The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982/10/27 - Agenda Packet5 QTY OF 7RANr,HO CyU�CF�.^MONGA� �r ETC 4 r LCS.1 N 31 \TAT C0TU IS 7101 �tl AGENDA WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 27J, 1982 LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,.RANCHO CUCAM0,NGu1, CALIFORNIA _ _ T O1 —.4—. c nT1__.__.,_ C ! 1 0 N "o tjc o. nn":Qnmc II. Roil Call Commissioner Barker_ X Commissioner King X Commissioner McNiel —_ III. Consent Calendar � r,--(c2 7:00 F.M. Commissioner Renlpei X Commissioner Stout,_ The following Consent Calendar it-- s are expected .•o be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. Sf anyone has c•7ncern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. 5 -0 A. TIMS EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAPS 6863 A.ND 5726 IV. Public Hearings The following item ere public hearings in which concerned individuals imy voice t.zeir opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. All such opinions shall be li=::ed to 5 minutes per indi riaual for Each project. 5, CONSIIDDERATION GF REVOCATION OR MODIFICATION OF lrV1TV111 V1 \hL V.7G fGI1:911 I0-0a - DUAK J r1tRU - his is a review of potential modifications to the Conditions of Approval, which are intended to resolve the complaints and disturbances created by this establishment. The business is within the Rancho Plaza located on the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th. �1 �: APFROVED 5 -0 APPRG VED 5 -0 APPROVED 5 -0 APPROVED 5 -0 REPORT RECEIVED C. Plann5ng Commission Agenda October 27, 1982 Page 2 STEPHENS - A ivision of 2.2 acres�o �7andVintc 2 parcels within the R -1 zone (Etiwanda Specific Plan at the northwest corner of Summit and East Avenues. D. ENVIRON14ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL FLAP 7267 - LEaIS E MEN M3ANy - visjon of 468 t acres into 1 parcel with remainder within the A -1 zone (PC 81 -01 Fending) located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue - APN 227 - 151 -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, li, 12. * E. F. BIANE - A division of 14.88- acres� into r3parcels wit in Subarea 5 of the Industrial Specific Flan area located at the southwest corner of Turner Avenue and 8th Street - APN 209-- 201 -08, li -13, 16 -17. 1cv7V - u�A rRUNtRTIES - The total deveiopment of townhouse units on 9.2 acres of land in the R -3 /PD (Multiple Family /Planned Development) zone located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Feron Boulevard - APN 209- 051 -01. V. Director's Reports G. REPORT ON SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING STRATEGIES - ra -port UY KICK omez VI. Public Comments This is the time and place For the general public to address the Commission. items to be discussed here are those which do not 44'eady appear on this agenda- * This project falls within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Area. Planning Commission Agenda October 27, 1982 Page 3 9:30 p.m. VII. Adjournment The Planing Commission has adcpted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. The Planning Commission wall adjourn to November 4, 1392 to discuss the Draft- Etiwanda Specific Plan. ONTARIO INTE&*AT10NAL A11MOff" CITY OF RANCHO Ct=AMONGA' y�: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I W'g�. o PLANNING COTNUVESSIO Z AGENDA xA _ WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 27, 1982 7:00 P.M. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 SASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. °12dye �F All�ti ^.^C II. Roil Call Commissioner Barker Commissioner King Commi siMcNiet! III. Ccnsent Calendar Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Stout The following Consent Calendar items are expected to bm routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern ovar ang irem, it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAPS 6863 AND 6726 IV. Public Hearings The folloing items are public hearings in which concerned 'Individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and addr <_ss the Commi.sz ion from the public microphone by giving your name and address_ All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. $. CONSIDERATION OF REVOCATION OR I.VIIYlIlVI \/lL VJL rLIY'111 /�: -v./ - YV/l1� J it Gf1Y - _ This is a review of pctential mo ifications to the Conditions of Approval, which are intended to resolve the complaints and disturbances created by this establishment. The business is within the Rancho Dlaza located on the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th. Planning Commission Agenda October 27, 1982 Page 2 C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7869 - STEPHE S - A division of 2.. acres of land into p within the R -1 zone (Etiwanda Specific Plan), located at the northwest corner of Summit and East Avenues. D. ENVIRON19ENTAL ASSESSMEN3 ANN PARCEL MAP /eb/ - LEWIS DEVEL M K L I ?ANY - A divis-i-o-n--R-46-9- t acres into 1 parcel with remainder within the A -1 zone (PC 81 -01 pending) located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue - APH 227- 151 -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12. * E. EN IROWENTAL ASSE55MtN1 ANU PAKLtL MAP /M4 - BIANE - A division 5f 14.88 acres into 3 parcels it' Subarea 5 of the Industrial Specific Plan area located at the southwest corner of Turner Avenue and 8th Street - APN 209 - 201 -08, 11 -13, 16 -17. F- A 12090 - USA PROPERTIES - The total development of townhouse units on 9.2 acres of land in the R -31pD (Fluitiple Family /Planned Development) , zone located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Feron Boulevard - APN 209 - 051 -01. V. Director's Reports G. REPORT ON SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING STRATEGIES - Oral Report by Rick Gomez Vi. Public Comments TY,is is the time and place for the general public to address the C -,r. -ssior.. Items to be discussed here are those wltdc", do not already appear or this agenda. ' This project falls within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Area. Planning Commission Agenua October 27,.1482 Page ? VII. Adjournment: The Planning Commission has adopted Administx-ative ?tegvlations that set an 11 p.m. adjouznment lime. If items go beyond 1-22at tine, they shall be heard only with the . ^onsent of the Commission. Thc- Planning Commission will adjourn to November 4, 1982 t� "y.�r f, � t'w 1 :T. {ti Yi. i .?� C ONFARfp gAat Ajop pf LJ CITY OF RA14CHO CUCAIACINGA STAFF REPORT October 27, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Cea:aissicn FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Time Sxtpnsion requestg for Pa -cn1 Map 6863 and : -arcel Map 6726 Parcel Map 6863 is an industrial subdivision of 71.9 acres of land *being divided into four ;4) parcels located between 4th and 6th Streets, west of proposed Rochester Avenue. This map was tentatively approved by the Planning Commissionon May 37, 1981 and expires on November 27, 1982. R. C. Land Co., developers of Parcel Map 6863 has requested an extension of time due to the current economic conditions and the construction of improvements under Assessment District 82 -1. Parcel Map 6726 is a commercial subdivision of 5.09 acres of land to be divided into 8 parcels located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Foothill Blvd. Tentative approval was given by the Planning Commission on April 22, 1981, and will expire on October 22, 1982. L*,:org /Watkins Commercial Properties, developer of Parcel Map 6726, has requested an extension due to financial conditions of the present market. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution granting a one year's extension for Parcel Map 672E and Parcel Map 6863. / Respectfully submitted, ITEM A C4 TE/YrAr1VF' P.4RC45: A -fAjP' NO GBCo13- W,sd CttT Or Rna..c.+o GUCJtFCM[6 -.. couwT�. � � O�BR1.Y Qdl•� t3.YTii JPr C•r_.n0'a),q. !]Ylv q O,� OIV1eiQ) O� A 1�- y2fL_L CP tW �nPFUO1.aw>. �(:IL 1�JO1 p,OCe.rT,:• wf OLOp16Jri0 a.1Y. 72.66 �u1LLtAME�OiJ A1.D 9CbM� CTflt �__ -�°°Q 4 F>*J;Z�S- "t.9 /aCRCa s: �fi>•rsWrsv..r _ .. -� —•vac' - -x ��.a�. =--'— _aG:G1Jc= 1' � 2pC�� UUL: ITT i °L`^ 4' .afl- mss, I w 1 RC � ~`� � M iW.Y Ld1 W. FCOCMILL BL \IO. �• �aU1TG • C _ �� ii\ 1 i-�vr •r I J wnle• m eep co..c �a1�t• y D cTn� mycuw wur.. om l a scrwc� "0�� z rr:at alc. sasac o�..c La Qfi{Y�O Q! OM1Q {�91J1g6J. 7.L] __ 4TV� ��4�� , � SI.A\iL7 AGir�. M10C OICJB�T l Tb 11.114)GHaTIOI.i. 1 _ of 301 n.ol.ac Z=iyn, nt �, / 4Tltl. vtJO� g Q `¢ 4T" STR'LE jf.�vw abwYe +eor.. - r� -voa.o r.uaTme �..r I w 11 1 NCWITY MGP W 4U.�t • T�JlOAJp V. t 1 U E E <r R--C-- LAND COMPANY 70340 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 97730 (774) 9803040 October 8, 1982 Mr. Paul A. Rougeau Senior Civil Engineer City of Ra.nchn Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 RE: Parcel Map 6863 Dear Paul: Please accept this as a written request to extend the expiration date of Parcel Map 6863 beyond November 27, 1982. The causes for the extension are: current economic conditions, and; the delayed start of construction on the Industrial Assessment District 82 -1. I am enclosing a check for $62 for the extension, request fee. We did not get this request in 60 days prior to the expiration because: your letter was sent to us on September 24, 1982 or later, and; was mailed to an out of date address. Your office was kind enough to call us yesterday, and we are responding immediately. Rather than taking the time to have a company check made and mailed, the enclosed check is from my personal account. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. JND /pad cc: Dick Ortwein Dick Frankel Yours truly, 1 Joseph N. Dilorio E, Ni. Paul Pougeau Senior Civil Engineer City of Rancho C uommnaa 9320 Baseline Poad Suite C P.O. Box 807 Rancho C acm=ga, CA 91730 Re: Parcel Map 6726 Foothill & Archibald Rancho Cucamonga, CA �`Y NJ ICJ J� CITY OF R4140HO Cli^,MPr'ONCA Er>GINEIEMNI D:VhS!O "1 Dear Mr. Rougeau: !; 1 Pursu mt to your letter of September 24, 1982 enclosed is our check in the amcunt of $62.00 to .extend the above parcel map. Our project has been slowed to proceed due to the financial conditiwis of the market, howevei, we are getting geared up now for :roving ahead at full steam. I have sent to my en; veer, Iodanan & Associates, a revised plot plan which will snow the parcel map boundaries for the parcel cap so that we can continue or work cn the parcel :nap and get it finalized. I would appreciate it if you would please extend our parcel map. Sincerely. QLMIG- VULMUNS PROPERrTLES Barry 'pn Id ns Managing General Partner BW:tdq Enclosure r cc: Fred Meyer/Lockman & Associates rg14 Orangewood Avenue / Suite 1021 Orange California 92668 / f714) 97&93T1 '^ 'k ' � c�C :1l�ii..'��wi.: <r�kGSXi�►e�i ;=:'Sar .. _,.: e, 'h,:. ..a.�.,•i:m�:: >w. w.'u.�r• •.. -.l ):♦5�,"Wi.�"liwi RESOLUTION NO. • A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE EXTENSIONS FOP. TENTATIVE PARC:;L MAP 6863 AYD 6726 WHEREAS, an application has been filed for a time extension for the above- described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2(b) of Ordinance 28 -B, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved described tentative Parcel. Map. SECTIN 1: following findings: ;ommission has made That prevailing economic conditions have caused a lack of financing; That these economic conditions make it un•easonable to build at this time; That external physical conditions have eatsed delay in the start of constructin; That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance; and That the granting of said time extensions rill not be detrimental to the public health, safety, )r welfare, or materially injurious to properties or impr.,)vements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for the above - described project as follows: Parcel Map Revised Expiration Date 6863 November 27, 198.3 6726 October 22, 1983 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: CHAIRMAN E 11 J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 27, 1982 TO: Members o{ the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Comez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Plainer SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78 -03 - BOAR'S HEAD - A the operation to contain bar and entertainment conjunction with restaurant usage. permit to allow facilities in SUMMARY: This report has been prepared at the request of the Plannine Commission and is intended to be a (2iscussion guide for the public hearing. Tiiis report covers the intent of the original approval, current and past problems with the establishment and a list of potential miti;?tion measures. The previous Staff Report of September 22, 1982 included more detail on the background and history of this establishment. The Commission basically has two options; find that the nuisances cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level and revoke the permit for the bar and entertainment facilities, or modify the CUP by adding conditions whic4 would mitigate the associated impacts. ORIGINAL APPROVAL: The original application states that the tenant intended to operate a quality lunch and dinner restaurant operation with on -sale beer, wine and liquor facilities for musical entertainment (piano or small musical combo). Additionally, a condition of the Conditional Use Permit requires that bar and entertainment facilities must be used in conjunction with the restaurant usage. Our investigation on this matter has revealed that dinner is not served at the Boar's Head. Basically, they have a limited menu, which a patron can order from only until 4:00 p.m. After that time, no food is served. COMPLAINTS: In the previous Staff Report, it was reported that complaints date back To early 1980. Recently, the majority of complaints have been related to noise disturbances. This has been either from patrons leaving the bar or the music from within the bar. Although the establishment has had a recent chance irc ownership, Sheriff activity and complaints are still being received. ITEM 8 Conditional Use Permit 78 -03 /Boar's Head Planning Commission Agenda October 27, 1982 Page 2 OPTIONS: There are two options available to the Commission: A. The first option would be to revoke the Conditoral Use Permit. This would cause the establishment to remove the bar and entertainment facilities. The revocation could be done if the Commission found that the bar and entertainment uses cause disturbances which cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level compatible with the neighborhood character. B. The second option would be to modify the conditions of the Conditonal Use Permit to an extent which mould mitigate the disturbances. Following is a list of mitigation measures which the Commission may want to consider in a modification. 1. Limit the hours of operation to a more restrictive time. One of the major complaints is noise end disturbances created by patrons leaving the facility in early morning hours. 2. Strengthen and enforce the requirement for bar and entertainment uses to be used in conjunction with a restaurant. 3. Maintain on -site security guard. The Sheriff's Department feels that this measure would not significantly heip. This is due mainly to the idea that too much friction is caused between security and patrons. Periodic policing of the parking lot by the management of the facility would be more effective. 4. Block access from the main parking area to the parking area in the northwest corner of the site: (See attached sketch.) 5. install a minimum 5 -foot wide planter at the northwest corner of the site (see sketch). The planter shall be densely r ;anted and provided with an irrigation system. 6. Speed bumps should be placed throughout the site. 7- A comprehensive sound analysis of the building shall be conducted by a sound engineer to determine the need for sound insulation and /or interior sound level monitors. Music from within the business should rot be detectable to the human ear outside of the building wails of the establishment. 8. The rear door of the business shall remain closed during evening hours, except in the event of an emergency. r, E 11 11 0 Conditional Use Permit 78 -03 /Boar's Head Planning Commission Agenda October 27, 1982 Page 3 9. The northwest parking area shall not be used by Boar's Head patrons or employees. 10. A re- examination of this business shall be conducted by the Planning Commission within six (C) months of the modification of this permit. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing and notices were sent to surrounding property owners. Staff has discussed potential mitigation measures with the homeowners in the area as well as the business owner. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct the public hearing and consider all material and testimony presented. Staff has provided two Resolutions which reflect the two options available to the Commission. 11 RICK GOMEZ City Planner RG:MV:jr Attachments: Original Resolution 78 -40 Site Pian Resolution of Revocation Resolution of Modification. t RESOLUTION NO. 78-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE RA.NCI1O C'UCAMONGA PLANNI; :G CO- �LMISSION FOR THE APPROVAL OF CUP 75 -03 - HONE TO ALLOW A RESTAURANT 16iiti RELATED BAR FACILITIES AIM M1L'SICAL ENTTRTAIP?iENT WITHIN A PROPOSED NEIGH - BORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER AT THE NORTHviEST CORi1E:R OF CARNELIAN AND 19TH STREET IN THE C -1 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 5th day of December, 197b, a complete application was filed for review on the above described property; and WHEREAS, on the 27th day of December, 1978, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. The site is adeouate in size and shape to acco=modate the proposed use, and landscaping and setbacks are pro- vided which are compatible with existing development in the surrounding area. 2. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed, both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. 3. There will not be an adverse effect upon abutting pro - perty. 4. In requiring the conditions in the report, the Commission deems such requirements to be the minimum necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare_ 5. This project will not be objectionable nor detrimental to existing uses permitted in the zone district in which this project is located. F. This project will not be contrary to the objectives of the proposed Master Plan and will not be in conflict w:_th the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That the Planning Commission sets the following conditions on the above described project: 1. Developer shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Cnifor= Plumbing Code, National Electric Code and all other applicable ccdes. l 46 2. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at this time. 3. All signing shall be in conformance with the adopted uniform signing program. 4. Hours of operation shall not exceed 11 a.m. to 2 a.m. 5. The CUP is granted for a period of indefinite tir..e with Planning Commission review after 24 months of operation at which time the Commission may add or delete conditions. 6. Bar and entertainment facilities must be used in conjunc- tion with the restaurant usage. 7. The applicant shall agree in writing to all conditions within 60 days from approval. APPROVED AM ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF Decoaber , 1978 PLA14NING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMONGA i Herman Rempel, Chairma Secretary of the Planning Commission. i, JACK UM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuca- monga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of December, 1978. AYES: COPLMISSIONERS: DAEL, TOLSTOY, GARCIA, RFr.IPEL NOES: CO MISSIO:.'ERS: N01E ABSL%7: COM ISSIONERS: JONES 11 -:: t-7., - -�._ _.. CITY OF RAT'�CHO CUC iNlo A PLANNING axrLION ITEN EXHt SCALE: u r.1 U 1I RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA140NGA PLANNING COMMISSION REVOKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 78 -03 FOR BAR AND ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES IN THE BOAR'S HEAD ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED IN THE C -1 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of September, 1982, the Planning Commission determined the need to suspend Conditional Use Permit 78 -03 and to conduct a public hearing; and AHEP.EAS, on the 27th day of October, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: Conditional Use Permit 78 -03 which allowed bar and entertainment amities in conjunction with a restaurant in a neighborhood shopping center is hereby revoked based on the following findings: 1. That these uses have been causing disturbances to the residents within the neighborhood. 2. That this use has been detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, and materially injurious to properties and improvements in the vicinity. 3. That there are not sufficiert conditions which can be applied to the CUP which would bring the use in accord with the purposes of the General Plan or zone district. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS * DAY OF *, 19 *. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chainnan AT TEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission Is JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Cucamonga, do hereby certify Commison of the City regularly introduced, passed, and adopted y the foregoing Resolution y d Rancho City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting the Planning Coneaissionuof the on the * day of *, Ig *1 by the following vote-to-wit: wthe Planning Commission held AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS 0 11 L 11 RESOLUTION * A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA140NGA PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78 -03 FOR BAR AND ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES WITHIN THE BOAR`$ HEAD ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED IN THE RANCHO PLAZA IN THE C -1 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of September, 1982, the Planning Commission determined t:e need to suspend Conditional. Use Pem.,,,it 78 -03 and tc conduct a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, on the 27th day of October, 1982, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above item. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Flanning Commission resolves as follows: SECTION 1: Additional conditions and changes are found to be needed for Conditional Use Permit 78 -03 in order to mitigate the past disturbances and bring the use in accord with the intent and purpose of the neighborhood shopping district. Therefore, the following conditions are added to those already in effect per Resolution 78 -40: 1. Limit the hours of operation from 10 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 10 a.m. to midnight Friday and Saturday. Periodic policing of the parking lot by the management of the business should be done on a nightly basis to assist in averting disturbances - from patrons. Block ttt99��in P nst� no n ense access to the northwest arking area by placing &Kers_Jp the fi�fiveway. ly 2 and parking area from the three (3) large trees 5. A detailed plan indicating planter irrigation systems, and landscape mat submitted to and approved by the City P th' - Tns inspection he accone _,,,:�x y 0) days of this action. locations, fanner wimnin tallation and ished within 6. ,7peed bumps shall be placed throughout the center. 7i A comprehensive sound analysis of the building Shall be conducted by a qualified acoustical engineer to determine the needs for sound insulation and /or interior sound level monitors. Music from within the business should not be detectable to the human ear within twenty -five (25) feet of the building walls of the establishment. This study shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this action and any improv_ments accomplished withing sixty (E0) days of thi: action. The study shall be received by the City prior to any improvements. 8 ` D9- 10. 11. n The rear door of the business shall remain closed during evening hours, except in the event of an emergency. !� The northwest parking area shall not be used by Boar's Head patrons or employees. lIIIvJJJJ This Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before ' the Planning Commission withi on s f t action, for a report on the performance of the es = estab :;shment. The business shall alter its operation to restaurant usage and food service during the hours. This is required to meet the intent original aporoval and shall be accomplished sixty (6O) days of this action. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS * DAY OF *, 19*. PANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission include evening of the within El E L.J I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the * day of *, 14 *, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COKMISSIONERS: NOES: COKMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 D El E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 27, 1982 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer By: 3arbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSt��mtw+ Hnu r/iK1,cL 3•0:r IV07 - A residential subdivision of 2.2 ages within the R -1 zone (Etiwanda Specific Plan) located at the northwest corner of Summit and East Avenues Prefect and Site Description: The applicant is requesting approval of a residential subdivision of 2.20 acres c` land into 2 parcels, each new parcel being 1.10 acres. This site is located at the northwest corner of Summit and East Avenues. Parcel No. 2 contains an existing residence with a detached garage. The project site is covered with Orange and Eucalytus trees and slopes approximately 4% from north to south. To the north of the site is an existing lemon grove, to the west are existing residences and vacant land, to the south is vacant land and to the east is an existing elementary school. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan designates this area for estate residential land use (1 acre lots). Analysis: At the present time East Avenue is dedicated as an 88 foot right -of -way. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan reduces this right -of- way to 66 feet. Since off -site improvements are required on a parcel with an existing residence, the applicant will be required to enter into a lien agreement as security for the construction of these improvements for Parcel No. 2 upon approval of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Conditions of the parcel map include the preservation of the windrow on East Avenue. Environmental Review: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmenal checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial St,:dy and field investigation, Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the enviroriment as a result of the proposed subdivisiL . Correspondence: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FNVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7689 - LEWIS October 27, 1982 Page 2 Recommendation: It is all input and elements Commission can support in the City Engineer's would be appropriate. be issued. J Resp�,e�ctfullyj submitted, LBH: :jaa recommended that the Planning Commission consider of the project. If, after such consideration, the the recommended conditions of approval as written Report, then adop+ion of the attached resolution It is also recoRrw_nded that a Negative Declaration Attachments: Map City Engineer's Report Initial Study Resolution 11 r�1 U Ll E C� AUGUST 1982 M .TENTATIVE SNEE7 ! OF I IDA RCEL MAP NO, 7669 "IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOAC14 BEIIJG A DNiSION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NC. 3242, OF PARCEL MAP BOOK 29, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF SAN BER.NARDWO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. LINVILLE-SANDERSON 8 ASSOCIATES Civil Engexers 8 LonOSuneyors 9587 Arrow Route, Suite H" Rancho Cucomm9o, Ca 91763 (7!4) 980 -121: .11dJ A .. 1 i �l ,a ^u r,r / ST,otAI I .fsbr R lArpf�7 /pro" sueavvixe� Y lf/ mM We# t. o AW /s . Cc etA.A elm) do- AM WAVY ACW wr OF owe A" .!. M,m'h d' Cst Al b TA. ,91C A" A.-W . lr ,a ^u r,r / ST,otAI I .fsbr R lArpf�7 /pro" sueavvixe� Y lf/ mM We# t. o AW /s . Cc etA.A elm) do- AM WAVY ACW wr OF owe A" .!. M,m'h d' Cst Al b TA. ,91C A" A.-W . lr PROJECT . SITE f Ll _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: Merle Stephens TENTATIVE MAP NO.PM 7689 LOCATION: -.Northwest corner of Summit and East DATE FILED:9 /21/82 NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A division of Parcel 2 of Parcel RECEIPT NUMBER: Man No 3242 of Parral `yap 79 Pare 20 t7ocords of FEE: 5273.00 can Bernardino row Y, State of California ZONE:R -1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * + TENTATIVE t'AP REPARED `lY: Linville- Sanderson GROSS ACREAGE: 2.2 ADDRESS: 9587 Arrow Rte., Suite H MINIMUM LOT AREA: Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ,, r * * * * RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE kirfred and Sadie Stephens 9226 Live Oak, Fontana, CA 92335 523 -7828 REPORT C,F THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown, on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by final map of the fcllowing missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on :additional feet on _ Corner P!L radius require on Other 3. Rights of venicular access shall be limited as follows: x_ 4. Street vacation)tkW - r)W for: a portion of East Ave. may pe require upon approval* 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: 5. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: *of the Etiwanda Specific Pian. RCE 20 , TENTATIVE MAP ND. 7589 — Page Lien Agreement Improvements (M►YBMA is re uiredp -' �T�+ -r • �a M. Recardang for Parcel 2 Bonding is required prior toy Building perm t�arM—r -_-__� 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, • sidewalk, one drive approach per lot. parkway trees and street lights) on ali interior streets. X-- b Construct t?e follewing missing improvements on the full } *includin landscan -In and irrigation or, meter OW7ng streets CURB & A.C. SIDE -i BRIVE STREET STREET MEDIAN STREET Nih',_ GLITTER PVMT. WALK i APPR. Taccc 1 , . X % ' �au,1,J , ISLA`4D *; OTHEP East. Ave. 3 � ; - 3 % X i windrow to be pr�se Summit Ave. % X X f i 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the laity Engineer. X Provide all utility services to each :ot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television;.corduit. All utilities are to be underground. X ll. Developer shall coos- jirate, and where necessary, pay for t}:e relocatian of any power pules or other existing public uti'ities as necessary. X 12. I,,stall appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is to provide all cjnstruction plans for drainage and street im- X ?�. promen s. Such plans shall meet cnpreval of the City Engineer. Sanitary and water systems shall be designee to Cucamonga Co mty hater Distract standards. A letter, of acceptance is required. X 7 =. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Sruthe,.; Calitornia Ediso: company pea the City of Rancho Cu- Poles With u- ;dergr•o:and service. aronga steall be decor«tive 15. The follewing existing streets being torn up by new services will require Ln A.C. overlay: 17. The o ow?ng specific dimensions widths) are not �Y-e•, cu,- de -.a� radius, street section 8pproved' lo. sne owing ex1stinc streets are substandard: The> will require: ,nr, rove lS and Fees - - _ 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of aooreva? from CALTRj;dS/ San Bernardino County Flood Control District. % 20. Approvals have rot been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies im nlve.i. Aareval o+ the final map will be subject to any requirerents that may be received from hest. RCE 20 TEP:TATIVE MAP NO. 7689 Page 3 WX— 21. Permits from ot=her agencies will be required as follows: 11 A. Caltrars, for: _ B. City: _ C. County s *. batemen t District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep: E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: Map Control 22. if only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right-of -way- ine ;n` accord - ance with the City of Rancho Cuca. -nnga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. the Doundary of the Tentative Map needs c arification as fo lows: 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. Parcel MaD Waiver L8. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for ) ❑ Building perm t for ) 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the !lationai Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. _ :iO. A drainage channel and /or flood proteccion wall along the entire north pro- perty line nmay be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. 31. I` water surface is abeve top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. _ 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations: 33. Broad scale hydrglogic studies Nimi be recuired to assess impact of Increased runoff. RCE 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmentai Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the Project- anr ^)icat ic is 3.. ''n v p o recei pt of this ap ?licaticrn, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Conarittee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration Will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environfnertal impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. 0 PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Parcel Mao No. 1689 V APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Winfred & Sadie Stephens c/o Merle ste�hens 9226 Live Oak, Fontana, CA 92335 (714) 823 -7628 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE Or" PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Linville-Sanderson & Assaciateg 9587 Arrow Route. Gujt- H. Ran hp Cycar;oncra. CA 91730 (714) 980 -1211 y LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 132P4 S21TIrtit AVe ^ +,a *iura nAa a __ A'cez=s narcol Na. '725 -»� -66 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LDCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 TENTATIVE 11AP NO. 7689 Page 4 Miscellaneous X 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. 37_ This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: X 39. Proper grading and erosion control, including the preventation of sedimenta- tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. _ 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. X 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guars ^tee that set:,er treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(0)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the tree and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the s ign, ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the fin map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion; within the specified time limits of said Section. _X 43. At the time of Final Nap submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as referen_e and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. —44. Development shall be -limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use con„ on drive approaches at lot lines_ 45. The garage located on parcel 2 will have to be removed at time of streat construc- tion_ If the Etiwanda Specific Plan reduces the right -of -way of East Avenue, the garage will set inside the property line and this condition will be waived. CITY OF U.NCH0 CUCAdON A LLOYD B. HLBBS CITY ENGRIECER By: RCE 20 E PROJECT DESCRIPTT^.' DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT. No. 3242, P.M.B. : c. Subdivide parcel 2 of- ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF E);ISTINC AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Total area is 2.20 acres. DESCRIBE THE ERVIRONP'ENTAL SETTING OF THE PRO�?E� SITE INCLUDING iNFORNIAT!ON ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS CTRtES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTUP.AL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC A�P£'CTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION �4F ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE {ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): This project site is covered with organge and eucalyptus trees. The topoar.api•v has a n sr « pinw_Irocn -- rcn t., south of auproximately 4% On the north sza On the west side is resi.den ial lara2 si.ye_jwirh hcsses. On the south Bice is SuMmit Avenue with an open field bevond that. On the east side is East Avenue with a school beyond that. On proposed parcel I is an existing--old barn On oroposed parcel 2 there are existing st uc res oo 2:-E- -house Sara a and shed Is this project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which althouah individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? 1 -2 E r1 L WILL THIS PROJECT: ® YES NO 11 lu _ x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ x ?. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ x 3. Create a substantial charge in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewa a, ctr )? x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 12 + _ x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of - potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flamrnables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers abcve: _ Future * mrovernents along -ast AvPni,e of RA, cel I • -•ill require some tree removal- IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I `urther understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. _ Date Signa *_ure :' .• .� '' Title I -3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following infoi, ration should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name cf Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 1. Number of single faimi ly units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model and 0 of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Ranqe I -4 11 TOTAL 11 11 1 MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 27, 1982 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd S. Nubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7267 LEI-IS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A divisien of 468 acres into 1 parcel with remainder within the A -1 z,me (PC 81 -01 pending) located on the north side of Foothill Blvd., west of Rochester Ave Project anal Site Description:_ This site is located at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Blvd. in an existing A -1 zone (P.C. 81 -01 pending). The property is bounded on the north by the Victoria Planned Community; on the south by vineyards; on the west by vacant land (proposed Terrra Vista Planned Commonit;,) and on the east by existing single family residences. The site is vacant with native vegetation. Grape growing on the land was ended many years ago. Analysis: Lewis Development Co. is proposing to subdivide the area for the purpose of acquiring clear title on Parcel 2 by releasing that parcel from deed of —ust. No develomPnt is proposed on any of the parcels. It is the subcividPr's intention that as payments to the sellers are being made to release additional lands from deed of trust, the subdividers will apply for lot line adjustment to merge the additional land to Parcel 1 so that no small lot is created within, the parcel boundary. As no development is proposed at this time and each of the parcels contains more that 200 acres, the requirement of dedication of rights -of- way and the related improvements are deferred until development occurs. All development will be governed by the pending Terra Vista Community Plan. Envi- onmentai Review: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant, Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7267 - LEWIS October 27, 1982 Page 2 of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. Correspondence: Notice; of Public ?searing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in t:'A Daily Pepert Newspaper. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such considerations, tre Conanission can support the recomme;ided conditons of approval as written in the City Engineer's keport then adoption of the attached reso'ution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Respectfully submitted, i LB14. K:jaa Attachments: Map City Engineer's Report Initial Study Resolution E E E El u L 13 AI AP PARCEL AIAP NO. 726 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA >CSPL 11VY�iV ILUY Ui n JOK!: VN CJ '.CZ;�r e 10VNDM1. t AL'!N. MM�:C f YC..T 1n Nf'NV nt'v: �O ' CA:C YN9 NL>$DIM :Y TIR C.TY ;.I MxCNy " %f- MVYG/.. CUVN:T OI YM >CPNPnD:nV, :'NTt. �;I C.L•!HlNwlw AS 3N' On nCL9N0 UL i MCP, x[- CDpm IY POOR 1. MCL l:N. PLCV IL'J •v O1' 1Ln V!^'. n[L9wOL Of 5>Y YPNMI:PO CJON�T, MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES. INC. .^.zv �aeJ. .Le avz mroN[> .c +c h i'• �� /:;WITY , / !A') tic r � e' +1 VIC3 AUGUST 1982 NO SCN `Cf /O Ol /r iy w�f ,vro J_ r uar •w �, .CIM S.T CI r. lr rula..DUC• b rpfr y ,I .T. -_ /. ..+'-.8r o'i -n.�. . �� ♦ A ` /..v...w rr wr L . -r..,. , .rte•.. T .�.,. �.- Jy:.,�� a -'1, !..�� 1 -�J i 1 � - �- F _-.rte ..—'".. <• T "'II'. f1[ 1� �'ar -M'- t y�Ar r.�, � •.Y �_ -Y •f••. rb [•_f1�YI.CY> .... > }.4 L >:.. 7 -- Hm +- nfr f. .Y .P.. .N arI I�Ii, •I = cwo .L• � SfLi.I "t L } a m v _y CMU4C.V -s_3TllCf y w , z c r,j r • V z III .,.f •• • i-rj �. Lr REMAINDER J+ L �. },.:� •'� •`_�� PARCEL y _ ` ' 1Z, t : r T "'II'. f1[ 1� �'ar -M'- t y�Ar r.�, � •.Y �_ -Y •f••. rb [•_f1�YI.CY> .... > }.4 L >:.. 7 -- Hm +- nfr f. .Y .P.. .N arI I�Ii, •I = cwo .L• � SfLi.I "t L } a m v _y CMU4C.V -s_3TllCf y w , z c r,j r • V z P.M. 7267 oc r r title; `a✓ CITY OF RANCHO C[;C "10NGA P.M. 7267 1 oil , m ENGINEERING DIVISION t �i6 din 9> VICINITY MAP page 8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all px:.jects requiring environmental review, this ford must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Ccn—ittee through the department where the project application_ is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Cemmittee will meet and tak<, action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental i_ -mpact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information raaort should be supplied L•y the applicant giving further informa- tion, concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7267 APPLICANT'S NAIF , ADDRESS,_ TELEPHONE:LEWI0 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 1156 N. Mountain Avenue, i.3 _ , —�QPZD CAS o i r f NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 11500 E. Foothill Blvd. - 227 - 151= Q2r-Thru 227 - 151 -0E, 22i-151-0iO t ru - 1 -U12 LIST OTHER PERMLTS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: C.C.W.D. (SEWER AND WATER) FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT. ate.+. fu .cveueu ". J �vuwtz Jv.1L CKVblIIN 9NO DUST CONTROL DISTRICT (DUST CONTROL) I -1 � c PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: TENTATIVE FiRCEL NAP NO. 7267 WHICH SUBDIVIDES AN sRfA FOR F UTUF ACREAGE OF PROJECT ARE.A1 AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND _ROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 468 :1303 ACRES DESCRIBE THE ENVIROMIENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPH ", PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL R SCENIC ASPECTS, t'SE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION Or ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE ATTACH NECESS? Y SHEETS? TOPO: 2 -3a NORTH/SOUTH DIRECTION PLANTS: MISC. TREES ?LONG- PERZN"= E_ E TO FUTUFE MILLIKEN AVENUE-PZ5 i DF SITE -PR=NTLY COVER= WITH G. <APE VINES EXISTING USE OF SITE: VINEYARD -� USR OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: i 3`U -THE EAST, LICTCRIA P.C. TO TffZ -70 TFi VINEYARDS TO Gr I PORTION OF PROPOSED TERRA VIS ALAN THE Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which alt-hough individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? /N/0 - 0 I -2 L -'I WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. X 4. X 5. Create a substantial charge in demand for S^..'..•..^.i: ipui S<^.^ : cS 'pviiCe, lire, :dater, sewage, etc.)?y Create charges in the existing zoning or general plan_ designations: Remove any existi g trees';' How nany" X G. Create the need 2or ise or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, f lazimables or explosives? Explanacion of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the =orm o• the next page. CERTIFIC_3TION: I hereby certify that the statemerts furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further -nderstand that additional _ in£orr_ation may be required to be submitted before an adequate eva ?..aticn can be :wade by the Development Review] Committee. Date August 11,2982 Signature Title AUTORIZED AGENT t` 1-3 a � - RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The foll -Owing i:-,= 35 •Jt1ic be prOVided t0 Plannin; Diciaior_ in order to aid in assessing heeabili�of Rancho Cucamonga district to ar;c;!racdate the proposed residential development, the school Name of Developer and Tentative Tract NO.: NCT APPLICABLE Specific Location_ of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Nu.ber of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of ccumancy: *model 0 and # Of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range �i -r lE•.I 1-4 0 ® REST' -UTION NO. } A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COM MISSIOM OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC9MORGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7267 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7267), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7267, submitted by Lewis I>PFeI ^p ^a_ ^_t i= _,,a—^.F W.d c-c- 14sting of 2 parcels, located at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, being a division of a portion of Section 6, Township 1 South; Range ? West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as shown on Record of Survey, reccrded:n Soot: 1, Page 116; and WHEREAS, on September 7, 1982, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described Tentative lip; and WHEREAS, on October 27, 1982, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, TAE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNINC COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTIOii ;: That the following findings have been made: That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not crea.te significant adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on October 27, 1982. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7267 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer *s Report pertaining thereto. �J C J CITY OF RANCYO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: Lewis Development Co. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Foothill Blvd. and Rochester Avenue TENTATIVE MAP N0. DATE FILED: 9/9/82 NUMBER OF LOTS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Section 6 T.I.S. R.6. RE:EIPT NU "•1BER: W. San Bernardino Base and Meridian FE c. 9273.00 ZONE A -1 PM 7267 TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Madole & Assoc;ates GROSS ACREAGE: 469± ADDRESS: 600 N. Mountain Avenue, Ste. D -204 MIN17•tUM LOT AREA: Upland, CA 91785 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE Lewis Development Co. 1156 N. Mountain, Upland, CA 91786 714/985 -0971 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications 1. Dedication by final map of ail interior st -eet rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on _ additional feet on additional feet on _ Corner P/L radius required on Other 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follo:vs: 4. Street vacation required for: — — 5. ;taster Plan of Streets revision required for: fo6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as ("lows: RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP N0. 7267 Page 2 Improvements (Bording is required prior to C Recording for L4 Building permit for a i parcziS 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, vement sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets. X 8. Construct the following missing improvements or. the following streets: *Including landscapinc and irrinatin., .. ....* -- STREET NAME Foothill Blvd. CURS & ( GUTTER X A. C. PVMT. X SIDE- WALK X DRIVE APPR. X STREET TREES X STREET LIGHTS X SdEDIAN ISLAND *i OTHER I X I i Base Line X X ; X X X X X Rochester X X X X X X X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. X 10. Provide ail utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities are to he underground. _ X 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. _ X 12. iistall appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and 1�vpes approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans f(,;-- and street im- provements_ Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. X 14. Sanitary sewer and crater systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County '. water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X - 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be der_orative poles with underqround service. 16. The following, existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C_ overlay: 17. The fc ow -ng specific dimensions, i.e., cui -de -sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: 18. The fo owing existing streets are substandard: They will require: Approvals and Fees 19. This subdivision shall be subject_ to conditions of San Sarnardino County Flood Control District_ X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities Gies involved. Approval of the final map will be that may be received from them. RCt 20 approval from CALTRANS/ 2nd other interested agen- subject to any requirement0 TENTATIVE MAP X10. 7267 Page 3 0 x 21. Permits from other agencies will, be required as follows: A. Caltrans, for: B. City: X C. County Dust Abatement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Pennit if any trench s are over 5' deep: X E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other Map Contro! _ 22. if only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two-way traffic and parking or all affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: 24. All corner lots ;hall have a corner radius at the right- of-way ins in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. Tne boundary of the Tentative Map needs clarification as follows: 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. Parcel Mao Waiver 28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control {Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for ) D Building permit fc— r -" 1 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to f1 cod- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. 30. A drainage channel and /er flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks thraugh culverts. 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations: 33. Broad scale hydrolonic studies wi be requireu to assess ir;pact runoff. or increased RCE 20 E 11 IJ DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 27, 1982 Planning Commission Lloyd B Hubbs, City Engineer Barbara Kra ?1, Engineering Technician A division of 14.88 acres into of the Industrial Specific Plan corner of Turner Avenue and 8th CEL MAP 7864 - BIANE parcels within SubArea No located at the southwest Street tan Project and Site Description: The applicant is submitting the above described parcel map tc divide 14.88 acres into 3 parcels. This site located within the Industrial Specific Plan SubArea No. S contains the Biane Winery. All newly created parcels contain structures as shown on the attached map. A tenant is considering Parcel 1 with its existing buildings for an industrial use and further site development. To the east is an existing church and residental housing, to the west and south is vacant land and to the north is the Santa Fe Railwav tracks. The site slopes slightly from the north to the south and east. The surrounding area is within the Industrial Area. Analysis: All parcels are large enough in size to enable adequate access, parking and landscaping as "shown on attached site plan. There is approximately 300 feet of 4 inch rack curb and gutter existing in front of the winery building located on Parcel No. 2. No other curb and gutter exists. The construction of 8 -inch curb and outter is being required for the entire remaining frontage since all parcels are developed. The existing rock pilasters on Eight Street will not be affected by construction of curb and gutter. Environmertal Review: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the uppiicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conduted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. Correspondence: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding propety owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. ITEM c PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7864 - BIANE October 27, 1982 Page 2 Recommendation: It is .recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. if, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. Also a Negative Declaration should be issued. Respectfully s4mitted, LBH. K•jaa Attachments: Map City Engineer's Report Initial Study Resolution Ll 11 U i. I-d 4e! lo I-d � §&$ \� <§ � � )� �\ §� A( I ��- � /| 3k CD/ 29 CL k 2� ■ k � r u L -r -- - i JL�__ pR SECT �i- -i -- SITE P.N. 7864 crsre title; cNo —�'`�, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAtiIONGA P.M. 7864 ENGINEERING, DIVISION �T VICINITY MAP 1 � a e P S CITY OF RANCHC CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SF.EET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff" will prepare Part T -I of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meating at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Decla5:at ion will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or :i) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further infofma- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Cucamonga Wiaery Company (Tent. P_11. 7864) APPLICANT`S NFSQE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Mr. Pierre Biane _ 10013 Eighth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730, (714) 980 -904 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERP.ING TEIS PROJECT: Mr. Robert Mim .Mack of George 1%. Mim Mack, Consulting Civil Engineer 214 South Euclid Avenue, Ontario, Ca. 91761 (714) 983 -0439 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL. NO.1 10013 Eight`: Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Assessor's Parcel No. 209 - 201 -08, 11 -13, 16 -17 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:_ None I-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION �i DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Parcel man_snlittina easterlv 4.5 acres of existina winery oronerty for ..sale to vinecar processing firm No new construction of buildiras is proposed ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING A:tD PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Total Site = 14.9 acres Pronged pujidinus Existing Buildings = 156,250 s DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLAITS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURP.L, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING-PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) EA Is the project of cumulative may as a whole 0- part of a larger project, one of a series actions, which although individually small, have significant enviro=ental impact? I -2 1 LJ 11 11 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO _ X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contor.rs? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noisrt or vibration? _ * 3. Create a substantial change in demand "for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? * 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan_ designations? S. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPOQ -TANT: - ?f the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation - to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information preser_ted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional inforr:iation may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Comaittee. �' - �y� Date Sent_ 9. 198? Signature Jc - " _ 7 __ Title Froiect Engin:�er I -3 :RESIDENTIAL :.JNSTRUCTION T follocaing information should be Cucamonga 0 Planning Division in order to aiz in assessing the ea;ilityxo£a the oschool district to accommodate the proposed res?.dential development. Na--e of Devaloper and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location. of Project: 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multinle family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: I. Earliest date of occupancy: Model # and x of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price e Range PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTTT• I I -4 40 RESOLUTION NO. f A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAA?1INv COMMISSION Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7864 (TENTATIVE PARCEL 14AP NO. 7864), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 8TH STREET AND TURNER AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Neer 7864, submitted by P. Pierce Blane and consisting of 3 parcels, located at the southwest corner of 8th otreet and Turner Avenue, being a division of a portion of Lot 3 and 4, Section 14, Towship 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian as recorded in Book 44 of Naps, Page 9, Records of Saa, Bernardino County; and WHEREAS, on September 14, 1982, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on October 27, 1982, the Planning Commission held a duly adve.tlsed public hearing for the abova- described rap. FOLLOWS: NOW, THERREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMrNGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvEment of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plait. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will net cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse euvircnmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issr.ed on October 27, 1962. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7864 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: P. Pierre Biane TENTATIVE MAP NO. PM 7804 LOCATION: Snuthwo t corner of 8th Street and DATE FILED: 9!14/82 TjirnPr Ay-nu P N'U'MBER OF LOTS: 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lot 3 and 4, RECEIPT NUMBER: Section 14, T.I.S., R.7-W., S.B.B.M. as recorded FEE: X273.00 in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, Records of San Bernardino ZONE: Industrial Specific Plan un SubArea =5 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * s * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY:_ George MimMack GROSS ACREAGE: 14.87 ADDRESS. . 214 S. Euclid Avenue MINIMUM LOT AREA: Ontario, CA 91751 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * RECORD OWNER (S) ADDRESS PHONE P. Pierre Biane 10013 Eighth St. 714;980 -9040 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easem,ents as shown on the tentative map. V 2. Dedication by final map of the follow°.rg missing rights -of -way on the following streets: 11 additional feet on Turner Avenue additional feet on btn Street 1 " C ',c additional feet on - _ Corner P/L radius required on Other 3. i ghts of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: 4. :Street vacation required for: 5_ Master Plan of Streets revisicn recurred fcr: o_ The follcc_ring perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 Impro�ts 7 X g TENTATIVE 14AP tio. Z8.4 Page 2 {Bonding is required oriorto Recording G Building permit for_ T Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. - - -) sidewe Y one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets. Pavement, *onst%uct the following missing improvements on t includirg landscaping and irrigation on meter he rollowin o CURB g streets: irn.,. ? _ & ; A.C. ! �Inf_, nDivc ��.._� rrrr�, i WgLK AF ?R. i TREES LIGHTS ISLAND *1 OTF'.ER 8th Street X X 1 Y i^fMn or. A�enUe r j j X X 1 X X 1 _ g• Construe ' t all stjrm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative P, or as requ -red by the City Engineer. X I()- Provide all utility services to each lot including electric power, gas, telephone and cable televisianscondu t.s A77sutW7ities are to be �ndergroend. 17. Developer :-hall coordinate, and where necessary any power doles or other existing , Pay for the relocation of IZ. Insta ?1 appropriate 9 Public utilities as necessary, ^eet name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. X ?3- Developer is to Provide all construction Plans for drainage and street im- X provements- Such plans shall meet approval of the City _ 14 Dastract standards,ivater syste,s shall be designed to Cucamonga Engineer. A letter of acceptance is required, County Water X 1$- Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern 16. TCalifornia Edison Company and the City of Rzncho Cucamonga shall be decorative heefollowingdex i existing streets being torn u by A.C. overlay: P new services will require an 17. widths) f� are n t approved: c dimensions, i.e., cu, -de -sac radius, street section are noi. approved: —_ 18. The .p owing existin They will require: 9 streets are substandard: _- Aoorovals and Fees lg- This subdivision shall be subj X County 20• ect to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ San Bernardino Flood Control District. Approvals have not been secure f ties involved. d rom all uti Approval lities and other interested ager.- of the final map will be requirements that may be received from them, subject to any q ements RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP P;O. '7364 Page 3 21. Permiits from other .3encies will to required as follows: _ A. Caltrars, for: _ B. City: C. County Dust Abatement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep: E. Cucamonga County Water District: — — F_ Otter: Mae Control 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: _ 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way line in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located _ 26. The boundary c,f the Tentative Map needs clarification as :ollows: 27. the border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. 0 Parcel tsar' Waives 28. I-fornation submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to reeuirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. RkaaaX =X %rak (Bonding is required prior to E3 Recording f ,)r ) rainage p Building permit for ) _ 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Tnsurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the previsions of that pro;ram and Ordinance No. 24. 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the er ire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" wails shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns- 3 2. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations: 33. Broad scale hydrologic stucies wi,I I be requirree to assess impact or increased runoff. X 34. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on said map. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP N0. 7864 Page 4 Miscellaneous 1— a— neous 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of tie grading permit for this project. 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. _ 37. This property is not within the present City aoundary and will require annexation. 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: _ 39. Proper �radieg a ^.d conirai, including the preventation of sedir,.enta- tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. _ 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. X 47. The filing of the tentative map or approval of sane does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be X 42. The City sEngineer eshal�,� make rthe � determination, ind accordance gwith Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Flap Act, that division and development of tt,e property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the sign* ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the fin map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- X tion within the specified time limits of said Section. _ 43. At the time of Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), coptes of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie dotes and bench marks referenced. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots frontin on a s n a street shall us common drive a p c As pt i t ]in s X 45. The air nment o 4 street s storm arai:a pipe acros H Ifreet coontlg"IM to this site must be determined. If this existing pipe runs through the site, an easement for said storm drain shall be dedicated to the City and delineated on the map. Buildinq Division Requirements X Building exceeding 17,250 sq. ft. and having a surrounding clearance of less than 60 feet dimension must be made to comriy with the Uniform Building Cope requirements in order tz) continue with winery use. This 60 foot clearance X may be obtained by a yard agreement to which the City it a part. 2. Utility lines (water, gas, electricity, sewer and disposal systems) serving buildings other than those on the same parcel, are to relocated or abandoned in an approved manner. X 3. Sewage disposal facilities are to be located and shown on parcel map. RICE 20 LLOYD S. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER by: 11 0 .1 El CITY OF 1U CHO CUCAbSONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 27, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rink Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner c,iBL_rT; cut/ TRACT 12090. - PROPERHU) - the total a¢ve.upment of !46 townhouse units on 9.2 acres of land in the R -3 /PD (Multiple Family /Planned Development) zone located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Feron Boulevard - APN 209 - 051 -01. Related File: PD 81 -13 PR0.3ECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: On December 9, 1981, the Planning ommission approved a subdivision of the same number, Tentative Tract 12090, for 128 condominiim units at the same location. The applicant is now requesting approval of a 128 townhouse unit project located at the northeast corner of Archibald and Feron (Exhibit "A "). Although the project is located outside the Redevelopment Project area, the developer intends to make the units affordable and is seeking Agency and /or City assistance. The proposed project density of 13.9 du /ac is consistent with the existing R -3 /FD zoning and General Plan land use designation of Medium Residential 4.4 -14 du /ac). The property presently contains two residences, which the developer plans to demolish. The prope -ty slopes from the north to the south at approximately one and one -half percent. Tht� site is currently rough graded with no substantial ground cover other than indigenous weeds. Approximately thirty trees are located near the two residences and along Feron Boulevard. These trees are in generally poor condition and the developer intends to remove them. The project site is bounded on the north by Cucamonga Elementary School, or the west and south by existing single family residences, and on the east by commercial and industrial uses, as shown on the Site Utilization Map, Exhibit "B ". ANALYSIS: The project has been reviewed by the Design Review, Growth Management, and Grading Committees. All of the issues and concerns of these committees are reflected on the attached tentative tract Trap (Exhibit ''C "), development plans, and recommended conditions of approval. This project has been designed with a private street system that will connect with Archibald and Feron as shown on the Detailed Site Plan, Exhibit "D ". The applicant has been encouraged to contact the school district regarding a combined access roao that would align with 9th Street. The off -site drainage map, Exhibit "I ", supplied by the applicant, indicates that runoff from this project wilt be directed onto Archibald Avenue and Reid Street to the south. ITEM F Tentative Tract 12090 /USA Properties Planning Commission Agenda October 27, 198 2 Page 2 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE: The Committee has worked with the applicant in resolving concerns relative to piasing, recreational space, and interior circulation. Therefore, the Design Review Committee recommends approval of this project. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part 11 of the Initial Study and found that this project will net have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. FACTS FOR F? 'ING: The subdivision map has been prepared in accordance with City standards and policies and the project site is suitable for the proposed subdivision. The project design is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was published in The Daily Report newspaper and approximately 56 public hearing notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. In addition, the applicant has presented this project to the Citizen Participation Advisory Committee and surrounding property owners and received a favorable response. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: ?t is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a pub,.c hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval, the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectful bmi tied, RICK G City Planner RG:DC:jr Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exnibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit E.xh4bit Exhibit Initial Resolut "A" - Location Map "B" - Site Utilization Map "C" - Subdivision Map /Phasing Plan "D" - Detailed Site Plan "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan "F" - Elevations "G" - Floor Plans "H" - Grading Plat, "I" - Off -Site Drainage Map Study, Part I ion of Approval with Conditions Poo r °'w r "i► . L.K { �J l = .ft I WE a i 4 -+ �`r.� ' '� ry. � _ Vii` '. I �` ti o • _ w 7a zl .41 IV . a, �, l� fi.J �, t-�.r �i'l: .��7•\V' r 'i'i. +�t�* � �rf:.:,�j �� l -1 �. �r t - l - y �}�~ �' •,�/.��, � Jul.. �� '.��.' 3- r �Ty,j, ' N`�y.- S , ■ a � 4 s 'r ,I 1 I ARMS AVE 7-fpIc L Si TICM5 V V t. :` R1H t CITY OF ME A: RANCHO CLGkN'I0-NGA T(T[ E: �i�.� & P1. .AWING DlN SIO.N' EXHIBM SckUr ••® I Tit �—L-, I =1EQ4:: fit ��- fl- JZ7; Iry WAic re L U m j/ fr I T I T I—, L -mm- Fuotv L r el Tq� I" sy IF CITY OF RANCHO E.%1: 9 &2 no " CUCATMONGA rr TrrLE- sl!& PLOW- PLAINNING DINISON Emma. E2 scAL.E: (rte F Uwr CoLpff 41 PAWJM NORTH CITY OF RANCHO E.%1: 9 &2 no " CUCATMONGA rr TrrLE- sl!& PLOW- PLAINNING DINISON Emma. E2 scAL.E: _i mi" Zing; 'n.'FLt -✓ a -n I Y T'tvy'_ �VKN WD!� �A- rr:,G✓ 6d CITY OF TE.',i= 01r iaz0go RANCHO CUCAIrION:GA TrrLE= 4L PLANNING DIViS \l F- miIi3-n- de C a F 6 StDE C SIDE CITY OF RA INCHO CUCA IONGA FLANNIING DIXISUN Y { \ l: T 9 O/ ® i i/ TTru: isi+s1 ra4 EYFil r- _ SCALE: C V N'ORTTi E 3 E E- CITE' OF RANCHO CUCANNIONGA PLAINNI ItI DIV IS AN �_;& - • Am a �J 1 fk3+fr^' - I 9Y1BR BR SECOND FLOOR FRS7 FLOOR A 26R1vz9A 997 SF �.I y NBR BB SECOND FLOOR . XM FLOOR B 2 SR 1 vz RA 1070 6F L MWB 0 6m• SEC9%40 FL 10R FRST FLOOR C. . BR l z,a OA 1216 SF —..y ..ea CITY (-NAF ITEM: PLANNING DIVISI N EXHW- Zw t-- SCALE mm=° 11 1. E Ii GFGErA/O <�-- E�i5TiN6 �'k'A /NAME CouRSE •� p/?OFOSED O.P.$ ; / /FGE lavCE.vT.QATDr�/ fo %�f oFF - -SITE � DN-S /TE L/'•s.✓+Atg APE•OS 22 17�h;NAGE A2s1 ��,G��s� CITY OF R_.� \.CHO CL'CANIa \GA PL-,LNNING DiVNON., UA N X)RTH n E%1: T(TLE: O�MIA&ff MAP EXHIBIT': Z sci .E: a" CITY OF RANCHC CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFOP- MATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: 537.00 El For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department. where the prOj °ct application is made. Upon recept of this application, the Environmental nzalysis staff will prepare part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three deter:dnations: 1) The project will have no sign! £ican t environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project. will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: RANCHO CUCAMOIQGA CONDOMINIUMS APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TEL PHONE:USA PROPERTIES P.O.Box 2165. Santa Monica. Califo =ia 90406 (213) 453-331 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Surinder S. Kahlon (Vice - President, Development P.O. Box 2165. Santa Monica. Cal' rnia 90406 (213) 453 -3311 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL. NO.) N.E. Corner Archibald and Feron - Ranchcs Cucamonga LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None known. - -- I] I -1 E PrOJECi DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Development of 12$ planned units SQUARE FOOTAGE OF on 5.2 acres located. on U e N.E. corner o Arc.i an eron, yielazig a densit - of 1 .9 units Der acre. The project will e comprise of "+_erent townhouse Iloorpians, 96 2-beri om units an 3-bedroom ACF.EP_GE OF PROJECT AREA AND. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND A OPCS=J p VILr L I TGS y 1S 9-2 ur r4i, E6QL.g square rW _ -.6_G - I1Qnt• Proposed square footage - 1 42,2 DESCRi:3E THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), Ai`1IMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF Si3RROL'NDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACK NECESSARY SHEETS): The project site is currently rough graded with no substantial ground_ cover s weeas. across cover over the nioeline is recuire, by the Gas Co. -1-nere are some ota trees trees have not been maintained anct are in poor conaition: in some instances Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually smal', may as a whole have significant environmental inroad? None I -2 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in exi_tina noise or vibration? - X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fi ^e, �ratcr, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flarm:ables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: The existing trees located oil-site have not been maintained and are in detenoratinz c_O__n_c_1MonH root structures do not make the existing trees good candidates for saving. IM2CRUMT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICP.TION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information_ required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an. adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Commttee. Date c9,07- cfZ Signature 'ZLr kia4" Surin er Kahlon Title Vice - President, 1-3 RESiDEN;IAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: USA Properties Fur_d Specific Location of Project: N.E. Corner of Archibald 8 Feron PHASE I PHASE 2 PF._ASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL i. Number of single fr.ni.ly units: 35 27 34 32 128 2. Number cf multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: �. Earliest date of occupancy: Model 4 and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range A -2 Br 69,500 B -2 Br 73,500 C -3 Br 79.508 11 f1 r,: 1115183 6,30/83 1213l/83 6,30/83 12/31/83 6/30/84 6/30184 12/30/84 12 10 13 13 48 15 9 13 11 48 8 8 8 8 32 I -4 i �• r, „ _r L r7 ry / ti 0) 11 RESOLUTION NO. * A R.ESOLUIION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12090 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12090, hereinafter "Map" submitted b:o USA Properties Fund, Ltd., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential development of 128 townhouse dwellings on 9.6 acres of land, located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Feron Boulevard into 145 lots, regularly came before the Plane'., Commission for public hearing and action on October 27, 1982; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Panning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION is The Planning Comnission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12090 and the Map thereon": (a) The tentative tract_ is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically s+iitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is isstied. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract flap No. 12090, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative .ri li vdi'r'7sion map i5 not approved and recorded within twenty -four (24) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. 2. Upon recordation of the attached tentative subdivision map, Planning Commission Resolution No. 81 -145 shall become null and void. 3. The perimeter wall and fencing on all four sides of the project shall be complzted and fully landscaped with the construction of the first phase of this project. The final design shall be submitted with the landscape and irrigation plans prior to issuance of building permits and shall be subject to review and approval of the planning Division. 4. The perimeter wrought iron fence facing Archibald and Feron shall be redesigned to provide a variety of setbacks; however, in no case shall said fence be located within the public right -of -way. The sidewalk and mounding shall be redesigned to provide gently rolling mounds. 5. The developer shall contact all property owners alcng the east project boundary to coordinate the construction of the block wall with the removal of existing fences. 6. Shrubs shall be planted unaerneath trees to form a dense landscape sfreen along the north and east project boundary. 7. An improved tot lot s ;call be provided in the center of the project. The tot lot shall be enclosed by a fence, shrubbery, or other physical form and must include an active play are_ for children. The final design shall be submitted with the landscape and irrigation plans subject to Planning Division approval. 8. A main address directory of residents shall be placed at the main entrance to the development. 9. Sidewalks across the driveways shall be designed to clearly indicate a pedestrian crossing. 10. The roof of the carports shall be roofed with material of earth tone colors and is subject to review and approval by the 3. Necessary approval and permits from Southern California Gas Company for the construction on their easement area shall be required prior to recordation of the map. 4. The developer is advised to contact the school district to provide for a joint use driveway access onto Archibald Avenue. 5. The developer shall install full street improvements along Archibald Avenue and Feron Boulevard, including the interior loop street with the first phase construction. 6. The interior loop street shall be designed per City standards as approved by the City Engineer and shall be subject to the City's plan check and inspection requirements including payments of all necessary plan check and inspection fees. 0 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS * DAY OF *, 19 *. Planning Division prior to issuance of building permit. 11. The applicant is encouraged to investigate the use of anti - graffiti material for use on proposed walls. 12. The Covenants, Codes and Restrictions shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and shall include provisions for the homeowners to be responsible for maintenance of walls and removal of graffito. In addition, provisions shall be made to ensure that the maintenance of dense landscaping be kept dense and not triimned up. 13. The parking lot at the northeast corner of the project shall be lighted for security. Shielding shall be provided to prevent glare on adjacent residences. 14. Security gates shall be provided at the project entrances to be approved by the Sheriff's Department and Foothill Fire District. 15. The easterly and northerly project boundaries shall be planted with continuous densely landscaped buffer. 16. Parking lot trees shall be planted in all planters within parking areas and adjacent to carports. ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. The developer shall redesign the access on Archibald Avenue to provide for a "right turn only" exit from the project, unless developer aligns the driveway access with 9th Street. 2. Drainage flows from the major portion of the drainage area "E ", as shown on the Hydrology Map, shall be conveyed to Archibald Avenue along Feron Boulevard. The balance of the drainage shall be directed towards Reid Avenue. 3. Necessary approval and permits from Southern California Gas Company for the construction on their easement area shall be required prior to recordation of the map. 4. The developer is advised to contact the school district to provide for a joint use driveway access onto Archibald Avenue. 5. The developer shall install full street improvements along Archibald Avenue and Feron Boulevard, including the interior loop street with the first phase construction. 6. The interior loop street shall be designed per City standards as approved by the City Engineer and shall be subject to the City's plan check and inspection requirements including payments of all necessary plan check and inspection fees. 0 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS * DAY OF *, 19 *. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission 1, jACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the on tthef Rancho Cur_ame #ga, at z regular meeting of the Planning Commission * 9 *, 19*, by the following vote- to- t-,it: held AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS• ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L 0 rV e _ O G M 1 O [. O y L «� _ r •V 1J. 9 Y C V. Cy 9m O •'_ = � � � "' qq J.e> O wtn ^° � d °_fir ,°�' .',. v «a Mohr L:2 c o _ J E G l P. v � �. ✓ ° a_ ._✓, l -• o .. L ^' o o .20 a ` rno° L _'' .°. u u v pr. «oL ° c.0 �` °wL. `a F c 10 a N _ c 1.J avQ'r9 r _^ �C C •� •�ql �L, W ovu c^ ,u c� f_ .rr 4 ru G C r O d d _ _A r J y y C 9 C t 4 c 4 •. N V d q F 2V •pL " 9 v �� !n NO y a d rv6 -`O JL u� 6 nJOr L 7C � 7.w qy •n N �'L v>ru i °a °�°'N o'i Vic. J. d N c�.Lr c >° -�o�� •u• c`n. ^ _ V Gy -71 ' C N C ^! yrd :';Z75 Lr� vP J O rr4° �'O uPEdr u rvG lC� �991q. 4o ^ �� y m V V O M V G L..L.. y •' � IrNj ✓ w m C V q T P O L P O r u i N C d E a � '� G NY. vLp VO^ as OC rC 00 N_C o6 O O4pL l 9L. LPL Cq 4 VL °'� NLrp VC a it � JyNV 7 Pq"•V Nd C l qr u Puoo i' + c �� C u C O W G 9 c' °� L '• 9 O VT O J O N E 4: 9 �. C O v F� V r rLr ^ dJ C y9...`Y 97 �N i9 >rui•V y_ .��. L .2.2 Z L N rC NqE L N2J O �U J «� V9VV y 9qv O aVS yy`°r I 9 J .� c O y y •� >.O O u y C t r N y C V T �J O a 4� P.Lrr u r 2 O O N C 9 y r L C C C d 9 O G C C yF 0= a =q 9 L JQ 9L Gd �9 ` L �4ty = O ^ O 9 r O 4 P�vO J N� r-. ^ i^ L u N N y✓. W �uVE p •' > I 9 P CW _ � C J 9 Y G M y NG• Q9 r/°i0 N 6N W +LS oN F-Z SV y�u 9Ly r � L�J` CuOVO LI rP ^ LVLr ^ 6 r Iz N 1V N N H N C =O 0 O Z C 9 V 9 r N G v O E W H V GF 14! u0 q`y Cn gjrr- qy `� rC°C� � C Nd� r 3 `P c °.. W N fiq 4 c c ye° ria. s^ J ✓ ° r P u "' c aMC �° vi°ce °` �o i.. ^° u L� L„ = O j O CO =n jre �r �V° �rC >F 06 SC..L a. d - P yVVOO Nu � N •n C `o °� °4 u c "r = a o ale v e N • � L l � a. V. 7 E 6 y �IT1 V L >O Cd Ls(' V 9Pi OG cOQ Or •nom P.�C� G^ 9 cZ-r L' p7 ��- APO 9 W L LO a G q L 4 r G ]�^ V 0 L•L.r^ c 4 ^r f J <rr �¢ ►- � . ->.Ji. 4� 6�s u�� > 4mJ 60NN <w �.L.� V V yr ° b M N n V N 0; XC6 rV -�plt 1 J�j1 I 1 1 ^� m � a � `I K� I rY C� w = d F V yn E a,o 4 r c O � V L ^ L q tl c 4 =u » q•u q »° 9 L _C•+ r VS p r•O r^ d E b c J vT C O r•N `V _ V •.. T. u « L� U •• 9 � d l r, Jt —c c L. L ry b � R O q o .`• S •Vi. .L... 9 E °� 6 L A » L O a L N ^ C _ o E 2 r M G` q » ? V E •Nir V Pa O O C •• ' r/' d p �- 4� V .LO krC t tr � W � E° C r_LO w" vop `i G`q V •� G p = L L >. N N u L rn V q C G V L 2» y V L L T O r t P N O L ••E° L L d. « ay vyrn cqr oo >o C +per _ � L OC � � _ C V q V N tp •r0 » ' 2 >r V •.r � V ^ fC• j •.n V L P �• C V G N Y u u C» O C E L O q IV °�w sc N°rpV° er NLq "C1 P - � N O q •� E Ou VV•• c c _- TLTGLVEO V - tic b` q »� Qa l' O C N yV c N= G' •'rV— On •. C! .=r• c »•. d �r q » V � » O G S M Q H C N >.... J m� •y { G.rL + 1 of ^+ xif x� X o W -�plt 1 J�j1 I 1 1 ^� m � a � `I K� • rY C� w = r o F V yn E a,o 4 r c O � V L ^ L q tl `V » q•u q »° 9 L _C•+ r VS p r•O r^ d E b c J vT C O r•N `V _ V •.. T. u « L� U •• 9 � d l r, b � R C r y q o .`• y � » L O a L N ^ o E 2 r M G` q » ? V E •Nir V Pa O O �- L t OLr 6 IEO E° C r_LO C O 2 _ •� G p u L L >. N N u L rn V q C G V L 2» y V -q' c ( «L vyrn cqr oo >o C +per _ � L OC � � _ C V q V N tp •r0 » ' 2 >r V •.r � V ^ fC• j •.n V L P �• C V G N Y u u C» O C E L O q IV sc - N V P l:_ � N O q •� E Ou VV•• L 4` N G. TLTGLVEO V V b` q »� Qa -�plt 1 J�j1 I 1 1 ^� m � a � `I K� • rY C� o V b b V O C C O G E ruv N � •t q O i •n •ac -cis. + m c a P o y^ E F c 4 cv Cd L q L v p 2 C« c S L d G > V O «G•+ cc �qP •rr M E V O'• C 4 l T 9 ucrr m..rP L IGIL Lr•—p -uc d W V V Pr•O•r !p 1 O C P t 2f ` « N « f K� � Y •Gi• E` N! T u N T tl N Z C r° V p N �Vd Oy 4L l�Lr`•bb«C C•yU 6 C N� ` F . b -b ° L g V G y 2 T •'rG l 4 Vtly —yG V E<�` N-m-b r`r »O GL �q 4•° y.�` _ckV qV d L •' O q tl O r�VK L� �5�r VVOLN \E ��N.,Oy �V _C V V V S P N T V° •.n O t= N J! i O'O q- _ 9L �E„ Q L4J+ Ov1 V ^� CV ry '. O• VV tl OiO qV L J`L L _ C 6 c V _L O V J r C 9 L q .�•• CPq JU° E LN P_CVE >• Liy >L .• E O u � °� C• C G_ __ _V L C r r Y V« NqV Q »P QO T. PGN M k� OL �•OL C L C L � � N "I "I X1 mi N u E rY o yn »n a,o 4 4c V T. u « L� U •• 9 � d l r, LE o �- L t OLr 6 IEO J r_LO »t -q' c ( «L vyrn cqr oo >o C +per _ � L OC � � _ C V q V N tp •r0 » ' _ y O` L N i» U IV O q •� E Ou VV•• L 4` N G. TLTGLVEO V V b` q O J V P l' O C N yV c N= - i •V O L O C! .=r• d �r j V � { ri + 1 b b V O C C O G E ruv N � •t q O i •n •ac -cis. + m c a P o y^ E F c 4 cv Cd L q L v p 2 C« c S L d G > V O «G•+ cc �qP •rr M E V O'• C 4 l T 9 ucrr m..rP L IGIL Lr•—p -uc d W V V Pr•O•r !p 1 O C P t 2f ` « N « f K� � Y •Gi• E` N! T u N T tl N Z C r° V p N �Vd Oy 4L l�Lr`•bb«C C•yU 6 C N� ` F . b -b ° L g V G y 2 T •'rG l 4 Vtly —yG V E<�` N-m-b r`r »O GL �q 4•° y.�` _ckV qV d L •' O q tl O r�VK L� �5�r VVOLN \E ��N.,Oy �V _C V V V S P N T V° •.n O t= N J! i O'O q- _ 9L �E„ Q L4J+ Ov1 V ^� CV ry '. O• VV tl OiO qV L J`L L _ C 6 c V _L O V J r C 9 L q .�•• CPq JU° E LN P_CVE >• Liy >L .• E O u � °� C• C G_ __ _V L C r r Y V« NqV Q »P QO T. PGN M k� OL �•OL C L C L � � N "I "I X1 mi N u E Ch ENO `` T. O yV� •• VP SqC Jd CCL P L C•°°e L r V P. r� VU�C — V Ny O G P6 C VN. ^q t • o -., a .T >, i t �n ��✓. °.cn a°. " -L b N o - H _ d o � `LJ 1 S C•'V-' P�q N�� C —C q qHL Y ✓O V O r= .^ C � r � I C w Su y � W n O r ^ d V• J ° I � ^• O C — � L L U •e P N N ! � L L N 1 S l am _ y GCO V � •eP �Lr VwN rT= rIL Cm ` PL •.r' r - Ad h VyS: C••Cn �' r w SC L uV0 qNV V r N q q L H rr N r L O ti u n `• O C V w V O C L. y Lo cr c(.� t N � V wnr N-`•n TL i •°.1 a o° - q.:'C '.` L e iN�_ n c c I YN ww. ` fir^. U Eq VoU L C ��V � +O qG7 �- ✓.aJ MV Vw..r L r 4S L NZ qL YV•r r CAL Oar O` V dl r V Y O V q` VC9L 1q {_ N •�iLO ^^ L _ _ LC I G V C l L V (• ^J •` > y L \ +� t r _ n V '. 6d rw Lw� •� �q0 NW ��<_ � O`V ��•Li.V�_•r >.w _ S G4 _Y VY GO -t a. .1 C C90 o YO ar CO. �{Vr nq Y Ly9 P6yur 6�n T.^ « L Lu OL LCY •e'O rj!> NN.CnySP GV L u`• Vq PVO \rJi �'+ CVEIY =>p� D L u WI I J L r� q V r 6 .. � r �� LO q u it — O H O W .• w V n CO -'�lP C7 qCC •rr•O•Sn `� C>G. iJ V V V q-V+ P. L -'H VA C V P' E 'SP�� V N •^ q �� G. OL U `M1J T' V ^' �� ray <i _ L.� L cad v •O N o°V .�.. r LH � d V-°-r C.�°.LUy `^O r0 •y ? Cln.. V NGO O N � O r .Z V JOL �Hr a ^PVgQ v ' .pq = O .nN —q n� V O r V p> l L ..• G •L q� K N O a N •O r r G �� u ^° � •.> o r L` <.n <� '- t_.t .Or. G v y % 2 c` E � G •' o G I ° V � U GN 1 u �I XI I X I I XI r __ •�-Or G � r O C O � N � q ` i' Y• M L 6 l° M1A q C r C u .� C V � L L q � F y— i f _V z 1 Nr0 L.vL —u �CJS Ov— Oar _ C H 6�•0'< Lr =V�V °`� •n u r ^ 7V 4L qS V7y V•�.d N4TC° VS +i ('o.^V T4 �P rr �eL�y+ —V r � ^VU LVESV SV L�_ + r P L yC —u ✓CP ^.+p Z jOS V�6 - ` T P= r '� +' r C •- V ^ •.—'1 V L- C L r ` C q ` N V O C �' ... q O V u Lam. q Y V N n• q V P S q �[ i v ruC >qa ¢ _ CiL. -•� r�qd r. OdV LvC L�...VWN `C L6VC H L VF HV rA 4� .ji vVLOLGJSC 'LrL °� VrC W�N�V ��J V C•C V� PT n —w +LTG Y�•rH O" V ^.V V4 VNq � + Pl >w. �O ON^ C C CCIr lya V NPa Lr rrJ GL p \^ CS C (L�9 O. _r> H ao •L � O O J r a C W Y P O O ". y V a c E �� << F_-C u L j C 9 C 6 q O J Y r ^VN C 1��r N�q ilJ[i 4P:V r J ..j O —V a: .^ +I H.°i� ro- 6N °O _ s �q ✓N L..v u`cu -w' Wr `L`.• t�5 L. a tiM oo •i ^ r P o C C r r G 9 q— V— .^ V= O i j C r a O �' i v V N C O q— G q 0, 0 a J��u rqc� ° �- �` e`^°e� a Lt�N ^\`c ..• M'v ..� c c Lu uc r N_ CL O VV L�O> G O�•J bu {] S n rO —d LL�C GOV arV OG 6r� >`CTJ __r0 Lr wO m —N rr.nr OV � r_L r_rN �r •^ C-J ' S C O Ow —nr Cgrr CC _r !u• SG � OC q UU w e qN .-.^ C^rr ` G, L C L N v t c r L V q N V .G N q t y u — i c d u•.� ? °� ^r �. -_'r r o••r .. -t... `.uw .. �q` qM; co `�`. C L� r •J T. Z..• y +L. .. C V u N.nc `n +y o� l r .u. N` L G �> �"n �y -� d:cu: •'.g.= O _> L V r `6 -.cc �.> - _ v^ d -` W uy �:.L C .• .. cnc V .°+ U L.'•r V — cw o'er° c == �r .°•� N c - un v °1.-'' Ues °` i c � s L prLC -q' Ary> _ NrL: oCi< .o. - a ♦r� jL d N• � ° LyL ° +n '• rI V n + �� U✓ - O N M J G O V C C^ I n` Z G+ L C F u y .n O t .� J• r V C C O q Y• \> W L L {' ti L V n a O d V .-. ` r Y r, 4t L r r L u �• N _ ^DSO ^'u LV WV N > N N N V � 42in ', J0 VwL L09rV 6C l' GC —C N C t LO rl L-V �✓ > O i WA°• W ipJ f XI XI XJ r V Ch s Y ° ✓ 3 •O, V '� NF w 11 , ✓ « y C •°..L � O L y`•y0 C .CL Lr "C N c a •� 1 rc" �✓ ry y I a.Q }F o uv rho P y� q,,.� ° zz O r <..' � C b o' .- ` v -Vi u n L c .° a ^ V rn•E ^J C O C� f• ✓ i ` y ' L M I c c �. _ _ G° _V < C c m V w' i v d C 1 `� o v:? � pL c I 22r y h c^ =c u � o � uc° ✓ r'° '✓•' ^. •qVb .°, O 4 Ou `t lV b U.Jn� by ny ✓ ✓� dr .`C V« I � LV � - J w .`. �-' pc n d ° -r ! i ``•' t, ` yy `�' as °. ,^coq °o � i �i � of � ii •� -✓ .c. av ri � °i o .._ 5 -__ a ✓oi rl�_ou '° oq ail mn _ in ._a I _ � uc a ciia Sc q G a G « T d C �� ✓ r w ✓ � L q i r u V I V q O L = V V G O r n+ G a a C ." d N V ° u r l ✓ _ N N✓ 4 r N l u G✓ _ .J.. � •, 9 r r °✓ •r C w n C C y« � C v— C L p � ._ aJ r q V �' O ✓+ Y_ C T _ l q ` � q° I V� + •i C i? q N •r � q 0 c O G _ 4P> S« C Cr ✓° O J ••v C L✓« i_ `. ^ v t1q i 9 I �° q q a J �� .� 6^ 6 q 4. v d G `� •O.. V _ C ` w y Q 34 V° • q ��V OW ✓L •.} �� 1. .. 4V t° 4E °Oi N l ✓if •Y t G:. J G.C. Y C �J✓ ✓ ` V I W 4J G ^ uCi O u VC itr° y ✓ ✓ u I w>•r G L W�� .k I >••� n a a _ q C V o. L �(• •� Ic. I I it N.` J � I s ° L c . P L ° � 'n `O b - ^ • rP-°i °`fir P_N F - y �C � — « + L `o_ ° cc °ra . ✓✓ L Nyc.+ w —�� Non' Y� ✓.. ¢� ..'^ O PV OI ViV ` •l d a V_ r Ijj W U d C V J L ° G n L L +° •`.r •� Z C q O '• O J C n1 U T -J V •rrGd g •.° C� W � �6 «C a ,`� •O. `L• .ii• ° ^•L.• .J..L J =w ` X XI I VV� L .� Lau • C v L « ✓ r q ✓ b d O Y � � � i' .... +O' w O ✓ M C j V r l >O N ✓ I+I y i t V •, •, ` ✓ d � _ p+ Y CC JL Sl 1 N ✓�•O.. rL�V C.O.r`> +o «.vW G • r C`) by `✓yp °ZC' ri VY •L,° �° ✓«= CV � W r U nC a� �Cuwd -. •r• C r°C VL k '•O• L Y a a '6T —.O- 0 V✓ Q ✓_ q y �• w a i 2 r.r :• y. u[ — 0. O p U E �� e1 O a v '�'� c c O q •+ _ w L r � l— O �/ `- r 1 C •I...l V .O n y" 6 p r •n L CO � u O = C w I a q o° __ C ` � - ' E G X C q C.,J. w t C I ° �.• V P q J G_ V N [1w V W I u°lw �— ✓r « G dVP ✓,O ^� ✓ �dV '� q •n ++ d' Ga ?q Y .°.. °CF4 •°.. r_L _Tr v'9 of .`.Q' ,�' � I i�•c°- °a L «�. :: ooc jL o �v baL ' "� r Iv❑ f O cv uc ° - u X .°I .L :co -° y ---2, �c� +G cw° `%� `•-°� �� « a I 1 °ygb`r icra`y uc+ p p°l v° 3 Jr r q�' °� iL -O +_ ✓ pV «o _iL ✓� w.°+ w OS ✓W I I QIC =L •V.�° u0,° FJL ✓.°.r I -«•n N p +b C ✓.O ✓C d y 4 i ✓ r O q� r G C ^� •V V p x. r b y 3 } L G .� � wV t, Cad C r t -`. r r+ a.l ." I T u S+Lr•V ✓[Y -. .. y a C � t� CV4 C V •a.. C C 1 Q P W j O _ C C. O C V ` b O w J v ptd n �L� V✓ -•L, w {.. ^i ° P« Q y u_ i r J I ~ ^ Y Xi I i� 1 1 'G m a✓ � C C RESOLUTION 82 -98 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78 -03 FOR BAR AND ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES WITHIN THE SOA.R'S HEAD ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED IN THE RANCHO PLAZA IN THE C -1 ZONE WHEREAS, on thm 22nd day of September, 1982, the Planning Commission determined the need to suspend Conditional Use Permit 78 -03 and to conduct a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, on the 27th day of October, 1982, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above item. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolves as follows: SECTION 1: Additional conditions and changes are found to be needed for Conditional Use Permit 78 -03 in order to mitigate the past disturbances and bring the use in accord with the intent and purpose of the neighborhood shopping district. Therefore, the following conditions are added to those already in effect per Resolution 78 -40: 2. Periodic policing of the parking lot by the management of the business should be done on a nightly basis to assist in averting disturbances from patrons. 3. Block access to the northwest parking area from the main parking area by placing large trees and planters in the driveway. Additionally, a chain or breakaway barrier shall be used to block access to this area from the rear driveway during evening hours. 4. A sound attenuation wall shall be built on the three properties adjacent to the northwest parking area of the center. The precise heig;it, location and construction materials shall be determind through the development of a precise development plan, which shall be prepared by the shopping center owner and reviewed and approved by the City Planner. Such improvements shall consider the use of sound attenuation material as well as some additional landscaping between the new wall and the existing wall. The plans should be prepared as soon as possible and installatiion, with the cooperation of all property owners and before the January 26, 1982 meeting scheduled by the Commission. 5. Speed bumps shall be placed throughout the center. I r E J. REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 75-03 - BOAR'S HEAD Michael Fairin, Senior Plannc.-, reviewed the staff report and recommended that the Commission take public input on this item. Chairman King announced that the public was invited to comment. Mel Futrell, 662 Topaz, addressed the Commission_ stating that the block wall required at the previous meeting had beer_ worthwhile and the noise has been down approximately 90 percent. He attributed this decline in noise partly to the block wall, however stated that it could also be declining as it does in the winter months but increases in the summer. Mr. Futrell complimented Mr. Arcinage on his concern and efforts in working cut these problems. He further stated that the parking lot c.rner has not been completely closed off and people were still parking back there. He also stated that he hoped this problem would serve as an indication to the Commission what kinds of problems are associated with placing a use such as this in a residential area. Michael Vairin stated he would like to report what had been observed when the establishment was inspected prior to this evenin.g's meeting. He stated that the block wall requirement had been accomplished as well as the planters which were required and a chain on the north entrance which has also been put in place. Further, it was assumed that this chain is being put up during evening hours, which is the requirement of the condition. Doug Gorgen, 7333 Hellman, addressed the Commission stating that the reason the chain has not been put up is because a second tree still has to be put in place and reflectors have been ordered to be placed on the chain but have not yet arrived. Further, that he would not like to have a chain across that area without some type of reflectors because of liability. Further, that he had not observed cars parking in that area. Vice - Chairman Re=pel advised that phcsphorescent paint might be used in lieu of reflectors. Larry Arcinage addressed the Commission stating that he sent copies o1 letters distributed to his employees regarding the patrolling the P g eliminate noise and also to keep Boar's Head patrons from parking in the rear parking area. Further, that he would have no control over patrons of other establishments in the center. Commissior_er Stout stated that he was quite skeptical that Mr. Arcinage would be successful and complimented him and the shopping center owner on working out these problems with the members of the community. Planning Commission Minutes -15- January 26, 1953 L' J Commissior_er Barker expressed his appreciation for t1ie good faith Mr. Arcinage demonstrated in going about as far as any businessman could be expected to go to solve problems. a�ta a• H. PLANNED COMMUNITY 81 -01 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO%TANY - Review and final consideration of the Terra Vista Planned Community text and final Environmental Impact Report. The project consists of approximately 1300 acres and is bounded by Base Line avid Foothill Boulevard on the north and south, and by Pochester and Haven on the east and west. Michael irairin, Senior Plarr_er, reviewed the staff report to the Commissior stating that staff was seeking final cOmmenL from the Commission on the proposed planned community and a recommendation to the City Council dealing with the final certification of the EIR and the planned community text. Mr. Vairin further stated that an addendum had been prepared to this report Which stated that a reduction in the amount of parkland and greenways had taken place since the orignal plan, due to the applicant's use of the Foran Bill. The applicant had chosen_ to provide the minimum amount of parkland dedication of public open space. Further, the Commission originally spoke in terms of a 60-40 percent ratio split between_ public and private; however, under the provisions of the current plan (since the passage of the Foran Bill) the ratio of overall open space requiremant had been reduced to approximately 42 acres of public open space and 13 acres reserved for private, a ratio of 77 percent public and 23 percent private. Mr. Vairia requested the Commission make a specific recommendation in the Resolution to the City Council regardvig the parkland dedication issue. In regard to the Foran Bill, Mr. Vairin explained that the Bill states that "a planned development shall be eligible to receive credit "; however, the amount of credit is to be determined by the legislative body at the time specific development proposals are bei.- reviewed. Also, any other conditions the Commission wished c'ianged should be included in the Resolution. Crai -man King asked for the number of acreage which would be provided under the 77 percent to 23 percent ratio split. Mr. Vairin replied that it was 42.6 acres of public open space and 13.2 acres reserved for private in the form of credit for a total of 55.8 acres, the minim= amount according to the Foran Bill. He also explained that this figure was derived from the calculation of the estimated number of people contained in the planned community. Chairman King asked how many acres would be provided if the applicant chose to provide the minimum amount under the Foran Bill. M.r. Vairir replied tk:e minimum would be 55.8. 0 Planning Commission minutes -16- January 26, 1983 U E LJ C C PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting October 27, 1982 Chsi. man Jeff I {ing called the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, to order at 7:05 p.m. The meeting was held at the Lions Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman King then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: David Barker, Larry McNiel, He -mar. Rempel, Dennis Stout, Jeff king COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Rick Gomez, City Planner; Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Jack Lam, Community Development Director; Janice Reynolds, Secretary; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; and Michael Vairin, Senior Planner sssss CONSENT CALENDAR A. TINIE EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAPS 6863 AND 6726 Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Stout, unanimously carried, to adopt the Consent Calendar. sssa�r PUBLIC HEARINGS: B. CONSIDERATION OF REVOCATION OR MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 -BOARS EAD -This is a review o potential modifications to the Conditions of Approval, which are intended to resolve the complaints and disturbances created by this establishment. The business is within the Rancho Plaza located on the northwest corner of Carneliar. and 19th Street. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Jack Lam, Community Development Director, advised the Commission that the measures listed in the Staff Report were not intended to be all inclusive solutions to the problems; however, were intended to serve as a bas's on which the Commission could act. Chairman Bing opened the public hearing. Frank Britton, Attorney representing the aVvIicant, 399 W. Ilission, Pomona, California, addressed the Commission stating that most cf the conditions being placed on the establishment by the staff were meritorious, helpful and most of them highly approved by the ownership; however, the present ownership acquired the business oa June 15, 1982 and could not be responsible for problems which existed prior to that date. Further, that the applicant was not aware that the original Conditional Use Permit indicated that the establishment would be a full dinner house, however had purchased the business with that intention in mind and are now in the process of training personnel and working up a suitable menu. In response to the Planning condition regarding periodic policing of the outside area by security personnel, bii. Britton stated that this was already in effect. Also, a security guard had been placed by the front door who would be policing the outdoor area, seeing that all doors remain closed, verifying that no minors enter, and prohibiting any person coming into the establishment under the influence of alcohol. In response to condition number three regarding blocking the entire northwest corner of the parking lot, Mir. Britton stated that this had already been approved by both the owner of the center and the applicant. with regard to the condition requiring a five foot planter, he stated that this was something that would have to be accomplished with the owner of the center: however, suggested that the Commission might desire to wait and see if the blocking of the parking lot would alleviate the problem. The requirement for speedbumps had been approved by the owner of the center and Mr. Britton indicated that these would soon be installed. Further, that heavy insulation and stripping would be installed around the rear door in an effort to soften any sound escaping. Also, the applicant was agreeable to the condition requiring review at any time by the Commission.; however, the business could not continue to operate under the condition requiring a reduction in business hours. ® Chairman Ring asked Mr. Britton if he could give the Commission the percentage of business that is done between the h ^.us of 12 a.m. and 2 a.m. on Friday and Saturday nights. Mr. Britton replied that he would not be able to provide that information; however, Mir. Arcinage might. Larry Arcinage, ?650 Calle Casino, Rancho Cucamonga, one of the owners of the establishment, addressed the Commission and replied that approximately 689b of the establishment's business was generated between those hours; thus, it would be economically unfeasible to curtail the business hours as suggested by staff in the Resolution. Commissioner Stout asked if dinner is currently being served at the Boars Head. Mr. Arcinage replied that it is not currently being served; however, a cook had recently been hired and that the establishment is currently training personnel and creating a full dinner menu which would be served between the hours of 5 p.m. and 10 p.m. Commissioner McNiel asked Mr. Areinage when he expects to have the dinner menu ready to go into effect. Mir. Arcinage replied that they had anticipated to begin in November, however not being able to find a suitable cook had delayed those plans. A new cook had recently been hired Planning Cornmission Minutes 2 October 27, 1382 -J � c and now he anticipated they would begin serving dinner in approximately two to six months. Commissioner Stout asked Mr. Arcinage if he was made aware of the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit wher, he purchased the Boars Head in 1982. Mr. Arcinage replied that he .vas nci and this was the second restaurant bought from the same person. As the first restaurant purchased in Upland has only served lunch for the past nine years, he felt that there were no problems. Doug Gorgen, 7333 Hellman, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the Commission stating that he was agreeable to blocking oaf the northwest parking lo. as suggest_Pd by s.Lf_; however, did not want to do the planting of the slope area suggested by staff as he felt it would not solve sny problems. Further, that a wood fence had been placed behind the houses of the surrounding property owners, but the solution might be to put up a block wail. Also, he was agreeable to the installation of speedbumps in the parking lot. Commissioner Barker asked Mr. Gorgen if he was suggesting that a noise attenuation block wall should be built at the rear of the residential property, with the property owners' permission. Mr. Gorgen replied that he was and this would be much better than requiring more landscaping. Commission Barker asked how high would the :call be? Mr.. Gorgen replied that he would suggest that it be 6 to 6112feet high. Commissioner Barker asked if there would be any problems with that from an engineering point of view? Rick Gomez, City Planner, replied that the ultimate design would have to be analyzed from an engineering and sound attenuation viewpoint. Commissioner Barker asked Mr. Gorgen if he was intending to place the noise attenuation wall at the top of tic hill with the property owners' consent. Mr. Gorgen replied that he would be agreeable to placing the wall on the properties which are exposed to their parking lot; however, tnis would have to be with the consent of the property owners. Mel Futrell, 6623 Topaz, addressed the Commission stating that most of the problem was Frith the noise in the parking lot late at night and not just noise coming from inside the building. Further, that it was unfortunate tha� the owner of the business could not curtail -ors of operation because a N usiness ould not t e allowed to operate until 2 a.m. in sidential area. Bob Blascock, an adjacent shopowner located at 6636 Carnelian, addressed the Commission stating that while he could not attest to the noise problems at 2 a.m., he has occasionally worked at his business until 10 or 11 p.m. and had never peen bothered by Planning Commission Minutes 3 October 27, 1982 0 noise coming from the Loars Head. Further, that since the Boars Head has been under new ownership there has been an Improvement especially with the litter in the parking lot, which had previously been a problem. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Stout stated thst he would like to address the issue of curtailment of hours which staff had suggested in the Resolution because Ite was in favor of limiting the hours. Further, that when a use such as this was approved and allowed to aerate in a residential area, it should be understood by the applicant that this use would . ^t be the same as it would be in a C -2 area on Foothill Boulevard. Commissione^ McNiel stated that the majority of the problems teem to be created from the back parking area and the back door and asked Doug Gorgen if he could completely close off the back parking lot. Mr. Gorgen replied that he could close it off completely, but there might be a problem with fire access. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, stated that it could be chained, which could be removed during an emergency. Commissioner vlcNiel then stated that if the back parking lot was completely blocked off and it was strictly enforced that the rear doors remained closed he did rot think the problem would continue and this might be the solution. Further, that probably as much ® noise is generated from the Bob's Restaurant as the Boars Head, therefore had no objections to the current operating hours. 7:50 p.m. Planning Commission Recessed 7:55 p.m. Planning Commission Reconvened Chairman King stated that he agreed that the general usage within the area which is located should have some strict conditions placed on it to make it as amenable as possible with the surrounding area. Further, that based or. the comments this evening, it appeared that the proolems stem primarily from, or as a result of, the parking area behind the establishment. -Also, that maybe an appropriate way to deal with the issue since there is a new ownership involved would be to pass all the conditions as recommended by staff with the exception of the condition dealing with the Yours of operation. Chairman King stated that he was aware that the major grievance of the adjacent residents was the hours of operation; however felt that the problen of hours of operation in conjunction with the parking situation wa; what made the two uses inconsistent. Further, that he would be agreeable to passing the remaining conditions2 chaining off the rear parking area, allowing the hours of operation to remain as they currently are, and requiring the Conditional Use Permit to come before the Commission for review in two months. He stated that in this way the Commission would not be acting in a precipitous fashion in limiting the hours to 12 a.m. when all of the complaints are generated from the rear parking area. Also, if it appeared that the complaints are not mitigated by the chaining off of the rear parking area, it would be back before the Commission and further action would be taken. Planning Commission Minutes 4 October 27, 1982 11 Commissioner Barker stated that he would have to agree with Commissioner Stout in that this is a use that borders on incompatibility and it is very difficult to place a use of this type, unless it was a restaurant, that close to a residential area. Further, that if it appeared that he would lose the vote on whether the permit is brought back to the Commission in sixty days rather than argue for an earlier closing time, he would like to amend the Resolution to include the sound attenuation wall so that some relief would be provided for the surrounding residents. Commissioner Rempel stated that he agreed wit i the amendment of the Resolution to include the sound attenuation wail. Further, that tLe wall could not be just a Plair block wall but a well with some type of deadening in it. Also, it should be a rough textured surface or be planted with some type of vine. He also agreed with Chairman King that the Conditional Use Permit should come back before the Commission in sixty days. Commissioner Stout stated that he would like to suggest that this approval be personal to Mr. Arcinage because he may be willing to make a good effort to solve the issues at hand, but should he desire to sell the business, a new owner may not. Commissioner Barker stated that he was still concerned with the 2 a.m. closing time in a residential area when it is fifteen to twenty feet from someone's back yard. Commissioner McNiel stated that he felt it was both unfortunate and unfair that the new owc.er is in this situation since he has made some headway and put forth some effort in making this a more compatible situe.tion. Further, that this owner was being subjected to penalties based on what happened prior to his purchsse of the business and judgment should be made on what this man does with the property. 1lotion: Moved 5y 'McNiel, seconded by King, carried, to modify the Conditional Use Permit to include Conditions 2, 3, and 5 through 11 as recommended by staff. Condition 10 would require review by the Commission in two months. Also to be added to the Conditions would be the requirement of a block sound attenuating wall and detailed plans to be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to installation. Chairman King asked if the two months time period would bring the CUP back for Commission review at the first meeting in January. Jack Lam, Community Development Director, stated that it would but the Commission might take into consideration that the first meeting in January may not give enough time for the r. ^_gotiation of agreements with the property owners on the construction of the wall, the wall construction, or time to see if the wall does much good V: alleviate the sound. Commissior 2r McNiel amended his motion regarding Condition 10 requiring review of the CUP by the Planning Commission at their meeting of January 26, 1983. AYES: CO".IMISSIONERS: NOES: COV MISSIONE'RE: ABSENT: CCYIMISSIONEFS: Planning Commission 'Minutes Me.liei, King, Rempel Barker, Stout None 5 October 27, 1582 L-1 11 11 Commissioners Barker and Stout voted No on this project because they felt the hours, to be incompatible with the acjr --eat are --. Commissioner Rempel stated that he would like it made clear that if he receives one complaint or personally saw that the Conditions were not being complied with, he would not hesitate to bring this item back before the Commission before the agreed time limit. Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, advised the audience that the decisior. of the planning Commission could be appealed to the City Council within fourteen days of this meeting and that staff coul be contacted for further information. Commissioner 'McNiel stated that he may have made an unpopular decision to some people tonight; however, would also like to go on record as saying he also would not hesitate to bring the CUP back before the Commission if a complaint is received. Chairman King recognized Edith Bartholomew, 5995 Napa, Rancho Cucamonga, who wished to address the Commission, Ms. Bartholomew stated that she sn eed with Commissioners Barker and Stout in that the hours of 2 a.m. are later than ary other businessin the surrounding area and too late for a residential area. Further, that she was totally against the sale of alcoholic beverages in a residential area. ssxxs C. PARCEL MAP acres zone STEPHENS - A Plan), located at the northwest corner of Sumsit and East Avenues. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner Rempel asked if the area of local streets had been looked into with regard to the Etiwarda Specific Plan to know where they are going to alleviate the need for dedication of roadway at the side or back of this property in the future. Mr. Rougeau replied that future dedication was not anticipated because the future streets would be installed so that the lotting patterns in a larger development world be developed to provide for the interior streets to be away from the border of this project. Commissioner Rempel stated that one of the shortcomings of the Specific-, Plan is that it does nr)t lay out many of the streets, making it very difficult in approving parcel maps in tre Etiwanda Specific Plan area. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Gary Sanderson, 9537 Arrow, Ran-:!ho Cucamonga, addressed the Commission stating that his client was in —reement with the conditions of both the Planning and Engineering Divisions. Ln response to the existing streets, Mr. Sanderson commented that East Avenue and Summit Avenue realignments should not have any affect on this parcel. There were no further public comments and the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission 'Minutes October 27, 1582 CJt� � GNGH CG': h.L diTY' UVEIOPYENT DEPT_ — � AUG ' 3 1983 t�// AM PU _ .�utvf [� -CLsO� /�•� -��a� G�„•reo /Y•Ccc- ,<�c..� �� .rte Geav� 9 _ �CGI ✓LGG ?G... � � f�� arc. -e C��/'�v � .�� C�v7�c�� . -- amt �acr� 7u zez lop r ��.�� /lrG1 �CiLtc<��^" 11••� �� /i32d "�f'. ¢LLL�i O�v:u t L Gt si- �i�'Zf•t/ �r�c`r !— Lv 1rc!�G; ` �f• Gr�1� �� :, `�• -�c� CL d'cf� -r►2 -• G� zi.�L'c� �c- �i�y:.,•,,.. ',..JC �v. O _ � � .. -r_ ., , .mil t�e.•..�fJ.e'/ G� 3r %pr'.4� /' f�-� ' : - `? - + �n.trn,/