I - LEW total residential development for design review approval of 27 single family dwelling units on 17 acres of land in the R -1 zone located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue between Summit- Avenue and Highland Avenue - APN 225 - 181 -26 ABSTRACT: Tentative Tract 11549 was approved by the Planning Commission Ws a tract subdivision on May 6, 1981 conditional to reapplication as a total development- in order to approve the design review portion of the Residential Assessment System. Before you tonight for your approval are the architectural elevations of the proposed dwelling units for Phase I of Tentative Tract 11549. The Design Review Committee has reviewed them and found them to be an appropriate style fii the Etiwanda area. ANALYSIS: Phase I of Tentative Tract 11549 includes 27 lots. The pro- posed houses are single story houses with three or four bedrooms. Four basic floor plans are proposed with 11 variations of the architectural treatment and further variations of colors. The different types are scat- tered randomly throughout the site. All units have a fireplace. Each unit has an enclosed garage, some are front entry, some side entry, and some are detached from the main structure. Several homes have "U" shaped driveways. The building setback lines conform to the approved Tentative Tract Map. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the submitted material. If the Commission concurs with the findings of the Staff, adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions of Approval would he appropriate. Respectfully su mitted JACK LAII,- "AICP;` Director of Community Development JL:AT:cd ITEM C r Iz l I, �11 '.11. • :1 I'. I' I. 1" 1. '1. • l• f r 1 1 / i 111 1 .r., r r I• , � I 1 1 f' I, 1 ?�\ 1y �1 11 /fff K ' I 1• 4 1 ! 111 I, �11 '.11. • :1 I'. I' I. 1" 1. '1. • l• f r 1 1 / i 111 1 .r., r r I• , C71, f' � I ?�\ 1y �1 11 /fff K ' A 1• 4 lJ • 111 1 , y llr I, �11 '.11. • :1 I'. I' I. 1" 1. '1. i 111 1 .r., r r I• , ': I ` 1 �,„y t r K n 1• 4 I'll :•,. P'.r+IJGDTTIMY'Ii�3C yfl. Ir••101 .._�.� t^ _ f • �1 a 4 \ •'. J CC I II : li / 14' 'b�Tl JD a0 •'M�G•:'�9Y�� f.�f�,��p,J\naI I> f> Oa J• I/ W . •• IV M. aC IV. n ➢ le `f n n '� I Lila 1 _ t J I J P/ O • 1 t � � 91 » I G � 1 r6Jl'i'+tw �f' 1 to % I 0 I u I 1e ,\ a 1 I '.:. Oneijtp' r � NORTH CITY OF ITEM: - RA\'CI-IO CU(N,10 \'GA TITLE- T-riA mil, ��f\kt PLAN � �N CC DIVISION EXI 1113iT A __ SCA LE- -R&-- I allir- t�C Ntrl ^n R./f! Yi SIN'% w..v/.N � jr�V'P PI Pty: llFl(ft14C^��,j'.1I[ '.rol': a, titT :•,. P'.r+IJGDTTIMY'Ii�3C yfl. Ir••101 .._�.� t^ _ f • �1 a 4 \ •'. J CC I II : li / 14' 'b�Tl JD a0 •'M�G•:'�9Y�� f.�f�,��p,J\naI I> f> Oa J• I/ W . •• IV M. aC IV. n ➢ le `f n n '� I Lila 1 _ t J I J P/ O • 1 t � � 91 » I G � 1 r6Jl'i'+tw �f' 1 to % I 0 I u I 1e ,\ a 1 I '.:. Oneijtp' r � NORTH CITY OF ITEM: - RA\'CI-IO CU(N,10 \'GA TITLE- T-riA mil, ��f\kt PLAN � �N CC DIVISION EXI 1113iT A __ SCA LE- -R&-- I 0 •1fflAN• CD dIAV'p /p CITY OF RANCHO CUC%-1 NIONGA PLANNING DlXrISIW\ ITEM 1 TITLE L`il 11131T. _ ___ SCALE:�r r�u rl V NORTH J� ■,r 1.t 1: 11 �e7.r11�W�i� •�uYu CITY O RAI CHO CUCANIONGA YLANNINC Dj\rjS1Q,? V V NORTH ITEM: TITLE:_ E1P vat. or. , �l 1cL V� s4 EXI 1111IT: SCALE: IC�uceci 11 w�i•. •M•IW..., •�..1MY \•µ�11•tln M• t'P!f •p Ntl til L[Wif NOMff s�.=srun�•r• CITE' OT RAINCHO Ct (AiN,10.NGA PLANNING DIVISION TITLE : &y6 LX IBIT: F-- SG1:_E- Z��u c� NORTH iii�s wr iss ym ^VLnT10N .• .•wwnms<s.n�l tiut t �nM -Y+n LIWiMilf El V V NORTH CITY Ol, ITEM. T7 i �, q —F Iv,:c- 1 RANCHO CUCANIONGA TITLE: -3)6t\ ,r- � 7 PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE- �elw 4?A l .,.., �. uwn womu E �ibV7 �_F_VATIOr.J C11,Y O RAI CHO CUCAiN,10, 'GA PLANNING DIVISION ;.eGi��i'•tifMGCeruri I a MWIY NUMI% V FORTH ITF.N1= _= 11 Cy q 1 TITLE: . iPla y\ G.XI11131T- ---y- SCALE 1-R= j L''J E CITY Or, RANCHO CU&MMONGA PLANNING DI`'ISION N(R'rl -I TITLE: �i ag�� .A., EXI EMT: _-__ a SCALE: k'-A° knr� • ��' ��% =� 1i =i��Ji yr'1A. L'4_ u.}V__..Y.. —. �.._('!r. ✓_ _C nIVGN_._HGL I. _. Nl.... +i.!'; _.ruC✓ J1 plo0A _4Ai1__UI_R'L_!', :p— ••I Ij - I I/ -.f _ _ n,(L ,y,lP1.: r•1'' ✓Ll_�_�:L ^.� wY4_4'.OS1. L4V!._ANL_.111__:Li.__!:I IC — •. al'J'1_.YV S> L'GO.__ 4H \._i1L�_!2_Jl[H1 I " E4- 4'li Is N07 \12 -r- •. •• JICIAO.. Yyl_9._q ✓L» ry...l "IaY�_ _u1NVPN_JlA41. —L� �IIO U_.— NI_5.11. Yn CN _.. _mqC n4_p•V •,.9^l`9_•P pq_ __ _ Y+ Mia E CITY Or, RANCHO CU&MMONGA PLANNING DI`'ISION N(R'rl -I TITLE: �i ag�� .A., EXI EMT: _-__ a SCALE: k'-A° knr� CITY OF RAINCHO CUCANIONGA PLANNING DIVISION 1 ".7 L-LA "p-, L-� J, 1�1� NORTH ITEN 1: TT. I \ '5) 1� q TITLE: EV IIBIT-- H SCALE-. R�Aslc-,P-A 11 9 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1.1549 -1, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, BETWEEN SUMMIT AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE IN THE R -1 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 25th day of September, 1981, a complete application was filed by the Lewis Development Company, applicant for the e,bove- described project; and 11HEREAS, the Design Review Committee has recommended approval of said project, with appropriate conditions; and WHEREAS, the project point rating exceeds the minimum threshold as required for the Deiign quality Section of the Growth Management ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: Findings.: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme areas, specific plans, community plan, boulevards, or planned developments. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future devel- opments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. 3. The architectural design of the proposed develop - m�nt is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this Ordinance and the General Plan of the City. 4. The design of the proposed development would pro- vide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically appeal= ing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 2: Conditions of Approval: Site Plan and Design Review for-7 Tentative Tract No. 11549 -1 is approved subject to the following conditions and the attached standard conditions: I. The Developer shall comply with all conditions of approval of Tentative Tract No. 11549. 2. The Developer shall include provisions to accommo- date future front yard irrigation systems. As a minimum, such provisions shall include the installa- tion of Schedule 40 PVC pipe loops under driveways and sidewalNs. 3. The Developer shall submit a site plan and elevations for Lot 22 to be approved by the Design Review Com- mittee prior to issuance of a building permit for that lot. 4. C.C.& R.'s, including maintenance of the equestrian trails, shall be prepared and submitted to the City for approval prior to recordation of the final map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1921. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of October, 1981, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: El 1�: L V 6 11 F V u W w N G p T = r. != (w V u° a w� N 6 U Y V u e N 4 R J 0 O C O J v v n d V b N r 5 M W F S K V L S A O k 6 VJ C V. =a J O wC V a O LL vc — a V � L'C u c. u G C a� V . b V V u q V v b O V Q Q M o 0 f c V �O:✓ LCmN� � O _V V 4 I. p 4 q « r o V V V« L V N '� � U v,✓ ✓ L d 0 p q �� T- o 00 h ✓L <- �' O q T L N u n L r �✓ ✓ N E G G u G 4 L- V u LuL l N .•� t CU .0 V V y V • y A C'•- i N Q• L ' V u V O ` ✓ C 1= -.O•r C > Y rTV L✓\..r Vy✓�` Y V GUS A V V uJ' .. v Yrr r a Sb a. ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ J a ✓ u .f O ✓ C q �. > I i C V •- Cl m C N C f V U •. � d r'nv u A « Il V y. V ✓ L V NV n LV T✓rV NI u ✓� o J= m� � L V O ✓U ✓ V lr <y vo N Y •O.n 4} YV L N \Dp �j Yr?� •nNV r4 •! «^ i NO ri A` G G ✓ run /« y« •^ LnLv u Oa ^O✓ �'^ F U✓ U t u G � V V l V 1 w. V •L V 1' O '- C V h .r P W ` •I ha _ V .�i� � �d U V ie ✓ L r✓ro �- A :• V rr ON �� V b-rti Wi `d V L A O NO 1� N G r• V.r.�r h V ✓�C � s� b✓ LC q wV ^ L ^. M�rgN l 6 LI>✓ LY. _� V�r L01 Lr w p l`L C ca V b > N N a1: ur !a L- ra O O �• O N V O✓ L' V d L n O t V "� r L L 6 •- W q P A Y 4 � V Q O � O •^- I tll • J l NV Y t' n L�.C• NC d N �V LNN N V JV'^ .Gir y .Y t✓cam wi .N. .. m° J q .+ .^ N ✓rP O l[U W+ y �« � N qN'•' V N ^crr >..• LTV rt•.n Y .. 4 � O N u -^ LLN O ord.a vLd. N E ctlr✓ V 4 t.� <"^iVV L <+T .>. tlr L YO d 1• r V ✓r ^Y� O Cwl:� A tC qd YVY I-4: H }yJj = .0 /1uV LN `4'M \M,w � c r J u� r}r L rNir lV r 0 rL•' p O C O d V V L tY V N C 0 4 N V+ t �� � `✓ �^ -`✓N N:. ��Nl� r f q� M^ Lr. V T.• YPA L YN N✓ J L' ^ C C l N •. m« u V A V l q . iy � V r do uo•p u-. rr ae �`..c ��'fti «fr L'u0 0. V 11W11m Uir✓ nl V•- c ♦.. 4� nV L'd w }L •tlirr� C R O^ w NM V � li - L �� V V � Y CLi V N > i r 0 v L C V y c C A (' w✓i L ✓( A •N A U N a � ✓ ✓ 7 A N V N Qr V -- d )- ., �.6 .0 r<o v o .n c.°,. <.fi� td. Y � Y -w �i \I..' .`. ✓ntlrii �a inYH \ ✓I NI NI tyl lI 1 ll JI I 1 �I /I Y V u e N 4 R J 0 O C O J v v n d V b N r 5 M W F S K V L S A O k 6 VJ C V. =a J O wC V a O LL vc — a V � L'C u c. u G C a� V . b V V u q V v b O V Q Q M o 0 f c V �O:✓ LCmN� � co _V V 4 I. p 4 q � r o V N a V« V N '� � U v,✓ V L d 0 C G C Yv<•i��u h ✓L <- �' O q T L N u n L r �✓ ✓ N E G G u G 4 L- V f T LuL r,V - ✓^ F!i O N .•� t CU .0 �w • y A C'•- i N Q• L ' V u V O ` ✓ C 1= -.O•r C > Y rTV L✓\..r Vy✓�` Y V GUS A V .. v Yrr c..'c` Sb a. ✓ ✓ ✓ u .f O ✓ C q �. > I i C V •- Cl m C N C f V U •. � d r'nv u A « Il V y. V ✓ L V NV n LV T✓rV NI u ✓� o J= m� � L V O ✓U ✓ V lr <y vo N Y •O.n 4} YV L N \Dp �j Yr?� •nNV r4 •! «^ i NO ri A` G G ✓ run /« y« •^ LnLv u Oa ^O✓ �'^ F U✓ U t u G � V V l V 1 w. Y •L V 1' O '- C V h .r P W <. •I ha t. oq .�i� � �d d••V- fl 4 ^r fJ 1. E a N u O m 4 trr 0 f � � co _V V 4 I. p 4 q � r o V N a V« 4 L Y U C G c C c Z a L N u > iN L v. O •^ �w u V LL ✓ �• C V b O LL 6q L u V u• ^PO Y V V OV A V .. v Yrr c..'c` Sb a. ✓ ✓ ✓ kc "P o Cl yc Q r'nv .. b � r N vaa u ✓� MV V lr <y -- ^ rU N Y pw 4} YV L N \Dp �j Yr?� •nNV r4 c'o i.✓n A` ✓a 41); run /« y« •^ LnLv u Oa ^ P O � y T nr aNV 1' O '- C V c am .r P oc «a.. ha t. oq .�i� � �d d••V- ON �� b-rti Wi `d WwP bb NO b✓ N O N q ^ L ^. M�rgN l 6 LI>✓ LY. _� V�r L01 Lr w p l`L C ca V b > N N a1: ur !a L- ra O O �• O N V O✓ L' V d L n O t V "� r L L 6 •- W q P A Y 4 � V Q O � O •^- I tll • .' V l NV a t' 4 ^+ L�.C• NC r \' V••-6 N �V LNN N V JV'^ .Gir y .Y t✓cam wi .N. .. m° J q .+ .^ N ✓rP O l[U W+ y �« O k d N b V qN'•' Y 6 b�C ^crr >..• LTV rt•.n Y .. 4 � O N u -^ LLN ord.a vLd. N E C✓ q r t .arroo Ns v �'U �`n tC qd YVY I-4: H }yJj Qy .0 /1uV `4'M \M,w ^r fJ 1. E a N u O m 4 trr rY 0 f � co Inc 4 I. v V u � � r o V C G c C c Z a u N u iN L v. O •^ u V LL ✓ �• C V b O LL 6q L u V u• ^PO Y V V OV A V .. v Yrr c..'c` Sb a. ✓ ✓ ✓ O •+ V V Q ✓ V N —mc � r N Pp u ✓� V lr <y -- ^ rU N Y It N - ✓ L N V ✓ O \. rY L V 1�^4 r•1� V OLL J �- - � „ q T - - 4 Y n ✓l' u C.q � `�u�u niC FLU J � � �U c - ' •, V N .. L 1: N d � u. 4 D l c .' - it ,� L .- I I ' .e � V Q N 4. W V ue Y� •r O Yi C' :'_ Y Y.L V � f .C.. r •O. V V ✓ N . .i ^.n u V- y •„r- N -� m9 1 N � .- ✓ l 1 ..N NY n ^ -Y n �_ Y• Y-.` LVJ I.V_ Vm�` - t I e_ V iii 'J ^:. u _ ou 4' V J d V •., LL J` r .Ni . . r C 4, L�� I: '. •: 'm a� W P N F L 1 �." T N O V v� N n na - _ I ✓ w y h 0 rU L - T O L y ✓ >.` v'n Cu ,i V c,C �T Y u r.•N Ou.n Ltl� 4 �O .0 4 V ..- V `� -N•V- LNA`•u � � O` N C L L 4 S v � ,� 4� n C <r L r.• i N� 'J I I u � N u ` N S O U Ln !LL N •3] r,r > rN,L !i A ^ N N C - L L L ✓ � W Y � N y _ I L 2 y, L C` Y= L Or - �V U ✓ O V -IV U N � IV W - A [•. u - C ' L'a u W y (. L L W � fr. C r` I ... .� N V �> V ` ... ` u V V N V .- V c u t w IL N � • V V nl � -� •� w t, l w .•r ✓ O. ✓r V L N - !y V L' � N )i rr •A t' \ ✓ Y -� ` 4 v �r rl, � ..i �. n I n, V W O✓ N 4 C u c C �. -- I � 4 C .. C' L r- �. N Y Yr •r u � V. �r C> u I N Y L W n rw 1 '�' r' V"i. �- at _<. Vr.� n L- V O q " V W•'Y•G N'.✓L� •'+ '- _ r " 2 { LV <r V u [l T W .� .> O � .--."- •� f 9 T•. q L 4 •- V V -'- L L u .: Y. w t p 1 O •�U� V ��LO/.' .Vr ..O.0 J:. n• tn� w C -- R LJW �J✓ _ I �• dV ��= LN- a u% r U u N + .�-' ! r.. LLCM - LL N L N .� O q •.� w C'.. s• `' _ V ... V VUL- Ly '� mSw UVU nl �.��JU 1'n L w'!`: M .� WON It 4u.tu r :r ^ UVr u _ •n `r rJIN W � >r n- •a u U m Y N N O� m V - l j Y U. r ( V y W L " ° ° >' -I o c_ rn i.- i •°- :. ti ;: a .. :> c .°> w •,. rn' _ W r,r ._ : - L " .` :) 1- .: TVL i IJ .•C,' N d O Wu UV TVA �� ��Lr LPL �VUW NVL,V. IR-- -V a'T ml P� NV V� m'Y CI • ^V v _' V 1 V, flu n�J� Gu,u.i4 LLNr Ny> � ^r Lly ^^C ^ N •-J C�J jr�V VVN AOL M u u. - T S rY L Y. • .•J 4 C. - C V TYr✓ ��Y C V C S> •f - n p u •` � m q 4 l• i d �. � ^i t- � u S C: � jR. V S ur V i L ^.- u t o .J N C V 6 V C (1 V .•. O✓ I. O rl q N .i _ .. ✓ "oi -i_ .% J O rl 0 U V W nr O u • nJ N Y l P C L .-' V Sr V °. T.Y�c q - '� 1-i fVV ✓L � - •],•drU �. �M r:V [Y ^u � ^`u W C.N L; J. S� Vt ` V= V 9 O y W S N V Y, A n C Y U y •nT• LL u C >: L m 4 L .- ✓ C J ^ U O ^-•^_ u -`. n N U • m aC'�" `m � _a ✓.J acv o .�Y. o .. ^. W` 6� 1 � - L C '- Y'J i. d O f. .-. n tl W rJ G .•' V i• •^ V V W- G .4 R, A < u C � N m _ Y ^ ^LCV�1'�L rt N S•U W 'J .w- ylO� NwLY. y VV �y C'C � N L Y L � L u C. d q u C. f V l L C L >Li V y W l' .- ✓� q Y Or•� = TN ., Tr Lq ♦.•'v..L �. --.r- V u �� u]V uN U l 4 � .� /l UL <,= •`!. °� �.�c °c o�u'� � ou A u arc v - cr' ✓ c o ` Q; . � N - d ✓ Y y U 4 N V Y O� Li P u W q p C N n .._ u N N u -n• V •. wr t> L] O a .J d � C r u o f r ^ U•-_ C Ly OrJ � U p V q f' V N P N J C V C •� � L v- U V -^ J7 �+ tT u L 4'.- i. 6 V u l ru L q 3r � N� � U � N C A � _ It M n)J ^ C r6A 6C. :auaVr .-. 4cY Snr ^Y ✓. j: u V `C L C! >.7 -pi L�O NC Y ✓ i_ ��✓ J L O. � C u Y, tr u� S P c 'J a -> V G�r�r O }•c -N C4r- p«m �0 �q✓WN�43 ^✓ .>lll NASO 'V 1 f. .T..Y .>, 6 C ` LV �N V LLOO� -AS 1 u �_ - •4. n-yU qC•Y_ q � .n Ul rl N •> V� . 1 u uS �N� t- p H� L C` y: � 'j rt r p C ^ M - u N` Y• L t. u✓ O O V u Y' N Or " i w O LPN l U '� (l J W U V {t V �✓ u p N 4+ d u f . L U'- O C. N W` U N C y q V � q S >n -� .. - Y L .- i •r u i ._ a> 4 ✓: r W . Ic u U .~.. 6 � y O Q A ` U gNU.Oir JNNm WN ,.line v> � S.W%.0 t ^'1'V !Y ._V N >_ OlO T niNq• ^6 c�.- mn .O � N q l u � L W A N -N .• fJ N N �SGFi •y ^•O A C> _l �: w YyI A L� L V W � 4 l w V I) Ar VI N � V_ n C V� O 4' O S O N L t L' NS+ j Y,V F- L w C � W u d N. -_ •_ C y ~'^s .. W N r N U ^ q � N •: C VJ (.. y� � N LL C A l'L. r M N L_ 1. 1- u N L' Ly 1 •�'^ r `' L .. •Nir u: N `^ 1 L f. i s a_ r V! O ^t u C q d V c n „ p V V i l' 'O> T - S O L-•- b- j. u W V r u c nJ W > � q !J lin } N O A .5z uCu o n `rn .. VS _. b =� L -m N L W TJ C otr u✓ L '] T L Y C V T M•�Nnc yo p ...N min u �•on u .- VJ U<V.p Y �, �! L. .�� 1c u ^u .V. Ili \'r O�` NOV {. J t NU V^ V ^ Lv�Yr rU- L���..' ^T}V�.: ✓(l ✓404 NI Oy +'1 /W 4 p' r F 4.�. -L' .�- ti <d. L.^l` VdN�M L NV yy (• � L G✓ ti G W t y>'. •-W' L MN4 LC y VyW L` <rt W1: 4 �C•N 6L rC O A} G .. 1+ j' .^ j 1- Lu� • 1,,. J A O 4 4 J V a p 4 Cr V Y V N i> V ! 5 V 6 V W N W u V T Q } ^I ml PI aI ^I hl �I• V �I `� � V - I /! _I W 1,'• Y' L Y p d n E I -� 1 r u V ^ W V ✓ C l'Y L ^ I u N fl `r I_ C1 V -� C .n-Jr r. N u yW u V y •• .., u u ur �V .•^ C u u u l L` r� _ JO •n -J ly ^� �• U. u�a a'C ,CMy <l =.. <,L u� ] V i � V L } tl✓ W F' f .' V A ^ <� C O L w. LL I !` tr .J N V N C✓ V/ ur N •IC •• y 1 _r L ._ T C ^ n C N �r l i. L ` V A ✓1 i O =0 Y fin/ •N Liru O V .' C O _ V'L x•7 V W rlr N �` �^� 7u lLr_d ^ti's q ~'� <q CL C /T L' � y•^'Vw- Vi?jOV i u _' i <r0 - ^ '^ `� ° N _4 C .. q l4 ul1lW 1 •rr 0. '� ^ ` q Pin Cl W W -¢. .L„ ¢ � A W✓N.. aN � �. is i •^ .T. >. < a J.�N w c � o.._ N rrr [. J: i1.n �'•N✓ Or �` �_jC rN c�r.p EI N �, N .. L i• ci °I °' � L �. o o' v � w W l o i' _ � > c r. ^ - ~�m N% c �' ` ^' � o>' vi �� rTNii •: A l �N [ � .v./r IP � t N/ -JUG � ^'L u° c -L, ✓0. V.`q '`. °p: � .:. '� A ar N's ✓r}} , V Q /LyC V� O,/`, _ i+ V. rir .N >} [JO v t F. Lou ar V u ^N +rn• ( n l' N [7 O. ✓ a rr u W p � m �'�_ �r ^: '_.O NL� _W ^1 -� f v6 •� V M •N F/ 11`U a 1 -yr l'r'•C• W [[C'�_ n''^ J LL N 5, uT 4vVV m 1LLN •r. y V r. IY _ .: ` V' C L i' L.� N -.JO N �✓ N j ^ TV4r 1. .l r' V O t. ✓ J' V u V a. W C J. n t r> ("_. = D Y C •/ J m- al .� W a/L i v� W `V - me/ �n Y u. ^S •n ✓l + i G c•n, � J,`v L` N[:iL 2 r- r lJ 6 [J vi F , �L R V L u 1- (1 N h0 � }� � y r O P O [i i]uV l�r+irOLL ^ �I 11 1I 0 W c V C .0 Tl t wr r• V C L Or P VO �N✓ lJ CW i( rO�C CJ v.._ � t1CY •nN uC •^O� WV`V NC r^ m Cu_ n_ •iNy N ••ni)V <� a w� Liu N N O N ✓ O. N4V u�( N. x .- rl..L V� JhC u.n O Vi dr NV rVV tl` J OL � ,C.a _•V�O4u ` C C t OO C' O ^N Li N ruP u... Vq N X1"4 ^ +V .-rN- UC7 M �- •/TiN f y'r O 4✓ N N C nV V 4 O N `/VrN i L� V LU /_ ^ � �n MV/u �� RN�l:WN NUr'I q �b W dN .r. wT y V Vr0 W^lV L✓ �iN V V^ VVU nfl _✓N �L ✓ �`C-,ul' rtl ~C ✓VL O Gu � � VC >jurN rW �-w =pC NN4 i •^CUV „ r� V� Li cci L\ LL q VuuM ^nT uy Tl ` '�Jl, h yN V•`/^,]'`/.•l VYtwir LrOV +C"mV�rL N ,C yl f ^1 ✓ A i Vr O li � L n L N ✓ u ,^[-' <'/ O L u N L L J.' V^ 2+ N rJ v S N Ja. p •rr ._ } y _'� N/ j u ._ N L d ?+ C f.V u J ^ Nd uVVP ACV _ UN C C D_yu ✓ A A L u�✓tl >O 6+ ".2 ^/nJ �n O. P!!/b V CV /uT V Y N b u V y b I L p l iLL b L N rqT CN n L N L > . Y 0 V ^ .l N L R. .L .✓ } \V V ” V✓ • 'J q G N N W ✓ V V A_ygV L] L t')6 Nf ^ p N N y V y rl u b—+ y.:�l V Vd rY V[✓LS• <L VrYI A� //F .r OV L!]+>Nr u V c^ V q O, _ �` L ` ^L•/ N V n l u 4 L '+( y, 11 .T.V i~ PJ 6 •^ J ^ rI L N V^ V L N Ttl ✓ N p V}r u '� 1" N 9 n r_ 7. V u r^ a: [ F I. J 4^ J/ u✓ N P T W Nk L N_ ` ATVO ' Cr.-V ^NVS lU NOV Ur F•um NGP C ^WpR Cq^ Vd ? Ol u l> N N Y N V] 'y Vr r r N F L b Vi 0 N'f N /n u V Cr (r6 T u -� O \) V N V N✓ u 0. �- j •^ r+ V V1[r.a G >l N ..- P > u Vry C y ✓VU >r nJ u� _... b(r V/4 ✓ '�✓V _ C c V J rlr L^ C (+ b n• k rl•' L prmv u ✓..b F"C � m poc `Y�-v - i'y'^ _°' m Np o� uNm uml Lu i(n :I .N Y- v._`o` d u^i L V l V N Try .x. oJ+e cq. � or <('i � �,' ... q u c � � x « ;• rlr L}' y _ � _ a'_ n, c N c r. .". ✓ Yr /!. ' u� u N V 9 � L _^ L' `� r.- r+ 11 V •N- .� /U .0 n <l. C1 N L u L nn w C^ V V N N .rUi +. � u N u nC W O 4. < S [Vi V .1-. s V t L v w� t L <u u 1: r✓ .+ L :. V✓ _^ n � �' i N O C C O L W d V P✓ u O V l N N V N N T V. p. q `/ N m 9 ur Jin � C a O - O/ O. li V /] � y-, V `• r+ n��l NI ✓rI �� P I v 3 ql • M1� � I ��_ � I � � u E I V 0 u` i >\ - n V L L cl .F V� Li q Y O V P W r v U F G o` W `w u � 4 u U W a u y G 0 o c G V W L I V J - u V c _ W C C « O _ 1 C V V i C c � P L O O D 1J M cV L «W N C�u r N « W LL « O L O qVC! V - C W [• C W oa ` °iv d C C n p v N N L m O 1. ^ =L 6 L .•. M .._ fin•. L« W y d « q u V •C 4 N q V +Ln .0 w_ W.� C [ ^. V.✓ u � u V V 0 u` i >\ - n V L L cl .F V� Li q Y O V P W r v U F G o` W `w u •' V � V L c n u :fr 2 it J O 0 V Y [i e c ` L C a d N ♦q .L V O o T Y P y [: C q u + P L J J K V O c ^J Iv N m W u v y V i� p >« L q 6 ^ W IJ N r N o. N� r P J V G P u 0 O V r N v u ov U. v L L P L L q L w• O W O uM G p O r• ^ C . «r n � V c n q cLo ✓ 4 w V n � r W W q u ` L n .2c L _ L L VI 4'« -- Y n V w - �o O y Lai+ NI .nl el NI d U W a u y G 0 o c G V .n G V g YJ P 0. «PL u V c _ W C C « O _ 1 C V V i C c � P L O O D 1J M cV L «W N C�u r N « W _ « O L O qVC! V - C W [• C n y N L O V W 7 r •�'- O L m O 1. ^ =L 6 L .•. M .._ fin•. L« W y d « q u V •C 4 N q V +Ln .0 w_ W.� C [ ^. V.✓ u � u V V Ll •^ W �/ 4 p u� NLUn r L.' L •u 1 A ._. 17 'I u V V So •O- I l '^ L a1 ✓� J la _G N i N 'J•u q 4 r ^� Y �^ W W u V 42 l V ✓ bl ^I ZI TI •' V � V L c n u :fr 2 it J O 0 V Y [i e c ` L C a d N ♦q .L V O o T Y P y [: C q u + P L J J K V O c ^J Iv N m W u v y V i� p >« L q 6 ^ W IJ N r N o. N� r P J V G P u 0 O V r N v u ov U. v L L P L L q L w• O W O uM G p O r• ^ C . «r n � V c n q cLo ✓ 4 w V n � r W W q u ` L n .2c L _ L L VI 4'« -- Y n V w - �o O y Lai+ NI .nl el NI d ✓ W a u G 0 o c V .n G V g YJ P 0. «PL C V c P C C « O _ 1 C V V i C c � P L O O D 1J M cV L «W N C�u r N « W _ « O L O qVC! V - C W [• C n y N L O V W 7 r •�'- O L m O 1. ^ =L 6 L .•. M .._ fin•. L« W y d « q u V •C 4 N q V +Ln .0 w_ q O Y L+ V Ll •^ W �/ 4 p Ll 1 1'='1 L'J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 28, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: jack BY: Curt SUBJECT: , Director of Community Development Assistant Planner NO. 8,500 10 R -3 /PD for a total planned development of 72 condo - inimum units on 5e71 acres of land located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona Avenue - APN 202 - 171 -42 ABSTRACT: The applicants have submitted development plans and a tract map for the above - described project in order to gain consideration for approval by the Planning Commission. Approval of this project will neces- sitate the approval of 4 intergal parts of the project; a Negative Decla- ration, the rezoning of the site from R -1 -£,500 (Single Family Residential) to the R -3 /PD tMulti- family Residential /Planned Development), zone, the site plan and building design, and the tentative tract map. The project has been reviewed by both the Design and Growth Management Review Committees and has passed the Residential Assessment System. Staff has prepared a detailed Staff Report, related Resolutions, and Conditions of Approval for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicant, American National Housing Corporation, is requesting approvai of their proposal in order to develop 72 condominiums on 5.71 acres of land located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona Avenue (Exhibits A, B, and C). The application is for a Planned Develop- ment with a density of 13.6 dwelling units per acre. The project site is in the R -1 -8,500 zone and General Planned for medium density residential (4-14 dwelling units per acre). The project site has two existing residences which will be removed or demolished. The property slopes unif:,rmly from the north to the south at approximately 4% except at ti;e north properi:;.• line where the southern boundary of a steep knoll exists. The site is a former citrus grove with Eucalyptus windbreaks along the east boundary line. Approximatley 91 trees of various types will be removed with 11 Oak trees to be preserved. The surrounding land uses and zoning is described as follows: ITEM C PD 81 -01 (TT 11853) Staff Report -2- October 28, 1981 LAND USE ZONING North Existing single family residence with R -1 -8,500 Foothill Freeway right -of -way approxi- mately 150' to the north. South Single Family Residential R -1 East Church and Vacant Land R -1 -8,500 Nest Vacant with approved 200 -unit apartment R -3 complex ANALYSIS: The project is being developed in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act as well as the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. The proposed zone change is consistent with the General Plan. All setbacks, building separation, height, parking, and open space require- ments in the Zoning Ordinance will be complied with. is The project will include 12 six -plex structures. Each structure will have four 2- story, two- bedroom units and two one - bedroom units (Exhibits D and E). All units include a 2 -car attached garage. Thirty (30) addi- tional guest parking spaces are provided throughout the development. Texturized pedestrian crosswalks have been provided as shown on the site plan, but Staff recommends that additional crosswalks and a texturized entry- way into the development be provided to form a continuous pedestrian system. Recreation facilities include a pool, spa, and 2 play areas for children, one with an improved tot lot (Exhibit F). Two points of access have been provided into the project off of 19th Street; the main entrance at the southwest corner, and an emergency access at the soatheast corner. Full street improvements will be required along 19th Street, including dedication of 21 feet of additional right -of -way. The interior road system meets the minimum design standards of the Zoning Ordi- nance with 26 feet curb -to -curb. The streets, landscaping, and open space will be maintained by a Homeowners Association. The preliminary grading and drainage plan has been reviewed by the Grading Committee and given conceptual approval (Exhibit G). Landscaping will be provided throughout the development in accordance with standards and policies set by the Planning Commission (Exhibit H). The applicant proposes to install landscaping with patio fences along 19th St. The fence setbacks will vary from 26' to 45' from the face of the curb on 19th Street. Staff recommends that the maximum height of fences here be 5 feet. Also, additional landscaping treatment will be required to buffer the grade difference between the street and building pad elevations. L'. P.D. 81 -01 (TT 11853) Staff Report -3- October 28, 1981 37 Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees exist along the east project boundary and are slated to be removed by the applicant. Staff recommends that they be replaced with a species of Eucalyptus more suitable to residential land use at 15' on center. Detailed landscaping and irrigat•inn plans will be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits to assure compliance with these conditions. The Design Review Committee reviewed this project finding it an acceptable style for this area. Detailed colored rendering -, site plan and building material samples will be available for your review at the Planning Commis- sion meeting. Please find attached Parr I of the Initial Study, completed by the applicant, which discusses various environmental factors relative to the project. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts on the environment due to this development have been found. If the Commission concurs with this determination, recommendation of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing notice was advertised in the Daily Report newspaper on October 16, 1981. 28 public hearing notices were sent to sur- rounding property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: It i- recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consiA_Pr all matters relative to this project. If the rommission concurs with the findings of the Staff, adoption of the attached Resolutions with Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. Respectfully su itted, JACK. LAM, AICP, Director of Community Development JL:CJ:cd Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit A B C D E F G H I - Vicinity Map - Detailed Site Plan - Tract Map - Elevations - Floor Plans(2 sheets) - Recreation Center Part I - Initial Study. Resolution approving Z.C. Resolution approving Tract map with conditions. - Conceptual Grading and Drainage - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Phasing Plan TENTATIVE TRACT NO 11853 II SITE UTILIZATION AND RADIUS MAP I IN new I \\ I I S •.I FM FNeoon ii � e.n.wa .N.... <.•..c• _ �M^ I' � I eta II g j I I 'I f 1�1 ttN.O = �'- 1"'1_'kl1LNY•mM .� o`F)tY .N.ne ..wnr• — .•O.N.wYNt FY tNM•1 a I 1�1 ttN.O = �'- 1"'1_'kl1LNY•mM .� o`F)tY .N.ne ..wnr• — .•O.N.wYNt FY A) I11 I —•c I n �I RIP '�I • 4 j rt, IY , j w.e.l.N mm 1�1 ttN.O = �'- 1"'1_'kl1LNY•mM .� o`F)tY .N.ne ..wnr• — .•O.N.wYNt FY FORTH CITE' OF ITEM: <- RANCHO CJCAI!✓ UNGA TITLE: -Yk:ArA r r MA PLANNING DIVISIUN EXI-RBIT- °A' SCALE. NZ1i� 11 E �..er.nr .wnr rnu[Ya(nGT10N UUm aunrMll �}1;'( TAMLATION a as At 70 TAL fofal arms ff i oc.enx fa.s W /Ac 0om SP eOVCMOC OU31 O .. fe At M% - xexxlU.wna.�..n•.0 /YPea oil. .a ac "I oxex exact oleo sr•. 22 At .a ims WT 7fre9 fofel Ole.( fa of rnx xtaN9 xa i.3♦ ftAN J fn JJ I 13% �n WYAL ID .01 PAMMO PAIN) .[aVIM( }II Ma Y(a:m 10.0-1 Jo tofnl ,.a .afro -lA:n NORTH Meu rxa Ma M YMrb wnay.M aw•A CITY OF ITEM -- -A- RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: n-m PLANNING DIVISM EXHIBIT: 33 TENT_ \PFPE - MAP TRACT NO. 11853 W Ime GTT OY 11µ[N0 =AMOK& •'• � ....... rw.w.n. n..ni...voi:'.✓.:...... o.w.n.n ••.rww mx. Y1101[pTT 01l�CpMllOp ow.unwwgs �. x.ww�•••ww'w•ri.r.wwnwwxw. LOT WTI YrO YYIMIIr w iYI I A ..IT MOi�O x1,w ...... .w..wx M+ Pa INOY V NORTH CITY Or, ITEM: RANC11® CJCAMOiNGA TITLE: TKP� ! g PLA.NNIN.G DIVIS10,\1 EXHIBIT- G SCALE: 11], ❑. 1 I r. .f 'tip. ��i t� �;�{. A� vV��G, •,��1 A� h �� gi , v 1;. /�� Ir cr' �/ J2il S11111r f 9T i� ^.v f11i Pr ;� ',:�5{YI 4R1j, \1����1111 •11111. 1 1\ \ V � �� 1�• j � l` I• }II1 ` 1�, 11 1'�II� "t }t're •j �.., r.\' !, •�{�1�1 Y'.�{.^. _jar;i7� �Ir�p imi��� Nibnruiii I, , �,a ��- ►• +rte' c�ic�n roll A .N 7� 1 1 t� I��,e ••P'j����fl�j),l 1, ,r \ I I 1. 1 .rat ` ;Y LL •IF ' •�� • I • 1• I . i , xi cif • .1 q1�6 ZngO%1C .ISiMr, G�� 1w HJZK potun P H !�O 66 AoMztK wak%h. CITY O RANCHO CUCA1V ONGA. PLANNING DIVISION 1LLg1CiF149q `I' Lrncu FI `'J.�b, lam( ITEM: G TITLE- TLAt4!a M- ilBIT- I—E _ SCALE: `socerf I 'OF Z-- E E is PLANT LEGEND THCC♦ . •IIW1l11Y1111_LIIIIRV �........ :..i �•x�.u� r ..uuu �� nwa•WI[YIII' w�u.r xrr, •x.w JWU .. ..... .. r •w...rrr .rwM ..n•uu. ,..Fxµr...wx Qr`' /�OIING GOYC1t Dtl11D11D r -m b RECREATION CENTER CITY O RANCI -I0 CUCA1VIOINGA PLANNING DI'VLSION NORTH ITEM: C riTLE= L� �"!T EXHfBIT- -tML. M 11 'CT111M. MG NµL / 1 TM.r N.ANIMM NL11G� LLUW T-- =J VV [FORTH CITY O)' ITE \'h G RANCHO CUCAM©NGA TITLE c��r�, r s irk PL.A.NNIN�G DIVISIUN EXHIBIT = — SCALE: MTs '� 1. 1 •1,� I 4 '.' '.• Xis may`' b/!p� !;` �. Not Ly rz Na ,, '!►,y,' •yD"'\:7:1n,.j�6 pO��FYrIQl�, tip I II Itl 1 �,� \ ? *y v`� `�a . a, ® ®I ;fit '$ ; `• { - In 'T' . y1Nl FiRgb .^vajTir'�z w' M4 %'i yly t ry •; jw A ���� . �•IIII ��'lu�lll_Illlll�..l���j �s ��, {I \ , ;: a <, , StyY�� V IIII���L`111f RR' it . -Pw, M7. 1.x11 i f :�mlliilllllu II;•J ^II� I I II'� °�w' I „��5 S J>� �I �6 �;�y � •911 Iil hiai�� i•+ ,1 r,. �, M1 I , I El ul hl u CONSTRUr,TION PHASINQ PLAN PHASE 1 NURJW Of 2.2A .N w UNRS PHASE 2 NI2DN22 TA,2.12 24 WRS PHASE 3 mklx a <t.t2.1 in UMTS 72 TOTAL WIRS CITY O RANCI-10 CUCAMON A PLANNING DIVISION 'tSURATIOM p uvrt sw.oegl A ITEA I: G TITLE: EXHIBIT- SCALE: riTS (-� NORTH CITY OF RANCI.0 CUCAI!OV,A INITIAL STUDY PART I — PROJECT INPORP4RTION SHEET — To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application., the Environmental Analysis staff will prepal :� Part II of the Initial Study, The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environ_rnental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: - Knolluood Tentative Tract PIo. 11853 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRES TELEPHONE: _�nvrtr- ri HouS nb Corp. 17752 Skvnark Blvd Irvine, CA 92714 (71&. SLoln+ « lwnME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING TIIIS PROJECT: Mr_ -pr�n4 .r {77;, (71L� 9RF Associated i'n i.neers 316 Baer "re, IA CATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO_) Nnrtl•� side of 19ti1 SCrr:et at Rart:ona Avenue, Alta Loma 202 - 171 -42 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, ST11TF AND FEDERAL AGENCIES 7,ND TILE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Building Permit., Cit of Rancho Cucamonga �monga 19th S ra t Imnrovemcnrs_ Cnir.— Y -i PROJFCT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Tentative Tract No. 11853 is a 72 unit R -3 Condominium Development on the North side of 19th Street at Ramona P.venue. The project will include twelve six -olex uni to two bedroom flats and two single bedroom townhouses for total of 72 living units. Four lots will be developed as common ownership lots plus one recreation lot. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY- 5.71 Acres. Two existing residences_ with out buildings totaling 3,300 SF will be removed or dcmolisi.�d. Proposed buildings will ;n ] sd.. l 1a tares of 9,066 c>' far : >nnrox;mate total of 108,792 SF. DESCRIBE THE ENVIFi ticNTAI. SE.TTINC Or THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDIRG INFOR:• ?ATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PL.1ilciS (TREES) , ANIr -V,LS, AIT•i CULTURlL, HISTORICAL OR SCE ?•TIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND TI1E DESCRIPTION OF ANY . EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR. USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) Frop_erty slopes more or less uniformly from north to south at oproximately 4 %. Is a fairly steep scarp more or less along north line. Soils are general 7pL,'i,l�rrr�dn,l and w 1 l- ;.�.l gra_��lna anA -bfl��l�rr5 Of great depth. Site is a former citrus grove Fucalyotus windbreaks exists along the east boundary line (37± trees to bi. removed, A_nprox. 11 Oak Trees to I- �r�`�nL �nrl AAfnw A<• i� Trc, _ nnr llY nve 'lq •ri hn Sin rmmnvnrl A eort�nrl Identifiable w;.ldlife includes jackrabbits, cottontail rabbits,oround squirrel, gophers, coyote,lizard;s, crows, moc,,ingbirds, doves, pigeons, and sparrows. There are no cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Property has been farmed for years. - Rx;ctina `-ingle family rn iden •al to Govth . ^rnSC lath Strnnt, n *fin aunt is a_ proposed apartlnent nroject (Fredericks Dev. Co. _.To the north is existing agricultural with planned Foothill Freeway right -of -way approximately 150' north of boundary.To the east is existi.11o Churnh and •ra ranl• l :....i Is the pr.cject, Z-iart of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individunii small, LI-AY as a whole_ have significant Cnvironmental impact? No. WILL THIS PROJECT: YES r o x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ x Z. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? x 3_ Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police:, fire, water, sewage, etc.): X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? .c 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? Approx. 91 x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: i41 chance from R- 7 -850oT to R -1 - "s wFich would conform to proposed general plan designation of medium density of 5 -14 /Acre. - (.5)- �S.li�1��s7ner c;rn�. o -ova aI2PSS'.. 37 ., �1vn s o h removed f,�om . east windbreak, 25 Pomengranates, A nrox. 22 overaged Acacia (Dense) and mist. orange,3 palms onsite and 4 palms within St. iiwy. R/W will be removed. IMPO RT ?.'^, If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infornintion required for this initial evaluation to the best of ray ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my Rnowledcre and belief. I further understand that addi.tioncal information may 1?c requircu to be submitted before n aucauate evaulation can be made by the Dwrin�,nrnt Review �Committee. Date '7y%�7 Signatur W _ - -, Title Oaaaci.� �• I.,t w0 ►...a t yy� r,1.7 ` MS1DEU'_ TAT, C0i:5T11.t=j014 The fol.lotirind information should be provided to the Ci.ty of nalicl,o Cac::rnong., Planning Division in order to aid ill assessing theility of the school district 'co acco, odate the proposes residential development, .Name of Developer and Tentative Tract 1Jo:: Jent. Tr.611180 AL HOUSING CORP. _ Specific Location of Project: North side of 19th, ea -St bf Pan! e ifx;E�-�deu} PF}ASE I PTIASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE / 7OPla>, I:u.- cigar of single - family units: - - - - 2:w -giber of multiple _ family units: 24 _ 24 24 72 ate proposed to egir, construccion: 7/82 11/82 3/83 Earliest date of _ occupancy: 11/82 r 3/83 7/83 •Idodel 4 and t of Tentative Bedrooms Price Rance S� .793 Sq. Ft. 1 BR 78,000 82,680 81,640 1131 Sq_ Ft. ' 1 BR 85,000 90,100 95,500 1379 Sq_ it 2 BR Iii•. 93,000 98.580 10a _ an0 RESOL: 'N NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCb. "•CAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING Al ' %AL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -01 REQU' 1NG A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -1 -8500 TG :.- 3 /P.D. FOR 5.71 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET A RAMONA AVENUE - APN 202- 171 -42. WHEREAS, on the 25th day of April, 1981, an application was filed and accep_ed on the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 23th day of October, 1981, the Planning Com- mission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding prop- erties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on October 28, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga' here- by recommends approval on the 28th day of October, 1981, Planned Development No. 81 -01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City ^ouncil approve and adopt Planned Development No. 81.01. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resocuti.on and re- lated material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded tc the City Council. Resolution No. Page 2 All conditions of approval applicable to Tentative Tract No. 11853 :;hall apply to this Planned Devel- opment. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THF. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: ecretary of the P anning Commission 1, JACK I.W4, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of October, 1981, by the following vote - to-wi t: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAt�'IING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11853 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 1.1853, hereinafter "Nap" submitted by American National Housing Corporation, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential development of 72 Condominium.dwellines on 5.71 acres of land, located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona Avenue - APN 202 - 171 -42 into 5 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 28, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11853 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of devel- opment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their 'iabitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. Page 2 (9) That this project wiII not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11853, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The design and material of the patio 19th Street shall be restricted to a of 5 feet from the finished grade of pad. The design of the fences shall to the approval of the Planning Divi issuance of building permits. fences along maximum height the building be subject lion, prior to 2. The landscape treatment along 19th Street shall be improved to incorporate mounding which steps up to an low profile natural rock walls, as a means to soften the grade difference between the street and the building pad elevations. Details shall be in- cluded in the final landscape plans. 3. The Eucalyptus trees on the east oroperty line shall��,/ be replaced 15' on center with a species of eucalyp- tus tree compatible with residential land use. 4. The continuous interior pedestrian circulation system shall be improved with additional texturized cross- walks at key locations and at the main entrance to the project. 5. The meandering sidewalk along 19th Street shall maintain a distance of 2' from the curb, except at the drive approach. 6. A directory shall be placed at the entrance to the project subject to Planning Division approval. 7. All ground floor units shall have a contiguous 225 square feet of patio area. ENGINEERING DIVISION 8. Revision or reconstruction of intersection drain at Ramona and 19th Street shall be done per Cal Trans standards and policies. 9. Vacation of Ramona Avenue north of 19th Street shall be accomplished prior to recordation. 40 Resolution rlo. Page 3 10. Flood protection wall shall be installed al.ono east property line to protect structures from overflow Of Alta Loma Channel. 11. A joint use driveway agreement shall be made with adjacent property owner to the west. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTErT: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, .JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of October, 1981, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES. COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ,'ti 11 I t ' N0. • N 9 ` ^ — u•y- p'1 N V V u L dN r°r• ✓'��L b UC v .O rn�' C 4 n 4 —✓ 1 a/ V L - .n V r a O ` N V A c ur i — 1 t. V �.• N NVV • V V u C V' A •-• O c 4 Lr N N tl L ✓ i ui V �N NT° Ld V✓ � _ 9 N.n V 6LLN > O dWK G•= T« LrT — L� n' !•i d O V C •. Y L O SI V 1 L N 6 1> rL• j N N V Uy O b A C P C • • •Vtr — C ' � v N Y L C ✓r � ty .•w N q C_ 9 •ow 4 6' 1'. Y C L r� NV ✓ ° V ^ m^ r OV ^44✓iN yr c uV•`�'; vrn_ N i ° O 7„ v •fw L^ v� C G «10. L_ •ay J •N.. y N. y N L rw 9✓ N d L N V u rr O ^ � —^ NrlT6 � ^.w. NLtN6 VO : •.� N L N f. ,. OJO« f tC m O V Ll 9c'.L C O C V�rLJ uG G N p L _ Jr� q r✓ N ''.a.'u LJC •w~V�� r. ^..... .. �'o' ii ✓O• c c � _P T 'a •✓ N V V ,t r, N V 'n rU O U. i r,t V 1- •� V q L [ w h ✓ V C V i V •� r i.� ut n V .r .r p ^. L L y N �. V' O. O ✓ 'J y IJ N N n. r u y rrr G. � nJ ii u' r ^- �a U ✓. � u « 4 d 1 w t1° j` •y w ✓ A _ N 4 +Y- ° O Y Slr +J G •� L u LJ L 4r U R`n li 'r V> V} u✓ C C } .r i • V � � F� b 1: N rp- M` J V rcV1 A 6 G C i III � yaV �° N� G L V c �l V ct „ V 1 wt T O Pr O N.w- W � i W i N• V `1V � 4 at ^ N rri L E 0 0 N . r �•O ^� V OL N V'�• O °�G 4 N VL— w- L +w✓•V� y L .-. L O.aJ u• l" 4 iN N« Y n to O L✓ ✓ V w G N— V L J C 1,. rLV }. N+ Lm Y� ly n r � ✓lV>. - Y•l uT Y✓CO JC >•u ^N.�� u � 6C � - rJ ` O'uMp NC'«^ wta °cw�p -N iI YO.. Vr — qp 'Wr' +a N C y L L J -`�•' N N 1co r.wC.VL� 4 V V O 1 N: �� W N a^ V p •V {. u tr L u u u c b N H u u4 ✓tt °'� v ^i u[T.- mG. �n.a �.°-✓ a L � +-� 4 crL C L O✓ .^cW° 9 V O C i;tu � L � o.`.. °�✓ ^- N 9 L O p « C' �•� V V U 4 1.'-a. It N V� V V f L 0. T• f' '( 4 L) V C U V l d Q. y O p r " V W v. 6 O Y C V L vu �V uu cY Vu) )✓ �f1 .uSN rVi. c�.N O•^NyftV .La � ✓c ` i. p� > >LN of Poi` `m « ^ L� ✓or '' ✓: NvdL cu °^ °NV ° L1 ^ v ^p °• wtn Tt.'LP w.1.Y � °:n C = vt up ✓ u:u 1.. u ;rtd L.V «N✓q N� N «✓v ° �' V ti a n �. O v i rP.r a.G. r i i n: Y rF.1 wN- �« N L cr N t o a yV-. ti° t Lf/ L N a• w — y. wrLL �W NYfw «L: •r I�LU4r•N !CO O � V ^ « cat 4 .-. •° a � � r Y 9 ._ C V ✓=i u V >w— O V� G rJi• � O q J V d q T WE At w' N 6 V✓ ur ^ P U jjj Q 4 N N n •mot N N L L 4 >• q C ^ V �J `V` W_ N` ✓ ^V q T G V L qr it dA' Y Y V^ ✓6 YNN C N 14. N „t. Ni. O N { r n� 5� ^N .O r' ✓' is T- t°G � .^- � i � -•' •co° G y W V _ Y N C O L N \j 'n� a• C O Lpl ♦C ✓ C J T L `y ty N NL •'a It [1 N 4 v O` V p_ yr 4°. � r" Yr..� N 4 N �° d p V: O q v 1,,, � L N L V L > ^.t• y N � d 0 O` V O t0 l d O G 7 r✓'n G fJ ° b N V Y O y4 V C" G d t/ N Y O 4 i d M ^ ^q L ur ti Z q fy, 9' — 1° q V • ✓ ^ y , y W "' V rn U q N >� u N Y u 0 9 V C L C 4 p ut 9✓ 14 y,,. J w- ✓ U C'^ OC r uV A •OnV �Nj YN .Jw zIVL ° YN _ OPN � N °V6 �rOir ° VVG > O �✓ _ _w L > 2r°o vw~ ua l: •u ✓ ✓ T Y p qU Nd uL OL NVN +NO p� 4N rOir d O 1 L 9 VM �� A COC ^� V✓•w N pl N > =.T.` u O`_ .} V [1 T v. N J wL't^ C 6 O L N N \_ •^ O V•w•NL � q 1 M « V d✓ C T Y .7 y q O S 92 V� V V —2 O h ^y •� w l' q ]•Y p •� O ° �� N V 'a � + U n' L G> h L ar ..- r' d u V �f 9 Y 1_ r •�� 7 ... c P Y« ✓� >N i it d `tn`u✓ .. FY °oo i o rp •Lir N✓ v y.✓ c V I � :. V ,V, [' N q✓ O L /° q^ w L ') N ✓r N V C V l � �+� v n V q 2` O 6N N a n>1 If 4L CL- Jr 64N J•.0 n 6 �Y wd� ^ �✓•� OL CN Y.'^« dNM1 °N wV C � C� 'a 1 O } 0 N✓Pi V • L wCt 6 ^ d N O. N 6 E ^ fy O � p ^ •• � � Y' 1� T•� C 0. .� ar SW T O N N L „ C C L✓ C V C u u 'a e" V N 1 C ° LV.n G 'r'W pN dN� d F ^.w. F! ✓Lp L W V�S VV L „N OV� C•wN• YILh G _ J � •� N ° °^{4 CY ' �N -V°C d l� O� N �✓ N N N„ 00. —... -Y °•^�° V «m r y O q0. G �"•T VN= CY- Wy NN d•' ✓L l V f.L O =. C•wq N N..} O « �✓]M > O r°/CY p� L { � 'V^ C>)r°i°�1 vW 1qL LOrM L ?rgit q� 'J w yrq ::� c.NL L wY� .V. N a: •°V ai .r d- w_ M >` i W!J NL .-::A .°-i ^ • L t/tN VI— 4Na.� Y�� rfi FYN Q4 4+G-9 t\rw IL.V u:•VJ QGN•Fir CM HuL « •• C C w.. a d N o •.. �S V � Y M �'� � f�1�v11 O N t0 Ot � •\/ -r'� � •� wCV `V/•1� VN N `�M-f11 \ \� 1 /�� < L I t n�4 e ' t d Or M i u uL I4: ^Ir w N c L 7 4 u r u b V 'L'Ly"O.ny r L 4 G L LOCy C4rifA - J N a o V J _ M V O G u G u O V L yi A v „4� L u 4 N uYJ L W ° d U LL OL u _ N rO��SUp L IL •r 4 _ ✓ u i V(Y� L- / C u 1� w ° C oil ° Y ^�z 4 dvn C v4AL'nV q N 1 L O C 4 j V V w"N i'r•• ,- ur_uL°l ,•L_„�cc•`_ p._ A L T V C' 4 L' N C� .� U C U 1, ✓ - p C _O N u1 u L YG VIT Oi YC�'`u ° I - V C j 4 Y L n m •� L r ^ w • V oy ^o ^ ._ V N .A Y u 1 _. N •_ V V C c1�^ u q G C D T U a y t N r' a � q ✓ L N /'J y. V .r N r• Y�•r � ^ 01LL y AC NO ice.°. W ^N WJNL•�yN `.m� CV .N NCO a.r rr L/ uAUUp rr .f ... ./LL �`L H E L awl d' •^ d u G y u ^(_N OLL dN L�r'�Jw ;U IYIN C• V i.� N .. . 9 O u C V \. P•.C. f C. u a 4� 4 ih ¢V rOrp ;N4�[jA O_0. cL G V L a N t0 i Eta a .a u IN q uY m L q a C .J ._ a._O ON _lW Ui.W U.JG Ca C L YCI 64 9' us 1-.N 04 NI rnl • N� 1 Q O w C iN NNO. ._CVC.Ti 7 •_ C V J � L N u Z4 u O V a _u «^ ^rte j 1J Ir c m C A C V rh 2l �c fio y CLy 4 u m Nub n L ^ � ^ � u CrN pV/ 1 Y'GU ecc � v a a O A 2r u N L u" 0 ^ d ^ V N� NN 1� ou N L `o l _ 1 t C L. T M � o rn y L: r C vv ^I' 6 ai V_ G V O V a r L O 4 b t� V q u rr W R ¢ L u r a7 r v b i d J y of ou nG ° u f^ w u L G O C L fi y W O C L O v ua e L_ r/ a „ d y a N Ncfaa Ego: L c u W G u i Q N W LL l ^/C•I f''pi y L EI 4 > Abud L y L nu . N u 0a L u Y ^ y1q iu�: y O L L �11I„1j p V �IV u w J `v }I N p L b v "ei Z9 u � C• L N L 4 GL N b ^�Y u«v NL 0 O ° lh V V c .- 1 u tl d o N N u q aGi T + N Hsu V l i rry G N .} I I e T t V Or n a 1• u uL I4: ^Ir w c L 4 u r u b V 'L'Ly"O.ny r L 4 y LOCy C4rifA a V J 4 l M V O G u G u O V L yi A v „4� L u 4 N uYJ L W ° d U LL OL J _ N rO��SUp L IL •r 4 ✓ u i V(Y� L- / u 1� w ° L ° Y ^�z 4 dvn u v4AL'nV q N 1 L O C 4 j V V w"N i'r•• ,- ur_uL°l ,•L_„�cc•`_ p._ A L T V C' 4 L' N C� .� U C U 1, ✓ C 4 N p _O N u1 u L YG VIT Oi YC�'`u ���� y M V C LL^ n m •� L r ^ w • V oy ^o ^ ._ V N .A Y u 1 _. N •_ V V C c1�^ u q G C D T U a y t N r' a � q W V N r• Y�•r � ^ 01LL AC NO OVrr\ vL C iN NNO. ._CVC.Ti 7 •_ C V J � L N u Z4 u O V a _u «^ ^rte j 1J Ir c m C A C V rh 2l �c fio y CLy 4 u m Nub n L ^ � ^ � u CrN pV/ 1 Y'GU ecc � v a a O A 2r u N L u" 0 ^ d ^ V N� NN 1� ou N L `o l _ 1 t C L. T M � o rn y L: r C vv ^I' 6 ai V_ G V O V a r L O 4 b t� V q u rr W R ¢ L u r a7 r v b i d J y of ou nG ° u f^ w u L G O C L fi y W O C L O v ua e L_ r/ a „ d y a N Ncfaa Ego: L c u W G u i Q N W LL l ^/C•I f''pi y L EI 4 > Abud L y L nu . N u 0a L u Y ^ y1q iu�: y O L L �11I„1j p V �IV u w J `v }I N p L b v "ei Z9 u � C• L N L 4 GL N b ^�Y u«v NL 0 O ° lh V V c .- 1 u tl d o N N u q aGi T + N Hsu V l i rry G N .} I I v e T t V < L Or n a 1• u k L I4: ^Ir w iN^ Yf`p` 4 u r u b V 'L'Ly"O.ny uUNG LOCy C4rifA V J M N u v I yi C_ u „4� L ° V a L uYJ L W V W LL OL J _ N rO��SUp L IL •r 4 ✓ u i V(Y� L- / u 1� ° (L ILL +C N dvn u v4AL'nV N 1 L O C 4 j V V w"N i'r•• ,- ur_uL°l ,•L_„�cc•`_ p._ v T V < L Or „4� L ° 1!Lr/I Fo ..iLCU C•_N N w"N i'r•• ,- ur_uL°l ,•L_„�cc•`_ p._ A L T V C' 4 L' N C� .� U C U 1, ✓ C 4 N p _O N u1 ^OUd VN YG VIT Oi YC�'`u ���� yV L oy ^o over- rov•O'/ oob c V V C c1�^ t N r' N aN d C._ j�L •Y ..1 AC NO OVrr\ vL ^N WJNL•�yN `.m� CV .N NCO a.r rr L/ uAUUp rr .f TyN u ^(_N OLL dN L�r'�Jw ;U IYIN C_ i.� N .. l qr 9 O u C V \. P•.C. f C. u a 4� 4 ih ¢V rOrp ;N4�[jA O_0. cL O ti 1 � � C6 j L, E U ' J - W L' i N } V r b UI L ..N. J L � V N C. � rYp• u¢✓ L 7`` L C C 7 ! - N V 4 N P ✓ L N .•w C✓ N • L •- ` V Y J _- " N N r N •n _ > F W ¢ C ry �� d V Aw .r �Gv "4V n� � '�:TYT {'f.A V ✓L �.°N�c •o p\V� _NJ No u•'�.: .wit � 4 ^uo U. N!1 •• •Y J m � ✓ V� .� .l N U S � G L C C J � L y ` V_° C y �' � 1? v Y'VLL ✓(-� -J `c 7l L O• .nY [] ?yY. Cb-]VW w.l N u ` ttl N Y "✓ .- V N ..0. � V Y. a� ^ .. C L .. N' u ° y u. U y .n y N C C V '^" In �� L ` � IJ •. L L N -• u. �� P � L✓ J• i- u 4 CL� u Y ,°ua ..`_ '•) L 4V V.n AOJ V .Y LNY ld, Yud NNT L w.� _VL ^N�V.r ° 'v V N i2 TT4 V L Lf 4 C 4✓ i L L L L ✓` ) v :J �' N �.' .w°. 1f%2 ✓ ^• �� •D n O A ODUyIi Lw V� ¢� W pLd W✓ b Y/W b L'r "� 4✓ ! V_ L'. J - ' � C. C � Y l w..Ji l!i VY'r J U m V N 4 � i. 1. V W L V 11 ♦ r 1 l l V .�. _ C _ f. .� 9 N aVlV�w ¢A� - W _ f. ._ J � 1 C LJ• -•'� •n n L� •`•n q \. ii�r ._ n y V a•V C L..n.- L. {_VL✓ , n ✓L'-W b N V `.LLAy V u Ou 7YN V• 4. ^J 'U W � � V .� •.. 'd mP� 'cV4 u O G. l n.�•Vi u G' C 1 yV.OGN b C f_� ✓ ` V 4 � P Vnd L V6 VA u J> ✓a N iI ( u �'C^V 4uV EW�W.� N-� u u � OY' >bY. � (r f i � '• t U +- 'I L L N V u W L C •VT Y••Y " ^i• c P c ••r A rn V �+ V 'a O C v� t N m N d ¢ O• C L¢b V� F c.'A.. N. b 6': V i C N V V 1 u C✓ N ... V „._ ) A N iwJ ✓ ^V .\ N u:. J M..V V u N .-• ��° ^� ` O !. l V \` � N P O' G L L' N Y C✓ O b F_ `. d N 4 ^L' ^C.._ N •Cil N v A t CVO' i3O N� ` `.V. �._q yCY O. �qY� V u V (' V �•.. .-._ � l ✓ u O•n� u N u TJY' L •`� f. Cr •n L 4 NA4 'W� ✓' Y •a N LL (.. v Y. ✓r.n✓ ✓�'y on Lr N ¢ �J 'y�� t c � V• ^' � �:Y✓ 4u V >•t �L 4 NV ✓p V�VY• V V•n L4 �NU -o 4VVO e�dNd✓ .°.'N (! <•� ^e✓ �L N W ^` Ld lal' � •_ n 1. •a -1; ^ .WJi :3 c N ✓u�i NU r: VL C. � Y -YUM V'wJU T` N.�! I q uY• 1'u..>. GtCNJ O t1 ` M w V V 4' .n L\ V. N O F n[ 1 ✓ nr (Y. L N C L W � ` I �" u u V' a V V_ � q i d!• V V P V Y ya' V✓� I C O �J (Vi V •¢^ n• H P I L wf ( Ll .) V u C )' O U \n C \. d ... b V✓ .J V LL "'- f � ✓ "� �:'w..w V W G ✓ T .0 V Y b ` n: ^ ` u V. d O C ,. + a i '. V L L N° W y t L4 �') o c✓ CJ NCy O� � 1YJ{ V �• G L b A O. C C •^N?N u � Lcb c. ., .+ wJ ..- •. v c a' o._ =_ L •° dC• . N u ^n.; 4}^ •.. .V✓ i y V I L. V ^ y Y dV^ •CV l - N J •'N'V N✓ Y �/ V u _ V C N _] Y 'i d✓ ._ rn � N °�`_„ o is .v °1. u L A'm ai ^ V °.�N �(i W f -. V •°` o=n` u a dv.-'� VN� .jL •!.N u'y'•.. ✓• L W L t Y'L`•`f VOU .✓y I. u•v IN ruy L''CC O L ✓ N�v' •"• fn jf l4� l` r O 6 nW 60VY� N vd CLL N1. L' ` NL... [�� (J 41•j H l: _Y ' '_ ¢LV (� P� 0 N 434 N � •d•• •u• L� u N `N 1•I OI M1 I•4l Y N O� 4 d T V O � U 'U' � L V •.O V L N V. N •� 1,r d w •L �y+ V °NYT �, �.• +C Odd F .:: 4 O "V °/�y�f. ANT d4 !� NLU'1 N CUq VI N .� ^ Y u ✓ > N A �l V V Y V l'1 „� � •yi• .L•I b y '`• u i„ a 4� u✓ N A _ N�✓ v' l a n V f�' L �. a..�`� u a• C• N °"io fJ N V J ! ii n�'. a.Tlcrn �N � Yw.4•. nnL ��v._jJ'� LL .°.�L i'N v � •n N'�N 1_C "` f\✓ Yn�U ✓ r-...N duH �b LU.✓ A,.� WL :.d \`.li adi �N Y 1 l-1 w• l Lq N _.u.- ✓ •u JU i^ 'a Y NVV'l4 ^� E �V � L� u nl N�•✓ 3: C N V � ¢ 9 u ✓ 11 wl F- � � 1 .� N ` t ✓ \.._ A nr � ^ N V •n q W A b fl Yl V O. > L L P N N q .- = . I � C• V O 9 � y PAC L V Y. u•��Lr 4,Y-C 4 P•� w- W N 1� V•N •Vi• \O. \rV N� ✓ f T.. ii 4 \,b •U-LN `°`YU wl V N '� O WJ•n O nl - .� sY •rn^ � •J✓ �OV •n \"OOd TVI U. u•O V� M. CA F..n 1 .. P. l: Pu rnC ? f: V wL CYJ .. .. -'>•V ��/�• C'mW CO iJ LC vUU KV� C�•.n O ✓uu NIF hle } •u vL6 N. a ICY bA N Y \r N..- 4m OL J b U'\ yN VN . � ry �'� L¢n n.✓w. tU (il w. y a •�i• 2 •LV r K O N i V cj • •a ° e1 Y' � C C) O Cl •✓n V 4 A c (i V✓ OI 121 /I s U W L' i N } V r b UI L ..N. J L � V N C. � rYp• u¢✓ 7`` L C C 7 ! - N V N m P T A N • L •- ` V Y J _- " N N r (b-. Yi •� > F W ¢ C ry ^' L V r V ^JV U•�O�CV "4V n� � '�:TYT �n i�..(3a V ✓L �.°N�c •o p\V� _NJ No u•'�.: .wit riuw S ^uo �pQ v. -u• �. m ✓ V� .� .l N U S � G L C V' v •J tM1 J � L y 4. t. V_° C y �' � 1? v Y'VLL ✓(-� -J `c O .nY [] ?yY. Cb-]VW w.l N u._ ttl N Y L .- V ..0. � V Y. a� ^ .. C L .. N' u ° y u. U y .n 4'� �] V '^ y '^" '✓^ ✓ o \l v n � ^,.- ` � IJ •. L ^,•• . ` P N .T." L LVYL� w.._y W E .. .`d .N. Cy i- lW,. CL� u Y ,°ua ..`_ '•) L 4V V.n AOJ V .Y `C Nw.' Yud NNT L w.� _VL ^N�V.r ° 'v ✓ N i2 TT4 V L Lf 4 C 4✓ i L L L L ✓` ) v :J �' N �.' .w°. 1f%2 1 N U ^• �� •D O A ODUyIi V N1{f{'.Jl. V� ¢� W pLd W✓ b Y/W b R_ ., w � ✓� C ✓ I pJU N i '^ V V W '' . •r G W w V L n N � N( V✓ L N _N T O r •`°W . l V N N C Y, N V C N f .� 9 N aVlV�w ¢A� - u('CO. ��NY J O. W da, VS• 1 C LJ• -•'� •n n L� •`•n q \. ii�r �_ y V a•V C L..n.- L. {_VL✓ , n ✓L'-W b N V `.LLAy V u Ou 7YN V• 4. ^J 'U W V .� •.. mP� V 6 u O G. W i Y C 1 d� w O' 4C'7 C• OdANb4 b C f_� ✓ ` V L^ P r .O •L L LL VA u- VA 4T ✓a N d �'C^V 4uV EW�W.� {u t'u u u .-G.N OV J� >bY. N�•L� (r ^AC �C N.- WY 1M LILW QO••aV ' i �j N._O ✓O^ L'L1r LL L•-N•V LS�CVVrV cLi✓ 'a Lc u L¢b r '^ c•.(w oiJ c.'A.. b 6': V i C J L O.O N u C✓ N ... V „._ ... v V• C A N iwJ ✓ ^V .\ N u:. J M..V V im; u✓ V V• .-• ��° GL 9 A � x� 4 V U l ^L' ^C.._ N •Cil 'p uN.��¢�_a•'r CVO' i3O N� O �._q yCY O. �qY� V u .n Ay Vi O G✓ f' " L L � C C lO.w". •.. LL ✓ u N ... y V GJ C O O •"- A •`� f. C " N V O l'1 � �• �) � 9 C A N .n ✓ ✓' Y •a N LL n L Cu.°J v Y ¢ �J 'y�� wL' E V V'V V• ^' ^ F 4u V >•t �L 4 NV ✓p V�VY• V V•n O �NU �u 4VVO e�dNd✓ •'- o�-a•N (! <•� ^e✓ �L N W ^` Ld No..> � V V \'V^ n 1. .CN+• -1; ^ .WJi Ln c N ✓u�i NU r: VL C. � Y -YUM V'wJU T` N.�! uY• 1'u..>. GtCNJ ^�C c T NTNO L.-iSj ^�'n O ON L'�^✓ ... L mow. (n =n E V N W u 4 n V V_ � L �- Y ya' V✓� I C O �J N Sl ..C. � V •¢^ n• H L U ^� "'L�Yr N L •n ' y u• t. "���N` n \. L'Y.,L._�Nr�aL:; O• O'er NL W »:. `� °�' �•Y .J ✓ 4V. � ✓ "� �:'w..w � N ¢rnni 9Y. ^r. rJ N s �• nV..••t YLSV Y« .l L.L N d N('`✓ .:� N J u !Y4 y4 Yi Y. ✓ U40N ` ..•.. � ✓l) t L4 �') o c✓ CJ NCy o f iLi -q ... �` v • _ d:JLi •^N?N u � Lcb c. ., .+ wJ ..- •. v c a' o._ =_ L •° .°.�A N: •'.aJ �! � l O u•1 CruV J Y - N Y L V LL •'N'V N✓ Y JA m ^l ✓ `L r L•V uL4O L w•. - u 1 rn � L' b L `� °�`_„ o is °1. f uN _ V^ = e•u �(i W f -. F •°` o=n` oy d.-ar a dv.-'� �L'. F < !: V T V �l °N 1p ✓u La UL t N C C r'. L W L t Y'L`•`f S :� � ••. L N i L C U V L ✓ W 1` •"• fn jf •.p .• V1N r ENO 6 nW 60VY� O.V VYV V• C)V u H l: W 434 N ♦♦ ``�/Wj�1 P Z `N 1•I OI !�I M pVF /y1, 1,r /J•�`16 [LN ee1., : y .. V 7 d V v " 61� ¢Y L „ v• N f V V O PN C •J T V'I J f M W L J � YI Y- ✓ V L N N a= fL � U C f e• O C 6 V v Y P W L d b 4 L W L`V V vv N P L ai V v W wE Y� O� W •J N V ro v M OI d C � R n•rOl V _L N V A G d n� s M .J V. 4 4 n .k 3 V d Y b V O n uM M N N ^ V xc O N O yC V V VI N T N sic d I „b a) N <+f L4 H P O eau i u u a L a O � F c G y G l L ^ N 4 ^u0 v r O N ^ r o u T G^ L i > > 4 4u� a P 4 N d L \. v cr N O V b O N L C ° Yi b Lis m yr W V v. a V =m -0 V r-. r t n` C ti L r u � N � u T rn S W o� S V P L L L a o. 9 91 Mu S Na G V W-0 S. u CI L of ° d u a >c T v w b V y4 s u J � f+� T L_ y Y N Ty L 4 ' W N V C N a L N u u b b u T N C t L Yi 4 L N nn c V N C y l•• n � O T +! v O P V N c YL,a C W L u N r .. r C? d V✓ l• N � u C U. a O � N N W •� .b ^ U d.^: L 1` N C � �' V C S 4 C C' •• C y O y u p > •, u G. Y L b L c b o a y r o W trr L• uL � c�uV M B O LL Lj •� L W C V My L .n i E ♦ V - V L V y y Y• Q •-S. ^ wI p .C- w � u y 4 � � •, h Pn° u O y L yN L ILir W u b1'lY yN 1J V~ V 4L J N V L�r J YI S Y. r> N V v Gnu o Iv v Y^ ,'( ¢ N l 1J - V V N O r V .- ^. rV V O L (CJ W W - T U w C C..- \_ }N iWWU 11 0 N. •\ L ybV, Y �I a P 4 N d L \. v cr N O V b O N L C ° Yi b Lis m yr W V v. a V =m -0 V r-. r t n` C ti L r u � N � u T rn S W o� S V P L L L a o. 9 91 Mu S Na G V W-0 S. u CI L of ° d u a >c T v w b V y4 s u J � f+� T L_ y Y N Ty L 4 ' W N V C N a L N u u b u T .r. 4 wi f, L O V L l l•• n � O T V N ^n C W L u N r ~ C? d V✓ :!I ✓J T [>T U. a I L N C> N •� .b ^ U d.^: L 1` N C � �' V C S 4 C C' •• L T 1'! N W C E YC q C 2 b .�' arcu V L y y v -• L L• ^ c N - l B O LL Lj •� L C V My L .n i E ♦ V - V L P L` p .C- w � o�0 4 � � •, h Pn° •. F W b1'lY yN 1J V~ V 4L J N V L�r J YI S Y. r> N V v Gnu o Iv v Y^ ,'( ¢ r l 1J V V N O u 9 ^. V O L (CJ W W - T U w C C..- L }N iWWU 11 N. •\ L ybV, Ipl �I �G� � � La°. •+tsC U u L� V N -0 L v E N. N N rn� r �r Y u V � F u Cr L' b'.V. �m V U U \Ni0 Lu N iJ 22 u � W � O r U a T v. o c• :L L urrV L TW L > N f >.V ,LI c c.ar J..a ^-0 C U O q N U n a J L .. y > L G W J . L n .ar 4 y l' O rn b C+ ^ L C 6. ny LN 4 r 07 rV r a� V u 0 Ju ink V U v� A d N L C M d > �r Gn U V U r n O -> P ^ L L N jJ V i� u CL n c n^ •. u N q O T J 7 _q V o C W r L L oti �s rn L 4 u L VI V t n W N C Y oL' u u 8� Q' u T .r. W L u N r ~ C? d V✓ :!I ✓J T [>T U. a I L N C> N •� P9, 1` N C N V L4 S 4 C C' •• L T 1'! N W C E YC q C 2 b .�' L u 4 y •- -• L l B O LL Lj y VI My .n i E ♦ V - V L P L` p .C- C 1V .✓ N p its •. F W b -N it O v N Y^ ,'( ¢ l 1J V V N O u 9 ^. V O L (CJ W W - T U w C C..- L }N iWWU 11 N. L ybV, Y. La°. •+tsC 2V V ul�y V✓ n C y � L2 •� °i'T ^V V yV Q �].0 NCU fN uVL V0 l.a'y4C U N V its �LV iJ n .-. n L V LI } T � • O l N y .r-. W N •' u L y �: y 7J \ C GVyOC TrnN lnr buNU � rnq GVS `.- n •• L � T L u u L C' G L p V L r11 J rti � .c'oN w` v`. \ v ) Fbo y " ^mc u�^aL_o `:v _L bi.-C `p ;> •a. a ¢ v L+ m N i c n r " '- I_ v is `c' � ^ _ 'or u NnW ci ;�3 w r �; Nucu ••y Pa$xN NY L -. GL� C p LrLr'•^ •+T1rV L `.r. •. C... K V !L + W u u V ^ N n N V 4 W Q' 4 l `J V CI .n T. V c J•, _ J q ✓ L C Ci ; O c y cuc v. �y 'o o N OTd '•-fuU VCN b J V NNE I r N (.moo g � Nu CICN Jry L �� <1 L. - L C 4 •.. y 4' V ^� L L rnY �L•` V � L q 9 rOr u� JY ¢u b�ueeI� V V u b L� <LI O 9tVJ V Vb _ b C�C'r 1'^ ✓ C > L w V W V � � V V N O lJJd4 uCT i1 m lnyt O N4tr� L` 00� �V C ♦, NV�r Orb JJ� C�u VV tT IYJ ` �• O O y Y V C C ` ,r V�NIOQ NnV � r �CI q N L•.L�O.Ci,L }W QCf VO Gr ` ✓1 O L t= 7 41 iJ `yI vL «4 rn:'a ry >t N L O.r NU ql V ytu .L.O 1'N r`Li t0 61 NM fn lI C'u Cp 4]N iJ N w V c u r- O ✓ ; O c cuc v. �y 'o o N OTd '•-fuU VCN b NNE r N (.moo g � Nu L C 4 •.. y 4' o •.- Qi !i t L V CUt' V � L q C1� rOr u� JY ¢u b C�C'r .0 rN.i Nr w V W i 6 J J V Y L V N4tr� L` 00� �V C ♦, NV�r Orb JJ� C�u VV tT IYJ ` �• O O .� Y V C C - ± u r iJ L vL «4 rn:'a ry >t N L O.r NU ql V ytu .L.O 1'N r`Li � N V 61 NM fn lI C'u Cp 4]N �tV ' 9p•�u �Cq .0 QO. d�HG\'4y1�\`�y'L rC its N \1 /.y.11G 1 tlI � 1 1 11 11 ,,j i CITY OF RANCHO CUCA140NGA STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 28, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lain., AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -15 BECK - The development of a self service car was— h and gas station in the Industrial Park zone on 1.04 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard - APN 209 - 142 -32 ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting review and approval for the develop- ment of a self service car wash and gas station located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard. The facility will include four structures: the service station canopy with cashiers office, wash bays, the detail area, and the trash /storage building. The project has been reviewed by the Design and Development Review Committees and has undergone several revisions to the site plan and elevations. Staff has reviewed the project and has provided Conditions of Approval for your review and corsi- derati on. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval for the development oft of the self service car wash and gas station on 1.04 acres of land at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard. The applicant proposes to construct three semi- Pnclosed canopies totaling 6,294 sq. ft. and one fully enclosed trash and storage building equaling 752 sq. ft. The site is designated on the General Plan and on the Industrial Specific Plan as Industrial Park (Subarea 6). Haven Avenue is designated as a Special Boulevard. The project site is bounded on the north and south sides by vacant land, and on the east by industrial condominiums. The pro- ject site is Imesently vacant and has no significant vegetation. The site is generally Mat with a 3 to 5 foot bank at the west boundary along Haven Avenue. Curb and Gutters exist along Haven Avenue, Jersey Boulevard, and Monroe Court. A 3 foot retaing wall exists along the north property line. ANALYSIS: The project site is adequate in shape and size to accommodate tt e proposed uses as shown on the development plan. As indicated on the site plan, Exhibit A, all building setbacks, lavrdscdped areas, and parki..j arias are being designed in accordance with the Industrial Specific Plan, and other City Sta —lards and Ordinances. The Illustrative Site Plan, as shown on Exhibit B, indicates that the applicant intends to provide mounding and landscaping alon% the entire frontage of Haven Avenue, Jersey Boulevard, and Monroe Court. ITEM E CUP 31 -15 (Staff Report) _2_ 6i October 28,198-1 Two access points are being proposed for the project, orre on Jersey Blvd. with the other on Monroe Court. One -way circulation is proposed with the entrance on Monroe and exit onto Jersey Boulevard. The system was designed to reduce on -site circulation conflicts and provide adequate room for stacking of autos during periods of high use. Curb and gutters exist on all three street frontages ano the applicant will be required to install a meandering sidewalk along Haven and a straight sidzwalk alor� Jersey Blvd. Four parking stalls have been provided adjacent to the trash and storage building. 5 wash bays are provided with the drying and vacuuming of cars to occur in the semi - enclosed detail area. This building provides adequate space for 6 cars. The service station structure will provide 4 lanes. naturl The elevations as shown on Exhibits C,D,and E Indicate the abundant use of wi buildingswill be constructedoOfsco�crete on the blockawith woodcsiding andewr,udrage trim (Ex:iibit F). Undulating turf mounding will abut the Detail Area Building to minimize the visual impact of the long straight facade while trees of an appropriate variety will be used to screen the view of the roof top from Haven Avenue. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan will be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure that these con- ditions are met. A Lien Agreement will be placed on the property for the future construction of a landscaped median on Haven Avenue. The Grading Committee has approved the Conceptual b;-adirg Plan as shown on Exhibit G. This site fails within the flood impact area and is therefore required to provide two settling ponds to handle the runoff until appropriate storm drains are complete. Adequate catch basins and under- sidewazk drains will also be built during the construction of this project for use when the storm drain project is complete. At that time, inlet pipes into the settling ponds will be closed, and ponds may be covered up and reverted to landscaping. The design Of the ponds will be subject to the review of the Planning Division when the landscaping and irrigation oians are approved. The ponds will have a natural rock lining with Pompass Gras;: along the exterior (Exhibit G). They will be designed as an integral part o` the landscaping theme so that the ap- plicant will have the discretion to keep the ponds as a distinctive landscape feature after the storm drain project is complete. Calculations for the exact sizing of the ponds and drainage pipes will be submitted to the Engine- ering Division prior to issuance of Building Permits. The Design Reveiw Committee acid Staff worked with the applicant to formulate the design which is presently before the Planning Commission. The Committee recommends approv =l of the design with the attached Conditions of Approval. • Guy' 81 -15 (Staff Report) -3- October 28, 1981 Part I of the Initial Study, as coenleted by the applicant, is provided for your review and consideration. Staff has cr,;ppleted Part II of the Environmental. Checklist and found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with such findings, then issuance cf a Negative Declaration would be in order. CGRRESPONDENCE: A public hearing notice was advertised in the Daily Report riewspapE- •,,n October 16, 1981, and 9 public hearing notices were sent to surrounding property owners within 309 feet of the project site. To date, no corresoandence has been received against the project:, but two letters have been received in support of the project and are attached for your review. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended Coat the Planning Commi�.�ion consider all imput and material relative to this project. If the `;ommission finds that this proeect is developed in accordance with the adopted Standards and Ordinances and does not adversely affect the adjacent properties, the a motion to approve the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions • would be in order. Respectful iy tu'ij:nitted, � f n All ? tA AJ JACK LAM, AICP, Director of Community Development JL:CJ:cd Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Plan with Vicinity Map Exhibit B - Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit C - Service Statioi, Elevation Exhibit D - Detailed Area Elevation Exhibit E - Wash Base Eievativi Exhibit F - Storege and Sign Elevation Exhibit G - Conceptual Grading Plan, 2 letters from surrounding property owners Part I - Initial Studv Resolution of Approval with Conditions • ,Y„ 7G*+5'ftccT I w I i I QI r y I.4w W M... I I I C r g 5 I 1 , ro. Vj_ I i ww i I €RSEV iil�D. NORTH CITY Cdr, rrEtiT= ��[��'L�1O CL'CA1�4Q�rGA TITLE ,= -� _a►s wrnc i%1r tai riy r�� PLANNING DIVISE'V E .y k 11 CI'A�AI' O RA `rC IC Cv . v UT�1Y10.J�Y'VA PLANNING DIVISION LFOlvO: '/' Cwntu.w.4. • i.W /Ae GwwNr -fo •3- a...o.DrY.L.N- l...y.o. A.Y•.. -.w. -a •9 • C.uq.Y...lip.w.rr' Nu..w. R.crw.. - Q •S -taw Ti.,r - A.pr..s jrua.NS•+ - � •.- 4N:.•Anar -diva Ku.u.. - i� •fl- F...a...w A.I - Rb.n..a HY.r. -t• N.n: 4-_ Si.. Aa W... 5.... N "wwN A.wIaW. +wYN.YwI tM.YYSr.I •1- Gnu. A.r. AML.NL•t A. �.«Y'II.. tIMJNMN'.w.MYyY GYYf.NY11 •L..� I'. JMIN..�Ii.Y.W- •RY.INI Q1N WIfY VV L• iYiw/ XYa.M • .n l ^n• GN «..n.Y - cQt Q IwY. �k.n w. lS..YY.N.e4 •id.( !. /.N.f...N i4o • I.I.Nt.1'%pN� a'I'MtAM` 14.1 �• M.LM1M . ALYY.Y.UYf N.M.N.1 Y 19y1Y•Ih.t Ia+.: AYr. LINYteM~ Aeao. Aw A.. W"c uLrtrY SgyY, 050 AV b IYwriraY �.0 •rlb1w0u.)Zi NORTH ITEIM: T�) TITLE: GXHI[iIT: Y SCALE:-I17S _ V , � � 1 1 _ •� ' /' 1 / r tl � I, 1 •L,l r o.. 1' ,�� ��r: III ! •� .. 1: 1 Y ,�..�, ►.114*. -.■.� �\\\ \\\o\\\\\\\\\\\\ �\\o�,yii�iiiii/ /iiiii�ii� qF�■.`Y1i =, f IIII IlIl Ir INS iI 1IIl IIJI1II`I {I I( Ij`1 I( IIrIr IIj �I 4 W' 7I1�1 t `� +�' t pro MM MINOR ,r�•iX�• lfl�! ��I���I I�II����I �I���u lilll��1�l���l ��l I����i1 ; ► ►I �1�f ��,�����I I��A�1 �1'1� �I��� � ►1�,�► �I ���I� • - -_� r` 1,4�.��i►• af■s � , Al Ia �+� /►. � :1Y'', sw � 5,. .rte ���1�Wi �!i�►fii r 1. F \IiiLJ� ':W1 +i I v, � 1 of-its' � ., q � � �, ''p,Ilii IuIuII IuuIII III If H ► �,�r1► I �ny,�N, ._:; li I ��'1'F. ��II�I,I��Illllll�lllll��lllla, L1II�III�IIIIIII I IIIIIII�IIII I 1 N IIr �'/ � • r '• •1!1 ��: �"•I�Y+�.INr.n1•, MIMIW.rNMN1Y Yr�t z..,r Yom. �.:�:IS �b II1 i, 1 YNinu "ui w 1�4YN MYNM NIII(A WIIIFMYNNY X MII 1� Fgly nNY�I II IIMYNMYwa111nI �uuY�ylg WNn�IYMI � IYq III 1 ' •YM Y1NNWrMIYYY. FIMYYYINI MI7I IW WYMW 1111 IFYNINIWq,lY1N11111 YMN MgW1 Yry11YTN1�11Y y. �. I1I1FhY1. ON YF �— 1 IIYNnI�Y��,�IFy1F1II ,�' YIFIWWM ��:� I '���IIIYFNNYYIN�" NII NIIYy YNIMYW NWIIW � fIF�NII I 1IM F • I� 1 i �1 1� �� ^`I 1 IY� t/ry 4 YI / VF IWIJII141111111 'N� +•,Ii �I g011r1'I�I�.�FFq�I/ YII 41tl11tl � b •"N 411NNIFMYINMY 1W11 MI IWIII1NNYyyYYNN.I 1 MIq 116111\1 N111111N�11 11� "� • _ r � �: � YIIIIMPIWYItl( YYIYIII�IIWy111NYl�yl •4111YI�YWbW_ �11�.. � mu�NUU11WYIn�N'InunNn�l : "ice'. � 1 t 4 �t J. ,f '/' -- WIM,,orlNO/ //. ;rr�rrc � �1 �rl��. �Sil( INA11�InNrrdtiR�t111N10 +dwfyw• + =�� ` AP i�l�ti tt f.� r' ,, B a OF ► 1 RANCHO CUCAMOAN, GA TITLE: EXHIBIT- SCALE: WT> 1 y 1 A w Q z 4 N.0 •O NI�FIytii�Y W4 .11A4LL 4V AwND G+�r• W SIwYe .�Y� �iwr � N Z.ANI/ D'k[ %FAI /Nl OIDDD 34.0 81.0 0 V a Conceptuaf Grading Plan Ur l 0I' 1T EN, - RANG -10 CUCAMON' TGA TITLE, pit, it ,.� ��..r�►J� $ `i PLANNING DmSION EXHIBIT: RICHARD DICK & Assomns 359 SAN MIGUEL DRIVE. SUITE WI NEWPORT BEACH. CALIFORNIA 92660 17191 759,0157 September 18, i�81 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Planning 'Department Re: Lot 3 of Parcel Map loo. 4594 Gentlemen: ® Being the owners of property adjacent to the above referenced lot and having reviewed the proposed improvements as submitted by Mr. Larry Beck, we feel the proje--t is compatible with the area and would urge the cities approval. Si.nceraly, James C. Knight Building Supervisor JCK /rt E RICHARD DICK & ,ASSOCIATES 359 SAN MIOUEL DRIVE. SUITE 201 NEWPORT BEACF! CALIMRNIA 92W (714) MOM October 9, 1981 Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: CUP 8115 Gentlemen: CITY OF RAf;f•!'� CUCG! s( ;a COMMUINI'fY01.t,•p. Op;f!pl DLFI, AID >^a 7 ➢8�9�ID11I�I2�T +�i3�41uI ax We are the owners of all the remaining property and buildings on Monrce Court as well as the west side of Utica Avenue and having reviewed Mr. Larry Beck's plans for a self -serve gas station at the corner of Monroe Court and Jersey Blvd. urge your granting.of the above referenced conditional use permit. Sincerely, �Z °rrr/1 G James C. Knight Project Manager JCK /rt Ll I r-11. M 9 K .:ITT OF MICRO CUCAMONGA INITIP.L STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - Po be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee; $80_00 For all projects requiring environmc-rtal review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department- where the Project application is u«de. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Studs. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The protect will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3' An additional :information _cr,ort should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT ' ITLE: ",!_ p P ; - APPLICANT'S IJAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: ALA/? CGK �4n1 / +r/� / o eft Mn/Vl /a C"�, G<f�iuZpc r NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHG:"E OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CANCERNIDIG THIS PROJECT: '' ,Lj ION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: A\ i •--r- — -r . _ 1 -1 1 .,1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: I L ACREAGE OF' PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING A14D PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF AMY: F EA16i pc•,—_yy 7.57 `nom_ — �1N� /1i'� >� DESCRIBE THE ENVIRON%C - ^7TAL SrTTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCIZ.)ING !MFORMU&TION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PL. ;IGTS (TREES) , ANII -,ALS, ANY CULTURAL, KISTORICAL OR SCZNIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND T:3EIR USE ATTACH NECESSARY SIEETS) • •. - -�� • � cr. ..- �%''E -:aNY, FXr/ -S IIAT //�i. ,r � i � i✓�177�.P.4 � -___P1 ll6.t? Is the project, part of a larger project, one Of a series - of cumulative actions, which although individl.ally small, may as a whole have :-ignificant environmental impact? I- 2 L WILL TI3IS PR JJECT: Y—F NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contoars? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? y3- Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general Plan designations'l 5-- Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the ne;,d for use or disposal of pozentiall� hazardous mater�.als s,,ch as toxic -ub•. snces, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: ,QT "7HG l7 .nT IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the s'= atements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further •xnderstand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date- 6-� 1 ` J ' � / Si� Title ��tsrte�c� 2 - -3 RESIDENTIAL CO`,1STP,UCTION, The following infornation should be nrovided *co the Planning Divisior. City of Rancho Cucamonga in school district to order to aid in assessin the accommodate the proposed residential devef:)pment. Plane of Deve?.oP�r and Tentative Tract No..:_ Specific Locatio:i of Project: PA,1Si I PI9ASE 2 P:,ASE 3 PHASF 4 TOi T .,L of single — family units: i. Nur:Ier of Malt =rile family units: 3. Date proposed to becir, rcnstruction: . 4- Earliest date o° !• ;odel and ° of Tentative 5. IIed_oo:1s Price Rance 1 RESOLUT1014 NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -15 FOR SERVICE STOP LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND JERSEY BOULEVARD IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 9th day of September, 1981, a complete appiicat- m was filed by Larry Beck for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of October, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consi0t, the above- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved zs follows: `_.ECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed us(. is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes cf the zone in which the use is proposed; end, Is 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public ho.alth, safety, or welfare, or materially in- jurious zo properties or improvements is the vicinit.i. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the 6n ironment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on October 2.8, 1981. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -15 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The design of the settling ponds shall be subject to Planning Division approval pricr to issuance of building permits. 2. Turf berming shall abut the Detail Area buildiF.y, and an appropriate species of trees shall be used on Haven Avenue to screen the roof, subject to Planning Division approval. Details shall be included on landscape plans. W Resolution No. Page 2 3. All wash water from the car -wash shall be collected into catch basins under the canopy and severed to the satisfaction of the Cucamonga County Water District, and Chino Basin Municipal Water District requirements. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucemonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Co— mission held on the 28th day of October, 1981, by the following vote- to-;-Ii t: AYLS: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: is U1 e .� V 1 G = � � ul Y O L � ` 4 N g q G n p A q ^� .• N .° G a L J 9 V C V L u •• A C V C V T V "" G M 1 u' Li 0 C✓ I1 1. b •. W •^ U 4 W -. D ° pbV. ^ N q ` C V ^ u N C [> �J -Vi 4 _• \°. uC L Y N u � N GV Vr•0i LL•_ �41 L VC Or y N q V N Y L V G N w. ✓._ \. if q. L Y W u N G u V .� 6 4 u• d r✓ ✓ 4 4 P �: l C� O N ^ G Y V � '. L L� N P O V ... N L 4 16 L 9 V ._ O i V :wi L •Lj q y 7 C� �•• _ O Q C A L N •. u C O a1 V V W_ G~ L L •_ v �+ Y ^ .�'.• N V r ^' -n b F 4 Cl . J ° N y^ V N N C u (� u d A N^ �' T V G O• V 0 1 ^ V ] •°• u ±1 O N E N L p O. T u Y q� N W y ° ^� � L N N52 LLL V u C� O V N W 2 y P O M P O N � W �I u i Y L' U �• •� u• u� NVC l .� .f°.. {q� CO ` CL C NLL bpiH q Y__ OAL VG FOL riT L �C 6C Ny o\y •Na V'y oNOi 4 V.. •bvu Y\Vi aN O Lu mSb V"wV.+cv G= lP V VN L NJ jy N � mr l"2V.w >qC Nd r(yq pV�J�p. V� OY V� GG L LY P�YW uC VLL LiV ^Ai ^VI CO ^ �y�� qU _W C W C ... q C O b CJ C u b N N N ^ E" 1. N •J r N Vi �G �1 T V uL lrjW (l { °1� w"Ofyu4 Lqq .Ln i. OOY N`yCV n� u.. V D•y Tb C„ N' > SL .NnyCrt� N gV..f_T>° .nY (�On .y B YV�VV� Yj S N.O Oq bV �J V Nei C Od Y VO 'JG qy y�^ YL 4mu NUJ fVJ VV•°.. Vi> C p.M +•y _ yV VU v `VL ]b_ Ni CC N�6Wr✓ b u LA Y r.0 Gp y>NNi O•^ALd9 =I Yq O • [t ^•, Li Jq iL,V V wT� w� 9 d iJ ^^ W V`V�yy [ u y U V g g V yNy U p 1U...wGw Y N Y q N u u jJ Y L +J LLy\ 6V N6 4.A VO N Qu°i W•�LZ Y-Z \JY J�YAyL �ry NSL +-•u [4 >G.I V]:�q U KO i p O i y> 0 0 1• H 9 V j V LL o O L N C] wt •1 t 'I V O C O L .p �JI O 6 ✓ 1p/ O 4 A L q 9 N N 9 .V.. ✓ nb � 1 Y ✓N O Zy Y v n� mq u Gi>r lb =W ` p y W ^ V Y •W C N L T 01 K O V ^ 2.- V. -. 114 G• n TI N p O N •.• q •.•. N C V V ' V ✓ ^ V •^ Y ^ V C L N 9 C III G S L N C uG P C ... N L N C m Q y '^ N♦ b •� 4 N V G Y d 14 8.:� Q 9 O ✓� L i 9 G O � L O Y Y L L ej .°. p p— v O 1 1 i[ V P IS rV l' y yT' N N ti `• C 9 T q q c i °u C 4.2 d G Z VY Na FN I°L \ G r0 q M � u a ✓ ✓y u4 Y4l Cb� N O Vl •�- „U q 10 C �j r NC p cb .. V Y umc° pp (py aY t H L .p ✓ 1p/ O 4 A L q 9 N N 9 .V.. ✓ ✓N O Zy Y v n� =V Gi>r lb =W ` p y W ^ V Y •W C N L T 01 V O V 1'l Y V. -. G• n V O N L O N •.• q •.•. N C N L V T� ✓ ^ V •^ Y ^ V C C u 9 C III G S L N C uG P C ... N L N C y '^ a •� N V G Y d 14 8.:� ✓� L i 9 G O � L O Y Y L L ej .°. p O i[ p N IS yT' N �u u `• q c 9 a.^ C 4.2 d G Z VY 'nV FN I°L G r0 q M 2V NCG. ✓y u4 Y4l Cb� Qu � u.Nir „U q 10 �j r NC p cb .. umc° ✓ `� = .`. .i, o •ca : V u o W u Y ^ N N ^ 4 9 fI N= VL' Oq COG .�•' q C4 u N P V ._ G l G OY PC YO 6 Z2 J 6^ 6 ro N T O V> C V •n• d i q N V I N l l T i I^ L _ '1 � k Yq t o G^e ° ✓ c'• � q is b✓ n� �n f'Y N N a> �..� � °19.. i cs .•oY x� �� � cam• ^u .� VNC `.W..° o c co 4 N N C v 4' C• N C W d G C i' ✓ V u u u N N •V 6 C LO•� N L ` d 00 V qtN L >• 8 V ^y l YUr y✓ y7_ LNN N 'VU W =L0 [:„ 4 V? ✓I � _ Tn- V q O �+�"' SILO .N.. --jr C_b r.^ II O•V Uu._ N` O`•� °� V`� pZl Nb vmc nc4 >: icY o'J "'" o.:i° °a"i a c✓ q._ ur_ n$ 'c .°I. ooio v� N ^� �o`.� u'O ui. .._.^ • �i -n q(W '!•_ N O�NIj 4✓Y 1'. d' F LL'L F` >N S4 Q•.G -N ZZ H -. Q� � N n � ...•° p Gc ._ r � r, " ° •,, _c N o. •W. y '•- y 'L' .°. L .. _ .L", .°. ^, _ ': I°. r.r.k r u 6 V 'e •�WW V fT �..� V n J U � C �� G O V .^ ...'urn � > l�L y `r .� .• y L' !� O f+ _ G CI J < r jVO •` L C O U d L_ p. A u <r ¢ Ord U N N en [J 1 Lj L r y� YcL ^ ^p C'V •Or O V NV '__V_ _ y 4rYL Uuq C .� {� •.. n V F' N L f y u I N .^ I� L 4 rn :� u •NO 3 .^w `r0 No O = c `v Y� m Y r�i wq O F9} d 9V^O•" C "N •LJI C. 4 P. ^l n. Or m�u�rnV n l L 0 v (J ••i f v u % .� Sr +J O q •r0. 0 .`•rL O w ^ ^ N fJ d' �� W J 'O LL J P "• ` C N u � 7 r• u V .� u u• 4 C G C L U i 't V u v n 1 V u n C j' u V ., try N Yy l iJ L V P V u G N Y.�i u Nip: -° i L N N N .pc Y or n W cor o n Go- Fz:zc C w^ yN L gi d .+ .� T N 9 '�. yaT O uVC aGi Lu ur V yQwi uF: R j L W nL NN.. i.`ly V L n V .� L u rn .^ � N � �y � d '^ —_ nw4'. o �v �� w w ri.J � � i n i� •° h a, < ^ r. I'.' �= Y N CrL ` n OC' O w '0 41 L'4 DLO NN L L OFU� V �'4 _m `ry P 4o•:r N� .. wi A j iv P i - _: N : fLJN a. o. � r°.r o ai.._ c N.'n o w � > a ri '.' ^ a : r « �i .^ r '• o « � s � ( u u i N _ Y ^ ^o �r^n •`W c`a5q N�u �c °`' .. aE .- o<�-rc YLy��o L.. n' q�ai a — r.«. .c.o �. u.^ C M ./ C ^= « O N N N C c L .' u ti 4 O L u c V L� . V ..V.. • O ti P [1 V it 4 r`• Y. N W C v ,•yU . N Py 0. C C Y n r^'J V I w _O Vp 4 •V. O L u J L / A N y2 rC4• V r. O I T� 6 _ ^r O ^ N �CYa C6a {L•n ^A U6 ON CCU IL.j� FL.aC '�V � ^O ?�uyy•O I \yl � N°i� I � u� •I N( �I �I �I o AI W _ - c oL `L v �$ N ^° ° o Cr �pL roP O ppLi ]'diOT O _TV L L� w Y VL r —ir•LN CN q ^liL` y_O MO U ON4L .-r [:u `dy L P.. •Jma N, ..r m.o. No': a` Nrr P uc °._ �v wL i js. q .G- w rYir v L '^ O..L. G L a N S •-O. ` c 0 O ^ `y N W O.r• 9 L y ry � C ftj •r0. G S P l r� N 4 V L y V N V y W 4 qLV O n Vl ^AN �C •rfwq .�'6 •.. ..0 � � _P •C,i^JGr u ^l •.yam 4' ♦' W � V n _LNO '� ^_ 6gOVNr•O.. M�� O A 2:V Wu ULV TVN �4 V N W _ N V •� « V - O V V� w O _V VVu N� d.•C a41r :C5, y 'J ti... E CNL p C� _ P u `y ^.. ra ^ NCU� C ^WO 9nl L TIrV �L1 C V•l �`.L {j! .°: w • ^q 4 v s �l „ ^ ii ° . G �; c L M y :,` o rd 'r u P LO U Y qCC 4 G LY iG V. N INLILN O O dN ' • CnLL .� ��_� L_ B FV v Q � uVgP 4•N fONy 00. NdN Sr, « VLUfO.r -'�Or WV L3 N V C N^ C 9 ry „ L T V� V L W L C u n C C~ Cr V pL• A )� d q N � `q. CN Ot L N 4r YCCL 'Y yc; C d I`•n OqV TO.n • Vi L w u V, r. .i', r•. n a C u Y rdir [\ � W C N C 1 4 V .••• � 4 L V L y �' A y 4 C ^ �Lj j u N d d ao Yo A(T �`qw LO uO •.. PcVVr Gq V '_ lUrl uu V V' d d.0 ^ OuV Vr� «q A O� C r„ V.ci .Or Ntf � Lp x .i i � �WI A d �-• N V N 6cr a) A rui.N vrat ..P.o rL L1P f`INU P;�y NT SCI. 'r Or��''L JCSr LLy rLeV °I +'N" a o c [e'^ .y. `'iy i•L. J••L. uL0 ti4�N LrVjl 1i •«a r.••Vrr e.V 4r pVq` V�= qN L.•C n ryV •�6 d VLO q` PJ L 091. ^LAO '.r .- ,� EGUN VL `�NULgC Lpu-° y - C.r i; OYr d ?-i r^ w a NO1 A.osr Wi Laa q�qn G .�'". 4c° i..n Vpoi rn Tn =.°. .N. ro co _ NR m v .p.. o•.rr u.M '^ cr r�-NNU o` - W v..._ nw rdfr N..�,,,o.ca r� �r_<„ r1ir rrr.VGN•O• V, Cfr ^L yyP `E W•.004 ^NUq rp wi O Or yi L^ i V I N O it wS..V. M: > -N'�1• i�F T' A� « «��. n.p0 Ny.'cir. ovla AfJ «uLnr !'1y; .:: -y yr �.�L 7V 2 TUN O Cc yNt C V` \•nLr.. 7N «r0 J'J rr L ;.IVN =..rC Vun ^L ` N y jJ PmO6 • i]L' A V c \ �V CVwu•L.0 5 F. t01 V v L .� L O •� Y C u Or'i Nrr u l rAY N V N b' Sr r^ir L IJ C 4 T_ r %•.] < OIL 4 Q G .L -•irpr .QYL� OT j�••N•F.q VAS `y,L.ld CCU pU ^ ^` .N. T4Njy +�GJ �^' NU C ld WWVPUUO NrVOVN ON^ M ^`�?J �ts� n�'E iir •+ O QP4 ri _ OrN •1L06w. �v 10 1 11 N0 �r� LL GO L V� ✓ •. N V u V u• O Y N q „T' Y �° V yl P w- � ^ L .: y y` N 'J' W y N P. tJJ .� y y J� V V 4 -W L w. - pv` 4 ay. tNn L ° <��� � I � • ,J dvi y ✓ -' V o< � L ✓� U C] \.N✓TL G u .^o`_i W ` I _c, V .. Y✓ oL ?, '� C a✓ F ,. ,O A n V V: � 6 n V I O t. L C L W 6 V a ✓ '' C L v ^_ Cam• V C. n 3 M - n m _ ^ P 1� 4 L L V ° n C V L i w •v 4. c' C c IJ p u [ ^ i ^ ` V nJi N ( J V W - P \ n L u C V !. O n N V- `L L 'Jrt O L O v' - -L u I n P f L✓ y b v n, ✓ u °` .ni. T• N N [C u N L L W A L ° L' c c� .`- L[f` •. Ldc �n� q4 0{_ .. u�L• `% �+ -o m ,n 1 ✓ q L fLT '-• `, u 1: n '� n V A n 1'u 4 A It NW :n V N 4 q O t ✓ c S 4 L• u 'u � L V ?i P S U N C' �:1 i p� O °' L V v _T Y •.- VO C P ^ .�cI l S n V '� l 'n W N V p 4 n• v V C u u O p CJ � u Y. l u V nl �• f n ^< l YL� LL pi uN\_ V �N of u •.°. V� ✓ A� 4N ✓ �VC � `NU pGp� n1A rt•n a•"' N ^qV •L° GV W 44w. ^ n`o •L. �. °O .; ✓ Y Lw�vLL ��" nnL.y � ` `. — — `�$ c isi r' o ._ ^ V r- 9 m.. . o ✓ ..� o � m N n ✓ :v � .c.'• ., rt� i ` N o L o: m Y \LJ \Wi n - l T ^� N v C C O U L V U ✓% d w 0 n ^ a o O c N `a ✓ � i✓ •^ gNr ro ... oL .`:y� N C G.JN -"� �.' '� °' - =^ o � cL'•,N'. wui.�6 Nv N L�N.d .W}n 'p ..� ' NCB '�• ° d v:nu�'a n..N. '^„i✓ ua• ai N yN � vvu � L i Nv A ^ ^✓NN• _ ¢AZ n °.°.� oL m✓✓ Ao. -L'^ >u YL WI v d .L'_ � `•� n" mNV aJ N __ cv �u;✓ Pow ..°.�L CyL Tu ai� 'a. Jam. ^c nw°_ d o u w °` yl Q u ° cvu _no -"n. L n' A ✓ A`.' C u �'- b - p � N.o L .`- L_ \ r' Cn i L .- v l uO N .°. •Li• UN A A 'Lrd O � S� .� '�qT n N •. �' ni fP ON O L E P: C �n L:1V 1. °:\rG \Ln,.- O O.n W N L ^ I i • \-V V.^ `V U✓ V S y.. 0. 6iv O...L^ g`w Q V •V •" n U I ° d✓• n ^ N y N q� V O N u^ O d .-. V N N O L (J - L. .^ .O C NO hCld L �c ° u �o C �'°•� ^� ..G.Gf J iV° O✓ Q V L C1'JY.Lif .°-V� q ^•r y-a NL V N 'L O JJ 4 LL r. 6 \O O L b A •O N^ C C :Ui• A °:'j n V A J O L �• ^)' ` 6 n I: WU.V 6N 6A It ra •O• � V 6 N R V✓ •I ^I bl �n rV�/ V'1Vj G I � ® M v _ N CN u V f: O V. n C •n O O G 6 V A P m � C` ✓ 4 u • CO. C .J L .` I N l V 0/ O V' O^ C O 6 V q .L. ✓ �. ° •^ i'^ It ✓ a .4 J p >\ LNdN n 6 It .O.V � a yY V�°V OC d uLL LC ^.0 «� n✓ C .- L w- u O L u• J l W G 'L• 'b^ f. ^ W N ..AiG A V^ N .� 9V V J = _ O r<�LN u R.NU L>+•O L.W .... V L C.9 T_ SP �`�NYn -.,C V °'N9V W_ r uuo It WIC LnC• -- "N L._ __ ^- 9.. L�VT^ ✓. V '� U Y .. N l C F W �' '•' N°• •- - P^ V Ll'- L ^ .ai U 7 O n U 9 6 l Li L: - .� V AVVVT }rJ N LV ✓ Op✓ Outi T O' 'n >•y A � ..n. L •VqV °° -� C .� u d° y k d^ N ti ti• V`^ q � V J•.6 V V O • l C+ .Ln C °Cun <Ly ✓O 6L'}'V yb LdE qIV � ' _ Vd6 NO w O O 09 L✓ « .C• QV F n L r C✓ 4 � C N d u V 9 :✓if V ° V V ✓ w C W✓ y 7 •_° � O V V R •-- u « tni` } N v y w b C u YaJ/ C •.• N f `C } l q u• N a:. N q wl.' 6. •✓n `I P b N d U V -• _� O N V ✓` u 9^ u d W L !n, V ' J 6 L U l Y S �: C} [y y 9 y. C u V Y V-J G V V y p V L J`OL OC n•O f U� r•tL�L: O�w.V a W V NTN Lr� �JJbdLL u�NO n w. ? «N ..•^' YA t7.COC �:O 9V•n - OCti ]•• N ALU° p- a «a L`c�d+- E v. �u v•-NO �' o._Ln G✓ 00 }9V m N Lu O n .n V•� NJ( w T`� '-n0 .�} � U ._J9 y V �a Y. �• '� W 13 ^�^ p u 6✓ L W n= >. .� F la l V O u d N l' V.� NU�C•b y� p •� yV O"9 n A CJ ✓ OJ N C.- -•C VI]•..L•V OLU p 9N1C1 L U+ U Y69 u L•r�q IC W L O_:u9 ✓_ L Y' 4 y�R EN 9 NT `J 6 •j ^) N U V u N O y {' ..0. :;. u i l _ �✓ L u u r N �. •.. •� N.� U .^ V Y y .. ^` L y - �. v d ....� 6 n ... LOS: u C�Lw L pp^ .. N P O N ° d 4 O C✓ U -I.J. G �^ 9 Y •� G l' •_ C OL m} GN C O V -L q9•J .-.L bCd Au V ' 1 G •r L�u'Jyy LL �.Vi OLUN Q V 7A 'rC rtl wU •.. U •^ •^_-•9 .J Le VONn N.- O O 4✓ ° O r V fi v V >✓u O O a: ° � C 9 F .� _ L L .-. i W u> � VV^ n � F.' u_ L W^ a9 ✓JyE O 1[ .l \• N C � A �✓ n� '^` LN N C.� 1 Wu ✓� N• ^✓W - n� OC >�nW F�(ip [° °O?� ... u+ ^� _•� y GJ ^',']� ^NU0 ^._q�r 6N Aq N...N 0. == TLa9 -... .• 1J p c.qr C✓ d It y•C4S� n ✓��_� n`.: L. u c. .in L'.uw.� -oho.. .N.� % }✓j O c u p n d > u wC V A d w N V (� ✓ u 4 « -' V b It I d✓ N lnJi C .G..+ 7 _ �' L. "' O ✓ C tJ f. °id..'_'Id C✓ C v 4 . J r l i N [' It V- ✓ e li c N n � .v. aJ ;': i� °°`= ` o L ^'-" V l .nip •°. ° A A r! >0:O 3 ru In O Z w^ Y u u. _ VL F•r�3 r�✓r N CJ �-�q0 F, 4NNw. pCdd.• 791]CJ LW adl. 4v 9LV u Z. ...60 ✓?I OIt C _. aa• N Q >y dV WI°r v W C NI .' 1z f! P U �I •OI • 1 I I f� ^I ^I N� �I �!' + V 4 N 1 /'I I p. 1 y, ~ OL V •. L` G wY, G V L C 2!' fr..}- � V V` V TL 1, N •• u ti" •° q d L N y C' �L) r r° ? C V ✓ `� L .�. ° Pi � � V N r.r - � •- w a d � L A` O T Y ar y f V rn ( c c'V V u L = T O G o q V.-i n � N url •J L U. Y, O W •O N y° L. ^ T Y. V t'J C r i u rJ ✓ •- Lar ^ —Wn ou O• C ✓✓i i> C ) v ° L N �) ' i .Ce i '^ u W °i GI rr: .`Ui L N nL }. •NO A V Vv = °•L w) °N G i A Vv lA O J iN LiuN ° 6A G LPO C./y yV °� .-• °« U,�LL N.irL 'J YVq. uN rV Or S 4 V V S r .0 y � O• A - O O` V O U qP L u N G N= rll •'" V ~ ° •- V u .0 aY N SC N Jr < N •.G. QI d Y u aNiN n V L Z« N N c m v ou � w � V 4 � L AL u q b 1I > I L V" 4 N N ^ �iy P } V ° D V O •O „ W 20 �v •G u .L.. V �- O I u T (' I T l 's ryMMM,... n IL v V 1�111/ - � L O . �V /t }y V x { N .J1 • rD• 1 l • N 4T� l l YY rn � W M V L N L n L _V 0 ^J U r� :i W b V N n4 uq •- c r (\ � 1n Y d nj �m D P V u N v r� u W L d 7 Jv A q N D V u W� V O i v O }. U� q y ^• O c V w M1r N L v .- �:3 ii ' a u• V C N l ° U ry u R 'I /I C N •, _ C K -b� u r V G C V L C V• l r• �.v « Gj' C V. L CI 4 q O O n ,f d y N- y N >. •n '^'^• W L M y L V N var rw - P N O VI v r- c V G Nv3 wn °„ L W C V b �cn PC i r^ Y N 4 0 S_ > u L 1 ✓ nJ u L 0 D Y. `• K � .L C V V y V ^J wf NC•+ c f T 6 N O •'J L C A •� ..0. t; L °•a Ica cu rn cciw :,W 1- No _ •• 2 W ? P v P L T v_- G•^ - W ... V - 1•• C ` yT V L N tr u ryU L 11 c p ^ Y •^ I.V n4L ryp .. 00 c< I`u7�c Y O N >. A Q O d •n ? 2 W V (i L T- �' L r VqO q � PEq'u NV .N y(n r LY N -' CL `D b •P. L J'u - )J^ ul <a.r aaN� P° NuV r`•4 uN Nb CN L VOC Y..q. •^-0 N V C L C 1 N V Y V e \VyI l� u aNiN n V L Z« N N c m v ou � w � V 4 � L AL u q b 1I > I L V" 4 N N ^ �iy P } V ° D V O •O „ W 20 �v •G u .L.. V �- O I u T (' I T l 's ryMMM,... n IL v V 1�111/ - � L O . �V /t }y V x { N .J1 • rD• 1 l • N 4T� l l YY rn � W M V L N L n L _V 0 ^J U r� :i W b V N n4 uq •- c r (\ � 1n Y d nj �m D P V u N v r� u W L d 7 Jv A q N D V u W� V O i v O }. U� q y ^• O c V w M1r N L v .- �:3 ii ' a u• V C N l ° U ry u R 'I /I 11 C N •, _ O K -b� L C Oqu N� r• Gj' rV y P O p• O n ,f SN'. .J N- u.. G P '^'^• W y u u N M y L V N N O VI r- c V G ll rYir Y. U` L C ^l` 1_ L W C V N •O Y N 4 0 S_ > u L 1 ✓ nJ u L 0 D Y. `• K � .L C V V y V ^J wf NC•+ f T 6 N O •'J L C A •� ..0. t; L °•a Ica cu rn cciw :,W 1- No _ m ✓ P L T v_- G•^ - W ... V - 1•• C ` yT V L N tr u ^ Y •^ I.V n4L ryp .. 00 c< I`u7�c Y O N >. A Q O d •n ? 2 W V (i L T- �' L r VqO q � PEq'u NV .N y(n r LY -' r_NU inu �: o� rou•= - <a.r aaN� W.L.�.�..r 11 V 6 11 L �« L 0 LO O a IL V 0 T O L O C T U In - ^ O e NLLi N fJ L N� u � PVIO ¢ o Liu � v •11 V n v y _ N -'• N •J� 'O G � p cV�] y 7 V VT (L c O •^ C u c L' u Y G, i y��ii o o u �n 9 V �V i C �i F � c1 •o WN � � J�CSG a +] L N wV •r• •� u f. g •Ji•�u Diu C_ Cun 1j � L N @Y' W c •: y ^ d J Y ..L. q u O Q iY o•f.s a. •N f.�i V C /l V ` u V W V Ll i a �J W yy O O d L C L GI nl N N� f V O• V r•aC "'P u q u �• W O ^q W N IJ •� C Z T C TI n c¢•r w� u�vw i o O« ovY u o.JO -r' Yp `_. ° ,•?o of c 14 C C J N 4 OV Y � O cL V cc z •-_ -c• W O 6 t q L i y o: C O J V GC, L �« L 0 LO O a IL V 0 T O L O C T U In - ^ O e NLLi N fJ L N� u � PVIO ¢ o Liu � •11 V n y n_iv N -'• N •J� 'O G � p cV�] y 7 V VT (L c O •^ C u c Y G, i E 9 V - v �i i � c1 •o .u...^ vG, � � q L N wV •r• •� u f. g •Ji•�u Diu C_ q a atir Q iY � V G• (r W V O' i a N G• ^ ,L V N� f V O• V �`• � n iJ u q u �• W O ^q (ice O N •.4- T V ^' n c¢•r w� u�vw i o „t 7G� OV Y � O � n'G �•L.• -c• PV P N C O J V GC, ��'' � « oW °ii« ao cm•�� 4 N K6 QG. 4•J F.a C� �LL•� N I�1 O 41 b I� %n 11 13 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 28, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, A.ICP, Director of Community Development BY: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11932 - E A custom lot subdivision of 2.7 acres of land into 10 ots in the R -1 zone locatei on the north side of Finch Avenue west of Haven Avenue - AFN 202 - 191 -15 ABSTRACT: The applicant, EJL, is requesting approval of a custom lot subdivision of 10 lots in the R -1 zone. The aoproval of the Tentative Tract Map will also necessitate issuance of a hagative Declaration for the environmental assessment. This project has L ?en reviewed in accor- dance with the Growth Management Ordinance. It has received a point rating in excess of the required threshold, and is therefor? eligible for consideration and approval by the Planning Commission. Staff has prepared a detailed report, related Resolution, and Conditions oF. °.N- proval for your consideration. BACKGROUND: The site is presently undeveloped and contains native scrub vegetation and 6 Eucalyptus trees which are to be preserved where possible. The proposed Foothill Freeway Corridor forms the northern boundary of the project. Highland Avenge is located just north of that. The land to the south has been previously subdivided and developed into single family houses. The balances of the surrounding. area is currently vacant. ANALYSIS: The project is being developed in accordance with the State Sub - ivisior_ Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The General Plan reflects this area as a low density residential area (2-4-.du/ac). The proposed subdivision is designed for a density of approximately three dwelling units per acre. The lots will be sold as custom lots. Access to the subdivision is off of Finch Avenue, north of :4th Street, via Mesada Street and Bandola Street. The right -of -way width for Finch Avenue and Bandola Street shall be 60'. All street improvements shall be installed to City Standards and shall include but not be limited to street lights, sidewalks, curb and gutter, AC pavement and overlay, and landscaped parkway. The preliminary grading and drainage plans have been reviewed by the Grading Committee and have been given conceptual approval. ITEM F TT 11932 -2- October 28, 1981 Please find attached Part I of the Initi -il Study, completed by the applicant, which discusses varinus environmental factors relative to the project. Staff has conducted a field investigation and has com- pleted Part II of the Initial Study which is included in the project file. No adverse impacts on the environment due to this development are anticipated. If the Commission concurs with this determination, recommendation of the Negative Declaration would be appropriate. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing item in a local newspaper of general circulation and notices have been mailed to surrounding property owners within 300'. To date no corres- pondence either for or against this project has been received. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all matters relative to this project. If the Commission concurs with the findings of Staff, adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. Respectfully ubmitted,� c,4vJe.l JACK LAM, AICP, Director of Ccmmunity Development JL:AT:cd Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Resolution Conditions Initial S1 hip, Tentative Map Natural Features Map Conceptual Grading Plan of Approval udy - Part I u •: li 11 to HE , i f-± - -- fi/Y/ 1 J I IN.CYlAY .jaJII �� Ile, �I , : 'i l °_yllp/ —i.1 _ —_ -- �II� /� •11 —�� i� I111(� y �, �� I � w I�llv�') � ._I�� •I I �1 �C�ij .._ G%� NORTH CITY OF ITEM: CSL_ ® RANCI- 0 CL`CANIONGA TITLe: erNAI:Y� ve D ) PLANi�11NG DIVISION EXHIBIT: A• SCALE: JQMUC Pd El Ironic StLripll :mluarc ._.............. -� Nw.o MNLC jFF FI .I-WAY • II11 spa ► n � _A�r.�_. __- � + ---j � , _ —__bn-J w�'_..._�11M1ri�+== .+rt'C_"T ___.._. -- 7. j G=•. -� V Nolr m CITE' OF RANCI -10 CUCAMONGA, TITLE- PLANNING DPI l'1SfUV EXI 'III3IT- ALE: 1 G i.�_— yIi' � ;f •� �(nrrl. ._ _� —! i— �� I •�n- I '���� I Y�i'I' CITY OF RANCHO CL'GNINrIONGA PLANNING DIVISION rY 4 ITEM: E-1 TITLE: M a{-t ll -F'r+ u, c� v EXIII13IT :�'_ SCALE 2 NORTH • wry._ .ice+ _ Ix.1 tp .t.._.y__�.._ .1__.__. :_� ' .L 11 �, ^^`.'. � ___.�_ _�.�.�I tl �� • �.._._ i.�_— yIi' � ;f •� �(nrrl. ._ _� —! i— �� I •�n- I '���� I Y�i'I' CITY OF RANCHO CL'GNINrIONGA PLANNING DIVISION rY 4 ITEM: E-1 TITLE: M a{-t ll -F'r+ u, c� v EXIII13IT :�'_ SCALE 2 NORTH R.cSOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11932 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11932, hereinafter "Map" submitted by E.J.L., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, de- -rihed as APN 202- 191 -15, located or, the north side of Finch Avenue, between 3andola Street and Haven Avenue into 10 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 28, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NON, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings is in regard to Tentative Tract No. 1.1.932 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of devel- opment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with an.y easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 11 Resolution No. Page 2 �p That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11932, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. The existing W dge over the storm channel a...115 Haven Avenue as shown on the tentative magi shall be removed and replaced with a concrete lined channel to the satisfaction of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 2. The existing right -of -way at the northwest corner of the cul -de -sac at Bandole Street shall be vacated to the adjacent property owner. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNI14G COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ® 8Y: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the P arning ommission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of October, 1981, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 v O 4 r� W } TV O 1� u 3 P a o I'> O z v`i 6 0 I b V � � � yb q ^ CLL • N W ✓ L � n u ` ..2a pj 9 1J y) N rJ r C. � u a' 4 n 4 V V �l •J =. N r Y u �4 W ^ V N'u d YC TUL .Yy. �N mT. LO. ✓r 4' ? Urn « 4 Y W W S r V L r rJ N `' ~ _ 4 O 7 Z « L r y �• W lY ._ TJ u' O N _ N � V �. N u LLu l r1 ._ J 6_ - ✓! �: L J A V. [._ T�U r r t. .q ✓n0 l f'pd GuY)✓r A V^ HWD VLL VrV bu r~irN I. ` L ^ C Cr y x 1` «✓ A Cl d ^` u l l' ar Tr « N 4 1u AL U N l li V p M y p ~ (� W i . ^r W C 4 d b P Y✓ l[ IjI '✓ y l : Y, r. Lr ry n •J !f •J ry k N P O L tT L Y IJ u V 1� 4 IU r N .� � Ili u .r[ « " N (p rE� NLL 00 N ti[L ` °r °N<Il 6 V•- r°ukVO.A V Lu d<° 'S^, ✓VI CA tlN L C l T ls� yr r^ S +• N 4r � A^ C k P g q� W G l N i F L L V^ q r S� V^ l' ` C '- Cry .y V r V 4 4 C� L. • _ C L' J V M ° C i VT O:f N yy yW •. =V.l'I CS C. yiy^ r •- N^ SN U� ._VUV NV. h V' w n C V V V � ` N `l u �? L rn O C� LJ u ' V A •• 4" U� 2 G V L l: N ✓� d w� i!l ._t. U u .N. ..' V = \r .. iA +rO VNN JMy N� CN4 V� VVr'J CV .S T_r •� d 7U Vy rf u Lr V cLrOru ^ VY• d °'I O4r V,+ NN ^rtl G/ ; SY yOVn VL tr� N ^Y�'L VL VNC �a4r •2 rYr N6 Yu vV N � CLVyC ✓ Vy ( ^J�u qV NrO dp ttLL L'rpuq N�rLW U� uT G rpir W •.- t• L ti Y W 4 J M✓ g L L f.. W t L ` p N� "' y� V N 4 G ^� m• ^� 4 O V. O fa fI NI \ \Ny' N •f h N 1 j •.• �I ^I I ^I 1 I 1 •I I •� NI J� � NI LL� •� N 11 r1 El r0 c c V N U a p4 ,q ' pyq W N 4 J W O A ^ 11 r1 El r0 W W O A ^ - U •. k t O W V L W O V R•V 7 TJr ^ ✓ C 4 « q ar l • Urr^ ✓ f Y T y LO .V. ✓ V NO V G A L^ G U u .` Lw _ _N V �. L VU P C Ir ^. 'O • V N '✓ ^ ice' N � W Y Ir V N J r Y q c V.L. f �' LL• lr F. O A y UNI ra L w L a1 .r ra LLL 4r'N ur0 r b.L L_l Ly .V tTq y r V LLN 1! N•�rn6 ✓ N u NO fIr i iV N O C' N C V J ✓P T ••' O L l 1 V l N C ur +� aoG Gee Fri Nu✓.� .u^ i✓ N N L L✓ n1 m V N A f yV � q �V LG T9 • u� OUW rOV qN • al'C u r... [rV 8-2 4 V T L r� i k« C r o C N .V fG.r V N N V •Sir V C ° N N �✓ L L N ^ Nov V ^l r•U- V V '00' I1 kN y y iUU f� V'J V T ppII Lr� •V- W T t ? O L N C V� L OJ O4 4 ^I n I irlr LV Vrv. A Pq.• u rY ✓r1�� 4L G NN. L� °�Y O L•_ uSi ar ^ r6 A' r^ •. •rt '^ Sr N+ aLLl r A l L L � Y fJr l Vy V.V� 4✓ � LL LyL �O Vb� v •irn N =c ny ar G.i `m v� ^ ✓_ dr n1Y VtJy A ' 4C `nl Wti uVw S N V >. `t O P V ( rv« O ._. •_ N r y k •rf+i V V Y C rr }✓ L O �> o rlr N W N V°Vr .� j V N f rr c � ^ Ny R'NJ yy W N �r a Q✓r� M4' tiYN .[V rQ •�q G M V Y• G •^ r N � V N _ 4p H yU N K 11 r1 El r0 W W R•V ra_O TJr ^ ✓ LN 4 « q `✓ Urr^ y LO PL V NO A•rL "' t]4 " AVNr Sri «.G. u .` Lw VV.O rp VU ,^ ^. 'O • o '✓ ^ ice' N � W Y Ir V N J r Y q c V.L. f tl �i G LL• "w`iu a1 .r OOU V ur0 r O Y lnu y r V LLN 1! N•�rn6 ✓ N u NO fIr i iV N O C' N .b- J V T ••' O L l 1 V l aoG Gee Fri Nu✓.� .u^ i✓ N N L L✓ n1 m V N A f yV � CO�M N • al'C u r... [rV C L V T L r� i L Rrb N N 4 � s L b G^ f �✓ L b u C Vr N f N N u N d� N l •V- W t ? O L C L OJ O4 �1 1 ^I n I w I 11 r1 El N I ono d � �� = A ✓� L �; V b I C[ 4 4 O O n✓ O D .Ci _ y ✓ is V n �- L C 4 y V ••' 4 u L N .r ^ u y '� u � � � coo` ..: [•']q y I .° y y4 V [• �� `c ^ir_ 1:1.L i, y £�:o ,f:, c� ° F'°y� d ni i ✓1 d fV °n��G NnJ ✓ nFV VV` ✓A \' n V♦Vi' duq I q r u O �•W- V.V [) Y n- �.wuei .C. y`V =c � `ry lir z nUl. ^w. °.[r=.�p>' o c°. °♦ � u� L `o ✓ =: c, c io L tl�� qG� [I ��� uW I C4 Ay !i -%Wj� V•� N �' mc. { O-- ir-u [: V[..[ YO N I9 V l'rn ✓N L Iv�LL ♦♦ >• ) [`•�� ✓Cq•c ?�(. VVO LL �(♦ q N ,(,i VVr In G .� -L n w T 6 L N UI 1w M u G J J L ^ a" N ✓✓ ✓ ✓ Nom~ V,tW. N V D u [f u V 1� i ♦ T) fl V ` L TcJi J M ✓ y' u u ^ L V L � V W v O n V J O pL[ }• O r n'D C mV.n `0' +•L ,n 4u � t' 1- T1 ^ W V l L... ;1 y i 1 1✓ LTV %VT'♦c �o :n u % W � ;'.'_ y A L b '" N c' it ✓ ✓ Y ,. w l�° Y•r.... °.'.n i':: al c ..`. 1 ^�✓ y a: q O !.� [a � .°..- s. V > L..> p I. L ♦' -A G O [.lam •n ` W ✓ ..� 't V > V 6r u 'V;rN Y�L � � N .n A_ N 'A � ` � �� `4� =". IC vL YI � 6L I- V �J G Yuin�d�wl TO VAN °N O. N�L CV ✓Y U�[♦ �V P C LI `L >OI qi"✓ �C T'• ^ I a A C,V � ^rl C LO ',n V t• u i ^wu L4N r VI LV•rn 4VTl0 ✓ l- � V' � r yi 0. ♦'� {C ,,,, F1.n V 3.I 'u •= 4 V ^ C � q G N • y Y. p 1a � I. w__NO n - ••. V ,r. •u CL , ti uJ ✓ A r N y M R u °W Vii r -,' �'° f� ._♦r' °.p- L L'ra°. via sir .i vm [✓rl L ♦O L V� u `✓ � it .� N [L �_' dG rn V ci Lo° s'�`°i� (r N d i ` A' _ -' L Ii ¢ u p: u U L GI ur ¢° ♦'[-- Y V\ 1- `4a T LL j` �+�• d V v i N4 F�NV6 Io W v L Or P W C W P V V 9 �zwo qnA • u •rl[YI •r b O u' ['11 � J L � U• C • •� r _ n I V + [Y r D _ _ t0' u N aGil Y VL - � ,a•u wQN V. u✓ C70 n•W♦ -- vr0. mr JW -.C♦lu V',Jnu'. Y Y ^ �� O.L V� �� w4V WlDV .q+NV u[ N g u` e: ♦ �' l! v° � U V N Z L °� ° � L :� C YI (LLi o .- Pi u q n 2 G .6 d c NP .,.Y.. I-a1 ✓yoo- r° ^V- n.� A vD -- ✓moo Ny�iILNV .. M VT• C'VN `O u d uC {� C m<m „O C6 mt. q � � M1V11 N✓ F' QYCrOfN� dV q [' Wr^if V•°n � �d -°-A W [II ✓ �'. � LNl d or u` >a •• � Y 4 `' V U O � � V✓ O .V C_I V� l L �� ✓ aLn d 6 u •� V 'V S 7 � P u [N ` fi u v ^ b V4W FOV r f. V C V q �♦Y.O y L "-j' C Vr D ud V -d dY. N (J O •n-N `' >. L N r] ^ Y, y •� V urN D o a'N r P V glNy. AN a. < ;.,' i• � YbV=.'y dt� ..LL..] r6 • O �' ,L„ L L .� t-.r r _N •-. ,[, .ulW[T � � ° u•I 'J V P C J L' V'i � Dil °i -Ol l' LL V q C C. // .C-. Il F C L L d ✓ [y q ✓ J L r > L✓ N u � w S b L V ♦O, V � V. .C- � O L ^^ ' [-' 41' V ., (N i (J C L l+ 'V M `[ ! •n 4 d ✓ �i i ur i N' [Wn � l n✓Vr M= u �. + .♦ d p... c D m i1 N✓ -VO [l' qN dV 4LL O N Nd F V L J d V t✓ V' C V _C C u � ♦ ^nCiuu vu U ] C~ � d d !♦V N b mi qU n±i L NlN ^V `nIVD�N CqY pC q [T q [� Y� f_ "r c 1� d ^A.0 [(1 01 u l" N N N .' ✓_ Tn .0 •... f. u 4 6� l .^ q {' V� 'Y N "L U^ ✓ b C CA V v N,> � l: C V r V C S q V q L LJ V; J] V d ✓ ' ° NV'V u d N •v TI d .L.♦ "I 'MU V VI'V W n° V C .n Jy•-L V D V .n } T `•��� PL nVILmW [rnbc YNil Fa4 'q•ib n•C r, bq (t O y Q} YI N O W' V u 6♦=.r C 11 •[J W y _ 0 qV O 121: {1u J O O ry A i' 1�_ q C V V OVi.r � "LVOgV NOD N 4 r v [ ti i nl V L N u l [p c �- .� ♦" N°^ V q a: - V :l Cl L N i (.� at L ,,, N 4 NV VI VV4 W CV YN (I 1V u D N °y1 V_ mqL Lu, v 4L Trn y, DP41p •J6 r'�`♦[ NN ^�� wLV LO `CL! w LL LL 01.•. •� N N N r 7 r U d a • 'J N u) l T N S].•.7 '� m Y jj'' 'n ✓ C d C_ n_ N 2 V� N •V T W .: °¢ •� t°'r Y. .- c q V q -- •O n u Oy � ^a.O VO IUb larva: V uAt11 n ^ •- y W N (. --°N C N q C V 6•-„ N NWL � O °i' NInVL ✓' q L♦'1 M. O V w ql' IL] „: JNL G •V �. d q V r U .� N u •> t tV'1 F N V l' N N U P [O.` [JI Ay •r N LN iJ d [n ✓ P if S V 2 {, ,[11' N •r N W� u N ,,, V f, 4d n C IVOn V b✓ S >�EIU C, V 01 NUS uV R1 VN u yipu ruq ✓A '[•-LC dFNO OLV [1N Dn [r L Oj✓�J`t %tqN j1[ TG O e .u' ' l + ✓ d N° •` Y c 1y T P -. - ty Vnq u R IrV1L 4 �AAA q W N V GI 1'J q 7,� qN i \. 4. V ♦G [LL Cris tats+ � '- wcL T•� y✓ F•✓n ia°i •Va ull w...7r aC WO[♦. Q (ry 4 '♦4.-J.w VSO 1iO�A 4�.- ^u _NICY.. !, 1 -Ya•°• L (y WVV[TYUO NNLIN RNV. 4V ¢Pilo kOYO y4ry KL:06 H� w � to: m oNyv A v N 4 O b - C i T b V�JN ^• PU N l W :1 «� V 2 t •- O L _ V. y•• n V .ten i° .. L O -° G N o W 6 W N u qY s C 4qr 1- oyL O •- C w1 GV n = t) v V l 2= N p K vv r r r u O � Y •li. ` C N ti� u !j N q6 y PN C ^ !1 C uuC {� G � - rEf1 >• °po cr c N \ = C Y G [ O oo P brnn' O l d C 1� W V_ L• O C 2i.[rr�� � V C N u y N u_ V V L u� V V O b r d !n N Q. u 70 L P C o c.• ^ V c u N [nl n vi 010 p• � u u N �� ^ L O V O O U N 1' ... L 1- r m l_ t 'J c O T ry 6 L-u .� �� '•• n� L N N i L� L� n O } V V H u t c y J !a ✓ ry ✓ C O Y O y Y P v> L _ L N L F u u C - O � Z y G l- T C U _ l G W O u� •°- P C` C rVi • L C... N y V y • ^ O ..- •T, O -°. 7 ^ YI � N C N p N« u �.I • l Y• O • \r N LJ y � ^ S: yr a d V. vTi U6 n V N V. ��.0 u °_ � ^.Y`L LPL l C -vV •+ ^y V: �,� r a Y.O. «^ •- � « � Il'�- °• R P� C� l V u •n rn TT1 C••C W L L V > Ou•V bbLm h• 4•�b�l -' 4b Via�V N �° y 4O0 N M Iz ocv a N•V• ocG rJ= m= '_L^cm�'E �«'-sJc O ! ll V •^ d 4 s CA N O f( ...� 1 1 y d �' yN "v °✓� ` uuL —on >`� ac - -° � «c...v Nw -Ory u c' C to �� N l v O N .t✓ u 4 1- ur u• L •e n Y 'ey1N` °_ \.� � fr oc ++ I:L .:o ^_d < N •Y. >� =�+c 1: �nN= c q p^ G C .• L U bo1^ n1 0 _ p •� O u V •..._ ,N.. L..°. ei ` ^� N „ oG O O V L.1..a u, u �ivN- °° •"4 �mv co p1.o �2'; �'V1L a. c _.. •`nv r� .� i�L Nn —?•^NO coc o 27 'c� [ Du_Ctn --rwl. u ON^ A d °u °a 04u NU ^,'nN r�;uuV� _ LL Ou 4�4 :•Vi Or«u n °• 2y� NN °. IW .Vn V•�� AUO ,J„ -fir «V a .+ ti ;'�, a'n« onm yr'Ti L o ., o i.a •.,q N NV?w •^drn °n "2v.w um �a+om °^ �.N. q�L iu°Ib rn\°.i T'�'� 1= °!+•L L4 � nVV ui�LW °i•-L• nb `- .] cctn6 ._u •_V.� _T.�L O 6fdJ �- L'��W > N °Glmp nJ `CY N•�O tl'.)ry CNWI l C°F �p r� CA N QN OY V u\a0 GVI 4m 2bE N \O � It -u.^n ut 4 V 5 4 V 4 O b - C i T b V�JN ^• PU N l W :1 «� V 2 - •- O L V. y•• n V .ten i° .. L O -° G N o W 6 W N u qY s C 4qr 1- oyL O •- C w1 GV n = t) v V l b'nu N p K vv °v r u O � Y •li. ` C N ti� u !j N q6 y PN C ^ !1 C uuC i LL _N a - rEf1 >• °po cr c N \ = G [ O oo L10 nbN T4.`- � brnn' d Y4 v\-N`b c�T L «ta O 2i.[rr�� � V C N u y cs u_ V V L u� V V O b r d !n N Q. u 70 L P C o c.• ^ V c u N [nl n vi 010 � u 0LLC yu VYN �� ^ L V OO O U N 1' Narm_ yN 6 L-u .� �� '•• n� L N N i L� L� n O } N V H O t J O 6 r y !a ✓ ry ry� ry 1 � _ r V ^_•x V7L -_d NCI�N N4lgG - •% l7 L y A k � P od T _ N 1 u s 2 G o a y 1 vy w� O N C �LPh n iG C C h W W y �0 n M n O N �� v Ane9 W y L ` c i u N• u •• b • b l u' CJ O �• N N O b - U_ b V�JN ^• PU l W j V O V. C •n Y- W c W N u qY s C 4qr 1- oyL O •- C w1 GV n = t) v V l b'nu N p K vv °v V p Z L V PN C ^ !1 C uuC i LL _N a - q.' E H c N \ = G [ O oo o < O 2i.[rr�� � V C N u y cs u_ V V L u� V '•'x' y d O b 279 N •r° - N L. C YI V c u N [nl n vi � u 0LLC yu VYN �� ^ L V OO O U N 1' Narm_ yN h O r O O } N V H O t J O 6 r y •C V N T _ N 1 u s 2 G o a y 1 vy w� O N C �LPh n iG C C h W W y �0 n M n O N �� v Ane9 W y L ` c i u N• u •• b • b l u' CJ O �• N N _ b N V V V. C •n C- V •-u c qY M,v C y6 b •L- oyL O tlw1 u M GV n = t) v N l P N p K °v V p Z L V PN C ^ !1 C uuC w +t�LL tL V_yu Pn� - q.' E c N M O � nIV •�.1 aj �o 2i.[rr�� ysLe� acq � T cs u_ V V L u� V '•'x' y d O b 279 N •r° - W C'u V O C N V c N vi � u 0LLC yu VYN �� ^ L OO d N+ yN •u u^ O r .^ � •y^ V N ICgWY �V�. t bV yob y y 4u L1- nL ly •% l7 y u� b v N 1' • C... N y V y ^ YI � N C N p N« u �.I • l Y• O • \r N LJ y � ^ S: yr a d V. vTi n N :a.0 -!yN n V N a Y.O. «^ •- � « � Il'�- °• R P� C� l ZZ L h• 4•�b�l -' 4b Via�V N �° y 4O0 N M Iz f1+1I O Q I N b y u fir •A N w 6 4 d > P y a i br N V �• r WK v � m }C N O 4 L axj c L •r°. V 6 N u. L _ a gift n� •� O C yu VLO � F G N iy .•- c L x Wry n u � L n: o G • W b c r; oL 1 V^ W O ^ d N rGil ^ Y O y t. q n.. °LG V Wi •Y O u M N b N V V V. C •n C- V L N O A - b •L- oyL O tlw1 u M GV n = C > P K °v V p Z L V PN C TGi !1 C d L G,V - 7u r ,n M O � nIV •�.1 aj �o ! c •f u N L N •r° _ x d +.••°. O C N V c Pc vi � u CIG C •b. d yN ^^ u O r .^ � •y^ V d V W N C _ fu q ✓ u C P d « N u No ya d V b ^ TP N > c ' OVA LL) U� b n L V a L ✓ U J T L L 4 L Oi O q L. •-- 4 t5 O u O if 9 Z C V L a Y i C c w G N ^ N 4 •N.• O 'Ty L .L N e d N V Y w •':' Nr cN : c N M1'l n� v�« YOL L C q D C V tr° t L^ L d « ✓n v^ M9 Nb V 6 q Q O w y m O. C u C P O 4 v N i y i V O U U d w" L ,J J. Ci N C c \- u L V V p C . L -co u NJ C V C O V L V N 3 L r CN O N V O u�N ucv N J N U C p r r-u «q O V u ,• O YO T C C •J C v O V. � r O W V > �v L T V A •(�i N q L ^ u (: L C ^ ✓a Y YOB Q 6 N O v� N m 6 N T L u W ni• n. O. L LL W r w C W P U fa N V � N L c .fin V L N d u U d 4'l ` 4 L O t? c N O u N p o�✓ O V ` u V W q 4 O �P L' d i .di L L T C N � 4 � V 6 L V L n ✓ V 2 L = V W •nA�y N V u V V O � V L a' =cA ✓'O _i. d ^ u M ' W :S V N n i ty' V V T O W d 7j ✓ V Q L 4^ N✓ Y.- O W C' U vL E. r � Y C C •s W P n i V � )L C d V W di V O V � l u i q j w .- u p c F C V U V L u �^ C V C r > '^ W Vu A V C U ^ V O N s c lU q J. V ; « N a� ✓ L rn N L ^tU J L ^ V m � Lw 6 Z 7 J V C h V C a 2 N q V L (J L P We L V u N z= r > b u C V V L N P r W V V � 9 � v Du r .P � w a c a W !T - 7 A J C 4 T M V N IQ K N II, SvL o N � m $S u,y V V c �V W t c L_ ai C V L qC u rN y� � U N 6 C� l O•� C C- uy- W ` n O v' ✓ �' qu V C l O Y W C 4 4 Y U • C , �•+ W i W C ^ dy S O r J� 4 2 V (T = i .(._ . d u b V P a $ u W N l U �u � aV V LLL tu°. L `•- T t ^v^ ✓� y=• > N O .. V•n N N° V L O �l \O. n L t. 7 V W LL N r ✓ c ✓ C C .O.• ^i d �. I•V °LUV_ty. N n n✓ `P VW V V✓ 4 L V � N v w C V NW u O m V >. L mG TN P N L u. V •. y y n > L O VL C 1rCy = LL V L V. pL Y N v n NC/ C _ fu q ✓ u C P d « N u No ya d V b ^ TP N > c ' OVA LL) U� b n L V a L ✓ U J T L L 4 L Oi O q L. •-- 4 t5 O u O if 9 Z C V L a Y i C c w G N ^ N 4 •N.• O 'Ty L .L N e d N V Y w •':' Nr cN : c N M1'l n� v�« YOL L C q D C V tr° t L^ L d « ✓n v^ M9 Nb V 6 q Q O w y m O. C u C P O 4 v N i y i V O U U d w" L ,J J. Ci N C c \- u L V V p C . L -co u NJ C V C O V L V N 3 L r CN O N V O u�N ucv N J N U C p r r-u «q O V u ,• O YO T C C •J C v O V. � r O W V > �v L T V A •(�i N q L ^ u (: L C ^ ✓a Y YOB Q 6 N O v� N m 6 N T L u W ni• n. O. L LL W r w C W P U fa N V � N L c .fin V L N d u U d 4'l ` 4 L O t? c N O u N p o�✓ O V ` u V W q 4 O �P L' d i .di L L T C N � 4 � V 6 L V L n ✓ V 2 L = V W •nA�y N V u V V O � V L a' =cA ✓'O _i. d ^ u M ' W :S V N n i ty' V V T O W d 7j ✓ V Q L 4^ N✓ Y.- O W C' U vL E. r � Y C C •s W P n i V � )L C d V W di V O V � l u i q j w .- u p c F C V U V L u �^ C V C r > '^ W Vu A V C U ^ V O N s c lU q J. V ; « N a� ✓ L rn N L ^tU J L ^ V m � Lw 6 Z 7 J V C h V C a 2 N q V L (J L P We L V u N z= r > b u C V V L N P r W V V � 9 � v Du r .P � w D P 0 V L L ✓ M ' L L U A P L r, V N O = U � C� C N CT j .- ^ V r m O _T u� N14 n O C A ✓ i O � �3 D C N L C V L 1/Nj V u ^ i nu La L' O W w V C G r J a c a W !T a y 7 u V J C D P 0 V L L ✓ M ' L L U A P L r, V N O = U � C� C N CT j .- ^ V r m O _T u� N14 n O C A ✓ i O � �3 D C N L C V L 1/Nj V u ^ i nu La L' O W w V C G r J a c a W !T a y 7 u V C M V N IQ K N II, SvL o N � m $S u,y V V c �V W t c V L qC u rN y� � U N 6 C� l O•� C C- uy- W ` n O v' ✓ �' O N V C l O Y W C 4 4 Y U • C , �•+ W i W C ^ dy S O r J� 4 2 V (T = i .(._ . b V P a $ N •u L: tu°. L `•- T t ^v^ ✓� y=• > N O .. V✓ .n y O V✓� V G O i T V T V V V ✓ c ✓ 3 aL �. I•V °LUV_ty. n4Li LC `P VW V V✓ 4 L V � l D P 0 V L L ✓ M ' L L U A P L r, V N O = U � C� C N CT j .- ^ V r m O _T u� N14 n O C A ✓ i O � �3 D C N L C V L 1/Nj V u ^ i nu La L' O W w V C G r J a c a a y N u V C � SvL o ✓V° � m $S u,y c � U N ^ C� l O•� C C- uy- W ` n O O V C l O �•+ W i W 4 \N. ^v^ ✓� v V✓ .n y O V✓� V G O i T V T V V V `P �. I•V °LUV_ty. n4Li LC `P VW y n > L O VL C 1rCy = LL V L V. pL Y N n NC/ � °��• iq of v^ a�� o �.°� cN �� � ^ L tJ N L 4 V! O O •� K V 6 v W r U 4 u C�c M u G O C _ T C f+ N " 3 VY CO Wit= N R „ p G qa5� V V r V y ` y �o P ° V _ L F Y c � C r nY'c„ L W v w_NNL C 1 tl O u P L V r L 3 t LL u n b b � L V T C r 1 y � o q L O N Y w W O mLLs 1 y jy M. QLr /1 -J V L.ub L r^11` V d O Y y LL T L j 4 G �I V V t. Pvl p l V }JI r LI _ \4 tl y C11f LPd Q N L C'r L K L u � � z y O b i U V C •'� ra-au d `�1W L �N• d � u N p :� Crr4 O u O Y U ^ pb Q N yRl Qr n oU uY? L_ p4"�• t L 'a' z =' O ZE TJ m 91 O y° N t;.2 b J P W q u n YL O V y LLtWV LLQ au «LLrnV rrN COL V° pW °°VU 4„ 6TUN IV6 6p LN�>, r�C it •I o LL<b c ° c c 0 y M W _ W N �u W i «`Y S it b Y � u N y W u L „Vr v N M O Y L `Y N tV b O C t y L „ Pn'4 c + _ T _ P C O � L L Ln El E 1, L u � � z y O b i U V C •'� ra-au d `�1W L �N• d � u N p :� Crr4 O u O Y U ^ pb Q N yRl Qr n oU uY? L_ p4"�• t L 'a' z =' O ZE TJ m 91 O y° N t;.2 b J P W q u n YL O V y LLtWV LLQ au «LLrnV rrN COL V° pW °°VU 4„ 6TUN IV6 6p LN�>, r�C it •I o LL<b c ° c c 0 y M W _ W N �u W i «`Y S it b Y � u N y W u L „Vr v N M O Y L `Y N tV b O C t y L „ Pn'4 c + _ T _ P C O � L L Ln El E 1, it •I o LL<b c ° c c 0 y M W _ W N �u W i «`Y S it b Y � u N y W u L „Vr v N M O Y L `Y N tV b O C t y L „ Pn'4 c + _ T _ P C O � L L Ln El E 1, 'Y �J d CITY OF R"k CHO'CUCAMONGA INITIAL, STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this. application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review e,n*_rmittee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard.. The Committee will make one of three determinations= 1) The project i.•ill have no . environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TSTLE: Tentative Tract No. 11932 APPLICAN'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 213/552 -1.444 F,M DEVr"MPMENT CORPORATTWN� 333-S. Beverly Dr.. Beverly Hills, CA 90212 - NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT- E. JERRY LEVITZ, ETL DEVELOPMEMf CORP. 7J3 ,, 333 S. Bever-Ly Dr., Beverly Hills, CA 90212 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) A.P. No. 2.02- ].9 -15 _ North Side Finch Ave. between Bandola St & Haven Ave. LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: %i PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF I ROJECT: 10 Single - Family Residential Units ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 28 Acres DESCRIBE THE ENVIROnlENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (P.TTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Site is vacant-land slopina_at apm.oxlmarely 2% to the south Animal life consists of Rodents and Birds. The-c- is no lnzown cultural. C'historical or scenic value to this property. The site is bounded on the South and West by single- family hrnne^ to the North, Northwest and _ Fast across Haven Avenue is vacant land. Property to the North is proposed freeway right -of -way. 1 Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series'' Of cumulative actions, whidh although individually small, may as a whole have significaiit environmental impact? NO _ I -2 CERTIFICATIOX: I hereby certify that the statements f-urnishe( above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to (be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made I by t l .A�vel pment Review Committee. % Date_ GA Si �1j �,nr �✓ gnature c: Title V , 7T• Z3 WILL THIS PROJECT: C YES 140 Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing v noise or vibration? X 3. Create an substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage-, etc.)': X 4. Create changes in `_he existing zoning or general plan designations? X- ___ 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? i X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any :ES answers above: Eucalyptus Trees approximately 30' West of rSPht. -of -way line along; Haven - IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the , next page. CERTIFICATIOX: I hereby certify that the statements f-urnishe( above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to (be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made I by t l .A�vel pment Review Committee. % Date_ GA Si �1j �,nr �✓ gnature c: Title V , 7T• Z3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION r The following information should be provided to the City of rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order. to aid in assessing the ability of the , school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name Of Developer and Tentative ' Tract No.: FjL DE VFZOPr CO�llg ON: Specific Location of Project: North Sj.de Finch Ave between Bandola St & Haven Ave PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 "— PHASE 4 TOTS A Number of. single family units: 2- Number of multiple family units: Date proposed to begin, construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model and t of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price NOT MNa: ----- ---- -- 10 5 -82 6 -83 0 E 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 28, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP N0. 7000 - DE BOSE A residential subdivision of .54 acres of land into two lots in the R -1 zone located on the south side of 19th Street, east of Jasper Avenue - APN 202 - 024-15 ABSTRACT: The applicant, James DeBose, is requesting approval of a lot split onon .54 acres of land in the R -1 zone. The approval of the parcel map also requires the issuance of a Negative Declaration for the Environ -- mental Assessment. The project has been reviewed in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance. It received a point rating in excess of the required threshold and is, therefore, eligible for consideration and ap- proval by the Planning Commission. Staff has prepared a detailed report, related Resolution, and Conditions of Approval for your consideration. BACKGROUND: The existing parcel was created by the recordation of Parcel Map 5922 on January 30, 1981. The east half of the site has been developed with a two -story single family house. The west half is currently vacant except fora o' high block wall along the north and west boundaries of the parcel. The applicant intends to construct another single family house on the wes half of the site. The site is surrounded with single family lots on all four sides. The area west of Jasper is currently used as agricultural land. ANALYSIS: The project is being developed in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The General Plan designates this area for low density residential (2 -4 du /ac) development. The proposed lot split is in conformance with the maximum allowable density. Access to the site is from Gala Drive. All street improvements for Gala have been installed. Grading of the lot was accomplished during the con- struction of the dwelling on the east half of this parcel. Please find attached Part I of the Initial Study completed by the applicant, which dis- cusses various environmental factors relative to this project. Staff has conducted a field investigation and has completed Part II of the Initial Study, which is included in the project file. No adverse impacts on the environment due to this development are anticipated. If the Commission concurs with this determination, recommendation of a Negative Declaration ITEM r PM 7000 -2- October 28, 1981 would be appropriate. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing item in a'— newspaper of general circulation and notices have been mailed to sur- rounding property owners within 3001. 'lo date, no correspondence either for or against this project has been recieved. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all matters relative to this project. If the Commission concurs with the f-ndings of the Staff, adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions c. Iproval would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, a JACK LAM, AICP, Director Of Community Development JL: AT: cd Attachments: Exhibit A - Tentative Parcel Map Resolution Conditions of Approval Initial Study - Part I L V7 -174 11 YcKe 'Ff.7t:r c3� c h'INETEEN.TH 1Y 0 W Q uorA n,qr Peln11 tw>c.l z Y[Mn wta 11.A1f N 2J Ji Nr V wMtal t >.]00 YV GALA, AV STREET •N w +\..r In pb... O.n.. IIM. In lhV Yttw.c. .nom wnY. KL 111.111M/1.1Y IM! ll\ YW7<OY YIt11/I./RI o>u�4 nnv an wu nvemY. Yu YlYCw4 YY` • >na. OM \lnY .—I A. \.wuaM In WU 11wnw.. � V.tn1 .wlYlw N IMC.I I.O In Wlw M.w... ` •ot;a >wwt 1 1 1 I� w a a .. 1^ M Q CITY or, ITG11: {in rcc l Mr p ), 7 ul RANCHO CZ'G1N'IQNGA TITLE: _ AA Azt je Ma PLANNING DIVISION er.Xlili ;IT _8- SCALE - � � ! rl V NORTH RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7000 HHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 7000, hereinafter "Map" submitted by James DeBose, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as Parcel I of Parcel Map 5922, Parcel Map Book 62/35, located on the South side of 19th Street, east of Jasper Avenue into 2 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action en October 28, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the publi- hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Parcel Map No. 7000 and the Map thereof: (a) The Parcel Map is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the Parcel Map is consistent with all applicable interim and pro- posed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoid- able injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The Parcel Map is not likely t- cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the Parcel Flap will riot conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. ►�1 Resolution No. Page 2 0 tgi EJ That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Parcel Map No. 7000, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the folluwing conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The parkwa- along 19th Street adjacent to parcels I and 2 is to be irrigated and landscaped. Landscape and irrigation plans are to be submitted to the Plan- ning Division for approval prior to final approval of the map and shall be installed or bonded for prior to final map approval. ENGINEERING DIVISION 2. All pertinent conditions of Parcel flap No. 5922 shall also be applicable to this project. 3. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map the appli- cant shall complete a lot line adjustment at the west property line of Parcel i to eliminate the odd shaped piece. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA* BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the P ann-inj Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pissed, and adopted by t:,c Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of October, 1981, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: w 4 v W Ll. O 4- v 6 U c t\ C� Yp L G N -. 1- 4V1 O O N 1 Ni V V n aI w ti .arl g Ol 0 O Y. 'V C •"• L f• n ." Y V Y o y a qw C v C O •' V ` r! `l A W U •n _ � � .cr Y• uv .'• 'n is N... 1: L -V V ' V (' V S y « n i V L V L •O .� is Ac O r .• N U V \: J•L'�a r\ 4 O C r`r J r.• `J f u =y d r Y.jq 7q t)M 4 rc" >C V -' N v N= �I L V 4 U C: .�L. l y� C i-. >. V Y°p •r u n c d A W d L p L V f_ O C' � 'w L L �Na� rfnL ° « N`^•n« ".LrL J C� �. _ I C •rr �� I V p4 � �4 )�4 Uur LCIG ^d VA.•. :O .I W • A V r i OL O r3 J 'Y TJ O O O` N L r rn C Or n.� V1` l V ry•�N ^i q yC L G nt� �V LL ur ti r urT l: LOS N rr 1 V � V y' •n Cr 4 u] tI . Y rN q ,n C y V 4_ v. nl � N N,G AAA �W w«,r� �':Ia � O u• C • V { 11 r w Cl V.,w •nJ t V N -_ = N 4 L•r �� T L fI v✓ IJN C t�^uN N wJ u � p L J t L w� .V ✓WL ' L �r•y•�ru U^ Jr q u V` 4 O i X✓ Y •,r . V y f � h � � n« p d AG •n YI I.VT 'U'4 Li.0 L'y LaJ4 ^ ^ ^ O LW.L .� iinN G why nJP Li �X C w,� :� j V .Y n Y. d -= yu0 "_• � '� ~ b•omiT ° � YV..']f `.vu° «a I`=�.`. rr' f. _� V •r V O p 4 « ' ru ri ^ Y. A j Y IL N W f. rr• .� ` a:. - 1. .Jl "' r, v' N •n "' r y n NL C u 1.« A y' p JIN L.� yP ILfO IjY nXPL N� r ii C N OSa � w�C U^b1 ` ^ O' p �� pu p V r ^ Y O J <. d C d •O, ^. N ^C. ^ N U C •o l a � U ?. VT w v 1- 'JC fJ (" `V'V ^�• AC (C w... nr.._VjU n 4"I 2C mL au 'U CY- LAy ley J W ^w C..O� "' �•N � Tl U'V ,n 'nuyd �C ^VWC iq ^,O Nf�rA1 rnl n`w Anr A.w_ nj V N Ou ^« i� v'an ^1 W'_ f4AVr yl V I I I ! G 1 Ni V V n aI w ti .arl g 1• Ol O Y. 'V C •"• L f• n ." Y V Y y C v C O •' V ` r! `l U •n � ra uv .'• 'n is 1: L -V V ' V (' V S y « n i V L V L •O .� is Ac O r .• N U V \: r\ 4 O C r`r r.• `J f .r •n �I L Y°p •r u n c d A W d L p L V f_ O C' � 'w L L �Na� rfnL ° LO G.u� I C •rr �� I V A O LCIG ^d VA.•. :O .I W • A V r i OL O r3 J 'Y TJ O O O` N L r rn C Or n.� V1` l V ry•�N ^i q yC L G nt� �V LL ur ti urT l: LOS N u •Yr.� °•;': N,G AAA �W w«,r� �':Ia { Cl 4 L•r N fI 1• L Ol f• n ." Y V Y L is 1: L -V V ° is Ac � NAO V \: r\ 4 O C r`r r.• `J f .r •n �I L Y°p ,° a • L c d ^ L �Na� rfnL ° LO G.u� I wl ^I I I L N L +, P 0 � LLO O O r 4 ✓ W L L d •J u U M b � u 9 Y. a 4 IJ I U i ^ •. r y Vr'Y U r IJ t ✓U .� � i 4 I nV -^ wV. y, >✓ `' u L •n O y. -i U � (1 n r r L •J V� C L _ O ^_ V - L N u ,O+ TJ •W- I t _ I L• L _ _ r- V N - O Y .un •• C. •, F U Y L L o •. k �.' J( J .0 a � NW U 14 In _ - i!f .0 L pU VR V'rw 21>V _- C4 ` +vim C (- P I i�P Vr `, -_ d. c,�`i � °v, _ L L7 o it ✓ a� I.r •• � C �µ n L N L Wr �] C C L' • a t i} n I_ O. W^ `A u O N !J n ,,` „tr° �� �v� .n> }�� i ,.o ym •IJ Y W V � 16 JJ `._✓��d.�L Lc i rci -'L r” W Y - `v J✓.r :.` 4 M1 li_ L r '_ -r 4 l N W !J q •J • JE' .u. L M1r N L_! rn n u ._ ~- � �r Tlu �i.0 ✓� \. �V'r - Vi 4 b OY.o'V I.VV U u' C (� _ _ f Ji ' ~ V_ N O � L U J f. u �� ��W rUy r` V W rFi. rFi, Y' LLL l t i.� �� -• �_ i` rnTN ��� a^ W� N f: �� �� ✓ � `tr: .,;VLF :. it v qr uorrr u w �ivL o. c r�° u a ^`u nIL.�Y V '•O O•.✓ -. '.:.F L'9 O: L- ,�V m Ru ^ u Jr �U L _i0 O. (� —I'. LU4 ron. C CV O ��- U,nM L Llu 'n � UI.VV Lr_n 1':: rnnr �^ m � °'- vi. »✓. L i'a ,Jlr m JV .'}+ n• _ .c � -`'yr ..`: � � u.. 4� A :�L: LI-�, r'rl„'_ c J, r;im >.W"�L °. —= o�r•rr .o. r L` N V V u 1• V n u n n- Y 2 ,n u T - Q r, V V 1 i o r •, Ll L L] •Uir 4 A ra( O rL- k u .- ✓r O 4 _I '� rJ k u m y (Ly •lI NI � N •) VI ,(1 N� � ^ W c _ C V 1•L' L N IJ _^ C O rn G C V u p OL -_ ^J Vr C._V V .. :: NU\ O ✓ _ f -LF• u. k L W L � ✓ - J m rn R d p V �.. V C _ C � •• r V. L,V q✓ prn f:4 •O• U. Ln.• � V Ip ^.4`UV t' J V - yr k6L _Y.0 L > Y�r4 p rlr •ir C ..-,1V u4V WTO If nr �,= V` HV Vt- NLrl �L Y PtJF yi =y._T ^JS V L. ^ J N � • ^ V V V N N} C d r N U L i U v 1. V m < O L m � l `_I u ; V cn C 4 a n � ✓ L N .L. (-. 6 q: y (r yr � t O O N V \. J ti, ± .G.. ` rV T'r O j' u V� u L N L~ YI ur U R N- .+u •r C `..- J C uL i 4 u d V `V✓ Va dd.+..'r�> ULY uCL V =� m yl U4 , ✓ 1- r w l Or � .- 4 C C _ fir' J'^ (: ": C �.� C L W r O A V L .L V U� '� C L- y u G Ir �• ^ •, G L V✓ G 1 C u f Vr W V n Y_ tl .°.' ry : :I L y dL �va''✓c` V 4 LW` o� G G V C O, - ^' L n, Y V ay.0 V ._ C �✓ Cr °� „ rnN RL =u✓ _ A Gr =v V of V 1: n R�. r Y it d i;i ^,'¢ Cu4` 8 h ✓L r-OU♦ N tip �. l -L - s V � M (/i TLUJ ✓v n VVbu L p L N V p' Gs N ✓ s [L WVM 1: V NV •- O V k t ; u VPQY- PY -6 V nJ ON ,nV _r 1 - r1. F `J �� 9'G N u. 'O r° � •LItV pCVIU4�0 LCr ti.� -RrUC� TJ:� nrC N V i+ i]. L L" .V -rrLUm C L P� UA rr rV L - � V i 4 r ✓ l Ol u •_ . W f' N u'C U V nL t C T. .> p � Ll•Ji '_ bC C L1: OV'O� 1 O rnl _ > Jf [ L '. ✓- VC G• r\ U V ' V •-. i` O L 9 U U L V rLn V U u V Y n U n V V' tl u.LV.r L r � y' n •J v i. y Y d ^ j. _ f. C ✓ k r. ✓n Our d...� �+ � cU -r WjP nk LJ•L -w.mNy _ d V/ u o .nna �•�r gLVY Cyr C= pV nM'LW. VY 4r rVnu +y Lur LrnU JT.rN (', ,n m dV ^ - N -t nY�i VU Vr ,rl�' •6Vi pLr'Lir- A, \. �Vp✓...rP �-yV. „ �`V•• - V Y C N. ur � +•.` � W N 4 l L� b✓ q m u L A C t C W i i. U✓ -I •' r. d -• f J` C r p c k JYU✓ + N NOL TmTJR VN ✓ k-•�< V M1' WUT U0.V VV uV� >r L: n /\d C. Y- L C JM1•l � •_ L 4 c v ✓ �r �� � y ' C` N P N t: V L r G' u � y Y G] O•� 4 f �J U V� L ur A °r C Or k IUir •� J - L � C N IJ '- V n W^ ur �+ i C O 1p C C p C n� .� rn V� w l <' L •+ a u.' os t ,_ d t l R V .� y L n oe�... O Y s. rn •n U. � N L r ._ -�L •(YJ y V •-'• � �iT ^ r ^^r ✓ _ u � L' V 4l /u�r C a tir 1- Y 4 ]: r U S p LoY. W d P✓ -r O u� N J S .W.�- .. U_ rn C p •n N P 6 V `, 1 N O NI \O I \(y{' \(syI .il iI I I I I YI 1 I 'I Irl I •. .1 V N tom' W t � O G� .. 4'T-J V 4 u VVA✓ lJ'4 l_Vi: PLI Y C' V c � L L N ��i._ dO• n' ' .,• � r..r r n rn �.� i � -LO � r -✓ _ 7 VYJ N N a_ O . .� .. v r - I I - y• ✓ u <. v N r` - y G J O U+ � y O� � u y. ?' t� O V I �� Lf: I O _ _ •_ l.. Vu TV V V n�l u•� ,�'r, _ l_ I cr IFL �1 rV ii � ! � .� n .-�. �J y- �b dV V- � LJ u •UU 'n va✓ o .0 alit T tN 1 d.YUUN r �' F - ,` [- 'N V N � � J.JC - L � L L n yU. " A 1, i L •^ + T t, V .L' T ` Vr V �J G nl as .1 [:l .•. �••. : nUi •.O. .uU -Vr n'V WNW. =Nr.J. L `l `V \r ^_ 6 W OV V ^rU - :•c m t ♦ .. N Y V u __ y L L Or J V -j W 1. N VAN •u � - L.rIC O - _ _ -LVN! •r. - i 1. it i J O N � O✓ u 1 4. �. O C R V W U� U... V O Y . V l'J "� r:.- f .>i > 1 i NON l N C NU LC w _ =. r. r •J �, Lrr r'.L'✓r. uI ` � -« L V V � V 1' LL._ f Lr Vr .'J N '' ` L •,Vi L N C . <n u. n m V ..- > V C: r✓ V L _� L -..-.` _✓ A 1. L u �ntj r W L > y W� V 4 V •V W :<� <�. lT � e a L y. • lJ ✓ V1 •_ L .� n U N V ..- V N N u >• ry V.1. It N 1- -. r-. • - 1..� i ]N L � - L • ^i N✓) N 91 U U N '-' 1. •< nJ ab .r• 4 O Wn �_ _ '.> �JV •; Y- C � 'N u U 1 U V lr lr .J u _NVVVr - u q L r L u� •. t� u� N L� 1r- N u � LL � R rll V •iir VJ J� ^ = J 6 i. V _ n - � u J x u d? G `,V UVC NlV ^ v, �J .PVC W TTU ✓ L c - � + O G � n ul V A N \ l •- <' - C r n U ." <, tT V �. � ._ a SV - ,L^ i � � L 4 V q ✓_ G t � 'J L V ` C � � u "C_Y�Y_._�- .° _. be —c VL =u ✓ *y O.•' `... t-v .L_-: �__ -�64+- � I_J N V['Y � •^ fJ 1. p�1 i_'VVN r-TVT �'_^ -� L l: r• Ii d � Y, � ♦ f _ N tl.�• u uJ ,J U u fi L V Ii W -J V. u _j `: J V L. G•yV y •L.• N W C n u f' t.. V.- V U Gn.„ T^ ..-- 'V L n"V.� _ CV' ,U+ l N T ✓ •'b LU VVruN TJGL Z `•_✓ Vuu ^11...T L- V7 On G.J Cry N` dY N✓ q .-.V 4G YT ' •__ [: u• V NT Nm.JI r N.Ti4 �'' L ••_ j� � r ✓ N 6.Wr2N�0✓ u y l Oy LV 5MN ^U7. yVL VI VL `• C u V w' 0... W u .,1 n L U i c. N O L« A _ t ' u' <. J a L T V d u✓ - w ly N L. _',' L' q N - INC.GUN Nu VN" u ^L NdT .� _ YW-NT _ y n ✓ v ` V 7 V v _✓ al b r-. L N= = ✓LU m W O. 'J C ra 4 N CI U .^ N ` i :. "...- y._rN� 6 - .� mu N� N C L�. 'V �J .- i ✓ V (] ` :�i. U4' N C� l`i u. um._V LL TV VC l'LLb V N - W� V••• _ NuOrGT � '1 O•-w� �J V•.• 4 4VVa' V'^Vrl 'A � 4J VO I4 L U'nVN �' C brnr. •. rL V MO JJ .i cl PM u: .L-. +Nr•J LlN`V • Unr V' NITN y�� uY 'Y S� YdN(V n' G 4 ^� VO CN LN o> >� `o�` $ OILY• V o•` �, LL �� W Tn i:- L •.W. Y� � C<J 6L v L ° — JO• N .a `. .r: � �: ✓�u ,- tVU u�N P =y i 4Pl. rr L 't �' Q'� u�. SO u�>, u� L6C 00 rnV On �.V. �( 4 V � • n u N Vr fJ l �' ^7 �� O l: �AUV Cruirb f✓' V J' •_ L V � f � ,n V "' 1: u v' U .., y u - L V• .� .Ni '. � L tY� T n .p ., V✓ ^ u.L •n n V' l4 4^ ' O ...r nrN _ n r .C.[N _ c % ur�Jb ✓ r_"� nrN - W ^ a�1. ._ nJ: V �- � •t V` �. q - N � r w n Y .�. q aJ._ V V 4 0 0 A U yJi In U. n C m r 1] 4 N �] r.. J L ` f� V -f 4V-'^ N 9 O JU �� C �n N GNU V 'au li C = _S. C IUJ�:•. C CNG _IJN N�NUY V4 '� Utl yV.f _T MV ^J� L - •ru> � LVV 4u N Ou WLI✓ OunN V•a _'z S r•1 - _L N✓nrVlu LuV UVNN ._i V }V.LU� L�C�y W •OiW� ur IY C � .JV Nm ✓9 N_y TCN fu';�w W lyJ._�I -4 m; �"' ONVLV tJ O�4V F M�L_u Vn� VrL UY�i y VNm•• N\ N '+^ i`. N L ='` V, C43 w U�'cm V liy ..._� ✓WC NL NL'_ uNNN N VT �N biv'. •N+ <I b- ~O N C% n _N i. u C] t 9 I Y n L. 4 V I. � M ... ^r` « O N L N G ^` ✓ N,'V Y V m[' W O Lu -N «•S'_ 1- NY �V V L U ••W. O •n iL'a.J y✓ uU, G• LLL V' -7 - nu u?b G✓ lw'N�.m. 1,;A� ✓�. >Vy ac cql� :]- v-'u+ i>to ' u3 L,= «W ivyyn ,Y_ro N lL � _.` ?4�n n � c m oc' iJ.._:. 4.=« l: .`'.I ri t. .n.. -. �'... }. a:. .; •�'• o, n ° a, N' N. • ^ L V N 4 L_� N L U d N J •^ N 4 O V L .- � u 'n V I V V^ 1'. �' C_ L L <• L P L (•� L i O. O N S C. r LLJ]"•l <'' � lU'J Y... Y NV ti C c D. L y r' L U•-4d 0... L�•^.�a L ._r r ✓ G'_ u VJ •.• V�`� �� V L-G � V r P _ ' ✓ •^ .y-• y: j ... u ^ LL ^ r� N O W u r, _ l V N n 1 �. O 4 N Y.. 4 O V L t1NJ L p V l: ✓ u R r I O S •N• C 1 G \• 1.. •I I ^I N� ^I ' I I � I I W 1 W 1l: , ° \ . V « L 9 ^• V f �- 6 q „ P Y V L V L Y ^] w Cr ✓ ur rrr ly W 4 u y •y p. '- q „ (• V L C V L Yr •-- n �. q N rn ti O` V✓ u u C W y� n p `G V• „r is 6 V V •W «2 O = v ^ O N I ~I I C G7 Y Q L C V J tT « N G W d « y q d W d TP W V_N FW r ✓p N P l p ✓ } •r• W O L V. •.. ` TO d L u I C 4 y V n V ••� v n V C C 4 n Ir rn j Y ru � W f G V� c C L N�✓ ]= O 6 NT n c o `] ✓ u EV'.4 p p y G/• 6 i) q1 O M1O .- rr •V � .n^ ur 1' • u N W N N l W u c •O err. N .n. �' .n+ " Pv NG �c •-q cN °.1 v u`. oL..co a JP u i rl- L 1 « i � W « 1' ?I 1,1P` 0 J t i ICJ v P ° n O i n ✓i I Twi- J Y 1 1 v v u u '✓ O c q O r esa `L °io na ✓ic J✓ n I ° - 4 u V V .L n V• V u P I.M1 .G _ u _ u P F ]Z V 2 6 z t ✓ry V V c 4u b Q m ` JtJ VI ooi u o oW ::1L` . 1\J •-GLC ar -`O li �W L• K u M1 + w V\ V r V L V G/ yr •y Y T _ C A C i l tT -. � •^ J y O s •r„ u u V ✓ t• y �.r.� 0.3 nC _ �V C V G C � ry G •J � y V �� v J ._ �nLr � V -L N N C q.- N_ � �Y uW ••� LTV PM L� O? y N q O N ✓_N rn n ✓ �d 4 V'pC° AV u0 yln L CV ° t' 10 _ rOn ID Or \nyI N n W n � 4 A L V 6 N O _ _ rJn V q ✓ V L '-_ V ..°• �." •-vi nr C F_ .^-any _ ^] «q '- C lm... ,- „ P YI i O .G O r •C L N V ur °' 4� .n .�. V ✓ C(u qV° ( W CN M� GAr• lL LVI Oi O t � CW � CO_A L vN uO �� �_•� °u N .•O «rU I „i da OG C `•- V4 q r.. � q\ V L JJ n N •n• :] N d �� V. � !_ °C ..C. C ^✓ J ^ N L V O mr ✓ L W C L� Q W L' _ d n N c Cr > CuV .dru O> iq u °Ir Nd P dJ Vd Y°L Ud_ VOID rU? ud V[� diI °J> >•'t J� - + I I TN J ti O C -J V uW V L > W �• a v LM rn v of J NL „ ^^ C - L G Z� L ¢ W� r P rY ? G 4 N N V C 6 ° V 2 C u p Z ^ O L. 20 �° C ✓ .L.r .W.r c o c r N (1 I 0 i � W « 1' ?I 1,1P` 0 i ICJ v i r i n ✓i r Twi- J Y 1 1 v v u u c r esa `L °io na ✓ic n TcLC••" .L n V• u P I.M1 .G _ V F ]Z V 2 6 z t ✓ry V V c 4u b Q m ` JtJ VI ooi u o oW ::1L` . 1\J •-GLC ar -`O li �W L• K u M1 u �VOVL w V\ V r V M 0 i � L « i n �. u... i r i n ✓i S Twi- J Y 1 v u u c esa `L °io na ✓ic n TcLC••" .L n V• u P r L _ F ]Z V u nl VVI2C z t ✓ry V V c 4u ooi u o oW ::1L` . 1\J •-GLC ar -`O li �W L• K N nl u �VOVL V r V u P ✓ t• NI V �.r.� 0.3 nC _ �V ✓LuE �nLr Ll -L N N C q.- ✓K �Y uW ••� LTV PM L� O? y N q O N ✓_N N n ✓ V ° t' 10 rOn ID Or \nyI 0 V ° 6 ETI u v O�10+ 4„ I V�'� LV•� v � ^JJS CO qyL \II, C Cul m N� L v C L L f « Li N w t u y « •� d y L CS N•^ rV W L C •f VN E Y.� R LVC rrO [�'�L v'uA I'r �Lp 'O °L'V 1J O CuC V Oq q iNu ynE° i0y � °uT LLw °:- rrL'rYp -Tr •" ,Cq, „Ti " GI Yu C' L' V O••-TV N �V o° Y' LY NL>u F C� ,V Wp guy fC rr C C U •� O V « ° •°n rC°. CL. b °ubL Y L •�« 0 C j :rl�C .. V�..�T C .� u T V • � 1� G + «i'LL .l: '. �C �JJ Q•d 'VU Lc« NI % OV_LO ° Clii �L••CrJ m04 nn L q \V 4 N 4I :� LJ V C] 46 1_ ` u O Q� L G j., �I q •� V l W L V V d U LLO V O N y p 2�L.4n I I I VgOC nl AL C� .Nl 1 �° L qd« ^ c c O�•^ � ° • N � N 10 ETI u 11 ,, CITY OF RAI4CHO CUCAMONGA INITIAT, STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Enviro- ,=ental Assessment Review Fee: $60.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted tc the Development Review Committee through the departmen- where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: PARCEL MAP # 7000 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 986 8707 nRON 24 West I Street ontario 91762 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: CARL XXX $ CARL KELLER 6841 EUCALYPTUS AVE ANAHEIM LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) —South side of 19th Street 200' East of Jasper Ave. x1CGPQRnr No 7Q7 (194 1 "s LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None I -t PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _ 2 single family residences ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Area 24000 Sa Ft DESCRIBE THE MWIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCEPTIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): IIar.�grnRnA No vege *at,r,., nTO Flr�ra No Structures. nTn 'Aae,na Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? �Te 0 WILL THIS PROJECX: AMOk YES NO 11 x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? x 2.. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? xx 3_ -eate a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) ? _ 4_ Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? x 5:. Remove any existing trees? How many? x 6- Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, £lammsbles or explosives? Explanation of any YI= S answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, Complete the form on the next page_ C13RTIrICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Devel went Review Committee_ / Date �� Signature - Title l/ 2— .3 2 -3 i J'. tl RESIDElITIAL CONSTRUCTION The £olIOwinq information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Parcel Map 7000 . Specific Location of Project: _. t de of i 9th Street 300' East of Jasper T_ 4 PHASE I PRASE 2 PI•IASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2 2 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begir. ccnstruction: 4. Earliest late of occ_p ncy 2 I9oue1 ; and E of Tentative 5. Bedroo:ls Pric,� Rance J 3' % ;&- A4 - T_ 4 n E Ll OCTOBER 28, 1 TO: Members FROM: Jack Lam BY: Michael SUBJECT: 1:Q13 , Planning Commission AICP, Director of Community Development rin, Senior Planner ABSTRACT: A local church has requested review of a potential church sit— the intersection of Highland and Haven Avenues by the Planning Commission for direction regarding its location in the general vicinity. Staff has reviewed the request and has provided an analysis of the pro- posal for the Commission's review and consideration. Staff is seeking direction from the Planning Commission regarding the proposed location. BACKGROUND: Please find attached as Exhibits A -1 and A -2 a letter and map which indicates the proposed church site near the intersection of Highland and Haven Avenues as submitted by the applicant. The site on which the church is proposing to locate is approximately 10.3 acres. However, the church desires only to utilize approximately 3 acres of the total area. The church is seeking direction regarding the location of the 3 acres to be used, within the 10 acre site, given its proximity to the single family development in the area. ANALYSIS: Attached as Exhibit B is a vicinity map of the area indi- cating the existing subdivisions, zoning, and General Plan designations for the ai °a. Presently the site is zoned as R -1 (Single Family Resi- dential) development. The General Plan designates the area for low density residential development at 2 -4 dwelling units per acre. The Commission may recall that during the General Plan hearing there was an attempt by a development company to have the southeast corner designated as a commercial center. After review by the Commission and Council, the decision was made to designate the area for single family development which would become an extension of the existing subdivision. This deci- sion was based upon the facts that were other commercial centers planned and proposed in the immediate vicinity of this project site. ITEM H SEC Haven &. Highland Staff Report -2- October 28, 1981 The site map which the church has supplied indicates the church site located at the southern end of the 10 acre parcel. This proposal causes several land use problems which should be considered by the Commission in order to give appropriate direction to the church: 1. Location of the church at the southern end will segragate the remaining portion of the 10 acre parcel from the exisitng subdivision which would prevent a continuous subdivision design that would tie into the existing subdivision. 2. The location of the church at the southern end would cause potential compatibility problems with the homes which front on Heather Street and which would be facing tine proposed church site. 3. The church site could be used as a buffer between the proposed Foothill Freeway that would transverse the north piece of this property to the existing single family residential uses. 4. Encouragement of the church site at the southern end of she property will create a land use problem for the remaining portion of the 10 acre site. The Commission and Council already decided that commercial is not desirable at this location. Other high density developments would cause traffic problems because of the proposed on -ramp for the freeway. Please find attached as Exhibit C a sketch of how the exisitng single family subdivision could logically ext -id into this property and provide enough property for the church to deverop at the north end. This proposes a much more compatible land use pattern for both the church and the existing development in the area. Staff has considered the thought of a church on this 10 acre parcel and feels that a church facility could be appropriately designed given the proper location on the site. The church is requesting that the Commission provide them with some firm direction on which portier.of the site, in view of the Planning Commission, would be the most acceptable in terms of the location of a church facility. Staff has thoroughly reviewed this proposal and recommends that any church development in this general vicinity be located at the northern end of the property, in order to provide the most logical and compatible land use pattern. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider the request as submitted and the analysis which staff has recommended and provide the desired direction to the church in order to allow them to make the appropriate decisions. 0 SEC Haven and Highland Staff Report Respectfully su mitted, 1 al JACK LAM, AICP, Director of Community Development JL: MV: cd -3- October 28, 1981 Attachments: Exhibit A -1 - Letter Exhibit A -2 - Site map Exhibit B - Location Map Exhibit C - Development alternative E r...,: Northkirk United Presby::eriarn Church REV. GERALD D. LYMAN, WINISTER October 14, 1981 Rancho Caoamonga Planning Commission % Jack Lam P, O. Box 8U-7 Rancho wCamonga., CA 91701". Doa-- Oommissionerse I request an informal review at the October 28 meeting of the Planning Comte mission to discuss the location of a church site near the intersection of Highland and Raven. 'DwAnk you,. cca Property Committee Members The Rev, James Oliver The Rev, Ni111am Ditt2= g3/%acorelV yours.�- Richard J. welson, Chairman Property Committee 6259 OPAL STREET. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91709 . (794) 980 -0446 :r .r A t AVENUE — I � I A z� V i fl � �n a pwp w 6 w r• � aO„ Iv on ��o �t V x+ a'• T: _-P)ROPOSED SITE ylGo OrRIAN aJ ? 7) 47 IY �rJ !T rJ 3B LJ l 1 Q CA 2 0 4D c�aal 03 rn a Ib eot-15 , A-21 d . .rs frs �1 r? rrv) r� (••� It rl I2 � JIrF3 • 1 i 1 -- — — ^STREET ^ C.-M: c h s U O •a_} qs C13 i C �J Ic 1 i yl litcjMand suvlecj PrpP`,�y z r r H�ailcr Vwr -cA' 1 x o L u f- n1/°.+ye t 7 9 y l; , e ate` i C V NORTH ClTy ( )I' ITEM: i nUE-C-91 G} 1- d A lNCi -lo CUCtkl'IO\(v TITLE: _ . rhT1oN & PLANING DIVISION EXI 11BI r: _ F_ SC�NLE.. - C. 1 L— rCGtnlQV R.1Z_W. v n D 4 n f N CITY 0E- RANCHO CL'CtkN'10\Gr1 PLANNING DIVISla .\T a° R3 V NORTH ITf:.%I: TITLE :lEif7�►+ E. \I 1113IT; SCALE: